S MAUMBÜS
Journal of West African Ornithology
Revue d’Ornithologie de l’Ouest Africain
VOLUME 36 Number 2 September 2014
ISSN 0331-3689
West African Ornithological Society
Société d’Ornithologie de l’Ouest Africain
published by:
publiée par:
West African Ornithological Society
Société d’Ornithologie de l’Ouest Africain
Conseil:
Président: Dr Jean-Marc Thiollay
Vice-Président: Dr Roger Wilkinson
Membres du Conseil:
Nils Robin, P.W. Peter Browne
Secrétaire du Conseil: Dr Joost Brouwer
Trésorier et chargé des adhérents: Tim Dodman
Secrétaire chargé des Réunions: Dr Shiiwua Manu
Rédacteur en chef: Dr Alan Tye
Comité de Rédaction: Dr J. Brouwer, Dr R. Buij, Dr D.T. Cox, Dr O. Girard, Dr P.J.
Jones, Dr O. Lachenaud, Dr M. Melo, N. Robin, Dr V. Salewski, J.-M. Thiollay, Dr
T. Wacher, Dr R. Wilkinson.
Site internet: http://malimbus.free.fr/ inclut le texte complet de tous les volumes du
Bulletin of the Nigerian Ornithologists ’ Society et de Malimbus à l’exception de ceux
des cinq dernières années, ainsi que les tables des matières, les résumés, les index
consultables d’espèces et d’auteurs, et des listes pays avec, pour chacun des pays
d’Afrique de l’Ouest, les références des mentions dans la revue. Webmestre: Peter Browne.
La correspondance doit être adressée comme suit:
— au Rédacteur en Chef, pour les articles à soumettre à Malimbus (Dr A. Tye, PO
Box 31, Kalo Chorio Oreinis, 2616 Nicosia, Cyprus ; <alantye@gmail . com>) ;
— au Trésorier, pour les abonnements (Hundland, Papa Westray, Orkney KW17 2BU,
U. K.; <tim@timdodman.co.uk>);
— au Secrétaire du Conseil, pour les demandes des Bourses de Recherches
(Wildekamp 32, 6721 JD Bennekom, The Netherlands; <brouwereac@orange . nl>) ;
— au Secrétaire adjoint, pour la présence aux réunions ou des suggestions pour
celles-ci (APLORI, c/o P. Hall, A.G. Leventis Ltd, West Africa House, Hanger Lane,
Ealing, London W5 3QR, U.K.; <manushiiwua@yahoo.co.uk>)
— au Webmestre, Peter Browne, pour les questions du site web: <pbrowne@primus . ca>;
— au Président, pour les questions du politique de la Société (2 rue Rivière, F- 10220
Rouilly Sacey, France; <jm.thiollay@wanadoo.fr>).
La Société tire son origine de la “Nigerian Ornithologists’ Society”, fondée en 1964.
Son but est de promouvoir l’ornithologie ouest-africaine, principalement au moyen de
sa revue Malimbus (anciennement Bulletin of the Nigerian Ornithologists' Society).
Les demandes d’adhésion sont les bienvenues. Les cotisations annuelles sont de £15 ou
de €22 pour les Membres Ordinaires et de £35 (€44) pour les Sociétés (les cotisations
peuvent être payées en £ sterling au Trésorier ou en Euro à M. ou Mme N. Robin, 35 rue
Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France; <nils-robin@orange.ff>. Il est recommandé aux
adhérents de la Zone Euro, hors France, de procéder par virement bancaire SEPA (gratuit),
l’encaissement des chèques émis hors de France étant très coûteux. Un RIB leur sera
adressé sur demande. Également, les cotisations peuvent être payées en ligne sur notre
site internet <http://malimbus.free.fr/>. Les Membres Ordinaires reçoivent Malimbus
par courrier ordinaire et les Sociétés par courrier aérien, gratuitement. Un supplément est
exigé des Membres Ordinaires pour le courrier aérien (demander au Trésorier le tarif).
Numéros anciens: Aucun exemplaire original n’est disponible à l’exception de
quelques numéros récents. Cependant, un pdf de l’un des numéros (numéro complet) de
Malimbus ou du Bull. Nigerian Orn. Soc. peut être fourni au prix de 50 % du coût de
l’abonnement de l’année en cours. Merci d’adresser vos requêtes au Trésorier.
Bourses de Recherches de la S.O.O.A.: Les conditions à remplir pour les candidatures
se trouvent dans Malimbus 25: 72-75 et sur le site web, ou peuvent être obtenues
auprès du Secrétaire du Conseil (adresse ci-dessus).
2014
5
Editorial
Our 50th Anniversary
The beginnings of W.A.O.S. came when a group of enthusiasts created the Nigerian
Ornithologists’ Society, in 1964, so this year marks our 50th birthday. In the early days,
almost all of the contributions to the new journal, the Bulletin of the Nigerian
Ornithologists ’ Society , came from expatriates. It is thus gratifying to note several features
of the Society and its journal after 50 years. Above all, we still exist, despite a couple of
periods when it looked as if Malimbus might die; but the Society maintains its relevance,
and its journal has become a prime repository for research on the birds of more than one
third of the continent. Secondly, the articles published in the journal have come to include
an increasing proportion written by West African authors. This is a measure of success in
one of the Society’s objectives: to encourage and promote research by West Africans in
West Africa.
Several features of the present issue in particular are perfectly appropriate to mark our
golden jubilee. The first is that in this issue all the full-length articles are written by West
African authors (the first time this has occurred) and, given that the anniversary is of 50
years since our founding as the Nigerian Ornithologists’ Society, it is doubly appropriate
that two of these articles should come from Nigeria. Further, one of them examines the
changes in the avifauna of the Ibadan area in the 50 years since our foundation, which
happened to coincide with the publication of a key work on the district by John Elgood
(one of our founders) and Frank Sibley. The other re-examines aspects of the avifauna of
the Yankari Game Reserve, which N.O.S. and W.A.O.S. members have studied since our
beginnings. The third article, from francophone West Africa, demonstrates that our move
to a bilingual journal, when the Society’s geographical coverage expanded to the whole of
West Africa, is still valued. And finally, all this is pure coincidence: for anyone inclined to
believe in augury, a set of auspicious signs for the future from West Africa’s birds.
The continuation of contributions from Nigeria is in part due to the stimulus that
is still provided by old-established scholarly institutions there, including the univer¬
sity and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture at Ibadan, along with the
relatively young A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute. We can also recog¬
nize with satisfaction that N.O.S. and W.A.O.S. have contributed to this stimulus.
So, despite some worrying periods for the Society and its journal in the past (and
still, with submissions this year very low), we have good reason to expect ornithology
in Nigeria and West Africa to continue, with its practitioners providing valuable new
knowledge and contributing to the conservation of West Africa’s birds. Surely
enough reason to celebrate.
Alan Tye
66
Editorial
Malimbus 36
50ème anniversaire !
Les débuts de la S. O. O. A. remontent à la création en 1964 de la Nigerian Ornitholo¬
gists’ Society par un groupe d’enthousiastes, et donc cette année marque notre 50ème
anniversaire. Au début, la presque totalité des contributions au nouveau journal, le
Bulletin of the Nigerian Ornithologists’ Society, provenait d’expatriés. Il est ainsi
gratifiant de relever, après 50 ans, plusieurs faits saillants concernant notre Société et
son journal. Avant tout, nous existons encore, malgré deux périodes au cours desquelles
Malimbus put sembler sur le point de disparaître; mais la société conserve sa raison
d’être et son journal est devenu l’une des principales revues scientifiques sur l’avifaune
de plus d’un tiers du continent africain. En second lieu, une proportion croissante des
articles publiés dans le journal ont été écrits par des auteurs d’Afrique de l’Ouest. C’est
l’une des mesures de la réussite de la Société dans l’atteinte de l’un de ses objectifs:
encourager et promouvoir la recherche en Afrique de l’Ouest par des Africains de l’Ouest.
Plusieurs aspects de ce numéro sont particulièrement bienvenus pour marquer
notre jubilé. Le premier est que dans ce numéro, pour la première fois, tous les
articles longs ont été écrits par des auteurs Ouest Africains. D’autre part, s’agissant du
50ème anniversaire depuis notre création en tant que Nigerian Ornithologists’
Society, il est d’autant plus opportun que deux de ces articles proviennent du Nigeria.
De plus, l’un d’eux examine ce qui a changé dans l’avifaune d’ Ibadan depuis 50 ans,
alors précisément que notre création avait coïncidé avec la publication d’un travail-
clé sur le district par John Elgood, l’un de nos fondateurs, et Frank Sibley. L’autre
article réexamine des aspects de l’avifaune de la Réserve de faune de Yankari, que
des membres de N. O. S. et de la S. O. O. A. avaient étudiés depuis nos débuts. Le
troisième article, d’Afrique de l’Ouest francophone, démontre que notre évolution
vers un journal bilingue, alors que la couverture géographique de la Société s’était
étendue à toute l’Afrique de l’Ouest, conserve toute sa valeur. Et enfin, tout ceci est
une pure coïncidence: pour tous ceux enclins à croire aux présages, voilà peut-être un
ensemble de signes prometteurs quant à l’avenir des oiseaux d’Afrique de l’Ouest.
Le fait que nous continuions à recevoir des contributions du Nigeria est en partie
dû à la stimulation encore exercée par des institutions d’installation ancienne, dont
l’Université et l’Institut International d’Agriculture Tropicale d’Ibadan, ainsi que
l’Institut de Recherche Ornithologique A.P. Leventis. Nous pouvons également considérer
avec satisfaction que la N. O. S. et la S.O.O.A. ont contribué à cette stimulation.
Ainsi, bien que la Société et son journal aient connu des périodes inquiétantes
dans le passé (et encore aujourd’hui, avec des soumissions très peu nombreuses cette
année), nous avons de bonnes raisons d’avoir confiance dans l’avenir de
l’ornithologie au Nigeria et en Afrique de l’Ouest, avec des praticiens produisant de
précieuses nouvelles connaissances et contribuant à la conservation des oiseaux en
Afrique de l’Ouest. À coup sûr, des raisons suffisantes pour célébrer cet anniversaire.
Alan Tye (traduit: Nils Robin)
2014
67
Raptors in Yankari Game Reserve and
surrounding unprotected area, Nigeria
by J.D. Onoja1,2, T. Tende1,3, T.C. Omotoriogun1,4, U. Ottosson1,
S.A. Manu1,2 & G.S. Mwansat2
]A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, PO Box 13404, Jos Plateau State, Nigeria
2Dept of Zoology, University of Jos, PMB 2084, Jos, Nigeria <oj_daniels@yahoo.com>
3Dept of Animal Ecology, Lund University, Sweden
4National Centre for Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, Univ. of Oslo, Norway
Received 15 May 2012; revised 27 February 2014.
Summary
A recent survey to estimate the population of raptors in and around Yankari
Game Reserve revealed that the reserve still holds a number of raptor species
also found in other reserves in West Africa. In total, 886 raptors of 37 species
were recorded in the gallery forest and savanna habitats of the reserve, while
155 individuals in 18 species were encountered outside of the reserve. The
number of raptors per km of transect in the unprotected area was lower than in
the reserve, despite transect speed being slower and raptor detectability
probably higher in the unprotected area. Most of the species encountered
during surveys were medium-sized raptors. Juvenile raptors were seen only
within the reserve, and adults of large species were rare outside it. Vultures
seem to have declined since 2008, with two species having apparently been
lost from the area.
Résumé
Les rapaces dans la Réserve Naturelle de Yankari et la zone adjacente
non protégée, Nigeria. Une étude récente visant à estimer la population de
rapaces dans et autour de la Réserve Naturelle de Yankari a révélé que la
réserve contient encore nombre d’espèces de rapaces également présentes
dans d’autres réserves d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Au total, 886 rapaces de 37
espèces ont été observés dans les habitats de forêt galerie et de savane, tandis
que 155 individus de 14 espèces ont été rencontrés hors de la réserve. Le
nombre de rapaces par km de transect dans la zone non protégée était inférieur
à celui de la réserve, bien que la vitesse de parcours des transects ait été plus
lente et la possibilité de découverte de rapaces probablement plus forte dans la
zone non protégée. La plupart des espèces rencontrées au cours des enquêtes
68
J.D. Onoja eî al
Malimbus 36
ont été des rapaces de taille moyenne. Des rapaces juvéniles n’ont été vus
qu’à l’intérieur de la réserve et les adultes d’espèces de grande taille étaient
rares à l’extérieur. Les vautours paraissent être moins nombreux depuis 2008,
avec deux espèces ayant apparemment disparu de la zone.
Introduction
Diurnal birds of prey are good indicators of changes in ecosystems and of impacts of
human activity, owing to their sensitivity to environmental contamination, persecution
and disturbance (Newton 1979). Most species of raptor are conspicuous and they feed
on a broad array of invertebrates and vertebrates across all natural and artificial
habitats (Thiollay 2006). Today, the dramatic increase in human pressure,
deforestation and general decrease in tree cover, overgrazing and erosion, pesticide
use, over-hunting and fishing, and sometimes direct persecution of predators, all
impact negatively on raptor population (Thiollay 2006). To counter widespread
population declines, many attempts have been made in recent years to increase raptor
numbers, either by the management of the birds themselves or of their habitat and
food sources (Newton 1979). The positive effects on these birds are revealed in nature
reserves, where threats to them are minimized. For example in West Africa an
estimate of the mean abundance index of raptors between protected and unprotected
areas has shown a 30 % decline of raptors in protected areas compared with a 67 %
decline in unprotected areas (Thiollay 2006, 2007b). In the savannas of West Africa,
40 breeding raptor species and 19 Palaearctic migrant species have been recorded
(Borrow & Demey 2001, Thiollay 2007a). Brown (1970) observed that little is known
about the actual numbers of the various species, and without knowing this it is
difficult to determine the real effect of conservation effort.
A recent survey in Yankari Game Reserve, Bauch i State, Nigeria, revealed a
decline in the population of vultures (Tende & Ottosson 2008). However, data on the
population status of other raptor species is lacking. The aim of these surveys was
therefore to estimate the abundance, diversity and distribution of raptors in Yankari
Game Reserve and surrounding unprotected areas, in a bid to establish a baseline for
conservation for this group of birds.
Methods
Study site
The survey was carried out in and around the Yankari Game Reserve (9° SON,
10°30'E), Bauchi State in the east-central part of Nigeria. The reserve has a total area
of 2244 km2 and is bisected by the River Gaji. It lies within the Sudan Savanna Zone
(Geerling 1973) and receives an average rainfall of c. 1000 mm per year, between
2014
Raptors at Yankari
69
April and October (Crick & Marshall 1981). The vegetation includes swampy flood
plain bordered by patches of forest, gallery forest, riparian forest and woodland
savanna (Crick & Marshall 1981, Ezealor 2002). In seasonally flooded “fadamas”,
Ficus spp. and Mitragyna sp. are the dominant trees, while tangles of Mimosa pigra
dominate the shrub stratum. The reserve was established as a Game Preservation Unit
(GPU) of the Northern Region of Nigeria in January 1956 (Sikes 1964), and from its
inception has been traversed by roads, by which border zone communities reach and
utilize renewable natural resources within the reserve. Presently, twelve communities
around the reserve have roads leading to its centre at Wikki Camp (9°45rN, 10°30'E.
About 337 species of birds have been recorded (Ezealor 2002), of which 130 are
resident, 50 are Palaearctic migrants and the rest are intra- African migrants.
The unprotected area outside the reserve is mainly farmland with scattered trees
and hedges of Guerra senegalensis. Crops grown in these farmlands were mostly
groundnut Arachis hypogaea, beans Phaseolus vulgaris, guinea com Sorghum
bicolor , millet Pennisetum glaucum and rice Oryza sativa.
Survey Design
The survey within the reserve was carried out for eight weeks from 21 April to 28
June 2008. This period coincided with the beginning of the rainy season, with
insignificant rainfall during the period of the survey. Twenty line-transects (Bibby et
al 2000) of an average length of 10 km were used to count raptors. A total distance of
1636 km was covered during this transect survey. Transects were along game viewing
and anti-poaching patrol tracks, and chosen to cover both savanna and gallery forest
habitats. The coordinates of the start and end of each transect were recorded. Surveys
were carried out in the morning (6h30-13h00) and evening (15h00-18h00). Counts
were made by two non-driving observers from a car moving at an average speed
between 12 and 25 km/h (Fuller & Mosher 1981). All raptors flying, perched and
heard were identified, counted and their locations recorded using a Garmin 760CSx
global positioning system (GPS) receiver. For birds seen perched, their perpendicular
distances from the transect were recorded using a Canon Laser Range Finder.
