HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Ernst Mayr Library
of the Museum of
Comparative Zoology
i»«!N{3Ti.iN
fitY Oh Sf.5
MCZ
LfBR/^Ry
27 200§
^^IVEFfQlJ-y
MCZ
UBRARY
APR I 7 2007
Journal of the
I .t^ARVARD
UNIVERSITY
Volume 93
Number 1
Spring 2007
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Contents
Editor’s Comments i
Instructions To Authors ii
Sethanne Howard, Science Has No Gender ..1
Yasmin H. Said, On the Eras in the History of Statistics and Data Analysis 17
R. Allen Gardner Review of Sign Language Studies of Cross Fostered Chimpanzees 37
Onoufrios Pavlogiannis, Constantine Lomi, Evangelos Albanidis, Spiros Konitslotis, and
Stephanos Geroulanos, Sport and Medicine During Greek Antiquity and Roman Imperial Times
News Of Members 76
Affiliated Institutions 78
ISSN 0043-0439
Issued Quarterly at Washington DC
^^asfljington ilcabcmp of ^ctcntejf
Founded in 1898
Board of Managers
Elected Officers
President
William Boyer
President Elect
Alain Towaide
Treasurer
Harvey Freeman
Secretary
James Cole
Vice President, Administration
Rex Klopfenstein
Vice President, Membership
Thomas Meylan
Vice President, Junior Academy
Paul L. Kazan
Vice President, Affiliated Societies
Mark Holland
Members at Large
Sethanne Howard
Donna Dean
Frank Haig, S J.
Jodi Wesemann
Vary Coates
Peg Kay
The Journal of the Washington Academy of
Sciences
The Journal is the official organ of the Academy.
It publishes articles on science policy, the history of
science, critical reviews, original science research,
proceedings of scholarly meetings of its Affiliated
Societies, and other items of interest to its members.
It is published quarterly. The last issue of the year
contains a directory of the current membership of
the Academy.
Subscription Rates
Members, fellows, and life members in good
standing receive the Journal free of charge.
Subscriptions are available on a calendar year basis,
payable in advance. Payment must be made in U.S.
currency at the following rates.
US and Canada $25.00
Other Countries 30.00
Single Copies (when available) 10.00
Claims for Missing Issues
Claims must be received within 65 days of mailing.
Claims will not be allowed if non-delivery was the
result of failure to notify the Academy of a change
of address.
Past President: F. Douglas Witherspoon
Notification of Change of Address
AFFILIATED SOCIETY DELEGATES: Address changes should be sent promptly to the
Shown on back cover
Academy Office. Notification should contain both
old and new addresses and zip codes.
Editor of the Journal
Vary T. Coates
Associate Editors;
Alain Touwaide
Sethanne Howard
Elizabeth Corona
Academy Office
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 63 1
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202/326-8975
email: was@washacadsci.org
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to WAS, Rm.631,
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20005
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
(ISSN 0043-0439)
Published by the Washington Academy of Sciences
202/326-8975
website: www.washacadsci.org
I
THE EDITOR COMMENTS
, M C2
APR 1 7
2007
ALL MUST ADMIT THAT THE ACADEMY Stays well ahead of the
times! Last May our Annual Award for Excellence in the Physical
Sciences went to Dr. John C. Mather; five months later the Nobel Awards
Committee followed suit. In 2005 we held the first of several conferences
discussing the challenges of establishing a permanent base on the Moon;
in 2006 President Bush espoused that as a national goal. But in our last
issue we outdid ourselves — the cover of the Journal bore the date Winter
2007, although the inside pages had the correct legend: Winter 2006. This
perhaps bothered only Librarians, and subscribers who systematically
shelve their periodicals; they would find only three quarterly issues for
2006, and eventually five for 2007. We would love to know how many of
our readers noticed this bit of prematurity.
THE STEADY EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE rather
than such leaps into the future, is however the common theme in this
issue. Dr. Howard, drawing on her new book. The Hidden Giants, tells of
some of the under-celebrated contributions of women scientists over 4000
years of history. Yasmin Said lays out the much shorter history of
statistics, and how it has become an essential component of all modem
sciences. In an electrifying account. Dr. Allen Gardner recapitulates long-
running behavioral science experiments in which infant chimpanzees were
raised surrounded by the use of American Sign Language. Finally,
returning to Antiquity, Onoufrios Pavlogiannis and colleagues from
several universities in Greece discusses the common origin and
gradual divergence of medicine and gymnastics.
WE ARE ALWAYS HAPPY TO RECEIVE contributions from
scientists in Italy, Greece, and many other countries, but we remind
our readers that a primary purpose of this Journal is to showcase the
work of scientists, engineers, and teachers in our own region; so once
again we encourage you to send us reports of your research and
related activities.
Spring 2007
11
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
THE JOURNAL of the Washington Academy of Sciences is a peer-
reviewed journal. Exceptions are made for papers requested by the editors
or positively approved for presentation or publication by one of our
affiliated scientific societies.
We welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientific research reports
and papers on technology development and innovation, science policy,
technology assessment, and history of science and technology. Book
reviews are also welcome.
Contributors of papers are requested to follow these guidelines carefully.
• Papers should be submitted as e-mail attacliments to the cliief editor,
vcoates r/iinac.com, along with full contact infonnation for the primary^ or
corresponding author.
• Papers should be presented in Word: do not send PDF files.
• Papers should be 6000 words or fewer. If more than 6 graphics are included tlie
number of words allowed will be reduced accordingly.
• Grapliics must be in black and wliite only. They must be easily resized and
relocated. It is best to put grapliics, including tables, at the end of the paper or in
a separate document, with their preferred location in the text clearly indicated.
• References should be in tlie fonn of endnotes, and may be in any style
considered standard in the discipline(s) represented by tlie paper.
Washington Academy of Sciences
1
SCIENCE HAS NO GENDER
The History of Women in Science
Sethanne Howard
Retired, US Naval Observatory
Abstract
Science is a traditional role for women. For over 4,000 years of written
liistorv women liave participated in tliis great human adventure.
Science and teclmology are neitlier new nor difficult for women any
more than they are for men. The stories of many of our scientists do not
fonn part of our instruction in science from kindergarten tlirough
college. Missing from our textbooks and data are tlie fundamental
contributions of scientists, both male and female, but especially female.
Female creativity and genius fill our teclmical past. The stories of tliese
women not only provide role models for future scientists, but they also
strengthen and broaden our ability^ to deal with tlie present. There is
now an Internet site w w w . astr. ua. edij/4()0() ws devoted to tlie
participation and success of women in the teclmical liistorv' of
humanity'. Tliis site is now used by school systems world wide as a
student resource.
Introduction
For as long as we have been human we have developed and
used technology and science. For as long as we have been human we have
looked forward to the next challenge, the next goal, the next creative
thought. One of the defining marks of humanity is our ability to affect and
predict our environment. Science — the definition of structure for our
world, technology — the use of structure in our world, and mathematics
— the common language of structure — have all been part of our human
progress, through every step of our path to the present. Women and men
together have researched and solved each emerging need. Women and
men together have defined the advancing path of these three fundamental
human activities. Women and men together have eased the burden for all
of us. Science is adventure, a trip that uncovers beauty everywhere with
every new thing understood. Eveiyorie deserves to share in this excitement
and personal fulfillment.
Spring 2007
2
The Women Are Important
Women are important in the history of science. The name of a
technical woman appears in some of world’s earliest literature — over
4,000 years ago.^ Science has been the business of women ever since then.
Certainly women were questioners and thinkers long before that. Most
myths and religions place the beginnings of agriculture, laws, civilization,
mathematics, calendars, time keeping, and medicine into the hands of
women. The mythology is so very rich. The stories form our common
wealth. But whether it was the Goddess of Wisdom or War or Love, she is
lost to the historical record, yet kept strong in the dreams and myths of all
peoples.
So who was this first woman in a long line of thinkers? She is
En’Hedu’anna (c. 2354 BCE), daughter of Sargon the conqueror. And
with her the written tradition of women in science and technology begins.
“En” is the title of leadership in Sumerian. “Hedu’anna” means “ornament
of heaven” — the name given to her when she was installed as en-
priestess (the chief or leader). We do not know her birth name. She was
the chief astronomer-priestess and, as such, managed the great temple
complex of her city of Ur. Ur may have been the largest city of the ancient
world during and after her tenure. Although we do not have precise
technical works from her we know that she was a learned, diversely
talented woman of power. The Sumerian temple complex under her
guidance controlled the economic wealth and distribution of the city as
well as its rich intellectual life. For example, the extensive astronomical
observatories in Sumer managed by the en-priestess and her colleagues
produced some of the earliest astronomical records, and it is from there
that we gained use of the concept of base 60 — e.g., 60 degrees in a circle.
And we have her poems. She is the world’s first named poet. Her poems
are still available in English translation. In one of her poems she
mentioned the lunar tracking done in the gi-par — the place where she
lived. We also have an alabaster disk that shows her in a religious
procession (see Figure 1). She is the first woman of power and scholarship
whose name we know, and the last in a long line of unknown powerful
women who followed the stars and the cycles of the Moon.
Washington Academy of Sciences
3
FIGURE 1 - Restored alabaster disk showing En’Hedu’anna in
procession. She is the third from the right. Courtesy, University Museum,
Philadelphia
Dr. Gerda Lerner said in her address as the incoming president of
the Organization of American Historians:^
'\..AU women have hi common that their history comes to
them refracted through the lens of men 's observations and
refracted again through a male-centered value system....
From that time on [the beginning of written history]
women were educationally deprived and did not
significantly participate in the creation of the symbol
system by which the world was explained and ordered.
Women did not name themselves; they did not, after the
Neolithic era, name gods or shape them in their image.... If
the bringing of women — half the human race — into the
center of historical inquhy poses a formidable challenge to
historical scholarship, it also offers sustaining energy and
a source ofsmength. ”
“(O)ffers sustaining energy and a source of strength” is a
wonderful phrase. We shall find remarkable energy and strength in the
names we can dig out, albeit with difficulty, of the records. Our search
began with En’Hedu’anna whose beacon still shines through the
millennia. Where do we go next?
Women hold up half the sky. This is a saying native to many of the
world’s cultures. Yet the information about the traditional role of women
Spring 2007
4
in science and technology is not easily available. A book on women in
science written in 1913 (Woman in Science, H. J. Mozans)^ lists over 350
technical women of the past. This book is an amazing tour de force
combining romantic views of women with hard references to original
sources. Asimov’s book (Biogjaphical Encyclopedia of Science and
Technology^), some 50 years later, lists sixteen women. Patrick Moore's
book Men of the Stars^, a mere decade after Asimov’s book, has none.
This is a disappointing trend. One would have hoped the women of the
past would remain in the history books.
The past decade has produced a large list of publications about
technical women of the near past. The 20^*^ century is covered rather well;
however, it is misleading to assume that women were not scholars before
the 20^*^ century just because their names are missing from the history
texts. Their absence is involuntary — a result of how history was
compiled, as Dr. Lemer so eloquently said. These women contributed
much. They had the entire universe to play with, to study, and to enjoy.
They were not left out of this great human experience. To help bring them
back into the mainstream, there is a web site dedicated to many of the
technical women of the past: www.astr.ua.edu/40QQws. I maintain this
web site as a resource for schools.
Women contributed in all ways to the technical advancement of
humanity. They held the same burdens of scholarship as the men held.
There are many names of technical women from our past; women whose
names and deeds are rarely heard, women of a philosophical bent, women
who made a difference in the world. Before I give a small sample of these
wonderful women who we now know are important, let me discuss briefly
why science too is important.
The Science Is Important
Science and technology are important. Why? Not only because of
their intrinsic merit but also because our nation is at risk. Despite the
standards provided by the National Academy of Sciences and National
Academy of Engineering, a large percentage of high-school science and
mathematics teachers lack an undergraduate or graduate major in a
technical discipline or science education. Not only are they poorly
prepared in the technical aspects of science and engineering, they are also
ignorant of the history and social nature of science, mathematics, and
Washington Academy of Sciences
5
engineering. What does this lack of teacher training lead to? It leads to
students ill prepared to carry forward our civilization.
To most of us, high academic standards have become the last, best
hope for saving America's schools. The reform landscape is crowded with
projects, initiatives, centers, institutes, partnerships, and more. The most
promising of these to emerge over the past decade or so share two
common concerns: improving the quality of science and mathematics
education and increasing the accessibility of science and mathematics
education to students who had not participated previously.
Although things are improving, the notion that excellence is ‘not
for girls’ (or minorities) persists. It is vital that teachers know what
women have done, how they have contributed. Science and technology are
innately diverse. We need role models that highlight and celebrate this
diversity. So science is important; women are important; we must make
women of science as important as men of science.
Search Out The Women
Let us bring the women out of obscurity and put them into the
center of history and science. Where do we look? We must look just about
everywhere. One finds these women in many of the same places as one
finds the men who were scholars. Scholarship is the key word, not science.
The word ‘scientist’ is rather new, coined around 1840^. This word
“scientisf’ has a very broad definition and includes the expected definition
— someone with a Ph.D. who works in a technical field. A person with a
Ph.D. studies a narrowly defined field of research and often is well trained
in only that field. We must also include engineers, inventors, physicians,
nurses, natural philosophers (scholars), and people with technical degrees.
So as we look, we cannot limit ourselves to Ph.D.’s, especially since
women were excluded from many universities and most graduate science
programs.
Before schools trained scientists, learned people were either self-
taught or privately taught. They were the natural philosophers whose
endeavors typically covered the classic seven liberal arts — grammar,
rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy. To find these
scholars we look for those holders of scholarly degrees, and for poets and
authors, architects, and gardeners; we look in industry, in school lists, in
textbooks, letters, and stories. The names of scholars may be deduced out
Spring 2007
6
of their poems, music, and writings. A literate person perforce meant a
numerate person.
Science, on the other hand, has been around for as long as we have
been human. Today, science has split into many pieces: e.g., astronomy,
mathematics, physics, biology, chemistry, meteorology, geology, and the
social sciences, all in various combinations. Two of these pieces, however,
stayed intact as far back as one wishes to go — astronomy and
mathematics. Before humanity invented writing we find astronomical
based calendar stones and engravings. There are stones, lists, clay,
carvings, pictographs, and bones for clues. Astronomy and mathematics
represent the mainstream of science, and they provide an especially rich
source of names. Since they are the earliest scholarly arts, names from the
history of astronomy and mathematics are easier to find than names from
other areas. Astronomy and mathematics march together through the
centuries^, not really breaking apart until the end of the 19^*' century.
Historical records tend to record the work of the
mathematician/astronomer because it had great practical importance in
social planning and agriculture.
The other sciences joined the mainstream little by little. Physics,
for example, was more a practical skill than a scholar’s tool until the 19^*'
century. It then grew into the great mix of physics that we have today:
e.g, solid state, nuclear, quantum, crystallography, etc. Therefore, to track
people who engaged in what is now called physics, one needs to look at
inventors, engineers, and toolmakers as well as university scholars.
Today’s chemists were once called alchemists, and they counted as
scientists. The records are scattered for these fields and less likely to be
translated. The same situation exists for the other fields of science. The
names of these women appear in a wonderfully diverse set of places.
A Sample of Women
Health care is the one field in which women have
always participated. Women have always been
physicians. The earliest written name of a woman who
was a physician is Merit Ptah^ (c. 2700 BCE), a name
from 4700 years ago! Her name and image are on a
tomb in the Valley of Kings in Egypt. Her patient may
have died, but she is preserved in stone for eons. In
Washington Academy of Sciences
7
addition to their participation in medicine and surgery, midwifery was
almost exclusively managed by women until the 18^'^ century.
Lost in myth is Agande (12^*^ century BCE) who Homer tells us
was knowledgeable in the medicinal value of plants. The Greek Agnodice
(4^*' century BCE) was a physician who was brought to trial for acting as a
physician. The result of her trial was that the medical profession was
legalized for all the free-born women of Athens. Ancient Rome had her
own physicians — women like Victoria and Leoparda. There are several
physicians and midwives from the century BCE Greece: Sotira was a
Greek physician; Salpe was a well-known Greek midwife as were
Olympias of Thebes and Metrodora. A manuscript by Metrodora exists in
Florence. Lais is yet another physician in Greece. Fabiola (d. 399 CE)
practiced medicine. She was a Christian follower of St. Jerome.
And then later the names multiply. Jumping ahead a bit — six hundred
years later, in 1096, the first Crusade brought a need for expanded medical
facilities in Constantinople. The emperor built a 10,000 bed
hospital/orphanage managed by his daughter Anna Comena. She had been
well trained by tutors in astronomy, medicine, history, military affairs,
history, geography, and math. Slightly later, one of the best equipped
hospitals of the time was founded in Byzantium by Emperor John II (1 1 18
-1143 CE). Men and women were housed in separate buildings, each
containing ten wards of fifty beds, with one ward reserved for surgical
cases and another for long-term patients. The staff was a team of twelve
male doctors and one fully qualified female doctor as well as a female
surgeon. Their names are lost to us.
Trotula lived in the 1 1^*' century and held a chair in the school of medicine
at the University of Salerno. The Regimen sanitatis salermtatum contained
many contributions from her work and was widely used into the 16^^'
century. She promoted cleanliness, a balanced diet, exercise, and
avoidance of stress — a very modern combination. Salerno was home to
other women of medicine including Abella, Rebeca de Guama,
Margaritan, and Mercuriade (all 14^*^ century CE). Among those who held
diplomas for surgery were Maria Incamata of Naples and Thomasia de
Mattio of Castro Isiae. Alessandra Giliana (c. 1318 CE) was an anatomist
at Bologna. Dorotea Bucca (1360 - 1436 CE) held a chair of medicine at
the University of Bologna.
Hildegard of Bingen-am-Rhein (1098 - 1179 CE) is one of our true
geniuses. She is honored by nurses as the founder of holistic medicine.
Spring 2007
8
She was a Benedictine nun and well-known mystic who wrote volumes of
text that were best sellers in her lifetime. A web search on her name will
turn up almost a million hits. She was sent to a convent as a young child
where she remained the rest of her life. While there she wrote in her
journal speaking of her nurse:
This wonderful woman who had guided me in observing
the range of positions of the rising and setting Sun, who
had had me mark with a crayon on a wall the time and
place where the warming sunlight first appeared in the
morning and finally disappeared each and every day of my
eleventh year.^
This is the mark of the true scientist. How many of us have done
this at eleven years of age?
Moving forward in time we find other women of medicine —
Marie Colinet (c. 1580 CE) treated patients throughout Germany and was
the first to use a magnet to remove a sliver of metal from a patient’s eye.
Isabelle Warwicke was an English surgeon (c. 1572 CE). Dorothea
Christiana Leporin Erxleben (1715 - 1762 CE) was the first woman to
receive a full M.D. from a German university (University of Halle). This
was an exceptional case, however, and required the intervention of
Frederick the Great to make it happen. The doors to official medicine in
Europe remained closed to women from the Middle Ages until the 19^*^
century.
Elizabeth Blackwell (1821 - 1910 CE) decided to enter college to
study medicine and surgery. She finally succeeded at a small college in
Geneva, New York (Geneva Medical College) and was awarded the first
M.D. given to a woman in the United States (1849). Although a lot of
textbooks list Dr. Blackwell as the first American doctor who was a
woman, she was not the first woman to practice as a doctor. That honor
goes to Harriet Hunt (1805 - 1875 CE) who set up shop in 1835. Harriet
was finally awarded an honorary degree from the New England Female
Medical College in 1853. Another first was Sarah Read Adamson Dolley
(1829 - 1909 CE) who was the first woman to intern in a hospital (1851).
She graduated from Central Medical College, New York.
The number of women in medicine in the United States multiplied with
the opening the New England Female Medical College in 1848 in Boston.
Washington Academy of Sciences
9
Twenty-six years later the school merged with the Boston University
School of Medicine thus becoming one of the earliest coed medical
colleges. One of the first teachers there was Dr. Marie Zakrzewska, a
German-born pioneer of women in medicine. In 1857 Dr. Esther Hawks
(1833 - 1906 CE) graduated from this college and shortly afterward
became a physician during the Civil War years. You can read the story of
her life in her diary^®.
The second woman to receive an M.D. in the United States was Lydia
Folger Fowler (1822 - 1879 CE) who received the degree in 1850 from
Central Medical College in Syracuse, New York, the first medical
institution to admit women on a regular basis.
With this brief look I pulled out all those names in medicine. Once
the doors of medicine opened the women poured through them and began
to contribute equally with the men. In the 20^^ century they were even
receiving Nobel Prizes — Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin (1910 - 1994 CE),
for example, received the 1964 Prize in chemistry for her work with
penicillin and vitamin
And in the other areas of science — did the women contribute?
Certainly they did. Women stayed the course in astronomy and
mathematics as well as all the other sciences. Even Hildegard wrote about
the movement of the stars through the skies. I concentrated on women in
medicine as just one example of a science where women contributed from
the beginning. There are even more names for the other sciences. I provide
over 400 such names in the book The Hidden Giants, published by
A\^vvv. lulu. com. I shall share just four names from the long list —
excluding Hypatia and Marie Curie because everyone knows about them.
Marie Meurdrac (c. 1666) wrote what is probably the first book- on
chemistry by a woman for women — La Chimie Charitable et facile, en
favenr des dames. In it she says that minds have no sex. Think of it. Long
before the current women’s movement, women were writing that equality
of opportunity would mean equality of scholarship.
Elena Cornaro Piscopia (1646 - 1684 CE) of Venice was a prodigy
of learning. She received a doctorate in philosophy at Padua in the
presence of a myriad of learned scholars. The University had a medal
coined in her honor and still has a marble statue of her. Vassar College in
New York has a stained glass window depicting her achievements. She
studied Latin, Greek, music, theology, and mathematics and eventually
learned Hebrew, Arabic, Chaldaic, French, English, and Spanish. She
Spring 2007
10
studied philosophy and astronomy. Musically talented, by the time she
was 17 years old she could sing, compose, and play instruments such as
the violin, harp, and harpsichord.
And then there was Marie Cunitz (1610 - 1664 CE), an
astronomer, a woman who watched the skies. Her father educated her at
home where she studied languages, classics, science, and the arts. Then
she married a physician and amateur astronomer. Before long she was the
primary astronomer in the family. At thirty she published a set of
astronomical tables. In them she simplified Kepler’s method for
calculating the positions of planets. Marie translated his rather esoteric
Latin writings and simplified the calculations into ones that did not use
Kepler’s complicated logarithms. Figure 2 shows the cover page of that
book. It was an important book, and it went through many editions. In
later editions her husband had to write a preface saying it was all her own
work. It was so useful that readers assumed he'd written it for her.
U K A N 1 A
PROPITIA
Tabuk Aflronomsca'. miry iaciles. vim
hypothcfium phyficaruin a Kcpplcro pro*
dinrum complexxt facillinio calcuiandiconipcnJiOj
line ulla Logarithmorum mcntioflc,pb£no-
menis fatisfactentcs.
Quarum ufum pro tempore priclentei
exado.&futuro, (acccdenteinrupcr facillimi Superb*
rum SATURNiat JOVISad eiiatorcni.& Crtio f«i» confonam
rw*<Micfntre<io£lion€)dupIici*tlion*4re, L*tino& vernactiio ^ /.
fdcciodii pfaefcriprum cam Afti» Caltof'ba* > • ’*i
communicit
MARIA CUNITIA.
Iff:
ntm unt)
burcS ixm wmttttliins, auff emcfon&cfs
KbmN atlb/olltrlMamKit !Bni-(ffliiil/iiai^,.ti«Ml19t/
Sub Gnauhrsbus Trivsi-gus pcrpctuis,
fumpiiStis Aaofii.
KicoJtbit ] o a A H N. S in f f 1 4 T OS,
AKNO M. DC 1.
FIGURE 2 cover of book by Marie Cunitz
Cunitz's troubles didn't end with her death. The 18^^' century was
not very hospitable to women. Astronomers of the so-called
Washington Academy of Sciences
11
Enlightenment period couldn't digest her. Forty years after her death, one
complained that ‘'she was so deeply engaged in astronomical speculation
that she neglected her household.” The woman once called the second
Hypatia was demoted to second class status. She is just one of the many
women in the history of astronomy and mathematics.
One of the 20^*^ century geniuses was Grace Brewster Murray
Hopper (1906 - 1992 CE) who was the first in many things. She received
a Ph.D. from Yale University in 1934 in mathematics. She joined the US
Navy where she remained for the rest of her career. She was the first
woman to;
• Develop operating programs for the first automatically sequenced
digital computer (1945)
• Develop the concept of automatic programming (1951) that lead to
COBOL
• Receive the computer science Man of the Year awards from the
Data Processing Management Association (1969)
• Receive the U.S. Medal of Technology (1991).
She was the oldest person on active duty in the US Navy when she
finally retired at the age of eighty attaining the rank of Commodore. She
kept retiring and the U.S. Navy kept bringing her back to active duty. She
gave the most inspiring speeches and often testified before Congress. She
helped to drive the computer revolution. She said she invented the term
‘computer bug,’ and the logbook bears her out. It happened with one of
the first electronic computers — which used diode tubes. The computer
had died overnight and the next morning she found a moth in the frizzled
relay. The term ‘bug’ — meaning defect in a machine, plan, or the like —
was used long before this however. Thomas Edison is said to have
discovered a ‘bug’ in his phonograph, implying an imaginary insect. So
although ‘computer bug’ begins with Grace Hopper, the concept of ‘bug’
does not (See Figure 3).
This is just the merest whisper of the many names of women in
science. There are so many, and each provides a light for others to follow
through the centuries. Every part of science is covered from anatomy to
zoology.
Spring 2007
12
Photo # NH 96566-KN First Computer "Bug”. 1945
(X»^Cc»«sA
I
FIGURE 3 page from computer log book with moth pasted onto the page
The Results of Science Have No Gender
Did every scientist change the world? No. We easily remember the
few people, both male and female, who produced something with a value
that lives through centuries. These are the paradigm shifters. History is
quick to record their names. Then there are those people, far, far greater in
number than the paradigm shifters, who produce something of value for
their time and place, and possibly for many times and places. These
people are much more difficult to find, and yet they are important. They
provide the basis upon which the rare genius can build a new paradigm.
These women and men are important; they are special.
There is something that encompasses not only the 20^*’ century but
also all the centuries before it. Successful science works — repeatedly.
The results from science can be tested, repeated, and used by others.
Successful science works — when the model doesn’t work, scientists
begin anew to find one that does. Over and over they repeat their attempts
Washington Academy of Sciences
13
until something, even if only the smallest of somethings, works. Small
something by small something, the rewards from science accumulate and
grow into ever more useful solutions for human problems.
Scientists have certain attributes in common with each other. They
share the attributes of luck, education, ability and sweat. The scientist is in
the right place at the right time; i.e., is lucky. The scientist absorbs as
much education as possible. It is the education that provides the grist for
the mind to use any luck it encounters. The scientist has a nimble and
adaptable mind. And finally, the scientist works hard — very, very hard.
Most of the effort is repetitive and boring. The excitement is rare, and
when it comes, it is the deepest joy and greatest wonder — all the labor is
worth those few ecstatic moments. Both women and men share these
attributes. There is no gender lurking in this definition. None.
There is no gender in the attributes; is there gender in the access?
Yes, access to scholars and information has always depended upon
gender, location, birth, and luck. If one was bom to a secure family then
one might learn to read, write, and cipher. Men have the advantage here.
Therefore, if a woman was literate and numerate, she was likely to have
links to a tutor, a benevolent father, husband or brother who was willing to
share knowledge. Perhaps, though, she lived during a time when women
had the great convent schools of England, France, and Germany open to
them^^.
Regardless, the overwhelmingly vast majority of people, both male
and female, had no access at all. They labored for their very food and
shelter. The freedom to specialize in scholarship rarely put food onto the
table. This freedom springs from the human need to dream a future. Those
who are freed to dream are freed by the labor of the rest. One of the
greatest strengths of our species is its recognition that scholarship is
worthy, important, valuable, and necessary.
The results of science have no gender. That is worth repeating. The
results of science have no gender. We cannot back out of some invention,
some theory, some solution whether the originator was female or male.
The attributes of the scientist and the science are intelligence (the ability
to combine information quickly, organize thoughts, and coordinate actions
to achieve results), skepticism (the ability to question), luck (the ability to
take quick advantage of an opportunity), sweat (the ability to work hard),
and courage (the ability to maintain a clarity of thought despite
opposition). Women have courage aplenty. Women share the common
Spring 2007
14
intelligence of humanity. They are superlative skeptics. The sweat of their
bodies waters all the monuments of the world. Many have shared luck
with their male brethren. We need to celebrate these women along with
the men and raise them all to be heroes. Understanding of science and
technology will only strengthen our life, our work, and our world. We
want solutions to our problems. They come from research, thought, and
technology.
In addition, there is the wonderful news that at the beginning of the
21^^ century we have women by the thousands achieving advanced degrees
in all the technical fields. It took 188 years for American women to get the
right to vote; in the last 15 years American women earned over 15,000
Ph.D.’s in technical fields. Graduate schools in medicine and dentistry are
routinely 50% female. In South America the Argentinean Astronomical
Society is now 33% female. This group of Mexicans, Chileans, Brazilians,
and Argentineans, most of them young mothers starting post-doctoral
positions, calls itself ALMA. It began at the 1981 International
Astronomical Union meeting held in Merida, Venezuela. Their
networking is informal but strong.
It is time to put our women of the past into our stories of the
present and our hope for the future. The pursuit of science is greater than
any fantasy, than any game. Out of our joy in study and our endeavors on
mountaintops, oceans and labs come solutions to problems — the
problems of the world. And we give it away freely — the best of gifts —
the light of knowledge to our daughters and sons.
I can’t leave Hypatia out completely. I end with a quote from her:
''Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at alV
Washington Academy of Sciences
15
References
( 1 ) The first name in written liistor\' is Imliotep, tlie arcliiteet of the first pyramid. The
ancient Eg> ptians thought so liiglily of liiin that they made liim a god in their
pantheon. It is tlie first and last time that I know of tliat a scientist was made a god.
(2) Gerda Lemer, Journal of American History, 69, 1, 1982, pages 7-20
(3) D. Appleton and Company
(4) 1982, Doubleday
{5) Men of the Stars, P. Moore, 1986, Galleiy^ Books, NY, NY
(6) The word science is from the Latin scientia or knowledge.
(7) Astronomy did not grow out of astrolog> . The science of astronomy predates tlie art
of astrology by several thousand years.
(8) The Timetables of Women's History, Karen Greenspan, 1994, Simon & Schuster
(9) The Journal of Hildegard of Bingen, B. Laclunaa Bell Tower, 1993
(10) ,4 Woman Doctor's Civil War, Esther Hill Hawks’ Diar\\ ed. G. Schwartz,
University of South Carolina Press, 1986.
(11) Joliannus Kepler was also an astronomer. He codified the laws of planetary^ motion -
Kepler’s Laws as we know them today - a metliod for predicting the positions of
planets as they orbit the Sun. Tliey are a fundamental and crucial part of modem
astronomy.
(12) The Timetables of Women's History, Karen Greenspan, 1994, Simon & Schuster
Spring 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
ON THE ERAS IN THE HISTORY OF STATISTICS
AND DATA ANALYSIS
17
Yasmin H. Said
Center for Computational Statistics
George Mason University
Abstract
In tliis paper, we present a view of tlie evolution of statistical tliinking
tluough eras we designate as Pre-modem, Classical, Recent Past, and
Future. We argue that modes of tliinking about data and statistical
inference are noticeably different from one era to the next. We discuss
some of tlie leading figures in each of these eras.
Introduction
The word ‘‘statistics” refers at once to an academic discipline,
to a powerful tool for inference on data, and to results of the collection
and application of statistical tools to data. Statisticians generally think of
the word statistics as either the discipline or the body of methods
comprising the tool while the general public more often thinks of statistics
in the third sense, that is, a collection of numerical data as in ‘sports
statistics.’ The word statistics is derived from the Latin statisticum
collegium meaning the council of state. Similarly, the Italian word statista
means statesman or politician. Thus, generically statistics means data
about the state. The more modern term seems to have been the German
word Statistik, popularized and perhaps coined by the German political
scientist Gottfried Achenwall (1719-1772) in his Vorhereitung zur
Staatswissenschqft (1748). The word statistics seems to have been
introduced as an English language word by Sir John Sinclair (1754-1835).
Sinclair was the supervisor of the Statistical Account of Scotland (1791-
1799), which was published in 21 volumes and was the first systematic
attempt to compile social and economic statistics for every parish in the
country. In the Statistical Account of Scotland^ Sinclair describes where
he had come across the word statistics and why he translated and used it
as an English word.
Spring 2007
18
Generally for statisticians, the set of methodologies that comprise
statistics include mathematical, computational, and graphical methods and
may be applied to a wide variety of types of data including traditional
numerical data, categorical data, image data, and even text data. In this
discussion, we focus on the statisticians’ perspective and discuss the
development of methodologies and applications within an intellectual
framework. The history of statistics can be conceived in a sequence of
overlapping eras that are designated as follows;
Pre-modem Period
Classical Period
Recent Past Period
Future Period
prior to 1900
1900 to 1985
1962 to 2005
after 1981.
The Pre-modern Period
In the Pre-modem Period, one of the most interesting early examples of
the recognition of variability is the so-called Trial of the Pyx. The Trial of
the Pyx is a procedure for maintaining the integrity of newly minted coins
in the United Kingdom (England). From shortly after the Norman
Conquest (1066) in a procedure that has been essentially unchanged since
1282, the London (later Royal) Mint selects a sample of each day’s coins
that are reserved in a box called the Pyx. The earliest agreements between
the mint and the monarchy stated that a certain tolerance would be
allowed in the weight of a single coin and by linear extrapolation in the
aggregate weight of the contents of the Pyx. Thus, earlier than 1 100, there
was a formalized methodology for allowance of uncertainty and a method
by which the integrity of the entire coinage could be judged based on a
sample in the presence of uncertainty in the production process.*
The roots of modem statistical methodology can be traced to the
mid-seventeenth century. The earliest inferences are to a large extent
based on graphical methods that are later echoed in what is labeled above
as the Future Period. John Graunt’s (1620-1674) Natural and Political
Observations upon Bills of Mortality published in 1662 gathered and used
spatial data and map layouts to make inferences about sex ratios and
disease types based on the bills of mortality. In effect, John Graunt can be
considered the founder of statistical epidemiology. Correspondence
between Pierre Fermat (1601-1665) and Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) during
the 1650s and a short tract by Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) published
in 1657 begin to lay the foundation of mathematical probability. However,
Washington Academy of Sciences
19
all the early work along these lines focus on games of chance and do not
come to grips with the use of probability for statistical inference.
Other notable figures in the Pre-modern Period include Reverend
Thomas Bayes (1702-1761), a Presbyterian minister, noted for the
development of Bayes Theorem, published posthumously; William
Playfair (1759-1823), noted for bar charts, pie charts, and time series
plots; Charles Minard (1781-1870), whose graphical display of
Napoleon’s March on Moscow is often cited as a classic representation of
five-dimensional data; Simeon Denis Poisson (1781-1840) and Carl
Frederick Gauss (1777-1855), who began the development of statistical
distribution theory; and John Snow (1813-1858), whose use of the 1855
Cholera Map of London is recognized as one of the classic graphical
displays in epidemiology. Towards the end of the Pre-modern period. Sir
Francis Galton (1822-1911), cousin to Charles Darwin, developed the
concept of regression toward the mean, described as early as the 1870s,
and in 1888 he established the concept of correlation. In 1889, he
published Natural Inheritance, in which he formally described the notions
of regression and correlation.
The Classical Period
The Classical Period (1900-1985) is characterized by a shift from
descriptive methods to an increasingly mathematical formulation of
methodologies. It must be remembered that computation was a tedious
procedure and data collection a relatively costly process. For this reason,
in the classical period there was considerable emphasis on optimality so
that data were used efficiently, and on mathematical simplicity so that
computation could be done rapidly. Hallmarks of theory developed in this
era include small data sets, manual computation, and strong and often
unverifiable assumptions.
By the turn of the twentieth century, several practitioners are
recognized as the first modern statisticians, Karl Pearson (1857-1936)
generally being recognized as the first. Pearson was deeply interested in
religion and studied mathematics, physics, metaphysics, physiology with
emphasis on Darwinism, Roman law, medieval and 16^*' century German
literature, and finally English law. In 1885, he was appointed to the Chair
of Applied Mathematics at University College, London. The next ten
years in this Chair saw an extremely productive era for Pearson. He gave
Spring 2007
20
lectures on statistics, dynamics and mechanics, completed the unfinished
first volume of Clifford’s The Common Sense of the Exact Sciences
(published in 1885), completed and edited the half-written first volume of
Todhunter’s Histoiy of the Theory of Elasticity, began working on the
second volume, published many papers on applied mathematics, lectured
on The Ethic of Free Thoitght, and undertook research on a number of
historical topics, including the evolution of Western Christianity. The
publication of Gabon’s book in 1889 sparked Pearson’s interest in
statistical methods. Along with Gabon and Walter Weldon, Pearson was
co-founder of the first statistical journal, Biometrika, and served as its
editor for 35 years until his death. The first issue of Biometrika appeared
in October 1901. Pearson set up a statistical laboratory circa 1905 that was
combined upon Gabon’s death in 1911 with Gabon’s laboratory to
become the Department of Applied Statistics at University College,
London. Pearson was offered and accepted the Chair. Pearson’s statistical
work included the development of the Pearson curves, a very inclusive
family of statistical distributions, large sample correlation analysis, and
the earliest attempts at hypothesis testing.
William S. Gosset (1876-1937) was trained as a mathematician
and a chemist. In 1899, he secured a job as a chemist with Arthur
Guinness Son and Company. Inspired by variability in the manufacturing
process while working in the Guinness brewery in Dublin, he began to
develop several important statistical methods. In 1905 he contacted
Pearson and studied at University College, London in 1906-1907. Because
Guinness had a policy that prohibited employees from publishing research
papers regardless of their content, Gosset adopted the pseudonym Student.
His work included results on limiting and sample distributions with his
most famous achievement being the so-called Student t-test, still widely
used even in the present era.
Sir Ronald Fisher (1890-1962) is widely recognized as the third
and probably most important of the first modem statisticians. He studied
mathematics and astronomy at Cambridge, but was also interested in
biology. He graduated with distinction in the mathematical tripos of 1912.
He continued his studies at Cambridge on the theory of errors. Fisher’s
interest in the theory of errors eventually led him to investigate statistical
problems. After leaving Cambridge, Fisher worked for several months on
a farm in Canada, but soon returned to London and took up a position as a
statistician in the Mercantile and General Investment Company. When war
Washington Academy of Sciences
21
broke out in 1914 he tried to enlist in the army, having already trained in
the Officers’ Training Corps while at Cambridge. He was rejected for
military service because of his eyesight. He became a teacher of
mathematics and physics, teaching at Rugby and other similar schools
between 1915 and 1919. Fisher gave up being a mathematics teacher in
1919 when he was offered two posts simultaneously. Karl Pearson offered
him the post of chief statistician at the Galton laboratories, but he was also
offered the post of statistician at the Rothamsted Agricultural Experiment
Station, which was the oldest agricultural research institute in the United
Kingdom. It was established in 1837 to study the effects of nutrition and
soil types on plant fertility, and this appealed to Fisher’s interest in
farming. He accepted the post at Rothamsted. Here he made many
contributions to statistics, in particular the design and analysis of
experiments, and also to genetics. He studied the design of experiments by
introducing the concept of randomization and the analysis of variance,
procedures now used throughout the world. In 1921 he introduced the
concept of likelihood. The likelihood of a parameter is proportional to the
probability of the data, and it gives a function that usually has a single
maximum value, which he called the maximum likelihood. Fisher
published a number of important texts; in particular. Statistical Methods
for Research Workers (1925) ran to many editions that he extended
throughout his life.
Pearson and Fisher had a long, bitter, and very public dispute. At
first they exchanged friendly letters after Pearson received a manuscript
from Fisher in September 1914 of a paper he was submitting for
publication to Biometrika. Pearson’s initial response was to offer his
hearty congratulations and, if correct, offered to publish the paper. Later,
having read the paper fully he indicated that it marked a distinct advance.
By May 1916 they were still corresponding in a friendly manner.
However, Pearson misunderstood the assumptions of Fisher’s maximum
likelihood method, and criticized it in his May 1917 Cooperative Study, a
paper that he co-authored with his staff concerning tabulating the
frequency curves. Fisher, believing that Pearson’s criticism was
unwarranted, responded with a paper that criticized examples in the
Cooperative Study to the extent of ridiculing them. Fisher had looked
again at his earlier correspondence with Pearson, noticed that many of his
papers had been rejected, and concluded that Pearson had been
responsible. Thus began one of the most famous feuds in the history of
statistics.
Spring 2007
22
There are a number of important second-generation statisticians in
the Classical Period. Egon Pearson (1895-1980) was the son of Karl
Pearson. In 1921 he joined his father’s Department of Applied Statistics at
University College London as a lecturer. However, his father kept him
away from lecturing. Egon attended his father’s lectures and began to
produce a stream of high quality research publications on statistics. In
1924, Egon became an assistant editor of Biometrika, but perhaps one of
the most important events for his future research happened in the
following year. Jerzy Neyman (1894-1981) was stimulated by a letter
from Egon Pearson, who sought a general principle from which Gosset’s
tests could be derived. Neyman went on to produce fundamental results on
hypothesis testing and, when Egon Pearson visited Paris in the spring of
1927, they collaborated in writing their first paper. Between 1928 and
1933, they wrote a number of fundamental papers on hypothesis testing,
the best-known result being the Neyman-Pearson Lemma. Neyman moved
to the University of California, Berkeley in 1938 and remained there until
his death in 1981. He was reputed to have been working on a research
paper in the hospital where he died.
Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov (1903-1987) laid the axiomatic
foundations for probability theory in 1933 and also in 1938 laid out the
foundations for Markov random processes. Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis
(1893-1972) undertook work on experimental designs in agriculture. In
1924, he made some important discoveries about the probable error of
results of agricultural experiments, which put him in touch with Fisher.
Later in 1926, he met Fisher at the Rothamsted Experimental Station and a
close personal relationship was immediately established that lasted until
Fisher’s death. In 1927, Mahalanobis spent a few months in Karl
Pearson’s laboratory in London. During this period he performed
extensive statistical analyses of anthropometric data and closely examined
Pearson’s Coefficient of Racial Likeness (CRL) for measurement of
biological affinities. He noted several shortcomings of the CRL and in
1930 published his seminal paper on the D-square statistic, which is now
recognized as the Mahalanobis Distance.
Harold Hotelling (1895-1973) earned a Ph.D. in mathematics from
Princeton University, and began teaching at Stanford University that same
year, 1924. Hotelling realized that the field of statistics would be more
useful if it employed methods of higher mathematics, so in 1929, he went
Washington Academy of Sciences
23
to England to study with R. A. Fisher. When Hotelling returned to the
United States, he began developing some of his techniques at Stanford
University. His early applications involved the diverse fields of
journalism, political science, population, and food supply. Hotelling was a
pioneer in the field of mathematical statistics and economics in the 20th
century, with contributions to the theory of demand and utility, welfare
economics, competition, game theory, depreciation, resource exhaustion,
and taxation. His work in mathematical statistics included his famous
1931 paper on the Student’s /-distribution for hypothesis testing, in which
he laid out what has since been called confidence intervals.
Carl Harald Cramer (1893-1985) entered the University of
Stockholm in 1912 and worked as a research assistant on a biochemistry
project before becoming firmly settled on research in mathematics. He
earned a Ph.D. in 1917 for his thesis. On a class of Dirichlet series. In
1919 Cramer was appointed assistant professor at the University of
Stockholm. He began to produce a series of papers on analytic number
theory. It was through his work on number theory that Cramer was led
towards probability theory. He also had a second job, namely as an
actuary with the Svenska Life Assurance Company. This led him to study
probability and statistics that then became the main area of his research.
Cramer became interested in the rigorous mathematical formulation of
probability in work of the French and Russian mathematicians, in
particular the axiomatic approach of Kolmogorov. By the mid 1930s
Cramer’s attention had turned to the approach of the English statisticians
such as Fisher and Egon Pearson as well as contemporary American
statisticians. During World War II, Cramer was cut off from the rest of the
academic world. By the end of World War II he had written his
msLStevplQce Mathematical Methods of Statistics. In addition to his seminal
book, Cramer is known for his work on stationary stochastic processes and
for the Cramer-Rao inequality.
Calyampudi Radhakrishnan Rao" was born on September 10, 1920
in a small village, called Huvvinna Hadagalli, then in the integrated
Madras Province of British India, but now in the state of Karnataka. He
was the eighth child among ten children born to his parents,
C. Doraiswami Naidu, his father, an inspector of police, and A.
Lakshmikanthamma, his mother. Professor Rao is one of the most well
known living statisticians. He is currently professor emeritus at Penn State
University. He received an M.S. in mathematics from Andhra University
Spring 2007
24
and an M.S. in statistics from Calcutta University in 1943. Professor Rao
worked at the Indian Statistical Institute and the Anthropological Museum
in Cambridge before acquiring a Ph.D. at King’s College under R. A.
Fisher in 1948. Among his best known discoveries are the previously
mentioned Cramer-Rao inequality and the Rao-Blackwell theorem, both
related to the quality of estimators. Other areas he worked in include
multivariate analysis, theory of parameter estimation, and differential
geometry, especially as it applies to estimation.
Samuel Wilks (1906-1964) began to study mathematics at the
University of Texas in 1926 where he was taught set theory and other
courses in advanced mathematics. Wilks received an M.A. in mathematics
in 1928. Wilks was awarded a fellowship to the University of Iowa where
he studied for his doctorate under H. L. Rietz. Rietz introduced him to
Gosset’s theory of small samples and R. A. Fisher’s statistical methods.
After receiving his doctorate in 1931 on small sample theory of ‘matched’
groups in educational psychology, he continued research at Columbia
University in the 1931-1932 session. In 1932, Wilks spent a period in Karl
Pearson’s department in University College, London. In 1933 he went to
Cambridge where he worked with John Wishart, who had been a research
assistant to both Pearson and Fisher. He was appointed instructor of
mathematics at Princeton in 1933. He was to remain there for the rest of
his career, being promoted to professor of mathematical statistics in 1944.
Wilks’s work was all on mathematical statistics. His early papers on
multivariate analysis were his most important, one of the most influential
being. Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. He constructed
multivariate generalizations of the correlation ratio and the coefficient of
multiple correlation and studied random samples from a normal
multivariate population. He advanced the work of Neyman on the theory
of confidence-interval estimation. In 1941, Wilks developed his theory of
‘tolerance limits. ’ Wilks was a founder member of the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (1935). There are obviously many other important
contributors to the development of statistical theory in this Classical
Period, but the ones mentioned here will suffice to give a flavor of the
group. Much theory and methodology in the sense of the Classical Period
still continues to be developed.
Washington Academy of Sciences
25
The Recent Past Period
The Recent Past Period (1962-2005) was marked by a major
transition in thinking. Prior to 1962 in the Classical Period the focus was
on the development of what is now called confirmatory analysis.
Hypothesis testing, estimation, regression analysis, and variants of them
were the major methodologies. As mentioned earlier, these methods
usually required strong and often unverifiable assumptions. John Tukey
(1915-2000) represents a bridge between the Classical Period and the
Recent Past Period. In the landmark 1962 paper of Tukey entitled, ‘The
future of data analysis,” and later in the 1977 book. Exploratory Data
Analysis''' Tukey sets forth a new paradigm for statistical analysis. In
contrast to confirmatory analysis in which a statistical model is assumed
and inference is made on the parameters of that model, exploratory data
analysis (EDA) is predicated on the fact that one does not necessarily
know that model assumptions actually hold for data under investigation.
Because the data may not conform to the assumptions of the confirmatory
analysis, inferences made with invalid model assumptions are subject to
(potentially gross) errors. The idea then is to explore the data to verify that
the model assumptions actually hold for the data in hand. This concept
sparked a major revolution in the thought processes of statisticians and
stimulated an outpouring of new methods. A brief review of statistical
research publications that explicitly use the phrase Exploratory Data
Analysis between 1960 and 2004 produces the following table.
Of course, many more research papers were published motivated by this
concept but which did not explicitly use the phrase exploratory data
analysis in the key word list.*'^
John Tukey was home schooled through the high school level. He
earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Brown University in 1936
Spring 2007
26
and a master’s degree also in chemistry in 1937. In 1937, he went to
Princeton University intending to earn a Ph.D. in chemistry, but gradually
made a transition to mathematics. In 1939 he earned a Ph.D. under
Solomon Lefschetz on a dissertation focused on topology. After
graduation he was appointed as Instructor in the Mathematics Department
at Princeton. During the World War II era, Tukey worked on artillery fire
control problems through which he came to the attention of Wilks, who
was very active with the Ballistic Research Laboratory in Aberdeen,
Maryland. At the conclusion of the war in 1945, Wilks offered Tukey a
statistics position within the Mathematics Department at Princeton.
Simultaneously, Tukey joined AT&T Bell Laboratories. His colleagues
included Claude Shannon (1916-2001) of information theory fame and
Richard Hamming (1915-1998) whose major contributions include error
correcting codes. Tukey was also very active as a government consultant.
Tukey ’s earlier contributions include major advances in spectral
estimation of time series and notably in 1965 the development of the fast
Fourier transform.
Tukey had a major impact on the AT&T Bell Laboratories, and
essentially sparked an explosion in their data analysis efforts. Prominent
among the statisticians who worked at Bell Labs and who made major
contributions to exploratory data analysis are Ram Gnanadesikan, Colin
Mallows, David Brillinger, Frank Anscombe (whose wife was a sister of
Tukey ’s wife), Jon Kettenring, John Chambers, Rick Becker and Alan
Wilks, and Daryl Pregibon. Early work in exploratory data analysis was
especially to be found in the Ivy League universities including, in addition
to Princeton, Yale University where Anscombe worked. Tukey ’s 1975
work with Jerome Friedman at Stanford University on projection pursuit
featured very early work on dynamic graphics used as an exploratory data
analysis tool and is among the earliest of the uses of computer-based
visualization for EDA.
The Future Period
The introduction of personal computers and workstations circa
1981 sparked the beginnings of the Future Period (1981 onwards). In
some ways it seems strange to date the Future from 1981, but the access to
computational resources became so dramatically different, that literally an
Washington Academy of Sciences
27
explosion of new methods resulted. The reader brought up with current
machines has little appreciation for the tedium associated with debugging
and running programs. Typically the process involved the development of
the code (usually a FORTRAN program) and punching that code and the
data into 80 column tabulator cards. The program would typically have
been submitted in person to a technician and in two to three hours the
results returned, usually printed out with no electronic version available. If
there were any errors in the code, which there frequently were, the
program would have to be corrected and resubmitted. This process could
take three, four or more iterations and easily take a week just to get one
program running in production.
The placement of computer power in the hands of the end user
made an enormous change in productivity. It should be noted that in the
EDA table above the 1980-1984 and 1985-1989 period saw an explosion
in papers in these two periods directly attributable to the introduction of
personal computing. The mid-1970s saw the emergence of integrated
circuits and their use in primitive microcomputers. Indeed the first widely
distributed microprocessor-based computer, Altair 8800, was announced
in December of 1974. By July of 1976, the Apple I computer is
introduced. Clearly a revolution was afoot, but it was not until the IBM
personal computer, the SUN and Apollo Workstations in 1981 and the
Apple Macintosh in 1984, that serious computer power was in the hands
of individual users.
Edward J. Wegman (born 1943) had moved from a faculty position
at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill to take a position as
Program Director for Statistics and Probability program at the Office of
Naval Research (ONR) in May 1978. The Office of Naval Research was
always known for the development of innovative programs, and Wegman
was asked to plan a new program. He recognized the impending impact of
universal computing on statistics, and in September 1978 he delivered an
address at the National Academy of Science outlining a plan for the
development of computational statistics. By his definition, computational
statistics meant statistical and graphical methods for analysis of data that
could not be accomplished without modern (emerging) computer
resources. He had identified at least three areas that would qualify for
being called computational statistics including computationally intensive
statistical methods, methods associated with data visualization (what was
Spring 2007
28
then called statistical graphics), and finally the use of expert systems
(artificial intelligence) for statistical analysis.
Earlier, the phrase statistical computing had been used to
characterize the translation of existing algorithms into computer code, and
programs such as BMDP, SPSS and SAS had already begun to emerge on
mainframe computers such as the IBM System 360 and System 370 by
early to mid-1970s. However, they were merely encoding already existing
traditional methods into a more conveniently formulated tool. Europeans
had been using the phrase computational statistics prior to 1978, but in
exactly the same sense as Americans had been using the phrase statistical
computing. By 1981, Wegman had developed a robust extramural research
program at ONR in computational statistics in its more modern sense.
Work funded by ONR began to emerge on several fronts including
computationally intensive methods such as bootstrapping, density
estimation, cross validation, data mining, and classification and regression
trees, and graphical methods such as brushing, grand tour, and parallel
coordinate plots. Much of the work on graphical methods is summarized
in Wegman and DePriest (1986).
Wegman early on recognized the implication of modem computing
resources for massive datasets and, in Wegman (1988), he had
characterized computational statistics as dealing with large to very large
non-homogeneous datasets, typically of high dimension. In contrast with
the formulation of methods generated in the Classical Period, methods
could be computational intensive, potentially with iterative algorithms.
Methods needed to be numerically tractable, but no longer in closed form.
The emphasis was displaced from statistical optimality to statistical
robustness.
Wegman’ s earliest training, like that of John Tukey, was in
chemistry, but he soon changed to mathematics, earning a bachelor’s
degree in 1965 from St. Louis University. He entered the University of
Iowa planning on studying algebraic topology, but soon changed over to a
combination major in mathematical statistics and computer science. He
earned the M.S. degree in 1967 and the Ph.D. in 1968 under Tim
Robertson. As mentioned earlier, he joined the Department of Statistics at
the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, the same Department that
Harold Hotelling had begun. The Department was a magnet for
distinguished faculty and visitors and Wegman became acquainted with
Washington Academy of Sciences
29
many of the second-generation statisticians including Egon Pearson,
Harald Cramer, Jerzy Neyman, and C. R. Rao. His early work focused on
asymptotic theory especially related to isotonic inference and density
estimation. At ONR, the period from 1978 to 1986 was arguably a golden
era for the development of computational statistics with such prominent
contributors as Brad Efron, Jerome Friedman, David W. Scott, Peter
Huber, David Donoho, Emanuel Parzen, Grace Wahba, Peter Bickel, and
the late Leo Breiman, all receiving support for their work from ONR. In
1986, Wegman went on to George Mason University where he has
continued as an important contributor to computational statistics, data
mining and data visualization as well as being a mentor to an emerging
generation of contributors.
Bradley Efron (born 1938) was bom in St. Paul, Minnesota, but
obtained all of his degrees in California, undergraduate in mathematics at
California Institute of Technology and graduate degrees in statistics at
Stanford University. Professor Efron is an exceptionally distinguished
scholar and has won many awards including being elected to the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National Academy of Science,
being awarded the MacArthur Prize, and honorary doctorates from the
University of Chicago and the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain.
His earliest work focused on traditional mathematical statistics and related
methodology. He is known for the wide variety of innovations, but is
perhaps best known for the development of computationally intensive
methods and especially for his innovation, the bootstrap. Professor Efron
likes to work on applied and theoretical aspects of a problem at the same
time and his focus has been on Biostatistics and astrophysical
applications.
Jerome Friedman (born 1939) grew up in Yreka, California and
earned his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley in physics
with a focus on high-energy particle physics. His earliest professional
appointments were in physics including Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory,
CERN'^, and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC). For 30
years. Professor Friedman led the computation research group at SLAC.
He gradually migrated to statistical issues taking an appointment as
visiting professor of statistics at the University of California, Berkeley in
1981 and an appointment as Professor of Statistics at Stanford in 1982
while retaining his affiliation with SLAC. Professor Friedman is without
doubt one of the world leaders in computational statistics and data mining.
Spring 2007
30
His contributions to computational statistics reflect practical experience
with data and his long history as leader of the computation research group.
His methodological contributions are legendary and include classification
and regression trees (CART), projection pursuit regression (PP-
regression), alternating conditional expectation (ACE), multivariate
adaptive regression splines (MARS), and multiple adaptive regression
trees (MART) to name just a few.
David W. Scott (bom 1950) earned his Ph.D. at Rice University.
His early work with researchers at Rice, Baylor College of Medicine, and
elsewhere focused on practical applications in fields of heart disease,
remote sensing, signal processing, clustering, discrimination, and time
series. Professor Scott has worked with the former Texas Air Control
Board on ozone forecasting and is known for his work on massive data
understanding and visualization. He is best known for his work on
nonparametric density estimation, where he has provided fundamental
understanding of many estimators including the histogram, frequency
polygon, averaged shifted histogram, discrete penalized-likelihood
estimator, adaptive estimators, oversmoothed estimators, and modal and
robust regression estimators. He has provided basic algorithms including
biased cross-validation and multivariate cross-validation.
The Future Period is clearly changing the research emphases. The
post-Sputnik era (1957-1979) saw relatively lavish funding of basic
research in statistics with only some lip service being paid to applications.
This substantial funding of undirected basic research saw also increasing
emphasis on the development of methodology. However, the post- 1981
era saw a significant increase in emphasis on applications. The availability
of computing also resulted in new and novel data structures, many of
which did not follow traditional statistical models. Wegman (2000) called
for the statistical profession to become more data centric rather than
methodology centric, i.e. to take on challenges of the new data structure
even though they did not fit conveniently within the framework of existing
statistical models. Some emerging data structures and future directions for
the profession include streaming data, image data, text data, and data
available in the form of random graphs. No longer is basic research money
easily available for research in statistical methodology alone. Increased
emphasis on real problems cannot help but be a good feature for academic
research because virtually every significant advance has been motivated
by addressing some real problem.
Washington Academy of Sciences
31
Statistical Thinking in Government, Science, and Law
Statistics as an academic discipline is intertwined with and
motivated to a large extent by official government statistics. An
interesting timeline showing these interconnections can be developed.
John Graunt (1620-1674), Gottfried Aschenwall (1719-1772), Sir John
Sinclair (1754-1835) and John Snow (1813-1858) have already been
mentioned in connection with official statistics. Anticipating by 50 years
Sir John Sinclair’s work. Pastor Johann Peter Sussmilch’s (1707-1767)
two-volume treatise. Die gdttliche Ordnimg hi den Verdndenmgen des
nienshlichen Geschlechts aus der Gebnrt, dem Tode iind der
Fortpflanzwig desselben em’eisen, appeared originally in 1741 and
combined facts from church registers and mortality statistics. The Swedish
contemporary of Siissmilch was Per Wargentin (1717-1783) is credited
with the achievements of Swedish statistics in the eighteenth century and
was used by Siissmilch in later editions of Sussmilch’s work. The first
U.S. Census was taken under the authority of Secretary of State Thomas
Jefferson in 1790. U. S. Marshals on horseback took the Census and they
counted 3.9 million people. By 1810, the U. S. Census was expanded to
obtain information on manufacturing including the amount and value of
products. By 1839, the American Statistical Society was formed to be
renamed shortly the American Statistical Association because of an
unfortunate acronym. In England, William Farr (1807-1883), an early
medical statistician, was the compiler of abstracts in the office of the
Registrar General. Using data that he compiled along with methods earlier
attributed to John Snow, he identified the source of the 1866 cholera
epidemic as water from a particular well of the London Water Company.
Meanwhile his contemporary, Ernst Engel (1821-1896) served from 1860
as Director of the Royal Prussian Statistical Bureau.
Back in the United States, Abraham Lincoln establishes the United
States Department of Agriculture (USD A) in 1862. Lincoln refers to
USDA as “the people’s department.” In 1863, the first crop report appears
and the USDA Division of Statistics is established. U. S. Census Bureau
employee Herman Hollerith invented tabulating card machines, which
were first used in the 1890 census, which counted nearly 63 million
people. In 1913, the U. S. Department of Labor is established along with
the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A major development took place in Europe
in 1953 with the development of the European Statistical System
Spring 2007
32
(EUROSTAT), which, for the first time, integrated statistics across all of
Western Europe. In short, the roots of statistics as a state science
continues to stimulate and motivate statisticians with continuing advances
in survey research and sampling theory associated with survey research.
Statistics as a methodology has become a ubiquitous subtext in the
modern scientific and social enterprise. Within medicine, clinical trials for
new medicines and medical devices are universally required for Food and
Drug Administration approvals. Such requirements have elevated
Biostatistics to an essential part of the medical curriculum. Virtually no
medical paper is published without an appropriate statistical analysis.
Indeed, sizable efforts are made to model and track potential impending
epidemics and the field of epidemiology has emerged as a quasi-
independent discipline.
Within the field of law, statistical methods and the meaning of the
weight of evidence is becoming increasing subject to statistical
interpretation. Indeed, a judicial trial is essentially an analog of statistical
hypothesis testing. The null or status quo hypothesis is that the defendant
is innocent until proven guilty. The evidence presented is intended to
convincing reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternate hypothesis
of guilt. The jury of peers is intended as a replicated sample of
independent observers (although, with human observers, this is not always
the case). Testimony of statistical experts has often been employed in the
last three decades in racial or sex discrimination cases.
An interesting new direction has been emerging with respect to
forensics in the courtroom. Statistical methods have been used to discredit
to a large extent the use of polygraph for lie detection and such testimony
is no longer allowed (National Research Council, 2003). Similarly, the
National Research Council of the National Academies (2004) has
considered bullet lead analysis used by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation using statistical methods and has increased legal challenges
to this type of evidence. Oxhtr forensic science evidence likely to come
under statistical and other technical scrutiny in the future include what is
now called friction ridge'* evidence and blood alcohol concentration
evidence'"*. While DNA evidence has been vetted from a statistical
perspective, the statistical certainty of these other forms of forensic
evidence is far less clear and is likely to lead to additional significant
Washington Academy of Sciences
33
adjustment in legal procedures and less aggressive pursuit of convictions
based on these methods.
Conclusions
The current era, i.e., what is here called the Future Period, is a
golden era for statistics as a discipline. Never in the history of statistical
research has there been more innovation, motivated by the fortuitous
combination of important problems, computational resources, and an
incredibly able cast of scholars. Those few contemporary scholars
mentioned in this article are by no means the only scholars of note. It is far
easier to list important contributors from the past as their contributions
have stood the test of time. To simply list the contemporary scholars in the
statistics discipline would be an arduous task. To give some sense of scale,
since 1962, the beginning of the Recent Past Period, there have been 1643
people named as Fellows of the American Statistical Association (ASA).
Since 1981, there have been 1033 people elected as Fellow of ASA. In
contrast to these numbers, from 1914, when the Fellow rank was
established, until 1960, there were only 464 Fellows of ASA elected. Just
the list of ASA Fellows from 1961 onwards occupies 34 pages of text.
That a person is not explicitly listed in this article should in no way be
interpreted as a lack of contribution or importance to the scholarly
enterprise by that person. There are simply too many distinguished
contributors to list individually.
Acknowledgement
The author gratefully acknowledges the long discussions with Professor
Edward J. Wegman, whose contact and experience with both the early
contributors and the evolution of statistics as a discipline over the last 40
years provided valuable insight that made this discussion possible.
' Tlie use of linear extrapolation is a flawed procedure by modem stcmdards. If a
tolerance of 2 units per coin is allowed, tlien for 100 coins, the Trial of the Pyx would
allow 200 units tolerance, whereas modem theory’ would dictate a tolerance of 2Vl00 =
20 units tolerance.
"Professor Rao’s parents named liiin Radhakrislma after Radlia and Krislma. Krislma is
believed to be incarnation of Vislmu by tlie Hindus. Today, C. Radhakrislma is
synonymous witli statistical science; however, his parents did not know their child's
destiny. At the time tliey just wanted to attach Divinity to his name. Among Hindu's,
Spring 2007
34
Radhakrislina is a chanting name for perfonning Japa yoga, wliich is one of many ancient
Indian yoga systems. Krislma was tlie eighth cliild bom in a jail where his parents.
De^ aki and Vasude\ were kept by Devaki’s brother. Kamsa. Soon after he was bom.
Krislma appeared as a four-handed Vislmu. tlie primarv Hindu God. and ad\ased
Vasudew liis father, to take liim to Gokul. All the Jail doors opened, and in torrential rain
Vasude^ crossed the inundated Yamuna River. All obstacles were removed, and thus.
Krislma ’s divinit> began manifesting. Radlia migrated to Gokul from another village.
She was a contemporan of Krishna, perhaps, some\Ahat older. Her husband never
returned from his fighting in a war, and Radha ne\ er remarried. She soon recognized tlie
Dh init> of Krislma and adopted the Bhakti yoga, surrendering to Krislma as a Bhakta
\\ould do. She was totally lost in Samadlii. deep meditation, and would forget tlie whole
world. Among Hindus. Radha’s name that is placed before Krishna, because she
exemplified the supreme and di\ ine love and surrender necessan for the ultimate
salvation.
Exploratory' Data Analysis was actually issued a fe\^ years earlier tlian 1977 in a
massh e preprint fonn tliat was widely distributed among the research oriented statistics
departments.
It should be noted tliat Tukey’s Exploratory Data Analysis book alone has more tlian
1580 citations.
“CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear Researcli. tlie world's largest particle
physics center. It sits astride the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva.”
""’Friction ridge evidence is what lias been called finger print analysis. The coimiion
\^ isdom tliat fingerprints are unique to an individual dates from tlie turn of the 20^
centurN , but tliis has never been proven scientifically. Tlie implication of U.S. lawyer,
Brandon Mayfield, a Muslim convert, in tlie March 11, 2004 Madrid Train bombings
based on erroneous finger print analysis, liiglilights tliis ambiguit\'.
""’’Blood alcohol concentration (BAG) is usually inferred from breath alcohol
concentration, wliich is traditionalh presumed to be linearly related to blood alcohol
concentration w itli no accounting for statistical fluctuations in this relationsliip. Breath
alcohol concentration is measured by the absorption of infrared wavelengtlis in two
spectral bands by tlie alcohol molecule, which can also be mimicked by other volatile
organic molecules. The presumption of intoxication at a BAG of .08 lias been
successfully cliallenged in Virginia based on tlie fact tliat it unconstitutionally sliifts the
burden of proof to the defendant to prove tliat he/she is not intoxicated.
References
Achenw all, Gottfried (1748) Vorhereitung zur Staatswnssenschaft
Glifford. William Kingdon. Rowe, Richard Gharles. and Pearson. Pearson (1885) The
Common Sense of the Exact Sciences, New^ York, D. Appleton and Gompany
Gramer. G. H.(1917) On a Class of Dirichlet Series, Ph.D. DissertatioreUniversity of
Stockholm
Washington Academy of Sciences
35
Crainer. C. H. (1945) Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Uppsala, Almqvist and
Wiksells
Fisher, R. A. (1925) Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, Oliver and
Boyd, 1st Edition (now in 14th Edition)
Galton, Francis (1889) Natural Inheritance, London and New' York, Mcinillan and
Company
Graunt, Jolin (1662) Natural and Political Obsen’ations upon the Bills of Mortality
National Research Council of the National Academies (2004) Forensic Analysis
Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence. Wasliington, D.C., National Academies Press
National Research Council of the National Academies (2003) The Polygraph and Lie
Detection. Wasliingtoa D.C., National Academies Press
Sinclair, Jolm (1791-1799) Statistical Account of Scotland {2\ volumes)
Soper, H. E., Young, A. W., Cave, B.M., Lee, A. and Pearson, K. (1917) “On tlie
distribution of tlie correlation coefficient in small samples; Appendix 11 to the papers
of ‘Student’ and RA Fisher. A Cooperative Study,” Biometrika. 1 1, 328
Stissmilch, Johami Peter and Baumann, Cluistian Jacob (1798) Die gottUche Ordniing in
den Veranderungen des menshlichen Geschlechts aus der Gehurt, dem Tode iind der
Fortpflanzung desselben erweisen. Berlin : Im Veiiag der Buchli. der Realschule (3’^'^
Edition)
Todhunter, 1. And Pearson, K. (1886) History of the Theory of Elasticity. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press
Tukey, J. W. (1962) “Tlie future of data ^itvaXysis'EAnnals of Mathematical Statistics. 33,
i-67
Tukey, J. W. (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading Massachusetts, Addison-
Wesley Publisliing Company
Wegman, E. J. and DePriest, D. J. (1986) Statistical Image Processing and Graphics.
New York, Marcel Dekker
Wegman, E. J. (1988) “Computational statistics: a new^ agenda for statistical tlieoiy and
practice,” Jowr/7^7/ of the Washington Academy of Sciences. 78, 310-322
Wegman. E. J. (2000) “On the eve of tlie 21st century: Statistical science at a
crossroads,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 32, 239-243
Wilks, S. S. (1932) “Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance,” Biometrika. 24,
471-494
Spring 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
REVIEW OF SIGN LANGUAGE STUDIES
OF CROSS-FOSTERED CHIMPANZEES
37
R. Allen Gardner
University of Nevada
Abstract
In cross-fostering, parents of one genetic stock rear young of a second
genetic stock to study tlie effect of rearing on genetic predisposition.
Cliimpanzees Washoe, Moja, Pili, Tatu, and Dar were cross-fostered in
households modeled as closely as possible after human infant
enviromnents. Washoe arrived when she was 9 or 10 months old.
Moja, Pili, Tatu, and Dar arrived within a few days of birth. When the
cross-fosterlings were present, American Sign Language (ASL) was
the only language used by human foster families. Cross-fosterlings
learned ASL from human adults and each other conversationally,
witliout drills or special treats. Semantic range was like human
semantic range - DOG for any dog, FLOWER for any flower,
including dogs and flowers on first sight. The clumps mostly initiated
conversations on tlieir own after about two years, casually as human
cliildren do, as if bom with a motive to communicate. ASL is a
naturally occurring human language permitting comparison with
human development. Development of vocabulary and pluuses was
comparable to development of human children. Development of
functional categories of answers to Wh-questions was comparable,
even advanced, as was meaningfully contingent replies to probing
questions. Cross-fosterlings also used e.xpansion, reiteration and
incorporation to maintain conversation. Pragmatics of gaze direction
and turn taking as well as gaze direction and pointing developed in
human patterns. They also developed human pragmatic devices to
indicate agent, object, and instmment. Development was slower than
human development, but without signs of asymptote. Longer years of
cross-fostering should induce furtlier progress.
Human beings grow up to be human adults partly because
they are born human, and partly because they are reared by human parents
in human societies. In cross-fostering, parents of one genetic stock rear
young of a different genetic stock to study the effect of rearing conditions
on genetic predispositions. Cross-fostering assumes that infants,
particularly human infants, develop by interacting and experiencing rather
Spring 2007
38
than by incubating and unfolding like a flower in a pot. Evolutionary
biologist, Lewontin (1991) put it this way:
... we are not determined by our genes, although surely we
are influenced by them. Development depends not only on
the materials that have been inherited from parents - that is,
the genes and other materials in the sperm and egg - but
also on the particular temperature, humidity, nutrition,
smells, sights, and sounds (including what we call
education) that impinge on the developing organism (1991,
p. 26).
Genomic psychologists and biologists seem to teach that all
animals develop according to an inexorable species-specific plan.
Provided with sufficient food, water, and shelter, each child should
develop into a typical child, each chimpanzee into a typical chimpanzee,
and so on. Current trends in genomics often seem to support this tradition.
Lewontin answers as follows:
The trouble with the general scheme of explanation
contained in the metaphor of [genetic programs] is that it is
bad biology. If we had the complete DNA sequence of an
organism and unlimited computational power, we could not
compute the organism, because the organism does not
compute itself from its genes. Any computer that did as
poor a job of computation as an organism does from its
genetic ‘‘program” would be immediately thrown into the
trash and its manufacturer would be sued by the purchaser
(1991, p. 17).
Sign language studies of cross-fostered chimpanzees assume that if
any form of behavior, human or animal, exists it exists as a natural,
biological phenomenon. The proper analysis of behavior is not in terms of
simpler behavior and more complex behavior, or in terms of lower
organisms and higher organisms, but rather in terms of general principles
that can be found in all forms of behavior. They further assume that there
is no discontinuity between verbal behavior and the rest of human
behavior, or between human behavior and the rest of animal behavior - no
barrier to be broken, no chasm to be bridged. Chimpanzees learned to use
a form of human language, American Sign Language (ASL) under nearly
the same conditions in which human children learn their first language.
Washington Academy of Sciences
39
Sibling Species
That chimpanzees look and act like human beings, is plain to see.
Modern research reveals closer and deeper biological similarities of all
kinds (Goodall, 1986). By molecular analysis, for example, chimpanzees
are closer to humans than any other species, and also closer to humans
than chimpanzees are to gorillas or to orangutans (Sarich & Cronin, 1976;
Stanyon, Chiarelli, Gottlieb, & Patton, 1986).
Most critical for human cross-fostering, chimpanzees have a long
childhood. Newborn chimpanzees are quite helpless. In our laboratory,
they failed to roll over by themselves before four to seven weeks old, sit
up before ten to fifteen weeks, or creep before twelve to fifteen weeks.
The change from milk teeth to adult dentition began at about five years.
Under natural conditions in Africa, infant chimpanzees are almost
completely dependent on their mothers until they are two or three years
old and weaning only begins when they are between four and five years
old. Menarche occurs when wild females are ten or eleven, and their first
infant is born when they are between twelve and fifteen years old
(Goodall, 1986 pp. 84-85, 443). Captive chimpanzees have remained
vigorously alive, taking tests and solving experimental problems when
they were more than 50 verified years old (Maple & Cone, 1981). Cheeta,
star of Tarzan movies, was 71 years old in 2003 (Roach, 2003) and alive
and well in 2005 (Westfall, personal communication).
A Cross-fostering Laboratory
Cross-fostering is very different from rearing a chimpanzee in a
conventional laboratory staffed by human caretakers. Cross-fostering is
also very different from keeping a chimpanzee in a home as a pet. Many
people keep pets in their homes. They may treat their pets very well, and
they may love them dearly, but they hardly treat them like children.
Providing a nearly human infant environment all day every day for years
on end is a daunting laboratory challenge. In his historic review, Kellogg
(1968) found only three cases that qualified as human-chimpanzee cross-
fostering: Kellogg & Kellogg (1933), Hayes & Hayes (Hayes 1951), and
Gardner & Gardner, only just beginning as Kellogg was writing in 1967.
All aspects of intellectual growth are intimately related. For young
chimpanzees no less than for human children familiarity with simple tools
such as keys, devices such as lights, articles of clothing such as shoes, are
intimately involved in learning signs or words for keys, lights, shoes,
opening, entering, lighting, and lacing. The Gardner laboratory in Reno
Spring 2007
40
was well-stocked with such objects and activities, and cross-fosterlings
had free access to them, or at least as much access as young human
children usually have. While no more free than human children to go
outdoors without permission they were free of mechanical restraints both
indoors and out. They not only learned to eat human style food, they
learned to use cups and spoons and to clear the table and help wash the
dishes after a meal. They not only learned to use human toilets (in their
own quarters and elsewhere) but they learned to wipe themselves and
flush the toilet, and even to ask to go to the potty to postpone lessons and
bedtimes. R. Gardner and Gardner (1989) is a detailed description of their
daily indoor and outdoor life in human-style surroundings.
The Gardner laboratory advanced beyond earlier studies because it
included five chimpanzee subjects, rather than only one, because it
continued longer, and mostly because the daily language of this infant
world was American Sign Language (ASL), the naturally occurring
language of deaf communities in North America. English, the language of
earlier studies, demands vocal apparatus and vocal habits that seem to be
beyond chimpanzees. Without conversational give-and-take in a common
language, cross-fostering conditions could hardly be said to simulate the
environment of a human infant. In the Gardner laboratory, for the first
time, cross-fostered chimpanzees and their human foster families had a
common language.
Sign Language Only
Attempting to speak good English while simultaneously signing
good ASL is about as difficult as attempting to speak good English while
simultaneously writing good Russian. Often, teachers and other helping
professionals attempt to speak and sign simultaneously. Those who have
only recently learned to sign, soon find that they are speaking English
sentences while adding the signs for a few of the key words in each
sentence (Bonvillian, Nelson, & Charrow, 1976). When a native speaker
of English practices ASL in this way, the effect is roughly the same as
practicing Russian by speaking English sentences and saying some of the
key words both in English and in Russian.
A human foster family that spoke and signed at the same time
could hardly provide an adequate model of ASL. Signing to infant
chimpanzees and speaking English among adults would also have been
inappropriate. That would have lowered the status of signs to nursery talk.
In addition, cross-fosterlings would have lost the opportunity to observe
Washington Academy of Sciences
41
adult models of conversation, and the human newcomers to sign language
would have lost significant opportunities to practice and to learn from
each other.
To a casual observer looking over the laboratory fence, the greatest
departure from the world of most human children would probably have
been the silence. Modern man is a noisy member of the animal kingdom.
