6X-, ¡,.
HÚ¡
¡ Í¿1'~>
m^evus
Vol. 26 (1)
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Oviedo, junio 2008
Iberas
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Comité de Redacción (Board of Editors)
Editor di Publicaciones (Editor-in-Chief)
Serge Gofas Universidad de Málaga, España
Director de Redacción (Exkutive Editor )
Gonzalo Rodríguez Casero Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editora Ejecutiva (Managimg Editor)
Eugenia Mg Martínez Cueto-Felgueroso Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editores Adjuntos (Associate editors)
Iberus gualtieranus (Linnaeus, 1758), una especie emblemática de la península Ibérica, que da
nombre a la revista. Dibujo realizado por José Luis González Rebollar “Toza”.
Iberus
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Vol. 26 (1)
Oviedo, junio 2008
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus publica trabajos que traten sobre cualquier aspecto relacionado con la Malacología. Se
admiten también notas breves. Iberus edita un volumen anual que se compone de dos o más números.
Instrucciones para los autores
Los manuscritos deben remitirse a: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Bio-
logía Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España.
Los trabajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias). Se recomienda a los autores leer
cuidadosamente las normas de publicación que se incluyen en cada número de la revista.
SUBCRIPCIONES
Iberus puede recibirse siendo socio de la Sociedad Española de Malacología, en cualquiera de sus
formas, o mediante intercambio. Aquellos socios que deseen adquirir números atrasados deberán diri-
girse al bibliotecario.
Los no socios deberán ponerse en contacto con BACKHUYS PUBLISHERS, P.O. Box 321,
2300 AH Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-71-31 70 208, Fax: +31-71-31 71 856, Correo Elec-
trónico: backhuys@euronet.nl
Los resúmenes de los artículos editados en esta revista se publican en Aquatic Science
and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) y en el Zoological Records, BIOSIS.
Contents list published in Aquatic Science and Fisheries Abstracts and Zoological Records ,
BIOSIS.
Dep. Leg. B-43072-81
ISSN 0212-3010
Diseño y maquetación: Gonzalo Rodríguez
Impresión: LOREDO, S. L. - Gijón
© Sociedad Española de Malacología Iberas, 26 (1); 1-4, 2008
"(w
Re-discovery of living specimens of Heliacus ( Gyriscus ) jef-
freysianus (Tiberi, 1867) (Gastropoda: Architectonicidae)
Redescubrimiento de ejemplares vivos de Heliacus ( Gyriscus ) jef-
Jreysian i/s (Ti be ri , 1867) (Gastropoda: Architectonicidae)
Constantine MIFSUD* and Panayotis OVALIS**
Recibido el 17-VII-2007. Aceptado 9-X-2007
ABSTRACT
Heliacus (Gyriscus) ¡effreysianus (Tiberi, 1 867), a rare architectonicid species associated
with Corallium rubrum (L., 1758), has been rediscovered alive off Crete, eastern Mediter-
ranean.
RESUMEN
Heliacus ( Gyriscus ) ¡effreysianus (Tiberi, 1 867), una especia rara de architectonicido aso-
ciado a Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1 758), ha sido redescubierta con ejemplares vivos,
frente a la isla de Creta en el Mediterráneo oriental.
KEY WORDS: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architectonicidae, Heliacus j effreysianus, Crete.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architectonicidae, Heliacus jeffreysianus, Creta.
INTRODUCTION
Heliacus ( Gyriscus ) jeffreysianus was
described by Tiberi (1867) from three
specimens collected from a red coral
substratum off Sardinia. He described
the species a year after its discovery, as
stated by Coen (1932).
SYSTEMATICS
Original description: Cochlea turbinata,
elato-conica, turrita, modice umbilicata, inteo-
fulvescens; apex obtusiusculus, laevigatus,
vértice intorto, subperf orato, spiraliter invo-
luto; anfr. 7 convexi, sutura profunda divisim
transverse cingulati, cingulis confortis, alter-
natim majoribus (num.fere 15 totidemque
minaribus in ultima anfractu; num. 6 in
penúltimo), eleganter granulosis, submonili-
formibus; anfr. Ultimus rotundatus, subin-
flatus, basi paululum depressus; umbilicus
mediocris, pervius, superne circolariter crenu-
latus; apert. Subcircularis, effusa, intus haud
margaritacea, marginibus acutis, callo pari-
etali junctis; margine columellari sinuato,
reflexo, umbilici partem occultante. - Diam.
Maj. 9, min. 8, alt 10? mili. - Operculum
corneum, superne núcleo centrali depresso
lamellaque erecto-crenulata multispiratum,
inferné processu centrali styliformi paucispi-
rato praeditum, limbo peripherico incrassa-
tum- Animal hucusque incognitum.
Hab. Infundís coralligenis maris Sar-
diniam meridionalem ambientis.
* 5, Triq ir-Rghajja, Rabat RBT 2486, Malta
** Agisilaou 37-39, Tzitzifies/Kallithea, 17674 Athens, Greece
1
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figure 1. Heliacus (Gyriscus) jeffreysianus (Tiberi, 1867), off Crete Island on Corallium rubrum
(Linnaeus, 1758) in 120m. Size: 9x8 mm. Photo P. Ovalis.
Figura 1. Heliacus (Gyriscus) jeffreysianus (Tiberi, 1867), frente a la isla de Creta sobre Corallium
rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758) en 120m. Size: 9x8 mm. Foto P. Ovalis.
Tiberi dedicated his species to the
illustrious malacologist John Gwyn Jef-
freys (1809-1885). Two of the specimens
are presently in the Coen collection at
The Hebrew University, (Department of
Zoology) Jerusalem, Israel and the other
specimen is in the Jeffreys collection at
the Smithsonian Institution, Washington
(USA) (Melone and Taviani 1984).
New material: Two live specimens of
Heliacus ( Gyriscus ) jeffreysianus were
recently recovered from a living colony
of Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758)
from off the island of Crete at a depth of
120 m. Figure 1 shows one of the two
similar specimens, measuring h= 9 mm
x w= 8 mm which is about the same size
as those found by Tiberi. The specimens
were hand picked from a coral colony
by a professional scuba diver from Crete
using specialized diving equipment. It is
not known whether the molluscs were
actually feeding on the coral polyps.
However, the species seems to have a
cióse connection with C. rubrum. Several
species from the family Architectonici-
dae are known to be parasitic on coráis
(Bieler 1993). Judging from the two
presently known records, the species
has always been found with these red
coráis, and as it is well known, it was
never found in any other Mediterranean
habitat notwithstanding the large
amount of research carried out in the
last hundred years.
Since its original description, the
species had never been found again
until recently, when living specimens of
Heliacus jeffreysianus were collected in
the Adriatic Sea (Stanic and Schiapar-
elli, 2007). It is very curious, but not
surprising, that both this and our dis-
coveries were recorded at the same time
and at distantly separated places. This is
certainly due to the more recent interest
being undertaken both by amateur and
professional researchers in the depths of
the red and white coral substratum of
the Mediterranean Sea. The authors are
also aware of other unrecorded species
living in this part of the Mediterranean,
and originally described from deep
water in the Atlantic.
Otherwise, Heliacus jeffreysianus has
only been cited in the literature in a few
species lists and catalogues pertaining
to the Mediterranean malacofauna and
it was even thought to be extinct. More-
over, no fossil specimens of the species
have ever come to light (Melone and
Taviani 1984).
Monteros ato (1880) had com-
mented about the species of Tiberi "II G.
jeffreysianus, é una delle nostre piú rare
gemme, la cui scoperta, come di tante
altre raritá coralligene, si deve al Dr.
Tiberi. Soltanto tre esemplari ne sono
conosciuti sinora. Beati possidentes! lo
voglio ammettere che nella mente di un
naturalista il Gyriscus abbia piú valore
2
Mifsud AND OvaliS: Re-discovery of living specimens of Heliacus (Gyriscus) jeffreysianus
Figure 2. Map of the Mediterranean showing the three locadons cited for H. jeffreysianus. 1: Sardi-
nia Island; 2: Adriatic Sea; 3: Crete Island.
Figura 2. Mapa del Mediterráneo mostrando las tres localidades citadas para H. jeffreysianus. 1: isla
de Cerdeña; 2: mar Adriático; 3: isla de Creta.
del piú grosso diamente della corona
d'Inghilterra, ma francamente il prezzo
al quale lo vende il Dr. Tiberi, per una
conchiglia cosí piccola, sará riguardato
tanto dai naturalisti quanto dai mercanti
come assai esagerato"
In transía tion: "The G. jeffreysianus is
one of our most rare gems, its discovery,
like many other coralligeneous rarities,
is owed to Dr. Tiberi. Only thee speci-
mens are known up to now. Blessed are
the possessors\ I must admit that in the
minds of the naturalist the Gyriscus has
more valué than the largest diamond
from the British crown, but frankly the
price which Dr. Tiberi has asked, for
such a small shell is regarded by natu-
ralists and also by merchants as being
exaggerated."
H. jeffreysianus is one of the most
beautiful species from the family Archi-
tectonicidae. Its sculpture of small-
beaded spiral chords and its trochoid
shape make it outstanding and very dis-
tinguished among the other species of
the family in the Mediterranean. In fact,
Tiberi (1867) created a genus for it,
Gyriscus, which is nowadays a subgenus
of Heliacus. A very similar Pacific species
is H. ( Gyriscus ) asteleformis (Powell,
1965) from New Zealand.
Coen (1932) figured the operculum
from one of the two specimens in his
collection (also figured in Melone and
Taviani, 1984). Melone and Taviani
(1984) described and figured a syntype
from the Coen collection. They also
figured the radula (as redrawn after
Merril, 1970). Other descriptions and
diagnoses of the genus and the species
can also be found in Coen (1932),
Melone and Taviani (1984) and in
Bieler (1993).
CONCLUSIONS
This very long elapsed period of
o ver 140 years for the re-discovery for
H. jeffreysianus is in all probability due
to its rarity and the very particularly
restricted and difficult to sample
habitat. Red coral was traditionally har-
vested by fishermen utilizing a particu-
lar gear called the Cross, which consists
of two large beams tied together in the
form of a cross and armed with dan-
gling ropes and pieces of netting to
enable the coral to entangle during
dredging. This heavy equipment,
although it seemed adequate for the
purpose, besides being very destructive
to the substratum, constantly shakes the
entangled coráis and the molluscs seem
to always fall off before the gear is
brought aboard the vessel. The modern
method of manual harvesting through
SCUBA is more selective, and therefore
much less destructive. However, it is
much more risky and dangerous.
Curiously, this species had not been
discovered on red coral before, although
3
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
the method of manual harvesting of coral
by specialized deep diving equipment
(using a mixture of gases) has now been
in practice for many years, especially by
Spanish, Italian and Greek coral divers.
More probably, it may take the keen eyes
of a biologist, a naturalist or a shell col-
lector to notice and pick out the small
mollusc shells in situ. Therefore any spec-
imens brought up by chance by the fish-
ermen or the divers are probably either
thrown back into the sea with the other
rubbish as in the case of the fishermen or
in the case of the diver, they fall off the
coral unnoticed during the long decom-
pression process. Moreover, the diver
would be even more concerned for his
"treasure" rather than a few "worthless"
shells. Although Mediterranean Corallium
rubrum is also found at great depths in the
Mediterranean, the two existing records
of H. jeffreysianus are both from shallow
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bieler, R., 1993. Architectonicidae ofthe Indo-Pa-
cific. Gustav Fischer Verlag, pp. 377. Stuttgart.
Coen, G. S., 1932. Sul genere Gyriscus, Tiberi,
1867. Bollettino della Societd Veneziana di
Scienze Naturali, 1 (1): 9-13.
Melone, G. and Taviani, M., 1984. Revisione
delle Architectonicidae del Mediterráneo.
Atti del Simposio: Sistemática dei Prosobranchi
del Mediterráneo, Bologna 24-26 Setiembre 1992,
(B. Sabelli, ed.) Lavori S.I.M., 21: 149-192.
Merrill, A. S., 1970. The family Architectonici-
dae (Gastropoda: Mollusca) in the western and
eastern Atlantic. Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ.
Delaware (Univ. Microfilms Int. Inc., Ann
Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A., Nr. 7144444).
water living colonies. Stanic and Schia-
parelli (2007) did not mention the species
on which they found their specimens.
Finally, this record extends the species dis-
tribution to quite a larger area of the
Mediterranean (Fig. 2) and it is expected
that more specimens which could con-
tribute to the study of the biology of the
species are likely to turn up.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Agios Nico-
laos, a specialized deep sea coral diver
for donating one of the two specimens
which he collected to one of the authors
(P. O.) for this study. Thanks are also
due to Sophie Valtat (Belgium) for pro-
viding important literature and to S.
Gofas (Spain) for revising and enhanc-
ing the manuscript.
Monterosato, T. A., 1880, Nota sopra alcune
conchiglie coralligene del Mediterráneo. Bol-
lettino della Societd Malacologica Italiana, 6:
243-259.
Stanic, R. and Schiaparelli, S., 2007. New
finding of living specimens of the rare ar-
chitectonicid Heliacus (Gyriscus) jeffreysianus
(Tiberi, 1867). Bollettino Malacologico, 43 (9-12):
143-146.
Tiberi, N., 1867. Diagnose du nouveau genre
méditerranéen Gyriscus. Journal de Conchy-
liology, 15: 303. Paris.
4
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Notes on West African Perrona (Gastropoda: Clavatulidae),
with the description of a new species
Notas sobre Perrona (Gastropoda: Clavatulidae) en Africa
Occidental, con la descripción de una nueva especie
Emilio ROLÁN*, Peter RYALL** and Juan HORRO***
Recibido el 31 -VI 1-2007. Aceptado el 19-X-2007
ABSTRACT
The type species of the genus Perrona is poorly known and given an erroneous type local-
ity. One of the purposes of this paper is to clarify its status and correct spelling as well as
illustrating the species and defining its distribution area. A new species from Angola
belonging to this genus is described. The shell, protoconch, operculum and radula are
illustrated, and the reasons for assigning this new species to this genus are discussed. All
known species of Perrona are figured.
RESUMEN
La especie tipo del género Perrona es poco conocida y la localidad tipo dada es errónea.
El objetivo de este trabajo es clarificar su situación, su correcto nombre, además de repre-
sentar la especie y clarificar su área de distribución. Se describe una nueva especie de
este género de Angola. Se muestran concha, protoconcha, opérculo y rádula de la nueva
especie y se discuten las razones para asignarla a este género y no a otros con similar
morfología. Se ilustran todas las especies conocidas de este género.
KEY WORDS: Clavatulidae, Perrona, West Africa, Angola, new species.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Clavatulidae, Perrona, África occidental, Angola, nueva especie.
INTRODUCTION
Classical malacological works like
Bruguiére (1792), Lamarck (1801, 1816
and 1822), Kiener (1840) and Reeve
(1843, 1845) and publications dealing
with Turridae (s.l.) such as Récluz
(1851), Petit de la Saussaye (1851), von
Maltzan (1883, 1884), Sykes (1905),
Dautzenberg (1912), Strebel (1912,
1914) have described numerous West
African species assigned to the family
Clavatulidae Gray, 1853.
Their generic placements and syn-
onymies are still not clear. Some modem
works like Knudsen (1952, 1956),
Ardovini (2004), Boyer and Hernán-
dez (2004), Nolf (2006), Nolf and Ver-
straeten (2006) and Boyer and Ryall
(2006) have described new species or
revised others, placing most of them in
the genus Clavatula.
Among our material from Angola,
dredged over many years by Xico Fer-
* Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, E 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
** St. Ulrich 16, A-9161 Maria Rain, Austria
*** Montero Ríos, 30-3° 36201 Vigo, Spain
5
Iberas, 26 (1), 2008
nandes, a new small unidentified
species was found. Its description is one
of the subjects of this work. The generic
attribution to the genus Perrona (Schu-
macher, 1817) requires a review of the
type species because it is a rather poorly
known species. This paper therefore
also comments on the type species.
The identity of Perrona perron
Martini and Chemnitz (1788: 278,
pl. 164, figs. 1573, 1574) illustrated a
shell they named "Der Perron ". Later
Gmelin (1791), referring to Chemnitz's
figures, described it as Murex perron and
indicated "in Océano australi" as its
geographic origin. This type locality is
obviously wrong. These figures, or the
shell they represent, can be considered
to be the lectotype. Its present where-
abouts, as noted below, are unknown.
When Lamarck (1816) described
Pleurotoma spirata he also made refer-
ence to the same illustrations, but sepa-
rated his species from them by stating
"La figure citée de Chemnitz offre sur la
base du dernier tour ; des sillons dont notre
coquille est absolutement dépourvue".
Schumacher (1817) also referred to
the same illustrations of Chemnitz when
he described the genus Perrona and nomi-
nated Perrona tritonium as the type of this
genus. P. tritonium is therefore a júnior
objective synonym of Perrona perron
(Gmelin). Again no locality was given.
The species was subsequently
described for a third time by Reeve (1843)
who referred once more to Chemnitz's
illustrations. He gave it the ñame Pleuro-
toma perronii, drawing his own figure
from his own shell. He likewise did not
State a locality or habitat. Reeve cited
Lamarck 's spirata as a different species,
writing "1 have a shell before me ofvery dif-
ferent character (Pleurotoma Perronii,
nobis), answering exactly to the figure in
question". Reeve (1843) did not cite
Gmelin and therefore appeared to con-
sider his ñame as a valid new species.
However it is clearly a júnior synonym of
Gmelin's species and it is concluded that
this was an omission in Reeve's work.
Marrat (1877) was the first to give
an indication of the true range of the
species when he included it in a list of
North-west African shells which he
stated carne "from Madeira to the Gulf
of Guinea".
Tryon (1884), although stating his
Opinión that this species was an inter-
medíate form between lineata and
spirata , mentioned it as Clavatula (sub-
genus Perrona ) perron Chemnitz and
provided a detailed description.
Strebel (1912), in his revisión of
genus Perrona, treated as clearly differ-
ent species both spirata and perron. He
was able to examine Chemnitz's speci-
men from which the famous drawings
were made and reillustrated it. He
referred immature specimens of the
species to Reeve's description, calling
them perron var. reevei. He also correctly
indicated part of the correct habitat
range of the species, citing specimens he
had examined from Pointe Noire,
Congo to Ambriz, northem Angola.
Knudsen (1952) employed the ñame
"Clavatula perronii (Reeve)" noting that
the "Atlantide expedition" could not
obtain any additional material and that
Chemnitz's type could no longer be
traced at the ZMUC.
Powell (1966), who referred cor-
rectly to the type species of Perrona, did
not figure Perrona perron but illustrated
Perrona spirata (Lamarck, 1816).
More recently, Cernohorsky (1974)
figured a syntype from Chemnitz (in
ZMUC), commenting that "the species
most probably Uves in West Africa but this
locality has been not substantiated by either
literature records or authentic specimens.
Another possibility is that Murex perron is
conspecific with Pleurotoma spirata
Lamarck, 1816, as suggested by Nordsieck
(1968: 154) although the two species appear
quite distinct".
Finally, Bernard (1984, fig. 182)
figured under the erroneous ñame
"Clavatula kraepelini" three specimens of
this species. He unknowingly extended
Strebel's habitat range northwards,
quoting the localities of both Cape Este-
rias and Mayumba in Gabon, and indi-
cating a depth of -20 to -50 meters.
After examining Reeve's type speci-
men, the available literature and some
ó
RoláN ET AL.: Notes on West African Perrona with the description of a new species
shells in the collection of one of the
authors (PR), it was decided to record
some additional information about this
poorly known group.
Abbreviations:
AMNH American Museum of Natural
History, New York
ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia
BMNH The Natural History Museum,
London
MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Harvard university
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural "Luis
Iglesias" Universidad, Santiago de
Compostela
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
MNHN Muséum national d'Histoire
naturelle, París
ZMUC Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen
USNM National Museum of Natural
History, Washington
ZSM Zoological Staatmuenchen
Museum, Muenchen
CJH collection of Juan Horro, Vigo
CPR collection of Peter Ryall, Maria
Rain
SYSTEM ATIC PART
Family Clavatulidae Gray, 1853
Genus Perrona Schumacher, 1817
Type species: Perrona tritonium Schumacher, 1817 = Murex perron Gmelin, 1791 = Pleurotoma
perronii Reeve, 1843.
Perrona perron (Gmelin, 1791) (Figs. 1-13)
Der Perron Martini and Chemnitz, 1788: 278, pl. 164. figs. 1573, 1574 (Fig. 1).
Murex perron Gmelin, 1971: 3559.
Perrona tritonium Schumacher, 1817: 218.
Pleurotoma perronii Reeve, 1843: pl. 11, sp. 94 (Fig. 2).
Type material: Figured syntype of Der Perron, whereabouts presently unknown; this specimen is
reported as examined by Strebel (1912) but could not be traced by Knudsen (1952) who never-
theless mentions another shell labelled in the handwriting of Chemnitz. Pleurotoma perronii: holo-
type BMNH 1900.2.8.26.
Other material examined: 8 shells (Figs. 4-10), Pointe Noire, Congo (CPR).
Type locality: Erroneous for Der Perron (in Océano australi). Not mentioned in the original descrip-
tion of any of the other taxa. Here designated at Pointe Noire, Congo.
Description: Shell (Figs. 3-12) see the
original descriptions as well as Tryon
(1884) and Strebel (1912). The follow-
ing data can be added: the protoconch
(Fig. 13) consists of about 2 1 ¡i shiny,
smooth whorls, honey brown in colour;
the first whorl slightly darker and of 750
pm diameter. From the protoconch
whorls a series of opisthocline axial ribs
start to form, first as thin riblets extend-
ing from the top to the bottom of the
whorl, becoming stronger and shaped
as an inverted C in the second teleo-
conch whorl where their bases become
more globose. Between them small
striae can be seen. In the subsequent
whorl they detach themselves entirely
from the upper subsutural cord which
also increases in prominence. In the
fourth teleoconch whorl these vestiges
of the axial ribs become closer and
closer to the lower suture, declining in
prominence until they entirely disap-
pear. The following whorls are smooth
with an irregular, raised subsutural
collar and the whorls are traversed by s-
shaped striae. At the same time as the
axial riblets form in the third whorl.
7
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
about 9 radial striae also start to emerge
becoming slightly stronger in the fol-
lowing whorls but then decreasing in
intensity in the fourth or fifth whorls
and thereafter are hardly noticeable.
The shell is a light honey-brown
throughout. On the fourth whorl the
subsutural colar starts to become lighter,
being entirely white in the fifth whorl.
In subsequent whorls it can be interrup-
ted by patches of light brown; in the
final whorl the two major cords are
white interspaced with small brown
patches the same colour as the whorl
itself and the cords on the columnella
are also white.
Size : the shell can reach up to 37.2
mm (Bernard, 1984).
Remarks : The comparison of juvenile
specimens of P. perron with species of
the genus Clavatula (type species: Clavat-
ula coronata Lamarck, 1801) show much
similarity in the aspect of the opistho-
cline axial ribs, which tend to disappear
with maturity in the subsequent whorls.
For this reason it is concluded that there
is a stronger relationship between these
two genera, than with other genera
within this family.
Whilst some authors synonymized P.
perron with P spirata Lamarck, 1816 it
must be noted that not only are they
morphologically different, but the latter
inhabits an area further to the south,
being restricted to the Luanda area
where it has been found at -5/50 meters.
Distribution : This species inhabits the
West African infralittoral coast from Cap
Esterias (Gabon) to Ambriz (northern
Angola).
Special remarks: The type locality is
always related with a holotype or a lec-
totype. In the present case, the original
figures are sufficient to determine the
identity of the species and it is not nec-
essary to designate a neotype; Pleuro-
toma perronii was described lacking type
locality as confirmed by the label of this
holotype in BMNH. If the type locality
of the first description is erroneous, and
no other is mentioned in the description
of the synonymized taxa, it is necessary
to give more detailed information.
Pointe Noire (Congo) is designated as
the type locality being in the center of
the known distribution area, as well as a
locality mentioned by Strebel (1912)
and the source of our specimens. Our
material agrees very well with the
figures and the known holotype.
Concerning the correct spelling for
the ñame of this species, it must be
perron, which is the first ñame employed
by Gmelin (1791) and which is appa-
rently a ñame not dedicated to a person.
Tryon (1884) stated that Chemnitz
employed the common Dutch ñame
"perron" (= flight of stairs, in reference
to the profile) and that Reeve (1843),
misinterpriting Chemnitz's ñame to be a
personal ñame, Latinized it to read
"perronii”.
Perrona micro spec. nov. (Figs. 14-19, 21, 23, 24-28)
Material examined: Holotype (Figs. 14, 15), in MNCN (15.05/47050). Paratypes in the following
collections: MNHN (1, Fig. 16); BMNH (1, Fig. 17); AMNH (1); USNM (1); ZSM (1); ANSP (1); MCZ
(1); CPR (11); CJH (6); MHNS (16, Fig. 18).
Type locality: Palmeirinhas, south of Luanda, Angola, between 3 and 20 meters depth.
Etymology: The specific ñame refers to the small size of the species.
Description: Shell (Figs. 14-18) small
for the genus, very solid, lanceolate.
Protoconch (Figs. 21, 23, 24-26) with a
little more than one whorl, of 530 pm in
diameter and white in colour. The teleo-
conch begins with three grooves that
sepárate 4 cords, later increasing to four
and then five spiral grooves; there are
six in the subsequent whorl; the two
cords immediately below the suture as
well as the lowest cord are more promi-
nent. This gives the middle part of the
whorl a concave appearance whilst the
upper and lower parts protrude before
their separation at the suture. There is
no axial sculpture except for growth
8
RoláN ET AL.: Notes on West African Perrona with the description of a new species
Figures 1-13. Perrona perron. 1: figure from MARTINI AND CHEMNITZ (1788); 2: figure of the
holotype of Pleurotoma perronii from Reeve (1843); 3: holotype (see below Figs. 11, 12) of Pleuro-
toma perronii (BMNH) at the same comparative size; 4-6: shell (27.6 mm), Pointe Noire, Congo
(CPR); 7: shell, 28.6 mm, Pointe Noire (CPR); 8, 9: juveniles, 18.6 and 14.2 mm, Pointe Noire
(CPR); 10: shell, 27.2 mm, Pointe Noire (CPR); 11, 12: holotype of P. perronii , 25 mm (BMNH);
13: spire and protoconch, Pointe Noire (CPR).
Figuras 1-13. Perrona perron. 1: figura de MARTINI Y CHEMNITZ ( 1 788); 2: figura del holotipo de Pleurotoma
perronii, de Reeve ( 1 843); 3: holotype ( véase abajo Figs. 1 1, 12) de Pleurotoma perronii (BMNH) con el mismo
tamaño relativo; 4-6: concha, 27,6 mm, Pointe Noire, Congo (CPR); 7: concha, 28,6 mm, Pointe Noire (CPR);
8, 9: juveniles, 18,6 y 14,2 mm, Pointe Noire (CPR); 10: concha, 27,2 mm, Pointe Noire (CPR); 11, 12: holotipo
de P. perronii, 25 mm (BMNH); 13: spire and protoconch, Pointe Noire (CPR).
9
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Figures 14-19. Perrona micro spec. nov. 14, 15: holotype, 10.3 mm (MNCN); 16: paratype, 10.6
mm (MNHN); 17: paratype, 8.5 mm (BMNH); 18: paratype, 7.6 mm (scanning electrón micro-
scope) (MHNS); 19: operculum (SEM). Figures 20-23. Comparison of the spire and protoconch
of Clavatula quinteni (Figs. 20, 22) and Perrona micro (Figs. 21, 23).
Figuras 14-19. Perrona micro spec. nov. 14, 15: holotipo, 10,3 mm (MNCN); 16: paratipo, 10,6 mm
(MNHN); 17: paratipo, 8,5 mm (BMNH); 18: paratipo, 7,6 mm (microscopio electrónico de barrido)
(MHNS); 19: opérenlo ( MEB). Figuras 20-23. Comparación de la espira y protoconcha de Clavatula
quinteni (Figs. 20, 22) y Perrona micro (Figs. 21, 23).
10
ROLÁN ETAL.: Notes on West African Perrona with the description of a new species
Figures 24-27. Perrona micro. 24: detail of the spire; 25, 26: detail of the protoconch; 27: radular
tooth; 28: radula. Figures 29-33. Perrona obesa. 29: holotype, 34.0 mm (BMNH); 30: shell, 31.2
mm, 10 m, Namibe, Angola (CER); 31: shell, 35.7 mm, Namibe, Angola (CPR); 32, 33: shells,
40.2, 41.6 mm, Sacomar, Namibe, Angola (CPR).
Figuras 24-27. Perrona micro. 24: detalle de la espira; 25, 26: detalle de la protoconcha; 27: dientes de
la rádula; 28: rádula. Figuras 29-33. Perrona obesa. 29: holotipo, 34. 0 mm (BMNH); 30: concha,
31,2 mm, 10 m, Namibe, Angola (CER); 31: concha, 35,7 mm, Namibe, Angola (CPR); 32, 33:
conchas, 40.2, 41.6 mm, Sacomar, Namibe, Angola (CPR).
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
lines which form an U-shape in the
concave central portion; this is reversed
on both the upper and lower protruding
parts forming an overall S-shape on the
whorl. There are about 6 whorls on the
teleoconch, increasing gradually in
width and height. The last whorl
becomes elongated towards the base,
the siphonal canal is widely open and
almost similar in length to the lowest
part of outer lip. The aperture is ovoid,
with an U-shape sinus in the upper part,
a sharp external lip, and a small callus
on the columella. There are 20 spiral
grooves from the periphery to the base.
The colour is typically light brown or
orangish, with white and dark blotches
alternating on the subsutural cords, but
in a few specimens the colour is darker
and the white pattern is absent.
Soft parts: Study of a retracted speci-
men preserved in alcohol reveáis a light
coloured animal; the operculum (Fig.
19) is ovoid with the nucleus centrally
placed on the interior. The radula (Fig.
28) is formed by two rows of about 70
elongate and sharply pointed marginal
teeth (Fig. 27) at the center of which is a
very small central tooth reduced to a
cusp.
Dimensions : Flolotype is 10.3 mm.
The largest paratype is 12 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type locality, where it is probably
endemic.
Discussion: There is no known
species from West Africa with which it
can be confused. Only juvenile forms of
Clavatula quinteni Nolf and Verstraeten,
2006, which are much larger when
adult, are similar in profile and coloura-
tion; they both lack axial sculpture (see
comparison in Figs. 20 and 21, 22 and
23) but C. quinteni has a much more
elongated siphonal canal, a larger proto-
conch (more than double the diameter)
and lacks spiral grooves.
There was some hesitation about the
generic assignment of this new species.
Comparison with morphologically
similar species in some genera was
made, in particular Microdrillia Casey,
1903; Suavodrillia Dalí, 1918; Parecuneus
Laseron, 1954, and Maoritomella Powell,
1942, Tomopleura Casey, 1904, and Viridi-
turris Powell, 1964. In all cases opercu-
lum and radula do not agree.
Perrona micro spec. nov., in spite of
its small size, belongs to Clavatulidae.
This is confirmed by the operculum
with a medium-lateral nucleus and the
wishbone-like marginal teeth with a
vestigial rachidian one in the middle.
Powell (1966) reviewed the Turri-
dae (s. 1.) and defined the subfamily
Clavatulinae H. and A. Adams, 1858
with four recent and two fossil genera;
the recent genera being Clionella, Clavat-
ula, Perrona (with subgenus Tomellana)
and Pusionella. Kilburn (1985), who
dealt only with South African species,
noted 4 genera; Toxiclionella, Bentho-
clionella , Clavatula and Clionella. Tucker
(2004) considers 492 fossil and 97 recent
species in this group. Later Bouchet
and Rocroi (2005) elevated Clavatuli-
dae to family status.
The genus Clavatula Lamarck, 1801 is
relatively abundant along the West
Africa coast. Powell (1966) mentions 11
species. Most of them, including the
type species ( Clavatula coronata Lamarck,
1801) are of large size. Other species
recently illustrated and/or described, as
detailed in our introduction, are also rel-
atively large. Although Boyer and
Ryall (2006) noted that Knudsen (1952,
1956) classified other genera of Clavatul-
idae under the genus Clavatula, subse-
quent authors seem to ignore these
genera and their paramaters as estab-
lished by Kilburn (1985). A revisión
could conclude that some of them
belong to other genera.
The genus Clavatula is described by
Powell (1966): "shell modera tely large
to large sized, 15 - 55 mm, very solid,
buccinoid, coarsely axially and spirally
sculptured; with a tall, often coronated
spire, and a trúncate body-whorl, termi-
nated in a relatively short reflected and
deeply notched anterior canal.... Oper-
culum ovate-lunate with a medio-lateral
nucleus. Radula consisting of a pair of
stout narrowly pointed marginal teeth
of modified wishbone type, the proxi-
mal extremity sepárate and superim-
posed upon the larger element. A small
12
RoláN ET AL. : Notes on West African Perrona with the description of a new species
Figures 34-37. Perrona spirata. 34-36: shell covered by organic material, 31.5 mm, Luanda, Angola
(CPR); 37: operculum. Figures 38-41. Perrona subspirata. 38: shell, 31.5 mm; 39-41: shell, 32.0
mm, Namibe, Angola (CPR); 42: operculum.
Figuras 34-37. Perrona spirata. 34-36: concha recubierta por material orgánico, 31,5 mm, Luanda,
Angola (CPR); 37: opérculo. Figuras 38-41. Perrona subspirata. 38: concha, 31,5 mm; 39-41: concha,
32,0 mm, Namibe, Angola (CPR); 42: opérculo.
13
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
but we 11 formed unicuspid central tooth
is present also." According to Kilburn
(1985) the main features of Clavatula are:
deep anal sinus, realtively long siphonal
canal, distict parietal tubercle and proto-
conch that is bluntly domed with about
2 1/2 whorls.
The species P. micro spec. nov. has
some shell characters of Clavatula but
has no axial sculpture and is smaller
than all of them. Clavatula cossignanii
Ardovini, 2004, the smallest Clavatuli-
dae known in West Africa, is different in
most features including the fewer
number of protoconch whorls and is
endemic to Senegal. The holotype is 13.2
mm but it can reach a size of 15.9 mm
(CPR).
According to Powell (1966) the
genus Clionella Gray, 1847 differs from
Pusionella Lamarck, 1801 by its clavi-
form shape with tall, flat-sided spire
whorls; simple long flexuous axials ribs
without either subsutural or peripheral
processes and a truncated body-whorl.
Kilburn (1985) defines Clionella with an
anal sinus; a slight notch; siphonal canal
short with no distinct parietal tubercle;
protoconch somewhat conical, of about
2 whorls, the first one rounded and
tilted. The genus is usually restricted to
South Africa. P. micro spec. nov. lacks
axial sculpture, its sinus is deep and
does not have a truncated body-whorl:
therefore it does not agree with Clionella.
The new species was also ruled out
of the genus Pusionella Gray 1847
because many specific characters are
absent in P. micro ; the flat-sided whorls;
the outer lip bordered by a broad, sub-
sutural, very slight sinus and the
smooth and polished surface.
Finally, the genus Perrona Schu-
macher, 1817 is described by Powell
(1966) as: "shell moderately large, 25 -
40 mm, rather narrowly fusiform, with a
tall spire of rapidly increasing whorls
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the Euro-
pean Synthesys Program which allowed
one of the authors (ER) to examine the
and a narrow body-whorl... surface
smooth, or nearly so... with a conspicu-
ous narrowly carinate subsutural
collar.... operculum as in Clavatula...
radula with a pair of elongate margináis
and a narrow-based unicusp central
tooth."
The known West African species of
Perrona, all figured in the plates in the
present work, are the following: P.
perron (Gmelin, 1791) (Figs. 1-13), P.
spirata (Lamarck, 1816) (Figs. 34-37),
both already mentioned, P. obesa
(Reeve, 1843) (Figs. 29-33) and P subspi-
rata (von Martens, 1903) (Figs. 38-41),
both endemic to South Angola. Other
authors have placed other species in
this genus, for example Perrona nifat
(Bruguiére, 1789) by Abbott and
Dance (1986), but this generic place-
ment is erroneous in our opinión.
Powell (1966) also mentions another
West African species belonging to this
genus but placed in the subgenus
Tomellana Wenz, 1843: Perrona ( Tomel -
lana) lineata Lamarck, 1816; but this
shell has a short, concave-outlined spire
and a deep slit-like anal sinus and does
not resemble our species. Strebel
(1912) referred other species to Tomel-
lana; they also do not correspond with
the species currently reviewed.
Perrona micro spec. nov. is more
similar to Perrona perron than to any
other type species and the new species
is placed in this genus as being the
closest. Also noticed is a similarity in the
colouration of the subsutural cord as
well as the S-shaped axial striae. We
find this at present the better solution
rather than to create a new genus.
Whilst the similarity noted with
Clavatula quinteni should not create con-
fusión, a result of this paper must also
be to assign this species to the genus
Perrona although this has not been the
reason for this work.
type material of Pleurotoma perronii and
other types; Jesús Méndez of the Centro
de Apoyo Científico y Tecnológico a la
14
ROLÁN ET AL. : Notes on West African Perrona with the description of a new species
Investigación (CACTI) of the University
of Vigo for the SEM photographs; Jesús
S. Troncoso for allowing us to use the
Photographic apparatus of the Departa-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abbott, R. T. and Dance, S. P., 1982. Com-
pendium ofSea Shells. E. P. Dutton, New York,
ix + 411 pp.
Ardovini, R., 2004. Clavatula cossignanii sp. n.
(Gastropoda; Turridae) dal Senegal, West
Africa. Malacologia, Mostra Mundiale, 43: 5-6.
Bernard, P. A., 1984. Seashells ofGabon. Pierre
A. Bernard, Libreville, 140 pp.
Bouchet, P. and Rocroi, J.-P., 2005. Classifi-
cation and Nomenclátor of Gastropod Fam-
ilies. Malacologia, 47(1-2): 1-397.
Boyer, F. and Ryall, P., 2006. Two new Cla-
vatulinae species (Caenogastropoda: Turri-
dae) from Ghana. Iberus, 24 (2): 33-38
Bruguiere, J.-G., 1792. Encyclopédie Méthodique ou
par Ordre de Mtiéres. Histoire Naturelle des Vers.
Vol. 1. Part 2. Panckouke, París, pp 345-757.
Cernohorsky, W. O., 1974. Type specimens
of Mollusca in the University Zoological Mu-
seum, Copenhagen. Records ofthe Auckland In-
stitute and Museum, 11: 143-192, figs. 1-67.
Dautzenberg, P., 1912. Mission Gruvel sur la
cote occidentale d'Afrique (1909-1910). Mol-
lusques marins. Anuales de l'lnstitut Océano-
graphique de Monaco, 5: 13-111, 3 pls.
Gmelin, J. F., 1791. Caroli a Linné Systema natu-
rae per regna tria naturae, Editio decima tertia,
aucta reformata. Leipzig: G. E. Deer. Tome 1,
pars 6 (Vermes): 3021-3910.
Kiener, L. C., 1840. Genre Pleurotome. ( Pleu -
rotoma, Lam.) Spécies général Muséum d'His-
toire naturelle de París, collection Lamarck, celle
du Prince Masséna et les découverts récente des
voyageurs. París: Rousseau. 84 pp, 27 pls.
Kilburn, R. N., 1985. Turridae (Mollusca: Gas-
tropoda) of Southern Africa and Mozam-
bique. Part 2. Subfamily Clavatulinae. Annals
ofthe Natal Museum, 26 (2): 417-470.
Knudsen, R. N., 1952. Marine Prosobranches
of Tropical West Africa collected by the
"Atlantidae" Expedition 1945-46. Part 1.
Videnskabele Meddeleser fra Dansk naturhis-
torisk Forening I Kjobenhavn, Bd. 114: 129-
185, pl. 13.
Knudsen, R. N., 1956. Marine Prosobranchs of
Tropical West Africa (Stenoglossa). Atlantide
Report n° 4. Danish Science Press, Ltd. Co-
penhaguen, 1956 pp. 93-105
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de, 1801. Systéme des Animaux
sans Vertebres, ou tableau Général des Classes, des
Orders et des Genres de ces Animaux Lamarck
and Deterville, París viii + 432 pp.
ment of Ecology of the University of
Vigo and Paul-Henri Hattenberger, St.
Jean de Blaignac, France for collecting
the Congolese specimens.
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de, 1816. Liste des objets repré-
sentés dans les planees de cette livaraison. Tableau
encyclopédique et Méthodique des Trois Régnes
de la Nature. Mollusques et Polypes Divers.
Veuve Agasse, París. 16 pp, pls. 391-488.
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de, 1822. Histoire Naturelle
des Animaux sans Vertébres...Précédée d'une In-
troduction Offrant la Détermination des Cha-
ractéres Essentiels de Y Animal, sa Distinction du
Végétal et des Autres Corps Naturels, Enfin Y -
Exposition des Principes Fondamentaux de la
Zoologie. Vol. 7. Guiraudet, París. 711 pp.
Maltzan, H. F. von, 1883. Beitráge zurKenntnis
der senegambischen Pleurotomiden. Jahr-
bücher der Deuschen Malakozoologischen Ges-
sellschaf, 10: 115-135, pl. 3.
Maltzan, H. F. von, 1884. Diagnosen neuer se-
negambischen Gastropoden. Nachrichtsblatt
der Deuschen Malakozoologischen Gessellschaf
16: 65-73.
Marrat, F. P., 1877. A list of West Africa shells,
including new Pleurotoma and Columbella.
Quarterly Journal of Conchology, 1: 237-244.
Martini, F. H. W. and Chemnitz, J. H., 1788.
Neues systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet, vol.
10, 1-376, pls. 137-173.
Nolf, F., 2006. Clavatula nathaliae (Mollusca:
Gastrododa: Conoidea: Turridae) a new spe-
cies from Gabon: an oíd mystery finally elu-
cidated. Neptúnea, 5 (3): 1-14.
Nolf, F. and Verstraeten, J., 2006. Recogni-
tion of two new Clavatula species (Mollusca:
Gastropoda: Conoidea: Turridae) in a com-
plex group from Gabon and North Angola.
Neptúnea, 5 (3): 15-29.
Nordsieck, F., 1968. Die europaischen Meeres
Gehauseschnecken (Prosobranchia) vom Eismeer
bis Kapverden und Mittelmeer. Gustav Fischer,
Stuttgart 273 pp.
Petit de la Saussaye, S., 1851. Notice sur un
groupe de coquilles classées parmi les Fuse-
aux ( Fusus Lam.) avec la description de
plusieurs espéces. Journal de Conchyliologie, 2:
73-79, 2 pls.
Powell, A. W. B., 1966. The molluscan families
Speightiidae and Turridae an evaluation of
the valid taxa, both Recent and fossil, with
lists of characteristic species. Bulletin of the
Auckland Institute and Museum, 5: 1-184.
Recluz, C., 1851. Description de quelques co-
quilles nouvelles. Journal de Conchyliologie, 2
(2):194-216, pls. 5-6.
15
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Reeve, L. A., 1843-1946. Monograph of the
Genus Pleurotoma. Conchologia Iconica, or II-
lustrations of the shells of molluscous animáis.
Reeve Brothers, London Vol. 1: pls. 1-40,
species 1-155, + índex and errata.
Schumacher, C. F., 1817. Essai d'un Nouveau Sy-
steme des habitations des vers testacés. Copen-
hagen: Schultz. iv + 287 pp, 22 pls.
Strebel, H., 1912. Bemerkungen zu den Clava-
tula-G ruppen Perrona und Tomella. Jahrbuch
der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstal-
ten, 29: 1-24, pl. 1.
Strebel, H., 1914. Mollusca I, Gen. Pusionella.
In Michaelsen, W. (Ed.): Beitrage zur Kennt-
nis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas, vol. 1, Ham-
burg, pp. 87-125, pl. 3.
Sykes, E. R., 1905. Descriptions of new forms of
Marginellidae and Pleurotomidae. Proceedings
of the Malacological Society, 6: 315-318, lpl.
Tryon, G. W., 1984. Manual of Conchology . Vol.
4 Conidae , Pleurotomidae. Philadelphia, Tr-
yon. 151-413, 34 pls.
Tucker, J: K., 2004. Catalog of Recent and fos-
sil turrids (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Zootaxa,
682: 1-1295.
ló
Iberus, 26 (1): 17-28, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Pattern of reserve storage of the two mussel species Perna
perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis living on Moroccan
coasts: annual variation and effect of pollution
Patrones de almacenamiento de reservas en dos especies de mejillón
Perna perna y Mytilus galloprovincialis de las costas de Marruecos:
variación anual y efecto de la contaminación
Abdellatif MOUKRIM*1, Mohamed ID HALLA*, Abderazak KAAYA*,
Abdellah BOUHAIMI*, Soumaya BENOMAR* et Michel MATHIEU**
Recibido el 23-XI-2005. Aceptado el 30-X-2007
ABSTRACT
The pattern of reserve storage and ¡ts ¡mportance ¡n the reproductive cycle of the two mus-
sel species living in Moroccan coasts, Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis, were
studied comparatively, during two annual cycles. Study was conducted at a polluted and
an unpolluted site in Agadir bay. Stereological analysis shows that P. perna presents only
one type of storage cells (vesicular cells) storing glycogen. In M. galloprovincialis, two
types of storage cells are present: vesicular cells and adipogranular cells (containing
glycogen, lipids and proteins). In both species, seasonal variations of reserve tissue vol-
ume are conversely proportional to those of the germinal tissues. Reserve tissue appeared
in spring (May) and increased in summer. It decreased quickly from August onwards, and
disappeared between January and April. In M. galloprovincialis, adipogranular cells dis-
appeared before vesicular cells and reappeared first. In the polluted site, seasonal varia-
tion of reserve and germinal tissues is comparable to that in unpolluted site but the máxi-
mum valué of reserve tissue percentage is less ¡mportant. Moreover, during the year, this
tissue did not disappear. Biochemical analysis shows that mean valúes of glycogen and
proteins quantities are significantly higher in P. perna than in M. galloprovincialis. How-
ever, total lipids quantity mean is higher in M. galloprovincialis. Seasonal variations of the
three biochemical parameters present a similar profile in the two species. Compared to
unpolluted site animáis, in polluted one, molluscs possess low glycogen and high lipids lev-
éis. Seasonal variations of these parameters show a perturbed profile.
RESUMEN
Se ha estudiado y comparado el patrón de almacenamiento de reservas y su importancia
en el ciclo reproductor en dos especies de mejillón de las costas de Marruecos, Perna
perna y Mytilus galloprovincialis, durante dos ciclos anuales. Este estudio se llevó a cabo
en un sitio contaminado y otro no contaminado de la bahía de Agadir. El análisis estere-
ológico demostró que P. perna presenta un solo tipo de células de reserva (células vesicu-
lares) almacenando glucógeno. En M. galloprovincialis, hay dos tipos de células de
* Laboratory Aquatic Ecosystems: Marine and Continental Field, Biology Department, Sciences Faculty, Ibn
Zohr University, BP 8106, 80000, Agadir, Morocco.
** Laboratory Marine Biology and Biotechnology, I. B. B. A., Caen University, France.
1 Corresponding author.
17
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
reserva: células vesiculares y células adipogranulares (conteniendo glucógeno, lípidos y
proteínas). En ambas especies, las variaciones estacionales del volumen de tejido de
reserva son inversamente proporcionales a las del tejido germinal. El tejido de reservas
apareció en la primavera (mayo) y se incrementó en verano. A partir de agosto, dismin-
uyó rápidamente y desapareció entre enero y abril. En M. galloprovincialis, las células
adipogranulares desaparecieron antes que las células vesiculares y son las primeras en
aparecer en el siguiente ciclo. En el sitio contaminado, la variación estacional de tejidos
de reserva y germinales es similar a la del sitio no contaminado, salvo que el porcentaje
máximo de tejido de reserva es menor. Además, este tejido no desapareció a lo largo del
año. Los análisis bioquímicos muestran que las cantidades promedias de glucógeno y de
proteínas son significativamente más altas en P. perno que en M. galloprovincialis. Sin
embargo, el promedio de lipidos totales fue mayor en M. galloprovincialis. Las varia-
ciones estacionales de los tres parámetros presentan un perfil similar en las dos especies.
Comparados con los del sitio no contaminado, los animales del sitio contaminado poseen
niveles bajos en glucógeno y altos en lípidos. Las variaciones estacionales de estos
parámetros muestran un perfil perturbado.
KEY WORDS: Agadir, Morocco, mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Perna perna, pollution effects, reproductive
cycle, reserves strategy.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Agadir, Marruecos, mejillones, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Perna perna , efectos de la conta-
minación, ciclo reproductor, estrategias de reserva.
INTRODUCTION
Two sympatric mussel species are
found along the Moroccan coast: the
African mussel Perna perna and the
Mediterranean mussel Mytilus gallo-
provincialis. The first species is located in
the north of its geographical distribu-
tion; the second one in its Southern
limit. In Agadir bay, these local popula-
tions of mussels have important com-
mercial valúes (Id Halla, 1997) and
environmental interest (Najimi,
Bouhaimi, Daubéze, Zekhnini, Pel-
LERIN, NARBONNE, AND MOUKRIM, 1997;
Kaaya, Najimi, Ribera, Narbonne, and
Moukrim, 1999; Moukrim, Kaaya,
Najimi, Roméo, Gnassia-Barelli, and
Narbonne, 2000) as sentinel species.
The few studies carried out on
mussel biology in this area, concern
only some aspects of the reproduction
cycle (Shafee, 1989; Id Halla,
Bouhaimi, Zekhnini, Narbonne,
Mathieu, and Moukrim, 1997). They
showed that P. perna and M. galloprovin-
cialis present synchronous reproductive
cycles, and breed throughout the year
with a principal spawning period in
spring. The only differences observed
by Id Halla et al. (1997), regard the
duration of the principal spawning
period (more important for P. perna ) and
the genital activity rhythm in summer
(reduced in this species).
In view of the importance of
reserves in the reproductive cycle
(Bayne, Bubel, Gabbott, Livingstone,
Lowe and Moore, 1982; Lowe, Moore
and Bayne, 1982; Pipe, 1987) and of the
particularities of reserve strategy in
Mytilidae (strategy essentially based on
the glycogen, presence of specific
storage cells and existence of a direct
relationship between reserve metabo-
lism and reproductive cycle), it was
interesting to conduct a comparative
study of P. perna and M. galloprovincialis
in order to describe the reserves strat-
egy for these two species living in the
same environmental conditions. The
two molluscs present an important dif-
ference regarding the cells involved in
the reserve storage. As indicated by
Lunetta (1969) P. perna presents only
one type of storage cells (vesicular cells
or glycogen cells), storing especially the
glycogen ; however, in M. galloprovin-
18
Moukrim ET AL.: Reserves strategy of mussels in Moroccan coasts
cialis (Herlin-Houtteville, 1974; Dan-
ton, Kiymoto, Komaru, Wada, Awaji
and Mathieu, 1996), two types of
storage cells are present, vesicular cells
(storing glycogen) and adipogranular
cells (containing glycogen, lipids and
proteins).
Furthermore, beyond the determina-
tion of pattern of reserve storage and its
importance in the reproductive cycle of
the two mussels living in Moroccan
coasts, this work studies the impact of
pollution on this pattern. Therefore, a
comparative study of two sites (unpol-
luted and polluted) was conducted.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sampling
This study was conducted during
two annual reproductive cycles
(October 1994 to August 1996). Two
types of sites, representative of the
Agadir marine bay were considered: i) a
reference site (unpolluted). Cap Ghir,
located 50 km north of Agadir City and
far from any human activity, and ii) a
polluted site (Anza) located 5 km north
of Agadir and receiving the industrial
and domestic untreated waste waters of
Anza zone. Many studies, conducted
during the same period of the present
study, showed that this site is contami-
nated by heavy metáis and PAHs either
accumulated by mussels or in sediment
(Id Halla, 1997; Najimi, 1997;
Moukrim, Kaaya, Najimi, Roméo,
Gnassia-Barelli and Narbonne 2000;
Kaaya, 2002), with some perturbations
in the physical and Chemical parameters
of seawater (Id Halla, 1997).
During this study, for each month,
ninety individuáis of 35 mm for each
species are collected at random in each
of the two sites. 30 individuáis/
species/sites were subject to stereologi-
cal analysis and 60 individuáis/
species/sites were dedicated to the bio-
chemical analysis.
Stereological analysis
In order to follow the seasonal vari-
ation of the glycogen according the
reproduction cycle in Mytilus gallo-
provincialis and Perna perna, an histo-
chemical study (stereological analysis)
was conducted in the mantle. Thirty
adult mussels were collected and
directly fixed in Gendre liquid for 3
days. Animáis were then removed from
shells and a central portion of mantle
tissue was correctly excised and embed-
ded in paraffin. Sections of 6 pm were
cut and stained by the periodic acid of
Schiff (PAS). Stereological analysis was
applied according the method of
Weibel, Kistler, and Scherle (1966)
which quantified the volume occupied
by the reserve and germinal tissues.
The cell types were determined accord-
ing the definition of Lubet (1959): i)
adipogranular cells (20-25 pm for
length, 4.5-5 pm for length of nucleus,
green coloration, contain lipids, pro-
teins and glycogen), and ii) vesicular
cells (50-80 pm for length, 3-5 pm for
length of nucleus, pink coloration,
contain only glycogen)
Biochemical analysis
Biochemical analysis (glycogen,
lipids and proteins) was carried out on
mussel mantle which in Mytilidae, con-
stitutes an important organ in storage of
reserves. Monthly, sixty adults were ran-
domly sampled, quickly transferred to
the laboratory in isotherm conditions
and frozen at -30°C. Glycogen, total
lipids and proteins were respectively
measured according the methods of
Duchateau and Florkin (1959),
Folch, Lees and Sloane-Stanley
(1957) and Lowry (1951). Rates of these
compounds were expressed as mg/g
fresh weight (mg/ g FW).
Statistical analysis
Stereological analysis was expressed
as a percentage of the total volume of
mantle tissue ; biochemical results as
means ± standard deviations. The statis-
tical significance of difference between
samples was evaluated by the "t" test
using the Statistica software (Release
4.5 A StatSoft Inc. Ed. 1993). A "P" valué
of less than 0.05 was considered as sta-
tistically significant.
19
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figure 1. Cells implicated in the reserve storage in Perna perna (A) (only one type of cells: ve:
vesicular cells) and Mytilus galloprovincialis (B) (two types of cells, ve: vesicular cells; adge: adi-
pogranular cells). Scale bars 10 pm.
Figura 1. Células implicadas en la acumulación de reservas en Perna perna (A) (solo un tipo de células:
ve: células vesiculares) y Mytilus galloprovincialis (B) (dos tipos de células, ve: células vesiculares; adge:
células adipogranulares). Escalas 10 pm.
RESULTS
Stereological analysis
Figure 1A shows that the mantle of
Perna perna presents only one type of
storage cells: vesicular cells (VC). In
Mytilus galloprovincialis (Fig. IB), two
types of storage cells are presentí adi-
pogranular cells (ADGC) and vesicular
cells (VC).
For P. perna, the respective volumes
of germinal and reserve tissues are con-
versely proportional (Fig. 2A). The sea-
sonal profile is similar during the two
studied annual eyeles. The volume of
germinal tissue increases from October
to February, when the máximum is
reached (respectively 72% and 77% in
the first and second year). From March
onwards, the germinal tissue volume
decreases to reach the minimum in
August (respectively 8% and 6% in the
first and second year). The reserve
tissues appeared in spring (May) and
increased until reaching maximal valúes
in summer (August). They decreased
quickly and disappeared between
January and April. In the polluted site
(Fig. 3A), the seasonal variation of
reserve and germinal tissues is similar
to that in the reference site but the
máximum valué of reserve tissues per-
centage is lower (57% and 62% respec-
tively in the first and second year).
Moreover, during the year, this tissue
did not disappear. The minimum valué
recorded was 7-10% in February.
For Mytilus galloprovincialis (Fig. 2B),
the volume of germinal tissue increases
in autumn and in the beginning of
winter to reach a máximum in February
(75%). Thereafter, we observe a reduc-
tion of the surface occupied by this
tissue until October where the
minimum (12%) is reached. During the
second eyele a similar evolution is
recorded. Otherwise, as with P. perna,
the volume of germinal tissue is
inversely proportional to reserve tissue.
Nevertheless, in this case, the máximum
is reached in October (64%), whereas the
disappearance takes place from January
to March for the two studied yearly
eyeles. In the polluted site (Fig. 3B), the
reserve tissue presents a seasonal evolu-
tion similar to the reference site. Besides,
this tissue never disappears as in P.
perna. The occupied minimal volume is
5% reached in February.
Moreover, for M. galloprovincialis, in
the reference site, the adipogranular cells
disappeared before the vesicular cells
and then reappeared first. In the polluted
site the two cellular categories persist
20
Moukrim ET AL. : Reserves strategy of mussels in Moroccan coasts
A
Reserve tissue ^ Germinal tissue O Others
B
100%
90%
OND JFMAM J JASOND JFMAM J JA
ADGC
VC
Germinal tissue
I | Others
Figure 2. Seasonal variation of germinal and reserve tissues in Perna perna (A) and Mytilus gallo-
provincialis (B) in the unpolluted site. (VC: vesicular cells storing glycogen; ADGC: adipogranular
cells, containing glycogen, lipids and proteins).
Figura 2. Variación estacional de los tejidos germinal y de reservas en Perna perna (A) y Mytilus gallo-
provincialis (B) en el sitio no contaminado. (VC: células vesiculares almacenando glucógeno; ADGC:
células adipogranulares, conteniendo glucógeno, lípidos y proteínas ).
during all the year. However, an oscilla-
tion can be observed in the volumes
occupied by the two categories of cells.
Biochemical analysis
Glycogen: The mean amount of
glycogen is significantly (F= 11.19 and
P= 0.027) higher in Perna perna than in
Mytilus galloprovincialis (respectively
59.6 ± 7.36 and 48.7 ± 4.78 mg/g FW).
For the two species, the seasonal varia-
tions are significant (F= 4.95 ; P= 10"6 for
Perna perna and F= 2.65 ; P= 4.7xl0'6 for
Mytilus galloprovincialis) and exhibit a
similar profile (Fig. 4A). The glycogen
increases in spring (from April), reaches
a maximal valué in August (219.4 and
191.9 mg/g FW in Perna perna and
Mytilus galloprovincialis respectively),
then decreases during autumn and
winter. The minimal valúes are noted in
February (0.39 and 0.34 mg/g FW in
Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis
respectively).
21
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
ioo%-
90% -
80% -
70% '
60% -
50% -
40% '
30% '
20% '
10%'
o%-
i
¡i
i I
li
I
l
i
i ¡ I
p
II
lli
Wm
i i
11.
li
,1
H
1*
"
L
i
i
■I
i»
1
OND JFMAM J JA SOND JFMAM J JA
Reserve tissue ^ Germinal tissue Q Others
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
B
Figure 3. Seasonal variation of germinal and reserve tissues in Perna perna (A) and Mytilus gallo-
provincialis (B) in the polluted site. (VC: vesicular cells storing glycogen; ADGC: adipogranular
cells, containing glycogen, lipids and proteins).
Figura 3. Variación estacional de los tejidos germinal y de reservas en Perna perna (A) y Mytilus gallo-
provincialis (B) en el sitio contaminado. (VC: células vesiculares almacenando glucógeno; ADG: células
adip ogranulares, conteniendo glucógeno, lípidos y proteínas).
ONDJFMAMJ JASONDJFMAMJ JA
¡H ADGC H VC ^ Germinal tissue Q Others
In the polluted site (Fig. 4B), the dif-
ference between the mean amount of
glycogen in the two species (39.75 and
23.44 mg/g FW in P. perna and Mytilus
galloprovincialis respectively) is not sig-
nificant (F= 6.257 and P= 0.130). Other-
wise, their seasonal variation are signifi-
cantly different (F= 4.03 and P= 10'6 in
P. perna and F= 9.78 and P= 10~7 in M.
galloprovincialis). The seasonal profile is
completely different for the two mol-
luscs: For P. perna , it presents three
peaks, the first in June (96.05 mg/ g FW),
the second in November (118.87 mg/g
FW) and the third in May of second year
(159.02 mg/g FW). For M. galloprovin-
cialis, only two peaks are recovered
65.03 and 153.64 mg/g FW respectively
in May and November of the first year.
The comparison of valúes for refer-
ence and polluted site animáis shows a
significant difference. The valúes in the
polluted site are less important (39.8 ±
13.36 instead of 59.6 ± 7.36 mg/g FW in
22
Moukrim ET AL Reserves strategy of mussels in Moroccan coasts
P perna ▲ M. galloprovincialis
Month
Figure 4. Seasonal variation of glycogen in the mantle of Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis
in the reference site (A) and the polluted site (B)
Figura 4. Variación estacional del glucógeno el el manto de Perna perna y Mytilus galloprovincialis en
el sitio de referencia (A) y en el sitio contaminado (B)
the reference site, for Perna perna). More-
over, the seasonal profile of glycogen
contení (Fig. 4B) presents some pertur-
bations compared to the reference site.
Lipids : A significant difference was
noted between the mean amounts of total
lipids in the two mussels species (92.86
and 125.04 mg/g FW in P. perna and
Mytilus galloprovincialis respectively).
However, the difference of their seasonal
variation are significant with F= 4.42 and
P= 10'6 in P. perna and F= 3.6 and P=
4.5xl0'5 in M. galloprovincialis. In the first
year, the seasonal profile (Fig. 5A) is similar
for the two molluscs. The lipid contení
increased in autumn, with a maximal valué
in December (respectively 354.3 and 316.9
mg/ g FW in Perna perna and Mytilus gal-
loprovincialis), and decreased in winter and
spring. However, in the second year, a
slight increase was noted in summer (June
- July) only in P. perna.
In the polluted site, the two species
present a significant difference between
total lipids mean valúes (respectively
231.4 ± 21.47 and 135.5 ± 16.93 mg/g
FW in Perna perna and Mytilus gallo-
provincialis). Besides, the difference in
their seasonal variation (Fig. 5B) is sig-
nificant with F= 2.59 and P= 0.002 in P.
perna and F= 3.60 and P= 4.5xl0"4 in M.
galloprovincialis.
Ótherwise, the valúes are generally
higher for the polluted site than the ref-
erence site for the two species. More-
over, compared to the unpolluted site,
the seasonal variation (Fig. 5B) shows a
perturbed profile with several peaks
during the annual cycle and a máximum
valúes is reached rather in August
(777.03 mg/ g FW in P. perna and 659.95
mg/g FW in M. galloprovincialis).
Proteins : The mean contení of protein
is significantly higher in Perna perna (28.9
23
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
P. perna a M. galloprovincialis
Month
Figure 5. Seasonal variation of lipids in the mantle of Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis in
the reference site (A) and the polluted site (B).
Figura 5. Variación estacional de los lípidos en el manto de Perna perna y Mytilus galloprovincialis en
el sitio de referencia (A) y en el sitio contaminado (B).
± 3.51 mg/g FW) compared to Mytilus
galloprovincialis (20.2 ± 3.17 mg/g FW).
However, the seasonal profile (Fig. 6A) is
similar for the two species. The maximal
valúes were generally recorded in
summer and autumn in the first year
and in winter and beginning spring in
the second year, whereas the minimal
valúes were reached at the end of
autumn and the beginning of winter.
In the polluted site (Fig. 6B), the
mean amount of protein is higher in P.
perna (30.11 ± 7.742 mg/g FW) than in
M. galloprovincialis (19.74 mg/g FW).
However, the mean valúes and the sea-
sonal profile do not show any signifi-
cant difference compared with those
observed from the reference site (F= 1.08
and P= 0.30 for Perna perna ; F= 0.31 and
P= 0.57 for Mytilus galloprovincialis ). For
the two species, the máximum valúes
were recorded in summer and autumn.
DISCUSSION
The comparative study of the
reserve pattern of the two mussels
species living in the Moroccan coasts,
Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis,
sampled in the same site (Cap Ghir,
Agadir bay), shows that, in spite of the
difference in their reserve tissues (only
one cell type, vesicular cells, in Perna
perna ; two cell types, adipogranular
cells and vesicular cells, in Mytilus gallo-
provincialis), the two molluscs have a
similar fluctuation.
This strategy presents cycles (of re-
serve compounds and cells involved in
the storage) which, compared to the cy-
cle of reproduction (determined in these
same animáis by Id Halla et al., 1997)
are inversely proportional to it. The ac-
cumulation of reserves in these cells is
related to the period of reduced sexual
24
Moukrim ET AL. : Reserves strategy of mussels in Moroccan coasts
P. perna a M. galloprovincialis
Figure 6. Seasonal variation of proteins in the mantle of Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis
in the reference site (A) and the polluted site (B).
Figura 6. Variación estacional de las proteínas el manto de Perna perna y Mytilus galloprovincialis en
el sitio de referencia (A) y en el sitio contaminado (B).
activity (in summer). The low levels of
reserve are obtained in autumn and par-
ticularly in winter (gametogenesis and
spawning periods). Similar results have
been reported in Perna perna from
Brazilian coasts (Lunetta, 1969) and in
Mytilus galloprovincialis from the French
coasts (Herlin-Houtteville, 1974;
Danton, Kiymoto, Komaru, Wada,
Awaji and Mathieu, 1996). Also, in the
Ria de Vigo (Spain), the profile of the
variations of the gonadic Índex and so-
matic Índex in cultured mussels show
clearly their inverse and gradual fluctu-
ations (Cáceres-Martínez and
Figueras, 1998). This association be-
tween gonad and storage tissue cycles
in mussels is well known. Decline of the
ADG cells occurs during gametogenesis
by a lysosomal autophagic mechanism
(Bayne et al., 1982; Lowe, Moore and
Bayne; 1982; Pipe, 1987). The energy
used in gonad restoration following
spawning during spring and summer
probably derived directly from feeding
since ADG cells disappeared from the
mantle in early spring (Villalba, 1995).
Furthermore, the reserve accumula-
tion in the two mollusc species is related
to the proliferation of the phytoplanc-
tonic biomass linked to upwelling cur-
rents which take place, between Febru-
ary and August, in the Agadir bay and
more precisely in Cap Ghir (Belveze,
1984 ; Agoumi and Orbi, 1992).
Cáceres-Martínez and Figueras
(1998) reported that this increase in food
availability for mussels in the area
favours the accumulation of reserves
during this period. These results also
confirm the cióse dependence, described
by Mathieu (1987), between the reserve
storage and environmental conditions in
marine ecosystems. As suggested by
25
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
this author, the disappearance of reserve
tissue in mussels seems to be under
endocrine control via cerebroid ganglia
which provoke disappearance of adi-
pogranular cells and vesicular cells in
the mantle after liberation of their
reserves which are indispensable for
gametogenesis and spawning process.
The synchronic character of this disap-
pearance, in Perna yerna and Mytilus gal-
loyrovincialis, could be explained by the
existence of the same mechanism for the
control of reserves in both species.
The comparison of the reserve com-
pounds in the two molluscs shows that
the glycogen, total lipids and proteins
contents are higher in Perna yerna (in
spite of the presence of only one type of
reserve storage cells, vesicular cells)
compared to Mytilus galloyrovincialis.
These results could explain the differ-
ences observed by Id Halla et al.
(1997) between the reproductive cycles
of these bivalves. According to these
authors, in Perna yerna, compared to
Mytilus galloyrovincialis, the main-
spawning period in spring is longer and
the sexual activity in summer is
reduced. Otherwise, the important
reserve levels in this species could be
attributed to the spatial distribution of
each species: Perna yerna lives essen-
tially at the infra-littoral level and is
more immersed than Mytilus galloyrovin-
cialis (Id Halla et al., 1997) and, conse-
quently, has access to more nutrients,
thus allowing the synthesis and storage
of more reserves. Seed (1976) showed
that the gonadal development was
faster in mussels from the low intertidal
zone, than in those from the upper zone
and related these results to food avail-
ability. Other studies associated local
variations in gonadal cycle with envi-
ronmental conditions (Ferrán, 1991;
Villalba, 1995). According to Cáceres-
Martínez and Figueras (1998), there is
no influence of locality and depth in the
gonadal development of cultured
mussels.
The seasonal profile of the biochemi-
cal reserves studied shows that the first
peak of glycogen and lipids, recorded in
summer, is related to the occurrence of
upwelling currents which provide food
availability, ensuring an abundant
planktonic food supply for mussels.
According to Cáceres-Martínez and
Figueras (1998), massive spawns occur
in spring coinciding with an increase in
temperature and chlorophyll-a concen-
traron in the area providing favorable
conditions for larval growth. In winter,
the second peak of lipids coincides with
the maturity period of gametes. This
peak takes place just after the disap-
pearance of the glycogen peak. It is
probably a result of the glycogen trans-
formaron. The metabolic conversión of
glycogen to lipids has been reported by
Zaba and Davies (1980), using 14C-
glucose. According to Gosling (1992),
the mantle is considered as the organ of
many and extensive metabolic transfor-
mations during the sexual cycle. The
reserves, particularly the glycogen,
accumulated during summer, are used
in autumn and winter for the gametoge-
nesis. Similar results were reported by
Shafee (1989) in Perna yicta of Temara
(North of Morocco).
In the polluted site (Anza), many
perturbations in the metabolism of
reserves were noted comparatively to
the reference site (Cap Ghir). The
reserve tissues, which disappeared in
winter and at the beginning of spring, in
mussels of Cap Ghir, persist throughout
the sexual cycle in Anza mussels. This
could probably be a result of the pollu-
tion effect on the cerebroid ganglions
neurosecretions which are, according to
Lubet, Herlin, Mathieu, and Collin
(1976) and Mathieu (1987) involved in
the control of reserve cells.
The analysis of the seasonal profile
of the reserve levels in mussels sampled
in the polluted site shows some pertur-
bations as compared to the reference
site. For example, the glycogen content
is low in summer (August), in spite of
the availability of phytoplanctonic
biomass in this period. This is probably
linked to the stress caused by pollution
of industrial and domestic waste waters
discharged directly in this site, without
any treatment. This fact was indicated
by Deslous-Paoli, Wolowicz, and
26
Moukrim ET AL.: Reserves strategy of mussels in Moroccan coasts
Boromthanarat (1991) who reported
that, in Mytilus edulis, reserves could be
used both in reproductive process and
to overeóme the hard environmental
conditions. According to Thompson
(1972) the reserves are used in order to
reach the basal level of energy necessary
for stressed animáis.
Contrary to the glycogen, the total
lipids are more important in Perna yerna
and Mytilus galloprovincialis living in
Anza (polluted site). This could be
explained by an eventual direct assimi-
lation of lipids from the organic matter
of waste waters and/or a change of the
reserve storage process. According to
Gosling (1992) the lipid storage process
in molluscs is considerably linked to the
environmental conditions, particularly
to the presence of pollutants.
As a general conclusión, in the two
species of mussel P. yerna (with only
vesicular cells) and M. galloprovincialis
(with adipogranular cells and vesicular
cells), the respective germinal and
reserve tissues clearly show their
inverse and gradual profile. Their sea-
sonal fluctuations are similar in the two
molluscs. In the polluted site, many per-
turbations of the reserve metabolism
were noted comparatively to the refer-
ence site. Then, contrary to animáis of
this latter site, which presented a glyco-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agoumi, A. and Orbi, A., 1992. Evolution
météorologique et upwelling le long de la cote
atlantique marocaine. Hydroécologie Appliquée,
2 (4): 149-158.
Bayne, B. L., Bubel, A., Gabbott, P. A., Liv-
INGSTONE, D. R., LOWE, D. M. AND MOORE,
M. N., 1982. Glycogen utilisation and game-
togenesis in Mytilus edulis L. Marine Biology
Letters, 3: 89-105.
Belveze, H., 1984. Biologie et dynamique des pop-
ulations de la sardine (Sardina pilchardus Wal-
baum) peuplant les cotes atlantiques du Maroc.
Thése de Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Bre-
tagne Occidentale, Brest: 229 pp.
Cáceres-Martínez, J. and Figueras, A., 1998.
Long-term survey on wild and cultured mus-
sels ( Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk.) repro-
ductive eyeles in the Ria de Vigo (NW. Spain).
Aquaculture, 162: 141-156.
genic strategy, a lipidie strategy takes
place in molluscs of the polluted site.
The results obtained in this work
constitute a contribution to the knowl-
edge of the reserve strategy in the two
species living along Moroccan coasts, the
African mussel Perna yerna and the
Mediterranean mussel Mytilus gallo-
yrovincialis. So, several faets are reported:
i) the type, the seasonal variation and the
eyele of the reserve strategy in the two
molluscs, ii) cells involved in the storage,
iii) the relationship between the reserve
strategy and the reproduction eyele, and
iv) the response of this strategy to the
environmental conditions. Nevertheless,
it would be interesting to identify the
mechanism and the control process of
the reserve strategy in these molluscs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Miss Joanne
Preston (Southampton University, UK)
and Mrs Barbara Picot (Angers Univer-
sity, France) for their Language correc-
tions. We thank the IFS (Sweden),
AUPELF (Cañada), Ministére des
Affaires Etrangéres (France) and Min-
istére de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de
la Recherche Scientifique (Morocco), for
their financial assistance.
Danton, E., Kiymoto, M., Komaru, A., Wada,
K. T., Awaji M. and Mathieu, M., 1996.
Comparative analysis of storage tissue and
insulin-like neurosecretion in diploid an
triploid mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk.
in relation to their gametogenesis eyele. In-
vertébrate Reprodution and Development, 29:
37-46.
Deslous-Paoli, J. M., Wolowicz, M. and
Boromthanarat, S., 1991. Les réserves én-
ergétiques de Mytilus edulis: Comparaison
des stratégies développées dans le baie de
Gdansk (Pologne) et le bassin de Marennes-
Oleron (France). Haliotis, 21: 19-28.
Duchateau, G. H. and Florkin, M., 1959. Sur
la tréhalosémie des insectes et sa signification.
Archives Internationales de Physiologie , de
Biochimie et de Biophysique, 67: 306-314.
27
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Ferrán, A. E., 1991. Ciclo gonadal y del tejido de
reserva del mejillón de las Rías de Galicia Mytilus
galloprovincialis Lmk. Tesis Doctoral, Uni-
versidad de Santiago de Compostela, Es-
paña, 229 pp.
Folch, ]., Lees, M. and Sloane-Stanley, G. H.,
1957. A single method for the isolation and
purification of total lipids from animal tissues.
Journal of Biológica! Chemistry, 226: 497-509.
Gosling, E., 1992. The mussel Mytilus: Ecology,
Physiology, Genetics and Culture. Develop-
ments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science,
25. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 565 pp.
EIerlin-Houtteville, P., 1974. Contribution a l'é-
tude cytologique et expérimentale du cycle du
tissu de reserve diez la moule Mytilus edulis L.
Thése de 3éme cycle. Université de Caen: 99
pp.
Id Halla, M., 1997. Etude de la biologie des moules
Perna perna Einné (1758) et Mytilus gallo-
provincialis Eamarck (1819) dans la baie d'A-
gadir. Thése de 3éme cycle. Faculté des Sci-
ences, Agadir: 157 pp.
Id Halla, M., Bouhaimi, A., Zekhnini, A.,
Narbonne, J. F., Mathieu, M. and Moukrim,
A., 1997. Etude du cycle de reproduction de
deux espéces de moules Perna perna (Linné,
1758) et Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck,
1819) dans la baie d'Agadir (Sud du Maroc).
Haliotis, 26: 51-62.
Kaaya, A., Najimi, S., Ribera, D., Narbonne,
J. F. and Moukrim, A.,1999. Characterization
of glutathione S-transferases (GST) activities
in Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis -
used as biomarker of pollution in the Agadir
marine bay (South of Morocco). Bulletin ofEn-
vironmental Contamination and Toxicology, 62:
623-929.
Lowe, D. M., Moore, M. N. and Bayne, B. L.,
1982. Aspects of gametogenesis in the marine
mussel Mytilus edulis L. Journal ofthe Marine
Biological Association ofthe United Kingdom, 62:
133-145.
Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. ]., Farr, A.
and Randall, R. ]., 1951. Protein measure-
ment with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal
of Biological Chemistry, 193: 265-275.
Lubet, P., 1959. Recherches sur le cycle sexuel et
l'émission des gamétes chez les Mytilidés et les
Pectinidés. Thése de 3éme cycle, Université de
Paris: 159 pp.
Lubet, P., Herlin, P., Mathieu, M. and Collin,
F., 1976. Tissu de réserve et cycle sexuel chez
les lamellibranches. Haliotis, 7: 59-62.
Lunetta, J. E., 1969. Fisiología da reproducáo
dos mexilhóes ( Mytilus perna L.) Mollusca
Lamellibranchia). Boletins da Faculdade de
Filosofía, Ciencias e Tetras, Universidade de Sao
Paulo, Zoología e Biología Marinha, N.S. 26: 33-
111.
Mathieu, M., 1987. Etude expérimentale des con-
troles exercés par les ganglions nerveux sur la
gamétogénése et les processus métaboliques as-
sociés chez la moule Mytilus edulis L. (Mol-
lusque lamellibranche) . Thése de Doctorat d'É-
tat, Université de Caen, France: 219 pp.
Moukrim, A., Kaaya, A., Najimi S., Roméo, M.,
Gnassia-Barelli, M. and Narbonne, J. F.,
2000. Assessment of the trace metáis level in
two species of mussels from the Agadir ma-
rine bay (South of Morocco). Bulletin ofEn-
vironmental Contamination and Toxicology, 65:
478-485.
Kaaya, A., 2002. Contribution d Vévaluation de l'é-
tat de santé de la baie d'Agadir: Etude de la
physico-chimie du milieu et de certains biomar-
queurs chez Mytilus galloprovincialis et Perna
perna (stratégie de réserve, bioaccumulation mé-
tallique et enzymes de biotransformation). Thése
de Doctorat d'État, Université Ibn Zohr,
Agadir, Maroc: 187 pp.
Najimi, S., Bouhaimi, A., Daubéze, M.,
Zekhnini, A., Pellerin, ]., Narbonne, J. F.
and Moukrim, A., 1997. Use of acetyl-
cholinesterase in Perna perna and Mytilus gal-
loprovincialis as a biomarker of pollution in
Agadir marine bay (South of Morocco). Bul-
letin ofEnvironmental Contamination and Tox-
icology, 58: 901-908.
Pipe, R. K., 1987. Ultrastructural and cyto-
chemical study on interactions between nu-
trient storage cells and gametogenesis in the
mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 96: 519-
528.
Seed, R., 1976. Ecology. In Bayne, B. L. (Ed.): Ma-
rine Mussels. Their Ecology and Physiology.
Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 13-
65 pp.
Shafee, M. S., 1989. Reproduction of Perna
perna (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the atlantic
coast of Morocco. Marine Ecology Progress Se-
ries, 53: 235-245.
Thomspon, R. ]., 1972. Feeding and metabolism
in the mussel Mytilus edulis L. Ph.D Thesis,
University of Leicester: 186 pp.
Villalba, A., 1995. Gametogenic cycle of cul-
tured mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis, in the
bays of Galicia (NW Spain). Aquaculture, 130:
269-277.
Weibel, E. R., Kistler, G. S. and Scherle, W.
F., 1966. Practical stereological methods for
morphometric cytology. Journal ofCell Biol-
ogy, 30: 23-38.
Zaba, B. N. and Davies, J. ]., 1980. Glucose
metabolism in an in-vitro preparation of the
mantle tissue from Mytilus edulis L. Marine
Biology Eetters, 1: 235-243.
28
Iberus, 26 (1): 29-42, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Reproduction of the cockle Cerastoderma edule (Linné,
1758) in the estuary of Oued Souss (southwestern Morocco)
Reproducción del berberecho Cerastoderma edule (Linné, 1758) en
el estuario del Oued Souss (suroeste de Marruecos)
Hafida BERGAYOU**, Abdellatif MOUKRIM*1, Michel MATHIEU** and
Jean-Pierre GIMAZANE**
Recibido el 14-11-2006. Aceptado el 3 l-X-2007
ABSTRACT
Field and laboratory investigations were carried out from 2001 to 2003 on a population
of Cerastoderma edule living ¡n the estuary of Oued Souss, ¡n order to determine the
impact of domestic wastewater discharges on the biology of this species. During waste-
water discharges, several episodes of partial spawning occurred from November to
March, followed by another in April-May. The main spawning occurred nevertheless in
August. The gonadic Índex was always higher than 1, so that the period of sexual rest
was short. The period of recruitment (from June to October) was mainly correlated with
spawning peaks. The renewal of the population was ensured by the recruitment of June-
July, whereas young cockles recruited from August to October only represented 9.2% of
the population at the end of autumn. Most 1-year-old cockles disappeared during the sum-
mer of the second year following their recruitment. After wastewater pollution stopped, an
important recruitment of young cockles occurred. The spatial distribution of this species
progressed upstream and the biomass of cockles had strongly increased. Because of its
reproduction which takes place throughout the year, C. edule , as an opportunistic
species, succeeded in colonizing this site.
RESUMEN
Se realizaron, entre 2001 y 2003, estudios de campo y de laboratorio sobre una pobla-
ción de Cerastoderma edule del estuario del Oued Souss, con el objetivo de determinar el
impacto de los vertidos de aguas residuales sobre la biología de esta especie. Coinci-
diendo con los vertidos, se produjeron varios episodios de puesta parcial entre Noviem-
bre y Marzo, seguidos de otro en Abril-Mayo. La puesta principal, sin embargo, se pro-
dujo en Agosto. El índice gonádico fue siempre superior a 1 , indicando que el periodo de
reposo sexual fue corto. El periodo de reclutamiento (de Junio a Octubre) estuvo esencial-
mente relacionado con picos de puesta. La reposición de la población fue asegurada por
el reclutamiento de Junio-Julio, mientras berberechos jóvenes reclutados entre Agosto y
Noviembre representaban tan solo el 9,2% de la población a finales de otoño. La mayor
parte de los berberechos con un año de edad desaparecieron durante el verano del
segundo año después de su reclutamiento. Al finalizar los vertidos se produjo un impor-
tante reclutamiento de berberechos jóvenes. La especie se extendió río arriba y la bio-
* Laboratory Aquatic Ecosystems : Marine and Continental Field, Biology Department, Sciences Faculty, Ibn
Zohr University, BP 8106, 80000, Agadir, Morocco.
** Laboratory of Marine Biology and Biotechnology, University of Caen, F- 14000, Caen, France.
1 Corresponding author
29
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
masa de berberechos aumento fuertemente. Por su reproducción que se extiende sobre
todo el año, C. edule, como especie oportunista, fue exitosa en la colonización de este
lugar.
KEY WORDS: Cerastoderma edule, estuary, Oued Souss river, pollütion, recruitment, reproductive cycle, waste-
water discharges.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Cerastoderma edule, estuario, Oued Souss, contaminación, reclutamiento, ciclo reproductor,
INTRODUCTION
In marine environment, many biotic
and abiotic factors may influence the life
cycle of bivalves. If temperature, salin-
ity, food supply, and tidal exposure are
the most important causes known to
modulate development in mytilids
(Seed, 1975), other elements, such as
intraspecific competition or environ-
mental contaminants, can result in great
variations in growth rate of bivalves
(Seed and Suchanek, 1992). These
factors also have an effect on the repro-
duction, settlement, recruitment, and
production of these molluscs so that
their variations directly affect the devel-
opment of beds for each species of
bivalve (Widdows and Donkin, 1992).
Contrary to numerous ecological
reports on the effects of contaminants on
different marine bivalves, the recovery
of mollusc populations after the disap-
pearance of pollütion has been less
investigated.
The implantation of a wastewater pu-
rification plant since November 2002
along the estuary of Oued Souss, at 4 km
from the mouth of the estuary, had re-
sulted in the fact that the fresh water still
running in the river and the decanted
wastewater were no longer discharged in
the estuary but diverted to another
Coastal site: M'Zar, located at 3 km south.
For this reason, the estuary, upstream to
the purification plant, was only swept by
sea tide at the present time.
As there existed a population of
Cerastoderma edule living in the estuary
of the Oued Souss river, it was interest-
ing to determine the physiological State
of these cockles during the pollütion
period by wastewater and the changes
which have occurred after this contami-
nation stopped. In view of these objec-
tives, the following two questions aróse:
Had the discharge of wastewater before
November 2002 caused repercussions
on the reproductive cycle of C. edule and
on the dynamics of this population?
What consequences did the presence of
sea water in the estuary after November
2002 have on the spatial distribution
and biomass of C. edule? To answer the
first question, monthly investigations
from January 2001 to December 2002
were carried out in the habitat of C.
edule i) to follow the different stages of
sexual maturity in males and females,
and ii) to specify the development of the
different generations and cohorts of
cockles. To tackle the second question,
two surveys in 2002 and 2003 during
summer months were performed in the
estuary of Oued Souss river.
This study complements other
reports made by our research team in
the same ecosystem (Mouneyrac, Pel-
LERIN, MOUKRIM, AlT ALLA, DUROU AND
Viault, 2005; Ait Allá, Mouneyrac,
Durou, Moukrim and Pellerin, 2005;
Ait Allá, Gillet, Deutsch, Moukrim
and Bergayou, 2005; Bergayou and
Moukrim, 2003 and Gillet, Gorman,
Tallec, Moukrim, Mouloud, Anajjar,
Ait Allá, Bergayou and Kaaya, 2003).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The estuary of Oued Souss is located
on the Atlantic coast, in southwestern
Morocco and is subjected to an arid
climate. The mouth is swept by an
intense marine hydrodynamism,
responsible of the presence of great
30
Bergayou ET AL.: Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Southwestern Morocco
Figure 1 . Location of sampling sites along the estuary of Oued Souss in the Bay of Agadir, south-
western Morocco.
Figura 1. Situación de las localidades de maestreo a lo largo del estuario del Oued Souss, en la bahía de
Agadir, suroeste de Marruecos.
sandbanks in the estuary, with currents
linked to high or low tides, and with
high salinity (from 31.2 to 34.2 %o).
Reproductive cycle
The study of reproductive cycle and
population dynamics for C. edule were
carried out at station 2 (30° 21.97'N
north, 9o 35.98'W west), (Fig. 1). Selected
because of its high biomass of the cockle
population, this station was character-
ized by fine silty sand 2-5% of organic
matter in the substratum and 340-440
mg/1 of suspended matter in the water.
Two methods for studying the repro-
ductive cycle of C. edule were used. The
first was a classical histological study of
gonads and was performed from
January 2001 to March 2002. The second
was a complementary study of condi-
tion Índex and microscopic examination
of gonad smears (Guillou, Bachelet,
and Glémarec, 1991) and was per-
formed from August 2001 to August
2002. For the first and second study.
respectively, 30 and 100 cockles (length,
20 to 30 mm) were collected by hand at
low tide, at monthly intervals (respec-
tively, a total of about 450 and 1300
accumulated cockles was examined).
For the first study (histological study
of gonads), the shells of C. edule were
opened and soft masses were prefixed
in the Gendre's fixative for 24 h. In the
laboratory, the shell of each bivalve was
removed and small pieces of soft masses
were post-fixed in a new solution of
Gendre's fixative for 48 h before being
dehydrated through a graded series of
ethanol and butanol, and finally embed-
ded in cytoparaffin (56°-58°C). Serial
sections (thickness, 5 pm) were made
before being stained with Gabe's
trichrome, hemalun-eosin, or Mann-
Dominici's method (Gabe, 1968). The
maturity of gonads was determined
using the scale proposed by Lubet
(1959) for Mytilus edulis (Table I).
The gonadic Índex (Seed, 1975) indi-
cates the State of gonad maturity for
31
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Table I. Terminology used by LUBET (1959) and LUCAS (1965) to study morphologically and his-
tologically the gonadic developmental stages in bivalves.
Tabla I. Terminología empleada por Lubet (1959) y Lucas (1965) para el estudio morfológico y his-
tológico de estadios de desarrollo gonadal en bivalvos.
32
Bergayou ET AL.: Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Southwestern Morocco
size class (20-30 mm) was considered
and 30 bivalves were randomly chosen
to determine this condition Índex. The
índex selected was that proposed by
Lucas and Beninger (1985): IC = [(dry
weight of soft masses) / (dry weight of
valves) x 1000]. The dry weight was
obtained using a dehydration of soft
masses (or shell) in a desiccator (60°C,
24 h).
Population dynamics
To study the dynamics of the popu-
lation and to specify the period of juve-
nile recruitment, samplings of C. edule
were performed from January to
December 2002. This study was also
carried out in the station 2. Monthly,
sixteen sediment samples (surface,
0.0625 m2, height, 20 cm) were collected
at low tide according to the method of
quadrats used by Elliott and Decamps
(1973, in Bayed, 1982). These samples
were sieved (square meshes, 1 mm) to
recover and count cockles. The antero-
posterior length of each cockle was mea-
sured using a calliper rule (precisión, 0.1
mm). For mollusc sizes less than 5 mm,
a stereomicroscope equipped with a
micrometric ocular was used. The indi-
vidual valúes recorded for the length of
bivalves and sampling dates were com-
pared using the FISAT software
(Gayanilo, Sparke and Pauly, 1996) to
draw size histograms in relation to the
frequency of animáis and to make a
modal analysis based on the algorithm
according to the method by Battacharya
(1967). This comparison, with the use of
the x2 test (at P<0.05) allows to distin-
guish the different size classes in each
monthly sample, to determine mollusc
densities, and to specify recruitment
periods.
Spatial distribution, density and
biomass
To determine the spatial distribu-
tion, density, and biomass (ash-free dry
weight, AFDW) of cockles, two surveys
were carried out in 2002 and 2003
(during summer period). The replication
of this study during these two periods
(in 2002, when the estuary received the
wastewater, and in 2003, when the dis-
charge stopped) gives insights on the
wastewater pollution impact and the
reestablishment of the ecosystem when
this pollution stopped. These investiga-
tions were made in a total of 8 stations
(27 sampling sites) located at 400-500 m
intervals from the estuary mouth up to
the wastewater outlet (Fig. 1). In each
site, four to six sediment samples
(surface, 0.0625 m2, height, 20 cm) were
collected at low tide according to the
method of quadrats used by Elliott
and Decamps (1973, in Bayed, 1982).
These samples were sieved (square
meshes, 1 mm) to recupérate and count
cockles, as above.
Ash-free dry weight (AFDW) was
determined by dipping molluscs in a
solution of 10% HC1 until the shell was
completely dissolved. Then, the soft
parts were dried for 48 h at 80°C,
weighed, placed at 600°C for 2 h and
weighed again. The weight loss at 600°C
was considered to represent the AFDW
of individuáis and was expressed in
g/m2 (Bachelet, Bouchet and
Lissalde, 1980-1981).
RESULTS
Effects of pollution on the biology
of the species
Reproductive cycle: The study of
gonad smears from August 2001 to
August 2002 had allowed to recognize
sex in 1138 bivalves (87.5%). Within this
group, the sex ratio of C. edule was
51.1% ± 2.6%, and was well-balanced at
1:1 (x2 = 2.5, P < 0.05). No hermaphro-
dite individuáis were found in this pop-
ulation. In September, the A stage
(undetectable sex) was observed in 75%
of cockles and might correspond to a
previtellogenic phase rather than a
sexual rest, as the percentage of C. edule
showing the C stage (gonad maturation)
increased in October to reach about 50%
in November. The frequency of C stage
was above 50% between November and
April (Fig. 2A), and subsequently
decreased in May (from 75 to 20%), thus
corresponding to a slight decrease of the
33
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Figure 2. Distribution of sexual-development stages (A) according to the scale of LUCAS (1965) and
annual cycle of condition indexes (B) in the populations of C. edule studied from August 2001 to
August 2002. The cumulated frequencies of the different sexual-development stages corresponded to
the total of bivalves studied (100%). For details of each stage, see Materials and Methods (Table I).
Figura 2. Distribución de los estadios de desarrollo sexual (A) según la escala de LUCAS (1965) y ciclo
anual de índices de condición (B) en las poblaciones de C. edule estudiadas entre agosto 2001 y agosto
2002. Las frecuencias acumuladas de distintos estadios de desarrollo sexual corresponden al total de
bivalvos estudiados ( 1 00%). Véase Material y Métodos (Tabla L) para los detalles de cada estadio.
condition Índex (Fig. 2B). An episode of
pardal spawning had thus occurred
during this last period. In May, the fre-
quency of the D stage (80%) proved that
gametogenesis had resumed. In June
and July, the C stage was the most fre-
quent (65 to 75%) and was followed in
August by a more marked decrease of
the condition Índex (from 80 to 50 %o)
thus indicating an important release of
gametes. It may be concluded that two
periods of gamete maturation (C stage),
the first ranging from November to
April and the other occurring in June-
July, were differentiated.
The histological study was carried
out over a longer period of time (January
2001- March 2002) than the analysis of
gonad smears. Mature gonads (IIIA
stage) were often observed on more than
50% of cockles studied from January to
April (Fig. 3). Episodes of pardal spawn-
ing occurred from January to March; fol-
lowed by another spawning in April and
May (in May, the IIIB stage was noted in
60% of males, Fig. 3A). The reconstitu-
tion of the gonad (IIIC stage) is more
marked in females (Fig. 3B) in May
(80%) and seems more precocious in
males. In both sexes, this stage devel-
oped in parallel from May to July so that
pardal spawning occurred during these
months. In August, the IIIB stage was
preponderant in both sexes (80% of
34
Bergayou ET AL.: Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Southwestern Morocco
A
B
2001 Months 2002
2001 Months 2002
Figure 3. Distribution of gonadic-development stages over 2001-2002 in the males (A) and females
(B) of C. edule. The cumulated frequencies of the different developmental stages corresponded to
the whole bivalves studied (100%). For details of each stage, see Materials and Methods (Table I).
Figura 3. Distribución de los estadios de desarrollo gonadal sobre el periodo 2001-2001 en machos (A) y
hembras (B) de C. edule. Las frecuencias acumuladas de distintos estadios de desarrollo sexual corre-
sponden al total de bivalvos estudiados (100%). Véase Material y Métodos (Tabla I) para los detalles de
cada estadio.
males, 60% of females), proving that the
main spawning episode had happened.
The resorption of gonads (IIID stage)
was observed in a few individuáis after
the spawning of May and was less than
25% from June to August. Several
females in IIID stage were noted during
the other months, but they never
exceeded 5%. In September, gametogen-
esis started in both sexes (I and II stages
were found in 95% of cockles). The mat-
uration of the gonad (IIIA stage) was
observed in the first bivalves from
October to December and partial spawn-
ing occurred from November to March.
The highest valúes (2.7) of the
gonadic Índex (Fig. 4) were noted
between January and April, thus con-
firming the presence of ripe gonads
during this period. The lowest valúes
(1.7) were found from June to August. In
both sexes, the gonadic Índex was
always higher than 1 so that the period
of sexual rest was short.
Gametogenesis in the population of C.
edule: Figure 5 gives the results of stere-
ological analysis. From January to
March, the percentages of mature
gametes increased to peak in April.
Another episode of gametogenesis
began in May, as demonstrated by the
high frequencies of young germinal cells
during this month in both sexes. In
males, the effect of this developing sper-
35
Iberas, 26 (1), 2008
—°"“a — b
Figure 4. Annual cycle of the gonadic Índex in the males (A) and females (B) of C. edule over
2001-2002.
Figura 4. Ciclo anual del índice gonádico en machos (a) y hembras (b) de C. edule en el periodo 2001-
2002.
matogenesis was high rates of sper-
matids and spermatozoa in June or
August (grouped frequencies, 75% and
85%, respectively). In females, an impor-
tant vitellogenesis was observed in May
and June so that the highest frequency
of mature oocytes (55%) was noted in
July and that of degenerated oocytes
(60%) in August. In September, the
highest percentages of spermatogoniae
(29%) in males and of oogoniae (37%) in
females were noted, thus indicating the
starting of another gametogenetic wave.
From September to December, the
gonadic tissue of males was important,
as the grouped frequencies of spermato-
goniae and of spermatocytes were more
than 47%. The same finding was noted
in females during this period (grouped
rates of oogoniae and of vitellogenic
oocytes, >70%). Low percentages of
atresic oocytes (5-25%) were always
observed in females throughout the
year.
From the above study, it can be con-
cluded that three successive gametoge-
netic waves were differentiated: the first
one from January to April, the second
one from May to July, and the third one
from September to March. Ripe cockles
for both sexes were predominant from
January to April, in July, and from
January to March.
Population dynamics: The lengths of
C. edule , measured from January to
December 2002, are given in Figure 6.
The period of recruitment spanned from
the end of spring to the onset of
autumn. The first settlement of juvenile
cockles occurred in June. A second
cohort appeared in July, a third cohort in
August, and a fourth one in October. At
the end of autumn, the individuáis
recruited in June-July had a length of
18.3 ±1.8 mm and constituted 71.6% of
the population. By contrast, those origi-
nating from the grouped cohorts of
August and October only had a length
of 11.1 ± 1.1 mm and represented 9.2%
of the population. In addition to these
recruitments; a few young cockles (2-
3%) were found for each date of sam-
pling. In summer, there was a strong
decrease in the number of cockles mea-
suring 24.6 ±1.9 mm in length. This
diminution is followed by the almost
complete disappearance of adult cockles
just after the period of recruitment
(August 2002) so that the population of
C. edule in 2002 was mainly composed of
young individuáis which are being
renewed each year.
36
BERGAYOU ET AL. : Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Sourhwestern Morocco
■ Spz
Hfl Spc
EH3 Spg
B
JFMAMJ JASONDJFM
2001 Months 2002
Figure 5. Frequencies of different cell categories in the male (A) and female (B) gonads of C. edule
collected between January 2001 and March 2002. Male line: Spc (primary and secondary sperma-
tocytes), Spg (protogoniae and spermatogoniae), Spz (spermatids and spermatozoa) . Female line:
D (degenerated oocytes), Og (oogoniae), R (mature oocytes), V (vitellogenic oocytes). The cumu-
lated frequencies of the different cell categories corresponded to the whole bivalves studied (100%).
Figura 5. Frecuencia de distintas categorías de células en gónadas de machos (A) y hembras (B) de C.
edule recolectados entre enero 2001 y marzo 2002. En machos: Spc (Espermatocitos primarios y secun-
darios), Spg (protogonias y espermatogonias), Spz (espermatidios y espermatozoos); en hembras: D (ovoc-
itos degenerados), Og ( oogonias ), R (ovocitos maduros), V (ovocitos vitelogénicos). Las frecuencias acu-
muladas de distintos estadios de desarrollo sexual corresponden al total de bivalvos estudiados (1 00%).
Spatial distribution, biomass, and
structure of population of C. edule
before and after wastewater discharges
The spatial distribution of C. edule
along the estuary, its density and its
biomass are given in Table II for the
summer surveys (2002 and 2003).
During the period of wastewater dis-
charge, the species was confined down-
stream (stations 1 and 2). By contrast, in
2003, its distribution had extended with
an upstream penetration of cockles up
to the station 5. The density of C. edule
did not exceed 320 individuals/m2 in
2002, and strongly increased in 2003 to
reach valúes higher than 4,900
cockles/m2 in several places (these
valúes were found during the periods of
recruitment). The mean biomass
(AFDW) calculated on the cockle
samples collected during summer
surveys, increased from 2.54 g/m2 in
2002 to 14.87 g/m2 in 2003.
Table III shows the different groups
of cockles constituting the population in
summer surveys (2002 and 2003).
37
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Length (mm)
0 10 20 30
N=171
N=182
N=207
N=242
N=300
N=244
N=1 14
N=119
N=256
N=92
N=119
Figure 6. Size distribution of C. edule in the estuary of Oued Souss from January to December
2002 and the principal normal components. Month and numbers of individuáis measured (N) are
given for each sampling.
Figura 6. Distribución de tallas de C. edule en el estuario del Oued Souss entre enero y diciembre 2002
y componentes normales principales. Meses y número de ejemplares medidos (N) están indicados para
cada muestra.
During the wastewater discharges in the
estuary (July 2002), individuáis are dis-
tributed among four groups: two classes
with lowest lengths (6.81 ± 1.53 mm and
9.97 ± 0.83 mm), deriving from a recruit-
ment in May and June; and two classes
of oíd cockles (24,72 ±2.17 mm and 27.5
± 0,76 mm). In July 2003, the most fre-
quent group (89.2%) was composed of
young individuáis (length, 6.55 ± 1.17
mm; 11.76 ± 1.63 mm) originating from
a recruitment in May and June. Another
group of médium size (36.25 ± 1.73 mm)
appeared for the first time and probably
comprised cockles more than one year
oíd, as the absence of growth lines on
cockle valves did not allow to easily
identify the different age subgroups
constituting this last size group.
DISCUSSION
The results reported in the present
study on the gonochorism of C. edule
agree with the reports of several authors
(Gimazane, 1971; Kingston, 1974).
Several cases of accidental hermaphro-
dism (4%0) were also noted by Fernan-
dez Castro, Guillou, Le Pennec and
Cárdenas López (1989). In the estuary
of Oued Souss, the sex ratio of cockles
was well-balanced so that pollution did
not have an influence on the distribu-
tion of males and females. This finding
agrees with studies that some authors
have performed in other populations of
C. edule at different latitudes, such as the
report by Kingston (1974) along the
coasts of Kent (UK), that of Ivell (1981)
38
BERGAYOU ET AL.: Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Southwestern Morocco
Table II. Spatial distribution of C. edule along the estuary, its density and its Biomass (AFDWg
/ m2) during wastewater contamination (summer 2002) and after stopping of pollution (summer
2003).
Tabla II. Distribución espacial de C. edule a lo largodel estuario , su densidad y su biomasa (AFDW/m2)
durante vertidos de agua contaminada ( verano 2002) y después de poner fin a la contaminación ( vera-
no 2003).
in the Limfjord (Denmark), that of
Mejuto (1984) in Ria de Pasaxe (Spain),
or still that of Fernandez Castro,
Guillou, Le Pennec and Cárdenas
López (1989) at Brouennou (France).
Through methods used for repro-
ductive cycle analysis, complementary
and concordant results were noted. In
the year, two successive gametogenetic
waves, the first occurring from Septem-
ber to April and the second in May-July,
were differentiated in this population
and spawning periods staggered over
time. These phenomena can be
explained by an effect of latitude (Sola,
1997; Rodriguez-Rua, Prado, Romeo
and Bruzon, 2003) and, in particular,
by water temperature (Hugues, 1971).
When temperature was less than 10°C, it
induced early spawning, followed by
gonad reconstitution and a second
period of spawning.
The presence of atresic oocytes
observed throughout the year during
vitellogenesis, as mentioned by Lubet
(1991) is apparently a frequent phenom-
enon in bivalves noted in the start of
gametogenesis (first mature oocytes
degenerate), after partial spawnings and
in the end of a reproductive cycle.
The long period of cockle recruit-
ment (from June to October) in 2002 can
39
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Table III. Distribution of shell lengths for C. edule during summer surveys (2002 and 2003): prin-
cipal normal components.
Tabla III. Distribución de longitudes de conchas de C. edule durante muéstreos de verano (2002 y
2003): principales componentes normales.
be easily explained by spawning which
occurred from April to August and this
time was perfectly consistent with the
gonadic-development stages deter-
mined by the histological study of
gonads and the examination of gonad
smears. Contrary to juveniles recruited
in June-July which had a better develop-
ment, those settled from August to
October showed a great mortality. This
last result would not be related to
wastewater pollution, in agreement
with the reports by Madani (1989),
Sauriau (1992), Bachelet, Guillou
and Labourg (1992a), or with that by
Bachelet, Desprez, Ducrotoy,
Guillou, Labourg, Rybarczyk,
Sauriau, Elkaim and Glémarec
(1992b). According to these authors,
high mortalities of cockles were noted in
the recruitments which occurred at the
end of summer, in autumn, and in
winter. This mortality affected small-
sized (<10 mm) cockles and may be
explained by the almost complete
absence of energetic reserves (Sauriau,
1992) whereas the metabolism of young
cockles was changing (Gabbott, 1976).
By contrast, the disappearance of
medium-sized molluscs in 2002 coin-
cided with the period of summer
recruitment. This finding might be
explained, either by a great predation of
cockles by Haematopus ostralegus (this
bird only tackled on médium sizes as
reported by Atkinson, Clark, Bell,
Daré, Clark and Ireland, 2003; John-
stone and Norris, 2000), or by a high
rate of mortality for these bivalves, as
their vulnerability became more
marked with increasing age and was
also dependent on the quality of waters
and/or an eventual eutrophication in
the estuary, as demonstrated by Ducro-
toy and Ibanez (2002). Indeed, as sea
waters in winter and spring had high
loads of mineral seston in the absence
of pollution, the filter-feeders produced
numerous pseudo-faeces and had a
marked energetic expense for selective
sorting of particles, mucus secretion,
and cleaning of gills for Mytilus edulis
(Widdows, Fieth and Worrall, 1979)
or for Crassostrea gigas (Héral, 1986).
According to Foster-Smith (1975a, b)
and Newell (1977), the behaviour of
adult cockles was different, as they
adapted their pumping activity in the
presence of high concentrations of
mineral seston, with a passage by a rel-
ative State of dormancy (Savari, Lock-
wood and Sheader, 1991). However,
such a behaviour did not seem to exist
during wastewater discharges in
summer, as cockles were in reproduc-
tion and had to live in waters double
loaded with matters in suspensión (pol-
lution) and the phyto-planktonic bloom
(with the increase of temperature),
therefore placing these bivalves under
stress conditions and inducing a high
mortality.
Since November 2002, the discharge
of decanted wastewater in another site
40
Bergayou ET AL. : Reproduction of Cerastoderma edule in Southwestern Morocco
beyond the estuary and the conversión
of this ecosystem into a marine environ-
ment had resulted, for C. edule, in a
wider spatial distribution, a strong
increase of density, and the appearance
of médium sizes in this site. To
comment on these changes, it is neces-
sary to take into account the reproduc-
tion of cockles living in this estuary, as it
is stretched over all the year. Indeed,
according to Gordo (1982), the repro-
ductive cycle of Spanish and Portuguese
populations of C. edule showed a period
of sexual rest during summer months
and the author explained it by the mean
temperature of sea water which were
more than 28°C and would inhibit the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ansell, A. D., Barnett, P. R. O., Bodoy, A. and
Masse, H., 1981. Upper temperature toler-
ances of some European molluscs. III.
Cardium glaucum, C. tuberculatum and C. ed-
ule. Marine Biology, 65: 177-183.
Atkinson, P. W., Clark, N. A., Bell, M. C.,
Daré, P. J., Clark, J. A. and Ireland, P. L.,
2003. Changes in commercially fished shell-
fish stocks and shorebird populations in the
Wash, England. Biological Conservation, 114:
127-141.
Bachelet, G., Bouchet, J. M. and Lissalde, J.
P., 1981. Les peuplements benthiques de la
Gironde: biomasse, productivité et évolu-
tion structurale. Oceanis, 6: 593-620.
Bachelet, G., Guillou, J., Labourg, P. J., 1992a.
Adult, larval and juvenile interactions in the
suspension-feedingbivalve, Cerastoderma ed-
ule: field observations and experiments. In
Colombo, G., Ferrari, I., Ceecherelli, V.U.,
and Rossi, R., (Eds.): Marine eutrophisation
and population dynamics. Fredensborg, 175-
182.
Bachelet, G., Desprez, M., Ducrotoy, J. P.,
Guillou, J., Labourg, P. J., Rybarczyk,
H., Sauriau, P. G., Elkaim, B. and Glé-
marec, M., 1992b. Role de la compétition
intraspécifique dans la régulation du re-
crutement chez la coque, Cerastoderma edule
(L). Anuales de l'Institut Océanographique,
68:75-87.
Battacharya, C. G., 1967. A simple method of
resolution of a distribution into Gaussian
components. Biometrics, 23: 115-135.
Bayed, A., 1982. Ecologie descriptive et dynamique
des plages de la región de Rabat, Maroc. Doctoral
Thesis, Brest, 122 pp.
reproduction of this species, as they
were cióse from the lethal temperature
recorded for C. edule (Ansell, Barnett,
Bodoy and Masse, 1981). As the cockles
from the estuary of the Oued Souss river
practically did not have sexual rest and
showed a gametogenesis starting
towards autumn, the results noted in
this site might be interpreted as an
adaptation of this cockle population to
high temperatures of sea waters which
exist in the South of Morocco. Under
these conditions, it is logical to consider
C. edule an opportunistic species which
might quickly overtake new areas in
presence of favourable environmental
conditions.
Ducrotoy, J. P. and Ibanez, F., 2002. Ecolog-
ical groups of estuarine macrobenthic in-
vertebrates in the Baie de Somme (France):
changes in time and space. Journal ofthe Ma-
rine Biological Association of the United King-
dom, 5: 749-769.
Fernández-Castro, N., Guillou, J., Le Pen-
nec, M. and Cárdenas López, J. J., 1989. Le
cycle sexuel de Cerastoderma edule L. (Bivalve:
Cardiidae) á Brouennou (Finistére). Haliotis,
19: 325-334.
Foster-Smith, R. L., 1975a. The effect of con-
centration of suspensión on the filtration rates
and pseudofaecal production for Mytilus edulis
(L.), Cerastoderma edule (L.) and Venerupis pul-
lastra (Montagu). Journal of Experimental Marine
Biology and Ecology, 17: 1-22.
Foster-Smith, R. L., 1975b. The role of mucus
in the mechanism of feeding in three filter-
feeding bivalves. Proceedings of the Malaco-
logical Society ofLondon, 41: 571-588.
Gabbott, P. A., 1976. Energy metabolism. In
Bayne, P. A. (Ed.): Marine mussels: ecology
and physiology. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 213-355.
Gabe, M., 1968. Techniques histologiques. Masson
et Cié, Paris, 1113 pp.
Gayanilo, F. C. Jr., Sparke, P. and Pauly, P.,
1996. FISAT Software. FAO-ICLARM-Stock-
Assessment-Tools, Makati City, Metro
Manila, The Philippines.
Gimazane, J. P., 1971. Introduction a Vétude ex-
périmentále du cycle sexuel d’un mollusque Bi-
valve Cardium edule L. Analyse des populations,
évolution de la gonade et action de quelquesfac-
teurs: nutrition, température, photopériode. Doc-
toral thesis, University of Caen, 112 pp.
41
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Gordo, L. S., 1982. Aspects of the growth and
density of Cerastoderma edule in the Alvor
Salt Marsh, South Portugal. Arquivos do Museu
Bocage (Series A), 19: 435-452.
Guillou, J., Bachelet, G. and Glémarec, M.,
1992. Influence des fluctuations de tem-
pérature sur la reproduction et le recrute-
ment de la coque Cerastoderma edule (L). An-
uales de l'Institut Océanographique , 68: 65-74
Héral, M., 1986. L'ostréiculture frangaise tra-
ditionnelle. In Barnabe, G., (Ed): Aquacul-
ture, 2nd ed. Lavoisier, París. 345-390.
Hugues, R. N., 1971. Reproduction of Scrobic-
ularia plana Da Costa (Pelecypoda: Semelidae)
in North Wales. The Veliger, 14: 77-81.
Ivell, R., 1981. A quantitative study of a Ceras-
toderma-Nephthys community in the Lim-
fjord, Denmark, with special reference to
production of Cerastoderma edule. Journal of
Molluscan Studies, 47: 147-170.
Johnstone, I. and Norris, K., 2000. The influ-
ence of sediment type on the aggregative re-
sponse of oystercachers, Haematopus ostrale-
gus, searching for cockles, Cerastoderma edule.
Oikos, 89: 146-154.
Kingston, P. F., 1974. Studies on the repro-
ductive cycles of Cardium edule and C. glau-
cum. Marine Biology, 28: 317-323.
Lubet, P., 1991. Reproduction des mollusques
In Barnabé, G., (Ed.): Bases biologiques et
écologiques de l'aquaculture. Lavoisier, Tec and
Doc, París, 167-210.
Lubet, P., 1959. Recherches sur le cycle sexuel et
l'émission des gamétes chez les Mytilidés et les
Pectinidés. Doctoral Thesis, University of
París, 159 pp.
Lucas, A., 1965. Recherches sur la sexualité
des Mollusques Bivalves. Bulletin Biologique
de Trance et de Belgique, 99: 115-247.
Lucas, A. and Beninger, P. G., 1985. The use
of physiological condition indices in marine
bivalve aquaculture. Aquaculture, 44: 187-
200.
Madani, I., 1989. Dynamique des populations et
processus de recrutement chez quatre espéces de
bivalves appartenant aux genres Abra et Ceras-
toderma, dans le bassin d'Ar cachón. Doctoral
Thesis, University of Bordeaux 1, 152 pp.
Mejuto, J., 1984. Primeros datos sobre la di-
námica de la poblation de Cerastoderma edule
L.) de la Ria do Pasaxe ( NW de Galicia), es-
trategias de explotation. Actas IVo Simposio
Ibérico de Estudos do Benthos Marinho, 2: 83-102.
Newell, R. I. E., 1977. The ecophysiology of
Cardium edule (Linné). Ph. D. Thesis. Uni-
versity of London, 250 pp.
Rodríguez-Rua, A., Prado, M. A., Romeo, Z.
andBruzon, M., 2003. The gametogenic cy-
cle of Scrobicularia plana (Da Costa, 1778)
(Mollusca: Bivalvia) in Guadalquivir estu-
ary (Cádiz, SW Spain). Aquaculture, 217: 157-
166.
Sauriau, P. G., 1992. Les mollusques benthiques
du bassin de Marennes-Oléron: estimation et
cartographie des stocks non cultives, compétition
spatiale et trophique, dynamique de population de
Cerastoderma edule (L.). Doctoral Thesis,
University of Nantes, 262 pp.
Savari, A., Lockwood, A. P. M. and Sheader,
M., 1991. Variations in the physiological State
of the common cockle ( Cerastoderma edule
(L.)) in the laboratory and in Southampton
Water. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 57: 33-44.
Seed, R., 1975. Reproduction in Mytilus edulis
L. (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in European waters.
Pubblicazioni delta Stazione Zoológica di Napoli,
39: 317-334.
Seed, R. and Suchanek, T. H., 1992. Popula-
tion and community ecology of Mytilus.
Chapter 4. In Gosling, E., (Ed.): The mussel
Mytilus: ecology, physiology, genetics and cul-
ture. Developments in Aquaculture and Fish-
eries Science, n° 25. Elsevier, Amster-
dam/New York, 87-168.
Sola, J. C., 1997. Reproduction, population dy-
namics growth, and production of Scrobicu-
laria plana Da Costa (Pelecypoda) in the Bida-
soa estuary, Spain. Netherlands Journal of
Aquatic Ecology, 30: 283-296.
Widdows, J., Donkin, P., 1992. Mussels and
environmental contaminants: bioaccumula-
tion and physiological aspects. In Gosling, E.,
(Ed.): The mussel Mytilus: ecology, physiology,
genetics and culture. Developments in Aqua-
culture and Fisheries Science, n° 25. Elsevier,
Amsterdam/New York, 383-424.
Widdows, J., Fieth, P. and Worrall, C. M.,
1979. Relationship between seston, available
food and feeding activity in the common
mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 50: 195-
207.
42
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus , 26 (1): 43-46, 2008
Xylodiscula wareni n. sp., una nuova specie per le coste
orientali della Sicilia
Xylodiscula wareni n. sp., una nueva specie para las costas orientales
de Sicilia
Cesare BOGI* e Stefano BARTOLINI**
Recibido el 27-X-2007. Aceptado el 15-XII-2007
RIASSUNTO
Si descrive un piccolo gasteropode planispirale, che non corrisponde a nessuna delle spe-
cie attualmente viventi nel Mar Mediterráneo, trovato in campioni di sedimento raccolti a
profonditá cómprese tra i 35 e i 52 m lungo le coste siciliane. La forma generóle della
conchiglia ci ha indotto ad ascrivere questa specie, solo prowisoriamente, al genere Xylo-
discula Marshall, 1988 anche se alcune caratteristiche della protoconca, non iperstrofica,
lo escluderebbero.
Questa specie si descrive come nuova, con il nome di Xylodiscula wareni anche se proba-
bilmente non appartiene a questo genere, evitando di descrivere al momento un nuovo
genere scarsamente definito.
ABSTRACT
A small planispiral gastropod, which could not be ascribed to any known species from the
Mediterranean or adjacent seas, was found in sediment samples collected in depths
between 35 and 52 m in the seas around Sicily.
The general shape resmbles the genus Xylodiscula Marshall, 1 988, but the protoconch ¡s
not heterostrophic and has a distinct sculpture not described from any gastropod. There-
fore we describe this new species as Xylodiscula wareni, although it probably does not
belong to the genus, instead of creating a new, poorly defined genus.
RESUMEN
Se describe un pequeño gasterópodo planiespiral recolectado entre 35 y 52 m de profun-
didad en las costas Sicilianas, que no pudo ser asignado a ninguna especie conocida del
Mediterráneo ni de mares adyacentes. La forma general se asemeja al género Xylodiscula
Marshall, 1 988, aunque la protoconcha no sea heterostrófica y tenga una escultura dis-
tinta que no se conoce en ningún otro gasterópodo. Se propone como nueva especie
Xylodiscula wareni. Aunque probablemente no pertenezca a este género, se descarta de
momento la descripción de un género nuevo escasamente definido.
PAROLE CHIAVE: Gastropoda, Xylodisculidae, Xylodiscula wareni, nuova specie, Mar Mediterráneo, recente.
KEY WORDS: Gastropoda, Xylodisculidae, Xylodiscula wareni , new species, Mediterranean Sea, recent.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Gastropoda, Xylodisculidae, Xylodiscula wareni , nueva especie, mar Mediterráneo, reciente.
* Via delle Viole 7 1-57124, Livorno. e-mail bogicesare@tiscali.it
** Via E. Zacconi,l6 1-50137, Firenze. e-mail stefmaria.bartolini@libero.it
43
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
INTRODUZIONE
Le nostre continué ricerche malaco-
logiche e Pesame di numerosi campioni
di sedimento raccolti lungo le coste
della Sicilia Nord-Orientale e le isole
antistanti, ci ha portato, questa volta, a
studiare alcuni micromolluschi, in tutto
quattro esemplari, isolati da piccole
quantitá di detrito raccolto a profonditá
variabili tra i 35 mt. e i 52 mt.
II piccolo gasteropode di forma pla-
norbide viene, per l'aspetto generale
della conchiglia, solo provvisoriamente
attribuito al genere Xylodiscula Marshall,
1988, in quanto le caratteristiche della
sua protoconca, non iperstrofica, lo
escluderebbero .
SISTEMATICA
Ordine Heterostropha Fischer P. , 1885
Famiglia Xylodisculidae Waren A., 1992
Genere Xylodiscula Marshall,1988
Xylodiscula wareni n. sp. (Fig. 1)
Materiale esaminato: 1 esemplare (olotipo, fig.l a-e) proveniente da detriti raccolti nel Luglio 2005
alia base della "Secca dei 6 metri" presso l'isola di Filicudi a -50 m. , 1 esemplare (paratipo A) rac-
colto nel Giugno 2006 a Cannizzaro, loe. Bellatrix, -35 m.di profonditá lungo una párete rocciosa,
2 esemplari (paratipi B e C) provenienti da campioni di detriti coralligeni raccolti a Scilla a -52 m.
Materiale tipo: L'olotipo (Diam.= 1.1 mm), (Fig. 1A-E ) é stato depositato nella collezione malaco-
logia del Museo di Storia Naturale del Mediterráneo di Livorno, Italia, con il numero: Malacologia
Vol. V, n. 734. 1 paratipi sono conservad nelle seguenti collezioni: il paratipo A (Diam.= 1.0 mm),
nella collezione di S. Bartolini (Firenze), il paratipo B (Diam.= 1,3 mm) , e il paratipo C (Diam.= 1,2
mm), nella collezione E. Perna (Napoli).
Locus typicus: Detriti raccolti alia base della "Secca dei 6 metri" presso Pisóla di Filicudi a -50 m.
di profonditá.
Etimología: La specie é stata dedicata al Dottor Anders Warén, malacologo di fama mondiale e
specialista, tra l'altro, nei piccoli "Skeneimorpha".
Diagnosi (olotipo): Conchiglia piccola,
fragüe, trasparente, di forma planor-
bide.La protoconca (fig.l e) é costituita
da 0.7 giri di spira di cui la parte iniziale
é scolpita da piccole e irregolari depres-
sioni.La teleoconca é costituita da circa 2
giri di spira attraversati da deboli linee
di accrescimento. I giri si toccano solo
per un breve tratto piú o meno alia peri-
feria del giro precedente e quindi la
sutura risulta profonda e leggermente
canaliculata. Spira arrotondata con la
protoconca di poco sporgente nella
parte superiore della stessa. Alia base
della conchiglia é ben visibile per tutta
la lunghezza della teleoconca, una evi-
dente carena posizionata internamente
all'ombelico. La bocea é di forma roton-
deggiante con la parte inferiore legger-
mente espansa in prossimitá della
carena. La larghezza dell'ombelico é
circa il 30% del diámetro delPintera con-
chiglia.
Dimensioni : Diámetro^ 1.1 mm.
Opercolo e partí molli ancora scono-
sciute.
Distribuzzione: La specie sembra
avere una distribuzione ristretta a poche
localitá delle coste siciliane, ed il suo
habitat non sembra essere mai superfi-
ciale.
Discussione : L'attribuzione di questi
esemplari al genere Xylodiscula é da rite-
nersi provvisoria in quanto solo lo
studio delle partí molli potranno dame
un'inquadramento tassonomico piú
congeniale. La forma generale della con-
chiglia in realtá corrisponde alie caratte-
ristiche tipiche di questo genere, ma la
protoconca differisce in quanto non ha
uno sviluppo iperstrofico típico della
famiglia Xylodisculidae Warén, 1992.
44
Bogi E BartolinI: Xylodiscula wareni n.sp., una nuova specie per le coste della Sicilia
Figura 1. Xylodiscula wareni n. sp., Filicudi -50 m, olotipo (Museo di Storia Naturale del Mediter-
ráneo di Livorno, Coll. Malac. N° Malacologia Vol. V n. 734). A: vista dall’alto; B: vista basale; C:
vista frontale; D: dettaglio dell’ombelico; E: dettaglio della protoconca.
Figura 1. Xylodiscula wareni n.sp., Filicudi -50 m, holotype (Museo di Storia Naturale del Mediterrá-
neo di Livorno, Coll. Malac. N° Malacologia Vol. V n. 734). A: apical view; B: basal view; C: frontal
view; D: detail ofthe umbilicus; E: detall ofthe protoconch.
II genere Xylodiscula é attualmente
rappresentato nel Mar Mediterráneo da
due specie: X. boucheti Warén, Carrozza
e Rocchini, 1992, e X. leus Warén, 1992.
Warén stesso nel suo articolo (Warén,
1992) evidenzia la difficoltá nel distin-
guere le due specie che differiscono
quasi esclusivamente per il diámetro
45
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
dell'ombelico che é il 30-33 % del diáme-
tro deH'intera conchiglia in X. boucheti
mentre in X. lens é il 40%. La caratteri-
stica principale che distingue X. wareni
da queste due specie, come dalle altre
non mediterranee appartenenti a questo
genere, oltre alia diversa protoconca, é
la presenza di una carena ben visibile
alia base della conchiglia (Fig. IB).
Abbiamo dubitato che gli esemplari
potessero appartenere ad una specie
dulciacquicola o terrestre, ma le nostre
ricerche e l'opinioni di alcuni specialisti
hanno escluso questa possibilitá.
RINGRAZIAMENTI
Un particolare ringraziamento al
Dottor Ánders Warén del Museo Svedese
di Storia Naturale di Stoccolma, per aver
eseguito le foto al SEM e per i consigli dati
nella rilettura critica dell' articolo, e all'a-
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Marshall, B.A., 1988. Skeneidae, Vitrinelli-
dae and Orbitestellidae (Mollusca: Gastro-
poda) associated with biogenic substraía
from bathyal depths off New Zealand and
New South Wales. Journal of Natural History,
22: 949-1004.
La specie tipo del genere, Xylodi-
scula vitrea Marshall, 1988, come puré X.
eximia Marshall, 1988, originarle rispetti-
vamente dell'Australia e della Nuova
Zelanda, sono state tróvate su pezzi di
legno affondati ed anche le specie
descritte da Warén per il Mar Mediterrá-
neo sono state raccolte viventi in un
biotopo caratterizzato da fibre di Posido-
nia e frammenti di legno affondati.
Nei campioni di sedimento dove noi
abbiamo trovato i pochi esemplari di X.
wareni, non erano presenti frammenti di
Posidonia.
mico Edoardo Perna per aver messo a
disposizione i suoi esemplari nonché le
foto degli stessi. All'amico Ivano Niero
per aver studiato gli esemplari come even-
tuali appartenenti alia fauna continentale.
Warén A., 1992. New and little known "Ske-
neimorph" gastropods from the Mediterra-
nean Sea and the adiacent Atlantic Ocean. Bol-
lettino Malacologico, 27 (10-12):149-248.
46
© Sociedad Española de Malaca logia
Iberus , 26 (1): 47-51, 2008
The colour white diminishes weight loss during aestivation
in the arid-dwelling land snail Sphincterochila (Albea) can -
didissima
El color blanco disminuye la pérdida de peso durante la estivación en
el caracol de medios áridos Sphincterochila (Albea) candidissima
Gregorio MORENO-RUEDA*
Recibido el 14-V-2007. Aceptado el 2-1-2008
ABSTRACT
It has been suggested that white colour is beneficial for snails living ¡n arid environments.
In this work, shell coloration in the arid-dwelling land snail Sphincterochila (Albea) can-
didissima was manipulated during aestivation. Snails painted black lost more body weight
than did control ones, presumably as a consequence of higher heat absorption. This sug-
gests that light colour is advantageous for this land snail.
RESUMEN
Se ha sugerido que el color blanco es beneficioso para los caracoles en ambientes ári-
dos. En el presente trabajo se manipula la coloración de la concha en el caracol de
medios áridos Sphincterochila (Albea) candidissima durante la estivación. Los caracoles
pintados de negro perdieron más peso que los caracoles que sirvieron como control, pre-
sumiblemente como una consecuencia de una mayor absorción de calor. Esto sugiere que
los colores claros son ventajosos para este caracol.
KEY WORDS: Sphincterochila candidissima , arid environments, colouration.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Sphincterochila candidissima , medios áridos, coloración.
INTRODUCTION
It is well established that tegument
colour has important functions in camou-
flage, as well as in communication (e.g.,
Badayev and Hill, 2000; Théry, Debut,
Gómez and Casas, 2005; Exnerova,
SVADORA, BARCALOVA, LANDOVA,
Prokopova, Fuchs and Socha, 2006).
The colour of teguments depends on the
wavelengths that are reflected. Therefore,
colouration affects the energy that is
absorbed by the tegument, the amount
being higher as the colour darkens. In
this sense, animal colouration may also
have a role in thermoregulation, espe-
cially important for arid-dwelling
animáis (Cloudsley-Thompson, 1978).
Terrestrial molluscs are very susceptible
to dehydration (Prior, 1985; Luchtel
and Deyrup-Olsen, 2001), and therefore
need adaptations to survive in arid envi-
* Konrad Lorenz Institut für Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung, Ósterreischische Academie der
Wissenschaften, SavoyenstraEe la, A- 1160, Wien (Austria) and Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de
Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E- 18071, Granada (Spain).
47
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
ronments. White colour may favour the
success of land-snails in warm environ-
ments: White shells have a higher
reflectance of sunlight (Schmidt-
Nielsen, Taylor and Shkolnik, 1971),
and, as a consequence, land snails with
light-coloured shells register lower body
temperatures (Heath, 1975), thereby
improving survival under high tempera-
tures (Richardson, 1974). This translates
as a selective pressure for whiter shells in
arid environments and, in fact, some
studies have correlated shell colour with
environment temperature (Jones, 1973;
but there are exceptions: Heller, 1984).
The snails of the genus Sphincterochila
have white shells. In Sierra Elvira (SE
Spain), Sphincterochila (Albea) candidísi-
ma (Draparnaud, 1801) is the most abun-
dant gastropod (Moreno-Rueda, 2002).
Sierra Elvira has an arid environment,
and sheltering in protective microhabi-
tats may be a vital strategy against dehy-
dration (Steinberger, Grossman, Du-
binsky and Shachak, 1983; Arad,
Goldenberg and Heller, 1989; Cook,
2001). However, S. candidísima does not
use refuges during drought periods
(spring and summer) (Moreno-Rueda,
2007; Moreno-Rueda and Collantes-
Martín, 2007). Because the shell of S.
candidísima is puré white, I hypothe-
sized that shell colour might contribute
to the survival of S. candidísima in Sierra
Elvira, explaining why this snail does
not need refuges against dehydration. I
investigated this hypothesis by manipu-
lating the shell colour of S. candidísima
during aestivation (painting some
snails), and by examining the effect of
this manipulation on the amount of
body mass lost. About 80-90% of fresh
body weight (shell not included) of
Sphincterochila land snails is water, and,
therefore, a decrease in body weight sug-
gests a loss of water (Schmidt-Nielsen
et al., 1971; Yom-Tov, 1971; Steinberg-
er, Grossman and Dubinsky, 1981).
METHODS
This study was performed in Sierra
Elvira (SE Spain, 37° 15' N, 3o 40' W), a
small mountain range with a dry
mesomediterranean climate (UNESCO,
1963). The study area undergoes five
months of drought each year, with an
averáge annual precipitation of 600-1000
mm (Alonso, López- Alcántara, Rivas
and IbáÑez, 1985). It is, therefore, a dry
zone for land snails. Table I presents cli-
matic data during the study period,
measured from the meteorological
station of Pinos Puente, about three kilo-
metres from the study area, and approx-
imately at the same altitude (630 m.
a.s.l.).
Sphincterochila candidísima is the
only species of the genus Sphincterochila
in Sierra Elvira (Ruiz Ruiz, Cárcaba
Pozo, Porras Crevillén and
Arrébola Burgos, 2006). In the study
area, this species begins aestivation in
April-May (Moreno-Rueda, 2007;
Moreno-Rueda and Collantes-
Martín, 2007). This snail adheres to
rock or vegetation during aestivation.
For manipulation, snails were not sepa-
rated from the substrate, because this
could provoke dehydration in the snails
(Luchtel and Deyrup-Olsen, 2001).
For this reason, I could not measure
body mass before treatment, but I col-
lected 75 additional individuáis in
order to analyse the relationship
between shell morphology and body
mass. The experiment started on 26
June 2005. Each individual found was
sequentially assigned to the control
group (C), to the control of manipula-
tion group (CM), or to the experimental
group (E). Manipulation in control
group was only a mark for recognition.
Snails in the CM group were painted in
yellow with a marker. Paint covered
approximately 50% of shell surface. In
the experimental group, the shell was
painted black with a marker in the
same way as in CM group. In total, 52
snails were used in each group (n =
156). The study area was prospected
two months later (26 August 2005).
Snails found were collected and mea-
sured (shell height and width) with a
calliper (accuracy 0.01 mm.) and
weighed with a digital balance (accu-
racy 0.1 g.).
48
MORENO Rueda: Colour white and aestivation weight loss in Sphincterochila candidissima
Table I. Climatic data of the meteorological station of Pinos Puente, located near of the study area,
for the study period (06/26/2005 to 08/26/2005).
Tabla I. Datos climáticos de la estación meteorológica de Pinos Puente, próxima a la zona de estudio,
para el período de estudio (2610612005 a 26/08/2005).
average weight after statistically controlling for shell height and width. The last column shows the
results of ANOVA and ANCOVA. In brackets is the standard error.
Tabla II. Peso promedio el día 26/08/2005, y altura y anchura de la concha para los caracoles en el
grupo experimental (E), control (C) y control de la manipulación ( CM). La última fila muestra el peso
promedio después de controlar estadísticamente por la altura y anchura de la concha. La última
columna muestra los resultados de los tests de ANOVA y ANCOVA. Entre paréntesis el error estándar.
The variables had a distribution
similar to normal (Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test, p > 0.05), and parametric statistics
were used. An ANOVA was used to test
the effect of the treatment on body
weight, and an ANCOVA was used con-
trolling by snail body size (height and
width). For post hoc comparisons the
Fisher LSD test was used. The Chi-
square was used to test the probability
of survival according to treatment.
RESULTS
In August, I recaptured 34 snails
alive in the control group, 30 for the CM
group, and 29 of the experimental
group. The frequency of recaptures did
not differ significantly between the three
groups (x22= 1.12; p= 0.57). When indi-
viduáis were collected in August, there
were significant differences for body
mass between the treatments (Table II).
Individuáis of the experimental group
weighed less than those in the control
one (post hoc Fisher LSD, p = 0.01),
while the average weight in the CM
group was intermediate between the
other two groups (post hoc, CM vs. C, p
= 0.22; CM vs. E, p = 0.22). In the addi-
tional sample of 75 individuáis, body
mass was strongly predicted by shell
morphology (Múltiple Regression
Model; R2 = 0.81; F 2,72 = 149.0; p < 0.001;
equation: Body mass = -5.16 (SE = 0.46;
t72 = 11.2) + 0.28 (SE = 0.03; t72 = 10.2) x
Width + 0.14 (SE = 0.03; t72 = 5.1) x
Height). There were no significant dif-
ferences for body size (height and
49
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
width) between the three groups
(MANOVA, Wilks = 0.94; F4, ízs = 1.46; p
= 0.22; Table II), suggesting that initial
body mass did not differ among groups.
When the analyses were repeated with
shell height and width as a covariate,
differences in weight between groups
were accentuated (ANCOVA, Vi, 88 =
6.28; p < 0.003; Height effect: Fi, 88 =
10.90; p = 0.001; Width: Fi,88 = 21.98; p <
0.001; Table II). Differences between the
control group and the experimental
group increased in this analysis (post
hoc, p < 0.001), while body weight in the
CM group remained intermediate
between the other two groups (CM vs.
C, p = 0.08; CM vs. E, p = 0.08).
DISCUSSION
The findings of this experimental
study show that shell colour alteration
in Sphincterochila candidissima during
aestivation had effects on weight loss,
snails with shells painted black suffer-
ing a quicker loss of weight than control
snails. The most probable mechanism
behind this result is that light reflection
was lower in shells painted in black,
and for this reason they trapped more
heat, as shown in other studies with
other species of snails (e.g., Heath,
1975). The higher the body temperature,
the higher the water loss, decreasing
body weight (Yom-Tov, 1971). Body
size may affect the interaction between
shell colour and heat absorption
(Slotow, Goodfriend and Ward,
1993), but there were no differences in
body size between the groups, and dif-
ferences in weight remained significant
after controlling statistically for shell
morphology. This weight loss presum-
ably harms fitness, increasing the risk of
mortality, especially for the smallest
individuáis (with less reserves), or in
very dry years (Richardson, 1974).
Moreover, the treatment lasted only two
months (although the warmest), but S.
candidissima aestivates for 5-7 months in
the study area (Moreno-Rueda and
Collantes-Martín, 2007), and there-
fore, the effect should be more accentu-
ated if the entire aestivation period is
considered.
The control of manipulation (CM)
group, with shells painted in yellow,
had weight valúes intermediate to the
other two groups. In fact, this group is
not a true control of manipulation, as
colour was altered with respect to
unmanipulated snails. Because their
shells were darker than shells in the
control group, but lighter than shells in
the experimental group, the results
support that weight loss is due to shell
colour. As weight for the CM group was
intermediate, if there was an effect of
paint on weight, this cannot completely
explain the differences between the
control and the experimental group.
Therefore, results presented here
and in the literature strongly suggest
that the white colour is advantageous
for survival in arid-dwelling snails. The
question arises as to why white colour is
not more widespread in arid environ-
ments (see, for example, Heller, 1984).
Other selective mechanisms besides
thermal selection act on shell colour,
such as predation (Jones, Leith and
Rawlings, 1977). Lighter shells, espe-
cially those with a puré white colour as
in Sphincterochila candidissima , are
usually easier to detect by predators
(Reed and Janzen, 1999). However,
predation on Sphincterochila candidissima
is rare due to its thick shell (Yanes,
Suárez and Manrique, 1991), and thus
the absence of a strong selection by
predators in this species would favour
the maintenance of puré white shells.
In conclusión, this study, applying
an experimental approach, supports the
hypothesis that shell colour affects
weight loss in arid-dwelling land-snails,
and, as a consequence, fitness, by a
mechanism mediated by thermoregula-
tion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Carlos Marfil Daza and José Luís
Ros Santaella collaborated in the field
work. David Nesbitt improved the
English.
50
MORENO Rueda: Colour white and aestivation weight loss in Sphincterochila candidissima
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alonso, M. R., López- Alcántara, A., Rivas,
P. and IbáÑEZ, M., 1985. A biogeographic
study of Iberus gualtierianus (L.) (Pulmonata:
Helicidae). Soosiana, 13: 1-10.
Arad, Z., Goldenberg, S. and Heller, ]., 1989.
Resistance to desiccation and distribution
pattems in the land snail Sphincterochila. Jour-
nal ofZoology, 218: 353-364.
Badyaev, A. V. and Hill, G. E., 2000. Evolu-
tion of sexual dichromatism: contribution of
carotenoid- versus melanin-based coloration.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69:
153-172.
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., 1978. Adaptive
function of the colour s of desert animáis.
Comparative Physiological Ecology, 1: 109-120.
Cook, A., 2001. Behavioural ecology: On doing
the right thing, in the right place at the right
time. In Barker, G. M. (Ed.): The Biology ofTer-
restrial Molluscs. CAB International. Walling-
ford. Pp. 447-487.
Exnerova, A., Svadora, K., Barcalova, S.,
Landova, E., Prokopova, M., Fuchs, R. and
Socha, R., 2006. Importance of colour in the
reaction of passerine predators to aposematic
prey: experiments with mutants of Pyrrhocoris
apterus (Heteroptera). Biological Journal ofthe
Linnean Society, 88: 143-153.
Heath, D. J., 1975. Colour, sunlight and inter-
nal temperatures in the land-snail Cepaea
nemoralis (L.). Oecologia, 19: 29-38.
Heller, J., 1984. Shell colours of desert land-
snails. Malacologia, 25: 355-359.
Jones, J. S., 1973. Ecological genetics and
natural selection in molluscs. Science, 182:
546-552.
Jones, J. S., Leith, B. H. and Rawlings, P.,
1977. Polymorphism in Cepaea: a problem
with too many Solutions? Annual Review in
Ecology and Systematics, 8: 109-143.
Luchtel, D. L., Deyrup-Olsen, I., 2001. Body
wall: form and function. In Barker, G. M.
(Ed.): The Biology ofTerrestrial Molluscs. CAB
International. Wallingford. Pp. 147-178.
Moreno-Rueda, G., 2002. Selección de hábitat
por Iberus gualtierianus, Rumina decollata y
Sphincterochila candidissima (Gastropoda: Pul-
monata) en una sierra del sureste español.
Iberus, 20: 55-62.
Moreno-Rueda, G., 2007. Refuge selection by
two sympatric species of arid-dwelling land
snails: Different adaptive strategies to achieve
the same objective. Journal of Arid Enviro-
ments, 68: 588-598.
Moreno-Rueda, G. and Collantes-Martín,
E., 2007. Ciclo anual de actividad del caracol
Sphincterochila (Albea) candidissima (Dra-
pamaud, 1801) en un medio semiárido. Iberus,
25: 49-56.
Prior, D. ]., 1985. Water-regulatory behaviour
in terrestrial gastropods. Biological Reviews,
60: 403-424.
Reed, W. L. and Janzen, F. J., 1999. Natural
selection by avian predators on size and
colour of a freshwater snail ( Pomacea flage-
llata ). Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society, 67: 331-342.
Richardson, A. M. M., 1974. Differential cli-
ma tic selection in natural population of land
snail Cepaea nemoralis. Nature, 247: 572-573.
Ruiz Ruiz, A., Cárcaba Pozo, A., Porras Cre-
villen, A. I. and Arrebola, J. R., 2006. Guía
de los caracoles terrestres de Andalucía. Fun-
dación Gypaetus, Seville.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Taylor, C. R. and
Shkolnik, A., 1971. Desert snails: problems
of heat, water and food. Journal of Experi-
mental Biology, 55: 385-398.
Slotow, R., Goodfriend, W. and Ward, D.,
1993. Shell colour polymorphism of the
Negev desert landsnail, Trochoidea seetzeni: the
importance of temperature and predation.
Journal of Arid Environments, 24: 47-61.
Steinberger, Y., Grossman, S. and Dubinsky,
Z., 1981. Some aspects of the ecology of the
desert snail Sphincterochila prophetarum in re-
lation to energy and water flow. Oecologia, 50:
103-108.
Steinberger, Y., Grossman, S., Dubinsky, Z.
and Shachak, M., 1983. Stone microhabitats
and the movement and activity of desert
snails, Sphincterochila prophetarum. Malaco-
logical Review, 16: 63-70.
Théry, M., Debut, M., Gómez, D. and Casas,
J., 2005. Specific color sensitivities of prey
and predator explain camouflage in differ-
ent visual Systems. Behavioral Ecology, 16 : 25-
29.
UNESCO, 1963. Recherches sur la zone aride.
Etude écologique de la zone méditerraéenne. Cañe
bioclimatique de la zone méditerranéenne. Notice
explicative. UNESCO. Paris.
Yanes, M., Suárez, F. and Manrique, J., 1991.
La cogujada montesina, Galerida theklae, como
depredador del caracol Otala lactea: com-
portamiento alimenticio y selección de presa.
Ardeola, 38: 297-303.
Yom-Tov, Y., 1971. Annual fluctuations in the
water contení of desert snails. Malacological
Review, 4: 121-126.
51
1
Iberus, 26 (1): 53-63, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacologta
Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854 (Gastropoda:
Colloniidae)
Notas sobre el género Anadema H. y A. Adams, 1854 (Gastropoda:
Colloniidae)
James H. MCLEAN* and Serge GOFAS**
Recibido el 15-1-2008. Aceptado el 23-IV-2008
ABSTRACT
Shell morphology and characters of the living animal of the poorly known, Atlantic Moroc-
can species Anadema mocandrewii (Mórch, 1 864) are described and illustrated, based
on beach collected specimens and a single live-collected specimen. The genus ¡s mono-
typic and is assigned to the Colloniidae rather than Turbinidae because of the dome-
shaped profile of the shell, open umbilicus, symmetrical tooth rows of the radula, lack of
cephalic lappets, and the non-bicarinate ¡uvenile shell. Within the Colloniidae, it unusual
for its relatively large mature shell, ¡uvenile shell with a keeled profile, and the lack of the
secondary flap above the rachidian tooth. The species is regarded as sexually dimorphic,
with the female shell having a raised periumbilical rim comparable to that of other tro-
choideans modified for brooding by means of an enlarged umbilical cavity.
RESUMEN
Se describe e ilustra la morfología de la concha y del animal vivo de Anadema macan-
drewii (Mórch, 1864), una especie poco conocida de la costa atlántica de Marruecos. El
género es monotípico y se asigna a la familia Colloniidae, en lugar de a los Turbinidae
por la forma abombada de la concha, el ombligo abierto, las filas de dientes radulares
simétricas, la ausencia de lóbulos cefálicos y por su concha juvenil no bicarenada. Entre
los Colloniidae, la especie es insólita por el tamaño relativamente grande de la concha
adulta, el perfil de la concha juvenil con una quilla y la ausencia de un repliegue secun-
dario sobre el diente raquídeo. Se considera que existe dimorfismo sexual en esta
especie, pues la concha de la hembra tiene un reborde periumbilical elevado comparable
con el de otros trocoideos modificados para incubar en una cavidad umbilical ampliada.
KEY WORDS: Trochoidea, Morocco, brooding, endemism.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Trochoidea, Marruecos, incubación, endemismo.
INTRODUCTION
The poorly known genus Anadema been regarded as a trochid, a liotiid, a
H. and A. Adams, 1854 has at times colloniid, and a turbinid. Here we
* Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, California 90007, USA.
** Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, E-29071 Málaga, Spain.
53
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
review the taxonomy and update what
is now known about the type and only
known species of this genus.
Anadema was proposed for the com-
bination Omphalius (Anadema) caelata A.
Adams, 1854, an Atlantic Moroccan
species then thought to be a trochid in
the absence of data on a calcified oper-
culum. The species was not to be illus-
trated until 19 years later but it was
described in sufficient detail that its
identity has never been in question. In
his remarks that followed the Latin
description of the species, Adams (1855:
39) wrote: "The character of this shell is
so peculiar, on account of the internal
spiral callus of the umbilicus, and the
absence of characters which constitute
allied forms, that I propose to consider it
a subgenus of Omphalius , under the
ñame of Anadema." The generic ñame
Omphalius Philippi, 1847 now pertains
to the Tegulinae, as defined by
Hickman and McLean (1990).
Ten years after the introduction of
Anadema , Mórch (1864: 46) reported
that a living specimen had been col-
lected at the type locality. Morch stated
that: "Omphalius (Anadema) caelata is
provided with a calcareous operculum,
which proves that this species may be
removed to Turbo. As there is already a
T. caelata, L., I propose for this species
Turbo macandrewii." Morch's placement
of the species in Turbo predated most
work on the genera of turbiniform gas-
tropods, and was based on the assump-
tion that any turbiniform species with a
calcareous operculum could only be a
Turbo. This was unfair to Arthur Adams,
but the ICZN rules about secondary
homonymy forcé us to abandon the
original ñame and to use the replace-
ment ñame. This ñame honors the re-
discoverer Robert McAndrew, who
dredged a living specimen at Mogador
(now Essaouira), the type locality of the
species.
The first shell figure known to us
was provided still later by P. Fischer
(1873), who used the replacement ñame
Turbo macandrewii; this is a drawing that
has been copied by many subsequent
authors. The operculum has never been
figured and the repository of the oper-
culate specimen examined by Morch is
unknown.
Pilsbry (1888) ignored the replace-
ment ñame and called it Leptothyra
caelata, a not unreasonable choice, as it
hardly resembles a species of Turbo. Lep-
tothyra is now assigned to Colloniidae.
Wenz (1938: 340) recognized the
genus Anadema and placed it in the
turbinid subfamily Liotiinae, under a
broad definition in which he also
included genera with calcareous oper-
cula related to Homalopoma.
Keen (1960: 270) placed Anadema in
the more restricted Homalopomatinae, a
group with fully calcified operculum,
now subsumed under the turbinid sub-
family Colloniinae in the classification
of Hickman and McLean (1990).
Nordseick (1968: 33) overlooked
Mórch (1864) and placed it in Liotiinae:
"Deckel spiralig und mit Kalkbesatz,
nicht verdickt", apparently having
assumed that it must have the opercular
definition of the now understood Lioti-
idae, in which the operculum is multi-
spiral with calcareous beads on the
outer surface.
Resolution of the uncertainty is here
provided by a preserved immature
specimen with operculum, which was
collected by the second author in 1991 at
Essaouira (formerly Mogador), the type
locality. We therefore take this opportu-
nity to illustrate the species and confirm
its placement.
MATERIALS
This report is based on material col-
lected by the second author, which is
now in the malacology collection of the
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle,
Paris (MNHN). The external features of
the single live-collected specimen were
drawn with the animal fully extended.
Subsequent preservation of the speci-
men resulted in retraction within the
shell. It was later critical-point dried for
SEM examination, after which it was
rehydrated for extraction of the radula
for SEM analysis.
54
McLean AND GOFAS: Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
SYSTEM ATICS
Superfamily Trochoidea Rafinesque, 1815
Hickman and McLean (1990)
divided the family Turbinidae into a
number of subfamilies, including Lioti-
inae, Colloniinae, and Turbininae.
However, Williams and Ozawa (2007)
have reported that their data toward a
molecular phylogeny of the family
Turbinidae indicates that there are two
well-supported groups within the previ-
ously defined Turbinidae, which there-
fore preeludes the placement of all of
the subfamilies in the same family. In
view of the ongoing reconsideration of
the relationships among these groups.
we here treat the Liotiidae, Colloniidae,
and Turbinidae at the family level
within the superfamily Trochoidea,
which simply raises the ranking in the
existing classification. This has already
been adopted by McLean and Kiel
(2007). Additionally, and without dis-
cussion, Warén and Bouchet in Bouchet
and Rocroi (2005: 245) have separated
Turbinoidea and Trochoidea at the
superfamily level, which also indicates
that the higher classification for trochi-
form vetigastropods is currently unset-
tled.
Family Colloniidae Cossmann, 1916
Subfamily Colloniinae Cossmann, 1916
Hickman and McLean (1990) pro-
vided an extensive treatment of the Col-
loniidae (then as Colloniinae), distin-
guishing them from Turbinidae (then as
Turbininae) on their smaller size, non-bi-
carinate juvenile shell, lack of cephalic
lappets, symmetrical tooth rows and inner
lateral teeth that are not greatly enlarged.
This is in contrast with the Turbinidae,
characterized by larger size, bicarinate ju-
venile shell, asymmetrical tooth rows and
enlarged inner lateral teeth of the radula.
McLean and Kiel (2007) distin-
guished two subfamilies within the Col-
loniidae, based on opercular morphol-
ogy: the basal and mostly extinct
Petropomatinae Cox in Knight et al.,
1960, having a calcified operculum that
is conical on the inner surface, with a
fully multispiral pattern, and the Col-
loniinae, in which the operculum is fíat
on the inner surface with a multispiral
pattern that changes to broadly pau-
cispiral on the final volution. There is
one living genus ( Liotipoma McLean and
Kiel, 2007) of Petropomatinae, whereas
there are numerous living and fossil
genera of Colloniinae.
Genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854: 430 [as subgenus of Omphalius Philippi, 1847]. Type species
(monotypy): Omphalius ( Anadema ) caelata A. Adams in H. and A. Adams, 1854 [= Turbo macan-
drewii Morch, 1864; not Turbo caelata Linnaeus, 1758].
Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864) (Figs. 1-23)
Omphalius (Anadema) caelata A. Adams, in H and A. Adams, 1854: 430 [as type of new subgenus].
A. Adams, 1855: 39 [more detailed description].
Turbo macandrewii Morch, 1864: 46 [new ñame for secondary homonym Omphalius (Anadema)
caelata, not Turbo caelata Linnaeus, 1758].
Turbo macandrewi. Fischer, 1873: 98, pl. 29, fig. 3 [first illustration]. Pasteur-Humbert, 1962: 132
[listed].
Leptothyra coelata [sic]. Pilsbry, 1888: 255, pl. 48, fig. 38 [figure after Fischer],
55
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Turbo (Anadema) macandrewi. Pallary, 1920: 63.
Anadema coelata [sic]. Wenz, 1938: 340, fig. 795 [figure after Fischer]. Nordesick, 1968: 33, fig.
17.00
Anadema caelata. Keen, 1960: 270 [no figure]. Trew, 1992: 19 [listing of species described by H.&
A. Adams].
Material examined: BMNH, 2 syntypes, BMNH 1968183, Mogador (now Essaouira), Atlantic
Morocco (height 12.3 mm, diameter 16.6 mm; height 12.1 mm, diameter 17.3 mm). MNHN, Essaouira
(formerly Mogador), Atlantic Morocco (31° 31' N, 9o 47' W), 1 live-collected male specimen and
several beach-worn shells, leg. Gofas, 23 September 1991. MNHN, El Jadida, Atlantic Morocco (33°
16' N, 8o 29' W), beach worn shells, leg. Gofas, 26 September, 1991. MNHN, Mohammedia (for-
merly Fedala), Atlantic Morocco (33° 43' N, 7o 21' W), 10 beach-worn shells, leg. Gofas, 1970-71.
Description : Because the genus is
monotypic, the description that follows
applies both to the genus and species.
Shell composed of 5 whorls with a low
spire; profile dome-shaped, broader than
high, suture not impressed; whorls weakly
rounded, periphery of immature shell
strongly projecting, forming a keel; periph-
ery spinose in early stages, but losing
spination at maturity; mature shell with
a subangulate base; axial sculpture of fine,
raised lamellae; spiral sculpture of low,
strongly beaded cords; cords between
suture and beaded basal cord increasing
from three in juvenile to 6 at maturity;
base slightly convex, basal cords of com-
parable strength and beading to those of
body whorl, increasing from three in juve-
nile to 8 at maturity; spiral sculpture of
both body whorl and base separated by
narro w interspaces; axial lamellae well
developed in interspaces but not
expressed on surface of nodular beads;
umbilicus open in juvenile shell, closed in
male shell at basal diameter of 9 mm;
remaining open in female shell; umbilicus
of mature female shell bordered by raised,
unbeaded peripheral cord that partially
obstructs final quarter whorl and connects
directly at base of aperture; aperture
oblique, thickened within, descending
slightly on final whorl; interior nacreous,
inner wall of aperture of female shell
smooth, edge with U-shaped sinus; shell
colour brick-red.
Shell dimensions. Mature female
shell (Figs. 1-3): height 13.0, diameter
17.1 mm; immature male shell (Figs. 4-
6): height 4.9, diameter 9.1 mm;
máximum dimensions possible for male
shell unknown; immature female shell
(Figs. 7-9), height 5.9, diameter 9.1 mm.
(Right page) Figures 1-15. Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864). 1-3: Mature, beach-worn female
shell, from Essaouira, Morocco (MNHN), 3 views, height 13.0 mm, diameter 17.1 mm; 4-6: live-
collected, immature male specimen with operculum in place, same locality (MNHN), 3 views,
height 4.9 mm, diameter 9.1 mm; 7-9: immature, beach-worn female shell, from Mohammedia,
Morocco (MNHN), 3 views, height 5.9 mm, diameter 9.1 mm; 10, 11: juvenile beach-worn shell,
from Essaouira, Morocco (MNHN), 2 views, height 2.1 mm, diameter 5.0 mm; 12,13: juvenile
shell with protoconch showing in umbilical view, from Essaouira, Morocco (MNHN), 2 views,
diameter 2.7 mm; 14, 15: operculum of specimen shown in Figures 4-6 and 16, exterior and inte-
rior views, máximum diameter 2.1 mm.
(Página derecha) Figuras 1-15. Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864). 1-3: Concha adulta,
explayada, de una hembra, de Essaouira, Marruecos (MNHN), 3 vistas, altura 13,0 mm, diámetro
17,1 mm; 4-6: ejemplar macho inmaduro, recolectado vivo, con el opérculo cerrando la concha; misma
localidad (MNHN), 3 vistas, altura 4,9 mm, diámetro 9,1 mm; 7-9: concha inmadura, explayada, de
una hembra, de Mohammedia, Marruecos (MNHN), 3 vistas, altura 5,9 mm, diámetro 9,1 mm; 10,
11: concha juvenil explayada, de Essaouira, Marruecos (MNHN), 2 vistas, altura 2,1 mm, diámetro
5,0 mm; 12, 13: concha juvenil con la protoconcha visible desde el ombligo, de Essaouira, Marruecos
(MNHN), 2 vistas, diámetro 2,7 mm; 14, 15: opérculo del ejemplar representado en las Figuras 4-6 y
16, vistas exterior e interior, diámetro máximo 2,1 mm.
56
McLean AND GOFAS: Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
57
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figure 16. Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864). Drawing of living specimen shown in Figures 4-6.
Figura 16. Anadema macandrewii (Morch , 1864). Dibujo del animal vivo, del mismo ejemplar de las
Figuras 4-6.
Juvenile shell (Figs. 10-13) not with
raised axial lamellae, of low profile,
exposing protoconch and early whorls
in basal view; profile not equally bicari-
nate, the upper carination spinose and
more strongly projecting than lower,
non-spinose carination; protoconch and
first teleoconch whorl positioned
slightly below level of second whorl.
Operculum (Figs. 14-15) calcareous,
thick, with a concavity at the base where
the white outer surface is coloured light
reddish-brown. There is a strong ridge
and groove of similar width leading to
the upper part, which bears strong pus-
tules in the región adj acent to the col-
umella; outer edge with a narrow
groove; inner surface becoming broadly
paucispiral in final volution. This oper-
culum is chipped or somehow reduced
at its inner edge, to the extent that the
outline is not oval; the chitinous layer of
the inner surface that shows at the lower
left of Figure 15 is missing at the upper
left.
Flead-foot (Figs. 16-19). Head pro-
portionally large, provided anteriorly
with a snout terminating in a broad.
(Right page) Figures 17-23. Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864). 17-19. Scanning electrón
micrographs of critical-point dried specimen, same as shown in Figure 16. 17: general view of
head-foot; 18: close-up of snout; note the absence of cephalic lappets; 19: close-up of right ante-
rior bundle of epipodial tentacle. 20-23. Scanning electrón micrographs of the radula, same speci-
men as Figure 16. 20: complete radula; 21: close-up of several complete rows; 22: detail of central
and lateral teeth; 23: detail of marginal teeth. Abbreviations, ct: cephalic tentacle; et: epipodial
tentacles; f: foot (pointing to propodium); sn: snout.
(Página derecha) Figuras 17-23. Anadema macandrewii (Morch, 1864). 17-19. Micrografías elec-
trónicas de barrido del ejemplar de la Figura 16 deshidratado por punto crítico. 17: vista general de la
cabeza y del pie; 18: vista aumentada del hocico; nótese la ausencia de lóbulos cefálicos; 19: vista
aumentada de un haz anterior derecho de tentáculos epipodiales. 20-23. Micrografías electrónicas de
barrido de la rádula, ejemplar de la Figura 16. 20: radula completa; 21: vista aumentada de algunas
filas completas; 22: detalle de los dientes centrales y laterales; 23: detalle de los dientes marginales. Abre-
viaturas, ct: tentáculo cefálico; et: tentáculos epipodiales; f: pie (señalado el propodio); sn: hocico.
58
McLean AND GOFAS: Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
59
Iberusy 26 (1), 2008
flattened area surrounding the mouth,
laterally with two prominent, smooth
bulges containing rather large, black
eyes and, next to these on the anterior
side, two slender, villose cephalic tenta-
cles; cephalic lappets lacking. Neck
tobes present, rather symmetrical, undi-
vided. Foot rather small, less than half
the diametre of the shell when
extended; each side of the epipodium
provided in its anterior part with a
cluster of three tentacles, the foremost
on hardly more than a rounded bulge,
the next two tapering and villose,
hardly one-tenth of the cephalic tenta-
cles in size; in the posterior part with
two more tentacles similar in size and
shape to the latter.
Radula (Figs. 20-23) strikingly sym-
metrical, with broad rachidian having
lateral extensions, and moderately long,
tapered overhanging cusps; with four
pairs of similar lateral teeth, which are
elbowed like the rachidian and extend
above the shaft of the next tooth; shaft
of fifth lateral tooth not in cióse contact
with shaft of fourth lateral tooth; this
tooth broad on both sides, with a less
prominent cusp than those of the inner
lateral teeth or any of the marginal
teeth; innermost pair of marginal teeth
with short overhanging cusps, followed
by four pairs of marginal teeth with
longer cusps; outer marginal teeth with
longer shafts, overhanging cusps shorter
and deeply serrate on sides of the cusps.
The live-collected specimen (Figs. 4-
6, 16) reported here (diameter 9.1 mm)
has a nearly closed umbilicus and a gen-
erally unmodified base, with no indica-
tion of the incipient formation of the
DISCUSSION
Knowledge of the genus Anadema
has been slow to develop because the
species A. macandrewii lives in the sublit-
toral zone on rocky bottoms exposed to
strong surf, where there have appar-
ently been few efforts at collecting by
diving due to the exposure, low visibil-
ity, and extensive muddy bottoms off-
shore in relatively shallow water. The
projecting rim of mature female shells; it
is therefore identified as a male speci-
men. There are immature beach-worn
shells of about 10 mm in diameter (Figs.
7-9), which are considered to be female
shells, having the beginning of a project-
ing rim that will form the strong peri-
umbilical angulation of the large female
shell (Fig. 2). It is evident that male
shells are much less frequent among the
beach-worn shells. Because the male
shell with an operculum is larger than
any of the comparable beach-worn
shells considered to be male shells, and
because the lip is immature, there is no
indication from the material at hand as
to the possible size reached by male
shells. It may be that male shells can
reach a size similar to that of female
shells. If so, they would differ from
female shells in having a rounded
umbilical wall, rather than the project-
ing umbilical rim of female shells.
Both male and female shells seal the
umbilicus upon attaining a half-grown
diameter of about 10 mm. The female
shell then proceeds to form a secondary
umbilicus for the brooding cavity. The
initial sealing of the umbilicus may help
to protect the shell from exposure due to
erosión of the apical whorls, which is
also avoided in most marine gastropods
by shell deposition of a plug from
within.
There is variation in the peripheral
spination of immature stages. The
spination of the live-collected male
specimen (Figs. 4-6) is stronger than that
of any of the beach-worn shells of
similar size, whether identified as male
or female.
single live-collected specimen reported
here from the intertidal zone is an
unusual record for the species.
Systematic position: There is now no
doubt that Anadema should be assigned
to the family Colloniidae, on the basis of
shell and opercular characters, charac-
ters of the external anatomy, and the
radula. The fine lamellar sculpture had
60
McLean AND GOFAS: Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
brought to mind a comparison with
Liotiidae, but that is ruled out by the
calcareous operculum.
There are many possibilities for
opercular morphology in the Colloni-
idae, just as there are in the Turbinidae
(see Vermeij and Williams, 2007).
There is no comparative work on the
colloniid operculum, but the operculum
of Anadema is within the range of possi-
ble expression for the family. Immature
shells of the Mediterranean turbinid
species Bolma rugosa (Linnaeus, 1767)
have a resemblance to Anadema macan-
drewii in having a somewhat similar
operculum and a spinose peripheral car-
ination, but mature specimens of Bolma
are much larger, have a higher profile
and an impressed suture, a closed
umbilicus and an expansive columellar
callus that forms a columellar shield
nearly as broad as the aperture. For a
review of Bolma , see Beu and Ponder
(1979). Anadema macandrewii differs from
all illustrated species of Bolma in its low,
dome-shaped profile and open umbili-
cus at maturity.
The keeled early juvenile shells indi-
cate that early sculpture is not evenly
bicarinate, which is a defining feature
for Turbinidae, according to the
restricted definition provided by
Hickman and McLean (1990: 55) at the
previously recognized subfamily level.
Most colloniids have the juvenile shell
with even spiral cords, but there are
exceptions to that generalization. The
keeled early stage brings to mind the
recently described Liotipoma McLean
and Kiel, 2007, in the basal subfamily
Petropomatinae, which also has an early
keel.
The lack of cephalic lappets is consis-
tent with the assignment to Colloniidae,
in which lappets are lacking (Hickman
and McLean, 1990). This is in contrast
to the Turbinidae, in which the lappets
are well-developed (Hickman and
McLean, 1990), albeit they are small in
the Mediterranean Bolma rugosa.
The radular morphology of Anadema
provides convincing evidence that it is
colloniid rather than turbinid because
the tooth rows are perfectly symmetri-
cal, and the inner margináis are not
greatly enlarged. In turbinids, the asym-
metrical tooth row causes the tooth
alignment to be skewed, because the
large inner laterals must altérnate in
zipper fashion when the radula is longi-
tudinally folded (as detailed by
Hickman and McLean, 1990).
Anadema is highly unusual within
Colloniidae for its large size and its
keeled early stage. With its máximum
shell diameter of 17 mm, it may well be
the largest known colloniid. All of the
colloniid radulae illustrated by
Hickman and McLean (1990) have a
secondary flap that projects above the
rachidian tooth; the radula of Anadema
is unusual in not having the secondary
flap. In addition, the morphology of the
fifth lateral of Anadema seems also to be
unusual for the family.
Larval brooding: Brooding of larvae
within the umbilical cavity has been
broadly reported among the Trochoidea
(Hickman, 1992: 254). In the Trochidae
it is known in Margantes vorticiferus, as
shown by Lindberg and Doberteen
(1981). In Liotiidae, it has been reported
for Arene socorroensis by Shasky (1968)
and again by Hertz (1998), and for
"Munditia" subquadrata it has been
reported by Burn (1976). In the Colloni-
idae, it is known in the recently
described genus Liotipoma, as reported
by McLean and Kiel (2007). Its occur-
rence in Anadema is therefore the second
known example. In each of these cases,
the umbilical rim of the female shell is
raised to increase the volume of the
umbilical cavity. Such a modification
can be the only explanation for the
strongly raised umbilical rim of what
we interpret as the female shells of
Anadema macandrewii.
The size reached by the shells of
males remains to be discovered; it is
possible that mature male shells are
smaller than female shells. In support of
that possibility, the operculum illus-
trated here shows the expansión of the
final volution that is characteristic of a
mature operculum. However, this shell
is somewhat immature because the final
lip is not thickened. All beach-worn
61
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
male shells in the material on hand
seem to be immature. The immature
male shells are represented by fewer
specimens than the larger shells attrib-
uted to, for reasons unknown.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Philippe Bouchet and Vir-
ginie Heros of the MNHN for arranging
the loan of the Anadema specimens.
Illustrations of shells (from photos by
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, H., and Adams, A., 1854. Genera of Re-
cent Mollusca, vol. 1. London, John Van
Voorst, 484 pp.
Adams, A., 1855. Further contributions
towards the natural history of the Trochi-
dae; with a description of a new genus,
and of several new species, from the
Cumingian Collection. Proceedings of the
Zoological Society of London, for 1854: 37-41,
pl. 27.
Bellon-Humbert, C., 1974 ("1973")- Les Mol-
lusques marins testacés du Maroc. Catalogue
non critique. Premier supplément. Travaux de
l'Institut Scientifique Chérifien, serie Zoologique,
37, 1-144, 23. pls.
Beu, A. G., and Ponder, W. F., 1979. A revisión
of the species of Bolma Risso, 1826 (Gas-
tropoda: Turbinidae). Records ofthe Australian
Museum, 32 (1): 1-68.
Bouchet, P., and Rocroi, J. P., 2005. Classifi-
cation and Nomenclátor of gastropod fami-
lies. Malacologia, 47 (1-2): 1-397.
Burn, R., 1976. Shell with a built-in nest. Aus-
tralian Shell News, 16: 3.
Fischer, P., 1873. Genre Turbo. Species General
et Iconographie des Coquilles Vivantes [L. C.
Kiener, continué par P. Fischer]. 128 pp., pls.
1-42.
Hertz, C. M., 1998. Arene socorroensis (Strong,
1934) with nestling nepionic larvae. The Fes-
tivus, 30 (5): 65.
Hickman, C. S., 1992. Reproduction and de-
velopment of trochacean gastropods. The
Veliger, 35 (4): 245-272.
Hickman, C. S. and McLean, J. H., 1990. Sys-
tematic revisión and suprageneric classifi-
cation of trochacean gastropods. Natural His-
tory Museum ofLos Angeles County, Science Se-
ries, 35: 1-169.
the first author) were prepared in Photo-
shop by Michelle Schwengel (formerly
LACM) and píate preparation for the
shells was completed by Ángel Valdés
(formerly LACM). Critical-point dried
preparation of the live-collected speci-
men and the SEM views of the head-
foot, as well as the SEM illustrations of
the radula, were provided by Daniel L.
Geiger of the Santa Barbara Museum of
Natural FFistory. We thank the reviewers
for their suggestions, which led to
improvements in the paper.
Keen, A. M., 1960. [Recent Archaeogastropoda].
In Knight, J. B., L. R. Cox, A. M. Keen, R. L.
Batten, E. L. Yochelson, and R. Robertson.
1960. Systematic descriptions (Archaeogas-
tropoda). In Moore, R. C. (Ed.): Treatise on
Invertebrate Paleontology, Part I, Mollusca 1,
pp. 169-310, Geological Society of America
and University of Kansas Press.
Lindberg, D. R. and Doberteen, R. A., 1981.
Umbilical brood protection and sexual di-
morphism in the boreal Pacific trochid gas-
tropod, Margantes vorticiferus Dalí. Interna-
tional Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction, 3:
347-355.
Mórch, O. A. L., 1864. Notes on shells. Amer-
ican Journal of Conchology , 4: 46.
McLean, J. H. and Kiel, S., 2007. Cretaceous
and living Colloniidae of the redefined sub-
family Petropomatinae, with two new gen-
era and one new species, with notes on op-
ercular evolution in turbinoideans, and the
fossil record of Liotiidae (Vetigastropoda:
Turbinoidea). Palaontologische Zeitschrift, 81
(3): 254-266.
Nordsieck, F., 1968. Die europaischen Meeres-
Gehduseschnecken (Prosobranchia) von Eismeer
bis Kapverden und Mittelmeer. Gustav Fischer
Verlag, Stuttgart, 273 pp.
Pallary, P., 1920. Exploration scientifique du
Maroc organisée par la Société de Géographie de
París et continuée par la Société des Sciences Na-
turelles du Maroc. Deuxiéme fascicule. Mala-
cologie (1912). Larose, Rabat and París, 108 p.,
1 pl., 1 map.
Pasteur-Humbert, C., 1962. Les mollusques
marine testacés du Maroc. Catalogue non
critique. I. Les Gasteropodes. Travaux de ITn-
stitut Scientifique Chérifien, serie Zoologie, 23:
1-245.
62
McLean AND GOFAS: Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854
Pilsbry, H. A., 1888. Phasianellinae, Turbinidae,
Delphinulinae. Manual of Conchology, vol. 10,
323 pp., 69 pls. [Neritidae, Adeorbiidae, Cy-
clostrematidae, Liotiidae in this vol. by
George W. Tryon, Jr.]
Shasky, D., 1969. Observations on Rósenla nido-
rum (Pilsbry) and Arene socorroensis (Strong).
The American Malacological Union, Annual
Report for 1967: 74.
Trew, A., 1992. Henry and Arthur Adams's
new molluscan ñames. National Museum of
Wales, Cardiff, 63 pp.
Vermeij, G. J., and Williams, S. T., 2007. Pre-
dation and the geography of opercular thick-
ness in turbinid gastropods. Journal of Mol-
luscan Studies, 73: 67-73.
Wenz, W., 1938. Gastropoda. Handbuch der Palao-
zoologie, vol. 6. Teil 1: Allgemeiner Teil und
Prosobranchia, Berlin, 1639 pp.
Williams, S. T. and Ozawa, T., 2006. Molecu-
lar phylogeny suggests polyphyly of both
the turban shells (family Turbinidae) and
the superfamily Trochoidea (Mollusca: Veti-
gastropoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evo-
lution, 39: 33-51.
63
Iberus, 26 (1): 65-68, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
A new species of Mangelia (Turridae: Mangeliinae) from the
Mediterranean Sea
Una nueva especie de Mangelia (Turridae: Mangeliinae) del
Mediterráneo
Charles CACHIA* and Constantine MIFSUD**
Recibido el 17-VII-2007. Aceptado el 12-III-2008
ABSTRACT
A new species Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., from Malta, is introduced and compared with
other similar congeneric species.
RESUMEN
Se describe una nueva especie Mangelia melitensis, de Malta, y se compara con especies
congenéricas de aspecto similar.
KEY WORDS: Mollusca, Conoidea, Turridae, Mangeliinae, Mangelia nov. sp., Mediterranean.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Mollusca, Conoidea, Turridae, Mangeliinae, Mangelia nov. sp., Mediterráneo.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Mangelia is represented in
the Mediterranean Sea by about 28
species (CLEMAM 2007). The shells are
slender, fusiform in shape, with a sculp-
ture consisting of axial, and often spiral
sculpture. The siphonal canal is short
and open and the columella is smooth
without any processes. The mollusc has
a wide foot, long tentacles with eyes sit-
uated on the sides of the stalks and at
about 2/ 3 their height, a long siphon and
the body is mostly of a transparent
white colouration, but sometimes with
opaque coloured streaks or blotches,
especially on the siphon. The radula
consists of hollow marginal teeth, rarely
barbed, with an irregular basal swelling
(McLean, 1971). The animal lacks an
operculum. The diet consists mainly of
* 1, Alley 1, St. Catherine Street, Qormi QRM, Malta
** 5, Triq ir-Rghajja, Rabat RBT 2486, Malta
polychaete worms, sometimes larger
than the mollusc itself. (C. M. pers. obs.)
Certain authors (Bouquoy,
Dautzenberg and Dollfus, 1883;
Powell, 1966; van Aartsen and Fehr
de Wal, 1978) have proposed that the
Mediterranean species classification
should be separated into two genera,
Mangelia (Risso, 1826) type species Man-
gelia attenuata (Montagu, 1803) and
Mangiliella (B.D.D., 1826) type species
Mangiliella multilineolata (Deshayes,
1836). The proposition is based on the
type of development of the protoconch.
Mangelia has a multi-spiral or plank-
totrophic type of protoconch, usually
consisting of 2 l/i or more whorls while
Mangiliella has a paucispiral or direct
type of protoconch consisting of 1 1 /lio
65
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
2 whorls. Although this arrangement is
very convenient for separating the
species, Bouchet (1990) advised against
such methods for creating genera and
subgenera in this already problematic
family.
The Mediterranean species have
been dealt with by several authors
(Nordsieck, 1977; van Aartsen and
Fehr de Wal, 1978; Sabelli, Giannuzzi-
-Savelli and Bedulli, 1990; Cachia,
Mifsud and Sammut, 2001; Gruppo
Malacologico Livornese and Gruppo
Malacologica Romagnolo, 2005).
During our ongoing research on the
marine mollusca which inhabit the
coasts of the Maltese Islands, we have
come across many specimens of a dis-
tinct Mangelia species which is new to
Science. It will be introduced herein.
SYSTEMATICS
Superfamily Conoidea Vaught, 1989
Family Turridae Swainson, 1840
Subfamily Mangeliinae Vaught, 1989
Genus Mangelia Risso, 1826
Mangelia melitensis nov. sp. (Figs. 1, 2)
Material studied: All studied material is from the Maltese Islands. Holotvpe. collection number
BMNH 20070312 (H= 6mm, W= 2.5mm), and two paratypes, collection number BMNH
20070313, off Gnejna Bay, in sand and algae from 40 m., x-2006, The Natural History Museum,
London. Three paratypes, off Ras il-Wahx, 35 m., ix-1992, collection number MNHN 9988,
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, París. Three paratypes, off Rdum id-Delli, 50 m., ix-2006,
collection number. TAU MO 57001, National Collections of Natural History, Department of
Zoology, Tel Aviv University. Four paratypes, off Ras il-Wahx, 25-30 m., ix-1992, and three
paratypes, St Thomas Bay, 3-4 m., viii-1987, National Museum of Natural History (Mdina,
Malta). Other Paratypes: Salina Bay, 4 m viii-2000, 21 shells; off Rdum id-Delli, 60 m, viii-2006, 5
shells; off Cirkewwa Point, 34 m, viii-1996, 14 shells, in prívate collection of Charles Cachia. [Coll.
No 1185]. Off St. Paul's Bay, 40-50 m., ix-1986, 3 shells; Qammieh, Cumnija, 50 m., viii-1986, 4
shells; St. Thomas Bay, 3-4 m., viii-1987, 11 shells; Bahar ic-Caghaq, beached, i-1991, 5 shells;
Gozo Island, Dwejra, Coral cave, in sand, 25 m., 1 shell, 9-vi-2001 (leg. Anthony Sammut); off
Golden Bay, 40 m, iii-1991, 9 shells; off Ras il-Wahx, 25-30 m., ix-1992, 31 shells off Rdum id-
Delli, 50 m., ix-2006, 9 shells, in prívate collection of Constantine Mifsud [coll. No. M1601]. Off
Ras il-Wahx, 25-30 m., ix-1992, 2 shells, in prívate collection of Charles Sammut. Salina Bay, 4 m.,
viii-1998, 2 shells (C. Cachia leg.), in prívate collection of Gert Lindner.
Type locality: Gnejna Bay, Maltese Islands.
Etymology: Named after the type locality.
Description : Shell small, rather fragüe,
fusiform, typical of the genus. Proto-
conch consists of 2 1 ¡i, rounded, trans-
parent white, glassy whorls, the last with
a few small, close-set axial riblets crossed
by spiral micro-striae. Teleoconch con-
sists of up to four whorls which are sub-
angulated at their adapical third and
curving regularly towards the suture.
Sculpture of 8-9 narrow, flexuous, slight-
ly opisthocline, axial ribs which continué
to the base. Their interspaces are about
twice as wide. The whole surface of the
shell is covered with dense micro-spiral
striae of about the same thickness and
close-set axial growth lines, producing
an iridescent pattern. There are about 45-
50 of these micro-spiral striae at the
penultimate whorl. There are also 5-6
well spaced, thicker spiral chords at the
base of the shell, near the siphonal canal.
Aperture about half height of shell. Out-
er lip sharp, thin and fragüe, thickened
internally, with its topmost part clearly
curved. Lip varix present in some speci-
mens. Sinus shallow. Columella smooth.
66
Cachia AND MlFSUD: A new species of Mangelia from the Mediterranean Sea
Figure 1. Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., shells. A: holotype from off Gnejna Bay, in sand and algae,
40 m (height 6 mm); B: paratype from the type locality (height 6 mm); C, D: paratype from off
Ras il-Wahx, 25-30 m (height 6.1 mm).
Figura 1. Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., conchas. A: holotipo, frente a Gnejna Bay, en arena y algas, 40
m (altura 6 mm); B: paratipo de la localidad tipo (altura 6 mm); C, D: paratipo, frente a Ras
il—Wahx, 25-30 m (altura 6,1 mm).
Siphonal canal short and wide. The shell
colour is white or beige. Rarely, some
specimens are decorated with four, faint,
brownish spiral bands or with tiny,
brown sub-sutural blotches on the
penultimate whorl, while others have a
dark blotch at the middle of the exterior
of the outer lip. A single specimen is
completely brown.
DISCUSSION
M. melitensis nov. sp. had already
been introduced as Mangelia sp. A. in
Cachia et al. (2001). It differs from all
the other Mediterranean forms of the
M. unifasciata (Deshayes, 1835)
complex, to which it is very similar, by
the lack of bold spiral cords on its
whorls. It is similar in this respect to M.
costulata Risso, 1826 [= M. smithii
(Forbes, 1840)], but in that species the
spiral striae are fewer, flatter, much
bolder, and continuous, not crossed by
growth lines, while their interspaces
are deeply incised. Mangelia costulata
never forms a thickened rib on the
The animal is transparent white with
large black eyes at about two-thirds of
the height of the tentacle stems. The foot
has opaque white spots, while the
siphon has small opaque yellowish
spots. There is no operculum.
The species is found near or in Posi-
donia oceánica (Linnaeus) Delile, substra-
tum at depths of 3 to 50 metres.
aperture, unlike the present species:
Moreover, in M. costulata the last proto-
conch whorl has a bold reticulate type
of sculpture, whilst in M. melitensis nov.
sp. this whorl has only close-set flex-
uous axials with spiral micro-striae. M.
costulata usually has a continuous wide
brown band on the ultimate whorl and
the animal has a bright orange spotted
siphon.
Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., also
offers similarities to Mangelia costata
(Donovan, 1804). In that species
however the whorls are very evenly
convex not somewhat subangulated as
67
ikrus, 26 (1), 2008
Figure 2. Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., scanning electrón micrographs, same paratype as Figures
1C-D. A: protoconch; B: detail of the sculpture on a spire whorl.
Figure 2. Mangelia melitensis nov. sp., vistas en microscopía electrónica, mismo paratipo que las Figura
1 C-D. A: protoconcha; B: detalle de la escultura en una vuelta de la espira.
in Mangelia melitensis nov. sp. The shell
is also smaller, rather glossy, differently
coloured, of a more fusiform aspect and
with a slightly different protoconch. The
animal is completely white.
Distribution: The Maltese Islands.
The authors have not come across any
specimens of M. melitensis nov. sp. from
any other Mediterranean locality.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Buquoy, E., Dautzenberg, P. and Dollfus,
G., 1882-1886. Les Mollusques marins du Rous-
sillon. I: Gastropodes. París, Bailliére, 570 pp.
Bouchet, P., 1990. Turrid genera and mode of
development: The use and abuse of proto-
conch morphology. Malacologia, 32 (1): 69-77.
Cachia, C., Mifsud, C. and Sammut, P., 2001.
The Marine Mollusca of the Maltese Islands,
Part 3 Neogastropoda, Backhuys Publishers,
266 pp.. Leiden.
CLEMAM, Unitas Malacologica; Checklist of
European Marine Mollusca: Web Page:
http: / / www.somali.asso.fr /clemam/bio-
taxis.php [accessed 5-vi-2007]
Gruppo Malacologico Livornese and
Gruppo Malacologico Romagnolo, 2005.
Nota sulle Mangelia Mediterranee. Notiziario
S.I.M., 23 (9-12): 22-33.
MacLean, J. H., 1971. A revised classification
of the Family Turridae, with the proposal
of new Subfamilies, genera and subgenera
from the eastem Pacific. The Veliger, 14 (1):
114-130.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank our colleague
P. Sammut (Rabat, Malta) for revising the
manuscript and G. Lindner (Germany) for
his kind disposition. The scanning elec-
trón micrographs for this paper were pro-
duced at the University of Málaga with
the help of Gregorio Martín Caballero.
Mifsud, C., 1998. The molluscan species living
in Maltese Posidonia meadows. La Conchiglia,
30 (287): 37-48, 61.
Nordsieck, F., 1977. Turridae of the European
Seas. "La Pirámide" for La Conchiglia, 131 pp.
Rome.
Nordsieck, F., 1982. Die europaischen Meeres-
Gehauseschnecken. 2nd edition. 539 pp. Gus-
tav Fischer, Stuttgart
Powell, A. W. B. 1966. The Molluscan families
Speightiidae and Turridae. Bulletin of the
Auckland Institute and Museum, 5, 184 pp. +
23 plates. New Zealand.
Sabelli, B., Gianuzzi-Savelli, R. and Bedulli,
D., 1990. Catalogo annotato dei molluschi
marini del Mediterráneo, S. I. M. Librería Nat-
uralística Bolognese, Vol. 1. xiv, 1-348. Bologna.
van Aarsten, J. J. and Fehr de Wahl, M.C.,
1978. The sub family Mangeliinae Fischer,
1887 in the Mediterranean. Conchiglie, 14 (3-
6): 97-110.
68
© Sociedad Española de Malacologí
Iberas , 26 (1): 69-80, 2008
Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo
de Valencia (España)
Checklist of the marine bivalves in the central sector of the Gulf of
Valencia (Spain)
Jorge C. TAMAYO GOYA*
Recibido el 12-11-2007. Aceptado el 31-III-2008
RESUMEN
Se presenta una lista con 1 84 especies de Bivalvos marinos citados en la literatura y rea>
lectados por el autor entre 1998 y 2008, en la costa del Golfo de Valencia, sector cen-
tral: 39° 42' N, 0o 12' W (Playa de Canet de Berenguer, Sagunto) - 38° 55' N, 0o 03#
W (Playa de Oliva), Mediterráneo occidental. Cari fervensis se cita por primera vez en ¡a
zona y se confirma la existencia de poblaciones establecidas de Eastonia rugosa, Fulvia
fragilis y Lentidium mediterraneum.
ABSTRACT
A list is presented with 1 84 species of marine Bivalves cited in the literature or collected
by the author between 1 998 and 2007, along the coast of Gulf of Valencia, central sec-
tor: 39° 42' N, 0o 12' W (Playa de Canet de Berenguer, Sagunto) - 38° 55' N, 0o 03'
W (Playa de Oliva), Western Mediterranean. Gari fervensis is cited for the first time in the
area and the occurrence of established populations is confirmed for Eastonia rugosa, Ful-
via fragilis and Lentidium mediterraneum.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Catálogo, moluscos, bivalvos, Golfo de Valencia, Mar Mediterráneo.
KEY WORDS: Checklist, molluscs, bivalves, Gulf of Valencia, Mediterranean Sea.
INTRODUCCIÓN
En este trabajo se presenta una actua-
lización de la lista faunística de moluscos
bivalvos de la Bahía de Valencia. Estos
complementan un catálogo reciente-
mente publicado (Oliver Baldoví, 2007)
donde se aporta una actualización de
Gasterópodos marinos testáceos de la
zona sur del Golfo de Valencia.
La gran mayoría de las conchas reco-
lectadas son explayadas, por lo que no se
puede indicar su hábitat originario. En
mucha menor medida, se han obtenido
buceando a pulmón-con tubo (entre -2 y
-3 m) o recogidas por una embarcación
"marisquera" faenando a escasos metros
de la costa (zona infralitoral). Las recogi-
das de muestras se han ido realizando a
lo largo de todas las estaciones entre los
años 1998 y 2008 y no se ha seguido una
metodología concreta.
Los sustratos sedimentarios que
constituyen el hábitat de las comunida-
des presentes en el piso infralitoral son,
las correspondientes a: arenas finas
* C/Polo y Peyrolón, 37, izda 16, 46201, Valencia.
69
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figura 1 . Localidades de muestreo en el Golfo de Valencia.
Figure 1. Sampling sites in Gulf of Valencia.
superficiales, arenas finas bien calibra-
das (entre -2/ -3 m. y -20/ -25 m.), arenas
finas fangosas (entre -20/-25 m. y -35/-
40 m.), arenas con proporciones peque-
ñas de finos (<15%) (consideradas como
transición entre ambos sustratos) y los
fondos detríticos.
El sustrato rocoso está presente en
mucha menor medida, lo mismo que las
praderas de Posidonia oceánica (en
mucha mayor proporción de mata
muerta que degradada, y que suele
extenderse en una distribución batimé-
trica entre -5 m y -20 m), así como la
Cymodocea nodosa y la Caulerpa prolifera.
Las arenas gruesas y gravillas, ocupan
franjas a profundidades variables y
sujetas a corrientes marinas.
A continuación en profundidad, en
la plataforma continental, está el piso
circalitoral (entre -40 m. y -100 m.), de
escasa pendiente, en el que están pre-
sentes los fondos detríticos costeros. Los
fondos fangosos terrígenos (a partir de -
100/-150 m.) se extienden por zonas
muy amplias del fondo marino.
El litoral en estudio, eminentemente
sedimentario, se caracteriza por la suce-
sión casi continuada de playas de arena
fina, sólo interrumpidas por las instala-
ciones portuarias, las desembocaduras
fluviales (áreas de fondos fangosos) y el
Cabo de Cullera (acantilado mediano)
Las poblaciones en cuyas playas se
han efectuado la recogida de ejemplares
son colindantes entre sí y han sido agru-
padas, de norte a sur, en las siguientes
subzonas (Fig. 1), siendo la B y la D en
donde mayor número de muéstreos se
han realizado:
A: (Canet d'En Berenguer), Sagunto,
Puzol y El Puig. Predominan las arenas
finas bien calibradas, en mucha menor
medida las de arenas finas fangosas y
las extensiones de mata muerta de Posi-
donia. El puerto de Sagunto y el puerto
deportivo de Canet de Berenguer, la
planta siderúrgica de Sagunto, el emisa-
rio de Canet de Berenguer, y la desem-
bocadura del río Palancia, son agentes
determinantes en la configuración sedi-
mentaria de esta zona del litoral.
70
Tamayo GOYA: Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
B: Puebla de Farnals, Massamagrell,
Meliana, Alboraya y las playas al norte
de Valencia. Las arenas finas fangosas
predominan sobre las arenas finas bien
calibradas. Es de mencionar el sustrato
rocoso frente al Puerto de Valencia y las
extensiones de mata muerta de
Posidonia, en mayor superficie que las de
la subzona A. Él puerto deportivo de
Port sa Playa, el Barranco de Carraixet y
el emisario de Vera (al norte del Puerto
de Valencia), son los agentes de esta
subzona.
C: Playas al sur de Valencia. Hay
mucho mayor predominio de las arenas
finas bien calibradas sobre las arenas
finas fangosas. El Puerto de Valencia, la
desembocadura del río Turia, el emisa-
rio del sur del Puerto y las Golas del
Pujol y de El Perellonet (provenientes de
La Albufera), son los agentes a destacar.
D: Sueca y Cullera . Es la subzona
con mayor proporción de arenas finas
bien calibradas y con menor de finas
fangosas en el área de estudio. A
reseñar también, la presencia de mata
muerta de Posidonia en el afloramiento
rocoso frente a Cullera. Cabe mencionar
en esta subzona, la desembocadura del
Jucar y las Golas de El Perelló y la del
Estany.
E: Tavernes de la Valldigna, Xeraco,
Xeresa, Gandía, Daimuz, Guardamar,
Miramar, Piles y Oliva. Las arenas finas
fangosas predominan sobre las finas
bien calibradas. Frente a Gandía existe
otro enclave rocoso con presencia de
Posidonia. Los puertos de Gandía y
Oliva, constituyen lo más destacable
como agentes determinantes.
SISTEMÁTICA
En la Tabla I se presenta el listado de
especies encontradas en el área de
estudio, junto con el número de especí-
menes encontrados, sus sectores de dis-
tribución y citas bibliográficas. Esta lista
ha sido ordenada de acuerdo con la cla-
sificación propuesta por CLEMAM.
Check List of European Marine
Mollusca: chttp:// www.somali-
asso.fr/ demarro .
DISCUSIÓN
Glycymeris violacescens (Lamarck, 1819)
Es una especie muy presente en gran
parte del litoral de Valencia que con fre-
cuencia se muestra con un polimorfismo
y policromía muy característicos (Fig. 2),
predominando el contorno de la concha
menos subcuadrangular, muchas veces
más oblicua; el color gris negruzco-
azulado, principalmente en la mitad
superior y umbo, combinado con los
colores tierra (beige y marrón) y con
mucha mayor superficie de mancha en
el interior de la valva; generalmente, los
umbos más separados y con mayor área
cardinal; cohabitando en proporciones
similares con los ejemplares más
comunes-tipo, más frecuentemente
divulgados (Fig. 3).
Fulviafragilis (Forsskal in Niehbur, 1775)
Se confirma (Fig. 4) la presencia en la
zona de esta especie, previamente citada
en Cullera por Zenetos et al. (2004) a
partir de ejemplares recolectados en
1991. Ello indica que esta especie está
formando poblaciones perennes en la
zona, al igual que sucede en otras partes
del Mediterráneo (Crocetta, 2005;
Vardala-Theodorou , 1999).
Eastonia rugosa (Helbling, 1779)
Especie presente ocasionalmente en
este sector del Golfo de Valencia, salvo en
la subzona B en la que si es habitual
hallarla. En la playa de Meliana (subzona
B) es donde se concentra la gran mayoría
de los individuos de esta especie encon-
trados en esta zona del litoral (Fig. 5).
Decenas y decenas de conchas de indivi-
duos jóvenes y adultos son depositadas
todos los años en esta playa. En esta
subzona B, también se localiza una impor-
tante concentración de ejemplares, aunque
en menor medida, de Lutraria magna (da
Costa, 1778) y Venericardia antiquata (Linné,
1758). Es de notar que esta especie mani-
fiesta una tendencia a ampliar su exten-
sión en el Mediterráneo, siendo reciente-
mente observada en abundancia en las
costas italianas en localidades donde no
se conocía anteriormente (La Valle, Vani,
Liboni y Smriglio, 2007).
71
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Tabla I. Listado de especies encontradas en el área de estudio. Ej: concha recolectada explayada;
Ej*: entre 1 y 3 ejemplares recolectados; Ej*: entre 1 y 3 ejemplares recolectados, deteriorados; L:
especie presente en la colección de referencia del laboratorio de Biología Marina de la Universidad
de Valencia (1982-1989, García Carrascosa, no publicado) o citada en la bibliografía reseñada, sin
ejemplar recolectado por el autor. Las letras (ABCDE) corresponden a los sectores de la Figura 1
en los que se han recolectado ejemplares. Las referencias a las citas se indican como sigue: (1)
Colección de referencia del laboratorio de la Universidad de Valencia; (2) ApáRICI SEGUER,
Rowland, Taylor y García Carrascosa, 1996; (3) Bonnin y Rodríguez Babio, 1990; (4)
Costa, García Carrascosa, Monzó, Peris, Stubing y Valero, 1984; (3) Generalitat
Valenciana, Conselleria de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente, 1994-1997; (6) Giner
Ponce, 1989; (7) Hidalgo, 1917; (8) Montero Agüera, 1971; (9) Ramón Herrero, 1993;
(10) ROSELLÓ, 1910; (11) SÁNCHEZ Diana, 1980. Los nombres subrayados corresponden a las
especies que están comentadas en este trabajo.
Tal? le I. List of the species found in the studied urea. Ej: shell collected on the beach; Ej*: 1 to 3 speci-
mens found; Ej*: 1 to 3 specimens found, damaged; L: species found in the reference collection deposited
in the Marine Biology laboratory ofthe University of Valencia (1982-1989, García Carrascosa, unpu-
blished data) or cited in literature, no specimens collected by the author. Letters (ABCDE) refer to
Figure 1 sectors. Literature cited as follows: (1) reference collection deposited in the laboratory ofthe
University of Valencia; (2) APARICI SEGUER, R.OWLAND, TAYLOR AND GARCIA CARRASCOSA, 1996;
(3) Bonnin y Rodríguez Babio, 1990; (4) Costa, García Carrascosa, Monzó, Peris,
Stubing and Valero, 1984; (5) Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Agricultura y
Medio Ambiente, 1994-1997; (6) Giner Ponce, 1989; (7) Hidalgo, 1917; (8) Montero
Agüera, 1971; (9) Ramón Herrero, 1993; (10) Roselló, 1910; (11) Sánchez Diana, 1980.
Underlined ñames are discussed in this paper.
72
Tamayo Goya: Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
73
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
74
TAMAYO GOYA: Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
75
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
76
Tamayo Goya: Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
Gari fervensis (Gmelin, 1791)
Esta epecie tampoco está citada en
los trabajos anteriormente relacionados,
pero también habita de forma perenne
en la Bahía de Valencia (Fig. 6). No es
frecuente su presencia en el litoral exa-
minado, aunque tampoco lo es de forma
ocasional. Se pueden localizar, año tras
año, individuos jóvenes y adultos en las
mismos emplazamientos y con similar
frecuencia y abundancia que su congé-
nere, Gari depressa (Pennant, 1777).
Lentidium mediterraneum (Costa O.G.,
1829)
Diversos trabajos escalonados en el
tiempo, (recientes: Aparici et al., 1989;
García Carrascosa, 1988; y menos
reciente. Montero Agüera, 1971)
además de los ejemplares localizados
por el autor en Puebla de Farnals, Valen-
cia, Sueca y Cullera, entre 2004 y 2007
(Fig. 7), evidencian la presencia no de
forma esporádica, de esta especie a lo
largo de todo el litoral en estudio.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Mi más sincera gratitud y reconoci-
miento por su generosa y desinteresada
colaboración, a Celso Rodríguez Babío y
Manuel García Carrascosa, ambos de la
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de
Valencia, por su permanente ánimo,
apoyo y por la mucha bibliografía pro-
porcionada. Mención especial merece el
artículo escrito por Bonin y Rodríguez
(1991) que ha sido punto de referencia
obligado para la elaboración de este
trabajo. A Carmen Salas Casanova y
Serge Gofas, ambos de la Facultad de
Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, por su
decisiva colaboración, ayuda y correc-
ciones, sin las cuales no hubiera sido
posible este artículo. A Javier Segarra
Julve y colaboradores, Francisco Ruiz
Sánchez y Emilio Valero Alfaro, todos
ellos de la Generalitat Valenciana, Con-
sellería de Agricultura Pesca y Alimen-
tación, por su colaboración en propor-
cionar los documentos relacionados en
77
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figura 2. Glycymeris violacescens (Lamarck, 1819), ejemplares hallados en Mareny Blau (Sueca).
Longitud de la mayor concha encontrada: 67 mm. Figura 3. Glycymeris violacescens (Lamarck,
1819), ejemplares hallados en Cullera. Longitud de la mayor concha encontrada: 64 mm.
Figure 2. Glycymeris violacescens ( Lamarck , 1819), specimens collected in Mareny Blau (Sueca).
Length ofthe biggest shell found: 67 mm. Figure 3. Glycymeris violacescens (Lamarck, 1819), speci-
mens collected in Cullera. Length ofthe biggest shell found : 64 mm.
78
Tamayo GOYA: Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
Figura 4. Fulvia fragilis (Forsskal in Niehbur, 1775), ejemplares hallados en Cullera (izquierda) y
Oliva (derecha). Longitud de la mayor concha encontrada: 42 mm. Figura 5. Conchas de Eastonia
rugosa recolectadas en Meliana. Longitud de la mayor concha encontrada: 80 mm. Figura 6. Gari
fervensis , ejemplar hallado en Cullera. Longitud de la mayor concha encontrada: 35 mm. Figura 7.
Conchas de Lentidium mediterraneum recolectadas en Mareny Blau (Sueca). Longitud de la mayor
concha encontrada por el autor de esta especie: 8 mm.
Figure 4. Fulvia fragilis (Forsskal in Niehbur, 1775), specimens collected in Cullera (left) and Oliva
( ñght). Length ofthe biggest shell found: 42 mm. Figure 5. Eastonia rugosa shells collected in Meliana.
Length ofthe biggest shell found: 80 mm. Figure 6. Gari fervensis, specimen collected in Cullera.
Length ofthe biggest shell found: 35 mm. Figura 7. Lentidium mediterraneum shells collected in
Mareny Blau (Sueca). Length ofthe biggest shell found: 8 mm.
79
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
la bibliografía. A Rafael Araujo Armero,
del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de
Madrid, Alberto Martínez-Ortí, del
Museo de Historia Natural de Valencia;
Margarita Belinchón García, del Museo
de Ciencias Naturales de Valencia y
Francesc Uribe Porta, del Museo de
Ciencias Naturales de la Ciutadella
(Barcelona), por su colaboración en faci-
litar la consulta de ejemplares de las res-
pectivas colecciones y, en algún caso,
bibliografía. A Isabel Morón Marchante
y Mercedes González de Quevedo, de la
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Aparici Seguer, V., Rowland, R. A., Taylor,
S. y García Carrascosa, M., 1996. Molus-
cos infralitorales de la playa del Pinedo-El Sa-
ler (Valencia, Mediterráneo occidental). Lbe-
rus, 14 (2): 93-100.
Bonnin J., Rodríguez Babio C., 1991. Catá-
logo provisional de los moluscos bivalvos
marinos de la plataforma continental de las
costas mediterráneas de la Península Ibérica
y de las islas Baleares. Iberus, 9 (1-2): 97-110.
Bosca Seytre, A., 1916. Fauna valenciana.
Moluscos. Casa Editorial de Alberto Martín,
132 p.
Cejalvo Lapeña, M. D., 1998. Peces, crustáceos
y moluscos de la Comunidad Valenciana. Con-
selleria d'Agricultura, Pesca i Alimentació,
239 p.
Costa, M., García Carrascosa, A. M., Monzó
F., Peris, J. B., Stubing, G. y Valero, E., 1984.
Estado actual de la flora y fauna marinas en el li-
toral de la Comunidad Valenciana. Ayunta-
miento de Castellón. 239 p.
Crocetta, F., 2005. Prime segnalazioni di Ful-
via fragilis (Forskal in Niebuhr, 1775) (Mo-
llusca: Bivalvia: Cardiidae) per i mari ita-
liani. Bollettino Malacologico, 41 (5-8): 23-24.
García Carrascosa, M., Silvestre Martínez,
R. Y Pérez Yuste, C., 1989. Los Fondos ma-
rinos. En Sanchis Molí, E. J. (Ed.): Guía de la
Naturaleza de la Comunidad Valenciana. Le-
vante - El Mercantil Valenciano, 611-652.
Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de
Agricultura y Medio Ambiente, Direc-
ción General de Producción Agraria y
Pesca, Servicio de Pesca. 1994-1997. Carac-
terísticas bionómicas y cartografiado del bentos
en el litoral de Valencia, Castellón y Alicante.
Giner Ponce, I. M., 1989. Moluscos y comunidades
bentónicas de la costa de Alboraya-Albuixech
(Golfo de Valencia, Mediterráneo occidental). Te-
sis de Licenciatura. Universitat de Valencia,
225 pp
Biblioteca del Museo Nacional de Cien-
cias Naturales de Madrid, Sandra Valen-
tín Monte y Montserrat Navarro
Codina, de la Biblioteca del Museo de
Ciencias Naturales de la Ciutadella
(Barcelona), por su colaboración en faci-
litarme, a pesar de la distancia, la biblio-
grafía solicitada. A Francisco Figueres
López y a Alfredo His Rocher, ambos de
la Cofradía de Pescadores de Cullera
por haber permitido el acompañamiento
durante el marisqueo en la embarcación
MAYEL propiedad de F Figueres.
Hidalgo, J. G., 1917. Fauna malacológica de Es-
paña, Portugal y las Baleares. Trabajos del
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, serie
Zoología, 30: 752 pp.
La Valle, P., Vani, D., Liboni, A., y Smriglio,
C., 2007. Eastonia rugosa (Helbling, 1799) (Bi-
valvia, Mactridae) occurring along the Latium
coasts. Basteria, 71(1-3): 93-95.
Montero Agüera, I., 1971. Moluscos bivalvos
españoles. Anales de la Universidad Hispalense,
serie Veterinaria, 5: 1-358 + 95 láminas no nu-
meradas.
Pla, E., 2006. Guía submarina de La Marina Alta
e Ibiza. Publicado por el autor, 350 pp.
Ramón Herrero, M., 1993. Estudio de las po-
blaciones de Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758)
y Donax trunculus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Mollusco:
Bivalvia) en el Golfo de Valencia (Mediterráneo
Occidental). Tesis doctoral, Univ. Barcelona:
395pp.
Roselló, E., 1910. Los moluscos de Valencia.
Asociación Española para el Progreso de las Cien-
cias. Congreso de Valencia, Sección 4 (Ciencias
Naturales ): 1-7.
Sánchez Diana, A., 1980. Los moluscos marinos
del Reino de Valencia. Instituto de Estudios
Alicantnos. Diputación Provincial de Ali-
cante. 154 p.
Vardala-Theodorou, G. E., 1999. The occur-
rence of the Indo-Pacific molluscan species
Fulvia fragilis (Forsskal, 1775) and Bulla am-
pulla L., 1758 in Elefsis Bay. Newslletter ofthe
Hellenic Zoological Society, 31: 10-11.
Zenetos, A., Gofas, S., Russo, G. y Templado,
]., 2004. CIESM Atlas ofexotic species in the Me-
diten anean. Vol. 3: Molluscs (F. Briand, ed.).
Monaco: CIESM, 376 pp..
80
Iberus, 26 (1): 81-170, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae (Caenogastropoda,
Triphoroidea) with the description of 26 new species
Nuevos datos sobre los Triphoridae ( Caenogastropoda , Triphoroidea)
del Caribe , con la descripción de 26 nuevas especies
Emilio ROLÁN* and Raúl FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS**
Recibido el 24-IX-2007. Aceptado el 31-III-2008
ABSTRACT
In the present work 68 taxa of the family Triphoridae from the Caribbean and adjacent
areas are studied. Comments are also provided on one invalid taxon and on another that
has been erroneously reported from this area. Among these, 30 were previously known
species and 26 are described as new ( Metaxia propinqua , M. propria, M. prompto, Isot-
riphora guanahacabibes, Eutriphoro ouffenbergi , Marshallora ostenta , Marshallora apex-
diversus, Inella pseudolongissima , I. noduloides, I. apexbilirata , I. harryleei, I. undeber-
muda, I. pseudotorticula, I. differens, I. slapcinskyi , I. faberi , Sagenotriphora candidula,
"T." inaudita, "T." pseudonovem, " T. " yociusi, " T. " guadaloupensis, "T." amicorum, "T."
turtlebayensis, "T." grenadensis, "T." abacoensis a nd "T." portoricensis). Twelve species
remain unnamed or are tentatively identified, due to scarcity or ¡nadequacy of available
material, or doubtful specific assignment. New information is reported for Monophorus oli-
vaceus (Dalí, 1889) and Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1995)
already treated in previous works.
Lectotypes are designated and figured for the following species Inella bigemma (Watson,
1880) , Inella ¡nflata (Watson, 1880), Inella longissima (Dalí, 1881), Inella trlserialis (Dalí,
1881) , Inella intermedia (Dalí, 1881), Inella ibex (Dalí, 1881), Inella torticula (Dalí,
1881), Inella colon (Dalí, 1881), Inella compsa (Dalí, 1927), Inella enopla (Dalí, 1927),
Inella meteoro (Dalí, 1927), Inella pompona (Dalí, 1927), Inella dinea (Dalí, 1927), Inella
sentoma (Dalí, 1927), Inella gaesona (Dalí, 1927), "Triphora" cylindrella (Dalí, 1927),
"Triphora" abrupta (Dalí, 1881), "Triphora" caracca Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" georgiana
Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" indígena Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" lilacina (Dalí, 1889), "Triphora"
pyrrha Henderson and Bartsch, 1914, Triphora" atlántica (E. A. Smith, 1890) and for the
western Atlantic species Triphora aspera Jeffreys, 1 885.
A list of the ñames employed for Caribbean species of Triphoridae is given, mentioning
mistakes and synonymies.
RESUMEN
En el presente trabajo se estudian 68 taxones de la familia Triphoridae del Caribe y aguas
próximas. También se aporta información sobre un taxon que carece de validez y otro erró-
neamente mencionado para el área. Entre ellos, 30 corresponden a especies previamente
conocidas, 26 se describen como nuevas para la ciencia [Metaxia propinqua, M. propria,
M. prompta, Isotriphora guanahacabibes, Eutriphora auffenbergi, Marshallora ostenta , Mars-
hallora apexdiversus, Inella pseudolongissima, I. noduloides, I. apexbilirata, I. harryleei, I.
* Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
** Centro de Estudios Ambientales de Cienfuegos (CEAC), Grupo de Gestión Ambiental (GGA), calle 17,
esquina Ave. 46, Cienfuegos, Cuba.
81
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
undebermuda , I. pseudotorticula, I. differens, I. slapcinskyi , I. faberi, Sagenotriphora candi-
dula, "T." inaudita, "T." pseudonovem, “T." yociusi, "T." guadaloupensis, "T." amicorum, "T."
turtlebayensis, "T." grenadensis, "T" abacoensis y "T." portoricensis) y o 1 2 de ellas no se les
asigna un nombre definitivo debido a la escasez del material, o al mal estado del mismo, y
también a la existencia de dudas sobre su determinación. Además, se aporta nueva infor-
mación sobre Monophorus olivaceus (Dalí, 1 889) y Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán y Fer-
nández-Garcés, 1 995), especies ya citadas en trabajos previos.
Se designan y figuran lectotipos de las siguientes especies: Inella bigemma (Watson,
1 880), Inella inflata (Watson, 1 880), Inella longissima (Dalí, 1881), Inella triserialis (Dalí,
1881), Inella intermedia (Dalí, 1881), Inella ibex (Dalí, 1881), Inella torticula (Dalí,
1881), Inella colon (Dalí, 1881), Inella compsa (Dalí, 1927), Inella enopla (Dalí, 1927),
Inella meteoro (Dalí, 1927), Inella pompona (Dalí, 1927), Inella dinea (Dalí, 1927), Inella
sentoma (Dalí, 1927), Inella gaesona (Dalí, 1927), "Triphora" cylindrella (Dalí, 1927),
"Triphora" abrupta (Dalí, 1881), "Triphora" caracca Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" georgiana
Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" indígena Dalí, 1927, "Triphora" ¡Hacina (Dalí, 1889), "Triphora"
pyrrha Henderson y Bartsch, 1914 y también de la especie atlántica Triphora aspera Jef-
freys, 1885.
Al final se aporta una lista de los nombres empleados para las especies de Triphoridae
del Caribe, señalando los errores habidos y las sinonimias.
KEY WORDS: Triphoridae, Caribbean, new species.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Triphoridae, Caribbean, new species.
INTRODUCTION
Triphoridae J. E. Gray, 1847 is a very
diverse family of marine gastropods
that occurs world-wide, with about 600
ñames proposed for the Recent species
(Marshall, 1983). Triphorids live on
rocky substrates from the intertidal
fringe to a depth of more than 1000 m. A
complete general information on the
family Triphoridae is given by Mar-
shall (1983) and Wells (1998), who
noted that it is a highly species-rich
group, most species being sinistral, with
a high spire, numerous whorls, a short
to long anterior canal and a posterior
apertural notch or canal. The teleoconch
sculpture of triphorids is notably vari-
able, and can be beaded, spinose or
reticulate, and the shells are small
(usually less than 10 mm, although
some can be up to 40 mm or more).
Marshall (1983), in his revisión of the
Indo-Pacific species, emphasized the
importance of the shape and sculpture
of the protoconch for taxonomy, and
pointed out that "under absolutely no
circumstances should further new
species be proposed unless a complete,
unworn protoconch can be illustrated".
The family has its máximum diver-
sity in the tropical Indo-Pacific where,
according to Marshall (1983), there are
more than 1000 species. An impression
of the wealth of species in this area is
afforded by the 174 species found
during an extensive sampling in the
coral reef lagoon of Koumac, New Cale-
donia (Bouchet et al., 2002), Triphori-
dae being the second richest family of
molluscs, after Turridae.
Although notably less diverse than in
the Indo-Pacific, this family contains
many species in the Atlantic Ocean,
poorly known in most areas. Bouchet
and Guillemot (1978) and Bouchet
(1985, 1997) revised the species of this
family occurring in the Mediterranean
and neighbouring Atlantic, where
CLEMAM data base recognised 19
species in 10 genera. Some additional
species were described by Fernándes
and Rolán (1988, 1993) and Van der
Linden (1998) in the Cape Verde Islands,
82
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
and Rolán and Peñas (2001) from the
Canary Is. and the Mediterranean.
Information on triphorids from
many Caribbean areas is contained in a
number of works, such as those for
Jamaica (C. B. Adams, 1850a, 1850b,
most species represented in Clench
and Turner, 1950), Virgin Islands
(Nowell-Usticke, 1959 and 1971),
Yucatán Península, México (Vokes and
Vokes, 1983), Puerto Rico and nearby
Caribbean areas (Warmke and Abbott,
1961), Curasao, Aruba and Bonaire (De
Jong and Coomans, 1988), Oceanic
Islands off Brazil (Leal, 1991), Colom-
bian Caribbean (Díaz Merlano and
Puyana Hegedus, 1994), the Atlantic
and Gulf coasts and West Indies
(Morris, 1973), and Brazil (Ríos, 1994).
Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (1993a,
1993b, 1994 and 1995) and Rolán and
Espinosa (1994) showed the known
species from Cuba and described some
new species. Besides, other authors
described new species from other
Caribbean areas, such as De Jong and
Coomans (1988), Moolenbeek and
Faber (1989), Faber and Moolenbeek
(1991), Rolán and Crúz-Ábrego (1996)
and Rolán and Luque (1999). More
recently a large new species has been
described from Brazil (Simone, 2006).
Many other species were recorded from
deep water, and described by Watson
(1880, 1886), Dall (1881, 1889, 1927) and
other authors.
Fossil species were mentioned in
Olsson and Harbison (1953).
Colour photographs of 33 species,
including most of the known shallow-
water species and those described
during the last 20 years in previously
mentioned papers, are provided in a
recent paper (Rolán and Fernández-
Garcés, 2007) together with a list of
ñames assigned to the Caribbean
Triphoridae.
Henee, the present work has the fol-
lowing objectives: 1- To give available
information on the deeper water
species, showing the type material
whenever possible; 2- To provide addi-
tional colour photographs of the
Caribbean species which were not
figured in our previous work (Rolán
and Fernández-Garcés, 2007); 3- To
supply additional information that has
recently been obtained on other species
already known from shallow water; 4-
To describe some new species which
have been collected from shallow water;
5- To present an updated list of all the
taxa mentioned for the Caribbean and
nearby areas, making corrections to our
previous list.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Some of the species presented here
are only known from the type material,
loaned by several museums (mentioned
in Abbreviations and Acknowledge-
ments), or viewed on photographs, pro-
vided by their Curators or other person-
nel. In the collected material, the collec-
tor ñame and the data of collection were
referred when both were known.
Besides, material loaned by Harry G.
Lee from his collection, mainly from
deep water, is included in this study.
Finally, a few species were collected by
the authors and persons who have
cooperated with them. Most of the early
described species, some of which had
never been figured previously or had
only been represented by drawings, are
photographed here in colour, and when-
ever possible these figures inelude the
types and also illustrate intraspecific
variability. Some photos taken by Sally
Diana Kaicher (found in ANSP) were
included.
The order of presentation is basically
a grouping based on similarity. It was
also the authors' intention to inelude
most of the available information on
protoconchs, radulae and opercula, but
unfortunately this was only possible
with a few species. Most of the type
material excluded this possibility, and
much of the studied material consisted
of shells without soft parts. An attempt
has been made also to solve taxonomic
problems relevant to some of the
studied taxa.
None of Dall's descriptions included
a designated holotype, although some
83
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
seem to have been based on a single
shell. Under these circumstances, Dall's
material placed in some museums must
be considered as syntypes. After exami-
nation of available material from these
museums, it was therefore decided to
designate as lectotypes the shells that
were closest to the original description
or the original figure (shown in Dall,
1889).
In the description of shells, the spiral
beaded cords are frequently referred to
as "spiral 1, 2, 3 etc.", spiral 1 being the
subsutural cord on the adapical part of
the whorl, with subsequent cords on the
teleoconch whorls referred to as spirals
2 and 3, folio wing Marshall (1983).
Other important characters in the
description are, those of the protoconch,
such as the diameter, the shape and size
of the nucleus (elevated, depressed,
large, small, ...), the number of spiral
cords (none, 1 or 2), and the presence or
absence of axial ribs. We have followed
the method of Verduin (1976) for count-
ing the number of whorls of the proto-
conch. On the teleoconch, the number
and size of the spiral cords is noted on
the first and last whorls, where they are
frequently different. Also noteworthy is
the position of spiral 2 (closer to spiral 1,
equidistant between spirals 1 and 3) and
its size (nodules smaller, elongate, etc.).
It is important to point out that the
nodules, which are formed by the inter-
section of spirals and axial ribs, are
sometimes simply spherical, while other
times they are concave above and
convex below; in this case they are
crossed by a line that represents the
spiral cord and appears to cut the
nodule: these are referred to as cut
nodules or nodules that are cut in the
middle.
Due to the fact that the radula of
most species was unavailable, and as
this character is very important for
generic assignment, it was necessary in
many cases to employ generic ñames
very much in a sensu lato as "Triphora"
or "Inella". For generic arrangement we
mainly follow the works of Laseron
(1958), Marshall (1983) and Bouchet
(1985).
Abbreviations:
AMNH: American Museum of Natural
History, New York
ANSP: Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia
BMSM: Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum,
Sanibel Is., Florida
FLMNH: Florida Museum of Natural
History, Gainesville, Florida
IES: Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática,
La Habana
MCZ: Museum of Comparative
Zoology, Cambridge
MHNS: Museo de Historia Natural,
Santiago de Compostela
MNCN: Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
USNM: United States National
Museum, Washington
CCR: collection of Colin Redfern
CHL: collection of Harry G. Lee
CFG: collection of Raúl Fernández-
Garcés
CMK: collection of Mario Krisberg
sp: specimen with soft parts
s: shell
j: juvenile
f: fragment
RESULTS
I. Taxonomic part
Family Triphoridae Gray, 1847
Subfamily Metaxiinae Marshall, 1977
Genus Metaxia Monterosato, 1884
Type species: Cerithium rugulosum C. B. Adams, 1850. According to Marshall (1983), this sub-
family is formed by dextral triphorids.
84
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Metaxia propinqua spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 1C-H)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 1C, ID) in FLMNH (154988). Paratypes: 4 s, Louisiana, 27.98568°
N 92.6472° W, 65-91 m (FLMNH UF 291348); 5 s, Hillsborough Co., SW Egmont Key, Florida 73-91
m (collector Steger) (FLMNH 238632); 2 s (Figs. 1E, 1F), Palm Beach Co., Florida, off Boynton Inlet,
84-106 m (M. Glockstein, 1980) (FLMNH 47382).
Other material examined: 2 s (with broken protoconch), Louisiana, 27.98568° N, 92.6472° W, 65-
91 m (FLMNH UF 291348); 4 s (protoconch lost or eroded), Hillsborough Co., SW Egmont Key,
Florida 73-91 m (Steger) (FLMNH 238632); 1 s (protoconch eroded), 2 miles off Virginia Key, Florida,
9 m (FLMNH UF 365086); 1 s (protoconch eroded) (FLMNH).
Type locality: Florida, Monroe Co, WNW Dry Tortugas, 76 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latín word propinquus -a -um which means “cióse,
similar", alluding to the similarity with other species of this genus.
Description: Shell conical, very elon-
gate, relatively solid. Protoconch (Figs.
1G, 1H) white, paucispiral, with a little
more than two whorls and about 300 pm
in diameter; several spiral threads begin
at the apex. These are well defined, a
little irregular, four on the first whorl
decreasing to two on the second, where
numerous axial ribs run from the suture
to the upper thread. The teleoconch can
be white or light brown. Four spiral
cords are present from the beginning,
with the subsutural upper one less
prominent than the other three. Axial
ribs are present on the entire shell, about
10-11 on the first whorls and eighteen on
the final one. Suture depressed with a
very small spiral thread above. On the
base, the profile is slightly concave and
one additional cord is present. Aperture
almost round with an open and short
siphonal canal.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
6.3 mm.
Distribution : Known from Florida
and Louisiana, USA.
Remarks: In order to facilítate com-
parison of the protoconchs of the Metaxia
species mentioned here, they have all
been presented together in Figure 3.
M. rugulosa has a protoconch (Figs. 3A-
3D) with 2 1/i whorls (see Rolán and
Redfern, 1996), sometimes reaching three
whorls, with a spiral sculpture on the first
whorl formed by undulating or zigzag-
ging lines; the second protoconch whorl
has axial ribs which termínate at a single
spiral thread (only exceptionally double);
the teleoconch is white. M. excelsa and M.
taeniolata have multispiral protoconchs.