In addition, observations were made from five different vantage points with good
views of the surroundings (Fig. 1). Each point was visited at least three times and one
hour was spent at each point, between 12hO0 and 13h00, i.e. at a time of day when
raptors make use of thermals to soar. Using binoculars and a telescope, the
surroundings were scanned for any raptors seen perched or flying. Efforts were made
to avoid double counts of birds observed by noting the direction in which the last
counted individual disappeared from sight and the flock size.
The unprotected area outside the reserve was surveyed between 23 May and
23 July 2009. A total of 33 transects, each measuring 10 km in length, was laid in
the area surrounding the reserve. Counts were made by two non-driving observers
from a car moving at an average speed of 10.5 km/h (slower than in the reserve
because of the bumpy nature of the roads). All raptors seen perched or flying or heard were
70
J.D. Onoja et al.
Malimbus 36
Figure 1. LandSat photograph of Yankari Game Reserve and surrounding
unprotected area, showing observation vantage points.
identified and their location recorded. Surveys were carried out between lOhOO and
14h00, and all transects were visited once. The survey covered a total distance of 330
km. Five vantage points outside the reserve were used for observing raptors soaring or
perched (Fig. 1).
Data Analysis
The surveys were designed to provide baseline data for each of the two areas and not
primarily for comparison between them. Detectability, timing of survey periods and
speed of the vehicle were all different in the two habitats. Detectability was probably
higher in the unprotected area than in the reserve because of the more open nature of
the unprotected area, and transect speed was slower there. This must be borne in mind
when using these data for comparison between the two habitats.
Abundance on transects, of all raptors combined and of each raptor species, is
expressed as encounter rate, in terms of the number of individuals encountered per
100 km of transect travelled and per h of transect time. Encounter rate during vantage
point observations is expressed as number of raptors seen per h of observation. The
encounter rates on transects were calculated as total number of individuals
encountered over the total distance covered per month during the period of survey.
2014
Raptors at Yankari
71
Results
In the reserve, 886 individual raptors of 37 species were recorded during the transects,
combining forest and savanna (Table 1), of which 49 individuals (5.5 %) were classed
as juveniles and sub-adults. In April, 170 raptors were seen over a total distance of
301.1 km covered (56 birds per 100 km), May had 418 raptors over 789.1 km (53 per
100 km), while June had 298 raptors over 545.3 km (55 per 100 km): there was no
significant difference in encounter rate on transects between months (x2 = 0.0854, df =
2, P = 0.958). The overall raptor encounter rates during transects in the reserve were
54 birds per 100 km (total 1635.6 km) or 5.5 birds per h (total 160.35 h), with higher
overall encounter rate in the forest than in the savanna (Table 1). In the savanna, the
Grasshopper Buzzard was the species with the highest encounter rate, with other
common species including Dark Chanting-Goshawk, Grey Kestrel and Bateleur, while
the Palmnut Vulture had the highest encounter rate for the gallery forest with other
commonly encountered species there including Bateleur, African Fish-Eagle, Black
Kite, Lizard Buzzard, Grey Kestrel and African Hawk-Eagle (Table 1). Encounter rates
at vantage point observations in the reserve were higher than the per h results from
transects, but because less time was spent on the former (total 17 h of observation), the
results for each species are less informative and are not presented here; 126 raptors were
counted during vantage point observations in the reserve, giving an overall encounter
rate of 7.4 birds/h. During the ten weeks of fieldwork, the Secretary Bird Sagittarius ser-
pentarius was sighted only once, in the reserve but outside the survey period on 2 1 April.
For the unprotected area, 155 individual raptors, of 18 species, were encountered
during the transect survey. In May, 36 raptors were seen and a total distance of 70 km
was covered (51 birds per 100 km), June had 105 raptors over 170 km (62 per 100
km), while July had 14 raptors over 90 km (16 per 100 km). There was a significant
difference between months in the encounter rates of raptors during the transect survey
(X2 = 26.84, df = 2, P < 0.0001), largely because Grasshopper Buzzard was common
in May and June but not recorded in July. The overall raptor encounter rate during
transects in the unprotected area was 47 birds per 100 km ( c . 330 km) and 4.5 birds
per h (34.5 h of survey). The species with the highest encounter rate was Black Kite,
while Grasshopper Buzzard and Fox Kestrel were also common (Table 1). African
Swallow-tailed Kite, Bateleur, Brown Snake Eagle, Eurasian Marsh Harrier, Lanner
and Lizard Buzzard were encountered only once each, the Eurasian Marsh Harrier in a
rice field on 23 May. During vantage point observations outside the reserve, the
encounter rate was 3.5 birds per h (26 birds over 7.5 h of observation).
Discussion
This survey shows that the Yankari Game Reserve still retains a considerable number
of raptor species that normally occur in other nature reserves in West Africa (cf. Thiollay
72
J.D. Onoja et al.
Malimbus 36
Table 1. Transect counts of raptor species in savanna and gallery forest in the
Yankari Game Reserve,, and in the surrounding unprotected area.
2014
Raptors at Yankari
73
2006). However, only three species of vulture were seen during the survey, in contrast
to the five species recorded by Tende & Ottosson (2008), who also found Lappet-
faced Vulture Torgos tracheliotos and European Griffon Gyps fulvus. The population
of vultures in the reserve has declined markedly as compared with earlier surveys
(Dyer & Gartshore 1975, Crick & Marshall 1981). Similarly, in the Sudan Savanna
zone of West Africa, Thiollay (2006) reported a decline of 97 % of the African White-
backed Vulture in 30 years. Possible reasons for such declines may be poisoning and
persecution, and Thiollay (2007a) suggested that habitat degradation was a major
factor. Protected areas remain a haven for raptors and should be maintained as such.
However, the decline of vulture populations observed in the reserve may be due to
poisoning outside the protected area (Tende & Ottosson 2008).
Other large raptor species such as Martial Eagle, Long-crested Eagle, Tawny
Eagle, African Hawk Eagle and 'Wahl berg’s Eagle were recorded in the reserve,
including juveniles of Bateleur, Palmnut Vulture, African Hawk-eagle and Martial
Eagle, suggesting that it may be an important breeding ground for raptor species.
During both vantage point observations and road transects outside the reserve, only
adult birds were seen. It may be that the species recorded outside the reserve mostly
breed within it and only use the unprotected area for hunting.
The single sighting of Secretary Bird contrasts with the situation in the 1970s,
when Demeter (1977) suggested that the bird occurred regularly in the reserve in low
numbers. However, this species has declined so much that it is not seen in Nigeria
now outside protected areas and only rarely within them.
The species encountered most often outside the reserve were of medium size:
Black Kite, Fox Kestrel, Grasshopper Buzzard (in May-June), Dark Chanting-
Goshawk and Red-necked Buzzard. The Fox Kestrel was mostly found in an area
west of the reserve, probably due to the rocky nature of the habitat there (cf. Brown et
al 1997). Among the larger raptors recorded in the unprotected area were Bateleur
(seen once, soaring) and Long-crested Eagle (seen twice outside and twice soaring
over the protected area). Larger raptors may not find the unprotected areas conducive
because of inadequate food supply and nest sites due to the degraded nature of the
habitat. African Swallow-tailed Kite was recorded once outside the reserve; this
species has never been recorded within the reserve, either during this survey or
previously. The largest raptor encountered regularly in open plains and farmlands was
the Red-necked Buzzard. No vultures were encountered in the unprotected area,
perhaps because of the severe persecution that vultures and other raptors have
suffered (e.g, Rondeau & Thiollay 2004, Thiollay 2006). When seen, vultures were
either soaring very high or within the reserve.
There was little difference in the number of birds recorded between months
probably because most of the species recorded are residents or have resident
populations. In the case of Grasshopper Buzzard, not recorded in July during the
survey outside the reserve, nor within it that month (casual observations), it may have
migrated northwards to breed then (Brown et al 1997).
74
J.D. Onoja et al.
Malimbus 36
The average number of raptors observed in the unprotected area was 0.48
birds/km, lower than in the protected area (0.75), despite the transect speed being
slower and raptor detectability probably higher outside the reserve. It is also lower
than in other studies (1.63, Thiollay 2006; 0.58, Tende & Ottosson 2008). The lower
rate outside the reserve could be partly due to the surveys there having been carried
out later than those in the reserve, so that Palaearctic migrants such as Honey-
Buzzard, harriers and Red-footed Falcon would have departed by the later part of the
unprotected area survey. However, higher encounter rates were found outside the
reserve for the migrant Black Kite and, overall, the proportion of species encountered
that were Palaearctic migrants was small, so that this factor could not account for the
generally lower encounter rate in the unprotected area. Rather, other factors such as
pesticide use on farmlands may have reduced the number of insects and rodents in
unprotected areas, making them less suitable for raptors as compared with protected
areas. Overgrazing and cutting of trees and other vegetation for farming have also
resulted in low quality habitat in the unprotected area, and the area is highly disturbed
by people. In unprotected areas there may also be direct persecution of raptors. People
sometimes kill them for meat or to prevent them from preying on their domestic
chickens (Tende & Ottosson 2008). These reasons may be the cause of the decline of
raptors, especially the large ones, while the medium-sized species that can survive on
small prey like insects, scorpions and rodents are relatively less affected.
Although the reserve’s population of vultures and other raptor species has declined,
it still has the potential to sustain the populations of raptors left, its habitat hetero¬
geneity making it a good haven for many species of raptors. The reserve also has great
potential as an ecotourism destination and a base for biological research. Therefore, it
is recommended that efforts should be made to enlighten the surrounding communities
on the need to stop the persecution of raptors. A raptor monitoring programme also
needs to be put in place to detect changes both within and outside the reserve.
Acknowledgments
This work for the protected area was generously funded by the Leventis Foundation.
The authors are deeply grateful to the British Ornithologists’ Union for providing
additional funds and to the Swedish Ornithological Society for support. We appreciate
Haladu Idi’s support in the field. This is contribution no. 74 from the A.P. Leventis
Ornithological Research Institute, to which we are grateful for logistical support.
References
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A. & Mustoe, S.H. (2000) Bird Census
Techniques. Academic Press, London.
2014
Raptors at Yankari
75
Borrow, N. & Demey, R. (2001) Birds of Western Africa : Christopher Helm,
London.
Brown, L., Urban, E.K. & Newman, K. (1997) The Birds of Africa, vol. 2. Academic
Press, London.
Brown, L. (1970) African Birds of Prey. Collins, London.
Crick, H.Q.P. & Marshall, P.J. (1981). The birds of Yankari Game Reserve,
Nigeria: their abundance and seasonal occurrence. Malimhus 3: 103-1 13.
Demeter, A. A. (1977) Additions to local avifaunas: Yankari. Bull. Niger. Orn. Soc.
13: 81.
Dyer, M. & Gartshore, M.E. (1975) Birds of Yankari Game Reserve, Nigeria. Bull.
Niger. Orn. Soc. 1 1 : 77-84.
Ezealor A.U. (ed.) (2002) Critical Sites for Biodiversity Conservation in Nigeria.
Nigerian Conservation Foundation, Lagos.
Fuller, M.R., & Mosher, J.A. (1981) Methods of detecting and counting raptors: a
review. Stud, avian Biol. 6: 235-246.
Geerling, C. (1973) The Vegetation of Yankari Game Reserve, its Utilization and
Condition. Bulletin 3, Dept of Forestry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Newton, I. (1979) Population Ecology of Raptors. Poyser, Berkhamsted.
Rondeau, G. & Thiollay, J.M. (2004) West African vulture decline. Vulture News
51: 13-33.
Sikes, S.K. (1964) A game survey of Yankari Game Reserve, Northern Nigeria.
Niger. Field 36: 171-180.
Tende, T. & Ottosson, U. (2008) The current status of vultures in Yankari. Vulture
News 59: 7-12.
Thiollay, J.M. (2006) The decline of raptors in West Africa: long-term assessment
and the role of protected areas. Ibis 148: 240-254.
Thiollay, J.M. (2007a) Raptor population decline in West Africa. Ostrich 78: 405^113.
Thiollay, J.M. (2007b) Raptor declines in West Africa: comparisons between
protected, buffer and cultivated areas. Oryx 41 : 1-8.
76
Malimbus 36
Birds of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
campus, a stronghold of avian diversity in the changing
Ibadan area (Nigeria) over the last 50 years
by Taiye A. Adeyanju 1,2,3 , Ulf Ottosson1, Temidayo E. Adeyanju1,
Taiwo C. Omotoriogun1,4, Philip Hall1, Shiiwua A. Manu1, Tunrayo Alabi5,
Gbolagade A. Lameed2 & Deni Down5
!A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute,
Laminga, Jos Plateau State, P.O. Box 1304, Nigeria
department of Wildlife and Ecotourism Management, Univ. of Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence: <taiyelongifolia@yahoo.com>
4National Centre for Biosystematics, Natural History Museum, Univ. of Oslo, Norway
international Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
Received 20 August 2012; revised 14 May 2014.
Summary
Data from a survey carried out between 2009 and 2013 of the bird species in
the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) campus, Ibadan, Nigeria,
are compared with records from the area around Ibadan (including IITA) for
the last 50 years. The IITA campus is an Important Bird Area (IBA) and includes
a secondary dry semi-deciduous forest reserve of c. 360 ha, which is fenced
and protected. The forested area is now being extended and enhanced by
planting indigenous trees on degraded farm plots, and by enrichment planting
in degraded areas of forest. In total, 398 bird species from at least 71 families
are now recorded for the Ibadan area, of which 322 species have been recorded
since 2002. The IBA holds at least 269 of these species (68 %) in 64 families,
while the forest reserve holds c. 137 species. Seventy-five species were mist-
netted in the IBA in our study. Twenty-five species plus 13 vagrants are new
to the IBA and the Ibadan area in general, having not been detected prior to
2002. However, a minimum 68 species plus an additional 62 vagrant species
reported in the Ibadan area by earlier studies have not been detected recently.
We report an additional 29 biome-restricted species present in the Ibadan area
(74 had been reported previously), 17 of which occur in the IBA. Diversity of
some groups of large birds ( e.g . Anatidae) has declined whereas many forest edge
or generalist species {e.g. Double-spurred Francolin Francolinus bicalcaratus)
have increased in abundance and range. Forest specialists, including many
Pycnonotidae and Bucerotidae species, appear to have declined. The IITA
campus, with its forest reserve, lakes and farm plots, is now an “island” IBA
2014
Birds of I IT A
77
of great avifauna! diversity surrounded by a highly modified anthropogenic
landscape unwelcoming for many of the birds that formerly inhabited the area.
Résumé
Les oiseaux du campus de l’Institut International d’ Agriculture Tropicale,
un bastion de la diversité de F a vif au ne dans la région d’Ibadan (Nigeria),
en évolution rapide au cours des 50 dernières années. Les données d’une
étude réalisée entre 2009 et 2013 sur les espèces d’oiseaux dans le campus de
l’Institut International d’Agriculture Tropicale (HAT), Ibadan, Nigeria, sont
comparées avec des observations dans les alentours d’Ibadan (incluant TUAT)
pendant les 50 dernières années. Le campus de F HAT est une Zone Importante
pour la Conservation des Oiseaux (ZICO) et inclut une réserve de forêt
secondaire sèche semLdécidue de c. 360 ha, clôturée et protégée. Cette zone
de forêt est en cours d’extension et d’amélioration par la plantation d’espèces
d’arbres indigènes sur des terrains agricoles dégradés et par des plantations
visant à enrichir des zones dégradées de la forêt. Au total, 398 espèces d’oiseaux
appartenant à au moins 71 familles sont aujourd’hui recensées pour la zone
d’Ibadan, dont 322 espèces ont été observées depuis 2002. La ZICO héberge
au moins 269 de ces espèces (68 %) en 64 familles, cependant que la réserve
forestière en héberge c. 137 espèces. Soixante-quinze espèces ont été
capturées au filet dans la ZICO au cours de notre étude. Vingt-cinq espèces
plus 13 occasionnelles sont nouvelles pour la ZICO et la zone d’Ibadan en général,
n’ayant pas été observées avant 2002. Cependant, au moins 68 espèces plus
62 espèces occasionnelles observées dans la zone d’Ibadan lors d’études
antérieures n’ont pas été observées récemment. Nous mentionnons 29 espèces
restreintes à un seul biome qui sont nouvelles dans la zone d’Ibadan (74 avaient
été précédemment mentionnées), parmi lesquelles 17 sont présentes dans la ZICO.