Old or young, male or female, wherever you find two or more human
beings they are usually vocalizing. By contrast, chimpanzees are usually
silent. They seldom vocalize unless they are excited (Yerkes, 1929, pp.
301-309; Goodall, 1986, p. 125). Cross-fostered chimpanzees, Washoe,
Moja, Pili, Tatu, and Dar were also very silent and so were their human
companions. The only language that we used in their presence was ASL.
There were occasional lapses, as when outside workmen or their
pediatrician entered the laboratory, but the lapses were brief and rare.
When a cross-fosterling was present, all business, all casual
conversation was in ASL. Everyone in their human foster family had to be
fluent enough to make themselves understood under the sometimes hectic
conditions of life with these lively youngsters. Visits from nonsigners
were strictly limited. Visitors from the deaf community who were fluent in
ASL were always welcome.
The rule of sign-language-only required some of the isolation of a
field expedition. We lived and worked as if at a lonely outpost in a hostile
country. We were always avoiding people who might speak to our
chimpanzees. On outings in the woods, we were as stealthy and cautious
as Indian scouts. On drives in town, we wove through traffic like
undercover agents. We could stop at a Dairy Queen or a MacDonald's fast-
food restaurant, but only if they had a secluded parking lot in the back.
Then one human companion could buy the treats while another waited
with the cross-fosterling in the car. If anyone noticed a chimpanzee
passenger, the car drove off to return later for stranded passenger and
treats, when the coast was clear.
The Second Project
Project Washoe presented the first challenge to traditional
doctrines about nonhuman beings and language. But, it came to a
premature end in 1970, when of the six humans in her foster family, Susan
Nichols decided to have her own baby, and Roger Pouts determined to get
an independent post far from the University of Nevada. Failing to replace
Susan and Roger in time, we had to stop and regroup. Luckily, in the nick
Spring 2007
42
of time William Lemon kindly offered both Washoe and Roger a place at
his chimpanzee institute at the University of Oklahoma.
After two years of regrouping and planning we began a second
venture in cross-fostering. The objectives were essentially the same, but
there were several improvements in method. For example, Washoe was
nearly one year old when she arrived in Reno. A newborn subject would
have been more appropriate, but newborn chimpanzees are very scarce
and none were offered to us at the time. After Project Washoe, it was
easier for us to obtain newborn chimpanzees from laboratories.
Chimpanzee Moja, a female, was bom at the Laboratory for Experimental
Medicine and Surgery in Primates, New York, on November, 18, 1972,
and arrived in our laboratory in Reno on the following day. Chimpanzee
Pili, a male, was born at the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center,
Georgia, on October 30, 1973, and arrived in our laboratory on November,
1, 1973. (Pili died of leukemia on October 20, 1975, so that his records
cover less than two years.) Chimpanzee Tatu, a female, was born at the
Institute for Primate Studies, Oklahoma, on December 30, 1975, and
arrived in our laboratory on January 2, 1976. Finally, chimpanzee Dar, a
male, was born at Albany Medical College, Holloman AFB, New Mexico,
on August 2, 1976, and arrived in our laboratory on August 6, 1976.
Chimpanzees of the second project could interact with each other,
which added a new dimension to cross-fostering. In a human household,
children help in the care of their younger siblings who, in their turn, learn
from older siblings. Sibling relationships are also a common feature of the
family life of wild chimpanzees (Goodall, 1986, pp. 74, 176-177, 337).
At Gombe in Africa, older offspring stay with their mothers while
their younger siblings are growing up and they share in the care of their
little brothers and sisters. Close bonds form between older and younger
siblings who remain allies for life. Younger siblings follow and imitate
their big sisters and big brothers. Seven year old Flint followed and
imitated his young adult brother, Faben, in a way that would certainly be
described as hero worship if they had been human brothers. Faben was
partially paralyzed as an after effect of polio and had a peculiar and
striking way of supporting his lame arm with one foot while he scratched
the lame arm with the good arm. During a 1971 visit to Gombe, Beatrix
Gardner and I observed how Flint copied even this peculiar scratching
posture of his brother Faben. Capitalizing on relationships between older
and younger foster siblings, we started Moja, Pili, Tatu, and Dar newborn,
but at intervals, so that there would be age differences.
\Afeshington Academy of Sciences
43
The second project became a fairly extensive enterprise by the
time that there were three chimpanzee subjects. At that point, we moved
from the original suburban home to a secluded site that used to be a guest
ranch. The chimpanzees lived in the cabins that formerly housed ranch
hands. Many of the human family members lived in the guest apartments
and the rancher’s quarters. Human bedrooms were wired to intercoms in
the chimpanzee cabins so that each of the cross-fosterlings could be
monitored by at least one human adult throughout each night. There were
great old trees and pastures, corrals and barns, to play in. There were also
special rooms for observation and testing as well as office and shop
facilities. The place was designed to keep chimpanzees under cross-
fostering conditions until they were nearly grown up, perhaps long enough
for them to begin to care for their own offspring.
At all times in the second project, several human members of the
family were deaf themselves or children of deaf parents, and still others
had learned ASL and used it extensively with members of the deaf
community. With deaf participants it was “sign language only” all of the
time, whether or not there were chimpanzees present. Native signers were
the best models of ASL, for human participants who were learning ASL as
a second language as well as for chimpanzees who were learning it as a
first language. The native signers were also better observers because it
was easier for them to recognize babyish forms of ASL. Along with their
own fluency they had a background of experience with human infants who
were learning their first signs of ASL.
News of the success of Project Washoe had been warmly received
in the deaf community. There were enthusiastic articles in the Deaf
American, the most widely circulated publication in the deaf community at
that time {e.g., Swain, 1968, 1970). When we lectured at Gallaudet
College (the national college of the deaf in Washington, D C.) in 1970, we
were told that our audience was the largest that had ever turned out for a
lecture in the history of the college up to that time. Project Washoe had
opened channels of communication for consultation, advice, and
recruitment.
Teaching
We signed to each other and to cross-fosterlings throughout the
day the way human parents model speech and sign for human children.
We used a very simple and repetitious register of ASL. We made frequent
comments on common objects and events in short, simple redundant
Spring 2007
44
sentences. We amplified and expanded on their fragmentary utterances
(e.g. Tatu: BLACK/ Naomi; THAT BLACK COW/). We asked known-
answer questions {e.g WHAT THAT‘S WHAT YOUR NAME? WHAT I
DO?). We attempted to comply with requests and praised correct, well-
formed utterances. All of these devices are common in human households
(de Villiers & de Villiers, 1978; Moerk, 1983; Snow, 1972). Parents
throughout the world seem to speak to their children as if they had very
similar notions of the best way to teach languages such as English or
Japanese to a young primate (Snow & Ferguson, 1977).We did not have to
tempt them with treats or ply them with questions to get them to sign to
us. Mostly, they initiated conversations with human companions and, of
course, with each other. They commonly named objects and pictures of
objects in situations in which we were unlikely to reward them.
Washoe often signed to herself in play, particularly in places that
afforded her privacy, i.e., when she was high in the tree or alone in her
bedroom before going to sleep. ... Washoe also signed to herself when
leafing through magazines and picture books, and she resented our
attempts to join in this activity. If we did try to join her or if we watched
her too closely, she often abandoned the magazine or picked it up and
moved away. Our records show that Washoe not only named pictures to
herself in this situation, but that she also corrected herself. On one
occasion, she indicated a certain advertisement, signed THAT FOOD,
then looked at her hand closely and changed the phrase to THAT DRINK,
which was correct.
Washoe also signed to herself about her own ongoing or
impending actions. We have often seen Washoe moving stealthily to a
forbidden part of the yard signing QUIET to herself, or running pell-mell
for the potty chair while signing HURRY. (B. Gardner & Gardner, 1974,
p.20)
Modeling and Molding
Fortunately, both children and chimpanzees can learn by
procedures that tell them directly, “This is an X” or “You are (or I am)
Xing.” Modeling words and signs in this way is a natural part of nursery
life. For example, our cross-fosterlings had to brush their teeth after every
meal. At first, Washoe resisted this routine. Gradually, she came to submit
with less and less fussing, and within the first year, she started to help and
even to brush her teeth for herself Usually, after having finished her meal.
Washington Academy of Sciences
45
she would try to leave her high-chair. We would restrain her, signing,
FIRST TOOTHBRUSH, THEN YOU CAN GO.
One day, in the tenth month of the project, Washoe was visiting
the Gardner home and found her way into the bathroom. She climbed up
on the counter, looked at our mug full of toothbrushes, and signed
TOOTHBRUSH. At the time, we believed that Washoe understood the
sign TOOTHBRUSH, but we had never seen her use it. She had no reason
to ask for the toothbrushes in the Gardner bathroom, because they were
well within her reach; and it is very unlikely that she was asking to have
her teeth brushed. She was just naming a found object, to her companion
or, perhaps, to herself
Adult to adult interest was also critical. In the 1960’s many
members of Washoe’s foster family were smokers. She must have watched
them asking each other for cigarettes and matches over and over again,
although she, herself, was not allowed to smoke cigarettes or play with
matches. One day, during the 30th month of Project Washoe, Naomi (a
nonsmoker) needed to light the stove for cooking, but could not find any
matches. Washoe watched the search intently. By way of explanation,
Naomi held up an empty box of matches. And Washoe replied, SMOKE.
After this first observation, we discovered that Washoe signed SMOKE to
name both cigarettes and matches or their familiar containers.
One way to tell a chimpanzee or a child that “This is the sign for
X” is to take their hands and mold them into the sign while putting them
through the movement. We call this procedure molding (cf. Fouts, 1972).
Parents and teachers of deaf human children use it often to teach signs
(Bonvillian & Nelson, 1973, pp. 191, 199; Maestas y Moores, 1980, pp. 5-
6), and variants of molding are used in teaching all sorts of motor skills to
human children and to human adults, also. The sixth sign that Washoe
acquired, and the first that she acquired by molding, was TICKLE.
DOG was an early sign for all of our chimpanzees, but live dogs
were too distracting to use as exemplars. The youngsters chased them,
patted them, and pulled their tails; but they were usually just too excited to
sign about them. We had to use drawings and pictures to teach this sign.
Once they had mastered it they could use it to name live dogs, also, and
even to comment on the barking of an unseen dog. When she was 24
months old, Moja and her family invented a game in which she signed
DOG on a friend's thigh (an inflected form, Rimpau, Gardner, Sc Gardner,
1989). Then the friend would bark like a dog. The dog imitation of her
Spring 2007
46
human companion might be quite dramatic, even including getting down
on all fours and jumping over furniture. It was one of Moja’s favorite
games. When he was 16 months old, Pili had already started to sign DOG
to name pictures of dogs, but progress was slow until he learned the dog
game from Moja. After one incident of watching Moja play it with a
mutual friend it became a favorite game of his, also. With the dog game
added to the list of appropriate contexts, his DOG sign quickly passed the
criterion of reliability (see Gardner, Gardner, & Nichols, 1989).
Food and sweets can be powerful distracters. We soon learned that
one of the worst times to teach anything was at the beginning of mealtime.
The hungrier the chimpanzee and the more attractive the food, the more
the teaching session would dissolve into a frenzy of begging (see R.
Gardner & Gardner, 1988).
Communication and Motive
Normal human children learn to speak as if they were bom with a
powerful motive to communicate; no other incentive seems to be
necessary. Many other species behave as if they were born with a
powerful motive to communicate; communication is by no means a
uniquely human motive (Tinbergen, 1953).
Chimpanzees are among the many species that behave as if they
were born with a powerful motive to communicate (Goodall, 1986).
Captive chimpanzees are similar to wild chimpanzees in this respect
(Kellogg, 1968) unless their conditions of captivity are so severe that
normal behavior is suppressed.
A Robust Phenomenon
Washoe, Moja, Pili, Tatu, and Dar signed to friends and to
strangers. They signed to each other and to themselves, to dogs and to
cats, toys, tools, even to trees. Along with their skill with cups and spoons,
pencils and crayons, their signing developed stage for stage much like the
speaking and signing of human children (Van Cantfort & Rimpau, 1982;
Van Cantfort, Gardner, & Gardner, 1989). They also used the elementary
sorts of sign language inflections that deaf children use to modulate the
meaning of signs (R. Gardner & Gardner, 1978, pp. 56-58; Rimpau,
Gardner, & Gardner, 1989). Cross-fostered chimpanzees converse among
themselves, even when there is no human being present and the
conversations must be recorded with remotely controlled cameras. The
infant, Loulis, adopted by Washoe when he was about a year old learned
Washington Academy of Sciences
47
more than 50 signs of ASL that he could only have learned from other
chimpanzees (Fouts, Hirsch & Fouts, 1982).
In 2006, thirty-five years after she left Reno, Washoe was still
signing, not only to humans but to other chimpanzees whether or not there
were any human beings in sight (Fouts & Fouts, 1989). This is more
remarkable when we consider the procedure of Project Loulis. When
Loulis was 10 months old he was adopted by 14 year old Washoe, shortly
after she lost her own newborn infant. To show that Washoe could teach
signs to an infant without human intervention, Roger Fouts introduced a
drastic procedure. All human signing was forbidden when Loulis was
present. Loulis and Washoe were almost inseparable for the first few
years, so Washoe lost almost all her input from human signers. It was a
deprivation procedure for Washoe. Later, Moja joined the group in
Oklahoma, and still later Tatu and Dar joined the group in Ellensburg,
Washington. The signing chimpanzees were allowed to sign to each other,
indeed there was no way to stop them. They became part of Loulis’s input.
As Loulis grew older and moved freely by himself from room to
room in the laboratory, there were more opportunities for the human
beings to sign to the other chimpanzees when Loulis was not in sight. As
expected, however, the rule against signing to Loulis had a generally
negative effect on all human signing. Human signing was almost
completely withdrawn for 5 years. It was a deprivation experiment for the
cross-fostered chimpanzees.
Washoe, Moja, Tatu, and Dar continued to sign to each other and
also attempted to engage human beings in conversation throughout the
period of deprivation. Washoe modeled signs for Loulis in ways that could
only be described as explicit teaching; and she also molded his hands the
way we had molded hers (Fouts, Hirsch, & Fouts, 1982; Fouts, Fouts, &
Van Cantfort, 1989). Loulis learned more than 50 signs from the cross-
fostered chimpanzees during the five years in which they were his only
models and tutors.
Meanwhile, Washoe learned some new signs from Moja, Tatu, and
Dar, and the cross-fosterlings signed to each other without any human
beings in sight and their conversations had to be recorded by remote
cameras (Fouts & Fouts, 1989).
Once introduced, sign language is robust and self-supporting. The
regimen that the Foutses enforced to demonstrate that the infant Loulis
could learn signs from Washoe, Moja, Tatu, and Dar, was a drastic
Spring 2007
48
procedure for the cross-fosterlings. It slowed the growth of their sign
language, but it certainly demonstrated that sign language became a
permanent and robust aspect of their lives.
Semantic Range
The first objective of vocabulary tests (B. Gardner & Gardner,
1989; R. Gardner & Gardner, 1984) was to demonstrate that chimpanzees
could communicate information under conditions in which the only source
of information available to a human observer was the signing of the
chimpanzees. Washoe, Moja, Tatu, and Dar accomplished this by naming
pictures that were out of sight of their human interlocutors. An equally
important objective of these tests was to demonstrate that the signs of the
cross-fosterlings referred to natural language categories - that DOG
referred to any dog, FLOWER to any flower, and so forth. The
chimpanzees accomplished this by naming a varied set of exemplars
selected from a large library of photographs. In the tests, each slide
appeared once and once only so that each trial was a first trial (B. Gardner
& Gardner, 1989; R. Gardner & Gardner, 1984). That is to say, on each
trial the chimpanzees named a picture of an object that they had never
seen before.
Cross-fosterlings did well on these tests, but they also made errors.
In forced-choice tests of understanding, as for example, when subjects
must choose between a few plastic tokens (Premack, 1971) or a few
pictures on a testing board (Savage-Rumbaugh, McDonald, Sevcik,
Hopkins, & Rubert, 1986). In productive tests, errors contain information
because subjects are free to choose their own errors. Signing chimpanzees
can produce with their own hands any sign or combination of signs in their
vocabularies at any time. Most errors on vocabulary tests depended on
semantic relationships among the objects in the pictures, or form
relationships among the signs. Thus, DOG was a common error for a
picture of a cat, SODAPOP was a common error for a picture of ice
cream, and so on. Meanwhile, signs formed on the nose such as BUG and
FLOWER were common errors for each other, as were signs made by
touching one hand with the other such as SHOE and SODAPOP (R.
Gardner & Gardner, 1984, pp. 393-398).
Semantics and form also governed dithering between signs when a
cross-fosterling was uncertain about an answer. When two signs such as
WHITE DOG appeared in a reply, only one of the signs named an object
so scoring was unambiguous. Although we discouraged Washoe, Moja,
Washington Academy of Sciences
49
Pili, Tatu, and Dar from answering with strings of guesses in ordinary
conversation (B. Gardner, Gardner, & Nichols, 1989, pp. 82-83), they
sometimes dithered between alternatives and 14% of the replies on the
vocabulary tests contained more than one object name. The observers only
reported one of these object names as the scorable reply, usually the first.
Later analysis showed that the chimpanzees were more likely to be
incorrect on these trials indicating that the dithering was a sign of
uncertainty. Most of these indecisive replies contained conceptually
related items such as CAT and DOG or similar forms such as BUG and
FLOWER. Sometimes, the dithering consisted of a string of related signs
such as when Washoe signed CAT, BIRD, DOG, MAN for a picture of a
cat, FLOWER, TREE, LEAF, FLOWER for a picture of daisies, or when
she signed OIL, BERRY, MEAT - all signs made by grasping different
places on the passive hand - for a picture of frankfurters (R. Gardner &
Gardner, 1984, p. 398).
Broader Categories
Daisies are flowers, flowers belong to a broader category of
botanicals such as trees and leaves, and botanicals are objects as
distinguished from actions or traits. Appropriate answers to Wh-questions
depend on membership in these broader semantic categories. In published
film (R. Gardner & Gardner, 1973; 1974), Greg asks Washoe a series of
questions about her red boot. Her reply to WHAT THAT? is SHOE, to
WHAT COLOR THAT? is RED, and to WHOSE THAT? is MINE. If, for
example, she had replied GREEN when asked WHAT COLOR THAT of
her red boot, she would have been incorrect, but her reply would still be
appropriate to the question in a way that replies such as GREG or HAT or
MINE would be inappropriate. Brown (1968), Ervin-Tripp (1977), and
Veneziano (1985) used the replies of human children to Wh-questions to
show that children use different functional categories of words as sentence
constituents.
B. Gardner and Gardner (1975) and Van Cantfort et al. (1989)
embedded a systematic series of Wh-questions in the daily conversational
interactions between adults and cross-fostered chimpanzees. The
experimental questions restricted appropriate replies to one of a
predefined set of semantic categories. At the same time, all possible
replies were assigned unambiguously to exactly one semantic category.
Van Cantfort et al. (1989) analyzed a longitudinal series of Wh-
questions that started when Moja, Tatu, and Dar were between 18 and 20
Spring 2007
50
months old and continued through their first five years. As children grow
older, the percent of replies to questions increases together with the
percent of appropriate replies. Moja, Tatu, and Dar progressed in the same
way (Van Cantfort el al, 1989, pp. 229-234, Figures 5.1 and 5.2). The
cross-fosterlings also mastered particular kinds of Wh-questions in a
sequence like the sequence reported for children. Both children and
chimpanzees, initially provide nominals for What questions and locatives
for Where questions. Later they provide verbs for What-do/predicate
questions and proper nouns and pronouns for Who questions, and still
later appropriate replies to Whose questions (for children see Ervin-Tripp,
1970, p. 105; for chimpanzees see Van Cantfort el al, 1989, pp. 234-236,
Tables 5.16 and 5.17). Finer distinctions between the major interrogatives
yield still finer parallels. For example, both children and chimpanzees
provide appropriate replies to Who subject questions earlier than Who
object questions (for children see Ervin-Tripp, 1970, p. 89; for
chimpanzees see Van Cantfort et ai, 1989, Tables 5.7 and 5.9).
Functional categories also determined errors. As in vocabulary
tests, Wh-question tests were productive tests and Washoe, Moja, Tatu,
and Dar could respond with any item in their vocabulary. They could
create their own errors and errors could be factually incorrect, yet
functionally appropriate to the Wh-question. For example, the reply
STRING to the question WHAT NAME THAT of a white leather belt,
was factually incorrect with respect to the object, but functionally
appropriate with respect to the question. Meanwhile, the reply WOOD to
the question WHAT NAME THAT of a metal bell was both factually
incorrect with respect to the object and functionally inappropriate with
respect to the question. Gardner, Van Cantfort, and Gardner (1992)
showed that 92% of Washoe's factually incorrect replies, 72% of Moja's,
82% of Tatu's, and 69% of Dar's were, nevertheless, functionally
appropriate to the Wh-question.
Developmental Patterns
Gradually and piecemeal, but in an orderly sequence, the language
of human toddlers develops into the language of their parents. Cross-
fostered chimpanzees developed their sign language gradually along with
the rest of their socialization - tool use, toilet training - in a nearly human
household under nearly human conditions. The topics of their
conversations resemble the topics of human conversations because they
had the same things to talk about under nearly the same conditions.
Washington Academy of Sciences
51
Patterns of development resembled human patterns. Growth in
skill, though slower than human, remained parallel as long as they
remained under cross-fostering conditions. Well -documented records of
human development provide a scale for measuring the progress of cross-
fostered chimpanzees.
Nelson (1973) measured overlap from child to child in the first 50
words of the spoken vocabularies of human children. B. Gardner and
Gardner (1980) showed that the first 50 signs in the early vocabularies of
Moja, Pili, Tatu and Dar overlapped with the vocabularies of human
children as much as Nelson's (1973) child vocabularies overlapped with
each other from child to child.
The first two-word phrases of human children represent basic
semantic relations. Studies of human children generally agree that the
major semantic relations appear in a characteristic developmental
sequence (Bloom 1991, Bloom et al 1975, Braine 1976, Leonard 1976,
and Wells 1974, De Villiers and De Villiers 1986, 50-51, Reich 1986, 83).
Nominative phrases and action phrases appear first. Next come attributive
phrases expressing the properties of objects (attribution, possession,
location). Experience/notice phrases are relatively late in child
development. With respect to negatives and requests studies of children
have so far either failed to report developmental order or reported
inconsistent orders. B. Gardner & Gardner (1998) showed that semantic
relations appeared in the same sequence in the development of Moja, Tatu,
and Dar. Nominative and action phrases appeared first, attributives
second, and experience/notice appeared latest in the developmental
samples of each chimpanzee - the same sequence that appears in studies
of child development.
Rimpau, Gardner, & Gardner (1989) and Chalcraft & Gardner
(2005) showed that Dar and Tatu, in conversation, used ASL inflections to
indicate person, place, and object. Chacroft & Gardner (2005) also
showed that Dar used ASL inflections to indicate intensity.
Bloom (1991, 1993), Brinton and Fujiki (1984), Ciocci and Baran
(1998), Garvey (1977), Halliday and Hasan (1976), and Wilcox and
Webster (1980) described the ways human adults and children use
expansion, reiteration and incorporation to maintain interactions. Bodamer
and Gardner (2002) and Jensvold and Gardner (2000) studied replies of
cross-fosterlings to conversational probes of a human interlocutor. When
appropriate, Washoe, Moja, Tatu and Dar incorporated signs from the
Spring 2007
52
probes of their interlocutors into their own rejoinders. In response to
probing questions they clarified and amplified their own previous
responses by expanding on the signs in the probes. Cross-fostered
chimpanzees used expansion, reiteration, and incorporation the way
human adults and human children use these devices. Their contingent
rejoinders maintained the interaction and the topic of the interaction.
Shaw & Gardner (in press) showed that Washoe, Moja, Tatu, and
Dar coordinated their gaze direction with conversational turn taking.
Patterns of gaze direction and turn taking resembled adult human patterns.
As infants their immature patterns resembled those of human infants.
Their patterns of development from infant to adult also resembled human
patterns. All results support the conclusion that Washoe, Moja, Tatu, and
Dar engaged in human-style conversations with human-like growth and
development.
Trends and Predictions
Cohen (1982, p. 41-46) relates the historical rise of numeracy to
growing interest in processes, trends and predictions.
Before the seventeenth century in Europe, the order of the cosmos
was dictated by classical and, specifically, Aristotelian systems of
classification. All aspects of life and nature were comprehensible through
the arrangements of categories meant to exhibit significant distinctions
and to exhaust the possibilities of reality. The world was composed of four
substances, the body had four humours, the life of man was framed by the
seven stages of the aging process, and so on. The penchant for
classification remained alive in the seventeenth century and found full
expression in the Great Chain of Being, an idea that expressed the
relations among all creatures on earth and in heaven by making explicit an
assumed hierarchy of the natural and supernatural worlds. . .
.Classification by categories is a reasonable method for ordering static
things . . . (p. 44)
Cohen goes on to show how scientists and social leaders
discovered that comparable measures over time reveal patterns of flux and
change. Numerate scientists and citizens can study the motion of bodies
and trends in births, deaths, trade, weather and a virtually unlimited world
of variables. By studying variation over time they could detect underlying
functions and make reasonable predictions of future events. Eventually,
this became commonplace in most natural sciences.
Washington Academy of Sciences
53
By measuring patterns of growth and development rather than
static modules we can make predictions about more extended sign
language studies of cross-fostered chimpanzees. More advanced
developments appeared with each succeeding year of cross-fostering.
Proof that Moja, Tatu, and Dar had not yet reached any limit at three years
is their growth during the fourth year. Proof that they had not yet reached
a limit at four years is the growth during the fifth year. Nevertheless, after
three years of cross-fostering, they had clearly fallen behind human three-
year-olds, and they fell farther behind after four years, and still farther
behind after five years. From this we can predict that the chimpanzees
should be even farther behind human children after six years of cross-
fostering, but by the same token, we can predict that at six they should
achieve more than they achieved at five.
At three, retarded human children are significantly behind normal
three-year-olds. Retarded children at five are farther behind normal five-
year-olds, and at eight still farther behind normal eight-year-olds. But, it
would be a mistake to predict that intellectual development stops before
sexual maturity (Stephens, 1974; Zigler & Hodapp, 1986). Sign language
studies of cross-fostered chimpanzees reveal robust growth and
development. They promise that much more can be accomplished in future
studies with long-term support.
Spring 2007
54
References
Bloom. Lois (1993). The transition from infancy to language. New York: Cambridge
Uni\ ersit>' Press.
Bloom. L.. Lightbown. P.. & Hood. L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language.
Monograplis of tlie Societs for Research in Clrild De\ elopment. 40 (2) Ser. No.
160.
Bloom. L. (1991). Language de\ elopment from two to three. New York: Cambridge
Universib Press.
Bodamer. M.D.. & Gardner. R.A. (2(X)2). How Cross-Fostered Chimpanzees Initiate and
Maintain Conversations. Journal of Comparative PsvchologN . 1 16. 12-26.
Bonvillian. J.D.. Nelson. K.E.. & Cliarrow. V.D. (1976). Language and language-related
skills in deaf and hearing cliildren. Sign Language Studies. 12. 211-250.
Braine. M.D. (1976). Cliildren's first word combinations. Monograplis of the Socieb for
Research in Cliild Development. JT (L Serial No. 164). 1-96.
Brinton. B.. & Fujiki. M. (1984). Development of topic manipulation skills in discourse.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 27. 350-358.
Brinton. B.. Fujiki. M.. Loeb. D. F.. & Winkler. E. (1986). Development of
com ersational repair strategies in response to requests for clarification. Journal
of Speech and Hearing Researcli 29. 75-81.
Brinton. B.. Fujiki. M.. Winkler. E.. & Loeb, D. (1986). Responses to requests for
clarification in linguistically nonnal and language-impaired cliildren. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Disorders. 51. 370-378.
Browa R. (1968). The de\’elopment of wh questions in cliild speech. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior. 7. 277-290.
Clialcraft. V.J.. & Gardner. R.A. (2005). Cross-fostered cliimpanzees modulate signs of
American Sign Language. Gesture. 5. 107-131.
Ciocci. S. R . & Baraa J. A. (1998). Tlie use of com ersational repair strategies by
cliildren who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf. 143. 235-245.
Cohea P. C. (1985). A Calculating People: Tlie Spread of Numerac^ in Early America.
Cliicago: Uni\ ersit> of Cliicago Press.
De Villiers. J.. & De Villiers. P.A. (1978). Language acquisition. Cambridge. MA:
Han ard Universit> Press.
De Villiers. J.G.. & De Villiers. P.A. (1986). Tlie acquisition of Englisli In D.I. Slobin
(Ed.). The crosslinguistic stud\ of language acquisitioa (Vol. 1. pp. 27-139).
Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
En in-Tripp. S. (1970). Discourse agreement: How cliildren answer questions. In J.R.
Haves (Ed.). Cognition and the development of language, (pp. 78-106). New
YoiL: Wiley .
En in-Tripp. S. & Mitchell-Kemaa C. (1977). Child discourse. New Yoric: Academic
Press.
Fouts, R.S. (1972). Use of guidance in teacliing sign language to a chimpanzee. Journal
of Comparative and Physiological Ps\ cholog^ . 80. 515-522.
Fouts. R.S., & Fouts. D.H. (1989). Loulis in conversation with the cross-fostered
chimpanzees. In R.A. Gardner. B.T. Gardner & T.E. Van Cantfort (Eds.),
Teaching Sign Language to Cliimpanzees. Albany. NY: SUNY Press.
VN^shington Academy of Sciences
55
Fouts. R.S.. Fouts. D.H.. & Van Cantforl. T.E. (1989). The infant Loulis learns signs
from cross-fostered cliimpanzees. In R.A. Gardner. B.T. Gardner & T.E. Van
Cantfort (Eds.), Teacliing Sign Language to Cliimpanzees. Albany. NY: SUNY
Press.
Gardner, B. T. & Gardner, R. A. (1974). Comparing tlie early utterances of cliild and
cliimpanzee. In A. Pick (Ed.). Minnesota symposium on cliild ps\ cholog\ . (Vol.
8. pp. 3-23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gardner. B.T., & Gardner, R.A. (1975). Evidence for sentence constituents in the early
utterances of cliild and cliimpanzee. Journal of Experimental Psvcholog\ :
General. 104. 244-267.
Gardner. B.T.. & Gardner. R.A. (1980). Two comparative ps\chologists look at language
acquisition. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Cliild Language. (Vol. 2. pp. 331-369). New
York: Gardner Press.
Gardner. B.T.. & Gardner. R.A. (1988). The role of cross-fostering in sign language
studies of cliimpanzees. Human Evolution, 3, 65-79.
Gardner. B.T.. & Gardner, R.A. (1989). A test of communication. In Gardner. R.A..
Gardner. B.T.. & Van Cantfort. T.E. (Eds). Teacliing sign language to
chimpanzees. Albany : SUNY Press.
Gardner. B.T., & Gardner, R.A. (1998). Development of plirases in the early utterances
of cliildren and cross-fostered cliimpanzees. Human Evolution. 13. 161-188.
Gardner, B.T.. Gardner. R.A.. & Nichols. S.G. (1989). The sliapes and uses of signs in a
cross-fostering laboratory . In Gardner. R.A.. Gardner, B.T.. & Van Cantfort.
T.E. (Eds). Teacliing sign language to chimpanzees. Albany : SUNY Press.
Gardner. R.A.. & Gardner, B.T. (1973). Teacliing sign language to the cliimpanzee.
Washoe (16 imn sound film). State College, Pa.: Psychological Cinema
Register.
Gardner. R.A.. & Gardner, B.T. (1974). L'enseignement du langage des sourds-muets ...
Washoe. In E. Morin and Piattelli-Palmarini (Eds.). L’Unit. de riioimiie. (pp.
32-36). Paris: Seuil.
Gardner. R.A.. & Gardner. B.T. (1978). Comparative psychology and language
acquisition. In K. Salzinger and F. Demnark (Eds.). Psy chology : The state of the
art. Annals of tlie Neyv York Academy of Sciences. 309. 37-76.
Gardner, R.A., & Gardner. B.T. (1984). A vocabulary test for cliimpanzees. Journal of
Comparatiy e Psychology . %. 381-404.
Gardner, R.A.. & Gardner. B.T. (1989). A cross-fostering laboratory . In Gardner. R.A..
Gardner. B.T.. & Van Cantfort. T.E. (Eds), Teacliing sign language to
chimpanzees (1-28). Albany: SUNY Press.
Gardner, R.A. Van Cantfort. T.E. & Gardner, B.T. (1992). Categorical replies to
categorical questions. American Journal of Psychology . 105. 27-57.
Gan ey, C. (1977). Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In E. Oclis. & B.
Scliieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 363-372). Neyv York:
Academic Press.
Goodall. J. (1986). Tlie cliimpanzees of Gombe. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press.
Goodman. M. (1976). Toward a geneological description of tlie primates. In M.
Goodman & R. E. Tasliian (Eds.). Molecular antliropology . (pp. 321-353). Neyv
York: Plenum Press.
Halliday , M. A. K., & Hansen, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Spring 2007
56
Hayes. K.J.. & Hayes. C. (1951). The intellectual cle\ elopment of a home-raised
cliimpanzee. Proceedings of tlie American Pliilosopliical Socich . 95. 105-109.
Jensvold. M.L.J.. & Gardner. R. A. (2000). Interactive use of sign language by cross-
fostered cliimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1 14. 335-346.
Kellogg. W. N. & Kellogg. L. A. (1933/1967). The ape and the cliild: A Stud^ of
em ironmental influence upon early beha^•ior. New York: Hafner Publisliing Co.
Kellogg. W.N. (1968). Communication and language in tlie home-raised cliimpanzee.
Science. 162. 423-427.
Leonard. L.B. (1976). Meaning in child language. New Yoric: Grune & Stratton.
Lewontin. R. (1991). Biolog\ as ideolog^ . HarperCollins Publishers. Inc.
Maestas y Moores. J. (1980). Early linguistic environment: Interactions of deaf parents
with their infants. Sign Language Studies. 26. 1-13.
Maple. T. L. & Cone. S. G. (1981). Aged apes at tlie Yerices Regional Primate Research
Center. Laborators Primate Newsletter. 20. 10-12.
Moerk. E.L. (1983). The mother of E\’e — as a first language teacher. Nonvood. NJ:
ABLEX Pubhshing Corporation.
Nelson. K. (1973). Structure and strateg> in learning to talk. Monograph of the SocieU
for Research in Cliild Development. 38. (1-2. Serial No. 149). 1-137.
Premack. D. (1971). On the assessment of language competence in tlie chimpanzee. In A.
Sclirier & F. Stollnitz (Eds.). Beliavior of nonliunian primates. (Vol. 4. pp. 185-
228). New York: Academic Press.
ReicL P.A. (1986). Language development. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rimpau. J.B.. Gardner. R.A.. & Gardner. B.T. (1989). Expression of person, place, and
instrument in ASL utterances of cliildren and cliimpanzees. In Gardner. R. A..
Gardner. B.T.. & Van Cantfort. T.E. (Eds). Teacliing sign language to
cliimpanzees. Albany: SUNY Press.
Roacli. J. 2003 (May. 9).Tarzan 's Cheetahs life as a retired movie star. National
Geographic Ne^'s. Retrie\’ed from
http://news.nationalgeographic.coni/news/2003/05/0509_030509_clieeta.htnil.
Saricli. V. M. & Cronin. J. E. (1976). Molecular s>'stematics of tlie primates. In M.
Goodman & R. E. Tashian (Eds.). Molecular anthropolog^ . (pp. 141-170). New
Yoiic: Plenum Press.
Savage-Rumbaugli. E.S.. McDonald. K.. Sevcik. R.A.. Hopkins. W.D.. & Rubeil E.
(1986). Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pigmy
chimpanzees. Journal of Experimental Psvcholog\ : General. 1 15. 211-235.
Shaw. H.L. and Gardner. R.A. (in press). Human patterns of gaze direction and
conversational turn-taking in conversations of cross-fostered chimpanzees.
Snow. C. (1972). Mother's speech to children learning language. Child Development 43.
549-565.
Snow. C.E.. & Ferguson. C.A. (Eds.) (1977). Talking to children. Cambridge: Cambridge
Uni\’ersit> Press.
Stanyon. R.. Chiarelli, B.. Gottlieb. D., & Patton. W.H. (1986). The phylogenetic and
ta.xonomic status of Pan paniscus: A chromosomal perspective. American
Journal of Physical Antlu^OIX)log^ . 69. 489-498.
Stephens, B. (1974). Symposium: Developmental gains in the reasoning, moral
judgement, and moral conduct of retarded and nonretarded persons. American
Journal of Mental Deficient . 79. 113-161.
Washington Academy of Sciences
57
Swain. R.L. (1968). Why the language of signs is being taught to a cliimpanzee at the
UniversiU of Nevada. The Deaf Americaa 21. 5-7.
Swain. R.L. (1970). Washoe's ad\’anced training in the language of signs. The Deaf
American. 22. 9-12.
Tinbergen. N. (1953b). Social behaviour in animals. New York: Jolm Wiley & Sons.
Van Cantfort. T.E., & Rimpau. J.B. (1982). Sign language studies with cliildren and
cliimpanzees. Sign Language Studies. 34. 15-72.
Van Cantfort. T.E., Gardner. B.T., & Gardner. R.A. (1989). Developmental trends in
replies to Wh-questions by cliildren and cliimpanzees. In Gardner. R.A..
Gardner. B.T.. & Van Cantfort. T.E. (Eds), Teacliing sign language to
cliimpanzees. Albam : SUNY Press.
Veneziano. E. (1985). Replying to mothers' questions. Journal of Pragmatics. 9. 433-452.
Wells. G. (1974). Learning to code e.xperience dirough language. Journal of Cliild
Language. L 243-269.
Wilcox. M. J.. & Webster. E. J. (1980). Early discourse behavior: An analysis of
children's responses to listener feedback. Cliild De\ elopment. 51. 1120-1125.
Yerkes. R.M. & Yerkes, A.W. (1929). The great apes: A stud^ of antliropoid life. New
Haven: Yale Universit\ Press.
Zigler. E., & Hodapp. R.M. (1986). Understanding mental retardation. New York:
Cambridge Universit> Press.
Spring 2007
Tliis page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
59
SPORT AND MEDICINE DURING GREEK ANTIQUITY
AND ROMAN IMPERIAL TIMES
Onoufrios Pavlogiannis**
Constantina Lomi
Evangelos Albanidis
Spiros Konitsiotis
Stephanos Geroulanos
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between gymnastics and
medicine using literary^ sources from the Greco-Roman period.
Throughout ancient Greek literature gy mnastics was presented in
relation to medicine. Gymnasts were not always distinguished
from physicians. Gymnastics was thought to protect from disease
and to promote health. Members of the Hippocratic School were
the first to state that man’s health depends on a balance between
diet and exercise. Plato’s works verified the synergistic effects of
g> mnastics and medicine to psychophysical balance. According to
Aristotle, medicine and gymnastics contributed to the
development of a discourse on matters related to health, w hich
promotes human felicity , happiness, and balance of life. In the
Roman Empire gy mnastic practices changed and championship-
aimed training prevailed. This did not respect man’s natural
idiosyncrasy and became dangerous to health. Exhausting training
and the lack of harmony and symmetry in training endangered the
health of athletes. Within this framework, the need for a qualified
physical trainer monitoring exercise was obvious. He should have
the ability to assess the various exercises, and to test the
usefulness or risk of different forms of exercise. Consequently,
the physical trainer needed to have medical knowledge and also to
know how to practice medicine.
** Onoufrios Pavlogiannis, Ph.D., is at the Dept, of New Teclmologies and Handing of
Cultural Enviromnent. University^ of loannina. Greece. C. Lomi, PT. Lie. Med. Res., is in
the Dept, of Physiotherapy, Onassis Cardiac Surgery^ Center, Athens. E. Albanidis. M.D.,
Ph D., is in tlie Dept, of Physical Education & Sport Science, Democritus University of
Thrace. S. Konitsiotis, M.D., Ph D., is in tlie Dept, of Neurology' and S. Geroulanos.
M.D., Ph D., is in tlie Dept, of History of Medicine, botli at the University of loannina,
Greece.
Spring 2007
60
Interest in medicine was strong and constant in Antiquity.’
Medicine was characterized by a reflection on human nature and an
increasing ability to diagnose and treat different diseases. This
included the development of a new discipline of the matters related to
health which was of a clear preventive nature." The consequences of
the social and political life on the human soul and body accounts for
the development of ethics and at the same time required consideration
of matters related to health. That is the ability to balance the health-
diet relationship, which resulted in the formulation of daily preventive
rules."’ It is obvious that a moderate and happy life depends on the
existence of the ‘art of healthiness’ which takes care of the human
body and its movements, is interested in the relationship between the
body and external variables and ultimately takes care of man’s
health.’' Under these circumstances, gymnastics or physical training
was presented as related to medicine, and physical trainers were not
necessarily distinguished from physicians. Because of the need to
control physical exercise, physical trainers needed to know the
theories of anatomy and physiology. Because of their desire to
practice the art of the body in a proper way, gymnasts needed to be
knowledgeable about the result of gymnastic exercises and other
auxiliary hygienic practices.'
The rise of medical literature was associated in Antiquity with
creation of a class of professional physicians and the need to transmit
medical knowledge and make it known to a wider public.'’ Especially in
the Roman Empire, the need to return to past practices was characteristic
of the so-called Second Sophists. These philosophers contributed to the
redefinition of the art of gymnastics.'” The first ancient Greek treatises on
gymnastics were written in the first centuries of the Christian era: 'About
gymnasia' by Lucian, ' Gymnastikos' by Philostratos, 'To Thrasyboulus: Is
healthiness a part of medicine or of gymnastics?' and 'The exercise with
the small ball' by Galen. In this group we can include 'Recommendations
for a healthy life' by Galen and Plutarch. All these works emphasized the
need to promote a form of “hygienic” physical training, which was
characterized by scientific training, the objective of promoting physical
and mental well being, and the rejection of malpractices.
The relationship between physical training and hygiene was
continuously promoted later on in the Greek world. Its basic
principles and its effects, often expressed in different ways, basically
remained the same but were better categorized in the Roman Empire.
Washington Academy of Sciences
61
The investigation into physical training and hygiene greatly
contributed to the understanding of the relationship between medicine
and gymnastics, and of the respective responsibilities of physicians
and physical trainers. According to the Greeks, medicine was a form
of higher education, equivalent to philosophy and rhetoric, and was
thus included among the ‘free arts.’'"*"
Medicine and Philosophy in Greek Antiquity
The relationship between philosophy and medicine had already
been discussed, defined, and researched within the boundaries of ancient
Greek civilization. Pre-Socratic thought constituted the basis on which
scientific medicine was built. The ‘care of self contributes to personal
health and depends on soul treatment as well as on protection of the body.^
Plato and the Hippocratic physicians confirm this common
opinion of philosophers and physicians, that the human person should
be viewed as a harmonious whole consisting of soul and body. This
defined the therapeutic means so that it would be most effective and
in turn act so as to further educate physicians and hygienists of the
entire ancient Greco-Roman times. The common ground of the two
arts becomes clearer if one considers how impulsiveness can stimulate
the soul and hence may cause physical diseases (“dyscrasy”), since
the body often cannot tolerate excessive desires of the soul.
Contrarily, uncontrolled impulses are likely to have a completely
different effect: they may develop within the body and disturb one’s
mental health.
In the Hippocratic School, medicine was defined for the first
time as an independent art dissociated from its philosophical origin.
Hippocratic physicians did not speak generally about human nature,
but observed accurately the individual idiosyncrasy of their patients.^"
A basic principle was the necessity of physical exercise.
According to Second Sophistic philosophers who healed the ‘sick’
soul, such role was given more emphasis than the role of the physician
who simply cured diseases and restored health. Consequently, it was
quite natural for a philosopher such as Epictetus to regard his school
as a place for the cure of the soul and he urged his students to show
empathy with their patients. The Greek physician Galen supported
this view, in which the physician appeared as a charismatic
personality with a high educational profile. Galen, in particular,
claimed that in his effort to explore the nature of the human body and
Spring 2007
62
the differences between several diseases, physicians needed to be
trained to astutely observe and apply his methods with diligence and
prudence, thereby using such philosophical disciplines as rationality,
ethics, and natural knowledge. Consequently the physician who
practiced his art according to principles was also a philosopher.^*'
According to Plutarch, the physician cannot perform his art without
philosophy and conversely the philosopher should not be accused
when dealing with matters of health.^' Also, according to the Roman
intellectual Celsus (30 B.C. - 50 B.C.), students of philosophy who
analyze physical phenomena, cure illnesses. Consequently many
philosophers acted as physicians. The practice of medicine was not
limited to healing illnesses. It had also a philosophical and human
dimension, generating a new attitude towards life by taking into
consideration external influences with the ultimate goal of proposing
rules for health preservation.
This relation of medicine to philosophy was considered of
most importance by Plutarch, who supported the view that medicine
was a synonym of ‘liberal arts,’ as it offers both health and
knowledge.
Medicine and Gymnastics in Greco-Roman Antiquity
According to Plato, education addressed the entirety of man,
that is, the inseparable association of body and soul, and consequently
required medicine and physical exercise.^" Knowledge of
gymnastics/physical exercise derives from the writings of physicians.
There are no books by physical trainers, instead such physicians as
Hippocrates or Galen, provide evidence about gymnastics and athletic
practices. Over time, however, medicine claimed to be scientific
whereas gymnastics/physical exercise developed as a “child-training”
art and as a discipline of “gymnastics-hygiene-dietetics. On this
basis the physician appeared as an expert on body issues such as
gymnastics.
Homer’s epics constitute an early source on medicine and
dietetics, although they report principally on injuries and their
treatment. The description of these injuries presupposed knowledge of
anatomy and wounds. Medicine was restricted to their cure by
operations performed manually and by drug prescription.^*^
During the period of the 1 f ^ - 8^^ centuries B.C. medicine has
a theocratic nature and is described as an art that cures sick bodies by
Washington Academy of Sciences
63
means of drugs and manual operations.'"’' In a time when physical
excellence was highly valued it is unlikely that diet and exercise
contributed to bodily health."’" The witness of sources who complain
about the lack of systematic exercise and the absence of physical
trainers in those times does not contradict the above."""
The term ‘physician,’ with all its load of special value (since
'doctors indeed are men worth thousands of others was given to
those charismatic and educated people who combined empirical
knowledge with theoretical education, and practiced the art of
medicine as the discipline that promoted and preserved health.
Cheiron, for example, who was responsible for Achilles’ education,
first fed him with honey and bone marrow and then tried to
familiarize him with javelin throwing and running. He also taught him
music, which relaxes impulsive behavior and taught him how to take
no interest in money. At the same time, Cheiron, known for his
wisdom, was a hunter, taught the art of war, and also trained
physicians and musicians.""*' Palamides’ advice, when great famine
threatened the Achaeans besieging Troy, is characteristic of the
relationship between medicine and gymnastics in the pre-classical
period. Having admitted that he had no medical knowledge, he urged
the Achaeans to take care of themselves, because he thought it was
really essential for them to eat well and to have intense physical
activity so as to be protected from epidemics.
In classical times, Socrates (470/69 - 399 B.C.), according to
Xenophon’s ‘Memorabilia,’ thought that physical well-being, as a
result of exercise, prevented diseases and physical disabilities. He
urged his students to look after themselves by selecting appropriate
exercises and using them so as to maintain their health.""'" The art of
gymnastics is described as somewhat similar to medicine.
Hippocratic physicians enounced the principles of dietetics as
able to define human behavior and protect health. They were the first
to write about the ‘physiology’ of exercise. They were required to
know the art of gymnastics and the relationship between exercise and
external variables, as well as the necessity to individualize training
beyond specific and strenuous exercises.""'"" Hippocratic physicians
formulated the everlasting principle according to which human health
depends on the balance between diet and exercise.""'^'" Medicine and
gymnastics act on the two bodily states, the unhealthy and the healthy
one. According to this, medicine aimed at interfering with the human
Spring 2007
64
body so as to change an unhealthy state into a healthy one. Exercise
on the other hand aimed at physical well being and the maintenance of
the present health. Thus, the two arts are presented as related arts
serving human health.
On the same issue Galen claimed much later that Hippocrates
and his successors were aware of both prevention and hygiene. They
adopted the term ‘medicine’ to characterize their practice because the
therapeutic part of medicine became more prominent. The in-depth
knowledge of physical exercise recommended by Hippocratic
physicians implied a deep relationship between exercise and medicine
and also resulted in showing that physical exercise not only ensured
well-being but also had a therapeutic effect. Hippocratic physicians
claim that exercise must differ from athletes’ practices, because the
latter often deviate from moderate exercise. Moreover, on the basis
of the Hippocratic physicians’ doctrine of humors (xpaoK;), according
to which health and disease depend on the equilibrated balance
between the four main humors of the body, gymnastics is closely
related to medicine because it maintains health and balance within the
human body.^^’"’
The association of medicine and gymnastics as well as their
contribution to the development of the recommendations for a healthy
life is particularly observable in Plato’s works. Although Plato
certainly did not practice medicine, he aptly analyzed medical topics
thanks to his knowledge of Hippocrates and Pythagoras.’'^^”
According to Plato, the maintenance and restoration of health and
physical strength were the subject matter of both gymnastics and
medicine. Both were regarded as noble arts, primarily thanks to
their role in maintaining the good state of the human body, and
therefore surpassing all arts, servile and humble. Plato contributed
to the development of an idea of an art of the human body, without
providing however a name for this art. He thought it sufficient to note
that it was divided into two parts, medicine and gymnastics, a division
that should separate also the competencies of physicians and
gymnasts. Plato stressed the value of gymnastics, which functioned
within the framework of Hippocratic dietetics. He considered
gymnastics responsible for the well being of the body and its natural
development, and distinguished it from medicine. He regarded
physical education as essential for young people, provided that it was
without the excesses and the dependences that characterize athletic
Washington Academy of Sciences
65
training. The parallel contribution of gymnastic and medicine to
the protection of psychophysical balance, a prerequisite for man’s
overall health, was confirmed by Plato’s work.
This relationship fostered the gradual development of the
theories and recommendations for a healthy life. Following
Hippocrates’ views, Plato reaffirmed that body and soul constitute a
harmonious entirety. Therefore, the education he proposed addressed
both body and soul.™'"
Aristotle’s writings also show an interest in health. Adopting
Plato’s views, Aristotle expressed his belief that there was only one
art concerning health, even though he accepted the naturalness of the
human body and investigated the operation of human movement.^™"
What was special, however, in Aristotle’s approach is the importance
attached to human felicity as the most perfect of all goods; that is;
what Aristotle called ‘act well’ and ‘live well.’™'' This ‘felicity’
could be approached through body harmony, which in turn
presupposed health, beauty and vigor. Of all these physical qualities
health appeared to be the most significant."' Medicine and gymnastics
both aiming at the harmony of the human body were two equal parts
of the art of healthiness. The aim of this art was to restore and
maintain health, which required both arts to be practiced in
moderation."'’ Aristotle himself condemned those physical trainers
who deviate from the real goal of health and resort to practices that
were detrimental to the human entity. In particular, he criticized the
cities that encouraged athletic activities at the expense of bodily shape
and development."'" Within this framework, medicine and gymnastics
seemed to cooperate in the development of a discourse on hygiene,
which promoted human felicity and ensured a happy life."'"’
Medicine and Gymnastics in the Roman Empire
The objective of an equilibrated life in society also required
the care of health. In the Roman Empire, bodily care, study of the
factors influencing health, and the demand for good health stimulated
thinking about healthiness and fostered the formulation of rules for a
healthy life. Concern about human body decline increased the
necessity of its systematic care."'’" Theories on health/hygiene in this
period are very important for the understanding of the relationship
between medicine and gymnastics, although the province of
Spring 2007
66
physicians and physical trainers seem not yet distinct, something that
witnesses a controversy between physicians and gymnasts.
The question whether “rules for a healthy life” belongs to
gymnastics or medicine is indicative of this controversy. It reinforced
the development of the art of healthiness/hygiene during the imperial
period. This attempt to question the realization of the goals of the
hygienic regimens in relation to the arts of medicine and gymnastics
offers Galen the opportunity to review long standing views on
healthiness/hygiene. He supports that there is only one 'creative ’ art
(«7coiqTiKf| T8xvr|») concerned with the body and he regards both
medicine and gymnastics as two parts of this one art.'^*'^ On the whole,
the discourse concerning healthiness during imperial times is fairly
complicated and worthy to be further investigated.
The dissolute life of the elite during the imperial period with
its consequences for the soul and the body justified the intervention of
physicians and physical trainers, as well as the gradual development
of philosophical thinking that took into consideration and analysis the
above facets. In the texts of the first centuries of the Christian era one
can see that taking care of oneself is expected to be of vital
importance for each individual citizen. The maxim ‘take care of
yourself («£auTOU 87cip8>t£io0ai») is emphasized. Many
philosophical sects of the first Christian centuries expressed this
particular demand for personal development within the boundaries of
a community and not out of social context, especially the new Stoics.
At the same time medical thinking developed. It aimed at
preparing the body in a way that its psychophysical harmony would
not be destroyed. Therefore, an art of health-diet was established: it
was a system of rules aimed at structuring human education, as well
as regulating man’s indulgence in daily pleasures in the most painless
way.^*'^" This ‘life education’ functioned within the conceptual
framework of health and aimed at rendering man autonomous,
(proactive, active, energetic, dynamic) and happy while reducing
external dangers. Body care appears mainly as an ‘art of living,’ based
on a system of rules that have to do with the prevention rather than
the cure of diseases. The specific practice of keeping certain rules
for a healthy life, required personal alertness as far as external factors
are concerned (such as climate, seasons, times, local customs,
pleasures, exercises, diet) as well as the almost obligatory association
of medicine and gymnastics. Every man was invited to seek the most
Washington Academy of Sciences
67
suitable practices for his body, especially when his health was in
excellent condition, with the aim of 'selecting the best way of life and
making it pleasant through practice.
On the same issue Galen’s point of view is quite interesting.
He stated that a healthy body, when accompanied by a prudent soul, is
led by natural desires and follows only what is useful to it.^ Celsus
provided some evidence for those people who got very tired after a
hard day. He suggested proper exercises, walks, massage, and baths.
Alternatively, those who have overindulged in food should not
undertake strenuous tasks or exercise.’*
These views about healthiness/hygiene in imperial times had a
further dimension. An irresponsible attitude in society offers only a
precarious and most-of-the-times meaningless satisfaction, whereas
planning life, preparation of the body, and self-restraint ensure health
and permit real and painless indulgence in pleasures. Within this
framework, the bodily exercise aimed at the purpose of maintaining
health was always timely.’"'
Within the art of healthiness/hygiene which fostered a
preventive behavior such as a diet, there was a need for therapy,
which was widely acknowledged in imperial times. The comparison
between the remedial methods of medicine and gymnastics along with
their effectiveness constituted speculative and controversial issues.
Philostratos, who is neither a physician nor a physical trainer, studied
the works of physicians, physical trainers and hygienists.’'' He
regarded the art of gymnastics as a combination of medicine and
‘"child-training,” superior to “child-training” and in any case a part of
medicine. In particular, he claimed that, while medicine can cure all
diseases, gymnastics can deal successfully with only some of them,
using diet and massage. What is interesting here is the emphasis on
the therapeutic nature of gymnastics.’' Special reference is also made
to the contribution of therapeutic gymnastics in situations of people
whose excessive or unorthodox training choices have resulted in
unpleasant physical states. Galen provides valuable information about
massage and exercise, which contribute to the cure of unpleasant
states caused by insomnia, anger, sorrow, indulgence in love making,
overeating or heavy drinking. He also reports the physical trainers’
views in order to support the appropriate preparatory or recovery
exercise as auxiliary remedial methods for the treatment of unpleasant
physical states.’'' Furthermore, the usefulness of gymnastics in
Spring 2007
68
treating the lack of harmony and symmetry in training is often
ascertained.*'" Indicative is the case of stout or skinny young men,
who are cured by means of relevant exercise. Finally the use of
exercise appears to be valuable for the treatment of athletes as well.
Galen claims that he treated athletes using exercises pertaining to
their sport and already used in their training context.*'"'
In this attempt to investigate the relationship between medicine
and gymnastics, Galen’s views, presented in 'Is healthiness a part of
medicine or of gymnastics," are of primary importance. *'"' A medical
and philosophical concept is proposed according to which there is a
single 'efficient' art about the body, the constituent parts of which are
medicine and gymnastics. What was new in this concept is the idea of
the necessary interaction between medicine and gymnastics, in order
to accomplish the primary aim of procuring and maintaining health
and secondly their melting into one art. This requires the rejection of
the idea that medicine’s unique aim is to maintain health, whereas
gymnastics aims solely at ensuring a good condition. Also rejected is
the idea about the existence of many more arts about the body. Good
physical condition, supposed to be the ultimate goal of gymnastics,
was identified with a healthy-looking body and the symmetry of its
parts. Correspondingly, good condition was the long and permanent
healthy state of the body. On the other hand, health, which is the
principal aim of medicine, requires energy and a perfect structure of
the body. Conversely, energy requires a perfect structure, similarly
absolute health involves good condition, and absolute good condition
requires health.
The qualities of the body as well as the arts serving these
qualities are limited, as are the goals. The aim of the art concerned
with the body is the ultimate virtue, namely the excellence of the
body. We may describe this aim using several terms, such as
perfection or good condition or health or physical structure or
physical energy. The choice of one or the other term, however, is not
so important. The ultimate good for the human body is its absolute
perfection, namely the coexistence and interaction of perfect health as
well as fitness and wellbeing. Health, strength and beauty constitute
body perfection, some of them being the causes and others the results
of this perfection. Therefore the factors that make a body perfectly
healthy are not different from those that make it strong and beautiful.
Health, strength, and beauty are either improved or deteriorated
Washington Academy of Sciences
69
together. Consequently, we refer to an art that focuses on the body.
This art is definitely beneficial to all three qualities (health, strength,
and beauty) even if it appears to benefit only one of them at a certain
time. In this way medicine and gymnastics are melted into one art
concerning the body. In other words, we accept that the application of
medicine and gymnastics respectively serves all three virtues. The
most important of these virtues is health followed by a sense of
wellbeing and beauty. In Galen’s thought it was proved therefore that
the art concerned with the body, whichever form this may take, is
concerned primarily with health and after all the absolute perfection
of the body is identified with health.
With regards to the relationship between medicine and
gymnastics, Galen suggests that it is impossible to have two different
arts, one responsible for the establishment of health and another one
for its maintenance. The criterion by which each art is defined is the
final result. Therefore, one could support the existence of specific
techniques (or specializations) for the care of the body. They should
be differentiated according to the diseases they cure, the methods or
the materials they use. They should all have a common goal, namely
health, and should therefore be parts of a single art. After all, what
really matters is not so much the establishment, the restoration or
even the maintenance of health, but health itself. Speculations about
the rules for a healthy life indicate that medicine and hygiene were
parts of one single art, and contributed to the constitution of an 'art of
bodily development, ’ which can restore the lack of harmony and
symmetry in training and the injuries of the body.*'^ This 'art of bodily
development'^' is divided into two parts, the healing or medical art,
which achieves major restoration and the preservative art, which deals
with minor restorations. This 'preservative art’ is further subdivided
into four parts, each one of which focuses on a particular aspect of
health, namely: 'the art of well-being,’ 'the art of recovery,’ 'the art
of healthiness’ and 'the prophylactic art.’ Gymnastics is part of this
'preservative art,’ which is also called 'healthiness.’*^"
Galen’s most significant suggestion is the issue of the
autonomous existence of the 'art of healthiness,’ which is
distinguished from the medical art and includes the rules for a healthy
life ('dietetics’) and 'gymnastics’ as its parts. In addition it is made
clear that although four arts deal with the care of the body (surgery.
Spring 2007
70
pharmacy, dietetics, and gymnastics), only the last two concern
healthy men.*^''
The Art of Physical Training or Gymnastics - The Educated
Physical Trainer
Understandably, gymnastics serves a good condition according
to nature, and is part of the art of healthiness. Besides, during
imperial times a large number of people, especially those of a higher
social status, exercised for their well being. Physical trainers with
knowledge and experience were asked to exercise/perform their duties
in order to preserve the qualities of the body; the preservation and
restoration of health. These practitioners were fully qualified
physical trainers who were capable of monitoring exercises aiming at
the sound development of the individual while also contributing to a
good control of professional, championship - aimed training.
With respect to the work of these physical trainers, it is
essential to stress two issues. First, special care had to be taken for
the selection of a ‘diet’ appropriate to the idiosyncrasy of each
individual. This rule dates back to Hippocrates. For Galen it was not
easy to suggest the best way of taking care of the body. This was
because there are body differences and consequently different
lifestyles. In another work Galen criticizes both physicians and
physical trainers for having written about the art of healthy life
without taking into account individual differences of the human
body.’^^ Secondly, we need to stress the contribution of systematic
exercise within the framework of a dietetic regime/system, and
therefore point out the importance of the physical trainer in relation to
the sensible application and use of exercise.
Furthermore, qualified physical trainers had to play a primary
role in championship - aimed training, which was very popular in the
Roman Empire, especially in the spectacular sports field and in the
use of unorthodox training methods. These facts influence the form
and the techniques used for coaching. Gymnastics of that time, which
in a derogatory sense is often called ‘training,’ is characterized by the
mistreatment of the athlete’s nature, the encroachment of the real aims
of gymnastics and the apotheosis of its exhausting nature.*^" Galen, in
particular, distinguishes ‘good condition according to nature’ from
‘athletic good condition,’ the latter being called ‘not natural
Washington Academy of Sciences
71
condition,’ and, also writes about ‘vicious condition,’ a state which
distorts the nature of gymnastics. In this way “child training” is
distinguished from gymnastics and therefore the empirical self-taught
trainer is distinguished from the qualified physical trainer.
The first to acknowledge the need for a clear distinction
between the empirical trainer and the qualified trainer and the degree
of cooperation between them was Aristotle. The physical trainer is
fully qualified, and should possess medical knowledge and knowledge
about hygiene. He should therefore be able to apply athletic exercise
in a proper manner and at the same time follow the hygiene regimes.
During imperial times the empirical trainer is regarded as a
technician, who can supervise the course of exercise, but cannot
propose or assess systems of exercise, since he does not have
sufficient knowledge of physical and external variables. Proposing
and assessing exercises is the responsibility of qualified trainers, who
have a sufficient knowledge of gymnastics and medicine and can
therefore monitor and plan exercise in a scientific way.'^‘^ In
particular he should have knowledge of:
• The theory of humors of the human body, that is the balance of
humors of the body in relation to the exercise and health of the
trainee. Knowledge of idiosyncrasy is of outmost importance
for a man to exercise as well as the potential negative impact
of any unplanned exercise on human nature. These are issues
that the trainer should be fully aware of in order to be able to
carry out his athletic or gymnastic program without any further
problems. For this reason Philostratos insists that the trainer
needs to take into consideration the different individual
constitution of the athletes during the implementation of
various coaching.
• The art of physiognomies, which means that he should be
capable of investigating and evaluating physical structure and
anatomic features and thus adapt exercise as needed.
• Individual physical states, so as to select proper exercises for
individual cases and prevent strenuous training.
• The special importance of exercise and auxiliary gymnastic
methods (such as massage, baths
72
• Monitoring procedures during the course of exercise’^^*' and its
duration/""'"'
• The relationship between external variables (climate, altimeter
etc) and gymnastic exercise, and the necessary adaptation of
the program/'"'"''’'
In conclusion, a thorough consideration of philological
testimonies from Roman imperial times shows that intellectuals of the
Roman era redefined gymnastics in relation to medicine and the art of
the rules for a healthy life in accordance with the classic beliefs of
Greek antiquity. Concurrently they accepted that the art of gymnastics
ought to ensure and maintain health. Furthermore they stressed that
the art concerned with gymnastics should be a part of the art of the
rules for a healthy life. In other words, they claimed that qualified
trainers need to have medical knowledge and also know how to
perform medical acts.
NOTES
* Information for this paper was collected from Homer (8^^ centur> B.C.).
Xenophon (between 430-425 - after 355 B.C.). Plato (427 - 347 B.C.),
Hippocrates (460 - 377 B.C.). Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.) and authors of the so-
called second Sophistic such as Galen (ca. 130 -ca. 200 A.D.). Philostratos
(end of the 2""^ centur\ - first half of the3rd centur\ A.D.). and Plutarch (ca. 50 -
after 120 A.D.).
" Literature concerning the t> pes of medical care, tlieir de\’elopment and consequences is
extensh e. Indicative are: Edelstein E. & L..Asclepius. A collection and
interpretation of the testimonies, Johns Hopkins Uni\’ersit>’ Press. Baltimore 1945:
Sigerist H.E.. A History of Medicine If Oxford UniversiU Press. Oxford 1961;
Castiglioni A.. Storia della Medicina. Mondadori. Milano 1948 (Greek translation
vol. 3 Atliens 1961), Kudlien F.. Eariy Greek primitive medicine. Clio Medica 3
(1968), 305-336. Staden H. von. Experiment and experience in Hellenistic medicine.
Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 22 (1975). 178-199, Gnnek M.D. &
Gourevitch D., Les E.xperiences pharmacologiques dans l’antiquite,.4rc/7/v^.9
Internationales d' Histoire des Sciences 35 (1985). 3-27. Krug A., Heilkunst und
Heilkult: Medizin in der Antique, Munchen. Beck 1993; lAoy&K^.Q., Methods
and Problems in Greek Science, Cambridge UniversiW Press. Cambridge 1991. Of
particular interest is the work of the well known Byzantine physician and writer
Oribasii who has collected passages of therapeutic surgical and dietetic practices
Washington Academy of Sciences
73
from ancient sources: Oribasii. Collectionum Medicarum Reliquiae (laipixai
lovaycoyai). Edidit I. Raeder. Aeu|/ia (1928-33).
In addition Foucault devotes two volumes to tliis topic: Foucault M.. Histoire de la
sexualite, L 'usage des plaisirs (2) pp. 1 19-166, Le souci de soi (3) pp. 47-164.
Gallimard. Paris 1984. And Brown P., The body and Society': Men, Women and
Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity, Columbia Uni\'ersit} Press, Ne\^ York
1988. Particularly for women: Gourevtch D.. Le Mai d'etre femme (La femme et
la medicine dans la Rome antique), “Les belles Lettres’', Paris 1984. Ancient
Greek sources include: Plutarch, Advice about keeping well, Epictetus,
Discourses, Galen, De sanitate tuenda.
" Pa\’logiannis O., The evolution of gymnastic and athletic ideals during Hellenistic and
Imperial years, Corfu / Greece [lonio Universit\ (diss.)] 2000, pp. 262-325 (in
Greek).
"" Plato, Gorgias 464b. npp>w Jaeger W., Paideia: The ideals of Greek Culture, pp.
27-69.
Krug A., Heilkunst und Heilkult: Medizin in der Antique, pp. 185-208, Jaeger
W., Paideia, 54-69.
Bowersock G.W., Greek Sophists and the Roman Empire, (O.xford 1969), Bowie
E.L., Greeks and their past in the second sophistic. P&P 46, 1970,
Touloumakos I., Contribution to the research of historic conscience of the
Greeks during the Roman sovereignty, (Athens 1972), pp. 57-92 (in Greek),
Andersson G., The second sophistic: a cultural phenomenon in the Roman
Empire, (London 1993), pp. 69-86, Pavlogiannis O., The evolution of
gymnastic and athletic ideals during Hellenistic and Imperial years, pp. 219-
231.
Plutarch. .4 about keeping well 122e. Cf. Bowersock G.W., Greek Sophists
and the Roman Empire, (Oxford 1969). p. 67.
Indicative are: Longrigg J.. Presocratic Pliilosophy and Hippocratic Medicine. History'
of Science 27 (1989), 1-39, Matthen M., Empiricism and Ontolog> in Ancient
Medicine, Medicine and Metaphysics: Apeiron XXI, 2 (1988), Edit. R.J.
Hankinson. Canada 1988, Lloyd R.E.G., Who is attacked in on Ancient Medicine,
Phronesis 17/7 (1963), 108-126, A8>vXf|c I., Democritian influences in the tliought of
Hippocrates, Skepsis: A journal for Philosophy and Inter-disciplinary Research XIII
-A7r 2002-2003 (Athens), 63-74, Bargeliotes S., Correlation. Aristotle's
contribution to the metliodological correlation betw een philosophy and medical art.
Skepsis: A journal for Philosophy and Inter-disciplinary Research XIII - A71 ' 2002-
2003 (Atliens). 254-264.
Foucault M., Histoire de la sexualite, Le souci de soi (3) pp. 47-82.
Plato. Phaedrus 270b, Timaeus 88b.
Jaeger W., Paideia, pp. 41-43.
See H. Reid. Atliletes as medicine for the health of the soul. Skepsis: A journal for
Philosophy and Inter-disciplinary Research XIII - A71 ' 2002-2003. 346-355.
See: Galen. Quod optimus medicus sit etiam philosophus, Epictetus, Discourses
II, 12-22, HI, 20-24.
^ Plutarch, Advice about keeping well 122d-e.
Celsus, On Medicine I, 5ff.
Spring 2007
74
A classic work in the field is: Marrou I.H.. Histoire de / 'education dans I'antiquite
(Greek translation Athens 1968). For the contribution of exercise in shaping
political consciousness and conduct see Miller S.. Naked Democracy, in Pol is
and Politics. Museum Tusculanum Press University of Copenhagen 2000. 277-
296. For first hand accounts see: Plato. Laws 728d-e. Statesman 306e-3 13c.
Timaeus 42. Gorgias 464a-b.
Aristotle. Politics 1338b[4-8].
Geroulanos S.. Bridler R. TRAUMA Wund-Entstehung und Wund Pflege in antiken
Griechenland. Pliilipp von Zabem. Mainz. 1994.
Homer. Iliad D2 1 Iff N207ff
See: Weiler I.. “AIEN ARISTEUEIN’. Stadion 1 (1975).
Galen. Thrasybulus or Is healthiness a part of medicine or of gymnastics?, XXXlll.
870.
Homer. ///WA5 14.
Philostratos. Heroic 708. 733.
Philostratos. Heroic 711.
^\XQno\A\on,Memorahilio\\\. 12. 1V.7.
Hippocrates. De diaeta. De diaeta salubri. De morbis popularibus 1. 111. Vll.
Prognosticon.
Hippocrates. De diaeta A, 2.
Galen. Thrasybulus XL Vll.
Hippocrates. Aphorismi 3-4. De alimento 34.
Krug A.. Heilkunst und Heilkult: Medizin in der Antique, pp. 53-58.
Plato. Timaeus.
X.X.XU1 pjg^Q Qorgias 503e-504c.
Plato. Gorgias 5l^a.
Plato. Gorgias 464a-b.
X.VXV1 Republic 404a-e.
X.XXV11 pjgjQ s 729d-c, Timaeus 42. 87d. Phaedrus 270b. The Republic 377a-b.
x.xxvm por example see: Aristotle. Metaphysics, Parts of Animals, Movement of
Animals, Progression of Animals, Mechanical Problems, Problems.
xxxix Aristotle. Politics 1332a.
^‘ Aristotle. Dialogi 45 [7(R2 41. R3 45. W7)].
Aristotle. Politics 13 35b [10- 15], Nicomachean Ethics 1 104[1 1-20].
Aristotle. Politics 1338b[9-ll].
Aristotle. Dialogi 52 [5(R3 52, \v5)].
xiiv xiiv pQyQgj^ ^ Histoirc de la sexualite, vol. 1-3. Gourevitch D.. Le Mai d'etre
femme (La femme et la medicine dans la Rome antique). (“Les belles Lettres”
1984).
See: Galen. Thrasybulus.
For example: Plutarch. Advice about keeping well; Epictetus, Discourse, Galen.
De sanitate tuenda.
Oribasios (1928), Collectionum medicarum reliquiae, pp. 106-148.
Pavlogiannis O., The evolution of gymnastic and athletic ideals during
Hellenistic and Imperial years, pp. 262-325.
Plutarch. .4 about keeping well 123.
Washington Academy of Sciences
75
' Galen. De sanitate tuencia IL 133.
Celsus. On Medicine I. 2.
Plutarch. about keeping well 125d. 127a.
‘“‘Galen. De sanitate tuenda IL 133ff.
Kitriniaris K.S., Philostratos Gymnastikos^ (Athens 1965). pp. 27-30 (in Greek).
Philostratos, Gymnastikos 14-16 (in Greek).
Galen. De sanitate tuenda III. 11. 253.
Oribasios (1808). pp. 11-113. Also see: Laskaratos J. / Marketos S.. The
Physical Education and the Athletics in the Ancient Greece. Materia Medica
Greca (6). 1981. 667-72 (in Greek).
Galen. De sanitate tuenda II, 158.
Galen. Thrasybulus II. 807(1-3).
Galen. Thrasybulus II. 807ff.
‘^‘Galen, Thrasybulus XXX. 861.
Galen, Thrasybulus XXX. 862(12-14).
Galen, Thrasybulus XXXI. 866-867.
Galen, Thrasybulus XXIV, 871(6-8).
Galen. De sanitate tuenda II, 82, III, 164.
‘^'‘Galen. De sanitate tuenda III. I36ff.
Paviogiannis O., The evolution of gymnastic and athletic ideals during
Hellenistic and Imperial years^ pp. 247-261.
Galen, Thrasybulus IX. 820.
Aristotle, Politics 1338b [5-35], Pliilostratos. Gymnastikos 14, Galen, Thrasybulus
XLIII. 888[14-16]. De sanitate tuenda II. 146-156.
Galen. De temperamentis 559ff, Philostratos, Gymnastikos 40,42.
ixxi piulostratos. Gymnastikos 25ff.
ixxii Philostratos. Gymnastikos 46-53. Galen, sanitate tuenda II, 130-131.
i.\.xin Philostratos, Gymnastikos 55-58. Galen, De sanitate tuenda II, III.
G2i[QYi. Hygienic Regimens B. 160-161.
Galen, De sanitate tuenda II, 1 36- 1 3 7, 154.
Galen, De sanitate tuenda II, 1 36- 1 37, 154.
Spring 2007
76
NEWS OF MEMBERS, FELLOWS, AND AFFILIATES
THE ANNUAL MEETING AND AWARDS BANQUET of the Washington
Academy of Sciences will be held on May 1, beginning at 6 PM, at
Meadowlark Botanic Garden in Vienna, Va. The cost is $52. For program,
directions, and information about making reservations, see
w^v^v washacadsci.org.
Michael p. Cohan, a WAS Fellow and past president, has been elected
to membership in the International Statistical Institute (ISI). Established in
1885, the ISI is one of the oldest scientific associations in the world. It is
composed of more that 2000 elected members, from more than 133
countries, who are internationally recognized as leaders in the field of
statistics.
John Margosian, a Life Member of the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers and an enthusiastic supporter of cooperation with
WAS, died in his sleep a few months before his birthday. The
Washington Section of the IEEE was planning to honor him at their
upcoming awards banquet on the April 28 with a special award for nearly
seven decades of dedicated and loyal service.
Thomas Meylan, WAS Vice President, with co-author Terry
Teays, has written Optiwizuig Luck: What the Passion to Succeed in
Space Can Teach Business Leaders on Earth. It will be published by
Davies-Black in November 2007.
THE WORLD FUTURE SOCIETY holds its 2007 annual meeting in
Minneapolis July 29-31. Sessions will cover technology, health,
governance, education, values, and social trends. Next year’s annual
meeting will be in Washington; planning for it is already underway. To
participate, or for more information see the web site, www.wfs.org.
The Council of Science Editors is organizing a Global
Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development in October 2007.
Science journals throughout the world will simultaneously publish papers
on this topic, to raise awareness and stimulate research into poverty and
human development. This is an international collaboration with journals
from developed and developing countries. They plan to publish original
research, review articles, editorials, perspectives, book reviews, and news
Washington Academy of Sciences
77
stories on the subject of poverty and human development. Some will
dedicate an entire issue to this subject, others will publish a few papers, or
an editorial. This Journal invites papers on this subject for its Fall
issue — tentative deadline for submission is September 15.
August 2004
78
AFFILATED INSTITUTIONS
The National Institute For Standards and Technology
Meadowlark Botanical gardens
The John W. Kluge Center of the Library of Congress
Potomac Overlook Regional Park
Washington Academy of Sciences
DELEGATES TO THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
REPRESENTING AFFILIATED SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America
American/Intemational Association of Dental Research
American Association of Physics Teachers
American Ceramics Society
American Fisheries Society
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
American Meteorological Society
American Nuclear Society
American Phytopathological Society
American Society for Cybernetics
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
American Society of Plant Physiology
Anthropological Society of Washington
ASM International
Association for Women in Science (AWIS)
Association for Computing Machinery
Association for Science, Technology, and Innovation
Association of Information Technology Professionals
Biological Society of Washington
Botanical Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
District of Columbia Institute of Chemists
District of Columbia Psychology Association
Eastern Sociological Society
Electrochemical Society
Entomological Society of Washington
Geological Society of Washington
Historical Society of Washington, DC
History of Medicine Society
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington Section
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Northern Virginia Section
Institute of Food Technologies
Institute of Industrial Engineers
Instrument Society of America
Marine Technology Society
Mathematical Association of America
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
National Capital Astronomers
National Geographic Society
Optical Society of America
Pest Science Society of America
Philosophical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Society of American Military Engineers
Society of Experimental Biolop^ and Medicine
Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Technology Transfer Society
Washington Evolutionary Systems Society
Washington History of Science Club
Washington Chapter of the Institute for Operations
Research and Management Science
Washington Paint Technology Group
Washington Society of Engineers
Washington Statistical Society
World Future Society
Paul Ajveson
J. Terrell Hoffeld
Frank R. Haig, SJ.