Metaxia propria spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 2A-C)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 2A, 2B) in FLMNH (UF 393603).
Type locality: Florida, Key Largo, 228 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latín word proprius -a -um which means “special,
characteristic", alluding to the differential characters of the protoconch that distinguish it from
other species of this genus.
Description : Shell conical, very elon-
gate, relatively solid. Protoconch white
(Fig. 2C) with a little more than 2 3A
whorls and about 400 pm in diameter;
two well defined spiral cords are crossed
by 13-15 axial ribs per whorl which are
continuous with those of the subsequent
whorl. Teleoconch white. Four spiral
cords are present from the beginning, the
subsutural upper one being less promi-
nent than the other three. Axial ribs
present on the entire shell, with about 10-
11 on the first whorls and 13 on the final
one. Suture depressed with a very small
spiral thread above. On the base, the
profile is slightly concave and one addi-
tional cord is present. Aperture almost
round, with an open siphonal canal.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
5.9 mm.
85
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Distribution : Only known from
Florida.
Remarks : Characters of the proto-
conch provide the main differences
between this species and those previ-
ously known:
M. rugulosa has a protoconch (Figs.
3A-3D) with 2 l/i whorls, sometimes
reaching 3, with a spiral sculpture on
the first whorl formed by undulating or
zigzagging lines; the second protoconch
whorl has axial ribs which terminate at
a single spiral thread (only exception-
ally double).
M. propincua spec. nov. lacks axial
ribs on the first whorl, and they reach
only to the upper spiral cord on the
second whorl.
Metaxia prompta spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 2D-J)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 2D, 2E) and 2 paratypes (Figs. 2G, 21) (FLMNH UF 359136).
Type locality: Bermuda, Hamilton Parish, Shelly Bay.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latin word promptus -a -um which means
"evident, available", alluding to the characters of the protoconch that are different from other
species of this genus.
Description : Shell conical, very elon-
gate, relatively solid. Protoconch (Figs.
2F, 2H, 2J) white, paucispiral with about
2 V2 whorls and between 300 and 400
pm in diameter; a single spiral cord is
poorly defined on the first whorl and a
little stronger on the second. The axial
ribs are numerous but not continuous;
they descend from the upper suture and
almost disappear just before reaching the
spiral cord, reappearing and strengthen-
ing on the cord before fading again
towards the lower suture. Teleoconch
white or light brown. Four spiral cords
are present from the beginning, the sub-
sutural upper one being less prominent
than the other three. Axial ribs are
present on the entire shell, varying in
number on the early whorls and increas-
ing to about 18 on the final one. Suture
depressed with a very small spiral
thread above. On the base, the profile is
slightly concave. Aperture almost round
with an open siphonal canal.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
4.1 mm.
Distribution : Only known from
Bermuda Archipelago.
Remarks : Characters of the proto-
conch easily differentiate this species
from related ones:
M. rugulosa has more rounded
whorls with zigzagging spiral lines on
the first whorl and numerous axial ribs
on the second, which only reach the
middle of the whorl.
M. espinosai has more angulate,
wider whorls, with prominent elongate
nodules and is always milky white.
M. propincua has rounded whorls,
with straight spiral cords beginning at
the apex and two cords on the second
whorl, with axial ribs absent from the
lower half of the whorl.
M. propria has almost three whorls,
rounded with two spiral cords and with
a few widely separated and prominent
axial ribs on the first whorls.
Metaxia sp. 1 (Figs. 1A-B)
Material examined: 1 s. Barbados, 183 m (USNM, labeled "Cerithiopsis abrupta Watson, 1880").
Remarks : The shell from Barbados
in USNM (without any type label) has
a paucispiral protoconch of 450 pm in
diameter, differing from M. abrupta
(Watson, 1880), which has a proto-
conch that is more depressed and also
has axial ribs (figured in Bouchet,
1985).
Dimensions : The shell studied mea-
sures 5.0 mm.
86
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Bouchet (1985) was unable to
confirm the existence of M. abrupta in the
western Atlantic. Probably this species is
endemic to the Azores Archipelago. The
species studied here could be the one
referred to by Dall (1889) as Cerithiopsis
abruptus (Fig. 36L), but we are not sure.
This species is different from the
other two Caribbean species with pau-
cispiral protoconch: M. espinosai
(described by Rolán and Fernández-
Garcés, 1993a) has a paucispiral proto-
conch (Fig. 3E) with a prominent nodu-
lous keeled border; and M. rugulosa (C.
B. Adams, 1850), which has a narrower
protoconch (Figs. 3A-3D) with a differ-
ent sculpture (Rolán and Redfern,
1996). However, it must be pointed out
here that the protoconch of the taxon M.
rugulosa is not known, as the apex is
missing from the holotype of this
species, represented in Clench and
Turner (1950). Another fragment in
BMNH with the label "figured speci-
men" had no protoconch.
In several works it has been
assumed that the protoconchs from
Cuba and the Bahamas figured in
Rolán and Redfern (1996) represent
the protoconchs of M. rugulosa , probably
due to the proximity of Cuba to Jamaica,
which is the type locality. Similar proto-
conchs were figured in Redfern (2001).
The other two known species of
Caribbean Metaxia ( M . excelsa and M.
taeniolata) have multispiral protoconchs.
The present species is probably
unknown and unnamed, but as only one
shell has been examined, and its proto-
conch is not in very good condition, it is
kept unnamed pending the availability
of more material in the future.
Subfamily Triphorinae Gray, 1847
Genus Monophorus Granata-Grillo, 1877
Type species (by monotypy): Trochus perversus Linnaeus, 1758. Recent, Mediterranean.
Remarks: The main characters (shown
in Marshall, 1983, Bouchet, 1985 and
Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1994)
are the following: multispiral protoconch,
teleoconch whorls flat-sided or shallowly
convex, well defined spiral cords and axial
ribs, nodular intersections and a typical
radula with central tooth with 3-5 cusps,
lateral with 5-6 and numerous margináis
with only 2-3 short cusps.
Monophorus olivaceus (Dall, 1889) (Figs. 4B-F, 4F4-K)
Triforis decorata var. olivácea Dall, 1889. Bull. M. C. Z., 18: 243. [Type locality: Gulf of México, west
of Florida, 91 m, Key West, Hemphill].
Triphora ornata auct. non Deshayes (1832).
Type material: One syntype, fragment of 10 mm, here designated as lectotype (Figs. 4C, 4D) (MCZ
7379).
Other material examined: México: 1 s, Cancun, Quintana Roo (Heilman, March, 1963) (ANSP
285517). Florida: 3 s, WSW of John's Pass, 50 m (Steger, 1956) (ANSP 306254); 1 s, Palm Beach Co.,
Bath and Tennis (McGinty coll/ Apr. 1951), 36-55 m (FLMNH 176649); 4 s, Collier Co., SW of Naples,
26 20' N (Powlus/Aug., 1960), 55 m (FLMNH 158202); 9 s, Palm Beach Co., off Palm Beach, 100 m
(FLMNH 154886); 3 s, Palm Beach, WOE Radio Towers to Bath and Tennis (McGinty, May/1951)
36-55 m (FLMNH 250132); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., (R/V Tritón, Apr. 1950) 40-50 m (FLMNH 204877);
1 s, off Marathón (M. and S. Snyder, Jul. 1966) (ANSP 309744). Bahamas: 1 s, reef NE of North Point,
Elbow (Little Guana) Cay, Abaco (Robertson, Aug. 1955) (ANSP 298409); 4 s, Grand Bahama Island,
26° 31' 00" N, 78° 46' 30" W (J.N. Worsfold) (ANSP 373939); 1 s, Grand Bahama Island, 26° 29' 45"
N, 78° 37' 15" W (G. Taylor and D. Nilsen) (ANSP 273605); 2 s, Tamarind, Grand Bahama Island
26° 30' 45" N, 78° 36' 00" W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 368896); 1 s, Bootle Bay, Grand Bahama Island 26°
87
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Figure 1. A, B. Metaxia sp. 1. A: shell, 5 mm, Barbados, 183 m (USNM); B: protoconch. C-H.
Metaxia propinqua spec. nov. C, D: holotype, 6.3 mm (FLMNH); E, F: paratype, 3.4 mm
(FLMNH); G: protoconch of the paratype; H: detail of the protoconch of the holotype.
Figura 1. A, B. Metaxia sp. 1. A: concha , 5 mm, Barbados, 183 m (USNM); B: protoconcha. C-H.
Metaxia propinqua spec. nov. C, D: holotipo, 6,3 mm (FLMNH); E, F: paratipo, 3,4 mm (FLMNH);
G: protoconcha del paratipo; H: detalle de la protoconcha del holotipo.
88
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 2. A-C. Metaxia propria spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 5.9 mm (FLMNH); C: protoconch of
the holotype. D-J. Metaxia prompta spec. nov. D, E: holotype, 4.1 mm (FLMNH); F, G: proto-
conch and shell of paratype, 3.3 mm (FLMNH); H, I: protoconch and shell of paratype, 4.0 mm
(FLMNH); J: protoconch of holotype.
Figura 2. A-C. Metaxia propria spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 5,9 mm (FLMNH); C: protoconcha del
holotipo. D-J. Metaxia prompta spec. nov. D, E: holotipo, 4,1 mm (FLMNH); F, G: protoconcha y
concha de un paratipo, 3,3 mm (FLMNH); H, I: protoconcha y concha de un paratipo, 4,0 mm
(FLMNH); J: protoconcha del holotipo.
89
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
39' 30" N, 78° 57' 00" W (J. Worsfold) 80 m (ANSP 371846); 1 s, Schooner Cays, NW of Powell Point,
Eleuthera 24° 56' 45" N 76° 25' 00" (R. Robertson) (ANSP 363405); 3 s (G. Buchanan) (BMNH
90.11.24.428-34). Venezuela: 4 s, distrito Federal (Berthier, 1935) (ANSP 264204). Grenada: 1 s, mouth
of St. George Harbour (Ostheimer, Jan. 1964) 44-66 m (ANSP 297306). Virgin Islands: 3 s, St. Croix
(R.E. Griffith) (ANSP 18201). Dutch Antilles: 5 s, (Gray coll.) Saint Vincent (BMNH). No exact local-
ity: 3 s (McAndrew coll.) (BMNH Acc n° 1563); 2 s (R. Sykes coll.) (BMNH acc. n° 1825).
Description : See Dall (1889). It is
important to point out some characters:
the large size of the beads, spiral 2 being
absent from the early whorls and
smaller on most of the shell, the colour
forming blotches, predominantly on
spirals 1 and 2. Spiral 3 is white, but the
cord between the beads is usually dark.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
10 mm.
Distribution: Known throughout the
Caribbean.
Remarks: There is considerable con-
fusión regarding this taxon: the species
was referred to as Triphora ornata by
many authors (Warmke and Abbott,
1961; Morris, 1973; Ríos, 1994) until
Moolenbeek and Faber (1991) showed
the correct ñame to be M. olivaceus (Dall,
1889). The type material of Triphora
ornata was examined by Faber (pers.
comm.) in 1983 from MNHN (Ecole des
Mines collection where the Deshayes
types should have been). This lot con-
sists of several poor shells, none of
which matches the Caribbean species,
and one of them in better condition cor-
responds to a Red Sea species.
The only known type specimen of
Triforis decor ata var. olivácea is an atypical
and faded shell. It can be confused with
some species with axial colour blotches:
Latitriphora albida (Fig. 4A) has very
characteristic smaller nodules, and no
confusión is possible; Nototriphora deco-
rata may be more similar and requires
careful comparison. We have compared
a typical shell of Nototriphora decorata
(Fig. 4G) with representative shells of
M. olivaceus (Figs. 4D-F) and with the
lectotype of the latter species (Figs. 4B,
C). It can be seen that the early whorls
of N. decorata are narrower than those of
the type of M. olivaceus and have smaller
nodules, whereas the early whorls of
representative M. olivaceus are very
similar to those of the type specimen. As
it is necessary for nomenclatural stabil-
ity to designate a lectotype, we propose
as such the only known syntype.
The species M. olivaceus is very vari-
able, with large, wide shells sometimes
found in the same population as small,
narro w ones. Also, the dark colour may
vary from almost black to light brown
and can be variably distributed, but it is
always present on spiral 1 and on a few
nodules of spiral 2.
Examination of a shell from Florida
(Figs. 4H-4J) revealed a dark subsutural
spiral and a dark base. It appeared
slightly different from average examples
of M. olivaceus (like Fig. 4K), as the
colour is not only darker but is also
slightly differently distributed; spiral 1
has only isolated white beads and the
brown color does not form blotches,
spiral 2 is mostly white and spiral 3 is
totally white, without any brown colour
between the beads. Also the beads on
spiral 2 become comparatively larger
several whorls before the final whorl.
However, it is considered to be only a
variety.
Genus Isotriphora Cotton and Godfrey, 1931
Type species (by original description) Triforis tasmanica T. Wood, 1875. Recent, South Australia,
Tasmania.
Description : The most important cióse to that of the genus Eutriphora
character of this genus is the paucispiral Cotton and Godfrey, 1931, but the latter
protoconch with nodular spiral cords, has axial riblets. Operculum multispiral.
90
RoláN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 3. Protoconchs of Metaxia species. A-D. M. rugulosa (C. B. Adams, 1830) from Cuba (A)
and Bahamas (B-D). E. M. espinosai Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1993, Cuba.
Figura 3. Protoconchas de especies de Metaxia. A-D. M. rugulosa (C. B. Adams, 1850) de Cuba (A) y
Bahamas (B-D). E. M. espinosai Rolán y Fernández-Garcés, 1993, Cuba.
Isotriphora guanahacabibes spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs.
5A-H)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 5A) in MNCN (15.05/15.05/47054) and paratypes in the following
collections: MHNS, 2 s (Fig. 5B); IES, 1 s (Fig. 5C); CFG (3 s, 8 f), all from the type locality; 1 f and
1 j, from Cienfuegos, Cuba (MHNS); 1 s, outer slope of beach, W of Georgetown, Cayman Is. 100-
115 fms (Tyler, Oct. 1964) (ANSP 300623).
Other material examined: 2 f, Cienfuegos Bay, Cuba 40 m; 1 j, S shore of island, 3 miles E of South-
west Point, Cayman Brac Island (ANSP 397055).
Type locality: From sediment at Cueva de Pipo, Maria la Gorda, Guanahacabibes, Pinar del Río,
Cuba, at 35 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame comes from the type locality.
Description : Shell (Figs. 5A-5C)
whitish, cortical elongate, solid. Proto-
conch (Figs. 5D-5F) paucispiral with
about 300 pm in diameter, the number of
whorls not appreciable due to indetermi-
nate separation from the teleoconch.
The protoconch begins with a very
narrow nucleus and the following two
whorls have two prominent nodular
spirals, with another very small one below
the suture. Teleoconch with about 10
whorls and with a straight profile; each
91
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
whorl with two widely separated nodu-
lous spiral cords (spirals 1 and 3), the
lower one more prominent; about the 6-
7^ whorls, a small cord (spiral 2) appears
closer to spiral 1 (Fig. 5G). Spiral 2 con-
tinúes onto the subsequent whorls, becom-
ing narrow, undulating and slightly nodu-
lous towards the end. Spiral 2 is always
smaller than spiral 1 and 3 and is closer
to the one above. On the last two whorls
an additional very small, smooth spiral 4
appears at the suture. The aperture is
ovoid, the outer lip fine and prominent.
Near the end of the final whorl there is a
small hole, located cióse to the apertural
border on the upper part of the whorl.
Siphonal canal closed, curving towards
the rear. The colour is totally white, but
some specimens can have small areas of
light brown (Fig. 5C). Under high magni-
fication spiral striae (Fig. 5H) can be seen
between the spirals.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
5.5 x 1.6 mm.
Distribution: Known from the type
locality and from the Cayman Islands,
down to 183-210 m.
Remarles: This species must be com-
pared with the other congeneric species
with a similar protoconch:
Isotriphora peetersae (Moolenbeek and
Faber, 1989) is dark brown, except for
the protoconch and first whorls of the
teleoconch, and the shell is more obese
and with fewer whorls. Furthermore,
the anal sinus is at the end of the spire
and is not closed.
Isotriphora taenialba Rolán and
Espinosa, 1994, is similar to I. peetersae
but a little larger, and always has dark
and lighter bands of colour; also the
anal sinus is open at the end of the spire.
At first sight it might be confused
with species of the genus Iniforis
Jousseaume, 1884 such as I. immaculata,
which is totally white, but that species
has a protoconch with only one smooth
fine cord.
Genus Eutriphora Cotton and Godfrey, 1931
Type species (o. d.): Triphora cana Verco, 1909, Recent, Australia.
Description: After Marshall (1983),
similar to the genus Isotriphora but with
multispiral protoconch with axial
riblets. Radula with the rachidian tooth
having three cusps, lateral teeth with 4-5
and numerous marginal teeth with an
elongate central cusp. Operculum pau-
cispiral.
Eutriphora auffenbergi spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 6A-I)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 6A-6B) in FLMNH. Paratypes: 1 s (Fig. 6C) (BMSM); 1 s (USNM);
1 s (CHL), all from type locality and ex CHL. Other paratypes: 3 s, 1 j, off Egmont Key, Hillsbor-
ough Co., Florida, 76 m (Jim Moore /Cavalier, 1962) (CHL); 1 j, 65 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns
Co., Florida (T. Yocius, Jun. 1972), 54 m (CHL); 1 j, 32 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida
(T. Yocius, Jun. 1981), 30 m (CHL); 4 s (Fig. 6D), Florida, (MCZ 356088); 1 s (Fig. 6E), Florida, 5 m
(MCZ 356096); 1 s, Hillsborough Co., W of Egmont Key, Florida, 274 m (FLMNH 169703); 1 sp,
Palm Beach Co., E of Palm Beach, Florida, 183-578 m (FLMNH 257207).
Other material examined (in bad condition): 1 s, 10 f, Pinellas Co., WSW John's Pass, Florida, (D.
Steger) 68 m (FLMNH 238662).
Type locality: West of Dry Tortugas, Monroe Co., Florida, USA (Jim Moore/ Cavalier, 1972), 90 m.
Etymology: The species is named after Kurt Auffenberg, former Collections Manager in Malacol-
ogy. Florida Museum of Natural History, USA.
Description : Shell (Figs. 6A-6E) spiral, with about 4 whorls, the surface
sharp-pointed, elongate, solid, brown or of the apex with small tubercles and the
light brown. Protoconch (Fig. 6G) multi- subsequent whorls with two small
92
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
spiral cords crossed by numerous fine
axial ribs that have a slight S-shaped
curve. Teleoconch with about 17-18
whorls in large specimens, beginning
with spirals 1 and 3, crossed by proso-
cline axial ribs which form small
nodules at the intersection points. On
whorls 4-5, spiral 2 appears cióse to
spiral 1; on the subsequent whorls, the
three spirals are similar in size but spiral
3 is a little more prominent. An addi-
tional spiral cord, appearing on about
whorls 10-12, is slightly nodulous,
always smaller, and is located just below
the suture (Fig. 6F). This cord is more
evident on the final whorl, where it
occurs near the periphery. Below it there
are two more smooth spiral cords, the
lower one on the base of the siphonal
canal (Fig. 6C). Aperture rounded, cól-
umella curved, siphonal canal elongate
and recurved, closed at its base by an
extensión of the aperture.
Dimensions: The holotype measures
21.8 mm, with 20 whorls. Other shells
are smaller.
Operculum (Fig. 6H): paucispiral,
subcircular, yellowish, rather transpar-
ent, with the nucleus subcentral.
Radula (Fig. 61): relatively large,
with a formula 16-1-1-1-16, the rachid-
ian tooth having three prominent cusps;
the lateral has 5 cusps of which cusps 2
and 4 are smaller. The marginal teeth
have a filiform central elongate cusp,
with the other two short and similar in
size.
Distribution : The species has been
found only in Florida.
Remarks: The generic assignment is
based on the similarity of the radula,
operculum and protoconch to the type
species of the genus Eutriphora : E. armil-
lata (Verco, 1909) from Australia (see
Marshall, 1983).
The holotype of E. auffenbergi spec.
nov. resembles the figure of T. triserialis
in Dall (1889: pl. 20, fig. 6a) (Fig. 36E),
but the following characters of the
present species are not coincident: the
shell is brown and the protoconch also is
darker, typically with 4 whorls and with
tubercles on the apex; the siphonal canal
is elongate. All these characters are dis-
similar from DalTs species (see below).
Comparison and differentiation
must be made with the following
Caribbean species described here:
"Triphora" abrupta has a shorter shell,
with the nodules less spherical, spiral 1
is very small and cióse to the suture,
almost similar to spiral 4, while in T. auf-
fenbergi spiral 1 is similar to the other
main two.
"T. " georgiana has a very small spiral
1 which remains reduced on the final
whorls, and the protoconch probably
has fewer whorls.
"T. " caracca has two main spirals and
between them a very narrow spiral 2;
the axial ribs are very prosocline.
"T. " indígena has a more convex
profile to the whorls; the spiral cords are
wider and the nodules at the intersec-
tion points are very small, resulting in
rectangular pits in the interspaces
between cords and ribs.
E. auffenbergi is somewhat similar to
Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán and Fer-
nández-Garcés, 1995) (see below), but
the latter species is shorter (usually with
no more than 9 teleoconch whorls), and
the siphonal canal is also very short and
curved.
Other brown species are Marshallora
nigrocincta (C. B. Adams, 1839) and M.
modesta (C. B. Adams, 1850), but these
species have a shorter spire (not more
than 10 whorls), a more convex profile
and a very short siphonal canal.
Genus Marshallora Bouchet, 1985
Type species: Murex adversus Montagu, 1803 (o.d.).
Diagnosis: After Bouchet (1985),
protoconch of 4-5 whorls with two
spiral threads, granules on its apical
part, teleoconch with the second cord
appearing later, operculum paucispiral
and radula with central and lateral teeth
93
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
with two groups of cusps. Caribbean Garcés (1995) and Rolán and Crúz-
species in Rolán and Fernández- Ábrego (1996).
Marshallora ostenta spec. nov. Rolán and Femández-Garcés (Figs. 7A-N, 8E, 8F)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 7A, 7B) in MNCN (15.05/47055) and a paratype (Fig. 7C) in IES,
both from type locality. Other paratypes in the following institutions: 1 s (Fig. 7E), off Mayport,
Duval Co., Florida (Yergin, Jan. 99), 30 m (FLMNH, ex CHL); 2 s (Figs. 7F, 7G), off Big Pine Key,
Monroe Co., Florida, 30-50 m, (K. Sunderland, Aug/91) (BMSC ex CHL); 1 s, off Big Pine Key,
Monroe Co., Florida, 30-50 m (K. Sunderland, 1991) (CHL, Fig. 71); 3 s, off Egmont Key, Hillsbor-
ough Co., Florida (J. Moore/ Cavalier , 1962), 72 m (CHL); 1 s (Fig. 7H), 32 miles E. St. Augustine, St.
Johns Co., Florida (T. Yocius, 1972) 30 m (USNM ex CHL); 8 s, Palm Beach Co., Florida, off Boynton
Inlet (D. and H. Akers, Dec. 1969) 33 m (FLMNH 177040); 1 s (Fig. 7J) Miami, Florida, 73 m (FLMNH
UF363887); 1 s (Fig. 7K), Palm Beach Co., Florida, off Dodge Estate (R/V Tritón, Dec. 1951) (McGinty
coll.) (FLMNH 178201).
Other material examined: Cuba: 2 sp (Fig. 7D)(destroyed for radular study), Cienfuegos (MHNS).
USA: Florida: 1 sp (destroyed for radular study) and 2 s. Anclote Key, near Tarpon Springs, Pasco
Co. (CHL); 1 s, off Dry Tortugas, Monroe Co., Riley Black (ex J. Dawley, 1/4/1983), 55 m (CHL)
(the last two lots not in good condition); 4 s, off Destin, 25 m (ANSP 252157); 1 s, Palm Beach Co.,
off Yamato Rocks, (F. B. Lyman/ Apr. 1939) 11 m (FLMNH 10242); 3 s, St. Augustine (FLMNH
286017).
Type locality: Cienfuegos Bay, Cuba.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latín past participle ostentus -a, -um which
means "shown", indicating that the review of material from several collections allowed us to rec-
ognize this species.
Description : Shell (Figs. 7A-7K) light,
solid, conical elongate. Protoconch (Figs.
8E, 8F) dark brown, multispiral, with
between 3 l/i and 4 whorls; the apex is
covered by small tubercles; fine axial
ribs are crossed by two spiral cords on
the lower whorls and sometimes by a
single cord on the first whorl. Teleo-
conch with 7-10 whorls, the first 4-5
with only two beaded cords (spirals 1
and 3); spiral 2 appears between them
on about the fifth or sixth whorl,
increasing in size until the three spirals
are the same size on the final whorl.
Another very small, smooth spiral
occurs at the suture. The colour is
usually white at the beginning of the
teleoconch, sometimes including the
first 1-2 whorls; subsequently the colour
of the shell is more variable: frequently
uniform cream or light brown, darker at
the suture; the beaded cords may be dif-
ferent, whitish, cream or light brown,
and either the lower or upper cord can
be lighter. Aperture rounded; base
brown, sometimes only light brown, the
darker colour extending to the col-
umella; siphonal canal short and open.
Dimensions: The holotype measures
4.2 mm; some paratypes reach 5.5 mm.
The soft parts (examined in only two
specimens) are whitish, slightly translu-
cent, with milk-white spots on the head
and a few on the tentacles.
Operculum (Fig. 7N) rounded-
ovoid, multispiral, with the nucleus
somewhat deviated from the centre.
Radula (Figs. 7L, 7M) studied in one
specimen from Cuba and another from
Florida, has a formula n-l-l-l-n. The
rachidian tooth has two parts with 5-6
sharp cusps at each side; the lateral ones
are very similar to the central one; the
marginal ones are sharp pointed, very
elongate and narrow.
Distribution: Known from Cuba and
Florida.
Remarks : In spite of the amount of
material examined, it was not possible to
arrive at a description that represented
all the shells, suggesting that this must
be a variable species. There are some dif-
ferences in the protoconch (number of
whorls, one or two spiral threads on the
first whorl), but the main differences
concern the very variable colour distrib-
94
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 4. A. Latitriphora albida (A. Adams, 1854) (BMNH). B, C. Monophorus olivaceus (Dalí,
1889), lectotype, 10 mm (USNM). D-F. M. olivaceus typical shells from Cuba, all for comparison
with the shell of the lectotype. G. Nototriphora decorata (C. B. Adams, 1850), Cuba. H-K.
Monophorus olivaceus (Dalí, 1889). H-J: shell, 7.0 mm, Peanut Island, Florida (MHNS); K: shell,
8 mm, Florida (FLMNH).
Figura 4. A. Latitriphora albida (A. Adams, 1854) (BMNH). B, C. Monophorus olivaceus (Dalí,
1889), lectotipo, 10 mm (USNM); D-F. M. olivaceus, conchas típicas de Cuba, todas para compara-
ción con la concha del lectotipo. G. Nototriphora decorata (C. B. Adams, 1850), Cuba. H-K.
Monophorus olivaceus (Dalí, 1889). H-J: concha, 7,0 mm, Peanut Island, Florida (MHNS); K:
concha, 8 mm, Florida (FLMNH).
95
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
ution on the teleoconch and the initial
appearance of spiral 2 between the 5th
and 7th teleoconch whorls. All of this
suggested to us that more than one
species might be involved in the studied
material. Anyway, some shells with clear
differences ha ve been separated from the
initial lot, and these are described below
(the following species). The remainder
were considered to represent a single
variable species, which future study of
live collected material may confirm
through observation of the colour of the
soft parts and examination of radulae.
Similiphora intermedia (C. B. Adams,
1850) always has the spiral cords white
and brown, with a rather uniform color
pattern of a darker upper cord and a
dark or light brown middle one; the soft
parts are black. The radula has numer-
ous teeth all similar in size.
Marshallora modesta (C. B. Adams,
1850) and M. nigrocincta (C. B. Adams,
1839) have similar shells but they are
darker brown and never whitish. The
protoconchs are somewhat different,
being wider and shorter (as can be seen
in Figures 8H and 81).
Marshallora apexdiversus spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 8A-D, 8G)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 8A) and 3 s (Figs. 8B, 8C), paratypes (FLMNH UF363887) from type
locality; 1 s, 1 s (Fig. 8D), Palm Beach Co., Florida, off Dodge Estate (R/V Tritón, Dec. 1951) (McGinty
coll.) (FLMNH 178201).
Type locality: Miami, Florida, 73 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latin words diversus, which means "different", and
apex, referring to an important character for separation from other cióse species.
Description : Shell (Figs. 8A-8D) light,
solid, conical elongate. Protoconch (Fig.
8G) light brown, with 5 whorls; the apex
is covered by small tubercles and is very
narrow; the whorls with fine axial ribs that
are crossed by two spiral cords, the upper
cord almost in the middle of the whorl
and the lower one closer to the suture be-
low. Teleoconch with 8-11 whorls, the first
2-3 with only two beaded cords (spirals 1
and 3); spiral 2 appears between them on
about the fourth whorl, increasing in size
until the three cords are of equal size on
about the fifth or sixth whorls. Another
very small, smooth spiral occurs at the su-
ture on the final whorls. The colour is usu-
ally white on the first 2 whorls of the
teleoconch; on subsequent whorls spiral
1 is light brown, and on some shells (but
not on the holotype)this colour also reach-
es the suture. The nodules are always
lighter than the ground colour. Aperture
rounded-ovoid; base cream, siphonal
canal short and closed at the aperture by
an extensión of the outer lip.
Dimensions: The holotype measures
6.2 mm.
Distribution : Only known from
Florida.
Remarks : The present species is tenta-
tively included in Marshallora due to sim-
ilarity with the other Caribbean species in
this genus. At the beginning of this study
the shells included in this taxon were
placed in the variable M. ostenta spec. nov.
Finally, both species were considered dif-
ferent on the basis of the following char-
acters: M. ostenta almost always has a dark
brown base, the protoconch has fewer
whorls (see Figs. 8E, 8F in comparison
with Fig. 8G), the apex is wider, the spiral
threads on the protoconch are in the
middle of the whorl; on the teleoconch,
spiral 2 never begins before the fifth whorl,
sometimes even later.
Similiphora intermedia (C. B. Adams,
1850) always has very dark colour on
spiral 1, while spiral 2 is light or dark
brown.
Marshallora modesta (C. B. Adams,
1850) and M. nigrocincta (C. B. Adams,
1839), have similar shells but in both
cases they are darker brown and never
whitish or cream. The protoconchs of
both species are rather different, being
wider at the apex and shorter (as can be
seen in Figures 8H and 81, in compari-
son with Fig. 8G).
96
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 5. Isotriphora guanahacabibes spec. nov. A: holotype, 5.5 mm (MNCN); B: paratype, 4.7
mm (MHNS); C: paratype, 4.35 mm (IES). D-F: protoconchs of paratypes (MHNS); G: detail of
the end of the last whorl, paratype in figure B; H: detail of the microsculpture.
Figura 5. Isotriphora guanahacabibes spec. nov. A: holotipo, 5,5 mm (MNCN); B: paratipo, 4,7 mm
(MHNS); C: paratipo, 4,55 mm (IES). D-F: protoconchas de paratipos (MHNS); G: detalle del final
de la última vuelta, paratipo de la Figura B; H: detalle de la microescultura.
Genus Inella Bayle, 1879
Ino Hinds, 1843, p. 17. Type species (subsequent designation of Jousseaume 1844: 230): Triforis
(Ino) gigas Hinds, 1843. Recent, New Guinea.
Inella Bayle, 1879, p. 35. New ñame for Ino Hinds (not Ino Samsuelle, 1817).
Remarks : The type species (see
Marshall, 1983) has a blunt and wide
protoconch with between two and
three whorls, each with two spiral
cords; the shells included in this genus
are elongate and usually have two
spiral beaded cords at the beginning of
the teleoconch (three exceptionally) and
three on the subsequent whorls,
frequently with a fourth cord
appearing at the suture. Marshall
(1983) mentioned that the limits of the
genus are uncertain, and the radula has
numerous small and similar teeth
except the rachidian, that has symmet-
rical cusps.
97
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Inella bigemma (Watson, 1880) (Figs. 9A-B, 36B)
Cerithium (Triforis) bigemma Watson, 1880. Prelim. Report., pt 5. Journ. Linnean Soc. London, 15:
101, sp. 2. [Type locality: 18° 38' 30" N, 65° 5' 30" W, Off Culebra Island, 713 m].
Type material: Syntype (BMNH 1887.2.9.1762) (Fig. 9A) here designated as lectotype.
Other material examined: 1 s (Fig. 9B), (BMNH 1915.12.31.199) from Irish Fishery Board.
Description : See Watson (1881, 1886).
The protoconch is unknown. Two spiral
cords are present on the first whorls,
subsequently with an additional
smaller, less prominent cord appearing
above them. About 17 whorls on the lec-
totype.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
13.5 mm.
Distribution : Only known with cer-
tainty from the lectotype. Culebra Island
(between Puerto Rico and Virgin
Islands).
Remarks: The shell mentioned in the
original description as having 0.6 inch
(=15 mm) and the original figure (Fig.
36B) are coincident in size and number
of whorls with the shell studied by us,
and probably it is the same.
The second shell studied (Fig. 9B) has
a different profile and could be a different
species (Bouchet and Warén, 1993 are
of the opinión that this shell is Strobiligera
brychiá). Without protoconchs it is not pos-
sible to make a correct comparison. This
species is very similar to I. torticula (see
below, in Remarks for that species).
This taxon is mentioned in Dall
(1981, 1989), who suggested that the
species Triforis torticula could be a
variety of T. bigemma. As the shells are
not in perfect condition and lack proto-
conchs, not enough information was
obtained to decide if they represent dif-
ferent species, but the whorls seem to
expand more slowly on the type of T.
torticula, although not on the other
shells studied.
Inella inflata (Watson, 1880) (Figs. 9C, 36G)
Cerithium (Triforis) inflatum Watson, 1880. Prelim. Report., pt 5. Journ. Linn. Soc., 15: 103. [Type
locality: 18° 38' 30" N, 65° 5' 30" W, St. Thomas, N of Culebra Island, Danish West Indies, 713
m; indicating: Habitat.- Yucatán Strait, 1170 m (Dalí).].
Triforis inflatum Watson: Dall, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 6.
Triforis (Sychar) inflata Watson: Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249.
Type material: Syntype (BMNH 1887.2.9.1766) (Fig. 9C) here designated as lectotype.
Description : See Watson (1881, 1886).
The protoconch is pupoid and perhaps
with about two whorls, the first one
wider than the second. It may be about
500 pm in diameter. The teleoconch is in
bad condition, but it is possible to see
the two main beaded spirals, and one
more near the suture. The nodules are
concave above and pointed.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
4.8 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks: No other syntype of this
species was found in other museums
and the shell is nearly identical to that
represented in the original figure of I.
Inflata (Fig. 36G), for which 13 whorls
are mentioned (really 12 including the
protoconch) and the correct size of 4.8
mm. Therefore, probably it could be the
only type specimen but, as no holotype
was mentioned in the original descrip-
tion, this shell is here designated as lec-
totype. Its protoconch is very different
from most others from the Caribbean
area, and is therefore a differential char-
acter.
Dall (1889) placed his species T. ibex
as a variety of I. inflata Watson. Both
98
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 6. Eutriphora aujfenbergi spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 21.8 mm, off Dry Tortugas, Florida
(FLMNH); C: paratype, 8.4 mm, same locality (BMSM); D: paratype, 13.7 mm, Fia., USA
(station 4)(MCZ 336088). E: paratype, 12.1 mm, 14 whorls, Fia., USA, 5.5 m (MCZ 356096).
F: detail of sculpture of the holotype; G: protoconch of the paratype in fig. C; H: operculum (of a
specimen from Palm Beach, Florida, 100-300 fms (FLMNH); I: radula (from the same specimen).
Figura 6. Eutriphora auffenbergi spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 21,8 mm, de fuera de Dry Tortugas,
Florida (FLMNH); C: paratipo, 8,4 mm, la misma localidad (BMSM); D: paratipo, 13,7 mm. Fia.,
USA (estación 4) (MCZ 356088). E: paratipo, 12,1 mm, 14 vueltas, Fia., USA, 5,5 m (MCZ
356096). F: detalle de la escultura del holotipo ; G: protoconcha del paratipo en la fig. C; H: opérculo
(de un ejemplar de Palm Beach, Florida, 100-300 brazas (FLMNH); I: rddula (del mismo ejemplar).
99
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
taxa do not appear to be similar: I. ibex
lacks a protoconch and the type, with 14
whorls, is 10.4 mm; the description of I.
inflata mentions 13 whorls and 4.8 mm,
but the shell is less mature than the type
specimens of I. ibex. Comparison of the
types shows a different sculpture, the
suture is deeper on I. ibex and the
sutural threads are less prominent.
It is more difficult to distinguish it
from other species of Inella and this
shall be done below.
Inella longissima (Dalí, 1881) (Figs. 10A-G, 36D)
Triforis (Ino) longissimus Dalí, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 80. [Type locality: Not stated].
Triforis (Inella) longissima Dalí, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 246, pl. 20, fig. 10. [Habitat:
Sigsbee knoll, off Havana, in 320-823 m].
Type material: One syntype, here designated as lectotype (Fig. 10A). Off Havana, Cuba 22° 9' N
82° 21' 30W, 175 m. Blake 1877-1878 Exped. Sta. 56 (MCZ 7381).
Other material studied: Bahamas: 1 f, Tamarind, Grand Bahama Island 26° 30' 45"N, 78° 36' 00"
W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 368279); Florida: 1 j (Fig. 10F) with protoconch, off Alligator Reef Light,
lower Florida Keys (J. Moore, 1965) (ANSP 312592); 1 s (Fig. 10B), 1 j, SW of Egmont Key, (D. Steger,
1966) 366-420 m (ANSP 306391); 1 s, Monroe Co., 205° off Sombrero Light, (McGinty, Jul. 1951),
335-367 m (FLMNH 249518).
Description: See Dall (1881). Shell
(Fig. 10A) elongate, solid, whitish. The
protoconch is not known from the syn-
type, but a juvenile (Fig. 10F), which
could be this species, shows a paucispi-
ral protoconch of about 400 pm, with a
pupoid apex and three whorls with two
spiral cords. On this juvenile, the begin-
ning of the teleoconch has only two spi-
rals, but after a few whorls the third
very small spiral appears between them.
The teleoconch in large shells can reach
up to 27 or more whorls (Fig. 10B). The
profile of the whorls is straight, with
four spirals: spirals 1 and 3 are almost
similar in size and between them is spi-
ral 2, which is initially slightly smaller
but is subsequently of similar size; very
cióse to the suture there is one more
smooth spiral cord (Fig. 10D). Spiral 3 is
a little more prominent than spirals 1-2.
The nodules are always rounded.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
26.7 mm.
A larger specimen, supposedly of
this species, has a more prominent
spiral 3 on the final whorls (Fig. 10B)
and the nodules are a little larger.
Distribution: Known from Bahamas,
Florida and Cuba.
Remarks: The syntypes with this
label from USNM and MCZ were exam-
ined. The problem is that the two lots
apparently represent two different
species. In this situation, after the
description of Dall (1881) was carefully
revised, it was decided to desígnate as
lectotype the syntype in MCZ, due to
the fact that the characters of this shell
more closely matched the original
description. In this description, the
author pointed out that: "all the shells
were decapitated" (which is not the case
in the USNM syntype), and he only
mentioned three spiral cords; further-
more, the shell designated as lectotype
has characters that are more similar to
those of the figure of I. longissima repre-
sented in Dall (1889: pl. 20, fig. 10)(Fig.
36D), and is cióse to 26 mm in size. The
syntype in USNM (with the label T.
longissimus ) has a size of 22 mm, differ-
ent to the dimensions mentioned by
Dall (1881), has a perfect protoconch
and has only two spirals on the first 6-7
whorls of the teleoconch; additionally, a
third and fourth cord appear, but these
differ from the figure in Dall (1889).
Also the siphonal canal is larger. For all
these differences it was considered to be
a sepárate species, and will be described
below as new ( I . pseudolongissima). The
shell from ANSP (Fig. 10B) may be the
same species, but spiral 2 is very small
100
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 7. Marshallora ostenta spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 4.2 mm, MNCN; C: paratype, 3.6 mm
(IES); D: shell, 3.9 mm, specimen destroyed for radular studies; all from Cienfuegos, Cuba; E:
paratype, 3.9 mm, off Mayport, Florida (FLMNH); F, G: paratypes, 3.3 and 5.4 mm, off Big Pine
Key, Florida (BMSM); H: paratype, 3.5 mm, off St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida (USNM); I:
paratype, 5.5 mm, off Big Pine Key (CHL); J: paratype, 5.5 mm, Florida (FLMNH); K: paratype,
5.3 mm, Florida (FLMNH); L: radula from a specimen from Cienfuegos; M: radula from a speci-
men from Florida; N: operculum, from Cienfuegos.
Figura 7. Marshallora ostenta spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 4,2 mm, MNCN; C: paratipo, 3,6 mm (IES);
D: concha, 3,9 mm, ejemplar destruido para estudios radulares; todos de Cienfuegos, Cuba; E: paratipo,
3,9 mm, fuera de Mayport, Florida (FLMNH); F, G: paratipos, 5,5 y 5,4 mm, fuera de Big Pine Key,
Florida (BMSM); H: paratipo, 3,5 mm, fuera de St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida (USNM); I:
paratipo, 5,5 mm, fuera de Big Pine Key (CHL); J: paratipo, 5,5 mm, Florida (FLMNH); K: paratipo,
5.3 mm. Florida (FLMNH); L: rádula de un ejemplar de Cienfuegos; M: radula de un ejemplar de
Florida; N: opérculo, de Cienfuegos.
101
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
from the first teleoconch whorls, and on
the final whorls spiral 3 is more promi-
nent than on the lectotype. However, as
these minor differences probably only
indícate some variation in the species,
the shell has been kept in this taxon.
In spite of there being no information
about the protoconch of the lectotype of
this species, it has been considered to be-
long to the genus Inella on the basis of the
protoconch present on a juvenile, which
probably represents the same species.
Inella pseudolongissima Rolán and Femández-Garcés spec. nov. (Figs. 11 A-H)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 11 A), a paratype (Fig. 11D) and a fragment (USNM 87316: syntypes
of Triforis longissimus ) from the type locality; 1 paratype (Fig. HE), 26° 40' N (M.E. Powlus, July
1960) (McGinty coll.) 77 m, (FLMNH 171183); 1 paratype (Fig. 11G), Hillsborough Co., Tampa,
Florida, West of Egmont Key (J. Moore, ]un. 1962) (McGinty coll.) 366 m (FLMNH 158180).
Type locality: Cuba, off Havana, 823 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the similarity with 1. longissima, with which this species
was confused.
Description : Shell (Figs. 11A, 11D, 11E,
IIG) very elongate, irregularly white or
creamish. Protoconch (Figs. 11B, 11F,
IIH) multispiral with nearly 4 whorls,
almost 1 mm in height and with a diam-
eter of about 500 pm, sculptured with 2
spiral cords that are more evident on the
last whorls; these two cords are unap-
parent or only insinuated on the first two
whorls. Teleoconch with between 18 and
24 whorls, the first whorls with two
beaded spiral cords (spirals 1 and 3), the
nodules being rounded; below, on
whorls 3-4, a small, very narrow cord
(spiral 2) appears between them; this
new cord is always smaller than the
other two and closer to the upper one;
spiral 3 subsequently increases in size
and is very clearly the largest on the last
4-5 whorls, the other two being smaller;
also an additional small, unbeaded cord
appears at the suture. Axial ribs are
almost not appreciable; the growth lines
are prosocline. Aperture rhomboid,
siphonal canal short and open.
The colour of the holotype is totally
white. Paratypes are cream with some
areas of light brown.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
22.0 mm.
Distribution : Known from Florida
and Cuba.
Remarles: I. pseudolongissima may be
distinguished from I. longissima by teleo-
conch sculpture, the latter species
having three cords of equal size on most
of the spire. Also spiral 2 appears on the
first whorls of I. pseudolongissima but on
about the seventh whorl in I. longissima.
The protoconch of I. longissima has three
whorls with two well defined cords,
while the protoconch of I. pseudolongis-
sima has four smooth whorls, and the
apex is smaller.
For differentiation from other cióse
species, see below.
Inella noduloides spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 12 A, B)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 12A, 12B) in ANSP (374588).
Type locality: Tamarind, Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas 26° 30' 45"N, 78° 36' 00" W, 500 m (J.
Worsfold, May, 1985).
Etymology: The ñame alludes to the prominent nodules of the whorls.
Description: Shell (Figs. 12A, 12B) small,
subcylindrical, elongate, whitish and solid.
Protoconch with a pupoid apex of about
380 pm diameter and 3 whorls, each with
two smooth spiral cords; the lower cord
becomes more prominent near the end,
where another smooth, less prominent
cord appears above the other two, very
102
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 8. A-D. Marshallora apexdiversus spec. nov. A: holotype, 6.2 mm, Florida (FLMNH); B-D:
paratypes, 6.9, 6.5, 4,6 mm, Florida (FLMNH). E-I. Protoconchs of Marshallora species. E, F: M.
ostenta , Florida; G: M. apexdiversus , Florida; H: M. modesta, Cuba; I: M. nigrocinta, Cuba.
Figura 8. A-D. Marshallora apexdiversus spec. nov. A: holotipo, 6,2 mm, Florida (FLMNH); B-D:
paratipos, 6,9, 6,5, 4,6 mm, Florida (FLMNH). E-I. Protoconchas de diferentes especies de Marshal-
lora. E, F: M. ostenta. Florida; G: M. apexdiversus. Florida; H: M. modesta, Cuba; I: M.
nigrocinta, Cuba.
103
IberuSy 26 (1), 2008
cióse to the suture; under high magnifi-
cation numerous tubercles can be seen. On
the first two whorls of the teleoconch there
is one prominent cord in the middle and
another smaller one below the suture; both
ha ve prominent nodules numbering about
10-11 per whorl. On the subsequent whorls
there is a small nodulous cord below the
suture with another small, slightly nodu-
lous one below it; these are followed by
the most prominent cord, with rather
sharply pointed nodules, and one more
below it, cióse to the lower suture. The
aperture is rounded but irregular, as the
shell is juvenile.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
2.1 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks: No other species has these
characters, with one spiral cord with
very prominent nodules and 3 weaker
spirals. The closest species may be the
new species I. harryleei (see below).
Inella apexbilirata spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 12C-E)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 12C) (ANSP 367841); 4 paratypes (ANSP 367840) (Fig. 12D). All from
the type locality.
Type locality: Lucaya, Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas 26° 29' 45" N, 78° 37' 15" W (J. Wors-
fold), 300 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the beginning of the protoconch, with two spirals com-
mencing from the nucleus.
Description : Shell (Figs. 12C, 12D)
small, subcylindrical, elongate, shiny,
whitish and solid. Protoconch (Fig. 12
E), shining white, with a very small
nucleus, a diameter of nearly 400 pm
and a height of about 660 pm, 3 whorls
with two smooth spiral cords which
begin just on the nucleus. The teleo-
conch has two main beaded cords, the
lower one slightly larger; one smooth
smaller cord occurs at the suture. The
nodules on the main spirals are pointed
and cut at the middle. The axial ribs
which connect the nodules are scarcely
evident and are slightly prosocline.
There are about 13 on the first whorls
and 17 on the last. Aperture ovoid,
siphonal canal very short and open.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
3.5 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks: The species with two main
spirals are the following:
I. bigemma and I. inflata have whorls
that increase quickly in width, and the
latter species has a pupoid protoconch.
I. harryleei spec. nov. (see below) has
spirals 1 and 3 at the beginning, spiral 2
appearing later and being smaller.
I. ibex has the same number of
nodules in spite of being a more devel-
oped shell. Besides the two main spirals
there is only one more near the suture.
I. torticula has three spirals on the
first whorls and 4-5 on the last ones.
I. colon has two spirals but equidis-
tant from both sutures.
I. compsa also has two main spirals,
with spiral 1 being smaller; its proto-
conch is unknown, but the whorls on
this shell increase rapidly in width.
I. enopla and I. meteora have a very
different wide, pupoid protoconch.
Inella pinarena Espinosa, Ortea and Fernández-Garcés, 2007 (Figs. 12F-J)
Inella pinarena Espinosa, Ortea and Fernández-Garcés, 2007. Avicennia, 19: 73, fig. 46. [Type local-
ity: Yemayá, Maria la Gorda, Guanahacabibes, Pinar del Rio, Cuba],
Description: See Espinosa, Ortea and 12F. 12G), are shown in SEM pho-
Fernández-Garcés (2007). Shells (Figs. tographs. We add some informations on
104
ROLÁN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 9. A. Cerithium bigemma Watson, 1880. lectotype, 13.5 mm (BMNH). B. Inella bigemma ,
shell, 13.0 mm (BMNH). C. Cerithium inflatum Watson, 1880, lectotype, 4.8 mm (BMNH).
Figura 9. A. Cerithium bigemma Watson, 1880. lectotipo, 13,5 mm (BMNH). B. Inella bigemma,
concha, 13,0 mm (BMNH). C. Cerithium inflatum Watson, 1880, lectotipo, 4,8 mm (BMNH).
the protoconch (Figs. 12H, 121): small
tubercles are present on the protoconch
surface between the spiral ribs. The
microsculpture of the teleoconch (Fig.
12J) is formed by very small spiral striae,
more evident on the subsutural part.
Distribution : Only known from the
type material.
Remarks : This species was recently
described but, in the original descrip-
tion, only one optical photo was pre-
sented. More details on the shell, proto-
conch and microsculpture are here illus-
trated, showing that there is no similar-
ity with other species of the group in the
Caribbean.
Inella harryleei spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 13A-K)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 13A) and 2 (s) paratypes in FLMNH; one more in BMSM (Fig. 13B)
all ex CHL; another in CHL (Fig. 13C); all from the type locality. Other paratypes: 9 j and f, 28° 4.57'
N, 90° 59.99' W, 87.9 m (E.F. Garcia /Pelican, 9/1-5/01) (CHL); 1 j, from the same locality (USNM);
2 j more 26° 06.866' N, 91° 02.418' W, off Louisiana, 59-65 m (E.F. Garcia /Pelican, 6/30/01)(CHL);
105
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
1 f, off Alligator Reef Light, Lower Florida Keys (J. Moore, 1965) (ANSP 312593); 3 s, SW of Egmont
Key, Florida (D. Steger, 1966) 366-420 m (ANSP 306391); 3 j, W of Tampa Bay, Florida (Richardson)
500 m (ANSP 335492); 1 s, Hillsborough Co., 110 miles SW of Egmont Key, Florida (D. Steger, 1953)
165 m (FLMNH 151609); 1 s (Fig. 13D), Hillsborough Co., SW of Egmont Key, Florida (J. Moore,
1967) 46 m (FLMNH 158178).
Other material examined: 2 f, Stn. 15, Florida (MCZ 356092) which are not in sufficiently good con-
dition to examine all their characters and attribute them with certainty to this species; 1 f (A.M.
Norman coll.) (Blake Expedition), West Indies (BMNH acc. n° 2283).
Type locality: off Dry Tortugas, Monroe Co., Florida, 90 m (J. Moore/ Cavalier, 1992).
Etymology: The species is named after Harry G. Lee, American malacologist who lent us the mate-
rial on which this species is based.
Description : Shell (Figs. 13A-13D)
elongate, very large for the genus, solid,
well sculptured. Protoconch (Figs. 13G-
13K) with between 3 and 3 V4 whorls,
bulbous, white, with barely discernible
separation from the teleoconch, the first
whorl smooth and the next with two
spiral cords that are sometimes a little
irregular; on the last whorl the lower
cord is more prominent, and the upper
one may divide in two. The teleoconch
has many whorls, 22 in the holotype
and 17 in a paratype (Fig. 13B). The first
whorls have two spiral nodulous cords
(spirals 1 and 3), connected by very
narrow prosocline ribs; below, around
the fourth or fifth whorls, spiral 2
appears between those cords and
remains very narrow for several whorls;
after the tenth whorl spiral 3 becomes a
little larger, and on the subsequent
whorls it is more clearly different and
prominent (Fig. 13E). Spiral 2 strength-
ens but continúes to be the smallest cord
until the end. The suture is very deep.
The axial ribs are slightly prosocline.
Aperture (Fig. 13F) ovoid, siphonal
canal narrow and large, dark in colour.
Shell colour light brown or white with
irregular brown axial flammules.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
18.3 mm. The paratypes are smaller.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks: The present species must be
compared to and differentiated from the
following:
I. longissima is uniformly white and
more cylindrical, having three equal spi-
ral cords throughout most of the spire,
and another smaller one on the suture
which is relatively shallower; the shell
sculpture is very similar from the begin-
ning to the end with only a little more
prominence of the lowermost cord.
I. pseudolongissima spec. nov. is white
with 4 cords, the upper one smooth at
the suture, the following two very small,
and only the lowermost is clearly
prominent; the suture is not deep; the
protoconch has more whorls.
I. noduloides spec. nov. has one
prominent beaded spiral cord with three
more smaller ones which are absent
from the first whorls of the teleoconch
of I. harryleei.
Other elongate deep water species
are Inella colon Dalí, 1881, and I. ibex
Dalí, 1881; both have only two spiral
beaded cords per whorl.
Inella aff. harryleei (Figs. 14A, B)
Material examined: 1 s, Manatee Co., West of Anna María Key, Florida (J. Moore, 1961) (McGinty
coll.) 55 m (FLMNH 158177).
Remarks : The specimen studied is in
perfect condition and appears rather
similar to I. harryleei spec. nov., but it
differs in the following characters: a
more pointed protoconch, with about
two whorls and an angulation on the
second whorl, without visible cords; on
the teleoconch, spiral 1 is not larger than
spiral 2, but is less prominent; on the
base, below spiral 3, there is only one
106
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 10. Inella longissima (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotype, 26.7 mm, off Havana, 175 m (MCZ 7381);
B: shell, 27.9 mm (ANSP); C, D: detail of the spire of lectotype; E: fragment of first whorls, 6.3
mm (ANSP); F: juvenile with protoconch (ANSP 312592); G: detail of last whorls of the shell
from Figure B.
Figura 10. Inella longissima (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotipo, 26,7 mm, fuera de La Habana, 175 m (MCZ
7381); B: concha, 27,9 mm (ANSP); C, D: detalle de la espira del lectotipo; E: fragmento de las
primeras vueltas, 6,3 mm (ANSP); F: juvenil con protoconcha (ANSP 312592); G: detalle de las
últimas vueltas de la concha de la Figura B.
107
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
smooth cord and another very small one
immediately below. The siphonal canal
is shorter.
Dimensions : The only shell studied
measures 28.8 mm.
All these differences indícate that
this shell may represent a séparate
species, but they are not enough to
justify naming it. Additional material is
required.
Inella triserialis (Dalí, 1881) (Figs. 14C-E, 36E)
Triforis (Inella) triserialis Dalí, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 84. [Yucatán Strait, 640 fms (1171 m).
Off Cape San Antonio, 640 fms (1171 m). Station 2, 805 fms (1472 m)].
Triforis (Inella) triserialis Dalí, 1881. In Dalí, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249, pl. 20, figs. 5a, 6a.
Triphora aspera auct. non Jeffreys, 1885.
Type material: Two syntypes (USNM 87319), one of them (Fig. 14C) measuring 6.4 mm is here des-
ignated as lectotype; the other shell (5.6 mm) would be a paralectotype (Fig. 14D). Both from Cape
San Antonio, Cuba, 1170 m; probably, 1 syntype (BMNH Acc. n° 2283), off Havana, 823 m (in very
bad condition).
Other material studied: 1 j, SW of Egmont Key, Florida (Steger, 1966) 366-421 m (ANSP 306391).
Description : See Dall (1881). Proto-
conch paucispiral (Fig. 14E), wide, with
about 3 whorls which have two spiral
cords, the apex depressed and smooth.
The teleoconch begins with three spiral
nodulous cords, spiral 2 being smaller
and closer to spiral 1. On the following
whorls spiral 1 increases in size, with
nodules that are larger than those on the
other cords and are cut at the middle.
These differences continué up to the end
of the shell.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
6.4 mm.
Distribution: Known from Yucatán
(México) and Cuba.
Remarks: As with other taxa, the
syntype material found in USNM and
MCZ has been examined. The material
from USNM is coincident in protoconch
and teleoconch sculpture with the
description of Dall (1881) and with one
of the figures in Dall (1898: píate 20,
fig. 5a) (Fig. 36E) but not with the other
figure (Dall, 1898: píate 20, fig. 6a),
which seems to be a different species
with a sharply pointed apex. The size of
the lectotype is slightly smaller than that
mentioned in the original description
(8.25 mm), but it may be that this type
could be partially broken. The material
from MCZ seems to be what Dall
named as var. intermedia (see below).
Dall (1989: 246) considered this
taxon in relation with Triphora aspera Jef-
freys, 1885 (preoccupied, renamed
Triphora brychia Bouchet and Guillemot,
1978; assigned to genus Strobiligera Dall,
1924 by Bouchet and Warén, 1985). He
therefore referred to Triforis (Inella) trise-
rialis var. aspera Jeffreys, 1885, which
perhaps can correspond with the figure
previously mentioned (Fig. 36E). A
syntype of Jeffreys' taxon (Fig. 14F,
BMNH 85.11.5.2673) has been examined,
and is here designa ted as lectotype. It is
a larger and sharply pointed shell with a
multispiral protoconch, and there is no
indication that this species occurs in the
Caribbean.
I. triserialis is different from most of
the Caribbean species referred to in this
work, mainly due to its spiral 1 having
larger nodules. Comparison will be
made in the Remarks of some species
described below (such as I. sarissa).
Inella intermedia (Dall, 1881) (Figs. 14G-J, 36F)
Triforis intermedius Dall, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 85. [Yucatán Strait, 1170 m; off Cape San
Antonio, 1170 m; station 2, 1472 m].
108
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 11. Inella pseudolongissima spec. nov. A: holotype, 22.0 mm, off Havana, 823 m (USNM);
B: protoconch of the holotype; C: detail of the spire; D: paratype, 10.4 mm (USNM); E:
paratype, 18.5 mm (FLMNH); F: protoconch of this paratype; G: paratype, 23.4 mm (FLMNH);
H: protoconch of this paratype.
Figura 11. Inella pseudolongissima spec. nov. A: holotipo, 22,0 mm, fuera de La Habana, 823
(USNM); B: protoconcha del holotipo ; C: detalle de la espira; D: paratipo, 10,4 mm (USNM);
paratipo, 18,5 mm (FLMNH); F: protoconcha de este paratipo; G: paratipo, 23,4 mm (FLMNH);
protoconcha de este paratipo.
109
Iberas, 26 (1), 2008
Tñforis triserialis var. intermedia Dalí, 1881. In Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoo/., 18: 287, píate 20,
fig. 8. [Habitat: 805 fms (1473 m). Barbados, 183 m].
Triphora clenchi Aguayo, 1935. Unnecessary replacement ñame pro Triforis intermedius Dall, 1881.
Type material: Syntype (Fig. 14G) here designated as lectotype (MCZ 7384) (off Cuba, Yucatán
Strait and Cape San Antonio. Depth: 1171 m. Blake 1877-1878 Exped.); one paralectotype (Fig.
14H)(MCZ 7382) (Havana, off Morro Light. Depth: 1473 m. Blake 1877-1878 Exped.). Both shells
were labeled T. triserialis.
Description : See Dall (1881). No pro-
toconch was known and the author
refers to "nucleus missing". Two spirals
of similar strength (spirals 1 and 3) are
present on the first whorls of the shell;
spiral 2 appears below and is clearly
smaller up to near the end of the spire,
where the three spirals are almost similar
in size (Fig. 141). Axial ribs prosocline,
and the nodules are spherical.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
7.9 mm.
Distribution : From Yucatán, México,
Barbados and Cuba.
Remarks: The lectotype here selected
is very similar to the shell represented in
Dall (1989: pl. 20, fig. 8) (Fig. 36F) but it
is not coincident with the description,
which refers to a size of 11 mm and 23
whorls; also the figure does not agree
with the description, because in spite of
the fact that a height of 11 mm is men-
tioned, there are not more that 15-16
whorls. The shell here selected as lecto-
type is only 7.9 mm and has 12 whorls,
and it may be the original shell which
lost some part of the spire. Anyway, it
must be kept as lectotype in order to
attain nomenclatural stability. The para-
lectotype is 7.2 mm and has about 13
whorls (MCZ 7382).
The ñame Triphora triserialis clenchi
Aguayo, 1935 is an unnecessary replace-
ment ñame for Triforis intermedius Dall,
1881 (which is the same taxon as Triforis
triserialis var. intermedia Dall, 1881 (in
Dall, 1889)). This is due to the fact that
this ñame is not preoccupied by
Cerithium intermedium C. B. Adams,
1850; initially both belonged in different
genera and finally the first one is placed
in Inella and the second was recently
placed by Rolán and Fernández-
Garcés (1995) in the genus Similiphora
Bouchet, 1985.
Lack of knowledge of the proto-
conch is a problem when comparing this
species to others from the Caribbean.
Basing this comparison on the teleo-
conch, the following species must be
taken into account:
Inella longissima has a more cylindri-
cal, more elongate shell, spiral 2 is of
similar size to the other two spirals on
most of the spire, while in I. intermedia it
is always smaller.
Inella pseudolongissima spec. nov. has
spiral 3 more prominent and with larger
nodules.
Inella harryleei spec. nov. has a typi-
cally deep suture, spiral 3 being the
most prominent, and spiral 1 is also
larger than spiral 2, these differences
being maintained to the end of the shell.
Inella triserialis has spiral 1 more
prominent and with larger nodules.
Inella ibex (Dall, 1881) (Figs. 14K-M, 36G)
Triforis ibex Dall, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 86. [Type locality: off Cape San Antonio, 1171 m;
Yucatán Strait, 1171 m; Sigsbee, off Havana, 823 m].
Triforis (Sychar) inflata var. ibex Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, 18: 249, pl. 20, fig. 12b.
Type material: A syntype (f) of 10.4 mm here designated as lectotype (Fig. 14K), off Cuba, Yucatán
Strait and Cape San Antonio, 1171 m (MCZ 7391); another syntype, now paralectotype, f of 7.7 mm,
off Havana, Cuba 823 m (MCZ 7392). Another paralectotype (Fig. 14L) (USNM 87313), off San
Antonio, Cuba, 1189 m.
110
RoláN AND FernÁNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 12 A, B. Inella noduloides spec. nov. holotype, 2.1 mm, Grand Bahama Island (ANSP). C-
E. Inella apexbilirata spec. nov. C: holotype, 3.5 mm, Grand Bahama Island (ANSP); D: paratype,
3.2 mm, Grand Bahama Island (ANSP); E: protoconch of the paratype. F-J. Inella pinarena
Espinosa, Ortea and Fernández-Garcés, 2007. F: paratype, 6.0 mm (CFG); G: shell, 5.0 mm
(MHNS); H: protoconch of the paratype; I: detail of the protoconch; J: microsculpture.
Figura 12. A, B. Inella noduloides spec. nov. holotipo, 2, 1 mm, Grand Bahama (ANSP). C-E. Inella
apexbilirata spec. nov. C: holotipo, 3,5 mm, Grand Bahama (ANSP); D: paratipo, 3,2 mm, Grand
Bahama (ANSP); E: protoconcha del paratipo. F-J. Inella pinarena Espinosa, Ortea and Fernández-
Garcés, 2007. F: paratipo, 6,0 mm (CFG); G: concha, 5,0 mm (MHNS); H: protoconcha del
paratipo; I: detalle de la protoconcha; J: microescultura.
111
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Type locality: The three localities mentioned in the original description are written on the label of
the lectotype, and henee there is no exact information about which locality applies to this type.
Description : See Dall (1881). The orig-
inal description mentions a nucleus twice
as large as that of I. colon , smooth, inflated,
rounded on top, larger than the succeed-
ing nuclear whorl, which has two incon-
spicuous narrow keels which are wavy
and almost tuberculate at first, and merge
almost imperceptibly into the usual sculp-
ture of the shell. The type material studied
has no protoconch, which obviously was
lost. The most important characters of the
teleoconch are: shell (Figs. 14K, 14L) with
two rows of nodules throughout the spire
and with one more, smaller and not nodu-
lous, occurring at the suture at the end the
spire (Fig. 14M). The nodules are cut at
the middle. The axial ribs are scarcely
appreciable and slightly prosocline.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
10.4 mm.
Distribution: Known from Yucatán
(México) and Cuba.
Remarles : Triforis ibex is the type
species of the genus Strobiligera Dall,
1924. The problem is that we have no
image or a good description of the pro-
toconch of this species, and the original
description allows us to think that the
protoconch is almost smooth, the first
whorl wider than the second and with
two whorls, which is typical of a proto-
conch of an Inella species. In this case;
Strobiligera could be a synonym of Inella.
The assignment of this species to the
genus Inella is tentative, The lectotype
here designated is similar to the shell
represented in Dall (1889, pl. 20, fig.
12b) (Fig. 36G) and also its dimensions
are closer to those referred to in the orig-
inal description.
Comments on the differences of I.
ibex from other species with two spiral
beaded cords can be seen below in I.
colon, which is the most similar species.
Inella torticula (Dall, 1881) (Figs. 15, 36H)
Triforis torticulus Dall, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoo/., 18: 82. [Type locality: Yucatán Strait, 1170 m],
Triforis (Sychar) torticula Dall, 1881. In Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249, pl. 20, fig. 11b.
Type material: One syntype (Fig. 15A) (f) here designated as lectotype, 6.7 mm, off Cuba, Yucatán
Strait, 1171 m, Blake 1877-1878 Exped. (MCZ 7390); the syntypes in USNM have been lost (Ellen
Strong, pers. comm.).
Other material examined: 1 f (Fig. 15B) (labeled as Triphora bigemma Watson, 1880), 9.7 mm, 9
whorls, Yucatán Strait, 1171 m (MCZ 7388); 1 s (Figs. 15C, 15D), 25.0 mm, Straits of Florida, 1000-
1200 m (CHL).
Description: See Dall (1881). The
most important characters are: 4 spirals,
the lowermost spiral 4 very narrow and
very cióse to the suture; spiral 1 smaller
than spirals 2 and 3, which are equal in
size and prominence. Colour whitish.
The study of an almost complete adult
shell (without protoconch) with 17.5
whorls (Figs. 15C, 15D) (CHL), allows
us to add some information: at the
beginning of the shell there are only
three spirals, almost similar in size, but
the uppermost slightly smaller; later, the
differences between spiral 1 and spirals
2-3 are more evident, and at same time
spiral 4 appears; on about whorl 13 (on
this shell) the uppermost spiral 1 is
divided in two, there being 5 spirals at
the end of the shell (Fig. 15E). The ribs
are orthocline.
Dimensions: see below.
Distribution: Known from deep
water off Florida and Cuba.
Remarks: The placement of this
species in the genus Inella is tentative, as
the protoconch and the aperture are not
known.
The syntype in MCZ (Fig. 15A), here
designated as lectotype, is a shell frag-
ment that seems to be the one figured in
112
RolAn and FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 13. Inella harryleei spec. nov. A: holotype, 18.3 mm, off Dry Tortugas, 90 m (CHL); B:
paratype 11.7 mm (BMSM); C: paratype, 12.8 mm (CHL); D: paratype, 14.6 mm (FLMNH). E:
detail of the spire of the holotype; F: detail of the aperture of the paratype in figure B; G-K: proto-
conchs of several paratypes (CHL).
Figura 13. Inella harryleei spec. nov. A: holotipo, 18,3 mm, fuera de Dry Tortugas, 90 m (CHL); B:
paratipo 11,7 mm (BMSM); C: paratipo, 12,8 mm (CHL); D: paratipo, 14,6 mm (FLMNH). E:
detalle de la espira del holotipo; F: detalle de la abertura del paratipo de la figura B; G-K: protoconchas
de varios paratipos ( CHL).
113
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Dall (1889, pl. 20, fig. 11b) (Fig. 36H),
although a little more cylindrical,
having only 4 whorls instead 6 and
measuring 6.7 mm instead of 10.5,
which could be due to the loss of two
whorls of the shell. As it is compatible
with the description, it was thought that
it should be designated as lectotype in
order to maintain nomenclatural stabil-
ity. The other shell examined (Fig. 15B)
measured 9.7 mm and had 9 whorls, the
label without any indication of "type"
and with the ñame Triphora bigemma; it
is undoubtedly the same species.
The differences with I. bigemma Wat-
son are very small, bearing in mind that
although the latter species was de-
scribed as having only two rows of
beads, the figure and the type clearly
show three on the final whorls. How-
ever, this is a juvenile, and to make a de-
cisión it would be necessary to examine
the protoconchs and to compare several
samples of both species.
The other shell studied (Figs. 15C,
15D) has a profile slightly different from
the lectotype, with the whorls expand-
ing more rapidly and with 4-5 spirals on
the final whorls. This could represent a
different species, but it is rather coinci-
dent in some characters with the shell
figured by Dall (1889) (Fig. 36H) and
for this reason it is considered to be an
example of the variability of this taxon,
which has differences between the first
and the last whorls.
Inella colon (Dall, 1881) (Figs. 16, 361)
Triforis colon Dall, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 86. [Type locality: off Havana, Cuba 450 fms
(823 m); off Cape San Antonio, 1171 and 1834 mi.
Triforis (Inella) colon Dall, 1881. In Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249, pl. 20, fig. 12.
Type material: One syntype (Fig. 16A) (f) here designated as lectotype, 12.7 mm, with the label "off
Havana, 823 m" (USNM 87315), and another syntype (Fig. 16B) (f) 7.8 mm, now paralectotype, from
the same lot. A syntype (Fig. 16C) (f) 8.6 mm, now paralectotype, from Cape San Antonio, 1171-
1834 m (MCZ 7387).
Other material examined: 2 f of 16.2 and 5.6 mm, Egmont Key, Florida, Gulf of México, (J. Moor e/Cav-
alier, 1968), 180 m (CHL); 1 s (Fig. 16E), Yucatán, 21° 60' N, 86° 80' W, ENW of Contoy Fight, off
Cape Catoche (Riley Black, Apr. 1967) (McGinty coll.) 366-412 m (FLMNH 170221); 1 s (Fig. 16F),
24° 15' 28"N, 81° 57' 89"W, Monroe Co., Straits of Florida, 236-255 m (FLMNH 26660).
Type locality: With the designation of the lectotype, the type locality is restricted to off Havana,
Cuba 823 m.
Description: See Dall (1881). In the
original description the protoconch is
mentioned as follows: nucleus and first
nuclear whorls white, polished, smooth,
flattened on top. The most important char-
acters of the teleoconch are: shell almost
cylindrical (Figs. 16A-16C), white, with
two main very narrow spiral beaded cords
and two smaller, smooth, slightly wavy
cords located near the suture; one of them
above and the other below the suture, this
being almost imperceptible. The nodules
are small and slightly prominent; the
uppermost a little larger. The axial ribs
almost inapparent, a little prosocline;
whorls very short and fíat.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
12.7 mm.
Distribution: Known from deep
water of Florida, Yucatán and Cuba.
Remarks: The lectotype (Fig. 16 A) is in
accordance with the original description
and it seems to be the shell figured in
Dall (1889: pl. 20, fig. 12) (herein Fig. 361),
having the same number of whorls and
almost the same dimensions. A paralec-
totype in the same lot as the lectotype (Fig.
16B) seems to be a different species,
because this shell has three spirals instead
of two. The paralectotype in MCZ (Fig.
16C) is a little different from the lectotype,
but it has the typical distribution of the
cords (Fig. 16D) and is probably the same
species. Some shells from the Gulf of
México (Figs. 16E and 16F) have been
included in this taxon but they could rep-
1 14
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 14. A, B. Inella aff. harryleei, shell, 28.8 mm and protoconch (FLMNH). C-E. Inella triseri-
alis (Dalí, 1881). C: lectotype, 6.4 mm (USNM); D: paralectotype, 5.6 mm (USNM); E: proto-
conch of the paralectotype. F. Triphora aspera, lectotype, 13.0 mm (BMNH) ( =Strobiligera brychia).
G-J. Inella intermedia (Dalí, 1881). G: lectotype, 7.9 mm, off Cuba, Yucatán Strait and Cape San
Antonio, 1171 m (syntype of T. triserialis, MCZ 7384). H: paralectotype, 7.2 mm, (Havana, off
Morro Light, 1473 m (syntype of T. triserialis , MZS 7382); I: detail of the sculpture of the paralec-
totype. J: shell photographed by Kaicher (ANSP, unknown size and other data). K-M. Inella ibex
(Dalí, 1881). K: lectotype, 10.4 mm, off Cuba, Yucatán Strait and Cape San Antonio, 1 171 m (MCZ
7391); L: paralectotype, 9.2 mm (USNM 87313); M: detail of the spire of the lectotype.
Figura 14. A, B. Inella aff. harryleei, concha, 28,8 mmy protoconcha (FLMNH). C-E. Inella triserialis
(Dalí, 1881). C: lectotipo, 6,4 mm (USNM); D: paralectotipo, 5,6 mm (USNM); E: protoconcha del
paralectotipo. F. Triphora aspera, lectotipo, 13, 0 mm (BMNH) ( =Strobiligera brychia). G-J. Inella inter-
media (Dalí, 1881). G: lectotipo, 7,9 mm, Juera de Cuba, Estrecho de Yucatán y Cabo de San Antonio,
1171 m (sintipo de Y. triserialis, MCZ 7384). H: paralectotipo, 7,2 mm, (La Habana, Juera de Morro
Light, 1473 m (sintipo de T. triserialis, MZS 7382); I: detalle de la escultura del paralectotipo. J: concha
fotograjiada por Kaicher (ANSP, tamaño desconocido así como otros datos). K-M. Inella ibex (Dalí, 1881).
K: lectotipo, 10,4 mm, fuera de Cuba, Estrecho de Yucatán y Cabo de San Antonio, 1171 m (MCZ 7391);
L: paralectotipo, 9,2 mm (USNM 87313); M: detalle de la espira del lectotipo.
115
IberuSy 26 (1), 2008
resent a different species, because the
spirals are more prominent and are more
widely separated than on the lectotype.
However, the lack of protoconch and the
differences of the sculpture are not very
important, and so provisionally they ha ve
been kept in this species awaiting more
material in the fu ture.
Dall (1881) referred to the differ-
ences between I. íbex and I. colon, proba-
bly because he considered both species
very similar. Unfortunately at present
their protoconchs are not known, but
Dall was of the opinión that the proto-
conch of I. íbex was twice as large as that
of I. colon. In the teleoconch characters, I.
íbex has more rapidly expanding whorls.
the nodules are larger and are cut at the
middle, and fewer whorls occupy the
same space.
The other Caribbean species may
have two spirals at the beginning of the
teleoconch, but finally have three or
more spirals. This ineludes I. pompona
and I. meteora, although spiral 1 is very
small and sometimes difficult to see.
Inella unicornium Simone, 2006, from
Brazil, has a larger shell (up to 50 mm,
the biggest known species of Triphori-
dae), which according to the original
description may be differentiated from 1.
colon not only by its larger size, but also
by its proportionally longer whorls, taller
spiral cords and projecting outer lip.
Inella undebermuda spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 17A-E)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 17A) in FLMNH; a paratype (Fig. 17B), 12.3 mm, in USNM. Both
from type locality (J.R.H. Lightboum and A.T. Guest, 1988; ex J.R.H. Lightbourn 9/8/93; ex CHL).
Type locality: S. of Castle Roads, Bermuda, 90 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latín word unde "origin" and the ñame of the arch-
ipelago where the species was collected.
Description : Shell (Figs. 17A, 17B) elon-
gate, whitish and solid. Protoconch (Fig.
17C) white, without a clear separation from
the teleoconch, with about two whorls,
the nucleus smooth, one spiral cord
appearing in the middle of the first whorl
and becoming two on the second; the
diameter of about 380 pm. The first whorls
of the teleoconch have two spiral beaded
cords (spirals 1 and 3), and a very small
smooth and narrow thread very cióse to
the suture; between the 6-7* whorls, spiral
2, which is also narrow and smooth,
appears between the other two, closer to
spiral 1. On the subsequent whorls, spiral
2 increases slowly in size, becoming
slightly undulating and with nodules
appearing at the end of the spire (Fig. 17D),
but always remaining nearer to spiral 1.
The nodules of spirals 1 and 3 are larger
and cut at the middle. Aperture (Fig. 17E)
rhomboid, columella almost straight,
siphonal canal very short and curved.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
7.8 mm, and the paratype 12.3 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarles : The holotype is the smallest
shell, but has a protoconch in good con-
dition. The paratype lacks the first proto-
conch whorl. The most important differ-
ential character is the smaller size of
spiral 2 and its location closer to spiral 1.
This species must be compared with
and separated from the following:
Inella longissima is more elongate and
cylindrical and has the three spirals similar
in size and distribution. In juveniles
assumed to belong to this species, the pro-
toconch has three whorls, and when spiral
2 appears on the first whorls of the teleo-
conch, it is in the middle between spirals
1 and 3 and not closer to the upper one.
Inella pseudolongissima spec. nov. has
a protoconch with four whorls and the
spirals of the teleoconch are different,
spiral 3 being larger and more promi-
nent than the others. Spiral 2 is only the
smaller one at the beginning.
Inella harryleei spec. nov. has three
whorls in the protoconch, and in the
teleoconch spiral 2 becomes nodulous
very early (between whorls 5-6) and is
not closer to spiral 1, and the suture is
1 16
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 15. Inella torticula (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotype, 6.7 mm (MCZ 7390); B: shell, (labeled as T.
bigemma ), 9.7 mm, 9 whorls, Yucatán Strait, 1171 m (MCZ 7388); C, D: shell, 25.0 mm, Straits
of Florida, 1000-1200 m (CHL); E: detail of sculpture. F: shell photographed by Kaicher (ANSP,
lacking size and data).
Figura 15. Inella torticula (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotipo, 6,7 mm (MCZ 7390); B: concha, (etiquetada
como T. bigemma,), 9,7 mm, 9 vueltas, Estrecho de Yucatán, 1171 m (MCZ 7388); C, D: concha,
25,0 mm, Estrechos de Florida, 1000-1200 m (CHL); E: detalle de la escultura. F: concha fotografiada
por Kaicher (ANSP, careciendo de información sobre su tamaño y otros datos).
1 17
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
more evident. Furthermore, the colour
consists of axial brown flammules and
brown siphonal canal, more elongate.
Inella intermedia has a shorter shell
and spiral 2 is strongly nodulous on the
early whorls, being almost the same size
as the other two and located at a similar
distance between them.
Inella ibex and I. colon have only two
main spirals.
Inella torticula can have up to five
spirals on the final whorls.
Inella sarissa (Dalí, 1889)
Triforis (Inella) sarissa Dalí, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoo/., 18: 247. [Type locality: near Barbados, 13°
11.54' N, 59° 38.45' W, 134 m].
Type material: The lot in USNM labeled as "87314 Holotype" of this species is empty (E. Strong,
pers. comm.).
Description : See Dall (1889).The fol-
lowing characters must be pointed out
from the original description: three rows
of strong tubercles, the uppermost being
the largest and spiral 3 the next in size; spi-
ral 2 is the smallest and is cióse to spiral 1.
It is also mentioned that one specimen had
24 whorls, thus being an elongate shell.
Dimensions : 15.5 mm is mentioned
in the original description.
Distribution: Only know from its
type locality.
Remarks: Apparently only I. triseri-
alis has the uppermost spiral with
larger nodules, but the other two
spirals have the nodules rather similar
in size; none of the other species here
described have these characters.
Anyway I. triserialis has a shorter
shell.
Inella compsa (Dall, 1927) (Figs. 17F, G)
Triphora ( Strobiligera ) compsa Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 96. [Type locality: Off Georgia].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 17F) 12.0 mm, and one paralectotype (Fig. 17G) 9.4
mm (USNM 333518).
Description : See Dall (1927).
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks : The description of the
species seems to have been based on the
characters of both lectotype and paralec-
totype, in spite of the fact that they may
be different species. The lectotype (Fig.
17F) is in accordance with the descrip-
tion with the exception that it has not
two but three prominent beaded cords
with almost orthocline ribs, but the
dimensions are those indicated in the
original description. Ffowever it is a
fragment of a shell with a broken aper-
ture and lacking a protoconch, and it is
therefore difficult to define exactly. The
paralectotype (Fig. 17G) has only two
spirals, with a third appearing on the
final whorls cióse to the undulating
thread near the suture, and it could be a
different species. Due to the lack of
additional material apart from these
mentioned types, it is preferable to wait
for more suitable material to study in
the future.
Inella pseudotorticula spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 17H-L)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 17H) in FLMNH; a paratype (Fig. 171) in USNM (both vyJ.R.H. Light-
boum, 9/8/93; ex CHL).
118
ROLÁN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 16. Inella colon (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotype, 12.7 mm, off Havana, 823 m (USNM); B: para-
lectotype, 7.8 mm, off Havana, 823 m (USNM); C: paralectotype, 8.6 mm, Cape San Antonio,
1171-1834 m (MCZ 7387); D: detail of the sculpture; E: shell, 20.3 mm, Yucatán (FLMNH); F:
shell, 29.4 mm, straits of Florida (FLMNH).
Figura 16. Inella colon (Dalí, 1881). A: lectotipo, 12,7 mm, fuera de La Habana, 823 m (USNM);
B: paralectotipo, 7,8 mm, fuera de La Habana, 823 m (USNM); C: paralectotipo, 8,6 mm, Cabo de
San Antonio, 1171-1834 m (MCZ 7387); D: detalle de la escultura; E: concha, 20,3 mm, Yucatán
(FLMNH); F: concha, 29,4 mm, estrechos de Florida (FLMNH).
119
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Type locality: South of Castle Roads, SE Bermuda, (J.R.H. Lightboum and A.T. Guest, 1988) 100 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the similarity with I. torticula.
Description : Shell (Figs. 17H, 171)
very elongate, pointed, with blunt apex,
not straight in profile, solid. Protoconch
(Fig. 17J) with about 2 l/i whorls, with a
wide nucleus and two spiral cords, of
which the upper one is smaller and less
prominent; diameter of about 400 pm.
The teleoconch has about 23 whorls (on
the holotype) with spirals 2 and 3
present from the beginning, very similar
in size, and with the nodules cut in the
middle. On the early whorls spiral 1 is
very small and is located cióse to the
upper suture, with spiral 4 appearing
like a fine thread near the lower suture;
on about the ninth whorl, spiral 1 is
more clearly defined on the upper part
of the whorl, below the suture, but is
smaller and less prominent than the
other two, while spiral 2 is the most
prominent and slightly larger; on about
the seventeenth whorl, spiral 1 contin-
úes to be closer to spiral 2 (Fig. 17K). On
about the twenty-first whorl, the three
spirals are almost similar in size. Aper-
ture (Fig. 17L) ovoid with a short
siphonal canal.
The shell has some white whorls
alternating with entirely light brown
whorls. The cords are often light brown
between the nodules.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
16.8 mm.
Distribution: Only know from the
type locality.
Remarks : This species must be com-
pared with the following ones that have
elongate shells:
Inella longissima has spirals 1 and 3 from
the beginning, with spiral 2 appearing
below; at the end of the spire the spirals
are of almost equal strength, but spiral 2
is slightly smaller and spiral 3 a little more
prominent on most of the shell.
I. pseudolongissima spec. nov. has
spirals 1 and 3 from the beginning, with
spiral 2 smaller; on the final whorls
spiral 3 is noticeably larger than the
others; the colour is whitish. The proto-
conch has four whorls.
I. harryleei spec. nov. has spirals 1
and 3 from the beginning; spiral 2
appears after the first few whorls but
remains smaller throughout the shell; at
the end, spiral 3 is very large in compar-
ison with the others; the colour is white
or light brown with brown axial flam-
mules.
I. triserialis (Dalí, 1881) has a shorter
shell with three spirals, spiral 1 being
larger with more inflated nodules. The
apex is more depressed.
I. intermedia (Dalí, 1881) has a shorter
shell with spirals 1 and 3 present at the
beginning; spiral 2 is smaller and
appears later.
I. ibex (Dalí, 1881) and I. colon have
only two prominent beaded cords.
I. torticula (Dalí, 1881) has spiral 1
less prominent on the early whorls; sub-
sequently the final whorls are wider and
have up to 5 spirals.
I. undebermuda spec. nov. has spirals
1 and 3 at the beginning of the teleo-
conch, with spiral 2 appearing between
the other two, always remaining smaller
and closer to spiral 1.
I. unicornium, described by Simone,
2006 from Brazil, has some general simi-
larity with I. pseudotorticula, but the
holotype is a shell with 40 whorls that
measures almost 50 mm in height; also
it is mentioned in the original descrip-
tion that the protoconch has only one
whorl and the teleoconch whorls have
only two beaded spiral cords, with an
additional smooth cord appearing on
the final whorl.
Inella enopla (Dalí, 1927) (Figs. 18A-E)
Triphora enopla Dalí, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 95. [Type locality: Off Fernandina, Florida, 294
fms (538 m)].
120
RoláN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 17. A-E. Inella undebermuda spec. nov. A: holotype, 7.8 mm, S. of Castle Roads, Bermuda,
90 m (FLMNH); B: paratype, 12.3 mm, same locality (USNM); C: protoconch of the holotype;
D: detail of the sculpture, holotype; E: detail of the aperture, holotype. F, G. Inella compsa (Dalí,
1927). F: lectotype, 12.0 mm, off Georgia, 803 m; (USNM); G: paralectotype, 9.4 mm, off
Georgia, 805 m (USNM). H-L. Inella pseudotorticula spec. nov. H: holotype, 16.8 mm, SE
Bermuda (FLMNH); I: paratype, 8.5 mm, S. of Castle Roads, Bermuda (USNM); J: protoconch,
holotype; K: detail of the sculpture, holotype; L: detail of the aperture.
Figura 17. A-E. Inella undebermuda spec. nov. A: holotipo, 7,8 mm, S. de Castle Roads, Bermuda, 90
m (FLMNH); B: paratipo, 12,3 mm, la misma localidad (USNM); C: protoconcha del holotipo; D:
detalle de la escultura, holotipo; E: detalle de la abertura, holotipo. F, G. Inella compsa (Dalí, 1927).
F: lectotipo, 12,0 mm, fuera de Georgia, 805 m; (USNM); G: paralectotipo, 9,4 mm, fuera de
Georgia, 805 m (USNM). H-L. Inella pseudotorticula spec. nov. H: holotipo, 16,8 mm, SE Bermuda
(FLMNH); I: paratipo, 8,5 mm, S. de Castle Roads, Bermuda (USNM); J: protoconcha, holotipo; K:
detalle de la escultura, holotipo; L: detalle de la abertura.
121
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Type material: Lectotype (2 f, labeled as "type"), here designated (Figs. 18A, 18B) and 5 paralec-
totypes (3 j, 2 f) (USNM 108074).
Other material examined: 2 f (with the label " Triforis colon"), off Havana, Cuba 823 m (Blake Expe-
dition, Sta. 243) (BMNH acc. n° 2283).
Description : Dall (1927). Protoconch
(Figs. 18C, 18D) with the apex smooth,
pupoid, wide (about 500 pm), followed
by about 2 whorls with three very cióse
cords, the uppermost smaller and the
lowest one the largest and most promi-
nent. Teleoconch whorls with two spiral
nodulous cords and another two very
fine cords that are separated by the
suture (Fig. 18E); the subsutural one is
very small and has elongate nodules,
while the one just above the suture is
smooth. The nodules on the main spi-
rals are pointed and cut at the middle.
Dimensions : The lectotype consists of
fragments measuring 7.2 and 6.6 mm.
Distribution : Only known from
Florida and Cuba.
Remarks : The original description men-
tions 15 whorls and dimensions of 11.5 x
2 mm. The glass tube labeled "type" con-
tained two fragments (7.2 and 6.6 mm
respectively), but there were no apparent
indication thar they were previously unit-
edtherefore it is doubtful, although pos-
sible, that they carne from the same shell.
However, they give a good representation
of the specific characters, and as it is not
certain whether or not they are from the
same broken shell, it is better to keep both
fragments together and consider both as
parts of the lectotype.
The large pupoid protoconch is the
most important differential character.
The most similar species are:
I. inflata has the protoconch whorls
with two scarcely visible spiral cords,
the nodules of the teleoconch smaller
and sharply pointed, the shell with
rapidly enlarging whorls.
Inella bigemma has the shell with more
rapidly enlarging whorls, spiral 1 more
developed and more clearly nodulous.
I. ibex is not so cylindrical and has
more pointed nodules, with only one
small thread near the suture, lacking the
small upper spiral on the final whorls.
I. harryleei, I. compsa, I. pseudotorticula
spec. nov. and I. intermedia have three
spiral cords.
I. colon has a more cylindrical shell,
with spiral cords less prominent, the
nodules very small, and the small cords
at both sides of the suture almost imper-
ceptible.
I. undebermuda has three main
spirals, spiral 2 being small and cióse to
spiral 1; only one small thread near the
suture.
I. pompona has a much larger space
between spiral 2 and spiral 3, the
nodules are smaller and the protoconch
is wider and more prominent at the
apex, and has two spiral cords.
Inella meteora (Dalí, 1927) (Figs. 18F-H)
"Triphora" meteora Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 95. [Type locality: Off Fernandina, Florida].
Type material: Lectotype (labeled as "type", in three fragments), here designated (Figs. 18F, 18G)
(USNM 108081) and 3 paralectotypes.
Description : Dall (1927). The proto-
conch (Fig. 18G) is pupoid with about 2
whorls and a diameter of about 600 pm;
below the nucleus there are two main
smooth spiral cords and another smaller
subsutural one.
The whorls of the teleoconch have
three spiral cords from the beginning
(Fig. 18H), the lower two more similar
in prominence, the nodules slightly
larger on spiral 2; the uppermost is
smaller from the beginning of the teleo-
conch and also is less prominent on the
final whorls. The nodules are uniformly
rounded on spiral 1 and larger and cut
at the middle on the other two. Above
122
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 18. A-E. Inella enopla (Dalí, 1927). A, B: two fragments labeled as “type”, 7.2, 6.6 mm,
538 m (USNM); C, D: protoconch of a paralectotype; E: detail of the sculpture of a paralectotype.
F-H. Inella meteora (Dalí, 1927). F, G: two fragments labeled as “type” 4.0 and 5.1 mm, off Fer-
nandina, 538 m (USNM); H: detail of the sculpture.
Figura 18. A-E. Inella enopla (Dalí, 1927). A, B: dos fragmentos etiquetados como “tipo”, 7,2, 6,6
mm, 538 m (USNM); C, D: protoconcha de un paralectotipo; E: detalle de la escultura de un paralec-
totipo. F-H. Inella meteora (Dalí, 1927). F, G: dos fragmentos etiquetados como “tipo” 4,0 y 5,1 mm,
fuera de Fernandina, 538 m (USNM); H: detalle de la escultura.
123
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
the suture there is a small undulating
thread.
Dimensions : See below.
Distribution : Only know from its
type locality.
Remarks : The original description gives
dimensions of 9 x 2 mm; the fragments in
the tube labeled "type" measure 6.2, 5.1
and 4.0 mm; they are of the same species
but probably not from the same shell.
The 3 paralectotypes in the other
tube appear to be a different species.
The differences with the closest
species are:
1. bigemma has two spirals at the
beginning of the teleoconch.
I. pompona and I. inflata have two
spirals at the beginning of the teleo-
conch and a wider, pupoid protoconch.
I. longissima has two spirals at the
beginning, subsequently three regular
spirals of similar size, with spherical
nodules, and the protoconch has three
whorls.
I. pseudolongissima spec. nov. has a
protoconch with 4 whorls, and spirals 2
and 3 are more evident at the beginning
of the teleoconch.
I. harryleei has a more depressed
apex on the protoconch; on the teleo-
conch the lower spiral is larger, with
spiral 2 smaller.
I. ibex and I. enopla have only two
spirals on the protoconch.
I. torticula can have up to 5 spirals at
the end.
I. colon is more cylindrical and has
only two main spirals on the teleoconch
with small nodules.
I. undebermuda spec. nov. has two
main spirals at the beginning of the
teleoconch and one smaller spiral 2 in-
between, located closer to spiral 1.
I. compsa is more conical, having
more rapidly enlarging whorls; the
nodules are less prominent and spheri-
cal.
I. pseudotorticula spec. nov. has a pro-
toconch with a smaller diameter and
with 2 well defined cords; only spirals 2
and 3 are present at the beginning of the
teleoconch, spiral 1 appearing later.
Inella pompona (Dalí, 1927) (Figs. 19A-C)
Triphora (Strobiligera) pompona Dalí, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 94. [Type locality: Off Georgia].
Type material: In the material under this ñame from USNM (Figs. 19A-19C) there is a label men-
tioning "type", but in the three glass tubes there is no other indication. The shell measuring almost
20 mm with 21 whorls is here designated as lectotype (Fig. 19A); it is referred to in the original
description as the "larger but imperfect specimen" because the apex is missing. Numerous para-
lectotypes (USNM 108339), most of them fragments (6 in one tube and 48 in another); the largest
fragment measures 23.5 mm.
Description : Dall (1927). The proto-
conch (Fig. 19B) is pupoid and wide, the
nucleus and the first whorl wider than
the subsequent ones, with the diameter
of the first whorl between 650 and 750
pm; in the original description it is
described as having 1 1/i whorls, but it
can have more than 2 whorls, the
second one with two spiral cords. Teleo-
conch with two main spirals (spirals 2
and 3); spirals 1 and 4 are very cióse to
the suture, which separates them (Fig.
19C). Spiral 1 has very small nodules,
while spiral 4 is smooth. The nodules on
the main spirals are not very prominent
and only a little higher than the cords,
and they are slightly cut at the middle.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
almost 20 mm, and some shells are
somewhat larger.
Distribution : Only know from the
type locality.
Remarks : The species with a pupoid
and wide protoconch are:
I. enopla has a slightly narrower pro-
toconch of three whorls, with three
scarcely visible spiral cords.
I. ibex and I. colon each have informa-
tion on the protoconch in the original
description, but shells with a complete
124
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 19. A-C. Inella pompona (Dalí, 1927). A: lectotype, 19.5 mm, 804 m (USNM); B: proto-
conch of a paralectotype; C: detail of the sculpture of lectotype. D-I. Inella dinea (Dalí, 1927). D:
lectotype, 7.9 mm, 804 m (USNM); E-G: paralectotypes, 6.6, 6.0. 4.7 mm, same locality; H, I:
protoconchs, lectotype and paralectotype.
Figura 19. A-C. Inella pompona (Dalí, 1927). A: lectotipo, 19,5 mm, 804 m (USNM); B: protocon-
cha de un paralectotipo; C: detalle de la escultura del lectotipo. D-I. Inella dinea (Dalí, 1927). D: lec-
totipo, 7,9 mm, 804 m (USNM); E-G: paralectotipos, 6,6, 6,0, 4,7 mm, la misma localidad; H, I:
protoconchas, lectotipo y paralectotipo.
125
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
apex are not known; on the teleoconch
there are similarly two spiral beaded
cords, but on 1. colon the sutural area is
narro wer and the nodules are smaller; I.
ibex has smooth spirals at the beginning
of the teleoconch.
I. inflata has a similar protoconch,
but clearly narrower; there is a greater
increase in the width of the whorls and
the suture is more prominent.
I. undebermuda spec. nov. has a nar-
rower protoconch; in the teleoconch.
between the main spirals 1 and 3, there
is a small spiral 2 closer to spiral 1.
1. dinea (see below).
The species with unknown proto-
conch:
I. compsa has rapidly enlarging
whorls and three almost similar spirals.
I. sarissa has spiral 1 larger, with
spiral 2 very small and cióse to spiral 1.
I. bigemma has small nodules on
spiral 1 and fewer whorls, never elon-
gated.
Inella dinea (Dalí, 1927) (Figs. 19D-I)
" Triphora " pompona dinea Dalí, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 94. [Type locality: Off Georgia, 440 fms
(805 m)].
Type material: Lectotype (Fig. 19D), here designated, and 11 paralectotypes (Figs. 19E-19G)
(USNM 333517).
Description : Dall (1927), comparing
shells to typical I. pompona, only men-
tioned that the beading is less promi-
nent and the shells are more slender and
compact, measuring 10 mm for 15
whorls, with a máximum diameter of
1.75 mm. Now it can be added that the
protoconch (Figs. 19H, 191) has between
2 !A - 2 1 ¡2 smooth whorls and is a little
variable in size, but it can reach up to
700 pm and is pupoid at the apex, with
a large nucleus and with two or three
depressed smooth cords on the second
whorl. On the teleoconch, the suture has
a smooth fine cord on each side. The
axial sculpture is formed by small ribs
on some shells; on others the ribs are
almost absent; there are small orthocline
growth lines. There are three spirals,
equal in size on the lectotype but with
spiral 1 less prominent on other shells.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
7.9 mm.
Distribution : Rosenberg (2005) gives
coordinates of 30.73° N, 79.43° W, with a
depth of 805 m.
Remarks: In the material studied
there was no shell measuring 10 mm,
but the designated lectotype has 14
whorls including the protoconch, and is
almost 8 mm. This shell was chosen
because the number of whorls is closest
to the number given in the description.
Also because it has three similar cords
on each whorl, very different from T.
pompona. Not all the paralectotypes
seem to be the same species.
Although the present taxon was pub-
lished as a variety of T. pompona, compar-
ison of the types of both species allowed
us to confirm that they are different
species. T. pompona has two nodulous
cords per whorl and a very small cord,
lacking nodules, on either side of the
suture. T. dinea has a similar pupoid pro-
toconch but the shell is variable, with
some shells having three cords of similar
size; other shells have only two spiral
nodulous cords and the third, near the
suture, is depressed. These could repre-
sent characters of two different species
but, as the studied material did not
inelude enough complete shells, it is better
to keep these two morphs within T. dinea.
I. sentoma has a fíat profile, lacks
nodules and is also a larger shell.
I. gaesona has depressed spirals
almost without nodules and the proto-
conch is narrower, with a depressed
apex.
I. inflata has a narrower protoconch,
with 2 poorly defined cords. The teleo-
conch has more prominent spirals and
nodules.
126
Rolan AND FernÁNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 20. A, B. Inella sentoma (Dalí, 1927). A: lectotype, 28 mm, off Fernandina, 538 m
(USNM): B: paralectotype, 4.4 mm, same locality (USNM). C. Inella gaesona (Dalí, 1927), lecto-
type, 9 mm, off Georgia, 805 m (USNM). D-H. Inella differens spec. nov. D: holotype, 7.6 mm,
off Egmont Key, Hillsborough Co., Florida (FLMNH); E: paratype, 6.2 mm; F, G: protoconchs of
holotype and paratype; H; detail of the sculpture.
Figura 20. A, B. Inella sentoma (Dalí, 1927). A: lectotipo, 28 mm, fuera de Fernandina, 538 m
(USNM): B: paralectotipo, 4,4 mm, la misma localidad (USNM). C. Inella gaesona (Dalí, 1927),
lectotipo, 9 mm, fuera de Georgia, 805 m (USNM). D-H. Inella differens spec. nov. D: holotipo , 7,6
mm, fuera de Egmont Key, Hillsborough Co., Florida (FLMNH); E: paratipo, 6,2 mm; F, G: protocon-
chas del holotipo y paratipo; H; detalle de la escultura.
127
Negro
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Inella sentoma (Dalí, 1927) (Figs. 20A-B)
Triphora sentoma Dalí, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 96. [Type locality: Off Fernandina, Florida, 805 m].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 20A), 28 mm and a paralectotype (Fig. 20B), 4.4
mm (USNM 108072).
Description : See Dall (1927). The pro-
toconch is unknown. Both the lectotype
and paralectotype are in very poor con-
dition, so the most important characters
from the original description are men-
tioned here: two low flattened spiral cords,
faintly undulated, one at the periphery of
the whorl, the other in front of it; the suture
linear with a minute threadlet on each side
of it, the interspaces shallow.
In reality it can be said that there are
grooves and orthocline growth lines, but
no prominent sculpture.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures
28 mm.
Distribution : Only know from its
type locality.
Remarks : This species is very elongate
and with depressed sculpture. There is no
Information about the protoconch or aper-
ture, but in the original description it is
mentioned that one of the fragments had
a protoconch of a whorl and a half. For
this reason and the almost cylindrical shell
form it is included in the genus Inella.
The paralectotype (Fig. 20B) is more
similar to the lectotype of I. gaesona (see
below).
No other Inella species in the studied
area has such depressed sculpture.
Inella gaesona (Dall, 1927) (Figs. 20C)
Triphora (Strobiligera) gaesona Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 95. [Type locality: Off Georgia, 805 m].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 20C) with 16 whorls, 9 mm (USNM 1088341). Para-
lectotypes: 15 s and f (not examined) (USNM).
Description: See Dall (1927). Proto-
conch paucispiral, pupoid and de-
pressed, with the first whorl wider than
the following one. The spiral sculpture
is formed more by grooves which sepá-
rate the whorls into three parts than by
prominent spirals. The axial sculpture
consists only of orthocline growth lines.
Dimensions: The lectotype measures 9 mm.
Distribution: Only know from its
type locality.
Remarks: Species very different from
any other due to the pupoid and
depressed protoconch and the fíat spiral
cords without nodules. It only has some
similarity to I. sentoma, but a complete
comparison could not be made because
of the poor condition of the lectotype of
this species and the lack of sufficient
material. For this reason they are kept as
different valid taxa, awaiting more
material for study.
Inella differens spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 20D-H)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 20D) in FLMNH. Paratype (Fig. 20E) in BMSM (both ex CHL).
Other material examined: Off Louisiana: 3 f without protoconch, 28° 05.61' N, 91° 02.245' W by
28° 05.524' N, 91° 02.036' W, 58 m (E. F. Garda/ Pelican 06/09/00) (CHL).
Type locality: Off Egmont Key, Hillsborough Co., Florida, USA, (J. Moor e/Caualier, 1962), 135 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the shell having different characters from others in the area.
Description: Shell subcylindrical toconch (Figs. 20F, 20G) pupoid with 1
(Figs. 20D, 20E) solid, light brown. Pro- 3A -2 whorls and a diameter of about
128
ROLÁN and FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 21. A-D. Inella slapcinskyi spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 2.6 mm (FLMNH); C: protoconch of
the holotype; D: detail of the fragment (ANSP). E-I. 1: Inella faberi spec. nov. E: holotype, 3.7
mm; F, G: paratypes, 4.4 and 3.0 mm. Louisiana (FLMNH); H, I: protoconch and detail of teleo-
conch sculpture, paratype in figure F.
Figura 21. A-D. Inella slapcinskyi spec. nov. A, B: holotipo , 2,6 mm (FLMNH); C: protoconcha del
holotipo ; D: detalle del fragmento (ANSP). E-I. 1: Inella faberi spec. nov. E: holotipo, 3.7 mm; F, G:
paratipos, 4.4 y 3.0 mm. Louisiana (FLMNH); H, I: protoconcha y detalle de la escultura de la telo-
concha, paratipo de la figura F.
129
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
600 pm, the nucleus smooth and the
whorls with two smooth spiral cords.
The teleoconch begins when the two
spiral cords become nodulous; these
beaded spirals are equal in size and
both are closer to the suture and more
widely separated in the middle of the
whorl. About the fourth or fifth whorl,
spiral 2 appears below and very cióse to
spiral 1, beginning as a fine thread
undulating beneath the nodules (Fig.
20H). Immediately it becomes nodulous
but with a smaller nodular size. About
the eleventh whorl the nodules reach
almost the size of those on spirals 1 and
3. There are three additional smooth
cords on the base. Aperture ovoid elon-
gate; siphonal canal short and open.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
7.6 mm.
Distribution: Only know from its
type locality.
Remarks : This species is kept in the
genus Inella due to the characteristic
protoconch.
It may be differentiated from most of
the other closely similar species by its
short protoconch with only 1 3A - 2
whorls and its brown colour:
I. dinea has more weakly sculptured
whorls and the protoconch has a wider
pupoid form.
1. meteora, I. undebermuda spec. nov., I.
enopla and I. pompona have a similar
number of protoconch whorls but the apex
is more inflated and pupoid, and the shells
are larger and white; furthermore, I. meteora
has three spiral cords on the teleoconch,
spiral 1 being smaller; I. undebermuda has
spiral 2 beginning on about the tenth whorl
(instead of on the fourth in I. differens), and
it is very small and closer to spiral 1; I.
enopla and I. pompona have two main spiral
cords on the teleoconch with an additional
cord on each side of the suture, the proto-
conch being very much wider.
I. triserialis has a rather similar shell
but the protoconch has 3 whorls, the
apex is more depressed, the nodules of
spiral 1 are larger and cut at the middle.
I. sarissa is white, spiral 2 is smaller
and very cióse to spiral 1.
I. compsa has rapidly enlarging
whorls, and spiral 2 is not smaller.
I. intermedia has a larger shell that is
lighter, whitish and more conical, the
spirals almost equal in size.
See also I.faberi below.
Inella slapcinskyi spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 21A-D)
Type material: Holotype (juvenile, Figs. 21A, 21B) (FLMNH UF350382).
Other material studied: 1 f (ANSP).
Type locality: Cayman Islands, Little Cayman, Jackson's Bight (P. Watson, Dec/1992), 35 m.
Etymology: The species is named after John Slapcinsky, Curator of Molluscs of the FLMNH, for
his help in the examination of the material housed in this museum.
Description: Shell (Figs. 21A, 21B)
small, almost cylindrical, whitish. Proto-
conch paucispiral (Fig. 21C) with a
diameter of about 400 pm and almost
three whorls, with two narrow spiral
cords on the first whorl, three on the fol-
lowing, well defined, the lower one
more prominent; each spiral cord bears
a row of small tubercles on its upper
surface. The nucleus of the protoconch
is very small. The teleoconch has four
spirals; spiral 1 has more prominent
nodules; spiral 4 is the next in size and
spirals 2 and 3 have smaller, elongated
nodules (Fig. 21D). The axial ribs are
wide and strongly prosocline. On the
base there are two more smooth spirals.
Aperture rounded with a strong col-
umellar callus; siphonal canal short and
open.
Dimensions: The holotype measures
2.6 mm.
Distribution : Only known from its
type locality.
Remarks : This species has been
named in spite of the scarcity of avail-
able material because the shell and the
protoconch have characters that are
absolutely different from any other
species of this group in the study
130
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 22. Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1995). A-C: shells, 4.9, 4.9 and
4.8 mm, E Palm Beach, Florida (CHL); D-F: protoconchs; G-H: radula, specimen from off Palm
Beach, Florida (CHL); I: operculum.
Figura 22. Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán y Fernández-Garcés, 1995). A-C: conchas, 4,9, 4,9 y
4.8 mm, E Palm Beach, Florida (CHL); D-F: protoconchas; G-H: rádula, de un ejemplar de fuera de
Palm Beach, Florida ( CHL); L: opérculo.
131
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
area. Only I. torticula has 4 beaded area has a row of tubercles on the pro-
spirals, and no species in the study toconch.
Inella faberi spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 21E-I)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 21E) and 2 paratypes (Figs. 21F, 21G) in FLMNH (UF 291343).
Type locality: Louisiana, 28.05731° N, 92.44963° W, 71-74 m.
Etymology: The species is named after the Dutch malacologist Marien Faber, who studied many
of the species of Caribbean Triphoridae and helped us in some aspects of this work.
Description: Shell (Figs. 21E-21G)
subcylindrical, solid, brownish in
colour. Protoconch (Fig. 21FF) with
almost three whorls which have two
narrow well defined spirals, the lower
of which is a little more prominent; its
diameter is about 450 pm. The teleo-
conch begins with two nodulous spirals
1 and 3, quite cióse together; spiral 1 is
slightly smaller and less prominent
than spiral 3. Subsequently spiral 2
appears between them and remains
smaller (Fig. 211). The axial ribs which
connect the nodules are strongly proso-
cline. The nodules are different on the
three spirals: on spiral 1 they are spheri-
cal and a little ovoid, on spiral 2 they
are very elongate and narrow, and on
spiral 3 the nodules are larger and cut
by the spiral which crosses them. Aper-
ture rounded but in poor condition on
all the type material.
Dimensions: The holotype measures
3.7 mm. One paratype reaches 4.4 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks: The most similar species are:
I. differens spec. nov. has a wider pro-
toconch, apically more depressed and
with only 2 whorls, the nodules of the
teleoconch are all spherical and the axial
ribs almost orthocline.
I. undebermuda spec. nov. has a proto-
conch with only 2 whorls, the nucleus
more elevated; spiral 2 on the teleo-
conch is closer to spiral 1 and the axial
ribs are slightly prosocline.
I. apexbilirata spec. nov. has cords of sim-
ilar size on the protoconch, the shell is
whitish, and on the teleoconch spiral 1 has
very small nodules, spirals 2 and 3 have
larger nodules which are cut at the middle,
and the axial ribs are almost orthocline.
I. harryleei spec. nov. has a very elon-
gate shell, a protoconch with cords of
similar size, and the teleoconch has
spiral 3 with much larger and more
prominent nodules.
Genus Sagenotriphora Marshall, 1983
Type species (by original designa tion): Triphora
and northern New Zealand.
Description : Protoconch multispiral
with reticulate sculpture on the first
whorl; radula with a rachidian tooth
impulla Hedley, 1903. Recent, Southern Australia
which is separated into two parts,
and only one lateral and one
marginal.
Sagenotriphora osclausum (Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1995) (Figs. 22A-I)
" Triphora " osclausum Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1995. Apex, 10(1): 21.
Type material: Holotype and paratypes (see Rolán and Fernández-Garcés, 1995)
Other material examined: Florida: 3 s, beach drift, Little Torch Key, Monroe Co., (M. Teskey, 5/76)
(CHL); 2 sp, 32 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co. (T. Yocius 6/81; ex J. Dawley 12/2/90), 30 m
132
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 23. A-F. Sagenotriphora candidula spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 5.0 mm (FLMNH); C:
paratype 3.9 mm, from type locality (BMSM); D: protoconch of the holotype; E: operculum; F:
drawing of the radula. G, H. “Triphora” abrupta (Dalí, 1881); G: lectotype, 7.9 mm (MCZ 7389);
H: Detail of the spire. I-K. “Triphora caracca Dalí, 1927. I: lectotype, 7.1 mm, off Georgia, 805
m (USNM): J, K: paralectotypes, 6.9, 6.7 mm, same locality (USNM).
Figura 23. A-F. Sagenotriphora candidula spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 5, 0 mm (FLMNH); C: paratipo
3,9 mm, de la localidad tipo (BMSM); D: protoconcha del holotipo; E: opérculo; F: dibujo de la
rádula. G, H. “Triphora” abrupta (Dalí, 1881); G: lectotipo, 7,9 mm (MCZ 7389); H: Detalle de la
espira. I-K. “Triphora” caracca Dalí, 1927. I: lectotipo, 7,1 mm, fuera de Georgia, 805 m (USNM): J,
K: paralectotipos, 6,9, 6,7 mm, la misma localidad (USNM).
133
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
(CHL); 5 sp (Figs. 22A-22C)(one destroyed by radular study), E Palm Beach (J. Root; ex K. Sunder-
land 1991) 30 m (CHL); 5 s, SW Egmont Key, 73-92 m (Steger, 1966) (ANSP 306356); 2 s, Monroe
Co. Dry Tortugas area, 25 30' N, 59 m (FLMNH 154901); 3 s, Palm Beach Co., off Singer Id.
(McGinty/Jun 1940) 183-274 m (FLMNH 257141); 2 s, Palm Beach Co., off Palm Beach (McGinty/Jan
1950) 92 m (FLMNH 205145); 8 s, Palm Beach Co., reefs (D. Akers/ 1970-1 971) 30 m (FLMNH 127829);
15 sp, Palm Beach Co., off Delray Beach, Manalapan Wreck (McGinty), 10 m (FLMNH 249896); 1
s, Palm Beach Co., off Yamato Rocks (F. B. Lyman/ Apr 1939) 11 m (FLMNH 10242). Bahamas: 2
s. Iridian Cay, Grand Bahama Island 26° 42' 45"N, 78° 39' 15"W (Worsfold) (ANSP 366953).
Description : Rolán and Fernández-
Garcés (1995). Shell (Figs. 22A-22C)
light brown with the protoconch darker.
Radula (Figs. 22G, 22H): With the
formula 4-1-1-1-4. Central tooth divided
in two parts by a deep separation. Each
of these two prominences finishes in
four short sharp pointed cusps. Lateral
teeth elongate and with the form of a
half tube, the end curved with 6-7
pointed and short cusps. Four marginal
teeth in each side, fíat, elongate, and at
their ends are about 15-17 very fine and
elongate cusps, which are shorter on
one side and more elongate on the other.
Dimensions: The holotype measures 4.5
mm. Some shells can reach up to 5.0 mm.
Distribution : Known from Florida,
Bahamas and Cuba.
Remarks : This species was described
without a generic assignment, as no soft
parts were studied. With the present
material it was possible to study the
radula from dried animáis retracted into
the shell. This radula proved to be very
different from all those previously
known, and for this reason the creation
of a new genus was considered, but it
seemed preferable to place the species
provisionally in a known genus that had
the most similar radula. In this case we
found that the genus Sagenotriphora is
almost the only one in which the rachid-
ian tooth is divided into two parts,
although it has only one wide lateral
and one marginal, contrary to the four
that are found in the present species.
Sagenotriphora osclausum had been
considered by some malacologists (the
label of most of the studied material) to
be Triphora dupliniana Olsson, 1916. This
taxon is a fossil species and it may be
differentiated by the shorter shell and
the open siphonal canal.
Sagenotriphora candidula spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 23A-F)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 23A, 23B) in FLMNH. Paratypes: 1 s (Fig. 23C) in BMSM; 1 s, in
USNM; all from the type locality and ex CHL. Other paratypes: 3 s, off Anna Maria Island, Manatee
Co., Florida (J. Moore /Cavalier, 1962), 15-30 m (CHL); 4 s, SW of Egmont Key, Florida (Steger, 1996)
40-50 m (ANSP 306346); 10 s, East Tampa Bay, Florida (C. L. Richardson) (ANSP 335494); 5 s, Palm
Beach Co., Florida (McGinty, Jul/1941) 55-73 m (FLMNH 249739); 2 s, Hillsborough Co., W of
Egmont Key, Florida (J. Moore, 1962) 183 m (FLMNH 249838); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., reefs. Florida
(D. Akers, 1970-1971) 30 m (FLMNH 127829); 13 sp, Palm Beach Co., off Delray Beach, Manalapan
Wreck, Florida (McGinty), 10 m (FLMNH 249896); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., off Singer Island, Florida
(McGinty, Jun/1940) 30 m (FLMNH 178388); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., Breakers Hotel, (McGinty,
Jun/1940) 30 m (FLMNH 154860).
Other material studied: Florida: 7 s and f, SW of Egmont Key (Steger, 1996) 40-50 m (ANSP); 2 sp
(destroyed for radular studies), type locality (CHL); 11 s, in poor condition, East Tampa Bay (C. L.
Richardson) (ANSP 335494); 2 s, in poor condition, St. Augustine (FLMNH 286017).
Type locality: beach drift. Captiva Island, Florida.
Etymology: The specific ñame is the Latín word candidula which means "shining white" (diminu-
tive) and alludes to the colour of the shell.
Description : Shell (Figs. 23A-23C) elon- the whorls with two spiral threads crossed
gate, solid. Protoconch (Fig. 23D) of almost by small undulating axial ribs. The begin-
4 whorls, apex with rounded tubercles and ning of the teleoconch has two spirals, spi-
134
ROLÁN and FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 24. A-E. “ Triphora” georgiana Dalí, 1927. A: lectotype, 7.5 mm, off Georgia, 805 m (USNM);
B-E: paralectotypes, 6.0, 4.9, 5.0, 4.1 mm, same locality (USNM). F, G. “Triphora” indígena Dalí,
1927. F: lectotype, 6.6 mm, off Georgia, 805 m (USNM): G: paralectotype, 3.3 mm, same locality
(USNM). H. “ Triphora” lilacina, lectotype, 8.5 mm, Turtle Harbor, Florida, 11 m (USNM 83087).
I-O. “Triphora” cf. lilacina (Dalí, 1889). I: shell, 7.5 mm, Pinellas Co., Florida (FLMNH); J: shell,
9.0 mm, Monroe Co., Florida (FLMNH); K: shell, 8.0 mm, Palm Beach Co., Florida (FLMNH); L:
shell, SEM photo, 4.1 mm, Pickles Reef, off Key Largo, 5 m (CHL); M: apical part with protoconch,
shell in figure J; N: protoconch of shell in Figure L; O: detail of the last whorl from shell in Figure I.
Figura 24. A-E. “Triphora” georgiana Dalí, 1927. A: lectotipo, 7,5 mm, fuera de Georgia, 805 m
(USNM); B-E: paralectotipos, 6,0, 4,9, 5,0, 4,1 mm, de la misma localidad (USNM). F, G.
“Triphora” indigena Dalí, 1927. F: lectotipo, 6,6 mm, fuera de Georgia, 805 m (USNM): G: paralec-
totipo, 3.3 mm, la misma localidad (USNM). H. “Triphora” lilacina, lectotipo, 8,5 mm, Turtle
Harbor, Florida, 11 m (USNM 83087). I-O. “Triphora” cf. lilacina (Dalí, 1889). F. concha, 7,5 mm,
Pinellas Co., Florida (FLMNH); J: concha, 9,0 mm, Monroe Co., Florida (FLMNH); K: concha, 8,0
mm, Palm Beach Co., Florida (FLMNH); L: concha, SEM photo, 4,1 mm, Pickles Reef, fuera de Cayo
Largo, 5 m ( CHL); M: parte apical con protoconcha, concha de la Figura J; N: protoconcha de la
concha de la Figura L; O: detalle de la última vuelta de la concha de la Figura L.
135
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
ral 1 very cióse to the suture and spiral 3 in
the middle of the whorl. About the fourth-
fifth whorl spiral 2 appears in the middle of
the space between the other two, enlarg-
ing quickly and becoming equal to spirals
1 and 3 on the subsequent two whorls. A
very fine spiral thread appears at the
suture. Aperture oval elongate. Siphonal
canal very short, closed by the continua-
tion of the outer lip. Colour: protoconch
brown and the teleoconch uniformly
creamy-white; small areas of cream or light
brown may be visible on the base and
inside the aperture. Operculum multispiral
(Fig. 23E) ovoid, yellowish, translucent.
Dimensions : The holoype measures
5.0 mm.
Distribution : Known from Florida
coasts.
Due to the scarcity of available mater-
ial, our radular study was limited to only
two specimens. Unfortunatly, only a little
information could be obtained and the
radula could not be photographed (see
Fig. 23F). The radula (formula 3-1-1-1-3)
has a central tooth with two upward
cusps and two more externally and in the
opposite direction. The lateral teeth have
a sharp border wíth many small cusps.
The marginal has only a few cusps.
Remarks: This species had been con-
siderad by collectors to be conspecific with
the previous one (S. osclausum), which is
similar but light brown in colour.
However, the difference in the radula indi-
cated that they were different species.
S. candidula spec. nov. must be differ-
entiated from the white Cosmotriphora mela-
nura (C. B. Adams, 1850) which is larger,
with more whorls. Spiral 2 appears
earlier(3-4 whorls), the colour of the teleo-
conch is milk white and not creamy-white,
and the base is white; the apex of the pro-
toconch is narro wer; also the protoconch
is consistently dark brown and not light
brown, has only one spiral on the first and
second whorls and is also a little larger.
Marshallora ostenta spec. nov. is not
totally cream, and some spiral cords (at
least the suture) may be brown or light
brown; the siphonal canal is short and
open and the protoconch is somewhat
larger, and has one spiral cord on the
first protoconch whorl.
Genus Triphora Blainville, 1828
Type species (by monotypy): Triphora gemmatum Blainville, 1828; Recent, Mauritius.
Remarks: This genus ñame has is commontly used when generic assig-
formerly been employed as the ment is not possible, as " Triphora " sensu
nominal for the family. Consequently, it lato.
"Triphora" hircus (Dalí, 1881) (Fig. 36J)
Triforis hircus Dalí, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 9: 83. [Type locality: Yucatán Strait, 640 fms (1171 m)].
Triforis (bigemma var.?) hircus Dalí, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249, pl. 20, fig. 11.
Type material: No type in USNM (E. Strong, pers. corran.); neither in other American museums.
Figured in Dall (1889: pl. 20, fig. 11) (Fig. 36f) measuring 12.5 mm.
Description: See Dall (1881). With 14
or more inflated whitish whorls. The
most important characters in the origi-
nal description and in the figure are the
two prominent spirals, the upper one
more widely separated from the suture.
Dimensions: The original description
gives a dimensión of 12.5 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type material.
Remarks: Dall (1881) described this
species as new; later (Dall, 1889) he
revised his taxonomic opinión and he
considerad it to be probably a variety of
T. bigemma Watson, 1880; but that species
has only two spirals on the upper part of
1 36
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 25. A. Triforis atlántica E. A. Smith, 1890, lectotype, 6 mm, St. Helena. B-I. “ Triphora
atlántica. B: shell, 6.3 mm, W Egmont Key, Hillsborough Co., Florida (CHL); C, D: shells, 7.1,
4.9 mm off Guarapari, Espiritu Santo State, Brazil, 15-20 m (CHL); E, G, H: shells, 6.7, 5.3, 4.2
mm, 42 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida, 85 m (CHL); F: shell, 4.8 mm, SEM photo,
Florida (FLMNH); I: protoconch of the shell in previous figure). J. “Triphora” pyrrha Henderson
and Bartsch, 1914, syntype, 2.7 mm, Chincoteague (USNM).
Figura 25. A. Triforis atlántica E. A. Smith, 1890, lectotipo, 6 mm, St. Helena. B-I. “Triphora”
atlántica. B: concha, 6,3 mm, O Cayo Egmont, Hillsborough Co., Florida (CHL); C, D: conchas, 7,1,
4.9 mm fuera de Guarapari, Estado de Espiritu Santo, Brasil, 15-20 m (CHL); E, G, H: conchas, 6,7,
5,3, 4,2 mm, 42 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida, 85 m (CHL); F: concha, 4,8 mm, SEM
photo, Florida (FLMNH); I: protoconcha de la concha de la figura anterior). J. “Triphora” pyrrha
Henderson y Bartsch, 1914, syntype, 2,7 mm, Chincoteague (USNM).
137
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
the teleoconch, subsequently with three
spirals of which spiral 1 is smaller
(Watson, 1886, pl. 43, fig. 6). For these
reasons both taxa have been considered
here to be valid and different species.
This species has been kept here in
"Triphora" instead of in Inella due to
several characters found in the original
description: acutely tapered apex proba-
bly rather pointed, crowded transverse
sculpture (twenty-one slightly oblique
ribs, etc.), and also due to the figured
shape of the species.
Comparison must be made with the
species having 2 main spirals, basing the
differences on the teleoconch characters:
I. etiopia and I. pompona are more
cylindrical and have two small spirals
besides the two main ones.
I. colon and I. ibex have more cylin-
drical shells, and the two spirals are
located equidistan! between the sutures.
"Triphora" cylindrella (Dalí, 1881) (Fig. 36K)
Triforis cylindrella Dalí, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, 9: 83. [Type locality: Cape San Antonio, 640
fms (1171 m)].
Triforis (Sychar) cylindrella Dalí, 1881. In Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, 18: 250, pl. 20, fig. 6.
Type material: No type in USNM (E. Strong, pers. corran.), AMNH (M. Sidall, pers. corran.), or ANSP.
The lectotype, here designated, (Fig. 36K) is the specimen figured by Dall (1889, píate 20, fig. 6).
Description : See Dall (1881). Shell
with 12-14 white whorls. The most
important characters are the presence of
three similar spirals and convex whorls,
the lo west with more elongate nodules.
Dimensions: The original description
gives a dimensión of 6.5 mm.
Distribution : Only known from Cape
San Antonio.
Remarks : The placement of this species
in the genus "Triphora" s. I is tentative and
based on the original description and fig-
ure. As the type was not found, the com-
parison was made from the characters in
the original description with the species
which had three equal spirals, as follows:
I. intermedia has whorls with a fíat
profile, only 2 spirals at the beginning,
and spiral 2 is smaller on most of the
Shell.
I. torticula has convex whorls, but the
nodules are larger on spirals 2 and 3, and
the shell is more elongate and cylindrical.
I. compsa has an unknown protoconch,
so comparison is difficult; however, spiral
1 is smaller and the nodules are more
prominent.
Cosmotriphora melanura is more elon-
gate and the profile of the whorls is fíat.
Sagenotriphora candidula has only two
spirals at the beginning of the teleo-
conch and the whorls are rather fíat.
"Triphora" rushii (Dall, 1889)
Triforis rushii Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 246. [Type locality: west of North Bimini
Island, Bahamas, 200 fms (366 m)].
Type material: Holotype (USNM 61227) missing (Ellen Strong pers. comm.).
Description : See Dall (1889: 246).
Shell with 12-14 whorls. Four spirals, of
which only the lowermost is prominent,
with a row of large pointed nodules.
Above this are three much finer, lower
and undulating threads of equal size. No
ribs exist. Shell milky-white in colour.
Dimensions : 2.6 mm according to the
original description.
Remarks : No other species in the
studied area shows this kind of sculp-
ture with four spirals, the lowermost the
most prominent and with the largest
nodules.
138
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 26. A-D. “ Triphora ” inaudita spec. nov. A: holotype, 5.4 mm, SW of Dry Tortugas
(FLMNH). B: paratype, 4.4 mm (BMSM). C: details of protoconch of the holotype; D: detail of
the sculpture. E-I. “Triphora” pseudonovem spec. nov. E: holotype, 7.3 mm (FLMNH); F: detail of
the aperture of a paratype (FLMNH); G: protoconch; H: detail of the protoconch; I: detail of the
spire of the holotype.
Figura 26. A-D. “Triphora” inaudita spec. nov. A: holotipo, 5,4 mm, SO de Dry Tortugas (FLMNH).
B: paratipo, 4,4 mm (BMSM). C: detalle de la protoconcha del holotipo; D: detalle de la escultura. E-I.
“Triphora” pseudonovem spec. nov. E: holotipo, 7,3 mm (FLMNH); F: detalle de la abertura de un
paratipo (FLMNH); G: protoconcha; H: detalle de la protoconcha; I: detalle de la espira del holotipo.
139
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
"Triphora" abrupta (Dalí, 1881) (Figs. 23G-H, 36M)
Triforis (bigemma Watson varj abruptus Dalí, 1881. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoo/., 18: 84. [Type locality:
Yucatán Strait, 640 fms (1171 m)].
Triforis (Sychar) abrupta Dalí, 1881. In Dall, 1889. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 18: 249, pl. 20, fig. 12b.
lectotype (Figs. 23G, 23H) (MCZ 7389). The types in
Type material: A syntype, here designated as
USNM are lost (E. Strong, pers. comm.).
Description : See Dall (1881). The lec-
totype is a shell without protoconch and
aperture. The most important characters
are that spiral 1 is formed by small, less
prominent nodules; spirals 2 and 3 are
more prominent and almost equal, with
larger nodules. Below there is a small,
smooth spiral 4.
Dimensions : according to Dall (1881)
the shell measures 7.5 mm. The lecto-
type measures 7.9 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type material.
Remarks : The lectotype is probably
the same shell studied by Dall with the
loss of the external lip, with the same
size and sculpture. For this reason it is
considered as lectotype. No information
on protoconch and aperture are avail-
able, which makes any kind of compari-
son difficult. The placement in
"Triphora'' and not in Inella is tentative,
based on the rapidly enlarging whorls.
There are only a few species with
spiral 1 smaller, spirals 2 and 3 larger
and similar, and spiral 4 smooth:
Inella pompona and I. enopla have
shells lighter in colour, more elongated,
lacking spiral 1 on the first teleoconch
whorls, and with the space between the
main spirals more depressed.
Inella apexbilirata spec. nov. has a
smaller shell, narrower and almost
cylindrical in profile.
"Triphora" caracca Dall, 1927 (Figs. 23I-K)
Triphora caracca Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 93. [Type locality: Off Georgia, 440 fms (805 m)].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 231) and paralectotypes (Fig. 23J, 23K) (USNM 108343).
Description : See Dall (1927). Dark
brown paucispiral protoconch with at
least three whorls with two spiral cords.
No more details can be known because
of erosión. The most important differen-
tial character is that the axial ribs are
very fine and strongly prosocline.
Spirals 1 and 3 larger and prominent
from the beginning of the teleoconch,
with spiral 2 appearing about the tenth
whorl and remaining very small on the
final whorls.
Dimensions : The original description
gives a dimensión of 7.1 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type material.
Remarks: The shell mentioned by Dall
(1927) measured 8 mm, but the lectotype
examined from USNM only reached 7.1
mm, which could be due to the loss of one
whorl. No other triphorid in the Caribbean
has spiral 2 beginning on the tenth whorl
and remaining small and cióse to spiral 1
down to the end of the spire.
"Triphora" georgiana Dall, 1927 (Figs. 24A-E)
Triphora (Biforina) georgiana, Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M.r 70: 93 [Type locality: Off Georgia].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 24A) with 15 whorls and 5 paralectotypes (Figs.
24B-24E) (USNM 333516).
140
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 27. A-F. “Triphora” calva (Faber and Moolenbeek, 1991). A: shell, 3.7 mm, Key Largo,
Florida (CMK); B: protoconch of the previous shell; C: shell, 3.7 mm, Key Matias, Cuba
(MHNS); D: protoconch, Cienfuegos, Cuba (CFG); E: protoconch, Santa Lucia, Pinar del Río,
Cuba (CFG); F: protoconch, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); G: “ Triphora ” cf. calva, shell, 6.8 mm,
Grand Bahama Island (ANSP). H, I. “Triphora” yociusi spec. nov. H: holotype, 3.9 mm, off St.
Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida (FMNH); I: protoconch of the paratype.
Figura 27. A-F. “Triphora” calva (Faber and Moolenbeek, 1991). A: concha, 3,7 mm, Cayo Largo,
Florida (CMK); B: protoconcha de la concha anterior; C; concha, 3,7 mm. Cayo Matías, Cuba
(MHNS); D: protoconcha, Cienfuegos, Cuba ( CFG); E: protoconcha, Santa Lucia, Pinar del Río,
Cuba (CFG); F: protoconcha, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); G: “Triphora” cf. calva, concha, 6,8 mm,
Grand Bahama (ANSP). H, L. “Triphora” yociusi spec. nov. H: holotipo, 3,9 mm, fuera de St. Augus-
tine, St. Johns Co., Florida (FMNH); L: protoconcha del paratipo.
141
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Description: See Dall (1927). It is rele-
vant that the protoconch was described as
having a smooth nucleus and 2 more
whorls sculptured with two spiral threads
and numerous "flexuous axial threadlets".
Probably all the protoconchs are eroded,
so the exact form and sculpture could only
be known after the examination of fresh
shells. The teleoconch has spirals 2 and 3
from the beginning; later a very weak
spiral 1 appears below the suture, and
remains the smallest one up to the end.
Spiral 2 is the largest and most prominent.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
7.5 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type material.
Remarks : Marshall (1983) consid-
ered the genus Bif orina to be a synonym
of Monophorus Granata-Grillo, 1877. As
there is no information on the radula, it
seems better to keep it in "Triphora" in
sensu lato.
The shell designated as lectotype
had been separated from the rest of the
lot in a different capsule with the indica-
tion "type". This shell has the dimen-
sions and number of whorls given by
the author. Because no holotype was
mentioned in the original description,
this shell must be designated as lecto-
type.
This species shows some resem-
blance to Strobiligera brychia (Bouchet
and Guillemot, 1978) (Fig. 14F) in its
teleoconch whorls, but apparently the
protoconch of the latter species is more
pointed and has more whorls.
"Triphora" indígena Dall, 1927 (Figs. 24F-G)
Triphora indígena Dall, 1927. Proc. U. S. N. M., 70: 93. [Type locality: Off Georgia, 805 m].
Type material: Lectotype, here designated (Fig. 24F) with 13 whorls, and a paralectotype (Fig. 24G)
(USNM 108079).
Description : See Dall (1927). Proto-
conch multispiral, a little eroded on the
paralectotype but apparently brown
with two spiral cords. The teleoconch
begins with three almost similar
spirals, with spiral 1 becoming smaller
on subsequent whorls, appearing as a
small thread very cióse to the suture.
The cords and ribs are rather elevated,
and cross to form rectangular inter-
spaces.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures 6.6
mm.
Distribution: Georgia and Fernandina
(mentioned in the original description).
Remarks : Its most important charac-
ter is the formation of rectangular
spaces between cords and ribs. Spiral 1
is smaller throughout the spire, the
other two being similar to each other.
There are no similar species in the
study area.
"Triphora" lilacina (Dall, 1889) (Fig. 24H)
Triforis lilacina Dall, 1889. Bull. M. C. Z., 18: 243. [Type locality: Turtle Harbor, Florida, USA].
Type material: One syntype (Fig. 24H) here designated as lectotype (USNM 83087).
Description : See Dall (1889). The pro-
toconch is unknown. The most important
character is the uniform lilac colour; also,
the two spirals, with an additional very
narrow spiral only appearing between
them on the eleventh whorl. The nodules
are spherical and relatively small.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
8.5 mm.
Remarks: The lectotype does not have
exactly the characters mentioned in the
original description (it measures 8.5 mm
instead of 9.0 and has 15 whorls instead
of 18), but these differences may be the
142
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 28. A-D. “ Triphora ” guadaloupensis spec. nov. A-C: holotype, 2.3 mm, Guadaloupe (ANSP);
D: drawing of the protoconch. E-H. “Triphora” amicorum spec. nov. E, F: holotype, 4.4 mm,
Florida (FLMNH); G: paratype, 3.8 mm. Florida (FLMNH); H: protoconch of the holotype.
Figura 28. A-D. “Triphora” guadaloupensis spec. nov. A-C: holotipo, 2,3 mm, Guadalupe (ANSP);
D: dibujo de la protoconcha. E-H. “Triphora” amicorum spec. nov. E, F: holotipo, 4,4 mm, Florida
(FLMNH); G: paratipo , 3,8 mm. Florida (FLMNH); H: protoconcha del holotipo.
143
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
result of a quick examination or due the
loss of a small part of the shell (the loss
of the first whorls of the protoconch was
already mentioned in the original
description). In spite of this, the colour
is very characteristic and there is no
doubt that it is the type mentioned in
the original description. Besides, it is
necessary to point out that the shell has
a defect on the penultimate whorl,
which may cause a slight deformation.
The shells illustrated by some
authors under this ñame (Vokes and
Vokes, 1983) seem to be very different.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Mesophora novem (Nowell-Usticke,
1969) seems to be the closest species, but
has a different colour, larger and lighter
nodules, and a darker suture; spiral 2
does not appear until the final whorls
and is always smaller than the other
two, but it has larger nodules than those
on spiral 2 of "T." lilacina.
No shells resembling the type of this
taxon have been collected by any other
author in spite of the fact that it comes
from shallow water (11 m). Henee, some
malacologists (pers. comm.) have con-
sidered that this type could be an abnor-
mal individual from a population which
is usually differently coloured (which
we will mention below as "Triphora"
atlántica).
Another possibility is the one sug-
gested by several persons (pers. comm.):
if the lectotype is an abnormal shell with
an uncommon colour for the species, it
may be conspecific with shells from other
populations having different morpholog-
ical form and colour. One candidate for
this is presented below as "T." cf. lilacina.
"Triphora" cf. lilacina (Figs. 241-0)
Material examined: Florida: 1 s (Fig. 24J), 24° 50' N, Monroe Co., West Coast of Florida (Jun 1961)
(McGinty coll.) 61 m (FLMNH 259042); 6 s (Fig. 241) Pinellas Co., SSW John's Pass (Dan Steger) 55
m (FLMNH 238675); 1 s (Fig. 24L), Pickles Reef, off Key Largo, Monroe Co. (L. Hill, May/76), 7-10
m (CHL); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., Breakers Hotel to Biltmore Hotel (R/V Tritón, Apr 1951) (McGinty
coll.) 36-55 m (FLMNH 177402); 1 s, Monroe Co., off Dry Tortugas (R. Black, dec. 1990) 960 m
(FLMNH 279375); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., Boynton Beach, off Briny Breezes (R/V Tritón, Feb 1951)
(McGinty coll.) 50-60 fms (FLMNH 219907); 2 s, Collier Co., SW of John's Pass (Powlus and Steger,
May 1958) (McGinty coll.) 55 m (FLMNH 154900); 2 s, Collier Co., 150 miles W (J. Moore, Jun. 1962)
(M. Hunter coll.) Cape Romano, 450 m (FLMNH 129846); 1 s (Fig. 24K), Palm Beach Co., Bath and
Tennis Club to Palm Beach Pier (R/V Tritón, Apr. 1951) (McGinty coll.) 36-55 m (FLMNH 176649);
1 s, Palm Beach Co.(R/V Tritón, Apr. 1950) 40-50 m (FLMNH 204877).
Description: Shell (Figs. 24I-24L)
solid, elongated, light brown. Proto-
conch (Fig. 24N) multispiral, with about
4 whorls, the apex surface with small
tubercles and the subsequent whorls
with two spiral cordlets crossed by
numerous fine axial ribs that are slightly
S-shaped, especially on the last whorl.
Teleoconch with about 11-12 whorls,
beginning with spirals 1 and 3, crossed
by prosocline small axial ribs which
form nodules at the intersection points.
These two spirals continué on the subse-
quent whorls, the upper one with
slightly larger nodules; on about the
sixth-eighth whorl, a very small spiral 2
appears cióse to spiral 1; on the subse-
quent whorls, this spiral 2 enlarges
slightly until it is almost similar in size
to spiral 3, spiral 1 is always slightly
larger with larger nodules. On about the
tenth whorl an additional spiral cord
appears; this cord is smooth, always
smaller, and located just below the
lower suture, but on the final whorl it is
more obvious and beaded. Below it
there are two more spiral cords, the
upper one slightly nodulous and the
lower one smooth, located on the base
of the siphonal canal. Aperture
rounded-ovoid, columella curved,
siphonal canal elongate and recurved,
closed at its base by an extensión of the
aperture.
144
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-G ARCES: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 29. “ Triphora ” turtleb ay ensis spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 4.1 mm, Bermuda (FLMNH); C, D:
paratype, 4.2 mm (BMSM); E: protoconch of the holotype; F: detail of the protoconch of the
paratype; G: detail of the aperture and base.
Figura 29. “Triphora” turtlebayensis spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 4, 1 mm, Bermudas (FLMNH); C, D:
paratipo, 4,2 mm (BMSM); E: protoconcha del holotipo; F: detalle de la protoconcha del paratipo; G:
detalle de la abertura y de la base.
145
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
The colour is brown on the proto-
conch; light brown on the shell, spiral 1
having lighter nodules, more evident on
the last whorls.
Dimensions : The shells studied
measure between 4.0 and 9.0 mm.
Distribution: Only known from
Florida.
Remarles : The shells figured by
Abbott (1974) as T. lilacina may belong
to this taxon. If the present well defined
species is “T." lilacina , the only explana-
tion would be that the lectotype of that
taxon is an abnormally coloured shell, in
which case the synonymy would only
be acceptable if intergrades were found.
On the other hand, if additional exam-
ples of the typical lilac shells of
"Triphora" lilacina were collected in the
future, showing consistent differences
with the shells described here, then the
shells referred here as "Triphora" cf.
lilacina could be named as a different
species.
"Triphora" atlántica (E. A. Smith, 1890) (Figs. 25A-I)
Triforis atlántica E. A. Smith, 1890. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 18: 292, pl. 21, fig. 16.
Triphora lilacina Dalí, 1889. In Abbott, 1974: 112.
Type material: Lectotype, here designated, of Triforis atlántica (Fig. 25A) and several paralectotypes
(BMNH 89.10.1.1874-93).
Other material examined: USA: Florida: 1 s (Fig. 25B), W Egmont Key, Hillsborough Co. (Gulf of
México) Qim Moore /Cavalier, 1962), 76 m (CHL); 2 s, off Palm Beach (M. Glickstein, 1980) 82-105
m (CHL); 3 s (Figs. 25E-25G), 42 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co. (T. Yocius, 1979), 85 m (CHL);
2 s (Fig. 25E, G), 42 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co. (T. Yocius, Jul/1980), 36 m (CHL); 1 s, 50
miles S Carrabelle, Franklin Co. (J. Keeler, Feb/1986), 60 m (CHL); 2 s, W Marco, Collier Co. (J.
Moore / Cavalier, 1972) 55 m (CHL); 1 s, Monroe Co., West coast, 24° 50' N, 33 fms (FLMNH 259042);
3 s, Palm Beach Co. (D. Akers, 1970-1971) 30 m (FLMNH 127891); 1 s, Palm Beach Co., off Boynton
Inlet (D. and H. Akers, Sep. 1970) 36 m (FLMNH 228682). Louisiana: 2 s, off Louisiana, 26° 06.8'
66N 91° 02.418W (E.F. Garcia /Pelican, Jun/2001 57-65 m (CHL); 1 s, off extreme W Louisiana, 29°
45.9' N 13° 02.8' W, (E.F. Garcia /Pelican, Sept/98) 55-65 m (CHL); 1 s, off Louisiana, 28° 05.61N 91°
02.206' W (E.F. Garcia/ Pelican, Jun/2000), 58 m (CHL); Puerto Rico: 2 s. Rincón (L. Germaine,
Apr/1961) 30 m (FLMNH 163833). Brazil: 3 sp. (Figs. 25C, 25D) off Guarapari, Espiritu Santo State
(R. Bodart, 1994) 15-20 m (CHL).
Description: Shell (Figs. 25A-25H)
sharp-pointed, elongate, solid, with
bands of brown and white. Protoconch
multispiral (Fig. 251) with the apex retic-
ulated and 4 whorls with narrow axial
ribs that cross a single thread on the first
whorl and 2 elsewhere, except at the
end where there is only one. Teleoconch
with about 12-13 whorls, sometimes
more on large shells, beginning with
spirals 1 and 3, crossed by prosocline
axial ribs which form nodules at the
intersection points. These two spirals
continué on the subsequent whorls, the
upper one white and with slightly larger
nodules; on about the eighth-ninth
whorl, a very small spiral 2 appears
cióse to spiral 1; on the subsequent
whorls, this spiral 2 enlarges slightly
until it is almost similar in size to spiral
3, spiral 1 continuing to have larger,
more prominent white nodules. On
about the tenth-twelfth whorl an addi-
tional spiral cord appears; this cord is
only slightly nodulous, always smaller,
and located just below the lower suture,
but on the final whorl it is more
obvious, is located near the periphery
and has larger nodules. Below it there
are two more spiral cords, the upper one
slightly nodulous and the lower one
smooth, located on the base of the
siphonal canal. Aperture rounded-
ovoid, columella curved, siphonal canal
elongate and recurved, closed at its base
by an extensión of the aperture.
The colour is dark brown on the pro-
toconch; white on the first two teleo-
conch whorls, subsequently with white
nodules on spiral 1 and light brown in
146
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 30. A-F. “Triphora” grenadensis spec. nov. A-D: holotype, 3.2 mm, Grenada (ANSP); E, F:
protoconch of the holotype. G-I. “ Triphora ’ sp. 1, 3.3 mm, British Honduras (Belize) (ANSP).
Figura 30. A-F. “Triphora” grenadensis spec. nov. A-D: holotipo, 3,2 mm, Granada (ANSP); E, F:
protoconcha del holotipo. G-I. “Triphora” sp. 1, 3,5 mm, British Honduras (Belize) (ANSP).
147
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
the interspaces; the background colour
of spiral 2 is brownish, with the nodules
somewhat lighter. On some shells the
colour is similar but lighter throughout.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
6.0 mm. Some shells from the Caribbean
can reach up to 9.0 mm.
Distribution: It is known from Florida
to Brazil (not collected in Cuba). Other-
wise, St. Helena, in the middle of the
Atlantic is the type locality of T.
atlántica.
Remarks: This taxon is very confused,
and for many years it was considered by
some authors and collectors to be T.
lilacina. Yet the lectotype of T. lilacina is
uniform pink-lilac, spirals 1 and 3 are
well developed and spiral 2 never
reaches the size of the other two. The
nodules are the same colour as the shell
and are not lighter, and there are no dif-
ferences between the colour of spiral 1
and spiral 3. No intergrades between
these two morphs were found. Further-
more, the nodules are smaller and the
protoconch more sharply pointed with
tubercles on the apex. However, a defin-
itive conclusión can not be reached until
enough material of true "T." lilacina
becomes available for examination,
allowing a proper comparison and a
study of the animal and radula.
On the other hand, the taxon “T."
atlántica described by Smith from St.
Helena is a shell with constant brown
and white colouration and distribution
of the bands, and with nodules of
similar size. The location of the type
locality in the middle of the Atlantic is
not a problem for a species which has a
multispiral protoconch. The only
problem is that the protoconch of the
holotype is not known, but the eroded
protoconch of a paralectotype showed 2
spiral threads, which is compatible with
that of the present population. Therefore
we suggest that the shells studied from
the Caribbean belong to this taxon, the
only doubts being due to the lack of a
good protoconch from the St. Helena
material. Provisionally this species must
therefore be kept under this ñame,
awaiting the information that new mate-
rial will provide in the future.
It may be confused with Monophorus
ateralbus Rolán and Fernández-Garcés,
1994, but the latter species is smaller
and has a totally different colour
pattern, with the lower band white in
contrast to that of "T." atlántica, on
which the white spiral is always the
upper one. Triphora ellyae De Jong and
Coomans, 1988 is smaller and does not
reach 4 mm.
"Triphora" pyrrha Henderson and Bartsch, 1914 (Fig. 25J)
Triphoris pyrrha Henderson and Bartsch, 1914. Proc. U.S.N.M. 47: 413, pl. 2, f. 4 [Type locality:
Chincoteague, Virginia, USA],
Type material: A syntype (Fig. 25J) here designated as lectotype (USNM 252571).
Description : Henderson and
Bartsch (1914). The lectotype is a shell
in poor condition, white or cream in
colour, or possibly faded brown. The
protoconch is multispiral and has about
4 whorls but is very eroded, and further
details are impossible to discern. The
next 3 whorls have 2 spirals cióse
together; on the following whorls, these
cords 1-3 are more sepárate; subse-
quently a narrow spiral 2 appears in the
middle of the whorls; on the final whorl
spiral 2 is similar in size to the other
two. The siphonal canal is short and
open.
Dimensions : The lectotype measures
2.7 mm.
Distribution: Only known from its
type locality.
Remarks: Due to the lack of informa-
tion on the protoconch, the validity of
this species must be confirmed by the
examination of more material from the
type locality. It is somewhat similar to
Marshallora modesta or M. nigrocincta, but
is probably a valid species.
148
RoláN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 31. “Triphora” abacoensis spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 2.3 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (BMSM); C:
paratype, 2.25 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); D: protoconch of paratype, Abaco, Bahamas
(MHNS); E: protoconch of paratype, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); F: protoconch, Cienfuegos, Cuba
(MHNS); G: detail of the microsculpture of Figure E.
Figura 31. “Triphora” abacoensis spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 2,5 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (BMSM); C:
paratipo, 2.25 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); D: protoconcha de un paratipo. Abaco, Bahamas
(MHNS); E: protoconcha de un paratipo, Abaco, Bahamas ( CCR); F: protoconcha, Cienfuegos, Cuba
(MHNS); G: detalle de la microescultura de la Figura E.
149
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
"Triphora" inaudita spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 26A-D)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 26A) in FLMNH; paratype (Fig. 26B) in BMSM from 28° 05.61' N,
91° 02.205' W to 29° 05.524' N, 91° 02.086' W (E.F. García /Pelican 5/27/00) 58 m (both ex CHL).
Type locality: SW Dry Tortugas, Florida, USA 26° 42.9' N, 83° 43.20' W, 73.3-78.5 m.
Etymology: The specific ñame derives from the Latín word inauditus, which means "uncommon,
unheard-of", referring to some curious characters of the shell.
Description : Shell (Figs. 26A, 26B))
very distinctive, solid, elongate. Proto-
conch (Fig. 26C) with 3 and 1 /i whorls
with two spiral cords crossed by axial
ribs. Teleoconch (Fig. 26D) with three
spirals from the beginning, crossed by
slightly prosocline axial ribs and
forming nodules at the intersections.
Spiral 1 is very small on the first whorls
and is located very near to spiral 2;
spirals 2 and 3 are similar in size. On the
subsequent whorls, spiral 1 increases in
size until it reaches a size similar to
spiral 2 on about the tenth whorl, but is
still less prominent. Throughout the
shell spirals 1 and 2 are closer than
spirals 2 and 3. On the last whorl three
additional spirals appear towards the
base. Aperture ovoid, almost rhomboid,
with a short and open siphonal canal.
The colour is very characteristic: spiral 1
is mainly brown, with 1-2 white nodules
alternating with 1-3 brown ones; spiral 2
is mainly white, with only a small area
of brown on the lower part of some
nodules; on spiral 3 the brown colour
predominates, but white nodules appear
between two or more brown ones.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
5.4 mm and the paratype 4.4 mm.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks : Some of the characters of
"T. " inaudita are totally different from
any other species from the study area
and therefore it has been named in spite
of the scarcity of available material. The
colour pattern, the smaller spiral 1 and
the proximity of spirals 1 and 2 are the
most important differential characters.
The most similar species are:
"Triphora" cf. atlántica has two spirals
on the first whorls, the nodules of the
upper spiral are white and larger, while
the rest are brown.
Cosmotriphora arnoldoi Faber and
Moolenbeek, 1991 has uniform blotches
of brown on a white background, spiral
2 does not exist on the first whorls and
is smaller on the final ones.
Monophorus olivaceus has the lower-
most spiral totally white; this spiral is
larger on the first whorls, while spiral 2
is the smallest when it appear s. Spirals 1
and 2 ha ve only a few white nodules.
Nototriphora decorata (C. B. Adams,
1850) has three spirals similar and
equidistant throughout the shell, the
brown blotches are isolated on the
whorls against a white background.
"Triphora" pseudonovem spec. nov. Rolán and Femández-Garcés (Figs. 26E-I)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 26E) and 2 paratypes in FLMNH (193355).
Type locality: Barnegat Bay, Massachusetts, USA.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the similarity with Mesophora novem.
Description : Shell (Fig. 26E) subconi-
cal elongate, solid. Protoconch (Figs.
26G, 16H) with 3 l/i whorls and a diam-
eter of about 300 pm. The nucleus is
tuberculated and is followed by one
spiral thread crossed by numerous
slightly opisthocline axial ribs. Teleo-
conch with about 14 whorls, spirals 1
and 3 appearing beaded at the begin-
ning, with the ribs clearly prosocline; on
the subsequent whorls the spirals slowly
become more widely separated. The
nodules are large and spherical, of
similar size on both spirals, the upper
nodules connected to the lower ones by
well defined and slightly curved proso-
150
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 32. “ Triphora portoricensis spec. nov. A, B: holotype, 4.4 mm, Puerto Rico (FLMNH); C:
protoconch of the holotype; D: paratype, 1.8 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); E: protoconch of the
paratype.
Figura 32. “Triphora” portoricensis spec. nov. A, B: holotipo, 4,4 mm, Puerto Rico (FLMNH); C:
protoconcha del holotipo; D: paratipo, 1,8 mm, Abaco, Bahamas (CCR); E: protoconcha del paratipo.
cline axial ribs (Fig. 261). Spiral 2 appears
between the other two spirals on the
final two or three whorls; it is very fine
and is located very cióse to spiral 1, not
increasing immediately in size and
remaining clearly smaller than the other
two on the final whorl. Towards the base
there are three more nodulous spirals.
Aperture rounded, small, opened to the
siphonal canal, which is curved and a
little smaller in size than the height of
the aperture (Fig. 26F).
The entire shell is brown, with the
nodules a little lighter.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
7.3 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks : This species has some of
the characters of Mesophora novem, such
as spirals 1 and 3 separated throughout
most of the shell, but this new species is
brownish, whereas M. novem is tinged
with violet and has the first teleoconch
whorls white; another difference is the
slowly increasing size of spiral 2. The
protoconch has only one spiral thread
and it is shorter than that of M. novem.
151
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
"Triphora" calva Faber and Moolenbeek, 1991 (Figs. 27A-G)
Triphora calva Faber and Moolenbeek, 1991. Apex, 6(3/4): 82, figs. 3, 4. [Type locality: Key Bis-
cayne. Florida, USA].
Type material: Holotype not examined (ZMA 391003). Represented in the original description.
Material examined: Bahamas: 1 j (Fig. 27F), Treasure Cay, Abaco 26 40.12N 77 18.19W (CCR); 5 j,
North Sound, Bimini, mangrove (R. Robertson, 1957) (ANSP 329747); 3 s, Grand Bahama Island,
26° 31' 00"N, 78° 46' 30"W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 373944); 1 s (Fig. 27G) Bootle Bay, Grand Bahama
Island, 26° 39' 30"N, 078° 57' 00" (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 371845); 6 sp, North Hawksbill Creek, Grand
Bahama Island 26° 32' 00"N, 78° 45' 00"W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 370520); 1 sp, 7 s. Hotel, West End,
Grand Bahama Island 26° 42' 15"N, 78° 59' 50"W (J. Worsfold, Dec. 1981) (ANSP 368674); 1 s,
McLeans Town, Grand Bahama Island, 26° 38' 45"N, 77° 57' 30"W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 368484); 1
s, Hope Town Harbour, Abaco (R. Robertson, Jun. 1953) (ANSP 299409). Grand Cavman Island: 1
s, W of Prospect, SW Sound (A. J. Ostheiner) (ANSP 198925). Florida: 1 s, 1 f (Fig. 27A), Key Largo
(CMK); 1 sp, 1 s, Bonefish Key (Aug. 1957) (FLMNH UF368198). Cuba: 3 s, Caibarién, (FLMNH
UF365100); 1 f (Fig. 27D), Cienfuegos (CFG); 1 f, Jibacoa (MHNS); 1 f (Fig. 27E) Santa Lucia, Pinar
del Rio (CFG); 3 s, Batabanó (CFG); 1 s, Cabo Mafias, Canarreos (MHNS).
Description: Faber and Moolen-
beek (1991). The most important diag-
nostic characters are the following: the
shell is dark brown; the brown colour
may be uniform, sometimes with the
nodules lighter (Fig. 27C) and even
with spiral 1 on the last whorl with
white nodules (Fig. 27A). The proto-
conch (Figs. 27B, 27D, 27E, 27F) is
described as having only one smooth
whorl, but if the protoconch whorls are
counted by the Verduin (1977) method,
and the end of the protoconch is at the
point where the teleoconch begins with
two spirals, it actually has 2 whorls
(sometimes a little less); the first whorl
is smooth and there is a spiral cord at
the middle of the second one. In the
original description there is no Infor-
mation on the diameter of the proto-
conch. Based on the photograph of the
holotype it could be deduced that the
protoconch is about 275 pm in width;
in the material examined the diameter
is variable between 250 and 380 pm.
This and the brown colour are impor-
tant characters for differentiation from
other species.
Teleoconch sculpture begins with
spiral 3; spiral 1 and axial ribs appear on
the third whorl (the second whorl of the
teleoconch). Spiral 2 emerges on the
sixth whorl (the fifth of the teleoconch).
Also another smooth sutural spiral com-
mences on the 3th-4th whorl.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
5.0 mm. Some shells atributed to this
species can reach 9 mm.
Distribution : Known from several
areas of the Caribbean: Florida,
Bahamas, Cuba.
Remarks : In some works (e.g. Rolán
and Fernández-Garcés, 2007) this
species is assigned to the genus Marshal-
lora. In fact there is no information on
the radula and it is therefore better to
keep it in "Triphora" s. /.
Shells from Quintana Roo were
referred to in the original description
under "Other material studied" to be
this species; these shells were later
described as Marshallora nichupte by
Rolán and Crúz-Ábrego (1996). This
species can be differentiated from "T. "
calva by its more variable colour,
ranging from dark brown to white,
larger shell and wider protoconch, with
only 1 to 1 l/z whorls.
Below, several species are shown to
be different from "T." calva although
having a short protoconch as a common
feature.
The protoconch of this species has
been studied in shells from the Bahamas,
Florida and Cuba (Figs. 27B, 27D, 27E,
27F), all of which have a first whorl with
a similar diameter: 250, 270 pm and 260
pm respectively. Other similar characters
inelude a smooth apex and one spiral
cord on the second whorl.
152
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
One shell from the Bahamas (Fig.
27G) resembles "T." calva but is larger
(6.8 mm) and elongated (11 whorls), and
the protoconch has only one spiral
whorl instead of two. It may be a differ-
ent species or an abnormal individual.
"Triphora" yociusi spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 27F1, 1)
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 27H) deposited in FLMNH {ex CHL). Paratype (Fig. 271) in BMSM
from 67 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida (T. Yocius 1979) 54 m; both ex CHL.
Other material studied: 1 s (eroded), Bermuda (C. Abbott Davis) (ANSP 88722).
Type locality: 32 miles E St. Augustine, St. Johns Co., Florida (J. Dawley / Scallop 1982), 30 m.
Etymology: The species is named after Ted Yocius, the St. Augustine fisherman who dredged so
many of the triphorids from off northeast Florida, including the present species.
Description : Shell (Fig. 27H) subconi-
cal elongate, solid. Protoconch (Fig. 271)
paucispiral with 1 3 A whorls and a dia-
meter of about 370 pm. The nucleus and
most of the first whorl are smooth; near
the end of this whorl two spiral cords
appear. Teleoconch with about 8 whorls,
with spirals 1 and 3 nodulous at the
beginning. The nodules are large and
rounded, of similar size on both spirals,
the upper ones connected to the lower
by fine prosocline axial ribs. On about
the fifth whorl of the teleoconch spiral 2
appears between the other two, but
closer to spiral 1; it is very narro w, sub-
sequently increasing in size until the
three spirals are similar on the final
whorl. Aperture rounded, small and
open to the siphonal canal, which is half
the size of the aperture.
The entire shell is brown, but a
darker band covers spiral 1 and reaches
to the suture, the nodules on this spiral
being lighter than the background
colour; the nodules and the background
colour of spiral 3 are cream coloured, as
is spiral 2 on the last whorl.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
3.9 mm.
Distribution : Only known from type
locality and area cióse by.
Remarks : ''Triphora'' yociusi spec. nov.
has a wider protoconch than "T". calva,
with 1 3/ 4 whorls, and at the end of the
first protoconch whorl there are two
spirals, while in "T" . calva there is only
one. The teleoconch colour is lighter and
spiral 3 is cream colored, the shell is nar-
rower, the aperture relatively smaller
and the siphonal canal larger.
"Triphora" guadaloup ensis spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs.
28A-D)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 28A-28D) ANSP (313817). Two paratypes in the same lot (ANSP).
All from the type locality.
Type locality: Guadaloupe, NW of Pointe de Chateaux (Maes, Feb. 1962) 6-11 m.
Etymology: The species is named after the island where it was collected.
Description: Shell (Figs. 28A-D) very
small, ovoid, short, solid. Protoconch (Fig.
28D) paucispiral, white, with 2 whorls and
a diameter of about 280 pm. The nucleus
is smooth and almost vertical, followed
by a whorl with two spiral cords; on the
second whorl an additional smaller spiral
cord appears between the other two. The
white colour extends no further than the
protoconch, the beginning of the teleo-
conch being brown with two beaded
cords. Teleoconch with about 4 l/i whorls,
with spirals 1 and 3 nodulous at the be-
ginning. The nodules are large and
rounded, of similar size on both spirals,
the upper ones connected to the lower
ones by wide orthocline ribs. On the 3rd-
4th whorls, spiral 2 appears between the
other two and subsequently increases in
size, with the three spirals only becoming
153
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
similar on the final whorl at the end of the
spire. The base has three more spiral cords,
only the upper one being nodulous. Aper-
ture ovoid, closing the siphonal canal by
an extensión of the outer lip; an anal notch
is visible at the top of the lip.
The shell colour is brown, but the
nodules on spiral 3 are always whitish-
cream; the background of the spiral as well
as the nodules are of this color on the final
whorl, but the nodules are lighter.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
2.3 mm. Paratypes of similar size.
Distribution : Only known from
Guadaloupe, and probably endemic to
that island.
Remarles : This species, with two pro-
toconch whorls bearing 2 and 3 spiral
cords respectively, a very short shell
with lighter beads on spiral 1 and a
cream-colored spiral 3, is different from
any other in the study area.
" Triphora " amicorum spec. nov. Rolán and Fernández-Garcés (Figs. 28E-H)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 28E, 28F) and one paratype (Fig. 28G) in FLMNH (249812).
Type locality: Palm Beach Co., Lake Worth, North Inlet, Peanut Id., Florida, USA.
Etymology: The species is named after the several friends who contributed to this work with mate-
rial, information and advice, and those who also helped in other ways.
Description : Shell (Figs. 28E-28F)
elongate, solid. Protoconch (Fig. 28H)
with 2 3/ 4 whorls, the apex (nucleus and
first whorl) with numerous microscopic
tubercles, followed by crowded axial
ribs which begin below the suture; on
the next whorl, the tubercles are aligned
to form two threads, the upper one in
the middle of the whorl and the second,
a little larger and more prominent,
between the first one and the suture.
The axial ribs number about 40 per
whorl, narrow and very cióse, undulat-
ing in the shape of an open S. The teleo-
conch begins with spirals 1 and 3, with
spherical nodules that are larger on
spiral 1, and with slightly orthocline
axial ribs. Spiral 2 appears on the
seventh whorl and is narrower, equidis-
tant between the other two; it increases
in size on the following whorls. Three
more spirals on the base, the lowest one
cióse to the siphonal canal. The colour of
the shell is brown, with white nodules
on spiral 1. Aperture ovoid, opened to a
short siphonal canal.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
4.4 mm. The paratype is smaller.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarles: This species is different
from other Caribbean species of
Triphoridae because of its planktotrophic
but short protoconch. The shell may
ha ve some similarity with the following:
Marshallora modesta and M.
nigrocincta have larger shells, and both
protoconchs are different (see Figs. 8G,
8H), with more whorls and with the
upper spiral thread located above the
middle of the whorl.
Marshallora nichupte and "Triphora"
calva both have protoconchs that lack
axial sculpture.
Cheirodonta apexcrassum (Rolán and
Fernández-Garcés, 1994) has a proto-
conch with spiral cords but no axial ribs
(Fig. 34J).
" Triphora " turtleb ay ensis spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 29A-G)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 29A, 29B) in FLMNH ex CHL. Paratypes: in BMSM (1 s, Figs. 29C,
29D), USNM (1 s) and CHL (3 s). All from the type locality. Other paratypes: 4 s, Bermuda (A.
Haycock) (ANSP 105606).
Other material examined: 4 s eroded, Shelly Bay, Bermuda (ANSP 145963); 1 s eroded (labeled as
T. modesta), (A. J. Peñe) Bermuda (BMNH 1911.17.21.641-50).
Type locality: Off Turtle Bay, Bermuda.
Etymology: The specific ñame alludes to the ñame of the type locality.
154
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 33. A-D. “ Triphora ” sp. 2. A, B: shell, 4.6 mm, La Herradura, N of Cuba (MHNS); C:
detail of the spire; D: protoconch. E-H. “ Triphora ” sp. 3. E, F: shell, 3.8 mm, Miami, Florida
(FLMNH); G: protoconch; H: detail of the aperture.
Figura 33. A-D. “Triphora” sp. 2. A, B: concha, 4,6 mm, La Herradura, N de Cuba (MHNS); C:
detalle de la espira; D: protoconcha. E-H. “Triphora” sp. 3. E, F: concha, 5,8 mm, Miami, Florida
(FLMNH); G: protoconcha; H: detalle de la abertura.
155
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Description: Shell (Figs. 29A-29D)
ovoid elongate, solid. Protoconch (Figs.
29E, 29F) paucispiral, with two whorls
and a diameter of 300 pm on the first
whorl and 380 on the second. The
nucleus is smooth, the first whorl with
prominent opisthocline axial ribs
crossed at its end by 2 transient spiral
cords; on the second whorl these two
cords are well defined and the axial ribs
change, becoming prosocline and more
dense at the end. Spirals 1 and 3 are
present at the beginning of the teleo-
conch, with the lower spiral more
prominent. On the subsequent whorls
they become more widely separated,
and on about the fifth whorl spiral 2
appears between them. This smaller
spiral increases in size on the two final
whorls, bul spiral 1 continúes to have
slightly larger nodules. Suture deep.
Towards the base of the final whorl
there are three additional spirals that are
separated by numerous axial threads.
Aperture ovoid (Fig. 29G), columella
thickened at the base and outer lip
extended, closing off the opening of the
short, curved siphonal canal. The colour
is uniformly light brown.
Dimensions : The holotype measures 4.1
mm. Paratypes of similar or smaller size.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality.
Remarks : The differences of this
species with “T. " calva are the following:
"T. " turtlebayensis has a wider shell, the
protoconch is wider and has 2 whorls
with prominent axial and spiral sculp-
ture beginning on the first whorl, the
siphonal canal is closed and there are
numerous axial threads between the
basal cords.
There are other Caribbean species
with a similar shell but all of them have
different protoconchs: Cheirodonta apex-
crassum (Fig. 34J), Sagenotriphora
osclausum (Fig. 22D-22F) and Marshallora
modesta (Fig. 8G).
"Triphora" grenadensis spec. nov. Rolán and Lee (Figs. 30A-F)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 30A-30D) in ANSP (313668).
Type locality: Levera Beach, N end of Grenada (R.A. and V.O. Maes, 1966), on Caulerpa, 1-3 m.
Description : Shell (Figs. 30A-30D)
dark brown, somewhat darker on the
suture, relatively solid, pointed. Proto-
conch (Figs. 30E, 30F) paucispiral, with
a little more that 2 whorls and a diame-
ter of about 300 pm, the apex smooth,
the first protoconch whorl with a poorly
defined wide spiral cord just below the
periphery, crossed by rather well sepa-
rated axial ribs, opisthocline above the
spiral and prosocline below, forming an
angle in the middle. On the subsequent
whorl the spiral cord is well defined and
above it the axial ribs are almost ortho-
cline. Teleoconch with seven whorls
with two spiral beaded cords (spiral 1
and 3) on the first four whorls; on the
fifth, spiral 2 appears between the other
two but is smaller, the three spirals
being similar in size on the final whorls.
The aperture is rectangular, the siphonal
canal short and open; the border of the
outer lip is white.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
3.2 mm.
Distribution: Only known from the
type locality.
Renarks: This species is described
and named in spite of the scarcity of the
study material, due to the fact that it has
very distinct differences with all other
Caribbean species, probably being
endemic to Grenada.
Comparison must be made with the
species that have a similar shell and pro-
toconch:
“T. " calva has a similar shell, but the
protoconch is always smooth, lacking
any axial sculpture except for a spiral
elevation on the second whorl.
"T." turtlebayensis has a similar
protoconch but it is light brown in
colour, with two spiral cords located
on the upper middle of the whorl.
Furthermore the shell is a little more
slender, of a uniform light brown
156
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 34. A-D. “ Triphora ” sp. 4. Batabano, Cuba (MHNS); A: fragment; B: protoconch; C: pro-
toconch, SEM photograph; D: detail of the sculpture of the protoconch. E, F. “ Triphora ” sp. 5.
Protoconchs, Cienfuegos, Cuba (MHNS). G. “ Triphora” sp. 6. Protoconch, Cienfuegos, Cuba
(MHNS). H. “ Triphora ” sp. 7. Protoconch, Miskito Archipelago, Nicaragua (MHNS). I.
“Triphora” sp. 8. Witties Cape, Nicaragua (MHNS). J. Cheirodonta apexcrassum, Cuba (MHNS).
Figura 34. A-D. “Triphora” sp. 4. Batabanó, Cuba (MHNS); A: fragmento; B: protoconcha; C: proto-
concha, fotografía al MEB; D: detalle de la escultura de la protoconcha. E, F. “Triphora” sp. 5. Proto-
conchas, Cienfuegos, Cuba (MHNS). G. “Triphora” sp. 6. Protoconcha, Cienfuegos, Cuba (MHNS).
H. “Triphora” sp. 7. Protoconcha, Archipiélago Miskito, Nicaragua (MHNS). I. “Triphora” sp. 8.
Cabo Witties, Nicaragua (MHNS). J. Cheirodonta apexcrassum, Cuba (MHNS).
157
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
colour, the aperture is rounded with an
occlusion of the base of the siphonal
canal and lacks white colour on the
outer lip.
Other species with a similar shell but
different protoconch are mentioned in
the Remarles for "T." turtlebay ensis. The
comparison is valid for this species.
"Triphora" abaco ensis spec. nov. Rolán and Redfern (Figs. 31A-G)
" Triphora " sp. A. Redfern, 2001. Bahamian Seashells, p. 69, figs. 289 A, 289B.
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 31A, 31B) in BMSM (15499); paratypes; 1 j (Fig. 31C) beach drift,
Treasure Cove 26° 42' 00"N, 77° 18' 30"W, (CCR); 1 j (Figs 31E, 31G) Chub Rocks 26° 43' 55"N, 77°
13' 05"W 10 m (CCR), 1 j (Fig. 31D) from the type locality (MHNS); 1 s, 3 j from the type locality
(CCR); all of the above from Abaco, Bahamas. 1 paratype, Lucayan Waterway, off South End, Grand
Bahama Island, Bahamas 26° 31' 45"N, 78° 32' 45"W (J. Worsfold) (ANSP 369222).
Other material studied: 2 j, Cienfuegos, Cuba 30 m (CFG and MHNS).
Type locality: East of Chub Rocks, Abaco, Bahamas in 52 m, 26° 44' 00"N 77° 09' 00"W.
Etymology: The specific ñame refers to Abaco, the island in the Bahamas from which the holotype
was collected.
Description : See Redfern (2001).
Shell (Figs. 31A-31C) ovoid elongate,
brownish, solid. Protoconch (Figs. 31D-
31F) very distinctive, brown with a
darker suture, the nucleus almost verti-
cal and about 125 pm high, with a diam-
eter of 250 pm; in total, the protoconch
has a little more than 2 whorls; the
surface of the tip is irregularly rough-
ened but without tubercles; very strong
prosocline axial ribs appear immedi-
ately below the nucleus and extend
between the sutures to cover the entire
whorl; minute, irregular spiral lines are
visible under high magnification (Fig.
31G). Spirals 1 and 3 are present at the
beginning of the teleoconch, their
nodules connected by axial ribs; spiral 2
appears on the third whorl, with all
spirals being of similar size. The colour
is brown, with spiral 1 darker. The aper-
ture is not known, as the shells studied
are juveniles. Siphonal canal short.
Dimensions : The holotype, which is
juvenile, measures 2.5 mm.
Distribution : Known from the
Bahama Islands. One of the protoconchs
collected in Cuba (Fig. 31F), in spite of
being narrower, is probably of the same
species.
Remarles : The type material consists
of immature shells, but the protoconch
is so characteristic that it was finally
decided to describe the species and to
give it a ñame, as there is none similar
in the studied area.
There are no species in the
Caribbean having this kind of proto-
conch with strongly prosocline axial
ribs.
"Triphora" portoricensis spec. nov. Rolán and Redfern (Figs. 32A-E)
Iniforis sp. Redfern, 2001. Bahamian Seashells, p. 66, figs. 278A, 278B.
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 32A, 32B) (FLMNH UF363895). One paratype (Fig. 32D), f, east of
Chub Rocks, Abaco, Bahamas, 26° 44' 00"N, 77° 09' 00"W 52 m (CCR).
Type locality: Puerto Rico.
Etymology: The ñame derives from Puerto Rico, the island on which the holotype was found.
Description : Shell (Figs. 32A, 32B) has about 2 3A whorls and has a promi-
conical elongate, light brown, with the nent keel a little below the middle of the
apex white. The protoconch (Fig. 32C) whorl. Above and below this keel there
158
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 35. “ Triphora ” sp. 9. Key Matías, Los Canarreos Archipelago. S Cuba (MHNS).
Figura 35. “Triphora” sp. 9. Cayo Matías, Archipiélago de Los Canarreos. S Cuba (MHNS).
are narrow axial ribs, orthocline at the
beginning and slightly prosocline below.
The teleoconch has about 8 whorls, with
spirals 1 and 3 present at the beginning
and spiral 2 appearing on the third
whorl, smaller initially but immediately
enlarging until it is the same size as the
other two. On the last whorls, the three
spirals are similar but the lowermost is
more prominent, and a very small,
smooth spiral appears just on the
suture. On the base this spiral 4 is wider,
and three more smooth spiral cords
appear below. The aperture is ovoid, the
outer lip sharp, the columella curved,
the siphonal canal short and open.
Dimensions : The holotype measures
4.4 mm. The paratype is a juvenile.
Distribution : Only known from
Puerto Rico and the Bahamas.
Remarks : The paratype from the
Bahamas (Figs. 32D, 32E) differs slightly
from the holotype; for example the
spiral cord on the protoconch is more
prominent and, on the teleoconch, spiral
2 appears a little earlier, but these are
small differences, while the others char-
acters are similar. For this reason both
are considered to be the same species.
The protoconch of this species is
somewhat similar to those of some
species in the genus Iniforis, such as Ini-
foris immaculata Rolán and Fernández-
Garcés, 1993 and I. carmelae Rolán and
Fernández-Garcés, 1993, but those two
species are white and always have only
two spirals throughout the teleoconch,
with large nodules; that is very different
from the three spirals and small nodules
on most of the teleoconch of "T. " portori-
censis.
No other Caribbean species has this
kind of protoconch. The most similar are
those with a short protoconch that has
one spiral: "T. " turtlebay ensis spec. nov.
and “T. " grenadensis spec. nov., but they
have differences on the teleoconch and
also on the protoconch, where the axial
sculpture is present from the beginning
and crosses the spiral cord.
159
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
"Triphora" sp. 1 (Figs. 30G-I)
Material studied: British Honduras (now Belize): 2 s (Figs. 30G, 30H), Cangrejo Bay, 17° 51' 35"N,
88° 02' 55"W (R. Robertson, fuly 1961) (ANSP 282402).
Description: Shell (Figs. 30G, 30H)
elongate, narrow, solid and brown in
colour. Protoconch (Fig. 301) paucispiral,
with only two whorls, the upper one
apparently smooth, followed by another
whorl on which there are two very fine
spiral threads. The teleoconch begins
with spirals 1 and 3, which both have
nodules connected by orthocline axial
ribs. About the fifth whorl, spiral 2
appears between spirals 1 and 3, start-
ing very narrow but increasing in size
on the following whorls; on the body
whorl the size of the three spirals is
similar. On the lower part of the whorls,
very cióse to the suture, a very small,
smooth spiral can be seen. On the base,
this spiral is wider and below it there
are two more, the lowermost cióse to the
siphonal canal.
Dimensions : The studied shells
measure 3.5 mm.
Remarks : "T." calva has a wider shell,
the protoconch with only one cord on
the second whorl.
"T." turtlebayensis spec. nov. and "T."
grenadensis spec. nov. have axial ribs on
the protoconch.
"T." yociusi spec. nov. has a shell
with bands of colour; the protoconch is
wider and has only 1 3A whorls.
This species is undoubtedly a valid
endemic from Belize, but only two
shells have been studied, one of them
with the protoconch somewhat eroded,
the other decollated and in not very
good condition. It is therefore prefer-
able to keep this species without a
ñame, waiting for more material in the
future.
"Triphora" sp. 2 (Figs. 33A-D)
Material examined: 1 s and 1 protoconch. La Herradura, N of Cuba (MHNS).
Description : Shell (Figs. 33A, 33B)
cream, solid, ovoid elongate.
The apex of the protoconch is
broken, with the remaining three
whorls showing only one spiral cord.
The protoconch (Fig. 33D) of a juvenile
presumed to be the same species has 4
whorls, the apex with microscopic
tubercles and the following whorls
with one thread crossed by slightly
opisthocline axial ribs; on the subse-
quent whorls there are two spiral
threads. However, the protoconch of
the complete shell, although slightly
eroded, differs by having only one
spiral cord.
Teleoconch with nine whorls begin-
ning with two nodulous cords, the
nodules being large and spherical; on
about the seventh whorl a narrow spiral
thread appears between the other two,
located very cióse to spiral 1 and there-
fore very undulating (Fig. 33C); it
enlarges very slowly and only becomes
nodulous on the final whorl, the
nodules being smaller that those on
spiral 1; the nodules on spiral 3 decrease
in size on the final whorl; on the base
there are 4 more smooth cords. Aperture
rounded. Siphonal canal short and
open.
The colour is very characteristic:
uniform cream with only a small brown
spot between each nodule.
Dimensions : The shell studied mea-
sures 4.6 mm.
Remarks : The characters are very
typical and different from any other
species in the Caribbean. But only one
shell was found, and there is not even
any certainty that the protoconch is
from the same species, so the species
will not be named until more material
has been obtained.
160
ROLÁN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Figure 36. Original drawings of some triphorids. A: Triforis hebes (from WATSON, 1886); B: Tri-
foris bigemma (from WATSON, 1886); C: Triforis infinta (from WATSON, 1886); D: Triforis longis-
sima (from DALL, 1889); E: Triforis triserialis (from Dall, 1889); F: Triforis intermedia (from
Dall, 1889); G: Triforis inflata Watson var. ib ex (from Dall, 1889); H: Triforis torticula (from
Dall, 1889); I: Triforis colon (from DALL, 1889); J: Triforis bigemma var. hircus (from DALL,
1889); K: Triforis cylindrella (from Dall, 1889); L: Cerithiopsis abrupta (in DALL, 1889 not
Watson); M: Triforis abrupta (from DALL, 1889).
Figura 36. Dibujos original de algunos trifóridos. A: Triforis hebes (en WATSON, 1886); B: Triforis
bigemma (en WATSON, 1886); C: Triforis inflata (en WATSON, 1886); D: Triforis longissima (en
Dall, 1889); E: Triforis triserialis (en DALL, 1889); F: Triforis intermedia (en DALL, 1889); G: Tri-
foris inflata Watson var ibex (en Dall, 1889); H: Triforis torticula (en Dall, 1889); F. Triforis colon
(en Dall, 1889); J: Triforis bigemma var hircus (en Dall, 1889); K: Triforis cylindrella (en Dall,
1889); L: Cerithiopsis abrupta (en Dall, 1889 non Watson); M: Triforis abrupta (en DALL, 1889).
lól
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
"Triphora" sp. 3 (Figs. 33E-H)
Material examined: 1 s, 5.8 mm Miami, Florida (FLMNH UF363887).
Description : Shell (Figs. 33E, 33F) large,
cream coloured, darker at the suture and
on the base. Protoconch (Fig. 33G) with
three whorls, apex tuberculated, subse-
quently with 2 spiral threads crossed by
numerous axial ribs. Teleoconch with spi-
rals 1 and 3 at the beginning, spiral 2 ap-
pearing on about the fourth whorl; the spi-
ral cords and the axial ribs are relatively
narrow, forming prominent nodules at the
points of intersection. Two beaded cords
appear on the base, with another smooth
one below on the dorsum of the siphonal
canal. Aperture (Fig. 33H) rounded, the
outer lip a little everted and sharp; an ex-
tensión of the lip crosses the columella,
closing the beginning of the siphonal
canal. The siphon is relatively larger than
in most of the Caribbean species and is
initially wider.
Remarks: The present shell is very dif-
ferent from any other studied from the
Caribbean. With three protoconch whorls
it is assumed to have planktotrophic
development, and therefore it is strange
that no other example of this species has
appeared in the large quantity of mater-
ial studied. This suggests that the shell
may have incorrect collection data, and
henee it has not received a ñame and
awaits more informa tion in the fu ture.
Some similarity may be observed with
"T. " auffenbergi, but the shell of that species
is larger, has more whorls and a more
uniform color, the protoconch is narrower
at the apex and the siphonal canal is larger.
"Triphora" sp. 4 (Figs. 34A-D)
Material studied: Cuba: 10 f (Figs 34A-34D), Cienfuegos, Jibacoa and Batabanó (CFG).
Description : Shell whitish, elongate,
pupoid. Protoconch (Fig. 34C) with two
whorls, light brown in colour, with a
diameter of 235 pm and with a
microsculpture of small irregular tuber-
cles (Fig. 34D) on the first whorl, while
on the second there are two spiral threads
crossed by poorly defined axial ribs. The
teleoconch begins immediately with two
spiral cords crossed by orthocline axial
ribs; on the subsequent whorls spiral 2
appears, on the last whorl becoming of
similar size to the other spirals.
Distribution: The material studied con-
sists only of fragments from several local-
ities from the south of Cuba, and as the
material is not fresh, it is possible that it
could be from Quaternary deposits.
Remarks: No material good enough
for a correct description of this species
was collected.
Several characters differentiate this
species from most of the Caribbean
triphorids, such as having a short proto-
conch with small tubercles, and only fine
sculpture on the rest of the protoconch.
"T." calva has a protoconch wider
than the present species, lacking any mi-
crosculpture of tubercles or axial threads.
"T." grenadensis spec. nov. and "T."
turtlebay ensis spec. nov. have proto-
conchs with stronger axial sculpture
that begins at the apex.
"T. " amicorum spec. nov. has a proto-
conch with more than 2 whorls and
stronger spiral sculpture.
Triphora sp. 5 (Figs. 34E, F)
Material studied: 2 j, Cienfuegos, Cuba.
Description: The protoconchs (Figs. have between 2 and 2 l/i whorls, the
34E, 34F) of the two shells of this species first one with a diameter of about 222
162
ROLÁN AND FERNÁNDEZ- G ARCES: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
pm and the second about 250 pm; the
nucleus is smooth (if not eroded), and
there are numerous opisthocline axial
ribs on the first whorl, crossed by two
weak spiral cords that combine into one
on the second whorl.
Remarles : This kind of protoconch
suggests a planktotrophic development,
but with a shorter period of planktotro-
phy than the other species. It can be dif-
ferentiated from the previous species
(Triphora sp. 4) which has no thread on
the first whorl and two small ones on
the second protoconch whorl.
The most similar protoconchs are:
"T. " calva has a protoconch that lacks
any axial sculpture.
“T.” grenadensis spec. nov. and "T. " tur-
tlebayensis spec. nov. have protoconchs with
stronger but less crowded axial sculpture.
"T. " amicorum spec. nov. has a proto-
conch with more than 2 whorls, less
crowded axial sculpture and only one
spiral cord.
"Triphora" sp. 6 (Fig. 34G)
Material examined: 1 f, Cienfuegos, Cuba.
Remarles: This protoconch (Fig. 34G) Garcés, 1994, but the latter has a proto-
is slightly similar to that of Cheirodonta conch with beaded cords (Fig. 36J),
apexcrassum Rolán and Fernández- unlike those on this fragment.
"Triphora" sp. 7 (Fig. 34H)
Material studied: 1 fragment, Miskito Archipelago, Nicaragua (MHNS).
Remarles: This protoconch with only two one, but in this shell the whorls appear
whorls has two cords as on the previous scratched, and the apex is more depressed.
"Triphora" sp. 8 (Fig. 341)
Material studied: 1 f, Cabo Witties, Nicaragua (MHNS).
Remarles: This protoconch with only have two very different spirals cords,
two whorls has two cords as on the pre- the upper one being very weak and the
vious one, but in this case the whorls lower one stronger.
"Triphora" sp. 9 (Figs. 35A-C)
Material studied: 1 s. Canarreos, Cuba (MHNS).
Remarles: This shell is dark brown, between whorls 4 and 5. Protoconch
has spirals 1 and 3 at the beginning of short with only 1 1/i whorls, apparently
the teleoconch; spiral 2 appears smooth.
II. ERRONEOUS RECORDS, INVALID SPECIES OR SPECIES NOT INCLUDED IN THE STUDY
"Triphora" hebes Watson, 1880 (Fig. 36 A)
Triphora hebes Watson, 1880. Molí, of the Challenger expedition, 1886, p. 103; 1886, pl. 43, figs. 7a-d.
[Type locality: Tristan de Cunha, 230 m].
163
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Description : Watson (1880).
Remarles : This species was recorded
in the Caribbean by Pilsbry and
Aguayo (1933), but the original descrip-
tion and figure of Watson (1886) show a
shell with an unusual, short protoconch
of only one whorl and a pointed apex.
which is different from any other
species known in the area. Furthermore,
the type locality is an island in the south
Atlantic Ocean. This record must there-
fore be considered an error, confused
with another species with paucispiral
protoconch.
"Triphora" f ilata Dalí, 1889
Triforis (Sychar) inflata var .filata Dalí, 1889. Bull. M. C. Z., 18: 249. [Type locality: Station 136, near
Santa Cruz, 929 m],
Type material: No types in USNM (E. Strong, pers. comm.); it was not present in the material exam-
ined from other museums (ANSP, MCZ, etc.).
Remarles : This must be considered a was only mentioned as a variety,
nomen nudum because there is no without any explanation of the differ-
description (Dall, 1889: 249) and it enees.
Triforis barbadensis Coomans and Faber, 1984
Triforis barbadensis Coomans and Faber, 1984. Bulletin Zoologisch Museum. Studies on West
Indian Marine Molluscs, 2.
Remarles : The genus Triforis Deshayes,
1834, in spite of having been used for many
of the shells described and discussed
above, does not belong to the family
CONCLUSIONS
Species in this work
From the 68 taxa studied in the
present work, 30 were previously
known, 26 are described as new and 12
were not named or received a tentative
ñame due to the scarcity of study mater-
ial or the existence of doubts about their
determination. More than 3000 speci-
mens and shells ha ve been examined for
the present work, of which more than
600 are included in the material exam-
ined for the species here included.
New species in the Caribbean
Faber and Moolenbeek (1991), in
their Remarks in the original description
of Triphora calva , pointed out that "It is
quite a surprise to find an undescribed
species with such a characteristic shell
Triphoridae, but to Cerithiopsidae. For
this reason this species, although being
valid and present in the study area, is not
included in the family studied here.
in Florida". In the following years more
than 10 species were described as new
from the Caribbean, sometimes proving
to be abundant in areas such as the
Nichupté Lagoon in Quintana Roo,
Yucatán; also to be considered are the
numerous species described in the
present work, as well as those awaiting
more material before they can be fully
described and named.
Total number of Caribbean species
The previous work (Rolán and Fer-
nández-Garcés, 2007) constituted a
summary of several papers written in
recent years concerning the species
known from Cuba, with 33 species of
Triphoridae figured in colour. The
present work, complementary to that
164
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
paper, ineludes the study of 68 species,
as well as 3 which are invalid taxa for
the area or are not included in Triphori-
dae. Of those 68 species, only 2
(Monophorus olivaceus and Sagenotriphora
osclausum) had been mentioned in previ-
ous works by these authors, and are
now referred to with the addition of
new information. Therefore the total
number of species of this family in the
study area (Caribbean and adjacent
regions) exceeds one hundred, some of
them unnamed due to the scarcity of
available material and/or doubts about
their determination.
State of the art of the study of this
group in the Caribbean
In the last 30 years (1977 to the
present work) 21 new species of
triphorids have been described as new;
26 more are described and named in this
work, and 12 more species await
description in the future; a total of 59
species, which represents more than half
of the estimated one hundred species in
the area. All of which supports the
observation already made in Rolán
and Fernández-Garcés (2007) that this
group has not yet been completely
studied, in spite of the fact that more
than half of the valid species listed here
were only described in the last 30 years.
Distribution range
An important number of the studied
species are from deep water, and this
makes it difficult to know exactly their dis-
tribution range, due to the limited number
of samplings made and the shortage of
available information in other studies.
Undoubtedly some species do not have
an extended range and are probably
endemic to individual islands, due to their
non-planktotrophic development.
Endemic species
Out of approximately a hundred
species of Triphoridae known from the
Caribbean and adjacent areas, about half
have a protoconch of 3 whorls or less,
which represents for many of these a
short planktotrophic or non-plank-
totrophic larval development, and prob-
ably most of these are endemic to a
small area. This suggests that more new
species can probably be found in the fu-
ture after some of the islands have been
sampled in detail for the first time, thus
increasing the total number of species.
Generic assignment
A significant part of the studied
material consisted of dry shells collected
by oíd expeditions, therefore no infor-
mation on soft parts was available. Only
in a few cases could the radula be
studied from this dry material. For this
reason many of the studied species were
placed in Inella or in " Triphora " sensu
lato , because the radula is very impor-
tant for generic assignment. Future col-
lecting expeditions will probably result
in a complete revisión of these species,
at which time their correct generic
assignment will be made.
Apart of " Triphora sensu lato", at
least 15 genera are considered to be
present in the Caribbean area: Inella (25
species, some of them whithout a defini-
tive assignation), Metaxia (7), Marshallora
(6), Iniforis (5), Cheirodonta (4), Isotriphora
(3), Cosmotriphora (2), Monophorus (2),
Sagenotriphora (2), Aclophora (1), Eut-
riphora (1), Latitriphora (1), Mesophora (1),
Nototriphora (1), and Similiphora (1).
List of ñames for species of
Triphoridae recorded from the
Caribbean and adjacent areas
A list of taxa referred to the study
area was presented in Rolán and Fer-
nández-Garcés (2007). Some changes
were made in the present work and for
this reason it is necessary to revise it.
Henee, a new list is provided in Table I,
including information on distribution,
habitat, protoconch whorls and shell
colour.
The list includesl28 specific ñames,
some of which are not currently consid-
ered to be triphorids; 94 are considered
here as valid species (which with the
addition of the 11 mentioned without
ñame in the present work, raises the
number of specific taxa mentioned to
105); 27 are probably synonyms or
errors, and 8 are only known as fossils.
165
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Table I. List of taxa employed for the Caribbean and adjacent areas, with taxonomic status,
synonymy, and other information on the protoconch, range of distribution, depth and colour.
Abbreviations, B: shell more or less uniformly brown; BB: shell with brown bands of different
intensity; BW: shell brown with isolated white dots; BWB: shell brown and white, but without
bands; V: shell of variable colour; W: shell white; WBB: shell white with brown bands; DW: deep
water (more than 100 m); SW: shallow water; M: protoconch multispiral (3 whorls or more); P:
protoconch paucispiral (less than 3 whorls); R: reduced distribution (few records from small area);
U: poorly known because it is a deep water species; WI: wide distribution (several records).
Tabla I. Listado de taxones empleados para el Caribe in áreas adyacente, con su status taxonómico, sino-
minias e información sobre su protoconcha, distribución, profundidad y color. Abreviaturas, B: concha
casi toda marrón; BB: concha con bandas marrones de distinta intensidad; BW: concha marrón con
puntos blancos aislados; BWB: concha marrón y blanca, pero sin bandas; V: concha de color variable;
W: concha blanca; WBB: concha blanca con bandas marrones; DW: aguas pofundas (más de 100 m);
SW: aguas someras; M: protoconcha multiespiral (3 ó más vueltas); P: protoconcha pauciespiral ( menos
de 3 vueltas); R: distribución restringida (pocas citas en un área pequeña); U: escasamente conocida por
ser especie de aguas profundas; WI: amplia distribución ( varias citas).
166
RoláN AND FernáNDEZ-GarcÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
Table I. Continuatión.
Tabla I. Continuación.
167
Iberus, 26 (1), 2008
Table I. Continuatión.
Tabla I. Continuación.
168
ROLÁN AND FERNÁNDEZ-GARCÉS: New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank those persons who
facilitated the loan of material, pho-
tographs and information from
Museums: Gonzalo Giribet and Adam
Baldinger, Kenneth J. Boss from MCZ;
Jerry Harasewych and Ellen Strong, from
the USNM; Kathie Way and Roberto
Pórtela Miguez, for their help during our
time with the SYNTHESYS PROJECT in
BMNH; Paula Mikkelsen, James R. "Jay"
Cordeiro from AMNH; Gary Rosenberg
and Daniel L. Graf from ANSP; John
Slapcinsky, Kurt Auffenberg, Chelsey
Campbell, Gustav Paulay from FLMNH;
Marien Faber for his information on
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, C. B., 1850a. Description of supposed
new species of marine shells which inhabit
Jamaica. Contributions to Conchology, 1 (4):
56-68.
Adams, C. B., 1850b. Description of supposed
new species of marine shells which inhabit
Jamaica. Contributions to Conchology, 1 (7):
109-123.
Bouchet, P., 1985. Les Triphoridae de Méditer-
ranée et du proche Atlantique (Mollusca,
Gastropoda). Lavori S.I.M., 21: 5-58.
Bouchet, P., 1997. Nouvelles observations sur
la systématique des Triphoridae de Méditer-
ranée et du proche Atlantique. Bollettino Mala-
cologico, 31 (9-12): 205-220.
Bouchet, P. and Guillemot, H., 1978. The
Triphora perversa- complex in Western
Europe. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 44:
344-356.
Bouchet, P. and Warén, A., 1993. Revisión of
the Northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal
Mesogastropoda. Bollettino Malacologico, sup-
plemento 3: 579-840.
Clench, W. J. and Turner, R. D., 1950. The
Western Atlantic marine mollusks described
by C. B. Adams. Occasional Papers on Mollusks,
1 (15): 233-403.
Dall, W. H., 1881. Reports on the results of
dredging, under the supervisión of Alexan-
der Agassiz, in the Gulf of México, and in the
Caribbean Sea, 1877-79, by the United States
Coast Survey steamer "Blake", Lieutenant-
Commander C. D. Sigsbee, U. S. N., and
Commander J. R. Bartlett, U. S. N., com-
manding. XV. Preliminary report on the Mol-
lusca. Bulletin oftheMuseum ofComparative Zo-
ology, 9 (2): 33-144.
some material studied by him. We also
thank Angel Valdés of The Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County.
Jesús S. Troncoso from the Universi-
dad de Vigo, Department of Ecology, for
his authorization to use the photo-
graphic equipment; Jesús Méndez and
Inés Pazos for the SEM photographs
made in the Centro de Apoyo Científico
y Tecnológico a la Investigación
(CACTI) of the University of Vigo.
Harry G. Lee and Colin Redfern
shared with us some very valuable
material from their collections, and also
helped by reading the manuscript and
making many interesting observations
and comments.
Dall, W. H., 1889. Reports on the results of
dredging, under the supervisión of Alexan-
der Agassiz, in the Gulf of México (1877-78),
and in the Caribbean Sea, (1879-80), by the
United States Coast Survey steamer "Blake",
Lieutenant-Commander C. D. Sigsbee, U. S.
N., and Commander J. R. Bartlett, U. S. N.,
commanding. XXIX. Report on the Mollusca.
Part 2. Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Bulletin
ofthe Museum ofComparative Zoology, 18: 1-
492, pls. 10-40.
Dall, W. H., 1927. Small shells from dredgings
off the southeast coast of the United States
by the United States Fisheries Steamer "Al-
batross" in 1885 and 1886. Proceedings ofthe
United States National Museum, 70: 1-134.
De Jong, K. M. and Coomans, H. E., 1988. Ma-
rine gastropods from Curagao, Aruba and Bonaire.
E. J. Brill, Leiden, 261 pp.
Díaz Merlano, J. M, and Puyana Hegedus,
M., 1994. Moluscos del Caribe Colombiano, un
catálogo ilustrado. Fundación Natura/ Co-
ciencias/ Invernar, Bogotá. 291 pp, 74 pls.
Espinosa, J., Ortea, J. A., Fernández-Garcés,
R. and Moro, L. 2007. Adiciones a la fauna
de moluscos marinos de la península de Gua-
nahacabibes (I), con la descripción de nuevas
especies. Avicennia, 19: 63-88.
Faber, M. J. and Moolenbeek, R. G., 1991.
Two new shallow water triphorids and a
new ñame in Metaxia from Florida and the
West Indies. Apex, 6 (3-4): 81-85.
Fernandes, F. and Rolán, E., 1988. A familia
Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) no ar-
quipélago de Cabo Verde. Publicagoes Oca-
sionáis da Sociedade Portuguesa de Malacologia,
11: 17-32.
1 69
Iberus , 26 (1), 2008
Henderson, J. B. and Bartsch. P., 1914. Lit-
toral marine mollusks of Chincoteague Island,
Virginia. Proceedings ofthe United States Na-
tional Museum, 47: 411-421, pls. 13-14.
Laseron, C. F., 1958. The family Triphoridae
(Mollusca) from Northern Australia; also
Triphoridae from Christmas Islands (indian
Ocean). Australia Journal of Marine and Fres-
chwater Research, 9 (4): 569-658.
Leal, J. H., 1991. Marine Prosobranch Gastropods
from Oceanic Islands ojfBrazil. Universal Book
Services, Oegstgeest, 418 pp.
Linden, J. van der, 1998. The Metaxiinae
dredged by the CANCAP Expeditions, with
the new species Metaxia carinaplex and M.
haplax from the Cape Verde Islands (Gas-
tropoda, Heteropoda, Triphoridae). Basteria,
61 (4-6): 115-122.
Marshall, B. A., 1983. A revisión of the Recent
Triphoridae of Southern Australia (Mollusca:
Gastropoda). Records of the Australian Mu-
seum, Supplement 2: 1-119 pp.
Moolenbeek, R G. and Faber, M. ]., 1989. Two new
Triphora species from the West Indies (Gas-
tropoda; Triphoridae). Basteria, 53 (4-6): 77-80.
Morris, P. A., 1973. A field guide to shells ofthe Atlantic
and Gulf coasts and the West Indies. Houghton
Mifflin Company, Boston. 330, 76 pls.
Nowell-Usticke, G. W., 1959. A check list ofthe
marine shells ofS. Croix U.S. Virgin Islands zvith
random annotations. Lañe Press. Burlington. 90 pp.
Nowell-Usticke, G. W., 1971. A supplementary
listing of new shells (illustrated). Nowell-
Usticke. U.S.A. 31 pp.
Olsson, A. A. and Harbison, A., 1953. Pliocene
Mollusca of Southern Florida, with special ref-
erence to those from North Saint Petersburg.
Monographs ofthe Academy of Natural Sciences
of Philadelphia, 8: 1-457, 65 pls.
Redfern, C, 2001 Bahamian seashells, a thousand
species from Abaco, Bahamas. Bahamiansea-
shells.com, Inc., Boca Ratón, 280 pp, 124 pls.
Ríos, E., 1994. Seashells ofBrazil. Editora de Furg,
Rio Grande. 368 pp, 113 pls.
Rolán, E. and Crúz-Ábrego, F. M., 1996
"1995". A new triphorid species (Gastropoda,
Triphoridae) from Nichupté lagoon, Yucatán
peninsula, México. Iberus, 13 (2): 87-92.
Rolán, E. and Espinosa, J., 1994. The family
Triphoridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Proso-
branchia) in Cuba 3. The genus Isotriphora,
with description of a new species. Basteria, 58
(1-2): 63-68.
Rolán, E. and Fernández-Garcés, R., 1993a
"1992". La familia Triphoridae (Mollusca:
Gastropoda) en la isla de Cuba, 1. El género
Metaxia Monterosato, 1884. Bollettino Mala-
cologico, 28 (5-12): 169-176.
Rolán, E. and Fernández-Garcés, R., 1993b.
The family Triphoridae (Mollusca, Gas-
tropoda) in Cuba. 2. The genus Iniforis
Jousseaume, 1884. Apex, 8 (3): 95-106.
Rolán, E. and Fernández-Garcés, R., 1994.
The family Triphoridae (Mollusca, Gas-
tropoda) in Cuba. 4. The genera Monophorus,
Nototriphora, Cosmotriphora and Cheirodonta,
with the description of three new species.
Apex, 9 (1): 17-27.
Rolán, E. and Fernández-Garcés, R., 1995.
The family Triphoridae (Mollusca, Gas-
tropoda) in Cuba. 5. The genera Marshallora,
Mesophora, Similiphora, Eutriphora, Latitriphora,
Aclophora and other species without generic
affiliation. Apex, 10 (1): 9-24.
Rolán, E. and Fernández-Garcés, R., 2007.
Caribbean Triphoridae (Gastropoda,
Triphoroidea): list and colour illustrations.
Neptúnea, 6 (3): 13-24.
Rolán, E. and Luque, A. A. 1999. Two new
species of triphorids (Gastropoda, Triphori-
dae) from the Miskitos Archipelago,
Nicaragua. Iberus, 17 (1): 107-113.
Rolán, E. and Peñas, A., 2001. Two new
species of the genus Monophorus (Gastropoda,
Triphoridae) in the east Atlantic and Mediter-
ranean Sea. Iberus, 19 (2): 31-40.
Rolán, E. and Redfern, C., 1996. Variabili-
dad de la protoconcha de Metaxia rugulosa (C.
B. Adams, 1850) (Gastropoda; Triphoridae).
Noticiario SEM, 26: 27-29.
Rosenberg, G., 2005. Malacolog 4.1: A data-
base of Western Atlantic marine Mollusca.
[WWW database (versión 4.1.0)] URL
http: / / www.malacolog.org.
Simone, L. R. L., 2006. A new Triphoridae from
Canopus Bank, N. E. Brazil (Caenogas-
tropoda). Strombus, 13 (1): 6-8.
Verduin, A., 1976. On the systematics of recent
Rissoa of the subgenus Turboella Gray, 1847,
from the Mediterranean and European At-
lantic coasts. Basteria, 40: 21-73.
Vokes, H. E. AND Vokes, E. H., 1983. Distribu-
tion of shallow-water marine Mollusca, Yu-
catán Peninsula, México. Mesoamerican Ecol-
ogy Institute, Monograph 1. Middle American Re-
search Institute, publ. 54. 183 pp.
Warmke, G. L. and Abbott, R. T., 1961.
Caribbean seashells. Livingston Publishing Co.
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania. 348 pp., 43 pls.
Watson, R. B„ 1980. Mollusca of H. M. S. Chal-
lenger Expedition. Journal ofthe Linnean So-
ciety ofEondon, 15: 87-126.
Watson R. B., 1886. Report on the Scaphopoda
and Gasteropoda collected by HMS Chal-
lenger during the years 1873-1876. Reports of
the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S.
"Challenger" ,Zoology, 15 (part 42): 1-756.
Wells, 1998. Superfamily Triphoroidea. Pp.
808-811 In Beesley, P.L., Ross, G.J.B. and
Wells, A. (eds). Mollusca: The Southern Syn-
thesis. Fauna of Australia vol. 5. CSIRO Pub-
lications: Melbourne, Part B viii 565-1234
pp.
170
NORMAS DE PUBLICACIÓN
• La revista Iberus publica artículos de fondo, notas y monografías que versen sobre cualquiera de los aspectos relacio-
nados con la Malacología. Se entiende por artículo un trabajo de investigación de más de 5 páginas de texto, meca-
nografiadas, incluidas láminas, gráficos y tablas. Las notas son trabajos de menor extensión. Las monografías son tra-
bajos sobre un tema único, de extensión superior a las 50 páginas de la revista y que serán publicadas como un suple-
mento de Iberus. Los autores interesados en publicar monografías deberán ponerse previamente en contacto con el
Editor de Publicaciones. Se entiende que el contenido de los manuscritos no ha sido publicado, ni se publicará en
otra parte ni en su totalidad ni resumido.
• Los manuscritos, así como toda la correspondencia relacionada con los mismos, deberán ser remitidos a: Serge Gofas,
Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n,
29071, Málaga, España.
• El texto del trabajo podrá estar redactado en cualquier lengua culta moderna.
• En los trabajos que superen las 20 páginas, cada página de exceso será abonada por el(los) autor(es) a precio de coste.
• Los artículos, notas y monografías deberán presentarse mecanografiados sobre DIN A-4, por una sola cara a doble
espacio (incluyendo referencias, pies de figura y tablas), con al menos 3 centímetros de margen por cada lado. Los tra-
bajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias), y se incluirá una versión en disco flexible (diskette), utili-
zando procesadores de texto en sus versiones de DOS o Macintosh. En caso de autoría compartida, uno de los auto-
res deberá hacerse responsable de toda la correspondencia.
• Junto con el trabajo debe incluirse una lista de al menos 4 posibles revisores del mismo, sin perjuicio de los que el
propio Editor considere oportunos.
• Los manuscritos se presentarán de acuerdo al siguiente esquema:
Primera página. Deberá incluir un título conciso, pero sugerente del contenido del trabajo, así como una traducción
al inglés del mismo (si el artículo no está escrito en inglés). Cuando sea preciso, deberá incluir referencia a familia o
táxones superiores. A continuación figurarán, por este orden, el nombre y apellidos completos del autor o autores,
las direcciones completas de los mismos, y un resumen del trabajo y su traducción al inglés. Dicho resumen deberá
sintetizar, en conjunción con el título, tanto los resultados como las conclusiones del artículo; se sugiere una exten-
sión de 100 a 200 palabras. El resumen deberá estar seguido de una lista de palabras clave, también con su versión
inglesa para su inclusión en los bancos de datos internacionales.
Páginas siguientes. Incluirán el resto del artículo, que debe dividirse en secciones precedidas por breves encabeza-
mientos. Siempre que sea posible, se recomienda seguir el siguiente esquema: Introducción, Material y métodos,
Resultados, Discusión, Conclusiones, Agradecimientos y Bibliografía. Si se emplean abreviaturas no habituales en
el texto, deberán indicarse tras el apartado de Material y Métodos.
• Las notas breves deberán presentarse de la misma forma, pero sin resumen.
• Deberán evitarse notas a pie de página y referencias cruzadas. Deberán respetarse estrictamente los Códigos
Internacionales de Nomenclatura Zoológica y Botánica (últimas ediciones). Cuando un táxon aparezca por primera
vez deberá citarse su autor y fecha de su descripción. En el caso de artículos sistemáticos, cuando se den las sinonimias
de los táxones, éstas deberán citarse COMPLETAS, incluyendo en forma abreviada la publicación donde fueron des-
critas, y la localidad tipo si es conocida entre corchetes, según el siguiente esquema (préstese especial cuidado a la pun-
tuación):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Sinonimias
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. H. N. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Localidad tipo: Marsella].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop. Car., 10: 275.
Dichas referencias no deberán incluirse en la lista de Bibliografía si es la única vez que se nombran en el texto.
Si se incluyen una lista completa de referencias de un taxon inmediatamente tras éste, deberá seguirse el mismo esque-
ma (sin incluir en Bibliografía las referencias que no se mencionen en otro lugar del texto).
• Sólo los nombres en latín y los de táxones genéricos y específicos deberán llevar subrayado sencillo o preferentemente
ir en cursiva. En ningún caso deberá escribirse una palabra totalmente en letras mayúsculas, ni siquiera el Título. Las
unidades a utilizar deberán pertenecer al Sistema Métrico Decimal, junto con sus correctas abreviaturas. En artículos
escritos en castellano, en los números decimales sepárese la parte entera de la decimal por una coma inferior (,),
NUNCA por un punto (.) o coma superior (’).
• Las referencias bibliográficas irán en el texto con minúsculas o versalitas: Fretter y Graham (1962) o Fretter Y
GRAHAM (1962). Si son más de dos autores se deberán citar todos la primera vez que aparecen en el texto [Smith,
Jones y Brown (1970)] empleándose et al. las siguientes veces [Smith et al. (1970)]. Si un autor ha publicado más de
un trabajo en un año se citarán con letras: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). No deberá emplearse op. cit. La lista de refe-
rencias deberá incluir todas las citas del texto y sólo éstas, ordenadas alfabéticamente. Se citarán los nombres de todos
los autores de cada referencia, sea cual sea su número. Los nombres de los autores deberán escribirse, en letras minús-
culas o VERSALITAS. No deberán incluirse referencias a autores cuando éstos aparezcan en el texto exclusivamente
como autoridades de un taxon. Los nombres de las publicaciones periódicas deberán aparecer COMPLETOS, no
abreviados. Cuando se citen libros, dése el título, editor, lugar de publicación, na de edición si no es la primera y
número total de páginas. Deberán evitarse referencias a Tesis Doctorales u otros documentos inéditos de difícil con-
sulta. Síganse los siguientes ejemplos (préstese atención a la puntuación):
Fretter, V. y Graham, A., 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder, W. F., 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. En Ponder, W. F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny, Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros, J., 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas.
Miscelánea Zoolgica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Las gráficas e ilustraciones deberán ser originales y presentarse sobre papel vegetal o similar, con tinta china negra y
ajustadas al formato de caja de la revista o proporcional a éste. Este formato es de 57 mm (una columna) o 121 mm
(dos) de anchura y hasta 196 mm de altura, si bien se recomienda utilizar el formato a dos columnas. En caso de pre-
parar figuras para que ocupen el total de una página, se ruega ajustar su tamaño para que puedan caber los pies de
figura bajo ella. Si han de incluirse gráficas de ordenador, deberán imprimirse con impresora láser sobre papel de
buena calidad. Las fotografías, bien contrastadas y sin retocar, deberán ajustarse siempre a los tamaños mencionados.
Al componer fotografías sobre una hoja, procúrese que los espacios entre ellas sean regulares y que estén debidamente
alineadas. Téngase en cuenta que incluir fotografías de distinto contraste en una misma página conlleva una pobre
reproducción final. Las escalas de dibujos y fotografías deberán ser gráficas, y las unidades que se utilicen del sistema
métrico decimal. Considérese la reducción que será necesaria a la hora de decidir el tamaño de las escalas o letras en
las figuras, que no deberán bajar de los 2 mm. En figuras compuestas, cada parte deberá etiquetarse con letras mayús-
culas, el resto de las letras deberán ser minúsculas. No deberán hacerse referencias a los aumentos de una determi-
nada ilustración, ya que éstos cambian con la reducción, por lo que debe emplearse una escala gráfica. En su caso, se
recomienda la utilización de mapas con proyección UTM. Cada figura, gráfica o ilustración deberá presentarse en
hojas separadas y con numeración arábiga (1, 2, 3,...), sin separar “Figuras” y “Láminas”. Los pies de figura, en una
hoja aparte, deberán acompañarse de su traducción al inglés (o español si el inglés es la lengua del trabajo). Utilícese
el esquema siguiente:
Figura 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal desplazándose; B: detalle de un rinóforo; C: branquia.
Las abreviaturas empleadas en las ilustraciones deberán incluirse en la hoja de pies de figura.
Los autores interesados en incluir láminas en color deberán abonarlas a precio de coste (200 € por página). Por lo
demás, deberán ajustarse a los mismos requisitos que los indicados para las figuras.
Si se pretende enviar gráficas o ilustraciones en formato digital es IMPRESCINDIBLE contactar previamente con el
Editor
• Las Tablas se presentarán en hojas separadas, siempre con numeración romana (I, II, III,...). Las leyendas se inclui-
rán en una hoja aparte acompañándose de una traducción al inglés. Deberán evitarse las tablas particularmente com-
plejas. Se recomienda reducir el número y extensión de ilustraciones, láminas o tablas al mínimo necesario.
• Los artículos que no se ajusten a las normas de publicación serán devueltos al autor con las indicaciones de los cam-
bios necesarios.
• El Comité Editorial comunicará al autor responsable del trabajo la fecha de recepción del trabajo y la fecha de envío
a revisión. Cada original recibido será sometido a revisión por al menos dos investigadores. El Comité Editorial, a la
vista de los informes de los revisores decidirá sobre la aceptación o no de cada manuscrito. El autor recibirá en cada
caso copia de los comentarios de los revisores sobre su artículo. En caso de aceptación, el mismo Comité Editorial, si
lo considera conveniente, podrá solicitar a los autores otras modificaciones que considere oportunas. Si el trabajo es
aceptado, el autor deberá enviar una copia impresa del mismo corregida, acompañada por una versión en disco flexi-
ble (diskette), utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones de DOS o Macintosh. La fecha de aceptación figura-
rá en el artículo publicado.
• Las pruebas de imprenta serán enviadas al autor responsable, EXCLUSIVAMENTE para la corrección de erratas, y
deberán ser devueltas en un plazo máximo de 1 5 días. Se recomienda prestar especial atención en la corrección de las
pruebas.
• De cada trabajo se entregarán gratuitamente 50 separatas. Aquellos autores que deseen un número mayor, deberán
hacerlo constar al devolver las pruebas de imprenta, y NUNCA POSTERIORMENTE. El coste de las separatas adi-
cionales será cargado al autor.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
• Iberus publishes research papers, notes and monographs devoted to the various aspects of Malacology. Papers are
manuscripts of more than 5 typed pages, including figures and tables. Notes are shorter papers. Monographs should
exceed 50 pages of the final periodical, and will be published as Supplements. Authors wishing to publish monographs
should contact the Editor. Manuscripts are considered on the understanding that their contents have not appeared or
will not appeared, elsewhere in substantially the same or any abbreviated form.
• Manuscripts and correspondence regarding editorial matters must be sent to: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones,
Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
• Manuscripts may be written in any modern language.
• When a paper exceeds 20 pages, extra pages will be charged to the author(s) at full cost.
• Manuscripts must be typed double spaced (including the references, figure captions and tables) on one side on A-4
(297x210 mm) with margins of at least 3 cm. An original and two copies must be submitted, together with a floppy
disk containing the árdele written with a DOS or Macintosh word processor. When a paper has joint authorship, one
author must accept responsability for all correspondence.
• The authors must inelude a list of at least 4 possible referees; the Editor can choose any others if appropriate.
• Papers should conform the following layout:
First page. This must inelude a concise but informative title, with mention of family of higher taxon when appropri-
atte, and its Spanish translation. It will be followed by all authors’ ñames and surnames, their full adress(es), an
abstract (and its Spanish translation) not exceeding 200 words which summarizes not only contents but results and
conclusions, and a list of Key Words (and their Spanish translation) under which the árdele should be indexed.
Following pages. These should contení the rest of the paper, divided into sections under short headings. Whenever
possible the text should be arranged as follows: Introduction, Material and methods, Results, Discussion,
Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Unusual abbreviations used in the text must be grouped in one
alphabetic sequence after the Material and methods section.
• Notes should follow the same layout, without the abstract.
• Footnotes and cross-references must be avoided. The International Codes of Zoological and Botanical
Nomenclature must be strictly followed. The first mention in the text of any taxon must be followed by its authori-
ty including the year. In systematic papers, when synonyms of a taxon are given, they must be cited IN FULL, includ-
ing the periodical, in an abbreviate form, where they were described, and the type localities in square brackets when
known. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1 804)
Synonyms
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. H. N. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Type locality: Marseille].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop. Car., 10: 275.
These references must not be included in the Bibliography list, except if referred to elsewhere in the text. If a full list
of references of the taxon is to be given immediately below it, the same layout should be followed (also excluding those
nowhere else cited from the Bibliography list).
Only Latín words and ñames of genera and species should be underlined once or be given in italics. No word must
be written in UPPER CASE LETTERS. SI units are to be used, together with their appropriate symbols. In Spanish
manuscripts, decimal numbers must be separated with a comma (,), NEVER with a point (.) or upper comma (‘).
• References in the text should be written in small letters or SMALL CAPITALS: Fretter and Graham (1962) or FRETTER
AND GRAHAM (1962). The first mention in the text of a paper with more than two authors must inelude all of them
[Smith, Jones & Brown (1970)], thereafter use et al. [Smith et al. (1970)]. If an author has published more than one
paper per year, refer to them with letters: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). Avoid op. cit.
The references in the reference list should be in alphabetical order and inelude all the publications cited in the text
but only these. ALL the authors of a paper must be included. These should be written in small letters or SMALL CAP-
ITALS. The references need not be cited when the author and date are given only as authority for a taxonomic ñame.
Tifies of periodicals must be given IN FULL, not abbreviated. For books, give the title, ñame of publisher, place of
publication, indication of edition if not the first and total number of pages. Keep references to doctoral theses or any
other unpublished documents to an absolute mínimum. See the following examples (please note the punctuation):
Fretter, V. and Graham, A., 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder, W. F., 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. In Ponder, W. F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny, Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros, J., 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas.
Miscelánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Figures must be original, in Indian ink on draughtsman’s tracing paper. Keep in mind page format and column size
when designing figures. These should be one column (57 mm) or two columns (121 mm) wide and up 196 mm high,
or be proportional to these sizes. Two columns format is recomended. It is desirable to print figures with their legend
below, so authors are asked to take this into account when preparing full page figures. If Computer generated graph-
ics are to be included, they must be printed on high quality white paper with a láser printer. Photographs must be of
good contrast, and should be submitted in the final size. When mounting photographs in a block, ensure spacers are
of uniform width. Remember that grouping photographs of varied contrast results in poor reproduction. Take
account of necessary reduction in lettering drawings; final lettering must be at least 2 mm high. In composite draw-
ings, each figure should be given a capital letter; additional lettering should be in lower-case letters. A scale line is
recomended to indícate size, magnification ratio must be avoided as it may be changed during printing. UTM maps
are to be used if necessary. Figures must be submitted on sepárate sheets, and numbered with consecutive Arabic num-
bers (1, 2, 3,...), without separating ‘Plates’ and ‘Figures’. Legends for Figures must be typed in numerical order on
a sepárate sheet, and an Spanish translation must be included. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Figure 1 . Neodoris carvi. A: animal crawling; B: rinophore; C: gills.
If abbreviations are to be used in illustrations, group them alphabetically after the Legends for Figures section.
Authors wishing to publish illustrations in colour will be charged with additional costs (200 € per page). They should
be submitted in the same way that black and white prints.
If the authors want to send Figures in digital format, CONTACT the Editor first.
