Journal of the
Entomological Society
of British Columbia
Volume 101 Issued December 2004 ISSN #0071-0733
Entomological
© 2004 Society of British
Columbia
COVER: Pelegrina montana (Araneae: Salticidae)
Male of Pelegrina montana (Emerton, 1981), a salticid spider common throughout Can-
ada and extending south into the northernmost and montane United States. Known from
deciduous bushes and trees associated with streams, rivers and bogs.
Illustration on coquille board by pen, dark pencil and white paint.
Original art by Wayne Madison, courtesy of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Har-
vard University. Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard University.
The Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia is
published annually in December by the Society
Copyright© 2004 by the Entomological Society of British Columbia
Designed and typeset by Ward Strong and Jen Perry.
Printed by Reprographics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Pgs
ERRATA
Volume 100, December 2003
Please note the following corrections to Volume 100 of
the Journal of the Entomological Society of British
Columbia:
Maclauchlan, L. E., L. Harder, J. H. Borden and J. E.
Brooks. Impact of the western balsam _ bark
beetle, Dryocoetes confusus Swain (Coleoptera:
Scolytidae), at the Sicamous Creek research site,
and the potential for semiochemical based
management in alternative silvicultural systems.
Journal of the Entomological Society of British
Columbia 100:27-41.
i Page 7.time 9:
2. Page 39, line 42:
Leroy Harder address should read
“206 — 330 East 1° Street, North
Vancouver, B.C. V7L 1B5”.
Acknowledgements, change final
sentence to read “This study was
the subject of Leroy Harder’s
M.P.M_ thesis (Harder 1998)
funded in part by Forest Renewal
B.C. and the B.C. Forest Service.”
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 1
Journal of the
Entomological Society of British Columbia
Volume 101 Issued December 2004 ISSN #0071-0733
Directors of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 2004-2005 ....0......cccceccceecceceseceseeeseeeeeeeeseecsseeseeeeeeeesseeesseens 2
Gary J.R. Judd and Mark G.T. Gardiner. Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication and mating in Cydia
pomonella, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) using Isomate-CM/LR
ATIGAN DIS OPCW AES scan sree use ssases vasanaconne cher ceeceo mua see ten nd sual aud aannh moe ads nis eaten pdemnegraasheate aut cneaateeavecacess Goreneaines 3-14
Heather L. McBrien and Gary J.R. Judd. Emergence of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth, Spi/onota ocellana
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in relation to temperature and apple tree phenology at Summerland, British Columbia.....
eee drew one Ng a pate ph si Puta a nical ee aloe sist acs w seel nue Sec crete SAR ac pea ESE pean eg eee eee Dene em me mane Pee le 15-28
Gary J.R. Judd, Mark G.T. Gardiner and Howard M.A. Thistlewood. Seasonal variation in recapture of mass-reared
sterile codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): implications for control by sterile insect
COGMNIGS TTS COMM DL oe: Senet dana sco vauadete t conchae: seoactusadnchsesntuceevateeececodtesacdsueedne saceuesna tun Ae peseeaenteeeite cea. 29-44
A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl and Propy] (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoates in Codling Moth Management: Improved
Monitoring AnBartlett Pear with Hagin DOSE EAMES. scgcxesensestezieettig decnccusstroacsnncetenthcar aatccehtetees Geeeetgranaueneedceannes 45-52
A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth Management: Stimulation of Ovi-
[0,051 16) 1 Saree nee ne te Re Dee We Rey ve ee era NOmrar eer raat ete eeert Te erro Rer ena eid, ore Serr emer tah PORN Drea ar rere en Teenie ry ese er 53-60
A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth Management: Kairomone Species
NDE CLITCUEY ¥ natcrSccna ences ncuomeniag tea tacne ter atirst eas snatanetyag een etnngabiadna votes scars geansmuadenensp eat daha ad Vind aetelae ae a eaet hreae Dr emuius 61-68
A.L. Knight. Managing Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with an Internal Grid of Either Aerosol Puffers or
Dispenser Clusters Plus Border Applications of Individual Dispensers .....................:ccseeeeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaes 69-78
A.L. Knight and T.E. Larsen. Improved Deposition and Performance of a Microencapsulated Sex Pheromone Formula-
tion for Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with a Low Volume Application ...........0.ccccecceeeeeeeteeeteeeenees 79-86
J.E. Cossentine and L.B.M. Jensen. Persistence of a commercial codling moth granulovirus product on apple fruit and
128) f°. ere nee SESE NAT TS te mnt ene tr Oey Mem Ner ri e eanemies tire en eT Ten Tre Trew SbPael Ser bromine ever Weer weee rit ae Py 11 tacts mee tn ior earl 87-92
R.F. Smith, J.E. Cossentine, S.M. Rigby and C.S. Sheffield. Species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in organic
BP Ple OLCHALAS OFS MIEISIy CO el goes sey cca anyon coon tact a veremers tesa cones vaciysassesssapeeeeiaeleisscevier eins elmer en tiene aes 93-100
David R. Horton. Phenology of emergence from artificial overwintering shelters by some predatory arthropods common
liapeat orchards Of Une P acitie IN OLE CSU oi ccc tac ts sonnets csstcsce-crasieaedeess ohceueeeanrniaouensan Aoasazes tenaereases tea emies Meee 101-108
Kevin J. Dodds and Darrell W. Ross. Douglas-fir beetle lipid levels in relation to tree physical characteristics ..........
Betcha Desa t hen te sh tslesatag Cade caepp cman Mesa ah chad eV tea the SeaqPe dello cada wnt chet chavareta aad nesea plese shabten ic eee tied eae De Rae 109-116
John H. Borden, Deepa S. Pureswaran and Lisa M. Poirier. Evaluation of two repellent semiochemicals for disruption of
attack by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) ................ 117-124
G.G.E. Scudder. Heteroptera (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha) New to Canada. Part 2 ........0..cccccccccccsseeseeeeeesseeteeeeeens 125-130
John P. Simaika and Robert A. Cannings. Lestes disjunctus Selys and L. forcipatus Rambur (Odonata: Lestidae): Some
SSO LUUCTCOTAS EQ teal Cle HCl TA ENB sak ken cng caesar cada anes ocose- a suo ones tour dune eas 131-140
SCIENTIFIC NOTES
R.S. Vernon. A ground-based pheromone trap for monitoring Agriotes lineatus and A. obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
stil ccausisdeadisssilacalen Cavieuaes cosine Giz eanc see teense ta grtvg atone Wits <taucaaesc aot iepelst tua nid ass cust guna tae AnAesene aeupedos Whvaasgotte iota maw eae 141-142
Sarah L. Bates and John H. Borden. Parasitoids of Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Heteroptera: Coreidae) in British
CORI D I etiegeene sae te es mes tect ar ear Tame ae Ea a pt epee oo eae soci used peared Sas anata sae 143-144
Darrell W. Ross, Gary E. Daterman and A. Steven Munson. Evaluation of the antiaggregation pheromone, 3-
methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH), to protect live spruce from spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation in
SOUS I) Cal eee ea tec eere cee eaciescalh ins ge a Maa Ss a Loan ee A ate a casa Saget mei pesataee nce pntae anc ina esate maar 145-146
R.D. Kenner and K.M. Needham. New waterboatmen records for Western Canada (Hemiptera: Corixidae)...... 147-148
Christopher J. Borkent and Robert A. Cannings. Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae) in
British Columbia: first collection records of an invasive European paper wasp in Canada...............c:eeeees 149-150
IN@ ECT TO COIN TREE UT ORG reac ooo e sa pcos ieee lose yeaa dpaqiles visa vasusirnsun eacaduencs epaeedeeniasne tiers cacBaneee Inside Back Cover
NO
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
DIRECTORS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FOR 2004-5
President:
Dave Raworth
AAFC-PARC Agassiz
President-Elect:
Karen Needham
Spencer Entomological Museum
Past-President:
Bob Vernon
AAFC-PARC Agassiz
Secretary/Treasurer:
Robb Bennett
BC Ministry of Forests, 7380 Puckle Rd. Saanichton BC V8M 1W4
Directors, first term:
Jen Perry, Hugh Philip, Niki Hobischak
Director, second term:
Vince Nealis
Regional Director of National Society:
Allan Carroll
Canadian Forest Service, Victoria
Editorial Committee, Journal:
Ward Strong (Editor), Dave Raworth,
Peter Belton, Ken Naumann, Lorraine MacLauchlan,
Editor of Web Site:
Bill Riel
Canadian Forest Service, Victoria
Co-Editors, Boreus:
Jennifer Heron and Suzie Lavallee
Honourary Auditor:
Bob Vernon
AAFC-PARC Agassiz
Web Page: http://esbc.harbour.com/
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication
and mating in Cydia pomonella, Choristoneura rosaceana
and Pandemis limitata Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using
Isomate-CM/LR in apple orchards
GARY J.R. JUDD' and MARK G.T. GARDINER’
ABSTRACT
Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication and mating of codling moth,
Cydia pomonella (L), and four leafroller (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) species, Choristo-
neura rosaceana (Harris), Pandemis limitata (Robinson), Archips rosanus (L.) and Ar-
chips argyrospilus (Walker ) using an incomplete mixture of their individual pheromone
components was studied in organic apple orchards, in Cawston, BC, 1997. Multi-species
disruption with a single 500 'rope' dispenser / ha application of Isomate-CM/LR was
compared to a single 500 dispenser / ha application of Isomate-C. Season-long disrup-
tion was assessed using synthetic pheromone traps and laboratory-reared females in
mating tables. Mean seasonal recaptures of sterile male C. pomonella, using 10 mg
codlemone lures in orchards receiving releases of 1000 males / ha / week, were not sig-
nificantly different in half-orchard plots (0.5 - 1 ha) of Isomate-CM/LR or Isomate-C.
Mating of C. pomonella in Isomate-C- and Isomate-CM/LR-treated plots was negligible.
Isomate-CM/LR significantly reduced catches of C. rosaceana and P. limitata relative
to catches in Isomate-C-treated plots. Few A. rosanus and no A. argyrospilus were
caught in any orchard. Mating of C. rosaceana and P. limitata in lsomate-CM/LR-
treated plots was significantly less than in Isomate-C-treated plots. Our results indicate
Isomate-CM/LR will disrupt mating of C. pomonella equivalent to Isomate-C and may
provide sufficient disruption of leafrollers to supplement biological control in organic
orchards. Further studies are needed to show impacts of mating disruption on leafroller
populations and damage when applied to larger areas and for several seasons sequen-
tially.
Key Words: Codling moth, leafrollers, mating disruption, Isomate, organic apples
INTRODUCTION
Disruption of pheromone communica-
tion and mating of moths by releasing syn-
thetic pheromones into the atmosphere is
being employed worldwide as a highly-
specific alternative to insecticides (Jutsum
and Gordon 1989; Ridgway ef al. 1990;
Cardé and Minks 1995). While the speci-
ficity of pheromone controls is appealing
for integrated programmes, this specificity
undermines use in crops where secondary
pests may become primary pests when use
of insecticides is reduced (Croft and Hoyt
1983). Apple production in the Pacific
Northwest is a good example of where
pheromone-based mating disruption
(Howell 1992; Judd et al. 1996) as a re-
placement for broad-spectrum insecticides
to control codling moth, Cydia pomonella
(L.), has resulted in increasing damage
from several species (Brunner ef al. 1994;
Knight 1995; Gut and Brunner 1998) that
are controlled to some degree by insecti-
cides targeting codling moth (Madsen and
Proctor 1985).
One solution to this problem is to
broaden the range of action of mating-
' Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, 4200 Hwy 97, Summerland,
B.C., Canada VOH 1Z0
4 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
disruption products by combining phero-
mone components common to more than
one species, or by mixing uncommon
pheromone components from different
species. There are few published examples
of multi-species mating-disruption
(Ridgway et al. 1990; Cardé and Minks
1995) but where this has been attempted it
usually involves pheromone components
common to closely related species (Pfeiffer
et al. 1993; Deland et al. 1994; Evenden et
al. 1999a,b). For example, four species of
leafrollers (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) found
infesting apple orchards in BC (Madsen
and Madsen 1980), the obliquebanded lea-
froller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris),
threelined leafroller, Pandemis limitata
(Robinson), European leafroller, Archips
rosanus (L.) and fruit-tree leafroller, Ar-
chips argyrospilus (Walker), all use (Z)-
11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11-14:Ac) as the
major component in their multi-component
pheromone blends (Arn ef a/. 1982). In
small-plot studies, Deland ef al. (1994)
demonstrated that pheromone communica-
tion in C. rosaceana, A. rosanus, and A.
argyrospilus could be disrupted with a
93:7 blend of Z11-14:Ac and (E£)-11-
tetradecenyl acetate (£11-14:Ac), and
Evenden et al. (1999b) showed it was pos-
sible to simultaneously disrupt mating of
C. rosaceana and P. limitata with a 98:2
blend of Z11-14:Ac and £11-14:Ac. Ef-
fectiveness of unattractive, generic phero-
mone blends as mating disruptants for
these species is probably related to the fact
that attraction to pheromone dispensers,
1.e. false-trail following (sensu Bartell
1982), may not be necessary to achieve a
high percentage of disruption (Knight ef
al.1998; Evenden ef al. 1999a,b,c; Knight
and Turner 1999).
The alternative idea of using one dis-
pensing system to release pheromone com-
ponents uncommon to all species being
targeted has been around for some time
(Deventer et al. 1992), but there are few
examples or commercial products.
Isomate-CM/LR 1s a multi-species mating-
disruption product that was registered in
1997 for commercial use in the United
States to control codling moth and leafrol-
lers. Isomate-CM/LR was not registered in
Canada at that time because efficacy data
were lacking (Heather McBrien, personal
communication) and to the best of our
knowledge there are still no published data
on its use in Canada. With a view towards
registering mating-disruption products for
simultaneous control of codling moth and
leafrollers in BC we tested the utility of
Isomate-CM/LR as a commercial mating-
disruption product (Shin-etsu. Chemical
Company, Tokyo, Japan).
The primary objective of this study was
to test the hypothesis that codling moth
pheromone could be mixed in the same
reservoir and released with pheromone
components of leafrollers without compro-
mising disruption of this ‘key’ pest of ap-
ples which can be controlled with regis-
tered single-species disruption products
like Isomate-C (Judd et al. 1996,1997).
Secondly, we wanted a season-long assess-
ment of communication and mating disrup-
tion of leafrollers with Isomate-CM/LR in
commercial orchards, because previous
work was conducted for short test periods,
in small plots, with noncommercial dis-
pensers (Deland ef al. 1994; Evenden et al.
1999a,b,c). Our third objective was to
begin gathering efficacy data on Isomate-
CM/LR for Canadian registration agencies
which was lacking in 1997.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test Orchards. Experiments were con-
ducted in five, commercial organic apple
orchards located in the Similkameen Val-
ley, Cawston, BC (Judd et al. 1997). Or-
chards ranged in size from | - 2 ha and
were composed of mixed apple varieties
planted at densities of 600 - 900 trees / ha
with tree x row spacings of 2.4 - 4.6 x 4.6 -
5.5 m, respectively. Trees ranged in height
from 2.5 - 3.5 m and were pruned using a
pyramid shape training system. Wild
populations of codling moth were very low
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
in these orchards due to successful use of
mating disruption since 1990 (Judd ef al.
1997) and benefits derived from release of
sterile moths by the Okanagan-Kootenay
Sterile Insect Release (SIR) programme
(Dyck and Gardiner 1992). During the
current study, SIR programme staff were
releasing 1000 mixed sex (1:1 male:female
ratio) sterile codling moths in each ha of
every orchard two times each week. These
standardized releases ensured there were
approximately equal numbers of codling
moths present in all orchards where we
could assess disruption. No insecticides
were applied to these orchards during this
study.
Pheromone Disruption Treatments.
Each orchard was divided into approxi-
mately equal halves (0.5 - 1 ha). One half
was treated with Isomate-C and the other
with Isomate-CM/LR. Both of these prod-
ucts are ‘rope-type’ twist-tie dispensers
marketed by Pacific Buiocontrol Corp.,
Vancouver, WA. Isomate-C 1s a translu-
cent polyethylene dispenser containing a
155 mg blend of 58.8% (E,E)-8,10-
dodecadien-l-ol (codlemone), 29.5% do-
decanol, 5.3% tetradecanol and 6.4 % inert
ingredients. Isomate-CM/LR is a brownish
red polyethylene dispenser containing a
285 mg blend of 36.9% codlemone, 1.8%
isomers of codlemone, 6.0% dodecanol,
1.2% tetradecanol, 43.5% Z11-14:Ac,
2.4% E11-14:Ac, and 8.2% inert ingredi-
ents, with similar design and release-rate
characteristics as Isomate-C’ which has
superceded Isomate-C as a commercial
product but which contains the same active
ingredients (Don Thomson, personal com-
munication).
All pheromone dispensers were de-
ployed at a rate of 500 / ha between 1 May
and 6 May. Dispensers were attached to
branches in the upper third of the tree can-
opy ca. 0.5 - 1.0 m below the tip of the
central leader or on the first lateral branch
down from the tip.
Disruption of Pheromone Communi-
cation. Disruption of pheromone commu-
nication in codling moth was assessed by
comparing catches of SIR-released sterile
male moths in synthetic pheromone-baited
traps in the two disruption treatments.
Two Pherocon 1-CP style closed wing
traps (Phero Tech Inc., Delta, B.C.) baited
with 10 mg of codlemone (99% isomeric
and chemical purity, Shin-etsu, Fine
Chemicals Division, Tokyo, Japan) were
deployed in each pheromone-treated plot
(two traps / half-orchard treatment). Traps
were hung ca.1.5 - 2.0 m above ground
near the centre of each treatment on 8 May
and were checked weekly until 18 Septem-
ber. Trap bottoms were replaced weekly
and lures were changed every third week.
Sterile codling moths were identified by an
internal red dye sequestered from the artifi-
cial diet used to rear them (Dyck and Gar-
diner 1992).
Trap catches in pheromone-treated or-
chards were compared with catches in ad-
jacent, paired conventional orchards also
receiving sterile moths. These insecticide-
treated, but non-pheromone-treated or-
chards, are hereafter referred to as “non-
treated”. Two wing traps baited with 1 mg
of codlemone were deployed as above in
each non-treated orchard. Weekly catches
in these orchards provide a seasonal record
of sterile moth activity in the absence of
pheromone-disruption treatments.
Disruption of pheromone communica-
tion in leafrollers was assessed by compar-
ing catches of male C. rosaceana, P. limi-
tata, A. rosanus, and A. argyrospilus in the
two pheromone-treated halves of each or-
ganic orchard. Two Pherocon 1-C style
open (5 cm spacer) wing traps (Phero Tech
Inc., Delta, B.C.) baited with 3 mg (Deland
et al. 1994) of each species’ pheromone
were deployed in the middle of each
pheromone-treatment (two traps / species /
disruption treatment x four species). One
trap for each species was hung ca.1.5 - 2.0
m above ground on different sides of the
same tree, in each of two separate trees, ca.
20 m apart in the centre row of each plot.
Positions for all traps remained fixed
throughout the season. Traps were
checked weekly from June 6 until Septem-
ber 18 when moths were removed and
counted. All pheromone lures were
6 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
changed at three-week intervals and trap
bottoms were replaced as needed.
Synthetic pheromone baits for each
leafroller species were prepared with
chemical components (Aldrich Chemical
Company Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
USA) of known purity, as confirmed by
gas-chromatographic analysis (Z11-14:Ac,
98% with 2% E11-14:Ac; Z11-14:Ald,
96%; Z11-14-:0H, 97%; Z9-14:Ac, 96%,
and 12:Ac, 97%) using published ratios
(Roelofs et al. 1976a,b; Vakenti ef al.
1988; Deland ef al. 1993).
In making pheromone lures for all five
species, a 200 pl solution of each phero-
mone blend was dissolved in dichloro-
methane and loaded into separate red rub-
ber septa (Aldrich Chemical Company
Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). After
loading, septa were air dried for ca. 18 h at
23 °C in a fume hood and stored at 0 °C
until pinned to the inner side of trap lids in
the field.
Disruption of Mating. Disruption of
mating was assessed using virgin female
moths in mating tables described by
McBrien and Judd (1996). Only mating of
C. pomonella, C. rosaceana, and P. limi-
tata, was assessed because these were the
only species we had in rearing. C. pomo-
nella were reared on an artificial diet
(Dyck and Gardiner 1992) at 27 °C under a
16:8 h L:D photoregime and C. rosaceana
and P. limitata were reared on a modified
pinto bean-based diet (Shorey and Hale
1965) at 24 °C and 16:8 h photoregime.
Female pupae of each species were placed
individually in 150-ml plastic cups pro-
vided with a wet cotton wick until adults
eclosed. Female moths aged 24 - 72 h
were immobilized at 0.5 °C and one fore-
wing and a tarsal tip were clipped with fine
forceps before transporting them to field
sites in refrigerated containers.
Individual females of these three spe-
cies were placed in the same tree, in the
upper third of the canopy, in each of five
trees laid out in a die pattern centred in
each pheromone-treated plot. Females
were several trees removed from their re-
spective species-specific pheromone traps.
Availability of female C. pomonella al-
lowed us to deploy mating tables in non-
treated orchards for comparison, but short-
ages of leafrollers prevented this deploy-
ment. All female moths were placed in the
field in the afternoon and removed the fol-
lowing morning to minimize predation and
escape. Females recovered from the field
were returned to the laboratory and each
bursa copulatrix was dissected and exam-
ined for the presence of a spermatophore
which indicates they had mated. Females
were omitted from the data if they were
dead when recovered.
Female C. pomonella were placed in
the field on two nights, every second week
from 19 May until 6 September. Female
leafrollers were placed in the field on 2 to
4 nights, every week for three consecutive
weeks starting 3 July and 12 August which
corresponded to peak flight periods of first
and second generation, respectively.
Harvest Fruit Damage. Although our
experiments were not designed to evaluate
crop protection specifically, a sample of
2500 fruit was taken from each phero-
mone-treated plot in each of the five or-
ganic orchards in order to establish back-
ground levels of leafroller damage for fu-
ture reference. Samples were taken during
normal harvest dates as fruit maturity and
growers dictated. All fruit were examined
for damage from codling moth, including
stings and deep entries, and early and late
season leafroller feeding. Each _half-
orchard treatment was sampled by walking
a “W” pattern from corner to corner and
edge to edge and systematically choosing
25 trees, 5 edge and 20 interior trees. One
hundred fruit were removed from each
sample tree by picking 50 low and 50 high
fruit from south-side branches.
Statistical Analyses. | For each spe-
cies, moth captures from both traps in each
pheromone treatment in the same orchard
were pooled and transformed (logy [x +1])
to normalize the data. Mean seasonal cu-
mulative moth catches in the two phero-
mone treatments were compared using an
analysis of variance (ANOVA) appropriate
for a randomized block design (Zar 1984),
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
where orchards are blocks (n = 5) and there
are 2 pheromone treatments assigned ran-
domly to either half orchard. Statistical
comparisons were not made between cod-
ling moth catches in pheromone-treated
and non-treated orchards because the latter
orchards were treated with insecticides that
could confound any comparison. In addi-
tion, different strength lures were used to
monitor codling moth in pheromone-
treated and non-treated orchards. How-
ever, catches of sterile codling moths from
non-treated orchards are presented for
comparisons of their relative seasonal ac-
tivity. Low recovery of females in mating
tables meant mean percentage mating per
orchard could not be estimated reliably,
therefore recovered females were pooled
across orchards by treatment and y° tests
were used to compare the frequency of
mating in the two pheromone treatments.
A randomized block ANOVA was used to
compare mean damage estimates from the
two treatments after an arcsine Vp transfor-
mation of the data.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Disruption of Pheromone Communi-
cation in C. pomonella. In non-treated
orchards the mean (+ SE) seasonal catch of
sterile codling moths / trap (1051.7 +
307.2) was several times greater than
catches in either pheromone-treatment
(Table 1). Comparing catches of C. pomo-
nella in this way likely underestimates the
level of disruption achieved by pheromone
treatments, because traps were baited with
different strength lures and _ insecticides
may have reduced catches of sterile moths
in non-treated orchards. While the SIR
programme dictated use of 1 mg lures in
conventional orchards, we chose to use 10
mg lures in pheromone-treated plots be-
cause they ensured sufficient moth cap-
tures to detect differences in pheromone
treatments. Disorientation of C. pomonella
would likely appear greater had we used 1
mg lures in pheromone-treated orchards,
because they catch very few moths in this
situation relative to 10 mg lures (Judd ef
al. 1996). Correcting for this difference in
relative attraction we calculate from
catches in Table 1, that Isomate-C caused
91% and Isomate-CM/LR caused 90%
disorientation relative to the 1051 moths
caught / trap in non-treated orchards.
There was no significant difference (P
> 0.05) in the mean seasonal number of
sterile moths caught / trap in plots treated
with Isomate-C (274.5 + 44.4) or Isomate-
CM/LR (311.9 + 126.2). This result indi-
cates that both pheromone treatments dis-
rupted orientation of codling moth to a
similar extent and therefore, the release of
leafroller pheromone components from
Isomate-CM/LR had no detrimental affect
on disruption of codling moth pheromone
communication (Table 1).
Mean weekly catches of sterile C.
pomonella pooled across pheromone-
treated orchards (Fig. 1A) reveals few
weekly differences between rates of recap-
ture in plots treated with Isomate-C or
Isomate-CM/LR, suggesting both dispens-
ers were equally disruptive under varied
weekly weather conditions. Weekly
catches of sterile moths under both phero-
mone treatments was low early in the sea-
son and began to increase near 3 July (Fig.
1A). This increase is more likely caused
by a general increase in the activity of ster-
ile moths, or response to traps as the sea-
son progressed, than by decreasing effects
of disruption treatments. This conclusion
is based on the fact that catches of sterile
males in non-treated orchards also doubled
in weeks 9 - 16 compared with weeks | - 8
(Fig. 1A).
Disruption of Pheromone Communi-
cation in Leafrollers. Mean seasonal
catches of C. rosaceana and P. limitata
were both significantly (P < 0.05) lower in
the Isomate-CM/LR treatment than in the
Isomate-C treatment (Table 1). Almost no
Archips spp. were caught in any orchards,
supporting the view that these species are
generally found further north and more
8 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
Seasonal cumulative catches of male moths in synthetic pheromone-baited traps and mating of
sentinel females in mating tables for each of four species in each half of five organic apple
orchards treated with different commercial pheromone dispensers, Cawston, BC, 1997.
Commercial pheromone disruption Mean (+ SE) number
treatment (500 dispensers / ha)
Moth species’
Isomate-C
Isomate-CM/LR
C. pomonella
Isomate-C
Isomate-CM/LR
C. rosaceana
Isomate-C
Isomate-CM/LR
P. limitata
Isomate-C
Isomate-CM/LR
A. rosanus
Isomate-C
Isomate-CM/LR
A. argyrospilus
% of females
of moths / trap” mating”
275.5+ 44.4a 0.0a
311.9+ 126.2a 0.9a
752.7 + 356.8a 25.9a
124.2 + 187.6b 7.8b
542.7 + 241.5a 32.6a
84.7 + 103.7b 5.6b
2.0+ 0.8 nt 0.0 nt
00 00 0.0
00+ 0.0nt 0.0 nt
002 “0:0 0.0
' All C. pomonella caught were sterile moths released (1000 males / ha / orchard / week) by the
Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Programme.
> Means of seasonal cumulative catches in two traps in each of five orchards. Paired means
within a species followed by different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) by Random-
ized Block ANOVA. nt = no test.
* Paired percentages within a species followed by different letters are significantly (P < 0.05)
different by x’ tests on observed frequencies of mating.
frequently in the Okanagan than in the
Similkameen Valley (Madsen and Madsen
1980).
Weekly catches of C. rosaceana are
shown in Fig. 1B. Catch curves in both
treatments reflect a large first-generation
and small second-generation flight. This
pattern is typically seen in insecticide-
treated orchards and is thought to occur
because insecticides applied during first
generation reduce second-generation popu-
lations (Madsen and Madsen 1980). This
cannot explain our results because organic
orchards were not treated with insecticides.
A small second-generation flight may arise
because first-brood larvae often enter dia-
pause early in this region. Therefore, con-
trol of this first generation is important
because it prevents an escape of insects
that give rise to an overwintering popula-
tion with potential to undermine long-term
control.
Weekly catches of C. rosaceana were
reduced 70.9 - 100% in the Isomate—CM/
LR treatment relative to the Isomate-C
treatment (Fig. 1B), and reductions aver-
aged 90.3% for the season across all or-
chards (Table 1). Deland et al. (1994)
reported a similar 89 - 91% average disori-
entation of C. rosaceana to synthetic
pheromone traps in 0.1 ha plots treated
with 1000 - 2000 Hamaki-con (Shin-etsu
Chemical Company Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)
dispensers per ha, releasing a 93:7 blend of
Z11-14:Ac and £11-14:Ac at ca. 20 - 40
mg / ha / h (Deland 1992). Given that a
single Isomate-CM/LR dispenser releases
ca. 1 mg Z11-14:Ac / day in the Okanagan
Valley (GJRJ, unpublished data), 500
Isomate-CM/LR dispensers would release
ca. 21 mg / ha/h. Therefore, using more
than 500 Isomate-CM/LR dispensers per
ha to disrupt C. rosaceana would seem
unwarranted.
Weekly catches of P. limitata are
shown in Fig. 1C. Unlike catches of C.
rosaceana, which showed two distinct
peaks in the Isomate-C treatment (Fig. 1B),
catches of P. limitata remained high all
season in the Isomate-C treatment (Fig.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
a Isomate-CM/LR
Cydia pomonella
Pandemis limitata
Mean Number of Moths Caught / Trap / Week
[etl Isomate-C
ZA Non-treated
ee eee
Date
Figure 1. Mean weekly catches of mass-reared, sterile male Cydia pomonella released by the
Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme (A), wild male Choristoneura rosaceana (B) and wild
male Pandemis limitata (C) in their respective species-specific synthetic pheromone-baited
traps hung in non-treated conventional apple orchards (C. pomonella) and in Isomate-C- and
Isomate-CM/LR-treated halves of organic apple orchards (all species) in Cawston, BC, 1997.
1C). This is quite different from the two
distinct peaks Madsen and Madsen (1980)
observed in insecticide-treated conven-
tional orchards. Catches of P. limitata in
the Isomate-CM/LR treatment showed
early and late season peaks, but moths
were always being caught in low numbers.
A second peak in the Isomate-CM/LR
treatment may indicate leafroller phero-
mone was running out late in the season as
found by Knight et a/. (2001). Given the
date dispensers were deployed and a | mg /
day release rate, dispensers were expected
to run out of Z11-14:Ac between 24 - 30
August, exactly when the second peak of
catches occurred (Fig. 1C). To make it a
reliable product more data are needed on
the release of various pheromone compo-
nents from Isomate-CM/LR dispensers in
relation to temperature.
Weekly catches of P. limitata were
reduced 67 - 100% by treatment with
Isomate-CM/LR (Fig. 1C) and reductions
averaged 88.9% for the season across all
orchards (Table 1), relative to the Isomate-
C treatment.
Disruption of Mating in C. pomo-
nella. Mating of C. pomonella in non-
10 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
treated orchards receiving sterile moths
averaged 48.7% during late May and June
and 59% in July and August. In spite of
very large numbers of sterile males being
released in this study (1000 / ha / week),
almost no sentinel female C. pomonella
mated in either pheromone treatment, and
there was no significant difference (y° =
0.34, df= 1, P > 0.05) in the frequency of
mating in the Isomate-C (0 / 223) and
Isomate-CM/LR treatments (2 / 212).
Mating frequency of C. pomonella in our
Isomate-C treatment was quite low when
compared with the frequencies of mating
among feral codling moths reported by
Knight (1996) using passive pane traps, or
by Howell (1992) using black light traps,
both in Isomate-C-treated orchards. While
there may be discrepancy between differ-
ent assessment methods, our evaluation of
mating is suitable in this context because
the relative difference in mating between
the two pheromone treatments is of interest
here. Given that Isomate-Cis known to
control populations of C. pomonella (Judd
et al. 1996) and there appears to be little
difference in levels of trap disorientation
and mating disruption using Isomate-CM/
LR, we expect the level of control with
these two products to be simular.
Disruption of Mating in Leafrollers.
On average, 25.9% (14 / 54) of female C.
rosaceana and 32.6% (34 / 104) of female
P. limitata mated when placed in the
Isomate-C treatment having no leafroller
pheromone, while only 7.8% (5 / 64) and
5.6% (6 / 107) of each species, respec-
tively, mated in the Isomate-CM/LR treat-
ment. Isomate-CM/LR significantly (y° =
5.84, df = 1, P < 0.05) reduced mating of
C. rosaceana by 70% and P. limitata by
83% (y° = 23.4, df = 1, P< 0.001), relative
to the Isomate-C treatment. Our seasonal
level of mating disruption in C. rosaceana
was somewhat lower than the 86% ob-
served by Evenden et al. (1999b) using a
similar blend (100:2 ratio of Z11-14:Ac
and £11-14:Ac) and the same dispenser
density (500 / ha) in 0.1 ha plots. Lower
levels of disruption in our study may be
due to higher population densities, or
movement of Z11-14:Ac into the Isomate-
C treatment used for comparison. Simulta-
neous release of codlemone from Isomate-
CM/LR dispensers cannot explain any dif-
ferences between these studies because C.
rosaceana is not known to detect this
chemical (GJRJ, unpublished electroanten-
nograms).
Mating of C. rosaceana was similar in
first (7.4%) and second generation (8.1%)
and although catches of P. limitata in-
creased during second generation (Fig.
1C), there was no increase in the frequency
of their mating between first (7.5%) and
second (2.4%) generation in Isomate-CM/
LR-treated plots. Therefore, the amount of
pheromone being released late in the sea-
son appears to have been adequate to con-
trol mating in leafrollers even if catches
appeared to increase (Fig. 1C). Our 83%
seasonal average mating disruption for P.
limitata was similar to the 85% observed
by Evenden ef al. (1999b) when 1000 dis-
pensers / ha were employed. Like C.
rosaceana above, there may be little value
in using more than 500 Isomate-CM/LR
dispensers per ha to disrupt mating in P.
limitata.
Fruit Damage. As expected given low
levels of wild codling moths, release of
sterile males, and treatment with phero-
mone, there was no detectable codling
moth damage in any orchard. _Leafroller
damage was very high in these organic
orchards and there was no significant (P >
0.05) difference in the mean percentage of
damage in plots receiving Isomate-C (10.9
+ 5.4%) or Isomate-CM/LR (8.7 + 4.7%).
These damage levels suggest densities of
leafrollers were very high and crop protec-
tion can fail under high population densi-
ties even if measures of disruption are
large (Judd et al. 1996, 1997). While we
do not consider our experiment to be a fair
evaluation of leafroller control by mating
disruption, these data should provide a
useful baseline for longer-term mating-
disruption trials.
Our studies have demonstrated it 1s
possible to simultaneously disrupt phero-
mone communication and mating in sym-
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
patric tortricid moths by releasing an in-
complete mixture of their individual phero-
mone components. Levels of disorienta-
tion and reductions in mating of all species
with Isomate-CM/LR were comparable to
those seen in studies examining each spe-
cies individually (Deland et al. 1994;
Evenden et al. 1999a,b,c). Our data sug-
gest control of codling moth with Isomate-
CM/LR should be comparable to control
with registered products like Isomate-C”
and Isomate-C (Judd et al. 1996).
Isomate-CM/LR also has potential for sup-
plementary control of leafrollers. These
conclusions are supported by several stud-
les using Isomate-CM/LR in Washington
State (Knight et a/. 1997; Knight 1998;
Knight et al. 2001). These non-refereed
reports suggest that when used on an area-
wide basis for three years (1998 - 2000),
orchards treated with Isomate-CM/LR and
supplemental insecticides had 41% less
leafroller damage, received one less spray
per season and consistently had less cod-
ling moth damage than orchards receiving
Isomate-C” and supplemental sprays.
Lacking in these studies unfortunately,
are data from Isomate-CM/LR-treated or-
chards receiving no supplemental insecti-
cides. Ours is the only evaluation of
Isomate-CM/LR where no _ insecticides
were applied and the only one reporting
actual mating data that we are aware of.
These kinds of data are useful for registra-
tion of pheromones in Canada. Efficacy
data based on fruit damage are also needed
but our study lacks this assessment because
the split-orchard design resulted in treat-
ment areas too small to prevent movement
of mated females or ballooning larvae be-
tween treatments. Therefore, it remains to
be shown whether measures of disruption
observed here will impact the population
dynamics of these species and control
damage effectively without use of insecti-
cides. In this regard, Isomate-CM/LR may
have a role to play in supplementing bio-
logical control of leafrollers in organic
apple orchards where parasitism rates as
high as 68% are common during summer
in the Similkameen Valley (Cossentine ef
al. 2004).
During the revision of this manuscript
Isomate-CM/LR was registered by the Ca-
nadian Pest Management Regulatory
Agency (Heather McBrien, personal com-
munication). Nevertheless, multiple-year
mating-disruption trials still need to be
conducted in larger orchards, or on an
area-wide basis (Knight et a/. 2001), and
under lower population pressure than seen
in this study, before any conclusions about
the efficacy of mating disruption as a crop-
protection tool for leafrollers in BC can be
made.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Similkameen-Okanagan
Organic Producers' Association (SOOPA)
and its cooperating members for allowing
us to conduct trials in their orchards. We
also thank Nicole Verpaelst for technical
field assistance. We especially thank Don
Thomson from Pacific Biocontrol Corpora-
tion for making Isomate-CM/LR available
for testing and sharing technical data on
this product. This research was partially
funded by the Washington State Tree Fruit
Research Commission, SOOPA and the
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Match-
ing Investment Initiative.
REFERENCES
Am, H., M. Toth, and E. Priesner. 1982. List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants,
2™ Edition. International Organization for Biological Control, Montfavet.
Bartell, R.J. 1982. Mechanisms of communication disruption by pheromone in the control of Lepidoptera:
areview. Physiological Entomology 7: 353-364.
Brunner, J.F., L.J. Gut, and A.L. Knight. 1994. Transition of apple and pear orchards to a pheromone-
based pest management system. Proceedings of the Washington State Horticultural Association 88:
169-175.
12 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Cardé, R.T. and A.K. Minks. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints.
Annual Review of Entomology 40: 559-585.
Cossentine, J., L. Jensen, E. Deglow, A. Bennett, H. Goulet, J. Huber, and J. O'Hara. 2004. The parasi-
toid complex affecting Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata in organically managed apple
orchards. BioControl 49: 359-372.
Croft, B.A. and S.C. Hoyt (eds.). 1983. Integrated Management of Insect Pests of Pome and Stone Fruits.
John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Deland, J.-P. 1992. Mating disruption of fruittree leafroller, Archips argyrospilus, and effects on other
leafroller species. Master of Pest Management Thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, Simon
Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. 78 pp.
Deland, J.-P., R. Gries, G. Gries, G.J.R. Judd, and B.D. Roitberg. 1993. Sex pheromone components of
the fruittree leafroller, Archips argyrospilus (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in British Columbia.
Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 2855-2864.
Deland, J.-P., G.J.R. Judd, and B.D. Roitberg. 1994. Disruption of pheromone communication in three
sympatric leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) pests of apple in British Columbia. Environmental
Entomology 23: 1084-1090.
Deventer, van P., A.K. Minks, L.H.M. Blommers, U. Neuman, and K. Jilderda. 1992. Mating disruption
utilizing lepidopterous sex pheromones: three years of testing in apple orchards in The Netherlands.
Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Pests and Diseases. 3: 1193-1198.
Dyck, V.A. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 1992. Sterile-insect release programme to control the codling moth
Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in British Columbia, Canada. Acta Phytopa-
thologica et Entomologica Hungarica 27: 219-222.
Evenden, M.L., G.J.R. Judd, and J.H. Borden. 1999a. Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communica-
tion in Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata with pheromone and antagonist blends. Jour-
nal of Chemical Ecology 25: 501-517.
Evenden, M.L., G.J.R. Judd, and J.H. Borden. 1999b. Mating disruption of two sympatric, orchard-
inhabiting tortricids, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with
pheromone components of both species’ blends. Journal of Economic Entomology 92: 380-390.
Evenden, M.L., G.J.R. Judd, and J.H. Borden. 1999c. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption of Choris-
toneura rosaceana: 1s the most attractive blend really the most effective? Entomologia Experimen-
talis et Applicata 90: 37-47.
Howell, J.F. 1992. Two years of commercial use of Isomate-C to disrupt mating for control of
codling moth. Proceedings of the Washington State Horticultural Association 88: 176-181.
Gut, L.J. and J.F. Brunner. 1998. Pheromone-based management of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) in Washington apple orchards. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 15: 387-405.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1996. Commercial trials of pheromone-mediated
mating disruption with Isomate-C® to control codling moth in British Columbia apple and pear or-
chards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 93: 23-34.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1997. Control of codling moth in organi-
cally-managed apple orchards by combining pheromone-mediated mating disruption, post-harvest
fruit removal and tree banding. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 137-146.
Jutsum, A.R. and R.F.S. Gordon (eds.). 1989. Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. John Wiley and
Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom. 369 pp.
Knight, A.L. 1995. The impact of codling moth (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) mating disruption on apple pest
management in Yakima Valley, Washington. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Colum-
bia 92: 29-38.
Knight, A.L. 1996. Why so many mated female codling moth in disrupted orchards? Proceedings of the
Washington State Horticultural Association 92: 213-214.
Knight, A.L. 1998. Development of mating disruption for leafrollers. Jn Proceedings of the 72" Annual
Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A. January 7-9,
1998. WOPDMC 72: 99.
Knight, A.L. and J.E. Turner. 1999. Mating disruption of Pandemis spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).
Environmental Entomology 28: 81-87.
Knight, A., S. Cockfield, D. Thomson, and D. Neff. 1997. Developing mating disruption for leafrollers.
In Proceedings of the 71 Annual Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, Port-
land, Oregon, U.S.A. January 8-10, 1997. WOPDMC 71: 112-114.
Knight, A.L., D.R. Thomson, and S.D. Cockfield. 1998. Developing mating disruption of obliquebanded
leafroller (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) in Washington State. Environmental Entomology 27: 1080-1088.
Knight, A.L., B.A. Christianson Jr., S. Cockfield, and J. Dunley. 2001. Areawide management of codling
moth and leafrollers. Good Fruit Grower 52 (11): 31-33.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 13
Madsen, H.F. and B.J. Madsen. 1980. Response of four leafroller species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to
sex attractants in British Columbia orchards. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 427-430.
Madsen, H.F. and P.J. Procter. 1985. Insects and mites of tree fruits in British Columbia. British Colum-
bia Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 82-6. Victoria, B.C. 70 pp.
McBrien, H.L., and G.J.R. Judd. 1996. Teflon®-walled mating table for assessing the efficacy of phero-
mone-based mating disruption. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 93: 121-
125:
Pfeiffer, D.G., W. Kaakeh, J.C. Killian, M.W. Lachance, and P. Kirsch. 1993. Mating disruption to con-
trol damage by leafrollers in Virginia apple orchards. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 67:
47-56.
Ridgway, R.L., R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe. 1990. Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect man-
agement, applications of pheromones and other attractants. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, U.S.A.
761 pp.
Roelofs, W., A. Cardé, A. Hill, and R. Cardé. 1976a. Sex pheromone of the threelined leafroller, Pan-
demis limitata. Environmental Entomology 5: 649-652.
Roelofs, W., A. Hill, A. Cardé, R. Cardé, H. Madsen, and J. Vakenti. 1976b. Sex pheromone of the Euro-
pean leafroller, Archips rosanus. Environmental Entomology 5: 362-364.
Shorey, H.H. and R.L. Hale. 1965. Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artifi-
cial medium. Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 522-524.
Vakenti, J.M., A.P. Guance, K.N. Slessor, G.G.S. King, S.A. Allan, H.F. Madsen, and J.H. Borden. 1988.
Sex pheromone components of the oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana in the
Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Journal of Chemical Ecology 14: 605-621.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 15
Emergence of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth,
Spilonota ocellana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
in relation to temperature and apple tree phenology
at Summerland, British Columbia
HEATHER L. MCBRIEN” and GARY J.R. JUDD”
ABSTRACT
We recorded daily appearance of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth (ESBM),
Spilonota ocellana (Denis & Schiffermiiller) in spring 1992, 1994, and 1996 in an un-
sprayed apple orchard at Summerland, British Columbia, to relate larval emergence to
degree-day (DD) accumulation and apple phenology. In all years the first larva was
found between mid-March and early April, and none appeared after late April. Median
emergence of larvae occurred when McIntosh apple trees were at early, tight-cluster
stage of fruit-bud development. Larval head capsule measurements showed that ESBM
usually overwinter as fifth and sixth instars, with a small proportion (<6%) as fourth-
instar larvae. In the laboratory we monitored emergence of non-diapausing overwin-
tered larvae from apple branches incubated at 8.8, 9.4, 12.9, 15.0, 18.0, and 20.9 °C. A
least-squares linear regression described emergence over this temperature range rela-
tively accurately (r° = 0.57, P < 0.05) and a base temperature for emergence (7; = 1.0 °C
+ 0.6) was extrapolated from this regression. Regression analysis indicated median
emergence should require 154.6 + 6.7 DD above 1 °C (DDj;°c). Using daily air-
temperature maxima and minima and | March to start accumulating DD; :c, the error
between predicted and observed days to median emergence in the field was -6.7 + 3.1 d;
the regression model predicted early in every case. Using observed larval appearance on
apples (1992, 1994, & 1996) and an iterative process, we determined that a combination
of 6 °C as the 7, and 1 January as a date to start accumulating DD6-c, minimized the
coefficient of variation for the three-year mean DD¢-c accumulations (82.7 + 3.5 DD¢6«c)
required for 50% of the larvae to appear in the field. While this latter DD index de-
scribed observed emergence of larvae accurately, and its use may help improve manage-
ment of ESBM, it should be validated using independent data before growers use it rou-
tinely.
Key Words: Spilonota ocellana, Tortricidae, larval development, phenology, degree
days
INTRODUCTION
The eye-spotted bud moth (ESBM), hemisphere (Weires and Riedl 1991).
Spilonota ocellana (Denis and Schiffer-
miiller), is a pest of apple (Gilliatt 1932,
MacLellan 1978), blueberry (Gillespie
1985), cherry (Oatman et al. 1962), and
prune (Madsen and Borden 1949) through-
out fruit-growing areas in the northern
ESBM is univoltine and larvae overwinter
in hibernaculae on branches of host plants.
Larvae crawl from hibernaculae in early
spring to feed on leaves and blossoms.
Pupation occurs in a nest of dead leaves
and blossoms held together with silk.
' Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, 4200 Hwy 97, Summerland,
British Columbia, Canada VOH 1Z0
>Current address: Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Sir Charles Tupper Building, 2720 Riverside
Dr., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed
16 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Adults emerge in early summer and lay
eggs singly on leaves (Weires and Riedl
1991, McBrien and Judd 1998). Summer-
generation larvae arising from these eggs
often feed on fruit surfaces causing dam-
age and discolouration beneath leaves at-
tached to fruit with silk (Gilliatt 1932).
In North America, ESBM has a history
of sporadic outbreaks in apple orchards
(MacLellan 1978) because insecticides
applied in summer against codling moth,
Cydia pomonella (L.) often control it indi-
rectly (Madsen and Downing 1968, British
Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisher-
ies and Food 2004). As non-insecticidal
methods like sterile male technique (Dyck
and Gardiner 1992) or pheromone-based
mating disruption (Judd et a/. 1996, Judd
and Gardiner 2004) have been imple-
mented to control codling moth and lea-
frollers (Tortricidae) in Bntish Columbia
(B.C.), feeding damage by ESBM has in-
creased (GJRJ unpublished data), mirror-
ing reports from The Netherlands
(Deventer et a/. 1992). Therefore, control
of ESBM in spring has become more criti-
cal. Insecticides applied in spring are often
timed to control leafrollers and green fruit
worms (Noctuidae), providing control of
ESBM only indirectly (Madsen and Down-
ing 1968, British Columbia Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 2004).
Therefore, strategies to control ESBM spe-
cifically need to be developed.
The ability to predict when overwin-
tered larvae of ESBM appear in spring
would be a useful tool in designing an inte-
grated management programme. The
phenology of ESBM larval emergence in
spring has been related to apple phenology
in other areas (Gilliatt 1932, Madsen and
Borden 1949, Oatman ef a/. 1962) but this
approach has not been validated in B.C.,
Canada, and may not provide consistent
prediction of emergence on different spe-
cies of host plant and on different varieties
of fruit trees across different years. A tem-
perature-based model to predict emergence
of overwintered larvae may be a more use-
ful approach as this technique has been
applied successfully against other species
of leafrollers in the Pacific Northwest
(Brunner 1991). We describe emergence
of overwintered larvae of the ESBM in
relation to degree-day (DD) accumulations
and apple tree phenology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collecting and Handling Prunings.
Several hundred 30-cm branch sections
were pruned from a mixed block of
McIntosh, Delicious, and Spartan apple
trees in an experimental apple orchard at
the Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre
(PARC) in Summerland, B.C. on 2 Febru-
ary 1992. No insecticides were applied to
this orchard for at least five years preced-
ing or during this study and it was heavily
infested with ESBM larvae in 1991. Prun-
ings consisting mainly of fruit-spur wood
and excluding previous years’ growth were
transported to the laboratory, stored in
cardboard boxes filled with moist sawdust,
and held in darkness at 0.4 + 0.5 °C until
required.
Diapause Termination. Before as-
sessing temperature-dependent emergence
of overwintered larvae, it was important to
ensure they had completed diapause so that
some portion of diapause development was
not included in any estimates of post-
diapause development time. Prunings col-
lected on 2 February and 1 March 1992,
when apple buds were still dormant, were
placed in a controlled-environment cham-
ber at 19 °C under a 13:11 h L:D photo-
regime provided by Daylight fluorescent
tubes. On each collection date, seventy
30-cm-long prunings were placed in a plas-
tic basin (35 cm x 35 cm x 16 cm), cov-
ered with polyester organza and held in
place with an elastic band that prevented
larva from escaping but permitted air cir-
culation. On 1 March, an equivalent
length of pruned branch sections was re-
moved from laboratory cold storage (0.4
°C) and set up identical to other pruning
samples. Every 24 h, prunings were re-
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
moved from their basin and tapped sharply
to dislodge active larvae onto a white
cloth. The number of larvae collected
daily was recorded and sampling was ter-
minated when larvae went undetected for
seven consecutive days after they began
appearing.
Emergence at Constant Tempera-
tures. On 7 May 1992, 66 days after being
placed at 0.4 °C as part of the diapause
study, ca. five hundred 30-cm sections of
prunings were removed from cold and di-
vided evenly among eight basins described
previously. One basin of prunings was
placed in each of seven separate con-
trolled-environment chambers set at 3.8,
8.8, 9.4, 12.9, 15.0, 18.0, or 20.9 °C, re-
spectively, each with a photoregime of
13:11 h L:D. One basin of prunings was
returned to 0.4 °C. Constant-temperature
conditions were chosen to approximate the
range of air temperatures and photoregime
normally experienced by ESBM larvae
during spring in the Okanagan Valley.
When prunings were placed in controlled-
temperature chambers on 7 May 1992,
larvae in the field had completed emer-
gence.
One larva emerged on day 54 from
prunings incubated at 0.4 °C and three lar-
vae emerged on days 9, 18, and 46 from
prunings incubated at 3.8 °C. Therefore,
on | July, 55 d after incubation, prunings
were transferred from 0.4 and 3.8 °C to the
18 °C constant-temperature incubator to
determine if larvae would emerge at the
higher temperature and if their emergence
times would be shorter than those placed at
constant 18 °C from the outset.
Linear Regression-based Emergence
Model. A linear DD emergence model,
lower threshold base temperature (7;), and
the DD requirements for median (50%)
emergence of larvae were determined ana-
lytically using linear regression techniques
(Campbell et al. 1974) applied to labora-
tory-derived constant-temperature emer-
gence data. Emergence time in days for
each larva at each constant temperature
was converted to an emergence rate by
taking the reciprocal (developmental rate =
1 / days to emerge). Emergence rates for
all larvae at each temperature were re-
gressed against temperature using least-
squares linear regression analysis (Zar
1984). Extrapolating this linear regression
through the x-axis gave the theoretical
lower developmental threshold base tem-
perature (Arnold 1959). The number of
DDs needed for emergence of 50% of the
larval population was determined by taking
the reciprocal of the slope of the linear
regression line (Campbell et al. 1974).
Standard errors for estimates of 7, and DD
totals were calculated as described by
Campbell et al. (1974). Two ESBM larvae
emerged within 1 d of incubation at 20.9
°C. The emergence rates for these two
larvae were considered outliers and ex-
cluded from linear regression analysis in
order to maintain homogeneity of variance
(Zar 1984).
Phenology of Larval Emergence in
the Field. Prunings infested with overwin-
tered ESBM larvae were collected from the
experimental apple orchard in early March
1992, 1994, and 1996. Collections were
made while apple buds were dormant and
before ESBM larvae had started to crawl
from overwintering hibernaculae. As be-
fore, prunings mainly consisted of fruit-
spur wood and did not include previous
years’ growth. Wood was cut into 30-cm-
length pieces and placed in cylindrical
mesh bags (length = 60 cm, diameter = 25
cm) made from polyester organza and tied
at both ends with string. Each of eight
mesh bags was filled with 30 prunings and
suspended 1.8 m above ground from an
apple tree in the experimental orchard.
Bags were suspended from a branch on the
north side of trees to minimize exposure to
direct sunlight. Each bag was hung from a
separate tree in the lower half of the can-
opy but above the lowest scaffold branch.
No bags were hung in the border row of
trees.
Each day, each pruning was removed
from its bag and tapped sharply on a white
plastic tray to dislodge active larvae. The
inside of each bag was checked for larvae
after which prunings were returned to bags
18 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
and rehung in trees. Numbers of larvae
collected from each bag were recorded,
and the total number collected from all
bags was pooled each day. Bags were
checked until no larvae were counted for
seven consecutive days after the first larva
appeared. The phenology of a sample of
20 fruit buds on McIntosh apple trees in
the study site was recorded every two to
three days. Fruit-bud phenology is de-
scribed by British Columbia Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food (2004).
Instars of Overwintered Larvae.
Head capsule widths of overwintered lar-
vae were measured from prunings col-
lected on 1 March 1992 as part of the dia-
pause termination study, and from prun-
ings used to monitor larval emergence in
the field during 1994 and 1996. Each larva
that emerged from prunings was preserved
in 70% ethanol and its head capsule width
was measured to determine instar (Gilliatt
1932). Gilliatt (1932) did not provide esti-
mates of variation for the head capsule
width of each of the seven larval instars,
therefore, the midpoint between the mean
head capsule width for each successive
instar was used as the range for classifying
each instar.
Temperature Measurement and DD
Accumulation. Hourly air temperatures in
the PARC apple orchard were recorded
throughout the study using a DP-212 data-
pod (Omnidata™, Logan, UT, USA)
housed at l-m height in a Stevenson
screen. Degree-day summations were cal-
culated by fitting a sine wave (Allen 1976,
case 4) to daily air-temperature minima
and maxima using the computer pro-
gramme described by Higley ef al. (1986).
Degree-day summations were calculated in
1992, 1994 and 1996 using all possible
combinations of lower threshold base tem-
peratures consisting of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or
8 °C, and 1 January, February, or March as
dates to start summation. Accumulations
from each start date up to the Julian Day
(JD) on which 50% of the larvae appeared
in the phenology sampling performed
above were calculated. Temperatures <9
°C were chosen as possible base tempera-
tures because the majority of larvae incu-
bated at constant temperatures <8.8 °C in
the laboratory never emerged. No upper
temperature threshold was set. The coeffi-
cient of variation (CV) among these DD
calculations for individual years was calcu-
lated for each combination of base tem-
perature and starting date. The combina-
tion of base temperature and starting date
which gave the lowest CV (Arnold 1959)
was chosen to generate DD summations
that best described the observed cumula-
tive larval emergence in 1992, 1994 and
1996. Cumulative larval emergence data
(1992, 1994, and 1996) was plotted against
these DD summations and a cumulative
Weibull function was fitted to this scatter
plot (McBrien and Judd 1998).