VACANT
Ramona Schreiber
David W. Brandt
Michael Greeley
Kenneth Carey
Steven Arndt
Kenneth L. Deahl
Stuart Umpleby
VACANT
Kimberly Hughes
Daniel J. Vavrick
Mark Holland
Marilyn London
Toni Marechaux
Emanuela Appetiti
Lee Ohringer
F. Douglas Witherspoon
Barbara Safranek
VACANT
Alain Touwaide
James J. Zwolenik
James J. Zwolenik
David Williams
Ronald W. Mandersheid
Robert L. Ruedisueli
F. Christian Thompson
Bob Schneider
VACANT
Alain Touwaide
Douglas Griffith
Gerard Christman
Murty Polavarapu
Isabel Walls
Russell Wooten
Hank Hegner
Judith T. Krauthamer
Sharon K. Hauge
Duane Taylor
Jay H. Miller
VACANT
Jim Cole
VACANT
Vary T. Coates
G. Foster
VACANT
Darren Roesch
VACANT
Bill Boyer
Clifford Lanham
Jerry L.R. Chandler
Albert G. Gluckman
Russell Wooten
VACANT
Alvin Reiner
Michael P. Cohen
Russell Wooten
T
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 637
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Return Postage Guaranteed
MEDIA MAI
U.S. POSTAC
PAID
MERRIFIELD
PERMIT NO.
ERNST MAYR LIBRARY
MUSEUM COMP ZOOLOGY
HARVARD UNIV'ERSITY
26 OXFORD ST
CAMBRIDGE. MA 02138-2902
MCZ
LIBRARY
Volume 93
Number2
Summer 2007
Journal of the
AUG 08 2D07
HARVARD
UNIVERSITY
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Contents
Editor’s Comments i
Instructions To Authors ii
James O’Connell, Faraday, Maxwell, and Lines of Force 1
Sean A. Genis and Carl E. Mungan, Orbits on a Concave Frictionless Surface 7
Julie Simon Lakehomer, A New Look at Mendel 15
Gene G. Byrd and Sethanne Howard, The Galaxy No One Wanted to See 33
Curtis Struck, Clouds of Moon Dust to Shade the Greenhouse 43
Joseph F. Coates, Book Review 57
Banquet 2007 63
Past President’s remarks 65
New President’s remarks 67
In Memorlam 73
ISSN 0043-0439
Issued Quarterly at Washington DC
Washington Academy of Sciences
Founded in 1898
Board of Managers
Elected Officers
President
Alain Touwaide
President Elect
Albert H. Teich
Treasurer
Russell Vane III
Secretary
James Cole
Vice President, Administration
Gerrald Christman
Vice President, Membership
Murty S. Polavarapu
Vice President, Junior Academy
Paul L. Hazan
Vice President, Affiliated Societies
E. Eugene Williams
Members at Large
Sethanne Howard
Donna Dean
Vary T. Coates
Frank Haig, S.J.
Peg Kay
Jodi Wesemann
Past President: Bill Boyer
AFFILIATED SOCIETY DELEGATES:
Shown on back cover
Editor of the Journal
Vary T. Coates
Associate Editors;
Sethanne Howard
Emanuela Appetiti
Elizabeth Corona
Alain Touwaide
Academy Office
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 631
1200 New York Ave NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202/326-8975
The Journal of the Washington Academy
of Sciences
The Journal is the official organ of the
Academy. It publishes articles on science
policy, the history of science, critical reviews,
original science research, proceedings of
scholarly meetings of its Affiliated Societies,
and other items of interest to Its members. It is
published quarterly. The last issue of the year
contains a directory of the current membership
of the Academy.
Subscription Rates
Members, fellows, and life members in good
standing receive the Journal free of charge.
Subscriptions are available on a calendar year
basis, payable in advance. Payment must be
made in U.S. currency at the following rates.
US and Canada $25.00
Other Countries 30.00
Single Copies (when available) 10.00
Claims for Missing issues
Claims must be received within 65 days of
mailing. Claims will not be allowed if non-
delivery was the result of failure to notify the
Academy of a change of address.
Notification of Change of Address
Address changes should be sent promptly to
the Academy Office. Notification should
contain both old and new addresses and zip
codes.
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to WAS, Rm.631,
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20005
Journal of the Washington Academy of
Sciences (ISSN 0043-0439)
Published by the Washington Academy of
Sciences 202/326-8975
email: was@aaas.org
website: www.washacadsci.ora
MCZ
LIBRARY
1
EDITOR’S COMMENTS
AUG 0 8 2007
HARVARD
The Annual Meeting And Awards Banquet, on
in this issue — marked the end of another very successful year for the
Academy, and with the installation of new officers also the beginning of a
year that should prove equally rewarding. It will include in March the
third of our biannual Capital Science Conferences, the planning of which
is well underway.
In the meantime, the work of the Academy does not stop during the
summer. Although there are no regular meetings of the Board of Managers
in July and August, member recruitment and fund raising efforts continue,
planning for Capital Science and for Junior Academy activities goes on,
this Summer issue of the Journal goes to press and work is underway to
complete the Fall issue. So as always we urge our readers to contribute
papers and book reviews relevant to their research or to broad scientific
issues, to volunteer to serve as paper reviewers, and to send us your
comments, criticisms, and suggestions for the Journal, and for other
activities of your Academy of Sciences.
Summer 2007
II
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
THE JOURNAL of the Washington Academy of Sciences is a peer-
reviewed journal. Exceptions are made for papers requested by the editors
or positively approved for presentation or publication by one of our
affiliated scientific societies.
We welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientific research reports
and papers on technology development and innovation, science policy,
technology assessment, and history of science and technology. Book
reviews are also welcome.
Contributors of papers are requested to follow these guidelines carefully.
• Papers should be submitted as e-mail attachments to the chief editor,
vcoates@mac.com, along with full contact information for the primary or
corresponding author.
• Papers should be presented in Word; do not send PDF files.
• Papers should be 6000 words or fewer. If more than 6 graphics are included the
number of words allowed will be reduced accordingly.
• Graphics must be in black and white only. They must be easily resized and
relocated. It is best to put graphics, including tables, at the end of the paper or in
a separate document, with their preferred location in the text clearly indicated.
• References should be in the form of endnotes, and may be in any style
considered standard in the discipline(s) represented by the paper.
Washington Academy of Sciences
1
FARADAY, MAXWELL, AND LINES OF FORCE
James O’Connell
Frederick Community College, Maryland
ABSTRACT
One hundred and fifty years ago, the physical chemist,
Michael Faraday first met the mathematical physicist Clerk Maxwell,
newly arrived in London. This essay traces the thought process that led
them to the development of electromagnetic theory using analogy,
symmetry, and the new applications of vector calculus. Faraday’s
experimental work on magnetically induced electric currents led him to
picture all electric and magnetic interactions as through lines of force.
Maxwell quantified this field theory by applying vector calculus. Two
of the resulting equations produced the conclusion that visible light is
an electromagnetic wave, whose velocity is given by the product of
electric and magnetic static-force constants.
THE BACKGROUNDS OF FARADAY AND MAXWELL
In the 19th century, Faraday was considered the world’s
greatest physics experimentalist and Maxwell its greatest physics theorist.
They were 40 years apart in age and light years apart in formal education.
In the Victorian period, a young man’s future was determined by his
father’s occupation and his family’s social rank. Faraday’s father was a
blacksmith and his family lived in a poor section, of London. Maxwell’s
father was an Edinburgh lawyer and his family held a high position in
society. Faraday was a self-taught chemist with rudimentary mathematical
skills. Maxwell was a Cambridge University graduate and a skilled
mathematical physicist. As different as they were in background and
temperament, the two scientists shared an intense desire to understand the
mysteries of the electromagnetic phenomena that Faraday had discovered,
but which he could only explain in qualitatively terms he called lines of
force.
FARADAY AT THE ROYAL INSTITUTION
Faraday, after a minimal amount of schooling, became an
apprentice to a bookbinder. But at age 21, following his interest in
Summer 2007
2
science, he became a chemical laboratory assistant to Sir Humphry Davy
at London’s Royal Institution. Eventually, Faraday began his own series
of chemical investigations that led to discoveries in chemical reactions and
in the new field of electrolysis. He established himself among the premier
experimentalists of the Victorian period.
FARADAY’S EXPERIMENTS WITH MAGNETIC FIELDS
Towards the end of his 50-year stay at the Royal Institution,
Faraday took up the study of magnetic fields from permanent magnets and
from electric currents. His most important discovery was the phenomena
of the creation of electric fields by changing magnetic fields. It had been
demonstrated by Oersted in 1821 that a current-carrying wire loop creates
a magnetic field around itself Ten years later Faraday’s demonstrated the
complementary process, namely a changing magnetic field through a wire
loop produces a current in the wire. This induced current implied that a
changing magnetic field creates its own electric field in space. Thus, time-
varying electric and magnetic fields were coupled.
Faraday was familiar with the well-known curved-lines pattern
created by sprinkling iron filings on a sheet of paper held over the poles of
a permanent magnet. This pattern suggested to Faraday the idea of
magnetic lines of force. The electric field between charged particles had
its own lines of force. Faraday’s lines of force eventually led to the
concept of electric and magnetic fields, as we know them today.
ASIDE ON ACTION-AT-A-DISTANCE AND LINES-OF-FORCE
Nineteenth century scientists were troubled by the concept that
forces between bodies acted instantaneously without any intervening
mechanism. This paradox was called action-at-a-distance. Since the time
of Newton, the gravitational force was considered to be action-at-a-
distance over the vast spaces between the Moon and Earth and between
the Earth and the Sun.
Field theory presented an alternative picture in which electric and
magnetic lines-of-force always existed between charges. The same type of
field could be true of the gravitational force between masses. In this
picture space is filled with force lines between objects interacting via the
three classical forces. When the charges or masses move the force lines
Washington Academy of Sciences
3
adjust their intensity and direction with a signal that travels along the
force lines at a finite speed.
MAXWELL’S MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION OF LINES
OF FORCE
The young Maxwell read and reacted to Faraday’s three- volume
book Researches in Electricity. Most university-based physicists had
ignored Faraday’s research because it lacked mathematical analysis.
However, Maxwell saw that Faraday’s concept of lines-of-force lent itself
to a mathematical treatment using vector fields. Maxwell developed his
concept in a series of three papers: Faraday’s Lines of Force (1857),
Physical Lines of Force (1862), and A Dynamical Theory of the
Electromagnetic Field (1864). His mathematics increased in complexity
with each paper from simple algebra, to calculus, to vector calculus
culminating in his famous set of four equations that describe the
interactions of electric and magnetic fields with each other and with
charges and currents.
Maxwell’s field equations formed the most elegant and useful
physics theory since Isaac Newton’s 1687 book Principia, which laid the
foundation of the theories of gravitation and mechanics. Indeed,
Maxwell’s 1873 summary book Treatise on Electricity is considered the
Principia of electromagnetic theory. Maxwell’s papers and book are
difficult to read today because of the manner in which he wrote his
equations. In fact. Maxwell wrote a second book. An Elementary Treatise
on Electricity without equations, to reach a broader audience. Oliver
Heaviside in 1884 recast Maxwell's mathematics into the now familiar
four compact vector equations.
MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND
Cambridge University in this mid-century period had a group of
mathematicians and physicists who had developed and used vector
calculus in the analysis of fluid and heat flow. The operators of gradient,
divergence, and curl found great utility in understanding fluid dynamics.
Maxwell realized that the curl operator acting on a field vector, V x V,
would be useful for developing the mathematical relationships between
electric and magnetic fields E and B. In particular, the lines of magnetic
force close on themselves, unlike electric force lines that began and ended
Summer 2007
4
on charges. It was the curl operator that made magnetic fields
mathematically tractable. For the interested reader not familiar with vector
calculus and traveling waves, an Appendix provides a brief tutorial on
these subjects.
MAXWELL’S EQUATIONS RELATING ELECTRIC AND
MAGNETIC FIELDS IN EMPTY SPACE
Maxwell intuited that electromagnetic fields in space were time-
dependent electric and magnetic fields. He described their relationships
with the equations
V X E = - 3B/at
V X B = |Xo£o aE/3t.
The second equation, with the time derivative of the electric field, was a
hypothesis based on symmetry with the first equation. These equations
show the “bootstrap” mechanism by which the two fields regenerate each
other as they propagate through space.
EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF ELECTROMAGNETIC
WAVE SPEED WITH THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT
A consequence of Maxwell’s field equations is that all
electromagnetic waves travel with a velocity given by l/(|io£o)^^^.
Maxwell made the further inspired guess that light was an
electromagnetic wave. The speed of light c had been measured by several
methods in the 19th century. A comparison with the measured values of po
and £o proved Maxwell correct, indeed c was numerically equal to
l/(po£o)*^^ within the experimental accuracy of the measurements of the
three constants.
Another property of an electromagnetic wave is the relation
between the magnitudes of the two fields, E = cB. The magnetic field,
measured in tesla, is 8 orders of magnitude smaller than the electric field,
measured in volts per meter. Heinrich Hertz verified electromagnetic
waves could be generated and detected as predicted by Maxwell.
Washington Academy of Sciences
5
OTHER FIELD THEORIES
Maxwell’s electromagnetic field theory, inspired by Faraday’s
magnetic experiments, became the model for modern-day field theories.
These theories include: quantum electrodynamics (QED) with photon
exchange between charges, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) with gluons
exchange between quarks, and quantum gravitational dynamics (QGD)
with graviton exchange between masses, a theory still in development.
THREE CONCLUSIONS ABOUT WHY FARADAY AND
MAXWELL WERE SUCCESSFUL
1. Faraday and Maxwell were well suited to their separate tasks in the
development of electromagnetic field theory: Faraday with his intuitive
lines-of-force picture and his experimental skills, and Maxwell with his
belief in Faraday’s picture and the mathematical skills to convert the fields
into equations. Other scientists were studying electric and magnetic fields
at this time, but none made the connections so well as Faraday and
Maxwell.
2. Cambridge and Scottish University mathematicians and physicists were
developing the mathematics of vector fields and applying it to fluid and
heat flow theories. Therefore, vector calculus was available for Maxwell
to use when he realized its utility to relate electromagnetic fields.
3. A number of scientists had measured the velocity of light c to sufficient
accuracy to make the comparison with the experimental values of 8o, the
permittivity, and jLlo, the permeability, of empty space to test the surprising
relationship between these three constants po^o = 1/c^.
APPENDIX
Vectors are directed line segments representing a field of some
physical quantity, for example force, velocity, or acceleration. In three
perpendicular dimensions, a vector can be written as the sum of three
independent one-dimensional components
V(x,y,z) = ivx + jvy + kvz.
In vector calculus the curl operator (in Cartesian coordinates) acting on a
vector is written as
V X V = i (3vz/3y - 3vy/3z) + ](dwjdz - dwjdx) + k(^Vy/^x - dvx/3y).
Summer 2007
6
In Maxwell's theor\\ when the curl operator acts on an electric field E(x,
V, r), it gives the time derivative of the magnetic field. WTien acting on a
magnetic field B(a% v, r) in free space, the curl gives the time derivative of
the electric field.
The expression for a time-dependent electric field of magnitude Eq
with wavelength X moving with velocity c in the direction v as a function
of time r is written as
E(a', r) = Eo sin[27r< X(.Y - ct)]
and a similar expression for the accompanying perpendicular magnetic
field B. Together these fields describe the movement of a wave of light
through space.
REFERENCES
1. Edmund Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity’, Vol. 1 Thomas
Nelson and Sons Ltd. London. 1951.
2. Robert D. Purrineton. Physics in the Nineteenth Centidn-, Rutgers Universits' Press,
1997.
3. Alan Hirshfeld. The Electric Life of Michael Faraday, Walker & Company, New
York. 2006.
4. Peter M. Harman. Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Max^velL Cambridge Universiu
Press, 1998.
Washington Academy of Sciences
7
ORBITS ON A CONCAVE FRICTIONLESS SURFACE*
Sean A. Genis and Carl E. Mungan
U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD
ABSTRACT
The equations of motion of a puck sliding frictionlessly inside a
parabolic bowl can be straightforwardly deduced using the
conservation laws of mechanical energy and angular momentum. But
the solution of these equations requires that they be recast into the form
of Newton’s second law. The simple example of a ball in vertical
freefall illustrates why this is necessary and how to perform the
conversion. The method is then applied to the richer problem of a puck
gliding on a paraboloidal surface for which the nonlinear equations
require numerical solution. A rich variety of orbital patterns of the
puck is found.
INTRODUCTORY EXAMPLE OF ONE-DIMENSIONAL
FREEFALL
Consider a ball thrown straight upward (which will be designated as
the +z direction) from the origin with an initial velocity of Let’s find
its resulting path of motion z{t) in the absence of air resistance. Because
mechanical energy is conserved (for the system of ball and earth), the sum
of the kinetic {K) and gravitational potential {U) energies at any point on
the ball’s path can be written as
K + U = (1)
where the subscript “0” throughout this article denotes the initial instant
/ = 0 . Choosing the gravitational reference position to be at the origin and
assuming the ball’s altitude never gets large compared to Earth’s radius,
Eq. (1) becomes
^Selected by the Chesapeake Section of the American Association of Physics Teachers as
the best student presentation at its spring 2007 meeting - Genis is a midshipman
majoring in physics and Mungan is a professor of physics.
Summer 2007
8
^ ml)l + mgz = ^ + 0
(2)
where m is the mass of the ball, g = 9.80 N/kg is Earth’s surface
gravitational field, and =dzl dt is the velocity of the ball. Equation (2)
can be rearranged as
2gz. (3)
dt
Unfortunately this equation is double-valued and cannot be uniquely
solved as written. At any given height z, there are two solutions, one
corresponding to the ball traveling upward with a positive velocity and the
other to the ball descending with an equal-magnitude negative velocity. In
order to circumvent this ambiguity, the time derivative of Eq. (3) can be
taken to produce the readily solvable form
^ dz^
\dt j
dt^
= -2g
^dz^
\dt /
az=-g
(4)
7 7
where a^=dzldt is the acceleration of the ball. The final equation is
simply Newton’s second law with the ball’s mass divided out of both
sides. Integrating it twice with respect to time gives the expected solution
In this easy example, one could alternatively solve Eq. (3) by manually
changing the sign of the square root of the right-hand side of the equation
after the topmost point of the trajectory is reached by the ball. But this
procedure becomes cumbersome if the orbit has a large number of turning
points. In such a case, it is easier to differentiate the energy equation with
respect to time and then solve the resulting second-order equation, as was
done above. ^ Let’s now apply this method to the richer problem of interest
in this paper.
ORBITING ON A FRICTIONLESS PARABOLIC SURFACE
Suppose that a puck is sliding frictionlessly about the bottom of a
concave bowl which has cylindrical symmetry around the vertical axis z,
described by the parabolic cross-sectional profile
Z = (5)
Washington Academy of Sciences
9
using cylindrical coordinates, p, z, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The origin of
the coordinate system is at the vertex of the bowl, and a factor of V2 has
been included in Eq. (5) to avoid factors of 2 that otherwise arise.
Fig. 1. Free-body diagram indicating the normal {N) and gravitational
forces {mg) acting on the puck (indicated by the dot) when it is located
at arbitrary position {p,(j)^z) . The paraboloidal surface has slope tan^
in the radial direction.
Energy conservation implies that
j-mv + mgz = constant => v +gkp = constant (6)
7 7 7 7
where V = ^he first constant has been divided by a
factor of !/2 m to get the second constant. Here Vp=dpl dt , = pco
(where o) = d(l)l dt is the puck’s angular velocity about the axis of
symmetry), and v^ = dzldt = kpdpldt. Since neither gravity nor the
normal force exerts a vertical torque on the puck about the origin, the z-
component of the angular momentum is constant and therefore equals its
initial value,
2 2
=mp co= mpfjCOQ
0) =
6%
(7)
Inserting this expression into the speed squared in Eq. (6) and taking the
time derivative to eliminate the constant yields
£
dt
[\ + k^p^)vl + p^o^p ^ + gkp^
= 0.
(8)
Summer 2007
10
The derivative can be performed and a factor of 2v^ divided out of every
term, in analogy to how Eq. (4) was obtained from Eq. (3), to get
-kp(g + kvl)
(9)
where p / dt^ . This equation can also be obtained (but with
considerably more effort) by finding the two orthogonal surface tangential
components (to avoid the unknown normal force) of Newton’s second law
in cylindrical coordinates.
One final step is helpful before proceeding to a computer solution.
Equation (9) can be rewritten in terms of the dimensionless variables
R = kp and T = (o^t as
^2^ ^RyR^[c + {dRldTf^
dT^ +
(10)
where C = gk ! co^ is a dimensionless constant. This is a second-order
differential equation to be solved with the initial conditions
R{Q) = R^ = kp^ and K(0) = Tq “ ^ ^^ere V = dR! dT . Suppose
the initial angular velocity is chosen so that the puck travels in a stable
counter-clockwise circular orbit around the vertex of the bowl. The puck
is then given a quick push toward the rim of the dish. The push provides a
radial impulse to the puck. (Note that a radial impulse does not change the
value of Lz) Prior to the push, R must have the constant value Rq so that
dR ! dT and d^R! dT^ are both zero, and Eq. (10) therefore implies
that C = 1 . In turn this result requires that OJ^ = (gk) regardless of the
puck’s position on the surface. This is a special property of a parabolic
dish and is the reason that the surface of a rotating liquid settles into a
paraboloidal shape, a property that can be exploited to make the primary
collecting mirror of a reflecting telescope.^
Once Eq. (10) is solved for R{T), it can be substituted into Eq. (7)
written in the dimensionless form dcf)! dT = {R^l R) . That result can then
be integrated to obtain ^T) with the initial condition 0(0) = 0 (by
Washington Academy of Sciences
11
choosing the x-axis to point to the puck’s position at the instant of
application of the radial impulse). The results can then be plotted
parametrically to give an overhead view of the xy-coordinates of the puck
in the dimensionless form
X = 7?cos0 and Y = Rs^m(p. (11)
Here is the complete code we wrote to solve and plot the motion of the
puck using the commercial software program Maple^^ for the
case = 1 = Fq , as graphed in Fig. 2(a):
R0:=1; V0:=1;
eqR:-diff(R(T),T,T)=(ROM-R(T)M*( 1 +diff(R(T),T)^2))/R(T)^3/( 1 +R{TY2);
eqphi:=diff(phi(T),T)=(R0/R(T))^2;
sol-dsolve({eqR,eqphi,R(0)=R0,phi(0)=0,D(R)(0)=V0},{R(T),phi(T)}, numeric);
r:=T->rhs(sol(T)[2]); p:=T->rhs(sol(T)[4]);
X:=T->r(T)*cos(p(T)); Y:=T->r(T)*sin(p(T));
plot(['X(T)',’Y(T)',T=0..50*Pi],scaling=constrained);
By varying the initial values Rq and Fq in the first line, a rich variety of
orbital patterns result; two further examples are plotted in panels (b) and
(c) of Fig. 2, chosen to illustrate some common patterns. Our school has a
site license for Maple^^ and students are introduced to its use in their
introductory calculus sequence and could be given the above code with
which to experiment. At other schools, Mathematical'^ or implementation
of Euler’s method in a spreadsheet such as Excel™ might be a better
choice. 3 However the comparative simplicity of the code above makes this
a good example with which to introduce students to algorithmic software
packages.
Further insight into the puck’s motion is obtained by making the radial
impulse very weak, so that the circular orbit is only slightly perturbed.^ In
that case, it is easier to see the resulting small effect by jumping into a
frame of reference that rotates with the puck’s initial angular speed of
The xj^-coordinates of the puck in this rotating frame can be computed
using Eq. (11) provided we replace ^ by (j)- co^t ^(p-T . An example is
plotted in Fig. 2(d). The puck starts on the x-axis at (/^O’^) travels^
clockwise with very nearly uniform circular motion of dimensionless
diameter Fq at an angular frequency of Ico^. That is, the puck performs
one clockwise orbit in the rotating frame during the time that the puck
Summer 2007
12
rotates counter-clockwise halfway around the bowl in the lab frame. This
trajectory is a result of the Coriolis force which produces a rightward
deflection of the puck in the rotating frame, ^ analogous to the rotation of
hurricanes in the northern hemisphere of the earth. The radially outward
centrifugal force is almost perfectly canceled by the inward component of
the normal force.
Fig. 2. Overhead views of the trajectory of the puck (a) in the lab
frame for Rq = 1 and = 1 over the interval 0 < T < 50;r ; (b) in the
lab frame for = 1 and Tq = 8 over the interval 0 < T < 1 50;r ; (c) in
the lab frame for Rq = 0.05 and = 0.5 over the interval
0<T < 25 fT ; (d) in the rotating frame for R^ = 0.01 and Vq = 0.0001
over the interval 0 < T < ;r (in a highly magnified view).
Washington Academy of Sciences
13
FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION
At least two interesting lines of inquiry are left for future work, the
first theoretical and the second experimental:
(1) Under what circumstances is the orbital motion closed? Close
inspection of Fig. 2(b) indicates that the orbit appears to repeat after
tracing out 19 lobes. In contrast, the pattern in Fig. 2(a) is starting over
(after 25 time periods of Itt / co^) dX 3. slightly shifted angular position. By
writing V = dRI dT - / R)^{dR / dc/)) and equating it to the positive
square root of V from Eq. (6) as the puck travels from closest to farthest
approach from the bowl’s vertex, one can integrate to find an expression
for A0 along this path. The orbit is closed if ;r/ is a rational number.
(In particular if that number is an integer, then the orbit never crosses
itself) Similarly, Eq. (10) can be recast into an orbital differential
equation for 7?(^) rather than R{T) .
(2) To investigate experimentally the trajectories described in this paper,
one could construct a parabolic “air hockey” table by drilling holes in a
suitable dish and blowing air through them. Alternatively one could roll a
marble on an old parabolic mirror or satellite television dish and modify
the present theory to include frictional forces. (One could even spin the
dish to keep the marble from slowing down.) For comparison, interesting
effects occur when a ball rolls without slipping on the surface of a rotating
flat plate,”^ on the inner surface of a vertical cylinder such as a golf cup,^
on the surface of an elastic membrane,^ or on the inner surface of a
sphere.
A cknowledgments
We thank David Bowman and Mitch Baker for useful discussions
about closure of the orbits.
REFERENCES
1. An alternative approach is to minimize the action or equivalently to write down the
Lagrange equations. See D.E. Neuenschwander, E.F. Taylor, and S. Tuleja, “Action;
Forcing energy to predict motion,” Phys. Teach. 44, 146-152 (Mar. 2006).
2. T. Feder, “Mercury telescope spins up,” Phys. Today 56, 24-25 (Nov. 2003). Also see
the follow-up letter on page 82 of the July 2004 issue.
A
Summer 2007
14
3. For a brief overview of numerically integrating a differential equation by finite-
difference methods using a spreadsheet, see P.A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for
Scientists and Engineers, 6th ed. (Freeman, New York, 2004), Sec. 5-4.
4. K.T. McDonald, “A mechanical model that exhibits a gravitational critical radius,”
Am. J. Phys. 69, 617-618 (May 2001).
5. These statements can be proven by performing a perturbation analysis of Eq. (10).
6. J. Barcelos-Neto and M.B. Dias da Silva, “An example of motion in a rotating frame,”
Eur. J. Phys. 10, 305-308 (Oct. 1989).
7. K. Weltner, “Stable circular orbits of freely moving balls on rotating discs,” Am. J.
Phys. 47, 984-986 (Nov. 1979). Also see R. Ehrlich and J. Tuszynski, “Ball on a
rotating turntable: Comparison of theory and experiment,” Am. J. Phys. 63, 351-359
(Apr. 1995).
8. M. Gualtieri, T. Tokieda, L. Advis-Gaete, B. Carry, E. Reffet, and C. Guthmann,
“Golfer’s dilemma,” Am. J. Phys. 74, 497-501 (June 2006). Also see O. Pujol and J.
Ph. Perez, “On a simple formulation of the golf ball paradox,” Eur. J. Phys. 28, 379-
384 (Mar. 2007).
9. G.D. White and M. Walker, “The shape of ‘the Spandex’ and orbits upon its surface,”
Am. J. Phys. 70, 48-52 (Jan. 2002). Also see the follow-up comment on pages 1056-
1058 of the October 2002 issue.
10. See Demonstration 4.5 “A processing orbit” on page 66 of R. Ehrlich, Why Toast
Lands Jelly-Side Down (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1997).
Washington Academy of Sciences
15
A NEW LOOK AT MENDEL
Julie Simon Lakehomer
Tinley Park High School, Illinois
Into the 19th century ferment of biological inquiry came Gregor
Mendel, an Austrian friar with an intense interest in natural science.
Mendel was a genius ahead of his time, and his contemporaries
completely failed to appreciate his discovery of the principles of
heredity. Mendel demonstrated that differing parental versions of traits,
accommodated in hybrid offspring, separate and assort independently
and randomly into reproductive entities. Mendel was eventually
credited with knowing of genes and how they confer traits, when in fact
he did not know these things. As a result of this exaggeration, some
brilliant aspects of Mendel’s actual accomplishments were slighted.
This paper provides a fresh look at Mendel's life and accomplishments.
INTRODUCTION
Early people watched traits pass from generation to generation.
Hunter-gatherers buried seeds from desirable food plants, expecting to
find similar plants the following year. Hunters and herders mated desirable
work animals and livestock, expecting similarly desirable young. These
early breeders never dreamed of genes — they didn't need to in order to be
successful (Diamond 1997 and McLoughlin 1983). Yet somehow
characteristics from parents appeared in offspring.
Maybe the male parent transmitted a miniature organism into the
female, where it then developed. Or maybe the miniature was already in
the female and the male transmitted a vital force to stimulate growth. Yet
neither possibility explained how offspring resembled both parents. And
neither agreed with observations that embryos developed gradually from
amorphous material into increasingly recognizable beings. Maybe fluids
from both parents combined in a vivifying chemical reaction that
engendered an embryo. Or molecules from both might react to form an
embryo the way acids and bases reacted to form salts. Or infinitesimal bits
from all parts of both parents might attract each other and grow into all the
parts of a new organism (Farley 1982).
A big problem was that heredity occurs microscopically, within
and between cells. With the invention of microscopes in the seventeenth
century, people for the first time could actually observe a little about
Summer 2007
16
reproduction (Bradburv^ 1967). But imagine approaching the subject for
the first time. No one even knew what to study.
Aside from invisibility, there was the problem of experimentation.
In the eighteenth centur\% fanciers, namralists, and agriculturalists mated
plants and animals to produce specific characteristics in offspring; to
differentiate between species and varieties; to explain self-fertilization and
self-sterility in plants; or, in Darwin's case, to determine the sources of
variation upon which natural selection operated. Results were mixed.
Often only a few crosses w ere performed, willy-nilly between generations,
with only a few’ outcomes. Data w ere subjective and expressed in terms of
numerous characteristics, obscuring any clear pattern. Many hybridists
assumed that traits came not only from parents, but from exterior
circumstances (soil, feed, weather). And. except for Darwin, hybridists
don’t seem to have grasped that all the problems had to do with heredity
(Roberts 1929; Sturtevant 1965).
By the nineteenth century, the microscopists and hybridists had
become separate groups, each with their owm learned societies. Laboratory
scientists devoted themselves to chemical and microscopic investigations
(Rudy 1984 and Bradbury^ 1967). Naturalists devoted themselves to
cataloging native species, conser\’ation. and hybridization. Neither group
had much to do w ith the other (Allen 1976 and Farley 1982).
Into this climate of inquiry came Gregor Mendel, an Austrian friar
with an intense interest in natural science. Mendel w’as a genius ahead of
his time, and his contemporaries completely failed to appreciate his
discovery of the principles of heredity. Mendel demonstrated that w^hen
parents have different versions of traits, such as color, those differences
are accommodated in hybrid offspring. Often only one of the parental
versions is evident, or sometimes a new version of the trait appears.
Nevertheless, the parental differences retain their independence within the
hybrid, and separate again w^hen the hybrid forms reproductive entities.
Furthermore, if parents differ with regard to more than one trait, the
varying versions of all those traits will assort in all possible combinations
into the reproductive entities of the hybrids. Ultimately, both parents
influence offspring equally.
In 1900, long after Mendel had died, and half a century after his
investigations, biologists rediscovered him and dubbed him father of
modem genetics. However, their appreciation was colored by what had
been learned in the inter\^ening decades. Mendel w^as eventually credited
w ith knowing of genes and how’ they confer traits, w^hen in fact he did not
Washington Academy of Sciences
17
know these things.^ As a result of this exaggeration, some brilliant aspects
of Mendel’s actual accomplishments were slighted.
EARLY LIFE
Mendel was bom in 1822 into a family of enterprising peasants,
some having increased their farm acreage and buildings, and some having
risen in education and public responsibility. Mendel learned about plant
culture and beekeeping from his father and also at the local school where,
remarkably, the lady of the manor required the teaching of natural science
along with the basics.^ Mendel was a noteworthy student, so his family
sacrificed to send him to high school (litis, 1932). He so loved learning, he
wrote two poems celebrating Johannes Gutenberg for inventing the
printing press, because it spread enlightenment among humankind.^
After high school Mendel continued at the Olmiitz Philosophical
Institute, but could barely sustain himself by tutoring and scraping by
without enough to eat. A few times, stress overcame him, and he returned
home for months to recover from apparent emotional breakdowns. Rather
than give up his education, Mendel sought help from a professor, who
offered to recommend Mendel for the community of friars at the Abbey of
St. Thomas at Briinn. So, in order to continue studying, Mendel became
an Augustinian friar (Mawer 2006).
The Abbey sent him to the University of Vienna, where he studied
mathematics, physics, chemistry, zoology, entomology, botany, and
paleontology from 1851 until 1853. His physics and chemistry professors
were noteworthy experimenters whose methods may have influenced
Mendel’s subsequent research (Sturtevant 1965). Returning to Briinn,
Mendel taught physics at the Modem School until 1868 when he became
prelate. Meanwhile, he had use of the monastery gardens and time to
experiment. He purchased various species of bees from all over Europe
and attempted, unsuccessfully, to cross them. He helped found the
Austrian Meteorological Society and kept daily records of precipitation,
temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, soil water, and sunspots,
becoming the Briinn data collector for the Vienna Meteorological Institute.
He sought a connection between soil water levels and local cholera
epidemics, and between sunspot activity and weather. In 1870 he wrote a
detailed account of a rare tornado that passed over the monastery.
Throughout his life, Mendel read widely, becoming familiar with the
important scientific research of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. He
Summer 2007
18
corresponded with professors in the various fields in which he worked,
addressing these men in the most complimentary and deferential way,
because of custom, but perhaps also because of his humble background or
because he was a Catholic cleric in a Protestant world (Boyer 2007).
MAJOR EXPERIMENTAL WORK
By the 1850s Mendel had tried to repeat the work of many plant
hybridizers. He was frustrated because these investigators did not always
report which species they crossed, or which generations, nor did they
record detailed results.
So Mendel decided to investigate hybridization in flowering plants
himself, to try to discover a “generally applicable law of the formation and
development of hybrids,” which he believed would be of unquestionable
importance to “the evolutionary history of organic forms” (Stem 1966 [1-
2]).
Here, some botany will be helpful: The reproductive organ of a
flowering plant is the flower, which contains a central female part with
surrounding male parts. Flowering plants produce offspring in the form of
seeds at the bottom of the female part of the flower, the pistil. Mendel
called the pistil the “seed plant.” Seed formation occurs after pollen from a
flower of the same (or similar) species arrives on the top of the pistil. The
pollen comes from the male parts of the flower, the anthers. Mendel called
the anthers the “pollen plant.” This fertilization process had been known
for centuries, and microscopists had even seen pollen grains growing tubes
down into the seed-forming parts of pistils. Yet no one knew how
reproduction in plants or animals actually worked."^
Mendel chose garden peas for his hybridization experiments for
two reasons. One: the flowers are self-fertilizing. Normally, a plant’s
flowers open, and insects, birds, bats, or wind move the ripe pollen from
the anthers of one flower to the pistil of another; but in pea plants, the
pollen ripens and becomes stuck on top of the pistil of the same flower
before the petals open. This closed-petal self-fertilization struck Mendel as
useful for experimentation. Since the flowers remained closed during the
fertilization period, no chance pollination by insects or wind could
interfere. However, Mendel himself could cut into the closed flowers
before their pollen ripened and remove the anthers to prevent self-
fertilization. Then he could use a little bmsh to apply ripe pollen from
Washington Academy of Sciences
19
another flower of his own choosing onto the pistil. This way he could
control exactly which plants mated with which.
Two: these pea plants displayed a number of traits with discreet
versions. Some of the plants had violet-red flowers, while others had
white. ^ Some produced round seeds, while others produced wrinkled ones.
And so it went: yellow versus green seeds, inflated versus constricted
pods, green versus yellow pods, flowers on the sides of the plants (axial)
versus flowers at the tops (terminal), tall stems versus short ones. These
contrasting versions were so clear, no subjective “matter of opinion” was
necessary to identify them. Furthermore, each plant was constant with
respect to its traits, meaning that when plants were allowed to self-
fertilize, the offspring of violet-red flowered plants always had violet-red
flowers, and the offspring of white-flowered plants always had white. The
same was true of all seven traits Mendel investigated.
Here is what Mendel did that decades later looked so prescient.
Over eight years, he used his pea plants in a rigorous type of scientific
experiment uncommon in biology until the end of the nineteenth century.^
He mated large numbers of pea plants with contrasting versions of a single
trait to produce hybrid plants. For instance, he crossed violet-red flowered
plants with white-flowered plants by applying pollen from the anthers of
violet-red blossoms to the pistils of white ones, and by applying pollen
from the anthers of white blossoms to the pistils of violet-red ones. Then
Mendel waited for seeds to develop and planted them to see what the
hybrids would look like.
The hybrids that grew from those seeds all had violet-red blooms
— the white flower color seemed to have been lost. Next, Mendel allowed
the flowers of the hybrids to self-fertilize. In other words, he allowed this
generation to mate among themselves. The seeds they produced
constituted the second generation of offspring from the original parent
crosses. When these second generation seeds grew into plants, three-
fourths had violet-red flowers, but one-fourth had white (a ratio of 3:1).
The white color must have been there all along, for now it had reappeared!
Each trait brought the same results. The hybrids showed only one
of the two parent possibilities for seed texture, seed color, pod shape, pod
color, flower position, or height. But the second offspring generation
showed both, and always in a ratio of about 3:1.^ Mendel called trait
versions like white color, that got hidden in the hybrid generations of his
crosses, “recessive,” and the versions that always showed, like violet-red
flower color, “dominant.” The dominant versions turned out to be violet-
Summer 2007
20
red flowers, round seeds, yellow seeds, inflated pods, green pod color,
axial flowers, and tall stems.
Next, Mendel allowed the second offspring generations, with the
3:1 ratios, to self-fertilize. All the recessive plants were constant: every
succeeding, self-fertilized generation from these was recessive. But of the
dominant plants, only a third were constant, while two-thirds of them,
when allowed to self-fertilize, produced another 3:1 generation; the two-
thirds had been hybrids again. This situation continued with every 3:1
group: the recessives were all constant, while a third of the dominant
plants were constant and two-thirds were hybrids.
Mendel generalized these results with symbols. He symbolized a
constant-breeding dominant plant with A, a constant-breeding recessive
plant with a, and a hybrid, since it could produce dominant, recessive, or
hybrid offspring, was Aa. Thus each 3:1 generation could be symbolized
A + 2Aa + a.^
Now Mendel wondered what might happen if he mixed two traits,
say by mating plants bearing round-textured, yellow-colored seeds with
plants bearing wrinkled-textured, green-colored seeds. He tried this, and
again the hybrids were all dominant, bearing round, yellow seeds.
However, the second offspring generation bore four different seed
appearances: round/yellow, round/green, wrinkled/yellow, and
wrinkled/green. Mendel saw that the four appearances were a combination
of the 3 : 1 ratio of round to wrinkled (A + 2 Aa + a) along with the 3 : 1 ratio
of yellow to green (B + 2Bb + b).^ Such a combination was probable'®
only if the round or wrinkled textures were free to appear in any
assortment with the yellow or green colors.
Then he mixed three traits: seed shape (round or wrinkled), seed
color (yellow or green), and flower color (violet-red or white). Again the
hybrid generation was entirely dominant, with round, yellow seeds
growing into violet-red flowered plants. But the second offspring
generation showed all eight possible combinations of the trait versions:
round/yellow/violet-red, wrinkled/yellow/violet-red, round/yellow/white,
wrinkled/yellow/white, round/green/violet-red, wrinkled/green/violet-red,
round/green/white, and wrinkled/green/white. These eight appearances
were a combination of a 3:1 ratio of round to wrinkled (A + 2Aa + a), a
3:1 ratio of yellow to green (B + 2Bb + b), and a 3:1 ratio of violet-red to
white (C + 2Cc + c)." Again, such a combination of ratios was probable
only if the various trait versions were free to appear randomly in any
assortments. No matter which sets of traits Mendel crossed, the results
Washington Academy of Sciences
21
were the same. He had discovered two rules. One: if hybrids are formed
by crossing two versions of any number of traits, the offspring of the
hybrids will show as many combinations of 3:1 ratios as there were traits
to begin with. Two: a version of any trait can associate freely with a
version of any other trait. So if n = the number of different traits (e.g.
seed color, seed shape, flower color, height, etc.) then 2" = the number of
possible combinations of versions. Thus two traits give 2^ = 4
combinations; three traits give 2^ = 8 combinations; etc.
Here are the modem aspects of Mendel’s experiments:
He used mathematics. He experimented with many plants — tens,
hundreds, and eventually thousands — for with many matings, chance was
less likely to skew results. He kept exact counts of all plants, never trying
to influence the results by leaving some out. (I will say more about this
below.) He analyzed data mathematically, coming up with the important
3:1 ratio of dominant to recessive versions in the second offspring
generation and using that ratio to analyze further experiments. He viewed
the data he collected in terms of “laws of probability” and tolerable
amounts of “fluctuation” (Stem, 1966), mathematical notions unfamiliar in
biology until the early 20th century (Daintith 1999 and Salsburg 2001).
His crosses were objective. The differences between versions were
clear (i.e. violet-red vs. white, yellow vs. green, etc.), so that any
researcher would have agreed with Mendel’s results. He kept the
generations separate, allowing no intergenerational mating. He
experimented on one trait at a time, then on one specific pair of traits, then
on one specific trio, rather than the entire appearance of the plants at once
(Bateson 1913).
He controlled variables. He eliminated to a high degree any chance
pollinations. He sowed seeds into both pots and the garden in case one or
the other might change outcomes. He placed some plants in a greenhouse
to compare with those outdoors, in case the less controllable outdoor
conditions had some effect. Finally, he performed reciprocal crosses, lest
it make a difference whether pollen plant or seed plant had a particular
trait version. Results were the same under all conditions (Stem 1966).
He used symbols: A, B, C, etc. for constant-breeding dominants, a,
b, c. for constant-breeding recessives, and Aa, Bb, Cc, etc. for hybrids.
Symbols afforded an overall view. So instead of the confusion of many
appearances reported by his predecessors, when Mendel crossed plants
Summer 2007
22
with multiple traits, he could generalize the ratio from his original single-
trait experiments to a comprehensive rule for heredity.
As a result of the modernity of his experiments, Mendel could
come up with new ideas about how heredity worked beneath the surface.
His first idea was: pollen cells and seed cells were constant, not hybrid.
For instance, pollen cells or seed cells could be only violet-red or only
white. When pollen and seed cell were alike, and joined in fertilization,
they formed new seed which sprouted a new plant of the same constant-
breeding type (either A or a), whereas when pollen and seed cell were
different, the resulting seed and plant would be hybrid, containing both
trait versions, even though only one showed (Aa). When such hybrid
plants became mature, the contrasting trait versions separated, and the
hybrid plants produced pollen cells and seed cells that were solely one
version or the other (either A or a), in equal numbers.
This idea, that pollen cells and seed cells were constant, explained
the original 3:1 ratio in the second offspring generation. The hybrids were
all a combined type: Aa, but later, their reproductive cells, the pollen and
seed cells, were either A or a in equal numbers. At reproduction, pollen
cells of type A could fertilize seed cells of type A to produce pure
dominant A plants. Or pollen cells of type A could fertilize seed cells of
type a to produce hybrid Aa plants that appeared dominant. Or pollen cells
of type a could fertilize seed cells of type A to produce hybrid Aa plants
that appeared dominant. Or pollen cells of type a could fertilize seed cells
of type a to produce pure recessive a plants. Mendel illustrated the
possible fertilizations and the resulting ratio:
A A a a
= A + 2Aa + a
A a A a
With equal numbers of both kinds of pollen cells and both kinds of
seed cells, any mating was likely. So the probability was high that many
matings would produce a ratio of dominant to recessive plants of 3: 1 .
This new idea of the constant nature of pollen cells and seed cells
also explained the results of crosses of more than one trait. In such
crosses, the various constant versions of traits combined freely (e.g. seed
color was independent of seed shape, both were independent of flower
color, etc.). So Mendel’s second idea was that when pollen cells or seed
cells were produced within a hybrid plant, the various versions of traits
Washington Academy of Sciences
23
combined randomly and equally with one another. For instance, in the
case of a cross between a plant having round yellow seeds and a plant
having wrinkled green seeds, the hybrid first offspring generation (AaBb)
must form equal numbers of reproductive cells with all possible
combinations of versions of the two traits of seed shape and seed color:
AB, Ab, aB, and ab.
To confirm these hypotheses, Mendel returned to his hybrid plants
resulting from round, yellow seeded plants crossed with wrinkled, green
seeded plants. These hybrids must be type AaBb. Mendel crossed the
hybrids with pure dominants or pure recessives. Let’s look at the cross
between hybrids and pure recessives.'^ Mendel now knew that the
recessive plants must have pollen and seed cells of type ab. So when he
crossed the hybrid plants with pure recessive plants, every type of pollen
or seed cell from the hybrids would be combined in equal numbers with
entirely recessive pollen cells or seed cells:
Mendel predicted equal numbers of offspring with each of the four
possible combinations: round/yellow (AaBb), round/green (Aab),
wrinkled/yellow (aBb), and wrinkled/green (ab). Sure enough, the
resulting ratio was 1:1:1:1 for the four appearances. The hypothesis that
the constant versions of traits from a hybrid plant wound up randomly and
equally combined in the hybrid’s reproductive cells was demonstrated.
Performing the same experiment with various other trait combinations
brought the same results.'^
Mendel had proved to his satisfaction two principles. Pollen cells
and seed cells were constant, not hybrid. And, given the range of traits a
plant contained, the trait versions joined freely, randomly, and in equal
numbers in the pollen and seed cells.
He now saw that these two rules pointed to two additional ideas
about heredity. One: pollen and seed plants contributed equally to hybrid
offspring; neither the paternal nor the maternal contribution could be
minimized.'^ Two: within a hybrid plant, the contrasting trait versions
from pollen and seed parents combined in some sort of “compromise”
which allowed only the dominant to show. This compromise was
Summer 2007
24
temporary, enduring only for the lifetime of the hybrid plant, so that when
the hybrid produced pollen and seed cells, the trait versions separated
again.
GENERAL APPLICATION OF MENDELIAN PRINCIPLES
Now that Mendel was satisfied that all the experimental traits
followed the same rules of probability, he generalized the rules to cover
‘'traits which show less distinctly in the plants, and could therefore not be
included in the individual experiments” (Stem, 1966 [23]). Further, he
could use the mles to explain a variety of phenomena he and others had
encountered.
For instance, after finishing with pea plants, Mendel tried similar
experiments with beans, com, and four o’ clocks. The four o’clock hybrids,
instead of showing a dominant version of flower color, showed an
intermediate version. Crosses between red and white four o’ clocks
produced deep pink hybrids, while crosses between red and yellow ones
produced orange (Showalter 1933). When the deep pink hybrids self-
fertilized, the progeny were red, deep pink, and white in a ratio of 1:2:1.
Mendel saw this was just a new manifestation of the 3:1 ratio (A + 2Aa +
a). Recall that the recessives from this ratio were constant-breeding, and
one-third of the dominants were also constant-breeding, while two-thirds
were hybrids. This was the case here. The red and white plants were
constant (A and a), while the deep pink plants were hybrids (2Aa). So the
inheritance of such intermediate trait versions followed Mendel’s mles.^^
Another problem arose from crossing white-flowered bean plants
with red-flowered ones. The hybrids had red flowers, but the offspring of
the hybrids had red flowers, white flowers, and flowers of many different
reddish shades, seeming to break the 3:1 pattern. Mendel thought the
original red color might have resulted from more than one independent
color, and these independent colors might be inherited as separate traits.
Symbols for dominants could be Ai, A2, A3, etc. (like A, B, C), for
recessives a (or ai, a2, a3, like a, b, c). So if there were, say, two
independent colors, then n = 2, yielding 2^ = 4 different combinations;
three independent colors yields 2^ = 8 different combinations; four yields
2^ = 16 different combinations, etc. Depending on whether the
independent colors mixed in dominant and recessive ways, or whether
hybrids were intermediate, there could be many red shades among the
offspring of hybrids.
Washington Academy of Sciences
25
A related matter was the profusion of colors among all cultivated
flowers. Mendel’s contemporaries, including Darwin, explained this by
saying that domestication disrupted a species’ stability. Mendel saw no
reason why such disruption should continue through decades of
domestication: “No one would seriously want to maintain that plant
development in the wild and in garden beds was governed by different
laws” (Stem 1966 [37]). Instead Mendel opined that in gardens, among
many species of flowering plants growing together, accidental
hybridization must be frequent. Offspring of such hybrids might develop
with many versions of a number of independent color traits as with beans.
In support of this, Mendel noted that among the many colors of
ornamental flowers, some were constant-breeding, as expected among
offspring of hybrids.
Mendel then tackled two problems reported by other hybridists.
First, some hybrids resembled the male parent more, some the female.
Second, there often was no resemblance, but a multitude of new
appearances. Mendel solved both problems with his mathematical mles.
The problems came from working with all of a plant’s traits at once.
Suppose seven traits were examined simultaneously, each with a dominant
and recessive version, then 2^ = 128 different appearances that might
result among offspring of hybrids. These offspring being 3:1 dominant to
recessive, if one parent had most of the dominant trait versions, most of
the offspring would resemble that parent. Or if a researcher examined one
hundred offspring, all could show different appearances.
Finally, hybridists mentioned two related problems. One was a
phenomenon they called “reversion,” the return of the offspring of hybrid
plants to one or both parental appearances. The other had to do with
efforts to cause the “transformation” of one species into a second by
hybridizing the two and crossing offspring that most resembled the second
species with members of that species. The number of generations
necessary for this “transformation” varied for different species. Mendel
pointed out that according to his mathematical rules, both problems were
solved by understanding offspring from hybrids. In the case of one trait
with two versions, A or a, the offspring of the hybrids are constant-
breeding dominants, hybrids, and constant-breeding recessives in a lowest
terms ratio of 1:2:1 (A + 2Aa + a). Offspring of the new hybrid plants
designated 2Aa will produce another A + 2Aa + a generation; meanwhile
the constant-breeding A and a will produce more constant A plants and
more constant a plants. To maintain lowest terms ratios, Mendel assumed
a minimum of four offspring from each, and predicted that the total
Summer 2007
26
offspring would be as follows down to any generation symbolized as the
zth generation.
Number of constant and hybrid types
z 2" - 1 : 2 : 2" - 1
In each generation, constant types become more numerous compared to
hybrids. So there is no “reversion,” but simply an increase in constant
types. Regarding “transformation,” the number of generations of selective
crossing to re-acquire a constant-breeding type matching an original
parent depends on the number of traits. Mendel saw that, “It becomes
obvious that the smaller the number of experimental plants and the larger
the number of differing traits in the two parental species the longer an
experiment of this kind will last...” (Stem 1966 [16])
Notice how easily Mendel could find explanations for these
problems. This was because he was right about how heredity worked! The
explanations flowed from the principles he had discovered. As he said,
“...unity in the plan of development of organic life is beyond doubt”
(Stem 1966 [43])
MENDEL’S TRUE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Mendel has been called father of modem genetics. This was
untme, and, in fact, impossible. Biologists had to peer through
microscopes at thousands of cells for several more decades, and had to
perform hundreds of controlled crosses, just to begin figuring out the
physical basis of heredity. Furthermore, not knowing the physical basis of
heredity, Mendel surmised that hybrid plants were somehow different
from constant-breeding plants, whereas research eventually showed that
inheritance works the same way in both.
Unfortunately, over-crediting a great historical scientist can rob
him of the distinction he deserves (Gould 1987). At the time of Mendel’s
experiments with peas, little was understood about cells. When Mendel
spoke of pollen cells or seed cells, we really don’t know what he had in
mind. Yet without knowledge of the true nature of cells, or of how their
Washington Academy of Sciences
27
internal parts interact in heredity', reproduction, and grow'th, Mendel
deduced his four principles: both parents contribute equally to offspring,
differing parental trait versions cooperate in hybrid offspring, combined
trait versions in hybrids separate to form constant reproductive cells, and
the separated trait versions enter reproductive cells in all possible
combinations.
All Mendel’s principles turned out to be true! And all turned out to
be central to heredity! So we now say “Mendelian heredity,” meaning the
basics of heredity. Mendel didn’t need to come up with genes to be
brilliant. He used algebra, probability, and clear thinking to figure out the
results of gamete formation and fertilization without knowing the actual
cell structures and molecules involved. He accomplished what he had set
out to do: to obseiA-e the traits of parents, of their hybrid offspring, and of
the offspring of those hybrids, ‘‘to deduce the law according to which
(traits) appear in successive generations” (Stem, 1966 [5]).
DISAPPOINTMENT AND SUCCESS
Perhaps the remarkable modernity of Mendel’s work was
responsible for the absence of contemporary notice of his research.
Mendel was a founding member of the Briinn Society for the Study of
Natural Science. In 1865, at the Society’s Febmary and March meetings,
he delivered a lecture describing his pea experiments. The lecture was
published in Volume IV of the Society’s Proceedings in 1866 (Mendel
1866). Yet there were no questions or discussion after his lecture, no
notice after the publication, though the Society’s Proceedings were
circulated to similar societies all over Europe, and to universities in
Vienna, Berlin, London, St. Petersburg, Rome, Uppsala, etc.
Mendel then began a correspondence with Carl von Naegeli, a
Munich professor and highly respected hybridizer of the time. Mendel sent
Naegeli a copy of his paper and told Naegeli of the additional experiments
with beans, com, and four o’clocks showing the same results as peas. We
don’t know why Mendel chose Naegeli, but Naegeli was known for
mathematical work, so perhaps Mendel felt some kinship, particularly
since other colleagues showed so little interest in his lecture. Also, Mendel
wanted to experiment with hawkweed, and Naegeli had worked on this
plant genus. In any case, both Naegeli and hawkweed proved to be
unfortunate choices. Naegeli ’s response was self-important and dismissive
even as he asked Mendel for pea seeds and sent Mendel various
Summer 2007
28
hawkweed species to work on. Maybe Naegeli didn’t pay close attention
to Mendel’s article. Or maybe he was so unable to change his beliefs, he
doubted Mendel’s discoveries (Naegeli’s notes indicate he didn’t believe
that constant-breeding offspring could result from hybrids) (Roberts,
1965). Or maybe (my favorite hypothesis), recognizing the genius of
Mendel’s work, Naegeli was too jealous to accept it.^^ Aside from
Naegeli’s disdain, Mendel’s work with hawkweed was doomed. Neither
Mendel nor Naegeli realized that most hawkweed species reproduce
differently from other plants and from each other. It was impossible to
obtain corroboration of the pea results from hawkweeds.
So that was that. Some of the most important research ever done
on heredity seemed to die aborning.
Several writers have tried to figure out why Mendel’s
contemporaries paid so little attention to his work. Some attribute this to
the sensation Darwin’s The Origin of Species caused at the same historical
moment. Everyone was talking about natural selection and evolution, so
who cared about another hybridization project, even if it was unique
(Bateson 1913 and litis 1932). In fact, except for Darwin himself, not even
hybridizers realized their work hinged on heredity (Roberts 1965). Others
attribute the inattention to the anachronistic nature of Mendel’s work. Few
biologists of the mid- 1800’s dreamed of controlled, mathematical
experiments like Mendel’s. No one appreciated his tremendous
improvement in biological experimentation. No one could follow his
algebraic reasoning. No one fathomed that he had discovered the very
foundations of heredity (Sturtevant 1965).
Long after Mendel’s work was rediscovered and celebrated, it
received another insult. In 1936 Ronald Aylmer Fisher, one of the fathers
of modem statistics, found bias in Mendel’s data (Fisher, 1936). Since
then the statistical argument over Mendel has ebbed and flowed right up to
the present (Fairbanks, 2001; Monaghan, 1985; Sturtevant, 1965).
Everyone in this controversy, including Fisher, agrees that Mendel was
innocent. No one reading Mendel’s paper can doubt his sincerity.
Suggestions about the “bias” have been: (1) workers counting plants knew
the ratios Mendel expected and leaned toward them, (2) accuracy is
impossible with such mind-numbing counts, (3) no bias occurred, and (4)
Mendel selected the “best” data for his lecture, leaving behind the rest,
now lost.
Personally, I favor the last. Consider the contemporary reception.
Mendel’s 1865 lecture was probably not his first exposure to
Washington Academy of Sciences
29
uncomprehending reactions. He was collegial and surely discussed his
experiments with compatriots. What if their eyes glazed over? What if
they nodded politely, but Mendel could see their boredom and inability to
grasp his message? He might have simplified his lecture in an effort to
make clear his heartfelt, eight-year labor of love. He may well have
presented only his most illustrative data.
After Mendel became head of the Abbey, he gradually dropped his
experiments, though not the meteorological tasks. In the last decade of his
life his health was poor and he embroiled himself in a seemingly hopeless
tax dispute with the state. His final years were gloomy and embittered.
After his death, the tax dispute went his way. And of course, much later,
the work closest to his heart turned out to be a huge triumph. One can only
hope he’s out there somewhere enjoying the fuss we make about him.
Then his poem about Gutenberg could easily be about Mendel himself:
The supreme ecstasy of earthly joy.
The highest goal of earthly ecstasy.
That of seeing, when I arise from the tomb.
My art thriving peacefully
Among those who are to come after me.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen, David Elliston. (1976) 1994. The naturalist in Britain. 2nd ed. Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Bateson, William. 1913. Mendel's principles of heredity. New York: Cambridge
University Press, and Putnam.
Boyer, John. 2007. Dean of the College, and Martin A. Ryerson Distinguished Service
Professor, Department of History and the College, The University of Chicago.
(Telephone conversation with the author, March 29.)
Bradbury, Savile. 1967. The evolution of the microscope. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Daintith, John, and Gjertsen, Derek, eds. 1999. A dictionary of scientists. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel. New York: W. W. Norton.
Fairbanks, Daniel J. and Bryce Rytting. 2001. Mendelian controversies: a botanical and
historical review. Invited special paper. Am. Jrn. Bot. 88(5): 737-752.
Farley, John. 1982. Gametes & spores. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1936. Has Mendel’s work been rediscovered? Ann. ofSci. 1(2): 1 15-
136.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1987. Time ’s arrow, time 's cycle: myth and metaphor in the
discovery of geological time. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Summer 2007
30
litis. Hugo. (1924) 1932. Life of Mendel. English translation. New York: Hafner.
(Except where otherwise noted. litis is the source of biographical material about
Mendel.)
McLoughlin. John C. 1983. The canine clan, a new look at man's best friend. New
York: Viking.
Mawer. Simon. 2006. Gregor Mendel: planting the seeds of genetics. New York:
Abrams (in association with The Field Museum. Chicago).
Mendel. Gregor. 1866. Versnche iiber Pflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen des
naturforschenden Vereines in Brunn 4(1865):3-47.
Monaghan. Floyd, and Alain Corcos. 1985. Chi-square and Mendel’s experiments:
wJiere’s the bias? Jm. Hered. 76:307-309.
Roberts, H. F. (1929) 1965. Plant hybridization before Mendel. Facsimile edition. New
York: Haftier Publishing Company.
Rudy, Willis. 1984. The universities of Europe, 1100-1914. Rutherford. (NJ): Fairleigh
Dickinson University Press.
Salburg, David. 2001. The lady' tasting tea. New York: A W. H. Freeman Owl Book.
Henrv' Holt and Company.
Showalter, Hiram M. 1934. Self flower-color inheritance and mutation in mirabilis
jalapal. Genetics 19: 568-580.
Stem. Curt and Eva R. Sherwood, ed. 1966. The origin of genetics: a Mendel source
book. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co. (Unless otherwise noted, this is the
source of the English translation of Mendel’s article describing his pea experiments.)
Sturtevant. Alfred H. 1965. A history' of genetics. New York: Harper and Row.
NOTES
1. An example is Bateson (1913). In translating Mendel’s writing, Bateson used terms
many decades more recent, contemporaiy' to Bateson but not to Mendel. Examples
are “statistical” instead of “numerical” for numerisch, and “egg cell” instead of “seed
cell” or “germ cell” for Keimzelle. (According to the Oxford English Dictionary,
“statistical” was not used in English to pertain to science until Bateson’s time.) In the
20^^ centuiy^ Mendel’s original word Factor, translated “factor,” meaning a general
cause, came to mean a specific chromosomal cause of a trait and eventually became
“gene.” People unfamiliar with this word history naturally thought Mendel knew all
about genes.
2. See Allen. 1976, for numerous examples of women fostering nature study.
3. litis, 1932 [36-37]: Here is the second poem:
You letters, you types, fruit of my research.
Y ou are the rock foundation
On which I shall establish and upbuild
My temple for all time.
As the master willed, you shall dispel
The gloomy power of superstition
WTiich now oppresses the world.
The works of the greatest men.
Which now, of use only to the few,
Crumble away into nothingness.
You will keep in the light and will preserv e.
Washington Academy of Sciences
31
For in many a head still wrapped
In slumber, your strength will foster
The great, the clear, powers of the mind.
To create a new, a better life.
May the might of destiny grant me
The supreme ecstasy of earthly joy.
The highest goal of earthly ecstasy.
That of seeing, when I arise from the tomb.
My art thriving peacefully
Among those who are to come after me. (litis, 1932)
4. In flowering plants, each pollen grain contains two nuclei, roughly equivalent to
animal sperm. These two nuclei descend the pollen tube and enter an ovule
containing egg cells. One sperm nucleus fertilizes one egg cell to form a zygote
which develops into an embryo plant. The second sperm nucleus joins two other egg
cells in a triple fertilization which develops into the endosperm, a packet of stored
food beneath the seed coat, enclosing the embryo and furnishing nourishment for the
infant plant at germination until it can photosynthesize for itself
5. Mendel noted principally the seed coat colors. One was dark or spotted and associated
with reddish plant parts, including flowers. The contrasting seed coat was clear and
associated with white flowers. For simplicity, or to appeal to students, biology texts
refer to the flower colors when discussing Mendel.
6. Pasteur’s mid-nineteenth century experiments were modem, and were noticed and
copied. Exactly opposite to Mendel, Pasteur had a flashy personality and a gift for
becoming essential to economic interests (vintners, textile producers, etc.)
7. None of Mendel’s ratios were exactly 3:1. Instead, in a group of 929 plants, 705 were
violet-red and 224 white, giving a lowest terms ratio of about 3.15:1. Other groups’
lowest terms ratios were 2.96:1, 3.01:1, 2.95:1, 2.82:1, 3.14:1, 2.84:1, etc. Expecting
nature’s chance deviations, Mendel rounded to the whole number ratio all
approximated: 3:1
8. As with the 3: 1 ratios, A + 2Aa + a, is a lowest terms, whole number ratio.
9. The “combination” is a multiplication: (A + 2Aa a)(B - 2Bb -- b) = AB - 2AaB -
aB * 2ABb - 4AaBb - 2aBb - Ab ^ 2Aab ~ ab. The answer to the
multiplication contains nine different constant and hybrid types. Mendel saw that if n
= the number of traits in the cross (here n = 2, seed color and seed shape), the total
number of constant and hybrid types in the generation of offspring resulting from
self-fertilization of the hybrids is 3". Furthermore, in the lowest terms ratio of
individual plants, the total number of individual plants is sixteen, or 4". And the total
number of different appearances is four, or 2".
10. Statistics deals with mles of chance, and the veracity of conclusions from modem
scientific experiments is judged by these mles of probability. In lay terms, “chance”
and “probability” mean something unpredictable. But in science, with large samples,
“chance” or “probability” can verify results. For instance, if your friend flipped a
coin three times and you chose tails, and the flip came up heads all three times,
you’d figure those are the breaks. But in a similar situation, if the coin got flipped
3000 times and came up heads each time, you would suspect the coin was loaded,
because we can depend on the probability’ that 3000 flips will come up heads roughly
half the time. Mendel understood this long before most biologists and based his
experiments and his generalizations on laws of probability.
Summer 2007
32
1 1. Again the “combination” is a multiplication: (A + 2Aa + a)(B + 2Bb + b)(C + 2Cc +
c) = ABC + 2AaBC + aBC + 2ABbC + 4AaBbC + 2aBbC + AbC + 2AabC +
abC + 2ABCc + 4AaBCc + 2aBCc + 4ABbCc + SAaBbCc + 4aBbCc + 2AbCc
^ 4AabCc + 2abCc + ABc + 2AaBc + aBc + 2ABbc + 4AaBbc + 2aBbc + Abe
+ 2Aabc + abc. Now with a cross of three traits, the same generalization applies.
Among the generation of offspring resulting from self-fertilization of the hybrids, if
n = the number of traits, in this case three, then 3" = 27, the total number of constant
and hybrid types; 4" = 64, the number of individuals; and 2" = 8, the number of
different appearances.
12. Mendel was fortunate in his experiments to have chosen constant-breeding traits that
did vary freely. Around the turn of the century geneticists realized this is not always
so. Traits resulting from genes on separate chromosomes vary freely; traits resulting
from genes on the same chromosome do not.
13. In the crosses of hybrids (AaBb) with pure dominants (AB), the first offspring
generation should have appeared entirely dominant, the actual types being AB, ABb,
AaB, and AaBb. These types could be demonstrated by allowing the offspring to
self-fertilize.
14. Thus, if a trihybrid plant were AaBbCc, its pollen cells and seed cells could be ABC,
AbC, aBC, abC, ABc, Abc, aBc, or abc. Or if tetrahybrid plant were AaBbCcDd,
its pollen and seed cells could be ABCD, AbCD, aBCD, abCD, ABcD, AbcD,
aBcD, abcD, ABCd, AbCd, aBCd, abCd, ABcd, Abed, aBcd, or abed, etc. If such
pollen and seed cells were crossed with an all recessive plant, each of the different
types of pollen or seed cells would be equally likely to combine with an all recessive
type: abc, or abed; so that with numerous matings, we could expect equal numbers
of all possible kinds of offspring.
15. Notice that this conclusion differs from those hybridists who noticed that both
maternal and paternal characteristics appeared in offspring. Mendel had numerical
data establishing identical ratios of characteristics from either parent.
1 6. Mendel implies this by planning to use the alternative hybrid colors to test whether
more than one pollen grain can fertilize the same seed plant. Whether he performed
this experiment is unknown.
17. Naegeli’s students reported that Naegeli never credited other researchers for what he
had learned from their work. Instead he said, “Tn my opinion.. .to display the
connection between things....’” (litis, 1932 [184])
Washington Academy of Sciences
33
THE GALAXY NO ONE WANTED TO SEE
Gene G. Byrd and Sethanne Howard
University of Alabama, USNO (retired),
ABSTRACT
NGC 4622 is an intriguing galaxy. Byrd, Buta, and Freeman (2003)
found that its strong lop-sided pair of outer arms is leading in the
clockwise rotating disk. It has a weak single inner trailing arm that
nonetheless lasts through 520®. This runs counter to accepted theory
which assumes that all spirals have outer trailing arms. This galaxy is a
problem calling out for an explanation. The VBl (Visual/Blue/Infrared)
data provide an independent determination that the inner single arm
trails and that the outer pair leads. Fourier decomposition confirms the
result.
INTRODUCTION
Spiral galaxies are quite common in the Universe. They appear to
be disks in space, often described as having a fried egg shape. When seen
from the side, they are remarkably thin compared to their extent by a
factor of at least one to fifty; i.e., the diameter of the disk is more than
fifty times the thickness of the disk. They also tend to be flat, occasionally
(rarely) tilting up and down at the edges like the brim of a fedora hat. Most
have a bulge at the center (the yolk of the egg). Although they are disk like
in appearance they are not plain; they have a wide variety of internal
structure and form some of the most striking objects in the sky. Described
as spiral arms, these structures can be as simple as a pair of beautiful spiral
arms (e.g., M51, Figure 1) or as complex as a multi-armed galaxy {e.g.,
M99, Figure 1). They can have two, three, four, or multi-arms; they can be
flocculent in nature. Some spiral galaxies have a bar shape that stretches
across the middle.
Although, these galaxies, when viewed from the side, appear very
thin; most of them probably have a more spherical ‘halo’ of “dark matter”
surrounding the disk. This halo is said to be dark matter because it emits
no light but exerts a gravitational force like ordinary matter. Computer
simulations support this theory because a perturbed rotating stellar disk
without a stabilizing halo of some mass will fragment or become chaotic.
Summer 2007
34
Figure 1 - M51 (left) and M99 (right)
The winding of spiral arms is an important dynamical and
kinematic feature of any spiral galaxy. Whether they trail or lead the
direction of rotation of the disk has been of interest since spirals were first
noticed. Figure 2 is a schematic of CW rotating disks with trailing and
with leading arms. Trailing is defined as winding outward opposite the
sense of disk orbital motion; leading is winding outward in the same sense
as the disk orbital motion.
Figure 2
leading
Historically, astronomers took both viewpoints.
Based on theoretical studies B. Lindblad (1941)
said spiral arms led. E. Hubble (1943) said they
trailed. Based on kinematic studies where one
can unambiguously distinguish the near side of
the disk, G. de Vaucouleurs (1958) determined
that they trailed. He used an asymmetry in the
dust distribution to determine which side of the
minor axis is the near side. The dust asymmetry
is caused by the fact that in an inclined galaxy,
dust in the near side is silhouetted against the
background starlight of the bulge and disk. This
determination combined with the arm winding
sense outward CW or CCW on the sky plus
Doppler shift observations permitted verification
that the arms trail. In galaxies with significant
nearly spherical bulge components, this effect
can be seen even if the galaxy is more nearly face-on. In their discussion
of density wave theory, Binney and Tremaine (1987) argue that leading
arms are not likely to be seen because they would quickly unwind and
become trailing arms.
trailing
Theoretical studies indicate that some tidal encounters (where a
companion galaxy passes nearby the primary) can generate a leading arm.
Computer simulations support the theory by showing that retrograde
encounters in the presence of a large halo-to-disk mass ratio can produce a
Washington Academy of Sciences
35
leading arm. Yet, although leading arms do have a theoretical basis, the
general consensus still has been that spiral arms trail.
INITIAL WORK ON NGC 4622
NGC 4622 is a spiral galaxy which at first glance appears to have a
deceptively normal appearance. Figure 3 shows a Hubble Space Telescope
photo of it. However, in a blue sensitive, ground based image of NGC
4622, Byrd, et al (1989) pointed out that in addition to the pair of strong,
lopsided outer arms winding outward CW, NGC 4622 has a weaker, single
inner arm winding outward CCW inside a ring. In other words, NGC4622
has two nested oppositely winding spiral arms. Thus either the inner single
arm or the outer pair of arms of NGC4622 must be leading.
Figure 3 - NGC 4622
NGC 4622 is a southern, ringed spiral galaxy in the Centaurus
cluster putting it about 40 Mpc (Mega-parsecs) or 130 million light years
away. As said before, it has two strong CW outer arms wrapping around a
large bulge along with the inner single CCW arm. As is typical of such
galaxies, the bulge contributes about half of the light. The galaxy is almost
Summer 2007
36
face-on with an inclination (tilt from face-on) of about 19® (see Buta,
Byrd, and Freeman 2003). Even though it does have this unusual arm
pattern, NGC 4622 is not unique. There are at least three other galaxies
that show features in common with NGC 4622 ’s spiral pattern; e.g., the
Blackeye Galaxy (NGC 4826), ESO 297-27, and NGC 3124.
NGC 4622 provides one of the most convincing cases of a rare
leading spiral arm in any galaxy. Using multi-band ground-based surface
photometry, Buta, Crocker, and Byrd (1992) showed that the single inner
arm is a stellar dynamical feature, not the result of a chance dust
distribution of young stars or gas. Their ground based photos verified the
existence of the inner arm in the stellar disk. So, either the outer arms lead
and the inner arm trails, or the outer arms trail and the inner arm leads.
Accepting the general consensus that pairs of arms trail Byrd,
Freeman, and Howard (1993) provided an «-body simulation which
produced a single leading inner arm and two outer trailing arms. To
reproduce the NGC 4622 structure they included a massive halo (eight
times the mass of the disk) and a plunging retrograde encounter of a small
(1/100 the mass of the disk) perturber. This produced both a single inner
and outer pair of arms. In their simulations, they found that a retrograde
encounter with a massive perturber cannot form both trailing and leading
arms in one galaxy. It only takes a small companion to produce the global
structure.
VERIFYING WORK ON NGC 4622
As a result of the initial discovery in a blue-light ground-based
photograph, the ground-based image of the stellar disk, and the
simulations, the situation with NGC 4622 was thought to be settled. To
double check the conclusions, Buta, Byrd, and Freeman (2003) obtained a
set of four new observations: Hubble Space Telescope images in four
colors; a Cerro Tololo Inter- American Observatory (CTIO) Fabry-Perot
Ha velocity field; CTIO three color images; and Parkes 64m 21 -cm radio
data. Analysis of the velocity field showed that the kinematic line of nodes
of the disk is in position angle +22®.
These new verifying observations provide convincing arguments
that the two clockwise outer arms lead the CW rotating disk instead of
trail. This means, therefore, that the inner arm trails. To show this, Buta,
Byrd, and Freeman (2003) used an extension of the method that de
Washington Academy of Sciences
37
Vaucouleurs used. De Vaucouleurs used Doppler shifts to determine
which half of the major axis of a galaxy is receding from us relative to its
center, and then used an asymmetry in the observed dust distribution to
determine which side of the minor axis is the near side. The dust
asymmetry he used is not intrinsic but is caused by the fact that, in an
inclined galaxy, dust in the near side is silhouetted against the background
starlight of the bulge and disk. In galaxies with significant nearly spherical
bulge components this effect can be seen even if the inclination is less
than 45°. See Figure 4 for a schematic of the approach.
What this means is the following. Figure 5 shows a high contrast
image of NGC 4622 with the kinematic line of nodes shown as the white
line. The image is processed such that the redder the object is the whiter
its image is. The bluer the object is the darker the image is. East is to the
upper left and north is to the upper right. The field is 1.47' square. One can
see that eastward (left) of the axis there are thin white strips indicating
dust clouds. Westward of the axis any clouds are much less visible.
This means that the east side of the galaxy is nearer to the observer
than the west side. Once we know which side is nearer then we use
velocity measurements to show which way the galaxy is rotating. Figure 6
shows a grayscale version of the velocity map of this galaxy. It is not very
clear in the grayscale version (galaxy velocity maps are most useful when
presented in color); however, there is a well defined line of nodes, marked
in black with the upper (north) side moving away from us relative to the
disk center and the lower (south) coming toward us. On the left and right
of the line of nodes there is no toward or away motion relative to the
center. Figure 7 is a diagram combining the arm winding on the sky, the
line of nodes, the motions toward and away, and finally the way the disk
must turn on the sky. The galaxy turns CW on the sky.
Once we know that the disk is turning CW on the sky, and we
know that the outer pair of arms is unwinding CW, then we know that the
outer pair of arms leadsl This means that the inner single arm trails.
This result is unpopular because it runs counter to accepted dogma
that all spirals have outer trailing arms. The most common comment is ‘T
can’t see the inner arm”. One straightforward way to address this
particular issue uses Fourier analysis.
Summer 2007
38
Washington Academy of Sciences
39
Figure 5 -high contrast image of NGC 4622. Line of nodes is marked in
white. The part to the left of the line turns out to be the nearer side.