• Tables must be numbered with Román numbers (I, II, III,...) and each typed on a sepárate sheet. Headings should
be typed on a sepárate sheet, together with their English translation. Complex tables should be avoided. As a general
rule, keep the number and extensión of illustrations and tables as reduced as possible.
• Manuscripts that do not conform to these instructions will be returned for correction before reviewing.
• Authors submitting manuscripts will receive an acknowledgement of receipt, including receipt date, and the date
the manuscript was sent for reviewing. Each manuscript will be critically evaluated by at least two referees. Based of
these evaluations, the Editorial Board will decide on acceptance or rejection. Anyway, authors will receive a copy of
the referees’ comments. If a manuscript is accepted, the Editorial Board may indícate additional changes if desirable.
Acceptable manuscripts will be returned to the author for consideration of comments and criticism; a finalized man-
uscript must then be returned to the Editor, together with a floppy disk containing the article written with a DOS or
Macintosh word processor. Dates of reception and acceptance of the manuscript will appear in all published articles.
• Proofs will be sent to the author for correcting errors. At this stage no stylistic changes will be accepted. Pay special
attention to references and their dates in the text and the Bibliography section, and also to numbers of Figures and
Tables appearing in the text.
• Fifty reprints per article will be supplied free of charge. Additional reprints must be ordered when the page proofs
are returned, and will be charged at cost. NO LATER orders will be accepted.
La Sociedad Española de Malacología
Junta Directiva desde el 11 de octubre de 2005
Presidente José Templado González
Vicepresidente Emilio Rolán Mosquera
Secretaria María Carmen Salas Casanovas
Tesorero Luis Murillo Guillén
Editor de Publicaciones Serge Gofas
Bibliotecario Rafael Araujo Armero
Vocales Ramón M. Alvarez Halcón
Benjamín Gómez Moliner
Alberto Martínez Ortí
Diego Moreno Lampreave
José Ramón Arrébola Burgos
La Sociedad Española de Malacología se fundó el 21 de agosto de 1980. La sociedad se registró como una aso-
ciación sin ánimo de lucro en Madrid (Registro N° 4053) con unos estatutos que fueron aprobados el 12 de
diciembre de 1980. Esta sociedad se constituye con el fin de fomentar y difundir los estudios malacológicos
mediante reuniones y publicaciones. A esta sociedad puede pertenecer cualquier .persona o institución interesada
en el estudio de los moluscos.
SEDE SOCIAL: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, d José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, España.
Cuotas para 2008:
INSCRIPCIÓN: 6 euros, además de la cuota correspondiente.
A los socios residentes en España se les aconseja domiciliar su cuota. Todos los abonos deberán enviarse al
Tesorero (dirección reseñada anteriormente) el 1 de enero de cada año. Los abonos se harán sin recargos para la
sociedad y en favor de la Sociedad Española de Malacología y no de ninguna persona de la junta directiva. Aque-
llos socios que no abonen su cuota anual dejarán de recibir las publicaciones de la Sociedad. Los bonos de ins-
cripción se enviarán junto con el abono de una cuota anual al Tesorero.
A los residentes en el extranjero se les ruega que abonen su cuota mediante giro postal en euros (internatio-
nal postal money orders in euros sent to the Treasurer). Members living in foreing countries can deduce 6 euros
if paid before 1 5 April.
Cada socio tiene derecho a recibir anualmente los números de Iberus, Reseñas Malacológicas y Noticiarios que
se publiquen.
Indice
Iberus
26 (1) 2008
Mifsud, C. AND Ovalis, P. Re-discovery of living specimens of Heliacus ( Gyriscus) jeffreysianus
(Tiberi, 1 867) (Gastropoda: Architectonicidae)
Re descubrimiento de ejemplares vivos de Heliacus (Gyriscus) jeffreysianus (Tiberi, 1867)
(Gastropoda: Architectonicidae) 1-4
ROLÁN, E., RYALL, P. AND Horro, J. Notes on West African Perrona (Gastropoda: Clavatulidae),
with the description of a new species
Notas sobre Perrona ( Gastropoda: Clavatulidae) en Africa Occidental, con la descripción de
una nueva especie 5-16
Moukrim, A., Id Halla, M., Kaaya, A., Bouhaimi, A., Benomar, S. et Mathieu, M. Pattern of
reserve storage of the two mussel species Perna perna and Mytilus galloprovincialis living on
Moroccan coasts: annual variation and effect of pollution
Patrones de almacenamiento de reservas en dos especies de mejillón Perna perna y Mytilus gallo-
provincialis de las costas de Marruecos: variación anual y efecto de la contaminación . . 17-28
Bergayou, H., Moukrim, A., Mathieu, M. and Gimazane, J.-P. Reproducdon of the cockle
Cerastoderma edule (Linné, 1758) in the estuary of Oued Souss (southwestern Morocco)
Reproducción del berberecho Cerastoderma edule (Linné, 1758) en el estuario del Oued Souss
(suroeste de Marruecos) 29-42
Bogi, C. E Bartolini, S. Xylodiscula wareni n. sp., una nuova specie per le coste orientali della
Sicilia
Xylodiscula wareni n. sp., una- nueva specie para las costas orientales de Sicilia 43-46
MORENO-RUEDA, G. The colour white diminishes weight loss during aestivation in the arid-
dwelling land snail Sphincterochila (Albea) candidísima
El color blanco disminuye la pérdida de peso durante la estivación en el caracol de medios
áridos Sphincterochila (Albea) candidissima 47-51
McLEAN, J. H. AND GOFAS, S. Notes on the genus Anadema H. and A. Adams, 1854 (Gastropoda:
Colloniidae)
Notas sobre el género Anadema H. y A. Adams, 1854 (Gastropoda: Colloniidae) — 53-63
Cachia, C. AND MlFSUD, C. A new species of Mangelia (Turridae: Mangeliinae) from the Medite-
rranean Sea
Una nueva especie de Mangelia (Turridae: Mangeliinae) del Mediterráneo 65-68
Tamayo Goya, J. C. Catálogo de los bivalvos marinos del sector central del Golfo de Valencia
(España)
Checklist of the marine bivalves in the central sector ofthe Gulf of Valencia (Spain) — 69-80
ROLÁN, E. AND FernáNDEZ-GarcéS, R. New data on the Caribbean Triphoridae (Caenogas-
tropoda, Triphoroidea) with the description of 26 new species
Nuevos datos sobre los Triphoridae ( Caenogastropoda, Triphoroidea) del Caribe, con la descrip-
ción de 26 nuevas especies 81-170
ISSN 0212-3010
<SLU
((OI
.1153
y\c L-L~
Werus
Vol. 26 (2)
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Comité di Redacción (Board of Editors)
Editor de Publicaciones (Editor-in-Chief)
Serge Gofas Universidad de Málaga, España
Director de Redacción (Executive Editor)
Gonzalo Rodríguez Casero Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editora Ejecutiva (Managing Editor)
Eugenia Mg Martínez Cueto-Felgueroso Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editores Adjuntos (Associate editors)
Iberus gualtieranus (Linnaeus, 1758), una especie emblemática de la península Ibérica, que da
nombre a la revista. Dibujo realizado por José Luis González Rebollar “Toza”.
Iberus
M22'm
V*
Slt— C,
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Vol. 26 (2)
Oviedo, diciembre 2008
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus publica trabajos que traten sobre cualquier aspecto relacionado con la Malacología. Se
admiten también notas breves. Iberus edita un volumen anual que se compone de dos o más números.
Instrucciones para los autores
Los manuscritos deben remitirse a: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Bio-
logía Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España.
Los trabajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias). Se recomienda a los autores leer
cuidadosamente las normas de publicación que se incluyen en cada número de la revista.
Suscripciones
Iberus puede recibirse siendo socio de la Sociedad Española de Malacología, en cualquiera de sus
formas, o mediante intercambio. Aquellos socios que deseen adquirir números atrasados deberán diri-
girse al bibliotecario.
Los no socios deberán ponerse en contacto con BACKHUYS PUBLISHERS, P.O. Box 321,
2300 AH Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-71-51 70 208, Fax: +31-71-51 71 856, Correo Elec-
trónico: backhuys@euronet.nl
Los resúmenes de los artículos editados en esta revista se publican en Aquatic Science
and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) y en el Zoological Records, BIOSIS.
Contents list published in Aquatic Science and Fisheries Abstracts and Zoological Records,
BIOSIS.
Dep. Leg. B-43072-81
ISSN 0212-3010
Diseño y maquetación: Gonzalo Rodríguez
Impresión: LOREDO, S. L. - Gijón
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas , 26 (2): 1-14, 2008
Ultrastructural studies on the spermatogenesis of the
African mussel Perna perna (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)
Estudio ultraestructural de la espermatogénesis del mejillón africano
Perna perna (Bivalvia: Mytilidae)
Soumya BENOMAR*, Oumkeltoum BELHSEN**, Didier GOUX**,
Michel MATHIEU** and Abdellatif MOUKRIM*1
Recibido el 30-V-2006. Aceptado el 15-1-2008
ABSTRACT
Transmission electrón microscopy of spermiogenesis ¡n gonads of Perno perna (Mytilidae)
was carried out to study the different developmental stages and the structure of mature
sperm. Samples of mussels originated from a population living at Cap Ghir (southwestern
Morocco) and were collected from December 1 999 to June 2000 at several periods of their
sexual cycle. Numerous acini, surrounded by a connective tissue containing vesicular cells,
constituted the mate gonad of P. perna. Groups of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and sper-
matids, interconnected by ¡ntercellular bridges, were found in these acini. Proacrosomal
vesicles and a short flagellum developed early in spermatogonia. Numerous Sertoli-like cells
were distributed among spermatogonia, nearest the inner wall of each acinus. The reduced
cytoplasm of primary and secondary spermatocytes mainly contained mitochondria and
proacrosomal vesicles. Spermatogenesis consisted of a progressive condensation of the
chromatin and a reduction in size of the nucleus, the migration of the proacrosomal granule
from the base of the nucleus to its apex to become the acrosome, and the elaboraron of the
flagellum by the distal centriole. The nucleus of the mature spermatozoon was barrel shaped
and contained a completely condensed chromatin. The funnel shaped acrosome showed
two types of electrón-dense materials in the basal and apical parts, and a more lucent zone
in the subacrosomal invagination and the center of the premembranoid sleeve. An axial rod
could be observed from the apex of the acrosome up to the base of the nucleus. The length
of the nucleus in the spermatozoon, the premembranoid sleeve, and the presence of three
types of materials in the acrosome might be additional criterio to sepárate the Moroccan
populations of P. perna from other Mytilidae and, in particular, from those of Mytilus gallo-
provincialis which also lives along Moroccan coasts.
RESUMEN
Las gónadas de Perna perna (Mytilidae) se examinaron en microscopía electrónica de
transmisión (TEM) con el fin de estudiar los estadios de desarrollo y la estructura del
esperma maduro. Las muestras de mejillones se originaron de una población asentada en
Cap Ghir (suroeste de Marruecos) y fueron colectadas entre diciembre de 1 999 y junio
de 2000 en varios momentos de su ciclo sexual. La gónada macho de P. perna se com-
pone de numerosos ácinos, rodeados por un tejido conectivo que contiene células vesicu-
* Laboratoire Systémes Aquatiques, Milieu Marín et Continental, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ibn Zohr, BP
28/S, 80000 Agadir, Morocco.
** Laboratoire de Biologie et de Biotechnologie Marines, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Caen, Esplanade
de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex, France.
1 Address reprint requests.
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
losas. Grupos de espermatogenias, espermatocitos y espermatidias, vinculados por puen-
tes intercelulares, fueron encontrados en estos ácinos. Vesículas proacrosomales y un fla-
gelo corto se desarrollaron temprano en las espermatogonias. Numerosas células tipo Ser-
toli estaban distribuidas en las espermatogonias, ¡unto a la pared interna de cada ácino.
El citoplasma reducido de espermatocitos primarios y secundarios contenía principal-
mente mitocondrias y vesículas proacrosómicas. La espermiogénesis consistió en una pro-
gresiva condensación de la cromatina y reducción del tamaño del núcleo, en la migración
del gránulo proacrosomal desde la base del núcleo hasta su ápice en donde forma el
acrosoma y en la elaboración del flagelo por el centriolo distal. El núcleo de! espermato-
zoo maduro tiene forma de barril y contiene una cromatina completamente condensada.
El acrosoma, en forma de embudo, presenta dos tipos de materiales densos frente a los
electrones de las partes basal y apical y una zona más clara en la invaginación subacro-
somal y en el centro de la manga premembranóide. Una varilla axial se puede observar
entre el ápice del acrosoma y la base del núcleo. La longitud del núcleo del espermato-
zoo, la manga premembraníode y la presencia de tres tipos de material en el acrosoma
pueden resultar criterios adicionales para diferenciar las poblaciones marroquíes de P.
perna de otros Mytilidae y particularmente de aquellas de Mytilus galloprovincialis, que
también vive en la costa marroquí.
KEY WORDS: Perna perna , spermatogenesis, Mytilidae, ultrastructure.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Perna perna, espermatogénesis, Mytilidae, ultraestructura.
INTRODUCTION
Ln Bivalvia, the morphology of the
spermatozoon gives information on the
mode of fertilization (in water, or in the
mollusc) (Franzen, 1955) and on the
systematic position of taxa (Healy, Keys
and Daddow, 2000). As the morphol-
ogy of this gamete is well conserved in
several taxa, it is considered to be a
good indicator of phylogenetic relation-
ships between species, in particular
when these come cióse to each other
(Popham, 1979; Healy et al., 2000). A
good example is the family Mytilidae, as
the characteristics of the spermatozoon
vary remarkably between genera
(Kafanov and Drozdov, 1998).
Contrary to studies which have been
carried out on the spermatogenesis of
numerous mytilids, little information on
the developmental cell stages of the
male line in Perna perna is available in
literature. The fine structure of mature
spermatozoa of this mussel was already
studied by Bourcart, Lavallard and
Lubet (1965), or by Bernard and
Hodgson (1985), while aspeets of
spermiogenesis in P. perna were first
described by Bernard and Hodgson
(1985). By contrast, to our knowledge,
there are no published reports on the
first cell stages of spermatogenesis.
Therefore, the aim of this work was to
describe the fine structure of the devel-
opmental cell stages which succeeded in
the spermatogenesis of this mussel and,
in particular, during the formation of
the acrosome, as this organelle has a
direct implication on the fertilization of
the oocyte.
As other populations of P. perna live
worldwide under tropical conditions
(see the review by Hicks, McMahon
and Ingrao, 2001), it is interesting to
detect the variations which may exist in
the morphology of spermatozoa when
they originate from different communi-
ties of mussels, as the fine structure of
these male cells has already been
studied in Brazilian (Bourcart et al.,
1965) as well as in South African
(Bernard and Hodgson, 1985) popula-
tions of P. perna. Consequently, the
second aim of this work was to compare
spermatozoon morphologies between
2
BENOMAR ET AL. : Spermatogenesis of Perna perna
the abovementioned populations of P.
perna and the Moroccan mussels, as P.
perna is present here at the northern
limit of its distribution along the
Atlantic coasts of Africa.
Finally, as the Moroccan mussels are
abundantly consumed by local people, a
project to develop the breeding of this
mollusc for commercial purposes has
been set up in Morocco (Berraho,
1998). However, to realize this project,
more detailed information on the local
reproduction of P. perna was necessary.
Several studies of our team were
already carried out on the growth,
ecology, reproduction, and reserve strat-
egy of this species (Id Halla,
Bouhaimi, Zekhnini, Narbonne,
Mathieu and Moukrim, 1997; Najimi,
Bouhaimi, Daubeze, Zekhnini, Pel-
lerin, Narbonne and Moukrim, 1997;
Kaaya, Najimi, Ribera, Narbonne and
Moukrim, 1999; Moukrim, Kaaya,
Najimi, Roméo and Gnassia-Barelli,
2000). The work reported in the present
study completes these first papers and
gives information on the development
of the male line in this mussel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples of five male mussels each
(3-4 cm long, 8-9 g in weight) were col-
lected in December 1999, January,
March, June, and July 2000 from the
mid-tide level at Cap Ghir (50 km north
from Agadir town). The choice of these
months for mussel sampling was based
on the different sexual stages observed
by Id Halla et al. (1997) in the same
population of P. perna: December (II
stage), January (III A stage), March (IIIB
and IIIC stages). June (IIIC and IIID
stages), and July (IIIC and IIID stages).
Small portions oí male gonad (1-3 mm3
each) were fixed for 60 min in 2% glu-
taraldehyde (in 0.4 M sodium cacody-
late buffer, pH 7.2) at 4°C. The tissue
was then washed in 0.4 M cacodylate
buffer (3 x 10 min) and postfixed for 90
min in 1% tetroxide osmium (in 0.4 M
cacodylate buffer) at 4°C. After dehy-
dration through a gradual ethanol
series, the tissues were directly embed-
ded in Epon resin at 37°C for 60 min
and were subsequently placed at room
temperature during 12 hours for poly-
merization. Semi-thin sections of each
gonad portion were stained at room
temperature with 0.5% toluidine blue in
2.5% Na2CC>3. Ultrathin sections were
collected on copper grids and were
stained for 20 min with uranyl acétate,
followed by lead citrate for 5 min. Sec-
tions were examined using a Siemens
102 electrón microscope.
The length and the width of each cell
stage were also measured (10 cells at
least per stage). Individual valúes
recorded for each measurement and
each cell stage were averaged.
RESULTS
Each gonad was constituted by
many acini, surrounded by connective
tissue and an external ciliated epithe-
lium (Fig. 1A). From the internal wall of
each acinus to the lumen, all develop-
mental stages were present (Fig. IB).
Groups of spermatogonia are positioned
nearest the wall of each acinus, groups
of spermatocytes and spermatids were
located closer to the acinus lumen,
whereas the flagella of mature sperm
were confined to the central lumen (Fig.
IB). All acini emptyed into spermatic
ducts, each being lined by an internal
ciliated, columnar epithelium. Vesicular
cells, containing two types of granules,
were distributed within the interacinar
connective tissue (Fig. 1A).
Spermatogonia : Two types of sper-
matogonia (Fig. 2 A,B) were observed in
the gonad of P. perna. The A spermato-
gonia (primordial cells) were large cells
(16.6 x 5.9 jum in size). Their nucleus
was often ovoid (6.3 x 4.0 jum), each
with a single 1.6-jum nucleolus, and
their translucent cytoplasm contained
an extensive rough endoplasmic reticu-
lum (RER), numerous mitochondria,
and a Golgi apparatus. B spermatogonia
are smaller cells (7.2 x 3.0 jum) and their
nuclei (4.2 x 2.3 jum) had a well-devel-
oped euchromatin and sometimes a
3
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
visible nucleolus. Their dark cytoplasm
contained numerous mitochondria, RER
cisternae, and proacrosomal vesicles
derived from the Golgi complex. These
B spermatogonia had an irregularly-
shaped membrane and intercellular
bridges were frequently observed. In
some B cells, a short flagellum elabo-
rated by the distal centriole, at the base
of the nucleus, could be seen. When the
nuclei of B cells underwent metaphase
(Fig. 3A), these spermatogonia became
smaller (4.6 x 4.1 jum). Numerous
Sertoli-like cells were distributed among
spermatogonia, nearest the wall of each
acinus. Each of these elongated (10.5 x
3.0 ¡um) and regularly-shaped cells con-
tained an ovoid nucleus with chromatin
condensed along the nuclear envelope.
Numerous cytoplasmic processes in
contact with cióse spermatogonia could
be observed. The cytoplasm of these
Sertoli-like cells contained numerous
electrón-dense inclusions, mitochondria,
several lipid inclusions, and myelin-like
figures (Fig. 2 A,B, and Fig. 3A).
Spermatocytes : The primary sperma-
tocytes (Fig. 3B, C) were arranged in
groups of 2-4 cells each, with intercellu-
lar bridges. When these cells were in
prophase (pachytene stage), their nuclei
were similar in shape to those of B sper-
matogonia. However, their nuclear
envelope was thicker, with a clearly
wider perinuclear cisterna. The small
size (6.7 x 3.8 pm) of their cytoplasm
increased the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio.
These cells contained the same
organelles as described for B spermato-
gonia. A short flagellum was often
observed (Fig. 3B, C).
The secondary spermatocytes were
scarcely visible, due to the rapidity of
the second meiotic división. These cells
were irregular in shape (5.7 x 4.3 ¿/m)
and their rounded nuclei (a mean of 3.3-
3.4 p in diameter) contained chro-
matin forming a dense network at
metaphase stage. Mitochondria and
proacrosomal vesicles were mainly
present in their reduced cytoplasm (Fig.
3D).
Spermatids: Their development
within the gonad can be arbitrarily
divided into four stages, from A the
youngest, to D the oldest. A spermatids
(Fig. 4A) were irregular in shape (7.4 x
6.6 |Um) and their round nuclei (4 pm)
contained scattered heterochromatin.
Grouped mitochondria and proacroso-
mal vesicles cióse to the Golgi apparatus
could be seen in their cytoplasm. B sper-
matids (Fig. 4B) were smaller (4.1 x 3.2
ium) than A cells and their nuclei were
more reduced (2.5 x 1.9 jum), eccentri-
cally positioned, and contained a more
condensed heterochromatin. A proacro-
somal granule, resulting from the fusión
of the corresponding vesicles, was
present in their cytoplasm. In C sper-
matids (Fig. 4C), the nuclei became
rounded (2.2 x 1.9 ¡um) and the nuclear
chromatin was continuously condens-
ing, thus showing a patchwork pattern.
The proacrosomal granule migrated
from the basal part of the nucleus to the
cell apex and progressively modified its
shape. Its basal part, towards the
nucleus, became flattened, whereas an
invagination in the granule formed the
subacrosomal zone, containing a mater-
ial less electrón-dense than that
observed in the granule. Spherical mito-
chondria set up at the base of the
nucleus and surrounded the centrioles.
The nuclei of the oldest spermatids (Fig.
4D) became elongated, were completely
condensed, and showed two invagina-
tions, the first at the apex of the nucleus
and the second at its base near the distal
centriole. The proacrosomal granule
progressively became funnel-like and
turned into an acrosome containing a
dense material. In several spermatids, a
premembranoid sleeve was sometimes
observed in the apical part of the acro-
some. The flagellum showed gradual
structural changes during the differenti-
ation of spermatids. It is elaborated by
the distal centriole and was surrounded
by a ring of five mitochondria at the
base of the nucleus. The distal and prox-
imal centrioles were situated in perpen-
dicular position (Fig. 4D).
Spermatozoa: In the 5.3 pm long head,
the nucleus (1.35 ji/m in size) was barrel-
like and was completely condensed. The
very long acrosome was funnel-like
4
BENOMAR ET AL.: Spermatogenesis of Perna perna
Figure 1 . The male acini of Perna perna. A: semi-thin section showing vesicular cells in the
interacinar connective tissue. These cells had two types of granules and lipid inclusions. B: semi-
thin section of an acinus limited by a basal lamina. Sertoli-like cells and spermatogonia are located
along its inner side. Abbreviations, ac: acinus; bl: basal lamina; h: hemocytes; ict: interacinar con-
nective tissue; Li: lipid inclusions; se: Sertoli-like cells; Spc: spermatocytes; Spd: spermatids; Spg:
spermatogonia; Spz: spermatozoa; ve: vesicular cells. Scale bars, 10 pm.
Figura 1. Los ácinos macho de Perna perna. A: sección semifina mostrando células vesiculares en el
tejido conectivo entre ácinos. Estas células tenían dos tipos de gránalos y inclusiones de lípidos. B: sección
semifina de un ácino limitado por una lámina basal. Células tipo Sertoli y espermatogonias están situa-
dos en su lado interno. Abreviaturas, ac: ácino; bl: lamina basal; h: hemocitos; ict: tejido conectivo inte-
racinar; Li: inclusiones de lípidos; se: células tipo Sertoli; Spc: espermatocitos; Spd: espermatidias; Spg:
espermatogonia; Spz: espermatozoos; ve: células vesiculares. Escalas, 10 jcm.
5
Iberas, 26 (2), 2008
Figure 2. Ultrathin sections of early (A Spg) and late (B Spg) spermatogonia in Perna perna , sepa-
rated from each other by cytoplasmic processes of Sertoli-like cells. Intercellular bridges between
spermatogonia are frequent. Abbreviations: bl: basal lamina; cp: cytoplasmic processes of Sertoli-like
cells; cy: cytoplasm; da: dense aggregates; de: distal centrioles; fl: flagellum; m: mitochondria; mf:
muscular fibers around the acinus; N: nucleus; nu: nucleolus; pb: intercellular bridges between sper-
matogonia; pv: proacrosomal vesicle; se: Sertoli-like cells; Spg: spermatogonia. Scale bars, 5 pm.
Figura 2. Secciones ultrafmas de espermatogonias tempranas (A Spg) y tardías (B Spg) en Perna perna,
separadas unas de otras por extensiones citoplásmicas de células tipo Sertoli. Son frecuentes los puentes
intercelulares entre espermatogonias. Abreviaturas: bl: lamina basal ; cp: extensiones citoplásmicas de
células tipo Sertoli; cy: citoplasma; da: agregados densos; de: centriolos distales; fl: flagelo; m: mitocon-
dria; mf: fibras musculares rodeando el ácino; N: núcleo; nu: nucléolo; pb: puentes intercelulares entre
espermatogonias; pv: vesícula proacrosomal; se: células tipo Sertoli; Spg: espermatogonia. Escalas, 5 pm.
(Right page) Figure 3. Ultrathin sections of spermatogonia and spermatocytes in Perna perna . A: B
spermatogonia in metaphase. B, C: primary spermatocytes (Spcl) in prophase (pachytene stage),
each showing a wide perinuclear cisterna. D: secondary spermatocytes (Spc2). Abbreviations, bl:
basal lamina; cy: cytoplasm; fl: flagellum; m: mitochondria; N: nucleus; nu: nucleolus; pb: inter-
cellular bridges between spermatogonia; pv: proacrosomal vesicle; se: Sertoli-like cells; Spg: sper-
matogonia; wpc: wide perinuclear cisterna. Scale bar, 3 pm.
(Página derecha) Figura 3. Secciones ultrafinas de espermatogonias y espermatocitos de Perna perna. A:
espermatogonias B en metafase. B, C: espermatocitos primarios (Spcl) en profase (estadio paquiteno),
cada uno mostrando una amplia cisterna perinuclear. D: espermatocitos secundarios (Spc2). Abreviatu-
ras, bl: lámina basal ; cy: citoplasma; fl: flagelo; m: mitocondria; N: núcleo ; nu: nucléolo; pb: puentes
intercelulares entre espermatogonias; pv: vesícula proacrosomal; se: células tipo Sertoli; Spg: espermatogo-
nia; wpc: cisterna perinuclear ancha. Escalas, 5 pm.
ó
BENOMAR ET AL.: Spermatogenesis of Perna perna
7
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
shaped, could reach up to 3.4 pm in
length, and contained an axial rod from
the apex to its basal part. Three types of
material could be observed. An electron-
lucent zone in the subacrosomal invagi-
nation and the center of the premembra-
noid sleeve could be observed, whereas
two types of electrón-dense materials
were respectively present at the periph-
ery of the apical part and in the base of
the acrosome, the former material being
denser than the latter. The axial rod
passed outside the nucleus, from the
apical to the posterior invaginations
(Fig. 5A). At the base of the nucleus, five
spherical mitochondria, of variable size
(0.5-0. 7 jum), surrounded the diplosome
and constituted the middle piece (Fig.
5B). The two centrioles were situated in
a perpendicular position and showed
the classic nine triplets of microtubules
(Fig. 5B). Some fibers, originating from
the distal centriole and situated in a
radiating position around it, formed a
basal píate with the plasma membrane.
Transversal sections of the axonemal
complex of the flagellum (0.3 pin in
diameter) showed the typical presence
of 9 doublets along the periphery and a
single central doublet. In this last zone,
the cytoplasm was strongly reduced,
thus increasing the nucleo-cytoplasmic
ratio.
Abnormal spermatogenesis : Giant sper-
matogonia, each containing 2 to 5 nuclei
(Fig. 6A), and binucleated spermato-
cytes were often found in December and
March, respectively. In spermatids, lysis
could affect the cytoplasm or the
nucleus to finally yield to an extremely
condensed nucleus or a thick nuclear
envelope, respectively. At the end of
spermatogenesis, the acrosome might
lose its shape, curve, and even empty its
material, thus giving an electron-lucent
zone (Fig. 6B). Cióse to these abnormal
cells, cytoplasmic inclusions with lipid
inclusions and lysosomal membranes
might be seen in the lumina of acini.
DISCUSSION
Most results on the spermatogenesis
of P. perna are similar to those noted on
the differentiation of male cells in other
(Right page) Figure 4. Ultrathin sections of spermiogenesis in Perna perna. A: a young spermatid (A
Spd), with fusión of mitochondria and a Golgi complex showing synthetic activity. B: a proacroso-
mal granule and proacrosomal vesicles near the Golgi complex in an older spermatid (B Spd). C: a
C spermatid (C Spd) with its nucleus showing a patchwork aspect. The proacrosomal granule is
migrating to the anterior apex of the spermatid. D: an oldest spermatid (D Spd) showing the total
condensation of the nucleus. The acrosome is at the cell apex. Abbreviations, A: acrosome; cc: cen-
triolar complex; de: distal centriole attached to the flagellum; fl: flagellum; G: Golgi complex; gpa:
proacrosomal granule; ln: nuclear lacuna composed of heterochromatin; m: mitochondria; N: nucleus;
pb: intercellular bridges; pe: proximal centriole; pi (white arrow): posterior invagination of the nucleus;
pv: proacrosomal vesicles; rf: radiating fibers; sai (white arrow head): subacrosomal invagination of
the nucleus; vg: Golgian vesicle. Scale bars, A-C: 2 pm; D: 1 pm.
(Página derecha) Figura 4. Secciones ultrafmas de espermiogénesis en Perna perna. A: una espermatidia
joven (A Spd), con fusión de mitocondrias y un complejo de Golgi mostrando actividad sintética. B: un
granulo proacrosomal y vesículas proacrosomales cerca del complejo de Golgi en una espermatidia más
avanzada (B Spd). C: una espermatidia C (C Spd) cuyo núcleo muestra un aspecto en mosaico. El
gránulo proacrosomal esta migrando hacia el ápice anterior de la espermatidia. D: una espermatidia de
mayor edad (D Spd) mostrando la condensación total del núcleo. El acrosoma se sitúa en el ápice de la
célula. Abreviaciones, A: acrosoma; cc: complejo del centriolo; de: centriolo distal sujeto al flagelo; fl:
flagelo; G: complejo de Golgi; gpa: gránulo proacrosomal ; ln: laguna nuclear compuesta por heterocro-
matina; m: mitocondria; N: núcleo; pb: puentes intercelulares; pe: centriolo proximal; pi (flecha
blanca): invaginación posterior del núcleo; pv: vesículas proacrosomales; rf: fibras radiales; sai (cabeza
de flecha blanca): invaginación subacrosomal del núcleo; vg: vesícula de Golgi. Escalas, A-C: 2 pm; D:
1 pm.
8
BENOMAR ET AL.: Spermatogenesis of Perna perna
9
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Figure 5. Mature spermatozoa (Spz) of Perna perna. A: longitudinal section, showing the barrel-like
shaped nucleus and a greatly reduced cytoplasm (double white arrow). B: sagittal section of middle
piece, showing five spherical mitochondria around the diplosome. C: transversal sections of flagella
with nine peripheral doublets and a single central doublet of microtubules. Abbreviations, A: acro-
some; apa: apical part of the acrosome; ar (white arrow): axial rod; bpa: basal part of the acrosome; cc:
centriolar complex; m: mitochondria; ms: pre-membranoid sleeve; N: nucleus; pe: proximal centriole;
pm: plasma membrane; tsa: transversal section of the acrosome. Scale bars, A, B: 2 pm; C: 0.5 pm.
Figura 5. Espermatozoos maduros (Spz) de Perna perna. A: sección longitudinal, mostrando el núcleo en
forma de barril y un citoplasma considerablemente reducido (doble flecha blanca). B: sección sagital de la
parte mediana, mostrando cinco mitocondrias esféricas alrededor del diplosoma. C: secciones transversales de
flagelos con nueve dobletes periféricos y un solo doblete cetral de microtúbulos. Abreviaturas, A: acrosOma;
apa: parte apical del acrosoma; ar (flecha blanca): varilla axial; bpa: parte basal del acrosoma; cc: com-
plejo del centriolo; m: mitocondria; ms: manga pre-membranóide; N: núcleo ; pe: centriolo proximal; pm:
membrana plasmática; tsa: sección transversal del acrosome. Escalas, A, B: 2 pm; C: 0,5 pm.
10
BENOMAR ET AL. : Spermatogenesis of Perna perna
Figure 6. Abnormal spermatogenesis in Perna perna. A: a giant multinucleated spermatogonium.
(B): acrosomal distortion, with emptying (black arrow) of the material (*). Abbreviations, A: acro-
some; N: nucleus. Scale bars. 3 pm.
Figura 6. Espermatogénesis anómala en Perna perna. A: una espermatogonia gigante multinucleada. B:
distorsión acrosomal con escurrimiento (flecha negra) del material (*). Abreviaciones, A: acrosoma, N:
núcleos. Escalas, 3 }im.
bivalvia (Longo and Dornfeld, 1967;
Bernard and Hodgson, 1985;
Hodgson and Bernard, 1986a; Reunov
and Hodgson, 1994; Healy, 1996). All
these reports demonstrated the existence
of primitive spermatozoa (Franzen,
1955) in bivalvia. These primitive sper-
matozoa, also called aquasperm (Rouse
and Jamieson, 1987), are typical of
invertebrate species which release their
sperm in water. However, several points
warrant special comments.
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
The barrel-like shape of the nucleus
in the P. perna spermatozoon agreed
with the report by Boucart et al.
(1965) on Brazilian P. perna, that of Gar-
rido and Gallardo (1996) on Pe-
rumytilus purpuratus, or those of Hodg-
son and Bernard (1986a, b) and
Longo and Dornfeld (1967) on
Mytilus edulis. However, this shape was
not the same for spermatozoa of other
mytilid species (Hodgson and
Bernard, 1986a, b; Garrido and Gal-
lardo, 1996) and this discordance could
be easily explained by the observations
by Popham (1979). According to this au-
thor, in bivalvia, the shape of the sperm
nuclei shows great variation in relation
to species. The length of the nucleus
(1.35 pm for the Moroccan P. perna ) was
cióse to the figures given by Bourcart
et al. (1965) or by Bernard and Hodg-
son (1985) for two other populations of
P. perna (1.40 and 1.50 jum, respectively).
As the nuclei of spermatozoa in other
species of Mytilidae was often longer
(e.g., 1.76 ¡um for M. galloprovincialis:
Hodgson and Bernard, 1986b), this
parameter might be used to identify the
spermatozoa of P perna from those orig-
inating from other mytilid species.
The presence of an axial rod, in the
nucleus of the spermatozoon, has al-
ready been reported for most Mytilidae
(Bourcart et al., 1965; Longo and
Dornfeld, 1967; Bernard and Hodg-
son, 1985: Hodgson and Bernard
1986a, b; Garrido and Gallardo, 1996;
Le Pennec and Beninger, 1997;
Kafanov and Drozdov, 1998; Reúno v,
Au and W o, 1999). The axial rod is of
great importance, as it takes part in the
formation of the acrosomal filament
(Kafanov and Drozdov, 1998) and is
projected ahead in the oocyte during the
acrosomal reaction (Reunov et al.,
1999). However, in our study, the rod did
not have any transversal striation and
longitudinal fibrils, as the cross-striation
noted by Bourcart et al. (1965) in the
spermatozoa of Brazilian P. perna, or that
described by Reunov et al. (1999) in
Perna viridis, and this difference might be
due to intraspecific variations between
the different populations of this mussel.
Proacrosomal vesicles in early devel-
opmental stages of spermatogenesis
were already described in all Mytilidae
studied (Thielley, Weppe and
Herbaut, 1993; Reunov and Hodgson
1994; Gaulejac, Henry and Vicente,
1995) and this point cannot be used to
discriminate the species of Mytilidae via
the study of their spermatozoa. More in-
teresting were the shape of the acrosome
for P. perna, the existence of a premem-
branoid sleeve, and the presence of
three types of materials therein. The
funnel-like shape of this acrosome was
greatly similar to that of M. galloprovin-
cialis (Bernard and Hodgson, 1986b)
and was considered by Franzen (1956)
an adaptation allowing the penetration
of the spermatozoon through the ter-
tiary envelope surrounding the ovum.
The presence of a premembranoid
sleeve in the acrosome of P. perna has al-
ready been observed in the spermato-
zoon of M. edulis (Longo and Dorn-
feld, 1965). However, this sleeve was
seen by Bernard and Hodgson (1985)
only in spermatids of South African P.
perna, whereas the corresponding sper-
matozoa did not have such structure.
Another discordance can also be noted
for the three types of material (2 elec-
trón-dense zones and a third more lu-
cent) in the acrosome. If these three
types were also observed in the acro-
somes of Pinctada margaritifera (Thielley
et al., 1993) and of Choromytilus chorus
(Garrido and Gallardo, 1996), two
types of material (an electrón-dense
zone and a more lucent) were only de-
scribed in the acrosomes of South
African P perna (Bernard and Hodg-
son, 1985) as well as in those of other
mytilids (Popham, 1979; Hodgson and
Bernard, 1986a, b; Gaulejac et al.,
1995). Moreover, a reticular structure in
the dense zone of the acrosome apex
was described in the Brazilian P. perna,
whereas it was not found in the Moroc-
can mussels. To explain these three dif-
ferences, the more likely hypothesis is to
consider them intraspecific variations,
probably linked to the presence of local
subspecies of P. perna in Brazil, Morocco,
and South Africa.
12
BENOMAR ET AL. : Spermatogenesis of Perno, perno
The structure of the P. perna flagel-
lum, with 9 peripheral doublets and a
single central doublet, was similar to
that noted for the tails of spermatozoa
which fertilized ova in sea water. The
presence of short flagella in some B
spermatogonia and primary spermato-
cytes was already reported by Reunov
and Hodgson (1994) in other mytilids.
The radiating fibers around the distal
centriole were also described in the
spermatozoa of several Mytilidae
(Reunov and Hodgson, 1994) and of
Haliotis tuberculata (Belhsen, 2000).
According to Gracia Bozzo, Ribes,
Sagrista, Poquet and Durfort (1993),
such radiating fibers would allow
control of the motility, direction, and
speed of gametes.
Abnormal cells noted in the sper-
matogenesis of P. perno were also ob-
served in other bivalvia by Dorange
and Le Pennec (1989), Gaulejac et al.
(1995), or Thielley et al. (1993). Indeed,
the formation of giant cells, a nuclear or
cytoplasmic lysis, and changes in the
shape of the acrosome might be the re-
sult of accidental deviations during
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Belhsen, O. K., 2000. Etude cytologique de la ga-
métogénése, du systéme nerveux central et du
cycle de reproduction de l'ormeau européen Ha-
liotis tuberculata (L.). Tesis doctoral. Caen,
France. 245 p.
Berraho, A., 1998. Ressources halieutiques etpo-
tentialités aquacoles au Maroc. Expo'98, Maroc,
1998. 82 p.
Bernard, R.T. F. and Hodgson, A. N., 1985.
The fine structure of the sperm and sper-
matid differentiation in the brown mussel
Perna perna. South African Journal ofZoology,
20: 5-9.
Bourcart, C., Lavallard, R. and Lubet, P.,
1965. Ultrastucture du spermatozoide de la
moule ( Mytilus perna von Ihering). Comptes
Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Acadé-
mie des Sciences, Série D, Sciences naturelles,
260: 5096-5099.
Dorange, G. and Le Pennec, M., 1989. Ultra-
structure of spermatogenesis in Peden max-
imus (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Invertebrate Repro-
duction and Development, 15: 108-117.
spermatogenesis. However, as many ab-
normal cells were seen in the lumina of
acini, it can be assumed that these cells
would be rapidly eliminated via their
being carried to the male genital orifice.
In conclusión, the spermatogenesis of
P perna was similar to differentiations of
male cells described in other bivalvia.
However, several differences could be
noted. The length of the nucleus, the pre-
membranoid sleeve, and the presence of
three types of material in the acrosome
may be, in our opinión, efficient criteria
i) to sepárate the Moroccan populations
of P. perna from similar populations
living in another countries, and ii) to
identify the communities of this species
from other Mytilidae and, in particular,
from those of M. galloprovincialis which
also lives along Moroccan coasts.
ACNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to Ms. A.M.
Renou for the realization of ultrathin
sections and Mr. D. Goux for photo-
graphic Services.
Franzen, A., 1955. Comparative morphologi-
cal investigations into spermiogenesis among
Mollusca. Zoologiska Bidrag, Uppsala, 30: 399-
456.
Franzen, A., 1956. On spermiogenesis, mor-
phology of the spermatozoon, and biology of
the fertilization among invertebrates. Zoolo-
giska Bidrag, Uppsala, 31: 356-482.
Garrido, O. and Gallardo, C. S., 1996. Ul-
trastructure of sperms in bivalve molluscs of
the Mytilidae family. Invertebrate Reproduction
and Development, 292: 95-102.
Gaulejac, B. de, Henry, M. and Vicente, N.,
1995. An ultrastructural study of gametoge-
nesis of the marine bivalve Pinna nobilis (Lin-
naeus 1758). II. Spermatogenesis. Journal of
Molluscan Studies, 61: 393-403.
Gracia Bozzo, M., Ribes, E., Sagrista, E., Po-
quet, M. and Durfort, M., 1993. Fine struc-
ture of the spermatozoa of Crassostrea gigas
(Mollusca, Bivalvia). Molecular Reproduction
and Development, 34: 206-211.
13
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Healy, J. M., 1996. Molluscan sperm ultra-
structure: correlation with taxonomic units
within the Gastropoda, Cephalopoda and
Bivalvia. In Taylor, J. D. (Ed.): Origin and evo-
lutionary radiation ofthe Mollusca. Oxford Uni-
versity Press, pp. 99-113.
Healy, J. M., Keys, J. L. and Daddow, L. Y. M.,
2000. Comparative sperm ultrastructure in
pteriomorphian bivalves with special refer-
ence to phylogenetic and taxonomic impli-
cations. In Harper, E. M., Taylor, J. D., Crame,
J. A. (Eds): The evolutionary biology ofthe Bi-
valvia. Geological Society, London, Special
publications, 177: 169-190.
Hicks, D. W., McMahon, R. F. and Ingrao,
D. A., 2001. Two invasive mussels in the
genus Terna in the Gulf of México. Virtual Pro-
ceedingsfor the State ofthe Bay Symposium V,
31 January-2 February 2001. Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission, Austin,
Texas, p 159-170.
Hodgson, A. N. and Bernard, R. T. F., 1986a.
Ultrastructure of the sperm and spermato-
genesis of three species of Mytilidae (Mol-
lusca, Bivalvia). Gamete Research, 15: 123-135.
Hodgson, A. N. and Bernard, R. T. F., 1986b.
Observations on the ultrastructure of the
spermatozoon of two mytilids from the
south-west coast of England. Journal ofthe Ma-
rine Biological Association of the United King-
dom, 66: 385-390.
Id Halla, M., Bouhaimi, A., Zekhnini, A.,
Narbonne, J. F., Mathieu, M. and Mou-
krim. A., 1997. Etude du cycle de reproduc-
tion de deux espéces de moules Perna yerna
(Linné, 1758) et Mytilus galloprovincialis La-
marck, 1819 dans la baie d' Agadir (Sud du
Maroc). Haliotis, 26: 51-62.
Kaaya, A., Najimi, S., Ribera, D., Narbonne,
J. F. AND Moukrim, A., 1999. Characteriza-
tion of glutathione S-transferase (GST) Ac-
tivities in Perna perna and Mytilus gallo-
provincialis used as biomarker of pollution in
the Agadir marine Bay (South of Morocco).
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology, 62: 623-629.
Kafanov, A. I. and Drozdov, A. L., 1998.
Comparative sperm morphology and phy-
logenetic classification of recent Mytiloidea
(Bivalvia). Malacologia, 39: 129-139;
Le Pennec, M. and Beninger, P. G., 1997. Ul-
trastructural characteristics of spermatoge-
nesis in three species of deep-sea hy-
drothermal vent mytilids. Canadian Journal of
Zoology, 75: 308-316.
Longo, F. J. and Dornfeld, E. J., 1967. The fine
structure of spermatid differentiation in the
mussel Mytilus edulis. Journal of Ultrastructure
Research, 20: 462-480.
Moukrim, A., Kaaya, A., Najimi, S., Romeo, M.
and Gnassia-Barelli, M., 2000. Assessment
of the trace metáis level in two species of the
Agadir marine Bay (South of Morocco). Bul-
letin of Environmental Contamination and Tox-
icology, 65: 478-485.
Najimi, S., Bouhaimi, A., Daubeze, M.,
Zekhnini, A., Pellerin, ]., Narbonne, J. F
and Moukrim, A., 1997. Use of acetyl-
cholinesterase in Perna perna and Mytilus gal-
loprovincialis as a biomarker of pollution in
Agadir Marine Bay (South of Morocco). En-
vironmental Contamination and Toxicology, 58:
901-908.
Popham, J. D., 1979. Comparative spermato-
zoon morphology and bivalve phylogeny.
Malacological Review, 12: 1-20.
Reunov, A. A. and Hodgson, A. N., 1994. Ul-
trastructure of the spermatozoa of five species
of South African bivalves (Mollusca), and
an examination of early spermatogenesis.
Journal of Morphology , 219: 275-283.
Reunov, A. A, Au, D. W. T. and Wo, R. S. S.,
1999. Spermatogenesis of the green-lipped
mussel Perna viridis with dual patterns of
acrosome and tail development in sper-
matids. Helgoland Marine Research, 53: 62-69.
Rouse, G. W. and Jamieson, B. G. M., 1987. An
ultrastructural study of the spermatozoa of
the polychaetes Eurythoe complanata (Am-
phinomidae), Clymenella sp. and Micromaldane
sp. (Maldanidae), with definition of sperm
types in relation to reproductive biology.
Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology, 19: 573-
584.
Thielley, M., Weppe, M. and Herbaut, C,
1993. Ultrastructural study of gametogene-
sis in the French Polynesian black pearl oys-
ter Pinctada margaritifera (Mollusca, Bivalvia).
I. Spermatogenesis. Journal of Shellfish Re-
search, 12: 41-47.
14
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas , 26 (2): 15-42, 2008
Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del
Garraf (NE de la Península Ibérica)
Second addition to the malacological fauna of the littoral of Garraf
(NE of the Iberian Península)
Anselmo PEÑAS*, Emilio ROLÁN** y Manuel BALLESTEROS***
Recibido el 13-III-2008. Aceptado el 30-VIII-2Q08
RESUMEN
Se presenta una tercera lista de 68 especies de moluscos marinos (4 Caudofoveata, 1
Solenogastre, 32 Gastropoda, 15 Bivalvia y 16 Cephalopoda) que no habían sido cita-
das anteriormente en aguas del litoral del Garraf (Barcelona, NE de la Península Ibérica).
De estas, 8 son citadas por primera vez en el Mediterráneo español. Además se descri-
ben tres especies nuevas para la ciencia, una del género Alvania, otra del género Bela y
una tercera del género Chrysallida. Se incluyen comentarios sobre algunos de los taxones
y se ¡lustran al microscopio electrónico de barrido (MEB) las conchas de varios de ellos.
ABSTRACT
A third list with 68 marine molluscs (4 Caudofoveata, 1 Solenogastre, 32 Gastropoda, 15
Bivalvia y 1 6 Cephalopoda) not previously recorded from the Garraf litoral (Barcelona,
NE Iberian Peninsule) are presented. From these species, 8 are recorded by first time from
the Spanish Mediterranean. Furthermore, three new species are described, one of the
genus Alvania, other of the genus Bela and a third of the genus Chrysallida. Further more,
some comments on some taxa are commented and the photographs (SEM) of the shells
from some of them are ¡llustrated.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Lista, Garraf, Cataluña, Alvania, Bela, Chrysallida, nuevas especies.
KEYWORDS: List, Garraf, Catalonia, Alvania, Bela, Chrysallida, new species.
INTRODUCCIÓN
El presente trabajo es una continua-
ción de dos anteriores que se iniciarion
en Giribet y Peñas (1997). En aquella
ocasión se constataba la gran riqueza
malacológica de los fondos marinos de
una comarca tan pequeña como el
Garraf, citándose 622 especies de molus-
cos marinos (7 poliplacóforos, 417 gaste-
rópodos, 190 bivalvos y 8 escafópodos).
De ellos, 53 se citaban por primera vez
para el Mediterráneo español. En dicho
trabajo se delimitaba la zona de estudio,
se incluía un mapa, se describía la varie-
dad y particularidades de los fondos, y
se añadían comentarios y fotografías al
MEB sobre varios taxones.
Posteriormente Giribet y Peñas (1998)
describen en aguas del Garraf una nueva
* Carrer Olérdona, 39-5°, 08800 Vilanova i la Geltrú (Barcelona).
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782 Santiago de Compostela.
*** Departament de Biología Animal, Facultat de Biología, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal, 645,
08028 Barcelona.
15
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
especie para la ciencia: Epilepton parruse-
tensis-, Peñas y Rolán (2000) citan para la
zona Turbonilla postacuticostata Sacco, 1892;
y Peñas y Giribet (2003) presentan una
segunda lista de 54 especies de moluscos
marinos no citados previamente (47 gas-
terópodos y 7 bivalvos), de los que 18
especies se citan por primera vez para el
Mediterráneo español y también se cita
por primera vez en el Mediterráneo el
género Bathycrinicola, describiendo una
nueva especie: Bathycrinicola nacraensis.
La obtención y estudio de nuevo
material recolectado entre mayo de 2003
y septiembre de 2006, así como con la
publicación de los resultados de la
megafauna de invertebrados no crustá-
ceos de la campaña oceanográfica
RETRO (Ramírez-Llodra, Balleste-
ros, Company, Dantart y Sardá, 2008)
en el cañón submarino de "La Meren-
guera", situado frente a Vallcarca, nos
ha permitido ampliar la lista de especies
de moluscos marinos encontradas en
aguas de esta comarca, con: 4 Caudofo-
veata, 1 Solenogastres, 32 Gastropoda,
15 Bivalvia y 16 Cephalopoda. Las espe-
cies del grupo Cocculiniformia, obteni-
das en el cañón de "La Merenguera"
fueron estudiadas anteriormente por
Dantart y Luque (1994). En total se
conocen hasta la fecha en aguas de la
comarca del Garraf 746 especies de
moluscos marinos.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
El material objeto de este trabajo fue
obtenido en parte mediante dos draga-
dos de arrastre por la embarcación
"Teresa" de la Cofradía de Pescadores de
Vilanova i la Geltrú en Mayo de 2003. El
19.5.2003 se obtuvieron unos 15 litros de
sedimentos entre los caladeros "Fons de
Cunit" y "Cubelles" (Zona 3), frente a la
desembocadura del río Foix, en el límite
sur de la comarca del Garraf, a una pro-
fundidad de 90 metros. El detrito fue
lavado y pasado por una serie de
tamices, siendo el más fino de 0,4 mm de
luz de malla. Se estudiaron unos 5 litros
del sedimento resultante. En la fracción
fina predominaban las arenas.
El segundo dragado se realizó el
22.5.2003 en el lugar denominado "El
Turó" (Zona 2), frente a Vallcarca,
pedanía de Sitges, a una profundidad de
76 metros. Se obtuvieron unos 10 litros
de detrito, del cual, después de lavado y
pasado por los mismos tamices, se estu-
diaron unos 3 litros de sedimentos. Pre-
dominaban restos de conchas, especial-
mente microbivalvos.
Posteriormente, se separaron los
moluscos obtenidos por algunas embar-
caciones pesqueras del puerto de Vila-
nova i la Geltrú durante varios arrastres
y se estudió el contenido estomacal de
cientos de asteroideos de las especies
Astropecten aurantiacus (Linnaeus, 1758)
y A. irregularis (Pennant, 1777) obteni-
dos en los mismos. Los arrastres se reali-
zaron en dos periodos en una misma
área (Zona 1), frente a la pedanía de
Vallcarca: el primero, entre los meses de
marzo y mayo de 2005, entre 45 y 60
metros de profundidad, y el segundo
entre mayo y septiembre de 2006, entre
35 y 50 metros de profundidad. En
ambos casos se trataba de fondos detrí-
tico-fangosos costeros, con abundancia
de moluscos, en el que cerca del 80% de
los ejemplares se encontraron vivos o
con restos de partes blandas.
Los moluscos del cañón submarino de
La Merenguera (Zona 4) fueron recolec-
tados durante 1991 y 1992 en el transcurso
de las campañas del proyecto RETRO,
dedicado al estudio de las variaciones
espacio temporales en la megafauna ben-
tónica del talud continental. Los mués-
treos, realizados con una red de arrastre
tipo OTMS, se efectuaron en tres puntos
concretos del talud, talud superior (450
m), talud medio (600 m) y talud inferior
(1.200 m). Sardá, Cartes y Company
(1994) describieron las características gene-
rales de estas campañas, los puntos con-
cretos de muestreo y la metodología uti-
lizada, mientras que Ramírez-Llodra,
Ballesteros, Company, Dantart y Sardá
(2008) proporcionan los resultados de
biomasa y abundancias de la megafauna
de invertebrados no crustáceos en las dife-
rentes profundidades y estaciones del año.
Las especies de Caudofoveata fueron
identificadas por Lluis Dantart y por L.
ló
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Salvini Plawen. El listado de especies ha
sido confeccionado de acuerdo con la
sistemática y nomenclatura de la
CLEMAM (Check list of European
Marine Mollusca). Se han fotografiado al
microscopio electrónico de barrido
(MEB) las tres especies nuevas para la
ciencia y también algunas de las especies
nuevas para la zona de estudio, sobre las
que se aporta información adicional. Las
fotografías fueron realizadas por Jesús
Méndez en el CACTI (Centro de Apoyo
Científico y Tecnológico a la Investiga-
ción), de la Universidad de Vigo.
Abreviaturas utilizadas:
BMNH: Natural History Museum,
London
MHNS: Museo de Historia Natural
"Luis Iglesias", Santiago de Com-
postela
MNCN: Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid.
MNHN: Muséum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, París.
CRBA: Centre de Recursos de Biodiver-
sitat Animal, Barcelona
MZUN: Museo di Zoología dell'Univer-
sitá degli Studi di Napoli, Federico
II, Nápoles
USNM: National Museum of Natural
History, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington
CAP: colección Anselmo Peñas, Vila-
nova i la Geltrú
CJA: colección José Almera, Vilassar de
Mar
CMM: colección Manuel Muñoz, Vila-
nova y la Geltrú
CPM: colección Pasquale Micali, Fano,
Italia
CRB: colección Ramón Beneito, Tarra-
gona
v: especie encontrada viva o con restos
de partes blandas
c: concha vacía
sf: subfósil
H: altura total de la concha en gasteró-
podos, longitud, en bivalvos
h: altura de la última vuelta
D: diámetro en gasterópodos, altura en
bivalvos
=: aproximadamente igual
RESULTADOS
En el nuevo material estudiado se
han identificado las siguientes especies
según las zonas:
- Zona 1, Vallcarca (35-60 m profun-
didad): 88 especies (63 gasterópodos, 23
bivalvos y 2 escafópodos), de ellas 69
vivas (45 gasterópodos, 22 bivalvos y 2
escafópodos). Una nueva cita para el
Mediterráneo español y dos nuevas
especies para la ciencia.
- Zona 2, "El Turó" (76 m profundi-
dad): 188 especies (114 gasterópodos, 70
bivalvos y 4 escafópodos), de ellas 44
vivas (18 gasterópodos y 26 bivalvos). ).
Una nueva cita para el Mediterráneo
español y una nueva especie para la
ciencia, compartida con la zona 1 .
- Zona 3, "Mar de Cubelles" (90 m
profundidad): 120 especies (78 gasteró-
podos, 48 bivalvos y 4 escafópodos), de
ellas 43 vivas (9 gasterópodos y 34 bival-
vos). Tres nuevas citas para el Medite-
rráneo español y una nueva especie
para la ciencia.
- Zona 4, cañón "La Merenguera"
(450-1200 m profundidad): 69 especies
(4 caudofoveados, 1 solenogastro, 19
gasterópodos, 26 bivalvos, 3 escafópo-
dos y 16 cefalópodos). Tres nuevas citas
para el Mediterráneo español.
La mayoría de especies encontradas
ya fueron citadas anteriormente por
Giribet y Peñas (1997) y por Peñas y
Giribet (2003). En el presente trabajo sólo
se relacionan las especies no citadas pre-
viamente. En total son 68 especies perte-
necientes a los siguientes grupos: 4 Cau-
dofoveata, 1 Solenogastres, 32 Gastropoda,
15 Bivalvia y 16 Cephalopoda, cuyo
listado, su presencia según la zona y su
abundancia relativa puede verse en la
Tabla I. De estas especies, las siguientes
no habían sido registradas con anteriori-
dad en el Mediterráneo ibérico, Haliella
stenostoma, Melanella compactilis, Pterotra-
chea scutata, Chrysallida monterosatii, Ch.
rinaldi, Cylichnina crebvisculpta, Ennucula
corbuloides y Limatula cf. bisecta. Tres espe-
cies se citan a nivel genérico y otras tres
se describen como nuevas para la ciencia,
Alvania garrafensis spec. nov., Bela clarae
spec. nov. y Chrysallida dantarti spec. nov.
17
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Tabla I. Relación de especies encontradas y no citadas previamente. Las especies en negrita se
comentan brevemente en el texto; se indica la zona o zonas en la que han sido halladas y su abun-
dancia relativa. En la última columna se indican con su número las especies fotografiadas.
Códigos: *: primera cita para el Mediterráneo español; **: especie nueva para la ciencia; +: 1-2
ejemplares; ++: 3-10 ejemplares; +++: 11-100 ejemplares; ++++: más de 100 ejemplares; sf: subfó-
sil; v: encontrado vivo o con restos de partes blandas.
Table I. Relation of species found and not previously recorded from the area. The species in bold are com-
mented shortly in the text; the area and the relative abundance are mentioned. On the last column the
number of the figures ofthe photographed species is referred.
Code: *: first record fior the Spanish Mediterranean; **: new species fior Science; +: 1-2 specimens; + +: 3-
10 specimens; + + +: 11-100 specimens; + + + +: more than 100 specimens; sf: subfossil; v: alive collected
or wih rest of sofi parts.
Zonal zona 2 zona 3 zona 4 Figuras
Clase CAUDOFOVEATA
Familia CHAETODFRMATIDAE
Falcidens aequabilis Salvini-Plawen, 1972
Falcidens gutturosus (Kowalewsky, 1901)
Familia LIMIFOSSORIDAE
Scutopus ventfolineatus Salvini-Plawen, 1968
Familia PROCHAETODERMATIDAE
Prochaetoderma raduliferum (Kowalewsky, 1901)
Clase SOLENOGASTRES
Familia NEOMENIIDAE
Neomenia carinata Tullberg, 1875
Familia COCCULINIDAE
Coccopigya spinigera (Jeffreys, 1 883)
Coccopigya viminensis (Rocchini, 1990)
Familia PSEUDOCOCCULINIDAE
Copulabyssia corrugata (Jeffreys, 1883)
Familia TROCHIDAE
Clelandella miliaris (Brocchi, 1814)
Familia CERITHIOPSIDAE
Ceritbiopsis hórrida Monterosato, 1874
Familia ACLIDIDAE
Aclis ascaris (Turton, 1819)
Familia EULIMIDAF
* Haliella stenostoma (Jefffreys, 1858)
* Melanello compactilis (Monterosato, 1 884)
Familia RISSOIDAF
** Aívania garrafensis Peñas y Rolan spec. nov
Familia LAMELLARIIDAE
Lamellaria perspicua (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia NATICIDAF
Natica prietoi Hidalgo, 1873
Jectonatica rizzae (Philippi, 1 844)
Familia FIROLIDAE
* Pterotrachea scutata Gegenbaur, 1855
Familia MURICIDAE
Dermomurex scalaroides (de Blainville, 1829b)
+ v
+ v
+ v
++ v 1
+ v
+++ v
+++ v
++++ v 3
+
++
++
++++ 4
++ v 5-7
++ 8-13
++ v
++v
++V
++V
+
18
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
19
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
20
PEÑAS ETAL.\ Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Melanella compactilis (Sykes, 1903) (Figs. 5-7)
Eulima compactilis Sykes, 1903. Journ. Molí. Stud., 5: 350 ex Monterosato, 1875: 35, nomen nudum.
Material examinado: 2 v, 2 c, Vallcarca, 45/60 m (CAP).
Especie redescrita por Fretter y
Graham (1982), quienes la citan para el
oeste de las Islas Británicas, hasta una
profundidad de 120 m. Esta rara especie
ha sido encontrada viva también en fon-
dos fangosos detrítico-costeros de Vilas-
sar de Mar (ver Peñas, Rolán y Alme-
ra, en prensa) y del Adriático (M. Tisse-
lli, com. pers.)", sin embargo, Giannuzzi-
Savelli, Pusateri, Palmeri y ebreo
(1999) no la citan. Aquí se cita por prime-
ra vez para el Mediterráneo español.
Alvania garrafensis Peñas y Rolán, spec. nov. (Figs. 8-13)
Material tipo: Holotipo, con unas dimensiones de 2.8 x 1.65 mm y tres vueltas de teleoconcha (Figs.
8-10) y 4 paratipos, depositados en el MNCN (15.05/47516).
Localidad tipo: "Mar de Cubelles", comarca del Garraf (Barcelona), a 90 m de profundidad.
Etimología: El nombre específico se refiere a la comarca del Garraf donde se ha encontrado esta
especie.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 8-10)
pequeña, sólida, cónica, tendente a cirto-
conoidea, ancha. Color castaño claro,
uniforme. Protoconcha (Fig. 11) paucis-
piral, de una vuelta y media (medida por
el método de Verduin), con un diámetro
de 410 jum; la escultura (Fig. 12) está
formada por unas 12 líneas de fragmen-
tos de cordoncillos, relativamente
gruesos, irregulares, interrumpidos.
Teleoconcha de espira poco elevada (h=
70% H), con 3 vueltas, la última redon-
deada en la periferia. Sutura profunda,
no canaliculada. Escultura axial formada
por unas 16 costillas, de perfil redonde-
ado, poco robustas, ortoclinas, aproxi-
madamente igual de anchas que sus
interespacios, que desaparecen atenua-
das en la periferia de la última vuelta.
Escultura espiral débil, formada por cor-
doncillos poco marcados, cuatro entre
suturas de la última vuelta, que montan
ligeramente sobre las costillas, más cons-
picuo el situado sobre la sutura, y otros
tres cordones en la base. Hay una micro-
escultura espiral de líneas muy finas y
apenas apreciables excepto a grandes
aumentos (Fig. 13), además de las líneas
de crecimiento. Abertura oval, ancha,
peristoma continuo. Labro engrosado, en
cuyo interior solo se aprecian los 2-3
dientes inferiores.
Distribución : Solo conocida en el área
de estudio.
Discusión : Alvania lanciae (Calcara,
1845), especie infralitoral, tiene una pro-
toconcha con un diámetro menor (360
jum) y 0.2 vueltas menos; la concha tiene
un perfil más cónico regular, las vueltas
son menos convexas, la sutura es canali-
culada, la escultura es muy marcada,
robusta, con menos costillas y más cor-
dones espirales, y tiene microescultura
reticular entre las costillas bien marcada
Alvania lineata Risso, 1926, especie
infralitoral, asociada a praderas de Posi-
donia oceánica y algas fotófilas, tiene una
protoconcha con un diámetro menor
(350 jUm), la concha es mucho mayor,
proporcionalmente más estrecha, las
vueltas son casi planas, la última
ovalada en la periferia, la sutura es
canaliculada, la escultura es muy
marcada formando gránulos en el cruce
de costillas y cordones espirales, y la
abertura es pequeña.
Alvania electa (Monterosato, 1874)
tiene una concha más pequeña y ven-
truda, las costillas son más prominentes,
con un perfil casi anguloso, tiene más
cordoncillos espirales entre suturas y en
la base, que son conspicuos y la proto-
concha tiene 0,25 vueltas menos, un diá-
metro menor y una microescultura dife-
21
Iberusy 26 (2), 2008
Figura 1 . Prochaetoderma raduliferum. Figura 2. Neomenia carinata. Figura 3. Copulabyssia corru-
gata. Figura 4. Haliella stenostoma.
Figure 1. Prochaetoderma raduliferum. Figure 2. Neomenia carinata. Figura 3. Copulabyssia corru-
gata. Figure 4. Haliella stenostoma.
rente, formada por estrías espirales del-
gadas y espaciadas.
Alvania subsoluta (Aradas, 1847)
tiene un color blanco, con las vueltas
muy convexas, la última redondeada,
tiene más costillas, al menos 30, más
estrechas, tiene más cordoncillos espira-
les, la abertura es sublunar y la proto-
concha tiene un diámetro mayor y su
microescultura es diferente formada
por 8-10 cordoncillos espirales muy del-
gados.
Bela menkhorsti van Aartsen, 1988 (Figs. 18-21, 23, 24-26)
Pleurotoma nana Scacchi, 1836 (non Deshayes, 1835). Cat. Regni Napolitana : pag. 13, n° 20, fig. 20
[Localidad tipo: Nápoles, Italia].
Bela nana Spada, Sabelli y Morandi, 1973. Conchiglie, 9 (3-4): 65, lám. 4, fig. 3.
Bela (íshnula) túrgida Nordsieck, 1977. The Turridae ofthe European Seas, 45, fig. A.91.
Bela túrgida Ghisotti, 1978. Conchiglie, 14 (9-10): 163, fig. 7.
Bela menkhorsti Mifsud, 1998. La Conchiglia, 30 (287): 41, fig. 20.
22
PEÑAS ETAL.\ Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 5-7. Melanella compactilis. 5, 6: conchas, 4,5 y 3,3 mm; 7: protoconcha. Figuras 8-13.
Alvania garrafensis spec. nov. 8-10: holotipo, 2,8 mm (MNCN); 11: protoconcha; 12: microescul-
tura de la protoconcha; 13: detalle de la teleoconcha.
Figures 5-7. Melanella compactilis. 5, 6: shells, 4.5 and 5.3 mm; 7: protoconch. Figures 8-13. Alvania
garrafensis spec. nov. 8-10: holotype, 2.8 mm (MNCN); 1 1: protoconch; 12: microsculpture ofthe pro-
toconch; 13: detail ofthe teleoconch.
23
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Figuras 14-17. Bela clarae. 14, 15: holotipo, 7,6 mm (MNCN); 16, 17: paratipos, 6,2 y 7,0 mm
(MHNS). Figuras 18-21. Bela menkhorsti. 18, 19: lectotipo, aquí designado, de Pleurotoma nana,
11 mm (MNHN); 20, 21: conchas, 5,4 y 7,6 mm (CAP). Figura 22. Protoconcha de Bela clarae
(MHNS). Figura 23. Protoconcha de Bela menkhorsti (CAP).
Figures 14-17. Bela clarae. 14, 15: holotype, 7,6 mm (MNCN); 16, 17: paratypes, 6.2 and 7.0 mm
(MHNS). Figures 18-21. Bela menkhorsti. 18, 19: lectotype, here designated, o/Tleurotoma nana, 11
mm (MNHN); 20, 21: shells, 5.4 and 7.6 mm (CAP). Figure 22. Protoconch <?y"Bela clarae (MHNS).
Figure 23. Protoconch of¥>c la menkhorsti ( CAP).
24
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 24-26. Bela menhorski. 24: protoconcha; 25: microescultura; 26: la misma con mayor
aumento. Figuras 27-29. Bela clarae. 27: protoconcha; 28: microescultura; 29: la misma con mayor
aumento.
Figures 24-26. Bela menhorski. 24: protoconch; 25: microesculpture; 26: same at higher magnifica-
tion. Figures 27-29. Bela clarae. 27: protoconch; 28: microesculpture; 29: same at higher magnifica-
tion.
25
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Figuras 30-32. Dientes radulares de Bela. 30: Bela clarae, de un ejemplar de 9,2 mm; 31: Bela
menkhorsti , de un ejemplar de 7 mm; 32: Bela laevigata, de un ejemplar de 9,6 mm.
Figures 30-32. Radular teeth of Bela. 30: Bela clarae, from a specimen 9.2 mm; 31: Bela menkhorsti,
from a specimen 7 mm; 32: Bela laevigata, from a specimen 9. 6 mm.
Bela menkhorsti van Aartsen, 1988. La Conchiglia, 20 (232-233): 30. Nomen novum pro Pleurotoma
nana Scacchi, 1836 non Deshayes, 1835.
Material tipo: 3 sintipos de Pleurotoma nana, MNHN n° Molí 3149, procedentes de Pausilipo, Nápoles,
Italia. El ejemplar ilustrado (Figs. 18, 19) mide 11 x 4,7 mm.
Material examinado: 30 v, 5 c, Vallcarca, Sitges, 35/60 m (CAP); 34 c, Vallcarca, Sitges, 35/60 m
(CMM); 5 c, 2 j, "Mar de Nacra", Sitges, 90 m (CAP). 50 v, 54 c, Vilassar de Mar, -45 m (CAP); 20 v,
57 c, Vilassar de Mar, 45 m (CJA); 1 c, Vilassar de Mar, -45 m (CPM); 2 c, Almería, -30 m (CAP); 2
c. Porto Cesáreo, Italia, 35 m (CAP).
Comentarios: Scacchi (1836) la des-
cribe así: "Testa parva ovato-ventrosa, rufo-
fusca, linea pallidiore per médium ultimi
anfractus decurrente; striis transversis exi-
lissimis; costique in longum digestís; labro
acuto". Queda claro, pues, que la concha
de la especie de Scacchi es de color
castaño oscuro con una estrecha banda
de color claro en el centro de la última
vuelta.
Mifsud (1998) describe el animal
diciendo "el color del animal es transpa-
rente blanquecino con manchas esparci-
das y opacas, blanco lácteo. Hay una
gran cantidad de puntos rosa-anaran-
jado por todas partes".
Según Aartsen (1988a) Pleurotoma
fortis Reeve, 1844 y P. túrgida Reeve,
1844 deben considerarse nomina dubia ya
que son inidentificables, desconocién-
dose las localidades tipo de ambas. Por
el contrario, Aartsen (1988b) considera
válida la especie Pleurotoma nana
Scacchi, 1836 y al estar preocupado el
nombre por P. nana Deshayes, 1835, (lo
que ya había sido mencionado por Ghi-
sotti, 1978), le da el nuevo nombre de B.
menkhorsti. Ambos autores, así como
Cretella, Crovato, Crovato, Fasulo y
Toscano (2005) creen que el material
tipo ha desaparecido del MZUN. Sin
embargo existen 3 sintipos de P. nana en
el MNHN (n° Mol 3149), uno de los
cuales se ilustra aquí. (Figs. 18, 19)
Se acepta la validez de B. menkhorsti
como nomen novum para B. nana, si bien
creemos que la ilustración de Aartsen
(1988b: fig. 1) no se corresponde con la
verdadera B. nana sino con la especie que
será descrita más abajo como B. clarae. El
26
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 33, 34. Mangelia tenuicostata. 33: concha, 6,6 mm (CAP); 34: microescultura. Figuras 35-
38. Chrysallida dantarti spec. nov. 35: holotipo, 1,7 mm (MNCN); 36, 37: paratipos, 1,3 y 1,46
mm (MNCN); 38: protoconcha. Figuras 39-41. Chrysallida monterosatii. 39, 40: conchas, 2,2 y
2,3 mm (CAP); 41: protoconcha.
Figures 33, 34. Mangelia tenuicostata. 33: shell, 6. 6 mm ( CAP; 34: microsculpture. Figures 35-38.
Chrysallida dantarti spec. nov. 35: holotype, 1.7 mm (MNCN); 36, 37: paratypes, 1.3 and 1.46 mm
(MNCN); 38: protoconch. Figures 39-41. Chrysallida monterosatii. 39, 40: shells, 2.2 and 2.3 mm
(CAP); 41: protoconch.
27
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
problema proviene de que erróneamente
se han identificado como una misma
especie dos taxones parecidos, que com-
parten un mismo hábitat. B. menkhorsti y
B. clarae, son especies diferentes aunque,
en conchas rodadas, las diferencias
apenas se aprecian, con la excepción de
una banda estrecha de color claro en el
centro de la última vuelta, que es típica
de B. mekhorsti. Más adelante se detallan
las diferencias entre ambas especies. Se
aporta fotografía al SEM de la protocon-
cha (Fig. 24), microescultura (Fig. 25) y
esta misma con gran aumento (Fig. 26).
Bela clarae Peñas y Rolán spec. nov. (Figs. 14-17, 22, 27-29)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 14, 15) con unas dimensiones de 7,6 x 3,4 mm y 5 vueltas de teleo-
concha, y 3 paratipos, depositados en el MNCN (15.05/47517). Otros paratipos en las siguientes
colecciones: MNHN (1 s), MHNS (2 s, Figs. 16, 17), BMNH (1 s), USNM (1 s), AMNH (1 s), CRBA
(2 s), CAP (10 v, 25 c) y CMM (3 c, 5 j): todos procedentes de la localidad tipo. Otros paratipos: 6 c,
"El Turó", Vallcarca, Barcelona, 76 m (CAP); 3 c, "Mar de Nacra", Sitges, 105 m (CAP); 15 v, 12 c,
Vilassar de Mar, Barcelona, 45 m (CAP); 30 v, 55 c, Vilassar de Mar, Barcelona, 45 m (CJA); 1 c, Vilas-
sar de Mar, Barcelona, 45 m (CPM); 2 c, San Carlos de la Rápita, Tarragona, dragado 30 m (CJA).
Otro material examinado: Dos ejemplares de la localiad tipo fueron destruidos para el estudio
radular; 2 c. Málaga, 60 m (CRB). 3 c, Nerja, Málaga, 40 m (CAP); 1 c. Islas Gorgona, Arch. Toscano,
Italia, 130 m (CPM); 2 c, Pesaro, Italia, 60 m (CPM); 3 c, Malta, 60/80 m (CPM).
Localidad tipo: Vallcarca, Sitges, Barcelona, 45/60 m de profundidad, en fondo detrítico fangoso.
Etimología: El nombre específico se dedica a Clara Peñas Magro, nieta del primero de los autores.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 14-17) pe-
queña, sólida, fusiforme, casi romboide.
Monocroma, color crema uniforme, ten-
dente al castaño claro, no brillante; en al-
gunos ejemplares las costillas son ligera-
mente más claras; sin banda alguna de
color. Protoconcha (Figs. 22, 27) brillante,
con un núcleo liso de 84 jum, y unas dos
vueltas y cuarto, de color ligeramente
más claro que la teleoconcha, y con un
diámetro de 476 jum. La protoconcha es
lisa al principio y en la última vuelta,
hay costillas axiales que apenas se insi-
núan bajo la sutura y, en la última media
vuelta, son unas 22 cada vez menos mar-
cadas, con algunos cordones espirales
poco evidentes. Teleoconcha de unas 4 a
5 vueltas, angulosas, con 7-8 costillas
axiales por vuelta, más prominentes en
su parte media, que se desvanecen hacia
la base. Abertura casi romboidal que se
continúa hacia la base con un corto y an-
cho canal sifonal. Columela formando
ángulo en su centro; labio externo fino, y
cortante, con una escotadura sifonal pro-
nunciada en su parte superior. La micro-
escultura (Figs. 28) está formada por no-
dulos pequeños, irregulares, elevados y
unidos espiralmente por un microcor-
dón. Con grandes aumentos (Fig. 29) es-
tos nodulos muestran una microescul-
tura muy irregular como el trenzado de
un tejido de lana.
Dimensiones: el holotipo mide 7,6 x
3,4 mm; algunos ejemplares alcanzan los
10 x 4 mm.
El animal no pudo ser observado
vivo, pero en material conservado en
alcohol parecía tener una coloración
crema-amarillenta. Carece de opérculo.
Rádula muy pequeña, con unos 7-8
pares de dientes (Fig. 31) marginales, alar-
gados, con forma de cuchillo, con una
parte basal alargada y más estrecha y otra
apical, afilada y algo más ancha. Entre
ambas existe una prominencia algo
curvada hacia arriba. La longitud del
diente radular es de unas 90 jum. Por su
forma, tiene una cierta semejanza con los
dientes radulares de algunas especies del
género Mangelia Risso, 1826 (Powell,
1966, fig. 129) así como de otras de este
género en Angola representadas en Rolán
y Otero-Schmitt (1999, figs. 83-85).
La ilustración de Oliver Baldoví
(2007) al MEB, como B. menkhorsti , per-
tenece a esta especie.
Distribución: Mediterráneo español,
circalitoral, especialmente en fondos
fangoso-detríticos. Creemos que esta
28
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figura 42. Retusa minutissima , concha, 1,4 mm (CAP). Figuras 43-45. Cylichnina crebrisculpta. 43:
concha, 6,3 mm (CAP); 44, 45: escultura y microescultura. Figuras 46-48. Cylichnina nitidula. 46:
concha, 1,7 mm (CAP); 47: detalle de la escultura; 48: visión apical.
Figure 42. Retusa minutissima, shell, 1.4 mm (CAP). Figures 43-45. Cylichnina crebrisculpta. 43:
shell, 6.3 mm ( CAP); 44, 45: sculpture and microsculpture. Figures 46-48. Cylichnina nitidula. 46:
shell, 1. 7 mm ( CAP); 47: detail of the sculpture; 48: apical view.
29
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
especie vive, aunque no es común, en
todo el Mediterráneo.
Discusión : La especie más cercana es
B. menkhorsti, con la que existen claras
diferencias:
- Color: B. menkhorsti tiene un color
castaño, oscuro en conchas frescas, con
un banda estrecha de color claro, visible
en el centro de la última vuelta. B. clarae
es monocroma, de color crema.
- Forma: B. menkorsti es más esbelta,
con una relación H/D= 2.5 de media,
aunque el sintipo ilustrado tiene una
relación de 2.75. B. clarae es más ancha,
de perfil romboide, angulosa en la peri-
feria de la última vuelta, con una rela-
ción H/D= 2.3 de media; el holotipo
tiene una relación de 2.2.
- Protoconcha: la de B. menkhorsti es
más ancha, pudiendo alcanzar un diá-
metro de hasta 650 jum. El núcleo parece
algo menor, pero no se midieron sufi-
cientes ejemplares como para darle un
valor estadístico.
- Microescultura: la de B. menkhorsti
(Fig. 25) tiene una alternancia de cordo-
nes nodulosos con otros con nodulos
alargados en sentido axial que parecen
dos fusionados. Con grandes aumentos
(Fig. 26), la microescultura que se
aprecia sobre los nodulos está formada
por tubérculos muy finos y apretados,
diferente de la que aparece en B. clarae.
- Rádula: El diente radular (Fig. 30)
de B. clarae es algo parecido al de Bela
menhorsti (Fig. 31), siendo en cambio bas-
tante diferente del de Bela laevigata (Fig.
32). Todo ello parece mostrar una rela-
ción de proximidad del género Bela con
el género Mangelia, al tiempo que una
gran variabilidad en la morfología del
diente radular dentro de ambos géneros.
También tiene bastante semejanza en
su tamaño y forma con Brachycythara
atlantidea (Knudsen, 1952). Esta especie
aparece representada en Rolán &
Otero-Schmitt (1999) incluyendo el ho-
lotipo, y presenta algunas diferencias
con la especie aquí descrita: su color es
blanco sucio, su protoconcha tiene un
diámetro mayor (más de 700 ium) y unas
3 vueltas de espira o algo menos; la pri-
mera vuelta de la protoconcha es lisa y
la segunda tiene muchas costillitas axia-
les juntas, pero en la última media
vuelta, estas se separan y se hacen más
prominentes, siendo apenas unas 12,
mientras los cordones espirales son mar-
cados.
B. decussata (Locard, 1892) tiene una
concha mayor, mucho más esbelta, con
una relación H/D= 3, las vueltas son
convexas, no angulosas en su zona
central, las costillas son oblicuas en la
zona adapical, el color es grisáceo, sin
banda de color claro.
Mangelia tenuicostata (Brugnone, 1868) (Figs. 33, 34)
Pleurotoma attenuata var. tenuicostata, Brugnone, 1868. Mem. Pleurot. Palermo: 25, fig. 17.
Nuevo material examinado: 20 v, 55 c, Vallcarca, 35/60 m (CAP); 35 c, "El Turó", 76 m (CAP); 3 c,
"Cubelles", 90 m (CAP).
Tanto Sabelli, Giannuzzi-Savelli y
Bedulli (1992), como Giribet y Peñas
(1997) dudaban de la validez de esta espe-
cie, y la consideraban sinónimo de M. atte-
nuata (Montagu, 1803), forma propia de
aguas profundas. Solustri y Micali (2002)
redescriben M. tenuicostata , considerándola
válida y diferente de M. attenuata, tesis que
actualmente compartimos. La superficie
de su concha está formada por microscó-
picos tubérculos, más atenuados en los
interespacios que sobre las costillas.
Chrysallida dantarti Peñas y Rolán spec. nov. (Figs. 35-38)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 35), con unas dimensiones de 1.5 x 0.6 mm y 3 paratipos (Figs. 27, 28),
depositados en el MNCN (15.05/47518)
30
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 49, 50. Laona sp. 49: concha, 1,6 mm (CAP); 50: visión apical. Figuras 51, 52. Limatula
cf. bisecta. 51: valva, 14,6 mm (CAP); 52: detalle del umbo.
Figures 49, 50. Laona sp. 49: shell, 1.6 mm (CAP); 50: apical view. Figures 51, 52. Limatula cf.
bisecta. 51: valve, 14.6 mm (CAP); 52: detail ofthe umbo.
Otro material examinado: 4 conchas, procedentes de “El Turó", Sitges, 76 m de profundidad.
Localidad tipo: Vallcarca, Sitges (Barcelona), en fondo fangoso detrítico, a 45/60 m de profundi-
dad.
Etimología: El nombre específico se dedica a Lluis Dantart, malacólogo de Barcelona, reciente-
mente fallecido.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 35-37)
diminuta, sólida, subcilíndrica. Color
blanquecino, brillante, opaca. Protocon-
cha (Fig. 38) obtusa, del tipo C, propor-
cionalmente ancha, con un diámetro de
unas 290 pm. Teleoconcha de espira poco
elevada (h= 50% H), con 4 vueltas plano-
convexas, la convexidad situada en el
tercio inferior de las vueltas, última
vuelta casi redondeada en la periferia.
Sutura poco profunda. Escultura axial
formada por unas 24 costillas bien marca-
das pero no robustas, de perfil redonde-
ado, ligeramente opistoclinas, flexuosas,
más anchas que sus interespacios, que
desaparecen atenuadas en la periferia de
31
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
la última vuelta, mientras que los interes-
pacios se interrumpen bruscamente. Base
lisa, salvo las líneas de crecimiento.
Escultura espiral tenue, solo en los inte-
respacios, formada por 1-2 cordoncillos
espirales en las vueltas anteriores, situa-
dos sobre la sutura, y 3 cordoncillos en la
última vuelta, el inferior situado en la
periferia. Abertura piriforme, columela
arqueada, con un diente columelar en
posición algo interna en la abertura, pero
evidente. Labro no engrosado.
Distribución : Solo conocida en el área
de estudio, entre 45 y 76 m de profundi-
dad.
Discusión : Chrysallida suturalis (Phi-
lippi, 1844) tiene una concha más bien
cirtoconoidea, mayor, más estrecha
(H/D= 2.9 frente a 2.6 de media en C.
dantarti), con la espira más elevada, la
última vuelta es ovalada en la periferia,
la sutura es profunda, las costillas se
prolongan en la base, en la última vuelta
solo tiene 2 cordones espirales y la pro-
toconcha tiene un diámetro menor.
C. rinaldii Micali y Nofroni, 2004
tiene una protoconcha más prominente.
del tipo B, la concha es cirtoconoidea,
con la espira más corta, tiene más costi-
llas, en la última vuelta solo tiene 2 cor-
doncillos espirales y el diente columelar
apenas es apreciable.
C. indistincta (Montagu, 1808) tiene
una concha mayor, tiene menos costillas,
robustas, prolongadas en la base, tiene
al menos un cordón espiral más, situado
por debajo de la periferia de la última
vuelta, y carece de diente columelar.
Peñas, Templado y Martínez (1996,
fig. 47) ilustran una concha procedente
de Isla Palomas, Murcia, considerándola
una forma del variable taxon C. Ínter s-
tincta (J. Adams, 1797). Esa forma ha
sido encontrada también en varias loca-
lidades del mar de Alborán y probable-
mente se trate de una especie diferente
de C. interstincta, pendiente de discu-
sión. Esa forma, de aguas someras, tiene
una concha mayor, cónica, más ancha
(H/D= 2 frente a 2.6 en C. dantarti), las
vueltas son casi planas, la escultura
espiral es más conspicua, y tiene una
protoconcha más aguda, con un diáme-
tro menor.
Chrysallida monterosatii (Clessin, 1900) (Figs. 39-41)
Pyrgulina brevicula Monterosato, 1884. Nomen. gen. e spec .: 88. Not Odostomia brevicula Jeffreys, 1883.
Parthenia monterosatii Clessin, 1900. Die familia der Eulimidae, vol 1, n° 28, part 457: 188.
Parthenia alleryi Kobelt, 1903. lconog. Schal. Europ Meeresconch .: 134, lám. 73, figs. 9, 10.
Material examinado: Más de 200 conchas, Vallcarca, 45/60 m, la mayoría con restos de partes
blandas (CAP).
Especie redescrita por Micali,
Nofroni y Aartsen (1993), quienes la
citan para el Mar Tirreno entre 50 y 200
m. Se ha encontrado abundante en el
estómago de Astropecten irregularis,
frente a Vallcarca, entre 35 y 60 m de
profundidad, siendo ésta la primera cita
para el Mediterráneo español.
Esta especie se caracteriza por su
forma tronco-cónica regular, las vueltas
planas, la sutura somera, las primeras 1-
2 vueltas de la teleoconcha lisas o con
las costillas obsoletas, las costillas son
casi rectas, opistoclinas, el cordoncillo
espiral es muy delgado y el diente colu-
melar es conspicuo.
Chrysallida rinaldii Micali y Nofroni, 2004
Chrysallida rinaldii Micali y Nofroni, 2004. Bollettino Malacologico, 39 (9-12): 177-180. [Localidad
tipo: Isla Marettimo, Islas Eagadi, Sicilia, Italia, 80-100 m].
Material examinado: 2 c, “El Turó", 76 m (CAP).
32
PEÑAS ET AL. \ Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 53-59. Sportella sp. 53-55: Valvas de un ejemplar de 10,2 mm (CAP); 56: prodisoconcha;
57, 58: detalle de la articulación; 59: detalle de la escultura.
Figures 53-59. Sportella sp. 53-55: Valves ofa specimen 10.2 mm (CAP); 56: prodissoconch; 57, 58:
detail ofthe hinge; 59: detail ofthe sculpture.
33
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Figures 60-62. Montacuta sp., valvas de un ejemplar, 1,27 mm (CAP).
Figuras 60-62. Montacuta sp., valves ofa specimen, 1.27 mm (CAP).
Las dos conchas encontradas son la
primera cita para el Mediterráneo
español. Esta diminuta especie, cercana
a C. penchynati (B. D. D., 1883), tiene una
protoconcha relativamente grande, del
tipo B, la concha es cirtoconoidea, la
sutura es profunda, tiene unas 25 costi-
llas y el diente columelar está atrasado,
apenas visible. Ver ilustración en Micali
y Nofroni (2004).
Retusa minutissima (Monterosato, 1878) (Fig. 42)
Utriculus minutissimus Monterosato, 1878 ex H. Martin ms. Journ. De Conchyl., 26 : 159.
Material examinado: 7 c, "El Turó", 76 m (CAP); 60 c, puerto de Los Alfaques, San Carlos de la
Rápita, Tarragona (CAP).
Oliverio y Tringali (2001) ilustran
varios sintipos, consideran que esta especie
ha sido erróneamente ubicada en el género
Pyrunculus , cuando en realidad es una
Retusa y también fundamentan las dife-
rencias con Retusa obtusa (Montagu, 1803).
Los mismos autores citan e ilustran un
ejemplar procedente de Valencia. Previa-
mente Martínez Rueda y Peñas (1993)
habían citado esta especie para La Herra-
dura, Granada, primera cita que se hacía
para el Mediterráneo español.
34
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figuras 63-65. Abra alba. 63: concha, 6 mm (CAP); 64, 65: articulaciones. Figuras 66-69. Abra
prismática. 66, 67: valvas de 4,5 y 5,2 mm (CAP); 68, 69: detalles de la articulación.
Figures 63-65. Abra alba. 63: shell, 6 mm (CAP). 64, 65: hinge. Figures 66-69. Abra prismática.
66, 67: valves of 4.5 and 5.2 mm (CAP); 68, 69: details of the hinges.
35
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Cylichnina crebrisculpta Monterosato, 1884 (Figs. 43-45)
Cylichnina crebrisculpta Monterosato, 1884. Nom. Gen. e Spec .: 143.
Material examinado: 6 v, 28 c, Vallcarca, 35/45 m (CAP).
Oliverio y Tringali (2991) ilustran
dos tipos de esta especie, cuya concha se
caracteriza por su perfil oval, su escul-
tura espiral conspicua y microescultura
axial formada, además de las líneas de
crecimiento, por numerosas costillas mi-
núsculas, rectas y muy apretadas. Se di-
ferencia de C. laevisculpta (Granata-Gri-
11o, 1877), redescrita e ilustrada por Ga-
glini (1991), en que esta última tiene la
concha más pequeña, con un perfil casi
cilindrico, estrecha en su parte central.
Citada por Hidalgo (1917) para
aguas profundas de Asturias, se cita
aquí por primera vez para el Mediterrá-
neo español y también es común en
fondo fangoso-detrítico costero en Vilas-
sar de Mar.
Cylichnina nitidula (Lovén, 1846) (Figs. 46-48)
Cylichna nitidula Lovén, 1846. Index Molí. : 10.
Material examinado: 40 v, 75 c, Vallcarca, 45/60 m (CAP); 8 c, "El Turó", 76 m (CAP); 15 v, 35 c,
"Cubelles", 90 m (CAP).
Gaglini (1991) redescribe e ilustra
esta especie, diferenciándola de C. umbi-
licata (Montagu, 1803), de la cual se
había considerado sinónimo. Se diferen-
cia de ella básicamente en su menor
tamaño, en su perfil oval, no cilindrico.
en su espira apenas visible, debido a la
estrechez del ombligo, y en la escultura
espiral ausente.
Hidalgo (1917) la cita para aguas pro-
fundas de Valencia. La nuestra es la
segunda cita para el Mediterráneo español.
Ringicula ciommeii Mariottini, Smriglio y Oliverio, 2000
Ringicula ciommeii Mariottini, Smriglio y Oliverio, 2000. Boíl. Malac., 36 (5-8): 71-82. [Localidad
tipo: Mar Tirreno central, 360-600 m)
En Giribet y Peñas (1997) se citaba
e ilustraba un juvenil procedente de "El
Parruset, 200-450 m, identificado como
R. cf. leptocheila. Según Mariottini,
Smriglio y Oliverio (2000), en su revi-
sión del género Ringicula , esa concha
pertenece a la nueva especie R. ciom-
meii.
Laona sp. (Figs. 49, 50)
Material examinado: 1 c, Vallcarca, 45/60 m (CAP).
Esta frágil concha tiene un parecido
con la de Laona finmarchica (W. Clark,
1827) pero la de esta última especie
tiene microescultura espiral y la proto-
concha emerge del perfil de la última
vuelta.
Baptopdoris cinnabarina Bergh, 1884 (Fig. 71)
36
PEÑAS ET AL. : Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figura 70. Gastropteron rubrum. Figure 71. Baptodoris cinnabarina. Figura 72. Neorossia caroli.
Figura 73. Ancistroteuthis lichtensteini.
Figure 70. Gastropteron rubrum. Figure 71. Baptodoris cinnabarina. Figure 72. Neorossia caroli.
Figure 73. Ancistroteuthis lichtensteini.
37
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Baptopdoris cinnabarina Bergh, 1884. Malacologische Untersuchungen, 2, 3, (15): 671-677, lám. 69, figs
35-36, lám. 70, figs 1-19. [Localidad tipo Trieste, Italia].
Material examinado: 1 ejemplar de 40 mm de longitud recolectado el 24/04/91 en la zona supe-
rior (450 m de profundidad) del cañón submarino La Merenguera, frente a la pedanía de Vallcarca.
Este ejemplar, recolectado en la cam-
paña RETRO de la primavera de 1991,
fue identificado en aquel momento
como Platydoris maculata Bouchet, 1977,
una especie de nudibranquio doridáceo
de profundidad recientemente descrita
(Bouchet, 1977). Posteriormente, el es-
tudio de Ballesteros y Valdés (1999)
de una serie de ejemplares de doridá-
ceos de similar morfología, procedentes
de varios puntos de la plataforma conti-
nental ibérica permitió identificarlos con
B. cinnabarina, una especie muy poco co-
nocida; estos autores redescriben la es-
pecie aportando nuevos datos anatómi-
cos e imágenes al microscopio de ba-
rrido electrónico (MEB) y registran su
presencia por vez primera para la plata-
forma continental ibérica. Nuestro ejem-
plar del cañón La Merenguera también
fue asignado a B. cinnabarina. Desde en-
tonces, este doridáceo ha sido recolec-
tado en más localidades de la plata-
forma continental catalana (Doménech,
Ávila y Ballesteros, 2006). La especie
europea de profundidad del género
Platydoris, P. maculata Bouchet, 1977 ha
sido propuesta recientemente (Dorgan,
Valdés y Gosliner, 2002) como sinó-
nimo de Baptodoris cinnabarina.
Limatula cf. bisecta Alien, 2004 (Figs. 51, 52)
Limatula cf. bisecta Alien, 2004. Tour. Nat. Hist., 38: 2591-2653. [Localidad tipo: SW Irlanda (52°
21,1' N, 12° 07,4' W), 479 m].
Nuevo material examinado: 2 valvas completas y 2 fragmentos, "Cubelles", 90 m (CAP).
En Giribet y Peñas (1977) se citaba
el hallazgo de una valva casi lisa, muy
frágil, procedente del caladero "El
Parruset", entre 200 y 450 m de profun-
didad, identificada como Limatula cf.
gwyni (Sykes, 1903). Peñas y Giribet
(2003) citan 3 valvas de la misma
especie en el caladero "Mar de Nacra", a
105 m, como Limatula sp. Ese material y
el nuevamente examinado parece coin-
cidir con la nueva especie descrita por
Allen (2004) para aguas profundas del
suroeste de Irlanda: concha semitrans-
parente, de extrema fragilidad, igual
relación H/D y escultura apenas
marcada.
Montacuta sp. (Figs. 60-62)
Material examinado: 3 valvas, "Cubelles", 90 m (CAP).
Esta especie parece un juvenil de
Montacuta ferruginosa (Montagu, 1808)
ya que tiene una zona angulosa en el
borde dorsal posterior y muy parecida
la posición de los dientes cardinales;
sin embargo, es más sólida, tiene una
forma menos elíptica, con una relación
H/D= 1.5, frente a 1.7 en M. ferrugi-
nosa, y el margen interior es crenu-
lado. 1
Sportella sp. (Figs. 53-59)
Material examinado: 1 ejemplar vivo, Vallcarca, 45/60 m, fondo detrítico fangoso (CAP).
38
PEÑAS ETAL.\ Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Figura 74. Histioteuthis reversa. Figura 75. Opisthoteuthis sp. Figura 76. Bathypolypus sponsalis.
Figure 74. Hisdoteuthis reversa. Figure 75. Opisthoteuthis sp. Figure 76. Bathypolypus sponsalis.
39
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
El ejemplar encontrado es adulto y
mide 10.6 x 7 mm. Tiene un periostraco
ferruginoso, relativamente grueso, bri-
llante, muy rojizo en su zona umbonal.
Las valvas son sólidas de color blanco,
opacas, apenas brillantes. Las líneas de
crecimiento son conspicuas. Esta especie
tiene en la forma un gran parecido con
Montacuta voeringi Friele 1877, cuyo tipo
ilustra Aartsen (1996), también citada e
ilustrada por Gaglini (1992) como M.
cuneata, pero las escasas valvas conoci-
das de esta especie son frágiles y mucho
más pequeñas, tienen el umbo más des-
CONCLUSIONES
Este nuevo trabajo reafirma lo cons-
tatado en los anteriores referidos al
Garraf: la gran riqueza malacológica de
las aguas de esta pequeña comarca, en
buena medida debido a la variedad de
sus fondos. Hasta la fecha se han citado
para esta pequeña comarca 746 especies
de moluscos marinos (4 caudofaveata, 1
solenogastre, 7 poliplacóforos, 497 gas-
terópodos, 213 bivalvos, 8 escafópodos
y 16 cefalópodos). De ellas, 61 han sido
primera cita para el Mediterráneo
español; y se han descrito cinco nuevas
especies para la ciencia: Epilepton parru-
setensis, Bathycrinicola nacraensis, Alvania
garrafensis, Bela clarae y Chysallida dan-
tarti.
También se puede afirmar, que ésta
es la zona del Mediterráneo español
más exhaustivamente estudiada hasta la
fecha, y quizá la más rica en moluscos
marinos junto con la isla de Alborán y
su plataforma continental, tras el trabajo
de Peñas, Rolán, Luque, Templado,
Moreno, Rubio, Salas, Sierra y Gofas
(2006).
La nueva lista faunística de los
moluscos marinos del Garraf enriquece
aún más los conocimientos que se
poseen sobre la malacofauna catalana.
En el módulo de moluscos (Molluscat)
del Bañe de Dades de Biodiversitat de
Catalunya (BIOCAT) (Ballesteros,
2007a) aparecen un total de 1909 espe-
cies válidas de moluscos marinos, conti-
nentales y dulceacuícolas registrados en
plazado hacia el lado posterior y la char-
nela es diferente, con un solo diente car-
dinal.
Provisionalmente se ubica en el
género Sportella por el parecido de su
charnela con S. recóndita (Fischer, 1872),
sin embargo la forma de las valvas es
diferente: S. recóndita las tiene equiláte-
ras, casi rectangulares. El ejemplar ilus-
trado en Aartsen (1996: figs. 24L y 24R)
mide 9x5 mm, con una relación H/D=
1.8, frente a 1.5 en Sportella sp. También
la microescultura externa difiere: es cla-
ramente granulosa en S. recóndita.
Cataluña, de los cuales 1 es un mono-
placóforo, 18 son poliplacóforos, 8 son
escafópodos, 303 son bivalvos, 1549 son
gasterópodos y 30 son cefalópodos. Las
especies de caudofoveados y solenogas-
tros, que aparecen en la Tabla I, y que
fueron recolectados en la campaña
RETRO en el cañón La Merenguera,
resultaron ser la primera cita de aplacó-
foros para las costas catalanas. Reciente-
mente (Ballesteros, 2007b) se ha publi-
cado una lista actualizada de los opisto-
branquios citados en las costas catala-
nas, registrándose un total de 205 espe-
cies de este grupo de gasterópodos.
Todo ello contribuye a que la malaco-
fauna de Cataluña se halle entre las
mejor conocidas de las áreas geográficas
de la Península Ibérica y de Europa.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Nuestro agradecimiento a los pesca-
dores Rafael Montoya y Sergi Perelló,
de Vilanova i la Geltrú, quienes nos
facilitaron los sedimentos obtenidos
por la embarcación "Teresa"; a Manuel
Muñoz, malacólogo de Vilanova i la
Geltrú, quien obtuvo la mayoría, del
material procedente de asteroides; a la
tripulación del B.O. García del Cid y a
los Drs. Francesc Sarda, Joan E. Cartes
y J. B. Company, por su apoyo en los
muéstreos de la campaña RETRO; a
nuestro malogrado compañero Lluis
40
PEÑAS ET AL.: Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
Dantart (fallecido en febrero de 2005)
por su inestimable ayuda en la identifi-
cación de numerosas especies de los
moluscos del cañón La Merenguera; a
Carmen Salas, del Dpto. de Biología
Animal de la Universidad de Málaga,
por sus comentarios y ayuda en la
determinación de algunos bivalvos; a
Anders Warén (Swedish Museum of
Natural History, Stockholm), quien nos
confirmó la determinación de Melanella
compactilis; a Virginie Herós, del
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Aarsen, J. J. van, 1988a. Nomenclatural notes.
Forbes' Aegean Turridae. Bollettino Malaco-
logico, 24 (5-8): 141-144.
Aartsen, J. J. van, 1988b. Molluschi d'Europa:
note su specie poco conosciute. XII. Bela menk-
horsti nom. nov.= Pleurotoma nana Scacchi,
1836 non Deshayes, 1835 e Fehria (nov. gen.)
zenetouae n. sp. La Conchiglia, 20 (232-233): 30-
31.
Aartsen, J. J. van, 1996. Galeommatacea &
Cyamiacea. Part II. La Conchiglia, 28 (281):
27-53.
Allen, J. A., 2004. The Recent species of the gen-
era Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea)
present in the Atlantic, with particular ref-
erence to those in deep water. Journal of Nat-
ural History, 38: 2591-2653.
Ballesteros, M. (Coord.), 2007a. Módul de
mol.lucs (MollusCat). In: Bañe de Dades de
Biodiversitat de Catalunya (BIOCAT). Ge-
neralitat de Catalunya & Universitat de Bar-
celona. http:/ / bio. diver. bio.ub.es/bio-
cat/ homepage.html.
Ballesteros, M., 2007b. Lista actualizada de los
opistobranquios (Mollusca: Gastropoda:
Opisthobranchia) de las costas catalanas.
Spira, 2 (3): 163-188.
Ballesteros, M. y Valdés, A., 1999. Redes-
cripción de Baptodoris cinnabarina Bergh, 1884
(Opisthobranch, Doridina, Platydorididae) y
discusión taxonómica de otras especies del gé-
nero Baptodoris Bergh, 1884. Iberus, 17: 27-35.
Bouchet P., 1977. Opisthobranches de pro-
fondeur de l'Ocean Atlantique. II Notaspidea
et Nudibranchiata. Journal of Molluscan
Studies, 43 (l):28-60
CLEMAM: http:/ / www.somali.asso.fr /ele-
mam /biotaxis.php.
Cretella, M., Crovato, C., Crovato, P., Fa-
sulo, G. y Toscano, F., 2005. The malacolo-
gical work of Arcanuelo Scacchi (1810-1893).
Part II: a critical revie of Scacchian taxa. Bo-
llettino Malacologico, 40 (9-12): 114-131.
MNF1N, París, quien nos facilitó el
estudio de material tipo del género
Bela; a Pasquale Micali, malacólogo de
Fano, Italia, por sus comentarios sobre
la familia Pyramidellidae; a Jesús
Méndez, del CACTI (Centro de Apoyo
Científico y Tecnológico a la Investiga-
ción), de la Universidad de Vigo por la
realización de las fotografías al MEB; y
a Manuel Antonio Malaquias, por su
ayuda en la determinación de algunas
especies.
dantart, L. Y Luque, A., 1994. Cocculiniformia
and Lepetidae (Gastropoda: Archaeogas-
tropoda) from Iberian waters. Journal of Mol-
luscan Studies, 60: 277-313.
Doménech, A., Ávila, C. y Ballesteros, M.,
2006. Opisthobranch molluscs from the sub-
tidal trawling grounds off Blanes (Girona,
north-east Spain). Journal of the marine bio-
logical Association of the United Kingdom, 66:
383-389.
Dorgan, K. M., Valdés, A. y Gosliner, T. M.,
2002. Phylogenetic systematics of the genus
Platydoris (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Dori-
doidea) with description of six new species.
Zoológica Scripta, 31 (3): 271-319.
Fretter, V. y Graham, A., 1982. The Proso-
branch molluscs of Britain and Denmark.
Part 7. "Heterogastropoda" (Cerithiopsacea,
Triphoracea, Epitoniacea, Eulimacea). Jour-
nal of Molluscan Studies, suppl. 11: 363-434.
Gaglini, A., 1991. Seconde spigolature... mon-
terosatiane. Notiziario CISMA (1990) 13: 1-
22.
Gaglini, A., 1992. Terze spigolature ... mon-
terosatiane. Argonauta, 7 (1-6): 125-180.
Ghisotti, F., 1978. Ritrovamenti malacologici
nel Mediterráneo. Conchiglie, 14 (9-10): 151-
166.
Giannuzzi-Savelli, R., Pas aterí, F., Palmeri,
A. Y Ebreo, C., 1999. Atlante delle Conchiglie
marine del Mediterráneo. Evolver, Srl, Roma,
127 pp.
Giribet, G. y Peñas, A., 1997. Fauna malacoló-
gica del litoral del Garraf (NE de la Península
Ibérica). Iberus, 15 (1): 41-93.
Giribet, G. y Peñas, A., 1998. A new Epilepton
species (Bivalvia, Montacutidae) from the
Western Mediterranean. Iberus, 16 (2): 117-121.
Guerra, A., 1992. Mollusca, Cephalopoda. En Ra-
mos, M.A et al. (Eds.): Vol. 1. Fauna Ibérica.
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. Con-
sejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Madrid: 327 pp.
41
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Hidalgo, J. G., 1917. Fauna malacológica de Es-
paña, Portugal y las Baleares. Trabajos del
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, serie zo-
ológica, 30: 752 pp.
Mariottini, P., Smriglio, C y Oliverio, M.,
2000. The Ringicula leptocheila complex with
the description of a new species (Opistho-
branchia; Ringiculidae). Bollettino Malacolo-
gico, 36 (5-8): 71-82.
Martínez Rueda, J. L. y Peñas, A., 1993. Fauna
malacológica de La Herradura, Granada. Ma-
lakos, 3: 3-31.
Micali, P. y Nofroni, I., 2004. On the specific
validity of Chrysallida penchynati (B.D.D.,
1883) and description of Chrysallida rinaldii
n. sp. Bollettino Malacologico, 39 (9-12): 177-
180.
Micali, P., Nofroni, I. y Aartsen, J. J. van,
1993. Addition to the knowledge of the Eu-
ropean Chrysallida species, with notes on a re-
cent work by Van der Linden & Eikenboom
(Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Basteria, 57
(4-6): 147-154.
Mifsud, C., 1998. The molluscan species living
in Maltese Posidonia meadows. La Conchiglia,
30 (287): 37-48.
Nordsieck, F., 1977. The Turridae ofthe Eur opean
seas. Ed. La Conchiglia, Roma, 131 pp.
Oliver Baldoví, J. D., 2007. Catálogo de los Gas-
terópodos testáceos marinos de la parte sur
del Golfo de Valencia (España). Iberus, 25 (2):
29-61.
Oliverio, M. y Tringali, L. P., 2001. The types
of marine molluscan species described by
Monterosato, in the Museo Civico di Zoolo-
gía, Roma. General scope of the work, and
part 1: the opisthobranchs gastropods. Bo-
llettino Malacologico, 37 (5-8): 121-142.
Peñas, A. y Giribet, G., 2003. Adiciones a la
fauna malacológica del litoral del Garraf
(NE de la Península Ibérica). Iberus, 21 (1):
177-189.
Peñas, A. y Rolán, E., 2000. The family Pyra-
midellidae Gray, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastro-
poda, Heterostropha) in West Africa. 7. Ad-
denda to the genera Eulimella and Turbonilla,
with a list of the east Atlantic species and sy-
nonyms. Argonauta, 13 (2): 59-80.
Peñas, A., Rolán, E. y Almera, J. Fauna ma-
lacológica de un fondo fangoso-detrítico cos-
tero en el Maresme, Barcelona (Nordeste de
la Península Ibérica). Iberus, en prensa
Peñas, A., Rolán, E., Luque, A. A., Templado,
J., Moreno, D., Rubio, F., Salas, C., Sierra,
A. y Gofas, S., 2006. Moluscos marinos de la
isla de Alborán. Iberus, 24 (1): 23-151.
Peñas, A., Templado, J. y Martínez, J. L., 1996.
Contribución al conocimiento de los Pyra-
midelloidea (Gastropoda: Heterostropha)
del Mediterráneo español. Iberus, 14 (1): 1-82.
Powell, A. W. B., 1966. Molluscan families
Speightiidae and Turridae. Bulletin ofthe Auc-
kland Institute and Museum, 5: 1-157.
Ramírez-LLodra, E., Ballesteros, M., Com-
pany, J. B., Dantart, L. y Sardá, F., 2008.
Spatio-temporal variations of biomass and
abundance in bathyal non-crustacean me-
gafauna in the Catalan Sea (North-western
Mediterranean). Marine. Biology., 153: 297-
309.
Rolán, E. y Otero-Schmitt, ]., 1999. The family
Turridae s. L. (Mollusca, Neogastropoda) in
Angola, 2. Subfamily Mangeliinae Fischer,
1883. Argonauta, 13 (1): 5-26.
Sabelli, B., Giannuzzi-Savelli, R. y Bedulli,
D., 1992. Catalogo annotato dei Molluschi ma-
rini del Mediterráneo. Vol. 2. Ed. Librería Na-
turalística Bolognese, 498 pp.
Sardá, F., Cartes, J. E. y Company, J. B., 1994.
Spatio-temporal variations in megabenthos
abundante in three different habitats of the
Catalan deep-sea (Western Mediterranean).
Marine. Biology., 120: 211-219.
Scacchi, A., 1836. Catalogus Conchyliorum Regni
Napolitani. Typis Filiatre-Sebetil, Napoli, 20
pp.
Solustri, C. y Micali, P., 2002. Nuovi ritrova-
menti malacologici e segnalazione di Thya-
sira granulosa (Monterosato, 1874) al largo
delle Romagnole (Medio Adriático). Cua-
derno di Studio e Notizie di Storia Naturale de-
lta Romagna, 17: 21-30.
Spada, G., Sabelli, B. y Morandi, V., 1973.
Contributo alia conoscenza della malaco-
fauna dell'isola di Lampedusa. Conchiglie, 9
(3-4): 29-67.
42
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas, 26 (2): 43-117, 2008
Systematics and distribution of shelled molluscs
(Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Scaphopoda) from the South
Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea, West Antárctica
Sistemática y distribución de los moluscos con concha (Gastropoda,
Bivalvia y Scaphopoda) desde las Islas Shetland del Sur al Mar de
Bellingshausen, Antártica Oeste
Cristian ALDEA*’** and Jesús S. TRONCOSO*
Recibido el 2-XI-2007. Aceptado el 15-IV-2008
ABSTRACT
The knowledge of the systematics and distribution of molluscs from the area of West
Antárctica, mainly of the Bellingshausen Sea, remains relatively poor. Only 3 families and
1 1 species of molluscs were recorded in the Bellingshausen Sea, while 2 families and 3
species were recorded from Peter I Island. This apparently low number of species is the
result of poor sampling in this area. An integral study of the benthic ecosystem was carried
out in this area by the Spanish Antarctic Program: BENTART research cruises during the
austral summer season in 2003 and 2006 on the continental shelf and lower slope from
53 to 3304 metres. A total of 3133 individuáis belonging to 1 1 8 species of shelled mol-
luscs were identified, of which 571 individuáis corresponding to 71 species of gas-
tropods, 2200 individuáis to 42 species of bivalves and 362 individuáis to 5 species of
scaphopods. Neobuccinum eatoni with 89 individuáis, Genaxinus debilis with 674 indi-
viduáis and Dentalium mojorinum with 159 individuáis were the most abundant species of
gastropods, bivalves and scaphopods, respectively. Of the total cited species, six new
records are added for the South Shetland Islands, 30 for the Western Antarctic Península,
34 for the Bellingshausen Sea and 30 for Peter I Island. On the other hand, new bathymet-
ric records are given for 44 species in Antarctic waters.
RESUMEN
El conocimiento de la sistemática y distribución de moluscos en la Antártica Oeste, mayor-
mente en el área del Mar de Bellingshausen es aun pobre. Sólo 3 familias y 1 1 especies
de moluscos han sido registradas en el Mar de Bellingshausen, así como 2 familias y 3
especies en el área de la Isla Pedro I. Este aparentemente bajo número de especies es el
resultado de una baja cantidad de muéstreos. Un estudio integral de los ecosistemas ben-
tónicos fue llevado a cabo en esta área por el Programa Antártico Español: los Cruceros
de Investigación BENTART, durante los veranos australes del 2003 y 2006 sobre la
plataforma continental y talud entre 53 y 3304 m. Fueron identificados un total de 3133
individuos pertenecientes a 1 18 especies de moluscos con concha, de los cuales 571
individuos corresponden a 71 especies de gasterópodos, 2200 individuos a 42 especies
de bivalvos y 362 individuos a 5 especies de escafópodos. Neobuccinum eatoni con 89
* Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Campus Lagoas Marcosende,
36310, Universidad de Vigo (España).
** Fundación Centro de Estudios del Cuaternario de Fuego-Patagonia y Antártica (CEQUA), Av. Bulnes
01890, Punta Arenas (Chile).
43
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
individuos, Cenaxinus debilis con 674 individuos y Dentalium majorinum con 159 individ-
uos son las especies más abundantes de gasterópodos, bivalvos y escafópodos, respecti-
vamente. Del total de especies registradas se aportan 6 nuevos registros para las Islas
Shetland del Sur, 30 para el Oeste de la Península Antártica, 34 para el Mar de Belling-
shausen y 30 para la Isla Pedro I. En tanto se amplían los registros batimétricos conocidos
en la Antártica para 44 especies.
Key Words: Molluscs, Gastropods, Bivalves, Scaphopods, systematics, distribution, West Antárctica,
Bellingshausen Sea.
Palabras Clave: Moluscos, Gastrópodos, Bivalvos, Escafópodos, sistemática, distribución, Antártica Oeste, Mar
de Bellingshausen.
INTRODUCTION
Knowledge of molluscs in the South-
ern Ocean started to build up towards
the end of the XIX century with the
H.M.S. Challenger expedition (1873-
1876) which visited several Sub-Antarc-
tic islands. The expedition results were
published in the works of Smith (1885)
for bivalves and that of Watson (1886)
for gastropods and scaphopods. The
"Venus" Expedition carried out in 1874-
1875 gave the first report on molluscs
from the Kerguelen Islands (Smith
1879). Years later, the "Belgian Antarctic
Expedition (1897-1899)" was focused on
the Antarctic continent, particularly on
the South Shetland Islands and towards
the West of the Antarctic Peninsula and
culminated with the publication of the
works of Pelseneer (1903) and Plate
(1908a). The British Expedition "South-
ern Cross" (1898-1900) simultaneously
explored the Ross Sea and Macquarie Is-
land and reported new species in Smith
(1902), while the Germán "Deutsche
Tiefsee-Expedition (1898-1899)" to the
Kerguelen and Bouvet Islands gener-
ated new reports that were published by
Thiele and Jaeckel (1931). One year
later, the Germán "Deutsche Südpolar-
Expedition" in 1901-1903 focused on the
Davis Sea, from which many species
were reported by Plate (1908b) for
Scaphopoda and by Thiele (1912) for
Gastropoda and Bivalvia.
Other expeditions from the time
were the "Schwedische Südpolar-Expe-
dition" to several Sub-Antarctic Islands
in 1901-1903, the British National
Antarctic Expedition "Discovery" to the
Ross Sea and Macquarie Island in 1901-
1904 and the "Scottish National Antarc-
tic Expedition" to Scotia Are Islands in
1902-1904, resulting in the contributions
of Strebel (1908), Smith (1907) and
Melvill and Standen (1907, 1912),
respectively. Other parallel expeditions
were the "Expédition Antarctique
Frangaise" in 1903-1905 and the "Deux-
iéme Expédition Antarctique Frangaise"
in 1908-1910, which obtained new
samples on numerous sites cióse to the
Antarctic Peninsula, their results being
reported in several works (e.g. Lamy,
1906b, 1911a). Subsequently, the British
Antarctic Expedition "Terra Nova" in
1910-1913, researched the Ross Sea and
adjacent zones/ areas and resulted in the
publication of the works of Smith (1915)
and Eales (1923). The "Australian
Antarctic Expedition (1911-1914)" was
focused on the Eastern Antarctic and
new species were cited by Hedley
(1916).
Research carne to a standstill from
this date until 1926-1937, when the "Dis-
covery Expeditions" generated impor-
tant reports and inventories on molluscs
from several Sub-Antarctic Islands, the
Antarctic Peninsula coast and the Ross
Sea (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1964). Me^n-
while, other surveys like the "Norwe-
gian Antarctic Expedition (1927-1930)"
explored the Western Peninsula and
other sites and resulted in a work on
Bivalvia by Soot-Ryen (1951). The
British, Australian and New Zealand
44
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Antarctic Expedition (B.A.N.Z.: 1929-
1931) provided a detailed knowledge of
the Ross Sea, Enderby Land and the
Sub-Antarctic Islands of East Antárctica
through the works of Powell (1957,
1958). Alt records and earlier reports
were summarized by Powell (1960).
Later, the works of Egorova (1972,
1982) communicated the results of many
Soviet expeditions held from 1955
onwards mainly to the Davis Sea. The
new French expeditions to Terre Adélie
(e.g. Arnaud, 1972, 1973) and the Japan-
ese expeditions to East Antárctica pub-
lished their records in several works (e.g.
Okutani, 1986: Numanami and
Okutani, 1991; Numanami 1996;
Numanami, Okutani, Iwami, Takeuchi,
Igarashi, Tsuchiya and Fukuchi, 1996).
The last known extensive works are
those of Dell (1990) and Hain (1990).
Dell focused mainly on the Ross Sea and
reported species collected from several
surveys, principally from the US
"Eltanin" cruises but he also examined
samples from some previous expeditions
that were deposited in zoological
museums. Hain reported many species
from the Weddell Sea that were collected
in some Germán //Antarktis,,expeditions.
Apart from the abovementioned
expeditions held towards the end of the
XX and the beginning of the XXI Cen-
turies, detailed information is now avail-
able by means of reports with biogeo-
graphical analyses on enclosed areas (see
Zelaya, 2005; Linse 2006), review of par-
ticular taxa (e.g. Cernohorsky, 1977;
Ponder, 1983; Oliver and Picken, 1984;
Harasewych and Kantor, 1999) and
descriptions of new species (e.g. Engl,
2004b; Días Passos and Domaneschi,
2006).
From a biogeographic point of view,
the earlier studies of the Southern marine
fauna resulted in the definition of the dif-
ferent subregions. There is a latitudinal
división into an Antarctic /high Antarctic
zone and Sub-Antarctic /low Antarctic
zone, and a longitudinal división into
East and West Antárctica (Powell, 1951).
The West Antárctica represents one of the
most interesting Antarctic areas from
both ecological/biogeographical and tax-
onomical points of view because sample
coverage is still extremely patchy. Areas
such as the South Shetland Islands and
the Western Antarctic Peninsula have
been extensively sampled whereas areas
such as the Bellingshausen Sea still re-
mains poorly sampled (Clarke, Grif-
fiths, Linse, Barnes and Crame, 2007).
There are approximately 895 species
of gastropods and 379 species of bi-
valves that are currently known in the
Southern Ocean and adjacent regions
(Linse, Griffiths, Barnes and Clarke,
2006), and some are exclusive to the
Southern Ocean. Clarke, Aronson,
Crame Gilí and Blake (2004) men-
tioned approximately 530 gastropod
and 110 bivalve species. Only 3 families
and 11 species of molluscs were
recorded in the Bellingshausen Sea,
while 2 families and 3 species were
recorded in Peter I Island. This appar-
ently low number of species is the result
of poor sampling in this area: two sam-
ples were taken on the continental shelf
(1-1000 m), zero on the continental slope
(1000-3000 m) and six deeper (>3000 m)
ones were obtained in the Belling-
shausen and Amundsen seas. A total of
1624 samples were taken from the
Southern Ocean (Clarke et al., 2004),
of which 1490 were from the continental
shelf, 98 were taken from the continental
slope and 36 were from deeper waters.
Therefore, knowledge of the biodi-
versity of the area of West Antárctica,
mainly of the Bellingshausen Sea, and in
particular of subtidal marine habitats,
remains relatively poor, except for the
South Shetland Islands (e.g. Arnaud,
Troncoso and Ramos, 2001). Also, there
is an important dispersión of literature
available for the identification of mol-
luscs from this area. An integral study of
the benthic ecosystem: BENTART pro-
gram was carried out in this area by
means of two research cruises during
the austral summer season in 2003 and
2006, which were organized and sup-
ported by the Spanish Antarctic Pro-
gram of the Ministry of Education and
Science (MEC). This report describes the
results of the survey of subtidal marine
molluscs and this paper briefly de-
45
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
scribes and illustrates the species ob-
tained during the BENTART 2003 and
2006 research cruises to facilítate future
marine research in this part of the
Southern Ocean.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The study area was located in West
Antárctica from the South Shetland
Islands (63° 03' S, 60° 38' W) to the
Bellingshausen Sea off Thurston Island
(70° 53' S, 98° 26' W) on the border of the
Amundsen Sea (Fig. 1), and included
the continental shelf and lower slope
from 53 to 3304 metres. Additional
samples were taken in shallow waters
(5-8 m) by means of SCUBA diving
(Table I). Samples were obtained in the
austral summer during the BENTART
2003 / 2006 cruises aboard the vessel BIO
Hespérides belonging to the Spanish
Navy. The molluscs were collected from
47 sampling sites using six sampling
gears: a box-corer with a máximum
breakthrough of 60-cm and an effective
sampling area of 30 x 20 cm, an Agassiz
trawl (width-2.01m, height-1.12m and a
mesh size of lO.Omm), an epibenthic
sledge that consists of a rectangular
Steel frame with three levels (width-
0.8m, heighth-0.4m and an attached
mesh net), a rock dredge with 0.8 m
wide, 0.3 m height, and a mesh size of
10.0 mm, a Nassa trap designed to catch
scavenger organisms, and SCUBA
diving in shallow water. Samples were
sorted on deck and fixed in borax-
buffered 4% formaldehyde in seawater.
Later, in the laboratory, they were sorted
by species and transferred to plástic
vials with 70% alcohol for preservation.
All specimens were identified to species
level, considering shell features and
morphometric ratios compared with
similar species. Taxonomic classification
follows PONDER AND LlNDBERG (1997)
and Rosenberg (2005) for Gastropoda,
Giribet and Wheeler (2002) and
Rosenberg (2005) for Bivalvia and
Steiner and Kabat (2001, 2004) for
Scaphopoda. The specimens were
deposited in the scientific collection of
the Animal Ecology and Biology of Uni-
versidad de Vigo, Spain.
For each species, the systematic
description and synonymies are given.
This ineludes the reference to the origi-
nal description and subsequent system-
atic works that were used for identifica-
tion. The studied material was detailed
by stations as number of live collected
specimen/s (spm.) and fresh empty
shell /s (sh.) and the measurements of
the larger and smaller specimens were
included. Measurements for gastropods
refer to máximum height from apex to
basis and diameter (width, perpendicu-
lar to height); for bivalves, máximum
height from umbo to ventral margin and
width from anterior to posterior
margins, and for scaphopods, longitude
and diameter of anterior and posterior
apertures. The stations were named MB
for Bellingshausen Sea, PI for Peter I
Island, PA for Antarctic Península, LOW
for Low Island, DEC for Deception
Island, and MAR for Margarita Bay.
All figured specimens are from this
survey and were obtained using digital
photography or Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM) at the University of
Vigo. The geographic and bathymetric
distributions are given taking account of
all taxonomical and biogeographical
works revised, and also including the
records of this study, and marking as
"new record /s" the species occurring
for the first time in the study area. The
geographic locations are shown in
Figure 1.
(Right page) Figure 1. Study area, stations of benthic samples from BENTART and locations
around Antárctica mentioned in text. MB: stations of Bellingshausen Sea, PI: Peter I Island, PA:
Antarctic Península, LOW: Low Island, DEC: Deception Island, and MAR: Margarita Bay.
(Página derecha) Figura 1. Area de estudio, estaciones de muéstreos bentónicos de BENTART y lugares
alrededor de la Antartica mencionados en el texto. MB: estaciones del Mar de Bellingshausen, PI: Isla
Pedro I, PA: Península Antártica, LOW: Isla Low, DEC: Isla Decepción, y MAR: Bahía Margarita.
46
ALDEA and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
47
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Table I. Location, depth and sample device of survey stations, named MB for Bellingshausen Sea,
PI for Peter I Island, PA for Antarctic Península, LOW for Low Island, DEC for Deception Island,
and MAR for Margarita Bay. AT: Agassiz trawl, BC: Box-corer, RD: Rock dredge, ES: Epibenthic
sledge, NT: Nassa trap, SD: Scuba diving.
Tabla I. Ubicación, profundidad y arte de muestreo de las estaciones, nombradas como MB para el Mar
de Bellingshausen, PI para la Isla Pedro I, PA para la Península Antártica, LOW para la Isla Low,
DEC para la Lsla Decepción, y MAR para Bahía Margarita. AT: Red Agassiz, BC: Box-corer, RD:
Draga de roca, ES: Trineo suprabentónico, NT: Nassas, SD: Buceo Scuba.
48
ALDEA AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
RESULTS
Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1797
Subclass Eogastropoda Ponder and Lindberg, 1996
Order Fatellogastropoda Lindberg, 1986
Family Nacellidae Thiele, 1891
Genus Nacella Schumacher, 1817
Nacella polaris concinna (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 2)
Nacella polaris var. concinna Strebel, 1908: 82, pl. 5, figs. 76a-e, 78a-b.
Patinigera polaris concinna : Powell, 1951: 83; Castellanos and Landoni, 1988: 26, pl. 4, fig. 5.
Nacella cf. concinna: Hain, 1990: 36, fig. 4.1.
Lepeta depressa Hedley, 1916: 42, pl. 6, fig. 64; Arnaud, 1972: 114; Dell, 1972: 32, figs. 19, 24-25;
Egorova, 1982: 14, fig. 75.
Material studied: 16 spm. (9.0 x 6.1 - 29.6 x 20.5 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (10.4 x 7.1 mm), PA21.
Remarks : Although morphologic vari-
ation is present, only two morphotypes
have been cited that sepárate this sub-
species of Nacella polaris polaris (Hombron
and Jaquinot, 1841). Powell (1951)
described N. polaris concinna as an endemic
species from deep water around South
Georgia, but Beaumont and Wei (1991)
studied the morphologic variation
between specimens from South Georgia
and the South Orkney Islands and con-
cluded that it was a single species and not
a sepárate subspecies. However, these
specimens can be differentiated from the
subspecies N. polaris polaris because they
are paler, thinner and have a more central
umbo and stronger radial ribs. There is
also a bathymetric pattern between both
subspecies since N. polaris concinna can be
found at greater depths.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Georgia (Powell, 1951; Strebel,
1908), South Orkney and South Shetland
Islands (Castellanos and Landoni,
1988), Western Antarctic Península (Car-
celles, 1953; this study), Ross Sea (Dell,
1972), Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Shack-
leton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916) and Davis
Sea (Egorova, 1982); from 10 m (Strebel,
1908) to 695 m (Dell, 1972).
Nacella polaris polaris (Hombron and Jaquinot, 1841) (Fig. 3)
Patella polaris Hombron and Jaquinot, 1841: 191.
Nacella aenea var. polaris: Pelseneer, 1903: 14.
Nacella polaris: Lamy, 1906b: 10; 1911a: 15; 1911b: 26; Zelaya, 2005: 111, fig. 2.
Patella polaris: Martens and Pfeffer, 1886: 101, pl. 2, figs. 11-13; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 127.
Patinella polaris: Strebel, 1908: 81, pl. 5, figs. 77a-b, 79-82.
Patinigera polaris polaris: Powell, 1951: 82; Castellanos and Landoni, 1988: 25, pl. 4, fig. 8.
Material studied: 12 spm. (7.8 x 5.1 - 55.8 x 41.8 mm), MAR.
Remarks : Smallest specimens look
similar to N. polaris concinna (Strebel,
1908), but they can be differentiated by
their darker, thicker and smoother shell,
with more anterior umbo. Powell (1951)
reported N. polaris polaris as a shallow
water species, occurring in Antárctica
and Scotia Are Islands.
Distribution : South Sandwich (Lamy,
1911b) and South Georgia Islands
(Martens and Pfeffer, 1886; Strebel,
1908, Lamy, 1911b; Powell, 1951; Zelaya,
2005), reaching 38°S in the Atlantic Ocean
(Castellanos and Landoni, 1988), cited
in the Weddell Sea as well (Zelaya, 2005),
East of the Antarctic Peninsula (Strebel,
49
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
1908), South Orkney (Pelseneer, 1903;
Melvill and Standen, 1907; Powell,
1951) and the South Shetland Islands
(Powell, 1951), West of the Antarctic
Península (Lamy, 1906b, 1911a; Powell,
1951; this study), also in Bouvet Island
(Powell, 1951); from 0 m (Powell, 1951)
to 195 m (Strebel, 1908).
Family Lepetidae Dalí, 1869
Genus lothia Gray, 1857
lothia coppingeri (Smith, 1881) (Fig. 4)
lectura coppingeri Smith, 1881: 35, pl. 4, figs. 12, 12a.
Pilidium coppingeri : Strebel, 1908: 83.
Tectura coppingeri: Rochebrune and Mabille, 1889: 90.
Lepeta coppingeri: Thiele, 1912: 183, 233; Smith, 1915: 62; Hedley 1916: 41; Eales, 1923: 6; Powell,
1951: 84; Powell, 1957: 128; 1958: 184; Arnaud, 1972: 114, fig. 1 (radula); Castellanos and
Landoni, 1988: 32, pl. 1, fig. 6, pl. 3, fig. 9; Linse, 1997: 27.
lothia coppingeri: Egorova, 1982: 12, figs. 25 (radula), 73-74; Dell, 1990: 105, figs. 185-186; Hain,
1990: 37, pl. 1, figs. 4a-c, pl. 17, fig. 4; Numanami et al, 1996: 212 (table, text), pl.l, figs. 3-4;
Reid and Osorio, 2000: 119, fig. 7A; Troncoso, Van Goethem and Troncoso, 2001: 90, fig. 8.
(conferred); Zelaya, 2005: 112, fig. 3.
Patella (?) emarginuloides Philippi, 1868: 224.
Lepeta antárctica Smith, 1907a: 12, pl. 2, figs. 11-lla; Hedley, 1911: 4.
Pilidium fulvifor mes Egorova, 1972: 384, figs. 3a-b.
Material studied: 1 spm. (6.1 x 4.5 mm), PA19; 1 spm. (5.7 x 4.1 mm), PA22.
Remarks : Its synonymies are vali-
dated in previous works (Dell, 1990).
Linse (2002, p. 56) described lothia cop-
pingeri magellanica in Magellanic waters;
but her figures 9.1.1 1-4 from píate I are
confused in their captions and repeated
in píate X.Therefore the comparison
with Linse's subspecies is not possible.
Distribution: Circumantarctic and
Sub-Antarctic. South Georgia (Zelaya,
2005), South Orkney (Dell, 1990) and
the Falkland /Malvinas Islands
(Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951), Cape
Horn (Rochebrune and Mabille,
1889), Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997) and
Punta Arenas (Powell, 1951), also in
Staten Island, Magellan Strait, reaching
Valdivia (38° S) in the South Pacific
(Dell, 1990). In Antárctica in the
Weddell Sea (Dell, 1990; Hain, 1990),
South Shetland Islands, Western Antarc-
tic Península (Dell, 1990; this study),
the Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a; Hedley,
1911; Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990), Com-
monwealth (Hedley, 1916; Powell,
1958), Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972) and
Wilkes Land (Dell, 1990), the Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982; Dell,
1990), Kerguelen Islands (Powell, 1957;
Troncoso et al., 2001), Crozet Islands
(Powell, 1957), Enderby Land (Powell,
1958) and Syowa (Numanami et al.,
1996); from 5 m (Egorova, 1982) to 1108
m (Hain, 1990).
Subclass Orthogastropoda Ponder and Lindberg, 1996
Superorder Vetigastropoda Salvini-Plawen, 1980
Family Anatomidae McLean, 1989
Genus Anatoma Woodward, 1859
Anatoma euglypta (Pelseneer, 1903) (Fig. 5)
Scissurella euglypta Pelseneer, 1903: 17, 38, pl. 4, figs. 43-45; Thiele, 1912: 187; Melvill and Standen,
1912: 345.
50
ALDEA AND TroncOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Schizotrochus euglyptus: Powell, 1951: 79; Powell, 1958: 179; Arnaud, 1972: 113; Egorova, 1982: 11,
fig. 72; Castellanos and Landoni, 1988: 9, pl. 1, fig. 7.
Anatoma euglypta: Dell, 1990: 75, fig. 129; Hain, 1990: 33, pl. 1, fig. 1, pl. 17, fig. 1 (radula);
Numanami and Okutani, 1990a: 94, figs. 2-5; Branch, Arnaud, Cantera and Gianakouras, 1991:
58 (key); Numanami, 1996: 13, figs. 6A-C, D (radula); Zelaya, 2005: 12, fig. 5; Zelaya and
Geiger, 2007: 399, figs, 16-40, 41-47, 50 (anatomy), 48-49 (radula).
Material studied: 2 spm. (broken), MB2; 2 spm. (2.4 x 3.0 - 2.9 x 3.6 mm), MB31; 2 spm. (2.1 x 2.8 -
2.1 x 2.9 mm), MB33; 1 spm. (4.8 x 5.6 mm), MB34; 2 spm. (2.6 x 3.3 - 4.1 x 4.8 mm), MB35; 3 spm.
(2.5 x 3.5 - 4.8 x 6.1 mm), MB38; 1 spm. (1.1 x 1.7 mm), PA39; 1 spm. (0.8 x 1.2 mm), PA41; 2 spm.
(1.9 x 2.5 - 2.9 x 3.8 mm), PA42.
Remarks : Other similar species are A.
cónica (d'Orbigny, 1841), which is pro-
portionally higher and has only a Mag-
ellanic distribution (Dell, 1990), and A.
shiraseae Numanami and Okutani, 1990
which differs in having a keel on the
shoulder, a distinctive constriction
below the selenizone, and a coarser
sculpture. Thieleella amoena (Thiele, 1912)
is more globose with a stronger seleni-
zone; T. weddelliana Zelaya and Geiger,
2007 has a globular instead of a biconi-
cal last whorl, and stronger axial sculp-
ture. Also, this species has affinity in
contour and sculpture with the northern
hemisphere species, A. crispata (Fleming,
1828), cited by Watson (1886) from
Prince Edward Island, but it is a higher
and larger species with shorter seleni-
zone.In this sense, Zelaya and Geiger
(2007) in the revisión of the group,
found some of Watson's specimens
named A. crispata, which actually corre-
spond to A. euglypta.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Dell,
1990; Hain 1990; Zelaya and Geiger,
2007), South Sandwich (Zelaya and
Geiger, 2007), South Georgia (Powell,
1951; Zelaya, 2005), South Orkney
Islands (Dell, 1990) and Discovery
Bank (60° 08' S, 34° 56' W) (Zelaya and
Geiger, 2007), reaching Burdwood Bank
(Melvill and Standen, 1912; Zelaya
and Geiger, 2007), Staten Island
(Zelaya and Geiger, 2007), Cape Horn
(Dell, 1990), Drake Passage (56° 19' S,
67° 09' W) (Zelaya and Geiger, 2007),
and South Atlantic (46° S, 60° W)
(Castellanos and Landoni, 1988);
South Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990;
Zelaya and Geiger, 2007) and Western
Antarctic Península (Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990; Zelaya and Geiger, 2007;
this study), Bellingshausen Sea (70-71° S,
83-88° W) (Pelseneer, 1903) to off
Thurston Island (new record), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990; Zelaya and Geiger, 2007),
Terre Adélie (Powell, 1958; Arnaud,
1972) and Wilkes Land (Dell, 1990),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982;
Dell, 1990; Zelaya and Geiger, 2007),
Kerguelen and Crozet Islands (Cantera
and Arnaud, 1985; Zelaya and
Geiger, 2007), Enderby Land (Powell,
1958; Zelaya and Geiger, 2007), Marión
and Prince Edward Islands (Branch et
al., 1991), ca. 40° E (Griffiths, Linse
and Crame, 2003), in 24° E (Numanami
and Okutani, 1990a; Numanami, 1996)
and in 3° E-ll° E (Zelaya and Geiger,
2007); from 18 m (Dell, 1990) to 4420 m
(Zelaya and Geiger ,2007).
Family Fissurellidae Fleming, 1822
Genus Cornisepta McLean and Geiger, 1998
Cornisepta antárctica (Egorova, 1972) (Fig. 6)
Fissurisepta antárctica Egorova, 1972: 383, figs. la-b; Egorova, 1982: 10, figs. 66-67; Hain, 1990: 34,
pl. 10, fig. 6, pl. 28, fig. 8 (radula).
Cornisepta antárctica: McLean and Geiger, 1998: 20, figs. lOa-g.
Material studied: 2 spm. (2.8 x 2.0 - 3.4 x 3.1 mm), MB14.
51
Iberas, 26 (2), 2008
Remarks : Although it has a Fis-
surisepta shell form, McLean and
Geiger (1998), described the new genus
Cornisepta from this species, mainly by
its radular characteristics. There are no
similar species in Antárctica.
Distribution : Only known from the
Weddell (Hain ' 1990; McLean and
Geiger 1998), Bellingshausen (new
record) and Davis Seas (Egorova, 1972,
1982); from 280 m to 700 m (Egorova,
1972).
Genus Puncturella Lowe, 1827
Puncturella spirigera Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 7)
Puncturella spirigera Thiele, 1912: 186, pl. 11, figs. 4-10; Powell, 1958: 180; Egorova, 1982: 10, figs.
24 (radula), 68-70; Dell, 1990: 76, figs. 125, 127; Numanami et al. , 1996: 211 (table), pl. 1, figs 1-2;
Zelaya, 2005: 112, fig. 4.
Material studied: 5 spm. (3.9 x 2.8 - 6.2 x 4.1 mm), PA39.
Remarks : This species was frequently
considered as a júnior synonym of the
Sub-Antarctic, widely distributed
species P. cónica (d'Orbigny, 1841) (see
Arnaud, 1972; Hain, 1990; Reíd and
Osorio, 2000), although Dell (1990)
commented that P. spirigera probably
formed part of a complex with wide dis-
tribution. These specimens are consid-
ered ,therefore, as P. spirigera until a sys-
tematic revisión of the genus in the
Southern Ocean and neighboring areas
is attempted. Individuáis from the
Weddell Sea at 16-820 m depth of Hain
(1990, p. 34), that were assigned to P.
cónica, resemble these specimens.
Distribution: South Georgia Island
(Dell, 1990; Zelaya, 2005), also cited for
the Weddell Sea and the South Shetland
Islands (Zelaya, 2005); Western Antarc-
tic Peninsula (new record), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Powell,
1958), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), from 71° E to Enderby
(Powell, 1958) and Syowa (Numanami
et AL., 1996); from 60 m (Egorova, 1982)
to 2804 m (Dell, 1990). The references of
Griffiths et al. (2003) for several sites
in the South Pacific from ca. 42° S and
Marión, Prince Edward, Crozet and Ker-
guelen Islands, may be related to P.
cónica.
Family Trochidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Antimargarita Powell, 1951
Antimargarita smithiana (Hedley, 1916) (Fig. 8)
Submargarita smithiana Hedley, 1916: 38, pl. 5, fig. 58.
Antimargarita smithiana: Powell, 1951: 100; 1958: 183; Egorova, 1982: 19, fig. 95.
Material studied: 1 spm. (7.4 x 8.0 mm), MB35.
Remarks: It differs from A. dulcís
(Smith, 1907) mainly by its more spiral
cords, which are similar in solidity.
Distribution: Known from East
Antárctica, ca. 160° E (Griffiths et
ae., 2003), Commonwealth (Powell,
1958), Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley
,1916) and Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982),
in West Antárctica only in the Belling-
shausen Sea (new record); from 30 m
(Powell, 1958) to 1117 m (new
record).
52
ALDEA and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Genus Calliotropis Seguenza, 1903
Calliotropis antárctica Dell, 1990 (Fig. 9)
Calliotropis antárctica Dell, 1990: 86, figs. 136-137, 143.
Material studied: 1 spm. (7.8 x 9.8 mm), MB2; 2 spm. (8.0 x 11.0 - 10.5 x 13.6 mm), MB34; 1 spm.
(8.1 x 10.2 mm), MB37.
Remarks : Among the species within
this genus, described from around
Antárctica , the most closely related
species is C. lateumbilicata Dell, 1990,
which possesses a wider umbilicus and
a lower spire with smoother sculpture.
Calliotropis eltanini Dell, 1990 has less
convex whorls with a more conic and
angulose shape and C. pelseneeri ( sensu
lato) differs by its occluded or semi-
occluded umbilicus and higher spire.
Distribution : Only reported from the
Western Antarctic Península (64° S, 68°
W) (Dell, 1990), Bellingshausen Sea to
off Thurston Island (new records), and
the Bouvet Island (Linse, 2006); from
247 m (Linse, 2006) to 2818 m (Dell,
1990).
Calliotropis pelseneeri Cernohorsky, 1977 (Fig. 10)
Calliotropis pelseneeri Cernohorsky, 1977: 106; Hain, 1990: 37, pl. 1, fig. 5, pl. 17, fig. 5 (radula).
Calliotropis pelseneeri pelseneeri Dell, 1990: 82, fig. 131.
Margarita lamellosa Pelseneer, 1903: 18, pl. 5, fig. 47.
Solariellopis? lamellosa: Thiele, 1912: 187, pl. 11, fig. 12.
Calliotropis lamellosa: Powell, 1958: 182; Egorova, 1982: 14, fig. 76.
Material studied: 1 sh. (broken), MB4; 4 spm. (5.1 x 5.3 - 10.5 x 12.0 mm), MB30; 3 spm. (7.0 x 8.3 -
9.9 x 11.0 mm), MB31; 1 spm. (4.2 x 4.5 mm), MB35.
Remarks: Dell (1990) reported C.
pelseneeri Cernohorsky, 1977 as C. pelse-
neeri pelseneeri in order to describe the
new subspecies C. pelseneeri rossiana
Dell, 1990, that differs by its more angu-
lose whorls "with the major spiral
sculpture much more prominent" (Dell,
1990). Individuáis collected in
BENTART cruises, were reported as C.
pelseneeri ( s.l ) because of their more
angulose whorls with a major spiral
cord, but these specimens possess
several grades in rising and thickness
without being possible to observe a
clearcut difference between these. The
last whorl has a second principal spiral
cord and the occluded or semi-occluded
umbilicus is the main character that sep-
arates it from C. eltanini Dell, 1990, with
an open umbilicus.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Dell,
1990; Hain, 1990), Bellingshausen Sea
(Pelseneer, 1903; this study), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982) and
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958); from 371
m (Hain, 1990) to 1814 m (new record).
Genus Margarella Thiele, 1893
Margarella antárctica (Lamy, 1905) (Fig. 11)
Margarita antárctica Lamy, 1905: 481, fig. 5; 1906b: 9, pl. 1, figs. 2-4.
Valvatella antárctica: Melvill and Standen, 1907: 129; Lamy, 1911a: 13.
Margarella antárctica: Powell, 1951: 98, fig. G9 (radula); Linse, 2002: 69, pl. 2, fig. 9.1.1- 13, 14-16
(radula); Zelaya, 2004: 113 (table), fig. 8 (radula).
53
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Margantes antárctica: Dell, 1990: 79 (text), fig. 178.
Material studied: 8 spm. (3.7 x 4.8 - 8.0 x 10.8 mm), MAR.
Remarks : The low spire and open
umbilicus sepárate it from the other two
species of this genus reported from West
Antárctica: the deeper water species
Margarella refulgens (Smith, 1907), and
M. whiteana Linse, 2002, which also
differs by having spiral ribs. However,
there are others species confined to
South Georgia Island (see Zelaya, 2005),
such as M. achilles (Strebel, 1908), M.
jason Powell, 1951, M. obsoleta Powell,
1951, M. steineni (Strebel, 1905), M. sub-
antarctica (Strebel, 1908) and M. tropi-
dophoroides (Strebel, 1908).
Distribution : West Antarctica,only
from the South Orkney (Melvill and
Standen, 1907; Powell, 1951; Linse,
2002) and South Shetland Islands
(Powell, 1951), Western Antarctic
Península (Lamy, 1906b, 1911a; Thiele,
1912; Powell, 1951; Linse, 2002; this
study) and the Bellingshausen Sea (70°
S, 81° W) (Lamy, 1911a); from 0 m
(Powell, 1951) to 460 m (Lamy, 1911a).
Margarella refulgens (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 12)
Valvatella refulgens Smith, 1907a: 11, pl. 2, fig. 7; Hedley, 1911: 4.
Margarella refulgens: Thiele, 1912: 188; Smith, 1915: 64; Hedley, 1916: 37; Eales, 1923: 9; Powell,
1958: 182; Egorova, 1982: 16, figs. 28 (radula), 82; Hain, 1990: 38, pl. 1, fig. 7, pl. 17, figs. 7-8
(radula).
Margantes refulgens: Arnaud, 1972: 115, figs. 2 (anatomy), 5 (radula); Dell, 1990: 78, figs. 175-177;
Numanami, 1996: 25, figs. 12A-E, F (radula).
Material studied: 3 spm. (3.7 x 4.1 - 4.6 x 6.0 mm), PI8; 6 spm. (2.2 x 2.6 - 5.7 x 6.2 mm), PA20; 2
spm. (3.5 x 4.3 - 5.6 x 6.1 mm), PA22; 1 spm. (4.0 x 4.7 mm), PA39; 1 spm. (4.3 x 5.0 mm), LOW.
Remarks : It differs from Margarella
antárctica by its narrow or semi-
occluded umbilicus and higher spire.
Although this species has been cited as
Margantes or Margarella, Zelaya (2004)
indicates that the constancy of five
lateral teeth of the radula and the mor-
phology of the first marginal tooth with
a base that is greatly enlarged laterally,
but with a well-developed shaft and
cutting edge, place the species in genus
Margarella. Those characteristics were
observed on radulae detailed by
Arnaud (1972), Egorova (1982) and
Hain (1990). Conversely, in Margantes
the number of lateral teeth varíes and
the first marginal tooth is represented
by an expanded píate, without cutting
edge. Numanami (1996) described Mar-
gantes gunnerusensis and Margarites
biconicus from East Antárctica, with
characteristics that clearly sepárate them
from M. refulgens, such as periostracum
and angulose whorls, respectively.
(Right page) Figure 2. Nacella polaris concinna, 29.6 x 20.5 mm, PA20. Figure 3. Nacella polaris
polaris , 29.8 x 20.5 mm, MAR. Figure 4. Iothia coppingeri, 5.7 x 4.1 mm, PA22. Figure 5.
Anatoma euglypta, 4.8 x 6.1 mm, MB38. Figure 6. Cornisepta antárctica , 2.8 x 2.0, MB14. Figure
7. Puncturella spirigera, 5.6 x 3.6 mm, PA39. Figure 8. Antimargarita smithiana , 7.4 x 8.0 mm,
MB35. Figure 9. Calliotropis antárctica, 7.8 x 9.8 mm, MB2. Figure 10. Calliotropis pelseneeri, í 0.5
x 12.0 mm, MB30. Figure 11. Margarella antárctica, 9.1 x 6.8 mm, MAR. Figure 12. Margarella
refulgens, 3.7 x 4.1 mm, PI8. Figure 13. Solariella antárctica, 3.9 x 4.1 mm, MB11. Figure 14.
Tropidomarga biangulata, 6.9 x 8.0 mm, LOW. Figure 15. Cirsonella extrema, 2.5 x 2.7 mm, PA39.
Figure 16. Liotella endeavourensis, 0.9 x 1.7 mm, MB38.
(Página derecha) Figuras 2-16. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
54
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
55
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Distribution : Presumably Circum-
antarctic. South Sandwich Islands (Dell
1990), Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990), Magel-
lan (Thiele, 1912), South Shetland
Islands, Western Antarctic Península
and Peter I Island (new records), Ross
Sea (Smith, 1907a; Hedley, 1911; Smith,
1915; Dell, 1990), ca. 163° E (Smith,
1915), Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916),
Terre Adélie (Powell, 1958; Arnaud,
1972), Wilkes Land (Dell, 1990), Davis
Sea (Thiele, 1912; Hedley, 1916; Powell,
1958; Egorova, 1982; Dell, 1990), Ker-
guelen Islands (Thiele,1912), Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958), ca. 40°E, Prince
Edward Island (Griffiths et al., 2003)
and 24°E (Numanami, 1996); from 0 m
(Arnaud, 1972) to 1108 m (Hain, 1990).
Dell (1990) doubts the distribution
boundaries, due to records of some
specimens reported as M. antárctica from
some localities cióse to the South Sand-
wich Islands; but they could correspond
to M. refulgens.
Genus Solariella Wood, 1842
Solariella antárctica Powell, 1958 (Fig. 13)
Solariella antárctica Powell, 1958: 183, pl. 2, fig. 4; Dell, 1990: 98, fig. 147.
Material studied: 1 spm. (3.9 x 4.1 mm), MB11.
Remarles: The individual reported by
Hain (1990 p. 40) as Solariella sp. resem-
bles BENTART specimen. Other
described species are Solariella kempi
Powell, 1951, S. charopus charopus
(Watson, 1879), S. charopus caeruleus
(Watson, 1879) and S. bathy antárctica
Numanami, 1996, all of them with more
or finer and denser spiral cords.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Griffiths
et al., 2003), Bellingshausen Sea (new
record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990) and
Kemp Land (Powell, 1958); from 455 m
(Dell, 1990) to 1289 m (new record).
Genus Tropidomarga Powell, 1951
Tropidomarga biangulata Powell, 1951 (Fig. 14)
Tropidomarga biangulata Powell, 1951: 101, pl. 5, figs. 5, G6 (radula); Castellanos and Landoni,
1989: 26, pl. 2, fig. 6; Zelaya, 2005: 115.
Material studied: 1 spm. (6.9 x 8.0 mm), LOW.
Distribution: Only in the South Georgia Islands (Powell, 1951; this study); from 97
(Powell, 1951) and the South Shetland m (new record) to 342 m (Powell, 1951).
Family Skeneidae Clark, 1851
Genus Cirsonella Angas, 1877
Cirsonella extrema Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 15)
Cirsonella extrema Thiele, 1912: 191, pl. 11, fig. 23; Powell, 1951: 103; 1958: 184; Egorova, 1982: 21,
fig. 99; Dell, 1990: 99, fig. 160; Numanami, 1996: 43, figs. 22A-D, F (radula).
Material studied: 4 spm. (2.0 x 2.2 - 2.4 x 3.0 mm), PA39.
56
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Remarks : Together with this species,
only Cirsonella kerguelenensis Thiele, 1912
was cited from the Southern Ocean and
neighboring areas, but C. extrema differs
by having a lower spire.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Griffiths
et al., 2003), South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Penín-
sula (new record), Ross Sea (Powell,
1951; Dell, 1990), Wilkes Land (Dell,
1990), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova,
1982; Dell, 1990), Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958) and 24° E (Numanami,
1996); from 15 to 870 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Liotella Iredale, 1915
Liotella endeavourensis Dell, 1990 (Fig. 16)
Liotella endeavourensis Dell, 1990: 103, figs. 172-173.
Material studied: 1 spm. (0.9 x 1.7 mm), MB38.
Remarks: The only Antarctic repre-
sentativo known. According to Dell
(1990) it presents a certain likeness to
species from Southern New Zealand,
and differs from them in the sunken
spire and by having a pair of raised
spiral cords in the last whorl.
Distribution : Only known from the Ross
Sea at 362 m (Dell, 1990) and Belling-
shausen Sea at 1324 m (new record).
Family Turbinidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Leptocollonia Powell, 1951
Leptocollonia innocens (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 17)
Leptothyra innocens Thiele, 1912: 192, pl. 11, figs. 24, 24a.
Leptocollonia innocens: Powell, 1951: 105; 1958; 183; Egorova, 1982: 20, figs. 32 (radula), 90; Dell,
1990: 98, figs. 161-162; Hain, 1990: 41, pl. 2, fig. 1, pl. 18, figs. 7-8 (radula); Numanami, 1996: 57,
figs. 31A-D, E (operculum), F (radula).
Material studied: 6 spm. (2.8 x 3.9 - 6.0 x 6.3 mm), MB37.
Remarks: L. thielei Powell, 1951, from
South Georgia Island, is the only other
species known from the area, but L.
innocens differs mainly by having fewer
spiral cords on the spire and last whorl.
Distribution: Weddell (Dell, 1990;
Hain, 1990), Bellingshausen (new
record), Ross (Dell, 1990) and Davis
Seas (Thiele 1912; Powell, 1958;
Egorova, 1982), Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958), 34° E and 24° E
(Numanami, 1996); from 193 m
(Powell, 1958) to 673 m (Hain,
1990).
Superorder Caenogastropoda Cox, 1960
Family Zerotulidae Warén and Hain, 1996
Genus Dickdellia Warén and Hain, 1996
Dickdellia labioflecta (Dell, 1990) (Fig. 18)
Laevilitorina labioflecta Dell, 1990: 110, figs. 187-188.
Dickdellia labioflecta: Warén and Hain, 1996: 321, figs. 27-29, 30a-b, 31-32, 34e.
Mesogastropoda sp. 2: Hain, 1990: 54, pl. 5, figs. la-d, pl. 22, fig. 6 (radula).
57
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Material studied: 10 spm. (2.8 x 3.1 - 2.9 x 3.4 mm), PA22; 3 spm. (3.1 x 3.6 - 3.2 x 3.7 mm), MAR.
Remarte: It differs from littorinid species
by having a less calcified shell and more glo-
bose aperture. Juveniles live as ectoparasites
on the cuticle of the pycnogonid Colossendeis
megalonyx megalonyx (Lehmann, Gailer,
Melzer and Schwabe, 2007).
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990;
Warén and Hain, 1996), South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic
Península (new record) and Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990); from 220 to 891 m (Dell,
1990).
Family Eatoniellidae Ponder, 1965
Genus Eatoniella Dalí, 1876
Eatoniella glacialis (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 19)
Rissoia glacialis Smith, 1907a: 9, pl. 2, fig. 4; Smith, 1915: 65.
Rissoa glacialis : Hedley, 1911: 5.
Subonoba glacialis : Hedley, 1916: 48.
Eatoniella glacialis: Arnaud, 1972: 118, figs. 8 (radula), 11 (operculum); Ponder, 1983: 11, figs. 2c,
5e; Dell, 1990: 111, fig. 191; Numanami, 1996: 62, figs. 34A-B, C (operculum), D (radula);
Zelaya, 2005: 115, fig. 14.
Eatoniella kerguelensis f. major Strebel, 1908: 57, pl. 4, figs. 56a-c.
Material studied: 1 spm. (2.8 x 1.9 mm), PA21; 2 spm. (2.0 x 1.1 - 2.8 x 1.6 mm), PA39.
Remarks: Its resemblance to E. kergue-
lenensis ( s.l .) was discussed by Ponder
(1983), who found that the species
Eatoniella kerguelensis f. major Strebel,
1908, from the Western Antarctic Penín-
sula is a júnior synonym of E. glacialis.
Distribution: Circumantarctic. Weddell
Sea (Dell, 1990), South Georgia Island
(Zelaya, 2005), South Shetland Islands
(Strebel, 1908; Dell, 1990) and Western
Antarctic Península (Strebel, 1908; Dell,
1990; this study), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a;
Hedley 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990),
Cape Adare (Smith, 1915), Balleny Islands
(Griffiths et al., 2003), Commonwealth
(Hedley, 1916), Terre Adélie (Arnaud,
1972) and Enderby Land (Dell, 1990), 24°
E (Numanami, 1996) and ca. 40° E (Grif-
fiths et al., 2003); from 6 m (Arnaud,
1972) to 870 m (Dell, 1990).
Eatoniella kerguelenensis regularis (Smith, 1915) (Fig. 20)
Rissoia regularis Smith, 1915: 65, pl. 1, fig. 5.
Eatoniella kerguelenensis regularis: Ponder, 1983: 7, figs. 2b, 3a-c; Dell, 1990: 113, fig. 190; Branch et
al., 1991: 57 (key); Numanami, 1996: 65, figs. 36A-B, C (operculum), D (radula).
Eatoniella regularis: Castellanos, 1989: 26, pl. 2, fig. 26.
Eatoniella kerguelenensis (Smith): Lamy, 1906b: 7; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 134; Lamy, 1911a: 11;
Hedley, 1916: 46; Arnaud, 1972: 118, figs. 9 (radula), 11 (operculum) (no Smith, 1875).
Eatoniella kerguelensis f. major Strebel: Melvill and Standen, 1912: 351; Powell, 1951: 110 (no
Strebel, 1908).
Material studied: 2 spm. (3.5 x 2.0 - 4.0 x 2.2 mm), PA20.
Remarks: It differs from the similar
subspecies E. kerguelenensis kerguele-
nensis (Smith, 1875) by having a shell
that is usually larger, thicker, with
flatter whorls and a higher spire of 1 / 2
or 1 whorl more. There are the same
differences, though more evident, with
other species,such as E. glacialis
(Smith, 1907) and E. demissa (Smith,
1915).
58
ALDEA and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Distribution : Weddell Sea and South
Georgia Island (Griffiths et al., 2003),
South Orkney Islands (Melvill and
Standen, 1907, 1912; Powell, 1951),
South Atlantic Ocean (Castellanos,
1989) and Falkland /Malvinas Islands
(Carcelles, 1953), South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic
Península (Lamy ,1906b; Dell, 1990; this
study), Ross Sea (Smith, 1915; Dell,
1990) to Cape Adare (Smith, 1915),
Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916), Terre
Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Wilkes Land
and ca. 63° E (Dell, 1990), Marión and
Prince Edward Islands (Branch et al.,
1991) , ca. 40° E (Griffiths et al., 2003)
and 24° E (Numanami, 1996); from 0 m
(Dell, 1990) to 457 m (Smith, 1915).
Eatoniella cf. kerguelenensis kerguelenensis (Smith, 1875) (Fig. 21)
Eatonia kerguelenensis Smith, 1875: 70.
Eatoniella kerguelenensis kerguelenensis: Smith, 1879: 174, pl. 9, fig. 10; Powell, 1957: 129; 1958: 185;
Arnaud, 1972: 118 (in part); Ponder, 1983: 11, figs. 2a, 7e-f; Troncoso et al. 2001: 92, figs. 10, 43
(radula).
Eatoniella kerguelensis (sic): Thiele, 1912: 235, pl. 14, fig. 26, pl. 16, fig. 1 (radula); Castellanos, 1989:
23, pl. 2, fig. 22, pl. 4, fig. 45.
Material studied: 14 spm. (1.4 x 1.0 - 3.0 x 1.8 mm), PA39; 1 spm. (1.6 x 1.1 mm), PA41.
Remarks : Although Ponder (1983)
restricted E. kerguelenensis kerguelenensis
to East Antárctica, Castellanos (1989)
presented a specimen from the Antarctic
Peninsula, which was clearly different
from E. kerguelenensis regularis. Likewise,
our specimens differ by having a
usually smaller shell, thinner, with more
convex whorls and with a shorter spire
of 1 ¡i or 1 whorl less.
Distribution: Mainly in East Antárc-
tica. Known from Commonwealth (Pow-
ell, 1958), Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972)
and Kerguelen Islands (Smith, 1879;
Thiele, 1912; Powell, 1957; Troncoso
et al., 2001). Also from the Western
Antarctic Peninsula (this study). Castel-
lanos (1989) assigned a widespread
Antarctic and Sub- Antarctic distribution
in South Georgia, South Orkney Islands
and Antarctic Peninsula, and Griffiths
et al. (2003) added the Weddell Sea. The
bathymetric range is from 0 m (Powell,
1957) to 100 m (Powell, 1960).
Family Rissoidae Gray, 1847
Genus Onoba H. and A. Adams, 1852
Onoba gélida (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 22)
Rissoia gélida Smith, 1907a: 9, pl. 2, fig. 5; Smith, 1915: 65.
Rissoa gélida: Hedley, 1911: 5; Thiele, 1912: 195, pl. 11, figs. 37-38.
Subonoba gélida: Hedley, 1916: 48; Powell, 1958: 185; Arnaud, 1972: 121; Egorova, 1982: 24, figs. 37
(radula), 108-109.
Onoba gélida: Ponder, 1983: 20, figs. 13a-b, 16a-d; Dell, 1990: 114, fig. 194; Ponder and Worsfold,
1994: 54; Numanami, 1996: 66, figs. 38A-B; Zelaya, 2005: 116, fig. 16.
Subonoba contigua Powell, 1958: 184, pl. 1, fig. 8.
Material studied: 6 spm. (1.8 x 1.1 - 2.4 x 1.8 mm), PI5; 4 spm. (2.1 x 1.4 - 2.7 x 1.7 mm), PI8; 1 spm.
(2.6 x 1.4 mm), MB14; 1 spm. (2.2 x 1.6 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (2.0 x 1.1 mm), MB34; 9 spm. (1.1 x 0.8 -
3.0 x 1.9 mm), PA39; 3 spm. (1.3 x 1.0 - 1.7 x 1.1 mm), PA41; 3 spm. (1.2 x 1.0 - 1.4 x 1.1 mm), PA42;
1 spm. (2.1 x 1.5 mm), LOW.
59
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Remarks : Several Antarctic and Sub-
Antarctic species, sharing wide shape and
spiral sculpture ha ve been cited. In this
respect, O. scythei (Philippi, 1868) from
Tierra del Fuego Island has a great affin-
ity in macrosculpture, though more elon-
gate. O. filostria (Melvill and Standen,
1912), O. suavis (Thiele, 1925), O. transenna
(Watson, 1886), O. subantarctica subantarc-
tica (Thiele, 1912) and O. subantarctica
wilkesiana (Hedley, 1916), differ by having
more spirals; on the other hand, O. delecta
Ponder, 1983 and O. paucicarinata Ponder,
1983, have less spirals. O. inflatella (Thiele,
1912) differs in having a widely open
umbilicus and more spaced spirals and O.
grísea (Martens, 1885) by flatter cords.
Ponder (1983) synonymized the species
Subonoba contigua Powell, 1958.
Distribution : South Georgia Island
(Ponder and Worsfold, 1994; Zelaya,
2005) and cited for the Weddell Sea
(Zelaya, 2005); South Shetland Islands
(Ponder, 1983; Dell, 1990; this study).
Western Antarctic Península, Belling-
shausen Sea and Peter I Island (new
records), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a;
Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990)
to Cape Adare (Smith, 1915), Common-
wealth (Hedley, 1916; Powell, 1958),
Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Wilkes
Land (Dell, 1990), Davis Sea (Thiele,
1912; Egorova, 1982; Dell, 1990),
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), ca. 40° E
(Griffiths et al ., 2003), 24° E
(Numanami, 1996) and Bouvet Island
(Linse, 2006); from 4 m (Dell, 1990) to
1272 m (new record).
Onoba kergueleni (Smith, 1875) (Fig. 23)
Rissoa kergueleni Smith, 1875: 69; 1879: 176, pl. 9, fig. 12; Thiele, 1912: 238, pl. 14, fig. 30.
Onoba kergueleni: Ponder, 1983: 17, figs. 12f-h, 18 e-g; Dell, 1990: 115, fig. 196.
Rissoa adarensis Smith, 1902: 205, pl. 24, fig. 17; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 132; Hedley, 1911: 5;
Lamy, 1911a: 10.
Rissoia adarensis: Smith, 1907a: 8, pl. 2, fig. 2; Smith, 1915: 65.
Ovirissoa adarensis: Hedley, 1916: 47; Arnaud, 1972: 120.
? Rissoa columna Pelseneer, 1903: 21, pl. 5, fig. 55.
Rissoa observationis Thiele, 1912: 239, pl. 15, fig. 4.
Material studied: 1 spm. (3.0 x 1.4 mm), PI8.
Remarks : The extremely thin and
transparent periostracum marks the dif-
ference with all species with smooth
surface known for the area, such as O.
anderssoni (Strebel, 1908), O. georgiana
(Pfeffer, 1886) and O. melvilli (Hedley,
1916), these last two also with weak
spirals. Rissoa adarensis Smith, 1902, R.
columna Pelseneer, 1903 and R. observa-
tionis Thiele, 1912 were synonymized by
Ponder (1983); the last two species were
described from immature specimens.
Distribution: Circumantarctic. South
Orkney (Melvill and Standen, 1907)
and Signy Islands (Ponder, 1983), South
Shetland Islands (Ponder, 1983; Dell,
1990), Western Antarctic Península
(Lamy, 1911a) and Bellingshausen Sea
(70° S, 83° W) (Pelseneer, 1903), Peter I
Island (new record), Ross Sea (Smith,
1907a; Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell,
1990), Cape Adare (Smith, 1902), Com-
monwealth (Hedley, 1916), Terre Adélie
(Arnaud, 1972) and Wilkes Land (Dell,
1990), Kerguelen Islands (Smith, 1879),
Crozet Island and Mac Robertson Land
(Dell, 1990); from 0 m (Arnaud, 1972)
to 870 m (Dell, 1990).
Onoba turqueti (Lamy, 1905) (Fig. 24)
Rissoia turqueti Lamy, 1905: 479, fig. 3; 1906b: 6, pl. 1, fig. 8.
Rissoa turqueti: Melvill and Standen, 1912: 350.
Subonoba turqueti: Powell, 1951: 55; Arnaud, 1972: 121.
60
ALDEA AND TroncoSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Onoba turqueti : Ponder, 1983: 16, figs. llf-g, 12a-e, 14c-e; Dell, 1990: 114, fig. 195; Ponder and
Worsfold, 1994: 54.
Rissoia fraudulenta Smith, 1907a: 9, pl. 2, fig. 3.
Rissoa fraudulenta: Melvill and Standen, 1907: 133; Thiele, 1912: 194, pl. 11, fig. 35.
Subonoba fraudulenta: Powell, 1951: 110; Egorova,
Subonoba bickertoni Hedley, 1916: 47, pl. 7, fig. 76.
Material studied: 2 spm. (1.8 x 1.0 - 2.1 x 1.1 mm
Remarks : The spiral sculpture is one
of the main characters that differentiate
Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic species
with a common elongate shape. In this
sense, O. sulcula Ponder and Worsfold,
1994 differs in having threads inter-
rupted by dot-like marks, O. schraderi
(Strebel, 1908) by its triple threads, O.
sactipauli (Vélain, 1877) and O. egorovae
Numanami, 1996 by their weaker
threads, O. steineni (Strebel, 1908) and O.
protofimbriata Ponder and Worsfold,
1994 by their thicker ridges and O. lantzi
(Vélain, 1877), although having a similar
sculpture, differs in having shouldered
whorls. Rissoia fraudulenta Smith,
1907 and Subonoba bickertoni Hedley,
!: 23, figs. 36 (radula), 111.
1916 were synonymized by Ponder
(1983).
Distribution: Cited ca. 10° W (Griffiths
et al ., 2003); Burdwood Bank (Melvill
and Standen, 1912), South Georgia
(Ponder and Worsfold, 1994), South
Orkney (Melvill and Standen, 1907;
Powell, 1951), Signy (Ponder 1983) and
South Shetland Islands (Ponder, 1983;
Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Lamy, 1905, 1906b; Dell, 1990), Peter I
Island (new record), Ross Sea (Smith,
1907a; Dell, 1990), Macquarie Island
(Powell, 1951), Commonwealth (Hedley,
1916), Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972) and
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912, Egorova, 1982);
from 2 to 385 m (Egorova, 1982).
Genus Powellisetia Ponder, 1965
Powellisetia deserta (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 25)
Rissoia deserta Smith, 1907a: 9, pl. 2, fig. 1.
Rissoa deserta: Thiele, 1912: 194, pl. 11, fig. 33; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 349.
Subonoba deserta: Hedley, 1916: 48; Powell, 1951: 62; Powell, 1958: 185; Arnaud, 1972: 120;
Egorova, 1982: 23, figs. 35 (radula), 110.
Powellisetia deserta: Ponder, 1983: 24, figs. 19a-c, 21c; Dell, 1990: 116, fig. 197; Numanami, 1996: 71,
figs. 43A-C, D (radula).
Material studied: 2 spm. (2.2 x 1.2 - 2.8 x 1.8 mm
Remarks : The size and shape are the
main characters that allow the differenti-
ation of several species without any spi-
ral sculpture. P. principis (Watson, 1886) is
a tiny species that does not reach more
than 2.1 mm, P. australis (Watson, 1886)
and P. inornata (Strebel, 1908) differ in
having a more elongated shape. P. pelse-
neeri (Thiele, 1912), that was described as
a new ñame for Rissoa subtruncata Pelse-
neer, 1903, from the Bellingshausen Sea,
differs by having finer spiral striae.
Distribution : Cited ca. 10° W (Grif-
fiths et al., 2003); South Orkney
(Melvill and Standen, 1912) and
Signy Islands (Ponder, 1983), Western
Antarctic Peninsula (new record), Ross
Sea (Smith, 1907a; Ponder, 1983;
Dell, 1990), Commonwealth (Hedley,
1916; Powell, 1958), Terre Adélie
(Arnaud, 1972); Wilkes Land (Dell,
1990), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), ca. 60°E (Griffiths et
al., 2003), Enderby Land (Powell,
1958), ca. 50° E and 40° E (Griffiths et
al., 2003) and 24° E (Numanami,
1996); from 4 m (Ponder, 1983) to 870
m (Dell, 1990).
61
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Family C apulid ae Fleming, 1822
Genus Torellia Lovén in Jeffreys, 1867
Torellia insignis (Smith, 1915) (Fig. 26)
Neoconcha insignis Smith, 1915: 68, pl. 1, fig. 9; Eales, 1923: 13, fig. 11; Arnaud, 1972: 123;
Numanami and Okutani, 1990b: 87, figs. 2C-D, 3A (radula), 5A; Numanami, 1996: 89, figs.
58A-B, D, C (radula).
Torellia insignis : Warén, Arnaud and Cantera, 1986: 163 (text), fig. 6; Dell, 1990: 135, fig. 229-230;
Hain, 1990: 48, pl. 3, fig. 1, pl. 20, fig. 6 (radula).
Material studied: 1 spm. (16.9 x 21.0 mm), LOW.
Remarles: The higher spire, and very
thick periostracum, rather lamellose
along the growth lines and raised into
long, divergent hairy processes on the
shoulder and on the spiral carinae, sepa-
rates T. insignis from the other Antarctic
and Sub-Antarctic species: T. mirabilis
(Smith, 1907), T. planispira (Smith, 1915),
T. exilis (Powell, 1958), T. smithi Warén,
Cantera and Arnaud, 1986, T. angulifera
Warén, Cantera and Arnaud, 1986 and T.
cornea Powell, 1951. Numanami and
Okutani (1990b) have studied and com-
pared this species with the most similar
species T. lanata Warén, Arnaud and Can-
tera, 1986, from the Kerguelen Islands,
that differs in having a more angulose
aperture. T. antárctica (Thiele, 1912) dif-
fers in having a more dense sculpture
and less developed periostracum.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Shetland Islands (new
record), Ross Sea (Smith, 1915; Dell,
1990), Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), ca.
40°E (Grilliths et al ., 2003) and 24° E
(Numanami and Okutani, 1990b;
Numanami, 1996); from 91 m (Dell,
1990) to 695 m (Hain, 1990).
Torellia mirabilis (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 27)
Trichoconcha mirabilis Smith, 1907a: 6, pl. 1, figs. 7-7b; Hedley, 1916: 50; Eales, 1923: 14; Powell,
1951: 124; Castellanos and Landoni, 1990: 7, pl. 3, fig. 35; Hain, 1990: 46, pl. 2, figs. 12a-e, pl. 20,
figs. 1-2 (radula).
Torellia mirabilis: Thiele, 1912: 197; Smith, 1915: 68; Warén et al., 1986: 163 (text); Dell, 1990: 131, figs.
222-225; Numanami and Okutani, 1990b: figs. 2E-F; Numanami, 1996: 92 (table), figs. 60A-B, C
(radula); Numanami et al, 1996: 211 (table), pl. 1, figs. 10-11; Zelaya, 2005: 119, fig. 25.
Material studied: 1 spm. (22.0 x 30.0 mm), PA39.
Remarles : Together with T. planispira
(Smith, 1915) and T. cornea Powell, 1951,
there are the three species with low
spire, but T. planispira has strong spiral
carinae instead of the rounded shape of
T. mirabilis, and T. cornea has a broader
and depressed aperture, not rounded as
in T. mirabilis.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Georgia (Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990; Zelaya, 2005) and South
Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990), Western
Antarctic Peninsula (new record), Ross
Sea (Smith, 1907a; Smith, 1915; Dell,
1990), Commonwealth to Terre Adélie
(Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Hedley, 1916); also is indicated from
Kerguelen and Crozet Islands (Zelaya,
2005); Enderby Land (Numanami et^al.,
1996); from 70 to 1120 m (Dell, 1990).
Torellia planispira (Smith, 1915) (Fig. 28)
Trichotropis planispira Smith, 1915: 67, pl. 1, fig. 7.
62
ALDEA and TRONCOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Trichoconcha planispira: Powell, 1958: 188; Hain, 1990: 47, pl. 2, fig. 13, pl. 20, fig. 3 (radula).
Torellia planispira: Warén et al., 1986: 163 (text); Dell, 1990: 134; Numanami and Okutani, 1990b:
82, figs. 2A-B, 3B (radula), 5B; Numanami, 1996: 86, figs. 56A-B, D, C (radula).
Material studied: 3 spm. (2.6 x 3.9 - 3.7 x 5.3 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (4.0 x 5.8 mm), PA24.
Remarks: Numanami and Okutani
(1990b) observed that its semi-detached
whorls of the teleoconch allow differen-
tiation from other related species.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), cited for the South Shetland
Islands (Griffiths et al., 2003); Western
Antarctic Península (new record), Ross
Sea (Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990), Mac
Robertson Land (Powell, 1958), ca. 40°
E (Griffiths et al., 2003) and 24° E
(Numanami and Okutani, 1990b,
Numanami, 1996); from 107 to 1056 m
(new records).
Family Velutinidae Gray, 1840
Genus Marseniopsis Bergh, 1886
Marseniopsis cónica (Smith, 1902)
Lamellaria cónica Smith, 1902: 206, pl. 24, fig. 4; Strebel, 1908: 60.
Marseniopsis cónica: Smith, 1915: 66, Eales, 1923: 23; Egorova, 1982: 27, figs. 132-135; Dell, 1990:
164; Hain, 1990: 52, pl. 4, figs. 2a-c, pl. 21, figs. 7-8 (radula); Numanami and Okutani, 1991: 53,
figs. 4A-E, 9A (radula); Numanami, 1996: 93, figs. 61A-E, 66A (radula).
Lamellariosis turqueti Vayssiére, 1906: 40, pl. 4, figs. 42-53.
Material studied: 1 spm. (14.7 x 8.9 mm), PA21.
Remarks: It can be differentiated from
the other two representatives of the
genus in the area by its heterogeneous
and rough mantle with numerous mam-
millate processes, giving a polygonal
contour; it does not have an elliptic
shape like M. mollis (Smith, 1902) and
M. syowaensis Numanami and Okutani,
1991. According to Numanami and
Okutani (1991) Lamellariosis turqueti
Vayssiére, 1906 is a júnior synonym.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990) and Eastern Antarctic Peninsula
(Strebel, 1908), Western Antarctic
Peninsula (new record), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990), Cape Adare
(Smith, 1902), probably in the Mac-
quarie Island (Tomlin 1948 in Powell,
1960), Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982), Mac
Robertson Land and 24° E (Numanami
and Okutani, 1991); from 41 m
(Egorova, 1982) to 860 m (Dell, 1990).
Marseniopsis mollis (Smith, 1902)
Lamellaria mollis Smith, 1902: 205, pl. 24, figs. 19-21; Hedley, 1911: 7.
Marseniopsis mollis: Thiele, 1912: 200; Smith, 1915: 66; Hedley, 1916: 53; Eales, 1923: 25; Arnaud,
1972: 126, fig. 17 (radula); Egorova, 1982: 28, figs. 40 (radula), 128-131; Dell, 1990: 164; Hain,
1990: 53, pl. 4, figs. 3a-c, pl. 22, figs. 1-2; Numanami and Okutani, 1991: 56, figs. 6A-D, 9B
(radula), pl. 1, figs. 3-5; Numanami, 1996: 96, figs. 63A-D, 66B (radula); Numanami et al., 1996:
212 (table, text), pl. 2, figs. 9-11.
Material studied: 4 spm. (44.5 x 33.0 - 47.7 x 38.9 mm), PI5; 5 spm. (41.2 x 33.4 - 59.9 x 48.4 mm), PI8.
Remarks: This species differs from M. 1991, in having a more regular elliptic
syowaensis Numanami and Okutani, shape and homogeneous mantle.
63
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Shetland Islands (Griffiths
et al., 2003) and Western Antarctic
Península (Dell, 1990), Peter I Island
(new record), Ross Sea (Hedley, 1911;
Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990), Cape Adare
(Smith, 1902), 163° E (Smith, 1915),
Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916), Terre
Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Shackleton Ice
Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea
(Egorova, 1982), Syowa (Numanami
and Okutani, 1991; Numanami 1996;
Numanami et al., 1996) and 24° E
(Numanami and Okutani, 1991;
Numanami, 1996); from 1 m (Hain,
1990) to 800 m (Powell, 1960).
Marseniopsis syozvaensis Numanami and Okutani, 1991
Marseniopsis syowaensis Numanami and Okutani, 1991: 58, figs. 7A-F, 9C (radula), pl. 1, figs. 1-2;
Numanami, 1996: 99, figs. 65A-F, 66C (radula).
Material studied: 3 spm. (50.1 x 45.1 - 50.1 x 45.1 mm), PI5.
Remarks: The same differences as the
similar species M. mollis (Smith, 1902)
are indicated above and were estab-
lished by Numanami and Okutani
(1991).
Distribution: Only known from
Syowa (Numanami and Okutani, 1991;
Numanami, 1996) and Peter I Island
(new record); from 5 m (Numanami,
1996) to 126 m (new record).
Family Naticidae Forbes, 1838
Genus Falsilunatia Powell, 1951
Falsilunatia delicatula (Smith, 1902) (Fig. 29)
Natica delicatula Smith, 1902: 206, pl. 24, fig. 6; 1907a: 5; Thiele, 1912: 199, pl. 12, figs. 16-17.
Falsilunatia delicatula: Dell, 1990: 148, figs. 237, 256-257, 269 (radula); Troncoso et al. 2001: 95, figs.
15, 46 (radula).
Material studied: 1 spm. (5.5 x 6.0 mm), MB4; 1 spm. (10.0 x 11.0 mm), PI5; 4 spm. (4.0 x 4.2 - 5.2 x
5.5 mm), PI8.
Remarks: The diameter (D) of the shell
is greater than its height (H), the holotype
having a D/H ratio of 1.03. On the other
hand, similar species such as F. soluta
(Gould, 1848), F.fartilis (Watson, 1881), F.
notocardensis Dell, 1990, F. eltanini Dell,
1990 and F. xantha (Watson, 1881), differ
in other features, such as thicker and / or
higher shells. This species was consid-
ered a júnior synonym of Amauropsis
grísea (Martens, 1878) by Cernohorsky
(1977), but Dell (1990) concluded that F.
delicatula is a distinct species based on
examination of several samples.
Distribution: Cited for the Weddell
Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003); South Shet-
land Islands (Dell, 1990), Peter I Island
and off Thurston Island (new records),
Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a; Dell, 1990),
Cape Adare (Smith, 1902), Balleny
Islands (Dell, 1990), Davis Sea (Thiele,
1912) and Kerguelen Islands (Troncoso
et al., 2001); from 40 m (Troncoso et
al., 2001) to 1890 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Pseudamauropsis Egorova, 2007
Pseudamauropsis anderssoni (Strebel, 1906) (Fig. 30)
Natica anderssoni Strebel, 1906: 142, pl. 11, figs. 67a-b; 1908: 61, pl. 5, figs. 64a-b.
64
ALDEA and TroncOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Amauropsis anderssoni : Powell, 1951: 116, pl. 10, figs. 58-59, J44 (radula); Castellanos and Landoni,
1990: 19, pl. 3, fig. 34; Dell, 1990: 140, figs. 245, 265 (radula); Branch et al., , 1991: 57 (key); Pas-
torino, 2005: 252, figs. 102-113; Zelaya, 2005: 120, fig. 26.
Pseudamauropsis anderssoni: Egorova, 2007: figs. 2d, 6v (radula), 7-1 (map), table 1.
Amauropsis powelli Dell, 1990: 144, figs. 246, 268 (radula); Zelaya, 2005: 120.
Pseudamauropsis powelli : Egorova, 2007: figs. 2e, 7-6 (map), table 1.
Material studied: 2 sh. (8.6 x 8.6 - 8.8 x 8.5 mm), PI6; 1 spm. (9.0 x 8.2 mm), PI7; 2 sh. and 1 spm.
(8.0 x 8.0 - 8.2 x 8.0 mm), PA25.
Remarks: The deep and narrow open
umbilicus, partially occluded by the
parietal callus, marks the difference
with the other species of the genus.
Dell (1990) described A. powelli based
on the open umbilicus, but Pastorino
(2005) presented a pattern of variation
in samples from the same geographic
locations as DelTs specimens, conclud-
ing that A. powelli is a júnior synonym of
P. anderssoni. Egorova (2007) described
the genus Pseudamauropsis based on
morphometric analyses and compar-
isons of the morphospecies Natica
prasina Watson, 1881, N. suturalis
Watson, 1881, N. anderssoni Strebel, 1908,
N. aureolutea Strebel, 1908, N. georgiana
Strebel, 1908, N. subpallescens Strebel,
1908, N. godfroyi Lamy, 1910, Lunatia?
bransfieldensis Preston, 1916, Amauropsis?
rossiana Smith, 1907 and A. powelli Dell,
1990 with the northern hemisphere
species Amauropsis islándica (Gmelin,
1791), situating the species under this
new genus and removing it from the
genus Amauropsis Morch, 1857.
However, her study did not consider the
previous revisión of the group (Pas-
torino, 2005).
Distribution : South Georgia Island
(Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951; Dell,
1990; Zelaya, 2005), Falkland /Malvinas
Islands (Strebel, 1906; Strebel, 1908;
Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Penín-
sula and Peter I Island (new records),
and Marión and Prince Edward Islands
(Branch et al., 1991); from 12 m
(Strebel, 1908) to 578 m (Dell, 1990).
Pseudamauropsis aureolutea (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 31)
Natica aureolutea Strebel, 1908: 63, pl. 5, figs. 63a-b.
Amauropsis aureolutea: Powell, 1951: 116, fig. J42 (radula); Dell, 1990: 142, figs. 251, 266 (radula);
Pastorino, 2005: 253, figs. 114-123; Zelaya, 2005: 120, fig. 27.
Pseudamauropsis aureolutea: Egorova, 2007: figs. 2v, 3a-v, 5g (operculum), 6a (radula), 7-2 (map),
table 1.
Natica subpallescens Strebel, 1908: 62, pl. 5, fig. 67.
Pseudamauropsis subpallescens: Egorova, 2007: fig. 7-10 (map), table 1.
Natica georgiana Strebel, 1908: 62, pl. 5, fig. 65a-b.
Amauropsis georgianus: Powell, 1951: 117; Castellanos and Landoni, 1990: 20, pl. 3, fig. 29g;
Numanami, 1996: 109, figs. 70A-B, C (radula); Zelaya, 2005: 120.
Pseudamauropsis georgianus: Egorova, 2007: figs. 5e (operculum), 7-4 (map), table 1.
Natica godfroyi Lamy, 1910a: 322; 1911a: 12, pl. 1, figs. 10-11.
Pseudamauropsis godfroyi: Egorova, 2007: fig. 7-5 (map), table 1.
Lunatia bransfieldensis Preston, 1916: 270, fig. 2.
Pseudamauropsis bransfieldensis: Egorova, 2007: fig. 7-3 (map), table 1.
? Natica xantha Watson: Lamy, 1911b: 23, fig. 1 (no Watson, 1881).
Amauropsis rossiana Smith: Hain, 1990: 49, pl. 3, figs. 3a-b, pl. 20, fig. 8 (radula), pl. 21, fig. 1
(radula) (no Smith, 1907).
Material studied: 3 spm. (15.0 x 14.6 - 18.0 x 16.9 mm), PI8; 1 sh. (13.1 x 12.1 mm), MB11; 1 spm.
(11.1 x 10.1 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (8.5 x 8.0 mm), MB37; 1 spm. (13.5 x 13.0 mm), MB38; 1 spm. (13.0
x 11.4 mm), PA39; 11 spm. (8.2 x 8.0 - 24.1 x 22.1 mm), LOW.
65
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Remarks: The similar A. rossiana Smith,
1907 differs in having a higher spire and
a spiral rib on the penultimate whorl. Pas-
torino (2005) considered Strebel' s (1908)
species Natica subpallescens and N. geor-
giana as júnior synonyms, because all
species, including N. aureolutea, were
described from juvenile specimens with
few significant differences; also he sus-
pected that the little-known N. godfroyi
Lamy, 1910 and Lunatia? bransfieldensis
Preston, 1916 might be júnior synonyms
as well, and reported the misidentifica-
tion of some specimens as Falsilunatia
xantha (Watson, 1881) and as A. rossiana
Smith, 1907 (see Pastorino, 2005).
Distribution : Widespread West dis-
tribution in the South Sandwich
(Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990), South
Georgia (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990; Pastorino, 2005; Zelaya,
2005) and South Orkney Islands (Dell,
1990), Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990) and
Eastern Antarctic Peninsula (Strebel,
1908), South Shetland Islands (Lamy,
1911a; Preston, 1916; Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990; this study). Western
Antarctic Peninsula, Bellingshausen Sea
and Peter I Island (new records), and
34° E and 24° E (Numanami, 1996);
from 6 m (Strebel, 1908) to 1324 m
(new record).
Family Epitoniidae Berry, 1910
Genus Acirsa Mórch, 1857
Acirsa antárctica (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 32)
Scala antárctica Smith, 1907a: 8, pl. 1, figs. 10-10b.
Epitonium antarcticum: Smith, 1915: 64.
Acirsa antárctica: Powell, 1951: 115; 1957: 131; 1958: 187; Dell, 1990: 123, fig. 203.
Material studied: 1 spm. (8.6 x 3.3 mm), MB32.
Remarks : Its generic placement is un-
certain, because it has been cited as
Acirsa, but Neville (1997) located it in the
genus Opalia H. and A. Adams, 1853.
Comparisons with other epitoniids reveal
that it differs from the similar species A.
annectens Powell, 1951 in having a strong
sculpture but a weaker basal rib.
Distribution : Bellingshausen Sea
(new record), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a;
Smith, 1915; Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990),
Kerguelen Islands (Powell, 1957),
Crozet Islands (Griffiths et al., 2003)
and Enderby Land (Powell, 1958);
from 8 m (Dell, 1990) to 1847 m (new
record).
Family Eulimidae Troschel, 1853
Genus Hemiaclis Sars, 1878
Hemiaclis incolorata (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 33)
Alaba incolorata Thiele, 1912: 201; pl. 12, fig. 19; Egorova, 1982: 31, fig. 145.
Hemiaclis incolorata: Dell, 1990: 128, figs. 213-216; Numanami, 1996: 129, fig. 80F; Engl, 2004a: 11,
fig. 1.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.1 x 1.9 mm), PA39.
Remarks : Comparisons revealed that
this species has no related ones in the
Southern Ocean, as shown in the well
developed discussion by Engl (2004a).
Distribution : Weddell Sea and South
Sandwich Islands (Engl, 2004a), South
Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990), Western
Antarctic Peninsula (new record), Ross Sea
óó
ALDEA and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
(Dell, 1990), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; 2003) and 24° E (Numanami, 1996); from
Egorova, 1982), ca. 40° E (Griffiths et al., 157 m (new record) to 1437 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Melanella Bowdich, 1822
Melanella antárctica (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 34)
Eulima antárctica Strebel, 1908: 65, pl. 6, figs. 91a-c; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 353; Thiele, 1912: pl.
12, fig. 30.
Balcis antárctica: Powell, 1951: 113; Castellanos, 1990: 27, pl. 3, fig. 27; Hain, 1990: 45, pl. 2, figs. 9a-b.
Melanella antárctica: Engl, 2004a: 12, fig. 3.
Material studied: 4 spm. (3.9 x 1.3 - 4.1 x 1.6 mm), PI8; 1 spm. (broken), MB13; 1 spm. (3.5 x 1.7
mm), PA22; 7 spm. (1.6 x 0.7 - 3.6 x 1.1 mm), MB38.
Remarks : Engl (2004a) studied
Antarctic Melanella species, not conclud-
ing on the affinity between this species
and the similar species M. subantarctica
(Strebel, 1908) from South Georgia
Island, that possesses a higher spire
similar to M. convexa (Smith, 1907).
Other Antarctic species such as M. soli-
taria (Smith, 1915) and M. exulata (Smith,
1915) differ in having the columellar
axis arched; M. boscheineni Engl, 2004,
M. sankurieae Engl, 2004 and M. tumidula
(Thiele, 1912) differ in having a higher
and narrow spire with more whorls; and
M. guenteri Engl, 2004 is a conic and
shiny species with fíat whorls.
Distribution : South Sandwich Islands
(Powell, 1951), Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), Eastern Antarctic Peninsula
(Strebel, 1908), South Shetland Islands
(Engl, 2004a), Burdwood Bank
(Melvill and Standen, 1912), Western
Antarctic Peninsula, Bellingshausen Sea
and Peter I Island (new records); from
90 m (new record) to 5194 m (Engl,
2004a).
Family Cerithiopsidae H. and A. Adams, 1854
Genus Cerithiopsilla Thiele, 1912
Cerithiopsilla antárctica (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 35)
Lovenella antárctica Smith, 1907a: 10, pl. 2, fig. 6-6a; Hedley, 1911: 5.
Cerithiopsilla antárctica: Thiele, 1912: 205, pl. 12, fig. 28; Smith, 1915: 70; Hedley, 1916: 49; Powell,
1958: 186; Egorova, 1982: 33, figs. 151-152.
Material studied: 1 spm. (6.0 x 2.1 mm), PA22.
Remarks: Several species of this
genus and of some related ones (e.g..
Cerithiella Verrill, 1882) described from
the Southern Ocean, reveal the limita-
tions of any taxonomic revisión.
Cerithiopsilla bisculpta (Strebel, 1908), C.
charcoti (Lamy, 1906) and C. cincta
Thiele, 1912 are the most similar species
to C. antárctica, and they share a
common pattern of sculpture with 3-4
spiral cords crossed by axial striae,
therefore an examination and compari-
son of type specimens will reveal the
taxonomic status of these species.
Cerithiopsilla gaussiana Egorova, 1972
lacks axial sculpture; C. austrina
(Hedley, 1911), C. liouvillei (Lamy, 1910)
and C. georgiana (Pfeffer, 1886) differ in
having only two spiral cords; and C.
burdwoodiana (Melvill and Standen,
1912) is distinguished by its granulóse
surface. Strebel (1908) and Thiele (1912)
have situated a considerable number of
species in the genus Cerithiella, which
67
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
differs in having a smooth, stout and
bulging protoconch of about two
whorls.
Distribution: Western Antarctic
Península (new record), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1907a; Hedley, 1911; Smith,
1915), Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982)
and Enderby Land (Powell, 1958); from
45 to 500 m (Egorova, 1982).
Cerithiopsilla austrina (Hedley, 1911) (Fig. 36)
Lovenella austrina Hedley, 1911: 5, pl. 1, fig. 7.
Cerithiopsilla austrina: Thiele, 1912: 205, pl. 12, fig. 29; Powell, 1958: 186; Arnaud, 1972: 122;
Egorova, 1982: 34, fig. 153.
Material studied: 2 spm. (6.1 x 2.2 - 6.6 x 2.1 mm), MAR.
Remarks : It is very similar to
Cerithiella erecta Thiele, 1912, but the
species of that genus have a smooth and
bulbose protoconch.
Distribution : Weddell Sea ca. 10° W
(Griffiths et al., 2003), Western Antarc-
tic Península (new record), Ross Sea
(Hedley, 1911; Arnaud, 1972) to Terre
Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Davis Sea (Thiele,
1912; Egorova, 1982) and Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958); from 0 m (Arnaud, 1972)
to 385 m (Egorova, 1982).
Family Muricidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Trophon Montfort, 1810
Trophon coulmanensis coulmanensis Smith, 1907 (Fig. 37)
Trophon coulmanensis Smith, 1907a: 3, pl. 1, figs. 4-4b; Thiele, 1912: 212; Smith, 1915: 73, pl. 1, fig.
14; Hedley, 1916: 61, pl. 9, fig. 99; Cernohorsky, 1977: 115, fig. 14; Egorova, 1982: 38, fig. 168;
Dell, 1990: 201, figs. 356-359.
Material studied: 1 spm. (17.8 x 12.0 mm), PA22.
Remarks: The higher spire and a little
expanded external lip, giving a pyri-
form aperture and less globose form,
mark the difference with T. shackletoni
paucilamellatus Powell, 1951. Numanami
(1996) described the subspecies T. coul-
manensis multilamellatus from East
Antárctica, based on the different
(Right page) Figure 17. Leptocollonia innocens , 6.0 x 6.3 mm, MB37. Figure 18. Dickdellia
labioflecta, 2.9 x 3.4 mm, PA22. Figure 19. Eatoniella glacialis, 2.8 x 1.9 mm, PA21. Figure
20. Eatoniella kerguelenensis regularis , 3.3 x 2.0 mm, PA20. Figure 21. Eatoniella cf. kerguele-
nensis kerguelenensis , 2.8 x 1.5 mm, PA39. Figure 22. Onoba gélida, 2.2 x 1.6 mm, PI8. Figure
23. Onoba kergueleni , 3.0 x 1.4 mm, PI8. Figure 24. Onoba turqueti , 2.1 x 1.1 mm, Pl 5 .
Figure 25. Powellisetia deserta , 2.5 x 1.5 mm, PA41. Figure 26. Torellia insignis , 16.9 x 21.0
mm, LOW. Figure 27. Torellia mirabilis , 22.0 x 30.0 mm, PA39. Figure 28. Torellia planispira ,
4.0 x 5.8 mm, PA24. Figure 29. Falsilunatia delicatula , 4.6 x 4.7 mm, PI8. Figure 30.
Pseudamauropsis anderssoni , 8.6 x 8.6 mm, PI6. Figure 31. Pseudamauropsis aureolutea , 15.9rx
14.0 mm, PI8. Figure 32. Acirsa antárctica , 8.6 x 3.3 mm, MB32. Figure 33. Hemiaclis incol-
orata , 4.1 x 1.9 mm, PA39. Figure 34. Melanella antárctica , 3.9 x 1.3 mm, PI8. Figure 35.
Cerithiopsilla antárctica , 6.0 x 2.1 mm, PA22. Figure 36. Cerithiopsilla austrina , 6.1 x 2.2 mm,
MAR.
(Página derecha) Figuras 17-36. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
68
ALDEA AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
69
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
number of lamellae, and he commented
that the species T. coulmanensis ( s.s .)
"having no expansión in basal varices";
therefore the BENTART samples, that
do not have expansión, correspond to
subspecies T. coulmanensis coulmanensis.
Although our individual is not as elon-
gate as the holotype, which has a D / H
ratio of 0.54, Hedley (1916) reported a
specimen with a ratio of 0.67, the same
as our specimen, indicating variability
in D/H ratio.
Distribution : South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Penin-
sula (new record), Ross Sea (Smith,
1907a; Dell, 1990), 163° E (Smith, 1915),
Terre Adélie (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Dell, 1990) and Kergue-
len Islands (Dell, 1990); from 183 m
(Smith, 1907a) to 1674 m (Dell, 1990).
Trophon cuspidarioides Powell, 1951 (Fig. 38)
Trophon cuspidarioides Powell, 1951: 155, pl. 9, figs. 50, M89; Castellanos and Landoni, 1993a: 7, pl.
2, fig. 25; Pastorino, 2002: 359 (text), figs. 35-37, 43b, tab. 1; Zelaya, 2005: 122.
Material studied: 3 spm. (15.0 x 6.5 - 18.3 x 7.4 mm), PI7.
Remarks : Its resemblance to some
Antarctic species with a long siphon was
discussed by Pastorino (2002), in this
sense T. scolopax Watson, 1882 presents a
longer and straighter siphon, T. septus
Watson, 1882 presents more conspicuous
lamellae and T. arnaudi Pastorino, 2002,
though similar by its curved siphon, dif-
fers in having a reticulated surface with
spiral and axial lamellae. Moreover,
some specimens of T. drygalskii Thiele,
1912 (see below) with a long siphon,
may resemble it, but the sculpture and a
more angulose shape make that species
different. Sub-Antarctic species with
similar shape were compared by
Houart and Sellanes (2006), where T.
veronicae Pastorino, 1999 and T. condei
Houart, 2003, described from larger
specimens, have a higher spire, and T.
vangoethemi Houart, 2003 can have
abapical lamellae on shoulders.
Distribution: Only reported from
South Georgia Island between 120 and
204 m (Powell, 1951) and Peter I Island
at 410 m (new records).
a-
Trophon drygalskii Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 39)
Trophon drygalskii Thiele, 1912: 213, pl. 13, fig. 25; Smith, 1915: 73; Powell, 1958: 197; Egorova,
1982: 38, fig. 165; Dell, 1990: 203, figs. 354-355; Hain, 1990: 62, pl. 6, fig. 8, pl. 25, fig. 1;
Numanami, 1996: 131, figs. 85A-C, D (radula).
Material studied: 3 spm. (3.2 x 1.6 - 11.9 x 5.2 mm), MB30; 2 spm. (7.0 x 3.1 - 12.1 x 5.0 mm), MB31.
Remarks: Spiral ridges give the whorls
a shape which is not globose, but with an
angular shoulder, separating this species
from others with a long siphon.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Shetland Island and
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990), Bellingshausen Sea (new record),
Ross Sea (Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912), Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958), ca. 40° E (Griffiths et
al., 2003) and 24° E (Numanami, 1996);
from 193 m (Powell, 1958) to 1814 m
(new record).
Trophon echinolamellatus Powell, 1951 (Fig. 40)
Trophon echinolamellatus Powell, 1951: 152, pl. 9, figs. 44-45, L83 (radula).
70
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Material studied: 1 spm. (65.1 x 37.2 mm), LOW.
Remarks: The fusiform shape with
the anterior aperture expanded and a
sculpture with flat-spiral cords crossed
by dense axial lamellae, sinuate exactly
above the Crossing with the spiral cord
"produced into hollow recurved
spines" (Powell, 1951), give a partic-
ular surface and shape which are
distinct from other species with fine
lamellae such as T. geversianus (Pallas,
1774), from the Southern end of South
America.
Distribution: Only reported in the
South Shetland Islands (Powell, 1951;
this study); from 115 m (new record) to
342 m (Powell, 1951).
Trophon longstaffi Smith, 1907 (Fig. 41)
Trophon longstaffi Smith, 1907a: 3, pl. 1, figs. 3-3d; Hedley, 1911: 8; Smith, 1915: 73; Hedley 1916:
61; Eales, 1923: 31, figs. 31-33; Arnaud, 1972: 131; Cernohorsky, 1977: 116, fig. 16; Dell, 1990:
205, figs. 351-352; Numanami, 1996: 134, figs. 87A-C, D (radula).
Material studied: 2 spm. (9.0 x 6.4 - 13.3 x 9.0 mm), PI5; 2 spm. (18.1 x 11.0 - 21.0 x 13.0 mm), PI8.
Remarks : Axial lamellae are shorter,
thinner and more fragüe than in T.
shackletoni shackletoni Hedley, 1911,
which is similar in shape, but with more
conspicuous lamellae, prolonged on
shoulders.
Distribution: Cited for the Weddell
Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003), Eastern
Antarctic Península (Smith, 1907a),
Peter I Island (new record), Ross Sea
(Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990),
Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916), Terre
Adélie (Hedley, 1916; Arnaud, 1972)
and 40° E (Numanami, 1996); from 5 m
(Arnaud, 1972; Numanami, 1996) to
1080 m (Dell, 1990).
Trophon minutus Strebel, MS. Melvill and Standen, 1907 (Fig. 42)
Trophon minutus Strebel, MS. Melvill and Standen, 1907: 137, figs. 7-7a; Strebel, 1908: 44, pl. 4, figs.
47a-b; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 354; Powell, 1951: 155; Oliver and Picken, 1984: 113, figs. 33a-
b; Dell, 1990: 203, fig. 353; Castellanos and Landoni, 1993a: 13, pl. 4, fig. 48; Zelaya, 2005: 122.
Trophon condensatus Hedley, 1916: 60, pl. 9, fig. 98; Arnaud, 1972: 131, fig. 21.
Material studied: 1 sh. (4.5 x 3.0 mm), PA20.
Remarks: Assuming the synonymy of
T. condensatus Hedley, 1916 proposed by
Dell (1990), the number of axial lamel-
lae is widely variable, as same as other
species of the genus.
Distribution: Cited for the Weddell Sea
(Griffiths et al., 2003), South Sandwich
(Dell, 1990), South Georgia (Strebel,
1908), South Orkney (Melvill and
Standen, 1907), Signy (Oliver and
Picken, 1984) and South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Península
(Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990; this study),
Ross Sea (Dell, 1990), Commonwealth
(Hedley, 1916), Terre Adélie (Arnaud,
1972) and Kerguelen Islands (Cantera
and Arnaud, 1985); from 2 m (Oliver
and Picken, 1984) to 265 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Buccinidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Antarctodomus Dell, 1972
Antarctodomus thielei (Powell, 1958) (Fig. 43)
71
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Bathydomus thielei Powell, 1958: 194, pl. 3, fig 8; Arnaud, 1972: 129, fig. 20.
Antarctodomus thielei : Dell, 1990: 168; Hain, 1990:
1996: 147, figs. 96A-C, D (radula).
Material studied: 2 spm. (29.2 x 18.5 - 36.1 x 22.0
Remarles : This species is variable in
shape (Dell, 1990), and specimens
collected over several expeditions
presented a wide variation in diam-
eter/height ratio (D/H): 0.56 in holo-
type, 0.60 in a specimen from Dell
(1990), 0.59 in Hain's (1990) specimen
and 0.64 in Numanami's (1996) spec-
imen. Antarctodomus okutanii Numa-
nami, 1996, variable in D/H ratio as
57, pl. 5, fig. 7, pl. 23, fig. 4 (radula); Numanami,
mm), LOW.
well, was described based on radular
characteristics.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Shetland Islands (new record), Ross
Sea (Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Arnaud,
1972), Mac Robertson Land (Dell, 1990),
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), cited ca. 40°
E (Griffiths et al., 2003) and 24° E
(Numanami, 1996); from 100 m (Dell,
1990) to 695 m (Hain, 1990).
Genus Chlanidota Martens, 1878
Chlanidota signeyana Powell, 1951 (Fig. 44)
Chlanidota signeyana Powell, 1951: 141, pl. 8, figs. 34-35, L74 (radula), N129 (operculum); Dell,
1990: 177, fig. 307; Harasewych and Kantor, 1999: 267, figs. 9-11, table 5.
Cominella vestita var. elongata Lamy, 1910a: 318; 1911a: 6, pl. 1, fig. 6.
Chlanidota elongata: Powell, 1951: 140, fig. L76 (radula); Cernohorsky, 1977: 110; Hain, 1990: 55, pl.
5, fig. 4, pl. 23, fig. 1 (radula); Numanami, 1996: 160, figs. 106A- F, G-H (radula); Numanami et
al. , 1996: 211-212 (tables), 213 (text), pl. 2, figs. 3-4.
Chlanidota lamyi Dell, 1990: 182, fig. 310 ( nom . nov. for Cominella vestita var. elongata Lamy, 1910,
not Cominella elongata Dunker, 1857).
Chlanidota cf. lamyi : Dell, 1990 182, fig. 315.
Chlanidota pyriformis Dell, 1990: 182, fig. 309.
Material studied: 8 spm. (8.4 x 5.6 - 34.2 x 21.2 mm), PI5; 5 spm. (23.1 x 16.0 - 28.2 x 18.0 mm), PI6;
2 spm. (12.0 x 9.0 - 26.2 x 16.1 mm), PI7; 1 spm. (19.4 x 11.3 mm), MB13; 4 spm. (22.3 x 12.9 - 32.9 x
20.2 mm), PA24; 2 spm. (27.5 x 17.1 - 29.0 x 17.8 mm), PA25; 24 spm. (14.4 x 9.6 - 25.0 x 15.3 mm),
MB34; 1 spm. (20.7 x 11.8 mm), PA39; 1 spm. (19.0 x 13.2 mm), PA40; 5 spm. (12.5 x 9.0 - 22.0 x 14.2
mm), LOW.
Remarles: Harasewych and Kantor
(1999) ha ve revised the genus and syn-
onymized many species; also they
comment that in examination of individ-
uáis, some are strongly sculptured with
pilóse projections on the spiral cords,
but these specimens differ from C. pilosa
Powell, 1951 in not having a densely
pilóse periostracum. This is a variable
species in shape, there are some very
thin individuáis with a thin columellar
callus, and others which are very thick
with a well developed columellar callus,
resembling therefore C. invenusta
Harasewych and Kantor, 1999, which
differs in having a larger operculum.
Distribution: Cited ca. the South
Sandwich Islands (Griffiths et al.,
2003); South Georgia Island (Dell, 1990),
Weddell Sea (Dell, 1990; Hain, 1990),
South Orkney (Powell, 1951; Dell,
1990), Signy (Dell, 1990) and South
Shetland Islands (Lamy, 1911a; Powell,
1951; Dell, 1990; this study). Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Dell, 1990; this
study), Bellingshausen Sea and Peter I
Island (new records), Ross Sea (Dell,
1990), Enderby Land and Syowá (Nu-
MANAMI ET AL., 1996), 24° E (NUMANAMI,
1996) and Queen Maud (Harasewych
and Kantor, 1999); from 10 m (Hain,
1990) to 1116 m (Dell, 1990).
72
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Genus Lusitromina Harasewych and Kantor, 2004
Lusitromina abyssorum (Lus, 1993) (Fig. 45)
Tromina abyssorum Lus, 1993: 178.
Lusitromina abyssorum: Harasewych and Kantor, 2004: 26, figs. 99-137, table 5.
Material studied: 1 spm. (9.0 x 6.1 mm), MB26.
Remarks : Harasewych and Kantor
(2004) have revised the genus and they
also placed L. abyssicola (Clarke, 1961)
(described as T. bella abyssicola ) from the
South Atlantic Ocean in this genus. L.
abyssicola differs in having a more
rounded shape with more convex
whorls without the characteristic shoul-
der of L. abyssorum.
Distribution : Known only from the
South Sandwich and South Georgia
Islands (Harasewych and Kantor,
2004), South Orkney (Lus, 1993), South-
east of Tierra del Fuego Island (56° S, 62°
W) (Harasewych and Kantor, 2004)
and Bellingshausen Sea (new record);
from 1920 m (new record) to 5480 m
(Harasewych and Kantor, 2004).
Genus Neobuccinum Smith, 1879
Neobuccinum eatoni (Smith, 1875) (Fig. 46)
Buccinopsis eatoni Smith, 1875: 68.
Neobuccinum eatoni: Smith, 1879: 169, pl. 9, fig. 1; Watson, 1886: 216; Smith, 1902: 202; Lamy,
1906b: 2; Smith, 1907a: 1; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 139; Hedley, 1911: 6, pl. 1, figs. 11, 12
(eggs); Lamy, 1911a: 5; Thiele, 1912: 248; Smith, 1915: 72; Hedley, 1916: 59, pl. 9, fig. 97; Eales,
1923: 28; Powell, 1951: 143; Powell, 1957: 132; 1958: 193; Arnaud, 1972: 128; Egorova, 1982: 41,
figs. 51 (radula), 172-176; Dell, 1990: 165, figs. 280-282; Hain 1990: 56, pl. 5, figs. 6a-e, pl. 23, fig.
3 (radula); Numanami, 1996: 143, figs. 94A-B, D-G, C (radula); Numanami et al., 1996: 211-212
(tables), 214 (text), pl. 2, fig. 2; Troncoso et al., 2001: 97, fig. 19.
Neobuccinum eytoni (sic): Thiele, 1912: 211.
Neobuccinum praeclarum Strebel, 1908: 31, pl. 3, figs. 38a-g.
Chlanidota smithi Powell, 1958: 192, pl. 3, fig. 3; Harasewych and Kantor, 1999: 291: fig. 27.
Material studied: 2 spm. (28.0 x 15.0 - 40.0 x 25.0 mm), MB1; 6 spm. (35.0 x 20.0 - 53.0 x 30.0 mm),
PI5; 2 spm. (48.0 x 29.1 - 51.5 x 32.5 mm), PIÓ; 51 spm. (31.3 x 20.0 - 55,9 x 33.9 mm), PI8; 1 spm.
(31.8 x 22.1 mm), MB13; 20 spm. (36.0 x 21.5 - 54.2 x 27.7 mm), PA22; 7 spm. (34.8 x 22.0 - 49.1 x
29.8 mm), PA23.
Remarks: Although it is variable in
shape, this is a well known species.
Hedley (1916) maintained that N.
preclarum Strebel, 1908 is a júnior
synonym, because it was described
based on the variability of some speci-
mens that may have spiral Unes. Fur-
thermore, Harasewych and Kantor
(1999) considered Chlanidota smithi
Powell, 1958 as another júnior synonym.
Distribution: Widespread Antarctic
and Sub-Antarctic distribution, but not
cited for the South Georgia Island ñor
the Magellanic zone. Reported in the
South Sandwich (Powell, 1951; Dell,
1990), South Orkney (Melvill and
Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990) and Signy
Islands (Dell, 1990), Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990) and Eastern Antarctic Peninsula
(Strebel, 1908), South Shetland Islands
(Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990) and Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy, 1906b, 1911a;
Dell, 1990; this study), Bellingshausen
Sea (Lamy, 1911a; this study) and Peter I
Island (Dell, 1990; this study), off
Thurston Island (new record), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1915; Eales, 1923; Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990), Cape Adare (Smith, 1902),
73
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Balleny Islands (Dell, 1990), Common-
wealth (Hedley, 1916), Terre Adélie
(Arnaud, 1972), Shackleton Ice Shelf
(Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), Heard (Watson, 1886)
and Kerguelen Islands (Smith, 1879;
Watson, 1886; Powell, 1957; Troncoso
et al., 2001), Kemp Land (Powell,
1958), Enderby Land (Numanami et al.,
1996) and Syowa (Numanami, 1996;
Numanami et al., 1996); from 4 to 2350
m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Notoficula Thiele, 1917
Notoficula bouveti (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 47)
Cominella bouveti Thiele, 1912: 270, pl. 19, fig. 13.
Notoficula bouveti: Powell, 1958: 193; Oliver, 1983:
Material studied: 1 spm. (11.2 x 8.7 mm), LOW.
Remarks: Oliver (1983) discussed the
systematic position of this genus in
Antárctica, the affinities between species
and its relationship with Lamellariacea.
The species N. signyensis Oliver, 1983,
differs in having a more globose last
whorl, with a broader aperture and a
shorter spire.
(in part), figs. ld-e; Dell, 1990: 168, fig. 287.
Distribution: Cited ca. 10° W (Grif-
FITHS et al., 2003); South Shetland
Islands (new record), Ross Sea (Dell,
1990), from the Amery Ice Shelf to the
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), and
Bouvet Island (Thiele, 1912; Linse,
2006); from 86 m (new record) to 540 m
(Powell, 1958).
Genus Pareuthria Strebel, 1905
Pareuthria regulus (Watson, 1882) (Fig. 48)
Fusus regulus Watson, 1882: 378; 1886: 204, pl. 12, fig. 7.
Pareuthria regulus: Powell, 1957: 132; Branch et al, 1991: 59 (key); Troncoso et al, 2001: 98, fig. 21.
Material studied: 1 spm. and 1 sh. (6.9 x 3.0 - 8.1 x 3.5 mm), PI5; 1 spm. (6.5 x 3.0 mm), PA39.
Remarks: P. turriformis Egorova, 1982,
differs in having axial ribs crossed by
spiral striae. P. innocens (Smith, 1907),
differing in having a shorter siphon,
being smoother and having a sculpture
which is stronger spirally than axially. P.
plicatula Thiele, 1912 has stronger and
denser spiral ribs and no spiral sculp-
ture. P. hoshiaii Numanami, 1996 is a
species with a poorly developed shell
sculpture. Dell (1990) remarked that the
little known P. valdiviae Thiele, 1925, has
an affinity with this species.
Distribution: East Antárctica in the
Kerguelen (Watson, 1886; Powell,
1957; Troncoso et al., 2001), Crozet
(Griffiths et al., 2003), Marión and
Prince Edward Islands (Branch et al.,
1991); West Antárctica in Western
Antarctic Peninsula and Peter I Island
(new records); from 0 to 527 m (Branch
ET AL., 1991).
Genus Probuccinum Thiele, 1912
Probuccinum tenerum (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 49)
Neobuccinum tenerum Smith, 1907a: 2, pl. 1, figs. 2-2a; Smith, 1915: 72.
74
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Probuccinum tenerum : Thiele, 1912: 211, pl. 13, figs. 21-21a, pl. 16, fig. 21 (radula); Dell, 1990: 171,
figs. 279, 283-284; Hain, 1990: 58, pl. 5, fig. 9, pl. 23, fig. 6 (radula).
Probuccinum tenuistriatum Hedley, 1916: 58, pl. 8, figs. 95-96; Powell, 1958: 194; Egorova, 1982: 42,
figs. 52 (radula), 178-179; Hain, 1990: 58, pl. 5, fig. 10, pl. 23, fig. 7 (radula); Numanami, 1996:
157, figs. 104A- G, H (radula); Numanami et al.r 1996: 212 (table, text) pl. 2, fig. 10.
Material studied: 1 spm. (17.0 x 8.2 mm), PA25.
Remarks : Probuccinum delicatulum
Powell, 1951 and P. angulatum Powell,
1951 differ in having a straighter spire
with slightly convex whorls. The syn-
onymy of P. tenuistriatum Hedley, 1916
was proposed by Dell (1990), maintain-
ing that the double labial varix and
details of sculpture, the main character-
istics of P. tenuistriatum, correspond to
the characteristic variability and
changes through development of the
species.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain 1990),
South Orkney and South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Dell, 1990; this study) and Peter I Island
(Dell, 1990), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907a, 1915;
Dell, 1990), Commonwealth (Hedley,
1916), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova,
1982; Dell, 1990), from Amery Ice Shelf to
Enderby (Powell, 1958), Syowa (Nu-
MANAMI ET AL., 1996) and 24° E (Nu-
manami, 1996); from 30 m (Numanami
et al., 1996) to 673 m (Hain, 1990).
Genus Prosipho Thiele, 1912
Prosipho chordatus (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 50)
Sipho? chordatus Strebel, 1908: 30, pl. 2, figs. 29a-c.
Prosipho chordatus: Powell, 1951: 146; Dell, 1990: 197 (text), fig. 335; Castellanos, 1992b: 18, pl. 2,
fig. 20; Zelaya, 2005: 126, fig. 43.
Material studied: 1 spm. (8.0 x 3.9 mm), PI8.
Remarks : The species P. spiralis
Thiele, 1912 is very cióse in shape and
sculpture, but it has one whorl less,
being slightly shorter and with slightly
stronger spiral chords over the entire
shell. Dell (1990) discussed the affinity
between P. spiralis and P. chordatus, con-
tending that the two species would
require critical comparison when more
material is available from closer locali-
ties. Also, it has a resemblance with P.
antarctidis (Pelseneer, 1903) cited for the
Bellingshausen Sea, but that species pre-
sents wider first whorls.
Distribution: Known only from South
Georgia Island (Strebel, 1908; Powell,
1951; Zelaya, 2005) and Peter I Island
(new record), although it was cited for the
South Atlantic Ocean (Castellanos,
1992b) and Weddell Sea (Griffiths et al.,
2003). The bathymetric distribution is from
90 m (new record) to 600 m (Castellanos,
1992b). Zelaya (2005) doubts the presence
of this species in the South Atlantic Ocean
after comparison of the original descrip-
tion with the specimens figured by
Castellanos (1992b) and the lack of these
samples in museums.
Prosipho hedleyi Powell, 1958 (Fig. 51)
Prosipho hedleyi Powell, 1958: 195, pl. 2, fig. 7; Dell, 1990: 194, fig. 327.
Material studied: 2 spm. (6.9 x 2.8 - 7.3 x 2.9 mm), PI8.
75
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Remarks: The closest species is P. tur-
ritus Oliver and Picken, 1984, that differs
mainly in having a smaller number of
spiral cords at the base (4-5 vs. 6-9 in P.
hedleyi ) and being wider in D/H ratio
which varíes: 0.42-0.53 vs. 0.36-0.40 in P.
hedleyi , according to Dell (1990).
Distribution: Cited ca. 10° W in the
Weddell Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003);
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990), Peter I Island (new record), Ross
Sea (Dell, 1990) and Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958); from 64 to 472 m (Dell,
1990).
Prosipho hunteri Hedley, 1916 (Fig. 52)
Prosipho hunteri Hedley, 1916: 56, pl. 8, fig. 92; Powell, 1951: 147; Powell, 1958: 196; Arnaud, 1972:
130; Dell, 1990: 194, fig. 322; Hain, 1990: 60, pl. 6, fig. 2, pl. 24, fig. 3 (radula); Numanami, 1996:
165, figs. 110A-B, C (radula); Engl, 2004b: 1 (text), fig. 1; Zelaya, 2005: 126.