La diversité de quelques groupes de grands oiseaux (p. ex. Anatidae) a décliné
alors que de nombreuses espèces pén forestières ou généralistes (p.ex. Francolin
à double éperon Francolinus bicalcaraîus ) a augmenté en abondance et zones de
présence. Les espèces forestières, dont de nombreux Pycnonotidae et Bucerotidae,
apparaissent en déclin. Le campus de TUAT, avec sa réserve forestière, des lacs
et des terrains agricoles, est maintenant une “île” ZICO d’une grande diversité
avifaunistique au milieu d’un paysage complètement modifié par l’homme et
devenu inhospitalier pour de nombreux oiseaux autrefois présents dans la zone.
Introduction
The campus of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (HTA) at Ibadan
(7°30N, 3°55TE) occupies c. 1000 ha (Fig. 1), including a 360 ha relict of secondary dry
78
T.A. Adeyanju et al.
Malimbus 36
Figure 1. The HTA campus.
semi-deciduous rainforest, the “forest reserve”. The rest of the campus, apart from the
residential buildings, workshops and offices, consists of lakes, rice paddies, farm
plots, marshes and bushes, which provide additional habitats for wildlife. The forest
area on the campus is now being extended by reforestation and therefore the term
“forest land use” on the map (Fig. 1) includes areas preserved as forest (since 1965)
and areas recently reforested (during the last four years). The bird species at IITA
include aquatic, savanna and forest species, and the campus has been recognised as an
Important Bird Area (IBA: Ezealor 2001, A. Ezealor pers. comm.). This protected
ecosystem on the IITA campus has encouraged visitors, research and collaboration;
nonetheless it has also encouraged poachers, though hunting is prohibited on the site.
However there is no detailed, published and up to date checklist of the avifauna of
either the IITA campus as a whole (the IBA) or the forest reserve.
The Ibadan area was described in detail by Elgood & Sibley (1964). It has since grown
into a large city where demand for fuel wood, timber for furniture and building, farm¬
land and other uses has degraded the natural habitat of the area. Most areas mentioned
by Elgood & Sibley (1964) and others (see Table 1 header) as holding high bird
2014
Birds of IITA
79
diversity are now a shadow of their former selves. However in the midst of this changing
environment, the IITA campus retains a rich diversity of resident and migratory birds.
Ibadan is located in an area divided between derived savanna and forest eco¬
systems. The IITA campus possesses areas of both these ecosystems, in the form of
degraded farmland and secondary forest respectively. Early studies on the avifauna of
the Ibadan area are numerous, though many were carried out prior to the establish¬
ment of the IITA headquarters in 1965, and the consequent protection of the site. One
of the most complete early studies, which covered the general area in which IITA is
now situated, was that on bird species distribution in Ibadan and southwest Nigeria by
Elgood & Sibley (1964). This summarised earlier records for the Ibadan area, defined
as within a 10-mile (16 km) radius of Mapo Hall at the centre of the city, and with an
emphasis on birds found within and adjacent to the extensive grounds of the Univer¬
sity of Ibadan (UI). Elgood & Sibley (1964) reported 266 bird species in total, and
showed that the terrestrial element in the avifauna was evenly balanced between forest
and savanna forms. The IITA and UI are < 7 km apart, separated by villages, though
tracts of semi-natural vegetation are present. Nonetheless, some birds are capable of
flying between the two sites daily as observed for Cattle Egrets and White-faced Whist¬
ling Ducks, which roost at UI and IITA respectively (pers. obs.). Also, the checklist of
the birds of Nigeria (Elgood et al. 1994) gives numerous early records for Ibadan.
Since the establishment of the IITA campus, there have been only a few published
records from within it. The only study specifically on IITA birds was by Ezealor (2001)
for IBA designation (74 spp.). A single record for IITA was given by Ash (1990), 17
records by Elgood et al. (1994), seven more by Demey et al. (2003), and 29 others
from a study of the effects of forest fragmentation on the endangered Ibadan Malimbe
M. ibadanensis (Manu et al. 2005). Among earlier and more recent unpublished records
within IITA are PH5s from casual walks through the area during the last 25 years, and
others listed in the header to Table 1. However, there remained a need for a thorough
survey of the forest reserve and its environs within the IITA campus, to bring up to date
and consolidate our knowledge of the bird species composition of the site. Our study
therefore aims to provide an updated checklist of the avifauna at IITA. We also compare
recent records from the IITA campus with earlier published and unpublished reports
from within it, in order to investigate changes in the avifauna of the campus during
the past 25 years. We also compare these records with earlier and more recent records
from the surrounding Ibadan area, particularly UI, Eleyele, Ibadan Golf Club and
Moor Plantation in order to determine how much of the diversity previously known to
occur in Ibadan is being maintained by the protection of the IITA campus since 1965.
Methods
Each month from 2009 to 2012 counts were made along nine transects, each of 1 km,
of which three were placed along pre-cut walking trails in each of farmland, forest and
80
T.A. Adeyanju et al.
Malimbus 36
along the shore of the lake (forest and lake-shore transects shown on Fig. 2). In
addition, counts were made from vantage points at rice paddies and lakes within IITA.
Visits were made once each month of the year, all in the mornings between 6h00 and
12h00 and evenings between 15h00 and 19h00). On each visit, two or three transects
were surveyed by TAA, walking at an average speed of c. 1 km/h (open habitats) or c.
0.5-0. 7 km/h (forest interior, due to lower detection rates and need to spend more
time on bird calls). Birds seen outside the transect times are also included. General
abundance of species sighted during our study is classed as: Very Abundant (VA)
>100 may be seen or heard in suitable habitat per day; Abundant (A) 1 1-100 may be
seen or heard in suitable habitat per day; Common (C) 1-10 may be seen or heard in
suitable habitat per day; Frequent (F) often seen but not every day; Uncommon (U)
several records per year; Rare (R) one record per several years (resident species);
Vagrant (V) one record per several years (non-residents).
Excluding Vagrants, commoner species which were recorded in the area before
2002 but not seen between 2002 and 2013, including during this study, are regarded
as “lost”, while those not recorded prior to 2002 are termed “gained”, even though
some of them might have been present in the respective period but overlooked.
Vagrants (as defined above) when lost or gained are represented by a V in either
columns, and are not included in the totals of lost or gained. The bracket after the
total lost or total gained gives the number of Vagrants excluded from the totals
(Table 1).
A combination of wader nets (used for water birds) and mist nets (forest birds)
with audio playback was used by TAA, TEA, TCO and GT (TAA was involved in all
netting sessions) to trap birds at points shown on Fig. 2. Nets of varying lengths were
used, ranging between 100 and 250 m and with height varying between 1.5 and 4 m.
Netting sessions took place between 5h30 and 17h00, though sessions were shorter
when the weather was not suitable for netting birds (rain or hot weather) or when the
frequency of bird captures was low. Between five and 14 netting days were carried
out each quarter, with rotation of nets to various habitats. Within each habitat type,
nets were set up in in different sites, and were moved after 2-7 days depending on
trapping success. Net check interval was 20 min., to minimise heat stress and
exhaustion of trapped birds. More netting time was spent in forest because of the
greater probability of missing understorey birds during transect walks.
We collate and compare our 2009-13 transect and mist-netting data with earlier
records, to reveal the trends in bird species composition over time. Taxonomic
treatment follows Borrow & Demey (2001).
Results
The birds recorded at IITA in the present study, and in the Ibadan area by other recent
and earlier studies, are summarized in Table 1.
2014
Birds of HT A
81
Figure 2. Location of transects (thick black lines labelled Dam 1-3 and For 13)
and mist-netting points (ovals) within the IITA campus IB A,
Table 1. Birds of the III A campus 1BA recorded in the present study, plus other recent and earlier records from I IT A
(sources underlined) and from the Ibadan area. Early records: Ban = Bannerman (1930-51); Wil = Willoughby (1949); S =
Serle (1950); ES = Elgood & Sibley (1964); EFD - Elgood et at. (1973); EE/EE = Elgood et at. (1994); JB = Button (1965);
DR = Robinson (1966); W = Wells (1966a, 1966b, 1967); B = Bass (1967); RP = Parker (1967, 1968, 1970); AP = Ashford &
Parker (1968); P - Pettet (1968a, 1968b, 1975); A - Ashford (1968, 1969); NR = Robinson (1970); BB = Broadbent (1972);
82
T,A, Adeyanju et al
m «
t |
ft 2
§1
m
m
§ o s
G, I!
Is*
« g J2
* h
11 A Ü
SI bet
® «
© ©
ft © ©
' >*
.s '■s
È B
Pi m
© .2
WD js
i* u
2 >
.5 5-
— gj
B O
a o
■X H
«
2
"eg f;
B 8
w ft
*C «
« IS
£ +-
*3 §
<u ©
«5
>s II
« A
«
Q ^
ii 2
oiS-i
jj£ 3 3
"O * S
« . N
g © ft
•S V w
Ü
«» «
IS < <
cy
o
« ,
$
© 23
© -a
SJ, C H
ë 11 §
2 ◄ g
Sge
h © ®
V o .5
2 e Æ
a> 5 §
S2 5
3 s 2
g § «
a, n ^
a> 3
2 «
© s
S *8 3
Ü
.2 X
S £ Z
ë ï •§
a 3 »
£ * ®
« g —
SB •
2 « 2
jg « ti
ft .3
— Ii
'O *
P 3
y»
531
3
©
s
© ™
w P H
.a R 11
^ e Hi
© ...
G« .
i, I
^ J i
i-s @9 w
w
ON
©>
41
S!.s
2 - a
u » “
s I 11
1 £ *
B ts «
1 ê I
1 .if
M g S
s 2 u
2 ® 2 gt
«
3 g
H «
8 4§
El
o
T3 f
g 2
ll
« -S*
£ a
V 5®
2 W3
© 2
o g
<«, 2
?
bJ)
3
O
H
3
K
§
i
SB.®
ft Q U
0) ~Ci «
« jft *
-8 y «
© « Æ
ft H ft
el
« 5
2 PQ
PQ
2
S «
o «
O 2 s 8
b a» al
«2 -S .r «
Q -S "R 2
ft ^ ^
S3 »S5
Q
2 8
ft ^
Malimbus 36
X >
/. sturmii Dwarf Bittern PH (1998), ES
Gorsachius leuconotus White-backed Night Heron ES (once)
Nycticorax nycticorax Black-crowned Night Heron F2 BB
Ardeola ralioides Squaceo Heron A ES
Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret A TAA(2009-14)3 ES, B
2014
Birds of HTA
83
X >
> >
> X
pq
Wl m w
Wl
w M
w
m m m m
W W W W
Q C/D GO
c/T « w
w
u
X U U U Ü u
> P4
> u
g fi
a a
Æ 5
K ffi
44 «frj
o 4>
03 <D
S «
toO
W
o
Is
I -s
I &
^ bj
-4^> 'Ti
a 1
& I
® ©
13
§|
Q> p
fcï |
? R
too -ss
d
a
©
x
©
^ &
© £
w §
"S s
2 ^
O a
2 S
« ^
s
CD
M O
m
o
I
I
X
S
1
8 |
$3
X X
a xj
§ a
Si, ©
a .a
Co U
^ £
Æ < M
3 | a
in
A 2 -s
x I g
.a X 41
es | 2
•2 1 g
1 s
o
O K -2
^ x o
*
©
m
©
44
o
©
a *
£> ©
*3 M
© ©
£ S
a ^
§■•§
&5 O
si, -a
§r o
o
'S «
Jl m
'S
R 'S
>8,
&3
"S
&
5>
U O H O, fiq
d a
x 8
X 'EL
it
|i
»V .&o
2 5
f O
||
° g
©
>>
43
Q
e3
©
<U
44
03
«3 GO
s a
2 ’S
43 ©
>
B .2,
o Id
& T3
71
> 600 roost in UI Awba dam environs.
*Three occasions 1993-5.
'Once in 2010, a group of c. 6 birds.
’Favour the small lake area beside the golf course.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
Malimbus 36
84
T.A. Adeyanju et al
> > X> > > > >
wi
_ W|
g
m
<
W
w ..
g
& 2
U
X
Ph
oo
■ On
Pi ON
■N:
m
PQ
C/3
W
C/3
m
m m ^ c/3 m
W W QQ w w
w
< fe
P < fe D
X
Circus macroums Pallid Harrier Ban
C. aeruginosus Eurasian Marsh Harrierj U BB
Micronisus gabar Gabar Goshawk F
Accipiter tachiro African Goshawkf C 5 ES, NR
Æ badius Shikra F ES, B, NR
2014
Birds oflITA
X X
X
> X > >
o
CN
T3
S 'd
To gj
PQ] m
<| PQ
PI
nil
PhI
u
P Hh O Hh Hh T-
<d
o _
fi —
s ffi
Cu
00
a w
u
03 'a
o
u o
co +e
fl O
•3 d
2 t»D
.g -S
T3 Id
CD <U
fc js
« u_,
co s
■8-2
« £
M ON
O ON
O — 1
« fl
« ’g
g? S
P S
g ’-a
O O
co >
<n u
« <u
CO M
^ O
^ ffi
.a S
g -g
2 g
O O
.g j§
o o
-S 1
Ë |
<D
g5 ’O
fl
O
^ s
« o
J-l
O. ^
co
I
Os
. . O
0) fSl 03
1 ^ <
fl « ffl
d O *"H
4=1 — 1 S
50 © -5
g <N £
2 g °S
fl ^ ^
U Æ ”5
>»§ «
O co
d M U
,M ej d
fl -g M
M 'g ‘g
« « a
eu ffl X <= -
85
cn m
Pairs in the IB A on very tall trees (> 40 m).
Forest on the west bank of the main lake.
'Common at forest edges, only frequent in the interior.
‘Mostly farmland but recently also present close to forest.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
86
TA. Adeyanju et ai.
Malimbus 36
X
3 S
Z O
<u
s
P
O"
P
§
m
> X
m
* m
m M
M
o
o
o
Ml ^
Wl oC
«'I
K
P-<
I g
ffl w
U U
o pi
•S S
S I
â m
o
P< ai
ta S
SK g
K O
§0 «fe
^ <
S -S
S go
11
ii
o
13 «
■E 2
U
m
«
1 e
■JB «
"3 'p*
ü g
en «j
*g P*
U C/3
,&a
•2 &
Ji M
« -S
^ e-
a, a.
-2 ta
§
!
£
s
« Q
O O
© .y s
'■3^
a fi o
ai
S «
S 5
•I i
M >-5
g S
^ «
& is
•S «
©
xi M
U
O
s
2 p
"F «t
^ S
l 'E
3
ü
«
*■3
o
&o
a
o
3
&a
S
t
S
Q
S
â
t
s
«
B
3 ^
2014
Birds of IIT A
X >
> >
§ w
.
* &
W On
DO
w
CO
Wl
wl
_ oT
S' w
co Wl
w wl
X
<u
a
sS S ^
TO
m cq
W
O
o
CN
fl
i> t— a
of
d
o
w > U <
P P P
ffl oq O
O O
87
'Juveniles in early rains.
5 A few resident all year and breeding. ES considered it a migrant, present Mar-Jun.
7In mixed flocks of plovers at the UTA main lake.
5 A few present during the dry season every year 1987-95.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
T. stagnatilis Marsh Sandpiper PH (two, Oct 1994) V
T. nebularia Common Greenshank V W
88
T.A. Adeyanju et al
Malimbus 36
> >
X
X
X X
U
U C
u
CN €N CN
< P4 U
p4
s
g, o
g
^ |
O fc>0
EC W
2014
Birds of IITA
89
X X
X
Ph
i%
PQ
m «
pq oo
W
ffl ^ ^
ffl co £ £
«. QJ *
> w M W
?> w w
SI
Si
ü ü D D ^
!D Hh u ^ p
r~ ^
■*L Œ
8 h
2 «
§ ©
H >
fl ps
e
« O
« <3
2 8
*Sd
0? ft.
>>
2
Q
a
<u
SO
<u
X
?
? §p
o ^
8 &
s a
o
o +-
^ O
8 £
U o
e d
|U
o
o
a
m
8
•a «
ft, @S
v. 13
vg> 3
„S w
Û U
e o
2 T3
Pi ÛJ
M i
ta 2
« -g
O
a ft
ï§
& s
O O
b a
| .-§
tM)*Q
sk a
-S §
ft -3
i 58
J y
o 3
■*- 8
2 ^
.3 g
g U
Q |
a
a
o
U
o
o
d4
ü
fl
U
2
2
u
«
a
w
S
+-.a
o cb
.3 C
g §
O
fl
eti
o
E
<
.a
o o
o
3 -S
I 3
I»
II
Ü SÀ
Q M
b fl a
J2 o Q
a il
ü 6 ü
4—
O
O
o
fl
O
o
‘G
”0
£ *
« 4_-
-, *L< cd
a S S*
add
ft o «
g^O ™
s Od -a
S
° g
o u
a ®
g •»«
fa
Güü
M ^
P tfl
2 5 ta
A savanna species, now occasionally sighted in IITA and environs.