Toward
Figure 6 - velocity map of NGC 4622
Summer 2007
40
Which arms lead or trail?
Two arms wind out
in direction of
orbital motion
i.e they lead^^
-■k/i
Orbital
Motion
M ^ Single arm
winds out
opposite orbit
motion i.e. it trails.
Figure 7 — diagram of data from photo, dust silhouettes, and Doppler shifts
and resulting arm senses.
Washington Academy of Sciences
Figure 8 - Fourier decomposition of the I band image of NGC 4622. This
is the stellar background light distribution. Top left: sum o^m = 0-6 terms.
Top right: w = 0 image. Bottom left: m = 1 image. Bottom right: m = 2
image. North is to the upper right, east to the upper left. Each frame covers
a field of 1.50' x 1.43'.
ANSWERING THE COMMON QUESTION
Figure 8 shows the Fourier decomposition of the infrared image of
NGC 4622 - this wavelength region reveals the stellar background light
distribution. The m = 0 image shows the distribution for the underlying
exponential disk. Stellar light typically follows an exponential distribution
in a disk. The m = 1 image maps the single arm (one-fold symmetry). The
m = 2 image maps the outer pair of arms (two-fold symmetry). Note that
Summer 2007
42
the /77 = 1 arm wraps around 540°. The inner arm is a clear component of
the NGC 4622 structure.
CONCLUSION
So the galaxy that no one wants to see is clearly there with its
unusual structure defying the accepted idea that all spirals have outer
trailing arms. Byrd. Howard. Buta. and Freeman continue their work on
this intriguing spiral investigating other methods to support their
conclusion that the outer arms lead. Regardless, it is an unpopular idea.
When this initial result was presented at a recent professional conference
one of the attendees said “You are the backward astronomers who found a
backward galaxy”. Backward or not, NGC 4622 is clearly worth more
study.
REFERENCES
Binney, J. and Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dy namics, Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press
Buta. R., Crocker. D., and Byrd. G. G. 1992, 103, 1526
Buta. R., B\Td. G. G., and Freeman. T. 2003, AJ, 125, 634
Byrd. G. G. et al. 1989, Celestial Mech., 45, 31
Byrd. G. G., Freeman, T., and Floward. S. 1993, AJ, 105, 477
de Vaucouleurs, G. \95S,ApJ, 127, 487
Hubble, E. 1943, ApJ, 91, 112
Lindblad. B. 1941, Stockholms obser\atoriums annaler, bd. 13, no 10, Stockholm
Almqvist & Wiksell. 3
Washington Academy of Sciences
43
Clouds of Moon Dust to Shade the Greenhouse
Curtis Struck
Dept, of Physics and Astronomy
Iowa State University
Abstract
The scientific evidence for global wanning caused by anthropogenic
greenhouse gas emissions has become strong and clear. Steps towards
mitigation by the international community appear to be tentative,
increasing the possibilities of catastrophic consequences. Temporary
relief from global warming might be achieved with the aid of some
astronomical shade. Various possibilities are considered here, in
particular the idea of shading by placing large amounts of dust at stable
locations on the Moon’s orbit is considered in more detail. Although
this would literally be a massive undertaking, it has several intrinsic
advantages for providing decades of temperature reduction, until
greenhouse gas inputs can be reduced.
Introduction
The start of this year brings a new report from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which pronounces the
evidence for global warming ‘‘unequivocal” and the likelihood that
anthropogenic sources are responsible “very likely.” As detailed in a
summary in Science [1] there is increasingly strong evidence against the
points raised by “climate contrarians.” There is now broad acceptance of
these points by scientists and, to judge by press reports, increasing
acceptance by the public.
While this represents important progress, recognition of the disease
is still a long way from a cure. Most discussions and work at present
center on developing new technologies for sustainable energy sources and
atmospheric and climate amelioration [2]. We would seem to be decades
away from putting these technologies into service and benefiting from
their service. Moreover, we can expect those technologies to be used first
in the developed world and, perhaps, to be partially offset by
industrialization in developing economies. One is left to wonder if
significant reductions of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are
possible before human populations peak and begin to decline, which is not
likely until the middle of the present century [3].
Summer 2007
44
Nonetheless, in the long run, new, sustainable energy technologies
must be the solution, with help from eventual population reduction. In the
meantime, is this destined to be the century of climate misery?
To avoid that fate, increasing attention has been given to the
possibility of making planetary scale changes to ease the greenhouse
heating. The most widely discussed of these is pumping material (e.g.,
sulfates) into the atmosphere to enhance cloud formation, since clouds can
reflect much incoming solar radiation back out into space [4]. This might
well be preferable to some of the consequences of increasing global
warming, though we might have to sacrifice some blue skies.
Another possibility that has been considered is constructing large
reflectors or light diffusers at some point between the Earth and the Sun
(see e.g., [5]). The idea of a diffuser is probably more attractive than
global cloud seeding, because, while a reduction of the incoming solar
flux by a few percent would hardly be noticeable on the ground, it would
yield a very important global warming reduction. In fact, a decrease of
about 0.1% would be enough to negate the current extra heating due to
increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (see discussion in [6] for
more details).
Moreover, nature has provided an especially good location for such
a diffuser. This is the so-called first Lagrange point (or LI) between the
Earth and the Sun. This is a balance point, where the sum of gravitational
and centrifugal forces on the Earth in its orbit around the Sun is zero. In
the absence of these primary forces there are still some small secondary
ones, but the bottom line is that very little energy or rocket fuel would be
required to keep the diffuser at this point. Since LI always lies between
the Earth and the Sun a diffuser located there would orbit with the Earth
around the Sun and always be on the job.
A Little Celestial Mechanics
A beautiful result of classical mechanics is that any two massive
bodies, which have small sizes relative to their separation and are in orbits
bound by their mutual gravity, have five Lagrange points, L1-L5,
accompanying them (see Figure 1 below). Like LI all of these Lagrange
points orbit with the two bodies, so their relative positions remain
unchanged. And, like LI, the combined gravitational and centrifugal
forces cancel. Thus, a particle with negligible mass compared to the
primary bodies placed at any of these points, with the appropriate orbital
Washington Academy of Sciences
45
velocity, could stay there indefinitely. The introduction of this third,
“massless” particle explains why this is called the “restricted three-body”
problem. Three of the Lagrange points are located on the line connecting
the two primary bodies: LI is between the two primaries and L2 and L3
are located on the other side of each primary. It is intuitively obvious that
there should be a balance point like LI. It takes a bit more thought to
accept the notion that while a particle at L2 or L3 would be pulled in the
same direction by the gravity of both primaries, centrifugal force can
balance that, and at some specific distance the period of the resulting orbit
is the same as that of the primaries. The full story is more complicated, but
we do not need to go into the details.
Figure 1 L1-L5 for the Earth-Sun system
What about the other two Lagrange points? If we take the line
segment connecting the two primary bodies as the base of two equilateral
triangles, one on each side of the segment, then L4 and L5 are the
remaining vertices of the triangles. Stated another way, as seen from one
of the primaries, the L4 and L5 points always orbit 60° ahead and behind
the other primary and are at the same distance.
These latter two Lagrange points differ from the first three in
another important respect. While a small particle placed on any Lagrange
point with the appropriate velocity will stay on that point, if the placement
is a little bit off any of the first three Lagrange points, the particle will drift
away from those points. The technical term for these points is “unstable
equilibria.” We can view the situation as like a ball placed near the top of
a dome. It may balance there, but if slightly displaced, it will roll off.
Points L4 and L5 are stable equilibrium. Particles placed very near them
will orbit around the Lagrange points (and with these points around the
Summer 2007
46
center of the system). They don’t “roll” far away. More precisely, there
are finite sized regions around L4 and L5 where this is the case. Outside of
these basins particles will roll away.
The Sun, Earth, and Moon make up an approximate, “hierarchical”
three-body system. The term hierarchical means that, at least
approximately, we can treat the bodies in this system two at a time.
Specifically, because the distance between the Earth and the Moon is
much smaller than the distance to the Sun, we can approximate the Earth-
Moon orbit as independent of the Sun. Then the Earth-Moon system can
be viewed as one object orbiting the Sun. In this approximation we have
two sets of Lagrange points, one in the Earth-Moon system and one in the
Earth(+Moon)-Sun system. It was the LI point in the latter system that we
talked about as an ideal location for a diffuser. Would any other Lagrange
points be useful in a similar way?
Since none of the other Lagrange points of the Earth-Sun system
lies between the two bodies, the answer is no for them. On the other hand,
all the Lagrange points in the Earth-Moon system can pass between the
Earth and the Sun at some time, though two of them can only do so during
a solar eclipse, so a shade or diffuser at those locations would serve little
purpose. The remaining three points have a different disadvantage. They
are much closer to Earth than the Earth-Sun LI point, so to block the cone
of light stretching from the disk of the Sun to the disk of the Earth a shade
would have to be nearly the size of the Earth. It was bad enough at the
Earth-Sun LI point where the size of the shade would have to be of order
1000 km; this is much worse.
And there’s more bad news. These remaining three Lagrange
points, one on the opposite side of the Earth from the Moon and the
triangular L4, L5 points, are on the lunar orbit relative to the Earth. This
orbit is tilted 5° from the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. Thus, a shade at
any of these points, with an angular size equal to the Sun’s 0.5° as seen
from the Earth, would usually not block the Sun, because it would be more
than 0.5° out of the Earth’s orbital plane. It would only block the Sun
during the appropriate eclipse seasons.
It appears that the answer to the question above is no, no other
Lagrange point will be useful unless we could make a very large shield or
diffuser. However, maybe we shouldn’t give up too quickly. The regions
of stability around the L4, L5 points can be quite large. This opens the
possibility that, instead of constructing a solid shade there, we could have
Washington Academy of Sciences
47
a large number of smaller particles orbiting the L4, L5 points and blocking
or scattering solar radiation. But what sort of particles?
Dust Clouds
Since a huge mass of material would still be required, the answer is
that the particles should be small and easy to produce or obtain. Small
rocky particles or dust grains would seem to fit the bill nicely. I explored
this idea in a recent journal article [6], which I will refer to as Paper 1. The
purpose of the present article is to try to explain the results of the earlier
paper to a wider audience and outline some extensions of that work.
One of the estimates of Paper 1 was that the mass of dust grains
needed to fill a cloud of constant density, of radius 5°, and which cuts off
more than 50% of the sunlight trying to pass through it even near the
edges is of the colossal order of 10^"^ kg. Such a cloud would be big
enough to partially block the Sun for at least several hours every lunar
month of 29 days, or twice a month for clouds at both L4 and L5.
In the eclipse seasons when the Sun passed behind the center of the
cloud, with much more material along that path than along a path near the
edge, the obscuration would be nearly total (see Figure 2). This would
seem to be overkill, with more net shading than the few percent needed
(when averaged over both shaded and not shaded times). Moreover, given
the huge mass of material required for a spherical cloud, it would seem
that a relatively thin dust disk would be better. This would reduce the
amount of material needed by at least a factor of a few.
Sun Moon Earth
Figure 2. Schematic, not to scale, of the Sun, Earth, and Moon in eclipse alignment.
The dotted circle represents the Moon, and the dotted lines illustrate the umbral
eclipse shadow, which subtends a very small area on the Earth’s surface. The solid
circle at the Moon’s position represents a ‘moon cloud’ with a diameter more than
twice that of the Moon. In this case, the area of the Moon’s shadow encompasses the
Earth, in part because the length of the shadow triangle is so much larger.
Even with that improvement, we are still left with a couple of very
big questions. The first is where do we get that mass of dust? The second
Summer 2007
48
is could we really keep the dust grains in stable orbits with the desired
configuration? There are several possible answers to the first question.
However, the scope of the engineering involved in those ‘answers’ is
beyond the scope of my work, or any other work to date, so I will be brief
and general in describing them. With the results of Paper 1 I can describe
the answer to the second question about orbits in more detail.
COMETS OR MOON DUST?
There are a few reservoirs in the astronomical neighborhood with
enough dusty material to supply these clouds: the Moon and near-Earth
orbiting comets or asteroids. With regard to the latter, the amount of dust
needed is roughly comparable to that contained in large comets or
asteroids. That said, the next question is how to get it to the desired
location? In fact, a good deal of study in recent years has centered on the
question of how to keep comets and asteroids that intersect the Earth’s
orbit (near Earth orbiting [NEO] objects) well away from any location
near the Earth. Nonetheless, many of the ideas explored for diverting such
objects are also relevant to capturing and relocating them. Of course, all of
these ideas are untested, certainly on any large scale. However, one of
them seems especially appropriate for present purposes.
This is what might be called a solar system tractor, or a telescope
tractor, and has been studied by Melosh et al [7]. The idea is to construct a
very large mirror (tens to hundreds of kilometers in size) to collect and
focus sunlight onto a part of the object. The intensity of the solar radiation
would be so great that a very high temperature would be created at the
focus, and material at that point vaporized and ablated off the surface. As
the ablated material expands, almost explosively, away from that point it
functions like a jet or rocket engine, slightly modifying the orbit of the
object. Similar natural jets modify a comet’s orbit when it comes near the
Sun. Of course, for present purposes we need much more than slight
orbital modifications and larger modifications would be very hard to
achieve with the size of objects we want to move. Even to achieve the
slight orbital modifications, the huge mirrors that are needed would have
to be very thin, yet sufficiently rigid (and probably segmented), to be
within the scope of our space transport technology (see ref. [7]).
A possible solution to this problem is to use the tractor mirrors to
slice a large comet into smaller pieces, or to use small comets, so that the
tractor would be able to capture and transport the pieces to the Earth-
Washington Academy of Sciences
49
Moon system. If this could be done, it might make sense to take it a few
steps further by parking these pieces at some distance from the system (but
still orbiting it), and cut them into still smaller pieces for transport to L4,
L5. The idea here is to allow no piece of potentially dangerous size to be
transported near or within the lunar orbit (see Paper 1).
Nonetheless, space transport on this scale, though theoretically
possible, seems rather fantastic. Even if the technology of each part is
feasible, the overall complexity is enormous, and the price would be as
well. The Moon is nearer to hand and getting the dust material from there
might be easier. The additional difficulty in that case is getting the
material free of the lunar surface gravity. However, containers of material
might be launched off the lunar surface in rapid succession by mass
drivers. The possibility of constructing space colonies at the L4, L5 points
was considered in the 1970s, as was the possibility of obtaining material
from the Moon via mass drivers (e.g., [8]). Of course, this project would
require a huge mass of material, among other problems. It would almost
certainly take years or decades to launch it. Thus, we should be sure that it
would not be lost on a shorter timescale than it could be built up.
There are several reasons for concern on this topic, even though I
said that there are large basins of orbital stability around the L4, L5 points.
This statement was based on the approximation that the Earth and the
Moon orbit in isolation, so one of the first worries is that this
approximation is not accurate enough for present purposes. However,
earlier calculations have shown that stable or nearly stable orbits are
possible even including the effects of the Sun’s gravity [9].
Celestial Mechanics of Dust in the Solar Wind
More worrisome are the effects of radiation pressure on small dust
grains. Solar sailing has been discussed in the space exploration literature
as possibly a very efficient way to travel around the solar system.
However, to get enough momentum from sunlight to move a spacecraft
would require huge sails. This is not the case for small (e.g., of order 10
micrometers) dust grains. Because of their small mass the force of the
Sun’s gravity exerted on them is small, but they intercept enough sunlight
that they can serve as their own solar sails. The Sun tends to blow them
away, rather than pull them in. For grains a couple of orders of magnitude
larger this is not the case, gravity dominates. Grains a couple orders of
magnitude smaller don’t “see” light waves, whose wavelengths are larger.
Summer 2007
50
and so are not influenced by them. Most of the grains from comets have
sizes in the sailing regime (see Paper 1); probably a large fraction of the
lunar grains would too.
If we want to build a dust shade this is potentially very bad. Even
if it was partially self-shading our dust shade could blow away faster than
we could build it up. However, the primary result of Paper 1 was that
stable orbits are still possible. The dust grains orbit the Lagrange point,
which is orbiting the Earth (or more precisely the Earth-Moon center of
mass). In these orbits, the grains are sometimes moving away from the
Sun. Then the solar radiation pressure accelerates them forward on their
orbit. This tends to move them into larger orbits, and ultimately free of the
Lagrange region. This is the fate of most dust grains placed on arbitrary
orbits in the Lagrange region. After they leave that region they may leave
the Earth-Moon system directly, or suffer encounters or collisions with the
Earth or the Moon (see Figure 3). Typical timescales for this process range
from a few months to a few years.
Figure 3: Each panel shows a single dust grain trajectory in the plane of the Moon’s orbit
subject to the gravity of the Earth and the Moon, and the solar radiation pressure in a
rotating frame. The radiation force is that appropriate to an unshaded grain of radius 100
microns (see text). Each grain begins at the lower Lagrange point (L5), with the Sun
located on the positive x-axis, and is followed until its distance from the Earth (circle
labeled E) is more than twice that of the Moon (circle labeled M). The L4, L5 Lagrange
points are labeled. L 1 lies between the Earth and the Moon, and L2 and L3 are on either
side of the Earth and Moon, on the y=0 line. The circle on the left gives the position of
the Earth, and the circle on the right gives the position of the Moon. This is from Paper 1,
where further details are given.
Washington Academy of Sciences
51
On the other hand, sometimes the grains are moving against the
solar pressure and have their orbital velocities diminished. This
acceleration can also drive them out of the system. However, in the case of
some special orbits, this acceleration and the previous one can balance
each other, and grains can remain on these orbits for very long periods of
time (see Figure 4). This balancing act cannot be accomplished within one
orbital period, so these special orbits are not simple circles or ellipses. In
fact, the balancing seems to take many basic orbital cycles, which
introduces a second, long period. Over the course of this long period the
orbits alternately grow and contract. So the good news is that dust grains
could be placed on orbits where they would remain a long enough time to
provide useful shading. The bad news is that if we placed many of them
on orbits of different sizes to form a circular disk of radius equal to 5° as
seen from the Earth, then the different orbits would expand and contract at
different rates, leading to collisions and ejection from the stable orbits.
This would occur on a timescale that depends on the density of grains in
the disk. If you make a denser disk to block more sunlight, you increase
the collision rate and decrease the lifetime of the disk. It is not yet known
if there is an optimal balance between these effects.
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
-0.8
-0.9
-1
-1.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 0.2 0,4 0.6 0.8
X X
Figure 4: Trajectories as in Fig. 1, but with an expanded scale around the initial position
at the Lagrange point (L5). The upper Lagrange point and the Earth and Moon are not
shown. The scale is the same in both panels. In the left panel the unshaded grain size is
assumed to be 1000 microns and in the right panel it assumed to be 100 microns. The first
30 lunar months of each trajectory is shown, but these persistent trajectories have been
found to stay within the outer positional boundaries shown here for 1000 lunar months.
Taken from Paper 1.
Moreover, there are other loose threads in this story of special
orbits. First of all, the calculations of the special orbits in Paper 1 included
the gravitational effects of the Moon, Earth, and Sun, and the solar
Summer 2007
52
radiation pressure, but orbits in the Earth-Moon system were
approximated as circular. Katz [10] has shown that orbits around L4, L5
are less stable when the real elliptical orbit of the Moon is used. It remains
to be shown that the special orbits retain their long-term stability in this
case.
The calculations of Paper 1 were based on another simplifying
assumption - that the grains were confined to the orbital plane of the
Moon. Since this plane is not tilted much with respect to the Earth’s
ecliptic orbital plane, this is not a very efficient way to make a shade. It
would be much better to have the dust disk tilted perpendicular to the
ecliptic plane. The existence of the special stable orbits with such
orientations has not been demonstrated. Ideally such orbits exist for a wide
range of tilts. If this is true then the dust particles could be placed initially
on rings with different tilts to minimize the collisions described above
resulting from orbital expansion and contraction.
It is possible that there exists a nearly perfect orbit that contracts to
its smallest size in the eclipse seasons when the Earth, Sun, and L4, L5
points all nearly line up, but expands to a size of 5° when L4, L5 are tilted
that far from the ecliptic. Then we would only have to construct one ring
of material around that orbit to get maximal shading from minimum mass.
Of course, there are always tradeoffs. All of the special orbits are
finely tuned in the sense that the initial positions, velocities, and sizes of
the dust grains must be accurately specified to put them on those orbits.
The fine-tuning needed for orbital placement might be very extreme in the
case of the perfect orbit. In that case, passive delivery by mass drivers of
minimally processed lunar surface dust would be unlikely to get many
particles of the correct size into the perfect orbit.
More research on the orbital dynamics needs to be done to address
these “loose ends.” Some of these questions raise intrinsically beautiful
problems in celestial mechanics, which may merit study regardless of their
practical applications. However, this paper is concerned with a particular
practical application, so we’ll leave the celestial mechanics and move on
to other issues. Assuming that the dust shade could be constructed among
the most important of these issues are possible collateral effects. There are
several.
Washington Academy of Sciences
53
Collateral Damage
One of the most obvious is over-eooling from too much shading, or
continued shading after we have gotten greenhouse gas emissions under
control and no longer need the shade. This would seem to be a fairly
simple problem. Because of the required fine-tuning of the particle orbits,
there will be inevitable losses due to particle-particle collisions and other
effects, so the shade will gradually disappear. If this was not occurring fast
enough, more particles could be introduced on intersecting orbits to
enhance collisions and speed removal by radiation pressure.
Another potential problem associated with particle loss is that, as
mentioned above, some of the particles are lost by hitting the Moon or the
Earth’s atmosphere. In the latter case, these small particles would bum up
in the upper atmosphere, eliminating the problem at lower altitudes.
However, the increased flux of what are essentially micrometeorites might
pose difficulties for orbiting satellites. Extra shielding might be required.
Without a firm knowledge of the mass of dust needed for shading, and the
exact orbital characteristics of the dust, it’s not possible to accurately
estimate the loss rate and the particle flux.
There is another complication - a significant fraction of the dust on
the lunar surface is ferromagnetic [11]. The fact that such dust could be
picked up with magnets might facilitate its acquisition. This also suggests
that Earth’s magnetosphere could also deflect the magnetic grains,
partially shielding satellites. It is also tme that grains in space often hold a
small electric charge, which would also respond to the Earth’s magnetic
field. These effects need further study.
If the shade scatters sunlight significantly when it’s between us and
the Sun, then it will reflect sunlight in our direction when it’s opposite the
Sun. Since the scattering reflection is in a wide range of directions, it will
not offset the shading much, but it will make for a very bright night sky.
For example, if we have a reflecting ring several times the area on the sky
of the Moon, but of only slightly less surface brightness, the overall
brightness will be of a similar order to that of the full Moon. Since L4 and
L5 are 60° ahead and behind the Moon on the sky, there will be significant
reflected illumination almost all of the time, except possibly near the times
of new moon. Even then, if the optical depth is of order unity, so a
significant amount of light scatters through the rings, then they will still be
bright.
Summer 2007
54
Nights that are never dark might well have adverse ecological
effects [12]. They would be the bane of astronomers. However, artificial
lighting could be reduced. This would both help the astronomers and
reduce energy consumption. It could be worse. If the dust grains were not
confined to the vicinity of L4 or L5, but diffused around the whole lunar
orbit, a much wider swath of sky would be brightened.
Every technique for globally reducing greenhouse warming will
have its own unique consequences. Excessive cloudiness resulting from
cloud seeding has already been mentioned. If a diffuser located at Earth-
Sun LI were hit by a meteoroid it might be bent or wrinkled in such a way
that it focuses light on some region of the Earth, with potentially
catastrophic results. Large-scale construction accidents are possible with
all of these techniques.
Conclusions?
So what is the bottom line on the prospects for these techniques to
contribute to the mitigation of global warming? In truth, we don’t know
yet. The costs and the possible risks have not been researched in depth.
Key technologies have not been demonstrated on the scale required. It
might not be far off the mark to say that we are at a comparable stage of
development to the manned space program in the mid- 1940s, when V2
rockets showed some of the possibilities, but there was still a long way to
go. It is clear that any of these global techniques requires much more
interdisciplinary study before they can be implemented. Investigating the
consequences thoroughly would require a huge effort.
That seems to be a major weakness of these global solutions - that
it would take as great an effort to realistically predict the consequences as
it would to implement the technology. A partial answer to this objection is
that most of these techniques could be tested on a small scale and
gradually implemented on a larger scale. In fact, that is exactly what has
happened with anthropogenic carbon emissions.
It should also be pointed out that these techniques cannot directly
solve all of problems resulting from carbon emissions. For example, these
problems include increasing the acidity of the oceans. Reducing
atmospheric temperature increases will have no direct effect on that
problem, though it might have indirect consequences. As discussed in the
introduction, the ultimate solutions must be worked out on the ground, not
in space.
Washington Academy of Sciences
55
References
[1] Kerr, R. A., “Scientists Tell Policymakers WeTe All Warming the World,”
Science, 315, 754 (2007). (Also see http://wwvv.ipcc.ch/)
[2] “Working Group III Report: Mitigation of Climate Change,” Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environmental Program (2007).
(Available at: http://www.iDcc.ch/)
[3] “World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision,” Dept, of Economic and
Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat (2005). (Highlights available online
at: http://www.un.org/popin/data.htm])
[4] Kerr, R. A., “Pollute the Planet for Climate’s Sake?,” Science, 314, 401 (2006).
[5] Teller, E., L. Wood, and R. Hyde, “Global Warming and Ice Ages: I. Prospects
for Physics-Based Modulation of Global Climate Change,” from the 22"^^
International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, Sicily, Italy, August 1997.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory preprint UCRL-JC-128715 (1997).
[6] Struck, C., “The Feasibility of Shading the Greenhouse with Dust Clouds at the
Stable Lunar Lagrange Points,” J. Brit. Interplanetary Soc., 60, 82 (2007).
[7] Melosh, H. J., Nemchinov, I. V., and Zetzer, Y. 1., “Non-Nuclear Strategies for
Deflecting Comets and Asteroids,” in Hazards due to Comets and Asteroids (ed.
T. Gehrels) 1111-1134 (Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1994).
[8] Johnson, R. D., and Holbrow, C. (eds.) Space Settlements A Design Study:
NASA SP-413 Ch. 2 (NASA, Washington, 1977).
[9] Mignard, F., “Stability of L4 and L5 Against Radiation Pressure,” Cel. Mech.,
34,275 (1984).
[10] J. I. Katz, “Numerical orbits near the triangular lunar libration points”, Icarus,
25,356,(1975).
[11] Elmer, B. C., and Taylor, L. A. “Lunar Regolith, Soil, and Dust Mass Mover on
the Moon,” in 38th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, (Lunar and
Planetary Science XXXVIII), p. 1662 (2007).
[12] Rich, C., and Longcore, T. (eds.) Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night
Lighting (Island Press, Washington, D. C., 2005).
Summer 2007
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
BOOK REVIEW:
STIMULANTS OF CHANGE
57
Joseph F. Coates
Consulting Futurist, Inc., Washington, D.C.
Architectural Glass Art, by Andrew Moor, Rizzoli International
Publications, NY 1997, 160pp.
Loving the Machine: the Art and Science of Japanese Robots, by
Timonthy N. Hornyak, Kodansha International, NY 2006, 160 pp.
Let the Cat Turn Round, by Alexander King, CPTM Smart Partners,
London 2006. 419 pp.
The work of the members of the Washington Academy of Sciences
falls into several broad categories: disciplinary, multi-disciplinary, pan-
disciplinary, trans-disciplinary, and many other disciplinary groups yet to
be named or conceived. Books that hit the target on particular disciplines
or projects are usually widely reviewed. For many of us, more interesting
are books on the edge of a discipline, perhaps not quite part of it or not
recognized as part of it, or on the conceptual fringe. Another category
reflects the current status of a trans, pan, or multifaceted discipline. That
is happening today with more things than we can keep up with, for
example, in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Another category
announces or proposes a new “cross-disciplinary-group.” They often are
stimulating and raise new visions of intellectual progress in the minds of
many. Finally, books with broad, but unspecified implications for many
areas are always welcome. Whether truly original or sound, they can
powerfully stimulate our creative juices. What follows are three books that
fit one or more of the above characterizations.
Glass is a prosaic material — dishes, tumblers, windowpanes, all kinds of
household products like Pyrex — but oh so ordinary. In my lifetime, 1
remember the heralding of Pyrex and its expansion into the household,
and then a few decades later, the technology for making nearly absolutely
flat glass by floating the melt over molten metal. But what else has
Summer 2007
58
happened recently? Not very much that raises a great deal of attention. At
least that was my opinion, until I came across Andrew Moor’s book,
Architectural Glass Art. The book is comprehensive and authoritative
from several points of view. The work of individual architects using glass,
and the nature of the materials and the processes they use to achieve their
effects are described in detail and profusely illustrated. The book begins
with words that are frankly architecturally artistic in the narrow
conventional sense of the word — windows, panels, doors, doorways, and
especially illuminated areas. Once you or at least I understand what is new
and different, we can appreciate the sophisticated, demanding and
architecturally significant developments. The chapters well illustrate the
marvelous situation in which structural and aesthetic become one. All of
these things are illustrated and well described in the work of a particular
glass artist, or a pastiche of them. The book gets technically more complex
when it turns to kiln and how glasses of different colors can be put
together to create an image or an abstract pattern. One especially beautiful
image, “A Portrait in Glass,” is 52 X 68 feet.
As we all know from a look at the classic glass in cathedrals and
elsewhere, lead has played a central role in pictures, panels, and mosaics.
In the chapter on transcending lead. Moor goes well beyond traditional
techniques to show how one can make elaborately colored walls of glass
without the need for lead, by using glues and lamination techniques.
The concept of lamination of glass is particularly interesting to me since it
opens up a concept which is totally alien to my amateur knowledge of
glass, but beautifully illustrated in the book — the kinds of architectural
uses it can be put to. Historically, our sense of decorative is the material
in a cathedral in which the individual pieces of glass are outlined in lead to
hold the pieces together. Now it is as if one had a broad pencil or crayon
and then filled in between the marks with particularly cut pieces of glass.
Contemporary techniques carry us far beyond that and allow for the
production of 50, 100, or a thousand-fold repetition of patterns, that can
then become a structural component in a building. The ones illustrated in
Moor’s book tend to be in business sites, but by no means is the technique
limited to that market.
Toward the end of the book. Moor moves back into what you might think
of as more traditional things done with leaded glass, to extremely
complicated and complex patterns beyond anything you can do with
leaded stained glass. Again this opens up incredible opportunities for new
industrial and construction uses.
Washington Academy of Sciences
59
The book moves on from there to glass sculpture and how that sculpture
can show up in many, many forms — towers made up of cubes of glass
panels, glass in stainless steel structures, and a whale weighing 1.6 tons.
The antique (traditional) glass of a single color is laminated to toughened
float glass, which is drilled and bolted to the steel structure, where it sits
in a pool of water with more water cascading down a rugged stepped
feature. This is on a scale which dwarfs the people who might be looking
at it. If you want to be excited by something new in material science and
by something new in implications for many other areas than mere art,
spend a few hours with Andrew Moor’s Architectural Glass Art.
Robots are about as multidisciplinary as one can get. For decades, the
Japanese have been the world’s leader in the use of robots in
manufacturing and elsewhere. For years, my explanation of their
technological leadership was simple. They are chauvinistic and do not
want foreigners in their country; therefore, the scut work could be turned
over to robots. Further, as an aging society with fewer people able to
work, they could use robots to assist them in personal life. In
manufacturing, robots free up labor for work that cannot yet be done
except by people. But that is far from the gist of the story, it just reflects
my culturally limited view of why the Japanese are in the robotics lead.
By being culturally limited, one is precluded from thinking freely about
the relationships among art, science and robots.
The remedy for that cultural lapse is Timothy N. Homyak’s book. Loving
the Machine. The Japanese passion for automata goes back centuries.
There is even today an annual ritual in which colorful, life-sized,
incredibly dynamic manikins or other things are ceremonially carried to
the ocean in the ceremony to be washed and cleansed.
Before modem tools were available, the Japanese used pneumatic controls
to give a smooth flow to the robot. Robots were designed often for
specific purposes like serving tea and, in historic times they had limited
but real capabilities to switch to other tasks. Many of the complex displays
were so well loved that detailed descriptions of how to make them became
part of the craft literature in Japan. The utilitarian objects automated were
not limited to these marvelously complex, animated dolls, but include
master works such as the eternal clock which shows the position of the sun
and the moon as seen from Kyoto, with a glass dome surmounting the
overall stmcture.
Summer 2007
60
Through the early to late century, Japanese engineers made giant,
humanoid-like robots and others that were closer to a human look.
Incidentally, one of the main problems they confronted was having the
robots maintain balance while walking. The contemporary period caught
up with cartoons, comic books, and movies. The Japanese moved toward
much more complex, yet much more humanlike robots to provide a range
of activities and actions. With the coming of the more industrialized use of
robots in factories and goods handling, robots have moved away from a
humanoid look and look more like the skeletal form of what you might
think of as the innards of a robot.
Throughout all this period, the Japanese society has been open to robots
and what they have done and what they can do. Their expectations of what
robots can do are unlimited. The lack of limitation shows up nicely in the
enthusiasm for a pet robot to keep one company, to make one feel good, to
assist with various minor chores.
In the Honda ads, the robot, Asimo, reflects a long history of coming to
grips with the problem of robotic walking. Asimo moves slowly in the
Honda ads. The robot’s falling forward and regaining his stability is a
growing challenge for the Japanese engineers. The Japanese have moved
to extremely lifelike robotized mannequins which can do things like give
information to questioning patrons in a department store. The Japanese
specialist in robots, Masahiro Mori, has tried to lay out the connection
between what robots look like and their acceptability. In doing that, he
discovered an unexpected pattern. He reported in a 1970 article that
human likenesses attached to industrial robots are unattractive, even
repellant, because they are so unfamiliar and unhumanlike. Both of those
dimensions — humanlike and familiar — grow with toy robots, stuffed
animals, and humanoid robots. Robot acceptance collapses when it looks
like a corpse, has a prosthetic hand, or looks like a zombie. Acceptability
increases with automated dolls that look like healthy people.
There is one primary lesson from Loving the Machine. If we do not
understand the cultural context of new developments, we can be off-base
and inadequately sophisticated in our understanding of the new
technology, that is, what it can do and can be allowed to do.
Who was at the top of the heap, the King of the Hill, in European and
Western world science policy since World War II? It seems like an inane
question.With scores of countries having science policy mavens, with
gigantic research companies, and with governments having cadres of
Washington Academy of Sciences
61
people in seience policy, who could ever claim that position? As far as I
know, no one has claimed it, but my candidate for the single most
important science policy figure, at least between the UK and the US since
World War II, was Alexander King. King, in his 98^*’ year, died in England
while I was writing this review. His is a model for autobiographies by
public figures. He covered his career in engaging detail with the social
dynamics and the scientific actions each receiving their proper place. All
of this is done in a good spirit. He managed to handle the descriptions of
the naysayers, the road blockers, the tired old bureaucrats, those who are
not willing to do anything, by relating how, over six decades, he
circumvented them or recruited them, even in spite of themselves, to do
good work.
King is perhaps best known to the public as the cofounder of the Club of
Rome, which was set up to deal with what is now called “the
problematique.” The problematique is a term developed to describe the
interrelatedness and complexity of issues in our society. It presents a new
framework for thinking about the issues. Since no issue stands alone, no
issue can really be framed in the form of a simple definable system. Public
policy issues link in many dimensions and ways over time, space,
technology and nationality.
King was so successful in his science policy work in terms of the British
military in World War II that he assumed the responsibility as the primary
liaison on S&T between the United States and the UK. At the end of the
war, he helped shape British science policy, but perhaps even more
important, he helped to shape European science policy. His work
promoted the establishment of the great East-West sponsored think tank in
Austria, IIASA (the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis).
The formation of the group in Austria was a policy tour de force in that it
was the first fully outfitted, working East- West cooperative venture in
science policy and scientific analysis.
King was a primary driver toward the establishment of the Pan-European
business school known as INSEAD (LTnstitut European d’ Administration
des Affaires). INSEAD raised the level throughout Europe of policy
thinking for business, industry and government and, in particular, gave
cogency to science policy which it had previously lacked.
The value of King’s book is not just in the kind of facts mentioned above,
but in revealing the grace, charm, and high degree of practical Judgment
that King showed in all of his work, and in his numberless interactions
Summer 2007
62
with people from every kind of background and virtually every European
country. He was the consummate bureaucrat, who goes beyond the basic
rules of bureaucracy, that success has no reward and failure is dreadfully
sanctioned. Rather what he did was manipulate bureaucracies in many
different ways that are described throughout the book. The book’s curious
title. Let the Cat Turn Round: One Man ’s Traverse of the 20^^ Century, is
a metaphor for one of his core concepts in dealing with people and
governments. If one has a cat in one’s lap and rubs its fur the wrong way,
the cat is not likely to jump down and run away, but slowly and steadily it
turns itself around so that your strokes are in the direction that the cat
prefers.
In scope, significance and international effectiveness. King was
unparalleled in the western world for two-thirds of a century. In a lovely
way, without it being intrusive, he effectively weaves his family life into
recounting his highly diverse broad experience, his hobby interests, and
range of friends who participated in recreational activities with him. Each
gets his proper place and full acknowledgement.
The book should be of interest to anyone who does work or has worked in
a bureaucracy. It should be of even greater interest to anyone who
attempts to manage in a bureaucratic framework, and it should be of
extreme value to those teaching management in our business schools,
universities, or the military.
Washington Academy of Sciences
THE 2007 ANNUAL MEETING
AND AWARDS BANQUET
63
THE FLOWER- AND FERN-FILLED ATRIUM and broad patio of Virginia’s
Meadowlark Botanical Gardens was again on May 1 the site of the
Academy’s annual banquet. Following a superb dinner, the banquet chair
Emanuela Appetiti welcomed over 70 members and guests to the event.
Meadowlark photographer Bill Folsom gave the beautifully-illustrated
after-dinner address on “The Butterflies of Meadowlark.”
Peg Kay, as chair of the Awards Committee,* presided over the
presentation of awards, as follows:
* Members of the Awards Committee; Murty Polavarapu, E. Eugene Williams, Katharine
Gebbie, Daryl Chubin, Michael Cohen, Donna Dean, Albert Teich, Martin Ogle.
Summer 2007
64
Environmental Sciences
Leo Shubert Award for
College Teaching
Krupsaw Award for Non-
Traditional Teaching
Bernice Lamberton
Award for Pre-College
Teaching
Neal T. Fitzpatrick,
Executive Director, Audubon
Naturalist Society
David Hammer,
Professor of Physics and Curriculum &
Instruction, University of Maryland
Florence D. Fasanelli,
Director, DC Fellows for the
Advancement of Mathematics
Education, AAAS
Karen Shrake,
Fourth Grade Classroom Teacher,
Burtonsville Elementary School
Martin Ogle
Ali Eskandarian
Ali Eskandarian
Paul Hazan
The award presentations were followed by remarks by the retiring
president Bill Boyer and incoming president Alain Touwaide, which
follow below. President Touwaide then introduced the other incoming
officers.
Officers, 2007-2008
President, Alain Touwaide
President-elect: Albert Teich
Vice President for Administration: Gerard Christman
Vice President for Membership: Murty Polavarapu
Vice President for Affiliate Affairs: E. Eugene Williams
Vice President for Junior Academy: Paul Hazan
Secretary: James Cole
Treasurer: Russell Yane III
Past President: Bill Boyer
Members At Large
Frank Haig, S.J., 2005-2008
Jodi Wesemann, 2005-2008
Vary Coates. 2006-2009
Peg Kay, 2006-2009
Sethanne Howard, 2007-2010
Donna Dean, 2007-2010
Washington Academy of Sciences
65
THE STATE OF THE ACADEMY
REMARKS OF PRESIDENT BILL BOYER
(2006-2007)
It was a dark and stormy night in 1898 when Alexander
Graham Bell and some of his science-minded cronies got together and
decided to create the Washington Academy of Sciences. They created the
Academy because they felt the need for an organization bigger than
themselves and bigger than the eight professional science societies they
represented. Now, they could conduct activities in the name of the
Academy that extended the exchange of ideas to a new level.
The objective of this new umbrella organization was to stimulate
interest in the important sciences of the time. It became a new tool that
allowed them to do more in the growing influence of Washington, DC.
The goals of today’s Academy have changed little, but we look
much different than those first few years at the turn of the last century.
Today our membership includes 59 professional non-profit societies and
more then 400 individual members, of which more than 200 are Fellows.
We also have a handful of institutional members — a relatively new
membership category.
In the past year we conducted the Nanotechnology Forum and the
second Capital Science event for affiliated societies, and conducted or co-
sponsored, both here and in Europe, several related to Condominiums on
the Moon. Our Junior Academy, lead by the untiring dedication of Paul
Hazan, helped 1,500 students in the DC public school system learn about
life through science competitions. The Academy Journal continues to be a
prestigious science publication, under the leadership of Vary Coates. I
can assure you the Board of Managers has been busy.
These are Just the highlights of a strong organization that is led by
a group of dedicated individuals, just as the Academy was back in 1898.
And, like it was back then, there are two things always needed: more
people helping, and money to reach further and do more. We are therefore
embarking on a two-pronged program: 1) - to further involve our
members in our activities and 2) - to raise funds - and more funds.
Summer 2007
66
I say to you, that the state of the Academy is strong; this evening’s
event, and the caliber of awardees, is an indication of our strength. This
Awards Banquet, here at beautiful Meadowlark Botanical Gardens, was
made possible by the folks at Meadowlark, where our common interests
have made them a valued affiliated institution.
So, I ask you to consider the institutions you know that may have
similar interests as the Washington Academy. Think creatively and talk
with any one of our officers about opportunities to do more in the name of
science, and to help pay our bills.
Washington Academy of Sciences
67
THE YEAR TO COME: REMARKS OF
IN-COMING PRESIDENT ALAIN TOUWAIDE
It is a great pleasure, an honor and a privilege for me to be the in-coming
President of the Washington Academy of Sciences. I wish to thank all the
Members of the Academy, of the Board and of the several committees
who have contributed to the success of this evening, particularly
Emanuela Appetiti, Chair of the Banquet Committee, and Peg Kay, Chair
of the Awards Committee.
The Academy is an old institution founded a little bit more than a century
ago. It has been recently rejuvenated thanks to the actions of Peg Kay and
the new dynamism she injected into the Academy, continued under the
current Past President, Doug Witherspoon, and the about to be Past
President, Bill Boyer, both of whom I thank for their actions, along with
Peg Kay’s work.
The Academy rewards scientific achievement and excellence, and more
recently it has started to showcase Washington scientific activity through
the biannual Capital Science conferences. These conferences were
initiated by Peg Kay and will be held again next year, March 29-30. On
the other hand, the Academy encourages new vocations through the Junior
Academy, brilliantly guided by Paul Hazan. And, on top of all that, the
Academy rewards the best scientists in the Washington area by means of
such awards as those granted tonight. Last but not least, the Academy
publishes a quarterly Journal, edited by Vary Coates.
Though extremely positive, this activity might be expanded. The Academy
should indeed be more engaged in the scientific and intellectual activity of
the Washington area and attract new scientists in every field of the
episteme, the Greek word for knowledge. It should engage a dialogue with
universities, think-tanks, libraries and the many museums in the
Washington area, and open its doors to those who might aspire to be
tomorrow’s best scientists, that is, the students. Rather than becoming a
one-century old respectable institution, the Academy should be an
engaging forum for world class science, not only present, but also future.
This is what I invite you to contribute to, so that the Academy will become
a forum which displays the Washington science in the making. To achieve
Summer 2007
68
this goal — or at least to start an effort toward it — I am pleased to have in
the Board a group of authoritative scientists, leaders and policy makers, as
well as scholars, advisors and science administrators, and I do hope to be
able to report substantial progress in that sense in one year, on the
occasion of the 2008 banquet.
In the meantime, I wish to thank you all for your confidence in me, your
support, your collaboration and your help and input, and I invite you to
pursue your action. See you next year.
Washington Academy of Sciences
69
2007/8 Board of Managers for the Washington Academy of Sciences
Ali Eskandarian (center) presents the
Leo Shubert award for College Teaching to
David Hammer (right) and the Krupsaw
Award for Non-Traditional Teaching to
Florence D. Fasanelli (left)
Paul Hazan (left) presents the Bernice
Lamberton Award for Pre-College Teaching
to Karen Shrake (right)
Summer 2007
70
Albert Teich presenting the award for Daryl Chubin (left) presenting the award
Distinguished Career in Science to for Behavioral and Social Sciences to
Marilyn E. Jacox Cora Marrett (right)
Katharine Gebbie (left) presenting the
award for Physical Sciences to
Harvey B. Moseley (right)
Donna Dean (center) presents the awards
for Health Sciences to Kathryn Louise
Sandberg (left) and Francis S. Collins (right)
Michael Cohen (left) presents the award
for Mathematics and Computer Science to
Dan Kalman (right)
Martin Ogle (left) presents the award for
Environmental Sciences to
Neal T. Fitzpatrick (right)
Washington Academy of Sciences
71
William Folsom, speaker at the 2007 Awards Banquet
Photographs courtesy of Albert Teich
Summer 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
73
In Memoriam
This memoriam is reprinted from MAA Online (with permission from
Mathematical Association of America, copyright holder), at the request of
Michael Cohen, past president and Fellow, WAS.
James E. White 1946-2004
By Dan Kalman
James E. White, founder and director of the Mathwright Library at
http://www.mathwright.com, as well as principal creative force
behind the Mathwright software family, died suddenly and
unexpectedly July 18, 2004. He was 58 years old, and is survived by
his wife, Sally, four children, and two grandchildren. White received
his Ph.D. at Yale University under William Massey in 1972 in
Algebraic Topology. He held permanent and visiting faculty positions
at many institutions, including the University of California at San
Diego, Carleton College, Bates College, Kenyon College, Spelman
College, California State University Monterey Bay, and Stetson
University. His non-academic experience included work at Jet
Propulsion Laboratory. Most of his work on the Mathwright project
was done during his tenure at the Institute for Academic Technology at
the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
White will best be remembered in the mathematics education
community for his vision, creativity, and leadership in the applications
of technology. He recognized early that computers offer a unique and
powerful tool to inspire, captivate, and entrance students, and for 30
years devoted himself to innovative uses of computer technology. His
philosophy was that students will learn best when they ask and answer
their own questions, and he understood that computer software can
create powerful environments in which students are empowered to do
so. His dream and vision was to develop a tool with which teachers and
students could easily create these environments. The hundreds of
activities housed in the Mathwright Library, created by scores of
teachers and students from around the world, bear witness to his
successful realization of this vision.
Summer 2007
74
White had a long and active involvement with the Mathematical
Association of America. He was co-director of the MAA’s Interactive
Mathematical Text Project, which introduced dozens of mathematicians
to the development and use of interactive instructional computer
activities. He was also Principal Investigator for another MAA project,
the Web Educators Librar\^ Collection of Mathematical Explorations
(WELCOME). This project combined three areas of MAA concern:
educational technology, professional development, and increasing
access to mathematics for under-represented groups. The project, which
was incorporated into the MAA’s SUMMA Program, worked to bring
interactive computer activities to students of minority serving
institutions by offering professional development opportunities and
mentoring to the faculty of these institutions. His final project for the
MAA, completed shortly before his death, involved incorporating
materials from the WELCOME project in the MAA’s MathDL digital
library.
James White had a life-long fascination with the world of ideas. He was
first a mathematician, with several books and scholarly papers to his
credit. He was widely read in mathematics, philosophy, and physics,
studied differential geometry and its applications to relativity, and had a
particular interest in foundational issues in quantum mechanics. At the
time of his death, he was deeply immersed in research in these areas,
and had recently completed a paper presenting an innovative new link
between the geometric ideas of ancient Greece and the modem subject
of special relativity. At the same time, he was fascinated by the issues
of cognition and learning, and read widely in this area.
White was also a prolific author of interactive computer activities for
students, and for their teachers. The Mathwright Library includes
nearly a hundred of his contributions, displaying an amazing wealth of
creative and inspiring lessons. There is a lunar lander that accurately
models the physics of rockets, an activity that puts students in the
driver’s seat of a space shuttle to achieve orbit, a beautifully rendered
three dimensional version of tic-tac-toe, and a physically and
geometrically accurate simulation of pocket billiards. Most impressive
of all, perhaps, is his multimedia sur\^ey of gravitation, in which the
user navigates a Myst-like virtual world, while retracing the
mathematical and physical evolution of our understanding of gravity.
Washington Academy of Sciences
75
And this is just a small sample. He recently completed a calculus
textbook, integrating both traditional text lectures and interactive
explorations.
Those who knew him well recognized both a powerful intellect and a
gentle and generous spirit. There was poetry at the heart of his life and
work, and he saw poetry and beauty in mathematics. Who else would
choose Monet’s Water Lillies as the setting for an interactive
exploration of buoyancy and boat construction?
Through his softw^are and internet library, James White inspired and
influenced mathematics students and educators from all over the world.
He offered generous encouragement to all who met him, and carried on
correspondence with a host of collaborators, followers, and students.
An invited paper session in his honor was held at the January 2005
Joint Mathematics Meetings in Atlanta. His memory will continue to
inspire all who knew him. His energy, enthusiasm, creativity, and
originality will be sadly missed.
Summer 2007
AFFILATED INSTITUTIONS
The National Institute For Standards and Technology
Meadowlark Botanical Gardens
The John W. Kluge Center of the Library of Congress
Potomac Overlook Regional Park
Washington Academy of Sciences
DELEGATES TO THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
REPRESENTING AFFILIATED SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America
American/Intemational Association of Dental Research
American Association of Physics Teachers
American Ceramics Society
American Fisheries Society
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
American Meteorological Society
American Nuclear Society
American Phytopathological Society
American Society for Cybernetics
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
American Society of Plant Physiology
Anthropological Society of Washington
ASM International
Association for Women in Science (AWIS)
Association for Computing Machinery
Association for Science, Technology, and Innovation
Association of Information Technology Professionals
Biological Society of Washington
Botanical Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
District of Columbia Institute of Chemists
District of Columbia Psychology Association
Eastern Sociological Society
Electrochemical Society
Entomological Society of Washington
Geological Society of Washington
Historical Society of Washington, DC
History of Medicine Society
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington Section
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Northern Virginia Section
Institute of Food Technologies
Institute of Industrial Engineers
Instrument Society of America
Marine Technology Society
Mathematical Association of America
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
National Capital Astronomers
National Geographic Society
Optical Society of America
Pest Science Society of America
Philosophical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Society of American Military Engineers
Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine
Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Technology Transfer Society
Washington Evolutionary Systems Society
Washington History of Science Club
Washington Chapter of the Institute for Operations
Research and Management Science
Washington Paint Technology Group
Washington Society of Engineers
Washington Statistical Society
World Future Society
Paul Arveson
J. Terrell Hoffeld
Frank R. Haig, SJ.
VACANT
Ramona Schreiber
David W. Brandt
Michael Greeley
Kenneth Carey
Steven Arndt
Kenneth L. Deahl
Stuart Umpleby
VACANT
Kimberly Hughes
Daniel J. Vavrick
Mark Holland
Marilyn London
Toni Marechaux
Emanuela Appetiti
Lee Ohringer
F. Douglas Witherspoon
Barbara Saffanek
VACANT
Alain Touwaide
James J. Zwolenik
James J. Zwolenik
David Williams
Ronald W. Mandersheid
Robert L. Ruedisueli
F. Christian Thompson
Bob Schneider
VACANT
Alain Touwaide
Douglas Griffith
Gerard Christman
Murty Polavarapu
Isabel Walls
Russell Wooten
Hank Hegner
Judith T. Krauthamer
Sharon K. Hauge
Duane Taylor
Jay H. Miller
VACANT
Jim Cole
VACANT
Vary T. Coates
G. Foster
VACANT
Darren Roesch
VACANT
Bill Boyer
Clifford Lanham
Jerry L.R. Chandler
Albert G. Gluckman
Russell Wooten
VACANT
Alvin Reiner
Michael P. Cohen
Russell Wooten
I
(
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 637
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Return Postage Guaranteed
Media Mail
U.S. Postage
PAID
Merrifield, VA
Permit NO. 1502
ERNST MAYR LIBRARY
MUSEUM COMP ZOOLOGY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
26 OXFORD ST
CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138-2902
ms
<232>SL
Journal of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Volumew
Number 3
Fall 2007
Contents
Editor’s Comments i
Instructions To Authors ii
Sethanne Howard and Mark Crandall, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder .....1
Tom Meylan, A Theory of Personal Drive Satisfaction Strategies .......19
Jim Cole, A Family of Scientists... 39
Harvey C. Hayes, reprint, Measuring Ocean Depths by Acoustical Methods 43
Jim Cole, Three Generations of Acoustic Research 76
Al Teich, Book Review 79
Selected Minutes of the Philosophical Society 81
World Future Society Annual Meeting 107
Member News 109
ISSN 0043-0439
Issued Quarterly at Washington DC
Washington Academy of Sciences
Founded in 1898
Board of Managers
Elected Officers
President
Alain Touwaide
President Eiect
Albert H. Teich
Treasurer
Russell Vane III
Secretary
James Cole
Vice President, Administration
Gerrald Christman
Vice President, Membership
Murty S. Polavarapu
Vice President, Junior Academy
Paul L. Hazan
Vice President, Affiliated Societies
E. Eugene Williams
Members at Large
Sethanne Howard
Donna Dean
Vary T. Coates
Frank Haig, S J.
Jodi Wesemann
Past President: Bill Boyer
AFFILIATED SOCIETY DELEGATES:
Shown on back cover
Editor of the Journal
Vary T. Coates
Associate Editors:
Sethanne Howard
Emanuela Appetiti
Elizabeth Corona
Alain Touwaide
Academy Office
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 631
1200 New York Ave NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202/326-8975
The Journal of the Washington Academy
of Sciences
The Journal is the official organ of the
Academy. It publishes articles on science
policy, the history of science, critical reviews,
original science research, proceedings of
scholarly meetings of its Affiliated Societies,
and other items of interest to its members. It is
published quarterly. The last issue of the year
contains a directory of the current membership
of the Academy.
Subscription Rates
Members, fellows, and life members in good
standing receive the Journal free of charge.
Subscriptions are available on a calendar year
basis, payable in advance. Payment must be
made In U.S. currency at the following rates.
US and Canada $25.00
Other Countries 30.00
Single Copies (when available) 10.00
Claims for Missing Issues
Claims must be received within 65 days of
mailing. Claims will not be allowed if non-
delivery was the result of failure to notify the
Academy of a change of address.
Notification of Change of Address
Address changes should be sent promptly to
the Academy Office. Notification should
contain both old and new addresses and zip
codes.
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to WAS, Rm.631,
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20005
Journal of the Washington Academy of
Sciences (ISSN 0043-0439)
Published by the Washington Academy of
Sciences 202/326-8975
email: was@aaas.org
website: www.washacadsci.orq
MCZ ,
LIBRARY
THE EDITOR COMMENTS: ^ 5 2007
harvard
For well over a century the Washington Academy of Scle^c*es^
sought to encourage and celebrate scientific achievements wherever they
occur, and especially to highlight those of scientists and scientific
institutions in our own region. In this issue we take special notice of the
outstanding accomplishments of a one who was a member of the Academy
six decades ago, and whose groundbreaking work is echoed in the
scientific careers of members of his family over two following
generations.
Other papers deal with topics of current and growing interest. Sethanne
Howard explains in lay terms the origin and manifestations of post
traumatic stress disorder, a condition that is only slowly becoming
understood even by mental health experts, although the term is sadly
becoming more familiar to Americans as a steady stream of veterans
return from Iraq. Tom Meylan contributes another in his series of papers
using concepts from evolutionary psychology to develop a theory that
seeks to illuminate patterns of collective human behavior within
organizations. A1 Teich reviews a book by Nancy Mathis that vividly
describes the course of killer tornados that have struck over the past 60
years, and the ways by which science and technology have greatly reduced
the human toll exacted by these vicious storms.
In November, the Academy will hold its annual reception for
representatives of our more than 60 affiliated scientific societies and
institutions. Two of those societies are featured in this issue. The World
Future Society’s annual meeting is described. Selected “Minutes” of the
meetings of the Philosophical Society — featuring summaries of talks by
distinguished local scientists — are reproduced, the third time we have
been privileged to do this in recent years, thanks to Recording Secretary
Ron Hietala. We urge other Affiliates to allow us the same opportunity.
Fall 2007
II
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
The Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences is a peer-
reviewed journal. Exceptions are made for papers requested by the editors
or positively approved for presentation or publication by one of our
affiliated scientific societies.
We welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientific research reports
and papers on technology development and innovation, science policy,
technology assessment, and history of science and technology. Book
reviews are also welcome.
Contributors of papers are requested to follow these guidelines carefully.
• Papers should be submitted as e-mail attachments to the chief editor,
vcoates@mac.com, along with full contact information for the primary or
corresponding author.
• Papers should be presented in Word; do not send PDF files.
• Papers should be 6000 words or fewer. If more than 6 graphics are included the
number of words allowed will be reduced accordingly.
• Graphics must be in black and white only. They must be easily resized and
relocated. It is best to put graphics, including tables, at the end of the paper or in
a separate document, with their preferred location in the text clearly indicated.
• References should be in the form of endnotes, and may be in any style
considered standard in the discipline(s) represented by the paper.
Washington Academy of Sciences
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
What Happens in the Brain?
Sethanne Howard and Mark W. Crandall, MD
US Naval Observatory, retired, Wash. DC
Reisterstown, Maryland
Abstract
This is a brief look at the processes that lead to post traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD) and what happens in the brain. We take a light handed
approach to the insides of the brain, not to demean but to promote
understanding. PTSD is a disabling misery that is best understood
through information.
Introduction
Everyone Suffers Trauma At Some Time. The first
documented case of psychological distress was reported in 1 900 BCE, by
an Egyptian physician who described a hysterical reaction to trauma. One
in two people will be exposed to a life-threatening, traumatic event in their
lifetime. It can be the death of a loved one; it can be war; an attack,
robbery, rape; it can be the loss of a job. Usually the person recovers after
some time, and the trauma fades to a memory - painful but not
destructive. Trauma, however, is not the same as the mental disorder
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress D^isorder. Now and then, the body cannot
quite heal the trauma, and there are long-term changes in the brain. If the
trauma is severe, prolonged, or life threatening, the aftereffects can last for
years, physical damage can occur, and one suffers the debilitating effects
of PTSD.
While many people experience traumatic events, not everyone
develops PTSD. The best epidemiologic or population studies indicate that
about 7% of Americans have had or will have PTSD at some point in their
lives, and that about 5% have PTSD at any given time. Women are twice
as likely as men to develop PTSD. At a cost of over 44 billion dollars a
year in medical and related costs, PTSD is a disorder well worth the time
to understand.
Many people in the Western world take a “blame-the-victim”
approach to avoid dealing with mental illness. One might call it the “just”
disease. your fault you are miserable, you know. You just can 7 cope,
Fall 2007
2
you just feel sorry for yourself you just don 7 want to get well, you just
want everyone else to solve your problems for you, you just” ... you just ...
you just ... this list goes on and on. A litany of ‘you just.’ That word ‘just’
causes a lot of problems. The ‘just’ speaker is not going to understand.
The speakers will not try to understand. They have already closed their
minds and will make sure that you know how bad their situation is
compared to yours. Shame, denial, and misinterpretation are used to bad
advantage {quit asking for sympathy, quit over-reacting, etc.).
The medical profession tries to help. The World Health
Organization publishes a diagnosis book: the International Classification
of Diseases (ICD). ICD-6 contained, for the first time, a section for mental
disorders. The history of mental disorder in the United States is
interesting. In 1840 medicine used only one category for mental illness:
idiocy/insanity. By 1860 there were seven categories: melancholia, mania,
epilepsy, monomania', paresis", dementia, and dipsomania'". It was not
until after World War II that a more useful set of definitions appeared. In
1952 the first edition of the American Psychiatric Association's
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, DSM-I, appeared. The DSM-IV, the
current edition, is essentially the diagnoses ‘dictionary’ for mental
illnesses. It is a thick book available at bookstores. We now have the 9^*^
edition of the ICD-9. So the current set of diagnoses is barely fifty years
old.
There are some very interesting things in the DSM-IV. Is there a
firm separation between a ‘physical’ disorder and a ‘mental’ disorder? The
answer is no. Every physical disorder has a mental component; every
mental disorder has a physical component. Together they form two
interlocking pieces of the whole person. We can’t have one without the
other. It can even happen that the person with schizophrenia has the flu!
Unfortunately we (and medicine) do not have a good word for this, so we
keep the two words ‘physical’ and ‘mental’. A good physician understands
this.
Society and even many physicians assume that the DSM-IV
classifies people not disorders. Actually the book does exactly the
opposite: it classifies disorders not people. Society persists in this cruel
fiction of classifying people instead of disorders. They use mental illness
to define the whole person {You are a manic-depressive.). Try to picture a
person pointing a finger and saying '‘You are a broken bone. ” Hopefully
they sound equally silly.
Washington Academy of Sciences
3
Sometimes, however, they don’t. Add to this misuse of words the
additional injury that Americans still assign shame to mental illness and
associate it with a character or moral flaw, and we have the terrible
situation where countless mentally ill people suffer the doubly cruel injury
of the ravages of the disease and the scorn of an uncomprehending society.
Insurance companies use the DSM-IV and ICD-9 to assign
payments. All insurance claims insist on a diagnosis code {It may be
buried deep in the paperwork, but it is there). So physicians and other
mental health professionals use it. This is both good and bad. It is good,
because it enables a payable insurance claim. It is bad because it forces a
diagnosis that may not be fully appropriate. The DSM is a laudable
attempt to organize mental illnesses into definable categories. If mental
illness had well separated and defined categories this would work well.
Unfortunately mental illness does not separate out into nice, neat labels.
So the codes in the DSM-IV are far from perfect, just as the treatment and
diagnosis of mental illness are not perfect. A good mental health
professional knows this and will provide appropriate diagnoses for the
insurance claim; one that will minimize any social damage. Then they will
throw it away and treat you as a whole person, using whatever method is
best for you.
The diagnoses of mental disorders are now multi-level. (Actually
they concocted five diagnoses axes. If you are mathematically inclined,
this is a 5D space. If you are not mathematically inclined, they have five
ways to classify the disorders, and it can often take all five to identify the
disorders properly.) That is good for the doctors, but it makes it more
complicated for the non-professional to have a clear definition to use. A
broken bone is an easy one. All the sub-types, severity levels, even
decision trees in the DSM-IV make it hard to find a single word to use for
mental illnesses. “I suffer from ....” When those dots really are paragraphs
of words - well you see the problem.
People shy away from saying these things anyway because society
has this unhealthy association of shame with a mental disorder. That leads
to a lot of misconceptions. There are sixteen types of mental disorders.
One is the anxiety disorder class. PTSD is an anxiety disorder. The DSM-
IV diagnosis code for PTSD is 309.81. Panic attacks belong in the anxiety
disorder class. Clinical depression, a common mental disorder, is a mood
disorder.
4
Trauma and PTSD
1 shall concentrate on PTSD. Most people are familiar with the
definition concerning soldiers in a war; however, PTSD has expanded
from its original wartime definition to include all people, not just soldiers.
It can result from a single or prolonged life-threatening event. The
memory can bury itself deep in the mind and, for years afterward, torment
the person with all kinds of strange unexplained feelings. Some people
come through these events and recover. Some do not. Why the difference?
As yet, probably no one knows.
PTSD is difficult to treat, even difficult to diagnose. The disorder
carries an especially strong stigma of dishonor and moral weakness.
During the first and second world wars, people called some soldiers
suffering from PTSD and stress breakdown “cowards” or “deserters.” The
military has come a long way since then in recognizing the seriousness of
this disorder. Since PTSD is actually the body’s natural response to an
injury, it is not really an illness in the same sense as depression. It is,
however, often accompanied by depression and other mental illnesses.
There are six criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD. (1) The person goes
through or sees something that involves actual or threatened death or
serious injury. The person responds to this with intense fear, helplessness
or horror. (2) The person then relives this traumatic event through dreams,
or recollections. He or she can behave as if the trauma is actually
happening right then, and can react strongly to events that even resemble
the original trauma. (3) The person tries desperately to avoid this, and to
avoid anything associated with the trauma, in fact, may not even
remember the trauma yet still react strongly to certain stimuli. (4) The
person often has difficulty sleeping and concentrating. He or she may be
hyper-vigilant. All this lasts longer than (5) a month and causes (6)
significant distress in daily life.
Perfectly straightforward, isn’t it? Someone is “scared to death,”
leaving behind an injured brain that relives the event and stays scared all
the time. The next edition of the DSM will contain an updated definition
for PTSD that will widen the criteria to include emotional as well as
physical trauma.
Typically one thinks of trauma as a single life-threatening event;
however, trauma can also arise from an accumulation of small incidents
rather than one major incident. Examples include: repeated exposure to
horrific scenes at accidents or fires, repeated involvement with serious
Washington Academy of Sciences
5
crime, breaking news of bereavement caused by accident or violence,
especially if children are involved, repeated abuse (verbal, physical, or
sexual), regular intrusion and violation of one’s physical or psychological
space (bullying, stalking, harassment, domestic violence), etc. People who
are especially vulnerable to these events are emergency workers {e.g.
police, firemen, and hospital workers), crime scene investigators, children,
and soldiers. Some mental health professionals now use the term
Prolonged Duress Stress Disorder (PDSD) when the symptoms are the
result of a series of events.
Although it is fair to think of PTSD as an injury rather than an
illness, it is important to remember that a disabling injury is as difficult to
handle as a disabling illness. Unfortunately, the sufferer may not know he
or she suffers from PTSD, and may think the suffering is “madness.” The
sufferer is afraid to tell anyone because of the social stigma associated
with emotional distress. To make things worse, even professionals often
misinterpret many of the PTSD symptoms as psychotic ones. They
misdiagnose the person and therefore provide possibly harmful treatment
and drugs.
PTSD is not madness. It is a normal reaction to undue and deadly
stress. The body says ''Hey! 1 am not designed to work this way. If I let this
go on there will be irreparable damage. I will do something dramatic now
to reduce or eliminate the stress. We ’re talking survival here, dummy P'
And so the body takes action.
What is going on here? A lot of things. The human body is a
marvelous system. It is also a complex system, full of feedback loops.
Mess too badly with some of those loops, and one result can be long-term
disabling PTSD.
The Two -Part Body
Let’s look at the whole system before we leap into the brain. Not
the ‘whole’ body - there is too much detail inside a simple human body -
so we start with a two-part body: the automatic part versus the thinking
part. One thing the human body does is keep the basics going so you do
not have to think the basics. The basics are too, well, too basic to be left to
our thinking skills. This is the automatic part. What does this automatic
system do for us? The autonomic {the word is linked to autonomous)
nervous system is an entire little brain unto itself. It keeps on going
whether we think about it or not. It runs bodily functions without our
Fall 2007
6
awareness or control. {Thank goodness, too. I would hate to think my way
into every single breath.) It has two pieces: the sympathetic system and
parasympathetic system.
The sympathetic system handles automatic responses to the “fight-
or- flight” condition. {Yo, Fm in danger here body, get with the program
and do something.) These responses are actions like dilating the pupils and
blood vessels {got to have room for that increased blood flow^, increasing
the heart rate, and putting digestion on hold. {You don't have time to eat
right now, worry' about that hunger later. I am busy fighting off that tiger
on your behalf)
The parasympathetic system does other things, including slowing
down the heart, constricting the pupils, and stimulating the digestion. It
takes care of what the body needs when it is off-duty from fighting for
survival. {I can stop running from that tiger now, so it's time to eat.)
The two pieces seem to drive the body in opposite directions. We
hope the body can keep the system in balance and not let one or the other
run amuck.
The autonomic nervous system sends a constant stream of
information to the hypothalamus {another piece in the brain). The
hypothalamus has an important job - regulation {There is always a limit
switch somewhere) - to maintain the status quo. It controls an amazing
variety of things. It gathers data from all over the body and then sends
back signals to compensate for anything out of whack. It soaks up
information from that autonomic nervous system, reads body temperature,
checks your balance, blood pressure, visual cues, blood sugar levels,
chemical levels, and memories. It gathers signals from the outside through
the five senses {Ouch, that's hot! Yuk! Bad smell)', each sense having its
special area in the brain; for example, visual data to the occipital cortex,
tactile to the sensory cortex, auditory to the middle temporal gyrus, and
olfactory to the orbitofrontal cortex.
The hypothalamus also integrates all this information and sends
back messages to the body {squint to reduce excess light hitting the
eyeball, etc.). Messages also go back to the autonomic nervous system. A
lot of information goes through the endocrine system as well (including
the pituitary gland - a major piece of the endocrine system). This gland is
no larger than a pea and controls all the other parts of the endocrine
system. It produces all kinds of hormones. More about the stress hormone
later.
Washington Academy of Sciences
7
A Light-Hearted Look at the Brain
So where are we? Let the autonomic part continue to do its thing,
and let’s leap into the entire brain. The brain has a basic structure to it.
Actually we have three brains in one. Brain 1 is in the center called
the “R complex” (R stands for reptilian because it is very similar to the
brains of reptiles). Brain 2 is wrapped around Brain 1, called the “limbic
system” or “old mammalian brain.” Limbus is the Latin word for arc or
girdle. Brain 2 is shell-like or girdle shaped. Brain 3 is the outside surface,
the neocortex, and this is the evolutionary modem part of our brain.
Let’s look top down on the brain. All we see from this view is
Brain 3 - the neocortex. On the top is the cerebrum divided down the
middle from the front to the back into the left and right cerebral
hemispheres. When you hear about that left brain/right brain thinking, they
are talking about these hemispheres. The brain also has a side-to-side
division towards its back end, although this one is not as distinct as the
other one. In front of this side-to-side division are the frontal lobes (one
left and one right naturally because of those hemispheres).
At the back end of this
side-to-side division are the
parietal temporal, and occipital
lobes. If we peer sideways at the
brain, under that cerebmm, there
are more parts. Tucked under
there is the cerebellum. Inside
cerebrum
frontal
lobe
those other
lobes
Wcerebellum
the middle of all this are the pons and
the medulla. The brain stem comes from
the spinal cord into this region. The
thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus,
and many other things are in there. The
autonomic nervous system connects in
here. In terms of evolution, this area of
the brain is quite ancient. This makes sense too because the autonomic
system has to take care of things like breathing without our having to think
about them. All living things share this type of automatic functioning in
some manner. That blade of grass does not have to “think” itself into green
{or brown if it gets no water). Basically your conscious control tends to
happen in the cerebmm area (that is the thinking part). The automatic
Fall 2007
8
control tends to happen in the
cerebellum. The hippocampus is the
piece that handles memor\- creation and
storage. Apparently it stores memories
all over the brain.
(It finds a good spot, dumps in a
memory', sets up a database entry'
some^vhere, and mores on.)
The hippocampus is deep inside
the brain. It is a long narrow strip shaped
almost like two horseshoes. The knobs at
the end are the amygdala. The
hippocampus makes new memories. Without it you could not live in the
present, you would be smck in the past. The figure to the left is a cut away
of the brain showing the pieces important to stress.
- Prefrontal
cortex
Brain 5tr\-Cixes invoivec »n Dea inc v/rti
Fear 3rd Streis
Neurons and Neurotransmitters
All the parts communicate through an amazing network of neural
pathways: ner\*e cells strung out along axotis (the neural highway). A
ner\e cell has two things to do. One: it has to propagate any impulse
signal along the highway (keep the Traffic flow going), and two: it has to
transmit information to another ner\ e cell not on its axon (across the gap).
Impulses along an axon are electrical, mediated by sodium and
potassium ions. .\n impulse is an all or nothing proposition. It goes, or it
does not go. Electrical signals travel through the axons at quite respectable
rates, sometimes as fast as 120 meters/second (4,700 inches/secottd, about
268 miles per hour. In other words a signal makes its tnetiy' way' around
your body' ^r eiy* fast. Light itself trax els slightly less than 1,000 times
faster than that.). There are a lot of these neurons too. probably about 10^^
of them*'. Even more interesting is that these things can reconnect in new
ways, and probably do this all the time.
The other thing the neive cell does is to transmit a signal from
itself to another neuron. This involves actually a lot of chemical reactions.
These involve the neurotransmitters (XT’s). There are lots of them.
Neurons emit NT's into that gap and other neurons with compatible
receptors absorb them. (How else can the infoimation get around the
body '? If we were all one continuous neiwe cell this would be easy, but we
Washington Academy of Sdences
9
are not. Instead we are billions of these things. So the signals have to
[jump' the gap between neurons.) The signaling process, not to put too
fine a point on it, is sensitive, you see. Those neurons have to be well
tuned before they can talk properly. Drugs, disease, moods, genetics all
can affect the proper signaling of neurons. When a neural bundle in the
brain talks to another neural bundle, it uses NT’s to help the
communication (chemical reaction). It is a multi-step process.
1 . Neuron makes and stores up NT’s.
2. Neuron releases NT from a nerve terminal.
3. NT’s wanders the gap and interacts with a receptor {something
receptive in the next neuron)
4. Terminate that interaction with the receptor. (/ don 7 know why the
brain has to turn this stuff off quickly but it does.)
5. Destroy the NT or re-absorb it back into the original terminal.
NT release
terminal^
NT storing o
o
♦ o
o\
NT
receptor
NT capture
NT eject for re-uptake
NT= neurotransmitter
We can see, though, that this is a sensitive process. Lots of things
can alter it. Mess with the creation and storage. Mess with the release.
Mess with the receptor, mess with the shut off, and mess with the re-
absorption. The figure above shows two neurons with a gap between them.
One has terminals; the other has receptors. The neuron on the left has two
terminals about to release an NT; one terminal is ready to catch (re-
absorb) the NT just released by the receptor on the other neuron. There are
several wandering NT’s in the gap. The neuron on the right has receptors
receiving them quickly, closing off the receptor once it caught one, and
tossing the NT back into the fray to the terminals for re-absorption. One
terminal is ready to re-absorb the NT.
10
Two important NT’s are serotonin and dopamine. Dopamine has
many functions in the brain. Most importantly, dopamine is central to the
reward system. Low levels of dopamine may lead to depression. Serotonin
is sort of a midwife to the whole process. Serotonin wanders around in
between the bundles, in the gap there. Actually the bundles are emitting
and absorbing the serotonin all the time. They emit and reabsorb all kinds
of things. However, serotonin facilitates the communications. If there is
not enough serotonin around then the communication is faulty. A selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) is a psychiatric drug that stops the
neural bundles from re-absorbing the serotonin [inhibits the re-
absorption]. So the serotonin stays around the gap a bit longer and is there
to aid communications. Drugs like Paxil, Prozac, and Zoloft are SSRTs.
Serotonin receptors - there are 3 main types and type 1 has 4
subtypes. One subtype seems to like the hippocampus area. Another type
is found in the 4^*^ layer of the cortex, etc. Anyway, if somehow there is
not enough serotonin in that gap then the neural signaling can go awry.
Back to the autonomic nervous system that keeps the basics going
so you don’t have to think about them. We left the hypothalamus telling
you what to do. It checks the status of your body and signals changes to
keep things stable. So you shiver when you are cold, you sweat when you
are hot, and you salivate when you are hungry. These signals play a role in
your emotions. They activate that “fight-or-flight” reaction, for example.
This also includes signals to adjust the hormone levels.
Cortisol
The endocrine glands (pituitary - in the brain, and adrenal - near
the kidneys) secrete hormones. One is important to stress. It is, naturally,
the “stress hormone,” cortisol. Cortisol is a
steroid hormone that regulates blood
pressure and cardiovascular function as well
as the body’s use of proteins, carbohydrates,
and fats for energy. A body under stress
(illness, trauma, even temperature extremes)
increases cortisol production. More cortisol
means storing extra sugar for fuel, pumping
up blood pressure, increasing heart rate, etc.
All these are responses to stress. High levels
of cortisol impair verbal memory performance
Cortisol Production
Washington Academy of Sciences
11
Throughout a 24-hour day the level of cortisol in your blood
stream varies; high in the morning, low at midnight. The graph at the right
shows this variation over one day. Actually the cortisol levels are bumpy;
the smooth line is an average of the bumps.
Well, the feedback loops are looping, hormones buzzing, basics
going, and, as if it wasn’t busy enough, the brain engages in puzzles! Is it
harmful or safe? That’s a puzzle to solve. Well, let’s check the memory
banks for any background information on this, and then decide to make a
new memory, update an old one, ignore it, or take an action. The activity
level is continuous, multi-leveled, and easily disrupted. There are lots of
neurons firing, neuropeptides coming
and going, chemicals reacting, and
hormones, lots and lots of hormones.
Cognition, memory, and mood all
result from this constant activity of
electrical impulses through the
complex network of nerve cells
throughout the brain.
Cortisol molecule
Hippocampus and Amygdala
OK, loops, hormones, signals, senses, basics, puzzling. What’s
left? The solution. Something needs to make a decision. That means the
brain needs to check the databanks for past information that might help.