Statistical Analyses. All statistical
analyses were performed with SigmaStat*
(Version 3.0.1, SYSTAT Software Inc.,
Richmond, California, USA) and all ex-
periment-wise error rates were set at a =
0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Diapause Termination. The average
number of days required for ESBM larvae
to appear from prunings incubated at 19 °C
following collection at various dates or
removal from cold storage are shown in
Table 1. Fifty percent of the 74 larvae
coming from prunings collected on 2 Feb-
ruary appeared in 9.7 d, whereas 50% of
the 66 larvae coming from prunings col-
lected on 1 March did so in 6 d. This dif-
ference represents a 38.1% decline in days
to appear following 28 d of field aging. By
comparison, 50% of the 83 larvae coming
from prunings collected on 2 February but
stored at 0.4 °C for this 28-day period, did
so in 8.6 d, representing an 11% decline in
days to appear compared with larvae on
prunings collected 2 February, but immedi-
ately incubated at 19 °C (Table 1).
Knowing when diapause terminates is
critical to construction and application of
any DD model because it establishes a
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
Time needed to emerge (days) at 19 °C for larvae of S. ocellana collected from the field or
removed from laboratory cold storage in February and March 1992.
Collection and
Median emergence time
Mean (+ SD) emergence time
incubation Laboratory Field Laboratory Field
dates stored! collected stored! collected
2 February - 9.7 - 10.8 + 2.3
1 March 8.6 6.0 9042.3 7042.3
'One half of first field collection (2 February) was placed in laboratory cold storage (0.4 °C)
and removed at time of second field collection (1 March)
biologically relevant time at which these
accumulations might start and it ensures
more accurate determination of post-
diapause development times. Whether
overwintering larvae of ESBM undergo
true obligatory diapause (Danks 1987) is
not known nor was it determined because
prunings were collected too late in winter
to investigate this aspect of larval develop-
ment. Those cues that might end diapause
in ESBM are not known, but in temperate
insects there is often a minium time re-
quirement before post-diapause develop-
ment begins (Danks 1987). Whatever cues
are necessary to break diapause in ESBM,
larvae clearly develop in February if tem-
peratures are appropriate. As diapause
progresses or terminates in many species,
observed times for the diapausing life stage
to hatch or emerge often shortens and be-
comes more synchronous (Tauber and
Tauber 1976). Thus, a decline in average
days to appear or emerge during incubation
that begins at different times in winter is
often an outward manifestation of diapause
progression (Judd ef a/. 1993, 1994). Our
observation that average time until larvae
appeared on prunings incubated at 19 °C
after storage at 0.4 °C from 2 February to 1
March, was only 11% shorter than those
incubated at 19 °C on 2 February (Table 1),
suggests most larvae were out of diapause
by 2 February. By comparison, larvae
stored in the field during this same period
appeared sooner when placed at 19 °C on 2
March (Table 1) than on 2 February, indi-
cating they had probably undergone some
post-diapause development in the field.
Therefore, most ESBM larvae probably
complete diapause by 2 February and un-
dergo post-diapause development when
temperatures are above 0.4 °C as they were
in the field at this time of year. Collec-
tively, these data indicate larvae on prun-
ings removed from cold storage after 1
March were suitable for studies on post-
diapause development and 1 February
might be a suitable time to start DD accu-
mulations in the field.
Emergence at Constant Tempera-
tures. The relative frequency of days to
appear for larvae incubated at constant
temperatures between 8.8 and 20.9 °C are
shown in Fig. 1. The median and mean
days to appear are similar at each tempera-
ture indicating that each overall distribu-
tion is approximately normal (Zar 1984).
After 54 d of incubation at 0.4 and 3.8 °C,
only | and 3 larvae had appeared on these
prunings, respectively (Fig. 1). On day 55
these prunings were transferred to 18 °C
and after transfer, 50% of 65 and 33 larvae,
respectively, appeared within 8.7 and 6.2
d. These respective median times were 0.2
and 2.7 d shorter than times taken for 50%
of the larvae incubated at constant 18.0 °C
to appear (Fig. 1). Obviously, there was
little or no development occurring at 0.4
°C, while a 2.7-d shorter median emer-
gence time indicates some development
probably occurred during 54 d of incuba-
tion at 3.8 °C.
Linear Regression-based Emergence
Model. Linear regression (Fig. 2) of the
relationship between emergence rates ()
and temperatures (x) between 8.8 and 20.9
°C (vy = 0.0066 x - 0.0067) provided a rea-
sonable description (7° = 0.57, P < 0.05) of
20 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
8.8 °C
0.25 aaa
0.20 Median = 21.2 d
Mean = 21.8+6.7d
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00 ms
(6) 10 20 30 40
rad)
O
Cc
oh
- 94°C
c 0.25 n= 55
rd) eae
vw 020 Median = 17.5d
(e)
Mean = 18.34+5.4d
a 0.15
Cc
S 0.10
>
= 0.05 !
0)
= 0.00 TL a
as 0 10 20 30 40
r«)
(ad
12.9°C
0.25
n= 76
0.20 Median = 13 d
0.15 Mean = 14+3.7d
0.10
0.05
0.00 i
0 10 20 30 40
15.0 °C
n= 57 0.28
Median = 10.9d 0.20
Mean =12+3.4d
0.15
0.10
0.05
ll 0.00
0 10 20 30 40
16.0°C
n= 58 0.25
Median = 8.9d
edian 0.20
Mean = 10.2+3.2d
0.15
0.10
0.05
ii = 0.00
0 10 20 30 40
20.9 °C
0.25
n= 62
Median = 7.1 d 0.20
Mean =7.4+£1.9d 0.15
Days to emerge
Figure 1. Relative frequency histograms for daily emergence of post-diapause overwintered
larvae of S. ocellana held at various constant temperatures.
the observed emergence data.
Extrapolation of this line to the x-axis
provides a theoretical estimate (1.0 + 0.6
°C) for the lower developmental threshold
(T;). The reciprocal of the slope of this
regression line indicates that half the popu-
lation of ESBM larvae should appear in
154.4 + 6.7 DD; «c.
Phenology of Larval Emergence in
the Field. Fig. 3 shows relative frequency
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
0.15
-
>
O
2
oO
[S)
Cc
oO
oD)
© 0.10
=
o
ie)
wo
®
Q
op)
H |
& 0.05 a
cD)
= | 7
/
4
ra
Pg
7
4
0.00 ~
fe) 5
ZA
15 20 25
Incubation temperature (° C)
Figure 2. Mean (+ SD) emergence rates (solid circles ) of post-diapause overwintered larvae
of S. ocellana at temperatures between 8.8 and 20.9 °C. A least-squares regression line (solid
line) was fitted to individual larval emergence rates and extrapolated (dotted line) to the x-axis
to estimate the base temperature threshold, 7, (1.0 + 0.6 °C).
curves for daily larval emergence each
year. The dates for first emergence ranged
from JD 75 (15 March) in 1992 to JD 96 (5
April) in 1996. Fifty and 100% emergence
occurred between 0 - 14 and 25 - 35 d,
respectively, after the first larva was de-
tected each year. The first ESBM larva
was found in the field when McIntosh ap-
ple trees were at early green-tip stage of
bud development. Fifty and 95% larval
emergence consistently occurred in early,
tight-cluster and late, pink-bud stages, re-
spectively (Table 2). All larvae had
emerged shortly after bloom began. Previ-
ous observations on appearance of over-
wintered ESBM larvae in spring have
noted that larvae begin to emerge soon
after buds begin to open (Gilliatt 1932,
Madsen and Borden 1949, Oatman ef al.
1962).
Instars of Overwintered Larvae.
Among the 66 larvae which appeared on
prunings incubated in the laboratory after
field collection 1 March 1992 (Table 1), 7,
70 and 23% were fourth, fifth, and sixth
instars, respectively. Among the 178 lar-
vae that appeared on prunings during field
observation in 1994, 5, 70 and 25% were
fourth, fifth, and sixth instars, respectively.
The distribution of instars in 1994 was not
significantly different (y° = 0.614, df =2, P
= 0.736) than the distribution of larval in-
stars observed in the laboratory in 1992.
In 1996, 6, 43, and 51% of the 64 larvae
observed on prunings in the field were
fourth, fifth, and sixth instars, respectively.
While the proportion of fourth instars in
1996 was similar to that in 1992 and 1994,
the overall distribution of instars in 1996
was significantly different from 1992 (y° =
11.778, df = 2, P < 0.003) and 1994 (x? =
16.677, df = 2, P < 0.001) because of a
greater percentage of sixth instars in 1996.
In 1994, 50% of fourth, fifth, and sixth
instars appeared in the field by JD 97, 101,
and 102, respectively; in 1996 they oc-
curred on JD 106, 108, and 102, respec-
tively. When all larval instars are consid-
ered together 50% appeared by JD 100 in
1994, and JD 106 in 1996 (Table 2, Fig. 3).
ESBM has seven larval instars, and on
apple, larvae reportedly overwinter in the
fifth instar (Gilliatt 1932, LeRoux and
Reimer 1959, MacLellan 1978). However,
Gilliatt (1932) observed that some larvae
also overwinter in the fourth and sixth in-
27 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
1992
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
=
= 1994
OG 015
o))
<
ro)
|
®
= 0.10
ro)
c
oO
Ss 0.05 -
Q
o
oO
0.00 7
1996
0.05
0.00 —
~
oO
~S
on
}
}
© |
° |
co
oO
95 100 105 110 115 120 125
Julian date
Figure 3. Percent of overwintered larvae of S. ocellana emerging daily in 1992, 1994, and
1996. Total larvae emerged in 1992, 1994, and 1996 were 105, 178, and 64, respectively.
stars. Oatman ef al. (1962) reported that
on sour cherry ESBM larvae entered hiber-
naculae in autumn as third instars and then
moulted sometime before appearing in
spring. According to Borden and Madsen
(1949), on prune ESBM larvae began to
construct hibernaculae as fourth instars but
moulted during this process, and overwin-
tered as fifth instars. While the present
study supports the findings of Gilliatt
(1932), because no measures of variation
for the mean head capsule widths used to
categorize larvae have been provided by
any study, it is currently impossible to at-
tach complete certainty to any of these
results.
Validating the Linear Regression-
based Emergence Model. Using our lin-
ear regression model (Fig. 2), a 1 °C base
temperature, and 1 March to start DD ac-
cumulations, 50% of ESBM larvae were
predicted to appear by JD 87, 90 and 100
in 1992, 1994, and 1996, respectively.
Predicted dates for 50% emergence were 4,
10, and 6 d early, respectively (Table 2).
The mean (+ SD) error between predicted
and observed dates of 50% emergence was
-6.7 + 3.1 d. The number of DD; :c accu-
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 23
Table 2.
Relationship between specific observed cumulative percentiles of emergence of overwintered
S. ocellana larvae, fruit-bud phenology of McIntosh apple trees and degree-day accumulations
above 1 °C (DD)»c) starting 1 March in 1992, 1994, and 1996.
Cumulative : Percentage of fruit buds at
Julian 1
emergence Year ante DD, °c each development stage
percentile Green tip Tight cluster Pink Blossom
1992 qi. 93.2 100
5% 1994 90 151.8 100
1996 98 140.7 100
1992 91 177.0 90 10
50% 1994 100 226.8 90 10
1996 =106 209.5 95 5
1992 106 OSie) 100
95% 1994 111 339.0 100
1996 115 276.3 10 90
1992 110 329.4 90 10
100% 1994 114 368.3 95 5
1996 121 320.1 70 30
'Percentage based on 20 fruit buds. Fruit-bud phenology based on B.C. Ministry of Agricul-
ture, Fisheries, and Food Tree Fruit Production Guide (1996)
mulating after 1 March to various percen-
tiles of observed emergence of larvae in
the field were calculated and shown to be
equally variable to 50% emergence (Table
2). Clearly our laboratory-derived linear
development model predicted median lar-
val emergence about 20% too early. This
deviance may arise because development
of ESBM larvae in spring may not be
solely related to temperature in the same
way life stages like eggs or pupae appear
to be (McBrien and Judd 1998). Alterna-
tively, overwintering larvae may have tem-
perature thresholds for movement or feed-
ing activity higher than the 7, we calcu-
lated from regression analysis (Fig. 2). If
this were the case, overwintering larvae
may have completed diapause or post-
diapause development by the dates pre-
dicted by the regression model, but if tem-
peratures were too low for them to move or
feed they may not have appeared on prun-
ings until temperatures were suitable. Ac-
cumulating DD before 1 March, when dia-
pause was likely over (Table 1), would
only have made the errors of prediction
greater, thus it seems a base temperature of
1 °C may be incorrect for predicting larval
activity in spring.
Observed DD Accumulations. The
CV associated with each observed DD
summation calculated using all possible
combinations of three starting dates (1
January, February or March) and 7; (1 - 8
°C) to describe observed 50% emergence
in the field is shown in Fig. 4. The lowest
CV for this one event was obtained with a
starting date of 1 January and 7; of 6 °C
(Fig. 4). This 7; is not unlike that of two
sympatric species of leafroller in the Pa-
cific Northwest, Pandemis pyrusana Kear-
foot and Choristoneura rosaceana Walker,
that have a 7; of =5 °C (Brunner 1991) and
emerge in spring after overwintering as
second- or third-instar larvae. The empiri-
cally-derived CV-based approach gave a
mean of 82.7 + 3.5 DDe-c from | January
to 50% emergence, with a CV of 4.3 (Fig.
4), whereas the mean number of DDjȢ
from 1 March to 50% emergence was
24 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
15 = sles ae .
] . =
Cc
Ao)
wo
:
2 v
a) o
im)
5 Vv
Cc
O
ow iz
o
>
ro)
Go 5
2
bh on
o
S
v 1 January
6)
1 2 3
|
|
|_|
|] |
v |
|
Vv
Vv
v
1 February | 1 March
5 6 7 8
Lower developmental base temperature (°C)
Figure 4. Coefficients of variation associated with three-year average (1992, 1994, and 1996)
degree-day summations from various starting dates (1 January, 1 February, and 1 March) to
50% observed emergence of overwintered larvae of S. oce/lana using different lower base tem-
peratures between | and 8 °C.
204.4 + 25.3 and more variable with a CV
of 12.4 (Fig. 4). To provide a methodol-
ogy for calculating DD¢-c indices associ-
ated with any percentile of observed emer-
gence in the field we plotted observed cu-
mulative larval emergence against DD6ec
accumulations after 1 January and a cumu-
lative Weibull function accurately de-
scribed (R? = 0.89, P < 0.05) this relation-
ship (Fig. 5). It should be noted that, al-
though this Weibull function described
observed emergence with less variation
than the laboratory-derived linear regres-
sion and | °C T;, (Table 2), the accuracy
with which this empirically-derived
nonlinear equation can predict future
events needs to be validated with inde-
pendent data. The difference between a 7;,
derived using this empirical approach and
the laboratory-derived DD model may be
explained partly by the difference in han-
dling of the prunings used to monitor lar-
val emergence in the laboratory at constant
temperatures and to monitor emergence in
the field. In the laboratory, prunings were
stored at 0.4 °C in total darkness for ca. 3
mo while prunings used to monitor emer-
gence in the field were removed from trees
ca. 10 d before larval emergence began
naturally. Factors besides thermal summa-
tions, such as light, chill units, or moisture
which trigger flower bud development,
may also determine when overwintering
ESBM larvae emerge. Any potentially
unknown factors that affect emergence are
inherently incorporated within any empiri-
cal model even if they are not understood.
For whatever reason, our data suggest a
developmental model generated from labo-
ratory data only, may not be suitable for
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
100 —
ap) =
c 75
O) ps
cD) ‘2
&
(ad) =
Cc _
®
O 50 —
ro)
(ok
cD)
>
i
=
25 -
O - ry,
0
25 50 res)
Best fitting nonlinear
Weibull function
100 125 150 175
Degree-day summations above 6 °C starting 1 January
Figure 5. Observed cumulative percent emergence of overwintered larvae of S. ocellana in
1992, 1994, and 1996 (data points). Solid line is best fitting (P < 0.05) cumulative Weibull
function (¥ = 100 x (1 - e “’”’)?* used to describe emergence where x = DDgvc after 1
January.
describing processes which trigger activity
of ESBM larvae during winter and their
appearance in spring. On the other hand
DD indices generated from observed field
data may prove useful in management of
ESBM (Fig. 5).
Phenology Models and Management
of ESBM. Median emergence of ESBM
larvae appeared to be closely linked to
fruit-bud phenology of McIntosh apple
trees (Table 2), occurring consistently at
the early, tight-cluster stage of fruit-bud
development. Currently, conventional
insecticide applications at tight cluster,
pink, or petal fall, or applications of Bacil-
lus thuringiensis (Berliner) at full bloom
which target leafrollers, are recommended
as indirect controls for ESBM in spring
(British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture,
Fisheries, and Food, 2004). The latter con-
trol is one most commonly used by organic
producers in the Okanagan and Simil-
kameen Valleys (Judd unpublished data).
During this study, emergence of ESBM
larvae was complete by early bloom,
which is very likely too late for control
because most larvae enclose themselves
within feeding shelters made from blos-
soms. Our observations indicate applica-
tion of residual insecticides to McIntosh
apples at the pink stage would have
reached 90 - 100% of the larvae (Table 2),
well before they enclose themselves in
feeding shelters. This is consistent with
observations by Madsen and Downing
(1968) that azinphosmethyl applied to
McIntosh apples in the early pink stage
provided good control of ESBM in spring.
However, recommendations to spray at
pink of McIntosh would not necessarily be
appropriate on apple varieties that flower
at different dates, which is a common oc-
26 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
currence 1n montane growing regions.
A temperature-based model that can
consistently predict 90 - 100% emergence
of overwintering ESBM larvae, independ-
ent of flowering dates, should have greater
application to different apple varieties,
years, regions and to host plants other than
apple. While this study has not yet pro-
vided that model, if the equation given in
Fig. 5 can be validated with independent
data then it may be useful in predicting any
percentile of larval emergence in spring
that is deemed necessary for control pur-
poses. Such an equation and models of
adult emergence, flight, and oviposition
during summer combined with a phero-
mone-based monitoring program (McBrien
and Judd 1998), may provide a more spe-
cific management programme for ESBM.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank G. Zilahi-Balogh, D. Benson,
T. Hansford for technical assistance, and
the following for financial support: Natural
Sciences and Engineering Council of Can-
ada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,
Science Council of British Columbia, Brit-
Okanagan Valley Tree Fruit Authority,
Okanagan Similkameen Cooperative
Growers’ Association, British Columbia
Fruit Packers’ Cooperative, Similkameen
Okanagan Organic Producers’ Association,
and Phero Tech Inc.
ish Columbia Fruit Growers’ Association,
REFERENCES
Allen, J.C. 1976. A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environmental Entomology
5: 388-396.
Arnold, C.Y. 1959. The determination and significance of the base temperature in a heat unit system.
Proceedings of American Horticultural Science 74: 430-445.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1996. Tree fruit production guide for com-
mercial growers: interior districts. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,
Victoria, B.C.
British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 2004. Tree fruit production guide for com-
mercial growers: interior districts. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,
Victoria, B.C.
Brunner, J.F. 1991. Leafroller pests of fruit crops in Washington State, pp. 185-197. Jn K. Williams (ed.),
New directions in tree fruit pest management. Good Fruit Grower, Yakima. WA.
Campbell, A., B.D. Fraser, N. Gilbert, A.P. Gutierrez, and M. Mackauer. 1974. Temperature require-
ments of some aphids and their parasites. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 431-438.
Danks, H.V. 1987. Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. Biological Survey and Canadian Mono-
graph Series 1. The Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Deventer, van P., A.K. Minks, L.H.M. Blommers, U. Neumann, and K. Jilderda. 1992. Mating disruption
utilizing lepidopterous sex pheromones: Three years testing in apple orchards in The Netherlands.
Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Pests and Diseases 3: 1193-1198.
Dyck, V.A. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 1992. Sterile-insect release program to control the codling moth Cydia
pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in British Columbia, Canada. Acta Phytopathologica et
Entomologica Hungarica 27: 219-222.
Gillespie, D.R. 1985. Impact of feeding by Lepidoptera larvae on the production of highbush blueberry in
the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist 117: 949-953.
Gilliatt, F.C. 1932. Four years’ observations on the eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocellana D. and S.,
in Nova Scotia. Scientific Agriculture 12: 357-371.
Higley, L.G., L.P. Pedigo, and K.R. Ostlie. 1986. DEGDAY: a program for calculating degree-days, and
assumptions behind the degree-day approach. Environmental Entomology 15: 999-1016.
Judd, G.J.R. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 2004. Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication and
mating in Cydia pomonella, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) using Isomate-CM/LR in apple orchards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Colum-
bia 101: 3-14.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1993. Temperature-dependent development and pre-
diction of hatch in overwintered eggs of the fruittree leafroller, Archips argyrospilus (Walker)
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 27
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 125: 945-956.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1996. Commercial trials of pheromone-mediated
mating disruption with Isomate-C* to control codling moth in British Columbia apple and pear or-
chards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 93: 23-34.
Judd, G.J.R., J.E. Cossentine, M.G.T Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1994. Temperature-dependent devel-
opment of the speckled green fruitworm, Orthosia hibisci Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The
Canadian Entomologist 126: 1263-1275.
Leroux, J. and C. Reimer. 1959. Variation between samples of immature stages, and of mortalities from
some factors, of the eye-spotted bud moth, Spi/onota ocellana (D. and S.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreuti-
dae), and the pistol casebearer, Coleophora serratella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae), on apple in
Quebec. The Canadian Entomologist 61: 428-449.
MacLellan, C.R. 1978. Trends of eye-spotted bud moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) populations over 12
years on two cultivars in an insecticide free orchard. The Canadian Entomologist 110: 91-100.
Madsen, H.F. and A.D. Borden. 1949. The eye-spotted bud moth on prune in California. Journal of Eco-
nomic Entomology 42: 915-920.
Madsen, H.F. and R.S. Downing. 1968. Integrated control of the fruit-tree leaf roller, Archips argyrospilus
(Walker) and the eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocellana (Denis and Schiffermiiller). Journal of
the Entomological Society of British Columbia 65: 19-21.
McBrien, H.L. and G.J.R. Judd. 1998. Forecasting emergence, flight, and oviposition of Spilonota ocel-
lana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in British Columbia. Environmental Entomology 27:1411-1417.
Oatman, E.R., E.F. Legner, and R.F. Brooks. 1962. Bionomics of the eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota
ocellana, on cherry in Wisconsin. Journal of Economic Entomology 55: 930-934.
Tauber, M.T. and C.A. Tauber. 1976. Insect seasonality: diapause maintenance, termination, and postdia-
pause development. Annual Review of Entomology 21: 81-107.
Weires, R. and H. Riedl. 1991. Other tortricids on pome and stone fruits, North American species, pp.
413-434. In L.P.S. van der Geest and H.H. Evenhuis (eds.), Tortricid Pests, Their Biology, Natural
Enemies, and Control. Elsevier, New York.
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, Second Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
28
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 29
Seasonal variation in recapture of mass-reared sterile
codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae): implications for control by sterile insect
technique in British Columbia
GARY J.R. JUDD', MARK G.T. GARDINER’ and HOWARD M.A.
THISTLEWOOD"”
ABSTRACT
In 1992, the Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release (SIR) Programme was initiated
to eradicate codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), from montane, fruit-growing valleys in
British Columbia (BC), Canada. Excessive damage in 1994, and failures to maintain
sterile:wild (S:W) over- flooding moth ratios at 40:1, a target deemed necessary for
eradication, led to concern about activity of sterile moths and recommendations to sup-
plement control in spring. Using pheromone-baited wing traps and passive sticky pane
traps we monitored operational S:W ratios to determine if they continued to fall below
40:1 post-1994. Seasonal flight activity and recapture of sterile moths was compared
with that of wild moths from 7 May - 1 September, 1995 - 1999, in nine commercial
orchards in Cawston, BC. Mean weekly catches of wild males in pheromone traps, re-
flected first- (May) and second-generation (August) peaks of flight activity in orchards
supplemented with pheromone disruption, but only a single period of activity in insecti-
cide-supplemented orchards. Weekly catches of sterile moths in these same orchards
were always at their lowest in spring, and activity was correlated with seasonal air tem-
peratures. Yearly average S:W ratios in the insecticide-treated orchards ranged from
24:1 - 203:1 in 1995 - 1997. Examining S:W ratios using data from those weeks when
wild moths were actually caught, indicates ratios were frequently (29 - 91%) less than
40:1 in spring but S:W ratios fell below 40:1 less often during summer than spring.
Passive pane traps also revealed patterns of fewer sterile moth catches, and lower S:W
ratios in spring, compared with summer. Our data suggest low overflooding ratios con-
tributed to slower than predicted population reductions, and increased release of sterile
moths, of improved quality, between 1995 and 1997 did not significantly increase mean
weekly catches or S:W ratios in individual orchards in spring. Therefore, continued
application of supplemental insecticides, or a pheromone disruption treatment that re-
duced catch of moths, but did not significantly affect S:W ratios in spring, is recom-
mended. We conclude that similar analysis of trap data for the entire SIR Programme
(1994 - 2004) and correlations with damage would provide recommendations for the
best use of sterile insects as part of any future area-wide codling moth management pro-
gramme.
Key Words: Codling moth, sterile insect technique, flight activity, sterile:wild ratios
INTRODUCTION
In 1992, the British Columbia Fruit dollar Sterile Insect Release (SIR) Pro-
Growers’ Association and Regional Dis- gramme in the Creston, Okanagan and
trict governments launched a multimillion Similkameen Valleys of British Columbia
' Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, 4200 Hwy 97, Summerland,
British Columbia, Canada VOH 1Z0
* Formerly: Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Board, 9848 Aberdeen Rd., Coldstream, B.C.,
Canada V1B 2K9
30 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
(BC), Canada with an objective to eradi-
cate codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.),
from these montane, fruit-growing valleys
by 2000 (Dyck and Gardiner 1992). This
area-wide programme was the culmination
of 30 years of basic research, small imple-
mentation trials and much planning
(Proverbs 1971, 1982; Proverbs ef al.
1966, 1977, 1982; Dyck et al. 1993).
Originally the programme was divided
into three distinct phases: 1) Pre-release
Sanitation, 2) Sterile Moth Release, and 3)
Surveillance Monitoring and Protection.
During Phase 1 growers were required to
reduce wild codling moth populations to
levels resulting in 0.1 - 0.3 % damage at
harvest, considered equivalent to about 100
overwintering larvae per ha (Dyck ef al.
1993). Operationally, it was anticipated
these measures would equate to adult
populations of no more than two wild
moths per pheromone trap per week during
periods of peak emergence (Bloem and
Bloem 2000). In Phase 2, the programme
would make weekly releases of sterile
moths in all commercial orchards in order
to maintain sterile:wild (S:W) overflooding
moth ratios at 40:1, a target that extensive
research demonstrated was necessary to
eradicate populations in three years
(Proverbs 1971, 1982; Proverbs ef al.
1982). In Phase 3, an area-wide phero-
mone trapping programme would be 1m-
plemented post-2000 to prevent reinfesta-
tion of pest-free areas through early detec-
tion and targeted controls. These three
phases were to be implemented sequen-
tially in each of two zones. Zone 1, which
included the Okanagan from Osoyoos to
Summerland, Similkameen and Creston
Valleys, entered Phase 1 in 1992 and was
to recieve sterile moths under Phase 2 from
1994 - 1996. Zone 2 from Peachland to
Salmon Arm inclusive, was scheduled to
enter Phase | in 1995 and receive moths
from 1997 - 1999 (Dyck et al. 1993).
Following a two-year pre-release sani-
tation programme in Zone |, the first ster-
ile moths were released in May 1994. Al-
most immediately it was noted that weekly
S:W ratios from pheromone trap catches in
individual orchards were less than the 40:1
target. Unfortunately, in previous sterile
insect implementation trials in BC
(Proverbs 1982; Proverbs ef al. 1966,
1977, 1982; ), codling moth S:W ratios
were almost always presented as averages
for regions, generations or seasons. These
coarse-grained values made it difficult to
know what ratios should be expected on a
weekly basis in individual orchards and
whether there should be concern for the
long-term control effort. In this regard,
similar implementation trials in Washing-
ton state (White et al. 1976) showed that
S:W ratios within a single 130-ha orchard
ranged from 54:1 to 938:1 when all traps
were averaged over the season, but when
examined individually, 21 of 38 total traps
showed at least one weekly ratio that was
less than 20:1. Furthermore, 78% of all
codling moth damage was found within
152 m of these 21 traps. Therefore, to
achieve area-wide population reduction
and suppression of codling moth in a fruit-
growing region like BC, where there are
numerous, small, noncontiguous orchards,
it is important to maintain appropriate S:W
ratios in individual orchards and traps,
especially during periods of peak emer-
gence of wild moths. Any critical assess-
ment of the annual progress or success of a
sterile insect programme in BC should be
based on an analysis that reveals the extent
to which appropriate S:W ratios are being
achieved in individual sites and presented
as a proportion of all orchards being
treated.
Our original objectives in this study
were to document operational S:W ratios
in several orchards in an effort to deter-
mine whether they were falling below the
40:1 target after 1994, and if so, to deter-
mine the extent to which inadequate ratios
were resulting from large wild populations,
thus justifying need for supplemental con-
trols, or were resulting from poor recapture
of sterile moths. A further rationale in
publishing these data now, is that these
data and analyses of this type are needed to
make objective decisions about the design
of a sustainable area-wide codling moth
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
control programme post-2005 (Dendy ef
al. 2001). Our analyses may be useful in
making decisions on the best uses of sterile
Sl
codling moths in BC and other parts of the
world where application of this technique
is currently being considered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test Sites and Sterile Insect Delivery.
Studies were carried out in four conven-
tionally- and five organically-managed
apple orchards in Cawston, BC, located in
the Similkameen Valley, within Zone 1 of
the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme
(Dyck et al. 1993). Orchards ranged in
size from | - 3 ha and were composed of
mixed ‘McIntosh’, ‘Spartan’, ‘Delicious’
and ‘Golden Delicious’ apple varieties
planted at densities of 600 - 900 trees / ha
with tree x row spacings of 2.4 - 4.6 x 4.6 -
5.5 m, respectively. Orchards were chosen
because of their known history (Judd ef ai.
1996, 1997) and because they were part of
the original sterile insect implementation
trials conducted by Proverbs et al. (1982).
While our trials were being conducted,
conventional growers were asked to apply
insecticidal controls during flight of first-
generation adult codling moths in May and
June, which most growers did in 1995 -
1997 (Bloem and Bloem 2000). Organic
growers did not apply insecticides, but
they supplemented release of sterile males
by applying Isomate-C and Isomate CM/
LR (Pacific Biocontrol Corp., Vancouver,
Washington, USA) in 1995 - 1996 and
1997 - 1999, respectively, at a rate of 500 -
1000 dispensers / ha, as pheromone treat-
ments to disrupt mating of wild codling
moths (Judd et al. 1996, 1997; Judd and
Gardiner 2004). Pheromone treatment was
required because organic growers did not
want to lose certification by applying con-
ventional insecticides. This application
presented an opportunity to determine
what impact a pheromone-based mating-
disruption treatment might have on flight
activity of sterile moths and S:W ratios.
The original plan was to deliver 1000
mixed-sex sterile codling moths in each ha
of orchard two times each week (Dyck ef
al. 1993). However, Bloem and Bloem
(2000) stated that on average orchards
were receiving 2250 moths / ha / week in
1994, and as many as 3750 moths / ha /
week in 1997, although it is not clear
whether these numbers refer to mixed-sex
moths, or males only. Exactly how many
sterile moths reached our study orchards is
unknown, but all orchards were visited
twice weekly by the same release drivers
throughout each year and therefore, should
have received similar numbers of moths.
Beginning in late April or early May and
continuing until mid-September, moths
were distributed in every fifth or ninth row
of orchard approximately 25 - 30 m apart.
Chilled moths irradiated as described by
Bloem and Bloem (2000) were dispensed
by gently blowing them onto the ground
beneath trees from a small hopper and fan
unit (McMechan and Proverbs 1972)
mounted on the front end of an all-terrain
vehicle (Bloem and Bloem 2000).
Monitoring Codling Moth Seasonal
Flight Activity. From 1995 through 1999,
seasonal flight activity and capture of ster-
ile and wild male codling moths was as-
sessed using pheromone-baited traps. Two
to six Pherocon 1-CP style, sticky wing
traps (Phero Tech Inc., Delta, BC) baited
with the codling moth sex pheromone
codlemone, (£,E£)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol
(99% isomerically pure, Shin-etsu, Fine
Chemicals Division, Tokyo, Japan) were
used in each orchard. A minimum of two
traps and a maximum of two traps per ha
were used in each orchard. Traps were
hung ca. 1.5 - 2.0 m above ground near the
centre of each orchard on 7 or 8 May
(Julian Day 128) and were checked weekly
until 1 September. Trap positions re-
mained fixed within orchards across sea-
sons. Trap bottoms were replaced weekly
and pheromone baits were changed every
third week. Sterile codling moths were
identified by an internal red dye seques-
tered from the artificial diet on which they
a0 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
were reared (Brinton ef al. 1969).
All pheromone lures were prepared by
dispensing a 200 ul solution of codlemone
dissolved in dichloromethane solvent into
wells of red rubber septa (Aldrich Chemi-
cal Company Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
USA). After loading, septa were air dried
for 18 h at 23 °C in a fume hood and stored
at 0 °C until pinned to the inner side of trap
lids in the field. Septa used in conven-
tional orchards were loaded with 1 mg of
codlemone and septa used in pheromone-
treated orchards were loaded with 10 mg
of codlemone because the former are less
attractive in Isomate-treated orchards (Judd
et al. 1996).
In 1996, catches of sterile and wild,
male and female codling moths were also
monitored using passive pane _ traps
(Weissling and Knight 1994) to measure
relative activity of sterile and wild moths
independent of response to pheromone
lures. Pane traps consisted of vertically-
oriented, semirigid, clear acetate plastic
squares (30 x 30 cm) that were coated with
STP oil treatment (First Brands Corpora-
tion, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada) to
capture alighting insects. Sticky panes
were clamped 3 m above ground to an up-
right iron rod abutting tree trunks. Eight to
30 pane traps were deployed evenly in a
grid pattern throughout each orchard. Due
to their cumbersome nature and need for
frequent maintenance, pane traps were
only used in 1996 and were placed in the
field every other week, and only for a
three-day sampling interval,
through Thursday.
Orchard Temperatures. Hourly air
temperatures throughout this study were
recorded at a centrally-located orchard in
Cawston, BC from 1 May through 1 Sep-
tember each year. Temperature readings
were made using a two-channel DP-212
Datapod (OmniData™, Logan, Utah,
USA) housed in a 1 m_ high Stevenson
screen. Daily degree-day (DD) summa-
tions above a 10 °C developmental base
temperature and below a 31 °C upper de-
velopmental threshold were calculated by
fitting a sine wave (Allen 1976; case 4) to
daily air temperature minima and maxima
using the computer program described by
Higley et al. (1986).
Data Analyses. Codling moth catches
in all traps within an orchard were summed
each week. Median catches per trap per
orchard in each generation and year were
compared using a Kruskal Wallis non-
parametric analysis of variance followed
by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for
ranked data (Zar 1984). Some paired fre-
quency data were analyzed using Fisher’s
exact test and y° tests where appropriate.
Regression analyses was used to relate
weekly and seasonal catches to tempera-
ture. All statistical tests were performed
using SigmaStat® (Version 3.0.1, SYSTAT
Software Inc., Richmond, California,
USA) and an experimental error rate of a =
0.05.
Tuesday
RESULTS
Flight Activity of Wild Moths. Mean
weekly catches of wild codling moths in
conventional insecticide-treated orchards
in 1995 - 1999 peaked at 12, 4.5, 0.75, 0.4
and 0.2 moths / trap / week during the first
four weeks of each trapping season, re-
spectively (Fig. 1A). Catches of wild
moths in insecticide-treated orchards were
always lower in the second half of the sea-
son (Fig. 1A) and near zero after 1996.
Catches of early-season, first-generation
wild moths however continued into 1999
(Fig. 1A). After 1996, catches of wild
moths in insecticide-treated orchards never
went above the anticipated maximum
threshold of 2 wild moths / trap / week,
and during the five-year monitoring period
they were less than this threshold 97.5% of
the time.
In contrast to insecticide-treated or-
chards, trap-catch curves in pheromone-
treated orchards reflected both first- and
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
second-generation peaks of wild moth
flight activity in 1995 and 1996 (Fig. 1B).
Total catches in the second half of 1995
were even greater than the first half. How-
ever, after 1996, catches of wild codling
moths were extremely low under phero-
mone-treatment and no wild moths were
caught in any pheromone-treated orchard
in 1999 (Fig. 1B).
Flight Activity of Sterile Moths. <A
plot of mean + standard error (SE) weekly
catches of sterile moths from 1995 - 1999
in conventional insecticide-treated or-
chards reveals a pattern of low catches
during the early season and increasing
catches later in the season (Fig. 2). Mean
8
Mean Number of Wild Moths Caught / Trap / Week
12
rs
Pheromone-treated |
33
catches of sterile moths in the first two
weeks of the season (Fig. 2) were often
below the 40 moths / trap / week needed to
ensure a 40:1 S:W ratio if only a single
wild moth were caught. On average, it was
not until week 8 that catches were consis-
tently greater than 80 moths / trap / week
needed to ensure a 40:1 S:W ratio if the
programme threshold of 2 wild moths /
week were reached. There was a signifi-
cant linear ( r 7 = 0.87, P < 0.05) increase
in weekly catches of sterile males in weeks
1 - 8, but catches over the entire season
were described more accurately ( R° =
0.93, P< 0.05) by a sigmoid curve (Fig. 2).
Increasing catches in weeks | - 8 were
Figure 1. Mean weekly catches of wild male codling moths in pheromone-baited wing traps in
insecticide-treated conventional (A) and pheromone-treated organic (B) apple orchards under
management of the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme from 1995 - 1999, in Cawston, BC.
n= 4 conventional and 5 organic orchards and 2 - 6 traps / orchard.
34 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
o
®
=
e:
oO
|
ke
~ 200
=
oO)
a=]
iq]
oO
2 160
@)
=
Oo
ia?)
= 120
a)
9
an
eee
80
ad}
Q
=
3
Z
Ww 40
7)
+H
Cc
©
®
= 0
Insecticide-treated ®
Pheromone-treated
160
120
8 10 12 14 16
Weeks
Figure 2. Comparison of mean (+ SE) weekly catches of sterile male codling moths in phero-
mone-baited wing traps in insecticide-treated conventional (bars) and pheromone-treated or-
ganic (dots) apple orchards under management of the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme
from 1995 - 1999, in Cawston, BC. Curves represent nonlinear regression lines fitted to mean
catches in insecticide- (124.7 / [1 + e ~°~7/')) and pheromone-treated orchards (32.2 / [1 +
e —(x - 7.72) / aly
correlated ( r = 0.661, P < 0.05) with con-
current seasonal increases in mean weekly
temperatures.
Although weekly catches of sterile
moths in pheromone-treated orchards were
reduced significantly (ca. 78%) over
catches in insecticide-treated orchards,
they revealed a similar pattern of low early
season catches that increased as the season
progressed (Fig. 2). Catches of sterile
males regularly reached as many as 40
moths / trap / week after week 9. Again,
while there was a significant linear ( r * =
0.641, P < 0.05 ) increase in catches of
sterile males in pheromone-treated or-
chards during weeks | - 8, catches over the
entire season were better described ( R ? =
0.83, P< 0.05) by a sigmoid curve (Fig. 2).
The median number of sterile moths
caught in conventional orchards varied less
among years than between generations
within years (Table. 1). There was no sig-
nificant difference (Dunn’s test a = 0.05)
in the median number of sterile moths
caught during weeks 1 - 8 in 1995, 1996,
1997 and 1999 (Table. 1). In 1998 how-
ever, significantly more sterile moths were
caught, mean temperatures were higher,
and more DDjo°-c accumulated during the
first eight weeks of the season than any
other year (Table 1). In each of the five
years, median trap catches in weeks | - 8
(first generation) were less than median
catches in weeks 9 - 16 (second genera-
tion). In each year, the ratios of second-
generation to first-generation median trap
catches were significantly (P < 0.05) dif-
ferent than an expected 1:1 ratio under a
null hypothesis of equal probabilities of
catch (Table 1), and over five years sterile
moths were 3.9-fold more likely to be
caught in second than in first generation.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 35
Table 1.
Median number of sterile male codling moths caught per trap per week and degree-day (DD)
accumulations during first- and second-generation wild moth flight activity and median yearly
catches and sterile:wild (S:W) overflooding moth ratios in four insecticide-treated conventional
apple orchards receiving sterile codling moths under management of the Okanagan-Kootenay
SIR Programme, in Cawston, BC, 1995 - 1999.
Adult generation!”
: Sse ety Median Yearly S:W
y First Second trap catch | flood
car (weeks 1-8) —__ (weeks 9 - 16 ratios? er ae ng
10S
Catch DD orc Catch DDo°c Second / First
1995 27.4a 463 53.2a 584 1.9 * 40.3a 24
1996 42.7a 339 175.1 b 674 4.1% 108.9b 139
1997 37.9a 427 72.0 a 611 1.9 * 56.4a 203
1998 112.9b 512 204.9 b 757 1.8 * 158.9b 794
1999 65.3a 374 168.5 b 653 2.6 * 116.9b 213
1995-1999 42.7 423 168.1 656 3.9 * 108.9 287
'Trap-catch medians for a generation within a column followed by different letters are signifi-
cantly different (Dunn’s test a = 0.05) following a significant (P < 0.05) Kruskal-Wallis Test.
> DDyoxc totals above 10 °C accumulated for first generation from Julian Day 128 - 184 and for
second generation from Julian Day 185 - 241.
* Asterisks indicate trap-catch ratios are significantly different (P < 0.05) from 1:1 by a’ test
on actual trap catches.
Sterile: Wild Moth Ratios. S:W ratios
presented as yearly averages for all or-
chards suggest overflooding ratios were
well above 40:1 in all years except 1995
(Table 1), steadily increasing from 1995 -
1998. However, restricting analysis of
S:W ratios in the insecticide-treated or-
chards to those weeks when wild moths
were actually caught (Table 2), indicates
ratios during the first eight weeks of the
season were less than 40:1, 91% of the
time in 1995 (21 of 23 orchard-weeks),
60% in 1996 (9 of 15 orchard-weeks), and
29% in 1997 (2 of 7 orchard-weeks).
Closer examination of S:W ratios in these
orchards shows that during the first four
weeks of the trapping season, when wild
catches peaked (Fig. 1A), S:W ratios never
reached 40:1 in 1995, did so once in 1996
and only twice in 1997. In one of the three
orchards where wild moths were caught in
1998 (Table 2), S:W ratios fell below 40:1
in both weeks this occurred. It was not
until 1999, when wild catches were near
zero (Fig. 1A), that a 40:1 S:W ratio was
achieved in all orchards during the first
eight weeks of the season (Table 2). Simi-
lar analysis performed in the second half of
the season indicates S:W ratios fell below
40:1 about 39% of the time over the five
years (9 of 23 orchard weeks), which was
significantly less often than during the first
eight weeks (Table 2).
S:W ratios in pheromone-treated or-
chards were only analyzed for 1995 and
1996 because few or no wild moths were
caught in these orchards in 1997 - 1999
(Fig. 1B). In spite of yearly reductions
(4.5-fold) in catches of sterile moths in
pheromone-treated relative to insecticide-
treated orchards (Fig. 2), S:W ratios during
the first eight weeks of 1995 were similar
in both sets of orchards (Fig. 3A-B). This
similarity was surprising because in most
weeks, wild catches were greater in phero-
mone- than in insecticide-treated orchards
where wild catches went above 2 moths /
trap / week only once. While S:W ratios in
pheromone-treated orchards never went
above 40:1 during flight of first-generation
36
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 2.
Frequency of weeks during the first (weeks | - 8) and second generation (weeks 9 - 16) of wild
codling moths when sterile:wild ratios in pheromone-trap catches were less than 40:1
(numerators) for those weeks when wild moths were caught (denominators) in each of four
insecticide-treated conventional orchards receiving sterile codling moths under management of
the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme, in Cawston, BC, 1995 - 1999.
Adult Orchards Yearly Fisher’s
Year Boece frequency Exact Test
8 I - 3 4 totals P-value!
ist 5/5 7/8 5/5 4/5 98
12) gnd 1/2 3/6 1/2 3/4 8/14 0.0345
is 2/2 1/5 2/3 4/5 9/15
1996 and 0/1 1/4 0/0 0/4 1/ 9 0.0333
607 ist 0/0 2/4 0/1 0/2 DP
and 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/ 0 ~
ook ist 0/0 0/3 2/2 0/2 oe ee
and 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/ 0 =
a6 1st 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/ 0
and 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/ 0 :
Orchard ist FIR. A0s20 9/11 8/14 34/52 re
totals gnd 1/3. + +4/10 if 2 3/ 8 9/23
'Fisher’s Exact Test (2 x 2 contingency table) of the null hypothesis of equal frequencies in
each generation during which the sterile:wild ratios are < 40:1 using yearly frequency totals
from all orchards. ns = P > 0.05
wild moths in 1995 (Fig. 3B), they were
only marginally better in the insecticide-
treated orchards where ratios reached 40:1
once (Fig. 3A). Note however, this one
occurrence was in the week when wild
moths were near their lowest, and followed
a week when catches of wild moths peaked
but catches of sterile moths inexplicably
dipped (Fig. 3A). S:W ratios in phero-
mone-treated orchards fell below 40:1
most of the second half of 1995 (Fig. 3B)
because catches of wild moths increased.
Late-season increase in wild-moth activity
in these orchards may be caused by using
more attractive 10 mg lures and waning
effects of pheromone disruption dispens-
ers. This apparent increase in activity of
second-generation wild moths was a tem-
porary aberration in pheromone-treated
orchards. Over five years, total seasonal
catches of wild moths declined faster in
pheromone-treated orchards than they did
in the insecticide-treated orchards (Fig. 1).
Pane Traps versus Pheromone Traps.
Catches in pane traps from individual or-
chards were too low to show any signifi-
cant weekly patterns or conduct any mean-
ingful statistical analyses on catches of
either sterile or wild codling moths, so
catches were pooled across orchard treat-
ments. S:W ratios on pane traps in weeks
1 - 8 (first generation) are compared to
those in weeks 9 - 16 (second generation)
and ratios on pane traps are compared with
those reflected by pheromone trap catches
(Fig. 4). In the insecticide-treated orchards
(Fig. 4A) catches in pane traps reflect the
same pattern as pheromone traps, low S:W
ratios were observed in weeks | - 8 and
higher S:W ratios in weeks 9 - 16. S:W
ratios on pane traps increased 6.2-fold
while those in pheromone traps only in-
creased 4.8-fold across generations (Fig.
4A), suggesting activity-driven responses
to the former were more important than
increased pheromone responses to the lat-
ter.
In pheromone-treated orchards (Fig.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Wild Catches
Insecticide-treated 1995
120
80
Target S:W Ratio = 40'1
40
37
io)
o
nN
o
-
preyvutuyuda td
Pheromone-treated 1995
120
80
Mean Weekly S:W Overflooding Moth Ratio
Target S:W Ratio = 40:1 ¥
40
er |
Ww
o
peur tit pit
N
S
Mean Number of Wild Moths Caught / Trap / Week
V
HE |
S ALB eats
0 2 4 6
ee a
14 16
Weeks
Figure 3. 1995 mean weekly catches of wild male codling moths and sterile:wild moth ratios
in pheromone-baited wing traps in insecticide-treated conventional (A) and pheromone-treated
(B) organic apple orchards under management of the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Programme, in
Cawston, BC. n= 4 conventional and 5 organic orchards and 2 - 6 traps / orchard.
4B) catches with both pane traps and
pheromone traps once again reflect the
established pattern of low S:W ratios in
weeks | - 8 and higher ratios in weeks 9 -
16. However, in pheromone-treated or-
chards S:W ratios on pane traps showed
the same cross-generation increase (2.1-
fold) as pheromone traps (2.3-fold), re-
flecting suppression of sterile male re-
sponse to pheromone-baited traps in or-
chards under pheromone-based mating
disruption (Fig. 2), which artificially limits
ratios.
Catches of females on pane traps were
too low to ascribe any specific seasonal
pattern in their response.
DISCUSSION
Decades of research examining use of
sterile insect technique to control codling
moth have identified the need to maintain
40:1 S:W overflooding moth ratios in order
to achieve population reduction, and have
further emphasized the importance of do-
ing this during the first generation because
the reproductive potential of the species is
lowest at this time of year. Our detailed
examination of seasonal flight activity and
recapture of male codling moths in nine
commercial orchards under management
by sterile insect release showed significant
within-season variation over five years,
often resulting in S:W ratios less than 40:1.
Low S:W ratios were most pronounced in,
but not restricted to, the first eight weeks
of the trapping season from May through
June (Fig. 3; Table 2), the period of wild-
moth activity referred to as first generation
(Madsen and Procter 1985).
In this study, catches of first-generation
wild moths generally peaked during the
first four weeks of the season in late May
38 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
ian Weeks 1-8
1** Generation
A. Insecticide-treated 1996
—_ S i
Pane Pheromone
Trap Type
Mean + SE Sterile : Wild Moth Ratios
>
(an)
Weeks 9 - 16
2? Generation
B. Pheromone-treated 1996
100 ~
80
40 ee | as
Pheromone
Trap Type
Figure 4. 1996 mean (+ SE) sterile:wild moth ratios from catches in pheromone-baited wing
traps and sticky pane traps during first- (weeks 1 - 8) and second-generation (weeks 9 - 16)
flight-activity periods for wild moths in insecticide-treated conventional (A) and pheromone-
treated organic (B) apple orchards under management of the Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Pro-
gramme, in Cawston, BC. n = 4 conventional and 5 organic orchards and 2 - 6 pheromone
traps and 8 - 30 pane traps / orchard.
or early June (Fig. 1A-B) and when it oc-
curred, second-generation catches peaked
in weeks 11 - 12 during early August (Fig.
1B). In contrast, catches of sterile moths
(Fig. 2) were at their lowest in the first four
weeks of the season, increasing thereafter
and reaching a plateau around week 10 in
July. The observed sigmoid pattern (Fig.
2) in recaptures of sterile moths might be
explained by a combination of factors: (1)
released moths that live longer than a week
may accumulate with subsequent weekly
releases, (2) there may be greater mortality
of sterile moths in spring perhaps because
of more frequent application of insecti-
cides or cooler temperatures, (3) sterile
moths may be less responsive to phero-
mone traps in spring than summer, (4) ster-
ile moths may be less active under cool
spring temperatures than they are in sum-
mer, or (5) trap catches may be limited in
summer because trap bottoms become
saturated with moths reducing apparent
late season activity. Whatever the cause(s)
it seems likely this seasonal pattern is in-
herent to activity of sterile moths because a
similar pattern was observed in both insec-
ticide- and pheromone-treated orchards,
where the latter received no pesticides and
where traps never became saturated in
moths (Fig. 2).
Response to temperature likely explains
much of this seasonal variation because the
greatest number of sterile moths was
caught in 1998 (Table 1), the warmest
spring in this five-year study, and a signifi-
cant linear correlation was found between
mean weekly catches and mean tempera-
tures. S:W ratios in catches on passive
pane traps were also greater during weeks
9 - 16 compared with weeks 1 - 8 (Fig.
4A), lending support to the idea that sterile
moths are simply less active than wild
moths in cool spring weather (Bloem and
Bloem 1996; Bloem et a/. 1998). The lack
of any significant difference in spring-time
S:W ratios in pheromone- and insecticide-
supplemented orchards when measured by
pheromone traps (compare Fig. 4A and
4B), is further indication of a seasonal dif-
ference in activity. Catches of sterile
moths are suppressed by pheromone treat-
ment in summer (Fig. 2) and this reduces
S:W ratios relative to insecticide-treated
orchards when measured using pheromone
traps during weeks 9 - 16 (compare Fig.
4A and 4B). In spring the opposite occurs.
Activity of sterile moths as evidenced by
catches in the insecticide-treated orchards
(Fig. 2) is already low in spring. There-
fore, full expression of disruption is not
seen in spring and S:W ratios are more
similar in pheromone- and_insecticide-
treated orchards when measured using
pheromone traps (compare Fig. 4A and
4B).
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Inactivity of sterile moths may be an
artifact of laboratory-rearing conditions.
Proverbs (1971) stated, although no data
were presented, that moths reared at high
constant temperatures, as they are in the
current SIR Programme (Bloem and
Bloem 2000), are less active in spring than
wild moths, and males reared at constant
temperatures are apparently less responsive
to synthetic pheromone than males reared
under fluctuating temperatures, especially
in spring (Proverbs 1982). Hutt (1979)
confirmed that recapture of sterile codling
moths in pheromone traps increased after
insects were reared at fluctuating tempera-
tures. However, Bloem ef al. (1998) did
not see an affect of fluctuating rearing con-
ditions on pane-trap catches in spring and
they saw greater catches in pheromone
traps in fall than in summer, even though
dusk temperatures were cooler in fall.
These apparent contradictions suggest ad-
ditional factors may be at work. Whether
temperature impacts flight activity of ster-
ile moths directly, or indirectly through
rearing, or somehow modulates their re-
sponse to pheromone sources remains to be
determined. It should be noted that mass-
rearing of sterile moths under fluctuating
temperature regimes was tested but
deemed impractical in the current Osoyoos
rearing facility (Bloem ef a/. 1998).
When the SIR Programme was de-
signed and production capabilities of the
rearing facility were considered (Dyck ef
al. 1993), it was calculated that production
and release should be able to ensure 40:1
overflooding ratios if the Pre-release Sani-
tation phase could reduce populations of
wild codling moth to levels resulting in no
more than 0.1- 0.3% harvest damage. It
was assumed this level of damage would
result in no more than 2 wild moths / trap /
week / orchard and initial release numbers
were generated around this threshold
(Bloem and Bloem 2000). Assuming
catches in pheromone traps reflect opera-
tional ratios of sterile and wild moth popu-
lations, traps need to show catches of 80
sterile males / trap / week, if the SIR Pro-
gramme is going to maintain 40:1 ratios
39
when wild populations are this large. Our
data show that during the first eight weeks
of the season this target was only achieved
in 1998. These data strongly suggest
populations of wild moths should be re-
duced to levels resulting in no more than 1
wild moth / trap / week at peak flight to
ensure S:W ratios are consistently at or
above the 40:1 target during spring.
Alternatively, if wild populations are
not reduced, 40:1 S:W ratios might be
maintained by releasing more sterile moths
when wild populations are reaching 2
moths / trap / week. Intuitively, this
sounds like a reasonable approach but our
analysis suggests it may be questionable in
spring. For example, recaptures of sterile
moths released in 1995 and 1997 were not
significantly different in either generation
(Table 1). This is surprising because the
SIR Programme reportedly released 1.7
times more sterile moths in 1997 than
1995, and fewer insecticides were applied
against codling moth in 1997 than in 1995.
With catches of sterile moths averaging
37.9 / trap / week during first generation in
1997, the best that might have been
achieved was a 19:1 S:W ratio if 2 wilds /
trap / week were caught. At this level of
wilds even median catches in summer
1997 (Table 1) would not have produced
an overflooding ratio of 40:1. These ob-
servations strongly suggest that increasing
production and release of sterile moths in
1997 had no demonstrable impact on re-
capture of sterile moths in our study or-
chards, particularly in spring, and these
increases would rarely have resulted in
adequate S:W ratios in individual orchards
unless wild populations were reduced well
below 2 moths / trap / week.
As a caveat, it should be noted that
more sterile moths were produced and re-
leased in 1997 than in 1995, but there are
no records to verify the number of moths
release drivers delivered to any particular
orchard. It can also be argued that opera-
tional S:W ratios might have appeared
larger in this study had we used a trap
which was less susceptible to saturation
with sterile moths than small wing traps.