Material studied: 2 spm. (5.3 x 2.8 - 5.8 x 3.0 mm), PA39.
Remarks : Engl (2004b) established
that P. hunteri may correspond to a varia-
tion of P. nodosus Thiele, 1912, because
both species share the characteristic of
two nodulose spiral cords on each whorl
and four in the last whorl; He also
described P. enricoi Engl, 2004, a similar
species from the South Shetland Islands,
without indicating differences with P.
hunteri, though he figured its holotype,
that is distinguished in having slightly
weaker spiral cords than P. enricoi. Sum-
marizing, we agree with Engl (2004b)
that a study comparing the material pub-
lished from several expeditions (Thiele,
1912; Hedley, 1916; Powell, 1951, 1958;
Arnaud, 1972; Dell, 1990; Hain, 1990;
Engl, 2004b; this study) is necessary to
clarify the relationship between P
hunteri, P. nodosus and P. enricoi.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich (Dell, 1990) and
South Georgia Islands (Powell, 1951),
South Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990),
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990; this study) and Ross Sea (Dell,
1990), Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916),
Terre Adélie (Arnaud, 1972), Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958), ca. 40° E (Grif-
fiths et al., 2003) and 24° E
(Numanami, 1996); from 45 m (Hain,
1990) to 464 m (Dell, 1990).
Prosipho pellitus Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 53)
Prosipho pellitus Thiele, 1912: 245, pl. 13, fig. 9; Powell, 1957: 133; Dell, 1990: 195, fig. 329; Zelaya,
2005: 126, fig. 45.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.1 x 2.0 mm), PI8.
(Right page) Figure 37. Trophon coulmanensis coulmanensis , 17.8 x 12.0 mm, PA22. Figure 38.
Trophon cuspidarioides , 15.0 x 6.5 mm, PI7. Figure 39. Trophon drygalskii, 12.1 x 5.0 mm, MB31.
Figure 40. Trophon echinolamellatus , 65.1 x 37.2 mm, LOW. Figure 41. Trophon longstaffi, 21.0 x
13.0 mm, PI8. Figure 42. Trophon minutus, 4.5 x 3.0 mm, PA20. Figure 43. Antarctodomus thielei ,
29.2 x 18.5 mm, LOW. Figure 44. Chlanidota signeyana , 34.2 x 21.2 mm, PI5. Figure 45. Lusitro-
mina abyssorum , 9.0 x 6.1 mm, MB26. Figure 46. Neobuccinum eatoni , 48.0 x 29.1 mm, PI6.
Figure 47. Notoficula bouveti , 11.2 x 8.7 mm, LOW. Figure 48. Pareuthria regulas, 8.1 x 3.5 mm,
PI5. Figure 49. Probuccinum tenerum, 17.0 x 8.2 mm, PA25. Figure 50. Prosipho chordatus , 8.0 x
3.9 mm, PI8. Figure 51. Prosipho hedleyi, 7.3 x 2.9 mm, PI8. Figure 52. Prosipho hunteri, 5.3 x 2.8
mm, PA39.
(Página derecha) Figuras 37-52. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
76
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
77
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Remarles: Its main characteristic is
the periostracum developed in conspic-
uous axial lamellae, which distinguish
it from other species similar in shape
and sculpture, but not having lamellae -
such as P. hedleyi Powell, 1958, P. turri-
tus Oliver and Picken, 1984, P. gracilis
Thiele, 1912 and P. glacialis Thiele, 1912.
Distribution: Cited ca. 10° W from
the Weddell Sea (Griffiths et al.,
2003); South Georgia (Dell, 1990;
Zelaya, 2005), Peter I (new record)
and Kerguelen Islands (Thiele,
1912; Powell, 1957); from 90 m
(new record) to 150 m (Powell,
1957).
Prosipho pusillus Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 54)
Prosipho pusillus Thiele, 1912: 208, pl. 12, fig. 35; Egorova, 1982: 46, figs. 58 (radula), 193; Dell,
1990: 196, fig. 316.
Material studied: 1 spm. (5.0 x 2.5 mm), PI8.
Remarles: P. crassicostatus (Melvill and
Standen, 1907) and P. aurora Hedley,
1916 are similar in shape, but have one
whorl more and one spiral cord more
per whorl, this being the last spiral cord
on the suture.
Distribution: Cited ca. 10° W in the
Weddell Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003);
Peter I Island (new record), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990) and Davis Sea (Thiele,
1912; Egorova, 1982); from 90 m (new
record) to 563 m (Dell, 1990).
Prosipho rever sus Powell, 1958 (Fig. 55)
Prosipho reversa Powell, 1958: 197, pl. 2, fig. 6; Dell, 1990: 196, fig. 341.
Material studied: 1 spm. (broken), PA39.
Remarles: Although we only found a
fragment of a fresh shell with remains of
soft parts, the spiral sculpture of two spiral
cords on the penultimate whorl, being the
adapical above the base, clearly differen-
ciates this species from P. perversas
Powell,1951 and P. contrarius Thiele, 1912.
Distribution: Known only from
the South Shetland Islands (Dell,
1990), Western Antarctic Penín-
sula (new record) and Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958); from 157 m
(new record) to 220 m (Powell,
1958).
Prosipho turritus Oliver and Picken, 1984 (Fig. 56)
Prosipho turrita Oliver and Picken, 1984: 99, figs. 2a-b, 6a-d; Dell, 1990: 194 (text), fig. 328; Hain,
1990: 61, pl. 6, fig. 4, pl. 24, fig. 5 (radula).
Cerithium georgianum Martens and Pfeffer: Melvill and Standen, 1907: 134 (no Martens and
Pfeffer, 1886).
Material studied: 1 spm. (5.6 x 2.4 mm), PA39.
Remarles: Oliver and Picken (1984)
examined individuáis assigned to
Cerithium georgianum Martens and
Pfeffer, 1886 by Melvill and Standen
(1907 p. 134), and concluded that those
specimens are co-specific with ' P.
turritus. The species P. harrietae Engl and
Schwabe, 2003 has a weaker sculpture
and is narrower; also when considering
the description of its radular characteris-
78
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
tics. P. hedleyi Powell is narrower as well
(see above for remarks on P. hedleyi).
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Orkney (Melvill and Standen,
1907) and Signy Islands (Oliver and
Picken, 1984), Western Antarctic Penín-
sula (new record); from 2 m (Oliver and
Picken, 1984) to 300 m (Hain, 1990).
Family Volutidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Harpovoluta Thiele, 1912
Harpovoluta charcoti (Lamy, 1910) (Fig. 57)
Buccinum charcoti Lamy, 1910a: 318; 1911a: 4, pl. 1, figs. 1-2.
Harpovoluta charcoti: Thiele, 1912: 271; Powell, 1951: 164; Powell, 1958: 199; Dell, 1990: 218, figs.
365-366, 374-375, 383 (radula); Hain, 1990: 64, pl. 6, figs. lOa-d, pl. 25, fig. 3 (radula);
Numanami, 1996: 195, figs. 134A- D, F (radula); Numanami et al., 1996: 211-212 (tables), 214
(text), pl. 2, figs. 6-7.
Volutharpa charcoti: Smith, 1915: 72; Eales, 1923: 33
Harpovoluta vanhoeffeni Thiele, 1912: 213, pl. 14, fig. 1; Hedley, 1916: 53; Egorova, 1982: 36, fig. 163.
Harpovoluta vanhoeffeni var. striatula Thiele, 1912: 214, pl. 14, fig. 2; Egorova, 1982: 37, figs. 48
(radula), 164.
Material studied: 3 spm. (broken), PA19; 1 spm. (54.8 x 32.0 mm), PA22; 3 spm. (14.0 x 9.0 - 14.3 x
9.2 mm), PA23; 6 spm. (26.3 x 16.1 - 44.1 x 22.1 mm), PA39; 1 spm. (20.0 x 13.1 mm), LOW.
Remarks: Based on the examination
of many specimens, Dell (1990) con-
cluded that the variability in shell pro-
portions is definitive to place H. vanhoef-
feni and H. vanhoeffeni var. striatula as
júnior synonyms of H. charcoti.
Distribution: South Sandwich Islands
(Dell, 1990), Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
Scotia Sea and South Orkney Islands
(Dell, 1990), South Shetland Islands
(Lamy, 1911a; Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990;
this study). Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Dell, 1990; this study), Ross Sea (Dell,
1990), 163° E (Smith, 1915), from Terre
Adélie to Wilkes Land and Shackleton Ice
Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea (Thiele,
1912; Egorova, 1982), Amery Ice-Shelf
(Numanami et al., 1996), Mac Robertson
Land (Powell, 1958), Enderby Land,
Syowa (Numanami et al., 1996) and 34° E
(Numanami, 1996); from 0 m (Numanami
et al., 1996) to 1469 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Conidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Belaturricula Powell, 1951
Belaturricula ergata (Hedley, 1916) (Fig. 58)
Pontiothauma ergata Hedley, 1916: 55, pl. 8, figs. 85-87; Powell, 1958: 204, pl. 3, figs. 7, Cl-4;
Egorova, 1982: 50, figs. 63a-b (radula), 204-205; Okutani, 1986: 279 (table), pl. 1, figs. 4-5; Dell,
1990: 245 (text), figs. 397, 418-419; Hain, 1990: 72, pl. 8, figs. 6a-d, pl. 27, fig. 2 (radula);
Numanami, 1996: 224, figs. 159 A-C, D-E (radula).
Belaturricula ergata: Kantor and Harasewych, 1999: 434 (text).
Pontiothauma elgata (sic): Numanami et al., 1996: 211 (table), 213 (text), pl.3, fig. 3.
Material studied: 1 spm. (18.0 x 7.9 mm), MB1.
Remarks: Hedley (1916) described
this species from two individuáis, one
eroded and the other broken, but his
description agrees with our specimen.
Kantor and Harasewych (1999)
studied the similar species B. gaini
(Lamy, 1910) and assigned B. ergata to
the genus Belaturricula because of its
79
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
affinity to B. gaini, which differs in
having convex whorls, different from
the concave-convex whorls of B. ergata.
On the other hand, the shape and
proportions of this species seem vari-
able, because the holotype has a D/H
ratio of 0.38 while the three specimens
figured by Hain (1990) vary in 0.37-0.51
and those by Numanami (1996) in 0.33-
0.40.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), off Thurston Island (new record),
Terre Adélie (Hedley, 1916), Wilkes
Land (Powell, 1958), Shackleton Ice
Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea
(Egorova, 1982), Mac Robertson Land
to Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), Syowa
(Numanami et al., 1996) and 24° E
(Okutani, 1986; Numanami, 1996); from
100 to 695 m (Hain, 1990).
Belaturricula gaini (Lamy, 1910) (Fig. 59)
Sipho gaini Lamy, 1910a: 319; 1911a: 7, pl. 1, figs. 7-8.
Prosipho? gaini: Thiele, 1912: 262.
?Chlanidota gaini: Powell, 1951: 142.
Chlanidota gaini: Dell, 1990: 177 (text); Harasewych and Kantor, 1999: 293.
Belaturricula gaini: Kantor and Harasewych, 1999: 430, figs. 1-4.
Belaturricula antárctica Dell, 1990: 228, figs. 401, 431 (radula).
Material studied: 1 spm. (20.0 x 8.1 mm), PA23; 2 spm. (15.3 x 6.9 - 53.9 x 19.5 mm), LOW.
Remarks : Kantor and Harasewych
(1999) redescribed this little known
species and examined its alimentary
System and radula, concluding that B.
antárctica Dell, 1990 is a júnior synonym.
Other species of this genus, B. turrita
turrita (Strebel, 1908) and B. turrita mul-
tispiralis Dell, 1990, are differentiated in
having a sharper spiral sculpture. The
relationship with B. ergata (Hedley,
1916) is discussed above (see B. ergata).
Distribution : South Sandwich Islands
(Dell, 1990), Eastern Antarctic Península
(Kantor and Harasewych, 1999),
South Orkney Islands (Dell, 1990;
Kantor and Harasewych, 1999), South
Shetland Islands (Lamy, 1911a; Dell,
1990; Kantor and Harasewych, 1999;
this study). Western Antarctic Península
(new record) and Ross Sea (Dell, 1990;
Kantor and Harasewych, 1999); from
97 m (new record) to 759 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Turridae Swainson, 1840
Genus Aforia Dalí, 1889
Aforia magnifica (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 60)
?Surcula magnifica Strebel, 1908: 19, pl. 2, figs. 23a-d.
Aforia magnifica: Powell, 1951: 167, fig. M91 (radula); Powell, 1958: 201; Dell, 1990: 231, figs. 411-
412, 436 (radula); Hain, 1990: 69, pl. 7, figs. 8a-c, pl. 26, figs. 1-2 (radula); Numanami et al.,
1996: 211 (table), 213 (text), pl. 3, figs. 1, 4.
Material studied: 1 spm. (69.0 x 26.0 mm), PA18; 1 spm. (47.9 x 17.5 mm), PA21; 2 spm. (41.8 x 17.5
- 47.0 x 16.1 mm), LOW.
Remarks: The main difference with
the similar species A. multispiralis Dell,
1990, is in the number of spiral keels
per whorl: two sharp keels on the
spire whorls in A. multispiralis instead
of the single rounded carina in A. mag-
nifica. Dell (1990) noted the variability
of the strength of sculpture between
individuáis collected at different
depths.
80
ALDEA AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Distribution : South Sandwich Islands
(Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990), Weddell Sea
(Hain, 1990) and Eastern Antarctic
Península (Strebel, 1908), South
Orkney Islands (Dell, 1990), South
Shetland Islands and Western Antarctic
Península (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990;
this study), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Amery Ice Shelf to Mac Robertson Land
(Powell, 1958), Syowa (Numanami et
al., 1996) and ca. 10° E (Griffiths et al.,
2003); from 73 to 1890 m (Dell, 1990).
Aforia multispiralis Dell, 1990 (Fig. 61)
Aforia multispiralis Dell, 1990: 231, figs. 413-414, 416, 433, 435 (radula); Numanami et al., 1996: 211
(table), 213 (text), pl. 3, figs. 2, 5.
Material studied: 1 spm. (65.1 x 25.3 mm), PA24;
Remarles: Dell (1990) noted the vari-
ability of the strength of sculpture,simi-
larly to A. magnifica (see above), con-
cluding that individuáis from greater
depths may have finer secondary
spirals.
1 spm. (87.2 x 28.5 mm), PA25.
Distribution: South Orkney and
South Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990),
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990; this study) and Amery Ice-Shelf
(Numanami et al., 1996); from 110 m
(new record) to 1455 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Conorbela Powell, 1951
Conorbela antárctica (Strebel, 1908) (Fig. 62)
Bela antárctica Strebel, 1908: 16, pl. 3, figs. 30a-b.
Conorbela antárctica: Powell, 1951: 170; Dell, 199
pl. 7, figs. 9a-b, pl. 26, figs. 3-4 (radula).
Material studied: 2 spm. (15.7 x 8.3 - 23.0 x 10.8
Distribution: South Sandwich
Islands (Powell, 1951), Weddell Sea
(Strebel, 1908; Hain, 1990), South
Georgia Island (Carcelles, 1953),
South Shetland Islands (Powell, 1951;
I: 239, figs. 395, 415, 434 (radula); Hain, 1990: 70,
a), MB34; 1 spm. (17.2 x 9.1 mm), PA39.
Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Penin-
sula, Bellingshausen Sea (new records)
and Ross Sea (Dell, 1990); from 18 m
(Carcelles, 1953) to 1437 m (Dell,
1990).
Genus Leucosyrinx Dalí, 1889
Leucosyrinx paratenoceras Powell, 1951 (Fig. 63)
Leucosyrinx paratenoceras Powell, 1951: 168, pl. 9,
fig. 21.
Material studied: 1 spm. (31.5 x 10.3 mm), MB4;
- 42.9 x 12.8 mm), MB37.
Remarles: Two similar species were
described together for Falkland /Malv-
inas Islands in the same work (Powell
1951): L. paragenota and L. falklandica; the
first can be differentiated from L.
fig. 54; Castellanos and Landoni, 1993b: 6, pl. 3,
L spm. (38.6 x 11.9 mm), MB36; 2 spm. (37.9 x 11.1
paratenoceras mainly by its D/H ratio
(0.35 in holotype of L. paragenota vs. 0.30
of L. paratenoceras ) and having axial
cords; the second is distinguished mainly
by having stronger axial sculpture.
81
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Distribution : Cited for the South
Orkney Islands (Castellanos and
Landoni, 1993b), South Shetland
Islands and Western Antarctic Penín-
sula (Powell, 1951), Bellingshausen
Sea and off Thurston Island (new
records); from 200 to 810 m (Powell,
1951).
Genus Typhlodaphne Powell, 1951
Typhlodaphne innocentia Dell, 1990 (Fig. 64)
Typhlodaphne innocentia Dell, 1990: 240, figs. 394, 406.
Material studied: 1 spm. (6.0 x 3.1 mm), PI5; 11 spm. (4.2 x 2.2 - 10.4 x 5.1 mm), PI8.
Remarles: Dell (1990) described this
species based upon individuáis of about
4 mm, but the characteristics of our
specimens agree with Dell's description.
T. nipri Numanami, 1996, from East
Antárctica is similar because its author
defined it as an allied species, but
without axial sculpture. T. corpulenta
(Watson, 1881), from Kerguelen Island,
differs in having a thicker shell.
Distribution : Cited for the Weddell Sea
(Griffiths et al., 2003); Peter I Island (new
record) and Ross Sea (Dell, 1990); from
90 m (new record) to 549 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Typhlomangelia Sars, 1878
Typhlomangelia principalis Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 65)
Typhlomangelia? principalis Thiele, 1912: 215, pl. 14, figs. 6-7; Egorova, 1982: 50, figs. 64 (radula),
209-210.
Material studied: 3 spm. and 1 sh. (9.2 x 4.1 - 17.5 x 7.9 mm), MB35; 1 spm. (19.2 x 7.0 mm), MB37;
1 sh. (16.8 x 7.9 mm), MB38.
Remarles : Although some specimens
are a little eroded, the shell characteris-
tics, such as flattened spiral cords Cross-
ing the axial ridges and marked growth
striae, allowed us to assign it to Thiele's
species, which has been little cited.
Distribution: Cited for the Weddell
Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003); Belling-
shausen Sea (new record) and Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982) from 310
m (Egorova, 1982) to 1117 m (new
record).
(Right page) Figure 53. Prosipho pellitus , 4.1 x 2.0 mm, PI8. Figure 54. Prosipho pusillus , 5.0 x 2.5
mm, PI8. Figure 55. Prosipho reversus, scale bar = 2.0 mm, PA39. Figure 56. Prosipho turritus , 5.6 x
2.4 mm, PA39. Figure 57. Harpovoluta charcoti , 54.8 x 32.0 mm, PA22. Figure 58. Belaturricula
ergata , 18.0 x 7.9 mm, MB1. Figure 59. Belaturricula gaini, 20.0 x 8.1 mm, PA23. Figure 60.
Aforia magnifica , 47.9 x 17.5 mm, PA21. Figure 61. Aforia multispiralis , 87.2 x 28.5 mm, PA25.
Figure 62. Conorbela antárctica , 23.0 x 10.8 mm, MB34. Figure 63. Leucosyrinx parateno ceras, 31.5
x 10.3 mm, MB4. Figure 64. Typhlodaphne innocentia , 6.0 x 3.1 mm, PI5. Figure 65. Typhlonyzn-
gelia principalis , 17.5 x 7.9 mm, MB35. Figure 66. Acteon antarcticus , 6.1 x 3.7 mm, MB3. Figure
67. Neactaeonina edentula, 6.7 x 3.5 mm, PI5. Figure 68. Neumesia antárctica , 18.0 x 15.0 mm,
PA39. Figure 69. Philine alata, 9.2 x 7.3 mm, DEC.
(Página derecha) Figuras 53-69. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
82
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
83
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Superorder Heterobranchia Gray, 1840
Order Opisthobranchia Milne-Edwards, 1848
Family Acteonidae d'Orbigny, 1842
Genus Acteon Montfort, 1810
Acteon antarcticus Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 66)
Actaeon antarcticus Thiele, 1912: 219, pl. 14, fig. 17.
Acteon antarcticus: Powell, 1951: 175; 1958: 205; Dell, 1990: 247, fig. 444.
Material studied: 1 spm. (6.1 x 3.7 mm), MB3.
Remarks: Several species of the
former genus Acteon were described
from Sub-Antarctic waters, although a
lot of them have been situated in other
genera in later works (e.g. Toledonia
vagabunda (Mabille, 1885)). Among valid
recent species, the Magellanic A. biplica-
tus (Strebel, 1908) and A. elongatus
Castellanos, Rolán and Bartolotta, 1987
are separated by being more elongate
forms.
Distribution : South Sandwich (Dell,
1990) and South Shetland Islands
(Powell, 1951), off Thurston Island
(new record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912) and Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958); from 101 m (Dell,
1990) to 1431 m (new record).
Genus Neactaeonina Thiele, 1912
Neactaeonina edentula (Watson, 1883) (Fig. 67)
Actaeon edentulus Watson, 1883: 284; 1886: 632, pl. 47, fig. 6.
Neactaeonina edentula: Thiele, 1912: 219; Powell, 1951: 176; Powell, 1957: 136; Dell, 1990: 248, figs.
439-440; Castellanos, Landoni and Dadon, 1993: 9, pl. 1, fig. 10.
Material studied: 6 spm. (6.3 x 3.3 - 9.0 x 5.0 mm), PI5; 1 spm. (18.0 x 9.5 mm), MB34; 1 spm. (5.3 x
3.1 mm), LOW.
Remarks : The individuáis can be dis-
tinguished from N. cingulata (Strebel,
1908) by having spiral furrows which are
shallower, irregular and and less numer-
ous. However, Dell (1990) remarked on
the uncertain relationship with N. fragilis
(Thiele, 1912), because the original
description of N. fragilis was made from
a single damaged small specimen, and
does not inelude a good description and
figure of this. The record in Powell
(1951) from South Shetland and South
Georgia Islands may correspond to N.
cingulata, according to Powell (1960).
Distribution : South Georgia (Powell,
1951), South Orkney (Carcelles, 1953)
and South Shetland Islands (Powell, 1951;
Dell, 1990; this study), Bellingshausen
Sea and Peter I Island (new records), Ross
Sea (Dell, 1990) and Kerguelen Islands
(Watson, 1886; Powell, 1957; Dell, 1990);
from 5 to 1116 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Diaphanidae Odhner, 1914
Genus Newnesia Smith, 1902
Newnesia antárctica Smith, 1902 (Fig. 68)
Newnesia antárctica Smith, 1902: 208, pl. 25, figs. 1-6; Thiele, 1912: 218; Hedley, 1916: 64; Odhner,
1926: 7, figs. 4-8; Dell, 1990: 254, fig. 482; Hain, 1990: 75, pl. 9, figs. la-i, pl. 28, fig. 1 (radula);
Zelaya, 2005: 130, fig. 64.
84
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Anderssonia sphinx Strebel, 1908: 12, pl. 2, figs. 21a-g.
Material studied: 4 spm. (7.3 x 5.8 - 18.0 x 15.0 mm), PA39.
Remarks : Odhner (1926) synonymized
this with Strebel's species N. sphinx.
Distribution : South Georgia (Zelaya,
2005) and South Orkney Islands (Car-
celles, 1953), Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990)
and Eastern Antarctic Peninsula
(Strebel, 1908), Western Antarctic Penin-
sula (new record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Cape Adare (Smith, 1902) Terre Adélie
and Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916),
and Davis Sea (Dell, 1990); from 16 m
(Carcelles, 1953) to 655 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Philinidae Gray, 1850
Genus Philine Ascanius, 1772
Philine alata Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 69)
Philine alata Thiele, 1912: 220, pl. 14, figs. 19-20; Powell, 1951: 177; Powell, 1958: 207; Vicente and
Arnaud, 1974: 534, figs. la-d; Hain, 1990: 76, pl. 9, figs. 2a-l, pl. 28, fig. 2 (radula); Castellanos et
al. , 1993: 16, pl. 2, fig. 15.
Material studied: 9 spm. (15.7 x 8.4 - 35.5 x 17.8 mm), PI5; 7 spm. (19.0 x 7.9 - 24.9 x 12.6 mm), PI6;
2 spm. (13.0 x 8.0 mm - broken), PA39; 70 spm. (4.0 x 3.0 - 12.5 x 8.6 mm), DEC.
Remarks : Some morphological differ-
ences in shell were observed between
BENTART individuáis and other
Antarctic species. The outer lip is much
higher than the spire, contrary to P.
antárctica Smith, 1902; the shape is
rhomboidal contrary to P. apertissima
Smith, 1902 which is rounded, the
spiral sculpture is lacking whereas it is
present in P. falklandica Powell, 1951
and the hump present in P. gibba
Strebel, 1908. Dell (1990) believes that
a detailed revisión of the genus is
needed.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
Scotia Sea, South Sandwich and South
Orkney Islands (Powell, 1951), South
Shetland Islands and Western Antarctic
Peninsula (Powell, 1951; this study), Peter
I Island (new record), Terre Adélie
(Vicente and Arnaud, 1974), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912) and Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958); from 4 m (Vicente and
Arnaud, 1974) to 640 m (Hain, 1990).
Class Bivalvia Linnaeus, 1758
Subclass Protobranchia Pelseneer, 1889
Order Nuculida Dalí, 1889
Family Nuculidae Gray, 1824
Genus Nucula Lamarck, 1799
Nucula austrobenthalis Dell, 1990 (Fig. 70)
Nucula austrobenthalis Dell, 1990: 6, figs. 1, 3.
Material studied: 4 spm. (7.4 x 5.9 - 13.6 x 10.0 mm), MB29.
Remarks : In spite of there being few
records of this species it is clearly separable
as an elongate species from deeper-water,
without similar species in Antarctic waters.
The other deeper-water species of this
genus, N. notobenthalis Thiele, 1912 from
the Davis Sea at 2725 m depth, is more
rounded and has a shorter anterior end.
85
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Distribution : Drake Passage (57-62°
S, 68-75° W) (Dell, 1990), Belling-
shausen (Dell, 1990; this study).
Amundsen and Ross Seas (Dell, 1990);
from 3304 m (new record) to 4209 m
(Dell, 1990).
Family Nuculanidae H. and A. Adams, 1858
Genus Propeleda Iredale, 1924
Propeleda longicaudata (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 71)
Leda longicaudata Thiele, 1912: 229, pl. 17, fig. 22.
Poroleda longicaudata: Hedley, 1916: 18; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 5.
Propeleda longicaudata: Powell, 1951: 77; Powell, 1958: 171; Dell, 1964: 146; Egorova, 1982: 56: figs.
238-241; Dell, 1990: 15, figs. 51-52; Hain, 1990: 80, pl. 11, figs. 4a-b; Linse, 1997: 46.
Material studied: 1 spm. (16.3 x 6.1 mm), MB13; 1 spm. (15.0 x 6.0 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (9.0 x 3.5
mm), MB33; 3 spm. (2.0 x 1.1 - 3.0 x 1.8 mm), PA41.
Distribution : Circumantarctic. Weddell
Sea (Hain, 1990), cited for the South Sand-
wich Islands (Linse, 1997), South Georgia,
South Orkney and South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic Península
(Dell, 1990; this study), Bellingshausen
Sea off Adelaide Island (Powell, 1951; this
study), Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997),
Antipodes Islands (50° S, 179° E) and Ross
Sea (Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Hedley,
1916), Wilkes Land (Powell, 1958), Shack-
leton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982) and from
Amery Ice Shelf to Mac Robertson Land
(Powell, 1958); from 43 to 2100 m (Dell,
1990).
Family Yoldiidae Habe, 1977
Genus Yoldia Móller, 1842
Yoldia eightsi (Couthouy in Jay, 1839) (Fig. 72)
Nucula eightsi Couthouy in Jay, 1839: 113, pl. 1, figs. 12-13.
Yoldia eightsi: Melvill and Standen, 1907: 143; Hedley, 1911: 3; Dell, 1964: 147, pl. 2, fig. 11; Nicol,
1966: 11, pl. 1, figs. 6-8; Rabarts and Whybrow, 1979: 177, figs. 3-5, 8-10, 14a-b, 15a-b; Dell,
1990: 10, figs. 2, 5; Troncoso et al. , 2001: 106, fig. 33.
Yoldia subaequilateralis Smith, 1875: 73; 1879: 187, pl. 9, fig. 18; 1885: 243; 1902: 211. Soot-Ryen,
1951: 6; Powell, 1957: 114.
Yoldia kerguelensis Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 207, pl. 3 (8), fig. 65.
Yoldia woodwardi Hanley: Pelseneer, 1903: 10; Lamy, 1906b; 19; 1911a: 29; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 7, figs.
1-6 (no Hanley, 1860).
Material studied: 65 spm. (18.0 x 11.9 - 47.8 x 27.1 mm), PA22; 20 spm. (26.8 x 16.9 - 44.1 x 26.8 mm),
PA23; 67 spm. (5.1 x 3.4 - 18.5 x 11.3 mm), DEC.
Remarks : Soot-Ryen (1951) consid-
ered the Magellanic species Y. wood-
wardi Hanley, 1860 as a júnior synonym
and, since his work, several authors
have followed him. But Rabarts and
Whybrow (1979) revised this genus
synonymizing Y. subaequilateralis Smith,
1875 and Y. kerguelensis Thiele and
Jaeckel, 1931 and reporting the misiden-
tification of some specimens named Y.
woodwardi, by Pelseneer (1903), Lamy
(1906b, 1911a) and Soot-Ryen
(1951),concluding that two species are
valid for the Southern Ocean and
neighboring areas: Y. eightsi and Y.
woodwardi, the latter restricted to the
Falkland /Malvinas Islands and South
Atlantic Ocean.
86
ALDEA AND TroncOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Distribution : Cited for the Weddell
Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003), South Sand-
wich, South Georgia (Dell, 1990) and
South Orkney Islands (Melvill and
Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990), Eastern
Antarctic Peninsula (Dell, 1990), South
Shetland Islands (Jay, 1839; Lamy, 1911a;
Dell, 1990; this study). Western Antarc-
tic Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a; Dell, 1990;
this study) and Peter I Island (Soot-
Ryen, 1951), also in Falkland /Malvinas,
Staten Island, Tierra del Fuego Island
(Dell, 1990) and Beagle Channel (Pelse-
NEER, 1903), Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Hed-
ley, 1911; Dell, 1990), Kerguelen Islands
(Smith, 1879; Smith, 1885; Thiele and
Jaeckel, 1931; Powell, 1957, Troncoso
et al., 2001) and ca. 10° E (Griffiths et
al., 2003); from 1 m (Melvill and
Standen, 1907) to 824 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Yoldiella Verrill and Bush, 1897
Yoldiella antárctica (Thiele, 1912) (Figs. 73-74)
Leda antárctica Thiele, 1912: 229, pl. 17, figs. 21-21a.
Yoldiella antárctica: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 5; Powell, 1958: 171; Dell, 1964: 145; Arnaud, 1973: 555;
Egorova, 1982: 55, figs. 230-231; Dell, 1990: 12, figs.17-18.
Material studied: 1 spm. (2.6 x 1.7 mm), PI7; 1 spm. (broken), MB14; 2 spm. (2.1 x 1.4 - 2.3 x 1.7
mm), PI27; 1 spm. (2.2 x 1.6 mm), MB30.
Remarks: The main characteristics that
mark the difference from other Antarctic
species are its very thin shell, a very small
hinge with six anterior and seven poste-
rior teeth, small and obliquely oriented,
and a more elongated form. In this sense,
Dell (1990) provides height/length
ratios for related Antarctic species that
allow the arranging of the species from
more elongated to more rounded shape:
Yoldiella antárctica (0.66 ± 0.01, n=6), Y.
profundorum (Melvill and Standen, 1912)
(0.69 ± 0.04, n=6), Y. ecaudata (Pelseneer,
1903) (0.74 ± 0.05, n=6) and Y. valettei
(Lamy, 1906) (0.75 ± 0.05, n=10).
Distribution: South Sandwich and
South Orkney Islands, Eastern Antarctic
Peninsula and South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990), Bellingshausen Sea and
Peter I Island (new records), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Griffiths et
al., 2003), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958) and Bouvet Island
(Linse, 2006); from 193 m (Powell,
1958) to 1873 m (new record).
Yoldiella ecaudata (Pelseneer, 1903) (Figs. 75-76)
Leda ecaudata Pelseneer, 1903: 22, pl. 6, figs. 77-78; Thiele, 1912: 229, pl. 17, figs. 20-20a.
Yoldiella ecaudata: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 5; Dell, 1964: 145; Egorova, 1982: 55, figs. 234-237; Dell, 1990:
12: 15-16.
Material studied: 1 spm. (2.8 x 1.9 mm), MB3; 14 spm. (1.2 x 1.0 - 2.3 x 1.8 mm), MB36; 7 spm. (1.1
x 0.8 - 2.3 x 1.8 mm), PA41.
Remarks: A hinge with large teeth , a
marked postero-ventral rostrum and
rounded shape (see remarck of Y. antartica )
differentiate this species from the others.
Distribution: Western Antarctic
Peninsula (Dell, 1990; this study).
Bellingshausen Sea to off Thurston
Island (Pelseneer, 1903; this study),
Ross Sea, Balleny Islands (Dell, 1990)
and Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egoro-
va, 1982); from 265 to 2525 m (Dell,
1990).
87
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Yoldiella oblonga (Pelseneer, 1903) (Figs. 77-78)
Leda oblonga Pelseneer, 1903: 23, pl. 6, figs. 79-80; Hedley, 1916: 17; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 6.
Yoldiella oblonga : Egorova, 1982: 56, figs. 232-233; Hain, 1990: 79, pl. 11, figs. la-b.
Material studied: 1 sh. (broken), MB9; 1 spm.
Remarles: Carcelles (1953) was the
first author to inelude this species as
Yoldiella. Due to its Tindaria- like form there
are no similar species in Antarctic waters.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), Bellingshausen Sea (Pelse-
Yoldiella profundorum (Melvill
3 x 3.9 mm), MB14; 1 spm. (2.8 x 1.9 mm), MB36.
NEER, 1903; this study), cited for the
Ross Sea (Griffiths et al., 2003),
Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916)
and Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982);
from 459 to 2800 m (Pelseneer,
1903).
Standen, 1912) (Figs. 79-80)
Yoldia profundorum Melvill and Standen, 1912: 359, figs. 18-18b.
Yoldiella profundorum: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 6; Dell, 1990: 14, figs. 21-22; Branch et al., 1991: 53 (key).
Material studied: 3 spm. (2.9 x 2.1 - 3.8 x 2.8 mm), PA22; 1 spm. (2.0 x 1.4 mm), MB26; 86 spm. (1.7
x 1.0 - 3.2 x 2.2 mm), PI28; 1 spm. (3.3 x 2.2 mm)
spm. (1.5 x 0.9 - 1.5 x 0.9 mm), MB34; 1 spm. (2.1
PA41; 14 spm. (1.1 x 0.8 - 2.5 x 1.8 mm), PA42; 4
Remarles: A somewhat elongated hinge
with seven anterior and six posterior,
médium to large and weakly oblique teeth,
mark the difference from the similar species
Y. ecaudata (with nine anterior and seven
posterior strong teeth) and Y. antárctica (six
anterior and seven posterior small teeth).
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Melvill
and Standen, 1912), Drake Passage
; MB30; 33 spm. (1.0 x 0.6 - 2.1 x 1.3 mm), MB33; 2
x 1.6 mm), PA39; 16 spm. (1.0 x 0.6 - 2.1 x 1.4 mm),
spm. (1.2 x 0.9 - 1.9 x 1.1 mm), PA43.
{ca. 55-62° S, 61° W) (Dell, 1990),
Western Antarctic Peninsula, Belling-
shausen Sea to off Thurston Island,
and Peter I Island (new records),
Amundsen Sea {ca. 70° S, 99° W) (Dell,
1990), Marión and Prince Edward
Islands (Branch et al., 1991); from
157 m (new record) to 4758 m (Dell,
1990).
Yoldiella sabrina (Hedley, 1916) (Figs. 81-82)
Malletia sabrina Hedley, 1916: 18, pl. 1, figs. 3-4; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 9; Powell, 1958: 172; Dell, 1964:
149; Nicol, 1966: 17, pl. 1, figs. 3, 5; Egorova, 1982: 54, figs. 226-228.
Yoldiella sabrina: Dell, 1972: 24, figs. 8-9; 1990: 14, fig. 14; Hain, 1990: 79, pl. 11, figs. 2a-b.
Material studied: 3 spm. (5.8 x 3.9 - 5.9 x 3.9 mm), MB30; 5 spm. (4.2 x 2.7 - 6.9 x 4.2 mm), MB31; 1
spm. (6.0 x 3.9 mm), MB32; 1 spm. (6.1 x 4.1 mm), MB35; 2 spm. (1.9 x 1.2 - 4.2 x 2.8 mm), MB36.
Remarles: Similar in external mor-
phology to species of the genus Malletia
Desmoulins, 1832. Dell (1972) situated
this species as Yoldiella based on its
internal ligament, and he compared it
with the Southern Chile species Y.
chilenica (Dalí, 1908), very similar in
shell proportions and secondarily in the
hinge.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Shetland Islands (Dell,
1990), Bellingshausen Sea (new record),
Ross Sea (Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie and
Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916),
Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982) and Mac
Robertson Land (Powell, 1958); from
12 m (Hain, 1990) to 1847 m (new
record).
88
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Subclass Pteriomorphia Beurlen, 1944
Order Arcida Stoliczka, 1871
Family Arcidae Lamarck, 1809
Genus Bathyarca Kobelt, 1891
Bathyarca sinuata Pelseneer, 1903 (Fig. 83)
Bathyarca sinuata Pelseneer, 1903: 23, pl. 6, figs. 81-82; Lamy, 1911a: 27; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 9; Dell,
1990: 17, figs. 4, 10-11
Material studied: 6 spm. (6.2 x 5.0 - 8.6 x 6.9 mm), MB3; 4 spm. (6.1 x 4.3 - 9.0 x 6.2 mm), MB11; 1
spm. (6.9 x 4.7 mm), MB13; 11 spm. (4.8 x 3.6 - 8.8 x 7.0 mm), MB17; 6 spm. (6.0 x 4.5 - 8.0 x 6.0 mm),
MB30; 5 spm. (6.0 x 4.7 - 8.8 x 6.8 mm), MB31; 4 spm. (4.8 x 3.2 - 8.1 x 6.7 mm), MB35; 4 spm. (7.1 x
5.1 - 8.1 x 6.2 mm), MB38.
Remarks : The other species of the
genus cited for Antárctica is B. strebeli
(Melvill and Standen, 1907) from the
Weddell Sea, which is very different
in shell shape, presenting an oval
form.
Distribution : Cape Horn (Dell,
1990), Bellingshausen Sea (Pelseneer,
1903; Lamy, 1911a; this study) to off
Thurston Island (new record) and Ross
Sea (Dell, 1990); from 400 m (Pelse-
neer, 1903) to 2044 m (new record).
Family Limopsidae Dalí, 1895
Genus Limopsis Sassi, 1827
Limopsis knudseni Dell, 1990 (Fig. 84)
Limopsis knudseni Dell, 1990: 23, figs. 30-31.
Material studied: 1 spm. (7.4 x 7.6 mm), MB29.
Remarks : Dell (1990) described this
species after examination of many indi-
viduáis series of several Antarctic
species, concluding that the postero-
ventral elongated form of some individ-
uáis, together with the development of a
byssus in most of them, are definitive
and particular characteristics of the new
species. Our specimen have the umbos
larger than the figure of the holotype,
which may be eroded.
Distribution : South Atlantic Ocean
off South Georgia Island ( ca . 50° S, 43°
W), Cape Horn, Drake Passage (ca.
60° S, 69° W) (Dell, 1990) and
Bellingshausen Sea (Dell, 1990; this
study); from 1043 to 3693 m (Dell,
1990).
Limopsis lilliei Smith, 1915 (Fig. 85)
Limopsis lilliei Smith, 1915: 76, pl. 1, fig. 18; Powell, 1958: 172; Dell, 1964: 158, pl. 3, figs. 1-2; Nicol,
1966: 18, pl. 2, figs. 3, 6; Arnaud, 1973: 555; Egorova, 1982: 57, figs. 248-249; Dell, 1990: 20, figs.
32-33; Hain, 1990: 82, pl. 11, figs. 7a-b; Branch et al., 1991: 54.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.4 x 4.1 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (6.3 x 4.9 mm), PA25; 2 spm. (17.2 x 15.2 -
21.5 x 17.0 mm), LOW.
Remarks: According to Dell (1990) it hirtella Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889,
presents an affinity in shape with L. but that species apparently is confined
89
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
to the Magellanic Región (Dell, 1990).
Also, L. scotiana Dell, 1964 is cióse as
well, but its distribütion is in the Scotia
Are Islands (Dell, 1990).
Distribütion : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich, South Georgia
and South Orkney .Islands (Dell, 1990),
South Shetland Islands and Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Dell, 1990; this
study). Antipodes Islands ( ca . 179° E)
(Dell, 1990), Ross Sea (Smith, 1915;
Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Grilliths et
al., 2003), Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982),
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), Marión
and Prince Edward Islands (Branch et
al., 1991) and Bouvet Island (Linse,
2006); from 20 m (Dell, 1990; Hain,
1990) to 2100 m (Dell, 1990).
Limopsis longipilosa Pelseneer, 1903 (Fig. 86)
Limopsis longipilosa Pelseneer, 1903: 25, pl. 7, figs. 89-90; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 360: Soot-
Ryen, 1951: 9, figs. 7-8; Dell, 1964: 155; Egorova, 1982: 58, figs. 250-251.
Material studied: 1 spm. (2.2 x 2.5 mm), MB4; 1 spm. (3.3 x 3.5 mm), MB14; 1 spm. (2.3 x 2.7 mm),
MB33; 7 spm. (1.2 x 1.3 - 3.8 x 3.9 mm), MB36; 11 spm. (2.3 x 2.3 - 3.3 x 3.3 mm), MB37.
Remarks: L. mabilliana Dalí, 1908 is
similar in shape and periostracum, though
it differs in having the dorsal border
straighter with angulose anterior and pos-
terior ends. Dell (1990 pp. 20, 25-26) men-
tioned that L. longipilosa may correspond
to juvenile specimens of L. marionensis
Smith, 1885 or of L. tendía tenella Jeffreys,
1879, but L. tenella tenella inhabits deeper
waters (> 2400 m depth). Due to the con-
fusión that exists in this group of related
especies, we maintained L. longipilosa as a
valid species, though it is necessary to
make a comparative study of the hinge
and juvenile stages of several related
species (e.g. Malchus and Warén, 2005).
Distribütion: Weddell Sea (Melvill
and Standen, 1912), Western Antarctic
Peninsula (Soot-Ryen, 1951), Belling-
shausen Sea (Pelseneer, 1903; this
study) to off Thurston Island (new
record) and Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982),
but cited for the South Shetland Islands
as well (Carcelles, 1953). The bathyme-
try is from 90 m (Egorova, 1982) to 2579
m (Melvill and Standen, 1912).
Limopsis marionensis Smith, 1885 (Fig. 87)
Limopsis marionensis Smith, 1885: 254, pl.18, figs. 2-2b; 1915: 75; Dell, 1964: 152, pl. 3, figs. 6-14, pl.
4, figs. 1-2; Nicol, 1966: 22, pl. 2, figs. 1, 5; Egorova, 1982: 59, figs. 252-253; Okutani, 1986: 279
(table), pl. 2, fig. 12; Dell, 1990: 19, figs. 25-26; Hain, 1990: 82, pl. 12, figs. la-b; Branch et al.,
1991: 53 (key); Numanami et al., 1996: 211 (table), 213 (text), pl. 4, fig. 10; Osorio and Reid,
2004: 80, fig. 3b.
Felicia jousseaumi Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889: 116, pl. 7, figs. 9a-b.
(Right page) Figure 70. Nucula austrobenthalis , 12.0 x 8.9 mm, MB29. Figure 71. Propeleda longi-
caudata , 16.3 x 6.1 mm, MB13. Figure 72. Yoldia eightsi, 24.0 x 13.1 mm, PA22. Figures 73, 74.
Yoldiella antárctica , 2.6 x 1.7 mm, PI7. Figures 75-76. Yoldiella ecaudata, 2.8 x 1.9 mm, MB3.
Figures 77, 78. Yoldiella oblonga, 5.3 x 3.9 mm, MB14. Figure 79. Yoldiella profundorum, 2.9 x 2.1
mm, PA22. Figure 80. Yoldiella profundorum, 3.8 x 2.8 mm, PA22. Figure 81. Yoldiella sabrina, 412
x 2.7 mm, MB31. Figure 82. Yoldiella sabrina, 4.3 x 2.8 mm, MB31. Figure 83. Bathyarca sinuata,
6.9 x 4.7 mm, MB13. Figure 84. Limopsis knudseni, 7.4 x 7.6 mm, MB29. Figure 85. Limopsis
lilliei, 4.4 x 4.1 mm, PA21. Figure 86. Limopsis longipilosa, 2.2 x 2.5 mm, MB4. Figure 87. Limopsis
marionensis, 25.5 x 24.6 mm, MB37. Figure 88. Limopsis enderbyensis, 15.0 x 12.0 mm, LOW.
( Página derecha) Figuras 70-88. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
90
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
91
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Limopsis jousseaumei: Lamy, 1911a: 26; Thiele, 1912: 228 (text), pl. 17, fig. 14b; Powell, 1951: 78;
Soot-Ryen, 1951: 9; Stuardo, 1962: 7,.; figs. 1-6.
Limopsis laeviuscula Pelseneer, 1903: 24, pl. 7, figs. 91-92.
Limopsis granáis Smith, 1907b: 5, pl. 3, figs. 7-7b; Thiele, 1912: 228, pl. 17, figs. 14a, 15; Smith, 1915:
76; Hedley, 1916: 19.
Limopsis jousseaumi granáis: Powell, 1958: 173; Egorova, 1982: 57, figs. 245-247.
Material studied: 7 spm. (25.5 x 24.3 - 39.5 x 42.2 mm), MB37.
Remarks: The Magellanic species L.
hirtella Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889 has
an affinity with this species, though it is
more oval and equilateral. The numerous
species that have been synonymized
have been acceptedas such, because some
authors have examined many individu-
áis from several localities. According to
Dell (1990) L. hardingi Melvill and
Standen, 1914 from Falkland /Malvinas
Islands is a júnior synonym.
Distribution: Widespread Antarctic
and Sub-Antarctic distribution. Has
been cited from the Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich Islands, South
Orkney Islands, Falkland /Malvinas
Islands and Burdwood Bank (Dell,
1990), Beagle Channel (Rochebrune
and Mabille, 1889), Magellan Strait
and Tierra del Fuego Island (Dell, 1990)
and from several sites northward to
South Pacific coast: South of Chiloé
Islands (44° S) (Osorio and Reíd, 2004),
Seno de Reloncaví and Chiloé Islands
(41-42° S) (Cárdenas, Aldea and Val-
do vinos, in press), 39° S off Valdivia
(Dell, 1990), reaching off Algarrobo (33°
S) in central Chile (Stuardo, 1962); also
in South Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990)
and Western Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy,
1911a; Dell, 1990), off Adelaide Island
(Powell, 1951) and Bellingshausen Sea
(Pelseneer, 1903; Dell, 1990; this
study); Southwest Pacific Ocean (59° S,
160° W) (Dell, 1990), Ross Sea (Smith,
1907b; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990), cited
for the Scott and Balleny Islands (Grif-
fiths et al., 2003), Terre Adélie and
Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Powell, 1958;
Egorova, 1982), Amery Ice-Shelf
(Powell, 1958; Numanami et al., 1996),
cited for the Heard and Kerguelen
Islands (Dell, 1990), Mac Robertson
Land to Enderby Land (Powell, 1958),
Marión and Prince Edward Islands
(Smith, 1885; Branch et al., 1991) and
24° E (Okutani 1986); from 27 to 2804 m
(Dell, 1990). Has not been cited for
South Georgia Island, which is an
anomaly in the Biogeography of the
Southern Ocean (Dell, 1990).
Limopsis enderbyensis Powell, 1958 (Fig. 88)
Limopsis enáerbyensis Powell, 1958: 172, pl. 1, fig. 4; Dell, 1964: 159; Hain, 1990: 82, pl. 11, figs.
6a-b.
Material studied: 1 spm. (15.0 x 12.0 mm), LOW.
Remarks: This species looks similar
to the deeper-water species L. tenella da-
lli Lamy, 1912 from cióse to the Amund-
sen Sea (Dell, 1990), but that species is
characterized by a more inequilateral
shell.
Distribution: Only known in the
Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990), South
Shetland Islands (new record) and
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958); from
115 m (new record) to 673 m (Hain,
1990).
Family Philobryidae Bernard, 1897
Genus Adamar ca Pelseneer, 1903
92
ALDEA AND TroNCOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Adacnarca nitens Pelseneer, 1903 (Fig. 89)
Adacnarca nitens Pelseneer, 1903: 24, 41, pl. 7, figs. 83-88; Lamy, 1906b: 19; Smith, 1907b: 5, pl. 3,
fig. 6-6c; Hedley, 1911: 3; Lamy, 1911a: 27; Thiele, 1912: 228; Smith, 1915: 76; Hedley, 1916: 22;
Soot-Ryen, 1951: 13; Powell, 1958: 175; Dell, 1964: 172; Nicol, 1966: 31, pl. 4, figs. 9-10; Arnaud,
1973: 556; Egorova, 1982: 61, figs. 262-265; Dell, 1990: 31, figs. 38-39, 40, 43; Hain, 1990: 86, pl.
12, figs. 6a-b.
Material studied: 200 spm. (2.2 x 2.1 - 5.4 x 5.1 mm), PI5; 17 spm. (3.1 x 2.9 - 5.4 x 5.1 mm), PI8; 3
spm. (3.8 x 3.7 - 5.1 x 5.0 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (4.2 x 3.8 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (3.1 x 3.0 mm), PA22; 1
spm. (3.1 x 3.2 mm), MB36; 1 spm. (3.8 x 3.9 mm), MB38; 3 spm. (4.0 x 4.0 - 4.2 x 4.3 mm), PA39; 1
spm. (4.8 x 4.7 mm), LOW; 3 spm. (2,8 x 2,5 - 4.9 x 3.6 mm), DEC.
Remarks: A. polarsterni Egorova, 2003
seems to be an allied species, but it differs
in being more elongated and not having
a subcircular shape. A. limopsoides (Thiele,
1912) differs in having radial ribs and
larger hinge teeth.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Sandwich, South Georgia, South
Orkney Islands and Eastern Antarctic
Peninsula (Dell, 1990), South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990; this study). Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a; Dell,
1990; this study), Bellingshausen Sea
(Pelseneer, 1903; this study) and Peter I
Island (Soot-Ryen, 1951; this study). Cape
Hom (Dell, 1990), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907b;
Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990) to
163° E (Smith, 1915), Commonwealth
(Hedley, 1916) to Terre Adélie (Powell,
1958), Wilkes Land (Dell, 1990), Shackle-
ton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982), Amery Ice-
Shelf (Griffiths et al., 2003), Mac Robert-
son to Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), and
Bouvet Island (Linse, 2006); from 8 to 2350
m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Lissarca Smith, 1879
Lissarca notorcadensis Melvill and Standen, 1907 (Fig. 90)
Lissarca notorcadensis Melvill and Standen, 1907: 44, figs. 14-14a; Smith, 1915: 75, pl. 1, figs. 16-17;
Hedley, 1916: 19; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 15; Powell, 1951: 78; Powell, 1958: 175; Dell, 1964: 173;
Nicol, 1966: 36, pl. 4, figs. 2, 4, 6; Arnaud, 1973: 555; Egorova, 1982: 62, figs. 266-268; Okutani,
1986: 279 (table), pl. 2, figs. 13-14; Dell, 1990: 32, figs. 46, 58; Hain, 1990: 87, pl. 13, figs. 2a-b.
Arca gourdoni Lamy, 1910b: 393; 1911a: 28, pl. 1, figs. 21-22.
Lissarca gourdoni: Thiele, 1912: 228, pl. 18, figs. 3-3a.
Material studied: 1 spm. (7.0 x 6.6 mm), PA21; 36 spm. (2.9 x 2.8 - 6.1 x 6.2 mm), PA39; 49 spm. (1.6
x 1.5 - 4.3 x 4.4 mm), LOW; 2 spm. (4.5 x 3.2 - 4.5 x 3.2 mm), MAR.
Remarks: It is a variable species since
Cope and Linse (2006) found consider-
able morphological differences between
samples from the Scotia Are, the Ross
Sea and the Weddell Sea. The synonymy
of L. gourdoni (Lamy, 1911) was pro-
posed by Smith (1915). Two other
species of the genus, L. miliaris (Philippi,
1845) and L. rubrofusca (Smith, 1879)
differ in having more inequilateral
shells which are very similar, because
Dell (1990) remarks that the distinction
between both species has been difficult.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Sandwich, South Georgia (Dell,
1990), South Orkney (Melvill and
Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990), Falk-
land/Malvinas (Powell, 1951) and South
Shetland Islands (Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell,
1990; this study), Western Antarctic Penin-
sula (Lamy, 1911a; Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell,
1990; this study), Ross Sea (Smith, 1915;
Dell, 1990) to 163° E (Smith, 1915), Com-
monwealth (Hedley, 1916) to Terre Adélie
(Hedley, 1916; Powell, 1958), Wilkes
Land (Dell, 1990), Shackleton Ice Shelf
93
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
(Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), Amery Ice-Shelf, Mac
Robertson Land and Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958), probably in Kerguelen
Islands (Dell, 1990), and 24° E (Okutani,
1986); from 0 to 1890 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Philobrya Carpenter, 1872
Philobrya sublaevis Pelseneer, 1903 (Fig. 91)
Philobrya sublaevis Pelseneer, 1903: 25, pl. 7, figs. 93-94; Lamy, 1906b: 18, pl. 1, figs. 17-18; Lamy, 1911a:
25; Thiele, 1912: 227, pl. 17, fig. 11; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 361; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 192; Dell,
1964: 163, pl. 4, fig. 7, fig. 2 (N° 3, 15-16); Nicol, 1966: 28, pl. 4, figs. 3, 5, 7; Arnaud, 1973: 555; Dell,
1990: 27, figs. 41, 50; Hain, 1990: 84, pl. 12, figs. 4a-d; Numanami et al, 1996: 211 (table), pl. 4, fig. 1.
Philippiella sublaevis: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 12.
Hochstetteria sublaevis: Egorova, 1982: 60, figs. 257-259.
Philobrya limoides Smith, 1907b: 4, pl. 3, figs. 2-2b; Hedley, 1911: 3; Thiele, 1912: 268; Smith, 1915:
77; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931 : 191 .
Philippiella limoides: Hedley, 1916: 20; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 10.
Hochstetteria limoides: Powell, 1958: 173.
Philippiella bagei Hedley, 1916: 20, pl. 1, figs. 5-7; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 10.
Hochstetteria bagei: Powell, 1958: 174.
Philippiella orbiculata Hedley, 1916: 21, pl. 1, figs. 12-13.
Philobrya antárctica Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 190 ( nom . nov. for P. limoides Smith, 1907).
Material studied: 14 spm. (4.9 x 4.1 - 12.8 x 12.1 mm), PI5; 5 spm. (5.7 x 5.2 - 10.5 x 11.0 mm), PI8;
5 spm. (5.8 x 5.4 - 9.2 x 8.5 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (6.4 x 6.6 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (11.0 x 11.0 mm), PA22;
11 spm. (2.9 x 3.0 - 12.0 x 12.0 mm), PA39; 3 spm. (6.0 x 6.0 - 8.3 x 8.2 mm), LOW; 9 spm. (2.2 x 3.0
- 6.9 x 7.0 mm), DEC; 2 spm. (6.0 x 6.0 - 8.7 x 8.0 mm) MAR.
Remarks : It is a well known and
reported species, whose synonymies are
accepted (see Dell, 1990). The central
position of the straight umbo marks the
difference between this species and others
cited from neighboring areas, all of them
showing a certain degree of inequilater-
ality, e.g. P. c¡uadrata (Pfeffer, 1886) and P.
ungulata (Pfeffer, 1886). D-shape larvae
were identified following Egorova (1982).
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich (Dell, 1990),
South Georgia (Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell,
1990) and South Orkney Islands (Dell,
1990), Burdwood Bank (Melvill and
Standen, 1912), Eastern Antarctic
Peninsula (Dell, 1990), South Shetland
Islands and Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Lamy, 1911a; Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell,
1990; this study), Bellingshausen Sea
(Pelseneer, 1903) and Peter I Island
(Soot-Ryen, 1951; this study), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1907b; Hedley, 1911; Smith,
1915; Dell, 1990) to 163° E (Smith,
1915), Commonwealth to Terre Adélie
(Hedley, 1916), Wilkes Land (Dell,
1990), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Hedley,
1916; Egorova, 1982; Dell, 1990),
Amery Ice-Shelf (Griffiths et al ., 2003),
Mac Robertson to Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958), Syowa (Numanami et
al., 1996), South of Africa in South
Atlantic Ocean (34-35° S, 19-26° E)
(Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931), Bouvet
Island (Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931;
Linse, 2006) and ca. 10° E (Griffiths et
al., 2003); from 1 m (Dell, 1990; Hain,
1990) to 923 m (Dell, 1990).
Philobrya wandelensis Lamy, 1906 (Fig. 92)
Philobrya wandelensis Lamy, 1906a: 50; 1906b: 17, pl. 1, figs. 15-16; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 146;
Lamy, 1911a: 24; Melvill and Standen, 1912: 361; Hedley, 1916: 19; Thiele, 1912: 268; Dell, 1964:
167; Arnaud, 1973: 556; Dell, 1990: 29, figs. 42, 47-49.
94
ALDEA AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Hochstetteria wandelensis: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 11; Powell, 1958: 174.
Adacnarca wandelensis : Nicol, 1966: 33, pl. 3, figs. 4-5; Hain, 1990: 87, pl. 13, figs. la-b.
Material studied: 1 spm. (3.2 x 2.5 mm), PA20; 5 spm. (2.1 x 3.1 - 3.1 x 4.1 mm), DEC; 2 spm. (5.0 x
3.2 - 5.0 x 3.2 mm), MAR.
Remarks : Its strong inequilaterality
marks the difference between this
species and the other related species
with a lesser degree of inequilaterality
(P. quadrata (Pfeffer, 1886) and P. ungu-
lata (Pfeffer, 1886)), though P. crispa
Linse, 2002 from Tierra del Fuego
Island, is a strongly inequilateral
species, but differs in having periostra-
cal spines, that P. wandelensis does not
ha ve.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich, South Georgia
(Dell, 1990) and South Orkney Islands
(Melvill and Standen, 1907, 1912;
Dell, 1990), Burdwood Bank and Falk-
land/Malvinas Islands (Melvill and
Standen, 1912), Eastern Antarctic
Peninsula (Dell, 1990), South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990; this study), Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a; Dell,
1990; this study), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916), Amery
Ice-Shelf (Griffiths et al., 2003), Mac
Robertson to Enderby Land (Powell,
1958) and Bouvet Island (Linse, 2006);
from 5 m (Hedley, 1916) to 870 m
(Dell, 1990).
Order Mytilida Férussac, 1822
Family Mytilidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Dacrydium Torell, 1859
Dacrydium albidum Pelseneer, 1903 (Fig. 93)
Dacrydium albidum Pelseneer, 1903: 26, pl. 8, fig. 100; Thiele, 1912: 226, pl. 17, fig. 10; Soot-Ryen,
1951: 20; Nicol, 1966: 25, pl. 3, figs. 2, 8; Egorova, 1982: 63, figs. 269-270; Dell, 1990: 33, figs. 55-
57; Hain, 1990: 88, pl. 13, figs. 3a-b; Numanami et al., 1996: 211 (table), pl. 4, fig. 2.
Dacrydium modioliforme Thiele, 1912: 226, pl. 17, fig. 9; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 170; Soot-Ryen,
1951: 20; Powell, 1958: 175; Egorova, 1982: 64, figs. 271-272.
Material studied: 9 spm. (2.1 x 2.5 - 2.8 x 3.4 mm), MB30; 4 spm. (1.8 x 2.1 - 3.6 x 4.1 mm), MB34; 4
spm. (2.1 x 2.4 - 3.6 x 4.0 mm), MB38; 1 spm. (2.1 x 2.3 mm), PA41.
Remarks : Nicol (1966) and Dell
(1990) considered that D. molioliforme
Thiele, 1912, from the Davis Sea, may be
a synonym.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Shetland Islands (Dell,
1990), Western Antarctic Peninsula (new
record), Bellingshausen Sea (Pelseneer,
1903; Dell, 1990; this study), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), Amery Ice-Shelf (Pow-
ell, 1958), Enderby Land (Thiele and
Jaeckel, 1931) and Syowa (Numanami
et al., 1996); from 122 m (Dell, 1990) to
4636 m (Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931).
Also, Griffiths et al. (2003) indicated
this species in several sites off Africa in
the South Atlantic Ocean.
Order Limida Waller, 1978
Family Limidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Limatula S. V. Wood, 1839
Limatula hodgsoni (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 94)
95
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Lima hodgsoni Smith, 1907b: 6, pl. 3, figs. 8-8b; Hedley, 1911: 3; Thiele, 1912: 226; Smith, 1915: 77;
Hedley, 1916: 24; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 167.
Limatula hodgsoni: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 20; Powell, 1958: 177; Dell, 1964: 184; Nicol, 1966: 43, pl. 5,
figs. 6-7; Arnaud, 1973: 556; Egorova, 1982: 66, figs. 285-287; Okutani, 1986: 279 (table), pl. 2,
figs. 18-19; Dell, 1990: 53, fig. 95; Hain, 1990: 91, pl. 13, figs. 7a-f; Numanami et al., 1996: 211
(table), 213 (text), pl. 4, fig. 3; Page and Linse, 2002: 819 (table, text); Linse and Page, 2003: 290,
figs. le, 3 (prodissoconch); Alien, 2004: 2645.
Lima closei Hedley, 1916: 23, pl. 2, fig. 16.
Limatula closei: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 20; Dell, 1964: 184; Egorova, 1982: 65, fig. 288.
Material studied: 2 spm. (11.5 x 9.3 - 29.3 x 22.7 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (9.0 x 7.6 mm), MB30; 9 spm.
(2.1 x 1.9 - 12.1 x 10.0 mm), MB31; 6 spm. (1.4 x 1.1 - 36.2 x 27.9 mm), PA39; 2 spm. (10.9 x 14.0 - 24.0
x 18.0 mm), LOW.
Remarks : Page and Linse (2002) situ-
ated it as sister species of L. ovalis (Thiele,
1912) and L. pygmaea (Philippi, 1845), uti-
lizing molecular techniques; they also
established that they have indirect devel-
opment with lecitotrophic larvae (Linse
and Page, 2003). This species differs from
L. ovalis and L. pygmaea in having a more
developed concentric sculpture with lamel-
lae. Dell (1964) commented that L. closei
(Hedley, 1916) is an allied species and Dell
(1990) situated it as a júnior synonym.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Sandwich, South Georgia, South
Orkney Islands, Eastern Antarctic Penín-
sula and Cape Horn (Dell, 1990), South
Shetland Islands and Western Antarctic
Península (Dell, 1990; this study), Belling-
shausen Sea (new record), Ross Sea (Smith,
1907b; Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell,
1990) to 163° E (Smith, 1915), Macquarie
Island (Tomlin 1948 in Powell, 1960),
Commonwealth to Terre Adélie, and
Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis
Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982; Dell,
1990), Amery Ice-Shelf (Numanami et al.,
1996), Enderby Land (Powell, 1958), 24°
E (Okutani, 1986), cited ca. 10° E (Grif-
fiths et AL., 2003) and Bouvet Island
(Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931; Soot-Ryen,
1951); from 6 m (Dell, 1990) to 1814 m
(new record).
Limatula pygmaea (Philippi, 1845) (Fig. 95)
Lima pygmaea Philippi, 1845: 56; Smith, 1885: 292; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 148; Thiele, 1912:
251, pl. 17, figs. 6-8.
Radula pygmaea: Smith, 1879: 191, pl. 10, fig. 16; Lamy, 1906b: 15; 1911a: 22.
Limatula pygmaea: Powell, 1957: 116; Dell, 1964: 182, pl. 2, fig. 13; Arnaud, 1973: 557; Dell, 1990:
55; Branch et al., 1991: 50 (key); Linse, 1997: 52; Troncoso et al., 2001: 109, fig. 37; Page and
Linse, 2002: 819 (table, text); Linse and Page, 2003: 290, figs. la-c (prodissoconch); Alien, 2004:
2647.
Limea martiali Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889: 124.
Lima falklandica Adams, 1864: 509; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 167.
Limatula falklandica: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 21; Dell, 1964: 183.
Material studied: 5 spm. (6.2 x 4.6 - 8.1 x 6.3 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (7.5 x 6.0 mm), LOW.
Remarks: This species resembles L.
ovalis (Thiele, 1912), which is smaller and
narrower. In this sense, Page and Linse
(2002) considered them sister species, not
synonyms, utilizing molecular techniques;
but Allen (2004) referred to L. ovalis as a
júnior synonym of L. pygmaea without
mentioning the matter. Linse and Page
(2003) also evidenced the development of
species by means of observation to prodis-
soconchs, concluding that both L. ovalis
and L. pygmaea having direct brooding
development. The synonymies of Limea
martiali Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889 and
L. falklandica (Adams, 1864) are accepted
(see Dell, 1990).
96
ALDEA AND TroncOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Distribution : South Sandwich (Soot-
Ryen, 1951), South Georgia (Dell, 1990)
and South Orkney Islands (Melvill and
Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990), Burdwood
Bank, South Atlantic Ocean (Dell, 1990)
and Falkland /Malvinas Islands, Beagle
Channel (Linse, 1997) and Cape Horn
(Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889; Dell,
1990), Staten Island, Magellan Strait and
Tierra del Fuego Island (Dell, 1990),
South Shetland Islands (Soot-Ryen,
1951; Dell, 1990; this study). Western
Antarctic Península (Lamy, 1906b, 1911a;
Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell, 1990; this study)
and Bellingshausen Sea (Dell, 1990),
Macquarie Island (Tomlin 1948 in
Powell, 1960), Terre Adélie (Griffiths
et al., 2003), Kerguelen Islands (Smith,
1879; Smith, 1885; Thiele, 1912; Thiele
and Jaeckel, 1931; Powell, 1957; Tron-
coso et al., 2001), Marión and Prince
Edward Islands (Smith, 1885; Branch et
al., 1991); from 3 m (Melvill and
Standen, 1907) to 3714 m (Dell, 1990).
Limatula simillima Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 96)
Limatula simillima Thiele, 1912: 226, pl. 17, fig. 4; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 20; Powell, 1958: 177; Dell,
1964: 185, pl. 2, fig. 12; Nicol, 1966: 46, pl. 4, fig. 8; Dell, 1990: 53, fig. 97; Branch et al, 1991: 50
(key); Page and Linse, 2002: 819 (table, text); Linse and Page, 2003: 290, fig. lf (prodissoconch);
Alien, 2004: 2648.
Limatula similliana (sic): Flain, 1990: 92, pl. 14, figs. 2a-c.
Material studied: 2 spm. (6.8 x 4.8 - 8.3 x 6.0 mm), MB31; 1 spm. (broken), MB37.
Remarks: Linse and Page (2003)
established an indirect mode of devel-
opment with lecitotrophic larvae. Mole-
cular techniques allowed the establish-
ing of its phylogenetic distance from
other species (Page and Linse, 2002),
which is reflected externally by having a
more elongated shell.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), Bellingshausen Sea (new record),
Ross Sea (Dell, 1990), Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912), Mac Robertson to
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958) and
Marión and Prince Edward Islands
(Branch et al., 1991); from 64 m (Dell,
1990) to 1426 m (new record).
Order Ostreida Férussac, 1822
Family Pectinidae Rafinesque, 1815
Genus Adamussium Thiele, 1934
Adamussium colbecki (Smith, 1902)
Peden colbecki Smith, 1902: 212, pl. 25, fig. 11; 1907b: 6, pl. 3, figs. 9-9a; Melvill and Standen, 1907:
146; Hedley, 1911: 3; Lamy, 1911a: 23; Thiele, 1912: 225, pl. 17, figs. 1-la.
Chlamys colbecki: Smith, 1915: 77; Hedley, 1916: 22.
Adamussium colbecki: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 16; Powell, 1958: 176; Nicol, 1966: 40, pl. 2, fig. 7, pl. 3, figs.
1, 7; Arnaud, 1973: 556; Egorova, 1982: 64, figs. 275-280; Dell, 1990: 35, figs. 59-60; Hain, 1990:
89, fig. 4.2; Numanami et al., 1996: 212 (table, text), pl. 4, fig. 6.
Peden racovitzai Pelseneer, 1903: 27, pl. 8, figs. 101-102; Lamy, 1906b: 16, pl. 1, fig. 19-21.
Material studied: 1 sh. (broken), MB2; 2 sh. (broken), MB3; 1 sh. (broken), PI5; 1 sh. (broken), PI7;
4 sh. (broken), MB26; 13 sh. (broken), MB30; 10 sh. (broken), MB31; 1 sh. (broken), MB34; 2 sh.
(broken), MB35; 1 sh. (broken), MB36.
Remarks: All specimens of BENTART this is a well-known species illustrated
cruises correspond to fragmented shells, in several works. The synonymy of
and these were not photographed since Pecten racovitzai Pelseneer, 1903 was
97
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
suggested by Lamy (1911a) and
accepted in subsequent works.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Melvill
and Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990; Hain,
1990), South Sandwich, South Orkney
and South Shetland Islands (Dell,
1990), Western Antarctic Península
(Lamy, 1906b, 1911a; Dell, 1990),
Bellingshausen Sea (Pelseneer, 1903;
this study) and Peter I Island (Soot-
Ryen, 1951; this study), Scott and
Balleny Islands (Griffiths et al., 2003),
Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Smith, 1907b;
Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990),
Commonwealth to Terre Adélie and
Shackleton Ice Shell (Hedley, 1916),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova,
1982), Mac Robertson to Enderby Land
(Powell, 1958), Syowa (Numanami et
al., 1996) and ca. 10° E (Grifftiths et
al., 2003); from 2 m (Egorova, 1982) to
4545 m (Melvill and Standen, 1907).
Genus Hyalopecten Verril, 1897
Hyalopecten pudicus (Smith, 1885) (Fig. 97)
Peden pudicus Smith, 1885: 302, pl. 21, figs. 8-8b; Pelseneer, 1903: 26.
Peden undatus Verrill and Smith, in Verrill, 1885: 444, pl. 44, fig. 8.
Hyalopecten undatus: Dell, 1990: 37.
Hyalopecten diledus Verrill and Bush, in Verrill, 1897: 80.
Material studied: 1 spm. (16.5 x 17.0 mm), MB38.
Remarks: This species was assigned
to Hyalopecten after Carcelles (1953).
Dell (1990) considered Hyalopecten
dilectus Verrill and Bush, 1897 as a
júnior synonym and cited it for several
Antarctic points, though it seems to
have a greater distribution. Hyalopecten
arntzi Egorova, 1999, from the Weddell
Sea, is very similar, but according to its
author, the main difference is in the
concavity of the shell, greater than in
H. pudicus and in the distinct size of
the ears.
Distribution: South Sandwich
Islands (Dell, 1990), cited for the Burd-
wood Bank and the South Shetland
Islands (Carcelles, 1953), Belling-
shausen Sea (Pelseneer, 1903; this
study), South Tasmania (48° S, 148° E)
(Dell, 1990) and Marión Island (Smith,
1885); from 400 m (Pelseneer, 1903) to
5453 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Prope amussiidae Abbott, 1954
Genus Cyclochlamys Finlay, 1926
Cydochlamys gaussianus (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 98)
Camptonedes gaussianus Thiele, 1912: 226, pl. 17, fig. 2; Dijkstra and Kohler, 2008: 37, fig. le.
Cyclopeden gaussianus: Egorova, 1982: 65, figs. 281-282; Hain, 1990: 89, pl. 13, figs. 4a-c;
Numanami et al., 1996: 212 (table, text), pl. 4, figs. 4, 7.
Material studied: 2 spm. (1.2 x 1.1 - 2.8 x 2.7 mm), PA39.
Remarks: Several species have been
described from the Southern Ocean,
being necessary a revisión of the group
since the unknowns status of some
species. The individuáis found agree
with Thiele's description (1912), with
Egorova's figures (1982) and with the
specimens figured by Hain (1990) and
Numanami et al. (1996). The taxonomie
position of this species is Cyclochlamys
gaussianus (Thiele, 1912) (Dijkstra and
Kohler, 2008).
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), Western Antarctic Península (new
98
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
record), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; et al., 1996); from 157 m (new record) to
Egorova, 1982) and Syowa (Numanami 481 m (Hain, 1990).
Genus Cyclopecten Verrill, 1897
Cyclopecten notalis (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 99)
Camptonectes notalis Thiele, 1912: 251, pl. 17, figs. 3-3a; Dijkstra and Kóhler, 2008: 39, fig. lf.
Palliolum notalis: Egorova, 1982: 64, figs. 283-284.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.1 x 4.0 mm), PI27; 4 spm. (3.0 x 3.0 - 7.0 x 6.9 mm), MB38.
Remarles: Although it has been
reported only by Thiele (1912) and
redrawn by Egorova (1982), the
description agrees with BENTART indi-
viduáis. According to Dijkstra and
Kóhler (2008) it belongs to Propeamus-
siidae as Cyclopecten notalis (Thiele,
1912).
Distribution: Bellingshausen Sea,
Peter I Island (new records) and Davis
Sea (Thiele, 1912); from 1324 m (new
record) to 3423 m (Thiele, 1912).
Cyclopecten pteriola (Melvill and Standen, 1907) (Fig. 100)
Pecten pteriola Melvill and Standen, 1907: 147, figs. 16-16a.
Cyclopecten pteriola: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 16; Dell, 1964: 141, fig. 1 (N°l); Hain, 1990: 90, pl. 13, figs. 5a-c.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.6 x 4.2 mm), MB36.
Remarles: The inequilateral shell and
marked concentric ridges of Cyclopec-
ten pteriola are conclusive to attribute
the species, which has been seldom
recorded.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990),
South Orkney Islands (Melvill and
Standen, 1907) and Bellingshausen Sea
(new record); from 16 m (Melvill and
Standen, 1907) to 560 m (new record).
Subclass PlETERODONTA Neumayr, 1884
Order Venerida Adams and Adams, 1856
Family Thyasiridae Dalí, 1901
Genus Genaxinus Iredale, 1930
Genaxinus debilis (Thiele, 1912) (Fig. 101)
Axinopsis debilis Thiele, 1912: 232, pl. 18, figs. 25-25a; Hedley, 1916: 27; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 30.
Genaxinus debilis: Dell, 1964: 208; Arnaud, 1973: 557; Egorova, 1982: 70, figs. 314-315; Dell, 1990:
57, figs. 93-94.
Genaxinus bongraini (Lamy): Nicol, 1966: 63, pl. 6, figs. 1-2 (no Lamy, 1910).
Material studied: 107 spm. (1.8 x 1.6 - 3.3 x 3.3 mm), PI5; 141 spm. (2.0 x 1.9 - 3.1 x 3.0 mm), PI6; 40
spm. (1.7 x 1.6 - 2.8 x 2.6 mm), PI7; 49 spm. (2.0 x 1.8 - 3.3 x 3.0 mm), PI8; 5 spm. (2.0 x 1.9 - 3.0 x 2.9
mm), PA21; 4 spm. (2.1 x 2.1 - 2.9 x 2.7 mm), PA22; 1 spm. (broken), PA25; 58 spm. (1.0 x 0.9 - 2.1 x
2.0 mm), PI27; 1 spm. (1.1 x 1.1 mm), PI28; 1 spm. (2.1 x 2.1 mm), MB34; 1 spm. (2.0 x 2.0 mm), MB36;
7 spm. (1.6 x 1.5 - 1.9 x 1.8 mm), MB38; 8 spm. (1.1 x 1.0 - 2.1 x 2.1 mm), PA39; 6 spm. (1.1 x 0.9 - 1.8
x 1.7 mm), PA41; 1 spm. (1.5 x 1.4 mm), PA42; 244 spm. (1.9 x 1.8 - 3.8 x 3.9 mm), DEC.
99
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Remarks: This species resembles T.
dearborni Nicol, 1965, which differs in
having a more developed posterior
sinus, being larger, with weaker
concentric striae and having the ante-
rior border shorter and straighter. Dell
(1990) commented that Nicol's (1966)
specimens, reported as Genaxinus
bongraini, corresponded to G. debilis.
Hain (1990) cited this species as a
júnior synonym of T. bongraini (Lamy,
1910).
Distribution: South Sandwich, South
Georgia, South Orkney, Falkland /Malv-
inas and Tierra del Fuego Islands, and
Eastern Antarctic Peninsula (Dell, 1990),
South Shetland Islands, Western Antarc-
tic Peninsula and Bellingshausen Sea
(Dell, 1990; this study), Peter I Island
(new record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916), Davis
Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982) and
Mac Robertson Land (Dell, 1990); from 9
m (Dell, 1990) to 1873 m (new record).
Genus Thyasira Leach in Lamarck, 1818
Thyasira bongraini (Lamy, 1910) (Fig. 102)
Axinus bongraini Lamy, 1910b: 389; 1911a: 17, pl. 1, fig. 17;
Thyasira bongraini: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 30; Egorova, 1982: 70, figs. 311-313.
Thyasira cf. bongraini (Lamy): Dell, 1964: 207, fig. 4 (N°10-ll).
Genaxinus bongraini: Hain, 1990: 96, pl. 14, figs. 8a-b.
Material studied: 2 spm. (2.0 x 1.9 - 3.1 x 3.0 mm), PI6; 7 spm. (3.0 x 2.9 - 7.0 x 7.0 mm), PA22; 1
spm. (5.2 x 5.4 mm), DEC.
Remarks : T. dearborni Nicol, 1965 may
be a júnior synonym of T. bongraini , be-
cause Dell's (1964) specimens, cited as
T. cf. bongraini, have all the characteris-
tics of the species, and Dell (1990, p. 56,
figs. 91-92) detailed and figured individ-
uáis from Ross Sea assigned to T. dear-
borni, that agree with the original de-
scription of T. bongraini. Hain (1990) re-
ported specimens collected in the Wed-
dell Sea and he named Genaxinus bon-
graini as well, but as a sénior synonym of
G. debilis (Thiele, 1912). Summarizing, a
revisión of the genus in the Southern
Ocean is necessary.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Fíain, 1990),
South Shetland Island (new record).
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a;
Soot-Ryen, 1951; this study), Peter I Island
(Soot-Ryen, 1951; this study), Davis Sea
(Egorova, 1982) and Bouvet Island (Linse,
2006); from 9 to 850 m (Hain, 1990). T. dear-
borni has been cited in the South Orkney
and the South Shetland Islands, Western
Antarctic Peninsula and the Ross Sea (Dell,
1990); from 39 to 1180 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Carditidae Fleming, 1828
Genus Cy clocar dia Conrad, 1867
Cyclocardia astartoides (Martens, 1878) (Fig. 103)
Cardita astartoides Martens, 1878: 25; Smith, 1885: 212, pl. 15, figs, 2-2c; Smith, 1902: 211; Lamy,
1906b: 14; Smith, 1907b: 2; Hedley, 1911: 3; Lamy, 1911a: 21; Thiele, 1912: 230, pl. 18, fig. 10;
Smith, 1915: 77.
Venericardia astartoides: Hedley, 1916: 30, pl.3, figs. 33-34; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 216.
Cyclocardia astartoides: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 25; Powell, 1957: 121; 1958: 177; Dell, 1964: 189; Nicol,
1966: 49, pl. 4, fig. 1, pl. 5, figs. 1-2; Arnaud, 1973: 558; Egorova, 1982: 72, figs. 331-333;
Okutani, 1986: 279 (table), pl. 2, figs. 16, 22; Dell, 1990: 59, figs. 98-99; Hain, 1990: 94, pl. 14,
figs. 4a-b; Numanami et al., 1996: 211 (table), 213 (text), pl. 4, fig. 5; Troncoso et al., 2001: 109,
fig. 38.
100
Aldea AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Cardita antárctica Smith, 1907b: 2, pl. 2, figs. 15-15a.
Cyclocardia antárctica: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 24.
Material studied: 3 spm. (6.1 x 5.8 - 8.9 x 10.1 mm), MB4; 6 spm. (8.3 x 6.8 - 20.5 x 16.3 mm), PA20;
2 spm. (6.7 x 5.2 - 8.2 x 6.4 mm), PA21; 2 spm. (8.0 x 6.7 - 14.0 x 10.9 mm), PA25; 1 spm. (3.5 x 3.5
mm), MB37; 5 spm. (0.9 x 0.9 - 9.0 x 7.0 mm), PA39; 4 spm. (1.1 x 1.1 - 24.0 x 19.1 mm), LOW.
Remarks : Dell (1964) remarked that
C. astar toides has variations according to
geographic distribution, being possibly
the sénior synonym of the species C.
intermedia (Thiele, 1912) and C. antárctica
(Smith, 1907). The same author (Dell,
1990) validated the synonymy of C.
antárctica, but left in doubt the syn-
onymy of C. intermedia ; Hain (1990)
included C. intermedia as a júnior
synonym of C. astartoides, though
Egorova (1982) reported it as a valid
species. In this study we only consid-
ered C. antárctica in the synonymy of C.
astartoides, following Dell (1990) who
examined many specimens from several
localities.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Soot-
Ryen, 1951; Hain, 1990), South Sand-
wich (Dell, 1990), South Georgia (Soot-
Ryen, 1951; Carcelles, 1953; Dell,
1990), South Orkney (Dell, 1990) and
South Shetland Islands (Soot-Ryen,
1951; Dell, 1990; this study). Western
Antarctic Península (Lamy, 1906b; Lamy,
1911a; Dell, 1990; this study), Belling-
shausen Sea to off Thurston ísland (new
records), Beagle Channel and Magellanic
Area (Griffiths et al., 2003), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1902; Smith, 1907b; Hedley,
1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990) to 163° E
(Smith, 1915), Balleny and Macquarie
Islands (Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie
(Powell, 1958), Wilkes Land (Dell,
1990), Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley,
1916) to Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912;
Egorova, 1982), Heard Island (Smith,
1885) to Kerguelen Islands (Smith, 1885;
Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931; Powell,
1957; Dell, 1990; Troncoso et al.,
2001), Amery Ice Shelf (Numanami et
al., 1996), Mac Robertson to Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958), Syowa
(Numanami et al., 1996), 24° E
(Okutani, 1986) and cited ca. 10° E (Grif-
fiths et al., 2003), and Bouvet Island
(Soot-Ryen, 1951; Linse, 2006); from 2 m
(Hain, 1990) to 3248 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Galeommatidae Gray, 1840
Genus My sella Angas, 1877
Mysella antárctica (Smith, 1907) (Figs. 104-105)
Tellimya antárctica Smith, 1907b: 3, pl. 2, figs. 16-16b; 1915: 78.
Mysella antárctica: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 33; Dell, 1964: 216, fig. 3 (N°12, 19); Dell, 1990: 42, figs. 78-79;
Linse, 1997: 56.
Material studied: 2 spm. (1.1 x 1.0 - 2.2 x 1.8 mm), PA41; 1 spm. (1.9 x 1.4 mm), PA42; 3 spm. (2.1
x 1.7 - 2.8 x 2.1 mm), DEC.
Remarks: The specimens agree with
the original description of Smith (1907b),
with strong and short teeth, globose form
and well defined umbo due to the con-
cavity of the dorsal-posterior margin;
however, they do not agree with the spec-
imens figured by Dell (1990, figs. 78-79),
whose teeth are long and narrow and the
dorsal-posterior and anterior margins
straighter. Several species have been
described from the neighboring areas; in
this sense, M. ovalis (Thiele, 1912) is very
similar, though according to the original
figures it is less elongated and it has a
less concave dorsal-posterior margin. M.
gibbosa (Thiele, 1912) has the hinge with
small and subequal teeth and the dorsal-
posterior margin almost straight. M.
101
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
narchii Dias-Passos and Domaneschi,
2006 differs in having a very long ante-
rior tooth and a shorter posterior.
Distribution : South Shetland Islands
(Dell, 1990; this study) and Western
Antarctic Peninsula (new record),
Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997), Ross Sea
(Smith, 1907b; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990)
and Wilkes Land (Dell, 1990); from 29
m (Dell, 1990) to 1272 m (new record).
Mysella gibbosa (Thiele, 1912) (Figs. 106-107)
Tellimya gibbosa Thiele, 1912: 230, pl. 18, figs. 12-12a.
Mysella gibbosa: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 33; Egorova, 1982: 71, figs. 307-308; Dell, 1990: 45, figs. 74-75.
Material studied: 3 spm. (1.6 x 1.1 - 3.9 x 3.1 mm), MB36.
Remarks : Hinge of the right valve
with two, short subequal teeth. The
teeth of the hinge and the shape of the
shell differ from similar species (see
above the remarks on M. antárctica).
Distribution : Bellingshausen Sea
(new record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990),
Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982)
and Mac Robertson Land (Dell, 1990);
from 64 to 752 m (Dell, 1990).
Genus Pseudokellya Pelseneer, 1903
Pseudokellya cardiformis (Smith, 1885) (Fig. 108)
Kelly a cardiformis Smith, 1885: 202, pl. 11, figs. 6-6b.
Pseudokellya cardiformis : Pelseneer, 1903: 48; Lamy, 1911a: 20; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 223; Soot-
Ryen, 1951: 28; Powell, 1957: 122; Dell, 1964: 199, pl. 6, figs. 3-4; 1990: 40, figs. 66-67; Hain,
1990: 98, pl. 15, figs. 3a-b; Troncoso et al., 2001: 107, fig. 34.
Pseudokellya stilhvelli Hedley, 1916: 31, pl. 3, figs. 38-39; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 28; Dell, 1964: 200; Nicol,
1966: 56, pl. 6, fig. 3, pl. 7, fig. 4; Egorova, 1982: 72, figs. 326-327.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.1 x 4.1 mm), PA21.
Remarks: Nicol (1966) and Dell
(1990) suggested that P. stillwelli Hedley,
1916 is part of the variability of this
species regarding the strength of sculp-
ture, and is,therefore, a synonym.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich and South
Georgia Islands, Burdwood Bank, Falk-
land/Malvinas and South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990), Western Antarctic
Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a; Dell, 1990; this
study), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990), Macquarie
Island (Carcelles, 1953), Terre Adélie
(Hedley, 1916), Davis Sea (Hedley,
(Right page) Figure 89. Adacnarca nitens, 4.2 x 3.8 mm, PA21. Figure 90. Lissarca notorcadensis ,
7.0 x 6.6 mm, PA21. Figure 91. Philobrya sublaevis, 10.5 x 11.0 mm, PI8. Figure 92. Philobrya
wandelensis , 3.2 x 2.5 mm, PA20. Figure 93. Dacrydium albidum, 2.6 x 3.2 mm, MB30. Figure
94. Limatula hodgsoni, 1 1.5 x 9.3 mm, PA20. Figure 95. Limatula pygmaea, 6.2 x 4.6 mm, PA20.
Figure 96. Limatula simillima , 6.8 x 4.8 mm, MB31. Figure 97. Hyalopecten pudicus, 16.5 x 17.0
mm, MB38. Figure 98. Cyclochlamys gaussianus, 2.5 x 2.3 mm, PA39. Figure 99. Cyclopecten
notalis , 6.7 x 6.4 mm, MB38. Figure 100. Cyclopecten pteriola , 4.6 x 4.2 mm, MB36. Figure 101.
Genaxinus debilis , 2.3 x 2.3 mm, PI7. Figure 102. Thyasira bongraini , 3.6 x 3.8 mm, PA22. Figure
103. Cyclocardia astartoides, 20.5 x 16.3 mm, PA20. Figures 104, 105. Mysella antárctica , 2.7 x 2.1
mm, DEC. Figures 106, 107. Mysella gibbosa, 3.0 x 2.4 mm, MB36.
(Página derecha) Figuras 89-107. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
102
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
103
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
1916; Egorova, 1982), Kerguelen Islands
(Smith, 1885; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931;
Powell, 1957; Troncoso et al ., 2001)
and cited for Marión and Prince Edward
Islands (Carcelles, 1953); from 20 m
(Powell, 1957) to 710 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Cyamiidae Philippi, 1845
Genus Cyamiocardium Soot-Ryen, 1951
Cyamiocardium denticulatum (Smith, 1907) (Fig. 109)
Cyamium denticulatum Smith, 1907b: 3, pl. 3, figs. 4, 4b; Lamy, 1911a: 19; Melvill and Standen,
1912: 363.
Cyamiocardium denticulatum: Powell, 1951: 116; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 26; Powell, 1957: 116; 1958: 175;
Dell, 1964: 203; Arnaud, 1973: 558; Dell, 1990: 50, figs. 80-83; Hain, 1990: 95, pl. 14, figs. 6a-b;
Linse, 1997: 56.
Material studied: 1 spm. (broken), MB4; 292 spm. (2.0 x 1.9 - 5.7 x 5.5 mm), PI5; 2 spm. (3.0 x 2.9 -
3.1 x 3.0 mm), PI7; 153 spm. (2.1 x 1.9 - 5.0 x 4.9 mm), PI8; 1 spm. (broken), PA21; 6 spm. (1.5 x 1.4
- 2.0 x 2.0 mm), PA41; 4 spm. (1.1 x 1.1 - 1.8 x 1.7 mm), PA42; 1 spm. (2.1 x 2.0 mm), PA43.
Remarks : Other similar spedes in Antarc-
tic and Sub-Antartic waters are Perrierina
crassilabrum Dell, 1964, C. dahli Soot-Ryen,
1957 and C. rotundatum (Thiele, 1912), which
differ by having more prominent radial
sculpture (P. crassilabrum and C. rotunda-
tum), or by its equilateral shape with central
umbo (C. dahli). C. denticulatum exhibits
more prominent growth lines, a fainter
radial sculpture and a subcentral umbo.
Distribution : Weddell Sea in 23-573 m
(Hain, 1990), South Orkney (Dell, 1990)
and Falkland /Malvinas Islands (Melvill
and Standen, 1912), Burdwood Bank
(Melvill and Standen, 1912; Dell, 1990)
and South Atlantic Ocean (54° S, 64° W)
(Dell, 1990), Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997),
Tierra del Fuego Island, South Shetland
Islands (Dell, 1990) and Western Antarc-
tic Peninsula (Lamy, 1911a; Dell, 1990;
this study), Peter I Island (Soot-Ryen,
1951; this study), off Thurston Island (new
record), Ross Sea (Smith, 1907b; Dell,
1990), ca. Terre Adélie (Griffiths et al.,
2003), Davis Sea (Dell, 1990), Kerguelen
Islands (Powell, 1957), Mac Robertson to
Enderby Land (Powell, 1958) and Bouvet
Island (Soot-Ryen, 1951; Linse, 2006); from
5 m (Dell, 1990) to 1272 m (new record).
Despite its widespread distribution, it has
not been cited in the South Georgia and
South Sandwich Islands (Dell, 1990).
Genus Cyamiomactra Bernard, 1897
Cyamiomactra laminifera (Lamy, 1906) (Fig. 110)
Mactra laminifera Lamy, 1906a: 45.
Cyamiomactra laminifera: Lamy, 1906b: 11, pl. 1, figs. 10-12; 1911a: 18; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 28; Dell,
1964: 202, pl. 6, fig. 9-10; Nicol, 1966: 51, pl. 7, figs. 1, 7-8; Dell, 1990: 50, fig. 100.
Cyamium laminifera: Thiele, 1912: 270.
Diplodonta incerta Smith, 1907b: 4, pl. 3, figs. 5-5a.
Cyamiomactra robusta Nicol, 1964: 60, pl. 6, figs. 1-3; 1966: 53, pl. 8, figs. 1, 6-7; Hain, 1990: 95, pl.
14, figs. 5a-b.
Material studied: 1 spm. (5.6 x 4.1 mm), PI8; 1 spm. (6.3 x 5.0 mm), PA20; 1 spm. (10.0 x 7.1 mm), MAR.
Remarks : The synonymy of variability of the postero-ventral rib, the
Cyamiomactra robusta Nicol, 1964 was same as Diplodonta incerta Smith, 1907,
suggested by Dell (1990) based on the whose synonymy was accepted before.
104
ALDEA and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich (Soot-Ryen,
1951), South Georgia (Dell, 1990) and
South Orkney Islands (Carcelles, 1953),
South Atlantic Ocean (51° S, 44° W) and
Falkland /Malvinas Islands (Dell, 1990),
South Shetland Islands (Lamy, 1911a;
Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell, 1990) and
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Lamy,
1906b; Lamy, 1911a; Dell, 1990; this
study), Bellingshausen Sea (Dell, 1990),
Peter I Island (Soot-Ryen, 1951; this
study) and Ross Sea (Smith, 1907b; Dell,
1990); from 15 to 1281 m (Dell, 1990).
Subclass Anomalodesmata Dalí, 1889
Order Pholadomyida Newell, 1965
Family Lyonsiidae Fischer, 1887
Genus Lyonsia Turton, 1822
Lyonsia arcaeformis Martens, 1885 (Fig. 111)
Lyonsia arcaeformis Martens, 1885: 94; Martens and Pfeffer, 1886: 113, pl. 4, fig. 1; Dell, 1964: 226;
Nicol, 1966: 69, pl. 9, figs. 1, 3, 9; Dell, 1972: 27, fig. 28; 1990: 63, figs. 116-117; Hain, 1990: 100,
pl. 15, figs. 6a-b.
Entodesma arcaeformis : Soot-Ryen, 1951: 21.
Lyonsiella planulata Thiele, 1912: 232, pl. 18, figs. 27-27a; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 22; Powell, 1958: 178;
Egorova, 1982: 68, figs. 300-301.
Lyonsia planulata: Nicol, 1966: 69, pl. 9, figs. 1, 3, 9.
Pholadomya mazvsoni Hedley, 1916: 28, pl. 3, figs. 29-30; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 21; Nicol, 1966: 71.
Material studied: 1 spm. (11.1 x 7.0 mm), PA39; 3 spm. (5.2 x 3.6 - 10.9 x 6.0 mm), DEC.
Remarks : Dell (1964) included Pho-
ladomya mawsoni Hedley, 1916 as a
júnior synonym, and Dell (1972)
Lyonsia planulata (Thiele, 1912). Accord-
ing to Powell (1960) the specimen of
Entodesma cuneata (Gray, 1828) from
Falkland /Malvinas Islands reported by
Melvill and Standen (1907, p. 151)
corresponds to L. arcaeformis.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Sandwich (Dell, 1990),
South Georgia (Martens and Pfeffer,
1886; Dell, 1990), South Orkney (Dell,
1990) and probably in the
Falkland /Malvinas Islands (Powell,
1960) and Burdwood Bank (Carcelles,
1953), South Shetland Islands and
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990; this study), Amundsen Sea (70° S,
106° W) (Dell, 1990), Ross Sea (Dell,
1972, 1990), Terre Adélie, Shackleton Ice
Shelf (Hedley, 1916) and Davis Sea
(Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982), Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958) and Bouvet Island
(Linse, 2006); from 12 to 1812 m (Dell,
1990).
Family Poromyidae Dalí, 1886
Genus Poromya Forbes, 1844
Poromya adelaidis (Hedley, 1916) (Fig. 112)
Pholadomya adelaidis Hedley, 1916: 28, pl. 3, figs. 31-32; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 21; Powell, 1958: 178;
Dell, 1964: 227; Egorova, 1982: 67, figs. 294-296.
Poromya adelaidis: Dell, 1990: 61, figs. 107-108.
Poromya cf. adelaides (sic): Hain, 1990: 102, pl. 16, fig. 1.
Material studied: 2 spm. (18.9 x 13.4 - 21.0 x 14.3 mm), PA43; 3 spm. (23.1 x 17.0 - 28.1 x 19.8 mm),
LOW; 1 spm. (22.1 x 17.4 mm), DEC.
105
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Remarles : Dell (1990, p. 61) com-
ments that the relationship between P.
adelaidis, P. spinosula (Thiele, 1912) and P.
antárctica (Hedley, 1916) is still not clear.
Distribution : Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), South Georgia and Falkland/
Malvinas Islands, Cape Horn, South
Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990; this study).
Western Antarctic Peninsula (new
record), Ross Sea (Dell, 1990), Terre
Adélie, Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley,
1916), Davis Sea (Egorova, 1982) and En-
derby Land (Powell, 1958); from 110 m
(Hain, 1990) to 2154 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Laternulidae Fledley, 1918
Genus Laternula Roding 1798
Laternula elliptica (King and Broderip, 1832) (Fig. 113)
Anatina elliptica King and Broderip, 1832: 335; Smith, 1885: 76; Smith, 1902; 210, pl. 25, figs. 9-10;
Lamy, 1906b: 14; Melvill and Standen, 1907: 151; Smith, 1907b: 1, pl. 3, fig. 3; Hedley, 1911: 3;
Lamy, 1911a: 21; Thiele, 1912: 256; Smith, 1915: 78; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 244.
Laternula elliptica: Hedley, 1916: 27; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 22; Powell, 1957: 120; Dell, 1964: 229; Nicol,
1966: 74, pl. 10, figs. 1, 4, 7; Arnaud, 1973: 559; Egorova, 1982: 68, figs. 297-299; Okutani, 1986:
279, pl. 2, figs. 20-21; Dell, 1990: 62, fig. 106; Branch et al, 1991: 51 (key); Numanami et al, 1996:
212 (table, text), pl. 4, fig. 9; Troncoso et al, 2001: 110, fig. 41.
Material studied: 1 spm. (33.0 x 18.0 mm), PI5; 1 spm. (12.0 x 7.3 mm), LOW; 3 spm. (20.5 x 11.5 -
46.0 x 29.1 mm), DEC.
Distribution : Cited for the Weddell
Sea (Griffiths et al ., 2003), South Sand-
wich (Soot-Ryen 1951, Dell 1990),
South Georgia (Carcelles, 1953; Dell,
1990) and South Orkney Islands
(Melvill and Standen, 1907; Dell,
1990), Eastern Antarctic Peninsula (Dell,
1990), South Shetland Islands (Lamy,
1911a; Soot-Ryen 1951; Dell, 1990; this
study). Western Antarctic Peninsula
(Lamy, 1906b, 1911a; Dell, 1990) and
Peter I Island (Soot-Ryen, 1951; this
study), Ross Sea (Smith, 1902, 1907b;
Hedley, 1911; Smith, 1915; Dell, 1990),
Commonwealth (Hedley, 1916), Wilkes
Land (Griffiths et al., 2003), Davis Sea
(Egorova, 1982), Kerguelen Islands
(Smith, 1885; Thiele, 1912; Thiele and
Jaeckel, 1931; Powell, 1957; Troncoso
et AL., 2001), Marión and Prince Edward
Islands (Branch et al., 1991), Syowa
(Numanami et al., 1996) and ca. 10° E
(Griffiths et al., 2003); from 1 m (Tron-
coso et AL., 2001) to 508 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Thraciidae Stoliczka, 1870
Genus Thracia Leach in Blainville, 1824
Thracia meridionalis Smith, 1885 (Fig. 114)
Thracia meridionalis Smith, 1885: 68, pl. 6, figs. 4-4b; Lamy, 1906b: 15; Smith, 1907b: 1; Hedley,
1911: 3; Lamy, 1911a: 22; Smith, 1915: 78; Hedley, 1916: 29; Soot-Ryen, 1951: 21; Powell, 1958:
178; Nicol, 1966: 71, pl. 10, figs. 2, 5; Arnaud, 1973: 559; Egorova, 1982: 69, figs. 304-306;
Okutani, 1986: 279 (table), pl. 2, fig. 15; Dell, 1990: 63, figs. 109-111; Hain, 1990: 101, pl. 15, figs.
7a-b; Branch et al., 1991: 51 (key); Linse, 1997: 61; Troncoso et al., 2001: 112, fig. 42.
Mysella? truncata Thiele, 1912: 230, pl. 18, fig. 18.
Mysella? frígida Thiele, 1912: 231, pl. 18, fig. 19.
Material studied: 3 spm. (5.7 x 4.6 - 8.1 x 6.0 mm), PA21; 2 spm. (22.0 x 16.3 - 23.8 x 18.2 mm), LOW;
20 spm. (2.9 x 2.4 - 23.0 x 19.1 mm), DEC.
106
ALDEA AND TroNCOSO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Remarles: The synonymy of Thiele's
(1912) Mysella? truncata and Mysella?
frígida were accepted in many previous
works (see Dell, 1990).
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Soot-
Ryen, 1951; Hain, 1990), South Sand-
wich (Dell, 1990), South Georgia (Car-
celles, 1953; Dell, 1990) and cited for
the South Orkney Islands (Linse, 1997),
Falkland /Malvinas Islands, South
Atlantic Ocean (54° S, 64° W), Cape
Horn (Dell, 1990) and Beagle Channel
(Linse, 1997), South Shetland Islands
(Lamy, 1911a; Soot-Ryen, 1951; Dell,
1990; this study) and Western Antarctic
Peninsula (Lamy, 1906b, 1911a; Soot-
Ryen, 1951; Dell, 1990; this study), Ross
Sea (Smith, 1907b; Hedley, 1911; Smith,
1915; Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie, Shackle-
ton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916) to Davis
Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova, 1982), Ker-
guelen Islands (Smith, 1885; Troncoso
et al., 2001), Mac Robertson to Enderby
Land (Powell, 1958), Marión and
Prince Edward Islands (Smith, 1885;
Branch et al., 1991), 24° E (Okutani,
1986) and ca. 10° E (Griffiths et al.,
2003); from 4 to 836 m (Dell, 1990).
Family Cuspidariidae Dalí, 1886
Genus Cuspidaria Nardo, 1840
Cuspidaria infelix Thiele, 1912 (Fig. 115)
Cuspidaria infelix Thiele, 1912: 233, pl. 18, fig. 28; Hedley, 1916: 29; Thiele and Jaeckel, 1931: 255; Soot-
Ryen, 1951: 23; Dell, 1964: 230; Nicol, 1966: 78, pl. 9, fig. 6; Egorova, 1982: 74, figs. 334-336; Dell, 1990:
68, figs. 112-114; Hain, 1990: 103, pl. 16, figs. 3a-f; Egorova, 1993: 153, pl. 1, figs. 2-6; Linse, 1997: 62.
Material studied: 1 spm. (broken), MB2; 24 spm. (4.3 x 2.9 - 10.0 x 6.9 mm), PI5; 3 spm. (6.0 x 3.7 -
27.1 x 17.0 mm), PI7; 13 spm. (4.4 x 3.0 - 9.2 x 6.1 mm), PI8; 1 spm. (16.3 x 8.1 mm), MB9; 2 spm. (4.0
x 2.6 - 12.7 x 7.8 mm), PA21; 1 spm. (7.1 x 4.1 mm), PA24; 2 spm. (13.9 x 8.5 - 16.5 x 10.1 mm), MB31;
3 spm. (6.0 x 3.7 - 17.9 x 10.9), MB34; 9 spm. (2.0 x 1.3 - 7.3 x 4.6 mm), MB36.
Remarles: Egorova (1993) studied the
Antarctic species of cuspidariids; in this
sense, C. tenella Smith, 1907, differs in
being a larger, more globose species,
having a posterior rostrum which is nar-
rower and shorter. Cuspidaria smirnovi
Egorova, 1998 differs in having more
marked growth lines and a shorter and
less marked rostrum.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Hain,
1990), cited for the South Georgia and
South Orkney Islands (Linse, 1997),
South Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990),
Western Antarctic Peninsula (Dell, 1990;
this study), Peter I Island (Soot-Ryen,
1951; this study) and Bellingshausen Sea
to off Thurston Island (new records),
Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997), Ross Sea
(Dell, 1990), Terre Adélie (Griffiths et
al., 2003), Shackleton Ice Shelf (Hedley,
1916), Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Egorova,
1982) and Bouvet Island (Thiele and
Jaeckel, 1931; Linse, 2006); from 60 m
(Hain, 1990) to 1426 m (new record).
Cuspidaria mínima (Egorova, 1993) (Fig. 116)
Subcuspidaria mínima Egorova, 1993: 164, pl. 3, figs. 2-3.
Cuspidaria mínima : Zelaya and Ituarte, 2005: 173, figs, 16-27.
Material studied: 1 spm. (3.0 x 2.1 mm), PI5; 4 spm. (1.5 x 1.1 - 1.9 x 1.3 mm), PA42; 2 spm. (1.5 x
1.0 - 2.3 x 1.8 mm), PA43; 1 spm. (3.0 x 2.1 mm), LOW.
Remarles: Zelaya and Ituarte (2006) the characteristic of marked lamellae. In
established the differences between the this sense, the similar species C. kerguele-
Antarctic species of Cuspidaria that share nensis (Smith, 1885) and C. concéntrica
10 7
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Thiele, 1912 differ in having less spaced
lamellae, the dorsal margin of the
rostrum almost concave and a postero-
ventral margin which is more concave
than in C. mínima. Cuspidaria plicata
Thiele, 1912 differs in having no lamel-
lose concentric sculpture.
Distribution : South Orkney
(Egorova, 1993) and South Shetland
Islands (Zelaya and Ituarte, 2005; this
study). Western Antarctic Peninsula,
Peter I Island (new records) and Wilkes
Land (Egorova, 1993); from 115 to 1272
m (new records).
Genus Myonera Dalí and Smith, 1886
Myonera fragilissima (Smith, 1885) (Fig. 117)
Naerafragilissima Smith, 1885: 53, pl. 9, figs. 1-lb.
Cuspidaria fragilissima: Pelseneer, 1903: 28.
Myonera fragilissima: Soot-Ryen, 1951: 23; Branch et al.r 1991: 51 (key).
Material studied: 1 spm. (broken), MB14; 2 spm. (1.4 x 0.8 - 2.9 x 1.8 mm), PI27.
Distribution : Bellingshausen Sea (Pel-
seneer, 1903; this study) to Peter I Island
(new record). Marión (Branch et al., 1991)
and Prince Edward Islands (Smith, 1885),
also in Kerguelen Islands (Carcelles,
1953); from 498 to 1873 m (new records).
Class Scaphopoda Bronn, 1862
Order Dentaluda da Costa, 1776
Family Dentaliidae Gray, 1834
Genus Dentalium Linné, 1758
Dentalium majorinum Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889 (Fig. 118)
Dentalium majorinum Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889: 100, pl. 4, fig. 10; Píate, 1908b: 1; Smith,
1915: 74; Hedley, 1916: 67, pl. 9, figs. 104-105; Dell, 1964: 123; Arnaud, 1973: 554; Linse, 1997:
42; Steiner and Linse, 2000: 17, figs. 3, 8, 10 (radula); Steiner and Kabat, 2004: 593, 596, 612, 613.
Fissidentalium majorinum: Dell, 1990: 72; Osorio and Reid, 2004: 84, fig. 2f.
Dentalium majorinum var. magellanicum Pilsbry and Sharp, 1897: 27, pl. 12, figs. 95-97.
Dentalium magellanicum: Powell, 1958: 207.
Dentalium majorinum var. gaussianum Píate, 1908b: 5, figs. 1-4.
Dentalium shoplandi Jousseaume: Melvill and Standen, 1907: 143; Lamy, 1910a: 324; 1911a: 16 (no
Jousseaume, 1894).
Material studied: 1 spm. (27.9 x 2.8 x 0.8 mm), MB1; 2 spm. (5.0 x 1.1 x 0.8 - 10.7 x 1.9 x 0.8 mm),
MB2; 21 spm. (12.5 x 2.0 x 0.7 - 35.5 x 3.9 x 1.0 mm), PI7; 2 spm. (15.0 x 2.9 x 2.3 - 16.9 x 2.2 x 0.8
mm), PI8; 51 spm. (8.9 x 1.8 x 0.7 - 31.8 x 2.6 x 0.7 mm), MB9; 1 spm. (26.1 x 3.0 x 0.8 mm), MB10; 2
spm. (10.0 x 1.4 x 0.8 - 19.8 x 2.0 x 0.8); MB11; 18 spm. (11.4 x 1.4 x 0.5 - 36.5 x 3.8 x 1.0 mm), MB13;
5 spm. (13.6 x 1.6 x 0.5 - 24.0 x 2.7 x 1.0 mm), MB14; 2 spm. (12.0 x 1.7 x 0.8 - 12.1 x 1.8 x 0.8 mm),
PA19; 1 spm. (16.1 x 3.0 x 1.7 mm), MB26; 1 spm. (16.0 x 3.0 x 1.5 mm), MB30; 2 spm. (7.2 x 1.0 x 0.4
- 12.8 x 1.8 x 0.8 mm), MB31; 1 spm. (23.7 x 3.7 x 1.4 mm), MB32; 1 spm. (20.6 x 2.5 x 0.7 mm), MB33;
2 spm. (5.8 x 1.7 x 1.1 - 7.0 x 1.8 x 1.2 mm), MB34; 4 spm. (8.2 x 3.0 x 2.6 - 12.1 x 1.8 x 0.8 mm), MB35;
27 spm. (13.5 x 1.8 x 0,8 - 25.5 x 2.2 x 0.6 mm), MB36; 4 spm. (9.2 x 1.5 x 0.7 - 15.6 x 3.0 x 1.8 mrp),
MB37; 9 spm. (6.3 x 1.3 x 0.8 - 20.3 x 2.0 x 0,7 mm), MB38; 2 spm. (26.1 x 3.6 x 0.7 - 27.1 x 3.2 x 0.7
mm), PA39.
Remarks: Steiner and Linse (2000) Región and validated the synonyms,
revised the group in the Magellanic including Dentalium majorinum gra-
108
Aldea AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Figure 108. Pseudokellya cardiformis , 4.1 x 4.1 mm, PA21. Figure 109. Cyamiocardium denticula-
tum , 4.3 x 4.2 mm, PI8. Figure 110. Cyamiomactra luminífera, 6.3 x 3.0 mm, PA20. Figure 111.
Lyonsia arcaeformis, 7.1 x 4.2 mm, DEC. Figure 112. Poromya adelaidis, 28.1 x 19.8 mm, LOW.
Figure 113. Laternula elliptica, 33.0 x 18.0 mm, PI5. Figure 114. Thracia meridionalis, 8.1 x 6.0
mm, PA21. Figure 115. Cuspidaria infelix, 12.7 x 7.8 mm, PA21. Figure 116. Cuspidaria mínima,
3.0 x 2.1 mm, PI5. Figure 117. Myonera fragilísima, 2.9 x 1.8 mm, PI27. Figure 118. Dentalium
majorinum, 23.2 x 2.0 x 0.6 mm, MB9. Figure 119. Rhabdus cf. perceptus, 26.0 x 3.9 x 1.3 mm,
MB17. Figure 120. Striopulsellum mínimum, 3.4 x 0.6 x 0.3 mm, PI28. Figure 121. Cadulus
thielei, 4.0 x 0.7 x 0.4 mm, MB33. Figure 122. Siphonodentalium dalli, 14.2 x 2.6 x 1.3 mm, PI7.
Figuras 108-122. Ver los nombres científicos en el rótulo en inglés.
109
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
hamense Odhner, 1931. Steiner and
Kabat (2004) gave a complete list of
synonyms of this species.
Distribution: Weddell Sea (Melvill
and Standen, 1907; Dell, 1990), Falk-
land/Malvinas Islands (Dell, 1990),
Cape Horn (Mabille and Rochebrune,
1889), Beagle Channel (Linse, 1997),
Magellan Strait and Tierra del Fuego
Island (Dell, 1990), reaching the South
Pacific coast (44° S - 45° S, South Chile)
(Osorio and Reíd, 2004), South Shet-
land Islands (Dell, 1990), Western
Antarctic Península (Lamy, 1911a;
Odhner 1931 in Powell, 1960; Dell,
1990; this study), Bellingshausen Sea
(Lamy, 1911a; Dell, 1990; this study) to
off Thurston Island and Peter I Island
(new records), Ross Sea and Balleny
Islands (Dell, 1990), 163° E (Smith,
1915), Terre Adélie to Wilkes Land
(Hedley, 1916; Powell, 1958), Shackle-
ton Ice Shelf (Hedley, 1916; Dell, 1990),
Davis Sea (Plate, 1908b; Powell, 1958)
and from Amery Ice Shelf to Enderby
(Powell, 1958); from 24 m (Dell, 1990)
to 2579 m (Melvill and Standen,
1907).
Family Rhabdidae Chistikov, 1975
Genus Rhabdus Pilsbry and Sharp, 1897
Rhabdus cf. perceptus (Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889) (Fig. 119)
Dentalium perceptum Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889: 99; Dell, 1964: 124; Linse, 1997: 42.
Rhabdus perceptum: Steiner and Linse, 2000: 18, fig. 4, 11, 13 (radula); Osorio and Reid, 2004: 84,
%• 2g-
Rhabdus perceptus: Steiner and Kabat, 2004: 628.
Material studied: 1 sh. (30.1 x 3.7 x 2.1 mm), PI7; 2 spm. (42.5 x 4.5 x 1.0 - 43.2 x 4.7 x 1.1 mm), MB12;
1 spm. and 1 sh. (18.7 x 5.0 x 3.9 - 26.0 x 3.9 x 1.3 mm), MB17; 7 spm. (6.8 x 1.3 x 0.8 - 45.8 x 5.8 x 1.2
mm), MB26; 9 spm. (18.5 x 3.0 x 1.3 - 41.4 x 4.5 x 1
x 1.1 mm), MB32.
Remarks: The individuáis studied in
BENTART expeditions were conferred to
this species, because they are thicker than
that used for the original description and
than those from Steiner and Linse (2000),
also they are out of the distributional range.
.3 mm), MB30; 22 spm. (26.1 x 3.0 x 1.0 - 49.8 x 5.8
Distribution : Cape Horn (Mabille and
Rochebrune, 1889), Beagle Channel
(Linse, 1997), reaching 41° S in the South
Pacific coast (Cárdenas et al., in press);
from 80 to 993 m (Cárdenas et al., in
press).
Order Gadilida Starobogatov, 1974
Family Pulsellidae Scar abino in Boss, 1982
Genus Striopulsellum Scarabino, 1995
Striopulsellum mínimum (Plate, 1908) (Fig. 120)
Siphonodentalium mínimum Plate, 1908b: 4, fig. 5; Dell, 1990: 74.
Striopulsellum mínimum: Steiner and Kabat, 2004: 617.
Material studied: 37 spm. (2.1 x 0.4 x 0.1 - 4.7 x 0.9 x 0.4 mm), PI27; 3 spm. (3.3 x 0.8 x 0.2 - 4.0 x 0.9
x 0.3 mm), PI28; 11 spm. (1.8 x 0.4 x 0,2 - 4.9 x 0.8 x 0.3 mm), MB33; 4 spm. (2.8 x 0.6 x 0.1 - 4.0 x 0.7
x 0.2 mm), MB34; 6 spm. (2.0 x 0.2 x 0.1 - 3.5 x 0.5 x 0.1 mm), MB35; 23 spm. (3.0 x 0.6 x 0.1 - 5.0 x
0.7 x 0.2 mm), MB36; 3 spm. (4.0 x 0.7 x 0.3 - 4.1 x 0.7 x 0.3 mm), MB38.
Distribution: Bellingshausen Sea Sea (Dell, 1990) and Davis Sea (Plate,
and Peter I Island (new records), Ross 1908b), also in New Caledonia (Scara-
110
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
bino 1995 in Steiner and Kabat, m (Scarabino 1995 in Steiner and
2004); from 238 m (Dell, 1990) to 6179 Kabat, 2004).
Family Gadilidae Stoliczka, 1868
Genus Cadulus Philippi, 1844
Cadulus thielei Píate, 1908 (Fig. 121)
Cadulus thielei Píate, 1908b: 3, figs. 6-11; Dell, 1990: 73, figs. 120-121; Steiner and Kabat, 2004: 656.
Material studied: 1 spm. (4.0 x 0.7 x 0.4 mm), MB33; 1 spm. (3.9 x 0.5 x 0.3 mm), PA39.
Distribution : Western Antarctic Penin- Ross Sea (Dell, 1990) and Davis Sea (Plate,
sula and Bellingshausen Sea (new records), 1908b); from 157 to 438 m (new records).
Genus Siphonodentalium Sars, 1859
Siphonodentalium dalli (Pilsbry and Sharp, 1898) (Fig. 122)
Cadulus dalli Pilsbry and Sharp, 1898: 155, pl. 30, figs. 19-23; Plate, 1908b: 4, fig. 12; Powell, 1958: 207.
Siphonodentalium dalli: Steiner and Linse, 2000: 21; Steiner and Kabat, 2004: 581.
Siphonodentalium dalli f. dalli: Steiner and Linse, 2000: 21, figs. 6, 15 (radula).
Cadulus dalli var. antarcticus Odhner, 1931: 5, pl. 1, figs. 5-7, 9, 11, 13-14, pl. 2, figs. 18-21, 24-25.
Cadulus dalli antarcticus: Dell, 1964: 130; Dell, 1990: 73, figs. 118-119.
Siphonodentalium dalli f. antarcticus: Steiner and Linse, 2000: 23, figs. 7, 14, 16 (radula); Steiner and
Kabat, 2004: 563 (synonymy).
Material studied: 12 spm. (7.8 x 1.9 x 0.7 - 20.1 x 3.1 x 1.7 mm), PI5; 52 spm. (4.9 x 1.1 x 0.4 - 16.1 x
2.6 x 1.3 mm), PI6; 1 spm. (14.2 x 2.6 x 1.3 mm), PI7; 5 spm. (11.0 x 2.4 x 1.7 - 18.3 x 3.2 x 2.0 mm),
PA24; 1 spm. (10.0 x 1 .3 x 0.8 mm), MB36.
Remarks : Steiner and Linse (2000)
studied the differences between the sam-
ples from the Beagle Channel (named
Siphonodentalium dalli í. dalli (Pisbry and
Sharp, 1898)) and from Antárctica
(named Siphonodentalium dalli f. antarcti-
cus Odhner, 1931) and they concluded
that in spite of significative differences of
morphometric characters found in statis-
tical tests, more data are necessary in or-
der to consider them as two subspecies.
Distribution: South Pacific Ocean
(51° S, 74° W) (Pilsbry and Sharp,
CONCLUSIONS
A total of 3133 individuáis belonging
to 118 species of molluscs were identi-
fied. Seventy-one of these species are
gastropods with a total of 571 individu-
áis, forty-two species are bivalves with a
1898), Magellan Strait (Plate, 1908b)
and Beagle Channel (Steiner and
Linse, 2000), South Orkney and South
Shetland Islands (Dell, 1990), Western
Antarctic Peninsula (Odhner, 1931;
Dell, 1990; this study), Bellingshausen
Sea (Dell, 1990; this study) and Peter I
Island (new record), Ross Sea, Shack-
leton Ice Shelf and Davis Sea (Dell,
1990), and from the Amery Ice Shelf to
the Enderby Land (Powell, 1958);
from 93 m (Dell, 1990) to 1056 m (new
record).
total of 2200 individuáis and five species
are scaphopods, with a total of 362 indi-
viduáis. Among the gastropods, the
most abundant species were Neobuc-
cinum eatoni with 89 individuáis, fol-
111
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
lowed by Philine alata with 88 individu-
áis. Among bivalves, Genaxinus debilis
with 674 individuáis, followed by
Cyamiocardium denticulatum with 460
individuáis, were the most abundant
species. Among the scaphopods Dental-
ium majorinum accounted for most indi-
viduáis with 159.
Of the total cited species, six new
records are added for the South Shet-
land Islands ( Margarella refulgens, Torellia
insignis, Antarctodomus thielei, Notoficula
bouveti , Limopsis enderbyensis and
Thyasira bongraini), 30 for the Western
Antarctic Peninsula ( Puncturella
spirigera, Margarella refulgens, Cirsonella
extrema, Dickdellia labioflecta, Onoba
gélida, Powellisetia deserta, Torellia
mirabilis, Torellia planispira, Marseniopsis
cónica, Pseudamauropsis anderssoni,
Pseudamauropsis aureolutea, Acirsa antárc-
tica, Hemiaclis incolorata, Melanella antárc-
tica, Cerithiop silla antárctica, Cerithiopsilla
austrina, Trophon coulmanensis coulmanen-
sis, Pareuthria regulus, Prosipho reversus,
Prosipho turritus, Belaturricula gaini,
Conorbela antárctica, Newnesia antárctica,
Yoldiella profundorum, Dacrydium
albidum, Cyclochlamys gaussianus, Mysella
antárctica, Poromya adelaidis, Cuspidaria
mínima and Cadulus thielei), 34 for the
Bellingshausen Sea ( Anatoma euglypta,
Cornisepta antárctica, Antimargarita
smithiana, Calliotropis antárctica, Solariella
antárctica, Liotella endeavourensis, Lepto-
collonia innocens, Onoba gélida,
Pseudamauropsis aureolutea, Palsilunatia
delicatula, Acirsa antárctica, Melanella
antárctica, Trophon drygalskii, Chlanidota
signeyana, Lusitromina abyssorum,
Belaturricula ergata, Conorbela antárctica,
Leucosyrinx parateno ceras, Typhlomangelia
principalis, Acteon antarcticus, Neactaeon-
ina edentula, Yoldiella antárctica, Yoldiella
profundorum, Yoldiella sabrina, Limatula
hodgsoni, Limatula simillima, Cyclopecten
notalis, Cyclopecten pteriola, Cyclocardia
astartoides, Mysella gibbosa, Cyamio-
cardium denticulatum, Cuspidaria infelix,
Striopulsellum mínimum and Cadulus
thielei) and 30 for Peter I Island ( Mar-
garella refulgens, Onoba gélida, Onoba ker-
gueleni, Onoba turqueti, Marseniopsis
mollis, Marseniopsis syowaensis,
Pseudamauropsis anderssoni, Pseudamau-
ropsis aureolutea, Falsilunatia delicatula,
Melanella antárctica, Trophon cuspidari-
oides, Trophon longstaffi, Chlanidota
signeyana, Pareuthria regulus, Prosipho
chordatus, Prosipho hedleyi, Prosipho pelli-
tus, Prosipho pusillus, Typhlodaphne inno-
centia, Neactaeonina edentula, Philine alata,
Yoldiella antárctica, Yoldiella profundorum,
Cyclopecten notalis, Genaxinus debilis,
Cuspidaria mínima, Myonera fragilissima,
Dentalium majorinum, Striopulsellum
mínimum and Siphonodentalium dalli).
On the other hand, new bathymetric
records are given for 44 species ( Anti-
margarita smithiana, Calliotropis pelseneeri,
Solariella antárctica, Tropidomarga biangu-
lata, Liotella endeavourensis, Onoba gélida,
Torellia planispira, Marseniopsis syo-
waensis, Pseudamauropsis aureolutea,
Acirsa antárctica, Hemiaclis incolorata,
Melanella antárctica, Trophon drygalskii,
Trophon echinolamellatus, Lusitromina
abyssorum, Notoficula bouveti, Prosipho
chordatus, Prosipho pellitus, Prosipho pusil-
lus, Prosipho reversus, Belaturricula gaini,
Aforia multispiralis, Typhlodaphne innocen-
tia, Typhlomangelia principalis, Acteon
antarcticus, Nucula austrobenthalis, Yol-
diella antárctica, Yoldiella profundorum,
Yoldiella sabrina, Bathyarca sinuata, Limop-
sis enderbey ensis, Limatula hodgsoni, Li-
matula simillima, Cyclochlamys gaussianus,
Cyclopecten notalis, Cyclopecten pteriola,
Genaxinus debilis, Mysella antárctica,
Cyamiocardium denticulatum, Cuspidaria
infelix, Cuspidaria mínima, Myonera frag-
ilissima, Cadulus thielei and Siphonoden-
talium dalli).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research has been supported by
the Spanish Government through the
Ministry of Education and Science. The
'BENTART' cruises were funded by the
Antarctic Programmes REN2001-
1074/ ANT and GLC2004-01856/ANT,of
the Spanish Government. The officers
and crew of the RV Hespérides and our
colleagues from the BENTART cruises in
2003 and 2006 played a prominent part
in the success of this project.We express
112
Aldea AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
our gratitude to all of them and we
thank Dr. Diego G. Zelaya for his taxo-
nomic orientations in some taxa and
revising the text. We are also grateful to
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, A., 1864. Description of a new genus and
of twelve new species of Mollusca. Proceedings
ofthe Zoological Society ofLondon, 31: 507-509.
Allen, J. A., 2004. The Recent spedes of the gen-
era Limatula and Limea (Bivalvia, Limacea)
present in the Atlantic, with particular ref-
erence to those in deep water. Journal of Nat-
ural History, 38: 2591-2653.
Arnaud, P. M., 1972. Invertébrés marins des XI-
Iéme et XVéme Expéditions Antarctiques
Frangaises en Terre Adélie. 8. Gastéropodes
prosobranches. Tethys, suppl. 4: 105-134.
Arnaud, P. M., 1973. Invertébrés marins des XI-
Iéme et XVéme Expéditions Antarctiques
Frangaises en Terre Adélie. 13. Polypla-
cophores, Scaphopodes et Pélécypodes.
Tethys , 5: 549-560.
Arnaud, P. M., Troncoso, J. S. and Ramos, A.,
2001. Species diversity and assemblages of
macrobenthic Mollusca from the South Shet-
land Islands and Bransfield Strait (Antárctica).
Polar Biology, 24: 105-112.
Beaumont, A. R. and Wei, J. H. C., 1991. Mor-
phological and genetic variation in the
Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Strebel,
1908). Journal ofMolluscan Studies, 57: 443-450.
Branch, M. L., Arnaud, P. M.; Cantera, J. and
Gianakouras, D., 1991. The benthic Mollusca
and Brachiopoda of subantarctic Marión and
Prince Edward Islands: 1) Illustrated keys to
the species. 2) Records of the 1982-1989 Uni-
versity of Cape Town Surveys. South African
Journal of Antarctic Research, 21 (1): 45-64.
Cantera, J. R. and Arnaud, P. M., 1985. Les
gastéropodes prosobranches des íles Ker-
guelen et Crozet (sud de l'Océan Indien):
comparaison écologique et particularités bi-
ologiques. Comité National Frangais des
Recherches Antarctiques, 56: 1-169.
Carcelles, A., 1953. Catálogo de la Malaco-
fauna Antárctica Argentina. Anales del Museo
del Nahuel Huapi, 3: 155-250.
Cárdenas, J., Aldea, C. and Valdovinos, C.,
in press. Chilean marine Mollusca of the
northern Patagonia collected during the
Cimar-10 Fjords cruise. Gay ana.
Castellanos, Z. A., 1988-1992. Catálogo de-
scriptivo de la malacofauna marina magal-
lánica. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas,
Buenos Aires. 1988, Los Placóforos 1: 41 pp.;
1989, Mesogastropoda 4: 44 pp.; 1990, Meso-
gastropoda 5: 38 pp.; 1992a, Neogastropoda
7: 41 pp.; 1992b, Neogastropoda 8: 27 pp.
Leslie Fernández, Cristina Ver tan and to
one anonymous referee for their helpful
comments that improved the manu-
script.
Castellanos, Z. A. and Landoni, N. A., 1988-
1993. Catálogo descriptivo de la malacofauna
marina magallánica. Comisión de Investiga-
ciones Científicas, Buenos Aires. 1988, Archi-
gastropoda 2: 40 pp.; 1989, Archigastropoda
3: 40 pp.; 1990, Mesogastropoda 6: 38 pp.;
1993a, Neogastropoda 9: 26 pp.; 1993b,
Neogastropoda 11: 31 pp.
Castellanos, Z. A., Landoni, N. A. and
Dadon, J. R., 1993. Catálogo descriptivo de
la malacofauna marina magallánica. Comisión
de Investigaciones Científicas, Buenos Aires. 12,
Opistobranchia: 29 + 9 pp.
Cernohorsky, W. O., 1977. The taxonomy of
some Southern Ocean Mollusca (Gas-
tropoda) mainly Antarctic and subantarc-
tic. Records ofthe Auckland Institute and Mu-
seum, 14: 105-119.
Clarke, A., Aronson, R. B., Crame J. A., Gilí,
J. M. and Blake, D. B., 2004. Evolution and
diversity of the benthic fauna of the South-
ern Ocean continental shelf. Antarctic Sci-
ence, 16 (4): 559-568.
Clarke, A., Griffiths, H. J., Linse, K.,
Barnes, D. K. A. and Crame, J. A., 2007.
How well do we know the Antarctic ma-
rine fauna? A preliminary study of macro-
ecological and biogeographic patterns in
Southern Ocean gastropod and bivalve
molluscs. Diversity and Distributions, 13:
620-632.
Cope, T. and Linse, K., 2006. Morphological
differences in Lissarca notorcadensis Melvill
and Standen, 1907 from the Scotia, Wed-
dell and Ross Seas. Deep-Sea Research II, 53:
903-911.
Dell, R. K., 1964. Antarctic and sub- Antarctic
Mollusca: Amphineura, Scaphopoda and Bi-
valvia. Discovery Reports, 33: 99-250.
Dell, R. K., 1972. Notes on nomenclature of
some Mollusca from Antárctica and South-
ern South America. Records ofthe Dominium
Museum, 8 (3): 21-42.
Dell, R. K., 1990. Antarctic Mollusca with spe-
cial reference to the fauna of the Ross Sea. Bul-
letin ofthe Royal Society ofNew Zealand, 27: 1-
311.
Días Passos, F. and Domaneschi, O., 2006. A
new species of My sella Angas, 1877 (Bivalvia:
Galeommatoidea) from Admiralty Bay, King
George Island, South Shetlands, Antárctica,
with data on its biology and functional
anatomy. Polar Biology, 29: 389-398.
113
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Dijkstra, H. H. and Kóhler, F., 2008. An an-
notated catalogue of Recent Pectinoidea (Mol-
lusca, Pectinidae and Propeamussiidae) type
material in the Museum of Natural History,
Humboldt University, Berlín. Z oosystematics
and Evolution, 84 (1): 31-44.
Eales, N. B., 1923. Mollusca: Part 5. Anatomy
of Gastropoda (Except the Nudibranchiata).
British Antarctic "Terra Nova" Expedition, 1910.
Natural History Report. Zoology, 7: 1-46.
Egorova, E. N., 1972. New species of Gas-
tropoda (Prosobranchia) from Davis Sea.
Issledovaniya Fauny Morei, 11 (19): 383-394.
(In Russian).
Egorova, E. N., 1982. Biological results of the
Soviet Antarctic expeditions, 7, Mollusca of
the Davis Sea. Explorations of the Faunas of
the Seas, 26 (34): 1-142. (In Russian).
Egorova, E. N., 1993. Antarctic Cuspidaria (Cus-
pidariidae, Cuspidariida, Bivalvia). Antark-
tika, 32: 151-166. (In Russian).
Egorova E. N., 2007. New data against the
bipolar status of the genus Amauropsis (Nati-
cidae, Mollusca) with a description of the
new genus Pseudamauropsis from Antarctic
Región. Zoologicheskii zhurnal (Russian Jour-
nal of Zoology), 86 (1): 16-29. (In Russian).
Engl, W., 2004a. Antarctic mollusks Part 5. Re-
visión of the Antarctic Eulimidae with the de-
scription of three new species. La Conchiglia,
310:11-18,61.
Engl, W., 2004b. Antarctic mollusks Part 6.
Prosipho enricoi n. sp. La Conchiglia, 311: 11-14.
Giribet, G. and Wheeler, W. C., 2002. On bi-
valve phylogeny: a high-level analysis of the
Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined mor-
phology and DNA sequence data. Inverte-
brate Biology, 121 (4): 271-324.
Griffiths, H. J., Linse, K. and Crame, J. A., 2003.
SOMBASE - Southern Ocean Mollusc Data-
base: A tool for biogeographic analysis in
diversity and ecology. British Antarctic Sur-
vey, Cambridge, UK. http:/ /www. antárc-
tica. ac.uk/BAS_Science / programmes2000-
2005 /ABPPF/ SOMBASE/ (accessed 3 Feb-
ruary 2007)
Hain, S., 1990. Die beschalten benthischen Mol-
lusken (Gastropoda und Bivalvia) des Wed-
dellmeeres, Antarktis. Berichte zur Polar-
forschung, 70: 1-181.
Harasewych, M. G. and Kantor, Y. I., 1999.
A revisión of the Antarctic genus Chlanidota
(Gastropoda: Neogastropoda: Buccinulidae).
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Wash-
ington, 112 (2): 253-302.
Harasewych, M. G. and Kantor, Y. I., 2004.
The deep-sea Buccinoidea (Gastropoda:
Neogastropoda) of the Scotia Sea and adja-
cent abyssal plains and trenches. The Nautilus,
118 (1): 1-42.
Hedley, C., 1911. Mollusca. Reports on the Sci-
entific Investigations ofthe British Antarctic Ex-
pedition 1907-1909, 2, Biology, (1): 1-8.
Hedley, C., 1916. Mollusca. Australian Antarc-
tic Expedition, Ser. C, Zoology and Botany, 4 (1):
1-80.
Hombron, J. B. and Jacquinot, C. R, 1841. De-
scription de quelques Mollusques provenant
de la campagne de 1' Astrolabe et de la Zélée.
Annales des Sciences Naturelles, París, 2 (16): 62-
65, 190-192.
Houart, R. and Sellanes, }., 2006. New data
on recently described Chilean trophonines
(Gastropoda: Muricidae), description of a
new species and notes of their occurrence at
a coid seep site. Zootaxa, 1222: 53-68.
Jay, J. C. 1839. A Catalogue of the Shells,
arranged according to the Lamarckian Sys-
tem: together with descriptions of new or
rare species, contained in the collection of
John C. Jay, M.D. New York, Wiley and Put-
nam, 3rd edition, 126 pp.
Kantor, Y. I. and Harasewych, M. G., 1999.
Rediscovery of the Antarctic species Sipho
gaini Lamy, 1910 (Gastropoda: Neogas-
tropoda) with remarks on its taxonomic po-
sition. Antarctic Science, 11 (4): 430-435.
King, P. P. and Broderip, W. J., 1832. De-
scription of the Cirripedia, Conchífera and
Mollusca, in a collection formed by the offi-
cers of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle em-
ployed between the years 1826 and 1830 in
surveying the Southern coasts of South Amer-
ica. Zoological Journal, 5: 332-349.
Lamy, E., 1905. Gastropodes prosobranches re-
cueillis par l'Expédition Antarctique
Frangaise du Dr. Charcot. Bulletin du Mu-
seum d'Histoire N atur elle, 11: 475-483.
Lamy, E., 1906a. Lamellibranches recueillis par
l'Expédition Antarctique Frangaise du Dr.
Charcot. Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Na-
turelle, 12: 44-52.
Lamy, E., 1906b. Gastropodes Prosobranches et
Pélécypodes. Expédition Antarctique Frangaise
(1903-05), Sciences naturelles, París, 20 pp.
Lamy, E., 1910a. Mission dans 1' Antarctique
dirigée par M. le Dr. Charcot (1908-1910).
Collections recueillies par M. le Dr. J. Liou-
ville. Gastropodes Prosobranches et
Scaphopodes. Bulletin du Muséum National
d'Histoire Naturelle, 16: 318-324.
Lamy, E., 1910b. Mission dans 1' Antarctique
dirigée par M. le Dr. Charcot (1908-1910).
Collections recueillies par M. le Dr. J. Liou-
ville. Pélécypodes. Bulletin du Muséum Na-
tional d'Histoire Naturelle, 16: 388-394. (
Lamy, E., 1911a. Gastropodes Prosobranches,
Scaphopode et Pélécypodes. Deuxiéme Ex-
pédition Antarctique Frangaise (1908-1910), Sci-
ences naturelles, París, 32 pp.
ALDEA AND TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Lamy, E., 1911b. Sur quelques Mollusques de
la Géorgie du Sud et des íles Sandwich du
Sud. Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle,
17: 22-27.
Lehmann, T., Gailer, J. P., Melzer, R. R. and
Schwabe, E., 2007. A scanning-electron mi-
croscopic study of Dickdellia labioflecta (Dell,
1990) (Gastropoda, Littorinoidea) on
Colossendeis megalonyx megalonyx Fry and
Hedgpeth, 1969 (Pycnogonida, Colossendei-
dae): a test for ectoparasitism. Polar Biology ,
30: 243-248.
Linse, K., 1997. Die Verbreitung epibenthis-
cher Mollusken im chilenischen Beagle-Kanal.
Berichte zur Polarforschung, 228: 1-131.
Linse, K., 2002. The shelled magellanic Mol-
lusca: with special reference to biogeographic
relations in the Southern Ocean. Theses Zoo-
logicae, 34: 1-252.
Linse, K., 2006. New records of shelled marine
molluscs at Bouvet Island and preliminary as-
sessment of their biogeographic affinities.
Polar Biology , 29: 120-127.
Linse, K. and Page, T. J., 2003. Evidence of
brooding in Southern Ocean limid bivalves.
Journal ofMolluscan Studies, 69: 290-293.
Linse, K., Griffiths, H. J., Barnes, D. K. A.
and Clarke, A., 2006. Biodiversity and bio-
geography of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic
mollusca. Deep-Sea Research II, 53: 985-1008.
Lus, V. Ya., 1993. New species of Tromina
(Neogastropoda, Buccinulidae, Tromina ) from
low abyssal of Antarctic trenches. Lorie and
Orkney. Proceedings ofthe P.P. Shirshov Insti-
tuteofOceanology, 127: 176-197. (InRussian).
Mabille, J. and Rochebrune, A. T., 1889. (see
Rochebrune, A. T. and Mabille, J., 1889).
Malchus, N. and Warén, A., 2005. Shell and
hinge morphology of juvenile Limopsis (Bi-
valvia: Arcoida) implications for limopsid
evolution. Marine Biology Research, 1: 350-
364.
Martens, E. von, 1878. Einige Conchylien aus
den kalteren Meeresgegenden der südlichen
Eidhalfte. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft natur-
forschender Freunde zu Berlín, 1878: 20-26.
Martens, E. von, 1885. Vorlaufige Mitteilungen
über die Mollusken-Fauna von Süd-Georgien.
Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft naturforschender
Freunde zu Berlín, 1885: 89-94.
Martens, E. von and Pfeffer, G., 1886. Die
Mollusken von Süd-Georgien nach der Aus-
beute der Deutschen Station 1882-83. Jahrbuch
der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstal-
ten, 3: 65-135, 4 pls.
McLean, J. H. and Geiger, D. L., 1998. New
genera and species having the Fissurisepta
shell form, with a generic-level phylogenetic
analysis (Gastropoda: Fissurellidae). Natural
History Museum ofLos Angeles County, Con-
tributions in Science, 475: 1-32.
Melvill, J. C. and Standen, R., 1907. The ma-
rine Mollusca of the Scottish National Antarc-
tic Expedition. Transactions ofthe Roy al Soci-
ety of Edinburgh, 46: 119-157.
Melvill, J. C. and Standen, R., 1912. The ma-
rine Mollusca of the Scottish National Antarc-
tic Expedition. Part II. Being a supplementary
catalogue. Transactions ofthe Royal Society of
Edinburgh, 48: 333-366.
Neville, B., 1997. A Master Index to Species
Ñames in the Family Epitoniidae. Albu-
querque, USA: privately published, 59 pp.
Nicol, D., 1964. A new species of Cyamiomac-
tra (Pelecypoda) from the Ross Sea, Antárc-
tica. The Nautilus, 78 (2): 60-62.
Nicol, D., 1966. Descriptions, ecology and ge-
ographic distribution of some Antarctic pele-
cypods. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 51:
1-102.
Numanami, H., 1996. Taxonomic study on
Antarctic gastropods collected by Japanese
Antarctic research expeditions. Memoirs of
National Institute of Polar Research (E), 39: 1-
244.
Numanami, El. and Okutani, T., 1990a. A new
and two known species of the genus Anatoma
collected by the Icebreaker Shirase from Breid
Bay and Günnerus Bank, Antárctica (Gas-
tropoda: Scissurellidae). Venus, 49 (2): 93-
106.
Numanami, H. and Okutani, T., 1990b. Two
trichotropid gastropods collected by the Ice-
breaker Shirase from Breid Bay, Antárctica,
with proposal of a new subgenus. Proceedings
ofthe NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology, 3: 80-
90.
Numanami, H. and Okutani, T., 1991. Lamel-
lariid gastropods collected by Japanese
Antarctic Research Expedition from near
Syowa Station and Breid Bay, Antárctica.
Proceedings ofthe NIPR Symposium on Polar Bi-
ology, 4: 50-67.
Numanami, EL, Okutani, T., Iwami, T.,
Takeuchi, I., Igarashi, A., Tsuchiya, Y. and
Fukuchi, M., 1996. A record of gastropods
and bivalves collected from East Antárctica
by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedi-
tions in 1992-94. Proceedings ofthe NIPR Sym-
posium on Polar Biology, 9: 207-223.
Odhner, N. EL, 1926. Die Opisthobranchien.
Further Zoological Results ofthe Swedish Antarc-
tic Expedition 1901-1903, 2 (1): 1-100.
Odhner, N. H., 1931. Die Scaphopoden. Further
Zoological Results ofthe Swedish Antarctic Ex-
pedition 1901-1903, 2 (5): 1-8.
Okutani, T., 1986. A note on Antarctic benthic
mollusks collected with a beam-trawl from
Breid Bay by the 25th Japanese Antarctic re-
search expedition. Memoirs ofthe National ln-
stitutefor Polar Research, Tokyo, Special Issue,
40: 277-287.
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Oliver, P. G., 1983. Notoficula Thiele, a neote-
nous genus of eratoid gastropod from Antárc-
tica. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 61: 1-6.
Oliver, P. G. and Picken, G. B., 1984. Proso-
branch gastropods from Signy Island, Antárc-
tica: Buccinacea and Muricacea. Bristish
Antarctic Survey Bulletin, 62: 95-115.
Osorio, C. and Reíd, D. G., 2004. Moluscos
marinos intermareales y submareales entre
la Boca del Guafo y el estero Elefantes, sur de
Chile. Investigaciones Marinas, 32 (2): 71-89.
Page, T. J. and Linse, K., 2002. More evidence
of speciation and dispersal across the Antarc-
tic Polar Front through molecular systemat-
ics of Southern Ocean Limatula (Bivalvia:
Limidae). Polar Biology, 25: 818-826.
Pastorino, G., 2002. Two new Trophoninae
(Gastropoda: Muricidae) from Antarctic wa-
ters. Malacologia, 44 (2): 353-361.
Pastorino, G., 2005. Recent Naticidae (Mol-
lusca: Gastropoda) from the Patagonian
Coast. The Veliger, 47 (4): 225-258.
Pelseneer, P., 1903. Mollusques (Amphineures,
Gastropodes et Lamellibranches). Résultats du
voy age du S.Y. Bélgica en 1897-1898-1899 sous
le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery.
Rapports scientifiques, Zoologie, R14: 85 pp.,
9 pl.
Philippi, R. A., 1845. Diagnosen einiger neuen
Conchylien. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 11:
50-71.
Philippi, R. A., 1868. Conchylia nova potissi-
mum magellanica. Malakozoologische Blatter,
15: 222-226.
PlLSBRY, H. A. AND Sharp, B., 1897-1898.
Scaphopoda. In Tryon, G. W. (Ed.): Manual of
Conchology, Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, 17, 280pp. 1897: 1-144; 1898: 145-
280.
Plate, L., 1908a. Scaphopoden. Résultats du vo-
yage du S.Y. Bélgica en 1897-1898-1899 sous le
commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery.
Rapports scientifiques, Zoologie, R55: 4 pp.
Plate, L., 1908b. Die Scaphopoden. In Drygal-
ski, E. von (Ed.): Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition
(1901-1903), 10: 1-6.
Ponder, W. F., 1983. Rissoaform gastropods
from the Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic: the
Eatoniellidae, Rissoidae, Barleeidae, Cingu-
lopsidae, Orbitestellidae and Rissoellidae
(Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Signy Island, South
Orkney Islands, with a review of the Antarc-
tic and sub-Antarctic (excluding Southern
South America and the New Zealand sub-
Antarctic islands) species. British Antarctic
Survey Scientific Reports, 108: 1-96.
Ponder W. F. and Worsfold, T. M., 1994. A
review of the rissoiform gastropods of South-
western South America (Mollusca, Gas-
tropoda). Contributions in Science (Natural
History Museum ofLos Angeles County), 445:
1-63.
Ponder, W. F. and Lindberg, D. R., 1997. To-
wards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs; an
analysis using morphological characters. Zo-
ological Journal ofthe Linnean Society, 119: 83-
265.
Powell, A. W. B., 1951. Antarctic and Sub-
antarctic Mollusca: Pelecypoda and Gas-
tropoda. Discovery Reports, 26: 47-196.
Powell, A. W. B., 1957. Mollusca of Kerguelen
and Macquarie Islands. B. A. N. Z. Antarctic
Research Expedition, 1929-1931. Reports B, 6:
107-149.
Powell, A. W. B., 1958. Mollusca from the Vic-
toria-Ross Quadrants of Antartica. B. A. N.
Z. Antarctic Research Expedition, 1929-1931.
Reports B, 6: 165-215.
Powell, A. W. B., 1960. Antartic and subantartic
mollusca. Records of the Auckland Institute
Museum, 5 (3-4): 117-193.
Preston, H. B., 1916, Descriptions of eight new
species of marine Mollusca from the South
Shetland Islands. Annals and Magazine of Nat-
ural History, (8) 18: 269-272.
Rabarts, I. W. and Whybrow, S., 1979. A re-
visión of the Antarctic and Subantarctic mem-
bers of the genus Yoldia Moller, 1842 (Bi-
valvia: Nuculanidae). Journal of Natural His-
tory, 13: 161-183.
Reíd, D. G. and Osorio, C., 2000. The shallow-
water marine Mollusca of the Estero Ele-
fantes and Laguna San Rafael, Southern Chile.
Bulletin ofthe Natural History Museum Zool-
ogy, Eondon, 66 (2): 109-146.
Rochebrune, A. T. and Mabille, ]., 1889. Mol-
lusques. Misión Scientifique du Cap Horn. VI,
Zoologie, París, 129 pp.
Rosenberg, G., 2005. Malacolog 4.1: A Database
of Western Atlantic Marine Mollusca. [WWW
database (versión 4.1.0)I. http:/ /www.mala-
colog.org/ (accessed 2 February 2007).
Smith, E. A., 1875. Description of some new
shells from Kerguelen' s Island. Annals and
Magazine of Natural History, (4) 16: 67-73.
Smith, E. A., 1879. Mollusca. An account of the
petrological, botanical and zoological col-
lections made in Kerguelen' s Land and Ro-
dríguez during the transit of the Venus Ex-
peditions carried out by order of her Majesty's
Government in the years 1874-75. Philosoph-
ical Transactions ofthe Roy al Society of Eondon,
168:167-192.
Smith, E. A., 1881. Account of the Zoological col-
lections made during the survey of the H.M.S.
"Alert" in the Straits of Magellan and on the
coast of Patagonia. IV. Mollusca and Mol-
luscoidea. Proceedings ofthe Zoological Society
of Eondon, 1881: 22-44, pls. 3-5.
Smith, E. A., 1885. Report on the Lamelli-
branchiata collected by H.M.S. Challenger
during the years 1873-1876. Reports ofthe Sci-
entific Results ofthe Exploratory Voyage of H.M.S.
Challenger, Zoology, 13 (35): 1-341, 25 pls.
lió
Aldea and TroncosO: Shelled molluscs from West Antárctica
Smith, E. A., 1902. Mollusca. In Lankester, E.
R. and Bell, J. (Eds.): Report on the Collections
of Natural History made in Antarctic Regions
during the voyage ofthe Southern Cross, British
Museum (Natural History), London: 201-213.
Smith, E. A., 1907a. Mollusca. II.-Gastropoda.
In Bell, J. (Ed.): National Antarctic Expedition
1901-1904. Natural History British Museum
(Natural History), London, 2, 12 pp.
Smith, E. A., 1907b. Mollusca. V.-Lamelli-
branchiata. In Bell, J. (Ed.): National Antarc-
tic Expedition 1901-1904. Natural History British
Museum (Natural History), London, 2, 7 pp.
Smith, E. A., 1915. Mollusca. Part I. Gastropoda
Prosobranchia, Scaphopoda, and Pelecypoda.
British Antarctic ("Terra Nova") Expedition,
1910. Natural History Report, Zoology. British
Museum (Natural History), London, 2: 61-112.
Soot-Ryen, T., 1951. Antarctic Pelecypoda. Sci-
entific Results of the Norwegian Antarctic Ex-
pedition (1927-29), 32: 1-46.
Steiner, G. and Linse, K., 2000. Systematics and
distribution of the Scaphopoda (Mollusca) in
the Beagle Channel (Chile). Mitteilungen aus
dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und
Institut, 79: 13-30.
Steiner G. and Kabat, A. R., 2001. Catalogue
of supraspecific taxa of Scaphopoda (Mol-
lusca). Zoosystema, 23 (3): 433-460.
Steiner G. and Kabat, A. R., 2004. Catalog of
species-group ñames of Recent and fossil
Scaphopoda (Mollusca). Zoosystema, 26 (4):
549-726.
Strebel, H., 1906. Beitráge zur Kenntnis der
Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz. IV.
Zoologische jahrhücher, Abteilung für System-
atík, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere, 24: 91-
174, pls. 7-13.
Strebel, H., 1908. Die Gastropoden (mit Aus-
nahme de nackten Opisthobranchier). Wzs-
senschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Süd-
polar-Expedition 1901-1903, 6 (1):1-1 11, 6 pls.
Stuardo, J., 1962. Sobre el género Limposis y la
distribución de L. jousseaumei (Mabille y
Rochebrune, 1889) (Mollusca: Bivalvia).
Gay ana, zoología, 6: 5-11.
Thiele, J., 1912. Die antarktischen Schnecken
und Muscheln. In Drygalski, E. von (Ed.):
Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition (1901-1903), 13:
183-286.
Thiele, J. and Jaeckel, S., 1931. Muscheln der
deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Dt. Tiefsee-Ex-
pedition 1898-1899, 21: 158-268.
Troncoso, N., Van Goethem, J. L. and Tron-
coso, J. S., 2001. Contribution to the marine
molluscan fauna of Kerguelen Islands, South
Indian Ocean. Iberus, 19 (1): 83-114.
Vayssiére, A., 1906. Mollusques. Nudibranches
et Marséniadés. Expédition Antarctique
Frangaise (1903-05), Sciences naturelles, Taris,
51 pp.
Verrill, A. E., 1885. Third catalogue of mollusca
recently added to the fauna of the New Eng-
land. Transactions ofthe Connecticut Academy
ofArts and Sciences, 6: 395-452.
Verrill, A. E., 1897. A study of the family Pec-
tinidae, with a revisión of the genera and
subgenera. Transactions of the Connecticut
Academy ofArts and Sciences, 10: 42-95.
Vicente, N. and Arnaud, P. M., 1974. In-
vertébrés marins des Xlléme et XVéme Ex-
péditions Antarctiques Fran^aises en Terre
Adélie. 12. Gastéropodes Opisthobranches.
Tethys, 5 (4): 531-547.
Warén, A., Arnaud, P. M. and Cantera, J. R.,
1986. Descriptions of two new gastropods
of the Trichotropidae from Kerguelen and
Crozet Islands (South Indian Ocean). The
Veliger, 29 (2): 157-165.
Warén, A. and Hain, S., 1996. Description of
Zerotulidae fam. nov. (Littorinoidea), with
comments on an Antarctic littorinid gastro-
pod. The Veliger, 39: 277-334.
Watson, R. B„ 1882. Mollusca of H.M.S. "Chal-
lenger" Expedition - Part XIV. Journal of the
Linnean Society - Zoology, 16: 372-392.
Watson, R. B„ 1883. Mollusca of H.M.S. "Chal-
lenger" Expedition - Part XVIII. Journal ofthe
Linnean Society - Zoology, 17: 284-293.
Watson, R. B., 1886. Report on the Scaphopoda
and Gasteropoda collected by H.M.S. Chal-
lenger during the years 1873-76. Report on
the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S.
Challenger, 1873-1876, Zoology, 15: 1-756, 50
pls.
Zelaya, D. G., 2004. The genus Margarella
Thiele, 1893 (Gastropoda: Trochidae) in the
southwestern Atlantic Ocean. The Nautilus,
118 (3): 112-120.
Zelaya, D. G., 2005. Systematics and biogeog-
raphy of marine gastropods molluscs from
South Georgia. Spixiana, 28 (2): 109-139.
Zelaya , D. G. and Ituarte, C., 2006. Re-
description of two Antarctic Species of Cus-
pidaria: C. concéntrica Thiele, 1912 and C. mín-
ima (Egorova, 1993) (Bivalvia: Cuspidari-
idae). The Veliger, 48 (3): 170-177.
Zelaya, D. G. and Geiger, D. L., 2007.
Species of Scissurellidae and Anatomidae
from Sub-Antarctic and Antarctic waters
(Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda). Malacologia,
49 (2): 393-443.
117
Iberus, 26 (2): 119-126, 2008
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
A new raphitomine neogastropod from the Mediterranean
Sea (Conoidea)
Una nueva especie de Raphitoma (Conoidea) del mar Mediterráneo
Francesco PUS ATERI* and Riccardo GIANNUZZI-SAVELLI**
Recibido el 14-X-2007. Aceptado el 30-V-2008
ABSTRACT
Raphitoma villoría n. sp. is described from Taormina (Sicily) and ¡s compared with the
closely related R. leufroyi (Michaud, 1828). Differential characters are given for the proto-
conch, the adult shell, and the colour pattern of the living animal. Raphitoma villaria n. sp.
lacks a radula which is present in R. leufroyi. The new species has been confused with R.
errónea (Monterosato, 1 884), which is a different species.
RESUMEN
Se describe Raphitoma villaria n. sp. de Taormina (Sicilia) y se compara con la especie
estrechamente emparentada R. leufroyi (Michaud, 1828). Se indican caracteres diferen-
ciales relativos a la protoconcha y al patrón de color del animal vivo. Raphitoma villana
n. sp. carece de radula, la cual está presente en R. leufroyi. La especie nueva se ha con-
fundido con R. errónea (Monterosato, 1 884), que es una especie distinta.
KEY WORDS: Gastropoda, Mediterrenean Sea, new species, Raphitoma.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Gastropoda, mar Mediterráneo, nueva especie, Raphitoma.
INTRODU CTION
The Mediterranean species of the
subfamily Raphitominae are currently
being revised by Pusateri, Giannuzzi-
Savelli, Spada and Oliverio. Prior to the
main revisión, we present here the
description of a new species that can be
confused (and actually has been) with
Pleurotoma volutella Kiener, 1846.
Kiener (1846: 67) described P. vo-
lutella as recent from Sicily, yet it is
known that sometimes he reported fos-
sil species as living [S. Palazzi, pers.
comm.]. In fact, Pleurotoma volutella is
relatively well known from the Plio-
Pleistocene (Seguenza, 1880; de
* Via Castellana, 64 - 90135 Palermo, Italy.
** Via Mater Dolorosa, 54 - 90146 Palermo, Italy. e
Lamothe and Dautzenberg 1908;
Cerulli-Irelli, 1910; Harmer, 1915; Al-
BERICI AND TAMINI, 1935; COMPAGNONI,
Conato, Follieri and Mal atesta,
1969). No recent specimens have been
found by the authors during the present
revisión, despite the examination of
over 200 lots of raphitomines of the R.
leufroyi (Michaud, 1828) group. All re-
cent records in the literature are either
secondary references derived from
Kiener' s original error (Carus, 1893; Pl-
ani, 1980; Sabelli, Giannuzzi-Savelli,
and Bedulli, 1990) or erroneous identi-
fications of particular morphotypes of
-mail: malakos@tin.it
119
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Raphitoma leufroyi (e.g.: Philippi, 1844;
Aradas and Benoit, 1876; Mon-
terosato, 1878; Priolo 1967). Unfortu-
nately, the types of P. volutella have not
been found, despite search in the De-
lessert collection (Y. Finet, Geneve, pers.
com.), in the MNHN collections, and in
other European museums.
In the Monterosato collection (ZMR)
there are two specimens labelled
"Defrauda volutella, Palermo" and
"Leufroya volutella, fossile di Ficarazzi",
respectively (Figs. 19, 20).
In the Melvill-Tomlin collection
(NMW, 12930) there is a specimen (Fig.
RESULTS
21) labelled by Monterosato "Leufroya
volutella Kiener, fossile di Ficarazzi, non
vivente". A second handwritten label
reads: "Kiener a cru vivant un specimen
ramassé par la mer". All these speci-
mens fit perfectly the original figure by
Kiener, and are congruent with the
usual interpretation of Pleurotoma
volutella, as a fossil.
A recent species, included in the
genus Raphitoma, has possibly been con-
fused in collections under the ñame
Leufroya volutella. It is a different
unnamed species that is herein
described as new.
Raphitoma villana n. sp.
Pleurotoma (Defrauda) volutella sensu Tiberi in schedis non Kiener, 1846 (Swedish Mus. Nat. Hist.
n. 70490)
Leufroya volutella sensu AA. non Kiener, 1846
Raphitoma (Leufroya) errónea sensu Mifsud, 2003 non Monterosato, 1884
? Raphitoma leufroyi sensu Rolán et al., 1998 non Michaud, 1832
Type material: Holotype (MNHN, Paris: Figs. 1-3), height 17.3 mm, width 6.8 mm, from Taormina,
-15 m, bioclastic sediment (A. Villari leg.). Paratype A (Figs 4, 6, 8; MNHN, Paris, C. Mifsud, leg.,
ex Gubbioli collection; height 11.5 mm, width 4.6 mm), from Malta, off Ras il-Wahx, -80/100 m,
muddy sand with Posidonia debris. Paratype B (C. Mifsud coll., Malta; height 14.4 mm, width 5.6
mm), from Malta, off Ras il-Wahx. Paratype C (Fig. 10; Gori coll., Livorno; height 16.9 mm, width
6.5 mm), from Capraia Is., -150 m. Paratype D (Figs 11, 12; F. Pusateri coll., Palermo; height 12 mm,
width 4.8 mm, juvenile), from Bay of Carini (Palermo), coralligenous bottoms. Paratype E (Bini
coll., Cittá di Castello; height 8.6 mm, width 3.9 mm, juvenile), from Antiparos Is. (Cyclades), -
180/250 m. Paratype F (SMNH, Stockholm, n. 70490; ex N. Tiberi, labelled Pleurotoma (Defrauda)
volutella; height 9.3 mm, width 4.7 mm, juvenile), from Sardinia, coralligenous bottom.
Other material examined: 18 shells from Gnejna Bay (Malta), 80/100 m; 5 shells from Qammich
reef (Malta), -80 m; 1 shell from Misurata (Lybia), -60/80 m. (all in the C. Mifsud collection).
Type locality: Taormina, eastern Sicily, -15 m, bioclastic sediment.
Derivatio nominis: After our dear friend Alberto Villari (Villari+A(lberto) = villana) used as a noun
in apposition.
Description: Shell slender, fusiform,
15-18 mm high and 6-7 mm wide.
Protoconch multispiral, of 3.25
whorls. Protoconch I of 1.2, dome
shaped whorls, with a sculpture of 8-9
spiral threads, covered by minute
tubercles; tubercles tending to become
oblong and anastomosing, giving rise to
a somewhat clathrate pattern. Proto-
conch II of slightly more than 2 convex
whorls, with a sculpture of only subsu-
tural axial threads on the adapical third,
tending to curve adaperturally. On the
lower two thirds sculpture of diago-
nally Crossing threads. Sinusigera outer
lip at the protoconch-teleoconch bound-
ary.
Teleoconch of 6-7 whorls, with
stepped spire. Subsutural ramp narrow,
suborizontal, tending to oblitérate aáer
the sixth whorl. Adsutural marks of the
anal sinus visible on the ramp. Axial
sculpture of 15-18 ribs, narrower than
the interspaces, reaching the base.
120
PUSATERI AND Giannuzzi-SavellI: A new raphitomine from the Mediterranean Sea
Figures 1-3. Raphitoma villaria n. sp. Holotype (MNHN, París, h. 17.3 mm, w. 6.8 mm),
Taormina -13 m.
Figuras 1-3. Raphitoma villaria n. sp. Holotipo (MNHN, París, h. 17,3 mm, d. 6,8 mm), Taormina -
15 m.
Spiral sculpture of numerous contin-
uous cordlets, 13-16 above the aperture,
regularly spaced, on the body whorl; 10-
12 strong cords on the siphonal canal.
Aperture suboval, tapering anteri-
orly. Outer lip simple, internally
smooth. Anal sinus as deep as the inter-
space between two axial ribs. Inner lip
smooth, arcuate posteriorly, straigth
medially. Siphonal canal short, open.
Background colour yellowish with a
lighter narrow band on the lower third
of the spire. The spiral cordlets within
this band may be sligthly stronger that
the others.
Animal with a short head and two
short tentacles. Eyes placed on the exter-
nal, thickened basal part of the tentacles,
at about one third of their total height.
Foot narrow and long with two anterior
lateral triangular lobes and a pointed
posterior end. Colour light yellow with
a lighter coloured foot, darker tentacles
and black eyes. Siphon much darker
(nearly orange) in colour. Operculum
absent.
Distribution : Known from the type
locality (Taormina, eastern Sicily) and
from Malta, Bay of Carini (northwestern
Sicily), Capraia Is. (Northern Tyrrhenian
Sea). Rolán, Otero-Schmitt and Fer-
NANDES (1998: 108, figs 26-28) reported a
shell from Angola extremely similar to
the new species. Considering the lack of
additional data on the extra-Mediterra-
nean occurrence of R. villaria n. sp. we
cannot confirm the identity of the
Angolan material. It could represent a
sibling species, or the extreme Southern
range of the new species.
Remarks: The foregut anatomy of a
specimen of this species (under the
ñame "Caenodagreutes errónea") was
examined and described by Don
121
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Figures 4-9. Protoconchs of Raphitoma. 4, 6, 8: villaria n. sp. (paratype A); 5, 7, 9: i?, leufroyi,
specimen from Palermo (coll. Pusateri).
Figurs 4-9. Protoconchas de Raphitoma. 4, 6, 8: R. villaria n. sp. (paratipo A); 5, 7, 9: R. leufroyi,
ejemplar de Palermo (coll. Pusateri).
122
PUSATERI AND Giannuzzi-Savelli: A new raphitomine from the Mediterranean Sea
Figures 10-15. Shellsof Raphitoma. 10: R. villarian. sp. (paratypeC), Capraials., -150 m (coll. Gori,
Livorno, h. 16.9 mm, w. 6.5 mm); 11, 12: R. villaria n. sp. (paratype D), Bay of Carini, Palermo,
(subadult, coll. Pusateri, Palermo, h. 12 mm, w. 4.8 mm); 13: R. concinna, Termini Imerese (Palermo),
muddy sand (coll. Pusateri, Palermo, h. 13.8 mm); 14: R. leufroyi (“var. albescens ”), Palermo, coll.
Monterosato (MZR, Rome); 15: Defrauda errónea Monterosato, 1884. mm 22 x 16, holotype,
handwritten label by Monterosato: “D. volutella Sardegna tipo di errónea ’ (MZR lot n. 16704).
Figuras 10-15. Conchas de Raphitoma. 10: R. villaria n. sp. (paratipo C), Isla de Capraia, -150 m (coll.
Gori, Livorno, h. 16,9 mm, d. 6,5 mm); 11, 12: R. villaria n. sp. (paratipo D), Bahía de Carini, Palermo,
(subadulto, coll. Pusateri, Palermo, h. 12 mm, d. 4,8 mm); 13: R. concinna, Termini Imerese (Palermo),
arena fangosa (coll. Pusateri, Palermo, h. 13,8 mm); 14: R. leufroyi (“var. albescens”), Palermo, coll. Mon-
terosato (MZR, Roma); 15: Defrancia errónea Monterosato, 1884. mm 22 x 16, holotipo, etiqueta man-
uscrita de Monterosato: “D. volutella Sardegna tipo di errónea” (MZR lot n. 16704).
123
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Tippett (in litteris, 2001). The specimen
(15.5 mm long and 6.1 mm wide, proto-
conch tip missing, 1.5 protoconch
whorls remaining, diagonally cancel-
late) originated from Malta, Qummick,
80 m depth (vi. 1988, C. Mifsud leg.).
The specimen lacked a proboscis,
poison apparatus, radula and salivary
glands. The rhynchodaeum was very
retracted and folded, with the posterior
end bearing a tiny circular opening into
the oesophagus.
Pending a phylogenetic assessment
of the Raphitominae, we ascribe the new
species to the genus Raphitoma Bellardi
1848 (type species, by subsequent desig-
nation [Monterosato, 1875]: Pleurotoma
hystrix Cristofori and Jan, 1832).
A group of species with the aperture
internally smooth, without either teeth
or lyrae is commonly included in the
subgenus Leufroya Monterosato, 1884
(type species by tautonymy Pleurotoma
leufroyi Michaud, 1828): Raphitoma
leufroyi (Michaud, 1828), R. concinna
(Scacchi, 1836), R. errónea (Monterosato,
1884), R. linearis (Montagu, 1803), R.
aequalis (Jeffreys, 1867). The new species
belongs clearly in this group, being very
similar to R. leufroyi. Comparing two
mature specimens of each species, the
protoconch is smaller in leufroyi (450 jum
vs 600 jum) and generally brown in
colour (vs. yellowish in villaria). The
subsutural ramp is absent in leufroyi ; the
h/d ratio is higher in villaria (h/d > 2.5
vs < 2.2 in leufroyi ). The spiral cordlets
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank our friends Gian-
luigi Bini, Sandro Gori, Constantin Mifsud,
Alberto Villari who allowed us to study
their collections, and particularly Franco
Gubbioli who generously donated one
paratype. Gianni Sartore and Nando
Ghisotti helped with bibliographic
support. Don Tippett kindly provided his
notes on the anatomy of the new species.
Alberto Palmeri constantly helps us in our
studies. Marco Oliverio, Gianni Spada and
Bruno Sabelli provided useful hints on
previous versions of this ms.
(16 in villaria vs 12 in leufroyi ) are all of
the same size in villaria vs. of altérnate
size in leufroyi. The outer lip is thickened
in leufroyi vs. simple in villaria.
The background colour is lighter
with brownish spots in leufroyi and uni-
formly yellowish in villaria. The animal
of leufroyi is puré white, with light blue
blurs on the end of the foot. The eyes are
larger in leufroyi and are placed halfway
up the tentacles. The foot is wider in
leufroyi. The radula is present in leufroyi
and absent in villaria. Even in some
occasional ligthly coloured specimens of
leufroyi the remaining differences hold
diagnostic.
This species has been confused in
several collections with R. errónea (Mon-
terosato, 1884), which is completely dif-
ferent, having more numerous spiral
cordlets, a shorter siphonal canal, a
more rounded aperture, and a h/d ratio
of 1.25 (vs. 2.5 in villaria).
R. volutella (see figs 18-21) has a
more stepped outline, and a longer
siphonal canal, axial and spiral sculp-
ture are stronger.
R. concinna is smaller (<15 mm), and
the axial ribs are always < 14 (vs. 15 in
villaria). The axial interspaces and ribs
are of equal size (interspaces wider in
villaria). R. villaria has more numerous
and weaker spiral cordlets , and lacks
the typical brown cordlets of concinna.
Finally, the protoconch of R. concinna is
violet while it is always yellowish in vil-
laria.
Philippe Bouchet, Virginie Heros
and Pierre Lozouet (MNF1N, Paris)
kindly assisted during our visits to the
"Labo". Claudio Manicastri (ZMR,
Rome) allowed examination of the
material in the Monterosato Collection.
Anders Warén (SMNH, Stockholm) and
Harriet Wood (National Museum of
Wales) provided useful material for
study, and Yves Finet (MHNG, Geneve)
for information on Kiener types.
C. Mifsud provided the data on the
living animáis of R. villaria n. sp. and R.
124
Pus ATERI AND Giannuzzi-SavellI: A new raphitomine from the Mediterranean Sea
/
Z
j. Picar : volulclle.
/ Pleur: voliUetta , l'a/wu.)
Figures 16-21. Shells of Raphitoma villaria n.sp. and Pleurotoma volutella. 16, 17: Original figure
of Pleurotoma volutella (after Kiener, 1846, photo courtesy Virginie Heros, MNHN Paris); 18:
Raphitoma villaria n. sp., paratype A, off Ras il-Wahx, Malta, (ex Gubbioli collection), h 1 1.5 mm,
d 4.6 mm; 19, 20: P. volutella , Palermo (Coll. Monterosato, MZR, Rome, lote n. 16704, “ Defrau-
da volutella ’); 21: P. volutella, Ficarazzi, coll. Melvill-Tomlin (NMW, 12930) with Monterosato’s
handwritten label [“ Leufroyia volutella Kiener”, fossile di Ficarazzi, non vivente]. A second hand-
written label (also by Monts.) reads: “Kiener a cru vivant un specimen ramassé par la mer”.
Figuras 16-21. Conchas de Raphitoma villaria n.sp. y Raphitoma volutella. 16, 17: Figura original de
Pleurotoma volutella (reproducido de Kiener, 1846, fotografía de Virginie Heros, MNHN Paris); 18:
Raphitoma villaria n. sp., paratipo A, frente a Ras il-Wahx, Malta, (colección Gubbioli), h 1 1,5 mm,
d 4,6 mm; 19, 20: P. volutella, Palermo (Coll. Monterosato, MZR, Roma, lote n° 16704, “ Defrau-
da volutella ”); 21: P. volutella, Ficarazzi, coll. Melvill-Tomlin (NMW, 12930) con etiqueta manus-
crita de Monterosato [“ Leufroyia volutella Kiener”, fossile di Ficarazzi, non vivente]. Una segunda eti-
queta manuscrita (también de Monts.) reza: “Kiener a cru vivant un specimen ramassé par la mer”.
125
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
leufroyi, while Javier López sent a
picture of the animal of L. leufroyi. SEM
photographs were taken by Anna Maria
Mannino and Francesco Furnari (Dipar-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alberici, E. and Tamin, Ev 1935. Contributo
alio studio dei molluschi del Quaternario
marino di Rodi (Egeo). Rendiconti Reale Isti-
tuto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, serie 2, 68:
213-228, pl. 3.
Aradas, A. and Benoit, L., 1872-1876.
Conchigliologia vivente marina della Sicilia
e delle isole che la circondano. Atti dell'Ac-
cademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali, (3) 6: 1-113
+ pl. 1-2 [1872]; 113-226 + pl. 3-4 [1874]; 227-
324 + pl. 5 [1876]
Carus, J. V., 1893. Prodromus faunae Mediter-
raneae sive descriptio animalium Maris Mediter-
ranei incolarum quam comparata silva rerum
quatenus innotuit adiectis locis et nominibus
vulgaribus. Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart'sche.
Vol. II. Brachiostomata. Mollusca. Tunicata.
Vertebrata. ix + 854 pp.
Cerulli-Irelli, S., 1910. Fauna Malacologica
Mariana Parte Quarta. Scaphopoda:-Dental-
idae. Gastropoda:-Stenogyridae, Gadiuiidae,
Acteonidae, Tortnatinidae, Scaphandridae,
Bullidae, Ringiculidae, Philinidae, Umbrel-
lidae, Conidae, Pleurotomidae. Palaeon-
tographia Itálica 16:23-70, pls. 3(34)-6(37).
Compagnoni, B., Conato, V., Follieri, M.,
Malatesta, A., 1969. II Quaternario di Scalea.
Quaternaria 10, 95-123, Roma
de Lamothe and Dautzenberg, P., 1908. Cat-
alogue des Mollusques qu'ils renferment.
Pp. 488-501 in de Lamothe. Les Gites fossil-
iféres des mames plaisanciennes du Sahel
d'Alger. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de
France, série 4, 7:481-505. [In this paper de
Lamothe is listed as "Le Général de
Lamothe".]
FIarmer, F. W., 1915. The Pliocene Mollusca of
Great Britain being supplementary to S. V.
Wood's Monograph of the Crag Mollusca.
Part II. Monograph of the Palaeontological So-
ciety ofLondon 68:201-302, pls. 25-32. [Pyrah,
1978, listed Harmer's specimens preserved
in the Yorkshire Museum.]
Kiener, L. C., 1846. Genre Pleurotome. ( Pleu -
rotoma, Lam.) Spécies général et iconographie des
coquilles vivantes comprenant la collection du
Muséum d'Histoire naturelle de París, collection
Lamarck, celle du Prince Masséna et les décou-
verts récente des voyageurs. París, Rousseau. 84
pp., 27 pls.
timento di Scienze Botaniche, Univer-
sity of Palermo). Digitalization of
images was by Floriana Giannuzzi-
Savelli.
Michaud, A. L. G., 1829. Description de
plusieurs espéces nouvelles de coquilles vi-
vantes. Bulletin d'Histoire Naturelle de la Société
Linnéenne de Bordeaux 3: 260-275, 24 figs.
Mifsud, C., 2003. Note su alcuni molluschi
viventi da Malta. La Conchiglia 307: 39-46.
Monterosato, M. di, 1878. Enumerazione e
sinonimia delle conchiglie mediterranee.
Giornale Scienze Naturali ed Economiche,
Palermo 13:61-115.
Monterosato, M. di, 1884. Nomenclatura genér-
ica e specifica di alcune conchiglie mediterranee.
Palermo: Virzi. 152 pp.
Philippi, R. A., 1844. Enumeratio Molluscorum Si-
ciliae cum viventium tum in tellure tertiaria fos-
silium quae in itinere suo observavit auctor. Vol-
umen secundum continens addenda et emen-
danda, nec non comparationem faunae recentis
siciliae cum faunis aliarum terrarum et cum
fauna periodi tertiariae. Halis Saxonum, E. An-
tón. iv + 303 pp., pls. 13-28.
Plañí, P., 1980. Catalogo dei molluschi conchiferi
viventi nel Mediterráneo. Bollettino della Mala-
cologico 16 (5/6):113-224.
Priolo, O., 1967. Nuova revisione delle
Conchiglie marine di Sicilia. Memoria XVIII.
Atti dell' Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali
di Catania , (6)19: 667-714, pls. 1-3.
Rolán, E., Otero-Schmitt, J. and Fernandes,
F., 1998. The family Turridae s.l. (Mollusca,
Gastropoda) in Angola (West Africa), 1. Sub-
family Daphnellinae. Iberus, 16 (1): 95-118.
Sabelli, B., Giannuzzi-Savelli, R. and
Bedulli, D., 1990. Catalogo annotato dei Mol-
luschi marini del Mediterráneo. Bologna, Edi-
zioni Librería Naturalistica Bolognese. Vol.
1: xiv + 348 pp. [Title also given in English
" Annotated check-list of Mediterranean marine
mollusks".]
Scacchi, A., 1836. Catalogus conchyliorum regni
Neapolitani quae usque adhuc reperit. Napoli, Fi-
liatre Sebetii. 18 pp., 1 pl.
Seguenza, G., 1880. Le formazioni terziarie
nella provincia di Reggio (Calabria). Memo-
ríe della Classe di Scienze Fisiche Matematiche e
Naturali della Regia Accademia del Lincei, serie
3, 6: 1-445, 17 pls.
126
© Sociedad Española de Malacologta
Iberus, 26 (2): 127-131, 2008
New data on the morphology and distribution of
Euglandina obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1844) Gastropoda: Spiraxidae)
a Nicaraguan endemism
Nuevos datos sobre la morfología y la distribución de Euglandina
obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1844) (Gastropoda: Spiraxidae) un endemismo de
Nicaragua
Mijail A. PÉREZ*, Kepa ALTONAGA** and Adolfo LÓPEZ***
Recibido el 24-IV-2008. Aceptado el 25-VI-2008
ABSTRACT
Aspects related to the morphology and distribution of Euglandina obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1 844) a
Nicaraguan endemism are presented. Regarding morphology, a complete redescription of
the shell and the first description of the genital system are included. The number of records
has been increased, from one, the type locality, to 16. Current data have allowed us to
draw a distribution map of the species in Nicaragua.
RESUMEN
Se presentan aspectos relacionados con la morfología y la distribución de Euglandina
obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1844) un endemismo de Nicaragua. En relación con la morfología, se
presenta una redescripción de la concha y la primera descripción del aparato genital. El
número de registros de la especie en el país ha sido incrementada de una a ló localida-
des. Las cifras anteriores nos han permitido elaborar un mapa preliminar de distribución
para la especie en Nicaragua.
KEY WORDS: New data, Euglandina obtusa , Gastropoda, Spiraxidae, Nicaragua, Endemism.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Nuevos datos, Euglandina obtusa, Gastropoda, Spiraxidae, Nicaragua, Endemismo.
INTRODUCTION
According to Pilsbry (1908), Pilsbry
and Vanatta (1936), Baker (1945) and
Thompson (1995), the genus Euglandina
Fischer and Crosse, 1870 contains 92
species along its distribution range.
According to Zilch (1959-60), the distri-
bution of this genus ranges from South-
ern North America to northern South
America, including Central America.
In the Nicaraguan Pacific Slope the
genus Euglandina is represented by two
species: Euglandina cumingii (Beck, 1837)
and Euglandina obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1844). E.
obtusa is a species endemic to
Nicaragua, only known to date from the
type locality. Realejo, in the department
of Chinadega (UTM 16PDU8286); the
only information existing about this
* Asociación Gaia, Colonia 10 de Junio, B-501, Managua, Nicaragua.
** Departamento de Zoología y Dinámica Celular Animal, Universidad del País Vasco/ Euskal Herriko
Unbertsitatea, Bilbo, España.
*** Centro de Malacología y Diversidad Animal, Universidad Centroamericana, Managua, Nicaragua.
127
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Figure 1. Euglandina obtusa. Shell morphology. Cayanlipe, Chínandega, 97:84 (D 11,26 mm, Alt.
27.15 mm). Figure 2. Genital system. Cayanlipe, Chinandega, 97:84 (e= 1 mm).
Figure 1. Euglandina obtusa. Morfología de la concha. Cayanlipe, Chinandega, 97:84 (D 11.26 mm,
Alt. 27.15 mm). Figura 2. Aparato reproductor. Cayanlipe, Chinandega, 97:84 (e- 1 mm).
taxon so far was a brief description of
the shell (Pérez, 1999).
The citations for this species in the
XIX century literature can be summa-
rized as follows:
Glandina obtusa Pfeiffer, 1844, in
Philippi (1842-1845), p. 132, pl. 1 fig. 3.
Achatina obtusa: Reeve (1849 in 1848-
1850), Monograph of the genus
Achatina pl. 15, species 62.
Achatina obtusa: Deshayes (1850) in
Férussac and Deshayes (1819-1851), p.
173, pl. 134 figs. 3, 4.
Oleacina obtusa: Tryon (1885), p. 24,
pl. 4 fig. 55
Glandina obtusa: Martens (1891 in
1890-1901), pp. 76-77.
Euglandina obtusa: Pilsbry (1908 in
1907-1908), p. 204.
In this paper we present new data
on distribution and morphology for E.
obtusa. Fifteen new localities are added
to the one previously known. Data on
shell biometry and the first description
of the genital system is also given.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Source of data: Data presented in this
paper have been taken from Pérez
(1999); this work has been based on
gathering, comparison and synthesis of
information from two main sources: In
the first place, data obtained from revi-
sión of bibliography regarding land and
freshwater snail species present in
Nicaragua and Central America and,
secondly, field data obtained from four
major sampling campaigns.
Samplings: Sampling campaigns
were carried out as follows: 1) Decém-
ber 1994 to March, 1995, 2) August-Sep-
tember, 1996, 3) September-December,
1997 and, 4) July-October, 1998. Field-
work was done as one-day trips, collect-
128
PÉREZ ET AL.: Morphology and distribution of Euglandina obtusa
Table I. Euglandina obtusa. Dimensions. X: Average, DS: Standard Deviation.
Tabla I. Euglandina obtusa. Dimensiones. X: Promedio, DS: Desviación estándar.
ing at various points each day. A
mínimum of one point per 10 x 10 km
quadrant was sampled, and a máximum
of three points. The quantity of points
was determined by the punctual species
richness; if it was low (below three
species) we sampled another point
within the same quadrant. There were
four persons collecting for an hour at
each sampling point.
Collection and conservation of material:
Material was hand-collected, kept in
plástic boxes and labeled for taking to
the lab. Living specimens were relaxed
in water with menthol crystals for 24
hours and then stored in 70° alcohol.
Once fixed, material was separated,
identified and definitively stored in
glass vials within glass jars with 70°
alcohol, in the case of live-taken speci-
mens, or in glass vials within cardboard
boxes, in the case of empty shells.
Abbreviatures : The following abbrevi-
ations have been used: B.C.A.: Biología
Centrali Americana, Carr.: Road, e:
scale, p./ pp.: page/ s, s.l.p.c.: without
an exact locality consigned, RAAN:
Región Autónoma del Atlántico Norte,
RAAS: Región Autónoma del Atlántico
Sur, UCA: Universidad Centroameri-
cana.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Description: Shell cylindrical-fusiform,
opaque, solid, glossy (Fig. 1). Spire repre-
sents a little less than 1/3 of total shell
129
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Figure 3. Euglandina obtusa. Distribution in Nicaragua, in UTM notation of 30 x 50 km and with
mention of the type locality (El Realejo).
Figura 3. Euglandina obtusa. Distribución en Nicaragua, en notación UTM de 50 x 50 km de lado
con mención de la localidad tipo (El Realejo).
length. Colour brown. Sculpture of fine
radial folds. Suture slightly marked.
Apex obtuse. Whorls 6, moderately
convex. Base imperf orate. Aperture long
and ovate, placed laterally regarding the
shell axis; it represents approximately
1 / 3 of the body whorl height. Peristome
simple and not reflexed. Columella
curved and truncated, somewhat thick-
ened. Protoconch of a white to corneous
colour, smooth, whorls 1.5.
Dimensions : Alt. 27.15 mm, D. 11. 26
mm (see Table I).
Genital apparatus with a long
brawny penis (Fig. 2); retractor muscle
wide and short; vas deferens attached to
the penis and to the vagina by conjun-
tive stripes. Vagina short in relation to
the penis and as wide as its proximal
part. Bursa copulatrix rather small and
club-shaped, duct long and thin.
Remarks: Martens (1891 in 1890-
1901) pointed out that though descrip-
tions and pictures all cite Realejo (also
written as Real Llejos) as the locality in
which the species was collected, they
referred to two different forms,
showing differences in size and shape.
The smallest one measures between 16
and 19 mm in height and more or less
half the width; it was first described by
Pfeiffer (1844) in Phillippi (1842-1851),
and is the one represented in Pfeiffer 's
collection; according to Martens
(1891), this is the form which he
studied. The larger form, measuring 26
to 28 mm and being half as wide as
high, is the one depicted by Reeve
(1849) and Deshayes (1850) in Férussac
and Deshayes (1819-1851); this form
resembles very much in its dimensions
Euglandina largillierti Pilsbry, 1891, from
Guatemala and Yucatán, but seems to
be smoother and brighter.
Tryon (1885) recognized only the
dimensions of the larger form (26-28
mm), as relevant to E. obtusa. Later,
Pilsbry (1908 in 1907-1908), referred to
Tryon 's (1885) description and added
that this species seems to link the group
of the smooth Central American forms
to usual Euglandina.
Our material agrees which what
would be the larger "form" mentioned
by Martens (1891), although with
slightly smaller dimensions. Its smooth
and lustrous shell sculpture makes the
Identification of this species very clear.
130
PÉREZ ET AL.: Morphology and distribution of Euglandina obtusa
The genital system of this species is
described for the first time in this paper,
and as this taxon was known previously
only from the type locality, all distribu-
tion data given in this paper are new
and expand considerably its distribution
range.
Distribution: This species was previ-
ously cited only from the type locality,
but we have added 15 new localities to
the one cited in the literature (Fig. 3,
Table II). New localities are distributed
in two departments (= provinces) (Dpt.
of Chinandega and Dept. of León) of
northwestern Nicaragua, both within the
Nicaraguan Pacific Slope, which sug-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baker, H. B., 1943. The mainland genera of
american Oleacininae. Proceedings ofthe Aca-
demy of Natural Sciences ofPhilaladelphia, 95:1-
14, L. 1-3.
Férussac, A. E. J. d'A. and Deshayes, G. P.,
1819-1951. Histoire naturelle générale et parti-
culiére des mollusques terrestres et fluviátiles.
París (3 vols.).
Férussac, A. E. J. d'Audebard de, 1819-1832
[continued by Deshayes, G.P. 1839-1851],
Histoire naturelle générale et particuliére des
Mollusques terrestres et fluviátiles. Tome 1: viii
+ 184 pp.; Tome 2 (1): 402 pp.; 2 (2): 260 + 22
+ 16 pp.; Atlas 1: 70 pl.; Atlas 2: 166 + 5 pl.
París, J.-B. Bailliere.
Martens, E. v., 1890-1901. Biología Centrali-
Americana. Mollusca. 1-706. British Museum
(Natural History).[pp. 41-96 issued 189] (on-
line edition available from Smithsonian Ins-
titution atchttp:/ / www.sil.si.edu / Digital-
Collections / bca / navigation / bca_06_00_00 /
bca_06_00_00select.cfm>)
Pérez, A. M., 1999. Estudio taxonómico and bio-
geográfico preliminar de la malacofauna conti-
nental (Mollusca: Gastropoda) del Pacífico de
Nicaragua. Tesis Doctoral inédita. Universi-
dad del País Vasco, España. 524 p.
Phillippi, R. A., 1842-1845. Abbildungen und
Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig gekannter
Conchylien unter mithufte meherer deutscher
Conchyliologen. Vol. 1 Cassel, T. Fischer, vol.
1: 1-20 [1842] 21-76 [1843] 77-186 [1844] 187-
204 [1845],
gests a very restricted distribution range.
This may be confirmed also by the fact
that it has not been collected so far else-
where in the country over the years.
Along its distribution range E.
obtusa was collected on road edges, in
dry forests ranging from savannah
forests with abundant shrubs to low-
medium semideciduous secondary
forests. Soil was covered by abundant
leaf litter, with or without sand and wet,
and illumination was of filtered sun and
shade.
It should also be pointed out that E.
obtusa is a rare species, since lots col-
lected consist only of 1 to 14 specimens.
Pilsbry, H. A., 1907-1908. Manual of Conchology .
2nd Series, vol. 19, 366 p, 52 pl [pp. 1-192, pl.
1-30 issued 1907; 193-366, pl. 31-52 issued
1908]. Published by the Department of Con-
chology, Academy of Natural Science,
Philadelphia.
Pilsbry, H. A., and Vanatta, E. G., 1936. Three
Mexican Euglandinas. The Nautilus, 49 (3):97-
98.
Reeve, L. A., 1848-1850. Conchologia Iconica: or,
illustrations of the shells of molluscous animáis.
Volume V. Containing the monographs of the
genera Bulimus. Achatina. Dolium. Cassis.
Turritella. Mesalia. Eglisia. Cassidaria. Onis-
cia. Ebumia. Reeve, Benham and Reeve, Lon-
don.
Thompson, F. G., 1995. New and little known
land snails of the family Spiraxidae from
Central America and México (Gastropoda:
Pulmonata). Bulletin ofthe Florida Museum of
Natural History, 39 (2):45-89.
Tryon, G., 1885. Manual of Conchology. 2nd Se-
ries, vol. 1. 364 p, 60 pl. Philadelphia, pub-
lished by the author.
Zilch, A., 1959-60. Gastropoda: Euthyneura. In
Schindewolf, O.H. (Ed): Handbuch der Palae-
ozoologie. Berlín, VI (2), 834 p.
131
'
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
2008
Las especies del género Chauvetia (Gastropoda,
Neogastropoda) del área de Dakar, Senegal, Africa occiden-
tal, con la descripción de diez especies nuevas
The species of the genus Chauvetia (Gastropoda, Neogastropoda)
from the Dakar area, Senegal, West Africa, with the description of
ten new species
Joan Daniel OLIVER* y Emilio ROLÁN**
Recibido el 6-V-2008. Aceptado el 24-IX-2008
RESUMEN
Se revisa el género Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884 en el área de Dakar, Senegal. En total
se encontraron 1 4 especies de las que 4 se asignaron a taxones previamente conocidos.
Las 10 restantes son especies nuevas para la ciencia que se describen en el presente tra-
bajo. Se muestran fotografías de la concha y detalles de la protoconcha y escultura al
Microscopio Electrónico de Barrido.
ABSTRACT
The genus Chauvetia Monterosato, 1 884 ¡n the area of Dakar, Senegal, is revised. In total
14 species were collected, 4 of which were assigned to previously known taxa. The other
ten are new species for Science which are described in the present work. Photographs of
the shells are presented and details of the protoconchs and sculpture are shown with Scan-
ning Electron Microscope
PALABRAS CLAVE: Buccinidae, Chauvetia , protoconcha, microscultura, especies nuevas, Dakar, Senegal.
KEY WORDS: Buccinidae, Chauvetia, protoconch, microsculpture, new species, Dakar, Senegal.
INTRODUCCIÓN
El género Chauvetia Monterosato,
1884 está formado por un grupo bas-
tante numeroso de especies que se
encuentran distribuidas por el Medite-
rráneo y el Atlántico sureuropeo y nor-
teafricano hasta Senegal, estando
también presentes en una parte de los
archipiélagos de la Macaronesia. Existen
muchos taxones, aunque un cierto
número de ellos han sido descritos a
nivel de simple variedad.
La mayor parte de las especies que
hoy se incluyen en Chauvetia han sido
descritas en trabajos referidos a una
determinada zona o área y están bas-
tante dispersos en la literatura malacoló-
gica. Nordsieck (1976) realizó una
primera revisión del género, que fue de
nuevo repetida más recientemente por
Micali (1999), aunque refiriéndose fun-
damentalmente a las especies del Medi-
terráneo.
* Alcorisa, 83-12C, E-28043 Madrid.
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela.
133
Iberas, 26 (2), 2008
Hay muy poca información sobre
algunas particularidades de este género,
como sobre su rádula, que sólo ha sido
representada por Bandel (1977, lám. 3,
fig. 4), Thiele (1929, fig. 357) y Her-
GUETA, LUQUE Y TEMPLADO (2002, figS. 9,
10). Luque (1984) comenta que los datos
sobre las rádulas que se conocen de
especies de este género indican que, por
su similitud, puede no tener importan-
cia en la separación de especies. Hay
también muy pocos datos sobre su opér-
culo.
Pocos trabajos existen sobre las
especies africanas de este género. Bru-
guiére (1789) describe la primera
especie de la costa africana, dando un
nombre disponible a una de las dos
especies citadas por Ad anson (1757) en
Dakar; Monterosato (1889) describe
una nueva especie para Marruecos y el
Mediterráneo. Dautzenberg (1891) lo
hace con otra especie para Senegal, que
presenta como variedad de un taxon ya
conocido y, posteriormente (Dautzen-
berg, 1910, 1912), menciona varias
especies para la costa africana. Fischer-
Piette (1942) y Fischer-Piette y
Nicklés (1946) comentan algunos
taxones de Dakar y Chauvetia mínima
var. affinis Monterosato, que también
citan en Dakar, y Nicklés (1947)
también cita 3 especies de esta misma
área. Nicklés (1950) muestra dibujos de
dos de estas especies y Knudsen (1956)
describe otra especie más para la costa
occidental de África.
El presente trabajo pretende revisar
el género en el área de Dakar, Senegal,
aunque material de otras zonas, como
Mauritania o el Mediterráneo, ha sido
estudiado como comparación.
Otros trabajos centrados sobre este
grupo en algunos archipiélagos de la
Macaronesia están actualmente en
curso.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
El material ha sido recolectado por el
segundo autor en varios viajes a Senegal
y se ha visto complementado de forma
muy importante por el recogido por
otros malacólogos, como Jacques
Pelorce, José María Hernández y Franck
Boyer, y también por el existente en el
MNHN, principalmente colectado por
Igor Marche-Marchad en la década de
1950. La recolección se ha efectuado
directamente sobre los sedimentos en la
arena del intermareal, con snorkel hasta
los primeros 10 metros de profundidad
y con tanques de aire comprimido,
mediante cepillado de piedras, entre 15
y 40 m. También se hicieron algunos
dragados entre 20 y 30 m.
Después de la recolección, el mate-
rial fue examinado con lupa para la
observación, en los animales vivientes,
de la coloración de las partes blandas.
Posteriormente, una parte del mismo se
conservó en alcohol.
La protoconcha de las especies de
Chauvetia tiene una gran importancia en
su diferenciación, ya que siendo paucis-
piral, sus caracteres no están influencia-
dos por el medio; además, se ha com-
probado la constancia de los mismos en
el examen de numerosos ejemplares de
las distintas poblaciones y especies. Por
este motivo, hemos tomado determina-
das mediciones que se muestran en la
Figura 1: diámetro de la protoconcha;
diámetro del núcleo; diámetro de la
primera media vuelta; altura de la pro-
toconcha. Independientemente, se han
estudiado el número de cordoncillos
espirales, su microescultura, la relación
con sus interespacios, la existencia de
costillas axiales, su número, su forma, y
su posición.
Abreviaturas
AMNH American Museum of Natural
History, New York
BMNH Natural History Museum,
London
MNHN Muséum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, Paris
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
USNM United States Natural History,
Smithsonian Institution, Washington
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural de
Santiago de Compostela (col. Emilio
Rolán)
134
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figura 1. Técnica udlizada en la medición de las protoconchas. N: núcleo. Apc: diámetro de la
protoconcha. LN: altura del núcleo. 1/2V: diámetro de la primera media vuelta.
Figure 1. Technique used for measuring protoconchs. N: nucleus. Apc: diameter ofthe protoconch. LN:
height ofthe nucleus. 1/2V: diameter of thefirst half-whorl.
ZMUC Zoologisk Museum University,
Copenhaguen, Dinamarca
CAP colección de Anselmo Peñas, Vila-
nova i la Geltrú, Barcelona
CJH colección de José María Hernández,
Gáldar, Gran Canaria
CJP colección de Jacques Pelorce, Le
Grau du Roi, France
COD colección de Daniel Oliver, Ma-
drid
CPR colección de Peter Ryall, María
Rain, Austria
ej ejemplar con partes blandas
c concha sin partes blandas
j juvenil
f fragmento
RESULTADOS
Familia Buccinidae
Género Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884
Lachesis Risso, 1826 (non Daudin, 1803).
Nesaea Risso, 1826 (non Lamarck, 18123).
Donovania Bucquoy, Dautzenberg y Dollfus, 1882 (non Leach, 1814).
Folinaea Monterosato, 1884.
Chauvetiella F. Nordsieck, 1988.
Donovaniella F. Nordsieck, 1988
Chauvetia soni (Bruguiére, 1789) (Figs. 2-6, 66, 80-85)
Buccinum 6. Le Soni. Adanson, 1757. Hist. Nat. Sénégal, Coquillages, p. 151; pl. 10, G 3, fig. 6.
[Localidad tipo: Senegal]
Buccinum soni Bruguiére, 1789, ex Adanson. Encycl. Meth., Vers, 1, p. 283.
Donovania fasciata Sowerby, 1910. Proc. Mal. Soc. Lon., 9: 65.
Material tipo: No examinado, figurado por Fischer-Piette (1942: lám. VIII, figs. 9-14).
135
Iberas, 26 (2), 2008
Otro material estudiado: Senegal. Dakar: Madeleines: 12 c, 30 m (MHNS); lían Gorée: 3 c (MNHN);
Gorée: 6 c, 10 m (MHNS); 2 c, 3 m (MNHN); 6 c (MNHN); 44 c, 5-15 m (MNHN); Gorée, dragado:
5 c, 30 m (MHNS); Thiarouye: 1 c (MNHN); Pecio del "Tacoma": 6 c, 15 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 3 c
(MNHN); 13 c, 20 m (MHNS); sin referencia exacta: 2 c (MHNS); Cap Vert Pecio del "Tacoma": 6
ej, 20 c, 30 m (CJP); La Madeleine: 6 c, 10 m (CJP); Petite Comiche (Cap Vert): 15 c (CJP); Pecio del
"Tacoma": 9 ej, 10 m (CJP); Cap Vert: 18 c, 20 m (CJP); Les Blockaus: 10 ej, 13 c (CJP); Cap Vert: 2
ej, 2 c, 1 j, 15 m (CJP); 3 ej. Hotel Oceanium (5D2-15) (6D2-1): 19 ej, 6 m (MHNS); Gorée, costa sur
(13D2-8): 5 ej, 8 m (MHNS); 2 c, 5 f, 51 j, en sedimentos entre 20-40 m (MHNS); 1 c (MNHN); Dakar:
21 c (MNHN); 1 c (MNHN, coll. Jouseaume); 10 s, (CPR).
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 2-6, 80, 81)
fusiforme poco alargada, sólida, con
unas seis vueltas de espira y unas
dimensones de hasta 6 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 83, 84) con 1,1
vueltas, alcanza una anchura de 570 jum
(núcleo: 240 jum, primera media vuelta:
415 jum) y una altura similar. Está orna-
mentada por cordoncillos (unos veinti-
cinco en el núcleo y una quincena en su
parte final) separados por interespacios
de anchura similar. En estos interespa-
cios se observan cordoncillos axiales
muy irregulares (Fig. 85) lo que confiere
a la protoconcha un ligero aspecto reti-
culado. Los cordones tienen una
anchura similar, aunque no son exacta-
mente iguales. Además, la protoconcha
presenta, después de la primera media
vuelta, una escultura axial formada por
una docena de costillitas un poco sig-
moideas y levemente opistoclinas. En
un principio son equidistantes aunque
al final de la misma se van aproximando
entre sí. Se considera el punto de la tran-
sición con la teleoconcha, cuando estas
costillas después de aproximarse se
vuelven a distanciar. Un poco antes de
ese momento, pueden apreciarse clara-
mente los cordones espirales de la pro-
toconcha y se incian los primeros cordo-
nes de la teleoconcha.
Teleoconcha con ornamentación
formada por cordones espirales y costi-
llas axiales, de una anchura similar a sus
interespacios. En la primera vuelta apa-
recen dos cordones espirales. Un tercer
cordón va apareciendo en la parte más
elevada de las vueltas como un reborde
inferior a sutura, siendo ya evidente en
la tercera vuelta. Este cordón superior es
más estrecho que los otros dos y se man-
tendrán en esta proporción hasta la
última vuelta, donde aparece otro más
pequeño por encima, siendo por tanto
cuatro los que hay por encima de la
inserción labial. En la base de la última
vuelta, hay de seis a ocho cordones más
claramente separados por interespacios,
que son de anchura similar en los supe-
riores y más finos y más próximos entre
sí los que se encuentran sobre el canal
sifonal, donde apenas se distinguen los
interespacios. La última vuelta alcanza
casi el 60% de la altura total, mientras
que la abertura ocupa en torno al 40%.
Hay una microescultura espiral solo
visible a grandes aumentos.
Abertura (Figs. 66, 82) ovoide, canal
sifonal muy corto y ancho. En el interior
del labio externo se observan cinco dien-
tecillos, de los cuales el superior es más
pronunciado, y el inferior constituye el
borde externo del canal sifonal.
El color de la concha es blanco bri-
llante con bandas espirales de color
marrón rojizo de distinto grosor que dis-
curren sobre los cordones espirales. Prác-
ticamente todas las conchas estudiadas
presentan un patrón típico que consiste
en tres bandas coloreadas en la última
vuelta por encima de la inserción labial.
De éstas, la banda subsutural es más
estrecha que las otras dos, que tienen
una anchura similar a los cordones. Bajo
ellas, a la altura de la inserción labial, se
observa otra banda estrecha, que a veces
es blanca, y más abajo, tres bandas
anchas y otras dos o tres más estrechas.
Animal blanquecino con puntos de
color blanco leche.
Distribución: Conocida sólo de
Senegal. La cita para Ghana que hace
Micali (1999) no está confirmada.
Comentarios: Un ejemplar juvenil de
los examinados presentaba cordones
rojizos de mayor anchura que la forma
típica.
1 36
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 2-6. Chauvetia soni (Bruguiére, 1789), Dakar, 5,8, 5,5, 3,9, 4,3 y 5,0 mm (MHNS).
Figuras 7-9. Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov., Dakar, 4,0, 4,1 y 3,9 mm (MHNS). Figuras 10, 11:
Chauvetia gigantea, paratipo, Dakar, 8,6 mm (MHNS). Figura 12: Chauvatia candidissima (Phi-
lippi, 1836). Estrecho de Messina, Italia, 9 mm (CAP). Figuras 13, 14. Chauvetia affinis Montero-
sato, 1889. 13: ejemplar de Dakar, 5,7 mm. 14: ejemplar colectado por Mission Gruvel en Cabo
Rojo (MNHN), citado en Dautzenberg (1910), 7,0 mm.
Figures 2-6. Chauvetia soni (Bruguiere, 1789), Dakar, 5.8, 5.5, 3.9, 4.3 and 5.0 mm (MHNS).
Figures 7-9. Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov., Dakar, 4.0, 4.1 and 3.9 mm (MHNS). Figuras 10, 11:
Chauvetia gigantea, paratype, Dakar, 8. 6 mm (MHNS). Figure 12: Chauvetia candidissima (Phi-
lippi, 1836). Strait of Messina, Italy, 9 mm (CAP). Figures 13, 14. Chauvetia affinis Monterosato,
1889. 13: specimen from Dakar, 5.7 mm. 14: specimen collected by Mission Gruvel at Cabo Rojo
(MNHN), cited in Dautzenberg (1910), 7.0 mm.
137
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Chauvetia affinis Monterosato, 1889 (Figs. 13, 14, 68, 93-98, 181, 189)
Donovania affinis Monterosato, 1889. Journ. de Conchyl., 37: 20. (Localidad tipo: Casablanca].
Material tipo: Sintipo en la colección Monterosato. No examinado.
Otro material estudiado: Mauritania: Baie de l'Etoile: 6 j, 0-1 m (MHNS); Port Etienne [now Nouha-
dibou]: 4 c (MNHN). Senegal: Dakar: Sur de Gorée: 2 c, 25 m (MNHN); Este de Gorée: 3 c, 35 m
(MNHN); Gorée: 1 c, 5-15 m (MNHN); 7 c, 25 m (MNHN); 1 j (MNHN); entre Gorée y Dakar: 1 c,
4 j (MNHN); Petite Cote: 1 c, 14°39'N 17°20'W (MNHN); Madeleines: 1 c, 1 j, 18 m (MHNS); Grand
Thiouriba: 2 j, 30 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 1 c, 1 j, 33 m (MHNS); 1 ej (6D2-4) (MHNS); 3 ej, (8D3-6)
(MHNS); Dakar: 2 ej (10D2) (MHNS); Cap Vert, Pecio del "Tiwa": 4 ej, 35 m (CJP); Sur de M'Bao:
6 c, 30 m (MNHN); Grand Thiouriba: 1 c, 1 j, 40 m (CJP); Pecio del "Tacoma": 1 ej, 15 m (CJP); Sur
de Pecio del “Tacoma": 1 c, 25 m (MNHN); Grand Thiouriba: 1 f, 1 j, 40 m (CJP); Cap Vert: 9 c,
(MNHN); 2 ej, 0-40 m (CJP); Chartine: 1 ej (CJP); Gouye Teni'Mboth: 7 j, 3 m (CJP); Cape Rouge: 1
c (MNHN); Gouye Teni'Mboth: 4 j, 10 m (CJP); Bahía de Dakar: 2 c, 2 j, sedimentos 20-40 m (MHNS).
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 13, 14, 93)
fusiforme, aunque más cilindrica que
otras del género, sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira, y una máxima dimen-
sión de hasta 6 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 95, 96) paucispi-
ral con 0,8 vueltas, una anchura de 430
jum y una altura de 480 jum (núcleo: 270
jum y la primera media vuelta: 425 jum).
Su escultura (Fig. 97) está formada,
como en otras Chauvetia, por cordones
espirales planos entre los que se apre-
cian surcos con incisiones axiales y que,
al final, son unos 10 a 12 en número,
algo variables, y más anchos que los
interespacios. Al final de la protoconcha
se aprecian unas cinco costillas axiales.
Teleoconcha con cuatro cordones
espirales en la primera vuelta, el inferior
más estrecho, y un quinto por arriba que
está menos desarrollado y constituye un
reborde inferior de la sutura. Un sexto
cordón aparece en la penúltima vuelta a
partir del cordón superior. La última
vuelta representa el 55% de la altura
total y, en ella, se aprecian seis cordones
por encima de la inserción labial. De
ellos los superiores están más juntos y
son menos anchos que los restantes. Los
interespacios son de una anchura
similar a la de los cordones. En la base
de la concha hay una decena de cordo-
nes que se van aproximando entre sí a
medida que se acercan al final del canal
sifonal. Las costillas axiales son casi
ortoclinas y poco elevadas, y al cruzarse
con los cordones espirales se forman
tubérculos redondeados muy evidentes
(Fig. 98). En la última vuelta hay una
veintena de costillas verticales, de
anchura similar a los interespacios.
Abertura (Fig. 68, 94) ovoide, repre-
sentando el 37% de la altura total de la
concha. El color de la misma es castaño,
igual que la concha, y en ella se obser-
van cinco dientes en el interior del labio
externo. El inferior de ellos constituye el
inicio del canal sifonal, que es corto y
poco aparente.
Coloración de la concha castaño-
rojiza. La base es algo más oscura y los
tubérculos ligeramente más claros; la
protoconcha puede tener un color más
claro con una banda oscura en su centro.
Animal blanco crema con aislados
puntos blancos. Sifón más intenso de
color. Opérculo (Fig. 181) ovoide con el
núcleo subterminal. Rádula (Fig. 189)
típica, con más de 150 filas de dientes,
central rectangular, laterales con tres
cúspides, la interna más pequeña.
Distribución : Según Monterosato,
Casablanca, en Marruecos, y varias loca-
lidades del Mediterráneo, como Taor-
mina (Sicilia) y la isla de Pantellaria.
Según Dautzenberg (1910) y nuestro
material, su área de dispersión se exten-
dería a Mauritania y Senegal, recolec-
tada entre 0 y 40 m.
Comentarios : Monterosato (1889)
describe, aunque no ilustra esta especie
e indica su parecido con C. mínima de la
que se diferenciaría por su escultura
("como una lima"). Dautzenberg
(1910) la cita procedente de dragados
frente Bel- Air y al oeste de Cap Rouge y
138
OLIVER Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 15-17. Chauvetia tenuisculpta (Dautzenberg, 1891), Dakar, 11,7, 11,7 y 9,8 mm
(MHNS). Figuras 18-22. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956, Dakar, 5,3, 5,3, 5,8, 5,5 y 5,5 mm.
Figura 23. Estrella de mar ( Oreaster clavatus Müller y Troschel, 1842 ) parasitada por Chauvetia
tenuisculpta. (fotografía de Patrice Petit De Voize).
Figures 15-17. Chauvetia tenuisculpta (Dautzenberg, 1891), Dakar, 11.7, 11.7 and 9.8 mm
(MHNS). Figures 18-22. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956, Dakar, 5.3, 5.3, 5.8, 5.5 and 5.5 mm.
Figure 23. Sea star (Oreaster clavatus Müller and Troschel, 1842 ) parasitized by Chauvetia tenuis-
culpta. (photograph by Patrice Petit De Voize).
139
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Figuras 24-33. Chauvetia joani spec. nov., Dakar, paratipos, 6,9, 6,4, 5,3, 5,0, 4,9, 4,8, 6,1, 6,3,
6,7 y 6,3 mm (MHNS). Figuras 34-38. Chauvetia pelorcei spec. nov., Dakar, paratipos, 4,2, 4,3,
4,2, 4,6 y 4,3 mm (MFINS). Figuras 39-44. Chauvetia pardofasciata spec. nov., Dakar, forma
típica: 3,9, 3,7, 3,4 y 3,1 mm (MHNS); forma blanca: 3,3 y 3,0 mm (MHNS).
Figuras 24-33. Chauvetia joani spec. nov., Dakar, paratypes, 6.9, 6.4, 5.3, 5.0, 4.9, 4.8, 6.1, 6.3, 6.7
and 6.3 mm (MHNS). Figures 34-38. Chauvetia pelorcei spec. nov., Dakar, paratypes, 4.2, 4.3, 4.2,
4.6 and 4.3 mm (MHNS). Figures 39-44. Chauvetia pardofasciata spec. nov., Dakar, typical morph:
3.9, 3.7, 3.4 and 3.1 mm (MHNS); white morph: 3.3 and 3.0 mm (MHNS).
140
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 45-48. Chauvetia javieri spec. nov. Dakar; 45-47: paratipo, 7,6 mm (MNHN); 48: para-
tipo, 7,2 mm (MHNS). Figuras 49-52. Chauvetia robustalba spec. nov., Dakar, 5,4, 5,4, 5,5 y 5,6
mm (MHNS). Figuras 53-55. Chauvetia luciacuestae spec. nov., Dakar, 8.8 mm. Figuras 56, 57.
Chauvetia multilirata spec. nov. 5,8 mm, holotipo (MNCN). Figuras 58, 59. Chauvetia pardacuta
spec. nov. Dakar, 6,2 mm.
Figures 45-48. Chauvetia javieri spec. nov. Dakar; 45-47: paratype, 7.6 mm (MNHN); 48: paratype,
7.2 mm (MHNS). Figuras 49-52. Chauvetia robustalba spec. nov., Dakar, 5.4, 5.4, 5.5 y 5.6 mm
(MHNS). Figures 53-55. Chauvetia luciacuestae spec. nov., Dakar, 8.8 mm. Figures 56, 57. Chauve-
tia multilirata spec. nov. 5.8 mm, holotype (MNCN). Figures 58, 59. Chauvetia pardacuta spec. nov.
Dakar, 6.2 mm.
141
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
muestra un dibujo de la concha aunque
no aporta detalles descriptivos. Nord-
sieck (1976) describe también la especie
y la ilustra a partir de una concha proce-
dente de Rhodas. Micali (1999) tras exa-
minar los ejemplares etiquetados como
Donovania affinis de la colección de Mon-
terosato procedentes de Casablanca y de
localidades mediterráneas concluye que
el taxon Donovania affinis Monterosato,
1889 es una sinonimia de Chauvetia turri-
tellata (Deshayes, 1835). Para probarlo
aporta una fotografía de una concha
procedente de Scilla. Comenta que el
ejemplar dibujado por Dautzenberg es
similar a ejemplares de Chauvetia
brunnea procedentes de Tipaza (Argelia).
En nuestra opinión la especie des-
crita aquí y presente en Dakar, se corres-
ponde con la identificada como C. affinis
(Fig. 14) por Dautzenberg (1910). Por
lo que respecta a las citas mediterráneas
de C. affinis coincidimos con Micali en
considerarlas variedades de otras Chau-
vetia mediterráneas como C. brunnea o C.
turritellata.
Chauvetia tenuisculpta (Dautzenberg, 1891) (Figs. 15-17, 69, 99-104, 184, 185)
Donovania candidissima var. tenuisculpta Dautzenberg, 1891. Mém. Soc. Zoo/. France, 4: 41, pl. 3 fig.
3a-c.
Material tipo: No examinado.
Material estudiado: España: Cádiz: 2 ej (MNCN). Italia: 2 ej (CAP). Senegal: Dakar: 6 s (CPR); Gorée:
115 c, en la playa (MNHN); 3 c, 10 m (MHNS); 8 c (MNHN); Puerto de Gorée: 7 c, 4-5 m (MNHN);
al este del Castillo de Gorée: 5 c, sobre estrellas (MNHN); Grand Thiouribe: 1 c (MHNS); Cap Vert:
66 c (MNHN); 3 c, 30 m (MHNS); Bahía de Dakar, dragado: 3 ej, 16 c, 3 j, 20-40 m (MHNS); Gouye
Teni M'Both: 7 ej, 1 c, 20 m (CJP); Cap Vert: 20 ej, 30 c, 20 j, 15-30 m (CJP); Hotel Oceanium (6D2-
7): 1 ej, 6 m (MHNS); Charbonier, 3 ej (CJP); Gorée, costa sur (13D2-9): 3 ej, 2 c (MHNS); sedimen-
tos Bahía de Dakar, 30 j, 20-40 m (MHNS); 79 c, 2 j (MNHN); 4 c (MNHN, coll. Staadt); 2 c, 10° 19'
N, 16° 34' W, 60 m (MNHN).
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 15-17, 99)
oblongo fusiforme, sólida, con unas
ocho vueltas y una dimensión máxima
de hasta 11,1 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 101, 102) con 0,9
vueltas y una anchura en torno a 850 jum
(núcleo: 430 jum; primera media vuelta:
730 |Um) y una altura de 670 jum. Está
ornamentada por fuertes costillas (alre-
dedor de una quincena) que ya se
inician en el mismo núcleo. La transi-
ción con la teleoconcha no es tan clara
como en otras especies. Se ha conside-
rado el final de la protoconcha el punto
en el que las costillas se vuelven a dis-
tanciar tras la aproximación que habían
tenido al final de la protoconcha. Con
gran aumento (Fig. 103) se aprecia que
entre las costillas existe una microescul-
tura de líneas espirales algo irregulares.
Teleoconcha con un perfil de las
vueltas ligeramente convexo. Sutura
levemente ondulada. En la primera
vuelta hay tres cordones espirales, el
cuarto está presente ya en la tercera y el
quinto aparece en la sexta vuelta, por
debajo de la sutura y es menos ancho
que los cuatro restantes. Estos cordones
espirales son un poco más anchos que
los interespacios. En la última vuelta
hay cinco cordones por encima de la
inserción labial y, por debajo, hay cinco
cordones más, claramente separados
por interespacios y unos siete cordonci-
llos más, muy juntos en el canal sifonal.
En la última vuelta se observan una
veintena de costillas, que son similares a
sus interespacios. Abertura (Fig. 69, 100)
ligeramente ovoide, canal sifonal corto y
ancho. En el interior del labio interno
pueden verse seis dientecillos, de los
cuales el superior es más pronunciado y
el inferior constituye el borde externo
del canal sifonal. La última espira ocupa
aproximadamente el 50% de la altura
total y la boca un 35 % de la altura (las
medidas coinciden en lo esencial con
Micali, 1999).
142
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 60-64. Chauvetia gigantea spec. nov., Dakar. 60-62: holotipo, 13,9 mm (MNHN); 63:
paratipo: 13,5 mm (CJP); 64: ápice, holotipo. Figuras 65-68. Detalle de la abertura. 65: C. gigan-
tea; 66: C. soni; 67: C. tenebrosa ; 68: C. affinis.
Figures 60-64. Chauvetia gigantea spec. nov., Dakar. 60-62: holotype, 13.9 mm (MNHN); 63:
paratype: 13.5 mm (CJP); 64: apex ofthe holotype. Figures 65-68. Detail of the aperture. 65: C.
gigantea; 66: C. soni; 67: C. tenebrosa; 68: C. affinis.
143
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Color de la concha blanco leche. A
veces se aprecian zonas del periostraco
con una tinción marrón rojiza (Fig. 17),
con aspecto ferruginoso.
Animal blanquecino con puntos
muy pequeños de color blanco-leche.
Opérculo (Figs. 104, 184) ovoide con el
núcleo subterminal.
Rádula (Fig. 185) típica del género
con diente central rectangular y laterales
alargados con tres cúspides curvas y afi-
ladas.
Distribución : Se ha citado desde las
costas italianas y de Argelia y hemos
visto material de estas localidades. Sin
embargo estas citas, muy aisladas,
podrían ser ejemplares transportados
por pescadores por lo que, de momento,
la consideramos una especie oeste afri-
cana del área de Dakar. En la página de
CLEMAM (http:/ / www.somali.asso.fr/
clemam/ index.clemam.html), Ch. te-
nuisculpta no aparece como una especie
con entrada propia debido a que se
encuentra fuera del área de estudio.
Comentarios: Micali (1999) comenta
algunas diferencias en la protoconcha y
en la aparición del quinto cordón espiral
entre las conchas mediterráneas (de
Orán) y las de Senegal. En nuestro mate-
rial no se han visto diferencias significa-
tivas.
Una observación recientemente rea-
lizada por el malacólogo Jacques Pelorce
(com. pers.) sobre esta especie es que ha
sido encontrada parasitando a una
estrella de mar ( Oreaster clavatus Müller
y Troschel, 1842 ) (Fig. 23), habiéndose
visto numerosas estrellas con estos pará-
sitos y más de 10 ejemplares, tanto
jóvenes como adultos, fuertemente
pegados sobre una sola estrella.
La especie más parecida es C. candi-
dísima, pero se diferencia por la más
escasa presencia de costillas axiales en la
protoconcha y por su escultura de cor-
dones y costillas más separadas.
Dadas las diferencias de la protocon-
cha, nuestra opinión es la misma que la
de Micali (2005), es decir, que son dos
especies diferentes y fácilmente diferen-
ciadles por su protoconcha: C. candidí-
sima en el Mediterráneo y C. tenuisculpta
en el área de Dakar.
Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956 (Figs. 18-22, 70, 105-113, 186)
Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956. Atlantide Report, 4: 43, lám. 3, figs. 17, 18. [Localidad tipo: St. 56]
Material tipo: No examinado. Supuestamente en ZMUC.