Enter that hippocampus. When you build or retrieve a specific memory,
the hippocampus brings together memory elements from all the sensory
areas. It stores them initially right there in its storage areas as short term
memories. When you tire of paying conscious attention to those memories,
it reorganizes them and moves them into other parts of the brain. Under
normal conditions, then, a short-term memory converts to a long-term
memory, the database entry is built, and the memory stashed away
accessible at some later time.
The amygdala gets involved in all this too. It mediates emotional
content. It is continually asking questions about current events and sensory
inputs: ‘'Is this a danger? Is this safe? Are we happy? Do I like this? Do I
need to worry? Do I need to start up the stress responses, trigger those
hormones?” It queries the hippocampus to check the database for past
instances of this event. It integrates information from internal chemistry.
O, CHjOH
Fall 2007
external events, and memories, anaches the emotions, and decides an
action.
Information arrives from the other parts of the brain: then an action
flows out. Finally a decision! ("Oh yes, this a good thing. I like french
fries." Take french fry and munch. "\ope, that's bad. I don't like bills."
Pay bill and grimace. "Ah-h, I remember that song." Gentle smile. "Ouch!
don V do thatr Bonk nose of nurse giving the shot. Well. OK. control the
bonk, but desire to bonk.)
Loops, basics, puzzling, signals, hormones, senses, database
building, database retrieval, and roila. we are ready to integrate to the
solution! The entire process goes on continuously. It is a veiy busy brain.
No wonder we get headaches!
.\nother way to look at this is to picture two systems, one hot and
one cool. The cool one is a cognitive, complex system (the thinker); the
hot one is an emotional-fear system (the trigger finger). The hippocampus
is cool. It records, in an unemotional and neutral manner, well-elaborated
autobiographical events, complete with their spatial-temporal context. It is
subject to control, (i.e., I can think
my way in and out of it. or I can
alter my interpretations and
reactions.) The amygdala is hot. It
reacts to un-integrated fragmentaiy
fear - it hooks directly to low-Ievel
fear responses. It is direct, quick,
highly emotional, and inflexible. It
keys more to instinct and is less
subject to easy control.
WTiat's normal? Both.
Eveiyone has hot and cool
memories. Your memoiy database stores it all. both the cool and the hot:
the cool system codes the context of the event: the hot system contributes
the emotional highlights of the event (specifically the ones associated with
fear). Later, a stimulus can evoke a hot memoiy and you relive the original
low-level response. A cool memoiy is narrative, recollective, and episodic
with a sense of time. You remember the event: you do not relive it or
mistake it for a current event.
WTiat happens if something interrupts or diverts all this signaling,
traffic control, and memoiy storage to the wTong place? There are many
good
Washington Academy of Sdences
13
diseases that interfere with this process. When an interruption occurs, the
signals (the NT’s) falter, leading to a failed transmission of information
from one point to another in the brain. In some cases this loss may be
inconsequential. You never notice. In other cases it may cause a massive
failure of the system: loss of memory, misperception of reality or inability
to perceive reality, or inappropriate reaction. The graph above shows what
happens to a person’s memory performance over time when there are
small and large levels of cortisol present. Clearly when the body releases a
lot of cortisol in response to stress, a person’s memory performance
degrades. A little bit seems OK, and the body does have some cortisol
present all the time.
Trauma
Trauma breaks the normal processing. Trauma is danger. The
amygdala, busy with its continual questioning, determines that danger
exists. The brain triggers the intricate fight-or-flight chemical dance to
protect itself. “Do / run away, do I fight, do 1 shut down? Whatever I do, I
am going to do it right now?'
The “hot” drive for survival takes over. The brain is now in the
middle of the dangerous event. It is not “outside” looking in at this event,
and therefore, the entire system is not easily subject to rational control.
{Fm busy, damn it. Quit bothering me with logic.) The danger response
takes several actions. Some of them are instinctual. They come with the
brain at birth, hard-wired as it were. Until the danger signal is resolved,
the hot system is in charge. The cool system is disabled or put far in the
background. (/ don 7 care how much you think about it, it ain 7 gonna
change a thing. We are taking action pal, so give it up.)
One typical hot action protects the brain through dissociation.
(Everyone dissociates at some time or other. This is quite normal and
usually benign. The stupor that comes from a long boring drive is
dissociation.) The dissociated brain stops the horror of the event before it
becomes a full real-time impossible reality. It “walls off’ the event, and in
extreme cases induces amnesia. It is a very healthy survival technique.
A danger response also sets off a cycle of stress hormones that
zoom around the body doing lots of things like raising blood sugar, blood
pressure and heart rate, and interfering with digestion. The normal process
that builds short-term memory is disrupted because the brain needs to
focus its attention on the immediate danger. {No time to store this away to
Fall 2007
14
think about later, need to save the boch' now!) The body enters a state of
hyper vigilance with an increased acoustic startle response. That particular
response is a primitive reflex to threat and is seen in animals as well as
humans.
All this is necessaiy- when the body responds to a threat. The threat
is immediate. You need to fix it now, not next week but now. This is
short-term suiwival. We don’t make it to long-term sur\ival if we don’t fix
the short-term danger. WTiat is beneficial for short-term surv ival, however,
is not necessarily good for long-term health. So one hopes the trauma or
stress is short-lived and quickly resolved. Then the brain will, after a time,
recover from the danger signal, relax the hot system and let the cool
process become more active.
Trauma Goes Over into PTSD
If the trauma is prolonged, extreme or repetitive, it can actually
physically injure the brain. The best analogy is that the amygdala stays in
the alert state so long that it gets “stuck” there. It keeps the body from
operating a healthy combination of the hot and cool systems. The neuron
pathways in the amygdala lose their “elasticity” or abilitv' to recover.
''Hey ! I am still in danger here; I need to keep the bod}' read}' to fight!
OK, hippocampus, just sto}' cool and wait over there until I get back to
you. Yo, hormones, keep ‘em coming. Nobod}' ’s messing with MY swwival.
Liver, give me more sugar for energy', adrenals stay' with me now.'" WTioa.
You can see what happens. The body depletes its resources.
Remember the cool system is the one that puts things in time order
in the database. {So you don V confuse today' with five years ago.) Since the
cool system stays mostly “offline” or veiy^ weakly enabled during trauma,
it fails to put the right time stamp on all this activity', and so the real time
trauma events stay as fragmented disconnected memoiv' bits. With
fragmented memory bits, the memory' database is corrupt and has gaps.
But the body keeps sensing danger and sending out stress response signals.
The person keeps living “in the moment.” If this goes on long enough or is
severe enough, the person develops PTSD. Long after the original trauma
ends, the person suffers from the symptoms. He or she lives and responds
to “now” even though “now” may be a memory' fragment from long ago.
He or she cannot separate “now and safe” from “now and danger.”
The longer the vigilant state lasts the higher the chances of
permanent damage. The cool hippocampus cannot get to the long-term
Washington Academy of Sdences
15
memories. The amygdala keeps shutting them down. Without the ability to
access the cool, cognitive solutions, the PTSD sufferer is unable to check
the safety of a current event, cannot distinguish danger from safety.
Current, safe events trigger flashbacks and other strange memory or
emotional signals. So the brain keeps retriggering itself all over again into
the hyper-alert state. Each new challenge and event is as dangerous as the
last. This phenomenon is sometimes known as sensitization.
The injury is real. The injury is physical. It is not mere confusion
or misdirected thinking, or sign of a weak character. It most certainly is
not a case of “just get over it.”
There is a special and sad vulnerability for children. During early
development, the brain enters a hyper-alert phase as part of the learning
and growing process. Children absorb an amazing of information in a
short time. They learn walking, talking, communication, and how to
control information. Children learn the difference between their actions
and themselves. They learn to separate themselves from their
environment. They build their identites. One pictures that alert little
amygdala busy processing all that new information from the world, storing
up experiences, defining rules, figuring out language and the power of
words {that ’s the terrible twos.), figuring out society, and ''look! See what
happens when 1 drop the ball - it falls to the floor and makes a noise and
rolls away. Will it do that again? Let’s see.'' Children are wonderful
scientists and natural experimenters. It must be an exciting time for the
brain.
What if there is trauma? Trauma can push this alert state to such
extremes that there is damage to the brain cells (PTSD). If the child stays
this way for an extended time, then memories that might have become
long term (and therefore retrievable later to the adult brain) are never
connected. She loses her memory of childhood. And she never fully builds
an integrated personality. This is not necessarily a multiple personality,
although in the most extreme cases, the child can develop the Dissociative
Identity Disorder (DID) that results in multiple personalities. Some people
have improperly characterized all such injuries as DID. Far more common
than DID, however, is the injured, traumatized personality that develops
PTSD.
In the case of a young child this is especially serious. It seems as if
children are bom with a brain filled with templates, some complete, most
needing some input from the environment to complete their stmcture. The
child fills in these templates as she grows and learns human behavior. At
Fall 2007
16
some critical point the child integrates all the templates into an executive
control, an identity, a self. The safer the environment the healthier the
final product. Probably by the age of six the templates are complete
enough to define a whole person.
If the child completes the integration, then she/he can endure a lot
of physical and mental attacks and not lose their identity. She/he will
develop their own strategies for survival. If however the trauma is severe
enough, then depending upon the trauma and when it occurred, one or
more particular templates may remain incomplete; she/he does not
integrate. Sadly, they do not know this has occurred. The painful future,
the misunderstandings to come, the failures and confusions, these will all
make little sense to them. They think that their brain is operating the same
way that everyone else’s brain does. They think they have the same
genetic templates and the same completed personality. They do not
understand why they have problems.
If there is enough fear, then the brain recognizes almost all real-
time input as a threat, and if the links are weak to begin with, the child
never learns to “touch” reality.
Acknowledge, Accept, and Accommodate
Certain problems are likely to occur with PTSD. They include
panic disorder, agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety
disorder, phobias, depression, sleep disorders, and substance abuse. These
disorders sometimes precede PTSD, but may also develop after the onset
of PTSD. Other medical problems like skin problems, pain, and
gastrointestinal distress, also seem to be more likely to occur in those
suffering from PTSD. Fortunately, successful treatment of PTSD often
results in the cessation of these problems.
PTSD is real, painful, and disabling. The cost is over 44 billion
dollars a year, 23 billion in direct medical costs. Fortunately, there are
now effective treatments for PTSD. Acting early may prevent PTSD from
becoming worse and causing problems in one’s career and relationships.
PTSD is treated by a variety of forms of psychotherapy (talk therapy) and
pharmacotherapy (medication). There is no single best treatment, but some
treatments appear to be quite promising, especially cognitive-behavioral
therapy (CBT). CBT includes a number of diverse but related techniques
such as cognitive restructuring, exposure therapy, and eye movement
Washington Academy of Sciences
17
desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Treatment can last from
months to years.
If you know someone who suffers from PTSD, what do you do?
Remember that your meta-language (body language) conveys 90% of your
message. Your words convey only 10% of your message. Convey positive
messages, not degrading ones. For example, in the workplace the
following are not good for anyone but disastrous for someone suffering
from PTSD: unstable physical environment, hostile environment, long
work hours, and stress. In handling PTSD as in handling any disability,
acknowledge, accept, and accommodate.
There are a large number of useful web sites on PTSD. Two of them are:
http://www.ncptsd.va.gov/ncmain/index.jsp is the Department of
Veteran’s Affairs National Center for PTSD and
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/HealthInformation/ptsdmenu.cfm is the National
Institutes of Health site for PTSD. Both have lots of useful information.
Endnotes
* Monomania is a type of paranoia in which the patient has only one idea
or type of ideas
" In the past, the term was most commonly used to refer to “General
paresis,” which was a symptom of untreated syphilis.
A dipsomaniac is a person with an uncontrollable craving for alcohol. It
differs from alcoholism in that it is an uncontrollable periodic lust for
alcohol, with, in the interim, no desire for alcoholic beverages.
Dipsomania is a dated term.
As a comparison, there are about 10^’ stars in our Galaxy.
Fall 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
19
A THEORY OF PERSONAL DRIVE SATISFACTION
STRATEGIES AND THE CULTURE THEY GENERATE
Thomas Meylan
EvolvingSuccess®
Burtonsville, Md.
Abstract
Utilizing concepts derived from the field of evolutionary psychology,
two forms of collective behavior in human populations are explored.
Collective behavior (or group behavior, or team behavior, or communal
behavior) is examined as an outgrowth of individual Drive Satisfaction
Strategies. The presumption is that the most important element(s) in an
individual human being’s natural environment is now the artificial
social context within which one lives, and the people of whom these
social contexts are composed. This implies that for a human organism
to play the game of natural selection effectively, that organism will
need new clusters of behaviors that allow it to obtain needed resources
and avoid different types of dangers in this natural environment of new
and rapidly evolving social contexts. A Drive Satisfaction Strategy
(DSS) provides these clusters of behaviors. For human organisms there
are two types of DSSs. There are Competitive DSSs, and there are
Collaborative DSSs. There are two Competitive DSSs: Alpha Climbing
(the offensive strategy) and Status Quo Preserving (the defensive
strategy). There are two Collaborative DSSs: Leading (the strategic,
community-forming strategy) and Contributing (the tactical, solution-
forming strategy). The nature of the collective behavior is determined
by the types of DSSs most commonly at play in any given population.
If this collective behavior starts to exhibit habits practiced widely
among the population, we call those habits the culture of the group.
Introduction
Natural selection is not, as near as can be told, a social
phenomenon. However, it is clear that natural selection “conducts
experiments” with various forms of collective behavior, with examples
that include insect colonies and hives, fish schooling, pack hunting and
other herd behavior, as well as the various forms of social structure
exhibited by assorted great ape and human populations. What is it about
Fall 2007
20
collective behavior that could provide an individual organism advantages
as it plays out the game of natural selection? Some examples are
• The brute-force ability to do things as a group that individuals
alone simply couldn’t do.
• The classic “safety in numbers.”
• Greater group efficiency through behavior specialization
distributed across the group (as observed in ants and bees).
For animals, collective behaviors have to serve what we have
called Drive Satisfaction Strategies (DSS). Most animals operate on the
basis of one or, at most, two pre-wired {i.e., instinctive) DSSs to succeed
in the struggle of natural selection. These DSSs define a wide range of
pre-programmed behavioral responses to a pre-supposed set of
environmental conditions. Some instincts are open to a bit of modification,
and many are not.
It appears that human beings have the option of utilizing as many
as four DSSs, two of which actually supply an individual the ability to
design new behavioral responses. Perhaps more significantly, because of a
relative lack of instinctive behavioral presets, human beings are not locked
into environment-specific approaches to life. If an individual is placed in a
strange environment, he or she can usually find a means for coping with,
and eventually even thriving in, the new conditions. These two DSSs in
human beings that deliver behavior-design capabilities also deliver the
capabilities for designing collective behavior strategies.
Drive Satisfaction Strategies
Based on our readings in primate social behavior, combined with
our experience dealing with groups of business leaders and creative
working teams, we found it convenient to define a concept of the Drive
Satisfaction Strategy, or DSS for short. For great apes and humans, we
view these strategies as a locus of mental activity that establishes
individual drive priorities and the execution of behaviors to meet those
priorities. For convenience, here are the three primary drives that allow an
individual animal to play the game of natural selection most effectively
(see Meylan 2005^ for the derivation of these drives):
Washington Academy of Sciences
21
• The drive to eliminate or avoid all forms of pain or discomfort.
• The drive to have sex.
• The drive to nurture offspring to self-sufficiency in the shortest
time possible.
The degree to which an animal’s behavior complies with these
drives (better than some other competitor in the environment) determines
its chances of transmitting those relative advantages to the next
generation. Social structure in human populations merely constitutes
another set of environmental conditions that have to be handled
successfully. These conditions can be handled in terms of winning the
game of natural selection, or conversely, in terms of personal human
gratification (especially in those cases when an individual has opted out of
the game of natural selection, such as those who practice birth control, or
as in the gay populations).
Culture
There have been many definitions of culture offered, each of which
certainly meets the needs of various students and investigators. Since our
ultimate aim with these studies is the formation of training applications to
improve leadership and the productivity of organizations, we have defined
culture in a specific way that lends itself to objective investigation. We
have also insisted that the definition pertains to observable human
behavior, because regardless of the motivations of people to act, all we
have sure access to is the record of their actual behaviors. With these
requirements in mind, we define culture for any given group in the
following way:
Culture is the complete collection of behavioral habits exhibited by
a group of human beings.
How the group is defined is dependent on the aspects of group
behavior one wishes to study. We usually study the culture of businesses,
since we’re interested in the behaviors that produce a business’s value (or
habitually detract from it, as the case may be). A lot of social science is
done on groups defined by their ethnic characteristics. Problems in culture
studies arise when a person wishing to understand one group over-
generalizes categories of behavior from some other group... usually “their
own.”
Fall 2007
For a varier\- of reasons, these over-generalizations are difficult to
avoid. One reason is that we actually seek to generalize from panicular
cases to larger classes of phenomena. That's a primaiy aim of science.
Over-generalization means we've insisted on mapping our findings to
cases that simply don't fit them. W’e will tiy not to do this anyway.
Positions "'At the Top ”
Smdies in groups and culmres often, if not always, attempt to
determine how the hierarchy in a group forms. Specific attention is given
to leadership roles. A common flaw in smdies such as these is the
assumption that the person at the top of the hierarchy is “the leader." In
watching business people at close range for some decades, obseivations
suggest that few groups have leaders in top positions. ^Mlat appears to be
the case most often is that the person “at the top" is merely the top
competitor in the group. Leadership may be of secondaiy interest to the
person at the top. but the chances of that being the case are slim: being top
competitor may be the only interest of that person.
We have defmed two DSSs that motivate people into positions at
the top. One is called Alpha Climbing. This occurs when an individual is
attempting to acquire a place in the social strucmre that delivers the
resources he or she wants for the level of efifon they're willing to exert. If
they exert enough effort they can get the top spot. The second DSS driving
people to the top is called Leading. This occurs when an individual is able
to coordinate group behavior in a way that delivers greater resource payoff
than working alone could for similar levels of effort.
The prevalence of people operating under either of these strategies
affects the rtpe of culture that forms in a given group. Groups dominated
by Alpha Climbers will succeed or fail based primarily on the strengths
and weaknesses of the climbers. Groups dominated by Leaders will
succeed or fail based on the abilit>' of the leaders to coordinate the
strengths and weaknesses of group members to accomplish “bigger
things.*'
Wj‘apping up the Introduction
The thoughts and behaviors of human beings are generated by a set
of habits we are calling a Drive Satisfaction Strateg>’. All animals have
them: most animals' DSSs are more heavily pre-coded than those of a
human being. Human DSSs tend to optimize the combination of habimal
Washington Academy of Sdences
23
behavior (to save time in survival emergencies) and new learning (to adapt
quickly to unfamiliar environmental circumstances).
When a group of human beings gets together, their DSSs often
cause them to compete and conflict with each other. There are notable
exceptions to this general rule, however. Sometimes individuals recognize
important skills in each other that make certain tasks easier to accomplish,
or perhaps even make things impossible for individuals to do possible as a
group.
Methodology
There is a certain compulsion to be defensive when you strike out
on your own in a given field of study, as we are doing here. With little to
build on from other investigators, we are limited to extensive years of
experience as data, and a relatively new paradigm for understanding
human thought and behavior as an interpretive tool. However, training
seminars we have designed based upon this approach are proving effective
for most of the knowledge-based industries where they have been
presented.
In a previous paper we spent some time justifying the validity of
this work, and those who wish to see the fuller treatment may read it in
Meylan 2007^. The main points are distilled below.
• Evolutionary psychology (ev psych) literature has jumped from
building its own discipline to attempting answers for other
disciplines before it’s ready to generalize at that level.
• Previous attempts to integrate ev psych and industrial psych do not
exist.
• We are doing “rough science” from field observations.
• We assert evolution/natural selection as primarily a macro-scopic
phenomenon (as opposed to a genetically-driven micro-scopic
phenomenon).
• Observations on human work behaviors have been collected by
three people, over 100 years combined observations, including
over 50 years in management/leadership roles in a variety of
industries.
Fall 2007
24
• Long term observations have been combined with simple ev psych
principles to reverse engineer human thought and behavior to
obtain a system level model.
• More detailed analysis of external and internal sensing systems in
the human body and their effects on workplace emotional states
has been conducted using interpretive tools based in ev psych.
In this presentation we are extending previous work to understand
how the Drive Satisfaction Strategies of individuals produce interactions
among people to generate the habits of collective, group behavior. In most
animal existence individuals of any given species have to compete against
the environment, against other animals in the niche, and even against other
members of their own species. In a few cases, noted above, competition
instinctively gives way to various forms of collaborative behavior.
Humans, on the other hand, appear to make specific choices about
competing or collaborating, depending on specific factors such as payoff
for level of effort or previous success in working with known members of
earlier teams.
Drive Satisfaction Strategies in Detail
Unlike most animal species, environmental effects on human
beings are dominated by the presence of others of their own kind. Human
drive satisfaction almost always takes place in the context of an
association of people, or (more likely among North American knowledge
workers) networks of associations of people. Groups of people are the
most important features, and significant natural elements, in human
environments.
This suggests that much human thought and behavior is going to
be expended on the manipulation and management of other human beings
in the environment. As the human race moves from individual struggles
with the environment to labor specialization leading to the trade of goods
and services, individuals’ efforts in drawing resources directly from
Nature decrease while efforts in drawing resources from other human
beings increase. Individual skills in hunting or gathering are supplemented
(or eventually replaced) by interpersonal skills that allow people with a
surplus of “whatever” to acquire what they lack from another person with
a different surplus.
Washington Academy of Sciences
25
At a point in natural history when virtually all resources have to be
acquired from an individual or organization, human DSSs become a
collection of skills and habits specifically suited to social interactions,
with abilities to draw drive satisfaction from unaltered natural resources
greatly atrophied or entirely lost. And even for those who still can farm, or
hunt, or make tools by hand, they have to have a community with which
they can trade to obtain their other needs. So the preponderance of drive
satisfaction skills must be interpersonal and social for human beings to
operate at their peak.
Drive Satisfaction Strategies, and the Mental Subsystems
that Support Them
In a previous paper (Meylan 2005^), we applied evolutionary
psychology and the information science technique of reverse engineering
to parse out the way human information processing might actually work,
from a systems engineering point of view. Of the four subsystems that
exercise identified, two of them strongly influence the nature of DSSs in
the social contexts we’ve outlined above. The older of these (from a
natural history point of view) is what we called the system of environment
condition assessments, which we experience most often as our emotions.
The more recent of the two we called the problem-solving system with its
extensive input/output subsystems. Each of these two information
processing systems in human beings supports a separate class of DSSs.
The system of environment condition assessments supports Competitive
DSSs, while the problem-solving system can support Collaborative DSSs.
There is frequently confusion about the relative moral distinctions
between competition and collaboration. It is often said that people who
compete are usually nasty, while people who collaborate are usually nicer.
This distinction must be discarded. While it may be true from a certain
point of view, the fact is that a DSS is always a self-serving approach to
daily existence. Everyone wants to avoid or eliminate all forms of pain or
discomfort in their lives. Everyone at times competes to accomplish this;
at other times people will collaborate. The context (including personal
history) guides the choice.
In these two classes of DSSs we have identified two DSSs per
class. In each class there is a DSS which can move people toward
positions “at the top,” and a DSS in each class that allows a person to
Fall 2007
26
maintain a stable and suitable location lower in the social structure. That’s
a total of only four DSSs we’ve uncovered for functioning in
environments where social interaction is required for survival. The Figure
below provides a schematic relationship among these four DSSs with
scales that may be useful in quantifying their significance for a given
individual in a given place and time.
Competitive Drive Satisfaction Strategies
The DSSs on the left half of the Figure are the Competitive DSSs,
Alpha Climbing and Status Quo Preserving. As noted above, these are
supported largely by the system that produces our experience of emotions.
This system is the current “end-product” of a very old mammalian
approach to drive satisfaction. It presumes under most circumstances that
there will be no assistance from any part of the environment to achieve
drive satisfaction. This presumption therefore provides the basis for
competitive DSSs in humans as well.
In the competitive mode an individual swings between Alpha
Climbing and Status Quo Preserving depending on opportunity, need, and
level of effort to acquire a drive-satisfying resource or otherwise eliminate
a discomfort. All humans start out as climbers in a human society, and
then switch to preserving their position when they’ve attained a place
where opportunity, need, and effort are balanced against the level of drive
satisfaction they have achieved. Even the person who succeeds at climbing
all the way “to the top” switches to the defensive. Status Quo Preserving
DSS to retain that top spot as long as possible.
Based as they are on ancient, mammalian wiring, competitive
DSSs will manifest emotional barriers to behaviors of the following kind:
• Leading (in the human, social sense)
• Following (also in the human, social sense)
• Delegating important tasks
• Following up on delegated tasks
• Seeking drive satisfaction solutions requiring help or assistance
• Trusting
Washington Academy of Sciences
27
Competitive, Solo Approach
Collaborative, Team Approach
(D
<1^ -d
tL .3?
° "I
IS-
dll
Si^ ^
p >1
■E tn CO
QI 0 ^
.lie
•S -o o
«
o. (0 0
E tn 01
o 9- c
O o g
c -c
- CO 5
CO w
Q .E
g’o
•=
O
cB
_
5 2.
0 N
cr 91
5S Q-
^0-
a o
§ §■ “
g; 0 <■
Z] X
0 :3
ilS
0 o p-
'"0 0
o 5
cj- 0
^ -o
Q. 0
§ B
P §
$
Emotion Driven; Stability via Defense Rational Driven; Stability via Offense
People’s DSSs continuously shift on the basis of opportunity, threat, and need.
All people work toward stability in their living and working conditions.
In other words, most of the behaviors that make a civilized society
work are emotionally unnatural for human beings to execute. They create
various forms of emotional stress for individuals who attempt them. We
have observed this frequently in work places, where people “in charge”
often take “the lazy” or “the safe” path relative to employee interactions,
and where employees say they’ll undertake something but don’t follow
through. In a social setting populated by people executing competitive
DSSs, everyone remains a “lone wolf’ from a social and functional point
of view.
The strength of these emotional barriers against collectively
constructive behavior cannot be overstated. It is a basic part of human
physiology designed for success in a non-social or pre-social species. The
only thing that overcomes these natural emotional barriers is repeated
collaborative drive satisfaction success with other individuals. However,
once collaboration is over, or worse, when a former drive satisfaction
collaborator disappoints, the pre-wired emotional barriers go back up.
Fall 2007
28
Collaborative Drive Satisfaction Strategies
On the right half of the Figure are the collaborative DSSs, Leading
and Contributing. Leading and Contributing are only needed when tactics
requiring multiple human participants produce superior drive satisfaction
than working alone will. If the level of effort to participate in group drive
satisfaction is higher than the perceived value of the potential payoff,
people will be “disinclined” to participate.
The preceding paragraph implies two things: first, that human
beings are capable of deriving drive satisfaction tactics and solutions apart
from pre-wired motivations to act certain ways under certain conditions
and second, that individuals can evaluate the relative merits of one course
of action over another. These two implications are huge departures from
standard animal approaches to drive satisfaction. Collaborative DSSs are
solution oriented, not instinct based.
This implies, further, that individuals can approach drive
satisfaction either with a solution orientation, or with an emotion-laden
instinctive approach, whether or not a group is involved. In other words,
one can observe people who approach life as a series of solutions to be
worked out, and other people who approach life as an interpersonal
struggle to acquire and maintain status (not necessarily always high status
as much as a reliable status for acquiring life’s necessities). This has
tremendous implications for hiring, for example. Further, as the Figure
suggests, the mix of DSSs that any given individual uses at any given time
is likely to change as opportunity, threat, and need change. For example, a
hard-charging, “take-no-prisoners” Alpha Climber might also be quite
good and building effective, short-term teams to suit specific purposes to
gain tactical advantages over other climbers.
People working in the collaborative mode are attempting to build
effective, and usually superior, solutions out of sub-standard conditions.
Or if the conditions are actually good, it still requires the effective
coordination of a team to take advantage of them. In more primitive
situations, people can watch the team to see if they are effective or not. It
behooves individuals to find a way to associate with an effective team if it
increases their individual abilities to satisfy drives. Conversely, if a group
can’t produce, there’s no need to bother with it.
“Everybody loves a winner.”
Washington Academy of Sciences
29
The Competitive Strategy of Alpha Climbing
Let’s now consider each specific DSS in turn.
Some species form colonies, packs, or troops that facilitate Drive
Satisfaction Strategies for the individuals that belong to them. In some of
these species there is a place of privilege in these groups where an
individual with qualifying characteristics either gets special treatment
from other members of the group, special access to resources, or both. The
terms “queen bee” and “alpha male” have come to signify this place of
privilege. Association with individuals in top positions also confers
special treatments. Primate studies, for instance, make it clear that females
also can obtain a place of privilege in the group when they are associated
with the alpha male.
The set of behaviors that brings an individual to alpha status is
termed the Alpha Climbing Drive Satisfaction Strategy. The whole point
of the climb is to improve treatment by the group or obtain better access to
resources.
When it comes to achieving true Alpha status in a primate group
there are usually a number of individuals competing to take it. This is the
most commonly “discussed” meaning of Alpha Climbing. However, the
fact of the matter is that everyone attempts the climbing competition. Most
participants, though, find the competition too demanding, and they settle
for a lesser position in the group. The important thing about this is that
this lesser preferred position still satisfies the “quitter’s” drives. They
climbed to the point where the drive satisfaction payoff was adequate for
the level of effort involved to acquire needed resources.
People utilizing the Alpha Climbing DSS often exhibit
characteristics such as the following:
• Climb to acquire more resources
• Consider most people as opponents
• View rules as something to control for advantage
• Mistrust communication among parties
• Keep agreements when convenient
The Competitive Strategy of Status Quo Preserving
If you’re not playing offence to earn Alpha status or climb to some
acceptable level, then you’re playing defense. Defense is an important
Fall 2007
1
30
competitive strategy. Even individuals who have topped out at the Alpha
position have to play defense to retain the title.
Every individual in a primate group who stops climbing starts to
defend the position of status and access to resources that they have
attained. This is the Status Quo Preserving Drive Satisfaction Strategy.
Under most conditions this strategy is implemented not only with
preserving access to status and resources in mind, but also to reduce the
level of effort needed to keep an effective defense against threats or
challenges. It is usually a “least level of effort” approach to drive
satisfaction maintenance.
People utilizing the Status Quo Preserving DSS often exhibit
characteristics such as the following:
• Desire to preserve availability of resources
• Consider most people as potential threats
• View rules as preserving the good
• Avoid communication where possible
• Avoid agreements where possible
The Collaborative Strategy of Leading
As an individual transitions from emotion-based competitive
strategies, it becomes increasingly important to operate on the basis of
solutions to problems. In human beings this is implemented as a symbol-
driven method for modeling local conditions along with the threats and
opportunities those conditions can generate. Further, this modeling
capability is not limited to assessments and plans for handling natural
conditions. It is also useful for modeling social conditions, and how they
can be used constructively to formulate solutions for improving the yield
of drive satisfaction activities.
There are times when a person can formulate a drive satisfaction
solution by using a team that delivers a payoff that would be greater than
if they all expended the same level of effort as separate individuals. In
fact, some of these solutions might not even be possible to execute without
a team. People who implement drives satisfaction solutions of this kind
are utilizing the Leading Drive Satisfaction Strategy. Leaders define the
opportunity or threat, draft a plan of action, organize personnel and
materiel, and set out to deliver the drive satisfaction solution with the team
fully engaged to work.
Washington Academy of Sciences
31
Leaders are able to formulate solutions through symbol-driven,
rational processes that will be very effective yet emotionally
uncomfortable to implement. Why is this? This is because collaborative
solutions require levels of trust that are not part of the emotional
programming of animals, including human beings. Therefore, Leaders not
only have to (more or less rationally) identify the issue and compose a
solution, but they also have to overcome millions of years of naturally-
selected emotional baggage to form a team that will stick together long
enough to give Leaders and their proposed solutions a real try. This means
that there are times when Leaders have to be able to formulate effective
emotional appeals to a population, and sell or motivate some members on
the merits of a given plan of action in order to form the team or group.
People utilizing the Leading DSS often exhibit characteristics such
as the following:
• View resources as “leveragable”
• Consider people as partners in a mutual venture
• View rules as something to be discovered for each context
• Encourage wide networks of communication
• Renegotiate agreements as needed.
The Collaborative Strategy of Contributing
When people believe that they can leverage their efforts and the
energy they expend on drive satisfaction by collaborating with a group,
they are likely to utilize the Contributing Drive Satisfaction Strategy.
They recognize that their drive satisfaction payoff will go up while
operating with the group when compared to their operating alone.
What distinguishes this DSS from Status Quo Preserving?
Primarily, Contributors are looking for places to leverage their skills in a
group context. Instead of taking a defensive posture relative to their access
to resources. Contributors know they have skills that can be combined
with others to produce that higher drive satisfaction payoff They perhaps
can’t, or don’t wish to. Lead, but they have a clear sense about the benefits
of joining the right group, or following the right Leader.
People utilizing the Contributing DSS often exhibit characteristics
such as the following:
Fall 2007
i
32
• View resources as a shared commodity
• Consider people as potential team mates
• View rules as helpful guides
• Feel free to communicate as situations warrant
• Trust people to keep agreements in the same manner that they will.
One Human Being Using Any of Four DSSs as Needed
While we have defined four clearly distinguishable DSSs falling
under the two categories of “Competitive” and “Collaborative,” we have
also shown that people switch DSSs based on their local conditions. We
have also implied that individuals can combine them, such as when a top-
level Alpha Climber builds teams to facilitate a specific part of his or her
climb. The point is that we are not likely to find “true types” where people
only make use of one DSS at a time, or only one for their entire lifetime.
We can say, however, that at any given point in time we ought to be able
to identify the DSS that dominates any given individual’s behavior under
a given set of circumstances. It is usually on that basis that we interact
with people. It is also on that basis that we build managerial strategies
when leading groups of people.
Competitive Cultures vs. Collaborative Cultures
Let’s begin by reiterating our definition of culture:
Culture is the complete collection of behavioral habits exhibited by
a group of human beings.
The fraction of people within a group who share a given habit
determine that behavior’s strength as an element of the group’s culture.
Consider a group comprised of 100 members. A behavior unique to one
group member, or perhaps shared by one or two others, might not be
thought of as an element of the group’s culture. Conversely, a habit shared
by 90 or more members of the group could be thought of as an important
cultural element, regardless of how trivial the behavior might seem on the
surface.
Competitive Cultures
While there are many who believe themselves to be “above”
competing with their fellow human being, common observation makes it
clear that everyone does. The competitive behaviors might be guided by
Washington Academy of Sciences
33
polite custom. They might be slow and undramatic. They might be rude
and churlish, as in the way high school women create their pecking orders.
The point is that human animals are emotionally geared for competition
just like all the rest of the large mammals on the planet. At this point the
human race does NOT constitute a special case.
What might make the human case special, but not unique, is that
the competitive environment INCLUDES competition with members of
one’s own species, and not just competition against the environment in
general, or against competing species in the same niche. It is this backdrop
of “in-group” competition that structures the foundations of all human
cultures.
Why is this so? This is because the members of the group
themselves ARE, or STRONGLY REPRESENT, the resources required
for drive satisfaction. If I make great stone tools, and you need them to be
the most successful hunter in the village, we’ll cut deals that will feed us
and our families more often than those who don’t have such skills to apply
to their DSSs. Too bad about the other village members who can’t “play at
our level.”
On the other hand. . .what just happened in that last paragraph?
Collaborative Cultures
I might like to make stone tools. I hate hunting, but I’m good
enough to do it if I have to. On the other hand, you might like the thrill of
the hunt, and just plain HATE sitting around and taking little chips out of
stones to make them extremely sharp. But if we can figure out how to do
it, we both could eat better if we each simply do what we like to do best.
So we collaborate; I supply hunting tools in exchange for fresh meat. You
can kill more animals more quickly than others, so you have a surplus to
trade with others in the village. The collaboration is a much more efficient
use of both of our drives satisfaction efforts.
On the other hand, it’s still a dog-eat-dog world out there. Maybe
other hunters want to use my products, so I cut collaborative deals with
them. That also gives me higher status as a climber in the village, a
competitive DSS. If that undercuts your monopoly on fresh meat, you get
mad and kill me, exercising the status quo preserving DSS. Now we all
lose because fierce greed, as displayed by the climb of the tool maker, or
Fall 2007
34
as displayed by the emotional fear of losing the top spot by the hunter,
destroyed the superior, rational solution created by working together.
Pockets of collaborative culture spring up for similar reasons today
and often shatter just as quickly because of the same emotional responses
that engender competition. People in successful pockets of collaboration
forget the rational, solution-oriented basis that gave them drive
satisfaction advantages, or in our modem times, business advantages.
These short scenarios illustrate some cmcial things about
collaborative cultures:
1. People creating a collaborative culture come together b.ecause
the solutions they can implement as a group for drive satisfaction
are superior to acting alone, or to competing with one another.
2. Whether consciously thought out or not, collaborative cultures
are rooted in rational, solution-building processes that produce
superior drive satisfaction results.
3. However, these cultures also often create social conditions that
are frequently at odds with our basic emotional makeup,
inherited from our large mammal ancestors.
4. If the success of the group generates strong emotions leading to
climbing or status quo preserving, the collaborative culture will
break down and the group members will revert back to wide
spread utilization of competitive DSSs.
5. This suggests that collaborative groups with the best insight into
human nature, and foresight to prevent the effects of emotion-
driven competition from destroying a successful group, will
establish mles for defining behavioral boundaries in order to
preserve the drive satisfaction advantages produced by the group.
Now, let’s continue our little pre-historic story a little longer.
When the village across the valley heard that these people had killed their
main weapons maker, they came storming down the valley, killed all the
males at our first village, and took all the females as sex slaves (can’t say
breeding stock: they probably didn’t know what sex REALLY does at that
point in time). This represents a serious loss in drive satisfaction
capabilities for our first village, doesn’t it? Especially, oddly enough, in
the areas of competitive advantage. This suggests a sixth point, namely
Washington Academy of Sciences
35
6. In group-to-group competitive contexts, the group with the
most solution-oriented, innovative, and “self-sustaining” (in
terms of cohesion, resilience, and dedication to culture
preservation) collaborative culture is more likely to win.
It is through this type of argument that we ascribe evolutionary
advantages, as defined in the elassic theory of natural selection, to
collaborative cultures. Let’s look at a few properties observable in human
culture that are possible outcomes of Points 5 and 6.
Enforced Social ''Semi-collaboration ''
To begin with, despite the long-term tradition to the contrary, we
need to avoid the view that for the most part we live in artificial
environments. By analogy, if we think of wave action as a natural force re-
arranging the material along beaches, or if we think of ground water as a
natural foree re-arranging material underground to form caves, we can
think of the actions of human beings as a natural foree that also re-
arranges materials. In so doing, environments ean be ereated that make
drives satisfaction activities more efficient.
But what happens if these environments become more dangerous
than undeveloped regions of land? What happens when the natural force
of human aetion becomes great enough to threaten drive satisfaction
activities? What happens if collections of human beings prey on each
other with greater efficiency than they could if they lived in smaller, less
successful groups (such as other great apes do)? If communal living is
dominated by competition, then the group is merely a stockpile of
resources for the top competitors. On the other hand, if communal living is
dominated by collaboration, the force of humanity on nature can become
great enough to modify it in bigger and better ways for human drive
satisfaetion aetivities.
Yet we know that climbing is a pervasive and often dangerous
activity. We know that we have to defend our accrued resources against
criminal invasion and theft. Just because we all can intellectual affirm,
“Yes, collaboration is the way human communities should operate,” we
know that the pre-wired emotions we retain from our evolutionary past
cause large numbers of people to act in self-interested ways that are a
detriment to society as a whole, to members of their own group, and
Fall 2007
36
therefore, ultimately, a detriment to the achievement of even greater
personal goals.
This emotion-based, blind self-interest is what reduces the
efficiency of communal living, sometimes to the point where leaving a
group that is dysfunctional for drive satisfaction is the only course left for
individuals to take. What can a group do to prevent people from seeking
communities that serve their drive satisfaction needs more effectively?
While there is a whole spectrum of possibilities, let’s define just
two broad classes of things that groups have done. At the lowest level,
they’ve established rules to prevent infringements on people’s freedom to
act out their DSSs, and to preserve the resources they’ve acquired through
those activities. Early ancient legal codes prescribe various forms of
“personal non-interference” ranging from the acquisition of mates to
leaving other people’s property (including mates) alone, to public health
practices.
These are minimal efforts at “enforced semi-collaboration.” They
are in place merely to keep large numbers of human competitors from
preying on each other, especially in environments where other groups are
part of the regional competitive landscape. Social behaviors that weaken
your group’s ability to respond to challenges from other groups in your
region reduce the drive satisfaction capabilities of your group. Groups
have defined criminal law, civil law, religious law, moral codes, and other
mechanisms to keep human beings from preying on each other within
groups and increasingly dense urban populations. The large body of
contract law that has evolved over centuries also serves to enforce
collaboration in the face of parties who may frequently find reasons to
break agreements when advantages to do so become apparent.
Social-level ''Intentional Collaboration ”
The second broad class of approaches in large scale collaboration
has fewer examples of note, but this is perhaps understood by the nature of
collaborative strategies: they are situational. Whereas enforced
collaboration in the sense defined above is a continuous need for social
cohesion, “intentional collaboration” requires in the least a vision of the
upside potential of working together to achieve greater “per unit outpuf ’
from drive satisfaction activities. At this point we begin to see the
appearance of various requisite leadership skills.
Washington Academy of Sciences
37
As it happens, most groups that form to improve the efficiency of
their drives satisfaction activities also include safeguards against
counterproductive competitive behavior on the part of group members.
The skilled trade unions of medieval Europe, as well as the agreements of
the Hanseatic League of northern Europe provide some examples.
The US Declaration of Independence and US Constitution are
explicitly “intentionally collaborative” in the sense that they ground the
intentions of the nation as supporting “life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness” and providing a legal framework for developing a complete
continent. While they also establish the means to keep civil peace, they
take a much more positive stance on the opportunities available to
common citizens living within the jurisdiction of the US.
There are groups as well, which are almost completely supportive
of the drive satisfaction activities of their members. In modem business,
the Fortune 100 Best Places to Work exhibits companies who take the
personal drive satisfaction activities of their employees very seriously by
facilitating their personal DSSs in a variety of ways appropriate for
modem worker lifestyles. Best Places to Work reap a much greater return
on investment (ROI) for their labor dollars by engendering a drive-based
level of tmst between company and employee.
Conclusions
Evolutionary psychology can be utilized to link the requirements
of individual success in the game of natural selection to various forms of
collective behavior exhibited by some species. We have focused, for
practical reasons, on the collective behaviors of human beings.
The behaviors of individual human beings must deliver certain
levels of success in terms of reproductive success. Cmdely speaking, this
means living long enough to have lots of kids, mating often enough to
create lots of kids, and training as many kids as possible to be successful
adults in as short of a time as possible. We have identified four Drive
Satisfaction Strategies, split between the Competitive and Collaborative
classes of DSSs, which allow individuals to build successful sets of
behaviors relative to the principles of natural selection.
These two classes of DSSs function in the formation of two
distinct types of human cultures, those being, obviously. Competitive
Cultures, and Collaborative Cultures. The default human culture is
Fall 2007
38
Competitive. This is because human thought and behavior is dominated by
old mammalian emotional wiring. However, people who approach their
drive satisfaction activities with a predominantly “solution-based”
orientation will often need the cooperation of neighbors to execute a high-
payoff solution. In these cases collaboration becomes an important part of
the collective behavior set. If the group persists in this communal-based
solution mode, they will likely form a Collaborative Culture.
Collaborative Cultures, however, were demonstrated to be fragile. The
group needs to have or retain some form of purpose to justify the
collaboration or the group will fall apart. Also, very successful
Collaborative Cultures can fall victim to their own successes, where the
abundance created by collaborative activities generates new levels of
greed. This creates a new cycle of competition to grab up the excess.
Emotions flare, and collaboration dies. The pervasive, emotion-driven
Competitive Culture re-emerges from the social backdrop to re-assert
itself as the default human culture.
Lastly, we examined the possibility of setting up systems of rules
or bodies of law that could either protect people in a group or society from
each other, or that could actually promote a wider range of drive
satisfaction options for its members. In the first case, protecting each other
from various forms of personal aggression, the aim is to keep inherently
competitive, and often violent, behavior from taking too large a toll on a
society. This prevents social order from collapsing, and allows people
some measure of security for themselves and for the goods they might
accrue. In the second case, law can be a means of promoting and
supporting wider possibilities for collaboration, going beyond mere
security against internal strife and creating expansive environments of
economic opportunity.
Notes
^ Thomas Meylan, “Using Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems
Engineering to Understand Workplace Patterns of Thought and Behavior: An Empirical
Model of Human Information Processing,” Autumn, 2005, Quarterly Journal of the
Washington Academy of Sciences.
^Thomas Meylan, “Environmental Impacts on Human Moods and Emotions:
Implications for Workplace and Workflow Design,” Winter, 2007, Quarterly Journal of
the Washington Academy of Sciences.
Washington Academy of Sciences
39
A FAMILY OF SCIENTISTS
In honor and memory of one of our own the Washington Academy of
Sciences takes pride in presenting a reprint of a paper by Harvey C.
Hayes, a member of the WAS more than half a century ago. The paper is
reprinted by the kind permission of the Franklin Institute and first
appeared in The Journal of The Franklin Institute Vol. 197, No. 3, pp.
323-354 (March, 1924). Dr. Hayes’s step grandson, James C. Cole, also an
acoustic scientist, is currently an officer of the Washington Academy of
Sciences, and we are grateful to him for providing much of the
information below.
Dr. Harvey C. Hayes was a pioneer in the investigation of
underwater acoustics and was the first recipient of the “Pioneer in
Underwater Acoustics” award from the Acoustical Society of America. He
was also awarded the Levy gold metal and the John Scott medal, both
from the Franklin Institute, and the Cullum geographical metal engraved
with the inscription “Harvey C. Hayes ^ — He supplied science with a new
instrument for mapping the ocean floor and thereby opened a new chapter
in Marine Physiography 1925.” Dr. Hayes served on the executive council
of the Acoustical Society of America from 1935-1938 and in 1960 was
elected as one of only 17 Honorary Fellows, as of 2007.
Dr. Hayes began his career with the Navy during World War I,
working at the Navy Experimental Station located at Fort Trumbull, New
London, Connecticut. After the war, he continued his efforts at the Navy
Experimental Station in Annapolis, Maryland. Dr. Hayes became the first
superintendent of the Naval Research Laboratory’s Sound Division when
the laboratory opened in 1923 and served in that position for 24 years,
retiring in 1947 after serving the Navy for a total of 30 years.
Dr. Hayes’ research included a broad range of acoustics research
topics. In addition to the sonic depth finder and the development of
operational sonars for the Navy, he also explored diverse areas such as
lamination defects in metal plates, electrodynamic sound projectors, sound
radiation from ships propellers, acoustically transparent materials for
sonar domes, microphones and accelerometers.
“Dr. Hayes is recognized as the first person to accumulate any
substantial amount of data at sea and was later responsible for one of the
Fall 2007
40
two operational sonar equipments used by the Navy at the outbreak of
World War II.”[1]. Hayes’ sea data collection is described by Gary Weir
from the U.S. Navy Historical Center [2], ‘To the universal acclaim of the
scientific community, Hayes had then used his invention (the sonic depth
finder (SDF) [3]) to make the first complete bottom profile of any ocean,
during the June 1922 transatlantic crossing of the destroyer Stewart
(DD224) from Newport, RJiode Island, to Gibraltar. With Hayes on
board, the Stewart, . . . made 900 soundings of the ocean to depths beyond
three thousand feet. The news of this accomplishment went through the
scientific community like a bolt of lightning. ... The Navy’s new
instrument gave scientists their first look at the configuration of the ocean
floor in all its irregularity. Sound now at last began to reveal what years of
work with rope and wire soundings lines had only suggested. Civilian
science quickly concluded that the number and range of naval vessels as
well as the revolutionary potential of the SDF made the U.S. Navy an
indispensable partner in the exploration of the ocean.”
Included here is a tribute to Dr. Hayes on the occasion of the
dedication of the Harvey C. Hayes Room of Quarter A at the Naval
Research Laboratory, May 21, 1999.
“.. .the enemy has rendered the U-boat ineffective, not by
superior tactics or strategy, but through superiority in the
field of science, which finds its expression in the modem
battle weapon — detection.” Admiral Karl Doenitz.
“These are among the highest words of tribute to the genius and
inventiveness of the Navy’s acoustic pioneers spearheaded by Dr. Harvey
Cornelius Hayes, after whom the USNS Hayes [4] is named, in a
recovered report by Karl Doenitz, Grand Admiral of the German Navy
during World War II.”[5]
Currently Patent Office searches prior to 1975 cannot be searched
by inventor; for the interested reader we list the patent numbers of 73
patents awarded to Harvey C. Hayes. Copies of these patents can be
obtained at http://www.uspto.gov/ or http://www.pat2pdf org/.
Washington Academy of Sciences
41
Patents Issued to Harvey C. Hayes (1923- 1944)
2,433,845
References
[1] J. Schultz, “Family donates collection highlighting distinguished
scientific career of Dr. Harvey C. Hayes”, Labstracts, U.S. Government
Printing Office 19285-361-1053, June?, 1999.
[2] G. Weir, “Surviving the Peace: The Advent of American Naval
Oceanography, 1914-1924,”Naval War College Review, V. L, No. 4,
Autumn 1997.
[3] H.C. Hayes, “The sonic depth finder”. Proceed. Amer. Philosophical
Society, V. LXIII, No. 1, pp. 134-150, 1924
[4] USNS Hayes (T-AGOR-16), commissioned July 2, 1970.
[5] NRL Brochure for the occasion of the dedication of the Harvey C.
Hayes Room of Quarters A at the Naval Research Laboratory, May 21,
1999.
Fall 2007
This page intentionally blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
43
MEASURING OCEAN DEPTHS BY ACOUSTICAL
METHODS'
HARVEY C. HAYES, Ph.D.
Research Physicist, U. S. Navy
The possibility of measuring ocean depths by acoustical methods
has been recognized for a number of years and numerous methods and
devices developed and designed for this purpose are listed in the patent
office. Most of these devices attempt to determine the depth in terms of
the time required for a sound signal to travel to the sea-bottom and reflect
back again -to the surface.
One of the first patents pertaining to this art was granted to A. F.
Hells, of Boston, Massachusetts, wherein he was allowed two broad claims
covering the method of determining depths by measuring the time
intervening between the transmitting of a sound signal near the sea-surface
and the return of its echo from the sea-bottom. Since then numerous
patents have been, taken out covering specific apparatus designed for
measuring this time interval, but none of these devices has proved to be
practical for the reason that they have failed in most cases to measure the
time interval in question with sufficient reliability and accuracy, and in
many cases have proved to be too delicate to withstand the adverse
conditions often met with on sea-going vessels and too complicated to be
operated by a ship's personnel. A brief description of some of these
devices follows: Fig. 1 shows the principle of operation of a sounding
device invented by Reginald A. Fessenden.^ Numeral 1 represents a disc
made of insulating material that is rotated at a uniform speed by motor (2).
The disc carries a conducting segment (3) that closes the electrical circuit
through a submarine sound transmitter (4) when it passes beneath brushes
(5), thereby sending out a sound signal. This segment also closes the
circuit through a telephone receiver (6) when it passes across the brushes
(7). If the echo of the signal meets the microphone or other type of sound
receiver represented by numeral 8 at the instant segment (3) short-circuits
brushes (7), it will be heard in the telephone receiver (6) and the time of
' Presented at the Stated Meeting of the Institute held Wednesday, March 21, 1923.
Reprinted by permission from The Franklin Institute, The Journal of The Franklin
Institute. Vol. 197, No. 3, pp. 323-354 (March, 1924).
^ For a more complete description of the Fessenden depth-sounding apparatus, see U. S.
Patent No. 1,217,585.
Fall 2007
44
sound transmit from the transmitter to the receiver by wav of reflection
from the sea-bottom will be equal to the time required for segment (3) to
travel the angular distance subtended between the two pairs of brushes and
indicated by the pointer (9) on the scale (10). This condition is brought
about by rotating brushes (7) about the insulating disc (1) by means of the
handle (11).
Figure 1
In practice the disc must be rotated at considerable speed or the
angle swept out by the segment while the sound travels to the sea-bottom
and back will be too small to measure with sufficient accuracy. This
results in sending out sound signals in rapid succession and the return of
echoes from the sea-bottom in still more rapid succession for the reason
that a sound signal usually echoes back and forth between, the surface and
sea-bottom several times before its energy is absorbed. Under such
conditions sound can be heard in the telephone for numerous settings of
the brushes (7) and the relation between the depth and the scale reading
becomes indefinite.
Another device for measuring this time interval makes use of an
electromagnetic recorder. This device, illustrated in principle in Fig. 2,
attempts to determine the short-time intervals involved in taking shallow
soundings by recording the transmitted signal and its returning echo on the
magnetic tape (1), while it is driven rapidly by means of variable speed
Washington Academy of Sciences
45
motors (2), and then measuring the time interval between the two records
when the tape is run at a much slower speed. This measured time interval
multiplied by the ratio of the reduced speed to the recording speed gives
the time interval between signal and echo. In the figure, numeral 3
represents the recording and reproducing magnets. These also serve for
erasing the record. Numeral 4 represents a double- throw double-pole
switch by means of which magnets (3) can be inductively connected with
transmitter (5) and receiver (6) for recording the signal and its echo, or
with the telephone head set (7) for hearing the reproduced record. The
rheostat for controlling the speed of the motors is indicated by numeral 8.
Fig. 2.
This method, while excellent from the standpoint of theory, has not proved
to be practical for the following reasons:
(a) The magnetic tape does not record the signals unless their intensity
is above a certain threshold value, which is comparatively high,
and the echoes cannot be kept above this value over regions where
the coefficient of reflection of the sea-bottom is low or over
regions where the depth is great.
(b) The local disturbing noises always present on shipboard are
comparatively intense and their record ofttimes distorts the record
of the signals and echoes to such an extent that they cannot be
readily recognized, and as a result the time interval cannot be
accurately measured.
Fall 2007
46
(c) It is difficult to determine accurately the ratio between the
reproducing and recording speeds of the motor.
(d) The time interval, as measured at the retarded speed, cannot be
determined with a high degree of accuracy for the reason that the
record of both the signal and the echo then becomes less sharply
defined; and although this method of determining the short interval
between signal and echo results in some gain in accuracy, the gain
is not proportional to the ratio between the recording and
reproducing speeds.
(e) Finally the method is too slow to give soundings on short notice, as
is ofttimes desirable when a ship is in dangerous waters.
Samuel Spitz, of Oakland, California, has attempted to measure
ocean depths with apparatus that first records the signal and its echo on a
magnetic tape and then amplifies the reproduced record. He utilizes this
increased electrical output to operate a complicated system of relays and
magnetic clutches and claims to accurately record by means of a pointer
and dial the depth corresponding to the time interval between signal and
echo as recorded on the tape. His method and apparatus, as disclosed in,
U. S. Patent 1,409,794, would appear to have the inherent weaknesses of
the “magnetic tape method” plus the difficulties and uncertainties that are
always present to a greater or less degree in complicated relay systems.
But even if the relays should function perfectly, it would seem that the
local disturbing noises, caused by propellers, auxiliary machinery and
slapping of waves, which (no matter how selective the receiving system
may be) are recorded on the magnetic tape to some extent, would ofttimes
trigger off the automatic recording apparatus and give erroneous records
of depth that might be misleading. A depth-sounding device is worse than
useless unless it can be absolutely depended upon, to give reliable
sounding data at all times.
Alexander Behm, of Kiel, Germany, started work on the problem
of measuring ocean depths by means of sound waves about twelve years
ago. His first efforts were devoted to methods that involved measuring the
time interval between signal and echo. Recognizing the inherent
difficulties in making such measurements, he turned his attention to the
possibility of making depth determinations by measuring the intensity of
the echo. His method of doing this can be understood in connection with
Fig. 3 wherein numeral 1 represents a submarine sound transmitter
designed to produce a fairly pure sound of constant intensity and pitch.
The sound passes from the transmitter to the sea-bottom and a portion
Washington Academy of Sciences
47
reflects back to the receiver, represented by numeral 2, where by acting
upon a resonant chamber it causes a tuning fork to vibrate. He measures
the intensity of the echo in terms of the amplitude of vibration of a small
bead carried by one prong of the fork and observes the amplitude of its
motion by means of a microscope. And since the intensity of the echo and
the amplitude of vibration of the fork are each a function of the depth, he
calibrates the microscope scale directly in terms of depth.
While this method avoids the difficulties encountered in measuring
short time intervals, it introduces others that are equally hard to overcome
and one that cannot be overcome. It is very difficult to generate a sound
having constant intensity and pitch under various operating conditions,
and it is equally difficult to keep a receiver accurately tuned to this pitch
and of unvarying sensitivity. It is probable that Doctor Behm has gone far
toward overcoming these two difficulties, but we fail to see how he can
make allowance for the variations of the coefficient of reflection of the
sea-bottom where, according to our observations, this factor may change
as much as 25 per cent over comparatively short distances.
It is probable that Doctor Behm fully recognized these weaknesses
in his method and apparatus for he later resumed his efforts to measure the
time between signal and echo and has finally succeeded in making this
measurement with a high degree of accuracy with comparatively simple
and rugged apparatus. His transmitter, represented by numeral 1 of Fig. 4,
Fall 2007
48
consists of a tube extended through the ship's skin and the sound signal is
produced by exploding a cartridge that has been slipped into position in
this tube. The cartridge is fired electrically by closing a key mounted
on or near the recording apparatus which is located in the chart house or
on the bridge. The receiver is mounted in a similar tube, numeral 2,
projecting from the opposite side of the ship's hull where it is shielded
from the direct sound generated by the cartridge. The means for recording
the time of sound transit between transmitter and receiver by way of
reflection from the sea-bottom consists of an ingenious design of
chronograph that is started moving when the cartridge is fired and stopped
by the fluctuation in the receiver circuit when the sound wave, reflected
from the sea-bottom, strikes the receiver.
This sounding device, which the inventor calls the Behm-Echolot,
represents a large amount of excellent research and the exercise of
Washington Academy of Sciences
49
considerable ingenuity. It should give reliable sounding data for depths
within about eight) fathoms.
As an instrument for aiding navigation, any depth-sounding device
should be able to do more than determine the depth of water occasionally.
It should serve to take any number of soundings in rapid succession in
order that well-defined charted contours may be identified with certainty
and thus serve for determining the position of the vessel. In case of the
Behm-Echolot this would not only require a very large supply of
cartridges, but would prove to be expensive.
It has been found in practice that a determination of the slope of
the sea-bottom is helpful in locating ' landmarks " along a charted route
and that the value of a depth-sounding device, as an aid and safeguard to
navigation, is greatly enhanced if it will also serve to determine the
direction of sound beacons at dangerous points along shore and at harbor
entrances, and also signals from other vessels. The depth-sounding devices
developed in the U. S. Navy, and which will now be described, serve these
purposes. The determination of depth by acoustical methods was assigned
as a research problem in the Bureau of Engineering of the U. S. Navy as a
result of a discovery made on the transport U. S. S. Von Steuben during a
trip from New York to Brest in March, 1919. This vessel had been
equipped with one of the submarine sound receivers that the Navy had
developed at its New London Station for use in locating U-boats and it
was proposed to test the value of the device as an aid and safeguard to
navigation. It was found that the direction of nearby vessels and submarine
bell signals could be accurately determined while leaving New York
harbor and when approaching Brest, but that in mid-ocean the propeller
sounds of other vessels as well as of the Von Steuben herself could not be
heard. This fact led to the discovery that the only sounds heard in a
submarine sound receiver located near the surface are the components that
have been reflected from the sea-bottom. The explanation of this fact can
be readily understood by referring to Fig. 5 wherein (A- A) represents the
sea-surface, {B-B) the sea-bottom, and T and R a sound transmitter and a
sound receiver, respectively, each submerged a distance represented by
{P-Q). If the distance {P-Q) is small compared with the distance {T-R)
(as is usually true in practice), then the two sound paths (T -P -R) and (T
-Q -R) are practically of equal length. Sound from T reaches R by the
three paths {T-P-R), {T-Q-R), and {T-O-R), but since the two paths
{T-P-R) and {T-Q-R) are practically equal and since the surface-reflected
ray suffers a change of phase of a half a wave-length upon reflection, the
Fall 2007
50
sound traversing these two paths interferes destructively at R and only the
sound that has been reflected from the sea-bottom can be heard.
Mutual cancellation of direct and surface -reflected rays*
Figure 5
As soon as it was discovered that the sounds heard in our receivers
had arrived by way of reflection from the sea-bottom, it appeared probable
that methods could be developed for determining the depth of the water by
means of submarine sound waves, providing the character of the sea-
bottom in general is such as to reflect sufficient sound energy to give an
audible echo. Before starting this work some preliminary tests on the
efficiency of the deep-sea floor as a sound reflector were made on the
destroyer U. S. S. Wilks which showed that clear audible echoes of signals
from submarine sound oscillators could be received from depths at least as
great as 2000 fathoms. Since that time good echoes have been received in
depths greater than, 3000 fathoms and so far as the author knows there has
been no case reported where echoes could not be heard.
It should be stated, however, that nothing definite is known
regarding the coefficient of reflection of the sea-bottom other than the fact
that echoes have been heard over such regions or routes as have been
tested. Over certain regions it has been noted that the echoes are much less
clear-cut than are the signals. This distortion is doubtless due to a gradual
change in the density of the material forming the sea-bottom. But the fact
that an echo is heard at all would seem to argue against the somewhat
general conception that the deep-sea bottom consists of an ooze-like
deposit perhaps hundreds of feet thick, the density of which increases very
Washington Academy of Sciences
51
slowly from the top to the rock foundation beneath. From the character of
the echoes one would judge that the density of the ooze does not vary
much from that of water throughout its depth or else that it has settled to a
dense foundation, except for a comparatively shallow region near its
surface. If the first assumption is true, the sound penetrates the ooze and
reflects from the underlying rock. If the second is true, the sound reflects
from the solidified ooze and the comparatively thin transition layers
immediately above this.
Three methods have been developed for determining ocean depths
by means of sound waves, two of which serve for measuring depths less
than about one hundred fathoms and one of which serves for measuring
any depth greater than about forty fathoms. All three methods make use of
the time required for a sound signal to travel from a transmitter to a
receiver by way of reflection from the sea-bottom. It will be seen that this
time interval, which is too short to be measured directly with sufficient
accuracy, can be determined indirectly as a function of a much shorter
time interval that can be very accurately measured. Of the two methods
that serve for determining shoal depths, one has been termed the "Angle of
Reflection Method" and the other the “Standing Wave Method.” The
method that serves for greater depths has been called the “Echo Method.”
The angle of reflection method can be understood by referring to
Fig. 6, wherein {B-B) represents the sea-bottom (supposed for
convenience to be horizontal), and {S-S) represents the surface. The
propeller {P) of the vessel represents a sound source and R\ and R2
represent two sound receivers mounted within the peak-tank or within a
blister-like enclosed space on the outside of the ship’s skin. These
receivers are spaced a distance ( I ) on a horizontal line passing through the
propeller. The distance between P and the mid-point between the two
receivers is 2L. The path of the sound waves from propeller to receivers
will be {P-O-R). If the sea-bottom is horizontal, the triangle (P-O-R) is
isosceles, having the side {P-O) equal to the side {O-R). If IT represents
the time of sound transit from P to R, and V represents the velocity of
sound in sea-water, then.
Fall 2007
52
Sounding by angle of neflection method.
Figure 6
(\) = {V.Tf -
V‘T i
(2) and — ^ (corresponding sides of similar triangles)
(3) wherefore V»T = - ^ ,
V*AT
Substituting the value of (V.T) in equation (1) gives
V--{A>T) [ F^(Ar) j
(5) wherefore H = L
-F^.(A7')"
V-AT
where AT is the difference in the time of arrival at the two receivers of
corresponding increments of the propeller sounds. The total depth (Z)) is
given by the equation:
(6) D = C^H = C + L
sle^-V^AT^
V>AT
Washington Academy of Sciences
53
All the factors on the right-hand side of equation (6) are constant and
known except AT". The distance the receivers and propellers are submerged
is C, half the distance from the propellers (or whatever source of sound is
used) is L, the spacing of the two receivers is I , and V is the velocity of
sound in sea- water which may be regarded as constant. The determination
of depth therefore depends upon the determination of AT. This time factor,
though much smaller than the time interval between signal and echo, can
be determined with a high degree of accuracy by making use of the so-
called binaural sense.
It has been proved experimentally that the direction of sounds is
largely determined by the difference in the time of arrival of
corresponding portions of the sound waves at the two ears. If the sound
strikes the right ear first one unconsciously judges the source to be located
at his right, if it strikes the left ear first he judges the source to be located
to his left. If the sound strikes both ears simultaneously it appears to be
neither to the right nor left and is said to be binaurally centred. The sense
of direction of sounds, which is dependent upon the difference in the time
of arrival at the two ears, has come to be called the “binaural sense.”
When one judges the direction of a sound to be neither to his right nor left,
or in other words, when he judges it to be binaurally centred, he
unconsciously estimates that the sound waves strike the two ears
simultaneously; and the high development of the binaural sense is such
that he estimates correctly to within about one two-hundred-thousandth of
a second.
Of the two receivers shown in Fig. 6, suppose the output from one
is brought to one ear of the operator, and that from the other receiver is led
to the other ear, respectively. If the time of energy transit to the ear from
each receiver is the same, the difference in the time of arrival of the sound
at the two ears will be AT, the time difference in arrival at the two
receivers, and, through the operation of the binaural sense, the sound will
appear to come from the side of the operator because one ear is stimulated
earlier than the other. Moreover, the sound will appear to be located on the
side of the observer carrying the ear that receives the earlier stimulation. If
now the energy-conducting path leading from each receiver to its
respective ear be constructed so that the time of transit over the path can
be varied continuously or by very small increments, it will be possible for
the operator to make the sound reach his two ears simultaneously by
increasing the time of transit across the path leading to the ear that is first
stimulated or decreasing the time of transit between the other receiver and
Fall 2007
54
its respective ear or by increasing the time of transit to one ear and
simultaneously decreasing the time of transit to the other ear by a proper
amount. When the sound has been binaurally centred in this way the
difference in the time of transit across the two paths, connecting between
the two receivers and the observer's ears, respectively, is equal to the time
increment (AT).
The process of binaurally centring a sound in this way has been
called “compensation,”^ and any device used for this purpose is called a
“compensator.” It is evident that the compensator can be calibrated to give
the value of AT or any function of AT, and as a result can be calibrated to
give the depth (D) directly. This is done in practice.
It is to be noticed that the last term of equation (6) can be written
as the tangent of the angle ((|)) that the direction (O-R) makes with the
horizontal line (P-R) and that equation (6) can be written:
{!) D = C + L tan (\>.
When the sounding equation is put in this form it becomes obvious
that the sounding data given by the angle of reflection method become
more accurate as the depth becomes less, a result much to be desired. On
the other hand, it shows that the method breaks down for depths so great
that the angle (p) approaches a right angle. It has been found in practice
that this method gives reliable soundings to depths equal to about three
times the distance between the sound source and the receivers. For most
vessels this will cover depths as great as 100 fathoms and ofttimes more.
It is evident that the method, as described, becomes inaccurate
when the slope of the sea-bottom varies from the horizontal for the reason
that the triangle (P-O-R) will not be isosceles. In. general the method
gives too great values when the vessel approaches shoaling water and too
small when running into
^ The process of binaurally centring a sound by compensation was developed by the Navy
in 1917-18 at its research station in New London, Conn. For a more complete description
of the process, see Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 59, No. 1, 1920, or the Marine Rev., Oct.,
1921.
Washington Academy of Sciences
55
Method for eliminating error due to shelving; bottom.
Figure 7
increasing depths. In most regions the sea-bottom within the hundred
fathom curve is fairly uniform for the reason that it has been, leveled off
by the action of storm waves and the method described has been found to
give fairly accurate sounding data.
By referring to Fig. 7 it will be seen that the method can be made
accurate by installing a sound transmitter and receiver in each end of the
vessel. The same compensator serves for both sets of receivers as does the
same power outfit for driving both transmitters. The operator sounds
transmitter (72) and with his compensator measures (|)i. Then by throwing
a multipole switch he sounds T\ and measures (|)2. It can be shown that
(8) D = C + 2L
tan 0, •tan 02
tan 0 -h tan 0,
and that a, the slope of the sea-bottom, is given by the equation.
(9) a = — —
2
While this more refined method is to be preferred for making
hydrographic surveys, the simpler approximate method serves for
Fall 2007
56
navigational purposes as can be seen by a consideration of the curves
shown in Figs. 8 and 9.
The curves of Fig. 8 represent sounding data taken by the U. S. S.
Breckenridge while en route from Charleston, South Carolina, to Key
West. The course ran in part along the edge of the continental plateau,
where the sea-bottom was very uneven and erratic. Two successive casts
of the hand-lead made not more than a minute apart, while the vessel was
not steaming over five
Figure 8
knots, ofttimes showed a discrepancy of five or six fathoms. Under such
conditions it was not expected that the acoustical sounding data would be
at all accurate. However, the curves seem to show that the soundings given
by the hydrophone are perhaps more reliable than any of the others. It is
certain that these soundings, which are represented by the full heavy line,
do not depart from the charted values, which are represented by the light
full line as much as do the soundings taken by the lead-line or the
sounding machine. Moreover, it will be noticed that, except at the 138-
mile mark, the acoustical curve passes through every point where two or
more of the other curves coincide. This fact tended to make all who took
Washington Academy of Sciences
57
part in the test believe the acoustical sounding data were, on the whole,
most reliable.
The sounding data represented by the curves of Fig. 9 were taken
during a run from Newport, Rhode Island, out to the hundred-fathom
curve and back, and show the accuracy with which the apparatus can give
soundings where the sea-bottom is somewhat regular. It will be noticed
that the acoustical sounding data agree very closely with the charted depth
except at the beginning and end of the run where the water was shoal. In
these
regions the agreement with the hand-line data is close. All who took part
in this test believe the charted depths in the shoal region are too small for
the reason that the hand-line soundings consistently gave about two
fathoms greater depth; and there was a general feeling that the acoustical
data represented the depth very accurately at all times.
The term “M V -Hydrophone,” used in the caption of both Figs. 8
and 9, refers to the type of submarine sound receiver used for determining
the time increment (AT). This type of receiver employs several sound
receptors instead of two as described above. The receivers are equally
spaced along a straight line passing through the propeller (P) and so
connected through the compensator that the forward half of the receivers
Fall 2007
58
connects with one ear in place of a single receiver as described, and the
receivers of the rear half of the line connect through the compensator to
the other ear. The compensator itself is so ingeniously designed that when
any sound striking the receivers is binaurally centred the responses to this
sound from all the receivers arrive at the ears in phase. This results in
making the intensity of the received sound considerably greater than it
would be if only one receiver connected with each ear. But this is not the
only advantage of this type of receiver.
Schematic diagram of a stibmarine sound transmitter*
Figure 10
Any sound that reaches the receivers and is not binaurally centred will
have the responses from the several receivers arriving at the ears out of
phase and they will partially destroy one another by destructive
interference with the result that the sound heard is less intense than it
would be if only one receiver connected with each ear. The M V -
Hydrophone, therefore, can be focussed on any sound that the operator
desires to hear, so that this particular sound gives a loud, clear response at
Washington Academy of Sciences
59
the ears while all other sounds, and hence the local disturbing sounds, are
greatly weakened."^
The ship's propellers form a convenient sound source for use in
determining depths by the angle of reflection method, but any submarine
sound transmitter of the oscillator type serves equally well. The principle
of operation of such a sound transmitter can be understood by reference to
Fig. 10, wherein numeral 1 indicates a rigid diaphragm in contact with the
water, numeral 2 represents one-half of a powerful electromagnet rigidly
attached to the diaphragm, and numeral 3 represents the other half of the
electromagnet which is suspended in position by the elastic steel rods
represented by numerals 4. When an alternating current is passed through
the magnetizing coil, the suspended half of the magnet vibrates back and
forth alternately compressing and stretching the rods by which it is
suspended and exerting a powerful thrust and pull on the heavy diaphragm
that may equal several tons.
Because of the incompressibility of water, it becomes necessary to
exert great forces on the diaphragm to produce even a slight amplitude of
motion. The submarine sound oscillator can be used for sending code or
any other kind of signals by placing a key in the alternating current circuit.
A description of the M V -Hydrophone will be found in the Marine
Review of October, 1921.
Fall 2007
60
The “Standing Wave Method” of determining depths can be
understood by referring to Fig. 11 wherein T represents a submarine sound
transmitter and R represents a submarine sound receiver, the two being
separated a distance {L). The sound transmitter is driven by an alternating
current supply so designed that the frequency of the current can be
controlled and varied by the operator over the range included between
about 500 and 1500 cycles per second. This circuit is provided with means
for giving the frequency with a high degree of accuracy at all times. The
operator uses a two-telephone head set, one phone of which is inductively
connected with the A. C. circuit that drives the sound transmitter. This
connection is preferably made through a variocoupler. The other phone is
connected with the output from the sound receiver {R). With the phones
connected in this way, it will be seen that the sound heard in the
inductively connected phone has, at all times, a definite phase relation
with the sound waves leaving the transmitter and the sound generated by
the other phone has a definite phase relation with the sound waves
reaching the receiver. If the operator adjusts the frequency properly, he
can make the sound heard in the two phones have the same phase and can
recognize this condition through the fact that the sound will then be
binaurally centred. If the sound leaving the transmitter has the same phase
as the sound waves arriving at the receiver, then (T-O-R), the sound path
between transmitter and receiver, represents a whole number of wave-
lengths. Calling this path-length, S\ and the time required for sound to
travel a distance equal to one wave-length, AT; and the velocity of sound
in sea-water F, we have the relation:
(1) S = V^N*At
where NAt represents the time required for the sound to travel the whole
path-length. But A/, which represents the time for one wave to pass a fixed
point, is equal to one second divided by the frequency («) of the sound.
Expressed as an equation, this becomes:
(2) A/=-
n
and by substituting this value in equation (1), we have:
V
(3) S = N-
n
Washington Academy of Sciences
61
and the path-length (5) between transmitter and receiver would be known
if the number of wave-lengths (AO in the standing wave system were
known.
The value of N can be found by varying the frequency of the sound
until a second standing-wave system is established.
Suppose the operator adjusts the frequency so that the sound is
binaurally centred. Call the frequency (n\). This will be equal to the
frequency of the A. C. current. Then suppose he slowly raises or lowers
the frequency. He will notice that the sound apparently passes away from
binaural centre and finally comes back across centre. Each time the sound
comes back across binaural centre, he has varied the number of waves in
the standing wave system by one. Suppose he varies the frequency until
the number of waves in the system differs from the number in the original
system by a and he determines this number by counting the number of
times the sound comes to a binaural centre while he slowly changes the
frequency. Call the final frequency which he carefully adjusts for a
binaural balance, W2. Then since the path-length (iS) is the same in the two
cases, we have:
(4) S = N— = {N±a) —
wherefore (5) N = ±a ^ — ,
n^-n,
the sign before a being such as to make N positive. Substituting this value
for N in equation (4) gives:
n,-n\
which gives a very simple working formula for determining S, the sound-
path from the transmitter to the receiver by way of reflection from the sea-
bottom.
It will be noticed that the determination of S does not furnish
sufficient data for calculating the depth except when the sea-bottom is
horizontal as shown in the figure. The point of reflection (o) may be
Fall 2007
62
anywhere on the surface of an ellipse having T and R as the two foci and
the sum of the radius vectors (0-7) and {0-R) equal to S. If, however, the
M V -Hydrophone is used for the receiver, the angle ((|)) that the radius
vector {O-R) makes with the principle axis {T-R) can be readily
determined. This furnishes data for the complete solution of the depth and
the slope of the sea-bottom.
This method has proved to be extremely accurate for measuring
shallow depths. It gives greater accuracy as the depth becomes more
shallow for the reason that the less the depth the greater the change of
frequency that is required to change the number of waves in the standing
wave system. The method breaks down at great depths for the reason that
a small change in the frequency introduces so many waves into the system
and so rapidly that they cannot be accurately counted and thus the factor a
becomes indefinite.
From the above description, it might be thought that each sounding
taken by the standing wave method requires the solution of a problem in
conic sections and would therefore be slow and cumbersome in practice.
Such, however, is not the case. Having determined the value of S and (|),
the depth can be determined from a family of curves with very little effort
or loss of time.
It will be noticed that the apparatus employed for utilizing the
standing wave method of determining depths is practically the same as
that used with the angle of reflection method. The same receiver and
transmitter serves equally well for both methods, but the standing wave
method requires, in addition, some means for controlling the pitch of the
transmitted signal and a frequency meter for determining the pitch.