’Only near residences.
’Occasional throughout dry season.
?BIack variant “ epomidis ” Frequent.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
90
T.A. Adeyanju et al
Malimbus 36
X X
X
W
XXX
u u
A. apus Common Swift PH (flock of 10), ES
A. coffer White-ramped. Swift PH31
A. affmis Little Swift U ES
Alcedinidae
Halcyon ieucocephala Grey-headed Kingfisher R ES
H. malimbica Blue-breasted Kingfisherf C 2 ES, NR
H. senegalensis Woodland Kingfisher! A 5 ES, NR
H. chelicuti Striped Kingfisher ES
Ceyx lecontei African Dwarf Kingfisher (once) JA, EE
C. pictus African Pygmy Kingfisher R 1 ES, NR
2014
Birds of HT A
91
> >
X X
W W M
WWW
„ HI
sr
SI
U w
U
w
W w
cnj cn en en
Three young collected in Jan 2014.
*Last observed in IITA in 2000, a pair calling throughout the rains,
throughout dry season, restricted to area on west bank of main lake.
‘A pair breeding, Oct 1990.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
92
T.A. Adeyanju et al
Malimbus 36
X
X X
m
czf
W
31
C o
a
o _
« 3
u Ë
« ffi 4-
O 4h *
| | 5
g Q £
5 3 i
S *9
•S *d
S*. 0)
P ed
© ,
*o
g æ
ffi .9
>> .&
H £
O b
-2
<3>
j8
X
X
Si
SI
u u o u
S ffl
g .§ §
2
^
s a r
S G Q
^ R y
a) ’’d
O eS
J â
© >
R ^
& s
« ?s .
u^o
gH o
I 3
? X
"O to
ü Î3
^ g
â g
s*
I ^
CL Î5
O5 S
■s a
Q &a
_e «
53 ■%
IP
f-H T3
‘ «
T3 "S
u c
|cg
e *
i ê
© <L>
S X
<U
x
p
XX X X
X
3
o
0^ 0^ ^
«© <5
^ hJ
g
a
&
a
C
&0 <U
a os
§ 2
|i ®
1 1
Q "O
* a
■a
«
3
* ’3
t> S£
3 ^
s a
GO O
J5,
#
4>
3
'3
bO
>»
«
a
o
K
'd
a>
*5
o
Pm
C/D
^ <L>
gl
sS
2014
Birds of HT A
X > > X
X
X
X X
m
w g
o
O
^ Hi
93
33Recorded by ES as frequent and by PH as a common breeder in the 1990s. Although M found it, seems now to have disappeared
from the campus.
34 A pair parasitizing Naked- faced Barbet nests, Feb 1995.
35 A pair feeding chicks, Aug 1999.
94
T. A. Adeyanju et al
"O
i g
P v
o ig
El
« s
-a f
ë
O
Z
m
"S >»
© »S
fc S
O) on
»?
o S
x
co W
W
0 .y
X X
p4
^ ^ g
< ^ w
fflgw
. W m
oo w
W
o<
« g SI
P „ ^
« pj w
œi « w
£1 Ml
p o o
s "S Ph
bû 41 'O
fl g u
> S M
> ^ bO
^ 4 ©
pj ^
d
fl
o
©
fl
, o
‘Sh 6
s £
o
B £ g
©
Si
|^
S ^
« '2
*3
° J5
§ I
m
o o&
P
•S3 ©
& g
I H
> .a
^ w
”0
«
ta «
&J3
P X
X
P
p
w
S w
m <
PQ
co
W
1
'O
I
J
,© ^
X X X
„y
S
Qj
S l
g» a
>u
I I
s r
es g ©
U U O
X
00 00
W M
W
H
wi 2s
■<l g
CO
W
co W|
W«wl
w Pi PI
<1 <1
o\
o 'st
< p p U <3 P
fl
pD
fl
©
2
O
©
S
P
&a
K
g
S ï
S J
+- ^3
§ s*
i -I
fl
„ù
fl
©
2
O
2
a 'ê
4D g
fl O
© CO
©
fl fl
° §
1
ir s o
o
g ja
Ü o
13 .g
p ^
•a 8
^ s*.
â g
Ï5b 8
X X X X
ü
P
as
33
gt
i
CO â
&o ©
1 >*
&3 S^j
g 5
11
a
&
§ s,
§? a
§• §
J H
«5 ^
Malimbus 36
Chlorocichla simplex Simple Leaflove*f C 1 AE, ES
C. flavicollis Yellow-throated Leaflovef U36 ES
Thescelocichla leucopleura Swamp-palm Bulbul*f C AE, ES
Pyrrhurus scandens Leaflove*f C 1 AE, ES
Phyllastrepkus baumanni Baumann’s Greenbul*f U 10 AE, ES
2014
Birds of II T A
X X
X
XX > >
X
W
IM j
g <
< <
„ r, C/D >
W W W ^
W W
SI SI SI
n h ^
>n N i-
U
< Ph
U
U |Jh
U
95
Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler A, BB X
A. scirpaceus European Reed Warbler EE V
A. baeticatus African Reed Warbler AP5 A, BB, EE X
3t,Savanna species termed common In Ibadan area by ES, now uncommon there; one pair observed in 201 1, in farmbush by main lake.
96
T. A. Adeyanju. et al
Malimbus 36
m
i g
W S
S
S M
y i
E ®
1 «
-S iM
O
-a -s
« 3
i -
£ £
pQ •»
o 5
x XXX X X
X
X
PQ
PQ _
« PQ
< pq
«s
00
W
^ w Wj Kl ^ El
ft HH| <| £1 M MHl
w £1
w
« « " w w
sr «sr
Ql DI
< U < E D üfefefefeE
U
2014
Birds of IÏTA
97
X
X
X
X X
X
X >
X
X
ffl
W| m
•<! w
w
pq m
« w
m
SI
M
Observed on several occasions in mixed parties.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
98
T.A. Adeyanju et al
X
m
m ®
3 3
a
43 g
ed Pm
m os
x
*S § »
I I -S
III
^1
h'a,
X
X
X
X
SI
O D < to 3 P_
o u
12 TJ
1 1
1 13
3 <D
m æ
« d
0) CL)
2 2
O Q
&3 6o
b
b
c/a
a 1
ra •§
-o b
« m
o3 ü
P >
3 s
3 -a
b £
b 3
C/3 g3
T3 b
Ü C/3
S 0)
^ os
.60 "Q
ffl
Q 6
1 ^
O v 3
a
«
0. ^
5, g
F §
•s §
tffUÜ
o as
K P
Q so
Ç? ©
T3 ü
a e
S o
O 60
U a
,g5
5k
Q
o
c/a
•S m
5 ©
S P
^ Q
? R
to
Q) iSf
? H
g -è
O ÊE
* Æ
V, b
.b b
,£> 00
.s a «
^ c/a -g
sa . ed
Sn X 'C
P .S CÔ
© H >
4=>
b
b
* 00
3 3
3 3
b b
b »
“ 3,
-P <z>
« 60
§■ I
X
s =1
§ B ?
UÜÜ
p p
Cl P
S" o
&3 P
Ü U
•§
b
m
S=t
Ü
Pm
Pm
O flj
O a
60 S
a a
^ 2
& «
8 ts
, . o
O N
£
3
3
X
•3
£j
jj
§D
5f
S
0)
60
I
Malimbus 36
X
Lanius senator Woodchat Shrike PH, ES
Corvmella éêfvina Yellow-billed Shrike* F AE, ES, A, EE
Malaconotidae
Malaconotus cmentus Fieiy-breasted Bush-Shrike*t (one group) PH (common)., AE. ES, B, NR
M. multicolor Many-coloured Bush-Shrikef U D ES, NR, EE
2014
Birds of HTA
X X
X
X
X
> X
w
co
W
P4
X
CO
W
P
Ph
W
GO
w
SI
SI
pH Pn
u
Ph Pn
99
39PH recorded it as fairly common on west bank of main lake, though seems much less common now; one juvenile trapped.
40Many records were originally wrongly referred to the savanna species D. adsimilis , whereas the forest records should refer to D. modestus.
Observed Netted Other recent Early Gained Lost
this study this study records records
100
T.A. Adeyanju et al
Malimbus 36
X
X
X
PQ
:lîl Lü] DO
K <\ w
X
m
m m w
W W p|
<\
SI
2014 Birds of IITA
X X
X
qq
QJ ffl 00
m w m W
W pq) <1
<1
g w
a1 ffl
<u
OO C/3
W W
c/3 co pqi
w w wl
ffi
Ph
s
3
ffi
D U D < U fe
U
Emberizidae
Emberiza cabanisi Cabanis" s Bunting ES X
Totals: 71 families, 398 species 233 75 74 361 25(13) 68(62)
(269 in IITA campus IB A; 138 in forest reserve)
102
T.A. Adeyanju et al.
Malimbus 36
Discussion
A total of 398 bird species from at least 71 families is now recorded for the Ibadan
area, of which the IITA campus IBA holds at least 269 species (68 %) from 64
families, of which 75 species have been mist-netted during our study, while the forest
reserve holds at least 138 species, of which 36 species were mist-netted there during
our study. Twenty-five species plus 13 vagrants are new to the IITA campus IBA,
having not been detected on the site prior to 2002. However, 68 species plus an
additional 62 vagrant species reported in the Ibadan area or in IITA by earlier studies
have not been detected on the site recently. In general, the diversity of some groups of
large birds ( e.g . Anatidae) has declined, although many of these were vagrants,
whereas many forest edge or generalist species (e.g. Francolinus bicalcaratus) have
increased in abundance and range. Forest specialists, including many Pycnonotidae
and Bucerotidae, appear to have declined. The use of mist-nets aided the detection of
several species previously unknown from the IITA campus, including Indicator
maculatus, Campethera nivosa, Smithornis mfo lateralis, Andropadus gracilis,
Neocossyphus poensis, Macrosphenus kempi, M. concolor and Cinnyris minullus.
For the IBA, Ezealor (2001) listed 67 species restricted to the Guinea Congo
Rainforest (GCR) biome and seven restricted to the Sudan Guinea Savanna (SGS)
biome, with “restricted” meaning having 70 % or more of their range within a
particular biome (Fishpool & Evans 2001). We report an additional 29 biome-
restricted species of which 27 belong to the GCR (17 of which occur in the forest
reserve) and two to the SGS, bringing the total GCR species in the Ibadan area to 94
(84 in the IBA plus 10 without), although nine (plus five classed as vagrants) of the
biome-restricted species mentioned by Ezealor (2001) as occurring in the IBA have
not been sighted recently (i.e. the GCR species Pteronetta hartlaubii, Gymnobucco
peli, G. calvus, Melichneutes robustus, Dendropicos gabonensis, Coracina azurea,
Ixonotus guttatus, Phyllastrephus icterinus, Criniger ndussumensis, Cisticola
anonymus, Muscicapa tessmanni and Cinnyris superbus, and the SGS species
Musophaga violacea and Hirundo leucosoma). These changes, if genuine losses, have
occurred over little more than a decade. Ten GCR species, observed in Ibadan by
earlier studies but not at the IBA by Ezealor (2001), have not been sighted recently in
Ibadan either, i.e. Francolinus lathami, Columba iriditorques, Prodotiscus insignis,
Erythrocercus mccallii, Megabyas flammulatus, Illadopsis puveli, Turdoides
reinwardtii, Anthreptes rectirostris, Plocepasser superciliosus and Nigrita luteifrons.
Nonetheless, the loss of these species depicts the importance of conserving sites such
as IITA where their forest habitat is being preserved and now extended. Many of the
forest fragments mentioned by Elgood & Sibley (1964) are now a shadow of their
former selves, with some now occupied by plantations of fast-growing exotics such as
Gmelina, Tectona and Eucalyptus species.
The 17 new GCR species now occurring at the IBA are Bubo poensis, Pogoniulus
atroflavus. Indicator maculatus, Campethera nivosa, Smithornis rufolateralis, Andropadus
2014
Birds of HT A
103
gracilis , Cossypha cyanocampter, Neocossyphus poensis , Macrosphenus kempi, M.
concolor, Sylvietta denîi, Fraseria ocreata, Muscicapa olicascens , Cinnyris minullus,
Oriolus brachyrhynchus , Dicrurus atripennis and Nigrita fusconotus The two new
SGS species are Eremomela pusilla and Ptilostomus afer. The apparent arrival of
these species at the site might be attributed to genuine colonisation or to their having
been overlooked in previous surveys. The identification of most of these species was
confirmed by mist netting, with ringing data available for verification.
The Ibadan area still holds many bird species, although some 68 species (plus 62
vagrants) recorded prior to 2002 have not been recorded recently and now appear to
be missing from the area. Reasons may include the fact that some of these are
inconspicuous species of high forest, not usually found outside this habitat. However,
many others are conspicuous and would therefore not be easily overlooked. A few
others may return as vagrants, while a good number are migrants and therefore
recorded seasonally.
The comparison of recent with earlier records reveals significant changes in the
avifauna of the H I A campus and the surrounding Ibadan area. Some of these changes
might not be directly attributed to changes within the campus but rather to the
ongoing destruction of forest patches outside it. The city of Ibadan is expanding and
many of the patches of forest around the reserve have now been replaced by housing,
and natural corridors are thinning out. On the other hand, the extension of the derived
savanna up to the edges of the campus IBA, as a result of farmland degradation and
clearance of forest and bush, has permitted colonization by an increasing number of
birds formerly unknown to the area when it was forested.
Although the IITA campus IBA is protected by a fence from cattle grazers and
loggers, the farming activities of the research institute itself are beginning to encroach
into its forest reserve areas. Reasons given for this include low productivity from old
farm plots, therefore new sites for farm plots are often taken from areas formerly
covered by secondary forest. In support of conservation on the site, reforestation over
the last four years has begun increasing the area covered by forest though it has not been
made clear whether the forest is primarily managed to improve the productivity of
soils for agriculture or to conserve soil and wildlife. A balance between land use and
biological diversity needs to be agreed upon. Further studies are needed to monitor
changes in avifaunal diversity along land use gradients including outside the IITA campus,
and longer-term studies are required to monitor bird populations within the IBA.
Acknowledgments
We thank APLORI for collaboration and logistical support during the field work. We
acknowledge financial and moral support of the Institute of Immunology, Laboratoire
National De Santé, Luxemburg, who provided funding for TAA’s PhD program at the
University of Ibadan. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive
104
T. A. Adeyanju et al.
Malimbus 36
comments, which greatly improved this report. We thank Matt Stevens, Grace
Torkura, Hope Usieta, John Peacock and Ruth Akagu for stimulating companionship
and support during field-work. We appreciate John Peacock’s enthusiasm for our
study, and the hospitality and collaboration of the IITA Management and IITA-
Leventis Forest Project to staff and rangers during the field work. This is contribution
no. 75 from the A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute.
References
Adeyanju T.E & Adeyanju, T.A (2012) Avifauna of University of Ibadan environs
Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp. 27-34 in Babalolo, F.D., Coker, O.M. & Borokini, T.I.
(eds) Proceedings of 3rd Annual Seminar of Nigerian Tropical Biological
Association (NTBA). Nigeria Tropical Biology Association, Ibadan.
Ash, J.S. (1990) Additions to the avifauna of Nigeria, with notes on distributional
changes and breeding. Malimbus 1 1 : 104-116.
Ashford, R.W. (1968) Hirundine records from University of Ibadan campus. Bull
Niger. Orn. Soc. 5: 48.
Ashford, R.W. (1969) Two species new to Ibadan and associated records. Bull.
Niger. Orn. Soc. 6: 30-31.
Ashford, R.W. & Parker, R.W. (1968) Reed warblers at Ibadan: two species new to
the area. Bull. Niger. Orn. Soc. 5: 96.
Bannerman, D.A. (1930-51) The Birds of Tropical West Africa, vols 1-8. Crown
Agents, London.
Bass, H.G.M. (1967) Notes on birds at Ibadan and elsewhere. Bull. Niger. Orn. Soc.
4(13): 31-35.
BORROW, N. & Demey, R. (2010) Field Guide to the Birds of Western Africa.
Christopher Helm, London.