Otro material estudiado: Mauritania: Bahía de FEtoile: 1 c, intermareal (MHNS); Port Etienne [now
Nouhadibou]: 1 j (MNHN). Senegal: Dakar: 8 c (CPR); 2 c, 13° 57' N, 17° 15' W, 50 m (MNHN);
Gorée: 14 ej, 20-40 m (MHNS); sur de Gorée: 4 c, 32-34 m (MNHN); 1 c, 42 m (MNHN); 2 c, 38-42
m (MNHN); 3 c (MNHN); 7 c, 95 m (MNHN); 2 ej, 4 c, 6 m (MHNS); 1 c, 14° 32 'N, 17° 25' 30" W,
50 m (MNHN); entre Gorée y Dakar: 2 c (MNHN); Cap Vert, Tacoma: 5 ej, 10-15 m (CJP); Cap Vert:
2 ej, 0-40 m (CJP); Petite Cote: 4 c, 14° 36' N, 17° 19' W, 32 m (MNHN); Joal: 2 c, 55 m (MNHN); SW
Madeleine: 3 c, 47 m (MNHN); SW Cap Manuel: 1 c, 32 m (MNHN); 1 c, 250 m (MNHN); Charbo-
nier: 5 j, 34 m (CJP); Delta del Saloum: 54 c, 13° 47' N, 17° 15' W, 50 m (MNHN); 18 c, 50 m (MNHN).
Ghana: Miamia: 3 s, 10-15 m (CPR).
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 18-22, 105,
106) fusiforme, sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira y una dimensión
máxima de hasta 6 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 108-111) con 0,9
vueltas de espira, una anchura de unas
540 jum y una altura similar. Su núcleo es
proporcionalmente ancho (núcleo 290
ium; primera media vuelta: 500 jum). La
escultura de la protoconcha está formada
por unos 18 a 20 cordones desiguales,
claramente más anchos que los interes-
pacios (la mayoría de los cordones son
entre dos y tres veces más anchos). Los
interespacios, como en la mayoría de las
especies de Chauvetia presentan incisio-
nes axiales (Figs. 112, 113). En el final de
la protoconcha se aprecian 6 a 9 cordo-
nes axiales que discurren sobre las costi-
llitas finales de la protoconcha.
144
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 69-79. Detalle de la abertura: 69: C. tenuisculpta-, 70: C. lamyi\ 71: C. joanv, 72: C. pelorcei ;
73: C. pardofasciata ; 74: C .javieri-, 73: C. robusta Iba-, 76: C. luciacuestae; 77: C. multilirata ; 78: C.
pardacuta ; 79: C. gigantea.
Figures 69-79. Detail ofthe aperture: 69: C. tenuisculpta; 70; C. lamyi; 77; C. joani; 72; C.
pelorcei; 73: C. pardofasciata; 74: C. javieri; 75; C. robustalba; 76: C. luciacuestae; 77; C. multili-
rata; 78: C. pardacuta; 79; C. gigantea.
145
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Teleoconcha con vueltas de perfil
convexo y la sutura profunda y algo ondu-
lada. Se considera iniciada cuando comien-
zan a distanciarse las costillas axiales y
desaparece la escultura espiral de la pro-
toconcha. En la primera espira hay cuatro
cordones espirales evidentes y un quinto
superior poco definido y con aspecto de
reborde subsutural. Los cordones son de
anchura similar a los interespacios. Las
costillas son ortoclinas con una leve incli-
nación prosoclina en las espiras superio-
res. Estas costillas pueden estar algo cur-
vadas y son algo más estrechas que los
interespacios. En la última espira hay cinco
cordones por encima de la inserción labial
claramente separados por interespacios
de igual tamaño. Ocasionalmente puede
aparecer un sexto cordón subsutural como
reborde. Por debajo de la inserción labial
hay de diez a doce cordones separados
por interespacios claramente más estre-
chos. Sobre el canal sifonal están los cor-
dones juntos siendo ésta una caracterís-
tica de la especie. En la última espira hay
de doce a quince costillas más estrechas
que los interspacios que no sobrepasan la
inserción labial quedando el canal sifonal
libre de ellas. Entre las costillas se pueden
observar numerosas líneas de crecimiento
claras. La última vuelta ocupa un 57 % de
la altura total.
Abertura (Figs. 70, 107) ovoide con
seis dientes en el interior del labio
externo. Canal sifonal claro, más evi-
dente y más cerrado que en otras espe-
cies, estando algo inclinado hacia la
izquierda.
El color de la mayor parte de las
conchas es castaño rojizo con la base
algo más oscura. Una concha presentaba
una amplia franja blanca en las dos
últimas vueltas. Otra concha, más clara
de color amarillento, se comentará más
abajo.
Animal de color crema con multitud
de puntos blanco-leche. Opérculo ovoide
con núcleo subterminal. Rádula (Fig.
186) con diente central rectangular con
una única cúspide y laterales con tres.
Distribución : Según el trabajo de des-
cripción original, entre Senegal y Costa
de Marfil. En nuestro material es cono-
cida del área de Dakar, entre 0 y 40 m, y
también de Mauritania.
Comentarios : Una concha muy clara de
color (Figs. 21, 22), es también fusiforme
pero algo más cilindrica que la forma
normal, y con seis vueltas de espira alcanza
5,5 mm de altura y 2,1 mm de anchura. La
protoconcha (Figs. 108, 110) de esta
supuesta variedad clara es similar en su
tamaño y anchura (555 jum), pero su núcleo
es más pequeño (255 ¡um) (primera media
vuelta: 435 jUm). La escultura del único
ejemplar está algo desgastado pero los cor-
dones que se aprecian parecen ser menos
anchos y el número de costillas axiales es
algo menor. La última vuelta ocupa el 54
% de la altura y la abertura el 37%. La teleo-
concha está ornamentada con cordones
espirales relevantes de anchura similar a
los interespacios y con costillas menos rele-
vantes con anchura algo menor que los
interespacios con una inclinación algo pro-
soclina. Hay unos cuatro cordones en la
primera vuelta, en la tercera son ya cinco
que se mantienen por encima de la inser-
ción bucal en la última vuelta. Un sexto
cordón subsutural se insinúa como un
reborde. Los dos cordones superiores son
algo más estrechos que los inferiores. En
la base de la concha hay unos nueve cor-
dones espirales más separados por claros
interespacios. En la última vuelta presenta
una veintena de costillas, de anchura
similar a los interespacios, ortoclinas o
ligeramente prosoclinas. Abertura bucal
oval con un canal sifonal claro más corto
que en la variedad oscura y menos incli-
nado. Siete dientes en la cara interna del
labio externo siendo el inferior el límite
externo del canal sifonal. Si esta forma es
algo taxonómicamente diferente, sólo
podrá deducirse en el futuro del estudio
de más material.
Chauvetia gigantea spec. nov. Oliver, Rolán y Pelorce (Figs. 10, 11, 60-65, 79,
86-88)
Chauvetia candidissima: Micali, 1999. Boíl. Malac., 34: fig. 2.
146
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 80-85. Chauvetia soni (Bruguiére, 1789), Dakar. 80: concha con el patrón habitual de
color, 5,8 mm (MHNS); 81: concha con patrón poco habitual, misma que en fig. 6, 5,0 mm
(MHNS); 82: detalle de la abertura; 83, 84: protoconcha; 85: detalle de la microescultura.
Figures 80-85. Chauvetia soni (Bruguiere, 1789), Dakar. 80: shell with the usual colour pattern, 5.8
mm (MHNS); 81: shell with unusual pattern, same as in fig. 6, 5.0 mm (MHNS); 82: detail ofthe
aperture; 83, 84: protoconch; 85: detail ofthe microsculpture.
147
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 60-62) en MNHN; un paratipo (Fig. 63) en CJP; otro (Figs. 10, 11) en
MHNS. Otro paratipo (representado en Micali, 1999, fig. 2) en la colección de Giunchi-Tisselli (San
Zaccaria).
Localidad tipo: Epopal, Dakar, 14° 36' 270" N, 17° 25' 629" W, 32 m (Septiembre/ 2007).
Etimología: El nombre específico alude a su tamaño, que es el mayor de las especies conocidas en
este género.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 60-63)
fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con unas
siete vueltas de espira y una altura
máxima supuesta de más de 14 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 64, 87) con 0,6
vueltas, y con una anchura de unos 800
ium (núcleo: 550 pm, primera media
vuelta: 800 pm) y unas 700 jum de altura;
está un poco erosionada, pero se aprecia
escultura espiral marcada.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de cor-
dones espirales algo más estrechos que
sus interespacios y costillas bastante más
estrechas que sus interespacios. En el inicio
de la teleoconcha aparecen tres cordones
espirales. En la cuarta vuelta aparece por
encima de la sutura un cuarto cordón. En
la última vuelta hay cuatro cordones por
encima de la inserción labial y, hacia la
base, aparecen de diez u once cordonci-
llos más. Los superiores están claramente
separados por interespacios claros y a
medida que se acercan al canal sifonal se
van aproximando entre ellos, quedando
los más inferiores prácticamente juntos.
La escultura axial es similar en grosor y
está formada por costillas ortoclinas o muy
poco prosoclinas, que son unas dieciocho
en la última vuelta. Se prolongan por
debajo de la inserción labial acabando cerca
del inicio del canal sifonal. Al cruzarse cor-
dones y costillas se forman nodulos
ovoides o rectangulares. La ultima vuelta
ocupa el 46 % de la altura total de la
concha. Microescultura muy fina (Fig. 88).
Abertura (Figs. 79) oval que alcanza
el 26% de la altura de la concha. En el
interior del labio externo se aprecian
cinco dientes de los que el superior es
más pronunciado y el inferior constituye
el borde externo del canal sifonal, que es
corto y está algo girado hacia la
izquierda.
Color de la concha castaño claro o
blanquecino, con la protoconcha, la base
y la abertura blancas. Los nodulos son
todos perfectamente blancos distin-
guiéndose sobre el fondo castaño.
Periostraco castaño.
Dimensiones : Holotipo 13,9 x 4,7 mm;
paratipos de unas dimensiones similares.
Animal desconocido.
Distribución : Sólo conocida de la
Bahía de Dakar, viviendo en fondos
rocosos basálticos, a una profundidad
de alrededor de 32 m.
Comentarios : Esta especie por su
tamaño (casi el doble de la mayoría de las
especies del género) se diferencia de
todas las conocidas tanto del Mediterrá-
neo como de Senegal. Por otra parte, el
patrón de color es totalmente diferente de
todas ellas, apareciendo como un nega-
tivo de otras especies, que tienen un
patrón de color de nodulos castaños
sobre un fondo más claro, como C. lucia-
cuestae spec. nov., de Senegal, y del Medi-
terráneo, C. lefebvrei (Maravigna, 1840), y
algunas formas de otras especies.
Cuando carece de periostraco, por su
tamaño grande, podría confundirse con
C. tenuisculpta , pero en esta son diferen-
tes la coloración de la concha y la fuerte
escultura axial de la protoconcha.
Chauvetia candidissima (Philippi,
1836) del Mediterráneo (Fig. 12) es más
blanca, más ancha y más sólida y tiene 4
cordones espirales por vuelta. La proto-
concha (Fig. 90) tiene un mayor número
de cordones en la zona de transición a la
teleoconcha y una microescultura muy
fina (Fig. 91).
Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov. (Figs. 7-9, 67, 114-120)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 115) en el MNCN (15.05/47536). Paratipos en las siguientes coleccio-
nes: AMNH (1), BMNH 20080487 (1), MNHN (1, Fig. 114), MNHN (20 c, 12 m), MNHN (9 c), MHNS
148
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 86-88. Chauvetia gigantea spec. nov. 86: paratipo, Dakar, 8,6 mm (MHNS); 87: protocon-
cha, Dakar; 88; detalle de la microescultura, Dakar. Figuras 89-92: Chauvetia candidissima (Phi-
lippi, 1836); 89: protoconcha, de un juvenil de Malta; 90, 91: detalle de la microescultura de la
protoconcha; 92: detalle de la microescultura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 86-88. Chauvetia gigantea spec. nov. 86: paratype, Dakar, 8. 6 mm (MHNS); 87: protoconch,
Dakar; 88; detail ofthe microsculpture, Dakar. Figures 89-92: Chauvetia candidissima (Philippi,
1836); 89: protoconch of a juvenile from Malta; 90, 91: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch;
92: detail of the microsculpture ofthe teleoconch.
149
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
(20 c, 13 j), USNM (1), CJH (1), CPR (1), CDO (5), CJP (5 ej, 9 c). Todos ellos de la localidad tipo.
Otros paratipos de Dakar, Senegal: Les Madeleines, 3 c, 1 j, 18 m (MHNS); Gorée: 3 c, 3 j, 6 m
(MHNS); Cap Vert: 12 c, 13 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 2 c, 30 m (CJP); Dakar: 2 ej, (8D3-7) (MHNS); 1
ej. Bahía de Gorée (CJP); 35 c. Bahía de Gorée, 5-15 m (MNHN); Cap Vert, Pecio del "Tacoma": 2
c, 13 m (MHNS); Dakar (sin localidad): 6 c (CJP); Bahía de Dakar, 1 ej, (13D2-8), 5 c, 60 j, 20-40 m
(MHNS); Gorée: 2 ej, 18 m (13D2-6) (MHNS).
Localidad tipo: Pecio del "Tacoma", Dakar, Senegal, entre 20 y 30 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico alude al oscuro color de la concha.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 7-9, 114,
115) fusiforme alargada, con unas 4-5
vueltas y unas dimensiones máximas de
hasta 4.0 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 117, 118) con una
vuelta de espira, y unas dimensiones de
472 pm de diámetro (el núcleo, 212 pm, la
primera media vuelta 340 pm, y una
altura de 327 pm. Está ornamentada con
unos 13 ó 14 cordoncillos irregurales, con
los espacios intermedios en los que
aparece una microescultura (Fig. 119)
muy irregular, en la que las costillitas
axiales se distinguen con dificultad.
Hacia el final de la protoconcha, hay unas
3-4 costillas axiales antes de iniciarse la
escultura típica de la teleoconcha.
Teleoconcha con unas cuatro vueltas
algo convexas y que presentan 4 cordo-
nes en las primeras vueltas y, por
encima de la inserción labial, 5 ó 6 en la
última, los dos superiores muy peque-
ños; además, por debajo, hay unos 10
cordones más que se van juntando hacia
la base. Abertura (Figs. 67, 116) algo
ovoide, con cinco dientes en el interior
del labio externo y un canal sifonal
abierto y corto.
Coloración de la concha castaña
oscura, pero los interespacios entre los
cordones espirales son algo más claros,
por lo que estos destacan sobre el fondo.
Dimensiones : el holotipo tiene unas
dimensiones de 3,6 x 1,5 mm; los ejem-
plares mayores llegan habitualmente
hasta 4.0 mm, aunque algún ejemplar
enorme alcanzó los 4,8 mm.
Animal : se hicieron observaciones
sobre unos pocos ejemplares que fueron
recolectados vivos. El animal tiene un
color de fondo blanquecino, o ligera-
mente crema con puntos blancos, que se
observan en el extremo del sifón y en la
base, mientras que todo el dorso es de
color negro intenso.
Distibución : Conocida del área de
Dakar, Senegal.
Discusión : C. tenebrosa tiene un
aspecto general que recuerda el de la
concha de C. brunnea (Donovan, 1804).
La descripción de esta última especie
puede verse en Fretter y Graham
(1984), Mifsud (1994), Micali (1999),
aunque hay una clara dificultad para
determinar con precisión las diferencias
del taxón C. brunnea con las especies
más próximas, C. mamillata Riso, 1826, y
C. turritellata Deshayes, 1835. Este pro-
blema se afrontará en una revisión,
actualmente en curso, sobre las especies
del Mediterráneo y su comparación con
las del Atlántico y norteafricanas.
Las diferencias de Chauvetia tenebrosa
spec. nov. con C. brunnea (de las costas de
Galicia y de la Bretaña francesa) son las
siguientes: C. brunnea tiene un mayor
tamaño, con un color castaño uniforme,
los cordones espirales más aplanados, más
del doble de anchos que sus interespacios,
y la protoconcha es más ancha. El diáme-
tro de la protoconcha de C. brunnea es refe-
rido por Fretter y Graham (1984) como
teniendo entre 650 y 1000 ¡um. Thiriot-
Quiévreux y Rodríguez Babio (1975, lám.
6B) muestran una fotografía en la que este
diámetro es de unos 450 pm, pero en el
material de la Bretaña francesa examinado
por nosotros, el diámetro está entre 500 y
750 pm; en todos los casos examinados,
mayor que el de C. tenebrosa. Otra dife-
rencia es la escultura de los interespacios
entre los cordoncillos de la protoconcha
que, en C. brunnea, tienen una escultura
de muescas axiales bien definida (Thiriot-
Quiévreux y Rodríguez Babio, 1975),
mientras que, en C. tenebrosa (Fig. 119) la
escultura es muy tenue y mal definida.
Las diferencias con Chauvetia joani
spec. nov. pueden verse en el apartado
de comentarios de esta especie.
150
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 93-98. Chauvetia affinis. 93: concha, 3,7 mm; 94: detalle de la abertura; 95, 96: protocon-
cha; 97: detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha; 98: detalle de la microescultura de la teleo-
concha.
Figures 93-98. Chauvetia affinis. 93: shell, 5.7 mm; 94: detail ofthe aperture; 95, 96: protoconch; 97:
detail ofthe microsculpture of the protoconch; 98: detail ofthe micros culpture of the teleoconch.
151
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Chauvetia joatti spec. nov. (Figs. 24-33, 71, 121-127, 182, 187)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 121) in MNCN (15.05/47526). Paratypes en las siguientes colecciones:
AMNH (5), BMNH (20080490) (5), MNHN (5, Fig. 122), USNM (5), CJH (5), CPR (3), CDO (10), CJP
(300 sp). Todos ellos de la localidad tipo. Otros paratipos: Les Madeleines: 7 ej, 7-13 m (CJP); Cap
Vert Thiouriba: 6 ej, 33 m (CJP); Les Blockaus: 28 ej, 10-17 m (CJP); Somone: 2 ej, (CJP); Cap Vert: 7
ej (CJP); Takh Mon Khar: 2 ej, 35 m (CJP); Presquel'ile du Cap Vert: 1 ej, 5-40 m (CJP); Sable coqui-
lles Cap Vert (09/1995): 7 ej (CJP); Sable coquilles Cap Vert (09/ 1995): 5 ej (CJP); Pecio del "Tacoma":
198 ej, 15 m (CJP); Les Blockaus: 4 ej, 10-17 m (CJP); Grand Thiouriba: 8 ej, 40 m (CJP); PresqueFile
du Cap Vert (9/98): 5 ej, 5-40 m (CJP); Grand Thiouriba, 1 ej, 40 m (CJP); 4 ej (CJP); Gouye Teni'M
both: 3 c, 7 j, 25 m (CJP); Cap Vert, Pecio del "Tiwa": 6 ej, 35 m (CJP); Les Madeleines: 1 c, 6 j, 7-13
m (CJP); Cap Vert: 12 ej, 0-40 m (CJP); Charbonieres : 11 ej, 34 m (CJP); Senegal (sin precisar): 2 ej
(CJP); Seminóle: 3 c, 38 m (MNHN); Madeleines: 2 c, 16 j (C. sp. Ib) 18 m (MHNS); Gorée: 12 ej
(sp.b) 20-40 m (MHNS); Gorée: 7 c, 3 j, 1 f, 6 m (MHNS); Pecio del "Tacoma": 50 c, 90 j, 15 m (MHNS);
Cap Vert: 34 ej and j, 33 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 6 ej, 13 m (MHNS); Grand Thouribe: 10 ej, 30 m
(MHNS); Grand Thiouriba: 5 c, 2 j, 40 m. Lotes en alcohol: Hotel Oceanium (5D2-15): 5 ej, 6 m
(MHNS): frente H. Oceanium, dragado (7D2-25): 4 ej, 20 m (MHNS); 1 ej. Almadies (10D2-8): 1 ej,
1 m (MHNS); Puerto de Gorée: 11 c, 6 m (MNHN); Gorée, costa sur (13D2-9): 18 ej, 10 m (MHNS);
Sur de Gorée: 2 c, 25 m (MNHN); Este de Gorée: 1 c, 6 m (MNHN); Hotel Oceanium (7DK03-9): 3
ej, 5 m (MHNS); Gorée (8DK3-7): 2 ej, 6 m (MHNS); Dakar: 7 ej, 20 m (MHNS); Dakar: 2 ej, 30 m
(MHNS); Gorée, costa sur (13D2-8): 1 ej, 15 m (MHNS); Bahía de Gorée: 2 c, 15 m (MNHN); 50 c,
5-15 m (MNHN); Dakar: 5 ej, (MHNS); 1 ej, (7D3-9 y 10) (MHNS); 1 c (MNHN); 1 c, 14°27N 17°33W,
170-200 m (MNHN); 2 c, 46-50 m (MNHN); Diago: 1 c, 19° 12' N, 16° 26' W, 6 m (MNHN); Bahía de
Saloum: 1 c, 13° 57' N, 17° 15' W, 50 m (MNHN); entre Gorée y Dakar: 50 c (MNHN).
Otro material estudiado: Mauritania. Baie de l'Etoile: 1 j (dudoso). Senegal. al Sur de M'Bao: 2 s
(en malas condiciones) (MNHN); Dakar: 11 c (mal estado) (MNHN).
Localidad tipo: Cap Vert "Tacoma", Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 13 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico se dedica a Joan Daniel Oliver, hijo del primer autor, por su cons-
tante colaboración.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 24-33, 121,
122) oblongo-fusiforme con unas seis
vueltas de espira, sólida y una dimen-
sión máxima de 7,9 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 124-126) con 1
vuelta de espira y 575 ¡um de anchura
(núcleo: 215 pin; primera media vuelta:
425 pin) y 470 pm de altura. Escultura
formada por una veintena de cordones
espirales, planos, que en ocasiones se
interrumpen o se inician antes de llegar
al final. Los cordones suelen variar algo
de anchura y son apenas algo más
anchos que los interespacios. En los
surcos que separan los cordones se
observan micropliegues axiales que le
dan un aspecto en forma de casillas. Al
final de la protoconcha aparecen unas
cinco o seis costillas axiales que se van
separando progresivamente a medida
que se hacen más relevantes.
Teleoconcha con cuatro cordones
espirales a su inicio. El superior, tan solo
forma el reborde inferior de la sutura,
mientras que los tres inferiores suelen
tener una anchura similar. Pronto el
cordón superior se separa de la sutura y
aparece por encima un quinto cordón
espiral. La anchura de estos dos cordo-
nes subsuturales siempre es menor que
la de los tres inferiores. La última vuelta
representa en torno al 55% de la altura
total de una concha adulta. En ella, hay
seis cordones por encima de la inserción
labial. Los cuatro inferiores son eviden-
tes si bien el superior de estos suele ser
más estrecho. Los dos superiores son de
una menor anchura y menos evidentes.
Los interespacios son de una anchura
similar a la de los cordones espirales.
Hay entre diez y doce costillas en cada
vuelta de espira medianamente eleva-
das y cuya anchura, al principio es
similar a los interespacios, pero luego se
separan más y, por tanto, tienen menor
anchura que sus interespacios. Las costi-
llas axiales elevan los cordones espirales
que pasan sobre ellas, haciéndolos más
prominentes y dando la impresión de
que son más claros. La base presenta de
152
OLI VER Y ROLÁN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 99-104. Chauvetia tenuisculpta (Dautzenberg, 1891). 99: concha, 10,5 mm; 100: detalle
de la abertura; 101, 102: protoconcha; 103: detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha; 104:
opérculo.
Figures 99-104. Chauvetia tenuisculpta (Dautzenberg, 1891). 99: shell, 10.5 mm; 100: detail ofthe
aperture; 101, 102: protoconch; 103: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch; 104: operculum.
153
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
diez a once cordones espirales que van
aproximándose y estrechándose en el
canal sifonal. Microescultura de líneas
espirales (Fig. 127) sólo apreciable con
grandes aumentos.
Abertura (Fig. 71, 123) oval, repre-
sentando algo menos del 40% de la
concha adulta (entre el 35 y el 38 %). El
labio externo es más abierto que en otras
especies de Chauvetia y presenta seis
dientes en su cara interna, siendo el
inferior el inicio del canal sifonal. Éste es
muy corto y está inclinado hacia la
derecha, siendo esta una característica
típica de la especie.
Color castaño oscuro o castaño-ama-
rillento en la mayoría de las conchas
estudiadas. Algunas son de color uni-
forme pero en muchas otras los cordo-
nes son más claros que el fondo, lo que
le da un aspecto lineado. Algunas
conchas son de color amarillento más
claro, con una banda rojiza subsutural y
otra en la base de la concha. Hay
también ejemplares completamente
blancos. Dos de los ejemplares examina-
dos eran de color marrón oscuro con la
base blanca.
Dimensiones : el holotipo tiene unas
dimensiones de 5,4 x 2,3 mm; los ejem-
plares mayores llegan hasta 7,9 milíme-
tros de altura y 2,7 de anchura.
Animal blanquecino con manchas y
puntos blanco-leche. El sifón y los tentá-
culos son ligeramente amarillos con
puntos blancos y el pie es casi blanco
con puntos opacos blanco-leche. Opér-
culo (Fig. 182) ovoide, con núcleo sub-
central.
Rádula (Fig. 187) muy pequeña y
alargada, con más de 160 filas de
dientes, central rectangular con una
cúspide, y lateral con tres, curvadas
hacia dentro.
Distribución : Desde Mauritania a
Dakar, entre 0 y 40 m.
Discusión: Es con mucho la especie
más abundante en la zona estudiada.
Micali (1999, figs. 8 y 9) ilustra dos
conchas procedentes de Senegal, que
menciona como Chauvetia sp. 1; estas
conchas podrían corresponderse con la
presente especie. Las fotografías presen-
tadas así lo hacen suponer, si bien
algunos detalles dados en la descrip-
ción, como la altura de 10 mm, la pro-
porción de la altura de la última vuelta
o el número de cordones en esta vuelta
(de 25) serían más cuestionables.
La diferenciación se debe hacer con
las siguientes especies:
Chauvetia brunnea (Donovan, 1804) de
Europa, es más pequeña en tamaño pero
sus cordones espirales son más anchos que
en Chauvetia joani spec. nov. En el caso de
los juveniles, se distinguirían por tener un
cordón menos en la última vuelta y un
canal sifonal más vertical que en C. joani.
Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov. tiene una
concha más pequeña, menos aguzada, la
protoconcha es más pequeña y con escul-
tura entre los cordoncillos más marcada.
Chauvetia procerula Monterosato,
1889 tiene el canal sifonal más claro, las
costillas más pronunciadas y menos
numerosas; la abertura más pequeña y
la protoconcha con menor número de
cordones espirales
Chauvetia mamillata Risso, 1826 tiene
el canal sifonal vertical, no inclinado; La
abertura bucal es más cerrada y las cos-
tillas axiales son más pronunciadas y
menos numerosas; la abertura más
pequeña y protoconcha con menor
número de cordones.
Chauvetia pardacuta spec. nov., ver
más adelante, en el apartado de Comen-
tarios de esta especie.
Chauvetia pelorcei spec. nov. (Figs. 34-38, 72, 128-133)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 128) en MNCN (15.05/47527). Paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
AMNH (1), BMNH (20080491) (1), MNHN (1), MHNS (10), USNM (1), CJH (1), CDO (1), CPR (1),
CJP (18), todos de la localidad tipo. Otros paratipos: Senegal: Dakar: Madeleines: 18 c, 4 j, 3 f, 18 m
(MHNS); Grand Thouribe: 1 ej, 18-30 m (MHNS); Gorée: 1 c, 1 j, 1 f, 20-40 m (MHNS); Pecio del
"Tacoma": 10 ej, 15-18 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 3 c, 1 j, 18-33 m (MHNS); Cap. Vert: 3 ej, 13-18 m
(MHNS); Cap Vert, Petit Thiouriba: 14 ej, 33 m (CJP); Presqu'ile Cap Vert (09/98): 41 ej, 35 m (CJP);
154
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 105-113. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956. 105: concha con el patrón claro de color, 5,4
mm; 106: concha con patrón oscuro de color, 5,8 mm; 107: detalle de la abertura; 108, 110; pro-
toconcha, de concha clara; 109, 111; protoconcha, de concha oscura; 112, 113: detalle de la
microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 105-1 13. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956. 105: shell with the palé colour pattern, 5.4 mm; 106:
shell with a dark colour pattern, 5.8 mm; 107: detail ofthe aperture; 108, 110; protoconch, ofa palé
shell; 109, 1 1 1; protoconch, ofa dark shell; 112, 1 13: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
155
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Cap Vert, pecio del "Tacoma" (30 / 08/98): 5 c, 1 j, 13 m (CJP); Cap Vert (arena conchífera) (09 / 1995):
2 c, 3 j (CJP); Pecio del "Tacoma" : 2 c, 10 j, 15 m (CJP); Grand Thiouriba: 45 ej, 40 m (CJP); Les Made-
leines: 2 c, 4 j, 7-13 m (CJP); Grand Thiouriba: 4 ej, 40 m (CJP); Gouye Temi' Mboth: 3 c, 3 j (CJP);
Cap Vert: 6 ej, 0-40 m (CJP); Charbonier: 1 ej, 34 m (CJP); lej. Bahía de Dakar, dragado (7D2-10): 1
ej (MHNS); Cap Vert: 4 ej (CJP); 4 c, 29 j, sedimentos entre 20-40 m (MHNS); SW Cap Manuel: 1 c,
50 m (MNHN).
Otro material estudiado: Varios ejemplares de la localidad tipo fueron disueltos para estudio
radular.
Localidad tipo: Cap Vert, pecio del "Tiwa", Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 38 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico se dedica al malacólogo Jacques Pelorce, de Paris, por su impor-
tante aportación de material a este trabajo.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 34-38, 128)
oblongo-fusiforme, sólida, con unas
seis-siete vueltas de espira y unas
dimensiones máximas de unos 4,7 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 130, 131) con 0,8
vueltas y una anchura de 475 jum de
(núcleo: 200 jum y primera media vuelta:
370 jum) y 525 pm de altura, ornamen-
tada por cordoncillos espirales (una
docena en su tramo final) que tiene, por
lo general, una anchura similar a la de
sus interespacios. Al final de la proto-
concha aparecen dos o tres costillitas
axiales rectas. La microescultura de los
espacios entre estos cordoncillos (Figs.
132, 133), muestra un cruzado muy irre-
gular entre lineas espirales y axiales.
Teleoconcha con unas seis vueltas,
convexas y por lo general angulosas, la
sutura ondulada y profunda. Cordones
espirales y costillas axiales, al cruzarse,
forman tubérculos nodulosos algo
sobresalientes. La teleoconcha se inicia
con tres cordones espirales y, por
encima, hay un cuarto cordón que
aparece como un reborde subsutural. En
la penúltima vuelta hay cinco cordones,
de los cuales, los dos superiores tienen
notablemente menor anchura. De los
tres inferiores, el más ancho es el central
y, por lo tanto, el más prominente. En
muchas conchas ese cordón confiere al
perfil de la espira un aspecto anguloso.
Los cordones son claramente más
anchos que sus interespacios y, al ser de
color claro, contrastan con el fondo
rojizo de aquellos. La última vuelta
representa el 58% de la altura total y, en
ella, hay cinco cordones por encima de
la inserción labial siendo los dos supe-
riores muy estrechos e incluso el supe-
rior puede desaparecer. Por debajo de la
inserción labial aparecen de diez a once
cordones, más anchos que sus interespa-
cios y que se van juntando en el canal
sifonal. Hay unas diez costillas en cada
vuelta casi tan anchas como sus interes-
pacios y que al cruzarse con los cordo-
nes originan tubérculos más o menos
prominentes.
Abertura (Figs. 72, 129) redondeada,
representa el 40 % de la altura total, con
seis dientes en el interior del labio
externo. Canal sifonal corto pero evi-
dente.
Color de la concha rojizo con cordo-
nes algo más claros, que al ser más
anchos que los interespacios, le dan un
aspecto lineado. La base de la concha y
el canal sifonal son rojizos.
Dimensiones : El holotipo tiene 4,5 x
2,6 mm.
Animal de color crema con puntos
blanco-leche. Zona oscura en el dorso
respetando la parte anterior del pie.
Algunas manchas en el dorso del sifón.
Distribución : Sólo conocida de Dakar
entre 5 y 40 metros.
Comentarios: Las conchas de esta
especie pueden tener un perfil de espira
más o menos uniformemente convexo o
angular en función de la prominencia de
los cordones espirales.
En el área estudiada no hay especies
morfológicamente semejantes. La que
aparentemente parecería más similar
sería C. guinchiorum Micali, 1999, del
Mediterráneo, que guarda cierto seme-
janza, sobre todo en el aspecto cromático,
por el contraste de los anchos cordones
claros con el fondo de concha rojizo. Esta
especie mediterránea parece ser una
especie muy local y su área de distribu-
ción se limita a las costas italianas, por lo
1 56
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 114-120. Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov. 114: paratipo, 3,7 mm (MNHN); 115: holotipo,
3.6 mm (MNCN); 116: detalle de la abertura; 117, 118; protoconcha; 119; detalle de la microes-
cultura de la protoconcha; 120: detalle de la microescultura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 114-120. Chauvetia tenebrosa spec. nov. 114: paratype, 3.7 mm (MNHN); 115: holotype,
3.6 mm (MNCN); 116: detail ofthe aperture; 117, 118; protoconch; 119; detail ofthe microsculpture
ofthe protoconch; 120: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe teleoconch.
157
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
que geográficamente sería poco probable
esa dispersión para una especie de proto-
concha paucispiral y posiblemente lecito-
trófica, con poca capacidad de disper-
sión. Según el trabajo de descripción ori-
ginal, y un ejemplar que se ha podido
comparar (CAP), la protoconcha de C.
giunchiorum es más alta y más ancha, con
unos 20 cordoncillos espirales, la colora-
ción es algo diferente, con color blanco de
fondo y cordoncillos castaños muy finos
en los interespacios, y con una base de
color blanco; además, tendría más costi-
llas axiales al final de la protoconcha.
Chauvetia pardofasciata spec. nov. (Figs. 39-44, 73, 134-143)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 134) in MNCN (15.05/47528). Paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
AMNH (1), BMNH (20080486) (1), MNHN (1), MHNS (1), USNM (1), CDO (1), CJH (1), CPR (1),
todos procedentes de la localidad tipo. Otros paratipos: Senegal: Dakar: Madeleines: 1 c, 1 j, 18 m
(MHNS); Gorée: 18 ej, 20-40 m (MHNS); 3 c (MNHN); Gorée: 1 c, 1 j, 1 f, 6 m (MHNS); entre Dakar
y Gorée: 4 c, dragado 20-30 m (MHNS); Pecio del "Tacoma": 2 ej, 15 m (MHNS); Cap Vert: 1 ej, 13
m (MHNS); Petit Corniche, Cap Vert: 10 ej, 5 j, 3-7 m (CJP); Cap Vert (09/96): 1 j, N'Both, 6-7 m
(CJP); 2 ej, 5-40 m (CJP); Grand Thiouriba: 1 c, 20 m (CJP); Gouye Temi' M'Both: 6 c, 1 j (CJP); 3 ej,
(8D3-7) (MHNS); 2 ej, (10D2-9) (MHNS); 15 c, 19 j, sedimentos de la bahía, entre 20-40 m (MHNS).
Otro material estudiado: Dos conchas de la localidad tipo fueron destruidas para estudio radular.
Localidad tipo: Gorée, Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 20-40 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico hace alusión a las bandas castañas que presenta la concha, en su
forma más habitual.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 39-44, 134,
135) pupoide, sólida, con unas cinco
vueltas de espira, y llegando a alcanzar
hasta 4.0 mm de altura.
Protoconcha (Figs. 136-139) paucis-
piral, con 0.8 vueltas de espira y que
alcanza 515 pm de altura y 475 de
anchura (núcleo: 240 jum, y primera
media vuelta: 440 jum). Ornamentada
por una quincena de cordones al final
de la protoconcha más o menos de la
misma anchura y equidistantes, separa-
dos por surcos con una estriación axial
(Figs. 140, 141). La anchura de los cordo-
nes es algo mayor que la de los interes-
pacios, aunque en el inicio de la proto-
concha estos cordones pueden ser
menos anchos que sus interespacios, en
los que se pueden observar las típicas
incisiones axiales de muchas protocon-
chas de Chauvetia. Al final de la proto-
concha, hay tres o cuatro costillas verti-
cales, algo opistoclinas. La parte supe-
rior de las costillas se curva formando
una estrecha repisa subsutural sólo
visible con el microscopio electrónico de
barrido.
Teleoconcha que se inicia con tres
cordones espirales de los que el superior
aparece como un mero reborde de la
sutura, aunque pronto se separa. En la
última vuelta hay cuatro cordones por
encima de la inserción labial de los que
el superior es claramente más estrecho.
En la base de la concha hay nueve cor-
dones al principio separados regular-
mente pero que se juntan en el canal
sifonal. Los cordones prácticamente
tienen la misma anchura que los interes-
pacios. En estos se observa una microes-
cultura espiral (Figs. 142, 143) en forma
de microcordoncillos. Hay una docena
de costillas de anchura similar a los inte-
respacios que, al cruzarse con los cordo-
nes espirales, originan tubérculos redon-
deados, algo elevados. La última espira
ocupa el 66% de la altura total.
Abertura (Figs. 73) ligeramente oval,
representando el 44% de la altura total
de la concha. Canal sifonal corto, no
muy abierto y poco marcado. Cinco
dientes en el interior del labio externo.
Color de la concha, blanco, con los
cordones inferiores de color marrón
rojizo, mientras el subsutural también es
blanco. En la última vuelta, también es
blanco un nuevo cordón más pequeño
que aparece por encima del subsutural;
también son blancos los últimos de la
base. Algunas conchas son totalmente
158
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 121-127. Chauvetia joani spec. nov. 121: holotipo, 5,4 mm (MNCN); 122: paradpo, 5,8
mm (MNHN); 123: detalle de la abertura; 124-126: protoconcha; 127: detalle de la microescul-
tura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 121-127. Chauvetia joani spec. nov. 121: holotype, 5.4 mm (MNCN); 122: paratype, 5.8 mm
(MNHN); 123: detail of the aperture; 124-126: protoconch; 127: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe
teleoconch.
159
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Figuras 128-133. Chauvetia pelorcei spec. nov. 128: holotipo, 4,7 mm (MNCN); 129: detalle de la
abertura; 130, 131: protoconcha; 132, 133: detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 128-133. Chauvetia pelorcei spec. nov. 128: holotype, 4.7 mm (MNCN); 129: detail ofthe
aperture; 130, 131: protoconch; 132, 133: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
160
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 134-143. Chauvetia pardofasciata spec. nov. 134: holotipo, 3,8 mm (MNCN); 133: para-
tipo, forma blanca, 3,0 mm (MNHN); 136-138: protoconcha, forma con bandas; 139: protocon-
cha, forma blanca; 140; detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha, forma blanca; 14 1; detalle
de la microescultura de la protoconcha, forma con bandas; 142: detalle de la microescultura de la
teleoconcha, forma con bandas; 143: detalle de la escultura de la teleoconcha, forma blanca.
Figures 134-143. Chauvetia pardofasciata spec. nov. 134: holotype, 3.8 mm (MNCN); 135: paratype,
white morph, 3.0 mm (MNHN); 136-138: protoconch, banded morph; 139: protoconch, white
morph; 140; detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch, white morph; 141; detail ofthe microsculp-
ture of the protoconch, banded morph; 142: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe teleoconch, banded
morph; 143: detail of the microsculpture of the teleoconch, white morph.
161
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
blancas, sin ninguna traza de castaño.
La protoconcha es blanca, aunque a
veces tiene un ligero color violáceo.
Dimensiones: el holotipo mide 3,8 x
1,8 mm.
Animal de color blanco lechoso,
sifón casi transparente y con aislados
puntos blanco leche.
Distribución: Conocida del área de
Dakar, entre 3 y 40 m.
Comentarios: La forma con bandas
tiene una aparente similitud con C. soni ,
pero se diferencia porque esta última
especie es más grande, la protoconcha
más ancha, y en el patrón de color tiene
dos bandas castañas marcadas pero, en
la última vuelta, por encima y por
debajo, hay dos bandas muy finas (a
veces sin color), y en la zona basal.
también hay bandas castañas muy finas.
En la protoconcha, después de la zona
sin escultura axial aparecen a lo largo de
media vuelta unas 12-13 costillas axiales
fuertes. La microescultura de la proto-
concha en C. soni, tiene entre los cordo-
nes, una serie de filetes dispuestos muy
irregularmente, al contrario de lo que
ocurre en C. pardofasciata.
Las conchas con coloración blanca, se
podrían confundir a primera vista con
las de C. robustalba spec. nov. pero estas
son más grandes, más estrechas y con el
ápice de color castaño, y tienen aislados
puntos castaños en la teleoconcha.
Las dos formas, blanca y con bandas
castañas, no son absolutamente defini-
das en una u otra variedad, ya que hay
ejemplares con formas intermedias.
Chauvetia javieri spec. nov. (Figs. 45-48, 74, 144-151)
Chauvetia sp. 1. Micali, 1999. Bol. Malac., 34: 66, figs. 8, 9.
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 144) en MNCN (15.05/47529). Paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
Cap Vert: 1 ej, (exCJP) (MNHN); Gorée: 1 c (Fig. 145), 1 ej, 3 j, 1 f, 15 m (MHNS); 3 c, 14°N 17°2'W,
50 m (MNHN); Pecio del "Tacoma": 2 c, 1 ej, 30 m (CJP); Pecio del "Tacoma": 1 c, 15 m (BMNH
20080488); Bahía de Dakar: 1 ej, 20 m (MHNS); sur de Gorée: 2 c, 32-34 m (MNHN); 8 c, 39 m
(MNHN); 1 c, 30-40 m (MNHN); 5 c, 42 m (MNHN); Seminóle: 17 c, 38 m (MNHN); Bahía del
Saloum: 6 c, 50 m (MNHN).
Otro material estudiado: Senegal: Dakar: Gorée: 2 j, dudosos (MHNS); sur de Cap Manuel: 4 c
(deterioriadas), 50 m (MNHN).
Localidad tipo: Cap Vert, Pecio del "Tacoma", Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 30 m.
Etimología: El nombre de esta especie se dedica a Javier Oliver, hijo del primer autor, por su cons-
tante colaboración.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 45-48, 144,
145) fusiforme, sólida, con unas siete
vueltas de espira y una dimensión
máxima de 7,8 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 147-149) con 1,1
vueltas y 775 jum de anchura (núcleo: 410
jum y primera media vuelta: 570 ¡um) y
unas 730 pm de altura. Está ornamentada
por cordones planos, de anchura variable
pero claramente más anchos que los inte-
respacios. En el tramo final de la proto-
concha se observan de doce a quince cor-
doncillos. En los interespacios se obser-
van las típicas incisiones, aunque más
continuas que en otras especies de Chau-
vetia. Hay una importante escultura axial
formada por más de una veintena de cos-
tillitas que se inician a partir del núcleo y
que van ganando en relevancia a medida
que se acercan al final de la protoconcha;
son prácticamente ortoclinas y rectas
aunque se curvan muy ligeramente en su
parte más alta.
Teleoconcha con vueltas convexas y
sutura profunda y ondulada. Las vueltas
están ornamentadas por cordones espi-
rales y costillas, ambos más anchos que
sus respectivos interespacios. En la
cuarta vuelta, ya hay siete cordones que,
en la última vuelta, se mantienen por
encima de la inserción final de la espira
y, en la parte basal, hay una docena más.
En la última vuelta, la escultura axial
está formada por diez o doce costillas
162
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 144-151. Chauvetia javieri spec. nov. 144: holotipo, 7,6 mm (MNCN); 145: paradpo, 7,3
mm (MHNS); 146: detalle de la abertura; 147-149: protoconcha; 150, 151: detalle de la microes-
cultura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 144-151. Chauvetia javieri spec. nov. 144: holotype, 7.6 mm (MNCN); 145: paratype, 73
mm (MHNS); 146: detail ofthe aperture; 147-149: protoconch; 150, 151: detail ofthe microsculpture
of the teleoconch.
163
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
convexas y algo prosoclinas. Esta última
vuelta representa el 56 % de la altura.
Abertura (Figs., 74, 146) oval, ocu-
pando el 38% de la altura total de la
concha. En la parte interna del labio
externo se pueden observar unos diez
dientecillos algo oblicuos, de los que el
inferior es el mayor y forma el margen
externo del canal sifonal, que es corto y
ancho.
Color de la concha amarillento con
base y canal sifonal rojizos. También hay
tonalidades rojizas en el ápice y en la
zona sutural.
Dimensiones: el holotipo mide 7,6 x
3,5 mm.
Animal con coloración blanca, con
puntos blanco leche.
Distribución: Conocida de Senegal, se
han encontrado conchas en las costas
del Sahara y, probablemente, alguna ha
sido referida en Canarias.
Comentarios: Esta especie tiene unos
caracteres diferenciales muy claros,
como son: las costillas axiales que se
extienden por toda la protoconcha, y el
número elevado de dientes en el labio
externo.
C. tenuisculpta tiene costillas axiales
en la protoconcha, pero tiene una
concha más grande, de color blanco y
con una escultura múy regular.
C. retifera Brugnone, 1880 también
tiene una protoconcha muy similar a
esta especie, aunque más alta, pero la
concha tiene vueltas casi planas, sutura
poco profunda y una coloración de
bandas castañas con costillas axiales
poco prominente y más numerosas.
C. joani spec. nov. se parece superfi-
cialmente, pero se diferencia en que
tiene menos cordones espirales, menos
dientes en la abertura, y sólo tiene costi-
llas axiales en el final de la protoconcha.
Chauvetia robustalba spec. nov. (Figs. 49-52, 75, 152-159, 188)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 153) in MNCN (15.05/47530). Paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
Dakar: 1 c, (Fig. 152) (MNHN); 4 ej, 3 c (10D2-10) (MHNS); 2 ej (10D2-26) (MHNS); Cap Vert: 2 c,
15 m (CJP); 2 j, dragados en la bahía, 20-40 m (MHNS); Delta del Saloum: 2 c, 13° 57' N, 17° 15' W,
50 m (MNHN).
Localidad tipo: Bahía de Dakar, Senegal.
Etimología: El nombre específico proviene de la unión de dos palabras latinas "robusta" y "alba"
que hacen alusión a dos de los caracteres de la concha, su robustez y su coloración.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 49-52, 152,
153) fusiforme, gruesa y corta, sólida,
con unas cinco vueltas de espira y unas
dimensiones de hasta 5,4 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 154-156) con 0,6
vueltas de espira, el núcleo muy ancho
(con 345 |Um) y emergente, con unas 425
ium de altura y unas 475 jUm de anchura.
La escultura está formada por cordonci-
llos espirales, de los que hay unos 15
hacia el final. Los interespacios son irre-
gulares aunque más anchos que los cor-
doncillos y en su interior existen incisio-
nes axiales (Fig. 158). Al final de la pro-
toconcha los cordones y los interespa-
cios suelen tener una anchura similar
(Fig. 157). La escultura axial está
formada por unas cinco o seis costillas
axiales, presentes hacia el final de la
protoconcha.
Teleoconcha con unas 4 vueltas de
espira escasas y escultura formada por
cordones longitudinales y costillas
axiales, algo prosoclinas y que, al cru-
zarse, forman nodulos evidentes (Fig.
159). La escultura espiral se inicia con
dos cordones prácticamente de la misma
anchura y un tercer cordón, en posición
superior, que va apareciendo primero
como un reborde subsutural y luego ya
se puede observar a cierta distancia de
la sutura, pero siendo siempre un poco
más estrecho que los otros dos. En la
última vuelta hay tres cordones por
encima del punto de inserción del labio
externo y que son algo más estrechos
que sus interespacios. Un cuarto cordón
se esboza en posición subsutural. En la
base, hay ocho cordoncillos más que se
van aproximando entre ellos a medida
164
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 152-159. Chauvetia rohustalba spec. nov. 152: paradpo, 5,2 mm (MNHN); 153: holotipo,
4.3 mm (MNCN); 154-156: protoconcha; 157, 158: detalle de la microescultura de la protocon-
cha; 159: detalle de la microescultura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 152-159. Chauvetia robustalba spec. nov. 152: paratype, 5.2 mm (MNHN); 153: holotype,
4.3 mm (MNCN); 154-156: protoconch; 157, 158: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch;
159: detail of the microsculpture ofthe teleoconch.
165
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
que se acercan al canal sifonal, que es
corto y ancho. La última vuelta repre-
senta el 64% de la altura de la concha y
tiene unas quince costillas axiales, algo
más estrechas que sus interespacios.
Abertura (Figs. 75) ligeramente ova-
lada con un canal sifonal corto y algo
inclinado hacia la izquierda. Representa
el 45% de la altura total de la concha. En
el interior del labio externo se aprecian
cinco dientes.
Color de la concha blanco-amari-
llento, pero la protoconcha y el inicio de
la primera vuelta de teleoconcha son de
color rojizo o castaño. También se
pueden observar puntos rojizos irregu-
larmente dispuestos en la superficie de
la concha, preferentemente en la zona
basal y en la última espira.
Dimensiones : el holotipo mide 4,3 x
2,1 mm.
Animal blanquecino, con un tono
crema muy ligero por el dorso. Rádula
(Fig. 188) con numerosas filas de
dientes, el central rectangular con una
cúspide, y los laterales con tres cúspi-
des, curvadas hacia dentro.
Distribución : Sólo conocida de la
Bahía de Dakar.
Comentarios : Por su forma corta,
color claro con puntos rojizos, y proto-
concha elevada con media vuelta de
espira, esta especie no tiene ningún
parecido con otras conocidas. La más
parecida sería C. pardofasciata en sus
formas sin color, pero, precisamente en
estas formas, tiene una protoconcha
blanca o ligeramente violácea, con el
núcleo más pequeño y con menos
vueltas que la de C. robustalba; además
tiene una microescultura en los interes-
pacios entre los cordones espirales.
Chauvetia luciacuestae spec. nov. (Figs. 53-55, 76, 160-168, 183)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 53-55) en MNCN (15.05/47531). Paratipos en las siguientes coleccio-
nes: AMNH (1), BMNH (20080484) (1), MNHN (1), MHNS (4, Fig. 160, y 1 j), CJP (1, 2 j), CJH (1),
CDO (1), CPR (1). Todos estos ejemplares procedentes de la localidad tipo. Otros paratipos: Bañe
Seminóle: 1 ej, 30 m (CJP); Cap Vert: 1 ej, intermareal (CJP); Bahía de Dakar: 8 ej, 30-40 m (MHNS);
11 c (MNHN); 1 c (MNHN, coll. Letellier); dragado en la bahía: 5 ej, 30 m (10D2-26; 10/10/2002)
(MHNS); 4 ej, (10D2-5) (MHNS); 4 j, 20-40 m (MHNS); Bahía de Gorée: 1 c (MNHN).
Otro material estudiado: Senegal, Dakar: 1 c, 1 m (MHNS) (destruida para estudio radular); 1 c
(deterioriada) (MNHN, coll. Denis).
Localidad tipo: Gouye Teni M'Both, Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 10-30 m.
Etimología: Las especie recibe el nombre de Lucia Cuesta, esposa del primer autor, por su cons-
tante colaboración y apoyo.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 53-55, 160)
fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con unas
siete vueltas de espira y una altura
máxima de 9.0 mm.
Protoconcha (Figs. 162-164) con 0,8
vueltas, y con una anchura de unas 675
pm (núcleo: 237 pm, primera media
vuelta: 595 pm) y unas 650 pm de altura;
en ella aparecen unos cincuenta cordo-
nes espirales muy finos, separados por
interespacios de anchura similar (Fig.
165). En los interespacios se observan
las típicas incisiones (Fig. 166) de las
Chauvetia. Hacia el final, hay siete u
ocho costillitas axiales rectas, algo opis-
toclinas. La parte superior de las costi-
llas está curvada sobre una estrecha
repisa subsutural.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de
cordones espirales algo más anchos que
sus interespacios y costillas de anchura
similar a sus interespacios. En el inicio
de la teleoconcha aparecen tres cordones
espirales. En la cuarta vuelta aparece en
la parte superior, bajo la sutura, un
cuarto cordón. En la última vuelta, hay
cuatro cordones por encima de la inser-
ción labial y, hacia la base, aparecen de
doce a catorce cordoncillos más. Los
superiores están claramente separados
por interespacios claros y a medida que
se acercan al canal sifonal se van aproxi-
mando entre ellos, quedando los ocho o
diez más inferiores prácticamente
juntos. La escultura axial es menos rele-
vante y está formada por costillas verti-
lóó
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 160-168. Chauvetia luciacuestae spec. nov. 160: paraupo, 7,9 mm (MHNS); 161: detalle
de la abertura; 162-164: protoconcha; 165, 166; detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha;
167: detalle de la microescultura de la teleoconcha; 168: opérculo.
Figures 160-168. Chauvetia luciacuestae spec. nov. 160: paratype, 7.9 mm (MHNS); 161: detail of
the aperture ; 162-164: protoconch; 165, 166: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch; 167: detail
ofthe microsculpture ofthe teleoconch; 168: operculum.
1 67
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
cales o un poco inclinadas, de forma
irregular, siendo unas dieciocho en la
última vuelta. Se prolongan por debajo
de la inserción labial acabando cerca del
inicio del canal sifonal. Al cruzarse cor-
dones y costillas se forman nodulos
redondeados. No hay microescultura
alguna (Fig. 167). La ultima espira
ocupa el 53 % de la altura total de la
concha.
Abertura (Figs. 76, 161) oval, que
alcanza el 38% de la altura de la concha.
En el interior del labio externo se apre-
cian cinco dientes, de los que el superior
es más pronunciado y el inferior consti-
tuye el borde externo del canal sifonal.
Color de la concha blanco-leche de
fondo, sobre el que aparecen los
nodulos del cruce de cordones y costi-
llas que son de color castaño rojizo.
Dimensiones : el holotipo mide 8,8 x
3,0 mm.
Animal totalmente blanco leche con
opérculo amarillento. Opérculo (Figs.
168, 183) ovoide, núcleo subterminal; en
el interior, inserción ovoide, casi circu-
lar.
Distribución: Sólo conocida de la
Bahía de Dakar, viviendo en fondos are-
nosos de alrededor de 30 m.
Comentarios: El peculiar patrón de
coloración permite distinguirla de otras
Chauvetia de similar tamaño que hay en
la zona como C. candidissima o C. tenuis-
cul-pta.
Fuera del área de estudio, se podría
confundir con C. lefebvrei (Maravigna,
1840), que existe en las costas atlánticas
de Marruecos así como en las costas
africanas mediterráneas y en algunas
localidades europeas del Mediterráneo
occidental (Horro y Rolán, 2004). C.
lefebvrei es bastante variable si la consi-
deramos en toda su área de distribu-
ción, pero no lo es a escala local: los
ejemplares estudiados de las costas
argelinas son de menor tamaño y más
ovales que los de las conchas atlánticas.
Estas conchas pueden presentar el típico
color a manchones o bien ser de color
uniforme, en este caso muy parecidas a
C. retifera (Reeve, 1845) y confundibles si
no se comparan sus protoconchas. En
cualquier caso la forma atlántica de C.
lefebvrei es proporcionalmente más
ancha y maciza, sus costillas son más
anchas y están más juntas, y sus
nodulos de cruzamiento más planos y
rectangulares que los de la especie de
Senegal.
Chauvetia multilirata spec. nov. (Figs. 56, 57, 77, 169-172)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 56, 57, 169) en el MNCN (15.05/47532).
Localidad tipo: Cap Vert (09/ 1945) Dakar, Senegal.
Etimología: El nombre específico alude al elevado número de cordones espirales de la concha, un
carácter diferencial muy peculiar en esta especie.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 56, 57,
169) fusiforme, poco alargada, sólida,
ancha, con unas cinco vueltas de espira
y 5.8 mm de altura.
Protoconcha (Fig. 170, 171) con 0,8
de vuelta, poco elevada, con una
anchura de 690 jum (núcleo: 300 p;
primera media vuelta: 515 jUm) alcan-
zando una altura de 380 jum. En el ejem-
plar estudiado está ligeramente desgas-
tada pero se puede observar la existen-
cia de débiles estrías estrechas, muy
numerosas (Fig. 172). Presenta seis o
siete costillas curvadas que aumentan
progresivamente de anchura. La transi-
ción con la teleoconcha no es muy clara
y se considera como tal el momento en
el que van apareciendo los cordones
espirales de la teleoconcha.
Teleoconcha con un perfil de las
vueltas plano o ligeramente convexo.
Sutura no ondulada poco profunda.
Está ornamentada con cordones espira-
les y costillas, ambos de anchura clara-
mente mayor que sus interespacios, y
que casi están ocultos al formarse en' su
cruce unos nodulos grandes y rectangu-
lares. En las dos primeras vueltas hay
cuatro cordones, de los que el superior
forma el reborde subsutural. En la
168
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 169-172. Chauvetia multilirata spec. nov. 169: holotipo, 5,8 mm (MNCN); 170, 171:
protoconcha; 172; detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 169-172. Chauvetia multilirata spec. nov. 169: holotype, 5.8 mm (MNCN); 170, 171: proto-
conch; 172; detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
169
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
penúltima vuelta, ya aparecen seis cor-
dones, de los que los dos superiores son
un poco más estrechos. En la última
vuelta, hay seis cordones, apareciendo
un séptimo muy fino sobre la sutura: los
dos o tres superiores están muy juntos y
son más pequeños, distinguiéndose con
dificultad. En la base de la concha hay
de diez a doce cordones más. Las costi-
llas axiales son algo curvadas y prosocli-
nas. En la última vuelta, que representa
el 60% de la altura total de la concha,
hay una veintena de costillas.
Abertura (Figs. 77) oval, alcanza el
40% de la altura total. Canal sifonal
corto y ancho.
Dimensiones : el holotipo mide 5,8 x
2,4 mm.
Color de la concha blanco sucio, con
zonas ligeramente crema.
Distribución: Sólo conocida por el
holotipo.
Comentarios: La protoconcha parece
ser uno de los rasgos distintivos más
característicos de esta especie, al ser
corta, ancha y con escultura espiral muy
fina. Los otros son: el número elevado
de cordones espirales y los nodulos rec-
tangulares grandes.
En el área estudiada, por su color,
puede recordar a juveniles de C. tenuis-
culpta y con C. candidissima, de los que se
diferencia porque su abertura es clara-
mente de una concha adulta. Además,
C. candidissima se diferencia por menor
número de costillas axiales y cordones
espirales con interespacios más anchos,
protoconcha más elevada y menos
ancha. C. tenuisculpta, además, tiene una
escultura axial en su protoconcha muy
marcada.
Fuera del área de estudio podría re-
cordar a una pequeña C. lefebvrei albina,
pero se distinguiría por el mayor número
de los cordones espirales y porque su
protoconcha es menos elevada.
Otras especies de color blanco, como
C. robustalba spec. nov. o ejemplares
blancos de C. pardofasciata, tienen menor
número de cordones, los nodulos son
más pequeños y la protoconcha más
elevada y de color castaño.
Chauvetia pardacuta spec. nov. (Figs. 58, 59, 78, 173-180)
Chauvetia sp. 2. Micali, 1999. Boíl. Malac., 34: 66, fig. 10.
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 173) en MNCN (25.05 / 47533), paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
AMNH (1), BMNH (20080485) (1), MNHN (1, Fig. 174), MHNS (4), USNM (1), CJH (1), CDO (1),
CPR (1). Otros paratipos: Charbonier: 2 c, 34 m, (CJP).
Localidad tipo: N'Gor, 1-4 m, Dakar, Senegal (01/1984).
Etimología: El nombre específico alude a dos caracteres de la especie: su color y la forma puntia-
guda de la concha.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 58, 59, 173,
174) fusiforme, con la espira muy alar-
gada, sólida, con unas siete vueltas de
espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 176, 177) con 0,8
de vuelta tiene 600 jtím de anchura
(núcleo: 320 jum; primera media vuelta:
480 jum) y 540 jum de altura. Presenta
cordones longitudinales de anchura
variable algo más anchos que sus
interespacios, los cuales presentan las
típicas incisiones axiales características
del género (Fig. 178). Al final de la pro-
toconcha se pueden observar una vein-
tena de cordoncillos que cabalgan sobre
las costillas axiales, que son unas ocho,
bastante ortoclinas, que van ganando en
anchura hacia el final y que se curvan
por arriba sobre una estrecha repisa.
Teleoconcha con cordones espirales
algo más anchos que sus interespacios
(Fig. 179). En la primera vuelta hay tres
cordones de una anchura similar, por en-
cima de ellos, y un cuarto cordón se intu-
ye en el reborde subsutural. En la segun-
da vuelta, este cordón ya es visible pero
más estrecho que los tres inferiores. En la
tercera vuelta hay cinco cordones, los
dos superiores más estrechos (la mitad
aproximadamente) que los tres inferio-
170
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 173-180. Chauvetia pardacuta spec. nov. 173: holodpo, 6,4 mm (MNCN); 174: paratipo,
6.3 mm (MNHN); detalle de la abertura; 176, 177: protoconcha; 178; detalle de la microescultura
de la protoconcha; 179: escultura de la teleoconcha; 180: detalle de la microescultura de la teleo-
concha.
Figures 173-180. Chauvetia pardacuta spec. nov. 173: holotype, 6.4 mm (MNCN); 174: paratype,
6.3 mm (MNHN); detail ofthe aperture; 176, 177: protoconch; 178; detail ofthe microsculpture of
the protoconch; 179: sculpture ofthe teleoconch; 180: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe teleoconch.
171
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
res. Esta proporción se mantiene hasta la
última vuelta, en la que se aprecian estos
cinco cordones por encima de la inser-
ción labial, pero que pueden llegar a ser
seis o siete. En la parte basal, hay unos
once cordoncillos que se van aproximan-
do entre sí conforme se acercan al canal
sifonal. Las costillas axiales son poco ele-
vadas y tienen una anchura similar a sus
interespacios. Al cruzarse con los cordo-
nes forman nodulos redondeados. Con
grandes aumentos (Fig. 180) se puede
apreciar la existencia de estriación espi-
ral en toda la superficie. La última vuelta
representa el 50% de la altura total.
Abertura (Figs. 78, 175) oval que
supone el 34 % de la altura de la concha.
En el interior del labio externo se obser-
van siete pliegues dentarios. Canal
sifonal corto y muy abierto, poco evi-
dente.
Color de la concha castaño oscuro
bastante uniforme.
COMENTARIOS FINALES
Se han estudiado unas 3000 conchas
y ejemplares del género Chauvetia de la
zona de Senegal, donde, en total, se han
encontrado 14 especies.
De estas especies, 4 pudieron ser
asignadas a nombres que ya eran pre-
viamente conocidos: C. soni, C. affinis, C.
tenuisculpta y C. lamyi, especies que ya
eran conocidas del área de Senegal de
donde fueron descritas.
El resto de las especies (nada menos
que 10) resultaron ser nuevas para la
ciencia. Esto supone que, en total, se
considera que existen en el área de
Dakar al menos 14 especies, lo que
resulta un número sorprendentemente
elevado. Flay que recordar, que la zona
se ha considerado una "casi-isla" debido
al aislamiento que presentan sus hábi-
tats rocosos rodeados por grandes
extensiones de fondos arenosos tanto
hacia el norte como hacia el sur. Por este
motivo se ha comportado como un área
adecuada para la especiación (como una
isla) y por ese motivo se han originado
multitud de endemismos, lo que ya ha
sido mencionado para otros grupos de
Dimensiones: el holotipo mide 6,4 x
2,6 mm
Animal desconocido.
Distribución : Sólo conocida de la
zona de N'Gor del área de Dakar,
Senegal.
Comentarios: Chauvetia joani spec.
nov. se diferencia porque tiene la sutura
más pronunciada, los cordones espirales
son más sobresalientes, excepto los sub-
suturales, que son muy atenuados, y las
costillas axiales están presentes en
menor número. Además, el núcleo de la
protoconcha es más pequeño y el
número de costillas axiales al final de la
misma es algo menor.
C. tenebrosa spec. nov. es más
pequeña, con menos vueltas de espira,
con menos costillas axiales, protoconcha
más pequeña, también con menos cor-
doncillos espirales y también menos
costillas axiales en la proximidad de la
teleoconcha.
moluscos, como Conidae, Rissoidea,
Turridae, etc.
El género Chauvetia es conocido de
una extensión relativamente reducida:
Mediterráneo, Canarias, costa oeste afri-
cana (Marruecos, Sahara y Mauritania)
y Senegal. Alguna especie se ha exten-
dido al Atlántico ibérico y alguna
aislada se ha encontrado en las islas Bri-
tánicas y norte de Francia. Curiosa-
mente, en alguna de estas áreas (Medite-
rráneo, Dakar y Canarias) existe un alto
índice de endemicidad.
Por debajo de la zona mencionada no
se conocen especies de este género, con la
excepción de un único ejemplar, proba-
blemente perteneciente a Chauvetia (dato
no publicado), recolectado en la isla de
Sao Tomé, que ha sido estudiado por los
autores, y que parece ser una verdadera
especie de este género. Por supuesto, no
tiene que ver con ejemplares del género
Pradoxa Rolán y Fernandes, 1990, qüe
pertenecen a Muricidae, y que, frecuente-
mente se han confundido con especies de
Chauvetia, debido a las características
morfológicas de su concha.
172
Oliver Y RoláN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Figuras 181-184. Opérculos: 181: Chauvetia affinis, Dakar; 182: Chauvetia jo ani, Dakar; 183:
Chauvetia luciacuestae, Dakar; 184: Chauvetia tenuisculpta, Dakar. Figuras 185-189. Rádulas de
Chauvetia. 185: Chauvetia tenuisculpta-, 186: Chauvetia lamyi-, 187: Chauvetia joani-, 188: Chauve-
tia robustalha-, 189: Chauvetia affinis.
Figures 181-184. Opercula: 181: Chauvetia affinis, Dakar; 182: Chauvetia joani, Dakar; 183:
Chauvetia luciacuestae, Dakar; 184: Chauvetia tenuisculpta, Dakar. Figuras 185-189. Radulae of
Chauvetia. 185: Chauvetia tenuisculpta; 186: Chauvetia lamyi; 187: Chauvetia joani; 188: Chau-
vetia robustalha; 189: Chauvetia affinis.
173
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
En el presente trabajo se han estu-
diado de forma especial algunos caracte-
res del género, como los de la protocon-
cha, que es muy característica: siempre
paucispiral y generalmente muy ancha.
En esta protoconcha, en pocos casos
existe una escultura axial extendida a
toda ella (como en C. tenuisculpta y en C.
javieri ); casi siempre esta escultura está
reducida a unas pocas costillas en la
zona de transición con la teleoconcha, en
número variable, aunque en algunas es-
pecies el número de costillas puede ser
muy escaso, como ocurre en C. candidis-
sima, C. joani, C. pelorcei y C. pardofasciata ;
también a veces hay otros caracteres di-
ferenciales de la protoconcha, como ser
muy globosa (en el caso de C. robustalba )
o algo aplanada (como en C. multilirata).
La escultura espiral de la protocon-
cha está formada por cordoncillos de
forma casi constante, aunque algunas
especies apenas los tienen, como ocurre
en C. multilirata, C. candidissima. En
cuanto a la escultura entre los cordones,
esta formada casi siempre por estrías o
cordoncillos en sentido axial, aunque en
algunas ocasiones, esta escultura es difí-
cilmente apreciable, como ocurre en C.
tenebrosa o C. pelorcei.
La rádula fue estudiada en algunas
especies, y observamos que, dentro de
un patrón general similar, hay diferen-
cias entre unas a otras, aunque la difi-
cultad está en poder apreciar la variabi-
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Adanson, M., 1757. Histoire Naturelle du Séné-
gal, Coquillages. Bauche, Paris. 190 pp, 19
láms.
Bandel, K., 1977. Neogastropod radulae from
Banyus-sur-Mer. Vie et Milieu, 27 (2), sér. A:
191-232.
Bruguiére, J. G., 1789. Encyclopedie méthodique
ou par ordre de matiéres. Histoire Naturelle des
vers, des mollusques. Vol. 1: 344 pp.
CLEMAM (http:/ / www.somali.asso.fr /ele-
mam/ index.clemam.html)
Dautzenberg, P., 1891. Voyage de la Goélette
"Melita" aux Canaries et au Sénégal 1889-
1890. Mollusques Testacés. Mémoires de la So-
ciété Zoologique de France, 4: 16-65, lám. 3.
lidad intraespecífica, para lo que sería
preciso haber realizando un cierto
número de estudios radulares para cada
una de las especies, lo que representa
una notable dificultad dada la pequeñez
de la rádula, y la relativa escasez de
material recolectado vivo.
El opérculo mostró ser ovoide, con
un núcleo subcentral o casi terminal.
Pero también haría falta el estudio de
una cierta cantidad de ejemplares para
poder conocer la variabilidad.
Al mismo tiempo que el presente
trabajo, se ha iniciado una revisión de
las especies del Mediterráneo, así como
el estudio de las especies de profundi-
dad del área de Sahara-Mauritania y de
las especies de Canarias.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
A las personas que cedieron material
e información para el presente estudio:
Jacques Pelorce, José María Hernández
y Franck Boyer. A Jesús Méndez del
Centro de Apoyo Científico y Tecnoló-
gico a la Investigación (CACTI) de la
Universidad de Vigo por las fotografías
al Microscopio Electrónico de Barrido. A
Jesús S. Troncoso del Dep. de Zoología,
y a Emilio Rolán-Álvarez del Dep. de
Genética, por permitir el uso de sus apa-
ratos de fotografía óptica para las foto-
grafías a color.
Dautzenberg, P., 1910. Contribution á la faune
malacologique de l'Afrique occidentale. Ac-
tes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 64: 1-
174.
Dautzenberg, P., 1912. Mission Gruvel sur la
cote occidentale d' Afrique (1909-1910). Mo-
llusque marins. Armales de l'Institut Oceano-
graphicque. 5 (3): 1-111.
Fischer-Piette, E., 1942. Les Mollusques d'A-
danson. Journal de Conchuliolovie, 85: 103-367,
láms. 1-75.
Fischer-Piette, E. y Nicklés, M., 1946. Mo-
llusques nouveaux ou peu connus des cotes
de l'Afrique occidentale. Journal de Conchy-
liologie, 87, fase. 2: 45-81, lám. 1.
174
Oliver Y ROLAN: El género Chauvetia en Senegal, con la descripción de diez especies
Fretter V. y Graham A., 1984. Prosobranch
Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 8. Ne-
ogastropoda. Journal of Molluscan Studies.
London, Supplement 15: 435-556.
Knudsen, J., 1956. Marine prosobranchs of Tro-
pical West Africa (Stenoglossa). Atlantide Re-
port , 4: 8-110, 4 láms.
Hergueta, H., Luque, A. y Templado, J., 2002.
On the taxonomy and biology of Chauvetia
mamillata (Risso, 1826) (Gastropoda: Bucci-
nidae) in south East Spain. Bollettino Mala-
cologico. Supplemento 4.135-146.
Horro, J. y Rolán, E., 2004. Las especies de
Chauvetia de Galicia (Mollusca, Muricoidea).
Noticiario SEM, 41: 27-30.
Luque del Villar, A. A., 1984. Contribución
al conocimiento de los moluscos gasterópodos
de las costas de Málaga y Granada. Tesis Doc-
toral, Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
695 pp.
Monterosato, T. di M., 1889. Coquilles mari-
nes Marocaines. Journal de Conchyliologie, 37:
20-40, 112-121.
Micali, P., 1999 "1998". Note sulle specie di
Chauvetia delT Atlántico nord-orientale. Bo-
llettino Malacologico, 34 (5-8): 53-68.
Mifsud, C., 1994. Alcuni molluschi vivi dalle ac-
que di Malta. La Conchiglia, 26 (272): 29-36.
Nicklés, M., 1947. La collection de Molluscjues tes-
tacés marins de l'I.F.A.N. Institut Franjáis d'A-
frique Noire, Catalogues, 1, 23 pp.
Nicklés, M., 1950. Molusques testacés marins de
la cote occidentale d' Afrique. Paul Lechevalier,
Paris. 269 pp.
Nordsieck, F., 1976. Familia Buccinidae. II ge-
nere Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884 nei mari
d'Europa. La Conchiglia, 8 (89-90): 3-7.
Pasteur-Humbert, C., 1962. Les mollusques
marins testacés du Maroc. Travaux de l'Insti-
tut Scientifique Chérifien, ser. Zoologie, 23: 1-245.
Philippi, R. A., 1836. Enumerado molluscorum
Siciliae cum viventium tum in tellure tertia-
ria fossilium, quae in itinere suo observavit.
Vol. 1. Schropp, Berlin [Berolinil, xiv + 267
pp, láms. 1-12
Thiele,, J., 1929. Handbuch der Systematischen
Weichtierkunde. Vol. 1. Jena, Gustav Fischer,
376 pp.
Thiriot-Quiévreux, C. y Rodríguez Babío, C.,
1975. Etude des protoconques de quelques
Prosobranches de la région de Roscoff. Cahiers
de Biologie Marine, 16: 136-148.
175
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas , 26 (2): 177-183, 2008
Fusinus buzzurroi (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae), a new spe-
cies from Croatian coasts
Fusinus buzzurroi (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae), una nueva especie de
las costas croatas
Jakov PRKIC* and Paolo RUSSO**
Recibido el 1 l-VIII-2008. Aceptado el 13-X-2008
ABSTRACT
A new species of Fusinus from Croatian coasts of Dalmatia is described and figured. Type
material was collected off Mljet Island, Croatia, at depths of 60 to 100 m in association
with Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758), but the species was also recorded from other
localities along Dalmatian coasts at different habitats and bathymetrical ranges.
RESUMEN
Se describe y figura una nueva especie de Fusinus procedente de la costa dálmata de Croacia.
El material tipo se recolectó frente a la isla de Mljet, Croacia, en profundidades de 60 a
100 m asociado con Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758), pero la especie se encontró
también en otras localidades de la costa dálmata, en habitats y profundidades distintos.
KEY WORDS: Gastropoda, Fasciolariidae, Fusinus buzzurroi , new species, Mediterranean Sea, recent.
PALABRAS CLAVE: Gastropoda, Fasciolariidae, Fusinus buzzurroi , nueva especie, Mediterráneo, reciente.
INTRODUCTION
The family Fasciolariidae J. E. Gray,
1853 is represented in the Mediter-
ranean by two genera, Fasciolaria
Lamarck, 1799 and Fusinus Rafinesque,
1815, belonging to the subfamilies Fasci-
olariinae J. E. Gray, 1853, and Fusininae
Wrigley, 1927, respectively. Some speci-
mens ascribable to Fusinus are com-
monly found along the Dalmatian
coasts; our samplings pointed out the
presence of several individuáis of a
peculiar Fusinus , collected in association
with Corallium rubrum (Linnaeus, 1758)
at different depths, depending on the
locality: 60 to 100 m off the islands of
Mljet, Lastovo and Susac, 35 to 60 m off
Molat, Sestrunj, Skarda and Premuda, 80
to 90 m off Zirje. This fasciolarid also
occurs in other habitats, being observed
off Rivanj Island at a depth of 20 m
living on rocky bottoms rich in gorgoni-
ans, associated with the bryozoan
Reteporella beaniana (King, 1846) (Alen
Petani, Zadar, pers. comm.). An accurate
investigation of shell morphology of
these specimens revealed that we are in
the presence of a species new to Science.
The methods for the evaluation of pro-
toconch whorls follow Aartsen and
Verduin (1978).
* Getaldiceva 11, 21000 Split, Croatia.
** Giudecca 459, 30133 Venezia, Italy.
177
Iberus, 26 (2), 2008
Abbreviations:
CGB Collection Giovanni Buzzurro,
Biassono, Milán, Italy
CJP Collection Jakov Prkic, Split,
Croatia
CPR Collection Paolo Russo, Venice,
Italy
MNHM Museo di Storia Naturale di
Milano, Milán, Italy
d= diameter
h = height
SYSTEMATICS
Family Fasciolariidae j. E. Cray, 1853
Subfamily Fusininae Wrigley, 1927
Genus Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815
Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp. (Figs. 1-3)
Type material: The holotype MNHM Mo 33638 is housed at Collezione Malacologica del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (MNHM), Italy. The paratypes are the following: paratype A,
21.8 x 10.4 mm (CPR); paratype B, 21.4 x 10.7 mm (CPR); paratype C, 19.8 x 8.6 mm (CPR); paratype
D, 18.4 x 8.9 mm (CPR); paratype E, 17.4 x 8.3 mm (CPR); paratype F, 22.4 x 10.2 mm (CJP); paratype
G, 21.0 x 9.8 mm (QP); paratype H, 19.4 x 8.7 mm (QP); paratype I, 20.5 x 9.6 mm (QP); paratype
J, 17.5 x 7.8 mm (QP); paratype K, 16.2 x 7.5 mm (CJP); paratype L, 17.4 x 8.2 mm (CGB); paratype
M, 17.7 x 7.9 mm (CGB); paratype N, 19.0 x 8.4 mm (CGB); paratype O, 16.8 x 7.9 mm (CGB); all
from the type locality.
Other material examined: About twenty specimens from the islands of Lastovo, Molat and Zirje
(Dalmatia, Croatia).
Locus typicus: Mljet Island, Dalmatia (Croatia), in association with Corallium rubrum, at depths of
60 to 100 m.
Derivatio nominis: This species is named after our unforgettable and unforgotten friend Giovanni
Buzzurro.
Description : Shell solid and fusiform,
consisting of 1.3-1. 4 protoconch whorls
and 6-7 teleoconch whorls, rather small
for genus, measuring up to 26.4 x 11.7
mm, usually from 16 to 22 mm in height.
Protoconch brownish, mandílate,
striated by 6 obvious, equidistant spiral
threads, with interspaces completely
smooth, about 755 pm in diameter, with
an apical nucleus measuring 252 pm
across (Fig. 2).
Teleoconch whorls convex, slightly
carinated by an obvious, but not very
raised, keel, separated by well-marked,
but not canaliculated sutures. The sculp-
ture consists of strong, raised and well-
spaced axial ribs, 6-7 on each whorl,
rarely 8, and closely spaced primary
spiral cords, which are stronger where
they pass over the axial ribs. The spiral
sculpture also consists of secondary
threads, which are more evident on the
last two or three whorls.
The body whorl represents 60-64 %
of the total shell height. Aperture oval,
outer lip varicose, internally lirate with
7-10 elongate teeth, columellar callus
thin, but obvious. A parietal tooth is
well evident in the upper part of aper-
ture. Some studied specimens show two
or three columellar folds, more or less
evident, which are caused by the under-
lying primary spiral cords, at the base of
the columella. Siphonal canal short,
broad and curved, slightly deviating to
the left when seen in apertural view.
Operculum corneous, brown in colour,
with an apical nucleus.
The shell colour varies, usually is
brownish, rarely whitish or palé beige,
with spiral cords only slightly darker
than the background colour, sometimos
with a whitish keel. In some studied
specimens the spiral cords are dark
brown or reddish-brown, conspicuously
darker than the background colour.
178
PRKlC AND RUSSO: Fusinus buzzurroi , a new species from Croatian coasts
Figure 1. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp., Mljet Island (Croada), 60-100 m. A-C: holotype (MNHM Mo
33638), apertural, lateral and dorsal views, 26.4 x 11.7 mm; D: paratype A, apertural view, 21.8 x
10.4 mm; E: paratype I, apertural view, 20.3 x 9.6 mm; F: paratype D, dorsal view, 18.4 x 8.9
mm; G: paratype F, apertural view, 22.4 x 10.2 mm; H, I: paratype B, apertural and dorsal views,
21.4 x 10.7 mm.
Figura 1. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp., Mljet Island (Croacia), 60-100 m. A-C:, holotipo (MNHM Mo
33638), vista apertural, lateral y dorsal, 26,4 x 11,7 mm; D: paratipo A, vista apertural, 21,8 x 10,4
mm; E: paratipo I, vista apertural, 20,5 x 9,6 mm; F: paratipo D, vista dorsal, 18,4 x 8,9 mm; G:
paratipo F, vista apertural, 22,4 x 10,2 mm; H-I: paratipo B, vista apertural y dorsal, 21,4 x 10,7
mm.
179
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Figure 2. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp., Mljet Island (Croada), 60-100 m, protoconch.
Figura 2. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp., Mljet Island (Croacia), 60-100 m, protoconcha.
FFolotype (Figs. 1 A-1C) coloured palé
beige, slightly darker between the axial
ribs, consisting of 8.3 whorls, 1.3-1. 4 of
which belonging to the protoconch. There
are 6 axial ribs on the body whorl, and 6-
7 on the preceding whorls. There are 3
primary spiral cords on the first teleoconch
whorl, 4 on the second and third whorls,
6 on the fourth to sixth whorls and 16 to
17 on the body whorl, the later ones reach-
ing the base of siphonal canal. Secondary
spiral cords are evident especially on the
last two whorls, as well as along the
siphonal canal. The body whorl represents
59.8% of the total shell height.
Geographic distribution : This species
is presently known from the Croatian
DISCUSSION
According to the recent revisions of
Mediterranean species of the genus
(Buzzurro and Russo, 2007, 2008), 15
species of Fusinus are known for the
Mediterranean Sea:
F. alternatus Buzzurro and Russo,
2007 ex Settepassi
F. cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008
(a replacement ñame for Fusus crassus
Pallary, 1901)
F. dimassai Buzzurro and Russo, 2007
F dimitrii Buzzurro and Ovalis, 2007
coasts, its northern limit being represen-
ted by Premuda Island, and Southern
limit by Mljet Island.
Habitat : All the examined material was
collected in association with Corallium
rubrum, at depths of 35 to 100 m. F. buz-
zurroi is consistently found in the mater-
ial collected by Dalmatian coral fishermen;
it is more rarely recorded from rocky
bottoms lacking red coral. At least one
specimeri was observed living in associa-
tion with Reteporella beaniana (off Rivanj
Island at a depth of 20 m), a bryozoan fre-
quently associated with coralligenous
assemblages. Our data suggest that this
species does not live on either detritic or
shallow rocky bottoms (0 to 15 m).
F. eviae Buzzurro and Russo, 2007
F. labronicus (Monterosato, 1884)
F. margaritae Buzzurro and Russo,
2007
F. parvulus (Monterosato, 1884)
F. profetai Nofroni, 1982
F pulchellus (Philippi, 1844)
F. rolani Buzzurro and Ovalis, 2004.
F. rostratus (Olivi, 1792)
F. rusticulus (Monterosato, 1880)
F. syracusanus (Linnaeus, 1758)
F verrucosus (Gmelin, 1791)
180
PrkiÓ AND RUSSO: Fusinus buzzurroi , a new species from Croatian coasts
Figure 3. A. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp. 21.4 x 10.2 mm. B. Fusinus dimitrii Buzzurro and Ovalis,
2007 17.8 x 7.4 mm. C. Fusinus rostratus (Olivi, 1792) 43.8 x 16.6 mm. D. Fusinus parvulus
(Monterosato, 1884) 13,4 x 7,4 mm.
Figura 3. A. Fusinus buzzurroi n. sp. 21,4 x 10,2 mm. B. Fusinus dimitrii Buzzurro and Ovalis,
2007 17,8 x 7,4 mm. C. Fusinus rostratus (Olivi, 1792) 43,8 x 16,6 mm. D. Fusinus parvulus
(Monterosato, 1884) 13,4 x 7,4 mm.
F. rostratus, F. syracusanus and F. buz-
zurroi surely occur along the Dalmatian
coasts. Recent investigations cali into
question the occurrence of two other
species recorded from Dalmatia (F. pul-
chellus and F. parvulus), and no specimen
has been recorded during the many years
of research in this area by one of the
authors (J. Prkic). The record of F. pulchel-
lus in association with "corallo nobile"
(C. rubrum) reported by Brusina (1866) is
probably to be reinterpreted as a
misidentification of the new species here
described. The same goes for the record
of F parvulus, in that it may be confused
with F. buzzurroi at some growth stages.
Fusinus buzzurroi can be compared to
F. rostratus (Olivi, 1792), F. dimitrii Buz-
zurro and Ovalis, 2007, and F. parvulus
(Monterosato, 1884) (see Figure 3). Con-
chometrical parameters (Table I) are
reported for each species (following
Buzzurro and Russo, 2007).
F. buzzurroi differs from F. rostratus
(Fig. 3C) for the much smaller size, the
stubbier shape, the smaller protoconch
(755 jum against 910 jum of North-Adri-
atic populations of F. rostratus). In F. ros-
tratus the axial ribs start just after the
suture in the adapical part (Buzzurro
and Russo, 2007), while in F. buzzurroi
they begin intersecting the ribs of the
next whorl in the sutural area. F. rostratus
shows a much longer siphonal canal. In F.
rostratus there are some populations
having a slight keel, others a well-devel-
oped keel, while others are quite acarí-
ñate (Bombace, 1971); F. buzzurroi has
always a slight keel. In F. buzzurroi the
average of conchometrical parameters
h/d has a valué of 2.14 against 2.65 in F.
rostratus (Table I). In F. rostratus the
habitat is more diversified, ranging from
circalittoral (Vio and De Min, 1994) to
bathyal mud and white coral biocoenoses
(Dieuzeide, 1950; Carpine, 1965;
Bombace, 1969), extending to a depth of
823 meters (D'Amico, 1912). Records in
association with red coral were never
reported from Dalmatian coasts.
F. buzzurroi differs from F. dimitrii
(Fig. 3B) in the larger size, the less elon-
181
Iberus , 26 (2), 2008
Table I. Conchometrical parameters in Fusinus buzzurroi, F. rostratus , F dimitrii and F parvulus (h
and d in mm).
Tabla I. Parámetros de la concha en Fusinus buzzurroi, F. rostratus, F. dimitrii y F. parvulus (h y d en
mm).
gated profile, the lower number of axial
ribs (numbering 8-9 in F. dimitrii against
6-7 in F. buzzurroi on the body whorl), the
keel (always absent in F. dimitrii), the
axial ribs broader and more prominent
with wider interspaces, the presence of
an obvious secondary spiral sculpture. F
buzzurroi has a shorter and more widely
open siphonal canal; the protoconch is
marked by 6 spiral threads, while it
appears to be smooth in F. dimitrii; the
operculum is brown in colour, being yel-
lowish in F. dimitrii. With respect to con-
chometrical parameters, in F. dimitrii the
average of h/d has a valué of 2.49 against
2.14 in F. buzzurroi. Habitat is similar.
F. buzzurroi differs from F. parvulus
(Fig. 3D) in the stouter and heavier
shell, the number of axial ribs, (6-7 in F.
buzzurroi and 8-9 in F. parvulus ), the
presence of secondary spiral cords and a
keel, always absent in F. parvulus, the
suture which is more marked in F.
parvulus, the spire whorls more flattened
in F. parvulus, the colour always uniform
in F. parvulus, while in F. buzzurroi only
the juveniles can be uniformly coloured,
sometimes having spiral cords darker
than background colour, the protoconch
more raised in F. parvulus, more
rounded in F. buzzurroi. Habitats and
distributional ranges are different. Con-
chometrical parameters are similar.
ACKN O WLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Dr. M. Cretella for
the critical revisión and the friendly
helpfulness in translating the text into
English, and Dr. M. Zilioli (MNHM) for
taking SEM micrographs.
182
PRKlé AND RUSSO: Fusinus buzzurroi , a new species from Croatian coasts
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aartsen, J. J. and Verduin, A., 1978. On the
conchological identification of Cingula (Setia)
fusca (Philippi, 1841), C. (S.) turricolata (Mon-
terosato, 1884) and C. (S.) inflata (Monterosato,
1884), marine gastropods from the Mediter-
ranean. Basteria, 42: 27-47.
Bombace, G., 1969. Appunti sulla malacofauna e
suifondali circalitorali della penisola di Milazzo.
Suppl. al Bollettino d'Informazione Sicil-
camere. Unione delle Camere di Commercio,
Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura della Re-
gione Siciliana, Palermo, 56 pp., 17 pls.
Bombace, G., 1971. Notizie preliminari sulla
sistemática, sulla ecologia e sulla dis-
tribuzione delle forme carénate ed acarenate
di Fusinus rostratus (Olivi) in Mediterráneo.
Annali del Museo Cívico di Storia Naturale “Gi-
acomo Doria", 78: 228-246.
Brusina, S., 1866. Contribuzione pella fauna dei
molluschi dalmati. Verhandlungen der Kaiser-
lich-kóniglichen zoologisch-botanischen
Gesellschaft in Wien, 16: 1-134.
Buzzurro, G. and Russo, P., 2007. Fusinus del
Mediterraneo/Mediterranean Fusinus. Published
by the authors. Milano, 280 pp., 30 pls.
Carpine, C., 1965. Quelques observations sur
la faune bathyale dans le Canal de Corsé.
Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Réunions, Com-
mission Internationale pour l'Exploration Sci-
entifique de la Mer Méditerranée, 18 (2): 83.
Dieuzeide, R., 1950. La faune du fond cha-
lutable de la Baie de Castiglione. Station d'Ac-
quiculture et de Peche de Castiglione, Nouv.
Serie, 2: 9-86.
Vio, E. and De Min, R., 1994. I molluschi
conchiferi della riserva marina di Miramare
(Trieste). Bollettino della Societa Adriatica di
Scienze, 75 (2): 465-482.
183
NORMAS DE PUBLICACION
• La revista lberus publica artículos de fondo, notas y monografías que versen sobre cualquiera de los aspectos
relacionados con la Malacología. Se entiende por artículo un trabajo de investigación de más de 5 páginas de
texto, incluidas láminas, gráficos y tablas. Las notas son trabajos de menor extensión. Las monografías son tra-
bajos sobre un tema único, de extensión superior a las 50 páginas de la revista y que serán publicadas, si
procede, como un suplemento de lberus. Los autores interesados en publicar monografías deberán ponerse
previamente en contacto con el Editor de Publicaciones. Se entiende que el contenido de los manuscritos no ha
sido publicado, ni enviado simultáneamente a otra revista para su consideración.
• Los manuscritos, así como toda la correspondencia relacionada con los mismos, deberán ser remitidos a:
Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de
Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España y /o al correo electrónico <sgofas@uma.es>.
• El texto del trabajo podrá estar redactado en español, inglés, italiano, francés o portugués.
• Los artículos, notas y monografías deberán presentarse sobre DIN A-4, por una sola cara a doble espacio
(incluyendo referencias, pies de figura y tablas), con al menos 3 centímetros de margen por cada lado. Los tra-
bajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias) y se incluirá una versión en un CD, o bien remitida
por correo electrónico, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones de corrientes de Windows (pero no
en el formato .docx de Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macintosh. En caso de autoría compartida,
uno de los autores deberá hacerse responsable de toda la correspondencia.
• Junto con el trabajo debe incluirse una lista de al menos 4 posibles revisores del mismo, sin perjuicio de los
que el propio Editor considere oportunos.
• Los manuscritos se presentarán de acuerdo al siguiente esquema:
Primera página. Deberá incluir un título conciso, pero sugerente del contenido del trabajo, así como una traduc-
ción al inglés del mismo (si el artículo no está escrito en inglés). Cuando sea preciso, deberá incluir referencia a
familia o taxones superiores. A continuación figurarán, por este orden, el nombre y apellidos completos del
autor o autores, las direcciones completas de los mismos, y un resumen del trabajo y su traducción al inglés.
Dicho resumen deberá sintetizar, en conjunción con el título, tanto los resultados como las conclusiones del
artículo; se sugiere una extensión de 100 a 200 palabras.
Páginas siguientes. Incluirán el resto del artículo, que debe dividirse en secciones precedidas por breves encabe-
zamientos. Siempre que sea posible, se recomienda seguir el siguiente esquema: Introducción, Material y
métodos. Resultados, Discusión, Conclusiones, Agradecimientos y Bibliografía. Si se emplean abreviaturas no
habituales en el texto, deberán indicarse tras el apartado de Material y Métodos.
• Las notas breves deberán presentarse de la misma forma, pero sin resumen.
• Deberán evitarse notas a pie de página y referencias cruzadas. Deberán respetarse estrictamente los Códigos
Internacionales de Nomenclatura Zoológica y Botánica (últimas ediciones). Cuando un taxón aparezca por
primera vez deberá citarse su autor y fecha de su descripción. En el caso de artículos sistemáticos, cuando se
den las sinonimias de los taxones, éstas deberán citarse COMPLETAS, incluyendo en forma abreviada la
publicación donde fueron descritas, y la localidad tipo si es conocida entre corchetes, según el siguiente
esquema (préstese especial cuidado a la puntuación):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Sinonimias
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Localidad tipo: Marsella].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
Dichas referencias no deberán incluirse en la lista de Bibliografía si es la única vez que se nombran en el texto.
Si se incluyen una lista completa de referencias de un taxón inmediatamente tras éste, deberá seguirse el
mismo esquema (sin incluir en Bibliografía las referencias que no se mencionen en otro lugar del texto).
• Sólo los nombres en latín y los de taxones genéricos y específicos deberán llevar subrayado sencillo o prefe-
rentemente ir en cursiva. En ningún caso deberá escribirse una palabra totalmente en letras mayúsculas, ni
siquiera el Título. Las unidades a utilizar deberán pertenecer al Sistema Métrico Decimal, junto con sus correc-
tas abreviaturas. En artículos escritos en castellano, en los números decimales sepárese la parte entera de la
decimal por una coma inferior (,), NUNCA por un punto (.) o coma superior (')•
• Las referencias bibliográficas irán en el texto con minúsculas o versalitas: Fretter y Graham (1962) o Fretter
y Graham (1962). Si son más de dos autores se deberán citar todos la primera vez que aparecen en el texto
[Smith, Jones y Brown (1970)] empleándose et al. las siguientes veces [Smith et al. (1970)]. Si un autor ha publi-
cado más de un trabajo en un año se citarán con letras: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). No deberá emplearse op.
cit. La lista de referencias deberá incluir todas las citas del texto y sólo éstas, ordenadas alfabéticamente. Se
citarán los nombres de todos los autores de cada referencia, sea cual sea su número. Los nombres de los
autores deberán escribirse, en letras minúsculas o Versalitas. No deberán incluirse referencias a autores
cuando éstos aparezcan en el texto exclusivamente como autoridades de un taxón. Los nombres de las publica-
ciones periódicas deberán aparecer COMPLETOS, no abreviados. Cuando se citen libros, dése el título, editor,
lugar de publicación, n° de edición si no es la primera y número total de páginas. Deberán evitarse referencias
a Tesis Doctorales u otros documentos inéditos de difícil consulta. Síganse los siguientes ejemplos (préstese
atención a la puntuación):
Fretter V. y Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Trunca telloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. En Ponder, W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Las gráficas e ilustraciones deberán ser originales y presentarse preferentemente en formato electrónico al
formato de caja de la revista o proporcional a éste. Este formato es de 57 mm (una columna) o 121 mm (dos) de
anchura y hasta 196 mm de altura, si bien se recomienda utilizar el formato a dos columnas. Es importante que
todas las figuras sean remitidas en su formato original (por ejemplo, las fotografías en .jpg de alta calidad o .tif,
las gráficas en hojas de cálculo Excel o documentos de CorelDraw), puesto que las ilustraciones insertadas en
el manuscrito WORD son inservibles en la fase de imprenta. Las imágenes digitales deben ser formateadas en
su tamaño de impresión con una resolución mínima de 300 ppp para imágenes en color o escala de grises y de
600 ppp para las de blanco y negro. Considérese la reducción que será necesaria a la hora de decidir el tamaño
de las escalas o letras en las figuras, que no deberán bajar de los 2 mm. En figuras compuestas, cada parte
deberá etiquetarse con letras mayúsculas, el resto de las letras deberán ser minúsculas. Las escalas de dibujos y
fotografías deberán ser gráficas, utilizando unidades del sistema métrico decimal; no deberán hacerse referen-
cias a los aumentos de una determinada ilustración, ya que éstos cambian con la reducción. En su caso, se
recomienda la utilización de mapas con proyección UTM. Cada figura, gráfica o ilustración deberá presentarse
en hojas separadas y con numeración arábiga (1, 2, 3,...), sin separar "Figuras" y "Láminas". Los pies de
figura, en una hoja aparte, deberán acompañarse de su traducción al inglés (o español si el inglés es la lengua
del trabajo). Utilícese el esquema siguiente:
Figura 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal desplazándose; B: detalle de un rinóforo; C: branquia.
Las abreviaturas empleadas en las ilustraciones deberán incluirse en los pies de figura.
Los autores interesados en incluir láminas en color deberán consultar con el editor y sufragar el sobrecoste con
una contribución de 50 por página. Por lo demás, deberán ajustarse a los mismos requisitos indicados para las
figuras.
Si se pretende enviar gráficas o ilustraciones en impresión de papel es imprescindible presentar originales de
buena calidad. Las imágenes en semitonos deben estar bien contrastadas y ajustarse al tamaño definitivo de
impresión; al componer fotografías sobre una hoja, procúrese que los espacios entre ellas sean regulares y que
estén debidamente alineadas. Téngase en cuenta que incluir fotografías de distinto contraste en una misma
página conlleva una pobre reproducción final. Las gráficas de ordenador deberán imprimirse con impresora
láser sobre papel de buena calidad.
• Las Tablas se presentarán en hojas separadas, siempre con numeración romana (I, II, III,...). Las leyendas se
incluirán en una hoja aparte acompañándose de una traducción al inglés. Deberán evitarse las tablas particu-
larmente complejas. Se recomienda reducir el número y extensión de ilustraciones, láminas o tablas al mínimo
necesario.
• Los artículos que no se ajusten a las normas de publicación serán devueltos al autor con las indicaciones de
los cambios necesarios.
• El Comité Editorial comunicará al autor responsable del trabajo la fecha de recepción del trabajo y la fecha
de envío a revisión. Cada original recibido será sometido a revisión por al menos dos investigadores. El
Comité Editorial, a la vista de los informes de los revisores decidirá sobre la aceptación o no de cada manus-
crito. El autor recibirá en cada caso copia de los comentarios de los revisores sobre su artículo. En caso de
aceptación, el mismo Comité Editorial, si lo considera conveniente, podrá solicitar a los autores otras modifica-
ciones que considere oportunas. Si el trabajo es aceptado, el autor deberá enviar una copia impresa del mismo
corregida, acompañada por una versión en un CD, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones corrien-
tes de Windows (pero no el formato .docx generado por Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macin-
tosh. La fecha de aceptación figurará en el artículo publicado.
• Las pruebas de imprenta serán enviadas por correo electrónico al autor responsable, exclusivamente para la
corrección de erratas, y deberán ser devueltas en un plazo máximo de una semana. Se recomienda prestar
especial atención en la corrección de las pruebas.
• De cada trabajo se entregarán gratuitamente 50 separatas, además de una versión electrónica en formato
.pdf. Aquellos autores que deseen un número mayor, deberán hacerlo constar al devolver las pruebas de
imprenta, y nunca posteriormente. El coste de las separatas adicionales será cargado al autor.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
• Iberus publishes research papers, notes and monographs devoted to the various aspects of Malacology.
Papers are manuscripts of more than 5 typed pages, including figures and tables. Notes are shorter papers.
Monographs should exceed 50 pages of the final periodical, and may be published as Supplements. Authors
wishing to publish monographs should contact the Editor. Manuscripts are considered on the understanding
that their contents ha ve not been published or simultaneously submitted for publica tion elsewhere.
• Manuscripts and correspondence regarding editorial matters must be sent to: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publica-
ciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga,
Spain and / or to the e-mail <sgofas@uma.es>.
• Manuscripts may be written in Spanish, English, Italian, French or Portuguese.
• Manuscripts must be typed double spaced (including the references, figure captions and tables) on one side
on A-4 (297x210 mm) with margins of at least 3 cm. An original and two copies must be submitted, together
with a CD or e-mail remittance containing the article written with a current Windows (but not .docx format
generated by Word 2007, mainly used with Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. When a paper has
joint authorship, one author must accept responsibility for all correspondence.
• The authors must inelude a list of at least 4 possible referees; the Editor can choose any others if appropriate.
• Papers should conform the following layout:
First page. This must inelude a concise but informative title, with mention of family of higher taxon when
appropriate, and its Spanish translation. It will be followed by all authors' ñames and surnames, their full
address(es), an abstract (and its Spanish translation) not exceeding 200 words which summarizes not only con-
tents but results and conclusions.
Following pages. These should content the rest of the paper, divided into sections under short headings. When-
ever possible the text should be arranged as follows: Introduction, Material and methods, Results, Discussion,
Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Unusual abbreviations used in the text must be grouped in
one alphabetic sequence after the Material and methods section.
• Notes should follow the same layout, without the abstract.
• Footnotes and cross-references must be avoided. The International Codes of Zoological and Botanical
Nomenclature must be strictly followed. The first mention in the text of any taxon must be followed by its
authority including the year. In systematic papers, when synonyms of a taxon are given, they must be cited IN
FULL, including the periodical, in an abbreviate form, where they were described, and the type localities in
square brackets when known. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Synonyms
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, 4 (24): 468-469 [Type locality: Marseille].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
These references must not be included in the Bibliography list, except if referred to elsewhere in the text. If a
full list of references of the taxon is to be given immediately below it, the same layout should be followed (also
excluding from the Bibliography list those which are not cited elsewhere).
Only Latin words and ñames of genera and species should be underlined once or be given in italics. No word
must be written in UPPER CASE LETTERS. SI units are to be used, together with their appropriate symbols. In
Spanish manuscripts, decimal numbers must be separated with a comma (,), NEVER with a point (.) or upper
comma (').
• References in the text should be written in small letters or Small capitals: Fretter and Graham (1962) or
Fretter and Graham (1962). The first mention in the text of a paper with more than two authors must
inelude all of them [Smith, Jones and Brown (1970)], thereafter use et al. [Smith et al. (1970)]. If an author has
published more than one paper per year, refer to them with letters: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). Avoid op. cit.
The references in the reference list should be in alphabetical order and inelude all the publications cited in the
text but only these. ALL the authors of a paper must be included. These should be written in small letters or
Small capitals. The references need not be cited when the author and date are given only as authority for a tax-
onomic ñame. Tifies of periodicals must be given IN FULL, not abbreviated. For books, give the title, ñame of
publisher, place of publication, indication of edition if not the first and total number of pages. Keep references
to doctoral theses or any other unpublished documents to an absolute minimum. See the following examples
(please note the punctuation):
Fretter V. and Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. In Ponder W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Figures must be original and provided preferably in electronic format and adjusted to page format and
column size. These should be one column (57 mm) or two columns (121 mm) wide and up 196 mm high, or be
proportional to these sizes. Two columns format is recommended. It is essential that all figures be supplied in
their original format (e.g. photographs as high-grade .jpg or as .tif files, graphs as Excel spreadsheets or Corel-
Draw files), as the files inserted into WORD documents cannot be used for printing. Digital images must be
given their final printing size with a resolution at least 300 dpi for colour and halftones, and at least 600 dpi for
black/white.
Take into account possible reduction in lettering drawings; final lettering must be at least 2 mm high. In com-
posite drawings, each figure should be given a capital letter; additional lettering should be in lower-case
letters. A scale line, labelled with SI units, must be used to indicate size; magnification ratio must be avoided
as it may be changed during printing. UTM maps are to be used if necessary. Figures must be submitted on
sepárate sheets, and numbered with consecutive Arabic numbers (1, 2, 3,...), without separating 'Plates' and
'Figures'. Legends for Figures must be typed in numerical order on a sepárate sheet, and a Spanish translation
must be included. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Figure 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal crawling; B: rhinophore; C: gills.
If abbreviations are to be used in illustrations, they should be included in the figure captions.
Authors wishing to publish illustrations in colour should consult with the editor and will be charged a contri-
bution of 50 ? per page. They should otherwise follow the same standards as black and white prints.
If the authors want to send Figures in printed format, it is essential to supply good quality origináis. Half-tone
images must be of good contrast, and should be submitted in the final printing size. When mounting pho-
tographs in a block, ensure spacers are of uniform width. Remember that grouping photographs of varied con-
trast results in poor reproduction. Computer graphics must be printed on high quality white paper with a
láser printer.
• Tables must be numbered with Román numbers (I, II, III,...) and each typed on a sepárate sheet. Headings
should be typed on a sepárate sheet, together with their English translation. Complex tables should be
avoided. As a general rule, keep the number and extensión of illustrations and tables as reduced as possible.
• Manuscripts that do not conform to these instructions will be returned for correction before reviewing.
• Authors submitting manuscripts will receive an acknowledgement of receipt, including receipt date, and the
date the manuscript was sent for reviewing. Each manuscript will be critically evaluated by at least two refer-
ees. Based of these evaluations, the Editorial Board will decide on acceptance or rejection. Anyway, authors
will receive a copy of the referees' comments. If a manuscript is accepted, the Editorial Board may indicate
additional changes if desirable. Acceptable manuscripts will be returned to the author for consideration of
comments and criticism; a finalized manuscript must then be returned to the Editor, together with a CD con-
taining the article written with current Windows (but not a .docx format generated by Word 2007, mainly used
under Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. Dates of reception and acceptance of the manuscript will
appear in all published articles.
• Proofs will be e-mailed to the author for correcting errors and must be returned corrected within one week.
At this stage no stylistic changes will be accepted. Pay special attention to references and their dates in the text
and the Bibliography section, and also to numbers of Figures and Tables appearing in the text.
• Fifty reprints per article and a .pdf file will be supplied free of charge. Additional reprints must be ordered
when the page proofs are returned, and will be charged at cost. NO LATER orders will be accepted.
La Sociedad Española de Malacología
Junta Directiva desde el 1 1 de octubre de 2005
Presidente
Vicepresidente
Secretaria
Tesorero
Editor de Publicaciones
Bibliotecario
Vocales
José Templado González
Emilio Rolan Mosquera
María Carmen Salas Casanovas
Luis Murillo Guillen
Serge Gofas
Rafael Araujo Armero
Ramón M. Álvarez Halcón
Benjamín Gómez Moliner
Alberto Martínez Ortí
Diego Moreno Lampreave
José Ramón Arrébola Burgos
La Sociedad Española de Malacología se fundó el 21 de agosto de 1980. La sociedad se registró como una aso-
ciación sin ánimo de lucro en Madrid (Registro N° 4053) con unos estatutos que fueron aprobados el 12 de
diciembre de 1980. Esta sociedad se constituye con el fin de fomentar y difundir los estudios malacológicos
mediante reuniones y publicaciones. A esta sociedad puede pertenecer cualquier persona o institución interesada
en el estudio de los moluscos.
SEDE SOCIAL: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, d José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, España.
Cuotas para 2009:
INSCRIPCIÓN: 6 euros, además de la cuota correspondiente.
A los socios residentes en España se les aconseja domiciliar su cuota. Todos los abonos deberán enviarse al
Tesorero (dirección reseñada anteriormente) el 1 de enero de cada año. Los abonos se harán sin recargos para la
sociedad y en favor de la Sociedad Española de Malacología y no de ninguna persona de la junta directiva. Aque-
llos socios que no abonen su cuota anual dejarán de recibir las publicaciones de la Sociedad. Los bonos de ins-
cripción se enviarán junto con el abono de una cuota anual al Tesorero.
A los residentes en el extranjero se les ruega que abonen su cuota mediante giro postal en euros (internatio-
nal postal money orders in euros sent to the Treasurer). Members living in foreing countries can deduce 6 euros
if paid before 1 5 April.
Cada socio tiene derecho a recibir anualmente los números de Iberas, Reseñas Malacológicas y Noticiarios que
se publiquen.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARIES
Iberus
3 9088 01448 4794
Índice
26 (2) 2008
Benomar, S., Belhsen, O., Goux, D., Mathieu, M. AND Moukrim, A. Ultrastructural studies
on the spermatogenesis of the African mussel Perna perna (Bivalvia: Mytilidae).
Estudio ultraestructural de la espermatogénesis del mejillón africano Perna perna (Bivalvia:
Mytilidae) 1-14
PEÑAS, A., RoláN, E. Y Ballesteros, M. Segunda adición a la fauna malacológica del litoral del
Garraf (NE de la Península Ibérica)
Second addition to the malacological fauna ofthe littoral of Garraf (NE ofthe Iherian Penín-
sula) 15-42
ALDEA, C. AND Troncoso, J. S. Systematics and distribution of shelled molluscs (Gastropoda,
Bivalvia and Scaphopoda) from the South Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea,
West Antárctica
Sistemática y distribución de los moluscos con concha ( Gastropoda , Bivalvia y Scaphopoda)
desde las Islas Shetland del Sur al Mar de Bellingshausen, Antártica Oeste 43-1 17
PuSATERl, E AND GlANNUZZI-SAVELLl, R. A new raphitomine neogastropod from the Mediter-
ranean Sea (Conoidea)
Una nueva especie de Raphitoma ( Conoidea) del mar Mediterráneo 119-126
PÉREZ, M. A., Altonaga, K. AND López, A. New data on the morphology and distribution of
Euglandina obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1 8 44) Gastropoda: Spiraxidae) a Nicaraguan endemism
Nuevos datos sobre la morfología y la distribución de Euglandina obtusa (Pfeiffer, 1844) (Gas-
tropoda: Spiraxidae) un endemismo de Nicaragua 127-131
Oliver, J. D. Y RoláN, E. Las especies del género Chauvetia (Gastropoda, Neogastropoda) del
área de Dakar, Senegal, Africa occidental, con la descripción de diez especies nuevas
The species ofthe genus Chauvetia ( Gastropoda, Neogastropoda) from the Dakar area, Senegal,
West Africa, with the description of ten new species 133-175
Prkic J. AND RUSSO, P. Fusinus buzzurroi (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae), a new species from Croa-
tian coasts
Fusinus buzzurroi (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae), una nueva especie de las costas
croatas 177-183
ISSN 0212-3010
QL-
m
£¿3
mou—
Werus
^ ■■■■ Vol. 27 (1)
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Ib® rus
Revista de ia
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Comité de Redacción (Board of Editors)
Editor de Publicaciones (Editor~in~(hief)
Serge Gofas Universidad de Málaga, España
Director de Redacción (Executive Editor)
Gonzalo Rodríguez Casero Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editora Ejecutiva (Managing Editor )
Eugenia Ma Martínez Cueto-Felgueroso Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editores Adjuntos (Associate editors)
Francisco Javier Conde de Saro Embajada de España, Japón
Benjamín Gómez Moliner Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria, España
Ángel Antonio Luque del Villar Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
Emilio Rolán Mosquera Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, España
José Templado González Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, España
Jesús S. Troncoso Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, España
Comité Editorial (Board of Reviewers)
Kepa Altonaga Sustacha
Eduardo Angulo Pinedo
Rafael Araujo Armero
Thierry Backeljau
Rüdiger Bieler
Sigurd v. Boletzky
José Castillejo Murillo
Karl Edlinger
Antonio M. de Frias Martins
José Carlos García Gómez
Gonzalo Giríbet de Sebastián
Edmund Gittenberger
Ángel Guerra Sierra
Gerhard Haszprunar
Yuri I. Kantor
María Yolanda Manga González
Jordi Martinell Callico
Ron K. O'Dor
Takashi Okutani
Marco Oliverio
Pablo E. Penchaszadeh
Winston F. Ponder
Carlos Enrique Prieto Sierra
Ms de los Ángeles Ramos Sánchez
Francisco Javier Rocha Valdés
Paul G. Rodhouse
Joandoménec Ros i Aragonés
María Carmen Salas Casanovas
Gerhard Steiner
Victoriano Urgorri Carrasco
Anders Warén
Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, España
Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, España
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, España
Instituí Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Bruselas, Bélgica
The Field Museum, Chicago, Estados Unidos
Laboratoire Arago, Banyuls-sur-Mer, Francia
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Viena, Austria
Universidade dos Acores, Acores, Portugal
Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
Harvard University, EE.UU.
National Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden, Holanda
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, CSIC, Vigo, España
Zoologische Staatssammlung München, München, Alemania
A.N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscú, Rusia
Estación Agrícola Experimental, CSIC, León, España
Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Cañada
Nihon University, Fujisawa City, Japón
Universitá di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italia
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia", Buenos Aires, Argentina
Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia
Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, España
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, España
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, CSIC, Vigo, España
British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, Reino Unido
Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España
Instituí für Zoologie der Universitát Wien, Viena, Austria
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Estocolmo, Suecia
Portada de Iberus
Iberus gualtieranus (Linnaeus, 1758), una especie emblemática de la península Ibérica, que da
nombre a la revista. Dibujo realizado por José Luis González Rebollar “Toza”.
Iberus
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Vol. 27 (1)
Oviedo, junio 2009
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus publica trabajos que traten sobre cualquier aspecto relacionado con la Malacología. Se
admiten también notas breves. Iberus edita un volumen anual que se compone de dos o más números.
Instrucciones para los autores
Los manuscritos deben remitirse a: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Bio-
logía Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España.
Los trabajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias). Se recomienda a los autores leer
cuidadosamente las normas de publicación que se incluyen en cada número de la revista.
SUBCRIPCIONES
Iberus puede recibirse siendo socio de la Sociedad Española de Malacología, en cualquiera de sus
formas, o mediante intercambio. Aquellos socios que deseen adquirir números atrasados deberán diri-
girse al bibliotecario.
Los no socios deberán ponerse en contacto con BACKHUYS PUBLISHERS, P.O. Box 321,
2300 AH Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-71-51 70 208, Fax: +31-71-51 71 856, Correo Elec-
trónico: backhuys@euronet.nl
Los resúmenes de los artículos editados en esta revista se publican en Aquatic Science
and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) y en el Zoological Records, BIOSIS.
Contents list published in Aquatic Science and Fisheries Abstracts and Zoological Records,
BIOSIS.
Dep. Leg. B-43072-81
ISSN 0212-3010
Diseño y maquetación: Gonzalo Rodríguez
Impresión: LOREDO, S. L. - Gijón
© Sociedad Española de Malacologia
Iberus, 27 (1): 1-18, 2009
Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva de la Biosfera
“Dehesas de Sierra Morena”, SO de la Península Ibérica
Freshwater molluscs from the Biosphere Reserve “Dehesas de Sierra
Morena”, SW Iberian Península
Juan Carlos PÉREZ-QUINTERO*
Recibido el 16-VI-2008. Aceptado el 16-XII-2008
RESUMEN
Se ha estudiado la fauna de moluscos de agua dulce en 109 cursos de agua de la
Reserva de la Biosfera "Dehesas de Sierra Morena", en el suroeste de la Península Ibé-
rica. Han sido encontradas 19 especies (15 gasterópodos y 4 bivalvos) que se distribu-
yen siguiendo un gradiente de riqueza específica de oeste a este. Tal patrón biogeográ-
fico es debido a variaciones climatológicas y a la distinta disponibilidad de agua a lo
largo del eje mayor de la Reserva, que fluctúa entre las influencias atlánticas de la Sierra
de Aracena y Picos de Aroche y las continentales más estresadas de la Sierra Norte y,
sobre todo, la Sierra de Hornachuelos.
ABSTRACT
Faunistic of freshwater molluscs have been studied in a Mediterranean Biosphere Reserve
"Dehesas de Sierra Morena". In 109 sampling points I have encountered 19 species (15
gastropods and 4 bivalves). Distribution of species richness describes a west-east gradient
along the main Reserve axis. Such biogeographical pattern is related with climatic condi-
tions and water availability of the Reserve, with Atlantic influences in Sierra de Aracena
and Picos de Aroche and Mediterranean-continental in Sierra Norte and Sierra de Hor-
nachuelos.
INTRODUCCIÓN
Los hábitats dulceacuícolas conti-
nentales se encuentran entre los más se-
veramente impactados por la actividad
humana (pérdida o degradación, espe-
cies introducidas, cambio climático),
siendo el declive generalizado de su bio-
diversidad, a nivel global, mucho más
acusado en éstos que en otros ecosiste-
mas continentales o marinos (Ricciardi
y Rasmussen, 1999; Revenga y Kura,
2003; Mouthon y Daufresne, 2006). La
distribución, abundancia y complejidad
de las comunidades de macroinverte-
brados de agua dulce está íntimamente
ligada a factores que determinan la com-
posición de las biocenosis tales como la
estructura del hábitat y las interacciones
bióticas que en él tienen lugar entre los
organismos que componen dichas co-
munidades (Vannote, Minshall, Cum-
mins, Sedell y Cushing, 1980). Como
caso particular, los hábitats dulceacuíco-
las mediterráneos están fuertemente in-
fluenciados por ciclos periódicos de
* Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Campus El
Carmen, Universidad de Huelva. Avenida 3 de Marzo si n, 21071 Huelva. jcperez@uhu.es
1
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
gran variabilidad que fluctúan en torno
a dos episodios que imponen duras pre-
siones evolutivas en la fauna: fuertes
avenidas invernales y extremas sequías
estivales (Pires, Cowx y Coelho, 2000;
Lake, 2003; Bonada, Rieradevall y
Prat, 2006).
Uno de los objetivos de la Directiva
Marco del Agua (DMA) (directiva
2000/ 60 /CE del parlamento europeo y
del consejo, de 23 de octubre de 2000) es
la conservación, protección y mejora de
la calidad ambiental de las aguas en la
Unión Europea, debiendo para ello eva-
luar el estatus ecológico de los ríos euro-
peos utilizando como instrumentos, en-
tre otros, organismos bioindicadores (fi-
toplancton, macrófitas, invertebrados
bentónicos y peces) como garantes de la
calidad o degradación de dichas aguas
(Pollard y Huxhan, 1998; Logan y
Furse, 2002; Irvine, 2004). En ese sen-
tido, y dado el carácter conservacionista
y científico que inspira la creación de
cualquier espacio protegido, es de de-
sear que en ellos se potencie, desde el
punto de vista del análisis biológico de
las aguas continentales europeas, el es-
tudio en profundidad de las comunida-
des de organismos que residen en di-
chos entornos, dotándolos de ese modo
de herramientas adecuadas para abor-
dar el análisis que propone la DMA.
Por otra parte, y desgraciadamente, el
nivel actual de conocimiento acerca de
nuestra fauna acuática dulceacuícola es
claramente asimétrico y refleja el desigual
"peso sistemático" de los distintos grupos
de vertebrados e invertebrados que la
componen. Dentro de estos últimos, la
información que se dispone acerca de la
biodiversidad de los macroinvertebrados
"artrópodos" acuáticos es muy extensa
(ver revisiones en Nieser y Montes, 1984;
Rico, Pérez y Montes, 1990; Sánchez,
Alba y Tierno, 2002, entre otros), mien-
tras que los análisis faunísticos y ecológi-
cos de los "no artrópodos" son, en el mejor
de los casos, escasos (ver revisiones en
Vidal-Abarca y Suárez (1985) y en
Velasco (1990)). La Red Mundial de
Reservas de la Biosfera (programa MaB,
UNESCO; http: / / www.unesco.org.uy/
mab/ marco.html) ha sido diseñada, a
nivel global, primariamente para la pro-
tección y conservación de ecosistemas
terrestres y marinos representativos de los
diferentes hábitats del planeta, siendo
escasas las seleccionadas con el fin exclu-
sivo de conservar hábitats dulceacuícolas
(IUCN, 1994; Ramsar Convention on
Wetlands, 2004). Como elementos dife-
renciales y representativos de entornos
globales, y en aplicación de la DMA, sería
de desear que la información disponible
de la fauna de las Reservas de la Biosfera
ibéricas excediera la tópica y extensa lista
de vertebrados e invertebrados terrestres
y estuviera complementada por listados
de faunística de agua dulce para, de ese
modo, facilitar el estudio y la evaluación
del estatus ecológico de sus ecosistemas
fluviales. Mientras que se dispone de sufi-
ciente información acerca de los verte-
brados dulceacuícolas (Doadrio, 2002;
Pleguezuelos, Márquez y Lizana, 2002),
desgraciadamente no se dispone de listas
actualizadas de invertebrados terrestres,
y prácticamente ninguna de acuáticos, de
la Reserva de la Biosfera "Dehesas de
Sierra Morena" o entorno (Pérez-Quin-
tero, Bech y Huertas, 2004).
Hasta el presente prácticamente no
existen apenas datos acerca de la compo-
sición de la malacofauna dulceacuícola de
esta Reserva de la Biosfera ibérica. Los
únicos disponibles son descripciones muy
parciales (Ortiz de Zárate y Ortiz de
Zárate, 1961; Gasull, 1985), del entorno
de la provincia de Huelva (Pérez-Quin-
tero et al., 2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007),
de provincias limítrofes con la Reserva
(Bech y Altimira, 2003), de ámbito ibérico
(Vidal-Abarca y Suárez, 1985) o de loca-
lidades puntuales donde se han descrito
especies nuevas de Hydrobiidae (Arco-
nada y Ramos, 2006; Arconada y
Ramos, 2007b; Arconada, Delicado y
Ramos, 2007). No existe información
actual sobre la fauna de moluscos dulce-
acuícolas del Parque Natural de Sierra
Norte de Sevilla y del Parque Natural de
la Sierra de Hornachuelos en Córdoba (las
otras dos áreas protegidas que forman,
junto con el Parque Natural Sierra de
Aracena y Picos de Aroche en Huelva, la
Reserva de la Biosfera "Dehesas de Sierra
Morena"). Con este artículo se pretende
2
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena’
Figura 1 . Situación geográfica de la Reserva de la Biosfera “Dehesas de Sierra Morena” en la Penín-
sula Ibérica y localización de los 1 09 puntos muestreados.
Figure 1. Geographic situation of the Biosphere Reserve “ Dehesas de Sierra Morena ” in the Iberian
Península and location of the 109 sampling points.
contribuir al conocimiento de la malaco-
cenosis dulceacuícola de la Reserva, apor-
tando un análisis preliminar de su distri-
bución geográfica en los cursos de agua
muestreados y en sus respectivas cuadrí-
culas UTM.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
Area de estudio
El trabajo de campo se ha realizado
en la Reserva de la Biosfera "Dehesas de
Sierra Morena", localizada en el extremo
suroccidental de la Península Ibérica
(noroeste de Andalucía, España) (Fig. 1).
Esta Reserva está formada por la unión
de tres Parques Naturales: Sierra de
Aracena y Picos de Aroche (SA,
Huelva), Sierra Norte (SN, Sevilla) y
Sierra de Hornachuelos (SH, Córdoba).
El clima de la zona es mediterráneo plu-
viestacional oceánico (Worldwide Bio-
CLIMATIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM),
caracterizado por severas sequías estiva-
les (junio-septiembre) y moderadas pre-
cipitaciones durante el invierno. La tem-
peratura ambiente media oscila entre
15.0 y 18.9 ° C y la pluviosidad entre 232
y 1644 mm (Villa y Hernández, 2003).
Esta estacionalidad se refleja en la red
hidrológica de la Reserva, en la que la
3
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
(Página derecha) Tabla I. Variables ambientales utilizadas para caracterizar los puntos de muestreo.
Izquierda: media ± Desviación Standard y rangos (entre paréntesis) de los parámetros medidos en
el total de la Reserva de la Biosfera (B) y en los tres Parques naturales (SA, SN y SH). Derecha:
ANOVA entre zonas. Para las variables del hábitat: (*) GIS, (**): in situ , (***): Worldwide Biocli-
matic Classification System. Para intervalos de hábitat: Pd= 1: <7%, 2: 7-15%, 3:> 15%; Vc= 1:
lenta, 2: moderada, 3: moderada-rápida, 4: rápida; Pm= 1: riveras siempre secas durante el verano,
2: riveras siempre secas durante el verano pero con pozas aisladas, 3: riveras secas sólo durante
sequías extremas, 4: riveras con flujo permanente. Para ANOVA, n.s.= no significativo; entre
paréntesis diferencias no significativas entre zonas según el test HSD de Tukey.
(Right page) Tahle I. Environmental variables used to characterize the sampled sites. Lefi: mean ± Stan-
dard deviation and ranges {in parentheses) ofthe measured habitat parameters in the Biosphere Reserve
as a whole (B) and in the three Natural Parks {SA, SN and SH). Right: ANOVA between zones. For
habitat variables: {*): GIS, {**): in situ, {***): Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System. For
habitat intervals: Pd= 1: <7%, 2: 7-15%, 3: >15%; Vc= 1: slow, 2: modérate, 3: moderate-fast, 4:
fast; Pm= 1: streams always dried during the drought period, 2: streams always dried during the
drought period but with isolated pools, 3: streams dried only during severe droughts, 4: streams always
with permanent flow. For ANOVA, n.s. = not significant; in parentheses non-significant differences
between zones according to Tukey HSD test.
mayoría de los cursos de agua soporta
acusados estiajes que implican disminu-
ción de caudal o desaparición de los mis-
mos durante el verano (básicamente en la
zona oriental de la Reserva). Las princi-
pales cuencas y subcuencas existentes
son las de los ríos y riveras (de oeste a
este): Chanza, Múrtigas, Huelva, Viar,
Huéznar, Retortillo, Bembézar y Gua-
diato (López, 1998; Pozuelo, Gañán y
Martín, 2005). El flujo natural de los cur-
sos de agua de la Reserva está alterado
por la presencia de siete embalses (de
oeste a este): Aracena, Zufre, El Pintado,
Huéznar, José Torán, Retortillo, Bembé-
zar y Breña, con una capacidad total de
envasado de 1273 hm3 y un rango que
oscila entre 61 (Retortillo) y 342 (Bembé-
zar) hm3 (http: / / www.embalses.net)
Trabajo de campo
Ciento nueve cursos de agua han
sido muestreados durante Marzo-Junio
de 2004 y Marzo-Junio de 2005 (Fig. 1),
la mayoría (47.7%) de primer orden,
33,0% de segundo, 11,0% de tercero,
7.3% de cuarto y 0,9% de quinto orden
(Gordon, McMahon, Finlayson,
Gippel y Nathan, 2004). Los puntos de
muestreo han sido seleccionados por su
accesibilidad, analizando en cada uno
de ellos dos parcelas de aproximada-
mente 30 m2 (dependiendo de la
anchura del curso de agua). Previa-
mente al muestreo fueron medidos o
estimados distintas características del
hábitat, incluyendo parámetros climáti-
cos, de heterogeneidad, geográficos, fisi-
coquímicos y estructurales de los cursos
de agua (Tabla I). El muestreo de las
malacocenosis se realizó en aguas de
menos de 150 cm de profundidad, utili-
zando redes de 0,3 mm de luz de malla
en todos los posibles microhábitats del
cauce. Tras su captura, los individuos
fueron lavados y conservados en etanol
al 70%, excepto las náyades que eran
identificadas y vueltas al curso de agua.
Las especies fueron identificadas en el
laboratorio tomando como referencia las
siguientes publicaciones: Glóer (2002),
Glóer y Meier-brook (2003), Killeen,
Alridge y Oliver (2004) y Arconada y
Ramos (2007b).
Análisis de los datos
Se han seguido tres aproximaciones
para comparar la biodiversidad de la
malacocenosis de los tres entornos pro-
tegidos: riqueza (de especies. Re, de gas-
terópodos, Rg, de bivalvos, Rb, y de fa-
milias, Rf), abundancia de especies (Ae)
y diversidad de Shannon-Wiener (H'e).
La distribución de las especies ha
sido analizada mediante dos tipos de re-
presentaciones: distribución en los pun-
4
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
5
Iberus , 27 (1), 2009
tos muestreados (mapa hidrográfico de
la Reserva) y en cuadrículas UTM 10 x
10 km (mapa UTM de la Reserva). Dos
índices biogeográficos fueron calculados
para cada especie: área de ocupación
(AO), definida como el tanto por ciento
de cursos de agua (AOa) o de cuadrícu-
las de 100 km2 (AOc) donde aparece la
especie, y distancia lineal (DL), definida
como la mayor distancia entre cursos de
agua (DLa) o cuadrículas de 100 km2
(DLc) donde aparece la especie (Gas-
tón, 1996; Segurado y Araujo, 2004).
Para todas las especies se considera-
rán los siguientes criterios: especie de
distribución puntual (AOa < 10%, AOc <
12%), especie de distribución restringida
(AOa entre 11-50%, AOc entre 12,1-
35%), especie de distribución amplia
(AOa entre 51-99%, AOc entre 36-99%) y
especie de distribución ubicua (AOa=
100% y AOc= 100%). Las poblaciones de
especies de distribución puntual estarán
cercanas cuando DLa < 35 km, distantes
cuando 36 < DLa < 90 km y muy distan-
tes cuando DLa > 91 km.
Sólo se tuvieron en cuenta los indivi-
duos vivos. Las localidades donde sólo
se encontraron conchas vacías de gaste-
rópodos o bivalvos fueron excluidas del
análisis.
RESULTADOS
Hábitat
En la Tabla I se consignan los valores
del hábitat del entorno de los cursos de
agua analizados. Las características
estructurales del medio marcan un gra-
diente muy definido de oeste a este,
correspondiendo en todos los casos los
valores máximos al entorno de la Sierra
de Aracena y Picos de Aroche. El
balance hídrico es, igualmente, diferente
a lo largo del eje principal de la Reserva
(test de Wilks, F (s,206)= 0,45, p<0,001),
diferenciándose significativamente los
parámetros climáticos de moderada
influencia atlántica de la Sierra de
Aracena y Picos de Aroche de los conti-
nentales y más estresados hídricamente
de Sierra Norte y Sierra de Hornachue-
los (test de Tukey, p<0,001 entre aquel y
estos), no siendo significativas las dife-
rencias entre estas dos últimas zonas.
Especies
La malacofauna de "Dehesas de
Sierra Morena" está formada principal-
mente por especies paleárticas. Se han
encontrado 18 especies vivas (14 gaste-
rópodos y 4 bivalvos) en dicha zona, de
las cuales 17 son autóctonas y 1 introdu-
cida ( Potamopyrgus antipodarum) (Tabla
II). Aunque se ha constatado la presen-
cia de valvas vacías de Anodonta anatina,
no se ha podido comprobar la presencia
de individuos vivos en los cursos de
agua de la Reserva.
Las correlaciones entre los valores de
Re, Rg, Rb, Rf y H'e y los del medio son
ampliamente significativas (p entre 0,01
y 0,001 en todos los casos). El grado de
significación de Ae es, igualmente,
variable aunque las correlaciones con
QBR, Cm, H's, Pd, Or, Ac, Pf y Ve no
son estadísticamente significativas.
La riqueza específica oscila entre 2-9
(media 4,3±2,0 SD) y está íntimamente
relacionada con la riqueza de gasterópo-
dos (2-8, media 4,0+1, 5 SD): r= 0,96,
p<0,001. Las diferencias de riqueza espe-
cífica entre los tres espacios protegidos del
área de estudio son significativas, depen-
diendo, no obstante, dichas divergencias
de las relaciones entre SA con SN y SH
(test HSD de Tukey, p>0,05). Igualmente,
los valores de riqueza de familias, abun-
dancia y diversidad de Shannon-Wiener
son significativamente mayores en el
entorno de SA, no siendo significativas las
diferencias entre los valores de SN y SH
(test HSD de Tukey, p>0,05) (ver Tabla III).
Las especies de gasterópodos autóc-
tonos se han encontrado en el 100% de
los puntos muestreados, estando el orden
Pulmonata representado en todos ellos y
el Neotaenioglossa en el 29.3%. Los bival-
vos se encuentran en el 28.4% de las loca-
lidades (la náyade Unió cf. pictorum sólo
reside en el 3,7% del territorio). Physella
acuta, Ancylus fluviatilis y Planorbarius me-
tidjensis son simpátricas en toda la Re-
serva, Pisidium casertanum y Arganiella
wolfi sólo lo son en su área de distribu-
ción (Parque Natural Sierra de Aracena y
Picos de Aroche) (ver Figuras 2-20).
6
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO : Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
Tabla II. Especies de moluscos de agua dulce encontradas en “Dehesas de Sierra Morena”. (*): sólo
se encontraron valvas.
Table II. Freshwater mollusc species found in “Dehesas de Sierra Morena”. (*): only valves were founded.
CLASE GASTROPODA
Orden Neotaenioglossa
Familia Thiaridae
Melanopsis praemorsa (Linnaeus, 1758) (Mp)
Familia Hydrobiidae
Arganiella wolfi (Boeters & Glóer, 2007) (Aw)
Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J.E. Gray, 1843) (Pa)
Orden Pulmonata
Familia Lymnaeidae
Stagnicola palustris (O.F. Müller, 1774) (Sp)
Galbo truncatula (O.F. Müller, 1774) (Gt)
Radix auricularía (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ra)
Radix baltbica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Rb)
Familia Physidae
Physella ( Costatella ) acuta (Draparnaud, 1805) (Pt)
Familia Planorbidae
Planorbarius metidjensis (Forbes, 1 838) (Pm)
Eerrissia ( Pettancylus ) clessiniana (Jickeli, 1 882) (Fe)
Gyraulus ( Gyraulus ) albus (O.F. Müller, 1 774) (Ga)
Gyraulus ( Torquis ) laevis (Alder, 1838) (Gl)
Hippeutis complanatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (He)
Ancylus fluviatilis (O.F. Müller, 1 774) (Af)
CLASE BIVALVIA
Orden Unionida
Familia Unionidae
Anodonta anatina* (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aa)
Unió cf. pictorum (Linnaeus, 1758) (Up)
Familia Sphaeriidae
Musculium ( Musculium ) lacustre (O.F. Müller, 1774) (MI)
Pisidium ( Euglessa ) casertanum (Poli, 1791) (Pe)
Pisidium ( Euglessa ) personatum (Malm, 1855) (Pp)
Distribución y preferencia de hábitat
Melanopsis praemorsa (Linnaeus, 1758)
Esta especie, aunque no incluida en
el Libro Rojo de Invertebrados de Es-
paña (Verdú y Galante, 2006), ha sido
propuesta para ser catalogada a nivel
nacional como especie “sensible a la al-
teración de su hábitat" (Gómez, Mo-
reno, Rolán, Araujo y Álvarez, 2001).
En Andalucía está considerada como es-
pecie vulnerable (Barea-Azcón, Ba-
llesteros-Duperón y Moreno, 2008).
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Alonso (1975a); Vidal-
Abarca y Suárez (1985); Jiménez y
Martínez (1988); Pujante, Tapia y
Martínez (1998); Hinz et al. (1994);
Gómez et al. (2001).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 2): especie de distribución puntual
en SA y SN (Gasull, 1985; Pérez-Quin-
tero et al., 2004), con poblaciones dis-
7
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figuras 2-1 . Distribución de las especies en los mapas geográficos y UTM de la Reserva.
Figures 2-7. Distribution ofthe species in the geographic and UTM Reserve maps.
tantes entre si. AOa= 4,6, AOc= 8.0,
DLa= 58.7, DLc= 58.4.
Preferencia de hábitat (valores
medios): la (0,9), Pr (880,0), Sh (418.6),
Dh (352,8), Cm (36.0), Pm (3,4), H's
(1,5), Al (457.0), Pd (2,2), Or (2,0), Co
(317.6), Tu (211,0), pH (8.3), Ac (203,0),
Pf (49.0).
Arganiella wolfi (Boeters y Gloer, 2007)
En Andalucía esta especie está consi-
derada como especie vulnerable
(Barea-Azcón et al., 2008).
Distribución en la Península Ibérica :
Bech y Altimira (2003); Pérez-Quin-
tero et al. (2004); Arconada y Ramos
(2007a,b); Boeters y Gloer (2007);
Pérez-Quintero (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 3): SA (Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004; Arconada y Ramos, 2007a,b;
Pérez-Quintero, 2007). Especie de dis-
8
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
Figuras 8-13. Distribución de las especies en los mapas geográficos y UTM de la Reserva.
Figures 8-13. Distribution ofthe species in the geographic and UTM Reserve maps.
tribución restringida a la zona central de
la SA, con poblaciones cercanas. AOa=
22,0, AOc= 14,0, DLa= 47.6, DLc= 50,6.
Preferencia de hábitat : la (0,7), Pr
(1079.1), Sh (599.5), Dh (325.5), Cm
(36.9) , Pm (3,6), H's (1,5), Al (522,3), Pd
(1.9) , Or (1,2), Co (284,1), Tu (214,7), pH
(7.9) , Ac (218.3), Pf (50,6).
Nota : Bech y Altimira (2003) descri-
ben la presencia de esta especie en
Badajoz, nombrándola como Valvata glo-
bulina, mientras que Pérez-Quintero et
al. (2004) y Arconada y Ramos (2007a)
describen su presencia en la SA adscri-
biéndola a Islamia minuta y Arganiella
tartessica, respectivamente.
Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J. E. Gray, 1853)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Alonso (1975a); Ibáñez y Alonso
(1977); González, Puig, Tort y Prat
(1981); Vid al- Abarca y Suárez (1985);
9
Iberusy 27 (1), 2009
Boeters (1987); Simóes (1988); Gracia,
Fonseca y Castro (1989); Bech (1990);
Pujante et al. (1998); Hinz et al. (1994);
Hermida y Rodríguez (1996); Martí-
nez-Ortí, Aparicio y Robles (2004); So-
ler, Moreno, Araujo y Ramos (2006);
Sousa, Antunes y Guilhermino (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 4): especie de distribución puntual
en SA y SN (Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007), con pobla-
ciones muy distantes entre si. AOa= 5.5,
AOc= 12,0, DLa= 128.7, DLc= 129.5.
Preferencia de hábitat : la (1,0), Pr
(852,5), Sh (394,5), Dh (366.7), Cm (26.7),
Pm (3,3), H's (1,5), Al (373,0), Pd (1,7),
Or (2,5), Co (444,0), Tu (294,3), pH (7.9),
Ac (283,3), Pf (60,0).
Stagnicola palustris (O. F. Müller, 1774)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica :
Ramos y Aparicio (1985); Hinz et al.
(1994); Soler et al. (2006); Oliveira y
Martínez-Ortí (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 5): especie de distribución puntual
en SA (Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004)
con poblaciones cercanas entre sí. AOa=
2,7, AOc= 2,0, DLa= 6.3, DLc= 0.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,7), Pr
(1104,0), Sh (624,0), Dh (312,0), Cm
(38.3), Pm (3,3), H's (1,6), Al (560,0), Pd
(1,7), Or (1,3), Co (264,7), Tu (211,7), pH
(8.1), Ac (240,0), Pf (58.3).
Galba truncatula (O. F. Müller, 1774)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
nobre (1941); Sampaio, Fraga y
Mattos (1973); Alonso (1975a); Vidal-
Abarca y Suárez (1985); Bech (1990);
Pujante et al. (1998); Hinz et al.
(1994); Hermida y Rodríguez (1996);
Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 6): especie localizada en la SA, SN
y SH, con distribución restringida y
poblaciones muy distantes (Pérez-
Quintero et al., 2004). AOa= 19.3,
AOc= 18.0, DLa= 187.4, DLc= 158.0.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,8), Pr
(998.3), Sh (523,0), Dh (359.4), Cm (31,9),
Pm (3,1), H's (1,5), Al (468.9), Pd (1,9),
Or (1,5), Co (298.4), Tu (245.4), pH (7.9),
Ac (256.9), Pf (54,0).
Radix auricularia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Valente y Vicente (1979);
Grácio (1983); Gasull (1985); Ramos y
Aparicio (1985); Vidal-Abarca y
Suárez (1985); Jiménez y Martínez
(1988); Bech (1990); Pujante et al.
(1998); Hinz et al. (1994); Hermida y
Rodríguez (1996); Soler et al. (2006);
Sousa et al. (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 7): especie de distribución puntual
con poblaciones cercanas localizadas en
SA (Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004). AOa=
1,8, AOc= 4,0, DLa= 11,9, DLc= 11,8.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,8), Pr (993,5), Sh
(523,0), Dh (331,5), Cm (40,0), Pm (4,0), H's
(1,5), Al (432,5), Pd (2,5), Or (1,5), Co (304,5),
Tu (209.2), pH (8.1), Ac (245.0), Pf (47.5).
Radix balthica (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica: Vidal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Jiménez
nobre (1941); Valente y Vicente (1979); y Martínez (1988); Bech (1990); Pujante
Grácio (1983); Ramos y Aparicio (1985); et al. (1998); Hinz et al. (1994);
10
PÉREZ- QUINTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena’
Tabla III. Izquierda: Media ± Desviación Standard y rangos (entre paréntesis) de las medidas de
biodiversidad en los tres espacios protegidos y en el conjunto de la Reserva de la Biosfera (B).
Derecha: ANOVA entre zonas.
Table III. Mean ± Standard deviation and intervals ( between parentheses) ofthe biodiversity measures
in the three protected spaces and in the Biosphere Reserve as a whole {B). Right: ANOVA between zones.
Hermida y Rodríguez (1996); Soler et
al. (2006); Sousa et al. (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 8): especie de distribución restrin-
gida, con poblaciones localizadas princi-
palmente en SA y escasas en SN
(Gasull, 1985; Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007). AOa=
35.8, AOc= 32,0, DLa= 119.0, DLc= 120,1.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,8), Pr (990,7),
Sh (518.8), Dh (337.6), Cm (33,2), Pm (3,3),
H's (1,5), Al (505.4), Pd (1,9), Or (1,5), Co
(324,4), Tu (233,5), pH (7.9), Ac (226.9), Pf
(2,6).
Physella ( Costatella ) acuta (Draparnaud, 1805)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Marazanof (1966); Grá-
cio (1983); Ramos y Aparicio (1985); Vi-
dal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Jiménez y
Martínez (1988); Gra^a et al. (1989);
Bech (1990); Pujante et al. (1998);
Hinz et al. (1994); Hermida y Rodrí-
guez (1996); Soler et al. (2006); Sousa
ET AL. (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 9): especie ubicua sintópica con Ancy-
lus fluviatilis (Gasull, 1985; Pérez-Quin-
tero et al., 2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007).
AOa= 100, AOc= 100, DLa= 187.8, DLc= 188.3.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (1,0), Pr (864,5), Sh
(404,5), Dh (386.7), Cm (25.4), Pm (2,7), H's
(1,4), Al (429.9), Pd (1,7), Or (1,8), Co (394,6),
Tu (291,7), pH (7.7), Ac (257.0), Pf (58.1).
Planorbarius metidjensis (Forbes, 1838)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Fraga y do Carmo
(1954); Grácio (1983); Vidal-Abarca y
Suárez (1985); Vidal-Abarca, Gómez y
Suárez (1991); Hinz et al. (1994);
Hermida y Rodríguez (1996); Soler et
al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 10): especie de distribución amplia
con poblaciones en todos los entornos
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
protegidos de la Reserva (Ortiz de
Zárate y Ortiz de Zárate, 1961;
Gasull, 1985; Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007). AOa= 81,6,
AOc= 62,0, DLa= 178.4, DLc= 176.9.
Preferencia de hábitat : la (0,9), Pr
(901,6), Sh (438.9), Dh (369.1), Cm (27.7),
Pm (2,8), H's (1,5), Al (443,5), Pd (1,8),
Or (1,7), Co (386.3), Tu (279.4), pH (7.8),
Ac (252,3), Pf (55.8).
Ferrissia (Pettancylus) clessiniana (Jickeli, 1882)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Vidal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Bech
(1990); álvarez. Rico, Guerrero y
Montes (2001); Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Bios-
fera (Fig. 11): especie de distribución
puntual con poblaciones muy distantes
localizadas en SA y SN (Pérez-Quin-
tero et al., 2004; Pérez-Quintero,
2007). AOa= 4,6, AOc= 8.0, DLa= 99.6,
DLc= 100,2.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (1,0), Pr
(838.6), Sh (373,6), Dh (362,6), Cm (22,0),
Pm (3,0), H's (1,4), Al (349.0), Pd (1,4),
Or (2,6), Co (465.8), Tu (346.6), pH (7.7),
Ac (338.0), Pf (67.0).
Gyraulus ( Gyraulus ) albus (O.F. Müller, 1774)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Marazanof (1966);
Vidal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Jiménez
y Martínez (1988); Bech (1990);
Pujante et a, (1998); Vidal-Abarca et
al. (1991); Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 12): especie de distribución pun-
tual con poblaciones cercanas en SA
(Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004; Pérez-
Quintero, 2007). AOa= 6.4, AOc= 10,0,
DLa= 33,0, DLc= 37.6.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,9), Pr (922,0), Sh
(459.1), Dh (360,3), Cm (31,4), Pm (3,6), FTs
(1,5), Al (412,8), Pd (2,4), Or (1,6), Co (349.1),
Tu (236.3), pH (7.9), Ac (268.6), Pf (57.1).
Gyraulus ( Torquis ) laevis (Alder, 1838)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Marazanof (1966); Vidal-Abarca y
Suárez (1985); Jiménez y Martínez
(1988); Bech (1990); Pujante et al.
(1998); Vidal-Abarca et al. (1991);
Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 13): especie de distribución puntual con
poblaciones cercanas en SA (Pérez-Quin-
tero et al., 2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007).
AOa= 9.2, AOc= 12,0, DLa= 42,8, DLc= 41,3.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,7), Pr
(1068.9), Sh (590,4), Dh (329.7), Cm (38.9),
Pm (3,8), H's (1,6), Al (547.2), Pd (1,9), Or
(1,2), Co (273,5), Tu (233,0), pH (7.9), Ac
(227.8), Pf (47.8).
Hippeutis complanatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Marazanof (1966);
Vidal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Bech
(1990); Pujante et al. (1998); Soler et
al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 14): especie de distribución
puntual con poblaciones muy distantes
en SA y SH (Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004; Pérez-Quintero, 2007). AOa= 1,8,
AOc= 4,0, DLa= 164,8, DLc= 167.5.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (1,2), Pr
(791,5), Sh (321,0), Dh (448.5), Cm (20,0),
Pm (3,0), H's (1,4), Al (231,5), Pd (1,0),
Or (4,0), Co (451,0), Tu (41357), pH (7.6),
Ac (350,0), Pf (65.0).
12
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
Figuras 14-20. Distribución de las especies en los mapas geográficos y UTM de la Reserva.
Figures 14-20. Distribution ofthe species in the geographic and UTM Reserve maps.
Ancylus fluviatilis (O. F. Muller, 1774)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Marazanof (1966);
Alonso (1975a); Grácio (1983); Vi-
dal-Abarca y Suárez (1985); Rolán,
Vilas y Nombela (1987); Jiménez y
Martínez (1988); Bech (1990); Pujan-
te et al. (1998); Rallo y Rico (1993);
Hinz et al. (1994); Martínez-Ortí et
al. (2004); Soler et al. (2006); Sousa
et al. (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 15): especie ubicua sintópica con
13
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Phy sella acuta (Ortiz de Zárate y Ortiz
de Zárate, 1961; Gasull, 1985; Pérez-
Quintero et al., 2004; Pérez-Quintero,
2007). AOa= 100, AOc= 100, DLa= 187.8,
DLc= 188.3.
Preferencia de hábitat : la (1,0), Pr
(864,5), Sh (404,5), Dh (386.7), Cm (25.4),
Pm (2,7), H's (1,4), Al (429.9), Pd (1,7),
Or (1,8), Co (394,6), Tu (291,7), pH (7.7),
Ac (257.0), Pf (58.1).
Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Esta especie, aunque no incluida en
el Libro Rojo de Invertebrados de
España (Verdú y Galante, 2006), ha
sido propuesta para ser catalogada a
nivel nacional como especie "de interés
especial" (Gómez et al, 2001). En Anda-
lucía está considerada como especie casi
amenazada (Barea-Azcón et al., 2008).
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Altaba (1980); Altimira (1968);
Araujo, Bragado y Ramos (2000);
Araujo (2004); Bech y Altimira (2003);
Galhano y Ferreira (1983); Gasull
(1981); Gasull (1985); Moura, Vila-
rinho, Guedes y Machado (2000);
Pérez-Quintero, 2007; Sousa et al.,
2007.
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 16): no se han encontrado indivi-
duos vivos, sólo valvas en cursos de
agua de SA: Arroyo Borbolluela, Arroyo
Sillo, Rivera de Cala, Rivera de Huelva
y Rivera del Chanza (ver Figura 16).
Preferencia de hábitat: los cursos de agua
donde se han encontrado los restos de esta
especie tienen las siguientes característi-
cas: la (0,9), Pr (904,7), Sh (436.8), Dh
(358.2) , Cm (20,8), Pm (3,7), H's (1,4), Al
(370,0), Pd (1,3), Or (3,0), Co (407.7), Tu
(277.2) , pH (7.9), Ac (336.7), Pf (64,2).
Unió cf. pictorum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Esta especie, aunque no incluida en
el Libro Rojo de Invertebrados de
España (Verdú y Galante, 2006), ha
sido propuesta para ser catalogada a
nivel nacional como especie "en peligro
de extinción" (Gómez, et al., 2001). En
Andalucía está considerada como
especie "vulnerable" (Barea-azcón et
al., 2008).
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Alonso (1975a); Vidal-
Abarca y Suárez (1985); Gómez et al.
(2001); Araujo (2004); Soler et al.
(2006); Sousa et al. (2007).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 17): especie de distribución puntual
con poblaciones muy distantes en SA y
SN (Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004). AOa=
3,7, AOc= 8.0, DLa= 99.5, DLc= 98.6.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (1,0), Pr
(868.0), Sh (402,5), Dh (347.7), Cm (32,5),
Pm (3,7), H's (1,6), Al (355.2), Pd (1,7),
Or (3,2), Co (401,0), Tu (263,6), pH (8.1),
Ac (327.5), Pf (53,7).
Musculium (Musculium) lacustre (O. F. Müller, 1774)
Esta especie, aunque no incluida en
el Libro Rojo de Invertebrados de
España (Verdú y Galante, 2006), ha
sido propuesta para ser catalogada a
nivel nacional como especie "de interés
especial" (Gómez et al., 2001).
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Vid al- Abarca y Suárez (1985); Gómez et
al. (2001); Martínez-Ortí y Robles (2003);
Araujo (2004); Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 18): especie de distribución
puntual con una única población en SA
(Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004). AOa=
0,9, AOc= 2,0, DLa= 0, DLc= 0.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,9), Pr
(883,0), Sh (422,0), Dh (351,0), Cm (40,0),
Pm (4,0), H's (1,6), Al (405.0), Pd (3,0),
Or (2,0), Co (300,0), Tu (220,0), pH (8.2),
Ac (290,0), Pf (45.0).
14
PÉREZ- QUINTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
Pisidium ( Euglessa ) casertanum (Poli, 1791)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Nobre (1941); Kuiper (1961); Alonso
(1975b); Vidal- Abarca y Suárez (1985);
Bech (1990); Hinz et al. (1994); Araujo
(1998); Araujo (2004); Soler et al.
(2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 19): especie de distribución restrin-
gida en la SA (Pérez-Quintero et al.,
2004). AOa= 22,0, AOc= 18.0, DLa= 59.6,
DLc= 51,2.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,7), Pr
(1070,3), Sh (589.9), Dh (330,1), Cm
(36.7), Pm (3,7), H's (1,5), Al (530,6), Pd
(2.0) , Or (1,3), Co (319.3), Tu (231,6), pH
(8.0) , Ac (225.0), Pf (49.6).
Pisidium ( Euglessa ) personatum (Malm, 1855)
Distribución en la Península Ibérica:
Kuiper (1961); Alonso (1975b); Vidal-
Abarca y Suárez (1985); Bech (1990);
Hinz et al. (1994); Araujo (1998);
Araujo (2004); Soler et al. (2006).
Distribución en la Reserva de la Biosfera
(Fig. 20): especie de distribución restringida
CONCLUSIONES
En relación a las características del
hábitat de la Reserva de la Biosfera sólo
se conocen datos puntuales y muy gene-
rales del entorno (Franco, 1994; Prenda,
1997; Villa y Hernández, 2003). En este
estudio se analiza el gradiente que se esta-
blece entre los extremos occidental y orien-
tal de la Reserva en función de cinco
grupos de variables ambientales relacio-
nadas con el entorno general y los cursos
de agua en particular, estudiando cómo
condicionan dichas variables la distribu-
ción de los moluscos dulceacuícolas.
Se examina por vez primera la biodi-
versidad malacológica dulceacuícola y su
distribución en un entorno mediterráneo
protegido del sur de la Península Ibérica
(Dehesas de Sierra Morena, comunidad
autónoma andaluza). Los datos previos
son escasos y puntuales en el entorno de
la Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche
(Ortiz de Zárate y Ortiz de Zárate,
1961; Gasull, 1985; Arconada y Ramos,
2007b; Arconada, Delicado y Ramos,
2007) y en el de la Sierra de Hornachue-
los (Arconada y Ramos, 2006). pérez-
Quintero et al. (2004) describen la com-
posición faunística del Parque Natural
Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche en un
en la SA (Pérez-Quintero et al., 2004).
AOa= 11,9, AOc= 14,0, DLa= 40,3, DLc= 44,0.
Preferencia de hábitat: la (0,7), Pr
(1077.1), Sh (595.8), Dh (323,3), Cm
(40.0) , Pm (3,8), H's (1,5), Al (525.0), Pd
(1,9), Or (1,2), Co (287.9), Tu (213,1), pH
(8.0) , Ac (201,1), Pf (45.0).
análisis provincial de las malacocenosis
dulceacuícolas. A nivel regional pérez-
Quintero (2007) detalla la distribución y
conservación de los moluscos dulceacuí-
colas de las subcuencas ibéricas del bajo
Guadiana, incluyendo parte del entorno
de la Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche.
En relación a la biodiversidad una de
las conclusiones más relevantes de este
estudio es la descripción del gradiente en
riqueza específica, abundancia y diversi-
dad de Shannon- Wiener que se establece
a lo largo del eje mayor de este entorno
protegido. Este gradiente se organiza en
función, fundamentalmente, de la dispo-
nibilidad hídrica y de los cambios en la
heterogeneidad del medio a lo largo del
eje oeste-este de la Reserva. En este
estudio se amplía el área de distribución
de las especies con carácter más eurícoro,
fundamentalmente los gasterópodos
Radix balthica, Phy sella acuta, Planorbarius
metidjensis y Ancylus fluviatilis y el
bivalvo Unió cf. pictorum. Por otro lado se
han encontrado nuevas localidades colo-
nizadas por la especie invasora Pota-
mopyrgus antipodarum y se presentan
datos que confirman el carácter estenó-
coro de especies como Melanopsis prae-
15
Iberusy 27 (1), 2009
morsa, Ar gamella wolfi, Stagnicola palustris,
Radix auricularia y ambas especies de Pisi-
dium, todas ellas confinadas en entornos
húmedos con cursos de agua estables a lo
largo del ciclo anual.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Alonso M.R. 1975a. Moluscos terrestres y dul-
ceacuícolas de la depresión de Granada y
sus alrededores. Cuadernos de Ciencias Bioló-
gicas, 4: 125-157.
Alonso M.R. 1975b. El género Pisidium en la de-
presión de Granada (España). Cuadernos de
Ciencias Biológicas, 4: 97-104.
Altaba C.R. 1980. Introducció a Testudi deis
mol.luscs deis Aiguamolls de Talt Empordá.
Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d 'Historia Na-
tural, 45 (Zool., 3): 31-36.
Altimira C. 1968. Contribución al conocimiento
de la fauna malacológica terrestre y de agua
dulce de Gerona. Miscelánea Zoológica, 2: 17-
28.
Alvarez S., Rico E., Guerrero M.C. y Mon-
tes C. 2001. Decomposition of Juncus mariti-
mus in two shallow lakes of Doñana Natio-
nal Park. International Review ofHydrobiology,
86:541-554.
Araujo R. 1998. The Pisidium fauna of Portu-
gal, with particular reference to shell mi-
crosculpture. Bivalvia, 1: 39-51.
Araujo R. 2004. Los bivalvos dulceacuícolas de
la Rioja. Zubia, 22: 29-39.
Araujo R, Bragado D. y Ramos M.A. 2000.
Occurrence of glochidia of the endangered
Margaritifera auricularia and other mussels'
species (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in drift and on
fishes in an ancient channel of the Ebro River,
Spain. Archivfür Hydrobiologie, 148: 147-160.
Arconada B. y Ramos M.A. 2006. Revisión of
the genus Islamia Radoman, 1973 (Gastro-
poda, Caenogastropoda, Hydrobiidae) on
the Iberian Península and description of two
new genera and three new species. Malaco-
logia, 48: 77-132.
Arconada B., Delicado D. y Ramos M.A.
2007. A new genus and two new species of
Hydrobiidae (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda)
from the Iberian Península. Journal of Natu-
ral History, 41: 29-32.
Arconada B. y Ramos M.A. 2007a. Description
of a new species of the genus Arganiella Giusti
& Pezzoli, 1980 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Hy-
drobiidae) from the Iberian Península. Gra-
ellsia, 63: 61-70.
Arconada B. y Ramos M.A. 2007b. Arganiella
wolfi, new combination for Boetersiella wolfi
(Boeters & Glóer, 2007). Graellsia, 63: 367-
369.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Al Dr. Pablo Hidalgo Fernández,
magnifico hacedor de mapas y mejor
paciente compañero.
Barea-Azcón J.M., Ballesteros-Duperón E.
y Moreno D. (coords.) 2008. Libro Rojo de
los Invertebrados de Andalucía, 4 Tomos.
Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de An-
dalucía, Sevilla, 1430 pp.
Bech M. 1990. Fauna malacológica de Catalunya.
Mol.luscs terrestres id'aigua dolga. Treballs de
la Institució Catalana d Historia Natural, n°.
12, Barcelona, 229 pp.
Bech M. y Altimira J. 2003. Nuevas aporta-
ciones al conocimiento de los moluscos ac-
tuales y del cuaternario en Extremadura: I.
Malacofauna dulceacuícola. Revista de Estu-
dios Extremeños, LIX/II: 837-870.
Boeters H.D. 1987. Moitessieriidae und Hy-
drobiidae in Spanien un Portugal. Archivfür
Molluskenkunde, 118: 181-261.
Boeters H.D. y Glóer P. 2007. A contribution
to the genus Boetersiella Arconada & Ramos
2001 in Spain with the description of Boeter-
siella wolfi n. sp. Heldia, 5: 85-88.
Bonada N., Rieradevall M. y Prat N. 2006.
Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and
macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-
climate streams of northern California. Jour-
nal ofthe North American Benthological Society,
25: 32-43.
Directiva Marco del Agua. (Directiva
2000/60/ CE del Parlamento Europeo y del
Consejo, de 23 de octubre de 2000;
(http:/ /hispagua. cedex.es/ documenta-
ción/ especiales/ dma / index.htm).
Doadrio I. (ed.), 2002. Atlas y libro rojo de los pe-
ces continentales de España. CSIC-Ministerio de
Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 374 pp.
Fraga J y do Carmo L. 1954. L Identification
de Planorbis metidjensis, de TAlgarve (sud du
Portugal) d'aprés la morphologie des or ga-
nes genitaux et radula; sa comparaison avec
les mémes elements de Planorbis corneus. Bu-
lletin de la Societé de Pathologie Exotique, 47: 460-
468.
Franco A. 1994. Parque Natural Sierra de Ara-
cena y Picos de Aroche. Naturaleza e Historia. DI-
TEG, S.A., Madrid, 173 pp.
Galhano M.H. y Ferreira M.T. 1983. The
reproductive cycle of Anodonta cygnea L from
Mira Lagoon (Portugal). Publicagoes do
Instituto Zoologico "Dr. Augusto Nobre", 179:
1-4.
ló
PÉREZ-QuiNTERO: Moluscos dulceacuícolas de la Reserva “Dehesas de Sierra Morena
Gastón K.J. 1996. Species-range-size distribu-
tions: patterns, mechanisms and implica-
tions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11: 197-
201.
Gasull L. 1981. Fauna malacológica terrestre
y de agua dulce de la provincia de Castellón
de la Plana. Boletín de la Sociedad de Historia
Natural de las Baleares, 25: 55-102.
Gasull L. 1985. Fauna malacológica continen-
tal de la provincia de Huelva (España). Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 9: 127-143.
Glóer P. 2002. Die Süswassergastropoden Nord-
und Mitteleuropas. ConchBooks, Hackenheim,
327 pp.
Glóer P. y Meier-brook C. 2003. Süsswasser-
mollusken. DJN, Hamburg, 134 pp.
Gómez B., Moreno D., Rolán E., Araujo R. y
álvarez R. (eds.), 2001. Protección de Molus-
cos en el Catálogo Nacional de Especies Amena-
zadas. Sociedad Española de Malacología,
Reseñas Malacológicas XI, Madrid, 286 pp.
González G., Puig M.A., Tort M.J. y Prat, N.
1981. Distribución de Potamopyrgus jenkinsi
en las cuencas de los ríos Besos y Llobregat.
Iberus, 1: 61-66.
Gordon N.D., Mcmahon T.A., Finlayson B.L.,
Gippel C.J. y Nathan R.J. 2004. Stream Hy-
drology. An introduction for Ecologists. Wiley,
West Sussex, 429 pp.
Graca M.A.S., Fonseca D.m. y Castro, T.
1989. The distribution of macroinvertebrate
communities in two Portuguese rivers. Fresh-
water Biology, 22: 297-308.
GráciO M.A.A. 1983. Distribution and hábi-
tats of six species of freshwater pulmonates
snail in Algarve, Southern Portugal. Malaco-
logical Review, 16: 17-23.
Hermida J. y Rodríguez T. 1996. Contribución
a la fauna de caracoles terrestres y dulcea-
cuícolas de Portugal. Boletín de la Real Socie-
dad Española de Historia Natural (Biol.): 106-108.
Hinz W., Boeters H.D. y Günther A. 1994. Zur
SübwassermoHuskenfauna in der spanischen
Provinz Cuenca. Malakologische Abhandlungen,
5: 65-82.
Ibáñez M. y Alonso M.R. 1977. Geographical
distribution of Potamopyrgus jenkinsi in Spain.
Journal of Conchology, 29: 141-146.
Irvine K. 2004. Classifying ecological status
under the European Water Framework Di-
rective: the need for monitoring to account
for natural variability. Acjuatic Conservation:
Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 14: 107-
112.
IUCN, 1994. Guidelines for Protected Areas Man-
agement Categories. IUCN, Cambridge.
Jiménez J. y Martínez F. 1988. Distribución y
composición específica de la malacofauna
del río Júcar. Eimnética, 4: 9-18.
Killeen I., Aldridge D. y Oliver G. 2004. Fresh-
water Bivalves ofBritain and Ireland. FSC, En-
vironment Agency, AIDGAP, Wales, 114 pp.
Kuiper J.G.J. 1961. Contribution a la connais-
sance de espéces du genre Pisidium vivant en
Espagne. Basteria, 25: 54-67.
Lake P.S. 2003. Ecological effects of perturba-
tion by drought in flowing waters. Freshwa-
ter Biology, 48: 1161-1172.
Logan P. y Furse M. 2002. Preparing for the Eu-
ropean Water Framework Directive making
the links between habitat and aquatic biota.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater
Ecosystems, 12: 425-437.
López J.A. (dir.), 1998. Atlas hidrogeológico de
Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía, Instituto Tec-
nológico Geominero de España, Madrid, 216
pp.
Marazanof F. 1966. Mol.lusques aquatiques
des marismas du Guadalquivir: donnes eco-
logiques et biogeographiques. Anuales de
Eimnologie, 2: 477-489.
Martínez-Ortí A. y Robles F. 2003. Moluscos
continentales de la Comunidad Valenciana. Ge-
neralitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Terri-
tori i Habitatge, Valencia, 259 pp.
Martínez-Ortí A., Aparicio M.t. y Robles F.
2004. La malacofauna de la Sierra de Alcaraz
(Albacete, España). Iberus, 22 (2): 9-17.
Moura G., Vilarinho L., Guides R. y
Machado J. 2000. The action of some heavy
metáis on the calcification process of Anodonta
cygnea: nacre morphology and composition
changes. Haliotis, 29: 43-53.
Mouthon J. y Daufresne M. 2006. Effects of
the 2003 heatwave and climatic warming on
mollusc communities of the Saone: a large
lowland river and of its two main tributaries
(France). Global Change Biology, 12: 441-449.
Nieser N. y Montes C. 1984. Eista faunística y
bibliográfica de los Heterópteros acuáticos (Ne-
pomorpha & Gerromorpha) de España y Portu-
gal. Asociación Española de Limnología, pu-
blicación n° 2, Madrid, 190 pp.
Nobre A. 1941. Fauna Malacológica de Portugal
II. Moluscos terrestres efluviais. Coimbra Edi-
tora, Coimbra, 278 pp.
Oliveira A. de y Martínez-Ortí A. 2007. Stag-
nicolapalustris (O.F. Müller, 1744) (Pulmonata:
Lymnaeidae): novo registro para a fauna ma-
lacológica de Portugal. Noticiario SEM, 48:
27-30.
Ortiz de Zárate A. y Ortiz de Zárate A.
1961. Moluscos terrestres recogidos en la
provincia de Huelva. Boletín de la Real Socie-
dad Española de Historia Natural (B),59: 169-190.
Pérez-Quintero J.C., Bech M. y Huertas J.L.
2004. Los moluscos de las aguas continenta-
les de la provincia de Huelva. Iberus, 22 (2):
19-31.
Pérez-Quintero J.C. 2007. Diversity, habitat
use and conservation of freshwater molluscs
in the lower Guadiana River basin (SW Iber-
ian Península). Aquatic Conservation: Marine
and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17: 485-501.
17
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Pires A.M., Cowx I.G. y Coelho M.M. 2000.
Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of in-
termittent streams in the middle reaches of
the Guadiana basin (Portugal). Hydrobiologia,
435:167-175.
Pleguezuelos J.M., Márquez R. y Lizana M.
(eds.), 2002. Atlas y libro rojo de los anfibios y
reptiles de España. Organismo Autónomo de
Parques Nacionales, Madrid, 587 pp.
Pollard P. y Huxham M. 1998. The European
Water Framework Directive: a new era in
the management of aquatic ecosystem he-
alth? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Fresh-
water Ecosystems, 8: 773-792.
Pozuelo I. Gañán C. y Martín R. 2005. Atlas
de Andalucía, Cartografía ambiental 2. Junta de
Andalucía, Consejería de Medio Ambiente,
Sevilla, 285 pp.
Prenda J. 1997. Caracterización ecológica y
análisis comparativo de algunos cursos de
agua de la sierra norte de Sevilla (España).
Oxyura, 9: 101-124.
Pujante A.M., Tapia G. y Martínez F. 1998. Los
moluscos de los ríos de la Comunidad Va-
lenciana (España). Iberus, 16 (1): 1-19.
Rallo A. y Rico E. 1993. La familia Ancylidae
y Acroloxidae en los ríos del País Vasco. Bo-
letín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Na-
tural ( B ), 89: 73-81.
Ramos M.A. y Aparicio M.T. 1985. Gasteró-
podos terrestres y dulceacuícolas de las la-
gunas de Ruidera (España). Iberus, 5: 113-
123.
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 2004. The
Convention on Wetlands. Ramsar Convention
Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
Revenga C y Kura Y. 2003. Status and Trends
of Biodiversity oflnland Water Ecosystems. Se-
cretariat of the Convention on Biological Di-
versity, Technical Series no 11, Montreal, 115
pp.
Ricciardi A. y Rasmussen J.B. 1999. Extinc-
tion Rates of North American Freshwater
Fauna. Conservation Biology, 13: 1220-1222.
Rico E., Pérez L.C. y Montes C. 1990. Lista
faunística y bibliográfica de los Hydradephaga ( Co-
leóptera: Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Gyrinidae, No-
teridae, Dytiscidae) de la Península Ibérica e Is-
las Baleares. Asociación Española de Limno-
logía, publicación n° 7, Madrid, 216 pp.
Rolan E., Vilas F. y Nombela M.A. 1987. Fauna
malacológica de los estuarios-lagoones y sus
variaciones por cambios de salinidad. Ibe-
rus, 7 (1): 59-65.
Sampaio M.l., Fraga J. y Mattos M.A. 1973.
Studies on the distribution and ecology of
Lymnaea truncatula intermediate host of Fas-
ciola hepática in Portugal. Malacologia, 14: 348.
Sánchez A., Alba J. y Tierno J.M. 2002. Lista
faunística y bibliográfica de los Plecópteros ( Pie -
coptera) de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares.
Asociación Española de Limnología, publi-
cación n° 16, Madrid, 198 pp.
Segurado P. y Araújo M.B. 2004. An evalua-
tion of methods for modelling species dis-
tributions. Journal of Biogeography, 31: 1555-
1568.
Simóes M. 1988. Potamopyrgus jenkinsi sua dis-
tribuyo em Portugal. Iberus, 8 (2): 243-244.
Soler J., Moreno D., Araujo R. y Ramos M.B.
2006. Diversidad y distribución de los mo-
luscos de agua dulce en la comunidad de
Madrid (España). Graellsia, 62: 201-252.
Sousa R., Antunes C. y Guilhermino L. 2007.
Species composition and monthly variation
of the Molluscan fauna in the freshwater sub-
tidal area of the River Minho estuary. Estua-
rine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75: 90-100.
Valente M.F. y Vicente M.M.J. 1979. Gaste-
rópodes de água doce de Portugal. 1. Nota
sobre duas espécies da familia Lymnaeidae.
Boletín de la Sociedad Portuguesa de Ciencias Na-
turales, 19: 87-94.
Vannote R.Ll, Minshall G.W., Cummins
K.W., Sedell J.R. y Cushing C.E. 1980. The
River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal
ofFisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37: 130-137.
Velasco J.L. 1990. Lista faunística y bibliográfica
de los Rotíferos ( Rotatoria ) de la Península Ibérica
e Islas Baleares y Canarias. Asociación Española
de Limnología, publicación n° 8, Madrid, 195
pp.
Verdú J.R. y Galante E. (eds.) 2006. Libro Rojo
de los Invertebrados de España. Dirección Ge-
neral para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de
Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 411 pp.
Vidal-Abarca R. y Suárez M.L. 1985. Lista
faunística y bibliográfica de los moluscos ( Gas -
trópoda & Bivalvia) de las aguas continentales de
la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Asociación
Española de Limnología, publicación n° 2,
Madrid, 193 pp.
Vidal-Abarca M.R., Gómez R. y Suárez, M.L.
1991. Los planórbidos de las aguas superfi-
ciales de la cuenca del río Segura: SE de Es-
paña. Iberus, 10 (1): 119-129.
Villa A. y Hernández J. 2003. Dehesas de Sie-
rra Morena. Reserva de la Biosfera. Junta de
Andalucía, Consejería de Medio Ambiente,
Sevilla, 120 pp.
WORLDWIDE BlOCLIMATIC CLASSIFICATION SYS-
TEM. Phytosociological Research Center.
(http: / / www.ucm.es / info / cif / map / MN50
W020.htm).
18
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas, 27 (1): 19-56, 2009
Fauna malacologica de un fondo detrítico fangoso en El
Maresme, Barcelona (nordeste de la Península Ibérica)
Malacological fauna from a detritic muddy bottom in El Maresme,
Barcelona (Nordeast of the Iberian Península)
Anselmo PEÑAS*, Emilio ROLÁN** y José ALMERA***
Recibido el 21 -V-2008. Aceptado el 15-1-2009
RESUMEN
Se hace un listado de los moluscos marinos encontrados en un fondo detrítico fangoso en
El Maresme, entre las localidades de Vilassar de Mar y Matará, NE de la Península Ibé-
rica. En total se han recogido 332 especies (5 poliplacóforos, 219 gasterópodos, 105
bivalvos y 3 escafópodos). Todo el material se obtuvo mediante varios dragados realiza-
dos entre los años 2001 y 2006. Se ha tratado de reconocer las especies que viven en
ese tipo de fondo, por lo que en el listado se indican las especies recolectadas vivas y las
que son fruto de tanatocenosis de fondos más costeros. Se hacen comentarios sobre algu-
nas de estas especies, en especial sobre los de la superfamilia Galeommatoidea y se
muestran fotografías de algunas de ellas. Seis especies se citan por primera vez para el
Mediterráneo español.
ABSTRACT
The marine molluscs found in a detritic mud bottom in Maresme, between the localities of
Vilassar de Mar and Matará, NE of the Iberian Península, are listed. In total, 332 species
(5 Polyplacophora, 219 Gastropoda, 105 Bivalvia and 3 Scaphopoda) were collected.
All the material was obtained from several dredgings made between the years 2001 and
2006. In order to know which species are living in this bottom, the list mentions which
species were collected alive and which are thanatocaenosis originating from more Coastal
bottoms. Some comments on several species are made, mainly on the superfamily Gale-
ommatoidea, showing photographs of some of them. Six species are the first record for the
Spanish Mediterranean.
INTRODUCCIÓN
El presente trabajo trata sobre los
moluscos marinos que se han encon-
trado en un fondo detrítico fangoso del
piso circalitoral en el Maresme, entre
las localidades de Vilassar de Mar y
Mataré, al norte de la provincia de
Barcelona, recolectados mediante dra-
gados realizados entre los años 2001 y
2006, a una profundidad de unos 45
metros. El fondo estudiado cubre un
área muy reducida en extensión pero
muy rico en especies de moluscos, la
mayoría de los cuales se encontraron
vivos.
* Carrer Olérdola, 39 -5o, 08800 Vilanova i la Geltrú, Barcelona, anspml@yahoo.es
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela
*** Camí de Cabrils “Can Escarramant”, 6, 08349 Cabrera de Mar, Barcelona
19
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Varios son los trabajos realizados
sobre la fauna asociada a este tipo de
fondos, pero no hemos encontrado
ninguno referido a los moluscos en
aguas del Mediterráneo español.
Alonso y López-Jamar (1988) solo
tratan tangencialmente la malacofauna
de estos fondos, centrándose en el
estudio de los poliquetos.
ZONA DE ESTUDIO
El lugar objeto de estudio (Fig. 1) se
encuentra a unos 45 metros de profundi-
dad, a 5,5 kms de Mataré y 4,8 kms de
Vilassar de Mar (41° 29' 04" N, 2o 29' 05"
E), al norte de la provincia de Barcelona.
Se trata de una zona en mar abierto, sin
áreas abrigadas cercanas, ni tampoco
fondos rocosos cercanos. Los fondos,
entre el área de la biocenosis estudiada
y la costa, lo forman, en primer lugar, la
zona litoral, constituida por arenas más
bien gruesas. A continuación, entre los 8
y 20 metros de profundidad, que en
algún punto llega a los 24 m, se encuen-
tra una extensa pradera de Posidonia oce-
ánica, cuya fauna malacológica fue estu-
diada por Peñas y Almera (2001). Entre
esta pradera y la zona de estudio se
encuentra un fondo de arenas relativa-
mente gruesas, con mayor proporción
de fango a medida que aumenta la pro-
fundidad, poblado en parte por Cymodo-
cea nodosa en la zona más próxima a la
pradera de P. oceánica.
Se tomaron también varias muestras
a mayor profundidad del área objeto de
este estudio, hasta los 65 metros, cuyos
resultados no se reflejan aquí, pero se
constató que entre los 50 y 65 metros de
profundidad apenas se encontraban
especies vivas, tampoco moluscos, ni
siquiera bivalvos, y la mayoría de las
conchas o restos encontrados eran sub-
fósiles.
El fondo estudiado es detrítico
fangoso, con predominio del fango
sobre las arenas (Pérés, 1982), las cuales
son silíceas, de granulometría fina.
También se encuentran fragmentos de
conchas, mayoritariamente de bivalvos,
así como restos de erizos, crustáceos.
briozoos, escamas y espinas de peces y
foraminíferos. La mayor proporción de
materia orgánica obtenida es vegetal,
formada por hojas y raices procedentes
de las cercanas praderas de Cymodocea
nodosa y, en menor cantidad, de Posido-
nia oceánica.
En esta biocenosis, rica en biodiver-
sidad, se han encontrado vivas gran
número de especies de invertebrados,
además de moluscos. Entre ellas, son
comunes la Holothuria tubulosa Gmelin,
1790, el erizo Spatangus purpureus (O. F.
Müller, 1776), la estrella Astropecten irre-
gularis (Pennant, 1777), los ofiuros
Ophiura albida Forbes, 1839 y Ophiura
texturata Lamarck, 1816, crustáceos del
género Ebalia, los serpúlidos Serpula ver-
micularis (Linnaeus, 1767) y Spirorbis
pagenstecheri (Quatrefages, 1865). Son
abundantes el gusano poliqueto Ditrupa
arietina (O. F. Müller, 1776), el sipuncú-
lido Phascolion strombi (Montagu, 1804),
anfípodos de la superfamilia Gammari-
dea y el ascidiáceo Ascidia conchilega (O.
F. Müller, 1776), especie que aporta el
mayor volumen de biomasa animal
obtenida.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
El presente trabajo está basado en el
material recolectado por los autores
entre los años 2001 y 2006, mediante 12
dragados, todos realizados en los meses
de Julio y Agosto, salvo uno, que se hizo
en Abril de 2003. Las muestras se
tomaron desde una pequeña embarca-
ción pesquera, denominada BOLERA,
del tipo "llagut". Los nueve primeros
muéstreos se hicieron mediante una
pequeña draga rectangular de malla
metálica, de dimensiones 0,6 m de
ancho por 1 m de fondo y 0,25 m de
altura, y los 3 últimos mediante una
draga de arco, de 0,6 m, con una red de
1 m de larga, con una luz de malla de 1
mm. La draga se izaba manualmente y
en cada jornada de dragado, una vez
desechado el fango y arenas finas, se
obtuvieron unos 20 litros de sedimentos,
casi un 80% de cuyo volumen lo consti-
tuían restos vegetales.
20
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figura 1 . Mapa de la zona de muestreo.
Figure 1. Map of the sampling are a.
Todo el material estudiado e ilus-
trado se encuentra depositado en la
colección del primer autor, por lo que no
se menciona este dato en el material
estudiado ni en las representaciones
fotográficas.
Se han fotografiado varias especies,
la mayoría al microscopio electrónico de
barrido (MEB), por su rareza o por
aportar información adicional.
Las medidas que se aportan en las
figuras son la altura para los gasterópo-
dos y la longitud para las bivalvas.
El listado de especies ha sido confec-
cionado básicamente de acuerdo con la
nomenclatura de la CLEMAM (Check
List of European Marine Mollusca:
http: / / www.somali.asso.fr/ clemam/bi
otaxis.php).
Abreviaturas utilizadas:
BMNH Nacional History Museum,
London
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
MNHN Muséum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, París
c: concha
e: ejemplar encontrado vivo, o con
restos de partes blandas
v: valva
RESULTADOS
El número total de especies de
moluscos marinos recogidos en este
trabajo es de 332 (5 poliplacóforos, 219
gasterópodos, 105 bivalvos y 3 escafópo-
dos). De ellas, se han encontrado 213
especies vivas (4 poliplacóforos, 122 gas-
terópodos, 85 bivalvos y 2 escafópodos);
por tanto, consideramos que la mayoría
de ellas viven asociadas a este tipo de
fondos.
El listado de las especies se recoge
en la Tabla I. A la izquierda aparece el
nombre de cada especie, que irá en
negrita en el caso de que sea objeto de
comentarios en la discusión; irá prece-
dida de un asterisco (*) cuando consti-
tuya primera cita para el Mediterráneo
español. A continuación se señala la
abundancia relativa: +: solo encontrados
1-2 ejemplares en el total de muéstreos;
21
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Tabla I. Listado de las especies encontradas en el área de estudio. Las especies en negrita se comen-
tan en el texto. Códigos: *: primera cita para el Mediterráneo español; +: 1-2 ejemplares; ++: 3-10
ejemplares; +++: especie común, entre 11 y 100 ejemplares; ++++: abundante, más de 100 ejem-
plares, encontrada en todos los muéstreos; m: solo encontradas conchas vacías o valvas, en el caso
de bivalvos.
Table I. List ofthe species found in the study area. The species in bold are commented in the text. Code:
*: first record for the Spanish Mediterranean ; +: 1-2 specimens; ++: 3-10 specimens; + + +: common
species, between 11 and 100 specimens; + + + +: very common, more than 100 specimens, found in all
the samplings ; m: only empty shells ofvalves, in the case of bivalves.
Clase POLYPLACOPHORA
Familia LEPTOCHITONIDAE
22
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
23
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
24
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
Familia MURICIDAE
25
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
26
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
Familia ANISOCYCLIDAE
Anisocycla gradata Moníerosato, 18/8
Anisocycla nitidísima (Montagu, 1 803)
Familia TJAERNOIIDAE
Tjaernoeia exquisita (Jeffreys, 1 883)
Familia ACTEONIDAE
Acteon tornatilis (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia DIAPHANIDAE
Diaphanad. crética (Forbes, 1844)
Diaphana minuta Brown, 1 827
Familia RETUSIDAE
Retusa mammillata (Philippi, 1 836)
Retusa truncatula (Bruguiére, 1 792)
Cyliciinina crebrisculpta Monterosato, 1 884
Cylichnina umbilicata (Montagu, 1 803)
Pyrunculus hoernesii (Weinkauff, 1 866)
I /olvulella acuminata (Bruguiére, 1 792)
Familia RINGICULIDAE
Ringicula conformis Monterosato, 1 877
Familia HAMINOEIDAE
Haminoea hydatis (Linnaeus, 1 758)
Atys ¡effreysi (Weinkauff, 1 866)
Weinkauffia turgidula (Forbes, 1 844)
Familia PHILINIDAE
Philine angulata Jeffreys, 1 867
Philine aperta (Linnaeus, 1767)
Philine intricata (Monterosato, 1875)
Philine scabra (Müller, 1784)
* Jobania retifera (Forbes, 1 844)
* Laona fíexuosa (M. Sars, 1 870)
Laona pruinosa (W. Clark, 1 827)
Familia CYLICHNIDAE
Cylichna cylindracea (Pennant, 1 777)
Roxania utriculus (Brocchi, 1814)
Scaphander lignarius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia CAVOLINIDAE
Cavolinia inflexa (Lesueur, 1813)
Clio pyramidata Linnaeus, 1767
Creseis acicula Rang, 1 828
Creseis virgula Rang, 1828
Familia LIMACINIDAE
Limacina inflata (d'Orbigny, 1 836)
Familia PLEUROBRANCHIDAE
Bertbella sp.
Familia UMBRACULIDAE
+ m
Umbraculum mediterraneum (Lamarck, 1819) ++
Familia APLYSIIDAE
Aplysia depilans Gmelin, 1791 ++
Aplysia fascista Poiret, 1789 ++
27
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
Clase BIVALVIA
Familia NUCULIDAE
Nuculo nitldosa Winckworth, 1930
Nucula sulcoto Bronn, 1831
Familia NUCULANIDAE
Nuculana commutata (Philippi, 1 844)
Nuculana pella (Linnaeus, 1 767)
Familia ARCIDAE
Arca tetrágono Poli, 1795
Sarbatia clathrata (Defrance, 1816)
Anadara corbuloldes (Monterosato, 1 878)
Batbyarca pectunculoides (Scacchi, 1 834)
Batbyarca philippiana (Nyst, 1 848)
Familia NOETIIDAE
Striarca lácteo (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia GLYCYMERIDAE
Glycymerls bimaculata (Poli, 1 795)
Glycymerls glycymerls (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia MYTILIDAE
Gregariella semlgranata (Reeve, 1858)
Musculus subpictus (Cantraine, 1835)
Musculus costulatus (Risso, 1826)
Modlolus barbatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Modiolus adriaticus (Lamarck, 1819)
Modiolula phaseolina (Philippi, 1844)
Familia PECTINIDAE
Pecten ¡acobeus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Aequipecten commutatus (Monterosato, 1875)
Aequipecten opercularis (Linnaeus, 1758)
Lissopecten byalinus (Poli, 1795)
Palllolum incomparablle (Risso, 1 826)
Simillpecten similis (Laskey, 1811)
Crassadoma multlstriata (Poli, 1 795)
Cblamys flexuosa (Poli, 1 795)
Chlamys pesfells (Linnaeus, 1758)
Cblamys varia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Familia ANOMIIDAE
Anomia epblppium Linnaeus, 1758
Pododesmus patelllformis (Linnaeus, 1761)
Familia LIMIDAE
[¡mea loscombii (G. B. Sowerby 1, 1824)
Llmatula subaurlculata (Montagu, 1 808)
Familia LUCINIDAE
Lucinella divarícata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Anodonta fragills (Philippi, 1 836)
Myrtea splnifera (Montagu, 1 803)
Luclnoma borealis (Linnaeus, 1767)
Familia THYASIRIDAE
Jbyasira alleni Carroza, 1981
Jbyasira bipllcata (Philippi, 1 836)
++++
++
++
+ m
++
++
++
+++
++
++ m
++
++++
++
++
+++
++++
++ m
+++
+
++
++++
++ m
+ m
++
++++
++
+++
+++
+++
+++
++++
Figs. 47-49
28
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
29
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Tabla I. Continuación.
Table I. Continuation.
Familia PSAMMOBIIDAE
Gari costulata (Turton, 1 822) ++
Gari fervensis (Gmelin, 1/91) +++
Familia SEMELIDAE
Ervilia castanea (Montagu, 1 803) +
Abra alba (W. Wood, 1 802) ++++
Abra prismática (Montagu, 1 808) ++++
Familia SOLECURTIDAE
Solecurtus scopula (Turton, 1 822) +
Azorinus cbamasolen (da Costa, 1778) ++
Familia TRAPEZIIDAE
Coralliophaga litbopbagella (Lamarck, 1819) ++
Familia VENERIDAE
Venus casino Linnaeus, 1758 ++
Clausinella fasciata (da Costa, 1778) +++
Jimoclea ovata (Pennant, 1 777) ++++
Gouldia mínima (Montagu, 1 803) ++++
Dosinia lupinus (Linnaeus, 1 7 58) ++++
Pitar mediterráneo (Tiberi, 1 855) +++
Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758) ++
Papbia aurea (Gmelin, 1 79 1 ) +++
Familia CORBULIDAE
Corbula gibba (Olivi, 1792) ++++
Familia HIATELLIDAE
Hiatella árctico (Linnaeus, 1767) +++
Saxicavella jeffreysi Winkworth, 1 930 +
Familia XYLOPHAGIDAE
Xylophaga dorsalis (Turton, 1819) ++
Xylophaga praestans E. A. Smith, 1 903 ++
Familia THRACIIDAE
Thracia papyracea (Poli, 1791) ++
Thracia villosiuscula (MacGillivray, 1 827) +++
Familia PANDORIIDAE
Pandora pinna (Montagu, 1 803) ++++
Familia LYONSIIDAE
Lyonsia norwegica (Gmelin, 1791) +++
Familia P0R0MYIDAE
Poromya granulata (Nyst y Westerdorp, 1 839) +
Familia CUSPIDARIIDAE
Cuspidaria cuspidata (Olivi, 1792) +++
Cuspidaria rostrata (Spengler, 1793) +
Cardiomya costellata (Deshayes, 1 835) +++
Clase SCAPHOPODA
Familia DENTAUIDAE
Dentalium inaequicostatum Bucquoy, Dautzenb. y Dollfus, 1981 ++++
Dentalium panormum Chenu, 1858 ++
Familia GADILIDAE
Dischides politus (S. Wood, 1 842) ++++
m
m
Figs. 87-92
Figs. 93-95
m
30
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
++: entre 3 y 10 ejemplares encontrados;
+++: especie común, encontrada en casi
todos los muéstreos; ++++: especie
abundante, numerosos ejemplares
encontrados en todos los muéstreos. En
la siguiente columna se indican con una
(m) las especies de las que sólo se han
encontrado conchas vacías, o solo
valvas, en el caso de bivalvos, indicando
con ello que probablemente no habitan
estos fondos. En la última columna se
señalan con un número las especies ilus-
tradas, indicando dicho número con el
de la figura correspondiente.
DISCUSIÓN
Comentarios sobre algunos taxones
De la mayoría de especies aquí
citadas existen fotografías y descripcio-
nes actualizadas en la literatura. En este
apartado nos hemos limitado a comen-
tar algunos taxones que nos han pare-
cido de mayor interés, por su rareza o
porque se aporta nueva información
sobre ellos. De todas esas especies
reportamos fotografías, la mayoría al
microscopio electrónico de barrido
(MEB).
Leptochiton cimicoides (Monterosato, 1879) (Figs. 2-4)
Chiton cimicoides Monterosato, 1879. Gior. Se. Nat. ed Econ., 14: 23 (nomen novum pro Chiton
minimus Monterosato, 1878, non Gmelin, 1791 nec Spengler, 1797)
Lepidopleurus intermedius Salvini-Plawen, 1968. Ann. Nat. Mus. Wien, 72: 251, láms. 6-8, figs. 44-57.
Material examinado: 4 e.
Maluquer (1915) cita esta especie Rosellón francés, pero la creía ausente de
como Chiton minimus Monterosato, 1872 aguas de Cataluña. Se cita aquí por
para aguas cercanas del Golfo de León y primera vez para el Mediterráneo español.
Callochiton calcatus Dell' Angelo y Palazzi, 1994 (Fig. 5)
Callochiton calcatus Dell' Angelo y Palazzi, 1994. La Conchiglia, 26 (273): 15, figs. 1-12, 14-19, 20B.
[Localidad tipo: Villasimius, Cagliari, 80-100 m],
Chiton laevis var. navícula Jeffreys, 1865 (nomen dubium).
Material examinado: 2 e.
Esta especie la citan Dell' Angelo y
Smriglio (2001) para las Islas Baleares
(Formentera) y consideran que proba-
blemente vive asociada a algas calcá-
reas, sin embargo en la zona de estudio
las arenas son silíceas, muy alejadas de
fondos de maérl. Los ejemplares se
encontraron sobre valvas vacías de
bivalvos. Se cita aquí por primera vez
para aguas de la Península Ibérica.
Cerithiopsis harleei Jeffreys, 1867 (Fig. 9)
Cerithiopsis harleei Jeffreys, 1867. Brit. Conch., 4: 268.
Cerithiopsis acuminata Hallgas, 1985 ex Monterosato ms. Notiz. CISMA, 7 (1-2) 15, figs. 1-3.
Material examinado: 20 e en el área de estudio, más de 400 ejemplares en aguas próximas entre 25
y 100 m de profundidad.
Se confirma aquí el hábitat de esta Graham (1982) y por Lugli y Palazzi
especie, ya indicado por Fretter y (1991), quienes, además, consideran C.
31
Iberusy 27 (1), 2009
acuminata sinónimo júnior de C. barleei.
Todos los ejemplares aquí censados se
encontraron viviendo dentro de la
esponja Suberites domuncula (Olivi,
1792), de la que se alimentan. En ocasio-
nes se han encontrado más de 10 ejem-
plares dentro de una esponja. Esta
esponja se desarrolla sobre conchas ocu-
padas por el cangrejo ermitaño Paguris-
tes oculatus (Fabricius, 1775).
Cerithiopsis sp. (Figs. 6, 7)
Material examinado: 1 c.
A primera vista esta concha parece una
forma más pequeña de C. tubercularis, sin
embargo la protoconcha presenta algunas
diferencias, además de tener una menor
altura: en C. tubercularis (Fig. 8) es lisa, con
un cordoncillo, a modo de carena, justo
sobre la sutura y un principio de costillas
axiales justo bajo ella, mientras que en C.
sp. sobre el cordoncillo suprasutural se
encuenta un surco más ancho lleno de
minúsculos gránulos. Otras especies, como
C. barleei tienen una protoconcha diferente
(Fig. 9). El hallazgo de una sola concha no
nos permite apreciar diferencias suficien-
tes para su descripción como nueva
especie. El ejemplar mide 2.6 x 0.8 mm.
Género Bela Leach in Gray, 1847
Bela brachystoma (Philippi, 1844)
(Figs. 10, 11). En este fondo es la especie
más abundante entre los gasterópodos,
de la que se han encontrado más de 600
especímenes y gran número de conchas.
Bela clarae Peñas y Rolán, 2008 y Bela
menkhorsti van Aartsen, 1988. Ver en
Peñas, Rolán y Ballesteros (2008)
descripción de la primera y comentarios
sobre ambas especies.
Bela laevigata (Philippi, 1836). No ha
sido encontrado ningún ejemplar ni
concha vacía en este fondo, ni tampoco
en la cercana pradera de P. oceánica (Pe-
ñas y Almera, 2001). Después del estu-
dio del material tipo de Raphitoma zonata
Locard, 1892, ocho sintipos del MNHN,
se considera que esta especie es sinó-
nimo de B. laevigata. Se ilustran aquí tres
conchas del material tipo (Figs. 19-21).
Bela ornata (Locard, 1892). Solamente
se han encontrado 4 conchas de esta
especie. Se ilustran aquí 3 sintipos del
MNHN, procedentes de St. Raphael,
Saint Tropez (Figs. 16-18).
Bela nébula (Montagu, 1803) (Figs. 14,
15). Test. Brit., 267, lám. 15, fig. 6. Junto
con B. brachystoma son las especies pre-
dominantes de este género y dominan-
tes entre los gasterópodos en esta bioce-
nosis, de la cual se han encontrado 180
ejemplares y más de 300 conchas. Péres
y Picard (1964) consideran esta especie
"característica preferente" de fondos
arenosos infralitorales denominados
"Sables Fins Bien Calibrés" (SFBC).
Picard (1965) la considera "caracterís-
tica exclusiva" y también Biagi y Corse-
lli (1984), quienes constatan, además,
que es el gasterópodo más abundante en
un fondo SFBC del Golfo de Baratti,
Italia. Sin embargo, la especie domi-
nante de este género en fondos SFBC
estudiados por nosotros en varias locali-
dades del infralitoral catalán es Bela lae-
vigata (Philippi, 1836).
Eulimella acicula Philippi, 1836 (Figs. 27, 28)
Melania acicula Philippi, 1836. Enum. Mollusc. Sicil., 135. [Localidad tipo: Pleistoceno de Sicilia].
Pyramis laevis Brown, 1827. III. Rec. Conch. G. Brit. and Ir., lám 50, figs. 51 y 52 (nomen dubium).
? Eulima subcylindrata Dunker in Weinkauff, 1862. Jour. Conchyl., 10, 342, lám. 13, fig. 7.
32
PEÑAS ET AL. : Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 2-4. Leptochiton cimicoides (Monterosato, 1879). 2: concha, 1,6 mm; 3: detalle del peri-
noto; 4: detalle de la microescultura de las valvas. Fig. 5. Callochiton calcatus Dell’Angelo y Palazzi,
1994, concha, 3,6 mm. Figuras 6, 7. Cerithiopsis sp. 6: concha, 2,3 mm; 7: protoconcha. Figura 8.
Protoconcha de Cerithiopsis tubercularis (Montagu, 1803). Figura 9. Protoconcha de Cerithiopsis
barleei Jeffreys, 1867.
Figures 2-4. Leptochiton cimicoides (Monterosato, 1879). 2: shell, 1.6 mm; 3: detail ofgirdle; 4:
detail ofvalve microsculpture. Fig. 5. Callochiton calcatus Dell’ Angelo and Palazzi, 1994, shell, 5.6
mm. Figures 6, 7. Cerithiopsis sp. 6: shell, 2.5 mm; 7: protoconch. Figura 8. Protoconch o/Cerithiop-
sis tubercularis ( Montagu , 1803). Figura 9. Protoconch o/Cerithiopsis barleei Jeffreys, 1867.
33
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Odostomia sállete var. compactilis Jeffreys, 1867. Brit. Conch., 4: 169.
Eulimella commutata Monterosato, 1884. Nomec. Genérica: 98.
Material examinado: 15 e, 80 c.
Después del estudio de más de 200
conchas procedentes del Mediterráneo,
Golfo de Vizcaya, África Occidental
(Mauritania) e Islas Canarias pertene-
cientes a este grupo, mantenemos la
opinión ya expresada en Peñas y Rolán
(1997) y dudamos de que existan dos
especies diferentes, según defienden
Nofroni y Tringali (1995). Ciertamente
existen dos formas extremas en cuanto
al diámetro y altura de la protoconcha y
diámetro de las primeras vueltas de la
teloconcha. La figura 28 correspondería
a E. subcylindrata, con un diámetro de
protoconcha de 235 jum y una altura de
125 jum, y con microescultura espiral en
la teloconcha; y la figura 27 correspon-
dería a E. acicula, con un diámetro de
protoconcha de 255 py una altura de
160 jum, sin microescultura espiral.
Ambas formas extremas proceden del
mismo fondo aquí estudiado. No obs-
tante, en este fondo y también en otros
estudiados se encuentran formas y diá-
metro de protoconchas intermedios,
ejemplares de ambos taxones con y sin
microescultura espiral; además, ambas
formas conviven en todas las profundi-
dades estudiadas y no se ha podido
constatar que una de ellas sea típica de
una determinada bicenosis o de una
determinada profundidad.
Turbonilla rufa (Philippi, 1836) (Figs. 29-32)
Melania rufa Philippi, 1836. Enum. Molí. Sic., 1: 156, lám. 9, fig. 7 [Localidad tipo: Magnisi, Sicilia].
Chemnitzia densecostata Philippi, 1844. Molí. Sic. II: 132, lám. 24, fig. 9.
Odostomia formosa Jeffreys, 1848. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 2 (2): 347, lám. 26, fig. 10.
Material examinado: 280 e, 140 c.
Solustri Y Micali (2004) siempre
encontraron esta especie en fondos are-
nosos (entre el 80% y 100% de arena), y
la consideran típica de esos fondos; sin
embargo, los más de 400 ejemplares
obtenidos, la mayoría vivos, en la zona
de estudio, que es un fondo detrítico
fangoso, no arenoso, nos inclina a
pensar que la causa de tal abundancia se
debe a la mayor o menor presencia de la
especie o especies a las que parasita.
Desconocemos con exactitud a qué espe-
cies parasita; probablemente el serpú-
lido Ditrupa.
Todos los ejemplares obtenidos en
esta biocenosis pertenecen a una de las
dos formas que se encuentran en el
Mediterráneo: concha unicolor, castaño
oscuro en ejemplares vivos o frescos,
estrecha, protoconcha con un diámetro
de unas 255-260 jum. Philippi (1836)
ilustra una concha monocolor y creemos
que nuestros ejemplares pertenecen a
esa forma. La concha ilustrada en Peñas
y Rolán (1997), procedente del Atlán-
tico sahariano pertenece a la forma más
ancha, bicolor, con un diámetro de pro-
toconcha de 300-310 ¡um. La protocon-
cha (Fig. 32) procedente de Mijas,
Málaga, pertenece a este segundo grupo
y también pertenece a esta forma la ilus-
trada en Fretter, Graham y Andrews
(1986), como T. crenata (Brown, 1827).
No hemos examinado el material tipo
de ninguna de ellas y, en consecuencia,
no podemos afirmar categóricamente
qué taxones son válidos y cuales sinóni-
mos, pero después del estudio de gran
cantidad de conchas del Mediterráneo y
Atlántico oriental, incluidas las proce-
dentes de las colecciones del MNCN y
del BMNH, nos inclinamos por la exis-
tencia de dos especies válidas: T. rufa y
T. crenata.
34
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 10, 11. Bela brachystoma (Philippi, 1844), 4,3 y 4,0 mm. Figuras 12, 13. Bela fuscata (Des-
hayes, 1833), 9,0 y 10,2 mm. Figuras 14, 15. Bela nébula (Montagu, 1803), 6,7 y 7,7 mm. Figuras
16-18. Bela ornata (Locard, 1897), 7,4, 7,6 y 6,5 mm, sintipos (MNHN). Figuras 19-21. Bela
zonata (Locard, 1892), 4,3, 6,4, 7,5 mm, sintipos (MNHN). Figura 22. Raphitoma aequalis Jef-
freys, 1867, 4,2 mm. Figura 23. Raphitoma cordieri (Payraudeau, 1826), 7,1 mm. Figura 24. Rap-
hitoma echinata (Brocchi, 1814), 9,6 mm.
Figures 10, 11. Bela brachystoma (Philippi, 1844), 4.3 and 4.0 mm. Figures 12, 13. Bela fuscata
(Deshayes, 1835), 9.0 and 10.2 mm. Figures 14, 15. Bela nébula (Montagu, 1803), 6.7 and 7.7 mm.
Figures 16-18. Bela ornata (Locard, 1897), 7.4, 7.6 and 6.5 mm, syntypes (MNHN). Figures 19-21.
Bela zonata (Locard, 1892), 4.3, 6.4 and 7.5 mm, syntypes (MNHN). Figure 22. Raphitoma aequa-
lis Jeffreys, 1867, 4.2 mm. Figure 23. Raphitoma cordieri (Payraudeau, 1826), 7.1 mm. Figure 24.
Raphitoma echinata (Brocchi, 1814), 9.6 mm.
35
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figuras 25, 26. Chrysallida multicostata (Jeffreys, 1884). 25: concha, 2 mm; 26: protoconcha.
Figuras 27, 28. Protoconchas de Eulimella acicula (Philippi, 1836). 27: forma subcylindrica ; 28:
forma acicula. Figuras 29-32. Turbonilla rufa (Philippi, 1836). 29, 30: conchas de 7,3 y 4,5 mm,
Vilassar; 31: protoconcha de un ejemplar de Vilassar; 32: protoconcha de un ejemplar de Mijas
Costa (Málaga).
Figures 25, 26. Chrysallida multicostata (Jejfreys, 1884), 25: shell, 2 mm; 26: protoconch. Figures 27,
28. Protoconcha ¿^Eulimella acicula (Philippi, 1836). 27: subcylindrica morph; 28: acicula morph.
Figures 29-32. Turbonilla rufa ( Philippi , 1836). 29, 30: shells 7.3 and 4.5 mm, Vilassar; 31: proto-
conch of a specimen from Vilassar; 32: protoconch of a specimen from Mijas Costa (Málaga).
36
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 33, 34. Diaphana minuta Brown, 1827. 33: concha, 4,3 mm; 34: protoconcha. Figuras 33,
36. Diaphana cf. crética (Forbes, 1844). 35: concha, 2,5 mm; 36: protoconcha. Figuras 37-39.
Cylichnina umbilicata (Montagu, 1803). 37: concha, 2,1 mm; 38: microescultura; 39: ápice.
Figures 33, 34. Diaphana minuta Brown, 1827. 33: shell, 4.3 mm; 34: protoconch. Figures 33, 36.
Diaphana cf. crética (Forbes, 1844). 33: shell, 2.3 mm; 36: protoconch. Figures 37-39. Cylichnina
umbilicata (Montagu , 1803). 37: shell, 2.1 mm; 38: microsculpture; 39: apex.
37
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Diaphana minuta Brown, 1827 (Figs. 33, 34)
Diaphana minuta Brown, 1827. Illust. Conch. Gr. Brit. And Ir., 1: lám. 38, figs. 7-8. [Localidad tipo:
Loch Torridon, Escocia, Gran Bretaña],
Amphisphyra expansa Jeffreys, 1865. Rep. Brit. Ass. Advanc. Sci., 1864: 330-332.
Material examinado: 3 c.
Esta especie, redescrita por Schi0tte
(1998), tiene una forma pentagonal, lisa,
salvo las líneas de crecimiento, espira acu-
minada o ligeramente cóncava, la última
vuelta ovalada de perfil; protoconcha
planctotrófica de unas 1.5 vueltas, con un
diámetro de unas 300 jum y un ángulo de
135° respecto al eje de la teloconcha.
Diaphana cf. crética (Forbes, 1844) (Figs. 35, 36)
Bulla crética Forbes, 1844. Rep. Brit. Ass. Advanc. Sci., 1843: 188. [Localidad tipo: Creta, 218 m].
Material examinado: 1 c.
A primera vista la concha de esta
especie parece más bien pertenecer a
Diaphana globosa (Lovén, 1846), citada
para el Atlántico norte europeo, por el
perfil globoso de la concha y espira más
claramente cóncava, mientras que D.
crética, especie mediterránea, tiene un
hombro más anguloso y la espira más
bien acuminada, con la protoconcha
emergida; sin embargo la primera tiene
una protoconcha mucho mayor, con un
diámetro mayor de 450 ¡um y unas 2
vueltas de media, mientras que D.
crética tiene una protoconcha menor de
370 jum y 1,7 vueltas, según SCHI0TTE
(1998). Nuestro ejemplar mide 2.5 x 2.2
mm y la protoconcha tiene un diámetro
de 320 jum con 1.3 vueltas, lo que nos
inclina a considerar nuestra especie más
cercana a D. crética. Se cita aquí por
primera vez para el Mediterráneo
español.
Johania retifera (Forbes, 1844) (Figs. 40-43)
Bulla retifera Forbes, 1844. Rept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci. (1843), 13: 187. [Localidad tipo: Seripho, Mar
Egeo],
Bulla vestita Philippi, 1844. Enum. Mollusc. Siciliae, vol 2: 95, lám. 20, fig. 4.
Material examinado: 3 e, 5 c.
Esta rara especie fue fotografiada
por primera vez por Piani y Turolla
(1980), apenas citada anteriormente,
quienes también discuten la sinonimia
con J. vestita. La concha (Fig. 40) es oval,
frágil, de color crema a castaño claro en
ejemplares vivos o frescos, blanquecino
en conchas muertas. La microescultura
(Fig. 41) está formada por un complejo
entramado con múltiples huecos comu-
nicados entre sí, y salientes en forma de
nodulos elevados en los cruces. La
rádula (Figs. 42, 43) se deshace fácil-
mente y parece estar formada por
dientes marginales con una base ancha,
cóncava, de la que parte una zona pro-
minente que se curva a su extremo.
Malaquias (2004, fig. 3-D) ilustra el
lectotipo de Philine trachyostraca Watson,
1897, cuya escultura no presenta dife-
rencias con la de /. retifera, aunque en la
forma de la concha de esa especie parece
más cercana a L. pruinosa.
Se cita aquí por primera vez para el
Mediterráneo español y por primera vez
se fotografía la rádula.
38
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 40-43 . Johania retifera (Forbes, 1844). 40: concha, 4,3 mm: 41: microescultura; 42, 43:
rádula. Figura 44. Laona flexuosa (M. Sars, 1870), concha, 4,4 mm. Figuras 45, 46. Laona pruinosa
(W. Clark, 1827). 45: concha, 3,5 mm; 46: detalle de la microescultura.
Figures 40-43. Johania retifera (Forbes, 1844). 40: shell, 4.3 mm: 41: microsculpture; 42, 43: radula.
Figure 44. Laona flexuosa (M. Sars, 1870), shell, 4.4 mm. Figures 45, 46. Laona pruinosa (W.
Clark, 1827). 45: shell, 3.5 mm; 46: detall ofthe microsculpture.
39
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figuras 47-49. Thyasira alleni Carroza, 1981, valvas, 2,3, 1,8 y 1,7 mm. Figuras 30, 51. Litigiella
glabra (P. Fischer in de Folin y Périer, 1873), valvas del mismo ejemplar, 2,9 mm. Figuras 52, 53.
Montacuta ferruginosa (Montagu, 1808), valvas del mismo ejemplar, 2,5 mm.
Figures 47-49. Thyasira alleni Carroza, 1981, valves, 2.3, 1.8 and 1.7 mm. Figures 50, 51. Litigiella
glabra (P. Fischer in de Folin and Périer, 1873), valves of the same specimen, 2,9 mm. Figures 52, 53.
Montacuta ferruginosa (Montagu, 1808), valves ofthe same specimen, 2.5 mm.
Laona flexuosa (M. Sars, 1870) (Fig. 44)
Philine flexuosa M. Sars, 1870. NytMag. Naturvid., 17: 113.
Philine membranácea Monterosato, 1880. Bull. Soc. Malac. Italiana, 6: 78 ( nomen nudum).
Material examinado: 1 e, 1 c.
Concha (Fig. 44) oval-globosa, muy
frágil, blanca, sin escultura salvo las
líneas de crecimiento, espira cóncava, la
última vuelta cubre las anteriores, labro
interior ligeramente incurvado hacia el
exterior, ombligo estrecho. Gaglini
(1991) ilustra una concha de la colec-
ción de Monterosato con la etiqueta
Philine membranácea, la cual tiene un
perfil más globoso que las aquí ilustra-
das, pero sin otras diferencias aprecia-
bles.
La presente es la primera cita para el
Mediterráneo español.
40
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 54-57. Montacuta goudi van Aartsen, 1996, valvas, 2,3, 2,1, 2,2 y 2,5 mm. 54, 55: visión
exterior; 56, 57: visión interior. Figuras 58-63. Mioerycina phascolionis (Dautzenberg y Fischer,
1925), valvas, 3,2, 2,3, 1,7, 2,5, 2,7 y 1,9 mm.
Figures 54-57. Montacuta goudi van Aartsen, 19 96, valves, 2.3, 2. 1, 2.2 and 2.5 mm. 54, 55: outer
view; 56, 57: inner view. Figures 58-63. Mioerycina phascolionis (Dautzenberg and Fischer, 1925),
valves, 3.2, 2.3, 1.7, 2.5, 2.7 and 1.9 mm.
41
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Laona pruinosa (W. Clark, 1827) (Figs. 45, 46)
Bullaea pruinosa W. Clark, 1827. Zool. Journ., 3 (11): 339-340 [Localidad tipo: Budley Salterton,
Devon, Inglaterra].
Philine granulosa M. Sars, 1869. Fórhandl. Vindesk. Krist., 246-275.
Material examinado: 2 e, 4 c.
Concha (Fig. 45) oval, frágil, color
crema, no transparente. La superficie
(Fig. 46) está formada por cordoncillos
espirales irregulares, muy rugosos, fácil-
mente desprendibles, y en ese caso la
superficie forma una fina retícula.
Las únicas citas anteriores para el
Mediterráneo español son las de
Giribet y Peñas (1997) para la comarca
del Garraf, Barcelona y la cita de
Oliver baldoví (2007) para Cullera, Va-
lencia.
Litigiella glabra (P. Fischer, 1873) (Figs. 50, 51)
Lepton glabrum P. Fischer, 1873. Les fonds de la mer (1873), 2: 83-84, lám. 2, fig. 9. [Localidad tipo:
Laredo, norte de España].
Erycina cuenoti Lamy, 1908. Jour. Conchyl., 56: 35-37, figs. 1-4..
Montacuta perezi Pelseneer, 1906. Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg., 12: 1146-1147.
Material examinado: 1 e + 2 v.
Se caracteriza por tener dos pequeños
dientes cardinales en la valva izquierda y
uno en la valva derecha y tener diente
lateral en ambas valvas. Hoeksema, van
Aartsen, Keukelaar-Van der Berge,
van Nieulande y Simons (1995) redes-
criben esta especie, citándola por primera
vez para aguas españolas en el Atlántico
(Huelva), Cantábrico (Laredo) y Medite-
rráneo (San Carlos de la Rápita y Calpe).
Bogi, Coppini y Margelli (1992) la citan
para aguas de Italia, y resaltan el perfil si-
nuoso del borde de ambas valvas en la
zona ventral y umbonal. Aquí se cita por
segunda vez para el Mediterráneo
español.
Montacuta ferruginosa (Montagu, 1808) (Figs. 52, 53)
My a ferruginosa Montagu, 1808. Test. Brit., 2 suppl.: 22, 166, lám. 26, fig. 2.
Tellimya oblonga Turton, 1822. A survey and illust. catalogue... (Molí. Bival.)
Erycina onodon Philippi, 1836. Enum. Mollusc. Siciliae.
Thracia elongata Philippi, 1844. Abbild. Und Bresch.
Material examinado: 5 v.
Concha (Figs. 52, 53) de perfil elíptico,
frágil, color blanco, periostraco delgado
amarillento, con depósitos ferruginosos,
resultado de las secreciones de los erizos
con los que vive de comensal; sin diente
cardinal, dientes laterales poco desarro-
llados, umbo situado en la mitad poste-
rior; la especie se identifica fácilmente
por la zona cóncava en el borde anterior
junto al umbo, determinando una especie
de diente. Especie típica de fondos detrí-
tico fangosos vive preferentemente
comensal con Echinocardium cordatum y
Spatangus purpureus.
Montacuta goudi van Aartsen, 1996 (Figs. 54-57)
42
PEÑAS ETAL.\ Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 64, 65. Montacuta semirubra Gaglini, 1992, valvas, 4,2 y 4,2 mm. Figuras 66, 67.
Montacuta substriata (Montagu, 1808). 66: dos conchas (ambas de 1,5 mm) adheridas a una espí-
cula de erizo; 67: detalle de una de ellas. Figuras 68-70. Montacuta tenella Lovén, 1846. 68, 69:
valvas del mismo ejemplar, 1,8 mm. 70: prodisoconcha.
Figures 64, 65. Montacuta semirubra Gaglini, 1992, valves, 4.2 and 4.2 mm. Figures 66, 67.
Montacuta substriata (Montagu, 1808). 66: two shells (both 1.5 mm) attached to an urchin spine; 67:
detail ofone ofthem. Figures 68-70. Montacuta tenella Lovén, 1846. 68, 69: valves ofthe same speci-
men, 1.8 mm. 70: prodissoconch.
43
Iberusy 27 (1), 2009
Montacuta goudi van Aartsen, 1996. La Conchiglia, 28 (281): 27, figs. 1L, IR, 2L, 2R. [Localidad tipo:
Punta Umbría, Huelva, España].
Material examinado: 5 e + 40 v.
Especie muy frágil, semitranspa-
rente, muy inequilateral, valvas algo
inchadas, con la charnela poco evidente,
sin diente cardinal. Descrita para aguas
atlánticas del sur de España (Punta
Umbría, Huelva) y de Canarias, fue
citada por primera vez para el Medite-
rráneo en Malta por Cachia, Mifsud y
Sammut (2004). Margeli et al. (2006) la
citan para Italia. Rueda, Salas y Gofas
(2000) la citan para la bahía de Barbate,
cerca del Estrecho de Gibraltar y Borja
y Mixika (2001) para el Golfo de
Vizcaya. Aquí se cita por primera vez
para el Mediterráneo español, siendo
común en el tipo de fondo estudiado.
Montacuta semirubra Gaglini, 1992 (Figs. 64, 65)
Montacuta semirubra Gaglini, 1992. Argonauta, 7, 1-6 (37): 178, figs. 165, 166. [Localidad tipo:
Palermo].
Montacuta semirubra Monterosato, 1872 (nomen nudum).
Montacuta cuneata Gaglini, 1992. Argonauta, 7, 1-6 (37): 178, figs. 163, 164.
Material examinado: 4 v.
Esta rara especie mediterránea fue
citada por Monterosato (1872) pero no
descrita; vive asociada a Spatangus pur-
pureus. Gaglini (1992) la describe coha-
bitando con Montacuta substriata. Se citó
por primera vez para aguas españolas
por Peñas y Giribet (2003) en la
comarca del Garraf (Barcelona), a una
profundidad de 105 m. Se cita aquí por
segunda vez para el Mediterráneo
español. Bogi y van Aartsen (2006) la
citan para varias localidades del Medite-
rráneo Central y Oriental hasta una pro-
fundidad de 400 m y defienden que esta
especie debería ubicarse en el género
Tellimya, tras el estudio de la charnela.
Montacuta substriata (Montagu, 1808) (Figs. 66, 67)
Ligula substriata Montagu, 1808. Test. Brit., 2, suppl. 25.
Material examinado: 25 e + 110 v.
Esta especie, caracterizada por sus
costillas radiales, tiene un periostraco
delgado de color castaño, muy brillante;
carece de diente cardinal y no tiene cla-
ramente desarrollado el diente lateral
posterior. Común en el área de estudio.
ha sido recolectada cogida por el biso a
las espinas de Spatangus purpureus (Fig.
66), erizo común en estos fondos.
Tebble (1976) la cita asociada también a
Echinocardium flavescens (O. F. Müller,
1776).
Montacuta tenella Lovén 1846 (Figs. 68-70)
Montacuta tenella Lovén, 1846. Index. Molí. Scand .: 43.
Decipula ovata Friele, 1876. Forh Viden. Selsk. Krist. (1875): 57.
Tellimya ovalis G. O. Sars, 1878. Molí. Reg. Arct. Norv.: 341, lám. 34, figs. la-c.
Material examinado: 3 v.
44
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 71-73. Kurtiella bidentata (Montagu, 1803), valvas, 2,7, 2,4 y 2,5 mm. Figuras 74-77.
Coracuta obliquata (Chaster, 1897). 75, 76: valvas, 1,9, 1,9 y 1,9 mm; 77: prodisoconcha.
Figures 71-73. Kurtiella bidentata ( Montagu , 1803), valves, 2.7, 2.4 and 2.5 mm. Figures 74-77.
Coracuta obliquata (Chaster, 1897). 75, 76: valves, 1.9, 1.9 and 1.9 mm; 77: prodissoconch.
45
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figuras 78-80. Kurtiella tumidula (Jeffreys, 1866). Valvas, 2,4, 2,4 y 2,5 mm. Figuras 81-83. Epi-
lepton clarkiae (W. Clark, 1852), valvas, 1,6, 2,4 y 1,6 mm.
Figures 78-80. Kurtiella tumidula (Jeffreys, 1866). Valves, 2.4, 2.4 and 2.5 mm. Figures 81-83.
Epilepton clarkiae (W. Clark, 1852), valves, 1.6, 2.4 and 1.6 mm.
Especie muy frágil, subelíptica, con
una charnela poco desarrollada, sin
diente cardinal. Kallonas, Zenetos y
Gofas (1999) la citan por primera vez
para el Mediterráneo, en Grecia, viviendo
asociada al equinodermo Brissopsis lyri-
fera (Forbes, 1841). Las citas posteriores
en el Mediterráneo son escasas: una
valva izquierda en sedimento de una
gruta en Taormina, Sicilia (Palazzi y
Villari, 2001) y una valva derecha en el
Adriático meridional (Micali, Tisselli y
Giunchi, 2006) La cita en el fondo aquí
estudiado representa la primera para el
Mediterráneo español, en el que se han
encontrado solamente tres valvas.