40 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
However, while trap saturation may play a
role in the plateau seen on catch curves in
summer (Fig. 2), which conceivably places
upper limits on S:W ratios, trap saturation
was never an issue in spring, nor on pane
traps, nor in pheromone-treated orchards
showing the same trends. One of the rea-
sons we used wing traps was because these
traps were the standard for the operational
programme being assessed.
In spite of suboptimal S:W ratios, mean
seasonal catches of wild moths declined
from 1995 - 1999 in orchards receiving
sterile moths and supplemental insecticides
in spring. After three years, second-
generation moths were almost undetectable
(Fig. 1A). Ignoring the few late-season
catches of moths in 1998 and 1999 as re-
sulting from outside sources like wooden
apple bins (SIR Programme, unpublished
data), an apparent disappearance of sec-
ond-generation codling moths by 1997
(Fig. 1A), combined with maintenance of
S:W moth ratios greater than 40:1 during
weeks 9 - 16 throughout 1996 - 1997
(Table 2), supports the view that it is possi-
ble to eliminate summer populations of
codling moths within three years in local-
ized areas. The difficulty comes in sepa-
rating the cause(s) of this population de-
cline. It seems likely that intensive insecti-
cide application during first generation
(Bloem and Bloem 2000) was critical in
achieving this result. Insecticides applied
against first-generation larvae will un-
doubtedly reduce resulting adult popula-
tions in second generation, especially when
this is done on an area-wide basis as it was
during this study. The potential for immi-
gration of background wild populations
was probably greatly reduced by this area-
wide approach to spraying and other clean-
up procedures. The effect of these insecti-
cides is probably the reason why traps in
conventional insecticide-treated orchards
revealed little or no second-generation
wild moth flight activity in 1995 and 1996,
but in pheromone-treated orchards there
was a relatively large second-generation
catch in 1995 (Fig. 1A-B). It seems diffi-
cult to argue that observed reductions in
second-generation wild moths (Fig. 1A)
would have more to do with suboptimal
S:W ratios in spring, than with insecticide
applications. Likewise, providing evi-
dence that large S:W ratios during sum-
mers of 1997 - 1999 had more to do with
increasing catches of sterile moths (Fig. 2),
than it did with the absence of a second-
generation of wild moths (Fig. 1A), is dif-
ficult. This being the case, it may make
more economic sense to apply insecticides
during first generation and only release
moths during the second generation.
In spite of extensive spraying, five
years of moth release (1994 - 1998), and
S:W ratios during second-generation that
were always above 40:1 in 1997 and 1998
(Table 2), first-generation moths persisted
into 1999 in the insecticide-treated or-
chards. These data are similar to results
reported for Zone 1 as a whole, where av-
erage trap captures for all orchards showed
great reductions in the second generation
in 1995, and persistence of a small first
generation through 1997 (Bloem and
Bloem 2000). Further evidence of this
persistence came from 1500 Zone-1 or-
chards sampled in 1999 using cardboard
tree bands (Judd et al. 1997), which found
that 15% still had overwintering codling
moth larval populations going into 2000
(HMAT, unpublished SIR Programme
data). It appears a small portion of the
larval population arising from _first-
generation mating can escape control by
insecticides in spring and sterile insect
technique in summer. We hypothesize that
early-emerging univoltine larvae not killed
by insecticides in spring, and diapausing in
summer because they are univoltine, could
potentially escape both controls. Studies
of the degree to which diapause and voltin-
ism may affect predictions of eradication
or long-term management of codling moth
populations are warranted, especially as
efforts to release sterile insects move fur-
ther north in BC where a greater degree of
early diapause is anticipated.
Predictions of eradication of codling
moth from Zone 1 by 1996 (Dyck eft al.
1993) and subsequent predictions by 1999
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
(Bloem and Bloem 2000) were not real-
ized. Our data suggest that low S:W over-
flooding ratios during spring may have
contributed to a slow rate of population
decline. Several studies have emphasized
the point that sterile males have their great-
est impact on reproduction of codling moth
in first generation (Proverbs ef a/. 1966;
Proverbs 1971). In studies where codling
moth population reduction has clearly been
demonstrated using sterile insect technique
(Proverbs et al. 1966, 1977; Proverbs et al.
1982), the authors report it was rare for
S:W ratios to fall below 40:1, at anytime
during the season. Inadequate spring-time
ratios in the BC SIR Programme, means
control is largely exerted against one gen-
eration each year. Controlling three gen-
erations instead of six over a three-year
period, likely doubles the time required for
eradication from 3 - 6 years, which seems
consistent with reported progress (Bloem
and Bloem 2000). Within-season and be-
tween-orchard variation in S:W ratios was
not revealed by average yearly overflood-
ing ratios (Table 1), a coarse-grained sta-
tistic often used in sterile insect pro-
grammes. These summary type ratios are
artificially inflated by summing catches of
sterile moths during periods of the season
when there are no wilds, thus giving a mis-
leading impression of the control effort
being achieved. This type of reporting
may not be applicable in an area-wide pro-
gramme where there are many, small, non-
contiguous orchards and wild populations
to be eliminated.
If eradication were to be a goal of any
SIR programme against codling moth, then
efforts must include continued use of in-
secticides in spring, or reduction of early-
season reproduction by means other than
sterile moths. In choosing supplemental
controls it must be noted that while apply-
ing insecticides during first generation
obviously increases larval mortality, it also
kills sterile moths, or potentially impairs
their pheromone response (Linn and
4]
Roelofs 1984; Haynes and Baker 1985).
Biological insecticides like Virosoft-CP4",
a commercial granulovirus product may be
useful because they act on larvae and not
adult moths. Our results suggest applica-
tion of pheromone-disruption treatments
against first-generation moths may also be
very useful in augmenting control by ster-
ile insects, especially in organic orchards.
Although codling moth was not eradi-
cated in BC and progress was slower and
more costly than anticipated, it was re-
duced to sub-economic levels in most
Zone-1 orchards by 2001. Reliance on
sterile insect technology seems capable of
keeping damage below economic levels
but there is some question about financial
sustainability (Dendy ef a/. 2001). When
much of the expenditure in a typical SIR
programme is on rearing and releasing
moths, the moths must be used effectively.
In our analysis, we have focussed on a
ratio of 40:1, because all previous work
suggested this was necessary for eradica-
tion. However, it appears that ratios less
than 40:1 can stabilize but not eliminate
populations, and provide some suppression
rather than eradication. The key question
for management then becomes what ratios
are acceptable in that new context.
An analysis of the SIR Programme
trapping data from 1994 - 2004, on an indi-
vidual orchard basis, within a spatial con-
text, may provide insight on the S:W ratios
providing suppression. If historic opera-
tional S:W overflooding ratios were corre-
lated with damage data, analysis may re-
veal why the programme has worked in
some orchards and areas, and not 1n others.
Such analysis may also provide a more
realistic appraisal of any codling moth SIR
programme and would compliment the
detailed observations we have made on a
subset of orchards. This type of analysis
will also be useful in planning the best use
of sterile codling moths in BC, and other
parts of the world where this technique is
currently being considered.
42 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Similkameen-Okanagan
Organic Producers' Association (SOOPA)
and its cooperating members for allowing
us to conduct trials in their orchards and
Jule Boulé, Lila DeLury, Janine Gartrell,
Karen Todd, Nicole Verpaelst and Nicole
Weremy for their technical assistance. The
Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Board provided
Director, 1998 - 2001, and GJRJ was Chair
of the Technical Advisory Committee,
1998 - 2000. This research was partially
funded by SOOPA, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Washington State Tree Fruit
Research Commission and the Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada Matching Invest-
ment Initiative.
unpublished data; HMAT was Technical
REFERENCES
Allen, J.C. 1976. A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environmental Entomology
5: 388-396.
Bloem, K.A. and S. Bloem. 1996. Codling moth eradication program in British Columbia: a review and
update, pp. 101-110. Jn M.T. Ali Niazee and L.E. Long (eds.), Biology and control of cherry fruit
flies: a worldwide perspective. Special Report 971. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, Corvallis, Oregon.
Bloem, K.A. and S. Bloem. 2000. SIT for codling moth eradication in British Columbia, Canada, pp.
207-214. Jn K.-H. Tan (ed.), Area-wide control of fruit flies and other insect pests. Joint Proceedings
of the International Conference on area-wide control of insect pests, and the Fifth International Sym-
posium on fruit flies of economic importance, May-June 1998. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia,
Pulau Penang.
Bloem, S., K.A. Bloem, and A.L. Knight. 1998. Assessing the quality of mass-reared codling moths
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by using field release-recapture tests. Journal of Economic Entomology
91: 1122-1130.
Brinton, F.E., M.D. Proverbs, and B.E. Carty. 1969. Artificial diet for mass production of the codling
moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). The Canadian Entomologist 101: 577-
584.
Dendy, C., M.G. Powell, and Associates. 2001. A study of the financial sustainability of the Okanagan-
Kootenay SIR Program for control of codling moth post 2005. Report to the Okanagan Valley Tree
Fruit Authority and Okanagan-Kootenay SIR Board. Vernon, British Columbia. August 2001.
Dyck, V.A. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 1992. Sterile-insect release programme to control the codling moth
Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in British Columbia, Canada. Acta Phytopa-
thologica et Entomologica Hungarica 27: 219-222.
Dyck, V.A., S.H. Graham, and K.A. Bloem. 1993. Implementation of the sterile insect release pro-
gramme to eradicate the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), in British
Columbia, Canada, pp. 285-297. In IAEA Management of Insect Pests: Nuclear, and Related Molecu-
lar Techniques, Vienna, 1992. SM-327/29.
Haynes, K.F. and T.C. Baker. 1985. Sublethal effects of permethrin on the chemical communication sys-
tem of pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiol-
ogy 2: 283-293.
Higley, L.G., L.P. Pedigo, and K.R. Ostlie. 1986. DEGDAY: a program for calculating degree-days, and
assumptions behind the degree-day approach. Environmental Entomology 15: 999-1016.
Hutt, R.B. 1979. Codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae)): improving field
performance of mass-reared males. The Canadian Entomologist 111: 661-664
Hutt, R.B. and L.D. White. 1979. Status of sterile insect technique: investigations on codling moth at the
Yakima agricultural research laboratory. Science and Education Administration. Agricultural Re-
views and Manuals. W9: 1-10. United States Department of Agriculture, Oakland, California.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1996. Commercial trials of pheromone-mediated
mating disruption with Isomate-C® to control codling moth in British Columbia apple and pear or-
chards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 93: 23-34.
Judd, G.J.R., M.G.T. Gardiner, and D.R. Thomson. 1997. Control of codling moth in organically-
managed apple orchards by combining pheromone-mediated mating disruption, post-harvest fruit
removal and tree banding. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 137-146.
Judd, G.J.R. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 2004. Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication and
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 43
mating in Cydia pomonella, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) using Isomate-CM/LR in apple orchards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Colum-
bia 101: 3-14.
Linn, C.E. and W.L. Roelofs. 1984. Sublethal effects of neuroactive compounds on pheromone response
thresholds in male oriental fruit moths. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 1: 331-344.
Madsen, H.F. and P.J. Procter. 1985. Insects and mites of tree fruits in British Columbia. British Colum-
bia Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 82-6. Victoria, BC.
McMechan A.D. and M.D. Proverbs. 1972. Equipment and procedures for release of sterile codling
moths. Canadian Agriculture Engineering 14: 42-45.
Proverbs, M.D. 1964. The sterile male technique and its possible use for codling moth eradication. The
Canadian Entomologist 96: 143.
Proverbs, M.D. 1971. Orchard assessment of radiation-sterilized moths for control of Laspeyresia pomo-
nella (L.) in British Columbia, pp. 117-133. /n: IAEA Panel on application of induced sterility for
control of Lepidopterous populations, Vienna, June 1-5, 1970. Panel Proceedings Series. International
Atomic Energy Agency, STI/PUB/281, 1971.
Proverbs, M.D. 1982. Sterile insect technique in codling moth control, pp. 85-99. Jn IAEA Sterile insect
technique and radiation in insect control. Proceedings of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
Vienna, 1981.
Proverbs, M.D., J.R. Newton, and D.M. Logan. 1966. Orchard assessment of the sterile male technique
for control of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). The Cana-
dian Entomologist 98: 90-95.
Proverbs, M.D., J.R. Newton, and D.M. Logan. 1977. Codling moth control by the sterility method in
twenty-one British Columbia orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 70: 667-671.
Proverbs, M.D., J.R. Newton, and C.J. Campbell. 1982. Codling moth: a pilot program of control by
sterile insect release in British Columbia. The Canadian Entomologist 114: 363-376.
Weissling, T.J. and A.L. Knight. 1994. Passive trap for monitoring codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) flight activity. Journal of Economic Entomology 87: 103-107.
White, L.D., B.A. Butt, H.R. Moffitt, R.B. Hutt, R.G. Winterfield, L.-G. Schoenleber, and D.O. Hathaway.
1976. Codling moths: suppression of populations from releases of sterile insects in the Wenas Valley
of Washington, 1972. Journal of Economic Entomology 69: 319-323.
Zar, JH. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, Second edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
44
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 45
Use of Ethyl and Propyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoates in Codling
Moth Management: Improved Monitoring in Bartlett Pear
with High Dose Lures
A.L. KNIGHT! and D.M. LIGHT’
ABSTRACT
The propyl and ethyl esters of (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoic acid were evaluated in gray halobu-
tyl septa as kairomone lures for both sexes of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). All
studies were conducted in ‘Bartlett’ pear orchards with moderate to high codling moth
adult population densities and treated with sex pheromone dispensers for mating disrup-
tion. Variable results were obtained with kairomone loading experiments. Increasing the
lure loading to 40.0 mg of either the ethyl or propyl ester significantly increased male
and total moth catch in separate experiments. However, in other tests with the ethyl ester
no difference was found in total moth catch in traps baited with 0.1, 1.0, 3.0 or 10.0 mg
versus 40.0 mg lures. The 40.0 mg ethyl and propyl ester lures were both more effective
than a 3.0 mg ethyl ester lure and comparable to a sex pheromone lure in detecting the
beginning of codling moth flight in the spring generation. No difference was found in
moth catch between 40.0 mg propyl and ethyl ester lures. Significantly more females
were caught in traps baited with 1.0 — 10.0 mg than with 1.0 — 100.0 ug lures loaded
with the ethyl ester. In general, kairomone lures caught significantly fewer moths than
sex pheromone lures.
Key Words: Cydia pomonella, monitoring, kairomone, trapping
INTRODUCTION
Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)
(Lepidoptera: Torticidae), 1s a worldwide,
key internal pest of pear, Pyrus communis
L., and adult populations in commercial
orchards are typically monitored with traps
baited with sex pheromone lures (Ried1 ef
al. 1986). Reliable adult monitoring is es-
pecially critical in orchards where codling
moth is managed with applications of its
sex pheromone for mating disruption
(Knight 2002a). The sex pheromone treat-
ment disrupts the attractiveness of the sex
pheromone-baited trap, and traps can fail
to alert pest managers of potential prob-
lems. Efforts to improve the usefulness of
traps in sex pheromone-treated orchards
have included the use of high-dose lures
(Charmillot 1990) and an increased density
of traps (Gut and Brunner 1996).
Identification of ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate as a potent kairomone attrac-
tant for codling moth adults and larvae has
allowed the development of several new
approaches to successfully monitor and
manage this pest (Knight and Light 2001;
Light et al. 2001). Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate is attractive to both sexes of
codling moth, and traps can be used to
assess the timing of female emergence and
activity, as well as mating status. In addi-
tion, the attractiveness of the lure is not
strongly affected by the application of sex
pheromones (Light et a/. 2001), and the
lure can improve the prediction of local
pest population densities (Knight 2002b).
Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate is a major
volatile of ripe pear (Jennings ef al. 1964),
and is not found in immature fruit or pear-
'Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA 5230 Konnowac Pass
Rd., Wapato, WA 98951
> Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, CA 94710
46 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
leaf volatiles (Miller et a/. 1989, Scutare-
anu et al. 1997). An initial evaluation sug-
gested that ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate
might not be an effective attractant for
codling moth adults in pear orchards (Light
et al. 2001). However, this conclusion was
based on data collected with 1.0 mg lures
placed in three conventional ‘Bartlett’ or-
chards with high levels of codling moth (>
3 moths trapped per day with a sex phero-
mone lure and detectable levels of fruit
injury). The relatively low attractiveness of
the synthetic ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate
lure in these pear orchards was hypothe-
sized to be due to olfactory “masking” of
the lure by natural sources of ethyl (£,Z)-
2,4-decadienoate released either from in-
jured or ripening fruits or by competing
host volatiles (Light et a/., 2001). A second
study found that lures loaded with 3.0 mg
of ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate were simi-
lar or more attractive than sex pheromone
lures in four cultivars of pear when or-
chards were treated with sex pheromones
(Knight et al. 2005). Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate lures performed similarly
early and late in the season relative to a sex
pheromone lure in these cultivars suggest-
ing that maturation of fruit was not an im-
portant factor affecting lure attractiveness.
Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate lures again
performed poorly only in ‘Bartlett’ pear
orchards with high population densities of
codling moth that were defined by catches
in sex pheromone-baited traps exceeding
20 moths per season and the presence of
fruit injury (Knight et a/. 2005).
Improvements in developing a more
attractive kairomone lure for codling moth
in pear may involve optimizing its emis-
sion rate and/or the use of alternative at-
tractants. Light et al. (2001) reported that
ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate loaded into
gray halobutyl lures was attractive at doses
> 10.0 ug, and the highest moth catches in
walnut orchards occurred with 10.0 mg
lures. Studies testing doses of ethyl (£,Z)-
2,4-decadienoate > 3.0 mg in pear have not
been reported. Among the 23 volatile
blends tested by Light et a/. (2001), only
the blend of methyl and ethyl esters of ten-
carbon acids were attractive to adult cod-
ling moth. Within this group, methyl (£,Z)-
2,4-decadienoate was found to be some-
what attractive in both apple and walnut
orchards. This compound was also attrac-
tive to neonate codling moth (Knight and
Light 2001). Unfortunately, the methyl
ester 1s another component of ripe pears
(Heinz et al. 1966, Shiota 1990), and its
attractiveness to codling moth would also
likely be influenced by competition with
volatile fruit odors within the orchard.
An alternative approach in developing
an improved kairomone may be to utilize a
related volatile that 1s not present in pear
orchards. Propyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate
has been identified from pear by GLC
analysis following an isopentane extraction
of ripe ‘Bartlett? puree (Creveling and
Jennings 1970), but not from volatile head-
space collections of intact fruit (Light et al.
2001) or codling moth-injured fruit (D. M.
L., unpublished data). GC-EAD antennal
response to a synthetic homologous series
of decadienoic esters found that codling
moth’s antennal receptivity is stimulated
by the ethyl ester, with both the methyl-
and propyl-esters eliciting a smaller depo-
larization response (D. M. L., unpublished
data). The behavioral effects elicited in
codling moth by _ propyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate are unreported. Herein, we
report studies optimizing the dose of ethyl
and propyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in sepa-
rate lures for monitoring adult codling
moth in ‘Bartlett’ pear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field test protocol. Field trials were
conducted in 1999, 2001, and 2002 to
evaluate the attractiveness of lures loaded
with different doses of ethyl and propyl
(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate versus sex phero-
mone lures (L2™ and Megalure™, Trécé
Inc., Salinas, California [CA]). The ethyl
(93.7% A.I.) and propyl esters (94.7%
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
A.I.) were synthesized by Trécé Inc. and
loaded in gray halobutyl elastomer septa.
All studies were conducted in ‘Bartlett’
pear orchards located near Wapato, Wash-
ington (WA) and treated with 700 — 1,000
Isomate-C PLUS sex pheromone dispens-
ers (Pacific Biocontrol, Vancouver, WA)
per ha. All studies were conducted with
diamond-shaped sticky traps (Pherocon
IIB, Trécé Inc., Salinas, CA) attached to
poles placed in the upper third of the trees’
canopy. Traps were placed 30 — 50 m apart
within each orchard. Traps were checked
weekly and replaced when needed. Moths
were sexed in all studies.
Optimizing the lure dose of ethyl
(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate. Two experiments
were conducted in 1999 to examine vari-
ous doses of ethyl ester. Experiment 1
compared the attractiveness of lures loaded
with the ethyl ester at doses of 1.0, 10.0,
and 100.0 ug and 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg
versus the L2™ sex pheromone lure. Eight
replicates of each lure dose were used.
Traps were randomized, placed in the or-
chard on 21 May, and checked weekly
until 28 June. Traps were not rotated in
this study. Experiment 2 evaluated a
smaller subset of lure doses of the ethyl
ester: 1.0, 10.0, and 40.0 mg, versus the
Megalure’™. Nine replicates of each lure
type were randomized in the field on 30
June, and traps were checked and rotated
weekly until 27 July.
Optimizing the lure dose of propyl
(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate. An experiment
was conducted in 2001 to compare the
47
attractiveness of the propyl ester at lure
doses of 1.0, 3.0. 10.0 and 40.0 mg versus
the standard 3.0 mg ethyl ester lure. Ten
replicates of each lure dose and type were
randomly placed within a single orchard on
9 May and checked weekly until 5 July.
Traps were rotated within the orchard each
week.
Comparison of kairomone and sex
pheromone lures. Two experiments were
conducted to compare the attractiveness of
lures loaded with 3.0 or 40.0 mg ethyl es-
ter, a lure loaded with 40.0 mg propyl es-
ter, and the commercial high-dose sex
pheromone lure, Megalure’™. The first
experiment was conducted during 2001 in
ten orchards. Traps were placed in each
orchard on 3 July and checked and rotated
each week until 15 August. The second
experiment was conducted in 2002 in the
same ten orchards. Traps were placed in
the orchards on 22 April and checked and
rotated weekly until 1 July.
Data analysis. Significant differences
in the cumulative moth catch in traps
baited with each lure over the specified
time interval were determined with one
way analysis of variance (ANOVA), P <
0.05 (Analytical Software 2000). Count
data were transformed prior to analysis
with square root (x + 0.01). Differences in
the detection of first moth flight among
lures were determined by ANOVA with
data collected in 2002. Means were sepa-
rated with Fisher’s least significant differ-
ence test within all significant ANOVA’s.
RESULTS
Optimizing the lure dose of ethyl
(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate. Significant differ-
ences were found among the various doses
of the ethyl ester and the sex pheromone
lure in the cumulative catch of male (F =
20.38; df = 6, 49; P < 0.001) and total
moths (F = 16.09; df = 6, 49; P< 0.001) in
experiment 1 (Table 1). The sex phero-
mone lure caught significantly more males
and total moths than any of the ethyl ester
lures. Traps baited with ethyl ester lures
loaded with 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg caught
significantly more males than traps baited
with 1.0 and 10.0 pug lures and more total
moths than traps baited with the 1.0 pug
lure. Significant differences were found in
the catch of female moths among the kai-
romone lures (F' = 7.19; df = 5, 42; P <
0.001) (Table 1). Lures loaded with 1.0 —
10.0 mg ethyl ester caught significantly
more female moths than lures loaded with
1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 ug (Table 1).
48 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
Attractiveness of ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (Et-E,Z-DD) lures compared with sex phero-
mone lures in ‘Bartlett’ pear orchards, 1999.
Mean cumulative capture + SE of codling moth per trap’
Exp.” Lure, loading Males Females* Total
] Et-E£,Z-DD, 1.0 ug 0.50 + 0.38d 0.38 + 0.18b 0.88 + 0.52d
Et-E,Z-DD, 10.0 pg 1.25 0/39¢d 0.75 + 0.31b 2.00 + 0.85cd
Et-E,Z-DD, 100.0 pg 3.13 + 0.88bc 1.00 + 0.50b 4.13 + 0.99bced
Et-E,Z-DD, 1.0 mg 4.50 + 0.93b 3.13+1.0la 7.63 + 1.61be
Et-E,Z-DD, 3.0 mg 5.25 2 10b 3,25 = 0.75a 8.50 + 1.46b
Et-E,Z-DD, 10.0 mg 5.50 + 0.99b 4.75 + 0.90a 10.25+1.71b
Sex pheromone, N.A. ° 28.00 + 5.20a - 28.00 + 5.20a
2 Et-E,Z-DD, 1.0 mg 2.33 + 0.80c 0.89 + 0.54a 3.22 + 10%c
Et-E,Z-DD, 10.0 mg 1.78 + 0.49c 0.89 + 0.35a 2.07 Ol82C
Et-E,Z-DD, 40.0 mg 8.33 + 1.73b 1.00 + 0.47a 9:33 a22-130
Sex Pheromone, N.A. ° 21.78 + 4.98a - 21.78 + 4.98a
‘Column means within each experiment followed by a different letter are significantly differ-
ent at P < 0.05, Fisher’s LSD.
Experiment 1 was conducted from 21 May —22 June and experiment 2 was conducted from 30
June — 27 July 1999.
*Not available. Proprietary loadings in the L2™ and Megalure™ sex pheromone lures used in
experiments | and 2, respectively have not been published (Trécé Inc., Salinas, CA).
Significant differences in the catch of
male (F' = 12.08; df = 3, 32; P < 0.0001)
and total moths (F = 15.37; df = 3, 32; P<
0.0001) among the ethyl ester and sex
pheromone lures were also found in ex-
periment 2 (Table 1). The sex pheromone
lure caught significantly more males and
total moths than any of the three doses of
the ethyl ester tested. The 40.0 mg ethyl
ester lure caught significantly more males
and total moths than the 1.0 and 10.0 mg
lures. No significant differences in the
catch of female moths occurred among
doses of the ethyl ester in this experiment
(F = 0.02; df = 2, 24; P= 0.98).
Optimizing the lure dose of propyl
(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate. Significant differ-
ences were found in the mean captures of
males (F= 3.91; df = 4, 45; P < 0.01) and
total moths (F' = 3.23; df= 4, 45; P < 0.05)
among different doses of the propyl ester
and the 3.0 mg ethyl ester lure (Table 2).
The highest dose of the propyl ester (40.0
mg) caught significantly more males and
total moths than the other lures. No differ-
ence was found among lures in the catch of
female codling moth (F = 2.29; df = 4, 45;
P =0.07).
Comparison of kairomone and sex
pheromone lures. During the first genera-
tion flight in 2002 there was no difference
in moth catch among the sex pheromone
and kairomone lures (F = 0.97; df = 3, 36;
P =0.42). However, there was a significant
difference among lures in the first detec-
tion of moth flight (F = 4.39; df = 3, 36; P
< 0.01). The first adult codling moth
caught by the 3.0 mg ethyl ester lure was
on average nearly 2 wk later than the other
lures (Table 3). The high-dose kairomone
and sex pheromone lures did not differ in
their detection of the start of codling
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
49
Table 2.
Evaluation of the attractiveness of ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (Et-E,Z-DD) and propyl (£,Z)-
2,4-decadienoate (Pr-£,Z-DD) lures in ten Bartlett pear orchards from 9 May to 5 July 2001.
Mean cumulative capture + SE of codling moth per trap’
Lure Loading (mg) Males Females Total
Pr-E,Z-DD 1.0 2.3 + 0.6b 0.8 + 0.3a 3.1+0.6b
Pr-E,Z-DD 3.0 2.6 + 0.6b 1.0+0.3a 3.6 +0.8b
Pr-E,Z-DD 10.0 2.4+0.4b 0.2+0.1la 2.6 + 0.4b
Pr-E,Z-DD 40.0 5.4+0.9a 0.6+0.3a 6.0+ 1.0a
Et-£,Z-DD 3.0 3.5 0.70 0.2+0.1la 3.7 + 0.6b
‘Column means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P < 0.05, Fisher’s
LSD.
Table 3.
The effectiveness of the ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (Et-E,Z-DD), propyl (E,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate (Pr-E,Z-DD), and sex pheromone lures in monitoring first generation codling
moth in ten ‘Bartlett’ pear orchards treated with sex pheromone, 22 April to 1 July 2002.
Mean + SE cumulative
Mean + SE weeks to
ate oasis cine) moth catch per trap’ first moth catch
Pr-£,Z-DD 40.0 94+ 1.7a 3,14 0.5a
Et-E,Z-DD 3.0 14.2 + 3.6a 4.8+0.2b
Et-E,Z-DD 40.0 15.4+3.7a 2.2+0.la
Sex pheromone Nak 24.8 + 12.0a 3.0+0.8a
‘Column means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P < 0.05, Fisher’s
LSD.
Not available. Proprietary loading in the Megalure’™ high-dose sex pheromone lure has not
been published (Trécé Inc., Salinas, CA).
moth’s spring flight. A significant differ-
ence in the capture of codling moth adults
was found among lures during the second
generation in 2001 (F = 4.06; df = 3, 36; P
< 0.05). The sex pheromone lure caught 4-
to 13-times more moths than the various
kairomone lures (Table 4). No differences
in male, female, and total moth catch were
found among kairomone lures in this test.
DISCUSSION
The hypothesis and rationale for the
synthesis and testing of the un-natural syn-
thetic propyl ester were the potential for its
greater detectability, attractiveness, or cap-
ture activity in orchards where high levels
of pear fruit damage are causing the preco-
cious liberation of large, perhaps masking,
amounts of the natural methyl and ethyl
esters. However, our results with the pro-
pyl ester lures were inconsistent. The 40.0
mg propyl ester lure caught significantly
more total moths and males than similar
lures loaded with 1.0 — 10.0 mg and more
than the 3.0 mg ethyl lure during May and
50 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 4.
Evaluation of the attractiveness of the ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (Et-E,Z-DD), propyl (E, Z)-
2,4-decadienoate (Pr-E,Z-DD), and a commercial sex pheromone lure in monitoring second
generation codling moth flight in ten ‘Bartlett’ pear orchards treated with sex pheromone, 3
July to 15 August 2001.
Mean + SE cumulative moth catch per trap!
Lure Dose (mg) Males Females Total
Pr-E,Z-DD 40.0 36.2196 3.0 4 19a 7.0 + 4.5b
Et-£,Z-DD 3.0 3.0 + 1.0b del aeel 8a 6.1 +2.7b
Et-E,Z-DD 40.0 2.0+0.5b 1.4+0.6a 3.4+0.9b
Sex pheromone N.A? 26.9 + 9.3a ‘ 26.9 + 9.3a
‘Column means followed by a different letter are significantly different at P < 0.05, Fisher’s
LSD.
Not available. Proprietary loading in the Megalure ™ high-dose sex pheromone lure has not
been published (Trécé Inc., Salinas, CA).
June in 2001, yet from July to mid August
in 2001 and from late April through June
in 2002 traps baited with the 40.0 mg pro-
py! lure did not catch more moths than the
3.0 mg ethyl ester lure. Thus no clear ad-
vantage in using the propyl ester versus the
ethyl ester was demonstrated in these stud-
les.
The effect of increasing the loading rate
of the ethyl ester was also inconsistent
among experiments. No significant differ-
ence in moth catch was found in traps
baited with 1.0 — 10.0 mg ethyl ester in late
May to June in 1999, but the 40.0 mg lure
caught significantly more total moths and
males than either the 1.0 or 10.0 mg lure
during July. However, from July to mid
August in 2001 and from late April
through June in 2002 no difference in moth
catch occurred in traps baited with either a
3.0 or 40.0 mg ethyl ester lure.
The 40.0 mg kairomone lures, however,
were effective in detecting the beginning
of the first generation moth flight in pear,
whereas moth catch in traps baited with the
3.0 mg ethyl ester lure was delayed. Simi-
lar patterns of delayed first moth catch
have been found with 3.0 mg ethyl ester
lures in apple orchards (A.L.K., unpub-
lished data), but not in walnut (Light et al.
2001). Accurate detection of the start of
moth flight (“Biofix”) is widely used to
predict the start of egg hatch and in timing
insecticide applications (Riedl et a/. 1976).
Thus, the 40.0 mg ethyl ester lure may be
an improved kairomone lure to monitor
early-season codling moth flight activity.
Traps baited with either kairomone
were not as effective as traps baited with
sex pheromone in capturing codling moth
in all but one study (early season 2002
trial). This negative result was similar to
other data collected with the 3.0 mg ethyl
ester lure from ‘Bartlett’? orchards in the
same fruit-growing region of WA (Knight
et al. 2005). The relatively poor perform-
ance of the ethyl ester lure in both WA
studies is in contrast to its higher perform-
ance than sex pheromone lures in CA
‘Bartlett’? orchards (Zoller and Zoller
2003). A major difference between the
published WA and CA studies is the popu-
lation densities of codling moth within the
monitored orchards. Mean moth catch in
sex pheromone-baited traps was >80 moths
per trap per season in WA ‘Bartlett’ or-
chards (Knight et a/. 2005) and >20 moths
per trap over the one- to two-month studies
reported here. Codling moth fruit injury
occurred at levels >10.0% in many of these
orchards. In comparison, mean cumulative
moth catch in the sex pheromone-baited
traps was 2.7 per season in CA ‘Bartlett’
orchards and fruit imjury was <0.5%
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
(Zoller and Zoller 2003). A similar reduc-
tion in the attractiveness of the ethyl ester
was found in the second generation of cod-
ling moth for apple orchards with high
levels of fruit injury (Light et al. 2001).
Additional studies are needed to refine
under which field conditions the pear es-
ters are likely to perform well, 1.e. crop,
cultivar, season, crop load, fruit maturity,
and percent injured fruit (Knight 2002b).
Comparing the statistical correlations of
moth catch in sex pheromone- and kairo-
mone-baited traps with egg density or lev-
els of fruit injury versus the absolute
counts would likely be more informative in
developing an improved monitoring pro-
gram for codling moth.
Similarly, interpretation of the numbers
and timing of female moth capture is a
unique feature of kairomone-baited traps
that has not been fully utilized. Traps
baited with ethyl ester typically catch from
40 — 60% female codling moth (Light ef al.
2001), and similar data were reported
across four pear cultivars in orchards with
5]
both low and high moth population densi-
ties (Knight ef a/. 2005). In our current
study, female moths were caught in traps
baited with either ester and across all lure-
loading rates. Significantly more female
moths were caught in traps baited with
>1.0 mg ethyl ester than at the lower rates
tested and no additional increase was
found with lure loadings up to 40.0 mg.
Results with the propyl ester were similar
and no differences in female catch were
noted between 40.0 mg ethyl and propyl
lures. Establishing moth catch thresholds
based on female codling moth density
could be a useful approach to improve
management of this pest, especially in sex
pheromone-treated orchards (Knight
2002b). In addition, initiating predictive
timing models of egg hatch based on a
“Biofix” of first female moth catch could
improve current models. Incorporating
these kairomone-baited traps in the inte-
grated management of codling moth will
require additional testing and refinement.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Brad
Christianson and Duane Larson (U.S.D.A.,
Agricultural Research Service, Wapato,
WA) for their help in setting up plots and
collecting data. We appreciate the synthe-
sis of the propyl isomer and the supply of
septa for both ester isomers provided by
Trécé Inc., Salinas, CA. Helpful comments
were provided on an earlier draft by Tom
Unruh, U.S.D.A., Wapato, WA; Harvey
Reissig, Cornell University, Geneva, NY;
Richard Hilton, Oregon State University,
Medford, OR; Jim Hanson, U.S.D.A., Wa-
pato, WA; John Hardman, Agricultural
Canada, Kentville, Nova Scotia; Henry
Hogmire, West Virginia University, Kear-
neysville, WV; and Chris Maier, Connecti-
cut Agricultural Experiment Station, New
Haven, CT. This work was partially sup-
ported by the Washington Tree Fruit Re-
search Commission, Wenatchee, WA.
REFERENCES
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7. Tallahassee, FL.
Charmillot, P.J. 1990. Mating disruption technique to control codling moth in WesternSwitzerland, pp.
165-182. In R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein and M.N. Inscoe (eds.), Behavior-modifying chemicals
for insect pest management. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Creveling, R.K. and W.G. Jennings. 1970. Volatile components of Bartlett pear. Journal of Agriculture
and Food Chemistry 18: 19-24.
Gut, L.J. and J.F. Brunner. 1996. Implementing codling moth mating disruption in Washington pome fruit
orchards. Tree Fruit Research Extension Center Information Series, No. 1. Washington State Univer-
sity. Wenatchee, WA.
Heinz, D.E., M.R. Sevenants, and W.G. Jennings. 1966. Preparation of fruit essences for gas chromatogra-
phy. Journal of Food Science 31: 63-68.
Jennings, W.G., R.K. Creveling, and D.E. Heinz. 1964. Volatile esters of Bartlett pear. IV. Esters of
52 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
trans:2-cis:4-decadienoic acid. Journal of Food Science 29: 730-734.
Knight, A.L. 2002a. A comparison of gray halo-butyl elastomer and red rubber septa to monitor codling
moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in sex pheromone-treated orchards. Journal of the Entomological
Society of British Columbia 99: 123-132.
Knight, A.L. 2002b. Using the kairomone lure, DA2313 to monitor codling moth in apple and pear, p. 27.
In Proceedings, Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, 9-11 January 2002.
Portland , OR.
Knight, A.L. and D.M. Light. 2001. Attractants from ‘Bartlett’ pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella
(L.), larvae. Naturwissenschaften 88:339-342.
Knight, A.L., R.P.J. Potting and D.M. Light. 2002. Modeling the impact of a sex pheromone/kairomone
attracticide for management of codling moth (Cydia pomonella). Acta Hort 584: 215-220.
Knight, A.L., P. VanBuskirk, R. Hilton, B Zoller, and D.M. Light. 2005. Monitoring codling moth
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in four cultivars of pear. Acta Hort. (in press).
Light, D.M., A.L. Knight, C.A. Henrick, D. Rajapaska, B. Lingren, J.C. Dickens, K.M.Reynolds, R.G.
Buttery, G. Merrill, J. Roitman and B.C. Campbell. 2001. A pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal
potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). Naturwissenschaften
88:333-338.
Miller, R.L., D.D. Bills, and R.G. Buttery. 1989. Volatile components from Bartlett and Bradford pear
leaves. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 37: 1476-1479.
Riedl, H., B.A. Croft, and A.J. Howitt. 1976. Forecasting codling moth phenology based on pheromone
trap catches and physiological-time models. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 449-460.
Riedl, H., J.F. Howell, P.S. McNally, and P.H. Westigard. 1986. Codling moth management, use and
standardization of pheromone trapping systems. University of California Bulletin 1918. Berkeley, CA.
Scutareanu, P., B. Drukker, J. Bruin, M.A. Posthumus, and M.W. Sabelis. 1997. Volatiles from Psylla-
infested pear trees and their possible involvement in attraction of Anthocorid predators. Journal of
Chemical Ecology 23: 2241-2260.
Shiota, H. 1990. Changes in the volatile composition of La France pear during maturation. Journal of
Science and Food Agriculture 52: 421-429
Zoller, B.G. and A.M. Zoller. 2003. Comparison of kairomone DA 2313 and pheromone lure trapping for
codling moth with oviposition monitoring, p. 22. Jn Proceedings, Western Orchard Pest and Disease
Management Conference, 15-17 January 2003, Portland, OR.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 53
Use of Ethyl] (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth
Management: Stimulation of Oviposition
A.L. KNIGHT! and D.M. LIGHT?
ABSTRACT
The effect of the pear volatile, ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (Et-£,Z-DD), on oviposition
by codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), was evaluated in a series of choice and no-
choice laboratory experiments and in subsequent field tests conducted in apple and wal-
nut. Gray halobutyl elastomer septa loaded with 1.0 and 100.0 wg Et-E,Z-DD signifi-
cantly increased the numbers of eggs laid by a laboratory population in 96 h no-choice
assays by 2-fold. In addition, the number of eggs laid near the Et-E£,Z-DD versus a sol-
vent blank dispenser was significantly higher in choice bioassays across a similar range
of septa loadings. Oviposition rates by a field-collected post-diapause strain of codling
moth were significantly increased by the addition of a 1.0-ug septa versus a solvent
blank dispenser in a no-choice bioassay. Field trials were conducted in apple and walnut
to develop an artificial egg trap baited with Et-E,Z-DD to monitor codling moth oviposi-
tion. Septa loaded with 0.1 to 10.0 mg did not significantly increase oviposition versus
solvent blank dispensers on a Mylar plastic collar trap or on the adjacent leaves and fruit
in apple. Significantly more eggs were laid on the fruit and foliage than on the plastic
collar. No eggs were deposited on non-bearing apple shoots baited with 0.1 — 40.0 mg
Et-E,Z-DD septa. Similarly, no eggs were deposited on cylindrical wax paper-covered
plastic traps baited with 10.0 pg to 1.0 mg Et-E£,Z-DD septa in walnut orchards. The
potential of Et-E,Z-DD to monitor codling moth’s oviposition in the field, stimulate
oviposition by field-collected strains under laboratory conditions, and to improve pest
control by disrupting host location are discussed.
Key Words: Cydia pomonella, oviposition, kairomone, phenology, egg trap
INTRODUCTION
Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is_ typically
monitored in fruit and nut orchards with
sex pheromone-baited traps. The numbers
and timing of male moths captured in these
traps is used to infer the density of female
moths and timing of oviposition (Ried] and
Croft 1974, Riedl et al. 1976). The devel-
opment of an effective, inexpensive tool to
directly monitor the density of codling
moth females and/or oviposition could
improve its management. The sesquiter-
pene, (£,£)-a-farnesene (£,E£-aF), a major
constituent of apple fruit and leaf odors,
was identified as a key adult and larval
attractant for codling moth (Sutherland ef
al. 1974) and was shown to stimulate ovi-
position 1n both choice and no-choice labo-
ratory bioassays (Wearing and Hutchins
1973). Unfortunately, E,E-aF is unstable
in the presence of oxygen and has a very
short residual activity (Anet 1969). Field
trials evaluating the stimulatory effect of
E,E-aF on codling moth oviposition have
not been reported.
Direct monitoring of codling moth egg
density in orchards through foliage and
fruit sampling is labor intensive and often
ineffective due to the relatively low popu-
lation density of this pest in commercial
orchards (Elkins 2002). A novel approach
to monitor codling moth egg density in
'Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 5230 Konnowac Pass
Rd., Wapato, WA 98951
* Western Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Albany, CA 94710
54 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
California pear orchards has recently been
reported that uses the artificially cutting or
damaging of fruit (Zoller and Zoller 2001).
Pear clusters containing one cut-fruit (2.0-
3.0 cm wedge cut 0.5-1.0 cm deep) were
95-times more likely to contain a codling
moth egg than normal fruit clusters. Yet, a
number of factors increase the variability
of this approach including cultivar and
days before harvest, i.e., Bosc pear clusters
were more attractive than Bartlett; and the
attractiveness of cut- versus uncut-fruit
was only significantly different during the
month before harvest (Zoller 2001). Unfor-
tunately, the incidence of eggs among the
cut-fruit cluster samples in commercial
pear orchards was low (< 1.0%), and the
utility of this labor-intensive approach for
improving the management of codling
moth is unclear (Zoller and Zoller 2001).
Light et al. (2001) and Knight and
Light (2001) found that ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate (Et-£,Z-DD), a_ principal
odorant from ripe pear (Jennings ef al.
1964), was a potent adult and larval kairo-
monal attractant for codling moth. Et-F,Z-
DD appears to be chemically more stable
than E,E-oF and can be loaded in septa to
provide long-lasting, effective monitoring
of adult populations (Light ef al. 2001;
Knight et al. 2005). The potential effects
of Et-E,Z-DD on oviposition of codling
moth have not been reported. Herein, we
report on the effects of Et-E,Z-DD on cod-
ling moth oviposition under laboratory
conditions and evaluate its use as a lure to
monitor egg laying in apple and walnut
orchards.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Choice and no-choice laboratory ex-
periments. Moths 24-48 hr old were ob-
tained from a laboratory colony reared on
artificial diet (Toba and Howell 1991) at
the U.S.D.A. Yakima Agricultural Re-
search Laboratory in Wapato, WA. Indi-
vidual virgin female moths were paired
with two male moths for 24 h at 25 °C, >
40% R.H., and a 16:8 L:D photoperiod.
Females were then placed in screened (3 x
3 mm) cylindrical cages (11 cm long and 9
cm diameter). Both ends of each cage
were capped with a plastic cover lined with
wax paper. Gray halobutyl elastomer septa
(No. 1888, size No. 1,West Co., Phoenix-
ville. PA) were pinned to the wax paper at
each end of the cage. A 10.0% honey water
wick was inserted into the middle of each
cage.
Choice and no-choice tests were con-
ducted with septa loaded with 1.0 and
100.0 pg Et-£,Z-DD (93.7% A.L, Trécé
Inc., Adair, OK) versus septa treated only
with the solvent, dichloromethane as a
blank. In choice tests an Et-E,Z-DD-loaded
septa and a solvent blank septa were
pinned to the wax paper at opposite ends of
the cage. Identical lures were pinned at
each end of the cage in the no-choice tests.
Tests were run for 96 h inside greenhouses
maintained between 20 — 25 °C. Cages
were spaced > 5 m apart and no more than
four replicates were run on each of six
dates. An additional no-choice test was
conducted with 1.0 ug Et-£,Z-DD septa
versus a solvent control septa using moths
reared from an overwintering population
collected as larvae the previous season in
corrugated bands attached to apple trees.
Larvae had been maintained under dia-
pause conditions (2 °C and total darkness)
for five months and were allowed to
emerge in rooms maintained at 25 °C, 16:8
L:D and > 45% R.H. The numbers of eggs
laid on each wax paper cap were counted
in all experiments and females were dis-
sected to determine their mating status.
Only data from mated females were in-
cluded in the statistical analyses (15 — 20
replicates per comparison).
Development of an egg trap. Studies
were conducted in a greenhouse to develop
a suitable substrate for an artificial egg
trap. The suitability of waxed cardboard
and Mylar plastic as sites of codling moth
Oviposition were compared with natural
apple leaves. Three mated females (< 72 h
old) were placed inside of screened cages
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
with a 1.2 m potted apple seedling. Artifi-
cial substrates were cut to mimic a typical
leaf shape (19.8 cm’) and were clipped to
the main stem of the plant. In the first test
we compared oviposition on the plastic
versus the waxed cardboard substrate. The
height of each type of artificial leaf was
alternated on the seedling at 0.7 and 1.0 m,
and six replicate cages were evaluated
from 14 — 19 March 2001. In a second
test, we compared oviposition on a se-
lected apple leaf on the seedling versus a
similar-sized plastic leaf. Both the natural
and artificial leaves were positioned on the
seedling at a height of 1.0 m and on oppo-
site sides of the shoot. Twenty-four cage
replicates of this test were conducted be-
tween 23 March and 26 April 2001. The
number of eggs on each artificial and natu-
ral apple leaf was counted after 5 d.
Field evaluation of egg traps in apple.
Studies were conducted in an unsprayed
‘Red Delicious’ apple orchard situated
near Parker Heights, WA from 18 — 29
May 2001. Square plastic sheets (0.1 m’)
were slit and folded as collars around fruit
and foliage clusters and baited with either
0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 mg Et-£,Z-DD lures or an
unbaited solvent-only lure (nine replicates
per treatment). Baited trees were spaced >
20 m apart and traps were placed in the
upper third of the canopy. Fruit monitor-
ing indicated that no fruit injury was pre-
sent in the orchard when the experiment
was Started. Fruit and leaf clusters were
removed after 7 d and plastic collars, fruits
and leaves were then examined in the labo-
ratory for codling moth eggs and injury. A
second test was conducted from 5 —- 11
June 2001 in another unsprayed ‘Red Dell-
cious’ apple orchard situated near Moxee,
WA using the plastic collar trap baited
with either 3.0 mg Et-£,Z-DD or solvent-
only lures. Twenty replicates of each lure
type were placed on shoots with and with-
out fruit. Only uninjured fruit clusters were
used in this study. Collars, foliage, and
fruit were examined for eggs after 6 d.
Eggs in both studies were categorized into
developmental stages based on their mor-
phology (Richardson et al. 1982). Only
3D
‘white’ eggs and ‘red ring’ eggs character-
ized as having only one visible stemmata
(< stage 11) were scored as having been
laid during each test.
A third apple trial was conducted dur-
ing 2002 in the Moxee apple orchard to
examine if oviposition could be stimulated
to occur on non-bearing shoots baited with
Et-E,Z-DD lures. Septa loaded with either
1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 20.0, or 40.0 mg Et-E,Z-DD
and solvent-only septa (10 replicates per
treatment) were pinned to non-bearing
shoots on 15 June. One septum was at-
tached per tree and baited-trees were
spaced 5 — 6 m apart. Five replicates of
each lure loading were collected after 10 d
and the rest were collected after 20 d. All
shoots were examined for hatched and
unhatched eggs. Two Et-£,Z-DD-baited
sticky delta-shaped traps (Trécé Inc.,
Adair, OK) were used to monitor the activ-
ity of female codling moths in this orchard
during this test. In addition, 30 randomly
selected fruit from 20 trees situated within
100 m of the center of the study site were
inspected for codling moth injury at the
end of this test to assess pest pressure.
Field evaluation of egg traps in wal-
nut. Studies were conducted from mid-
June through September 2002 in a
‘Chandler’ walnut orchard (Dixon, CA)
characterized as having a moderate codling
moth population density based on early-
season moth catches in sex pheromone-
baited traps. An oviposition trap was con-
structed using a plastic sheet (21.0 x 28.0
cm) covered with wax paper on both sides.
The plastic sheet was rolled into a 9 cm
diameter tube, then secured and hung hori-
zontally by a wire trap hanger. Septa im-
pregnated with either 10.0, 100.0, or
1,000.0 ug Et-E,Z-DD or solvent-only
were attached by a plastic septa holder
from the center of the inner tube of the
trap. Traps were hung in the upper third
of the 8.0 m canopy and baited trees were
separated by 80 m. Three replicate blocks
were established within three orchards (9
replicates of each lure rate). Traps were
checked weekly for eggs and septa were
replaced every two weeks. In July, a 500-
56 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
nut sample was collected from the canopy
in each replicate block and examined for
codling moth injury.
Statistical analysis. The total number
of eggs laid in cages baited either with Et-
E,Z-DD or solvent-only septa in choice
and non-choice tests were compared with
paired and unpaired t tests, respectively, at
a P< 0.05 level of significance (Analytical
Software 2000). A paired t-test was used to
compare the suitability of substrates for
Oviposition in the greenhouse studies.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used
to evaluate the influence of lure loading
rate on oviposition on Mylar traps and as-
sociated fruit and foliage in apple and to
compare oviposition on the Mylar collar
versus fruit and foliage. Mean separation
following a significant ANOVA was deter-
mined with a LSD test, P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Choice and no-choice laboratory ex-
periments. Septa loaded with Et-£,Z-DD
significantly increased oviposition by a
laboratory strain of codling moth in green-
house tests in both choice and no-choice
tests with lures baited with 1.0 and 100.0
ug Et-E,Z-DD versus solvent-only lures
(Table 1). The mean number of eggs laid
on wax paper next to the kairomone lure
was 2-5 fold higher than next to a blank
lure in choice-tests. In addition, approxi-
mately 2-fold more eggs were laid in cages
baited with Et-E,Z-DD lures versus with
solvent-only lures in no-choice tests.
Field-collected codling moth females laid
twice the number of eggs in cages baited
with Et-£,Z-DD than in cages baited with
the solvent control (Table 1).
Development of an egg trap. No dif-
ference was found in the number of eggs
laid on the waxed cardboard leaf-model
(mean + SE = 9.7 + 2.5) versus the plastic
leaf-model (mean + SE = 8.3 + 2.3) (t =
0.39, df = 10, P= 0.71). The Mylar plastic
leaf-model was chosen for subsequent field
tests due to its greater stability when ex-
posed to adverse field conditions, 1.e. pre-
cipitation. However, significantly more
eggs were deposited on the apple leaf
(mean + SE = 9.6 + 2.4) versus the plastic
leaf-models (mean + SE = 4.3 + 1.2) (t=-
3.73, df = 46, P< 0.001).
Field evaluation of egg traps in apple.
The mean + SE number of fruit within the
Mylar collar trap in the May 2001 test was
2.9 + 0.3 and there was no significant dif-
ference in fruit density among lure treat-
ments, F = 0.35; df = 3, 32; P= 0.79. The
mean + SE number of eggs that had al-
ready been deposited (> stage 11 plus
hatched eggs) on the fruit and foliage sur-
rounded by the Mylar collar was 1.3 + 0.3
per cluster. There was no significant differ-
ence in the mean density of already depos-
ited eggs among lure treatments in this test,
F = 0.93; df = 3, 32; P = 0.44. Few new
eggs (< stage 11) were laid on either the
Mylar trap or the associated foliage and
fruit during the May 2001 field experiment
(Table 2). Total egg density on the Mylar,
foliage, and fruit did not differ among lure
types, F = 0.87; df = 3, 32, P = 0.47. Sig-
nificantly more eggs were laid on the foli-
age and fruit than on the Mylar plastic col-
lar across all lure loadings and the solvent
blank, F = 5.69; df = 1, 70; P< 0.05. An
average of 23% of the fruit within the My-
lar collars were injured at the end of the
experiment.
No eggs were deposited on Mylar col-
lars or foliage in non-bearing shoots baited
with either the 3.0 mg Et-£,Z-DD or a
blank lure in the June 2001 test. Similarly,
no eggs were deposited on the Mylar col-
lars surrounding fruit. The mean + SE
number of fruit within the Mylar collar
trap was 2.4 + 0.1 and there was no signifi-
cant difference in fruit density between
lure treatments on fruit-bearing shoots, F =
0.29; df = 1, 38; P = 0.59. The mean + SE
number of eggs that had already been de-
posited (> stage 11 plus hatched eggs) on
the fruit and foliage surrounded by the
Mylar collar was 1.2 + 0.3 per cluster.
There was no significant difference in the
mean density of already deposited eggs
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
a7
Table 1.
The effects of ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate loaded in gray halobutyl elastomer septa on egg
laying of mated codling moth in choice and non-choice laboratory tests conducted for 96 h.
Test Type Treatment No. replicates
Choice 100.0 pg 18
Blank
Choice 1.0 pg 20
Blank
No-choice 100.0 pg 20
Blank
No-choice 1.0 pg 20
Blank
No-choice’ 1.0 pg 15
Blank
Mean + SE no. eggs Statistical test '
laid per cage P-value
210 te3.7 = 0,05
11.6+3.4
25-0252 < 0.001
44+1.4
31.0+3.4 < 0.001
14.2+2.8
21. < 0.05
1232 3:0
13.1+3.8 < 0.05
Ded eae
' A paired and unpaired t-test were used to analyze data from the choice and no-choice tests,
respectively.
* Field collected adults reared from pupae collected in corrugated bands placed in an unsprayed
apple orchard.
Table 2.
Density of codling moth eggs deposited on Mylar traps and associated fruit and leaf clusters
baited with ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate or a solvent-only lure in an apple orchard during May
(nine replicates per lure) and June (20 replicates per lure) 2001.
Mean + SE no. eggs laid on
Lure load (mg) Mylar collar Foliage and fruit Both
May 2001
Solvent only 010-011 0.22 + 0.15 0.33 + 0.17
0.1 0.00 + 0.00 0.33 + 0.17 0.33 +0.17
1.0 0.00 + 0.00 L.11+0.59 LIT 0.59
10.0 0.22 + 0.15 0.44 + 0.34 0.67 + 0.47
June 2001
Solvent only 0.00 + 0.00 0.10+0.10 0.10+0.10
3.0 0.00 + 0.00 0.35 + 0.17 0.35+0.17
between lure treatments on fruit-bearing
shoots in this test, F = 1.18; df= 1, 38; P=
0.28. The number of eggs laid on foliage
and fruit in collars baited with a 3.0 mg
versus the solvent-only lure was not sig-
nificant (F = 1.66; df = 1, 38; P = 0.21).
An average of 11% of the fruit within My-
lar collars were injured at the end of the
experiment.
No eggs were deposited on non-bearing
apple shoots baited with Et-E,Z-DD or the
solvent control lures during the 2002
study. The mean + SE capture of female
codling moth in sticky traps baited with a
Et-E,Z-DD lure was 0.3 + 0.1 moths per
night. Fruit injury by codling moth on a
sample of trees within 100 m of the study
site averaged 18.7% in mid July.