Broadbent, J. A. (1972) Interesting records for the Ibadan area. Bull. Niger. Orn.
Soc. 8: 54-58.
Button, J.A. (1965) Harlequin Quail at Illaro and Ibadan. Bull. Niger. Orn. Soc. 2: 53.
Demey, R. (2006) Recent Reports. Bull. Afr. Bird Club 13: 228.
Demey, R., Dowsett-Lemaire, F. & Dowsett, R.J. (2003) Notable bird observa¬
tions from Nigeria, including the first records of Spot-breasted Ibis Bostrychia
rara and Yellow Longbill Macrosphenus flavicans. Malimbus 25: 85-94.
Elgood, J.H. & Sibley, F.C. (1964) The tropical forest edge avifauna of Ibadan,
Nigeria. Ibis 106: 221-241.
Elgood, J.H., Fry, C.H. & Dowsett, R.J. (1973) African migrants in Nigeria. Ibis:
115:375^109
Elgood, J.H., Heigham, J.B., Moore, A.M., Nason, A.M., Sharland, R.E. &
Skinner, N.J. (1994) The Birds of Nigeria. Checklist 4, 2nd ed., British
Ornithologists’ Union, Tring.
2014
Birds oflITA
105
Ezealor, A.U. (2001) Nigeria. Pp. 661-692 in Fishpool, L.D.C., & Evans, MX
(eds) Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands : priority sites for
conservation. Pisces, Newbury.
Fishpool, L.D.C. & Evans, MI. (eds) (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and
Associated Islands: priority sites for conservation . Pisces, Newbury.
Manu, S., Peach, W. & Cresswell, W. (2005) Notes on the natural history of the
Ibadan Malimbe Malimbus ibadanensis , a threatened Nigerian endemic.
Malimbus 27: 33-39.
Parker, R.H. (1967) Additions to local avifaunas Ibadan. Bull Niger. Om. Soc. 4(15): 16.
Parker, R.H. (1968) Two interesting migrants at Ibadan Bull. Niger. Om. Soc. 5: 96.
Parker, R.H. (1970) Additions to the local avifauna — Ibadan. Bull. Niger. Om. Soc.
7:38.
Pettet, A. (F968a) Miscellaneous bird records for the Ibadan area. Bull. Niger. Om.
Soc. 5: 52.
Pettet, A. (1968b) New records for the Ibadan area. Bull Niger. Orn. Soc. 5:51.
Pettet, A. (1975) Breeding behavior of Clamator glandarius at Ibadan in southern
Nigeria. Bull Niger. Orn. Soc. 1 1 : 34-40.
Robinson, D.M. (1966) Wood Ibis at Ibadan. Bull Niger. Orn. Soc. 3:13.
Robinson, N. (1970) A bird bath in an Ibadan compound: Jericho reservation. Bull
Niger. Orn. Soc. 7: 27-30.
Seule, W. (1950) Notes on the birds of south-western Nigeria. Ibis 92: 84-94.
Thibault, M., Defos du Rau, P. & Welch, S. (2012) First records of Long-legged
Pipit Anthus pallidiventris for Nigeria and Benin. Bull Afr. Bird Club 19: 206-208.
Wells. D.R (1966a) A Striped Crake Porzana marginalis at Ibadan. Bull. Niger.
Orn. Soc . 3: 13.
WELLS, D.R. (1966b) Migrant Scops Owls Otus scops at Ibadan. Bull Niger. Orn.
Soc . 3: 10-11.
Wells, D.R. (1967) Additions to local avifaunas, Ibadan. Bull. Niger. Orn. Soc .
4(13/14): 4L
Willoughby, R.W.H. (1949) Birds of Ibadan Reservoir. Niger. Field 14: 142-145.
106
Malimbus 36
L’avifaune d’un milieu de riziculture et de ses environs dans
la zone humide de Grand-Bassam, sud-est Côte d’ivoire
par Guillaume S.K. Odoukpé, Hilaire K. Yaokokoré-Béibro*,
Michael E. Konan & Pierre K. Kouadio
Université de Cocody- Abidjan, UFR Biosciences,
Laboratoire de Zoologie et Biologie Animale, BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d’ivoire
* Correspondance: <hyaokokore@yahoo.fr>
Reçu 24 décembre 2013; revu 29 juillet 2014
Résumé
Une étude de l’avifaune a été menée de juillet à septembre 2009 dans le
milieu rizicole inondé de la zone humide d’importance internationale de
Grand-Bassam. Au cours de ces trois mois, 121 espèces d’oiseaux de 38
familles ont été observées, y compris 30 espèces nouvelles observées pour ce
site, ce qui porte la liste de l’avifaune de cette zone humide à 186 espèces.
Summary
Birds of a rice-field area in the Grand Bassam wetlands, south-east Ivory
Coast. We undertook a study of the birds in an area of flooded rice cultivation
in the Grand-Bassam Wetland of International Importance from July to
September 2009. Over the three months, 121 bird species from 38 families
were observed, including 30 species new for the site, bringing the avifauna of
the wetland to 186 species.
Introduction
Dans un environnement naturel modifié par l’extension des cultures de riz Oryza spp.,
certaines espèces d’oiseaux qui souffraient d’une forte mortalité naturelle en fin de
saison sèche trouvent maintenant de quoi survivre et se multiplier, causant
d’importants dégâts (Tréca 1985, Manikowski et al. 1991). D’autres sont attirées par
les cultures et s’y installent pour toute la saison. Les diverses méthodes de protection
des cultures ont pour objectif premier de remettre les déprédateurs à leur place.
Encore faut-il déterminer les espèces responsables des dégâts, connaître leur
comportement et les moments où elles causent le plus de pertes, afin que des
aménagements judicieux, l’emploi de bons procédés culturaux et un calendrier
2014
Oiseaux d’un milieu de riziculture
107
cultural basé sur les dates de présence et d’absence des oiseaux déprédateurs, suffisent
à réduire le niveau des dégâts (Tréca 1985, 1989, Manikowski et al. 1991).
La culture du riz est pratiquée de plus en plus en Côte d’ivoire et depuis quelques
années la politique gouvernementale en matière d’autosuffisance alimentaire
encourage sa production. À Grand-Bassam, certaines espèces d’oiseaux qui
fréquentent l’ agro-écosystème de riziculture intensive pourraient provoquer des pertes
sur leur productivité. Cependant, aucune donnée scientifique sur la thématique n’est
disponible aussi bien pour l’avifaune que pour les pertes occasionnées. La base de
toute compréhension de la problématique repose sur la connaissance de la diversité
des oiseaux qui fréquentent les différents habitats de ce milieu. Le but de cette étude
est de connaître la communauté des oiseaux qui fréquentent aussi bien les champs de
riz que les divers autres habitats que renferme ce milieu de riziculture.
Site d’étude et méthodes
La zone humide de Grand-Bassam (5°21rN, 3°46'W) est située dans la partie est du
littoral ivoirien (Fig. 1). Elle couvre une superficie de 40 210 ha (Yaokokoré-Béibro
et al. 2010). Le site d’étude, de coordonnées 5°13TM, 3°42'W et 5°14rN, 3°4LW, est
une bande de terre comprise entre la lagune Ebrié et le fleuve Comoé. Le climat, de
type tropical humide, est caractérisé par deux saisons pluvieuses (avril à mi-juillet et
mi-septembre à novembre) et deux saisons sèches (Brou 1997). La pluviométrie varie
de 2000 à 2200 mm avec une moyenne annuelle de 2100 mm. La température varie de
21 à 33°C, avec une moyenne annuelle de 26,5°C. La moyenne annuelle de l’humidité
relative avoisine 85% (Société d’Exploitation Aérienne et Météorologique: données
non-publiées). Le fleuve Comoé et la lagune Ebrié confluent dans cette zone humide
pour former le plus vaste estuaire du littoral ivoirien. La région appartient au secteur
littoral du grand domaine phytogéographique guinéen et est caractérisée
majoritairement par des prairies (75% de la superficie) et des galeries forestières
marécageuses, qui se présentent sous la forme de longues bandes étroites parallèles au
rivage lagunaire (Guillaumet & Adjanohoun 1971). A coté de ces formations
naturelles, le paysage de Grand-Bassam est aussi caractérisé par les plantations de
Cocotiers Cocos nucifera, de Palmiers à huile Elaeis guineensis et de riz (inondé sans
régulation de l’eau) Oryza glaberrima et O. sativa.
En vue d’identifier un grand nombre d’espèces et de couvrir l’ensemble des
habitats, le site d’étude a été scindé en cinq zones, selon leur accessibilité. Dans
chaque zone, quatre jours d’inventaires ont été effectués mensuellement de juillet à
septembre 2009. Ces inventaires ont eu lieu de 6h30 à llhOO et de 16h00 à 18h00
(Yaokokoré-Béibro 2001). La méthode de points de comptage a permis d’effectuer
des inventaires dans les cinq zones.
Pour la reconnaissance des espèces, Borrow & Demey (2001) et les disques des
chants et cris de Chappuis (2000) ont été utilisés. L’ordre, la nomenclature et le statut
108
GS.K.Odoukpé et al.
Malimbus 36
biogéographique des espèces suivent Borrow & Demey (2001), leurs habitats
préférentiels Yaokokoré-Béibro (2001) et leurs biomes Fishpool & Evans (2001).
5= .Si
LAGUNE EBRIE
GOLF DE GUINEE
★ Zoïiè
(^Siw d'éttadt
Figure 1. Localisation de la zone d’étude indiquant les parcelles rizicoles dans la
zone humide de Grand Bassam.
Résultats
Au total, 121 espèces de 37 familles ont été identifiées au cours de l’étude (Tableau
1). Les non-passeriformes sont représentés par 63 espèces, et les passériformes par 58
espèces. Le statut biogéographique indique que 99 espèces sont typiquement
résidentes. Huit espèces sont typiquement migratrices dont cinq migrateurs
paléarctiques, deux migrateurs intra-africains et un migrateur mixte (Tableau 1).
Quatorze espèces sont à la fois résidentes et migratrices.
Les espèces inféodées aux milieux ouverts sont les plus nombreuses (58 soit 48 %
du peuplement). Elles sont suivies par les espèces forestières généralistes (29 soit 24 %
du peuplement) et les espèces des zones humides (23 soit 19 % du peuplement). Les
espèces sténotypiques de forêt sont les moins nombreuses (11 soit 9 % du peuplement).
2014
Oiseaux d’un milieu de riziculture
109
Quarante-sept espèces (soit 39 % des espèces observées) ont été inventoriées aussi
bien dans les champs de riz que dans les autres habitats. Les autres 74 espèces (61 %)
n’ont pas été inventoriées dans les rizières au cours de l’étude.
Tableau 1. Liste des oiseaux observés dans la zone de riziculture de Grand-
Bassam. f nouvellement observée dans la zone. Statut biogéographique: R = résident;
P = migrateur paléarctique; M = migrateur intra-africain. Habitat principal: E = eaux,
zones humides; O = milieux ouverts; F = forêt secondaire; FF = forêt primaire;
* observée dans les champs de riz; A04 = restreinte au biome des savanes soudano-
guinéenne; A05 = restreinte au biome des forêts guinéo-congolaises.
Statut Habitat
Phalacrocoracidae
110
GS.K.Odoukpé et ai.
Malimbus 36
2014
Oiseaux d’un milieu de riziculture
111
112
GS.K.ûdoukpé et al
Malimbus 36
Quatre espèces méritent des commentaires compte tenu du peu de données dont on
dispose sur elles dans cette région. Un individu de Centropus grillii a été observé le
2014
Oiseaux d’un milieu de riziculture
113
10 août 2009 dans la zone 5. La présence de l’espèce est confirmée par les travaux de
Gueye (2013). Cette espèce se distingue de la forme epomidis de C. senegalensis,
aussi présente et résidente dans la région, par sa coloration noire (tête, parties
inférieures, queue) et ses ailes roussâtres. La forme epomidis , assez commune entre
les individus typiques de C. senegalensis sur le site et bien connu des auteurs, se
caractérise par la tête et la gorge noires et par les ailes et les parties inférieures
marron. Deux individus de Lyhius hidentatus ont été régulièrement observés dans les
zones 1 et 3, de juillet à septembre 2009. Lybius bidentatus est semblable à L. dubius,
mais s’en distingue par l’absence de bande pectorale noire et la présence d’une barre
alaire rouge. Cette espèce a déjà été mentionnée dans le sud-est de la Côte d’ivoire,
dans le parc national des îles Ehotilé (Yaokokoré-Béibro 2010). Un individu de
Chalcomitra senegalensis a été observé le 19 juillet 2009 dans la zone 1. Cette espèce
a également été mentionnée dans cette région par Yaokokoré-Béibro et al. (2010).
Pyrenestes ostrinus a été régulièrement observé dans le site d’étude de juillet à
septembre 2009, avec une abondance avoisinant la cinquantaine d’individus. Les
mâles adultes de P. ostrinus sont semblable à ceux de P. sanguineus, que nous n’avons
pas enregistré sur le site, par la tête, la poitrine, les flancs, le croupion et la queue
rouges ainsi qu’un cercle oculaire blanc; ils sont cependant distincts par le reste de
leur coloration qui est noire pour P. ostrinus et brun terre pour P. sanguineus.
Discussion
La richesse spécifique de la zone prospectée montre que ce milieu de riziculture
renferme une grande diversité d’oiseaux. Les travaux antérieurs (Demey & Fishpool,
1991, N’guessan 2007, Lachenaud et al. 2008, Yaokokoré-Béibro et al. 2010) ont
permis d’inventorier 156 espèces pour la zone humide d’importance internationale de
Grand Bassam. L’étude a permis d’identifier 30 espèces nouvelles pour la zone. La
liste des espèces de la zone humide de Grand-Bassam s’élève ainsi à 186 espèces dont
deux, Sterna balaenarum et Bycanistes cylindricus, sont proches de la menace (NT)
dans la liste rouge de l’UICN (BirdLife International 2004). Toutefois, 45 espèces
mentionnées dans la région d’étude (Yaokokoré et al. 2010), comprenant de
nombreux migrateurs, n’ont pas été observées. Ceci serait lié à la période de l’étude
qui est très courte (de juillet à septembre 2009) et défavorable à l’observation des
migrateurs paléarctiques (seulement huit migrateurs paléarctiques sont présentés dans
cette étude). Vu qu’aucune véritable étude de population de l’avifaune n’a été effectuée
dans la région, il est probable que le statut de certaines espèces d’oiseau, telles que
Egretta alba et Centropus grillii, ne soit pas clairement défini. Certaines autres,
indiquées comme à la fois résidentes et migratrices, pourraient être seulement résidentes
dans la région d’étude, et migratrices dans d’autres parties du pays ( Accipiter badius,
Rostratula benghalensis, Hirundo abyssinica ). Pour d’autres, l’existence d’une
population résidente est prouvée, mais on soupçonne également celle de migrateurs
114
GS.K.Odoukpé et al
Malimbus 36
africains (. Egretta intermedia ), ou paléarctiques (. Ixohrychus minutas, Nycticorax
nycticorax) ou les deux (Ardeola ralloides). Milvus migra ns est un migrateur africain
nicheur dans la région, avec la présence possible de migrateurs paléarctiques.
Trois des espèces typiques qui fréquentent la végétation côtière et les mangroves
(Anabathmis reichenbachü, Ploceus aurantius et P pelzelnî) ont été observées, 27 des
188 espèces restreintes au biome des forêts guinéo-congolaises et deux des 38 espèces
restreintes au biome des savanes soudano-guinéenne (Fishpool & Evans 2001).
Comparé aux autres sites du littoral ivoirien, la liste totale des 186 espèces
d’oiseaux du milieu rizicole de Grand Bassam partage 83 % de son peuplement avec
la forêt classée de M’ganda N’ganda (Kouadio 2006), 72 % avec le parc national des
Iles Ehoti îé (Yaokokoré-Béibro 2010) et 55 % avec le parc national d’Azagny
(Fishpool & Evans 2001, Demey 2006). La zone humide de Sassandra-Dagbégo, plus
au sud-ouest, partage avec le site d’étude 59 % du peuplement (Lachenaud 2006). Ces
chiffres montrent que la zone humide Ramsar de Grand-Bassani est bien
complémentaire des autres sites du littoral ivoirien et vaut d’être protégée.