The method, as outlined, has been found to give accurate results
and to be easily applied. It can be modified somewhat without impairing
its efficiency. Instead of energizing one phone by inductive connection
with the A. C. circuit of the transmitter, it can as well be energized by a
second receiver located near the transmitter. And instead of energizing the
two phones separately so that the binaural sense can be utilized for
adjusting the frequency to bring about a definite phase relation between
the sound leaving the transmitter and that reaching the receiver, both
currents can be passed through both phones in parallel, or series, in which
case the observer can adjust the frequency to give a maximum or
minimum response in the phones. He will then determine a by counting
the number of maxima or minima, respectively, that occur during the
Washington Academy of Sciences
63
change of frequency from the first to the second adjustment. This
arrangement can be used by an operator who is deaf in one ear.
The “Echo Method” of determining depths is very similar to the
standing wave method. It consists of sending out a continuous series of
short sound signals separated by equal time intervals and means for
varying continuously the time interval between successive signals from
about one-tenth of a second to about ten seconds, the means being such
that the interval between successive signals can be accurately determined.
If S represents the distance the sound travels in passing from the
transmitter to the receiver by way of reflection from the sea-bottom, t
represents the time of transit and V represents the velocity of sound in
seawater, then we have the relation:
and it becomes necessary to determine t.
If the period between successive signals is made such that a signal
returns to the receiver at the same instant that one is sent out from the
transmitter, then we have the equivalent of a standing wave system, and if
p represents the time interval between successive signals we have the
relation:
(2)t = N.p,
where N is the number of signals that are in transit between the transmitter
and receiver. Substituting this value for t in equation (1) gives:
(3)5= V.N.p.
The factor V is known and the factor p can be determined by the
apparatus that is employed to automatically close and open the A. C.
circuit through the transmitter. This apparatus, which serves as an
automatic sending key, will be described later.
To determine N the operator will vary the frequency at which the
sound signals are transmitted until the signals and echoes are heard
simultaneously in the two telephone receivers, one of which is inductively
connected with the A. C. transmitter circuit and the other of which is
connected through the compensator of the M V-Hydrophone to the
submarine sound receivers. This is the same arrangement that is employed
Fall 2007
64
in the standing wave method. The operator may continue varying the
frequency of the signals until the coincidence between signals and echoes
has arrived and passed by a times to the final adjustment. Then since the
distance the sound has travelled between transmitter and receiver has
remained constant, we have the two equations:
{^)S=V.N.px-^ViN±a).p2
where p\ and pi represent, respectively, the time interval between
successive signals in the two cases. Solving for N, we find:
(5) N=-±a
Px-Pi
and by substituting this value for N in equation (4), we have:
(6) 5 = .
Pf-Pi
It is obvious that the sign of N must be such as to make S positive.
Equation (6) can be simplified by replacing the p factors, which
represent the time between signals, by a set of n factors, representing
respectively the frequency of the signals. If this is done, equation (6)
reduces to:
(7) 5 =
V^a
rii -«i
which is identical with the sounding equation developed in connection
with the standing wave method. The automatic transmitting key, that must
serve for varying the value of p and for determining its value, might be a
pendulum with arrangements for varying its period of vibration and for
closing and opening the transmitter circuit. If this were done the factor p
or its reciprocal — would be expressed in terms of the well-known
n
pendulum laws. But since pendulums do not work well on board ships, it
is preferred to use a disc caused to revolve at constant speed, similar to the
revolving plate of a graphophone, and a small friction wheel resting on
Washington Academy of Sciences
65
this surface with means for moving it inwards or outwards along a radius
of the constant speed disc. With this arrangement the speed of the friction
wheel can be varied continuously from zero to a value that is dependent
upon the speed of the disc and the ratio of the radius of the disc to that of
the friction wheel. The closing and opening of the transmitter circuit is
accomplished by contact points operated by a cam-wheel attached to the
axis of the friction wheel. If this cam carries one tooth, one signal will be
transmitted for each revolution of the friction wheel, while if the cam
carries C teeth equally spaced about its circumference there will be C
signals transmitted for every revolution of the friction wheel.
Suppose the constant period of revolution of the disc is P seconds
and that the radius of the friction wheel is r. Also suppose the distance
from the centre of the disc to the point of contact between the disc and
friction wheel is R. Then since there is no slip between the friction
surfaces we have:
(8)
IttR
P
iTCr
P
and
(9) p =
Pt
~T’
if the cam-wheel carries one tooth, for then the period p between signals is
the same as the period of revolution of the friction wheel. If, however, the
cam-wheel carries C uniformly spaced teeth, then:
mp=
p.r
and
(11) n = -
P
C*R
p.r
Substituting this value in equation (7) gives for the sounding equation:
Fall 2007
66
(12) ^ =
a*V*P
C{R,-R,y
where a is the number of signals in transit that have been introduced in
passing from the first to the second condition for coincidence between
signals and echoes, V is the velocity of sound in sea-water, P is the
constant period of revolution of the disc, r on is the radius of the friction
wheel, C is the number of teeth the cam that operates the contact points for
closing and opening the transmitter circuit, R\ is the distance from the
centre of the disc to the point of contact with the friction wheel for the first
adjustment for coincidence between signals and echoes in the two phones
and R2 is the corresponding distance for the second similar adjustment.
The accuracy with which depths can be determined by this to
which the speed of the disc method depends upon the degree can be kept
constant and the accuracy with which R can be the disc is driven by a
tuning-fork speed-measured. In practice the disc is driven by a tuning-fork
speed-controlled motor operating through a worm and gear. With this
arrangement the speed of the disc is kept constant to within a tenth of a per
cent. The friction wheel is moved out and in across the disc by means of a
spiral thread operating in a nut, and the position of this wheel on the disc
is determined by means of a micrometer scale on the end of the member
carrying the spiral thread. This arrangement permits of measuring R to
within .002 inch.
A factor that lends for accuracy in adjusting the friction wheel
results from the fact that each signal echoes back and forth between the
sea-bottom and surface several times. And, if the interval between signals
is accurately adjusted for coincidence with any echo, the multiple echoes
will all be coincident; while if the adjustment is not quite accurate, the
multiple echoes will vary from coincidence two, three, or n times as much
as does the first echo. This dispersive effect of the multiple echoes proves
to be an aid in making an accurate adjustment for determining depth,
whereas they prove to be a disturbing factor in case of Fessenden’s
method that has been described. It has been demonstrated in practice that
the value of R can be determined to within two or three-thousandths of an
inch and this results in measuring the time of sound transit to the sea-
bottom and back to within one five-hundredth of a second.
The velocity of a sound in sea-water for moderate depths and
average temperature is about 4800 feet per second. But the velocity (F),
which can be accurately expressed as:
Washington Academy of Sciences
67
F =
where )Li is the adiabatic compressibility and p is the density, is evidently
affected by both the temperature and pressure of the water and will,
therefore, vary with the depth. The variation of the temperature of sea-
water with the depth is not well known over most of the ocean areas, but it
is well established that the temperature conditions below 1000 fathoms or
even 500 fathoms do not vary greatly. Therefore, when the velocity is
determined for depths beyond these values, the variation of depth, which
alone is of value in determining submarine contours, can be determined to
within an error represented by the distance that sound travels in sea-water
in about one five-hundredth of a second or to within about ten feet. But
since in determining depths the distance S that the sound travels in going
from transmitter to receiver is divided by two, the error is also halved, and
the depth variation will be determined to within about a fathom.
The variation in the velocity of sound, as it proceeds to greater
depths, that is produced by increase in pressure, is in opposition to the
variation produced by the change of temperature when, as usual, the
temperature decreases with increasing depth. As a result the average value
of 4800 feet per second for the velocity of sound gives sounding data
accurate to within 1, or at most, 2 per cent. The determination of the
velocity of sound in seawater under various conditions of temperature,
pressure and salinity is being undertaken by the Navy and its solution will
increase the absolute accuracy with which soundings can be taken by the
echo method.
3'
Practical design of some depth finder.
Figure 12
Fall 2007
68
Fig. 12 shows the nature of a practical design of the automatic signalling
key as developed at the Engineering Experiment Station, U. S. N.,
Annapolis, Maryland. A disc (1) twenty inches in diameter, carrying a
vertical axis (2), is driven at a constant speed of one revolution, in ten
seconds by means of a dynamotor (3) whose armature shaft carries a worm
that engages in gear 4 which is keyed to axis 2 at its lower end. The speed
of the dynamotor is kept constant to within a tenth of a per cent by means
of a tuning-fork control for varying the load. The top of disc 1 is covered
with canvas or other suitable material for forming a friction surface for
driving friction-wheel 5. This wheel, which is two inches in diameter,
engages with shaft 6 by means of a slot and spline arrangement such that
member 5 can slide along member 6, but which causes both of these
members to rotate in unison. The axis of shaft 6 is so mounted that it is
parallel with the friction surface of the disc and intersects the axis of
pinion 2 extended upward.
Shaft 6 is supported by self-aligning ball-bearings (7 and 8), the
former of which is set in a groove such that it can slide a short distance up
and down and thereby allow the pressure between members 1 and 5 to be
adjusted by varying the tension on spring 9. It carries two cam-shaped
discs near the end supported by bearing 8, one of which (10) carries a
single saw-tooth-shaped depression and the other (11) carries ten such
depressions uniformly spaced about its circumference. Two spring
members, 12 and 13, bear against the two cam discs, respectively, and by
snapping down into the depressions as the cams rotate, serve to operate the
two pairs of contact points (14 and 15) in such a way as to temporarily
close the alternating current circuit of a submarine sound oscillator
transmitter. Arrangement is provided whereby either spring member can
be made to operate against its respective cam, but which prevents both
members from operating at the same time.
Member 16, which carries a spiral thread engaging in a nut in
member 17, serves to move the friction wheel 5 along shaft 6 and
measures the radius R of the circle that member 5 scribes on member 1 by
means of a micrometer scale on cylinder 18. The smallest scale division
represents one one-hundredth of an inch and readings can be estimated to
tenths of a division.
The sounding equation.
S = 2D =
a»V»P»r
c{R2-R>y
Washington Academy of Sciences
69
when applied to this design of key has the following values for the several
constants:
V = 4800 feet per second.
P = 10 seconds.
r = 1 inch.
C = 1 or 10, depending upon which cam is used.
Inserting these values, we have for D the depth:
D =
48000*(7 ^
^ 7 feet
2C{R,-R,)
or
4000*(7
D - — ^ fathoms,
C[R,-R,)
where, as before stated, a is the change in the number of signals in transit,
brought about by varying the adjustment of the friction wheel through the
radial distance {R2 -R\), and C is one or ten, depending on which cam-
wheel is employed.
When both C and {R2 -R\) are given their greatest value, 10 in each
case, it will be noticed that the device is then adjusted for measuring its
most shallow depth, which is 40 fathoms. With this adjustment the time
interval between successive signals is
Fall 2007
70
one-tenth of a second and the value of a is one. Under such conditions
each signal echoes back to the receiver at the instant the next successive
signal is transmitted and the determination will be very accurate for the
reason that the value {R2 -R\) will be large (ten inches) and any small error
in determining this value will only introduce a small percentage error. But
suppose a depth of 4000 fathoms were being measured. Then in order that
an echo should reflect to the receiver at the same time the next successive
signal is transmitted the time interval between successive signals would
need to be ten seconds and the value of {R2 -R\) would be only one inch.
Under such conditions the slight error made in measuring {R2 -R\) would
result in ten times as much percentage error as in case of the shallow
measurement. If, however, we send the signals ten times as fast, i.e., once
per second, then there would be ten echoes in transit and a would become
ten and the value of {R2 -R\) would now become ten inches, the same as in
case of the shallow depth measurement, with the same resulting error in
our 4000-fathom sounding that was made in determining the shallow
sounding. By choosing a proper value for a, the value of the measured
factor {R2 -R\) can always be made large, and this results in reducing the
experimental error.
Washington Academy of Sciences
71
Some idea of the accuracy with which deep-sea soundings are
determined by the “echo method” can be gained by referring to Fig. 13,
wherein the heavy line curve gives the depth as determined by this method
and the light line curve gives the corresponding charted depth over a
course bearing southwest from the Ambrose Channel Light Ship to
latitude 37 north and thence west to Cape Charles Light Ship. The charted
depths in some instances represent interpellations between somewhat
widely separated soundings on the chart. Nevertheless, the data included
between 2: 00 A.M. and 6: 00 P.M. are over a fairly uniform sea-bottom
and the charted values probably represent the true depth with considerable
accuracy.
A line of soundings taken by the author on board the U. S. S.
destroyer Stewart while she steamed from Newport, Rhode Island, to
Gibraltar, Spain, at a steady speed of 15 knots, has demonstrated the
ruggedness, ease and rapidity of operation, accuracy and dependability of
the acoustical depth-sounding apparatus that has been described. The
apparatus at no time failed to function properly and required no repairs or
adjustments during the entire trip. The average time required to make a
sounding was about one minute. Throughout the course soundings were
taken at least every twenty minutes, and in regions where the depth varied
somewhat rapidly they were taken at times as often as every minute.
These soundings determine the profile across the Atlantic along a
great circle route from Newport to the Azores and from thence across the
Josephine and Gettysburg Banks to Gibraltar.
This profile cannot be reproduced in its entirety, but some idea of
the accuracy with which it represents the variations in depth can be gained
by considering Fig. 14, which refers to the Gettysburg Bank along a
section defined by the course of the Stewart. At the time this Bank was
discovered by the U. S. S. Gettysburg, soundings showed the bottom to
consist of sand and rounded pebbles. The profile of Fig. 14 gives evidence
of old shore
Fall 2007
72
Fig. 14.
terraces at a depth of 400 fathoms, and it therefore appears probable that
this region has been above sea-level at some remote age. During the
months of October and November, 1922, the U. S. S. destroyers Hull and
Corey, using the echo method, made a survey of the ocean floor along the
California coast from San Francisco to Pt. Descanso from the hundred-
fathom curve out to a depth of 2000 fathoms. The area covered was
approximately 35,000 square miles and the work was accomplished in
thirty-eight days. Over 5000 soundings were taken while the ships
steamed steadily at twelve knots. There is no doubt but that these
soundings, as assembled in chart form by the Hydrographic Bureau of the
U. S. Navy, represent the contour of the sea-bottom with considerable
accuracy even though the survey was made at the rate of about 1000
square miles per day. This survey has demonstrated beyond a doubt that
the ocean beds can now be charted with a high degree of accuracy and that
the survey work can be done with a speed and an economy of expense and
effort that has heretofore been believed impossible.
The data represented by this chart fiimish subject-matter for an
extended paper and, therefore, cannot be covered at this time. It may be
Washington Academy of Sciences
73
Stated, however, that this region has been surveyed for the reason that
seismographic records for the past ten years show that numerous
earthquakes have had their origin within this area. It is proposed to re-
survey this area after such records have shown that one or more
earthquakes have had their origin herein. It is hoped that a comparison of
the two charts will give some definite information regarding the
movement of the earth’s crust resulting from such disturbances. A
comparison of the present chart with the older charted values shows
discrepancies of hundreds and even thousands of fathoms in, some
localities. It is uncertain whether these marked variations are due to errors
made in the earlier surveys or to movements of the earth's crust resulting
from the numerous earthquakes that have originated within this region
since that time. It seems certain that repeated surveys of this and other
unstable regions of the sea floor will furnish much valuable data relating
to the movement of the earth’s surface.
The application of the methods and apparatus for taking depth
soundings that have been described are more numerous and valuable than
one might at first suppose, as has become evident to the author through the
many letters of inquiry that he has received.
Their value as an aid and safeguard to navigation has been
repeatedly proved on various vessels of the U. S. Navy. And their value
does not cease when a vessel steams into ocean depths for such survey
work as has already been done shows that the deep-sea mountains and
valleys will furnish numerous “landmarks” for determining the progress of
a vessel, as soon as the main trade routes have been carefully charted.
Moreover, the M V -hydrophone receiver, besides determining the
direction of sound signals used for sounding purposes, will equally well
determine the direction of such signals transmitted from other moving
vessels or from light vessels placed at harbor entrances or at dangerous
points along shore. In this way it serves to prevent collisions during
conditions of low-visibility and to direct vessels safely into harbor or away
from dangerous rocks and shoals. If all ships were equipped with the
sound apparatus that has been described and would sound their submarine
sound transmitter during fog, the navigator could then know the bearing of
every vessel within, a radius of at least ten miles, in addition to knowing
the depth of water underneath his own vessel. With such information at his
disposal, the grounding of, or collision between, vessels could be
absolutely avoided.
Fall 2007
1
74
These sound devices will serve to make a cheap, quick and
accurate survey of rivers and harbor entrances through which a channel is
to be dredged, thereby furnishing accurate data for computing the amount
of material that must be moved. They will also serve to determine the
capacity of reservoirs with a minimum of effort and expense.
A study, during the flood period, of the beds of such rivers as the
Yangste, the Mississippi and others that are wont to overflow and cause
great loss of both lives and property, would doubtless furnish much
valuable information for controlling such streams. The velocity of the
water is usually so great that soundings cannot be made with the hand-
lead, but by means of the “standing wave method” the beds of such rivers
can be surveyed with great accuracy. Such surveys made at numerous
sections of the stream should show over what portion erosion takes place
and what is more important, should show where the sediment is being
deposited. If erosion at the bottom of the stream becomes active when the
velocity of flow exceeds a certain minimum value (as is believed by some
engineers), and if it can be determined what this minimum velocity is, then
it is quite possible that the proper method of controlling the stream will be
to narrow its confines rather than to widen them or raise the dykes, for by
so doing the required cross-section to carry the flow will be gained by
deepening the stream through the process of erosion. The possibilities of
the depth-sounding devices for use in this way are perhaps far greater than
we can now appreciate.
The “echo method” of determining depths is not confined to
determining submarine depths. It should serve equally well for
determining the depth below the earth's surface of abrupt changes or
discontinuities in, the earth's crust such as are offered by coal and oil
deposits or subterranean caverns. These surfaces of discontinuity will
reflect to the surface a part of any sound disturbance that may be
transmitted to them. And though it may seem far-fetched, there is a
possibility that the methods outlined may also be utilized for locating
cracks and blow-holes in large castings.
The apparatus employed with the “echo method,” which has been
described as a means for determining the distance between two points in a
uniform medium when the velocity of sound is known, serves equally well
for determining the velocity of sound between two points in any medium
when the distance they are separated is known. In, this connection this
apparatus may serve to determine the velocity of sound through the rock
formation of a mountain or between borings or workings in mining
Washington Academy of Sciences
75
operations. And since the velocity so determined is equal to the square
root of the elasticity of the formation divided by its density, this
information may lead to the identification of valuable ore.
Of the above-named applications of the acoustical depth-finding
devices that have been described, only two have been put to practical test.
Their ability to aid and safeguard navigation during conditions of low
visibility has been repeatedly demonstrated on ships of the Navy, and the
survey of the sea floor off the California coast together with a more recent
survey of a region off the entrance to the Panama Canal has proved that
the sea floors can now be accurately and easily mapped. An idea of the
value of these devices resulting from these two applications alone can
perhaps be best conveyed by quoting from a prominent captain of the U.
S. Navy, who states, “If it became necessary to dispense with the gyro
compass or acoustical depth-finder on my ship, I should much prefer to
keep the depth-finder apparatus,” and finally from one of our well-known
geologists who says, “Now for the first time in, history the practicability
of securing a map of the vast unknown area of the ocean floors is assured,
with a promise of such a wealth of scientific data of prime importance as
to make these developments of the U. S. Navy rank very high among those
which have advanced our knowledge of the earth.”
Fall 2007
76
Three Generations of Acoustic Research
Harvey C. Hayes’ son and step-grandsons have continued his tradition of
acoustic research.
His son Gordon B. Hayes, a self taught electronic engineer,
followed his childhood interest in amateur radio and began his career
working on the proximity fuse. Later he joined the Naval Research
Laboratory, without his father’s knowledge, and worked on identification
friend-or-foe and radar beacon programs. Following World War II, he
worked at the Naval Underwater Sound Laboratory in New London
Connecticut, where he worked on torpedo countermeasures, the SQS 35,
36 and 38 operational sonar systems as well as acoustic environmental
measurements. Gordon Hayes was granted a patent (3,140,462) on an RF
based transducer that can operate as a hydrophone, microphone or
pressure sensor, etc [1].
Bernard F. Cole, a step-grandson of Harvey C. Hayes, began his
career in 1959 working under a Navy scholarship as a cooperative
education student for the Underwater Sound Laboratory. Mr. Cole’s early
research consisted of defining those physical acoustic properties of the
ocean bottom that most significantly influence bottom-reflected sound [2].
This led to a career of technical studies aimed at relating sonar
propagation, reverberation and performance effects (in both deep and
shallow waters) to environmental acoustic phenomena [3]. The notion for
a sonar system that continuously characterizes its surrounding
environment grew out of one such study [4]. Another study culminated in
a recent article on a unique form of reverberation coherence that
accompanies hull-mounted sonar operation in shallow water [5]. Mr. Cole
retired from the New London Laboratory in 1995 and from a position at
Planning Systems Incorporated in 2004. He currently performs research
as an independent consultant.
James H. Cole, also a step-grandson of Harvey C. Hayes, began his
career investigating acousto-optic imaging and optical detection of sound.
He first proposed the use of fiber optic interferometers for acoustic
detection in 1975 [6] and then demonstrated laboratory operation [7].
After joining the Naval Research Laboratory, he and his coworkers from
the Acoustics and Optical Sciences Division demonstrated the first all
fiber interferometer and the first fiber optic hydrophone to be field tested
[8]. Fiber optic interferometric sensor technology has now been
transitioned to the hull mounted arrays of the Virginia (ssn-774) class
Washington Academy of Sciences
77
submarines [9], and is currently in engineering development for other
operational systems. Mr. Cole has also developed fiber optic microphones
and accelerometers [10]. He is now with the Optical Sciences Division of
Naval Research Laboratory and is currently secretary of the Washington
Academy of Sciences.
[1] US Patent 3,140,462 (July 7, 1964)
[2] B. F. Cole, “Marine Sediment Attenuation and Ocean-Bottom-Reflected Sound”, J.
Acoust. Soc. Amer. V 38, pp. 291-297, (August 1965)
[3] B. F. Cole and E. M. Podeszwa, “Shallow-water bottom reverberation under
downward refraction conditions”, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. V 56, pp. 374-377, (August
1974)
[4] US Patent 5,568,450 (October 22, 1996)
[5] B. Cole, J. Davis, W. Leen, W. Powers and J. Hanrahan, “Coherent bottom
reverberation: Modeling and comparisons with at-sea measurements”, J. Acoust. Soc.
Amer. VI 16, pp. 1985-1994, (October 2004)
[6] J.H. Cole, R.L. Johnson, J.A. Cunningham and P.G. Bhuta, “Optical Detection of
Low frequency Sound’, in Proc. Tech. Prog. Electro-Optical Systems Design Conference-
1975 International Laser Exposition, Anaheim, CA, 1975, pp. 418-426
[7] J.H. Cole, R.L. Johnson and P.G. Bhuta, “Fiber Optic Detection of Sound” J. Acoust.,
Soc. Amer. V 62, p. 1 136, (November 1977)
[8] J. H. Cole and J. A. Bucaro, “Measured noise levels for a laboratory fiber
interferometeric hydrophone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., V. 67(6), pp. 2108-2109, (June
1980)
[9] James H. Cole, Clay Kirkendall, Anthony Dandridge, Gary Cogdell and T. G.
Giallorenzi, “Twenty-five Years of Interferometric Fiber Optic Acoustic Sensors at Naval
Research Laboratory”, J. Washington Academy of Sciences, V. 90(3), p. 40 (2004)
[10] US Patents 5,517,303 (May 14, 1996) ,5,012,088 (April 30,1991) and 5,094,534
(March 10, 1992)
Fall 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
79
BOOK REVIEW
STORM WARNING: THE STORY OF A KILLER TORNADO,
by Nancy Mathis (Touchstone, 2007), 230 pp.
Reviewer: A1 Teich
Director, Science and Policy Programs
American Association for the Advancement of Science
On May 4, 2007 an F5 tornado made a direct hit on the town of
Greensburg, Kansas. Carrying winds in excess of 200 mph, the huge storm
virtually leveled the town of 1,500. All of the town’s churches were
destroyed, as was every business on Main Street and most of the town’s
homes. Despite the devastation, only ten people were killed - a fact that
media reports called a miracle.
A miracle? Certainly in comparison to past years it would seem to
be that. Sixty years earlier, on April 9, 1947, a powerful tornado hit
Woodward, Oklahoma, leveling most of its structures and killing 107 of
its residents. In all, that year tornadoes killed 306 people in the United
States. In 1925, a huge storm swept through Missouri, Southern Illinois,
and Indiana, killing 695 people in a three and a half hour rampage.
Twisters that killed 100 or more people were not uncommon in the 1940s
and 50s.
Since the mid-20^^ Century, despite the growth in the U.S.
population, the number of people killed by tornadoes has declined
dramatically. Currently, the average number of tornado deaths per year is
around 50. Many factors have contributed to this decline: advances in
meteorological research and computer modeling of weather systems,
broad availability of Doppler radar, improved responses and better
warnings on the part of government authorities as well as the media, and
citizen education. Storm Warning: The Story of a Killer Tornado brings
the story of these developments to life by focusing on the individuals
involved - researchers like Ted Fujita, a native of Japan whose
contributions to the understanding of severe storms are legendary and who
devised the scale of tornado intensity that bears his name and is still in use
today (the “F” numbers); as well as storm chasers; staff of the National
Weather Service; TV weather forecasters, including Gary England of
KWTV, Channel 9 in Oklahoma City; and local government officials.
Fall 2007
80
There is no shortage of heroes in Storm Warning, but there are also
goats. The U.S. Signal Corps, precursor of the Weather Bureau (as the
National Weather Service was called until 1967), reportedly banned the
use of the term “tornado” in its forecasts in 1887 because of concerns
about the uncertainties in its predictions. The Weather Bureau completely
failed to forecast the 1925 storm that killed 695 people and for years
thereafter, writes author Nancy Mathis, “the only warning was whatever
citizens saw coming at them.” Although officials denied in 1950 that they
had a policy of banning the word “tornado” from its weather predictions, it
was not until several years later that the Bureau began to actually issue
tornado forecasts.
Interwoven with the history of tornado research and forecasting are
moving and often heart-wrenching stories of the victims of tornadoes,
some who survived their fury and some who did not. Mathis, a native of
Oklahoma - the heart of “tornado alley” - now living in the Washington,
D.C., area, draws on her skills as a journalist (she was a reporter in Tulsa
and covered Congress and the Clinton White House for the Houston
Chronicle) to provide vivid accounts of their experiences. The progress
that has been made in understanding and forecasting tornadoes and
warning citizens over the past 60 years is brought home in her descriptions
of two tornado outbreaks - the one in 1947 that leveled Woodward after
first hitting Shattuck, Oklahoma, in which the only alarms came from rural
telephone operators calling one another to report approaching black
clouds, and another in 1999, described as “the biggest outbreak of
supercells and . . .violent tornadoes in the history of Oklahoma.” The latter
was modeled, tracked, chased, and timely warnings were broadcast
throughout the affected areas. Mathis gives us a minute-by-minute account
through the eyes of TV weathermen, storm chasers, and National Weather
Service forecasters, as well storm victims. The contrast is striking.
Storm Warning is a melange. The book is part science, part history
of science, part adventure story, and part human tragedy. It succeeds to
varying degrees at all of these, although in jumping from one element, one
story, and one perspective to another between and sometimes within
chapters, it sometimes becomes a bit difficult to follow. This might be less
of a problem if the book had an index, which unfortunately it lacks. In all,
however, this is an engaging book, one that describes well the human side
of a vitally important science and its interactions with government, the
media, and ordinary citizens.
Washington Academy of Sciences
81
THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON
SELECTED MINUTES, 2006-2007
THOUGHT TO BE THE OLDEST SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY in Washington,
the Philosophical Society grew out of regular meetings held in the home
of Joseph Henry, in the middle of the 19 Century, for the free exchange
of views and information among those interested in science. The Society
was formally founded in 1871; in the following decades it helped in the
establishment of more specialized scientific societies — the
Anthropological Society in 1879, the Biological Society in 1880, and the
Chemical Society in 1884. It was also one of eight scientific societies that
sponsored the establishment of the Washington Academy of Sciences.
Since its formation in 1871 there have been 2,222 meetings of the
Philosophical Society. The Society carefully preserves many of the
traditions and rituals developed over 136 years. For example, members,
guests, and lecturers are always addressed as “Mr.” or “Ms”, never as
“Dr.” One tradition has changed; for several decades women have taken
active leadership roles in the Society.
Meetings are held usually every other Friday from October through
May, in the John Wesley Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club, 2170
Florida Avenue NW. Each meeting features a distinguished lecturer from
the large and diverse scientific community of Washington. All meetings
are open to the public and are free; visitors are cordially invited to stay for
the social hour after the meeting. For further information go to
www.philsoc.org.
At each meeting the Minutes of the preceding meeting are read by
the Recording Secretary. They always include a pithy summary of that
evening’s lecture and discussion. For the information and enjoyment of
our readers, and with the permission of the lecturers, the WAS Journal
from time to time prints selected Minutes. We offer our thanks to the
Philosophical Society’s Recording Secretary, Ron Hietala.
Fall 2007
82
Minutes of the 2,200**^ Meeting, January 20, 2006
Mr. Bhakta Rath: Frozen Clean Energy from the Sea
President William Saalbach called the 2,200^*^ meeting to order at 8:18
pm January 20, 2006. The minutes of the 2,198^^ meeting were read and
approved.
Mr. Saalbach then introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr. Bhakta
Rath of the Naval Research Laboratory. Mr. Rath spoke on “An
Abundance of Frozen Clean Energy from the Sea.”
Mr. Rath said he was pleased with the opportunity to discuss this
extremely important issue. He began by discussing needs and the
alternatives.
The world currently uses about 13 terawatts of energy. The largest
part of it comes from oil, next coal, then natural gas. Nuclear fission is a
distant fourth, hydro a very distant fifth, and sources such as solar and
wind are nominal.
He showed a curve of oil production in the lower 48 states. It peaked
in 1970. It has declined substantially and is now under one/half its peak.
This is called the Hubbert peak, after geophysicist M. King Hubbert.
Though controversial, the prediction he made has proved fairly accurate.
The world production peak is harder to pin down. The United States
Geological Survey predicts 2010 is when it will peak and that by 2050 it
will be a small fraction of what it will be in 2010. He quoted a president of
ExxonMobil who said that by 2015 the world needs to find eight gallons
of new oil production for each one used today.
Of natural gas, 72% of reserves are in the Middle East. In 1980, 4%
of our natural gas was imported, in ‘98, 14%, and in 2003, 20% was
imported.
Some hope hydrogen will replace other fuels. Dr. Rath said hydrogen
use faces enormous technological challenges. They include how to
produce it, how to distribute it, how to store it, how to convert it to
electricity, how to contain it for end use, and how to detect it. It is difficult
to detect, notoriously leak-prone, and very dangerous. It has a ratio of
energy to mass that is only 1/13 that of gasoline. Moreover, all means of
producing it use fuel.
Wind energy requires large windmills located where there is good
wind. The wind, unfortunately, happens to be in the part of the country
where there are the fewest people. Millions of windmills would be
Washington Academy of Sciences
83
required and the transfer cable could cost $79, 000/km.
Tidal power is another possibility, and it would have a side benefit,
reduction of coastal flooding. There are not very many sites that are
suitable, however, and the transport of the energy would again be a major
problem.
A gallon of liquid fuel can be produced from 24 pounds of coal. This,
actually, is what Germany did during World War II, when they lost access
to the North African oil fields.
The U.S. Navy uses 40 million barrels of oil a year. To produce that
from coal would require mining 10 billion tons a year. This would involve
problems of transportation and disposal of solid waste and carbon dioxide.
So the alternatives all have problems - not enough, land use, cost,
safety, pollution, national security, and so on. Hydrogen cannot be used in
planes, although he did show a whimsical concept of a pregnant-looking
airliner with a big bulge of extra fuselage for hydrogen.
Then, turning to his main point, he showed an enticing picture of
something that looked like burning ice. This was a picture of a methane
hydrate crystal, giving off methane which burned readily as a gas.
Incidentally, it yields less CO2 than any other fossil fuel.
More than half of the organic carbon in the earth’s crust is in the form
of gas hydrates, on and offshore, he estimated. These nice little rocks are
called clathrates.
He presented distributions of pressure and temperature that showed
the depths and temperatures where these clathrates exist, which he called
the hydrate stability zone.
He showed a map of where they have been located so far. The United
States appears to be lucky again. It seems there is an abundance of them
around Alaska, off California, and in the Gulf of Mexico, and even a fair
amount of the stuff off the east coast. There appears to be a great deal of it
elsewhere in the world, also.
The most important sources of data have been seismic studies. There
have also been geochemical studies, electrographic, heat flow, micro- and
macro-biology, and drilling studies.
There are three possible ways to harvest it. One would be to pump the
gas out of the substrates. Another would be to inject steam into the
substrates to release the gas. Another would be to inject methanol into the
substrates to release the gas. There are places where it is bubbling off
naturally. Bubbles on the surface of the ocean can be seen, and there are
craters in the ocean floor resulting from gasification.
Research challenges remain. They include construction of a collection
Fall 2007
84
system to capture the gas once it is produced down there.
Mr. Rath offered to answer questions. He was asked what would be
the cost to a million BTU. He wasn’t sure. There are some factors yet to
be determined, such as working on the continental margins and the
problem of deep and horizontal drilling.
Several questions related to why no action has been taken, no
research funding from Congress or development or exploration by big
energy companies. Mr. Rath, a scientist, said Congress is beyond his
understanding. He and his staff have informed Congressional staff of these
facts. He spoke of the problems related to collaborative research between
agencies. He said that high fuel prices are not necessarily a problem for
big energy companies.
People brought up some energy alternatives he had not mentioned,
such as tar sands and shale oil. He acknowledged these as having
potential, but they put a heavy burden on the atmosphere. They also
require great amounts of water, and particularly for shale oil, which is
located where there is little water.
After the talk, Mr. Saalbach announced the next meeting. He made
the usual housekeeping announcements. He invited guests to consider
joining the Society. Finally, he adjourned the 2,200^^ meeting at 9:50 pm
to the social hour.
The weather: Rather clear, perhaps 1 0% coverage by wispy clouds.
The temperature: 8^
Attendance: 46
Minutes of the 2206**" Meeting, April 21, 2006
Mr. Michael van Woert: Art Adventure and Discovery Down Under
President William Saalbach called the 2,206‘^ meeting to order at
8:16 pm April 21, 2006. The minutes of the 2,205*^ meeting were read and
approved.
Mr. Saalbach then introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr
Michael Van Woert of the National Science Foundation. Mr. Van Woert
has had the opportunity to make a number of research excursions to the
Antarctic Continent. He spoke on “Art, Adventure, and Discovery Down
Under.”
Mr. Van Woert said he wanted to tell us of some of the challenges of
polar research and put it in contrast with the challenges faced by the early
explorers. He said it is a fascinating place, it is still a frontier, and is a
Washington Academy of Sciences
85
wonderful place to visit for anyone who is interested in beauty and
adventure.
Antarctica is vast, about 1.5 times the size of the United States. It is
also high, in many places above 10,000 feet above sea level. In the
summer, the temperatures get up to right around freezing. In the winter,
they reach 1 10 degrees Fahrenheit below 0.
The trip there by sea from Christchurch is not for the faint of heart.
Dr. Van Woert saw waves 60 feet high.
Now you can go by airplane. The trip is made by several cargo
planes; the work horse of the group is the C-130, a propeller plane. There
is no first class service. There are no windows and no peanuts. Passengers
are given a sack lunch and strapped in for eight hours.
McMurdo Station looks something like a frontier town. It looked
like it had perhaps ten rugged roads and 50 utilitarian buildings.
Near McMurdo Sound, at Terra Nova Bay, is where Robert Scott’s
Northern Party was marooned through a winter. They spent eight months
in a cave, eating seal and penguin meat. Then they walked to McMurdo
Sound. Scott, a scientist, kept a diary on his trek to the South Pole.
Having walked as far as he could, he wrote his last entry, “It seems a pity,
but I do not think I can write more.”
The science chief on Scott’s trip was Edward Wilson. Wilson was a
very good amateur painter, and he made many very beautiful watercolor
pictures. Dr. Van Woert showed samples.
There are about one million square miles of ice in the Antarctic in
the summer. The high plateaus cool by radiation. Heavy, cold air comes
down off the high plateaus at up to 1 20 miles an hour. It freezes sea water
down to about seven feet. The ice is broken up and blown out to sea by the
winds. Then it drifts back and is frozen in place. This process expands the
ice to about nine million square miles in the winter.
He described a study by a fishery biologist who simply dragged nets
from a ship. He hauled up the nets and dumped the contents on the deck.
This study yielded the discovery of two new species of fish. This, he said,
brings home how little is known about Antarctica, even today.
Much new knowledge of the continent is coming from NASA
satellites. He discussed some satellite discoveries of phytoplankton and
diatoms in the water and ice.
Most of the work down there is done from November to February,
the “warm” months.
Fall 2007
86
On a holiday they went out on the ice to play. They had a barbecue
and took pictures of penguins from three feet. There are 17 varieties of
penguins down there, but only four of them actually breed in Antarctica.
He showed picmres of the Ross Ice Shelf It is perfectly flat and
stretches for hundreds of miles. Occasionally pieces break off and float
away. This is responsible for some of the icebergs we hear about on the
evening news. In places the edge of the shelf is 50 feet high.
The Larsen B Ice Shelf was an enormous structure that modelers
said was too thick to melt. A few years ago the temperature went up just a
little. The surface melted and produced small crevasses and water started
flowing in the crevasses. In just a few months, the whole thing was broken
up and shattered. This is a great example of science missing some key
elements.
He showed some picmres of Scott Hut. a building set up by Robert
Scott in 1911. Abandoned in 1913, it still contains cans of provisions left
there by Mr. Scott. The building and its contents were preserv ed by the
cold. Things do not age and wear in that climate like they do in warmer
places.
After the talk. Dr. Van Woert offered to answer questions.
One person asked about lakes under the surface. Dr. Van Woert said
they do exist and observ ed that the Russians were about to drill into Lake
Vostok. the largest such lake to take samples. These lakes are believed to
be completely isolated. There is concern within the scientific community
about maintaining their integrity, but there is also interest in learning
about their biology, chemistrv^ and oceanography.
To another question, he informed us that the energy used down there
is primarily fuel oil. There was once a nuclear reactor there, but not
recently. Someone asked about mining, but he doubted that the technology
exists to do it profitably in that environment.
He also observ ed that agriculmre down there is “hard.” Biology, he
said, is funny. It goes from phytoplankton to whales. Historically, there
were no people in Antarctica. The only bare land with grass is near Palmer
Station and only in the summer.
He was asked about the effects of global warming. He observ ed that
there has been a lot of calving recently, but the ice shelf has been so far
north that the calving has been, in some respects, not unexpected.
Asked about how much of the continent is on land and how much on
water, he showed on a map that the whole western shelf is on water. It
looked like about a quarter of the area.
Washington Academy of Sciences
87
Someone asked if they are picking up any change in the biomass. He
answered that the only way to tell would be data from satellites, and that
will likely take ten to 40 years of observations.
There have been national land claims on Antarctica, but the claims
have been put abeyance as part of ratifying the Antarctic Treaty. This is a
gold-standard for international governance and everyone works at making
this a success.
After the discussion, Mr. Saalbach presented Dr. Van Woert a plaque
commemorating the occasion. Mr. Saalbach announced the next lecture,
the Joseph Henry Lecture, and encouraged support of the society through
membership and contributions. He invited everyone to stay for the social
hour. Finally, he adjourned the 2,206^^ meeting at 9:43 pm.
The weather: Cool and moist.
The temperature: 14^
Attendance: 39
Minutes of the 2,208**' Meeting, September 15, 2006
Mr. Richard Hodes: Growing Older — Challenges
And Opportunities in Aging
President William Saalbach called the 2,208**' meeting to order at 8:16
pm September 15, 2006 in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club.
The recording secretary read the minutes of the 2,206**^ meeting. They
were approved after a short discussion.
Mr. Saalbach introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr. Richard
Hodes, director of the National Institute on Aging of the National
Institutes of Health. Mr. Hodes spoke on the topic. Growing Older -
Challenges and Opportunities in Aging.
Aging research has implications for all of us, Mr. Hodes began. He
pointed out that in 1900 life expectancy in the U.S. was in the late 40’s.
By 1950, the life expectancy of women had reached 70. By 2000, the life
expectancy of men reached about 75 and for women the early 80’s. Even
more dramatic is the increase in the number of people over 85. In 1940,
they represented thin red lines on Mr. Hodes ’s chart; now they are thick
red lines. The increase in the number of the oldest people will have great
implications in many areas.
NIA was formed in 1974 with a very broad mission, to support and
conduct research on aging, to train and develop research scientists and
provide research resources, and to disseminate information on health and
research advances. His talk covered three general areas within the NIA
Fall 2007
88
research portfolio, biology of aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and reducing
disabilities associated with aging.
About aging, he said there are many theories, including DNA damage,
stress response, protein modification, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell
senescence, and gene expression. Studies indicate genetic factors account
for about 30 % of the variation in aging and environmental factors about
70%. A study of nematodes indicated that those with a mutation in the age
gene live longer than others, 40-some days instead of 20-some days. Mice
on restricted calorie diets live longer. Their survival curve plunges to 0 at
57 months, for the control it plunges to 0 at 40 months.
For humans, the probability of survival to 100 is highly related to
having a sibling who did. People over 100 are the fastest growing segment
of the population.
Someone asked if longevity is related to the X chromosome. This is
not known, he said, but it is known that it is not so in all species.
The probability of having Alzheimer’s Disease increases rapidly with
age. Among those 65 - 74, it is 3%, for 75 - 84 it is 19%, and for those
over 85, it is 47%. There are 4.5 million AD patients now, and the trends
point to 14 million by 2050.
Does maintaining mental activity reduce it? Yes, but the question is,
why. It could be those people have a greater reserve of intellectual ability
so it takes longer for AD to manifest. There is, however, a detectable rate
of generating new neurons in the brain, even in adulthood, and it’s
possible that a history of generating neurons produces a beneficial effect.
They now divide people into four AD categories: normal, pre-
symptomatic, mild cognitive impairment, and finally, AD. This provides a
better basis for intervention.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of amyloid deposits in
AD versus normal people shows stark differences. PET scans can provide
quantitative information on amyloid deposits in living subjects.
Pseudocolor imaging sharply enhances those differences.
How do plaques form? Beta amyloid spans the membrane. Beta
secretase and Gamma secretase can cut the protein. When they clip at two
points, they produce an opening that is prone to produce the beta amyloid
plaque.
There are also studies being done on early onset familial AD, with
onsets from the 30’s to the 50’s. Families usually know they have this
variety. It has corollaries in chemistry, in the secretases. It is found in
animals as well as humans; it is associated with memory loss in mice.
Washington Academy of Sciences
89
Correlates of AD include age, head injury, high blood pressure,
cholesterol, homocysteine, diet (fat), education/brain reserve/occupation,
exercise and social networks. Estrogen is now believed not to have a
beneficial effect, although a few years ago it was thought that it did.
Donepezil does delay the progression from moderate cognitive
dysfunction to AD. It is highly significant, but the effect only holds for the
first 12 months.
The statin drugs appear to reduce the prevalence of AD substantially.
Lovastatin reduced it by 60 percent and prevastatin almost as much. They
also work in mice and dogs.
He described a study called the Nun Study. Nuns and some men in
various orders committed themselves to the study and donated their brains
for study after death. Nuns graded on how much plaque they had varied
enormously in how much dementia they had. What explained it was
vascular disease. It seemed that affecting circulation in brain moderated
effect of plaques.
He mentioned that NIA is currently recruiting subjects for clinical
trials involving a number of potential therapies. Interested parties can find
relevant information at www.nia.nih.gov.
Disability among older Americans has been reduced. The raw number
has gone up, but the number relative to the number in the age group is
74% of what it would have been without the decrease. This could be a
fragile phenomenon, though, because disability rates in younger groups
have actually increased slightly, largely because of obesity.
A study with surprising revelations was one to compare the drug,
Metformin, with a placebo and a lifestyle (diet and exercise) regimen.
Metformin was quite effective, reducing diabetes by about 40% among
people age 25 - 49. However, diet and exercise was equally effective.
Furthermore, as age increased. Metformin was less effective and diet and
exercise more. Among people over 60 Metformin had no effect and
lifestyle reduced diabetes by 71%.
In the question and answer period. Dr. Hodes refined his analyses of
some of the studies discussed. He pointed out that the participants in the
nun study were at different locations and most likely did not have the
same diet. Also, he reported that the study found that complexity of syntax
in writing samples from subjects’ early years was associated with
Alzheimer’s. About children of older parents living longer, he said that
could be because the parents had better genes which enabled them to have
children at an older age.
Fall 2007
90
Mr. Saalbach thanked our speaker and presented a plaque
commemorating the event. He made the parking announcement,
announced the next meeting, and invited ever\'one to stay for the social
hour.
Finally, he adjourned the 2208^ meeting at 9:48 pm to the social
hour.
Attendance: 66
Temperamre: 18^
The Weather: Cool and mild
.Minutes of the 2,209^^ Meeting, September 29, 2006
>Ir. G. Peter Nanos: What is Science, and
Why do We Really Care?
President William Saalbach called the 2.209* meeting to order at 8:17
p.m. on September 29, 2006 in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos
Club.
The recording secretaiy read the minutes of the 2.208* meeting and
they were approved.
Mr. Saalbach introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr. G. Peter
Xanos of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Mr. Nanos spoke on the
topic, WTiat is Science and WTiy Do We Really Care?
Mr. Nanos welcomed the opportunity’ to speak on a veiy important
subject. He said he was glad to be talking to the Philosophical Societ>’,
which, after the recent incidents at Columbia may represent one of the last
bastions of civil discourse in the countiy.
Mr. Nanos wanted to start from the basics, because if there are
problems with science in this country’, they are likely to stem from a
misunderstanding of what science is. Science is not technolog>’. It is a
philosophy of inquiry^ It is based upon examination, theoretical posmlate.
and empirical verification. Science as a body does not exist without
experimentation. Theory’ that does not admit of test is not scientific theory’.
String theory’ has this problem. String theorists have a lot of fun with their
discussions, but ha\’e yet to push the envelope of knowledge forward.
String theory’N propositions are not testable. Similarly, intelligent design,
because it can't be verified, it is not a scientific theory’.
He read recently about an agency “p^o^’iding funding" for science in
the country’. He took issue with that construction. They are not Mst
Washington Academy of Sciences
91
throwing money at science, they provide funding to test propositions that
push forward the body of knowledge of mankind.
Young people have to understand science, know the methods, to know
what it is about. Mr. Nanos, growing up in the 20*^ century, believed that
the U.S. was the center of science and always would be. Before the war,
however, most discoveries were being made overseas. After the war, with
Germany and Japan decimated, the center moved here.
Our university system also became pre-eminent after the war. Almost
all technological innovation in the country comes from universities. The
Hewlett-Packard garage was at Stanford. Bill Gates was a college dropout.
Now, however, we are seeing many trained young scientists go
overseas to work. Foreign students were coming to major in science and
staying. Now they are coming, studying, then going home. China is
establishing world-class universities with graduates from America.
If we want to stay competitive, we have to think about this as a public
issue. We should demand that the scientific part of education of young
people be given just as much credence as the literary part.
If someone says that one who has not read Shakespeare is not
educated, people believe it. People think, however, that it is acceptable if
someone does not understand the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Changing this starts with the fundamentals. Secondly, we have to
make scientific careers attractive. We have to give credence and rewards
to those giving their lives to science.
Science will go on in the world, he said, but will the U.S. be able to
partake of it?
Mr. Nanos recalled a television show called “Our Friend the Atom”
and similar shows. “The Atom” was on in prime time on a major network.
He is somewhat at a loss as to how to capture the imagination of and
create excitement among young people today.
He is doing his part. He teaches modem physics at a community
college. He tries to demystify science, and, more importantly, demystify
scientists.
For example he described what Max Planck did as “fiddled around
with the equation until it fit the data.” Then the equation was picked up by
Einstein and used to explain the photoelectric effect. Later it became the
foundation for quantum mechanics. These were, he said, just a group of
real people who were able to deal with scientific inquiry in a way that
made sense.
He offered to answer questions.
Fall 2007
92
One questioner commented on the disappointment when science was
funded at universities by the government. This produced a surplus of
scientists. There were few opportunities for graduates in industry, because
industry works short-term and science is long-term. Mr. Nanos added
that, as a result of funding science at universities, industry turned to
universities for that resource. Now, however, universities are waking up to
the value of intellectual property and are unwilling to relinquish the rights.
As a result, industries are taking the research overseas.
Another questioner pointed out, using her own experience as an
example, how personal choices and influences of particular times affect
choices of what they study. Mr. Nanos observed that people should be
encouraged to follow their talents and to stretch themselves as much as
they can.
Another questioner asked his opinion on a science court or similar
institution to resolve issues and thereby force resolution of matters and
permit more progress. Mr. Nanos did not answer directly, but he did
compare Oppenheimer and Heisenberg. We were lucky to have
Oppenheimer, he said, and related how the more authoritarian Heisenberg
took as truth a major error about the critical mass, an error from which
they never recovered.
Responding to another question, Mr. Nanos observed that none of the
universities are independent and therefore cannot operate as businesses.
He also clarified that he does not favor reducing support for the
humanities.
Mr. Saalbach thanked our speaker and presented a plaque
commemorating the event. He announced the next meeting. He made a
pitch for support of the Society, especially through sponsored lectures. He
made the parking announcement and invited everyone to stay for the
social hour. Finally, at 9:20 pm, he adjourned the 2,209^^^ meeting.
Attendance: 52
The weather: still cloudy, but clearing after a day of rain from a
nor’easter
The temperature: 16^
Washington Academy of Sciences
93
Minutes of the 2,21 1“" Meeting, November 3, 2006
Ms Julie Palais: Unraveling the Secrets of the Polar Ice Shield
President William Saalbach called the 2,21 1^*’ meeting to order at 8:18
pm November 3, 2006, in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club. The
recording secretary read the minutes of the 2,210^*^ meeting and they were
approved.
Mr. Saalbach introduced the speaker of the evening, Ms. Julie Palais,
of the Office of Polar Programs of the National Science Foundation.
Palais, who is in charge of the Antarctic Glaciology Program, spoke on the
topic, “Unraveling the Secrets of the Polar lee Sheets, A Glaciological
Perspective.”
The Antarctic, Ms Palais began, is the coldest, windiest, highest, driest
continent on earth. It is covered by an ice sheet of 29 million cubic
kilometers, about the size of the U.S. and Mexico. There are ice-free
coastal areas called the Dry Valleys near McMurdo Sound, where the
main U.S. Station sits.
There are also stations at the South Pole and one called Palmer
Station. The average temperature is -56^. In the summer, it gets as high as
0 at the Pole and as high as 50*" at McMurdo Sound.
The exciting thing about the WAIS (Western Antarctic Ice Sheet)
Divide ice core is that the high accumulation rate will provide detailed
resolution so they can look at things like greenhouse gases. They hope to
be able to determine whether, for example, greenhouse gases rose in the
atmosphere before the climate change or vice versa.
They use the stable-isotope content of the ice, which is a proxy for the
temperature. The greenhouse gases, methane and C02, correlate highly
with the temperature. She said it seems obvious that there may be a causal
relationship, but the question is: Which comes first?
Biology in ice cores has generally been an afterthought. Now they
include biologists in the projects from the beginning.
One ice core, the EPICA ice core drilled at Dome C, goes back almost
a million years.
She described the organizations that provide support for Antarctic
research, including the National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL), NICL-
Science Management Office (NICL-SMO), Antarctic Glaciological Data
Center (AGDC), lee Core Drilling Service (ICDS). This last is located at
the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Fall 2007
94
With these resources, they plan to learn more about five subjects:
climate forcing by greenhouse gases, the role of Antarctica in abrupt
climate change, the relationship among northern, tropical, and southern
climates, the stability of the West Antarctic ice sheet, and the biological
signals contained in deep ice cores.
One dramatic finding from ice cores: climate change can be quite
abrupt. U.S. -European projects in Greenland in the 1989-94 period pulled
long cores that revealed that in the warming period about 11,500 years
ago, temperatures rose 10^ in a very short period. Detailed analysis
established that most of that change happened in less than ten years! This
lends great interest to some of the Antarctic research now beginning. The
WAIS Divide ice core will provide Antarctic records of environmental
change with the highest possible time resolution for the last 100,000 years,
and will be the Southern Hemispheric equivalent of the Greenland studies.
These studies may determine whether greenhouse gases followed or
preceded climate change.
She described a variety of exploration now ongoing that goes back to
the early days, traveling the continent on the ground - “traverses.” The
research data comes from snow pits, ice cores, and glaciological analysis
to interpret ice core data. Starting in about week, a group was to traverse
from Taylor Dome to the South Pole.
She described their “high-risk/high-impacf ’ work on icebergs and ice
shelves. The sudden breakup of the Larsen B ice shelf in the Antarctic
Peninsula and the sudden release of B-15 from the Ross Ice Shelf in
March, 2000, both produced high interest in the press. They are now
conducting collaborative research on the world’s largest icebergs. Exciting
results featured recently in the media linked a storm in the Gulf of Alaska
to iceberg calving in Antarctica. They are now looking for implications for
future global warming and for ice sheet changes.
The Larsen B Ice Shelf breakup was quite dramatic. A large structure
which had been stable for a long time, it disintegrated totally between
January 30 and March 4, 2002. Although sea level rise comes only from
ice coming off land, not off the sea, where the ice shelf was located, the
ice shelves do restrain the flow of glaciers that feed into them.
New methods on the horizon being applied to ice research include
what they call “Fastdrill” and “LARA.” Fastdrill will enable them to drill
rapidly through the ice, get quickly down to the base, put instruments
down and study heat flow. LARA, long-range aircraft for research in
Antarctica, will enable them to fly over vast ice sheets and take
measurements.
Washington Academy of Sciences
95
Speaking of horizons, she ended with a spectacular picture of the
horizon of Antarctica from just over the lip of the Ross Ice Shelf, where
the edge rises vertically out of the sea.
Then she spoke a little about her personal experiences. She went first
in 1978 as a graduate student. They went to New Zealand where people
pick up plenty of mittens, wool socks, and long underwear. They get on a
plane that looks like a giant, pregnant guppy. The first views of the ice are
very impressive. McMurdo is on Ross Island and is not actually part of the
continent. McMurdo Station is located on Hut Point Peninsula. She
showed pictures of the Dry Valleys and of Scott’s Discovery Hut, which
has sat there, unchanged, in a deep freeze since Scott left it. She showed a
picture of the South Pole, which the lucky members and guests of the
2,211 now know looks just like a barber pole. The ice over the pole
moves about 1 0 meters a year, so they move the candy-stripe marker every
year. The big planes land on skis at the Pole. The planes are owned by
NSF and the New York Air National Guard, and the Guard does all the
flying. She showed a picture of Sir Edmund Hillary chatting with people
at the South Pole, a picture of the dining hall, and mentioned that they just
keep the food out in the ambient temperature at field camps like the WAIS
Divide site.
She also showed pictures of Palais Glacier, named for her, and Colwell
Massif, named for former NSF Director Rita Colwell. She noted that the
clear skies down there are great for astronomy.
She offered to answer questions. In response, she made these points:
- She couldn’t say for sure whether it is a misuse of the data to say that
CO2 is causing the changes. The scientists want to see more data on the
question.
- Available data are not adequate to say whether Antarctica is growing
or shrinking.
- Clearly large volcanic eruptions such as the 1991 Pinatubo eruption
have major effects on climate and there is evidence as far away as the
polar regions of the volcano’s impact (in the form of impurities in the ice).
- The latest news about Lake Vostok is that the Russians are planning
to drill into it. Now more than 70 sub-ice lakes have been discovered.
- There’s a lot of excitement about the possibility of life in these lakes.
Mr. Saalbach announced the next meeting. He presented Ms Palais a
plaque commemorating the event. He made a pitch for support and
bragged on our exciting schedule of meetings. He made the parking
announcement. He invited everyone to stay for the social hour. Finally, he
adjourned the 2,21 1^*’ meeting at 9:41 pm to the social hour.
Fall 2007
96
Attendance: 58
Weather: crisp and clear
Temperature: 10^
Minutes of the 2,212*** Meeting, November 17, 2006
Mr. H. John Woof: Fifteen Years of Astounding Images
By the Hubble Space Telescope
President William Saalbach called the 2,212*** meeting to order at 8:17
pm November 17, 2006 in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club.
The recording secretary read the minutes of the 2,211*** meeting and they
were approved.
Mr. Saalbach introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr. H. John
Wood of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Mr. Wood, the lead
optics engineer of the Hubble Space Telescope Program, spoke on
“Fifteen Years of Astounding Images by the Hubble Space Telescope.”
Bom in Baltimore, Mr. Wood, at age eight, looked at the Moon
through the telescope of the Northwood Observatory. Now Baltimore has
become a rich center for astronomy.
When the first Hubble pictures came back John Mangus, then the man
in charge, was disappointed with the resolution. Mr. Mangus, Mr. Woods’
boss, was assigned to figure out what the problem was. Mr. Wood, as a
good performance reward, was given the broken Hubble.
The first guess about the problem was that a mirror was not polished
smoothly. It turned out the mirror was very smooth, but it was made with
the wrong prescription. On the first service trip up to Hubble, they
installed corrective mirrors. The shape had to be 2.2 microns from the tme
at the edge, and this correction had to be put into a mirror the size of a
dime.
Mr. Wood watches the Shuttle go up from Bowie. It goes up fast at
first to get out of the atmosphere. Five minutes after launch, he can look
from Bowie to the southeast and see it low in the sky.
He showed pictures of servicing mission 3B, when they added some
new solar panels and the Advanced Camera for Surveys and removed the
Faint Object Camera. We learned that space walks are short because
people’s hands get tired in the pressurized gloves, even though the 800
pound Advanced Camera for Surveys could be moved with one’s
fingertips.
Washington Academy of Sciences
97
He showed pictures of Mars. All the geographical features were in
great detail. The Mars Polar Cap is actually condensed CO2. For some
reason, the southern hemisphere of Mars is much more pockmarked by
craters than the north.
There was a really nice, detailed picture of Jupiter. One precise, dark
spot was the shadow of Jupiter’s moon, lo. Jupiter radiates 2.5 times the
energy it absorbs from the Sun. They think it has a core of liquid metallic
hydrogen.
Pictures of Gliese 220B, a brown dwarf, from Mount Palomar and
Hubble showed the advantage of Hubble. The Mount Palomar image
showed a big blob with a little blob on the side. The Hubble image showed
the big blob and the little blob in much sharper relief. There was a picture
of Betelgeuse, a star about six times the size of earth’s orbit. Even
Jupiter’s orbit is smaller than Betelgeuse by about a third.
He showed a picture of the Orion Nebula, where 3000 stars are
currently emerging from the dust cloud. Stars also emerge from EGGs
(Evaporating Gaseous Globules).
In the Eagle Nebula, NASA found pillars of dust light years long. New
stars peek out from the pillars. Stars in the globular clusters are bom
together and may have common characteristics that differentiate them
from stars of other clusters. The energy from the new stars sculpts and
lights the dust, producing fantastic, eerie shapes. One pillar of dust in the
Eagle Nebula is 9.5 light years high, about twice the distance from Earth’s
Sun to the nearest star. The columns result when energy from the young
stars blows away the rest of the dust and leaves the columns.
He showed pictures of supernova remnants and observed that there
was a supernova in 1054, during the Norman Conquest. Both sides said
the supernova was a sign they were winning. You and I, he said, are made
out of material from a supernova: calcium, iron, carbon, and a lot of other
chemicals.
He said Andromeda is one of his favorite galaxies, but it is heading
our way and will probably eat the Milky Way for lunch one day.
Andromeda is the big Kahuna of our local group.
Vera Rubin, one of our previous speakers and members, discovered
that the rotation of Andromeda is not like planets. It is rotating really fast,
and even the stuff farther out from the center is rotating fast. This
discovery was a precursor to the discovery of dark matter.
Andromeda is so large it will fill your binoculars. Hubble was able to
get down to the nucleus of Andromeda. It’s a triple nucleus. The smaller
Fall 2007
98
ones are smaller galaxies that Andromeda has eaten on its way to getting
really big.
He showed a picture of The Mice, two spiral galaxies that interact.
When they get close, they eject arms toward each other.
He described gravitational lensing. This occurs when light from a
distant object passes a large mass like a galaxy. The gravitation of the
massive object bends the light rays and can produce a distorted or
transformed image of the object reflecting or emitting the light. It is an
interesting phenomenon, but the gravity is not a good lens.
He discussed the makeup of the Universe. It now appears it is about
2/3 dark energy and 1/3 dark matter. There is a smidgen, 4%, of free
hydrogen and an even smaller part, 2%, consists of stars.
A study hot off the press, released the day before, indicated there is a
supernova in the center of each of the extremely distant galaxies. These
are galaxies from nine billion years ago, and the most distant supernovas
ever observed.
He closed with a beautiful composite picture of Earth from space. He
also observed that new technology has enhanced our understanding of the
Universe.
He invited questions.
Does the repulsive force change over time? Indications are that it does
not, he said. While it is audacious to think that physics may be constant
for 9 billion years that does appear to be the case.
In answer to questions, he discussed means of determining distance,
the demotion of Pluto from planet rank, and some of the Hubble
discoveries. Hubble researchers have discovered the greatest number of
other planets. Other discoveries he credits to Hubble: That dark energy
permeates the entire universe, the energy of the vacuum, the importance of
supernovas, and extra solar planets.
Hubble is as close to earth as it is because it needs to be serviced. The
next one, the James Webb, will be further out.
Mr. Saalbach presented Mr. Wood a plaque commemorating the event.
He announced the next meeting. He made a pitch for support of the
Society. He made the parking announcement.
Mr. Saalbach introduced Robert Hershey, chairperson of the
nominating committee. Mr. Hershey announced the committee’s slate of
office candidates and invited nominations from the floor.
Finally, Mr. Saalbach invited everyone to stay for the social hour and
adjourned the 2,212th meeting at 9:52 pm.
Washington Academy of Sciences
99
Attendance: 77
Weather: Cool
Temperature: 9^
Minutes of the 2,214“" Meeting, December 15, 2006
Mr. Mihail Roco: Nanotechnology
President William Saalbach called the 2,214^*" meeting to order at 8:18
p.m. December 15, 2006, in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club.
The recording secretary read the minutes of the 2,213^^ meeting and they
were approved.
Mr. Saalbach introduced Mihail Roco of the National Science
Foundation. Mr. Roco, who is NSF’s senior advisor for nanotechnology,
spoke on “Nanotechnolgy.”
Five years ago, Mr. Roco began, nanotechnology engendered general
disbelief Now, there is general concern about who will be the leader in
the field.
Nanotechnology means control and restructuring of matter at
dimensions of roughly 1-100 nanometers. At this level of matter, new
phenomena enable new applications
The new phenomena at nanoscale include quantum effects, large
surface area, confinement, larger reactivity, and many others. There may
be many ways to exploit them. For example, the surfaces of membranes
with aligned carbon nanotubes are almost friction-free. Water flows
through them at 100,000 times the expected speed.
At about 1 nanometer, direct observation of electron orbitals has been
achieved, which is useful in understanding molecular assembling. Also
molecular logic switches have been found.
In the 10-nanometer neighborhood, self-assembling quantum dots,
small pyramids of molecules, have been observed. These are potentially
useful for logic chips. Also at ten nanometers, the folding of proteins into
precise structures has been observed.
In the range of 1 0-200 nanometers, new materials of high strength and
low cost have been produced, potentially useful in such things as
automobile parts. Also, DNA-based nanoparticle building blocks have
been produced.
An interesting possibility is the construction of nanoscale electronic
circuits using self-assembling DNA synthetic strands and nanoparticles.
People also are working on chemistry to synthesize components of nano
machines to work on surfaces and be activated by external
Fall 2007
100
electromagnetic fields and light driven molecular motors. Papers on these
developments are available at w'wvv. nseresearch.org.
Humans, he obser\ed. live in the neighborhood of the meter. 10
meters is the limit of flight of satellites and 10"' is the largest known size.
10' meter is the lower limit of manufacmring today, and 10'"^ is the
smallest known size.
What is special about nanotechnolog>’? It reaches the basic level of
organization of atoms and molecules. It offers a broad technology
platform for industry’, medicine, and the environment, with great societal
implications. It has high purpose goals, including more basic science and
education, higher work efficiency, molecular medicine, and extending the
limits of sustainable development.
The societal implications include:
• increasing the knowledge base, that is, having a better
comprehension of nature and life;
• new technologies and products-it has been estimated that
products incorporating nanotechnolog\’ will, by 2015, be valued
at SI trillion;
• improved healthcare, increased life-span and improved quality’ of
life;
• sustainabilit\’ of agriculture, food, water, energ\’, materials, and
en\ ironment; for example by reducing energy used in lighting.
Mr. Roco sees four phases of nanotechnology’ in the 20 years
following 2000. In 2000 we entered the first, which involved passive
nanostructures such as coatings, nanoparticles, and nanostructured metals,
polymers, and ceramics. In 2005 began the phase of active nanostructures,
including transistors, amplifiers, targeted drugs, actuators, and adaptive
strucmres. Phase 3 he expects to begin about 2010 and to be the phase of
systems of nanosystems, with such things as guided assembling, 3D
networking, new hierarchical architectures, and robotics. Phase 4 will
involve molecular nanosystems, including molecular devices ‘by design.'
atomic design, and newly emerging functions.
For use in the human body, he anticipates sensors for monitoring,
localized drug deliveiy. neural stimulation, cardiac therapies, and artificial
organs. Within cells, he anticipates materials with better interactions with
cell materials and scaffolds for tissue engineering.
• Over 400 consumer products incorporated simple nanostructures in
2006. One example: glass for a beer bottle that will keep the beer
cold. In Beijing, the new Narional Opera Hall will have a glass
surface coated with photocatalytic nanoparticles that cause dirt
Washington Academy of Sdences
101
particles to lose cohesion. Auto companies hope to have a similar
feature for paint.
Nanotubes are already quite common. What they do well includes:
• tips for nanoprobes
• field emission devices
• transistors
• sport products - bats, sticks, seats, frames rackets, skis, and so on,
where they increase performance by 30 or 40 percent
• electromechanical actuators
• logic gates
• batteries
• gas storage matrices
He showed a picture of a perfectly formed diamond, a single crystal
2.5 mm high, formed by molecular control of chemical vapor deposition.
Other exciting things people are working on are:
• drugs that will, instead of distributing randomly, seek out problem
cells or structures and treat them;
• nanocars - devices of 2 by 3 nanometers that will move on a
surface, driven by light or heat powered nanomoters;
• simulated natural systems that will produce silk and cotton;
• self-assembling molecules, which might be useful in treating
neural disorders.
Japan, Europe, and the U.S. are all investing heavily in
nanotechnology. The U.S. leads in patents. The effort in China is showing
a dramatic upswing. U.S. government spending by various agencies
totaled $270 million in 2000 and grew to $1.3 billion by 2006, although
growth has moderated in the last few years.
There are already a number of communication efforts to reach students
with nanotechnology. Mr. Roco expects nanotechnology to have
fundamental effects on academia, including:
• putting fundamental concepts at the beginning in education;
• increasing opportunities for discovery and innovation;
• bringing disciplines together;
• nanoscale interdisciplinary laboratories;
• multidisciplinary and international planning and collaboration.
Similarly, he expects great effects in business, including:
• competitive advantage by improved products;
• new products (over half of chemical, electronic, and
pharmaceutical products will involve nanotechnology by 2015);
Fall 2007
102
• convergence with biomedical, electronics, and cognition;
• new business models with “horizontal” information flow, science
and technology clusters, and distributed production;
• global governance, strong collaboration and competition.
He offered to answer questions.
Someone raised a concern about nanoparticles and the immune
system.
“Good news and bad news,” he said. There are no reported immune
system responses to nanoparticles, and indeed there may be many similar
particles in nature. However, cosmetics are not regulated in any way, so
they may carry risks. Nanotubes do go into the brain, but so do other
products, such as brake dust. Nanotubes are eliminated from the body in
one hour.
Mr. Saalbach announced the next lecture, on “The Mystery of Iron,”
by William Saalbach. He reflected that the talk we had just heard, on
“Nanotechnology,” was the David Franklin Bleil lecture. He made the
parking announcement. He made a pitch for financial support of the
Society. Finally, at 9:25 pm, he adjourned the 2,214^^ meeting to the
annual business meeting.
Attendance: 63
Weather: Cool, breezy, relatively clear
Temperature: 7^
Minutes of the 2,218**^ Meeting, March 2, 2007
Mr. Thomas McCaskill: The Global Positioning System
President Ruth McDiarmid called the 2,218^^ meeting to order at 8:17
pm March 2, 2007, in the Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos Club. The
recording secretary read the minutes of the 2,217^^ meeting and they were
approved.
Ms. McDiarmid made announcements about membership, volunteer
help for the Society, and tax exempt contributions. She made the parking
announcement.
Ms. McDiarmid then introduced the speaker of the evening, Mr.
Thomas McCaskill, retired from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. Mr.
McCaskill spoke on “The Global Positioning System.”
Mr. McCaskill set out to tell us what the GPS is and how it works,
about NRL’s role in space, and about the revolutionary impact of GPS on
Washington Academy of Sciences
103
our nation and the world. The system enables people to determine position
instantaneously and speed nearly instantaneously. The system has, he said,
millions of civilian users, including the 911 emergency location function
for cell phones.
GPS is run by the Air Force for the Department of Defense. It was
designed primarily as a military system but is now available for civilian
use also.
He started with a slide showing four satellites, the names of which he
knew by heart. These were the first four that, back in 1977, proved the
concept would work.
Five clocks are needed to determine position and the clock offset of
the GPS receiver. The four satellite clocks are free running, but their times
are typically within several hundred microseconds of “GPS time.” Data
given in the navigation message for each satellite are used to correct for
the offset of each satellite clock with respect to GPS time and to compute
the position of the satellite, with a correction for the propagation time
delay for each of the satellites. The measurements used by the receiver are
the apparent time differences between the clock in the receiver and the
clocks in the satellites. These differences result from the distance between
each satellite and the receiver clock offset. The receiver clock is also free
running. Until it takes the different measurements, its variation from GPS
time is unknown. A constellation of 28 satellites circles the Earth in 12-
hour orbits and provides enough satellites to accurately solve for the four
unknowns at the location of any GPS receiver on Earth. The time-delay is
about 65 milliseconds for a satellite straight overhead and about 85
milliseconds for one on the horizon.
Passive ranging is fundamental to the system. Passive ranging means
that the distance from each satellite is determined without any
transmission from the receiver. The synchronization of the satellite clock
with the clock in the GPS receiver is what makes this possible. NRL
scientist Roger Easton originated and patented this concept that is used by
GPS.
There are different methods of getting the initial estimates of location
of the receiver and time for the receiver’s clock. One has the receiver
operator choose the nearest city from a list of 100 cities around the world.
A method Mr. McCaskill developed averages the vectors to all the
satellites detected by the receiver.
Two carrier frequencies are used to transmit from the satellites. The
timing information is broadcast using pseudo-random noise codes. These
codes, which are different for each satellite and orthogonal to each other.
Fall 2007
104
are used by the receiver to distinguish among the satellite signals. Mr.
McCaskill demonstrated this using volunteers vocalizing from different
parts of the room. We found we could distinguish among the voices, even
when several were sounding at once.
Time prevents a detailed review of the mathematics of the
determination of time and locations. However, it is a logically similar to
one of those puzzles about the age of children. If Adam is two years older
than Blake, Blake is twice as old as Carrie, and Carrie is 1/3 as old as
Adam, how old is Carrie? If you have enough information about the
differences, you can determine the ages of them all. In the GPS, location is
related to time differences from the satellites, so location can also be
determined.
Many people see GPS as a new and different thing. Mr. McCaskill
sees it as a result of a long history of the Naval Research Laboratory and
its role in work on navigation.
Navigation by time goes back a long time. He recalled the work of
John Harrison, the British man who invented a clock that would keep time
at sea accurately enough to use in determining longitude. That was in the
mid 1700’s. That type of device was used for 200 years until the
development of electronic clocks and atomic clocks in the mid 1900’s.
NRL took delivery of the first commercially produced cesium atomic
clock in 1955. In 1974 the first atomic clock orbited the Earth in a satellite
built by NRL.
NRL was established in 1923 on the recommendation of Thomas
Edison, whose statue stands at the entrance. It started with two divisions,
radio and sound. In 1998 it celebrated its 75^^ anniversary. Among its
contributions, it counted the Minitrack System (used to track Vanguard
satellites), the Vanguard program, the Navy Space Surveillance System,
the Timation Program, and the Global Positioning System.
After World War II, NRL participated in the V-2 research program at
the invitation of the U.S. Army. NRL designed 80 different scientific
experiments, with instrumentation that was placed into the nose cone of
the captured German rockets. These produced the first direct measurement
of atmospheric pressure above 18 miles, the first photos of Earth from 40,
70, and 101 miles up, the first photos of the ultraviolet solar spectrum
below 285 angstroms, the first detection of x rays from the Sun, and other
notable milestones. Those V-2 launches were the birth of space-based
astronomy and the Navy’s space program. NRL proceeded to develop its
own rockets, Mr. McCaskill said, “... when it became evident that the
supply of V-2 rockets would be exhausted.”
Washington Academy of Sciences
105
He turned to “war stories” about GPS. In Desert Storm (the first “Gulf
War”) troops were found using their own Visa cards to buy receivers for
about $3,500 because not enough military GPS receivers were available.
In WWII, less than 5% of bombs hit their targets. Now ships, aircraft,
tanks, and troops launch precision guided munitions and track their
positions precisely. We now see a possibility of wars fought with robots
rather than human beings.
In 2003, nine men were trapped in a mine in Pennsylvania for 77
hours. Rescue workers, using GPS, were able to drill a 6-inch air hole to
their location to keep them alive until a larger, 22-inch, shaft could be
drilled and a rescue capsule lowered.
There are many examples of GPS saving lives, not all of them
recounted in General Motors Onstar ads. Mr. McCaskill hopes he will live
long enough to ride in an automobile piloted by GPS.
He closed by saying that we have the most powerful nation on God’s
Earth. What the future will be depends on all of us working together.
In the question-and-answer session, he amplified that clock accuracy
is a basic requirement so that we were able to use GPS for a 1 80-day war.
So much military function depends on GPS to provide location ability
without a tracking system.
He stated that we could build automatic cars now. Robotic autos, he
“guaranteed,” would do better than 99% of all the drunks on the highway.
Asked if a quantum positioning system could make GPS more
accurate, he said he thought it would, but he wasn’t sure it would be cost-
effective. He did offer hope that it might help us determine what is
happening at the nanometer level.
Should we expect any effects of daylight saving time? No, he said —
GPS time does not use DST at all.
He was asked why, with such an ability to determine facts on the
ground from space, we did not have a better assessment of the situation in
Iraq before we invaded. Mr. McCaskill pointed out that the determination
of facts and the assessment of the overall situation are different things. He
said that while he was a government employee the Hatch Act covered him
and he avoided partisan political statements.
He was asked about atmospheric effects on passive ranging. He said
the measurements are corrected for ionospheric delay and atmospheric
anomalies. Without those corrections, the system could only determine
location to within 60 - 70 meters.
Ms. McDiarmid thanked our speaker. She presented a plaque
commemorating the occasion and awarded him a year’s membership in the
Fall 2007
106
fh
Society. Finally, at 9:48 pm, she adjourned the 2,218 meeting to the
Social Hour.
Attendance: 59
Weather: Very clear, beautiful, with a slight breeze that felt like it
came from the Gulf
Temperature: 11^
Respectfully submitted,
Ron Hietala, Recording Secretary
Washington Academy of Sciences
I
107
A REPORT OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE
WORLD FUTURE SOCIETY
MINNEAPOLIS, MN., JULY 29-31 , 2007
FOSTERING HOPE AND VISION FOR THE 21^^^ CENTURY
THE WORLD FUTURE SOCIETY’S 2007 MEETING in Minneapolis
attracted more than 900 people from 35 countries, including professional
futurists, academics and writers, and others with an active personal
interest in understanding what the future may hold and how they can help
to shape that future. This conference offered something for everyone.
The two days before the meeting offered five well-subscribed short
courses on principles and techniques of futurist study, and a Nanotech
Symposium. The meeting was followed by a Professional Members Forum
and “Minnesota Futures Day” on August 1.
Professional futurists come in several varieties. There are strategic
futurists who, as specialized consultants or from within corporations and
government agencies, advise their organizations about trends and forces
ranging from technology developments to social value change, usually on
a ten to thirty year time horizon, that will affect potential future
opportunities or problems. Tactical futurists operate on a shorter time
horizon, using statistical data bases and models to forecast impending
shifts in social, economic, and political conditions. Some futurists focus
on teaching, lecturing or writing articles and books about understanding
future possibilities. A number of U.S. colleges and universities offer
futures courses, and at least two — the University of Texas and the
University of Hawaii — offer degrees in the field.
The conference featured a number of keynote and plenary
speakers, such as: “The Future of the Family” (anthropology professor
Helen Fisher of Rutgers University), “Biotechnology and Health Care”
(Gregory Stock, Signum Biosciences), and “Innovation at the Verge” (Joel
Barker, Infinity Limited, Inc.). Seventy concurrent sessions or special
events covered such diverse topics as demographics, education,
immigration, marketing, globalization, wind energy, RFID technology,
rural design, sustainable environments, gender roles, communications.
Fall 2007
li
108
geopolitics, homeland security, urban development, blogging, civil rights,
medical technology, law enforcement, and more.
Other features of the conference included an exhibits area, a book
store, meet-the-author sessions, and job counseling services.
The 2008 WFS Conference will be in Washington, DC. Papers and
session proposals are invited; the deadline for submission is February 29.
For instructions, see www.wfs.org/2008main.htm.
—Vary Coates
Editor's note: The World Future Society is one of the Academy's
Affiliated Societies. We expect some papers from this conference to
appear in later issues of the Journal.
Washington Academy of Sciences
109
NEWS OF MEMBERS, FELLOWS, AND AFFILIATES
Joe Coates, Fellow, gave two talks at the World Future Society’s annual
meeting in Minneapolis. August 1-2, as well as teaching a two-day short
course on futures techniques preceding the final meeting. Joe has also
published a book, A Bill of Rights for IT' Century America (The Kanawha
Institute for the Future, 2007), available from Amazon.com.
Jim Cole, WAS Fellow, with co-inventers Robert P. Moeller and Marta
M. Howerton, has received his 9^*^ patent, on “Low Loss Electrodes for
Electro-optic Modulators” (7,224,869 B2).
Saj Durrani, WAS Fellow and former Vice President for Operations
(2001-04), has been named a Distinguished Engineering Alumnus by the
University of New Mexico, where he got a doctorate in Electrical
Engineering in 1962. The award will be given during a banquet in
Albuquerque on September 27. Saj had a distinguished career in industry
(GE, RCA Space Center, Comsat, etc.), and then with NASA till retiring
in 1992, after which he spent six years with the Computer Sciences Corp,
and was a Government Fellow of the lEEE-USA, first with the FCC
(2000-01) and then with the State Department (2004-05).
Tom Me yuan, with co-author Terry Teays, will celebrate the release on
October 19 of their new book. Optimizing Luck: What the Passion to
Succeed in Space Can Teach Business Leaders on Earth (Davies-Black
Publishing). Meylan and Teays were managers at NASA Goddard Space
Flight Center’s International Ultraviolet Explorer (lUE) Mission, designed
to give the entire astronomical community access to the ultraviolet
spectrum of astronomical objects. The lUE Project’s success in dealing
with the unexpected helped to extend a modest, initial three year mission
plan into a legendary twenty-year scientific institution. The techniques
documented in Optimizing Luck can, the authors say, be extended to
multiply human performance levels in other government agencies and
high-tech businesses.
Alain Touwaide, President of WAS, and Emanuela Appetiti were
invited speakers at the 3rd International Congress on Traditional Medicine
& Materia Medica, held in Kuala Lumpur on 17-20 July. Alain spoke on
Fall 2007
110
‘'A Forgotten Treasure from Ancient Documents,” and Emanuela’s paper
was on ‘The Basis of Therapeutics among Australian Aborigines.” They
also jointly presented “Cinnamon in Classical Antiquity,” in a poster
session. They followed the conference with ethnobotanical research in
communities on the East Coast of the country.
Emanuela Appetiti and Alain Touwaide also attended the 38th
International Congress for the History of Pharmacy, in Sevilla, Spain,
September 19-22, and then participated in a workshop on Arabic
Pharmacology, organized by the School of Arabic Studies of the Spanish
High Council for Scientific Research in Granada.
The History of Science Society’s Annual Meeting will be held
this year in Arlington, Virginia, on November 1-4. This will be the first
meeting in the DC area in over 15 years, and a record attendance is
already expected, including historians, scientists, philosophers, archivists,
librarians, and others. Alain Touwaide, President of the Academy, will
present a paper entitled “Global Science and International Language: The
Case of the Medieval Mediterranean.” The book exhibit is a highlight of
the annual meeting and this year for the first time the Academy will host
an exhibit to provide information about its activities. Come visit us!
There is more information at
http://www.hssonline.org/07_VA_meeting_info/VA_meeting.htm.
THE Capital Science ’08 conference March 29-30 is shaping up rapidly.
See http://www.washacadsci.org/capsci08/Index.htm.
Washington Academy of Sciences
AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS
The National Institute For Standards and Technology
Meadowlark Botanical Gardens
The John W. Kluge Center of the Library of Congress
Potomac Overlook Regional Park
Koshland Science Museum
August 2004
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
DELEGATES TO THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
REPRESENTING AFFILIATED SCIENTIFIC OCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America
American/International Association of Dental Research
American Association of Physics Teachers
! American Ceramics Society
i American Fisheries Society
! American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
American Meteorological Society
American Nuclear Society
American Phytopathological Society
American Society for Cybernetics
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
American Society of Plant Physiology
Anthropological Society of Washington
ASM International
Association for Women in Science (AWIS)
: Association for Computing Machinery
Association for Science, Technology, and Innovation
Association of Information Technology Professionals
Biological Society of Washington
I Botanical Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
District of Columbia Institute of Chemists
District of Columbia Psychology Association
Eastern Sociological Society
Electrochemical Society
Entomological Society of Washington
Geological Society of Washington
Historical Society of Washington, DC
History of Medicine Society
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Institute of Food Technologies
Institute of Industrial Engineers
Instrument Society of America
Marine Technology Society
Mathematical Association of America
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
National Capital Astronomers
National Geographic Society
Optical Society of America
Pest Science Society of America
Philosophical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Society of American Military Engineers
Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine
Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Technology Transfer Society
Virginia Native Plant Society, Potowmack Chapter
Washington Evolutionary Systems Society
Washington History of Science Club
Washington Chapter of the Institute for Operations Research
and Management Science
Washington Paint Technology Group
Washington Society of Engineers
Washington Statistical Society
World Future Society
Paul Arveson
J. Terrell Hoffeld
Frank R. Haig, S.J.
VACANT
Ramona Schreiber
David W. Brandt
Michael Greeley
Kenneth Carey
Steven Arndt
Kenneth L. Deahl
Stuart Umpleby
VACANT
Kimberly Hughes
Daniel J. Vavrick
Mark Holland
Marilyn London
Toni Marechaux
Jodi Wasemann
Lee Ohringer
F. Douglas Witherspoon
Barbara Safranek
VACANT
Emanuela Appetiti
David A.H. Roethel
David A.H. Roethel
David Williams
Ronald W. Mandersheid
Robert L. Ruedisueli
F. Christian Thompson
Bob Schneider
VACANT
Alain Touwaide
Douglas Griffith
Sajjad Durrani
Murty Polavarapu
Isabel Walls
Neal F.Schmeidler
Hank Hegner
Judith T. Krauthamer
Sharon K. Hauge
Duane Taylor
Jay H. Miller
VACANT
Jim Low
VACANT
Peg Kay
Daina D. Apple
VACANT
C.R. Creveling
VACANT
Bill Boyer
Clifford Lanham
VACANT
Jerry L.R. Chandler
Albert G. Gluckman
Russell R. Vane III
VACANT
Alvin Reiner
Michael P. Cohen
Diane Pickar
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 637
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Return Postage Guaranteed
ERNST MAYR LIBRARY
MUSEUM COMP ZOOLOGY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
26 OXFORD ST
CAMBRIDGE. MA 02138-2902
ivicuics
U.S. Pc
PA!
Merrifie
Permit Nt
Journal of the
MCZ
UBBARV
mar 04 2008
harvard
UNIVERSITY
Volume 9#'3
Number 4
Winter 2007
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Contents
Editor’s Comments i
Instructions To Authors ii
David L. Abel, Complexity, Self-Organization, and Emergence at the Edge of Chaos 1
Michael Duffy, What on Earth Are They Doing? Mining Through the Ages 21
Jafar Ha, The New International Polar Year 37
Adam Kemp, Systems Engineering at Thomas Jefferson High School 45
Directory of WAS Members and Fellows 57
Capital Science 2008 67
ISSN 0043-0439
Issued Quarterly at Washington DC
Washington Academy of Sciences
Founded in 1898
Board of Managers
Elected Officers
President
Alain Touwaide
President Eiect
Albert H. Teich
Treasurer
Russell Vane III
Secretary
James Cole
Vice President, Administration
Gerard Christman
Vice President, Membership
Murty S. Polavarapu
Vice President, Junior Academy
Paul L. Hazan
Vice President, Affiliated Societies
E. Eugene Williams
Members at Large
Sethanne Howard
Donna Dean
Vary T. Coates
Frank Haig, S.J.
Jodi Wesemann
Past President: Bill Boyer
The Journal of the Washington Academy
of Sciences
The Journal is the official organ of the
Academy. It publishes articles on science
policy, the history of science, critical reviews,
original science research, proceedings of
scholarly meetings of its Affiliated Societies,
and other Items of Interest to its members. It is
published quarterly. The last issue of the year
contains a directory of the current membership
of the Academy.
Subscription Rates
Members, fellows, and life members in good
standing receive the Journal free of charge.
Subscriptions are available on a calendar year
basis, payable in advance. Payment must be
made in U.S. currency at the following rates.
US and Canada $25.00
Other Countries 30.00
Single Copies (when available) 10.00
Ciaims for Missing Issues
Claims must be received within 65 days of
mailing. Claims will not be allowed if non-
delivery was the result of failure to notify the
Academy of a change of address.
AFFILIATED SOCIETY DELEGATES!
Shown on back cover
Editor of the Journal
Vary T. Coates
Associate Editors:
Sethanne Howard
Emanuela Appetiti
Elizabeth Corona
Alain Touwaide
Academy Office
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 631
1200 New York Ave NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202/326-8975
Notification of Change of Address
Address changes should be sent promptly to
the Academy Office. Notification should
contain both old and new addresses and zip
codes.
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to WAS, Rm.631,
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC. 20005
Journal of the Washington Academy of
Sciences (ISSN 0043-0439)
Published by the Washington Academy of
Sciences 202/326-8975
email: was@washacadsci .orq
website: www.washacadsci.orq
THE EDITOR COMMENTS
Scientific careers often begin early, with a strong interest in
science being evidenced and hopefully encouraged well before a student
reaches college. In this issue we are given a window into that exciting
development by two papers, one contributed by Adam Kemp, a teacher in
a local high school that specializes in the teaching of principles of science
and engineering, and another by Jafar Ila, a freshman at Florida State
University then on a summer internship in Washington.
As with all quarterly journals, we are usually in the process of accepting,
editing, and formatting papers as long as a year (and at least two months)
before you receive the journal issue that includes them. Yet often the
contents when they appear seem surprisingly timely. For example, Adam
Kemp’s paper in this issue describes the work being done by his systems
engineering students at Thomas Jefferson High School of Science and
Teclinology. On November 30, just after we sent the final galleys to Mr.
Kemp for approval, the Washington Post noted that his school had been
named the nation’s No.l high school for academic excellence by US.
News World Report Magazine. Mining safety and health, one focus of
Michael Duffy’s paper in this issue, became the subject of many news
stories and policy debates following several mining disasters in the
summer of 2007.
The Spring 2007 issue of the Journal carried a paper by R. Allen Gardner,
“Review of Sign Language Studies of Cross Fostered Chimpanzees.”
Sadly, The New York Times on November 1 announced (in a quarter-page
spread on page A 13) that Washoe, the first of the infant chimps fostered
by Drs. Allen and Beatrix Gardner at the University of Nevada and
encouraged to communicate using American Sign Language, has died. The
Times reported that Washoe died in bed, of natural causes, at age 42,
“surrounded by staff and other primates who were close to her.”
As we ready this issue for press, in early December, it is timely to wish
our readers a healthy, prosperous, and happy New Year!
Winter 2007
II
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
THE JOURNAL of the Washington Academy of Sciences is a peer-
reviewed journal. Exceptions are made for papers requested by the editors
or positively approved for presentation or publication by one of our
affiliated scientific societies.
We welcome disciplinary and interdisciplinary scientific research reports
and papers on technology development and innovation, science policy,
technology assessment, and history of science and technology. Book
reviews are also welcome.
Contributors of papers are requested to follow these guidelines carefully.
Papers should be submitted as e-mail attacliments to the chief editor, vcoatcs@mac.coni
along witli full contact information for the primary or corresponding author.
Papers should be presented in Word; do not send PDF files.
Papers should be 6000 words or fewer. If more tlian 6 graphics are included tlie number
of words allowed will be reduced accordingly.
Graphics must be in black and white only. They must be easily resized and relocated. It is
best to put graphics, including tables, at the end of the paper or in a separate document,
with tlieir preferred location in the text clearly indicated.
References should be in the form of endnotes, and may be in any style considered
standard in tlie discipline(s) represented by the paper.
Washington Academy of Sciences
COMPLEXITY, SELF-ORGANIZATION,
AND EMERGENCE AT THE EDGE OF CHAOS
IN LIFE ORIGIN MODELS
David L. Abel*
The Origin of Life Foundation, Inc,
Abstract
“Complexity,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” are terms used extensively in
life -origin literature. Yet precise and quantitative definitions of these terms are
sorely lacking. “Emergence at the edge of chaos” invites vivid imagination of
spontaneous creativity. Unfortunately, the phrase lacks scientific substance and
explanatory mechanism. We explore the meaning, role, and relationship of
complexity at the edge of chaos along with self-organization. We examine their
relevance to life-origin processes. I'he high degree of order and pattern found in
“necessity” (the regularities of nature described by the “laws” of physics) greatly
reduce the unceilainty and information retaining potential of spontaneously-
ordered physical matiices. No as-of-yet undiscovered law, therefore, will be able
to explain the high information content of even the simplest prescriptive genome.
Maximum complexity corresponds to randomness when defined from a
Kolmogorov perspective. No empirical evidence exists of randomness (maximum
complexity) generating a halting computational program. Neither order nor
complexity is the key to frmction. Complexity demonstrates no ability to compute.
Genetic cybernetics inspired Turing’s, von Neumann’s, and Wiener’s development
of computer science. Genetic cybernetics cannot be explained by the chance and
necessity of physicodynamics. Genetic algoritlimic control is fundamentally
formal, not physical. But like other expressions of formality, it can be instantiated
into a physical matrix of retention and channel transmission using dynamically-
inert configurable switches. Neither parsimonious law nor complexity can
program the efficacious decision-node logic-gate settings of algorithmic
orgamzation observed in all known living organisms.
*
Dr. David L. Abel is a theoretical biologist focusing on primordial biocybemetics. He
is the Program Director of The Gene Emergence Pro ject, an international consortium of
scientists pursuing the natural-process derivation of initial biocybernetic/biosemiotic
programming and control.
Winter 2007
2
By what natural process did inanimate nature generate:
1 . A genetic representational sign/symbol/token system?
2. Decision nodes and logic gates?
3. Dynamically-inert (dynamically incoherent) (Rocha, 2001)
configurable switch settings that instantiate functional “choices”
into physicality?
4. A formal operating system, software, and the hardware on which
to mn it?
5. An abstract encryption/decryption system jointly intelligible to
both source and destination?
6. Many-to-one Hamming “block codes” (triplet-nucleotide codons
prescribing each single amino acid) used to reduce the noise
pollution of genetic messages?
7. The ability to achieve computational halting in the form of
homeostatic metabolism?
The heuristic/operational value of using computational and
linguistic analogies to describe genetic programming is widely accepted. It
is nevertheless common to dismiss many of the above-listed parallels with
cybernetics as being merely metaphor. Multiple investigators have taken a
close look at possible limits to this metaphor (Emmeche and Hoffmeyer,
1991, Fiumara, 1995, Konopka, 2002, Lackoff and Johnson, 1980,
Lackoff, 1993, Rosen, 1993, Sarkar, 2003, Torgny, 1997). Others have
discussed whether semantic infonuation about phenotypic traits actually
exists (Allan and Koppel, 1990, Godftey-Smith, 2003, Griffiths, 2001,
Maynard Smith, 2000, Moss, 2003, Stegmann, 2005, Sterelny et ai, 1996,
Wheeler, 2003). Lwoff warned against taking the genetic information and
linguistic metaphors too far (Lwoff, 1962). Some claim that the metaphor
is misleading (Godfrey-Smith, 2003, Griffiths, 2001, Kauffman, 1993,
Kay, 2000, Keller, 2000, Noble, 2002, Stent, 1981). Rocha (Rocha, 2001,
Rocha and Hordijk, 2005) fully appreciates Pattee’s epistemic cut (Pattee,
1995b) and the need for semantic closure (Pattee, 1995a), but seeks to
explain formal self-organization and sign systems physicodynamically.
Others view genetic information as real (Jacob, 1974), (Alberts et al,
2002), (Davidson et aL, 2002), (Wolpert, 2002), (Stegmann, 2005),
(Barbieri, 2004) and (Abel, 2002, Abel and Trevors, 2005, 2006a, b, 2007,
Abel, 2009).
None of these bioinformation literalists, however, views genetic
information as being “everything.” Anti-informationists (e.g.,
Washington Academy of Sciences
3
infodynamicists) often create this straw-man argument as justification for
denial that any bioinformation exists. Such factors as non-genetic
inheritance of cytoplasm and membrane, the role of environment in gene
expression, epigenetic factors, prions, post-transcriptional and post-
translational editing, do not undo the reality of objective prescriptive
information instantiated into linear digital genetic code. They only
compound the sophistication of life’s control mechanisms.
The first problem with trying to reduce the cybernetic nature of
molecular biology to mere metaphor is that biological programming
predates the veiy existence of metaphors. Molecular biology provided the
model for the entire field of cybernetics. Genetic cybernetics inspired
Turing’s (Turing, 1936), von Neumann’s (von Neumann, 1950), and
Wiener’s (Wiener, 1948) development of computer science. Had it not
been for their observation of linear digital genetic control, computers
might never have been invented. The argument is therefore untenable, if
not amusing, that computer science generated only an analogy applied to
molecular biology in the minds of humans. If anything, computer science
is analogous to the formal logic of a molecular biology that not only
preceded, but produced Homo sapiens brains and minds.
What exactly is Complexity?
Use of the term ''complexity” is extensive in life-origin scientific
literature. Unfortunately, complexity is a garbage-can catch-all term we
use to explain everything we don’t understand and can’t reduce.
Surprisingly, an unequivocal, pristine, mathematical definition of
"complexity” does exist in scientific literature (Kolmogorov, 1965, Li and
Vitanyi, 1997). We achieve quantification of complexity through
measuring algorithmic compressibility. When a sequence camiot be
compressed, it is maximally complex. Random sequences are maximally
complex. Maximum complexity cannot be compressed because it lacks
patterns and order (Chaitin, 1990, 2001).
Charles Bennett’s "logical depth” is also worthy of mention here
(Bennett, 1989). Logical depth measures the time required for
computational halting. But logical depth presupposes many computer
science design concepts not relevant to prebiotic molecular evolution
questions. We will not be able to elucidate the derivation through natural
Winter 2007
4
process of initial genetic algorithmic control through a discussion of
logical depth.
The paradox of Kolmogorov/Solomonoff/ChaitinAfockey
algorithmic infonuation theory is that orderliness lies at the opposite end
of the complexity scale from uncertainty and potential information. Even
more paradoxical is that randomness (maximum complexity) contains the
maximum number of bits of non-compressible ‘‘information.” The reason
this seems so confusing is that Shannon equations do not really quantify
“information.” They quantify uncertainty and reduced uncertainty (before
and after acquired knowledge). The real purpose of Shannon theoiy is to
compare sequences: the one sent by the transmitter vs. the one received at
the receiver. It’s also important for us to remember that Shannon
quantifications have nothing to do with meaning or function (Shannon,
1948). Referring to Shamion quantifications using the term “information”
leads to much confusion. It displeased Shannon himself Shannon opposed
calling his theory of communication engineering, “information theory”
(Shannon, 1951).
As the probability of an event approaches 1 .0, its order increases,
and its Shannon uncertainty approaches 0 bits. A law of physics is a j
compression algorithm for reams of data. At first glance, the data seem
almost random. The discovery of a law of physics corresponds to the
discovery of order and patterns of relationship hidden in that data. '
High probability is high order. A polyadenosine theoretically has
maximum order, no uncertainty, and therefore no complexity. Uncertainty
and Shannon Information are inversely related to order. The reason laws
are so parsimonious is that they describe a highly patterned, highly
ordered dynamic. Because law-like behavior is so regular, very little
information is required to describe the order of inanimate nature. Very i
little information can potentially be retained in any structure produced by
natural force relationships.
The Relationship Between Order and Complexity
Hubert Yockey has graphically clarified the relationship between |
order and complexity (Yockey, 2002). The inverse relationship between
order and complexity is demonstrated on a linear vector progression from i
high order on the left toward greater complexity on the right (Figure 1).
Washington Academy of Sciences
5
The arrow point represents theoretical absolute randomness. How
can ''maximum complexity” possibly equal "randomness”? The answer is
that randomness cannot be algorithmically compressed to any degree. It is
therefore maximally complex. Maximum complexity is a low-end
probability bound approaching 0. The probability of 0 is a wall rather than
an edge. No probability can go below 0. No event of probability lower
than 0 interfaces with events with 0 probability.
The relationship between order and Kolmogorov algorithmic
complexity is shown graphically in Figure 2. By adding a second
dimension (Axis Yl) to the unidimensional linear vector graph of Yockey,
we can visualize the high degree of compressibility for a highly ordered
sequence like polyadenosine. Note the low degree of compressibility for a
random sequence. Ordered Sequence Complexity (OSC) is on the left.
Maximum order means maximum compressibility. Random Sequence
Complexity (RSC) is on the right. Random sequences have no
compressibility. No compressibility is maximum complexity. The more
highly ordered (patterned) a sequence, the more highly compressible that
sequence becomes. The less compressible a sequence, the more complex
is that sequence. A random sequence manifests no Kolmogorov
compressibility. This reality serves as the very definition of a random,
highly complex string. Algorithmic compressibility provides a reliable
mathematical definition of “complexity.” The shortest statement of a
random sequence is the enumeration of every character of the sequence
(Chaitin, 1990, 2001,2002).
Complexity Cannot Compute
Although a robust mathematical definition of complexity exists,
much to our chagrin, complexity has absolutely nothing to do with
function. Yet more often than not, we appeal to complexity as an
explanation of computational life-origin processes. Algorithmic function,
primordial biocybernetics, and initial organization are what we are hoping
to explain. Mere complexity provides no mechanism for any of these
three.
Computation is formal, not physical. Both computation and any
form of algorithmic optimization require efficacious decision-node
Winter 2007
6
selections. When these selections are made randomly, computational
halting has never been observed to arise.
Sophisticated algorithmic optimization has never been achieved by
chance. Function must be “selected for” at the logic-gate programming
level prior to the realization of that function. Selection of fittest function is
always after the fact of any computational success. This is called The
Genetic Selection Principle (GS Principle) (Abel and Trevors, 2005,
2006a, b, 2007, Abel, 2009). Natural selection favors only the fittest
already-computed phenotypes. Yet selection must occur at the logic-gate
level of genetic programming. Configurable switches are “set in stone”
with rigid covalent bonds before folding begins.
Three-dimensional conformation of molecular machines is largely
determined by the minimum-free-energy sinks of primary structure
folding. The primary structure of any protein or sRNA is the already- i
covalently-bound sequence of particular monomers that serve as |
configurable switch-settings.
Maximum complexity is randomness because randomness offers
the highest degree of combinatorial uncertainty. But randomness is the
equivalent of pure noise. Noise has never been observed to program any
algorithm. Adding long periods of time provides no mechanism of
selection at the decision node level where programming is accomplished.
Although a random sequence could happen to match a program sequence,
outside of a specifically chosen operational context and set of rules, such a
matching sequence would remain random and nonfunctional. Thus not
only would the random sequence itself have to match the program
sequence, but the operating system at both ends of the channel would also
have to match by chance in order for function to arise.
Order Cannot Compute
Much life-origin literature appeals to “yet-to-be discovered laws of
self-organization.” Laws, however, describe highly ordered/pattemed
behavior. Because they are parsimonious compression algorithms of data,
they contain very little information. Given the high information content of
life, expecting a new law to explain sophisticated genetic algorithmic
programming is ill-founded. Considerable peer-reviewed published
literature is erroneous because of failure to appreciate that the “complexity
Washington Academy of Sciences
7
of life” could never arise from such highly “ordered,” low informational
physicodynamic patterning. Tremendous combinatorial uncertainty is
required. The complexity of life will never be explained by the highly
ordered behavior that is reducible to the low-informational laws of physics
and chemistry.
A crystal is highly ordered. Its description can be easily
algorithmically compressed. A crystal is about as far from being “alive” as
any physical state we could suggest. Every member of a 200-monomer
string of adenosines can be specifically enumerated by stating two short
clauses. “Give me an adenosine. Repeat 200 times.” This is called a
compression algorithm. The simplicity and shortness of this compression
algorithm is a measure of the extremely low complexity of this polymer.
Such a parsimonious statement of the full sequence is only possible
because that sequence is so highly patterned. Such a highly ordered
sequence lacks uncertainty, complexity, and the ability to instantiate
prescriptive information. Such a parsimonious compression algorithm can
enumerate each and every member of the 200-mer string with only seven
words. This reality defines high order or pattern along with low
information retaining potential.
We value Ocham’s Razor in laws because we realize that
physicality is so highly ordered. We consider a law to be elegant and
beautiful because of its ability to compress reams of data down to one
little parsimonious equation. When we look for new laws of physics, we
look for new compression algorithms for reams of data.
When we come to biology, however, we encounter not only the
highest degree of complexity known, we encounter linear, digital,
cybernetic, prescriptive information of the most sophisticated, abstract,
and conceptual nature. The world’s finest main frame parallel computer
system cannot hold a candle to the central nervous system of any mammal.
If all four RNA bases were equally available in a theoretical
primordial soup, each nucleotide selection would represent 2 bits of
Shannon uncertainty. If, on the other hand, some bases were more
available than others in primordial soup, the uncertainty of each
nucleotide selection drops to much less than 2 bits. Unequal availability of
bases results in more ordering of the sequence. More ordering = less
complexity, and therefore less infonnation retention potential. The
particular oligoribonucleotide strand would have mostly one or two bases
Winter 2007
with less uncertainty, fewer bits, and therefore less complexity than if all
four bases were equally available.
All too many life-origin specialists still operate under the mistaken
premise that greater complexity contains more order. In reality, order and
complexity are antithetical. In addition, neither order nor complexity is the
key to function. Neither order nor complexity alone can generate
algorithmic organization. Bona fide organization results from algorithmic
optimization. The best solutions to any problem must be selected to
achieve optimization. Apart from selection, noise will increase within any
system. A tendency toward randomization and loss of function unfolds
from noise. Complexity increases while algorithmic optimization
decreases.
This latter point exposes the second common illusion, that
increasing complexity produces increasing algorithmic utility. In reality,
complexity has nothing to do with integration, organization, or utility.
Programming requires formal decision-node choice commitments made
with intent. Any attempt to disallow choice or intent from the mix results
in the deterioration of programming function, computational halting,
integration, and organization.
In addition to showing the Kolmogorov compression in the second
dimension (Y axis). Figure 2 also shows the superimposition of a third
cybernetic dimension (Z axis), Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC).
The Y axis plane plots the decreasing degree of algorithmic
compressibility as complexity increases from order towards randomness.
The (Z) axis plane shows where along the same complexity gradient (X-
axis) that highly instructional sequences and algorithmic programs are
generally found.
The FSC curve includes all algorithmic sequences that work at all
(W). The peak of this curve (w*) represents “what works best.” The FSC
curve is usually quite narrow and is located closer to the random end than
to the ordered end of the complexity scale.
The third dimension of utility and organization is when each
alphabetical token in the linear string is selected for meaning or function.
The string becomes a cybernetic program capable of computation only
when signs/symbols/tokens are chosen to represent utilitarian configurable
switch settings. What is the common denominator to all aspects of design
and engineering function? Choice contingency; not chance contingency,
not law, not physicodynamics, but choice contingency. The FSC curve is
Washington Academy of Sciences
9
usually quite narrow and is located closer to the random end than to the
ordered end of the complexity scale. Compression of an instructive
sequence slides the FSC curve towards the right (away from order,
towards maximum complexity, maximum Shannon uncertainty, and
seeming randomness) with no loss of function. This further demonstrates
that neither order nor complexity is the determinant of algorithmic
function. Functionality arises in a third dimension of selection that is
unknown to the second dimension of compressibility. This is one of the
most poorly understood realities in life-origin science. Selection alone
produces functionality. Without selection, evolution would be impossible.
Figure 3 is a dendrogram showing all possible sequences (branches
or paths) of decision node options. W paths may show some function, but
w* represents the best algorithmic path to achieve maximum function.
Notice that each path contains equal (N) bits of Shannon uncertainty
regardless of whether the path leads to anything useful. The measurement
of bits tells us nothing about whether the string does anything useful. Only
certain strings of specific choice commitments lead to function and
organization. Neither -log2 P nor the formula for Shannon mutual entropy
[1( A : B) = H{x)-H{x \ y) ] measures prescriptive information (Abel and
Trevors, 2005, 2006a, b, 2007, Abel, 2009, Trevors and Abel, 2004).
Prescriptive information either instructs or directly produces sophisticated
algorithmic utility. In addition, no reason exists to think that maximum
complexity (randomness; noise; maximum uncertainty; maximum bits)
has any functional capability in and of itself. If anything, we expect no
flinction at all out of maximum complexity.
All Known Life is Cybernetic
Any one of four different nucleotides can be added next to a
forming nucleic acid strand in aqueous solution. No physicochemical bias
exists (Judson, 1993, Monod, 1972, Polanyi, 1968) for which nucleotide
polymerizes apart from base-pairing of an already existing strand, or clay-
surface templating. The latter tends to produce polyadenosines, a non-
informational sequence because of its extremely high order and extremely
low uncertainty. Physicodynamics, therefore, does not explain functional
sequencing. The effort that has been invested into genome projects affirms
the prescriptive nature of nucleotide sequencing. While not everything, no
Winter 2007
10
one can deny that amino acid sequencing is determined by triplet codon
sequencing.
Eveiy nucleotide added to an oligoribonucleotide in the pre RNA
World represents the specific setting of an additional discrete 4-way
configurable switch. The appropriate setting of a string of programmable
switches alone accounts for computational success. Computational
“halting” in the pre RNA World is defined in terms of catalytic binding
success of three dimensional small RNA’s. But binding success depends
upon secondary and tertiary structure. Secondary and tertiary structure in
turn depends upon the thermodynamic minimum-free-energy folding sinks
of each primary structure (Rhoades et ai, 2003). Primary structure is the
sequence of nucleotides. This linear digital sequence of nucleotides is held
together by rigid covalent bonds. Covalent bonds are “written in stone”
compared to the weak hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, electrostatic
attractions and repulsions, and hydrophobicities that contribute to
secondary folding.
Atlan et al attempt to elucidate a mechanism for self-classification
and self-organization in automata networks (Atlan et al, 1986). They also
explore the notion of self-creation of meaning (Atlan, 1987). Finally they
suggest that DNA is data rather than program (Atlan and Koppel, 1990).
As with Shannon (Shannon, 1948), Kolmogorov (Kolmogorov, 1965),
Chaitin (Chaitin, 1987), and Yockey (Yockey, 2005), Atlan et a/.'s
concept of information fails to measure up to what we actually observe in
molecular cybernetics. The reason is a failure to acknowledge and
incorporate the literal instructive and controlling role of genetic
information. Linear digital genetic information specifically prescribes
functional sRNA and protein sequences. Post transcriptional and post
translational editing does not undo this reality. They only add to the
sophistication of the entire system. No progress will be made in
quantifying semantic information until we pursue the unique properties of
what Abel has termed prescriptive information (Abel and Trevors, 2006a,
b.2007, Abel, 2009). Prescriptive information is more than just semantic.
It is cybernetic. Prescriptive information alone generates computational
halting in the form of homeostatic metabolism. No theory of combinatorial
probabilism or compression can explain or measure computational
success. Charles Bennett’s logical depth (Bennett, 1988) comes the
closest, but presupposes human-designed computer science in a fashion
inappropriate for prebiotic molecular evolution theory.
Washington Academy of Sciences
11
The key to everything that Turing, von Neumann, and Weiner did
in inventing computers was to recognize that life is made possible because
molecular biology uses dynamically incoherent, dynamically inert, freely-
configurable switches (Rocha, 2000). Any of the four ribonucleotides can
polymerize next in aqueous solution. This fact is what makes information
recordation into the physical matrix of nucleic acid possible. If selection
of the next nucleotide were determined by physicodynamic factors, the
sequence would be too highly ordered and redundant for ‘‘messenger
molecules” to be possible. Using only four alphabetical characters (four
different nucleotides), any instructions can be written into DNA. What
makes programming possible is that the switch is designed to be freely
"configurable.” Any of the four letters can be chosen without
physicochemical prejudice. This means that no law determines which way
the four-way switch knob is pushed.
In computer science, only the programmer’s mind determines
which way the switch knob is pushed. In evolution science we say that
environmental selection “favors” the fittest small groups. But selection is
still the key factor, not chance and necessity. If physicodynamics set the
switches, the switches would either be set randomly by heat agitation, or
they would be set by force relationships and constants. Neither chance nor
necessity, nor any combination of the two, can program. Chance produces
only noise and junk code. Law would set all of the switches the same way.
Configurable switches must be set using "choice with intent" if
"computational halting" is expected.
Nucleic acid can spontaneously form without purpose, such as a
polyadenosine forming (by physicochemical law) on a montmorillonite
clay template surface. But the latter is a classic example of all the switches
being set the same when law is involved. A polyadenosine is nucleic acid,
but it can't program anything. It can't relay any information, because all of
the four-way switches have been set the same way (all adenosines) “by
law.” What so many fail to realize is that RNA and DNA are nothing but
ordinary physical molecules that have the potential of being used for
information retention only through selection of each nucleotide. It is the
sequencing of particular nitrogen base selections that accounts for any
information retention in a nucleic acid molecule, not the largely inert
DNA itself. Prescriptive information is not physicodynamic. It is formal,
though it can be instantiated into a physical medium using dynamically
inert configurable switches.
Winter 2007
12
RNA (oligoribonucleotides up to eight monomers, at least) can
form spontaneously in aqueous solution. But such strings are "stochastic
ensembles" (random strings of nucleotides). As such, they too contain no
prescriptive information. They are like linguistic gibberish. They are
‘'garbage in, garbage out” computer code, pure “software bugs.”
A “cybernetic program” presupposes a cybernetic context in which
it operates. One has to have an operating system of "rules" before one can
have an application software. And of course one must have a hardware
system too. All of these components only come into existence through
"choice contingency," not through "chance contingency" or law. One of
many problems with metaphysical materialism is that it acknowledges
only two subsets of reality: chance and necessity. Neither can write
operating system rules or application software. Neither can generate
hardware or any other kind of sophisticated machinery, including
molecular machines (the most sophisticated machinery known).
We see in Figure 2 that complexity as mathematically and
scientifically defined is blind to function. Mere complexity cannot
generate algorithmic optimization. Selection for fitness is required.
Complexity cannot do this. Complexity knows nothing of selection,
fitness, or meaning. Without selection, evolution is impossible.
The Edge of Chaos
Physical events “at the edge of chaos” have never been observed to
select for fitness or binding success. No mechanism has been
demonstrated empirically whereby physicodynamics spontaneously
generates sophisticated algorithmic optimization or bona fide
organization. Switches must be set a certain way to achieve integrated
circuits. Order can spontaneously emerge from chaos. But if chaos sets
configurable switches, the result will predictably “blue screen.” Without
steering towards sophisticated function at each decision node,
sophisticated function has never been observed to arise spontaneously,
only disorganization accumulates. No prediction fulfillments have been
realized of cooperative integration of biofunction arising spontaneously in
nature.
“Emergence at the edge of chaos” is poetic, if not mesmerizing.
The phrase invites vivid imagination of mystical powers and ingenious
Washington Academy of Sciences
13
spontaneous creativity. Unfortunately, this notion has not provided
detailed scientific mechanism to explain the efficacious selection of
pragmatic configurable switch-settings. Organization requires algorithmic
optimization. The latter requires expedient decision-node commitments
that are instantiated into specific physical configurable switch-settings. To
explain life origin requires elucidating how these particular logic gates
were selected at the genetic level. Phenotypes must first be computed
before the fittest phenotype can be selected.
No plausible theoretical mechanism and no empirical evidence for
emergence exist in the literature. No prediction fulfillment of spontaneous
emergence exists. In every case that provides the illusion of spontaneous
emergence, investigator involvement can be demonstrated in the Materials
and Methods section of so-called ‘‘evolutionary algoritlim” papers. The
experimenter’s goal and steering are apparent in faulty experimental
designs. This is usually evident in the choice of each successive iteration
to pursue. Real evolution has no goal. Iterations cannot be steered toward
experimenters’ goals (e.g,, a desired ribozyme using SELEX (Ellington
and Szostak, 1990, Robertson and Joyce, 1990, Tuerk and Gold, 1990)).
Quality science requires brutal self-honesty. We must be open-minded
enough to consider the possibility that emergence and self-organization
are closer to metaphysical presuppositions than observed scientific facts.
Notes:
Abel, D.L.. 2002, Is life reducible to complexity? In Palyi, G., Zucchi. C. and Caglioti,
L., Fundamentals of life. Elsevier, Paris.
Abel, D.L., 2009, The biosemiosis of prescriptive information. Semiotica. in press.
Abel, D.L. and Trevors, J.T., 2005, Tliree subsets of sequence complexity and their
relevance to biopolymeric infomiation. Theoretical Biology and Medical
Modeling 2: 29, open access at http:/7vvw-'w.tbionied.coni/conient/2. 1 '29
Abel, D.L. and Trevors, J.T., 2006a, More tlian metaphor: Genomes are objective sign
systems. Journal of BioSemiotics,!, 25.3-267. Also in M. Barbieri (Ed.),
BioSemiotic Research Treads, pp. 1-15). Nova Science Publishers Inc., New
York.
Abel, D.L., and Trevors, J.T. , 2006b. Self-Organization vs. Self-ordering events in life-
origin models. Physics of Life Reviews, .3, 2 1 1-228.
Alberts, B. et ai, 2002. Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science, New York.
Winter 2007
14
Atlaii. H.. E., B.-E.. Fogelnian-Soulic. F.. Pellegrin. D. and Weisbuch. G.. 1 986.
Emergence of classification procedures in automata networks as a model for
functional self-organization. J.Theor. Biol. 120: 371-380.
Atlan. H., 1987. Self-creation of meaning. Physica Scripta 36: 563-576.
Atlan. H. and Koppel, M., 1990. The cellular computer DNA: Program or data. Bulletin
of Mathematical Biology 52: 335-348.
Barbieri. M.. 2(X)4. Biolog>’ \\i\h information and meaning. Histoiy & Philosophy of the t
Life Sciences 25: 243-254. |
t
Bennett. C.H.. 1988. "Logical Depth and Physical Complexit> " In Tlie Universal Turing \
Macliine-a Half-Cenmiy Sur\ ey. R. Herken. editor. Oxford Oxford UniversiU' •!
Press. 227-257. ' ' ' ;
Chaitin. G.J., 1987, Information, randomness & incompleteness: Papers on algorithmic '
information theory. World Scientific. Singapore: Teaneck. NJ, USA.
Chaitin. G.J.. 1990. Information, randomness and incompleteness: Papers on algorithmic |
information theorx . W'orld Scientific, Singapore: Teaneck. NJ. USA. !
Chaitin. G.J., 2001. E.xploring randomness. Springer, London: New York. j
Chaitin. G.J., 2002. Conversations with a mathematician: Math. art. science, and the ]
limits of reason: A collection of his most w ide-ranging and non-technical ‘j
lectures and imeiviews. Springer, London: New York. i
Da\idson. E.H., Rast. J.P., Oliveri. P.. Ransick. A., Calestani, C.. Yuh. C.H., Minokawa. '
T.. .Amore. G.. Hinman. W. .^renas-Mena. C.. Otim. O.. Brown. C.T., Livi. j
C.B.. Lee. P.Y.. Revilla. R.. Rust. A.G.. Pan. Z., Schilstra. M.J.. Clarke, P.J..
.Anione, M.L. Rowen. L.. Cameron, R.A.. McClay. D.R.. Hood. L. and Bolouri.
H.. 2002. .A genomic regulatorv network for development. Science 295: 1669-
78. ^
Ellington. A.D. and Szostak. J.W.. 1990, In \itro selection of ma molecules that bind
specific ligands. Namre 346: 818-822.
Emmeche, C. and Hoffmeyer, J., 1991, From language to nature: The semiotic metaphor
in biolog>-. Semiotica 84: 1-42.
Fiumara. G.C.. 1995. The metaphoric process: Connections between language and life.
Rutledge, London.
Godfrey-Smith. P., 2003. Genes do not encode information for phenot>pic traits. In
Hitchcock. C., Contemporar>- debates in philosophy of science. Black-well,
London.
Griffiths, P.E.. 2001, Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theor>\ Philosophy
of Science 68: 394-412. i
Jacob. F.. 1974. The logic of liMng systems— a histoiy of herediK. Allen Lane. London.
Judson. H.F.. 1993. Frederick Sanger. Envin Chargaff. and the metamorphosis of
specifiy. Gene 135: 19-23.
J.
i
Washington Academy of Sciences
15
Kauffman, S.A., 1993, The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kay. L., 2000, Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford
University Press, Stanford, CA.
Keller, E.F., 2000, Decoding tlie genetic program. In Beurton, P., Falk, R. and
Rlieinberger. H.-J., The concept of the gene in development and evolution.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kolmogorov, A.N., 1965, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of the concept
’’quantity of infonnation.” Problems Infonn. Transmission 1: 1-7.
Konopka, A.K., 2002, Grand metaphors of biology in tlie genome era. Computers &
Chemistry 26: 397-401.
Lackoff, G. and Jolinson, M., 1980, Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press,
Chicago. IF.
Lackoff, G., 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A., Mataphor and
tliought, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Li. M. and Vitanyi, P., 1997, An introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its
applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Lwoff, A., 1962, Biological order. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Maynard Smith, J., 2000, The concept of infonnation in biology. Philosophy of Science
67: 177-194 (entire issue is an excellent discussion).
Monod, J., 1972, Chance and necessity. Knopf, New York.
Moss, L., 2003, What genes can't do. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Noble, D., 2002, Modeling the heart-from genes to cells to the whole organ. Science
295: 1678-82.
Pattee, H.H., 1995a, Evolving self-reference: Matter, symbols, and semantic closure.
Communication and Cognition- Artificial Intelligence 12: 9-28.
Pattee, H. H. 1995b, Artificial Life Needs a Real Epistemology. In Advances in Artificial
Life, F. Moran, editor. Springer, Berlin. 23-38.
Polanyi, M., 1968, Life’s irreducible structure. Science 160: 1308-12
Rhoades, E.. Gussakovsky. E. and Haran, G., 2003, Watching proteins fold one molecule
at a time. PNAS 100: 3197-3202
Robertson, D.L. and Joyce, G.F., 1990, Selection in vitro of an ma enzyme that
specifically cleaves single-stranded DNA. Nature 344: 467-468
Rocha, L.M., 2000, Syntactic autonomy: Or why there is no autonomy without symbols
and how self-organizing systems might evolve them. In Chandler, J.L.R. and
van deVijver, G., Closure: Emergent organizations and their dynamics. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol 901, 207-223.
Rocha, L.M., 2001, Evolution with material symbol systems. Biosystems 60: 95-121.
Winter 2007
16
Rocha, L.M. and Hordijk, W., 2005, Material representations; From the genetic code to
tlic evolution of cellular automata. Artif Life 11; 189-214.
Rosen, R., 1993, Bionics revisited. In Haken, H., Kaiiqvist, A. and Svedin, U., The
machine as a metaphor and tool. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Sarkar, S., 2003, Genes encode information for phenotypic traits. In Hitchcock, C.,
Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, London.
Shannon, C., 1948, Part i and ii; A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell
System Technical Journal XXVII; 379-423.
Shannon, E.C., 1951, Intersymbol influence reduces infonnation content. Bell. Sys.
Tech. J. 30; 50.
Stegmann, U.E., 2005, Genetic infonnation as instructional content. Philosophy of
Science 72; 425-443.
Stent, G.S., 1981, Strength and weakness of the genetic approach to the development of
the nervous system. Aimu Rev Neurosci 4; 163-94.
Sterelny, K., Smith, K. and Dickison, M., 1996, The extended replicator. Biology and
Philosophy 11; 377-403.
Torgny, O., 1997, Metaphor— a working concept. KTH, Royal Institute of Technology.
CID, Stockholm, Sweden.
Trevors, J.T. and Abel, D.L., 2004, Chance and necessity do not explain the origin of
life. Cell Biology International 28; 729-739.
Tuerk, C. and Gold, L., 1990, Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment
— nia ligands to bacteriophage - 14 DNA-polymerase. Science 249; 505-510.
Turing, A.M., 1936, On computable numbers, witli an application to the entscheidungs-
problem. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Mathematical Society 42; 230-265 [correction
in 43, 544-546].
Wheeler, M., 2003, Do genes code for traits? In Rojszczak, A., Cachro, J. and
Kurezewski, G., Philosophic dimensions of logic and science; Selected
contributed papers from the 1 1 th international congress of logic, methodology,
and philosophy of science. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Wiener, N., 1948, Cybernetics. Hemiaim, Paris.
Wolpert, L., 2002, Principles of development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yockey, H.P., 2002, Information theory, evolution and the origin of life. Infonnation
Sciences 141; 219-225
Yockey, H.P., 2005, Information theory, evolution, and the origin of life. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Washington Academy of Sciences
17
FIGURE I
The inverse relationship between order and complexity is demonstrated on a linear vector
progression from high order on the left toward greater complexity on tlie right.
The arrow point represents theoretical absolute randomness. How can “maximum
complexity” possibly equal “randonuiess?” The answer is that randomness cannot be
algorithmically compressed to any degree. It is therefore maximally complex.
Maximum complexity is a low-end probability bound approaching 0, a wall rather than
an edge. No probability can go below 0. (Modified from Hubert Yockey,
Fundamentals of Life. Edited by Palyi G, Zucchi C, Caglioti L. Paris: Elsevier; 2002:
335-348.) (Abel, David L., and Jack. T. Trevors (2005), "Three subsets of sequence
complexity and their relevance to biopolymeric information." Theoretical Biology and
Medical Modeling 2:29, open access at http://ww^w. tbiomed.com/content/22/21/29.)
Order
Ordered Sequence Complexity
(OSC)
Polyadenosines on a clay surface
Randomness
Random Sequence Complexity
(RSC)
Stochastic ensembles
-Increasing complexity >
Minimal Uncertainty (P = l.O)
Low Shannon bit content
Maximum compressibility
Most patterned
Maximum Uncertainty
High Shannon bit content
Minimum compressibility
Least patterned
Winter 2007
18
FIGURE 2
Superimposilion of Kolmogorov compression (2nd dimension: Y1 axis) and FSC (3rd
dimension: Z axis) onto the single dimension of Figure 1 ’s linear vector graph. The Y1
axis plane plots the decreasing degree of algoritlmiic compressibility as complexity
increases from order towards randomness. The Y2 (Z) axis plane shows where along the
same order-complexity gradient (X-axis) that highly instnictional and prescriptive
sequences are generally found. The Functional Sequence Complexity (FSC) curve
includes all algoritlmiic sequences that work at all (W). The peak of this curv^e (w*)
represents “what works best.” (Used witli permission from: Abel, David L., and Jack. T.
Trevors (2005), "Three subsets of sequence complexity and their relevance to
biopolymeric information." Theoretical Biology’ and Medical Modeling 2:29, open access
at http://www.tbiomed.eom/content/22/2 1 /29.)
Y2 (Z) Peak algorithmic utility’ = w* Functional
Order
Low uncertainty'
Few bits
Randomness
Complexity High uncertainty'
Many bits
Washington Academy of Sciences
19
FIGURE 3
A dendrogram showing ail possible seqnenees (branehes or paths) of decision node
options, “w*” represents the best algorithmic patli to achieve maximum function. “W”
includes all paths with any degree of utility. Notice that all paths contain equal (n) bits
of Shannon ‘‘infonnation” regardless of whether the sequence of specific choice
commitments accomplishes anything useful.
Node:
1st 2^
2nd 2^
3rd 2^
4th 2'
function out of 2" branches
^
1 bit
■ 2 branches
f 2 bits
4 branches
3 bits
8 branches
4 bits
pt/j pip 1^
ri n n ri
/ y V/*
2” - W fail What “works” best 2" branches
Winter 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
21
WHAT ON EARTH ARE THEY DOING?
MINING THROUGH THE AGES, AND ITS INFLUENCE ON AMERICAN LIFE
Michael Duffy*
Abstract
Tliis paper provides the fundamentals of how mining is conducted and
how it has progressed over the centuries, providing background to help
in understanding recent mining disasters. It touches upon the influence
of mining on American history, economics, and culture, demonstrating
how this basic industry affects our daily lives in ways that are not
always obvious. Butte. Montana, offers a paradigm for discussing tlie
warp and woof of mining. Butte’s history, like that of mining, is one of
boom and bust, ingenuity and folly, heroism and treachery, devastation
and resurgence.
‘‘At the Beginning”
About four and a half billion years ago, mountains began
forming on the surface of the Earth by means of a process called orogeny.
The Earth had begun as a cloud of dust and gas that gradually cooled,
leaving a deep interior core surrounded by a zone of heavy rock, known as
the mantle, and then further surrounded by a thin layer called the crust.
The crust is not uniform, but is composed of a series of
interlocking plates that move against, above, and below each other. That
movement results in earthquakes, volcanoes, and the formation of
mountains. As this activity took place, molten rock, called magma,
migrated from the Earth’s mantle into the Earth’s crust and formed
igneous rock. The intense heat from this activity, however, also brought
along fluids and gases containing minerals that fused into the igneous
* Michael Duffy is chainnan of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission:
however, this paper represents only his personal views and experience with the mining
industry, not the views of the Commission. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission is an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and
appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Federal Mine Safety tmd Health
Amendments Act of 1977 (Mine Act).
Winter 2007
22
rock. In some cases, these formed veins of relatively pure mineralization;
in other cases, heat and chemical reactions dispersed the mineral
components into various types of crystals.
Where mineralization extended to the surface, it was subjected to
erosion by wind, ice, and water or new mountain building, and was
redeposited as sediment in valleys or lake and river beds. The sediments
either remained in that position or were subsequently covered over or
disrupted by volcanic activity, earthquakes, and mountain building.
The process, of course, is much more complex than that brief
description, but it shows that the location of various minerals in
recoverable quantities relies in large part on random acts of geological
violence dating back several billion years and continuing up to the time
when mammals are believed to have first appeared on Earth - or about
200 million years ago.
As for nonmetallic minerals such as potash, trona, salt, and various
clays, their origins are traced to the evaporation and receding of inland
seas high in mineralization. Coal was produced by organic matter being
buried by forests and seas and subjected to heat and pressure so as to
convert cellulose into a carbon-dominated mineral.
To sum up, then, these stupendous geological processes resulted in
the production of three types of minerals: (1) metals such as gold, copper,
nickel, and silver; (2) nonmetallic minerals such as salt, potash, clay,
limestone, and gypsum; and (3) fuels such as coal or peat.
The Rise of an Industry
Mining may not be the oldest profession, but it comes close.
Archeological studies relating to Paleolithic humans indicate that some
450,000 years ago early humans from the Old Stone Age fashioned
primitive tools and weapons from flint which they discovered in outcrops
of rocks.
The oldest verified underground mine is the so-called “Lion Cave”
mine located at Bomvu Ridge, Swaziland. That mine, according to
radiocarbon dating, existed 43,000 years ago and produced hematite which
was ground into a red ochre pigment. Thus, mining, albeit primitive,
parallels the development of agriculture in human history, reflecting the
Washington Academy of Sciences
23
fact that the ‘‘stuff’ mankind uses to develop and improve civilization has
to be either mined or grown.
Indeed, a popular means of measuring human history is
inextricably tied to mineral extraction and utilization. Thus, we have;
• The Stone Age
• The Bronze Age
• The Iron Age
• The Steel Age
• The Nuclear Age
prior to 4000 B.C.;
5000 to 4000 B.C.;
1500 B.C. to 1780A.D.;
1780 A.D. to 1945 A.D.; and
1945 A.D. to the present.
Although mining in the U.S. came into its own during the 19*^
century, there is evidence that Amerindians developed copper mines along
Lake Superior and traded in copper tools, arrowheads, and jewelry as
early as 7,000 years ago. Prior to the arrival of Columbus, Native
Americans in New Mexico were mining turquoise and coal. With the
arrival of the Jesuits and the Franciscans in the 1700's, silver and gold
mining got their start in the Southwest.
Coal mining in the United States dates back to pre-Revolutionary
times. French explorer Louis Joliet noted the presence of coal in his maps
of Northern Illinois drawn up in 1673. Colonists in Virginia were mining
coal near Richmond in 1701. In post-Colonial times the demand for coal
as a home heating alternative to wood resulted in anthracite coal becoming
the fuel of choice in most American cities by 1830, when more than 4
million short tons were produced in Pennsylvania.
After 1850, bituminous or soft coal, a cheaper and more abundant
substitute for anthracite, began coming to the fore. Its chief uses were as
fuel for steam locomotives and as a source of coke in the making of steel.
From 1850 to 1920, coal output increased dramatically, from about 9
million short tons to 680 million tons annually, and production spread
west from Pennsylvania to Illinois and south to Alabama.
Coal production followed the railroads as they expanded westward
across the continental United States. It was a symbiotic relationship since
the railroads needed coal to fuel their steam locomotives and coal
producers needed the railroads to transport their product to market. The
Great Depression had a devastating effect on the industry, so that by 1932
total output had been halved to about 350 million tons. Thereafter, the
replacement of steam locomotives with diesel engines essentially sounded
the death knell for coal-fired transport.
Winter 2007
24
Two events in the 1970’s accounted for the resurgence of coal,
particularly Western coal, as a primary fuel in the United States - the
passage of the clean air act of 1970 and the Arab oil embargo of 1973-74.
The Clean Air Act mandated reductions in sulfur dioxide from coal-fired
power plants, thus providing incentives for power plants to purchase
Western U.S. coal which, while lower in BTU content, was also
significantly lower in sulfur than its Eastern U.S. counterpart. The
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 provided incentives for
electricity generating plants to switch from oil to coal in order to reduce
oil dependency on unreliable foreign sources. (This should sound familiar
to those following energy legislation today.) The upshot of these
legislative initiatives was for Western states to surpass their Eastern
counterparts as leaders in coal production and to boost the overall annual
output of coal to over 1 billion short tons per year.
The Lure of Gold
From the time of the Renaissance, the quest for precious metals,
particularly gold, has served as an impetus for exploration and expansion.
European explorers set sail in search of mineral wealth. The conquistadors
searched in vain for the Seven Cities of Gold. Likewise, throughout the
19‘^ Century, gold rushes provided the spur for westward expansion and
the ultimate development of the U.S. metals industry.
Once gold was discovered at Sutter’s Mill in California in 1849,
waves of gold seekers fanned out across the upper mid-west and far west
hoping to strike it rich. In some cases they did. As the easy gold played
out in California, new and bigger bonanzas were found in Nevada,
Colorado and Idaho, the most notable being the Comstock Lode in Nevada
(More on that later).
The ironic outcome of this widespread gold fever, however, was
that in their search for gold, miners with a sense of proportion discovered
other minerals which, while not as valuable as gold, were much more
lucrative to exploit because of their vast quantities. Miners looking for
gold in Idaho found silver, lead, and zinc instead. Miners looking for gold
in Michigan and Minnesota found iron ore instead. And miners looking
for gold in Montana and Arizona found copper instead. In the end, it was
gold’s metallic stepchildren who ultimately accounted for the
extraordinary creation of wealth in the Western United States.
Washington Academy of Sciences
25
The Mining Process
To briefly summarize how mining and mineral processing are
carried out: there are two types of mining — underground mining and
surface mining. Surface coal mining can also be called open-cast mining,
while surface metal or ‘‘hardrock” mining is often referred to as open-pit
mining.
Underground mining can be conducted by sinking vertical shafts
from the surface or by horizontal tunneling on an incline tlirough a surface
entry called an adit. Once the shaft or tunnel reaches the ore body or coal
seam, a number of methods can be used to extract the mineral.
In underground coal mining, the principal methods are room and
pillar mining and longwall mining. In room and pillar mining, the coal
seam is mined by extracting the coal in blocks called rooms, but pillars of
coal are left behind to support the roof of the mine. That support is
supplemented by drilling holes into the roof of the mined-out rooms and
inserting epoxy-covered bolts into the holes to tie the roof into the
overlying rock strata.
In longwall mining, tunnels are driven parallel on either side of a
huge block of coal and then are joined together by a perpendicular tunnel.
The longwall machine, which consists of a giant circular saw on a track, a
conveyor system under the saw and hydraulic shields above the saw, is
assembled in the cross tunnel. The blade then slices across the face of the
coal, and the cut coal drops onto the conveyor system and is transported
out of the mine. After the saw blade completes its pass, the hydraulic
shields are lowered and the whole mechanism moves forward to the face
for another pass of the blade. As the longwall machine progresses, the
mine roof is allowed to collapse behind it. At all times, the miners are
protected underneath the hydraulic shields.
Room and pillar and longwall methods are also used in the
underground mining of soft noncoal minerals such as salt, trona, and
potash.
In hardrock mining, a common method used is block caving.
Under that procedure, vertical shafts are sunk and a roadway system is
constructed underneath the orebody. Mining is then conducted from the
bottom up. As production proceeds, vertical openings called ore passes are
constructed, and as the orebody is mined, ore is dropped through the
Winter 2007
26
passes to the mine bottom where it is collected and transported by train or
truck to the main shaft and loaded onto a hoist and lifted out of the mine.
Ore in a hardrock mine has to be extracted by drilling and blasting,
and dynamite is the common explosive. Thanks to the introduction of
mechanized mining equipment that can slice or chew its way through coal,
explosives are no longer necessary in underground coal mining.
The surface mining of coal is essentially a truck and shovel
operation once the overburden is removed, though some blasting may be
necessary to fracture the coal.
The surface mining of hardrock minerals, or open pit mining,
requires the drilling and blasting of the host rock so that the ore can be
shoveled and transported.
Generally speaking, surface coal mines rarely go below 200 feet in
depth. If the coal seam is any deeper than that, underground mining of the
seam is more economical and practical. On the other hand, hardrock pits
can extend down several hundred feet and require the construction of
benches or terraces along the perimeter of the pit to ensure bank stability.
Once the mineral is extracted, it must be processed. With respect to
coal, it is crushed, washed, and sized depending upon its ultimate use. It is
also tested for its BTU, sulfur, and ash content in order to meet clean air
requirements if it is to be used to fuel an electric power plant.
Metals are processed in many ways, but basically, they are first
crushed and then treated chemically to separate the product from the waste
rock. The material can then be smelted and refined to produce the pure
metal.
The Lifetime of Mines
There are essentially four stages in the life of a mine: exploration,
development, exploitation, and reclamation.
Exploration, sometimes referred to as prospecting, consists of
discovering and then evaluating a mineralized area to determine whether a
recoverable and economically viable deposit exists. Modem day
exploration has traded the pick and burro for satellite imaging, soil and
vegetation analysis, and seismic, magnetic and radiometric measurements.
Once a potential orebody is found, however, old-fashioned assaying must
be undertaken. Core samples are drilled using diamond drills, and the
samples are sent to the lab for analysis. If the initial core samples are
Washington Academy of Sciences
27
promising, the exploration crew will return to the site to drill additional
cores to detemiine the size, depth, and composition of the orebody. The
core samples also serve to identify faults, anomalies, and intrusions into
the orebody by other materials.
Once the orebody has been fully explored and identified as
mineable, it is transformed from being a resource to being a reserve, and
proven reserves are what potential investors or acquiring mining
companies look for when deciding whether to finance production.
Generally, coal exploration is much easier and more predictable
than metal exploration. Most major coal seams have already been
identified, and the mineral occurs in a fairly homogeneous deposit that
varies only in seam height and the extent of the overburden. Metals, on the
other hand, are extremely fickle and elusive. By way of analogy, think of a
chocolate chip cookie ten feet in diameter and four inches thick, baked by
a chef so stingy that he has randomly stirred in only three chocolate chips
that are completely hidden below the cookie’s surface. Now imagine that
you have been given a needle and told you have three chances to pierce
one of the chocolate chips. That’s metal exploration!
The next stage is development and consists of filing environmental
impact statements, obtaining permits, arranging for transportation and
utilities, acquiring water rights, constructing shafts and tunnels for the
extraction and movement of the mineral, and the construction of surface
facilities to support production. That would include mills, storage
facilities, shops and offices, and waste treatment facilities.
Development is then followed by exploitation, the actual
extraction and processing of the mineral. Exploitation can be relatively
simple, such as in surface coal mining where the biggest challenge is
pacing production to meet contractual obligations relating to time and
product quality. Or it can be quite complicated, such as in underground
metal mining where geological faults, equipment breakdowns, or
processing delays can frustrate orderly production.
Last comes reclamation, though in prudent modem day mining
reclamation begins at the time of development and progresses along with
the production phase. Under federal and state laws, mined out areas have
to be backfilled, waste impoundments must be rehabilitated or sealed so
that the waste does not enter the air and groundwater, and the area must be
revegetated and restored to productive use. Under federal surface coal
mining laws, for instance, lands must be restored to their approximate
Winter 2007
28
original contour or adapted to new approved uses such as airports,
schools, or wildlife refuges. In some cases, former mines have been
converted to golf courses and recreation facilities.
Such has not always been the case, so federal law imposes a
reclamation tax on every ton of coal mined, both surface and underground.
The resulting monies are placed in an abandoned mine reclamation fund
which is passed on to the states for use in rehabilitating areas damaged by
historical mining activity, both coal and non-coal. Similar funds have been
established by individual states. Montana, for example, imposes a 22%
severance tax on mining companies to fund remediation efforts aimed at
past mining activity and to allay costs associated with the coal mining
boom such as new schools, hospitals, and public roads.
Mining in American Life
Mining literally affects us from cradle to grave. From the tungsten
filament that produces light in the delivery room to the granite tombstone
that marks our final resting place, mining produces the ‘‘stuff’ necessary
to daily life.
First and foremost is the production of energy. Coal accounts for
about 50% of electricity generation in the United States, while uranium
transformed into nuclear power accounts for an additional 20%.
Some applications of mining are obvious — jewelry, copper pipes,
and coins come to mind — other applications are more subtle. It takes 15
minerals to manufacture the average automobile and 65 minerals to
manufacture the average computer.' .And believe it or not. lipstick contains
two mined minerals; calcium carbonate and talc.
Exhibit 1 show's the widespread presence of mined materials in
home building. As many or more minerals are commonly found in every
day consumer products. Looking at the per\ asiveness of mining products
from another perspective, the Mineral Information Institute, drawing upon
data from the U.S. Geological Survey, has estimated that the U.S.
consumption of minerals in 2005 was about 33,000 pounds per person.
Mining is also prevalent in the economies of several states. Some states
are far and aw ay more mineral intensive than others, but every' state has a
construction industry' and. therefore, must have easy access to construction
materials such as stone, sand, and gravel.
Washington Academy of Sciences
29
Exhibit 1: Minerals in Home Construction
Note: The list shows just a few of the more common minerals used in
building residences; it is not complete.
Source: Mine-Engineer.com.
http://www.mine-engineer.com/mining/min_house.htm
As for the mining intensive states, if one were to make a quick, S-
shaped flyover of the continental United States to view the various mining
districts, we could start in New England, which is noted primarily for
dimension stone-marble and granite - and find the city of Barre, VT,
which has since the 19^^ century produced about one-third of the
memorials and mausoleums in cemeteries and town squares across the
nation. Moving south tlnough Appalachia we would find extensive coal
fields from Pennsylvania down to Alabama and westward to Illinois.
Florida would feature phosphate, while Georgia, Louisiana and
Mississippi would feature clay, salt, and stone. Moving north again,
Missouri would provide lead, limestone and zinc, while Iowa and
Nebraska would feature gypsum and lime. As we cross the Great Lakes
region, Michigan and Minnesota would feature iron and copper, while to
the west, the Dakotas and Wyoming would provide gold, coal, trona and
clay. The Rocky Mountain states from Idaho and Montana down through
Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona would provide gold, silver.
Winter 2007
30
copper, molybdenum, potash, and coal, while in the far West, California
and Nevada would feature gold, boron, copper and silver.
There are currently about 2,100 coal mines and 12,800 noncoal
mines operating in the United States. The vast majority of noncoal mines
are stone, sand, and gravel operations. (Indeed, every county road
department is likely to operate a sand and gravel pit to supply its road
building and maintenance program). As of 2006, U.S. mines employed
nearly 365,000 miners." The average annual wage for U.S. miners is about
$56,000 compared with $40,500 for all industries, but the average for the
ten most mining intensive states ranges from $60,600 in Montana to over
$72,000 in Missouri and Alaska.
As for mine safety, notwithstanding the terrible tragedies that have
recently occurred, safety in the industry has steadily improved. So far in
2007 (September 1), 23 miners have died in coal mines and 20 have died
in metal/nonmetal mines. While there were 47 total fatalities in coal
during 2006, a third of which occurred in the disasters in West Virginia
and Kentucky, there were 22 coal fatalities in 2005, the lowest number
ever recorded in a single year.
By way of comparison, when the current industry-wide federal
mine safety law was passed in 1977, there were 173 fatalities in all U.S.
mines. In 1968, the year before stricter federal regulations were imposed
on coal mines, there were 493 fatalities. In the early part of the 20‘^
century, it was not unusual to experience 3,000-4,000 deaths per year.
The mechanization of mining, which reduces miners’ exposure to
hazards, has contributed to the overall reduction of injuries and deaths, but
tighter federal enforcement of safety and health laws coupled with more
enlightened management practices must also be given credit for the
reduction. (See Exhibit No. 2)
All together, as of August of 2007, there have been 104,621 deaths
in U.S. coal mines since 1900, and 23,538 deaths in the metal/nonmetal
mines, though the noncoal figure does not include stone, sand and gravel
mines prior to 1958. By way of comparison, the People’s Republic of
China admits to about 5,000 coal fatalities per year, but safety experts
generally agree that the toll is much higher - as much as two or three times
higher.
The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the U.S. mining
industry mined about $92 billion worth of coal and minerals in 2006, and
Washington Academy of Sciences
Exhibit No. 2
Mine Safety and Health (All Mines)
31
Coal Mine Safety and Health
that $64 billion worth of nonfiiel minerals were processed into $542
billion dollars worth of products. Wlien those mineral products were, in
turn, manufactured into finished goods, USGS estimates that the value
added about $2.1 trillion to the nation’s Gross Domestic Product, or about
16% of GDP.
Winter 2007
32
-‘The Richest Hill on Earth’"
Butte, Montana, provides a son of paradigm for the histor\' of U.S. mining
in general. Located in the southwest comer of Montana. Butte sits at the
intersection of Interstate 90 and Interstate 15. WTiile the current population
of the cit\^ and the surrounding county, kno\Mi as Silver Bow, is about
25,000, Butte in its heyday approached 70,000 citizens, of whom about
9,000 were miners.
As is usually the case, mining in Butte staned with a small gold
msh fueled by miners who migrated from Virginia City, Montana, now a
ghost town, but then a boom to\^Ti of 10,000 located about 70 miles away.
The first mines were placer gold operations staned in 1864. They were
mildly successful, but were generally played out by 1870, and at that point
the focus moved to silver. Among the early investors in Butte’s silver
resources was W.A. Clark, a Pennsylvania-bom entrepreneur who
bounced around the gold camps of Colorado and ended up making a small
fortune from his gold claim in Bannack, Montana. Clark soon parlayed
those profits into retail merchandising, banking and mineral investing, or
‘‘grubstaking.” Gradually he began buying up many of the more successful
operations in Butte. At about the same time a young Irishman named
Marcus Daly arrived in Butte by way of the Comstock Lode of Virginia
City', Nevada. A close friend of Mark Twain, Daly also struck up a lasting
friendship with George Hearst, an equally rough-hewn miner who staned
with nothing, but amassed a fonune from his claims in Nevada. Utah, and
South Dakota. Though Daly was a self-educated man, it is generally
agreed that he was one of the greatest mining engineers in histor\\
Daly was sent to Butte by San Francisco investors, including
Hearst, to investigate its development potential. Daly purchased tw^o silver
mines and soon was making big money for his backers. He, like Clark,
began to amass additional claims. The great turning point came in 1882,
however, when one of Daly’s mines, the .Anaconda, reached 300 feet in
depth and the silver ore gave way to extensive copper deposits. Daly
immediately recognized the potential and convinced Hearst and others to
invest millions in milling and smelting facilities to wrest the copper from
its complicated hodgepodge of ciy^stallized host rock. Their investment
paid off, and news of the Butte bonanza traveled around the world. By
1884, Butte was producing copper and silver at the rate of $1.25 million
per month, and it was dubbed “the richest hill on earth.” A significant
Washington Academy of Sciences
33
factor in the creation of the bonanza was Daly’s and Clark’s success in
establishing links to markets across the country through rail transportation
supplied by spur lines to both the Union Pacific and Northern Pacific
railroads.
Both Daly and Clark benefited tremendously from the wealth of
Butte, as did their investors. For example, the widow of Daly’s friend,
George Hearst, sold her shares in the Anaconda Mine to the Rothschild
family in 1895 for $25 million dollars, which she promptly gave to her
son, William Randolph Hearst, so that he could build his publishing
empire. Those of you who are fans of Citizen Kane now know where
Charles Foster Kane’s money really came from and where he sledded on
his beloved '‘Rosebud” - Butte.
This wealth generation also served to transform Butte into a
schizophrenic metropolis where rough and tumble miners rubbed
shoulders with poets and novelists like Dashiell Hammett. Butte’s Opera
house featured concerts by Caruso. Sara Bernhardt performed there, and
Teddy Roosevelt visited twice. In his autobiography Charlie Chaplin
recounted his days as a vaudeville acrobat in Butte and allowed as how the
Mining City could boast the prettiest prostitutes in America.
While Daly was content to reinvest his profits in new acquisitions
or improvements in the productivity of his existing properties, William
Clark devoted a good deal of his wealth to becoming respectable. Clark,
like Daly and Hearst, came from humble beginnings, but unlike them, he
wanted desperately to be a patrician. And the way he decided to do that
was to get himself elected to the U.S. Senate. To that end, he became
active in Democratic politics, particularly with respect to the Montana
Legislature, for this was back in the days when U.S. Senators were not
popularly elected but were selected by vote of the state legislatures.
A number of obstacles stood in Clark’s way, not the least of which
was Marcus Daly. Although the two were different as night and day, they
did get along in the early days of Butte’s development. Gradually,
however, each sought to take complete control of the Butte mines by
acquisition and alliances with smaller producers. This rivalry eventually
graduated to a mutual hatred so that Daly made it his business to thwart
Clark’s Senatorial ambitions.
When the Montana Legislature met in 1 899, it was widely known
that a vote for or against Clark could be bought for $10,000. Clark was
reputed to have a war chest of $1,000,000. When the mmors persisted, the
Winter 2007
34
Montana Senate was forced to investigate, and one senator, Fred
Whiteside, testified that Clark’s lieutenants had offered him and two other
Democrats $10,000 apiece to vote for Clark. That bombshell led to the
empanelling of a grand jury. Meanwhile, Clark’s captive newspapers
portrayed Whiteside as a close ally of Daly and called into question the
legitimacy of Whiteside’s own election as state senator. In the end, the
grand jury absolved Clark of any guilt (though rumor had it that the
bribery campaign had moved from the Senate to the jury room). In any
event, on the eighteenth ballot, Clark won the Senate seat with the help of
some crossover Republican and Populist votes.
That would not be the end of it, however. Daly financed a
vilification campaign against Clark in the local papers he controlled and
continued it in the Eastern press. A petition signed by several members of
the Montana legislature and the Governor asked the U.S. Senate not to
seat Clark. The Senate Committee in charge of the investigation concluded
that Clark had obtained his seat by fraud and recommended to the full
Senate that Clark not be seated. Before the Senate could vote, however,
Clark announced that he was “resigning.” At the same time, believe it or
not, Clark’s supporters tricked the Governor of Montana into traveling to a
remote town in California leaving the Lieutenant Governor, a Clark
supporter, in charge back home. Upon being advised that Clark had
resigned, the Lieutenant Governor immediately appointed Clark to fill the
newly-created “vacancy.”
When the Governor returned to Montana, he tried to countermand
the appointment with one of his own. Both appointees and their
credentials were presented to the Senate, which decided to take no action,
and so Montana was without a Senator for the balance of the Senate
session. This scandal and others led eventually to the adoption of the 1
Amendment providing for the popular election of Senators.
Surprisingly, Clark ran again in 1900 and was elected
overwhelmingly with the support of Democrats and Populists who had
united behind the presidential campaign of William Jennings Bryant and
the free silver movement. But in winning the Senate seat, Clark lost the
battle for domination in Butte.
Daly, who died soon after Clark was elected, had, during the late
1 890's, allied himself with the Rockefellers and Standard Oil and formed a
huge trust and holding company that they named the Amalgamated
Copper Company. Amalgamated gradually bought up the entire copper
Washington Academy of Sciences
35
workings of Butte, including Clark’s. Over the next twenty years
Amalgamated evolved into the Anaconda Company which prospered and
dominated Montana politics and economics until the 1960’s, but not
without serious and negative consequences.
In 1917, a fire at the Granite Mountain Mine resulted in the worst
noncoal mining disaster in U.S. history when 167 miners were killed. The
Berkley Pit, an open pit operation begun in the 1950’s in the heart of
uptown Butte, is now mile wide by a mile and a half-mile long, 900-foot-
deep lake of acid water and heavy metals, and the number one Superfund
site in the country. Trees destroyed by the uncontrolled release of sulfur
dioxide from open smelters in the early days of Butte are only now
returning a century later.
Anaconda sought to expand its reach to Central and South
America, including the development of a huge copper complex in Chile.
When Salvador Allende nationalized those operations in the early 1970’s,
it marked the end of Anaconda as a major player. In the mid-70s its entire
operations were bought by Atlantic Richfield (ARCO), but the oil
company couldn’t make a go at it, and by the early 1980's all copper
production in Butte came to a halt. Nevertheless, during that century of
dominance, it is estimated that Butte produced $4 billion worth of metals.
Given that the price of copper during that period ranged between 9 cents
and 90 cents a pound, that is a lot of copper.
Subsequently, in 1986, a new entrepreneur, Dennis Washington,
purchased all of ARCO’s assets and none of its liabilities, and resumed
mining on a much reduced scale in Butte. He established a new open pit
mine that currently employs about 300 non-union miners - a far cry from
the closed shop, full capacity days of Butte during and immediately
following World War IT Nevertheless, Butte has rebounded surprisingly.
ARCO, under agreements with Federal EPA and the State of
Montana, is still funding remediation of the mined out areas and waste
dumps with a long term commitment running to the hundreds of millions
of dollars. Butte’s population is increasing. The Berkley Pit has become a
world-wide destination for environmental engineers eager to test their
various methods for remedying the toxic effects of mining and other
industrial activity. Since mining resumed over thirty years ago, there has
been only one fatality, an electrocution. The entire business district of old
Butte and the surrounding residential neighborhoods, an eclectic mix of
Winter 2007
36
Victorian and frontier architecture, comprise the largest entry in the
National Historic Register.
Butte can never be the wide-open 24-hour-a-day hive it used to be,
nor should it. But the town is engaged in a realistic accommodation to
changing times and priorities. It is also an object lesson in what mining
can produce and what it can destroy.
REFERENCES
“Facts About Coal and Minerals.” National Mining Association:
http://www.nma.org/about_us/publications/pub_minerals_uses.asp
Malone, Michael P., The Battle for Bi^tte, Muiiug and Politics on the
Northern Frontier 1864-1906. University of Washington Press, 1981.
“Mining 101,” The Mining Journal:
http://www.mining-joumal.com/html/Miningl01.html
“Mining,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining
Notes
’ “Minerals in Typical Computers,” Mine Engineer.com.
http://www.mine-engineer.com/mining/minerals_Computer2.htm.
” Mining Safety and Health Administration.
http://www.msha.gOv/MSHAINFO/FactSheets/MSHAFCT10.htm
Washington Academy of Sciences
37
THE NEW INTERNATIONAL POLAR YEAR
Jafar Ila
Capital Science ’08 Intern
Abstract
More than 60 nations are cooperating in Tlie International Polar Year
of 2007-2009. A major question is the effects of climate change on the
Polar Regions’ environment, ecology, and human communities. This
effort builds on the scientific accomplishments of three earlier IPYs.
The International Polar Year (IPY) of 2007-2009 is a
coordinated effort of more than 60 nations performing over 200 projects in
the Arctic and Antarctic parts of the globe. IPY is a multi-disciplinary
approach dedicated to exploring and studying the Polar Regions and their
potential effects on the planet as well as the planet’s effects on these
regions.
The IPY committee is made up of the International Council for
Science (ICSU) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
Their work will be carried out over two years in order to properly measure
a full cycle of seasons for each pole. This will give each pole the full
attention of the scientists and staff who will be participating in the event.
The issue that is paramount to researchers during the International Polar
year will be climate change. The poles will be ideal locations for this due
to their sensitivity to global changes in weather. This sensitivity makes
them a model for what could occur around the rest of the globe. IPY will
also include many studies on climate change’s effect on circumpolar
societies. Since circumpolar societies are finding their ways of life
threatened by changes in the Arctic their abilities to adapt to this change
may shed light on the challenges other societies are facing or could face in
the future.
Jafar Ila is a Freshman at Florida State University. He assisted during the summer of
2007 in preparation for the upcoming Capital Science 2008 conference.
Winter 2007
38
IPY will address six topics as outlined by the IPY committee:
• Detemiining the present environmental status of the Polar
Regions;
• Calculating and understanding past and present environmental
and social change in the polar regions as well as improving
future predictions in the Arctic and Antarctic;
• Understanding the links between the poles and the rest of the
globe, investigating new frontiers of science using the poles
unique vantage point in order to gain a better understanding of
the Earth and space;
• Investigating the cultures of circumpolar peoples (The Scope
of Science: p. 5).
This paper will attempt to outline the goals stated above in the
context of past efforts and future goals by providing a short history of each
of the three previous IPY’s, providing information about some of the more
active countries involved and exploring their individual stakes in the polar
research, and describing some of the experiments being conducted and
their relation to the goals of IPY.
The first IPY lasted from 1881-1884. It involved twelve nations
that established a total of twelve stations as well as a number of subsidiary
stations. The first IPY was considered by the Permanent Committee from
the First Meteorological Congress at the behest of Lt. Carl Wyprecht, who
proposed that the Committee set up a number of new observation stations
in the Arctic in order to take measurements of meteorological and
magnetic changes in the environment. Scientists at this time already knew
that the weather at these high latitudes held some kind of key to the
atmosphere on a wider scale (Luedecke, 2007, p. 56). The main theme of
till ' Y was that the meteorological and magnetic processes of the Arctic
couiG not be observed alone and required the cooperation of many
different nations. So besides establishing permanent observation posts the
first IPY inspired the process of sharing scientific information by
coordinated efforts at exploring the poles.
The second International Polar year occurred fifty years later from
1932-1933 and was organized by the International Meteorological
Association, the precursor of the World Meteorological Organization. This
IPY was proposed as a means of investigating the newly discovered “Jet
Stream.” Forty nations took part in the second IPY establishing 40
Washington Academy of Sciences
39
observation posts to collect data on ''advances in meteorology, magnetism,
atmospheric science, and the 'mapping’ of ionospheric phenomena that
would be used to advanced radioscience and technology” ("History of
IPY”).
The third IPY or the International Geophysical Year (IGY), as it
was called, was a comprehensive array of the global geophysical activities
that spanned from July 1957 to December 1958. IGY involved 67 nations
and a mass of post-WWII scientists who saw a unique opportunity to
capitalize on the technologies created during the war (e.g. radar and rocket
technologies). They didn’t want to limit the scope of the IGY to only
cover the poles though, hence its change in name. The progress made
during the IGY was dramatic; for instance there was ongoing debate as to
the existence of "continental drift,” or the possibility that the Earth’s
continents were once joined and slowly drifted away from each other
("IGY History”). A singular event during the IGY was the launching of
the Soviet (Sputnik) artificial satellite, which heralded the age of Earth
and space exploration and experimentation remotely from Earth orbit
(Garber). The IGY was the most successful operation of its kind up until
that point and served as a model for later international scientific
endeavors. It surely achieved its goals which were summarized in the
NAS IGY Program Report: observe geophysical phenomena and to
secure data from all parts of the world; to conduct this effort on a
coordinated basis by fields, and in space and time, so that results could be
collated in a meaningful manner. ”
The current IPY began on March 1, 2007, and continues through
March 2009. It’s an internationally coordinated effort of 67 countries
partaking in over 200 projects to provide an accurate measure of the new
scientific frontiers that the Polar Regions offer while also seeking to
measure the effect that the rest of the globe is having on the poles and
vice-versa. Climate change tops the list of priorities and the Arctic and
Antarctic regions offer an ideal place to study the changes in climate that
have occurred over the years. This is because the large masses of ice that
make up the poles are extremely sensitive to changes in the global climate.
In fact the Polar Regions are "changing faster than any part of the Earth”
("The Scope of Science” p. 7). As Sir David King, the UK’s chief scientist
states, "If you like, ice is the canary in the coal mine for global
warming.’'(Kinver 2007) Along with this sensitivity of the poles to global
occurrences there is a clear sensitivity of the rest of the planet to changes
within the Polar Regions themselves. One good display of this would be
Winter 2007
40
the concept of positive feed back, where “reduced snow and ice cover
increases solar heat absorption.” As a result of this “the atmosphere and
ocean are warming much faster in some areas of the polar regions than
elsewhere on the planet.” Another experiment measures the extent and
degree of this process. Phenomena such as this are key drivers of IPY
2007-2008 efforts to see, among other things, whether or not human
actions are to blame for any of these changes.
IPY also serves as a point for tackling political subjects,
particularly for countries with great swaths of Arctic land such as Canada,
as well as all other countries because of the potentially global effects of
climate change. First, though, it would be reasonable to address Canada
specifically because it is the biggest contributor to IPY and contains most
of the Arctic territory. Canada also has a large indigenous population that
lives in the northern territories and that governs Nunavut, a sizable piece
of land in the Canadian far north. The interplay between the central
government and this community has been similar to the plight of
indigenous peoples in United States in that material concerns such as oil
and mining treasures often displace communities. The Canadian
government used to move tribes against their will to other parts of the
Arctic in order to cement the central government’s claim to certain lands.
The relocated peoples often stmggled to survive in their newly assigned
homes and settlements which have become rife with drug abuse and
unemployment despite mining exploration in the area. As one of the older
residents of the area explained, “When I was a kid in the Yukon and a
mine opened, the profits went to New York, the jobs went to Edmonton,
the taxes went to Ottawa and all we got was a hole in the ground, which
we could use as a garbage dump — if the federal government gave us
permission.”
Today, tribes have greater power. Any oil, gas or mining
exploration requires coordination with indigenous peoples. This sa«d
several ventures have been stopped because they failed to mediate
conflicts with the people living in the region {The Economist, 2007).
The possibility of melting ice affects the profitability of Canada’s
Northwest Passage as a shipping route as well. The Canadian government
claims that the waters currently blocked by the ice are Canadian property
and not international waters, as other countries have recognized them to
be. The debate is currently meaningless, though, due to the fact the
passage is blocked by floating ice, a situation that may change in the
future.
Washington Academy of Sciences
41
Recently the subject of maritime law and Arctic land ownership
was catapulted to the front pages by the actions of the Russian
government. On August 2, 2007 a submarine headed by Artur
Chlilingarov, a polar explorer/national hero, made its way to the floor of
the North Pole and planted a titanium Russian flag in order to “claim” the
area for Russia. This action elicited a great deal of balking from other
countries. The Canadian Foreign minister Peter Mackay summed up the
international communities’ reaction when he said, “Look, this isn’t the
15th century. You can’t go around the world and just plant flags and say,
‘We’re claiming this territory’” (“Arctic sovereignty”). The Russian’s rush
to claim territory in the Arctic comes after news from the US Department
of Energy that 25% of the world’s untapped oil and natural gas resources
might lie in the Arctic (Haider, Gautier).
This conflict over the Polar Regions isn’t new. One must keep in
mind that it was the International Geophysical Year in the late ‘50s that
inspired the Antarctic treaty of 1959. However, due to the mass of natural
resources that the Arctic contains, it is inevitable that further efforts will
be made to extract what wealth there is. It is in light of this direct, possibly
damaging, human activity at the poles that this IPY will launch
multidisciplinary scientific efforts to help answer questions concerning
climate change and the environment while preparing the grounds for
future research.
The size and nature of current research at the poles is
unprecedented and promises to welcome a new age in polar research that
builds on and far surpasses that of the last three Polar Years. The scientific
research that is being planned and carried out is immense. To accurately
touch upon each topic I will address experiments from each of the six
themes of international polar year.
The first theme is to determine the present environmental status of
the poles, since the poles are vital when it comes to understanding past
and future changes in the area. One example of how this is being
measured would be the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML) which is
a project headed by the Australian Antarctic Division that seeks to create a
record of Antarctic marine life. They have five goals outlined:
1 . “Inventory species of the Antarctic slopes and abyssal plains.
2. Inventory benthic fauna under disintegrating ice shelves.
Winter 2007
42
3. Inventory plankton, nekton and sea-ice associated biota at all
levels of biological organization from viaises to vertebrates.
4. Assess critical habitats for Antarctic top predators.
5. Develop a coordinated network of interoperable databases for all
Antarctic biodiversity data.” (Stoddait, Summerhayes)
The second theme, understanding changes in the Polar Regions
and gauging their future, is led by the Netherlands Institute of Ecology,
Unit for Polar Ecology. The project seeks to describe and quantify
changes within the ecosystem in relation to temperature changes, to
measure changes in the temperature itself (by measuring differences in
CO2 levels), by measuring the difference between temperature changes in
the Arctic as opposed to the Antarctic, and to measure differences in time
and locale and the nature of experiments already being done at the poles
(Huiskes).
The third theme seeks to address the link between the poles and the
rest of the globe. Representative of this is the study led by the Scottish
Association for Marine Science to measure global impact on the Arctic
and its feedback to the global currents. They do so by measuring the
amounts of certain pollutants in Arctic waters, coordinating with
atmospheric scientists to measure changes in the transport of pollutants in
the atmosphere, and investigating how pollutants run through the Arctic
and eventually back out into the ocean currents (Shimmield).
The fourth theme of the IPY is to investigate new scientific
frontiers at the poles. A good example of this would be Gerald Kooyman,
a researcher at UC San Diego’s Scripps Institute of Oceanography. He has
pioneered the study of emperor penguins. His notable achievements
include discovering the fact that penguins migrate as opposed to staying in
one place, which had been the common belief Kooyman ’s research also
led to the invention of the time-depth recorder which can be used to track
the depth of a marine animal’s dive (Kooyman, 2007).
Fifth, the “IceCube” is “a one-cubic-kilometer international high-
energy neutrino observatory being installed in the ice below the South
Pole Station” (Halzen). The observatory will track particles by using the
300 km thick ice in Antarctica. This is a perfect example of a project that
utilizes the poles as vantage point, as conditions like this don’t exist
anywhere else on the planet.
Washington Academy of Sciences
43
The sixth and final theme of IPY is the study of the circumpolar
societies that occupy the ever changing environment. This theme is
particularly significant because it involves the social sciences as well as
the medical sciences. The Arctic Human Health Initiative (AHHI) is good
example of this effort in that they seek to complete a study on circumpolar
people’s health and health policy. The AHHI has made its mission to track
the health of circumpolar peoples of all ages while also tracking the
correlations between their health and changes in the environment and
government policy (Hassi).
The IPY of 2007-2009 promises to be a concerted effort to
establish a basis for polar research in the Polar Regions of the world. The
IPY will be a multifaceted effort that seeks to build upon past efforts,
measure and record the current status and establish a basis for future
research in the Arctic and Antarctica. This project will include every
discipline across the scientific spectrum, including social science. The
political products of this effort should prove to be significant as well.
Though time is limited in this effort, the foundations that will be set and
the research that will be completed will long outlast the IPY itself
References:
• Allison, Ian. Belaud, Michael. Alverson, Keith. Bell, Robinson. Carlson, David.
Danell, Kjell. Ellis-Evans, Cynan. Fahrbach, Eberhard. Fanta, Editli. Fujii,
Yoshiyuki. Glaser, Gisberl. Goldfarb, Leah. Hovelsrud. Grete. Huber, Johannes.
Kotlyakov, Vladamir. Knipnik Igor. Lopez-Martinez Jeronimo. Mohr. Tillman.
Qin, Dahen. Rachold, Volker. Rapley Chris. Rogue, Odd. Samkhanian, Eduard.
Summerhayes, Colin. Xio, Cunde. ’’Preface.” The Scope of Science for
International Polar Year 2007-2008. February 2007. ICSU/WMO. 14 Aug 2007
http;//2 1 6.70. 1 23.96/images/uploads/LR*PolarBrochureScientific_IN.pdf Page
5 and 7
• Luedeckc, Cornelia. "56.” The First International Polar Yctir: a big science
experiment with small science equipment. 2004. Institute of History of Science.
University of Munich. Munich, Germany. 14 Aug 2007
http://www.meteohistory.org/2004proceedings 1 . l/pdfs/061uedecke.pdf
• “History of IPY.” 14/4/05. WMO/ICSU. 14 Aug 2007
http://classic.ipy.org/development/lhstory.hmi
• “IGY History.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 14 Aug
2007 http:// www.csri .noaa. aov/umd/obop/spohnv history. html
• Garber , Steve. "Sputnik and the Dawn of the Space Age.” Sputnik: The fiftieth
anniversary. 10/1/2007. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA). 14 Aug 2007 http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/
• "International Geophysical Year. 1957-1958." The National Academies.
National Academy of Sciences. 14 Aug 2007 http : /www .nas .cdii/h i story/ i g\7.
Winter 2007
44
• Kinver, Mark (2007/02/26). Climate focus for global polar study. BBC Ncms, p.
Sciencc/Nature
• "Anxiously watching a different world." The Economist (May 21st-27^')
24/05/2007. (retrieved) 14/08/2007
http://economist.coin%orld/la/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9225715
• CTV.ca News Staff (2007/08/02). Retrieved August 14, 2007, from Arctic
sovereignty an 'important issue': Harper Web site:
http://w\w.ctv.ca/ser\4eTArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070802/arctic_claim_
070802/20070802?hub=TopStories
• Haider, Pema. Gautier, Donald "Oil and Gas Resource Assessment of the
Russian Arctic." National Energy Technology Laboratory. Department of
Energy. 14 Aug 2007 http:/7www.netl.doe. gov/technologies/oil-
gas Petroleuni/proJ ectS/T ech_T ransfer/ 15538.htm
• Stoddart, Michael. Summerhayes, Colin. "Census of Antarctic Marine Life."
Census of Marine Life. 14 Aug 2007 http://w^v. coml.org/descrip/caml.htm.
• Huiskes, Ad. "Climate change and polar terrestrial ecosystems: Similarities,
contrasts and lessons in the Arctic and Antarctic (Climate change and Polar
Terrestrial Ecosystems)." International Polar Year. 23/03/2007. Netherlands
Institute of Ecology, Unit for Polar Ecology. 14 Aug 2007
http://classic.ipy. org/development/eoi/details.php?id= 1 0
• Shimmicld, Tracy. "Tlie effect of changing climate on the long range transport
of pollutants to the Arctic (TRANSARC Pollutants)." International Polar Year.
23/03/2007. Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS). 14 Aug 2007
<http://classic.ipy.org/development/eoi/details.php?id=50>.
• Kooyman, Gerald. "Pioneering Science on the Frozen Frontier." Scripps
Institute of Oceonography. 14 Aug 2007
http:/7explorations.ucsd.edu/penguins/penguins_2.html
• Halzen, Francis. "IceCube Soutli Pole Neutrino Obser\'atory (IceCube)."
International Polar Year. 23/03/2007. University of Wisconsin. 14 Aug 2007
http://classic.ipy.org/development/eoi/details.php?id=261
• Hassi, Juhani. "Scientific and professional supplements on human health in
polar regions-the International Journal of Circumpolar Health." AHHI. Arctic
Human Healtli Initiative (AHHI). 14 Aug 2007
http://www.arctichealth.org/ahhi/projects/eoc_sci-sup_eoi.htm
Washington Academy of Sciences
45
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AT THOMAS JEFFERSON
HIGH SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY:
IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TEACHING INTO
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SMALL-SIZED SATELLITE
Adam Kemp*
Teaching Philosophy
There are two types of teachers in the world. Some fall into a
rhythm of comfort in their curriculum and teach the same thing year after
year, and others evolve to accommodate for new content and methods of
teaching. I embrace the latter and know that the world changes every day
and so should education. Each year provides an opportunity to change and
adapt curriculum to become more in tune with current events, giving
students the opportunity to make real world connections. I choose to teach
in a method considered to be “alternative” to standard methods of
teaching. Having students directly involved in the concepts covered in the
class allows them to apply the knowledge in situations that both utilize
study and hands on experiences. Giving the students the opportunity to
answer the question “why are we learning this” by having them physically
implement the concepts in real world applications not only reinforces the
information, but captivates their interest.
I spent a majority of my public education not satisfied with the
content that was being taught. I knew that parts of my history lessons were
wrong, and my math teachers never gave me application to my formulas.
This is the primary reason for my investigation into educational methods
that extend beyond typical and focus on the futures of my students. School
should be a place that children want to go, not just a chore until they
graduate.
Adam Kemp received a Bachelor of Science degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State University in Technology Education in 2005. He began teaching at Thomas
Jefferson in the fall of 2005 and during his first two years there has taught courses in
ninth grade Design and Technology, tenth grade Design and Technology, and Systems
Engineering. Currently he is acting as Lab Director of the Energy Systems Laboratory
and continues to teach the course in Systems Engineering.
\AAnter 2007
i
46
One method of developing a firm understanding of concepts
covered in the classroom is to give the students the opportunity to control
the outcome of a project. This type of activity allows the students to take
on some of the responsibility initially controlled by the teacher and can
begin to build confidence in a leadership position. The students choose
roles to maintain and delegate responsibility so that everyone contributes
and in the event that one child is falling behind, the rest of the group is in
charge of maintaining a balance of responsibility. Student run projects are
often times more difficult than standard lecture based learning. It is in this
type of project that the teacher has to take a side-line role, while still being
the primary leader of the group. I have implemented this type of learning
at all levels of high school education. It has proven to be an effective way
to get students directly involved in both large and small scale projects.
Although the students are working as a team, each student is responsible
for a piece of the project. This type of delegation eliminates the chances of
one student doing less work then others. This alternative method of setting
up a class for a large scale project is what I have staictured my Systems
Engineering course upon.
Systems Engineering
The concept for a Systems Engineering course at Thomas Jefferson
High School for Science and Technology was first conceived by Thomas
Jefferson graduate Jason Ethier, who presented our administration with the
idea that we could become the first high school to produce a small sized
satellite. The school’s Excelsior club became the basis for educating
students in space-based topics that Jason had covered while interning for
Orbital Sciences Corporation. During the club meetings Jason began to
investigate the possibility of constructing a small lOcm^ factor satellite
based on a design produced by California Polytechnic State University,
dubbed the “CubeSat.” Further correspondence was held between Orbital
Sciences Corporation and a partnership was established to have a Systems
Engineering class created to be the platform for the satellite project. At the
end of my first year of teaching at Thomas Jefferson, Joshua Strong, the
former head of the Science and Technology department, offered me the
opportunity to teach said course. I accepted this opportunity and felt that it
would be a good chance to implement my teaching methodologies into a
much higher level project than I was then accustomed to. The initial class
consisted of 14 students ranging from sophomores to seniors, all with
varying backgrounds that could contribute something different to the
group.
Washington Academy of Sciences
47
Systems Engineering at Thomas Jefferson became a course that is
designed to bring High School students into an engineering environment
where they learn to collaborate as a team around a common large-scale
goal. Working with industry and professionals, the students in Systems
Engineering will be given first-hand experience with equipment and
environments typically not seen in high schools. For the next three years
this course will be working in direct contact with Orbital Sciences Corp.
to produce a small sized satellite.
The first class of any course is hard to prepare for and I found it
especially difficult in this case. When I started my first semester of
Systems Engineering I had been teaching for only one year, and anytime
you are working with students that are approaching your age, aptitude in
your subject area is of utmost importance. To begin my course I had the
students write a three page paper outlining their opinion of what Systems
Engineering was. The rationale for having my students complete this task
was to establish a precedent for the amount of work required to make this
course a success as well as giving myself a look into the breadth of my
students’ knowledge. This project produced positive results. After the first
day, I had one student drop the class, a bunch of groans and a stack of
papers with very intellectual interpretations of what Systems Engineering
is all about.
After this initial project, the students began to establish the firm
research background needed to determine and justify the satellite’s
mission. The first semester would consist purely of educational research
into both Systems Engineering and into the world of amateur satellite
design and construction. From this research the students began to
formulate what they would present during their first preliminary design
review as mission objectives and goals. I discussed content pertaining to
satellites and orbital theory, as well as basic electronics, construction
techniques and the engineering design process.
Due to my developing understanding of systems engineering, I
relied heavily on the aid of professionals in the field. Approximately once
a month I arranged to have a speaker from different areas of expertise give
presentations to my class as well as offer guidance in response to our
questions. These speakers consisted of volunteers from organizations such
as Orbital Science Corp, AmSat, the Naval Academy, FAA, and
Raytheon. My initial guest speakers proved to be a double edged sword. I
found it difficult to balance the information that I was teaching the
students over the information that was being presented by the speaker. In
Winter 2007
48
some situations, I got the impression from my students that 1 was using the
speaker as a crutch to my own knowledge in the subject area. Although I
found it to be very beneficial on my own behalf to have professionals
come and speak, I later began to converse with the speakers prior to their
presentation to my class. I used tliis time to adapt my curriculum to cover
exact topics that the speaker would cover. This in turn allowed my
students to prepare questions that became more pertinent to issues we
were encountering with their research and helped to maintain interest in
the presentation. Taking an approach on limiting the amount of time that
the teacher stands in front of the class and having someone with a
professional background in a specific topic allows the students to ask
questions and have interactions that would not normally take place in the
classroom, while providing a change in instructional environment.
In addition to investigative research, the students began to
determine the potential mission concepts for our satellite. The students
then presented these concepts to the class to be voted upon based on
feasibility and interest in the topic. These types of discussions are vital to
any projects undertaken, because often wild ideas help stimulate thought
into ideas that would not have normally been conceived. A good example
of an idea that was deemed infeasible was the use of a low resolution
camera to take pictures of the Earth and determine the satellite’s position.
Although this concept is not original, investigative research into our
potential satellites capability and the scope of our course led the students
to decide that a camera was infeasible. From this investigation, the
students discovered that they could use telemetry data and computer
modeling to simulate the satellite’s position and tumble through space
without the use of a camera, a concept that might not have been
formulated without the proposed camera payload. This preliminary design
phase of our project gives the students the opportunity to research all
potential mission concept ideas. The overlying goal is for the students to
use their imaginations and be as creative as possible. Making a decision
via this format helps to generate ideas that not only solve our mission
goals, but produce feasible mission concepts that interest the students.
In most situations the first impression is the most important. If you
present yourself in a professional manner, you are more likely to receive
professional results. During the first year of Systems Engineering, my
students were presented with a multitude of opportunities that required not
only professional appearance but levels of interaction rarely seen in a high
school setting. Our first encounter with such a situation was during our
Washington Academy of Sciences
49
preliminary design review widi Orbital Sciences Corp. My students were
required to dress in formal business attire and to present their research in a
confident and professional manner.
The presentations’ results produced very high level constructive
criticism from the audience. The conversations held between my students
and the engineers were not on the level of high school students, but rather
between professionals. From this opportunity my students were able to
make the connection between researching and producing a presentation
and its implication in to a real world situation.
Our second formal encounter took place on the fifth of December
where the collaboration between Orbital Sciences Corporation and my
Systems Engineering class was formally recognized. During this
conference, Orbital CEO David Thompson and Virginia’s Congressman
Tom Davis spoke and presented my class with the CubeSat kit from
Pumpkin, Inc. This equipment provides the basis for our entire satellite
design. This conference facilitated the interaction of my students with
professionals on the highest level. They spent time discussing issues
related to space and its future with the CEO of Orbital as well as
discussing current political issues related to space with Congressman
Davis.
Finally during Febaiary of 2007, my class was invited to attend the
Embassy of Sweden’s inductance of Christer Fuglesang into the Honorary
Member of Friends of the House of Sweden. We were requested to give a
short presentation to the attendants outlining the students’ work in my
class. During this event, my top two students, Esther Li and Anastasia
Rumiantsev presented an overview of the class as well as its direct
collaboration with the Excelsior Aerospace club. This presentation gave
my entire class the opportunity to witness great achievements in the field
of space exploration. They were able to have a personal question and
answer session with the entire Space Shuttle Discovery crew and were
very inspired by discussions with the astronauts.
The final portion of the first semester included setting up our
ground station; this posed a problem due to my class’s limited budget. Our
agreement with Orbital Sciences Corp. provided us with the necessary
equipment to produce a small sized satellite alone, while the funding for
the ground station was up to us. The development of a ground station
capable of achieving communication with orbiting satellites is mandatory
for the success of my class and allowing for teaching topics that directly
Winter 2007
50
influence the design of our satellite. At Thomas Jefferson a limited budget
has proven to not be a limiting factor of the quality of education that is
delivered. In not having abundant resources, my class embraced our
ground station construction as an opportunity to establish communication
with industry and try to obtain the necessary equipment with limited
monetary requirements. My students began by formulating a wish-list of
equipment that we would require to meet our first year’s benchmarks.
Upon completion of this list, I delegated teams to pursue potential
sources for this equipment. This opportunity was used to educate my'
students on the specific methodology in contacting inside and outside
sources for equipment donations. We discussed proper etiquette while I
conducting phone conversations, how to formally write a letter to *
individuals and organizations, and how to properly thank those who have
contributed. The students were successful in contacting companies such as ;
Raytheon, Aerospace Corp. and Space Quest and received very positive i
results. In all, the fruits of my students’ labor produced 90% of our ground |
station, including complete antenna array, control hardware, cabling, five^
computer workstations capable of running our satellite simulation i
software and 3D CAD, and countless hours of donated time. This section^
of my curriculum turned out to be one of the more valuable. A vast budget '
can make any situation easier, but the investigations and experiences my
students received while having budget constraints provided another real
world application to their education.
After completion of this project my students and I decided to take ■
our ground station and set it up on the bleachers adjacent to the football
field. In my class I had a student who actively took part in the HAM radio i|
community. With the help of my students and my resident HAM we were
successful in communicating with two satellites during that class period. It :
was at this point in the school year that I was fully confident in my ■
students’ ability to achieve our goal of producing a fully functional h
satellite. I cannot remember a time finding myself more inspired.
At the end of the first semester the students focused primarily on \
our mission concept review. This review is utilized to determine the:
forward progress of the project, while analyzing the proposed mission i
goals and concepts. From my experience one of the best ways of pursuing!
a large scale project is to periodically stand back and take into account the:
opinions of minds not directly connected with the project. For our mission!
concept review we invited teachers from science, teclinology andl
humanities, and engineers from both Orbital Sciences and NASA’s Jett
Washington Academy of Sciences
51
Propulsion Laboratory. This review consisted of an hour and a half long
formal presentation conducted by my students to present the current status
of our project. During this time the students presented their proposed
mission concepts and discussed the benefits and potential problems with
each. The students not presenting took notes outlining the audience’s
critiques and comment for review after the presentation. This presentation
proved invaluable during its later review and allowed us to hone our
design to one that could not only be feasible but outline potential flaws in
our design. This type of review can be implemented into any decision
making environment whether industry or classroom. Having outside
opinions critique a project helps to shed light on issues that would have
normally gone umioticed, while opening the door for potential new ideas.
The mission concept review that commenced in the first semester acted as
a building block for the work that needed to be conducted during the
remainder of the year. The students had the opportunity to have their
research scrutinized and, in many cases, were given new research areas to
investigate.
The goal of the second semester was to elaborate on our current
work. The students began to contact equipment manufacturers, investigate
costs, choose components, and further research the feasibility of their
proposed mission objectives. From this research my students began to
construct budgets in order to set guidelines for resources used by each
system. These budgets are a critical component in the design of a project
such as this. Our budgets included power, cost, mass, data handling, and
telecom. With these budgets in place, constraints are put on the equipment
chosen to complete the given task. When this concept was introduced it
produced a new level of complexity into the students’ investigations. Not
only were they worried about finding components that would fit into the
CubeSat form factor, but ones that would fit into the budget as well.
Our final goal for the second semester was to revise and revamp
the overall system design in preparation for the preliminary design review
scheduled for the end of the term. During this review the students would
produce their revised design, component choices and justifications and a
rough system by system overview into the functional layout of the
satellite. As a result of lost time and problems in scheduling I chose to
postpone the preliminary design review until the fall of the course’s
second year. This would give the summer and first quarter of the second
year to further research and refining of our design.
Winter 2007
52
I used this opportunity to allow my students to work on a scaled
version of the satellite project. One of the primary goals of Thomas
Jefferson is to act as a source of new course materials for other schools in
the nation. If a high school could not facilitate the constmction of a space
qualified satellite, there are often other ways of achieving the same results.
When I taught freshman technology I designed a small programmable
microcontroller board, dubbed the Kilroy. The freshman used the board to
learn the basics of programming, robotics, electronics and construction in
the development of a two wheeled robot. When I designed this board, I
took into account its potential usage in courses other then freshman
technology and this came to light in my Systems Engineering course.
During the last month of the second semester I had my students
begin a new engineering design process into the development of a small
scale satellite. Its mission was to produce an acceleration curve as well as
log altitude. My students began by separating into four teams and then
into two groups, rocket design and satellite design. The group working on
rocket design began to research materials, design constraints, engines,
payload deployment and recovery. The satellite group began by
researching the capability of the Kilroy board and the variety of sensors it
was compatible with. From this they began to create circuit designs to
interface with their chosen circuits. Each team had a designated Systems
Engineer that maintained communication with the other group. In the end
the four teams produced satellites based around the same components but
varied in rocket design. On the last day of class we launched the rockets,
produced acceleration and altitude curves, and successfully created a
project that could be completed in almost any high school environment.
From this project my students worked as teams with Systems Engineers
who helped structure and run the operation. Projects like these show that
with limited resources and good teacher determination, big concepts can
be made using small scale projects.
The first year of my Systems Engineering course was a unique
experience. I started the year off without any formal education into the
role of a Systems Engineer. It took a lot of work, talking with
professionals, personal investigation and the help of my students to make
the first year a success. This course takes a level of student maturity to
comprehend that the tasks that they are working on, no matter how menial
they appear, contribute to the greater good. It is very difficult for a high
school student to see that the tasks they take on and the research they
conduct may not be fully utilized until the next year. That producing work
Washington Academy of Sciences
53
for a project that is scheduled to last for three years is even hard for an
undergraduate in college to grasp. This is true in most cases and it is up to
the teacher to produce curriculum that caters to the abilities of the
students. I found it very hard at first to maintain student motivation while
conducting research. I had a mix of students ranging from those who
would immediately become distracted unless 1 had produced a day by day
schedule for them, to those who could carry an investigation through the
greater part of a week without any real intervention.
In my future years teaching this course I will rely heavily on the
lessons I have learned during the first years’ course. Daily journals are
going to be strictly enforced, weekly reviews and projects are going to be
utilized and the students will receive a timeline that is more refined and
manageable. I look forward to my future years of teaching this course and
implementing my revised teaching methods. It is this sort of allowed
flexibility in my teachings that I truly feel that this is going to be a
successful project.
Summer Work
Over this past summer I worked for NASA’s Jet Propulsion
Laboratories with a group of graduate students on a mission to produce a
seismic lander concept to be delivered to the Martian surface in 2016. The
summer began with the formal introduction of the problem at hand from
our mentors, Kourosh Rahnamai and Andrew Gray. Our goal was to
design a small student-built seismic lander concept to be delivered to the
Martian surface attached to the undercarriage of JPL’s Astrobiology Field
Laboratory, AFL. This lander would be required to be entirely self
sufficient, conform to set size and mass constraints and provide seismic
data on a global scale. The rationale for having such a mission is derived
from NASA’s Mars scientific interests and the lack of data pertaining to
Mars’ current stmcture and its history, both past and present.
Our initial task was to delegate the responsibilities that make up a
proper research and development team. These positions included Systems
Engineering, Control and Data Handling, Telecom, Structural Design,
Science and Instrumentation and Structural Analysis. My appointed role
on the team was to act as primary in structural design and as a mentor for
all of the subsystems, including systems engineer. This role has given me
the opportunity to learn in an environment very similar to my own
classroom on a student mn space based project. It was later brought to my
Winter 2007
54
attention that my intended role on the team was to be a Systems Engineer,
which rationalized bringing a teacher into a student program. The reason
that I had chosen to work on staictural design was to give myself the
opportunity to take a student’s prospective and be led by a Systems
Engineer. This turned out to be a very valuable decision and has given me <
the oppoitunity to learn and develop my own methods of working as a
Systems Engineer when I return to my teaching. i
During the next six weeks our team began our preliminary research
and design, working toward our first preliminary design review. This
review consisted of a one hour long presentation focused around our
current work and conceptual design of our lander. For my presentation I
outlined current progress using the CAD software Solidworks, a software
suite that allows the creation of 3D CAD models and structural simulation.
I presented an overview of the current design and how it was derived from
the mission requirements set by the other subsystems. It was my goal as
structural designer to flilfill all of the requirements set by other
subsystems while producing a design that was structurally sound, low in
mass and within small size constraints. Results of the PDR yielded
commentary into the revisions that needed to be made in order to produce
a design with higher fidelity.
The rest of the summer was oriented toward revising our design to
accommodate changes in other subsystems, while performing structural I
analysis to ensure that the design was structurally sound. This process
consisted not only of research, but included personal meetings with !
professionals in the areas of research. These individuals have proven to be
a valuable resource and will be utilized again in the future.
Our final presentation. Critical Design Review, was given at the |
end of the summer and consisted of an in depth review of our summers .
work. This presentation outlined all of the work that had been completed |
and justified, including work that needs to still be completed. Overall this
project was extremely beneficial. It has allowed me to better design my
curriculum for this upcoming school year and gave me the background to
properly teach it. I was able to work as a student and observe many
talented professionals in their fields and how systems engineering truly
works.
Conclusion
The upcoming year of Systems Engineering poses challenges not
encountered in my first year. The students will be working with actual
Washington Academy of Sciences
55
flight hardware and implementing the research that has previously been
conducted. From my first year 1 have learned structuring a class to
accomplish a high level task is not trivial. 1 will be implementing a much
more rigorous curriculum and expect much more from my students. The
students will be exposed to more speakers, keeping consistent journals and
properly documenting all of the work that is being conducted. This
Systems Engineering course is a learning process for both teacher and
student. I hope that as my students adapt and learn from this course, I will
do the same, and in the end we will have a successful mission.
Teaching is my passion and I plan on pursuing it for years to come.
Giving students the opportunity to apply their imaginations and use
practical hands on experiences has allowed me to provide an education
that was not available to me in my public education. I look forward to my
future work with my Systems Engineering class and all of the courses I
teach at Thomas Jefferson and pushing the limits of public education.
Winter 2007
This page intentionally left blank
Washington Academy of Sciences
57
WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY 2006
M=Member; F=Fello\v; LF=Life Fellow; LM=Life Member; EM=Emeritus
Member; EF=Emeritus Fellow
ABDULLAYER, SR, KENZHE K Chanisina 82/1-8, P.O. Box 1446, Astana 010000
Kazaklistan, Paviodar Pavlodar 140000 , Kazakhstan (M)
ABDULNUR, SUHEIL F. (Dr.) 5715 Glenwood Road, Betliesda MD 20817 (F)
ABELSON, PHILIP H 10528 Georgia Ave., Silver Spring MD 20902 (F)
ALLEN, J. FRANCES (Dr.) The Southerlands, Apt 213, 600 Mount View Street, Front
Royal VA 22630 (EF)
APPETITI, EMANUELA PO Box 25805, Washington DC 20027 (M)
ARSEM, COLLINS (Mr.) 3144 Gracefield Rd Apt 117, Silver Spring MD 20904-5878
(EM)
ARVESON, PAUL T. (Mr.) 6902 Breezewood Terrace, Rockville MD 20852-4324 (F)
BAILEY, R. CLIFTON (Dr.) 6507 Divine Street, Mclean VA 22101-4620 (LF)
BARBOUR, LARRY L. (Mr.) Pequest Valley Farm, 585 Townsbury Road, Great
Meadows NJ 07838 (M)
BARWICK, W. ALLEN (Dr.) 13620 Maidstone Lane, Potomac MD 20854-1008 (F)
BASILI, VICTOR R. (Dr.) A.V. Williams Building, University of Maryland, College
Park MD 20742 (F)
BEACH, LOUIS A. (Dr.) 1200 Waynewood Blvd.. Alexandria VA 22308-1842 (EF)
BEAM, WALTER R. (Dr.) 4804 Wellington Farms Drive, Chester VA 23831 (F)
BEMENT, ARDEN (Dr.) National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington VA 22230 (F)
BERG, RICHARD E. (Dr.) 8308 Quill Point Dr., Bowie MD 20720 (F)
BERGMANN, OTTO (Dr.) 1039 South 19th St., Arlington VA 22202-161 1 (EF)
BERMAN, BARRY L. (Prof.) Department of Physics, George Washington University,
Washington DC (M)
BERRY, JESSE F. (Mr.) 2601 Oakenshield Drive, Rockville MD 20854 (M)
BIBERMAN, LUCIEN M. (Mr.) 3731 Glen Eagles Drive, Silver Spring MD 20906 (F)
BIONDO, SAMUEL J. (Dr.) 10144 Nightingale St., Gaitliersburg MD 20882 (F)
BLUNT, ROBERT F. (Dr.) 541 1 Moorland Lane, Betliesda MD 20814-13335 (F)
BODSON, DENNIS (Dr.) 233 N. Columbus Street, Arlington VA 22203 (F)
BOGNER, MARILYN SUE (Dr.) 9322 Friars Road, Bethesda MD 20817-2308 (LF)
BOYER, WILLIAM (Mr.) 3725 Alton PI, N.W., Washington DC 20016 (M)
BRANCATO, EMANUEL L. (Dr.) 7370 Hallmark Road, Clarksville MD 21029 (EF)
BRIMMER, ANDREW F. (Dr.) Suite 302, 4400 MacArthur Blvd., NW, Washington DC
20007 (F)
BRISKMAN, ROBERT D. (Mr.) 61 Valerian Court, North Betliesda MD 20852 (F)
BROWN, ELISE A.B. (Dr.) 6811 Nesbitt Place, McLean VA 22101-2133 (LF)
BURNS, EDGAR JOHN 415 Lincoln Ave, Avon NH 07717 (EF)
BUTTERMORE, DONALD O. (Mr.) 34 West Berkeley St, Uniontown PA 15401-4241
(LF)
CAMPBELL, FRANCIS J. (Mr.) Apt 113, 7406 Spring Village Dr, Springfield VA
22150 (EF)
CERF, VINTON G. (Dr.) 1435 Woodhurst Blvd., McLean VA 22102-2234 (F)
Winter 2007
58
CHANDLER, PH.D., JERRY 837 Ccnttrillioii Dr, Mclean VA 22102 (F)
CHERESHNEV, VALERIY A. (Mr.) 91, Pervomayskya, Yekaterinburg 620219,
RUSSIA (F)
CHRISTMAN, GER.A.RD (Mr.) 1116 Tanley Rd, Silver Spring MD 20904 (M)
CHUBIN, DARYL E. (Dr.) 1200 New York Ave, NW, Washington DC 20005 (F)
CHUCK, EMIL (Dr.) Health Professions Advisor Asst Professor Biology, 4400
University Drive, MS 2C4, Fairfax VA 22030 (M)
CLINE, THOMAS LYTTON (Dr.) 13708 Sherw^ood Forest Drive, Silver Spring MD
20904 (F)
CLORE, GIDEON MARIUS (Dr.) Lab of Chemical Physics, Bldg 5, Rm. B 1-301,
NIDOK, National Instiuites of Health, Bethesda MD 20892 (F)
COATES, JOSEPH F. (Mr.) Apt. 401 Tilden Gardens, 3930 Connecticut Ave. NW,
Washington DC 20008 (F)
COATES, VARY T. (Dr.) Apt. 401 Tilden Gardens, 3930 Connecticut Ave. NW,
Washington DC 20008 (F)
COFFEY, TIMOTHY P. (Dr.) 976 Spencer Rd., McLean VA 22102 (F)
COHEN, MICHAEL P. (Dr.) 1615 Q. St. NW T-I, Washington DC 20009-6310 (LF)
COHEN, ROBERTA (Dr.) 3039 Dent Place NW. Washington DC 20007 (F)
COLE. JAMES H. (Mr.) 9404 Fairpine Lane. Great Falls VA 22066 (M)
CONLEY, ROBERT E. (Dr.) Conley & Associates, Inc., 9001 Saunders Lane, Bethesda
MD 20817(F)
COOPER, KENNETH W. (Dr.) 4497 Picacho Drive, Riverside CA 92507-4873 (EF)
CORONA. ELIZABETH T 3003 Van Ness Street, NU^ #W316, Washington DC 20008
(M)
COSTRELL, LOUIS (Mr.) Apt 640, 1801 East Jefferson St, Rockville MD 20852 (EF)
CREVELING, CYRUS R. (Dr.) 4516 Amherst Lane, BeUiesda MD 20814 (F)
CURRIE. S.J., C. L. (Rev.) Pres., Assn of Jesuit, Colleges & Universities, One Dupont
Circle NW #405, Washington DC 20036 (F)
DAVIS, DANIEL (Dr.) 6324 N. 24th St., Arlington VA 22207 (M)
DAVIS, ROBERT E. (Dr.) 1793 Rochester Street, Crofton MD 21 1 14 (F)
DEDRICK, ROBERT L. (Dr.) 1633 Warner Avenue, McLean VA 22I0I (EF)
DEAN, DONNA (Dr.) 29 Eldwick Court, Potomac MD 20854-2027 (F)
DENG, FRANCIS M. (Dr.) 708 Highland Ave. NW, Washington DC 20012 (F)
DEUTSCH, STANLEY (Dr.) 7109 Laverock Lane. Betliesda^MD 20817 (EF)
DOCTOR. NORMAN (Mr.) 6 Tegner Court, Rock\’iIle MD 20850 (EF)
DONALDSON. EVA G. (Ms.) 3941 Ames St NE, Washington DC 20019 (F)
DONALDSON. JOHANNA B. (Mrs.) 3020 North Edison Street, Arlington VA 22207
(EF)
DUBEY, SATYA D. (Dr.) 7712 Groton Road, West Bethesda MD 20817 (EF)
DUNCOMBE, RAYNOR L. (Dr.) 1804 Vance Circle, Austin TX 78701 (F)
DU PONT. JOHN E. (Mr.) Fox Cather, Inc., Fox Mountain. Inc., P.O. Box 585,
Pittsburgh PA 1 9073 (F)
DURRANI. SAj"(Dr.) 1 75 1 3 Lafayette Dr, Olney MD 20832 (EF)
EDINGER, STANLEY EVAN (Dr.) Apt #1016, 5801 Nicholson Lane, North Bethesda
MD 20852 (F)
EISNER. MILTON PHILIP (Dr.) 1565 Hane Street, McLean VA 22101-4439 (F)
EL KHADEM, HASS AN (Dr.) Dept, of Chemistry, American University, Washington
DC 20016-8014 (EF)
ENDO, BURTON Y. (Dr.) 1010 Jigger Court, Aimapolis MD 21401-6886 (EF)
Washington Academy of Sciences
59
ESKANDARIAN, ELI (Dr.) 1 109 Shipman Lane, McLean VA 22101, USA (F)
ETTER, PAUL C. (Mr.) 16609 Bethayres Road, Rockville MD 20855-2043 (F)
FASANELLI, FLORENCE (Dr.) 4711 Davenport Street, Washington DC 20016 (F)
FAULKNER, JOSEPH A. (Mr.) 2 Bay Drive, Lewes DE 19958 (F)
FAUST, WILLIAM R. (Dr.) 2940 Karen Dr, Chesapeake Beach MD 20732-3845 (F)
FAY, ROBERT E. (Dr.) 7252 Greentree Rd, Betliesda MD 20817 (F)
FIELDER, WILLIAM (Mr.) 1633 Q St. NW, Apartment 303, Washington DC 20009 (M)
FINKELSTEIN, ROBERT (Dr.) 1 1424 Palatine Drive, Potomac MD 20854-1451 (M)
FITZPATRICK, NEAL (Mr.) Apartment 305-A, 3900 Cathedral Avenue NW,
Washington DC 20016 (M)
FLOURNOY, NANCY (Dr.) 3105 Trailside Dr., Columbia MO 65203-5817 (F)
FOCKLER, HERBERT H. (Mr.) 10710 Lorain Avenue, Silver Spring MD 20901 (EF)
FORZIATI, ALPHONSE F. (Dr.) 65 Heritage Dr., Unit 6, Cleveland GA 30528 (EF)
FRANKLIN, JUDE E. (Dr.) 7616 Carteret Road, Bethesda MD 20817-2021 (F)
FREEMAN, ERNEST R. (Mr.) 5357 Strathmore Avenue, Kensington MD 20895-1 160
(EF)
FREEMAN, HARVEY 1503 Sherwood Way. Eagan MN 55122 (F)
GAUNAURD, GUILLERMO C. (Dr.) 4807 Macon Road, Rockville MD 20852-2348 (F)
GEBBIE, KATHARINE B. (Dr.) Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, MS 8400, Gaithersburg MD 20899-8400 (F)
GHAFFARl, ABOLGHASSEM (Dr.) 13129 Chandler Blvd, Sherman Oaks CA 91401-
6040 (LF)
GIBBON, JOROME (Mr.) 31 1 Pennsylvania Avenue, Falls Church VA 22046 (F)
GIBBONS, JOHN H. (Dr.) Resource Strategies, P.O. Box 379, The Plains VA 20198 (F)
GIBSON, DOUGLAS 9631 Boyett Ct, Fairfax VA 22032 (M)
GIFFORD, PROSSER (Dr.) 540 N. St. SW59 Penzance Rd, Woods Hole MA 02543 (F)
GLASER, HAROLD (Dr.) 1902 Berryman Street, Berkeley CA 94709-1919 (EF)
GLAZE, JOHN (Mr.) 658 E St., S.E., Washington DC 20003 (F)
GLUCKMAN, ALBERT G. (Mr.) 18123 Homeland Drive, Olney MD 20832 (EF)
GOODALL, JANE (Dr.) The Jane Goodall Institute, 4245 Fairfax Dr Ste 600. Arlington
VA 22203-1698 (F)
GORDON, NANCY M Associate Director forStrategic Planning and Innovation, US
Census Bureau, HQ Rm: 8H128, Washington DC 20233 (F)
GOULD, RICHARD G. Telecommunications Systems, 3643 Upton Street, NW,
Washington DC 20008 (F)
GRAY, JOHN e" (Mr.) PO Box 489, Dahlgren VA 22448-0489 (M)
GRAY, MARY (Professor) Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer
Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington
DC 20016(F)
GREENOUGH, M. L. (Mr.) Greenough Data Assoc., 616 Aster Blvd., Rockville MD
20850 (EF)
GUDE, GILBERT (The Honorable) 54 1 1 Duvall Drive, Bethesda MD 208 16-1871 (F)
GUPTA, PRADEEP KUMAR (Dr.) 830 1 Arlington Blvd. #405, Fairfax VA 22 1 82 (F)
GUTERMUTH, PAUL-GEORG (Dr.) IM Wingert 28, 53604 Bad Honnef , GERMANY
(EF)
HACK, HARVEY (Dr.) Ocean Systems, Northrop Grumman Corp., POP Box 1488, MS
! 9105, Annapolis MD 21404 (F)
HACSKAYLO, EDWARD (Dr.) 7949 N Sendero Uno, Tucson AZ 85704-2066 (EF)
Winter 2007
60
HAIG, SJ, FRANK R. (Rev.) Loyola College, 4501 North Charles St, Baltimore MD
2121()(F)
HAMMER. DAVID (Dr.) Curriculum & Instniction, University of Maryland, College
Park Maryland 20742 (M)
HANEL, RUDOLPH A. (Dr.) 3881 Bridle Pass, Ann Arbor MI 48108-2264 (EF)
HARR, JAMES W. (Mr.) 180 Strawberry' Lane, Centreville MD 21617 (F)
HAYNES, ELIZABETH D. (Mrs.) 7418 Spring Village Dr.. Apt. CS 422, Sprinsfield
VA 22150-4931 (M)
HAZAN, PAUL 14528 Chesterfield Rd, Rockville MD 20853 (F)
HEANEY, JAMES B. 6 Olive Ct, Greenbelt MD 20770 (M)
HERBST, ROBERT L. (Mr.) 4109 Wynnwood Drive, Armadale VA 22003 (LF)
HEYER. W. RONALD (Dr.) MRC 162, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution.
Washington DC 20013-7012 (F)
HIBBS, EUTHYMIA D. (Dr.) 7302 Durbin Terrace. Bethesda MD 20817 (M)
HILL, CHRISTOPHER T (Dr.) GMU, Original Building Room 236. Mail Stop 3B1,
3401 Fairfax Drive. Fairfax VA 22030 (F)
HIRSHON. ROBERT Directorate for Human Resources Programs, AAAS. 1200 New
York Ave. NW, Washington DC 20005 (F)
HOFFELD, J. TERRELL (Dr.) 1 1307 Ashley Drive. Rockville MD 20852-2403 (F)
HOLLAND, PH.D., MARK A. 201 Oakdale Rd., Salisbury MD 21801 (M)
HOLLINSHEAD, ARIEL (Dr.) 23465 Harbor View Rd. #622, Pimta Gorda FL 33980-
2162 (EF)
HONIG, JOHN G. (Dr.) 7701 Glermiore Spring Way, Betliesda MD 20817 (LF)
HOOVER, LARRY A. (Mr.) 1541 Stableview Drive, Gastonia NC 28056-1658 (M)
HOROWTZ, EMANUEL (Dr.) Apt 618, 3100 N. Leisure World Blvd, Silver Spring
MD 20906 (EF)
HOWARD, SETHANNE (Dr.) 5526 Dor>' Lane, Columbia MD 21044 (M)
HOWARD-PEEBLES, PATRICIA (Dr.) 1457 Cattle Baron Court. Fairview TX 75069
(EF)
HUDSON, COLIN M. (Dr.) 107 Lambeth Drive, Asheville NC 28803-3429 (EF)
HUMMEL, LANI S. (Ms.) PO Box 3520, Annapolis MD 21403-0520 (M)
HURDLE, BURTON G. (Dr.) 6222 Berkley Road3440 south Jefferson St. Falls Church
VA 22041 (F)
HUTTON, GEORGE L. (Mr.) 1086 Continental Avenue, Melbourne FL 32940 (EF)
IKOSSI, KIKI (Dr.) 6275 Gentle Ln., Alexandria VA 22310 (M)
INGRAM, C. DENISE (Dr.) 910 M St. NW #409, Washington DC 20001 (M)
JACOX, MARILYN E. (Dr.) 10203 Kindly Court, Montgomery Village MD 20886-3946
(F)
JANUSZEWSKI. JOHN (Mr.) MSC 5607, 12 South Dr, Bethesda MD 20892 (M)
JARRELL, H. JUDITH (Dr.) 9617 Alta Vista Ter., Bethesda MD 20814 (F)
JENSEN, ARTHUR S. (Dr.) Chapel Gate 1 104, Oak Crest. 8820 Wather Blvd, Parkview
MD 21234-9022 (LF)
JOHNSON. EDGAR M. (Dr.) 1384 Mission San Carlos Drive, Amelia Island FL 32034
(LF)
JOHNSON, GEORGE P. (Dr.) 3614 34th Street, N.W., Washington DC 20008 (EF)
JOHNSON, JEAN M. (Dr.) 3614 34th Street, N.W., Washington DC 20008 (EF)
JOHNSON, PHYLLIS T. (Dr.) 833 Cape Drive, Friday Harbor WA 98250 (EF)
JONG, SHUNG-CHANG (Dr.) 8892 WOiitechurch Ct, Bristow VA 20136-2005 (LF)
Washington Academy of Sciences
61
JORDANA, ROMAN DE VICENTE (Dr.) Batalla De Garellano, 15, Aravaca, 28023,
Madrid, SPAIN (EF)
JULIENNE, PAUL S. (Dr.) 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8423, Atomic Physics Division,
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD 20899 (F)
KAHN, ROBERT E. (Dr.) 909 Lynton Place, Mclean VA 22102 (F)
KALMAN, DAN (Professor) 2744 Calkins Road, Herndon Virginia 20171 (M)
KAPETANAKOS, C.A. (Dr.) 4431 MacArUiur Blvd, Washington DC 20007 (EF)
KARAM. LISA (Ms.) 8105 Plum Creek Drive, Gaithersburg MD 20882-4446 (M)
KATZ. ROBERT (Dr.) Omega-3 Research Institute Inc., Suite 700, 3 Bethesda Metro
Center, Bethesda MD 20814 (F)
KAY, PEG (Ms.) Vertech Inc., 61 1 1 Wooten Drive, Falls Church VA 22044 (LF)
KEEFER, LARRY (Dr.) 7016 River Road, Bethesda MD 20817 (F)
KEISER, BERNHARD E. (Dr.) 2046 Carrhill Road. Vienna VA 22181 (F)
KIPSHIDZE, NICHOLAS (Dr.) Ctirdiovascular Research Foundation, 55 East 59th St.
6th floor. New York NY 10022-1 1 12 (F)
KIRKBRIDE. JR., JOSEPH H. (Dr.) 1001 Devere Drive, Silver Spring MD 20903 (F)
KLINGSBERG, CYRUS (Dr.) 1318 Deerfield Drive. State College PA 16803 (EF)
KLOPFENSTEIN, REX C. (Mr.) 4224 Worcester Dr., Fairfax VA 22032-1 140 (LF)
KRUGER, JEROME (Dr.) 619 Warfield Drive, Rockville MD 20850 (EF)
LANHAM, CLIFFORD E. (Mr.) P.O. Box 2303, Kensington MD 20891 (F)
LASLO, ZOHAR (Dr.Prof ) 10 Haseora Street, Rehovot 76454 , ISRAEL (F)
LAWSON, ROGER H. (Dr.) 10613 Steamboat Landing, Columbia MD 21044 (EF)
LEE, YONG-SOK (Dr.) 10991 Centrepointe Way, Fairfax Station VA 22039 (F)
LEIBOWITZ, LAWRENCE M. (Dr.) 3903 Laro Court, Fairfax VA 22031 (LF)
LEINER, ALAN L. (Mr.) Apt 635, 850 Webster Street, Palo Alto CA 94301-2837 (EF)
LENTZ, PAUL LEWIS (Dr.) 5 Orange Court, Greenbelt MD 20770 (EF)
LESHUK, RICHARD (Mr.) 9004 Paddock Lane, Potomac MD 20854 (M)
LEWIS, DAVID C. (Dr.) 609 Sideling Court, Vienna VA 22180 (F)
LEWIS, E. NEIL (Dr.) Malvern Instalments, Suite 300, 7221 Lee Deforest Dr, Columbia
MD 21046 (F)
LIBELO, LOUIS F. (Dr.) 9413 Bulls Run Parkway, Bethesda MD 20817 (LF)
LINDQUIST, P.E., ROY P. (Mr.) 4109 Fountainside Lane, Fairfax VA 22030-6097 (F)
LING, LEE (Mr.) 1608 Belvoir Drive, Los Altos CA 94024 (EF)
LINK, CONRAD B. (Dr.) 407 Russell Avenue, #813, Gaithersburg MD 20877 (EF)
LIPSETT, MORLEY (Dr.) 1529 Whitesails Drive. RRl, Z-62, Bowen Island, BC VON
IGO , CANADA (EF)
LONDON, MARILYN (Ms.) 3520 Nimitz Rd, Kensington MD 20895 (F)
LONG, BETTY JANE (Mrs.) 416 Riverbend Road, Fort Washington MD 20744-5539
(F)
LOOMIS, TOM H. W. (Mr.) 11502 Allview Dr., Beltsville MD 20705 (EM)
LOVEJOY, THOMAS E. (Dr.) Tlie H. John Heinz III Center for Science,, Economics,
and the Environment, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW. STE. 735 South,
Washington DC 20004 (F)
LUTZ, ROBERT J. (Dr.) 17620 Shamrock Drive, Olney MD 20832 (F)
LYON, HARRY B. (Mr.) 7722 Noahdown Road, Alexandria VA 22308-1329 (M)
LYONS, JOHN W. (Dr.) 7430 Woodville Road, Mt. Airy MD 21771 (EF)
MADHAVAN, GURUPRSAD State University of New York, 143 Washington St #2f,
Binghamton NY 1 390 1 -3 1 08 (M)
MALCOM, SHIRLEY M. (Dr.) 12901 Wexford Park Court, Clarksville MD 20005 (F)
Winter 2007
62
MANDERSCHEID, RONALD W. (Dr.) 10837 Admirals Way, Potomac MD 20854-
1232 (LF)
MARRETT, CORA (Dr.) Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington VA 22230 (M)
MARTIN, CHARLES R. (Dr.) 2604 Aster Rd, Port Republic MD 20676 (F)
MARTIN, WILLIAM F 9949 Elm Street, Lanliam MD 20706 (F)
MARTIN, P.E. BCEE, EDWARD J. (Dr.) 15366 Stillwell Road, Huntsburg OH 44046
(M)
MARVEL, KEVIN B. (Dr.) American Astronomical Society, Suite 400, 2000 Florida
Ave NW, Washington DC 20009 (M)
MATHER, JOHN (Dr.) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, JWST Project Office,
Mailstop 443.0, Greenbelt MD 20771 (F)
MENZER, ROBERT E. (Dr.) 90 Highpoint Dr. Gulf Breeze FL 32561-4014 (F)
MESSINA, CARLA G. (Mrs.) 9800 Marquette Drive, Bethesda MD 20817 (F)
METAILIE, GEORGES C. (DR.) 18, Rue Liancourt, 75014 Paris , FRANCE (F)
MEYLAN, THOMAS (Dr.) 3550 Childress Terrace, Burtonsville MD 20866 (M)
MILLER, LANCE A. (Dr.) 7403 Buffalo Avenue, Takoma Park MD 20912 (EF)
MINTZ, RAYMOND D. (Mr.) 815 Duke Street, Rockville MD 20850 (F)
MITTLEMAN, DON (Dr.) Apt 909, 5200 Brittny Dr. S, St. Petersburc FL 33715-1538
(EF)
MOROWITZ, HAROLD J (Dr.) The Krasnow Institute for Advaneed Study, Mail Stop
2 A 1, George Mason University, Fairfax VA 22030 (M)
MORRIS, J. ANTHONY (Dr.) 4550 N Park Ave Apt 104, Chev^ Chase MD 20815-7234
(M)
MORRIS, P.E., ALAN (Dr.) 4550 N. Park Ave. #104, Chevy Chase MD 20815 (EF)
MOSELEY, HARVEY (Dr.) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrophysics Science
Division, Code 65, Observational Cosmology Laboratory, Greenbelt MD 20771
(M)
MOUNTAIN, RAYMOND D. (Dr.) 5 Monument Court, Rockville MD 20850 (F)
MUMMA, MICHAEL J. (Dr.) 210 Glen Oban Drive, Arnold MD 21012 (F)
MURDOCH, WALLACE P. (Dr.) 65 Magaw Avenue, Carlisle PA 17015 (EF)
NEKRASOV, ARKADI (Dr.) Bldg. 1, 420 Flat, House 4 Kuncevskaja St, 121351
Moscow, RUSSIA CIS (F)
NOFFSINGER, TERRELL L. (Dr.) 125 Echo Valley Road, Auburn KY 42206 (EF)
NORRIS, KARL H. (Mr.) 11204 Montgomery Road, Beltsville MD 20705 (EF)
O’HARE. JOHN J. (Dr.) 108 Rutland Blvd, West Palm Beach FL 33405-5057 (EF)
OHRINGER. LEE (Mr.) 5014 Rodman Road, Bethesda MD 20816 (EF)
ORDWAY, FRED (Dr.) 5205 Elsmere Avenue, Bethesda MD 20814-5732 (EF)
OSER, HANS J. (Dr.) 8810 Quiet Stream Court, Potomac MD 20854-4231 (EF)
OSTENSO, GRACE (Dr.) 9707 Old Georgeto\vTi Rd #2618. Bethesda MD 20814-1763
(EF)
OTT, WILLIAM R. (Dr.) Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8400, Gaitliersburg MD 20899-8400 (F)
PARASCANDOLA, JOHN (Dr.) 11503 Patapsco Dr, Rockville MD 20852 (M)
PARR, ALBERT C (Dr.) 100 Bureau Drive, MS-8440 Gaitliersburg MD, 2656 SW
Eastw^ood Avenue, Gresham OR 97080 (F)
PATEL, D. G. (Dr.) 1 1403 Crownwood Lane, Rockville MD 20850 (F)
PAYNE, ZABORIAM E. (F)
PAZ, ELVIRA L. (Dr.) 172 Cook Hill Road, Wallingford CT 06492 (EF)
Washington Academy of Sciences
63
PERROS, THEODORE P. (Dr.) 500 23rd Str. NW B-606, Washington DC 20037 (EF)
PICKHOLTZ, RAYMOND L. (Dr.) 3613 Glcnbrook Road, Fairfax VA 22031-3210 (EF)
POLAVARAPU, MURTY 8610 Dellway La, Vicmia VA 22180 (F)
POLLARD, HARVEY B. (Dr.) Department of Anatomy, Phsiology, and Genetics,
USUHS, Naval Medical Center, Bethesda MD 20814 (F)
PROCTOR, JOHN H. (Dr.) 102 Moray Firth, Ford’s Colony, Williamsburg VA 23188
(LF)
PRYOR, C. NICHOLAS (Dr.) 2299 Puppy Creek Rd., Amlierst VA 24591 (F)
PRZYTYCKI, JOZEF M. (Prof.) 10005 Broad St, Bethesda MD 20814 (F)
PURCELL, ROBERT H. (Dr.) NIAID LID HEPATITS SECTION, Building 50. Rm.
6523, 50 South Dr. MSC 8009, Bethesda MD 20892-8009 (F)
PYKE, JR, THOMAS N. (Mr.) 4887 N. 35th Road, Arlington VA 22207 (F)
QUIROZ, RODERICK S. (Mr.) 4520 Yuma Street, N.W., Washington DC 20016 (EF)
RADER, CHARLES A. (Mr.) 1101 Paca Drive, Edgewater MD 21037 (EF)
RAJAGOPAL, A.K. Code 6860.1, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC 20375
(EF)
RALL, JOSEPH EDWARD (Dr.) 3947 Baltimore Street, Kensington MD 20895 (EF)
RAMAKER, DAVID E. (Dr.) 6943 Essex Avenue, Springfield VA 22150 (F)
RAMSEY, NORMAN F. (Dr.) Lyman Physics Laboratory, Har\wd University,
Cambridge MA 02138 (LF)
RAUSCH, ROBERT L. (Dr.) P. O. Box 85447, University Station, Seattle WA 98145-
1447 (F)
RAVITSKY, CHARLES (Mr.) 37129 Village 37, Camarillo CA 93012 (EF)
REDISH, EDWARD F. (Prof.) 6820 Winterberry Lane, Bethesda MD 20817 (F)
REINER, ALVIN (Mr.) 1 1243 Bybee Street, Silver Spring MD 20902 (EF)
RHYNE, JAMES J. (Dr.) 1830 Corona Ave., Los Alamos^NM 87544-5767 (F)
RICKER, RICHARD (Dr.) 12809 Talley Ln, Damestown MD 20878-6108 (F)
RIDGELL, MARY P.O. Box 133, 48073 Mattapany Road, St. Mary’s City MD 20686-
0133 (LM)
ROBERTS, SUSAN (Dr.) Ocean Studies Board, Keck 752, National Research Council,
500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington DC 20001 (F)
ROBINSON, MICHAEL HILL (Dr.) 8291 SW Bent Oak Court, Stuart FL 34997 (EF)
ROESCH, DARREN M (Dr.) Unit 808, 7915 Eastern Ave, Silver Spring MD 20910 (M)
ROSE, WILLIAM K. (Dr.) 10916 Picasso Lane, Potomac MD 20854 (F)
ROSENBLATT, JOAN R. (Dr.) Apt. 702, 2939 Van Ness Street. N.W, Washington DC
20008 (EF)
SAENZ, ALBERT W. (Dr.) 6338 Old Town Court, Alexandria VA 22307 (F)
SAMARAS, THOMAS T. (Mr.) 11487 Madera Rosa Way, San Diego CA 92124 (M)
SANDBERG, KATHRYN (Dr.) 3915 Rickover Road, Silver Spring MD 20902 (M)
SAVILLE, JR, THORNDIKE (Mr.) 5601 Albia Road, Bethesda MD 20816-3304 (LF)
SCHALK, JAMES M. (Dr.) 267 Forest Trl, Isle of Palms SC 29451-2518 (EF)
SCHINDLER, ALBERT I. (Dr.) 6615 Sulky Lane, Rockville MD 20852 (F)
SCHMEIDLER, NEAL F. (Mr.) Omni Engr & Technology, Inc, 822()0Greensboro Dr
#900, McLean VA 22102 (F)
SCHMIDT, CLAUDE H. (Dr.) 1827 NorUi 3rd Street, Fargo ND 58102-2335 (EF)
SCHROFFEL, STEPHEN A. 1860 Stratford Park PI #403, Reston VA 20190-3368 (F)
SCRIBNER, BOURDON F. (Mr.) 9109 River Crescent Dr., Annapolis MD 21401-7731
(EF)
SEBRECHTS, MARC M. (Dr.) 7014 Exeter Road, Bethesda MD 20814 (F)
Winter 2007
64
SEITZ, FREDERICK (Dr.) Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York NY
10021 (EF)
SEVERINSKY, ALEX J. (Dr) 4707 Foxhall Cresent Dr, Washington DC 20007 (M)
SHAFRIN, ELAINE G. (Mrs.) 4850 Connecticut Ave NW Apt 818, Washington DC
20008 (EF)
SHENGELIA, RAMAZ (Prof.) Dean of the Medieal Faculty, University of Tbilissi, 7
Asatiani Street, Tbilissi 0177 , GEORGIA (F)
SFIETLER, STANWYN G. (Dr.) 142 E Meadowland Ln., Sterling VA 20164-1 144 (EF)
SHRAKE, KAREN (Mrs.) 7313 Farthest Thunder Court, Columbia MD 21046 (M)
SHRIER, STEFAN (Dr.) PO Box 19139. Alexiindria VA 22320-0139 (F)
SHROPSHIRE, JR, W. (Dr.) Omega Laboratory, P.O. Box 189, Cabin Jolm MD 20818-
0189 (LF)
SILBER, CRISTINA C. 7803 Beard Ct, Falls Church VA 22043 (M)
SILVER, DAVID M. (Dr.) Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road,
Laurel MD 20723-6099 (M)
SIMHA, ROBERT (Dr.) Dept. Macromolecular Sci.. Case-Western Reserve University,
Cleveland OH 44106-7202 (EF)
SIMPSON, MICHAEL M. (Dr.) 101 Independence SE, CRS RSI LM423, Washington
DC 20540-7450 (LM)
SLACK, LEWIS (Dr.) Carol Woods #1 1 14, 750 Weaver Dairy Road, Chapel Hill NC
27514-1441 (EF)
SMITH, THOMAS E. (Dr.) Dept of Biochemistry & Molecular Biol., College of
Medicine, Howard University, 520 W. Street, NW, Washington DC 20059 (LF)
SODERBERG, DAVID L. (Mr.) 403 West Side Dr. Apt. 102, Gaithersburg MD 20878
(M)
SOLAND, RICHARD M. (Dr.) SEAS, George Washington Univ., Washington DC
20052 (LF)
SOLDIN, STEVEN J. (Dr.) 6308 Walhonding Road, Bethesda MD 20813 (F)
SOUSA, ROBERT J. (Dr.) 168 Wendell Road, Shutesbury MA 01072 (EF)
SPANO, MARK (Dr.) 239 Chestertown Street. Gaithersburg MD 20878 (F)
SPARGO, WILLIAM J. (Dr.) 9610 Cedar Lane, Betliesda MD 20814 (F)
SPILHAUS, JR, A.F. (Dr.) 10900 Picasso Lane, Potomac MD 20854 (F)
STEGUN, IRENE A. (Ms.) 93 Park Ave #1406, Danbury CT 06810-7625 (F)
STERN, KURT H. (Dr.) 103 Grant Avenue, Takoma Park MD 20912-4328 (EF)
STIFF. LOUIS J. (Dr.) 332 N St., SW.. Washington DC 20024 (EF)
STRAUSS, SIMON W. (Dr.) 4506 Cedell Place, Camp Springs MD 20748 (LF)
SYKES, ALAN O. (Dr.) 304 Mashie Drive, Vienna VA 22180 (EM)
SZTEIN, ESTER (Dr.) 8509 Cottage St., Vienna VA 22180 (M)
TABOR, HERBERT (Dr.) NIDDK, LBP, Bldg 8, Rm. 223, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda MD 20892-0830 (M)
TAMARGO, JUAN (Dr.) Guzman El Bueno 100, 3 A, 28003 Madrid, SPAIN (F)
TAUBENBERGER, JEFFERY KARL (Dr.) 6434 Melia St., Springfield VA 22150-1 144
(F)
TAYLOR, P.E., WILLIAM B. (Mr.) 4001 Belle Rive Terrace, Alexandria VA 22309 (M)
TEICH, ALBERT H. (Dr.) Science & Policy Programs, American Association for the
Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington DC
20005 (F)
THOMPSON, F. CHRISTIAN (Dr.) 661 1 Green Glen Ct, Alexandria VA 22315-5518
(LF)
Washington Academy of Sciences
65
TIMASHEV, SLAVA A. (Mr.) 3306 Potlerton Dr., Falls Church VA 22044-1 603 (F)
TOLL, JOHN S. (Dr.) Washington College, University of Maryland, 6609 Boxford Way,
Bethesda MD 20817 (F)
TOMLINSON, KEITH PHILLIP 3235 Doctors Crossing Road, Charlottesville VA
22911(F)
TOUWAIDE, ALAIN Department of Botany - MRC 166, National Museum of Natural
History, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013-7012
(LF)
TOWNSEND, LEWIS R. (Dr.) 8906 Liberty Lane, Potomac MD 20854 (M)
TOWNSEND, MARJORIE R. (Mrs.) 3529 Tilden Street, NW, Washington DC 20008-
3194 (LF)
TYLER, PAUL E. (Dr.) 1023 Rocky Point Ct. N.E., Albuquerque NM 87123-1944 (EF)
UBELAKER, DOUGLAS H. (Dr.) Dept, of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural
History. Smithsonitin Institution, Washington DC 20560-01 12 (F)
UHLANER. J.E. (Dr.) 5 Maritime Drive, Corona Del Mar CA 92625 (EF)
UMPLEBY. STUART (Professor) Department of Management Science, Tlie George
Washington University, Washington DC 20052 (F)
' VAISHNAV, MARIANNE P. (Ms.) P.O. Box 2129, Gaithersburg MD 20879 (LF)
VAN FLANDERN, TOM (Dr.) Meta Research, 994 Woolsey Ct. Sequim WA 98382-
5058 (EF)
I VAN TUYL, ANDREW (Dr.) 1000 W. Nolcrest Drive, Silver Spring MD 20903 (EF)
VANE III, RUSSELL RICHARDSON (Dr.) 2102 Capstone Circle, Herndon VA 20170
(M)
VARADI, PETER F. (Dr. ) Apartment 1606W, 4620 Nortli Park Avenue, Chevy Chase
’ MD 20815 (EF)
VAVRICK, DANIEL J. (Dr.) 10314 Kupperton Court, Fredricksburg VA 22408 (F)
VIZAS, CHRISTOPHER (Dr.) 504 East Capitol Street, NE, Washington DC 20003 (M)
WALDMANN, THOMAS A. (Dr.) 3910 Rickover Road, Silver Spring MD 20902 (F)
WALLER, JOHN D. (Dr.) 5943 Kelley Court, Alexandria VA 22312-3032 (M)
WARD, SHERRY L (Dr.) 6710 Meadowlawn Circle, New Market MD 21774 (M)
WAYNANT, RONALD W. (Dr.) 6525 Limerick Court. Clarksville MD 21029 (F)
WEBB, RALPH E. (Dr.) 21-P Ridge Road, Greenbelt MD 20770 (F)
WEGMAN, EDWARD J. (Dr.) 368 Research Bldg, Center Computer Statistics MS 6A2,
George Mason University, Fairfax VA 22030 (LF)
WEISS. ARMAND B. (Dr.) 6516 Tniman Lane, Falls Church VA 22043 (LF)
WERGIN, WILLIAM P. (Dr.) 1 Arch Place #322. Githersburg MD 20878 (EF)
WIESE, WOLFGANG L. (Dr.) 8229 Stone Trail Drive, Bethesda MD 20817 (EF)
WINKLER, STANLEY (Dr.) 6413 Earlham Dr, Bethesda MD 20817 (F)
WINTERS, WILLIAM W. 6825 Capri Place, Bethesda MD 20817-4209 (LM)
WITHERSPOON, F. DOUGLAS ASTI, 11316 Smoke Rise Ct., Fairfax Station VA
22039 (M)
WULF, WILLIAM A. (Dr.) Quill Spring, 3897 Free Union Road, Charlottesville VA
22901 (F)
1
I
Winter 2007
This page intentionally left blank
1
1
Washington Academy of Sciences
67
The Washington Academy of Sciences and its Affiliated
Societies Present
Capital Science 2008
to be held March 29 - 30, 2008
at the National Science Foundation
On Saturday and Sunday, March 29-30, 2008, The Washington Academy of
Sciences and its Affiliated Societies will hold the third event of the biennial pan-
Affiliate Conference Series, Capital Science 2008. This event will take place at
the Conference Facility of the National Science Foundation in Arlington, VA,
within a block of the Ballston Metro Stop.
With about 20 of our Affiliated Societies participating, the Conference will serve
as an umbrella for scientific presentations, seminars, tutorials, and talks. These
pan-Affiliate Conferences clearly demonstrate that the Washington, DC area is
not only the political capital of the country but, in many respects, the nation's
intellectual capital - with several major universities and government laboratories
that are the homes of an astonishing number of Nobel Prize Laureates.
In addition to the sessions organized by the various Affiliated Societies, the
weekend-long event will feature three major addresses and three plenary
sessions:
The Events:
• The Saturday lunch address will be presented by Dr. Mario Livio, Senior
Astrophysicist and Head of the Office of Public Outreach, Space
Telescope Science Institute.
• The Saturday evening dinner will feature an address by NSF Director Dr.
Arden Bement.
• The Sunday lunch will feature an address by Dr. Maxine Singer, recently
retired (2002) as President of the Carnegie Institute and Scientist
Emeritus at the National Cancer Institute.
i
Winter 2007
68
The Plenary Sessions:
• Tissue Ownership: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Considerations, led by Dr.
William Gardner, Executive Director, American Registry of Pathology.
• International Polar Research, led by the Office of Polar Programs,
National Science Foundation
• Science and Engineering in the Courtroom: Ethics and the Expert
Witness, led by Dr. Mark S. Frankel, AAAS. The presentation will be
preceded by a reception.
Online registration will be available soon. Check the website for
updates at:
http://www.washacadsci.org
Even if you are not a member of the Washington Academy of Sciences or a
participating Affiliated Society, plan to attend the Conference. It is certainly
among this area’s premier events on science.
For questions, suggestions, or other communications about Capital Science
2008, please contact Peg Kay, Chair of the Organizing Committee:
pegt<ay@washacadsci. org
Washington Academy of Sciences
AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS
The National Institute For Standards and Technology
Meadowlark Botanical Gardens
The John W. Kluge Center of the Library of Congress
Potomac Overlook Regional Park
Koshland Science Museum
Winter 2007
This page intentionally left blank
6000 i 1
Washington Academy of Sciences
DELEGATES TO THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
REPRESENTING AFFILIATED SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Washington Academy of Sciences
Room 637
1200 New York Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Return Postage Guaranteed
Non-Profit Org.
U.S. Postage
PAID
Alexandria. VA
Permit NO. 6003
ERNST MAYR LIBRARY
MUSEUM COMP ZOOLOGY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
26 OXFORD ST
CAMBRIDGE. MA 02138-2902
2044
093 394 732