Field evaluation of egg traps in wal-
nut. No eggs were laid on the wax paper-
covered plastic tube traps placed in walnut
orchards during the 14 wk study. How-
58 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
ever, the population of codling moth in this
orchard was moderate to high. Nut damage
in July averaged 3.0% in canopy samples.
In addition, traps baited with both sex
pheromone and Et-£,Z-DD lures caught a
large number of moths, 3 — 6 moths per
trap per night during the test. Codling moth
adults were observed on several occasions
resting on the plastic egg traps.
DISCUSSION
Our studies to develop an effective
monitoring trap for codling moth oviposi-
tion with Et-£,Z-DD in apple and walnut
were largely unsuccessful. Mylar and
waxed paper were poor artificial substrates
for oviposition by codling moth compared
with fruit and foliage. Despite working in
orchards with relatively very high popula-
tion densities of codling moth (levels of
fruit and nut injury > 3.0%), rates of ovi-
position on fruit and leaves were low, and
the addition of a Et-£,Z-DD lure did not
significantly increase the number of eggs
deposited. Baiting non-bearing shoots with
Et-E,Z-DD lures did not stimulate oviposi-
tion.
Several factors likely contribute to the
difficulty in developing an effective egg
trap for codling moth. The density of cod-
ling moth eggs in most commercial or-
chards is very low and a large number of
traps may be necessary to detect oviposi-
tion (Zoller and Zoller 2001). Females
typically deposit eggs near or on fruit clus-
ters that emit E,E-aF and other volatiles
that stimulate oviposition (Sutherland ef al.
1974). It is unclear whether adding a Et-
E,Z-DD lure could further increase this
stimulation. For example, the addition of
Et-E£,Z-DD to an attractive blend of E,E-aF
and (£)-6-farnesene did enhance male up-
wind flight but not ‘landing at source’ in
flight tunnel studies (Coracini et al. 2004).
Studies addressing the influence of these
volatile blends on short-range female ori-
entation and oviposition have not been
conducted. The cut-pear method is the only
study that has stimulated codling moth
oviposition in the field with the addition of
kairomones (Zoller 2001), but the blend of
volatiles and their emission rates from arti-
ficially injured pears has not been charac-
terized. While a wide range of Et-E,Z-DD
lure loadings was evaluated in our studies
we have not compared the emission rate of
Et-E,Z-DD from cut pears versus these
synthetic lures. Very low Et-E,Z-DD lure
loadings (1.0 — 100.0 ug) stimulated ovi-
position under laboratory conditions. How-
ever, higher rates of Et-E,Z-DD (> 1.0 mg)
are needed to attract adequate numbers of
female moths to traps under field condi-
tions (Light et al. 2001). The successful
development of an egg trap for codling
moth must consider the trade-off between
increasing the number of eggs laid on or
near the trap (short-range stimulation) ver-
sus increasing the likelihood of detecting a
single egg near or on the trap (long-range
attraction). The complexity of visual and
olfactory cues that may stimulate short-
range host location behaviors in codling
moth is not well understood.
Additional factors associated with de-
veloping a practical egg-monitoring pro-
gram for codling moth should be consid-
ered. Lombarkia and Derridj (2002) found
that several primary water-soluble metabo-
lites (sugar alcohols and sugars) isolated
from apple leaves and fruits stimulated
Oviposition by codling moth. Whether the
suitability of a plastic surface might be
improved or the leaf and fruit surfaces en-
hanced by the addition of these or other
chemicals should be investigated. Micro-
encapsulated formulations of Et-£,Z-DD
alone and in blends with other attractive
volatiles could be applied to fruit clusters
to create attractive point sources. Other
physical aspects of the trap could be im-
proved to increase oviposition, such as
providing grooves or folds in the trap’s
surface and the influence of trap color
(Knight and Miliczky 2003).
The attraction of codling moth adults
and neonates plus the stimulation of ovi-
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
position by Et-£,Z-DD could be utilized to
improve management of this pest (Light er
al. 2001; Knight and Light 2001). Labora-
tory studies with Et-E,Z-DD have exam-
ined the use of a paste formulation laced
with insecticides applied as coarse droplets
to control larvae (A. L. K., unpublished
data). The use of attractive kill stations for
females has been evaluated in field trials
and offers promise (Knight et a/. 2002).
Hughes et al. (2003) evaluated the use of
apple odor and £,F-aF to disrupt host
location of neonates and mated females in
laboratory trials. They suggest that natural
mortality of neonates could be increased
with a competitive kairomone-based ap-
proach. A similar design using Et-£,Z-DD
could be effective and should be further
evaluated.
a9
Another potential use of Et-£,Z-DD
can be to increase oviposition by post-
diapause field-collected strains of codling
moth. The overwintering generation of
field-collected populations of codling moth
typically has a much lower fecundity and
mating success under laboratory conditions
than either laboratory-adapted or summer
generation field-collected strains (Howell
1991). Increasing egg production of cod-
ling moth under laboratory conditions has
been facilitated by the addition of ripe ap-
ple fruits, water, or molasses baits (Van
Leeuwen 1947; Wearing ef al. 1973). The
use of a dry, long-lasting Et-£,Z-DD lure
to increase egg laying would facilitate in-
secticide-susceptibility testing of field
populations and in establishing laboratory
colonies (Knight ef a/. 2001).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Duane Larsen
and Brad Christianson (U.S.D.A., A.R.S.,
Wapato, WA) for their assistance in setting
up these experiments. Helpful comments
were provided by Dave Horton (U.S.D.A.,
A.R.S., Wapato, WA) and several anony-
mous reviewers. This research was par-
tially funded by the Washington Tree Fruit
Research Commission (Wenatchee, WA)
and the Walnut Marketing Board
(Sacramento, CA).
REFERENCES
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix7, Tallahassee, FI.
Anet, E.F. 1969. Autoxidation of a—farnesene. Australian Journal of Chemistry 22: 2403-2410.
Coracini, M., M. Bengtsson, I. Liblikas, and P. Witzgall. 2004. Attraction of codling moth males to apple
volatiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110: 1-10.
Elkins, R. 2002. Areawide implementation of mating disruption in pears using puffers. Pest Management
Grant Final Report No. 00-0198S. California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
Howell, J.F. 1991. Reproductive biology, pp. 157-174. Jn L.P.S. van der Geest and H.H. Evenhuis (eds.),
Tortricid pests: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hughes, W.O.H., D. Gailey, and J.J. Knapp. 2003. Host location by adult and larval codling moth and the
potential for its disruption by the application of kairomones. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
106: 147-153.
Jennings W.G., R.K. Creveling, and D.E. Heinz. 1964. Volatile esters of Bartlett pear. IV. Esters of
trans:2-cis:4-decadienoic acid. Journal of Food Science 29: 730-734.
Knight, A.L. and D.L. Light. 2001. Attractants from Bartlett pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)
larvae. Naturwissenschaften 88: 339-342.
Knight, A.L., J.E. Dunley, and R.K. Jansson. 2001. Baseline monitoring of codling moth (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae) larval response to benzoylhydrazine insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 94:
264-270.
Knight, A.L., R.P.J. Potting, and D.M. Light. 2002. Modeling the impact of a sex pheromone/kairomone
attracticide for management of codling moth (Cydia pomonella). Acta Horticulturae 584: 215-220.
Knight, A.L. and E. Miliczky. 2003. Influence of trap colour on the capture of codling moth (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae), honeybees, and non-target flies. Journal of the Entomological Society British Columbia
100: 65-70.
Knight, A.L., P. VanBuskirk, R.J. Hilton, B.G. Zoller, and D.M. Light. 2005. Monitoring codling moth in
60 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
four pear cultivars with the pear ester. Acta Horticulturae (in press).
Light, D.M., A.L. Knight, R.G. Buttery, C.A. Henrick, D. Rajapaska, K.M. Reynolds, G. Merrill, J. Roit-
man, J.C. Dickens, W. Lingren, and B.C. Campbell. 2001. Ethyl (2E, 4Z)-2,4-decadienoate: a pear-
derived kairomone with pheromonal potency attracts both sexes of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L.
Naturwissenschaften 88: 333-338.
Lombarkia, N. and S. Derridj. 2002. Incidence of apple fruit and leaf surface metabolites on Cydia pomo-
nella oviposition. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104: 79-87.
Richardson, J.C., C.D. Jorgensen, and B.A. Croft. 1982. Embryogenesis of the codling moth, Laspeyresia
pomonella: use in validating phenology models. Annals Entomological Society of America 75: 201-
209.
Riedl, H. and B.A. Croft. 1974. A study of pheromone trap catches in relation to codling moth damage.
The Canadian Entomologist 106: 525-537.
Riedl, H., B.A. Croft, and A.J. Howitt. 1976. Forecasting codling moth phenology based on pheromone
trap catches and physiological time models. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 449-460.
Sutherland, O.R.W., R.F.N. Hutchins, and C.H. Wearing. 1974. The role of the hydrocarbon a-farnesene
in the behaviour of codling moth larvae and adults, pp. 249-263. Jn: L. Barton Browne, ed. Experi-
mental analysis of insect behavior. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Toba, H.H. and J.F. Howell. 1991. An improved system for mass-rearing codling moth. Journal of the
Entomological Society of British Columbia 88: 22-27.
Van Leeuwen, E.R. 1947. Increasing production of codling moth eggs in an oviposition chamber. Journal
of Economic Entomology 40: 744-45.
Wearing, C.H. and R.F.N. Hutchins. 1973. a-Farnesene, a naturally occurring oviposition stimulant for
the codling moth, Laspeyresia pomonella. Journal of Insect Physiology 19: 1251-1256.
Zoller, B.G. 2001. Oviposition preference of codling moth between cut and uncut fruit of Bartlett, Bosc,
and Beurre Hardy cultivars in the Sacramento Valley. Proceedings of the Western Orchard Pest and
Disease Management Conference 75: 5-6.
Zoller, B.G. and A.M. Zoller. 2001. Biased sampling of codling moth oviposition using a cut fruit tech-
nique to monitor mating disruption in Bartlett pears. Proceedings of the Western Orchard Pest and
Disease Management Conference 75: 7-8.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 61
Use of Ethyl (£,2Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth
Management: Kairomone Species Specificity
A.L. KNIGHT! and D.M. LIGHT’
ABSTRACT
Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (pear ester) 1s a kairomonal attractant for both male and
female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in apple, pear and walnut. Studies were
conducted in the western Untied States to evaluate the potential attractiveness of this
kairomone for eight lepidopteran pests of these three crops, as well as, in cherry, peach/
nectarine, apricot, plum, almond, pistachio, grape, kiwi, and citrus. The pear ester was
loaded (10.0 mg) into gray halobutyl septa and insects were monitored with diamond- or
delta-shaped sticky traps. Lures were not attractive to peach twig borer, Anarsia
lineatella (Zeller); oriental fruit moth, Cydia molesta (Busck); omnivorous leafroller,
Platynota stultana Walshingham; navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker);
apple fruitworm, Lacanobia subjuncta (Grote & Robinson); pandemis leafroller, Pan-
demis pyrusana (Kearfott); obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris);
and western tentiform leafminer, Phy/lonorycter mespiella (Hiiebner). Additional stud-
ies with C. molesta populations attacking apple and pear would be useful.
Key Words: Cydia pomonella, Cydia molesta, pear ester, host plant volatiles, monitor-
ing
INTRODUCTION
Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), is
the key pest of pears, apples, and walnuts
worldwide (Barnes 1991). Identification of
the pear ester, ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-
decadienoate, as a kairomone attractant for
adult and larval stages of codling moth has
allowed the development of several new
approaches to successfully monitor and
manage this pest (Light ef a/. 2001, Knight
and Light 2001; Knight et a/. 2002; Knight
et al. 2005). Pear ester is a characteristic
volatile of ripe pear (Jennings eft al. 1964)
and has not been detected in headspace
volatiles of unripe pear fruit and is not
known to be present in pear leaves (Shiota
1990, Miller et a/. 1989) or in walnut fruit
or leaves (Buttery et a/. 2000). However, it
has been detected as a minor constituent in
ripe ‘Red Delicious’ apple (Berger et al.
1984) and in quince (Schimizu and Yoshi-
hara 1977).
The attractiveness of pear ester for in-
sects other than codling moth has been
reported. The yellowjacket wasp Vespula
vidua (Saussure) was caught in low num-
bers in traps baited with pear ester (Day
and Jeanne 2001); and higher lure loadings
(> 40.0 mg) in gray halobutyl elastomer
septa are attractive to the western yellow
jacket, Vespula pennsylvanic (Saussure) 1n
apple (ALK, unpublished data). Low num-
bers of adult stink bugs, Fuschistus
conspersus Uhler, have occasionally been
observed in or near traps baited with >
20.0 mg pear ester septa (ALK and DML,
unpublished data).
The attractiveness of pear ester to other
lepidopteran species has also been re-
ported. Two polyphagous tortricid species,
Hedya nubiferana Haworth and Cydia fa-
"Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 5230 Konnowac Pass
Rd., Wapato, WA 98951
7USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Western Regional Research Center, 800 Buchanan St., Albany,
CA 94710
62 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
giglandana (Zeller), were caught in traps
baited with pear ester in Swedish apple
orchards (Coracini et al. 2004) and in a
mixed apple and cherry orchard in Italy
(Schmidt et a/. 2004). In addition, the pest
species, Cydia splendana (Hiibner) was
caught in traps baited with pear ester in
chestnut orchards (Schmidt e¢ a/. 2004).
The attractiveness of pear ester to lepi-
dopteran pests sympatric with codling
moth in pome fruits and walnuts in western
North America has not been studied. This
complex of pest species includes tortricid
leafrollers, noctuid fruitworms and cut-
worms, and gracillarid leafminers (Beers ef
al. 1993; VanBuskirk et al. 1999). Six tor-
tricid leafroller species feed on the devel-
oping buds, leaves, and external surface of
apple and pear fruit: Choristoneura
rosaceana (Harris), Pandemis pyrusana
(Kearfott), Platynota stultana Walshing-
ham, Archips rosanus (L.), Argyvrotaenia
citrana (Fernald), and Archips argy-
rospilus (Walker). The western tentiform
leafminer, Phyllonorycter mespiella
(Hiiebner), 1s a common indirect gracillarid
feeding beneath the epidermis of apple and
pear leaves but causing little economic
damage to the crop. Several cutworm and
fruitworm noctuid species including Xestia
c-nigrum (L.) and Lacanobia subjuncta
(Grote & Robinson), are occasional pests
of apple and pear orchards and feed on
buds, leaves, and fruit (Barnett et al. 1991;
Landolt 1998). The oriental fruit moth,
Cydia molesta (Busck), is a key pest of
stone fruits attacking both developing
shoots and fruits (Rothschild and Vickers
1991). However, this species has expanded
its host range recently and has become a
significant pest of apple and pear in some
geographical regions (Civolani et al. 1998;
Usmani and Shearer 2001; IVichev ef al.
2003).
Many of these lepidopteran pest species
of pome fruit have a broad host range that
can include cherry, peach/nectarine, grape,
citrus, kiwi, and pistachio, as well as un-
cultivated hosts (Barnett et a/. 1991; Beers
et al. 1993). Host races of codling moth are
reported to sporadically attack other crops
such as plum, apricot, and almonds
(Barnes 1991) and have been reported to
attack cherry (Mote 1926). Within these
crops other important lepidopteran pests
can occur. The navel orangeworm, Amye-
lois transitella (Walker), attacks walnuts,
pistachios, and almonds (Barnett ef al.
1991). The peach twig borer, Anarsia
lineatella (Zeller), is another key pest dam-
aging shoots and fruits of almonds and
stone fruits (Barnes et al. 1993).
The objective of this study was to
evaluate the attractiveness of pear ester for
eight important lepidopteran pests that are
sympatric with codling moth among sev-
eral host crops in Washington and Califor-
nia. In addition, the attractiveness of pear
ester for P. stultana, C. molesta, and A.
lineatella was evaluated across a range of
crops that are not hosts for codling moth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specificity Studies in Washington.
Studies were conducted in apple (n = 15),
pear (n = 10), cherry (n = 5), and peach (n
= 10) orchards during 1999 to evaluate the
species specificity of pear ester. Groups of
three diamond-shaped _ sticky traps
(Pherocon IIB, Trécé Inc., Adair, OK)
baited with gray halobutyl elastomer septa
(No. 1888, size No. 1, West Co., Phoenix-
ville, PA) loaded with either 10.0 mg pear
ester (93.7% A.I. purity, Aldrich Chemical,
Minneapolis, MN), sex pheromone
(proprietary loading, Trécé Inc., Adair,
OK), or a hexane solvent were spaced
more than 50 m apart and hung in the up-
per third of the canopy within each or-
chard. Studies were conducted in apple,
pear, cherry and peach orchards located
near Moxee, Wapato, and Brewster WA.
Lacanobia_ subjuncta and P. mespiella
were each monitored simultaneously in 10
pear orchards from 9 — 23 August and in
10 apple orchards from 16 — 30 August.
Traps baited with the sex pheromone of P.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
mespiella were not included in the pear
study. Pandemis pyrusana was monitored
in five apple and cherry blocks from 24 —
31 August. Choristoneura rosaceana was
monitored in five apple blocks from 9 — 16
September. Cydia molesta and A. lineatella
were monitored simultaneously in 10
peach orchards for 2 — 7 nights from 11
August to 7 September. Nontarget insects
caught in traps were counted and broadly
categorized by order (e.g. small dipterans,
dermapterans) or family or super family
(e.g. chrysopids, coccinellids, muscoid
flies). Numbers of adult white apple leaf-
hopper, Typhlocyba pomaria McAtee, and
codling moth were recorded for all traps in
apple and pear and for all crops, respec-
tively.
Specificity studies in California. Stud-
les were conducted from 18 August — 16
September 1999 in orchard blocks of
mixed cultivars of peach, apricot, plum,
almond, pistachio, grape, kiwi, and citrus
at the University of California campus in
Davis, CA; and at its germplasm repository
research station at Wolfskill in Winters,
CA. All crops except citrus were moni-
tored for P. stultana. Cydia molesta and A.
lineatella were monitored in all crops ex-
63
cept grape, kiwi and citrus. Amyelois tran-
sitella was present in the almond blocks
but was not specifically monitored due to
the ineffectiveness of the sex pheromone-
baited trap. Orchard blocks were moni-
tored with 10.0 mg pear ester, species’ sex
pheromone, and a trap baited with a sol-
vent blank lure placed in either wing-
shaped or diamond-shaped sticky traps
(Pherocon 1CP and IIB, Trécé Inc., Adair,
OK). Sex pheromone lures are commer-
cially available and were provided by
Trécé Inc. Traps were typically placed in
the mid canopy of orchards of each crop in
a randomized block design along 2 — 4
replicate orchard rows separated by 50 —
80 m.
Data analysis. Analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was used to detect significant
differences in mean moth catch per trap
per night among the sex pheromone, pear
ester, and solvent lures for each species, P
< 0.05 (Analytical Software 2000). Means
in significant ANOVA’s were separated
with a least significant difference test. A
paired t-test was used to compare the catch
of selected nontarget insects in traps baited
with pear ester or blank septa.
RESULTS
Specificity studies in Washington.
Species-specific sex pheromone-baited
traps caught male P. pyrusana, C.
rosaceana, L. subjuncta, P. mespiella, A.
lineatella, and C. molesta across apple,
pear, cherry, and peach orchards (Table 1).
Mean daily moth catches in these sex
pheromone-baited traps were significantly
higher than moth catches in traps baited
with pear ester or with blank lures. No
differences occurred in the catch of each of
these species in any crop between traps
baited with pear ester and blank lure-baited
traps. Low numbers of codling moth were
caught per day in traps baited with pear
ester in apple (0.24 + 0.04) (mean + SEM),
pear (0.10 + 0.06), cherry (0.03 + 0.03),
and peach (0.17 + 0.13), indicating the
pear ester lures were active.
Various other insect species were
caught in sticky traps baited with sex
pheromones, pear ester, or a blank lure:
including low sporadic numbers of ear-
wigs, lacewings, ladybird beetles, micro-
hymenopterans, and various species of
bees. Small dipteran species were com-
monly caught in traps though generally in
low numbers. The two most common non-
targets in apple and pear blocks in Wash-
ington during these trials were muscoid
flies (means of 4 — 5 flies per trap) and
white apple leafhopper, 7. pomaria
(means of 12 — 13 adults per trap). How-
ever, no significant difference in their den-
sities were found in traps baited with either
pear ester or blank lures for either group,
P’s = 0.48 and 0.61, respectively (paired t-
tests).
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
64
1S91. UST S0°0> d ‘WosajsIp APPUBOTJIUBIS o19M Joo] JUOIOJJIP B Aq PAMOT[OJ SUBSUT MOY |
600 > :LZ ‘7°69
100'0 > :LZ ‘7 :06'1I
IL'0=:81 ‘1-710
100'0 > ‘LZ ‘7 :0'v18
100°0 > “LZ “7 :L'€S
1000 > :LZ “7 0°71
1000 > :ZI “7 :8°S7Z
10'0 > :ZI ‘7 -€v'8
100'0 > :ZI °7 :0'°7EI
onea-q ‘Jp conjea-Y
‘VAONV
q0°0 + 0'0
q10+1'0
10+ 70
qWIT+6€
47200 + Z0'0
qZ0'0 + €0'0
400°0 + 00'0
qZ0'0 + Z0'0
q90°0 + 80'0
quel
q0°0 + 00
q0'0 + 0'0
€0+60
Qe1+Le
q00°0 + 00°0
900°0 + 00'0
400°0 + 00'0
q00°0 + 00°0
400°0 + 00'0
quowlo19yd
19}SO B93
eLOFPIT (OL) Yovog pjsajout vipa)
ROr+ REIL (OL) yorod Djes0OUT] DISADUY
- (Ql) sVd9g = Dpjaidsaw sajaAsouopjAyd
W761 +9'ESS (OL) Addy vpjaidsau sajaduouopjAyd
PLIO+OI (OL) Ie pjouniqns vigouvdvT
R10+30 (Ol)aIddy ojaunlqns viqouvs0T
PV O+O0r (S)21ddy HuDadvsos DAnauUojsis0Yy)
PVT +rs. § (¢) Auayg pupsnidd siumapund
RPLOFOL (S) addy puvsnadd siumapung
(spreyoso
ale ‘ou) doi
otytoadsuos
so1sads sag
WYstu/den/syjow PAS + ued
WIG UOJSUTYse M Ul SpIeYyoIO JIN UL JIN] YUTQ & JO ‘(19)S9 Iead) a}eoudIpedap
“1 T(Zr'AT) [Ayo ‘ouowossyd xaos ortoodsuod ev JOYS YIM poyeq sden ul syjow jo soimded
a LAD
solvent-baited traps in any crop other than
low catches of codling moth in blocks of
peaches, almonds, and citrus more than
A.
California.
ies in
C. molesta, and P. stultana
Specificity stud
lineatella,
males were caught in sex pheromone-
100 m from pome fruit orchards. These
moth counts in the sex pheromone-baited
traps were all significantly different than
the zero catch in the pear ester-baited traps
(P’s < 0.01).
baited traps in peach, apricot, plum, al-
mond and pistachio orchards in California
(Table 2). In addition, male P. stultana
were trapped in grape and kiwi sites. No
moth species were caught in pear ester- or
DISCUSSION
pear (Knight ef a/. 2005). It also has dem-
onstrated potential to improve control via
The pear ester 1s a strong attractant for
codling moth adults and has improved
lure and kill approaches (Knight ef ai.
monitoring of this pest in walnut (Light ef
and disruption of oviposition
2002)
al. 2001), apple (Thwaite et a/. 2004), and
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
65
Table 2.
Captures of moths in traps baited with either a conspecific sex pheromone, ethyl (2F,4Z)-2,4-
decadienoate (pear ester), or a blank lure in fruit orchards and vineyards 1n California.
Mean + SEM moths/trap/night
Conspecific sex pheromone’
Pear ester
Blank
Gop Anarsia Cues Platynota All other Cydia Solvent
lineatella stultana mothspecies pomonella Control
Peach 14.014+2.55 14.89+1.70 1.25+0.33 0 0.07 + 0.04 0
Apricot 10.68 +1.83 0.32+0.12 2.46+0.77 0 0 0
Plum 5.93 + 2.44 0.32+0.12 5.50+1.02 0 0 0
Almond 7.86+2.38 3.35+0.53 0.79+40.33 0 0.18+0.14 0
Pistachio 3.04+ 1.65 0.39+0.15 0.57+0.29 0 0 0
Grape - - 3.64 + 0.95 0 0 0
Kiwi - - 11.38 + 1.83 0 0 0
Citrus - - - 0 0.04 + 0.04 0
'Mean moth catch in sex pheromone-baited traps were all significantly different than moth
catch in pear ester-baited traps, P < 0.01 (ANOVA).
(Pasqualini et a/. 2004). Conversely, our
studies reported here have demonstrated
that pear ester is not attractive for eight
lepidopteran pest species of a number of
important horticultural crops in California
and Washington. The majority of these
lepidopteran pests either attack crops that
do not produce pear ester or feed and ovi-
posit primarily on foliage of pear or apple
that also lack pear ester. Species that are
known to be attractive to pear ester either
feed on ripe pear such as yellowjackets
(Akre and Davis 1979) and stink bugs
(Beers et al. 1993); share the major sex
pheromone component, (E£,£)-8,10-
dodecadien-1l-ol with codling moth, such
as C. fagiglandana and H. nubiferana, or
can detect this compound, such as C.
splendana (Schmidt et al. 2004), or have a
closely related sex pheromone, such as
methyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadieonoate for
Euschistus spp. stink bugs (Aldrich et al.
1991).
Among the various lepidopteran pests
in our study only C. molesta 1s a true inter-
nal fruit feeder that also attacks pear. Both
codling moth and C. molesta can also at-
tack quince (Cravedi and Ughini 1992),
another fruit that can release pear ester
(Schimizu and Yoshihara 1977). Pear host
races of C. molesta have been reported in
Australia (IV?ichev et al. 2003) and Italy
(Civolani et al. 1998); however, the attrac-
tiveness of pear ester for C. molesta in
these regions has not been examined. Ef-
forts to improve monitoring of C. molesta
populations, particularly in orchards
treated with sex pheromone mating disrup-
tion, have focused on the identification of
host plant volatiles attractive for females
(Natale et al. 2003). While adult popula-
tions of C. molesta trapped in peach, apri-
cot, plum, almond, and pistachios in our
study were not attractive to pear ester, sub-
sequent studies will evaluate the seasonal
attractiveness of pear ester for C. molesta
populations feeding on apple or pear.
66 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Brad
Christianson, and Duane Larsen (U.S.D.A.,
A.R.S., Wapato, WA) for their help in
checking traps. Reviews by Wee Yee and
Peter Landolt (U.S.D.A., A.R.S., Wapato,
WA), Rick Hilton (Southern Oregon Ex-
sity, Central Point, OR), and from several
anonymous reviewers strengthened the
paper. This project received partial support
from the Walnut Marketing Board, Sacra-
mento, CA and Washington Tree Fruit
Research Commission, Wenatchee, WA.
perimental Station, Oregon State Univer-
REFERENCES
Akre, R.D. and H.G. Davis. 1978. Biology and pest status of venomous wasps. Annual Review of Ento-
mology 23: 215-238.
Aldrich, J.R., M.P. Hoffmann, J.P. Kochansky, W.R. Lusby, J.E. Eger, and J.A. Payne. 1991. Identifica-
tion and attractiveness of a major pheromone component for nearctic Euschistus spp. stink bugs
(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Environmental Entomology 20: 477-483.
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7. Tallahassee, FL.
Barnes, M.M. 1991. Codling moth occurrence, host race formation, and damage. pp. 313-328. In L. P. S.
Van der Geest and H. H. Evenhuis (eds.). Tortricid pests: their biology, natural enemies and control.
Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barnes, M.M., W.B. Barnett, D.J. Culver, C.S. Davis, W.H. Olson, H. Riedl, W.R. Schreader, and R. Van
Steenwyk. 1993. Insects and mites, pp. 32-61. Jn M. L. Flint (ed.), Integrated pest management for
walnuts. University of California Publication 3270. University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
Barnett, W.W., W.J. Bentley, R.S. Bethell, C. Pickel, P.W. Weddle, and F.G. Zalom. 1991. Managing
pests in apples and pears, pp. 21-53. Jn M. L. Flint (ed.), Integrated pest management for apples and
pears. University of California Publication 3340. University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
Beers, E.H., J.F. Brunner, M.J. Willett, and G.M. Warner. 1993. Orchard pest management: a resource
book for the Pacific Northwest. Good Fruit Grower, Yakima, WA.
Berger, R.G., F. Drawert, and B. Schraufstetter. 1984. Natural occurrence of octenoic-, decenoic-, and
decadienoic acid ethyl esters in red delicious apples. Zeitschrift fiir Lebensmittel-untersuchung und -
Forschung 178: 104-105.
Buttery, R.G., D.M. Light, Y. Nam, G.B. Merrill, and J.N. Roitman. 2000. Volatile components of green
walnut husks. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 48: 2858-2861.
Civolani, S., S. Vergnani, D. Natale, and E. Pasqualini. 1998. Control strategies against Cydia molesta on
pome fruits. Inforatore Agrario 54: 71-75.
Coracini, M., M. Bengtsson, I. Liblikas, and P. Witzgall. 2004. Attraction of codling moth males to apple
volatiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110: 1-10.
Cravedi, P. and V. Ughini. 1992. Monitoring of some injurious Lepidoptera in quince orchards. Acta Phy-
topathologia et Entomologia Hungarica 27: 1-4.
Day, S.E. and R.L. Jeanne. 2001. Food volatiles as attractants for yellowjackets (Hymenoptera: Vespidae).
Environmental Entomology 30: 157-165.
IVichev, A. L., D.G. Williams, and A. Drago. 2003. Distribution of the oriental fruit moth Grapholitha
molesta Busck (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) infestation on newly planted peaches before and during 2
years of mating disruption. Journal of Applied Entomology 127: 348-353.
Jennings, W.G., R.K. Creveling, and D.E. Heinz. 1964. Volatile esters of Bartlett pear. IV. Esters of
trans:2-cis:4-decadienoic acid. Journal of Food Science 29: 730-734.
Knight, A.L. and D.M. Light. 2001. Attractants from ‘Bartlett’ pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella
(L.), larvae. Naturwissenschaften 88: 339-342.
Knight, A.L., R.P.J. Potting, and D.M. Light. 2002. Modeling the impact of a sex pheromone/kairomone
attracticide for management of codling moth (Cydia pomonella). Acta Horticulturae 584: 215-220.
Knight, A.L., P. VanBuskirk, R.J. Hilton, B.G. Zoller, and D.M. Light. 2005. Monitoring codling moth in
four pear cultivars with the pear ester. Acta Horticulturae (in press).
Landolt, P.J. 1998. Lacanobia subjuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on tree fruits in the Pacific Northwest.
Pan Pacific Entomology 74: 32-38.
Light, D.M., A.L. Knight, C.A. Henrick, D. Rajapaska, B. Lingren, J.C. Dickens, K.M.
Reynolds, R.G. Buttery, G. Merrill, J. Roitman, and B.C. Campbell. 2001. A pear-derived kairomone with
pheromonal potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). Naturwissen-
schaften 88: 333-338.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 67
Miller, R.L. D.D. Bills, and R.G. Buttery. 1989. Volatile components from Bartlett and Bradford pear
leaves. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 37: 1476-1479.
Mote, D.C. 1926. Codling moth attacks cherries. Journal of Economic Entomology 19: 777-778.
Natale, D., L. Mattiacci, A. Hern, E. Pasqualini, and S. Dorn. 2003. Response of female Cydia molesta
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to plant derived volatiles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93: 335-342.
Pasqualini, E., I. Espinha, P. Medrzycki, and S. Civolani. 2004. Effect of kairomone ethyl (2F, 4Z)-2,4-
decadienoate on Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) egg-laying behaviour. IOBC WPRS
Bulletin 27: in press.
Rothschild, G.H.L. and R.A. Vickers. 1991. Biology, ecology and control of oriental fruit moth, pp. 389-
412. In L. P. S. Van der Geest and H. H. Evenhuis (eds). Tortricid pests: their biology, natural ene-
mies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Schimizu, S. and S. Yoshihara. 1977. The constituents of the essential oil from Japanese quince fruit,
Cydonia oblonga Miller. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 41: 1525-1527.
Schmidt, S., G. Anfora, A. DeCristofaro, and C. loriatti. 2004. Tortricid species caught by the codling
moth kairomone ethyl (2F, 4Z)-2,4-decadienoate: monitoring trials and electrophysiological re-
sponses. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 27: in press.
Shiota, H. 1990. Changes in the volatile composition of La France pear during maturation. Journal of
Science Food Agriculture 52: 421-429.
Thwaite, W.G., A.M. Mooney, M.A. Eslick, and H.I. Nichol. 2004. Evaluating pear-derived kairomone
lures for monitoring Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Granny Smith apples under
mating disruption. General Applied Entomology 33: 56-60.
Usmani, K.A. and P.W. Shearer. 2001. Susceptibility of male oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) populations from New Jersey apple orchards to azinphosmethyl. Journal of Economic Entomol-
ogy 94: 233-239.
VanBuskirk, P.D., Hilton, R.J., Simone, N. and Alway, T. 1999. Orchard pest monitoring guide for pears:
a resource book for the Pacific Northwest. Good Fruit Grower Book Division, Yakima, WA.
68
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
69
Managing Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with an
Internal Grid of Either Aerosol Puffers or Dispenser
Clusters Plus Border Applications of Individual Dispensers
A.L. KNIGHT!
ABSTRACT
Field trials run from 2001 to 2003 evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of hand-
applied sex pheromone dispensers (Isomate-C) applied on the perimeter of apple or-
chards with an internal grid of either pressurized aerosol emitters (puffers) or clusters of
dispensers for control of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.). Puffers were placed in a
grid at 1 per ha, while the dispenser clusters were applied at 4 - 8 per ha. Puffers were
programmed to release either 240 or 360 mg (£, E)-8-10-dodecadienol (codlemone) per
day in 48 puffs (every 15 min from 1500 — 0300 h). Dispensers were grouped in clusters
of 50 (Isomate-C TT) or 100 (Isomate-C PLUS) releasing 56 and 33 mg codlemone per
d, respectively. No significant differences were found in levels of fruit injury in puffer-
treated orchards paired with similar orchards treated with 500 Isomate-C PLUS indi-
vidually applied dispensers per ha. Similarly no significant differences in fruit injury
were found in orchards treated with individually applied dispensers versus orchards
treated with Isomate-C PLUS dispensers (100 per cluster) placed in screened cages or
Isomate-C TT dispensers (50 per cluster) hung from plastic disks. Levels of fruit injury,
however, were significantly higher in orchards treated with Isomate-C PLUS dispensers
(100 per cluster) hung from plastic disks versus in orchards treated with individually
applied dispensers. This later poor performance of the Isomate-C PLUS clusters was
associated with its more restricted spacing of dispensers within the cluster and a signifi-
cant reduction in the weight loss of dispensers compared with dispensers applied indi-
vidually. These studies suggest that the use of puffers can effectively lower the cost of
codling moth management through reductions in sex pheromone puff volume and emit-
ter density.
Key Words: mating disruption, sex pheremones, puffers, apple
INTRODUCTION
Since 1990, uniformly distributed hand- Knight 1995a), material cost (Alway
applied dispensers loaded with (E, E)-8-
10-dodecadienol (codlemone) have been
the most commonly used approach to dis-
rupt mating of codling moth, Cydia pomo-
nella (L.) in North American tree fruit and
nut crops (Thomson ef al. 2000). Major
problems associated with the use of hand-
applied dispensers have been maintaining
the chemical stability of codlemone
(Brown et al. 1992; Millar 1995), seasonal
variability in emission rates primarily due
to changes in temperature (Howell 1992;
1997), and the labor cost of applying hun-
dreds of dispensers per hectare (Knight
1995b; Williamson ef al. 1996). High
emission, timer-activated mechanical aero-
sol dispensers (puffers) have been sug-
gested as an alternative that can solve
some of these problems (Mafra-Neto and
Baker 1996; Shorey et al. 1996; Isaacs et
al. 1999). Puffers are used at a low density,
can protect sex pheromones from UV deg-
radation and oxidation, allow the applica-
tion of a consistent pheromone release rate
Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 5230 Konnowac Pass
Rd., Wapato, WA 98951
70 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
throughout the season, and allow users to
adjust the cycle and periodicity of sex
pheromone release (Shorey ef a/. 1996).
Shorey and coworkers postulated that
effective mating disruption depended on
the concentration of sex pheromone re-
leased per area and was not significantly
affected by the spacing between individual
point sources (Farkas eft al. 1974; Shorey er
al. 1996; Shorey and Gerber 1996a, b, c).
They showed that the distance between
pheromone sources could be quite large.
For example, a perimeter application of
emitters 100 m apart effectively disrupted
Platynota stultana (Walsingham) and Spo-
doptera exigua (Hibner) mating (Shorey ef
al. 1996).
Puffers were initially evaluated for cod-
ling moth in walnuts where tree height and
large canopy size had precluded the adop-
tion of hand-applied dispensers (Shorey
and Gerber 1996b). A single orchard was
treated with 2.3 puffers per ha with units
spaced 40 m apart along its perimeter.
Puffers were programmed to release ap-
proximately 5.0 mg codlemone per puff
every 30 min (254 mg/ha per d). Moth
catches in traps baited with synthetic lures
and virgin females were reduced 95 and
98% in this orchard versus in traps placed
in an untreated orchard (Shorey and Gerber
1996b). The current standard protocol for
codling moth control with puffers recom-
mends the use of 2.5 — 5.0 puffers per ha
arranged primarily around the perimeter of
orchards. However, in large blocks (> 16
ha) a few puffers are placed along the up-
wind interior of the orchards (Elkins
2002).
Four major problems have occurred
with the use of puffers for management of
codling moth. First, placement of puffers
on the perimeter of orchards has not been
effective in preventing injury along the
upwind edges of the orchards (Shorey ef
al. 1998). Greater wind speed and turbu-
lence plus higher moth population density
along orchard borders are problematic with
this approach (Milli et al. 1997). A second
problem has been their high cost. The fixed
cost of individual cabinets housing the
electronics ($40 amortized over 5 y) plus
the yearly cost of the disposable phero-
mone-loaded canisters ($80) often limits
the number of units deployed. Hand-
applied dispensers in Washington State are
typically applied at rates of 500 per ha and
cost $125 per ha (Alway 1997). To be cost
competitive puffer density should be 1.5 —
2.0 units per ha. A third problem has been
the loss of units during the season due to
wind, vandalism, and a variety of mechani-
cal malfunctions. The unreliable perform-
ance of puffers has required expensive
maintenance and frequent monitoring of
units (Knight 2002). A fourth problem has
been the occurrence of severe marking of
fruit and foliar phytotoxicity surrounding
units due to incidental contact with the sex
pheromone solution (Giroux and Miller
2001).
An alternative approach was developed
that alleviates some of these constraints
(Knight 2002). Orchards are treated with
an internal grid of puffers spaced 50 m
from the border and 100 m apart (one
puffer per ha) in combination with a pe-
rimeter application of hand-applied dis-
pensers (1,000 per ha). This design was
tested in apple orchards for codling moth
alone or codling moth and obliquebanded
leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana
(Harris), using canisters loaded with the
sex pheromone of both species (Knight
2002). This method provided good control
of both pests at a lower cost per ha than the
use of uniformly distributed hand applied
dispensers. However, these studies were
only conducted in large, regular-shaped
orchards with flat terrain and have not suf-
ficiently addressed the utility of this ap-
proach in smaller, irregular-shaped or-
chards with sloping topography (Knight
2002). The initial success of this approach
also suggests that lower puffer volumes of
sex pheromone should be evaluated. Un-
fortunately, problems with the reliability of
the puffer units and phytotoxic effects per-
sisted in this study and grower adoption
has been slowed by these problems. An
alternative design has been proposed that
would replace the mechanical puffers with
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
clusters of hand-applied dispensers to gen-
erate high emission point sources (Knight
2002).
Herein, I report results from field
evaluations conducted in apple from 2001-
03 using grids of both puffers and clusters
of dispensers to manage codling moth.
Studies were conducted with puffers emit-
ting two rates of sex pheromone and with
71
four types of clusters that varied in dis-
penser density, dispenser type, and dis-
penser spacing within the cluster. Results
demonstrate that an internal grid of widely
spaced emitters can be effectively used as
part of an integrated management approach
for codling moth and can further reduce
the costs associated with using sex phero-
mones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Studies were conducted in 20 — 60 ap-
ple orchards of several cultivars (primarily
‘Delicious’, ‘Fuji? and ‘Granny Smith’)
near Brewster, WA each year from 2001-
03. All orchards evaluated in 2001 were 16
ha with level terrain. Orchards in 2002-03
varied in size from 4.0 — 16.0 ha and very
often were irregular in shape with a moder-
ately sloping terrain (3.0 — 6.0° slope).
Field trials were conducted to evaluate
the effectiveness of a combination of hand-
applied sex pheromone _ dispensers
(Isomate-C PLUS, Pacific Buiocontrol,
Vancouver, WA) applied on the perimeter
of apple orchards with an internal grid of
either pressurized aerosol emitters
(puffers) or clusters of hand-applied dis-
pensers (Isomate C Plus and Isomate C TT,
Pacific Buiocontrol, Vancouver, WA).
Puffer cabinets (Paramount Puffer", Para-
mount Farming, Bakersville, CA) were
spaced in an internal 100 x 100 m grid (1
per ha) beginning 50 m from the edges of
the orchard. Orchards treated with clusters
of dispensers received four clusters of dis-
pensers per ha spaced in an internal 50 x
50 m grid, except for five orchards in 2003
that were treated with eight clusters of dis-
pensers per ha spaced 35 x 35 m apart.
Cluster grids were spaced beginning 25 m
from the edge of the orchard. The perime-
ter of these orchards was also treated with
a 10-20 m wide band of hand-applied
Isomate-C PLUS dispensers at a rate of
1,000 dispensers per ha.
Puffers were evaluated in 2001 and
2002 in 22 orchards. The cabinet of puffers
is constructed of high-density polyethylene
plastic (32 x 15 x 12 cm) and powered by
four ‘AA’ batteries. Puffer operation was
controlled by a remote controller and puff-
ers operated only at temperatures > 10 °C.
Cabinets were mounted on wood blocks
and attached with a metal clip to trees in
the upper third of the canopy. Puffer can-
isters are pressurized metal cylinders
loaded with either a 25.0% or a 16.7%
solution of codlemone plus solvents and
propellants. Canisters emit a 30 mg spray
through a solenoid-metered valve every 15
min from 1500 — 0300 h. Studies were
conducted in 2001 with puffers emitting
either a 7.5 or 5.0 mg A.I. dose
(codlemone). Studies in 2002 tested only
the 5.0 mg dose.
The effectiveness of using clusters of
Isomate-C dispensers was evaluated in 39
orchards from 2001-03. Two different
polyethylene Isomate-C dispensers were
used in clusters, Isomate-C PLUS and
Isomate-C TT. Both dispensers are loaded
with a 60:33:7 blend of (E, £)-8-10-
dodecadien-1l-ol, dodecanol, and tetradeca-
nol. Isomate-C PLUS and Isomate-C TT
dispensers were loaded with 182.3 and
382.4 mg active ingredients, respectively.
Only Isomate-C PLUS dispensers were
used in 2001 and they were clustered in
square, screened boxes (19.0 x 19.0 x 21.0
cm). One hundred dispensers were placed
vertically in the screened boxes in alternat-
ing cells and were spaced on average (SE)
2.4 (0.1) cm apart. The screened sides of
the box had a 0.41 cm’ mesh and the ends
of the box were constructed with a 0.10
cm’ screen to prevent dispensers from fal-
ling out. Plastic bucket lids (21.7 cm di-
ameter) were used to hold clusters of dis-
72 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
pensers during 2002-03. The plastic lids
had either 100 slits (0.15 x 0.7 cm) or 50
0.48 cm-diameter holes cut in the lids for
Isomate-C PLUS or Isomate-C TT dis-
pensers, respectively. One end of each dis-
penser was inserted vertically into the plas-
tic lid. The mean (SE) spacing of Isomate-
C PLUS and Isomate-C TT dispensers
hanging from the lid was 1.3 (0.2) cm and
3.0 (0.2) cm, respectively. Studies were
conducted with Isomate-C PLUS in 13
orchards in 2002 and with Isomate-C TT in
11 and 10 orchards in 2002 and 2003, re-
spectively. During 2003 five orchards each
were treated with four or eight clusters per
ha. The screened boxes and plastic lids
were attached to poles with wire hangers.
Clusters of dispensers were placed in the
upper third of the canopy.
Comparison orchards (controls) were
selected each year and paired with or-
chards treated with puffers or dispenser
clusters. Orchard pairs were selected based
on similarity in size, proximity, cultivar,
ownership, spray practices and pest pres-
sure (based on percent fruit injury the pre-
vious year). All comparison orchards were
treated with Isomate-C PLUS dispensers
applied at a rate of 500 dispensers per ha.
Pheromone lure-baited delta-shaped
traps were deployed in all orchards at a
density of 1 per 2 ha placed around the
perimeter of each orchard 10 m from the
edge. Orchards treated with dispenser
clusters in 2001 and 2003 plus the associ-
ated comparison orchards were also moni-
tored with two (2001) or three (2003) pear
ester-baited traps placed 50 m from the
edge of orchards and >100 m from the
nearest trap. Pear ester lures were used in
these two studies to provide a second
measure of moth population density that
would be more independent of the sex
pheromone treatment. Trécé Inc. (Adair,
OK) provided all monitoring traps and
lures. Traps were placed in the upper third
of the orchards’ canopy using a permanent
PVC pole. Sex pheromone-baited traps
were checked weekly and pear ester-baited
traps were checked every 4 wk. Lures were
replaced after 8 wk and removable sticky
trap liners were replaced as needed.
Pre-harvest fruit injury was assessed by
sampling 30 fruit from 20 trees selected
within each quadrant of each orchard
(2,400 fruit sampled per orchard). An
equal number of fruit were sampled from
the interior and from the edge (< 30 m
from the perimeter) of each quadrant.
Spray records were obtained from the
growers and field managers at the end of
each season.
The weight loss of each dispenser type
for dispensers applied individually or
within a cluster was analyzed in 2002. Six
new dispensers of each type were weighed
on 29 April. Isomate-C Plus dispensers
were then twisted on to a plastic clip and
attached to branches in a pear orchard.
Isomate-C TT dispensers were placed over
branches in the same orchard. Five new
dispensers were randomly selected from
the outer rim and five from the center of
four clusters and were weighed. Clusters
were hung individually in pear trees spaced
10 m apart. All dispensers were reweighed
on 25 September.
Statistical analysis. Mean moth catch
per trap, number of insecticide sprays ap-
plied for codling moth, and percent fruit
injury in orchards treated with uniformly
distributed individual dispensers versus
grids of puffers or dispenser clusters were
analyzed with the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
(Analytical Software 2000). The mean
daily weight loss for dispensers applied
individually or placed in the middle or
outer rim of clusters in 2002 was analyzed
for each dispenser type with a Kruskal-
Wallis test (Analytical Software 2000).
RESULTS
No significant differences were found
for mean moth catch, number of insecti-
cide sprays applied, and codling moth fruit
injury between puffer-treated and individu-
ally applied dispenser-treated orchards at
either puffer emission rate (Table 1). Ap-
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 73
Table 1.
Summary data for paired apple orchards treated with either an internal grid of one aerosol
puffer per ha plus a perimeter treatment of Isomate-C PLUS dispensers or 500 Isomate-C
PLUS dispensers per ha. Puffers released either 5.0 or 7.5 mg sex pheromone per puff. No
significant differences were found in moth catch, number of insecticide sprays applied, and
percent fruit injury between the paired puffer and Isomate-treated orchards, Wilcoxin Signed
Rank tests, two-tailed P-value > 0.05.
; Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE)
Puff: eee
Sve Year (no. moth catch per trap no. sprays % fruit injury
(mg) orenaras) Puffers | Dispensers Puffers Dispensers Puffers Dispensers
7.5 2001 (10) 1.5(0.8) 2.5(€1.1) 0.8(0.2) 0.9(0.2) 0.22 (0.15) 0.20 (0.12)
5.0 2001 (5) 4.3(1.8) 5.7(2.1) 1.3(0.4) 2.4(0.6) 0.20(0.13) 0.54 (0.20)
5.0 2002 (7) 6.9(1.9) 7.8(3.6) 1.5(0.4) 1.4(0.4) 0.12 (0.03) 0.08 (0.07)
5.0 All(12) 5.8(1.5) 6.9(3.0) 1.4(0.2) 1.8(0.3) 0.15 (0.06) 0.27 (0.11)
ple orchards had low codling moth popula-
tion densities as evidenced by low cumula-
tive moth catches in sex pheromone-baited
traps (< 10 moths per season) (Table 1).
Growers supplemented their use of puffers
and dispensers with 1 — 3 insecticide
sprays per season. Insecticides applied for
codling moth included azinphosmethyl,
phosmet, and methoxyfenozide. Nearly
half of all sprays were applied only to the
borders of orchards.
Orchards treated with clusters of dis-
pensers had similar moth catches and sup-
plemental insecticide sprays applied as
orchards treated with individual dispensers
during all three years (Table 2). Codling
moth fruit injury in orchards treated with
individually applied dispensers paired with
orchards treated with either screened box
clusters with Isomate-C Plus or plastic lid
clusters of Isomate-C TT dispensers were
not significantly different in any of the
three years (Table 2). However, fruit injury
was significantly higher during 2002 in
orchards treated with plastic lid clusters of
Isomate-C Plus dispensers than in the
paired orchards treated with individually
applied dispensers (Table 2). During 2003,
orchards treated with 4.0 and 8.0 clusters
per ha loaded with Isomate-C TT dispens-
ers had similar levels of codling moth in-
jury as orchards treated with 500 or 1,000
dispensers per ha, respectively (Table 2)
The mean weight loss of dispensers
within plastic lid clusters versus those indi-
vidually applied varied between dispenser
type (Table 3). No difference was found in
the mean weight loss of Isomate-C TT
dispensers placed in clusters versus dis-
pensers applied individually. The mean
daily emission rate of codlemone from
these clusters during the season averaged
55.6 mg. In comparison, Isomate-C Plus
dispensers in both the center and edge of
clusters loss significantly less weight dur-
ing the season than dispensers applied indi-
vidually (Table 3). The mean daily emis-
sion rate of codlemone from these clusters
averaged only 32.7 mg during the season.
DISCUSSION
These studies show that treating or-
chards with a high-density application of
dispensers on the perimeter and a widely
spaced grid of high emission emitters inter-
nally can be substituted for the application
of hundreds of individually applied dis-
pensers to manage codling moth in apple.
The use of either pressurized canisters re-
leasing puffs of sex pheromone every 15
min or the continuous passive diffusion of
74 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 2.
Summary data for paired apple orchards treated with either an internal grid of clusters of
Isomate-C dispensers at 4.0 or 8.0 clusters per ha plus a perimeter treatment of Isomate-C
PLUS dispensers or treated with 500 — 1,000 Isomate-C PLUS dispensers per ha. Clusters were
baited with either 100 Isomate-C PLUS or 50 Isomate-C TT dispensers.’
Mean (SE) moth catch per trap
Treatment per ha’ Mean (SE) Mean (SE)
(# paired orchards) Sex pheromone Kairomone 10. cover sprays % fruit injury
2001
4 C-Plus box clusters (5) 2.0 (0,9) 3.0 (1.0) 0.8 (0.2) 0.00 (0.00)
500 C-Plus dispensers 2.8 (0.8) 3.4 (0.7) 1.0 (0.0) 0.12 (0.06)
2002
4 C-TT lid clusters (11) 8.4 (2.7) - 1.5 (0.5) 0.15 (0.08)
500 C-Plus dispensers 10.1 (3.6) - 2.0 (0.5) 0.14 (0.06)
4 C-Plus lid clusters (13) 10.7 (2.9) - 1.6 (0.4) 0.14 (0.06)**
500 C-Plus dispensers 6.5 (2.1) - 1.8 (0.4) 0.05 (0.03)**
2003
8 C-TT lid clusters (5) 2.4 (1.5) 8.8 (6.1) 1.8 (0.4) 0.20 (0.20)
1,000 C-Plus dispensers 1.2 (0.6) 2.2 (0.6) 1.8 (0.4) 0.00 (0.00)
4 C-TT lid clusters (5) 2.6 (1.6) 4.8 (1.9) 1.4 (0.6) 0.13 (0.10)
500 C-Plus dispensers 7.4 (5.9) 3.8 (2.6) 1.8 (0.4) 0.00 (0.00)
'««*? Pyalue < 0.01, two-tailed Wilcoxin Signed Rank test. All other statistical comparisons
were not significant, P > 0.05.
One hundred Isomate C-PLUS dispensers were placed in screened boxes in 2001 and attached
to plastic lids in 2002. Fifty Isomate C-TT dispensers were attached to plastic lids in 2002-03.
Table 3.
Mean (SE) weight loss (mg per d) of dispensers aged in the field, 29 April - 25 September
2002'
Dispenser on the outer
Individual Dispenser in the
mispensct dispenser center of cluster rim of cluster Bryan
Isomate-C TT 1.74 (0.11) 1.84 (0.04) 1.87 (0.05) O52
Isomate-C PLUS 0.71 (0.08)a 0.56 (0.02)b 0.53 (0.02)b < 0.01
‘Row means followed by a different letter were significantly different, P < 0.05, Kruskal-
Wallis one-way nonparametric analysis of variance using a chi-squared approximation.
approach for codling moth where dispens-
ers are applied only to the perimeter of
orchards has not been tested.
Most of the orchards treated with sex
sex pheromone from clusters of dispensers
were both effective. Charmillot et al.
(1995) used a perimeter-only application
of sex pheromone dispensers to reduce
injury from Lobesia botrana Denis &
Schiffinmiiller in vineyards, and they were
the first to suggest a grid design. A similar
pheromones in these studies were also
sprayed with insecticides for control of
codling moth. Thus it is not possible to
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
assess the effectiveness of the sex phero-
mone treatments alone. In general, sex
pheromone is considered to be an impor-
tant part of an integrated management pro-
gram for codling moth, and can rarely be
used as a single control tactic (Brunner ef
al. 2002). The latest survey of insecticide
usage in Washington State reported that on
average three to four sprays are applied for
codling moth (National Agricultural Statis-
tical Service 2002). Many orchards in the
Brewster area have been treated with three
to six insecticide applications in the past
few years due to increased pest populations
(A.L.K., unpublished data). Based on
these data the use of sex pheromone in our
study reduced insecticide use 40-60%
compared with conventionally treated or-
chards.
Nearly half of all insecticides were ap-
plied only to the borders of orchards in our
study. Codling moth injury most com-
monly occurs on the borders of orchards
regardless of whether orchards are treated
with hand-applied dispensers (Pfeiffer ef
al. 1993), treated with puffers placed on
the perimeter (Elkins 2002), or treated only
with insecticides (Madsen eft al. 1975).
Effective disruption of codling moth along
border areas will remain problematic due
to this area’s reduced canopy structure and
greater wind speed and turbulence that can
reduce the sex pheromone concentration
(Milli et a/. 1997). Trimble and Vickers
(2000) found that codling moth could be
effectively managed over a three-year pe-
riod in Ontario apple orchards with only
border insecticide applications. The inte-
gration of border sprays with an internal
grid of puffers/clusters may be an effective
management alternative that has not yet
been evaluated.
The internal grid design has several
operational advantages over the standard
hand application of hundreds of dispensers
per hectare including cost savings and ease
of use. Grouping the same number of dis-
pensers into clusters reduced application
costs up to 35% among growers that I sur-
veyed. Yet, this savings for growers was
minimal because application costs for
hand-applied dispensers are low, $15 for
500 dispensers per ha (Knight 1995b). The
application and servicing of puffers was
not measured in this study but was re-
ported earlier to be only $3 per puffer
(Elkins 2002). The material cost of the
puffer grid design was slightly less expen-
sive than the use of reduced rates of hand-
applied dispensers ($111 versus $125 per
ha), except for the high fixed cost of the
remote control ($350).