46
PEÑAS ET AL.\ Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 84-86. Sportella recóndita (P. Fischer in de Folin, 1872). 84, 85: valvas, 5,3 y 5,6 mm; 86:
microescultura.
Figures 84-86. Sportella recóndita (P. Fischer in de Folin, 1872). 84, 85: valves, 5.3 and 5.6 mm; 86:
microsculpture.
Kurtiella loidentata (Montagu, 1803) (Figs. 71-73)
Mya bidentata Montagu, 1803. Test. Brit., 1: 44, lám. 26, fig. 5. [Localidad tipo: Salcombe, Inglate-
rra].
Erycina nucleata Récluz, 1844. Rev. Zool., 7: 328.
Arcinella laevis Philippi, 1844. En. Molí, vol. 2: 54, lám. 16, fig. 10.
Mesodesma exiguum Lovén, 1846. Of. Kong. Vet. Ac. Fór., 196.
Material examinado: 40 e y más de 200 v.
Gofas y Salas (2008) consideran
que en el género Mysella Angas, 1877,
cuya especie tipo es Mysella anómala
Angas, 1877, no deben ser incluidas las
especies del grupo de Mya bidentata, que
viven en el Atlántico europeo y Medite-
rráneo, y crean el nuevo género Kurtie-
lla, perteneciente a la familia Montacuti-
dae. Este género se caracteriza por retro-
ceder la plataforma cardinal bajo el liga-
mento.
Ésta es la especie más abundante
entre las Galeommatacea encontrada en
el fondo aquí estudiado. También la
hemos encontrado común en todo tipo
de fondos detríticos desde 3-4 m hasta
más de 200 m de profundidad. Vive aso-
ciada a varias especies de Ophiuroidea y
según Kallonas et al. (1999) vive en
huecos de ostras, del sipuncúlido Golfin-
gia y en asociación con Acrocnida bra-
chiata. Valvas frágiles, blancas, brillan-
tes, periostraco color crema, apenas bri-
llante; sin diente cardinal, los dientes de
la valva derecha bien marcados y menos
formados los de la valva izquierda.
47
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Kurtiella tumidula (Jeffreys, 1866) (Figs. 78-80)
Montacuta tumidula Jeffreys, 1866. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 3 (18): 396. [Localidad tipo: Noroeste de
la costa de Rosshire, Escocia].
Material examinado: 4 v.
Sin diente cardinal, dientes laterales
igualmente desarrollados. Zenetos y van
Aartsen (1995) citan esta especie por
primera vez en el Mediterráneo para
aguas del Mar Egeo. Van Aartsen (1996)
la cita en Palermo, Sicilia, de la colección
Monterosato. Recientemente se ha citado
en el Tirreno por Margelli, Campani,
Coppini Y Cuneo (2006) y en Malta por
Cachia et al. (2004). Gofas y Salas
(2008) la citan para el Mar de Albor án. Se
cita aquí por segunda vez para el Medi-
terráneo español, habiéndose encontrado
dos valvas derechas y dos izquierdas.
Coracuta obliquata (Chaster, 1897) (Figs. 74-77)
Neolepton obliquatum Chaster, 1897. The Irish Nat., 6: 186, figs. 1,2.
Material examinado: 2 e + 7 v.
Concha (Figs. 74-76) menos frágil, muy
inequilateral, sin diente cardinal, umbo
evidente situado en la mitad posterior de
la valva y con una evidente escultura con-
céntrica (Fig. 77) en el exterior de las
valvas. Esta especie la hemos encontrado
desde relativamente poca profundidad, -
24 m en fondo de gorgonias en Mijas,
Málaga, hasta los 250/350 m en fondos de
coral blanco en el Garraf, donde es común.
Holmes, Gallichan y Wood (2006)
crean el nuevo género Coracuta, cuya
especie tipo es Neolepton obliquatum
Chaster, 1897.
Myoerycina phascolionis (Dautzenberg y Fischer, 1925) (Figs. 58-63)
? Galeomma compressa Philippi, 1844: 19, pl. 14, fig. 5.
Montacuta phascolionis Dautzenberg y Fischer, 1925. Trav. Stat. Biol. Roscoff, 3: 126.
? Kellia coarctata Wood, 1851. Mon. Grag. Molí, 2 (2): 123, lám. 12, figs. 10a, b.
Material examinado: 4 v.
Esta especie se caracteriza por tener
una pequeña plataforma cardinal y tener
en la valva derecha un diente cardinal
delante del ligamento y dos dientes late-
rales, uno anterior y otro posterior.
Troncoso y Urgorri (1992) y Tron-
coso, Moreira y Troncoso (2000) la
citan en las costas gallegas asociada al
sipuncúlido Phascolion strombi (Montagu,
1804). En el Mediterráneo español fue
citada por primera vez por Giribet y
Peñas (1997) en la costa de Garraf (Barce-
lona). Se cita aquí por segunda vez en un
fondo en el que también abunda Phasco-
lion strombi, sobre todo ocupando
conchas de Turritella communis.
Epilepton clarkiae (Clark, 1852) (Figs. 81-83)
Lepton clarkiae Clark, 1852. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 9 (2): 191.
Material examinado: 5 e + 14 v.
48
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 87-92. Thracia papyracea (Poli, 1791). 87, 88: conchas juveniles, 15 mm y 5 mm; 89, 90:
detalle de la charnela; 91, 92: microescultura, en dos zonas de la concha.
Figures 87-92. Thracia papyracea (Poli, 1791). 87, 88: juvenile shells, 15 mm and 5 mm; 89, 90:
detail ofthe hinge; 91, 92: microsculpture, on tivo areas ofthe shell.
Concha (Figs. 81-83) frágil, de dimi-
nutas dimensiones, perfil oval oblicuo,
blanca-amarillenta, muy brillante, con
líneas radiales visibles a gran aumento;
umbo relativamente grande, situado en la
mitad posterior; chamela estrecha formada
por un diente lateral anterior y otro pos-
terior; diente cardinal en ambas valvas. La
figura 82 muestra una valva excepcional-
mente grande (2.4 x 1.8 mm), sólida, con
los dientes laterales muy marcados.
Esta especie, al igual que Mioerycina
phascolionis, vive asociada al sipuncúlido
Phascolion strombi. La hemos encontrado
en este fondo y también en fondos del
Garraf, donde abunda Turritella commu-
nis, ya que ese sipuncúlido ocupa
conchas vacías de ella y de otros gaste-
rópodos.
Jespersen, Lützen y Oliver (2007)
revisan la posición morfológica, bioló-
gica y sistemática de esta especie.
49
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Sportella recóndita (P. Fischer in de Folin, 1872) (Figs. 84-86)
Scintella recóndita P. Fischer, 1872. Les fonds de la mer (1876) : 49, lám. 3, fig. 3.
Material examinado: 3 v.
Concha relativamente grande (hasta
10 mm) y menos frágil. Tiene un claro
diente anterior en la valva derecha y un
hueco tras él en el que entran los dos
dientes de la valva izquierda, de los
cuales el anterior es oblicuo y el poste-
rior vertical. Carrozza (1981) cita esta
especie para el Mediterráneo Oriental
(bahía de Haifa), a una profundidad de
68 m. Margelli, Coppini y Bogi (1995)
la citan para la Isla Chaparía, Italia,
entre 150 y 180 m de profundidad. Aquí
se cita por primera vez para el Medite-
rráneo español.
En Peñas, Rolán y Ballesteros
(2008) se cita e ilustra el hallazgo en
aguas del Garraf de un ejemplar vivo de
una rara especie, identificada como
Sportella sp., cuya charnela es muy
cercana a S. recóndita, pero no la forma.
Thracia papyracea (Poli, 1791) (Figs. 87-92)
Tellina papyracea Poli, 1791. Test. Utr. Sic., 1: 43, lám. 15, figs., 14, 18 non Tellina papyracea Gmelin,
1791.
Mya declivis Pennant, 1812. Brit. Zool.
Amphidesma phaseolina Lamarck, 1818. Anim. sans
Thracia mitella De Gregorio, 1884.
Material examinado: 3 e, 6 v.
Concha frágil y delgada, blanca, no
brillante, periostraco delgado castaño
claro, normalmente solo en los bordes de
las valvas; inequivalva, algo más conve-
xas la valva derecha; margen anterior
redondeado, margen posterior truncado;
escultura de líneas concéntricas irregula-
res, a gran aumento superficie granulosa,
áspera al tacto. Se ilustran dos conchas
Vert. Yol. 5.
juveniles (Figs. 87, 88), detalle de la char-
nela (Figs. 89, 90) y microescultura de dos
zonas de la concha (Figs. 91, 92).
En Peñas, Rolán, Luque, Tem-
plado, Moreno, Rubio, Salas, Sierra y
Gofas (2006, figs. 403-406) se ilustran
conchas juveniles y microescultura de
de Thracia villosiuscula (MacGillivray,
1827) procedente de Vilassar de Mar.
Lyonsia norwegica (Gmelin, 1791) (Figs. 93-95)
Mya norwegica Gmelin, 1791. Syst. Nat. ed. 13: 3222, n° 24.
Mya striata Montagu, 1811.
Amphidesma corbuloides Lamarck, 1818.
Anatina truncata Lamarck, 1818
Tellina coruscans Scacchi, 1833
Anatina elonagta Hanley, 1842.
Myatella montagui Brown, 1844
Material examinado: 35 e, 52 v.
Concha (Fig. 93) oval cuadrangular, sin diente. Región anterior del margen
más bien frágil, blanca, con periostraco dorsal recta y ligeramente inclinada;
delgado color castaño claro. Charnela región posterior recta o algo cóncava.
50
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Figuras 93-95. Lyonsia norwegica (Gmelin, 1791). 93: ejemplar juvenil, 22 mm; 94, 95: detalle de
la escultura.
Figures 93-95. Lyonsia norwegica ( Gmelin , 1791). 93: juvenile specimen, 22 mm; 94, 95: detail of
the sculpture.
más grande; margen anterior redonde-
ado, algo abierto, margen posterior
truncado, más abierto. Superficie exte-
rior (Figs. 94, 95) de aspecto rugoso,
formada por numerosas estrías radiales
apretadas y muy delgadas y por líneas
concétricas y por un menor número de
Características del fondo estudiado
Peres y Picard (1964) y también
Augier (1982) describieron varias bioce-
nosis de sustratos blandos en el piso cir-
calitoral, relativamente bien diferencia-
das, con unos grupos de especies carac-
terísticas o exclusivas de cada uno de
ellos. El lugar aquí estudiado se encuen-
tra en una zona abierta, sujeta a corrien-
tes marinas relativamente fuertes y
alejada de la desembocadura de ríos que
aporten de forma regular sedimentos
terrígenos, aunque la orografía monta-
ñosa de la comarca, con numerosas
costillas, equidistantes, sobre las estrías,
poco evidentes en ejemplares juveniles.
Ejemplares juveniles a menudo son ini-
dintificables porque las valvas están
cubiertas por una especie de masa
formada por granos de arena y otros
restos de los sedimentos en los que vive.
rieras y alta pluviosidad, hace que las
aportaciones de fangos sean periódicas.
Esta biocenosis podría definirse básica-
mente como un "fondo detrítico
costero" (DC), si bien este tipo de
fondos son muy variables, dependiendo
de la costa vecina y también de las for-
maciones infralitorales próximas. Este
fondo también podría estar relacionado
con una zona de transición hacia
"fangos de fuera", dada la abundancia
de especies como Similipecten similis
(Gofas, com. pers.).
51
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Por otra parte, si tenemos en cuenta
que la especie dominante en esta bioce-
nosis es el ascidiáceo Ascidia conchilega
(O. F. Müller, 1776), representando al
menos el 50% de la biomasa animal
obtenida, puede afirmarse que se trata
de una "facies" de ascidiáceos. Según
Pérés y Picard (1964) las formaciones
de Ascidias están relacionadas más o
menos directamente con poblamientos
vegetales densos de una parte y de
corrientes vivas de otra parte, como
ocurre en este caso.
Especies dominantes en estos fondos
Se consideran especies dominantes
del fondo estudiado aquellas de las que
se han encontrado numerosos ejempla-
res vivos en todos los muéstreos realiza-
dos. Son las siguientes:
Jujubinus montagui
Bittium latreillii
Turritella communis
Pusillina inconspicua
Caecum trachea
Apporrhais pespelicani
Calyptraea chinensis
Trophon muricatus
Nassarius pygmaeus
Bela brachystoma
Bela nébula
Mangelia costulata
Mangelia unifasciata
Megastomia conoidea
Odostomia acuta
Turbonilla rufa
Cylichnina crebrisculpta
Ringicula conformis
Nucula nitidosa
Nuculana commutata
Musculus subpictus
Modiolula phaseolina
Similipecten similis
Anomia ephippium
Myrtea spinifera
Thyasira biplicata
Kurtiella bidentata
Parvicardium minimum
Spisula subtruncata
Phaxas pellucidus
Abra alba
Abra prismática
Timoclea ovata
Gouldia mínima
Dosinia lupinus
Corbula gibba
Pandora pinna
Dentalium inaequicostatum
Dischides politus
Sin embargo, aunque no dominan-
tes, pueden considerarse típicas de estos
fondos todas aquellas encontradas
vivas, que se indican como comunes
(+++) en el listado.
Debe resaltarse que, entre los gaste-
rópodos, la familia Conidae, especial-
mente los géneros Bela y Mangelia, es la
más representativa de este fondo por el
número de especies encontradas y la
cantidad de ejemplares de cada una de
ellas. Por el contrario, son numerosas las
especies de Rissoidae encontradas, pero
de la mayoría sólo conchas vacías; úni-
camente en el caso de tres de ellas, Pusi-
llina inconspicua, Alvania punctura y
Obtusella macilenta se han encontrado
ejemplares vivos. En aguas catalanas
estas dos especies viven desde la zona
infralitoral hasta los 350 metros de pro-
fundidad en todo tipo de fondos
(Giribet y Peñas, 1997). Pseudotorinia
architae se encontró con cierta frecuencia
en todos los muéstreos, pero sólo
conchas, aunque en uno de ellos se
encontraron 40 ejemplares vivos. La
familia Pyramidellidae está bien repre-
sentada en este fondo, lógicamente tra-
tándose de animales ectoparásitos, y
destaca Turbonilla rufa por el número de
ejemplares vivos encontrados, seguida
de Megastomia conoidea.
Entre los bivalvos, la mayoría de las
especies arriba citadas como dominan-
tes se reparten la abundancia relativa.
De algunos microbivalvos, especial-
mente de la superfamilia Galeomatoi-
dea, se han encontrado escasas valvas,
dada su fragilidad; a pesar de lo cual
creemos que la mayoría de especies son
típicas de estos fondos.
Se comparan nuestros resultados,
con los obtenidos en un fondo de carac-
terísticas similares en Livorno. Cuneo,
Margeli, Campani y Coppini (2006)
estudiaron los gasterópodos y escafópo-
dos y listan 71 especies encontradas
vivas (66 gasterópodos y 5 escafópo-
dos). Coinciden con nuestro listado sola-
52
PEÑAS ETáL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
mente 40 especies (38 gasterópodos y 2
escafópodos), constatándose que en ese
fondo son muy pocas las especies abun-
dantes: Turritella communis, Nassarius
pygmaeus, Megastomia conoidea, Ringicula
conformis y Dentalium inaequicostatum,
que también en nuestro listado se citan
como abundantes, y también citan
Bittium reticulatum, especie que no
hemos encontrado viva. Margelli et
al. (2006) citan 48 especies de bivalvos
para la misma biocenosis de Livorno, de
ellas 35 se citan también en nuestro
listado. Destacan como abundantes las
siguientes especies: Myrtea spinifera, Thr-
y asir a alleni, My sella bidentata, Timoclea
ovata y Corbula gibba.
Solustri Y Micali (2002) también
estudian la malacofauna de un fondo
similar a 51 metros de profundidad en el
Adriático Medio, censando 49 especies
vivas (24 gasterópodos y 25 bivalvos).
Los gasterópodos dominantes eran
Trophon muricatus y Bela brachystoma.
Turritella communis era abundante pero
no se encontraron ejemplares vivos. En
cuanto a los bivalvos, las especies domi-
nantes eran Nucula nucleus, Myrtea spini-
fera, Thyasira biplicata, Parvicardium
mínimum y Phaxas pellucidus, todas coin-
cidentes con nuestro material, excepto
Nucula nucleus, que en nuestro fondo es
sustituida por Nucula nitidosa.
También hemos observado que
varias especies de moluscos que aquí
son dominantes no lo son en otros
fondos DC vecinos, como en la comarca
del Garraf.
Nuevas citas para el Mediterráneo
español
Seis son las especies que se citan por
primera vez para el Mediterráneo
español: Lepidochiton cimicoides, Johania
retifera, Laona flexuos a, Montacuta goudi,
Montacuta tenella y Sportella recóndita.
Relación con la cercana pradera de
Posidonia oceánica
En total se han encontrado 117 espe-
cies no vivas en la biocenosis aquí estu-
diada (1 poliplacóforo, 95 gasterópodos,
20 bivalvos y 1 escafópodo). De ellas, 21
especies de gasterópodos probable-
mente procedan precipitadas de la
cercana pradera de Posidonia oceánica, ya
que en ella se han encontrado vivas (ver
Peñas y Almera, 2001).
Por otra parte, en el fondo aquí estu-
diado se han encontrado 39 especies que
también se encontraron vivas en dicha
pradera (20 gasterópodos y 19 bivalvos),
de las cuales son comunes o abundantes
en ambos hábitats: Bittium latreillii, Vitre-
olina curva, Vitreolina perminima, Vitreo-
lina philippi, Obtusella intersecta, Alvania
punctura, Caecum trachea, Calyptraea chi-
nensis, Hexaplex trunculus, Chrysallida
emaciata, Odostomia unidentata, Musculus
subpictus, Musculus costulatus, Anomia
ephippium, Lucinella divaricata, Goodallia
triangularis, Timoclea ovata y Gouldia
mínima.
CONCLUSIONES
El análisis de los resultados obteni-
dos nos permite apreciar, en primer
lugar, la riqueza malacologica de estos
fondos, ya que el número de especies
vivas encontradas es relativamente
elevado para un área estudiada muy
pequeña, teniendo en cuenta que todos
los dragados se realizaron en las coorde-
nadas citadas, con una desviación infe-
rior a un kilómetro. En segundo lugar,
se puede definir con bastante aproxima-
ción qué especies componen una comu-
nidad de moluscos en una biocenosis de
fondo fangoso detrítico costero.
En total se han encontrado 332 espe-
cies (5 poliplacóforos, 219 gasterópodos,
105 bivalvos y 3 escafópodos), de ellas
213 vivas (4 poliplacóforos, 122 gasteró-
podos, 85 bivalvos y 2 escafópodos).
Dos especies se citan solamente a nivel
genérico y seis se citan por primera vez
para el Mediterráneo español.
Sin embargo, a pesar de la riqueza
malacologica de la zona estudiada, los
autores no son optimistas, ya que se ha
apreciado un retroceso en biodiversidad
y madurez en el curso de los años, pues
estos fondos ya fueron estudiados por el
tercero de los autores, con varios draga-
dos en la misma zona y en el mismo
período estacional entre 1982 y 1990, y
53
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
se ha podido constatar el progresivo
deterioro. Algunas especies, entonces
encontradas comúnmente vivas, o
incluso abundantes, prácticamente han
desaparecido de estos fondos, como
Mitrolumna olivoidea, Muricopsis aradasii,
Heliacus subvariegatus o Philine aperta.
Otras especies, aunque consideradas
adultas, pues mantienen el número de
vueltas, han ido reduciendo el tamaño
de su concha, como Eulima glabra,
Comarmondia gracilis, Mangelia unifas-
ciata, Mangelia costata y, sobre todo, M.
costulata. Y en otros casos, de algunas
especies actualmente casi solo se
encuentran juveniles como Aporrhais
pespelicani, Nuculana pella, Lucinoma bore-
ales, Gari fervensis y Lyonsia norwegica.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Nuestro agradecimiento al Ayunta-
miento de Vilassar de Mar, propietario
de la embarcación con la que se realiza-
ron los dragados; a Bruno dell' Angelo,
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Alonso A. y López-Jamar E. 1988. Infauna
bentónica de las costas de Almería. Resulta-
dos de la Campaña “RADIO 1805". Informes
Técnicos Instituto Español de Oceanografía, 65:
1-32.
Augier H. 1982. Inventory and classification of
marine benthic biocenoses of the Mediter-
ranean. Council of Europe, Strasbourg,
1982, 59 pp.
Biagi V. y Corselli C. 1984. Contributo alia co-
noscenza della malacofauna di un fondo
SFBC (Peres y Picard, 1964). Bollettino Mala-
cologico, 20 (5-8): 117-130.
Bogi C. y van Aartsen J.J. 2006. Posizione sis-
temática e distribuzione in Mar Mediterrá-
neo di 'Montacuta' semirubra Gaglini, 1992 e
'Montacuta' cuneata Gaglini, 1992 (Bivalvia:
Galeommatoidea). Bollettino Malacologico, 42
(9-12): 112-114.
Bogi C., Coppini M. y Margelli A. 1992. Ri-
trovamento di Litigiella glabra (P. Fischer,
1873) nelle acque di Livorno. La Conchiglia,
23 (264): 43-44.
Borja A. y Muxika I. 2001. Actualización del
catálogo de los moluscos marinos de la costa
vasca, en campañas realizadas por AZTI.
Iberus, 19 (2): 67-85.
de Prato, Italia, por su ayuda en la
determinación de algunos poliplacófo-
ros; a Virginie Herós, del MNHN, París,
quien nos permitió el estudio del mate-
rial tipo de varias especies del género
Bela; a Manuel Ballesteros, del Departa-
mento de Biología Animal, de la Facul-
tad de Biología de la Universidad de
Barcelona, quien nos facilitó bibliografía
importante para este trabajo; a Carmen
Salas, del Dpto. de Biología Animal de
la Universidad de Málaga, por sus
comentarios sobre algunos bivalvos; a
Jesús Méndez, del CACTI (Centro de
Apoyo Científico y Tecnológico a la
Investigación), de la Universidad de
Vigo, por la realización de las fotogra-
fías al MEB; y a Manuel Antonio Mala-
quias por su ayuda en la determinación
de algunas especies.
Este trabajo recibió apoyo del Pro-
yecto SYNTHESYS el cual está finan-
ciado por European Community, Rese-
arch Infrastructure Action bajo el pro-
grama FP6 "Structuring the European
Research Area".
Cachia C., Mifsud C. y Sammut P.M. 2004. The
Marine Mollusca of the Maltese Islands - Part
four Caudofoveata, Solenogastres, Bivalvia,
Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda, Backhuys Pub-
lishers, Leiden, 270 pp.
Carrozza F. 1983. Microdoride di Malacolo-
gia mediterránea (contributo quinto). Bollet-
tino Malacologico, 19 (1-4): 65-70.
Cuneo F., Margelli A., Campani E. y Coppini
M. 2006. Gastropoda e Scaphopoda dei fanghi
litorali di Livorno. Bollettino Malacologico, 42
(1-4): 5-12.
Dell' Angelo B. y Smriglio C. 2001. Living chi-
tonsfrom the Mediten anean Sea. Ed. Evolver,
Roma, 255 pp.
Fretter V. y Graham A. 1982. The proso-
branch mulluscs of Britain and Denmark.
Part 7. 'Heterogastropoda' (Cerithiopsacea,
Triforacea, Epitoniacea, Eulimacea). The Jour-
nal ofMolluscan Studies, suppl. 11: 363-434.
Fretter V., Graham A. y Andrews E.B. 1986.
The prosobranch molluscs of Britain and
Denmark. Part. 9. Pyramidellacea. The Jour-
nal ofMolluscan Studies, suppl. 16 :557-649.
Gaglini A. 1991. Seconde spigolature . . . mon-
terosatiane. Notiziario CISMA, 1990 (13) : 1-
22.
54
PEÑAS ET AL.: Fauna malacologica de fondo detrítico fangoso en El Maresme, Barcelona
Gaglini A., 1992. Terze spigolature ... monte-
rosatiane. Argonauta, 7 (1-6): 125-180.
Giribet G. y Peñas A. 1997. Fauna malacoló-
gica del litoral del Garraf (NE de la Península
Ibérica). Iberus, 15 (1): 41-93.
Gofas S. y Salas C. 2008. A review of european
" Mysella " species (Bivalvia, Montacutidae),
with description of Kurtiella new genus. Jour-
nal ofMolluscan Studies, 74: 119-135.
Ghisotti F. 1978. Rinvenimenti malacologici
nel Mediterráneo. Conchiglie, 14 (9-10): 151-
166.
Hoeksema D.F., van Aartsen J. J., Keuke-
laar-Van der Berge T., van Nieulande
F.A.D. y Simons G.F. 1995. On the identity
and distribution of Litigiella glabra (P. Fis-
cher, 1873) (Bivalvia Heterodonta: Lasaei-
dae). La Conchiglia, 26 (275): 17-22.
Holmes A.M., Gallichan J. y Wood H. 2006.
Coracuta obliquata n. gen. (Chaster, 1897) (Bi-
valvia: Montacutidae). First british record
for 100 years. Journal of Conchology, 39 (2):
151-158.
Jespersen A., Lützen J. y Oliver G. 2007. Mor-
phology, Biology and systematic position of
Epilepton clarkiae (Clark, 1852) (Galeomma-
toidea: Montacutidae) a bivalve commensal
sith sipunculans. Journal of Conchology, 39 (4):
391-401.
Rallonas M., Zenetos A. y Gofas S. 1999. No-
tes on the ecology and distribution of mi-
crobivalvia in Greek waters. La Conchiglia, 31
(291): 11-20
Lugli A. y Palazzi S. 1991. Cerithiopsis acumi-
nata Hallgass, 1985, sinónimo juniore di C. bar-
leei Jeffreys, 1867. Bollettino Malacologico, 2J
(5-9): 139-140.
Malaquias M.A.E. 2004. The opisthobranch
molluscs described by the reverend Robert
Boog Watson from the Madeira Archipelago
(Northeast Atlantic, Portugal). Journal of Con-
chology, 38 (3): 231-240.
Maluquer J. 1915. Anfineures de Catalunya.
Treballs de la Institució Catalana d'Historia Nat-
ural, 1: 187-280 + láms. 14-16.
Margelli A., Campani E., Coppini M. y Cu-
neo F. 2006. Bivalvia dei fanghi litorali di Li-
vomo. Bollettino Malacologico, 42 (9-12): 93-100.
Margelli A., Coppini M. y Bogi C. 1995. Re-
marks on some rare and poorly known
Mediterranean Molluscs. La Conchiglia, 27
(275): 42-44.
Micali P., Tisselli M. y Giunchi L. 2006. Seg-
nalazione di Tellimya tenella (Lovén, 1846)
per le isole Tremtini (Adriático meridionale).
Notiziario CISMA, 24 (1-4): 19-20.
Monterosato 1872. Notizie intorno alie Con-
chiglie Mediterranee. Palermo, 61 pp.
Nofroni I. y Tringali L.P. 1995. Random notes
on Eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean and
Lessepsian Pyramidellidae (Gastropoda: Het-
erobranchia: Pyramidelloidea). Notiziario
CISMA, 17: 21-49.
Oliver Baldoví J.D. 2007. Catálogo de los Gas-
terópodos testáceos marinos de la parte sur
del Golfo de Valencia (España). Iberus, 25 (2):
29-61.
Palazzi S. y Villar A. 2001. Molluschi e Bra-
chiopodi delle grotte sottomarine del Taor-
minese. La Conchiglia, Suppl. 297: 1-56.
Peñas A. y Almera J. 2001. Malacofauna aso-
ciada a una pradera de Posidonia oceánica (L.)
en Mataró (NE de la Península Ibérica). Spira,
1(1): 25-31.
Peñas A. y Giribet A. 2003. Adiciones a la
fauna malacologica del litoral del Garraf (NE
de la Península Ibérica). Iberus, 21 (1): 172-189.
Peñas A. y Rolán E. 1997. La familia Pyrami-
dellidae Gray, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda,
Heterostropha) en África Occidental. 2. Los
géneros Turbonilla y Eulimella. Iberus, Suple-
mento 3: 1-105.
Peñas A., Rolán E. y Ballesteros M. 2008. Se-
gunda adición a la fauna malacologica del li-
toral del Garraf (NE de la Península Ibérica).
Iberus, 26 (2): 15-42.
Peñas A., Rolán E., Luque A.A., Templado
J., Moreno D., Rubio F., Salas C., Sierra A.
Y Gofas S. 2006. Moluscos marinos de la isla
de Alborán. Iberus, 24 (1): 23-151.
Pérés J.M. 1982. Major Benthic Assemblages. En
Marine Ecology. Ed. O. Kinne, vol, 5, part 1:
373-521.
Pérés J.M. y Picard J. 1964. Nouveau Manuel
de Bionomie Benthique de la Mer Mediter-
ranée. Recueil des Travaux de la Station Marine
d'Endoume, Bulletin, 31 (47): 1-137.
Philippi R.A. 1836. Enumeratio molluscorum Si-
ciliae cum vivantium tum in tellure tertiariafos-
silium quae in itinere suo observabit. Schropp,
Berolini [Berlin], 267 pp + 12 láms.
Plañí P. y Turolla G. 1980. Johania retifera (For-
bes, 1844), opistobranco "ritrovato" dopo
cent'anni (Opisthobranchia: Cephalaspidea).
Bolletino Malacologico, 16 (1-2): 1-3.
Picard J. 1965. Recherches qualitatives sur les
biocoenoses marines des substrats meubles
dragables de la région marseillaise. Recueil des
Travaux de la Station Marine d'Endoume, Bul-
letin 36 (52) : 1-160.
Rueda J., Salas C. y Gofas S. 2000. A mollus-
can community from Coastal bioclastic bot-
toms in the Strait of Gibraltar area. Iberus, 18
(1): 95-123.
Schiotte T. 1998. A taxonomie revisión of the
genus Diaphana Brown, 1827, including a dis-
cussion of the phylogeny and zoogeography
of the genus (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia).
Steenstrupia, 24 (1): 77-140.
55
Iberus , 27 (1), 2009
Solustri C. Y Micali P. 2002. Nuovi ritrova-
menti malacologici e segnalazione di Thya-
sira granulosa (Monterosato, 1874) al largo
delle coste romagnole (Medio Adriático).
Cuaderno di Studi e Notizie di Storia N atúrale
della Romagna, 17: 21-30.
Solustri C. y Micali P. 2004. Pyramidellidae
(Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) di un'area cos-
tiera del medio Adriático ed hipótesis di as-
sociazione con i possibili ospiti. Bollettino
Malacologico, 40 (5-8): 60-69.
Tebble N. 1966. British Bivalve seashells. Trustees
of The British Museum (Natural History),
212 pp, 12 láms.
Troncoso J.S. y Urgorri V. 1992. Asociación
de Tellimya phascolionis (Dautzenberg y Fis-
cher) (Bivalvia, Montacutidae) con el sipun-
cúlido Phascolion strombi (Montagu, 1804) en
la Ría de Ares y Betanzos (Galicia, NO de Es-
paña). Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de
Historia Natural ( Sección Biológica), 88 (1-4):
189-194.
Troncoso N., Moreira J. y Troncoso J.S.
2000. Tellimya phascolionis (Dautzenberg y
Fischer, 1925) (Bivalvia, Montacutidae) and
other fauna associated with the sipunculid
Phascolion strombi (Montagu, 1804) in the Ria
de Aldán (Galicia, NW Península Ibérica).
Argonauta, 14 (1): 59-66.
van Aartsen J.J. 1996. Galeommatacea and
Cyamiacea. Part II. La Conchiglia, 28 (281):
27-53.
Zenetos A. y van Aartsen J.J. 1995. The deep
sea molluscan fauna of the S. E. Aegean Sea
and its relation to the neighbouring faunas.
Bollettino Malacologico, 30 (9-12): 253-268.
56
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas, 27 (1): 57-66, 2009
Dos nuevas especies del género Alvania (Caenogastropoda:
Rissoidae) de las islas Baleares
Two new species of the genus Alvania (Caenogastropoda: Rissoidae)
from the Baleario Islands (Western Mediterranean)
J. Daniel OLIVER* y José TEMPLADO**
Recibido el 6-X-2008. Aceptado el 23-1-2009
RESUMEN
Se describen dos nuevas especies del género Alvania del mar balear en base a caracte-
res exclusivamente conquiológicos. Una de ellas, A. baleárica spec. nov., es similar a A.
subcrenulata y A. nestaresi, de las que se diferencia por el perfil más turriculado de su
concha y por algunos caracteres de la escultura de la protoconcha y teloconcha. La
segunda de las especies, A. josefoi spec. nov., se asemeja a A. scabra y a A. sculptilis,
de las que se diferencia por su menor tamaño, coloración y en algunos caracteres de la
escultura de la protoconcha y teloconcha. Ambas especies muestran poca variabilidad en
sus características conquiológicos.
ABSTRACT
Two new species of the genus Alvania from the Balearic Sea are described based on shell
characters. The shell of one of them, A. baleárica spec. nov., resembles that of A. sub-
crenulata and A. nestaresi, but ¡t differs in the more turriculate outline and in some charac-
ters of the sculpture of the protoconch and teleoconch. The second one, A. josefoi spec.
nov., is compared to the closely related Alvania scabra and A. sculptilis. It differs in being
smaller, in the colour pattern of the shell and in some characters of the sculpture of the pro-
toconch and teleoconch. Both species are very uniform in conchological characteristics.
INTRODUCCIÓN
El género Alvania es dentro de los
gasterópodos marinos el que presenta
un mayor número de especies en el
Atlántico nororiental y Mediterráneo.
En la base de datos CLEMAM (septiem-
bre de 2008) se incluyen 129 especies de
este género para el área geográfica antes
señalada. De éstas, algo más de la mitad
están presentes en el Mediterráneo y
cerca de 40 de ellas (el número puede
variar en función de los criterios taxonó-
micos seguidos) han sido citadas en el
Mediterráneo español. Esta gran diver-
sidad de especies es consecuencia del
elevado número de endemismos que
presenta el género, con áreas de distri-
bución muy reducidas. Ello es especial-
mente patente en los distintos conjuntos
insulares. Dentro del Mediterráneo se
conocen especies endémicas de este
género en las islas del Tirreno, Jónico,
Adriático, Egeo o Chipre (Bogi, Coppini
y Margelli, 1983; Oliverio, 1986, 1988;
Giusti y Nofroni, 1989; van der
* Alcorisa 83 - 12 C, 28043 Madrid, Spain
** Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
57
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Linden y Wagner, 1989; Cecalupo y
Quadri, 1995; Margelli, 2001; Buzzu-
rro, 2003; Micali, Tisselli y Giunchi,
2005; Buzzurro y Landini, 2007; Buz-
zurro y Prkic, 2007). El hecho es que se
vienen describiendo nuevas especies de
forma paulatina, que han salido a la luz,
bien por el estudio faunístico de áreas
poco estudiadas, o por la revisión de
algunos grupos de Alvania conflictivos.
Amati, Nofroni y Oliverio (1990) rela-
cionan las nuevas especies del género
descritas entre 1980 y 1990, y desde
entonces se ha incrementado su número
en siete más: A. nestaresi Oliverio y
Amati, 1990, A. clarae Nofroni y Pizzini,
1991, A. elisae Margelli, 2001, A. oliverioi
Buzzurro, 2003, A. alboranensis Peñas y
Rolán in Peñas et al., 2006, A. claudioi
Buzzurro y Landini, 2007 y A. dalmática
Buzzurro y Prkic, 2007. Dos de ellas (A.
nestaresi y A. alboranensis ) pertenecen a
la fauna mediterránea española.
Por otra parte, en los últimos años el
número de especies descritas de Alvania
se ha incrementado también considera-
blemente por el descubrimiento de
nuevas especies procedentes de las islas
macaronésicas, la costa africana o de los
promontorios submarinos del atlántico
nororiental (Amati, 1987; Gofas, 1989,
1990, 1999, 2007; Moolenbeek y Hoen-
selaar, 1989, 1998; Bouchet y Warén,
1993; van der Linden, 1993; Hoense-
laar Y Goud, 1998; Segers, 1999).
Obviamente, las islas Baleares no
podían ser una excepción a los endemis-
mos insulares dentro del género y así lo
hemos constatado con el hallazgo de dos
nuevas especies del mismo, comunes en
el mar balear.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
Los ejemplares estudiados en el pre-
sente trabajo proceden principalmente
del estudio de los sedimentos recogidos
durante la campaña oceanográfica
Fauna III (dentro del proyecto Fauna
Ibérica) mediante buceo y depositados
en el Museo Nacional de Ciencias Natu-
rales de Madrid (MNCN). Además se
han estudiado también sedimentos reco-
gidos por los autores en algunos puntos
de Ibiza y Menorca.
Los ejemplares han sido examina-
dos, medidos y fotografiados mediante
una lupa binocular y por medio de un
microscopio electrónico de barrido.
DESCRIPCIÓN
Alvania baleárica spec. nov. (Figs. 1-7, 28)
Material tipo: Holotipo y paratipos (14 ejemplares, todos de la localidad tipo) depositados en el
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid (número de catálogo: 1505/47057).
Localidad tipo: Islote de S'Espartar, en la costa occidental de Ibiza, islas Baleares, a 25 m de pro-
fundidad (coordenadas geográficas: 38° 58' 10" N - 01° 09' 24" E).
(Página derecha) Figuras 1-7. A. baleárica spec. nov. 1: paratipo, 2,1 mm, Ibiza; 2: concha, 2,3
mm, islas Columbretes; 3: vista lateral de la protoconcha, Ibiza; 4: vista apical de la protoconcha,
Ibiza; 5: detalle de la protoconcha, islas Columbretes; 6: detalle de la ornamentación de la proto-
concha, islas Columbretes; 7: detalle de la transición protoconcha/ teloconcha, Ibiza. Figuras 8, 9.
A. subcrenulata. 8: concha, 2,5 mm, Ibiza; 9: vista apical de la protoconcha, Ibiza. Figuras 10, 11.
A. nestaresi. 10: concha, 2,4 mm, La Herradura; 11: vista apical de la protoconcha, La Herradura.
(Right page) Figures 1-7. A. baleárica spec. nov.l: paratype, 2.1 mm, Ibiza; 2: shell, 2.3 mm, Colum-
bretes Islands; 3: lateral view ofthe protoconch, Ibiza; 4: apical view ofthe protoconch, Ibiza; 5: detail
ofthe protoconch, Columbretes Islands; 6: detail ofthe microsculpture ofthe protoconch, Columbretes
Islands; 7: detail ofthe transition between protoconch and teleoconch, Ibiza. Figures 8, 9. A. subcrenu-
lata. 8: shell, 2.5 mm, Ibiza; 9: apical view ofthe protoconch, Ibiza. Figuras 10, 11. A. nestaresi. 10:
shell, 2.4 mm, La Herradura; 11: apical view ofthe protoconch, La Herradura.
58
Oliver Y TEMPLADO: Dos nuevas especies del género Alvania de las islas Baleares
|i¿ S
m. t? % fe»
1 :ü |’
^ / j¿m¿ {ék :
r k*
59
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Otro material estudiado: Se han estudiado más de 1.300 ejemplares de las islas Columbretes y más
de 700 de distintos puntos de Ibiza, Mallorca y Menorca (islas Baleares).
Etimología: El nombre de la especie hace referencia a su abundancia en el mar balear, del que parece
ser endémica.
Descripción: Especie en apariencia
muy similar a A. subcrenulata y A. nesta-
resi. Concha del holotipo (Fig. 28) con 3,5
vueltas de espira, 2,25 mm de altura y
1,25 mm de anchura. Forma algo turricu-
lada, ornamentada por costillas y cordo-
nes casi de la misma anchura y que al
cruzarse forman tubérculos algo puntia-
gudos. Penúltima vuelta de espira con
tres cordones suprabucales, uno a la
altura de la inserción labial y tres básales,
que delimitan surcos bastante profundos.
A gran aumento se observa una microes-
cultura de diminutos gránulos, similar a
la de Alvania cancellata (Da Costa, 1778).
Interior del labio externo dentado.
Color de la concha blanquecino, con
dos bandas longitudinales pardo-amari-
llentas sobre la última espira (Fig. 28).
La superior, más estrecha, es subsutural
y la inferior, más ancha, discurre por
debajo de la línea donde se produce la
inserción del labio externo. Por la parte
externa del labio, un poco antes del
engrosamiento labial, ambas franjas
tienden a juntarse. Columela e interior
del labio externo de color blanco.
Protoconcha paucispiral con un
núcleo claramente inclinado (Figs. 3-5).
Las dimensiones de la protoconcha del
holotipo fueron: n° de vueltas 1,35; diá-
metro del núcleo 95 jum; anchura de la
primera media vuelta de espira 205 |um;
anchura de la primera vuelta de espira
295 jum; diámetro máximo 345 p;
altura 350 jum. La ornamentación se
inicia con tres cordones aquillados (Fig.
4), que se ven incluso con una lupa de
pocos aumentos, y que a mitad de la
protoconcha se convierten en gránulos
gruesos toscamente alineados (Fig. 5).
Entre los cordones espirales pueden
apreciarse a veces esbozos de cordones
incompletos (Fig. 6). La transición con la
teloconcha (Figs. 3 y 7) es brusca. Ésta se
inicia ya con dos gruesas costillas.
A pesar del elevado número de
ejemplares estudiados, no se observa
apenas variabilidad en los caracteres de
la concha (tamaño, forma y color). En
los ejemplares de las islas Columbretes
la sutura es ligeramente más pronun-
ciada que en los de las Baleares.
Biología y distribución: La mayor
parte de los ejemplares se han hallado
en sedimentos entre 20-40 metros de
profundidad. Los sedimentos de donde
se han extraído proceden casi todos de
zonas con dominancia de comunidades
de algas infralitorales profundas (algas
hemiesciáfilas). Una descripción de esta
comunidad en el archipiélago de las
Columbretes puede verse en el libro de
Templado y Calvo (2002, págs. 97-100).
A. baleárica parece sustituir a A. nes-
taresi en el mar Balear. En algunas locali-
dades de Baleares, como en los islotes
occidentales de Ibiza o en el norte de
(Página derecha) Figuras 12-16: A. josefoi spec. nov., Tagomago (Ibiza). 12: holotipo, 1,8 mm; 13:
vista lateral de la protoconcha; 14: vista apical de la protoconcha; 15: detalle de la microescultura
de la protoconcha; 16: detalle de la microescultura de la teloconcha. Figuras 17-19. A. scabra. 17:
ejemplar con la misma coloración que A. josefoi, 1,4 mm, Ibiza; 18: ejemplar de La Herradura, 2,4
mm; 19: vista apical de la protoconcha. Figuras 20-22. A. sculptilis , Getares. 20: concha, 2,1 mm;
21: vista apical de la protoconcha; 22: detalle de la microescultura de la teloconcha.
(Right page) Figuras 12-16: A. josefoi spec. nov., Tagomago (Ibiza). 12: holotype, 1.8 mm; 13: lateral
view of the protoconch; 14: apical view of the protoconch ; 15: detail ofthe microesculpture ofthe proto-
conch; 16: detail ofthe microesculpture ofthe teleoconch. Figuras 17-19. A. scabra. 17: specimen with
the same colour pattern than that of A. josefoi, 1.4 mm, Ibiza; 18: specimen from La Herradura, 2.4
mm; 19: apical view of the protoconch. Figuras 20-22. A. sculptilis, Getares. 20: shell, 2. 1 mm, 21:
apical view of the protoconch; 22: detail of the microesculpture ofthe teleoconch.
60
OLIVER Y TEMPLADO: Dos nuevas especies del género Alvania de las islas Baleares
61
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Menorca, aparece en sedimentos junto
con A. subcrenulata, si bien esta última es
mucho más escasa.
Discusión : Oliverio y Amati (1990)
consideran que A. subcrenulata es un
taxón confuso, y que este nombre se ha
utilizado en el pasado seguramente para
un complejo de especies próximas.
Algunas de las especies pertenecientes a
este complejo serían Alvania amatii Oli-
verio, 1986, del Mediterráneo oriental,
A. aartseni Verduin, 1986, de las costas
del norte de África, y A. nestaresi Olive-
rio y Amati, 1990, del Mediterráneo
suroccidental. Asimismo, los ejemplares
identificados por Oliverio y Amati
(1989) como A. aartseni (de la colección
Locard del MNHN de París), proceden-
tes del sur de Francia, pudieran pertene-
cer a otra especie de este complejo.
Alvania baleárica sería una nueva especie
perteneciente a este complejo, cuya área
de distribución en el archipiélago balear
se solapa con la de A. subcrenulata.
De esta última especie se diferencia
por presentar A. baleárica un perfil más
turriculado y un cordón subsutural no
tan evidente (se reduce a un reborde)
como en A. subcrenulata (Figs. 8, 19). Asi-
mismo, los cordones espirales son algo
más gruesos y los tubérculos más sobre-
salientes. Por otro lado, la protoconcha
de A. baleárica está ornamentada por tres
cordones aquillados que a mitad de la
protoconcha se convierten en gránulos
gruesos toscamente alineados. En A.
subcrenulata la protoconcha presenta una
ligera cresta en la porción mediosupe-
rior de la espira y está ornamentada por
gruesos tubérculos, en lugar de cordo-
nes (Fig. 9).
De A. nestaresi (Figs. 10, 30) se dife-
rencia por presentar también un perfil
más turriculado, menor número de cor-
dones espirales (tres cordones suprabu-
cales en la última espira en A. baleárica,
frente a cuatro en A. nestaresi). La escul-
tura de la protoconcha de A. nestaresi
consta de cinco o seis cordoncillos espi-
rales que llegan hasta el final de la pro-
toconcha (Fig. 11), mientras que la de A.
baleárica sólo tiene tres cordones que no
llegan hasta el final. A. nestaresi es una
especie muy abundante en el sur y
sureste peninsular, que en las islas
Columbretes y Baleares parece ser susti-
tuida por A. baleárica, muy abundante
en este entorno geográfico y que parece
vivir en un hábitat similar.
Otra especie parecida a A. baleárica
en tamaño, color, escultura y microes-
cultura de la concha es A. amati, del
Mediterráneo oriental. La separación
geográfica de ambas especies y el hecho
de que las dos tengan una protoconcha
paucispiral (indicativo de una fase lar-
varia muy corta o ausente, lo que en
principio limitaría la capacidad de dis-
persión), y algunos detalles de la escul-
tura de sus protoconchas descartan la
posibilidad de que puedan ser conside-
radas como una única especie. La proto-
concha de A. baleárica es más alta que la
de A. amati, tiene tres cordones espirales
frente a los cuatro o cinco de A. amati y
el granulado final es menos denso y
grueso que en A. amati.
De Alvania aartseni, del norte de
África, se diferencia sobre todo porque
en esta última especie la escultura de la
protoconcha no presenta los tres cordo-
nes iniciales.
(Página derecha) Figuras 23, 24. A. josefoi nov. spec., islotes occidentales de Ibiza, paratipos de 1,5
y 1,7 mm, respectivamente. Figura 25. A. sculptilis , Algeciras, 2 mm. Figuras 26, 27. A. scabra, islas
Columbretes, ejemplares de 2,0 y 2,1 mm respectivamente. Figura 28. A. baleárica nov. spec.,
islotes occidentales de Ibiza, holotipo, 2,25 x 1,25 mm. Figura 29. A. subcrenulata , Algeciras, 2,8
mm. Figura 30. A. nestaresi , Cabo Palos, 2,6 mm.
(Right page) Figures 23, 24. A. josefoi nov. spec., western inlets of Ibiza, paratypes of 1.5 and 1.7 mm,
respectively. Figure 25. A. sculptilis, Algeciras, 2 mm. Figures 26, 27. A. scabra. Columbretes Islands,
specimens of2.0 and 2.1 mm respectively. Figure 28. A. baleárica nov. spec., western inlets of Ibiza,
holotype, 2,25 x 1,25 mm. Figure 29. A. subcrenulata, Algeciras, 2.8 mm. Figure 30. A. nestaresi,
Cabo Palos, 2. 6 mm.
62
Oliver Y TEMPLADO: Dos nuevas especies del género Alvania de las islas Baleares
63
Iberus , 27 (1), 2009
La especie A. sleursi Amati, 1987, endé-
mica de Azores, también presenta un
cierto parecido con A. baleárica. En A.
sleursi hay dos cordones suprabucales
mientras que en A. baleárica las conchas
adultas tienen tres (aunque las subadul-
tas tienen dos). La protoconcha de A.
sleursi, al igual que la de A. baleárica tiene
tres cordones espirales, pero en la primera
llegan hasta el final de la protoconcha,
mientras que en la segunda dichos cor-
dones se transforman en gránulos.
Alvania josefoi nov. sp. (Figs. 12-16. 23-24)
Material tipo: Holotipo y paratipos (9 ejemplares, todos de la localidad tipo) procedentes de la
muestra 236B18 de la campaña oceanográfica Fauna III y depositados en el Museo Nacional de
Ciencias Naturales (n° de catálogo: 1505/47058).
Localidad tipo: Al sur de la isla Tagomago (Ibiza, islas Baleares) (coordenadas geográficas: 39° 01'
80"N - 01° 39' 14"E).
Otro material estudiado: Se han estudiado más de 100 ejemplares procedentes de algunas islas e
islotes de Ibiza y del sur y suroeste de Menorca (islas Baleares).
Etimología: La especie se dedica a la memoria de José Bedoya Romero "Josefo", ya fallecido, autor
de algunas de las fotografías al microscopio electrónico de barrido del presente trabajo y gran amigo.
Descripción : Especie en apariencia
muy similar a A. scabra y a A. sculptilis.
Teloconcha del holotipo (Fig. 12) con tres
vueltas de espira, 1,8 mm de altura y 0,9
mm de anchura. Perfil de las vueltas de
espira convexo y ligeramente anguloso.
Cuatro cordones longitudinales supra-
bucales claros en la última vuelta, que ya
están presentes en la penúltima. Costillas
verticales de grosor similar al de los cor-
dones espirales, que al cruzarse forman
pequeños tubérculos. Esta ornamenta-
ción confiere a la concha un aspecto reh-
ollado. Abertura algo piriforme. Superfi-
cie de la concha con una microescultura
muy característica, consistente en nume-
rosos cordoncillos longitudinales muy
juntos que le dan un aspecto estriado
(Fig. 16). Interior del labio externo no
dentado. Color blanco, algo traslúcido,
con una evidente mancha marrón en la
parte final de la última vuelta, justo por
encima del labio externo.
Protoconcha del holotipo paucispiral
(Figs. 13-15) con 1,45 vueltas. Diámetro
del núcleo 90 pm; anchura de la primera
media vuelta 190 jum; anchura de la
primera vuelta 260 jum; diámetro máximo
335 jum; altura 265 jum. Ornamentada por
gránulos muy juntos, algunos de ellos
unidos longitudinalmente y dispuestos en
una decena de filas poco delimitadas, en
las que resulta casi imposible distinguir
los interespacios (Fig. 15).
Existe una gran uniformidad en
todos los ejemplares estudiados, tanto
en el tamaño, como en la forma y color.
Biología y distribución : Sus conchas
han sido encontradas preferentemente
en detritos localizados entre 15 y 40
metros de profundidad en la proximi-
dad de fondos rocosos con algas fotófi-
las y enclaves esciáfilos. Sólo se ha
encontrado en el entorno de la isla de
Ibiza y en algunos puntos de Menorca.
Discusión : Las especies ibéricas más
parecidas a A. josefoi son A. scabra (Figs.
17-18, 26-27) y A. sculptilis (Figs. 20 y
25). Asimismo, la protoconcha indica su
parentesco con estas dos especies. A.
scabra convive con A. josefoi, pero es más
común que ésta. Por otro lado, A. sculp-
tilis es una especie típica del sur de la
península ibérica y del norte de África
(Tringali, 2001) que no ha sido locali-
zada en las Baleares.
Los ejemplares de A. scabra que convi-
ven con A. josefoi son algo mayores,
tienen el perfil de espira más redondeado
y la ornamentación más pronunciada.
Además A. scabra tiene menos costillas y
éstas suelen ser más anchas que los cor-
dones, mientras que en A. josefoi son de
anchura similar. En la teloconcha de A.
scabra se observa también una una micro-
escultura formada por débiles cordonci-
llos situados entre los cordones espirales,
pero sin el aspecto estriado que se aprecia
64
OLIVER Y TEMPLADO: Dos nuevas especies del género Alvania de las islas Baleares
en A. josefoi. Por último, la protoconcha
de A. scabra (Fig. 19) presenta los gránu-
los más alineados que en A. josefoi.
A. sculptilis también es de mayor
tamaño que A. josefoi y además su concha
es amarillenta con manchas marrones y
con tendencia a ser traslúcida, mientras
que el patrón de coloración de A. josefoi es
constante en todas las conchas examina-
das. La microescultura de la protoconcha
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Agradecemos a Ma Angeles Ramos y
Oscar Soriano el ponernos a nuestra dis-
posición el material de moluscos reco-
gido en las campañas del proyecto
Fauna Ibérica. Los técnicos del laborato-
rio de microscopía electrónica del Mu-
seo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Jo-
sefa Bedoya (ya fallecido), Laura Tormo
y Marta Furió han dedicado mucho
tiempo para fotografiar una ingente can-
tidad de micromoluscos durante los úl-
timos años. Agradecemos también al
servicio de fotografía de esta institución
(Jesús Muñoz y Fernando Señor) las
imágenes a color que ilustran el trabajo.
Anselmo Peñas y Emilio Rolán una vez
más nos han cedido material de compa-
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Amati B. 1987. Manzonia (Alvinia) sleursi sp. n.
(Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Notiziario CI-
SMA, 10: 25-30.
Amati B., Nofroni I. y Oliverio M. 1990.
Nouve specie e riscoperte nell' " Alvania -
group" dal 1980 ad oggi per il Mediterrá-
neo. La Conchiglia, 22: 47-49.
Amati B. y Oliverio M. 1989. Prima segnala-
zioni di Alvania aartseni Verduin, 1986 per le
coste Francese, e considerazioni tassonomi-
che. En Nofroni, I. (Ed.): Atti Della Prima
Giornata di Studi Malacologici C.I.S.Ma, Roma:
265-267.
Bogi C., Coppini M. y Margelli A. 1983. Con-
tributo alia conoscenza della malacofauna
delTAlto Tirreno. II genero Alvania. La Con-
chiglia, 28 (206-207): 26-29.
Bouchet P. y Warén A. 1993. Revisión of the
Northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Meso-
gastropoda. Bollettino Malacologico, supple-
mento 3: 579-840.
y teloconcha de A. sculptilis son más simi-
lares a las de A. scabra que a las de A. josefoi.
En las islas Canarias existen otras dos
especies de Alvania pertenecientes a este
grupo: A. canariensis (D'Orbigny, 1939) y
A. grancanariensis Segers, 1999. Ambas se
diferencian sobre todo a primera vista por
el color del ápice, negruzco en la primera
y amarillo dorado en la segunda (ver
Segers, 1999).
ración de sus respectivas colecciones.
Agradecemos también a Silvia Revenga
y a Diego K. Kerstin el apoyo prestado
para el trabajo en las islas Columbre-
tes.Antoni Grau, Jefe del Servei de Re-
cursos Marins de la Conselleria d' Agri-
cultura i Pesca de les liles Balears (Di-
recció General de Pesca) nos concedió
con celeridad los permisos para los
muéstreos en Baleares y David López,
guarda de la Reserva Marina del Norte
de Menoría, y Antonio Fayos, del Club
Sea Gipsy de Cala Galdana, nos propor-
cionaron soporte logístico y ayuda en
las inmersiones realizadas en Menorca.
Por último, agradecemos a Serge Gofas
sus comentarios y sugerencias.
Buzzurro G. 2003. Una nuova specie di Alva-
nia di Cipro. La Conchiglia, 308: 43-46.
Buzzurro G. y Landini F. 2007. Descrizione
di una nuova specie di Rissoidae (Gastro-
poda: Prosobranchia) per le coste laziali
(Mar Tirreno). Bollettino Malacologico, 42 (1-
4): 24-26.
P’JZZURRO G. Y Prkic J. 2007. A new species of
1 Ivania (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Rissoi-
dae) from Croatian coast of Dalmatia. Tritón,
15:5-9.
Cecalupo A. y Quadri P. 1995. Contributo
alia conoscenza malacologica per il Nord
dell'isola di Cipro (Parte II). Bollettino Mala-
cologico, 30 (10-12): 269-276.
CLEMAM Taxonomic Database on European
Marine Molluscs (http: / / www.somali.asso.
fr/clemam/ index.clemam.html).
Giusti F. y Nofroni 1. 1989. Alvania dipacoi new
species from the Tuscan Archipelago. La
Conchiglia, 21 (242-245): 54-56.
65
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Gofas S. 1989. Two new species of Alvania (Ris-
soidae) from the Azores. Publicagoes Ocasionáis
da Sociedade Portuguesa de Malacologia, 14: 39-
42.
Gofas S. 1990. The littoral Rissoidae and An-
abathridae of Sao Miguel, Azores. Acoreana,
1990 suppl. : 97-134.
Gofas S. 1999. The West African Rissoidae
(Gastropoda: Rissooidea) and their similar-
ities to some European species. The Nautilus,
113 (3): 78-101.
Gofas S. 2007. Rissoidae (Mollusca: Gastro-
poda) from northeast Atlantic seamounts.
Journal of Natural History, 41 (13-16): 779-885.
Hoenselaar H. J. y Goud J. 1998. The Ris-
soidae of the CANCAP expeditions, I: the
genus Alvania Risso, 1826 (Gastropoda, Proso-
branchia). Basteria, 62: 69-115.
Margelli A. 2001. A new species from Capraia
Is. (Tuscan Archipelago): Alvania elisae sp.
nov. La Conchiglia, 300: 43-50.
Micali P., Tisselli M. y Giunchi L. 2005. Al-
vania villarii n. sp. from the south Tyrrhe-
nian Sea (Gastropoda: Rissoidae). Bollettino
Malacologico, 40 (5-8): 70-73.
Moolenbeek R. y Hoenselaar H.J. 1989. The
genus Alvania in the Canary Islands and
Madeira (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Part 1. Bul-
letin, Zoólogisch Museum, Universiteit van Am-
sterdam, 11 (27): 215-228.
Moolenbeek R.G. y Hoenselaar H.J. 1998.
The genus Alvania in the Canary Islands and
Madeira (Mollusca: Gastropoda): Part 2 [fi-
nal part]. Bulletin, Zoólogisch Museum, Uni-
versiteit van Amsterdam, 16 (8): 53-62.
Oliverio M. 1986. Alvania amatii n. sp. (Gas-
tropoda Prosobranchia) Notiziario CISMA,
7/8: 29-34.
Oliverio M. 1988. A new Prosobranch from
the Mediterranean Sea, Alvania dianensis n. sp.
Bulletin, Zoólogisch Museum, Universiteit van
Ámsterdam, 11 (13): 117-120
Oliverio M. y Amati B. 1990. Una nuova spe-
cie del gruppo di Alvania subcrenulata (Ga-
stropoda; Rissoidae) . Bollettino Malacologico,
26 (5-9): 83-90.
Segers W. 1999. Alvania grancanariensis new
species from the Canary Islands (Gastro-
poda: Prosobranchia). Gloria Maris, 37 (5-6):
82-87.
Templado J. y Calvo M. (eds.), 2002. Flora y
Fauna de la Reserva Marina de las islas Colum-
bretes. Secretaría General de Pesca Marítima
(MAPA), Madrid, 263 pp.
Tringali L.P. 2001. Marine malacological re-
cords (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia, Hetero-
branchia, Opisthobranchia and Pulmonata)
from Torres de Alcalá, Mediterranean Mo-
rocco, with the description of a new philinid
species. Bolletino Malacologico, 37 (9-12): 207-
222.
van der Linden J. 1993. Alvania obsoleta spec.
nov. from the Azores (Gastropoda, Proso-
branchia: Rissoidae). Basteria, 57: 79-82.
van der Linden J. y Wagner W.M. 1989. Al-
vania multiquadrata spec. nov. from the Canary
Islands. Basteria, 53: 35-37.
66
© Sociedad Española de Mataco logia
Iberas , 27 (1): 67-78, 2009
Proneomeniidae (Solenogastres, Cavibelonia) from the
Bentart-2006 Expedition, with description of a new species
Proneomeniidae (Solenogastres, Cavibelonia) de la Campaña
Bentart-2006, con la descripción de una nueva especie
Oscar GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ*, María ZAMARRO** and Victoriano URGORRI*
Recibido el 29-X-2008. Aceptado el 16-III-2009
ABSTRACT
During the Spanish oceanographic expedition for the study of Antarctic benthos, Bentart-
2006, carried out in the orea of the Bellingshausen Sea and Antarctic Península, seven
specimens of Proneomeniidae (Solenogastres, Cavibelonia) were obtained. Proneomenia
bulbosa sp. nov. is described here. A comparative table of the main specific characters of
the species belonging to the genus Proneomenia is also included. New data of Dorymenia
usarpi Salvini-Plawen, 1978 and Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri
and Salvini-Plawen, 2000 are presented here.
RESUMEN
Durante la campaña oceanográfica española para el estudio del bentos antártico, Bentart-
2006, se recogieron en el área del Mar de Bellingshausen y la Península Antártica siete
especímenes de Proneomeniidae (Solenogastres, Cavibelonia). Se describe Proneomenia
bulbosa sp. nov. Se incluye una tabla comparativa de los principales caracteres de las
especies pertenecientes al género Proneomenia. Se presentan nuevos datos de Dorymenia
usarpi Salvini-Plawen, 1978 y de Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri
and Salvini-Plawen, 2000.
INTRODUCTION
The family Proneomeniidae is highly
homogeneous, comprising species that
are generally over 1 cm in length, most
of them measuring between 2 and 5 cm
long. They are characterized by present-
ing a thick cuticle with severa! layers of
hollow acicular sclerites, a polystic-
hous/polyserial radula and ventrolat-
eral foregut glandular organs with a
paired duct of epithelially arranged
gland cells surrounded by musculature
(type C according to Salvini-Plawen,
1978a; Epimenia type according to
Handl and Todt, 2005). The family
ineludes two genera: Proneomenia and
Dorymenia, which differ in the
absence/presence of copulatory stylets.
The genus Proneomenia ineludes ten
species, four of which belong to the
Antarctic and Subantarctic biogeo-
graphic areas (Salvini-Plawen, 1978a):
Proneomenia epibionta Salvini-Plawen,
Departamento de Zooloxía e Antropoloxía Física. Facultade de Bioloxía. Universidade de Santiago de
Compostela. Campus Sur s/n. 15782 Santiago de Compostela. Spain. ogarcia.alvarez@edu.xunta.es
** Unidade de Biodiversidade e Recursos Mariños. Instituto de Acuicultura. Universidade de Santiago de
Compostela. Campus Sur s/n. 15782 Santiago de Compostela. Spain.
67
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
1978 and Proneomenia stillerythrocytica
Salvini-Plawen, 1978 were collected near
the Falkland Islands; Proneomenia praeda-
toria Salvini-Plawen, 1978 comes from
the Kerguelen Islands and Drake
Passage. Only Proneomenia gerlachei
Pelseneer, 1901 was collected in the
same biogeographic area as Proneomenia
bulbosa sp. nov., from the Bellingshausen
Sea.
The genus Dorymenia, one of the
largest of this class, ineludes twenty-
four species, seventeen of which come
from the Antarctic and Subantarctic bio-
geographic areas (Salvini-Plawen,
1978a; García-Álvarez et al., 1998;
2000, García-Álvarez and Urgorri,
2003). The two species of this genus
studied herein, Dorymenia usarpi Salvini-
Plawen, 1978 and Dorymenia menchue-
scribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri and
Salvini-Plawen, 2000, come from South
Shetland Islands, an area in which six
other species are known: Dorymenia acu-
tidentata Salvini-Plawen, 1978, Dory-
menia cristata Salvini-Plawen, 1978,
Dorymenia hesperidesi García-Álvarez,
Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen, 2000, Dory-
menia hoffmani Salvini-Plawen, 1978,
Dorymenia parvidentata García-Álvarez
and Urgorri, 2003 and Dorymenia tron-
cosoi García-Álvarez, Urgorri and
Salvini-Plawen, 1998.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The seven specimens studied were
collected in three stations sampled
during the expedition Bentart-2006,
which was carried out on board the BIO
Hespérides in January-February 2006 at
Bellingshausen Sea and the Ántarctic
Peninsula. Specimens were fixed and
preserved in 70% ethanol. For the study
of selerites, small pieces of cuticle of the
dorsal middle part of the body and of
the ventral groove were separated.
These pieces were treated with sodium
hypochlorite at 5% for 12 hours to
isolate the selerites. They were then
washed with water, dried in a drying
chamber at 40°C and mounted in
Cañada balsam. For their anatomical
study, specimens were decalcified in an
EDTA solution for 12 hours, they were
embedded in paraffin, cut in transverse
series of 10 jum in section, stained with
Mallory trichromic and the reconstruc-
tion of the internal anatomy of their
anterior and posterior body was per-
formed.
SYSTEMATICS
Family Proneomeniidae Simroth, 1893
Diagnosis: See Salvini-Plawen, 1978a; García-Álvarez and Salvini-Plawen, 2007
Genus Proneomenia Fiubrecht, 1880
Diagnosis: See Salvini-Plawen, 1978a; García-Álvarez and Salvini-Plawen, 2007
Type species: Proneomenia sluiteri Hubrecht, 1880
Proneomenia bulbosa sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 2)
Type material: Holotype 1 specimen 43 x 2.5 mm, cut in serial sections. Bellingshausen Sea (Antar-
tica). Bentart-2006, Station MB 34-2; coordinates: 70° 11.620' S, 84° 8.694' W; 603 m depth. The holo-
type, cut in serial sections, is deposited in the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales of Madrid,
number MNCN 15.02/25.
Etymology: From Latin bulbus, bulb, regarding the posterior body of the bulging body.
Diagnosis: Body without protuber- acuminate posterior body. 300 jum thick
anees and keels, with a bulging and cuticle. Hollow acicular selerites (130-
68
GarcÍA-Alvarez ET AL.: Proneomeniidae from the Bentart-2006 Expedition
Figure 1. Proneomenia bulbosa sp. nov. A: habitus; B: hollow sclerites; C: radular tooth; D: schema-
tic organization of the anterior body; E: schematic organization of the posterior body. Abbrevia-
tions, At: atrial sense organ; Cg: cerebral ganglion; De: dorsal caecum; Dg: dorsal gland; Dso: dor-
soterminal sense organ; Mg: midgut; Pe: pallial cavity; Ph: pharynx; Pr: pericardium; Ra: radula
apparatus; Sd: spawning duct; Sr: seminal receptacle; Vfg: ventral foregut glandular organ.
Figura 1. Proneomenia bulbosa sp. nov. A: habitus; B: escleritos huecos; C: diente radular; D: esquema
de la organización de la parte anterior; E: esquema de la organización de la parte posterior. Abreviaturas,
At: órgano sensitive atrial; Cg: ganglio cerebral; De: ciego dorsal; Dg: glándula dorsal; Dso: órgano
sensitivo dorsoterminal; Mg: intestino; Pe: cavidad paleal; Ph: faringe ; Pr: pericardio; Ra: aparato
radular; Sd: conducto de desove; Sr: receptáculo seminal; Vfg: órgano glandular ventral de la faringe.
69
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
450 jUm long). With one fold in the pedal
groove that enters the pallial cavity.
Dorsal pharynx gland present. Radula
with 22-25 small and identical teeth
with a wide base and a sharp sigmoid
end. Ventrolateral foregut glandular
organs type C/ Epimenia type. Two types
of erythrocytes: some elongated without
granulations and a longitudinal groove
and others spherical with granulations.
Opening of the posteriorly unpaired
spawning duct through a narrow tube
with a sphincter. Seminal receptacles
elongate, slightly lobulate. Small pallial
cavity without diverticles and respira-
tory folds, with an anterior ventral
groove. Without copulatory stylets.
With abdominal spicules. One dorsoter-
minal sense organ.
Description: Habitus: Specimen 43
mm long x 2.5 mm thick. Body of circu-
lar section, without protuberances and
keels, with a bulging and acuminate
posterior body and a truncated and
slightly bulging anterior body (Fig. 1A).
Very marked pedal groove. White
colour in alcohol.
Mantle and pedal groove: Thick cuticle
(up to 300 jum thick) with elongated epi-
demial papillae. Hollow acicular scle-
rites (130-450 jum long) with thick walls
(5-7 jum thick), slightly curved, with a
sharp distal end and a round proximal
end (Fig. IB). Sclerites are arranged in
several interlacing layers, with the distal
end slightly protruding from the cuticle,
most of them are tangential or skeletal.
The pedal groove presents one fold that
enters the pallial cavity.
Pallial cavity. Small, without diverti-
cles and respiratory folds and without
copulatory stylets. It leads onto the outside
through a narrow ventral longitudinal
opening (Fig. 1E). In its middle part, it pre-
sents thick and glandulous ventrolateral
walls with a large quantity of blood cells.
The anus is located in the dorsal región of
the cavity and the opening of the spawn-
ing duct is located ventrally to the anus,
where it has a central position. The pallial
cavity extends in its anterior región with
a ventral groove that continúes with the
pedal groove and into which the fold of
the pedal groove enters (Fig. 2C, D). The
ventral groove of the pallial cavity is
located below the posterior part of the
spawning duct and it leads onto the
outside through a narrow longitudinal
opening that continúes with the opening
of the pallial cavity. The lateral walls of
the ventral groove are thick and glandu-
lous, the abdominal spicules are located
on them.
Digestive system. It presents a
common atriobuccal cavity (Fig. ID).
The mouth opens dorsally in the poste-
rior part of the atriobuccal cavity. The
pharynx presents, dorsally and ven-
trally, a pair of small caeca near the
mouth, which possibly form when the
pharynx infolds. The anterior región of
the pharynx has thick lateral walls with
glands; a dorsal gland, which is made
up of a short duct into which the gland
cells open, is located in its dorsal región
(Fig. ID, 2A). The middle región pre-
sents a circular musculature, which is
thicker in its dorsal part (Fig. ID, 2B).
Wide posterior part of the pharynx with
a less developed musculature layer. The
radula is polystichous / polyserial, with
22-25 small, identical teeth in each trans-
verse row (25 jum long from the base to
their sharp end) with a wide base and a
sharp and sigmoid end (Fig. 1C). The
ventrolateral foregut glandular organs
are type C according to Salvini-
Plawen, 1978a or Epimenia type follow-
ing Handl and Todt, 2005, are made
up of a pair of ducts covered by a mus-
cular envelope inside which there are
glandular epithelial cells. They are two
long narrow tubes of circular section
(approximate diameter 250 pm) and
extend ventrolaterally to the intestine in
the middle area of the body (Fig. ID).
There is a muscular radular sac located
ventrally to the radula, into which the
ventrolateral foregut glandular organs
open through two non-glandulous
ducts. The pharynx opens into the intes-
tine through a short oesophagus, whose
walls are quite thick. In its anterior
región, the intestine has a narrow dorsal
caecum that reaches the buccal area and
has lateral constrictions caused by the
dorsoventral musculature. The rectum is
narrow, of circular section and very
70
GarcÍA-Álvarez ET AL.: Proneomeniidae from the Bentart-2006 Expedition
Figure 2. Proneomenia bulbosa sp. noy. A, B, C, D: cross sections corresponding to lines 1, 2, 3, 4
in Figure 1. Abbreviations, Dg: dorsal gland; Dso: dorsoterminal sense organ; Ph: pharynx; Re:
rectum; Sd: spawning duct.
Figura 2. Proneomenia bulbosa sp. nov. A, B, C, D: cortes en sección correspondientes a las líneas 1, 2,
3, 4 en la Figura 1. Abreviaturas, Dg: glándula dorsal; Dso: órgano sensitivo dorsoterminal; Ph:
faringe; Re: recto; Sd: conducto de desove.
cióse to the dorsal wall of the body due
to the large size of the spawning duct
(Fig. 2C, D). The anus is located in the
dorsal región of the pallial cavity, it is
wide and circular (approximate diame-
ter 450 jum).
Nervous system and sense organs. The
cerebral ganglion is located above the
anterior part of the pharynx and the
buccal ganglia are lateral to the poste-
rior part of the radular area (Fig. ID).
The atrium is located in the anterior part
of the common atriobuccal cavity, it has
numerous digitiform papillae on its
lateral walls and is delimited by a ven-
trolateral fold (Fig. lD).There is a dor-
soterminal sense organ in the dorsopos-
terior región of the body, above the
rectum (Fig. 1E, 2D).
Gonopericardial system. The gonads
were full of ova and spermatozoids, in
their anterior part they are not separated
and the blood sinus flows dorsally to
them, whereas they are separated at their
71
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figure 3. Dorymenia usarpi Salvini-Plawen, 1978. A: habitus; B: hollow sclerites; C: radular tooth;
D: schematic organization of the anterior body; E, F: cross sections corresponding to lines 1,2.
Abbreviations, De: dorsal caecum; Mg: midgut; Ph: pharynx; Ra: radular apparatus; Vfg: ventral
foregut glandular organ.
Figura 3. Dorymenia usarpi Salvini-Plawen, 1978. A: habitus; B: escleritos huecos; C: diente radular;
D: esquema de la organización de la parte anterior; E, F: cortes en sección correspondientes a las líneas
1, 2. Abreviaturas, De: ciego dorsal; Mg: intestino; Ph: faringe; Ra: aparato radular; Vfg: órgano glan-
dular ventral de la faringe.
posterior part and the sinus, full of blood
cells, is located between them. There are
two types of erythrocytes; some elon-
gated (up to 14 jum long) without granu-
lations or nucleus, with a longitudinal
groove, and other spherical (diameter up
to 10 jum) with granulations. The pair of
gonopericardioducts are well separated,
narrow (diameter of 90 jum) with slightly
folded walls, projecting into the anterior
part of the pericardium. The pericardium
is flat and wide, the heart has an anterior.
72
GarcÍA-Álvarez ET AL. : Proneomeniidae from the Bentart-2006 Expedition
Figure 4. Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen, 2000. A:
habitus; B: specimen with colonies of Bryozoa Celleporella sp.; C: hollow sclerites; D: radular teeth;
E: schematic organization of the anterior body; F: schematic organization of the posterior body.
Abbreviations, De: dorsal caecum; Di: diverticle; Dso: dorsoterminal sense organ; Mg: midgut; Pe:
pallial cavity; Ph: pharynx; Po: preatrial organ Pr: pericardium; Ra: radula apparatus; Sd: spawning
duct; Sr: seminal receptacle; Vfg: ventral foregut glandular organ.
Figura 4. Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Alvarez, Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen, 2000. A:
habitus; B: espécimen con colonias de Bryozoa Celleporella sp.; C: escleritos huecos; D: dientes radu-
lares; E: esquema de la organización de la parte anterior; F: esquema de la organización de la parte pos-
terior. Abreviaturas, De: ciego dorsal; Di: divertículo; Dso: órgano sensitivo dorsoterminal; Mg:
intestino; Pe: cavidad paleal; Ph: faringe; Po: órgano preatrial; Pr: pericardio; Ra: aparato radular; Sd:
conducto de desove; Sr: receptáculo seminal; Vfg: órgano glandular ventral de la faringe.
73
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
wide and unpaired ventricle and two
posterior and narrow auricles. Both peri-
cardioducts come out laterally from the
posterior part of the pericardium, they
present their walls encircled by a circular
musculature and the interior epithelium
is folded. They join the dorsoanterior part
of the spawning duct, in the same area
where the seminal receptacles join (Fig.
1E). Both seminal receptacles are long,
slightly lobulate and are located dorsally
to the anterior part of the spawning
ducts. The receptacles and the anterior
part of the spawning ducts were full of
spermatozoids. The spawning duct is
paired in its anterior half, representing
two tubular ducts that increase their
diameter from their anterior part to their
fusión and their walls are very glandu-
lous. The unpaired spawning duct filis
almost the whole body space (Fig. 1E,
2C), it opens into the pallial cavity
through a narrow tube with a folded
internal wall and a sphincter made up of
a layer of circular musculature (Fig. 1E,
2D). Laterally to this narrow end tube,
the spawning duct continúes in the pos-
terior part with two caeca of gland walls
that reach the anterior wall of the pallial
cavity (Fig. 1E, 2D), these caeca may form
when the spawning duct is retracted, as
these specimens protrude the end part of
the spawning duct and all the pallial
cavity.
Genus Dorymenia Fieath, 1911
Diagnosis: See Salvini-Plawen, 1978a; García-Álvarez and Salvini-Plawen, 2007
Type species : Dorymenia acuta Heath, 1911
Dorymenia usarpi Salvini-Plawen, 1978 (Fig. 3)
Material examined: 1 specimen 29 mm long x 1.8 mm wide, cut in serial sections, Low Island
(South Shetland Islands, Antárctica). Bentart-2006, Station LOW 45; coordinates 63° 43.1 71' S, 62°
21.16' W; 86 m depth.
Remarks: Dorymenia usarpi was known
so far from Bransfield Strait, 311-426 m
depth; South Orkney Islands, 485 m
depth; and Ross Sea 342-732 m depth
(Salvini-Plawen, 1978a). The first two
records are very cióse to the present one,
although they are at slightly greater
depths. Three dorsoterminal sense or-
gans were observed in the specimen
studied here, whereas the original de-
scription showed just one or two. Al-
though the bad histological State of the
posterior body of the specimen did not
make the description of the reproductive
system possible, the dorsolateral bags of
the pallial cavity typical of this species
were visible. Dorymenia hesperidesi, a
species cióse to D. usarpi described from
the South Shetland Islands, presents clear
differences regarding the size of the radu-
lar teeth and the erythrocytes shape (see
Table I in García-Álvarez et al., 2000).
Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen,
2000 (Figs. 4, 5)
Material examined: 5 specimens 34-51 mm long x 2.5-3 mm wide, cut in serial sections. Miers
Bluff, next to Falsa Bay (Livingston Island, South Shetland Islands, Antárctica); Bentart-2006,
Station St GA; coordinates: Start: 62° 46.13' S, 60° 27.02' W, End: 62° 43.565' S, 60° 27.486' W; 42.8-
50.2 m depth.
Remarks : The specimens studied those known bef ore. They are large spec-
herein were collected in the same geo- imens, over 3 cm long, with a slightly
graphic area and at a similar depth to acuminate posterior body and generally
74
GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ ET AL.\ Proneomeniidae from the Bentart-2006 Expedí tion
Figure 5. Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen, 2000. A, B, C,
D: cross sections corresponding to lines 1, 2, 3, 4 in Figure 4. Abbreviations, Cs: copulatory stylet;
De: dorsal caecum; Pe: pallial cavity; Ph: pharynx; Po: preatrial organ Sd: spawning duct.
Figura 5. Dorymenia menchuescribanae García-Álvarez, Urgorri and Salvini-Plawen, 2000. A, B, C,
D: cortes en sección correspondientes a las líneas 1, 2, 3, 4 en la Figura 4. Abreviaturas, Cs: estilete copu-
lador; De: ciego dorsal; Pe: cavidad paleal; Ph: faringe; Po: órgano preatrial; Sd: conducto de desove.
seem to be rolled up (García-Álvarez
et al., 2000). Some unknown characteris-
tics could be observed in these speci-
mens; they present a preatrial sense or-
gan in the atriobuccal cavity (Figs. 4E,
5A); the number of dorsoterminal sense
organs varíes from two to four; and the
opening of the spawning duct into the
ventral bag of the pallial cavity may
have a frontal or ventral position (Figs.
4F, 5C), which may possibly vary accord-
ing to the protruded State of the ventral
bag and even of the cavity during copu-
lation (see Table I in García-Álvarez et
al., 2000). It should be pointed out fi-
nally that several colonies of Bryozoa
Celleporella sp. were found on the cuticle
in one of the specimens (Fig. 4B).
75
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table I. Comparative table of the main specific characters of species belonging to the genus Pro-
neomenia.
DISCUSSION
Of the ten species described from the
genus Proneomenia, only Proneomenia ger-
lachei Pelseneer, 1901 comes from the
same biogeographic area and from a
similar depth (Bellingshausen Sea, 70° 00'
S, 81° 50' W, 550 m depth) (Salvini-
Plawen, 1978a) to Proneomenia bulbosa sp.
nov. Both species present clear differ-
ences (Table I): in P. gerlachei, the hollow
acicular sclerites only reach a length of
100 jum, in each radular row there are 40
teeth with a narrow base and a pointed
and small curved end, and the erythro-
cytes are oval (Salvini-Plawen, 1978a);
whereas in P. bulbosa sp. nov. the hollow
acicular sclerites are long, up to 450 jum
in length, each radular transverse row
comprises 22-25 teeth with a wide base
and a pointed sharp end, and it has two
types of erythrocytes: some are elongated
without granulations and with a longitu-
dinal groove, others are round with gran-
ulations (cf. Salvini-Plawen, 1978b).
Three species belong to the sub-
antarctic biogeographic area (Salvini-
Plawen, 1978a): Proneomenia epibionta
Salvini-Plawen, 1978, Proneomenia
stillerythrocytica Salvini-Plawen, 1978
(Falkland Islands, 646-845 m and 512-
586 m depth respectively) and Proneome-
nia praedatoria Salvini-Plawen, 1978
(Kerguelen Islands, and Drake Straight,
585-1240 m depth). In P. epibionta the
cuticle is thinner (200 jum) than in P
bulbosa sp. nov. (300 jum) and has dorsal
and lateral protuberances. The hollow
76
GarcÍA-Álvarez ET AL.: Proneomeniidae from the Bentart-2006 Expedí tion
Tabla I. Tabla comparativa de los principales caracteres específicos de las especies del género Proneome-
nia.
acicular sclerites only reach 200 jum in
length, in each radular row there are 42-
46 teeth and they are much longer (80-
100 jUm) than in P. bulbosa sp. nov. (25
jum), there is no dorsal pharynx gland
and the erythrocytes are oval. P. stillery-
throcytica has a 150 pm thick cuticle with
dorsal protuberances, it possesses 44-52
teeth per radular row similar to those of
P. epibionta and it has no dorsal pharynx
gland. In P. praedatoria the cuticle shows
dorsal protuberances up to 350 jum thick
and has 45 teeth per radular row with a
length of 40-50 pm (Table I).
The six remaining species shows
several differences (Table I): Proneomenia
acuminata Wirén, 1892 (W. Indian Ocean,
550 m depth; Florida and Massachusetts
(USA), 250-650 m depth) has no circular
musculature in the pharynx, the 28 teeth
per radular row have a narrow base and
a non-curved sharp end, erythrocytes are
oval with a central axis (Heath, 1918).
Proneomenia desiderata Kowalevsky and
Marión, 1887 (Marseille, 20-30 m depth)
has a r adula with 14 teeth per trans verse
row, it has no dorsal pharynx gland, the
pericardium shows two ventrolateral
bags and erythrocytes are drop-shaped
(Kowalevsky and Marión, 1887). Pro-
neomenia hawaiiensis Heath, 1905 and Pro-
neomenia insularis Heath, 1911 were col-
lected off Hawaii at 270-500 m and 1400-
1800 m depth respectively. P. hawaiiensis
has a radula with 38-45 teeth per trans-
verse row with a narrow base and
pointed ends. P. insularis has no dorsal
pharynx gland and the radula shows 34
77
Iberas, 27 (1), 2009
teeth per row (Heath, 1911). Proneomenia
sluiteri Hubrecht, 1880 (Arctic Ocean:
Barents Sea, 200-292 m depth; Spitzber-
gen (Svalbard Islands), Kara Sea to
Laptev Sea, 45-300 m depth) has 200 |Um
long sclerites, it has no dorsal pharynx
gland, the rectum presents a sphincter
and the spawning duct is divided in two
parts by a muscular constriction
(Hubrecht, 1881). Finally, Proneomenia
valdiviae Thiele, 1902 (Zanzibar (Indian
Ocean), 748 m depth) has a 100 jum thick
cuticle, 18 radular teeth per row and the
opening of the spawning duct in the
pallial cavity is very narrow and is
BIBLIOGRAPHY
García-Álvarez O. and Salvini-Plawen L.v.
2007. Species and diagnosis of the Families
and Genera of Solenogastres (Mollusca).
Iberus, 25 (2): 73-143.
García-Álvarez O. and Urgorri V. 2003.
Solenogastres molluscs from the BENTART
Collection (South Shetland Islands, Antárc-
tica), with a description of a new species.
Iberus, 21 (1), 43-56.
García-Álvarez O., Urgorri V. and Salvini-
Plawen L.v. 1998. Dorymenia troncosoi sp.
nov. (Mollusca Solenogastres: Proneomeni-
idae), a new species from the South Shet-
land Islands (Ántarctica). Polar Biology, 20:
382-387.
García-Álvarez O., Urgorri V. and Salvini-
Plawen L.v. 2000. Two new species of Do-
rymenia (Mollusca: Solenogastres: Pro-
neomeniidae) from the South Shetland Is-
lands (Antárctica). Journal of the Marine
Biological Association ofthe United Kingdom, 80:
835-842.
Handl C. and Todt C. 2005. Foregut Glands
of Solenogastres (Mollusca): Anatomy and
Revised Terminology. Journal ofMorphology,
265: 28-42.
Heath H. 1911. Reports on the scientific re-
sults of the expedition to the tropical Pacific,
XIV. The Solenogastres. Memoirs of the Mu-
seum ofComparative Zoology at Harvard College,
45(1): 1-182.
located in a ventral protuberance to the
anus (Thiele, 1902).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is part of the research pro-
jects: Bentart (MEC-Spanish govern-
ment REN2003-01881/ANT) and Diva-
Artabria II (MEC-Spanish government
CTM-2004-00740). We are grateful to Dr.
Nuria Anadón who sorted the new
species specimen during the Bentart 2006
Expedition. Our thanks also to Ian
Emmett for the English Translation.
Heath H. 1918. Solenogastres from the Eastern
Coast of North America. Memoirs ofthe Mu-
seum ofComparative Zoology at Harvard College,
45 (2): 183-263.
Hubrecht A. 1881. Proneomenia sluiteri gen. et
sp. n. with remarks upon the anatomy and
histology of the Amphineura. Niederlandische
Archivfür Zoologie, 9 (1): 1-75.
Kowalevsky A. and Marión A. 1887. Contri-
butions a l'histoire des Solenogastres ou
Aplacophores. Anuales du Musée d'Histoire
Naturelle de Marseille, Zoologie, 3 (1): 1-77.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1978a. Antarktische und
subantarktische Solenogastres-Eine Mono-
graphie: 1898-1974. Zoológica, Stuttgart: 128,
1-315.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1978b. Different blood-
cells in species-pairs of Solenogastres (Mol-
lusca). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 200: 27-30.
Thiele J. 1902. Proneomenia valdiviae n. sp. Wis-
senschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-
Expedition aufdem Dampfer " Valdivia ", 1898-
1899, 3: 167-174.
78
Iberus, 27 (1): 79-98, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacologia
The species of the genus Belgrandia (Caenogastropoda,
Hydrobiidae) in the Iberian Península
Las especies del género Belgrandia (Caenogastropoda, Hydrobiidae)
en la Península Ibérica
Emilio ROLÁN* and Alvaro de OLIVEIRA**
Recibido el 26-VI-2008. Aceptado el 25-III-2009
ABSTRACT
The species of the genus Belgrandia Bourguignat, 1 869 from the Iberian Península are dis-
cussed. Four taxa were previously known, but some of them were considered as having
subspecific level. A new species from Portugal is described: B. silviae spec. nov. Concho-
logical, anatómica! and radulae data are provided for all the species involved. The known
geographic distribution area is given, reporting new localities for some of the species.
RESUMEN
Se discuten las especies pertenecientes al género Belgrandia Bourguignat, 1 869 de la
Península Ibérica. Cuatro taxones eran previamente conocidas, aunque alguno conside-
rado en un nivel subespecífico. Se describe una nueva especie de Portugal: 8. silviae
spec. nov. Se muestran los caracteres de la concha y morfología de las partes blandas y
de las radulas de todas las especies incluidas. Se presenta la distribución conocida, apor-
tando nuevas localidades para algunas de ellas.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Belgrandia Bourguignat,
1869 (Caenogastropoda, Hydrobiidae) is
present in European springs and streams,
in Dalmatia, Southern France, Italy, Spain
and Portugal, according to Kabat and
Hershler (1993). In their work the evolu-
tion of this genus, as well as its relation-
ships and synonyms are commented
upon. Some species from Portugal were
described by French and Germán authors
(Paladilhe, 1867; Clessin, 1878;
Boettger, 1963). Nobre (1930) did not
admit the validity of these taxa and con-
sidered that all represent only forms of B.
gibba (Draparnaud, 1805). This species
lives in Southern France (Kabat and
Hershler (1993) and it is improbable
that populations of the same species are
found as far away as Portugal, as admit-
ted by Boeters (1988). Rolán (1999)
mentioned B. lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867)
informing that it is a species in risk of
extinction due to the small area where it
lives. Haase (2000) published a revisión
on this genus in Europe includindg the
species in the Iberian Peninsula.
Recently, new samplings collected
by the júnior author allowed us to get a
better idea of the distribution area. The
study of all this new material allowed
us to compare populations collected in
several localities in Portugal. Other
samples had been collected by the
sénior author years ago.
* Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
** Av. Lagos, 219-Y, 4405-658 Gulpilhares, Portugal.
79
Iberas, 27 (1), 2009
As far as we know, only one species
is present in Eastern Spain, with few
populations dispersed along a wide dis-
tribution range between Cataluña and
Comunidad Valenciana. The situation in
Portugal is quite the reverse, the genus
exhibiting a significant radiation. In an
area of only 90x50 km, four species are
present, one of which, B. silviae spec.
nov., is here described as new to Science.
This territory corresponds to the north-
ern half of the Lusitanian Basin, in
central western Portugal, which in the
Upper Pliocene was still submerged.
Abbreviations:
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
MHNG Museum d'Histoire Naturelle,
Geneve
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural de la
Universidad de Santiago de Com-
postela (collection of Emilio Rolán)
MNHN Museum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, Paris
BMNH The Natural History Museum,
London
MHNP Museu Nacional de Historia
Natural, Faculdade de Ciéncias do
Porto (former Museu de Zoologia
Augusto Nobre)
SMF Naturmuseum und Forschungsan-
stalt Senckenberg, Frankfurt
CAO Collection of Alvaro de Oliveira
CHB Colection of Hans Boeters
sp live specimen
s empty shell
TAXONOMIC PART
Family Hydrobiidae Troschel, 1857
Genus Belgrandia Bourguignat, 1869
Type species: Cyclostoma gibbum Draparnaud, 1805.
Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867) (Figs. 1-12, 69)
Hydrobia lusitanica Paladilhe, 1867. Rev. Mag. Zool. Puré appl. (2); 19: 92, pl. 21, figs. 1-4. [Type
locality: Fonte das Lágrimas, after Coimbra, Portugal].
Belgrandia occidentalis Clessin, 1878. Malakozool. BL, 25: 120, lám. 4, fig. 7-9. [Type locality:
Coimbra, Portugal].
Belgrandia gibba Draparnaud, 1805. In Nobre (1930: 205, fig. 36).
Type material: Lectotype designated and figured by Haase (2000: fig. 3 E) in MHNG.
Type locality: Fonte das Lágrimas,
Other material studied: About 150 sp, leg. E. Rolán, (9-March-1989; 30-June-1990); 132 sp, leg. A.
de Oliveira (5-January-2008). All from Fonte das Lágrimas, Quinta das Lágrimas, (NE4849), Coimbra,
province of Beira Litoral, Portugal.
Description : Shell (Figs. 1-8) oval-
cylindrical, somewhat elongated, whorls
convex, with deep suture.
Protoconch (Fig. 9) with about 1
whorl, the separation from the teleo-
conch being very difficult to see; diame-
ter: nucleus about 90 ?m; first ? whorl,
about 240 ?m. Microsculpture (Fig. 10)
with minute depressions, which with
high magnification (Fig. 11) are seen as
having geometrical shape and separa-
tion wall elevated and with numerous
lines.
Teleoconch with about three whorls,
with some irregular spiral lines and
prosocline growth lines.
Aperture slightly ovoid, continuous
and with a fine peristoma, a little undu-
lating. Externally, a little before the end
of the spire, there is an axially elongated
thickening, very constant, only absent
from juveniles.
80
ROLÁN AND OliveirA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 1-10. Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867). 1-8: shells, 1.6, 1.7, 1.5, 1.4, 1.6, 1.4, 1.5,
1.8 mm, Fonte das Lágrimas, Coimbra; 9: protoconch; 10: detail of the microsculpture.
Figuras 1-10. Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867). 1-8: conchas, 1,6; 1,7; 1,5; 1,4; 1,6; 1,4; 1,5 y
1.8 mm, Fonte das Lágrimas, Coimbra; 9: protoconcha; 10: detalle de la microescultura.
81
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
I U 10 }im 12 10 fim
Figures 11, 12. Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867). 11: microsculpture of the protoconch; 12:
radula.
Figuras 11, 12. Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867). 11: microescultura de la protoconcha; 12:
rádula.
Dimensions between 1.4 and 1.9 mm
in height.
Animal (also described by Nobre,
1930) dark, with tentacles dark with a
white line in the middle; the dorsum of
the head is dark, only light on spaces
around the eyes and the anterior part of
the snout; behind the eyes there is a tri-
angular space with cream or cream-yel-
lowish colour; the penis (Fig. 69) is elon-
gated, sharp-pointed, with an angle
near its base, a little black on its anterior
part, with a small appendix on its left
side. The solé of the foot is white.
The radula (Fig. 12) is typical of
hydrobids, having a central tooth with
about 10 cusps, the central one more
prominent; lateral teeth similar, about
ten cusps; the marginal ones are differ-
ent, one with near 30 small and elon-
gated cusps, and the other spoon like
with only few cusps.
Habitat : Under decaying leaves and
among moss, always in shady areas
with running water. This species coex-
ists with 4 other freshwater gastropods:
Theodoxus cf. fluviatilis (Linnaeus, 1758),
Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray J. E.,
1843), Mercuria tachoensis (Frauenfeld,
1865) and Phy sella acuta (Draparnaud,
1805).
Distribution : Known from the type
locality only (Fig. 78).
Remarks : The species has been men-
tioned by Nobre (1930, as B. gibba), and
the figure of Nobre (1930, fig. 36) is
characteristic of the specimens from
Quinta das Lágrimas. Also represented
in Boeters (1988) and commented by
Rolán (1990) who described the soft
parts and represented the shell, with
their characteristics and typical deposits
of calcium carbonatum.
Hydrobia lusitanica Paladilhe, 1867 is
clearly defined by the material studied
from the type locality. The ñame Bel-
grandia gibba Draparnaud, 1805, which
Nobre (1930) considered to be the valid
one for all the Portuguese species, con-
cerns a species only present in Corsica
and the South of France, probably
referred erroneously for the northwest
of Italy by Cossignani et al. (1995), and
so, improbably related with the Por-
tuguese species.
Belgrandia lusitanica had been recorded
by Rolán (1990) considering it in high risk
of extinction. At present it is satisfactory
82
ROLÁN AND OliveirA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 13-22 Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. 13: holotype, 2.0 mm (MNCN); 14-19: Paratypes, 1.9,
2.0, 1.7, 1.8, 1.8 and 1.9 mm (MNCN); 20: detail of the aperture in the holotype; 21: proto-
conch; 22: microsculpture of the protoconch.
Figuras 13-22 Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. 13: holotipo, 2,0 mm (MNCN); 14-19: Paratipos, 1,9;
2,0; 1,7; 1,8; 1,8 y 1,9 mm (MNCN); 20: detalle de la abertura en el holotipo; 21: protoconcha; 22:
microescultura de la protoconcha.
83
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
to known that the species is still living.
But it is very important to take action to
protect the fu ture of the species.
The taxon Belgrandia occidentalis
Clessin, 1878 is also mentioned for
Coimbra, and for this reason it surely
applies to the same species and must be
considered as a júnior synonym.
According to Dance (1986) the Clessin
collection in the Stuttgart Museum was
totally destroyed in the Second World
War.
Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. (Figs. 13-25, 70-73)
Belgrandia gibba Draparnaud, 1805. In Nobre (1930: 206 [partim]).
Type material: Holotype (Fig. 13) plus 5 dry and 70 wet paratypes in MNCN (15.05/47571). Other
paratypes in BMNH (10 sp), MHNS (80 sp), MHNP (50 sp), MNHN (10 sp), CHB (50 sp), CAO (160
sp), all live collected from the type locality, leg. A. de Oliveira, 12-February-2008 and 7-June-2008.
Type locality: In the spring of Alcabideque (NE4539), a small village 3 km east of Condeixa-a-
Nova, 10 km to the south of Coimbra (and of Quinta das Lágrimas, type locality of B. lusitanica),
province of Beira Litoral, Portugal. This spring is historically related to the oíd Román town of
Conímbriga, about 2 km to the west; the Romans built an aqueduct in order to carry the water into
town. Later the Suevan people destroyed it. Presently, the water of this spring is carried to Ribeira
de Bruscos and down the stream to the Ega River, a tributary of the Mondego River on its left
margin.
Etmology: The specific ñame is dedicated to Silvia Casteloa, the júnior author's wife, for the com-
panionship and constant help in the field.
Description : Shell (Figs. 13-19) oval-
cylindrical, somewhat elongated,
whorls very convex, with a deep suture.
Protoconch (Fig. 21) with about 1
whorl or a little more, the separation
with the teleoconch being very difficult
to see; diameter: nucleus about 130 ?m;
first ? whorl, about 260 ?m. Microsculp-
ture (Fig. 22) with a rough surface with
minute depressions and numerous
irregular lines.
Teleoconch with a little more than
three whorls, which are very convex
and show on their lower part an angula-
tion which, on the last whorl, changes
into a wide not very prominent spiral
cord. The microsculpture (Fig. 23) is
made of curved growth lines prosocline
in the subsutural area and orthocline on
the lower part.
Aperture almost circular, very irreg-
ular, continuous and undulating fine
peristoma (Fig. 20). Externally, a little
before the end of the spire, there is a
prominent elevation which is placed on
the spiral cord, not elongated axially
and which forms in the inner part of the
aperture an important depression. It is
not present in juveniles.
Dimensions between 1.7 and 2.1 mm
in height. The holotype is 2.0 mm high.
Animal dark, with tentacles dark with
a white line in the middle; the dorsum of
the head is dark with only white circular
spaces around the eyes, which are black;
the dark colour extends to the anterior part
of the snout, which is white; behind the
eyes there is a triangular space with cream
or cream-yellowish colour; the solé of the
foot is white. The penis (Figs. 70-73) is
wide, sharp, with a narrow base, and one
or two undulations on its internal border;
a black longitudinal line is visible near the
external border.
The radula (Figs. 24, 25) is typical of
hydrobids, similar to the previous one
but with less prominent lateral cusps in
the rachidian tooth and also in the inter-
nal border of the lateral teeth.
Habitat: Under stones (limestone)
lying on a coarse sandy bottom; always
on surfaces devoid of all (macro) vegeta-
tion.
Distribution: Known from the type
locality only (Fig. 78).
Remarles: The species had been men-
tioned by Nobre (1930: 206) as B. gibba
(Draparnaud).
84
RoláN AND OLIVEIRA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 23-25. Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. 23: microsculpture of the teleoconch; 24, 25: radula;
detail of the radula.
Figuras 23-25. Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. 23: microescultura de la teleoconcha; 24, 25: radula;
detalle de la radula.
Its collecting was a surprise, being
so cióse to the type locality of Belgrandia
lusitanica. The prominence on the exter-
nal part of the last whorl which is corre-
sponded by a wide excavation within
the aperture suggested to us that the
species could employ it to retain an egg
as other species of Hydrobids (for
example, Arganiella tartessae Arconada
and Ramos, 2007 and Tarraconia rolani
Ramos, Arconada and Moreno, 2000 do
this in the umbilicus). Anyway, it could
be a similar strategy to that found in the
family Coralliophillidae Chenu, 1859, in
which the female has a similar place in
the aperture to retain a capsule with
85
Iberas, 27 (1), 2009
Figures 26-38. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 26-30: shells, 1.9, 1.8. 1.7, 1.7 and 1.9 mm,
from Alcobertas; 31-33: shells, 1.8, 1.7 and 1.7 mm, from Alviela; 34-36: shells, 1.6, 1.3 and 1.7
mm, from Lis; 37: shell, 1.9 mm, from An$os, 38: microsculpture of the teleoconch, shell from
Alcobertas.
Figuras 26-38. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 26-30: conchas, 1,9; 1,8; 1,7; 1,7 y 1,9 mm,
de Alcobertas; 31-33: conchas, 1,8; 1,7 y 1.7 mm, de Alviela; 34-36: conchas, 1,6; 1,5 y 1,7 mm, de
Lis; 37: concha, 1,9 mm, de Angos, 38: microescultura de la teleoconcha, concha de Alcobertas.
86
ROLÁN AND Oliveirá: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 39-44. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 39, 40: Protoconch and microsculpture,
shell from Alcobertas; 41, 42: Protoconch and microsculpture, shell from Alviela; 43: Protoconch,
shell from Lis. 44: Protoconch, shell from An^os.
Figuras 39-44. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 39, 40: Protoconcha y microescultura, concha
de Alcobertas; 41, 42: Protoconcha y microescultura, concha de Alviela; 43: Protoconcha, concha de Lis.
44: Protoconcha, concha de Angos.
87
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
eggs. But further collecting trying to
make an immediate examination in
order to confirm this point did not show
any egg in this place. So we do not
know the function of this prominence-
excavation. When the animal is
retracted, the operculum is placed
deeper than this excavation.
Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867)
is geographically the closest species, but
the morphological differences are very
evident, being smaller in size, the
prominence of the last whorl is smaller,
axially disposed, without a correspond-
ing internal excavation near the aper-
ture, the protoconch is slightly smaller,
the penis has a more evident small
apendix.
Like Belgrandia lusitanica and B.
alcoaensis, this species must be consid-
ered in high risk of extinction, due to its
limited range, despite the fact that the
type locality is nowadays preserved as
an archaeological site.
Belgrandia heussi C. R. Boettger, 1963 (Figs. 26-48, 75, 76)
Belgrandia heussi C. R. Boettger, 1963. Arch. Molí., 92: 40. [Type locality: Lis River, wich has its
springs on the northern slope of Macizo Calcário Estremenho, and the mouth about 30 km
south of the Mondego River, in the center of Portugal].
Type material: Holotype in SMF (167898).
Type locality: Rio Liz, Portugal.
Other material studied: Spring of the Angos River (NE3625), northern slope of Serra de Sicó,
province of Beira Litoral, 210 sp, leg. A. de Oliveira, 3-April-2008 (MHNS: 100 sp; CAO: 110 sp).
Springs of Abiul (NE3914), Southern slope of Serra de Sicó, province of Beira Litoral, 20 sp, leg. S.
Casteloa and A. de Oliveira, 7-June-2008 (MHNS: 10 sp; CAO: 10 sp). Spring of the Lis River
(ND1992), northern slope of Macizo Calcário Estremenho, province of Beira Litoral, 240 sp, leg. A.
de Oliveira, 15-February-2008 (MHNS: 100 sp; CAO: 140 sp). Spring of Alcobertas (ND0864), South-
ern slope of Macizo Calcário Estremenho, province of Ribatejo, about 320 sp, leg. S. Casteloa and
A. de Oliveira, 9-December-2007 (MHNS: 160 sp; CAO: 160 sp). Springs of the Alviela River (ND2466),
Southern slope of Macizo Calcário Estremenho, province of Ribatejo, 34 sp, leg. S. Casteloa and A.
de Oliveira, 8-December-2007 (MHNS: 30 sp; CAO: 4 sp). Olho de Mira (ND2376), in a depression
valley, south of Mira de Aire, central Macizo Calcário Estremenho, province of Estremadura, 4 sp,
leg. E. Rolán, 19-May-2003.
Description : Shell (Figs. 26-37)
conical, somewhat elongated, whorls
convex, with marked suture, fragüe.
Protoconch (Figs. 39-45) with about
one whorl, difficult to see because the
separation with the teleoconch is not
usually visible; diameter is variable in
the above mentioned populations:
nucleus between 100 and 150 ?m; first ?
whorl between 200 and 260 ?m.
Microsculpture rough with minute
depressions and irregular lines; in some
shells from Lis (type locality) this sculp-
ture is more attenuated (Figs. 44, 45).
Teleoconch with about three convex
whorls with a deep suture, the spiral
microsculpture scarcely appreciable and
only visible under high magnification
(Figs. 46, 47) and having slightly proso-
cline growth lines.
Aperture slightly and regularly
ovoid, and a continuous and fine peris-
toma. Externally, there is an axial thick-
ening slightly away from the end of the
spire, which does not correspond with
any internal depression into the aper-
ture.
Dimensions between 1.5 and 1.9 mm
in height.
Animal dark only on the dorsum of
the head and between the eyes, with
tentacles dark with a white line in the
middle; the penis (Figs. 75, 76) is folded
on its base and sharp at the extreme,
presenting two small prominences one
to each side and sometimes a black line
in the middle; the solé of the foot is
white.
The radula (Fig. 48) is typical of
hydrobids, similar to that of the previ-
88
ROLÁN AND Oliveira: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 45-48. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 45: microsculpture of the protoconch, shell
from Lis; 46: microsculpture from a shell of Alcobertas; 47: microsculpture from a shell of Alviela;
48: radula, from a specimen of Alviela.
Figuras 45-48. Belgrandia heussi C.R. Boettger, 1963. 45: micro escultura de la protoconcha, concha
de Lis; 46: microescultura de una concha de Alcobertas ; 47: microescultura de una concha de Alviela;
48: rádula, de un ejemplar de Alviela.
89
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figures 49-57. Belgrandia alcoaensis C.R. Boettger, 1963. 49-54: shells, 1.9, 1.7, 1.8, 1.7, 1.7 and
1.6 mm (MHNS); 55, 56: protoconchs; 57: microsculpture of the teleoconch.
Figuras 49-57. Belgrandia alcoaensis C.R. Boettger, 1963. 49-54: conchas, 1,9; 1,7; 1,8; 1,7; 1,7 y
1.6 mm (MHNS); 55, 56: protoconchas; 57: microescultura de la teleoconcha.
90
ROLAN and OliveirA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 58-61. Belgrandia alcoaensis C. R. Boettger, 1963. 58: operculum; 59-61: radulae.
Figuras 58-61. Belgrandia alcoaensis C. R. Boettger, 1963. 58: opérenlo; 59-61: rádulas.
91
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
ous species, with the cusps in the
rachidian and lateral teeth a little
shorter and less numerous.
Habitat : Under stones (limestone)
lying on a coarse sandy bottom; always
on surfaces devoid of all (macro) vegeta-
tion; in shady areas with running water.
This species coexists with 5 other fresh-
water gastropods: Theodoxus cf. fluviatilis
(Linnaeus, 1758)[Angos, Alcobertas,
Alviela], Potamopyrgus antipodarum
(Gray J. E., 1843)[Abiul, Lis, Alcobertas,
Alviela], Radix balthica (Linnaeus,
1758)[Angos, Abiul], Ancylus fluviatilis
(Müller O. E, 1774) [Abiul, Lis, Alviela]
and Physella acuta (Draparnaud, 1805)
[Abiul, Alviela].
Distribution : Contrarily to the other
three Portuguese species, only known
from the type locality, Belgrandia heussi
is present in several springs dispersed in
three provinces of central western Por-
tugal: Beira Litoral (Angos, Abiul, Lis),
Estremadura (Olho de Mira) and Rib-
atejo (Alcobertas, Alviela) (Fig. 78).
Remarks : The material examined from
several localities, is not enterely uniform,
small differences existing between them.
However, after the study of the morphol-
ogy of the shells, protoconchs, and soft
parts we could not find enough differences
to consider them as different species.
Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe, 1867)
may be distinguished by its deeper
suture and convex whorls; the peris-
tome more undulating, the thickening of
the external lip slightly stronger and
cióse to the end of the spire; the suture
is less marked on the last whorl. The
penis has a smaller prominence on its
right side; the radula shows a more
marked cusp in the rachidian and inter-
nal border of the lateral teeth.
Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. is con-
stantly larger, with deeper suture, the
peristoma more undulating, the external
prominence of the last whorl larger and
not disposed axially, the growth lines
curved and the aperture has a deep cave
near the end of the spire.
Belgrandia alcoaensis C. R. Boettger, 1963 (Figs. 49-61, 74)
Belgrandia heussi alcoaensis C. R. Boettger, 1963. Arch. Molí, 92: 42. [Type locality: Alcoa River,
wich has its springs in the western slope of Macigo Calcário Estremenho, and after joining the
Baga River, has its mouth about 35 km south of the Lis River, in the center of Portugal].
Type material: A paratype represented in Haase (2000: fig. 3 H).
Type locality: Rio Alcoa, Portugal.
Other material studied: More than 1000 sp, leg. E. Rolán, 22-November-1991 (MHNS); 26 sp, leg.
A. de Oliveira, 12-February-2008 (CAO). Both from the spring of the Alcoa River (ND0476), in the
small village of Chiqueda de Cima, at 2 km east of Alcobaga, western slope of Macigo Calcário
Estremenho, province of Estremadura, Portugal.
Description: Shell (Figs. 49-54)
conical, somewhat elongated, whorls
fíat or scarcely convex, with marked
suture, fragüe.
Protoconch (Figs. 55, 56) with a little
less than one whorl, the separation with
the teleoconch being usually visible;
diameter about 300 ?m: nucleus about
125 ?m; first ? whorl, about 250 ?m.
Spiral microsculpture with minute
depressions.
Teleoconch with about three or three
and a quarter whorls, with some irregu-
lar, very depressed and scarcely visible
spiral striae and slightly prosocline
growth lines (Fig. 57).
Aperture slightly ovoid, with a small
deviation of the border of the external lip
in the place where the spiral cords ends;
there is a continuous and narrow peris-
toma. Externally, it is not possible to see
any thickening near the external border.
Dimensions between 1.6 and 1.9 mm
in height.
Animal dark only on the dorsum of
the head and between the eyes, with
tentacles dark with a white line in the
middle; the penis (Fig. 74) is folded on
92
ROLÁN AND OLIVEIRA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Figures 62-68. Belgrandia boscae (Salvaña, 1887). 62-64: shells, 2.0, 1.9, 1.9 mm; 65: protoconch;
66, 67: microsculpture of the protoconch; 68: radula.
Figuras 62-68. Belgrandia boscae ( Salvaña , 1887). 62-64: conchas, 2,0; 1,9 y 1,9 mm; 65:
protoconcha; 66, 67: micro escultura de la protoconcha; 68: rddula.
93
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figures 69-77. Soft parts and penis. 69: Belgrandia lusitanica, Quinta das Lágrimas; 70-73: B.
silviae spec. nov., and several variations of the penis, Alcabideque; 74: B. alcoaensis , Alcoa River;
73, 76: B. heussi, and variation of the penis, from the spring of Lis River; 77: B. boscae. Fuente de
la Corroba, Tarragona.
Figuras 69-77. Partes blandas y penes. 69: Belgrandia lusitanica, Quinta das Lágrimas; 70-73: B.
silviae spec. nov., con algunas variaciones del penis, Alcabideque; 74: B. alcoaensis, Río Alcoa; 75, 76:
B. heussi, con variaciones del penis, del nacimiento del Río Lis; 77: B. boscae. Fuente de la Corroba,
Tarragona.
its base and sharp at the extreme, pre-
senting two small prominences one to
each side and sometimes a black line in
the middle; the solé of the foot is white.
Operculum (Fig. 58) ovoid, translu-
cent, with the nucleus a little lateral.
The radula (Figs. 59-61) is typical of
hydrobids, similar to that of the previ-
ous species although the cusps in the
rachidian and lateral teeth are a little
shorter and less numerous.
Habitat : Under stones (limestone)
lying on a coarse sandy bottom; always
on surfaces devoid of (macro) vegeta-
don. This species coexists with 4 other
freshwater gastropods: Theodoxus cf. flu-
viatilis (Linnaeus, 1758), Potamopyrgus
antipodarum (Gray J.E., 1843), Ancylus
fluviatilis (Müller O.F., 1774) and Phy-
sella acuta (Draparnaud, 1805).
Distribution : Known from the type
locality only (Fig. 78).
Remarks : Belgrandia alcoaensis was
considered as a subspecies by Haase
(2000: 185) after having only examined
one shell (paratype). In the present
work, we have examined many speci-
mens and consider it very different from
the other Portuguese species due to the
almost fíat whorls, especially the last
one, the prominent spiral cord and the
lack of any axial thickening.
94
ROLÁN AND Oliveira: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
Species
Localities
o
o
o
o
B. lusitanico
B. silviae
B. alcoaensis
B. heussi
B. boscae
1 . Quinta das Lágrimas
2. Alcabideque
3. Alcoa
4. Lis
5. Aleo bertas
6. Alviela
7. Angos
8. Abiul
9. Olho de Mira
10. Carroba
1 1 . Benafer
12. Navajas
13. Castellnovo
14. Segorbe
1 5. Siete Aguas
Figure 78. UTM 100 km squares distribution map of Belgrandia in Spain.
Figura 78. Mapa de distribución de Belgrandia en España. Cuadrículas UTM de 100 km de lado.
Belgrandia lusitanica, Belgrandia heussi
and Belgrandia silviae spec. nov. may be
distinguished by their deeper suture
and more convex whorls, the last one
not angulated, as well as the existence of
a prominence or axial thickening on the
external lip.
Like Belgrandia lusitanica and Bel-
grandia silviae spec. nov., this species must
be considered in high risk of extinction,
due to its limited range. This risk was
recently increased by human interven-
tion on the bed of the Alcoa River, from
near its spring down the stream to the
center of the village of Chiqueda de
Cima. In the course of the last sampling
in the site (February-2008), only a few
specimens were observed.
95
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table I. Schematic differences of the characters of the species of Belgrandia in Iberian Península.
Tabla I. Diferencias entre las especies de Belgrandia de la península ibérica.
Belgrandia boscae (Salvaña, 1887) (Figs. 62-68, 77)
Hydrobia boscae Salvaña, 1887. Crón. Cient., Barcelona, 10: 141. [Type locality: In the springs of
Gandía, Valencia, Spain]
Type material: After Boeters (1988) and Haase (2000), untraceable.
Type locality: Springs at Gandía, Valencia.
Material examined: YK11. 100 sp, road from Valencia to Teruel, in Navajas (Castellón) in front of
the hotel Navas Altas (29-September-1990)(MHNS). YK02. 50 sp, Benafer, in the river near Fuente
de los Nogales (Castellón) (29-September-1990)(MHNS). YK11. 50 sp, road from Segorbe to Artana,
in Castellnovo, near the river (30-September-1990). YK11. 100 sp, Segorbe (Castellón), Fuente de
los 50 caños (6-October-1990)(MHNS). XJ77. about 100 sp, Road from Requena to Valencia, in Siete
Aguas (Fuente del Retiro, at 2 Kms) (8-October-1990) (MHNS). BF91. About 100 sp, Tarragona,
Fuente de la Torre de la Carroba (3-July-1991) (MHNS).
Description: Shell (Figs. 62-64) oval-
cylindrical, somewhat elongated,
whorls convex, with deep suture.
Protoconch (Fig. 65) with about 1
whorl, the separation with the teleo-
conch being very difficult to see; diame-
ter: nucleus about 130 ?m; first ? whorl,
about 275 ?m. Microsculpture (Figs. 66,
67) with minute depressions, which
under high magnification (Fig. 67) are
seen to present depressed cavities.
Teleoconch with about three whorls,
with only prosocline growth lines.
Aperture slightly ovoid, continuous
and with a fine peristoma, a little undu-
lating and e verted. The contact area with
the previous whorl is small. Externally, a
little before the end of the spire, there is
96
ROLÁN AND OliveirA: The genus Belgrandia in the Iberian Península
an axial elongated thickening, very con-
stante only absent from juveniles.
Dimensions between 1.6 and 2.2 mm
in height.
Animal dark, with tentacles with
some pigment on the borders; the
dorsum of the head is dark, only light
on spaces around the eyes and the ante-
rior part of the snout; behind the eyes
there is a triangular space with cream or
cream-yellowish colour; the penis (Fig.
77) is elongated, sharp-pointed, with an
angle near its base, a little black on its
anterior part, and sometimes with a
small apendix on its left side, not always
appreciable. The solé of the foot is
white.
The radula (Fig. 68) is typical of
hydrobids, with a central tooth with
about 10 cusps, the central one scarcely
more prominent; lateral teeth similar,
with about ten cusps; the marginal ones
are different, one with nearly 30 small
and elongated cusps, and the other
spoon-like with only few cusps.
Habitat: Under leaves and stones in
very puré water in shady places.
Distribution : This species was found
in several locations in the provinces of
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Jesús Méndez
who made the SEM photos in the
Centro de Apoyo Científico y Tec-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Boeters H.D. 1988. Westeuropáische
Moitessieriidae, 2) and Westeuropáische Hy-
drobiidae, 7). Moitessieriidae und Hydrobi-
idae in Spanien und Portugal (Gastropoda:
Prosobranchia). Archiv für Molluskenkunde,
118(4-6): 181-261.
Boettger C.R. 1963. Zur Kenntnis der in Por-
tugal vorkommenden Süfiwasserschnecken
aus der Hydobiiden-Gattung Belgrandia Bour-
guignat. Archiv für Molluskenkunde, 92(1-2):
39-43.
Clessin S. 1878. Das Genus Belgrandia
Bour g.Nachrichtblatt der Deutschen Malakozo-
ologischen Gesellschaft, 10(8): 127-130.
eastern Spain: Cuenca, Valencia, Castel-
lón and Tarragona (see Boeters, 1988).
Remarks : Boeters (1988) presented
this species under the ñame Belgrandia
cf. marginata (Michaud, 1831) but indi-
cating clear differences from the Spanish
species of Belgrandia versus the topo-
types of the true B. marginata. Therefore
he States that perhaps the ñame for
them could be Belgrandia boscae. We use
this ñame because besides the morpho-
logical differences a large distance sepa-
rates these populations from those of B.
marginata.
There are quite clear differences
from the Portuguese species, such as
(Table I):
-Belgrandia lusitanica is the most
similar, but the protoconch is smaller.
-Belgrandia silviae has a very impor-
tant prominence at the end of the spire
and an excavation inside the aperture,
and also a spiral cord;
-Belgrandia heussi has a suture which
is not so deep, the thickening of the last
whorl less evident.
-Belgrandia alcoaensis usually lacks
the thickening and has a well marked
spiral cord.
nológico (CACTI) of the University of
Vigo. Antonio A. Monteiro revised the
English text.
Cossignani T. AND Cossignani V. 1995. Atlante
delle conchiglie terrestri e dulciacquicole ita-
liane. LTnformatore Piceno. Ancona. 208 pp.
Dance S.P., 1986. A history of shell collecting.
Brill and Backhuys, Leiden. 265 pp, 32 pls.
Kabat K. and Hershler R. 1993. The Proso-
branch Snail Family Hydrobiidae (Gas-
tropoda: Rissooidea): Review of Classification
and Supraspecific Taxa. Smithsonian Contri-
bution to Zoology, 547: 1-94.
Haase M. 2000. A revisión of the genus Bel-
grandia, with the description of a new species
from France (Caenogastropoda: Hydrobi-
idae). Malacologia, 42(1): 171-201.
97
Iberus , 27 (1), 2009
Paladilhe A. 1867. Nouvelles miscellanées
malacologiqu.es . Revue et magasin de Zoologie
puré et appliquée (2)19: 38-41, 42-53, 88-95.
Nobre A. 1930. Moluscos terrestres, fluviais e das
aguas salobras de Portugal. Companhia Editora
do Minho, Barcelos.
Rolán E. 1990. Belgrandia lusitanica (Paladilhe,
1867) (Gastropoda, Hydrobiidae), especie
endémica de Portugal, en riesgo de extinción.
Publicaqóes Ocasionáis da Sociedade Portuguesa
de Malacologia, 15: 11-16.
98
Iberus, 27 (1): 99-102, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
On the egg capsule of Marginella glabella (Linné, 1758)
Sobre la cápsula ovígera de Marginella glabella (Linné, 1758)
Franck BOYER*
Recibido el 1 -XI 1-2008. Aceptado el 8-IV-2009
ABSTRACT
The purse-shaped egg capsule of Marginella glabella (Linné, 1758) is described and pic-
tured from a sample collected in Lanzarote, Canary Islands.
Due to the occurrence of the same kind of egg capsule in M. goodalli and to the occur-
rence of plano-convex egg capsules in all other Marginella species documented for this
character, the shape of the egg capsule is proposed as a further feature characterizing the
M. glabella species group.
RESUMEN
Se describe y se muestra por primera vez la cápsula ovígera de Marginella glabella
(Linné, 1758), a partir de una muestra obtenida en Lanzarote, Islas Canarias.
Considerando la ocurrencia del mismo tipo de cápsula ovígera en M. goodalli y la ocu-
rrencia de cápsulas plano-convexas en todas las demás especies de Marginella para las
que existen datos de este carácter, se propone considerar la forma de la cápsula ovígera
como un rasgo adicional para caracterizar el grupo de especies en torno a M. glabella.
INTRODUCTION
Knowledge of the morphology of
the egg capsules of marginelliform gas-
tropods was summarized and discussed
by Coovert (1986), through the presen-
taron of egg capsules attributed to 16
different species.
Twelve of these species belong to the
Marginellidae sensu Coovert and Coovert,
1995 (2 Dentimargo species, 3 Glabella
species, 1 Haloginella species, 2 Marginella
species, 2 Prunum species and 2 Volvarina
species) and 4 belong to the Cystiscidae
sensu Coovert and Coovert, 1995 (2 Gran-
ulina species and 2 Persicula species).
On the basis of these data, the Mar-
ginellidae species are said to have a
plano-convex egg capsule, except for
Marginella goodalli Sowerby, 1825 from
off the Guiñean zone, which has a
* 1 10 chemin du Marais du Souci, 93270 Sevran, France
purse-shaped egg capsule. The Cystisci-
dae species are said to also have a
plano-convex egg capsule, except for
Persicula cornea (Lamarck, 1822), from
the Guiñean zone too, which also has a
purse-shaped egg capsule.
It is important to note that, in most
cases, the specific attribution of the egg
capsules recorded by Coovert (1986)
requires further confirmation, the laying
of eggs not having been specifically
observed and thus the larva being attrib-
uted with low certainty to a given species.
Knudsen (1950), who is the principal
reference used by Coovert (1986),
himself admitted that the method of
Identification "is not absolutely reliable
and possibly some incorrect identifica-
tions have been made". However, due to
99
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
the fact that the attribution of purse-
shaped egg capsules to M. goodalli and to
P. cornea is proposed by Knudsen (1950)
with credible arguments, the heterogene-
ity of egg capsule types within both Mar-
ginellidae and Cystiscidae must be provi-
sionally accepted, at least between genera
and possibly within some of them.
More recent records of plano-convex
egg capsules of Marginellidae species were
made by Gofas and Fernandes (1988)
concerning Marginella spinacia Gofas and
Fernandes, 1988 from Sao Tomé, by Fer-
nandes and Rolán (1991) concerning M.
eveleighi Tomlin and Shackleford, 1913
from Principe, and by Penchaszadeh
and Rincón (1996) concerning Prunum
prunum (Gmelin, 1791) from Venezuela.
The identification of the egg capsules of
these two Marginella species was made
with a high degree of certainty on the basis
of the morphologic characters of the larvae,
whereas the identification was made with
absolute certainty for the Prunum species
through direct observation of the clutch
raised in an aquarium.
The problem raised by the hetero-
geneity of the egg capsule types within
each of the two marginelliform families
Marginellidae and Cystiscidae was not
tackled by Coovert (1986), by Coovert
and Coovert (1995) or by subsequent
authors, despite the fact that any inter-
grades between the two capsule types
under discussion is unknown.
The discovery of a purse-shaped egg
capsule attributable to Marginella glabella
(Linné, 1758), type species of the genus
Marginella Lamarck, 1799, is presented
herein. This new record allows us to re-
assess the issue of the heterogeneity of
egg capsule types in the genus Mar-
ginella, together with the apparent
synapomorphies characterizing the M.
glabella species group.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The data concerning the clutch of M.
glabella comes from material and observa-
tions communicated by José Hernández.
J. Hernández found a purse-shaped
egg-capsule (Figs. 1-2) fixed under a stone
at 3-5 m off Playa Quemada, situated on
the southeastern coast of Lanzarote,
eastern Canary Islands. The egg capsule
contained one larva cióse to hatching. This
larva was removed from the capsule by
opening the suture line defined along the
cutting edge of the "purse" (Fig. 3) and it
was photographed out of the capsule (Fig.
4). The shell of this larva was compared
with the protoconch of live collected adult
specimens of M. glabella (Fig. 5) sampled
in the vicinity by Francisco Sicilia and
Javier López- Vicente.
The terms “plano-convex" and "purse-
shaped" egg capsule are used by prefer-
ence, respectively, to the terms "lenticular
or lens-shaped capsule" and "lenticular
capsule with a fíat base" used by Coovert
(1986). This preference is due to the inad-
equately descriptive meaning of "lentic-
ular" applied to the cases considered, and
to the ambiguity introduced by the use of
the same word for defining two different
types of capsule morphology. As a matter
of fact, the two types of egg capsules exam-
ined differ not only in the way they are
attached to the substrate (via a basal mem-
brane extending beyond the capsule walls
in the case of the plano-convex type, versus
via a more or less produced stalk in the
case of the purse-shaped type), but also in
the way the capsules are torn open at the
hatching stage [along a suture line sur-
rounding the hemispherical upper side of
the capsule quite cióse to the base in the
plano-convex type (see in Coovert, 1986),
versus escape from an "exit hole" at the top
of the capsule (see in Knudsen, 1950: 121)
or along the cutting edge of the lateral
borders (this work)].
RESULTS
The attribution of the purse-shaped
egg capsule found off Playa Quemada
to the species M. glabella is based on the
morphology of the larval shell removed
from the capsule.
The outline of this capsule looks quite
like that of a chicken egg horizontally ori-
ented and put on a ventrally fixed short
stem. The capsule is laterally compressed,
smooth, hyalinous light honey-amber. The
100
BOYER: On the egg capsule of Marginella glabella
Figures 1-5. Marginella glabella, Playa Quemada, Lanzarote. 1,2: egg capsule, view from both
sides, width= 7 mm; 3: hatching of the larva; 4: larval shell with animal retracted; 5: adult shell,
length= 26 mm.
Figuras 1-5. Marginella glabella. Playa Quemada , Lanzarote. 1-2: cápsula ovígera, vistas desde ambos
lados , ancho = 7 mm; 3: eclosión de la larva; 4: concha larvaria con el animal retraído; 5: concha
adulta, longitud= 26 mm.
total height of this capsule is 5 mm, the
height of the "purse" is 4 mm, its width is
7 mm, and the stalk length is 1 mm. The
shell of the larva perfectly matches by its
shape, its consistency, its colour and its size
(1,3 mm at the base line of its upper
quarter, 2 mm at its wider diameter) the
protoconch (width: 1,3 mm) of the M.
glabella adult specimens found in the vicin-
ity (compare Figures 4 and 5). No other
gastropod species from this geographical
area show a similar protoconch.
DISCUSSION
M. glabella is shown to have an egg
capsule of the purse-shaped type, like
the congeneric species M. goodalli. The
egg capsule described by Knudsen
(1950) for M. goodalli is quite different
from that of M. glabella, due to its taller,
more produced, subcylindrical outline,
but both species can be said to have the
same type of egg capsule, deeply differ-
ent from the plano-convex egg capsules
101
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
of the supposedly congeneric M. cleryi,
M. spinacia and M. eveleighi, and of the
closely related Glabella adansoni (Kiener,
1834), Dentimargo aureocincta (Stearns,
1872) and D. cairoma (Brookes, 1924).
Other characters shared by M.
glabella and M. goodalli are rather
inflated non-sculptured orange to
reddish shells with white marks or
spots, and orange animáis with white
spots or dots. On the basis of personal
observations of live specimens in
Senegal, the species proposed to belong
to the M. glabella species group together
with M. glabella and M. goodalli are M.
aurantia (Lamarck, 1822), M. desjardini
(Marche-Marchad, 1957), M. sebastiani
(Marche-Marchad and Rosso, 1979) and
M. lamarcki (Boyer, 2004). The specific
validity of other taxa commonly linked
to this group (like M. irrorata Menke,
1828 and M. pseudosebastiani Mattavelli,
2001) remains dubious and requires
further investigation.
The possession of the same type of
egg capsule is considered here as a
further synapomorphy defining the M.
glabella species group as very distinct
from the other Marginella, Glabella and
Dentimargo species groups.
A noticeable plasticity is often
observed at the individual level in egg
capsules of marine gastropods, and a
noticeable disparity in the details of the
capsule morphology is often observed
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Coovert G.A. 1986. A Review of Marginellid
Egg Capsules. Marginella Marginaba, 1 (4):
13-19.
Coovert G.A. and Coovert H.K. 1995. Revi-
sión of the Supraspecific Classification of the
Marginelliform Gastropods. The Nautilus,
109 (2-3): 43-110.
Fernandes F. and Rolán E. 1991. The Mar-
ginellidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) of
Principe Island (República de Sao Tomé e
Principe). Journal ofConchology, 34: 85-90.
Gofas S. and Fernandes F. 1988. The Mar-
ginellidae of Sao Tomé, West Africa. Journal
ofConchology, 33: 1-30.
between species belonging to the same
genus. For instance, Rolán and Raybaudi
Massilia (1995) showed the high vari-
ability of the egg capsules in Conus mediter-
ránea and Moreno and Templado (1995)
demonstrated that the sibling species Nas-
sarius cuvieri and N. unifasciatus from the
Lusitanian Province have very distinct egg
capsules despite the similarity of their
shell characters. However the type of egg
capsule seems to be homogeneous in
monophyletic groups : purse-shaped type
in C. mediterraneus and cushion-shaped
type in the N. cuvieri / N. unifasciatus series.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This article is dedicated to the late
José Maria Hernández (Galdar, Gran
Canaria), who contributed through his
personal observations in the fíeld, dona-
tion of the referred material and photog-
raphy of the sample.
I must thank also Philippe Maestrati
(Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle,
París) for the photography of the adult
specimen of M. glabella, Alain Robin (Le
Mesnil Saint Denis, France) for arrang-
ing the digital píate and Andrew Wake-
field (Buckhurst Hill, England) for
editing the English text.
Serge Gofas (Málaga University)
revised the manuscript and highly con-
tributed to improve it.
Knudsen J. 1950. Egg capsules and Devel-
oppement of some Marine Prosobranchs
from the Tropical West Africa. Atlantide Re-
port, 1: 85-130, figs. 1-31.
Moreno D. and Templado J. 1995. El com-
plejo de especies " Nassarius cuvieri- N. uni-
fasciatus” (Gastropods, Nassaridae)enelSur
de España. Iberus, 12 (2): 33-47.
Penchaszadeh P.E. and Rincón A. 1996. Egg
Capsules and Development of Prunum pru-
num (Gmelin, 1791) (Prosobranchia: Margi-
nellidae) from the Venezuelan Caribbean.
The Veliger, 39 (1): 83-86.
Rolán E. and Raybaudi Massilia G. 1995.
Spawning and development of Mediter-
ranean Conus: aquarium observations (Proso-
branchia: Conidae). Argonauta, 9 (1-6): 9-22.
102
Iberus, 27 (1): 103-117, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Diversity and spatial distribution of the gastropod fauna
(Mollusca: Gastropoda) on subtidal sedimentary substrata
of the Ensenada de Baiona (Galicia, NW Iberian Península)
Diversidad y distribución espacial de la fauna de gasterópodos
(Mollusca: Gastropoda) de los sustratos sedimentarios submareales
de la Ensenada de Baiona (Galicia, NW Península Ibérica)
Juan MOREIRA*1, Eva CACA BE LOS** and Jesús S. TRONCOSO**
Recibido el 16-XII-2008. Aceptado el 8-IV-2009
ABSTRACT
Gastropods (Mollusca: Gastropoda) are an important component of soft-bottom faunas ¡n
temperóte latitudes. The diversity and distribution of gastropod fauna on sedimentary sub-
strata at the Ensenada de Baiona (Galicia, NW Iberian Península) was studied by means
of quantitative sampling. The total number of species was similar to that found in other
Galician "rías" dominated by sandy sediments and greater than in other "rías", whose
sediments are mostly muddy. Gastropod assemblages in gravelly and sandy bottoms of the
inlet were, in general, more diverse than those in muddy sediments.
The distribution and composition of gastropod assemblages in the Ensenada de Baiona is
related to the granulometric composition and median grain size of the sediment, which
are, in turn, influenced by the intrinsic hydrodynamic conditions of the inlet. These patterns
of gastropod distribution are similar to those previously reported for other benthic taxa in
the same area.
RESUMEN
Los moluscos gasterópodos (Mollusca: Gastropoda) constituyen un importante componente
de la fauna de fondos blandos en latitudes templadas. La diversidad y distribución de la
fauna de gasterópodos de los sustratos sedimentarios de la ensenada de Baiona (Galicia,
NW península Ibérica) fue estudiada por medio de muestras cuantitativas. El número total
de especies encontrado en la ensenada fue similar al registrado en otras rías de Galicia
caracterizadas por presentar sedimentos principalmente arenosos, y mayor que en las
rías dominadas por sedimentos fangosos. La distribución y composición de las comunida-
des de gasterópodos en la ensenada de Baiona está relacionada con la composición gra-
nulométrica y la mediana del tamaño de grano del sedimento, que están determinadas a
su vez por las particulares condiciones hidrodinámicas de la zona. Estos patrones de dis-
tribución son similares a los registrados para otros grupos zoológicos en esta misma ense-
nada.
* Estación de Bioloxía Mariña da Graña, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Casa do Hórreo, Rúa da
Ribeira 1, E-15590, A Graña, Ferrol, Spain.
** Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Facultade de Ciencias, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n,
Universidade de Vigo, E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
1 Corresponding author: juan.moreira@usc.es
103
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
INTRODUCTION
Benthic faunas inhabiting subtidal
soft-bottoms are influenced by a
number of interacting abiotic and biotic
factors, such as granulometry, hydrody-
namism, organic matter content, preda-
tion and competition (see, for example,
Wildish, 1977; Gray, 1981; Wilson,
1991). Spatio-temporal fluctuations of
those factors determine, in many cases,
the patterns of distribution and compo-
sition of benthic assemblages (Stubble-
field, Permenter and Swift, 1977). The
characterization of those patterns is of
paramount importance to evalúate the
relative role of natural perturbances and
of that derived from anthropogenic
activities (Underwood, 1992).
The Galician rias (NW Spain) have
highly diverse benthic faunas due, in
part, to the great variety of habitats and
sediments present there (p.e. López-
Jamar, 1981; Mora, 1982; Troncoso
and Urgorri, 1993). The seashore
around the rias is highly populated and
therefore subjected to many perturba-
tions such as those due to the culture of
bivalves on rafts, construction of
harbour facilities, industrial activities
and disposal of sewages (López-Jamar,
1978; López-Jamar, González and
Mejuto, 1986; Castellanos, Hernán-
dez-Vega and Junoy, 2003). The effects
of these perturbations mostly transíate
into organic enrichment and changes in
sedimentary composition (López-
Jamar, 1978; López-Jamar and Mejuto,
1985), which, in turn, affect the composi-
tion of benthic assemblages and the sta-
bility of the populations of many species
(López-Jamar et al ., 1986).
There are still many areas of the
Galician rías whose benthic fauna is
little known, such as the Ensenada de
Baiona, an inlet located to the south of
the Ría de Vigo. Mollusca are an impor-
tant component of soft-bottom benthic
faunas (Troncoso and Urgorri, 1993;
Guerra-García and García-Gómez,
2004) and their study might be also
useful to check the State of benthic
assemblages (Boening, 1999). Lists of
species of the molluscan fauna present
in the Ensenada de Baiona were pro-
vided by MacAndrew (1849), Hidalgo
(1886), Rolán (1983) and Rolán, Otero
and Rolán-Álvarez (1989); Moreira,
Quintas and Troncoso (2005) studied
the distribution of subtidal molluscan
assemblages as a whole. Nevertheless,
the composition and distribution of sub-
tidal gastropod assemblages as such
have not been described from this area
yet. In fact, the description of gastropod
assemblages has often been neglected in
papers dealing with soft-bottom
mollusc faunas. In general, more atten-
tion is paid to bivalves which are, on
many occasions, more abundant than
gastropods in sedimentary environ-
ments (Denadai and Amaral, 1999;
Rueda, Fernández-Casado, Salas and
Gofas, 2001; Moreira et al., 2005). In
this paper, we present a list of gastropod
species found during the sampling pro-
grammes developed by the group of
Adaptaciones de Animales Marinos
from the University of Vigo between
1995 and 1997 in the Ensenada de
Baiona. The description of gastropod
assemblages in the soft bottoms of the
inlet is also provided and relates them
to sediment characteristics and other
environmental features. This work is
part of a baseline study on the benthic
assemblages from subtidal sediments of
the Ensenada de Baiona; temporal
dynamics of gastropod assemblages will
be described elsewhere.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Study area
The Ensenada de Baiona is located
on the Southern margin of the mouth of
the Ría de Vigo, between 42° 07' N - 42°
09' N and 08° 51' W - 08° 49 'W (Fig. 1).
Salinity ranges from 32%0 in winter to
35%o in summer in the outer area, and
from 28%o to 35%o in the harbour area.
The northern and eastern margins of the
inlet are bordered by sandy beaches,
while the western outer margin is
exposed to oceanic swell and winter
winds (Alejo, Austin, Francés and
VTT as, 1999); the harbour jetty pro vides
104
Moreira ET AL.: Spatial distribution of gastropods on subtidal sedimentary substraía
Figure 1. Location of the Ensenada de Baiona and sampling sites. Sites are grouped according to
Cluster and Simprof analysis.
Figura 1. Localización de la ensenada de Baiona y de los puntos de muestreo. Los puntos de muestreo se
agrupan en función de los resultados de los análisis Cluster y Simprof.
shelter to the Southern area around the
harbour of Baiona. Most of its soft
bottoms are sandy; the distribution of
sediments follows a gradient in grain
size (Alejo et al., 1999; Moreira et al.,
2005). Sediments of the outer mouth of
the inlet are composed of gravel and
coarse sand; in the central area the dom-
inant fractions are médium and fine
sand, while sediments in northern and
eastern margins are constituted mostly
by fine and very fine sand (Moreira et
al., 2005). Sediments in the harbour area
range from sandy mud to mud with
percentages of silt / clay of up to 90%.
Sampling
In order to study diversity and distri-
bution of gastropods, quantitative sam-
pling was done at the Ensenada de Baiona
in December 1995 at 21 subtidal sandy
sites (Table I). Four of these sites were
further studied with a monthly periodic-
ity between February 1996 and February
1997 (results will be published in a forth-
coming paper). Five replicates were taken
at each site using a van Veen grab with a
sampling area of 0.056 m2 thus covering
a total area of 0.28 m2 on each site. Samples
were sieved through a 0.5 mm mesh and
fixed in 10% buffered formalin for later
sorting and identification of the fauna. An
additional sediment sample was taken at
each site to determine granulometric com-
position, median grain size (Qso), sorting
coefficient (So), carbonates (%) and total
organic matter (TOM, %). The following
sedimentary fractions were considered:
gravel (GR, > 2 mm), very coarse sand
(VCS, 2-1 mm), coarse sand (CS, 1-0.5 mm),
médium sand (MS, 0.5-0.25 mm), fine sand
(FS, 0.25-0.125 mm), very fine sand (VFS,
105
Iberas, 27 (1), 2009
TABLE I. COORDINATES AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAM-
PLING SITES IN THE ENSENADA DE BAIONA. Qso, MEDIAN GRAIN SIZE;
C03=, CARBONATE CONTENT; TOM, TOTAL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT.
Tabla I. Coordenadas y características físicas de los puntos de maestreo en la ensenada de Baiona. Q50,
mediana del tamaño de grano; C03=, contenido en carbonatos; TOM, materia orgánica total.
0.125-0.063 mm), and silt/clay (< 0.063
mm). Sedimentary types were character-
ized according to Junoy and Viéitez
(1989). Carbonate content (%) was esti-
mated by treating of the sample with
hydrochloric acid. The total organic matter
content (TOM, %) was estimated from the
weight loss on combustión at 450°C for 4
hours.
Data analyses
The total abundance (N), number of
species (S), the Shannon- Wiener diversity
Índex (H', log2) and Pielou's evenness (J)
were calculated for each site. Gastropod
assemblages were determined through
non-parametric multivariate techniques
(Field, Clarke and Warwick, 1982), using
the Primer 6 software package (Clarke
and Gorley, 2006). Similarities between
samples were determined based on the
abundance data of species. These data
were transformed prior to the analyses by
applying square root in order to down-
weigh the contribution of the most abun-
dant species. Data were previously aver-
aged across the five replicates for each site
thus obtaining a centroid. From the simi-
106
MOREIRA ETAL.\ Spatial distribution of gastropods on subtidal sedimentary substrata
Figure 2. Dendrogram of classification of sampling sites according to valúes of Bray-Curtis similar-
ity Índex calculated on data of species abundance. Groups of sites (A-E) were determined accord-
ing to Simprof results.
Figura 2. Dendrograma de clasificación de los puntos de muestreo en función del índice de similitud de
Bray-Curtis calculado según los datos de abundancia de las especies. Las agrupaciones de los puntos de
muestreo (A-E) fueron determinadas según el análisis Simprof.
larity matrix, a classification of the sam-
pling sites was done by Cluster analysis
based on the group-average sorting algo-
rithm, obtaining a dendrogram. Clusters
of sites determined as statistically signif-
icant by profile test Simprof (p < 0.05) were
considered as having a similar gastropod
composition. Non-metric multidimen-
sional scaling (nMDS) was used to produce
a visual representation of the ordination
of centroids. Cluster analysis was also done
to check for species affinities (inverse
analysis) based on the abundance data of
the numerically dominant species, i.e.
those whose abundance is >1% of the total
abundance.
The possible relationship between
gastropod fauna and the measured envi-
ronmental variables was explored using
the Bio-Env procedure (Primer). All
variables expressed in percentages were
previously transformed by log (x+1).
The following variables were considered
in these analyses: TOM, granulometric
fractions (GR, CS, MS, FS, VFS), median
grain size, sorting coefficient, skewness,
kurtosis, temperature and depth, while
carbonates, VCS, silt/clay and pH were
excluded due to their high correlation
with other variables (r>0.9, p<0.01).
Sites 1 and 4 were discarded for Bio-Env
analysis because of their stony nature,
which could make interpretation of the
analyses difficult, and insufficient sedi-
ment sample from site 4.
RESULTS
Cartography of subtidal sediments in
1995 yielded a total of 1631 specimens
belonging to 47 species (Table II). 14 addi-
tional species were found during the tem-
poral study (from February 1996 to Feb-
ruary 1997), bringing the total number of
species up to 61. The richest family in
number of species was Pyramidellidae
(10) and the best represented in number
of individuáis was Caecidae (23.8% of total
abundance; Table III). About half of the
107
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table II. Systematic list of all gastropod species found in the Ensenada de Baiona during the car-
tography (December 1995) and the temporal study (* February 1996-February 1997).
Tabla II. Lista sistemática de todas las especies de gasterópodos encontradas en la ensenada de Baiona
durante el estudio cartográfico (Diciembre 1995) y temporal (*, Febrero 1996-Febrero 1997).
Subclass PROSOBRANCHIA
Family Patellidae Rafinesque, 1815
Ansates pellucida (Linneo, 1758)
Family Acmaeidae Carpenter, 1857
Tectura virgínea (Müller, 1776)
Family Fissurellidae Fleming, 1822
Emarginula rosea Bell, 1824
Puncturella noachina (Linneo, 1771)
Family Trochidae Rafinesque, 1815
Gibbula cineraria (Linneo, 1758)
Gibbula magus (Linneo, 1758)
Gibbula túmida (Montagu, 1803)
Jujubinus exasperatus (Pennant, 1777)
Family Phasianellidae Swainson, 1 840
Jricolia pullus (Linneo, 1758)
Family Cerithiidae Fleming, 1822
Bittium reticulatum (da Costa, 1778)
Family Turritellidae Woodward, 1851
Turritella communis Risso, 1826
Family Eulimidae H. Adams i A. Adams, 1 853
Melanella alba (da Costa, 1778)
Family Rissoidae Gray, 1847
Alvania beani (Hanley in Thorpe, 1 844)
Manzonia crassa (Kanmacher, 1 798)
Onoba semicostata (Montagu, 1 803)
*Pusillina inconspicua (Alder, 1 844)
*Rissoa guerinii Réduz, 1 843
Rissoa lilacina Réduz, 1843
Rissoa parva (da Costa, 1778)
Family Caecidae Gray, 1850
*Caecum glabrum (Montagu, 1803)
Caecum tracbea (Montagu, 1 803)
Family Calyptraeidae Blainville, 1824
Calyptraea cbinensis (Linneo, 1758)
*Crepidula fornicata (Linneo, 1758)
Family Naticidae Gray, 1840
Euspira pulcbella (Risso, 1 826)
Family Muricidae Rafinesque, 1815
Ocenebra erinaceus (Linneo, 1758)
Family Nassariidae Iredale, 1916
Nassarius incrassatus (Strom, 1 768)
Nassarius pygmaeus (Lamarck, 1 822)
Nassarius reticulatus (Linneo, 1758)
Family Conidae Fleming, 1822
Bela nébula (Montagu, 1 803)
Mangelia attenuata (Montagu, 1 803)
Mangelia coarctata (Forbes, 1840)
Family Omalogyridae Sars, 1878
Omalogyra atomus (Philippi, 1841)
Family Pyramidellidae Gray, 1 840
Chrysallida decussata (Montagu, 1803)
Chrysallida fenestrata (Jeffreys, 1 848)
Chrysallida indistincta (Montagu, 1 808)
Chrysallida terebellum (Philippi, 1 844)
Eulimella acicula (Philippi, 1 836)
Odostomia conoidea (Brocchi, 1814)
Odostomia eulimoides Hanley, 1 844
Odostomia scalaris MacGillivray 1 843
Odostomia unidentata (Montagu, 1 803)
*0ndina diapbana (Jeffreys, 1 848)
*Jurbonilla lactea (Linneo, 1 758)
Monillo pasillo (Philippi, 1 844)
Family Murchisonellidae Casey, 1 905
Ebala nitidissima (Montagu, 1 803)
Subdass OPISTHOBRANCHIA
Family Acteonidae d'Orbigny, 1835
Acteon tornatilis (Linneo, 1758)
Family Diaphanidae Odhner, 1814
*Diaphana minuta Brown, 1 827
Family Retusidae Thiele, 1925
Cylichnina umbilicata (Montagu, 1803)
Retusa mammillata (Phillipi, 1836)
*Retusa obtusa (Montagu, 1803)
Retusa truncatula (Bruguiére, 1 792)
Volvulella acuminata (Bruguiére, 1 792)
Family Philinidae Gray, 1850
Philine aperta (Linneo, 1 767)
Philine punctata (Adams, 1 800)
Philine scabra (Müller, 1 784)
Family Cylichnidae Lovén, 1 846
Cylicbna cylindracea (Pennant, 1 777)
Family Limapontiidae Gray, 1847
*Limapontia depressa Alder & Hancock, 1862
Family Akeridae Odhner, 1922
*Akero bullata Müller, 1776
Family Dorididae Rafinesque, 1815
Doris verrucosa Linneo, 1758
108
MOREIRA ETAL.: Spatial distribution of gastropods on sub tidal sedimentary substrata
Figure 3. nMDS ordination of sampling sites showing groups determined by Cluster and Simprof
analysis.
Figura 3. Ordenación nMDS de los puntos de muestreo indicando los grupos determinados por los aná-
lisis Cluster y Simprof.
species found were represented by less
than 10 individuáis each. The best repre-
sented taxa in the inlet (present in at least
50% of the sampling sites) were the nas-
sariid, Nassarius reticulatus (Linneo, 1758),
and the naticid, Euspira pulchella (Risso,
1826). The total number of species per site
ranged from 1-2 (sites 3, 11 and 16; Table
IV) to 17-19 (sites 4, 17-18). Maximal total
gastropod densities were found at sites
18, 4 and 21 (> 700 ind. m'2) and the lowest
ones at sites 3, 11 and 16 (< 40 ind. m'2).
The highest valúes of diversity (H') were
recorded at sites 17 and 18 (H' > 3.00 bits);
those sites also showed a high evenness
(J > 0.70). Diversity was smaller than 1.0
bits in sites 3, 6, 11, 16 and 20; the lowest
valúes of evenness were found at sites 3
and 20 (J < 0.40).
Gastropod assemblages
The dendrogram obtained by
Cluster analysis showed five major
groups of sites (Fig. 2): group A (sites 8,
9, 12, 13, 14; coarse and médium sand),
group B (st. 1 and 4, gravel), group C (st.
16, 19, 20 and 21; sandy mud and mud),
group D (st. 3, 6, 7, 11 and 15; fine sand
sites at the margins of the inlet) and E
(st. 2, 5, 10, 17 and 18; fine sand sites at
the centre of the inlet). These groups
were found to have an internal structure
according to the Simprof test (p < 0.05).
The graphic representation of the nMDS
analysis showed an ordination of sites
which agrees with dendrogram groups
and distribution of sedimentary types
(Fig. 3). Group A was located in the
outer and central parts of the inlet and
was characterized by Caecum trachea
(Montagu, 1803), Cylichnina umbilicata
(Montagu, 1803) and Philine spp. Group
B was composed of sites located in the
northern outer area and was numeri-
cally dominated by Tectura virgínea
(Müller, 1776), Calyptraea chinensis
(Linneo, 1758) and Gibbula spp. Sites of
group C were situated around the
109
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table III. Abundance of dominant species (abundance >1% of total abundance) in each sampling
site expressed as individuáis per m2.
harbour of Baiona; the group was char-
acterized by a small total number of
species (10); Bittium reticulatum (da
Costa, 1778) was the dominant species
followed by Retusa truncatula
(Bruguiére, 1792). Group D was distrib-
uted along the margins of the inlet; this
group was the poorest in terms of
number of species and individuáis.
Group E was composed of fine sand
sites located in the central area and was
characterized by the highest total
number of species (29); N. reticulatus
and C. umbilicata were the numerically
dominant species.
According to Simper analysis, dis-
similarities between groups A (coarser
sandy sediments) and B (gravel) were
determined by C. trachea, T. virgínea,
Gibbula túmida (Montagu, 1803), C.
umbilicata and Philine aperta (Linneo,
1767) (up to 50% of total dissimilarity);
the species that most contributed to dis-
similarities between A and D (fine-sand
sites at the margins of the inlet) were C.
trachea, C. umbilicata and N. reticulatus
(up to 55% of dissimilarity) and
between A and E (fine-sand sites at the
central area of the inlet) were the same
aforementioned species together with P.
aperta and Cylichna cylindracea (Pennant,
1777) (up to 50% of dissimilarity). Most
of the total dissimilarity (up to 50%)
between groups D and E were due to C.
umbilicata, N. reticulatus, C. cylindracea,
R. truncatula, Nassarius pygmaeus
(Lamarck, 1822), E. pulchella and Bela
nébula (Montagu, 1803); those species
were more abundant in group E than in
group D. The species B. reticulatum and
N. reticulatus were responsible for up to
50% dissimilarity between groups C
(mud sites) and D while B. reticulatum,
reticulatus C. umbilicata, E. pulchella and
C. cylindracea were the species most con-
tributing to total dissimilarity between
groups C and E (up to 50%).
Species affinities
The dendrogram obtained by
inverse analysis done on the abundance
data of the species considered as domi-
nant in each site showed four main
groups at a 40% similarity level (Fig. 4).
110
MOREIRA ET AL.'. Spatial distribution of gastropods on subtidal sedimentary substrata
Tabla III. Abundancia de las especies dominantes (abundancia >1% de la abundancia total) en cada
punto de muestreo expresada como individuos por m2.
Group 1 included species mostly found
at sites dominated by coarser sandy
fractions (site group A), i.e. C. trachea,
Philine aperta and P. punctata (Adams,
1800). Group 2 was composed of species
whose higher abundance was found in
gravelly sites (site group B); those
species were T. virgínea, C. chinensis,
Gibbula cineraria (Linneo, 1758) and G.
túmida. Group 3 was composed of B.
reticulatum, R. truncatula and Chrysallida
terebellum (Philippi, 1844); those species
were present in fine-sand and mud sites
but were more abundant in the latter
sediments. Group 4 comprised the
largest group of species, which were
mainly found in site groups D and E;
group 4 included species that were
widespread across fine-sand sites such
as N. reticulatus, E. pulchella and C.
umbilicata.
Gastropod fauna and environmen-
tal variables
The Bio-Env procedure showed that
a number of combinations of the
selected environmental variables had
high correlations with abundance data
of gastropod species through the Spear-
man rank correlation coefficient (pw >
0.70 in many cases). The best combina-
tions of variables were those composed
of organic matter, sorting coefficient,
coarse sand, médium sand, very fine
sand and skewness. The median grain
size was the variable that alone showed
the highest correlation (pw = 0.57), fol-
lowed by very fine sand (pw = 0.51).
The nMDS ordination of sites with
superimposed valúes of the mentioned
variables showed that sites appeared
distributed from left to right following
decreasing valúes of median grain size;
sites with greater content in very fine
sand were located in the central part of
the graphic representation (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
Quantitative sampling showed that
the soft-bottom gastropod fauna from
the Ensenada de Baiona is rich and
diverse in number of species (61) and its
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table IV. Total number of species per 0.28 m2 (S), total abundance per m2 (N), Shannon-Wiener’s
diversity índex (H\ log2) and Pielou’s evenness (J) for each sampling site. The group to which each
sampling site belongs according to multivariate analyses is also indicated.
Tabla TV Número total de especies por 0.28 m2 (S), abundancia total por m2 (N), índice de diversidad
de Shannon-Wiener (H\ log2) y equidad de Pielou (]) para cada punto de muestreo. Se indica el grupo
al que pertenece cada punto de muestreo de acuerdo con los análisis multivariante.
composition is similar to those reported
from other areas in the northern Iberian
Peninsula (e. g. Martínez and Adar-
raga, 2003; Troncoso, Moreira and
Urgorri, 2005; Lourido, Gestoso and
Troncoso, 2006). In addition, the total
number of species is within the same
range as those recorded in studies done
in other Galician rias which covered
similar types of sediments. For example,
Troncoso, Parapar and Urgorri
(1993) and Garmendia, Sánchez-Mata
and mora (1998) reported, respectively,
62 and 66 species from the Ría de Ares-
Betanzos, and Lourido et al. (2006)
found 60 species at the Ría de Aldán.
Although the aforementioned rias are
much larger than the Ensenada de
Baiona they share with the latter a
similar gastropod diversity. Those rias
are characterized by having a large
variety of sedimentary types, which are
usually distributed following a gradient
in grain size, i.e. coarser sediments
appear at the mouth of the rias and finer
sediments towards the internal areas
(Troncoso & Urgorri, 1993; Lourido
et al., 2006). In general, this sedimen-
tary diversity usually translates into
more diverse benthic faunas than those
which appear in areas where sediments
are more homogeneous. Thus, many of
the Southern rias (Rías Baixas) which are
dominated by muddy sediments with
high contents of organic matter have
poorer gastropod assemblages. For
instance, López-Jamar (1981) reported 7
species of gastropods from the Ría de
Muros and 8 species from the Ría de
Pontevedra (López-Jamar, 1978) while
112
Moreira ET AL.: Spatial distribution of gastropods on subtidal sedimentary substrata
Figure 4. Dendrogram of classification of dominant species according to valúes of Bray-Curtis sim-
ilarity Índex calculated on data of species abundance.
Figura 4. Dendrograma de clasificación de las especies dominantes en función del índice de similitud de
Bray-Curtis calculado según los datos de abundancia de las especies.
C acábelos. Quintas and Troncoso
(2008) found 34 species at the Ensenada
de San Simón (Ría de Vigo).
Multivariate analyses showed that
distribution and composition of gastro-
pod assemblages are strongly related to
the granulometric composition and the
median grain size of the sediment. In
fact, the same patterns have also been
found for distribution of polychaetes
and peracarid crustaceans in the same
area (Moreira, Quintas and
Troncoso, 2006; Moreira, Lourido
and Troncoso, 2008). The distribution
of sediments in the Ensenada de Baiona
is, in turn, conditioned by patterns of
local hydrodynamism (Alejo and
Vilas, 1987; Alejo et al., 1999). Indeed,
hydrodynamism is regarded as the
'superparameter' acting as a source of
disturbance for benthos at large scales
(Brey, 1991); this superparameter affects
other abiotic factors which also have a
great influence on benthic assemblages,
such as granulometric composition and
availability of organic matter
(Mancinelli, Fazi and Rossi, 1998;
Elías, Palacios, Rivero and Vallar-
ino, 2005).
Sampling sites with a high content of
the gravel fraction (group of sites B)
have a gastropod fauna which is domi-
nated by epifaunal species such as
Caly-ptraea chinensis, trochids and
limpets (Patellidae, Fissurellidae). These
species can appear in numbers on sedi-
ments When stones or bioclastic compo-
nents such as dead shells of other mol-
luscs are present (Rueda and Salas,
2003); those constitute the "hard" sub-
strata in an otherwise soft bottom. Fur-
thermore, some of those species, namely
Gibbula cineraria and C. chinensis, were
also found in numbers in fine-sand sites
(group E, sites 17-18) because large
shells of both Lutraria spp. and venerid
bivalves were on the surface of the sedi-
ment. The gastropod assemblage from
coarser sandy sediments was numeri-
cally dominated by Caecum trachea. High
i
113
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Figure 5. nMDS ordination of sampling sites with valúes of some abiotic variables superimposed.
A, median grain size; B, very fine sand. Stress: 0.13.
Figura 5. Ordenación nMDS de los puntos de muestreo mostrando los valores de algunas variables
abióticas superimpuestas. A, mediana del tamaño de grano; B, arena muy fina. Estrés: 0, 13.
numbers of this species have also been
reported from similar sediments in the
Ría de Ares-Betanzos (Troncoso et al.,
2005) and the Ría de Aldán (Lourido et
al., 2006), this species being an impor-
tant component in terms of abundance
of the whole benthic assemblage. On the
other hand, Nassarius reticulatus was
found in a range of sediments, from
gravel to mud, being the dominant gas-
tropod in the fine-sand sediments. This
is a common species in subtidal fine
sediments in European Atlantic coasts
in general (Barroso, Moreira and
Richardson, 2005), and in the Galician
rias in particular (Olabarria, Tron-
coso and Urgorri, 1998; Troncoso et
al., 2005). This species migrates from
intertidal areas to subtidal areas in
autumn (Tallmark, 1980), which might
explain its wide distribution through
the inlet at the time of sampling, being
present both in shallow and deeper sed-
iments. Another abundant species in
médium- and fine-sand sediments was
the bullomorph Cylichnina umbilicata,
which has scarcely been reported in the
literature as a numerically dominant
species in gastropod assemblages. This
fact can be related to its small size
(about 4 mm) and the extended use of
sieving meshes greater than 500 jum,
which can lead to an understimation of
its abundance. In the Ensenada de
Baiona, this species appears mostly in
sandy sediments with a great content of
the medium-sand fraction while the
related species Retusa truncatula replaces
the former in muddier sandy sediments.
On the contrary, R. truncatula has fre-
quently been found in sandy sediments
in other rias, such as happens in the Ría
de Ferrol (Olabarria et al., 1998). The
other representative of the Bullomorpha
which has often been recorded from
sandy and muddy sediments in the
Galician rias is Cylichna cylindracea
(Garmendia et al., 1998; Lourido et
al., 2006). Nevertheless, in the Ensenada
de Baiona this species was not so abun-
dant as the other two aforementioned
species and was only found in some
sandy sites. Pyramidellidae was the
family best represented in number of
species at the Ensenada de Baiona. Nev-
ertheless, many of the species were
found in small numbers. Pyramidellids
are ectoparasites of many marine inver-
tebrates and tend to show specificity for
their hosts (Fretter and Graham,
1949). On soft-bottoms, polychaetes and
bivalves are common hosts. The most
abundant species at the Ensenada de
Baiona was Chrysallida terebellum, which
appeared in fine-sand sites and in
muddy sand. At those sites, 'sedentary'
polychaetes were abundant (Moreira et
al., 2006) which might favour the pres-
ence of C. terebellum in numbers there.
The smallest valúes for number of
species and diversity were found at
several shallow fine-sand sites cióse to
1 14
Moreira ET AL. : Spatial distribution of gastropods on subtidal sedimentary substraía
sandy beaches and at muddy sediments
around the harbour of Baiona. In the
first case, those sites are subjected to
strong hydrodynamism all the year
round, and particularly during winter
(pers. obs.) This hydrodynamism might
create an unstable sedimentary environ-
ment which is limitant for the establish-
ment or many species, therefore result-
ing in poor gastropod assemblages
(Netto, Attrill and Warwick, 1999).
This pattern has also been detected for
polychaetes and peracarid crustaceans
in the same sampling sites (Moreira et
al., 2006, 2008). On the other hand, sedi-
ments around the harbour of Baiona
have turned from sandy to muddy in
the last years and now support a poor
gastropod assemblage, mostly at sites 16
and 19. Thus, Alejo and Vilas (1987)
reported a dominance of the fine and
very fine sand fractions in the sediment
composition during the 1980's whereas
we found percentages of silt-clay
ranging from 74-90% in 1995. This
increase in content of silt-clay might be
due to the construction of the jetty
which provides shelter against oceanic
swell for the Baiona harbour. The pres-
ence of that jetty has indeed altered the
hydrodynamic conditions in this area
(Alejo and Vilas, 1987), thus allowing
a greater rate of sedimentation of finer
particles on the sheltered areas of the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alejo I., Austin W. E. N., Francés G. and Vi-
las F. 1999. Preliminary investigations of the
recent Foraminifera of Baiona Bay, N.W.
Spain. Journal of Coastal Research, 15: 413-427.
Alejo I. and Vilas F. 1987. Dinámica litoral y
evolución histórica de la Ensenada de Ba-
yona (Pontevedra). Thalassas, 5: 21-32.
Barroso C.M., Moreira M.H. and Richard-
son C.A. 2005. Age and growth of Nassarius
reticulatus in the Ria de Aveiro, north-west
Portugal. Journal ofthe Marine Biológica l As-
sociation ofthe U. K., 85: 151-156.
Boening D.W. 1999. An evaluation of bivalves
as biomonitors of heavy metáis pollution in
marine waters. Environmental Monitoring and
Assessment, 55: 459-470.
harbour. Although the quantitative data
on the benthic fauna inhabiting those
sediments previous to the construction
of the jetty are not available, it can be
suspected that this change in sedimen-
tary composition has led to an impover-
ishment in the composition of the
benthic assemblage as a whole, includ-
ing its gastropod fauna. These and other
similar alterations are frequent nowa-
days in Coastal areas because of the
increase of the human population living
on the coast (Chapman, 2006); this
usually translates into a loss of local bio-
diversity and changes in the species
composition of the assemblage. To
prevent this, taking some simple mea-
sures such as building channels under
breakwaters and jetties may improve
hydrodynamic conditions (Guerra-
García and García-Gómez, 2004) and
therefore prevent sedimentation in great
quantities of both finer particles and
organic matter.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors want to express their
gratitude to F. J. Cristobo, C. Olabarria
and P. Reboreda for their help during
field work and to J. García-Carracedo
who kindly revised the English versión
of the manuscript.
Brey T. 1991. The relative significance of bio-
logical and physical disturbance: an example
from intertidal and subtidal sandy bottom
communities. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci-
ence, 33: 339-360.
Cacabelos E., Quintas P. and Troncoso J.S.
2008. Spatial distribution of soft-bottom
molluscs in the Ensenada de San Simón (NW
Spain). American Malacological Bulletin, 25: 9-
19.
Castellanos C, Hernández-Vega S. and Ju-
noy J. 2003. Cambios bentónicos en la ría de
Foz (Lugo) (noroeste de España) tras la cons-
trucción de un espigón. Boletín del Instituto Es-
pañol de Oceanografía, 19: 205-217.
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Chapman M.G. 2006. Intertidal seawalls as ha-
bitat for molluscs. Journal ofMolluscan Studies,
72: 247-257.
Clarke K.R. and Gorley R.N. 2006. PRIMER
V6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltdv Ply-
mouth, U.K.
Denadai M.R. and Amaral A.C.Z. 1999. A
comparative study of intertidal molluscan
communities in sandy beaches, Sao Sebastiao
Channel, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Bulletin of
Marine Science, 65: 91-103.
Elías R., Palacios J.R., Rivero M.S. and Va-
llarino E.A. 2005. Short-term responses to
sewage discharge and storms of subtidal
sand-bottom macrozoobenthic assemblages
off Mar del Plata City, Argentina (SW Atlan-
tic). Journal ofSea Research, 53: 231-242.
Field J.G., Clarke K.R. and Warwick R.M.
1982. A practical strategy for analysing mul-
tispecies distribution patterns. Marine Ecol-
ogy Progress Series, 8: 37-52.
Fretter V. and Graham A. 1949. The structure
and mode of life of the Pyramidellidae, par-
asitic opisthobranchs. Journal ofthe Marine Bi-
ological Association ofthe U. K., 28: 493-532.
Garmendia J.M., Sánchez-Mata A. and
Mora J. 1998. Inventario de la macrofauna
bentónica de sustratos blandos submareales
de la Ría de Ares y Betanzos (NO de la
Península Ibérica). Nova Acta Científica
Compostelana (Bioloxía), 8: 209-231.
Gray J.S. 1981. The ecology of marine sediments.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Guerra-García J.M. and García-Gómez J.C.
2004. Soft bottom mollusc assemblages and
pollution in a harbour with two opposing en-
trances. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 60:
273-283.
Hidalgo J.G. 1886. Catálogo délos moluscos
recogidos en Bayona de Galicia y lista de las
especies marinas que viven en la costa no-
roeste de España. Revista del Progreso de Cien-
cias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 21(7): 373-
414.
Junoy J. and Viéitez J.M. 1989. Cartografía de
los sedimentos superficiales de la Ría de Foz
(Lugo). Thalassas, 7: 9-19.
López-Jamar E. 1978. Primeros datos sobre la
biomasa y la composición del bentos infau-
nal de la ría de Pontevedra, en relación con
el contenido en materia orgánica del sedi-
mento. Boletín del Instituto Español de Ocea-
nografía, 4: 57-69.
López-Jamar E. 1981. Spatial distribution of
the infaunal benthic communities of the Ría
de Muros, North-West Spain. Marine Biol-
ogy, 63: 29-37.
López-Jamar E., González G. and Mejuto J.
1986. Temporal changes of community struc-
ture and biomass in two subtidal macroin-
faunal assemblages in La Coruña bay, NW
Spain. Hydrobiologia, 142: 137-150.
López-Jamar E. and Mejuto J. 1985. Bentos in-
faunal en la zona submareal de la ría de La
Coruña. I. Estructura y distribución espacial
de las comunidades. Boletín del Instituto Es-
pañol de Oceanografía, 2(3): 99-109.
Lourido A., Gestoso L. and Troncoso J.S.
2006. Assemblages of the molluscan fauna
in subtidal soft bottoms of the Ría de
Aldán (north-western Spain). Journal of the
Marine Biological Association of the U. K., 86:
129-140.
MacAndrew R. 1849. On the Mollusca of Vigo
Bay in the Northwest of Spain. Annals and
Magazine of Natural History, 2(3): 507-513.
Mancinelli G. Fazi S. and Rossi L. 1998. Se-
diment structural properties mediating do-
minant feeding types patterns in soft-bot-
tom macrobenthos of the Northern Adriatic
Sea. Hydrobiologia, 367: 211-222.
Martínez J. and Ad arraga 1. 2003. Estructura
y evolución temporal de los sedimentos y
de las comunidades bentónicas afectadas por
los vertidos de un colector de aguas resi-
duales en San Sebastián (Guipúzcoa) (golfo
de Vizcaya). Boletín del Instituto Español de Oce-
anografía, 19: 345-370.
Mora J. 1982. Consideraciones generales sobre
la macrofauna bentónica de la Ría de Arosa.
Oecologia aquatica, 6: 41-49.
Moreira J., Quintas P. and Troncoso J.S.
2005. Distribution of the molluscan fauna in
subtidal soft bottoms of the Ensenada de
Baiona (NW Spain). American Malacological
Bulletin, 20: 75-86.
Moreira J., Quintas P. and Troncoso J.S.
2006. Spatial distribution of soft-bottom
polychaete annelids in the Ensenada de
Baiona (Ría de Vigo, Galicia, north-west
Spain). Scientia Marina, 70 (Supl. 3): 217-224.
Moreira J., Lourido A. and Troncoso J.S.
2008. Diversity and distribution of peracarid
crustaceans in shallow subtidal soft bottoms
at the Ensenada de Baiona (Galicia, N.W.
Spain). Crustaceana, 81: 1069-1089.
Netto S.A., Attrill M.J. and Warwick R.M.
1999. The effect of a natural water-move-
ment related disturbance on the structure
of meiofauna and macrofauna communi-
ties in the intertidal sand fíat of Rocas Atoll
(NE, Brazil). Journal ofSea Research, 42: 291-
302.
Olabarria C., Urgorri V. and Troncoso J.S.
1998. An analysis of the community structure
of subtidal and intertidal benthic mollusks of
the Inlet of Baño (Ría de Ferrol) (northwestem
Spain). American Malacological Bulletin, 14:
103-120.
Rolán E. 1983. Moluscos de la Ría de Vigo I.
Gasterópodos. Thalassas, anexo 1: 1-383.
Rolán E., Otero J. and Rolán-Álvarez E.
1989. Moluscos de la Ría de Vigo II. Thalas-
sas, anexo 2: 1-276.
lió
Moreira ET AL.: Spatial distribution of gastropods on sub tidal sedimentary substraía
Rueda J.L., Fernández-Casado M., Salas C.
and Gofas S. 2001. Seasonality in a
taxocoenosis of molluscs from soft bottoms
in the Bay of Cádiz (southern Spain). Journal
ofthe Marine Biological Association ofthe U. K.,
81:903-912.
Rueda J. and Salas C. 2003. Temporal dy-
namics of molluscan assemblages from soft
and bioclastic bottoms in the Strait of
Gibraltar. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 44:
237-248.
Stubblefield W.L., Permenter R.W. and Swift
D.J.P. 1977. Time and space variation in the
surficial sediments of the New York Bight
apex. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 5: 597-
607.
Tallmark B. 1980. Population dynamics of
Nassarius reticulatus (Gastropoda, Proso-
branchia) in Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. Marine
Ecology Progress Series, 3: 51-62.
Troncoso J.S., Moreira J. and Urgorri V.
2005. Soft-bottom mollusc assemblages in
the Ría de Ares-Betanzos (Galicia, NW Spain).
Iberus, 23: 25-38.
Troncoso J.S., Parapar J. and Urgorri V.
1993. Cartografía de los moluscos
infralitorales de sustratos blandosde la ría de
Ares y Betanzos (Galicia, NO de España).
Publicaciones Especiales del Instituto Español
de Oceanografía, 11: 131-137.
Troncoso J.S. and Urgorri V. 1993. Datos
sedimentológicos y macrofauna de los fondos
infralitorales de sustrato blando de la Ría de
Ares y Betanzos. Nova Acta Científica
Compostelana (Bioloxía), 4: 153-166.
Underwood A.J. 1992. Beyond BACI: the de-
tection of environmental impacts on popu-
lations in the real, but variable world. Jour-
nal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,
161: 145-178.
Wildish D.J. 1977. Factors controlling marine
and estuarine sublittoral macrofauna. Hel-
golander wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchun-
gen, 30: 445-454.
Wilson, W. H. 1991. Competí tion and preda-
tion in marine soft-sediment communities.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21:
221-241.
117
■
Iberas, 27 (1): 119-129, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
A new Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) from the
Algarve, south coast of Portugal
Una nueva especie de Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) del
Algarve, costa sur de Portugal
Roland HADORN*, Carlos M. L. AFON SO*' and Emilio ROLAN***
Recibido el 30-XI-2008. Aceptado el 8-P/-2009
ABSTRACT
Fusinus albacarinoides sp. nov. ¡s described from soufh Portugal, off the Algarve coast, ¡n
14-22 m depth. It ¡s characterized by having a small red-brown to dark brown shell orna-
mented with a conspicuous white band at the periphery, with a rough shell surface, an
elongate slender spire and a short siphonal canal. The new species is distinguished by ¡ts
shell morphology and the soft parts from all other eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Fusi-
nus and ¡s compared to a few of them.
RESUMEN
Se describe Fusinus albacarinoides sp. nov. del sur de Portugal, frente a la costa del
Algarve, a 14-22 m de profundidad. Se caracteriza por una concha pequeña, pardo
rojiza a pardo oscura, con una conspicua banda blanca en el borde, superficie rugosa,
espira delgada y alargada y canal sifonal corto. Se distingue de otras especies de Fusi-
nus del Atlántico este y Mediterráneo por la morfología de la concha y sus partes blan-
das. La especie es comparada con otras del género.
INTRODUCTION
Marine diversity is currently one of
the most studied topics in ecology, espe-
cially within the framework of global and
regional changes due to environmental
and human impacts. The importance of
well known benthic faunas for specific
study areas or geographical regions is the
first and most important step towards
proper characterization and manage-
ment. Within the Algarve región in south
Portugal, very few studies dealing with
marine molluscs associated with perma-
nently submerged rocky ecosystems have
been carried out up until now. To fulfill
this gap and contribute to the mapping of
marine biotopes a baseline study was
carried out (RENSUB II project) by the
Centre of Marine Sciences of the Algarve
(GONgALVES ET AL., 2007).
Between May 2003 and April 2006
more then 90 different stations in the
Central Algarve región were studied
seasonally. With the use of scuba diving
gear mollusc samples were recovered
from these stations and after proper
observation we found a well-defined
* Schützenweg 1, CH-3373 Rothenbach, Switzerland. susuf@bluewin.ch
** Centro de Ciencias do Mar - CCMAR/CIMAR. Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas 8005-139
Faro, Portugal, cmlafonso@ualg.pt
*** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus universitario Sur, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. ero-
lan@emiliorolan.com
119
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Fusinus species which does not match
the description of any other known
Fusinus species reported for the Atlantic
and Mediterranean Sea.
Details of shell and radular mor-
phology as well as animal soft parts are
presented and the new species is com-
pared to related known taxa.
Abbreviations
ANSP: Academy of Natural Sciences of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
CCMLA: Collection Carlos M. L.
Afonso, Faro, Portugal
CER: Collection Emilio Rolán, Vigo,
Spain
CRH: Collection Roland Hadorn,
Rothenbach, Switzerland
IPM: Instituto Portugués de Malacolo-
gia, Zoomarine, Guia, Portugal
lv: live collected
MNCN: Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales de Madrid, Spain
MNHN: Muséum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, París, France
SYSTEM ATICS
Family Fasciolariidae Gray, 1853
Genus Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815
Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815: 145. Substitute ñame for 'Fusus Lamarck 1799' [=Fusus Bruguiére,
1789], non Fusus Helbling, 1779.
Type species: Murex colus Linnaeus, 1758, by typification of replaced ñame.
Fusinus albacarinoides sp. nov. (Figs. 1-12)
Type material: Holotype (18.5 x 8.1 mm, lv) MNHN 21130, south Portugal, Algarve, Baía de Pera,
2 km offshore Arma^áo de Pera, 37° 04' 47.1 N, 8o 21' 41.8 W, 17-20 m deep, collected by Carlos M.
L. Afonso in March 2006. Paratype 1 (20.6 x 8.2 mm, lv) IPM.014T, same data; paratype 2 (18.5 x 7.6
mm, lv) MNCN 15.05/47.562, same data; paratype 3 (19.2 x 7.5 mm, lv) ANSP, same data; paratype
4 (21.1 x 8.2 mm, lv) CCMLA, same data; paratype 5 (17.9 x 7.2 mm, lv) CCMLA, same data; paratype
6 (21.3 x 9.3 mm, lv) CRH, same data; paratype 7 (20.7 x 8.0 mm, lv) CRH, same data; paratype 8
(17.3 x 6.8 mm, lv) CER, same data.
Other material examined: 5 additional specimens collected from the type locality. Numerous live
taken specimens from following stations: Pedra do Alto, 2.7 km off Oura (37° 03' 29.2 N, 8o 12' 34.7
W); Galé Alta, 2.3 km off Galé (37° 04' 09.3 N, 8o 19' 52.1 W), 17-19 m deep; Pedra Perdida, 2.4 km
offshore between Galé and Armagáo de Péra (37° 03' 26.2 N, 8o 19' 35.1 W), 20 m deep; Valados
Este, 3.7 km offshore between Galé and Armagáo de Péra (37° 02' 19.3 N, 8o 19' 18.3 W), 20-22 m
deep; Estragad, 1.6 km offshore Galé (37° 03' 29.8 N, 8o 18' 14.6 W), 20-22 m deep; Péra, 2.4 km off-
shore between Galé and Armaqáo de Péra (37° 04' 47.1 N, 8o 18' 14.6 W), 17-19 m deep; Lastro, 1.6
km offshore Marinha (37° 04' 37.2 N, 8o 24' 27.9 W), 14-16 m deep.
Type locality: Baía de Péra, 2 km offshore Armagáo de Péra (37° 04' 47.1 N, 8o 21' 41.8 W), Algarve,
south Portugal.
Etymology: Fusinus albacarinoides sp. nov. is derived from albus (Latin, adj.) meaning "white" in
combination with carina (Latin, noun, fem.), a keel. The white peripherical band along the shell
recalls the white foaming water of the wake behind a moving ship.
Description : Shell small for genus (up
to 22 mm in length), fusiform, thin, light-
weight, with long pointed spire and short
siphonal canal, consisting of 8 strongly
convex whorls (including protoconch)
Surface of the shell roughened by numer-
ous thin growth striae making the spiral
cords nearly granular, often forming fíne
scales or lamellae Crossing the spiral
sculpture between interspaces of axial
ribs on latter whorls. Suture constricted,
slightly wavy according to the axial
sculpture. Below suture often with a con-
spicuous band of well-visible scales
formed by growth striae. Shell red-brown
to dark brown with a conspicuous broad
120
Hadorn ET AL.: A new Fusinus from the Algarve, south coast of Portugal
Figures 1-9. Fusinus albacarinoides spec. nov., south Portugal, Algarve coast, off Arma^ao de Pera,
about 3 miles offshore. 1, 2: holotype MNHN 21130, 18.3 mm; 3, 4: paratype 2 MNCN
15.03/47.362, 18.5 mm; 5, 6: shell, CCMLA, colour variant, 21.3 mm; 7: protoconch (slightly
eroded); 8: operculum; 9: radula (7-9 from a specimen of 19.4 mm).
Figuras 1-9. Fusinus albacarinoides spec. nov., sur de Portugal, costa del Algarve, cerca de 3 millas
frente a Armagao de Pera. 1, 2: holotipo MNHN 21130, 18.5 mm; 3, 4: paratipo 2 MNCN
15.05/47.562, 18,5 mm; 5, 6: concha, CCMLA, variante de color, 21,3 mm; 7: protoconcha (algo
erosionada); 8: opérculo; 9: rádula (7-9 de un ejemplar de 19,4 mm).
121
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
white or yellowish band at periphery and
usually with an indistinct second white
or light brown band on parietal wall
which is only visible on body whorl.
Protoconch paucispiral, bulbous,
light brown, consisting of 1 ? smooth
glossy whorls, final part with 1-2 fine
axial riblets reaching from suture to
suture, transition to teleoconch abrupt,
marked by a varix. Diameter 0.8-0.9 mm.
Axial sculpture consisting of broad,
rather weak axial ribs reaching from
suture to suture on all postnuclear
whorls. Interspaces between axial ribs
rather broad, only slightly impressed. 8
or 9 axial ribs on upper whorls, 8-10 on
antepenultimate, 8-11 on penultimate
and 8-13 on body whorl.
Spiral sculpture usually darker than
the background colour, consisting of
broad coarse spiral cords with rough sur-
face caused by numerous thin growth
striae. Teleoconch beginning with 3 or 4
primary spiral cords, 4 on second whorl,
5 on third whorl, 6 on fourth, and 7 on
latter whorls. Spiral cords 3 and 4, count-
ed from the lower suture, are always the
strongest and white coloured (occasional-
ly yellowish or light brown). Secondary
spiral cords appear between the primary
cords from third or fourth whorl on, at
the beginning fine and inconspicuous but
occasionally becoming nearly as strong
as the primary cords on body whorl.
About 20-22 strong spiral cords behind
the outer lip, becoming weaker towards
the tip of the siphonal canal.
Aperture ovate, rounded above,
slightly constricted below, posterior
canal inconspicuous. Juvenile or
subadult specimens with a thin trans-
parent body whorl showing colouration
of the outer side of the shell. Adult spec-
imens white inside aperture, orna-
mented with 8-10 sharp but fine folds
forming tiny usually white teeth on
outer lip. Outer lip convex, edge finely
crenulated. Parietal callus thin, white or
transparent, glossy, adherent, not
detached from the parietal wall. Under-
lying spiral sculpture sometimes still
visible. No columellar folds.
Siphonal canal usually slightly
shorter than aperture length, straight or
slightly curved, widely open.
Operculum (Fig. 8) corneous, thin,
yellowish, shape and size corresponding
to aperture, nucleus apical.
Radula (Fig. 9) with tricuspid, elon-
gate, almost triangúlate central tooth.
Base rather narrow, top pointed, both
sides slightly concave. Cusps rather
small, pointed, slightly projecting below
the base, central one slightly stronger and
longer. Lateral teeth elongate, slightly
curved, with 9-10 rather short pointed
cusps with incurved tips. Two innermost
cusps longest and most prominent. At
inner end with a small denticle.
Anatomy : Animal (Figs. 11, 12) bright
red and irregularly speckled with white
spots of different sizes, scattered all over
the body including tentacles. Siphon
also spotted, paler in colour. Tentacles
(Right page) Figures 10-12. Fusinus albacarinoides spec. nov., south Portugal, Algarve coast, off
Arma9ao de Pera, about 3 miles offshore. 10: animal (drawing by Emilio Rolán), 19.4 mm; 11:
living animal; 12: detail of the tentacles (photographs by Carlos M. L. Alonso). Figures 13-18.
Fusinus cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008 ( =Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901), North Morocco, Bay of
Tangier. 13, 14: lectotype of Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6492, 28.1 mm; 15, 16:
paralectotype of Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6490, 26.5 mm; 17, 18: paralectotype
of Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6490, 25.0 mm.
(Página derecha) Figuras 10-12. Fusinus albacarinoides spec. nov., sur de Portugal, costa del Algarve,
cerca de 3 millas frente a Armado de Pera. 10: animal (dibujo de Emilio Rolán), 19,4 mm; 1 1:
animal vivo; 12: detalle de los tentáculos (fotografías de Carlos M. L. Afonso). Figuras 13-18.
Fusinus cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008 (C Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901), norte de Marruecos,
bahía de Tánger. 13, 14: lectotipo de Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6492, 28,1 mm; 15,
16: paralectotipo de Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6490, 26,5 mm; 17, 18: paralectotipo
de Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901, MNHN Molí 6490, 25,0 mm.
122
Hadorn ET AL.: A new Fusinus from the Algarve, south coast of Portugal
123
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
long, broader at their base, tapering,
each with a small black eye at end of
broad part (after one third of length of
tentacle). Extreme part of mantle has
some angular brown Unes which must
correspond to the darker parts of the
shell. Penis (Fig. 10) large, distinctive,
rather slender and fíat in the first half of
its length and then, on the second half of
its length, suddenly becoming conspicu-
ously slender with a pointed tip,
without a penial appendage.
Range and habitat: Known from
Southern Portugal, off the Algarve coast,
between Oura (37° 03' 29.2 N, 8o 12' 34.7
W) and Marinha (37° 04' 37.2 N, 8o 24'
27.9 W) between 1.6 and 4.0 km off-
shore. Not found in shallow water,
bathymetric range starts from 14-22 m
down, mostly collected attached under
rocks lying on rock platforms with fine
sandy bottom. The new species is
always associated with rocky bottoms.
Discussion: Only few other Fusinus
species are reported from the infralit-
toral zone of Southern Portugal, Algarve
coast: F. pulchellus (Philippi, 1844), F. ros-
tratus (Olivi, 1792) and F. syracusanus
(Linnaeus, 1758). However, the occur-
rence of F. syracusanus in the Atlantic
cannot be confirmed despite intensive
research along the Algarve coast.
Some other Fusinus species from the
eastern Atlantic and the Canary Islands
are similar in shape and sculpture and
therefore also compared to F. albacari-
noides sp. nov..
Hadorn and Rolán (1999)
redescribed Fusinus crassus (Pallary,
1901) and selected a lectotype, among
several syntype lots housed in MNHN,
originating from Tangier, on the Atlantic
coast of north Morocco. Buzzurro and
Russo (2007: 184-186) described and
well figured F. crassus (Pallary, 1901)
from a population from the Mediter-
ranean, Southern Spain, and noticed that
the ñame established by Pallary is a
primary homonym and could not be
used. Therefore F. cretellai Buzzurro and
Russo, 2008 was established for this
species as a replacement ñame for Fusus
crassus Pallary, 1901, which is a júnior
homonym of Fusus crassus Brown, 1827
(a recent Turrid from Scotland).
F. cretellai is most similar to F. albacari-
noides sp. nov.. F. cretellai is known from
two populations (Table I): originally
described from the Atlantic coast of
North Morocco, Tangier (type locality),
and the other one from Southern Spain
(from the Mediterranean, from Fuen-
girola, Algeciras and Getares and from
the Atlantic coast from Cape Trafalgar). F.
cretellai from north Morocco (Figs. 13-18)
differs from specimens from Southern
Spain (Figs. 19-22) by the somewhat
larger shell size (Morocco: up to 28.0 mm
(Right page) Figures 19-22. Fusinus cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008. 19, 20: shell, CRH, south
Spain, Mediterranean Sea, Getares, 23.4 mm; 21, 22: shell, CRH, south Spain, off Cape Trafalgar,
Cádiz, 19.3 mm. Figures 23, 24. Fusinus tenerifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999; paratype 5 CRH,
Canary Islands, Tenerife, 21.7 mm. Figures 23-28. Fusinus pulchellus (Philippi, 1844). 23, 26:
shell, CRH, Southern France, Cote d Azur, Saint-Raphaél Le Dramont, 15.0 mm; 27, 28: shell,
CCMLA, morphotype “quandumpulchellus“, south Portugal, Algarve, Lagos, off Ponta da
Piedade, 40-55 m deep, 28.9 mm. Figures 29, 30. Fusinus rostratus (Olivi, 1792), shell, CCMLA,
south Portugal, Algarve, Lagos, off Ponta da Piedade, 40-55 m deep, 34.6 mm.
(Página derecha) Figuras 19-22. Fusinus cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008. 19, 20: concha, CRH,
sur de España, Mediterráneo, Getares, 23,4 mm; 21, 22: concha, CRH, sur de España, frente al cabo
de Trafalgar, Cádiz, 19,3 mm. Figuras 23, 24. Fusinus tenerifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999;
paratipo 5 CRH, Islas Canarias, Tenerife, 21,7 mm. Figuras 25-28. Fusinus pulchellus (Philippi,
1844). 25, 26: concha, CRH, sur de Francia, Cote dAzur, Saint-Raphaél Le Dramont, 15,0 mm; 27,
28: concha, CCMLA, morfotipo “quandumpulchellus ", sur de Portugal, Algarve, Lagos, frente a Ponta
da Piedade, profundidad 40-55 m, 28,9 mm. Figuras 29, 30. Fusinus rostratus (Olivi, 1792),
concha, CCMLA, sur de Portugal, Algarve, Lagos, frente a Ponta da Piedade, profundidad 40-55 m,
34,6 mm.
124
Hadorn ET AL.: A new Fusinus from the Algarve, south coast of Portugal
125
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Table I. Conchometrical parameters of F. cretellai and F. albacarinoides
Tabla I. Parámetros conquiológicos de F. cretellai y F. albacarinoides
No. Height (H) mm Diameter (D) mm RatioH/D Remarks
F cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008 (= Fusus crassus Pallary, 1901), from North Morocco, Bay of Tangier (type locality) (lecto-
type and paralectotypes MNHN)
F. cretellai Buzzurro and Russo, 2008 from Southern Spain (as F. crassus q fter Buzzurro and Russo, 2007: 203)
126
HADORN ET AL. : A new Fusinus from the Algarve, south coast of Portugal
/ Southern Spain: up to 24.0 mm), the
comparatively broader shell (ratio
length/diameter: Morocco: 2.37 / South-
ern Spain: 2.63), the shorter spire, the
thicker shell, the inflated body whorl, the
predominant and deeper incised spiral
sculpture on body whorl, the more close-
set axial ribs with narrow and shallow
interspaces, the larger number of axial
ribs on body whorl, the entirely white
aperture, the strong internal lirae, and the
broader, stout siphonal canal with 3-4
conspicuously strong and broad, widely
spaced white spiral cords on outer side of
siphonal canal.
But the differences between the two
populations are not consistent and
linking specimens exists (e.g. Buzzurro
and Russo, 2007: pl. 26, fig. e). As long
as fresh material of F. cretellai from
North Morocco with intact protoconch
and soft parts is not available for study,
we prefer not to describe the Southern
Spain population as a distinct species.
F. cretellai (Figs. 13-18) from North
Morocco, Tangier (type locality), differs
from F. albacarinoides sp. nov. by the
larger shell size (20-28 mm), the thicker
and more solid shell, the smoother
surface, the shorter spire, the less con-
stricted suture, the less prominent but
more close-set axial ribs, the longer and
stronger siphonal canal, the prominent
but less numerous spiral cords on the
outer side of the siphonal canal, and by
the entirely white aperture and the thick
outer lip.
F. cretellai (Figs. 19-22) from Southern
Spain is most similar to F. albacarinoides
sp. nov., but differs by the lighter
coloured shell, the smaller protoconch
(diameter 0.7 mm instead of 0.8-0.9 mm),
the smoother surface, the weaker and less
prominent spiral sculpture especially at
periphery, and by the distinct white tooth
near the posterior canal. The radula is
very similar and not distinctive, but the
animal differs considerably. The animal
of F. cretellai is bright red in colour (Buz-
zurro and Russo, 2007: 185), but in F.
albacarinoides bright red with numerous
white speckles all over the animal includ-
ing tentacles and siphon. But most dis-
tinctive is the completely different penis
(different shape and with a short penial
appendage in F. cretellai). For details we
refer to Buzzurro and Russo, 2007: 185,
pl. 9, figs. d-e. Moreover, F. cretellai lives
under stones, generally with a reduced
weed cover, at depths of 2-5 m (Buzzurro
and Russo, 2007: 184); F. albacarinoides sp.
nov. lives in deeper water starting from
14-22 m down.
F. pulchellus (Philippi, 1844) (Figs. 25-
28) from the Mediterr anean Sea, lives at
depths of 2 to 120 meters, and was
recorded also from the Atlantic Ocean,
from Portugal and Atlantic coasts of
Spain and from the Canary Islands (Buz-
zurro and Russo, 2007: 148-149). The
second author obtained F. pulchellus from
the Algarve coast from local fishermen
collected in gilí and tangle nets, depth 35
m down and associated to muddy Bry-
ozoan bottoms of Adeonella calveti. We
compare F. albacarinoides sp. nov. to the
larger morphotype "quandumpulchel-
lus" figured by Snyder (2000: 174, figs
1A, IB). Buzzurro and Russo (2007: 149-
154) placed F. quandumpulchellus Snyder,
2000, in synonymy of F. pulchellus
(Philippi, 1844). F. pulchellus differs by the
smaller number but more prominent and
wider spaced axial ribs, the lighter
coloured shell, and the longer, straight
and more slender siphonal canal. The
animal of F. pulchellus differs by a distinc-
tive large, very stubby penis, triangular
in shape (Buzzurro and Russo, 2007:
150; pl. 4, figs. a-b).
F. rostratus (Olivi, 1792) (Figs. 29-30)
is distributed all over the Mediterranean
Sea, also the Atlantic coasts, namely
from Portugal to the Canary Islands,
also recorded from Moroccan coasts,
Spain, France and Mauritania (Buz-
zurro and Russo, 2007: 138). F. rostratus
often has a rough surface produced by
numerous thin axial growth striae,
forming fine scales and nearly granular
spiral cords, but differs by the larger
size (45-55 mm on the average), by the
distinct prominent axial sculpture, the
usually uniformly coloured shell, and
the long straight siphonal canal.
F. syracusanus (Linnaeus, 1758), an
infralittoral species distributed through-
out the Mediterranean Sea, also occurring
127
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
in the eastern Atlantic, from Portugal to
the Canary Islands (Buzzurro and Russo,
2007: 178), differs by the larger size, the
stout but light and broad shell, the cari-
nated, well-shouldered whorls, and the
distinct close-set, regularly spaced and
usually white coloured axial ribs.
F. tenerifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999
(Figs. 23-24) from the Canary Islands
(Tenerife and La Palma) is similar in
shape, sculpture and colouration, but
differs by the red brown protoconch, the
dark brown to chocolate-brown coloura-
tion, the more prominent and well-
spaced axial ribs, the dark brown, some-
times slightly purplish aperture, and
usually by the less conspicuous white
band, and the shorter siphonal canal.
Some other Fusinus species are
recorded from the Ibero-Moroccan Gulf,
from the Atlantic coasts of Portugal or
Morocco, but none of them is similar to
F. albacarinoides sp. nov.:
F. sectus (Locard, 1897), known only
from the holotype (figured in Hadorn
and Ryall, 1999: 34, figs. 1-2), collected
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to Koen Fraussen,
Belgium, for his kind support, helpful sug-
gestions and for making the plates, the
late Giovanni Buzzurro, Italy, and Pablo
Pedro Modroño de la Rosa, Spain, for pro-
viding comparison material. We thank also
Virginie Héros, Muséum National d'His-
toire Naturelle, Paris, France, for the loan
of type material. We would like to thank
our colleagues who took part in the
RENSUB II project (Underwater Visual
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Buzzurro G. and Russo P. 2007.
Mediterranean Fusinus. A revisión of the
Recent Mediterranean species of the genus
Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815 (Gastropoda:
Fasciolariidae). Grafiche ATA: Milano,
Italy. 280 pp., 30 pls.
Buzzurro G. and Russo P. 2008. A new re-
placement ñame for Fusus crassus Pallary,
1901. Tritón 17: 7.
from off Mauritania 882 m deep, differs
by the broader and shorter spire and the
uniformly coloured shell.
F. agadir ensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999,
from the Atlantic coast of Morocco, col-
lected between Agadir and Casablanca
50-70 m deep, differs by the smaller shell
size (up to 16.6 mm), the uniform light
brown shell, and the distinct regularly
spaced axial and spiral ribs.
F. boucheti Hadorn and Ryall, 1999,
from the Atlantic coast of Morocco and
the Canary Islands, collected 480-724 m
deep, differs by the larger shell size (up
to 45.8 mm), the larger protoconch (diam-
eter 1.3-1. 8 mm), the longer siphonal
canal, and the uniformly coloured shell.
F. bocagei bocagei (P. Fischer, 1882),
distributed from the Bay of Biscay to the
Ibero-Moroccan Gulf, the Azores and
the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, col-
lected 225-3215 m deep, differs by the
larger size (24-38 mm), the prominent
broad, well-spaced axial ribs, the simple
inconspicuous spiral sculpture, and the
uniformly coloured shell.
Census) namely J.M.S. Gongalves (coor-
dinator), P. Monteiro, R. Coelho, C.
Almeida, P. Veiga, F. Oliveira, J. Ribeiro,
D. Abecasis and L. Bentes. Funds for this
study were provided by the Algarve
Regional Administration (Comissáo de
Coordenado de Desenvolvimento
Regional do Algarve - CCDR Algarve).
SEM photographs made by Jesús Méndez
in CACTI (Centro de Apoyo Científico y
Tecnológico) of the University of Vigo.
Gon^alves J.M.S., Monteiro P., Coelho R.,
Afonso C., Almeida C., Veiga P., Machado
M., Machado D., Oliveira F., Ribeiro J.,
Abecasis D., Primo L., Tavares D.,
Fernández-Carvalho J., Abreu S., Fonseca
L., Erzini K. and Bentes L. 2007. Cartography
and characterization of the marine communities
off the National Underwater Ecological Reserve
between Galé and Ancáo. Universidade do
Algarve, CCMAR, Faro, 250 pp.
128
Hadorn ET AL.: A new Fusinus from the Algarve, south coast of Portugal
Hadorn R. and Rolán E. 1999. Two new
Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) from
northwest Africa and the Canary Islands,
including a brief description of the type
material of Fusinus crassus (Pallary, 1901).
Argonauta 13 (1): 39-47, figs. 1-21.
Hadorn R. and Ryall P.S. 1999. A
NEW SPECIES AND A NEW SUBS-
PECIES OF DEEP-WATER FUSINUS
(GASTROPODA: FASCIOLARIIDAE)
FROM THE EASTERN ATLANTIC.
ARGONAUTA 13 (1): 31-38, FIGS. 1-23.
Snyder M.A. 2000. Nomenclatural emenda-
tions in the family Fasciolariidae (Mollusca:
Gastropoda). Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 150: 173-179.
129
.
.
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus, 27 (1): 131-139, 2009
Two new species of Crassispira (Gastropoda, Conoidea)
from West Africa with a taxonomic note on Crassispira
tripter \ on Maltzan, 1883
Dos nuevas especies de Crassispira (Gastropoda, Conoidea) de África
occidental con una nota taxonómica sobre Crassisipira tripter von
Maltzan, 1883
Peter RYALL*, Juan HORRO** and Emilio ROLÁN***
Recibido el 14-1-2009. Aceptado el 8-IV-2009
ABSTRACT
A previous suggestion that Drillia tripter von Maltzan, 1 883 should be assigned to the
genus Crassispira Swainson, 1840 ¡s confirmed. Two new species of this genus are
described and ¡llustrated from West Africa and compared to other similar species from this
a rea.
RESUMEN
Se confirma la asignación de Drillia tripter von Maltzan, 1883 al género Crassispira
Swainson, 1 840, que había sido previamente sugerida. Se describen e ilustran dos nue-
vas especies de este género de África occidental, haciendo comparación con otras con-
genéricas.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Crassispira Swainson, 1840
from West Africa had been reviewed by
Fernandes, Rolán, and Otero-Schmitt
(1995), who identified ten species,
describing five as new and mentioning
yet another as undetermined. Rolán,
Ryall and Horro (2007) increased this
number with the description of a new
species endemic of south Angola and
commented that another known species
would probably be better placed in this
genus: Drillia tripter von Maltzan, 1883.
Studies of this species have now con-
firmed that it is a Crassispira.
The authors have also recently been
able to examine material collected from
two different localities in West Africa
that matches the characteristics of this
genus as outlined by Powell (1966). In
both cases the material was obtained by
scuba diving, a collecting method rela-
tively new to the región. This technique
has already led to other new species
being newly discovered in West Africa.
Specimen collection had previously
been limited to intertidal searching,
snorkel diving naturally limited to a
máximum depth of 15 meters, dredging
* St. Ulrich 16, 9161 María Rain, Austria; peteriyalll@hotmail.com
** Montero Ríos 30-3°, 36201 Vigo, Spain; juanhorro@telefonica.net
*** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; erolan@emi-
liorolan.com
131
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
in sandy areas or as a by-product from
fishermens' nets, trawls and traps. But
with the introduction of scuba diving,
some previously inaccessible areas can
now be studied and these deeper rocky
habitats are now revealing some species
new to Science.
The generic assignation of Drillia
tripter von Maltzan, 1883 and the descrip-
tion of two new species of Crassispira are
the subject of the present work.
MATERIAL
The material of the new species from
Senegal has been collected by Alex Tren-
cart and Jacques Pelorce by scuba diving
at 30-37 meters off Dakar, Senegal. That
from Sao Tomé Island has been collected
by Sandro Gori at 43 meters on small
rounded stones at Minerio Reef. It is to
be noted that at such depths "down
time" is severely limited to avoid
decompression stops on the diver's
ascent. We also studied the type mater-
ial from the Berlin Museum of Drillia
tripter von Maltzan, 1883 as well as
numerous specimens from the collec-
tions of Jacques Pelorce, Frank Boyer,
José María Hernández Otero and the
three authors,; all of this material is
from the Dakar area of Senegal.
Abbreviations:
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural "Luis
Iglesias" University of Santiago de
Compostela.
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid.
MNHN Muséum national d'Histoire
naturelle, París.
ZMB Zoologisches Museum, Berlin
CAT collection of Alex Trencart, París
CFB collection of Frank Boyer, Sevran
CHO collection of José María Hernán-
dez, Gran Canaria
CJH collection of Juan Horro, Vigo
CJP collection Jacques Pellorce, París
CPR collection of Peter Ryall, María
Rain
CSG collection Sandro Gori, Livorno
sp specimen with soft parts
s empty shell
j juvenile
LC length of the shell
DRlength of the radular tooth
SYSTEMATICS
Family Turridae Swainson, 1840
Subfamily Crassispirinae Morrison, 1966
Genus Crassispira Swainson, 1840
Type species (s. d.): Pleurotoma bottae Kiener, 1840
Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan, 1883) (Figs. 1-10)
Type material: Two series of syntypes, references ZMB/Moll-37221, 4 dried shells (Figs. 1-3) and
ZMB /Moll-1 12616, 2 dried shells (Fig. 4) this lot ex coll. Paetel (both leg. Von Maltzan).
Other material examined: 5 sp and 25 s. Cap Vert, Dakar (CJP); 5 sp from Dakar (MHNS); 3 sp, 5
s from Dakar (CHO); 19 s from Dakar (CFB).
Type locality: Gorée Island, Dakar, Senegal.
Description: Nolf (2008) has restated
the main features of this species and we
therefore refer readers to the original
description as well as to this recent
work for details of the shell. The shell is
illustrated in the present work (Figs 1-6)
It is necessary to add a description of
the protoconch (Figs. 7, 8) which is
rounded, smooth, shiny, brown with a
little more than one whorl, suture
marked and there is a clear transition
with the teleconch. As would be expec-
132
Ryall ET AL.: Two new species of Crassispira from West Africa
Figures 1-10. Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan, 1883), Gorée, Senegal; 1-3: syntypes, 23.0, 20.5 and
15.6 mm, (ZMB/Moll-37221); 4: syntype, 14.3 mm (ZMB/Moll-1 12616, ex coll. Paetel); 5-6:
shell, 14.2 mm(CHO); 7: protoconch of the syntype of fig. 4; 8: protoconch of a non-type shell
(CFB). 9: marginal tooth of the radula; 10: operculum, 4 mm, from a specimen 17.1 mm.
Figuras 1-10. Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan , 1883), Gorée, Senegal; 1-3: sintipos, 23,0, 20,5 y
15.6 mm, (ZMB/Moll-37221); 4: sintipo, 14,3 mm (ZMB/Moll-1 12616, ex coll. Paetel); 5-6:
concha, 14,2 mm(CHO); 7: protoconch a del sintipo fig. 4; 8: protoconcha de un ejemplar no tipo
(CFB). 9: diente marginal de la rádula; 10: opérenlo, 4 mm, de un ejemplar 17,1 mm.
133
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
ted with a species of direct development
its size is a little variable ranging from
700 mm tol mm in diameter.
Dimensions : The largest syntype is 23
mm (Fig. 1); máximum size observed
24.56 mm (CFB), usually between 15-19
mm.
Animal: We studied an alcohol pre-
served specimen. The head is dark
around the tentacles and in the base are
the eyes. On the right dorsal part is a
penis which is elongate and abruptly
terminated by a flat small surface where
a tiny appendix could be seen. The solé
of the foot is cream.
Operculum : (Fig. 10) Elongated,
almost straight, with a terminal nucleus.
Radula: (Fig. 9) Obtained from a
specimen with shell of 17.1 mm. It is
formed by two rows of marginal elon-
gate teeth which total 50 in number. The
tooth is sharp pointed with a small barb
less that one third of the total length; an
internal callous resembling a bone can
be seen at the centre. The tooth is rather
small (LC/DR= 142) and neither rachid-
ian ñor lateral teeth are present.
Distribution : Only known from the
Dakar area of Senegal although Nolf
(2008) mentions one specimen from
Ivory Coast ex "Atlantidae" expedition.
Remarks: This is a well known west
African species with many bibliographic
references. von Maltzan (1883, 119, pl.
3, fig. 1) described it as Drillia and this
generic placement was to be followed
by all subsequent authors to date. They
ineludes Tryon (1884: 208, pl. 30, fig.
80), Powell (1966) and Ardovini and
Cossignani (2004: 37, 220, 221).
Knudsen (1956) had some problems
with the species placement confusing
specimens from Gorée Bay with Drillia
ballista von Maltzan, 1883. Recently
Nolf (2008) has discussed this error and
separated clearly tripter and ballista
whilst again maintaining the generic
assignment in Drillia.
Powell (1966) noted some pertinent
radula differences between the genera
Drillia and Crassispira and we believe
that he did not have the possibility to
study the radula of tripter von Maltzan,
1883. He States that the genus Drillia
bear a minute unicuspid central tooth
with curved, comb-like lateral teeth
behind the marginal ones whilst the
genus Crassispira has only the marginal
teeth. We must therefore conclude that
the correct generic assignation for this
species must be in Crassispira and not in
Drillia.
Crassispira trencarti spec. nov. (Figs. 11-22)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 11-13), sp in MNHN (ex CAT). Paratypes from Petit Thiouriba, 30
m, basaltic rocks, Dakar, Senegal, in the following collections: 1 sp (Figs. 14, 15) in MNCN (ex CJP);
2 s (Figs. 16, 17) in CJP. All from the type locality; other paratype (Figs. 18, 19), 1 j (Fig. 20) in MHNS
from N'Gor, 14 m.
Type locality: Off N'Gor Island, Dakar, Senegal, 37 m.
Etymology: Named after Mr. Alex Trencart, Paris, who in recent years dived extensively in the
type locality and found the holotype.
Description: Shell (Figs. 11-20)
fusiform elongate and solid with a high
spire. Protoconch (Fig. 21) of a little more
than one smooth and shiny light brown
whorl with a diameter of about 700 pm.
Teleoconch of the holotype with 6 ?
whorls, which exhibit prominent axial
ribs that are a little opisthocline in shape,
which begin (except on the first two
whorls) below a subsutural depressed
area, fínishing on the lower suture; on the
last whorl the ribs fade below the periph-
ery. Last whorl represents 40% of the total
shell height, but in juvenile specimens
the ratio can reach 50%; spiral sculpture
of numerous small but prominent
threads which continué up to the base.
Aperture oval elongate, siphonal canal
short and wide. Background colouration
cream or light brown, with a narrow dark
band on the suture; below this are irreg-
ularly spaced isolated oblique lines; on
134
Ryall ET AL.: Two new species of Crassispira from West Africa
Figures 11-21. Crassispira trencarti spec. nov. 11-13: holotype, 11.6 mm (MNHN); 14, 13:
paratype, 7.8 mm (MNCN); 16, 17: paratype, 7.5 mm (CJP); 18, 19: paratype, 5.3 mm
(MHNS); 20: paratype, 5.1 mm (MHNS); 21: protoconch of the holotype; 22: operculum.
Figuras 11-21. Crassispira trencarti spec. nov. 11-13: holotipo, 11,6 mm (MNHN); 14, 15: paratipo,
7,8 mm (MNCN); 16, 17: paratipo, 7,5 mm (CJP); 18, 19: paratipo, 5,3 mm (MHNS); 20:
paratipo, 5,1 mm (MHNS); 21: protoconcha del holotipo; 22: opérenlo.
135
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
the last whorl there is a cream band
encompassing the widest part of the
shell, bordered below by irregular but
bold dark brown staining; the lower base
is lighter and flecked with lighter and
darker weak tubercules.
Dimensions : The holotype is 11.6 mm;
the paratypes are smaller.
Animal: Not studied.
Operculum : (Fig. 22) Elongated with
a terminal nucleus.
Distribution : Only known from the
immediate area of Dakar, Senegal.
Remarks: C. trencarti spec. nov. was
placed in the genus Crassispira because
of the shell' s general overall shape, the
fact that the operculum has a terminal
nucleus and it has cióse similarity to
Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan, 1883).
Many of the other West African species
are larger and wider and can easily be
separated from the present species by the
decollate spire. We comment on some simi-
larly sized species from the area as follows:
Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan,
1883) is the closest species at first glance,
however it is generally larger as already
indicated, reaching more than 20 mm; it
is also endemic to the area of Dakar and
bears an elongate operculum with a ter-
minal nucleus.
The protoconch of C. tripter is
brown / mauve, depressed, bearing more
numerous axial ribs on the teleconch
and final whorls; the ribs are bold from
the suture to the base and bend sharply
to the left just above their midpoint; in
the new species they only arise in a sub-
sutural channel and drop perpendicular
to the base. The general colour of the
latter can be from light brown to orange
to mauve /brown, often with some
darker pattern on a lighter background
just below the suture and again as a
narrow band at the top of the aperture,
below the widest part of the final whorl.
Crassispira laevisculcata (von Maltzan,
1883) is longer and narrower and lacks
spiral cords; colour is lighter.
Crassispira consociata (E.A. Smith, 1877)
is generally larger and decollate, lacking
any dark colouration, and juvenile speci-
mens exhibit a multispiral protoconch.
Crassispira sacerdotalis Rolán and Fer-
nandes, 1992 is narrower, of a uniform
colour and with an angular protoconch
(Rolán and Fernandes, 1992 fig. 4).
Crassispira pini Fernandes, Rolán and
Otero-Schmitt, 1996 is also endemic to the
Dakar area where it is found intertidally
under rocks. It is smoother, uniform dark-
brown in colour with weaker, more numer-
ous tubercles. Fernandes et al. (1995, fig.
28) illustrate a squat protoconch with
strong radial lirations already in the third
whorl which are quite different from our
species.
Crassispira fuscobrevis Rolán, Ryall
and Horro, 2007 can be of similar size
with an intact protoconch but is
endemic to south Angola, is stouter in
shape and possesses a strong subsutural
cord; the latter is generally uniform
dark brown, or a little lighter in the sub-
sutural area (i.e. the negative colour
aspect of the species just described).
Addendum: After the submission of this
paper, the authors obtained from Jacques
Pelorce additional material of Crassispira
trencarti spec. nov. and they were able to
study its radula which confirms the generic
atribution to Crassispira and the specific
separation from Crassispira tripter. Both
radular tooth are very similar, only dif-
ferent in the ratio, which in Crassispira tren-
carti has LC/DR = 133.
Crassispira sandrogorii spec. nov. (Figs. 23-31)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 23, 24) in MNHN. Paratypes (all shells) in the following collec-
tions: MHNS (1, Figs. 27, 28) ; CPR (1, Fig. 14); CJH (1); and 4 more in CSG (Fig. 25, 26). All from
the type locality.
Type locality: Minerio Reef, 00° 23' 016" N, 06° 46' 228" E, 43 m, on small rounded stones; Sao Tomé
Island, Gulf of Guinea.
Etymology: Named after Mr. Sandro Gori, Italian malacologist, who in a recent collecting trip dived
extensively in the type locality and collected all the material studied.
136
Ryall ET AL.: Two new species of Crassispira from West Africa
Figures 23-31. Crassispira sandrogorii spec. noy. 23, 24: holotype, 12.8 mm (MNHN); 23:
paratype, 10.9 mm (CSG); 26: paratype, 10.5 mm (CPR); 27, 28 paratype, 8.2 mm (MHNS); 29:
detail of the aperture, paratype (CSG); 30: detail of spire and protoconch, paratype (CSG); 31:
protoconch, same paratype as Figure 28.
Figures 23-31. Crassispira sandrogorii spec. nov. 23, 24: holotipo, 12,8 mm (MNHN); 25: paratipo,
10,9 mm (CSG); 26: paratipo, 10,5 mm(CPR); 27, 28 paratipo, 8,2 mm (MHNS); 29: detalle de la
abertura, paratipo (CSG); 30: detalle de la espira y protoconcha, paratipo (CSG); 31: protoconcha,
mismo paratipo que la Figura 28.
137
Iberus, 27 (1), 2009
Dimensions : The holotype is 12.8
mm, the paratypes are smaller.
Description: Shell (Figs. 23-28)
fusiform elongate, with a high spire,
solid, the whorls stepped. Protoconch
(Figs. 30, 31) of one and a half smooth
whorls, having a depressed nucleus and
a peripheral angulation; its diameter is
about 700 pm and the colour is light
brown. Teleoconch of the holotype with
6-7 whorls, which exhibit prominent,
wide and orthocline, or scarcely opistho-
cline, axial ribs, which (except on the first
teleoconch whorls) begin below a subsu-
tural depressed area, finishing on the
lower suture; they are wider than their
interspaces and on the last whorl fade
below the periphery. The last whorl rep-
resents 40% of the total height, but in
juveniles can reach 50% or more; spiral
sculpture formed by numerous and well
marked threads which continué up to the
base. Aperture (Figs. 23, 29) oval elon-
gate, with a prominent nodule on the
upper part of the columella; siphonal
canal short and wide, external lip fine
with a deep sinus on the upper part, and
strongly rounded anteriorly (Fig. 23).
Background colouration yellowish-cream
or light brown, with isolated dark narrow
oblique axial lines irregularly scattered
below the suture, and numerous dark
spots appearing on the spiral thread on
all the shell and down to the base.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Alex Trentcart
(Paris), Sandro Gori (Livorno), Jacques
Pelorce (Paris), Frank Boyer (Sevran)
and José María Hernández Otero
(Gáldar, Canaries) who are all amateur
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ardovini R. and Cossignani T. 2004. West
African Seashells. L 'lnformatore Piceno, An-
cona. 319 pp.
Fernandes F., Rolán E. and Otero-Schmitt
J. 1995. The genus Crassispira (Gastropoda,
Turridae) in West Africa. Journal ofConchol-
ogy, 35: 286-301.
Animal and operculum : Both are
unknown.
Distribution : Only known from the
type locality and we believe it is proba-
bly endemic to Sao Tomé Island or the
immediate island group.
Remarles: Although the specimens
examined have been collected without
animal we have placed it in the genus
Crassispira as the shape agrees well with
other species of this genus.
Crassispira sandrogorii spec. nov. can be
differentiated from all other West African
species by the very distinct angulate pro-
toconch. Only Crassispira sacerdotalis Rolán
and Fernandes, 1992, which is also
endemic to this island, has a similar pro-
toconch, but it is smaller, much shorter
and mauve/black as against honey brown
in our new species. The spire is shorter,
the axial nodules are weaker, the shell is
monochromatic dark brown and smaller
in size (8-10 mm)), the spire is much
shorter, the axial nodules are weaker, and
the shell is monochromatic mauve or black
against honey brown in our new species.
Our species has some resemblance to
C. trencarti spec. nov. in respect of the
randomly scattered dark pigmentations
but as mentioned the protoconch is
quite distinct, the shoulder is less
evident, the colour darker with spiral
bands, the spiral sculpture is finer and
has more numerous threads.
conchologists and have allowed us to
examine their material, and to Thomas
Von Rintelen from Berlin Museum, who
kindly sent us on loan the type material
of Crassispira tripter (von Maltzan, 1883).
Knudsen J. 1952. Marine Prosobranchs of
Tropical West Africa collected by the
"Atlantide" Expedition 1945-46. Part 1.
Videnskab elige Meddelelser fra Dansk
Naturhistorisk Forening I Kjobenhavn, 114:
129-185, pl. 13.
138
Ryall ET AL.\ Two new species of Crassispira from West Africa
Knudsen J. 1956. Remarks on a collection of
marine prosobranchs from Senegal. Bulletin
de l'Institut Frangaise d’ Afrique Noire, ser. A,
18: 514-529, pls. 1-2.
Maltzan H.E. von 1883. Beitraege zur Kent-
niss der senegambischen Pleuromiden. Jah-
resbuecher der Deutschen Malakozoologischen
Gesellschaft, 10: 116-136, pl. 3.
Nolf F. 2008. About the true identity of Drillia
ballista von Maltzan, 1883 and Drillia tripter,
von Maltzan, 1883 (Mollusca: Gastropoda:
Drilliidae) as well as their differences com-
pared to D. annielonae Nolf and Verstraeten,
2007. Neptúnea , 7 (2): 14-24.
Rolán E. and Fernandes F. 1992. Aportacio-
nes al conocimiento de la familia Turridae
Swainson,1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) en
las islas de Sao Tome y Príncipe (Golfo Gui-
nea). Nova Acta Científica Compostelana ( Bio -
loxía), 3: 135-143.
Rolán E., Ryall P. and Horro J. 2007. Two
new species of the genera Crassispira and
Agladrillia (Gastropods, Conoidea) from An-
gola. Neptúnea, 6 (3): 25-31.
Tryon G.W. 1884. Manual of Conchology , Struc-
tural and Systematic, with illustrations of the
Species. Vol. VI. Conidae, Pleurotomidae.
Tryon, Philadelphia, 413 pp., 34 pls.
139
' ■ fe 1
1
.