Cette liste préliminaire du peuplement d’oiseaux dans la zone de riziculture de la
zone humide de Grand Bassam montre que les espèces qui fréquentent les champs
cultivés ne sont pas toutes des déprédatrices du riz. Certaines sont insectivores et
contribuent à la régulation naturelle des insectes ravageurs des cultures. D’autres sont
des prédateurs d’oiseaux, de rongeurs et de reptiles. La lutte ou la protection des
champs contre les oiseaux nécessite donc de connaître les espèces responsables des
pertes et leurs caractéristiques écologiques, biologiques et comportementales. Des
études complémentaires sur deux cycles annuels sont nécessaires pour compléter ces
premières données.
Bibliographie
BirdLife International. (2004) Threatened Birds of the World 2004 . CD-ROM,
BirdLife International, Cambridge.
Borrow, N. & Demey, R. (2001) Birds of Western Africa. Christopher Helm, Londres.
Brou, Y. (1997). Analyse et dynamique de la pluviométrie en milieu forestier
ivoirien. Thèse de Doctorat 3ème cycle. Université de Cocody- Abidjan, Abidjan.
Chappuis, C. (2000) African Bird Sounds. Birds of North , West and Central Africa .
Livrette et 15 CD. Société d’ Etudes Ornithologiques de France, Paris.
Demey R. & Fishpool L.D.C. (1991) Additions and annotations to the avifauna of
Côte d’Ivoire. Malimbus, 12: 61-86.
Demey, R. (2006) Liste des espèces d’oiseaux des parcs nationaux de Côte-d’Ivoire.
Pp. 517-532 in Lauginie, F. (ed.) 2007. Conservation de la Nature et Aires
Protégées en Côte-d’Ivoire. NEI/Hachette et Afrique Nature, Abidjan.
Fishpool, L.D.C. & Evans, MI. (eds) (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and
Associated Islands. BirdLife International, Cambridge.
2014
Oiseaux d’un milieu de riziculture
115
Gueye M.F. (2013) Inventaire Ornithologique d’un Milieu Urbain Côtier de Côte
d’ivoire: cas de la ville de Grand-Bassam. DEA Écologie Tropicale, Université
Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan.
Guillaumet, J.-L. & Adjanohoun, E. (1971) La végétation de la Côte d’ivoire.
Mém. Off. Rech. Sci. Tech. Outre- Mer 50: 157-263.
Kouadio, K. P. (2006) Avifaune de la forêt classée de N’ganda N’ganda à Assinie-
mafia (Côte d’ivoire): inventaire et distribution. DEA Écologie Tropicale,
Université de Cocody- Abidjan, Abidjan.
Lachenaud, O. (2006) Les oiseaux de la région de Sassandra, Côte d’ivoire.
Malimbus 28: 18-34.
Lachenaud, O., Oosterhuis, H.-J., Boedts, B. & Gunningham, J. (2008) Nouvelles
observations ornithologiques en Côte d’ivoire. Malimbus 30: 19-29.
Manikowski* S., Ndiaye, A.B. & TrÉca, B. (1991) Manuel de Protection des
Cultures contre les Dégâts d’Oiseaux. Rapport F AO- Appui à la lutte antiaviaire -
Projet TCP/SEN/0053, FAO, Rome.
N’guessan, A.M. (2007) Avifaune de la Zone Humide d’importance Internationale de
Grand-Bassam (Côte d’ivoire): Inventaire, Structure du Peuplement et Origine
Biogéographique. DEA Écologie Tropicale, Université de Cocody- Abidjan,
Abidjan.
Thiollay, J.M. (1986) Structure comparée du peuplement avien des trois sites de
forêt primaire en Guyane. Terre Vie 41: 59-105.
TrÉca, B. (1985) Les possibilités de lutte contre les oiseaux d’eau pour protéger les
rizières en Afrique de l’Ouest. J. Agric. trad. Bot. appl. 23: 191-213.
TrÉca, B. (1989) Les risques de dégâts d’oiseaux sur les rizières sahéliennes. Pp.
167-175 in Eldin, M. & Milleville, P. (eds), Le Risque en Agriculture.
ORSTOM, Paris.
TrÉca, B. (1992) Waterbirds and rice cultivation in West Africa. Proc. VII Pan- Afr.
Orn. Congr. : 297-301.
YaokokorÉ-BÉIBRO, K.H. (2001) Avifaune des Forêts Classées de l’Est de la Côte
d’ivoire: Données sur l’Ecologie des Espèces et Effet de la Déforestation sur les
Peuplements. Cas des forêts classées de la Béki et de la Bossématié
(Abengourou). Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Cocody- Abidjan, Abidjan.
Yaokokoré-Béibro, K.H. (2010) Oiseaux du Parc National des Iles Ehotilé, sud-est
Côte d’ivoire. Malimbus 32: 89-102.
Yaokokoré-Béibro, K.H., N’guessan, A.M., Odoukpé, K.S.G., Zouzou, E.J.,
N’douba, V. & Kouassi, K.P. (2010) Premières données sur les oiseaux de la zone
humide d’importance internationale de Grand-Bassam (Côte d’ivoire). Int. J. biol.
chem. Sci. 4: 2169-2180.
116
Malimbus 36
Short Notes — Notes Courtes
Records of African Pygmy Goose Nettapus auritus and a Halcyon
kingfisher on Sâo Tomé
On 21 July 2011, one of us (AT) observed a female African Pygmy Goose Nettapus
auritus feeding and resting in a sheltered part of the river Io Grande, Dona Eugénia
area (0.13322°N, 6.61979°E), in southeast Sâo Tomé. The bird was observed for at
least 20 min. (10hl0-10h30) and several photos were taken (Fig. 1). The distinct
plumage of the species and the perfect observational circumstances exclude
misidentification. The African Pygmy Goose is distributed over large parts of sub-
Saharan Africa, where it is largely confined to freshwater lakes, marshes and rivers
(Brown et al. 1982, Borrow & Demey 2001). It is noted as vagrant to the islands of
Sâo Tomé and Principe in the Gulf of Guinea on the IUCN Red List (<http://www.
iucnredlist.org/>, consulted Feb 2014), but to the best of our knowledge no
observations have been formally reported to date. Sâo Tomé is located c. 175 km west
of the coast of Gabon, and the present record thus demonstrates the species’ capability
of dispersal over the sea.
The day before this observation, i.e. 20 July 2011, we encountered yet another
unexpected bird for Sâo Tome: a Halcyon kingfisher. This observation was made
during a walk along the Io Grande, close to its junction with the river Ana Chaves
(0.13738°N, 6.61971°E). The bird perched on a dead branch of a tree located up the
almost vertical bank of the river. Unfortunately, it was raining at the time of the
observation, which, in combination with the long distance ( c . 150 m), rendered
detailed observations impossible. We observed clearly the typical silhouette of a
Halcyon kingfisher, with proportionally very long bill and short tail; the belly and
underparts appeared light and the back and head dark; a light patch was observed on
the right wing of the bird. The Blue-breasted Kingfisher H. malimbica is resident on
the island of Principe, c. 145 km northeast of Sâo Tomé) as a local subspecies H m.
dryas, which is slightly larger than its mainland counterpart. It occurs in a wider range
of habitats on Principe than on the mainland (Christy & Clark 1 998). Our observation
could possibly have been of this subspecies, but we can neither exclude the mainland
subspecies nor other Halcyon species (in particular the Woodland Kingfisher H
senegalensis ). Jones & Tye (2006) considered all previous records of H. m. dryas for
Sâo Tomé as subject to doubt and concluded that there was no good evidence that the
species had truly occurred there; although our observation does not change this situation,
it indicates a need for vigilant attention to large kingfishers seen on Sâo Tomé.
We are grateful to the National Geographic Society for funding (Waitt Grant W172-
1 1) and Martim Melo, Octavio Veiga and Yelli for field work.
2014
Notes Courtes
117
Figure 1. Female African Pygmy Goose in a sheltered part of the river Io Grande,
southeast Sâo Tomé, 21 July 2011 (photo: A. Thomasson).
References
Borrow, N. & Demey, R. (2001) Birds of Western Africa. Christopher Helm,
London.
Brown, L.H., Urban, E.K. & Newman, K. (1982) The Birds of Africa , vol. 1.
Academic Press, London.
Christy, P. & Clarke, W.V. (1998) Guide des Oiseaux de Sâo Tomé et Principe.
ECOFAC, Sâo Tomé.
JONES, P. & Tye, A. (2006) The Birds of Sâo Tomé and Principe with Annobôn,
Islands of the Gulf of Guinea. British Ornithologists’ Union, Oxford.
Received 12 September 2013
Revised 16 February 2014
Bengt Hansson1 & August Thomasson2
'Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
<bengt.hansson@biol.lu.se>
2Sosdala 2094, 28010 Sôsdala, Sweden
Observations ornithologiques au Sénégal et en Gambie
Pendant un voyage d’ornithologues amateurs parrainé par l’Association des
Naturalistes des Yvelines (ANY, France) au Sénégal et en Gambie du 2 au 19 février
2014, les participants ont fait cinq observations particulières.
Ciconia ciconia Cigogne blanche. Nous avons observé environ 1500 Cigognes
blanches dans quatre groupes dans la Réserve de Baobolong (13°34'N, 15°47'W) en
118
Short Notes
Malimbus 36
Gambie, le 16 fév; des regroupements de centaines ou milliers d’individus de cette
espèce ont été signalés pendant les migrations (Géroudet 1994).
Gorsachius leuconotus Bihoreau à dos blanc. Nous avons aussi observé dans la
Réserve de Baobolong (13°28'N, 15°48'W), le 14 fév, un adulte et un juvénile du
Bihoreau à dos blanc (Fig. IA). Bien que cette espèce soit déjà connue de cette
région, il n’existe que peu d’évidence de sa reproduction.
Ardea cinerea Héron cendré. Un individu de la sous-espèce monicae (Héron pâle)
observé en compagnie d’autres Ardeidae, dans les arbres bordant la mare de Leba
(13021TM, 13°22'W), près de Badi à l’extérieur du Parc National du Niokolo-Koba, le
1 1 fév. Les premiers contacts visuels faisaient penser à un Héron cendré leucistique,
mais les détails obtenus grâce au télescope ont permis de bien remarquer les taches
noires le long du cou, comme illustré dans Borrow & Demey (2011). Cette sous-
espèce, considérée par certains comme espèce distincte, ne se trouve normalement
qu’aux alentours du Banc d’Arguin en Mauritanie (Borrow & Demey 2011).
Acrocephalus paludicola Phragmite aquatique. Un individu observé sur la mare de
Leba, le 1 1 fév. Deux caractéristiques rendent crédible l’observation de ce phragmite:
le dessin bien visible de la tête, avec ses trois bandes claires, nettement détachées, et
le milieu dans lequel l’oiseau a été observé, une mare entourée de plantes
marécageuses. Lors de l’observation, le phragmite était perché momentanément sur
un roseau. Jusqu’ici ce migrateur paléarctique n’a été observé que sur la côte à
l’extrême nord du Sénégal (Le Nevé et al. 2013).
Prionops plumatus Bagadais casqué. Un groupe d’une dizaine suivaient de très près
notre groupe lors d’une promenade à pied dans la bananeraie ( 1 3°2 1 TST, 13°21'W) de
Wassadou proche du Parc National du Niokolo-Koba, le 3 fév. Les oiseaux étaient
agités, volant bas et se posant souvent à quelques mètres des participants (Fig. IB)
tout au long d’un parcours de plus d’une centaine de mètres. Typiquement les Bagadais
Figure 1. A: Bihoreau à dos blanc Gorsachius leuconotus (juvénile), 14 fév 2014.
B: Prionops plumatus Bagadais casqué, 3 fév 2014. (Clichés: J. Rose).
2014
Notes Courtes
119
casqués fuient quand ils sont approchés de moins d’une vingtaine de mètres, et les
guides du Parc national nous ont dit qu’ils n’avaient jamais auparavant vu ce
comportement. Peut-être les oiseaux suivaient-ils un chemin habituel.
Nous remercions Lamin Sanyang, conservateur du Parc National de Niumi, qui nous a
accompagnés lors de notre visite en Gambie, et Jean-Louis Faure, membre du Groupe
Ornithologique Normand, pour sa contribution à la validation des observations.
Bibliographie
Borrow, N. & Demey, R. (2011) Birds of Senegal and The Gambia. Christopher
Helm, Londres.
GÉroudet, P. (1994), Grands Échassiers, Gallinacées, Râles d’Europe. Deiachaux et
Niestlé, Lausanne.
Le Nevé, A., Bargain, B., Tegetmeyer, C. & Guyot, G. (2013) Hivernage au
Sénégal d’un Phragmite aquatique Acrocephalus paludicola “isabelle”: longévité
de l’espèce et liens de migration. Malimbus 35: 142-146.
Reçu 31 mai 2014
Revu 1 1 août 2014
Moussa Séga Diop1, Bertrand Mennesson2 & John Rose3
‘Cité SICA de Mbao Villa N° 191, BP 20077 Dakar-Thiaroye, Sénégal;
<msediop@gmail.com>
2Co-coordinateur d’ornithologie, ANY,
Villa de Chèvreloup, 34 route de Versailles, 78150 Rocquencourt, France
31 Bis rue des Châtre-Sacs, 92310 Sèvres, France
The Parelius bird collection from Ivory Coast at the Field Museum of
Natural History, and the first country record of Rufous Cisticola
Cisticola rufus
Museum collections can play a critical role in unravelling a country’s faunistic
history. Each specimen creates a scientific, historical record of where and when a bird
occurred, from which, among other things, we can learn about changes in land cover
and climate, and infer changes in an organism’s distribution over time (e.g. Moritz et
al. 2008). This is especially useful for difficult to identify species.
We report on a collection of birds from Ivory Coast made by D. Parelius between
1964 and 1969, which has been overlooked in previous treatments of the country’s
avifauna (Thiollay 1985, Dowsett 1993, Dowsett et al. 2014). Parelius, the son of
American missionaries, lived in Ivory Coast intermittently during this period. After
being given a book on preparing bird specimens by Jim Gould, another missionary in
120
Short Notes
Malimbus 36
the area, and corresponding with Melvin Traylor, curator of birds at the Field Museum
of Natural History (FMNH: Chicago, U.S.A.), he started collecting birds for the museum
in 1964. The first part of the collection (339 specimens collected in 1964-5), published
by Traylor & Parelius (1967), added 44 species to the country’s known avifauna. In
total, the Parelius collection comprises 1933 specimens of 297 species, predominantly
from the areas around Bouaké, Abidjan and Korhogo. However, while Parelius himself
is acknowledged in the first checklist of birds of Ivory Coast (Brand & Thiol lay
1969), his collection was not examined by those authors (J.-M. Thiollay pers. comm.).
We examined the complete list of Parelius specimens as catalogued and compared
it to the most recent checklist of the birds of Ivory Coast (Dowsett et al 2014). After
accounting for taxonomic discrepancies, we then examined the specimens of the three
species in the catalogue that were not included in Bowsett et ai. (2014): Rufous Cisticola
Cisticola rufus, Black-bellied Seedcracker Pyrenestes ostrinus and Golden breasted
Bunting Emberiza flaviventris. We determined that the bunting specimen was actually
Cabanis’ s Bunting E. cabinisi , a species already known from Ivory Coast. However,
the other two were correctly identified and we include details of those records here.
Cisticola rufus Rufous Cisticola. These specimens represent the only records of the
species for Ivory Coast, heretofore unpublished. Distinguishing Rufous Cisticola from
the sympatric Short- winged Cisticola C. brachypterus is difficult, obscured by variation
in the colour of the upperparts. In addition, based on examination of the Parelius
specimens and others in the Field Museum’s collections, we found the shape of the
Figure 1. Small cisticolas collected in northern Ivory Coast by D. Parelius. The
six on the left are Cisticola rufus , the only specimens of that species from the
country. The five on the right are C. brachypterus .
2014
Notes Courtes
121
Table 1. FMNH accession numbers and data for the specimens of Cisticola rufus
collected by D. Parelius in Ivory Coast. The coordinates are modified from the
original field notes and from Traylor & Pare! ins (1969).
■“Coordinates for Korhogo: 9°27N, 5°39'W
outermost primary, considered diagnostic by Lynes (1930), to be unreliable as an
identification criterion. However, Rufous Cisticola is distinguishable by its more
rufous upperparts, apparent in side-by-side comparisons, and by the lack of any hint
of streaking on the back (Fig, 1). Based on these features, we have identified six
specimens, which Parelius collected from three localities in northern Ivory Coast, as
Rufous Cisticola (Table 1).
Pyrenestes ostrinus Black-bellied Seedcracker. Four specimens of this widespread
estrildid were collected at Port Bouet in March 1967. This taxon is not listed in any
checklist of birds of Ivory Coast (e.g. Thiol lay 1985, Dowsett 1993, Dowsett et al.