Further reductions in the cost of an ef-
fective management program using clus-
ters of dispensers are unlikely. Clusters
loaded with 100 Isomate-C Plus dispensers
did not perform as well as the standard
program and were estimated to release 30
mg codlemone per d. Clusters with 50
Isomate-C TT dispensers released 40%
more codlemone per d than clusters of 100
Isomate-C PLUS and provided effective
control. Further evaluation of clusters
loaded with 30 — 50 Isomate-C TT dis-
pensers might establish a minimum thresh-
old needed with this design. However, the
complex interplay of factors impacting the
population dynamics of codling moth in
commercial pheromone-treated orchards
would likely obscure any marginal im-
provement in performance. Instead, addi-
tional cost savings can more likely be
achieved by reducing the amount of sex
pheromone loaded in puffers.
The amount of sex pheromone loaded
in Paramount Puffers® used in Washing-
ton State orchards could be reduced 50%
by lowering the pheromone puff from 7.5
to 5.0 mg and the longevity of the phero-
mone loading in the canister from 200 to
150 d. Unlike in California, the flight pe-
riod of codling moth lasts approximately
150 d from late April to mid September in
Washington State. Further refinements in
the arrangement of puffers especially when
supplemented with insecticides could fur-
ther reduce the cost. Studies have shown
that individual puffers can disrupt male
codling moth orientation to traps placed
200 — 450 m downwind (Shorey and Ger-
ber 1996b, Cave et al. 2001), and suggest
that their density could be reduced to one
76 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
per several hectares. Puffer densities could
likely be reduced in large, contiguous
plantings. For example, the density of puff-
ers declined from 4.0 to 2.8 per ha as the
size of an area wide pear project in Lake
County, California increased from 100 to
531 ha over a five-year period (Elkins
2002).
Puffers have been demonstrated to be
an effective tool to manage codling moth
under a variety of deployments (Elkins
2002, Knight 2002). The use of dispenser
clusters was developed as an alternative
due to the unreliability of puffers (Knight
2002). Yet, the characteristics of dispens-
ers currently limit the maximum emission
rate of codlemone from clusters. Thus,
increasing the emission rates from clusters
or the density of clusters will also increase
the cost of this approach. Puffers allow
greater flexibility in adjusting the emission
rate and timing of release. Improvements
in the operation and reliability of puffers
will enhance their adoption. The use of an
internal grid design may allow the devel-
opment of a lower cost, effective manage-
ment program for codling moth to be de-
veloped.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Brad Christianson, Duane
Larson, and Kathi Johnson (U.S.D.A.,
A.R.S., Wapato, WA) for their help in con-
ducting these tests. Mitch Trimble, Ag
Canada, Vineland, Ontario; Doug Light,
U.S.D.A., Albany, CA; and Tom Larsen,
Suterra LLC, Bend, OR, provided helpful
comments. This project was_ partially
funded by the Washington Tree Fruit Re-
search Commission, Wenatchee, WA.
REFERENCES
Alway, T. 1997. Mating disruption use in Washington State: grower survey report. Areawide IPM Update
2: 1-3.
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7. Tallahassee, FL.
Brown, D.E., A.L. Knight, J.F. Howell, C.R. Sell, J.L. Krysan, and M. Weiss. 1992. Emission characteris-
tics of a polyethylene pheromone dispenser for mating disruption of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tor-
tricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 910-917.
Brunner, J., S. Welter, C. Calkins, R. Hilton, E. Beers, J. Dunley, T. Unruh, A. Knight, R. VanSteenwyk,
and P. Van Buskirk. 2002. Mating disruption of codling moth: a perspective from the western United
States. International Organization of Biological Control West Palaeartic Regional Section Bulletin 29:
11-21.
Cave, F., M. Singleton, and S. Welter. 2001. Area of influence of aerosol emitters: immediate and residual
effects, pp. 145-146. /n Proceedings, 75"" Western Orchard Pest & Disease Management Conference,
10-12 January 2001, Portland, OR. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Charmillot, P.J., D. Pasquier, N.J. Alipaz, and U. Neumann. 1995. Effet d’une ceinture de diffuseurs a
attractif sexuel sur la distribution des captures de males, des accouplements de femelles attachées et de
l’attaque de Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. en Vignoble. Journal of Applied Entomology 119: 201-
206.
Elkins, R. 2002. Areawide implementation of mating disruption in pears using puffers. Pest Management
Grant Final Report No. 00-0198S. California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
Farkas, S.R., H.H. Shorey, and L.G. Gaston. 1974. Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. The use of widely
separated evaporators of Looplure for the disruption of pheromone communication in 7richoplusia ni.
Environmental Entomology 3; 876-877.
Giroux, P.Y. and J.R. Miller. 2001. Phytotoxicity of pheromonal chemicals to fruit tree foliage: chemical
and physiological characterization. Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 1170-1176.
Howell, J.F. 1992. Two years of commercial use of Isomate-C to disrupt mating for codling moth, pp.
176-181. In Proceedings 88™ Washington State Horticultural Association, 7-9 December, 1992,
Yakima, WA. Washington State Horticultural Association, Wenatchee, WA.
Isaacs, R., M. Ulezynski, B. Wright, L.J. Gut, and J.R. Miller. 1999. Performance of the microsprayer
with application for pheromone-mediated control of insect pests. Journal of Economic Entomology
92: 1157-1164.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 qe
Knight, A.L. 1995a. Evaluating pheromone emission rate and blend in disrupting sexual communication
of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology 24: 1396-1403.
Knight, A.L. 1995b. The impact of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) mating disruption on apple
pest management in Yakima Valley, Washington. Journal of the Entomological Society British Co-
lombia 92: 29-38.
Knight, A.L. 2002. Development of aerosol devices for management of codling moth and leafrollers.
International Organization of Biological Control West Palaeartic Regional Section Bulletin 25: 111-
120.
Madsen, H.F., F.E. Peters, and J.M. Vakenti. 1975. Pest management: experience in six British Columbia
apple orchards. The Canadian Entomologist 107: 873-877.
Mafra-Neto, A. and T.C. Baker. 1996. Timed, metered sprays of pheromone disrupt mating of Cadra
cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Agricultural Entomology 13: 149-168.
Millar, J.G. 1995. Degradation and stabilization of E8,E10-dodecadienol, the major component of the
sex pheromone of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88:
1425-1432.
Milli, R., U.T. Koch, and J.J. de Kramer. 1997. EAG measurement of pheromone distribution in apple
orchards treated for mating disruption of Cydia pomonella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
82: 289-297.
National Agricultural Statistical Service. 2002. Apple Chemical Use, Agricultural Chemical Use Survey,
Washington State. http:www.nass.usda.gov/wa/chemuse/appchem.pdf.
Pfeiffer, D.G., W. Kaakeh, J.C. Killian, M.W. Lachance, and P. Kirsch. 1993. Mating disruption for con-
trol of damage by codling moth in Virginia apple orchards. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
67: 57-64.
.H.Shorey, H.H. and R.G. Gerber. 1996a. Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication
among navel orangeworm moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in almonds, pistachios, and walnuts. Envi-
ronmental Entomology 25: 1154-1157.
Shorey, H.H. and R.G. Gerber. 1996b. Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication of
codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in walnut orchards. Environmental Entomology 25: 1398-
1400.
Shorey, H.H. and R.G. Gerber. 1996c. Disruption of pheromone communication through the use of puff-
ers for control of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in tomatoes. Environmental Entomology
25: 1401-1405.
Shorey, H.H., C.B. Sisk, and R.G. Gerber. 1996. Widely separated pheromone release sites for disruption
of sex pheromone communication in two species of Lepidoptera. Environmental Entomology 25: 446-
451.
Shorey, H., R. Gerber, and R. Elkins. 1998. Disruption of pheromone communication for control of cod-
ling moth in pears, pp. 23-36. Jn 1998 California Pear Research Reports. California Pear Advisory
Board, Sacramento, CA.
Thomson, D., J. Brunner, L. Gut, G. Judd, and A. Knight. 2000. Ten years implementing codling moth
mating disruption in the orchards of Washington and British Columbia. Starting right and managing
for success. International Organization of Biological Control West Palaeartic Regional Section Bulle-
tin 24 (2): 23-30.
Trimble, R.M. and P.M. Vickers. 2000. Evaluation of border sprays for managing the codling moth
(Tortricidae: Lepidoptera) and the apple maggot (Tephritidae: Diptera) in Ontario apple orchards.
Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 777-787.
Williamson, E.R., R.J. Folwell, A. Knight, and J.F. Howell. 1996. Economics of employing pheromones
for mating disruption of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. Crop Protection 15: 473-477.
78
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 79
Improved Deposition and Performance
of a Microencapsulated Sex Pheromone
Formulation for Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
with a Low Volume Application
A.L. KNIGHT! and T.E. LARSEN?
ABSTRACT
Experiments were conducted to evaluate the deposition pattern and effectiveness in dis-
rupting male orientation to virgin female-baited traps of a microencapsulated sex phero-
mone formulation for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) in apple, Malus domestica
Bordhausen. The efficacy of two application techniques was evaluated in field trials
with the microencapsulated formulation Checkmate® CM-F: a high volume (926 liters
per ha) application with an air blast sprayer and a low volume (46 liters per ha) applica-
tion with a custom-built vertical boom sprayer. These treatments were compared to an
unsprayed control and a control treatment where the formulation was applied directly on
the ground within the plots. Disruption of virgin female-baited traps was significantly
greater in the low volume versus the air blast application and versus the two types of
control plots. Levels of disruption in the air blast-sprayed plots were not different from
untreated plots or in plots where the sprayable sex pheromone was applied directly on
the ground. A significant increase in the proportion of traps catching moths occurred in
week 4. A significant interaction occurred among the effects of spray method, tree can-
opy position, and leaf surface on microcapsule deposition. This interaction was likely
due to the low rate of deposition of microcapsules on the undersides of leaves in the
lower canopy with the low volume sprayer. The low volume sprayer deposited signifi-
cantly more microcapsules in the upper canopy than the air blast sprayer. Significantly
more microcapsules were deposited on the underside versus the top of leaves in the up-
per canopy with the air blast but not with the low volume sprayer.
Key Words: sex pheromone, mating disruption, apple, pest management
INTRODUCTION
Various techniques have been devel-
oped to achieve mating disruption of cod-
ling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), by treat-
ing orchards with controlled release de-
vices (Vickers and Rothschild 1991). The
use of sex pheromones in the western U.S.
has been adopted rapidly since 1991 and is
used on nearly 40,000 ha in Washington
State alone (Brunner ef al. 2002). Various
hand-applied dispensers registered for cod-
ling moth have accounted for > 90% of this
treated acreage (Thomson ef al. 2000).
Concurrently, microencapsulated sprayable
formulations have been tested for codling
moth (Knight 2000), but have not yet been
widely adopted.
The ease of applying microcapsules
with conventional equipment is a major
factor generating grower’s interest in
sprayables (Campion 1976, Doane 1999).
Sprayable sex pheromone formulations
allow pest managers to treat crops with tall
canopies, such as walnuts, and they in-
crease grower’s flexibility in adjusting
application rates and timings during the
season. In addition, microcapsules can be
tank-mixed with other pesticides and can
easily be included within a grower’s inte-
"Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 5230 Konnowac Pass
Rd., Wapato, WA 98951
* Suterra LLC, 213 SW Columbia Street, Bend, OR
80 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
grated control program.
Conversely, a major limitation affecting
the adoption of sprayable pheromone for-
mulations has been their relatively short
residual activity (Farbert et a/. 1997). The
emission profile from microcapsules typ1-
cally exhibits a large initial burst followed
by a sharp decline (Hall and Marrs 1989).
Microcapsules for codling moth have been
applied every four weeks during the grow-
ing season, but significant disruption of
moth catches may occur for only one to
two weeks (Knight 2000). Any efforts to
extend the current activity of microcap-
sules will speed the adoption of this tech-
nology for codling moth management.
A large number of factors are likely
involved in the successful use of microcap-
sules, including their emission profile over
time, their structural integrity, the chemical
stability of the sex pheromone, and density
initially deposited and retained over time
in the active area of the crop.
Surprisingly little is known about how
these factors affect the performance of
sprayable formulations for codling moth.
The addition of antioxidant and UV stabi-
lizers has reportedly improved the chem1-
cal stability of codlemone within a spray-
able formulation (Eng et a/. 2003). Labora-
tory studies have shown that differences in
the epicuticular wax layer and the degree
of pubescence of various plant tissues can
affect microcapsule deposition rates in
apple (Waldstein and Gut 2003, Knight ef
al. 2004). In addition, water has been
shown to be a major factor causing dis-
lodgement of microcapsules from leaves
(Knight et a/. 2004). Other factors, such as
wind, abrasion, or other environmental
factors impacting microcapsule retention
under field conditions have not been inves-
tigated.
Adjusting one or more application pa-
rameters to increase either the deposition
and/or retention of microcapsules over
time may be a useful approach to extend
the efficacy of sprayables for codling
moth. Increasing the rate of application
would likely also increase the density of
microcapsules deposited in the canopy, but
this approach 1s restricted by the compara-
ble costs of alternative pest management
tactics. Applying the same total rate of sex
pheromone per season using more frequent
applications of low rates of sprayables has
been an effective compromise for some
pest / crop systems (Polavarapu ef al.
2001), but have not been successful in lim-
ited tests with codling moth (Hull ef al.
2004). An additional parameter that may
improve the performance of sprayables
over time could be the refinement of the
application technique.
Many pesticides including sprayables
are applied in tree crops as concentrated
sprays in spray volumes of 500-1,000 li-
ters/ha using high velocity, air blast spray-
ers (Barnett et a/. 1991). The use of these
concentrated sprays can reduce application
costs and avoid excessive leaf run-off as
well as spray drift out of the orchard. Vari-
ous factors on the sprayer are adjusted to
generate a uniform spray coverage within
the canopy, including tractor speed, spray
velocity, and nozzle number, orifice size,
and orientation (Byers et al. 1984). Pesti-
cides are typically not applied with spray
volumes <500 liters/ha in pome fruit or-
chards due to the difficulty in attaining
good spray coverage (Byers ef al. 1984).
Similarly, microcapsule formulations have
not been applied in tree fruits in spray vol-
umes <500 liters/ha because they are
thought to achieve mating disruption by
camouflaging the calling of virgin females
with a uniform ‘fog’ of sex pheromone
(Doane 1999). Herein, we examine the
influence of two spray application tech-
niques on the pattern of deposition of
microcapsules and their efficacy in disrupt-
ing the sexual communication of codling
moth in apple, Malus domestica Bord-
hausen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Studies were conducted to compare the
efficacy of applications of Checkmate®
CM-F (Suterra LLC, Bend, OR), a micro-
encapsulated sex pheromone, with either
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
an air blast or a low volume sprayer in a 35
yr-old “Red Delicious’ apple orchard situ-
ated near Naches Heights, WA from 10
July to 08 August 2000. Twelve 0.25 ha
plots separated by 75 m were established
within the orchard and randomly assigned
one of four treatments: air blast application
of sex pheromone; air blast application of
water as a control; low volume application
of sex pheromone; and a low volume ap-
plication of sex pheromone directly on the
ground as a second control. The latter
treatment was included to experimentally
assess the impact of microcapsules that are
not deposited on the foliage following a
canopy spray application. Plots consisted
of 48 trees (6.8 x 8.0 m tree spacing).
Mean + SE tree height was 4.3 + 0.1 m.
Sex pheromone-treated plots were sprayed
with a 50:50 mixture of microcapsules
containing 14.3% codlemone and micro-
capsules formulated with 0.50% of a fluo-
rescent material "Dye-Lite" (Tracer Prod-
ucts, Westbury, NY). Codlemone was ap-
plied in all plots at a rate of 49.0 g a.i. per
ha. A Victair Mistifier (H. F. Hauff Co.,
Yakima, WA) sprayer with a 100-liter tank
pulled by an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) was
used to apply the air blast application of
sex pheromone and of water alone. Seven
spray nozzles angled at 45 ° and positioned
on the sprayer at heights from 1.1 to 1.7 m
applied 10.4 liters per minute at 686 kilo-
pascals. Plots were sprayed at a rate of 926
L/ha. The low volume sprayer consisted of
a 95-liter polyolefin tank mounted on an
ATV. The sprayer was rigged with an
adjustable vertical spray boom outfitted
with two flat fan nozzles. Nozzles were
positioned on the boom at a height of 3.1
m and angled upward at a 45° angle. The
two nozzles together deliver a spray vol-
ume of 2.36 liters per minute at 18 kilopas-
cals. Plots were sprayed at a rate of 46 L/
ha. A horizontal boom attached to the ATV
at a height of 1.0 m was used to apply the
ground application of sex pheromone and
fluorescent materials (49.0 g a.i. per ha)
with the same nozzles at the same low vol-
ume rate used in the canopy.
The density of fluorescent microcap-
8]
sules on the ground was estimated by plac-
ing five plastic cards (18 x 35 cm) beneath
the tree canopy prior to the spray applica-
tion. Cards were collected < 2 h after
sprays were applied, returned to the labora-
tory, and the number of microcapsules was
counted under UV illumination (Black-Ray
Long Wave Ultraviolet Lamp, Ultra-Violet
Products, Inc., San Gabriel, CA). Cards
placed in plots where the material was
sprayed directly on the ground were sub-
sampled. Cards were first subdivided into
ten 7 x 9 cm squares and the number of
microcapsules was counted in one ran-
domly selected square from each card.
The density of fluorescent microcap-
sules per leaf in the canopy was sampled in
both the air blast and low volume-treated
plots by collecting five leaves from 10
trees in each replicate from both low (2.2
m) and high (3.2 m) positions in the cano-
pies. Leaves were bagged and microcap-
sules on both the top and bottom leaf sur-
faces were counted under UV light in the
laboratory.
The efficacy of treatments in disrupting
codling moth was evaluated with the use of
virgin female-baited traps. Ten wing-
shaped sticky traps (Pherocon 1CP, Trécé
Inc., Salinas, CA) were placed in each plot
spaced approximately 10 m apart and 10 m
from the edge. Traps were baited with two
virgin female codling moths (< 3 d-old and
maintained at 5.0 + 0.5 °C) placed inside a
screened PVC cage (4.2 cm [O.D.] x 5.5
cm) hung inside from the top of each trap.
Traps were checked and females were re-
placed every three to four days. T he
proportion of traps not catching any male
moths was used as a measure of mating
disruption within each treatment.
Data Analysis. A repeated-measures
analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to
compare the proportion of virgin female-
baited traps catching male moths with
treatment as the between subject factor and
week as the within subject factor
(Analytical Software 2000). These propor-
tional data were transformed prior to
analysis with arcsine (square root [x]). A
three-way ANOVA was used to evaluate
82 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
the density of microcapsules on leaves
with spray application, leaf surface (top or
bottom surfaces), and canopy height (low
and high) as the main effects. Significant
means in all ANOVA’s were separated
with a least significant difference test, P <
0.05. The distribution of microcapsule
density between each spray method was
compared with a Kolmogorov-Smimov
test (Analytical Software 2000).
RESULTS
Significant differences in disruption of
male capture in female-baited traps were
found among plots sprayed either with an
air blast or a low volume sprayer, plots
where the sex pheromone was sprayed on
the ground, and unsprayed plots (F = 6.72;
df = 3, 8; P < 0.05) (Table 1). Significant
differences were also found in levels of
disruption among weeks (F' = 30.84; df =
3, 9; P < 0.001) (Table 1). The interaction
of treatment and time was not significant
(P = 0.42). Disruption of sexual communi-
cation was significantly higher in the low
volume-treated plots than the other treat-
ments. No difference in the male capture
in female-baited traps occurred in plots
treated with either the air blast sprayer,
applying the sex pheromone directly on the
ground, or the application of only water.
The proportion of traps catching moths
among treatments was significantly lower
during the first three weeks of the study
versus week four (Table 1).
The density of microcapsules deposited
on the ground beneath the trees varied
among the three sex pheromone treatments
(F = 78.20; df = 2, 6; P< 0.001). The high-
est mean + SE density of microcapsules
was in plots where the sex pheromone was
sprayed directly on the ground, 4.5 + 0.8
per 10 cm’ and was significantly different
from the microcapsule densities on the
ground in the canopy-treated plots sprayed
with either an air blast, 0.05 + 0.02 per 10
cm’ or a low volume sprayer, 0.14 + 0.05
per 10 cm’. The density of microcapsules
on the ground was not significantly differ-
ent between the two canopy spray treat-
ments.
The mean density of microcapsules
deposited in the lower and upper tree can-
opy and on the top and bottom surfaces of
leaves varied with both spray methods
(Fig. 1). The significant three-way interac-
tion for canopy position * leaf position *
spray method (F = 7.61; df = 1, 16; P <
0.05) appears to be the result of low micro-
capsule deposition on the lower leaf sur-
Table 1.
Mean + SE proportion of virgin female-baited traps catching male codling moths in plots
treated with microencapsulated sex pheromone (49 g a.i. per ha) applied with either an air blast
or low volume sprayer in the canopy or a low volume sprayer on the ground versus water con-
trol in replicated 0.25 ha apple plots, July — August 2000."
Proportion of traps catching moths
Overall week
Low volume Low volume
No. weeks
post-spray Water control ot
cano
I 0.30(0.06) 0.13 (0.07)
y 0.43 (0.07) 0.43 (0.17)
3 0.13(0.13) 0.23 (0.07)
4 0.90(0.10) 0.83 (0.03)
Oneal 0.44 (0.07)a_ 0.41 (0.09)a
treatment means
means
cano round
0.03 (0.03) 0.30 (0.15) 0.19 (0.05)c
0.23 (0.03) 0.53 (0.09) 0.41 (0.06)b
0.03 (0.03) 0.23 (0.03) 0.15 (0.04)c
0.63 (0.03) 0.70 (0.12) 0.77 (0.05)a
0.23 (0.08)b 0.44 (0.09)a
‘Column and row overall means followed by a different letter were significantly different,
repeated measures analysis of variance, P < 0.05, LSD.
1
6
A. Upper canopy
a) a: | ~e
(2) Ge 7.
5 845 Pa
25 oe
=e
+| se ig ®
cB 3 a
ce a2 ;
os é
ies O
1- a
Oise eee
Air blast Tow volume
Mean + number of
. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
83
4 jase
B. Lower canopy
334
2
_
5 O..
62 =e
3 ..
n Jue
as _ ..
oO Se
14 e.0O i
n 4
Tow volume
Air blast
Figure 1. The mean + SE number of microcapsules deposited on the top (e—e) or bottom (0-
-©) surface of leaves in the upper (A) and lower canopy (B) of apple trees sprayed with either
an air blast or low volume sprayer.
face in the bottom of the canopy when
applied with the low volume sprayer (open
symbols Fig. 1B). We conducted one-way
ANOVA on simple effects means to com-
pare spray methods and to compare leaf
surfaces in only the top of the canopy. A
significantly greater number of microcap-
sules were deposited per leaf with the low
volume (mean + SE = 7.5 + 1.4) versus the
air blast (mean + SE = 3.0 + 0.7) applica-
tion in the upper canopy (F = 16.40; df= 1,
4; P < 0.05). The difference in microcap-
sule density was significant between upper
and lower leaf surfaces for the air blast
sprayer (F' = 214.02; df = 1, 4; P < 0.0001)
with more microcapsules on the lower leaf
surface, but not with the low volume
sprayer (/'=3.69; df= 1,4; P=0.13).
The overall distribution of microcap-
sule densities per leaf in the canopy did not
differ significantly between spray methods
(K-S statistic = 0.10, P = 0.09) (Fig. 2).
The highest microcapsule density per leaf
in the plots treated with the low volume
and air blast sprayer ranged up to 116 and
17 microcapsules per leaf, respectively.
Five percent of the leaves sampled in the
low volume-treated plots had > 20 micro-
capsules and these were all in the upper
canopy.
DISCUSSION
Spray application method was found to
have a significant effect on the efficacy of
Checkmate® CM-F for codling moth. An
air blast application did not increase the
disruption of virgin female-baited traps
more than an untreated check or when the
material was sprayed directly on the
ground. This result is consistent with the
poor performance of this formulation in a
series of grower field trials using air blast
sprayers conducted from 2001-2003 (A. L.
K., unpublished data). In contrast, a low
volume application to the canopy provided
significant levels of disruption during a
four-week trial.
The difference in efficacy observed
between spray methods was associated
with differences in microcapsule deposi-
tion. The low volume application deposited
significantly more capsules than the air
blast spray in the upper canopy. The sexual
activity of codling moth is generally re-
stricted to the upper canopy and mating
disruption is enhanced when sex phero-
mone dispensers are placed in the upper
versus in the lower canopy (Weissling and
Knight 1995). The low volume application
also treated 5.0% of leaves with more than
20 microcapsules. The potential for these
leaves to serve as attractive point sources
and enhance “false-trail following” by
male codling moths has not been explored.
In general, the emission rate of sex phero-
mone from individual or clumps of micro-
capsules has been thought to be too low to
create an attractive point source (Sanders
84 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
@ Low volume © Air blast
Percentage of leaves
oS)
_)
0 1 to 5
6to10 11 to1l5 16 to 20
ey <—y 3
No. microcapsules per leaf
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of microcapsule density per leaf in plots sprayed with either
an air blast or low volume sprayer.
1997). Instead, microcapsule formulations
are thought to achieve mating disruption
by camouflaging the calling of virgin fe-
males with a uniform ‘fog’ of sex phero-
mone (Doane 1999). However, the mean
diameter of the Checkmate® CM-F 1s ap-
proximately 100 um, which 1s much larger
than many of the formulations (<< 5 um)
used in earlier studies (Bakan 1980). Addi-
tional research will determine if leaves
with variable numbers of microcapsules
are attractive to codling moth and whether
the low volume application of microcap-
sules may increase its effectiveness by
enhancing the role of “false-trail follow-
ing”.
Factors influencing the deposition of
microcapsules due to differences in spray
practices are not understood. The two can-
opy spray methods used in our trials dif-
fered in several ways including water vol-
ume (20-fold difference) and spray pres-
sure (40-fold difference). However, it is
not clear how these factors influence the
deposition of microcapsules on foliage.
Previous studies have found that the struc-
tural integrity of these microcapsules is not
impaired by high velocity spray applica-
tions (T. E. L., unpublished data). Interest-
ingly, no difference was found in the depo-
sition of microcapsules on the ground be-
neath trees with either canopy spray appli-
cation method. The addition of adjuvants
could perhaps improve the deposition of
microcapsules on leaves with either spray
method. Laboratory tests have found that a
latex sticker significantly increased deposi-
tion and retention of microcapsules on
dipped apple leaves before and after simu-
lated rainfall (Knight et al. 2004).
The height and angle of the spray noz-
zle may also affect the deposition pattern
within the canopy, i.e., the low deposition
of microcapsules on the underside of
leaves in the lower canopy in plots treated
with the low volume sprayer. Laboratory
studies have found that significantly more
microcapsules are deposited on the under-
side versus the top of apple leaves with
dipped leaves (Knight et a/. 2004). This
pattern was clearly seen in the upper can-
opy with the air blast but not with the low
volume spray application. Lowering the
vertical boom of the low volume sprayer
and aiming the spray stream upwards into
the canopy would likely increase the depo-
sition of microcapsules on the underside of
leaves. Microcapsules deposited on the
underside of leaves typically have greater
longevity due to shading effects (Hall and
Marrs 1989). This may be especially 1m-
portant with conjugated dienes such as
codlemone due to their sensitivity to isom-
erization and oxidation (Millar 1995). The
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
addition of UV stabilizers has significantly
extended the longevity of the Checkmate®
CM-F microcapsules; however, the effects
of shading provided by the undersurface of
apple, pear, or walnut leaves has not been
reported (Eng ef al. 2003).
The compatibility of microencapsulated
sex pheromone products with other pesti-
cides has been one factor used to promote
their use (Doane 1999). Air blast sprayers
apply materials at very high velocities (150
- 300 km/h) to generate a uniform cover-
age of small droplets throughout the can-
opy. Most pesticides during the season are
applied as concentrated sprays (< 1,000
liters per ha) due to significant reductions
in spray costs versus dilute applications
(Barmett et al. 1991). Yet, this study sug-
85
gests that applying a sprayable sex phero-
mone formulation for codling moth is not
effective with these standard spraying
methods. Difficulties in spraying orchards
late in the season with standard equipment
could be an important factor limiting the
adoption of sprayable pheromone in apple.
The low volume sprayer pulled by an ATV
allowed orchard rows with a closed canopy
to be sprayed without dislodging fruit. The
density and deposition patterns of micro-
capsules should be evaluated with the use
of alternative spray methods, such as air-
craft, handgun sprayers, or herbicide
sprayers. Further reductions in spray vol-
ume with these various methods should
also be considered.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Brad Christianson, (U.S.D.A.,
A.R.S., Wapato, WA) and Kristin Ketner
(Suterra LLC, Bend, OR) for their help in
conducting these tests. Dave Horton
(U.S.D.A., A.R.S., Wapato, WA) provided
advice for statistical analyses. Also special
thanks to Pete Garza (Manzana Orchards,
Moxee, WA) for allowing us to use his
orchards. Helpful comments were provided
by Arthur Agnello, Cornell University,
Geneva, NY; Steve Arthurs, U.S.D.A.,
Wapato, WA; and Doug Light, U.S.D.A.,
Albany CA. This project was partially
funded with funds supplied by the Wash-
ington Tree Fruit Research Commission,
Wenatchee, WA.
REFERENCES
Analytical Software. 2000. Statistix 7. Tallahassee, FL.
Bakan, J.A. 1980. Microencapsulation using coacervation/phase separation techniques, pp. 83-105. Jn A.
F.Kydonieus, ed., Controlled release technology: methods, theory, and applications. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL.
Barnett, W.W., W.J. Bentley, R.S. Bethell, C. Pickel, P.W. Weddle, and F.G. Zalom. 1991. Managing
pests in apples and pears, pp. 21-53. Jn M. L. Flint, ed., Integrated pest management for apples and
pears. Publication 3340. University of California Press. Oakland, CA.
Brunner, J., S. Welter, C. Calkins, R. Hilton, E. Beers, J. Dunley, T. Unruh, A. Knight, and R.Van Steen-
wyk. 2002. Mating disruption of codling moth: a perspective from the Western United States. Interna-
tional Organization of Biological Control Western Palaeartic Regional Section Bulletin 25(9): 11-21.
Byers, R.E., C.G. Lyons, K.S. Yoder, R.L. Horsburgh, J.A. Barden, and S.J. Donohue. 1984. Effects of
apple tree size and canopy density on spray chemical deposit. Horticultural Science 19: 93-94.
Campion, D.G. 1976. Sex pheromones for the control of lepidopteran pests using microencapsulated and
dispenser techniques. Pesticide Science 7: 636.
Doane, C.C. 1999. Controlled-release devices for pheromones, pp. 295-317. In H. B. Scher, ed., Con-
trolled-release delivery systems for pesticides. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Eng, J.A., E. Holmes, T. Larsen, S. Stadlmann, and K. Ketner. 2003. Effects of sunlight on encapsulated
sprayable codling moth pheromone, p. 9. Jn Proceedings 77” Western Orchard Pest and Disease Man-
agement Conference, 15-17 January 2003, Portland, OR. Washington State University, Wenatchee,
WA.
Farbert, P., U.T. Koch, A. Farbert, and R.T. Staten. 1997. Measuring pheromone concentrations in cotton
fields with the EAG method, pp. 347-358. Jn R. T. Carde and A. K. Minks, (eds.), Insect pheromone
research: new directions. Chapman & Hall, New York.
86 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Hall, D.R. and G.J. Marrs. 1989. Microcapsules. pp. 199- 248. Jn A. R. Jutsum and R. F. S. Gordon,
(eds.), Insect pheromones in plant protection. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York.
Hull, L.A., C. Myers, and G. Krawazyk. 2004. Low rate-frequent applications of sprayable pheromone for
oriental fruit moth and codling moth mating disruption in Pennsylvania, p. 5. Jn Proceedings 78”
Western Orchard Pest and Disease Management Conference, 14-16 January 2004, Portland, OR.
Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA.
Knight, A.L. 2000. Applying sex pheromones - from puffers to air-blast sprayers. Proceedings of the
Washington Horticultural Association 96: 161-163.
Knight, A.L., T.E. Larsen, and K.C. Ketner. 2004. Rainfastness of a microencapsulated sex pheromone
formulation for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97: 1987-
1992.
Millar, J.G. 1995. Degradation and stabilization of E8,E10-dodecadienol, the major component of the
sex pheromone of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88:
1425-1432.
Polavarapu, S., G. Lonergan, H. Peng, and K. Neilsen. 2001. Potential for mating disruption of Spargan-
othis sulfureana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in cranberries. Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 658-
665.
Sanders, C.J. 1997. Mechanisms of mating disruption in moths, pp. 333-346. Jn R. T. Carde and A. K.
Minks, (eds.), Insect pheromone research new directions. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Thomson, D., J. Brunner, L. Gut, G. Judd, and A. Knight. 2000. Ten years implementing codling moth
mating disruption in the orchards of Washington and British Columbia. Starting right and managing
for success. International Organization of Biological Control Western Palaeartic Regional Section
Bulletin 24 (2): 23-30.
Vickers, R.A. and G.H. Rothschild. 1991. Use of sex pheromones for control of codling moth, pp. 339-
354. In L. P. S. van der Geest and H. H. Evenhuis, (eds.), Tortricid pests: their biology, natural ene-
mies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Waldstein, D.E. and L.J. Gut. 2003. Comparison of microcapsule density with various apple tissues and
formulations of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) sprayable pheromone. Journal of Eco-
nomic Entomology 96: 58-63.
Weissling, T.J. and A.L. Knight. 1995. Vertical distribution of codling moth adults in pheromone-treated
and untreated plots. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77: 271-275.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
87
Persistence of a commercial codling moth
eranulovirus product on apple fruit and foliage
J.E. COSSENTINE”” and L.B.M. JENSEN!
ABSTRACT
Codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), larval bioassays were carried out on apples and
leaves collected from trees treated with the commercially available codling moth granu-
lovirus, Virosoft CP4*, to estimate the persistence of the product over time. The virus
had a significant effect on survival of laboratory derived codling moth larvae placed on
apples collected up to five and eight days post-treatment. Larvae died with virus symp-
toms after feeding on treated foliage and the leaf bioassay was easier to count than the
apple bioassay. A combination assay, exposing larvae to leaf discs and fruit may more
accurately account for potential exposure of wild neonate codling moth to virus in
treated orchards. The addition of fish, soybean or mineral oils to Virosoft CP4* treat-
ments did not significantly increase the efficacy or persistence of the viral insecticide on
apples in this study.
Key Words: Virosoft CP4®, leaf discs, Cydia pomonella
INTRODUCTION
The codling moth granulovirus (CpGV)
(Baculoviridae) is found in wild and colo-
nized codling moth (Cydia pomonella (L.),
Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) (Tanada 1964;
Eastwell et al. 1999) which 1s a major pest
of apples and pears throughout most of the
temperate world (Cross et al. 1999). CpGV
is noted for its high virulence when 1n-
gested by this host, particularly in the neo-
nate stage (Sheppard and Stairs 1976;
Tanada and Leutenegger 1968). Commer-
cial formulations of the virus have been
registered for use against the codling moth
in Europe since 1988 and in the U.S.A.
since 1995. In 2000, Virosoft CP4®, pro-
duced by BioTepp Inc., Quebec, became
registered for use on apples and pears in
Canada.
Commercial formulations of CpGV
require application of aqueous suspensions
of the virus onto the apples and foliage of
treated trees. There is a relatively short
time when a wild codling moth can be ef-
fectively exposed to CpGV treatment in an
orchard. Most wild codling moth eggs are
Oviposited on leaves (Jackson 1979). Neo-
nates move over leaf surfaces before find-
ing a fruit and chewing through the surface
where they remain, feed and develop
through to the last instar. Ballard ef al.
(2000) found that CpGV was ingested by
codling moth neonates browsing on CpGV
treated leaf surfaces, therefore there is the
potential for codling moth neonates to en-
counter and ingest lethal levels of CpGV
on both treated foliage and fruit surfaces.
Orchard trials of various commercial
preparations of CpGV_ have generally
shown good early suppression of neonate
codling moth (Glen and Payne 1984;
Jaques et al. 1987). However, like other
viral insecticides, the CpGV 1s susceptible
to inactivation and dilution due to tempera-
ture, exposure to sunlight, and precipita-
tion (Jaques 1975, 1985; Glen and Payne
1984). CpGV has been found to be 50%
inactivated in 2-8 d on apples (Glen and
Payne 1984; Jaques eft al. 1987; Arthurs
and Lacey 2004).
The goal of this study was to determine
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PARC, Summerland, BC, Canada VOH 1Z0
* Corresponding author:cossentinej@agr.gc.ca
88 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
®
the persistence of Virosoft CP4” on apples
and foliage under the orchard conditions in
the interior of British Columbia (BC), Can-
ada. We also evaluated whether various
oils, added to the spray mixture, could in-
crease or extend the duration of the Viro-
soft CP4"'s efficacy under orchard condi-
tions, by possibly improving coverage and
increasing the penetration of the virus
through the leaf surface.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All treatments were applied to a high
density (1m tree spacing within rows) or-
chard of MacIntosh apple trees at the Pa-
cific Agri-Food Research Centre, Summer-
land, BC.
Virulence of Virosoft CP4 over time
on apples and leaves. Two blocks of five
rows of high density apple trees were
treated with Virosoft CP4° at 239 ml/ha
(original preparation: 4x10'° occlusion
bodies/946.34 ml) on 12 June, 2003 using
an air-blast sprayer set to deliver a volume
of 2,347.6 L/ha. The Virosoft CP4® was
stored refrigerated. An untreated block of
trees separated by > 30 trees in the same
orchard was used as the control. Two hours
after application of the virus, 10 leaves and
apples were randomly collected from the
treatment and the control. Similar collec-
tions were made 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 days
after application of the treatments. The
entire trial was replicated on different
blocks of trees within the same orchard on
3 July, 2003. Mean + SE daily tempera-
tures during the orchard collection (12-24
June:17.6 + 3.0 °C; 3-15 July: 22.5 + 2.3
°C) and the accumulated daily rain that
occurred during the June (0.6 + 1.1 mm/d)
and July replications (0 + 0 mm/d) were
similar to daily temperatures (18.8 + 4.1
°C) and precipitation (0.7 + 2.3 mm/day)
for this area, from 1 June to 15 July, aver-
aged over a 5 y period (1999 - 2004)
(Anon. 2004).
Codling moth neonates used in the as-
says emerged on the same day that the
leaves and apples were collected, from egg
sheets obtained from the colony of the
Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release
Program (Osoyoos, BC). Five neonate cod-
ling moth were placed on the stem end of
each collected apple. The apples were
sealed in plastic cups and incubated at 24
°C, 16:8 h L:D before codling moth sur-
vival was assessed by cutting open the fruit
on days 7 and 14. The total number of live
larvae in the apple bioassays was a more
accurate assessment of the impact of the
virus than percentage mortality as larvae
occasionally could not be found. Some
neonates naturally move off the apple and
die by dessication without feeding in apple
assays (Laing and Jaques 1980); others
disintegrate beyond recognition due to a
viral infection or are difficult to locate.
One disc (1 cm diameter) was cut from
each leaf, avoiding the center vein, within
an hour of their collection and placed on a
layer of stikem (Stikem Special'™, Phero-
Tech Inc., Delta, BC) in a small plastic
petri dish. Ten codling moth neonates were
placed on each leaf disc. The discs, with
the larvae, were placed in the dark for 60
minutes at 22 + 1 °C to encourage feeding.
Larvae that had consumed leaf material
frequently had green coloured alimentary
canals, green frass and a portion of the leaf
surface was scarred. Five larvae which
showed evidence of feeding per leaf were
transferred to the surface of a pinto-bean
based diet (modified from Shorey and Hale
1965) within individual 30-ml plastic cups.
The cups were sealed and incubated at 24
°C, 16:8 h L:D until the number of living
larvae was assessed on days 7 and 14. Data
were analysed using an ANOVA (SAS
2000) and the means were separated within
each day the apples or leaves were col-
lected with individual ANOVAs and
Tukey’s studentized range test.
Virosoft CP4 + oils. In a separate ex-
periment, four blocks of four rows of high
density apple trees were each treated with
Virosoft CP4" alone at 239 mil/ha
(original preparation: 4x10’ occlusion
bodies/946.34 ml), Virosoft CP4” 239 ml/
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
ha + mineral oil (Superior 70 oil, United
Agri Products, Dorchester, ON) at 2L/ha,
Virosoft CP4® 239 ml/ha + fish oil
(Crocker’s Fish Oil, Inc., Quincy, WA) at
2L /ha or Virosoft CP4” 239 ml/ha + once
descummed soybean oil at 2.5 L/ha, 17
June, 2004 using an air-blast sprayer set to
deliver a volume of 1,553.6 L/ha. A block
of untreated trees separated by >10 trees in
the same orchard was used as the control.
Ten apples were randomly collected from
each treatment and the control at least two
hours after application of treatments on
day 0, as well as 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 days
post-treatment. The entire trial was repli-
cated on 28 June 2004 on different blocks
89
of trees within the same orchard. Mean +
SE daily temperatures during the orchard
collection (17-27 June 2: 22.4 + 2.5 °C; 28
June to 8 July: 17.3 + 3.4 °C) and the accu-
mulated rain that occurred during the first
(2.1 + 5.5 mm/day) and second replication
(0.8 + 1.3 mm/day) are similar to mean
daily temperatures and precipitation for
this area, averaged over 5 y, as recorded
above. Bioassays were carried out using
codling moth neonates on the collected
apples as described above. The number of
living larvae were counted seven days post
exposure. Data were analysed as described
for the previous study.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Efficacy of Virosoft CP4 over time on
apples and leaves. The Virosoft CP4® had
an overall significant impact on the num-
ber of codling moth able to survive the
virus treatment, compared to control lar-
vae, when the data were collected both 7
and 14 days post-exposure to field col-
lected apples (7 d: Fi.2. = 77.6, P <
0.0001; 14 d: F;..= 66.7, P < 0.0001).
Significantly fewer codling moth larvae
survived for seven days in apples from
trees treated with the virus, compared to
untreated apples, two hours, and 1, 4, and 8
days post-treatment with Virosoft CP4”
(Table 1). This significant difference be-
tween the number of living larvae in the
treated versus control apples was extended
to 12 days post-treatment when the data
were read on day 14, except in apples col-
lected four days post-treatment (Table 1).
The number of live codling moth larvae
found both in untreated and treated apples
was generally lower over all days, when
the assays were read at 14 versus 7 days,
due to the difficulty locating larvae in the
fruit at the later date. The apples had to be
carefully sectioned to find the larvae and
long term larval mortality data may have
been influenced by decay in the fruit. The
disappearance and death of a small number
of larvae may be partially due to mortality
caused by a colony derived CpGV infec-
tion and subsequent disintegration of the
dead larvae (personal observation). As this
mortality would occur in both treated and
control apples any differences in surviving
codling moth would be attributable to the
treatment. Some additional virus-induced
death would be expected to occur between
days 7 and 14, however, the poor survivor-
ship of larvae in decaying control apples
decreases the value of data obtained at this
later date.
Codling moth larvae died after consum-
ing CpGV in leaf disc assays and Virosoft
CP4” had a significant impact on the num-
ber of codling moth larvae able to survive
the virus treatment, compared to control
larvae (7 d: F, 26 = 12.6, P <0.0005; 14 d:
Fi 26 = 7.5, P <0.0007). Significantly
fewer living codling moth larvae were
found when larvae fed on leaf discs col-
lected two hours and one day post-
treatment from Virosoft CP4® treated trees,
compared to discs from untreated leaves
(Table 1). Similar results were found when
the number of surviving larvae were
counted 7 and 14 days post-exposure. The
leaf disc bioassay was easier to count than
the apple bioassay as more larvae were
found in the former.
The difference in the active persistence
of the virus determined in the apple and
leaf disc bioassays is probably due to neo-
90 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
Mean + SE number of live codling moth larvae found per apple or leaf disc after 7 and 14 days
when neonates were placed on Virosoft CP4™ treated or control apples or leaf discs. Replicated
twice; n= 10 apples or leaves; 5 codling moth larvae per apple and leaf disc.
Mean + SE number of live codling moth larvae per apple and leaf disc
Days post-
treatment Read 7 days post-exposure Read 14 days post-exposure
Virosoft CP4® Control Virosoft CP4® Control
Apples
0 (2h) 0.9+0.2a! 24+0.3b 0.2+0.1a 1.6+£0.3b
l O72=02a 3.140.3b 0.8+0.3a 1740.3 b
4 162024 3.140.3b Le 03 54 19+0.4a
6 26+0.3a 322024 0.9+04a 3.0+0.3b
8 2520.2 4 55202 3 I220224 2.922026
12 2.8+0.3a 3.44+0.3a 2.1403 a 3.0+0.3b
Leaf discs
0 (2h) 2.9403 a 4340.2b 222038 3.6+0.2b
l 4.2+0.2a 48+0.1b 3.34 0.3'4 42+0.2b
4 43+0.2a 46+0.la 3.4403a 40+0.2a
6 4.8+0.la 48+0.la 41+0.2a 3.9+0.2a
8 452024 4520.24 At 02-2 3.9+0.3a
12 46+0.2a 46+02a 41+0.2a 3.9+0.2a
'Means within rows and days post-exposure followed by the same letter are not significantly
different (P > 0.05), determined with Tukey’s studentized range test (SAS 2000).
nates feeding more readily and extensively
on the surface of the apple than on the foli-
age. Glen and Clark (1985) found that 90%
of codling moth neonates hatching from
eggs on leaves spent more than 10 min on
leaves before moving to the fruit. Penetra-
tion of fruit by codling moth has been re-
corded to take 1 to 2.5 h (Geier 1963). As
the neonates in our study were held for 60
minutes on a leaf disc before transferring
them to the diet, each neonate had a realis-
tic, but limited chance to ingest the virus.
Ballard et al. (2000) did not observe feed-
ing by codling moth neonates on leaf tissue
until neonates were left for 15 minutes. It
is also possible that more virus is accumu-
lated near the stem and the calyx ends of
apples (Arthurs and Lacey 2004) and many
of the codling moth neonates choose these
areas of the apple to feed and then pene-
trate. Most wild codling moth would en-
counter CpGV on both the leaf and apple
surfaces, therefore it would be appropriate
to improve these assays by exposing neo-
nates to both treated surfaces to obtain a
more realistic assessment of potential mor-
tality in the orchard.
Virosoft CP4 + oils. The virus treat-
ments had a significant effect on survival
of codling moth larvae (F425 = 32.2, P
<0.001). Significantly fewer living codling
moth larvae were found in apples collected
two hours, one day, and five days post-
treatment from trees treated with Virosoft
CP4® alone, or in combination with any of
the oils, than in the control apples. In ap-
ples collected two, seven and ten days
post-treatment, this difference was not
significant (Table 2). Although the mean
numbers of live codling moth larvae per
apple in Virosoft CP4® treatments in com-
bination with an oil was lower on days 0
and 1, the numbers were not significantly
lower than those in the Virosoft CP4®
treatment alone.
The virulence of the Virosoft CP4®
applied in June and early July, under con-
ditions that are typical for the southern
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 9}
Table 2.
Mean + SE number of live codling moth larvae per apple after 7 days when neonates were
placed on fruit treated with Virosoft CP4" combined with one of three oils, or nothing. Repli-
cated twice; n= 10 apples; 5 codling moth larvae per apple.
Mean + SE number of live codling moth larvae per apple per treatment
Days post- ; ; ® ; ® ‘ ®
treatanent Virosoft Virosoft CP4° + Virosoft CP4 Virosoft CP4
® ; ; : : . Control
CP4 Superior 70 oil + Fish oil + Soybean oil
0 (2h) 1.1+40.4a! 0.6+0.la 0.3+02a 0.3+02a 3.9+0.5b
| 12+03a 0.7+0.la 11+03a 0.7+02a 3.7+0.5b
2 182+0.5a 1.8+0.5a Lis0.1a 16+1.0a 3.5+0.la
5 2.0+0.7a 16+0a 20+02a 19+0.2a 3.9+0.4b
7 2.4+0.7a 192+0.5a 22+£0.7 a 2.00+0.la 3.1+09a
10 20+02a 19+0a 2.3+0.4a 2.0+0.5a 3.1+04a
'Means within rows followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05) as
determined with Tukey’s studentized range test (SAS, 2000).
interior of BC, decreased quickly over time
in both trials. In orchard trials in Washing-
ton State, Arthurs and Lacey (2000) found
a similar decline in activity and estimated a
Virosoft CP4” (3.2 oz/ac) half-life on ap-
ples to be 3.8 to 8.7 d_ post June and July
recognize that our study was carried out
using colony derived larvae and that wild
codling moth larvae may feed on treated
apple tree leaves and fruit differently under
orchard conditions, which may modify the
impact of the virus on the host.
treatments, respectively. It 1s important to
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to B. Tiffin (Pacific
Agri-Food Research Centre, Summerland)
for applying the treatments in the orchard.
REFERENCES
Anon. 2004. PARC Summerland weather. Http://res2.agr.ca/parc-crapac/summerland/ clim/index_e.htm.
Arthurs, S.P. and L.A. Lacey. 2004. Field evaluation of commercial formulations of the codling moth
granulovirus: persistence of activity and success of seasonal applications against natural infestations
of codling moth in Pacific Northwest apple orchards. Biological Control 31: 388-397.
Ballard, J., D.J. Ellis and C.C. Payne. 2000. Uptake of granulovirus from the surface of apples and leaves
by first instar larvae of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Biocontrol
Science and Technology 10: 617-625.
Cross, J.V., M.G. Solomon, D. Chandler, P.J. Jarrett, P.N. Richardson, D. Winstanley, H. Bathon, J.
Huber, B. Keller, G.A. Langenbruch and G. Zimmermann. 1999. Review of biocontrol of pests of
apples and pears in northern and central Europe: 1. Microbial agents and nematodes. Biocontrol Sci-
ence and Technology 9: 125-149.
Eastwell, K.C., J.E. Cossentine and M.G. Bernardy. 1999. Characterization of Cydia pomonella granu-
lovirus from codling moths in a laboratory colony and in orchards in British Columbia. Annals of
Applied Biology 134: 285-291.
Geier, P.W. 1963. The history of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in
the Australian Capital Territory. Australian Journal of Zoology 11: 323-367.
Glen, D.M. and J. Clark. 1985. Death of Cydia pomonella larvae and damage to apple fruit, after field
application of codling moth granulosis virus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 38: 93-96.
Glen, D.M. and C.C. Payne. 1984. Production and field evaluation of codling moth granulosis virus for
control of Cydia pomonella in the United Kingdom. Annals of Applied Biology 104: 87-98.
Jackson, D.M. 1979. Codling moth egg distribution on unmanaged apple trees. Annals of the Entomologi-
92 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
cal Society of America 72: 361-368.
Jaques, R.P. 1975. Persistence, accumulation and denaturation of nuclear polyhedrosis and granulosis
viruses, pp. 90-99. Jn M.D. Summers, R. Engler., L.A. Falcon, and P. Vail (Eds), Baculoviruses for
Insect Pest Control: Safety Considerations. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC.
Jaques, R.P. 1985. Stability of insect viruses in the environment, pp. 285-360. Jn K. Maramorosch and
K.E. Sherman (Eds) Viral Insecticides for Biological Control. Academic Press, New York.
Jaques, R.P., J.E. Laing, D.R. Laing and D.S.K. Yu. 1987. Effectiveness and persistence of the granulosis
virus of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) on apple. The Canadian
Entomologist 119: 1063-1067.
Laing, D.R. and R.P. Jaques. 1980. Codling moth: techniques for rearing larvae and bioassaying granulo-
sis virus. Journal of Economic Entomology 73: 851-853.
SAS 2000. Proc GLM Users Manual Version 8.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Sheppard, H. H. and G.R. Stairs. 1976. Effects of dissemination of low dosage levels of a granulosis virus
in populations of the codling moth. Journal of Economic Entomology 69: 583-586.
Shorey, H.H. and R.L. Hale. 1965. Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial
medium. Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 522-524.
Tanada, Y. 1964. A granulosis virus of codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (Linnaeus) (Olethreutidae,
Lepidoptera). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 6: 378-380.
Tanada, Y. and R. Leutenegger. 1968. Histopathology of a granulosis-virus disease of the codling moth,
Carpocapsa pomonella. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 10: 39-47.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
a3
Species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
in organic apple orchards of British Columbia
R.F. SMITH’, J.E. COSSENTINE’, S.M. RIGBY’
and C.S. SHEFFIELD!
ABSTRACT
In a two year study, 14 genera of Carabidae (Agonum Bonelli, Amara Bonelli, Anisodac-
tylus Dejean, Bembidion Latreille, Carabus Linné, Harpalus Latreille, Lebia Latreille,
Loricera Latreille, Poecilus Bonelli, Prerostichus Bonelli, Scaphinotus Dejean, Stenolo-
phus Stephens, Syntomus Hope and Trechus Clairville) represented by 44 species were
identified from six commercial organic apple orchards in the southern Similkameen
valley in British Columbia, Canada; 13 of these species were not native to the area. The
4,299 specimens were caught in ‘ramp’ pitfall traps, with the genera Prerostichus and
Harpalus comprising 56% and 43%, respectively. Numbers of Carabidae ranged from
11-21 species per orchard, with their presence detected throughout the collection period.
Key Words: Carabidae, diversity, abundance, organic orchards, British Columbia
INTRODUCTION
In North America there are 168 genera
and over 2200 species of ground beetle
(Coleoptera: Carabidae), most of which are
predaceous as adults and larvae (Arnett
1993). Carabids are common in tree fruit
orchards (Edwards 1998) and many other
agricultural (Levesque and Levesque 1994;
Raworth et al. 1997) and natural ecosys-
tems (Brumwell et a/. 1998; Toft and Bilde
2002). Their function as polyphagous
predators within orchards was recognized
in the 1800's (Lord 1983), and several spe-
cies are known to prey on key tree fruit
pests (MacPhee ef al. 1988; Pearsall and
Walde 1994; Sunderland 2002). Eight
species have been reported to feed on lar-
vae of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), one of the key
pests of pome fruit in Canada (Hagley and
Allen 1988; Riddick and Mills 1994).
Carabids are also considered good indi-
cators of ecological change in different
communities (Niemeld et al. 1993; Nie-
mela and Kotze 2000; Szyszko et al. 2000;
Holland 2002; Holland et a/. 2002). Un-
fortunately, many pesticides induce signifi-
cant levels of mortality in carabids
(Eptsein et al. 2000; Smith et al. 2000;
O’Flaherty 2002) and lower levels of fe-
cundity (H. Goulet, Eastern Cereal Oil
Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, pers.
comm.) thereby impacting their potential
for natural biological control in agricul-
tural systems. Despite the significance of
carabids in orchard habitats there have
been few published studies of species di-
versity in the 27,000 ha of Canadian tree
fruit orchards (Herne 1963; Hagley and
Allen 1988; Pearsall and Walde 1995).
Carabids typically are sampled using
pitfall traps (Spence and Niemelé 1994;
Raworth et al. 1997). Bouchard et al.