NORMAS DE PUBLICACION
• La revista Iberus publica artículos de fondo, notas y monografías que versen sobre cualquiera de los aspectos
relacionados con la Malacología. Se entiende por artículo un trabajo de investigación de más de 5 páginas de
texto, incluidas láminas, gráficos y tablas. Las notas son trabajos de menor extensión. Las monografías son tra-
bajos sobre un tema único, de extensión superior a las 50 páginas de la revista y que serán publicadas, si
procede, como un suplemento de Iberus. Los autores interesados en publicar monografías deberán ponerse
previamente en contacto con el Editor de Publicaciones. Se entiende que el contenido de los manuscritos no ha
sido publicado, ni enviado simultáneamente a otra revista para su consideración.
• Los manuscritos, así como toda la correspondencia relacionada con los mismos, deberán ser remitidos a:
Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de
Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España y /o al correo electrónico <sgofas@uma.es>.
• El texto del trabajo podrá estar redactado en español, inglés, italiano, francés o portugués.
• Los artículos, notas y monografías deberán presentarse sobre DIN A-4, por una sola cara a doble espacio
(incluyendo referencias, pies de figura y tablas), con al menos 3 centímetros de margen por cada lado. Los tra-
bajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias) y se incluirá una versión en un CD, o bien remitida
por correo electrónico, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones de corrientes de Windows (pero no
en el formato .docx de Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macintosh. En caso de autoría compartida,
uno de los autores deberá hacerse responsable de toda la correspondencia.
• Junto con el trabajo debe incluirse una lista de al menos 4 posibles revisores del mismo, sin perjuicio de los
que el propio Editor considere oportunos.
• Los manuscritos se presentarán de acuerdo al siguiente esquema:
Primera página. Deberá incluir un título conciso, pero sugerente del contenido del trabajo, así como una traduc-
ción al inglés del mismo (si el artículo no está escrito en inglés). Cuando sea preciso, deberá incluir referencia a
familia o taxones superiores. A continuación figurarán, por este orden, el nombre y apellidos completos del
autor o autores, las direcciones completas de los mismos, y un resumen del trabajo y su traducción al inglés.
Dicho resumen deberá sintetizar, en conjunción con el título, tanto los resultados como las conclusiones del
artículo; se sugiere una extensión de 100 a 200 palabras.
Páginas siguientes. Incluirán el resto del artículo, que debe dividirse en secciones precedidas por breves encabe-
zamientos. Siempre que sea posible, se recomienda seguir el siguiente esquema: Introducción, Material y
métodos. Resultados, Discusión, Conclusiones, Agradecimientos y Bibliografía. Si se emplean abreviaturas no
habituales en el texto, deberán indicarse tras el apartado de Material y Métodos.
• Las notas breves deberán presentarse de la misma forma, pero sin resumen.
• Deberán evitarse notas a pie de página y referencias cruzadas. Deberán respetarse estrictamente los Códigos
Internacionales de Nomenclatura Zoológica y Botánica (últimas ediciones). Cuando un taxón aparezca por
primera vez deberá citarse su autor y fecha de su descripción. En el caso de artículos sistemáticos, cuando se
den las sinonimias de los taxones, éstas deberán citarse COMPLETAS, incluyendo en forma abreviada la
publicación donde fueron descritas, y la localidad tipo si es conocida entre corchetes, según el siguiente
esquema (préstese especial cuidado a la puntuación):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Sinonimias
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Localidad tipo: Marsella].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
Dichas referencias no deberán incluirse en la lista de Bibliografía si es la única vez que se nombran en el texto.
Si se incluyen una lista completa de referencias de un taxón inmediatamente tras éste, deberá seguirse el
mismo esquema (sin incluir en Bibliografía las referencias que no se mencionen en otro lugar del texto).
• Sólo los nombres en latín y los de taxones genéricos y específicos deberán llevar subrayado sencillo o prefe-
rentemente ir en cursiva. En ningún caso deberá escribirse una palabra totalmente en letras mayúsculas, ni
siquiera el Título. Las unidades a utilizar deberán pertenecer al Sistema Métrico Decimal, junto con sus correc-
tas abreviaturas. En artículos escritos en castellano, en los números decimales sepárese la parte entera de la
decimal por una coma inferior (,), NUNCA por un punto (.) o coma superior (')■
• Las referencias bibliográficas irán en el texto con minúsculas o versalitas: Fretter y Graham (1962) o Fretter
y Graham (1962). Si son más de dos autores se deberán citar todos la primera vez que aparecen en el texto
[Smith, Jones y Brown (1970)] empleándose et al. las siguientes veces [Smith et al. (1970)]. Si un autor ha publi-
cado más de un trabajo en un año se citarán con letras: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). No deberá emplearse op.
cit. La lista de referencias deberá incluir todas las citas del texto y sólo éstas, ordenadas alfabéticamente. Se
citarán los nombres de todos los autores de cada referencia, sea cual sea su número. Los nombres de los
autores deberán escribirse, en letras minúsculas o Versalitas. No deberán incluirse referencias a autores
cuando éstos aparezcan en el texto exclusivamente como autoridades de un taxón. Los nombres de las publica-
dones periódicas deberán aparecer COMPLETOS, no abreviados. Cuando se citen libros, dése el título, editor,
lugar de publicación, n° de edición si no es la primera y número total de páginas. Deberán evitarse referencias
a Tesis Doctorales u otros documentos inéditos de difícil consulta. Síganse los siguientes ejemplos (préstese
atención a la puntuación):
Fretter V. y Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Trunca telloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. En Ponder, W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Las gráficas e ilustraciones deberán ser originales y presentarse preferentemente en formato electrónico al
formato de caja de la revista o proporcional a éste. Este formato es de 57 mm (una columna) o 121 mm (dos) de
anchura y hasta 196 mm de altura, si bien se recomienda utilizar el formato a dos columnas. Es importante que
todas las figuras sean remitidas en su formato original (por ejemplo, las fotografías en .jpg de alta calidad o .tif,
las gráficas en hojas de cálculo Excel o documentos de CorelDraw), puesto que las ilustraciones insertadas en
el manuscrito WORD son inservibles en la fase de imprenta. Las imágenes digitales deben ser formateadas en
su tamaño de impresión con una resolución mínima de 300 ppp para imágenes en color o escala de grises y de
600 ppp para las de blanco y negro. Considérese la reducción que será necesaria a la hora de decidir el tamaño
de las escalas o letras en las figuras, que no deberán bajar de los 2 mm. En figuras compuestas, cada parte
deberá etiquetarse con letras mayúsculas, el resto de las letras deberán ser minúsculas. Las escalas de dibujos y
fotografías deberán ser gráficas, utilizando unidades del sistema métrico decimal; no deberán hacerse referen-
cias a los aumentos de una determinada ilustración, ya que éstos cambian con la reducción. En su caso, se
recomienda la utilización de mapas con proyección UTM. Cada figura, gráfica o ilustración deberá presentarse
en hojas separadas y con numeración arábiga (1, 2, 3,...), sin separar "Figuras" y "Láminas". Los pies de
figura, en una hoja aparte, deberán acompañarse de su traducción al inglés (o español si el inglés es la lengua
del trabajo). Utilícese el esquema siguiente:
Figura 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal desplazándose; B: detalle de un rinóforo; C: branquia.
Las abreviaturas empleadas en las ilustraciones deberán incluirse en los pies de figura.
Los autores interesados en incluir láminas en color deberán consultar con el editor y sufragar el sobrecoste con
una contribución de 30 € por página. Por lo demás, deberán ajustarse a los mismos requisitos indicados para
las figuras.
Si se pretende enviar gráficas o ilustraciones en impresión de papel es imprescindible presentar originales de
buena calidad. Las imágenes en semitonos deben estar bien contrastadas y ajustarse al tamaño definitivo de
impresión; al componer fotografías sobre una hoja, procúrese que los espacios entre ellas sean regulares y que
estén debidamente alineadas. Téngase en cuenta que incluir fotografías de distinto contraste en una misma
página conlleva una pobre reproducción final. Las gráficas de ordenador deberán imprimirse con impresora
láser sobre papel de buena calidad.
• Las Tablas se presentarán en hojas separadas, siempre con numeración romana (I, II, III,...). Las leyendas se
incluirán en una hoja aparte acompañándose de una traducción al inglés. Deberán evitarse las tablas particu-
larmente complejas. Se recomienda reducir el número y extensión de ilustraciones, láminas o tablas al mínimo
necesario.
• Los artículos que no se ajusten a las normas de publicación serán devueltos al autor con las indicaciones de
los cambios necesarios.
• El Comité Editorial comunicará al autor responsable del trabajo la fecha de recepción del trabajo y la fecha
de envío a revisión. Cada original recibido será sometido a revisión por al menos dos investigadores. El
Comité Editorial, a la vista de los informes de los revisores decidirá sobre la aceptación o no de cada manus-
crito. El autor recibirá en cada caso copia de los comentarios de los revisores sobre su artículo. En caso de
aceptación, el mismo Comité Editorial, si lo considera conveniente, podrá solicitar a los autores otras modifica-
ciones que considere oportunas. Si el trabajo es aceptado, el autor deberá enviar una copia impresa del mismo
corregida, acompañada por una versión en un CD, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones corrien-
tes de Windows (pero no el formato .docx generado por Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macin-
tosh. La fecha de aceptación figurará en el artículo publicado.
• Las pruebas de imprenta serán enviadas por correo electrónico al autor responsable, exclusivamente para la
corrección de erratas, y deberán ser devueltas en un plazo máximo de una semana. Se recomienda prestar
especial atención en la corrección de las pruebas.
• De cada trabajo se entregarán gratuitamente 50 separatas, además de una versión electrónica en formato
.pdf. Aquellos autores que deseen un número mayor, deberán hacerlo constar al devolver las pruebas de
imprenta, y nunca posteriormente. El coste de las separatas adicionales será cargado al autor.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
• Iberus publishes research papers, notes and monographs devoted to the various aspects of Malacology.
Papers are manuscripts of more than 5 typed pages, including figures and tables. Notes are shorter papers.
Monographs should exceed 50 pages of the final periodical, and may be published as Supplements. Authors
wishing to publish monographs should contact the Editor. Manuscripts are considered on the understanding
that their contents have not been published or simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere.
• Manuscripts and correspondence regarding editorial matters must be sent to: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publica-
ciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga,
Spain and / or to the e-mail <sgofas@uma.es>.
• Manuscripts may be written in Spanish, English, Italian, French or Portuguese.
• Manuscripts must be typed double spaced (including the references, figure captions and tables) on one side
on A-4 (297x210 mm) with margins of at least 3 cm. An original and two copies must be submitted, together
with a CD or e-mail remittance containing the article written with a current Windows (but not .docx format
generated by Word 2007, mainly used with Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. When a paper has
joint authorship, one author must accept responsibility for all correspondence.
• The authors must inelude a list of at least 4 possible referees; the Editor can choose any others if appropriate.
• Papers should conform the following layout:
First page. This must inelude a concise but informative title, with mention of family of higher taxon when
appropriate, and its Spanish translation. It will be followed by all authors' ñames and surnames, their full
address(es), an abstract (and its Spanish translation) not exceeding 200 words which summarizes not only con-
tents but results and conclusions.
Following pages. These should content the rest of the paper, divided into sections under short headings. When-
ever possible the text should be arranged as follows: Introduction, Material and methods, Results, Discussion,
Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Unusual abbreviations used in the text must be grouped in
one alphabetic sequence after the Material and methods section.
• Notes should folio w the same layout, without the abstract.
• Footnotes and cross-references must be avoided. The International Codes of Zoological and Botanical
Nomenclature must be strictly followed. The first mention in the text of any taxon must be followed by its
authority including the year. In systematic papers, when synonyms of a taxon are given, they must be cited IN
FULL, including the periodical, in an abbreviate form, where they were described, and the type localities in
square brackets when known. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Synonyms
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Type locality: Marseille].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
These references must not be included in the Bibliography list, except if referred to elsewhere in the text. If a
full list of references of the taxon is to be given immediately below it, the same layout should be followed (also
excluding from the Bibliography list those which are not cited elsewhere).
Only Latin words and ñames of genera and species should be underlined once or be given in italics. No word
must be written in UPPER CASE LETTERS. SI units are to be used, together with their appropriate symbols. In
Spanish manuscripts, decimal numbers must be separated with a comma (,), NEVER with a point (.) or upper
comma (').
• References in the text should be written in small letters or Small capitals: Fretter and Graham (1962) or
Fretter and Graham (1962). The first mention in the text of a paper with more than two authors must
inelude all of them [Smith, Jones and Brown (1970)], thereafter use et al. [Smith et al. (1970)]. If an author has
published more than one paper per year, refer to them with letters: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). Avoid op. cit.
The references in the reference list should be in alphabetical order and inelude all the publications cited in the
text but only these. ALL the authors of a paper must be included. These should be written in small letters or
Small capitals. The references need not be cited when the author and date are given only as authority for a tax-
onomic ñame. Tifies of periodicals must be given IN FULL, not abbreviated. For books, give the title, ñame of
publisher, place of publication, indication of edition if not the first and total number of pages. Keep references
to doctoral theses or any other unpublished documents to an absolute minimum. See the following examples
(please note the punctuation):
Fretter V. and Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. In Ponder W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Figures must be original and provided preferably in electronic format and adjusted to page format and
column size. These should be one column (57 mm) or two columns (121 mm) wide and up 196 mm high, or be
proportional to these sizes. Two columns format is recommended. It is essential that all figures be supplied in
their original format (e.g. photographs as high-grade .jpg or as .tif files, graphs as Excel spreadsheets or Corel-
Draw files), as the files inserted into WORD documents cannot be used for printing. Digital images must be
given their final printing size with a resolution at least 300 dpi for colour and halftones, and at least 600 dpi for
black/white.
Take into account possible reduction in lettering drawings; final lettering must be at least 2 mm high. In com-
posite drawings, each figure should be given a capital letter; additional lettering should be in lower-case
letters. A scale line, labelled with SI units, must be used to indícate size; magnification ratio must be avoided
as it may be changed during printing. UTM maps are to be used if necessary. Figures must be submitted on
sepárate sheets, and numbered with consecutive Arabic numbers (1, 2, 3,...), without separating 'Plates' and
'Figures'. Legends for Figures must be typed in numerical order on a sepárate sheet, and a Spanish translation
must be included. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Figure 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal crawling; B: rhinophore; C: gills.
If abbreviations are to be used in illustrations, they should be included in the figure captions.
Authors wishing to publish illustrations in colour should consult with the editor and will be charged a contri-
bution of 30 € per page. They should otherwise follow the same standards as black and white prints.
If the authors want to send Figures in printed format, it is essential to supply good quality origináis. Half-tone
images must be of good contrast, and should be submitted in the final printing size. When mounting pho-
tographs in a block, ensure spacers are of uniform width. Remember that grouping photographs of varied con-
trast results in poor reproduction. Computer graphics must be printed on high quality white paper with a
láser printer.
• Tables must be numbered with Román numbers (I, II, III,...) and each typed on a sepárate sheet. Headings
should be typed on a sepárate sheet, together with their English translation. Complex tables should be
avoided. As a general rule, keep the number and extensión of illustrations and tables as reduced as possible.
• Manuscripts that do not conform to these instructions will be retumed for correction before reviewing.
• Authors submitting manuscripts will receive an acknowledgement of receipt, including receipt date, and the
date the manuscript was sent for reviewing. Each manuscript will be critically evaluated by at least two refer-
ees. Based of these evaluations, the Editorial Board will decide on acceptance or rejection. Anyway, authors
will receive a copy of the referees' comments. If a manuscript is accepted, the Editorial Board may indícate
additional changes if desirable. Acceptable manuscripts will be returned to the author for consideration of
comments and criticism; a finalized manuscript must then be returned to the Editor, together with a CD con-
taining the article written with current Windows (but not a .docx format generated by Word 2007, mainly used
under Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. Dates of reception and acceptance of the manuscript will
appear in all published articles.
• Proofs will be e-mailed to the author for correcting errors and must be returned corrected within one week.
At this stage no stylistic changes will be accepted. Pay special attention to references and their dates in the text
and the Bibliography section, and also to numbers of Figures and Tables appearing in the text.
• Fifty reprints per article and a .pdf file will be supplied free of charge. Additional reprints must be ordered
when the page proofs are retumed, and will be charged at cost. NO LATER orders will be accepted.
La Sociedad Española di Malacolooía
Junta Directiva desde el 11 de octubre de 2005
Presidente José Templado González
Vicepresidente Emilio Rolán Mosquera
Secretaria María Carmen Salas Casanovas
Tesorero Luis Murillo Guillen
Editor de Publicaciones Serge Gofas
Bibliotecario Rafael Araujo Armero
Vocales Ramón M. Alvarez Halcón
Benjamín Gómez Moliner
Alberto Martínez Ortí
Diego Moreno Lampreave
José Ramón Arrébola Burgos
La Sociedad Española de Malaco logia se fundó el 21 de agosto de 1980. La sociedad se registró como una aso-
ciación sin ánimo de lucro en Madrid (Registro N° 4053) con unos estatutos que fueron aprobados el 12 de
diciembre de 1980. Esta sociedad se constituye con el fin de fomentar y difundir los estudios malacológicos
mediante reuniones y publicaciones. A esta sociedad puede pertenecer cualquier persona o institución interesada
en el estudio de los moluscos.
Sede SOCIAL: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, d José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, España.
Cuotas para 2009:
INSCRIPCIÓN: 6 euros, además de la cuota correspondiente.
A los socios residentes en España se les aconseja domiciliar su cuota. Todos los abonos deberán enviarse al
Tesorero (dirección reseñada anteriormente) el 1 de enero de cada año. Los abonos se harán sin recargos para la
sociedad y en favor de la Sociedad Española de Malaco logia y no de ninguna persona de la junta directiva. Aque-
llos socios que no abonen su cuota anual dejarán de recibir las publicaciones de la Sociedad. Los bonos de ins-
cripción se enviarán junto con el abono de una cuota anual al Tesorero.
A los residentes en el extranjero se les ruega que abonen su cuota mediante giro postal en euros (Internatio-
nal postal money orders in euros sent to the Treasurer). Members living in foreing countries can deduce 6 euros
if paid before 1 5 April.
Cada socio tiene derecho a recibir anualmente los números de Iberas, Reseñas Malacológicas y Noticiarios que
se publiquen. .
Indice
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARES
3 9088 01497
170
27 (1) 2009
ISSN 0212-3010
nc>i
. 133
Iberus
vol. 27
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
I Oviedo, diciembre 2009
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Comité de Redacción (Board of Editors)
Editor de Publicaciones (Editor-in-Chief)
Serge Gofas Universidad de Málaga, España
Director de Redacción (Executive Editor)
Gonzalo Rodríguez Casero Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editora Ejecutiva (Managing Editor)
Eugenia Ma Martínez Cueto-Felgueroso Apdo. 1 56, Mieres del Camino, Asturias, España
Editores Adjuntos (Associate editors )
Iberus gualtieranus (Linnaeus, 1758), una especie emblemática de la península Ibérica, que da
nombre a la revista. Dibujo realizado por José Luis González Rebollar “Toza”.
Iberus
REVISTA DE LA
SOCIEDAD ESPAÑOLA
DE MALACOLOGÍA
Vol. 27 (2)
Oviedo, diciembre 2009
Iberus
Revista de la
Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus publica trabajos que traten sobre cualquier aspecto relacionado con la Malacología. Se
admiten también notas breves. Iberus edita un volumen anual que se compone de dos o más números.
Instrucciones para los autores
Los manuscritos deben remitirse a: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Bio-
logía Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España.
Los trabajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias). Se recomienda a los autores leer
cuidadosamente las normas de publicación que se incluyen en cada número de la revista.
SUBCRIPCIONES
Iberus puede recibirse siendo socio de la Sociedad Española de Malacología, en cualquiera de sus
formas, o mediante intercambio. Aquellos socios que deseen adquirir números atrasados deberán diri-
girse al bibliotecario.
Los no socios deberán ponerse en contacto con BACKHUYS PUBLISHERS, P.O. Box 321,
2300 AH Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-71-31 70 208, Fax: +31-71-51 71 856, Correo Elec-
trónico: backEuys@euronet.nl
Los resúmenes de los artículos editados en esta revista se publican en Aquatic Science
and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) y en el Zoological Records, BIOSIS.
Contents list published in Aquatic Science and Fisheries Abstracts and Zoological Records,
BIOSIS.
Dep. Leg. B-43072-81
ISSN 0212-3010
Diseño y maquetación: Gonzalo Rodríguez
Impresión: LOREDO, S. L. - Gijón
Iberus, 27 (2): 1-5, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
A new species of Lauria (Gastropoda, Lauriidae) from the
Canary Islands
Una nueva especie de Lauria (Gastropoda, Lauriidae) de las Islas
Canarias
David T. HOLYOAK* and Geraldine A. HOLYOAK*
Recibido el 6-IV-2009. Aceptado el 23-VI-2009
ABSTRACT
A new species of Lauria is described from La Gomera, Canary Islands, where it coexists
with L. fanalensis (R.T. Lowe, 1852) on trunks of trees in the laurel forests. The differences
in their adult and especially ¡uvenile shells are described and figured.
RESUMEN
Se describe una nueva especie de Lauria de La Gomera, Islas Canarias, en donde coexiste
con L. fanalensis (R.T. Lowe, 1 852) en troncos de árboles de la laurisilva. Se detallan e ilus-
tran las diferencias en su morfología adulta y particularmente en sus conchas juveniles.
INTRODUCTION
Three species of the genus Lauria are
recognised in Macaronesia and three in
Europe (Pilsbry, 1922-1926; Zilch, 1985;
Falkner, Bank and von Proschwitz,
2001; Bank, Groh and Ripken, 2002).
Of these, the rather variable L. cylindra-
cea (Da Costa, 1778) occurs not only in
the Canary Islands, Madeiran Islands
and the Azores, but also over much of
western and Southern Europe and in
north-west Africa. The Macaronesian
endemic L. fanalensis (R.T. Lowe, 1852),
known from Madeira and the Canary
Islands, resembles a small form of L.
cylindracea, with weak apertural teeth
and less thickened peristome. The
Azores endemic L. fasciolata (Morelet,
1860) is more distinctive, so that it is
now segregated in subgenus Senilauria
Pilsbry, 1928. L. sempronii (Charpentier,
1837) occurs in western and Southern
Europe, eastwards to Irán and south-
wards to northern Algeria. The poorly
known L. reischuetzi Falkner, 1985 has
been found only in river floodline
debris in Istra (Slovenija); it is appa-
rently allied to L. sempronii and it may
be a localised endemic species that lives
underground (Falkner, 1985). Wollas-
ton (1878) noted that fanalensis 'may be
only a depauperated State' of L. cylindra-
cea, but he treated it as distinct because
of differences in their shells and hábi-
tats, with fanalensis occurring mainly on
tree trunks in laurel forests at interme-
diate to high elevations ('damp sylvan
districts of a high altitude') whereas
cylindracea 'is emphatically an inhabitant
of the dry and cultivated districts,
abounding more and more as we
descend to the level of the sea'. Nevert-
heless, several populations we have
* Quinta da Cachopa, Barcoila, 6100-014 Cabezudo, Portugal
1
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
studied from the Canary Islands (La
Palma, 2; La Gomera, 1) are interme-
díate in shell size and morphology
between L. fanalensis and L. cylindracea
and they appear to intergrade rather
than coexist. During fieldwork in the
Canary Islands in February 2006 nume-
rous specimens of Lauria were collected
from tree trunks at two localities in
laurel forest at 1100-1250 m elevation on
La Gomera. These were assumed to all
be of L. fanalensis, until later microscopic
study revealed that two rather similar
species were present in approximately
equal numbers, living together at both
localities. One of these is typical L. fana-
lensis, the other which is apparently
undescribed is named in this paper. Its
adult shells show only rather subtle dif-
ferences from those of L. fanalensis, but
the juvenile shells are markedly diffe-
rent. A recent molecular study (Renker,
2007) has revealed a pattern of genetic
differentiation in european L. cylindracea
that is not reflected in shell differences.
A fuller study involving molecular tech-
niques may therefore be necessary to
elucídate the relationships of Macarone-
sian L. cylindracea, L. fanalensis and the
new species.
TAXONOMIC PART
Family Lauriidae Steenberg, 1925
Genus Lauria J.E. Gray, 1840
Subgenus Lauria
Type species: Pupa umbilicata Draparnaud, 1801 = Turbo cylindraceus Da Costa, 1778.
Remarks: Allocation of the genus
Lauria to the Lauriidae rather than
Pupillidae and recognition of subge-
nera follows Bank, Bouchet, Falkner,
Gittenberger, Hausdorf, von
Proschwitz and Ripken (2001), Bank
et al. (2002) and Falkner et al.
(2001).
Lauria gomerensis spec. nov. (Figs. 1-7)
Type material: From type-locality, adult holotype (Figs. 1-3; in the BM, reg. no. 20090224) and two
juvenile paratypes (Figs. 4-7; in the BM, reg. nos. 20090225, 20090226 ); 15 adult and 3 juvenile
paratypes in Collection of G.A. Holyoak; 1 adult and 1 juvenile paratypes in Collection of Dr Heike
Kappes, University of Cologne, Germany. 9 adult paratypes from different locality (La Gomera: ca
1 km E. of Las Hayas, 28R 02756/31139, ca 1100 m alt., tree trunks in tall oíd laurel forest, leg. G.A.
and D.T. Holyoak, 15 Feb. 2006, site G16) in Collection of G.A. Holyoak
Type locality: La Gomera, Islas Canarias, Spain: Cabezo del Pajarito (E. of Garajonay), 28R
02800/31113, ca 1250 m alt., tree trunks in shallow valley in laurel forest, leg. G.A. and D.T. Holyoak,
13 Feb. 2006, site G9.
Etymology: The specific epiphet is derived from the ñame of the island of La Gomera.
Description: Adult shell (Figs. 1-3)
ovoid, of 5-6 moderately convex whorls,
the body whorl lacking a basal keel, the
mouth rounded. Peristome slightly thic-
kened, sharply reflected, flattened and
whitish. Parietal area lacking any callus.
Angular tooth small, whitish, not joined
to peristome and not prolonged into
mouth; columellar tooth lacking. Juve-
nile shells (Figs. 4-7) with only slight
marginal keel; slender angular tooth
prolonged inside mouth as low narrow
ridge extending for about one-third of
whorl; slender columellar tooth prolon-
ged inwards for short distance; largest
whorl lacking thickened transverse
palatal bars. Shell light brown, translu-
cent, very glossy, with only rather faint
growth ridges; protoconch very faintly
punctate.
2
Holyoak AND HOLYOAK: A new species of Lauria from the Canary Islands
Figures 1-7. Lauria gomerensis. 1-3: holotype, adult shell, 2.85 mm (BM 20090224); 4, 5:
paratype, juvenile shell, 2.15 mm (BM 20090225); 6, 7: paratype, juvenile shell, 1.7 mm (BM
20090226).
Figuras 1-7. Lauria gomerensis. 1-3: holotipo, concha adulta, 2,85 mm (BM 20090224); 4, 5: para-
tipo, concha juvenil, 2,15 mm (BM 20090225); 6, 7: paratipo, concha juvenil, 1,7 mm (BM
20090226).
Dimensions: holotype 2.85 x 1.7 mm,
25 adult paratypes 2.5-3. 1 x 1.5-1. 7 mm.
Distribution and habitat: Collected
from two localities at 1100-1250 m alti-
tude on the island of La Gomera (see
above). At both sites it was found only
on vertical bark of the smooth trunks of
a small minority of laurel forest trees
(saplings to oíd trees, of a species of
Lauraceae and llex sp.), mainly 1.0-2. 5 m
above the ground, on bark overhung by
pendent mats or wefts of bryophytes
3
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figures 8-14. Lauria fanalensis. 8-10: adult shell, 3.15 mm (specimen in Collection of G.A.
Holyoak; from La Gomera, Islas Canarias, Spain: Cabezo del Pajarito (E. of Garajonay), 28R
02800/31113, ca 1250 m alt., tree trunks in shallow valley in laurel forest, leg. G.A. and D.T.
Holyoak, 13 Feb. 2006, site G9); 11, 12: juvenile shell, 1.4 mm; 13, 14: juvenile shell, 1.05 mm
(both specimens in Collection of G.A. Holyoak; from La Gomera, Islas Canarias, Spain: Cabezo
del Pajarito (E. of Garajonay), 28R 02800/31113, ca 1250 m alt., tree trunks in shallow valley in
laurel forest, leg. G.A. and D.T. Holyoak, 13 Feb. 2006, site G9).
Figuras 8-14. Lauria fanalensis. 8-10: concha adulta, 3,15 mm (ejemplar en colección de G.A.
Holyoak; de La Gomera, Islas Canarias, España: Cabezo del Pajarito (E. de Garajonay ), 28R
02800/31113, ca 1250 m alt., troncos de árboles en valle poco profundo en la laurisilva, leg. G.A. y
D.T. Holyoak, 13 feb. 2006, sitio G9); 11, 12: concha juvenil, 1,4 mm; 13, 14: concha juvenil, 1,05
mm; barra de escala 2 mm ( ambos ejemplares en colección de G.A. Holyoak; de La Gomera, Islas Cana-
rias, España: Cabezo del Pajarito (E. de Garajonay), 28R 02800/31113, ca 1250 m alt., troncos de
árboles en valle poco profundo en la laurisilva, leg. G.A. y D.T. Holyoak, 13 feb. 2006, sitio G9).
4
Holyoak AND HOLYOAK: A new species of Lauria from the Canary Islands
(particularly robust pleurocarpous mos-
ses including Neckera sp.). It was accom-
panied in the same microhabitat by si-
milar numbers of L. fanalensis, frequent
Columella microspora (R.T. Lowe, 1852) a
few individuáis of Hemicycla laurijona
(Alonso and Ibañez, 2007) and rare in-
dividuáis of a Napaeus sp. Remarks :
Shells of L. gomerensis have been compa-
red with those of L. fanalensis living with
it (Figs. 8-14) and from elsewhere in the
Canary Islands (in Collection of G.A.
Flolyoak) and numerous topotypes from
Madeira (BM). The adult shells of L. go-
merensis differ in being smaller with
more swollen whorls, stronger gloss on
the periostracum, fainter lines of
growth, lack of a columellar tooth and
lack of any parietal callus. Immature
shells of these two species differ more
conspicuously because the strong trans-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks are due to the Mollusca
Section of the Natural History Mu-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alonso M.R. and Ibañez M. 2007. Anatomy
and function of the penial twin papillae Sys-
tem of the Helicinae and description of two
new, small Hemicycla species from the laurel
forest of the Canary Islands. Zootaxa 1482: 1-
23.
Bank R.A., Bouchet P., Falkner G., Gitten-
BERGER E., HAUSDORF B., VON PROSCHWITZ T.
and Ripken T.E.J. 2001. Supraspecific clas-
sification of European non-marine Mollusca
(CLECOM Sections I + II). Heldia, München
4(1/2): 77-128.
Bank R.A., Groh K. and Ripken T.E.J. 2002. Ca-
talogue and bibliography of the nonmarine
Mollusca of Macaronesia. In: Falkner, M.,
Groh, K. and Speight, M.C.D. (Eds), Collec-
tanea Malacologica. Festschriftfür Gerhard Falk-
ner. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. Pp. 89-235.
Falkner G. 1985. Lauria(L.) reischuetzi n. sp. aus
Istrien (Gastropoda: Pupillacea). Heldia, Mün-
chen 1 (2): 45-46, pl. 7a.
Falkner G., Bank R.A. and von Proschwitz
T. 2001. Check-list of the non-marine mo-
lluscan species-group taxa of the States of
northern, Atlantic and central Europe (CLE-
COM I). Heldia, München, 4: 1-76.
verse palatal bars inside the largest
whorl of L. fanalensis (and L. cylindracea)
visible through the translucent shell
wall (Figs. 12, 14) are completely lacking
in L. gomerensis (Figs. 5, 7). Other diffe-
rences in the juvenile shells are the
much more strongly keeled periphery of
the body whorl in L. fanalensis and the
stronger development of its angular and
columellar teeth, which form higher
whitish ridges that are prolonged furt-
her back inside the mouth.
L. gomerensis might be endemic in
the laurel forest of La Gomera. Nume-
rous specimens collected by the authors
from similar habitats on La Palma (6
localities) and Teneriffe (3 localities) in
2002 and 2006 are all L. fanalensis (or
intermediate between that species and
L. cylindracea ), as are museum speci-
mens from Madeira (BM).
seum for access to specimens in their
care.
Pilsbry H.A. 1922-1926. Pupillidae (Orculinae,
Pagodulinae, Acanthinulinae, etc.). Manual of
Conchology (Second Series: Pulmonata) 27 (105):
1-80, pl. 1-5 (1922); 27 (106): 81-128, pl. 6-11
(1923); 27 (107): 129-176, pl. 12-18 (1924); 27
(108): 177-369, i-iv, pl. 19-32 (1926). Concho-
logical Department, Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
Renker C. 2007. Genetic break in Lauria cylin-
dracea (Da Costa 1778). Archiv fur Mollusken-
kunde, 136 (1): 1-7.
Wollaston T.V. 1878. Testacea Atlántica or the
land and freshwater shells of the Azores,
Madeiras, Salvages, Canaries, Cape Verdes, and
Saint Helena. L. Reeve and Co. London. xi +
588 pp.
Zilch A. 1985. Die Typen und Typoide des Na-
tur-Museums Senckenberg, 75: Mollusca: Pu-
pillacea (5): Pupillidae: Lauriinae, Argninae.
Archiv fur Molluskenkunde, 116 (1/3): 119-136,
pl. 1, 2.
5
Iberus , 27 (2): 7-72, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Las náyades de la península Ibérica
As náiades da Península Ibérica
The naiads of the Iberian Península
Rafael ARAUJO1, Joaquim REIS2, Annie MACHORDOM1, Carlos TOLEDO1,
María José MADEIRA3, Ignacio GÓMEZ4, Juan Carlos VELASCO5, Javier
MORALES6, José Miguel BAREA7, Paz ONDINA8 e Iker AYALA9
Recibido el 19-V-2009. Aceptado el 9-IX-2009
RESUMEN
Se aporta información sobre la descripción original, sinonimias, taxonomía, distribución,
morfología, ciclo vital, hábitat y estado de conservación de las diez especies de náyades
(moluscos bivalvos de la superfamilia Unionoidea) nativas de la península Ibérica: Marga-
ritifero ouriculoria (Spengler, 1793), AT margaritifera (L., 1758), Potomida littoralis
(Cuvier, 1798), Unió mancus Lamarck, 1819, U. gibbus Spengler, 1793, U. delphinus
Spengler, 1793, U. tumidiformis Castro, 1885, U. ravoisieri Deshayes, 1847, Anodonta
anatina (L., 1758) y A. cygnea (L., 1758). Se restablece Unió delphinus , Spengler, 1793
como el nombre válido para la especie ibérica conocida hasta la fecha como Unió picto-
rum y se cita por primera vez la presencia de Unió ravoisieri Deshayes, 1 847 en la penín-
sula Ibérica.
Además se ilustran las conchas y detalles anatómicos de todas las especies, incluyendo,
cuando se conoce, la forma y dimensiones de sus gloquidios así como información sobre
los peces hospedadores de los mismos.
También se aportan las recomendaciones que, como expertos, consideramos deben lle-
varse a cabo por parte de las autoridades encargadas de la gestión de la biodiversidad
para garantizar la conservación futura de las especies de este grupo animal tan amena-
zado.
1 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). José Gutiérrez Abascal 2. 28006 Madrid, España, e-mail: rafa-
el@mncn.csic.es; carlostc@mncn.csic.es; annie@mncn.csic.es
2 Universidade de Lisboa. Faculdade de Ciencias. Centro de Biologia Ambiental. 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal, e-
mail: joaqreis@gmail.com
3 Universidad del País Vasco. Facultad de Farmacia. Departamento de Zoología y Biología Celular Animal.
Paseo de la Universidad 7. 01006 Vitoria, España, e-mail: mariajose.madeira@ehu.es
4 Sodemasa. Avda. César Augusto 14. 50004 Zaragoza, e-mail: igomez@sodemasa.com
5 Servicio Territorial de Medio Ambiente de Salamanca. Junta de Castilla y León. Villar y Macías 1. 37071
Salamanca, España, e-mail: velmarju@jcyl.es
6 Universidad de Salamanca. Departamento de Biología Animal. Campus Miguel de Unamuno. 37007
Salamanca, España, e-mail: negro@usal.es
7 C/ Angel Casas, 11. Urbanización Aben-Humeya. Jun, 18017 Granada, España, e-mail: jbarea@egmasa.es
8 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Facultade de Veterinaria. Departamento de Zooloxía e Antropoloxía
Física. 27002 Lugo, España, e-mail: mapaz.ondina@usc.es
9 Asociación para la Conservación y Estudio de la Biodiversidad (ACEBI). Palencia 24. 01002 Vitoria, España:
ikerayala@yahoo . es
7
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
RESUMO
Dispombiliza-se ¡nformagáo sobre a descripáo original, sinonimias, taxonomía, distribui-
do, morfología, ciclo de vida, habitat e estado de conservado das dez espécies de
náiades (moluscos bivalves pertencentes á superfamília Unionoidea) nativas da Península
Ibérica: Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793), M. margaritifera (L., 1758), Potomido
littoralis (Cuvier, 1798), Unió moncus Lamarck, 1819, U. gibbus Spengler, 1793, U. delp-
hinus Spengler, 1793, U. tumidiformis Castro, 1885, U. rovoisieri Deshayes, 1847, Ano-
donta anatina (L., 1758) e A. cygnea (L., 1758). Se recupera Unió delphinus, Spengler,
1793 como o nome válido para a espécie ibérica conhecida até agora como Unió picto-
rum e se cita pela primeira vez a presenca da Unió ravoisieri Deshayes, 1847 na Penín-
sula Ibérica.
Também se ¡lustram as conchas e detalhes anatómicos de todas as espécies, incluíndo,
quando se conhecem, a forma e dimensóes dos seus gloquídios, assim como informado
sobre os peixes hospedeiros dos mesmos.
Finalmente, sao dadas recomendados sobre as acedes que devem ser tomadas por parte
das autoridades responsáveis pela gestáo da biodiversidade, com vista a assegurar a
conservado futura das espécies deste grupo animal táo ameasado.
ABSTRACT
We make available information about the original description, synonyms, taxonomy, distri-
bution, morphology, life cycle, habitat and conservation status of the ten species of native
naiads (bivalve mollusks belonging to the superfamily Unionoidea) of the Iberian Penín-
sula: Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793), M. margaritifera (L., 1758), Potomida lit-
toralis (Cuvier, 1798), Unió mancus Lamarck, 1819, U. gibbus Spengler, 1793, U. delphi-
nus Spengler, 1793, U. tumidiformis Castro, 1885, U. ravoisieri Deshayes, 1847,
Anodonta anatina (L., 1758) and A. cygnea (L., 1758). Unió delphinus, Spengler, 1793
is reinstated as the valid ñame for the Iberian species known hitherto as Unió pictorum,
and the occurrence of Unió ravoisieri Deshayes, 1 847 is reported for the first time in the
Iberian Península.
We also provide drawings of the shells and anatomical details of all species, and inelude
information, when known, about the shape and dimensions of glochidia as well as about
host fish.
Recommendations are given to authorities responsible for biodiversity management to
ensure the conservation of this threatened animal group.
INTRODUCCIÓN
Las náyades o grandes bivalvos de
agua dulce (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Unio-
noidea) se distribuyen por todo el
mundo a excepción del continente
antártico. Aunque todavía no se sabe
con exactitud la verdadera diversidad
del grupo, hoy se reconocen unas 840
especies repartidas del modo siguiente:
302 en el Neártico, 172 en la región Neo-
tropical, 85 en la Afrotropical, 219 en la
Indotropical, 45 en el Paleártico y 33 en
Australasia (Graf y Cummings, 2007).
Una de las características principales de
estos moluscos es su ciclo vital, ya que
presentan un estado larvario singular en
el reino animal; el más común es el
denominado gloquidio, que requiere la
presencia de un hospedador, en general
un pez, en el que tras una metamorfosis
se produce la fase juvenil. Es además
frecuente la especificidad entre náyades
y peces, de forma que no todas las espe-
cies de peces pueden actuar como hos-
pedadoras de los gloquidios de todas las
náyades. Ésta y otras razones (ver más
abajo) pueden fácilmente explicar
porqué las náyades están consideradas
actualmente como uno de los grupos
8
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
animales más amenazado del planeta.
En los Estados Unidos de América,
donde las náyades tuvieron una radia-
ción extraordinaria, más de la mitad de
las especies están actualmente extingui-
das, en peligro o amenazadas (Lydeard,
Cowie, Ponder, Bogan, Bouchet,
Clarck, Cummings, Frest, Gargominy,
HeRBERT, HERSHLER, PEREZ, ROTH,
Seddon, Strong y Thompson, 2004). En
Europa por su parte, la tasa actual de
extinción de las poblaciones de las dos
especies del género Margaritifera es
catastrófica (Araujo y Ramos, 2001), y
aunque no de forma tan grave o docu-
mentada, los otros géneros de náyades
( Unió , Potomida, Anodonta, Pseudano-
donta, Mycrocondylaea) están también en
franca regresión.
Otra característica importante de las
náyades es el papel que juegan en los
ecosistemas de agua dulce donde viven,
pudiendo afirmar que en un ecosistema
sin modificar las náyades serían el
grupo de animales con mayor biomasa
(Negus, 1966). Intervienen además en la
dinámica de los nutrientes de los siste-
mas acuáticos, removiendo fitoplancton,
bacterias y materia orgánica del agua y
sedimento y colaboran en la bioturba-
ción de los fondos aumentando su con-
tenido de oxígeno (Strayer, Caraco,
Colé, Findlay y Pace, 1999; Vaughn,
Nichols y Spooner, 2008). Dado que
una náyade del tamaño de Margaritifera
margaritifera (L.) filtra hasta 50 litros
diarios de agua, y que estas especies han
vivido en colonias de hasta 700 ejempla-
res por metro cuadrado, en ese tramo de
río se filtrarían 35.000 litros por día. Son
además especies con un alto poder
bioindicador, lo que probablemente ha
querido reflejar el nombre de náyade, ya
utilizado por el Caballero Jean-Baptiste
Lamarck (1744-1829) para referirse a
estos bivalvos, en referencia a las hadas
o ninfas que mantienen la pureza de las
aguas dulces. De este modo, la presencia
(o la desaparición documentada) de
poblaciones reproductoras (con ejempla-
res juveniles) de estos moluscos, puede
ser de gran utilidad para conocer
cambios en el estado de calidad y con-
servación de las aguas superficiales, lo
que hace de las náyades excelentes espe-
cies centinelas.
Una tercera razón que aumenta el
interés biológico de las náyades es su
antigüedad en el registro fósil. Algunos
autores consideran el origen del grupo
en el Paleozoico, hace más de 350 millo-
nes de años (ver Simpson, 1900;
Watters, 2001 y Graf y Cummings,
2006), y recientemente se han descrito
especies de los géneros Margaritifera,
Protopleurobema y Protoanodonta del
Mesozoico (Cretácico) de la península
Ibérica (Delvene y Araujo, 2009a, b). Se
trata por tanto de animales del máximo
interés para estudios de procesos evolu-
tivos a lo largo del tiempo y del espacio,
por lo que podemos asegurar, junto con
Graf y Cummings (2006), que la filoge-
nia de las náyades debe reflejar la
influencia de procesos como la ruptura
y separación de Pangaea en el Meso-
zoico, así como la evolución de las
cuencas hidrográficas durante el Tercia-
rio hasta las últimas glaciaciones del
Pleistoceno.
El primer trabajo dedicado a las
náyades de la península Ibérica es de
Morelet (1845), que cita la presencia de
13 especies en Portugal, de las que 8,
que además se ilustran, son considera-
das nuevas para la ciencia. Más tarde,
Drouet (1893), utilizando también la
taxonomía propia de la época, es decir
la de la Nouvelle École francesa, cita,
esta vez sólo para España, 48 especies y
describe e ilustra 18 como nuevas.
Según Haas (1917a), ninguno de estos
dos trabajos, ni el posterior de Locard
(1899), pueden utilizarse directamente
sin adaptación a los puntos de vista
modernos. Lo mismo podría decirse de
los trabajo de Castro (1873, 1885, 1887)
sobre la fauna malacológica de Portugal.
No obstante lo dicho, las localidades
que estos autores citan, así como las
ilustraciones de los ejemplares, siempre
de una gran belleza, aportan una infor-
mación de gran utilidad para la recopi-
lación de datos antiguos sobre las
náyades peninsulares. De este modo, no
es hasta la segunda década del siglo XX
cuando se hace el primer intento
moderno de estudio de todas las
9
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
náyades de la península Ibérica inclu-
yendo tanto Portugal como España
(Haas, 1917a). Aunque en esa época
todavía no se disponía de datos comple-
tos sobre la distribución de las náyades
ibéricas, sí se asumía la urgente necesi-
dad de dar un primer paso para su
estudio (Haas, 1917a). En el mencio-
nado trabajo, Haas, quizá el autor que
mayores esfuerzos ha dedicado al
estudio de la sistemática de las náyades,
presenta unas exhaustivas notas biblio-
gráficas en las que resume la siguiente
información: 1. La relación cronológica
de todos los trabajos sobre náyades ibé-
ricas con indicación de las especies men-
cionadas en cada uno (lista I). 2. La rela-
ción crítica con la equivalencia entre las
especies citadas en la lista I y los
nombres aceptados en la época (lista II).
3. La relación de citas geográficas de las
especies (lista III). Concluye Haas
(1917a) que las 161 especies ibéricas de
náyades citadas en todos los trabajos de
la lista I pueden reducirse a las 7
siguientes (Haas refiere los autores sin
paréntesis): Anodonta cygnea L., Unió
turtoni Payraudeau, Unió delphinus
Spengler, Unió batavus Lam., Rhombunio
littoralis Lam., Margaritifera auricularia
Spengler y Margaritifera margaritifera L.
Otro trabajo exhaustivo en el que se
consideran las especies de bivalvos ibé-
ricas es el de Azpeitia (1933), que
aunque no propone un análisis crítico
de la taxonomía del grupo, sí aporta un
pormenorizado estudio de la bibliogra-
fía y las citas correspondientes a las
náyades de España y Portugal. Nobre
(1912, 1930, 1941) por su parte, revisa la
fauna de náyades de Portugal, apor-
tando nueva información y revisando la
bibliografía. Su publicación de 1941 no
aporta nuevos datos con respecto a sus
anteriores obras, pero sí reduce la lista
de especies de Portugal a las 4 siguien-
tes: Margaritona margaritifera, Unió picto-
rum (L., 1757), Unió littoralis Lamarck,
1835 y Anodonta cygnea.
A partir de estos trabajos no existe
ya ninguna nueva referencia bibliográ-
fica que revise o que aporte datos críti-
cos o contrastados sobre las especies ibé-
ricas, salvo una clasificación tentativa
sobre los Unionoideos paleárticos (Haas,
1940) en la que ya se adivina la futura
monografía que el mismo autor publica-
ría (Haas, 1969) justo antes de su
muerte. En ese trabajo, Haas (1940) ya
presentaba las ideas "modernas" de su
maestro Kobelt, según el cual una clasi-
ficación natural de las náyades debía
tener en consideración su distribución
en las diferentes cuencas hidrográficas,
apuntando por primera vez la impor-
tancia del efecto de aislamiento de las
especies producido por las fronteras
hidrográficas. Se cita también en este
artículo por primera vez para las
náyades el concepto de "subespecie" o
"raza local", que sería la base de la clasi-
ficación sistemática que propondría pos-
teriormente. La monografía de Haas
(1969) supuso así un trabajo exhaustivo
de revisión de colecciones y bibliografía
en el que se aportan las sinonimias
(cientos en el caso de algún taxon) de
todas las especies de náyades mundiales
consideradas por el autor. En dicha
monografía, que junto con la de
Simpson (1900) se ha considerado por
los especialistas como el punto de
partida moderno sobre la sistemática de
la Superfamilia Unionoidea, Haas consi-
deró la existencia de una serie de espe-
cies fundamentales cada una de las
cuales englobaba diferentes "razas
locales" o "especies incipientes". Por
ejemplo, dentro de la "especie funda-
mental" Unió pictorum, Haas incluía 13
taxa (razas locales o subespecies) dife-
rentes con sus respectivas distribuciones
geográficas, a las que distinguía aña-
diendo un tercer nombre después de pic-
torum que correspondía con el nombre
de la especie con el que ese taxon había
sido descrito. Así, consideraba U. p. del-
phinus como subespecie diferente de la
otra subespecie ibérica U. p. mucidus.
Como ya se ha comentado, para definir
estas razas o subespecies Haas (1969)
continuó las ideas de Kobelt sobre la sis-
temática de las náyades. Para ello,
utilizó principalmente la forma de la
concha y su variabilidad, de modo que
cada subespecie es más fácil de distin-
guir en los centros que en los bordes de
sus áreas de distribución. Con respecto a
10
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
la península Ibérica, Haas (1969) consi-
deró la presencia de los siguientes taxa:
M. ( Margaritifera ) margaritifera (L.), M.
( Pseudunio ) auricularia (Spengler), Unió
pictorum mucidus Morelet, U. pictorum
delphinus Spengler, U. elongatulus penchi-
natianus Bourguignat, U. elongatulus
valentinus Rossmássler, U. crassus
batavus Matón y Racket, Potomida littora-
lis littoralis (Lamarck), P. littoralis umbo-
nata (Rossmássler) y Anodonta ( Ano -
donta) cygnea (L.). Para cada una de ellas
citaba un área de distribución que, como
se verá al hablar de cada especie, ha
variado muy poco con las novedades
taxonómicas aparecidas posteriormente.
Esta clasificación, a veces con ciertas
modificaciones, es la que se ha ido utili-
zando en todos los trabajos ibéricos pos-
teriores en los que se han citado especies
de náyades (Vidal Abarca y Suárez,
1985; Altaba, 1991; Bech y Altimiras,
2003; Pérez-Quintero, Bech y Huer-
tas, 2004).
En la última década del siglo XX e
inicio del XXI empieza a revisarse la
taxonomía de las náyades ibéricas
(Araujo y Ramos, 1998; Machordom,
Araujo, Erpenbeck y Ramos, 2003;
Araujo, Gómez y Machordom, 2005;
Araujo, 2008; Araujo, Toledo y
Machordom, 2009a; Reís y Araujo,
2009; Reís, Machordom y Araujo, en
rev.), estudiando no sólo los caracteres
habitualmente usados de morfología de
la concha y anatomía, sino que se inclu-
yen además caracteres moleculares,
cuyo uso es ampliamente recomendado
en la bibliografía especializada (Graf y
Cummings, 2006), así como información
sobre la biología de las especies (gloqui-
dio, peces hospedadores, época de
reproducción). El uso de estos caracte-
res, especialmente las secuencias de los
genes mitocondriales Col y 16S, ha per-
mitido superar la subjetividad que hasta
ahora atenazaba la taxonomía de las
náyades, limitada al estudio de un
carácter tan variable como es la forma
de la concha, pudiendo así identificar
linajes evolutivos muy claros. Gracias a
estos estudios se han distinguido espe-
cies ibéricas como Unió delphinus Spen-
gler, 1793 o Unió tumidiformis Castro,
1885 de sus especies gemelas europeas
Unió pictorum (L.) y Unió crassus Philips-
son, 1788, respectivamente. Estos estu-
dios han coincidido en el tiempo con un
renovado esfuerzo en el conocimiento
de las áreas de distribución, biología y
ecología de las diferentes especies
(Álvarez-Claudio, García Rovés,
Ocharán, Cabal, Ocharán y
Álvarez, 2000; Araujo y Ramos, 2000a;
SORIANO, VlLLENA Y ALONSO, 2001;
Araujo, Bragado y Ramos, 2000, 2001;
Grande, Araujo y Ramos, 2001;
Velasco, Araujo, Bueno y Laguna,
2002; Araujo, Cámara y Ramos, 2002;
Machordom et al., 2003; Reís, 2003;
Araujo, Quirós y Ramos, 2003;
Morales, Negro, Lizana, Martínez y
Palacios, 2004; Nagel, 2004; San
Miguel, Monserrat, Fernández,
Amaro, Hermida, Ondina y Altaba,
2004; Araujo et al., 2005; Reís, 2006;
Velasco y Romero, 2006; Velasco,
Araujo, Balset, Toledo y Machor-
dom, 2006; Bouza, Castro, Martínez,
Amaro, Fernández, Ondina, Outeiro
y San Miguel, 2007; López, Altaba,
Rouault y Gisbert 2007; Outeiro,
Ondina, Fernández, Amaro y San
Miguel, 2008; Reís y Araujo, 2009; Reís
et al., en rev.).
Todos estos trabajos confirman la
existencia en la península Ibérica de dos
familias de náyades, Margaritiferidae y
Unionidae, englobando la primera las
especies del género Margaritifera y la
segunda los géneros Unió, Potomida y
Anodonta. Las dos familias tienen una
muy amplia distribución en el mundo
(Haas, 1969; Graf y Cummings, 2007;
Bogan, 2008), caracterizándose la
primera por ser un grupo probable-
mente relicto con solamente 10 especies
vivas (Araujo, Toledo, Van Damme,
Ghamizi y Machordom, 2009b).
También en la península Ibérica los
unionoideos son actualmente uno de los
grupos animales más amenazados de
desaparición. Entre las causas funda-
mentales están la fragmentación y /o de-
saparición de sus hábitats (detracciones
de agua, alteración de los caudales y flu-
jos por las centrales hidroeléctricas y rie-
gos, aumento exponencial de industrias
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 1 . Distribución de Margaritifera auricularia.
Figura 1. Distribuigao de Margaritifera auricularia.
Figure 1. Distribution map ¿/Margaritifera auricularia.
contaminantes y cultivos), aunque otros
factores como la presencia de especies
de peces y bivalvos invasores también
pueden estar jugando un papel impor-
tante (Bogan, 1993; Ricciardi, Neves y
Rasmunssen 1998; Lydeard et al., 2004;
Strayer, Downing, Haag, King, Lay-
zer, Newton y Nichols, 2004). Esta dis-
minución en las poblaciones de náyades
se ha visto ya en los ríos peninsulares
(Reís, 2003; Morales et al., 2004; Ve-
lasco y Romero, 2006; Verdú y Ga-
lante, 2006; Barea, Ballesteros y Mo-
reno, 2008; Gómez y Araujo, 2008), por
lo que se hace necesario poner en cono-
cimiento de la sociedad y de las autori-
dades encargadas de la conservación de
la biodiversidad lo que hoy sabemos so-
bre este grupo animal tan amenazado.
Es por tanto del máximo interés dar a
conocer tanto los nombres válidos como
las distribuciones reales de las especies
ibéricas de náyades.
En el presente trabajo pretendemos
ofrecer una visión actualizada de dichas
especies, su diversidad, variabilidad,
adscripción taxonómica, distribución y
estado de conservación. También sobre
su biología y ecología, por lo que se
incluyen datos, cuando se conocen,
sobre el tipo de gloquidio, época de
reproducción y peces hospedadores. Los
mapas de distribución se han realizado
situando las localidades en cuadrículas
UTM de 10 x 10 km. La información que
ilustran se refiere a presencia de ejem-
plares y /o poblaciones vivos en los
últimos 20 años comprobada por los
autores. Gran parte de este material está
depositado en el Museo Nacional de
Ciencias Naturales de Madrid. No se ha
representado la presencia de valvas en
playas o zonas de sedimentación.
Para obtener las listas de sinónimos
se han utilizado sobre todo los trabajos
de Azpeitia (1933) y Haas (1969).
También se aporta información sobre
dónde se pueden localizar las primeras
o únicas ilustraciones de las especies, lo
que ha sido de gran utilidad a la hora de
12
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
identificar alguna de ellas (ej. U. gibbus).
En el caso de las dos especies de Ano-
donta se ha consultado la bibliografía
recomendada por Hanley (1855) para
reconocer los tipos de Linneo, funda-
mentalmente Lister (1678, 1685, 1770) y
Rossmássler (1835, 1836, 1837), así
como Schróter (1779). La bibliografía
en la que se pueden encontrar esas ilus-
traciones, así como las de los ejemplares
tipo de cada especie, se cita de forma
completa en los apartados de sinónimos
y descripción original.
En alguno de los casos la informa-
ción que se aporta es inédita; cuando es
así, los conocimientos en los que se basa
están en fase muy avanzada y se citan
como datos sin publicar. Aunque recien-
temente citada en España (Pou-Rovira,
Araujo, Boix, Clavero, Feo, Ordeix y
Zamora, 2009), no hemos considerado
la especie exótica Anodonta (= Sina-
nodonta ) woodiana (Lea, 1834). En
resumen, se trata de las siguientes 10
especies: Margaritifera auricularia (Spen-
gler, 1793), M. margaritifera (L., 1758),
Potomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798), Unió
mancus Lamarck, 1819, U. gibbus Spen-
gler, 1793, lí. delphinus Spengler, 1793,
U. tumidiformis Castro, 1885, U. ravoisieri
Deshayes, 1847, Anodonta anatina (L.
1758) y A. cygnea (L., 1758).
SISTEMÁTICA
Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793)
Sinónimos:
Unió sinuata Lamarck, 1819. Anim. sans. vert., 6 (1): 70. Sintipo ilustrado en Valledor y Araujo,
2006. Malacologia, 48 (1-2): 286, fig. 1.
Unió margaritanopsis Locará, 1889. Not. Conch., 13: 17. Ilustrado en Locard, 1893. Conchyliologie
Francaise, 151, fig. 163 y en Valledor y Araujo, 2006. Malacologia, 48 (1-2): 291, fig. 15.
Descripción original: Unió auricularius Spengler, 1793. Skrifter afNaturhistorie Selskabet, Kjobenhavn,
3 (1): 54.
Localidad tipo: Este de la India. Sin duda un error (ver más abajo). Lectotipo en el Zoological
Museum of the University of Copenhagen. N°: ZMUC BIV-315.
Ilustrado en: Haas, 1913. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I Kjobenhavn,
65: 54, textfig. 1; Knudsen et al, 2003. Steenstrupia, 27 (2): 267, fig. 3; Valledor y Araujo, 2006. Mala-
cologia, 48 (1-2): 286, fig. 5. Las referencias ilustran el lectotipo.
Comentario taxonómico : Aunque
según Spengler (1793) el ejemplar tipo
procede del este de la India, esta especie
sólo se conoce de Europa. Otro error de
Spengler (1793) en la descripción de
esta especie fue asignarle la ilustración
de Lister (1685-1692, figure 149, píate
4), ya que en realidad se trataba de una
figura de M. margaritifera (Haas, 1909;
Valledor y Araujo, 2006).
Haas (1910) describió el género
Pseudunio para incluir a esta especie y
así diferenciarla de M. margaritifera, pero
Pseudunio fue posteriormente sinonimi-
zado con Margaritona ( =Margaritifera )
por Ortmann (1911). No obstante, Pseu-
dunio ha sido más tarde usado como
subgénero por Haas (1969) para separar
M. auricularia y su variedad M. a. maro-
cana (Pallary, 1918) del resto de las espe-
cies del género. Más recientemente se ha
vuelto a utilizar como género por Smith
(2001) y Nienhuis (2003) para éstas y
otras especies de la familia. Aunque los
últimos estudios demuestran que M.
auricularia y M. marocana son dos espe-
cies diferentes que forman un grupo
monofilético o ciado dentro de la familia
(Araujo et al., 2009b), todavía no
sabemos si deben considerarse diferen-
tes subgéneros dentro de Margaritifera
(Huff, Campbell, Gustafson, Lydeard,
Altaba y Giribet, 2004). Como conclu-
sión, proponemos no utilizar Pseudunio
como género ni como subgénero para
incluir a M. auricularia al menos hasta
13
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 2. Margaritifera auricularia. Canal Imperial de Aragón en Grisén (Zaragoza).
Figura 2. Margaritifera auricularia. Canal Imperial de Aragón em Grisén (Zaragoza).
Figure 2. Margaritifera auricularia. Canal Imperial de Aragón at Grisén (Zaragoza).
14
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 3. Margaritifera auricularia. Río Ebro en Sástago (Zaragoza),
Figura 3. Margaritifera auricularia. Rio Ebro em Sástago (Zaragoza).
Figure 3. Margaritifera auricularia. Ebro river at Sástago (Zaragoza).
15
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
que no se obtenga una filogenia defini-
tiva de la familia que así lo recomiende.
Distribución : Paleártico oeste. Extin-
guida en gran parte de su área de distri-
bución (Altaba, 1990; Nesemann, 1993;
Araujo y Moreno, 1999; Araujo y
Ramos, 2000a) a excepción del cauce
principal del río Ebro en Aragón y
Tarragona, Canales Imperial de Aragón
y de Tauste (Fig. 1) (Aragón y Navarra)
(Araujo y Ramos, 2000b; Gómez y
Araujo, 2008) y ríos Loire y Charente en
Francia (Nienhuis, 2003). Actualmente,
la población más numerosa del planeta
parece ser la que vive en el Canal Impe-
rial de Aragón, en la provincia de Zara-
goza, con aproximadamente 3.500 ejem-
plares. Los datos publicados sobre la
población del bajo Ebro (Altaba, 1997)
han sido obviamente sobreestimados, y
todavía no se ha realizado una evalua-
ción contrastada del número de ejem-
plares que viven en los ríos Charente y
Loire. Existe una cita de 1903 del río Tajo
en Toledo (Azpeitia, 1933) y se han
encontrado valvas de ejemplares
muertos en las últimas décadas en el
Ebro en Burgos, Álava, La Rioja y
Navarra (Araujo, Madeira y Ayala,
2007).
En los ríos de Marruecos vive una
especie muy similar (M. marocana ) que
antes se consideraba sinónima de M.
auricularia, pero recientemente se ha
redescrito como especie diferente
(Araujo et al., 2009b).
Morfología externa (Figs. 2, 3 y 4):
Concha negra, alargada y muy gruesa, a
veces con silueta auriculada, especial-
mente en los ejemplares procedentes de
ríos con fuerte corriente. Los adultos
pueden alcanzar hasta 18 cm de longi-
tud. Interior de las valvas blanco naca-
rado muy brillante. Charnela con dos
dientes laterales posteriores en la valva
izquierda y uno en la derecha, todos
muy fuertes y alargados. Dientes pseu-
docardinales robustos y de aspecto pira-
midal, dos en la valva izquierda y uno
en la derecha. Por su gran tamaño sólo
podría confundirse con las especies de
Anodonta, pero éstas presentan siempre
conchas muy delgadas y frágiles y sin
dientes en la charnela. Los ejemplares
juveniles (Fig. 4), muy poco comunes, se
distinguen de Unió y Potomida por la
charnela y por ser mucho más aplasta-
dos.
En cuanto a su anatomía, y como el
resto de las especies de la familia Mar-
garitiferidae, presenta una serie de par-
ticularidades anatómicas (Fig. 5A) dife-
rentes de las de la familia Unionidae: 1.
las papilas del sifón inhalante son
pequeñas y arborescentes, nunca
cónicas. 2. carecen de abertura supra-
anal dorsal al sifón exhalante. 3. el dia-
fragma que divide las cavidades infra y
suprabranquial es incompleto y 4. las
dos láminas de cada branquia en vez de
estar unidas por tabiques continuos per-
pendiculares que forman tubos de agua
están fusionadas por septos interlamela-
res distribuidos al azar.
Ciclo vital : Especie muy longeva (60-
100 años). En la única población estu-
diada (Canal Imperial de Aragón) se ha
observado que existe un elevado por-
centaje de ejemplares hermafroditas
(Grande, Araujo y Ramos, 2001) y que
tiene un solo ciclo reproductivo al año
(Araujo, Bragado y Ramos, 2000). Los
gloquidios se liberan en febrero-marzo,
miden 140 x 130 x 60 jum y carecen de
ganchos (Fig. 6A), aunque sí presentan
unos pequeños dientes en su borde
ventral con los que se fijan a los filamen-
tos branquiales de los peces hospedado-
res (Araujo y Ramos, 1998). A diferen-
cia de la mayoría de las náyades, las
especies del género Margaritifera
incuban los gloquidios en las cuatro
branquias.
Solamente se conocen dos peces
nativos hospedadores de los gloquidios
de M. auricularia, el esturión, Acipenser
sturio L. y el pez fraile o bienio de río.
Salaria fluviatilis (Asso), el primero extin-
guido en el Ebro y el segundo en peligro
de extinción. En experimentos realiza-
dos en acuarios se ha visto que los glo-
quidios también se enquistan en las
branquias de las especies exóticas de
esturión Acipenser baeri Brandt y A. nac-
carii Bonaparte, dando lugar a náyades
juveniles que miden 190 pm (Araujo y
Ramos, 2000b; Araujo et al., 2001,
2002, 2003; López et al., 2007). También
ló
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 4. Juveniles de Margaritifera auricularia. A, B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C:
Canal de Tauste (Navarra).
Figura 4. Juvenis de Margaritifera auricularia. A, B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C: Canal
de Tauste (Navarra).
Figure 4. Juvenile shells ¿^Margaritifera auricularia. A, B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C:
Canal de Tauste (Navarra).
17
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 5. Sifones. A: Margaritifera auricularia ; B: M. margaritifera ; C: Potomida littoralis', D:
¿/razo mancus ; E: U. delphinus-, F: U. gibbus-, G: £/. tumidiformis ; H: U. ravoisieri-, I: Anodonta
anatina.
Figura 5. Sifoes. A: Margaritifera auricularia; M. margaritifera; C: Potomida littoralis; D: Unió
mancus; E: U. delphinus; F: U. gibbus; G: U. tumidiformis; H: U. ravoisieri; I: Anodonta
anatina.
Figure 5. Siphons. A: Margaritifera auricularia; B: M. margaritifera; C: Potomida littoralis; D:
Unió mancus; E: U. delphinus; F: U. gibbus; G: U. tumidiformis; H: U. ravoisieri; /: Anodonta
anatina.
(Página derecha) Figura 6. Gloquidios. A: Margaritifera auricularia ; B: M. margaritifera ; C, D:
Potomida littoralis ; E, F: Unió mancus.
(Pagina direita) Figura 6. Gloquidios. A: Margaritifera auricularia; B: M. margaritifera; C, D: Poto-
mida littoralis; E, F: Unió mancus.
(Right page) Figure 6. Glochidia. A: Margaritifera auricularia; B: M. margaritifera; C, D: Potomida
littoralis; E, F: Unió mancus.
18
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
19
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
se han obtenido resultados positivos con
la gambusia ( Gambusia holbrooki Girand)
(López y Altaba, 2005).
En ninguna de las poblaciones cono-
cidas existen ejemplares juveniles vivos.
Hábitat : Aparte de la excepción que
suponen los canales Imperial y de
Tauste, donde los ejemplares viven
semienterrados en fondos naturales de
arenas y gravas (Figs. 7 A, B), es una
especie propia de ríos grandes y cauda-
losos de aguas duras. Vive en los brazos
laterales separados por islas, donde el
agua se remansa y los peces paran para
alimentarse o frezar. Cuando aparece en
el cauce principal, suele ser en zonas
donde la corriente es menor por la pre-
sencia de meandros. También habita en
zonas de rápidos y aguas someras,
donde vive muy clavada entre las
piedras. Requiere fondos con sustratos
de gravas asentadas y estables, no
pudiendo sobrevivir durante mucho
tiempo en barras de gravas movibles o
fondos de cieno.
Como en todas las náyades, su
hábitat es el de los correspondientes
peces hospedadores, por lo que el cono-
cimiento de la biología de éstos puede
aportar las claves sobre el hábitat del
molusco. Las colonias de náyades serán
siempre más abundantes donde los
peces hospedadores de sus gloquidios
pasen más tiempo; por ello, las áreas de
sombra de las orillas y los taludes,
donde los peces bentónicos pasan gran
parte de su vida, suelen ser especial-
mente favorables para las náyades.
Conservación : Amparada por las
siguientes figuras de protección: En
Peligro de extinción en el Catálogo
Nacional de Especies Amenazadas y en
el Catálogo de Especies Amenazadas de
Aragón. Catálogo de Especies Amenaza-
das de Cataluña: Especie protegida de la
fauna salvaje autóctona A. Libro Rojo de
los Invertebrados de España: En Peligro
crítico (Verdú y Galante, 2006). IUCN:
En Peligro crítico. Directiva Hábitats
(Anexo IV): Especies animales y vegeta-
les de interés comunitario que requieren
una protección estricta. Convenio de
Berna (Anexo II): Especies animales y
sus hábitats estrictamente protegidos.
En Aragón existe un Plan de Recupera-
ción para la especie. Se ha redactado
además un Plan de Acción de la Comu-
nidad Europea (Araujo y Ramos, 2001).
Al ser su área de presencia tan redu-
cida, sus poblaciones tan poco numero-
sas y aisladas unas de otras, y no existir
en ninguna reclutamiento, el riesgo de
extinción de la especie es gravísimo. La
falta de efectivos en el Río Ebro y el
declive o desaparición de las dos únicas
especies hospedadoras de sus gloqui-
dios, hace prácticamente imposible la
reproducción natural. Además de todas
las alteraciones que está sufriendo su
hábitat, la invasión de especies de
moluscos [mejillón cebra -Dreissena poly-
morpha (Pallas)- y almeja asiática -Corbi-
cula fluminea (Muller)] y peces exóticos
en aguas del Ebro puede ser letal para la
especie.
La medida necesaria más urgente
para conservar a M. auricularia es garan-
tizar la supervivencia de la población
del Canal Imperial de Aragón frente a
las agresiones que está sufriendo ese
ecosistema por los actuales planes de
modernización (Gómez y Araujo, 2008),
para lo que sería necesario incluir la
especie en el Anexo II de la Directiva
Hábitats y posteriormente protejer el
Canal bajo una ley apropiada que
asegure la conservación tanto del patri-
monio natural (la especie y su hábitat)
como del cultural y artístico (la obra
civil).
Margaritifera margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sinónimos:
Unió elongata Lamarck, 1819 (syn. fide Nilsson, 1822). Hist. Nat. Anim. sans Vert. París, vol. 6: 70.
Alasmodonta arcuata Barnes, 1823 (syn. fide Lea, 1834). Amer. J. Sci., New Haven, 6: 277; lám. 12,
fig. 20.
Unió roissyi Michaud, 1831. Compl. Hist. nat. Molí. Draparnaud : 112, lám. 16, figs. 27-28.
20
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Unió brunnea Bonhomme, 1840 (syn. fide Dupuy, 1847). Mém. Aveyron, 2: 460.
Unió tristis Morelet, 1845 (syn. fide Haas, 1917a). Molí terr.fluv. Portugal: 107, lám. 31, fig. 2.
Margaritona freytagi Kobelt, 1886 (syn. fide Haas, 1940). Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk., Wiesbaden, 39: 98,
lám. 8, figs. 1-4.
Margaritona michaudi Locard, 1889 (syn. fide Germain, 1931). Contr. faune malacol. frang., 13: 17.
Margaritona pyrenaica Bourguignat in Locard, 1889. (syn. fide Germain, 1931). Contr. faune
malacol. frang., 13: 150.
Margaritona alleni Castro in Locard, 1899 (syn. fide Haas, 1917a). Arch. Mus. Hist. nat. Lyon, 7: 212.
Margaritona durrovensis Philips, 1928. Proc. malac. Soc. London, 18: 69-74, lám. 3-4.
Descripción original: Mya margaritifera Linnaeus, 1758. Systema Naturae, ed. 10, 1: 671.
Localidad tipo: En los torrentes de todo el orbe septentrional (In totius orbis ardid cataractis ).
Ilustrado en: Lister, 1685. Appendicis ad Historiam Animalium Angliae, London, lám. I, fig. 1.
Pontoppidan, 1755. The Natural History ofNorway etc, pág. 165; Lister, 1770. Historiae sive sinopsis
methodicae Conchyliorum et, Oxford, fig. 149; Schroter, 1779. Die Geschichte der Flüssconchylien, etc.
Halle, lám. 4, fig. 1.
Comentario taxonómico: Esta especie
fue ilustrada por Lister (1685) y Pon-
toppidan (1755) antes incluso de ser
descrita por Linneo. La población de
aguas calizas de Irlanda descrita como
M. durrovensis Phillips, 1928 se consi-
dera actualmente como un ecotipo de la
especie (Machordom et al., 2003;
Lucey, 2006).
Distribución : Holártico. Histórica-
mente la especie se distribuía por todos
los ríos salmoneros y trucheros de la
costa occidental europea entre los 40 y
60° N, desde la península Ibérica hasta
la costa Ártica de la antigua URSS
(península de Kola), y la costa este de
América del Norte (Ziuganov, Zotin,
Nezlin y Tretiakov, 1994).
En la península Ibérica (Fig. 8) se
conocen poblaciones en ríos atlánticos
desde el Baixo Miño hasta el Narcea
(Álvarez-Claudio et al., 2000; San
Miguel et al., 2004), en siete afluentes
del Duero: Águeda (Salamanca), Tera y
Negro (Zamora), Paiva, Tuela, Mente y
Rabanal (Portugal), en los ríos Cávado y
Neiva (Portugal), en el curso alto del
Bibey (cuenca del Miño) (Zamora) y en
un afluente del Tajo, el río Alberche
(Ávila) (Velasco et al., 2002, 2006;
Reís, 2003; Morales et al., 2004; LIFE-
Náyade, 2005; Velasco y Romero,
2006).
Morfología externa (Figs. 9, 10):
Concha de color marrón oscuro a casi
negro, gruesa, robusta y moderada-
mente comprimida. Los juveniles son de
color ámbar brillante a rojizo (Fig. 9B).
El margen dorsal ligeramente arqueado
junto con el ventral generalmente
cóncavo le confieren una forma arriño-
nada, aunque en zonas de gravas hete-
rométricas y fuerte corriente se pueden
encontrar ejemplares de siluetas irregu-
lares o deformes. El umbo está despla-
zado hacia la parte anterior, no sobresale
de la concha y en los adultos suele apa-
recer sin periostraco y muy erosionado.
Externamente se distingue de M. auricu-
laria por ser más ovalada, pequeña y
frágil.
El interior de la concha es de color
blanco nacarado con irisaciones de
diversas tonalidades. Las impresiones
de los músculos aductores son muy
patentes, tanto la del anterior, reni-
forme, como la del posterior, ovalado.
La impresión del músculo retractor
pedal es más evidente que la del pro-
tractor, aunque su límite se desdibuja
fusionándose con la del aductor ante-
rior. La charnela es larga con dientes
laterales vestigiales o prácticamente
ausentes en los adultos, aunque sí
existen en los juveniles. La valva
izquierda tiene dos dientes cardinales
poco desarrollados y uno la derecha;
suelen ser comprimidos lateralmente,
recurvados y levemente aserrados en su
parte superior.
Presenta las mismas particularida-
des anatómicas de la especie anterior:
papilas del sifón inhalante pequeñas y
arborescentes (Fig. 5B), nunca cónicas,
carece de abertura supra-anal, dia-
fragma incompleto y septos interlamela-
21
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
res distribuidos al azar entre las dos
láminas de cada branquia.
Ciclo de vida : Al igual que el resto de
las especies de la familia Margaritiferi-
dae, M. margaritifera incuba sus larvas
en las cuatro branquias, pudiendo alber-
gar una hembra adulta grávida de 3 a 10
millones de embriones (Ross, 1992). Los
gloquidios (Fig. 6B) son muy pequeños
(60 x 70 Mm)/ y aunque se han descrito
como carentes de dientes o espinas
(Nezlin, Cunjak, Zotin y Ziuganov,
1994; Pekkarinen y Valovirta, 1996),
Harms (1907, 1909) menciona la existen-
cia de unos pequeños dientes en el
borde ventral.
En el río Varzuga (Península de
Kola, Rusia) la gametogénesis ocurre
entre finales de agosto y mediados de
septiembre, con una liberación de glo-
quidios de entre 6-8 semanas y presen-
cia de peces infestados desde mediados
de septiembre a finales de junio del año
siguiente (Ziuganov et al., 1994). En
los ríos de Galicia sin embargo, parece
que la gametogénesis se produce en pri-
mavera-verano y que la proporción de
ejemplares hermafroditas simultáneos
es elevada (Grande et al., 2001). En
ríos del noroeste de Zamora se ha visto
que el periodo de gravidez se extiende
entre mediados de agosto y mediados
de octubre con gran simultaneidad en
todos los individuos (LIFE-Náyade,
2006; Morales, datos no publicados).
Los gloquidios tienen una mortali-
dad superior al 99% en los primeros
días (Jansen, Bauer y Zahner-Meike,
2001), por lo que disponen de poco
tiempo para ponerse en contacto con las
branquias del pez hospedador. El
salmón del Atlántico ( Salmo salar L.) y el
reo ( Salmo trutta trutta L.) parecen ser
los hospedadores óptimos de M. marga-
ritifera, mientras que otros salmónidos
como la trucha arco-iris [Oncorhynchus
mykiss (Walbaum)], o ciprínidos reófilos
como foxinos, bogas o barbos son resis-
tentes a las larvas (Bauer, 1987a, b,
1997, 2001; Bauer y Vogel, 1987; Ziuga-
nov ET AL., 1994; LIFE-Náyade, 2006).
La ausencia de Salmo salar en la mayoría
de los ríos de Europa occidental desde
hace 5 ó 6 décadas es probablemente la
razón por la cual sea actualmente la
trucha el principal hospedador; por lo
tanto, es imprescindible la presencia de
efectivos de S. trutta var. fario L. en los
ríos interiores ibéricos donde probable-
mente nunca han existido salmones.
La expulsión de gloquidios se realiza
de forma dependiente de la temperatura
del agua (Hastie y Young, 2003), rodea-
dos de una masa mucosa translúcida
que permanece a la deriva en la
columna de agua (Ondina obs. pers.).
Dado que los alevines de peces se ali-
mentan mayormente por deriva en
zonas someras y de fuerte turbulencia,
esta estrategia de las náyades podría
incrementar su éxito reproductivo
aumentando la probabilidad de que los
gloquidios sean ingeridos por el hospe-
dador. El tiempo de permanencia de los
gloquidios en las branquias del pez es
variable, entre 10 y 12 meses aproxima-
damente (Bauer, 1994; Hastie y Young,
2003). Los peces adultos parecen ser
menos susceptibles a la infestación que
los alevines de la última freza (edad 0+).
Aunque esto se atribuye a fenómenos de
inmunidad por infecciones previas
(Bauer, 1987c; Ziuganov et al., 1994),
se ha observado tanto infestación como
re-infestación de peces adultos (Young
et al., 1987; Geist et al., 2006: LIFE-
Náyade, 2006).
En condiciones favorables de experi-
mentación, las náyades juveniles crecen
de 0,5 a 2,5 mm en 26 meses de vida.
(Página derecha) Figura 7. Náyades vivas. A, B: Margaritifera auricularia ; C, D: M. margaritifera ;
E, F: Potomida littoralis.
(Pagina direita) Figura 7. Náiades vivas. A, B: Margaritifera auricularia; C, D: M. margaritifera; E,
F: Potomida littoralis.
(Right page) Figure 7. Living naiads. A, B: Margaritifera auricularia; C, D: M. margaritifera; E, F:
Potomida littoralis.
22
Araujo ET al.'. Las náyades de la península Ibérica
23
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 8. Distribución de Margaritifera margaritifera.
Figura 8. Distribuido de Margaritifera margaritifera.
Figure 8. Distribution map ^Margaritifera margaritifera.
crecimiento que realiza Unió pictorum en
menos de 11 meses (Wáchtler et al.,
2001).
La longevidad de M. margaritifera es
excepcionalmente alta, aunque variable
entre poblaciones dependiendo de la
latitud y de las condiciones ambientales
(Bauer, 1992; Ziuganov, San Miguel,
Neves, Longa, Fernández, Amaro,
Beletsky, Popkovitch, Kaluzhin y
Johnson, 2000). En el río Keret (Karelia,
Finlandia) alcanzan 167 años y un
tamaño de 162 mm (Ziuganov et al.,
1994), mientras que en Bavaria (Alema-
nia) la esperanza de vida está entre 30 y
132 años, con rangos de longitud
máxima de 80-145 mm (Bauer, 1983,
1992). Tanto FIendelberg (1961) como
Hastie, Young, Bonn, Cosgrove y
Henninger (2000a) señalan que es rela-
tivamente frecuente que la especie
supere el siglo de vida en río subárticos
de Suecia así como en poblaciones esco-
cesas. Sin embargo, en Galicia, coinci-
diendo con el extremo meridional del
rango de distribución de la especie,
alcanza una longitud máxima aproxi-
mada de 95 mm, sobrepasando muy
pocas veces los 130 mm, poseen una
tasa de crecimiento superior a la de las
poblaciones nórdicas con aguas más
frías, especialmente los seis primeros
años, y raramente alcanzan los 65 años
de vida (San Miguel et al., 2004). En
los afluentes del Duero se han encon-
trado náyades de longitudes superiores
a 130 mm (río Alberche), así como
poblaciones muy dispares que ofrecen
medianas poblacionales desde 64 (río
Rabanal) a 107 mm (río Tera) (Reís, 2003;
LIFE-Náyade, 2004).
A diferencia del patrón de variación
genética de las poblaciones centroeuro-
peas (Geist y Kuehn, 2005), las pobla-
ciones gallegas poseen baja variabilidad
intrapoblacional, alta diferenciación
genética entre cuencas y unas tasas de
autofecundación elevadas (entre un 48 y
un 70%) (Bouza et al., 2007; Toledo,
Araujo y Machordom, en rev.). Estos
24
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 9. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: río Landro (Lugo); B: juvenil del río Eo (Lugo).
Figura 9. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: rio Landro (Lugo); B: juvenil do rio Eo (Lugo).
Figure 9. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: Landro river (Lugo); B: Juvenil from the Eo river (Lugo).
25
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
resultados estarían en concordancia con
la predicción genérica de las poblacio-
nes periféricas: reducida variabilidad
como resultado de un pequeño tamaño
poblacional y aislamiento espacial. Todo
ello puede considerarse estrechamente
relacionado con la posibilidad de her-
mafroditismo simultáneo por parte de
las hembras de las colonias sometidas a
determinadas condiciones ambientales o
de estrés poblacional por baja densidad
de individuos (Bauer, 1987c).
Hábitat : En España únicamente
habita en ríos salmoneros y trucheros de
aguas limpias y muy poco calcificadas,
frías, ácidas, transparentes y muy bien
oxigenadas, con fondos de rocas,
piedras y gravas, en ocasiones con sus-
tratos finos y arenosos (Figs. 7C, D). Se
conocen poblaciones desde casi a nivel
del mar (río Eo) hasta zonas trucheras a
más de 1000 m de altitud (río Bibey).
Parece preferir profundidades entre 0,5
y 2 m, pero pueden vivir a mayor pro-
fundidad (ZlUGANOV ET AL., 1994).
Suele formar colonias en las zonas
más sombrías y cercanas a la orilla coin-
cidiendo en los ríos peninsulares con
aquellos tramos en los que se conserva
el bosque de ribera original, dominado
por Alnus glutinosa (Álvarez-Claudio
et al., 2000; Velasco et al., 2002, 2006;
LIFE-Náyade, 2004; Morales, Santos,
Peñín y Palacios, 2007; Outeiro et al.,
2008). Estos agregados se distribuyen a
lo largo del lecho fluvial, pudiéndose
encontrar desde individuos aparente-
mente aislados a colonias de decenas de
ejemplares.
Conservación: Catalogada en el Libro
Rojo de los invertebrados de España
como En Peligro (Verdú y Galante,
2006). Se ha incluido recientemente en la
categoría En Peligro por la IUCN (2008),
indicando que se encuentra enfrentada a
un riesgo muy alto de extinción en
estado silvestre en un futuro próximo.
Existe un Plan de Acción de la Comuni-
dad Europea (Araujo y Ramos, 2001)
para la conservación de todas las pobla-
ciones de sus Estados miembros. El
declive de esta especie en Europa se
considera dramático y está reciente-
mente documentado en el 90% de su
distribución conocida en el siglo XX
(Young et al., 2001).
A nivel autonómico únicamente ha
sido incluida en el Catálogo Gallego de
Especies Amenazadas, regulado por el
Decreto 88/2007, en la categoría En
Peligro de Extinción, lo que implica la
elaboración de un Plan de Recuperación
específico sobre el que actualmente se
está trabajando. Castilla y León está
desarrollando un Plan de Acción (LIFE-
Náyade, 2005) emanado de los esfuer-
zos de estudio y gestión del hábitat rea-
lizados en Zamora a través del Pro-
grama LIFE-Náyade (LIFE03/NAT/E/
000051).
Es importante reseñar que la elevada
longevidad de esta especie, aún con
importantes variaciones latitudinales,
oculta su precario estado de conserva-
ción al poder persistir durante mucho
tiempo poblaciones de adultos sin que
exista reclutamiento. Así, aunque en los
últimos diez años se ha ampliado de
forma importante el conocimiento sobre
el área de distribución de la especie en
la Península, tanto en las colonias de
baja como de alta densidad se observa
un déficit importante de las cohortes
más jóvenes (Álvarez-Claudio et al.
2000; Morales et al., 2004; Morales et
al., 2007; Outeiro et al., 2008). Esta
ausencia de renovación generacional
parece que data de las últimas décadas y
que deriva de las profundas modifica-
ciones que se han producido a lo largo
del siglo XX en los cauces fluviales y en
la calidad del agua. Todos los estudios
coinciden en mostrar a M. margaritifera
como una especie de requerimientos
muy específicos y de tasa neta de creci-
miento muy lento, lo que la hace espe-
cialmente vulnerable. Alteraciones
físicas en los lechos (dragados, encauza-
mientos, obras públicas, centrales hidro-
eléctricas...) y en las cuencas hidrográfi-
cas (deforestación, repoblaciones inten-
sivas con especies foráneas como euca-
liptos y coniferas, incendios forestales,
desertificación...) producen pérdida de
microhábitat para los exigentes juveni-
les, ya que los intersticios oxigenados de
los fondos de gravillas que precisan
quedan aterrados (- siltation -) (Geist y
26
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 10. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: río Arnego (Pontevedra); B: río Tambre (La Coruña).
Figura 10. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: rio Arnego (Pontevedra); B: rio Tambre (La Coruña ).
Figure 10. Margaritifera margaritifera. A: Arnego river (Pontevedra); B: Tambre river (La Coruña).
27
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Kuehn, 2005; Ziuganov, Kaluzhin,
Beletsky, y Popkovitch, 2001; Morales
et al., 2007). La proliferación de resi-
duos nitrogenados en los fondos produ-
cida por la contaminación química y
orgánica, en especial amonio, produce
un fuerte impacto que reduce las posibi-
lidades de reclutamiento y las de repro-
ducción para los hospedadores (Augs-
PURGER, KELLER, BLACK, COPE Y ÜWYER,
2003; Geist y Auerswald, 2007). Si a la
baja tasa de supervivencia de las fases
larvarias y la elevada mortandad de los
juveniles, se une la escasez de hospeda-
dores propia de los ríos ibéricos, se
puede comprender la vulnerabilidad de
las poblaciones ante la falta de recluta-
miento en ciclos muy prolongados.
Con excepción del hombre, la
especie en estado adulto tiene pocos
predadores naturales. Aunque en EEUU
está documentado que puede ser presa
de la rata cibelina [Ondatra zibethicus
(L.)] (Zhaner y Hanson, 2001) y en
Escocia se han citado evidencias (Cos-
grove, Hastie y Sime, 2007) de preda-
ción natural por parte de ostreros [Hae-
matopus ostralegus (L.)], visón americano
(Mustela vison Schreber) y nutria [Lutra
lutra (L.)], en la península Ibérica no está
descrita su predación por ningún verte-
brado semiacuático. Sí se conocen, sin
embargo, numerosos relatos de habitan-
tes ribereños que aseguran haber sacrifi-
cado hace décadas grandes cantidades
de ejemplares para alimentarse de ellos.
Dado que presentan unas caracterís-
ticas únicas respecto a las poblaciones
europeas, y una situación más frágil por
tratarse de poblaciones aisladas geográ-
ficamente en la periferia de su rango
ecológico, es necesario un esfuerzo coor-
dinado para la conservación de las
poblaciones ibéricas. Cabe destacar la
población del río Eo, con densidades
puntuales de 53 náyades m‘2 y un tramo
con un 30% de ejemplares menores de
65 mm, es decir, de individuos menores
de 10 años (Outeiro et al., 2008), así
como la del Rabanal, con densidades de
50 náyades m"2 y buen reclutamiento
(Reís, 2003). Aunque son datos relativa-
mente bajos en comparación con los del
norte de Europa (Hastie et al., 2000b),
destacan frente a otros ríos de la penín-
sula donde no se han detectado juveni-
les y raramente la densidad de adultos
es superior a 1 náyade m2 (Velasco et
al. 2002; Reís, 2003; Morales et al.
2004, 2007; LIFE-Náyade, 2004). En
otros ríos salmoneros se han encontrado
algunos juveniles, como el Narcea
(Álvarez-Claudio et al., 2000) o el
Masma (Outeiro et al., 2008), aunque
no en número suficiente como para ase-
gurar la viabilidad de la población. En el
río Alberche se localizaron algunos
ejemplares de menos de 30 mm
(Velasco et al., 2006).
Es de la máxima urgencia su inclu-
sión en el nuevo Catálogo Español de
Especies Amenazadas en la categoría En
Peligro, y simultáneamente, la puesta en
marcha de un amplio programa de res-
tauración de sus hábitats y de regenera-
ción de las poblaciones de truchas.
Potomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798)
Sinónimos: Al igual que ocurre con la mayoría de las náyades, P. littoralis tiene una enorme
variabilidad morfológica, lo que se refleja en los 31 sinónimos que aporta Haas (1969) o en los
93 de Graf (2007). En el listado siguiente solamente se han considerado nombres adjudicados
a especies ibéricas y francesas.
Unió littoralis Lamarck, 1801. Syst. Anim. sans Vert., 114.
Unió brevialis Lamarck, 1819. Hist. Nat. Anim. sans Vert., 6: 73.
Unió subtetragonus Michaud, 1831. Complément Hist. Nat. Molí. ten. fluv. Trance, Draparnaud, 111,
lám. XVI, fig 23.
Unió draparnaldii Deshayes, 1831. Descr. Coqu. Ten., 38, lám. 14, fig. 6.
Unió incurvus Lea, 1831? Trans. amer. philos. Soc., Philadelphia, 4: 97, lám. 13, fig. 27.
Unió pianensis Farines in Boubée, 1833. Bull. Hist. Nat. Trance, 1, Molí. Zoophyt., 27.
Unió cuneatus Jacquemin, 1835. Guide Ror. Arles, 124.
28
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Unió rotundatus Mauduyt, 1839. Tableau Indic. Molí. Vienne, 9, lám. 1, fig. 314.
Unió barraudi Bonhomme, 1840. Mém. Soc. Aveyron, 2: 430.
Unió bigerrensis Millet, 1843. Mag. ZooL, 3, lám. 64, fig. 2.
Unió littoralis var. umbonatus Rossmássler, 1844. Iconog. Land Siisw. Molí, 4: 36, lám. 69, fig. 849.
Unió astierianus Dupuy, 1850. Hist. Molí. Trance , 636, lám. 23, fig. 9.
Unió moulinsianus Dupuy, 1850. Hist. Molí. France, 640, lám. 24, fig. 10.
Unió rhomboideus Moquin-Tandon, 1855. Hist. Molí, terr.fluv. France, 2: 508, lám. 47, figs. 4 a 9.
Unió subreniformis Bourguignat, 1863. Molí. nouv. lit. peu connus, 138, lám. 34, figs. 4 a 6.
Unió hippopotami Bourguignat, 1869. Cat. Molí, terr.fluv. Paris quaternaire, 21, lám. 3, figs. 52 a 54.
Unió bigorriensis Locard, 1882. Prodr. Malac. franq., 1: 284.
Unió rathymus Bourguignat in Locard, 1882. Prodr. Malac. franq., 1: 284.
Unió hispalensis Kobelt, 1887. Iconog. Land Süsw. Molí, (2) 3: 53, lám. 88, fig. 492.
Unió calderoni Kobelt, 1887. Iconog. Land Süsw. Molí, (2) 3: 54, lám. 88, fig. 494.
Unió gandiensis Drouet, 1888. J. de Conch. Paris, 28: 103.
Unió pacomei Bourguignat in Locard, 1889. Contrib. faune malac. franq., 13: 20.
Unió calderoni var. salvadori Kobelt, 1892. Nachr. Bl. dtsch. malak. Ges., Frankfurt a. M., 24: 201.
Unió circulus Bourguignat in Locard, 1893. Coq. Eaux douces saum. France, 153.
Unió sphaericus Bourguignat in Locard, 1893. Coq. Eaux douces saum. France, 153.
Unió circinatus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 33, fig. 6.
Unió rhysopigus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 37, fig. 7.
Unió mauduyti Germain, 1897. Bull. Soc. Sci. nat. Rouen, 70. Nomen novum por Unió rotundatus
Mauduyt, 1839, no Unió rotundatus Lamarck, 1819.
Unió littoralis taginus Kobelt, 1903. Iconog. Land Süsw. Molí, (2) 10: 28, lám. 279, fig. 1795.
Unió kinkelini Haas, 1908. Nachr. Bl. dtsch. malak. Ges., Frankfurt a. M., 40: 177.
Unió batavus catalonicus Haas in Bofill y Haas, 1920. Treb. Mus. Cieñe, nat. Barcelona, 3 (3): 291, 363,
lám. 3, figs. 19 a 22.
Descripción original: Unió littoralis Cuvier, 1798. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux,
p. 425.
Ilustrado en: Bruguiére, 1797. Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois regnes de la nature, Paris,
lám. 248, fig. 2; Araujo, 2008. Graellsia, 64 (1): fig. 1. Ambas figuras ilustran probablemente el ejem-
plar tipo.
Comentario taxonómico: De los 7 taxa
que Haas (1969) considera dentro del
grupo Potomida littoralis, solamente dos
se distribuyen por la península Ibérica, P.
I. littoralis (Cuvier) [no Lamarck, como
dice Haas (1969)] y P. I. umbonata
(Rossmássler), pero los dos pertenecen a
la misma especie P. littoralis (Reís et al.
en rev.), a su vez la misma que se distri-
buye por Francia (datos sin publicar). Las
cinco especies de Potomida que cita
Altaba (1991) en los ríos del mediterrá-
neo "catalán" corresponden a P. littoralis.
Esta especie ha sido adscrita a los
géneros Potomida, Swainson (1840), Psi-
lunio, Stefanescu (1896) y Rhombunio,
Germain, 1991. También ha sido citada
con autor equivocado como Unió littora-
lis (Lamarck, 1801) y como Unió rhomboi-
deus (Schroter, 1779). Recientemente se
ha intentado aclarar toda esta confusión
nomenclatorial (Araujo, 2008).
Distribución: Paleártica circunmedite-
rránea. Suroeste de Europa: Francia,
España, Portugal y Grecia (Haas, 1969;
Araujo, 2008). También en el norte de
África (Marruecos, Argelia y Túnez) y
suroeste de Asia (Armenia, Turquía,
Siria, Israel y Palestina), aunque proba-
blemente se trate de especies diferentes
de aspecto muy similar a P. littoralis
(datos sin publicar). Fósil en el Pleisto-
ceno de las Islas Británicas, Alemania,
Balcanes y sur de Rusia (Ellis, 1978).
En la península Ibérica (Fig. 11) tiene
un área de distribución muy amplia,
ocupando la mayoría de las vertientes
atlánticas y mediterráneas.
Morfología externa (Fig. 12): Aunque
de aspecto muy variable dependiendo
del hábitat, quizá sea la especie de
náyade ibérica más fácil de identificar.
Concha sólida, alta y gruesa, de con-
torno variable: oval, elíptica, romboide o
29
Iberas, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 1 1 . Distribución de Potomida littoralis.
Figura 11. Distribuigao de Potomida littoralis.
Figure 11. Distribution map 0/Totomida littoralis.
ligeramente cuadrangular. Color oscuro,
de castaño a negro, a veces verdoso y en
ocasiones con líneas amarillentas radia-
les que parten del umbo. Los juveniles
de 1-2 cm tienen un color pardo claro y
la escultura del umbo se caracteriza por
abundantes pliegues ondulados bien
marcados (Fig. 13A) . En los adultos el
periostraco suele estar desgastado,
dejando visible zonas calcáreas blancas.
Charnela corta y fuerte, con dientes car-
dinales piramidales cónico obtusos,
fuertes y aserrados: valva izquierda con
2 dientes laterales y 2 cardinales y valva
derecha con 1 diente lateral y 1 cardinal.
Inserción del músculo aductor anterior
muy marcada. Normalmente alcanzan
tamaños de 6-8 cm, habiéndose seña-
lado como dimensiones máximas: 9,2
cm de longitud, 6,4 cm de altura y 3,1
cm de anchura (Haas, 1941).
Como en todas las especies de la
familia Unionidae, presentan una aber-
tura supra-anal dorsal a los sifones inha-
lante y exhalante. En la abertura inha-
lante (Fig. 5C) se observan papilas
cónicas de diferentes tamaños (más
pequeñas en el margen exterior) y en la
abertura exhalante, como en otros unió-
nidos, el borde parece ligeramente ase-
rrado por la presencia de papilas inci-
pientes que no llegan a asomar.
Los septos de los filamentos bran-
quiales están perforados y no son conti-
nuos como en otros uniónidos, aunque
en otras especies se ha observado que
esta característica puede variar con la
época de reproducción, de forma que
durante la incubación, los septos apare-
cen abiertos (Nagel et al., 1998).
Ciclo vital: Como la mayoría de los
Unionoidea es una especie dioica.
Alcanzan la madurez sexual a los 4-5
años de edad, cuando miden aproxima-
damente 4 cm (Nagel, 2004). A diferen-
cia de otras especies de la familia, las 4
branquias (y no solamente las 2 exterio-
res) actúan como marsupio para la incu-
bación (Haas, 1917b). En el Ebro se han
visto hembras grávidas en julio y agosto
30
Araujo ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 12. Potomida littoralis. A: río Vascao (Beja/Faro); B: río Valdeazogues (Ciudad Real); C, D:
río Ebro.
Figura 12. Potomida littoralis. A: rio Vascao (Beja/Faro); B: rio Valdeazogues ( Ciudad Real); C, D: rio
Ebro.
Figure 12. Potomida littoralis. A: Vascao river (Beja/Faro); B: Valdeazogues river ( Ciudad Real); C, D:
Ebro river.
31
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
y juveniles recién nacidos a principios
de septiembre (Haas, 1917b), así como
gloquidios entre los meses de marzo a
octubre (Araujo et al., 2000). Probable-
mente su época de reproducción no está
sincronizada, de forma que no todos los
adultos de una población se reproducen
a la vez (Nagel, 2004). Los gloquidios
(Figs. 6C, D) miden 0,21 mm, tienen
forma de cuchara y están dotados de
minúsculas espinas cuticulares en el
borde de las valvas, pero sin el fuerte
gancho ventral típico de otros uniónidos
(Giusti, 1973 ; Nagel, 1999).
En la península Ibérica los peces
hospedadores de sus gloquidios parecen
ser los barbos (género Barbus), aunque
también podrían actuar como tales las
bogas (género Chondrostoma ) (Haas,
1917b; Araujo et al., 2000).
Hábitat: Se trata de una especie típi-
camente fluvial, propia de los sectores
medios y bajos de las cuencas. Aunque
prefiere los ríos de mayor tamaño y cau-
dal, vive también en afluentes menores
con cierta corriente, en acequias y cana-
les de riego que mantienen los fondos
naturales, e incluso en grandes lagos (ej.
Ruidera, Bañólas). En los canales del
Ebro es la especie de náyade más común.
Muchas veces se encuentra enterrada en
zonas de sustratos gruesos, entre piedras
y rocas, aunque también aparece en lu-
gares tranquilos entre arena y fango
(Figs. 7E, F). Puede vivir en la zona cen-
tral del lecho del río, incluso hasta 6-10
m de profundidad (Haas, 1917b; Reís,
2006), pero es más común entre las raíces
de los árboles de las riberas y en los talu-
des. También entre piedras en zonas de
rápidos y aguas someras. Habita en
aguas de distinta naturaleza (silíceas, ca-
lizas) y, aunque necesita aguas limpias,
no aparece en aguas oligotróficas de
montaña.
Al igual que ocurre con sus distribu-
ciones, existe una clara coincidencia
entre los hábitats fluviales de esta
especie y los de los peces bentónicos del
género Barbus.
Conservación: Catalogada como Vul-
nerable en el Libro Rojo de los Inverte-
brados de España (Verdú y Galante,
2006), De Interés Especial en el Catálogo
de Especies Amenazadas de Castilla-La
Mancha y Vulnerable en el Catálogo
Gallego de Especies Amenazadas y en el
Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de
Andalucía (Barea-Azcón, Balleste-
ros-Duperón y Moreno, 2008).
Cada vez es menos frecuente encon-
trar grandes colonias, apareciendo
poblaciones con muy pocos individuos
y sin juveniles. Es una especie en franca
regresión que ha desaparecido de
muchas localidades en Galicia (Rolán,
1998), Comunidad Valenciana (Martí-
nez-Ortí y Robles, 2003), Portugal
(Reís, 2006), Madrid (Soler, Moreno,
Araujo y Ramos, 2006), Castilla y León
(Velasco y Romero, 2006) y Andalucía
(Barea et al., 2008).
Dado que la tasa actual de desapari-
ción de las náyades es catastrófica, y que
cada vez son mayores las afecciones
sobre los ríos donde habita (tanto natu-
rales -sequías, riadas- como artificiales -
detracciones de agua, embalses, eutrofi-
zación-), se recomienda su inclusión en
el nuevo Catálogo Español de Especies
Amenazadas en la Categoría de Vulne-
rable.
Unió mancus Lamarck, 1819
Sinónimos: Se han listado como sinónimos de U. mancus todos los que Haas (1969) considera
sinónimos de U. elongatulus mancus Lamarck (ver más abajo) y U. elongatulus moquinianus
Dupuy, pero no los de U. e. requienii Michaud. El listado de sinónimos de U. mancus no será
definitivo hasta que se conozca la identidad exacta de las diferentes poblaciones europeas de
las subespecies de U. elongatulus.
Unió moquinianus Dupuy, 1843. Essai Molí, terr.fluv., 80, figs. 1-2.
Unió ardusianus Reyniés, 1843. Lettre a Moquin-T andón, 5, lám. 1, figs. 7-8.
Unió aleroni Companyo y Massot, 1845. Bull. Soc. Agricult. Sci. Lettr. Pyrén.-Orient., Perpignan: 6,
234-235, fig. 2. (Sinonimizado por Bourguignat, 1866).
32
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Unió valentinus Rossmássler, 1854. Iconogr. Land-Sussw. Molí., 37, lám. 69, fig. 852.
Unió graellsianus Bourguignat, 1865. Molí. nouv. litig. peu connus, 147, lám. 23, figs. 4-7.
Unió courquinianus Bourguignat, 1865. Molí. nouv. litig. peu connus, 149, lám. 26.
Unió condatinus Letourneux in Locard, 1882. Prodr. Malacol. franq., 1, 356.
Unió gobionum Bourguignat in Locard, 1882. Prodr. Malacol. franq., 1, 364.
Unió mucidulus Bourguignat in Locard, 1882. Prodr. Malacol. franq., 1, 366.
Unió mongazonae Servain, 1887. Bull. Soc. malac. France, París, 4, 253.
Unió asticus Servain, 1887. Bull. Soc. malac. France, París, 4, 259.
Unió eutrapelus Servain, 1887. Bull. Soc. malac. France, París, 4, 260.
Unió antimoquinianus Locard, 1889. Rév. Esp. fran^. Margaritona et Unió, 121.
Unió oberthurianus Bourguignat in Locard, 1889. Rév. Esp. frang. Margaritona et Unió, 142.
Unió arcuatulus Bourguignat in Locard, 1889. Rév. Esp. frarnj. Margaritona et Unió, 138.
Unió amblyus Castro in Locard, 1889. Rév. Esp. frang. Margaritona et Unió, 119.
Unió almenarensis Drouet, 1893. Mém. Acad. Sci. Arts Bell. Lettr., Dijon (4): 4, 62, lám. 1, fig. 2.
Unió consentaneus var. moquini Germain, 1931. Faune de France: 22, 73, fig. 829.
Descripción original: Unió mancus Lamarck, 1819. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans vertebres, 6
Parte 1: 80.
Localidad tipo: Río Drée en Borgoña, Francia.
Ilustrado en: Dupuy, 1843. Essai sur les Mollusques terrestres et fluviátiles du département du Gers, 80,
figs. 1-2; Companyó y Massot, 1845. [Bulletin de la] Société Agricole, Scientifique et Littéraire des Pyré-
nées-Orientales, Perpignan: 6, 234-235, fig. 2; Rossmássler, 1854. lconographie der Land und Süsswasser
Mollusken, etc., 37, lám. 69, fig. 852.
Comentario taxonómico: De las 17
subespecies de la especie mediterránea
Unió elongatulus C. Pfeiffer, 1825 consid-
eradas por Haas (1940, 1969), solamente
dos se han citado en la península
Ibérica: U. elongatulus penchinatianus
Bourguignat, 1865, que viviría en los
ríos del noreste mediterráneo hasta el
Ebro, y U. elongatulus valentinus Ross-
mássler, 1854, en los ríos al sur del Ebro.
Una tercera subespecie, U. elongatulus
mancus Lamarck, 1819, cuya localidad
tipo es el río Drée, sólo se distribuiría
por Francia (Haas, 1969). Recientes
estudios (Araujo et al., 2005; Toledo et
al., datos no publicados) han
demostrado que las poblaciones del
Ebro y otros ríos mediterráneos ibéricos
más al norte, salvo alguna excepción
(ver comentario taxonómico de U.
ravoisieri), y las de U. e. valentinus,
pertenecen a la misma especie, que a su
vez es la misma que vive en el río Drée.
Es por eso que la especie ibérica debe
llamarse U. mancus Lamarck, 1819.
Es interesante comentar aquí que
una cuarta subespecie, U. elongatulus
aleroni Companyó y Massot, según
Haas (1969) exclusiva del sur Francia,
es también un sinónimo de U. mancus, lo
que se ha comprobado (Toledo et al.,
datos no publicados) analizando dos
genes mitocondriales de ejemplares del
río Basse (Sur de Francia), localidad tipo
de U. aleroni. La historia de la descrip-
ción de U. aleroni es muy curiosa, ya que
sus autores renegaron de la especie una
vez leídos los comentarios de Bour-
guignat (1866) sobre las deficiencias
que este autor achacó a su descripción
(ver Azpeitia, 1933 págs. 263-264). Bour-
guignat fue así el primero en advertir
que la especie de Companyó y Massot
era la misma que el U. mancus del
levante ibérico (el cual cita como U.
requieni), mientras que prácticamente al
mismo tiempo describía la especie U.
penchinatianus del lago de Bañólas
(Bourguignat, 1865), especie que en
Cataluña ha sido confundida con U.
aleroni, y que a su vez es un sinónimo
del taxón norteafricano U. ravoisieri
Deshayes, 1847 (ver comentario tax-
onómico de esta especie).
Altaba (1991) cita la presencia de
cuatro táxones diferentes de U. elongatu-
lus en los ríos del levante "catalán",
incluyendo U. e. aleroni. Salvo en el caso
del lago de Bañólas y del río Ser, en los
que se trata de U. ravoisieri, todas estas
citas pertenecen probablemente a U.
mancus.
33
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Distribución : En la península Ibérica
(Fig. 14) vive en los ríos de las cuencas
mediterráneas con un límite meridional
situado en la cuenca del Júcar. Hasta
que no se haga un estudio detallado de
todas las subespecies de U. elongatulus
consideradas por Haas (1969), se desco-
noce su distribución europea.
Es la única especie de Unió de la
cuenca del Ebro, donde vive con Poto-
mida littoralis, Anodonta anatina y Marga-
ritifera auricularia, y la más común en los
ríos del mediterráneo ibérico. También
se ha encontrado junto con U. ravoisieri
en el lago de Bañólas.
Morfología externa (Fig. 15): junto con
U. delphinus es la especie ibérica de Unió
más variable, ya que también presenta
caracteres externos diferentes según el
hábitat. Solamente por la concha es muy
difícil de distinguir de Unió elongatulus,
e incluso puede ser confundida con la
especie atlántica ibérica U. delphinus. Por
su distribución, solamente puede con-
fundirse con ejemplares simpátricos de
U. ravoisieri, pues los individuos de esta
especie que viven en ríos pueden ser
muy similares a los de U. mancus.
Forma muy variable, con ejemplares
de concha pequeña, muy fina y deli-
cada, hasta otros con concha muy
robusta. Presenta el aspecto típico de
mejillón o almeja de río con una concha
generalmente abombada y alargada de
coloración pardo-negruzca o pardo-
amarillenta con zonas más verdosas.
Concha inequilateral con la parte ante-
rior redondeada y la posterior alargada
y truncada, acabando en un corto pico.
Umbo prominente, redondeado y proso-
girado que en ocasiones puede presen-
tar escultura umbonal, simple u ondu-
lada, consistente en 2 filas de tubérculos,
una medial y otra posterior. El interior
de las valvas es blanco nacarado bri-
llante y presenta una línea paleal muy
marcada entre las cicatrices de los mús-
culos aductores anterior y posterior. El
ligamento que articula las dos valvas es
externo y discurre por el borde dorsal.
Valva izquierda con dos dientes poste-
riores de aspecto laminar y muy alarga-
dos y dos dientes cardinales crenulados,
muy pronunciados en los ejemplares
más alargados, que en ocasiones pueden
aparecer fusionados en una única
estructura laminar. La valva derecha
presenta un diente lateral posterior muy
alargado y un único diente cardinal que
puede resultar muy variable incluso
entre los ejemplares de una misma
población, donde se pueden observar
desde estructuras robustas y crenuladas
a formas más delicadas y de aspecto
laminar. El tamaño siempre es menor de
10 cm y raramente supera los 9 cm.
Sifón inhalante con papilas cónicas
típicas, a veces ramificadas (Figs. 5D,
16B).
Ciclo vital : En la cuenca del Ebro
Haas (1917) encontró ejemplares grávi-
dos entre los meses de julio y agosto,
mientras que Araujo et al. (2000)
observaron la liberación de gloquidios
entre los meses de marzo y octubre. En
experimentos realizados en acuarios la
emisión de gloquidios se produjo desde
final de abril hasta agosto. La cámara de
las branquias externas es la única que
actúa como marsupio para la incubación
de los gloquidios. Estos son blanqueci-
nos y triangulares y presentan un fuerte
gancho en el centro del borde ventral,
que aparece armado con numerosas
espículas (Figs. 6E, F). El tamaño medio
(medidos al microscopio electrónico) es
de 216,8 ¡um de longitud (ds=7,58; n=15),
193,3 jüm de altura (ds=13,31; n=13) y
162 jum de anchura (ds=l,99; n=2)
(Araujo et al., 2005).
(Página derecha) Figura 13. Esculturas umbonales. A: Potomida littoralis ; B: U. delphinus ; C: U.
gibbus-, D: U. tumidiformis ; E: U. ravoisieri ; F: Anodonta anatina.
(Pagina direita) Figura 13. Escultura do umbo. A: Potomida littoralis; B: U. delphinus; C: U.
gibbus; D: U. tumidiformis; E: U. ravoisieri; F: Anodonta anatina.
(Right page) Figure 13. Umbonal sculptures. A: Potomida littoralis; B: U. delphinus; C: U. gibbus;
D: U. tumidiformis; E: U. ravoisieri; F: Anodonta anatina.
34
i gj
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
35
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 14. Distribución de Unió mancus.
Figura 14. Distribuiqao de Unió mancus.
Figure 14. Distribution map o/XJnio mancus.
Experimentos realizados en labora-
torio (Araujo et al., 2005) han permi-
tido identificar hasta siete especies dife-
rentes de peces en los que los gloquidios
de U. mancus completan su metamorfo-
sis y que podrían por lo tanto actuar
como hospedadores de esta especie:
Barbus graellsii Steindachner, Barbus
haasi Mertens, Squalius pyrenaicus
(Günther), Squalius cephalus (L.), Chon-
drostoma miegii Steindachner, Phoxinus
phoxinus L. y Salaria fluviatilis (Asso). Se
han obtenido ejemplares juveniles en
141 grados /día. Las pruebas realizadas
con Cyprinus carpió L., Gobio gobio (L.) y
Acipenser baerii Brandt dieron buenos
resultados en la infestación, pero los
gloquidios se desprendieron antes de
completar su metamorfosis. En condi-
ciones naturales, tan sólo se han obte-
nido resultados positivos de infestación
con Barbus graellsii entre un total de siete
especies pescadas (Araujo et al., 2005).
Los gloquidios se fijan a las branquias
(90%) y aletas (10%).
Hábitat (Fig. 16A): Se trata de una
especie típicamente fluvial que, a excep-
ción de las zonas de alta montaña, es
capaz de ocupar todo tipo de tramos de
ríos, tanto de primer orden como de
afluentes menores, así como canales de
riego que mantengan sus fondos natura-
les. Aunque no es muy común, puede
aparecer también en grandes embalses
(Madeira, Araujo y Ayala, 2007), así
como en lagos (ej. Albufera de Valencia,
Bañólas). Vive generalmente semiente-
rrado en fondos de gravas bien asenta-
das de los brazos secundarios del río, en
el centro del cauce en zonas con poca
corriente y en los taludes bien conserva-
dos a la sombra de la vegetación de
ribera e incluso entre las raíces de los
árboles. Todos ellos hábitats fluviales
donde los peces hospedadores de sus
gloquidios pasan gran parte de su vida.
Sin embargo, también se han localizado
ejemplares en zonas de sustrato grueso
encajados entre piedras y rocas, en
fondos de fango y materia orgánica y en
36
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península
Figura 15. Unió mancus. A: río Brugent (Gerona); B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C: río
Ebro en Sástago (Zaragoza); D: acequia El Barranquet (Valencia); E: río Irati (Navarra).
Figura 15. Unió mancus. A: rio Brugent ( Gerona); B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C: rio
Ebro em Sástago (Zaragoza); D: vala El Barranquet (Valencia); E: rio Irati (Navarra).
Figure 15. Unió mancus. A: Brugent river ( Gerona); B: Canal Imperial de Aragón (Zaragoza); C: Ebro
river at Sástago (Zaragoza); D: El Barranquet ditch (Valencia); E: Irati river (Navarra).
37
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
playas de arena. Teniendo en cuenta la
distribución histórica de esta especie y
las características del agua donde se han
recogido ejemplares vivos, parece que
U. mancus es una especie propia de
aguas duras, con concentraciones de
calcio superiores a 100 mg/1. Aunque,
como la mayoría de las náyades,
requiere aguas limpias, puede vivir en
acequias de riego.
Conservación : Con el nombre de U.
elongatulus está amparada por las
siguientes figuras de protección: Direc-
tiva Hábitats (Anexo V): Especies ani-
males y vegetales de interés comunitario
cuya recogida en la naturaleza y cuya
explotación pueden ser objeto de
medidas de gestión. Convenio de Berna
(Anexo III): Especies protegidas que
pueden ser objeto de explotación contro-
lada, pero para las que está prohibido
utilizar los métodos de caza /captura
/ pesca que se mencionan en el anexo IV.
Catálogo Valenciano de Especies de
Fauna Amenazada (Anexo I): En peligro
de extinción. Catalogada en el Texto
refundido de la Ley de Protección de los
Animales de la Generalitat de Catalunya
en la categoría de Especies protegidas
de la fauna salvaje autóctona b. Inverte-
brados (Decreto legislativo 2/2008).
Dado que el nombre U. mancus se asigna
en la península Ibérica a las poblaciones
anteriormente conocidas como U. elon-
gatulus, toda la normativa que se aplica
a esta especie debe ahora asignarse a U.
mancus.
Como U. mancus está incluida en el
Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de
España en la categoría Casi amenazado
(Verdú y Galante, 2006).
Se trata de una especie en franca re-
gresión, especialmente en el tramo me-
dio del río Ebro, donde sus poblaciones
están disminuyendo de forma alar-
mante, siendo la segunda náyade me-
nos abundante después de M. auricula-
ria (Araujo, Madeira y Ayala, 2007).
Esta desaparición se debe a las afeccio-
nes antrópicas en el medio. También
está desapareciendo del resto de los ríos
mediterráneos ibéricos así como de la
Albufera de Valencia. Las poblaciones
de los principales canales que toman
agua del Ebro (Imperial de Aragón y de
Tauste) parecen ser las más abundantes
y estructuradas, con presencia regular
de ejemplares juveniles (Gómez y
Araujo, 2008). La principal amenaza
que actualmente se cierne sobre estas
poblaciones son los cortes de agua que
se suceden regularmente a lo largo del
año. En primer lugar, porque en ocasio-
nes se vacían demasiado los canales,
siendo frecuentes la aparición de zonas
en seco tanto en el centro del cauce
como en los taludes; de este modo, los
ejemplares que se encuentran en esas
zonas quedan expuestos al aire libre en
épocas en las que además son frecuen-
tes las heladas, con lo que se pueden
producir episodios de mortalidad. Y
por otro lado, estos cortes de agua pro-
vocan la desaparición de los peces, que
se van al río por los batideros, reducién-
dose así las posibilidades de contacto
entre náyades y peces. Además, a estas
alteraciones del hábitat hay que su-
marle la presencia en los canales de
grandes densidades de especies de mo-
luscos exóticos invasores (mejillón ce-
bra -Dreissena polymorpha- y almeja asiá-
tica -Corbicula fluminea ) que pueden
agravar más la situación de esta espe-
cie. Por todo ello, se recomienda su in-
clusión en el nuevo Catálogo Español
de Especies Amenazadas en la Catego-
ría de Vulnerable.
(Página derecha) Figura 16. Náyades vivas. A, B: Unió mancus ; C, D: U. delphinus ; E, F: Anodonta
anatina.
(Pagina direita) Figura 16. Náiades vivas. A, B: Unió mancus; C, D: U. delphinus; E, F: Anodonta
anatina.
(Right page) Figure 16. Living naiads. A, B: Unió mancus; C, D: U. delphinus; E, F: Anodonta
anatina.
38
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
39
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 17. Distribuido de Unió gibbus.
Figure 17. Distribution map 0/TJnio gibbus.
Unió gibbus Spengler, 1793
Sinónimos:
Unió turdetanus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 66-67; lam. I, fig. 4.
Unió tifleticus Pallary, 1923. Bull. Soc. se. Natur. Maroc, 78. Figurado en Pallary, 1927. J. de Conchyl.:
71, lám. 7, figs. 1-2.
Unió (Limniun) foucauldiana Pallary, 1936. J. de Conchyl.: 63-64, lám. 4, fig. 2.
Unió ( Limniun ) seurati Pallary, 1936. J. de Conchyl. : 64-65, lám. 4, fig. 1.
Descripción original: Unió gibbus Spengler, 1793. Skrifter afNaturhistorie Selskabet, Kjobenhavn, 3 (1):
64.
Localidad tipo: Tranquebar, India. Sin duda un error (ver más abajo). Holotipo en el Zoological
Museum of the University of Copenhagen. N°: ZMUC BIV-434.
Ilustrado en: Haas, 1913: Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I Kjobenhavn,
65: 60, fig. 6; Knudsen et al, 2003: Steenstrupia, T7 (2): 274, fig. 12. Ambas referencias ilustran el
holotipo.
Comentario taxonómico: Curiosa-
mente, Spengler (1793), que es quien
describe la especie U. gibbus, indica que
el ejemplar tipo procede de Tranquebar
(India), pero ya Haas (1913) advierte el
error e indica que su procedencia es
España y que se trata de la misma
especie que el U. turdetanus de Drouet
(1893). Años más tarde, el mismo Haas
(1969) considera tanto U. gibbus como U.
turdetanus entre las sinonimias de U. pic-
torum delphinus, uno de los 13 taxa en los
que este autor dividió U. pictorum, pero
recientemente se ha demostrado que se
trata de una especie distinta (Araujo et
al., 2009a).
En cuanto a las otras sinonimias de
U. gibbus, Unió tifleticus fue sorprenden-
40
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 18. A-C: Unió gibbus, río Barbate (Cádiz). B: ejemplar juvenil.
Figura 18. A-C: Unió gibbus, rio Barbate (Cádiz). B: juvenil.
Figure 18. A-C: Unió gibbus, Barbate river (Cádiz). B: juvenile specimen.
41
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
temente sinonimizado por Haas (1969),
y posteriormente por Daget (1998), con
Potomida littoralis fellmani (Deshayes), la
"raza" norteafricana de P. littoralis. Y en
cuanto a Unió ( Limniun ) foucauldiana y
Unió ( Limniun ) seurati, han sido conside-
rados por Daget (1998) sinónimos del
taxon norteafricano U. elongatulus
durieui Deshayes, uno de los 17 taxa en
los que Haas (1969) separó la especie
mediterránea U. elongatulus C. Pfeiffer;
no obstante, Haas (1969) no consideró
en su libro ninguno de estos dos taxa.
Distribución: Ríos atlánticos del sur
de la península Ibérica y Marruecos
(Araujo et al., 2009a), también en los
ríos del Mediterráneo marroquí, Argelia
y Túnez. En la península (Fig. 17) sólo se
han localizado ejemplares vivos en el río
Barbate (Cádiz).
Drouet (1893) cita U. turdetanus en el
arroyo salado cerca de Morón en Sevilla,
donde no ha podido encontrarse por ha-
berse modificado totalmente el hábitat.
Pallary (1923, 1927, 1936) cita Unió tifle-
ticus en el río Tiflet (cuenca del Sebou)
Marruecos, Unió (Limniun) foucauldiana
en el río Sous, al sur de Agadir (Marrue-
cos) y Unió ( Limniun ) seurati en Chélif
(Argelia). Se han encontrado ejemplares
de esta especie procedentes de Argelia
en la colección del Museo Nacional de
Historia Natural de Paris (Francia) y se
ha tenido conocimiento de la presencia
actual de la especie en ríos de Túnez
(com. pers. Noureddine Khalloufi).
Morfología externa (Fig. 18): Concha
ligeramente inflada, de silueta oval a
redondeada y generalmente elevada en
su parte dorsal posterior. La silueta
recuerda a la de Potomida littoralis, sobre
todo los ejemplares juveniles. Parte
anterior redondeada en forma de arco
de círculo y parte posterior también
redondeada pero elevada en la región
dorsal formando una quilla en la zona
del ligamento. Concha delgada y ligera,
con el periostraco en ocasiones desfle-
cado en las zonas posterior y ventral de
las valvas. Color verduzco (especial-
mente en los ejemplares marroquíes) o
pardo, a menudo con bandas radiales
más claras. Umbos redondeados y pro-
minentes, nunca erosionados, y de color
más claro que el resto de la concha. Se
puede observar el gloquidio en el ápice
del umbo a modo de protoconcha.
Escultura umbonal (Fig. 13C) consis-
tente en 2 ó 3 filas de fuertes tubérculos
paralelos a las líneas de crecimiento de
la concha, más patente en los ejemplares
ibéricos. En los ejemplares juveniles los
tubérculos posteriores se extienden en
una línea diagonal que no se observa en
los adultos. Valva izquierda con dos
dientes pseudocardinales laminares, a
menudo crenulados, que pueden estar
juntos o separados, el posterior apun-
tado y más elevado, y dos dientes lami-
nares laterales posteriores de longitud
variable, el inferior siempre más
elevado. Valva derecha con un diente
pseudocardinal normalmente apuntado
y plano y uno lateral posterior muy alto.
Longitud máxima 85,6 mm.
Papilas del sifón inhalante (Fig. 5F)
de forma cónica y distribuidas en varias
filas, a veces ramificadas.
Ciclo de vida : En el río Barbate las
hembras están grávidas al final de fe-
brero. Sin embargo, en Marruecos se
han visto hembras con gloquidios ma-
duros a principios de junio (Araujo et
al., 2009a). En los ejemplares españoles
toda la cámara de las branquias externas
actúa como marsupio, pero en algunos
ejemplares marroquíes se ha visto que
las cámaras de ambas branquias pueden
llenarse con gloquidios, algo excepcio-
nal en el género Unió. Los gloquidios
(Página derecha) Figura 19. Gloquidios. A, B: U. gibbus ; C, D: U. delphinus ; E, F: U. tumidifor-
mis-, G. H. Anodonta anatina.
(Pagina direita) Figura 19. Gloquidios. A, B: U. gibbus; C, D: U. delphinus; E, F: U. tumidiformis;
G, H: Anodonta anatina.
(Right page) Figure 19. Glochidia. A, B: U. gibbus; C, D: U. delphinus; E, F: U. tumidiformis; G,
H: Anodonta anatina.
42
ARAUJO ET AL.\ Las náyades de la península Ibérica
43
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 20. Distribución de Unió delphinus.
Figura 20. Distribuigao de Unió delphinus.
Figure 20. Distribution map ofXJ nio delphinus.
(Figs. 19A, B) en la población marroquí
estudiada son triangulares, algo redon-
deados, con forma intermedia entre los
propios de Unió y Potomida. Borde del
gloquidio cubierto de pequeños abulta-
mientos cuyo tamaño va aumentando
hacia la parte ventral de la concha, aun-
que parece que sin llegar a formar las
espículas y ganchos típicos del género.
No obstante, en ejemplares de Túnez se
ha visto que los gloquidios sí presentan
gancho ventral (Khalloufi com. pers.)
Dimensiones medias de los gloquidios
(medidos al microscopio electrónico):
longitud: 209.17 pm (ds = 2.83; n = 19),
altura: 211 ¡um (ds = 3.93; n = 21), an-
chura: 67.67 jum (ds = 5.99; n = 3).
Se desconocen las especies de peces
que pueden servir de hospedadores
para sus gloquidios.
Hábitat: En fondos de arena y grava.
Bajo la sombra de árboles en riberas y
taludes. También entre piedras en zonas
de rápidos. En España convive con Poto-
mida littoralis, Unió delphinus y Anodonta
anatina, mientras que en Marruecos se
ha encontrado junto con Unió delphinus
y Potomida sp.
Conservación: Dado que solamente se
conoce de una localidad, U. gibbus es
ahora mismo la especie de náyade más
amenazada no sólo de la península
Ibérica sino también de Europa.
Además, dicha población ha sufrido
muy recientemente gravísimos episo-
dios de sequía que han podido mermar
sus efectivos. Existen evidencias de que
antes del drenado y desecación de la
antigua laguna de la Janda (Cádiz), el
hábitat de U. gibbus se extendía por una
extensión mayor que la actual.
Pese a que su reconocimiento como
especie válida es muy reciente, ya está
catalogada (con el nombre de Unió sp.)
en la categoría de En Peligro en el Libro
Rojo de los invertebrados de Andalucía
(Barea et al., 2008). Se recomienda su
inclusión urgente en el nuevo Catálogo
Español de Especies Amenazadas en la
categoría En Peligro.
44
Araujo ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
linio delphinus Spengler, 1793
Sinónimos:
Unió hispanus Moquin-Tandon in Rossmássler, 1844. Iconogr. Land Sussw. Molí., 2: 26, lám. 56, fig.
747.
Unió dactylus Morelet, 1845. Molí, terr.fluv. Portugal, 110, lám. 14, fig. 2.
Unió mucidus Morelet, 1845. Descr. Molí. Portugal, 111, lám. 14, fig. 3.
Unió lusitanus Drouet, 1879. J. de Conch., Paris, 327.
Unió hyperephanus Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. malac. France, Paris, 2: 289.
Unió nevesi Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. malac. France, Paris, 2: 291.
Unió simoesi Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. malac. France, Paris, 2: 292.
Unió schousboei Bourguignat in Locard, 1889. Conchyliol. portug., 250.
Unió subhispanus Castro in Locard, 1889. Conchyliol. portug., 244.
Unió cameratus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 45, lám. 2, fig. 8.
Unió limosellus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 46, lám. 2, fig. 4.
Unió decurtatus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 47, lám. 1, fig. 9.
Unió gravatus Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 49, lám. 2, fig. 6.
Unió chorellus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 227.
Unió barbozanus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 233.
Unió ocresanus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 236.
Unió chasmirhynchus Castro in Locard 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 246.
Unió mundanus Castro in Locard 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 247.
Unió euchasmus Castro in Locard 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 249.
Unió tameganus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 221.
Unió oncomensis Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 225.
Unió hypoxanthus Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 226.
Unió chorellinus Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 228.
Unió submucidus Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 230.
Unió castroi Bourguignat in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 234.
Unió silvai Bourguignat in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 235.
Unió paulinoi Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 242.
Unió taganus Servain in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 252.
Unió abrantesianus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 253.
Unió scalabisianus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 254.
Unió allenianus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 255.
Unió cyrtus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 257.
Unió sousanus Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 258.
Unió novus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 258.
Unió neothaumus Castro in Locard, 1899. Conchyliol. portug., 259.
Unió requienii taginus Kobelt, 1903. Iconogr. Land Sussw. Molí, (2) 11: 28, lám. 279, fig. 1796.
Descripción original: Unió delphinus Spengler, 1793. Skrifter af Naturhistorie Selskabet, Kjobenhavn,
3(1): 63.
Localidad tipo: Tranquebar, India. Sin duda un error (ver más abajo). Sintipo en el Zoological
Museum of the University of Copenhagen. N°: ZMUC BIV-433.
Ilustrado en: Haas, 1913. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening I Kjobenhavn,
65: 59, fig. 5; Knudsen et al, 2003. Steenstrupia, 73
sintipo.
Comentario taxonómico: Como en el
caso de U. gibbus, Spengler (1793)
indica que el ejemplar tipo de U. delphi-
nus procede de Tranquebar (India), pero
una vez más Haas (1913) advierte el
error y asegura que su procedencia es
España y que se trata de la misma
(2): 273-274, fig. 11. Ambas referencias ilustran el
especie que el U. hispanus de Moquin
Tandon. Años más tarde, el mismo
Haas (1969) considera tanto U. delphinus
como U. hispanus entre las sinonimias de
U. pictorum delphinus, uno de los 13 taxa
en los que este autor dividió U. picto-
rum, pero recientemente se ha demos-
45
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 21. Unió delpbinus. A: arroyo Landrinos (Toledo); B: lagunas de Ruidera (Albacete); C:
embalse de Gasset (Ciudad Real); D: río Odelouca (Beja); E: río Guadalporcún (Sevilla).
Figura 21. Unió delphinus. A: ribeira Landrinos (Toledo); B: lagoas de Ruidera (Albacete); C: albu-
feira de Gasset (Ciudad Real); D: rio Odelouca (Beja); E: rio Guadalporcún (Sevilla).
Figure 21. Unió delphinus. A: Landrinos srteam (Toledo); B: Ruidera lagoons (Albacete); C: Gasset
impoundment (Ciudad Real); D: Odelouca river (Beja); E: Guadalporcún river (Sevilla).
46
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 22. Unió delphinus. A: río Deza (Pontevedra); B: juvenil del embalse de Gasset (Ciudad Real).
Figura 22. Unió delphinus. A: rio Deza (Pontevedra); B: juvenil da albufeira de Gasset ( Ciudad
Real).
Figure 22. Unió delphinus. A: Deza river (Pontevedra); B: juvenile from the Gasset impoundment
( Ciudad Real).
47
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
trado que U. delphinus es una especie
diferente del U. pictorum europeo (Reís
ET AL., en rev.).
De los 13 taxa en que Haas (1969)
divide la especie U. pictorum, solamente
dos se distribuyen por la península Ibérica,
U. pictorum mucidus Morelet, 1845 y U. pic-
torum delphinus Spengler, 1793, y ambos
corresponden a U. delphinus. También es
esta especie la que se ha citado en la penín-
sula Ibérica como Unió pictorum (L. 1757)
(Vidal Abarca y Suárez, 1985) o más
recientemente, como U. cf. pictorum (Reís,
2006; Reís et al., en rev.).
Distribución: Ríos atlánticos de la
península Ibérica y Marruecos. En la
península (Fig. 20) es la especie de Unió
más común y distribuida por estos ríos.
Morfología externa (Figs. 21, 22): es una
de las especies de Unió más variables, pre-
sentando caracteres externos diferentes
según el hábitat, lo que explica el gran
número de sinónimos que tiene. Sola-
mente por los caracteres de la concha es
muy difícil de distinguir de la especie Unió
pictorum que vive en el resto de Europa, e
incluso puede ser confundido con la
especie mediterránea española U. mancus,
así como con otros taxones relacionados
(por ej. U. elongatulus) (Araujo et al.,
2005). Concha de silueta oval, general-
mente alargada, aunque algunas pobla-
ciones pueden presentar ejemplares redon-
deados o incluso de silueta casi rectangu-
lar. Parte anterior corta y redondeada, la
posterior más alargada. En las cuencas de
aguas moderadamente duras o duras el
borde dorsal desciende bruscamente hacia
la parte posterior, formando un ángulo
marcadamente agudo (característica
común en las poblaciones al sur del Tajo).
En las cuencas de aguas blandas el borde
dorsal es alto y la parte posterior redon-
deada, como en algunos ejemplares de
Unió tumidiformis (característica común al
norte del Tajo) y que correspondería al
Unió mucidus de Morelet, 1845. Concha
sólida, de color amarillo verdoso a marrón
muy oscuro. Umbos redondeados, gene-
ralmente planos pero a veces prominen-
tes, muy erosionados cuando viven en
aguas ácidas. La escultura del umbo (Fig.
13B) consiste en tubérculos paralelos a las
líneas de crecimiento de la concha y no
siempre es bien visible. Valva izquierda
con dos dientes pseudocardinales crenu-
lados que pueden estar juntos en un solo
diente o separados, y dos dientes latera-
les laminares, el inferior más alto. Valva
derecha con un diente pseudocardinal casi
siempre crenulado, un engrosamiento
supracardinal (situado entre el borde
dorsal de la concha y el diente pseudo-
cardinal), exclusivo de esta especie, y un
diente lateral posterior laminar. Los pseu-
docardinales de ambas valvas pueden ser
muy robustos. Longitud máxima de la
especie 10 cm.
Papilas del sifón inhalante (Figs. 5E,
16D) de forma cónica y distribuidas en
varias filas.
Ciclo de vida: Se reproduce en verano.
En el sur de la península (Río Barbate,
Cádiz) se han visto hembras grávidas (con
huevos) en febrero. La presencia de
embriones y gloquidios maduros suele
ocurrir entre mayo y julio en toda su área
de distribución, desde Marruecos hasta el
norte de España. En todos los ejemplares
estudiados el marsupio se limita a toda la
cámara de las branquias externas. Los glo-
quidios (Figs. 19C, D) son triangulares con
un fuerte gancho ventral adornado con
espículas. Dimensiones máximas de los
gloquidios: (medidos con microscopio
electrónico): longitud: 229 ¡um, altura: 213
jum, anchura: 151,8 pm.
Se desconocen los peces hospedado-
res de sus gloquidios, aunque teniendo
en cuenta su amplia distribución y el
rango de hospedadores de especies pró-
ximas como Unió pictorum y Unió
mancus (Berrie y Boize, 1985; Araujo et
al., 2005), debería incluir varias especies
comunes en los ríos atlánticos de la
península, por ejemplo: Barbus spp.,
Chondrostoma spp. (s.l.), Gasterosteus acu-
leatus L. y Squalius spp. entre otras.
Hábitat (Fig. 16C): En todo tipo de
ríos y arroyos con agua permanente.
Más común en riberas y taludes de
arena bajo la sombra de los árboles, pero
también en fondos de grava y cieno y en
orillas soleadas. Puede aparecer en lagos
(ej. Ruidera) y rara vez en embalses.
En ríos de aguas temporales suelen
quedar poblaciones aisladas en las
pozas que mantienen agua durante el
48
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
estiaje donde se mantienen refugiadas
junto con los peces.
Conservación : Con el nombre de U.
pictorum o U. cf. pictorum, está catalo-
gado como Casi Amenazado en el Libro
Rojo de los Invertebrados de España
(Verdú y Galante, 2006), De Interés
Especial en el Catálogo Regional de
Especies Amenazadas de Castilla-La
Mancha y Vulnerable en el Catálogo
Gallego de Especies Amenazadas y en el
Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de
Andalucía (Barea et al., 2008).
Aunque es la especie de Unió más
común de los ríos atlánticos de la penín-
sula Ibérica, está en regresión, y sus
poblaciones están desapareciendo de
muchas localidades (Rolán, 1998; Reís,
2006; Soler et al., 2006; Velasco y
Romero, 2006; Barea et al., 2008).
Dado que la tasa actual de desapari-
ción de las náyades es catastrófica, y que
cada vez son mayores las afecciones
sobre los ríos donde habita U. delphinus
(tanto naturales -sequías, riadas-, como
artificiales -detracciones de agua, embal-
ses, eutrofización-), se recomienda su
inclusión en el nuevo Catálogo Español
de Especies Amenazadas en la Catego-
ría de Vulnerable.
Unió tumidiformis Castro, 1885
Sinónimos:
Unió batavus sensu Morelet, 1845. Descript. des Molí. ten. et fluviat. du Portugal, 109 (non Unió
crassus batavus Matón and Rackett, 1807).
Unió sadoicus Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. Malac. France, París, 2: 284.
Unió macropygus Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. Malac. France, París, 2: 286.
Unió eupygus Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. Malac. France, París, 2: 287.
Unió baeticus Kobelt, 1887. Iconogr. Land Sussw. Molí, (2) 8: 55, lám. 89, fig. 495.
Unió conimbricus Kobelt, 1893. Iconogr. Land Sussw. Molí, (2) 6: 99, lám. 180, fig. 1133.
Unió callypigus Drouét, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 65, lám. 2, fig. 2.
Descripción original: Unió tumidiformis Castro, 1885. Bulletin de la Société Malacologique de France,
París, 2: 283.
Localidad tipo: Río Sado, Portugal. Sintipos en el Museu Zoológico Dr. Augusto Nobre, Porto, Por-
tugal (2 ejemplares, colección Castro, lote N° 47) y en el Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle,
París, Francia (21 ejemplares. Colección Locard, lote MNHN 20839).
Ilustrado en: Reis y Araujo (2009).
Comentario taxonómico: Esta especie
ha sido identificada como Unió crassus
batavus Matón and Rackett, 1807
(Morelet, 1845; Azpeitia, 1933; Haas,
1940, 1969) o más recientemente como
Unió cf. crassus (Reís, 2006; Reís et al.,
en rev.), pero se ha demostrado que se
trata de una especie exclusiva de la
península Ibérica (Reís y Araujo, 2009)
distinta del U. crassus que vive en el
resto de Europa.
Distribución: Ríos atlánticos del suro-
este de la península Ibérica (Reís y
Araujo, 2009). Actualmente sólo se
conocen poblaciones en 3 cuencas hidro-
gráficas (Fig. 23): Guadiana, Mira y
Sado. No obstante, existe alguna cita en
las cuencas del Tajo, Guadalquivir y
Mondego. Aunque su presencia actual
en el Guadalquivir fuera posible, en el
Tajo y el Mondego es más improbable.
Morfología externa (Fig. 24): Es la
náyade ibérica que presenta la concha
de menores dimensiones en estado
adulto (longitud máxima: 60 mm).
Puede confundirse en algunos casos con
Unió delphinus, pero un análisis deta-
llado de sus caracteres puede revelar la
diferencia entre ambas especies. Concha
muy ancha, como indica su nombre
tumidiformis, de forma oval, general-
mente alargada, pero no tanto como en
Unió delphinus, y con una proporción
longitud/ anchura raras veces superior a
2,5. Parte anterior muy corta y redonde-
ada, la posterior alargada y alta, termi-
49
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 23. Distribución de Unió tumidiformis.
Figura 23. Distribuido de Unió tumidiformis.
Figure 23. Distribution map of\3 nio tumidiformis.
nando generalmente en una conexión
redondeada entre el borde dorsal y
ventral. En algunas poblaciones (por ej.
en el río Sado, Portugal y en las lagunas
de Ruidera, España) el borde dorsal pos-
terior algo descendente formando un
ángulo agudo. Concha de color amarillo
verdoso a marrón muy oscuro, general-
mente con unas rayas radiales amarillas,
verdes o rojizas muy bien marcadas.
Umbos redondeados y prominentes. La
escultura del umbo (Fig. 13D) consiste
en una serie de fuertes pliegues con
forma de "w" paralelos a la longitud de
la concha y apenas visibles cuando el
umbo se encuentra erosionado. Valva
izquierda con dos dientes pseudocardi-
nales crenulados y dos dientes laterales
laminares, el inferior más alto. Valva
derecha con un diente pseudocardinal
casi siempre crenulado y algo curvo, con
la concavidad hacia el borde dorsal de la
concha, y un diente lateral posterior
laminar.
Papilas del sifón inhalante (Fig. 5G) de
forma cónica y distribuidas en varias filas.
(Página derecha) Figura 24. Unió tumidiformis. A: río San Pedro (Beja); B, C: lagunas de Ruidera
(Albacete); D: río Guadalmez (Ciudad Real); E: río Vascao (Beja/Faro); F: río Milagro (Ciudad
Real); G: río Guadaira (Sevilla).
(Pagina direita) Figura 24. Unió tumidiformis. A: rio Sao Pedro (Beja); B, C: lagoas de Ruidera
(Albacete); D: rio Guadalmez ( Ciudad Real); E: rio Vascao (Beja/Faro); F: rio Milagro ( Ciudad Real);
G: rio Guadaira (Sevilla).
(Right page) Figure 24. Unió tumidiformis. A: San Pedro river (Beja); B, C: Ruidera lagoons (Alba-
cete); D: Guadalmez river ( Ciudad Real); E: Vascao river (Beja/Faro); F: Milagro river ( Ciudad Real);
G: Guadaira river (Sevilla).
50
ArauJO ETAL.\ Las náyades de la península Ibérica
51
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 25. Distribución de Unió ravoisieri.
Figura 25. Distribuigao de Unió ravoisieri.
Figure 25. Distribution map of\Jmo ravoisieri.
Ciclo de vida : Se reproduce en verano.
La presencia de embriones y gloquidios
maduros suele ocurrir entre abril y julio
en toda su área de distribución (Reís y
Araujo, 2009). En la población del río
Vascáo (cuenca del Guadiana, Portugal)
se han encontrado gloquidios entre
marzo y agosto de 2007. En todos los
ejemplares estudiados el marsupio se
limita a toda la cámara de las branquias
externas. Los gloquidios (Figs. 19E, F)
son triangulares, con un fuerte gancho
ventral adornado con espículas. Dimen-
siones máximas de los gloquidios:
(medidos con microscopio electrónico):
longitud: 202 jum, altura: 158 pm,
anchura: 144 jim (Reís y Araujo, 2009).
Se han probado diferentes especies
de peces como potenciales hospedado-
res en experimentos en cautividad, pero
sólo se han obtenido juveniles con ejem-
plares del género Squalius: S. alburnoides
(Steindachner), S. aradensis (Coelho,
Bogutskaya, Rodrigues y Collares-
Pereira), S. carolitertii (Doadrio), S. pyre-
naicus (Günther) y S. torgalensis (Coelho,
Bogutskaya, Rodrigues y Collares-
Pereira). Cualquier especie atlántica per-
teneciente a este género parece ser un
buen hospedador para los gloquidios de
Unió tumidiformis, independientemente
de que ocurra naturalmente en simpa-
tría con el bivalvo.
Hábitat : Generalmente en ríos de
orden mediano con régimen de tipo
mediterráneo temporal. En riberas y
taludes de arena y cieno con vegetación
bajo la sombra de los árboles. Puede
aparecer en lagos (ej. Ruidera).
En épocas de estiaje de los ríos
suelen quedar poblaciones aisladas en
las pozas que mantienen agua donde se
refugian junto con los peces. El resto del
año suele vivir muy enterrada en el
cieno o la arena.
Conservación: Catalogada como Vul-
nerable en el Libro Rojo de los Inverte-
brados de Andalucía (Barea et al.,
2008). Con el nombre de ü. crassus está
catalogada como Vulnerable en el Libro
52
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Rojo de los Invertebrados de España
(Verdú y Galante, 2006). El nombre U.
tumidiformis sustituye en la península
Ibérica a U. crassus, especie incluida en
los anexos II y IV de la Directiva
Hábitat, por lo que mantiene este esta-
tuto de protección hasta que se revise la
Directiva.
Unió tumidiformis presenta varias
características que justifican una aten-
ción particular para su conservación: 1.
Es una especie endémica limitada en la
actualidad a las cuencas del Guadiana,
Mira y Sado. 2. Sus poblaciones se
encuentran muy dispersas y aisladas,
estando formadas en ocasiones por muy
pocos ejemplares. 3. En toda su área de
distribución la sequía presenta una
amenaza creciente capaz de eliminar
rápidamente las poblaciones. De hecho,
se conoce por lo menos una población
que hasta 2005 contaba con miles de
ejemplares y reclutamiento de juveniles
que ha desaparecido casi por completo
tras la sequía de dicho año.
Se recomienda su inclusión en el
Catálogo Español de Especies Amenaza-
das en la categoría de Vulnerable.
Unió ravoisieri Deshayes, 1847
Sinónimos
Unió moreleti Deshayes, 1847. Hist. Molí. Algérie, lám. 109, figs. 1-4.
Unió penchinatianus Bourguignat, 1865. Molí. nov. litig. peu connus, 2 série (XVII): 342-343, lám. 21,
figs. 1-7.
Unió tafnanus Kobelt, 1884. Iconogr. Land-Sussw. Molí., (2)1: 66, lám. 28, fig. 216.
Unió ravoisieri var. isserica Kobelt, 1884. Iconogr. Land-Sussw. Molí., (2)1: 65, lám. 28, fig. 215.
Unió medjerdae Kobelt, 1886. Iconogr. Land-Sussw. Molí., (2)2: 23, lám. 42, fig. 257-259.
Unió micelii Kobelt, 1886. Iconogr. Land-Sussw. Molí., (2)2: 24, lám. 43, fig. 260-261.
Unió delevieleusae Hagenmüller in Bourguignat, 1887. Prodr. Malacol. Tunisie; 162.
Unió doumeti Bourguignat, 1887. Prodr. Malacol. Tunisie ; 163.
Descripción original: Unió ravoisieri Deshayes, 1847. Histoire naturelle des mollusques. In: Exploration
scientifique de T Algérie. París, lám. 108, figs. 4-7.
Localidad tipo: Lago Oubeira, La Calle (hoy El Kelaa), Argelia.
Ilustrado en: Deshayes, 1847. Histoire naturelle des mollusques. In: Exploration scientifique de V Algérie,
lám. 108, figs. 4-7; Bourguignat, 1864. Malacologie de T Algérie, lám. 20, figs. 5-10; Bourguignat, 1865.
Mollusques noveaux, litigieux ou peu connus, 2 série (XVII), lám. 21, figs. 1-7.
Comentario taxonómico : La especie U.
ravoisieri ha sido considerada por Haas
(1969) como especie modelo del taxon
norteafricano Unió pictorum ravoisieri
Deshayes, pero probablemente se trata
de una especie más próxima al grupo
elongatulus que al grupo pictorum ( sensu
Haas).
Por otra parte, Haas (1969) dividió
la especie mediterránea U. elongatulus
en 17 taxa diferentes, uno de los cuales,
U. elongatulus penchinatianus Bourguig-
nat, viviría en los ríos del noreste de Es-
paña hasta el Ebro (éste incluido) y el
lago de Bañólas. Recientes estudios (To-
ledo et al., datos no publicados) demues-
tran que dentro de este taxon se inclu-
yen dos especies diferentes: U. mancus
(en los ríos mediterráneos ibéricos, ver
comentario taxonómico de U. mancus) y
U. ravoisieri (en la cuenca del Fluviá y el
lago de Bañólas). Hemos comprobado
que esta última especie, descrita por
Bourguignat como U. penchinatianus en
Bañólas, ya había sido previamente des-
crita por Deshayes en ríos argelinos con
el nombre de U. ravoisieri.
Altaba (1991) cita U. e. penchinatia-
nus como especie endémica del lago de
Bañólas, pero no considera la presencia
de U. mancus en esta localidad. Tampoco
Haas (1916) en su estudio sobre las
náyades de dicho lago consideró la pre-
sencia de dos especies diferentes de
Unió. Hoy sí sabemos que en Bañólas U.
ravoisieri y U. mancus viven juntas y no
son siempre fáciles de distinguir por su
aspecto externo. Por ello, Araujo et al.
53
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
(2005) consideraron la cita de Altaba
(1991) una posible confusión con U.
mancus. Unió ravoisieri ha sido también
confundida (Altaba, 1991; Comas y
Mallarach, 2004) con U. aleroni. Como
ya se ha comentado, los recientes análi-
sis moleculares de ejemplares de la loca-
lidad tipo de U. aleroni (río Basse al sur
de Francia), han confirmado que se trata
de ejemplares de U. mancus (Toledo et
al., datos no publicados).
Distribución: En la península Ibérica
(Fig. 25) restringida al lago de Bañólas y
cuenca del Fluviá, donde se conoce del
río Ser (Toledo et al., datos no publica-
dos). Se desconoce si las citas de U. ale-
roni de la cuenca del Llobregat (Comas y
Mallarach, 2004) pertenecen en reali-
dad a U. ravoisieri o a U. mancus.
Es una especie común en el norte de
África al este del río Moulouya (Argelia
y Túnez).
Morfología externa: Los ejemplares
del río Ser (Fig. 26A) presentan una con-
cha muy fina, pequeña, siempre alar-
gada y comprimida, de color pardo, a
menudo verde o incluso amarillento,
con los anillos de crecimiento externos
muy juntos. Bordes dorsal y ventral pa-
ralelos, el dorsal a veces ligeramente as-
cendente hacia la región posterior. Um-
bos planos, muy poco prominentes. Es-
cultura del umbo (Fig. 13E) formada por
dos filas de tubérculos a menudo muy
marcados y picudos, aunque no siempre
presente (puede faltar incluso en ejem-
plares con el umbo no erosionado). Rara
vez mayor de 60 mm aunque hay ejem-
plares hasta de 95 mm. Una de las prin-
cipales características de esta especie es
la forma redondeada del borde antero-
dorsal de la concha, que dibuja un arco
muy patente, aunque este carácter se en-
cuentra también en algunas poblaciones
de U. mancus. Ligamento fino. Charnela
muy débil y delgada, con los dientes
pseudocardinales pequeños y laminares,
los de la valva izquierda generalmente
fusionados en uno.
La forma de las conchas de los ejem-
plares de Bañólas (Fig. 26B) es bastante
diferente, como suele ocurrir con las po-
blaciones que viven en lagos (ej. U. tumi-
diformis de las Lagunas de Ruidera). Ta-
maño muy grande (hasta 105 mm), con
la concha mucho más espesa, inflada y
sólida que en los ejemplares de río, y de
color pardo amarillento, nunca verde. La
región posterior aparece siempre cu-
bierta de creta (Haas, 1916). Silueta cua-
drangular muy característica, con el
umbo retrasado, de forma que la parte
anterior es muy corta y la posterior muy
alargada. Charnela y ligamento muy de-
sarrollados; dientes pseudocardinales
muy fuertes, aserrados y separados en la
valva izquierda. Escultura del umbo si-
milar a la de los ejemplares de río.
En sus localidades ibéricas, U. ravoi-
sieri solamente puede confundirse con
Unió mancus. En el lago de Bañólas las
dos especies son bastante difíciles de
distinguir por sus caracteres externos.
Papilas del sifón inhalante (Fig. 5H)
de forma cónica y distribuidas en varias
filas.
Ciclo de vida: Las branquias externas
de las hembras del río Ser aparecen car-
gadas de huevos entre los meses de
junio y julio. Se desconoce la morfología
del gloquidio y sus posibles peces hos-
pedadores, aunque se han citado las
especies Barbus meridionalis Risso y Leu-
ciscus cephalus L. (Generalitat de Cata-
lunya, 2004). En ríos de Túnez se ha
visto que la liberación de las larvas se
produce en marzo.
Hábitat: En fondos de grava y cieno
de los cursos medianos y bajos de ríos
pequeños y poco profundos. General-
mente muy escondido, clavado en las
riberas y taludes a la sombra, también
entre las raíces de los árboles. En el lago
de Bañólas muy enterrado en el sedi-
mento del fondo.
Conservación: Al tener una distribu-
ción tan restringida, la salud de sus
poblaciones depende de la de las pocas
masas de agua donde habita. Además,
es una especie muy poco abundante y
muy difícil de localizar. La población
del lago de Bañólas requiere también
una protección urgente ante la amenaza
de desaparición fundamentalmente por
la sustitución de peces nativos por peces
exóticos. Se recomienda su inclusión en
el nuevo Catálogo Español de Especies
Amenazadas en la Categoría En Peligro.
54
AEAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 26. Unió ravoisieri. A: río Ser (Gerona); B: lago de Bañólas (Gerona).
Figura 26. Unió ravoisieri. A: rio Ser ( Gerona); B: lago de Bañólas ( Girona).
Figure 26. Unió ravoisieri. A: Ser river ( Gerona); B: Bañólas lake ( Gerona).
55
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 27. Distribuido de Anodonta cygnea.
Figure 27. Distribution map Ío/Anodonta cygnea.
Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sinónimos: El número de sinonimias de A. cygnea se cuenta por cientos. Haas (1969) por ejem-
plo, cita 542. El problema es que tanto en este caso como en el listado de sinonimias que da
SlMPSON (1900), también se incluyen las correspondientes a la otra especie europea A. anatina.
Debido a esta dificultad y para evitar mayor confusión, solamente asignamos los sinónimos
que hemos podido comprobar a partir de la iconografía (Schróter, 1779; Drouet, 1893; Az-
peitia, 1933) y de la consulta de los sintipos conservados en el Museu Zoológico Dr. Augusto
Nobre (Porto, Portugal) y en el Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (París, Francia).
Mya arenaria Schróter, 1779 (non Linnaeus, 1758). Gesch. Flussconch .: 165, lám. 2, fig. 1.
Anodonta oblonga Millet, 1833. Mém. Soc. Agrie. Sci. Angers, 1 (3): 242, lám. 12, fig. 1.
Anodonta gallica Bourguignat, 1881. Matér. Molí. Acéph. Syst. Europ., 123.
Anodonta enhydra Castro, 1885. Bull. Soc. Malac. France, París, 2: 279.
Anodonta apala Castro in Locard, 1899. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon, 7: 265.
Anodonta pelophila Castro in Locard, 1899. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon, 7: 268.
Descripción original: Mytilus cygneus Linnaeus, 1758. Systema Naturae, 10. Aug.: 706, Nr. 218.
Ilustrado en: Lister, 1678. Historiae Animalium Angliae, etc, London, T. 2, fig. 29; Lister, 1685. Appen-
dicis ad Historiam Animalium Angliae, London, figs. 2 y 3; Lister, 1770. Historiae sive sinopsis methodi-
cae Conchyliorum et, Oxford, T. 153, fig. 8; Gualtieri, 1742. Index testarum Conchyliorum quae adser-
vantur in Museo Nicolai Guialtieri, etc, Florencia, T. 7, fig. F; Schróter, 1779. Die Geschichte der Flüss-
conchylien, etc. Halle, lám. 2, fig. 1; Rossmássler, 1836. Iconographie der Land und Süsswasser Mollus-
ken, IV:l-27, lám. 19, fig. 280.
Comentario taxonómico : La especie A. polimórficas y difíciles de distinguir.
cygnea ha sido confundida innumerables Aunque Haas (1969) consideró que en
veces con A. anatina, siendo ambas muy Europa, y por lo tanto en la península
56
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Ibérica, sólo había una especie de Ano-
donta, A. cygnea, esto no es cierto.
Existen varias ilustraciones de esta
especie anteriores a su descripción. No
obstante, gracias a Hanley (1855) sabe-
mos que el ejemplar ilustrado por
Rossmássler (1836, pl. 19, fig. 280)
como A. cygnea var. Cellensis es idéntico
al tipo descrito por Linneo como A. cyg-
nea. Curiosamente, Rossmássler (1836)
incluye como primera sinonimia de esta
especie a Mytilus cellensis Schróter, 1779,
t. 2, fig. 1, pero hemos comprobado,
como probablemente ya hizo Bourguig-
nat (1881, en Azpeitia, 1933), que
Schróter (1779) en ningún momento
describe esa especie en su libro. No obs-
tante, es necesario añadir que en la ci-
tada figura de Schróter (1779) sí se
ilustra una auténtica A. cygnea pero con
el nombre de Mya arenaria L.
Distribución: Las únicas poblaciones
que se conocen en la península Ibérica
(Fig. 27) están en las lagunas litorales de
agua dulce del centro de Portugal entre
Aveiro y Coimbra (Reís, 2006). En el año
2008 también se localizaron ejemplares
en la laguna de Arbucies (Gerona),
aunque han debido desaparecer tras las
obras realizadas para su modernización
(Araujo, obs. pers.). Probablemente esta
especie no se distribuye de forma natural
en la península Ibérica y su presencia es
debida a la introducción de ejemplares o
de peces infectados con gloquidios proce-
dentes de Europa central (Reís et al., en
rev.), ya que las lagunas donde ha apare-
cido son hábitats muy modificados por el
hombre. No obstante, existen dos citas
antiguas de la especie que parecen
fiables: una en el río Mondego (Locard,
1899), en el extremo sur de su zona de
ocurrencia actual, y otra en el río Palmo-
nes (Cádiz), en el sur de la península
Ibérica (Azpeitia, 1933). Aparte de éstas y
otras citas de Castro (1873) y Locard
(1899) en las lagunas donde existe actual-
mente y en la vecina laguna de Ervedal,
otras citas que se puedan localizar en la
bibliografía se refieren a A. anatina.
Morfología externa (Figs. 28, 29):
Concha muy grande, hasta 170 mm, y
muy frágil, sin dientes en la charnela.
Color pardo amarillento a verduzco.
Aunque puede ser fácilmente confun-
dida con A. anatina, es más alargada y
con los bordes dorsal y ventral muy
rectos y paralelos. Borde posterior gene-
ralmente muy alargado, a veces en pico.
La escultura del umbo, cuando está pre-
sente, se limita a una serie de estrías
concéntricas elevadas que siguen el
dibujo de las líneas de crecimiento,
siendo a veces discontinuas y a veces
bifurcadas y discurriendo de borde a
borde del umbo, lo que la distingue de
A. anatina, cuya escultura, aunque
similar, es siempre ondulada y a
menudo no alcanza los bordes de la
concha (Kennard, Salisbury y Wood-
ward, 1925). Otras dos características de
A. cygnea son el umbo muy plano, de
forma que éste nunca es visible mirando
la concha por la cara interna, y el liga-
mento largo y oculto.
Ciclo de vida: En la única población
ibérica estudiada todos los ejemplares
son hermafroditas y liberan los gloqui-
dios en primavera (Lima, com. pers.).
Solamente las branquias externas actúan
como marsupio. Es una especie "long-
term brooder", es decir, que mantiene
los gloquidios en las branquias durante
todo el invierno. En Inglaterra los glo-
quidios maduros aparecen en otoño y
son retenidos en la branquia materna
hasta la próxima primavera (WóóD,
1974; Aldridge, 1999), como también
ocurre en Italia (Giusti, Castagnolo,
Moretti y Renzoni, 1975).
El gloquidio de A. cygnea es grande
(longitud 350 ¡um, altura 350 jum) y
triangular, con una característica espina
en forma de gancho en el ápice ventral
que a su vez está armada de numerosas
espículas en toda su longitud (Nagel,
1999; Hoggarth, 1999). Los gloquidios
se fijan a los peces en los filamentos
branquiales, opérculos, boca, ojos y ale-
tas, fundamentalmente entre los meses
de noviembre y mayo. Los peces hospe-
dadores conocidos son: Gasterosteus acu-
leatus L, Atherina boyeri Risso, Tinca tinca
L., Lepomis gibbosus L., Perca fluviatilis L.
y Esox lucius L. (Wood, 1974; Giusti et
al., 1975; Dartnall y Wakey, 1979), de
los que sólo los tres primeros son autóc-
tonos de la península Ibérica.
57
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 28. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
Figura 28. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
Figure 28. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
58
ARAUJO ET AL. : Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 29. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
Figura 29. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
Figure 29. Anodonta cygnea. Pateira de Ferméntelos, Aveiro.
59
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 30. Distribución de Anodonta anatina.
Figura 30. Distribuido de Anodonta anatina.
Figure 30. Distribution map o/Amodonta anatina.
Hábitat : En la península sólo se ha
encontrado en lagunas de aguas poco
profundas (menos de 5 metros), donde
vive semi-enterrada en un cieno muy
fino y distribuida prácticamente por
toda la superficie del fondo.
Conservación : Catalogada en la catego-
ría de Casi Amenazada en el Libro Rojo
de los Invertebrados de España (Verdú y
Galante, 2006) y en la de Datos Insufi-
cientes en el Libro Rojo de los Invertebra-
dos de Andalucía (Barea et al., 2008).
Antes de proponer alguna medida de
conservación para esta especie es necesa-
rio averiguar si se distribuye de forma
natural por la península Ibérica.
Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Sinónimos: Como ocurre con la especie anterior, el número de sinonimias de A. anatina es eleva-
dísimo, estando además generalmente mezclados los sinónimos de esta especie con los de A.
cygnea. Debido a esta y otras dificultades (ver apartado Comentario taxonómico), y para evitar
mayor confusión, solamente consideramos como sinónimos válidos las especies ibéricas que
hemos podido comprobar a partir de la iconografía (Drouet, 1893; Azpeitia, 1933).
Anodonta regularis Morelet, 1845. Descript. des Molí. ten. et fluviátiles du Portugal, 100, lám. X, fig.
única.
Anodonta macilenta Morelet, 1845. Descript. des Molí. ten. et fluviátiles du Portugal, 102, lám. XI, fig.
única.
Anodonta lusitana Morelet, 1845. Descript. des Molí. ten. et fluviátiles du Portugal, 103, lám. XII, fig. 1.
Anodonta submacilenta Servain, 1880. Étude sur les Mollusques recueillis en Espagne et en Portugal,
162.
Anodonta martorelli Servain 1880. Étude sur les Mollusques recueillis en Espagne et en Portugal, 166.
Anodonta viriata Servain, 1880. Étude sur les Mollusques recueillis en Espagne et en Portugal, 169.
60
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Anodonta carvalhoi Castro, 1883. Contribut. a lafaune malacologique du Portugal, 20.
Anodonta wenceslai Castro, 1883. Contribut. a lafaune malacologique du Portugal, 26.
Anodonta lusoiana Castro, 1883. Contribut. a lafaune malacologique du Portugal, 31.
Anodonta calderoni Kobelt, 1887. Anal, de la Soc. Esp. de Hist. Nat., t. XVI: 438.
Anodonta baetica Kobelt, 1887. Anal, de la Soc. Esp. de Hist. Nat., t. XVI: 439.
Anodonta glaucina Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 40, lám. I, fig. 1.
Anodonta latirostris Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 69, lám. I, fig. 8.
Anodonta mollis Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 70, lám. II, fig. 7.
Anodonta adusta Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 75, lám. I, fig. 3.
Anodonta prasina Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 79, lám. II, fig. 9.
Anodonta nobilis Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 80, lám. II, fig. 5.
Anodonta bicolor Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 81, lám. I, fig. 5.
Anodonta valentina Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 84, lám. II, fig. 3.
Anodonta emacerata Drouet, 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne, 85, lám. II, fig. 1.
Descripción original: Mytilus anatinus Linnaeus, 1758. Systema Naturae, 10. Aug.: 706, Nr. 219.
Ilustrado en: Schróter, 1779. Die Geschichte der Flüssconchylien, etc. Halle, lám. 1, figs. 1, 2 y 3; lám.
3, fig. 1; Rossmássler, 1837. Iconographie der Land und Süsswasser Mollusken, V-VI, lám. 30, figs.
416-420.
Comentario taxonómico: Un problema
importante referido al tipo de A. anatina
es que según el libro de Hanley (1855),
el ejemplar con el que Linneo describió
la especie pertenece a Anodonta compla-
nata (Ziegl. in Rossmássl. Iconog. Pt. iv.
Pl. 20, f. 283). Efectivamente, tanto en la
ilustración de Hanley (1855, pl. 2, fig. 1)
como en la de Rossmássler (1836) se
comprueba que se trata de la especie
Pseudanodonta y no de Anodonta. Esto
podría indicar que el nombre de Mytilus
anatinus L. no se correspondería con A.
anatina sino con Pseudanodonta compla-
nata Rossmássler 1835. No obstante,
dado que no existe la certeza de que los
ejemplares que cita (e ilustra) Hanley
(1855) coincidan exactamente con los
ejemplares originales de Linneo
(Dance, 1967), y para evitar mayores
complicaciones, sugerimos las ilustra-
ciones de Schróter (1779) y Rossmáss-
ler (1837) como las representativas de
A. anatina.
Además, la especie A. anatina ha
sido confundida innumerables veces
con A. cygnea, siendo ambas muy poli-
mórficas. Aunque Haas (1969) consi-
deró que A. anatina era un sinónimo de
A. cygnea, hoy sabemos que son especies
diferentes. También es necesario
avanzar que los recientes estudios utili-
zando marcadores moleculares indican
la existencia de lo que podrían ser varias
especies dentro de lo que se ha conside-
rado A. anatina en la península Ibérica, y
que a su vez podrían ser también dife-
rentes de la especie que vive en el resto
de Europa. Si esto fuera así, la especie (o
especies) ibéricas tendrían nombres
diferentes de A. anatina. Para evitar
mayores complicaciones y en espera de
obtener resultados definitivos, conside-
ramos A. anatina en la península Ibérica
como una sola especie igual a la pre-
sente en el resto de Europa.
Distribución: Por toda la península
Ibérica (Fig. 30), en ríos, embalses y
lagos. Es la especie de Anodonta más
común.
Morfología externa (Figs. 31, 32, 33):
Especie muy polimórfica, más que su
congénere A. cygnea. Concha muy frágil,
sin dientes en la charnela. Puede llegar a
ser muy grande y abombada depen-
diendo del hábitat que ocupa. Color
pardo o negro, a veces verde. Los ejem-
plares juveniles (Figs. 31B, C) suelen ser
muy aplanados y presentar un dibujo de
franjas radiales más claras. Silueta gene-
ralmente oval o cuadrangular, en ocasio-
nes alargada pero nunca tanto como A.
cygnea. En proporción suele ser siempre
más alta que ésta. Habitualmente pre-
senta un ala dorsal o cresta en la parte
posterior más patente en los ejemplares
juveniles. Ligamento más marcado y
prominente que en A. cygnea. Borde
ventral generalmente curvo. El borde
dorsal puede ser curvo o recto, dibu-
61
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 31. Anodonta anatina. Río Ebro. A: adulto; B, C: juveniles.
Figura 31. Anodonta anatina. Rio Ebro. A: adulto; B, C: juvenis.
Figure 31. Anodonta anatina. Ebro river. A: adult; B, C: juvenile shells.
62
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Figura 32. Anodonta anatina. Embalse de Bornos (Cádiz).
Figura 32. Anodonta anatina. Albufeira de Bornos ( Cádiz).
Figure 32. Anodonta anatina. Bornos impoundment ( Cádiz).
63
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 33. Anodonta anatina. A: río Milagro (Ciudad Real); B: ejemplar deforme del Río Ebro.
Figura 33. Anodonta anatina. A: rio Milagro ( Ciudad Real); B: exemplar deformado do Rio Ebro.
Figure 33. Anodonta anatina. A: Milagro river ( Ciudad Real); B: deformed specimen from the Ebro
river.
64
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
jando, en este segundo caso, los lados de
un triángulo: uno anterior que asciende
hasta el vértice del ala y uno posterior
que desciende bruscamente. Umbo
plano y ancho, más saliente que en A.
cygnea. La escultura del umbo (Fig. 13F),
cuando está presente, es siempre ondu-
lada, concéntrica y a menudo no alcanza
los bordes de la concha (Kennard et
al., 1925).
Papilas del sifón inhalante (Figs. 51,
16F) de forma cónica y distribuidas en
varias filas, prácticamente idénticas a las
del género Unió.
Ciclo de vida : Al igual que A. cygnea
es una especie "long-term brooder" que
mantiene los gloquidios en las bran-
quias durante todo el invierno. Sola-
mente la branquia externa actúa como
marsupio. Los gloquidios maduran en
otoño y se liberan en primavera (Pekka-
rinen Y Englund, 1995; Aldridge,
1999; Panini, Sicuro, Daprá y Forne-
ris, 2009). Son de color pardo amari-
llento, y tanto su aspecto general (Figs.
19G, H) como su tamaño (longitud: 350-
360 ¡um, altura: 340-360 jum) son simila-
res a los de A. cygnea. La única caracte-
rística útil para diferenciarlos es la
superficie de la concha, que en A.
anatina presenta un dibujo de finas costi-
llas dorso ventrales formando un retí-
culo (Pekkarinen y Englund, 1995;
Hoggarth, 1999).
Aunque se trata de una especie
dioica, recientemente se ha visto que
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Hay muchas personas a las que agra-
decer tanto la donación de ejemplares, las
informaciones que nos han cedido o su
ayuda en las campañas de muestreo: D.
Bragado, E. Rolán, D. Moreno, J. Balset, J.
García del Castillo, R. Romero, A. Calvo,
C. Durán, M. A. Ramos, M. Álvarez
Cobelas, R. Álvarez Halcón, A. Martínez-
Ortí, J. Altimiras, R. Reyes, J. M. Remón,
E. Peñín, P. Santos, A. I. Negro, F. J. Fer-
nández y Fernández-Arroyo, J. Fernán-
dez Pujol, A. Balmori, J. Serradilla, R.
Alia, T. Vega, A. Uriarte, J. M. García
Verdes, J. M. García, F. Chico, R. Gonzá-
pueden existir ejemplares hermafroditas
(Panini et al., 2009).
Entre las especies hospedadoras de
sus gloquidios en la península Ibérica se
han señalado Barbus graellsii Stein-
dachner, Chondrostoma miegii Stein-
dachner. Salaria fluviatilis (Asso), Gobio
gobio (L.), Squalius pyrenaicus (Günther)
y S. cephalus (L.) (Gómez, obs. pers.). En
otros países (Pekkarinen y Hastén,
1998) se han citado los peces Perca fluvia-
tilis L., Gymnocephalus cernuus L.,
Puntius tetr azona (Bleeker) y la larva de
la salamandra Ambystoma tigrinum
Green.
Hábitat (Figs. 16E, F): En todo tipo de
ríos, también en lagos (ej. Ruidera,
Albufera de Valencia). En los embalses
suele ser la única náyade presente.
Habitualmente en fondos blandos de
cieno y aguas remansadas, aunque
también puede vivir en gravas y zonas
de corriente. Es una de las náyades
menos exigentes en cuanto al hábitat,
probablemente por tener un amplio
rango de peces hospedadores.
Conservación : Catalogada como Casi
Amenazada en el Libro Rojo de los
Invertebrados de España (Verdú y
Galante, 2006) y en el Libro Rojo de los
Invertebrados de Andalucía (Barea et
al., 2008).
Aunque es necesario proteger sus
poblaciones, parece tener una mayor
valencia ecológica que el resto de espe-
cies de náyades ibéricas.
lez Dávila, A. Agirre, A. Torralba, J.
Viñuela, J. Sánchez-Matas, J. A. Garrido
García, M. Vila Farré, J. J. Bafaluy, J.
Arlanzón, G. Latorre, A. Alarcos, E. Mon-
telío, A. Camiña, C. García García, J.
López Hernando, J. Lozano, C. J. Pollo, E.
Bassols, J. Nebot, F. Uribe, J. Soler, M.
Larraz, D. Boix, K. Nagel, M. Campos, D.
Cruz, T. Romero, E. Forner, J. V. Escobar,
Jesús (Piscifactoría El Palmar), J. P. Poin-
tier, J. Abad, F. García Quiroga.
También queremos mostrar nuestro
agradecimiento a los diferentes departa-
mentos de medio ambiente de las comu-
65
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
nidades autónomas españolas y al Insti-
tuto de Conservagáo da Natureza de
Portugal por los permisos concedidos
para poder muestrear, a todo el personal
de dichos departamentos que nos han
ayudado, así como a los guardas de
medio ambiente del Ayuntamiento de
Zaragoza y a la Confederación Hidro-
gráfica del Ebro.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Aldridge D.C. 1999. The morphology, growth
and reproduction of Unionidae (Bivalvia) in
a fenland waterway. Journal ofMolluscan Stu-
dies, 65: 47-60.
Altaba C.R. 1990. The last known population
of the freshwater mussel Margaritifera auri-
cularia (Bivalvia, Unionoida): A conserva-
tion priority. Biological Conservation, 52: 271-
286.
Altaba C.R. 1991. Les náyades (Mollusca: Bi-
valvia: Unionoida) deis Paisos Catalans. But-
lletíde la Institució Catalana d'História Natural,
60 (Secció de Zoologia, 9): 23-44.
Altaba C.R. 1997. Al límit de l'extinció: Mar-
garitifera auricularia (Bivalvia, Unionoida).
Butlletíde la Institució Catalana d'História Na-
' tumi, 65: 137-148.
Álvarez-Claudio C., García Rovés P., Ocha-
rán R., Cabal J.A., Ocharán F.J. y Álva-
rez M.A. 2000. A new record of the fresh-
water pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera
L. (Bivalvia: Unionoida) from the River Nar-
cea (Asturias, north-western Spain). Aquatic
Conservation. Marine and Freshwater Ecosys-
tems, 10: 93-102.
Araujo R. 2008. On the validity of the ñame Po-
tomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798) (Bivalvia: Unio-
nidae). Graellsia, 64 (1): 135-137.
Araujo R., Bragado D. y Ramos M.A. 2000. Oc-
currence of glochidia of the endangered Mar-
garitifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793) and ot-
her mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida) in
drift and on fishes in an ancient channel of
the Ebro River, Spain. Archivfür Hydrobiolo-
gie, 148 (1): 147-160.
Araujo R., Bragado D. y Ramos M.A. 2001.
Identification of the river blenny. Salaria flu-
viatilis, as a host to the glochidia of Margar-
itifera auricularia. Journal ofMolluscan Studies,
67: 128-129.
Araujo R., Cámara N. y Ramos M.A. 2002.
Glochidium metamorphosis in the endan-
gered freshwater mussel Margaritifera auri-
cularia (Spengler, 1793): A histological and
scanning electrón microscopy study. Journal
of Morphology, 254: 259-265.
Las fotografías de las conchas las ha
realizado Fernando Señor y las láminas
las ha compuesto Fernando Muñoz,
ambos del departamento de fotografía
del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Natura-
les (CSIC). Las fotos de "scanning" se
hicieron en el microscopio de barrido
del mismo Museo por Laura Tormo y
Marta Furió.
Araujo R., Gómez. I. y Machordom A. 2005.
The identity and biology of Unió mancus La-
marck, 1819 (= U. elongatulus ) (Bivalvia: Unio-
nidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of
Molluscan Studies, 71 (1): 25-31.
Araujo R., Madeira M.J. y Ayala I. 2007. Es-
tudio del estado actual de Margaritifera auri-
cularia en las aguas del río Ebro. Confederación
Hidrográfica del Ebro. 72 pp.
Araujo R. y Moreno R. 1999. Former Iberian
distribution of Margaritifera auricularia (Spen-
gler) (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae). Iberus, 17
(1): 127-136.
Araujo Rv Quirós M. y Ramos M.A. 2003.
Laboratory propagation and culturing of ju-
veniles of the endangered freshwater mus-
sel Margaritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793).
Journal of Conchology, 38 (1): 53-60.
Araujo R. y Ramos M.A. 1998. Description of
the glochidium of Margaritifera auricularia
(Spengler, 1793) (Bivalvia, Unionidae). Phi-
losophical Transactions of The Roy al Society of
London B, 353: 1553-1559.
Araujo R. y Ramos M.A. 2000a. A critic revi-
sión of the historical distribution of Marga-
ritifera auricularia (Spengler, 1793) (Mollus-
ca: Margaritiferidae) based on museum
specimens. Journal of Conchology, 37 (1): 49-
59.
Araujo R. y Ramos M.A. 2000b. Status and
conservation of the relict giant European
freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera auri-
cularia (Spengler, 1793). Biological Conserva-
tion, 96 (2): 233-239.
Araujo R. y Ramos M.A. 2001. Action Plan for
Margaritifera auricularia and M. margariti-
fera. Convention on the Conservation of Eu-
ropean Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern
Convention). Council of Europe Publishing.
Nature and environment. No. 117. Stras-
bourg. 66 pp.
Araujo R., Toledo C. y Machordom A.
2009a. Redescription of Unió gibbus Spen-
gler, 1793, a west palaearctic freshwater
mussel with hookless glochidia. Malacolo-
gia, 51: 131-141.
66
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Araujo R., Toledo C, Van Damme D., Gha-
mizi M. y Machordom A. 2009b. Margariti-
fera marocana (Pallary, 1918) a valid current
species inhabiting the Moroccan rivers. Jour-
nal ofMolluscan Studies, 75: 95-101.
Augspurger T., Keller A.E., Black M., Cope
W. Y Dwyer F.J. 2003. Water quality gui-
dance for protection of freshwater mussels
(Unionidae) from ammonia exposure. Envi-
ronmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22 (11):
2569-2575.
Azpeitia F. 1933. Conchas bivalvas de agua dulce
de España y Portugal. Memorias del Instituto
Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid. 2 vol.
763 pp + 36 lám.
Barea-Azcón J.M., Ballesteros-Duperón E.
y Moreno D. (coords.). 2008. Libro Rojo de los
Invertebrados de Andalucía. 4 Tomos. Conse-
jería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalu-
cía, Sevilla. 1430 pp.
Bauer G. 1983. Age structure, age specific mor-
tality rates and population trend of the fresh-
water pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margari-
tifera ) in North Bavaria. Archiv für Hydrobi-
ologie, 98 (4): 523-532.
Bauer G. 1987a. The parasitic stage of the fresh-
water pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margari-
tifera L.) II. Susceptibility of brown trout.
Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement 76 (4):
403-412.
Bauer G. 1987b. The parasitic stage of the fresh-
water pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margari-
tifera L.) III. Host relationships. Archiv für
Hydrobiologie, Supplement 76 (4): 413-423.
Bauer G. 1987c. Reproductive strategy of the
freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera mar-
garitifera. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56: 691-
704.
Bauer G. 1992. Variation in the life span and
size of the freshwater pearl mussel. Journal
of Animal Ecology, 61: 425-436.
Bauer G. 1994. The adaptative valué of offs-
pring size among freshwater mussels (Bi-
valvia; Unionoidea). Journal of Animal Ecology,
63: 933-944.
Bauer G. 1997. Host relationships at reversed
generation times: Margaritifera (Bivalvia) and
Salmonids. En Dettner et al. (Eds.): Vertical
food Web Interactions y Springer-Verlag.
Berlin y Heidelberg, Ecological Studies, Vol.
130: 69-79.
Bauer G. 2001. Life-history variation on diffe-
rent taxonomic levels of naids. En Bauer, G.
y Wachtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology and Evolu-
tion of the freshwater mussels Unionoida.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Ecologi-
cal Studies, Vol. 145: 83-91.
Bauer G. y Vogel C. 1987. The parasitic stage
of the freshwater pearl mussel ( Margaritifera
margaritifera L.) I. Host response to Glochidio-
sis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Supplement 76
(4): 393-402.
Bech M. y Altimiras J. 2003. Nuevas aporta-
ciones al conocimiento de los moluscos ac-
tuales y del cuaternario en Extremadura: I.
Malacofauna dulceacuícola. Revista de Estu-
dios Extremeños, 59 (2): 837-870.
Berrie A.D. y Boize B.J. 1985. The fish hosts of
Unió glochidia in the River Thames. Interna-
tionale Vereinigung fuer Theoretische und An-
gewandte Limnologie Verhandlungen, 22: 2712-
2716.
Bogan A.E. 1993. Freshwater bivalve extinc-
tions (Mollusca: Unionoida): A search for
causes. American Zoologist, 33: 599-609.
Bogan E. 2008. Global diversity of freshwater
mussels (Mollusca, Bivalvia) in freshwater.
Hydrobiologia, 595: 139-147.
Bourguignat M.J.R. 1865. Mollusques nou-
veaux, litigieux ou peu connus. Revue et Ma-
gasin de Zoologie puré et appliquée, XVII: 6-23
+ 24 pl.
Bourguignat M.J.R. 1866. Mollusques nou-
veaux, litigieux ou peu connus. Revue et Ma-
gasin de Zoologie puré et appliquée, XVIII: 337-
347.
Bouza C., Castro J., Martínez P., Amaro R.,
Fernández C., Ondina P., Outeiro A. y
San Miguel E. 2007. Threatened freshwater
pear mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in
NW Spain: low and very structured genetic
variation in Southern peripheral populations
assessed using microsatellite markers. Con-
servation Genetics, 8: 937-948.
Castro J.S. 1873. Mollusques terrestres et flu-
viátiles du Portugal. Espéces nouvelles ou
peu connues. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas,
Physicas e Naturaes, IV (N.° 15).
Castro J.S. 1885. Unionidae nouveaux du Por-
tugal. Bulletin de la Société Malacologique de
France, 2: 277-294.
Castro J.S. 1887. Contributions á la faune ma-
lacologique du Portugal. I - Anodontes du
Portugal. Jornal de Sciencias Mathematicas,
Physicas e Naturaes, 35: 121-152.
Comas E. y Mallarach J.M. 2004. Una nova
població de náiades (Unió aleroni) a la conca
del Llobregat. Butlletí de la Institució Catalana
d'Historia Natural, 72: 113-114.
Companyo M. Y Massot P. 1845. Description
d'une espéce nouvelle de Mulette. [Bulletin
de la] Société Agricole, Scientifique et Littéraire
des Pyrénées-Orientales, Perpignan, 6: 234-235
+ 1 lam.
Cosgrove P., Hastie L. y Sime I. 2007. Recor-
ded natural predation of freshwater pearl
mussels Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) in Sco-
tland. Journal of Conchology, 39: 469-472.
DagetJ. 1998. Catalogue raisonné des Mollusques
bivalves d'eau douce africains. Backhuys Pub-
lishers/ Orstom. 329 pp.
Dance S.P. 1967. Report on the Linnean shell
collection . Proceedings of the Linnean Society of
London, 178 (1): 1-24 + 10 pl.
67
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Dartnall H.J.G. y Walkey M. 1979. The dis-
tribution of glochidia of the swan mussel,
Anodonta cygnea (Mollusca) on the three-
spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus
(Pisces). Journal of Zoology, London, 189: 31-
37.
Delvene G. y Araujo R. 2009a. Early Cretace-
ous non-marine bivalves from Spain. Journal
oflberian Geology, 35 (1): 19-34.
Delvene G. y Araujo R. 2009b. Protopleuro-
bema: a new genus of freshwater bivalve from
the Lower Cretaceous of the Cameros basin
(NW Spain). Journal oflberian Geology, 35 (2):
169-178.
Drouet H. 1893. Unionidae de l'Espagne. Mé-
moires de l'Académie de Dijon, IVe série (4): 5-
89 + 2 lam.
Dupuy A. 1847. Histoire Naturelle des Mollus-
ques terrestre et d'eau douce qui vivent en France.
737 pp + 31 lam.
Ellis D. 1978. British freshwater bivalve mollusca.
Synopses ofthe British fauna (new series), 11.
The Linnean Society of London y Academic
Press, London. 110 pp.
Geist J. y Auerswald K. 2007. Physicochemi-
cal stream bed characteristics and recruit-
ment of the freshwater pearl mussel ( Mar -
garitifera margaritifera). Freshwater Biology, 52:
2299-2316.
Geist J. y Kuehn R. 2005. Genetic diversity and
differentiation of Central European fresh-
water pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margari-
tifera L.) populations: implications for con-
servation and management. Molecular Eco-
logy, 14: 425-439.
Geist J., Porkka M. y Kuehn R. 2006. The sta-
tus of host fish populations and fish species
richness in European freshwater pearl mus-
sel ( Margaritifera margaritifera) streams.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and freshwater
ecosystems, 16: 251-266.
Generalitat de Catalunya 2004. Projecte d'es-
tudi i recuperado de ndiades (Unió aleroni) del
Pare Natural de la zona volcánica de la Garrotxa.
Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de
Medi Ambient i Habitatge. Pare Natural de
la Zona Volcánica de la Garrotxa: 1-8.
Germain L. 1931. Mollusques terrestres etfuvia-
tiles. Faune de France 21-22. Faculté des Scien-
ces, Paris. 897 pp + 26 lam.
Guisti F. 1973. The minute shell structure of
the glochidium of some species of the
genera Unió, Potomida and Anodonta
(Bivalvia, Unionacea). Malacologia, 14: 291-
301.
Giusti F., Castagnolo L., Moretti L. y Ren-
zoni A. 1975. The reproductive eyele and
the glochidium of Anodonta cygnea L. from
Lago Trasimeno (Central Italy). Monitore Zo-
ológico Italiano (N. S.), 9: 99-118.
Gómez I. y Araujo R. 2008. Channels and dit-
ches as the last shelter for freshwater mus-
seis. The case of M. auricularia and other
naiads at the mid Ebro River basin, Spain.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater
Ecosystems, 18: 658-670.
Graf D. 2007. Paleartic freshwater mussel (Mo-
llusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) diversity and
the comparative method as a species con-
cept. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia, 156: 71-88.
Graf D. y Cummings K. 2006. Palaeoheterodont
diversity (Mollusca: Trigonioida + Unio-
noida): what we know and what we wish we
knew about freshwater mussel evolution.
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 148:
343-394.
Graf D. y Cummings K. 2007. Review of the sys-
tematics and global diversity of freshwater
mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal
ofMolluscan Studies 73: 291-314.
Grande C., Araujo R. y Ramos M.A. 2001.
The gonads oí Margaritifera auricularia (Spen-
gler, 1793) and Margaritifera margaritifera (L.
1758) (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Journal ofMo-
lluscan Studies, 67: 27-35.
Haas F. 1909. Ueber Unió auricularius Spen-
gler. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozo-
ologischen Gesellschaft, 2: 20-25.
Haas F. 1910. Pseudunio, neues genus für Unió
sinuatus Lam. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen
Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, 42: 181-183.
Haas F. 1913. Bemerkungen über Spenglers
Unionen. Videnskabelige Meddelelserfra Dansk
Naturhistorisk Forening I Kjobenhavn, 65: 51-66
+ 3 tab.
Haas F. 1916. Les naiades del llac de Banyoles
i llur importancia teórica. Publicacions de L'Ins-
titut de Ciencies. Treballs de l'Institució Catalana
d'Historia Natural, 1916: 15-23.
Haas F. 1917a. Estudio para una monografía de
las náyades de la península Ibérica. Anuari
de la Junta de Ciencies Naturals, 2: 131-190.
Haas F. 1917b. Estudio sobre las náyades del
Ebro. Boletín de la Sociedad Aragonesa de Cien-
cias Naturales, 16: 71-82.
Haas F. 1940. A tentative classification of the
Palearctic Unionids. Field Museum of Natural
History, Zoological Series, 24: 115-141.
Haas F. 1941. Records of large fresh-water mus-
seis. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoolog-
ical Series, 24: 259-270.
Haas F. 1969. Superfamilia Unionacea. Das Tie-
rreich, 88: 1-663.
Hanley S. 1855. Ipsa Linnaei conchylia. The shells
ofLinnaeus, determined from his manuscripts and
collection. London. 556 pp + 5 pl.
Harms W. 1907. Zur Biologie und Entwick-
lungsgeschichte der Flussperlmuschel (Mar-
garitana margaritifera Dupuy). Zoologischer
Anzeiger, 31: 814-824.
68
Araujo ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Harms W. 1909. Postembryonale Entwic-
klungsgeschichte der Unioniden. Zoologis-
che Jahrbücher. Abteilungfür Anatomie und On-
togenie der Thiere, 28: 325-386.
Hastie L., Young M., Bonn P., Cosgrove P. y
Henninger B. 2000a. Sizes, densities and
age structures of Scottish Margaritifera mar-
garitifera (L.) populations. Aquatic Conserva-
tion: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystem, 10: 229-
247.
Hastie L., Young M. y Boon P. 2000b. Growth
characteristics of freshwater pearl mussel
Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Freshwater Bi-
ology, 43: 243-256.
Hastie L.C. y Young. M.R. 2003. Timing of
spawning and glochidial release in Scottish
freshwater pearl mussel ( Margaritifera mar-
garitifera) populations. Freshwater Biology, 48:
2107-2117.
Hendelberg J. 1961. The freshwater pearl-mus-
sel. On the location, age, and growth of the
individual and on the composition of the po-
pulation according to an investigation in
Parlálven in Artic Sweden. Report of the Ins-
titute of Freshwater Reseach Drottningholm, 41:
149-171.
Hoggarth M.A. 1999. Descriptions of some of
the glochidia of the Unionidae (Mollusca:
Bivalvia). Malacologia, 41 (1): 1-118.
Huff S.W., Campbell D., Gustafson D.L., Ly-
deard C., Altaba C.R. y Giribet G. 2004. In-
vestigations into the phylogenetic relations-
hips of freshwater pearl mussels (Bivalvia:
Margaritiferidae) based on molecular data:
implications for their taxonomy and bioge-
ography. Journal ofMolluscan Studies, 70: 379-
288.
IUCN 2008. Red List of Threatened Species.
Available on line at: <www.iucnredlist.
org/>. Downloaded on 21 February 2009.
Jansen W., Bauer G. y Zahner-Meike E.
2001. Glochidial mortality in freshwater
mussels. En Bauer, G. y Wáchtler, K.
(Eds.): Ecology and Evolution of the fresh-
water mussels Unionoida. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin Heidelberg, Ecological Studies, 145:
185-211.
Kennard A.S., Salisbury A.E. y Woodward
B.B. 1925. Notes on the British post-Pliocene
Unionidae, with more especial regard to the
means of identification of fossil fragments.
Proceedings of the Malacological Societu ofLon-
don, 16: 267-285.
Lea I. 1834. Observations on the naiads, etc.
Transactions ofthe American Philosophical So-
ciety, 1834: 23-119 + 19 pl.
Life-Náyade 2004. Estudio científico sobre Mar-
garitifera margaritifera y su hábitat en el ám-
bito de actuación de LIFE Náyade. Morales J. J.
(Coord.). Informe Inédito. Consejería de Me-
dio Ambiente, Junta de Castilla y León. 370
pp + 27 planos.
Life-Náyade 2005. Plan de Acción de Margari-
tifera margaritifera en Castilla y León. Mora-
les J. J., Araujo R. y Santos P. (Coords.). In-
forme Inédito. Consejería de Medio Am-
biente, Junta de Castilla y León. 59 pp + 6
planos.
Life-Náyade 2006. Estudio de estimación de los
hospedadores de Margaritifera margaritifera
en el ámbito de actuación Life-Náyade. Morales
J. J. (Coord.). Informe Inédito. Consejería de
Medio Ambiente, Junta de Castilla y León.
229 pp + 6 planos.
Lister M. 1678. Historiae Animalium Angliae,
etc, London, J. Martin. 250 pp + 9 tab.
Lister M. 1685. Appendicis ad Historiam Anima-
lium Angliae. In J. Godaert's De Insectis. Lon-
don, S. Smith. 40 pp + 21 tab.
Lister M. 1770. Historiae sive sinopsis methodicae
Conchyliorum. Oxford, W. Huddesford. 103
pp + 439 tab.
Locard A. 1893. Conchyliologie Franqaise. Les co-
quilles des eaux douces et saumátres de
France. París, Bailliére. 327 pp.
Locard A. 1899. Conchyliologie Portugaise.
Coquilles terrestres des eaux douces et sau-
matres. Archives du Museum d'Histoire Natu-
rel de Lyon, 7: 1-303.
López M.A. y Altaba C.R. 2005. Fish host de-
termination for Margaritifera auricularia (Bi-
valvia: Unionoida): results and implications.
Bolletino Malacologico, 41 (9-12): 89-98.
López M.A., Altaba C.R., Rouault T. y Gis-
bert E. 2007. The European sturgeon Aci-
penser sturio is a suitable host for the glochi-
dia of the freshwater pearl mussel Margari-
tifera auricularia. Journal ofMolluscan Studies,
73: 207-209.
Lucey J. 2006. The pearl mussel, Margaritifera
margaritifera (L.), in hard water in Ireland. Bi-
ology and Environment: Proceedings ofthe Royal
Irish Academy, 106b: 143 -153.
Lydeard C., Cowie R.H., Ponder W.F., Bo-
gan A.E., Bouchet P., Clarck S.A., Cum-
mings K.S., Frest T.J., Gargominy O., Her-
bert D.G., Hershler R., Perez K.E., Roth B.,
Seddon M., Strong E.E. y Thompson F.G.
2004. The global decline of nonmarine mo-
llusks. BioScience, 54: 321-330.
Machordom A., Araujo R., Erpenbeck D. y
Ramos M.A. 2003. Phylogeography and con-
servation genetics of European endangered
Margaritiferidae. Biological Journal ofthe Lin-
nean Society, 78: 235-252.
Madeira M.J., Araujo R. y Ayala I. 2007. Lo-
calización, distribución y seguimiento de las po-
blaciones de náyades (bivalvos dulceacuícolas)
en el Territorio Histórico de Álava. Diputación
Foral de Álava. 66 pp.
Martínez-Ortí A. y Robles F. 2003. Moluscos
continentales de la Comunidad Valenciana. Ge-
neralitat Valenciana. Conselleria de Terri-
tori i Habitatge. Valencia. 261 pp.
69
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Morales J.J., Negro A.I., Lizana M., Martí-
nez A. y Palacios J. 2004. Preliminary study
of the endangered populations of pearl mus-
sel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) in the river
Tera (north-west Spain): habitat analysis and
management considerations. Aquatic conser-
vation: marine and freshwater ecosystems, 14:
587-596.
Morales J.J, Santos P., Peñín E. y Palacios J.
2007. Incidencia negativa de los incendios
sobre una población de la náyade Margariti-
fera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia; Unionoida) en
el río Negro (Zamora). Ecología , 21: 91-106.
Morelet A. 1845. Descriptions des Mollusques te-
rrestres et fluviátiles du Portugal, Paris. 116 pp
+ 14 lam.
Nagel K.-0. 1999. Anatomische und morpho-
logische Merkmale europáischer Najaden
(Unionoidea: Margaritiferidae und Unioni-
dae) und ihre Bedeutung für die Systematik.
Heldia, 2: 33-48.
Nagel K.-O. 2004. Observations on the repro-
ductive period of the freshwater mussel Po-
tomida littoralis (Unionidae). Iberus, 22: 1-8.
Nagel K.-Ov Badino G. y Celebrano G. 1998.
Systematics of European naiades (Bivalvia:
Margaritiferidae and Unionidae): a review
and some new aspects. Malacological Review,
Suppl. 7 (Bivalvia I): 83-104.
Negus C.L. 1966. A quantitative study of growth
and production of unionid mussels in the
River Thames at Reading. Journal of Animal
Ecology, 35: 513-532.
Nesemann H. 1993. Zoogeographie und Ta-
xonomie der Muschel-Gattungen Unió Phi-
lipsson 1788, Pseudanodonta Bourguignat 1877
und Pseudunio Haas 1910 im oberen und mit-
tleren Donausystem (Bivalvia: Unionidae,
Margaritiferidae). Nachrichtenblatt der Ersten
Voralberger Malakologischen Gesellschaft, 1: 20-
40.
Nezlin L.P., Cunjak R.A., Zotin A. Y Zl-
uganov V.V. 1994. Glochidium morphol-
ogy of the freshwater pearl mussel ( Margar-
itifera margaritifera) and glochidiosis of At-
lantic salmón ( Salmo salar): a study by
scanning electrón microscopy. Canadian Jour-
nal ofZoology, 72: 15-21.
Nienhuis J.A.J.H. 2003. The rediscovery of Spen-
gler's freshwater pearlmussel Pseudunio au-
ricularius (Spengler, 1793) (Bivalvia,
Unionoidea, Margaritiferidae) in two river
Systems in France, with an analysis of some
factors causing its decline. Basteria 67 (1-3):
67-86.
Nilsson S. 1822. Historia Molluscorum Sveciae,
etc. 124 pp.
Nobre A. 1912. Fauna aquícola de Portugal, II.
Molluscos fluviaes. Boletim da Direcgdo Geral
da Agricultura 4.
Nobre A. 1930. Moluscos terrestres, fluviais e das
aguas solobras de Portugal. Ministeria da Agri-
cultura. Direqiao Geral dos Servicios Flores-
tais e Aquícolas. Porto, 259 pp + 18 pl.
Nobre A. 1941. Fauna malacológica de Portu-
gal II. Moluscos terrestres e fluviais. Memo-
rias e Estudos do Museu de Zoología da Univer-
sidade de Coimbra 124: 1-278.
Ortmann A.E. 1911. The classification of the Eu-
ropean Naiades. The Nautilus, 25: 5-7.
Outeiro A., Ondina P., Fernández C., Amaro
R. y San Miguel E. 2008. Population density
and age structure of the freshwater pearl
mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera, in two Ibe-
rian rivers. Freshwater Biology, 53: 485-496.
Pallary P. 1923. Descriptions de trois
mollusques nouveaux du Maroc. Bulletin
de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc,
3: 78-79.
Pallary P. 1927. Complément a la faune ma-
lacologique de la Berbérie. Journal de Conchy-
liologie, 71: 197-277 + 7 pl.
Pallary P. 1936. Deuxiéme complément a la
faune malacologique de la Berbérie. Journal
de Conchyliologie, 80: 5-65 + 4 pl.
Panini E., Sicuro B., Daprá F y Forneris G.
2009. Preliminary considerations for fresh-
water mussel reproduction and possible ap-
plication for extensive rearing in Italy. Jour-
nal of Conchology, 39: 709-716.
Pekkarinen M. y Englund V. 1995. Descrip-
tion of unionacean glochidia in Finland, with
a table aiding in their identification. Archiv
fur Hydrobiology, 134: 515-531.
Pekkarinen M. y Hanstén C. 1998. Succes of
metamorphosis of the lake mussel ( Anodonta
anatina) glochidia in different hosts and in vi-
tro. Proceedings ofthe 50th Annual Meeting of
the Scandinavian Societyfor Electron Microscopy.
Espoo and Helsinki, Finland, 7-10 June 1998:
115-116.
Pekkarinen M. y Valovirta 1. 1996. Anatomy
of the glochidia of the freshwater pearl mus-
sel, Margaritifera margaritifera (F.). Archiv für
Hydrobiologie, 137: 411-423.
Pérez-Quintero J.C., Bech M. y Huertas J.F.
2004. Eos moluscos de las aguas continenta-
les de la provincia de Huelva (SO España).
Iberus, 22: 19-31.
Pontoppidan E. 1755. The Natural History of
Norway; containing a particular and accurate
account ofthe temperature ofthe air, the different
soils, vegetables, metáis, minerals, stones, beasts,
birds, andfishes. Linde, London. xxiii + 206 pp.,
14 pls.; vii + 291 pp., pls. 15-28.
Pou-Rovira Q., Araujo R., Boix D., Clavero
M., Feo C., Ordeix M. y Zamora L. 2009. Pre-
sence of the alien species Chinese pond mus-
sel Anodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) in the Ibe-
rian Peninsula. Graellsia, 65 (1): 67-70.
70
ARAUJO ET AL.: Las náyades de la península Ibérica
Reís J. 2003. The freshwater pearl mussel Mar-
garitifera margaritifera (L.) (Bivalvia, Unio-
noida) rediscovered in Portugal and threats
to its survival. Biological Conservation, 114:
447-452.
Reís J. (coord.) 2006. Atlas dos bivalves de
agua doce em Portugal continental. Instituto
da Conservagáo da Natureza, Lisboa. 130
pp.
Reís J. y Araujo R. 2009. Redescription of Unió
tumidiformis Castro, 1899 (Bivalvia: Unio-
noidea), an endemism from Southwestern
Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Natural History,
43 (31-32): 1929-1945.
Reís J., Machordom A. y Araujo R. Morpho-
logical and molecular diversity of Unioni-
dae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from Portugal. Mala-
cologia. En revisión.
Ricciardi A., Neves R.J. y Rasmunssen J.B.
1998. Impending extinctions of North Ame-
rican freshwaters mussels (Unionida) follo-
wing the zebra mussel ( Dreissena polymorpha )
invasión. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67: 613-
619.
Rolán E. 1998. Evolución de la situación actual
de las especies de moluscos de agua dulce
existentes en el tramo del río Miño de Goián-
Eiras (Galicia, NO España). Thalassas, 14: 99-
103.
Ross H. 1992. The reproductive biology of the
freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera mar-
garitifera in Co Donegal. Irish Naturalist's Jour-
nal, 24: 44-50.
Rossmássler E.A. 1835. Iconographie der Land
und Süsswasser Mollusken, etc. Dresden y Leip-
zig. 1:1-132 + tab. 1-5.
Rossmássler E.A. 1836. Iconographie der Land
und Süsswasser Mollusken, etc. Dresden y Leip-
zig. IV: 1-27 + tab. 16-20.
Rossmássler E.A. 1837. Iconographie der Land
und Süsswasser Mollusken, etc. Dresden y Leip-
zig. V-VL1-70 + tab. 21-30.
San Miguel E., Monserrat S., Fernández C.,
Amaro R. Hermida M., Ondina P. y Al-
taba C.R. 2004. Growth models and
longevity of freshwater pearl mussel {Mar-
garitifera margaritifera ) in Spain. Canadian
Journal ofZoology, 82: 1370-1379.
Schróter J.S. 1779. Die Geschichte der Flüss-
conchylien, etc. Halle. 434 pp + 11 tab.
Simpson C.T. 1900. Synopsis of the Naiades or
pearly fresh-water mussels. Proceedings ofthe
United States National Museum, 22 (1205): 501-
1044.
Smith D.G. 2001. Systematics and distribution
of the recent Margaritiferidae. En Bauer, G.
and Wachtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology and Evolu-
tion of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida.
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Ecologi-
cal Studies, 145: 33-49.
Soler J., Moreno D., Araujo R. y Ramos M.A.
2006. Diversidad y distribución de los mo-
luscos de agua dulce en la Comunidad de Ma-
drid (España). Graellsia, 62: 201-252.
SORIANO O., VlLLENA M. Y ALONSO M.S. 2001.
Catálogo de los Uniónidos (Mollusca, Unio-
nidae) de la península Ibérica conservados en
el Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
(CSIC). Graellsia, 57: 133-152.
Spengler L. 1793. Om Slaegterne Chaena, Mya
og Unió. Skrifter af Naturhistorie Selskabet, 3:
16-69.
Strayer D.L., Caraco N.F., Colé J.J., Find-
lay S. y Pace M.L. 1999. Transformation of
freshwater ecosystem by bivalves. BioScience,
49: 19-27.
Strayer D.L., Downing J.A., Haag W.R., King
T.L., Layzer J.B., Newton T.J. y Nichols
S.J. 2004. Changing perspectives on pearly
mussels, North America' s most imperiled
animáis. BioScience, 54: 429-439.
Toledo C., Araujo R. y Machordom A. Phy-
logeographical differentiation of Iberian po-
pulations of the freshwater pearl mussel
( Margaritifera margaritifera ) based on micro-
satellite data. Molecular Ecology, en revisión.
Valledor A. y Araujo R. 2006. The historical
misidentification of Margaritifera auricularia
for M. margaritifera (Bivalvia, Unionoidea)
explained by their iconography. Malacologia,
48: 285-294.
Vaughn C.C., Nichols S.J. y Spooner D.E.
2008. Community and foodweb of freshwa-
ter mussels. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society, 27: 409-423.
Velasco J.C., Araujo R., Bueno R. y Laguna
A. 2002. Descubierta la población europea
más meridional de la madreperla de río Mar-
garitifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia, Unionoida),
en la península Ibérica (Río Águeda, Sala-
manca). Iberus, 20: 99-108.
Velasco J.C., Araujo R., Balset J., Toledo C.
y Machordom A. 2006. Primeros datos so-
bre la presencia de Margaritifera margariti-
fera L. (Bivalvia, Unionoida) en la cuenca del
Tajo (España). Iberus, 24: 69-79.
Velasco J.C. y Romero R. 2006. Las náyades en
Castilla y León. Junta de Castilla y León. Con-
sejería de Medio Ambiente. Valladolid. 77 pp.
Verdú J.R. y Galante E. (Eds.) 2006. Libro Rojo
de los Invertebrados de España. Dirección Ge-
neral para la Biodiversidad. Ministerio de
Medio Ambiente, Madrid. 411 pp.
Vidal Abarca C y Suárez M.L. 1985. Lista fau-
m'stica y bibliográfica de los moluscos (Gastropoda
y Bivalvia) de las aguas continentales de la pe-
nínsula Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Listas de la flora
y fauna de las aguas continentales de la penín-
sula Ibérica. Publicación n° 2. Asociación Es-
pañola de Limnología. 191 pp.
71
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Wáchtler K., Dreher-Mansur M.C. y Richter
T. 2001. Larval types and early postlarval bi-
ology in naiads (Unionoida). En Bauer, G. y
Wáchtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology and Evolution
of the freshwater mussels Unionoida. Sprin-
ger-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Ecological Stud-
ies, 145: 93-125.
Watters G.T. 2001. The evolution of the Unio-
nacea in North America, and its implications
for the worldwide fauna. En Bauer, G. y
Wáchtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology and Evolution
of the freshwater mussels Unionoida. Sprin-
ger-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Ecological Stud-
ies, 145: 281-307.
Wood E.M. 1974. Development and morpho-
logy of the glochidium larva of Anodonta cyg-
nea (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Journal of Zoology,
Eondon, 173: 1-13.
Young M., Purser G.J. y Al-Mousawi B. 1987.
Infection and successful reinfection of brown
trout [Salmo trutta (L.)] with glochidia of Mar-
gar itif era margaritifera (L.). American Malaco-
logical Bulletin, 5: 125-128.
Young M., Cosgrove P.J. y Hastie L.C. 2001.
The extent of, and causes for, the declive of
a highly threatened naiad: Margaritifera mar-
garitifera. En Bauer, G. y Wáchtler, K. (Eds.):
Ecology and Evolution of the freshwater
mussels Unionoida. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Heidelberg, Ecological Studies, 145: 337-357.
Zahner E. y Hanson J.M. 2001. Effect of
muskrat predation on Naiads. En Bauer, G.
y Wáchtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology and Evolu-
tion of the freshwater mussels Unionoida.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Ecologi-
cal Studies, 145: 163-184.
Ziuganov V., Kaluzhin S., Beletsky V. Y Pop-
kovitch E. 2001. The pearl mussel-salmon
community in the Varzuga River, Northwest
Russia: problems of environmental impacts.
En Bauer, G. y Wáchtler, K. (Eds.): Ecology
and Evolution of the freshwater mussels
Unionoida. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidel-
berg, Ecological Studies, 145: 359-366.
Ziuganov V., San Miguel E., Neves R., Longa
A., Fernández C., Amaro R., Beletsky V.,
P opkovit ch E., Kaluzhin S. y Johnson T.
2000. Life span variation of the Freshwater
pearl shell: A model species for testing lon-
gevity mechanisms in animáis. Ambio, 29:
102-105.
Ziuganov V., Zotin A., Nezlin L. y Trettakov
V. 1994. The freshwater pearl mussels and their
relationships with salmonid fish. VNIRO Pu-
blishing House. Moscow. 104 pp.
72
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberas , 27 (2): 73-76, 2009
Presencia de Acicula norrisi Gittenberger y Boeters, 1977
(Gastropoda: Aciculidae) en España
Presence of Acicula norrisi Gittenberger and Boeters, 1977
(Gastropoda: Aciculidae) in Spain
Óscar GAVIRA ROMERO*, Estrella ROBLES DOMÍNGUEZ**, Manuel
BECERRA PARRA*** y Mariano Luis LARRAZ AZCÁRATE**
Recibido el 29-IV-2009. Aceptado el 1 5-IX-2009
RESUMEN
En el presente artículo se cita por primera vez Acicula norrisi Gittenberger y Boeters,
1977 para España, en Andalucía, provincia de Málaga. Se describe la zona de recolec-
ción, dando datos de su geología, clima, botánica y usos. Se aportan coordenas U.T.M. y
fotos de esta especie. También se citan especies acompañantes de otros micromoluscos de
agua dulce y tierra de la misma zona de captura.
ABSTRACT
In this paper we record Acicula norrisi Gittenberger and Boeters, 1977 for the first time in
the province of Málaga, Andalusia, Spain. We describe the collecting area, with data
about its geology, climate, plants and uses. We also provide UTM coordinates and an
illustration of this species. Some other accompanying freshwater and land micromolluscs
from the area are also cited.
INTRODUCCIÓN
La familia Aciculidae Gray, 1850 está
representada en España por tres
géneros: Platyla Moquin - Tandon, 1856,
Menkia Boeters, Gittenberger y Subai,
1985 y Acicula Hartmann, 1821, este
último representado en el norte de
España por las especie Acicula fusca
(Montangu, 1803) y A. callostoma (Clessi,
1911). En la Península Ibérica se ha des-
crito para Gibraltar la especie Adula
norrisi Gittenberger y Boeters, 1977,
citada nuevamente para Gibraltar por
Talaván Gómez y Talaván Serna
(2006). Está considerada una especie de
“datos insuficientes" (DD) en el Libro
Rojo de Invertebrados de Andalucía y
está catalogada como vulnerable en la
Lista Roja de Especies Amenazadas de
la UICN (Barea-Azcón, Ballesteros-
Duperón y Moreno, 2008).
En el presente trabajo se cita por
primera vez para España, extendién-
dose su área de distribución a Andalu-
cía, provincia de Málaga.
El conocimiento de la biodiversidad
es importante para la conservación de
* Departamento de Biología Vegetal. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de Málaga. Apdo. 59, E-29080.
Málaga, España. E-mail: ogavira@hotmail.com
** Departamento de Zoología y Ecología. Facultad Ciencias, Universidad Navarra, Apdo. 177, E-31080
Pamplona, Navarra, España. E-mail: erobles@alumni.unav.es; mlarraz@unav.es
*** Barriada San Miguel n° 1, E-29370. Benaoján. Málaga, España. E-mail: libarense@yahoo.es
73
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figura 1. Vista frontal (a), dorsal (b) y lateral derecha (c) de la concha ázAcicula norrisi (altura real
3,2 mm)
Figure 1. Front (a), dorsal (b) and right side (c) view of the shell of Acicula norrisi ( actual height 3.2
mm).
las especies, la gestión de zonas natura-
les y la protección de las mismas.
Andalucía es una región con nume-
rosos endemismos, tanto en su fauna
como en su flora, por este motivo todos
los datos que contribuyan al conoci-
miento de sus especies son importantes.
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
La zona del valle del Genal muestra
una diversidad geológica y botánica
marcada. En ella se encuentra rocas
calizas karstificadas, generalmente defo-
restadas, sin desarrollo de suelo potente.
También afloran rocas silíceas con un
gran desarrollo de suelo pero con bajo o
nulo porcentaje de calcio. En las perido-
titas el desarrollo de suelo es escaso, al
igual que la cantidad de calcio.
Las zonas de vegas son el único
lugar donde las especies forestales,
ligadas al suelo y a la hojarasca, pueden
encontrar su hábitat. En las zonas de las
vegas sí que se encuentra suelo, con
humus y cubierto por hojarasca. El
calcio puede provenir tanto de los
aportes terrígenos de las laderas del
valle como de los sedimentos aportados
por las crecidas del río. La existencia de
calcio en el suelo favorece la presencia
de gasterópodos.
El material se ha recolectado en la loca-
lidad de Genalguacil (Málaga), U.T.M: 30
S TF94, el 09-03-2008, en la vega del río
Genal, entre la hojarasca de una zona con
humedad ambiental elevada.
El lugar de la recolección se encuen-
tra en la base de un talud de una ladera
de roca silícea (micaesquistos). El único
aporte calizo proviene del río ya que la
zona se inunda por las crecidas excep-
cionales. Se han medido el pH y dureza
del agua del río, dando resultados de
pH 8 y dureza 25° GH.
El clima es termomediterráneo (tem-
peratura media entre 17 y 19 °C)
74
Gavira MORENO ET AL.: Presencia de Acicula norrisi en España
Tabla I Listado de especies recolectadas en Genalguacil, vega del río Genal (Málaga) U.T.M: 30 S
TF94, con indicación de su estatuto de conservación (DD = Datos insuficientes, NT = Casi ame-
nazada) y de área de distribución general.
Table I. List of species collected at Genalguacil, in the valley of Genal river ( Málaga ) U. T.M: 30 S
TF94, with an indication oftheir conservation status and general distribution range.
Familia Aciculidae Gray, 1850
Acicula norrisi Gittenberger y Boeters, 19/7 (Fig. 1)
Familia Ellobiidae Adams, 1855
Carychium tridentatum (Risso, 1 826)
Familia Pristilomatidae Cockerell, 1891
Vitrea contracta (Westerlund, 1871)
Familia Testacellidae Gray, 1 840
Jestacella sp.
Familia Trissexodontidae Nordsieck, 1 987
Gasuliella simplicula (Morelet, 1854)
Oestophora tarnieri (Morelet, 1854)
Oestophora ortizi De Winter y Ripken, 1 991
Familia Hygromiidae Tyron, 1866
Jrichia cf. martigena (Férussac, 1832)
Familia Lauriidae Stemberg, 1925
Lauria cylindracea (Da Costa, 1 778)
Familia Punctidae Morse, 1 864
Paralaoma servilis (Shuttleworth, 1 852)
Familia Valloniidae Morse, 1854
Acanthinula aculeata (Müller, 1774)
DD Sur Península Ibérica
Eurosiberiana
Paleártica-occidental
Norte África - Sur Península Ibérica
NT
Norte África - Sur Península Ibérica
NT Andalucía, Sur Guadalquivir
Euromediterráneo-turánica
Mediterránea occidental-Macaronésica
Paleártica-occidental
Tabla II Listado de especies recolectadas en Genalguacil, vega del río Genal (Málaga), en el rezu-
madero. U.T.M: 30 S TF94, con indicación de su área de distribución general.
Table II. List of species collected at Genalguacil, in the valley of Genal river (Málaga), at the spring
U. T.M: 30 S TF94, with an indication of their general distribution range.
Familia Sphaeriidae Dalí, 1895
Pisidium sp.
Familia Hydrobiidae Troschel, 1857
Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray, 1 843) Cosmopolita
Familia Lymnaeidae Rafinesque, 1818
Galbo truncatula (Müller, 1774) Holártica
Tabla III. Especies adicionales encontradas en la otra orilla del río en Benarrabá, vega del río Genal
(Málaga) U.T.M: 30 S TF94, con indicación de su área de distribución general.
Table III. Additional species collected at the other side of Benarrabá, in the valley of Genal river
(Málaga) U. T.M: 30 S TF94, with an indication oftheir general distribution range.
75
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
húmedo (precipitación media entre 1000
y 1600 mm anuales).
La vegetación de la zona pertenece
fitosociológicamente a la asociación
Rubo ulmifolii-Coriarietum myrtifoliae, que
es una formación de orla de la vegeta-
ción riparia, las saucedas de E quisto- Sali-
cetum pedicellatae. Se trata de una zona
bastante natural aunque con cierto apro-
vechamiento puesto que aparece un
rezumadero de agua que es utilizado
como fuente. Las zonas de vegas suelen
estar transformadas en huertas.
El material se ha recolectado entre la
hojarasca y bajo piedras, troncos y suelo.
Todos los ejemplares fueron recolec-
tados a mano, y se conservan conchas de
todos ellos (las conchas de Vitrea son de
otro lugar próximo). Se han reconocido
todas las especies salvo una babosa no
recolectada. Oxychilus se ha identificado
por la concha, sin disección. De las conchas
muertas no se han guardado las fechas,
pero todas son anteriores a la de Acicula.
Para la identificación de las especies
y su estatus se ha consultado a los
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Barea-Azcón J.M, Ballesteros-Duperón E. y
Moreno D. (coords.) 2008. Libro Rojo de In-
vertebrados de Andalucía. 4 Tomos. Consejería
de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Se-
villa. 1430 pp.
Boeters H.D., Gittenberger E. y Subai P. 1989.
Die Aciculidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Pro-
sobranchia). Zoologische Verhandenlingen. Uit-
gegeven door het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke
Historie te Leiden. 252: 1 - 234.
Gittenberger E. y Boeters H.D. 1977. Some re-
marles on Acicula s.s. (Prosobranchia: Ris-
soacea). Journalof Conchology. 29: 125 -128.
Kerney M.P. y Cameron R.A.D. 1979. A fiel
guide to the land snails ofBritain an North-west
Europa. Edit. Collins, Londres. 288 pp.
Larraz M.L. y Equísoain J.J. 1993. Moluscos
terrestres y acuáticos de Navarra (Norte de
la Península Ibérica). Publicaiones. Universi-
dad. de Navarra (Serie Zoológica). 23: 1 - 304.
siguientes autores: Kerney y Cameron
(1979), Larraz y Equísoain (1993),
Ruiz, Cárcaba, Porras y Arrébola
(2006), Boeters, Gittenberger y Subai
(1989), Gittenberger y Boeters, (1977),
Talaván y Talaván (2006), López y
Vaquero (2002), Rosas, Ramos y
García (1992), Barea-Azcón et al.
(2008).
RESULTADOS
En la Tabla I se presenta e listado de
especies recolectadas en Genalguacil,
con indicación de su estatuto de conser-
vación y de área de distribución general.