2014), perhaps stemming from Brunei & Thiollay’ s (1969) listing only “ Pyrenestes
(ostrinus) sanguineus ”, implying that only Crimson Seedcracker P. sanguineus was
known from the country. This was in spite of an earlier publication by Brunei (1955)
stating that he collected nests of both seedcracker species at Bingerville. Regardless,
there are several recently published records from the southeast of the country: Grand
Bassam (Borrow 2000, Yaokokoré-Béibro et al. 2010), Parc National des Iles Ehotilé
(Yaokokoré-Béibro 2010) and N’Ganda N’Ganda (Kouadio et al 2014), The Parelius
skins may represent the only specimens of this taxon for Ivory Coast.
Not incorporating such distributional data in country checklists can have a
residual effect in the literature. For example, Salewski et al (2001) used the range
descriptions of Thiollay (1985) as a baseline for detecting latitudinal range shifts in
Ivorian birds. However, two of the species listed as potentially having northward
range expansions (Blackcap Babbler Turdoides reinwardtii and Black-necked Weaver
Ploeeus nigricollis) would have been omitted had Thiollay (1985) incorporated the
Parelius collection in his paper. In this case, this is not a serious error: indeed it would
have served to strengthen the conclusion of Salewski et al (2001).
This paper is not an exhaustive review of the Parelius collection. Its data are
freely availably in online museum collection databases (e.g. VertNet, ORNIS). We
encourage researchers interested in bird distributions in the Ivory Coast and West
Africa in general to incorporate this valuable collection into future studies.
122
Short Notes
Malimbus 36
This work was possible thanks to grants from the National Science Foundation for
databasing the FMNH bird collection.
References
Borrow, N. (2000) Recent Reports. Bull. Afr. Bird Club 7: 147.
Brunel, J. (1955) Observations sur les oiseaux de la Basse Côte d’ivoire. Oiseau
Rev.fr. Orn. 25: 1-16.
Brunel, J. & Thiollay, J.-M. (1969) Liste préliminaire des oiseaux de Côte d’ivoire.
Alauda 37: 230-254, 315-337.
Dowsett, R. J. Ivory Coast. In Dowsett, R. J. & Dowsett-Lemaire, F. (1993) A
contribution to the distribution and taxonomy of Afrotropical and Malagasy birds.
Tauraco Res. Rep 5: 43^9.
Dowsett, R J., Atkinson, P.W. & Caddick, J. A. (2014) Checklist of the birds of
Côte d’Ivoire, <www.africanbirdclub.org/countries/checklists/downloads>, consulted
27 March 2014.
Kouadio, K.P., Yaokokoré-Béibro, K.H., Saint Guillaume, K., Odoukpé, E.M.K.,
N’Gnuessan, A.M. & Kouassi, K.P. (2014). Diversité avifaunique de la forêt
classée de N’ganda N’ganda (sud-est de la Côte d’ivoire). Afr. Sci. 10: 181-193.
Lynes, H. (1930) Review of the genus Cisticola. Ibis 6(Suppl): 1-673.
Moritz, C., Patton, J.L., Conroy, C.J., Parra, J.L., White, G.B. & Beissinger, S.R.
(2008) Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in
Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322: 261-264.
Salewski, V., Rainey, H. & Bairlein, F. (2001) Have birds shifted their range limits
southwards in Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa? Bull. Afr. Bird Club 8: 117-120.
Thiollay, J.-M. (1985) The birds of Ivory Coast: status and distribution. Malimbus 1:
1-59.
Traylor, M. & Parelius, D. (1967) A collection of birds from the Ivory Coast.
Fieldiana 51: 91-117.
Yaokokoré-Béibro, H.K. (2010) Oiseaux du Parc National des Iles Ehotilé, sud-est
Côte d’ivoire. Malimbus 32: 89-102.
Yaokokoré-Béibro, H.K., N’Gnuessan, M.A., Odoukpé, G.K., Zouzou, EJ.,
N’douba, V. & Kouassi, P.K. (2010) Premières données sur les oiseaux de la
zone humide d'importance internationale de Grand-Bassam (Côte d’ivoire).
Internat. J. biol. chem. Sci. 4: 2169-2180.
Received 3 May 2014
Revised 4 July 2014
Joshua 1. Engel1,2, Daniel Parelius3 & John M. Bates1
^ield Museum of Natural History, Integrative Research Center,
1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, U.S.A.
Correspondence <jengel2@fieldmuseum.org>
3427 Bakers Branch Road, Louisa, Virginia 23093, U.S.A.
2014
123
News & Comment ----- Nouvelles & Commentaires
Ornithological services of the Niokolo-Koba National Park guides
Niokolo-Koba National Park (NKNP) in southeast Senegal is, with an area of
913,000 ha, the largest nature sanctuary in that country and one of the largest and
most important in West Africa. The exceptional diversity of the fauna and flora of the
Park were recognized in 1981 with its designation by UNESCO as a Biosphere
Reserve and World Heritage site.
NKNP is also a key resource for local sustainable development and environmental
action in the area. With the encouragement of the national and local authorities, the 3 1
eco-guides of the Park have been working tirelessly through their cooperative called
GIE NIOKOLO <http://www.niokolo-safari.com> to improve and promote the Park
and foster development of the region.
The wealth of bird life in and around NKNP is exceptional, estimated at about 345
species from the distribution maps of Borrow & Demey (2011, Birds of Senegal and
The Gambia, Christopher Helm, London), without counting isolated or doubtful
observations. Since 2012 the French association “COMETE International” <http://www.
comete-intemational.org> has been assisting GIE NIOKOLO to improve its tourist
services and to contribute more effectively to the advancement and dissemination of
scientific knowledge. The guides have thus been able to organise visits to the Park and
its surroundings for international groups of amateur ornithologists in 2013 and 2014
(Diop et ah 2014, Malimbus 36: 117-119; <http://www.siteany78.org/>), and plan a
third in Senegal and Gambia in 2015. GIE NIOKOLO also offers birdwatching treks
in areas of interest outside the Park, notably just north of it (near the main entrance)
and in the foothills near the Guinean border to the south. Starting in November 2014,
the GIE will be systematically collecting and posting data from its ornithological
observations on its website, with an emphasis on raptors, water birds and species of
particular interest for ornithological tourism.
To participate in sharing information on the birds of NKNP, or for questions con¬
cerning the ornithological services of GIE NIOKOLO, readers are invited to contact us.
Ibrahima Kouyaté1, Moussa Séga Diop2 & John Rose3
1 Chair of the Ornithology Commission of GIE NIOKOLO,
BP 362, Tambacounda, Sénégal, <info@niok0lo-safari.com>
2Tmstee of COMETE International, Cité SICA de Mbao Villa N° 191,
BP 20077 Dakar-Thiaroye, Sénégal. <msediop@gmailcom>
3 President of COMETE International,
Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. <d@ mete@comete-intemational.org>
124
Malimbus 36
Society Notices — Informations de la Société
W.A.O.S. membership changes
Changements à la liste d’adhérents de la S.O.O.A.
New members — Nouveaux membres
Fox, O., Clock House, Coleshill, Swindon, Wiltshire SN6 7PT, U.K.
Guévorts, B., Rue du Prince de Galles, Akwa, BP 15779 Douala, Cameroon
Mundy, R., 9 Market Lane, Lewes, East Sussex BN7 2DS, U.K.
OsiNUBl, S.T., Swansley Wood Farm, Cambridge Rd., Caxton, Cambridge CB23 3PH,
U.K.
Parelius, D., 427 Bakers Branch Rd, Louisa, VA 23093, U.S.A.
Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
Address changes and corrections — Changements et corrections d’adresse
Cowan, DrP., 3 Bank Manor, Bank Road, Matlock DE4 3NF, U.K.
Fry, Prof. C.H., Bridge End House, Kentmere, Kendal, Cumbria LA8 9JP, U.K.
King, T., Cantuar, High Street, Lyminge, Kent CT18 8EN, U.K.
Kougoum, P.G., Dept of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of
Maroua, PO Box 814, Maroua, Cameroon
Wilkinson, Dr R., 2 Weston Grove, Upton-by-Chester, Chester, Cheshire CH2 1QJ,
U.K.
Wilson Ornithological Society, Museum of Zoology, The University of
Michigan, 1109 Geddes Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, U.S.A.
Tim Dodman, Treasurer and Membership Secretary
West African Ornithological Society
Société d’Ornithologie de l’Ouest Africain
Membership List, 1 February 2014
2
Individual Members
West African Ornithological Society
Société d’Ornithologie de l'Ouest Africain
Membership List, 1 February 2014
Would members please check their entries and notify any mistakes or changes
to the Treasurer and Membership Secretary: Tim Dodman, Hundland, Papa
Westray, Orkney KW17 2BU, U.K. <tim@timdodman.co.uk>.
To facilitate communication with members and reduce costs, members are
invited to advise the Membership Secretary (contact details above) of their email
address. If any member would like to contact another member by email, they
may write to the Membership Secretary and a message will be passed on.
1. Individual Members
(by surname in alphabetical order)
Ashford, A., 64 Main Street, Askham Bryan, York, North Yorks. Y023 3QU, U.K.
Ashford, R.W., DSc, 142 Meols Parade, Meols CH47 6AN, U.K.
Bargain, B., Village de Trunvel, 29720 Treogat, France
Barker, J.C., Avondale, Westboume Rd, Westboume, Sussex PO10 8UL, U.K.
Barlow, C, c/o D. Hook, 1 Waingate, Grimsargh, Preston, Lancs PR2 5RL, U.K.
Beaman, M., Two Jays, Kemple End, Birdy Brow, Stonyhurst, Lancashire BB6 9QY,
U.K.
Beeckoft, R., 2 Fen Cottage, Greeting St Mary, Ipswich IP6 8QE, U.K.
Belman, P.J., 2 School Passage, Southall, London UB1 2DR, U.K.
Bergh, M. van den, Nieuwezijds Voorburgwal 344, 1012 RX Amsterdam, The
Netherlands
Bijlsma, R., Doldersummerweg 1, 7983 LD, Wapse, The Netherlands
Borrow, N., 18 Knights Green, Sheringham, Norfolk NR26 8UQ, U.K.
Bowden, C.G.R., 2 Dutter End, Gamlingay, Sandy, Beds. SGI 9 3EY, U.K.
Branscombe, I., Greens, Toab, Orkney KW17 2QG, U.K.
Brqadbridge, M.H., 23A Westfield Road, Barton-on-Humber, Humberside DN18
5AA, U.K.
Brouwer, J., Wildekamp 32, 6721 JD Bennekom, The Netherlands
Browne, P.W.P., 115 Crichton Street, Ottawa, Ontario KIM 1V8, Canada
Buckingham, D.L., 1 Lion Mews, Bull St., Potton, Beds. SGI 9 2NR, U.K.
Membres Individuels
3
Bun, R,, Wuitekampweg 5, 6741 CM Lunteren, The Netherlands
Chappuis, Dr C., Les Chardonnerets, 10 Vallon du Fer à Cheval, 76530 La Bouille,
France
Cheke, Prof. R.A., Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich at Medway,
Central Avenue, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, ILK.
Citegetse, G., BirdLife International, c/o Conservation Society of Sierra Leone, 4C
Old Railway Line, Tengbeh Town, PO Box 1292, Freetown, Sierra Leone
Collins, ID., Bryher, 10 Row Lane, Seend Cleeve, Melksham SN12 6PR, U.K.
Cook, A.W., 6 Hazel Avenue, Thame, Oxon. 0X9 2AW, U.K.
Cowan, DrP., School Croft, Timmerlue Lane, Newburgh AB41 6BF, U.K.
Davies, M.G., Summerleas, Crapstone Road, Yelverton, Devon PL20 6BT, U.K.
Degauquier, R.. 298 rue Jean Jaurès, 59920 Quiévrechain, France
Demeter, A., Av. Van Beceîaere 13 A, 1170 Brussels, Belgium
Demey, R., Walter Thijsstraat 9, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
Dodman, T.; Hundland, Papa Westray, Orkney KW17 2BU, U.K.
Dowsett, RJ,, Le Pouget, F-30440 Sumène, France
Ecgles, S.D., 8904 Narem Place, Armandale, Virginia 22003, U.S.A.
Elliot, Sir C.C.H., Bt, Ph.D., Blue Bam House, South Leigh, Witney, Oxon 0X29
6XH, U.K,
Elliott, A., Sardenya 476 Ent 30, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
Fanshawe, Dr J., Birdlife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge
CB3 0NA, U.K.
Farnsworth, S.J., Harnmerkop, Frogmill, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5NL, U.K.
Field, G.D., 37 Milton Grove, New Milton, Hampshire BH25 6HB, U.K.
Fishpoql, Dr L.D.C., 12 Mountain Street, Chilham, Canterbury, Kent CT4 8DQ,
U.K.
Fourie, S.R., The Orchard, Benthall Lane, Benthall, Broseley, Shrops. TF12 5RR,
U.K,
Fry, Dr C.H., Bridge End House, Kentmere, Staveley, Cumbria LA8 9JP, U.K.
Fulforb, Dr T,, Medical Research Council, Keneba Field Station, Lower River
Region, The Gambia
Gallner, J.C., St Pierre de Beaujeu, F-04420 La lavie, France
Gardiner, S., Ashfoden House, Rodmell, Lewes BN7 3HE, U.K.
Gaiter, Dr W,, Buchstrasse 20, D-73252, Ober Lenningen, Germany
Germain, Dr M.s 44 rae Cluseret, 92150 Suresnes, France
Graham, A.M., Gull’s Reach, 1 1 Armada Drive, Teignmouth TQ14 9NF, U.K.
Grant, A.C., Inverquharity Castle, Kirriemuir, Angus, Scotland, U.K.
4
Individual Members
Green, A. A., 486 Little Mohawk Road, Shelburne Falls, MA 01370, U.S.A.
Grünewald, Dr I., Stohrerweg 20, D-72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Guitard, J.-J., “Les ZoiZoZen”, Allée Saint-Esprit, 83830 Figanières, France
Gullick, T., India Alta, Villa Nueva de los Infantes, 13220 Ciudad Real, Spain
Cunningham, Dr F.J., 5892 Foxtail Court, Femdale, WA 98248, U.S.A.
Hall, P., OBE [Nigeria], A.G. Leventis Ltd, West Africa House, Hanger Lane,
Ealing, London W5 3QR, U.K.
Handke, C., Stendahlerstr. 13, D-39326 Loitsche, Germany
Harvey, M.S., 23 Birchfield Lane, Milbarton, Norwich NR14 8BZ, U.K.
Heaton, A., 19 Rydal Gardens, Ashby de la Zouche, Leicestershire LE65 1FJ, U.K.
Higgleton, P., 17 Kinlett Close, Highwoods, Colchester C04 4UE, U.K.
Hillyer, A., 2 Evergreen Drive, 8 Milton Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH8 8IP, U.K.
Hjort, Dr C., Hessle, Munkarp 111, SE 24391 Hoor, Sweden
Holler, C., Kammakargatan 12, Stockholm 11140, Sweden
Hopkins, M., TCNN, PO Box 64, Bukuru, Plateau State, Nigeria
Horâk, D., Dept of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague,
Vinicnâ 7, CZ- 12844 Praha 2, Czech Republic
Howe, S., 9 Craigour Avenue, Torphins-by-Banchory, Aberdeen AB31 4JA, U.K.
Hoyo, J. del, Lynx Edicions, Montseny 8, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
Isenmann, P., CEFE/CNRS, 1919 route de Mende, F-34293 Montpellier Cedex 5,
France
Jones, Dr P.J., Balloan House, Lairg, Sutherland, IV27 4DG, U.K.
Jones, Ms R.M., Flat 1,16 Vanbrugh Park, Blackheath, London SE3 7AF, U.K.
Kelly, Rev. M., Sonkwala, PO Box 170, Obudu, Cross River State, Nigeria
King, T., Woodlea House, Stone Drive, Colwall, Malvern, Worcs WR13 6QL, U.K.
Kisasa Kafutshi, R., 11-8540 Boulevard VIAU, St-Léonard, Québec H1R 2T7,
Canada
Klop, E., M.L. Kingstraat 28, 9728 WJ Groningen, The Netherlands
Kougoum, P.G., Dept of Environmental Sciences, Higher Institute of the Sahel,
University of Maroua-Cameroon, PO Box 46, Maroua, Cameroon.
Kreulen, D.A., Multatulilaan 58, 9752 GG Haren, The Netherlands
Kuhn, I.J., Paul Schneiderstrasse 6, D99423, Weimar, Germany
Lachenaud, O., Mellier, 79120 Chenay, France
Laesser, J., Erlenstrasse 17, CH 6020 Emmenbmcke, Switzerland
Laff argue, C., La Tuilerie, 47200 Forques sur Garonne, France
Lang, J.R., 1 Knightwood Court, Rhinefield Rd, Brockenhurst S041 7UR, U.K.
Languy, M., 1 rue de la Bruyère, B-7743 Obigies, Belgium
Leventis, A.P., CBE, 19 Ilchester Place, London W14 8AA, U.K.
Membres Individuels
5
LeedÉn, U., Theodorenstr. 13, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
Manu, Dr S., APLORI [Nigeria], c/o P. Hall OBE, A.G. Leventis Ltd, West Africa
House, Hanger Lane, Ealing, London W5 3QR, U.K.
Manvell, A., 14 Gloucester Road, Norwich NR2 2DX, U.K.
Martins, R., 6 Connaught Road, Norwich NR2 3BP, U.K.
Masterson, A., Cottage 3, B.S. Leon, Box A 80 Avondale, Zimbabwe
Mills, T.R., Cruglas Swyddffynnon, Ystrad Meurig, Ceredigion SY25 6AN, U.K.
Moore, A.M., 1 Uppingham Road, Oakham, Rutland LE 15 6JB, U.K.
Morel, Dr M.-Y., 43 rue Fessait, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Mundy, P., PO Box FM 424, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Nasasagare, R.P., Ecole Normale Supérieure, BP 6983 Bujumbura, Burundi
Nelson, M., 1629 El Prado Dr., Knoxville, TN 37922, U.S.A.
Nesselroade, D., 738 Linmuth Ct, Springfield, OH 45503, U.S.A.
Ottosson, Dr U., 18A Rue de Marner, L-8280 Kehlen, Luxembourg
Park, P.O., 45 Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 1NZ, U.K.
Passavy, G., 25 rue Erard, 75012 Paris, France
Payne, Dr R.B.. 1306 Granger Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, U.S.A.
Phalan, B., Zoology Dept, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, U.K.
Portier, B., Chemin de la Neuville 40, 4821 Andrimont. Belgium
Quantrill, W., Tor House, 36 Newtown, Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire BA15 INF,
U.K.
Rainey, H., 140 Argyle St, Cambridge CB1 3LS, U.K.
Randall, G., 6 Abbeyfields, Abbey Rd, Great Massingham, King’s Lynn, Norfolk
PE32 2 JE, U.K.
Redman, N., 36 Soho Square, London W1D 3QZ, U.K.
Robb, M., 2300 Rue Grenet, Apt #311, St Laurent, Québec H4L 4Y9, Canada
Robin, N., 35 Rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France
Rose, J., 1 bis Rue des Châtre- Sacs, 92310 Sèvres, France
Rumsey, S., Elms Farm, Pett Lane, Icklesham, Winchelsea, E Sussex TN36 4AH, U.K.
Salewski, V., Prinz-Rupprechtstr 24, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
Scholte, P.T., Nieuwe Teentuinen 12c, 1013 LV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Short, Dr L., PMB, Nanyuki, Kenya
Sikkema, M., Eilansgrien 36, 9264 TC Earnewald, The Netherlands
Sineux, L. [Ivory Coast], Joris van der Haagenlaan 9, 6814 LI Arnhem, The
Netherlands
6
Institutional Members
Skilleter, M., 12 Westcliffe Road, Roker, Sunderland, U.K.
Skinner, Dr N.J., 48 Everitt Court, Swonells Walk, Oulton Broad, Lowestoft NR32
3PL, U.K.
Smith, V.W., 1 Karrakatta Road, Goode Beach, Albany, Western Australia 6330,
Australia
Tamungang, A.S., Dept of Animal Biology, University of Dschang, PO Box 146,
Dschang, West Province, Cameroon
Thiol lay. Dr J.-M., 2 me Rivière, F- 10220 Rouilly Sacey, France
Thoma, M., Gesellschaftsstr. 89, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Thompson, Dr H.S., 6 Topham Way. Cambridge, Cambs CB4 3RA, U.K.
Turner, D.A., PO Box 1651, 201 17 Naivasha, Kenya
Tye, Dr A., PO Box 31, Kalo Chorio Oreinis, Nicosia 2616, Cyprus
Voaden, N.J., 18 Fair Hill, Shipham, Winscombe, Somerset BS2 1TH, U.K.
Wacher, Dr T., Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, Regents
Park, London N W 1 4RY, U.K.
Wagner Hodges, Ms V.J., 12 North View, Wimbledon Common, London SW19
4UJ, U.K.
Wall, J.W., 19 Tisdale Road, Scarsdale, New York, NY 10583-5613, U.S.A.
Wallace, J.P., 50 Cherrybum Gardens, Fenham, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 9UO,
U.K.
Walsh, J.F., 80 Arundel Road, Lytham St Annes, Lancs. FY8 1BN, U.K.
Waltert, Dr M., Georg-August-Universitât Gottingen, Dept of Conservation
Biology, Bürgerstrasse 50, 37073 Gottingen, Germany
Wilkinson, Dr R., North of England Zoological Society, Zoological Gardens,
Cheshire CH2 1LH, U.K. <r. wilkinson@chesterzoo.co.uk>
Woqdbridge, K., Twinsness, North Ronaldsay, Orkney KW17 2BE, U.K.
Woodcock, M., Furlongs, Blakeney Long Lane, Wiveton, Norfolk NR25 7DD, U.K.
WÜST, R., Faberstr.4, D-70188 Stuttgart, Germany
2. Institutional Members
(arranged in alphabetical order of continent, then country)
Africa
Cameroon Biodiversity Conservation Society, c/o WCS, B.P. 3055, Messa,
Yaoundé, Cameroon
Bibliothécaire, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Yaoundé, Cameroon
N.C.R.C, PO Box 925, Kasheshie, Accra, Ghana
Membres Institutionels
7
Bibliothécaire, Laboratoire de Zoologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de
Cocody, 22 BP582, Abidjan 22, Ivory Coast
BirdLife Africa, ICIPE Campus, Kasarani Road, POB 3502-00100, Kenya
Librarian, NatureKenya, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658, Nairobi,
Kenya
Librarian, Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
A.P. Leventis Ornithological Institute, Fobel Rd, Laminga, Jos East, LGA Jos,
Nigeria
Bibliothécaire, Direction des Parcs Nationaux du Sénégal, BP 5135, Dakar,
Sénégal
Bibliothécaire, Station D’Ornithologie, I.R.D., BP 1386, Dakar, Sénégal
Bibliothécaire, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Dakar, Dakar, Sénégal
Librarian, Durban Natural History Museum, PO Box 4085, Durban 4000, South
Africa
Margaret Koopman, Niven Library, Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, University of
Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape 7701, South Africa
BirdLife Zimbabwe, PO Box RVI00, Runiville, Harare, Zimbabwe
Librarian, National Museum, PO Box 240, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Europe
Royal Museum of Central Africa, Central Library, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080
Tervuren, Belgium
Zoological Museum Library, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Kobenhavn 0, Denmark
Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle, Bibliothèque des Mammifères et des
Oiseaux, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
Office National de la Chasse, CNER Avifaune Migratrice Station, 85340 LTle
d’Olonne, France
Bibliothécaire, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Fondation Sansouire Le
Sambuc, F- 13200 Arles, France
Institut für Vogelforschung, Vogelwarte Helgoland, 26386 Wilhelmshaven,
Rustereil, Germany
Museum Koenig, The Library, Adenauerallee 160, D-531 13 Bonn, Germany
Universitàtsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg, Zietschriftenabteilung/DFG,
BockenheimerlandstraBe 134-138, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
The Librarian, A&W Ecological Consultants, POB 32, 9269 ZR Feanwâlden, The
Netherlands
The Librarian, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, Bibliotheek
Naturalis, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
The Librarian, Vogelbescherming/BirdLife-The Netherlands, Postbus 925, NL-
3700 AX Zeist, The Netherlands
Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Science, Library, Wilcza St
64, PL-00-679 Warszawa, Poland
8
Institutional Members
The Ring, (Prof L. Tomialojc), Natural History Museum, Siendiewicza 21, 50335
Wroclaw, Poland
BirdLife Slovenia, PP 2990, SI- 1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Lunds Universitet, Biologibiblioteket, Solvegatan 237, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
Library, Swiss Ornithological Institute, 6204 Sempach, Switzerland
African Bird Club, The Secretary, c/o BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court,
Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K.
Agency for the Legal Deposit Libraries, Causewayside Building, 33 Salisbury
Place, Edinburgh EH9 1 SL, U.K.
The Librarian, BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge
CB3 0NA, U.K.
British Library Acquisitions Unit (SR15), Boston Spa, Wetherby LS23 7BQ, U.K.
Librarian, Dept of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford
OX1 3PS, U.K.
Natural History Museum — Acquisitions Section, Library & Archives, Cromwell
Rd, London SW7 5BD, U.K.
Zoological Record (Thomson Reuters), Enterprise House, Innovation Way,
Heslington, York YO 1 0 5N Y, U.K.
North America
Librarian, Royal Ontario Museum, University of Toronto, 100 Queens Park,
Toronto ON, M5S 2C6, Canada
Library Serials Unit/P. Watson, American Museum of Natural History, Central
Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, U.S.A.
Cornell University Library, E-resources & Serials Management, 110 Olin
Library, Ithaca, NY 14853, U.S.A.
Field Museum of Natural History, Library Subs, 1400 Lake Shore Drive, Chicago
IL 60605-2498, U.S.A.
Ernst Mayr Library, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26
Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Ornithology Library, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, PO
Box 208118, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, U.S.A.
Smithsonian Institution Libraries, NHB 25 MRC 154, PO Box 37012, Washington,
DC 20013-7012, U.S.A.
Wilson Ornithological Society, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, U.S.A.
University of Wisconsin, Memorial Library, Acquisition Serials Dept, 728 State
Street, Madison, WI 53706-1418, U.S.A.
Instructions aux Auteurs
Malimbus publie des articles de recherche, des revues de publications et des nouvelles traitant de
F ornithologie ouest-africaine.
Les Articles et les Notes Courtes doivent être des apports originaux; ceux déjà publiés
ailleurs, en partie ou en totalité, seront normalement refusés. Les Notes Courtes sont des articles
de moins de 1500 mots (références comprises) ou de quatre pages imprimées. Autant que possible,
les manuscrits auront été au préalable soumis à au moins un ornithologue ou biologiste pour un
examen minutieux. Les manuscrits seront envoyés pour critique à au moins un lecteur compétent.
Les textes des Nouvelles & Commentaires ne devraient pas dépasser 1000 mots.
Les textes sont acceptés en anglais et en français; la Rédaction pourra aider les auteurs dont
la langue maternelle n’est pas l’une de celles-ci. Nous préférons les envois de manuscrits par
email (en pièce jointe). Consultez le Rédacteur pour plus de détails, par ex. les logiciels compatibles.
Tous les Articles (mais non les Notes Courtes) comporteront un Résumé, n’excédant pas
5% de la longueur totale. Le Résumé mentionnera brièvement les principaux résultats et
conclusions de l’Article et ne sera pas un simple compte rendu de ce qui a été fait. Les résumés
seront publiés à la fois en anglais et en français (ou dans la langue officielle du pays dans lequel
le travail a été réalisé) et seront traduits au mieux par la Rédaction.
La présentation des tableaux, chiffres, unités métriques, références, etc. doit correspondre à
celles des numéros récents. A notez, en particulier: Les noms des auteurs doivent être listés en
faisant précéder le nom de famille par le prénom ou des initiales (ex. John A. Smith); les dates
seront écrites “2 fév 1990” mais les mois seuls pourront être écrits en entier; les heures seront
écrites “6h45”, “17h00”; les coordonnées “7°46T3"N” (pas de zéros en tête) ou en degrés
décimaux jusqu’à cinq décimales (ex. 1.23456°N), mais non en minutes décimales; les nombres
jusqu’à dix seront écrits en toutes lettres, excepté devant une unité de mesure (ex. 6 m); les
nombres à partir de 1 1 seront écrits en chiffres sauf au début d’une phrase. Toutes les références
citées dans l’article, et aucune autre, doivent figurer dans la bibliographie.
Les articles sur l’avifaune doivent comprendre une carte ou un index géographique, incluant
tous les endroits cités. Ils doivent comporter quelques brèves indications sur le climat, la topographie,
la végétation et les circonstances ou événements inhabituels avant ou pendant l’étude (ex. pluies
tardives, etc.). Les listes d’espèces ne doivent contenir que des données importantes: les listes
complètes ne sont justifiées que pour les régions encore non étudiées ou délaissées pendant long¬
temps. Autrement, ne citer que les espèces sur lesquelles l’étude fournit une information nouvelle
sur la répartition, la période de séjour, la reproduction, etc. Pour chaque espèce, indiquer l’extension
de Faire de répartition, une estimation d’abondance (. Malimbus 17: 38) et les données datées sur la
reproduction; indiquer le statut migratoire et la période de séjour seulement tels qu’ils ressortent de
l’étude. Eventuellement, replacer les données dans le contexte en les comparant brièvement avec
une liste régionale de référence. Les longues listes d’espèces peuvent être présentées sous la forme
de tableaux (ex. Malimbus 25: 4-30, 24: 15-22, 23: 1-22, 1: 22-28, or 1: 49-54) ou sous la forme
rédigée des numéros récents. La séquence taxonomique et les noms scientifiques (et de préférence
aussi les noms vernaculaires) doivent suivre Borrow & Bemey (2001, Birds of Western Africa,
Christopher Helm, London, avec des noms rectifiés de Borrow & Demey 2004, Field Guide to the
Birds of Western Africa , Christopher Helm, London), ou The Birds of Africa (Brown et al 1982,
Urban et al. 1986, 1997, Fry et al 1988, Keith et al 1992, Fry & Keith 2000, 2004, Academie
Press, London), à moins de donner les raisons de s’écarter de ces auteurs. Un guide plus complet à
l’intention aux auteurs d’articles sur l’avifaune, comprenant l’échelle d’abondance des espèces
conseillée, a été publié dans Malimbus 17: 35-39 et une version augmentée et actualisée de celle-ci
mise sur le site internet (http://malimbus.free.fr/instmale.htm). La Rédaction se fera un plaisir de
donner des conseils pour les études spécifiques.
Pour le dessin des Figures, et en particulier la taille des caractères, tenir compte des dimensions de
la page de Malimbus. On préfère les figures préparées sur logiciel graphique approprié et sauvegardées
en haute définition. Les fichiers de basse résolution et les impressions de mauvaise qualité seront
refusés. Les auteurs sont encouragés à soumettre des photographies qui illustrent des points
importants de leurs articles. Les photographies doivent être en couleurs et de haute définition. Les
figures et les photographies doivent être envoyées comme fichiers de logiciel graphique (par ex. jpg ou
tif), et non pas être incluses dans un fichier de Word. Consulter le Rédacteur pour tout renseignement.
Un fichier pdf des Articles et des Notes Courtes, et une copie du numéro de publication
seront envoyés gratis à l’auteur ou à Fauteur principal.
MALIMBUS 36(2) September 2014
Contents — Table des Matières
Editorial: Our 50th Anniversary 65-66
Raptors in Yankari Game Reserve and surrounding unprotected
area, Nigeria.
J.D. Onoja, T. Tende, T.C. Omotoriogun, U. Ottosson,
S. A. Manu & G.S. Mwansat 67-75
Birds of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture campus,
a stronghold of avian diversity in the changing Ibadan area (Nigeria)
over the last 50 years.
T. A. Adeyanju, U. Ottosson, T.E. Adeyanju, T.C. Omotoriogun, P. Hall,
S.A. Manu, T. Alabi, G.A. Lameed & D. Bown 76-105
L’avifaune d’un milieu dç riziculture et de ses environs dans la zone
humide de Grand-Bassam, sud-est Côte d’ivoire.
G.S.K. Odoukpé, H.K. Yaokokoré-Béibro, M.E. Konan & P.K. Kouadio 106-115
Short Notes — Notes Courtes
Records of African Pygmy Goose Nettapus auritus and
a Halcyon kingfisher on Sâo Tomé.
B. Hansson & A. Thomasson
Observations ornithologiques au Sénégal et en Gambie
M.S. Diop, B. Mennesson & J. Rose
The Parelius bird collection from Ivory Coast at the
Field Museum of Natural History, and the first
country record of Rufous Cisticola Cisticola rufus.
J.I. Engel, D. Parelius & J.M. Bates
News
116- 117
117- 119
119-122
123
Society Notices — Informations de la Société
124