(2000), improving on the ramp pitfall trap
designed by Bostanian et a/. (1983), devel-
oped a trap with plastic ramps connected to
the upper lip of a container which rested on
the terrain surface. In Nova Scotia, a study
to evaluate this modified version of the
ramp trap for diversity studies in orchards
(Rigby and Smith 2002) indicated a similar
' Atlantic Food & Horticulture Research Centre, 32 Main Street, Kentville, NS, B4N 1J5, Canada
* Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Summerland, BC, VOH 1Z0, Canada
94 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
capture performance to the conventional
pitfall trap, yet expressed several advan-
tages including minimized fouling of sam-
ples by decomposing plant material and
reduced capture of non-target inverte-
brates. In this study, we used these ramp
traps to document carabid species found on
the orchard floor of organically managed
fruit orchards in the southern Similkameen
valley of British Columbia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ramp traps were placed in six commer-
cial, certified organically managed apple
orchards in the southern Similkameen val-
ley in British Columbia (119.736 °W,
49.169 °N to 119.753 °W, 49.182 °N) in
each of two years (1999-2000). Each trap
consisted of two ramps and one plastic
container with a removable snap-on lid
(Figure 1). The container measured 115
mm in diam and 85 mm in height. Two
rectangular notches (45 mm x 40 mm)
were cut in opposite sides of the container
to hold the ramps in place at an angle < 15°
(after Bouchard et a/. 2000) and to serve as
an entrance into the container. The ramps
were made of 0.75 mm thick transparent
copolyester sheets with the upper surface
textured with Speckle Stone black/grey
aerosol paint (Crown North America Pro-
fessional Products, Vaughan, Ontario,
Canada). Ramps were 300 mm long and
300 mm wide at the lower surface, tapering
to 40 mm at the container entrance. The
22 mm lateral edges were folded up at a
90° angle from the surface of the ramp,
and the upper end had a 20 mm flap folded
down to anchor the ramp to the container.
All six orchards were part of an area-
wide codling moth control program which
used a combination of mating disruption
and sterile insect release to suppress moth
populations (Dyck and Gardiner 1992).
Orchards contained a mixture of apple cul-
tivars (mainly McIntosh, Spartan, Red De-
licious and Golden Delicious) and ranged
in size from 0.5 to 4.4 ha. The orchard
floors consisted of bare soil and/or vegeta-
tion (mainly orchard grass and broad leaf
weeds) and were mowed routinely
throughout the cropping season. In each
orchard three ramp traps were placed be-
neath the tree canopy, 15 to 30 m apart.
Samples were collected in a salt water so-
lution (with a droplet of detergent) which
was replaced when samples were removed,
at 7 - 10 day intervals from 23 April - 19
October 1999, and 19 April - 2 November
2000. Samples were stored in 70% ethanol
until carabid specimens were sorted and
identified to species level using the keys of
Canadian and Alaskan Carabidae devel-
oped by Lindroth (1961-1969b). Voucher
specimens are currently held in the Insect
Reference collection at the Agriculture and
Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Food & Horti-
culture Research Centre, Kentville, Nova
Scotia.
Figure 1. Ramp pitfall trap used for collection of Carabidae in organic apple orchards.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
oo
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In the two years of study 44 carabid
species from 14 genera were identified
(Table 1), of which 13 species (30% of
total) were non-indigenous. Non-
indigenous species represented 74% of the
4299 beetles captured. These results are
similar to those found in previous studies
from Nova Scotia: Pearsall and Walde
(1995) collected 28 species from 13 gen-
era, of which nine species (32%) were non-
indigenous; Smith et al. (2000) reported
more than 40 species from 19 genera col-
lected in orchards with 70% of the total
beetles captured being non-indigenous;
O’Flaherty (2002) collected 55 species of
Carabidae representing 18 genera. In that
study, almost 90% of the total beetles
caught were from the 16 non-indigenous
species (O’Flaherty 2002).
In this survey, carabid diversity ranged
from 11 to 28 species per orchard block
(Figure 2). The most frequently collected
genus was Pterostichus Bonelli, with one
introduced species, P. melanarius (lliger)
accounting for almost 56% of the speci-
mens captured in the two years. The sec-
ond most frequently collected genus was
Harpalus Latreille, which represented 43%
of total captures. Many species (46%)
were represented by fewer than three
specimens each (Table 1). Carabid densi-
ties in apple orchards in southern Ontario
were found to be highest in the late sum-
mer and fall (Holliday and Hagley 1979).
Our data documents similar trends, how-
ever, the majority of carabids collected
were of two species, Harpalus pensylvani-
cus (DeGeer) and P. melanarius (Figure
3).
Published data are sparse regarding
carabid prey species, but it is generally
noted that there is a positive correlation
between the size of beetles and that of prey
attacked (Larochelle 1990; O’Flaherty
2002). Three of the carabid species col-
lected in this study, Amara _ aenea
(DeGeer), Harpalus affinis (Schrank) and
Pterostichus melanarius, have been re-
ported as codling moth predators (Hagley
and Allen 1988; Riddick and Mills 1994),
but the orchards used in this survey had
low codling moth densities (J. Cossentine,
pers. obs.), so it is unlikely that it was a
primary source of food for these carabid
species. However, the generalist predatory
tendencies of carabid beetles make them
beneficial in orchard ecosystems, since
other important pest species serve as food
sources (Larochelle 1990; Sunderland
2002).
The species composition of carabid
beetles within orchards and most ecosys-
tems in North America appears to be
changing with the arrival and successful
establishment of non-indigenous species.
Jarrett and Scudder (2001) list 19 new
British Columbia carabid records and indi-
cate that several of these have been intro-
duced into North America, some with dis-
junct east and/or west coast distributions.
Clearly, both Atlantic and Pacific coast-
lines serve as arrival points for many spe-
cies (Jarrett and Scudder 2001), of which
many are well established (Bousquet and
Larochelle 1993). Within 10 years, it ap-
pears that native Pferostichus coracinus
(Newman), reported by Pearsall and Walde
(1995) as comprising over 40% of ground
beetles in Nova Scotia orchards, has been
displaced by the introduced P. melanarius.
O’Flaherty (2002) failed to collect P.
coracinus, while P. melanarius accounted
for over 45% of beetles captured in that
study. Similarly in Nova Scotia, it appears
that the native Harpalus pensylvanicus 1s
being displaced by H. rufipes, which ac-
counted for a large proportion of the bee-
tles caught by Pearsall and Walde (1995)
and O’Flaherty (2002). Although Prerosti-
chus melanarius is common in British Co-
lumbia (Table 1; Raworth ef al. 1997),
Harpalus rufipes (DeGeer) has not yet
been recorded in this province (Bousquet
and Larochelle 1993). As such, H. pensyl-
vanicus is still the most common represen-
tative of this genus in orchards.
As carabids represent a yet unresolved
biological control resource in Canadian
96 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
The number and percentage of Carabidae captured in ramp traps in six organically managed apple
orchards in British Columbia for 1999 and 2000. Species marked with an asterisk (*) are non-
indigenous.
Rare 1999 2000
P Total % Total %
*4gonum muelleri (Herbst) 45 4.14 65 2.02
*4gonum placidum (Say) ] 0.09 15 0.47
*Amara aenea (DeGeer) 1 0.09 16 0.50
*4Amara apricaria (Paykull) 2 0.18 64 2.00
*Amara aulica (Panzer) — — ] 0.03
Amara avida (Say) 7 0.64 8 O25
Amara californica californica Dejean ~ ~ 4 0.13
Amara cupreolata Putzeys iil 1.01 i 0.22
*4Amara familiaris (Duftschmid) 21 1.93 48 1.49
Amara latior (Kirby) en 1.93 79 2.46
Amara littoralis Mannerheim _ oe ] 0.03
Amara musculis (Say) - - 6 0.19
Amara obesa (Say) - - 5 0.16
Amara carinata (LeConte) ] 0.09 B 0.06
*Anisodactylus binotatus (Fabricius) 23 2.12 64 1.99
Anisodactylus californicus Dejean - - ] 0.03
Anisodactylus harrisii LeConte 5 0.46 1] 0.34
Anisodactylus nigerrimus (Dejean) 4 0.36 84 262
*Bembidion lampros (Herbst) 59 5.43 70 2.18
*Bembidion quadrimaculattum dubitans (LeConte) ] 0.09 - -
Bembidion rupicola (Kirby) ] 0.09 = —
*Carabus granulatus granulatus Linné 22 2,02 40 e253
Carabus taedatus Fabricius ] 0.09 — —
*Harpalus affinis (Schrank) 87 8.00 118 3.67
Harpalus carbonatus LeConte ] 0.09 = _
Harpalus fraternus LeConte ] 0.09 2 0.06
Harpalus herbivagus Say — — ] 0.03
Harpalus nigritarsis C.R. Sahlberg ] 0.09 i) 0.09
Harpalus pensylvanicus (DeGeer) 283 26.03 472 14.69
Harpalus seclusus Casey 33 3.04 47 1.46
Harpalus solitaris Dejean - — ] 0.03
Harpalus somnulentus Dejean = — 6 0.19
Lebia viridis Say ] 0.09 — —
Loricera pilicornis (Fabricius) 2 0.18 5 0.16
Poecilus lucublandus (Say) — - 10 0.31
Pterostichus adstrictus Eschscholtz 2 0.18 ] 0.03
Pterostichus corvinus (Dejean) ] 0.09 — =
*Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) 446 41.03 1951 60.74
Pterostichus mutus (Say) _ - l 0.03
Scaphinotus marginatus (Fischer von Waldheim) — - ] 0.03
Stenolophus conjunctus (Say) — ~ l 0.03
Stenolophus unicolor Dejean l 0.09 _ —
Syntomus americanus (Dejean) ] 0.09 — =
*Trechus obtusus Erichson 1 0.09 1 0.03
Total number captured 1087 3212
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 97
Number of Carabid Species
BM i000 G 2000
Organic Orchard Number
Figure 2. Mean number of Carabidae species captured in ramp pitfall traps in each of six or-
ganically managed British Columbia apple orchards in 1999 and 2000.
carabids captured per trap carabids caplured per trap
carabids captured per trap
Harpalus pensylvanicus
(é] lceaciomal a
April 23 May 13 June 10 July 7 Aug 13 Sept 17 Nov 2
sample date
Harpalus affinis
0 :
April 23. May13 June 10 July 7 Aug 13 Sept 17 Nov 2
sample date
Pterostichus melanarius
0
April 23 May 13 June 10 July 7 Aug 13 Sept 17 Nov 2
sample date
————" 4999 —— - 2000
Figure 3. Phenology of three prominent carabid species as monitored by ramp pitfall traps in
six organically managed apple orchards in British Columbia: Harpalus pensylvanicus (upper
graph), H. affinis (middle graph) and Pterostichus melanarius (lower graph).
98 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
orchards, it would be opportune to better will require further monitoring of carabid
understand what they are consuming in the populations throughout these ecosystems,
orchards, and how best we can augment and continued assessment of their chang-
their consumption of pest species. This ing proportions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Linda Jen- Cereal Oil Research Centre, Ottawa, On-
sen, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, tario for confirmation of species identifica-
Summerland, British Columbia for techni- tions.
cal assistance, and Henri Goulet, Eastern
REFERENCES
Arnett, R.H. 1993. American Insects. A Handbook of Insects of America North of Mexico. Sandhill Crane
Press Inc. Gainsville, Florida.
Bouchard, P., T. Wheeler and H. Goulet. 2000. Design for a low-cost, covered ramp pitfall trap. The Ca-
nadian Entomologist 132: 387-387.
Bostanian, N.J., G. Boivin and H. Goulet. 1983. Ramp pitfall trap. Journal of Economic Entomology 76:
1473-1475.
Bousquet, Y. and A. Larochelle. 1993. Catalogue of the Geadephaga (Coleoptera: Trachypachidae, Rhy-
sodidae, Carabidae including Cicindelini) of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the Entomologi-
cal Society of Canada 167: 3-397.
Brumwell, L.J., K.G. Craig and G.G.E Scudder. 1998. Litter spiders and carabid beetles in a successional
Douglas-fir forest in British Columbia. Northwest Science 72: 94-95.
Dyck, V.A. and M.G.T. Gardiner. 1992. Sterile-insect release programme to control the codling moth
Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera:Olethreutidae) in British Columbia, Canada. Acta Phytopathology
Entomologia Hungarica 27:219-222.
Edwards, L. 1998. Organic Tree Fruit Management. Certified Organic Associations of British Columbia.
Aurora Publishing Services, Summerland, B.C.
Epstein, D., R. Zack, J. Brunner, L. Gut and J. Brown. 2000. Effects of broad-spectrum insecticides on
epigeal arthropod biodiversity in Pacific Northwest apple orchards. Environmental Entomology 29:
340-348.
Hagley, E.A.C. and W.R. Allen. 1988. Ground beetles (Carabidae) as predators of codling moth, Cydia
pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist 120: 917-925.
Herne, D.H.C. 1963. Carabids collected in a DDT-sprayed peach orchard in Ontario (Coleoptera:
Carabidae). The Canadian Entomologist 95: 357-362.
Holiday, N.J. and E.A.C. Hagley. 1979. Distribution and density of carabid beetles (Coleoptera) in a pest
management apple orchard. The Canadian Entomologist 111: 759-770.
Holland, J.M. 2002. Carabid beetles: their ecology, survival and use in agroecosystems, pp. 1-40. Jn: J.M.
Holland (Ed.), The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.
Holland, J.M., G.K. Frampton and P.J. van den Brink. 2002. Carabids as indicators within temperate ar-
able farming systems: implications from SCARAB and LINK integrated farming systems projects, pp.
251-277. In: J.M. Holland (Ed.), The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.
Jarrett, J.R. and G.G.E. Scudder. 2001. Carabidae (Coleoptera) new to British Columbia, with one species
new to Canada. The Coleopterists Bulletin 55: 378-384.
Larochelle A. 1990. The Food of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Including Cicindelinae). Fabre-
ries Supplement 5: 1—132.
Levesque, C. and G.-V. Levesque. 1994. Abundance and seasonal activity of ground beetles (Coleoptera:
Carabidae) in a raspberry plantation and adjacent sites in southern Quebec (Canada). Journal of the
Kansas Entomological Society 67: 73-101.
Lindroth, C.H. 1961. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 2.
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 20: 1-200.
Lindroth, C.H. 1963. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 3.
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 24: 201-408.
Lindroth, C.H. 1966. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 4.
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 29: 408-648.
Lindroth, C.H. 1968. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 5.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 99
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 33: 649-944.
Lindroth, C.H. 1969a. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 1.
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 35: I-XLVIII.
Lindroth, C.H. 1969b. The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 6.
Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum 34: 945-1192.
Lord, F.T. 1983. The development of agricultural entomology in Nova Scotia. Proceedings of the Nova
Scotia Institute of Science 33: 19-46.
MacPhee, A., A. Newton and K.B. McRae. 1988. Population studies on the winter moth Operophtera
brumata (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in apple orchards in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Entomolo-
gist 120: 73-83.
Niemela, J. and D.J. Kotze. 2000. GLOBENET: the search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodi-
versity using carabids, pp. 241-246. Jn: P. Brandmayr, G. Lovei, T.Z. Brandmayr, A. Casale and A.V.
Taglianti (Eds.), Natural History and Applied Ecology of Carabid Beetles. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia,
Bulgaria.
Niemela, J., D. Langor and J.R. Spence. 1993. Effects of clearcut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle as-
semblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conservation Biology 7: 551-561.
O’Flaherty, C. 2002. Carabidae phenology and species diversity in Nova Scotia apple orchards. MSc The-
sis, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS.
Pearsall, I.A. and S.J. Walde. 1994. Parasitism and predation as agents of mortality of winter moth popu-
lations in neglected apple orchards in Nova Scotia. Ecological Entomology 19: 190-198.
Pearsall, I.A. and S.J. Walde. 1995. A comparison of epigaeic Coleoptera assemblages in organic, conven-
tional and abandoned orchards in Nova Scotia Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 127: 641-658.
Raworth, D.A., S. J. Clements, C. Cirkony and Y. Bousquet. 1997. Carabid beetles in commercial rasp-
berry fields in the Fraser Valley of BritishColumbia and a sampling protocol for Pterostichus
melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 94:51-
57.
Riddick, E.W. and N.J. Mills. 1994. Potential of adult carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as predators of
fifth-instar codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple orchards in California. Environmental
Entomology 23:1338-1345.
Rigby, S. and R. Smith. 2002. A better mouse trap? Evaluating the ramp pitfall trap. p 124. /n: Proceed-
ings, International IPM Conference’. March 24-26 2002. Toronto Canada. Entomological Society of
Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Smith, R.F., C.O’Flaherty, S. Rigby, S. Gaul and H. Goulet. 2000. Fauna dynamics within a prototype
Integrated Fruit Production orchard, Nova Scotia, Canada. In IVth Symposium of Horticulture Sci-
ence Working Group on Integrated Fruit Production. Ku-Leuven, Belgium.
Spence, J.R. and J.K. Niemelé. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and
the method. The Canadian Entomologist 126: 881-894.
Sunderland, K.D. 2002. Invertebrate pest control by carabids, pp. 165-214. Jn: J.M. Holland (Ed.), The
Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.
Szyszko, J., H.J.W. Vermeulen, K. Klimaszewski, M. Abs and A. Schwerk. 2000. Mean individual bio-
mass (MIB) of ground beetles (Carabidae) as an indicator of the state of the environment, pp. 289-294.
In: P. Brandmayr, G. Lévei, T.Z. Brandmayr, A. Casale and A.V. Taglianti (Eds.), Natural History
and Applied Ecology of Carabid Beetles. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Toft, S. and T. Bilde. 2002. Carabid diets and food value, pp. 81-110. Jn: J.M. Holland (Ed.), The
Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.
100 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 10]
Phenology of emergence from artificial overwintering
Shelters by some predatory arthropods common
in pear orchards of the Pacific Northwest
DAVID R. HORTON!
ABSTRACT
The phenology of emergence from artificial overwintering shelters that had been placed
in pear orchards located near Yakima, Washington, was determined for the green lace-
wing Chrysopa nigricornis Burmeister, the predatory mirid Deraeocoris brevis (Uhler),
and the brown lacewing Hemerobius ovalis Carpenter. Cumulative emergence from
shelters was determined in 2001 and 2002 on both a calendar-date and degree-day basis.
Similar data for a major pear pest, pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Forster), were also
collected for these same shelters. Pear psylla and H. ovalis emerged earliest, both taxa
completing emergence by early March (120 degree-days accumulated from early Janu-
ary). Deraeocoris brevis emerged beginning in late February and finished emergence
by early April (150 degree-days for 90% emergence). Chrysopa nigricornis emerged
considerably later than the other species, and completed emergence by late May or early
June. Calendar-date emergence is also shown for spiders (Araneae) and Anthocoridae
(Heteroptera), which occurred at lower numbers in the shelters. The anthocorids, Orius
tristicolor White and three species of Anthocoris, emerged from shelters in February and
March, while spiders emerged over a long interval between March and May.
Key Words: overwintering, spring emergence, biological control, pear psylla, green
lacewings, brown lacewings, predatory Heteroptera
INTRODUCTION
Many species of predatory arthropods
overwinter in pear orchards of the Pacific
Northwest (Horton et a/. 2001, 2002), and
it is likely that some of these taxa provide
biological control of orchard pests in
spring. As broad-spectrum insecticides are
used less extensively and selective controls
such as mating disruption are put into
place, pear growers in the Pacific North-
west may benefit from increased levels of
biological control (Knight 1994; Gut and
Brunner 1998). Yet, for many predatory
taxa, much remains unknown about certain
life history characteristics, including dia-
pause, overwintering biology, and post-
diapause development. Here, I describe
phenology of emergence from overwinter-
ing quarters for several predatory species
known to overwinter in orchards (Horton
et al. 2002). Late-winter and early-spring
control of pear pests such as pear psylla,
Cacopsylla pyricola (Forster), 1s important
for season-long management (Westigard
and Zwick 1972), and results reported here
should assist growers in better predicting
when certain predators are likely to be ac-
tive in their orchards.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tree bands of corrugated cardboard
were used to provide overwintering shel-
ters for arthropods. Cardboard bands have
been used to monitor a variety of overwin-
tering predatory arthropods, including
Neuroptera (New 1967; Mizell and Schiff-
USDA-ARS, 5230 Konnowac Pass Rd., Wapato, WA, United States 98951
102 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
hauer 1987; Horton et a/. 2002), spiders
(Horton et a/. 2001), and Heteroptera (Fye
1985; Horton et al. 2002), all taxa that
were monitored in the present study. Each
band was 7.6 cm wide and long enough to
completely encircle the trunk of the pear
tree 0.2 to 0.3 m above the orchard floor.
Corrugations in the cardboard were ca. 4 x
5 mm, which is large enough to allow ar-
thropods the size of adult Neuroptera to
colonize the corrugations. Ten trees were
banded in each of 19 and 24 orchards in
October or November of 2000 and 2001,
respectively. Orchards were primarily
‘Bartlett? and ‘D’Anjou’ varieties, of vari-
ous ages. The orchards extended from the
eastern Yakima Valley (Zillah and Parker,
Yakima County, WA) to the western part
of the valley (Yakima, Cowiche, and Tie-
ton, Yakima County, WA). Pest control
practices included a range of management
programs from conventional insecticidal to
organic.
The bands were removed from the field
in the first week of January 2001 and 2002
and placed in white plastic boxes (100 x 40
x 24 cm). The boxes had organdy screen-
ing on the top and four sides to allow air
circulation. A separate container was used
for each orchard. Bands and containers
were then placed in a large shed enclosed
on 3 sides by wire screening, located 15
km southeast of Yakima, WA. The shed
was not heated or lighted.
Containers were checked every 3 or 4
days beginning in early January and ending
in early June of both years. The lid, sides,
and floor of each container were examined
for pear psylla, predatory insects, and spi-
ders. Arthropods were counted and aspi-
rated into vials. Specimens other than
Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae were dis-
carded after having been counted. The
lacewings were taken to the laboratory for
further examination. Chrysopids were
identified as Chrysopa nigricornis Bur-
meister using the key in Penny ef al.
(2000). A subsample (n = 42) of Hemero-
biidae was examined; all specimens were
identified as Hemerobius ovalis Carpenter
(Kevan and Klimaszewski 1987). Voucher
specimens of C. nigricornis and H. ovalis
are in the collection of the author.
Temperature in the shed was recorded
at hourly intervals using a Hobo data log-
ger (Onset Computer Corporation, Bourne,
MA) placed in one of the containers. In
the first year of the study, a second Hobo
recorder was placed in a pear orchard lo-
cated 500 m south of the shed, to deter-
mine whether temperatures in the shed
were similar to those occurring in the
neighboring orchard. The Hobo unit was
placed in a white, ventilated wooden box
(15 x 30 x 30 cm) at 1.5 m above ground.
Cumulative percent emergence from
shelters was expressed as a function of
calendar-date and as a function of accumu-
lated degree-days. Emergence curves were
developed for the 3 predatory taxa most
abundant in the bands, which were two
lacewings, C. nigricornis and H. ovalis,
and a muirid bug, Deraeocoris brevis
(Uhler). One pest species, pear psylla, was
also monitored. For some less common
taxa (spiders, Anthocoridae), emergence
from bands was summarized for two-week
intervals and presented in tabular form.
“Emergence” used throughout the manu-
script refers to the dates that the arthropods
were aspirated from the walls of the con-
tainer. Certain arthropods (e.g., jumping
spiders [Salticidae]) may have moved in
and out of the corrugations, and for these
taxa it is not clear that “emergence”, as
used here, necessarily reflects what occurs
in the field.
Data from the Hobo recorders were
used to calculate degree-days by means of
a program available on the Oregon State
University web-site (Coop 1999). The
calculations were done using the single
sine curve method and a lower threshold of
5 °C. Accumulations both years began
when the bands were placed in the
screened shed (8 January 2001 and 10
January 2002).
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
103
RESULTS
Temperatures were higher in 2002 than
2001 (Fig. 1). In 2001, when both the
screened shed and the neighboring orchard
were monitored, temperatures were higher
in the shed than in the orchard. Thus, data
presented below expressing emergence as
a function of calendar-date probably show
emergence from bands to have occurred
earlier than that taking place naturally in
the neighboring orchard.
Pear psylla were extremely abundant in
the bands both years (Table 1). Of the
natural enemies, C. nigricornis, D. brevis,
and H. ovalis occurred at the highest densi-
ties. Less common were spiders and An-
thocoridae (Orius tristicolor (White), An-
thocoris spp.). Anthocoris spp. included A.
antevolens White, A. whitei Reuter, and A.
tomentosus Péricart. Species’ identifica-
tions were not made for all samples, so I
combined the three species as Anthocoris
spp.
Pear psylla and H. ovalis began emerg-
ing from bands by early February in both
years of the study (Fig. 2). Psylla had
completed emergence by early March
(2001) and early February (2002); the dif-
ference in calendar dates the two years
reflects the warmer temperatures in 2002
than 2001 (Fig. 1). Hemerobius ovalis had
finished emergence by early March. As
with pear psylla, emergence occurred ear-
lier in 2002 than 2001. Deraeocoris brevis
began appearing in containers in late Feb-
ruary both years and had finished emer-
gence by the middle of March in 2002 and
1000
800
Cumulative degree-days
riperesintt Seek as
early April in 2001 (Fig. 2). Chrysopa
nigricornis was considerably later in emer-
gence than the other two predatory taxa,
and completed emergence by the middle of
May in 2002 and by early June in 2001.
Emergence in 2001 did not begin until
early May; by this time in 2002, C. nigri-
cornis had achieved 50% emergence.
Emergence from shelters was also ex-
pressed as a function of cumulative degree-
days (Fig. 3). Full emergence from shel-
ters by pear psylla required few heat units.
Hemerobius ovalis had completed 90% of
emergence by 73 and 111 cumulative de-
gree-days in 2001 and 2002, respectively.
Curves for D. brevis were very similar the
two years, and this species required about
150 degree-days to complete 90% emer-
gence from shelters (Fig. 3). Chrvsopa
nigricornis began emerging from bands at
about 400 degree-days, and required 600 to
730 degree-days to complete 90% emer-
gence. Fifty percent emergence for C.
nigricornis required 500 and 520 cumula-
tive degree-days in 2001 and 2002, respec-
tively. Curves for C. nigricornis were very
similar in the two years until at the end of
the emergence period, when emergence
from bands in 2001 was slower than in
2002 (Fig. 3).
Spiders emerged over a fairly broad
interval (Table 2), probably because this
taxon comprised a mix of species. The
anthocorids emerged in late February and
early March (Table 2).
1 Feb.
1 Mar.
1 April 1 May 1 June
Figure 1. Accumulated degree-days within shed, 2001 (closed circles) and 2002 (closed trian-
gles), and in an orchard neighboring the shed, 2001 (open circles).
104 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 1.
Cumulative numbers of common arthropods emerging from cardboard bands in Jan-June of
2001 (N = 190) and 2002 (N = 240).
2001 2002
Cacopsylla pyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae) 4638 4778
Chrysopa nigricornis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) 237 163
Deraeocoris brevis (Heteroptera: Miridae) 159 235
Hemerobius ovalis (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae) 136 11]
Spiders (Araneae) 42 104
Orius tristicolor (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) 6 69
Anthocoris spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) 8 66
Pear psylla
100 H. ovalis
C. nigricornis
D. brevis
100 +
Cumulative percent emergence
1 Feb. 1 Mar. 1 April 1 May 1 June
Figure 2. Cumulative emergence from bands in 2001 and 2002 by pear psylla (solid circles),
Hemerobius ovalis (inverted triangles), Deraeocoris brevis (open circles), and Chrysopa nigri-
cornis (triangles) versus calendar date (cf. Table 1). Dotted lines depict 50 and 90% cumulative
emergence.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 105
2001
100 PMmOOCIOO OO Oo. oO G R Q00
<i ce Re Reel
80} & ee
@
7 O &
a ocd ee eee iaade scnenisetn aes
40) @
| Y ra @ Pear psylta
20 eo YM. evalis
4 CC. nigricornis |
© OD. brevis |
as eee ==
0 AA AAA
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Cumulative percent emergence
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Cumulative degree-days
Figure 3. Cumulative emergence from bands in 2001 and 2002 by pear psylla (solid circles),
Hemerobius ovalis (inverted triangles), Deraeocoris brevis (open circles), and Chrysopa nigri-
cornis (triangles) versus accumulated degree-days (cf. Table 1). Dotted lines depict 50 and
90% cumulative emergence.
Table 2.
Numbers of spiders, Orius tristicolor and Anthocoris spp. (A. antevolens, A. whitei, A. tomen-
tosus) emerging from bands in 2001 and 2002 versus calendar date.
2001 2002
Spiders Spiders Orius tristicolor Anthocoris spp.
1-15 Jan 0 ] 3 l
16-31 Jan 0 10 19 fi
1-15 Feb 0 7 35 16
16-28 Feb 5 7 10 22
1-15 Mar 8 18 2 9
16-31 Mar 8 25 0 7
1-15 Apr 9 23 0 +
16-30 Apr 6 10 0 0
1-15 May 5 3 0 0
16-31 May l 0 0 0
106 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
DISCUSSION
With reduced use of broad-spectrum
insecticides and increased use of selective
controls such as mating disruption or nar-
row-spectrum insecticides, fruit growers in
the Pacific Northwest may experience in-
creased levels of biological control in their
orchards (Westigard et a/. 1968; Knight
1994). Results reported here and else-
where (Horton eft a/. 2001, 2002) indicate
that a large diversity of predatory arthro-
pods may overwinter in pear orchards.
Horton et al. (2001, 2002) described sea-
sonal phenology of autumn entry into over-
wintering shelters by natural enemies in
pear orchards. Practical aims were to tell
growers whether late-season insecticide
applications, if made, would occur while
predatory arthropods were still active in
the orchard. In the present study, I exam-
ined phenology of emergence from over-
wintering quarters. Calendar-day or de-
gree-day models for use in_ predicting
emergence from overwintering sites in
deciduous fruit or nut orchards in North
America have been developed for both pest
(Bergh and Judd 1993) and _ predator
(Felland et al. 1995; Mizell and Schiff-
hauer 1987) species.
Of the four most common taxa that
emerged from the bands, pear psylla was
the most abundant (Table 1). This insect 1s
among the most damaging arthropod pests
of pears in North America and Europe
(Westigard and Zwick 1972; Solomon ef
al. 1989). Pear psylla overwinters in the
adult stage as a distinct morphological
phenotype, the winterform, which began
appearing in pear orchards of the study
area in early September. The species is
active at cool temperatures, and can be
seen moving about on the pear tree in mid-
winter on sunny days. Pear psylla began
emerging from the bands after only mini-
mal accumulation of heat units (Fig. 3).
Egg-laying in the study area commences
by March (Horton 1999).
A green lacewing, C. nigricornis, was
also abundant both years in the bands (see
also Horton et a/. 2002). This green lace-
wing is a common inhabitant of deciduous
fruit and nut orchards (Grasswitz and Burts
1995; Szentkiralyi 2001), apparently as a
generalist predator of soft-bodied insects
such as aphids, mealybugs, and psyllids
(Toschi 1965; Grasswitz and Burts 1995); I
have reared C. nigricornis to the adult
stage on a diet of nymphs and eggs of pear
psylla (DRH, unpublished data). Chrysopa
nigricornis has a facultative diapause con-
trolled by photoperiod, and overwinters as
a third instar within the cocoon (Tauber
and Tauber 1972). The species emerged
from overwintering shelters considerably
later in the season than the other predator
or pest species monitored here, and had not
completed emergence until well into May
both years (Fig. 2). Mizell and Schiff-
hauer (1987) showed that C. nigricornis
emerged from overwintering — shelters
placed in pecan orchards of Georgia begin-
ning in late March and early April, much
later than spiders and a coccinellid beetle
common in those orchards.
The brown lacewing H. ovalis, like pear
psylla, began emerging from bands after
only minimal accumulation of heat units
(Fig. 3). Species of Hemerobiidae often
show activity or development at relatively
cool temperatures (Neuenschwander 1976;
Canard and Volkovich 2001), so their
emergence in late winter is not unexpected.
Biology of Hemerobius species, including
diapause and overwintering, is poorly de-
scribed. Within the Hemerobiidae, all
stages from egg to adult have been re-
corded to overwinter (Canard and Volk-
ovich 2001). In the present study, brown
lacewings emerged from the bands as
adults, and I assume that they overwintered
in this stage. Adults of several
Hemerobius species, including H. ovalis,
have been collected in mid-winter in areas
of the Pacific northwest (Foster 1942;
Kevan and Klimaszewski 1987), which is
additional evidence that this species over-
winters in the adult stage. The role of
brown lacewings in orchards has not been
systematically studied, despite their fairly
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
regular appearance in temperate zone or-
chards (Szentkiralyi 2001). McMullen and
Jong (1967) reported that H. pacificus
Banks preyed upon eggs and nymphs of
pear psylla in Canadian pear orchards,
while Nickel ef al. (1965) stated that H.
angustus Banks provided biological con-
trol of psylla in California pear orchards.
Deraeocoris brevis has a facultative
diapause controlled by photoperiod, over-
wintering in the adult stage (Horton ef al.
1998). This species emerged from bands
beginning in late February or early March,
and had completed emergence by mid- to
late-March. Deraeocoris brevis preys ex-
tensively on soft-bodied arthropods such as
aphids and psyllids (McMullen and Jong
1967; Messing and AliNiazee 1985) and
occupies a variety of habitats including
pear and apple orchards (Horton and Lewis
2000). When pear psylla is at high densi-
ties in pear orchards, this predator may be
among the most abundant of natural ene-
mies in the orchard (Westigard ef al.
1968). McMullen and Jong (1967) stated
that D. brevis is second in importance only
to species of Anthocoris as a predator of
pear psylla in pear orchards of the Pacific
northwest.
Maximal use of natural enemies in or-
107
chards requires improved understanding of
natural enemy biology, including overwin-
tering biology. Horton and Lewis (2000)
described use of natural habitats and or-
chards for overwintering by various spe-
cies of predatory arthropods, while Horton
et al. (2001, 2002) described late-season
phenology of predators entering overwin-
tering shelters. By knowing when preda-
tors emerge from overwintering quarters,
growers would have a better idea about the
potential for biological control early in the
season, a critical time for managing pests
such as pear psylla. Results reported here
suggest that at least one known important
predator of pear psylla, D. brevis, emerged
from shelters early enough in late winter
that it could be active in pear orchards at
the same time that overwintered pear
psylla would be depositing substantial
numbers of eggs (March and April). The
data also suggest, however, that D. brevis
and several other taxa (H. ovalis, O. tristi-
color, Anthocoris spp.) could be active in
Pacific Northwest orchards at the time of
the earliest insecticide sprays. Thus, it
seems possible that these predators could
be exposed to those early-season pest con-
trol practices.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Deb Broers, Merilee Bayer, and
Dan Hallauer for assistance. Taxonomic
help was provided by Tamera Lewis and
Gene Miliczky. The comments of Rick
Hilton, Alan Knight, and Pete Landolt on
a previous version of this manuscript are
appreciated. This research was partially
supported by the Winter Pear Control
Committee.
REFERENCES
Bergh, J.C. and G.J.R. Judd. 1993. Degree-day model for predicting emergence of pear rust mite (Acari:
Eriophyidae) deutogynes from overwintering sites. Environmental Entomology 22: 1325-1332.
Canard, M. and T.A. Volkovich. 2001. Outlines of lacewing development, pp. 130-153. Jn P. McEwen,
T.R. New and A.E. Whittington (eds.). Lacewings in the Crop Environment.
Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Cambridge University
Coop, L.B. 1999. Online phenology models and degree-day calculator. Oregon State University Inte-
grated Plant Protection Center Web Site. (http://pnwpest.org/cgi-bin/ddmodel/pl).
Felland, C.M., D.J. Biddinger and L.A. Hull. 1995. Overwintering emergence and trapping of adult
Stethorus punctum punctum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Pennyslvania apple orchards.
mental Entomology 24: 110-115.
Environ-
Foster, R.E. 1942. Insects active throughout the winter at Vancouver, B.C. Part I: Introduction and _ lists
of the Coleoptera and Neuroptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 38:
19-23.
108 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Fye, R.E. 1985. Corrugated fiberboard traps for predators overwintering in orchards. Journal of Eco-
nomic Entomology 78: 1511-1514.
Grasswitz, T.R. and E.C. Burts. 1995. Effect of native natural enemies on the population dynamics of the
grape mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus (Hom.: Pseudococcidae), in apple and pear orchards. Ento-
mophaga 40: 105-117.
Gut, L.J. and J.F. Brunner. 1998. Pheromone-based management of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortrici-
dae) in Washington apple orchards. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 15: 387-405.
Horton, D.R. 1999. Monitoring of pear psylla for pest management decisions and research. Integrated
Pest Management Reviews 4: 1-20.
Horton, D.R. and T.M. Lewis. 2000. Seasonal distribution of Anthocoris spp. and Deraeocoris brevis
(Heteroptera: Anthocoridae, Miridae) in orchard and non-orchard habitats of central Washington.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 476-485.
Horton, D.R., T.M. Lewis, T. Hinojosa and D.A. Broers. 1998. Photoperiod and reproductive diapause in
the predatory bugs Anthocoris tomentosus, A. antevolens, and Deraeocoris brevis (Heteroptera:, An-
thocoridae, Miridae), with information on overwintering sex ratios. Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 91: 81-86.
Horton, D.R., E.R. Miliczky, D.A. Broers, R.R. Lewis and C.O. Calkins. 2001. Numbers, diversity, and
phenology of spiders (Araneae) overwintering in cardboard bands placed in pear and apple orchards of
central Washington. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 405-414.
Horton, D.R., D.A. Broers, T. Hinojosa, T.M. Lewis, E.R. Miliczky and R.R. Lewis. 2002. Diversity and
phenology of predatory arthropods overwintering in cardboard bands placed in pear and apple or-
chards of central Washington State. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95: 469-480.
Kevan, D.K. McE. and J. Klimaszewski. 1987. The Hemerobiidae of Canada and Alaska. Genus
Hemerobius L. Giornale Italiano di Entomologia 3: 305-369.
Knight, A.L. 1994. Insect pest and natural enemy populations in paired organic and conventional apple
orchards in the Yakima valley, Washington. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Colum-
bia 91: 27-36.
McMullen, R.D. and C. Jong. 1967. New records and discussion of predators of the pear psylla, Psy/la
pyricola Forster, in British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 64:
35-40.
Messing, R.H. and M.T. AliNiazee. 1985. Natural enemies of Myzocallis coryli (Hom.: Aphididae) in
Oregon hazelnut orchards. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 82: 14-18.
Mizell, R.F., HI and D.E. Schiffhauer. 1987. Trunk traps and overwintering predators in pecan orchards:
survey of species and emergence times. Florida Entomologist 70: 238-244.
Neuenschwander, P. 1976. Biology of the adult Hemerobius pacificus. Environmental Entomology 5: 96-
100.
New, T.R. 1967. Trap-banding as a collecting method for Neuroptera and their parasites, and some results
obtained. Entomologist’s Gazette 18: 37-44.
Nickel, J.L., J.T. Shimizu and T.T.Y. Wong. 1965. Studies on natural control of pear psylla in California.
Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 970-976.
Penny, N.D., C.A. Tauber and T. De Leon. 2000. A new species of Chrysopa from western North Amer-
ica with a key to North American species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological
Society of America 93: 776-784.
Solomon, M.G., J.E. Cranham, M.A. Easterbrook and J.D. Fitzgerald. 1989. Control of the pear psyllid,
Cacopsylla pyricola, in south east England by predators and pesticides. Crop Protection 8: 197-205.
Szentkiralyi, F. 2001. Lacewings in fruit and nut crops, pp. 172-238. Jn P. McEwen, T.R. New and A.E.
Whittington (eds.). Lacewings in the Crop Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
U.K.
Tauber, M.J. and C.A. Tauber. 1972. Larval diapause in Chrysopa nigricornis: sensitive stages, critical
photoperiod, and termination (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
15: 105-111.
Toschi, C.A. 1965. The taxonomy, life histories, and mating behavior of the green lacewings of Straw-
berry Canyon (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Hilgardia 36: 391-431.
Westigard, P.H. and R.W. Zwick. 1972. The pear psylla in Oregon. Oregon State University, Agricultural
Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 122, Corvallis, Oregon.
Westigard, P.H., L.G. Gentner and D.W. Berry. 1968. Present status of biological control of the pear
psylla in southern Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology 61:740-743.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
109
Douglas-fir beetle lipid levels in relation
to tree physical characteristics
KEVIN J. DODDS!” and DARRELL W. ROSS!
ABSTRACT
The relationship of Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, brood
adult lipid levels and position of development along infested tree boles was investigated.
In addition, the effects of phloem and bark thickness on brood adult lipid levels were
also tested. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in brood adult lipid levels
in relation to bole position, phloem thickness, or bark thickness found in this study.
Numbers of attacks, larval mines, brood adults, and parasitoid cocoons did not differ
significantly by tree bole position. Results from this study suggest Douglas-fir beetle
does not benefit, in the form of increased lipid levels, from oviposition at different bole
positions.
Key Words: Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, lipids, phloem thickness, optimal habitat
INTRODUCTION
Bark beetles are economically impor-
tant insects and knowledge of factors that
affect their flight and dispersal behavior
could be useful for improving existing
management techniques or developing new
ones. Within a population beetles display
varying degrees of flight capabilities from
extended flight periods to those incapable
of flight (Atkins 1966; Jactel 1993). This
variation in flight capability can be related
to a beetle’s physiological state.
Lipids are a source of energy for insect
flight (Canavosa et al. 2001) and have
been correlated with flight capabilities in
bark beetles (Atkins 1966; Slansky and
Haack 1986; Jactel 1993). Atkins (1966)
found that Douglas-fir beetle (DFB), Den-
droctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, with
high lipid levels were least likely to re-
spond to pheromones and hence disperse,
while beetles with low lipid levels re-
sponded immediately to pheromones.
Bennett and Borden (1971) found that a 90
minute flight was required before DFB
responded to pheromones, suggesting the
need to metabolize lipids before phero-
mone arrestment occurred (Atkins 1969).
Relationships between lipid levels and
responsiveness to host chemicals, phero-
mone arrestment, or dispersal behavior
have been found in other bark beetle spe-
cies as well (Hagen and Atkins 1975; Hed-
den and Billings 1977; Wallin and Raffa
2000). Because of their association with
bark beetle dispersal potential, a better
understanding of factors that influence
lipid levels 1s important for understanding
population movements.
Bark beetle lipid levels are influenced
by temperature (Atkins 1967), attack den-
sity (Atkins 1975; Botterweg 1983; Ander-
brandt et al. 1985), mycangial fungi
(Coppedge eft al. 1995) and phloem thick-
ness (Slansky and Haack 1986). However,
with the exception of Ips calligraphus
(Germar) (Slansky and Haack 1986), it 1s
unknown whether host tree characteristics
affect lipid levels in bark beetle brood
adults. Nutrient levels (N, P, Mg, Fe, Zn)
vary by bole height on Douglas-fir, Pseu-
dotsuga menziesii (Muirb.) Franco, tree
boles and could influence patterns of insect
colonization (Schowalter and Morrell
2002). In several Dendroctonus species,
' Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
* Current address: Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids, MN 55744
110 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
initial attacks occur at or near mid-bole
(Miller and Keen 1960; Fargo ef al. 1978;
Safranyik et al. 1992) possibly due to
phloem nutrients at these heights. Conse-
quently, brood developing at mid-bole
could have higher lipid levels than brood
developing elsewhere along the tree bole.
Other factors, such as parasitism or
predation rates, could influence coloniza-
tion behavior. Studies investigating the
relationship between parasitoid density and
tree height have produced mixed results.
Several studies found relationships be-
tween parasitoid density and height on tree
boles (Ryan and Rudinsky 1962; Mills
1986; Wermelinger 2002), while others
have not (Gargiullo and Berisford 1981).
Our objectives were to determine if
DFB brood development position along the
length of tree boles and bark and phloem
thickness affected lipid levels in brood
adults and to determine the influence of
bole position on attack density, larval
mines, brood adults, and parasitoids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tree Sampling. On 27 to 29 April,
2002, prior to the DFB flight period, nine
Douglas-fir trees infested the previous year
were felled and sampled from a small
stand (< 1 ha) of pure Douglas-fir in the
Rock Creek Area (N 46° 34.619’ W 113°
40.067’), 60 km southeast of Missoula,
MT. The sample trees ranged in diameter
from 40.2 to 71.6 cm. An additional six
trees were felled and sampled from one
Douglas-fir stand on the Flathead National
Forest (N 46° 25.316; W 114° 37.995) near
Whitefish, MT on 6 April, 2003. How-
ever, because DFB attacks were only suc-
cessful on small portions of the tree boles,
only two of the six additional trees (41.1
and 53.3 cm diameter breast height) were
suitable for use in this study. Pheromone
baiting live trees prior to DFB flight was
considered, but concerns over initiating
large infestations on federal lands and the
unnatural selection of host trees necessi-
tated avoidance of this method. All sample
trees in this study were naturally selected
and colonized by DFB.
The portion of each tree bole infested
by DFB was distinguished by the presence
of successful egg galleries and brood
adults. Total length of infested tree boles
and dbh were recorded. Infested tree bole
lengths ranged from 6.7 to 14.6 m(X = 9.7
m, SE + 0.8). Bark samples were collected
at three positions along the infested tree
bole: 2 m up from the bottom of the infes-
tation, the mid-point of the infested tree
bole, and 2 m down from the top of the
infestation.
Four bark samples were collected from
each bole position. Bark samples were
taken randomly around the circumference
of each tree. A 100-cm? hole saw attached
to a power drill was used to remove bark
samples from the infested tree. Bark sam-
ples were removed and placed individually
in labeled plastic bags. Samples were
transported to the laboratory on ice and
stored in a freezer at -10 °C until proc-
essed. Phloem thickness was measured on
a subsample of bark samples before and
after freezing. No differences in the aver-
age phloem thicknesses before and after
freezing were found (KJD, unpublished
data).
Bark Analysis. Brood adults were re-
moved from bark samples and placed indi-
vidually in numbered 7 ml glass vials with
caps attached. Numbers of DFB entrance
holes, larval mines, parasitoid cocoons,
and bark and phloem thickness were re-
corded for each bark sample. Bark thick-
ness was measured on four locations
around each bark sample, while phloem
thickness was measured in two locations.
To account for bark thickness variability,
the minimum and maximum thicknesses
on each sample were recorded along with
two random measurements.
Lipid Analysis. Beetles (n = 283 from
2002, 73 from 2003) removed from bark
samples were placed in an oven to dry at
70 °C for 48 h then weighed. To deter-
mine the lipid levels of individual beetles,
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
petroleum ether was used to remove lipids
with methods modified from Langor ef al.
(1990). Briefly, 5 ml of petroleum ether
was added to each vial, the vial was
capped, and then placed in a drying oven at
50 °C for 24 h. Petroleum ether was re-
moved and replaced with fresh solvent
every 24 h for a total of 72 h. After the
extraction was complete, beetles were oven
dried for 48 h and reweighed. To ensure
all lipids were extracted, dried beetles were
again placed in petroleum ether for 24 h,
oven dried for 48 h, and reweighed. Be-
cause there was no change in their ex-
tracted weights, it was assumed all extract-
able lipids were removed from the beetles
during the initial 72-h process. Lipid lev-
els were calculated as percent loss in dry
weight. Beetles that had 0% lipid levels
were assumed dead at the time of sampling
and discarded from the study.
Gender of each DFB brood adult was
determined (Jantz and Johnsey 1964). In
addition, pronotal width of each beetle was
measured using microcalipers and a dis-
secting microscope.
Statistical Analysis. Analyses of vari-
ance (PROC MIXED, SAS 8.0) were con-
[Tt
ducted with trees as blocks and bark and
beetle samples grouped by bole position to
test for differences in bark and phloem
thickness, numbers of entrance holes,
brood adults, parasitoid cocoons, and lar-
val galleries by height. Residual and nor-
mality plots were visually interpreted for
homogenous variances and_ normality.
Where necessary, data were log trans-
formed to meet ANOVA assumptions of
normality or variability. Means were com-
pared and separated using Tukey pairwise
comparisons. Regression analysis was
used to determine if there was a relation-
ship between the average lipid levels and
number of brood adults found in each bark
sample. In addition, relationships between
bark and phloem thickness, and lipid levels
and pronotal widths were analyzed using
analysis of covariance. Analysis of covari-
ance was also used to investigate the rela-
tionship between parasitoid abundance and
bark thickness. Differences in lipid levels
and pronotal width by gender were as-
sessed using ANOVA. All reported means
and confidence limits were backtrans-
formed from data used in the statistical
analyses.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences
between brood adult lipid levels and bole
position (Fx. = 0.75, P = 0.48). Overall
lipid levels ranged from 3.12% to 43.08%
and averaged 21.3 (95% CL = 17.8-25.5),
23.6 (19.5-28.2), and 21.8 (18.0-26.3) for
the bottom, middle, and top position re-
spectively. Less than 26% of beetles from
both sample years had < 15% lipid levels
(Figure 1). The largest number of beetles
from all three bole positions had between
25-35% lipids, while very few had < 5%
lipids (Figure 2). Analysis of covariance
indicated there was no significant relation-
ship between phloem thickness (F2. 29=
0.87, P = 0.43) or bark thickness (F) 29=
0.73, P = 0.49) and lipid levels. Phloem
thickness ranged from 1.5 mm to 4.9 mm,
while bark thickness ranged from 7.5 mm
to 32.6 mm. There were no significant
relationships between pronotal width and
bole position (F2 .»= 2.02, P = 0.16),
phloem thickness (Fz .= 1.89, P = 0.18),
or bark thickness (F>. 29= 0.34, P = 0.72).
Phloem thickness, numbers of entrance
holes, larval mines, brood adults, and para-
sitoid cocoons were not significantly dif-
ferent among the three bole positions
(Table 1). However, bark thickness was
significantly different among the three
heights (F, »= 32.74, P < 0.0001). Bark at
the bottom was thicker than the middle (tz
= 4.95, P = 0.0002) and top (tx) = 8.02, P<
0.0001) of tree boles, while the middle was
also thicker than the top (tx) = 3.07, P =
0.02). There was no significant relation-
ship between lipid levels and number of
brood adults in bark samples (Fj j;05= 1.44,
P = 0.23). Analysis of covariance indi-
cated there was no relationship between
112 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
a)
sd
D
ao 15
a
Oo
e
Oo
Lr
6 10
o:
Oo
}
Oo
0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45
Lipid Levels (%)
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the proportion of Douglas-fir beetle brood adults by lipid
levels (%) in 2002 (n = 283) and 2003 (n = 73).
# of Beetles
0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45
Lipid Levels (%)
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of Douglas-fir beetle brood adult lipid levels (%) by bole
position. n= 356.
number of parasitoids and bark thickness 28.2%) than in male (23.0%, CL = 20.1%,
(Fz 2= 0.92, P= 0.42). 26.0%) DFB (F;.322 = 6.88, P = 0.009).
Overall, the gender of brood adults was There was no difference in pronotal width
55% female and 45% male. Average between male and female DFB (Fj,313 =
brood adult lipid levels were significantly 0.16, P= 0.70).
higher in female (25.3%, CL = 22.4%,
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 113
Table 1.
Mean (95% CL) bark and phloem thickness and Douglas-fir beetle and parasitoid population
parameters from 100-cm” bark samples taken at three bole positions. Means followed by the
same letter are non-significant as determined by Tukey’s pairwise comparisons (a = 0.05).
Eleven trees were sampled, with a total of n = 44 bark samples taken from each of the three
bole position.
Bole Position
Variable Bottom Middle Top P-value
Bark (mm) 16.28 (13.87-18.91)a 13.74 (11.82-16.12)b 12.43 (10.69-14.44)c <.0001
Phloem (mm) 3.49 (3.22-3.82) 3.39 (3.1-3.71) 3.39 (3.1-3.71) 0.54
No. entrance holes _0.73 (0.55-0.92) 0.91 (0.72-1.09) 0.8 (0.62-0.98) 0.40
No. brood adults 3.49 (2.56-4.81) 2.64 (1.95-3.6) 2.77 (2.03-3.78) 0.29
Ne ate 1.36 (1.08-1.7) 1.32 (1.06-1.65) 1.58 (1.27-1.97) 0.41
cocoons
No. larval galleries 24.95 (17.31-32.6)
31.14 (23.49-38.78)
2/36 (19.72-35.01) 0.11
DISCUSSION
Intraspecific competition has been cor-
related with lipid levels in DFB and other
bark beetle species, (Atkins 1975; Botter-
weg 1983; Anderbrant et a/. 1985), and
must be considered when evaluating fac-
tors that influence brood adult lipid levels.
Because entrance holes, larval mines, and
brood adult densities were equal at the
three bole positions, it was assumed devel-
oping brood encountered similar intras-
pecific competition levels at each position.
Therefore, intraspecific competition should
not have influenced lipid levels in this
study.
Lipid level was not influenced by bole
position or phloem thickness in this study.
However, unmeasured factors such as
phloem quality (e.g., nutrient level), gut
flora, genetics, or length of feeding could
also influence lipid levels. Ayres et al.
(2000) found a positive relationship be-
tween Dendroctonus frontalis
Zimmermann size and phloem nitrogen
levels of infested trees, demonstrating that
phloem qualitative characters determine
fitness attributes of phloem-feeding in-
sects. Phloem nutritional levels at the three
bole positions were not sampled in this
study because sampled trees were already
colonized and extensively fed upon by
bark beetle brood and associated insects
(e.g., Cerambycidae and Buprestidae) at
the time of sampling.
There was no relationship between bark
thickness and lipid content of DFB. Bark
thickness imparts some level of insulation
on host tree phloem (Graham 1924; Beal
1934; Powell 1967) and influences bark
beetle brood survival during cold periods
(Miller and Keen 1960). Consequently,
bark thickness may have influenced lipid
levels in this study, but differences may
have been undetected due to the sampling
procedure. Bark samples were not parti-
tioned by cardinal direction, thus aspect-
related differences in lipid levels could not
be analyzed.
Female brood adults had higher lipid
levels than males in sample trees, while
pronotal widths were equal between the
sexes. In Dendroctonus species, females
locate and initiate colonization of host
trees. This supports the hypothesis that
higher energy levels benefit dispersing
females that must locate, colonize, and
release aggregation pheromones that attract
conspecifics to overwhelm host tree de-
fenses. Similarly, Anderbrant ef a/. (1985)
114 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
found higher lipid levels in male /ps typog-
raphus (L.) and attributed this to males
being the colonizing sex, and therefore
benefiting from increased energy reserves.
Atkins (1966) determined that DFB
adults with lipid levels of less than 10%
were unlikely to fly, those with 11-20%
lipid content can fly and respond to phero-
mones, and brood adults with over 20%
lipid content disperse but are less likely to
respond to pheromones. In the current
study, the majority of beetles from both
sample years had > 20% lipids (Figure 1).
Based on Atkins (1966) data for potential
to disperse, 67.7% of beetles sampled in
this study, regardless of the bole position
where they developed, would be capable of
long distance dispersal.
There were no differences between
parasitoid densities at each bole position.
Although bark was significantly thinner at
the upper bole position, an attribute com-
monly associated with higher parasitism
levels, there was not a higher level of para-
sitoid abundance found there. Likely, para-
sitoids are exploiting thin bark portions or
bark crevices at all positions.
Bark beetles colonizing host trees are
affected by natural predators (Reeve 1997;
Aukema and Raffa 2002), competitors
(Schroeder and Weslien 1994; Dodds et al.
2001), and host tree defenses (Raffa and
Berryman 1983). In addition to minimiz-
ing interactions with these mortality fac-
tors, bark beetles must also locate areas
that are suitable for brood development
and reproductive success. If lipid levels
are viewed as a relative fitness measure,
there seems to be no benefit to oviposition
on different bole positions for developing
DFB brood. Consequently, it is unlikely
that the colonization behavior of attacking
the mid-bole first, is a fitness response to
seeking out and exploiting optimal habitat
for developing brood. While no relation-
ship between lipids and bole position were
found, other factors (e.g., avoidance of
predators or host tree defenses) might
make oviposition at the mid-bole benefi-
cial.
Results from this study suggest DFB
brood adult lipid levels are not influenced
by tree phloem or bark thickness. How-
ever, due to low DFB populations in the
study area, the number of infested trees
available to sample was lower than antici-
pated. Consequently, several of the re-
sponse variables measured had wide 95%
CL ranges that may have been smaller had
more trees been available to sample. If the
number of sample trees had been in-
creased, differences in lipid levels between
the three bole positions may have been
detected.
Beetles emerging from different host
trees within or between forest stands could
explain the population level variations in
brood adult lipid levels and subsequent
flight behaviors found in wild populations.