Las especies encontradas en el rezu-
madero se detallan en la Tabla II.
En la vega de enfrente, en la otra
orilla del río, se han recolectado también
otras especies asociadas a la hojarasca
de las vegas del Genal. En esta zona
están presentes todas las especies acom-
pañantes de Acicula salvo Carychium y
además las incluidas en la Tabla III.
López J. y Vaquero A. 2002. Lista provisional
de Moluscos de España protegidos o a pro-
teger. URL: http:/ / www.geocities.com/ mal-
acologia/ protecio.html. Consultado:
2/12/2008.
Rosas G., Ramos M. y García A. 1992. Inver-
tebrados españoles protegidos por convenios in-
ternacionales. Edit. Ministerios de Agricul-
tura, Pesca y Ganadería, (I.C.O.N.A.), Co-
lección técnica). Madrid. 250 pp.
Ruiz A., Cárcaba A., Porras A.I. y Arrebola
J.R. 2006. Caracoles terrestres de Andalucía.
Guía y manual de identifiación. Edit: Fundación
Gypaetus y Junta de Andalucía. 303 pp.
Talaván Gómez J. y Talaván Serna J. 2006.
Contribución a la malacofauna terrestre del
peñón de Gibraltar. Spira, vol. 2 (1): 37-40.
76
Iberus, 27 (2): 77-83, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacologta
On Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae)
Sobre Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae)
Enzo CAMPANI* and Jakov PRKIC**
Recibido el 20-VII-2009. Aceptado el 28-IX-2009
ABSTRACT
We revise here the eulimid species Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869), discussing the past
and recent literature by comparing the results with the type material characters. The still
existing material consists of only one shell, which matches very well Brusina's original
description and his repeated statement that he found only one specimen during his whole
life. We have concluded that no shell of M. stalioi has yet been known other than the type,
and that its recently published images have to be reassigned to Vitreolina levantina Olive-
rio, Buzzurro and Villa, 1994, suggesting also that the latter be moved to Melanella
Bowdich, 1 822. Lack of any further record of M. stalioi after the type may suggest its non
European origin; although this might be likely, we think it is premature to propose remov-
ing this species from the present Mediterranean molluscan fauna.
RESUMEN
Se revisa el eulímido Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869), discutiendo la literature antigua y
reciente y comparando los resultados con las características del material tipo. El material
que aún se conserva consiste en una única concha, que se corresponde muy bien con la
descripción original de Brusina y con su repetida afirmación de que solo encontró un
único ejemplar durante toda su vida. Hemos concluido que aún no se han encontrado
conchas de M. stalioi además de la del tipo y que las recientes imágenes publicadas
deben ser reasignadas a Vitreolina levantina Oliverio, Buzzurro y Villa, 1994, sugiriendo
además que esta última debería incluirse en el género Melanella Bowdich, 1 822. La falta
de citas adicionales de M. stalioi tras su descripción puede sugirir un origen no europeo;
aunque podría ser el caso consideramos prematuro eliminar esta especie de la fauna
mediterránea actual.
INTRODUCTION
The taxon Eulima stalioi Brusina,
1869, presently assigned to Melanella
Bowdich, 1822, has been debated and
interpreted several times in its 140-year
existence. With the aim of better under-
standing the nature of this species we
have examined all the bibliography
available to us.
The species was described by
Brusina (1869) on a single shell, found
in Split (Dalmatia, Croatia). The author
did not figure this shell either in the
original paper or in the two that fol-
io wed (Brusina, 1886, 1907) where this
taxon was treated. This may have been
the reason for some different points of
view on E. stalioi; the two best known
are the ones by Monterosato in Crosse
(1877) and Jeffreys (1884), both
rebutted later by Brusina (1886).
* Corso G. Mazzini 299, 57126 Livorno, Italy. enzo.campani@fastwebnet.it
** Getaldiceva 11, 21000 Split, Croatia. jakov.prkicl@st.t-com.hr
77
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
The studied literature indicates that
the identification of M. stalioi causes
some difficulties even now, 140 years
after its description. We have concluded
that these doubts could only be dis-
pelled by a study of Brusina's type
material, provided that it still exists.
Fortunately, we found the single shell of
this species in the Brusina collection,
hosted in HPM-Zagreb (Hrvatski Priro-
doslovni Muzej, Zagreb); we were able
to study it and give a report in this
paper.
MATERIALS
The unique shell of E. stalioi present
in the Brusina collection, with new
inventory number 1627, was measured
and photographed (Figs. 1-3). We found
also the original labels, with oíd inven-
tory number 1435 (Figs. 4-6), all hand-
written by Brusina himself, which show
the locality of origin (Split) consistent
with the original description.
DISCUSSION
Brusina's original diagnosis (1869:
242-243) reads as follows:
„E. testa turrita, obtusiuscula , solidula,
nitidissima , ebúrnea, semipellucida;
anfractibus 8 Vi, contiguis, planiusculis,
ultimo vix expanso, suturis distinctis ; aper-
tura magna, ovali; labro recto, obtusiuscula.
- Long. 7 mili., lat. 2 Vi mili. Habitat
Spalato. (Coll. Brusina, specim. 1.).
Cette espéce se distingue, á premiére
vue, de YE. intermedia, Cantraine [E.
( Rissoa ) sinuosa, Scacchi; E. ( Melania )
nítida, Philippi, non Lamarck] par sa
forme plus large, par ses tours légére-
ment convexes, tandis que, dans TE.
intermedia, ils sont tout á fait plans, et
aussi bien moins nombreux (8 V¿ au lieu
de 13, nombre de Fuñique exemplaire
de FE. intermedia recueilli jusqu'á
présent par moi dans FAdriatique), par
la grandeur de son ouverture et par son
bord externe droit et nullement dilaté.
L'unique exemplaire que je connaisse
jusqu'ici a été trouvé par M. le profes-
seur Stalio de Lesina á Spalato: il a bien
voulu me le donner á publier, et je ne
puis mieux faire que de dédier Fespéce
á celui qui l'a découverte et a enrichi
ainsi d'une forme spécifique nouvelle la
faune de la Dalmatie. M. G. Jeffreys, qui
a eu occasion d'examiner cette espéce, a
écrit sur Fetiquette: E. sp. n. et confirmé
ainsi sa nouveauté."
Our measurements on the type were
6.7 x 2.2 mm, in good agreement with
the diagnosis, but the shell is damaged,
lacking its apical whorls and with a par-
tially splintered external margin of the
lip. The number of whorls matches the
one in the original diagnosis, 8 Vi, thus
ruling out damage after the publication
date. So its being "obtusiuscula" cannot
be taken as the shell character, since it is
due to the lack of apical whorls. The
partial splintering of the external lip is
indeed minor damage since the lip
profile can be easily seen in the scars
present on the whorls: they are almost
straight, with only a hint of median
bulge and no clear adapical sinus. The
shell shape is straight, a character not
mentioned by Brusina, and the whorls
are distinctly convex. All these charac-
teristics clearly distinguish M. stalioi
from all other European Melanella.
Monterosato (1872) reports for the
first time on E. stalioi, quoting it "ex
typ." and stating „é stata recentemente
riferita alia E. glabella, S. Wood, del
Crag", but without referring to the
origin of this opinión; he adds, "l'esem-
plare non e sufficientemente ben
conservato". It is clear that he saw the
type material during the visit to Brusina
in Zagreb in 1872, and possibly some
Crag material during his journey to
England shortly before. This dubious
synonymy with Eulima glabella S. Wood,
1842 was repeated (Monterosato, 1875,
1878), but Monterosato's opinión was
never a final one. He, for instance, wrote
as well "Eul. stalioi (? polita ) forma estra-
ordinaria" in a handwritten list of notes
on Brusina collection (Palazzi and
Ryolo, 2008) in an envelope which had
the writing "Zagreb 17 July 1872.
Brusina Coll." (Giannuzzi-Savelli,
private comm.).
78
CAMPANI AND PRKIÓ On Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae)
Figures 1-6. Melanella stalioi. 1-3: front, side and dorsal views of the holotype (HPM, Zagreb, new
inv. n° 1627), 6.7 x 2.2 mm; 4-6: Brusina’s handwritten labels.
Figuras 1-6. Melanella stalioi. 1-3: vista frontal, lateral y dorsal del holotipo (HPM, Zagreb, nuevo
inv. n° 1627), 6,7 x 2,2 mm; 4-6: las etiquetas manuscritas de Brusina.
79
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Crosse (1877) published the
drawing of a shell he received from
Monterosato "comprise dans un envoi
en communication": we shall refer to
this taxon as E. stalioi sensu Monterosato
in Crosse, 1877, the assignment being
from the latter author. That confirms
Monterosato's doubts on the nature of
E. stalioi; as a matter of fact his most
important catalogue of Mediterranean
molluscs (Monterosato, 1884) does not
mention at all this species.
Although Jeffreys also saw Brusina's
shell during his visit to Zadar in 1867
shortly before the paper on E. stalioi, he
had presented in 1884 quite a different
shell for Brusina's stalioi. His drawings
show a shell slightly but evidently
curved ( stalioi is straight) and having
fíat whorls (distinctly convex in stalioi ).
Brusina (1886) wrote again on E.
stalioi, having seen the misinterpreta-
tions of his species by Monterosato in
Crosse (1877) and Jeffreys (1884).
He first explains he wrote to Jeffreys
on this matter and that Jeffreys asked
for his specimen for inspection. Here,
for the second time, Brusina States the
uniqueness of his shell: "Mi prego di
mandargli il mió esemplare in commu-
nicazione e sebbene a malincuore feci
fare il viaggio del nostro esemplare
único ed originale fino a Londra, puré
l'ho fatto nell'interesse della scienza."
After Jeffreys acknowledged his misin-
terpretation, Brusina suggested a new
ñame for Jeffreys' species, naming it
Eulima doderleini.
Bouchet and Waren (1986)
recently transferred the latter to
Melanella, choosing Jeffreys' specimen as
a lectotype of Melanella doderleini
(Brusina, 1886). They support its differ-
ence from E. stalioi since „We have
examined material of E. stalioi deter-
mined by Brusina in ZMR [Zoological
Musem Rome] (sent to Monterosato)
and we can verify Brusina's statement."
We did not examine this material in
Rome and can not even know what it
really is since Brusina had only one shell
of E. stalioi according to all the pub-
lished data. This doubt about the mater-
ial in ZMR even increased after we had
received the information from Dr.
Warén that the specimen he saw in
Rome and the type of stalioi did not
belong to the same species.
In the same paper Brusina (1886) also
denied that Monterosato's (in Crosse) E.
stalioi could resemble his species: „ ...
perché la nostra specie é notevolmente
piú stretta ed i giri sono visibilmente piú
convessi, mentre nella specie del Crosse
si mostrano del tutto piani." Brusina then
proposes a new ñame for this shell also,
i.e. Eulima crossei. Later on Monterosato
(1890) himself quotes Eulima crosseana
Brusina, 1886 as a new ñame for the E.
stalioi published by Crosse; the right
ñame however should be crossei, while
we regard crosseana as an unjustified
emendation.
Shortly before his death, in a book
on his travels, Brusina (1907: 43-228)
wrote on stalioi for the last time, stating
again that he had seen only one speci-
men in his whole life:
„Prvi i jedini primjerak dobio sam
na dar od prof. Stalia, koji je tvrdio, da
ga je nasao kod Spljeta; cuva se u narod.
Muzeju; ali moram red, da mi je malko
sumnjiv ne samo zato, sto je jos uvijek
unikum, negó jos vise zato, sto je neo-
bicna oblika."
[The first and only specimen I
received as a gift from professor Stalio,
who affirmed that he found it near Split;
it is kept in the National Museum;
however, I must say that it is a bit suspi-
cious to me, not only because it is still
unique, but even more so because of its
unusual shape.]
Tenekides (1989) and Giannuzzi-
Savelli, Pusateri Palmeri and Ebreo
(1999) figured three shells assigned to
stalioi, from Greek (2) or Turkish waters
(1). These shells are quite different from
the E. stalioi type and we think that all
specimens have to be assigned to Vitre-
olina levantina Oliverio, Buzzurro and
Villa, 1994. We carefully compared the
shell shape from these images with
those of the holotype of V. levantina and
found no relevant difference either in
the shape or in the opening conforma-
tion and apex structure. The same goes
for our specimens (Figs. 7-9). We finally
80
CAMPANI AND PrkiÓ On Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae)
Figures 7-9. Shells of Melanella levantina. 7, 8: front and side views, h = 6.2 mm, Bozcaada Island,
Turkey, 8 m; 9: side view, h = 4.9 mm, Turkey 15 m.
Figuras 7-9. Conchas de Melanella levantina. 7, 8: vistas frontal y lateral, h = 6,2 mm, Isla de Boz-
caada, Turquía, 8 m; 9: vista lateral, h = 4,9 mm, Turquía 15 m.
examined why the authors put this
species in Vitreolina, a genus normally
hosting quite different looking forms
(i.e. vitreous, much more slender, less
sturdy set). Their main reasons were the
curved shell, the general opening ap-
pearance and the dip present at the lip
scar - suture Crossing. We point out that
a curved shell is present in some
Melanella as well, and moreover the
photograph in their paper showing the
false suture dip at the scar Crossing is
unclear. We gained the opinión that
Melanella should be a more suitable
genus for this species, even if provision-
ally, due to its morphological characters:
the shell height is unusual, more than 7
mm, it is not glossy transparent and its
"false suture" has a poor or nuil dip
while Crossing the lip scar. We therefore
suggest naming this species Melanella
levantina (Oliverio, Buzzurro and
Villa, 1994).
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The main result of this paper is
twofold: we at last know, 140 years since
its description, the true aspect of Eulima
stalioi and this can rule out many incor-
rect interpretations of this species, while
81
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
on the other hand we are left with a new
problem, since we have seen no other
material of this species. Moreover, we
do not know any Melanella record in lit-
erature which could possibly be related
to the stalioi type, at least among the
European species. The appearance of
the stalioi photos may make it possible
for someone to assign his material to
such species, but we doubt it due to lots
of material we examined from our per-
sonal and other collections.
We carefully examined the shell of
stalioi searching also for a sign of an
abnormal shell growth, but we found
none apart from the labial scars.
Dr. A. Warén (in litteris ) suggested a
non-European origin for the stalioi type,
relating it to a group of non-European
Melanella species, such as: Melanella ran-
dolphi (Vanatta, 1899), from Unalaska,
Alaska; Melanella lowei (Vanatta, 1899)
(see Vanatta, 1899), from Long Beach,
California; the Caribbean Melanella
nutans (Mühlfeld, 1824) (Redfern, 2001);
and some unnamed Indo-Pacific species,
mostly because of some similarities in the
convexity of the whorls. We examined
the above mentioned species and some
others in Bartsch (1917), yet we found
none resembling the stalioi type enough
to be regarded as conspecific. Our knowl-
edge of this group of species is however
too poor to be conclusive on this point,
and we leave to future studies a deeper
insight into this matter.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bartsch P. 1917. A monograph of West Amer-
ican Melanellid mollusks. Proceedings of the
United States National Museum, Washington.
53: 296-356.
Bouchet P. and Warén A. 1986. Revisión of
the Northeast Atlantic Bathyal and Abyssal
Aclididae, Eulimidae, Epitonidae (Mollusca,
Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico, Milano,
Supplemento 2: 298-576.
Brusina S. 1869. Gastéropodes nouveaux de
1' Adriatique. Journal de Conchyliologie , 17: 230-
249.
Brusina S. 1886. Appunti ed osservazioni
sull'ultimo lavoro di J. Gwyn Jeffreys. Glas-
nik hrvatskoga naravoslovnogadruztva, Zagreb,
god. 1: 182-221.
We think that we truly found the
original shell of Brusina's stalioi and that
the specimen was found in Split by
Stalio. This conclusión is supported also
by the fact that Brusina and Stalio were
interested in studies of marine fauna
only and exclusively in the Adriatic Sea;
both authors wrote many articles on this
matter. Here we need to mention that all
the eulimid material in Brusina's collec-
tion is from the Adriatic Sea.
Finally we think that it is too early to
propose removing Melanella stalioi from
the present Mediterranean molluscan
fauna, considering only its suspected
non-European origin and the lack of any
record after the type.
AKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Dr. Vesna átamol
(HPM, Zagreb) for providing us with the
material from the Brusina collection. We
would like to thank Dr. A. Warén (Stock-
holm) for his priceless comments on the
holotype, and aknowledge his critical
reading of our paper. Last but not least we
thank R. Giannuzzi-Savelli (Palermo) for
his information about Monterosato's
unpublished papers, Harry G. Lee (Jack-
sonville. Florida) for providing us with
the scans of the Redfern book tables on
Vitreohalcis nutans , Mr. S. Bartolini (Flo-
rence) for some photographs, and Mrs. D.
áantic for her valuable revisión of English.
Brusina S. 1907. Naravoslovne crtice sa sje-
vero-istocne obale Jadranskoga mora. Rad
Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti.
Matematicko-prirodoslovni razred. Zagreb, Knj.
42: 43-228.
Clemam (Check List of European Marine
Molluscs). Online Database: http:/ / www.
somali.asso.fr/ clemam/ index.php
Crosse H. 1877. Note complémentaire sur
YEulima Stalioi, Brusina. Journal de Conchy-
liologie, 25: 70-71, 422 (pl. III, fig. 3).
Giannuzzi-Savelli R., Pusateri F., Palmeri A.
and Ebreo C. 1999. Atlante delle conchiglie
marine del Mediterráneo. Vol. 3 (Caenogas-
tropoda parte 2: Ptenoglosa). Evolver, 127
pp.
82
Campani AND PrkiÓ On Melanella stalioi (Brusina, 1869) (Gastropoda: Eulimidae)
IlijaniC V. and StoSií M. 1972. Popis zbirke
mekusaca (Mollusca) Spiridiona Brusine. Hr-
vatski Narodni Zooloski Muzej, Zagreb, 86
pp.
Jeffreys J.G. 1884. On the Mollusca procured
during the "Lightning" and "Porcupine" Ex-
peditions. Part 8. Proceedings ofthe Zoological
Society ofLondon 1884 : 341-375.
Monterosato T. 1872. Notizie intorno alie
conchiglie mediterranee. Ufficio Tipográfico
di Michele Amenta, Palermo, 1-61.
Monterosato T. 1875. Nuova rivista delle
conchiglie mediterranee. Atti dell' Accademia
Palermitana di Scienze Lettere e Arti, Palermo,
Sez. II, 5: 1-50.
Monterosato T. 1878. Enumerazione e sinon-
imia delle conchiglie mediterranee. Giornale
Scienze Naturali ed Economiche, Palermo 13: 61-
115.
Monterosato T. 1884. Nomenclatura genérica e
specifica di alcune conchiglie mediterranee.
Palermo, Virzi. pp 152.
Monterosato T. 1890. Conchiglie della pro-
fonditá del mare di Palermo. Naturalista Si-
ciliano, 9 (7): 157-166.
Oliverio M., Buzzurro G. and Villa R. 1994.
A new Eulimid Gastropod from the Eastern
Mediterranean sea (Caenogastropoda,
Ptenoglossa). Bollettino Malacologico, Milano,
30 (5-9): 211-215.
Palazzi S. and Ryolo L. 2008. Tommaso Di
Maria, Márchese di Monterosato. Documenti
inediti sulla Sua vita e sulla Sua opera. On-
line distributed DVD. http: / / www.sim-on-
line.it/Risorse/download / Montero-
sato/ Monterosato.HTM. Fragment in Co-
rrispondenza / Brusina,
S/ 18720717-pgsl32-3.jpg
Redfern C. 2001. Bahamian seashells a thousand
species from Abaco, Bahamas. Bahami-
anseashells.com, Inc., Boca Ratón, pp. 1-280
+ ix + 120 pls.
Tenekides N.S. 1989. Mia sillogi Conchyli'on apo
tis Ellinikés Thalasses. Protopapa Press, Át-
hens. 188 pp.
Vanatta E.G. 1899. West American Eulimi-
dae. Proceedings ofthe Academy of Natural Sci-
ences of Philadelphia, 51: 254-267.
83
•-
Iberus , 27 (2): 85-92, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacologta
Two new Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) from the
Canary Islands
Dos nuevos Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) de las Islas Canarias
Roland HADORN* and Emilio ROLÁN**
Recibido el 30-VII-2009. Aceptado el 29-IX-2009
ABSTRACT
Two new Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815, are described from the Canary Islands: the sinistral F.
saundersi sp. nov. from Lanzarote, 3-15 m deep, ¡s compared to F. maroccensis (Gmelin,
1791) and F. elegans (Reeve, 1848), both from the West African coast; the dextral F. Fer-
nandez/ sp. nov. from northwest Gran Canaria, 150-200 m deep, is compared to F. tene-
rifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999 and F. sectus (Locard, 1 897).
RESUMEN
Se describen dos nuevos Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815 de Canarias: el levógiro F. saundersi
sp. nov. de Lanzarote se compara con F. maroccensis (Gmelin, 1791) y con F. elegans
(Reeve, 1 848), ambos de la costa oeste africana; el dextrógiro F. hernandezi sp. nov. del
noroeste de Gran Canaria se compara con F. tenerifensis Hadorn y Rolán, 1 999 y con F.
sectus (Locard, 1897).
INTRODUCTION
The genus Fusinus is well represen-
tad in the Mediterranean fauna by a
number of small to médium sized spe-
cies. Sabelli, Giannuzzi-Savelli and
Bedulli (1990) have mentioned 5 spe-
cies (and some more synonyms) from
the Mediterranean. Since that moment,
new studies were realized on additional
material and more species were descri-
bed: Buzzurro and Russo (2007) alre-
ady mentioned 11 Mediterranean spe-
cies and described 4 more. The presence
of a paucispiral protoconch is evidence
for a short dispersión range and a possi-
ble indication for endemism. This is the
reason for which even after the work of
Buzzurro and Russo (2007), one more
species has been described (Hadorn,
Afonso and Rolán, 2009). Hadorn
and Rolán (1999) described F. tenerifen-
sis from the Canary Islands and Ha-
dorn and Ryall (1999) described F. bou-
cheti from the Ibero-Moroccan Gulf and
the Canary Islands from deep water.
Some species from the Canary
Islands are usually recorded as being
the same taxa as in the Mediterranean:
Fusinus pulchellus (Philippi, 1844), F. ros-
tratus (Olivi, 1792) and F. syracusanus
(Linnaeus, 1758). Fusinus bocagei (R
Fischer, 1882) from deep water is the
only species known to us that lives both
in the Canary Islands and in Europe and
West African coasts.
* Schützenweg 1, CH-3373 Róthenbach, Switzerland. susuf@bluewin.ch
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur 13782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. erolan@emi-
liorolan.com
85
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
The Canary Islands are an archipelago
with a high number of endemics. In the
last months, owing to the prepar ation of
a book on Canary Islands molluscs, some
of the populations collected from this
archipelago and stored in the collections
of José María Hernández, Francisco Déniz
and the second author were studied. The
present paper is the result of this study.
Abbreviations
MNCN: Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales de Madrid, Spain
MNHN: Muséum national d'Histoire
naturelle, París, France
MHNS: Museo de Historia Natural,
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
(Coll. Emilio Rolán)
CFD: Collection of Francisco Déniz, Las
Palmas, Gran Canaria, Canary
Islands, Spain
CJH: Collection of José María Hernán-
dez, Gáldar, Gran Canaria, Canary
Islands, Spain
CKF: Collection of Koen Fraussen, Aars-
chot, Belgium
CRH: Collection of Roland Hadorn,
Rothenbach, Switzerland
dd: dead collected specimen
juv: juvenile specimen
lv: live collected specimen
SYSTEM ATICS
Family Fasciolariidae Gray, 1853
Genus Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815
Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815: 145. Substitute ñame for 'Fusus Lamarck 1799' [=Fusus Bruguiére,
1789], non Fusus Helbling, 1779.
Type species: Murex colus Linnaeus, 1758, by typification of replaced ñame.
Sinistral species of Fusinus are usually
placed in the genus Sinistralia H. and A.
Adams, 1853 (type species by subsequent
designation: Murex maroccensis Gmelin,
1791 [Recent, west Africa]). Bouchet
and Warén (1985: 160) placed Sinistralia
in synonymy with Fusinus. Records of F.
maroccensis (Gmelin, 1791) and F. elegans
(Reeve, 1848) from the Canary Islands are
probably erroneously based on misiden-
tification of the new species. Other
known sinistral Fusinus are restricted to
the Indian Ocean: F. barclayi (G.B. So-
werby, III, 1894) from Maurititus, F. ga-
llagheri Smythe and Chatfield, 1981 from
Ornan and F. somaliensis Smythe and
Chatfield, 1984 from Somalia. F. depictus
(G.B. Sowerby, II, 1880) is a doubtful spe-
cies which was described without loca-
lity. According to Smythe and Chat-
field, 1984 (p. 309) it is perhaps not a ma-
rine species. Anyway, F. depictus differs
from F. saundersi sp. nov. by the obviously
smooth surface with a distinct coloura-
tion, the conspicuously short spire and
the ventricose body whorl.
Fusinus saundersi sp. nov. (Figs. 1-16)
1978. Saunders, G.D.: 18-19 (as sinistral Fusinus from Lanzarote).
1982. Nordsieck, F.: 230, pl. 79, fig. 82.50 (as Sinistralia maroccensis).
1999. Hadorn, R. and E. Rolán, 1999: 44-45, fig. 21 (showing radula of F. saundersi as F. (Sinistra-
lia) maroccensis).
2004. Ardovini, R. and T. Cossignani: 174 (as Sinistralia maroccensis).
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 1-2) (MNCN 15.05/51.016) (19.6 x 8.1 mm, lv). - Paratype 1 (Figs.
3-4) (MHNS) (16.7 x 7.8 mm, lv). - Paratype 2 (MHNS) (16.6 x 7.6, lv) - Paratype 3 (Figs. 5-6) CRH
(17.0 x 7.4 mm, lv). - Paratype 4 CRH (14.7 x 6.2 mm, lv). - Paratype 5 CJH (14.8 x 6.3 mm, lv). -
Paratype 6 CKF (19.0 x 8.1 mm, 4d). Paratypes 1-5 from type locality, paratype 6 from the Canary
Islands, northwest Gran Canaria, Sardina, 3 m deep.
86
Hadorn AND RoláN: Two new Fusinus from the Canary Islands
Figures 1-13. Fusinus saundersi sp. nov. 1,2: holotype (MNCN 15.03/31.016), Canary Islands, Lanzarote,
Punta Quemada, 3-15 m deep, 19.6 mm; 3, 4: paratype 1 (MHNS), Canary Islands, Lanzarote, Punta
Quemada, 3-15 m deep, 16.7 mm; 5, 6: paratype 3 (CRH), Canary Islands, Lanzarote, Punta Quemada,
3-15 m deep, 17.0 mm; 7, 8: shell (CRH), colour form, Canary Islands, northwest Gran Canaria,
Sardina, 15.3 mm; 9: protoconch; 10: microsculpture of the protoconch; 11: operculum, shell size 5.0
mm; 12: animal, drawing, shell size 13.5 mm; 13: detail of the soft parts (P= penis); 14: penis; 15:
periostracum from a paratype; 16: radula, shell size 5.0 mm; 17: Radula, shell size 13.5 mm.
Figuras 1-13. Fusinus saundersi sp. nov.. 1, 2: holotipo (MNCN, 15.05/51.016), Islas Canarias, Lanzarote,
Punta Quemada, 3-15 m de profundidad 19,6 mm; 3, 4: paratipo 1 (MHNS), Islas Canarias, Lanzarote,
Punta Quemada, 3-15 m de profundidad, 16,7 mm; 5, 6: paratipo 3 ( CRH), Islas Canarias, Lanzarote, Punta
Quemada, 3-15 m de profundidad, 17,0 mm; 7, 8: shell (CRH), forma de color, Islas Canarias, northwest
Gran Canaria, Sardina, 15,3 mm; 9: protoconcha; 10: microescultura de la protoconcha; 11: operculo, con-
cha de 5,0 mm; 12: dibujo del animal, concha de 13,5 mm; 13: detalle de las partes blandas (P- pene); 14:
pene; 15: periostraco de un paratipo; 16: radula, concha de 5,0 mm; 17: radula, concha de 13,5 mm.
87
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Additional material: Canary Islands, Rolán Collection 15657 (MHNS), 2 lv, 1 dd juv. - Canary
Islands, Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Rolán Collection 16128 (MHNS), 1 dd. - Canary Islands, north-
west Gran Canaria, Sardina, 15 m deep, CJH, 3 lv, 2 lv juv; CRH, 2 lv [in alcohol]. - Canary Islands,
northwest Gran Canaria, Sardina, 15 m deep, CJH, 17 dd juv.
Type locality: Punta Quemada, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, 3-15 m deep.
Etymology: Named after G.D. Saunders, the first author who recorded shells of this species.
Description: Shell (Figs. 1-8) small
(up to 25 mm), fusiform, sinistral, con-
sisting of about 8 convex whorls (inclu-
ding protoconch) with a slight subsutu-
ral concavity. Light brown to dark
brown, with a distinct white band at
periphery. Usually lighter coloured on
axial ribs, darker in the interspaces. A
uniformly light brown colour form
exists with darker brown interspaces
between axial ribs. Spire angle broad
(about 35-40°). Suture incised, wavy
according to the axial ribs of preceding
whorl.
Protoconch (Fig. 9) dark brown,
glossy, consisting of 1 % to 1 3á whorls.
Last part (14 whorl) ornamented with 4-
5 strong axial riblets, reaching from
suture to suture, separated by broad,
deep interspaces. Microsculpture (Fig.
10) of very small granules only in the
non eroded material. Diameter 0. 8-1.0
mm.
Axial sculpture consisting of broad,
oblique axial ribs, traversing from below
the subsutural concavity to the lower
suture; most prominent at periphery,
separated by narrow deep interspaces. 7
or 8 axial ribs on upper postnuclear
whorls, 9 on antepenultimate, 10 or 11
on penultimate and 11-13 on body
whorl. Fine axial growth lines are well
visible.
Spiral sculpture consisting of broad,
strong, rounded spiral cords, more pro-
minent when Crossing the axial ribs,
weaker in the interspaces. Teleoconch
beginning with 3 strong, light brown to
white coloured primary spiral cords; the
abapical cord strongest, the 2 abapical
cords usually lighter coloured. From the
second whorl onwards an additional
fine spiral cord appears below the 3
central cords, soon becoming as strong
as the subsutural cord. A fine secondary
spiral cord intercalated between the
primary cords on the penultimate and
body whorls. Some indistinct fine spiral
cords of different strength visible in the
subsutural area.
Aperture ovate, pinched at both
ends, brown coloured, the white band
well-visible inside the aperture. Outer
lip thin, edge slightly crenulated, with
numerous fine internal lirae. Parietal
callus thin, almost obsolete, smooth.
Columella smooth. Siphonal canal short,
slightly curved to the right and slightly
bending backwards, widely open. Aper-
ture and siphonal canal together about
2 h of total shell length.
Periostracum (Fig. 15) fine, light
brown, hairy.
Operculum (Fig. 11) corneous, light
brown, thin, ovate, filling aperture, ada-
pically rounded, abapically with termi-
nal nucleus, ornamented with fine con-
centric growth lines.
Radula (Figs. 16, 17) fasciolariid,
typical for genus. Central tooth tricus-
pid, elongate, with broad convex base
and narrow rounded tip. Lateral teeth
strongly curved, broad, with 8-10
strong, broad, rather short cusps with
incurved tips. At inner end with a small
denticle.
Animal (Figs. 12, 13) red with small
white spots, a large ctenidium with very
numerous lamellae, placed at right side.
The penis (Fig. 14) is placed behind the
left eye and is lanceolate, leaf shaped,
and relatively short.
Range and habitat: Canary Islands,
reported from Gran Canaria, Tenerife
and Lanzarote, live collected specimens
3-15 m deep.
Comparison: F. elegans (Reeve, 1848)
was erroneously placed in synonymy
with Fusus maroccensis (Gmelin, 1791) by
Tryon, 1881 (p. 66). F. elegans (Figs. 22-
24) differs from F. maroccensis (Figs. 18-
21) by the white or cream coloured shell,
the white protoconch, the weaker and
less conspicuous but somewhat broader
88
Hadorn AND RoláN: Two new Fusinus from the Canary Islands
Figures 18-21. Fusinus maroccensis (Gmelin, 1791). 18: original Figures in CHEMNITZ, 1788, pl.
105, figs. 896; 19: original Figure in REEVE, 1848, pl. 19, Fig. 72; 20, 21: West Morocco, oFF
Agadir, 17.9 mm (CRH). Figures 22-24. Fusinus elegans (Reeve, 1848). 22: original Figures in
REEVE, 1848, pl. 21, Figs. 87a-b; 23, 24: Western Sahara, Cape Barba, 32 m deep, 26.9 mm
(CJH). Figures 25-33. Fusinus hernandezi sp. nov., Canary Islands, northwest Gran Canaria, 28°
06’ 46” N, 15° 48’ 85” W, 150-200 m deep. 25, 26: holotype (MNCN 15.05/51.017), 16.4 mm;
27, 28: paratype 1 (MHNS), 14.0 mm; 29, 30: paratype 3 (CRH), 14.6 mm; 31: operculum; 32:
protoconch; 33: detail oF the periostracum.
Figuras 18-21. Fusinus maroccensis ( Gmelin , 1791). 18: figuras originales en CHEMNITZ, 1788,
lám. 105, figs. 896; 19: figuras originales en REEVE, 1848, lám. 19, fig. 72; 20, 21: Marruecos oeste,
frente a Agadir, 17,9 mm (CRH). Figuras 22-24. Fusinus elegans (Reeve, 1848). 22: figuras originales
en REEVE, 1848, lám. 21, figs. 87a-b; 23, 24: Sahara Occidental, Cabo Barba, 32 m de profundidad,
26,9 mm (CfH). Figuras 25-33. Fusinus hernandezi sp. nov., Islas Canarias, noroeste de Gran
Canaria, 28° 06 ’ 46” N, 15° 48’ 85” W, 150-200 m de profundidad. 25, 26: holotipo (MNCN
15.05/51.017), 16,4 mm; 27, 28: paratipo 1 (MHNS), 14,0 mm; 29, 30: paratipo 3 (CRH), 14,6
mm; 31: opérculo; 32: protoconcha; 33: detalle del periostracum.
89
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
axial ribs and the finer, less conspicuous
and more numerous spiral cords. The
smooth subsutural concavity in F.
elegans is only well visible in large adult
specimens.
F. elegans (Figs. 22-24) from the
Western Sahara differs from F. saundersi
sp. nov. by the white to cream coloured
shell, the white protoconch, the longer,
more delicate and more slender spire,
the whorls excavated below the suture
(only in adult specimens), the weaker
and less distinct white axial ribs, the
more close-set spiral cords and the sha-
llower interspaces between them.
F. maroccensis (Figs. 18-21) from West
Morocco differs from F. saundersi sp.
nov. by the light brown to cream colou-
red shell, the light brown protoconch,
the longer, more delicate and more
slender spire, the more incised suture,
the more convex whorls, the weaker,
narrower and slightly oblique white
axial ribs, the more prominent spiral
cords and the deeper grooves between
them.
Fusinus hernandezi sp. nov. (Figs. 25-33)
Type material: Holotype (Figs. 25-26) (MNCN 15.05/51.017) (16.4 x 7.7 mm, lv). - Paratype 1 (Figs.
27-28) (MHNS) (14.0 x 6.7 mm, lv). - Paratype 2 (CJH) (12.7 x 6.4 mm, lv). - Paratype 3 (Figs. 29-
30) (CRH) (14.6 x 6.9 mm, lv).
Additional material: 2 juvenile specimens (6.4 mm / 5.7 mm) from type locality (CJH). 1 shell (14.5
mm) from Canary Islands, northwest Gran Canaria, 28° 02' 049" N, 15° 52' 580" W, 250 m deep
(CFD).
Type locality: Northwest Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, 28° 06' 46" N, 15° 48' 85" W, 150-200 m
deep.
Etymology: Named after José María Hernández who collected the studied material.
Description: Shell (Figs. 25-30) small
(up to 17 mm), white with inconspi-
cuously brownish tinged interspaces
between axial ribs, fusiform, spire elon-
gate but rather broad, consisting of
about 7 convex whorls including proto-
conch. Suture constricted, incised, wavy
according to the axial sculpture of prece-
ding whorl.
Protoconch (Fig. 32) white to cream,
bulbous, smooth, glossy, consisting of 1
Vi whorls, last part (J4 whorl) ornamen-
ted with 4-6 axial riblets reaching from
suture to suture, becoming stronger and
broader towards the end of protoconch.
Diameter 0. 8-1.0 mm.
Axial sculpture consisting of about 9
or 10 strong, broad axial ribs per whorl,
11 or 12 on body whorl, reaching from
just below the upper suture to the lower
suture, separated by rather deep narrow
interspaces.
Spiral sculpture consisting of 5
rather fine, rounded, primary spiral
cords, separated by broad interspaces
and by 2 fine subsutural inconspicuous
cords. An intercalated fine secondary
spiral cord appears from the fourth
postnuclear whorl onwards.
Aperture round-ovate, white, with
about 10 or 11 strong internal lirae.
Outer lip crenulated. Parietal callus
adherent, thin, inconspicuous, smooth,
underlying spiral sculpture of the body
whorl well visible through the callus.
Columellar folds absent.
Siphonal canal about as long as
aperture length, open, slightly curved to
the left and backwards. Outer side orna-
mented alternating strong primary and
fine secondary spiral cords. Aperture
and siphonal canal together about Vi of
total shell length.
Periostracum (Fig. 33) thin, transpa-
rent, light brown, slightly hairy.
Operculum (Fig. 31) corneous, thin,
light brown, with terminal nucleus,
filling aperture.
Animal and radula were not studied
due to the scarcity of the material avai-
lable.
Range and habitat: Known only from
northwest Gran Canaria, Canary
Islands, 150-250 m deep.
90
Hadorn AND RoláN: Two new Fusinus from the Canary Islands
Figures 34, 33. Fusinus sectus (Locard, 1897), Holotype (MNHN), off Mauritania, 24.5 mm.
Figures 36, 37. Fusinus tenerifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999, Canary Islands, La Palma, Santa
Cruz de La Palma (CRH), 21.5 mm. Figures 38-41. Fusinus species, Canary Islands, northwest
Gran Canaria. 38, 39: 180 m deep, 39.3 mm (CJH); 40, 41: 280 m deep, 36.9 mm (CFD).
Figuras 34, 35. Fusinus sectus (Locard, 1897), Holotipo (MNHN), frente a Mauritania, 24,5 mm.
Figuras 36, 37. Fusinus tenerifensis Hadorn and Rolán, 1999, Islas Canarias, La Palma, Santa Cruz
de La Palma ( CRH), 21,5 mm. Figuras 38-4 1 . Fusinus species, Islas Canarias, noroeste de Gran Canaria.
38, 39: 180 m de profundidad, 39,3 mm (CJH); 40, 41: 280 m de profundidad, 36,9 mm (CFD).
Comparison: 2 large, dead, entirely
white specimens (Figs. 38-41) were
collected near the type locality (28° 07'
N, 15° 50' W, 180 m deep, 39.3 x 19.1
mm, CJH / 28° 03' 280" N, 15° 53' 708"
W, 280 m deep, 36.9 x 16.9 mm, CFD).
Both shells resemble superficially F. her-
nandezi sp. nov., but differ by the much
larger size, the smaller number (about 8-
10 per whorl) of stronger and broader
axial ribs and the wider interspaces
between them. Until more material is
collected, we prefer to leave this distinct
species undescribed.
F. sectus (Locard, 1897) (Figs. 34-35)
differs from F. hernandezi sp. nov. in the
less constricted suture, the less convex
whorls, the smaller number of strong
primary spiral cords with broader
interspaces between them, the conspi-
cuously large number of fine secondary
spiral cords mainly on the shoulder but
91
Iberus , 27 (2), 2009
also between the primary spiral cords,
and the less conspicuous axial ribs.
F. tener if ensis Hadorn and Rolán,
1999 (Figs. 36-37) differs from F. hernan-
dezi sp. nov. by the larger size, the more
elongate spire, the brown coloured shell
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the late José María
Hernández (Spain) and to Francisco
Déniz (Spain) for providing their mate-
rial for study and comparison and to
Koen Fraussen (Belgium) for advice and
reading the manuscript. The SEM
micrographs were made by Jesús
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ardovini R. and Cossignani T. 2004. West
African Seashells (including Azores, Madeira
and Canary Is.). LTnformatore Piceno, An-
cona. 319 pp.
Bouchet P. and Warén A. 1985. Revisión of
the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Ne-
ogastropoda excluding Turridae (Mollusca,
Gastropoda). Bolletino Malacologico, Suple-
mento 1:121-296, 723 figs.
Buzzurro G. and Russo P. 2007. Fusinus del
Mediterráneo - Mediterranean Fusinus. Pri-
vately published. Milano, 280 pp.
Chemnitz J.H. 1788. Neues Systematisches
Conchylien Cabinet, Vol. 10: 1-376, register
1-124, pls. 137-173.
Hadorn R. and Rolán E. 1999. Two new Fu-
sinus (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) from north-
west Africa and the Canary Islands, including
a brief description of the type material of Fu-
sinus crassus (Pallary, 1901). Argonauta 13(1):
39-47.
Hadorn R., Afonso C.M.L. and Rolán E.
2009. A new Fusinus (Gastropoda: Fasciola-
riidae) from the Algarve, south coast of Por-
tugal. Iberus 27(1): 119-129.
Hadorn R. and Ryall P. 1999. A new species
and a new subspecies of deep water Fusinus
(Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae) from the eas-
tern Atlantic. Argonauta 13(1): 35-38.
with brown protoconch, the more pro-
nounced axial sculpture, the deeper
interspaces between the axial ribs, the
smaller number of axial ribs, and the
stronger primary spiral cords with
strong intercalated secondary cords.
Méndez and Inés Pazos in the Centro de
Apoyo Científico y Tecnológico a la
Investigación (CACTI) of the University
of Vigo, Spain. We thank also Virginie
Héros, Muséum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, Paris, France, for the loan of
type material.
Nordsieck F. 1982. Die europáischen Meeres-
Geháuseschnecken (Prosobranchia) vom Eis-
meer bis Kapverden, Mittelmeer und
Schwarzes Meer. 2. vollig neu bearbeitete
und erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Gustav
Fischer Verlag. i-xii, 1-539 pp., pl. 1-108.
Reeve L.A. 1847-1848. [Monograph of the ge-
nus Fusus]. Conchologia Iconica 4: [unpagi-
neted text], pls. 1-21. [pls. 1-14, 1847; pls. 15-
21, 1848],
Sabelli B., Glannuzzi-Savelli R. and Bedulli
D. 1990. Catalogo annotato dei molluschi
marini del Mediterráneo. Societá Italiana di
Malacologia. Bologna: Librería Naturalistica
Bolognese 1: i-xiv, 1-348.
Saunders G.D. 1978. Sinistral Fusinus from
Lanzarote (Canary Islands). La Conchiglia 10
(110/111): 18-19.
Smythe K. and Chatfield J. 1984. Fusinus ( Si -
nistralia ) somaliensis: a new species of whelk
from Mogadiscio, Somalia. The Journal ofCon-
chology 31: 307-310.
Tryon G.W. 1880-1881. Manual of conchology,
structural and systematic, with illustrations
of the species. Volume 3. Tritonidae, Fusidae,
Buccinidae. Philadelphia. 310 pp., 87 pls. [5-
64, 1880; 65-310, 1881],
92
Iberia, 27 (2): 93-98, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Two new species of Putzeysia (Prosobranchia,
Chilodontidae) from the Canary Islands
Dos nuevas especies de Putzeysia (Prosobranchia, Chilodontidae) de
las islas Canarias
Winfried ENGL* and Emilio HOLÁN**
Recibido el 23-III-2009. Aceptado el l-X-2009
ABSTRACT
Two new species of the genus Putzeysia are described, showing the shell characters,
including protoconch and microsculpture; the new species are compared with the only
known Mediterranean species for the genus, P. wiseri.
RESUMEN
Se describen dos nuevas especies del género Putzeysia, presentándose las caracterís-
ticas de la concha, incluida la protoconcha y la microescultura; las nuevas especies se
comparan con la única de este género que se conoce en el mar Mediterráneo, P.
wiseri.
INTRODUCTION
In Europe, only one species of the
genus Putzeysia Sulliotti, 1889 was
known hitherto: Putzeysia wiseri (Calcara,
1842), which is well illustrated in Gian-
nuzzi-Savelli, Pusateri, Palmeri and
Ebreo (1994, fig. 263) and Ardovini and
Cossign ani (1999: 34).
In the material collected in several
dredgings in the Canary Islands, numer-
ous shells of a minute species group were
found. In Engl (1994) these specimens were
identified as P. wiseri in spite of differences
in the height/ width range. After a more
detailed comparison (mainly through scan-
ning electrón microscopy) of this materi-
al with the Mediterranean species, two
closely similar but different species are
described as new in the present work.
* Kolner Str. 231. 40227 Dusseldorf, Germany
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario
Abbreviations
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural, San-
tiago de Compostela
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
MNHN Museum National d'Histoire
Naturelle, París
MNHC Museo de la Naturaleza y el
Hombre, Santa Cruz de Tenerife
SMNH Seckenberg Museum Natural
History,
ZMH Zoologisches Museum, Ham-
burg
ZMB Zoologisches Museum, Berlin
ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung,
München,
CWE Collection of Winfried Engl
Sur, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
93
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
SYSTEM ATICS
Superfamily Seguenzioidea Verrill, 1884
Family Chilodontidae Wenz, 1938
Subfamily Chilodontinae
Genus Putzeysia Sulliotti, 1889
Type species: Trochus clathratus Aradas, 1847 [= Trochus zviseri Calcara 1842].
Putzeysia franziskae spec. nov. (Figs. 3, 7, 8, 11-13)
Type material: Holotype (ZSM 20090099)(Figs. 3, 7) and five paratypes (ZSM 20090100). Other
paratypes in the following collections: MHNS (1), MNCN (1), MNHC (1), MNHN (1), SMNH (2),
ZMH (2), ZMB (2), CWE (100) (all ex CWE, collected from 1975 to 2000).
Type locality: Puerto del Carmen, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, 30-50 m.
Etymology: This species is named after Franziska, the mother of the first author.
Description : Shell (Figs. 3) turbinoid,
globose, with 4-4 % spiral whorls of a
rather quick development, last one
rounded, representing more that 60 % of
the total height. Protoconch (Fig. 7) with
less than one whorl, a diameter of 290 jum
and a nucleus of about 110 pm. Under
strong magnification (Fig. 8) a microsculp-
ture consisting of irregular shapes is
observed, as well as 2 fine oblique threads.
Teleoconch whorls with axial ribs: 12 on
the first whorl, 14-16 on the second, about
30 on the last whorl, which are strongly
prosocline, and narrower than the inter-
spaces. The spiral cords are not present on
the first teleoconch whorl; near the end of
the second a small thread appears in the
upper part, Crossing over the axial ribs,
forming nodules at the Crossing points; in
the third whorl there are three well
defined spiral cords, and, on the last
whorls, there are five, the subsutural one
smaller and cióse to the next one. Below
the end of the spire, there are five nodu-
lous cords down to the base. The
microsculpture (Figs. 11-13) is formed by
small, short and interrupted threads which
are present on the whole surface. Aper-
ture rounded, peristome sharp, serrated
due to the end of the spiral cords. There
is an internal thickening on which 5-7
rounded nodules can be seen. No umbili-
cus. The columella is straight, with an
everted border. Colour dirty white.
Dimensions : The holotype has a
height of 3.5 mm.
Distribution : Presently known only
from Lanzarote.
Remarks : The assignation of the
present species to the genus Putzeysia
was based on the description of this
genus in Wenz (1938: 282) and the simi-
larity with the European species P. wiseri
(Calcara, 1842). Anyway, both species are
very different because the new one is
smaller than P. zviseri (which can reach 5.6
mm height: Figs. 1-2); the protoconchs
are similar, but that of P. zviseri is some-
what larger (310 jum), less sculptured, the
first whorl of the teleoconch has 17 axial
ribs (vs. 12), and the microsculpture is
denser.
Putzeysia juttae spec. nov. (Figs. 4, 9, 10, 14-16)
Type material: Holotype (ZSM 20090101)(Figs. 4, 13) and five paratypes (ZSM 20090102). Paratypes
in the following collections: MHNS (1), MNCN (1), MNHC (1), MNHN (1), SMNH (2), ZMH (2),
ZMB (2), CWE (50) (all ex CWE, collected from 1999 to 2000).
Type locality: La Restinga, El Hierro, Canary Islands, 30-60 m.
Etymology: The species is named after Jutta Baumgartel, the wife of the leader of the diving school in
acknowledgement for her help to the first author in many aspects of collecting, for the last ten years.
94
ENGL AND RoláN: Two new species of Putzeysia from the Canary Islands
Figures 1-5. Shells of Putseysia spp, all to scale. 1, 2: Putzeysia wiseri (Calcara, 1842), 5.6 mm,
Banca di Santa Lucia, Livorno, Italy, 400 m (CWE); 3: P. franziskae spec. nov. holotype, 3.5 mm,
Lanzarote (ZSM); 4: P. juttae spec. nov., holotype, 3.8 mm, El Hierro (ZSM); 5: P. cf. juttae, Los
Cancajos, Santa Cruz de La Palma, 40 m (CWE).
Figuras 1-5. Conchas de Putseysia spp, a la misma escala. 1, 2: Putzeysia wiseri (Calcara, 1842), 5,6
mm, Banca di Santa Lucia, Livorno, Ltalia, 400 m (CWE); 3: P. franziskae spec. nov. holotipo, 3,5
mm, Lanzarote (ZSM); 4: P. juttae spec. nov., holotipo, 3,8 mm, El Hierro (ZSM); 5: P. cf. juttae. Los
Cancajos, Santa Cruz de La Palma, 40 m ( CWE).
Description: Shell (Fig. 4) turbinoid,
globose, with 4-4 3á spiral whorls of a
rather quick development, last one
rounded, representing more that 60 % of
the total height. Protoconch (Fig. 9) with
less than one whorl, a diameter of 270
pm and a nucleus of about 160 jUm.
Under strong magnification (Fig. 10), a
microsculpture formed by small irregu-
lar projections can be observed. Teleo-
conch whorls with axial ribs: 16 on the
first whorl, 17-18 on the second, 24-26
on the last whorl, which are strongly
prosocline and narrower than the inter-
spaces. The spiral cords are not present
on the first teleoconch whorl; near the
middle of the second whorl a small
thread appears on the upper part, Cross-
ing over the axial ribs, forming nodules
at the Crossing points and increasing
slowly; on the third whorl there are
three well defined cords and, on the last
95
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figures 6-10. Protoconchs. 6: Putzeysia wiseri Santa Lucia (Livorno), Italy, 440 m; 7, 8: P.
franziskae spec. nov. Lanzarote (ZSM); 9, 10: P. juttae spec. nov., El Hierro (ZSM).
Figures 6-10. Protoconchas. 6: Putzeysia wiseri Santa Lucia (Livorno), Ltalia, 440 m; 7, 8: P.
franziskae spec. nov. Lanzarote (ZSM); 9, 10: P. juttae spec. nov., El Hierro (ZSM).
whorl, there are five, the subsutural one
a little smaller in some shells than the
subsequent ones. Below the end of the
spire, there are four nodulous cords
down to the base. The microsculpture
(Figs. 14-16) is formed by small, short
and interrupted spiral threads which are
present on the first whorls. On the
remaining shell surface numerous
growth lines with many prominent
tubercles can be seen under strong mag-
nification. Aperture rounded, peristome
narrow, serrated due to the ends of the
spiral cords. There is an internal thick-
96
Engl AND RoláN: Two new species of Putzeysia from the Canary Islands
Figures 11-16. Details of microsculpture. 11-13: P. franziskae spec. nov., Lanzarote (ZSM); 14-16:
P. juttae spec. nov., El Hierro (ZSM).
Figuras 11-16. Detalles de microescultura. 11-13: P. franziskae spec. nov., Lanzarote (ZSM); 14-16: P.
juttae spec. nov., El Hierro (ZSM).
97
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
ening on which 6-7 rounded nodules
can be seen. No umbilicus, but a narro w
fissure. The columella is straight
forming an everted border. Colour dirty
white.
Dimensions : The holotype has a
height of 3.8 mm.
Distribution : Known only from El
Hierro, although one shell from La
Palma (Fig. 5) could belong to this
species.
Remarks: Putzeysia juttae spec. nov. is
rather similar to Putzeysia franziskae
spec. nov. and for this reason the differ-
ences with P. wiseri are the same as those
previously mentioned, although it has
15 axial ribs on the first teleoconch
whorl. It can be separated from
Putzeysia franziskae because the latter has
more axial ribs and cords at the base; the
protoconch has a larger nucleus, and the
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Jesús Méndez
and Inés Pazos of the Centro de Apoyo
Científico y Tecnológico (CACTI) of the
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ardovini R. and Cossignani T. 1999. Atlante
delle conchiglie di profonditd del Mediterráneo.
L'Informatore Piceno Ed., Ancona. 111 pp.
Giannuzzi-Savelli R., Pusateri F., Palmeri A.
and Ebreo C. 1994. Atlante delle conchiglie
marine del Mediterráneo. Vol. 1. La Conchiglia
ed., Roma. 125 pp.
Dautzenberg P. and Fischer H. 1896. Dra-
gages effectués par l'Hirondelle et par la
Princesse Alice 1888-1895. 1. Mollusques Gas-
tropodes. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de
Prance, 9: 395-498, pl. 15-22.
microsculpture has a predominance of
the very tuberculated axial growth lines
instead of the irregular spiral threads
which appears in Putzeysia juttae.
The presence of these two different
species within one archipelago is surpris-
ing, considering that other cióse trochoid
species with a similar protoconch do not
show appreciable differences within one
island or seamount group. In the genus
Danilia, Dautzenberg and Fischer (1896)
distinguished Danilia affinis as a different
species from the Azores, but in the
Canary islands we find the same species
as in continental Europe. Something
similar occurs with the genus Clelandella
(see Gofas, 2005) which has different
species in the Lusitanian bañes and in the
Meteor group of seamounts, but shows
no differentiation within seamounts or
islands of the same group.
University of Vigo for the SEM pho-
tographs, and Antonio A. Monteiro for
the English correction.
Engl W. 1995. Putzeysia wiseri (Archaeogas-
tropoda, Trochidae) a common species at
Lanzarote Is. (Canary Islands, Spain). No-
tiziario CISMA , 16: 23-26.
Gofas S. 2005. Geographical differentiation in
Clelandella (Gastropoda: Trochidae) in the
northeastern Atlantic. Journal of Molluscan
Studies, 71 (2): 133-144.
Wenz W. 1938-1944. Handbuch der Palaozoologie.
6. Gastropoda, I. Allgemeiner Teil und Proso-
branchia. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. 1638
pp.
98
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus , 27 (2): 99-105, 2009
Moluscos continentales de los alrededores de Molina de
Aragón (Guadalajara, España), con notas sobre Orculella
bulgarica (Hesse, 1915) (Gastropoda, Orculidae)
Non-marine molluscs of the surroundings of Molina de Aragón
(Guadalajara, Spain), with notes on Orculella bulgarica (Hesse,
1915) (Gastropoda, Orculidae)
Fernando ROBLES* y Alberto MARTÍNEZ-ORTÍ**
Recibido el 17-VI-2009. Aceptado el l-X-2009
RESUMEN
La fauna malacológica de los alrededores de Molina de Aragón (Guadalajara) está com-
puesta por al menos 35 especies, 27 terrestres y ocho acuáticas, de las que 10 habían
sido citadas anteriormente. La forma descrita como Pupo dolium Draparnaud var. nova
por Westerlund (1 897) se asigna a Orculella bulgarica (Hesse, 1915), de acuerdo con la
revisión del material original. Esta especie está presente en 35 localidades del este de la
Península Ibérica, distribuidas desde el límite Plio-Pleistoceno hasta la actualidad y ha
sufrido una importante regresión en su extensión geográfica, que se limita en el presente
a escasas localidades conocidas en un área muy restringida de la provincia de Granada.
ABSTRACT
The malacological fauna of the surroundings of Molina de Aragón (Guadalajara, Spain) is
composed by at least 35 species, 27 terrestrial and eight aquatic, of which 10 had been
mentioned previously. The morph described as Pupa dolium Draparnaud var. nova by
Westerlund (1897) has been assigned to Orculella bulgarica (Hesse, 1915), following
revisión of the original material. This species is present in 35 localities of eastern Iberian
Península, distributed from the Plio-Pleistocene boundary to present, and has suffered an
important regression in its geographical extensión. Nowadays it is only known from few
localities in a very restricted area of the Granada province.
INTRODUCCIÓN
Westerlund (1897) describió una
variedad de " Pupa dolium Drp.", indi-
cando que se trataba de una nueva
variedad. El hecho de que se publicase
en una corta nota presentada por el
geólogo Salvador Calderón a la Socie-
dad Española de Historia Natural y
publicada en las Actas de dicha Socie-
dad, dentro de una lista de "moluscos
recogidos por él en Molina de Aragón"
(sic), ha propiciado que este taxon haya
pasado desapercibido por los malacólo-
* Departamento de Geología. Facultat de Biología. Universitat de Valencia, d Dr. Moliner 50. E-46100
Burjassot (Valencia, España). Email: Fernando.Robles@uv.es
** Departamento de Zoología. Facultat de Biología. Universitat de Valencia y Museu Valencia d’FIistória
Natural. Passeig de la Petxina, 15. 46008 Valencia. Email: alberto.martinez@uv.es
99
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
gos que se han ocupado de revisar la
fauna de Pupillacea de la Península
Ibérica. Los autores han muestreado en
reiteradas ocasiones los alrededores de
Molina de Aragón, en busca de ejempla-
res que puedan asignarse a este taxon,
con resultados negativos. Sin embargo
se ha localizado la muestra original,
estudiada por Westerlund, que se
encuentra depositada en el Museo
Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. La revi-
sión de este material ha permitido
aclarar el estatuto taxonómico de esta
especie, así como establecer la natura-
leza, actual o fósil, de estos ejemplares,
que en la nota de Calderón se prestaba a
confusión. Por otra parte, los resultados
obtenidos en las prospecciones de los
autores aportan nueva información
sobre la composición de la fauna mala-
cológica de un área poco estudiada
hasta ahora. De hecho, la lista de Wes-
terlund, publicada por Calderón
(1897), sólo incluye las 10 especies
siguientes: Cornu aspersum (O.F. Müller,
1774) (citada como Helix aspersa Müll.),
Iberus gualterianus alonensis (Férussac,
1821) ( Helix alonensis Fer.), Xerosecta ari-
gonis (Schmidt, 1853) ( Helix Arigoi
(Rossm.) Bgt.), Cernuella virgata (Da
Costa, 1778) ( Helix Dantezi Kob., Helix
lauta Lowe, Helix luteata Farr.), ¿ Helicella
madritensis ? (Rambur, 1868) ( Helix irrita
(Berth.) Bgt.), Cochlicella acuta (O.F.
Müller, 1774) ( Helix acuta Müll.), Zebrina
detrita (O.F. Müller, 1774) ( Buliminus
detritus Müll.), Jaminia quadridens quadri-
dens (O.F. Müller, 1774) ( Buliminus qua-
dridens Müll.), Oxyloma elegans (Risso,
1826) ( Succinea Pfeifferi Rossm. var. elata
Band.) y Orculella bulgarica (Hesse, 1915)
(Pupa dolium Drp. var. nova West.).
MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS
La recogida de muestras se realizó
los días 1, 2 y 3 de Noviembre de 2002:
Las muestras se encuentran depositadas
en el Museu Valencia d'História Natural
de Valencia. Las muestras fósiles se
encuentran en la colección Robles
(Departamento de Geología de la Uni-
versitat de Valencia). La determinación
de las especies se ha realizado por las
características conquiológicas y, cuando
estas no han sido suficientes, se ha reali-
zado la disección y el estudio del
aparato reproductor de los ejemplares.
Se han examinado dos muestras de
"Pupa dolium var. nova" depositadas en
el Museo Nacional de Ciencias Natura-
les de Madrid, MNCN-15.05/37017 (11
conchas) y MNCN-s/n (col. Azpeitia
n°2481) (5 conchas), ambas procedentes
de la recolección original de Calderón.
RESULTADOS
Moluscos de los alrededores de
Molina de Aragón (Guadalajara)
Se han muestreado seis localidades,
con los resultados que se indican en la
Tabla I.
Sobre la identidad de "Pupa dolium
Draparnaud. var. nova" (Westerlund
1897)
Calderón (1897) indica que "se
hallan en enormes cantidades las citadas
variedades de Succinea Pfeifferi y Pupa
dolium en los parajes que se encharcan
durante la mayor parte del año en
aquella región extremadamente
húmeda". Esta observación parece
indicar que se trata de especies actuales,
que viven en la región. Sin embargo, en
los muéstreos realizados se han reco-
gido numerosos ejemplares vivos de
Oxyloma elegans (a la que sin duda se
refiere la cita de Westerlund de "Succi-
nea Pfeifferi Rossm. var. elata Band.")
pero no se ha hallado ningún ejemplar,
actual o fósil, de Orculella bulgarica (a la
que se refiere la cita de "Pupa dolium
Drp. var nova" , como comentamos más
adelante).
La consulta realizada al Stockholm
Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet (K. Sinde-
mark, e-mail del 26 de Agosto de 2002)
y al Góteborgs Naturhistoriska
Museum (T. Nordander, e-mail de 2 de
Septiembre de 2002), en los que está
depositada la colección Westerlund, ha
dado resultado negativo. Las muestras
estudiadas están depositadas en la
Colección Malacológica del Museo
100
ROBLES Y MartÍNEZ-OrtÍ: Moluscos continentales de Molina de Aragón
Tabla I. Listado de especies halladas en los alrededores de Molina de Aragón (Guadalajara). Puntos
de muestreo: (1). Junto a Fábrica en la salida de Molina, aguas abajo del río Gallo, chopera en el
margen izquierdo (UTM: 30TWL939213). (2). Márgenes del río Gallo, 2 km aguas abajo de
Molina. Chopera (UTM: 30TWL898228). (3). Margen izquierda del río Gallo, chopera aguas
arriba de Molina (UTM: 30TWL936214). (4). Margen derecha del río Gallo, a la salida de
Molina. Presa y secano (UTM: 30TWL945 194). (3). El Ponce. (UTM: 30TWL971207). (6).
Subida al Castillo (UTM: 30TWL937223).
Table I. List ofspecies collected in the surroundings of Molina de Aragón ( Guadalajara). Sites: (1). Near
a factory in Molina, downstream Gallo river, poplar woods on the left river bank UTM:
3 0 TWL93 9213). (2). Gallo river banks, 2 km downstream from Molina. Poplar (UTM:
30TWL898228). (3). Gallo left river bank, poplar woods upstream from Molina (UTM:
30TWL936214). (4). Right bank of Gallo river, in Molina. Reservoir and dry field (UTM:
30TWL945194). (5). El Ponce (UTM: 30TWL971207). (6). Uphill towards the Castle (UTM:
30TWL937223).
101
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figuras 1 , 2. Orculella bulgarica de Molina de Aragón (Guadalajara, España), (MNCNs/n, col. Azpeitia
n°2481; H=7,25 mm; 0=3,20 mm). 1: ejemplar; 2: detalle de la escultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 1, 2. Orculella bulgarica of Molina de Aragón ( Guadalajara, Spain), (MNCNs/n, Azpeitia
coll. n°2481; H=7.25 mm; 0=3.20 mm). 1: specimen; 2: detail of the protoconch sculpture.
Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de
Madrid y están compuestas por un total
de 16 conchas en buen estado de con-
servación. La disposición de los plie-
gues en la abertura coincide con la indi-
cada en la descripción original (Wester-
lund in Calderón, 1897: 52): "plica parie-
talis inmersa, brevi, tenui et plicis colume-
llaribus profundissimis obsoletus dis-
tincta". La morfología de la teleoconcha
y la microescultura de la protoconcha
(Figs. 1, 2) permiten asignar esta varie-
dad a O. bulgarica, de acuerdo con las
detalladas descripciones de esta especie
realizadas por Gittenberger (1983) y
Garrido et al. (2005). Las medidas de
las conchas (Tabla II) quedan dentro de
la variabilidad indicada por estos
autores.
Las ejemplares estudiados no han
sido recogidos vivos. Carecen de perios-
traco y presentan la abertura rellena de
sedimento. Sin embargo, la comparación
de su estado de conservación con el que
presentan otras muestras de diversa
edad geológica (véase más adelante),
incluso holocenas, parece indicar un
carácter muy reciente de las conchas de
Molina de Aragón.
O. bulgarica fue descrita originaria-
mente en Bulgaria y ha sido citada pos-
teriormente en Rusia, Armenia y
Turquía (véase información detallada en
Garrido et al., 2005). Es una especie
ampliamente representada en el Este de
la Península Ibérica desde el Plio-Pleis-
toceno hasta la actualidad, que ha
sufrido una fuerte regresión de su área
102
ROBLES Y MartÍNEZ-OrtÍ: Moluscos continentales de Molina de Aragón
Tabla II. Dimensiones de los ejemplares de “Pupa dolium var. nova” West, depositadas en el
MNCN de Madrid.
Table II. Dimensions of the specimens of Tupa dolium var. nova” West, stored in the MNCN of
Madrid.
de distribución. Dado que en las revisio-
nes existentes (Gittenberger, 1983;
Garrido, Arrébola y Bertrand, 2005;
Arrebola y Garrido, 2008) se mencio-
nan solamente unas pocas localidades,
presentamos a continuación una recopi-
lación de la distribución de esta especie
(Fig. 3), basada en la información biblio-
gráfica existente y en nuestros propios
datos inéditos. La lista se ha confeccio-
nado teniendo en cuenta la edad de las
muestras y su localización geográfica,
con las coordenadas UTM. Se añade la
referencia bibliográfica cuando la locali-
dad ha sido publicada previamente y el
nombre del recolector (indicado por !),
cuando se conoce.
Plio-Pleistoceno :
1. - Hellín (Albacete). 30SXH16.
Jodot (1959). (Birot y Solé Sabarís!).
2. - Almenara (Castellón). Yacimiento
Casablanca 1. 30SYK40. Bech, Villalta
y Abad (1997). (J.F. de Villalta!, Martí-
nez-Ortí!)
3. - Cofrentes (Valencia). 30SXJ64.
Inédito. (Robles y Ruano!).
Pleistoceno medio :
4. - Ambrona (Soria). 30TWL45.
Preece (1991) (Preece!).
5. - Redueñas (Madrid). 30TVL41.
Inédito. (Hoyos y Robles!).
6. - Barranco de Pedro (Villarta,
Cuenca). 30TXJ27. Inédito. (Collado y
Robles!).
7. - Ermita de la Consolación
(Villarta, Cuenca). 30TXJ26. Inédito.
(Collado y Robles!).
8. - Mudarra (Huete, Cuenca).
30TWK24. Inédito (Daams!).
9. - Cúllar de Baza (Granada)
30SWG35. Robles (1989). (Alberdi!).
Pleistoceno superior:
10. - Can Ubach y Cementerio viejo
de Rubí (Barcelona). 31TDF19. Almera
(1894-1907); Almera y Bofill (1898);
Bofill y Haas (1920). (Almera!).
11. - km 8,6 de la CC-1413, cerca de
Rubí (Barcelona). 31TDF19. Abad, Puis-
ségur y Calzada (1986).
12. - Vélez Rubio (Almería).
30SWG86. Brunnacker y Lozek (1969).
(Brunnacker!).
13. - Almansa (Albacete). 30SXJ60.
Inédito. (Robles y Ruano!).
Pleistoceno indiferenciado:
14. - Santes Creus (Tarragona).
31TCF67. Inédito (Torrens!)
15. - Horna (Guadalajara), 6 km al
SW de Medinaceli. 30TWL45. Gitten-
berger (1983). Preece (1991). (Preece!).
16. - Riotovi (Soria), 13 km al W de
Medinaceli (Guadalajara) 30TWL35.
Gittenberger (1983), Preece (1991).
(Preece!).
17. - 0,4 km al NE de Galera
(Granada). 30SWG37. Gittenberger
(1993). (Falkner!).
18. - Turbera de Padul (Granada).
30SVF49. Madurga (1970, 1973).
Holoceno:
19. - Cerro de la Virgen. Orce
(Granada). 30SWG47. Gittenberger
(1983) (Falkner!).
20. - Baides (Guadalajara), 20 km al
SW de Medinaceli. 30TWL23. Gitten-
berger (1983), Preece (1991). (Preece!).
(Ca. 2640 + 70 años).
21. - Bicorp (Valencia). Inédito.
30SXJ93 (Peñalver!).
103
Iberus , 27 (2), 2009
Figura 3. Distribución, actual y fósil, de Orculella bulgarica en la Península Ibérica (cuadrado:
población actual; círculos blancos: poblaciones subactuales y recientemente extinguidas; círculos
negros: poblaciones fósiles).
Figure 3. Distribution, recent and fossil, o/Orculella bulgarica in the Iberian Península (square: recent
population; open áreles: subrecent and recently extinct populations; closed áreles: fossil populations).
Subactual y actual:
22. - Molina de Aragón (Guadala-
jara). 30TWL92. Westerlund en Calde-
rón (1897). Subactual.
23. - Fuente Alta de Potrera
(Granada). 30SVG72. Garrido et al.
(2005). Actual.
24. - Venta del Río de Cortes
(Granada). 30SVG83. Garrido et al.
(2005). Actual (extinguido).
25. - Fuente Seca de Cortes. 30SVG83.
Garrido et al. (2005). Actual (extinguido).
26. - Fuente de la Rambla de la Viña.
30SVG82. Garrido et al. (2005) Actual
(extinguido).
27-32.- Arrébola y Garrido (2008)
señalan la existencia de otras cinco
poblaciones y una sexta localidad sólo
con conchas recientes, sin indicar la
situación exacta dentro de la provincia
de Granada.
Sin datos o dudoso:
33. - Cerca de la estación de Martorell
(Barcelona). 31TDF19. Almera y Bofill
(1898), Bofill y Haas (1920).
34. - Terrasa (Barcelona). 31TDG10.
Bofill y Haas (1920) (Almera y Bofill!).
35. - Torrelles de Llobregat (Barce-
lona). 31TDF17. Bech, Villalta y Abad
(1997) (J. Bech!).
104
ROBLES Y Martinez-OrtÍ: Moluscos continentales de Molina de Aragón
CONCLUSIONES
De acuerdo con nuestras prospeccio-
nes, la fauna malacológica de los alrede-
dores de Molina de Aragón se compone
de al menos 35 especies, de las que sola-
mente 10 habían sido citadas previa-
mente. De ellas, 27 son especies terrestres
y ocho viven en ambientes acuáticos.
La cita de " Pupa dolium Drap. var.
nova" por Westerlund corresponde a
Orculella burgarica (Hesse). La especie no
ha vuelto a ser encontrada, pero el
estudio de la muestra original indica
que los ejemplares fueron recogidos
muertos, por lo que esta especie debe de
ser eliminada del catálogo de moluscos
actuales de la región.
El análisis de la distribución de esta
especie, actual y fósil, en la Península
Ibérica permite constatar la fuerte regre-
sión que ha sufrido a lo largo del
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Abad A., Puisségur J.J. y Calzada S. 1986.
Nuevo yacimiento de moluscos fósiles en el
Würm de Rubí (Barcelona, España). Geoga-
ceta, 1: 41-42
Almera J. 1894-1907. Descripción de las terre-
nos pliocénicos de la Cuenca del Bajo Llo-
bregat y Llano de Barcelona. Memorias de la
Real Academia de Ciencias y Artes de Barcelona,
3: 1-335.
Almera J. y Bofill y Poch A. 1989. Moluscos
fósiles recogidos en los terrenos pliocénios de
Cataluña. Boletín de la Comisión del Mapa Ge-
ológico de España, 24: 1-222.
Arrebola J.R. y Garrido J.A. 2008. Orculella bul-
garica (Hesse, 1915). Pp. 601-603. En Barea-
Azcón J.M., Ballesteros-Duperón E y Mo-
reno D. (coords.): Libro Rojo de los Invertebra-
dos de Andalucía. 4 Tomos. Consejería de
Medio Ambiente, funta de Andalucía, 1430
pp., Sevilla.
Bech M., Villalta J.F. de y Abad A. 1997.
Moliuscs Continentals del Pliocé Superior del
Jaciment de Casablanca I (Almenara, Caste-
lló de la Plana). Batalleria, 7: 25-29.
Bofill A. y Haas F. 1920. Estudi sobre la ma-
lacologia de les valls pirenaiques. Conca del
Llobregat. Treballs del Museu de Ciéncies Na-
turals de Barcelona, 3 (Serie zoológica, 13): 381-
831.
Brunnacker K. y Lozek V. 1969. Loss-Vorkom-
men in Sudostspanien. Zeitschrift für Geo-
morphologie, N.F., 13: 297-316.
tiempo. Se conocen 35 localidades repar-
tidas entre el límite Plio-Pleistoceno y la
actualidad, de las que ocho permane-
cían inéditas y solamente en seis de ellas
la especie continúa viviendo hoy en día.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Al Dr. Torsten Nordander (Góte-
borgs Naturhistoriska Museum) y a
Mrs. Karin Sindemark (Stockholm
Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet) por su
información sobre la colección Wester-
lund. Al Dr. Oscar Soriano por el envío
del material del MNCN de Madrid y al
Dr. Enrique Peñalver por su colabora-
ción en los muéstreos. Finalmente al
S.C.S.I.E. de la Universitat de Valencia
por su ayuda en la realización de la foto-
grafía realizada en el M.E.B Hitachi S-
4100.
Calderón S. 1897. Moluscos recogidos en
Molina de Aragón. Actas de la Sociedad Espa-
ñola de Historia Natural (Segunda serie), 6 (26):
52-53.
Garrido J.A., Arrébola J.R. y Bertrand M.
2005. Extant populations of Orculella bulgar-
ica (Hesse, 1915) in Iberia. Journal ofConchol-
ogy, 38 (6): 653-662.
Gittenberger E. 1983. Beitráge zur Kenntnis der
Pupillacea. IX. Nochmals über Orculidae.
Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie
van Wetenschappen, C86 (3): 325-342.
Jodot P. 1959. Les faunes de mollusques conti-
nentaux reparties dans le sud-est de l'Es-
pagne entre le Miocéne supérieur et le Qua-
ternaire. Memorias y comunicaciones del Insti-
tuto Geológico de la Diputación Provincial de
Barcelona, 17: 1-133.
Madurga Marco M.C. 1970. Gasterópodos
cuaternarios del Padul (Granada). Boletín de
la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural
(Sección Geológica), 68: 259-264
Madurga Marco M.C. 1973. Los gasterópodos
dulceacuícolas y terrestres del Cuaternario
español. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de
Historia Natural (Sección Geológica), 71: 43-165
Preece R.C. 1991. Radiocarbon-dated mollus-
can successions from the Holocene of central
Spain. Journal of Biogeography, 18: 409-426.
Robles F. 1989. Moluscos continentales del Plio-
Pleistoceno de la cuenca de Guadix-Baza.
Trabajos Neógeno-Cuaternario, 11:127-138.
105
Iberus , 27 (2): 107-112, 2009
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Geographical notes on Iberian Caudofoveata (Mollusca)
Notas geográficas sobre los Caudofoveata (Mollusca) ibéricos
Luitfried v. SALVINI-PLAWEN*
Recibido el 29-IV-2009. Aceptado el 2-X-2009
ABSTRACT
New records of Caudofoveata from samplings off Barcelona and off Galicia are pre-
sented. They concern Chaetodermaf?) strigisquamatum transferred to Folcidens and F. vas-
coniensis as well as two other species of Falcidens and two of Prochoetodermo s.l. This
represents a noteworthy enlargement of the known geographical distribution. Some orga-
nisational characters of the species are added.
RESUMEN
Se presentan nuevas citas de Caudofoveata procedentes de las costas de Barcelona y
Galicia: Chaetodermaf?) strigisquamatum transferido en Falcidens y F. vasconiensis, asi
como otras dos especies de Falcidens y dos de Prochaetoderma s.l. Se amplia el conoci-
miento de su distribución geográfica y se añaden algunos caracteres en la organización
de las especies.
INTRODUCTION
Caudofoveata are worm-shaped mol-
luscs of generally 2-30 mm but up to 40
cm in length that burrow in marine sedi-
ments in depths of 50-9000 m, under
special conditions as shallow as 3 m. They
are externally characterised by an apla-
cophoran mantle with chitinous cuticle as
well as unicellularly produced aragonitic
sclerites; together with the Solenogastres,
both clades reflect conservative levels of
molluscan configuration (Salvini-Plawen,
2003, 2006). Currently, 125 species of
Caudofoveata are described. Our knowl-
edge of the diversity and distribution of
the species in Iberian waters is still poor
(cf. Salvini-Plawen, 1997). Apart from
five taxa belonging to the bathial deep sea
fauna of the eastern Atlantic, the known
representatives of the Iberian shelf región
inelude nine Caudofoveata species (cf.
Salvini-Plawen, 1997; Scheltema and
Ivanov, 2000). Material from more recent
samplings revealed an enlargement of the
geographical distribution of six species
belonging to the Chaetodermatidae and
Prochaetodermatidae.
MATERIAL EXAMINED
Caudofoveata were present in several
samples from off Barcelona collected
during the BIOMARE project (CTM2006-
13508-C02-02) from the continental slope
and canyon at 41° 03" - 41° 15" N, 02° 04"-
02° 28" E, 550-850 m (see Table I). This mate-
rial was provided by Joan Cartes and
Valeria Mamouridis from the Instituí de
Ciéncies del Mar (CMIMA-CSIC) in
Barcelona.
*Zentrum für organismische Systembiologie: Zoologie, Universitát Wien, AlthanstraEe 14, A- 1090 WIEN,
Austria; Luitfried.Salvini-Plawen@univie.ac.at
107
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Table I. BIOMARE project and DIVA-Artabia sampling stations.
Tabla I. Estaciones de muestreo de los proyectos BIOMARE y DIVA-Artabria.
Samples with Caudofoveata were also
available from the DIVA-Artabria projects
(PGIDT01PXI20008PE; CTM-2004-00740 /
MAR; PGIDT07PXIB000120PR) organised
by Victoriano Urgorri (University of San-
tiago de Compostela) and conducted off
NW-Galicia in the Gulf of Ártabro outside
the Ria de Ferrol between 43° 28" N, 08°
28" W and 45° 43" N, 09° 00" W, at 100-1000
RESULTS
m depth; the samples were taken in Sep-
tember 2002, September 2003 and July
2006 using an epibenthic sledge (EBS)
(Table I).
The holotype of Chaetoderma(? )
strigisquamatum Salvini-Plawen (Muséum
National d"Histoire Naturelle Paris no.
21094) has been re-examined with respect
to the mantle sclerites.
Family Chaetodermatidae
Falcidens strigisquamatus (Salvini-Plawen, 1977)
Chaetoderma(?) strigisquamatum Salvini-Plawen, 1977. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Paris 3e sér. (447),
Zool 310: 419
[Type locality: Western Mediterranian Sea, Alborán Basin; 1491 m]
This species was known based on a
single specimen from the Sea of Alborán
and tentatively described under the
genus Chaetoderma(?) (Salvini-Plawen,
1977a). The investigations from off
Barcelona yielded five additional indi-
viduáis at 550-800 m (a voucher speci-
men is deposited in the Museo Nacional
108
Salvini-PlaweN: Geographical notes on Iberian Caudofoveata (Mollusca)
2 3 4
Figures 1-4. Falcidens strigisquamatus. 1: mantle sclerites, a-b from the foregut región, c-e from the
midgut región, f-h from the región of the midgut sac, h from the prepallial región, i-j from the
pallial región, k from alongside the dorsoterminal sense organ; 2: mantle sclerite (60 x 20 pm)
from the anterior foregut región of the holotype (see Figure la); 3: mantle sclerites from the ante-
rior foregut región of specimen BIOM 3, BC 4; sclerite at left = 60 x 19 pm (see Figure la); 4:
name-giving mantle scales from the regions of the midgut and midgut sac of specimen BIOM 3,
BC 4 (see Figure le-g).
Figuras 1-4. Falcidens strigisquamatus. 1: escleritos del manto, a-b de la región anterior del tubo digestivo,
c-e de la región media del tubo digestivo, f-h de la región del saco digestivo, h de la región prepaleal, i-j de la
región p aleal, k de la zona del órgano sensorial dorsoterminal; 2: escleritos del manto (60 x 20 pm) de la
región anterior del tubo digestivo del holotipo ( ver Figura la); 3: escleritos del manto de la región anterior
del tubo digestivo del espécimen BIOM 3, BC 4, esclerito de la izquierda 60 x 19 pm ( ver Figura la); 4:
escamas del manto, mostrando el dibujo que da nombre a la especie, de las regiones media del tubo digestivo
y del saco digestivo, del espécimen BIOM 3, BC 4 ( ver Figura le-g).
de Ciencias Naturales MNCN, Madrid,
no. 15.01/0005): BIOM 1, BC 10 (1 ind., 8
mm); BIOM 2, BC 7 (1 ind., broken, ante-
riormost body región missing, 8.5 mm);
BIOM 3, BC 14 (1 ind., 22 mm); BIOM 3,
BC 18 (1 ind., 19 mm) (voucher specimen
in MNCN); BIOM 8, BC 6 (1 ind., ante-
riormost body región missing, 15.5 mm)
Beyond the biogeographical data,
some organisational features are added
109
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
here to supplement the original descrip-
tion (holotype re-examined in Sept.
2008): (1) The species reaches a body
length of 22 mm and occasionally the
posteriormost región (of the pallial
cavity) shows some orange incrustation.
(2) The sclerites of the mantle cover (Fig.
1) at the middle and posterior body
(región of midgut sac, "posterior
trunk") are 140-350 ¡um long and of the
special type to which the ñame is allud-
ing. These elongate scales have longitu-
dinal ridges and furrows of different
number and length (Salvini-Plawen,
1977a; Figs 1 f-h and 4) and sometimes
are slightly asymmetrical. The scales of
the midgut región ("anterior trunk"; Fig.
1 c-e) are almost radially arranged. The
sclerites of the anterior body (foregut
región, "neck") show some variation
correlated to the size (age) of the speci-
mens: Large individuáis possess a cha-
racteristic type of small, slender scales
ranging from 30 x 12 ¡um to 70 x 25 ¡um
and 75 x 18 ¡um (Figs 1 a, 2, 3), which in
smaller animáis of up to 9 mm in length
(re-examined holotype and other) are
only sporadically present. In contrast,
smaller specimens possess in the ante-
rior body región roughly triangular
scales (Fig. 1 b), which are scarce in
large animáis. (3) The pedal shield
(about 300 x 200 ¡um) is preorally fused
by a not very prominent narrow portion
(Fig. 6). (3) The frontally bilobed cere-
bral ganglion has a distinct lobus impar.
(4) The radula, scarcely visible in trans-
parent whole mounts (see holotype), is
represented by a pair of sickle-shaped
teeth as is characteristic for the genus
Falcidens (Salvini-Plawen 1968); the
teeth are about 45 ¡um long and no sym-
physis could be discerned. In the largest
specimen, the whole apparatus (Fig. 5)
showed an un-reinforced basal cone
only 105 ¡um long (50 ¡um wide, 20 ¡um
thick), the two short lateral supports (55
¡um long, 50 ¡um wide) and small muscu-
lar radula bolsters ("odontophores"; 80
x 0 50 ¡um).
Falcidens vasconiensis Salvini-Plawen, 1996
Falcidens vasconiensis Salvini-Plawen, 1996. Bull. Soc. Zool. France 121: 341.
[Type locality: East Atlantic, SE Bay of Biscay, Cap Bretón; 141-170 m]
The species had been described from
the southeastern-most región of the Bay
of Biscaya (Salvini-Plawen, 1996, 1999).
The new records with three individuáis
at 250 m (4.5 mm), 300 m (5.5 mm) and
400 m (3 mm) evidence the presence of
the species also off NW-Galicia.
The mantle sclerites of the present
specimens show some individual varia-
tion but are typical for F. vasconiensis
(Fig. 3 in Salvini-Plawen, 1999). The
radula apparatus of the smallest speci-
men (3 mm) with two pairs of lateral
supports confirms the conspecificity (cf.
Fig. 4 in Salvini-Plawen, 1999); only
the pair of sickle-shaped teeth (pincers;
45 jum long) and the distal portion of the
basal cone are reinforced. The pedal
shield (about 150 x 135 ¡um) laterally
Banks the mouth opening (Fig. 6).
Family Prochaetodermaidae
Prochaetoderma boucheti Scheltema and Ivanov, 2000
Prochaetoderma boucheti Scheltema and Ivanov, 2000. Journ. Molí. Stud. 66: 336
[Type locality: Western Mediterranean Sea, off Ceuta (Morocco); 425 m]
This species had been partly con- differs by two rows of pedal shield
fused with the sympatric P. iberogallicum scales and by the (likewise short, up to
Salvini-Plawen, 1999, from which it 135 ¡um) elongate midbody sclerites pro-
110
Salvini-Plawen: Geographical notes on Iberian Caudofoveata (Mollusca)
Figure 5. Falcidens strigisquamatus , hard parts of the radula apparatus; basal cone outlined in
natural position and when turned into the plañe (dashed line). Figure 6. Pedal shields of Falcidens
strigisquamatus (aboye) and Falcidens vasconiensis (below).
Figura 5. Falcidens strigisquamatus, partes duras del aparato radular; barra basal dibujada en su posi-
ción natural y doblada sobre el plano ( línea discontinua). Figura 6. Escudos pedios de Falcidens
strigisquamatus (arriba) y Falcidens vasconiensis (abajo).
vided with a distal median keel (Schel-
tema and Ivanov, 2001). In some
regions it is also sympatric with P. allerii
(below): Apart from the published
Iberian distribution of P. boucheti from
the Southern Bay of Biscay, the Gulf of
Cádiz, from off Ceuta and from off
Málaga (Scheltema and Ivanov, 2000,
2001), additional findings can be
reported.
There are several records of P.
boucheti from Galicia outside the Ria de
Ferrol at 150-400 m, predominantly at
150 m. In addition, a single specimen
was found off Barcelona with BIOM 4,
BC 3 (650 m).
Prochaetoderma alleni (Scheltema and Ivanov, 2000)
Spathoderma alleni Scheltema and Ivanov, 2000. Journ. Molí. Stud. 66: 358
[Type locality: East Atlantic, Bay of Biscay; 860 m]
The species is known from Iceland to
the Mediterranean (Ivanov and Schel-
tema, 2001) and in some regions it is sym-
patric with P. boucheti (above); its eastern-
most record comes from the Aegean Sea
cióse to Limnos (emendation of Salvini-
Plawen, 1977a: Stat. DS-08/ 14). It is cha-
racterised by three rows of pedal shield
scales and by the somewhat longitudinally
rotated and asymmetrical midbody scle-
rites (up to 250 jum).
The known Iberian distribution
refers to the Southern Bay of Biscay, to
off central Portugal, to the Gulf of Cádiz
and to off Morocco (off Ceuta to off
Melilla; cf. Scheltema and Ivanov,
2000). There are four new records from
off Barcelona: BIOM 1, BC 8; BIOM 3,
BC 8 (4 mm long with up to 300 |Um long
scales); BIOM 4, BC 3; BIOM 4, BC 4.
Biogeographically, these findings
border the occurrence of P. alleni from
off Banyuls-sur-Mer/Cóte Vermeille
(Mediterranean coast of France: Salvini-
Plawen, 1977b; Scheltema and Ivanov,
2000).
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Additional species
The presence of other Caudofoveata gutturosus (Kowalevsky, 1901) from BIOM
species from off Barcelona has already been 2, BC 11 and BIOM 3, BC 3, as well as of
communicated (Salvini-Plawen, 1997). Falcidens aequabilis Salvini-Plawen, 1972,
There are additional records of Falcidens from BIOM 3, BC 3 and BIOM 4, BC 4.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is very grateful to
Mag. Emanuel Redi (Vienna) for
assistance in preparing the photo-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
IVANOV D.L. AND SCHELTEMA A.H. 2001. DÍS-
tribution of known caudofoveate species
(Mollusca, Aplacophora) around Iceland.
Ruthenica 11: 1-6.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1968. Über Lebend-
beobachtungen an Caudofoveata (Mollusca,
Aculifera), nebst Bemerkungen zum System
der Klasse. Sarsia 31: 105-126.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1977a. Caudofoveata
(Mollusca) des Forschungsprojektes
Polyméde. Bulletin du Museum national d 'His-
toire naturelle, 3e sér. (447), Zoologie 310: 413-
421.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1977b. Caudofoveata
(Mollusca), Priapulida und Apode Ho-
lothurien ( Labidoplax , Myriotrochus) bei
Banyuls und im Mittelmeer allgemein. Vie et
Milieu, 27 (A/ 1): 55-81.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1996. Falcidens vasconien-
s is spec. nov. (Mollusca, Caudofoveata) du
plateau continental du Golfe de Gascogne.
Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 121 :
339-345.
graphs and to Dr. Michael Stacho-
witsch (Vienna) for polishing the
English text.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1997. Fragmented know-
ledge on West-European and Iberian Caudo-
foveata and Solenogastres. Iberus, 15 : 35-50.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 1999. Caudofoveata (Mo-
llusca) from off the northern coast of the Ibe-
rian Peninsula. Iberus, 17 (2): 77-84.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 2003. On the phyloge-
netic significance of the aplacophoran Mol-
lusca. Iberus 21 (1): 67-97.
Salvini-Plawen L.v. 2006. The significance of
the Placophora for molluscan Phylogeny.
Venus 65: 1-17.
SCHELTEMA A.H. AND IVANOV D.L. 2000.
Prochaetodermatidae of the eastern Atlantic
Ocean and Mediterranean Sea (Mollusca:
Aplacophora). Journal of Molluscan Studies,
66: 313-362.
SCHELTEMA A.H. AND IVANOV D.L. 2001. East-
ern Atlantic Prochaetodermatidae revisited:
the nonsynonymy of Prochaetoderma boucheti
Scheltema and Ivanov (Aplacophora). Jour-
nal of Molluscan Studies, 67: 396-398.
112
© Sociedad Española de Malacología
Iberus, 27 (2): 113-154, 2009
Las especies de Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884 (Mollusca,
Neogastropoda) de Canarias y el área oeste africana de
Mauritania y Sahara
The species of Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884 (Mollusca,
Neogastropoda) from the Canary islands and the Western African
area of Mauritania and the Sahara
Joan Daniel OLIVER* y Emilio ROLÁN**
Recibido el 10-VIII-2009. Aceptado el 5-X-2009
RESUMEN
Se revisan las especies del género Chauvetia Monterosato, 1 884 encontradas en el área
comprendida entre el archipiélago canario y la costa oesteafricana de Mauritania y
Sahara. Se estudian 1 8 especies de las que 9 son descritas como nuevas.
ABSTRACT
The species of the genus Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884 found in the area including the
Canaries archipelago and the African coast of Mauritania and the Sahara are revised. 1 8
species are studied of which 9 are described as new species.
INTRODUCCIÓN
El género Chauvetia Monterosato,
1884 se encuentra extendido desde el
Mediterráneo, el Atlántico europeo,
Canarias y la costa oeste africana desde
Marruecos hasta Ghana. Se conocen
algunas especies de este género desde
hace muchos años y las descripciones de
muchos taxones ha hecho que, unido a
la variabilidad intraespecífica, el grupo
tenga grandes dificultades para una
completa y correcta ordenación y pre-
sente bastantes taxones, muchos de ellos
sinónimos.
Se debe mencionar aquí que la varia-
bilidad morfológica y cromática puede
ser muy importante en el género Chauve-
tia, y por ello no se puede hacer una sepa-
ración simplista basada en unos pocos
caracteres. Como ejemplo sirva mencio-
nar que una concha de color castaño
oscuro puede pertenecer a alguna de
estas especies: Chauvetia brunnea, C.
affinis, C. turritellata, C. crassior, C. tene-
brosa y C. mamillata, entre otras. Por otro
lado, la misma especie, como por ej.,
Chauvetia crassior, puede ser blanca, ama-
rilla, castaña clara, castaña muy oscura,
con bandas castañas y blancas, etc.
Sabelli, Giannuzzi-Savelli y Bedulli
(1991) citan para el Mediterráneo 15 espe-
cies de Chauvetia que fueron descritas en
8 géneros diferentes y con unos 26 sinó-
nimos, aún sin estar todos ellos exhausti-
vamente referidos.
* Alcorisa, 83-12C, E-28043 Madrid
** Museo de Historia Natural, Campus Universitario Sur, E-17582, Santiago de Compostela
113
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Nordsieck (1976) hace una revisión
sobre este grupo, pero estamos de
acuerdo con Micali (1999) en que este
trabajo está lastrado por una gran canti-
dad de errores y erratas interpretativas.
Nordsieck y García-Talavera
(1979) incluyen en su trabajo las espe-
cies de Canarias describiendo nuevos
taxones. Micali (1999) hizo una revisión
de las especies de este género, pero prin-
cipalmente de aquellas del Mediterrá-
neo occidental y el Atlántico próximo.
Oliver y Rolán (2008) estudiaron las
especies del área de Dakar.
Está en marcha un nuevo estudio del
conjunto de las existentes en el Medite-
rráneo, estrecho y Atlántico próximo y,
en ese trabajo, se tratará de volver a
revisar todo el género con las nuevas
aportaciones existentes, especialmente
con el estudio de nuevo material y la
observación de protoconcha y escultura
al microscopio electrónico de barrido.
Mientras tanto, la reunión de una
gran cantidad de ejemplares y conchas
del área de estudio y próximas proce-
dente de las colecciones de José Pedro
Borges de Lisboa, José María Hernán-
dez de Canarias, Peter Ryall de Maria
Rain, Austria, Frank Swinnen de
Lommel, Bélgica, y del Museo Nacional
de Historia Natural de Paris, hizo
posible la revisión del género por
encima del área de Dakar que ya habían
sido estudiada en un trabajo anterior
(Oliver y Rolán, 2008). En el presente
trabajo, el área de estudio, como se ha
indicado, comprende la costa africana
de Mauritania y Sahara Occidental, así
como el archipiélago de Canarias
próximo a estas costas.
Abreviaturas
MNCN Museo Nacional de Ciencias
Naturales, Madrid
MNHN Museo national d'Histoire natu-
relle, Paris
MNHC Museo de la Naturaleza y el
Hombre de Tenerife, Canarias
MHNS Museo de Historia Natural, San-
tiago de Compostela, (colección E.
Rolán)
CFS colección de Frank Swinnen,
Lommel,
CHO colección de José María Hernán-
dez Otero, Gáldar, Gran Canaria
CPB colección de José Pedro Borges,
Lisboa
CPR colección de Peter Ryall, Maria
Rain, Austria
ej ejemplar con partes blandas
c concha vacía
j juvenil
PARTE TAXONÓMICA
Familia Buccinidae
Género Chauvetia Monterosato, 1884
Chauvetia mamillata (Risso, 1826) (Figs. 1-5)
Nasaea mamillata Risso, 1826. Hist. Nat... Alpes-Marit., p. 223, lám. 5, fig. 69. [Localidad tipo: Alpes
maritimes, Francia].
Material tipo: Lectotipo en MNHN (Figs. 1-2) (6,
Material estudiado: CANARIAS: Gran Canaria:
che (CHO); 1 c. Playa Honda, Lanzarote (CHO); 5
de pesca (MHNS).
Comentarios : C. mamillata se diferen-
cia de C. affinis o de C. brunnea por su
mayor tamaño (algo más de 6 mm frente
a algo más de 5 mm). Además de C.
affinis se distingue por ser proporcional-
3 mm).
2 c (CPR); Lanzarote: 1 c, Ref: 322050401, Formi-
c. Puerto del Carmen (CFS). SAHARA: 1 c, barcos
mente más ancha y por tener un aspecto
más sólido. Esta especie es poco fre-
cuente en la zona y será tratada en el
trabajo referido a las especies mediterrá-
neas que está en marcha.
1 14
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 1-5. Chauvetia mamillata (Risso, 1826), 1-2: lectotipo, 6,3 mm (MNHN); 3: 6,6 mm,
Cerdeña; 4: 6,2 mm, Agaete, NO Gran Canaria (CPR); 5: 5,9 mm, Lanzarote. Figuras 6-13.
Chauvetia affinis (Monterosato, 1889): 6-9: 2 sintipos, 4,8, 4,5 mm, Ognina (MNHN, coll.
Locard); 10: forma affinis , 5,3 mm, Tarajalillo, Gran Canaria; 11: forma bandeada, 5,5 mm, Tene-
rife; 12, 13: forma oscura, 4,8, 5,2 mm, Granillo, Fuerteventura. Figuras 14-16. Chauvetia lefebvrii
(Maravigna, 1840), 14: 7,8 mm, Tarifa, Cádiz; 15-16: 6,2 mm, Sahara. Figuras 17, 18. Chauvetia
procerula (Monterosato, 1889); 17: 5,2, NO Gran Canaria; 18: 5,0 mm, Gran Canaria.
Figures 1-5. Chauvetia mamillata (Risso, 1826), 1-2: lectotype, 6.3 mm (MNHN); 3: 6.6 mm,
Cerdeña; 4: 6.2 mm, Agaete, NW Gran Canaria (CPR); 5: 5.9 mm, Lanzarote. Figures 6-13. Chau-
vetia affinis (Monterosato, 1889): 6-9: 2 syntypes, 4.8, 4.5 mm, Ognina (MNHN, coll. Locard); 10:
form affinis, 5.3 mm, Tarajalillo, Gran Canaria; 11: banded form, 5.5 mm, Tenerife; 12, 13: dark
form, 4.8, 5.2 mm, Granillo, Fuerteventura. Figures 14-16. Chauvetia lefebvrii (Maravigna, 1840),
14: 7.8 mm, Tarifa, Cádiz; 15-16: 6.2 mm, Sahara. Figures 17, 18. Chauvetia procerula (Montero-
sato, 1889); 17: 5.2, NW Gran Canaria; 18: 5.0 mm, Gran Canaria.
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
C. affinis (Monterosato,1889) (Figs. 6-13, 68-76)
Fusus turritellatus auct. non Deshayes, 1835. Exp. Se. de Morée: 174, lám. 19, figs. 43-45. [Localidad
tipo: Morée, hoy Peloponeso, Grecia].
Donovania affinis Monterosato, 1889. Journ. de Conch., 37: 116. [Localidad tipo: Casablanca,
Marruecos, Taormina, Sicilia y Pantellaria]
Material tipo: C. affinis : 2 posibles sintipos (MNHN, coll. Locard) (Figs. 6-9).
Otro material estudiado: CANARIAS: Gran Canaria: 1 c. La Isleta (CFS); 2 j, Maspalomas (CFS); 2
j, C0020a (CHO); 1 c. Caleta Abajo, lote 230, locC0014 (CHO); 1 j (CFS); 10 c, 4 j. Castillo del Romeral
(CFS); 6 c Playa de Gran Canaria (CFS); 1 c, 1 j. Sardina, 10 m, NO Gran Canaria, arena y rocas
(CHO); 12 c. Playa Honda (CFS); 7 c, 1 f. Playa del Hombre (CFS); 2 c, 1 j. Gando, 12 m, en Cymo-
docea (CHO): 11 c, C0014; 3 c, C0037 (CHO); 1 c, 1 j, Tarajalillo (CHO); 12 c, Tarajalillo (MNHN); 1
j, Tarajalillo (CFS); 1 j, Quintanilla, 20/07/93 (MNHN); 20 c, 20 j. Las Canteras (CFS); 1 c. Gando,
8,2483 (MNHN); 2 c. Las Canteras (CFS); 1 c, NO Gran Canaria (CFS); 1 c. Bañadores, 060384
(MNHN); 1 j, Roque, Taliarte, 28 m (MNHN); 10 c. Gando, Gran Canaria (CHO); 1 c, 2 j, Tarajali-
llo, 22-23 m (CPR); 2 ej, 5c, Sardina, 15 m (CHO); 7 c, C0022 (CHO); 10 c, Tarajalillo (CHO); 4 c, 1 j,
Quintanilla, en pozas (CHO); más de 200 ej y c, Arinaga, 15 m (CFS). Isla de la Palma: 3 c. Taza-
corte, 6 m (MNHN). Lanzarote: 8 c, 5 j, 1 j. Isla Graciosa (CFS); 2 j. La Sabina, 40 m (CFS); 2 c. Playa
Honda, Arrecife, (CHO); 1 j, Pecheguera (Lanzarote); 2 c, Pecheguera (MNHN); 1 c. Playa Honda
(CHO); 1 c, lj, Pto del Carmen, 40 m (CHO); 1 c. Playa Honda, intermareal. Arrecife (CHO); 1 c.
Bañadores, 060384 (CHO); 2 c. Granillo (CHO); 4 ej, 5 c, 2 j. Las Coloradas, intermareal (MNHN);
2 c, Pecheguera, intermareal (MNHN); 5c, Arrecife intermareal (MNHN); 10 c, 4 j. Puerto del Carmen,
34-45 m (CFS). Tenerife: 1 c. Los Cristianos (CFS); 1 ej, st08/ 04-03, Punta Teño, (CPB); 1 j, 03/ 10/07
Punta Teño (CPB); 1 ej, 11/05/ 06 Punta Teño (CPB); 1 c. Agua Dulce, 3-7 m (MNHN); 1 c. La Tejita,
intermareal (MNHN); 1 ej, 2 c, 1 j, Palm-Mar, (MNHN); 6 c, C0019; 4 c, C0010 (CHO); 1 c, C0014
(CHO); 4 c. La Tejita, intermareal (MNHN); 1 j, Palm-Mar, 6-8 m (MNHN); 1 c. Los Burros (CHO);
1 c, CFV065 (CHO); 2 c, C0014 (CHO); 1 c. Bañadores, 06/03/84 (CHO); 1 c, C0005 (CHO); 1 c,
C0009 (CHO); 1 c, 1 j, 1 f, FH67 (CHO); 1 c, lote 2419 (MHNS); 21 c, 7 j. Punta Teño, entre interma-
real y 3 m (CPB). Fuerteventura: 8 c, Ajui, (CHO); 1 c, 3 j, FH67 (CHO); 3 c, 7 j, RH033 (CHO); 2 c,
C0010 (CHO). SAHARA: 1 j, lote 207, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W (CHO); 1 c, 1 j, lote 208, 23° 08' N, 16° 25'
W (CHO); 1 c, lote 272, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 5 c, 249 (MHNS).
(Página derecha) Figuras 19-23. Chauvetia crassior (Odhner, 1932); 19, 20: holotipo, 5,3 mm
(SMNH); 21-23: 6,4, 6,6, 7,1 mm, Sardina, Gran Canaria; 24: Chauvetia cf. crassior (Odhner,
1932), 8,8 mm, Cabo Blanco, Mauritania (CFS). Figuras 25, 26. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956;
25, 26: 7,5, 6,2 mm, Sahara. Figuras 27-30. Chauvetia javieri Oliver y Rolán, 2008; 27-29: 7,3,
6,7, 8,3 mm, Barcos de Pesca, Sahara; 30: paratipo, 7,6 mm, Dakar, Senegal (MNHN). Figura 31.
Chauvetia jo ani Oliver y Rolán, 2008, paratipo, 6,9 mm, Dakar, Senegal (MHNS). Figura 32.
Chauvetia tenebrosa Oliver y Rolán, 2008, 4,6 mm, Baie de FEtoile, Nouahdibou, Mauritania.
Figuras 33-35. Chauvetia errata spec. nov.; 33-34: holotipo, 7,0 mm, Cape Rouge, Misión Gruvel
(MNHN); 35: 5,7 mm, Dakar, Senegal. Figuras 36. Chauvetia megastoma spec. nov. holotipo, 7,2
mm, Mauritania (MNCN).
(Right page) Figures 19-23. Chauvetia crassior (Odhner, 1932); 19, 20: holotype, 5.3 mm (SMNH);
21-23: 6.4, 6.6, 7.1 mm. Sardina, Gran Canaria; 24: Chauvetia cf. crassior (Odhner, 1932), 8.8
mm, Cap Blanc, Mauritania (CFS). Figures 25, 26. Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956; 25, 26: 7.5,
6.2 mm, Sahara. Figures 27-30. Chauvetia javieri Oliver y Rolán, 2008; 27-29: 7.3, 6.7, 8.3 mm,
Fishing ships, Sahara; 30: paratype, 7.6 mm, Dakar, Senegal (MNHN). Figure 31. Chauvetia joani
Oliver y Rolán, 2008, paratype, 6.9 mm, Dakar, Senegal (MHNS). Figure 32. Chauvetia tenebrosa
Oliver y Rolán, 2008, 4.6 mm, Baie de l’Étoile, Nouahdibou, Mauritania. Figures 33-35. Chauvetia
errata spec. nov.; 33-34: holotype, 7.0 mm, Cap Rouge, Misión Gruvel (MNHN); 35: 5.7 mm, Dakar,
Senegal. Figures 36. Chauvetia megastoma spec. nov. holotype, 7.2 mm, Mauritania (MNCN).
lió
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
117
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figuras 37-39. Chauvetia gigantísima spec. nov., 37; paratipo, 19,7 mm (MNCN); 38: holotipo,
14.2 mm (MNHN); 39: protoconcha. Figuras 40-44. Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov. 40, 41:
holotipo, 8,6 mm, 22° 35’ N, 16° 58’ W (MNCN); 42: paratipo, 11,0 mm (MNHN); 43, 44:
paratipo, 7,8 mm, (MHNS). Figuras 45-48. Chauvetia distans spec. nov. 45-46: holotipo, 6,8 mm,
23° 05’ N, 16° 35’ W, 37 m (MNCN); 47: 6,9 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16° 00’ W, Sahara (MNHN); 48:
paratipo, 6,0 mm, 23° 05’ N, 17° 05’ W, 80 m (BMNH). Figuras 49-52. Chauvetia austera spec.
nov. 49, 50: holotipo 8,4 mm (MNCN); 51: 7,8 mm, Sahara (MNHN); 52: protoconcha.
Figures 37-39. Chauvetia gigantissima spec. nov., 37; par atype, 19.7 mm (MNCN); 38: holotype,
14.2 mm (MNHN); 39: protoconch. Figures 40-44. Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov. 40, 41:
holotype, 8.6 mm, 22 0 35’ N, 16° 58’ W (MNCN); 42: paratype, 11.0 mm (MNHN); 43, 44:
paratype, 7.8 mm, (MHNS). Figures 45-48. Chauvetia distans spec. nov. 45-46: holotype, 6.8 mm,
23° 05’ N, 16° 35’ W 37 m (MNCN); 47: 6.9 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16 0 00’ W, Sahara (MNHN); 48:
paratype, 6.0 mm, 23° 05’ N, 17 0 05’W,80m (BMNH). Figures 49-52. Chauvetia austera spec. nov.
49, 50: holotype 8.4 mm (MNCN); 51: 7.8 mm, Sahara (MNHN); 52: protoconch.
118
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 53, 54. Chauvetia peculiaris spec. nov., holotipo, 7,7 mm, Sahara, 22° 00’ N, 17° 22’ W,
46 m (MNCN). Figuras 55-59. Chauvetia edentula, spec. nov.; 55-57: holotipo, 6,3 mm, Sahara
(MNCN); 58, 59: paratipos, 5,7, 5,5 mm, Arguineguín, 377 m (CHO). Figuras 60-65. Chauvetia
borgesi spec. nov.; 60, 61: holotipo, 7,0 mm, Gando (MNCN); 62, 63: paratipo, 6,2 mm, Gando
(MNHN); 64: concha, 7,4 mm, Sahara, 22° 05’ N, 16° 58’ W; 65: concha, 6,5 mm, Sahara, 22°
05’ N, 16° 58’ W. Figura 66. Chauvetia candidissima canarica Nordsieck y García-Talavera, 1979,
lectotipo, 5,5 mm, La Gomera (MNHC). Figura 67. Chauvetia elongata Nordsieck y García-Tala-
vera, 1979, holotipo, 8,8 mm, S de Gran Canaria (MNHC).
Figures 53, 54. Chauvetia peculiaris spec. nov., holotype, 7.7 mm, Sahara, 22 0 00’ N, 17° 22’ W, 46
m (MNCN). Figures 55-59. Chauvetia edentula, spec. nov.; 55-57: holotype, 6.3 mm, Sahara
(MNCN); 58, 59: paratypes, 5.7, 5.5 mm, Arguineguín, 377 m (CHO). Figures 60-65. Chauvetia
borgesi spec. nov.; 60, 61: holotype, 7.0 mm, Gando (MNCN); 62, 63: par atype, 6.2 mm, Gando
(MNHN); 64: shell, 7.4 mm, Sahara, 22 0 05’ N, 16° 58’ W; 65: shell, 6.5 mm, Sahara, 22° 05’ N,
16° 58’ W. Figure 66. Chauvetia candidissima canarica Nordsieck and García-Talavera, 1979, lec-
totype, 5.5 mm, La Gomera (MNHC). Figure 67. Chauvetia elongata Nordsieck and García-Tala-
vera, 1979, holotype, 8.8 mm, S of Gran Canaria (MNHC).
1 19
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 6-13, 68-
72) fusiforme, alargada con unas 6
vueltas, sólida y con sutura marcada.
Protoconcha (Figs. 73-76) con 0,8
vueltas y unos 500 jum de anchura, orna-
mentada por una veintena de cordones
planos, de anchura parecida, y separa-
dos por interespacios de anchura similar
en los que se aprecia las típicas incisio-
nes de las Chauvetia. Al final de la
misma aparecen cuatro o cinco costillas
bastante verticales, relativamente juntas
y curvadas en su parte superior donde
hay una estrecha repisa.
Teleoconcha con escultura formada
por cordones espirales y costillas axiales
algo prosoclinas; ambos tienen una
anchura similar o algo superior a sus
interespacios. Primera vuelta con tres
cordones espirales y el cuarto aparece
enseguida, al principio como el reborde
superior de la vuelta para luego sepa-
rarse de la sutura. Última vuelta con
cinco cordones por encima de la inser-
ción bucal, siendo los dos superiores
claramente más estrechos que el resto.
El cordón superior no en todas las
conchas se puede apreciar claramente
siendo a veces un simple reborde poco
perceptible. Por debajo de la inserción
labial hay una decena más de cordonci-
llos que van estrechándose y aproxi-
mándose a medida que nos acercamos a
la base.
Abertura con un 30% de la altura
total, oval y, en el interior del labio
externo, hay seis pliegues dentales de
los que el más inferior marcaría el inicio
del canal sifonal. Canal sifonal corto y
poco claro ya que apenas se aprecia una
incisión en la base del labio externo
como sucede en otras especies.
Coloración: Aunque C. affinis pre-
senta cierta variabilidad respecto a la
forma de la concha y su escultura
(puede haber conchas proporcional-
mente más anchas o más alargadas, o
con sus cordones más o menos anchos)
las diferencias fundamentales se basan
en su color. En el área de estudio hemos
distinguido tres formas atendiendo a los
patrones de color además de unas pocas
conchas que se podrían considerar como
formas intermedias.
Forma affinis, concha de color
castaño rojizo con los tubérculos más
amarillentos y redondeados.
Forma bandeada, concha blanco
amarillenta con una banda marrón
oscura subsutural y otra basal
Forma oscura, concha de color
marrón rojizo homogénea más o menos
oscura.
Dimensiones: hasta 5,8 mm de altura
y 2,2 mm de anchura.
Distribución : Esta especie se encuen-
tra abundantemente en Canarias, en
todas sus islas. También se ha encon-
trado en Sahara y en el Mediterráneo.
Comentarios : La base de datos
CLEMAM (en Julio 2009, cuando se
remite este trabajo) considera como
especies válidas Chauvetia brunnea
(Donovan, 1804), C. affinis (Montero-
sato,1889), C. decorata Monterosato,1889
y C. mamillata (Risso, 1826) mientras que
C. turritellata (Deshayes, 1835, Fusus ) es
considerado como un taxón dudoso que
necesita una revisión.
Sin embargo, Micali (1999) considera
como especies válidas C. brunnea, C. turri-
tellata y C. mamillata mientras que los
taxones Donovania affinis Monterosato,
1889 y Chauvetia decorata Monterosato,
1889 son considerados variedades de C.
turritellata y por lo tanto sinónimos.
Según Micali (1999), C. mamillata se
diferencia de las otras dos por su mayor
tamaño (7 mm frente a 5 mm de C. turri-
tellata y C. brunnea ), entre otras caracterís-
ticas. Por su parte, C. turritellata se distin-
guiría de C. brunnea por tener una forma
más ahusada, un mayor número de costi-
llas axiales (de diez a quince en la última
vuelta frente a diez en C. brunnea), denti-
culación en el labio interno menos acen-
tuada, escultura menos relevante y costi-
llas más sutiles. En este estudio conside-
ramos C. affinis el nombre válido y no uti-
lizamos el nombre de C. turritellata por
tener esta su localidad tipo en el Medite-
rráneo oriental. Se ha intentado localizar
el material tipo de Fusus turritellatus Des-
hayes, 1835 pero no se ha encontrado en
el MNHN, y tampoco en la Ecole de
Mines de Paris (Virginie Heros, pers.
com.); tampoco está en BMNH (Amelia
MacLellan, pers. com.). Siendo estas las
120
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 68-76. Chauvetia affinis (Monterosato, 1889): 68, 70, 73, 76: 3,1, 4,8 mm, forma affinis y
protoconchas, Tarajalillo, Gran Canaria; 69, 74: 3,2 mm, forma oscura, Las Burras, Gran Canaria;
71: 5,8 mm, forma bandeada, Tenerife; 72, 75: 4,0 mm, Orzóla, Lanzarote.
Figures 68-76. Chauvetia affinis (Monterosato, 1889): 68, 70, 73, 76: 5.1, 4.8 mm, form affinis, and
protoconchs, Tarajalillo, Gran Canaria; 69, 74: 5.2 mm, dark form , Las Burras, Gran Canaria; 71:
5.8 mm, banded form , Tenerife; 72, 75: 4.0 mm, Orzóla, Lanzarote.
121
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
instituciones que, según Dance (1986),
podrían contener el material de Desha-
yes, se puede considerar perdido. A
efectos taxonómicos, pensamos que este
taxon no debe estar representado en el
área de estudio dado su origen en el
Mediterráneo oriental y su ausencia en el
estrecho de Gibraltar, sur de España y
norte de Marruecos. Por otra parte
también discrepamos con Micali en con-
siderar C. decorata como sinónima de C.
turritellata. Creeemos que C. decorata es
una especie con entidad propia que se
abordará en trabajos posteriores.
Los cuatro taxones reseñados ante-
riormente junto con C. tenebrosa Oliver y
Rolán, 2008, una especie de Senegal, per-
tenecen a un grupo de Chauvetia muy pa-
recidas y sin duda emparentadas filoge-
néticamente. Determinar qué especies
son válidas y qué son variedades o
dónde empieza una especie y dónde
acaba otra es complicado y, en todo caso,
un estudio fundamentalmente conquio-
lógico no puede resolver definitivamente
el problema. La dificultad se ve acrecen-
tada por la amplia distribución de estas
especies que, por otra parte, presentan
una protoconcha paucispiral, posible-
mente con desarrollo lecitotrófico y con
posibilidades de dispersión limitada, lo
que favorecería la especiación, funda-
mentalmente en ambientes insulares.
Algo de esto se ha podido comprobar en
conchas del Banco Gorringe y de Lanza-
rote que se estudiarán y se mencionarán
en un próximo trabajo.
Respecto a las diferencias en la colo-
ración de las partes blandas, Mifsud
(1994) indica que C. turritellata presenta
un pie blanco opaco con la cabeza, los
tentáculos y el sifón negro grisáceo. Para
apoyarlo aporta fotos de ejemplares ita-
lianos (Acitrezza). Esto contrastaría con
la descripción del animal de C. brunnea
dado por Fretter y Graham (1984) que
indican que el animal sería de color
crema con puntos opacos blancos. Por su
parte, C. mamillata es de color negro azu-
lado (Hergueta, Luque y Templado
2002 y observación personal). El animal
de C. affinis es de color grisáceo con el
pie de color blanco. Este color se pre-
senta tanto en la forma bandeada como
en la forma típica affinis (Figs. 162 y 163).
En el caso de C. turritellata del Mediterrá-
neo, el color grisáceo del cuerpo del ani-
mal se da en forma de manchas irregula-
res (Micali, 1999: figs. 24-26) y no de
forma continua como es el caso de C. affi-
nis. En el presente trabajo se ilustra (Figs
160-161) también un animal de color
claro, casi traslúcido, con alguna mancha
opaca de color blanco leche cuya concha
seguiría el patrón affinis. Dado el redu-
cido número de animales estudiados no
podemos asegurar si existe variabilidad
en el color del animal o por el contrario
si nos encontramos ante dos especies
crípticas. Por ello se ha optado por consi-
derar a esta última como C. cf. affinis.
El estudio y comparación de estos
taxones con otras especies mediterrá-
neas, del Atlántico europeo y del área
del Estrecho, se hará en la revisión de
las especies mediterráneas y atlánticas
europeas que actualmente se está reali-
zando.
Chauvetia lefebvrii (Maravigna,1840) (Figs. 14-16, 77-80)
Fussus granulatus Calcara, 1839 non Nassaea granulata Risso, 1826.
Buccinum lefebvrii Maravigna, 1840.
Buccinum folinae sensu Philippi, 1844 non Delle Chiaje, 1828.
Lachesis areolata Tiberi, 1868.
Murex folineae sensu Philippi, 1844 non Delle Chiaje, 1828.
¿Chauvetia obliqua Nordsiek y Talavera, 1979: 141.
Chauvetia pellisphocae sensu Nordsieck, 1976 non Reeve, 1845.
Material tipo: Desconocido.
Material estudiado: SAHARA: 1 j, 23° 10' N, 16° 28' W, (CHO); 2 c, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, 58 m (CHO);
1 c, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, (CHO); 13 ej, lote 304 (CHO); 10 ej, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W, 40 m, (CHO); 1 ej, Cabo
Barbas, 58 m (CHO); 2 c, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W (CFS); 6 c. Barcos de Pesca (MHNS); 2 c, 50-60 m (CPR).
122
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 77-80. Chauvetia lefebvrii (Maravigna, 1840); 77: concha, 8,4 mm, Sahara Occidental; 78,
79: protoconcha, Sahara Occidental; 80: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 77-80. Chauvetia lefebvrii (Maravigna, 1840); 77: shell, 8.4 mm, West Sahara; 78, 79: pro-
toconch, West Sahara; 80: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
123
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 14-16)
fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira, sutura poco marcada.
Protoconcha (Figs. 78, 79) con 0,8
vueltas, y una anchura de unas 850 jum
(núcleo: 500 jum, primera media vuelta:
680 jUm) y unas 700 jum de altura. Escul-
tura espiral (Fig. 80) poco marcada (muy
difícil de apreciar en ejemplares algo
rodados) formada por unos treinta o cua-
renta cordones separados por interespa-
cios de anchura similar y en los que se
aprecian las incisiones típicas de las Chau-
vetia. A partir de la primera media vuelta
de la protoconcha aparecen una decena
de costillas separadas por espacios en los
que se ven los cordones espirales. La parte
superior de las costillas está curvada y
forma, en la parte superior de la proto-
concha, un estrecho canal. El final de la
protoconcha es poco claro por lo que se
ha considerado como tal el momento en
que van apareciendo los cordones espira-
les de la teleoconcha.
Teleoconcha con vueltas de perfil pla-
noconvexo y sutura poco profunda. Escul-
tura formada por cordones espirales, con
anchura similar a sus interespacios, lo que
ocurre también en las costillas. Ambos son
en general poco relevantes siendo más evi-
dentes en las primeras vueltas. En el inicio
de la teleoconcha aparecen tres cordones
espirales, formando el superior el reborde
de la espira. En la tercera vuelta aparece
por encima un cuarto cordón en principio
más estrecho que los inferiores. En la
penúltima vuelta puede observarse oca-
sionalmente un quinto cordón inferior
prácticamente oculto por la sutura. En la
última vuelta, por encima de la inserción
labial, hay cuatro cordones planos, por lo
general más anchos que sus interespacios.
En la base hay aproximadamente una
decena más de cordones que se van jun-
tando en el canal sifonal. En la última
vuelta apenas se perciben las costillas (unas
veinte, algo prosoclinas) que llegan hasta
la base de la concha acabando cerca del
inicio del canal sifonal.
Abertura oval ocupa cerca del 27 %
de la altura total. Labio externo varicoso
con 4 dientes en su parte interna. Canal
sifonal poco desarrollado.
Coloración de la concha: los cordones
espirales son marrón rojizo sobre un fondo
blanco amarillento. Dependiendo de la
anchura de los cordones la concha resulta
más o menos oscura. En algunos ejem-
plares se ha podido observar la típica colo-
ración "nodulada", aunque débil y sobre
todo en las vueltas iniciales. Esta colora-
ción, típica de las conchas mediterráneas,
se debe a que los cordones son más claros,
incluso amarillentos, en los espacios inter-
costales. El interior de la concha es blanco.
Dimensiones: hasta una altura má-
xima de unos 9 mm.
Animal: desconocido.
Distribución: La especie se halla pre-
sente desde el Mediterráneo y costa
occidental de la Península Ibérica, hasta
el Sahara, pero no se ha encontrado en
Canarias.
Comentarios: Las conchas del Sahara
tienen un patrón de color lineado y
parecen ser la forma más meridional de
una especie algo variable. La forma
mediterránea es más pupoide y de
aspecto noduloso. En el área del Estrecho
de Gibraltar se presentan tanto formas
lineadas como nodulosas. El aspecto de
la protoconcha y de las primeras vueltas
es similar en todas, lo que parece indicar
que se trata de una única especie.
Chauvetia procerula (Monterosato 1889) (Figs. 17, 18, 81-85)
Donovania procerula Monterosato 1889. Journ. de Conch., 37: 116. [Localidad tipo: Marruecos, Casa-
blanca (Ponsonby), Argelia (Joly)].
Chauvetia vulpécula Nordsieck y García-Talavera, 1979 non Lachesis vulpécula Monterosato, 1872.
Material tipo: Supuestamente en el ZMR. No examinado.
Otro material estudiado: CANARIAS: Gran Canaria: 3 c, 2 j, Arguineguín, (CHO); 2 c, Arguineguín,
150-180m (CHO); 1 c, TA007, frente a Sardina (CHO); 2 j, TalOl (CHO); 1 c, Ar301 (CHO). Fuerteventura:
1 c, 7 j, 100 m (CFS); 1 j. Playa Blanca, 70 m (CFS). Lanzarote: 9 j, Boccaina, Isla Graciosa (CFS).
124
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 81-85. Chauvetia procerula (Monterosato 1889); 81: concha, 4,7 mm, Arinaga, Gran
Canaria; 82-84: protoconcha; 85: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 81-85. Chauvetia procerula (Monterosato 1889); 81: shell, 4.7 mm, Arinaga, Gran Canaria;
82-84: protoconch; 85: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 17, 18, 81)
sólida, de perfil cónico algo ahusado
con vueltas algo convexas, sutura no
demasiado profunda y algo ondulada y
con unas 6 vueltas.
Protoconcha (Figs. 82-84) con aproxi-
madamente una vuelta, una anchura de
unas 580 pm (núcleo: 220 jum, primera
media vuelta: 320 pm) y unas 600 pm de
altura. Parte inicial globular, algo aguda.
Escultura (Fig. 85) formada por una
docena de cordoncillos espirales algo
más anchos que sus interespacios, en los
que aparecen las típicas incisiones carac-
terísticas de muchas Chauvetia. En el
tramo final de la protoconcha aparecen
unas pequeñas costillas que van aumen-
tando de relevancia a medida que se
aproxima al inicio de la teleoconcha. Las
costillas están curvadas superiormente,
delimitando un estrecho canal en la
parte superior de la protoconcha.
Teleoconcha con unas 5 vueltas, la úl-
tima ocupa cerca del 55 % de la altura to-
125
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
tal. Escultura constituida por costillas
axiales ortoclinas o ligeramente prosocli-
nas, fuertes, prominentes y algo más es-
trechas que sus interespacios. Cordones
espirales menos salientes que las costillas
y al cruzarse con ellas forman nodulos re-
dondeados. Son tan anchos como sus in-
terespacios. En la primera vuelta hay cua-
tro cordones siendo el superior el reborde
inferior de la sutura. En la última espira
hay nueve o diez costillas y trece o ca-
torce cordones espirales. De estos, hay
cinco por encima de la inserción labial,
los dos superiores más estrechos, y un
sexto a la altura de la misma inserción.
Abertura que representa el 37% de la
altura de la concha y en el interior se
pueden apreciar cinco o seis dientes.
siendo el inferior quien marca el inicio
del canal sifonal. Canal sifonal corto
pero evidente debido a la presencia de
una escotadura clara en la base del labio
externo y que caracteriza a la especie.
Coloración amarillenta. Algunas
conchas son blancas con los interespa-
cios de los cordones y la base rojiza.
Dimensiones: alcanza una altura de
hasta 6,7 mm y unos 2,8 mm de
anchura.
Distribución : La especie está presente
desde Canarias hasta el Mediterráneo.
Comentarios : Las conchas estudiadas
no presentan diferencias significativas
con las del Mediterráneo a pesar de
mostrar en su conjunto una cierta varia-
bilidad.
Chauvetia crassior (Odhner, 1932) (Figs. 19-24, 86-91)
Sintagma crassior Odhner, 1932: 20, lám. 1, fig. 5. [La Luz, Gran Canaria, Islas Canarias, 100 m].
Chauvetia obliqua Nordsiecky García-Talavera, 1979: 141, lám. 33, fig. 3.
Material tipo: Holotipo (MNHN) no examinado, aunque fotografiado (Figs. 19, 20).
Otro material estudiado: CANARIAS: Gran Canaria: 10 c, 5 j. El Cabrón (CFS); 12 j, NO Gran
Canaria (CFS); 1 c, Arinaga, NO Gran Canaria (CHO); 2 c, 1 j, Sardina, NO Gran Canaria, 15 m
(CHO); 1 c. Sardina, 15 m (CFS); 1 ej. Sardina, 58 m (CHO); 2 c, Sur de Gran Canaria, 35 m (CHO);
2 c. Dos Roques (CHO); 2 c. Gando, 8 m (CHO); 1 c. Gando 8/15/83 (CHO); 6 c, C0002 (CHO); 1 j,
Gran Canaria 28/02/02, 70 m (CHO); 2 j, RH020 (CHO); 35 ej y c. Punta del Tostón 28° 46' N, 13°
59' W, 400 m (CFS). Fuerteventura: 3 c, off la Entallada, 81-85 m (CHO); 3 c, C0012; 1 c, C0001 (CHO);
2 c, CL030 (CHO); 1 c, CFV065 (CHO); 1 c, AR301 (CHO); 1 c, RHI/3008, 85 m (CHO); 1 c, FH17
(CHO); 1 j. El Cabrón (CHO); 2 j, 1 f, AR016 (CHO); 2 ej, lote 307, C0005b (CHO); 1 c, lote 226, LTF
050 Candelaria, 80 m (CHO); 1 j, ArOOl, lote 259 (CHO); 1 e, lote 308, C0005B (CHO). Lanzarote: 1
c. Playa Reducto, Arrecife (CFS); 1 j, Pto. Carmen, 27 m (CHO); 5 c. Puerto del Carmen (CFS); 5 c,
Playa Honda, Pta Matagorda (CHO). Tenerife: 2 c, 60 m (CFS); 3 c, lotel7901 (MHNS); 3 c, lotel4781
(MHNS); 3 c, 2 j, Muellito del Faro, 15 m (CPB); 1 j. Cueva de las Corvinas, 28 m (CPB); 5 c. Cueva
de las Corvinas, 28 m (CPB); 2 c, Muellito del Faro, 3-12 m, (CPB); 1 j. Diente de Ajo, 0-25 m (CPB);
1 c, 1 j, Ballenita (CPB); 3 c, Ballenita, 12 m (CPB); 6 c, 4 j, Muellito del Faro 10-18 m (CPB); 1 j, en la
bahía Muellito del Faro 8-12 m (CPB); 3 j, 4 ej. Arco, 18 m (CPB). SAHARA: 1 c, 22° 35' N, 16° 58'
W (CHO); 2 ej, 23° 05' 35"N, 16° 25' 00"W (CHO). MAURITANIA: 1 c, Cabo Blanco, 80 m (CFS).
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 19-24, 86,
87) fusiforme, sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira y aspecto tosco. Proto-
concha (Figs. 88, 89) con una vuelta, y con
una anchura de unos 630 jUm (núcleo: 330
jum, primera media vuelta: 500 jum) y
unas 600 jum de altura. Escultura espiral
(Figs. 90, 91) formada por cordoncillos
estrechos de anchura desigual, poco defi-
nidos así como sus interespacios. Escul-
tura axial formada por unas cinco o seis
costillas que aparecen en el tramo final de
la protoconcha y que se van ensanchando
progresivamente. La transición con la
teleoconcha es difícil de apreciar y se ha
considerado que ocurre cuando aparecen
los cordones de ésta.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de cor-
dones espirales de anchura mayor que
sus interespacios. Las costillas, algo sig-
moideas, son prosoclinas y de anchura
similar o algo más estrechas que los inte-
respacios. En el inicio de la teleoconcha
aparecen cuatro cordones espirales
126
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 86-91. Chauvetia crassior (Odhner, 1932); 86, 87: conchas, 6,4, 3,4 mm, Playa Honda,
Punta Matagorda, Lanzarote; 88, 89: protoconcha; 90, 91: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 86-91. Chauvetia crassior (Odhner, 1932); 86, 87: shells, 6.4, 5.4 mm, Playa Honda, Punta
Matagorda, Lanzarote; 88, 89: protoconch; 90, 91: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
127
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
siendo el superior el reborde de la espira.
En la última vuelta hay cinco cordones
por encima de la inserción labial de los
que los dos superiores son de menor
anchura siendo el superior el reborde de
la sutura. Los tres inferiores son de
anchura similar y son planos y con poco
resalte. Hacia la base, aparecen una
docena de cordoncillos más. La escultura
axial de la última vuelta está formada por
una decena de costillas que apenas se
prolongan por debajo de la inserción
labial. Esta vuelta ocupa el 58 % de la
altura total de la concha.
Abertura oval, algo más rectilínea en
su parte externa, y que alcanza el 39%
de la altura de la concha. En el interior
del labio externo se aprecian cinco o seis
dientes, constituyendo el inferior el
borde externo del canal sifonal, que es
muy corto y bastante abierto.
Coloración: el color de la concha
puede ser castaño rojizo uniforme con el
interior blanco o amarillenta con una
banda rojiza subsutural y otra en la base
de la concha o sólo en la base de la
concha. Algunas conchas son marrón
oscuro, aunque puede aparecer una
banda blanca subsutural que afecta a los
dos o tres cordones espirales superiores.
Dimensiones: las conchas tienen una
altura máxima de hasta 8,8 mm.
Animal (Figs. 156, 157): Color crema-
amarillento con puntos blanquecinos;
sifón del mismo color.
Distribución : La especie ha sido
citada en las costas del sur de la Penín-
sula Ibérica (Micali, 1999), y está repre-
sentada en nuestro material del Sahara,
Canarias y en menor cantidad en Mauri-
tania.
Comentarios : Los pocos ejemplares
estudiados procedentes de la costas del
Sahara son más rechonchos con la boca
menos cuadrada que los de Canarias.
Odhner (1932) describió la especie para
Canarias y el holotipo es similar a las
conchas estudiadas del archipiélago. Por
ese motivo, a la forma de Sahara y Mau-
ritania se la ha considerado provisional-
mente como C. cf. crassior a la espera de
profundizar en su estudio.
La especie se puede confundir con C.
borgesi nov spec. (ver comentarios de
esta última).
Chauvetia obliqua Nordsieck y
García-Talavera, 1979, aparece en la
descripción original con unas dimensio-
nes de 6 x 3 mm. La localidad tipo es
Porto Santo. En el MNHC nos indican
que el tipo ha sido prestado y no está
disponible. Pero en el material del
MNHC hay otra concha muy similar,
con el mismo color y dimensiones y las
costillas prosoclinas, siendo también
procedente de Porto Santo. En cual-
quier caso, falta totalmente la protocon-
cha y la morfología de la concha está
dentro de la variabilidad típica de
Chauvetia crassior.
Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956 (Figs. 25, 26)
Chauvetia lamyi Knudsen, 1956. Atlantide Report, 4: 43, lám. 3, figs. 17, 18. [Localidad tipo: "Atlan-
tide" St. 56, frente a Liberia, 6°01,N, 10°26'W, 50 m]
Material tipo: No examinado. Supuestamente en ZMUC.
Material estudiado: SAHARA: 2 c, 22° 55' N 16° 05' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 251 23° 08' N, 16° 26' W
(CHO); 1 c, 1 j, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W, 29 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 199 (CHO); 1 c, lote244, 23° 05' N, 17° 00'
W (CHO); 1 ei, Peña Grande, 25° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 20 m (CHO). MAURITANIA: Baie de T Étoile: 1
c, intermareal (CHO).
Descripción : Ver Oliver y Rolán (2008).
Distribución: Costa oesteafricana,
desde Costa de Marfil por el sur estando
el límite norte de la especie en el Sahara.
Comentarios: Como se comenta en
Oliver y Rolán (2008) el taxon podría
incluir varias especies crípticas. Las
conchas estudiadas en el presente
trabajo no muestran diferencias signifi-
cativas que indiquen que pueda
tratarse de una especie distinta a la de
Senegal.
128
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Chauvetia javieri Oliver y Rolán, 2008 (Figs. 27-30, 92-99)
Chauvetia javieri Oliver y Rolan, 2008. Iberus, 26(2): 162, figs. 45-48, 74, 144-151. [Cap Vert, pecio
del "Tacoma", Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 30 m].
Material tipo: Holotipo en MNCN (15.05/ 47529). Paratipos: 54 en varias colecciones (ver Oliver
y Rolán, 2008).
Otro material estudiado: SAHARA: 17 c, West Sahara, lote 292, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, 58 m (CHO);
1 c, lote 264, M15, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W (CHO); 6 c, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W, 84 m (CHO); 3 c, lote 299,
M13, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 293, 22° 35' N, 18° 58' W, 58 m, (CHO); 1 c, lote 286, 22°
00' N, 17° 22' W (CHO); 8 c, lote 287, Sur Peña Grande, 24° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 32 m (CHO); 4 c, lote
206, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 265, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 3 c, lote 267, 24° 28' N, 15°
51' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 279, 23° 05' N, 16° 27' W (CHO); 4 c, lote 260, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W (CHO); 1
c, lote 252, Sur Peña Grande, 24° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 32 m (CHO); 4 c, lote 282, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W
(CHO); 4 c, lote 278, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 285, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W (CHO); 4 c, lote
261, 22° 55' N, 16° 36' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 273, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 277, 22° 00' N, 16°
35' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 274, 22° 34' N, 16° 58' W (CHO); 1 ej, lote 269, 24° 32' N, 15° 51' W (CHO); 1
c, lote 272, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 1 ej, lote 217, 22° 51' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 8 c, 22° 35' N, 16°
58' W, 58 m, (CHO); 1 c, lote 214, 22° 55' N, 16° 35' W (CHO); 2 j, lote 289, 24° 45' N, 15° 25' W (CHO);
2 c, 20° 15' N, 16° 41' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 207, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W (CHO); 2 c, lote 211, 23° 15' N, 16°
40' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 221, 22° 17' N, 17° 22' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 203, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W (CHO); 1
c, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W, 84 m (CHO); 2 c, M/8-9, 23° 05' N, 11° 20' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 235, 23° 08' N,
16° 20' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 243 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 1 c, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W, 30 m (CHO); 1
ej, lote 245, 23° 05' N, 16° 27' W (CHO); 1 c, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W, 84 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 234, 25° 25'
N, 15° 02' W (CHO); 1 c, 22° 17' N, 17° 22' W, 84 m (CHO); 1 c. Cape Barba, 58 m, 22° 35' N, 16° 58'
W, (CHO); 1 ej, lote 258, 22° 35' N, 16° 25' W, I15f, (CHO); 45 ej, varias etiquetas de localización
(CHO); 6 ej, lote 257, 24° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 20 m. Peña Grande (CHO); 7 ej, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W, 40
m (CHO); 37 ej, varias etiquetas de localización (2) 36 m (CHO); 2 ej, 25° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 36 m.
Peña Grande (CHO); 1 ej, lote 226, 25° 51' N, 15° 02' W (CHO); 2 c, (CPR); 20 c, barcos de pesca
(MHNS). MAURITANIA: 2 c, lote 224, MM0004 (CHO); 5 c, material de barcos de pesca (MHNS).
Descripción : Concha (ver Oliver y
Rolán, 2008). Representada en este
trabajo (Figs. 21, 22, 92-94). Protocon-
chas (Figs. 95-99).
Distribución : Conocida de Senegal,
Mauritania y Sahara.
Comentarios: Durante el tiempo en el
que el trabajo de descripción de esta
especie fue publicado, Ardovini (2008)
describió una especie de Senegal con el
nombre de C. bartolomeoi. Este trabajo
carece de fotografías al microscopio
electrónico y de los detalles finos de la
escultura; hace comparación de la
especie con sólo otras dos diferentes y,
aunque menciona que debe compararse
con una tercera, esta comparación no
aparece en el texto. Además, no se
señala holotipo, aunque se presenta una
imagen; no se dan sus dimensiones, ni
se deposita en museo alguno. Algunos
de estos datos aparecen en un trabajo
anónimo en un número posterior
fechado en Octubre de 2008, pero que
fue recibido mucho tiempo después. Por
todo ello, nosotros seguimos conside-
rando como válido el nombre de C.
javieri.
Las conchas de C. javieri de Sahara
presentan algunas diferencias con res-
pecto a las del Sahara. La abertura bucal
no es tan prominente y sus costillas y
sus cordones suelen ser tan anchos
como sus interespacios mientras que en
la de Senegal suelen ser más anchos. En
cuanto al número de cordones por
encima de la inserción labial y a su pro-
toconcha no se han comprobado dife-
rencias significativas, aunque se ha
observado en las conchas del Sahara
cierta variabilidad. Por otra parte, las
conchas de C. javieri de esta zona suelen
ser de color castaño rojizo mientras que
las de Senegal son amarillentas con una
franja rojiza en la base. No obstante
también se han estudiado algunas
conchas con esta última tonalidad así
como otras de color totalmente blanco.
129
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Figuras 92-99. Chauvetia javieri Oliver y Rolán, 2008; 92-94: conchas, 7,8, 6,5, 7,0 mm, Sahara;
95-99: protoconchas.
Figures 92-99. Chauvetia- javieri Oliver and Rolán, 2008; 92-94: shells, 7.8, 6.5, 7.0 mm, Sahara;
95-99: protoconchs.
130
Olí VER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 100-103. Chauvetia tenebrosa Oliver y Rolán, 2008; 100: concha, 3,6 mm, Nouadhibou,
Mauritania; 101, 102: protoconcha; 103: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 100-103. Chauvetia tenebrosa Oliver and Rolán, 2008; 100: shell, 3.6 mm, Nouadhibou,
Mauritania; 101, 102: protoconch; 103: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
Chauvetia joani Oliver y Rolán, 2008 (Fig. 31)
Chauvetia joani Oliver y Rolán, 2008. Iberus, 26(2): 164, figs. 49-52, 75, 152-159, 188. [Cap Vert,
"Tacoma", Bahía de Dakar, Senegal, 13 m].
Material tipo: Holotipo en MNCN (15.05/47530). Paratipos: 16 en varias colecciones (ver Oliver
y Rolán, 2008).
Otro material estudiado: MAURITANIA: 2 c, 2 j
Descripción : Concha y protoconcha
(ver Oliver y Rolán, 2008).
Distribución: Conocida previamente
de Senegal, su área de distribución se ha
encontrado ahora ampliada hasta Mau-
Baie de 1' Étoile (MHNS).
ritania, aunque aquí se ha encontrado
en escasa cantidad.
Comentarios: No hay diferencias con
el material ahora estudiado y el material
tipo.
Chauvetia tenebrosa Oliver y Rolán, 2008 (Figs. 32, 100-103)
Chauvetia tenebrosa Oliver y Rolán, 2008. Iberus, 26(2): 148, figs. 7-9, 67, 114-120. [Pecio del
"Tacoma", Dakar, Senegal, entre 20 y 30 m].
Material tipo: Holotipo en MNCN (15.05/47536). Paratipos: 212 en diferentes colecciones (ver
Oliver y Rolán, 2008).
Otro material estudiado: MAURITANIA: 17 c, 5 j, Baie de 1' Étoile, Nouadibou (CHO).
131
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Descripción : Concha: Ver Oliver y
Rolán, 2008 (Figs. 32, 100). La proto-
concha (Figs. 101-103) del material de
Mauritania tiene una vuelta de espira,
el núcleo mide unos 220 jum, la primera
media vuelta unos 390 pm y el
diámetro total es de unas 540 jum;
altura de unas 500 pm.
Distribución : Descrita del área de
Dakar, Senegal, se ha encontrado ahora
en Mauritania. Hay unas citas de Daut-
zenberg (1910) de Donovania mínima
Montagu, 1803 en Baie de Cansado y
Pointe du Repos, que podrían referirse a
esta especie.
Comentarios: Las conchas de Mauri-
tania son muy semejantes a las de
Senegal aunque en ellas se marca menos
la diferencia de coloración entre los cor-
dones espirales y sus interespacios (más
claros y más semejantes en color que en
las conchas de Senegal). Esta especie se
puede confundir fácilmente con formas
oscuras de C. affinis. Se distingue de ella
principalmente por tener una última
vuelta proporcionalmente más ancha,
un canal sifonal algo más marcado y
una sutura más profunda debido funda-
mentalmente al hundimiento la parte
superior de la espira.
Chauvetia errata spec. nov. (Figs. 33-35, 104-108)
Donovania affinis en Dautzenberg, 1910, Actes Soc. Linn. Bordeaux: 66 (non Donovania affinis Monte-
rosato, 1889)
Chauvetia affinis en Oliver y Rolán, 2008, Iberus, 26(2): 138, figs. 13, 14, 68, 93-98, 181, 189. (non
Donovania affinis Monterosato, 1889).
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 33, 34) en MNHN. Ha sido representada en Dautzenberg (1910)
como C. affinis en dragados frente Bel-Air y al oeste de Cap Rouge, Mission Gruvel. Paratipos:
MNCN (1, 15.05/51080), MHNS (7) (Fig. 35), BMNH (1), CPR (1), CFS (1); todos conchas de
Gorée, Dakar, Senegal.
Otro material examinado: MAURITANIA: 7 j, Baie de T Étoile, Mauritania. Para otro material de
SENEGAL: Ver Oliver y Rolán (2008).
Localidad tipo: Cap Rouge, Senegal.
Etimología: El nombre específico deriva de la palabra latina erratus, que significa equivocado, alu-
diendo al error en la determinación que se produjo en el anterior trabajo.
Descripción: Ver Oliver y Rolán
(2008: 138, como Chauvetia affinis). Trans-
cribimos aquí la descripción puesto que
ahora se trata de una diferente conside-
ración de la especie:
Concha (Figs. 33-35, 104, 105) fusi-
forme, aunque más cilindrica que otras
del género, sólida, con unas seis vueltas
de espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 106-108) paucis-
piral, con 0,8 vueltas, una anchura de
430 jum y una altura de 480 ¡um (núcleo:
270 pm y la primera media vuelta: 425
pm). Su escultura está formada, como
en otras Chauvetia, por cordones espira-
les planos entre los que se aprecian
surcos con incisiones axiales y que, al
final, son unos 10 a 12 en número, algo
variables, y más anchos que los interes-
pacios. Al final de la protoconcha se
aprecian unas cinco costillas axiales.
Teleoconcha con cuatro cordones
espirales en la primera vuelta, el inferior
más estrecho, y un quinto por arriba que
está menos desarrollado y constituye un
reborde inferior de la sutura. Un sexto
cordón aparece en la penúltima vuelta a
partir del cordón superior. La última
vuelta representa el 55% de la altura
total y, en ella, se aprecian seis cordones
por encima de la inserción labial. De
ellos los superiores están más juntos y
son menos anchos que los restantes. Los
interespacios son de una anchura
similar a la de los cordones. En la base
de la concha hay una decena de cordo-
nes que se van aproximando entre sí a
medida que se acercan al final del canal
sifonal. Las costillas axiales son casi
ortoclinas y poco elevadas, y al cruzarse
con los cordones espirales se forman
tubérculos redondeados muy evidentes.
132
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 104-108. Chauvetia errata spec. noy.; 104: concha, 5,7 mm, Dakar, Senegal; 105: concha, 2,4
mm, Baie de l’Étoile, Mauritania; 106, 107: protoconcha, Dakar; 108: protoconcha, Mauritania.
Figures 104-108. Chauvetia errata spec. nov.; 104: shell, 5.7 mm, Dakar, Senegal; 105: shell, 2.4 mm,
Baie de l’Etoile, Mauritania; 106, 107: protoconch, Dakar; 108: protoconch, Mauritania.
En la última vuelta hay una veintena de
costillas verticales, de anchura similar a
los interespacios.
Abertura ovoide, representando el
37% de la altura total de la concha. El
color de la misma es castaño, igual que
la concha, y en ella se observan cinco
dientes en el interior del labio externo.
El inferior de ellos constituye el inicio
del canal sifonal, que es corto y poco
aparente.
Coloración de la concha castaño-
rojiza. La base es algo más oscura y los
tubérculos ligeramente más claros; la
protoconcha puede tener un color más
claro con una banda oscura en su centro.
Dimensiones : tiene una máxima
dimensión de hasta 6 mm.
133
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Animal blanco crema con aislados
puntos blancos. Sifón más intenso de
color. Opérculo (Oliver y Rolán, 2008:
fig. 181) ovoide con el núcleo subtermi-
nal. Rádula (Oliver y Rolán, 2008: fig.
189) típica, con más de 150 filas de
dientes, central rectangular, laterales con
tres cúspides, la interna más pequeña.
Distribución : Conocida de Senegal,
pero su área de distribución se extiende
hasta Mauritania.
Comentarios : Aunque solo se ha
encontrado en el actual área de estudio
una escasa cantidad de material de esta
especie, consideramos que es la misma
especie que fue mencionada como Chau-
vetia affinis en un trabajo anterior
(Oliver y Rolán, 2008). Después de su
nuevo estudio, hemos comprobado que
se trata de una especie válida diferente
del taxon en la que se había situado
incorrectamente en la publicación ante-
rior, por lo cual le damos nombre en el
presente trabajo.
La descripción original de Monte-
rosato (1889) de Chauvetia affinis está
basada en un único ejemplar recogido
en Casablanca, al cual considera
próximo a Chauvetia mínima. En ese
trabajo, Monterosato comenta que el
motivo de considerarla una especie
nueva es que había visto ejemplares
mediterráneos de Taormina, Sicilia y de
Pantellaria. En el MNHN se han encon-
trado conchas de la Chauvetia cf. affinis
de localidad siciliana, enviadas por
Monteroato a Locard y presumible-
mente son las que han sido considera-
das como Chauvetia turritellata por
Micali (1999).
Varias son las especies con las que C.
errata puede confundirse y con algunas
de ellas comparte área de distribución.
Así entre éstas tenemos a C. lamyi, C.
pardacuta, C. joani y C. tenebrosa. Fuera
del área de distribución se podría con-
fundir con C. affinis , con C. brunnea, con
C. mamillata o con conchas oscuras de C.
procer uta.
De C. lamyi se distingue por no tener
tan evidente el canal sifonal. De C. joani,
de C. tenebrosa y de C. pardacuta por ser
menos fusiforme y por presentar un
mayor número de costillas que al cru-
zarse con los cordones forman tubércu-
los redondeados. Además el canal
sifonal no está tan inclinado como
sucede en C. joani.
Fuera del área de distribución de la
especie guarda semejanza con C. affinis
con la que se ha confudido taxonómica-
mente, dado el parecido de su escultura.
Se diferencia de ésta por tener más costi-
llas que además son más estrechas y
delicadas así como por la escultura de la
protoconcha: C. errata tiene menos cor-
dones y son claramente más anchos que
sus interespacios lo que no sucede en las
distintas variedades de C. affinis. Lo
mismo se puede decir para distinguirla
de C. brunnea y de C. mamillata. Por
último la protoconcha de C. procerula es
más parecida a la de C. errata pero la
concha de C. procerula tiene un canal
sifonal claro y unas costillas poco nume-
rosas y evidentes.
Chauvetia megastoma spec. nov. (Figs. 36, 109-113)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 36, 109) en MNCN (15.05/51081) ex CHO.
Otro material estudiado: 1 j, de la localidad tipo, en MHNS.
Localidad tipo: Mauritania, 23° 15' N, 16° 06' W, a unos 200 m, en barcos de pesca.
Etimología: El nombre específico alude al tamaño de la abertura que es en proporción el más grande
del género en relación a la altura de la concha.
Descripción: Concha (Fig. 36, 109)
fusiforme, con cinco vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 110, 111) con una
vuelta, y con una anchura de unos 670
¡um (núcleo: 320 pm, primera media
vuelta: 520 ¡um) y unas 630 pm de altura.
Escultura basada cordoncillos espirales
irregulares y poco definidos (Fig. 112)
separados por interespacios más defini-
dos, y en los que no se aprecian clara-
mente las típicas incisiones de las Chau-
vetia. Con gran aumento (Fig. 113)
134
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 109-113. Chauvetia megastoma spec. noy.; 109: holotipo, 7,2 mm (MNCN); 110, 111:
protoconcha del holotipo; 112-113: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 109-113. Chauvetia megastoma spec. nov .; 109: holotype, 7.2 mm (MNCN); 110, 111: pro-
toconch ofthe holotype; 112-113: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
135
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
pueden verse diminutas perforaciones.
Tiene una treintena de costillas axiales
algo sigmoideas y opistoclinas, poco
relevantes, que se inician cerca del
núcleo de la protoconcha, y son más
estrechas que sus intervalos.
Teleoconcha con vueltas claramente
convexas. Escultura de cordones espira-
les de anchura similar a sus interespa-
cios al igual que sucede con las costillas.
En el inicio de la teleoconcha aparecen
cinco cordones espirales. En la última
vuelta hay seis cordones por encima de
la inserción labial y, hacia la base, apare-
cen de una docena de cordoncillos más.
La escultura axial está formada por cos-
tillas convexas algo prosoclinas, una
decena en la última vuelta. La última
vuelta ocupa el 64 % de la altura total de
la concha.
Abertura oval que alcanza el 43% de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo de la concha estudiada no
se han apreciado dientes salvo el
pliegue que marca el inicio del borde
externo del canal sifonal, que es corto
pero claro y bastante abierto.
El color de la concha es blanco.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 7,2 x 3,0 mm.
Animal: Desconocido.
Distribución: La especie sólo ha sido
recolectada en Mauritania.
Comentarios: Pese a la escasez de
material, hemos decidido darle nombre
porque tiene diferencias muy evidentes
con las demás especies conocidas.
Se diferencia de C. javieri por tener
las vueltas más convexas y la sutura
más profunda, la última vuelta y la
abertura proporcionalmente más altas y
el canal sifonal más abierto en su parte
superior. También hay diferencia en la
escultura de la protoconcha, que en
Chauvetia javieri tiene un mayor número
de condoncillos axiales, que están más
marcados.
De Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov. se
diferencia por el perfil más regular de
sus vueltas, por la escultura de su proto-
concha y por tener también proporcio-
nalmente más alta tanto la última vuelta
como su abertura.
De Chauvetia edentula spec. nov. (ver
más abajo) se distingue claramente por
su protoconcha y por la forma y el
tamaño de su abertura bucal.
Chauvetia gigantissina sp. spec. nov. (Figs. 37-39)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 38) en MNCN (15.05/51082). Paratipos: 1 ej, Cabo Barbas, 22° 35' N,
16° 58' W, 32 m (MNHN); 1 c (Fig. 37), supuestamente, Sahara Occidental (CJH).
Localidad tipo: Sahara Occidental, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W.
Etimología: El nombre específico hace alusión al gran tamaño de la especie, superior al de todas
las conocidas en el género.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 37, 38)
fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con unas
nueve vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Fig. 39) blanca, con 0,7
vueltas, y una anchura de unos 1000
ium (núcleo: 700 jum, primera media
vuelta: 900 p) y unas 1000 pm de
altura; las protoconchas estudiadas
estaban algo erosionadas y no se pudo
apreciar bien su escultura espiral,
aunque la axial estaba reducida a unas
pocas costillas al final de la proto-
concha.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de
cordones espirales con anchura similar a
sus interespacios al igual que sus costi-
llas. En el inicio de la teleoconcha apare-
cen cuatro cordones espirales de los que
el superior forma el reborde de la espira.
No es hasta la sexta o séptima vuelta
cuando aparece un quinto cordón a
partir del cordón superior. Estos dos
cordones son difícilmente distinguibles,
tienen menor anchura, y se mantienen
así hasta la última vuelta. En ésta, por
encima de la inserción labial, están estos
cinco cordones, y por debajo de ella hay
una docena más que van disminuyendo
en anchura y aproximándose entre ellos
a medida que avanzan hacia el canal
sifonal donde quedan muy juntos. La
escultura axial es similar en grosor y
1 36
OLIVER Y ROLAN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 114-119. Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov.; 114, 115: 6,3 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16° 28’ W,
Sahara; 116, 117: protoconchas; 118, 119: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 114-119. Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov.; 114, 115: 6.3 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16° 28’W, Sahara;
116, 117: protoconchs; 118, 119: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
137
Iberas, 27 (2), 2009
está formada por costillas ortoclinas o
muy poco prosoclinas, curvadas, que
apenas se prolongan por debajo de la
inserción labial acabando cerca del
inicio del canal sifonal. Hay una vein-
tena de costillas en la última vuelta. Al
cruzarse cordones y costillas se forman
nodulos ovoides. La ultima vuelta
ocupa el 46 % de la altura total de la
concha.
Abertura oval que alcanza el 32% de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo se aprecian unos siete
dientes de los que el inferior constituye
el borde externo del canal sifonal. No se
aprecia una escotadura clara en la base
del labio externo por lo que el canal
sifonal es corto y poco claro
Coloración de la concha castaño
rojiza, con la protoconcha, el fondo de
las primeras vueltas, y parte de la base y
del canal sifonal muy claros, casi
blancos.
Dimensiones: el holotipo mide 14,2 x
4,7 mm; el paratipo con la protoconcha
rota (Fig. 37) mide 19,7 mm, y el otro
paratipo con la protoconcha erosionada
19,9 mm.
Animal: Desconocido.
Distribución : Sólo conocida de
Sahara. Una concha encontrada en
Canarias, lo fue en un lugar de descarga
de pescado, por lo que se puede
suponer que tiene el mismo origen que
el holotipo.
Comentarios : Se ha escogido como
holotipo a la concha de menor tamaño
por tener la protoconcha en mejor
estado.
Esta especie por su tamaño (casi el
doble de la mayoría de las especies del
género) se diferencia de todas las cono-
cidas tanto del Mediterráneo como de
Senegal. Por otra parte, el patrón de
color es totalmente diferente de todas
ellas. La más próxima por color y
tamaño sería Chauvetia gigantea Oliver y
Rolán, 2008, de Senegal, pero se diferen-
cia porque esta última tiene la protocon-
cha ligeramente más pequeña, la base y
el ápice son menos blancos, las primeras
vueltas de espira (hasta casi la penúl-
tima) tienen solamente tres cordones
espirales (contra 4-5 en la aquí descrita),
los nodulos de entrecruzamiento de cor-
dones y costillas son más claros y tanto
costillas como cordones son menos pro-
minentes.
Chauvetia hernandezi spec. nov. (Figs. 40-44, 114-119)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 40, 41) en el MNCN (15.05/51083). Paratipos en las siguientes
colecciones: MNHN (1) (Fig. 42); MHNS (1) (Fig. 43, 44); BMNH (1), CPR (1), todos de la locali-
dad tipo; CPB (1) (Fig. 114) de 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W, Sahara; CHO, de varias localidades del
Sahara Occidental: (5 c) 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W; (4 c) 25° 45' N, 15° 25' W, Peña Grande, 36 m.
Otro material examinado: SAHARA: 1 j, 50-60 m (CFS); 2 c, 1 j, lote 281, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W
(CHO); 7 c, lote 294, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W, 34 m (CHO); 4 c, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W, 84 m (CHO);
1 c, lote 283, 24° 81' N, 15° 51' W (CHO); 6 c, 23° 65' N, 15° 51' W (CHO); 1 c, lote276, 22° 55'
N, 16° 36' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 202, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 268, 24° 28' N, 15° 51'
W (CHO); 19 c, lote 293, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, 58 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 249, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W,
84 m (CHO); 7 c, lote 270, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W (CHO); 2 c, lote 217, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W
(CHO); 1 c, lote 237, 24° 05' N, 15° 25' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 206, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W (CHO); 1
c, 1 j, lote 267, 24° 28' N, 15° 51' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 238, 24° 05' N, 15° 25' W (CHO); 1 c, lote
292, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, 58 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 300, 22° 17' N, 17° 22' W, 84 m (CHO); 2 c, lote
291, M / 8-9, 23° 05' N, 16° 28' W, 2 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 289, 24° 51' N, 15° 25' W (CHO); 1 c, lote
216, 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 3 c, lote 253, Sur Peña Grande 24° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 32 m
(CHO); 1 c, lote 255, 23° 08' N, 16° 00' W (CHO); 1 c, lote 233, 23° 08' N, 16° 20' W (CHO); 3
c, M-13, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W, 36 m (CHO); 2 c, lote 284, 24° 28' N, 15° 51' W (CHO); 3 c, lote
209, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W (CHO); 1 j, lote 263, 25° 17' N, 15° 22' W (CHO); 3 c, lote 266, 22° 05'
N, 17° 11' W (CHO); 1 c, 23° 10' N, 16° 28' W, 64 m, arrastre (CHO); 1 c, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W,
90 m, arrastre en arena (CHO); 2 c, lote 242, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W (CHO); 1 c, M/8-9, 23° 05'
N, 16° 28' W, 30 m (CHO); 1 c, lote 236, 23° 08' N, 16° 26' W (CHO); 1 ej, 2345, 24° 00' N, 16°
00' W 30-35 m (CHO); 5 ej, lote 258, 23° 08' N, 16° 25' W, 30 m (CHO); 3 ej, lote 257, 25° 45' N,
138
Olí VER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 120-124. Chauvetia distans spec. nov.; 120: holotipo, 6,8 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16° 35’ W, 37
m (MNCN); 121: detalle de la abertura; 122, 123: protoconcha; 124: microescultura de la proto-
concha.
Figures 120-124. Chauvetia distans spec. nov.; 120: holotype, 6.8 mm, 23° 05’ N, 16° 35’ W, 37 m
(MNCN); 121: detail ofthe aperture; 122, 123: protoconch; 124: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
139
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
15° 25' W, Peña Grande, 36 m (CHO); 48 ej, varias etiquetas de localización 10-20 m (CHO); 2
ej, 25° 45' N, 15° 25' W, 35 m. Peña Grande (CHO); 3 c, lote 249 (MHNS). MAURITANIA: 1 c,
lote 223, MM0004 (CHO).
Localidad tipo: Sahara Occidental, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W, Cabo Barba, 58 m.
Etimología: La especie se dedica a la memoria de José María Hernández, malacólogo de
Gáldar, Gran Canaria, que contribuyó a este trabajo con una gran cantidad de material de su
colección.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 40-44, 114,
115) fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con
unas siete vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 116, 117) con una
vuelta y con una anchura de unos 700
¡um (núcleo: 410 pm, primera media
vuelta: 600 jum) y unas 380 jum de altura.
Escultura formada por una veintena de
cordoncillos espirales planos, de
anchura variable separados por interes-
pacios que presentan las típicas incisio-
nes del género (Fig. 119) y cuya anchura
es por lo general menor o igual que la
de los cordones. Al final de la protocon-
cha aparecen unas ocho costillitas muy
juntas y la escultura de los interespecios
de los cordones desaparece (Fig. 118).
Teleoconcha: El perfil de las vueltas
es convexo con la sutura profunda,
aunque la mitad superior de la espira es
ligeramente cóncava. Escultura de cor-
dones espirales de anchura desigual
(los superiores son más estrechos)
aunque similares o algo más estrecho
que sus respectivos interespacios. Cos-
tillas menos anchas que sus interespa-
cios y que suelen ser más relevantes
hacia el final de la concha. En el inicio
de la teleoconcha aparecen seis cordo-
nes espirales siendo el superior el
reborde de la espira. En la última vuelta
hay ocho cordones por encima de la
inserción labial de los que los tres (o
cuatro) superiores son claramente de
menor anchura y, hacia la base, aparece
una quincena de cordoncillos más. Los
superiores están claramente separados
por interespacios claros y a medida que
se acercan al canal sifonal se van apro-
ximando entre ellos, quedando los más
inferiores muy juntos. La escultura
axial está formada por costillas conve-
xas ortoclinas o muy poco prosoclinas,
una decena en la última vuelta que
apenas se prolongan por debajo de la
inserción labial. La ultima vuelta ocupa
el 58 % de la altura total de la concha.
Con grandes aumentos es posible
observar escultura axial muy fina entre
los cordones, como líneas de creci-
miento muy marcadas.
Abertura oval que alcanza el 40% de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo se aprecian de siete a diez
dientes siendo el inferior el borde
externo del canal sifonal, que es corto y
bastante abierto.
Coloración de la concha marrón
amarillento o rojizo, aunque hay
conchas totalmente blancas.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 8,6 x 3,6 mm;
paratipos de unas dimensiones simila-
res, alguno llega a 11 mm.
Animal: El animal es blanco grisáceo
con puntos blanco amarillentos.
Distribución : La especie estaría pre-
sente en gran abundancia en Sahara. No
obstante, en el material estudiado, hay
una concha recolectada en Mauritania.
Comentarios : La especie mediterránea
más parecida es Chauvetia procerula, de
la que se distinguiría por tener un canal
sifonal menos definido y por presentar
más cordones espirales (ocho en la
última espira frente a los cinco de C. pro-
cerula).
De las especies africanas la más
parecida es Chauvetia distans spec. nov.
(ver comentarios en esta última). Tam-
bién se podría confundir con Chauvetia
joani, con C. javieri o con Chauvetia
megastoma. De C. joani se distinguiría
por el mayor número de cordones espi-
rales en su última vuelta y porque el
canal sifonal no presenta la tendencia
tan acusada de inclinarse hacia la
derecha. De C. javieri se distingue fun-
damentalmente por su protoconcha ya
que sólo presenta claramente unas
pocas costillas localizadas al final de la
protoconcha. Respecto a C. megastoma
ver comentarios en esta especie.
140
Olí VER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 125-130. Chauvetia austera spec. nov.; 125: paratipo, 7,8 mm, 23° 05’ N, 17° 00’ W,
Sahara (MNHN). 126: detalle de la abertura; 127: protoconcha; 128, 129: microescultura de la
protoconcha; 130: microescultura de la teleoconcha.
Figures 125-130. Chauvetia austera spec. nov.; 125: paratype, 7.8 mm, 23° 05’ N, 17° 00’ W, Sahara
(MNHN). 126: detail ofthe aperture; 127: protoconch; 128, 129: microsculpture of the protoconch;
130: microsculpture of the teleoconch.
141
Iberus , 27 (2), 2009
Chauvetia distans spec. nov. (Figs. 45-48, 120-124)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 45, 46, 120) en el MNCN (15.05/51084). Paratipos del Sahara Occi-
dental: MNHN (1) (Fig. 47) 23° 05' N, 16° 00' W; BMNH (1) 23° 05' N, 17° 05' W (Fig. 48); CPR (1)
23° 05' N, 17° 05' W; CHO (4 c en varios lotes): (2 c) 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W; (1 c) 22° 05' N, 17° 11' W ;
(1 c) 23° 05' N, 17° 05' W; MHNS (1 c) lote 225, 23° 15’ N, 16° 40' W, Mauritania.
Localidad tipo: Sahara Occidental, 23° 05' N, 16° 35' W, 37 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico alude a la separación existente entre las costillas axiales.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 45-48, 120)
fusiforme, sólida, con unas seis vueltas
de espira convexas.
Protoconcha (Figs. 122, 123) con una
vuelta, y con una anchura de unos 610
¡um (núcleo: 310 ¡um, primera media
vuelta: 500 pm) y unas 650 jum de altura;
escultura basada en los típicos cordones
espirales separados por interespacios
con incisiones típicas de las Chauvetia
(Fig. 124). Hay una quincena de cordo-
nes espirales planos, de anchura pare-
cida y claramente más anchos que los
interespacios. En el último cuarto de la
protoconcha aparecen unas ocho costilli-
tas que van ensanchándose a medida
que nos acercamos al final de la proto-
concha.
Teleoconcha con perfil de las vueltas
convexo y la sutura profunda aunque la
mitad superior de la espira es ligera-
mente cóncava. Los cordones espirales
son de anchura desigual similar a sus
interespacios. Costillas convexas menos
anchas que sus interespacios. En el
inicio de la teleoconcha aparecen unos
cinco o seis cordones espirales de los
que el superior constituye el reborde de
La espira. En la última vuelta hay ocho
cordones por encima de la inserción
labial siendo los cuatro superiores clara-
mente más estrechos que los inferiores.
Hacia la base, aparece una quincena de
cordoncillos más. La escultura axial está
formada por costillas ortoclinas, una
decena en la última vuelta que se pro-
longan algo por debajo de la inserción
labial, acabando cerca del inicio del
canal sifonal. El contorno de las vueltas
es algo dentado debido a la prominencia
de los cordones espirales. En la mitad
inferior de la última vuelta los cordones
espirales son más finos y están más
juntos. Esta última vuelta ocupa el 60 %
de la altura total de la concha.
Abertura (Figs. 121) redondeada que
alcanza el 39% de la altura de la concha.
En el interior del labio externo se apre-
cian unos siete dientes de los que el infe-
rior constituye el borde externo del
canal sifonal. El canal sifonal es, aunque
corto, claro debido tanto al ligero estre-
chamiento de la parte inferior del borde
externo del canal sifonal como a la pre-
sencia de una clara escotadura en la
base del labio externo.
Color de la concha crema con la base
blanca, aunque hay conchas totalmente
blancas.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 6,8 mm;
paratipos con unas dimensiones simila-
res, alguno algo mayor.
Animal: Desconocido.
Distribución : Mauritania y Sahara.
Comentarios: Se podría confundir con
ejemplares de Chauvetia hernandezi spec.
nov. ya que ambas tienen un similar
perfil de espira pero su escultura más
pronunciada y su evidente canal sifonal
las diferencian. También la protoconcha
de C. distans spec. nov. presenta menos
cordones, que son más anchos y sus cos-
tillas parecen ser más pronunciadas que
las de C. hernadezi.
Chauvetia austera spec. nov. (Figs. 49-52, 125-130)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 49, 50) en MNCN (15.05/51085). Paratipo (Fig. 51) en MNHN.
Localidad tipo: Sahara Occidental, 23° 05' N, 17° 00' W (exCHO)
Etimología: El nombre específico hace alusión a que la especie no tiene muchas diferencias en sus
caracteres morfológicos generales sobre otras del grupo.
142
Oliver Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 131-137. Chauvetia peculiaris spec. noy.; 131: paratipo, 3,8 mm, 22° 00’ N, 17° 22’ W, 46
m; 132: holotipo, 7,7 mm, 22° 00’ N, 17° 22’ W, 46 m (MNCN). 133, 134: protoconcha; 133:
detalle de la microescultura de la protoconcha; 136; detalle de la escultura de la teleoconcha; 137:
opérculo, 1,3 mm.
Figures 131-137. Chauvetia peculiaris spec. nov.; 131: paratype, 5.8 mm, 22° 00’ N, 17° 22’ W, 46 m;
132: holotype, 7.7 mm, 22° 00’ N, 17° 22’ W, 46 m (MNCN). 133, 134: protoconch; 135: detailofthe
microsculpture ofthe protoconch; 136; detail ofthe sculpture ofthe teleoconch; 137: operculum, 1.3 mm.
143
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 49-51, 125)
fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Fig. 52, 127) con 0,8
vueltas, y con una anchura de unos 720
pm (núcleo: 600 pm, primera media
vuelta: 670 pm) y unas 600 pm de altura.
Escultura espiral obsoleta (Figs. 128,
129) y costillas fuertes iniciándose prác-
ticamente al finalizar el núcleo. La tran-
sición con la teleoconcha, si nos fijamos
en su escultura, no resulta tan clara
como en otras Chauvetia pero el cambio
de color, dado que su protoconcha es
blanca, nos ayuda a apreciarla.
Teleoconcha con vueltas de perfil pla-
noconvexo con la sutura poco profunda.
Escultura basada en cordones espirales
con anchura similar a sus interespacios al
igual que sus costillas que son poco pro-
nunciadas. En el inicio de la teleoconcha
aparecen cuatro cordones espirales, for-
mando el superior el reborde de la espira.
En la cuarta vuelta aparece por encima de
éste un quinto cordón. En la última
vuelta hay cinco cordones por encima de
la inserción labial prácticamente de la
misma anchura y, hacia la base, aparecen
seis o siete cordoncillos más. La escultura
axial, poco pronunciada, es similar en
grosor y está formada por costillas orto-
dinas o muy poco prosoclinas, que son
unas dieciocho en la última vuelta. Se
prolongan por debajo de la inserción
labial acabando cerca del inicio del canal
sifonal. Al cruzarse cordones y costillas
se forman nodulos redondeados. Con
grandes aumentos (Fig. 130) puede apre-
ciarse una microescultura muy fina de
líneas axiales y algunos filetes espirales
irregulares. La última vuelta ocupa el 55
% de la altura total de la concha.
Abertura oval que alcanza el 38 % de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo se aprecian cuatro dientes
de los que el superior es más pronunciado
y el inferior constituye el borde externo
del canal sifonal, que es corto y abierto.
Coloración de la concha blanco ama-
rillenta con líneas espirales rojizas. En
algunas conchas estas líneas coinciden
con los cordones espirales mientras que
en otras coinciden con los interespacios.
Las suturas, la base de la concha y el
canal sifonal suelen ser también rojizos.
La protoconcha es de color blanco.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 8,4 mm;
paratipo con una altura de 7,8 mm.
Animal: Desconocido.
Distribución : Sólo conocida por ejem-
plares procedentes del Sahara.
Comentarios : Por la escultura de su pro-
toconcha se aproximaría a Chauvetia reti-
fera (Brugnone, 1880), C. tenuisculpta Daut-
zenberg, 1912 o C. multilirata Oliver y
Rolán, 2008, pero las dos primeras son de
mayor tamaño, presentan tres cordones
espirales en la primera vuelta y la anchura
de sus cordones es claramente más ancha
que sus interespacios. Además C. retifera
tiene color marrón rojizo y C. tenuisculpta
es blanca. En cuanto a la protoconcha en
C. tenuisculpta sus costillas se inician ya
en el núcleo.
El único ejemplar de C. multilirata
estudiado era de color blanco sucio, pre-
sentaba también los cordones espirales
más anchos que sus interespacios, así
como sus costillas y su protoconcha
tenía las costillas menos pronunciadas.
Otra especie presente en Senegal, C.
luciacuestae Oliver y Rolán, 2008,
también guarda cierto parecido si bien
la coloración rojiza de esta última afecta
únicamente a los nodulos. La protocon-
cha las diferencia claramente ya que C.
luciacuestae carece de costillas axiales en
casi su mayor parte.
Chauvetia peculiaris spec. nov. (Figs. 53, 54, 131-137)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Fig. 53-54, 132) en MNCN (15.05/51086). Paratipos, todos de Sahara Occi-
dental: MNHN (1 c) 23° 65' N, 15° 25' W; MHNS (1 c) (Fig 131) 23° 09' N, 16° 25' W; CHO (1 c) 23°
09' N, 16° 25' (1 c) 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W; CPR (1 ej) recolectada por pescadores.
Localidad tipo: Sahara, 22° 00' N, 17° 22' W, 46 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico hace alusión al carácter poco común de los cordones espirales
más anchos de la protoconcha.
144
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 138-143. Chauvetia edentula spec. nov. 138: holotipo, 6,3 mm, 22° 03’ N, 17° 11’ W, 77
m, Sahara (MNCN); 139: detalle de la abertura; 140, 1 4 1 : protoconcha, Arguineguín, Gran
Canaria, 377 m; 142: detalle de la protoconcha; 143: detalle de la escultura.
Figures 138-143. Chauvetia edentula spec. nov. 138: holotype, 6.3 mm, 22° 05’ N, 17° ll’W, 77 m,
Sahara (MNCN); 139: detail ofthe aperture; 140, 141: protoconch, Arguineguín, Gran Canaria, 377
m; 142: detail of the protoconch; 143: detail ofthe sculpture.
145
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 53, 54, 131,
132) fusiforme-alargada, sólida, con
unas seis vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 133, 134) con una
vuelta, y con una anchura de unas 570
pm (núcleo: 330 jum, primera media
vuelta: 530 jum) y unas 630 pm de altura.
Escultura basada en unos 16-18 cordonci-
llos espirales, de anchura similar a los
interespacios (Fig. 135). Las costillas de la
protoconcha se inician a partir del núcleo
y en un número entre 20 y 25 cruzan los
cordones dándole un aspecto reticulado.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de cor-
dones espirales de anchura similar o algo
menor que sus interespacios (Fig. 136).
Costillas algo más estrechas que sus inte-
respacios. En el inicio de la teleoconcha
aparecen cinco cordones espirales siendo
el superior el reborde de la espira. En la
última vuelta se mantienen estos cinco cor-
dones por encima de la inserción labial.
En la base hay una decena de cordonci-
llos más estrechos. La escultura axial está
formada por costillas convexas algo pro-
soclinas, una docena en la última vuelta
que se prolongan por debajo de la inser-
ción labial. La ultima vuelta ocupa el 60
% de la altura total de la concha.
Abertura oval que alcanza el 40% de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo se aprecian unos dientes
constituyendo el inferior el borde externo
del canal sifonal que, aunque es muy
corto es claro, debido al estrechamiento
de la parte inferior del margen externo
del canal sifonal y a la presencia de una
escotadura en la base del labio externo.
El color de las escasas conchas estu-
diadas era crema con una banda algo
más oscura a la altura de la inserción
labial y una base con el canal sifonal
blanco.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 7,7 x 3,4 mm;
paratipos de unas dimensiones similares.
Animal: Desconocido. Opérculo (Fig.
137) ovoide con el núcleo subterminal.
Distribución: La especie solo se ha
localizado en las costas del Sahara.
Comentarios: El tipo de protoconcha
con costillas axiales en toda su extensión
la relaciona con el grupo de C. javieri.
Se diferencia de esta especie por
tener en la teleoconcha unas costillas
más pronunciadas, un canal sifonal más
claro y menos cordones espirales (en la
última vuelta hay cinco cordones de
anchura similar a los interespacios por
encima de la inserción labial mientras
que en C. javieri suele haber seis o siete,
que además tienen una anchura clara-
mente superior a sus interespacios). En
cuanto a la protoconcha, la de C. javieri
es más alta y presenta más costillitas
axiales (más de 30 vs. unas 24), teniendo
además más cordoncillos espirales.
De Chauvetia distans spec. nov. y de
C. hernandezi spec. nov. se distingue por
el tipo de protoconcha ya que en ellas
no hay escultura axial en toda su exten-
sión.
De Chauvetia megastoma spec. nov. se
distingue por tener menos cordones
espirales, un canal sifonal más marcado
y por la diferente escultura de su proto-
concha.
Chauvetia edentula spec. nov. (Figs. 55-59, 138-143)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 55-57, 138, 139) en MNCN (15.05/51087) (Figs. 138-140). Paratipos:
MNHN (1), MHNS (1), BMNH (1), CPR (1), CHO (6 c, 4 j, Figs. 58, 59). Todos de Arguineguín, N
de Gran Canaria, 377 m.
Localidad tipo: Sahara Occidental, 22° 05' N, 17° ÍY W, 77 m.
Etimología: El nombre específico alude a la ausencia de dientes en la abertura, pese a que el labio
se encuentra bien desarrollado.
Descripción: Concha (Figs. 55-59, 138)
fusiforme-alargada sólida, con unas seis
vueltas de espira.
Protoconcha (Figs. 140, 141) con una
vuelta, y con una anchura de unos 720
pm (núcleo: 350 jum, primera media
vuelta: 550 jum) y unas 750 pm de altura.
Escultura (Fig. 142) formada por unas 26
costillas axiales que comienzan a partir
del núcleo y son cruzadas por muchos
146
OLIVER Y ROLÁN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 144-149. Chauvetia borgesi spec. nov.; material de Canarias: 144, 145: paratipos, 6,3 mm,
Sardina, Gran Canaria (MHNS); 7,1 mm, Gando, Gran Canaria (MHNS); 146, 147: protocon-
cha; 148, 149: detalle de la abertura.
Figures 144-149. Chauvetia borgesi spec. nov.; material from Canaries: 144, 145: paratypes, 6.3 mm.
Sardina, Gran Canaria (MHNS); 7.1 mm, Gando, Gran Canaria (MHNS); 146, 147: protoconch;
148, 149: detail ofthe aperture.
147
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
cordoncillos espirales de anchura desi-
gual, al igual que sus interespacios,
menos definidas que en otras especies,
pero muy numerosos, pudiendo llegar a
ser 40 o más. Entre las costillas es donde
se aprecia mejor la escultura espiral.
Teleoconcha con vueltas convexas y
sutura profunda. Escultura (Fig. 143) de
cordones espirales de anchura similar o
algo menor que sus interespacios al igual
que las costillas. En el inicio de la teleo-
concha aparecen seis cordones espirales
siendo el superior sólo el reborde supe-
rior de la espira y no se separa hasta la
tercera vuelta. En la última vuelta hay
seis cordones por encima de la inserción
labial y, hacia la base, aparece una quin-
cena de cordoncillos más, separados por
interespacios claros. La escultura axial
está formada por costillas convexas orto-
clinas o muy poco prosoclinas, una
decena en la última vuelta que apenas se
prolongan por debajo de la inserción
labial. La ultima vuelta ocupa el 57% de
la altura total de la concha. Abertura
oval-redondeada que alcanza el 37% de
la altura de la concha. En el interior del
labio externo no se aprecia en las conchas
estudiadas dientes (Fig. 139) salvo en la
parte inferior, en lo que podríamos consi-
derar como el borde externo del canal
sifonal, que aunque corto es claro.
Coloración de la concha suele ser
amarillenta con la base algo mas oscura.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 6,3 x 3,1 mm;
paratipos algo más pequeños.
Animal: Desconocido.
Distribución : La especie estaría pre-
sente en el Sahara y en Canarias, siendo
una especie de más profundidad que la
mayoría de las especies de Chauvetia.
Comentarios : La forma y escultura de
la protoconcha la relacionaría con el
grupo de C. javieri. Pero no se trata de
una mera variedad de aguas profundas
sino de una especie con entidad propia.
La curvatura regular de las vueltas,
su sutura profunda y su canal sifonal
claro son caracteres que no se dan juntos
en otras especies del grupo. Así C. javieri
no tiene las vueltas tan convexas ni un
canal sifonal claro, además de tener los
cordones espirales más anchos que los
interespacios. C. peculiaris spec. nov.
tiene menos cordones espirales en la
teleoconcha (cinco en la última vuelta
por encima de la inserción labial) y su
canal sifonal es más corto.
Chauvetia horgesi spec. nov. (Figs. 60-65, 144-155)
Material tipo: Holotipo (Figs. 60, 61) en MNCN (15.05/ 51088). Paratipos en las siguientes colecciones:
MNHN (1) (Figs. 62, 63), de la localidad tipo; BMNH (1), Fuerteventura, 10 m; MHNS (5): 1 c. Gando,
Gran Canaria (Fig. 145); 1 c. Sardina, Gran Canaria (Fig. 144); 1 c. Arrecife, Lanzarote: 2 c, Sahara
Occidental, 23° 15' N, 16° 40' W, y 22° 05' N, 16° 58' W) (Fig. 150, 151); CPR (1) Sahara Occidental, 23°
15' N, 16° 40' W; CHO (11: 8 c. Sardina, 15 m; 1 c. Bañaderos, Gran Canaria; 1 c, Roques de Taliarte, 23
m; 1 c, Arinaga); CPB (24 ej y c: Punta Teño, Tenerife); CFS (1) Arrecife, Lanzarote.
Material estudiado: CANARIAS: Gran Canaria: 1 c, Playa Honda (CFS); 1 j, Arguineguín (CHO); 1 j.
Playa del Hombre, 80 m (CFS); 1 c, 3j, NO Gran Canaria (CHO); 11c, Arinaga, SW Gran Canaria, 5 m
(CFS); 2 c. Sardina, 15 m (CHO); 1 ej, 3 c. Sardina, 17 m (CHO); 1 c, C0005 (CHO); 2 j. Gando 8-24383,
12 m (CHO); 1 j. Caleta Abajo (CHO); 2 j, C0020a (CHO); 5 j, NO Gran Canaria, 100 m (CFS); 2 j, RH-
1/30008, 85 m (CHO); 2 j; El Cabrón (CFS); 2 c, lote 275, C0025 (CHO); 3 c, C0001 (CHO); 1 c, C0022
(CHO); 1 j, FH89 (CHO); 1 c, 1 j. Las Burras (CFS); 1 j, FH67 (CHO). Fuerteventura: 1 c. Granillo
(CHO); 1 j, Taliarte, 200 m (CFS); lj; Las Salinas, 40 m (CFS). Lanzarote: 2 j. Playa Honda (CFS); 1 c, Playa
Honda, Arrecife (CHO); 3 ej, C0005 (CHO); 2c, C0005 (CHO); 1 c, C0014 (CHO). Tenerife: 10 j. Punta
Teño (CPB). SAHARA: 1 c, lote 201, 22° 05' N, 16° 58' W (CHO); 1 j, lote 208, 22° 35' N, 16° 58' W
(CHO); 1 c, lote 212, 23° 15' N, 16° 90' W (CHO). MAURITANIA: 1 j, MM1730 (CHO).
Localidad tipo: Gando, Canarias, 6 m.
Etimología: La especie se dedica a José Pedro Borges, malacólogo portugués que colaboró con la
aportación de material de Canarias y de otras zonas próximas.
Descripción : Concha (Figs. 6Q-.65, 144, unas seis vueltas de espira. Protoconcha
145, 150, 151) fusiforme, sólida, con (Figs. 146, 147, 152, 153) con 0,75
148
OLI VER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 150-155. Chauvetia borgesi spec. nov.; material de Sahara; 150, 151: paratipos, 5,9 mm,
23° 15’ N, 16° 40’ W, Sahara (MHNS); 5,1 mm 22° 05’ N, 16° 58’ W, Sahara (MHNS); 152,
153: protoconchas; 154, 155: microescultura de la protoconcha.
Figures 150-155. Chauvetia borgesi spec. nov.; material from Sahara; 150, 151: paratypes, 5.9 mm,
23° 15’ N, 16° 40 ’ W, Sahara (MHNS); 5. 1 mm 22 0 05’ N, 16° 58’ W, Sahara (MHNS); 152, 153:
protoconchs; 154, 155: microsculpture ofthe protoconch.
149
Iberas, 27 (2), 2009
vueltas, y con una anchura de unas 700
¡um (núcleo: 380 jum, primera media
vuelta: 600 jum) y unas 700 pm de altura.
Escultura (Figs. 154, 155) formada por
unos 15 cordoncillos espirales cruzados
por unas 18 costillas que se inician a
partir del mismo núcleo y que son más
estrechas que sus intervalos.
Teleoconcha con una escultura de
cordones espirales de anchura parecida
(aunque los superiores son algo más
estrechos) y claramente más anchos que
sus interespacios. Las costillas pueden
ser de anchura similar a los interespa-
cios, algo más estrechas o algo más
gruesas en cuyo caso la escultura axial
es más prominente. En el inicio de la
teleoconcha aparecen cinco cordones
espirales siendo el superior el reborde
de la espira. En la última vuelta hay seis
cordones por encima de la inserción
labial de los que los dos superiores son
de menor anchura y suelen aparecer
juntos. Hacia la base, aparecen de una
docena de cordoncillos más. La escul-
tura axial está formada por costillas con-
vexas algo prosoclinas (algunas leve-
mente sigmoideas), una decena en la
última vuelta que apenas se prolongan
por debajo de la inserción labial. La
ultima vuelta ocupa el 60 % de la altura
total de la concha.
Abertura (Figs. 148, 149) oval que
alcanza el 41% de la altura de la concha.
En el interior del labio externo se apre-
cian siete u ocho dientes constituyendo
el inferior el borde externo del canal
sifonal, que es corto y bastante abierto.
Coloración de la concha: Puede ser
marrón oscuro o amarillenta. En
algunas conchas de color marrón oscuro
puede aparecer una banda blanca sub-
sutural que afecta a los dos o tres cordo-
nes espirales superiores.
Dimensiones: Holotipo 7,0 x 3,4 mm;
paratipos de unas dimensiones simila-
COMENTARIOS FINALES
Otros taxones mencionados para
Canarias:
Chauvetia candidissima canarica Nord-
sieck y García-Talavera, 1979' (Fig. 66).
res, alguno ligeramente mayor, de hasta
unos 8 mm.
Animal (Figs. 158, 159): Color crema
anaranjado con puntos amarillentos;
sifón grisáceo.
Distribución : La especie está presente
en Canarias y en las costas del Sahara
Occidental y Mauritania.
Comentarios: Por su protoconcha,
esta especie estaría relacionada con las
del grupo de C. javieri. Se diferenciaría
de C. javieri por tener una escultura más
marcada, menos cordones espirales, por
su aspecto más rechoncho y por presen-
tar menos dientes en la abertura.
Además la protoconcha de C. borgesi
spec. nov. presenta menos costillas que
más voluminosas que las de C. javieri.
De Chauvetia peculiaris spec. nov. y de
Chauvetia edentula spec. nov, especies
que también presentan protoconcha del
mismo estilo, se distingue por no tener
tan definido el canal sifonal.
Sin embargo la especie más parecida,
y con la que puede originar confusión su
diferenciación, debido tanto a su aspecto
general y color, a su abundancia y a que
comparten área de distribución es C.
crassior. La diferencia determinante es la
escultura de su protoconcha ya que C.
crassior no presenta costillas en la parte
inicial de la misma. Si una concha carece
de protoconcha puede resultar difícil de
determinar su identidad, si bien la aber-
tura de C. crassior suele ser más cua-
drada que la de C. borgesi y su concha
presenta menos cordones espirales.
Aunque se ha apreciado en el mate-
rial estudiado que la protoconcha de los
ejemplares de Canarias tiene menos cos-
tillas que los del Sahara y que la teleo-
concha presenta menos cordones por
encima de la inserción labial (cinco
frente a seis) no parecen diferencias
importantes y se consideran dentro de
la variabilidad intraespecífica.
En el trabajo de descripción aparecen
mencionadas unas dimensiones de 7 x
3,5 mm para esta especie. Localidad: La
Gomera. El lote de tipos está formado
150
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
Figuras 156-163. Partes blandas de especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Punta Teño, Tenerife
(CPB). 156, 157. Chauvetia crassior. 158, 159. Chauvetia borgesi. 160, 161: Chauvetia cf. affinis ;
162, 163: Chauvetia affinis.
Figures 156-163. Soft parís of Chauvetia species ftom Canarias, Punta Teño, Tenerife (CPB). 156,
157: Chauvetia crassior. 158, 159: Chauvetia borgesi. 160, 161: Chauvetia cf. affinis; 162, 163:
Chauvetia affinis.
151
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
por dos conchas aparentemente diferen-
tes, una de ellas muy erosionada, tanto
la concha como la protoconcha y sólo se
puede apreciar el patrón de color a
bandas. La otra, que se corresponde con
la figura representada en la descripción
original, tienen una altura de 5,5 mm, la
protoconcha está desaparecida. Por la
falta de datos es imposible definir la
especie, hasta que se pueda estudiar
más material de la localidad tipo, pero
parece distinta a cualquiera de las que
están representadas en nuestro material.
Chauvetia elongata Nordsieck y
García-Talavera, 1979 (Fig. 67). Este
taxon aparece en el trabajo de descrip-
ción original con unas dimensiones de
10 x 3,5 mm, y su procedencia del Sur
de Gran Canaria. El holotipo existente
en el MNHC tiene una máxima dimen-
sión de 8,8 mm, y la protoconcha está
fuertemente erosionada, por lo que no
se puede hacer la comparación con
Chauvetia lefebvrii y C. retifera, que son
las especies con las que tiene un mayor
parecido morfológico. En cualquier
caso, después del examen de grandes
cantidades de material procedente de
Canarias se puede afirmar que estas dos
especies no parecen estar presentes en
las islas por lo que es posible que este
holotipo proceda de material introdu-
cido por barcos de pesca.
De las nuevas especies recuerda leja-
namente a C. austera spec. nov., pero en
esta última las vueltas son más conve-
xas, los cordoncillos espirales tienen
interespacios más anchos, y el número
de estos cordoncillos en la última vuelta
es menor.
Por otra parte, existe un taxon con el
nombre: Donovania mamillata var. elon-
gata Locard y Caziot, 1900 pero se trata
de un nomen nudum.
Distribución de las especies estu-
diadas
En el presente trabajo, que com-
prende las áreas de Canarias, Maurita-
nia y Sahara, se han estudiado 18 espe-
cies, de las cuales ya tenían nombre 9 de
ellas, mientras que otras 9 han sido
ahora descritas como nuevas, recibiendo
el correspondiente nombre.
El área de distribución de las especies
ha sido muy variable. Cinco de estas es-
pecies ya eran conocidas del trabajo ante-
rior, que había sido centrado sobre la
zona de Dakar, Senegal. Alguna de ellas,
como C. tenebrosa, era más abundante en
Senegal, aunque su área se extiende
ahora hasta Mauritania. Otro tanto cabe
decir de C. lamyi y C. javieri, pero en estas
últimas, la zona de mayor densidad de
población es el Sahara. C. joani parece dis-
tribuirse tanto por Senegal como por
Mauritania. Caso especial ha sido C.
errata spec. nov. que, pese a su mayor
abundancia en Senegal, en el trabajo an-
terior se la consideró como una especie
ya descrita perteneciente a un determi-
nado taxon, mientras en el presente tra-
bajo, después de precisar más su estudio,
se le da nombre como especie nueva.
Las especies que se han encontrado
con una mayor incidencia en las Islas
Canarias han sido: C. affinis, muy abun-
dante (también presente en Sahara y
norte de Marruecos); C. crassior, también
muy abundante y encontrada también
en el Sahara y del Sur de la Península
Ibérica (aunque esta población es algo
distinta morfológicamente). En cambio
C. procerula y C. mamillata, han apare-
cido en escasa cantidad, y su área de
distribución se extiende al Mediterrá-
neo. Finalmente, dos de las especies
nuevas, C. edentula y C. borgesi, se han
encontrado en Canarias, no en gran
abundancia y comparten área de distri-
bución con Sahara.
El Sahara parece ser el área en la que
existe una mayor número de especies:
13. Además de las ya mencionadas C.
mamillata, C. affinis, C. crassior, C. lamyi,
C. javieri, C. edentula spec. nov. y C.
borgesi spec. nov., se han encontrado las
siguientes: C. lefebvrii, que también se
encuentra en el Atlántico de la Penín-
sula Ibérica y en el Mediterráneo; C. her-
nandezi spec. nov. y C. distans spec. nov.
que también se han encontrado en Mau-
ritania, aunque en mucha menor canti-
dad; C. gigantissima spec. nov., C. austera
spec. nov. y C. peculiaris spec. nov. apa-
recen como exclusivas de esta zona.
Mauritania tiene nueve especies, casi
siempre compartidas con el Sahara (C.
152
OLIVER Y RoláN: Las especies de Chauvetia de Canarias, Mauritania y Sahara
hernandezi spec. nov., C. distans spec.
nov.; o con el Sahara y Senegal: C. javieri
y C. lamyi. Con Canarias y Sahara: C.
borgesi spec. nov. Con Senegal comparte:
C. joani, C. tenebrosa, y C. errata spec.
nov. La única especie que sólo se ha
encontrado en estas costas ha sido C.
megastoma spec. nov.
Morfología de las conchas: algunas
conchas tienen un evidente parecido
pudiendo agruparse con las que le son
más próximas. Algunos caracteres de la
protoconcha parecen importantes en la
diferenciación:
Es evidente que se pueden formar
algunos grupos en base a la escultura
axial de la protoconcha:
1- con costillas axiales bien diferen-
ciadas y separadas, y casi sin escultura
espiral: C. tenuisculpta.
2- con costillas axiales en la proto-
concha pero muy próximas y numero-
sas, y escultura espiral clara: C. javieri,
C. megastoma, C. austera, C. peculiaris, C.
edentula.
3- sin costillas axiales en la mayor
parte de la protoconcha, aunque están
presentes en el final: a este grupo perte-
necen la mayoría de las especies conoci-
das del género.
En las conchas que no tienen escul-
tura axial en la protoconcha y en cambio
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
Ardovini R. 2008. Description of a new species
belonging to Genus Chauvetia Monterosato,
1884 (Gastropoda: Buccinidae), from West
Africa (Senegal). Malacologia Mostra mondiale,
60: 3-5; erratum, 61: 27.
Dance S.P. 1986. A history of the shell collec-
ting. E. J. Brill - Dr. W Backhuys, Leiden.
265 pp, 32 pls.
Dautzenberg P. 1910. Contribution á la faune
malacologique de LAfrique occidentale. Actes
de la Societé Linnéenne de Bordeaux, 64: 1 - 174,
pls. .1-4.
Deshayes G.P. 1835. Mollusques. Expédition
Scientifique de Morée entreprise et publiée par
ordre du Gouvernement Frangais. Travaux de
la Section des Sciences Physiques sous la Di-
rection de M. le Colonel Bory de Saint Vicent.
Tome III. I partie. Zoologie. Pp 81-205, pls.
18-26.
tienen escultura espiral fina las hay que
presentan:
1- apenas hay escultura axial: C.
gigantea, C. multilirata,
2- hay escultura axial pero muy poco
definida: C. tenebrosa, C. pelorcei, C.
robustalba,
3- hay excavaciones muy regular-
mente dispuestas entre los cordoncillos
espirales: la mayoría de las restantes
especies.
AGRADECIMIENTOS
Los autores agradecen a las numero-
sas personas e instituciones que cedie-
ron material en préstamo para el pre-
sente estudio: MNHN, MNHC, MHNS,
José Pedro Borges, Winfried Engl, Peter
Ryall, Frank Swinnen, y a José María
Hernández (t) y a sus herederos. Asi-
mismo agradecemos a Karin Sindemark
(SMNH, Estocolmo) la información
acerca del holotipo de Chauvetia crassior
y a Purba Pal (SMNH) la fotografía de
las Figuras 19 y 20.
Jesús Méndez e Inés Pazos hicieron
las fotografías al microscopio electrónico
de barrido en el Centro de Apoyo Cientí-
fico y Tecnológico a la Investigación
(CACTI) de la Universidad de Vigo.
Fretter V. y Graham A. 1984. Prosobranch
Molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 8. Ne-
ogastropoda. Journal of Molluscan Studies.
London, Supplement 15: 435-556.
Hergueta H., Luque A. y Templado J. 2002.
On the taxonomy and biology of Chauvetia
mamillata (Risso, 1826) (Gastropoda: Bucci-
nidae) in south East Spain. Bollettino Mala-
cologico. Supplemento 4.135-146.
Micali P. 1999 "1998". Note sulle specie di
Chauvetia dell' Atlántico nord-orientale. Bo-
llettino Malacologico, 34(5-8): 53-68.
Mifsud C. 1994. Alcuni molluschi vivi dalle ac-
que di Malta. La Conchiglia, 26 (272): 29-36.
Monterosato T. di M. 1889. Coquilles mari-
nes Marocaines. Journal de Conchyliologie, 37:
20-40, 112-121.
Nordsieck F. 1976. Famiglia Buccinidae. II ge-
nere Chauvetia Monterosato nei mari d' Eu-
ropa. La Conchiglia, 8 (89-90): 3-7.
153
Iberus, 27 (2), 2009
Nordsieck F. y García-Tal aver a F., 1979.
Moluscos marinos de Canarias y Madera (Gas-
tro-poda). Aula de Cultura de Tenerife. 208
pp, 46 pls.
Odhner N.H. 1932. Beitrage zur Malakozoo-
logie der Kanarischen Inseln. Lamellibran-
chien, Cephalopoden, Gastropoden. Arkiv
fór Zoologi, Stokholm, 23A (14): 1-116.
Oliver J.D. y Rolán E. 2008. Las especies del
género Chauvetia (Gastropoda, Neogastro-
poda)del área de Dakar, Senegal, África Oc-
cidental, con la descripción de diez especies
nuevas. Iberus, 26 (2): 133-175.
Risso A. 1826. Histoire naturelle des principales pro-
ductions de l'Europe Méridionale et particulié-
rement de celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes-
Maritimes. Mollusques. Levrault, F. G., Paris,
4: 1-439, 12 pls.
Sabelli B., Giannuzzi-Savelli R. y Bedulli
D. 1991. Catalogo annotato dei molluschi marini
del Mediterráneo. Vol. 1. Librería Naturalistica
Bolognese, Bologna, 348 pp.
FÉ DE ERRATAS DEL TRABAJO ANTERIOR
Oliver y Rolán (2008). Las especies del género Chauvetia (Gastropoda, Neogastro-
poda) del área de Dakar, Senegal, África occidental, con la descripción de diez espe-
cies nuevas. Iberus, 26 (2): 133-175
En este trabajo, una especie cambió de consideración en el curso del mismo, pero
en algunos lugares quedó con el nombre anterior, por lo que se indican aquí esos
errores para su corrección.
Pag. 168 2a columna línea 4
Pag. 170 2a columna línea 6
Pag. 170 2a columna línea 9
Pag. 174 Ia columna línea 14
Pag. 174 Ia columna línea 24
Dice en todas C. candidissima y debería decir C. gigantea
154
NORMAS DE PUBLICACION
• La revista Iberus publica artículos de fondo, notas y monografías que versen sobre cualquiera de los aspectos
relacionados con la Malacología. Se entiende por artículo un trabajo de investigación de más de 5 páginas de
texto, incluidas láminas, gráficos y tablas. Las notas son trabajos de menor extensión. Las monografías son tra-
bajos sobre un tema único, de extensión superior a las 50 páginas de la revista y que serán publicadas, si
procede, como un suplemento de Iberus. Los autores interesados en publicar monografías deberán ponerse
previamente en contacto con el Editor de Publicaciones. Se entiende que el contenido de los manuscritos no ha
sido publicado, ni enviado simultáneamente a otra revista para su consideración.
• Los manuscritos, así como toda la correspondencia relacionada con los mismos, deberán ser remitidos a:
Serge Gofas, Editor de Publicaciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de
Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga, España y /o al correo electrónico <sgofas@uma.es>.
• El texto del trabajo podrá estar redactado en español, inglés, italiano, francés o portugués.
• Los artículos, notas y monografías deberán presentarse sobre DIN A-4, por una sola cara a doble espacio
(incluyendo referencias, pies de figura y tablas), con al menos 3 centímetros de margen por cada lado. Los tra-
bajos se entregarán por triplicado (original y dos copias) y se incluirá una versión en un CD, o bien remitida
por correo electrónico, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones de corrientes de Windows (pero no
en el formato .docx de Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macintosh. En caso de autoría compartida,
uno de los autores deberá hacerse responsable de toda la correspondencia.
• Junto con el trabajo debe incluirse una lista de al menos 4 posibles revisores del mismo, sin perjuicio de los
que el propio Editor considere oportunos.
• Los manuscritos se presentarán de acuerdo al siguiente esquema:
Primera página. Deberá incluir un título conciso, pero sugerente del contenido del trabajo, así como una traduc-
ción al inglés del mismo (si el artículo no está escrito en inglés). Cuando sea preciso, deberá incluir referencia a
familia o taxones superiores. A continuación figurarán, por este orden, el nombre y apellidos completos del
autor o autores, las direcciones completas de los mismos, y un resumen del trabajo y su traducción al inglés.
Dicho resumen deberá sintetizar, en conjunción con el título, tanto los resultados como las conclusiones del
artículo; se sugiere una extensión de 100 a 200 palabras.
Páginas siguientes. Incluirán el resto del artículo, que debe dividirse en secciones precedidas por breves encabe-
zamientos. Siempre que sea posible, se recomienda seguir el siguiente esquema: Introducción, Material y
métodos. Resultados, Discusión, Conclusiones, Agradecimientos y Bibliografía. Si se emplean abreviaturas no
habituales en el texto, deberán indicarse tras el apartado de Material y Métodos.
• Las notas breves deberán presentarse de la misma forma, pero sin resumen.
• Deberán evitarse notas a pie de página y referencias cruzadas. Deberán respetarse estrictamente los Códigos
Internacionales de Nomenclatura Zoológica y Botánica (últimas ediciones). Cuando un taxón aparezca por
primera vez deberá citarse su autor y fecha de su descripción. En el caso de artículos sistemáticos, cuando se
den las sinonimias de los taxones, éstas deberán citarse COMPLETAS, incluyendo en forma abreviada la
publicación donde fueron descritas, y la localidad tipo si es conocida entre corchetes, según el siguiente
esquema (préstese especial cuidado a la puntuación):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Sinonimias
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Localidad tipo: Marsella].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
Dichas referencias no deberán incluirse en la lista de Bibliografía si es la única vez que se nombran en el texto.
Si se incluyen una lista completa de referencias de un taxón inmediatamente tras éste, deberá seguirse el
mismo esquema (sin incluir en Bibliografía las referencias que no se mencionen en otro lugar del texto).
• Sólo los nombres en latín y los de taxones genéricos y específicos deberán llevar subrayado sencillo o prefe-
rentemente ir en cursiva. En ningún caso deberá escribirse una palabra totalmente en letras mayúsculas, ni
siquiera el Título. Las unidades a utilizar deberán pertenecer al Sistema Métrico Decimal, junto con sus correc-
tas abreviaturas. En artículos escritos en castellano, en los números decimales sepárese la parte entera de la
decimal por una coma inferior (,), NUNCA por un punto (.) o coma superior (')•
• Las referencias bibliográficas irán en el texto con minúsculas o versalitas: Fretter y Graham (1962) o Fretter
y Graham (1962). Si son más de dos autores se deberán citar todos la primera vez que aparecen en el texto
[Smith, Jones y Brown (1970)] empleándose et al. las siguientes veces [Smith et al. (1970)]. Si un autor ha publi-
cado más de un trabajo en un año se citarán con letras: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). No deberá emplearse op.
cit. La lista de referencias deberá incluir todas las citas del texto y sólo éstas, ordenadas alfabéticamente. Se
citarán los nombres de todos los autores de cada referencia, sea cual sea su número. Los nombres de los
autores deberán escribirse, en letras minúsculas o Versalitas. No deberán incluirse referencias a autores
cuando éstos aparezcan en el texto exclusivamente como autoridades de un taxón. Los nombres de las publica-
ciones periódicas deberán aparecer COMPLETOS, no abreviados. Cuando se citen libros, dése el título, editor,
lugar de publicación, n° de edición si no es la primera y número total de páginas. Deberán evitarse referencias
a Tesis Doctorales u otros documentos inéditos de difícil consulta. Síganse los siguientes ejemplos (préstese
atención a la puntuación):
Fretter V. y Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. En Ponder, W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Las gráficas e ilustraciones deberán ser originales y presentarse preferentemente en formato electrónico al
formato de caja de la revista o proporcional a éste. Este formato es de 57 mm (una columna) o 121 mm (dos) de
anchura y hasta 196 mm de altura, si bien se recomienda utilizar el formato a dos columnas. Es importante que
todas las figuras sean remitidas en su formato original (por ejemplo, las fotografías en .jpg de alta calidad o .tif,
las gráficas en hojas de cálculo Excel o documentos de CorelDraw), puesto que las ilustraciones insertadas en
el manuscrito WORD son inservibles en la fase de imprenta. Las imágenes digitales deben ser formateadas en
su tamaño de impresión con una resolución mínima de 300 ppp para imágenes en color o escala de grises y de
600 ppp para las de blanco y negro. Considérese la reducción que será necesaria a la hora de decidir el tamaño
de las escalas o letras en las figuras, que no deberán bajar de los 2 mm. En figuras compuestas, cada parte
deberá etiquetarse con letras mayúsculas, el resto de las letras deberán ser minúsculas. Las escalas de dibujos y
fotografías deberán ser gráficas, utilizando unidades del sistema métrico decimal; no deberán hacerse referen-
cias a los aumentos de una determinada ilustración, ya que éstos cambian con la reducción. En su caso, se
recomienda la utilización de mapas con proyección UTM. Cada figura, gráfica o ilustración deberá presentarse
en hojas separadas y con numeración arábiga (1, 2, 3,...), sin separar "Figuras" y "Láminas". Los pies de
figura, en una hoja aparte, deberán acompañarse de su traducción al inglés (o español si el inglés es la lengua
del trabajo). Utilícese el esquema siguiente:
Figura 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal desplazándose; B: detalle de un rinóforo; C: branquia.
Las abreviaturas empleadas en las ilustraciones deberán incluirse en los pies de figura.
Los autores interesados en incluir láminas en color deberán consultar con el editor y sufragar el sobrecoste con
una contribución de 30 € por página. Por lo demás, deberán ajustarse a los mismos requisitos indicados para
las figuras.
Si se pretende enviar gráficas o ilustraciones en impresión de papel es imprescindible presentar originales de
buena calidad. Las imágenes en semitonos deben estar bien contrastadas y ajustarse al tamaño definitivo de
impresión; al componer fotografías sobre una hoja, procúrese que los espacios entre ellas sean regulares y que
estén debidamente alineadas. Téngase en cuenta que incluir fotografías de distinto contraste en una misma
página conlleva una pobre reproducción final. Las gráficas de ordenador deberán imprimirse con impresora
láser sobre papel de buena calidad.
• Las Tablas se presentarán en hojas separadas, siempre con numeración romana (I, II, III,...). Las leyendas se
incluirán en una hoja aparte acompañándose de una traducción al inglés. Deberán evitarse las tablas particu-
larmente complejas. Se recomienda reducir el número y extensión de ilustraciones, láminas o tablas al mínimo
necesario.
• Los artículos que no se ajusten a las normas de publicación serán devueltos al autor con las indicaciones de
los cambios necesarios.
• El Comité Editorial comunicará al autor responsable del trabajo la fecha de recepción del trabajo y la fecha
de envío a revisión. Cada original recibido será sometido a revisión por al menos dos investigadores. El
Comité Editorial, a la vista de los informes de los revisores decidirá sobre la aceptación o no de cada manus-
crito. El autor recibirá en cada caso copia de los comentarios de los revisores sobre su artículo. En caso de
aceptación, el mismo Comité Editorial, si lo considera conveniente, podrá solicitar a los autores otras modifica-
ciones que considere oportunas. Si el trabajo es aceptado, el autor deberá enviar una copia impresa del mismo
corregida, acompañada por una versión en un CD, utilizando procesadores de texto en sus versiones corrien-
tes de Windows (pero no el formato .docx generado por Word 2007, el habitual de Windows Vista) o Macin-
tosh. La fecha de aceptación figurará en el artículo publicado.
• Las pruebas de imprenta serán enviadas por correo electrónico al autor responsable, exclusivamente para la
corrección de erratas, y deberán ser devueltas en un plazo máximo de una semana. Se recomienda prestar
especial atención en la corrección de las pruebas.
• De cada trabajo se entregarán gratuitamente 50 separatas, además de una versión electrónica en formato
.pdf. Aquellos autores que deseen un número mayor, deberán hacerlo constar al devolver las pruebas de
imprenta, y nunca posteriormente. El coste de las separatas adicionales será cargado al autor.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
• Iberus publishes research papers, notes and monographs devoted to the various aspects of Malacology.
Papers are manuscripts of more than 5 typed pages, including figures and tables. Notes are shorter papers.
Monographs should exceed 50 pages of the final periodical, and may be published as Supplements. Authors
wishing to publish monographs should contact the Editor. Manuscripts are considered on the understanding
that their contents have not been published or simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere.
• Manuscripts and correspondence regarding editorial matters must be sent to: Serge Gofas, Editor de Publica-
ciones, Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, s/n, 29071, Málaga,
Spain and/ or to the e-mail <sgofas@uma.es>.
• Manuscripts may be written in Spanish, English, Italian, French or Portuguese.
• Manuscripts must be typed double spaced (including the references, figure captions and tables) on one side
on A-4 (297x210 mm) with margins of at least 3 cm. An original and two copies must be submitted, together
with a CD or e-mail remittance containing the article written with a current Windows (but not .docx format
generated by Word 2007, mainly used with Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. When a paper has
joint authorship, one author must accept responsibility for all correspondence.
• The authors must inelude a list of at least 4 possible referees; the Editor can choose any others if appropriate.
• Papers should conform the following layout:
First page. This must inelude a concise but informative title, with mention of family of higher taxon when
appropriate, and its Spanish translation. It will be followed by all authors' ñames and surnames, their full
address(es), an abstract (and its Spanish translation) not exceeding 200 words which summarizes not only con-
tents but results and conclusions.
Following pages. These should content the rest of the paper, divided into sections under short headings. When-
ever possible the text should be arranged as follows: Introduction, Material and methods, Results, Discussion,
Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Unusual abbreviations used in the text must be grouped in
one alphabetic sequence after the Material and methods section.
• Notes should follow the same layout, without the abstract.
• Footnotes and cross-references must be avoided. The International Codes of Zoological and Botanical
Nomenclature must be strictly followed. The first mention in the text of any taxon must be followed by its
authority including the year. In systematic papers, when synonyms of a taxon are given, they must be cited IN
FULL, including the periodical, in an abbreviate form, where they were described, and the type localities in
square brackets when known. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Dendrodoris limbata (Cuvier, 1804)
Synonyms
Doris limbata Cuvier, 1804, Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. París, 4 (24): 468-469 [Type locality: Marseille].
Doris nigricans Otto, 1823, Nov. Act. Ac. Caes. Leop.-Car., 10: 275.
These references must not be included in the Bibliography list, except if referred to elsewhere in the text. If a
full list of references of the taxon is to be given immediately below it, the same layout should be followed (also
excluding from the Bibliography list those which are not cited elsewhere).
Only Latin words and ñames of genera and species should be underlined once or be given in italics. No word
must be written in UPPER CASE LETTERS. SI units are to be used, together with their appropriate symbols. In
Spanish manuscripts, decimal numbers must be separated with a comma (,), NEVER with a point (.) or upper
comma (').
• References in the text should be written in small letters or Small capitals: Fretter and Graham (1962) or
Fretter and Graham (1962). The first mention in the text of a paper with more than two authors must
inelude all of them [Smith, Jones and Brown (1970)], thereafter use et al. [Smith et al. (1970)]. If an author has
published more than one paper per year, refer to them with letters: (Davis, 1989a; Davis, 1989b). Avoid op. cit.
The references in the reference list should be in alphabetical order and inelude all the publications cited in the
text but only these. ALL the authors of a paper must be included. These should be written in small letters or
Small capitals. The references need not be cited when the author and date are given only as authority for a tax-
onomic ñame. Tifies of periodicals must be given IN FULL, not abbreviated. For books, give the title, ñame of
publisher, place of publication, indication of edition if not the first and total number of pages. Keep references
to doctoral theses or any other unpublished documents to an absolute minimum. See the following examples
(please note the punctuation):
Fretter V. and Graham A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. Ray Society, London, 765 pp.
Ponder W.F. 1988. The Truncatelloidean (= Rissoacean) radiation - a preliminary phylogeny. In Ponder W.F.
(Ed.): Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, suppl. 4: 129-166.
Ros J. 1976. Catálogo provisional de los Opistobranquios (Gastropoda: Euthyneura) de las costas ibéricas. Mis-
celánea Zoológica, 3 (5): 21-51.
• Figures must be original and provided preferably in electronic format and adjusted to page format and
column size. These should be one column (57 mm) or two columns (121 mm) wide and up 196 mm high, or be
proportional to these sizes. Two columns format is recommended. It is essential that all figures be supplied in
their original format (e.g. photographs as high-grade .jpg or as .tif files, graphs as Excel spreadsheets or Corel-
Draw files), as the files inserted into WORD documents cannot be used for printing. Digital images must be
given their final printing size with a resolution at least 300 dpi for colour and halftones, and at least 600 dpi for
black/white.
Take into account possible reduction in lettering drawings; final lettering must be at least 2 mm high. In com-
posite drawings, each figure should be given a capital letter; additional lettering should be in lower-case
letters. A scale line, labelled with SI units, must be used to indicate size; magnification ratio must be avoided
as it may be changed during printing. UTM maps are to be used if necessary. Figures must be submi tted on
sepárate sheets, and numbered with consecutive Arabic numbers (1, 2, 3,...), without separating Tlates' and
'Figures'. Legends for Figures must be typed in numerical order on a sepárate sheet, and a Spanish translation
must be included. Follow this example (please note the punctuation):
Figure 1. Neodoris carvi. A: animal crawling; B: rhinophore; C: gills.
If abbreviations are to be used in illustrations, they should be included in the figure captions.
Authors wishing to publish illustrations in colour should consult with the editor and will be charged a contri-
bution of 30 € per page. They should otherwise follow the same standards as black and white prints.
If the authors want to send Figures in printed format, it is essential to supply good quality origináis. Half-tone
images must be of good contrast, and should be submitted in the final printing size. When mounting pho-
tographs in a block, ensure spacers are of uniform width. Remember that grouping photographs of varied con-
trast results in poor reproduction. Computer graphics must be printed on high quality white paper with a
láser printer.
• Tables must be numbered with Román numbers (I, II, III,...) and each typed on a sepárate sheet. Headings
should be typed on a sepárate sheet, together with their English translation. Complex tables should be
avoided. As a general rule, keep the number and extensión of illustrations and tables as reduced as possible.
• Manuscripts that do not conform to these instructions will be returned for correction before reviewing.
• Authors submitting manuscripts will receive an acknowledgement of receipt, including receipt date, and the
date the manuscript was sent for reviewing. Each manuscript will be critically evaluated by at least two refer-
ees. Based of these evaluations, the Editorial Board will decide on acceptance or rejection. Anyway, authors
will receive a copy of the referees' comments. If a manuscript is accepted, the Editorial Board may indicate
additional changes if desirable. Acceptable manuscripts will be returned to the author for consideration of
comments and criticism; a finalized manuscript must then be returned to the Editor, together with a CD con-
taining the article written with current Windows (but not a .docx format generated by Word 2007, mainly used
under Windows Vista) or Macintosh word processor. Dates of reception and acceptance of the manuscript will
appear in all published articles.
• Proofs will be e-mailed to the author for correcting errors and must be returned corrected within one week.
At this stage no stylistic changes will be accepted. Pay special attention to references and their dates in the text
and the Bibliography section, and also to numbers of Figures and Tables appearing in the text.
• Fifty reprints per article and a .pdf file will be supplied free of charge. Additional reprints must be ordered
when the page proofs are returned, and will be charged at cost. NO LATER orders will be accepted.
La Sociedad Española de Malacología
Junta Directiva desde el 11 de octubre de 2005
Presidente
Vicepresidente
Secretaria
Tesorero
Editor de Publicaciones
Bibliotecario
Vocales
José Templado González
Emilio Rolán Mosquera
María Carmen Salas Casanovas
Luis Murillo Guillen
Serge Gofas
Rafael Araujo Armero
Ramón M. Alvarez Halcón
Benjamín Gómez Moliner
Alberto Martínez Ortí
Diego Moreno Lampreave
José Ramón Arrébola Burgos
La Sociedad Española de Malacología se fundó el 21 de agosto de 1980. La sociedad se registró como una aso-
ciación sin ánimo de lucro en Madrid (Registro N° 4053) con unos estatutos que fueron aprobados el 12 de
diciembre de 1980. Esta sociedad se constituye con el fin de fomentar y difundir los estudios malacológicos
mediante reuniones y publicaciones. A esta sociedad puede pertenecer cualquier persona o institución interesada
en el estudio de los moluscos.
SEDE SOCIAL: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, d José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, España.
Cuotas para 2009:
INSCRIPCIÓN: 6 euros, además de la cuota correspondiente.
A los socios residentes en España se les aconseja domiciliar su cuota. Todos los abonos deberán enviarse al
Tesorero (dirección reseñada anteriormente) el 1 de enero de cada año. Los abonos se harán sin recargos para la
sociedad y en favor de la Sociedad Española de Malacología y no de ninguna persona de la junta directiva. Aque-
llos socios que no abonen su cuota anual dejarán de recibir las publicaciones de la Sociedad. Los bonos de ins-
cripción se enviarán junto con el abono de una cuota anual al Tesorero.
A los residentes en el extranjero se les ruega que abonen su cuota mediante giro postal en euros (internatio-
nal postal money orders in euros sent to the Treasurer). Members living in foreing countries can deduce 6 euros
if paid befo re 1 5 April.
Cada socio tiene derecho a recibir anualmente los números de Iberus, Reseñas Malacológicas y Noticiarios que
se publiquen.
Indice
3 9088 01533 3396
27 (2) 2009
ISSN 0212-3010