Further studies into the direct relationship
of phloem characteristics and lipid levels
may help explain landscape level dispersal
behaviors of DFB and mortality patterns
attributed to this beetle.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Ken
Gibson (USDA Forest Service, Forest
Health Protection, Missoula, MT) and Ed
Lieser (USDA Forest Service, Flathead
National Forest, Tally Lake Ranger Dis-
trict) for help locating Douglas-fir beetle
infested trees. Mike Armstrong, Missoula,
MT generously allowed access to his land
and cutting of infested trees. Rick Kelsey
(USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station) provided access to lab
equipment. Laétitia Plewinski provided lab
assistance. Kimberly F. Wallin (Oregon
State University) provided comments on
an earlier draft of this work.
REFERENCES
Anderbrant, O., F. Schlyter, and G. Birgersson. 1985. Intraspecific competition affecting parents and off-
spring in the bark beetle /ps typographus. Oikos. 45: 89-98.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 115
Atkins, M.D. 1966. Laboratory studies on the behaviour of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseu-
dotsugae Hopk. The Canadian Entomologist. 98: 953-991.
Atkins, M.D. 1967. The effect of rearing temperature on the size and fat content of the Douglas-fir bee-
tle. The Canadian Entomologist. 99: 181-187.
Atkins, M. D. 1969. Lipid loss with flight in the Douglas-fir beetle. The Canadian Entomologist 101: 164-
165.
Atkins, M.D. 1975. On factors affecting the size, fat content and behavior of a scolytid. The Canadian
Entomologist. 78: 209-218.
Aukema, B.H. and K.F. Raffa. 2002. Relative effects of exophytic predation, endophytic predation, and
intraspecific competition on a subcortical herbivore: consequences to the reproduction of /ps pini and
Thanasimus dubius. Oecologia. 133: 483-491.
Ayres, M.P., R.T. Wilkens, J.J. Ruel, M.J. Lombardero, and E. Vallery. 2000. Nitrogen budgets of
phloem-feeding bark beetles with and without symbiotic fungi. Ecology. 81: 2198-2210.
Beal, J.A. 1934. Relation of air and bark temperatures of infested ponderosa pines during subzero
weather. Journal of Economic Entomology. 27:1132-1139.
Bennett, R.B. and J.H. Borden. 1971. Flight arrestment of tethered Dendroctonus pseutotsugae and Try-
podendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to olfactory stimuli. Annals of the Entomo-
logical Society of America. 64: 1273-1286.
Botterweg, P.F. 1983. The effect of attack density on size, fat content and emergence of the spruce bark
beetle Ips typographus L. Journal of Applied Entomology. 96: 47-55.
Canavoso, L.E., Z.E. Jouni, K.J. Karnas, J.E. Pennington, and M.E. Wells. 2001. Fat metabolism in in-
sects. Annual Review of Nutrition. 21: 23-46.
Coppedge, B.R., F.M. Stephen, and G.W. Felton. 1995. Variation in female southern pine beetle size and
lipid content in relation to fungal associates. The Canadian Entomologist. 127: 145-154.
Dodds, K.J., C. Graber, and F.M. Stephen. 2001. Facultative intraguild predation by larval Cerambycidae
(Coleoptera) on bark beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology. 30: 17-22.
Fargo, W.S., R.N. Coulson, P.E. Pulley, D.N. Pope, and C.L. Kelley. 1978. Spatial and temporal patterns
of within-tree colonization by Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Ento-
mologist. 110: 1213-1232.
Gargiullo, P.M. and C.W. Berisford. 1981. Effects of host density and bark thickness on the densities of
parasites of the southern pine beetle. Environmental Entomology. 10: 392-399.
Graham, S.A. 1924. Temperature as a limiting factor in the life of subcortical insects. Journal of Eco-
nomic Entomology. 17: 377-383.
Hagen, B. W. and M. D. Atkins 1975. Between generation variability in the fat content and behavior of
Ips paraconfusus Lanier. Zeitschrift fiir angewandte Entomologie. 79: 169-172.
Hedden, R.L. and R.F. Billings. 1977. Seasonal variation in fat content and size of the southern pine
beetle in east Texas. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 70: 876-880.
Jactel, H. 1993. Individual variability of the flight potential of Ips sexdentatus Boern. (Coleoptera: Scoly-
tidae) in relation to day of emergence, sex, size, and lipid content. The Canadian Entomologist. 125:
919-930.
Jantz, O.K. and R.L. Johnsey. 1964. Determination of sex of the Douglas-fir beetle Dendroctonus pseu-
dotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist. 96: 1327-1329.
Langor, D.W., J.R. Spence, and G.R. Pohl. 1990. Host effects on fertility and reproductive success of
Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Evolution. 44: 609-618.
Miller, J.M. and F.P. Keen, 1960. Biology and control of the western pine beetle. USDA Forest Service
Miscellaneous Publication 800. 381 pp.
Mills, N.J. 1986. A preliminary analysis of the dynamics of within tree populations of Jps typographus
(L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 102: 402-416.
Powell, J.M. 1967. A study of habitat temperatures of bark beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins in
lodgepole pine. Agricultural Meteorology. 4: 189-201.
Raffa, K.F. and A.A. Berryman. 1983. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and
ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Monographs. 53: 27-49.
Reeve, J.D. 1997. Predation and bark beetle dynamics. Oecologia. 112: 48-54.
Ryan, R.B. and J.A. Rudinsky. 1962. Biology and habits of the Douglas-fir beetle parasite, Coeloides
brunneri Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), in western Oregon. The Canadian Entomologist. 94: 748-
763.
Safranyik, L., D.A. Linton, R. Silversides, and L.H. McMullen. 1992. Dispersal of released mountain
pine beetles under the canopy of a mature lodgepole pine stand. Journal of Applied Entomology.
113: 441-450.
Slansky, F. Jr. and R.A. Haack. 1986. Age-specific flight behaviour in relation to body weight and lipid
116 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
content of /ps calligraphus reared in slash pine bolts with thick or thin inner bark (phloem). Ento-
mologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 40: 197-207.
Schowalter, T.D. and J.J. Morrell. 2002. Nutritional quality of Douglas-fir wood: effect of vertical and
horizontal position on nutrient levels. Wood and Fiber Science. 34: 158-164.
Schroeder, L.M. and J. Weslien. 1994. Interactions between the phloem-feeding Tomicus piniperda
(Col.: Scolytidae) and Acanthocinus aedilis (Col.: Cerambycidae), and the predator Thanasimus for-
micarius (Col.: Cleridae) with special reference to brood production. Entomophaga. 39: 149-157.
Wallin, K. F. and K. F. Raffa. 2000. Influences of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple
steps of postlanding host acceptance behavior of /ps pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental
Entomology 29: 442-453.
Wermelinger, B. 2002. Development and distribution of predators and parasitoids during two consecu-
tive years of Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) infestation. Journal of Applied Entomology. 126:
521-527.
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Evaluation of two repellent semiochemicals for disruption of
attack by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus
ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
JOHN H. BORDEN’”, DEEPA S. PURESWARAN’”
and LISA M. POIRIER‘
ABSTRACT
When released from attractant-baited multiple-funnel traps, 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-
one (MCH) reduced catches of male and female mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus
ponderosae Hopkins, by 67.4% and 71.8%, respectively. 2-Phenyl ethanol reduced the
respective catches by 96.6% and 95.1%, but only verbenone and all three compounds
together reduced catches to levels no different from those in unbaited control traps. In
another experiment, all three binary combinations of the above compounds, plus the
ternary combination, reduced catches of both sexes by >96%. In comparable tree protec-
tion experiments near Princeton BC, MCH and 2-pheny! ethanol alone and together
significantly reduced the percentages of pheromone-baited lodgepole pines that were
attacked by 16.0%, 33.3% and 40.0%, respectively, but verbenone alone totally pro-
tected baited trees, and many trees within 5 m of them, from attack. In identical experi-
ments near Prince George BC, where mountain pine beetle populations were much
higher, adding MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol or both together to verbenone did not cause at-
tack to be reduced significantly beyond that achieved by verbenone alone. Our results
confirm that 2-phenyl ethanol 1s an antiaggregation pheromone for the mountain pine
beetle, and that MCH 1s an interspecific synomone. However, because neither was as
effective as verbenone in protecting pheromone-baited trees from attack, and adding
either or both to verbenone did not improve protection, neither compound warrants fur-
ther consideration as a potential tool for operational disruption of attack.
Key Words: Dendroctonus ponderosae, semiochemicals, pheromones, verbenone, 2-
phenyl ethanol, 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one, attack disruption
INTRODUCTION
Although the antiaggregation phero-
mone verbenone has long been known to
disrupt attack by the mountain pine beetle
(MPB), Dendroctonus ponderosae Hop-
kins (Amman ef a/. 1989; Lindgren et al.
1989a), its efficacy has been inconsistent
between years, target species of trees, and
geographic areas (Bentz et al. 1989; Lister
et al. 1990; Gibson et al. 1991; Shea et al.
1992). Part of the reason for variable effi-
cacy may be that verbenone is transformed
to the inactive compound chrysanthenone
when exposed to ultraviolet radiation
(Kostyk et al. 1993). Adding repellent non-
host volatiles from angiosperm tree bark to
verbenone has been shown to increase the
efficacy of protecting lodgepole pines,
Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelmann,
from attack (Huber and Borden 2001), and
combining a seven-component nonhost
'Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC V5A
1S6
* Current address: Phero Tech Inc., 7572 Progress Way, Delta BC V4G 1E9
* Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755 USA
“Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern BC, 3333 University Way, Prince George
BC V2N 4Z9
118 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
volatile blend with an increased release
rate of verbenone has raised the efficacy
even higher (Borden ef al. 2003). How-
ever, at an effective 10 x 10 m spacing, the
latter treatment would cost $1,250 per ha,
excluding labor, limiting its potential use.
One means of reducing the cost would
be to replace the repellent nonhost volatile
blend with cheaper materials. Two such
semiochemicals are the antiaggregation
pheromone 2-phenyl ethanol (Pureswaran
et al. 2000) and 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-
one (MCH). MCH is an antiaggregation
pheromone of Douglas-fir and spruce bee-
tles, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins
and D. rufipennis (Kirby), respectively
(Rudinsky ef a/. 1972; Lindgren ef al.
1989b) that was recently shown to be a
repellent synomone for the mountain pine
beetle (Pureswaran and Borden 2004). Our
objectives were to confirm the bioactivity
of 2-phenyl ethanol and MCH, and to de-
termine in trapping and tree protection
experiments whether they are potential
adjuvants that could increase the efficacy
of verbenone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two randomized complete block, 12-
replicate, field trapping experiments (Exp.
1 and 2) were set up on 31 July and 13
August 2002, respectively, near the East
Gate of Manning Park BC (49° 19' N, 120°
35' W). Tree protection experiments (Exp.
3A and 4A) with treatments identical to
those in the trapping experiments were set
up on 5-7 July 2002 in the valley of Whip-
saw Creek near Princeton BC (49° 9' N,
120° 41' W), and two additional identical
experiments (Exp. 3B and 4B) were set up
on 24-27 July 2002 on the 1400 Road
south of Prince George BC (53° 21' N,
123° 10' W).
For trapping experiments, 12-unit mul-
tiple-funnel traps were deployed at least 15
m apart along logging roads that passed
near infested stands. For the tree protection
experiments, lodgepole pines with a mini-
mum diameter at breast height (dbh = 1.3
m) of 20 cm were selected at least 25 m
apart in rows at least 50 m apart through
cut blocks designated for harvest in the fall
of 2002.
Treatments (Tables 1, 2) in Exp. 1, 3A
and 3B were an unbaited trap or tree
(negative control), and an attractive bait
alone (positive control) or with MCH, 2-
phenyl ethanol, verbenone, or all three
together. In Exp. 2, 4A and 4B, the control
treatments were the same, but the three
disruptants were deployed in all three pos-
sible binary blends and the ternary blend.
All semiochemicals and release devices
were purchased from Phero Tech Inc.,
Delta BC. The attractive trap bait consisted
of the host kairomone myrcene released
from a 20 mL polyethylene bottle at 95
mg/24 h, determined at 23 °C, and the ag-
gregation pheromones 82% _ (-)-trans-
verbenol and (+)-exo-brevicomin respec-
tively released from bubble caps and poly-
urethane flexlures at 1.2 and 0.3 mg/24 h,
determined at 20 °C. The attractive tree
bait was identical to the trap bait, but with
myrcene deleted (Borden ef al. 1993).
MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol and 80% (-)-
verbenone were released from bubble caps
at 4.0, 4.2 and 1.8 mg/24 h, determined at
20, 25, and 20 °C, respectively. Devices
were hung in the central funnel of traps
and affixed to the north face of trees at
maximum reach from the ground. The dbh
of all baited trees was measured, and var-
ied among experiments (mean + SE) as
follows: 30.9 + 1.3 cm to 35.1 + 1.2 cm in
Exp. 3A and 4A near Princeton, and 23.0 +
0.5 cm to 25.3 + 0.9 cm in Exp. 3B and 4B
near Prince George.
Captured beetles in Exp. 1 and 2 were
collected on 13 and 26 August, respec-
tively. Beetles were held at ca. -5 °C in
plastic bags until sexed and counted.
Tree protection experiments were
evaluated on 25-27 September (Exp. 3B
and 4B) and 3-4 October (Exp. 3A and
4A). The attack density was counted at eye
level in two 20 x 40 cm panels on the east
and west faces of baited trees and all trees
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
119
Table 1.
Effect of MCH, 2 phenyl ethanol and verbenone alone or in binary or ternary combinations, on
catches of mountain pine beetles in attractant-baited multiple-funnel traps. Eastgate Road near
Manning Park, B.C., 31 July — 13 August 2002 for Experiment 1 and 13 — 26 August for Ex-
periment 2.
Mean number of beetles captured (SE)
Exp. No. Treatment’ INORG (9S) Gace ee
Males Females
] MPB bait 12 137.8+47.4a 86.5+ 38.8 a
Bait + MCH 12 449+8.9b 24.4+8.2b
Bait + 2 PE 12 4.7+1.1¢ 4.341.2c
Bait + V 12 3.54 1.2 cd 2.3215 ed
Bait + V + MCH + 2PE 12 1.8+0.5 cd 11+0.8d
Unbaited 12 0.8+0.4d 0.8+0.3d
2 MPB bait 12 76.1429.8a 41.3+16.0a
Bait + MCH + 2PE 10 1.7+0.7b 1.6+0.7b
Bait + V + MCH 12 222 15D 1.1+40.6b
Bait + V + 2PE 12 0520.25 0.2+0.2b
Bait + V +MCH + 2PE 12 0.4+0.2b 0.6+0.2b
Unbaited 12 0.1+0.1b 0.3+0.1b
Treatments as follows: MPB bait = mountain pine beetle bait including trans-verbenol, exo-
brevicomin and myrcene; MCH= 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-l-one; 2PE= 2-phenyl ethanol;
V=verbonene.
*Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, REGW test, P<0.05
ANOVA results: Exp. 1., males, F=53.87, df=5,66, P<0.0001; Exp. 1, females, F=34.89,
df=5,66, P<0.0001; Exp. 2, males, F=14.45, df=16,52, P<0.0001; Exp. 2, females, F=9.84,
df=16,52, P<0.0001.
with at least five attacks in the total 0.16
m’ area (31.25/m’) were classed as mass-
attacked. All surrounding lodgepole pines
at least 17.5 cm dbh within 5 m of baited
trees were evaluated as unattacked, at-
tacked, or mass-attacked, the latter being
determined qualitatively by visual estima-
tion of attack density and copious amounts
of frass in bark crevices and around the
root collar.
Data for numbers of beetles captured
and attack density on baited trees were log-
transformed and analyzed by ANOVA and
the REGW test (Day and Quinn 1989).
Data on proportions of baited and sur-
rounding trees that were mass-attacked
were analyzed by chi-square tests for com-
parison between multiple proportions
(Jones 1984). In all cases a = 0.05.
RESULTS
In the first trapping experiment (Exp.
1), MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol and verbenone
reduced the catches of male and female
mountain pine beetles in attractant-baited
traps by 67.4%, 71.8% and 96.6%, and
95.1%, and 97.5% and 97.3%, respec-
tively, relative to catches in baited control
traps (Table 1). 2-Phenyl ethanol reduced
catches to levels no different from those
achieved by verbenone (both sexes) or the
ternary blend (males only), but only the
latter two treatments resulted in catches not
significantly different from those in un-
baited control traps. In Exp. 2, all binary
120 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Table 2.
Effect of treatment with MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol and verbenone alone, or in binary or ternary
combinations, on ranked percentages of pheromone-baited lodgepole pines that were mass-
attacked, and on the pooled percentages of all surrounding trees > 17.5 cm dbh within 5 m of
the baited tree that were mass-attacked.
Bey io: | | Percent Surrounding trees
(roses) Location Treatment baited trees we Percent
mass-attacked mass-attacked”
3A (25) Princeton MPB bait 100.00 a 103 15.5 ab
Bait + MCH 84.0 b 119 23.5a
Bait + 2PE 66.7 b 104 4.8b
Bait +V + MCH + 2PE 0.0c 29, 0.0 c
Unbaited 0.0c 100 0.0c
Bait + V 0.0c 117 0.0c
3B(20) ‘Prince George MPB bait 95.0 a 69 47.8 ab
Bait + MCH 80.0 ab 83 31.3 ab
Bait + 2PE 75.0 abc 62 24.2b
Unbaited 40.0 be 65 49.2a
Bait +V + MCH + 2PE 40.0 be 75 18.7b
Bait + V 35.0¢ 70 27.1 ab
4A (20) Princeton MPB bait 100.0 a 96 26.0 a
Bait + MCH + 2PE 60.0 b 93 IS5.la
Bait + V + MCH 53°C 87 1.1 b
Bait + V + 2PE 0.0 c 89 0.0 b
Unbaited 0.0c 103 0.0 b
Bait + V + MCH + 2PE 0.0c 105 0.0b
4B (17) _ Prince George MPB bait 94.1 a a2 44.2a
Bait + V + MCH + 2PE 47.1b 47 25:5 ab
Bait + V + 2PE 35.3 b 61 23.0 ab
Unbaited 29.4b 67 17.9b
Bait + MCH + 2PE 2aa'D 52 36.5 ab
Bait + V +MCH 17.6b 51 25.5 ab
' Treatments as in Table 1, Footnote 1, except that myrcene is not present in MPB bait.
* Percents within a column and experiment followed the same letter are not significantly differ-
ent, chi-square test for multiple proportions, P<0.05.
combinations and the ternary combination
of disruptants reduced catches by more
than 96%, and in all cases catches in traps
with disruptive treatments were no greater
than in unbaited control traps.
In the first tree protection experiment
near Princeton (Exp. 3A), all pheromone-
baited control trees were mass-attacked
(Table 2). MCH and 2-phenyl ethanol
alone reduced the proportion of baited
trees that were mass-attacked by 16.0%
and 33.3%, respectively, but verbenone
and the ternary blend completely protected
pheromone-baited trees and all trees within
5 m of them from attack. In Exp. 3B near
Prince George, only verbenone and the
ternary blend significantly reduced the
percentage of baited trees that were mass-
attacked, and the lowest percentages of
surrounding trees that were mass-attacked
occurred in the 2-phenyl ethanol and ter-
nary blend treatments.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
In the second tree protection experi-
ment near Princeton (Exp. 4A), the binary
combination of MCH and 2-phenyl ethanol
reduced the percentage of baited trees that
were mass-attacked by 40%, but did not
cause a reduction in the proportion of sur-
rounding trees that were mass-attacked
(Table 2). All treatments containing verbe-
none reduced attack to zero or to a level
not significantly different from zero. In
Exp. 4B near Prince George, all treatments
significantly and equally reduced the per-
centage of baited trees that were mass-
attacked, but no treatment had a significant
effect on attack on surrounding trees.
In all cases except Exp. 3B (Bait + V +
MCH + 2 PE), disruptant treatments in-
cluding verbenone caused a reduction in
attack density on mass-attacked trees rela-
tive to the MPB bait alone, but in the ab-
sence of verbenone, only MCH + 2-pheny]
ethanol in Exp. 4B caused a similar reduc-
tion (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effect of treatment with MCH, 2-pheny] ethanol and verbenone alone, or in binary or ternary
combinations, on ranked densities of attack by the mountain pine beetle on pheromone-baited
lodgepole pines.
Beaune, | No. pcan attack density/
(fo repo) Location Treatment attacked m°+SEon attacked
trees trees
3A (25) Princeton MPB bait 25 125.5+10.la
Bait + 2PE 16 112.5413.8a
Bait + MCH 23 108.14+7.6a
Bait + V +MCH + 2PE 3 6.3+0.0b
Bait + V 0 no attack
Unbaited 0 no attack
3B (20) Prince George Bait + MCH 15 105.4+10.5a
MPB bait 19 91.44 8.5 ab
Bait + 2PE 14 77.3 + 10.4 ab
Unbaited 10 62.5 + 13.8 be
Bait + V + MCH + 2PE 8 60.9 + 7.6 be
Bait + V 13 52.9+10.2¢
4A (20) Princeton MPB bait 20 129.1+84a
Bait + MCH + 2PE 14 98.74 148a
Bait + V + MCH 6 25.04 11.9b
Bait + V+ 2PE 5 8.8+4.3b
Bait + V + MCH + 2PE 6 8.3+3.5b
Unbaited l no attack
4B (17) Prince George MPB bait hes 116.349.1a
Bait + V +MCH + 2PE 1) 64.2 + 40.1 b
Bait + V + 2PE 9 58.3411.3b
Unbaited 9 43.8+10.8b
Bait + MCH + 2PE 12 40.6 + 13.9b
Bait + V +MCH fi 40.2 + 14.8 b
' Treatments as in Table 1, Footnote 1, except that myrcene was not present in MPB baits.
* Percents within a column and experiment followed the same letter are not significantly differ-
ent, chi-square test for multiple proportions, P<0.05.
122 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
DISCUSSION
Our results confirm the bioactivity of 2-
phenyl ethanol as an antiaggregation
pheromone of the mountain pine beetle
(Pureswaran et a/. 2000), and MCH as a
repellant synomone (Pureswaran and Bor-
den 2004).
Unlike MCH, 2-phenyl ethanol ap-
peared to have some potential as a pest
management tool. MCH caused only mar-
ginal reductions in trap catches, and af-
forded little protection of trees. In contrast,
2-phenyl ethanol caused large reductions
in trap catches and greater protection of
pheromone-baited and surrounding trees.
In Exp. 1, 2, 3A and 3B in the southern
part of the province, verbenone was so
effective alone that there was no opportu-
nity to observe any potential interaction
between MCH, 2-pheny! ethanol and ver-
benone. However, near Prince George,
where beetle pressure was much higher
than near Princeton, adding MCH, 2-
phenyl ethanol or both together to verbe-
none did not cause any greater protection
of pheromone-baited or surrounding trees
than was achieved by verbenone alone. In
a similar experiment nonhost volatiles
added to verbenone resulted in substan-
tially greater protection of baited and sur-
rounding trees than was found with verbe-
none alone (Huber and Borden 2001).
However, in a small plot experiment the
same nonhost volatile blend caused a
greater reduction of attack than verbenone
alone when added to high-dose verbenone
pouches, but not when added to the same
low-dose bubble caps used in our experi-
ments (Borden et a/. 2003).
Our results show that when tested
alone, 2-phenyl ethanol was more effective
than MCH in reducing catches in attrac-
tant-baited traps (Table 1), as well as the
percentage of baited and surrounding trees
that were mass-attacked (Table 2, Exp.
3A). However, neither MCH nor 2-phenyl
ethanol alone reduced the attack density of
trees that were mass-attacked (Table 3),
and there was no apparent additive or syn-
ergistic effect of combining the two com-
pounds or of adding them alone or together
to verbenone to protect trees from attack.
Therefore, we conclude that neither com-
pound has compelling potential for use as
an adjuvant to verbenone in operational
attack disruption programs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank L.J. Chong, P. Dodds and M.
Poirier for assistance and Weyerhaeuser
Canada Ltd. and Canadian Forest Products
Ltd. for access to field sites. This research
was supported by the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council, BC For-
estry Innovation Investment and the fol-
lowing industrial sponsors: Abitibi Con-
solidated Inc., B.C. Hydro and Power Au-
thority, Bugbusters Pest Management Ltd.,
Canadian Forest Products Ltd., Gorman
Bros. Ltd., International Forest Products
Ltd., Lignum Ltd., Manning Diversified
Forest Products Ltd., Millar-Western For-
est Products Ltd., Phero Tech Inc., River-
side Forest Products Ltd., Slocan Forest
Products Ltd., Tembec Forest Industries
Ltd., TimberWest Forest Ltd., Tolko In-
dustries Ltd., Weldwood of Canada Ltd.,
West Fraser Mills Ltd., Western Forest
Products Ltd., and Weyerhaeuser Canada
Ltd.
REFERENCES
Amman, G.D., R. W. Their, M.D. McGregor and R.F. Schmitz. 1989. Efficacy of verbenone in reducing
lodgepole pine infestation by mountain pine beetles in Idaho. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19:
60-64.
Bentz, B., C.K. Lister, JM. Schmid, S.A. Mata, L.A. Rasmussen and D. Haneman. 1989. Does verbenone
reduce mountain pine beetle attacks in susceptible stands of ponderosa pine? United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Note RM-495.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 123
Borden, J.H., L.J. Chong, B.S. Lindgren, E.J. Begin, T.M. Ebata, L.E. Maclauchlan and R.S. Hodgkinson.
1993. A simplified tree bait for the mountain pine beetle. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 23:
1108-1113.
Borden, J.H., L.J. Chong, T.J. Earle and D.P.W. Huber. 2003. Protection of lodgepole pine from attack by
the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) using high doses of
verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles. The Forestry Chronicle 79: 685-691.
Day, R.W. and G.P. Quinn. 1989. Comparison of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Eco-
logical Monographs 59: 433-463.
Gibson, K.E., R.F. Schmitz, G.D. Amman and R.D. Oakes. 1991. Mountain pine beetle response to differ-
ent verbenone dosages in pine stands of western Montana. United States Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service Research Paper INT-444.
Huber, D.P.W. and J.H. Borden. 2001. Protection of lodgepole pine from attack by mountain pine beetle,
Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone. Entomologia Experi-
mentalis et Applicata 92: 131-141.
Jones, D. 1984. Use, misuse, and role of multiple-comparison procedures in ecological and agricultural
entomology. Environmental Entomology 13: 635-649.
Kostyk, B.C., J.H. Borden and G. Gries. 1993. Photoisomerization of antiaggregation pheromone verbe-
none: Biological and practical implications with respect to the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus
ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 1749-1759.
Lindgren, B.S., J.H. Borden, G.H. Cushon, L.J. Chong and C.J. Higgins. 1989a. Reduction of mountain
pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attack by verbenone in lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 65-68.
Lindgren, B.S., M.D. McGregor, R.D. Oakes and H.E. Meyer. 1989b. Suppression of spruce beetle attacks
by MCH released from bubble caps. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 4: 49-52.
Lister, C.K., JM. Schmid, S.A. Mata, D. Haneman, C. O’Neil, J. Pasek and L. Sower. 1990. Verbenone
bubble caps ineffective as a preventative strategy against mountain pine beetle attacks in ponderosa
pine. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Note RM-501.
Pureswaran, D.S. and J.H. Borden. 2004. New repellent semiochemicals for three species of Dendrocto-
nus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 14: 67-75.
Pureswaran, D.S., R. Gries, J.H. Borden and H.D. Pierce, Jr. 2000. Dynamics of pheromone production
and communication in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, and the pine
engraver, [ps pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 10: 153-168.
Rudinsky, J.A., M.M. Furniss, L.N. Kline, and R.F. Schmitz. 1972. Attraction and repression of Dendroc-
tonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) by three synthetic pheromones in traps in Oregon and
Idaho. The Canadian Entomologist 104: 815-822.
Shea, P.J., M.D. McGregor and G.E. Daterman. 1992. Aerial application of verbenone reduces attack by
the mountain pine beetle. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 436-441.
124 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
125
Heteroptera (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha) New to Canada.
Part 2
G.G.E. SCUDDER’
ABSTRACT
The occurrence of an additional six species of true bugs newly recognized in Canada 1s
documented. New US state records are given for two pentatomid species, and a key to
the species of Neottiglossa Kirby in Canada is included.
INTRODUCTION
In a previous paper (Scudder 2000), 34
species of true bugs newly recognized in
Canada was documented. At that time, it
was noted that additional species would be
published in Part 2, when all determina-
tions had been confirmed.
In the intervening period, additional
species have been included in publications
by Schuh (2001), Schwartz and Scudder
(2001, 2003) and Paiero et al. (2004).
I now report an additional six species
new to Canada.
Museum abbreviations used in the text
are as follows:
APM: Alberta Provincial Museum,
Edmonton, AB.
CNC: Canadian National Collection of
Insects, Agriculture and Agri-Food Can-
ada, Ottawa, ON.
LM: Lyman Entomological Museum,
Macdonald College, McGill University,
Ste.-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC.
PFC: Pacific Forestry Centre, Natural
Resources Canada, Victoria, BC.
UA: Strickland Museum, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
UBC: Spencer Entomological Museum,
Department of Zoology, University of Brit-
ish Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
SPECIES NEW TO CANADA
Family CYDNIDAE
Amnestus basidentatus Froeschner
QC: 23 29, Aylmer, lumiére, Boisé
décidu., 29.v.1989 (L. LeSage) [CNC].
This species has been swept from grass,
and occurs from New York south to Flor-
ida and Cuba, and west to Missouri and
Texas (Froeschner 1960). A key to sepa-
rate A. basidentatus from the other three
species of Amnestus Dallas that occur in
Canada (Maw et al. 2000) is provided by
McPherson (1982). A. basidentatus has
four marginal pegs on each juga, and the
male has a characteristic anterior subbasal
tooth on the front tibia, giving this segment
a notched appearance on its inner surface.
The ventral subapical spine on the hind
femur of the male is also shorter than the
width of the femur, while in the female, the
last abdominal sternum lacks a flattened
glabrous area.
Family MIRIDAE
Pinophylus carneolus (Knight)
SK: 14, Nipawin, Jack pine, 7.vi.1968
(FIS 605) [CNC].
The genus Pinophylus Schwartz &
Schuh was described by Schwartz and
Schuh (1999) with three contained species,
one of which P. ro/fsi (Knight), was re-
ported from Alberta, British Columbia and
Yukon, and south to Oregon and Colorado.
Pinophylus carneolus was reported from
District of Columbia, Maryland, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West
' Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4
126 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
Virginia and Wisconsin, and like P. rolfsi
is strongly sexually dimorphic. P. carneo-
lus is distinguished from P. rolfsi by the
slightly reddish brown coloration, and the
form of the male genitalia in which the
vesica 1S more strongly curved than in P.
rolfsi. P. carneolus is reported to breed on
Virginia pine, Pinus virginiana Mill. in the
United States (Knight 1927; Schwartz and
Schuh 1999).
Family PENTATOMIDAE
Neottiglossa sulcifrons Stal
SK: 19, Indian Head, Aspen Grove,
3.vill. 1939 (C.R. Douglas) [CNC].
Four species of the genus Neottiglossa
Kirby are now known from Canada. Two
of these, N. trilineata (Kirby) and N. un-
data (Say), occur across Canada from
Yukon to Newfoundland, while N. tumidi-
frons Downes 1s confined to British Co-
lumbia in Canada (Maw et al. 2000). The
following key modified from that in Rider
(1989), will separate the species of Neot-
tiglossa now known from Canada.
1. Coxae pale yellow; evaporative sur-
face on pterothorax ventrally pale yellow
to brown-grey with contrasting black punc-
-Coxae fuscous to black; evaporative
surfaces on pterothorax ventrally black
with concolorous punctures ..............:ce 3
2. Dorsal surface of head and propleura
mostly black with concolorous punctures
etree te ae Oar strilineata (Kirby)
-Dorsal surface of head and propleura
with large areas pale yellow to brown with
black puncture... sundata (Say)
3. Trochanters dark fuscous; scutellum
lacking pale median line ......su/cifrons Stal
-Trochanters pale; scutellum usually
with pale median line. tumidifrons Downes
N. sulcifrons is usually collected in
grassy habitats (McPherson 1982) and is
recorded through much of the eastern and
central Untied States, south to Georgia,
Texas, New Mexico and _é Arizona.
Froeschner (1988) and Rider (1989) sum-
marize the records for the US states. To
these can be added the following new state
records.
COLORADO: 19, Boulder, Flagstaff
Cn., 5800' (1705 m), 8.vili. 1961 (J.R.
Stainer); 14 19, id, 11.vi.1961; 19, Boul-
der, 12.vi.1961 (B.H. Poole); 29, Mt. Ev-
ans, 9800' (2987 m), Doolittle Ranch,
10.viii. 1961 (B.H. Poole); 14, Nederland,
Science Lodge, 9500' (2896 m), 1.v11.1961
(J.R. Stainer); 14, id, 6.vii.1961; 19, id,
9000' (2743 m), 29.vii.1961; 39, Neder-
land, Caribou, 8700' (2652 m), 7.viil. 1961
(J.R. Stainer), OKLAHOMA: 19, Texoma
Lk., 15.vu1.1954 (J.G. Chillcott). SOUTH
CAROLINA: 19, Aiken, 24.vili. 1957
(W.R. Richards); 19, Montmorenci,
23.v1.1957 (W.R.M. Mason) [CNC].
Little is known about the life history
and habits of N. trilineata (McPherson
1982). It is recorded from Alaska (Scudder
1997) (13, Fairbanks, 16.vi.1952 (J.H.
Hartley) [CNC]) and south in the United
States to California, Colorado, Wyoming
and Nebraska (Froeschner 1988; Rider
1989).
N. tumidifrons is a Cordilleran species
recorded from California, Oregon and
Washington, in addition to British Colum-
bia. It occurs in grassy habitats, and in
British Columbia is confined to southeast-
ern Vancouver Island, and the dry southern
interior of the province. N. undata 1s much
more widely distributed, occurring in
grassy habitats from Alaska to California
in the west, and from Newfoundland south
to North Carolina in the east (McPherson
1982).
The fifth species in North America, N.
cavifrons Stal, occurs from Virginia south
to Georgia and South Carolina (New Re-
cord: 19, SC, Montmorenci, 23.vi.1957
(W.R.M. Mason) [CNC)}) in the east. There
are records from Arizona, California, Ore-
gon, Texas and Utah in the west
(Froeschner 1988; Rider 1989) , but the
early reports of this species from British
Columbia (Stoner 1926; Downes 1927) are
in error, as these records refer to N. tumidi-
frons (Downes 1935).
Trichopepla grossa Van Duzee
BC: 14, Osoyoos IRI, 'Brights Winery’,
Purshia assoc., BGxhl AN, Pitfall trap
V2-4, 2.vi.-7.vii.1994 (G.G.E. Scudder)
[UBC]; 19, Fairview, White Lake, Big
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
sage assoc., BGxhl SWm, 7.vui.1996
(G.G.E. Scudder) [UBC].
T. grossa is a Cordilleran species, pre-
viously recorded from California, Colo-
rado, Idaho, Oregon and South Dakota
(McDonald 1976). Four other species of
Trichopepla Stal are recorded from Canada
(Maw et al. 2000), and 7. grossa is most
similar to 7. aurora Van Duzee, which in
Canada is also confined to British Colum-
bia. McDonald (1976) gives a key to sepa-
rate the species. 7. grossa has the abdomi-
nal connexiva rather uniform pale brown
or yellowish marginally, the scutellum has
a pale yellow tip, and the base of the
pronotum and coria are concolorous with
rest of the dorsal surface. In contrast, T.
aurora has an alternating pattern of black
and pale brown on the abdominal connex-
iva, the tip of the scutellum is concolour-
ous and not pale, while the base of the
pronotum and the coria are usually clearly
roseus.
Family THY REOCORIDAE
Galgupha ovalis Hussey
In Canada, first reported from Alberta
and British Columbia in Maw et al. (2000),
without data. Now also known from Sas-
katchewan. Specimens examined: 57¢
829.
AB: Elkwater, 15.vi.1955 (George E.
Ball) [UA]; Gull Lake, 8.vi.1929,
14.v1.1929, 22.vi1.1929 (E.H. Strickland)
[UA], previously determined as G. nitidu-
loides (Wolff); Medicine Hat [LM]; CFB
Suffield, NWA, 26.v.1994, 16-28.v1.1994,
16-29.v1.1994, 28.v1.1994, 28.vii.-16.vil.
1994, 16.v1.1995, 29.vi.1995, 31.vii.1995
(A.T. Finnamore) [APM]. BC: Chopaka,
12.v.1983 (S.G. Cannings); Chopaka,
SATH habitat, BGxhl SN pitfall trap
CH6-2, 23.vi.-18.vii.1996 (J. Jarrett); Fair-
view, White L., Big sage assoc., BGxhl
SWn, 7.vii.1996 (G.G.E. Scudder) [UBC];
Enderby, 22.vili. 1920 (W. Downes)
[UBC], as G. atra A. & S. in Parshley
(1921), Downes (1927) and Walley (1929);
Keremeos Creek, 2000' (607 m) sagebrush
flat, fall trap, 9.vu.1982, 16.vii.1982,
23.vi1.1982 (H. Kirk) [UBC]; near Oliver,
22-23.v.1958 (G.E. Ball) [UA]; Oliver,
29.v.1924 (P.N. Vroom) [PFC]; Oliver,
26.v.1945 (D. Blair) [UBC]; Oliver, IRI,
"Water tower', Purshia assoc., BGxhl AN,
pitfall trap U2-4, 1.vi.-7.vi1.1994 (G.G.E.
Scudder) [UBC]; Oliver, McIntyre Cr.,
3000' (915 m), 29.v.1958 (H. & A. How-
den) [CNC]; Oliver, 5 mi. N., 21.v.1958
(H. & A. Howden) [CNC]; Oliver, 8 mi.
N., 18.v.1958, 19.v.1958 (H. & A. How-
den) [CNC]; Osoyoos, 21.v.1924 (K.F.
Auden) [PFC]; Osoyoos, 19.v.1958 (H. &
A. Howden) [CNC]; Osoyoos, 49°03'N
119°31'W [Desert Centre], BGxhl
8PD/2AN:P, pitfall trap, 19.vi1.-17.viil.
1996, 23.v1.-28.v11.1997, 27.vil.-
17.vini.1997, 17.viti.-21.1x.1997 (J. Jarrett)
[UBC]; Osoyoos, East Bench, 22.viu. 1995
(G.G.E. Scudder) [UBC]; Osoyoos,
Haynes Ecol. Res., 11.v.1982, 15.v.1985
(S.G. Cannings) [UBC]; Osoyoos, Haynes
Ecol. Res., BGxhl AN, recovery after fire,
pitfall trap, 9.vi.-7.vil. 1994 (G.G.E.
Scudder) [UBC]; Osoyoos, IRI, Inkaneep,
Purshia Assoc., BGxhl AN, pitfall trap
T5-5, 6.vii.-9.vi1.1995 (G.G.E. Scudder)
[UBC]; Penticton, 17.v.1985 (R.J. Can-
nings) [UBC]; Quesnel, 11.v11.1948 (G.J.
Spencer) [CNC]; Rock Creek, 7.vi.1959
(L.A. Kelton) [CNC]; Ross _ Lake,
Okanagan Falls, 5.vi.1959 (R.E. Leech)
[CNC]; Vaseux L., 5.vu.1981 (S.G. Can-
nings) [UBC]; Vaseux L., 2000' (607 m),
13.v1.1983 (R.J. Cannings) [UBC]; Vaseux
L., 2-3 mi. E., 24.v.1958 (G.E. Ball) [UA];
White L., Okanagan Falls, ex. Plantago,
6.vu1.1985 (R.J. Cannings) [UBC]. SK:
Cypress Hills Prov. Pk., Rte. 221, 27.4 km.
E. Pt. Walsh prairie, 18.v.1976 (Danny
Shpeley, George E. Ball) [UA]; Regina,
2.vi.1943 (P. Larkin) [CNC].
G. ovalis has been reported to occur on
Pycnanthemum and Vernonia, and in the
United States ranges from Massachusetts
west to Montana, and south to Florida,
Arizona, Texas and Guatemala
(McPherson 1982). McPherson (1982)
provides a key to separate G. ovalis from
the other three species reported from Can-
ada (Maw ef al. 2000). In G. ovalis, the
metapleura laterally are impunctate, the
corium has a distinct ridge inside the costal
128 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
groove, the scutellum is gradually de-
clivent posteriorly, and the posterior border
of the pygophore in the male, when viewed
from below is weakly concave, and the
dorsal rim lacks numerous long setae pos-
teriorly.
Family TINGIDAE
Stephanitis takeyai Drake & Maa
BC: 174 339, Richmond, ex. Pieris
japonica (Thunb.) D. Don, 31 September
2001 (R. Costello) [CNC, UBC].
S. takeyai is an alien species in North
America, first reported on Pieris japonica
(Japanese andromeda) at Greenwich, Con-
necticut in 1946 (Bailey 1950). Subse-
quently, it has been reported in several
other eastern states (Dunbar 1974; Wheeler
1977) where it also occurs in nursery and
landscape plantings on Lindera bezoin (L.)
Blume (spicebush) and Sassafras albidum
(Nutt.) Nees (Wheeler 1977).
The occurrence of this tingid, com-
monly called the Andromeda Lace Bug, in
British Columbia represents the first record
of this alien species in Western North
America. It is likely the result of a separate
introduction via nursery stock.
S. takeyai can be separated from S. rho-
dodendri Horvath, another alien species in
Canada that has separate introductions in
both the east and west in Canada, by its
more inflated and higher pronotal hood, its
shorter lateral carinae on the pronotum,
and by the much darker markings on the
hood and hemelytra. The paranota are al-
most vertical in S. takeyai, whereas in S.
rhododendri they are more flared (Bailey
1950).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by grants
from the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada. I am in-
debted to the late Dr. R.C. Froeschner for
confirmation of some of the determina-
tions. I thank the following for loan of ma-
terial, or permission to study collections in
their institution: Drs. A.T. Finnamore
(APM), R.G. Foottit (CNC), T.A. Wheeler
(LM), L.M. Humble (PFC), and G.E. Ball
(UA). Dr. M.D. Schwartz determined the
specimen of Pinophylus carneolus in the
CNC.
REFERENCES
Bailey, N.S. 1950. An Asiatic tingid new to North America (Heteroptera). Psyche 57: 143-145.
Downes, W. 1927. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera and Homoptera from British Columbia. Proceed-
ings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 23: 1-22.
Downes, W. 1935. Additions to the list of B.C. Hemiptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of
British Columbia 31: 46-48.
Dunbar, D.M. 1974. Bionomics of the andromeda lacebug. Stephanitis takeyai. Memoirs of the Connecti-
cut Entomological Society 1974: 277-289.
Froeschner, R.C. 1960. Cydnidae of the Western Hemisphere. Proceedings of the Untied States National
Museum 111: 337-680.
Froeschner, R.C. 1988. Family Pentatomidae Leach, 1815. The Stink Bugs, pp. 544-597. Jn T.J. Henry
and R.C. Froeschner (eds), Catalog of the Heteroptera, or True Bugs, of Canada and the Continental
United States. E.J. Brill, New York.
Knight, H.H. 1927. Descriptions of twelve new species of Miridae from the District of Columbia and
vicinity (Hemiptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 40: 9-18.
Maw, H.E.L., R.G. Foottit, K.G.A. Hamilton and G.G.E. Scudder. 2000. Checklist of the Hemiptera of
Canada and Alaska. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.
McDonald, F.J.D. 1976. Revision of the genus Trichopepla (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in North America.
Journal of the New York Entomological Society 84: 9-22.
McPherson, J.E. 1982. The Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera) of Northeastern North America with emphasis on
the fauna of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.
Paiero, S.M., S.A. Marshall and K.G.A. Hamilton. 2004. New records of Hemiptera from Canada and
Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 134 (2003): 115-129.
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 129
Rider, D.A. 1989. Review of the New World species of the genus Neottiglossa Kirby (Heteroptera: Penta-
tomidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 97: 394-408.
Schuh, R.T. 2001. Revision of New World Plagiognathus Fieber, with comments on the Palearctic fauna
and the description of a new genus (Heteroptera: Miridae: Phylinae). Bulletin of the American Mu-
seum of Natural History 266: 1-267.
Schwartz, M.D. and R.T. Schuh. 1999. New genera and species of conifer-inhabiting Phyline plant bugs
from North America (Heteroptera: Miridae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 107:
204-237.
Schwartz, M.D. and G.G.E. Scudder. 2001. Miridae (Heteroptera) new to Canada with some taxonomic
changes. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 108(2000): 248-267.
Schwartz, M.D. and G.G.E. Scudder. 2003. Seven new species of Miridae (Heteroptera) from British
Columbia and Alaska, and synonymy of Adelphocoris superbus (Uhler). Journal of the New York
Entomological Society 111: 65-95.
Scudder, G.G.E. 1997. True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Yukon, pp. 241-336. Jn H.V. Danks and J.A. Dow-
nes (eds), Insects of the Yukon. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Ottawa.
Scudder, G.G.E. 2000. Heteroptera (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha) new to Canada. Part 1. Journal of the
Entomological Society of British Columbia 97: 51-56.
Stoner, D. 1926. Pentatomoidea from western Canada. Canadian Entomologist 58: 28-30.
Wheeler, A.G. Jr. 1997. Spicebush and sassafras as new North American hosts of andromeda lace bug,
Stephanitis takeyai (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington
79: 168-171.
130 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004 131
Lestes disjunctus Selys and L. forcipatus Rambur
(Odonata: Lestidae): Some Solutions for Identification
JOHN P. SIMAIKA! and ROBERT A. CANNINGS””
ABSTRACT
Five species of the damselfly genus Lesfes live in British Columbia, Canada, and of
these, Lestes forcipatus Rambur and L. disjunctus Selys are the most similar and most
difficult to separate morphologically. Females can be readily distinguished by the size of
the ovipositor, but males are difficult to separate. In British Columbia, L. disjunctus 1s
the more common, widespread and familiar species. Before 1998, L. forcipatus speci-
mens were mistaken for those of L. disjunctus because the former is primarily an eastern
North American species and because most Lestfes species are usually identified using
male characters. With the discovery that L. forcipatus 1s part of the western fauna, an
evaluation of the relative status of the two species in British Columbia is necessary. The
best method for separating the two species uses the length of the anterior lamina (part of
the secondary genitalia) as a unique character or as part of ratios using other measure-
ments. In addition, in at least western North America, L. forcipatus males are more pru-
inescent than those of L. disjunctus, especially on the thorax. Identification using the
pruinescence pattern was tested in the field and is recommended as a simple and accu-
rate method for western North America. Soaking Odonata specimens in acetone, a com-
mon technique used to preserve colours, damages surface pruinescence and should not
be used to preserve mature, pruinescent adults, including those of Lestes species. To
identify L disjunctus and L. forcipatus males treated in acetone, it may be necessary to
calculate ratios based on various character measurements. Future research should inves-
tigate spatial and temporal differences between the species, as well as modes of inter-
specific communication.
Key Words: Odonata, Lestes forcipatus, Lestes disjunctus, identification, British Co-
lumbia, pruinescence, acetone, anterior lamina.
INTRODUCTION
Five species of the damselfly genus
Lestes (Odonata: Zygoptera: Lestidae)
occur in British Columbia (BC), Canada:
L. congener Hagen (Spotted Spreadwing),
L. disjunctus Selys (Northern Spreadwing),
L. dryas Kirby (Emerald Spreadwing), L.
forcipatus Rambur (Sweetflag Spread-
wing), and L. unguiculatus Hagen (Lyre-
tipped Spreadwing). L. disjunctus is the
most common, widespread and familiar
Lestes species in the province, and one of
the most abundant odonates in Canada,
ranging as far north as the Arctic treeline
(Cannings 2002). It inhabits many types of
standing water habitats with abundant
aquatic vegetation and, in southern BC,
adults fly from mid-June to mid-October
(Cannings 2002).
L. forcipatus 1s generally much less
common than L. disjunctus, although it 1s
as abundant in some cold fen habitats, and
both species often occur at the same site. L.
forcipatus does not range as far north as L.
disjunctus and, although not known from
much of BC’s north, it has been collected
in the southeastern Yukon. In the western
Canadian Cordillera, it is most common in
sedge fens (Cannings 2002). Walker
"4402-1063 Foul Bay Road, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8S 4J3
‘ Royal British Columbia Museum, 675 Belleville Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9W2
* Author to whom correspondence should be sent
132 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
(1953) described L. forcipatus habitat in
Ontario as "ponds, both temporary and
permanent, marshy lakes, and slow, weedy
streams". In BC L. forcipatus has been
collected from mid-June to mid-September
(Cannings 2002).
L. forcipatus was not reported in BC
until 1998, when it was first collected in
the Rocky Mountain Trench north of
Golden and subsequently found in many
other localities in the southeastern part of
the province. However, it probably has
long been a resident of the province; it was
long overlooked because of its close re-
semblance to L. disjunctus (Ramsay and
Cannings 2000). Before 1998, L. forci-
patus was not known west of Saskatche-
wan (Walker 1953, Westfall and May
1996), and had just recently been found in
Washington State, the first record west of
Montana (Ramsay and Cannings 2000).
The species is now known from seven
counties in that state and one in Idaho
(Paulson 2004). By 1999 L. forcipatus had
been discovered at several other BC loca-
tions farther south and west, and by 2000
had been collected on Vancouver Island.
Some of our old museum specimens of L.
disjunctus from many regions of the prov-
ince have been re-identified as L. forci-
patus, indicating that museum collections
across western Canada probably contain
many misidentified specimens.
Males of L. disjunctus and L. forcipatus
are difficult to separate, although numer-
ous characters have been employed in
identification (Walker 1953, Westfall and
May 1996, Catling 2002, Donnelly 2003).
The usual method of distinguishing the two
species and confirming their presence at a
location is through identification of the
females. In L. forcipatus females the ovi-
positor valves reach the tips of the cerci; in
L. disjunctus they do not (Walker 1953,
Cannings 2002) (Fig. 1).
Lestes species are usually brown, black,
metallic green or bronze above and mostly
pale below; especially in males, the head,
thorax, base and tip of abdomen become
pruinescent bluish white with age. Pruines-
cence (pruinosity) is a waxy substance
produced by the hypodermis in many
groups of Odonata and excreted on the
cuticular surface through porous canals
(Gorb 1994). Pruinescence is implicated in
thermal regulation in dragonflies (Garrison
1976, Paulson 1983) and is thought to play
a role in species recognition and intraspeci-
fic communication -- indeed, the patterns
of pruinescence in males may be a result of
sexual selection (Jacobs 1955, Corbet
1999). Therefore, pruinescence patterns
might offer good species identification
characters, especially in males.
The object of this project was to find
novel and definitive distinguishing charac-
teristics between males of L. disjunctus
and L. forcipatus, building on the studies
of workers in eastern North America.
Thus, we hope (a) to distinguish males in
the absence of associated females; (b) to
identify, with relative ease, the species in
the field, (c) to correct any misidentifica-
tions of specimens in BC museum collec-
tions; and (d) to establish accurate distribu-
tions for both species in BC. The first part
of the present work measures certain struc-
tures of the male genitalia to find the best
features to separate the species. The sec-
ond part quantifies the degree of pruines-
cence of adult males of each species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens. We measured 50 male L. dis-
Junctus and 45 male L. forcipatus speci-
mens from localities in BC and Alberta
(two L. disjunctus only from Alberta) and
from Washington and Maine in the United
States. Eighty-four of the specimens were
from the Royal British Columbia Museum
(RBCM), Victoria; the others were bor-
rowed from the Spencer Entomological
Museum, UBC, Vancouver, and the Slater
Museum of Natural History, Tacoma, WA.
A list of the specimens and their collection
data is on file at the RBCM and is avail-
able on request. Most specimens were in
copula or in tandem, except for three L.
forcipatus and one L. disjunctus; thus, the
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
153
Figure 1. Lateral view of apex of female abdomen. Top, Lestes disjunctus; Bottom, L. forci-
patus. OV = ovipositor.
identities of almost all males were con-
firmed using the associated females.
Measurements. During examination, each
specimen was held by the base of the
wings using a small padded alligator clamp
soldered to a #7 insect pin. The pin was
inserted into a cork mount, and the speci-
men held in a standardized measuring posi-
tion. Specimens were examined at 100x
magnification and measurements were
made to 0.01 mm.
Thirteen characters were measured;
terminology follows Westfall and May
(1996) and Donnelly (2003).
Cercus (Fig. 2):
1. Distance from base of apical tooth to
base of basal tooth (AB).
2. Distance from apex of cercus to base
of apical tooth (AC).
3. Distance from swelling at medial
base of cercus to base of basal tooth (BB)
(not figured).
Secondary genitalia (abdominal segment
2) (Fig. 3):
4. Length of the anterior lamina
(anterior hamule) (AL). Walker (1952,
1953) did not explain how to measure the
lamina, but Catling (2002) and Donnelly
(2003) prefer to measure the ventral length
of the hamule from where it appears from
above sternite 1. He notes, however, that
specimens show different degrees of bend-
ing in abdominal segments | and 2 and
thus there is no good reference for the ha-
mule base. We measured the blade of the
lamina only.
5. Length of membranous shield of
sperm vesicle (MS) (penis vesicle of Cat-
ling (2002) and Donnelly (2003)).
6. Length of penis shaft (PS).
7. Length of sperm vesicle (SV).
Apex of abdominal segment 10 (Fig. 4):
8. Height of apical hood (HT). This
structure is a triangular projection on the
dorsal apex of abdominal segment 10. The
apex of the abdomen was viewed end-on.
9. Width of base of apical hood (HL).
10. Width of the abdomen (WA). The
greatest width of the abdomen measured
when the apex of the abdomen was viewed
end-on.
Other:
11. Length of abdominal segment 2
(S2). Measured in lateral view.
12. Length of abdominal segment 3
(S3). Measured in lateral view.
13. Width of head (HD). The distance
between the extreme lateral edges of the
eyes, measured dorsally.
We analysed the difference between
species for each character measured using
a z-test after checking for uniformity of
variance, using the MS Excel Data Analy-
sis Tool (Stinson and Dodge 2004).
Pruinescence.
Pterothorax (Fig. 5). We compared the
extent of pruinescence on the head, ptero-
thorax (fused mesothorax and metathorax),
and abdominal segments 1 to 10 between
males of the two species. Pterothoracic
pruinescence was divided into several
value categories, as follows: absent = 0,
low lateral (below interpleural suture) = 1,
mid lateral (below midline of mese-
134 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
eA
BI~
a
i.
/ nS
/ Kw
AT
Figure 2. Dorsal view of male primary genitalia. Left, Lestes disjunctus; Right, L. forcipatus.
AB = distance between base of apical tooth and base of basal tooth of cercus, AC = distance
between base of apical tooth and apex of cercus, AT = apical tooth of cercus, BT = basal tooth
Figure 3. Ventral view of male secondary genitalia. AL = length of blade of anterior lamina,
MS = length of membranous shield of sperm vesicle, PS = length of penis shaft, SV = length of
sperm vesicle, S2 = abdominal segment 2, S3 = abdominal segment 3.
np
Figure 4. Diagrammatic apical view of abdominal segment 10 of male Lestes disjunctus. HT =
height of apical hood, HL = width of base of apical hood, WA = width of abdomen.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
135
Figure 5. Lateral view of thorax of Lestes disjunctus male. Stippling represents coverage of
pruinescence: A, low lateral; B, mid lateral; C, complete lateral.
pimeron)= 2, complete lateral (below me-
sepisternal stripe) = 3, lateral+dorsal
(complete lateral plus mesepisternal stripe
and dorsal midline) = 4, complete thorax
(ventral + lateral + dorsal) = 5. Because
specimens had been treated in acetone and
the pruinescence patterns were thus dam-
aged, both sides of the pterothorax were
compared, and the more pruinescent side
recorded.
Abdominal segment 2 (Fig. 6). We exam-
ined segment 2 for presence or absence of
a rectangular patch free of pruinescence
and covering about the apical one-third of
the tergite. If the patch was present, we
assigned a value of 1; if absent, a value of
0.
RESULTS
Measurements. Nine measurements failed
to show a significant difference between
the species: AC, BB, HT, HD, MS, PS, S3,
SV and WA.
Table 1 summarizes the seven measure-
ments that we consider important to this
study; these include the mean, standard
deviation, range and significance values
for z-tests. In Table | the z-test values for
the HD, S3, and WA are not significant.
However, tests of the same measurements
in character ratios show significant differ-
ences between the species.
Ratios of character measurements are
often useful in preventing individual size
variation from obscuring the value of a
character when comparing species varia-
tion. Analysis showed that several charac-
ter ratios calculated were not useful in
separating the two species: AB/AC, AB/
AL, AC/AL, AC/HD, BB/HD, HL/AL,
HT/HD, HT/HL, HT/WA, SV/AL, SV/S2,
MS/AL, MS/HD, MS/S2, PS/HD, S3/HD,
SV/HD, WA/HD. The significant character
ratios for both L. forcipatus and L. disjunc-
tus are summarized in Table 1.
Pruinescence. The head and abdominal
segment 1 were pruinescent in all speci-
mens; the pruinescence on segments 3-10
was not significantly different. All com-
parisons were inconclusive except for
those of the pterothorax and abdominal
segment 2.
Pterothorax (Table 2). In all specimens of
both species, the pterothorax was pruines-
cent. In L. forcipatus, it was completely
pruinose (covered ventrally, laterally and
dorsally) 72.5% (n = 40) of the time; L.
disjunctus was never completely pruines-
cent, and never covered dorsally. L. forci-
patus was covered completely laterally and
dorsally in 20% of specimens but never
showed only low lateral or mid lateral pru-
inescence. Of the 40 specimens measured,
three (7.5%) had only the lateral area com-
pletely covered. L. disjunctus was com-
pletely covered laterally 60.0% (n = 30),
mid laterally 30%, and low laterally 10%
of the time.
Abdominal segment 2. Segment 2 1n all L.
forcipatus specimens had a distinct dorsal
bare patch. In L. disjunctus an indistinct,
different sort of patch was present 23.1%
(n = 26) of the time. It was both asymmet-
rical and lightly pruinescent. The average +
SD patch size (n = 28) in L. forcipatus was
0.67 + 0.13 mm long, by 0.50 + 0.11 mm
wide.
136 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
PR om _— PT S2
Figure 6. Lateral view of thorax and abdominal segments 1 and 2 of fully pruinescent males.
Left, Lestes disjunctus; Right, L. forcipatus. PR = prothorax, PT = pterothorax, S2 = abdomi-
nal segment 2.
Table 1.
Summary statistics of measurements and ratios made for Lestes forcipatus and L. disjunctus.
Two-tailed z-tests were used to compare characters between species. Distances measured are as
follows: AB = apical tooth of cercus to basal tooth of cercus, AL = length of blade of anterior
hamule, HD = width of head, HL = width of base of apical hood, S2 = lateral length of ab-
dominal segment 2, S3 = lateral length of abdominal segment 3, WA = width of abdomen.
Character L. forcipatus L. disjunctus z-test results
P
Distance Mean SD Range n Mean SD Range n Z (Z<=2)
AB 0.51 0.04 047-060 42 045 0.05 033-053 46 6.10 0.00
AL 0.91 0.09 0.67-1.20 44 0.72 0.06 060-1.00 50 11.37 0.00
HD 4.73 0.16 433-500 39 4.77 O19 4.33-5.07 42 -0.89 0.37
HL 0.53 0.06 040-0.67 41 044 0.05 033-053 45 7.42 0.00
S2 2.57 0.16 2.27-2.87 44 240 0.13 213-267 50 5.47 0.00
S3 4.32 0.24 3.87-487 44 434 0.26 3.93-5.00 50 -041 0.68
WA 1.27 0.009 1.13-1.53 41 1.27 0.10 100-140 45 0.16 0.87
P
(Z<=2)
AB/HD 0.11 0.01 0.10-0.13 37 0.09 0.01 0.07-0.11 40 6.65 0.00
AL/HD 0.19 0.02 0.14-0.24 39 O15 O01 014-020 42 11.99 0.00
AL/S2 0.35 0.03 0.27-042 44 0.30 0.03 0.25-039 49 8.27 0.00
AL/S3 0.21 0.02 0.14-0.26 44 0.17 0.01 014-022 49 11.08 0.00
HL/HD 0.11 0.01 0.08-0.14 36 0.09 0.01 0.07-0.11 38 7.50 0.00
HL/WA 0.42 0.04 0.30-0.50 41 035 0.04 0.28-0.47 45 7.53 0.00
S2/HD 0.55 0.03 0.48-0.59 39 0.51 0.02 0.47-054 42 7.74 0.00
$2/S3 0.60 0.03 052-064 44 055 0.02 050-060 49 8.57 0.00
Ratio Mean SD Range n Mean SD Range n Z
DISCUSSION
Measurements. The search for diagnostic tinction between the two species is by
characters to differentiate L. forcipatus Garman (1917), who illustrated the longer
males from those of L. disjunctus is not a —_—ovipositor in L. forcipatus. Montgomery
new one. According to Donnelly (2003), (1941) noted the widespread confusion
the earliest paper that demonstrates a dis- between the species and cited four diag-
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
137
Table 2.
Percentage of specimens of Lestes forcipatus and L. disjunctus displaying selected patterns of
pruinescence on the pterothorax. Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate the patterns.
L. forcipatus L. disjunctus
Pruinosity pattern % (n=40) % (n=30)
Lateral-ventral-dorsal i235 0
Dorso-lateral 20 0
Complete lateral Ind 60
Mid lateral 0 30
Low lateral 0 10
Absent 0 0
nostic differences: (1) distance between
teeth of cercus; (2) width of apical hood of
abdominal segment 10; (3) width of base
of membranous shield of sperm vesicle
(penis vesicle), and (4) shape of penis (see
Donnelly 2003). When Walker (1952) re-
viewed Montgomery’s findings, he re-
jected the shape of the penis, but retained
the other three characters. Walker (1952)
added the relative lengths of abdominal
segments 2 and 3 and the length of the
anterior lamina (see Donnelly 2003).
Westfall and May (1996) also base their
separation of the species on the relative
lengths of abdominal segments 2 and 3, but
added the distance between the tip of the
basal tooth and the swelling near its base,
the shape of the membranous shield of the
sperm vesicle and the relative size of the
cercal teeth.
Donnelly’s (2003) findings are different
again. He stressed the use of the anterior
lamina length, the distance between the
apical and basal teeth on the cercus, the
shape of the paraproct and the apical hood
width on segment 10. He preferred not to
use the membranous shield, the relative
lengths of abdominal segments 2 and 3,
and the distance from the basal swelling of
the cercus to the tip of the basal tooth. Cat-
ling’s (2002) useful study of Ontario mate-
rial concluded that the best characters were
the relative heights of the apical and basal
teeth of the cercus and the relative extent
of pale and dark pigment (not pruines-
cence) on the thorax.
Our findings support the conclusion
that it is best to use a combination of char-
acters for identification. In western North
America, at least, both morphology and the
pattern of pruinescence should be consid-
ered. A short review of useful characters
and character ratios follows:
1. Anterior lamina (AL). Rather than meas-
uring the whole length of the lamina
(including the stalk), we measured the ex-
panded apical blade-like part only. The
lamina in L. forcipatus is longer (mean =
0.91 mm) than that of L. disjunctus (mean
= 0.72 mm). The ranges of the lengths of
the AL overlap in the two species, but the
length in L. disjunctus does not exceed 1
mm, while that of L. forcipatus reaches
1.20 mm. We found the lamina to be sig-
nificantly different in three character ratios
— those using the head width, the length of
segment 2 and the length of segment 3.
2. Base of apical tooth to base of basal
tooth (AB). AB is a good identification
character as a simple measurement or as a
ratio with head width (Table 1). The dis-
tance between the teeth is longer in L. for-
cipatus than in L. disjunctus; this result 1s
supported by Donnelly (2003). Although
there is some overlap in the measurements
of the two species (L. disjunctus, 0.33 —
0.53 mm; L. forcipatus,0.47 — 0.60 mm),
the character 1s useful when used in con-
junction with others.
3. Width of the apical hood (HL)
The ranges of apical hood widths over-
lapped in the two species -- L. disjunctus
(0.33 — 0.53 mm) and L. forcipatus (0.40 —
0.67 mm). The HL is generally greater in
138 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
L. forcipatus, which gives the apical hood
the wide, low appearance (as opposed to
the pinched shape in L. disjunctus) that 1s
often used to distinguish the species
(Donnelly, 2003, Lam 2004). Based on our
data, this is a generalization and is not reli-
able for differentiating the species. The HL
is useful when used in ratios using the head
and abdomen.
4. Width of the head (HD). There was no
significant difference between the species
in the width of the head. We used the
measurement to calculate ratios.
5. Lateral lengths of abdominal segments 2
and 3. There was a significant difference
between the length of segment 2 in both
species; however, the ranges overlapped
considerably. Segment 3 was not different
between species but the relative lengths of
segments 2 and 3 were significant.
6. Width of the abdomen (WA). This meas-
urement is significant only when used in a
ratio with measurements of the apical
hood. Comparing species using this char-
acter 1s difficult as the ranges overlap
greatly.
Pruinescence. The literature from eastern
North America, where L. forcipatus has
been studied for decades, does not mention
pruinescence as a basis for separating L.
disjunctus and L. forcipatus (Walker 1952,
1953, Westfall and May 1996, Catling
2002, Donnelly 2003, Lam 2004). In that
region, pruinescence patterns are appar-
ently different from those in northwestern
North America and are of little use in spe-
cies identification. On the other hand, as
was originally noted in Washington State
by Dennis Paulson, (D.R. Paulson, Slater
Museum, University of Puget Sound, Ta-
coma; pers. comm.), in far western North
America, pruinescence in mature individu-
als seems a good character for separating
the species. It has the advantage of being
easy to use 1n the field without even having
to capture the specimen. Further study of
these patterns over the whole range of the
two species 1s required.
Maturity 1s accompanied by pruines-
cence on abdominal segments 2, 8, 9, and
10, and to a lesser degree on abdominal
segments 3, 6, and 7. Patterns on abdomi-
nal segments other than segment 2 are not
useful in identification because they are
almost identical in shape, intensity and
frequency of occurrence in both species.
Abdominal segment 2 however, is reliable
in differentiating L. disjunctus and L. forci-
patus (Table 2.). Although 23% of L. dis-
junctus appear to have a clear patch at the
apex of this segment it has, upon closer
inspection, not a clearly defined rectangu-
lar shape but an asymmetrical shape with
some pruinscence throughout. There was
little individual variation in the position of
pruinescence in either L. forcipatus or L.
disjunctus.
Conclusions. Even with careful analysis of
each character, a specimen lacking pru-
inescence is difficult to identify. As a gen-
eral rule, a specimen with longer or wider
measurements than the average L. disjunc-
tus specimen should be regarded as a po-
tential L. forcipatus. The most worthwhile
characters to choose for identification are
the AB (the distance between the base of
the apical tooth and the base of the basal
tooth of the circus), AL (the length of the
blade of the anterior lamina), HL (the basal
width of the apical hood), and S2 (the lat-
eral length of abdominal segment 2). In
each, the mean distance is higher in L. for-
cipatus and, although ranges overlap con-
siderably, the range exceeds that of L. dis-
junctus.
The most useful ratios are the above
measurements divided by the head width
(AB/HD, AL/HD and HL/HD). In AB/HD
the ranges of the two species overlap mini-
mally compared to those of the other sig-
nificant ratios. In the remaining two ratios
the range of L. forcipatus far exceeds that
of L. disjunctus.
In our study, any specimen with pru-
inescence on the dorsum of the pterothorax
(mesepisternal stripe plus midline) is L.
forcipatus, and the species showed this
trait in over 90% of the specimens exam-
ined. L. forcipatus never had only low lat-
eral or mid lateral pruinescence, a common
pattern in L. disjunctus, and showed com-
plete lateral coverage (without any dorsal
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
pruinescence) only 7.5% of the time, com-
pared to 60% of L. disjunctus specimens.
Any specimen with a strongly differenti-
ated, symmetrical, pruinescent-free patch
apically on the dorsum of abdominal seg-
139
ment 2 was L. forcipatus. The segment in
L. disjunctus was usually completely pru-
inescent; about a quarter of the time it was
marked with an irregular, lightly pruines-
cent patch.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dennis Paulson (Slater Museum of
Natural History, Tacoma), Karen Needham
and Rex Kenner (Spencer Entomological
mens. Dennis Paulson gave useful advice
concerning pruinescence patterns. Richard
Ring read an early draft of the manuscript.
Museum, UBC, Vancouver) loaned speci-
REFERENCES
Cannings, R.A. 2002. Introducing the Dragonflies of British Columbia and the Yukon. Royal British Co-
lumbia Museum, Victoria, BC.
Catling, P.M. 2002. An evaluation of some characters separating male Lestes disjunctus and Lestes forci-
patus in Ontario. Ontario Odonata 3: 51-58.
Corbet, P.S. 1999. Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY.
Donnelly, T.W. 2003. Lestes disjunctus, forcipatus and australis: a confusing complex of North American
damselflies. Argia 15(3): 10-13.
Garman, P. 1917. The Zygoptera or damsel-flies of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of
Natural History 12(4): 411-587.
Garrison, R.W. 1976. Multivariate analysis of geographic variation in Libellula luctuosa Burmeister
(Odonata: Libellulidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 52: 181-203.
Gorb, S.N. 1994. Scanning electron microscopy of pruinosity in Odonata. Odonatologica 24(2): 225-228.
Jacobs, M.E. 1955. Studies on territorialism and sexual selection in dragonflies. Ecology 36: 566-586.
Lam, E. 2004. Damselflies of the Northeast. Biodiversity Books, Forest Hills, NY.
Montgomery, B.E. 1941. Records of Indiana dragonflies. X. 1937-1940. Proceedings of the Indiana Acad-
emy of Sciences 50: 229-241.
Paulson, D.R. 1983. A new species of dragonfly, Gomphus (Gomphurus) lynnae spec. nov., from the
Yakima River, Washington, with notes on pruinosity in Gomphidae (Anisoptera). Odonatologica 12
(1): 59-70.
Paulson, D.R. 2004. Western US Odonata range maps: Lestes forcipatus. http://www.ups.edu/biology/
museum/westernOD.html
Ramsay, L.R. and S.G. Cannings. 2000. Dragonflies at Risk in British Columbia. Vol. I, pp. 89-93. Jn L.
Darling (ed.), At Risk: Proceedings of a Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and
Habitats at Risk, Kamloops, BC, 15-19 February 1999. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks,
Victoria, BC.
Stinson, C. and M. Dodge. 2004. Microsoft Office Excel 2003: Inside Out. Microsoft Press. Redmond,
WA.
Walker, E.M. 1952. Lestes disjunctus and forcipatus complex (Odonata: Lestidae). Transactions of the
American Entomological Society 88: 59-74.
Walker, E.M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press, Toronto,
ON.
Westfall, M.J., Jr., and M.L. May. 1996. Damselflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Inc. Gaines-
ville, FL.
140 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
14]
SCIENTIFIC NOTE
A ground-based pheromone trap for monitoring
Agriotes lineatus and A. obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
R.S. VERNON!
The dusky click beetle, Agriotes obscu-
rus (L.) and the lined click beetle, A. /inea-
tus (L.) were introduced to British Colum-
bia (BC) from Europe about a century ago,
and are now serious pests of several crops
(e.g. corn, cereals, potatoes) in the lower
Fraser Valley and Vancouver Island
(Wilkinson 1963). Prior to 1999, delimita-
tion surveys of these species in North
America were based on: inspections of
click beetles in existing private or national
collections (Eidt 1953; Vernon and Pats
1997); habitat searches (Brown 1950); or
click beetles taken in strategic arrays of
pitfall traps (Vernon and Pats 1997). A
major breakthrough in the monitoring of A.
obscurus and A. lineatus has been the iden-
tification of sex pheromones for these and
other Agriotes species in the former USSR
and Europe (e.g. Borg-Karlson ef al.
1988). These pheromones were used suc-
cessfully to survey the distribution of pest
Agriotes species across the former USSR
(Kudryavtsev et al. 1993). Based on this
work, various pheromone blends were suc-
cessfully tested for attractiveness to A.
obscurus and A. lineatus in the lower Fra-
ser Valley in 1999, and an effective proto-
type ground-based pheromone trap was
concurrently developed (RSV unpublished
data).
A simpler commercial version of the
prototype pheromone trap was _ subse-
quently designed (currently known as the
Vernon Beetle Trap, Phero Tech Inc.,
Delta, BC), and was used in delimitation
surveys of A. obscurus and A. lineatus in
BC and Washington State in 2000 and
2001 (Vernon et a/. 2001). The trap design
(details of which were not disclosed previ-
ously for proprietary reasons) has now
been granted a U.S. Industrial Design pat-
ent (US Patent # Des. 465,254) and details
of this trap can now be presented.
The trap (Fig. 1A) is constructed of
durable polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and
consists of two components formed from
extrusion molds (Figs. 1B &C). The main
component is an open ended box (Fig. 1B),
the inside dimensions of which are 15.2 cm
wide by 5 cm high. The other component
is a ramp section (Fig. 1C), two of which
are inserted into opposite ends of the open
box. To assist beetles in climbing, the
ramp section has 27, 0.2 mm high parallel
ridges, spaced 2 mm apart, ending in a
smooth downward curved section at the
top. The ramp (width = 15.2 cm) slides
easily into slots in the floor of the box
component, with the ramp section angled
upwards at 40° from the box floor. The top
of the ramp is held at 3 mm from the top of
the box component by indentations in the
upper box corners and by 3 ridges extend-
ing downwards 3 mm into the box. The
gap formed between the ramp top and ceil-
ing of the box enables Agriotes click bee-
tles to enter, while impeding entry by lar-
ger insects (e.g. large carabids) and other
insectivores (e.g. voles). The ramp section
also contains 2 parallel 7.0 mm deep pro-
trusions, spaced 0.2 mm apart to allow for
insertion of bubble cap pheromone release
devices (Phero Tech Inc.). The length of
the box component is 15.4 cm, such that
when ramp sections are fully inserted into
the open ends the opposing ramps are | cm
apart at the curved apex. When deployed,
the traps are placed at ground level, with
the downward edges of the box section
pushed into the soil, and the fully inserted
entry ramps flush with and slightly covered
by soil to provide unimpeded beetle entry.
When properly installed, the traps can
‘Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 1000, Agassiz, British
Columbia, Canada VOM 1A0
142 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
A
Figure 1. Photographs of a dismantled click beetle pheromone trap (A), showing the box section (B)
and ramp section (C). Labelled details include: a) bubble-cap pheromone lure; b) floor slot for ramp
insertion; c) lure clasp; d) ramp section with climbing ridges; and e) ramp insertion point.
often attract male A. obscurus and A. linea-
tus beetles within a few minutes. Trapping
efficacy remains high throughout the adult
generation of both species (Vernon ef al.
2001), and other genera of click beetles are
rarely captured. Traps with A. J/ineatus
lures seldom catch A. obscurus, whereas A.
obscurus traps will catch significant num-
bers of A. lineatus. Catch of A. lineatus in
A. obscurus traps, however, can be almost
eliminated if traps for both species are
placed within 1.5 m of each other (RSV,
unpublished data).
In a trial conducted in Agassiz B.C.
comparing the relative efficacy of the new
traps versus pitfall traps used in earlier
elaterid surveys (Vernon and Pats 1997),
the pheromone traps caught 54.3 A. obscu-
rus per trap compared with only 1.6 A.
obscurus caught per pitfall trap over a one
month period in 2001. During this trial,
escapes, and/or predation of click beetles
caught in the pitfall traps was common, but
was not observed in the pheromone traps.
Some predation of click beetles by certain
carabids (e.g. Pterostichus melanarius
Illiger) will occur in pheromone traps left
untended for 2-3 week periods late in the
adult generations of A. obscurus and A.
lineatus (RSV pers. obs.). When deployed
in undisturbed areas and inspected rou-
tinely (10-14 days), however, the new
pheromone traps provide an effective, con-
venient and inexpensive method for sur-
veying and detecting A. obscurus and A.
lineatus populations.
REFERENCES
Borg-Karlson, A.K., L. Agren, H. Dobson and G. Bergstrém. 1988. Identification and electroantennographic
activity of sex-specific geranyl esters in an abdominal gland of female Agriotes obscurus (L.) and A.
lineatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Experientia 44: 531-534.
Brown, W.J. 1950. The extralimital distribution of some species of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist
82: 197-205.
Eidt, D.C. 1953. European wireworms in Canada with particular reference to Nova Scotian infestations. The
Canadian Entomologist 85: 408-414.
Kudryavtsev, I., K. Siirde, K. Laats, V. Ismailov and V. Pristavko. 1993. Determination of distribution of
harmful click beetle species (Coleoptera: Elateridae) by synthetic sex pheromones. Journal of Chemical
Ecology 19:1607-1611.
Vernon, B. and P. Pats. 1997. Distribution of two European wireworms, Agriotes lineatus and A. obscurus in
British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 94: 59-61.
Vernon, B., E. Lagasa and H. Philip. 2001. Geographic and temporal distribution of Agriotes obscurus and
A. lineatus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in British Columbia and Washington as determined by pheromone
trap surveys. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 98: 257-265.
Wilkinson, A.T.S. 1963. Wireworms of cultivated land in British Columbia. Proceedings of the Entomologi-
cal Society of British Columbia 60: 3-17.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
143
SCIENTIFIC NOTE
Parasitoids of Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann
(Heteroptera: Coreidae) in British Columbia
SARAH L. BATES!” and JOHN H. BORDEN"?
ABSTRACT— Eggs of the western conifer seed bug, Leptoglossus occidentalis Heide-
mann, were parasitized in the field in British Columbia, Canada, by Gryon pennsylvani-
cum (Ashmead), Anastatus pearsalli Ashmead and an unidentified Ooencyrtus spp. Ash-
mead. Leptoglossus occidentalis represents a new host record for all three parasitoids.
Gryon pennsylvanicum has not previously been reported 1n Canada.
The western conifer seed bug, Lep-
toglossus occidentalis Heidemann, feeds
on several species of conifers (Hedlin ef ai.
1981), and can cause substantial yield
losses in high-value seed orchards (Bates
et al., 2002; Strong et a/. 2001). The gen-
eralist egg parasitoid, Anastatus bifasciatus
(Geoffroy) (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae),
has recently been recovered from L. occi-
dentalis egg masses in Italy (Camponogara
et al. 2003) but little else is known about
egg parasitoids of L. occidentalis
Members of the family Scelionidae are
egg parasitoids of several economically-
important hemipteran pests (Masner 1983).
Gryon pennsylvanicum (Ashmead) is a
polyphagous, solitary parasitoid of coreids,
including Anasa tristis (De Geer) and sev-
eral Leptoglossus species other than occi-
dentalis (Masner 1983; Mitchell 1983;
Yasuda 1990; Daane et al. 2001). Anas-
tatus pearsalli Ashmead (Hymenoptera:
Eupelmidae) is widely distributed through-
out the nearctic, and parasitizes hosts from
several orders and families including
Coreidae (Burks 1979). Members of the
genus Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera: Encyrti-
dae) are also common egg parasitoids of a
number of orders and families (Gordh
1979). We report on the occurrence of G.
pennsylvanicum, A. pearsalli and Ooencyr-
tus sp. in B.C. in a previously undocu-
mented host, L. occidentalis.
Leptoglossus_ occidentalis eggs were
obtained by caging adult females on cone-
bearing branches of lodgepole pine, Pinus
contorta var. latifolia Engelmann, at
Kalamalka Seed Orchard, Vernon, B.C.
(50.27 °N, 119.28 °W). In 2001, females
were collected from orchard trees, and in
2002 they were obtained from an outdoor
colony of overwintered insects maintained
at Simon Fraser University. Eggs were
laid in a single row along needles, and
were collected by removing the entire nee-
dle. Ten egg masses, each bearing 10-13
eggs, were transferred to separate trees
throughout the orchard on 5 July in 2001.
In 2002, 24 egg masses were set out on
trees on 30 June. Wire paper clips were
used to fasten egg-bearing needles to foli-
age. Eggs were 0-7 d old at the time of
transfer. After three weeks, all unhatched
eggs were transferred to Petri dishes, main-
tained at room temperature in the labora-
tory and monitored for parasitoid emer-
gence. Voucher parasitoid specimens were
deposited in Canadian National Collection
of Insects, Agriculture and Agri-Food Can-
ada, Ottawa, Ontario.
In 2001, 32.7% of eggs were parasi-
tized by an_ unidentified scelionid(s),
prompting a more systematic study in the
following year. In 2002, parasitoids
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada VS5A
1S6
Current address: BIOCAP Canada Foundation, Queen’s University, 156 Barrie St., Kingston, ON, Can-
ada K7L 3N6, sb339@cornell.edu
* Current address: PheroTech Inc., 7572 Progress Way, Delta, B.C. V4G 1E9 Canada
144 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
emerged from ca. 29% of L. occidentalis
eggs. Gryon pennsylvanicum was the
predominant parasitoid, attacking 87% of
parasitized eggs. The remaining parasi-
tized eggs were parasitized by Anastatus
pearsalli (8%) and an_ unidentified
Ooencyrtus sp. (Hymenoptera: Encyrti-
dae) (4%). One parasitoid failed to com-
plete its development and was not identi-
fied. Leptoglossus occidentalis has not
previously been recorded as a host for any
of these parasitoids.
Natural rates of parasitism of L. occi-
dentalis eggs may vary at other times dur-
ing the season. In addition, the use of eggs
that were up to 7 d old may have affected
the level of parasitism, because older eggs
would have been acceptable to parasitoids
for a shorter period of time. However, the
relatively high level of parasitism observed
in this study suggests that biological con-
trol with egg parasitoids could serve as a
potential component of an integrated pest
management program for L. occidentalis in
B.C. seed orchards. Further study will be
necessary to identify the full parasitic guild
of this insect, its temporal synchronicity
with L. occidentalis, and the density of
wasps required to reduce seed bug popula-
tions. Anastatus bifasciatus, which was
introduced into the eastern U.S. to control
gypsy moth in the early 1900’s (Crossman,
1925), may form part of the natural enemy
complex of L. occidentalis in at least some
regions of North America.
We thank Lubomir Masner and Gary
Gibson, Agriculture and Agri-Food Can-
ada, for parasitoid identification, and Chris
Walsh and Ward Strong, B.C. Ministry of
Forests, for allowing us access to
Kalamalka Seed Orchard and providing
advice. We also thank Andrea Battisti,
Universita di Padova, Italy, for helpful
discussion. This research was supported
by the B.C. Ministry of Forests, the Natu-
ral Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada, the Science Council of
B.C., and 21 forest companies.
REFERENCES
Bates, S.L., C.G. Lait, J.H. Borden and A.R. Kermode. 2002. Measuring the impact of Leptoglossus occiden-
talis (Hemiptera: Coreidae) on seed production in lodgepole pine using an antibody-based assay. Journal of
Economic Entomology 95: 770-777.
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Eupelmidae. p. 878-889. In: K.V. Krombein, P.D. Hurd, Jr., D.R.Smith, B.D. Burks
(Eds.) Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico Vol. I, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washing-
ton, D.C.
Camponogara, P., M. Festi, and A. Battisti. 2003. La cimice dei semi americana: unospite indesiderato
delle conifere. Vita in Campagna 2003: 7-8.
Crossman, S.S. 1925. Two imported egg parasites of the gipsy moth Anastatus bifasciatus Fonsc. and Sche-
dius kuwanae Howard. Journal of Agricultural Research 30: 643-675.
Daane, K.M., G.Y. Yokota, K. Weir and S.A. Steffan. 2001. Biological investigations of hemipteran pests to
improve control and reduce the spread of the fungus Botryosphaeria dothidea. Annual Report, Crop Year
2000-2001, California Pistachio Industry, Fresno, CA, p. 1-7.
Gordh, G. 1979. Encyrtidae, p. 890-967. In: K.V. Krombein, P.D. Hurd, Jr., D.R.Smith, B.D. Burks (Eds.)
Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico Vol. I, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington,
D.C.
Hedlin, A.F., H.O. Yates, D.C. Tovar, B.H. Ebel, T.W. Koerber and E.P. Merkel. 1981. Cone and Seed
Insects of North American Conifers. Canadian Forestry Service, USDA Forest Service and Secretaria
de Agricultura y Recursos Hidraulicos, Mexico, 122 p.
Masner, L. 1983. A revision of Gryon Haliday in North America (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea: Scelioni-
dae). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 123-174.
Mitchell, P.L. 1983. Range extensions of Leptoglossus fulvicornis with observations on egg parasitism.
Southwestern Entomologist 8: 150-153.
Strong, W.B., S.L. Bates and M.U. Stoehr. 2001. Feeding by Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann
(Hemiptera: Coreidae) reduces seed set in lodgepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist 133: 857-865.
Yasuda, K. 1990. Ecology of the leaf footed plant bug, Leptoglossus australis Fabricius (Heteroptera:
Coreidae), in the sub-tropical region of Japan. Tropical Agricultural Research Series 23: 229-238.
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
145
SCIENTIFIC NOTE
Evaluation of the antiaggregation pheromone, 3-
methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH), to protect live spruce
from spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
infestation in southern Utah
DARRELL W. ROSS’, GARY E. DATERMAN?
and A. STEVEN MUNSON?
The spruce beetle, Dendroctonus
rufipennis (Kirby), produces the antiaggre-
gation pheromone 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-
l-one (MCH) (Rudinsky et al. 1974).
MCH has reduced the numbers of spruce
beetles attracted to infested logs and syn-
thetic semiochemical lures or reduced
colonization rates throughout the beetles
range (Kline et al. 1974, Rudinsky ef al.
1974, Furniss ef al. 1976, Dyer and Hall
1977, Lindgren ef al. 1989). MCH has not
prevented the infestation of live trees
(Werner and Holsten 1995), with one ex-
ception. MCH in a novel formulation in-
corporating a microinfusion pump pre-
vented the infestation of live spruce in
Alaska in an area with a low spruce beetle
population (Holsten et a/. 2003). The ob-
jective of this study was to test MCH using
commercially available diffusion releasers
for protecting live trees from spruce beetle
infestation in an area with a high spruce
beetle population in southern Utah.
Study plots were located about 20 km
east of Cedar City, Utah (lat. 37°38' N,
long. 112°49' W) at elevations of 3,000 to
3,200 m, in a spruce beetle outbreak area.
Circular, 1-ha plots were located in mixed
stands of mature Engelmann spruce, Picea
engelmanii Parry ex Engelm, and subal-
pine fir, Abies lasiocarpa Nutt. Two treat-
ments (MCH application and untreated
control) were replicated four times in
paired plots. Pairs were about 100 m apart
and replicates were 100-2,000 m apart.
Plots were established on 24 and 25 June
1998 prior to spruce beetle flight. MCH-
treated plots had 180 releasers stapled to
the north side of trees and snags around the
plot perimeter at a height of 2 m. Because
of availability limitations, two different
types of releasers were interspersed evenly
with one another on each plot, 110 of the
releasers were from IPM Technologies,
Inc., Portland, Oregon, (release rate, 9 mg/
day at 22 °C) and the other 70 releasers
were from Phero Tech, Inc., Delta, British
Columbia, Canada, (release rate, 7 mg/day
at 25 °C). A multiple-funnel trap baited
with a lure containing frontalin and a-
pinene in polyvinyl chloride formulations
each releasing 0.8 mg/day at 25 °C was
placed at the center of each plot to monitor
beetle activity. Traps were emptied on 2
and 7 July 1998, and were removed when
successful beetle colonization on trees
within the plots was first observed. The
basal area of all trees >20 cm diameter at
breast height (dbh) was measured at 30 m
from the plot center in the four cardinal
directions and recorded by species. Per-
cent spruce basal area was calculated.
Plots were surveyed on 17 September 1998
after beetle flight had ended to determine
the dbh and infestation status of all spruce
>20 cm dbh. Trees were classified as
mass-attacked or unattacked based on the
presence or absence of large amounts of
boring dust on the lower third of the bole.
Percentage of spruce trees >20 cm dbh that
were mass-attacked was calculated for
each plot.
Paired t-tests were used to test for
treatment differences in the total numbers
' Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
“USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331
7 USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, 4746 South 1900 East, Ogden, UT 84403
146 J. ENTOMOL. SOc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
of spruce beetles caught in the traps and in
the tree and stand data. Percentages of
spruce trees mass-attacked were arcsin
square root transformed. Nontransformed
means are reported.
There was no significant difference in
spruce beetle catches between MCH-
treated and untreated plots (P = 0.7430).
The average (+ SE) number of spruce bee-
tles caught in traps on MCH-treated plots
was 546 + 293 and the average caught in
traps on controls was 473 + 245. As ex-
pected, there were no significant differ-
ences between treatments for basal area (P
= 0.2113), percent of total basal area (P =
0.9409), tree density (P = 0.6715), or dbh
(P = 0.4592), since plots were selected to
be similar with respect to stand structure
and composition. Furthermore, the percent
of spruce >20 cm dbh that were mass-
attacked by the spruce beetle was not sig-
nificantly different on MCH-treated (52.7
+ 20.3%) and untreated plots (68.3 +
15.3%) (P = 0.4262). The majority, if not
all, of the colonized trees were heavily
infested.
The application rate of MCH used in
this study was more than twice the current
recommended dose for the Douglas-fir
beetle (Ross et a/. 2001). Despite the high
application rate, MCH was not effective in
preventing host-tree infestation by the
high-density spruce beetle population. The
lack of a significant effect of MCH might
have been related to release rates of the
compound under field conditions or to the
lack of a behavioral response of the species
to the compound. A recent study demon-
strated that spruce beetle host selection
behavior changes with population density
(Wallin and Raffa 2004) and this could
explain the different responses to MCH
that have been observed in field studies.
Further study will be needed to determine
the conditions under which MCH might be
operationally feasible for protecting live
spruce.
We thank Ron Wilson, Phil Eisenhauer,
and Lucy Wilkins of the Dixie National
Forest and Tom Henry, Steve Robinson,
and Rachael Turnbaugh of Cedar Breaks
National Monument for providing assis-
tance and access to the study sites. The
work upon which this publication 1s based
was funded in whole or in part through a
grant awarded by the Northeastern Area
State and Private Forestry, USDA Forest
Service.
REFERENCES
Dyer, E.D.A. and P.M. Hall. 1977. Effect of anti-aggregative pheromones 3,2-MCH and trans-verbenol
on Dendroctonus rufipennis attacks on spruce stumps. Journal of the Entomological Society of British
Columbia 74: 32-34.
Furniss, M.M., B.H. Baker, and B.B. Hostetler.
1976. Aggregation of spruce beetles (Coleoptera) to
seudenol and repression of attraction by methylcyclohexenone in Alaska. The Canadian Entomologist
108: 1297-1302.
Holsten E.H., P.J. Shea, and R.R. Borys. 2003. MCH released in a novel pheromone dispenser prevents
spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), attacks in south-central Alaska.
Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 31-34.
Kline, L.N., R.F. Schmitz, J.A. Rudinsky, and M.M. Furniss.
1974. Repression of spruce beetle
(Coleoptera) attraction by methylcyclohexenone in Idaho. The Canadian Entomologist 106: 485-491.
Lindgren, B.S., M.D. McGregor, R.D. Oakes, and H.E. Meyer. 1989. Suppression of spruce beetle at-
tacks by MCH released from bubble caps. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 4: 49-52.
Ross, D.W., K.E. Gibson, and G.E. Daterman. 2001. Using MCH to protect trees and stands from Doug-
las-fir beetle infestation. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service FHTET-2001-09.
Rudinsky, J.A., C. Sartwell Jr., T.M. Graves, and M.E. Morgan. 1974. Granular formulation of methyl-
cyclohexenone: an antiaggregative pheromone of the Douglas-fir and spruce bark beetles (Col., Scoly-
tidae). Zeitschrift fiir angewandte Entomologie 75: 254-263.
Wallin, K.F. and K.F. Raffa. 2004. Feedback between individual host selection behavior and population
dynamics in an eruptive herbivore. Ecological Monographs 74: 101-116.
Werner, R.A. and E.H. Holsten. 1995. Current status of research with the spruce beetle, Dendroctonus
rufipennis, pp. 23-29. In: S.M. Salom and K.R. Hobson (tech. eds.). Application of semiochemicals
for management of bark beetle infestations — Proceedings of an informal conference. U.S. Department
of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report INT-GTR-318
J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
147
SCIENTIFIC NOTE
New waterboatmen records for Western Canada
(Hemiptera: Corixidae)
R.D. KENNER! and K.M. NEEDHAM!
ABSTRACT— Trichocorixa verticalis (Fieber) is reported for the first time from the
mainland of British Columbia and the subspecific assignment is discussed. Based on
specimens in the Spencer Entomological Museum, one provincial record and one territo-
rial record are added to the recent checklist of Canadian Hemiptera.
During recent collecting trips in the
Lower Mainland of British Columbia
(BC), Canada, we found a population (both
immatures and adults) of Trichocorixa
verticalis (Fieber). Previously, T. verticalis
was known in BC only from three island
localities: two on Vancouver Island and
one on Thetis Island (Scudder 1977). A
fourth island record can be added to these:
Prevost Island, salt marsh _ pond,
10.v11.1986, J.D. Reynolds, 1 male, 2 fe-
males, Spencer Entomological Museum.
Outside of BC, Trichocorixa verticalis
has a widespread distribution. Two subspe-
cies occur on each of the east and west
coasts of North America with a fifth sub-
species broadly distributed through the
central plains (Sailer 1976). The subspe-
cies T. v. californica Sailer was described
based on specimens from central Califor-
nia (Sailer 1976) and its known distribu-
tion was subsequently extended north
through Oregon and Washington
(Stonedahl & Lattin 1986). All previous
BC records have been attributed to this
subspecies (Scudder 1977). Trichocorixa
verticalis californica is listed as potentially
rare or endangered in British Columbia
(Scudder 1994) and is considered a species
of special concern in the Georgia Depres-
sion Region (Scudder 1996).
The mainland Trichocorixa specimens
were collected in Delta, south of Vancou-
ver, from a ditch on the north side of Del-
taport Way in early October 2003 and
again in late May 2004. The ditch runs
inland from the coast and connects at its
coastal end to a second ditch that runs par-
allel to and just inland of the coastal dike.
In the October survey, semi-quantitative
data were collected between 1.3 km and
3.7 km inland from the dike. The density
of T. verticalis was found to drop sharply
beyond 1.8 km and no specimens were
collected more than 2.2 km from the dike.
In May, we extended the surveyed area to
the coastal dike; 7. verticalis was found at
all sites between 0 and 1.3 km inland.
While the assignment of the Delta
specimens to 7. verticalis was straightfor-
ward, the subspecific assignment was not.
In his key to subspecies of T. verticalis,
Sailer (1976) deals separately with female
and male specimens. Based on those keys,
our female specimens are 7. v. californica
but our male specimens are T. v. verticalis
(Fieber). The range for T. v. verticalis ex-
tends along the coast from Maine to Mex-
ico and includes the West Indies (Sailer
1976). In Sailer’s key, a critical character
for males is the ratio of the length of the
closest separation of the eyes (IO) to the
length of the hind margin of the eye (L,).
In T. v. californica the ratio is greater than
or equal to one; the ratio is less than one in
T. v. verticalis. In our specimens, IO:L, is
less than one. In order to check Sailer’s
key, this ratio was measured for two male
paratypes of T. v. californica (CA, San
Mateo Co., Moss Beach, 4.vu1.1929, R.L.
Usinger) and for two male specimens of 7.
v. verticalis (Bermuda Island, Spittal Pond,
10.vi11.1940, G. Kelly); all four specimens
are in the Essig Museum at the University
"Spencer Entomological Museum, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
BC V6T 1Z4
148 J. ENTOMOL. SOC. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
of California Berkeley. These four speci-
mens fulfill Sailer’s criteria.
In a further effort to identify our speci-
mens, we examined the left and night
claspers from one of the male specimens.
Comparison of these claspers with the
drawings for the various species of Tricho-
corixa in Sailer (1976) showed the best
agreement between our specimen and 7.
verticalis. However, within the subspecies
of T. verticalis, the claspers of our speci-
men are in poorest agreement with those
shown for T. v. californica; they are in
much better agreement with those of the
three more easterly subspecies.
We rechecked the identification of all
of the BC Trichocorixa specimens in the
Spencer Entomological Museum (three
localities with a total of two males, five
females and one immature). The five fe-
male specimens key out to T. v. califor-
nica. One of the males is teneral and is
partially collapsed; it cannot be run
through the key. The second male is dam-
aged but the ratio of IO: L. can be meas-
ured and is less than one, in agreement
with the Delta specimens. Thus at least one
of the male Trichocorixa specimens previ-
ously collected in BC also does not fit
Sailer’s description of 7. v. californica. It
is unclear whether the definition of 7. v.
californica needs to be broadened to ac-
count for the geographical variation repre-
sented by the BC specimens or if the BC
specimens belong to a different subspecies.
A re-examination of the whole question of
subspecific designations for 7. verticalis is
needed. In view of the uncertainty in as-
signing subspecies to the BC specimens,
we prefer to leave the determination as
simply T. verticalis.
‘In addition to T. verticalis, we collected
four other species of corixids from the
ditch in Delta: Cenocorixa _ blaisdelli
(Hungerford), Corisella inscripta (Uhler),
Hesperocorixa atopodonta (Hungerford)
and Sigara omani (Hungerford). Ceno-
corixa blaisdelli is listed as potentially rare
or endangered in_ British Columbia
(Scudder 1994) and Corisella inscripta is
listed as rare or very local in occurrence in
Canada (Maw ef al. 2000). These records
highlight the importance of surveying
these often overlooked habitats. Voucher
specimens for all of these records are in the
Spencer Entomological Museum.
Examination of the corixids in the col-
lection at UBC showed that two entries
were omitted from the recent Checklist of
Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska (Maw et
al. 2000), one each for BC and NT, based
on the following’ records:
Hesperocorixa minorella (Hungerford):
BC, Banks Is., Kooryet Bay, sphagnum
bog, 11.vi1.1986, G.G.E. Scudder, 1 male,
4 females; BC, Diana L., sphagnum bog,
14.vi1.1986, G.G.E. Scudder, 2 males.
Sigara lineata (Forster): NT, Hay R.,
Mackenzie Hwy., 20.v11.1961, T.G. North-
cote, 1 male, 2 females.
We thank G.G.E. Scudder for useful
discussions. RDK thanks Cheryl Barr for
her hospitality and access to the specimens
in the Essig Museum.
REFERENCES
Maw, H.E.L., R.G. Foottit, K.G.A. Hamilton and G.G.E. Scudder. 2000. Checklist of the Hemiptera of
Canada and Alaska. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sailer, R.I. 1976. The Genus Trichocorixa (Corixidae, Hemiptera). pp. 289-407 in: H.B. Hungerford. The
Corixidae of the Western Hemisphere. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 32.
Scudder, G.G.E. 1977. An annotated checklist of the aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera (Insecta) of Brit-
ish Columbia. Syesis 10: 31-38.
Scudder, G.G.E. 1994. An annotated systematic list of the potentially rare and endangered freshwater and
terrestrial invertebrates in British Columbia. Entomological Society of British Columbia, Occasional
Paper 2, April 1994.
Scudder, G.G.E. 1996. Terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates of British Columbia: priorities for inven-
tory and descriptive research. Research Branch, BC Ministry of Forests, and Wildlife Branch, BC
Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Victoria, BC, Working Paper 09/1996.
Stonedahl, G.M. and J.D. Lattin. 1986. The Corixidae of Oregon and Washington (Hemiptera: Heterop-
tera). Agricultural Experimental Station, Technical Bulletin 150, Oregon State University Press, Cor-
vallis, Oregon.
J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
149
SCIENTIFIC NOTE
Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae:
Polistinae) in British Columbia: first collection records
of an invasive European paper wasp in Canada
CHRISTOPHER J. BORKENT' and ROBERT A. CANNINGS?
Two species of the cosmopolitan genus
Polistes (paper wasps), P. fuscatus
(Fabricius) and P. aurifer Saussure, are
native to British Columbia (Carpenter
1996), although some entomologists con-
sider P. aurifer a subspecies of P. fuscatus
(Kenner 2002). These wasps are frequently
confused with yellowjacket species
(Vespinae) but are easily distinguished by
their thread waist, their habit of trailing
their legs in flight, and their nests of ex-
posed cells. They frequently nest on man-
made structures.
The European paper wasp, P. dominu-
lus (Christ) (Fig. 1), native to Europe, Asia
and North Africa, has been introduced into
the USA, Australia and Chile (Carpenter
1996). It was first recorded in the USA
from Massachusetts in the late 1970s
(Eickwort 1978) and its range has since
expanded south and west, covering most of
the northeastern states (Judd and Carpenter
1996, Pickett and Wenzel 2000, Gamboa et
al. 2004, Johnson and Starks 2004). It has
also moved north to Kingston (sighted in
2002) and Sandfield (2004), Ontario (H.
Goulet, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada,
pers. comm.), but apparently no specimens
have been collected in eastern Canada.
Polistes dominulus has recently appeared
in the western USA from Washington to
California and east to Colorado (Landolt
and Antonelli 1999, Pickett 2003). It is not
clear if these populations are the result of
new introductions, possibly from Asia, or
of a western expansion of eastern introduc-
tions (Johnson and Starks 2004).
In British Columbia, P. dominulus was
first recorded in late August 2003, when D.
Manastryski (3808 Rowland Dr. Victoria,
BC) photographed a nest (identified by H.
Goulet) in Saanich. No specimens were
collected, but the photograph was _ pub-
lished on the back cover of the Entomo-
logical Society of Canada 2003 meeting
program. On 5 September 2004, while
walking along the shore of Shuswap Lake
in Salmon Arm, the first author found a
pre-hibernation cluster of about 25 unusual
wasps under an overhang on a wooden
signpost. One was collected and identified
as P. dominulus. Art Borkent (Royal BC
Museum, Victoria, BC) collected 10 wasps
from the same cluster on 20 September
2004. There was no nest or nest-building
activity; this late-season aggregation be-
haviour has been previously reported for
the species (Landolt and Antonelli 1999).
On 30 September 2004, a P. dominulus
nest was collected from a nail protruding
from the eaves of a house in Saanich, BC.
The nest had three female wasps on its
surface (Fig. 1) and 17 between the eaves
and the back of the nest. The wasps may
have congregated for warmth; the tempera-
ture was 7 °C (2130 PDT). The nest held
206 cells, six of which contained larvae in
various stages of development. A few
other cells were less than a third filled with
nectar. This cell number falls well within
the range documented for the species by
Pickett and Wenzel (2000). None of the
specimens collected at either site showed
signs of Strepsiptera parasitism. Voucher
specimens from both localities are depos-
ited at the Royal BC Museum, Victoria,
BC, and the Canadian National Collection
of Insects, Ottawa, Ontario.
Polistes dominulus is_ distinguished
from the native P. aurifer and P. fuscatus
Corresponding author: 2396 Estevan Ave., Victoria, BC, V8R 2S5; email: cborkent@alumni.uvic.ca
Royal BC Museum, 675 Belleville St., Victoria, BC, V8W 9W2
150 J. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 101, DECEMBER 2004
by the yellow patterns on the thorax (Fig.
2). Polistes dominulus individuals are usu-
ally the size of yellowjacket wasps, mak-
ing them smaller than native species.
Although P. dominulus is clearly ex-
panding its range, the effect of this inva-
sion on native species is not as easily de-
termined (Pickett and Wenzel 2000, John-
son and Starks 2004). The recent appear-
ance of P. dominulus in BC provides an
opportunity to measure its effect on native
crease in abundance within its new BC
range, resulting in many more observations
in and around human dwellings, where it
prefers to nest.
‘We thank D. Manastryski, A. Borkent
and H. Goulet for their help in collection
and discussion of P. dominulus. The manu-
script was improved by comments from J.
Carpenter and an anonymous reviewer.
This study was supported in part by funds
from the Royal BC Museum.
me oe
Polistes populations. Probably it will in-
‘ sat be 2 a ‘i
: i # wo: Sete: i hy he
“aN b. =. ao,
at a nest in Saanich, BC, 30 September 2004.
ie
Figure 1. Females of Polistes dominulus
Reset eas
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of the thorax of Polistes aurifer or P. fuscatus (left)
and P. dominulus (right), showing differences in size and markings (white areas = yellow).
Gray areas represent wings. Scale line = 1 mm.
REFERENCES
Eickwort, G.C. 1978. Polistes dominulus discovered near Boston. Polistine Information Bulletin Newslet-
ter.
Gamboa, G.J., M.A. Noble, M.C. Thom, J.L. Togal, R. Srinivasan and B.D. Murphy. 2004. The compara-
tive biology of two sympatric paper wasps in Michigan, the native Polistes fuscatus and the invasive
Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insectes Sociaux 51:153-157.
Johnson, R.N. and P.T. Starks. 2004. A surprising level of genetic diversity in an invasive wasp: Polistes
dominulus in the northeastern United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 732-
pie
Judd, T.M. and J.M. Carpenter. 1996. Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) found in Michigan.
Great Lakes Entomologist 29: 45-46.
Kenner, R. 2002. Stvlops shannoni (Stylopidae, Strepsiptera): A new species for Canada, with comments
on Xenos peckii. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 99: 99-102.
Landolt, P.J. and A. Antonelli. 1999. The Paper wasp Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespi-
dae) in the state of Washington. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 75: 58-59.
Pickett, K.M. 2003. Evolution of transitional forms: behavior, colony dynamics, and phylogenetics of
social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Pickett, K.M. and J.W. Wenzel. 2000. High productivity in haplometrotic colonies of the introduced Paper
wasp Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Polistinae). Journal of the New York Entomologi-
cal Society 108: 314-325.
NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS
Manuscripts dealing with all facets of the study of arthropods will be considered for publication
provided the content is of regional origin, interest, or application. Authors need not be members
of the Society. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed, a process that takes about 6 weeks.
Submissions. Manuscripts should be typed double-spaced and single-sided, leaving generous
margins, with numbered lines and pages. Tables and figures should be on separate, numbered
pages. Figure captions should be placed together, preceding the figures. Figure lines should be
sufficiently thick and lettering sufficiently large so that they are clear when reduced to fit on the
Journal page, 12.9 x 20.5 cm.
Electronic Submissions are preferred, as they greatly speed and simplify the review and
proofing process. Submit the manuscript in MS Word or Wordperfect format, along with a
cover letter, as an e-mail attachment to the Editor. PostScript and Acrobat formats are not ac-
ceptable. Figures should be submitted as separate files. Preferred graphic formats are GIF and
JPG at 600 dpi. Photos and half-tone illustrations can be scanned at high resolution (600 DPI) or
hard copies can be sent to the Editor.
Hardcopy Submissions can be used if access to electronic facilities is limited. Send three
copies and a covering letter to the Editor.
Submit contributions to:
Dr. Ward Strong, Editor ward.strong@gems/7.gov.bc.ca
Kalamalka Forestry Centre
3401 Reservoir Road Phone (250) 549-5696
Vernon, BC _V1B 2C7 Fax (250) 542-2230
Style and format. Consult Volume 100 for style and format. Style generally conforms to the
Entomological Society of America Style Guide, available at http://www.entsoc.org/Pubs/
PUBLISH/esa_publish.htm. The Style Manual for Biological Journals published by the Ameri-
can Institute of Biological Sciences should be consulted if there is no precedent. Titles of jour-
nals must be cited in full in the References.
Scientific Notes are an acceptable format for short reports. They must be two Journal pages
maximum, and do not use traditional section headings. The term "Scientific Note" precedes the
title. A short abstract may be included if desired. Notes are peer-reviewed just as regular sub-
missions are.
Page charges. The Society has no support apart from subscriptions. The page charge for
articles is $35 and includes all tables and figures except coloured illustrations. The page charge
is $40 if none of the authors is a member of the ESBC. A surcharge for coloured illustrations
applies.
Page charge waiver. Authors whose entomological activities are not supported by universi-
ties or official institutions, who are unable to pay page charges from their personal funds, may
apply for assistance when submitting a manuscript.
Reprints. The Society no longer provides reprints to authors, but provides an Adobe Acrobat
file with an exact copy of the paper as it appears in the Journal. This file will also be posted on
the ESBC Website (http://esbc.harbour.com/index.html) to provide free electronic access to our
Journal for all interested parties. Authors can respond to reprint requests by directing the re-
quester to the Website, sending the Acrobat file electronically, or printing and sending a hard-
copy.
Back issues. Back issues of most volumes of the Journal are available at $15 each.
Membership in the Society is open to anyone with an interest in entomology. Dues are $20 per
year; $10 for students. Members receive the Journal, Boreus (the Newsletter of the Society), and
when published, Occasional Papers.
Address inquiries to:
Dr. Robb Bennett, Secretary robb.bennett@gems6.gov.bc.ca
B.C. Ministry of Forests
7380 Puckle Road Phone (250) 652-6593
Saanichton, BC V8M 1W4 Fax (250) 652-4204
MITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARIE
scacucuory, WINIILIUNDI
Entomological hocks of British. Columbia
HNN
Volume 101 Issued December 2004 ISSN #0071-0733 |
Directors of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 2004-2005
| Gary J.R. Judd and Mark G.T. Gardiner. Simultaneous disruption of pheromone communication and mating in
Cydia pomonella, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis limitata Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) using Isomate-
CM/LR in apple orchards
Heather L. McBrien and Gary J.R. Judd. Emergence of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocel-
lana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in relation to temperature and apple tree phenology at Summerland, British Colum-
Gary J.R. Judd, Mark G.T. Gardiner and Howard M.A. Thistlewood. Seasonal variation in recapture of mass-reared
sterile codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): implications for control by sterile
insect technique in British Columbia
A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl and Propyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoates in Codling Moth Management: Improved
Monitoring in Bartlett Pear with High Dose Lures
| A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl] (£, Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth Management: Stimulation of Ovi-
position
A.L. Knight and D.M. Light. Use of Ethyl (£,Z)-2,4-decadienoate in Codling Moth Management: Kairomone Species
Specificity
A.L. Knight. Managing Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with an Internal Grid of Either Aerosol Puffers or
Dispenser Clusters Plus Border Applications of Individual Dispensers
| A.L. Knight and T.E. Larsen. Improved Deposition and Performance of a Microencapsulated Sex Pheromone Formula-
tion for Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with a Low Volume Application
J.E. Cossentine and L.B.M. Jensen. Persistence of a commercial codling moth granulovirus product on apple fruit and
foliage
| R.F. Smith, J.E. Cossentine, S.M. Rigby and C.S. Sheffield. Species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in or-
ganic apple orchards of British Columbia
David R. Horton. Phenology of emergence from artificial overwintering shelters by some predatory arthropods common
in pear orchards of the Pacific Northwest 101-108
Kevin J. Dodds and Darrell W. Ross. Douglas-fir beetle lipid levels in relation to tree physical characteristics
109-116
John H. Borden, Deepa S. Pureswaran and Lisa M. Poirier. Evaluation of two repellent semiochemicals for disruption
of attack by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) 117-124
G.G.E. Scudder. Heteroptera (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha) New to Canada. Part 2 125-130
John P. Simaika and Robert A. Cannings. Lestes disjunctus Selys and L. forcipatus Rambur (Odonata: Lestidae): Some
Solutions for Identification 131-140
SCIENTIFIC NOTES
R.S. Vernon. A ground-based pheromone trap for monitoring Agriotes lineatus and A. obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae)
141-142
Sarah L. Bates and John H. Borden. Parasitoids of Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann (Heteroptera: Coreidae) in British
Columbia 143-144
Darrell W. Ross, Gary E. Daterman and A. Steven Munson. Evaluation of the antiaggregation pheromone, 3-
methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH), to protect live spruce from spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation
in southern Utah 145-146
R.D. Kenner and K.M. Needham. New waterboatmen records for Western Canada (Hemiptera: Corixidae) 147-148
Christopher J. Borkent and Robert A. Cannings. Polistes dominulus (Christ) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae) in
British Columbia: first collection records of an invasive European paper wasp in Canada 149-150
| NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS