soc
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Ernst Mayr Library
of thè Museum of
Comparative Zoology
,3
SS5e®^
UN'V
Soc
MEMORIE
■gTT K vac2
.. y^RP^ della Società Italiana
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo I
_ 5
della Società Italiana
di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico
di Storia Naturale di Milano
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN
DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA:
REVIEW OF THE TYPES
FROM OLD DESCRIPTIONS
MILANO MAGGIO 2006
Elenco delle Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume I
I - CORNALIA E., 1865 - Descrizione di una nuova specie dei genere
Felis: Felis jacobìta (Com.). 9 pp., 1 tav.
II - MAGNI-GRIFFI F„ 1865 - Di una specie d 'Hippoìais nuova per l’Ita-
lia. 6 pp., I tav.
Ili - GASTALDI B., 1 865 - Sulla riescavazione dei bacini lacustri per opera
degli antichi ghiacciai. 30 pp., 2 figg-, 2 tavv.
IV - SEGUENZA G., 1865 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina. 88 pp., 8 tavv.
V - GIBELLI G., 1865 - Sugli organi riproduttori del genere Verrucaria,
16 pp., 1 tav.
VI - BEGGIATO F. S., 1865 - Antracoterio di Zovencedo e di Monteviale
nel Vicentino, 10 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1865 - Di alcuni resti umani e degli oggetti di umana
industria dei tempi preistorici raccolti in Toscana. 32 pp., 4 tavv.
VIII - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1866 - Come sia fatto l’organo che fa
lume nella lucciola volante dell’Italia centrale (Luciola italica) e come
le fibre muscolari in questo ed altri Insetti ed Artropodi. 28 pp., 2 tavv.
IX - MAGGI L„ 1865 - Intorno al genere Aeolosoma. 18 pp., 2 taw.
X - CORNALIA E., 1 865 - Sopra i caratteri microscopici offerti dalle Cantari¬
di e da altri Coleotteri facili a confondersi con esse. 40 pp., 4 tavv.
Volume II
I - ISSEL A„ 1 866 - Dei Molluschi raccolti nella provincia di Pisa, 38 pp.
II - GENTILLI A., 1 866 - Quelques considérations sur l’origine des bassins
lacustres, àpropos des sondages du Lac de Come. 12 pp., 8 taw.
Ili - MOLON F., 1867 - Sulla flora terziaria delle Prealpi venete. 140 pp.
IV - D'ACHIARDI A., 1866 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummulitico
delle Alpi venete. 54 pp., 5 taw.
V - COCCHI I., 1866 - Sulla geologia dell’alta Valle di Magra. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VI - SEGUENZA G., 1866 - Sulle importanti relazioni paleontologiche di
talune rocce cretacee della Calabria con alcuni terreni di Sicilia e del¬
l’Africa settentrionale. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1866 - L’uomo fossile nell’Italia centrale. 82 pp., 21 figg.,
4 tavv.
VIII - GARO VAGLIO S., 1866 - Manzonia cantiana, novum Lichenum
Angiocarporum genus propositum atque descriptum. 8 pp., 1 tav.
IX - SEGUENZA G., 1867 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina (Pteropodi ed Eteropodi). 22 pp., 1 tav.
X - DURER B., 1867 - Osservazioni meteorologiche fatte alla Villa Carlot¬
ta sul lago di Como, ecc. 48 pp. 11 taw.
Volume III
I - EMERY C., 1873 - Studii anatomici sulla Vipera Redii. 16 pp., 1 tav.
II - GAROVAGLIO S., 1867 - Thelopsis, Belonia, Weitenwebera et Limbo-
ria, quatuor Lichenum Angiocarporum genera recognita iconibusque
illustrata. 12 pp., 2 taw.
Ili - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1 867 - Studii sulle Cocciniglie. 88 pp., 7 taw.
IV - CLAPARÈDE E. R. e PANCERI P„ 1867 - Nota sopra un Alciopide
parassito della Cydippe densa Forsk. 8 pp. 1 taw.
V - GAROVAGLIO S., 1871 - De Pertusariis Europae mediae commenta¬
no. 40 pp., 4 taw.
Volume IV
I - D’ACHIARDI A., 1868 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummulitico del-
l’Alpi venete. Parte 1 1. 32 pp. 8 tavv.
II - GAROVAGLIO S., 1868 - Octona Lichenum genera ve 1 adhuc con¬
troversa, ve I sedis prorsus incertae in systemate, novis descriptionibus
iconibusque accuratissimis illustrata. 18 pp., 2 tavv.
III - MARINONI C., 1868 - Le abitazioni lacustri e gli avanzi di umana
industria in Lombardia. 66 pp., 5 figg., 7 taw.
IV - (Non pubblicato).
V - MARINONI C., 1871 - Nuovi avanzi preistorici in Lombardia. 28 pp.,
3 figg., 2 tavv.
NUOVA SERIE
Volume V
I - MARTORELLI G., 1895 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. 216 pp., 46 figg., 4 taw.
Volume VI
I - DE ALESSANDRI G., 1897 - La pietra da cantoni di Rosignano e di
Vignale. Studi stratigrafici e paleontologici. 104 pp., 2 taw, 1 carta.
II - MARTORELLI G.. 1898 - Le forme e le simmetrie delle macchie nel
piumaggio. Memoria ornitologica. 112 pp., 63 figg., 1 tavv.
Ili - PAVESI P„ 1901- L’abbate Spallanzani a Pavia. 68 pp., 14 figg., 1 tav.
Volume VII
1 - DL-. ALESSANDRI G.. 1910 - Studi sui pesci triasici della Lombardia.
164 pp., 9 lavv.
Volume Vili
I - RI: POSSI E., 1915 - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrografici e
geologici. Parte \.pp. 1-46. 5 figg., 3 tavv.
Il - REPOSSI E., 1916 (1917) - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrogra¬
fici e geologici. Parte IL pp. 47-186. 5 figg. 9 taw.
Ili - AIRAGHI C., 1917 - Sui molari d’elefante delle alluvioni lombarde,
con osservazioni sulla filogenia e scomparsa di alcuni Proboscidati.pp.
187-242, 4 figg., 3 taw.
Volume IX
I - BEZZI M„ 1918 - Studi sulla ditterofauna nivale delle Alpi italiane./?/?.
1-164, 7 figg. 2 tavv.
II - SERA G. L., 1920 - Sui rapporti della conformazione della base del cra¬
nio colle forme craniensi e colle strutture della faccia nelle razze uma¬
ne. (Saggio di una nuova dottrina craniologica con particolare riguardo
dei principali cranii fossili)./?/?. 165-262, 7 figg., 2 taw.
Ili - DE BEAUX O. e FESTA E., 1927 - La ricomparsa del Cinghiale nel¬
l’Italia settentrionale-occidentale, pp. 263-320, 13 figg., 7 tavv.
Volume X
I - DESIO A., 1929 - Studi geologici sulla regione dell’Albenza (Prealpi
Bergamasche)./?/?. 1-156, 27 figg., 1 tav., 1 carta.
II - SCORTECCI G., 1937 - Gli organi di senso della pelle degli Agamidi.
pp. 157-208, 39 figg. 2 taw.
Ili - SCORTECCI G., 1941-1 recettori degli Agamidi./?/?. 209-326, 80 figg.
Volume XI
I - GUIGLIA D., 1944 - Gli Sfecidi italiani del Museo di Milano (Hymen.).
pp. 1-44, 4 figg., 5 tavv.
II-III - GIACOMINI V. e PIGNATTI S., 1955 - Flora e Vegetazione dell’Al¬
ta Valle del Braulio. Con speciale riferimento ai pascoli di altitudine.
pp. 45-238, 31 figg., 1 carta.
Volume XII
I - VIALLI V., 1956 - Sul rinoceronte e l’elefante dei livelli superiori della
serie lacustre di Leffe (Bergamo)./?/?. 1-70, 4 figg. 6 tavv.
I - VENZO S., 1957 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte I: Tratto occidentale Gardone-Desenzano. pp. 71-140, 14
figg.. 6 tavv., 1 carta.
Ili - VIALLI V., 1959 - Ammoniti sinemuriane del Monte Albenza (Berga¬
mo), p/?. 141-188, 2 figg., 5 tavv.
Volume XIII
I - VENZO S., 1961- Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte II. Tratto orientale Garda-Adige e anfiteatro atesino di
Rivoli veronese, pp. 1-64, 25 figg.. 9 taw., 1 carta.
II - PINNA G., 1963 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Mercaticeras, Pseudomercaticeras e Bro-
dieìa. pp. 65-98, 2 figg., 4 tavv.
Ili - ZANZUCCHI G„ 1963 - Le Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano)
di Entratico in Val Cavallina (Bergamasco orientale), pp. 99-146, 2
figg., 8 tavv.
Volume XIV
I - VENZO S., 1965 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico
frontale del Garda dal Chiese all’Adige, pp. 1-82, 11 figg., 4 taw., 1
carta.
II - PINNA G., 1966 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglia Dactylioceratidae. pp. 83-136, 4 tavv.
III - DI ENI I., MASSARI F. e MONTANARI L„ 1966 - Il Paleogene dei
dintorni di Orosei (Sardegna), pp. 13-184, 5 figg., 8 tavv.
Volume XV
I - CARETTO P. G., 1 966 - Nuova classificazione di alcuni Briozoi plioce¬
nici, precedentemente determinati quali Idrozoi del genere Hydractinia
Van Beneden. pp. 1-88, 27 figg. 9 tavv.
II - D1ENI 1. e MASSARI F., 1966 - Il Neogene e il Quaternario dei dintorni
di Orosei (Sardegna), pp. 89-142, 8 figg., 7 tavv.
Ili - BARBIERI F„ IACCARINO S., BARBIERI F. & PETRUCCI F„ 1967
- Il Pliocene del Subappennino Piacentino-Parmense-Reggiano. pp.
143-188, 20 figg., 3 tavv.
Volume XVI
I - CARETTO P. G., 1967 - Studio morfologico con l’ausilio del metodo
statistico e nuova classificazione dei Gasteropodi pliocenici attribuibili
al Murex brandaris Linneo, pp. 1-60, 1 fig., 7 tabb., 10 taw.
II - SACCHI VIALLI G. e CANTALUPPI G., 1967 - 1 nuovi fossili di Goz¬
zano (Prealpi piemontesi), pp. 61-128, 30 figg., 8 taw.
Ili - PIGORIN1 B„ 1967 - Aspetti sedimentologici del Mare Adriatico, pp.
129-200, 13 figg., 4 tabb. 7 taw.
Volume XVII
I - PINNA G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglie Lytoceratidae, Nannolytoceratidae,
Hammatoceratidae (excl. Phymatoceratinae) Hildoceratidae (excl.
Hildoceratinae e Bouleiceratinae). pp. 1-70, 2 tavv. n.t., 6 figg-, 6 taw.
II - VENZO S. & PELOSIO G., 1968 - Nuova fauna a Ammonoidi del-
l’Anisico superiore di Lenna in Val Brembana (Bergamo), pp. 71-142,
5 figg., 11 taw.
Alessandro Garassino & Giinter Schweigert
MCZ
RARY
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, Sezione di Paleontologia
Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde, Stuttgart
JUN - 5 2006
ARD
' RSlTl
The Upper Jurassic Solnhofen decapod crustacean fauna:
review of thè types from old descriptions
Part I. Infraorders Astacidea, Thalassinidea, and Palinura
LIBRARY
jUN - 5 2006
nV.WERSnV
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo I
Maggio 2006
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
INDEX
Age and setting of localities . Pag. 5
Previous work and present state of thè
art . Pag. 6
Material . Pag. 6
Systematic Palaeontology . Pag. 6
Genus Eryma v. Meyer, 1840 . Pag. 6
Genus Palaeastacus Bell, 1850 . Pag. 9
Genus Pustulina Quenstedt, 1857 . Pag. 1 1
Genus Pseudastacus Oppel, 1861 . Pag. 1 2
Genus Stenochìrus Oppel, 1861 . Pag. 14
Genus Glyphea v. Meyer, 1835 . Pag. 15
Genus Squamosoglyphea Beurlen, 1930 . Pag. 17
Genus Mecochirus Germar, 1 827 . Pag. 1 8
Genus Etallonia Oppel, 1861 . Pag. 21
Genus Maglia Miinster, 1839 . Pag. 22
Genus Orhomalus Etallon, 1861 . Pag. 24
Genus Cycleryon Glaessner, 1 965 . Pag. 24
Genus Eryon Desmarest, 1 822 . Pag. 29
Genus Rosenfeldia Garassino, Teruzzi &
Dalla Vecchia, 1996 . Pag. 30
Genus Knebelia Van Straelen, 1 922 . Pag. 3 1
Genus Palaeopentacheles v. Knebel, 1 907 . Pag. 3 1
Genus Palinurina Miinster, 1839 . Pag. 32
Genus Cancrinos Miinster, 1839 . Pag. 34
Acknowledgements . Pag. 40
References . Pag. 41
© 2006 Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Corso Venezia ,55 - 20121 Milano
In copertina: Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822). Reconstruction F. Fogliazza.
Registrato al Tribunale di Milano al n. 6694
Direttore responsabile: Anna Alessandrello
Responsabile di redazione: Stefania Nosotti
Grafica editoriale: Michela Mura
Stampa: Litografia Solari, Peschiera Borromeo - Maggio 2006
ISSN 0376-2726
Alessandro Garassino & Gunter Schweigert
The Upper Jurassic Solnhofen decapod crustacean fauna:
review of thè types from old descriptions
Part I. Infraorders Astacidea, Thalassinidea, and Palinura
To Giorgio Teruzzi
"Le seul et le vrai moyen d’avancer la Science est de travailler à la
description et à l ’histoire des dijferentes choses qui en font l ’objet.
Buffon.
(Discours de la manière d ’étudier et de trai ter l ’Histoire Naturelle)
Abstract - The decapod crustacean fauna from Solnhofen and Eichstàtt has not been reviewed since thè studies by Schlotheim
(1820, 1822), Germar (1827), v. Meyer (1836), Munster (1839), Oppel (1861, 1862), Woodward (1866), and v. Knebel (1907). Since
many species were described by few or poorly preserved specimens, a review of thè originai sample, today housed in various German
museum’s collections, was necessary in order to establish their trae systematic validity.
This review is divided into two parts: infraorders Astacidea Latreille, 1803, Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831, and Palinura Latreille,
1803, in thè first and superfamily Penaeoidea Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1815, plus infraorder Caridea Dana, 1852, in thè second (Sch¬
weigert & Garassino, in press).
The originai sample of thè infraorder Astacidea Latreille, 1803, consisting of 60 specimens (originally 515), was enriched with
specimens discovered in new quarries and housed in private collections to expand morphological descriptions. This review docu-
mented thè systematic validity of thè following species: Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822), E. veltheimii (Munster, 1839), Pa-
laeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822), Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822) (family Erymidae Van Straelen, 1924); Pseudastacus
pustulosus (Munster, 1839) (family Protastacidae Albrecht, 1983); Stenochirus angustus (Munster, 1839), and S. mayeri Oppel, 1862
(family Stenochiridae Beurlen, 1930); Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822), G. tenuis Oppel, 1861, G. verrucosa Munster,
1839, and Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Munster, 1839) (family Glypheidae Winckler, 1883); Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim,
1822) (family Mecochiridae Van Straelen, 1924). At thè same time, thè comparative study among thè species belonging to same genera
resulted in thè following synonymies: Eryma leptodactylina (Germar, 1 827) = E. modestiforme , and Mecochirus bajeri Germar, 1 827 =
M. longimanatus. Moreover, we recognized that Pseudastacus muensteri Oppel, 1862, must be considered thè female of P. pustulosus,
and Mecochirus brevimanus (Munster, 1839) must be considered thè female of M. longimanatus. The generic position of Glyphea
verrucosa Munster, 1839, is stili unclear.
The originai sample of thè infraorder Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831, consists of 9 specimens (originally 1 9). This review documented
thè systematic validity of thè following species: Etallonia longimana (Munster, 1839), Maglia latimana Munster, 1839 (family Axiidae
Huxley, 1879); Orhomalus deformis (Oppel, 1862) (indeterminate family). At thè same time, thè comparative study among thè species
belonging to thè same genera resulted in thè following synonymy: Maglia robusta Oppel, 1862 = M. desmarestii (Munster, 1839).
The originai sample of thè infraorder Palinura Latreille, 1 803, consisting of 44 specimens (originally 446), was enriched with speci¬
mens discovered in new quarries and housed in private collections to expand morphological descriptions. This review documented thè
systematic validity of thè following species: Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822), C. orbiculatus (Munster, 1839), C. elongatus
(Munster, 1 839), Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1 822), and Knebelia bilobata (Munster, 1 839) (family Eryonidae De Haan, 1841); Pa-
laeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839) (family Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874); Palinurina longipes (Munster, 1839), and P.
tenera Oppel, 1862 (family Palinuridae Latreille, 1802); Cancrinos claviger Munster, 1839 (family Cancrinidae Beurlen, 1930). At thè
same time, thè comparative study among thè species belonging to same genera resulted in thè following synonymies: Cycleryon armatus
(v. Knebel, 1 907) = C. orbiculatus (Munster, 1839), Knebelia schuberti (v. Meyer, 1836) = C. propinquus, Palinurina pygmea Miinster,
1 839 = P. longipes, Cancrinos latipes Miinster, 1 839 = C. claviger. Moreover, Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1 827) is thè female of C.
propinquus thanks to thè recent review by Schweigert (2001a), Cycleryon subrotundus (Munster, 1839) is probably a juvenile stage of C.
orbiculatus, and Eryon oppeli Woodward, 1866, must be ascribed to Rosenfeldia Garassino, Teruzzi & Dalla Vecchia, 1996.
Finally, we were not able to confirm thè systematic validity of Mecochirus dubius (Munster, 1839) as a result of thè poor state of
preservation of thè originai specimens. Maglia denticulata must be considered nomen dubium because thè originai specimen belonging
to this species is lost.
Key words: Crastacea, Decapoda, lithographic limestones. Upper Jurassic, Germany.
Zusammenfassung - Die oberjurassische ZehnfuBkrebs-Fauna von Solnhofen: Neubearbeitung der Typen aus alten Beschreibun-
gen. Teil I. Unterordnungen Astacidea, Thalassinidea und Palinura.
Die Fauna dekapoder Crastaceen aus Solnhofen und Eichstàtt ist seit den Arbeiten von Schlotheim (1820, 1822), Germar (1827),
v. Meyer (1836), Munster (1839), Oppel (1861, 1862), Woodward (1866), und v. Knebel (1907) nicht mehr revidiert worden. Da viele
Arten auf wenige oder schlecht erhaltene Stiicke begrundet sind, erschien eine Neubearbeitung der Originalstticke, die heute in ver-
schiedenen Museumssammlungen aufbewahrt wurden, unerlàsslich, um deren systematische Giiltigkeit zu priifen.
Dieses Review ist in zwei Teile gegliedert: Unterordnungen Astacidea Latreille, 1803, Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831, und Palinura
Latreille, 1803, im ersten Teil und Uberfamilie Penaeoidea Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1815, sowie Unterordnung Caridea Dana, 1852 im
zweiten Teil (Schweigert & Garassino, in press).
4
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
Die Original-Stichprobe der Unterordnung Astacidea Latreille, 1803, bestehend aus 60 Stiicken (urspriinglich 515), wurde
unter Einschluss von neu entdeckten Exemplaren aus Privatsammlungen untersucht, um die morphologischen Beschreibungen zu
komplettieren.Das Review resultierte in der Feststellung der taxonomischen Gultigkeit fùr folgende Arten: Eryma modestiforme
(Schlotheim, 1822), E. veltheimii (Munster, 1839), Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822), und Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim,
1822) (Familie Erymidae Van Straelen, 1924); Pseudastacus pustulosus (Munster, 1839) (Familie Protastacidae Albrecht, 1983);
Stenochirus angustus (Munster, 1839), und S. mayeri Oppel, 1862 (Familie Stenochiridae Beurlen, 1930); Glyphea pseudoscyllarus
(Schlotheim, 1822), G. tenuis Oppel, 1861, G. verrucosa Munster, 1839, und Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Munster, 1839) (Familie
Glypheidae Winckler, 1883); Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim, 1822) (Family Mecochiridae Van Straelen, 1924). Gleichzeitig
ergaben sich aus der vergleichenden Studie die folgenden Synonymien: Eryma leptodactylinum (Germar, 1 827) = E. modestiforme ,
und Mecochirus bajeri Germar, 1 827 = M. longimanatus. AuBerdem erkannten wir, dass Pseudastacus muensteri Oppel, 1 862, als das
Weibchen von P. pustulosus und Mecochirus brevimanus (Munster, 1839) als das Weibchen von M. longimanatus betrachtet werden
muss. Die Gattungszugehòrigkeit von “ Glyphea^ verrucosa Munster, 1839 ist noch immer unklar.
Die Original-Stichprobe der Unterordnung Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831, besteht aus 9 Stiicken (urspriinglich 19). Das Review
ergab die taxonomische Gultigkeit der folgenden Arten: Etallonia longimana (Munster, 1839), und Magila latimana Munster, 1839
(Familie Axiidae Huxley, 1879); Orhomalus deformis (Oppel, 1862) (Familie indet.). AuBerdem ergab sich die folgende Synonymien:
Magila robusta Oppel, 1862 = M. desmarestii (Munster, 1839).
Die Original-Stichprobe der Unterordnung Palinura Latreille, 1803, bestehend aus 44 Exemplaren (urspriinglich 446), wurde zur Ver-
vollstàndigung der morphologischen Beschreibung zusammen mit neu entdeckten Stiicken aus Privatsammlungen untersucht. Dabei ergab
sich die taxonomische Gultigkeit der folgenden Arten: Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1 822), C. orbiculatus (Mtinster, 1 839), C. elon-
gatus (Munster, 1839), Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1822), und Knebelia bilobata (Miinster, 1839) (Familie Eryonidae De Haan, 1841);
Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Miinster, 1 839) (Familie Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1 874); Palinurina longipes (Munster, 1 839), und P.
tenera Oppel, 1 862 (Familie Palinuridae Latreille, 1 802); Cancrinos claviger Munster, 1 839 (Familie Cancrinidae Beurlen, 1 930). Hierbei
ergaben sich folgende Synonymien: Cycleryon armatus (v. Knebel, 1907) = C. orbiculatus (Miinster, 1839), Knebelia schuberti (v. Meyer,
1836) = C. propinquus, Palinurina pygmea Munster, 1839 = P. longipes, Cancrinos latipes Munster, 1839 = C. claviger,. Dariiber hinaus
erkannten wir aufgrund der kiirzlich erfolgten Neubearbeitung durch Schweigert (200 la), dass Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1827) das
Weibchen zu C. propinquus darstellt. Cycleryon subrotundus (Miinster, 1 839) ist vermutlich nur ein Jugendstadium von C. orbiculatus, und
Eryon oppeli Woodward, 1 866, muss zur Gattung Rosenfeldia Garassino, Teruzzi & Dalla Vecchia, 1 996, gestellt werden.
SchlieBlich waren wir aufgrund der schlechten Erhaltung der Originalstiicke nicht in der Lage, die taxonomische Gultigkeit von
Mecochirus dubius (Munster, 1 839) zu bestàtigen. Magila denticulata muss auBerdem als nomen dubium angesehen warden, da keine
Syntypen dieser Art mehr vorhanden sind, und die urspriingliche Beschreibung ungenugend ist.
Schlusselwòrter: Crustacea, Decapoda, Plattenkalke, Oberjura, Deutschland.
Riassunto - La fauna a crostacei decapodi del Giurassico superiore di Solnhofen: revisione degli esemplari tipo dalle descrizioni
originali. Parte I. Infraordini Astacidea, Thalassinidea e Palinura.
La fauna a crostacei decapodi di Solnhofen e Eichstatt non è stata più oggetto di revisione dopo gli studi condotti da Schlotheim
(1820, 1822), Germar (1827), v. Meyer (1836), Munster (1839), Oppel (1861, 1862), Woodward (1866) e v. Knebel (1907). Visto che
molte specie sono state descritte sulla base di pochi esemplari o di esemplari in cattivo stato di conservazione, una revisione del cam¬
pione originale, attualmente depositato presso alcuni musei tedeschi era quanto mai necessaria per stabilire la validità sistematica delle
specie descritte. Questa revisione ha avuto come oggetto di studio sia i decapodi natanti che quelli reptanti.
La revisione viene divisa in due parti: gli infraordini Astacidea Latreille, 1803, Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831 e Palinura Latreille,
1803, nella prima e la superfamiglia Penaeoidea Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1815 e Tinfraordine Caridea Dana, 1852, nella seconda (Sch¬
weigert & Garassino, in stampa).
11 campione originale delTinfraordine Astacidea Latreille, 1803, formato da 60 esemplari (originariamente 515), è stato integrato
con esemplari rinvenuti in nuove località e depositati presso collezioni private così da approfondire le descrizioni morfologiche. Questa
revisione ha documentato la validità sistematica delle seguenti specie: Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822), E. veltheimii (Munster,
1839), Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822) e Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822) (famiglia Erymidae Van Straelen, 1924);
Pseudastacus pustulosus (Munster, 1839) (famiglia Protastacidae Albrecht, 1983); Stenochirus angustus (Miinster, 1839) e S. mayeri
Oppel, 1862 (famiglia Stenochiridae Beurlen, 1930); Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822), G. tenuis Oppel, 1861, G. verru¬
cosa Munster, 1839 e Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Munster, 1839) (famiglia Glypheidae Winckler, 1883); Mecochirus longimanatus
(Schlotheim, 1822) (famiglia Mecochiridae Van Straelen, 1924). Lo studio comparativo tra le specie appartenenti allo stesso genere ha
messo in evidenza le seguenti sinonimie: Eryma leptodactylina (Germar, 1827) = E. modestiforme e Mecochirus bajeri Germar, 1827 =
M. longimanatus. Inoltre, riteniamo che Pseudastacus muensteri Oppel, 1862, sia la femmina di P. pustulosus e Mecochirus brevimanus
(Munster, 1839) sia la femmina di M. longimanatus. La posizione sistematica di Glyphea verrucosa Miinster, 1839, è ancora incerta.
Il campione originale delTinfraordine Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831, si compone di 9 esemplari (originariamente 19). Questa revisione
ha documentato la validità sistematica delle seguenti specie: Etallonia longimana (Miinster, 1839) e Magila latimana Miinster, 1839
(famiglia Axiidae Huxley, 1879); Orhomalus deformis (Oppel, 1862) (famiglia indeterminata). Lo studio comparativo tra le specie apparte¬
nenti allo stesso genere ha messo in evidenza la seguente sinonimia: Magila robusta Oppel, 1862 = M. desmarestii (Munster, 1839).
Il campione originale delTinfraordine Palinura Latreille, 1803, formato da 44 esemplari (originariamente 446), è stato integrato
con esemplari rinvenuti in nuove località e depositati presso collezioni private così da approfondire le descrizioni morfologiche.
Questa revisione ha documentato la validità sistematica delle seguenti specie: Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1 822), C. orbicu¬
latus (Munster, 1839), C. elongatus (Munster, 1839), Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1822) e Knebelia bilobata (Miinster, 1839)
(famiglia Eryonidae De Haan, 1841); Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839) (famiglia Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874);
Palinurina longipes (Munster, 1839) e P. tenera Oppel, 1862 (famiglia Palinuridae Latreille, 1802); Cancrinos claviger Munster,
1839 (famiglia Cancrinidae Beurlen, 1930). Lo studio comparativo tra le specie apparteneti allo stesso genere ha messo in evidenza
le seguenti sinonimie: Cycleryon armatus (v. Knebel, 1907) = C. orbiculatus (Munster, 1839), Knebelia schuberti (v. Meyer, 1836) =
C propinquus, Palinurina pygmea Munster, 1839 = P. longipes, Cancrinos latipes Miinster, 1839 = C. claviger. Inoltre, riconosciamo
che Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1827) è la femmina di C. propinquus grazie alla recente revisione di Schweigert (200 la), che
Cycleryon subrotundus (Miinster, 1839) è un probabile stadio giovanile di C. orbiculatus e che Eryon oppeli Woodward, 1866, deve
essere attribuito a Rosenfeldia Garassino, Teruzzi & Dalla Vecchia, 1996.
Infine, non siamo in grado di confermare la validità sistematica di Mecochirus dubius (Munster, 1839) a causa del cattivo stato
di conservazione degli esemplari originali. Magila denticulata deve essere considerata nomen dubium in quanto l’unico esemplare
originale appartenente a questa specie è andato perduto.
Parole chiave: Crustacea, Decapoda, calcare litografico, Giurassico superiore, Germania.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
5
AGE AND SETTING OF LOCALITIES
The lithographic limestones of thè Upper Jurassic
in southern Germany comprise a large set of localities
of different ages and settings spanning an area of sev-
eral hundreds of kilometres (Fig. 1). The localities in
southern Franconia are often summarised as “Solnhofen
Lithographic Limestones”. Many fossils both in old col-
lections and new material from fossil traders are labelled
as coming from “Solnhofen”. This is very misleading and
makes difficult to recognise thè evolutionary trends and
locai differences in palaeoecology. Only a very intimate
knowledge of thè locai lithologies permits distinguishing
thè exact origin of thè material. Recently, however, strati-
graphically well-placed material comes from several
scientific excavations. Besides, there exist private collec-
tions which focus on special sites. The biostratigraphic
framework of thè late Kimmeridgian (Upper Jurassic)
was worked out by one of thè authors (Schweigert et al,
1 996); however knowledge of thè succession of ammo¬
nite faunas from thè Tithonian is stili in a preliminary
stage.
The oldest lithographic limestones of southern Ger¬
many, most recently discovered and dated by ammonites,
occur in northem Franconia, at Wattendorf near Bamberg.
They are of late Kimmeridgian age (Pseudomutabilis
Zone). Another decapod-bearing locality, not yet pre-
cisely dated, occurs in thè surroundings of Regensburg
(Ebenwies). A more important fossil site nearby is that of
Brunn, a papery shale of late Kimmeridgian age deposited
in a very shallow lagoon surrounded by calcareous green
algae meadows, coral reefs, and small islands. Somewhat
younger, but stili of late Kimmeridgian age is thè Nus-
plingen Lithographic Limestone in SW Germany, which
is famous for its richness in fossil sharks and decapod
crustaceans. This limestone was deposited in about 100
m deep lagoon surrounded by sponge-microbial mounds
and islands. In thè east of Eichstatt in Franconia, several
localities yielded decapod crustaceans from lithographic
limestones around thè Kimmeridgian/Tithonian boundary,
depending on thè definition of thè lower boundary of thè
Tithonian. Excavations by thè Jura-Museum (Eichstatt)
in thè siliceous lithographic limestones of Zandt and thè
more biodetritic limestones of thè nearby Òchselberg yield
a very diverse decapod fauna in an excellent state of pres-
ervation, among them several new taxa. Other decapod
faunas similar in age to those of Zandt come from quarries
in thè north of Eichstatt (e.g. Blumenberg, Schemfeld,
Wintershof). Many old taxa were first described from
this area. The “classical” lithographic limestones of Sol¬
nhofen and Langenaltheim have an early Tithonian age,
clearly younger than those of thè nearby Eichstatt district.
Apart from mass occurrences of planktonic crinoids ( Sac -
cocoma ), these limestones are very poor in fossils. The
vertebrate fauna and other criteria suggest a more pelagic
setting. Both thè sections of thè Eichstatt and Solnhofen
districts of micritic limestones deposited in larger shallow
basins, thè margins of which are poorly known, because
today for economie reasons only thè purest limestones in
thè centrai parts of thè basins are quarried. The Solnhofen
Lithographic Limestone Formation is usually overlain by
a hardground or another disconformity followed by thè
more biodetrital and silica-rich Moemsheim Formation
which also has yielded many decapod crustaceans.
Fig. 1 - Geographic map of thè fossiliferous localities.
6
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PREVIOUS WORKS AND PRESENT STATE OF THE ART
The bulk of thè decapod fauna of thè lithographic
limestones in southern Germany is described in mono-
graphs or short papers of thè 19th century (Schlotheim,
1820, 1822; Germar, 1827; v. Meyer, 1836; Miinster,
1839; Oppel, 1861, 1862; Woodward, 1866). Around thè
millennium, thè previous discoveries of modem eryonids
during deep sea expeditions encouraged thè study of fossil
forms (Peiser, 1904; v. Knebel, 1907). In thè first half of
thè 20th century, both Beurlen and Glaessner, thè lead-
ing authorities of fossil crustaceans in Europe, almost
excluded thè decapods from thè lithographic limestones
from their scientific works. Recently, about 56 valid taxa
from Franconia and four others from thè isolated local-
ity of Nusplingen in Swabia are described. Only a few of
them were briefly revised by Forster (1966, 1967, 1973,
1977). After his sudden death in 1987, thè study of fossil
decapods from Germany declined. From thè late 1990
onwards, both scientific excavations in eastem Bavaria
(Brunn), southern Franconia (Schamhaupten) and in Nus¬
plingen (Swabia) re-stimulated thè research activities of
decapods (Garassino & Schweigert, 2004; Garassino et
al., 2005; Polz, 1999, 2000; Schweigert 200 la, 200 lb,
200 le, 2002, 2003, 2004a, 2004b; Schweigert & Dietl,
1999; Schweigert & Frattigiani, 2005; Schweigert & Ga¬
rassino, 2003, 2004, 2005a, 2005b, in press; Schweigert &
Ròper, 2001; Schweigert et al., 2000, 2003). At that time it
became obvious that both for palaeoenvironmental recon-
struction and systematic palaeontology, it was necessary to
separate thè fossil material of each locality. Another strong
pulse was given by thè monographic documentation of
“Solnhofen” fossils which were stored in various muse-
ums around thè globe and in several excellent private col-
lections (Frickhinger, 1994, 1999). Frickhinger’s aim was
a complete documentation of all taxa of animals and plants
occurring in thè “Solnhofen” limestones. From this other-
wise unavailable data pool thè existence of many new taxa
became clear. Additionally, good material of rare or poorly
preserved taxa carne to light often allowing a review.
MATERIAL
This review is based on 113 specimens among thè
infraorders Astacidea Latreille, 1803, Thalassinidea
Latreille, 1831, and Palinura Latreille, 1803. The most
part of thè originai sample, 980 specimens, was destroyed
during World War II. The survived specimens, today
housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-
Universitàt in Berlin, thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich, thè Geological
Institute and Museum of thè University of Halle, and
Natur-Museum Senckenberg in Frankfurt am Main, were
reviewed in order to confimi their systematic placement.
Since it was impossible to clean thè originai specimens of
some species in order to describe some morphological charac-
ters not reported in thè originai descriptions, some specimens
from Frattigiani, Rudel, Tischlinger, Wulf, and Koschny
private collections were used to expand thè morphological
descriptions of thè following species: E. modestiforme, P.
minuta, P. muensteri, G. tenuis, S. angustus, C. elongatus, P.
roettenbacheri, P. longipes, P tenera, and M. latimana.
One specimen in lateral view, housed in thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich, was used to describe for thè first time thè shape
of abdominal somites and thè tail fan of Cancrinos clav-
iger.
Finally, thè total length of thè specimens is taken dor-
sally from thè tip of thè rostmm to thè distai extremity
of thè telson and thè three dimensionai reconstructions of
thè studied species reported thè morphological characters
observed in thè originai and new specimens belonging to
thè studied species.
The systematic palaeontology used in this paper follows
thè recent classification proposed by Martin & Davis (2001 ).
Acronyms. MNHB: Museum fur Naturkunde der
Humboldt-Universitàt (Berlin, Germany); BSPG: Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
(Munich, Germany); SMF: Natur-Museum Senckenberg
(Frankfurt am Main, Germany); SMNS: Staatliches
Museum fur Naturkunde (Stuttgart, Germany); IGH:
Geological Institute and Museum of thè University
(Halle, Germany); BM: British Naturai History Museum
(London, Great Britain).
SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY
Infraorder Astacidea Latreille, 1803
Family Erymidae Van Straelen, 1924
Genus Eryma v. Meyer, 1 840
Type species: Macrourites modestiformis Schlotheim,
1822
Solnhofen species: Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim,
1822); Eryma veltheimii (Miinster, 1839)
Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1 822)
Fig. 8, PI. I (fig. 1), PI. XI (fìgs. 1,2)
1822 - Macrourites modestiformis Schlotheim; p. 29, PI. 2 (fig. 3)
1822 - Macrourites modestiformis Schlotheim in Desmarest; PI. 1 1 (fig. 5)
1827 - Astacus leptodaetylus Germar; p. 100, PI. 1 (fig. 4), nov. syn.
1839 - Glyphea modestiformis Miinster; p. 19, PI. 9 (figs. 1-3)
1839 - Glyphea crassula Miinster; p. 17, PI. 8 (fig. 5)
1839 - Glyphea elongata Miinster; p. 18, PI. 8 (fig. 8) (not figs. 11-12)
1 839 - Glyphea laevigata Miinster; p. 20, PI. 9 (figs. 5-7)
not 1839 - Glyphea Veltheimii Miinster; p. 22, PI. 10 (fig. 1) = Eryma
veltheimii, holotype
1852 - Astacus modestiformis Quenstedt; p. 268, PI. 20 (fig. 15)
1855 - Glyphea modestiformis Miinster in Fraas; p. 94
1857 - Glyphea modestiformis Miinster in Quenstedt; p. 807, PI. 99
(fig. 29)
not 1857 - Glyphea Veltheimii Miinster in Quenstedt; p. 807, PI. 100
(fig. 1 ) = Eryma westphali Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
7
1861 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 358
1861 - Ery’ma leptodactylina (Germar) in Oppel; p. 358
not 1861 - Eryma Veltheimi Miinster in Oppel; p. 358
not 1861 - Eryma major Oppel; p. 358 = Erymastacus major , from
Nusplingen
not 1861 - Eryma punctata Oppel; p. 359 = Ery’ma punctatum, from
Nusplingen
1862 -Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 33, PI. 6 (figs. 5-8)
1 862 - Eryma leptodactylina (Germar) in Oppel; p. 35, PI. 7 (figs. 1-4)
not 1862 - Ery’ma Veltheimi Miinster in Oppel; p. 36, PI. 7 (fig. 5) = E.
veltheimii
not 1 862 - Eryma major Oppel in Oppel; p. 37, PI. 8 (fig. 3) = Eryma¬
stacus major
not 1862 - Eryma punctata Oppel in Oppel; p. 38, PI. 8 (fig. 4) = E.
punctatum
1867 - Astacus modestiformis Quenstedt; p. 320, PI. 25 (fig. 15)
1885 - Astacus modestiformis Quenstedt; p. 409, PI. 32 (fig. 6)
1904 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 174
1904 - Ery’ma leptodactylina (Germar) in Walther; p. 174
not 1904 - Eryma Veltheimi Miinster in Walther; p. 174 = E. westphali
Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000
not 1908 - Eryma veltheimi Munster in Engel; p. 470 = E. westphali
Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000
1925 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 272
1925 - Eryma leptodactylina (Germar) in Van Straelen; p. 273
1928 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Beurlen; p. 164
1 928 - Eryma pseudoventrosa Beurlen; p. 163
not 1928 - Eryma punctata Oppel in Beurlen; p. 164 = E. punctatum
1928 - Clytia leptodactylina (Germar) in Beurlen; p. 170
not 1928 - Clytia veltheimi (Miinster) in Beurlen; p. 170 = E. veltheimii
1929 - Clytia leptodactylus (Germar) in Glaessner; p. 116
1929 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 156
1929 - Eryma pseudoventrosa Beurlen in Glaessner; p. 158
1931 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Roll; p. 75
1961 - Clytia leptodactylus (Germar) in Kuhn; p. 22
1961 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Kuhn; p. 22
1965 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 138, PI. 2 (fig. 5)
1966 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 118, PI. 16
(figs. 8?-9), PI. 17 (fig. 1)
1969 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Malz; p. 298, Text-fig. 7
1969 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; R 455, Text-
fig. 258/4
1 994 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 118, Text-
figs. 201-202
1 996 - Eryma in Ròper, Rothgaenger & Rothgaenger; Text-fig. 90
1997 - Eryma elongata (Munster) in Dietl, Dietl, Kapitzke, Rieter,
Schweigert, Ilg & Hugger; PI. 2 (fig. 2)
1998 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Ròper & Rothgaenger; p.
50, Text-fig. 74, PI. 1 (fig. 86)
2000 - Eryma modestiformis (Schlotheim) in Ròper, Rothgaenger &
Rothgaenger; p. 91, Fig. 108
2000 - Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim) in Schweigert, Dietl &
Ròper; p. 4, Text-fig. la, PI. 1 (figs. 1-5)
2001 - Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim) in Dietl & Schweigert; p.
71, Text-fig. 86
2005b - Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim) in Schweigert & Garassino;
p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened; cer-
vical groove deep and moderately inclined, not strongly
sinuous and lying almost in thè middle part of carapace;
postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves nearly parallel
and not joined; gastro-orbital groove weak; antennal and
ventral grooves deep; hepatic notch and muscle adductor
testis deep; rostrum short with three small supralateral
teeth; antennal spine well developed; pereiopods I-III
chelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods
II-III; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Holotype: Macrourites modestiformis (= Eryma
modestiforme ), MNHB K 37 MB (Schlotheim, 1822 - PI.
2, fig. 3; length of thè specimen: 2.5 cm), housed in thè
Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in
Berlin.
Our studies revealed that Astacus leptodactylus from
Solnhofen and figured by Germar (1827 - PI. 1, fig. 4) is
synonym with Eryma modestiforme , as discussed below.
This specimen, thè holotype of Germar’s species, was
said to be lost (Forster, 1966), but recently reappeared in
thè collection of thè Geological Institute and Museum of
thè University of Halle (comm. by N. Hauschke, Halle).
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: Eichstàtt.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 80 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 27 from thè Reden-
bacher collection and 53 from thè collection of thè Bayer-
ische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich. We studied of this originai sample thè holotype
by Schlotheim, housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der
Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin, and 1 1 additional speci¬
mens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palà¬
ontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we identified
seven specimens, illustrated by Munster (1839) and two
specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). Two specimens
(BSPG AS Vili 80, AS I 623) were not illustrated by thè
authors. We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Munster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 191 - Munster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 12)
- length of thè specimen: 1 .5 cm
BSPG AS VII 193 - Munster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 194 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS VII 195 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 196 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 197 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 198 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS Vili 81 - Oppel (1862), PI. 6 (fig. 6)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS Vili 82 - Oppel (1862), PI. 6 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
Oppel (1862) reported 61 specimens which he
assigned to Eryma leptodactylina (Germar, 1827), so
divided: 18 from thè Redenbacher collection and 43
from thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich. Today, we know
of this originai sample eight specimens, housed in Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich, in which we identified four specimens, illus¬
trated by Munster (1839) and four specimens, illustrated
by Oppel (1862). We report thè list of thè specimens,
studied by Munster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 187 - Munster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 9)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
8
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
BSPG AS VII 188 - Munster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 8)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 189 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS VII 190 - Munster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 10)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS VI 15 - Oppel (1862), PI. 7 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS VI 16 - Oppel (1862), PI. 7 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
BSPG AS VI 17 - Oppel (1862), PI. 7 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS VIII 79 - Oppel (1862), PI. 7 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
One specimen (n. cat. 9333 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè tail fan of this species, not preserved
in thè originai sample.
Description. Small-sized erymid with strongly tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical, laterally flattened.
Cervical groove deep, lying almost at thè middle part of
thè carapace. Rostrum short with three small supralateral
teeth directed forward. Postcervical and branchiocardiac
grooves nearly parallel and not joined near their lower
ends. Gastro-orbital groove deep. Antennal and ventral
grooves deep. Hepatic notch and muscle adductor testis
deep. Antennal spine well developed. Ocular incision
large and deep. Spines short and strong located in gastric
region. Pits small located in antennal, cardiac, branchial,
and pterygostomial regions.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal length
with small pits on tergal surface. Somite VI subsquare.
Pleurae of somites I-VI with pointed distai extremity.
Telson subtriangular with rounded distai extremity, deep
longitudinal median groove, a pair of small median spines
and a pair of small spines located in thè distai part of lateral
margins. Protopod subrectangular. Uropodal endopod with
a strong median longitudinal carina and a small spine in thè
distai part of outer margin. Uropodal exopod with a strong
median longitudinal carina, two distai spines on thè outer
margin (one longer and one shorter) and rounded diaeresis
with serrate upper margin having one longer median spine.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped
elongate having thè first proximal article with two strong
distai spines and second proximal article with one strong
distai spine, all located in thè lower margin. Antennular
peduncles thin of which thè distai one carries two elon¬
gate multiarticulate flagella of equal length. Antennal
articles strong and stout of which thè distai one carries a
strong elongate multiarticulate flagellum, twice thè body
length. Scaphocerite elongate and triangular with basicer-
ite having a strong distai spine in thè lower margin.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with short and stout
chela (ratio propodus/fixed finger = 1/1). Movable and
fixed fingers of equal length with curved distai extremity.
Inner margins of movable and fixed fingers with small
rounded teeth. Surface of merus, carpus, propodus and
movable finger covered with small pits and tubercles.
Chela of pereiopod III longer than chela of pereiopod
II. Pereiopods IV-V achelate. Pereiopod IV longer and
stronger than pereiopod V. Lower margin of propodus of
pereiopod IV with a row of downcurved spines.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unsegmented
peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticulate flagella.
Discussion. Forster (1966) reviewed this genus,
describing 35 species and pointing out that E. mode-
stiforme (Schlotheim, 1822) differs from thè other spe¬
cies of thè same genus by its typical midiine position
of thè cervical groove. Among thè species described by
Forster (1966), E. verrucosa (Munster, 1839) cannot be
assigned to a genus because of thè incompleteness of thè
lectotype (see Pustulina minuta in this paper). Moreover,
Forster (1966) did not include among thè studied species
of Eryma, thè species from thè Upper Cretaceous of thè
United States, described by Rathbun (1923, 1926, 1935):
E. americana Rathbun, 1923 (Black Creek Fm., N Caro¬
lina), E. flecta Rathbun, 1926 (Ripley Fm., Tennessee)
and E. stantoni Rathbun, 1935 (Ripley Fm., Alabama);
thè species from thè Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of
Lebanon, described by Roger (1946): E. cretacea Roger,
1946; thè species from thè Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian
- Tithonian) of Madagascar described by Secretan ( 1 964):
E. madagascariensis Secretan, 1964, E. granulifera
Secretan, 1964, and E1, australis (Secretan, 1964).
Feldmann (1979), Garassino (1996) and Schweigert
et al. (2000) described three new species to add to
those described by thè above-mentioned authors: E.
foersteri Feldmann, 1979 (United States - Callovian),
E. meyeri Garassino, 1996 (Italy - Sinemurian), and E.
westphali Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000 (Germany
- Kimmeridgian). Finally, Crónier & Courville (2004)
described E. burgundiaca (France - Callovian), and
Feldmann & Titus (2006) described E. jungostrix (United
States - Oxfordian).
Today, Eryma v. Meyer, 1 840, known from thè Lower
Jurassic (Sinemurian) to thè Upper Cretaceous (Cenoma¬
nian) of Europe (Germany, France, England, Russia and
Italy), Africa (Morocco), Iran, Madagascar, Lebanon,
Antarctic Peninsula, Canada, United States, and South
America (Argentina), includes 47 species.
Oppel (1862), describing E. leptodactylina (Germar,
1827), pointed out that this species was similar to E.
modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822) and E. veltheimii
(Munster, 1839), but it was different in exhibiting larger
chelae on pereiopod I. However, thè study of thè eight
originai specimens by Munster and Oppel, and thè very
poorly preserved holotype of Germar’s species allowed
recognition of some morphological characters, such
as thè midiine position of thè cervical groove, rostrum
with three small supralateral teeth, short and stout chela
of pereiopod I not as long as described by Oppel (ratio
propodus/fixed finger =1/1, apart from thè onthogenetic
stage of thè studied specimens) and telson with a deep
median longitudinal groove and a small spine in thè
median part of thè lateral margin. Thus, it may be useful
to include E. leptodactylina in E. modestiforme. These
characters distinguish E. modestiforme from E. veltheimii
having a rostrum with three strong supralateral teeth and
very elongate chela of pereiopod I (ratio propodus/fixed
finger = 2/1) (see E. veltheimii in this paper).
Eryma veltheimii (Munster, 1839)
Fig. 8, PI. I (fig. 2), PI. XI (figs. 3, 4)
1839 - Glyphea Veltheimii Munster; p. 22, PI. 10 (fig. 1)
1 848 - Eryma Veltheimi (Munster) in Bronn; p. 468
1 853 - Glyphea Veltheimi Munster in Frischmann; p. 28
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
9
not 1855 - Glyphea Veltheimi Mùnster in Fraas; p. 94 = Eryma west-
phali Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000
not 1857 - Glyphea Veltheimii Miinster in Quenstedt; p. 807, PI. 100
(fig. 1 ) = £. westphali Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper, 2000
1861 - Eryma Veltheimi (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 358
1862 - Eryma Veltheimi (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 36, PI. 7 (fig. 5)
1996 - Eryma in Ròper, Rothgaenger & Rothgaenger; Text-fig. 91
2000 - Eryma veltheimi (Miinster) in Schweigert, Dietl & Ròper; p. 7,
Text-fig. le, PI. 4 (figs. 1-3)
2005b - Eryma veltheimii (Miinster) in Schweigert & Garassino; p. 498
Diagnosis; carapace cylindrical laterally flattened; cer-
vical groove deep, and moderately inclined not strongly
sinuous; postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves nearly
parallel and joined near their lower ends; gastro-orbital
groove weak; antennal and ventral grooves deep; hepatic
notch and muscle adductor testis deep; rostrum short
with three strong supralateral teeth; antennal spine well
developed; pereiopods I-III chelate; pereiopod I larger
and stronger than pereiopods II-III; uropodal exopod with
diaeresis.
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS VII 186 a-b (Mun-
ster, 1839 - PI. 10, fig. 1; Oppel, 1862 - PI. 7, fig. 5),
housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palàontolo-
gie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: labelled as coming from Eichstàtt;
however, based upon thè lithology of thè rock matrix, thè
specimen comes from thè Kapfelberg quarry near Kel-
heim (Schweigert et al., 2000).
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen,
ascribed to this species, and housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS VII 186 a-b -Miinster (1839), PI. 10 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm (thè specimen is preserved
as part and counter-part; Miinster figured thè specimen
with thè tail fan opens in dorsal view; in realty thè tail
fan preserves thè right uropods overlapped onto thè last
abdominal somites, as figured by Oppel).
BSPG AS VII 186 a-b - Oppel (1862), PI. 7 (fig. 5)
Description. Large erymid with strongly tuberculate
exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Cervical groove deep in thè anterior part of thè carapace.
Rostrum short with three strong supralateral teeth directed
forward. Postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves nearly
parallel and joined near their lower ends. Gastro-orbital
groove weak. Antennal and ventral grooves deep. Hepatic
notch and muscle adductor testis deep. Antennal spine
well developed. Ocular incision large and deep. Spines
short and strong located in gastric region. Pits small
located in antennal, cardiac, branchial, and pterygosto-
mial regions.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal length
with small pits on tergal surface. Somite VI subsquare.
Pleurae of somites I-V with pointed distai extremity.
Telson triangular with rounded distai extremity and
deep median longitudinal groove. Protopod subrectan¬
gular. Uropodal endopod with a strong median longitu¬
dinal carina. Uropodal exopod with a strong longitudinal
median carina, one small distai spine on thè outer margin,
and rounded diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped,
antennulae and antennae not preserved.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with elongate chela
(ratio propodus/fixed finger = 2/1). Movable and fixed
fingers of equal length with curved distai extremity, and
edentate inner margins. Upper margin of propodus with
one strong distai spine. Surface of merus, carpus, pro¬
podus and movable finger covered with small pits and
tubercles. Chelae of pereiopods II-III of equal length.
Pereiopods IV-V achelate. Lower margin of propodus of
pereiopod IV with a row of downeurved spines.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Miinster (1839) described this species on
one specimen from Eichstàtt. Even though incomplete, thè
author identified some morphological characters, such as
thè rostrum with three strong supralateral teeth and very
elongate chelae of pereiopod I, in order to distinguish
this species from E. modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822).
The study of thè originai specimen by Miinster confirms
thè validity of these characters as diagnostic, justifying
thè systematic validity of E. veltheimii (Miinster, 1839).
Moreover, thè presence of three characters not described
by Miinster, such as thè joining of postcervical and bran¬
chiocardiac grooves in their lower ends, thè upper margin
of propodus of pereiopod I with one strong distai spine
and thè telson with lateral margin spineless, are useful to
document thè systematic validity of this species and its
morphological differences from E. modestiforme.
Genus Palaeastacus Bell, 1850
Type species: Astacus sussexiensis Mantell, 1833
Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822)
Fig. 8, PI. I (fig. 3), PI. XI (fig. 5)
1822 - Macrourites fuciformis Schlotheim; p. 30, PI. 2 (fig. 2)
1827 - Astacus spinimanus Germar; p. 101, PI. 1 (fig. 3)
1829 -Astacus fuciformis Holl; p. 153
1839 - Glyphea fuciformis Miinster; p. 16, PI. 8 (figs. 1-2)
1839 - Glyphea intermedia Miinster; p. 17, PI. 8 (figs. 6-7)
1839 - Glyphea crassula Miinster; p. 17, PI. 8 (fig. 4) (not fig. 5)
1839 - Glyphea elongata Miinster; p. 18, PI. 8 (figs. 11-12) (not figs.
8-10)
1848 - Eryma fuciformis Bronn; p. 467
1852 -Astacus fuciformis Quenstedt; p. 268, PI. 20 (fig. 14)
1861 - Eryma elongata Mùnster; p. 358
1861 - Eryma fuciformis Schlotheim; p. 359
1862 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 41, PI. 9 (figs. 2-6)
1862 -Eryma elongata Mùnster in Oppel; p. 37, PI. 8 (figs. 1-2)
not 1862 - Palaeastacus solitarius Oppel; p. 46, PI. 1 1 (fig. 4) = Pus-
tuli na suevica
1867 - Astacus fuciformis Quenstedt; p. 320, PI. 25 (fig. 14)
1885 - Astacus fuciformis Quenstedt; p. 409, PI. 32 (fig. 7)
1904 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Eryma elongata Mùnster in Walther; p. 1 74
1925 - Enoploclytia fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 285
not 1925 - Palaeastacus solitarius Oppel in Van Straelen; p. 289 = P
suevica
1928 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Beurlen; p. 164
1928 - Clytia elongata Mùnster in Beurlen; p. 170
1929 - Clytia sp. juv. in Glaessner; p. 1 19
10
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
1 929 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 1 54
not 1929 - Palaeastacus solitarius Oppel in Glaessner; p. 290 = P.
suevica
1961 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Kuhn; p. 22
not 1963 - Glyphea fuciformis Miinster in Miiller; p. 117, Text-fig. 157
(= Pustulina minuta)
1966 - Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 130, Text-
fig. 25
1 968 - Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Leich; p. 72
1 969 - Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Malz; p. 299, Text-
fig. 8
not 1978 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Miiller; Text-fig. 148a (=
P minuta )
1994 - Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 122,
Text-figs. 218-219
2005b - Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Schweigert & Ga-
rassino; p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
dorsal margin dentate; cervical and branchiocardiac
grooves deep; gastro-orbital, postcervical, and ventral
grooves weak; antennal groove deep; hepatic notch and
muscle adductor testis weak; postcervical and branchio¬
cardiac grooves never joined; rostrum short with three
supralateral teeth; antennal spine well developed; pereio-
pods I-III chelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than
pereiopods II-III; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Holotype: Macrourites fuciformis (= Palaeastacus
fuciformis ), MNHB K 36 MB. A. 251 (Schlotheim, 1822
- PI. 2, fig. 2; length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm), housed in
thè Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in
Berlin.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen (?).
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 70 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 22 from thè Reden-
bacher collection, three from thè collection of Prof. O.
Fraas in Stuttgart (SMNS, but not traceable) and 45 from
thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Pala-
ontologie und Geologie in Munich. We studied of this
originai sample thè holotype by Schlotheim, housed in
thè Museum fùr Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt
in Berlin, and nine specimens, housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich in which we identifìed five specimens, illustrated
by Miinster (1839) and four specimens, illustrated by
Oppel (1862). Two specimens (BSPG AS I 620, AS VI
14 a-b) were identifìed as belonging to originai collec-
tions thanks to thè 20th century labels. However, it was
impossible to establish if they were studied by one of thè
above-mentioned authors because thè specimens were not
illustrated. We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 183 - Miinster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 4.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 184 - Miinster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 185 - Miinster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 4.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 192 - Miinster (1839), PI. 8 (fig. 11)
- length of thè specimen: 1.5 cm
BSPG AS VI 11 - Oppel (1862), PI. 9 (figs. 5-6)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS VI 12 - Oppel (1862), PI. 9 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm
BSPG AS VI 13 - Oppel (1862), PI. 9 (figs. 2-3)
- length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm
BSPG AS VI 18 - Oppel (1862), PI. 8 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 1 .5 cm
BSPG AS Vili 83 - Oppel (1862), PI. 8 (fig. 2)
- incomplete specimen
Description. Small-sized erymid with strongly spiny
and tuberculate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Dorsal margin dentate. Rostrum short with three supralat¬
eral teeth. Cervical and branchiocardiac grooves deep.
Gastro-orbital, postcervical, and ventral grooves weak.
Antennal groove deep. Hepatic notch and muscle adduc¬
tor testis weak. Antennal spine well developed. Ocular
incision large and deep. Spines short and strong located
in gastric, antennal, and in thè upper part of branchial
regions. Spines arranged in two rows in thè gastric region,
increasing in size toward thè ocular incision. Tubercles in
thè pterygostomial and in thè median and lower parts of
branchial regions.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI subrectangular of equal
length and with smooth tergal surface. Telson subtrian-
gular with pointed distai extremity, deep median longi-
tudinal groove, marked by two parallel rows of small
spines, two oblique weak carinae and three strong spines,
increasing in size from thè proximal to thè distai one, in
thè median part of lateral margins. Protopod subrectangu¬
lar. Uropodal endopod with a strong median longitudinal
carina. Uropodal exopod with a strong median longitu¬
dinal carina, two distai spines on thè outer margin (one
longer and one shorter), rounded diaeresis with serrate
upper margin having one longer median spine and tuber¬
culate lower margin.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped
elongate with first proximal article having two strong
distai spines and second article with one strong distai
spine, all located on thè lower margin. Antennular arti-
cles thin of which thè distai one carries two elongate
multiarticulate flagella of equal length. Antennal articles
strong and stout of which thè distai one carries a strong
elongate multiarticulate flagellum, twice thè body length.
Scaphocerite elongate and triangular with serrate lower
margin and with basicerite having a strong distai spine.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with short and stout
chela. Movable and fixed fingers of equal length with
curved distai extremity. Fixed fìnger with strongly dentate
inner margin. Inner margin of movable finger edentate.
Upper margin of merus with a row of strong spines,
increasing in length toward thè articolation with carpus.
Lower margin of merus with a row of strong spines of
equal length. Upper margin of carpus, propodus and mov¬
able finger with a row of strong spines of equal length.
Lower margin of carpus, propodus and fixed fìnger with
a row of small spines of equal length. Surface of merus,
carpus, propodus and movable finger covered with tuber¬
cles and strong spines arranged in parallel rows. Chela of
pereiopod III longer than chela of pereiopod II. Chelae
of pereiopods II-III with a strong spine in thè articulation
between movable and fixed fingers. Pereiopods IV longer
and stronger than pereiopod V, both achelate. Lower
margin of propodus of pereiopod IV with a row of down-
curved spines.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
11
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu-
late flagella.
Discussion. Forster (1966) reviewed this genus,
describing seven species. Today, Palaeastacus Bell,
1850, known from thè Lower Jurassic (Sinemurian) to
thè Paleocene of Europe (France, Switzerland, Germany
and England), Antarctic Peninsula, United States, and
Australia, includes 18 species. Eight from thè Jurassic:
P. falsarli (Dumortier, 1867) (France - Sinemurian), P.
argoviensis Forster & Rieber, 1982 (Switzerland - Aale-
nian), P. spinosus (Etallon, 1861) (France - Aalenian),
P edwardsi Etallon, 1861 (France - Callovian), P. fuci-
formis (Schlotheim, 1822) (Germany - Tithonian), P.
rothgaengerae Schweigert & Ròper, 2001 (Germany
- Kimmeridgian), P. poeschli Schweigert & Ròper, 2001
(Germany - Tithonian), and 7? decoratus (Frentzen, 1937)
(Germany - Pliensbachian). Nine from thè Cretaceous: P.
foersteri Taylor, 1979 (Antarctic Peninsula - Aptian), P.
scaber (Bell, 1 863) (England - Albian), P. terraereginae
(Etheridge, 1914) (Australia - Albian), P. sussexiensis
(Mantell, 1833) (England - Cenomanian), P. trìsulcatus
Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2001 (United States - Ceno¬
manian), P triglyptus (Stenzel, 1945) (United States
- Coniacian), P kimzeyì Rathbun, 1935 (United States
- Campanian), P. dixoni Bell (1850) (England - Chalk
Formation), and P. macrodactylus Bell, 1850 (England
- Chalk Formation). One from thè Tertiary: P selmaensis
Rathbun, 1935 (United States - Paleocene).
Genus Pustulina Quenstedt, 1857
Type species: Pustulina suevica Quenstedt, 1857
Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822)
Fig. 8, PI. II (fig. 1), PI. XI (fìg. 6), PI. XII (fìgs. 1, 2)
1822 - Macrourites minutus Schlotheim; p. 28, PI. 3 (fig. 3)
1839 - Glyphea minuta Mtinster; p. 20, PI. 9 (fìgs. 8-10)
1839 - Glyphea verrucosa Miinster; p. 21, PI. 9 (fig. 11) (not fig. 12 =
lectotype of Eryma verrucosa)
1 861 - Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 359
1862 - Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 39, PI. 8 (figs. 6-8)
1904 - Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Enoploclytia minuta (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 284
1 925 - Enoploclytia fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 285 (pars)
1928 - Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Beurlen; p. 164
1929 - Eryma fuciformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 154 (pars)
1929 -Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 156
1961 - Eryma minuta (Schlotheim) in Kuhn; p. 22
1966 - Phlyctisoma minuta (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 142, PI. 1 8 (fig. 9)
1969 - Phlyctisoma minuta (Schlotheim) in Malz; p. 300, Text-fig. 9
not 1994 - Phlyctisoma minuta (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 126,
Fig. 224 = Palaeastacus sp.
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened; ros-
trum short with three small supralateral teeth; gastro-orbital
and cervical grooves deep; postcervical groove strongly
developed reaching hepatic groove; branchiocardiac
groove extremely small; antennal spine well developed;
pereiopods I-III chelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger
than pereiopods II-III; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Holotype: Macrourites minutus (= Pustulina minuta),
MNHB K 41 MB (Schlotheim, 1822 - PI. 3, fig. 3;
length of thè specimen: 2 cm), housed in thè Museum fur
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin.
Our studies revealed that one thè syntypes of Glyphea
verrucosa from Eichstàtt and figured by Mtinster (1839
- PI. 9, fig. 11) belongs to Pustulina minuta, as already
recognized by Oppel (1862)
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Eichstàtt (?).
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 44 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 13 from thè Reden-
bacher collection, one from collection of thè Museum fur
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin and 30
from thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich. We studied of
this originai sample thè holotype by Schlotheim, housed
in thè Museum far Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt
in Berlin, and four specimens, housed in Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich in which we identifìed two specimens, illus-
trated by Miinster (1839) and two specimens, illustrated
by Oppel (1862). One specimen (BSPG AS I 619) was
identifìed as belonging to originai collections thanks to
thè 19th century labels. However, it was impossible to
establish if it was studied by one of thè above-mentioned
authors because it was not illustrated. We report thè list of
thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 180 - Miinster (1839), PI. 9 (fìg. 10)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 181 - Miinster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 11)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VI 10 - Oppel (1862), PI. 8 (fig. 8)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS Vili 78 - Oppel (1862), PI. 8 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
Oppel (1862) reported one specimen, an isolated
pereiopod I, which he kept in Eryma verrucosa (Miinster,
1839), hence taking that specimen as thè lectotype of this
taxon. It was housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich where, today,
it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS VII 182 -Miinster (1839), PI. 9 (fìg. 12)
BSPG AS VII 1 82 - Oppel ( 1 862), PI. 8 (fig. 5)
- incomplete specimen
One specimen (n. cat. 0314 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè tail fan of this species, poorly pre¬
served in thè originai sample.
Description. Small-sized erymid with densely tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened. Ros-
trum short with three small supralateral teeth. Cervical and
gastro-orbital grooves deep. Postcervical groove strongly
developed reaching hepatic groove. Branchiocardiac
groove extremely small. Antennal, hepatic, and ventral
grooves weak. Antennal spine well developed. Ocular inci-
sion small. Dorsal surface of carapace densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal length
and with finely tuberculate tergal surface. Somite VI
subsquare. Telson subtriangular with weak median lon-
gitudinal groove, two pairs of small tubercles in proximal
part of dorsal surface, one pair of small distai spine on
lateral margin, and rounded distai extremity. Protopod
subrectangular. Uropodal endopod with strong longitudi-
12
ALESSANDRO GARASSfNO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
nal median carina. Uropodal exopod with a weak longi-
tudinal median carina, two different distai spines on thè
outer margin (one longer and one shorter) and rounded
diaeresis with serrate upper margin.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped
elongate with thè first article having a strong distai spine
in thè lower margin. Antennular articles thin of which thè
distai one carries two elongate multiarticulate flagella of
equal length. Antennal articles strong and stout of which
thè distai one carries a strong elongate multiarticulate
flagellum, twice thè body length.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with very short
and stout chela. Movable finger longer than fixed fìnger
with curved distai extremity. Inner margins of movable
and fixed fingers edentate. Surface of merus, carpus,
propodus, movable, and fixed fingers covered with strong
tubercles. Chelae of pereiopods II-III of equal length.
Pereiopods IV-V achelate. Lower margin of propodus of
pereiopod IV with a row of downcurved spines.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Phlyctisoma Bell, 1863, now synonym
of Pustulina Quenstedt, 1857, after thè review by Sch-
weigert et al. (2000), was studied by Forster (1966) who
described seven species. Today, Pustulina , known from
thè Lower Jurassic (Sinemurian) to thè Upper Cretaceous
(Campanian - Maastrichtian) of Europe (Germany, Eng-
land, France and Italy), Madagascar and Canada, includes
12 species. Seven from thè Jurassic: P. sinemuriana (Gar-
assino, 1996) (Italy - Sinemurian), P. elegans (Méchin,
1901) (France - Bajocian), P. calloviensis (Forster,
1966) (Germany - Callovian), P. perroni (Etallon, 1861)
(France - Oxfordian), P pseudobabeaui (Dollfus, 1863)
(France - Kimmeridgian), P. suevica Quenstedt, 1857
(Germany - Kimmeridgian), and P. minuta (Schlotheim,
1822) (Germany - Tithonian). Five from thè Cretaceous:
P. spinulata (Secretan, 1964) (Madagascar - Valangin-
ian-Hauterivian), P. tuberculata (Bell, 1863) (England
- Albian), P. granulata (Bell, 1863) (England - Albian),
P. scabra (Bell, 1863) (England - Albian), and P. dawsoni
(Woodward, 1900) (Canada - Upper Cretaceous).
Miinster (1839) described Glyphea verrucosa on one
poorly preserved specimen (fìgured in PI. 9, fig. 11) and
one isolated complete chela. Only thè latter was kept
in this species by Oppel (1862), so that this chela has
become thè lectotype of Glyphea verrucosa Miinster,
1839. Forster (1966) discussed thè systematic position of
E. verrucosa (Miinster, 1839), rejecting thè ascription of
this species to Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822), for
thè different omamentation of thè chela. Moreover, thè
author, comparing E. verrucosa with E. boloniensis Sau-
vage, 1891 (France - Kimmeridgian) and E. mosquensìs
Lahusen, 1 894 (Russia - Portlandian), both preserved as
incomplete chelae, pointed out thè existence of a mor-
phological affinity between thè propodus of thè German
species and thè other two. However, thè latter view was
based on a large chela in thè collection of thè Naturkun-
demuseum in Dresden which Forster (1966) assigned to
thè same species. The latter, unfigured specimen of which
a plaster cast exists in thè Munich collection, clearly
belongs to Erymastacus sp. in respect of its very large
fingers showing occludent margins with well-developed,
regularily spaced teeth. The lectotype of Glyphea ver¬
rucosa Miinster, 1839, differs from Pustulina minuta by
thè presence of a densely pustulate omamentation of thè
propodus and its more straight fingers. To date no other
specimen of this rare taxon could be identified in collec-
tions, so that thè generic assignment is uncertain.
Family Protastacidae Albrecht, 1983
Genus Pseudastacus Oppel, 1861
Type species: Bolina pustulosa Miinster, 1839
Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster, 1839) (c^)
Fig. 8, PI. II (fig. 2), PI. XII (figs. 3, 4)
1839 - Bolina pustulosa Miinster; p. 23, PI. 9 (fig. 13)
1840 - Alvis octopus Miinster; p. 20, PI. 1 (fig. 1)
1861 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 360
1861 - Pseudastacus Miinsteri Oppel; p. 360, nov. syn. ($)
1 862 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 44, PI. 10 (figs.
4-5), PI. 11 (fig. 1)
1 862 - Pseudastacus Miinsteri Oppel; p. 45, PI. 1 1 (fig. 2)
1904 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Walther; p. 174
1904 - Pseudastacus Miinsteri Oppel in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 292,
Text-fig. 133
1 929 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 35 1
1 969 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Glaessner; R 460, Text-
fig. 267/1
1994 - Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 26, Fig.
225
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
cervical, gastro-orbital, antennal, and hepatic grooves
deep; postcervical groove weak; branchiocardiac groove
absent; dorsal suture absent; rostrum long with three
strong supralateral teeth; antennal spine weak; pereiopods
I-III chelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereio¬
pods II-III; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS I 670 (Oppel, 1 862 - PI. 1 0, fig.
4), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Our studies revealed that Pseudastacus muensteri from
Solnhofen and fìgured by Oppel ( 1 862 - PI. 11, fig. 2 a-b)
is synonym with Pseudastacus pustulosus , as discussed
below. This specimen, BSPG AS I 672, is thè holotype
of Oppel ’s species, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung ftir Palaontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported ten specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: one from thè Reden-
bacher collection and nine from thè collection of thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palaontologie und Geologie
in Munich. We studied of this originai sample four speci¬
mens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Pala-
ontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we identified
one specimen, illustrated by Miinster (1839) and three
specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). Seven specimens
were identified as belonging to originai collections thanks
to thè 19^ century labels; two to Miinster collection, four
to Oppel collection and one unidentified. Finally, thè
specimen BSPG AS VII 323, belonging to Miinster ’s col¬
lection was not illustrated by thè author. We report thè list
of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
13
BSPG AS VII 321 - Miinster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 13)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS I 669 - Oppel (1862), PI. 10 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS I 670 - Oppel (1862), PI. 10 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS I 671 - Oppel (1862), PI. 11 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
Oppel (1862) reported one specimen which he
assigned to Pseudastacus muensteri Oppel, 1862, housed
in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS I 672 - Oppel (1862), PI. 11 (fig. 2 a-b)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
One well-preserved specimen (n. cat. SMNS 65480
- Koschny collection) was used to describe some mor¬
phological characters of thè carapace, poorly preserved in
thè originai specimens.
Description. Median-sized protoastacid with strongly
tuberculate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Dorsal margin straight. Dorsal suture absent. Rostrum
long with three strong supralateral teeth. Cervical, gastro-
orbital, antennal, and hepatic grooves deep. Postcervical
groove weak. Branchiocardiac groove absent. Antennal
spine weak. Ocular incision large and deep.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI subrectangular of equal
length with slightly tuberculate tergal surface. Telson
subrectangular with rounded distai extremity and one
strong distai spine on thè lateral margin. A kind of trans¬
verse fold breaks telson into two almost identical parts:
rigid and tuberculate upper part and flexible lower part.
Protopod subrectangular. Uropodal endopod with a
strong longitudinal median carina. Uropodal exopod with
a strong longitudinal median carina, strong distai spine
on thè outer margin, and rounded diaeresis with serrate
upper margin.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped
elongate and spineless. Antennular articles thin of which
thè distai one carries two elongate multiarticulate flagella
of equal length. Antennal articles strong and elongate of
which thè distai one carries a strong elongate multiarticu¬
late flagellum, twice thè body length. Scaphocerite strong,
elongate, and triangular with pointed distai extremity.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with short and stout
chela. Movable and fixed fingers of equal length with
curved distai extremity. Serrate inner margins of movable
and fixed fingers. Lower margin of propodus with a row
of small spines. Dorsal surface of merus with a longitu¬
dinal median row of strong tubercles. Lower margins of
carpus and merus with small spines. Strong median spine
on articulate margins of merus and carpus. Surface of
merus, carpus, propodus, and movable finger covered
with small tubercles. Chela of pereiopod II smaller than
chela of pereiopod III. Pereiopods IV-V achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu¬
late flagella.
Discussion. Pseudastacus Oppel, 1861, was included
for long time in thè family Nephropidae Dana, 1852,
as reported by Glaessner (1969) and Chong & Forster
(1976). Albrecht (1983) reviewed this genus, includ-
ing it in thè new family Protastacidae Albrecht, 1983
(infraorder Astacidea Latreille, 1802). The author justi-
fied thè institution of this family because it represents a
transitional grade between thè erymids and crayfishes.
Tshudy & Babcock (1997) included Pseudastacus in their
newly erected family Chilenophoberidae, but their analy-
sis is not founded by a morphological review of thè type
material but only by line drawings in literature.
Today, thè family Protastacidae includes two genera:
Pseudastacus Oppel, 1861, with two species, P. pustulo-
sus Miinster, 1839, and P. minor Fraas, 1878 (Germany
- Tithonian), and Protoastacus Albrecht, 1983, with P.
politus (Schliiter, 1 868) (Germany - Upper Cretaceous).
The holotype of P. dubertreti Roger, 1946 (n. cat. B.
18892) (Lebanon - Cenomanian) housed in thè Muséum
national d’Histoire naturelle in Paris, was recently exam-
ined by one of thè authors (A. Garassino). Its study has
pointed out that thè elongate rostrum with a row of dorsal
teeth and thè annulated carpus of pereiopods II-III are two
characters typical of Carpopenaeus callirostris Glaessner,
1945. So P dubertreti must be considered as synonym
with C. callirostris.
Oppel (1862), describing P muensteri, pointed out
that thè small size of thè body and thè longer and sten¬
der pereiopod I distinguished this new species from P.
pustulosus (Miinster, 1839). Apart from this very sig-
nificant character, thè specimen belonging to P. muensteri
exhibits thè same morphological characters of thè type
species, such as deep cervical, gastro-orbital, antennal
and hepatic grooves, weak postcervical groove, branchio¬
cardiac groove absent, dorsal suture absent, long rostrum
with three strong supralateral teeth, weak antennal spine
and uropodal exopod with diaeresis. After these remark-
able characters in common between P pustulosus and
P muensteri, we suppose these forms represent sexual
dimorphs of a single species. In fact, in Recent glypheid
Neoglyphea inopinata, and other fossil glypheids, another
group of decapods, thè sexual dimorphism also affects
thè lengths of pereiopod I and its articles, with thè longer
ones are developed in thè female (Forest & de Saint Lau¬
rent, 1981, 1989). Thus we suppose P. pustulosus is thè
male and P muensteri thè female form (see also thè sexual
dimorphs in Cycleryon Glaessner, 1965, and Mecochirus
Germar, 1827, in this paper).
Family Stenochiridae Beurlen, 1930
Discussion. Beurlen (1930) established thè family
Stenochiridae that includes Stenochirus Oppel, 1861,
without defining its diagnostic characters. The author in
fact based this species mainly on thè characters of thè
monotypic Stenochirus suevicus Quenstedt, 1867 (Ger¬
many - Aalenian), despite S. angustus Miinster, 1839, thè
type species of thè genus. Stenochirus suevicus became
later type species of thè genus Palaeophoberus Glaessner,
1932. By thè study of two very well preserved specimens
(n. cat. 9706, 9836 - Wulf collection), it was possible to
frame for thè first time thè diagnosis of this family. Thus
we do not follow thè ascription of Stenochirus in Chileno¬
phoberidae by Tshudy & Babcock (1997).
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
rostrum long with four supralateral teeth; two dentate car-
inae in antennal region; cervical groove deep; branchio¬
cardiac groove weak ; pereiopods l-III chelate; pereiopod
14
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
I larger and stronger than pereiopods II-III; pereiopods II-
V weak with slender and elongate segments; pereiopods
II-III weak hearing very small chelae; somite I remark-
ably smaller than thè others; expanded pleura of somite
II not overlapping that of somite I; uropodal exopod with
diaeresis.
Genus Stenochirus Oppel, 1861
Type species: Bolina angusta Miinster, 1839
Solnhofen species: Stenochirus angustus (Miinster,
1839); Stenochirus mayeri Oppel, 1862
Stenochirus angustus (Miinster, 1839)
Fig. 8, PI. Ili (fig. 1), PI. XII (figs. 5, 6)
1839 - Bolina angusta Miinster; p. 24, PI. 9 (fig. 14)
1853 - Bolina angusta Miinster in Frischmann; p. 26
1862 - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 20, PI. 4 (figs.
3-4)
1904 - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 131
1929 - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 380
1994 - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 127, Fig.
226
1999 - Stenochirus angustus (Munster) in Frickhinger; p. 44, Fig. 71
2005b - Stenochirus angustus (Miinster) in Schweigert & Garassino;
p. 498
The poor state of preservation of thè originai specimen
by Oppel has led to thè examination of new specimens
from private collections in order to expand thè morpho-
logical description of Stenochirus angustus. Two speci¬
mens (n. cat. 9706, 9836 - Wulf collection), preserved
in lateral and dorsal views allowed recognition of many
important morphological characters in order to give for
thè first time a detailed description of this species and thè
systematic position of thè genus into thè family Astacidae
Latreille, 1802.
Diagnosis: as for thè genus.
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS VII 322 (Munster,
1839 - PI. 9, fig. 14), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa-
mmlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Flonheim near Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen, thè
holotype of Munster, ascribed to this species, and housed
in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich where today it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS VII 322 - Munster (1839), PI. 9 (fig. 14)
BSPG AS VII 322 - Oppel (1862), PI. 4 (figs. 3-4)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
Description. Median-sized astacid with smooth
exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Rostrum long with four small supralateral teeth directed
forward. Cervical groove median and deep. Branchiocar-
diac groove weak. Two dentate carinae in antennal region.
Posterior margin slightly convex. Ocular incision small,
and narrow. Dorsal surface of carapace smooth.
Abdomen. Somite I remarkably smaller than thè
others. Somites II-VI subrectangular of equal length,
rounded pleurae, and with smooth tergal surface. Pleura
of somite II subrounded overlapping that of somite III.
Telson subrectangular with a weak median longitudinal
groove, two pairs of small median longitudinal spines on
dorsal surface, and two oblique carinae originating in thè
proximal part of dorsal surface terminating with a small
distai spine on thè lateral margin. Protopod subrectangu¬
lar. Uropodal endopod with a weak longitudinal median
carina. Uropodal exopod with a weak longitudinal median
carina, one small distai spine on thè outer margin, and
rounded diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. Antennular
articles thin of which thè distai one carries two elon¬
gate multiarticulate flagella of equal length. Antennal
articles strong and stout of which thè distai one carries
a strong elongate multiarticulate flagellum of thè same
body length. Scaphocerite triangular with pointed distai
extremity.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with very elongate
and slender chela. Movable and fixed fìngers of thè same
length with curved distai extremity. Inner margins of
movable and fixed fingers with row of thin and elongate
teeth of thè same length directed forward. Upper margin
of merus with a row of small tubercles. Dorsal surface of
propodus with a strong median longitudinal carina. Upper
and lower margins of merus and carpus of pereiopod I
with a row of strong spines directed forward. Pereiopods
II-V weak hearing elongate and slender articles. Pereio¬
pods II-III with remarkably very small chelae. Pereiopods
IV- V achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. The systematic position of Stenochirus
Oppel, 1861, was uncertain for a long time. Beurlen
(1928, 1930) established thè subfamily Stenochirinae
originally and thè family Stenochiridae later, justifying
it on thè basis of morphological characters that were
different from thè other astacideans. Glaessner (1929,
1969) included Stenochirus in thè family Erymidae Van
Straelen, 1924, originally and later he did not include this
genus in any known family of thè infraorder Astacidea
Latreille, 1803.
The study of thè originai and new specimens permit-
ted recognition of some morphological characters, such
as weak pereiopods II-V hearing slender and elongate
articles, pereiopods II-III with remarkably small chelae,
somite I remarkably smaller than thè others, and sub¬
rounded pleura of somite II overlapping that of somite
III, that are typical of Stenochirus and are not observ-
able in thè other genera within thè infraorder Astacidea
in order to attest thè originai institution of thè family by
Beurlen.
Moreover, among thè genera belonging to thè
infraorder Astacidea, thè above-mentioned characters are
also observable in Uncina Quenstedt, 1851 (family Unci-
nidae Beurlen, 1928) recently reviewed by Schweigert et
al. (2003), even though this genus differs from Stenochi¬
rus on thè basis of thè different shape and morphology of
thè chela of pereiopod I.
Today, thè family Stenochiridae Beurlen, 1930, previ-
ously known only in thè Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) of
Germany, includes three species, S. angustus Munster,
1839, S. mayeri Oppel, 1862, and S. vahldieki Sch¬
weigert, Garassino & Riou, 2006, from thè Callovian of
France (Schweigert et al., 2006).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART
15
Stenochirus mayeri Oppel, 1 862
Fig. 2, PI. XIII (figs. 1,2)
1862 - Stenochirus Mayeri Oppel; p. 20, PI. 4 (figs. 1-2)
1904 - Stenochirus Meyeri Oppel in Walther; p. 175
1925 - Stenochirus Meyeri Oppel in Van Straelen; p. 131
1929 - Stenochirus Meyeri Oppel in Glaessner; p. 380
1969 - Stenochirus meyeri Oppel in Glaessner; R 460, Text-fig. 267/2
1994 - Stenochirus meyeri Oppel in Frickhinger; p. 127, Fig. 227
Lectotype: BSPG AS I 673 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 4, figs.
1-2), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur Pala-
ontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range; Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Remark: The correct originai spelling of this taxon is
“mayeri". An according to thè originai hand-written label
by Oppel this species was dedicated to Charles Mayer-
Eymar, not to Hermann v. Meyer.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen,
ascribed to this species, and housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS I 673 - Oppel (1862), PI. 4 (figs. 1-2)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
Discussion. This species was described by Oppel
(1862) on one specimen in ventral view. Even though,
thè poor state of preservation of thè originai specimen
made difficult to observe thè morphological characters
of Stenochirus Oppel, 1861, pereiopod II with remark-
ably small chela, pleura of somite II overlapping that
Fig. 2 - Stenochirus mayeri Oppel, 1862, chela of pereiopod I, line
drawing (F. Fogliazza).
of somite III, and uropodal exopod with small spine in
thè distai part of lateral margin are enough to validate
its ascription to this genus. However, it is difficult to
develop a morphological description of this species
because it is preserved in ventral view. We agree with
Oppel in regard to its systematic validity because thè
shape of thè chela of pereiopod I is different from that of
S. angustus Miinster, 1839 (Fig. 2). In fact, Oppel’s spe¬
cies exhibits a slender, slightly curved propodus of thè
chela of pereiopod I with thè movable finger longer than
fixed fìnger. Miinster’s species has a stout and straight
propodus of chela of pereiopod I with movable and fixed
fìngers of thè same length. In both species, thè inner
margins of movable and fixed fìngers have a row of thin
and elongate teeth of thè same length directed forward.
Only thè discovery of well preserved specimens will
make possible a complete morphological description of
this species.
Family Glypheidae Winckler, 1883
Genus Glyphea v. Meyer, 1835
Type species: Palinurus regleyanus Desmarest, 1822
Solnhofen species: Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlot-
heim, 1822); Glyphea tenuis Oppel, 1860
Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822)
Fig. 9, PI. Ili (fig. 2), PI. XIII (fig. 3)
1822 - Macrourites pseudoscyllarus Schlotheim; p. 36, PI. 12 (fig.
5)
1829 - Scyllarus dubius Holl; p. 151
1839 - Orphnea pseduoscyllarus Miinster; p. 39, PI. 14 (figs. 1-2)
1839 - Orphnea striata Miinster; p. 40, PI. 14 (fig. 3)
1839 - Orphnea laevigata Miinster; p. 41, PI. 14 (fig. 5)
1839 - Orphnea pygmaea Miinster; p. 42, PI. 14 (fig. 6)
1839 - Brisa dubia Miinster; p. 46, PI. 15 (figs. 4-5?)
1839 - Brisa lucida Miinster; p. 46, PI. 15 (fig. 3)
1853 - Orphnea pseudoscyllarus Miinster in Frischmann; p. 29
1853 - Orphnea striata Miinster in Frischmann; p. 29
1860 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 1 10
1862 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 72, PI. 18
(fig. 2), PI. 19 (figs. 1-5)
1883 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Winckler; p. 26, Figs.
4,6
1904 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 174
1922 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p.
1224-1226
1925 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 192,
Text-fig. 94
1928 — Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Beurlen; p. 140
1929 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 189
1969 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; R 463
not 1994 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p.
120, Fig. 207 = G. tenuis
2001 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Dietl & Schweigert;
p. 55, Text-fig. 90
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
rostrum very short with curved distai extremity; cervical
and branchiocardiac grooves deep; postcervical groove
weak, joined to branchiocardiac groove near their lower
16
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
ends; antennal, hepatic, and ventral grooves weak; three/
four carinae tuberculate extend parallel in gastric and
antennal regions; pereiopod I subchelate; pereiopods II-V
achelate; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Holotype: Macrourites pseudoscyllarus (= Glyphea
pseudoscyllarus), MNHB K 43 MB. A. 255 (Schlotheim,
1822 - PI. 12, fig. 5; length of thè specimen: 5 cm),
housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-
Universitàt in Berlin.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kimmer-
digian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 50 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 16 from thè
Redenbacher collection and 34 from thè collection
of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie
und Geologie in Munich. We studied thè holotype by
Schlotheim, housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der
Humboldt-Universitat in Berlin, and nine specimens of
this originai sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung fur Palaontologie und Geologie in Munich
in which we identified one specimen, illustrated by
Munster (1839) and Oppel (1862) and seven specimens,
illustrated by Oppel (1862). Six specimens without
catalogue numbers were identified as belonging to
originai collections based upon thè 19th century labels.
We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by Munster
and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 730 - Munster (1839), PI. 14 (fig. 2)
BSPG AS VII 730 - Oppel (1862), PI. 19 (fig. 2)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS I 974 - Oppel (1862), PI. 19 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS I 976 - Oppel (1862), PI. 19 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 1429 - Oppel (1862), PI. 19 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
BSPG AS I 975 - Oppel (1862), PI. 19 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 2.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 732 - Oppel (1862), PI. 14 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 733 - Oppel (1862), PI. 14 (fig. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 1 cm
BSPG AS VII 731 - Oppel (1862), PI. 14 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 4.5 cm
Description. Median-sized glypheid with strongly
tuberculate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened and
strongly tuberculate. Rostrum very short and edentate
with curved distai extremity. Cervical and branchiocar-
diac grooves deep. Postcervical groove weak, joined to
branchiocardiac groove near their lower ends. Antennal,
hepatic, and ventral grooves weak. Antennal spine well
developed. Three/four longitudinal carinae strongly
tuberculate extend parallel in gastric and antennal
regions. Ocular incision narrow with weakly developed
antennal and ptergostomial angles.
Abdomen. Somite I-V subrectangular of equal
h ngth and with tuberculate tergal surface. Somites I-V
w ith subtriangular pleurae. Telson subrectangular with
rounded distai extremity and three tuberculate carinae
extending its total length. Protopod subrectangular.
Uropodal endopod smooth. Uropodal exopod with weak
median longitudinal groove, marked by two rows of
spines, two different distai spines on thè outer margin
(one longer and one shorter), outer margin with small
tubercules, and rounded diaeresis with upper serrate
margin.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk very elongate and
strong. 3rd maxilliped very elongate with first article
having a strong distai spine on thè outer margin and
second article with two strong distai spines on thè
outer margin respectively. Antennular articles thin
and elongate of which thè distai one carries two multi-
articulate flagella of equal length. lst and 3rd antennal
articles short, 2nd antennal article very elongate with
dorsal surface covered with rows of strong parallel
spines. Multiarticulate flagellum elongate, twice thè
body length. Scaphocerite triangular with pointed distai
extremity and lower margin with a row of thin and elon¬
gate spines.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I subchelate with
strong, elongate subrectangular merus and propodus
and short subtriangular carpus. Movable finger thin
and elongate with tuberculate dorsal surface and ser¬
rate upper and lower margins. Lower margin of pro¬
podus with strong spines of equal length in proximal
and mediai parts; distai part with two spines, first
stronger and more elongate than second. Dorsal surface
of merus, carpus, and propodus covered with strong
spines, locateci along margins in merus, and in parallel
rows in carpus and propodus. Pereiopods II-V achelate.
Lower margin of merus and carpus of pereiopods II-IV
with short spines.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu¬
late flagella.
Discussion. Feldmann & de Saint Laurent (2002)
gave a check list of 29 species included in Glyphea
v. Meyer, 1835. Among these species, G. squamosa
(Munster, 1839), is now considered thè type species of
Squamosoglyphea Beurlen, 1930 (see thè description
and discussion in Schweigert & Garassino, 2005, and
below). Moreover, thè authors did not consider seven
species, described by Damborenea & Mancenido (1987),
Garassino (1996, 1997, 2000, 2001), Polz (2000), and
Schweitzer & Feldmann (2001): G. eureka Damborenea
& Mancenido, 1987, G. tricarinata Garassino, 1996, G.
tonelloi Garassino, 1997, G. rigoi Garassino, 2000, G.
viohli Polz, 2000, G. damesi Garassino, 2001, and G.
michelae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2001.
As reported by Glaessner (1929), Glyphea may include
more species. However, since this genus has never been
reviewed, probably many species could be synonym for
some morphological characters, such as thè path of thè
grooves, thè number of carinae in gastric and antennal
regions and thè structure of pereiopod I. Unfortunately,
this review is made difficult for thè problems of finding
thè originai samples and for thè loss of many originai
specimens.
On thè basis of this reflection, we consider Feld¬
mann & de Saint Laurent’s paper as thè most updated
paper known to date. So today, Glyphea includes 36
species from thè Upper Triassic (Norian) to Eocene
(Bartonian) of Europe (Germany, France, England,
Poland, ltaly and Spain), Lebanon, East Africa, North
and South America, New Zealand, Australia, and Ant-
arctic Peninsula.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
17
Glyphea tenuis Oppel, 1861
Fig. 9, PI. IV (fig. 1), PI. XIII (fig. 4)
1861 - Glyphea tenuis Oppel; p. 110
1 862 - Glyphea tenuis Oppel; p. 76, PI. 20 (figs. 2-3)
1883 - Glyphea tenuis Oppel in Winckler; p. 27, Fig. 5
1904 - Glyphea tenuis Oppel in Walther; p. 174
1994 - Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 120,
Fig. 207
1994 - Glyphea tenuis Oppel in Frickhinger; p. 120, Fig. 208
2005b - Glyphea tenuis Oppel in Schweigert & Garassino; p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
rostrum short and edentate with curved distai extremity;
cervical and branchiocardiac grooves deep; postcervi-
cal groove weak; antennal, hepatic, and ventral grooves
weak; one/two longitudinal carinae weak extend parallel
in gastric and antennal regions; pereiopod I subchelate;
pereiopods II-V achelate; uropodal exopod with diaer-
esis.
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS Vili 95 (Oppel,
1862 - PI. 20, figs. 2-3) housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fiir Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Eichstàtt.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen,
ascribed to this species, and housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fiir Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS Vili 95 - Oppel (1862), PI. 20 (figs. 2-3)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
One specimen (n. cat. 9911 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè tail fan, poorly preserved in thè origi¬
nai specimen.
Description. Median-sized glypheid with finely tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened
and finely tuberculate. Rostrum short and edentate with
curved distai extremity. Cervical and branchiocardiac
grooves deep. Postcervical groove weak. Antennal,
hepatic, and ventral grooves weak. One/two longitudinal
carinae extend parallel in gastric and antennal regions.
Ocular incision narrow with weakly developed antenna!
and ptergostomial angles.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal
length and with smooth tergal surface. Pleurae of
somites I-V ending with a point in thè median part.
Telson subrectangular with rounded distai extremity.
Protopod subrectangular. Uropodal endopod with weak
longitudinal carina. Uropodal exopod with weak longi¬
tudinal carina, strong distai spine in thè outer margin,
and rounded diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk elongate and strong.
3rd maxilliped not preserved. Antennular articles thin
and elongate of which thè distai one carries two multi-
articulate flagella of equal length. lst and 3rd antennal
articles short and 2nd antennal article very elongate.
Multiarticulate flagellum elongate, twice thè body
length. Scaphocerite triangular with pointed distai
extremity.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I subchelate with
short subrectangular merus and propodus and short sub-
triangular carpus. Movable fìnger thin and elongate with
smooth dorsal surface. Lower margin of propodus with
two/three strong spines of equal length distally. Dorsal
surface of merus, carpus, and propodus tuberculate.
Pereiopods II-V achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Oppel (1862) pointed out thè main
morphological differences of this species respect to G.
pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822) in order to justify
its institution: smooth exoskeleton, shorter antennal
articles and shorter eyestalk. The study of thè originai
specimen confirmed thè systematic validity of G. tenuis
Oppel, 1860: postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves
extend parallel without joining near their lower ends,
as in G. pseudoscyllarus ; one/two weak longitudinal
carinae in gastric and antennal regions unlike G. pseu¬
doscyllarus in which three/four tuberculate carinae are
present in these regions; different shape of pereiopod
I with shorter merus and propodus and dorsal surface
of carpus and propodus without strong spines arranged
in parallel rows, as in G. pseudoscyllarus ; merus and
carpus of pereiopods II-IV without spines along thè
outer margins, well developed instead in G. pseudoscyl¬
larus.
Genus Squamosoglyphea Beurlen, 1930
Type species: Glyphea dressieri v. Meyer, 1840 (for
correct spelling of this taxon see Schweigert & Garassino,
2005a)
Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Mtinster, 1839)
Fig. 9, PI. IV (fig. 2), PI. XIII (fig. 5)
1839 - Orphnea squamosa Mtinster; p. 41, PI. 14 (fig. 4)
1 853 - Orphnea squamosa Mtinster in Frischmann; p. 29
1 854 - Orphnea squamosa Mtinster in Pictet; p. 449, PI. 42 (fig. 9)
1861 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Oppel; p. 110
1862 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Oppel; p. 75, PI. 20 (fig. 1)
1904 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Van Straelen; p. 189
1928 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Beurlen; p. 136
1929 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Glaessner; p. 191
1961 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Martin; p. 70
1973 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Forster; p. 34
2001 - Glyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Schweitzer & Feldmann; p.
177
2005a - Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Mtinster) in Schweigert & Ga¬
rassino; p. 274, Figs. 1-2
The poor state of preservation of thè only originai
specimen, ascribed to this species, makes it difficult to
extend its morphological description over thè originai one
by Mtinster.
The possibility to clean thè tail fan allowed description
of it for thè first time. Some more details became obvious
from a topotype.
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened
having wide superimposed scales; rostrum short and
edentate; cervical, postcervical, and branchiocardiac
grooves weak; pereiopod 1 subchelate with propodus
longer than wide, spineless on thè lower margin; uropodal
exopod with diaeresis.
18
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS VII 734 (Miinster,
1839 - PI. 14, fig. 4), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa-
mmlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian).
Type locality: Kelheim (after lithology; originally
labelled “Solnhofen”).
Material: Oppel (1862) reported two specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: one from thè Reden-
bacher collection and one (thè originai of Miinster) from
thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palà¬
ontologie und Geologie in Munich. We studied thè holo¬
type by Miinster, illustrated by Miinster (1839) and Oppel
(1862), and thè other specimen from thè Redenbacher
collection in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-
Universitàt in Berlin.
BSPG AS VII 734 - Miinster (1839), PI. 14 (fìg. 4)
BSPG AS VII 734 - Oppel (1862), PI. 20 (fìg. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
MNHB MB. A. 1 1 06 - Oppel ( 1 862), p. 75, not figured
- length of thè specimen: 4.2 cm
Description. Small-sized glypheid with exoskeleton
characterized by imbricated scales. The holotype is dor-
sally embedded, whereas thè second specimen is embed-
ded in oblique view.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened
having wide superimposed scales in cardiac and branchial
regions reducing in size toward gastric and antennal
regions. Rostrum short and edentate. Cervical, postcervi-
cal, and branchiocardiac grooves weak. Ocular incision
narrow with weakly developed antennal and ptergosto-
mial angles. Posterior margin sinuous with a thin mar¬
ginai carina.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal
length and with smooth tergal surface. Pleurae of
somites I-V ending with a point in thè median part.
Somite VI subrectangular longer than thè previous
ones. Telson subrectangular with rounded distai extrem-
ity. Dorsal surface of telson with a pair of narrow and
raised carinae originating in proximal part of lateral
margins and converging in thè middle without joining.
Rounded basai tubercle in thè middle between thè two
carinae. A pair of grooves narrow and weak arise from
thè distai end of thè carinae diverging toward thè distai
extremity. Protopod subrectangular. Uropodal endopod
with weak longitudinal groove marked with two rows of
rounded tubercles. Uropodal exopod with deep longitu¬
dinal groove marked with two rows of rounded tuber¬
cles, strong spine in thè distai part of outer margin, and
subrounded diaeresis. In thè ventral part of thè tergum
ol thè somites, forming forwardly directed lobes are
developed, located just above thè pleurae, like in thè
reconstruction of S. udressieri by Oppel (1862 - PI
16, fìg. 7).
Cephalic appendages. Merocerite of antennae strongly
elongate with tour thin and elongate spines along lower
margin. Carpocerite of antennae short with elongate
multiarticulate lìagellum (total length unknown). Anten¬
nule poorly preserved, both flagella of different length
(ca. 5 mm vs. 6 mm).
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I subchelate with
piopodus longer than wide and spineless lower margin.
Movable finger thin and elongate with a median groove.
Carpus short and subtriangular with spineless lower
margin. Surface of propodus with irregularly arranged
scale-like rounded tubercles with forwardly directing
tips. Surface of carpus with scale-like tubercles exhibiting
multiple forwardly directing tips, especially in thè distai
part. Pereiopods II-V achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Beurlen (1930) based a new subgenus on
thè closely related S. dressieri (v. Meyer, 1840) - for thè
correct spelling of thè latter see Schweigert & Garassino
(2005a). The presence of superimposed scales instead
of tubercles is so different from Glyphea sensu strido
that we give genus rank to this taxon. Besides S. squa¬
mosa, two other species of this genus occur in thè Upper
Jurassic lithographic limestones of S Germany which
were described separately (Schweigert & Garassino,
2005).
Family Mecochiridae Van Straelen, 1924
Genus Mecochirus Germar, 1827
Type species: Macrourites Iongimanatus Schlotheim,
1820
Solnhofen species: Mecochirus Iongimanatus
(Schlotheim, 1820); Mecochirus dubius (Miinster,
1839)
Mecochirus Iongimanatus (Schlotheim, 1820) ($)
Fig. 9, PI. V (fìg. 1), PI. XIII (fìg. 6), PI. XIV (fìg. 1)
1820 - Macrourites Iongimanatus Schlotheim; p. 38
1 822 - Macrourites Iongimanatus Schlotheim; p. 33
1 822 - Macrourites Iongimanatus Schlotheim in Brogniart & Desmar-
est; p. 136, PI. 5 (fig. 10)
1 823 - Macrourites Iongimanatus Schlotheim; p. 56
1 825 - Palaemon Iongimanatus Kriiger; p. 130
1 827 - Mecochirus locusta Germar; p. 102
1827 - Mecochirus Bajeri Germar; p. 103, Text-fig. 5, nov. syn.
1 829 - Palaemon Iongimanatus Kriiger in Holl; p. 152
1837 - Megachirus locusta Bronn; p. 476, PI. 27 (fig. 1)
1837 - Megachirus longimanus Bronn; p. 476, Text-fig. 16a
1839 - Megachirus brevimanus Miinster; p. 34, PI. 13 (figs. 1?, 2, 3),
nov. syn. (c?)
1 839 - Megachirus locusta Bronn in Miinster; p. 3 1 , PI. 1 1 (figs. 1 -5)
1 839 - Megachirus Bajeri (Germar) in Miinster; p. 33, PI. 12 (figs. 1-5),
PI. 13 (figs. 6-7)
1839 - Megachirus fimbriatus Miinster; p. 35
1839 - Megachirus intermedius Miinster; p. 35, PI. 13 (figs. 4?, 5)
1839 - Pterochirus remimanus Bronn in Miinster; p. 27, PI. 16 (figs.
1-2)
1839 - Pterochirus elongatus Miinster; p. 28, PI. 16 (fig. 3)
1839 - Orphnea longimanus Miinster; p. 42, PI. 14 (fig. 7)
1 848 - Megachirus locusta Bronn; p. 708
1850 - Mecochirus locusta Germar in Quenstedt; p. 196, PI. 2 (figs.
1-3)
1853 - Mecochirus locusta Germar in Bronn; p. 418, PI. 27 (fig. 1,
16a)
1862 - Mecochirus longimanus (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 82, PI. 22
(fig. 4), PI. 23 (fig. 1)
1 862 - Mecochirus Bajeri Germar in Oppel; p. 83, PI. 23 (fig. 2)
1862 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 84, PI. 22 (figs.
5-6)
1904 - Mecochirus longimanus (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 174
THE UPPER JURASS1C SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
19
1904 - Mecochirus Bajeri Germar in Walther; p. 174
1904 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 218
1929 - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 250
1929 - Mecochirus Bajeri Germar in Glaessner; p. 249
1929 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 249
1969 - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; R 464,
Text-fig. 270/1
1971 - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 403,
Text-fig. 5
1994 - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 122,
Figs. 214-216
1994 - Mecochirus bajeri Germar in Frickhinger; p. 122, Fig. 212
1994 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 122, Fig. 213
1996 - Mecochirus sp. in Ròper, Rothgaenger & Rothgaenger; p. 72,
Fig. 89
1999 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 43, Fig. 68
2000 - Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster) in Ròper, Rothgaenger &
Rothgaenger; p. 91, Fig. 105
2005b - Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim) in Schweigert & Ga-
rassino; p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
rostrum short and edentate; cervical groove deep in thè
third anterior of carapace; antennal and hepatic grooves
deep; postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves weak
extending parallel; three carinae strong and tuberculate
in thè gastric and antennal regions; extraordinary exten-
sion of pereiopod I subchelate; pereiopod II subchelate;
pereiopods III-V achelate; uropodal exopod with diaer-
esis.
Neotype (originai type series of Schlotheim lost):
Macrourites longimanatus (= Mecochirus longimanatus ),
BSPG AS V 45, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Olir studies revealed that Mecochirus bajeri from
Solnhofen and figured by Germar (1827 - PI. 1, fig. 5)
is synonym with Mecochirus longimanatus , as discussed
below. The monotypic holotype was not traceable in thè
collection of thè Institut fur Geowissenschaften in Halle/
Saale (Germany) (Dr. N. Hauschke, Halle, pers. com.),
and it is probably lost.
Our studies revealed that Megachirus brevimanus
from Eichstàtt and figured by Miinster (1839 - PI. 13,
fig. 2) is synonym with Mecochirus longimanatus , as
discussed below. This specimen, BSPG ASVII 739, is
thè lectotype of Miinster’s species, housed in thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich.
Stratigraphic range; Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Schlotheim (1820) introduced thè name
reported on a sample of three specimens and com-
mented that this species is thè most common one in thè
Solnhofen shales. A neotype was selected because none
of thè specimens of Schlotheim collection was traceable
in thè Museum fur Naturkunde in Humboldt University
in Berlin. Oppel (1862) reported 103 specimens belong-
ing to this species, so divided: 30 from thè Redenbacher
collection and 73 from thè collection of thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich. W e studied of this originai sample six speci¬
mens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we
identified three specimens, illustrated by Miinster (1839)
and three specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). Two
specimens were identified as belonging to Mùnster’s
originai collection thanks to thè 19,h century labels. We
report thè list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and
Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 745 - Miinster (1839), PI. 11 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS VII 746 - Miinster (1839), PI. 11 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 9 cm
BSPG AS VII 748 - Miinster (1839), PI. 16 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
BSPG AS V 45 - Oppel (1862), PI. 22 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 1 0 cm
BSPG AS I 780 - Oppel (1862), PI. 22 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
BSPG AS VI 31 - Oppel (1862), PI. 23 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
Oppel ( 1 862) reported 7 0 specimens which he assigned
to Mecochirus bajeri Germar, 1 827, so divided: 20 from
thè Redenbacher collection and 50 from thè collection of
thè Bayerische Staatssammlung frir Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich. We studied of this originai sample
nine specimens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung tur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich
in which we identified eight specimens, illustrated by
Miinster (1839), and one specimen, illustrated by Oppel
(1862). We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 735 - Miinster (1839), PI. 16 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
BSPG AS VII 736 - Miinster (1839), PI. 16 (fig. 1)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS VII 738 - Miinster (1839), PI. 12 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 7 cm
BSPG AS VII 741 - Miinster (1839), PI. 12 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS VII 742 - Miinster (1839), PI. 12 (fig. 4)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS VII 743 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS VII 744 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS VII 749 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS I 981 - Oppel (1862), PI. 23 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
Oppel (1862) reported 50 specimens which he
assigned to Mecochirus brevimanus (Miinster, 1839)
without pointing out how many specimens belonged to
thè Redenbacher collection and to thè collection of thè
Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geolo¬
gie in Munich. We studied three specimens of this origi¬
nai sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fiir
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich and illustrated by
Miinster (1839). One specimen was identified as belong¬
ing to Miinster ’s originai collection thanks to thè 191*1 cen¬
tury labels. We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Miinster:
BSPG AS VII 739 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 7 cm
BSPG AS VII 740 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
20
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GONTER SCHWEIGERT
BSPG AS VII 750 - Miinster (1839), PI. 13 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
Description. Large mecochirid with slightly tubercu-
late exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened
having straight dorsal margin. Rostrum short and eden-
tate. Cervical groove deep in thè third anterior of cara¬
pace. Antennal and hepatic grooves deep. Postcervical
and branchiocardiac grooves weak and parallel. Three
carinae strong and tuberculate in gastric and antennal
regions. Ocular incision narrow, and shallow.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI subrectangular of equal
length with slightly tuberculate tergal surface. Pleurae
of somites I-V subtriangular with serrate margins. Telson
subrectangular with one raised tubercle in proximal part
of dorsal surface, a pair of thin spine in thè distai part of
lateral margins, a thin median spine on lower margin and
rounded distai extremity. Protopod subrectangular. Uro-
podal endopod with a strong median longitudinal carina.
Uropodal exopod with a strong median longitudinal
carina and a rounded diaeresis with upper serrate margin
having one longer median spine. Fringed lower margins
of uropodal endopod and exopod.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. Antennulae not
preserved. Antennal articles strong, and elongate of which
thè distai one carries a strong elongate multiarticulate
flagellum, twice thè body length. Scaphocerite triangular
with pointed distai extremity.
Thoracic appendages. Extraordinary extension ofperei-
opod I subchelate. Possibly this is a character of female
specimens (see M. brevimanus below supposed to be thè
corresponding male). Lower margin of propodus with one
strong and sharp distai tooth. Movable finger strong and
elongate with tuberculate upper and lower margins. Dorsal
surface of movable finger with two parallel rows of small
tubercles. Fringed lower margin of merus, carpus, and
propodus of pereiopod I. Fringed upper and lower margins
of movable finger of pereiopod I. Pereiopod II subchelate
with strong and stout propodus. Fringed lower margins of
merus, carpus, and propodus of pereiopod II. Pereiopods
III-V of equal length and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu¬
late flagella.
Discussion. Forster (1971) reviewed this genus,
including 18 species. Later, Simpson & Middleton (1985),
studying a sample of mecochirids from thè Lower Creta-
ceous of England, described thè new genus Meyerella
having as type species Mecochirus magnus McCoy, 1849.
Moreover, thè authors, using as reference Forster (1971),
pointed out that Mecochirus schwarzi (Kitchin, 1913)
is synonym with Mecochirus rapax (Harbort, 1905),
better referred to Meyerella , and Mecochirus mexicanus
(Rathbun, 1935) and Mecochirus bolivari (Van Strae-
len, 1927) are synonyms of Meyerella magna (McCoy,
1849). Finally, thè authors pointed out that Mecochirus
ornatus (Phillips, 1829) was thè type species of Meyeria
McCoy, 1849, and Mecochirus gracilis (Glaessner, 1932)
belongs to this genus. Today, Mecochirus Germar, 1827,
'• n from thè Lower Jurassic (Sinemurian) to thè
Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Europe (Germany,
France, England and Italy), Greenland, South America
(Chile), Antarctic Peninsula and New Zealand, includes
fifteen species. Three species are known from thè Lower
Jurassic: M. olifex Quenstedt, 1856 (Germany - Sinemu¬
rian), M. germari Garassino, 1996 (Italy - Sinemurian),
and M. eckerti Frentzen, 1937 (Germany - Toarcian).
Three species have been recognized from thè Middle
Jurassic: M. clypeatus (Carter, 1898) (England - Batho-
nian), M. socialis (v. Meyer, 1841) (Germany, France,
England - Callovian), and M. pearcei McCoy, 1849
(England - Oxfordian). Seven species are described from
thè Upper Jurassic: M. peytoni Woodward, 1876 (France,
England - Kimmeridgian), M. leionotus (Krause, 1891)
(Germany - Kimmeridgian), M. minimus (Hée, 1924)
(France - Kimmeridgian), M. marwicki Glaessner, 1960
(New Zealand - Kimmeridgian), M. chilensis Forster &
Hillebrandt, 1984 (Chile - Kimmeridgian), and M. longi-
manatus (Schlotheim, 1822) (Germany - Tithonian). One
is known from thè Lower Cretaceous: M. houdardi Van
Straelen, 1936 (France - Albian), and two are reported
from thè Upper Cretaceous: M. crofti Ball, 1960 (Antarc¬
tic Peninsula - Campanian), and M. rostratus Collins &
Rasmussen, 1 992 (Greenland - Maastrichtian).
Germar (1827), describing Mecochirus bajeri on one
incomplete specimen, pointed out thè main morphologi-
cal differences respect M. longimanatus, such as a shorter
pereiopod I and thè abdomen longer than carapace. Oppel
( 1 862) pointed out that thè shorter pereiopod I is thè main
morphological characters distinguished M. bajeri from
thè type species. However, thè study of specimens of M.
longimanatus and M. bajeri, having thè same dimensionai
class, showed that thè length of pereiopod I was thè same,
as well as thè length of thè abdomen. Moreover, thè speci¬
mens belonging to M. bajeri showed thè same morpholog¬
ical characters of thè type species, such as thè tuberculate
longitudinal carinae of carapace, a strong distai spine of
thè propodus of pereiopod I and thè same structure of tail
fan, enough to consider it as synonym of M. longimanatus,
probably a juvenile stage of thè type species.
Miinster (1839), describing Megachirus brevimanus,
pointed out thè main morphological differences respect
M. longimanatus, such as thè shorter pereiopod I and pro¬
podus of pereiopod I shorter than carapace. Apart from
these very significai characters, thè specimens belonging
to M. brevimanus exhibit thè same morhological charac¬
ters of thè type species, such as thè tuberculate longitudi¬
nal carinae of carapace, thè strong distai spine of thè pro¬
podus of pereiopod I, and thè same structure of tail fan.
After these remarkable characters in common between
M. longimanatus and M. brevimanus, we suppose these
forms represent sexual dimorphs of a single species. In
fact, in Recent glypheid Neoglyphea inopinata, thè clos-
est living relative of this group of decapods, thè sexual
dimorphism also affects thè lengths of pereiopod I and its
articles, with thè longer ones are developed in thè female
(Forest & de Saint Laurent, 1981, 1989). Thus we sup¬
pose M. brevimanus is thè male and M. longimanatus thè
female form.
Mecochirus dubius (Miinster, 1839)
PI. XIV (fig. 2)
1839 - Pterochirus dubius Miinster; p. 29, PI. 16 (figs. 4-6)
1 840 - Noma lithophila Miinster; p. 22, PI. 3 (fig. 9)
1862 - Mecochirus dubius (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 84, PI. 23 (fig. 3)
1929 - Mecochirus dubius (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 249-250
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
21
Lectotype: BSPG AS I 979 (Oppel, 1 862 - PI. 23, fig.
3), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 11 specimens
belonging to this species from thè collection of thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fìir Palaontologie und Geologie
in Munich. We studied of this originai sample three speci¬
mens in which we identified two specimens, illustrated by
Miinster (1839) and one specimen, illustrated by Oppel
(1862). Four specimens were identified as belonging to
Miinster ’s originai collection thanks to thè 19th century
labels. We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 737 - Miinster (1839), PI. 16 (fig. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 747 - Miinster (1839), PI. 16 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS I 979 - Oppel (1862), PI. 23 (fig. 3)
- incomplete specimen
Discussion. Miinster (1839) justified thè institution
of this species because pereiopod I is shorter and higher
than that of thè other species, pointing out thè difficulty of
giving its morphological description for thè fragmentary
of thè sample. The study of thè originai specimens stili
available has pointed out that their poor state of preserva-
tion and their ventral view made difficult to give not only
a morphological description of M. dubius, but also a com-
parison with thè other species belonging to Mecochirus.
Even though thè small sizes of thè specimens lead us to
think that they could be ontogenetic stages of M. longi-
manatus, it is difficult to assert it.
Infraorder Thalassinidea Latreille, 1831
Superfamily Axioidea Huxley, 1879
Family Axiidae Huxley, 1879
Genus Etallonia Oppel, 1861
Type species: Maglia longimana Miinster, 1839
Etallonia longimana (Miinster, 1839)
Figs. 3, 9, PI. XIV (fig. 3)
1839 -Magila longimana Miinster; p. 25, PI. 10 (fig. 3)
1861 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 361
1862 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Oppel; p. 49, PI. 12 (figs.
5-7)
1904 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Walther; p. 175
1925 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 231, Text-
fig. 109
1929 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 168
1930 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Beurlen & Glaessner; p. 78
1969 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Glaessner; R 477, Text-fig.
282/4
1994 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 120, Fig. 205
1999 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Polz; p. 34, Text-fig. 2, PI. 1
(figs. 5-7)
2005b - Etallonia longimana (Miinster) in Schweigert & Garassino; p. 499
The poor state of preservation of thè originai speci¬
mens and thè lack of better preserved new specimens did
not permit adding new morphological characters to thè
originai description by Miinster. In fact, thè carapace,
cephalic appendages, and tail fan are too poorly preserved
to give their description (Fig. 3).
Dignosis: carapace cylindrical laterally flattened; perei¬
opod I subchelate; pereiopods II with small chela; pereio-
pods III-V achelate; uropodal exopod with diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS VII 259 (Miinster, 1839 - PI.
10, fig. 3), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir
Palaontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported five specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: two from thè
Redenbacher collection and three from thè collection of
thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palaontologie und
Geologie in Munich. We studied of this originai sample
two specimens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
fìir Palaontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we
identified one specimen, illustrated by Miinster (1839)
and one specimen, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report
thè list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 259 - Miinster (1839), PI. 10 (fig. 3)
BSPG AS VII 259 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS Vili 96 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
Description. Small-sized axiid with smooth exoskel-
eton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Poorly preserved in both specimens.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal length
with rounded pleurae. Somite VI subrectangular longer
than thè previuos ones. Telson subrectangular with
rounded distai extremity. Uropodal exopod with weak
longitudinal median carina and rounded diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Antennal flagellum elongate.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I stronger than
thè others and subchelate. Movable finger pointed and
curved downward. Lateral spine (= fixed finger) straight
and shorter than movable finger. Basai spine in more or
less median position, forming with sinus fixed fìnger.
Propodus of pereiopod I with strong longitudinal median
carina. Pereiopods II elongate with small chela. Pereio¬
pods III-V elongate and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Not preserved.
Discussion. Etallonia, very rare in thè lithographic
limestone, was reviewed by Forster (1977). This genus,
known only in thè Upper Jurassic (Oxfordian - Titho¬
nian) of Germany, Poland, and Great Britain, includes
- after Forster (1977) - four species, E. subtilis (Krause,
1908) (Poland - Oxfordian), E. isochela (Woodward,
1876) (Great Britain - Kimmeridgian), E. longimana
and E. hoellorum Polz, 1999 (Germany - Kimmeridgian/
Tithonian).
Forster (1977) synonymized Etallonia and Protaxius.
Maybe he was in error when he made that. The shape of
thè chelae of Callianassa isochela Woodward, 1876 (type
species of Protaxius Beurlen, 1930) is dose to that of P.
suevicus Beurlen, 1930. Forster (1965) took P. suevicus as
synonym of E. suprajurensis (Quenstedt, 1 852). We point
out that probably this is not correct because P. suevicus
lacks thè spine on thè subchela, typical of Etallonia. So
Fòrster’s results have to be reviewed. Two indeterminate
22
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
Fig. 3 - Etallonia longimana (Miinster, 1839), line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
species are known from thè Kimmeridgian and Tithonian
of Great Britain and Tanzania (Arkell, 1933; Beurlen,
1933). An incompletely known species from thè Toarcian
of Italy tentatively included in Etallonia by Garassino &
Teruzzi (2001) probably represents a Megachela Sch-
weigert, 2003.
Genus Magila Miinster, 1839
Type species: Magila latimana Miinster, 1839
Solnhofen species: Magila latimana Miinster, 1839;
Magila desmarestii (Miinster, 1839); ? Magila denticulata
Miinster, 1839
Magila latimana Miinster, 1839
Figs. 4, 9, PI. V (fig. 2), PI. XIV (figs. 4, 5)
1839 - Magila latimana Miinster; p. 25, PI. 10 (fig. 2)
1852 - Pagurus suprajurensis Quenstedt; p. 265, PI. 20 (fig. 9) (not
fig. 8)
1 858 - Pagurus suprajurensis Quenstedt; p. 804, PI. 99 (fig. 20)
1861- Magila latimana Miinster in Oppel; p. 361
1862 - Magila latimana Miinster in Oppel; p. 48, PI. 12 (figs. 1-2)
1862 - Magila suprajurensis (Quenstedt) in Oppel; p. 47
1885 - Pagurus suprajurensis Quenstedt; p. 405, PI. 31 (figs. 37-39)
(not fig. 36)
1891 - Callianassa suprajurensis (Quenstedt) in Krause; p. 209, PI.
14 (fig. 4)
1925 - Magila latimana Miinster in Van Straelen; p. 297
1928 - Magila latimana Miinster in Beurlen; p. 185
1928 Magila suprajurensis (Quenstedt) var. lata Beurlen; p. 185
1929 - Callianassa suprajurensis (Quenstedt) var. lata Beurlen in
Glaessner; p. 92
1930 - Magila suprajurensis (Quenstedt) in Beurlen; p. 229, Text-fig. 5
1965 - Magila latimana Miinster in Fòrster; p. 146, Text-fig. 2, PI. 2
(fig- 7)
1969 - Magila latimana Miinster in Glaessner; R 477, Text-fig. 282/3
1994 - Magila latimana Miinster in Frickhinger; p. 121, Fig. 211
2005b - Magila latimana Miinster in Schweigert & Garassino; p. 499
Diagnosis: Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened;
deep cervical groove strongly directed forward; one or
two carinae weak in antennal region; rostrum short and
edentate; antennal spine well developed; pereiopods I-III
chelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods
II-III; pereiopods IV-V achelate; uropodal exopod with
diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS VI 26 (Oppel, 1 862 - PI. 1 2, fig.
2), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung ftir Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: originally labelled as coming from
“Solnhofen”. According to lithology of thè rock matrix
containing thè lectotype it carne from thè vicinity of
Eichstàtt.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported ten specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: six from thè
Redenbacher collection and four from thè collection of
thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich. We studied of this originai sample
four specimens, housed in Bayerische Staatssammlung
fiir Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we
identified two specimens, illustrated by Miinster (1839)
and two specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We
report thè list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and
Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 199 - Miinster (1839), PI. 10 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 2.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 320 - Miinster (1839), PI. 10 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 2.5 cm
BSPG AS VI 26 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fig. 2)
length of thè specimen: 2.5 cm
BSPG AS I 674 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fig. lb)
- incomplete specimen
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
23
One specimen (n. cat. 0117 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè carapace and thè tail fan, poorly pre-
served in thè originai specimens.
Description. Small-sized axiid with weakly tubercu-
late exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace cylindrical laterally flattened.
Rostrum short, pointed, and edentate. One or two carinae
weak and straight in antennal region. Cervical groove
deep and median strongly directed forwards, reduc-
ing gastric and antennal regions. Cardiac and branchial
regions wide. Antennal spine well developed. Posterior
margin strengthened by a thin marginai carina.
Abdomen. Somites I-V subrectangular of equal length
with rounded pleurae. Somite VI longer than thè previ-
ous ones. Telson subtriangular, as long as uropods, with
pointed distai extremity. Uropodal endopod with a weak
median longitudinal carina ending with a strong spine on
lower margin and a strong distai spine on outer margin.
Uropodal exopod with a weak median longitudinal carina
ending with a small spine on lower margin and a strong
distai spine on outer margin. These spines marked a very
small diaeresis present only on outer half of lower margin.
Outer margin serrate of uropodal exopod (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4 - Magila latimana Miinster, 1839, tail fan, line drawing (F.
Fogliazza).
Cephalic appendages. Poorly preserved. Antennula
with two elongate and thin flagella. Antenna with a very
elongate and thick flagellum twice length of body.
Thoracic appendages. 3rd maxilliped not preserved.
Pereiopod I with stocky and short chelae with movable
and fixed fingers of equal length and with curved distai
extremity. Inner margins of movable and fixed fingers.
Pereiopods II-III with small and thin chelae. Pereiopods
IV-V elongate and achelate. Lower margin of propodus
of pereiopods IV-V with a row of thin spines thè last ones
stronger than thè previous ones.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu-
late flagella.
Discussion. Magila , very rare in thè lithographic
limestone, was reviewed by Forster (1977). This genus,
known from thè Toarcian to Tithonian (Lower - Upper
Jurassic) of Germany, France and Great Britain, includes
six species: M. bonjouri (Etallon, 1861) (France - Toar¬
cian), M. pichleri Oppel, 1862 (Germany, Great Britain
- Callovian), M. straeleni (Patrulius, 1959) (Romania,
Israel - Tithonian), M. latimana Miinster, 1839, M. des-
marestii (Miinster, 1839), and ?M denticulata Miinster,
1839 (Germany - Tithonian). Moreover, Forster (1977)
pointed out that M. prisca (Krause, 1891) must be con-
sidered a synonym of Callianassa krausei Bòhm, 1911.
Finally, Magila includes two subspecies, M. dura bi-
cristata Forster, 1977 (Poland - Oxfordian) and M. dura
dura (Moericke, 1889) (Russia - Tithonian).
Magila desmarestii (Miinster, 1839)
PI. XIV (fig. 6), PI. XV (fig. 1)
1839 -Aura desmaresti Miinster; p. 26, PI. 10 (fig. 5)
1854 -Aura desmarestii Miinster in Pictet; p. 454, PI. 42 (fig. 21)
1862 - Magila robusta Oppel; p. 48, PI. 12 (fig. 3), nov. syn.
1925 - Magila robusta Oppel in Van Straelen; p. 296
1929 - Magila robusta Oppel in Glaessner; p. 246
2000 - Magila cfr. atimana Miinster in Ròper, Rothgaenger & Roth-
gaenger; p. 91, Fig. 106
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS VII 199 (Miinster,
1839 - PI. 10, fig. 5), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa-
mmlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Our studies revealed that Magila robusta from Eich-
stàtt and figured by Oppel (1862 - PI. 12, fig. 3) is syno¬
nym with Magila desmarestii, as discussed below. This
specimen, AS I 675, is thè holotype of Oppel’s species,
housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palaontolo-
gie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen,
ascribed to this species, and housed in Bayerische
Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS VII 199 - Miinster (1839), PI. 10 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm
Oppel (1862) reported thè presence of only one speci¬
men which he assigned to Magila robusta Oppel, 1862,
housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palàon¬
tologie und Geologie in Munich where, today, it is stili
preserved.
BSPG AS I 675 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fig. 3)
- incomplete specimen
Discussion. Miinster (1839) described this species
on one incomplete, small specimen. Even though, it is
ascribed to Magila for thè typical shape of thè chela of
pereiopod I, its poor state of preservation did not allow
a morphological description of M. desmarestii and thè
lack of diagnostic characters, typical of this species,
hardly allow comparison with thè other species of thè
genus.
Oppel (1862) described Magila robusta based on one
incomplete, small specimen. Even though, it is ascribed
to Magila for thè typical shape of thè chela of pereiopod
I, its poor state of preservation did not allow writing a
24
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
complete morphological description of M. robusta. How-
ever, thè shape of thè chelae of pereiopod I fits well with
those of M. desmarestii in order to suppose both species
as synonym.
IMagila denticulata Miinster, 1839
1839 -Maglia denticu/ata Miinster; p. 26, PI. 10 (fig. 4)
1862 - Magila denticu/ata Miinster in Oppel; p. 46
1925 - Magila denticu/ata Miinster in Van Straelen; p. 298
1929 - Eryma sp. in Glaessner; p. 160
Discussion. Miinster (1839) described this species
based on one incomplete, small specimen from Eichstàtt.
The loss of this specimen, probably housed in thè Bay-
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich, made difficult to give a new morphological
description of Magila denticulata Miinster, 1839, in order
to establish its systematic validity, and to compare it with
thè other species of thè genus. So we consider Magila
denticulata a nomen dubium, not being able to establish
its validity or its probable synonymy.
As Van Straelen (1925) and Glaessner (1929) pointed
out, this species should be ascribed to Eryma Meyer,
1 840, for thè shape of chelae that resembles those of this
genus. The drawing by Miinster, however, hardly allows
such interpretation.
Indeterminate Family
Genus Orhomalus Etallon, 1861
Type species: Orhomalus virgulinus Etallon, 1861
Orhomalus deformis (Oppel, 1 862)
PI. XV (fig. 2)
1862 - Magila deformis Oppel; p. 49, PI. 12 (fig. 4)
1 925 - Orhomalus deformis (Oppel) in Van Straelen; p. 328
1 929 - Magila deformis Oppel in Glaessner; p. 245
1929 - Orhomalus deformis (Oppel) in Glaessner; p. 281
Holotype by monotypy: BSPG AS Vili 115 (Oppel,
1862 - PI. 12, fig. 4), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported one specimen,
ascribed to this species, and housed in thè Bayerische
Staatssammlung tur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich where, today, it is stili preserved.
BSPG AS Vili 115 - Oppel (1862), PI. 12 (fìg.4)
- incomplete specimen
Discussion. Oppel (1862) described this species on
one incomplete specimen, ascribing it to Magila Mun-
ster, 1839, based upon thè morphological characters of
thè chelae. However, Van Straelen (1925) pointed out
that thè shape ot thè chelae of pereiopod I is typical of
Orhomalus Etallon, 1861. Even though thè studied speci¬
men is incomplete, it represents one of thè most complete
specimens of this genus since most species are based on
isolate chelae.
Infraorder Palinura Latreille, 1 803
Family Eryonidae De Haan, 1841
Genus Cycleryon Glaessner, 1 965
Type species: Macrourites propinquus Schlotheim,
1822
Solnhofen species: Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim,
1 822); Cycleryon orbicu/atus (Miinster, 1 839); Cycleryon
e/ongatus (Miinster, 1839); Cycleryon wulfi Garassino &
Schweigert, 2004
Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822) (c?)
Figs. 5, 6, 10, PI. VI, PI. XV (figs. 3, 4, 5, 6)
1822 - Macrourites propinquus Schlotheim; p. 35, PI. 3 (fig. 2)
1825 -Eryon Schlotheimi Kònig; p. 95, PI. 8 (fig. 93)
1 827 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Germar; p. 99
1827 - Eryon spinimanus Germar; p. 99, nov. syn. ($)
1829 - Eryon Schlotheimi Kònig in Holl; p. 150
1836 -Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer; p. 271, PI. 12 (figs. 3, 6), nov. syn.
1836 - Eryon Schlotheimi Kònig in v. Meyer; p. 280
1838 - Eryon Rehmanni v. Meyer; p. 415
1 836 - Etyon speciosus Mùnster; p. 5, PI. 2, PI. 3 (fig. 2)
1 839 - Eryon Meyeri Miinster; p. 6, PI. 3 (fig. 1), PI. 4
1 839 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in Miinster; p. 13, PI. 7 (figs. 6-9)
1839 - Eryon elongatus Mùnster; p. 9, PI. 5 (fig. 7)
1 852 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Quenstedt; p. 267, PI. 20
(fig. 19)
1853 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Frischmann; p. 26
1 853 - Eryon speciosus Mùnster in Frischmann; p. 26
1853 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in Frischmann; p. 27
1855 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Fraas; p. 92
1855 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Fraas; p. 93
1 856 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in v. Meyer; p. 44, PI. 10 (fig. 1)
1857 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Quenstedt; p. 805, PI. 99 (figs.
26-27)
1857 - Eryon speciosus Mùnster in Quenstedt; p. 806, PI. 90 (fig. 28,
31)
1862 -Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 12, PI. 1 (figs. 2-4),
PI. 2 (fig. 1)
1862 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Oppel; p. 13, PI. 2 (fig. 2)
1 862 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in Oppel; p. 1 8, PI. 3 (fig. 5)
1 885 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Quenstedt; p. 408, PI. 32 (figs.
4-5)
1 904 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Peiser; p. 25
1904 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Walther; p. 173
1907 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in v. Knebel; p. 213, PI. 13
1908 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Engel; p. 470
1822 - E/yon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 1224
1825 - Coleia propinqua (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 148, Text-
fig. 67
1904 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Walther; p. 1 73
1 904 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in Walther; p. 1 73
1 904 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in Peiser; p. 34
1907 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in v. Knebel; p. 217, Text-fig. 1,
PI. 15
1907 - Eryon Schuberti v. Meyer in v. Knebel; p. 219
1 908 - Eryon spinimanus Germar in Engel; p. 470
1924 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Balss; p. 174, Figs. 1, 7
1925 - Coleia spinimana (Germar) in Van Straelen; p. 150, PI. 5
1925 - Knebelia Schuberti (v. Meyer) in Van Straelen; p. 123
1928 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Beurlen; p. 225
1929- Coleia propinqua (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 127
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
25
1929 - Coleia spinimanus (Germar) in Glaessner; p. 128
1929 - Knebelia Schuberti (v. Meyer) in Glaessner; p. 228
1930 - Cyclocaris propinqua (Schlotheim) in Beurlen & Glaessner;
Text-fig. 12
1934 -Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Dacqué; PI. 42 (fig. 2)
1968 - Eryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Leich; p. 90
1969 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; R 470, Text-
fig. 274/4a, b
1969 - Knebelia schuberti (v. Meyer) in Malz; p. 296, Text-fig. 6
1969 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Forster; p. 55, PI. 3 (fig. 1 )
1969 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Malz; p. 293, Text-fig. 3
1978 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Barthel; p. 328, 330, PI.
44-45
1994 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 116, Figs.
197-198
1 994 - Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar) in Frickhinger; Text-fig. 1 99
1994 - Knebelia schuberti (v. Meyer) in Frickhinger; p. 120, Fig. 2 1 0
1 995 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Dietl, Kapitzke & Rieter;
PI. 2 (fig. 2)
2000 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim) in Ròper, Rothgaenger &
Rothgaenger; Text-fig. 16
2001 - Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar) in Schweigert; p. 5, Text-fig. 1,
PI. 1 (figs. 1-2), PI. 2 (figs. 1-2), PI. 3 (figs. 1-4)
2001 - Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar) in Dietl & Schweigert; p. 108,
Text-fig. 140
Diagnosis: carapace subcircular ventrally flattened;
median postcervical carina strong and branchial carinae
weak; cervical and postcervical incisions deep dividing
margin into three parts; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereio-
pod V achelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than
pereiopods II-V; pereiopods successively shorter posteri-
orly; uropodal exopod petaloid without diaeresis.
Lectotype: MNHB MB. A. 1107 (Schlotheim, 1822
- PI. 3, fig. 2), housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde der
Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin.
Our studies revealed that Eryon spinimanus from
Solnhofen and figured by Walch (1773 - PI. 14, fig. 1) is
synonym with Cycleryon propinquus, as discussed below.
The originai specimen is lost, so we decide to designate
thè specimen BSPG AS I 982 as thè neotype (= allotype
of Cycleryon propinquus) of Germar ’s species, housed in
thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich.
Our studies revealed that thè minute Eryon schuberti
ffom Solnhofen and figured by v. Meyer (1836 - PI. 12,
figs. 3, 6) is synonym with Cycleryon propinquus, as dis¬
cussed below. This specimen, SMF X/m 144-146, is thè
holotype of v. Meyer’s species, housed in Natur-Museum
Senckenberg in Frankfurt am Main.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel ( 1 862) reported 36 specimens belong-
ing to this species, so divided: five from thè Redenbacher
collection, two from thè Schlotheim collection, four from
thè Fraas collection and 25 from thè collection of thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich. We studied of this originai sample two speci¬
mens of Schlotheim collection, housed in thè Museum fur
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin, and three
specimens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we iden-
tified one specimen, illustrated by Munster (1839), and
two specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè
list of thè specimens, studied by Munster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 765 - Munster (1839), PI. 3 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
BSPG AS V 31 - Oppel (1862), PI. 1 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 12 cm
BSPG AS VI 42 - Oppel (1862), PI. 2 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
Oppel (1862) reported four specimens which he
assigned to Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1827) so
divided: one from thè Alberti collection (today SMNS),
one from thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich
and two from thè Fraas collection (today SMNS). We
studied two specimens of this originai sample, housed
in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich in which we identified one specimen,
illustrated by Oppel (1862), and one specimen, illustrated
by v. Knebel (1907). We report thè list of thè specimens,
studied by Oppel and v. Knebel:
BSPG AS VI 40 - Oppel (1862), PI. 2 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 12 cm
BSPG AS I 982 - Knebel (1907), PI. 15 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
Oppel (1862) reported 56 specimens which he
assigned to Eryon schuberti v. Meyer, 1836, so divided:
16 from thè Redenbacher collection and 40 from thè
collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur Palà¬
ontologie und Geologie in Munich. We studied of this
originai sample four specimens, housed in thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich illustrated by Munster (1839). We report thè list
of thè specimens, studied by Munster:
BSPG AS VII 751 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 755 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 756 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 7)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS VII 757 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 8)
- length of thè specimen: 1.5 cm
Description. Large eryonid with densely tuberculate
exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subcircular ventrally flattened,
wider than long. Frontal margin strengthened with small
tuburcles, without rostrum. Cervical and postcervical
incisions deep dividing margin into three parts. Ocular
incision small and narrow. Median postcervical carina
strongly tuberculate. Branchial carinae weak and tuber¬
culate. Posterior margin of carapace with row of strong
tubercles. Lateral margins of carapace strongly dentate.
Dorsal surface of carapace densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II-VI subrectangular of equal length.
Pleurae and lateral parts of somites II-VI fìnely tubeculate,
median part of somites smooth. Pleurae strongly dentate.
Somites I-V with a strongly raised median tergal carina.
Telson lanceolate with a strongly raised basai tubercle,
a pair of proximal tubercles dose to lateral margins, a
median longitudinal carina, two submedian carinae, and
rounded distai extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uropodal
endopod subrectangular with a strong median longitudi¬
nal carina. Uropodal exopod petaloid without diaeresis
and with a strong median longitudinal carina.
26
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GONTER SCHWEIGERT
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk very short. 3rd maxil-
liped elongate and spineless. Antennular articles thin of
which thè distai one carries two short multiarticulate
flagella of equal length. Antennal articles short and stout
of which thè distai one carries a thin multiarticulate flag-
ellum. Mouth fìeld displaying crista dentata on 3rd maxil-
liped and mandibles (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5 - Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822), ventral view of
carapace, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with strong and
elongate propodus. Chela of pereiopod I with fixed finger
gently curved in thè distai part and movable finger curved
distally with enlarged distai extremity. Thin median longi-
tudinal carina extends for total length of propodus. Inner
margins of movable and fixed fìngers edentate in thè male;
three strong proximal teeth in thè inner margin of movable
tinger in thè temale (Figs. 5, 6). Surface of merus, carpus,
propodus, movable and fixed fìngers smooth. Pereiopods
’l-'V with small chelae of equal length. Outer margins
of carpus and propodus of pereiopods II-III strengthened
w ith a row of small tubercles. Pereiopods V shorter than
others and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. loday, Cycleryon Glaessner, 1965,
known from thè Middle Jurassic (Callovian) to thè Upper
Jurassic ( lithonian) of Europe (France and Germany),
includes five species. One from thè Middle Jurassic, C.
giganteus (Van Straelen, 1923) (France - Callovian);
three from thè Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian - Titho-
nian) of Germany, C. propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822), C.
elongatus (Miinster, 1 839), and C. orbiculatus (Miinster,
1839). Cycleryon armatus (v. Knebel, 1907) and C. sub-
rotundus are interpreted as synonyms with C. orbiculatus
(see C. armatus and C. subrotundus in this paper).
Recently, Garassino & Schweigert (2004) described
from thè Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) of Blumenberg
quarry, dose to thè city of Eichstàtt (Bavaria, S Ger¬
many), thè new species C. wulfi.
Fig. 6 - Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1827), pereiopod I, line draw¬
ing (F. Fogliazza).
Germar (1827) pointed out that thè presence of two
strong spines in thè proximal part of thè inner margin of
movable finger was a morphological character enough
to distinguish C. spinimanus (Germar, 1827) from C.
propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822). Subsequently, after thè
review of Cycleryon Glaessner, 1965, in thè Nusplingen
Lithographic Limestone (S Germany) by Schweigert
(200 la), C. spinimanus is considered as thè female of C.
propinquus.
The poor state of preservation of thè type speci¬
men of Eryon schuberti v. Meyer, 1836, did not allow
extending its morphological analysis. In fact, it is very
ditficult to recognize some diagnostic characters in order
to describe this species, as already reported by Oppel
(1862) who pointed out thè poor preservation of thè
specimen. V. Meyer (1836) erected E. schuberti as new
species of Eryon Desmarest, 1822. Van Straelen (1925)
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
27
ascribed this species to Knebelia Van Straelen, 1922,
for thè small size of its specimen with strongly curved
chelae of perieopod I. Even though thè originai speci¬
men shows thè frontal margin with two subrectangular
lobes typical of Knebelia , this morphological characters
is also observable in many eryonid juvenile specimens
belonging to C. propinquus. We consider thè resemblace
between K. schuberti and K. bilobata , type species of
thè genus, only a homoemorphy in order to consider thè
originai specimen of K. schuberti as juvenile stage of C.
propinquus.
Cycleryon orbiculatus (Munster, 1839)
Figs. 7a, 10, PI. XVI (figs. 1, 2, 3, 4)
1839 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster; p. 7, PI. 5 (figs. 1-2)
1839 - Eryon latus Munster; p. 8, PI. 5 (figs. 4-6), PI. 7 (fig. 1)
1839 - Eryon subrotundus Munster; p. 12, PI. 7 (figs. 4-5), nov. syn.
1853 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster in Frischmann; p. 27
1853 - Eryon latus Munster in Frischmann; p. 27
1853 - Eryon subrotundus Miinster in Frischmann; p. 27
1862 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster in Oppel; p. 14, PI. 2 (fig. 3)
1 862 - Eryon subrotundus Munster in Oppel; p. 14
1904 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster in Walther; p. 173
1907 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster in v. Knebel; p. 215
1907 - Eryon armatus v. Knebel; p. 215, PI. 14, nov. syn.
1925 - Coleia orbiculata (Munster) in Van Straelen; p. 147
1925 - Coleia armata (Knebel) in Van Straelen; p. 153
1928 - Eryon orbiculatus Munster in Beurlen; p. 277
1929 - Coleia orbiculata (Munster) in Glaessner; p. 127
1929 - Coleia armata (Knebel) in Glaessner; p. 125
1994 - Cycleryon orbiculatus (Munster) in Frickhinger; p. 116, Fig.
196
2001 - Cycleryon orbiculatus (Munster) in Dietl & Schweigert; p. 54,
Text.fig. 89
Diagnosis: carapace subcircular ventrally flattened;
median postcervical carina, and branchial carinae absent;
cervical and postcervical incisions deep dividing margin
into three parts; suborbitai tooth strong and outer orbitai
tooth strong; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereiopod V ache-
late; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods II-V;
pereiopods successively shorter posteriorly; uropodal
exopod petaloid without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS VII 760 - Munster (1839), PI.
5 (fig. 2), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Our studies revealed that Eryon armatus from an
unknown locality and fìgured by v. Knebel (1907 - PI.
14) is synonym with Cyclery’on orbiculatus , as discussed
below. This specimen, MNHB MB. A. 236, is thè lecto¬
type of v. KnebeTs species, housed in thè Museum fur
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin.
Our studies revealed that Eryon subrotundus from
Eichstàtt and figured by Munster (1839 - PI. 7, Fig. 5)
is synonym with Cycleryon orbiculatus , as discussed
below. This juvenile specimen, BSPG AS VII 762, is
thè lectotype of Miinster’s species, housed in thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - lower Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 40 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 15 from thè Reden-
bacher collection, 24 from thè collection of thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung fUr Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich and 1 from thè Palaeontological Museum of
Zurich (from Nusplingen). We studied three specimens of
this originai sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich
in which we identified three specimens, illustrated by
Munster (1839), and one specimen, illustrated by Oppel
(1862). We report thè list of thè specimens, studied by
Munster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VI 38 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
BSPG AS VII 760 - Munster (1839), PI. 5 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 6 cm
BSPG AS I 990 - Oppel (1862), PI. 2 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
V. Knebel (1907) did not report in thè description of
E. armatus thè number of studied specimens, illustrat-
ing only one specimen, today housed in thè Museum fur
Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin:
MNHB MB. A. 236 - v. Knebel (1907), PI. 14
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
Munster (1839) reported two specimens which he
assigned to Eryon subrotundus Munster, 1839, belonging
to thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich where, today, they
are stili preserved. We report thè list of thè specimens,
studied by Munster:
BSPG AS VII 762 - Miinster (1839), PI. 7 (figs. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 3.5 cm
BSPG AS VII 763 - Munster (1839), PI. 7 (fig. 4)
- incomplete specimen
Description. Median-sized eryonid with densely
tuberculate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subcircular ventrally flattened,
wider than long. Frontal margin without rostrum. Cervical
and postcervical incisions deep dividing margin into three
parts. Ocular incision small and narrow. Suborbitai tooth
strong. Median postcervical and branchial carinae absent.
Lateral margins of carapace strongly dentate. Dorsal sur-
face of carapace densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II- VI subrectangular of equal length
and with fìnely tubeculate dorsal surface. Pleurae finely
tuberculate. Somites I-V with a weakly raised median
tergal carina. Telson laceolate with a median longitudi-
nal carina, two submedian carinae, and rounded distai
extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uropodal endopod subre¬
ctangular with a strong median longitudinal carina. Uro¬
podal exopod petaloid without diaeresis and with a strong
median longitudinal carina.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk very short. 3rd maxil-
liped elongate and spineless. Antennular articles thin of
which thè distai one carries two short multiarticulate flag¬
ella of equal length. Antennal articles short and stout of
which thè distai one carries a thin multiarticulate flagellum.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with strong and
stout propodus. Chela of pereiopod I with movable finger
curved at distai extremity and straight fixed fìnger. Thin
median longitudinal carina extends for total length of
propodus. Inner margins of movable and fixed fingers
edentate. Surface of merus, carpus, propodus, movable,
28
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
and fixed fingers smooth. Pereiopods II-IV with small
chelae of equal length. Pereiopods V shorter than others
and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Miinster (1839) described this species on
eight specimens, pointing out that they differed from thè
type species because thè chela of pereiopod I was shorter
and thicker. Today, only three originai specimens are
available and their study allowed recognition of other
morphological characters useful to justify thè systematic
validity of this species. In fact, thè strong suborbitai tooth,
thè strong outer orbitai tooth and thè lack of carinae on thè
dorsal surface of carapace distinguish C. orbiculatus from
thè type species and from C. elongatus (see C. elongatus
in this paper) (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7 - a) Cycleryon orbiculatus (Miinster, 1839), line drawing; b)
Cycleryon elongatus (Miinster, 1839), line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
V. Knebel (1907) described E. armatus on some small-
sized specimens, pointing out that they differed from C.
propinquus and C. orbiculatus for thè shorter chela of
pereiopod I, thè triangular shape of ocular incision, and
thè shorter abdomen. The study of thè only available
specimen allowed recognition of some morphological
characters, typical of C. orbiculatus in order to consider
thè studied specimen as juvenile stage of this species. In
fact, thè shape of carapace wider than long, thè strong
suborbitai tooth, thè strong outer orbitai tooth, and thè
lack of carinae on thè dorsal surface of carapace are char¬
acters observable also in Miinster’s species.
Miinster (1839) reported only some morphological
characters of carapace and pereiopod I of Eryon sub-
rotundus because thè poor state of preservation of thè
specimens. Oppel (1862) pointed out that thè originai
specimens studied by Miinster could be juvenile stages
of C. orbiculatus. This is confirmed by thè re-study of thè
lectotype using ultraviolet illumination.
Cycleryon elongatus (Miinster, 1839)
Figs. 7b, 10, PI. XVI (fig. 5)
1839 - Eryon elongatus Miinster; p. 9, PI. 5 (fig. 7)
1 853 - Eryon elongatus Miinster in Frischmann; p. 27
1 862 - Eryon elongatus Miinster in Oppel; p. 15, PI. 2 (fig. 4)
1904 -Eryon elongatus Miinster in Walther; p. 173
1907 - Eryon elongatus Mùnster in v. Knebel; p. 216
1 925 - Coleia elongata (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 1 53
1929 - Coleia elongata (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 126
1969 - Cycleryon elongatus (Miinster) in Malz; p. 295, Text-fig. 4
1999 - Cycleryon elongatus (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 116, Fig. 195
Diagnosis: carapace subcircular ventrally flattened;
median postcervical carina and branchial carinae weak;
cervical and postcervical incisions deep dividing margin
into three parts; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereiopod V
achelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods
II-V; pereiopods successively shorter posteriorly; uropo-
dal exopod rounded without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS VII 761 (Miinster, 1839 — PI.
5, fig. 7), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported three specimens
belonging to this species and housed in thè collection of
thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich. We studied this originai sample
recognizing one specimen, illustrated by Miinster (1839),
and two specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1 862). We report
thè list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 761 - Miinster (1839), PI. 5 (fig. 7)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
BSPG AS VI 43 - Oppel (1862), PI. 2 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
BSPG AS I 939 - Oppel (1862), PI. 2 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
One specimen (n. cat. 9419 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè carapace, poorly preserved in thè
originai specimens.
Description. Median-sized eryonid with densely
tuberculate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subcircular ventrally flattened,
wider than long. Frontal margin without rostrum. Cervical
and postcervical incisions deep dividing margin into three
parts. Ocular incison small and narrow. Median postcer¬
vical carina weakly tuberculate and raised. Branchial
carinae weak and tuberculate. Lateral margins of cara¬
pace weakly dentate. Dorsal surface of carapace densely
tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II- VI subrectangular of equal length.
Pleurae and lateral parts of somites II-VI finely tubercu¬
late, median part of somites smooth. Pleurae weakly den¬
tate. Somites I-V without a median tergal carina. Telson
lanceolate with two submedian carinae and rounded distai
extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uropodal endopod subre¬
ctangular with a strong median longitudinal carina. Uro¬
podal exopod rounded without diaeresis and with a strong
median longitudinal carina.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk very short. 3rd maxil-
liped elongate and spineless. Antennular articles thin of
which thè distai one carries two short multiarticulate
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
29
flagella of equal length. Antennal articles short and stout
of which thè distai one carries a thin multiarticulate flag¬
ellimi. Mouth field displaying crista dentata on 3rd maxil-
liped and mandibles.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with strong, stout
propodus. Chela of pereiopod I with movable finger
curved at distai extremity and straight fixed finger. Thin
median longitudinal carina runs for total length of pro¬
podus. Inner margins of movable and fixed fingers eden-
tate. Surface of merus, carpus, propodus, movable, and
fixed fingers smooth. Pereiopods II-IV with small chelae
of equal length. Pereiopods V shorter than others and
achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Even though Miinster (1839) did not
establish thè morphological characters, typical of this
species, he pointed out that thè short chela of pereiopod
I was similar between C. elongatus and C. orbiculatus.
Oppel (1862) compared C. elongatus with C. propinquus,
telling that thè sizes of pereiopod I and of thè abdomen
are different between thè two species. In fact, pereiopod I
is longer and thè abdomen is smaller in thè type species.
Even though there are some morphological affinities
among C. elongatus, C. orbiculatus, and C. propinquus,
thè study of thè originai specimens revealed that thè tail
fan in C. elongatus is completely different than that on thè
other two. In fact, thè telson in C. elongatus is character-
ized by only two lateral carinae, while in thè other two
species, thè telson has one median longitudinal carina
and two lateral carinae. Moreover, thè uropodal exopod
in C. elongatus has a rounded shape with rounded distai
extremity, while in thè other two species, thè uropodal
exopod has a petaloid shape with pointed distai extremity
at thè conjunction between thè lower and lateral margins
(Fig.7). ‘
Genus Eryon Desmarest, 1 822
Type species: Macrourites arctiformis Schlotheim,
1822
Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1820)
Fig. 11, PI. VII, PI. XVII (fig. 1)
1820 - Macrourites arctiformis Schlotheim; p. 37
1822 - Macrourites arctiformis Schlotheim; p. 34, PI. 3 (fig. 1)
1822 - Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest in Brogniart; p. 128, PI. 10 (fig. 4)
1823 - Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest in Kriiger; p. 587
1825 - Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest; p. 209, PI. 34 (fig. 3)
1825 - Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest in Kriiger; p. 265
1827 - Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest in Germar; p. 98
1827 - Eryon acutusl Germar; p. 100
1836 -Eryon Cuvieri Desmarest in v. Meyer; p. 273, PI. 12 (fig. 5)
1837 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Bronn; p. 474, PI. 137 (fig.
2)
1839 -Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Miinster; p. 3, PI. 1
1839 - Eryon pentagonus Miinster; p. 10, PI. 6 (fig. 1)
1839 -Eryon subpentagonus Miinster; p. 10, PI. 6 (fig. 2)
1862 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Oppel; p. 15, PI. 3 (fig. 1)
1904 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Peiser; p. 25
1907 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in v. Knebel: p. 200, PI. 1 1 (fig.
1,6), PI. 12
1924 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Balss; p. 174, Text-figs. 3, 6
1925 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Van Straelen; p. 114, Text-
fig. 63
1929 -Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; p. 164
1969 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Glaessner; R 470, Text-fig.
274/2
1969 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Malz; p. 292, Text-figs. 1-2
1994 - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Frickhinger; p. 120, Figs.
203-204
2005b - Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim) in Schweigert & Garassino;
p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace subcircular ventrally flattened;
median postcervical carina and branchial carinae weak;
cervical and postcervical incisions deep dividing margin
into three parts; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereiopod V
achelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods
II-V; pereiopods successively shorter posteriorly; uropo¬
dal exopod petaloid without diaeresis.
Holotype: Macrourites arctiformis (= Eryon arcti¬
formis), MNHB K 38 MB.A. 253 (Schlotheim, 1822 - PI.
3, fig. 1; length of thè specimen: 7.5 cm), housed in thè
Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universitàt in
Berlin.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 170 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: 80 from thè Reden-
bacher collection and 90 from thè collection of thè Bayer-
ische Staatssammlung fur Palaontologie und Geologie in
Munich. We studied of this originai sample thè holotype
by Schlotheim, housed in thè Museum fur Naturkunde
der Humboldt-Universitàt in Berlin, and six specimens,
housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontolo-
gie und Geologie in Munich in which we identified five
specimens, illustrated by Miinster (1839), and one speci¬
men, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè list of thè
specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 758 - Miinster (1839), PI. 2
- length of thè specimen: 16 cm
BSPG AS VII 764 - Miinster (1839), PI. 1 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 1 1 cm
BSPG AS VII 766 - Miinster (1839), PI. 1 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
BSPG AS VII 767 - Miinster (1839), PI. 1 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 12 cm
BSPG AS VII 1431 - Miinster (1839), PI. 6 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 7 cm
BSPG AS VI 41 - Oppel (1862), PI. 3 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
Description. Large eryonid with densely tuberculate
exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subcircular ventrally flattened,
wider than long. Frontal margin strengthened with small
tuburcles and without rostrum. Cervical and postcervical
incisions deep dividing margin into three parts. Ocular
incisions developed in conical structures carrying an elon-
gate eyestalk. Median postcervical carina strongly tuber¬
culate and raised. Branchial carinae weak and tuberculate.
Posterior margin of carapace concave. Lateral margins of
carapace strongly dentate, originally hearing fringes simi¬
lar to those of M. longimanatus (not figured in thè recon-
struction). These fringed margins are only observable in
30
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
rapidly buried specimens, and they are not preserved in
moults. Dorsal surface of carapace densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II-VI subrectangular of equal length and
with finely tuberculate dorsal surface. Pleurae strongly
dentate. Somites II-VI with a strongly raised median
tergal carina. Telson lanceolate with a strongly raised
median longitudinal carina and with pointed distai
extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uropodal endopod sub¬
rectangular with a strong median longitudinal carina.
Uropodal exopod petaloid without diaeresis and with a
strong carina extending parallel to outer margin. In rap¬
idly buried specimens, thè uropodal endopod and exopod
show a fringed margin.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk elongate. 3rd maxil-
liped elongate and spineless. Antennular articles thin
of which thè distai one carries two short multiarticulate
flagella of equal length. Antennal articles short and stout
of which thè distai one carries a thin multiarticulate flag-
ellum. Mouth fìeld displaying crista dentata on 3rd maxil-
liped and mandibles.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with strong and
elongate propodus. Chela of pereiopod I with fìxed finger
straight and movable fìnger bent distally with enlarged
distai extremity. Inner margins of movable and fìxed
fingers edentate. Surface of merus, carpus, propodus,
movable, and fìxed fingers smooth. Pereiopods II-IV with
small chelae of equal length. Pereiopods V shorter than
others and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Today, Eryon Desmarest, 1822, known
from thè Middle Jurassic (Callovian) to thè Upper Cre-
taceous (Campanian) of Europe (Germany, France and
England), includes five species. Three from thè Middle
Jurassic: E. perroni Etallon, 1859, and E. ellipticus Van
Straelen, 1922 (France - Callovian), and E. sublevis
Carter, 1886 (England - Oxfordian). One from thè Upper
Jurassic: E. arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1822) (Germany
- Kimmeridgian/Tithonian). One from thè Lower Creta-
ceous: 1E. neocomiensis Woodward, 1881 (Silesia -Neo-
comian; inclusion in Eryon is very uncertain). Eryon
yehoachi Remy & Avnimelech, 1955, from thè Upper
Cretaceous of Israel was redescribed as a fossil stomato-
pod species by Hof (1998).
Genus Rosenfeldia Garassino, Teruzzi &
Dalla Vecchia, 1996
Type species: Rosenfeldia triasica Garassino, Teruzzi
& Dalla Vecchia, 1996
Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward, 1866)
PI. XVII (fig. 2)
1866 - Eryon Oppeli Woodward; p. 500, PI. 24 (fig. 4)
1925 - Eryon Oppeli Woodward in v. Straelen; p. 120
1929 - Eryon Oppeli Woodward in Glaessner; p. 166
1963 - Eryon oppeli Woodward in Kuhn; p. 22
2003 - Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward) in Schweigert & Garassino; p.
178, Fig. 2A
2004a - Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward) in Schweigert, p. 70, Text-fig.
without number
2004b - Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward) in Schweigert; p. 329, Text-
fig. without number
2005a - Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward) in Schweigert & Frattigiani;
p. 1 98, Text-fig. without number
2005b - Rosenfeldia oppeli (Woodward) in Schweigert & Frattigiani; p.
328, Text-fig. without number
Holotype by monotypy: BM 44886, housed in thè
Naturai History Museum in London.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: originally labelled as coming from Sol- .
nhofen. According to thè lithology of thè rock matrix it
comes from thè surroundings of Eichstàtt.
Material: Woodward (1866) reported one incomplete
specimen, belonging to thè Hàberlein collection and
today housed in thè Naturai History Museum in London.
In 2004 a second specimen was recovered from thè Mòm-
sheim Formation of thè Horstberg quarry near Mòmsheim
(H. & K. Schumacher collection).
Discussion. Woodward (1866) based his description
on an incomplete specimen belonging to thè Hàberlein
collection, justifìng thè institution of Eryon oppeli on
two morphological characters: pereiopod I is small if
compared with thè four succeding pereiopods and smaller
than pereiopod I present in thè other species of Eryon
Desmarest, 1822, and thè subrectangular telson exhibited
rounded lateral margins that are different from thè sub-
triangular telson typical of Eryon. Even though thè poor
state of preservation of thè specimen did not allow rec-
ognition of thè main morphological characters useful to
establish its placement in this genus, surely thè specimen
must be ascribed to thè family Eryonidae De Haan, 1841,
for thè lack of thè diaeresis on thè uropodal exopod.
Garassino et al. (1996) described Rosenfeldia from
thè Late Triassic (Norian) of NE Italy, belonging to thè
family Eryonidae for thè lack of a diaeresis on thè uropo¬
dal exopod and characterized by a subrounded carapace,
chela of pereiopod I with movable finger longer than fìxed
finger and curved at thè distai extremity, subrectangular
telson with dentate lateral margins, and uropodal endopod
and exopod with dentate lateral margins.
Even though thè originai specimen by Woodward
is incomplete (only maxillae, pereiopods I-V, abdomi¬
nal somites IV-VI and tail fan are preserved), its study
pointed out some morphological characters, such as thè
dentate pleural margins of somites IV-VI, thè dentate lat¬
eral margins of thè telson and thè dentate lateral margins
of uropodal endopod and exopod, typical of Rosenfeldia.
Therefore, E. oppeli is referred to this genus. In one of thè
newly recovered specimens (H. & K. Schumacher collec¬
tion) thè carapace is also missing, and its overall preser-
vational state is worse than that of thè holotype. Another
two specimens (Frattigiani collection) exhibit also poor
remains of thè carapace (Schweigert, 2005; Schweigert
& Garassino, in press). The ascription of E. oppeli to this
genus expands thè stratigraphic range of Rosenfeldia.
Rosenfeldia is now represented by two species, R.
triasica (Norian) and R. oppeli (Tithonian). Rosenfeldia j
was only known by thè type species R. triasica Garassino,
Teruzzi & Dalla Vecchia, 1996, from thè Upper Triassic
(Norian) of NE Italy. R. oppeli differs from thè Triassic
one in hearing smaller chelae in pereiopod I, thè lateral
margins of pereiopods I-IV being smooth and thè telson
having a weak longitudinal median carina.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
31
Genus Knebelia Van Straelen, 1 922
Type species: Eryon bilobatus Miinster, 1839
Knebelia bilobata (Miinster, 1839)
Fig. 11, PI. Vili, PI. XVII (figs. 3, 4)
1839 - Eryon bilobatus Miinster; p. 11, PI. 6 (figs. 3-5)
1 853 - Eryon bilobatus Miinster in Frischmann; p. 27
1862 - Eryon bilobatus Miinster in Oppel; p. 16, PI. 3 (fig. 2)
1904 - Eryon bilobatus Miinster in Peiser; p. 25, 32
1904 - Eryon bilobatus Miinster in Walther; p. 173
1907 - Miinsteria bilobata (Miinster) in v. Knebel; p. 223
1922 - Knebelia bilobata (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 982
1925 - Knebelia bilobata (Miinster) in Van Straelen; p. 121
1929 - Knebelia bilobata (Miinster) in Glaessner; p. 227
1969 - Knebelia bilobata (Miinster) in Glaessner; R 470, Text-fig.
274/1
1994 -Knebelia bilobata (Miinster) in Frickhinger; p. 120, Fig. 209
Diagnosis: carapace subsquare ventrally flattened;
frontal margin with two subrectangular lobes and with a
deep and very narrow cephalic incision; cervical and post-
cervical incisions weak dividing margin into three parts;
cervical groove weak; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereiopod
V achelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereio¬
pods II-V; pereiopods successively shorter posteriorly;
uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS VI 39 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 3, fig.
2), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported ten specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: four from thè
Redenbacher collection and six from thè collection of thè
Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geolo¬
gie in Munich. We studied four specimens of this originai
sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur
Palaontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we iden-
tified three specimens illustrated by Miinster (1839), and
one specimen, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè
list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS VII 752 - Miinster (1839), PI. 6 (fig. 5)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS VII 753 - Miinster (1839), PI. 6 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 7 cm
BSPG AS VII 754 - Miinster (1839), PI. 6 (fig. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 7 cm
BSPG AS VI 39 - Oppel (1862), PI. 3 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 8 cm
Description. Large eryonid with densely tuberculate
exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subsquare ventrally flattened.
Frontal margin formed with two subrectangular lobes
with a deep and very narrow cephalic incision and with¬
out rostrum. Cervical and postcerical incisions weak
dividing margin into three parts. Ocular incision narrow
located laterally. Cervical groove weak. Posterior margin
narrow and strongly convex and strengthened by a row of
small tubercles. Dorsal surface densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II-VI subrectangular of equal length and
with finely tuberculate dorsal surface. Pleurae smooth.
Somites II-VI with a median tergal carina strongly raised.
Telson laceolate with one longitudinal median carina, two
slightly raised submedian carinae, one basai tubercle,
and pointed distai extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uro¬
podal endopod subrectangular with a strong longitudinal
median carina. Uropodal exopod subrectangular without
diaeresis and with a strong longitudinal median carina.
Cephalic appendages. Eyestalk short. 3rd maxilliped,
antennulae and antennae poorly preserved.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with slender and
elongate propodus. Lower margin of merus with a row
of small spines. Chela of pereiopod I with fixed finger
straight and movable finger longer than fixed finger and
bent distally with pointed distai extremity. Inner margins
of movable and fixed fingers edentate. Surface of merus,
carpus, propodus, movable, and fixed fingers smooth.
Pereiopods II-IV with small chelae of equal length. Perei¬
opods V shorter than others and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. Today, Knebelia Van Straelen, 1922,
known only in thè Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) of Ger-
many, includes thè only species, K. bilobata (Miinster,
1839). Eryon schuberti v. Meyer, 1836, often included
in Knebelia , represents a juvenile specimen of Cycleryon
propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822).
Family Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874
Genus Palaeopentacheles v. Knebel, 1907
Type species: Eryon roettenbacheri Miinster, 1839
Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Miinster, 1839)
Fig. 11, PI. IX, PI. XVII (fig. 5), PI. XVIII (figs. 1, 2, 3, 4)
1839 -Eryon Rottenbacheri Miinster; p. 13, PI. 7 (fig. 10)
1 848 - Eryon Rottenbacheri Miinster in Bronn; p. 468
1852 - Eryon Rottenbacheri Miinster in Quenstedt; p. 267
1853 - Eryon Redenbacheri Miinster in Frischmann; p. 27
1856 - Eryon Redenbacheri Miinster in v. Meyer; p. 49, PI. 9 (figs.
1-3)
1862 - Eryon Redenbacheri Miinster in Oppel; p. 18, PI. 3 (figs. 6-7)
1904 - Eryon Redenbacheri Miinster in Peiser; p. 43
1904 -Eryon Redenbacheri Munster in Walther; p. 173
1907 - Palaeopentacheles Redenbacheri (Munster) in v. Knebel; p.
226, Text-fig. 2
1924 - Eryon Redenbacheri Miinster in Balss; p. 181, Text-fig. 9
1925 - Palaeopentacheles Redenbacheri (Munster) in Van Straelen;
p. 124
1929 - Palaeopentacheles Redenbacheri (Munster) in Glaessner; p. 299
1969 - Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster) in Glaessner; R
471, Text-fig. 275/2
1969 - Palaeopentacheles redenbacheri (Munster) in Malz; p. 298,
Text-fig. 5
1 969 - Palaeopentacheles redenbacheri (Munster) in Forster; p. 47
1994 - Palaeopentacheles redenbacheri (Munster) in Frickhinger; p.
122, Fig. 220
1994- Palaeopolycheles longipes (Fraas) in Frickhinger; p. 122, Fig. 22 1
2001 - Palaeopolycheles roettenbacheri (Miinster) in Dietl & Sch-
weigert; p. 71
2005b - Palaeopolycheles roettenbacheri (Munster) in Schweigert &
Garassino; p. 498
32
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
Diagnosis: carapace subrectangular ventrally flat-
tened; projecting front having two strong and elongate
teeth with serrate outer margins; lateral margins convex
and denticulate; cervical groove well marked; median
postcervical carina weak; branchial carinae strong;
median postrostral carina weak; cervical and postcervical
incisions absent; pereiopods I-IV chelate; pereiopod V
achelate; pereiopod I larger and stronger than pereiopods
II-V; pereiopods successively shorter posteriorly; uropo-
dal exopod without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS I 993 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 3, fìg.
6), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 20 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: six from thè Reden-
bacher collection and 14 from thè collection of thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich. We studied four specimens of this originai
sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we iden-
tified two specimens, illustrated by v. Meyer (1856) and
two specimens, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè
list of thè specimens, studied by Meyer and Oppel:
BSPG AS I 991 - v. Meyer (1856), PI. 9 (fìg. 2)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS I 992 - v. Meyer (1856), PI. 9 (fìg. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 5 cm
BSPG AS I 989 - Oppel (1862), PI. 3 (fìg. 7)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS I 993 - Oppel (1862), PI. 3 (fìg. 6)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
Description. Small-sized eryonid with densely tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subrectangular ventrally flattened.
Projecting front having two strong and elongate teeth with
serrate outer margins. Cervical and postcervical incisions
absent. Ocular incision deep located anteriorly. Cervical
groove well marked. Median postcervical carina weak
and tuberculate. Branchial carinae strong and tuberculate.
Median postrostral carina weak. Lateral margins convex
and denticulate. Posterior margin strongly convex. Dorsal
surface densely tuberculate.
Abdomen. Somite I subrectangular smaller than thè
others. Somites II-VI subrectangular of equal length and
with finely tuberculate dorsal surface. Pleurae pointed
and tuberculate. Somites II-VI with a strongly raised
median tergal carina, hearing a strong spine on each
pleura directed backward. Somites II-V with a strong
spine directed outward partially to cover each pleura.
Telson laceolate with two submedian tuberculate carinae
strongly raised, one strong basai spine, and tridentate
distai extremity. Protopod subsquare. Uropodal endopod
subrectangular with a strong longitudinal median carina.
Uropodal exopod subrectangular with one small spine in
thè middle of thè lateral margin and without diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Antennular articles thin of
which thè distai one carries two short multiarticulate
flagella of equal length. Antennal articles short and stout
ot which thè distai one carries a thin multiarticulate flag-
ellum. Scaphocerite spatolate with a row of small spine
along outer margin.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I with slender and
elongate merus with a row of small spines along thè lower
margin and strong propodus with upper and lower margins
hearing small tubercles. Chela of pereiopod I with slender
and pointed fixed finger and movable finger curved dis-
tally. Inner margins of movable and fixed fingers with
strong teeth increasing in size distally. Surface of merus,
carpus, propodus, movable, and fixed fingers tuberculate.
Pereiopods II-IV with small chelae of equal length. Perei¬
opods V shorter than thè others and achelate.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods not preserved.
Discussion. V. Knebel (1907) established thè new
genus Palaeopentacheles with thè type species P. roet-
tenbacheri (Miinster, 1839) from thè Upper Jurassic
(Tithonian) of Germany.
Recently, thè discovery of P. starri by Schweitzer
& Feldmann (2001) from thè Oligocene of Washington
(United States) largely expands thè geographic and strati¬
graphic range of this genus.
Family Palinuridae Latreille, 1802
Genus Palinurina Miinster, 1839
Type species: Palinurina longipes Miinster, 1839
Included species: Palinurina longipes Miinster, 1839;
Palinurina tenera Oppel, 1862
Palinurina longipes Miinster, 1839
Fig. 12, PI. XVIII (fig. 5), PI. IXX (fig. 1)
1839 - Palinurina longipes Miinster; p. 37, PI. 14 (fig. 8)
1839 - Palinurina intermedia Miinster; p. 37, PI. 14 (figs. 9,10?), PI.
29 (Fig. 8), nov. syn.
1 839 - Palinurina pygmea Miinster; p. 38, PI. 14 (fig. 11), nov. syn.
1862 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Oppel; p. 86, PI. 24 (fig. 1)
1 862 - Palinurina pygmea Miinster in Oppel; p. 87, PI. 24 (fig. 2)
1 873 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Seebach; p. 345
1873 - Palinurina tenera Oppel in Seebach; p. 345
1889 - Palinurina pygmea Miinster in Oppenheim; p. 718
1904 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Walther; p. 174
1904 - Palinurina pygmea Miinster in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Van Straelen; p. 223
1929 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Glaessner; p. 301
1969 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Glaessner; R 474, Text-fig.
277/6
1973 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Forster; p. 38, Text-Figs. 4-7
1994 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Frickhinger; p. 125, Fig. 222
2001 - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Dietl & Schweigert; p. 71
2005b - Palinurina longipes Miinster in Schweigert & Garsssino; p. 498
Diagnosis: carapace subrectangular ventrally flat¬
tened; rostrum short, shorter than supraorbital spine;
cervical and postcervical grooves deep; hepatic and
branchiocardiac grooves thin and weak; supraorbital and
antennal spines well developed; suborbitai spine small;
abdomen longer than carapace; pereiopod I shorter and
stronger than pereiopods II-V; well-developed articles of
thè antennae; very elongate flagellum of antennae; uropo¬
dal exopod without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS V 46 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 24, fig.
1), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palàon¬
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
I
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
33
Our studies revealed that Palinurìna intermedia from
Solnhofen and figured by Miinster (1839 - PI. 14, figs.
9-10) is synonym with Palinurina longipes , as discussed
below. The specimen, BSPG AS VII 768, is thè lectotype
of Miinster’s species, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa-
mmlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Our studies revealed that Palinurina pygmea from
Solnhofen and figured by Miinster (1839 - PI. 14, fig. 11)
is synonym with Palinurina longipes , as discussed below.
This specimen, BSPG AS I 996, is thè lectotype of Miin-
ster’s species, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
tur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (upper Kim-
meridgian - Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 28 specimens
belonging to this species, so divided: six from thè Reden-
bacher collection and 22 from thè collection of thè Bay¬
erische Staatssammlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie
in Munich. We studied two specimens of this originai
sample, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich in which we iden-
tified one specimen, illustrated by Miinster (1839) and
one specimen, illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè
list of thè specimens, studied by Miinster and Oppel:
BSPG AS V 47 - Miinster (1839), PI. 14 (fig. 8)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
BSPG AS V 46 - Oppel (1862), PI. 24 (fig. 1)
- length of thè specimen: 4 cm
Miinster (1839) reported a sample of three specimens
which he assigned to Palinurina intermedia. We studied of
this originai sample two specimens, housed in thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung fìir Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich illustrated by Miinster (1839). We report thè cata-
logue number of thè two specimens, studied by Miinster:
BSPG AS VII 767 - Miinster (1839), PI. 14 (fig. 10)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
BSPG AS VII 768 - Miinster (1839), PI. 14 (fig. 9)
- length of thè specimen: 3 cm
Oppel (1862) reported a sample of 48 specimens
which he assigned to Palinurina pygmea Miinster, 1839,
so divided: 12 from thè Redenbacher collection and 36
from thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung
tur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich. We studied of
this originai sample one specimen, housed in thè Bayer¬
ische Staatssammlung tur Palàontologie und Geologie in
Munich illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè cata-
logue number of thè specimen, studied by Oppel:
BSPG AS I 996 - Oppel (1862), PI. 24 (fig. 2)
- length of thè specimen: 2 cm
One specimen (n. cat. 0315 - Wulf collection) was
used to describe thè carapace which was poorly preserved
in thè originai sample.
Description. Small-sized palinurid with finely tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subrectangular ventrally flat-
tened, something missing. Rostrum short, shorter than thè
supraorbital spines. A ridge of two/three spines directed
forward thè supraorbital spine. Antennal spine well devel-
oped, longer than thè supraorbital spine. A ridge of three
spines directed forward thè antennal spine. Suborbitai
spine small, forming a ridge with other two small spines
directed forward thè ocular incision. Postcervical and cer-
vical grooves deep. Hepatic and branchiocardiac grooves
thin and weak. Two rows of small tubercles extend par¬
afici on thè median dorsal line of carapace, between thè
postcervical and branchiocardiac grooves.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI of equal length. Somites II-
V with denticulated margins and with a sharp terminal
spine. Tergal and pleural surfaces with small tubercles.
Telson subrectangular with rounded distai extremity and
with a short spine located in thè median part of lateral
margin. Uropodal endopod, exopod, and telson of equal
length. Uropodal endopod and exopod with rigid and flex-
ible portions. Uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Antennular articles thin of
which thè proximal one is longer than thè other two.
Antennal articles strong and stout with denticulate lateral
margins. Antennal flagellum can exceed five time thè
length of thè body.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I shorter and stronger
than pereiopods II-V. Segments of pereiopods I-V with
small tubercles arranged in parallel rows.
Abdominal appendages. Pleopods with an unseg-
mented peduncle which carries two elongate multiarticu-
late flagella.
Discussion. Palinurina Miinster, 1839, belongs to thè
family Palinuridae Latreille, 1802, known from thè Upper
Triassic with Archaeopalinurus Pinna, 1974, from thè
Norian of Cene (Bergamo, N Italy) (Pinna, 1974). Three
genera belong to this family from thè Jurassic: Astacodes
Bell, 1863 (Germany, Slovakia - Kimmeridgian), Pa-
laeopalinurus Bachmayer, 1954 (Germany - Tithonian),
and Palinurina Miinster, 1839 (England - Sinemurian/
Toarcian; Germany - Tithonian). Five genera belong to
this family from thè Cretaceous: Astacodes Bell, 1863
(Europe, United States, Australia - Turonian/Santonian),
Eurycarpus Schliiter, 1 868 (Germany - Senonian), Jasus
Parker, 1 883 (Lebanon - Cenomanian), Linuparus White,
1847 (Germany, England, France, Canada, Antarctic
Peninsula, United States, Mexico and New Zealand
- Turonian/Campanian), and Palinurus Weber, 1795
(Italy -Albian; Germany, Lebanon - Turonian/Senonian).
Finally, three genera belong to this family from thè Ceno-
zoic: Archaeocarabus McCoy, 1849 (England - Lute-
tian), Jasus Parker, 1883 (New Zealand - Oligocene), and
Justitia Holthuis, 1946 (Italy - Lutetian).
Among thè above mentioned genera, Palinurina Miin-
ster, 1 839, strongly resembles, for thè generai shape of thè
body, Archaeopalinurus. However, if we examine more
deeply thè two forms, it is possible to point out some mor-
phological differences that justify thè separation into two
different genera. If we compare our specimens with thè
reconstruction available in thè litterature, particularly that
concemig A levis (Pinna, 1974 - PI. 15, fig. 3; Garassino
& Teruzzi, 1993 - Fig. 33) we can notice remarkable
differences in thè shape and in thè omamentation of thè
tail fan, in thè length of pereiopods (thè II and thè IV are
longer than thè others in A. levis, while II-V have equal
length in P. longipes), in thè length of thè antennal flagel¬
lum which is five time longer than thè body in thè German
species. Other diagnostic differences appear to be seen
in thè morphology and omamentation of thè antennal
peduncles and of thè carapace, but thè latter is too poorly
preserved in A. levis to be sure about that.
Palinurina longipes Miinster, 1839, was thè subject
of a review by Forster (1973). Today, Palinurina, known
from thè Sinemurian to thè Tithonian (Lower-Upper
34
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
Jurassic) of Europe (England and Germany), includes two
species, P. longipes and P. tenera (see next description).
Miinter (1839) described Paìinurina intermedia
on some morphological characters different to those
observed in thè other species of thè same genus, in partic-
ular P. longipes : thè very elongate antennae are smooth,
lacking thè fine lateral setae, thè large thick antennal
stalk has three spiny articulations and all pereiopods are
relatively shorter and thicker than those of thè type spe¬
cies.
However Oppel (1862) reported that thè specimens
studied by Munster and labelled as P. intermedia were
extremely poorly preserved and thè generai outline of thè
body and thè pereiopods did not provide any differences
with that of P longipes, so considering Munster ’s species
as synonym with thè type species.
Munster ( 1 839) described Paìinurina pygmea on some
morphological characters different to those observed in
thè other species of thè same genus, in particular P. lon¬
gipes : thinner and shorter antennae, shorter and more
curved pereiopods and shorter abdomen. However, thè
study of thè only survived specimen, belonging to this
species, has pointed out some morphological characters,
similar to those observed in P longipes (cfr. description of
P. longipes), such as shorter and stronger pereiopod I, seg-
ments of pereiopods I-V with small tubercles arranged in
two parallel rows and antennal articles with small tuber¬
cles and spiny lateral margins. Therefore, w e consider P.
pygmea as synonym of P. longipes, type species of this
genus on thè basis of thè above mentioned morphological
characters, common between thè two species. Probably,
thè specimens belonging to P pygmea, gathered by Mun¬
ster in thè same species on thè basis of thè same size, were
juvenile stages of P. longipes.
Paìinurina tenera Oppel, 1 862
PI. IXX (figs. 2, 3)
1862 - Paìinurina tenera Oppel; p. 86, PI. 23 (fig. 4)
1 873 - Paìinurina tenera Oppel in Seebach; p. 345
1889 - Paìinurina tenera Oppel in Oppenheim; p. 718
1904 - Paìinurina tenera Oppel in Walther; p. 1 74
2005b - Paìinurina tenera Oppel in Schweigert & Garassino; p. 498
The poor state of preservation of thè originai incom¬
plete specimen by Oppel has led to thè research of new
specimens from private collections in order to emend
thè morphological description of Paìinurina tenera. One
specimen (n. cat. SMNS 65476 - Frattigiani collection)
preserved in ventral view allowed recognition of some
morphological characters in order to deepen thè descrip¬
tion of this species. However, thè preservation in ventral
view of Frattigiani ’s specimen did not pennit description
of thè carapace and tail fan.
Diagnosis: abdomen longer than carapace; pereiopod
1 shorter and stronger than pereiopods II-V; articles of thè
antennae well developed; flagellum of antennae short;
uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Lectotype: BSPG AS I 995 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 23, fig.
4), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàon-
tologie und Geologie in Munich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Eichstàtt.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported 25 specimens
belonging to this species and belonging to thè collection
of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich. We know of this originai sample one
specimen and illustrated by Oppel (1862). We report thè
catalogue number of thè specimen, studied by Oppel:
BSPG AS I 995 - Oppel (1862), PI. 23 (fig. 4)
- incomplete specimen
Description. Small-sized palinurid with fìnely tuber-
culate exoskeleton.
Carapace. Not preserved.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI of equal length. Somites II-
V with denticulated margins and with a sharp terminal
spine. Tergal and pleural surfaces with small tubercles.
Uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Antennular articles thin of which
thè proximal one is longer than thè other two. Antennal
articles strong and stout with smooth lateral margins.
Antennal flagellum as long as thè length of thè body.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I shorter and stronger
than pereiopods II- V. Segments of pereiopods I-V with
rare small tubercles not arranged in parallel rows.
Abdominal appendages. Not preserved.
Discussion. Oppel (1862) justified thè difference of
P. tenera from thè type species based upon two morpho¬
logical characters: thè antennal flagellum which is shorter
than that of P longipes and thè pereiopods that are longer
than those of thè type species. Even though it is difficult
to compare thè two species for their rarity, we are able
to confimi thè systematic validity of Oppel’s species not
only by thè above-mentioned characters, but also for
thè antennal articles which have smooth lateral margins
(denticulate in thè type species) and for thè segments of
pereiopods I-V with rare small tubercles not arranged in
parallel rows (many tubercles arranged instead in parallel
rows in thè type species).
Family Cancrinidae Beurlen, 1930
Genus Cancrinos Munster, 1839
Type species: Cancrinos claviger Munster, 1839
Cancrinos claviger Munster, 1839
Fig. 12, PI. X, PI. IXX (fig. 4), PI. XX (figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
1839 - Cancrinos claviger Munster; p. 43, PI. 15 (fig. 1)
1839 - Cancrinos latipes Munster; p. 44, PI. 15 (fig. 2), nov. syn.
1862 - Cancrinus claviger Munster in Oppel; p. 88, PI. 24 (fig. 3)
1862 - Cancrinus latipes Munster in Oppel; p. 88, PI. 24 (fig. 4)
1904 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Walther; p. 174
1904 - Cancrinos latipes Munster in Walther; p. 174
1925 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Van Straelen; p. 226, Text-fig.
108
1929 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Glaessner; p. 109
1929 - Cancrinos latipes Munster in Glaessner; p. 109
1969 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Glaessner; R 475, Text-fig.
280/2
1994 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Frickhinger; p. 115, Figs. 193-
194
1999 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Frickhinger; p. 42, Fig. 66
1999 - Cancrinos latipes Munster in Frickhinger; p. 42, Fig. 67
2006 - Cancrinos claviger Munster in Garassino & Schweigert; p. 75
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
35
This species is very rare in thè lithographic lime-
stone and usually thè specimens are not well preserved.
However, we were able to give its diagnosis and morpho-
logical description by thè identification of some morpho-
logical characters of carapace, abdomen, pereiopods, and
cephalic appendages in thè originai specimens of this spe¬
cies. Moreover, one specimen (BSPG 1975 IX 13) housed
in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fur Palàontologie und
Geologie in Munich was used to describe for thè fìrst time
thè shape of thè abdominal somites and tail fan, not pre¬
served in thè originai sample.
Diagnosis: carapace subrectangular ventrally flat-
tened; rostrum absent; cervical groove deep; abdomen as
long as carapace; pereiopod I shorter and stronger than
pereiopods II-V; petaloid flagellimi of thè antennae strong
and stout; uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Neotype: BSPG AS I 998 (Oppel, 1862 - PI. 24, figs.
5, 6), housed in thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fiir Pala-
ontologie und Geologie in Munich. According to Munster
(1839) thè holotype was purchased by Prof. v. Breda from
Leiden. Today thè specimen seems to be lost, because
it was not traceable either in thè Teyler’s Museum in
Harlem, or in thè British Naturai History Museum in
London, where specimens of v. Breda collection is said
to be housed.
Our studies revealed that Cancrinos latipes from
Moritzbrunn near Eichstàtt and figured by Munster (1839
- PI. 15, fig. 2) is synonym with Cancrinos claviger, as
discussed below. This specimen, BSPG AS VII 769, is thè
holotype of Miinster’s species, housed in thè Bayerische
StaatssammlungfurPalàontologieundGeologieinMunich.
Stratigraphic range: Upper Jurassic (Tithonian).
Type locality: Solnhofen.
Material: Oppel (1862) reported three specimens
belonging to this species and belonging to thè collec¬
tion of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung tur Palàontologie
und Geologie in Munich where, today, they are stili pre¬
served.
BSPG AS I 997 - Oppel (1862), PI. 24 (fìg. 3)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
BSPG AS I 998 - Oppel (1862), PI. 24 (figs. 5, 6)
- incomplete specimen
BSPG AS I 999 - Oppel (1862), PI. 24 (fig. 4)
- length of thè specimen: 10 cm
Munster (1839) reported one specimen which he
assigned to Cancrinos latipes Munster, 1839, belonging
to thè collection of thè Bayerische Staatssammlung fìir
Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich where, today, it is
stili preserved.
BSPG AS VII 769 - Munster (1839), PI. 15 (fig. 2)
- incomplete specimen
Description. Large palinurid with strongly tubercu-
late exoskeleton.
Carapace. Carapace subrectangular ventrally flat-
tened. Rostrum absent. Cervical groove deep, located in
thè median part. Posterior margin strengthened by a thin
marginai carina.
Abdomen. Somites I-VI subrectangular of equal
length. Pointed pleurae with a strong, sharp tooth and
denticulate margin. Telson subrectangular with rounded
distai extremity. Uropodal endopod and exopod with
rigid and flexible portions. Rigid portion of exopod finely
tuberculate. Uropodal exopod without diaeresis.
Cephalic appendages. Antennular flagella thin and
elongate. Antennal articles strong and stout with denticu¬
late lateral margins. Antennal flagellum short and petaloid
with 22 segments narrowing distally.
Thoracic appendages. Pereiopod I shorter and stronger
than pereiopods II-V with a strong and stout dactylus.
Upper and lower margins of I-V strengthened by a row of
strong spines directed forward.
Abdominal appendages. Not preserved.
Discussion. Today, Cancrinos Munster, 1839, known
only from thè Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) of Germany
includes just one species, C. claviger , very rare in thè
lithographic limestone. Recently, thè new species C.
libanensis has been recorded from thè Cenomanian of
Lebanon, extending thè stratigraphic range of this genus
(Garassino & Schweigert, 2006).
Oppel (1862), revising thè two species distinguished
by Munster (1839), C. claviger and C. latipes, used as
diagnostic character thè different number of segments of
thè antennal flagellum. In fact, thè author pointed out that
thè antennal flagellum had 15 or 16 segments in C. clavi¬
ger, while it had 18 segments in C. latipes. In reality, thè
study of thè originai specimens of thè two species pointed
out that thè antennal flagellum exhibits thè same number
of segments (ca. 22 in all), as also confirmed by thè study
of new specimens, housed in thè Bayerische Staatssa¬
mmlung tur Palàontologie und Geologie in Munich, in
which thè number of segments is included between 21
and 23, thè exact number not easily countable because of
thè telescoping in thè distai part of thè flagellum. More¬
over, thè pereiopod I is shorter than thè others in both
species. Finally, we consider C. claviger as type species
of Cancrinos because thè most important diagnostic char¬
acters that identify thè genus are preserved in thè originai
specimens of this species.
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
Eryma modestiforme
Palaeastacus fuciformis
7,
Fig. 8 - Summarizing figure ot thè astacideans preserved in Solnhofen fauna, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
37
Etallonia longimana
Fig. 9 - Summarizing figure of thè astacideans and thalassinideans preserved in Solnhofen fauna, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GONTER SCHWEIGERT
Cycleryon propinquus
Cycleryon orbiculatus
Cycleryon elongatus
Fig. 10 - Summarizing figure of palinurids preserved in Solnhofen fauna, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
Eryon arctiformis
Fig. 1 1 - Summarizing figure of palinurids preserved in Solnhofen fauna, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
40
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GONTER SCHWEIGERT
Palinurina longipes
Cancrinos claviger
Fig. 12 - Summarizing figure of palinurids preserved in Solnhofen fauna, line drawing (F. Fogliazza).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank M. Nose, Bayerische Staatssa-
mmlung fur Palaontologie und Geologie, Munich, for
permitting study of thè historic decapod collection, A.
Ross, Department of Palaeontology, Naturai History
Museum, London, for permitting study of thè holotype
of Eryon oppeli, C. Neumann, Museum tur Naturkunde
der Humboldt-Universitàt, Berlin, for thè pictures of thè
holotypes of thè Schlotheim collection, T. Jellinek, For-
schungsinstitut and Naturmuseum Senckenberg (Frank¬
furt am Main) for thè picture of thè holotype of Eryon
schuberti, N. Hauschke, Halle/Saale for searching for thè
holotypes of Mecochirus bajeri and Eryma leptodacty-
lina, M. Wulf, H. Tischlinger, P. Riidel and R. Frattigiani
for permitting study of some specimens of their private
collections, R. M. Feldmann, Geology Department, Kent
State University (Ohio) and G. Teruzzi, Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale di Milano, for thè useful advice in thè
draft of thè manuscript, careful review and criticism.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
41
REFERENCES
Albrecht H., 1983 - Die Protoastacidae n. farri., fossile Vorfahren
der Flupkrebse? Neues Jahrbuch fiir Geologie und Palàontogie,
Monatshefte, Stuttgart, 1983 (1): 5-15.
Arkell W., 1933 - The Jurassic System in Great Britain. London.
Bachmayer F., 1 954 - Palaeopalinurus glaessneri n. g. n. sp. aus dem
Oberjura-Kalk von Stramberg in Màhren. Neues Jahrbuch fiir
Geologie und Palàontologie, Abhandlungen, Stuttgart, 99 (2):
147-152.
Ball H. W., 1960 - Upper Cretaceous Decapoda and Serpulidae from
James Ross Island, Graham Land. Falkland Islands Dependencies
Survey, 24: 1-30.
Balss H., 1 924 - Studien an fossilen Decapoden. IL Palàontologische
Zeitschrift, Berlin, 6: 174-184.
Barthel K. W., 1978 - Solnhofen. Ein Blick in die Erdgeschichte. Ott,
Thun.
Bell Th., 1850 - Notes on thè Crustacea of thè Chalk Formation. In:
The Geology and fossils of thè Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations
of Sussex. Dixon F. (ed.). Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans,
London: 344-345.
Bell Th., 1863 - A monograph of thè fossil malacostracous Crustacea
of Great Britain. Part IL Crustacea of thè Gault and Greensand.
Palaentological Society, London, 14: 1-40.
Beurlen K., 1928 - Die Decapoden des Schwàbischen Jura mit
Ausnahme der aus den oberjurassischen Plattenkalken stammenden.
Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 70: 115-278.
Beurlen K., 1930 - Vergleichende Stammesgeschichte. Grundlagen,
Methoden, Probleme unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung der
hòheren Krebse. Fortschritte der Geologie und Palàontologie,
Berlin, 8: 317-586.
Beurlen K., 1933 - Crustacea Decapoda aus den Tendaguruschichten.
Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, suppl. 7, 2: 89-94.
Beurlen K. & Glaessner M. F., 1930 - Systematik der Crustacea
Decapoda auf stammesgeschichtlicher Grundlage. Zoologisches
Jahrbuch, Jena, 60: 49-84.
Bòhm J., 1911 - Callianassa Burckhardti n. sp. nebst einer
Zusammenstellung der fossilen Arten der Gattung Callianassa.
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, 63:
37-46.
Bronn H. G., 1837 - Lethaea Geognostica. 2nd edition. Stuttgart.
Bronn H. G., 1 848 - Index Palaeontologicus. Schweizerrbart, Stuttgart.
Bronn H. G., 1853 - Lethaea Geognostica. Bronn H. G. & Roemer F.
(1852) (ed.). 3rd edition. Stuttgart, 2 (5).
Carter J., 1886 - On thè Decapod Crustaceans of thè Oxford Clay.
Quar ter ly Journal of thè Geological Society, London, 42: 542-559.
Carter J., 1 898 - A contribution to thè Palaeontology of thè decapod
crustacea of England. Quarterly Journal of thè Geological Society,
London, 54: 15-44.
Chong G. & Forster R., 1976 - Chilenophoberus atacamensis, a new
decapod crustacean from thè Middle Oxfordian of thè Cordillera
de Domeyko, northem Chile. Neues Jahrbuch fiir Geologie
und Palàontologie, Monatshefte, Stuttgart, 1976 (3): 145-156.
Collins J. S. H. & Rasmussen H. W., 1992 - Upper Cretaceous-Lower
Tertiary decapod crustaceans from West Greenland. Gronlands
Geologiske Undersogelse, Copenhagen, 162: 5-46.
Crónier C. & Courville P., 2004 - A rich and higly endemie decapod
crustacean fauna from thè Middle Jurassic of North-East France.
Palaeontology, Oxford, 47 (4): 999-1014.
Dacqué E., 1934 - Wirbellose des Jura. In: Leitfossilien. Gùrich G.
(ed.). Borntraeger, Berlin, 7 (2): 273-582.
Damborenea S. E. & Mancenido M. O., 1987 - Primer Glypheidae
(Crustacea, Decapoda) de America del Sur en el Toarciano de la
Provincia de Mendoza, Argentina. Notas del Museo de la Piata, La
Piata, 21 (106): 49-65.
Dana J. D., 1852 - Crustacea. United States Exploring Expedition
during years 1838-1842, under thè command of Charles Wilkes,
U. S. N„ 13: 1-1620.
Desmarest A. G., 1 822 - Les Crustacès proprement dits. F. G. Levraut,
Paris.
Dietl G., Kapitzke M. & Rieter M., 1995 - Neue Grabungen im
Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Weif3er Jura £, Ober-Kimmeridgium)
der stidwestlichen Schwàbischen Alb - ein Zwischenbericht.
Jahreshefte des Vereins fiir vaterlàndische Naturkunde in
Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart, 151: 107-126.
Dietl G., Dietl O., Kapitzke M., Rieter M., Schweigert G., Ilg A. &
Hugger R., 1997 - Der Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Weiper Jura C, ).
Grabungskampagne 1 996. Jahreshefte der Gesellschaft Naturkunde
in Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart, 153: 185-203.
Dietl G. & Schweigert G., 2001 - Im Reich der Meerengel - Der
Nusplinger Plattenkalk und seine Fossilien. Pfeil, Munich.
Dollfus A., 1863 - La faune kimmeridienne du Cap de la Hève. Essai
d’une revision paléontologique. Paris.
Dumortier, E. 1864-1874 - Etudes paléontologiques sur les dépots
jurassiques dans le bassin du Rhóne. 4 voi.
Engel T., 1908 - Geognostischer Wegweiser durch Wiirttemberg. 3rd
edition. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
Etallon A., 1859 - Description des Crustacès de la Haute-Saine et du
Haut-Jura. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, Paris, sér.
2, 16(1858): 169-205.
Etallon A., 1861 - Notes sur les Crustacès Jurassiques du bassin du
Jura. Mémoires de la Société d’Agriculture, Sciences et Lettres de
Haute Saóne,9: 129-171.
Etheridge R., 1 9 1 4 - The genus Enoploclytia in thè Cretaceous rocks of
Queensland. Records of thè Australian Museum, 10: 271-273.
Feldmann R. M., 1979 - Eryma foersteri, a new species of lobster
(Decapoda) from thè Jurassic (Callovian) of North America.
American Museum Novitates, New York, 2668: 1-6.
Feldmann R. M. & Saint Laurent M. de, 2002 - Glyphea foresti n. sp.
(Decapoda) from thè Cenomanian of Northem Territory, Australia.
Crustaceana, Leiden, 75 (3-4): 359-373.
Feldmann R. M. & Titus A. L., 2006 - Eryma jungostrix n. sp.
(Decapoda; Erymidae) from thè Redwater Shale Member of
thè Stump Formation (Jurassic; Oxfordian) of Utah. Journal of
Crustacean Biology, 26 (1): 63-68.
Forest J. & Saint Laurent M. de, 1981 - La morphologie exteme de
Neoglyphea inopinata, espèce actuelle de Crustacé Décapode
Glyphéide. Résultats des Campagnes Musorstom. 1. Mémoires
Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 91 : 51-84.
Forest J. & Saint Laurent M. de, 1989 - Nouvelle contribution à la
connaissance de Neoglyphea inopinata Forest & de Saint Laurent,
à propos de la description de la femelle adulte. In: Résultats des
Campagnes Musorstom. 5. Forest J. (ed.). Mémoires Muséum
national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, sér. A, 144: 75-92.
Forster R., 1965 - Dekapoden der Neuburger Bankkalke (Mittel-
Tithon) von Neuburg an der Donau. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen
Staatssammlung fiir Palàontologie und historische Geologie,
Miinchen, 5: 137-149.
Forster R., 1966 - Ùber die Erymiden, eine alte konservative Familie
der mesozoischen Dekapoden. Palaeontographica, Stuttgart, 125:
61-175.
Forster R., 1967 - Zur Kenntnis natanter Jura-Dekapoden. Mitteilungen
der Bayerischen Staatssammlung fiir Palàontologie und histo-
rischen Geologie, Miinchen, 7: 157-174.
Forster R., 1969 - Epòkie, Entòkie, Parasitismus und Regeneration bei
fossilen Dekapoden. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung
fiir Palàontologie und historische Geologie, Miinchen, 9: 45-59.
Forster R., 1971 - Die Mecochiridae, eine spezialisierte Familie der
mesozoischen Glypheoidea (Crustacea, Decapoda). Neues Jahr¬
buch fiir Geologie und Palàontologie, Abhandlungen, Stuttgart,
137: 396-421.
Forster R., 1973 - Untersuchungen an oberjurassischen Palinuridae
(Crustacea, Decapoda). Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssa¬
mmlung fiir Palàontologie und historische Geologie, Miinchen,
13: 31-46.
Forster R., 1977 - Untersuchungen an jurassischen Thalassinoidea
(Crustacea, Decapoda). Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssa¬
mmlung fiir Palàontologie und historische Geologìe, Miinchen,
17: 137-156.
Forster R. & Hillebrandt A., 1984 - Das Kimmeridge des Profeta-Jura
in Nordchile mit einer Mecochirus-Favreina-NergeseUschafìung
(Crustacea, Decapoda - Ichnogenus). Mitteilungen der Bayerischen
Staatssammlung fiir Palàontologie und historische Geologie,
Miinchen, 24: 67-84.
Forster R. & Rieber H., 1982 - Der àlteste Vertreter der Gattung
Palaeoastacus (Crustacea, Decapoda), Palaeoastacus argoviensis
n.sp., aus dem unteren Dogger der Nordschweiz. Eclogae
geologicae Helvetiae, Basel, 75 (3): 773-778.
42
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
Fraas O., 1855 - Beitrage zum obersten weissen Jura in Schwaben.
Jahreshefte des Vereins fur vaterlàndische Naturkunde in
Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart, 1 1 : 76-107.
Fraas O., 1878 - Geologisches aus dem Libanon. Jahreshefte des
Vereins fur vaterlàndische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg, Stuttgart,
34: 257-391.
Frentzen K., 1937 - Palaontologische Notizen aus den Badischen
Landessammlungen fur Naturkunde. Beitrage zur naturkundlichen
Forschung in Siidwestdeutschland, Karlsruhe, 2: 100-120.
Frickhinger K. A., 1994 - Die Fossilien von Solnhofen. Korb,
Goldschneck.
Frickhinger K. A., 1999 - Die Fossilien von Solnhofen. 2 Korb,
Goldschneck.
Frischmann L., 1853 - Versuch einer Zusammenstellung der bis jetzt
bekannten Thier- und Pflanzen-Ùberreste des lithographischen
Kalkschiefers in Bayem. Ein Programm. K. Brònner, Eichstàtt.
Garassino A., 1996 - The family Erymidae Van Straelen, 1924 and thè
superfamily Glypheoidea Zittel, 1885 in thè Sinemurian of Osteno
in Lombardy (Crustacea, Decapoda). Atti della Società italiana di
Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 135 (2): 333-373.
Garassino A., 1997 - The species Glyphea tonelloi n. sp. (Crustacea,
Decapoda) in thè Lower Cretaceous (Late Barremian-Aptian) of
thè Valley of Comappo River (Udine, NE Italy). Gortania - Atti del
Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, Udine, 19: 85-93.
Garassino A., 2000 - Glyphea rigoi n. sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda) of
Dolomia di Forni (Norian, Late Triassic) of Camia (Udine, NE
Italy). Gortania - Atti del Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale,
Udine, 22: 59-64.
Garassino A., 2001 - New decapod crustaceans of thè Cenomanian
(Upper Cretaceous) of Lebanon. Atti della Società italiana di
Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 141 (2): 237-250.
Garassino A., De Angeli A. & Schweigert G., 2005 - Brachyurans from
thè Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian - Tithonian) of Pfalzpaint and
Breitenhill (Bavaria, S. Germany). Atti della Società italiana di
Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 146(1): 69-78.
Garassino A. & Schweigert G., 2004 - Cycleryon wulfi n. sp.
(Crustacea: Decapoda: Eryonidae) from thè Upper Jurassic of
Eichstàtt (Bavaria, S Germany). Atti della Società italiana di
Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 145 (2): 243-250.
Garassino A. & Schweigert G., 2006 - Cretasergestes sahelalmaensis
n. gen., n. sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestidae) and Cancrinos
libanensis n. sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palinuridae) from thè Late
Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Lebanon. Atti della Società italiana
di Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 147(1): 69-78.
Garassino A. & Teruzzi G., 1993 - A new decapod crustacean
assemblage from thè Upper Triassic of Lombardy (N. Italy).
Paleontologia Lombarda, Milano, nuova serie, 1 : 3-27.
Garassino A. & Teruzzi G., 2001 - I crostacei decapodi del Toarciano
(Giurassico inferiore) di Sogno (Bergamo, N. Italia). Atti della
Società italiana di Scienze naturali e del Museo civico Storia
naturale in Milano, Milano, 141 (2): 187-197.
Garassino A., Teruzzi G. & Dalla Vecchia F. M., 1996 — The macruran
decapod crustaceans of thè Dolomia di Forni (Norian, Upper
Triassic) of Camia (Udine, NE Italy). Atti della Società italiana di
Scienze naturali e del Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano,
Milano, 136 (1): 15-60.
Germar E. F., 1827 - Ueber die Versteinerungen von Solenhofen.
Teutschland geognostisch-geologisch dargestellt und mit Charten
und Zeichnungen erlàutert. Keferstein, Weimar, 4: 89-110.
Glaessner M. F., 1929 - Fossilium Catalogus. I: Animalia (Crustacea,
Decapoda). W. Junk, Berlin, 41: 1-464.
Glaessner M. F., 1932 - Zwei ungeniigend bekannte mesozoische
Dekapodenkrebse. Pemphix sueuri (Desm.) und Palaeophoberus
suevicus (Quenstedt). Palaontologische Zeitschrift, Berlin 14-
108-121.
Cdaessner M. F., 1945 - Cretaceous Crustacea from Mount Lebanon,
Syria. Annals and Magazine of Naturai History, London 12 (1 IV
694-707.
Glaessner M. F„ 1960 - The fossil decapod Crustacea of New Zealand
and thè evolution of thè order Decapoda. New Zealand Geological
Survey Paleontological Bulletin, Wellington, 3 1 : 1-63.
Glaessner M. F., 1965 - Vorkommen fossiler Dekapoden (Crustacea)
in Fisch-Schiefem. Senckenbergiana lethaea, Frankfurt am Main,
46a: 111-122.
Glaessner M. F., 1969 - Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part R.
Arthropoda 4 (2). Geological Society of America and University of
Kansas, Lawrence: R400-R475.
Haan W. de, 1833-1850 - Crustacea. In: Fauna Japonica, sive Descrip-
tio animalium, quae in itinere per Japoniam, jussu et auspiciis supe-
riorum, qui summum in India Batava imperium tenent, suscepto,
annis 1823-1830, collegit, notis, observationibus e adumbrationi-
bus illustravit. P. F. Siebold (ed.). Lugduni Batavorum, 1-8: 1-243.
Harbort E., 1905 - Die Fauna der Schaumburg-Lippe’schen
Kreidemulde. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Geologischen
Landesanstalt, Berlin, 45: 1-112.
Hée A., 1924 - Catalogue critique des Crustacés jurassiques du
Calvados et de TOme. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de
Normandie, Caen, 5 (7): 126-157.
Hof C. H. J., 1998 - Late Cretaceous stomatopods (Crustacea:
Malacostraca) from Israel and Jordan. Contributions to Zoology,
Amsterdam, 67 (4): 257-266.
Holthuis L. B., 1946 - The Stenopodidae, Nephropsidae, Scyllaridae
and Palinuridae. Biological Results of thè Snellius Expedition.
XIV. Temminckia, 7: 1-178.
Holl F., 1 829-1830 - Handbuch der Petrefaktenkunde. Dresden.
Huxley T. H., 1879 - The Cray-Fish, an Introduction to thè Study of
Zoology. C. Kegan & Co., London.
Kitchin F. L., 1913 - The invertebrate Fauna and palaeontological
relations of thè Uitenhage series. Annals of South African Museum,
7: 21-250.
Knebel W. von, 1907 - Die Eryoniden des oberen Weissen Jura von
Stiddeutschland. Archiv fur Biontologie, Berlin, 2 (2): 193-233.
Kònig Ch., 1825 - Icones fossilum sectiles. London.
Krause P. G., 1 89 1 - Die Dekapoden des norddeutschen Jura. Zeitschrift
der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, 43: 171-225.
Krause P. G., 1908 - Ueber Diluvium, Tertiar, Kreide und Jura in der
Heilsberger Tiefbohrung. Jahrbuch der kòniglich Preussischen
geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin, 29: 185-326.
Kriiger J. F., 1 823 - Geschichte der Urwelt. 2 (30): 312.
Kriiger J. F., 1825 - Urweltliche Naturgeschichte der organischen
Reiche. Quedlinburg.
Kuhn O., 1 93 1 - Die Tier- und Pflanzenwelt des Solnhofener Schiefers.
Mit vollstandigem Arten- und Schriftenverzeichnis. Geologica
Bavarica, Miinchen, 48: 1-68.
Kuhn O., 1961 - Die Tier- und Pflanzenwelt des Solnhofener Schiefers.
Mit vollstandigem Arten- und Schriftenverzeichnis. Geologica
Bavarica, Miinchen, 48: 1-68.
Kuhn O., 1963 - Die Tierwelt des Solnhofener Schiefers. Die Neue
Brehm-Biicherei, Wittenberg, 318: 1-36.
Latreille P. A., 1802-1803 - Histoire naturelle, génerale et particuliére,
des crustacés et des insectes. 3. F. Dufart, Paris.
Latreille P. A., 1831 - Cours d’ Entomologie, ou de Thistoire naturelle
des Crustacés, des Arachnides, des Myriapodes, et des Insectes.
Annales I. Paris.
Lahusen J., 1 894 -Ueber die russischen Krebsreste aus denjurassischen
Ablagerungen und der-unteren Wolgastufe. Verhandlungen der
Russischen Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft, St. Peters-
burg, ser. 2, 31: 313-324.
Leich H., 1 968 -Nach Millionen Jahren ans Licht. Ott, Thun & Miinchen.
Malz H., 1969 - Eryonidea und Erymidea (Crust., Decap.) aus dem
Solnhofener Plattenkalk. Senckenbergiana lethaea, Frankfurt am
Main, 50 (4): 291-301.
Mantell G., 1833 - The Geology of thè South-East of England.
London.
Martin G., 1961 - Les Crustacés décapodes du terrain à chailles du Jura
franc-comtois. Annales scientifique de l'Université de Besangon,
sèrie 2 - géologie, 14: 43-71.
Martin J. W. & Davis G. E., 2001 - An Updated Classification of thè
Recent Crustacea. Naturai History Museum of Los Angeles County,
Sciences Series, Los Angeles, 39: 1-123.
McCoy F., 1 849 - On thè classifcation of some British fossil Crustacea
with notices of new forms in thè University Collection at
Cambridge. Annals and Magazine of Naturai History, London, ser.
2,4: 161-179; 330-335.
Méchin A., 1901 - Sur quelques formes nouvelles du genre Eryma
(Astacomorpha fossiles) du Jurassique de Lorraine. Bulletin des
Séances de la Société Scientifique, Nancy, sér. 3, 2: 73-84.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
43
Meyer H. von, 1835-1838 - Briefliche Mitteilungen an Prof. Bronn.
Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und
Petrefaktenkunde, Stuttgart: 1-587.
Meyer H. von, 1836 - Beitrage zu Eryon, einem Geschlechte fossiler
langschwànziger Krebse. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae
Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae, Halle, 18 (1): 263-283.
Meyer H. von, 1840 - Briefliche Mittheilung an Prof. Bronn.
Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und
Petrefaktenkunde, Stuttgart, 1840: 1-587.
Meyer H. von, 1856 - Jurasische und Triasiche Crustaceen.
Palaeontographica, Cassel, 44-55.
Moericke W., 1889 - Die Crustaceen der Stramberger Schichten.
Palaeontographica, suppl. II, Stuttgart, 6: 43-72.
Miinster G. von, 1839 - Decapoda Macroura. Abbildung und
Beschreibung der fossilen langschwànzigen Krebse in den
Kalkschiefem von Bayem. Beitrage zur Petrefaktenkunde,
Bayreuth, 2: 1-88.
Muller A. H., 1963 - Lehrbuch der Palaozoologie, Band II,
Invertebraten, Teil 3, Arthropoda 2 - Stomochorda. Fischer, Jena.
Muller A. H., 1978 - Lehrbuch der Palaozoologie, Band II,
Invertebraten, Teil 3, Arthropoda 2 - Hemichordata (2nd ed.).
Fischer, Jena.
Oppel A., 1861 - Die Arten der Gattungen Eryma, Palaeastacus,
Magila und Etallonia. Jahreshefte des Vereins fur vaterlàndische
Naturkunde in Wurttemberg, Stuttgart, 17: 355-361.
Oppel A., 1862 - Ùber jurassische Crustaceen. Palaeontologische
Mittheilungen, Stuttgart, 1: 1-120.
Oppenheim P., 1 889 - Neue Crustaceenlarven aus dem lithographischen
Schiefer Bayems. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen
Gesellschaft, Berlin, 40: 709-719.
Parker T. J., 1883 - On thè structure of thè head in Palinurus with
special reference to thè classification of thè genus. Nature, London,
29: 189-190.
Patrulius D., 1959 - Contributions à la systematique des décapodes
neojurassiques. Academia Republicii Populare Ramane, Bucarest,
3 (2): 249-257.
Peiser G., 1904 - Beitrag zur Kenntnis der in den Kalkschiefem von
Solnhofen auftretenden Gattung Eryon und ihrer Beziehungen
zu verwandten rezenten Tiefseekrebsen. Thesis University of
Erlangen.
Pictet F. J., 1854 - Traité de Paléontologie (2nd ed.), Paris, 2.
Pinna G., 1974 - 1 Crostacei della fauna triassica di Cene in Val Seriana
(Bergamo). Memorie della Società italiana di Scienze naturali e del
Museo civico di Storia naturale in Milano, Milano, 21 (1): 7-33.
Phillips J., 1829 - Illustrations of thè Geology of Yorkshire. London.
Polz H., 1999 - Etallonia hoellorum sp. nov. (Cmstacea, Decapoda,
Axiidae) aus dem Oberkimmeridgium der sudlichen Frankenalb.
Archaeopteryx, Miinchen, 17: 33-39.
Polz H., 2000 - Glyphea viohli sp. nov. (Cmstacea: Decapoda:
Glypheidae) aus den Solnhofener Plattenkalken. Archaeopteryx,
Miinchen, 18: 17-25.
Quenstedt F. A., 1851-1852 - Handbuc’n der Petrefactenkunde (lst ed.).
Laupp, Tubingen.
Quenstedt F. A., 1856-1857 - Der Jura. Laupp, Tubingen.
Quenstedt F. A., 1 865- 1 866 - Handbuch der Petrefactenkunde (2nd ed.).
Laupp, Tubingen.
Quenstedt F. A., 1883-1885 - Handbuch der Petrefactenkunde (3rded.).
Laupp, Tubingen.
Rafinesque-Schmaltz C. S., 1815 - Analyse de la nature ou tableau de
Funivers et des corps organisés. Palermo.
Rathbun M., 1 923 - Decapod crustaceans from thè Late Cretaceous of
North Carolina. In: The Cretaceous Formation of North Carolina,
5: 403-408.
Rathbun M., 1926 - Decapoda. In: The fauna of thè Ripley Formation
on Coon Creek, Tennessee. Wade B. (ed.). United States Geological
Survey Professional Paper, Washington, 137:1 84- 191.
Rathbun M., 1935 - Fossil Cmstacea of thè Atlantic and Gulf Coastal
Plain. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper,
Washington, 2.
Rémy J. M. & Avnimelech M., 1955 - Eryon yehoachi nov. sp. et
Cenomanocarcinus cf vanstraeleni Stenzel, crustacés décapodes
du Crétacé supérieur de l’état dTsrael. Bulletin de la Société
Géologique de France, Paris, ser. 6, 5: 311-314.
Roger J., 1946 - Les invertébrés des couches a poissons du Crétacé
supérieur du Liban. Mémoire de la Société Géologique de France,
Paris, 51: 1-92.
Roll A., 1931 - Die Stratigraphie des Oberen Malm im Lauchertgebiet
(Schwàbische Alb) als Unterlage fur tektonische Untersuchungen.
Abhandlungen der Preufiischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue
Folge, Berlin, 135: 1-164.
Ròper M. & Rothgaenger M., 1998 - Die Plattenkalke von Hienheim,
Landkreis Kelheim. Eichendorf- Verlag, Eichendorf bei Landau/Isar.
Ròper M., Rothgaenger M. & Rothgaenger K., 1996 - Die Plattenkalke
von Bmnn (Landkreis Regensburg). Eichendorf-Verlag, Eichendorf
bei Landau/Isar.
Ròper M., Rothgaenger M. & Rothgaenger K., 2000 - Die Plattenkalke
von Schemfeld (Landkreis Eichstatt). Eichendorf-Verlag, Eichen¬
dorf bei Landau/Isar.
Sauvage H. E., 1891 - Note sur les Crustacés des Terrains jurassiques
supérieurs du Boulonnais. Annales des Sciences Naturelles,
Zoologie, Paris, ser. 7, 13: 83-96.
Schlotheim E. F. von, 1820 - Die Petrefactenkunde auf dem
jetzigen Standpunkte durch die Beschreibung seiner Sammlung
versteinerter und fossiler Uberreste des Thier- und Pflanzenreichs
der Vorwelt erlàutert. Becker, Gotha.
Schlotheim E. F. von, 1822 - Nachtrage zur Petrefactenkunde, Becker,
Gotha, 1: 1-100.
Schliiter C., 1868 - In: Von der Marck K. & Schliiter C., Neue Fische
und Krebse aus der Kreide von Westphalen. Palaeontographica,
Stuttgart, 15: 269-305.
Schweigert G., 2001a- Dimorphismus bei Krebsen der Gattung Cycler-
yon (Decapoda, Eryonidae) aus dem Oberjura Siiddeutschlands.
Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 305: 1-12.
Schweigert G., 200 lb - Eine neue Art der Gattung Antrimpos Miinster
(Cmstacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) aus dem Nusplinger Plattenkalk
(Oberjura, Ober-Kimmeridgium, SW-Deutschland). Stuttgarter
Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 307: 1-33.
Schweigert G., 200 le - The late Jurassic decapod species Aeger
tipularius (Schlotheim, 1822) (Cmstacea: Decapoda: Aegeridae).
Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 309: 1-10.
Schweigert G., 2002 - Zwei neue Gamelen (Decapoda: Dendro-
branchiata, Eukyphida) aus obeijurassischen Plattenkalken
Siiddeutschelands. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B,
Stuttgart, 323: 1-11.
Schweigert G., 2003 - Megachela frickhingeri n. g. n. sp. (Cmstacea:
Decpoda: Thalassinoidea: Axiidae) aus dem Solnhofener Plat¬
tenkalk (Ober-Jura, Bayem). Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde,
ser. B, Stuttgart, 333: 1-12.
Schweigert G., 2004a - Raritàt im Solnhofener Plattenkalk. Fossilien,
Wiebelsheim, 2004 (2): 70.
Schweigert G., 2004b - Raritàt im Solnhofener Plattenkalk - ein erster
Sucherfolg! Fossilien, Wiebelsheim, 2004 (6): 329.
Schweigert G. & Dietl G., 1999 - Neubeschreibung von “ Eryon
longipes O. Fraas” (Cmstacea, Decapoda, Eryonidea) aus dem
Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Ober-Kimmeridgium, Schwàbische Alb).
Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 274: 1-10.
Schweigert G., Dietl G. & Ròper M., 2000 - Die Panzerkrebse der
Familie Erymidae Van Straelen (Cmstacea, Decapoda) aus dem
Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Ober-Kimmeridgium, Schwàbische Alb)
im Vergleich mit frànkischen Vorkommen. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur
Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 285: 1-14.
Schweigert G. & Frattigiani R., 2005a - Heureka - die Rosenfeldia ist
da. Fossilien, 2005 (4): 198-199.
Schweigert G. & Frattigiani R., 2005b - Nochmals Rosenfeldia - am
Puls der Forschung. Fossilien, Wiebelsheim, 2005 (6): 328-329.
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., 2003 - Malmuncina wulfi n. g. n. sp.,
thè first uncinid decapod (Cmstacea: Decapoda: Astacidea) from
thè Late Jurassic. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B,
Stuttgart, 336: 1-8.
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., 2004 - New genera and species of
shrimps (Cmstacea: Decapoda: Dendrobranchiata, Caridea) from
thè Late Jurassic lithographic limestones of S Germany. Stuttgarter
Beitrage zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 350: 1-33.
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., 2005a - The lobster genus
Squamosoglyphea Beurlen, 1930 (Cmstacea: Decapoda:
Glypheidae) in thè Late Jurassic Lithographic Limestones
of southern Germany. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Palàontologie, Monatshefte, Stuttgart, 2005: 269-288.
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., 2005b - First record of thè shrimp
genus Carpopenaeus Glaessner, 1 945 (Cmstacea: Decapoda: Car-
popenaeidae) from thè Upper Jurassic. Neues Jahrbuch Jur Geolo¬
gie und Palàontologie, Monatshefte, Stuttgart, 2005 (8): 490-502.
44
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GONTER SCHWEIGERT
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., in press - New records of Rosenfeldia
oppeli (Woodward) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Eryonidae) from thè
Late Jurassic Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones. Neues Jahrbuch
fur Geologie und Palàontologie, Monatshefte, Stuttgart.
Schweigert G. & Garassino A., in press - The Upper Jurassic
Solnhofen decapod crustacean fauna: review of thè types from
old descriptions. Part II. Superfamily Penaeoidea and Infraorder
Caridea. Memorie della Società italiana di Scienze naturali e del
Museo civico di Storia naturale di Milano, Milano.
Schweigert G., Garassino A., Hall R. L., Hauff R. B. & Karasawa H.,
2003 - The lobster genus Uncina Quenstedt, 1851 (Crustacea:
Decapoda: Astacidea: Unicinidae) from thè Lower Jurassic.
Stuttgart er Beitràge zur Naturkunde, ser. B, Stuttgart, 332: 1-43.
Schweigert G., Garassino A. & Riou B., 2006 - First record of
Stenochirus Oppel, 1861 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Stenochiridae)
from thè Callovian (Middle Jurassic) of La Voulte sur-Rhóne.
Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palàontologie, Monatshefte,
Stuttgart, 2006 (2): 65-77.
Schweigert G., Krishna J., Pandey B. & Pathak D. B., 1996 - A new
approach to thè correlation of thè Late Kimmeridgian Beckeri
Zone across thè Tethyan Sea. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Palàontologie, Abhandlungen, Stuttgart, 202: 345-373.
Schweigert G. & Ròper M., 2001 - Neue Krebse der Gattung Palaeast-
acus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Erymidae) aus oberjurassischen Plat-
tenkalken Suddeutschlands. Stuttgarter Beitràge zur Naturkunde,
ser. B, Stuttgart, 313: 1-10.
Schweitzer C. & Feldmann R. M., 2001 - New Cretaceous and Tertiary
decapod crustaceans from western North America. Bulletin of thè
Mizunami Fossil Museum, Mizunami, 28: 173-210.
Secretan S., 1964 - Les crustacés décapodes du Jurassique supérieur et
du Crétacé de Madagascar. Mémoires Muséum national d’Histoire
naturelle, Paris, ser. C, 15: 1-224.
Seebach K. von, 1873 - Ueber fossile Phyllosomen von Solnhofen.
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, 25:
340-346.
Simpson M. I. & Middleton R., 1 985 -Gross morphology and thè mode of
life of two species of lobster from thè Lower Cretaceous of England:
Meyeria ornata (Phillips) and Meyerella magna (M’Coy). Transac¬
tion of thè Royal Society of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 76: 203-215.
Stenzel H. B., 1945 - Decapod crustaceans from thè Cretaceous of
Texas. University of Texas, Austin, 4401 : 401-476.
Taylor B. J., 1979 - Macrurous Decapoda from thè Lower Cretaceous of
South-Eastem Alexander Island. British Antarctic Survey, 8 1 : 1-39.
Tshudy D. M. & Babcock L. E., 1 997 - Morphology-based phylogenetic
analysis of thè clawed lobsters (family Nephropsidae and thè new
family Chilenophoberidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 17:
257-267.
Van Straelen V., 1922 - Les Crustacés décapodes du Callovien de
La Voulte-sur-Rhòne (Ardèche). Comptes Rendus Académie des
Sciences, Paris, 175: 982-984.
Van Straelen V. 1923 - Description de Crustacés décapodes macroures
nouveaux des Terrains secondaires. Annales de la Société royale
Zoologique et Malacologique de Belgique, Bruxelles, 53 (1922),
1923: 84-93.
Van Straelen V., 1924-1925 - Contribution a l’étude des crustacés
décapodes de la Période Jurassique. Académie Royale de Belgique,
Cl. Se., Mém., Coll. 4, ser. 2, Bruxelles, 7 (1): 1-462.
Van Straelen V., 1927 - Contribution à Tétude des Crustacées
décapodes fossiles de la Péninsule Ibérique. Eos, Revista Espanola
d Entomologia, Madrid, 3: 79-94.
Van Straelen V., 1936 - Crustacés Décapodes nouveaux ou peu
connus de l’époque crétacique. Bulletin du Musée royal d’Histoire
naturelle de Belgique, Bruxelles, 12 (45): 1-50.
Walch J. E. I., 1773 - Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen zur
Erlàuterung der Knorrischen Sammlung von Merkwiirdigkeiten
der Natur. Felfiecker, Numberg, 1: 1-187.
Walther J., 1 904 - Die Fauna der Solnhofener Plattenkalke, bionomisch
betrachtet . Jenaische Denkschriften, Jena, 11: 133-214.
Weber F., 1795 - Nomenclator entomologicus secundum entomologiam
systematicum ili. Fabricii, adjectis speciebus recens detectis et
varietatibus.
Winckler T. C., 1883 - Etudes carcinologique sur les genres Pemphix,
Glyphea et Araeosternus. Archives Musée Teyler, sér. 2, 1: 73-124.
White A., 1847 - Short descriptions of some new species of Crustacea
in thè collection of thè British Museum. Annals and Magazine of
Naturai History, London, 20 (132): 205-207.
Wood-Mason J., 1874 - On new or little-known Crustaceans. Proceed-
ings of thè Asiatic Society ofBengal, Calcutta, 63 (2): 230-232.
Woodward H., 1866 - Notes on thè species of thè genus Eryon
Desmarest, from thè Lias and Oolite of England and Bavaria.
Quarterly Journal of thè Geological Society, London, 22: 494-
502.
Woodward H., 1876 - On some New Macrurous Crustacea from thè
Kimmeridge Clay of thè Sub-Wealden Boring, Sussex, and from
Boulogne-sur-mer. Quarterly Journal of thè Geological Society,
London, 32 (1), 125: 47-50.
Woodward H., 1881 - Contribution to thè study of Fossil Crustacea.
Geological Magazine, London, 8: 529-534.
Woodward H., 1900 - Further Notes on Podophthalmous Crustaceans
from thè Upper Cretaceous Formation of British Columbia, etc.
Geological Magazine, London, new series, decade 4, 7: 433-435.
Alessandro Garassino - Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, Sezione di Paleontologia, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italia.
e-mail: a.garassino@tin.it
Gunter Schweigert - Staatliches Museum fur Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 7091 1 Stuttgart, Germany.
e-mail: schweigert.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de
1 he l pper Jurassic Solr.hoten decapod crustacean fauna: review of thè types from old descriptions. Part I.
Infraorders Astacidea, Thalassinidea, and Palinura
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume XXXIV — Fascicolo I
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
45
PI. I - 1) Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822); 2) Eryma veltheimii (MUnster, 1839); 3) Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim,
1822). Reconstructions F. Fogliazza.
46
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
pl- 11 1 * l>ustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822); 2) Pseudastacus pustulosus (Miinster, 1839). Reconstructions F. Fogliazza.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
47
PI. Ili - 1) Stenochirus angustus (Miinster, 1839); 2) Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822). Reconstructions F. Fogliazza.
48
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
1 1. 1\ 1 ) Glyphea tenuis Oppel, 1860; 2) Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Munster, 1839). Reconstructions F. Fogliazza.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
49
PI. V- 1 ) Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim, 1822); 2) Magila latimana Miinster, 1839. Reconstructions F. Fogliazza.
50
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PI. VI - Cyeleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822). Reconstruction F. Fogliazza
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
51
PI. VII -Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1822). Reconstruction F. Fogliazza.
52
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PI. Vili - Knebelia bilobata (Munster, 1839). Reconstruction F. Fogliazza
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
53
PI. IX - Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839). Reconstruction F. Fogliazza.
54
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PI. X - Cancrinos claviger Munster, 1839. Reconstruction F. Fogliazza.
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART 1
55
PI. XI - 1) Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822), holotype, n. cat. K 37 MB (MNHB) (x 2.5); 2) Eryma leptodactylina (Germar,
1827), holotype by monotypy, without catalogue number (IGH) (x 2); 3, 4) Eryma veltheimii (Munster, 1839), holotype by monotypy,
n. cat. AS VII 186 (BSPG), part and counter-part (x 0.8); 5) Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822), holotype, n. cat. K 36 MB. A
251 (MNHB) (x 1.5); 6) Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822), holotype, n. cat. K 41 MB (MNHB) (x 3).
56
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
1 4
3 6
i i. X II - 1 ) / ustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1 822), n. cat. AS Vili 78 (BSPG) (x 1 .2); 2) “ Glyphea ” verrucosa Munster, 1 839, lectotype,
n.cat. AS VII 182 (BSPG) (x2.5); 3) Pseudastacus pustulosus (Munster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS I 670 (BSPG) (x 0.6); 4) Pseu-
dashiL us muensteri Oppel, 1862, holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS I 672 (BSPG) (naturai size); 5) Stenochirus angustus (Munster,
; 839), holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS VII 322 (BSPG) (naturai size); 6) Stenochirus angustus (Munster, 1839), n. cat. 9836 (Wulf
collection) (x 0.5).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
57
PI. XIII - 1) Stenoehirus mayeri Oppel, 1862, lectotype, n. cat. AS I 673 (BSPG) (naturai size); 2) Stenochirus mayeri Oppel, 1862, n.
cat. AS I 673 (BSPG), detail of thè chela of pereiopod I (x 4); 3) Glyphea pseudoscyllarus (Schlotheim, 1822), holotype, n. cat. K 43
MB. A. 255 (MNHB) (naturai size); 4) Glyphea tenuis Oppel, 1860, holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS VIII 95 (BSPG) (naturai size);
5) Squamosoglyphea squamosa (Miinster, 1839), holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS VII 734 (BSPG) (naturai size); 6) Mecochirus
longimanatus (Schlotheim, 1822), neotype, n. cat. AS V 45 (BSPG) (x 0.3).
58
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
; ™ ' 1 ) Mecochirus brevimanus (Munster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 739 (BSPG) (x 0.7); 2) Mecochirus dubius (Munster,
- \ ec,otype; n‘ cat- AS 1 979 (BSPG) (x 1.5); 3) Etallonia longimana (Munster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 259 (BSPG) (x
u n8 te;™™ Master, 1839, lectotype, n. cat. AS VI 26 (BSPG) (x 2.5); 5) Magila latimana Munster, 1839, n. cat. 0117
1 1 tollection) (naturai size); 6) Magila desmarestii (Munster, 1839), holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS VII 199 (BSPG) (naturai
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
59
PI. XV - 1) Magila robusta Oppel, 1862, holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS I 675 (BSPG) (x 2); 2) Orhomalus deformis (Oppel, 1862),
holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS Vili 115 (BSPG) (naturai size); 3) Cycleryon propinquus (Schlotheim, 1822), lectotype, n. cat.
MB. A. 1107 (MNHB) (naturai size); 4) Cycleryon spinimanus (Germar, 1827), neotype, n. cat. AS I 982 (BSPG) (x 0.6); 5) Cycleryon
spinimanus (Germar, 1827), neotype, n. cat. AS I 982 (BSPG), detail of thè pereiopod I (naturai size); 6) Eryon schuberti v. Meyer,
1836, holotype, n. cat. SMF X/m 144-146 (SMF) (x 2).
60
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GÙNTER SCHWEIGERT
I. \\ i - 1 1 Cyc leryon orbiculatus (Munster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 760 (BSPG) (x 0.8); 2) Cycleryon subrotundus (Miinster,
1 83^), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 762 (BSPG) (x 1 .2); 3) Cycleryon subrotundus (Munster, 1 839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 762 (BSPG)
in ultraviolet ìllumination (x 1.2); 4) Cycleryon armatus (v. Knebel, 1907), lectotype, n. cat. MB. A. 236 (MNHB) (x 0 7)- 5 Cycleryon
elongatus (Munster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VII 761 (BSPG) (x 1.2).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
61
PI. XVII - 1 Eryon arctiformis (Schlotheim, 1822), holotype, n. cat. K 38 MB. A. 253 (MNHB) (x 1.3); 2) Rosenfeldia oppeli (Wood-
ward, 1866), holotype by monotypy, n. cat. 44886 (BM) (x 2); 3) Knebelia bilobata (Miinster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS VI 39
(BSPG) (x 0.8); 4) Knebelia bilobata (Miinster, 1839), n. cat. AS VII 754 (BSPG), detail of thè frontal margin (x 2.5); 5) Palaeopen-
tacheles roettenbacheri (Miinster, 1839), lectotype, n. cat. AS I 993 (BSPG) (x 1.2).
62
ALESSANDRO GARASSfNO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PI. XVIII - 1) Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839), without catalogue number (private collection), ultraviolet illumina-
tion (x 2); 2) Palaeopentacheles roetienbacheri (Munster, 1839), without catalogue number (BSPG), detail of thè chela of pereiopod
I (x 4); 3) Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839), without catalogue number (BSPG), detail of abdominal somites (x 4);
4) Palaeopentacheles roettenbacheri (Munster, 1839), without catalogue number (BSPG), detail of thè tail fan (x 2 5)- 5) Palinurina
longipes Munster, 1839, lectotype, n. cat. AS V 46 (BSPG) (x 0.7).
THE UPPER JURASSIC SOLNHOFEN DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN FAUNA. PART I
63
PI. IXX - 1) Palinurina pygmea Miinster, 1839, lectotype, n. cat. AS I 996 (BSPG) (x 1.5); 2) Palinurina tenera Oppel, 1862, lecto-
type, n. cat. AS I 995 (BSPG) (x 1.2); 3) Palinurina tenera Oppel, 1862, n. cat. SMNS 65476 (Frattigiani collection) (naturai size); 4)
Cancrinos claviger Miinster, 1839, neotype, n. cat. AS I 998 (BSPG) (x 0.6).
64
ALESSANDRO GARASSINO & GUNTER SCHWEIGERT
PI. XX - 1) Cancrinos claviger Miinster, 1839, neotype, n. cat. AS I 998 (BSPG), detail of thè carapace and cephalic appendages
(naturai size); 2) Cancrinos claviger Miinster, 1839, neotype, n. cat. AS I 998 (BSPG), detail of thè antennal flagellum (x 1.7); 3)
( ancrinos latipes Mùnster, 1839, holotype by monotypy, n. cat. AS VII 769 (BSPG) (x 0.6); 4) Cancrinos claviger Miinster, 1839, n.
cat. 1975 IX 13 (BSPG) (x 0.5); 5) Cancrinos claviger Miinster, 1839, n. cat. 1975 IX 13 (BSPG), detail of thè pleurae of abdominal
somites and tail fan (x 1.2).
Ili - PELOSIO G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Al¬
pe Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Hildoceras, Phymatoceras, Paronice-
ras e Frech iella. Conclusioni generali, pp. 143-204, 2 figg.. 6 tavv.
Volume XVIII
I - PINNA G., 1969 - Revisione delle ammoniti figurate da Giuseppe Me¬
neghini nelle Taw. 1-22 della « Monographie des fossiles du calcaire
rouge ammonitique » (1867-1881)./?/). 5-22, 2 figg., 6 tavv.
II - MONTANARI L., 1969 - Aspetti geologici del Lias di Gozzano (Lago
d’Orta ).pp. 23-92, 42 figg.. 4 taw. n.t.
Ili - PETRUCC1 F., BORTOLAM1 G. C. & DAL PIAZ G. V., 1970 - Ri¬
cerche sull’anfiteatro morenico di Rivoli-Avigliana (Prov. Torino) e sul
suo substrato cristallino./)/). 93-169, con carta a colori al 1:40.000, 14
figg., 4 taw. a colori e 2 b.n.
Volume XIX
I - CANTALUPPI G., 1970 - Le Hildoceratidae del Lias medio delle regio¬
ni mediterranee - Loro successione e modificazioni nel tempo. Riflessi
biostratigrafici e sistematici./)/). 5-46, 2 tabb. n.t.
II - PINNA G. & LEVI-SETTI F., 1971 - 1 Dactylioceratidae della Provin¬
cia Mediterranea (Cephalopoda Ammonoidea). pp. 47-136, 21 figg.,
12 taw
III - PELOSIO G., 1973 - Le ammoniti del Trias medio di Asklepieion (Ar-
golide, Grecia) - 1. Fauna del «calcare a Ptychites» (Anisico sup.). pp.
137-168, 3 figg., 9 taw.
Volume XX
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI 0., 1971 - La cultura di Remedello.
Problematica ed ergologia di una facies dell’Eneolitico Padano, pp.
5-80, 2 figg., 20 tavv.
II - PETRUCCI F., 1972 - Il bacino del Torrente Cinghio (Prov. Parma).
Studio sulla stabilità dei versanti e conservazione del suolo, pp. 81-127,
3 7 figg., 6 carte tematiche.
Ili - CERETTI E. & POLUZZI A., 1973 - Briozoi della biocalcarenite del
Fosso di S. Spirito (Chieti, Abruzzi)./)/). 129-169, 18 figg., 2 tavv.
fflr
Volume XXI
I - PINNA G., 1 974 - 1 crostacei della fauna triassica di Cene in Val Seriana
(Bergamo)./)/). 5-34, 16 figg., 16 taw.
II - POLUZZI A., 1975 - I Briozoi Cheilostomi del Pliocene della Val d’Ar-
da (Piacenza, Italia)./)/). 35-78, 6 figg., 5 taw.
Ili - BRAMBILLA G., 1976 - I Molluschi pliocenici di Villalvemia (Ales¬
sandria). I. Lamellibranchi. pp. 79-128, 4 figg., 10 taw.
Volume XXII
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI O. & CALEGARI G„ 1978 - Corpus
delle pintaderas preistoriche italiane. Problematica, schede, iconogra¬
fia. pp. 5-30, 6 figg., 13 tavv.
II - PINNA G., 1979 - Osteologia dello scheletro di Kritosaurus notabilis
(Lambe, 1914) del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (Ornithi-
schia Hadrosauridae). pp. 31-56, 3 figg., 9 tavv.
Ili - BIANCOTTI A., 1981 - Geomorfologia dell’Alta Langa (Piemonte
meridionale). pp. 57-104, 28 figg., 12 tabb., 1 carta f.t.
Volume XXIII
I - GIACOBINI G., CALEGARI G. & PINNA G., 1982-1 resti umani fos¬
sili della zona di Arena Po (Pavia). Descrizione e problematica di una
serie di reperti di probabile età paleolitica, pp. 5-44, 4 figg., 16 tavv.
II - POLUZZI A., 1982 - I Radiolari quaternari di un ambiente idrotermale
del Mar Tirreno./)/). 45-72, 3 figg., 1 tab., 13 tavv.
Ili - ROSSI F., 1984 - Ammoniti del Kimmeridgiano superiore-Berriasiano
inferiore del Passo del Furio (Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano), pp. 73-
138, 9 figg.. 2 tabb., 8 taw.
Volume XXIV
I - PINNA G., 1984 - Osteologia di Drepanosaurus unguicaudatus, lepido-
sauro triassico del sottordine Lacertilia. pp. 5-28, 12 figg., 2 tavv.
II - NOSOTTI S. e PINNA G., 1989 - Storia delle ricerche e degli studi
sui rettili Placodonti. Parte prima 1830-1902 . pp. 29-86, 24 figg.. 12
taw.
Volume XXV
I - CALEGARI G., 1989 - Le incisioni rupestri di Taouardei (Gao, Mali).
Problematica generale e repertorio iconografico, pp. 1-14, 9 figg., 24
taw.
II - PINNA G. & NOSOTTI S., 1989 - Anatomia, morfologia funzionale
e paleoecologia del rettile placodonte Psephoderma alpinum Meyer,
1858 .pp. 15-50, 20 figg., 9 taw.
HI - CALDARA R., 1990 - Revisione Tassonomica delle specie paleartiche
del genere Tychius Germar (Coleoptera Curculionidae). pp. 51-218,
57 5 figg
Volume XXVI
I - PINNA G., 1992 - Cyamodus hildegardis Peyer, 1931 (Reptilia, Placo-
dontia ).pp. 1-21, 23 figg.
II - CALEGARI G. a cura di, 1993 - L’arte e l’ambiente del Sahara preisto¬
rico: dati e interpretazioni./)/). 25-556, 647 figg.
Ili - ANDRI E. e ROSSI F., 1993 - Genesi ed evoluzione di frangenti,
cinture, barriere ed atolli. Dalle stromatoliti alle comunità di scogliera
moderne./)/). 559-610, 49 figg., 1 tav.
Volume XXVII
I - PINNA G. and GHISELIN M. edited by, 1996 - Biology as History. N.
1 . Systematic Biology as an Historical Science, pp. 1-133, 68 figs.
II - LEONARDI C. e SASSI D. a cura di, 1997 - Studi geobotanici ed en-
tomofaunistici nel Parco Regionale del Monte Barro, pp. 135-266, 122
figg -, 23 tabb.
Volume XXVIII
I - BANFI E. & GALASSO G., 1998 - La flora spontanea della città di
Milano alle soglie del terzo millennio e i suoi cambiamenti a partire dal
1700 .pp. 267-388, 71 figg., 30 tabb.
Volume XXIX
I - CALEGARI G., 1 999 - L’arte rupestre dell’Eritrea. Repertorio ragionato
ed esegesi iconografica./)/). 1-174, 268 figg.
Volume XXX
I - PEZZOTTA F. edited by, 2000 - Mineralogy and petrology of shallow
depth pegmatites. Paper from thè First International Workshop, pp. 1-
117, 30 figs., 19 tabs.
II - PARISI B„ FRANCHINO A. & BERTI A. con la collaborazione di
POTENZA B. & RUBINI D., 2000 - La Società Italiana di Scienze
Naturali 1855 - 2000. Percorsi storici./)/). 1-163, 199 figg.
III - DE ANGELI A. & GARASSINO A., 2002 - Galatheid, chirostylid and
porcellanid decapods (Crostacea, Decapoda, Anomura) from thè Eoce¬
ne and Oligocene of Vicenza (N Italy). /)/). 1-31, 21 figs., 9 pls.
Volume XXXI
I - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2002 - The braincase of Placodus Agassiz,
1833 (Reptilia, Placodontia). pp. 1-18, 15 figs.
II - MARTORELLI G., 2002 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. (1895). Riedizione a cura di Fausto Barbagli, pp. [XX] 1-216,
[14] 46 figg., 4 taw.
III - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2003 - Eusaurosphaigis dalsassoi n. gen.
n. sp., a new, unusual diapsid reptile from thè Middle Triassic of Besano
(Lombardy, N Italy)./)/). 1-33, 19 figs., 1 tab., 3 pls.
Volume XXXII
I - ALESSANDRELLO A., BRACCHI G. & RIOU B„ 2004 - Polychaete,
sipunculan and enteropneust worms from thè Lower Callovian (Middle
Jurassic) of La Voulte-sur-Rhóne (Ardèche, France). pp. 1-16, 9 figs.,
1 pi¬
li - RIEPPEL O. & HEAD J. J., 2004 - New specimens of thè fossil snake
genus Eupodophis Rage & Escuillié, from Cenomanian (Late Creta-
ceous) of Lebanon. pp. 1-26, 13 figs., 1 tab.
III - BRACCHI G. & ALESSANDRELLO A., 2005 - Paleodiversity of thè
free-living polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) and description of new
taxa from thè Upper Cretaceous Lagerstdtten of Haqel, Hadjula and
Al-Namoura (Lebanon). pp. 1-48, 8 figs., 1 tab., 16 pls.
Volume XXXIII
I - BOESI A. & CARDI F. edited by, 2005 - Wildlife and plants in tradi-
tional and modem Tibet: conception, exploration and conservation. pp.
1-88, 30 figs., 9 tabs.
II - BANFI E., BRACCHI G„ GALASSO . & ROMANI E., 2005 - Agro-
stologia Piacentina, pp. , figs., tabs.
III - LIVI P. a cura di 2005 - I fondi speciali della Biblioteca del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. La raccolta di stampe antiche del
Centro Studi Archeologia Africana, pp. 1-250, 389 figs.
Le Memorie sono disponibili presso la Segreteria della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali,
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55 -20121 Milano
Pubblicazione disponibile al cambio
6 OC
T-ooSi
ubrapy
SEP 4 z006
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo II
della Società Italiana
di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico
di Storia Naturale di Milano
DIRK FUCHS
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY
OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS
(CEPHALOPODA)
FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS
OF LEBANON
MILANO MAGGIO 2006
Elenco delle Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume I
I - CORNALI A E., 1865 - Descrizione di una nuova specie dei genere
Felis: Felis jacobita (Com.). 9 pp., 1 tav.
II - MAGNI-GRIFF1 F., 1865 - Di una specie d 'Hippolais nuova per l’Ita¬
lia. 6 pp., 1 tav.
Ili - GASTALDI B., 1865 - Sulla riescavazione dei bacini lacustri per opera
degli antichi ghiacciai. 30 pp., 2 figg., 2 tavv.
IV - SEGUENZA G., 1865 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina. 88 pp., 8 taw.
V - GIBELLI G., 1865 - Sugli organi riproduttori del genere Verrucaria,
16 pp., 1 tav.
VI - BEGGIATO F. S., 1865 - Antracoterio di Zovencedo e di Monteviale
nel Vicentino, 10 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1865 - Di alcuni resti umani e degli oggetti di umana
industria dei tempi preistorici raccolti in Toscana. 32 pp., 4 taw.
Vili - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1866 - Come sia fatto l’organo che fa
lume nella lucciola volante dell’Italia centrale (Luciola italica) e come
le fibre muscolari in questo ed altri Insetti ed Artropodi. 28 pp., 2 taw.
IX - MAGGI L., 1865 - Intorno al genere Aeolosoma. 18 pp., 2 tavv.
X - CORNALIA E., 1 865 - Sopra i caratteri microscopici offerti dalle Cantari¬
di e da altri Coleotteri facili a confondersi con esse. 40 pp., 4 taw.
Volume II
I - ISSEL A., 1866 - Dei Molluschi raccolti nella provincia di Pisa, 38 pp.
II - GENTILLI A., 1 866 - Quelques considérations sur l’origine des bassins
lacustres, àpropos des sondages du Lac de Come. 12 pp., 8 ta\>v.
Ili - MOLON F., 1 867 - Sulla flora terziaria delle Prealpi venete. 140 pp.
IV - D’ACHIARDI A., 1866 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummuiitico
delle Alpi venete. 54 pp., 5 taw.
V - COCCHI I., 1 866 - Sulla geologia dell’alta Valle di Magra. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VI - SEGUENZA G., 1866 - Sulle importanti relazioni paleontologiche di
talune rocce cretacee della Calabria con alcuni terreni di Sicilia e del¬
l’Africa settentrionale. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1 866 - L’uomo fossile nell’Italia centrale. 82 pp., 21 figg.,
4 taw.
Vili - GARO VAGLIO S., 1866 - Manzonia cantiana, novum Lichenum
Angiocarporum genus propositum atque descriptum. 8 pp., 1 tav.
IX - SEGUENZA G., 1 867 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina (Pteropodi ed Eteropodi). 22 pp., 1 tav.
X - DURER B., 1867 - Osservazioni meteorologiche fatte alla Villa Carlot¬
ta sul lago di Como, ecc. 48 pp. 11 tavv.
Volume III
I - EMERY C., 1873 - Studii anatomici sulla Vìpera Redii. 16 pp., 1 tav.
II - GARO VAGLIO S., 1 867 - Thelopsis, Belonia, Weitenwebera et Limbo¬
ria, quatuor Lichenum Angiocarporum genera recognita iconibusque
illustrata. 12 pp., 2 taw.
III - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1867 - Studii sulle Cocciniglie. 88 pp., 7 taw.
IV - CLAPAREDE E. R. e PANCERI P., 1867 - Nota sopra un Alciopide
parassito della Cydippe densa Forsk. 8 pp. 1 tavv
V - GARO VAGLIO S., 1871 - De Pertusariis Europae mediae commenta¬
no. 40 pp., 4 taw.
Volume IV
I - D'ACHIARDI A., 1868 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummuiitico del-
l’Alpi venete. Parte 11. 32 pp. 8 tavv.
II - GARO VAGLIO S., 1868 - Octona Lichenum genera vel adirne con¬
troversa, ve 1 sedis prorsus incertae in systemate, novis descriptionibus
iconibusque accuratissimis illustrata. 18 pp., 2 taw.
Ili - MARINONI C., 1868 - Le abitazioni lacustri e gli avanzi di umana
industria in Lombardia. 66 pp., 5 figg., 7 taw.
IV - (Non pubblicato).
V - MARINONI C., 1871 - Nuovi avanzi preistorici in Lombardia. 28 pp.,
3 figg., 2 taw.
NUOVA SERIE
Volume V
I - MARTORELLI G., 1895 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. 216 pp., 46 figg., 4 taw.
Volume VI
I - DE ALESSANDRI G., 1897 - La pietra da cantoni di Rosignano e di
Vignale. Studi stratigrafici e paleontologici. 104 pp., 2 taw., 1 carta.
II - MARIOREL.LI G., 1898 - Le forme e le simmetrie delle macchie nel
piumaggio. Memoria ornitologica. 112 pp., 63 figg., 1 tavv.
Ili - PAVESI P., 1901- L'abbate Spallanzani a Pavia. 68 pp., 14 figg., 1 tav.
Volume VII
I - DE ALESSANDRI G., 1910 - Studi sui pesci triasici della Lombardia.
164 pp., 9 taw.
Volume Vili
1 - REPOSSI E., 1915 - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrografici e
geologici. Parte 1 .pp. 1-46, 5 figg., 3 taw.
II - REPOSSI E., 1916 (1917) - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrogra¬
fici e geologici. Parte II . pp. 47-186, 5 figg. 9 taw.
Ili - A1RAGHI C., 1917 - Sui molari d’elefante delle alluvioni lombarde,
con osservazioni sulla filogenia e scomparsa di alcuni Proboscidati./?/?.
187-242, 4 figg., 3 taw.
Volume IX
I - BEZZI M., 1918 - Studi sulla ditterofauna nivale delle Alpi italiane./?/?.
1-164. 7 figg. 2 taw.
II - SERA G. L., 1 920 - Sui rapporti della conformazione della base del cra¬
nio colle forme craniensi e colle strutture della faccia nelle razze uma¬
ne. (Saggio di una nuova dottrina craniologica con particolare riguardo
dei principali cranii fossili), pp. 165-262, 7 figg., 2 taw.
Ili - DE BEAUX O. e FESTA E., 1927 - La ricomparsa del Cinghiale nel¬
l'Italia settentrionale-occidentale,/?/?. 263-320, 13 figg., 7 tavv.
Volume X
I - DESIO A., 1929 - Studi geologici sulla regione dell’Albenza (Prealpi
Bergamasche)./?/?. 1-156, 27 figg., 1 tav., 1 carta.
II - SCORTECCI G., 1937 - Gli organi di senso della pelle degli Agamidi.
pp. 157-208, 39 figg. 2 tavv.
Ili - SCORTECCI G., 1941- I recettori degli Agamidi. pp. 209-326, 80 figg.
Volume XI
I - GUIGL1A D., 1 944 - Gli Sfecidi italiani del Museo di Milano (Hymen.).
pp. 1-44, 4 figg., 5 tavv.
II-III - GIACOBINI V. e P1GNATTI S„ 1955 - Flora e Vegetazione dell’Al¬
ta Valle del Braulio. Con speciale riferimento ai pascoli di altitudine.
pp. 45-238, 31 figg., 1 carta.
Volume XII
I - VIALLI V., 1956 - Sul rinoceronte e l’elefante dei livelli superiori della
serie lacustre di Leffe (Bergamo)./?/?. 1-70, 4 figg. 6 tavv.
I - VENZO S., 1957 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte I: Tratto occidentale Gardone-Desenzano. pp. 71-140, 14
figg-, 6 tavv., 1 carta.
Ili - VIALLI V., 1959 - Ammoniti sinemuriane del Monte Albenza (Berga¬
mo). pp. 141-188, 2 figg.. 5 taw.
Volume XIII
I - VENZO S., 1961- Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte II. Tratto orientale Garda-Adige e anfiteatro atesino di
Rivoli veronese./?/?. 1-64, 25 figg., 9 taw., 1 carta.
II - PINNA G., 1963 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Mercaticeras, Pseudomercaticeras e Bro-
dieìa. pp. 65-98, 2 figg., 4 tavv.
Ili - ZANZUCCHI G., 1963 - Le Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano)
di Entratico in Val Cavallina (Bergamasco orientale), pp. 99-146, 2
figg., 8 tavv.
Volume XIV
I - VENZO S., 1965 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico
frontale del Garda dal Chiese all’Adige, pp. 1-82, 11 figg., 4 taw., 1
carta.
II - PINNA G., 1966 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglia Dactylioceratidae. pp. 83-136, 4 tavv.
Ili - DI ENI I., MASSARI F. e MONTANARI L., 1966 - Il Paleogene dei
dintorni di Orosei (Sardegna), pp. 13-184, 5 figg., 8 taw.
Volume XV
I - CARETTO P. G., 1966 - Nuova classificazione di alcuni Briozoi plioce¬
nici, precedentemente determinati quali Idrozoi del genere Hydractinia
Van Beneden. pp. 1-88, 2 7 figg. 9 tavv.
II - DIENI I. e MASSARI F., 1966 - Il Neogene e il Quaternario dei dintorni
di Orosei (Sardegna)./?/?. 89-142, 8 figg., 7 taw.
Ili - BARBIERI F„ IACCARINO S„ BARBIERI F. & PETRUCCI F„ 1967
- Il Pliocene del Subappennino Piacentino-Parmense-Reggiano. pp.
143-188, 20 figg., 3 tavv.
Volume XVI
I - CARETTO P. G., 1967 - Studio morfologico con l’ausilio del metodo
statistico e nuova classificazione dei Gasteropodi pliocenici attribuibili
al Murex brandaris Linneo, pp. 1-60, 1 fig., 7 tabb., 10 taw.
II - SACCHI VIALLI G. e CANTALUPPI G„ 1967-1 nuovi fossili di Goz¬
zano (Prealpi piemontesi)./?/?. 61-128, 30 figg., 8 taw.
Ili - PIGORINI B., 1967 - Aspetti sedimentologici del Mare Adriatico, pp.
129-200, 13 figg., 4 tabb. 7 tavv.
Volume XVII
I - PINNA G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglie Lytoceratidae, Nannolytoceratidae,
Hammatoceratidae (excl. Phymatoceratinae) Hildoceratidae (excl.
Hildoceratinae e Bouleiceratinae) . pp. 1-70, 2 taw. n.t., 6 figg-, 6 taw.
II - VENZO S. & PELOSIO G., 1968 - Nuova fauna a Ammonoidi del-
1 Anisico superiore di Lenna in Val Brembana (Bergamo)./?/?. 71-142,
5 figg., 11 taw.
Dirk Fuchs
Freie Universitat Berlin, Institut fìir Geologische Wissenschaften, Fachrichtung Palàontologie
Morphology, taxonomy and diversity
of vampyropod Coleoids (Cephalopoda)
from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo II
Maggio 2006
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
© 2006 Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Corso Venezia , 55 - 20121 Milano
In copertina: Vampyroteuthis infernalìs (Chun, 1903). Drawing by Monika Bulang-Lòrcher.
Registrato al Tribunale di Milano al n. 6694
Direttore responsabile : Anna Alessandrello
Responsabile di redazione: Stefania Nosotti
Grafica editoriale: Michela Mura
Stampa: Litografia Solari, Peschiera Borromeo - Maggio 2006
ISSN 0376-2726
Dirk Fuchs
Morphology, taxonomy and diversity
of vampyropod Coleoids (Cephalopoda)
from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
Abstract - Morphology, taxonomy and diversity of coleoids from thè Cenomanian and Santonian of Lebanon are described. Until
hitherto, thè coleoid fauna of thè Late Cretaceous Lithograhic Limestones of Hàqel, Hjoùla (both Upper Cenomanian) and Sàhel Aalma
(Upper Santonian) includes five vampyropod and only one belemnoid species. Decabrachia are unknown from these localities.
The comparatively poor information about thè genus Dorateuthis Woodward, 1883 is discussed morphologically as well as
taxonomically. Rachiteuthis donovani, a taxon newly introduced herein, is described for thè first time. Specimens determined as Tra-
chyteuthis cf. hastiformis Riippel, 1 829 extend thè stratigraphical range of this genus from thè Callovian up to thè Cenomanian. Close
morphological affinities of Libanoteuthis libanotica Fraas, 1878 with Glyphiteuthis ornata Reuss, 1854 from thè Turonian of Bohemia
(Czech Republic) suggest that Libanoteuthis Kretzoi, 1942 is a junior subjective synonym of Glyphiteuthis Reuss, 1854. Morphologi¬
cal knowledge about each taxon is improved by an exceptional high number of specimens, which are deposited in thè Museo Civico
di Storia Naturale di Milano (MSNM).
Key-words: Coleoidea, Vampyropoda, Cenomanian, Santonian, Lebanon.
Riassunto - Morfologia, tassonomia e diversità dei coleoidei vampiropodi (Cephalopoda) del Cretaceo superiore del Libano.
Vengono descritte la morfologia, la tassonomia e la diversità dei coleoidei del Cenomaniano e del Santoniano del Libano. Ad oggi,
la fauna a coleoidei dei calcari litografici del Cretaceo superiore di Hàqel, di Hijoula (entrambi Cenomaniano superiore) e di Sàhel
Aalma (Santoniano superiore) comprende cinque specie di vampiropodi e una sola specie di belemnoidi. In queste località non sono
stati rinvenuti esemplari di Decabrachia.
Vengono discusse dal punto di vista morfologico e tassonomico le informazioni relativamente scarse sul genere Dorateuthis
Woodward, 1883. Viene descritto per la prima volta Rachiteuthis donovani, un taxon precedentemente istituito e qui ripresentato. Gli
esemplari ascritti a Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis Riippel, 1829 estendono la distribuzione stratigrafica di questo genere dal Calloviano
fino al Cenomaniano. Le strette affinità morfologiche fra Libanoteuthis libanotica Fraas, 1878 e Glyphiteuthis ornata Reuss, 1854 del
Turoniano della Boemia (Repubblica Ceca) inducono a considerare Libanoteuthis Kretzoi, 1942 come sinonimo juniore soggettivo di
Glyphiteuthis Reuss, 1 854. La conoscenza della morfologia di ogni taxon è accresciuta grazie al numero eccezionalmente alto degli
esemplari a disposizione, depositati presso il Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (MSNM).
Parole chiave: Coleoidea, Vampyropoda, Cenomaniano, Santoniano, Libano.
INTRODUCTION
The Lithographic Limestones (“fish beds”, “fish
shales”) of Lebanon (Hàqel, Hjoùla and Sàhel Aalma) are
well-known for their well-preserved fossil assemblage.
Especially fishes and crustaceans have been thè subject of
many publications (Garassino, 1994; Schram et al., 1999;
Forey et al., 2003; Taverne & Filleul, 2003). By contrast,
knowledge about Cephalopod coleoids is comparatively
poor, although many beautiful specimens occur.
Coleoidea are typifìed by thè extant squids, cuttlefishes
and octopuses. According to Boletzky (2003) recent Coleoi¬
dea are classified into thè eight-armed Vampyropoda and thè
ten-armed Decabrachia. The third coleoid superorder consti-
tutes thè extinct Belemnoidea (Late Carboniferous - Late
Cretaceous). Within thè Vampyropoda thè Cirroctopoda and
thè Octopoda are grouped together as Octobrachia. The Octo-
brachia represent thè sister taxon of thè Vampyromorpha.
Decabrachia include thè Sepiida, Spirulida, Idi-
osepiida, Sepiolida and thè Teuthida. Although these
groups are comparatively well known, their phylogenetic
relationships are surprisingly problematic (Young & Vec¬
chione, 1996; Vecchione et al., 2000; Boletzky, 2003).
The fossil record of coleoid groups is usually biased
towards thè preservation of mineralised “hard parts”.
Discoveries of soft tissues are exclusively connected to
so-called “Konservat-Lagerstàtten”. Their extraordinary
preservational potential is thè most important factor by
which thè poor morphological knowledge, and conse-
quently thè problematic phylogeny of thè Coleoidea can
be improved (Donovan, 1977; Engeser, 1990; Doyle et
al., 1994; Young et al., 1998; Boletzky, 1999; Haas, 2002
and 2003). Well-known Lagerstàtten with a comparatively
high soft-part resolution are, for example, thè Sinemurian
of Osteno (Italy), thè Toarcian of Holzmaden (Germany)
and Yorkshire (England), thè Callovian of La Voulte-
sur-Rhòne (France) and Christian Malford (England),
thè Tithonian of Solnhofen (Germany), thè Cenomanian
of Hàqel (Lebanon) and thè Santonian of Sàhel Aalma
(Lebanon). For palaeobiologists, these biotas form unique
taphonomic and evolutionary Windows through thè Meso-
zoic, allowing detailed reconstructions.
DIRK FUCHS
The Late Cretaceous Lithographic Limestones of
Lebanon display a soft-part preservation that rivals thè
famous German “Posidonienschiefer” of Holzmaden and
thè “Solnhofener Plattenkalke”. So far five coleoid species
{Dorateuthis syriaca, Dorateuthis sahilalmae, Libano-
teuthis libanotica, Palaeoctopus newboldi, Acanthoteuthis
syriaca ) are known from these Late Cretaceous deposits.
Several specimens of them (including Holotypes) are
deposited in thè museums of Berlin, Stuttgart (both Ger-
many), Paris (France) and London (United Kingdom).
However, thè Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
(Italy) as well as thè Black Hills Institute of Geological
Research in Black Hills (United States) house by far thè j
largest collection of Lebanese coleoids. Neither thè Milan j
nor thè Black Hills specimens have ever been described.
For thè first time a large number of specimens allows a
detailed morphological documentation and comparison.
The description of both collections starts with thè Milan
specimens. A forthcoming project with Neal L. Larson
(Black Hills Institute of Geological Research) describing
thè specimens of thè Black Hills collection will comprise I
thè entire cephalopod fauna of Hàqel.
PREVIOUS STUDIES ON COLEOID CEPHALOPODS FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS
OF LEBANON
First investigations of Lebanese coleoids began in
1846 with incomplete descriptions by Sowerby, who first
mentioned Calai's Newboldi, better known as Palaeoc¬
topus newboldi Woodward, 1883, thè first undoubted
member of thè Octopoda. More serious and detailed
studies by Lartret (1877), Fraas (1878), and Woodward
(1883, 1896) yielded two other members of thè Cole¬
oidea which are now assigned to thè Vampyropoda:
Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward, 1883 and Libanoteuthis
libanotica Fraas, 1878.
In 1 922 Naef established two additional taxa. One was
erected by means of a doubtful specimen of Fraas, which
Naef called “ Sepìalites Sahil Almae ”. This specimen
(deposited in Stuttgart) is now considered to be thè Holo-
type of Dorateuthis sahilalmae. Naef’s other specimen,
“ Beloteuthis libanotica ”, was proved to be thè isolated
gladius element of Palaeoctopus newboldi (Haas, 2002;
Bizikov, 2004).
Roger ( 1 946) treated taxa such as Palaeoctopus new¬
boldi, Dorateuthis syriaca and Libanoteuthis libanotica
and established soft parts and hooks of thè first Lebanese
belemnoid Belemnoteuthis (Acanthoteuthis) syriaca,
whose classification is admittedly uncertain.
Additional information on Lebanese coleoids Comes
from Engeser & Reitner (1986). They re-described thè
collection of Fraas as well as other Lebanese specimens
accumulated in thè Museum fur Naturkunde Stuttgart
(SMNS). They erected a new genus ( Parateudopsis ) and
mentioned an uncertain species ( Palaeololigo sp.). Both s
taxa have proved to belong to remains of Palaeoctopus.
GEOLOGICAL SETTING
Studied specimens are derived from thè Cenomanian
outcrops at Hàqel (45 km north of Beirut) and Hjoula (10
km east of Byblos) as well as thè Santonian outcrops of
Sàhel Aalma (25 km north of Beirut) (Fig. 1). Today each
site is exclusively quarried for fossils. In recent decades
several authors have investigated these geological settings
(Ejel & Dubertret, 1966; Hùckel, 1970, 1974 and 1974b;
Hemleben, 1977; Dalla Vecchia et al., 2002).
Fig. 1 - Locality map of Hàqel, Hjoùla and Sàhel Aalma.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
5
The precise age of Hàqel and Hjoùla varies accord-
ing to different authors. In his comprehensive sedimen-
tological study Huckel (1970) divided thè Cenomanian
Limestones into seven units and concluded that Hàqel
(unite V) and Hjoùla (unite IV) were deposited during thè
later Lower Cenomanian. Owing to thè occurrence of thè
ammonite Allocrioceras annulatum as a member of thè
Metoicoceras geslinianum Zone, Wippich & Lehmann
(2004) confirmed thè conclusions of Hemleben ( 1 977) and
dated Hàqel and Hjoùla as Upper Cenomanian (Fig. 2).
Dalla Vecchia et al. (2002) considered Hàqel and Hjoùla
as lower Upper Cenomanian, because Nammoùra (another
fossil-rich locality a few kilometres in thè South of Hjoùla
and slightly younger than Hàqel and Hjoùla) is dated as
Middle Cenomanian
Sàhel Aalma, a locality with very similar depositional
conditions and almost thè same coleoid diversity, is com-
monly dated as Upper Santonian (Ejel-Dubertret, 1966;
Garassino, 1994).
Each outcrop is of particular morphological impor-
tance, because fossils show precise preservation of soft
tissues. The fauna consists of fishes (Forey et al, 2003;
Taverne & Filleul, 2003), crustaceans (Garassino, 1994;
Schram et al., 1999), echinoderms (Huckel, 1970), other
molluscs (Forey et al., 2003; Wippich & Lehmann, 2004)
and worms (Dalla Vecchia & Venturini, 1999; Bracchi &
Alessandrello, 2005), pterosaurs (Dalla Vecchia et al.,
2001) and other reptiles (Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997; Dalla
Vecchia & Venturini 1999; Rieppel & Head, 2004; Cald-
well, 2006 in press; Tong et al., 2006).
Palaeogeographers believe that thè sediments of Hàqel
and Hjoùla were deposited at thè edge of thè Thethian
shelf margin, 400 km away from thè ancient coastline
(Hembleben, 1977; Philip et al., 1993). The map in Fig. 3
illustrates thè palaeogeographic situation of thè Central
Tethys during thè Cenomanian. Huckel (1970) found
that Hàqel and Hjoùla were deposited in small basins.
Most authors agree that thè “fish beds” were formed in
an anoxic environment. Hemleben (1977) suggested that
upwelling at thè shelf margin occasionally supported
blooms of protists or “red tides”, which caused episodes
of mass mortality. Deoxygenated bottom water and high
sedimentation rates then prevented thè decay of dead
bodies.
< si
o
w
u
s
w
QZ
U
pts
Ed
Cd
Cu
D
84mya
86mya .
89mya •
94mya
■ lOOmya ■
Campanian
Santonian
Coniacian
Turonian
Cenomanian
Albian
M
Sahel Aalma
Hàqel
Hjoula
Fig. 2 - Stratigraphic age of Hàqel, Hjoùla and Sàhel Aalma.
Russian Platform
cxposed land
HH
shallow marine
deep marin
North- Africa
Fennoscandia
Fig. 3 - Palaeogeographic map of thè Central Tethys during thè Late
Cenomanian. L = Lebanon. Modified after Philip et al. (1993).
MATERIAL
The study was conducted on 38 specimens belong-
ing to thè Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
(MSNM). Most specimens come from Hàqel and Hjoùla.
Only two specimens come from Sàhel Aalma. Material
from Nammoùra was not available.
Specimens were investigated in detail with a binocular
microscope. Oblique light reveals faint structures, which
were not recognized under vertical light conditions. Ultra-
violet light was used to indicate phosphatised soft tissues.
A number of additional specimens from different locali-
ties (including Holotypes housed in collections of Berlin,
Stuttgart, London, Paris Vienna, and Prague) were used as
comparative material.
MODES OF PRESERVATION
All specimens are compressed and flattened on a 2-
dimensional surface. Although thè mineralogy was not
analysed, gladii (singular “gladius”: a stiff supporting
structure in thè dorsal mantle, see below) were most
probably preserved as francolite. However, francolite is
a diagenetical result. On thè assumption that vampyropod
gladii derived from a belemnoid organic proostracum,
a purely organic composition is reasonable (Hewitt &
Wignall, 1988; Doguzhaeva & Mutvei, 2003; Fuchs et
al., submitted).
6
DIRK FUCHS
Konservat-Lagerstàtten are characterised by a detailed
preservation of soft tissues. According to Allison (1988),
Allison & Briggs (1991), Wilby (1993), Kear et al. (1995)
and Wilby & Briggs (1997), thè highest-fidelity preserva¬
tion occurs where muscular structures are post-mortem
mineralised in apatite (a calciumphosphate).
Sofìt-part preservation of coleoids is various. Only
in rare cases thè specimens include articulated bodies
complete with mantle, arms, retractors and fins. Typically,
coleoids are only partially mineralised and disarticulated,
but mineralisation of thè mantle in dose association with
ami stubs occurs often. Jaw preservation is common, and
occasionally stomach contents as well.
An ink sac occurs in almost each specimen, but thè
possession of ink is not considered to be a diagnostic
feature within coleoids and is therefore neglected in thè
descriptions.
SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY
Subclass Coleoidea Bather, 1888
Superorder Vampyropoda Boletzky, 1992
Suborder Prototeuthina Naef, 1921
Family Plesioteuthididae Naef, 1921
Genus Dorateuthis Woodward, 1883
Type species: Dorateuthis Syriaca Woodward, 1883;
by monotypy.
Stratigraphical range: Upper Cenomanian of Hjoùla
and Upper Santonian of Sàhel, Lebanon.
Remarks: Woodward (1883) first described Dora¬
teuthis syriaca from Sàhel Aalma. Later-treated specimens
of Dorateuthis syriaca as well as specimens assigned to
Dorateuthis sahilalmae derived from Sàhel Aalma. How-
ever, as it will be shown, Dorateuthis already occurred in
thè older Cenomanian of Hjoùla.
The placement of thè genus Dorateuthis within thè
Leptotheuthididae, Naef 1922 by Jeletzky (1966: 45) and
other authors cannot be accepted. The view of Jeletzky
(1966) is based on a doubtful reconstruction given by
Roger (1946: 14, Figs. 6-7). After re-study of Roger’s
specimens in Paris there are no doubts that thè genus
Dorateuthis has more in common with Plesioteuthis
or Senefelderiteuthis than with Leptotheuthis. Thus we
follow thè classification of Donovan (1977) and Engeser
& Reitner (1986) in placing thè genus Dorateuthis within
thè Plesioteuthididae.
Dorateuthis cf. syriaca Woodward, 1883 (Pls. I-III)
1 883 Dorateuthis Syriaca n. sp. - Woodward, p. 1 ff., PI. 1 .
1888 Curculionites senonicus - Kolbe, pp. 135-136, PI.
11, Fig. 8.
1920 Dorateuthis Syriaca Woodward - Bùlow-Trummer,
p. 262.
1922 Sepialites Sahil-Almae - Naef, p. 134, Fig. 49.
1922 Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward, 1883 - Naef, p.
135, Fig. 50.
(?) 1 932 Doratoteuthis syriaca H. Woodward - Quenstedt,
p. 186 ff.
1946 Leptoteuthis syriaca Woodward - Roger, p. 14 ff.,
Fig. 6-7, PI. 4, Fig. 5-6, PI. 9, Fig. 1.
1966 Dorateuthis syriaca - Jeletzky, pp. 44-45.
1977 Plesioteuthis syriaca - Donovan, p. 40.
1982 Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward - Reitner & Enge¬
ser, p. 215.
1986 Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward, 1883 - Engeser &
Reitner, p. 4.
1986 Dorateuthis sahilalmae (Naef, 1922) - Engeser &
Reitner, p. 4, Fig 1, PI. 1, Fig. 1.
1 986 Dorateuthis sp. - Engeser & Reitner, p. 5, PI. 1 , Fig. 2.
1987 Dorateuthis .syr/aca Woodward, 1883-Riegraf,p. 97.
1988 Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward, 1883 - Engeser, p. 42.
2002 Maioteuthis n. sp. - Novati 2002, p. 88.
2004 Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward — Lukeneder &
Harzhauser, p. 3.
Holotype: specimen of Woodward (1883, PI. 1), BMNH
C 5017 (PI. Ili, Fig. B).
Locus typicus: Sàhel Aalma, Lebanon.
Stratum typicum: Lithographic Limestones of Sàhel
Aalma, Upper Santonian.
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: Upper
Cenomanian of Hjoùla - Upper Santonian of Sàhel
Aalma, Lebanon.
Material: eight specimens were investigated: MSNM
Ì25144 (PI. I, Figs. A-B), Ì24800 (PI. II, Fig. A), Ì25133
(PI. II, Fig. B), Ì25134 (PI. Ili, Fig. A), Ì25128, Ì24802
originated from Hjoùla, whereas i23 1 08 (PI. I, Fig. C) and
Ì26092 come from Sàhel Aalma.
Description
Gladius: specimens MSNM i25 144 (PI. I, Fig. A),
Ì23108 (PI. I, Fig. C), Ì25128 and Ì26092 are seen either
in dorsal or ventral views whereas specimens Ì24800 (PI.
II, Fig. A), Ì25133 (PI. II, Fig. B), Ì25134 (PI. Ili, Fig.
A) and Ì24802 are embedded laterally. Lateral specimens
provide less information about gladius characteristics. In
comparison to dorsoventral specimens, lateral examples
provide more information about soft-body morphology
than gladius characteristics. The reconstruction in Fig. 4
is only tentative, because each gladius of Dorateuthis is
in a bad condition.
Only in specimen MSNM i25 144 are imprints of a
complete gladius preserved (PI. I, Fig. A). It is embedded
dorsoventrally and seen in dorsal view. The total length of
thè gladius is 7.5 cm. Its anterior end is 0.8 cm in width.
Compared to thè length of other specimens MSNM
Ì25144 is a juvenile (MSNM i25 1 34 is longest with at
least 24 cm). More information about thè maximum width
of other specimens is not worthwhile owing to incomplete
preservation, compaction or lateral embedment.
In MSNM Ì25144 (PI. I, Fig. A) and Ì23108 (PI. I, Fig.
C) pronounced lateral ridges are rounded and ca. 1 mm in
width. Their increase in thickness throughout thè whole
length is insignificant. Both ridges diverge at an angle
of approximately 7°. Lateral ridges must be regarded as
lateral swellings of thè median field.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
7
CO?
lateral dorsal
view view
Fig. 4 - Dorateuthis syriaca. Reconstruction of thè gladius. The mor-
phology of thè posterior gladius end is uncertain. co = conus; lf = lateral
field; Lr = lateral ridge; mf = median field; mr = median ridge.
A distinct median line or ridge can be observed in
specimen MSNM i23 1 08 (PI. I, Fig. C) and Ì26092. In
thè latter thè line is seen to reach thè most anterior end of
thè gladius.
The anteriormost extremity of thè gladius and growth
lines on thè gladius surface are poorly preserved, but there
are no indications for a pointed anterior end.
Imprints on both sides of this posterior end observable
in specimen MSNM i25 144 (PI. I, Fig. B) are probably
imprints of lateral fields (conus fields). If they are indeed
lateral fields they are extremely narrow and short (2 mm
in width and 2.1 cm in length respectively). However, lat¬
eral specimens do not confimi this assumption.
Lateral specimens MSNM Ì24800 (PI. II, Fig. A) and
Ì25133 (PI. II, Fig. B) demonstrate thè originai curvature
of thè gladius, which probably reflects its tension within
thè mantle sac.
Arms: specimens MSNM i25 133, i25 1 34 and Ì26092
exhibit arm preservation. The first two show at least three
arms (PI. II, Fig. B; PI. Ili, Fig. A), thè latter at least four.
In this specimen arms preserved as phosphatised mus-
culature are only fragmentary and apparently tangled. It
seems worthwhile to note that thè diameters of thè arms
are relatively thick. In MSNM Ì26092 one arm is at least
5 cm long. Ultraviolet light supplies no further informa-
tion, so that reliable measuring data are not available.
Neither tentacles, clubs, suckers nor cirri are discemible
anywhere.
Head: in four specimens thè position of thè head can
be presumed (MSNM i25 133, i25 1 34, Ì24800, Ì26092)
from thè buccal mass. Strongly phosphatised structures
between thè arms and thè mantle interpreted as thè buccal
mass are displaced from thè mantle edge. In MSNM
Ì24800 (PI. II, Fig. A), Ì25133 (PI. II, Fig. B) and i25 1 34
(PI. Ili, Fig. A) thè buccal mass is located some distance
in front of thè anterior gladius end. Ultraviolet light
suggests that thè anterior end of thè gladius reaches thè
anterior mantle margin. This indicates that thè head was
apparently demarcated. Beaks were not observed.
Fins: in specimens MSNM i25 128 and i25 134 imprints
of fins are present. In lateral specimen MSNM i25 134 (PI.
Ili, Fig. A) preparation has laid open a ca. 3 cm long weak
lobate structure, which is considered to be a fin. Similar
lobate structures are also present in MSNM i25 128. How¬
ever, in both cases this is not beyond doubt, as ultraviolet
light did not confimi this assumption.
Stomach: in specimen MSNM i25 144 stomach contents
are preserved (PI. I, Fig. A). As in recent coleoids thè stom¬
ach is situated between thè ink sac and thè rear of thè mantle
cavity. Ingested food largely consists of fish remains, so
Dorateuthis was certainly an active predator. As correctly
suggested by Lukeneder & Harzhauser (2005) thè mass of
food indicates thè presence of a crop (caecum).
Remarks: thè Milan specimens of Dorateuthis syriaca
are thè first evidence of this taxon in thè Cenomanian.
However, morphological knowledge about thè genus
Dorateuthis (including both species) is stili comparatively
scarce. This is partly due to a very flimsy gladius. After
re-investigation of thè Holotypes of Dorateuthis syriaca
(PI. Ili, Fig. B) and Dorateuthis sahilalmae (PI. Ili, Fig.
C) and other examples of this genus in collections from
Berlin, Stuttgart, Vienna, Paris and London and compari-
son with thè Milan specimens described herein (including
thè Milan specimens a total amount of 27 specimens of
this genus were investigated) it can be concluded that
only thè lateral ridges and partly thè median ridge have
thè potential to withstand decay. Often we have just
hollow imprints of thè massive lateral ridges. Because of
its narrowness thè median field has apparently no preser-
vational potential. However, long and wide lateral fields
as suggested by Roger (1946) can be excluded. If lateral
fields were present in this genus, they must have been
extremely short and narrow as reconstmcted in Fig. 4.
Further, it cannot be ruled out that thè gladius is some-
times disrupted longitudinally. In thè author’s opinion,
differing information about apical angles ranging from
7° to 25° is a result of disruption and distortions. In
spite of this observation, thè two representatives of thè
genus are differentiated by means of their apical angles.
According to Engeser & Reitner (1986: 4) D. sahilalmae
(PI. Ili, Fig. C) is mainly distinguished from D. syriaca
by a larger apical angle and a bigger ink sac. The latter
is here considered to be highly dependent on thè volume
of ink within thè sac just before death and on random
preservational compaction. None of thè 27 specimens of
Dorateuthis investigated showed a correlation between
ink sac size and thè apical angle. Thus an unambiguous
character distinguishing D. sahilalmae from D. syriaca is
stili missing.
8
DIRK FUCHS
Re-investigation of thè arms of thè Holotypes of D.
syriaca Woodward, 1883 as well as D. sahilalmae Naef,
1922 has shown that this genus is certainly an eight-
armed coleoid. A specimen from thè Naturhistorisches
Museum Wien exhibits thè best-preserved arm crown
consisting of eight distinct arms (PI. II, Fig. C, originai
of Lukeneder & Harzhauser, 2004). There are absolutely
no indications for thè presence of tentacles as proposed
by Woodward (1883). However, in cases where arm mus-
culature is preserved it appears that some animals had
well-developed, fleshy arms (c.f. MSNM Ì26092), while
others seem to have had comparably thin arms (PI. II, Fig.
C; PI. Ili, Fig. B). A tentati ve ontogenetical correlation for
thickest and longest arms is observed in specimens with a
gladius longer than 20 cm. On thè other hand, thinner and
shorter arms are associated with gladii shorter than 10 cm.
Therefore different ontogenetical stages might explain
variable arm morphology. Altematively, inconsistencies
are more likely due to incorrect preparation or incomplete
preservation than to a specific or an ontogenetic charac-
ter. Unsuccessful correlation between arm thickness and
gladius characteristics confirms these considerations. As
a result, presence of two species within thè genus Dora-
teuthis remains doubtful.
Likewise, no distinct differences were found between
specimens from Hjoula, and Sàhel Aalma. Thus, gladius,
ink sac and arm morphology are stili useless as distin-
guishing characters. From Hàqel Dorateuthis is stili
unknown. Perhaps, thè undescribed material housed in
thè Black Hills Institute may provide additional informa-
tion. Until then, confirmation of two separated species
from Sàhel Aalma as well as erection of a new species
from Hjoula would be premature.
Suborder Teudopsidina Starobogatov, 1983
Family Palaeololiginidae Naef, 1921
Genus Rachiteuthis (n. gen.)
Derivatio nominis: from rachis-like appearance of thè
gladius.
Type species: Rachiteuthis donovani (n. sp., by mono-
typy)-
Locus typicus: Hjoula (Lebanon).
Stratum typicum: Lithographic Limestones of Hjoùla,
Upper Cenomanian.
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: known only
from thè locus typicus and stratum typicum.
Diagnosis: palaeololiginid with a spear- or shaft-like
gladius; lateral fields spread out and short with a weak
hyperbolar zone; conus reduced; free rachis elongated;
distinct lateral ridges and a median unomamented keel
extend from posterior to anterior extremities; body tor-
pedo-shaped; insertions of triangular fins comparatively
broad; arms comparatively slender.
Remarks: thè genus is placed within thè Palaeololigi¬
nidae because of common possession of a sharply pointed
free rachis. Presence of lateral ridges similar to members
of thè Plesioteuthididae may also imply an affiliation to
these forms. However, in contrast to thè ventrally closed
true conus of Plesioteuthis, thè new genus shows a
reduced (opened) conus with outspread lateral fields.
Rachiteuthis donovani (n. sp.) (Pls. IV- VI)
1977 “PlesioteuthisA ike gladii” - Donovan, p. 40.
Derivatio nominis: thè name is in honour of D. T.
Donovan and his exceptional merits in palaeontological
malacology.
Holotype: MSNM Ì25142 (PI. IV).
Paratype I: MSNM i25 135 (PI. V, Fig. A).
Paratype II: MSNM Ì25139 (PI. V, Fig. B).
Locus typicus: Hjoùla (Lebanon).
Stratum typicum: Lithographic Limestones of Hjoùla,
Upper Cenomanian.
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: known only
from thè locus typicus and stratum typicum.
Remarks: in 2002 Novati already recognized and sug-
gested this new taxon, but never described it. The taxon
name was therefore a nomen nudum. Present author
decided to keep thè taxon name and to present thè first
description of Rachiteuthis.
Material: five specimens were investigated: MSNM
Ì25142, Ì25139, Ì25135, i25132a+b and Ì25143. The
latter specimen is a juvenile and provides little additional
information, but thè former are adult and each of them
bears interesting features. Specimen MSNM i25 142 is
selected as thè Holotype because a complete gladius with
detailed structural morphology is preserved. Although thè
gladius of Paratype I (MSNM i25 135) is only preserved
as imprints, this specimen exhibits extraordinary soft-part
preservation, including arms, head, fiinnel, ink sac and
fins. Paratype II shows thè lateral view of this taxon.
Description
Gladius: thè Holotype (PI. IV) exhibits by far thè
best-preserved gladius. Because it is completely dorsov-
entrally embedded, thè obtained measurements are highly
usable (data from gladii of thè Paratypes are ambiguous
for they are more or less laterally compressed and are thus
not considered here). Additionally, gladius characteristics
of thè Holotype are preserved 3-dimensionally (Fig. 5).
Imprints of thè ventral surface are visible where gla¬
dius material is missing. The Holotypes gladius dimen-
sions (Fig. 5) are as following:
- gladius length (gl): 5.7 cm
- lateral field length (lfl): 1.3 cm
- median field width (mfwjf) at thè end of thè lateral fields:
0.35 cm
- maximum median field width (mfwmax): 0.59 cm
- maximum lateral field width (lfw): 0.82 cm
- lateral field length/gladius length (lfl/gl): 0.23
- median field width/gladius length (mfwmax /gl): 0.1
- median field width/gladius length (mfwjf /gl): 0.06
- lateral field width/lateral field length (lfw/lfl): 0.6
- apical angle (angle of diverging inner asymptotes): 8°
Lateral field length (lfl) accounts for 23% of total gla¬
dius length (gl). In other investigated specimens it varies
between 23 and 26%, but as already mentioned, this is pre-
sumably due to different degree of compaction. An unde-
termined specimen from Hjoùla in thè Museum of Naturai
History in London (Donovan, 1977: 40, “ plesioteuthis-like
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
M-mfw-H
Fig. 5 - Rachiteuthis donovani. Reconstruction of thè gladius. fri = free rachis length; gl = gladius length; ia = inner asymptote; lf =
lateral field; lfl = lateral field length; lfw = lateral field width; Ir = lateral ridge; mf = median field; mfw = median field width; mk =
median keel.
gladii”; register number BMNH C 28408) is identical with
thè present taxon and shows thè same lfl/gl - ratio of 0.23.
The maximum width of thè median field (mfwmax) is
0.59 cm, measured half way along thè rachis-like median
field (free rachis). This yields an mfwmax/gl - ratio of 0. 1 .
The anterior extremity of thè gladius is sharply pointed.
From posterior to anterior a constantly 0.7 mm thick
rounded massive keel is prominent on thè median field.
Imprints of thè ventral gladius surface in thè anterior part
(where gladius material is missing) show that thè median
keel is ventrally two-parted (see cross-section Fig. 5; PI.
IV, Fig. B). Since these structures are not present on thè
dorsal surface, thè ventral surface differs from thè dorsal
surface. On both sides of thè keel lateral ridges form out-
ermost margins. These are also counter drawn on thè ven¬
tral surface, as shown by imprints where gladius material
is not preserved (PI. IV, Fig. B).
The lateral fields appear very thin, marginally even
translucent. Growth lines on thè dorsal surface of both
lateral fields can be easily traced but exhibit just a weakly
curved hyperbolar zone (PI. IV, Fig. C). This implies that
outer asymptotes are present but inconspicuous. Inner
asymptotes divide thè lateral and thè median field and are
thus well marked by lateral ridges. Lateral ridges diverge
at an angle of 8°.
Arms: as already mentioned, especially Paratype I
(Fig. 6; PI. V, Fig. A; PI. VI, Fig. B) displays an arm
crown contrasting with thè surrounding colour of sedi-
ment (surprisingly they are not preserved as phosphatised
musculature). At least six arms can be counted. A seventh
arm is only visible under ultraviolet light (PI. VI, Fig. B).
They are all uniform and slender (approximately 5 cm in
length and 0.3 mm in diameter).
In Paratype II (PI. V, Fig. B; PI. VI, Fig. C), arms
are preserved as 3-dimensional ridges similar to those
described from Miinstere/la scutellaris (Fuchs et al.,
2003: 4). As in lateral specimens of M. scutellaris, ultra¬
violet light reveals thè phosphatised musculature of four
arms, which are considered to be thè right arms of each
pair. There is no indication of an arm web between thè
Fig. 6 - Rachiteuthis donovani. Drawing of Paratype I (MSNM i25 135).
ac = arm crown; bm = buccal mass; f = fin; fu = funnel; g = gladius; is
- ine sac.
10
DIRK FUCHS
ridges. At least thè inner surface of one left arm is pre-
served (most probably thè ventrolateral arm). Tentacles,
tentacle clubs, suckers or cirri are not observable in any
of thè specimens.
Head: neither in thè Holotype nor in thè Paratypes is
there any reason to suppose a clearly demarcated head. In
both Paratypes it seems that dorsal arm bases are a direct
continuation of thè dorsal mantle edge (Pls. V and VI).
A head-mantle fusion would imply that thè head was not
clearly demarcated.
From specimens of Miinsterella scutellaris (Fuchs et
al, 2003: 4) it was demonstrated that head retraction was
possible in this taxon. Similar abilities are assumed for
Rachiteuthis. The arm bases of both Paratypes He very
dose to thè anterior end of thè gladius, which should
mark thè anterior mantle edge. The buccal mass of Para-
type I is obviously situated within thè mantle (PI. V, Fig.
A). Subsequently thè head must have been retracted.
This is not thè case in thè Holotype, where thè head is
apparently a short distance in front of thè anterior end of
thè gladius and thus presumably stretcbed out. A head
retractor muscle, which is observed in Miinsterella, is not
preserved.
Beaks: a weak parabolic structure within thè head
region of thè Holotype is determined as a lower or upper
beak but contains no reai morphological information as
obtained from Trachyteuthis, Plesioteuthis or Lepto-
teuthis from Nusplingen (Klug et al., 2005).
Body outline: exceptional preservation of Paratype
I allows statements about thè complete body outline
of Rachiteuthis (PI. V, Fig. A). The body was appar¬
ently twisted during diagenesis. Although thè funnel
and soft-body are laterally embedded, gladius and fins
are seen in dorsal view. During decay, thè stiff gladius
must have penetrated thè anterior mantle. However, it
is assumed that thè body was nearly circular in cross-
section and comparatively longish and slender (tor-
pedo-shaped).
Funnel: funnel preservation is extremely rare even in
Konservat-Lagerstàtten. In Paratype I (Fig. 6; PI. V, Fig.
A) a structure determined as thè fiinnel is situated beneath
thè anterior part of thè gladius. It is 0.6 cm in diameter.
The length is difficult to define. It is obvious that ink was
ejected through thè funnel. Like thè head, thè funnel
seems to be retracted.
Fins: although phosphatised musculature is missing in
Paratype I, posteriorly a triangular outline of paired fins
is clearly visible (Fig. 6; PI. V, Fig. A). The outer corners
are distinctly rounded. They begin with thè posteriormost
extremity of thè gladius and end 4.5 cm anterior to this
point. Their rounded margins are 4.8 cm apart.
Differential diagnosis: gladius characteristics such
as opened conus with comparatively short lateral fìelds,
presence of a hyperbolar zone on thè lateral fìelds as well
as a distinctly pointed anterior end justify thè taxonomic
position within thè Teudopsidina.
The presence of a median keel and paired lateral
ridges in connection with a shaft-like prolongation of thè
rachis-like median field resembles Palaeololigo oblon-
gata Wagner, 1 859 or P. albersdoerferi Engeser & Keupp,
1999 from thè Lithographic Limestones of Solnhofen. In
contrast, thè free rachis of Rachiteutis is much longer and
thè hyperbolar zone is less distinct than in Palaeololigo.
A median keel and lateral ridges also occur in forms like
Plesioteuthis and Dorateuthis. Compared to these forms
lateral fìelds of Rachiteuthis do not form a closed conus
but are clearly spread out.
Family Trachyteuthididae Naef, 1921
Genus Trachyteuthis v. Meyer, 1 846
(= Coccoteuthis Owen, 1855; Voltzia Schevill, 1950;
junior subjective synonyms)
Type species: Sepia hastiformis Riippell, 1829 (by
subsequent designation (Bulow-Trummer, 1920: 248).
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: previous
records of thè genus Trachyteuthis are from thè Callovian
of Christian Malford, England (Martill & Hudson, 1994),
thè Oxfordian of Chile (Schulze, 1989), Graham Land
of Antarctica (Doyle, 1991) and Vinales region of Cuba
(Schevill, 1950), thè Upper Kimmeridge of Dorset, Eng¬
land (Donovan, 1977) and Nusplingen, Germany (Klug
et al., 2005), thè Tithonian of Solnhofen and thè Volga
region in Russia (Hecker & Hecker, 1955), thè Aptian of
Northwest Queensland, Australia (Wade, 1993) and Heli-
goland, Germany (Engeser & Reitner, 1985).
As thè following descriptions show, we are now able
to extend thè stratigraphical range of Trachyteuthis at
least up to thè Upper Cenomanian.
Remarks: many workers have considered this genus to
be a decabrachian, because of granulation on thè dorsal
surface of thè gladius similar to recent cuttlebones of
Sepia (Donovan, 1977; Doyle, 1991). Despite hundreds
of well-preserved specimens from Nusplingen and Sol¬
nhofen there are no indications for a chambered complex
associated with thè gladius. Additionaly, specimens with
ten arms have never been observed. Finally, Donovan
(2002) presented a specimen of Trachyteuthis with two
pairs of fins. This character is only shared with thè recent
Vampyroteuthis inferna/is. Except granulation, charac-
teristic features for a decabrachian affiliation are absent.
Therefore Trachyteuthis must ultimately be treated as a
reai representative of thè Vampyropoda (Bandel & Leich,
1986; Doyle et al., 1994; Donovan, 2002; Haas, 2002;
Bizikov, 2004).
Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis Riippel, 1829 (PI. VII)
Holotype: Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt/Main (Ge¬
rmany), register number XI 1328.
Locus typicus: Lithographic Limestones of Solnho¬
fen.
Stratum typicum: Lithographic Limestones of Solnho¬
fen, Lower Tithonian (Malm, £ 2b).
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: as for thè
genus (?).
Material: MSNM Ì20591 (PI. VII), MSNM Ì20590 and
MSNM Ì25145 come from thè locality of Hàqel.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
11
Description
In each specimen parts of thè gladius as well as mantle
musculature are preserved. Neither ink sac, fin, head nor
arm crown are observable in any of thè specimens.
In MSNM Ì25145 mainly muscular mantle is pre¬
served. The total length of this specimen is 26 cm. In most
places musculature traces thè outline of thè anterior part
of thè gladius. Marginai remains of thè gladius are stili
present at thè anteriormost end, and one can follow thè
characteristically pointed anterior margin of thè Trachy-
teuthis gladius. At a distance of 14 cm from this margin at
a small spot in thè median line, characteristic growth lines
are “shining” through thè musculature. Specimen MSNM
Ì20590 is in such a poor condition that its identification as
Trachyteuthis is merely presumed.
Specimen MSNM Ì20591 (Fig. 7; PI. XII) displays a
complete outline of thè gladius. The gladius was embed-
ded dorsally and is seen in ventral view. The majority of
gladius material is originally preserved. Imprints of thè
dorsal surface are visible, where gladius material is miss-
ing. Measurements are as follows:
- gladius length (gl): 36.0 cm
- lateral field length (lfl): 14.5 cm
- median field width (mfwif) at thè anterior end of thè
lateral fields: 9.0 cm
- maximum lateral field width (lfwmax): 13.0 cm
- lateral field length/gladius length (lfl/gl): 0.4
- maximum median field width/gladius length (mfwmax/
gl): 0.25
- maximum lateral field width/lateral field length (lfwmax/
lfl): 0.9
Owing to thè ventral view there is nothing visible from
thè typical dorsal granulation. However, at thè posterior-
most end of thè gladius weak imprints of granulations are
visible similar to those of Trachyteuthis hastiformis from
Solnhofen and Nusplingen.
Although thè ends of thè lateral fields are well pre¬
served, a hyperbolar zone (as thè transition from thè
lateral fields into thè median field) is indistinct. As a
result inner and outer asymptotes are merely conjec-
turable. Inner asymptotes diverge at an apical angle of
approximately 37°. Inner asymptotes are commonly
defined as thè end of thè lateral fields. Diverging struc-
tures on thè median field should not be mistaken for
inner asymptotes. The area between these structures is
considered to be thè granulated part of thè median field.
This granulated median part is stronger developed than
marginai parts of thè median field and diverges at an
angle of approximately 10°. A well-preserved dorsal
view of a Trachyteuthis- gladius from Nusplingen, illus-
trated in Klug et al. (2005), displays an identical dorsal
strengthening.
Each ratio enumerated above as well as thè apical
angle fits well within thè ranges known from specimens
from Solnhofen and Nusplingen.
Differential diagnosis: present specimens are unam-
biguous representatives of thè genus Trachyteuthis and
are very dose to T. hastiformis from Solnhofen and
Nusplingen. Compared to a dose relative from Hàqel and
Sàhel Aalma, Glyphiteuthis ( =Libanoteuthis , see below),
Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis differs in its much bigger
dimensions and thè lack of a median keel.
dorsal view posterolateral view
Fig. 7 - Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis. Reconstruction of thè gladius. cl = conus length; ga = granulated area; gl = gladius length; hz =
hyperbolar zone; ia = inner asymptote; lf = lateral field; lfl = lateral field length; lfw = lateral field width; mf = median field; mfw =
median field width; oa - outer asymptote.
12
DIRK FUCHS
Remarks: an unusual high number of specific names
exist in thè literature for forms of Trachyteuthis hasti-
formis from thè Solnhofener Plattenkalks. Although
Engeser (1988) regarded them altogether in synonymy,
thè presence of more than only one morphospecies cannot
be ruled out (Fuchs, 2006). Further, species of thè genus
Trachyteuthis from other locations than Solnhofen cannot
be clearly distinguished from T. hastiformis by means of
adequate characters. Finally, there are no distinct differ-
ences in proportions even between Jurassic and Creta-
ceous examples. Since thè fìrst occurrence of thè genus
in thè middle Jurassic no modifications are observable at
fìrst glance. As already mentioned by Donovan (1995) a
comparative examination is necessary in order to specify
morphological differences. Therefore, these specimens are
provisionally determined as Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis.
Genus Glyphiteuthis Reuss, 1854 (Pls. VIII-IX)
Type species: Glyphiteuthis ornata Reuss, 1854.
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: Lower/
Middle Turonian of Bilà Hora Formation (Czech Repub-
lic), Upper Cenomanian of Lebanon and Normandy
(France), Upper Santonian of Sàhel Aalma (Lebanon).
Remarks: previously nobody has referred to thè dif-
ficult morphological distinction between thè Turonian
genus Glyphiteuthis Reuss, 1854 from Bohemia (Czech
Republic) and Libanoteuthis Kretzoi, 1942 from Hàqel,
Hjoula and Sàhel Aalma. Kretzoi (1942) erected Liba¬
noteuthis without any descriptive explanations. While
Roger (1946), Rioult (1962), Waage (1965), Engeser &
Reitner (1986) and Engeser (1988) have used this genus
name, Jeletzky (1966) and Donovan (1977) have placed
this taxon within thè genus Trachyteuthis. Certainly, there
are enough morphological differences between thè genera
Libanoteuthis and Trachyteuthis. Especially thè anterior
end of thè Trachyteuthis-gìadius is completely different
from Libanoteuthis. Instead, dose affinities to Glyphi¬
teuthis should be discussed. Re-investigations of speci¬
mens of Glyphiteuthis ornata (specimens of G. minor are
considered to be juveniles of G. ornata) and specimens of
“ Libanoteuthis ” libanotica yielded equal gladius propor¬
tions. In thè Turonian specimens it seems that thè median
ridge is more developed than in Cenomanian specimens.
However, this is possibly due to thè flattened specimens
of thè Lebanese “fish beds” in comparison to a 3-dimen-
sional preservation in thè Bilà Hora Formation (Bohemia).
In any case, there are only few arguments for separating
specimens of Glyphiteuthis and Libanoteuthis in different
genera. Therefore Libanoteuthis should be considered as
a junior synonym of Glyphiteuthis.
Assigned species: Glyphiteuthis ornata (= minori),
G. libanotica and G. boutillieri.
Glyphiteuthis (= Libanoteuthis) libanotica Fraas, 1878
(PI. Vili, Figs. A-B; PI. IX)
1878 Geoteuthis libanotica - Fraas, p. 345, PI. 6, Fig. 3.
1896 Geoteuthis libanoticus - Woodward, p. 23 1 .
1920 Geoteuthis libanotica Fraas - Bulow-Trummer, p.
255.
1922 Trachyteuthis libanotica (Fraas, 1878)-Naef, p. 140,
Fig. 49b.
1942 Libanoteuthis libanotica Fraas - Kretzoi, p. 125,
Fig. 1.12, p. 134.
? 1 946 Geoteuthis sahel-alma (Fraas) (Naef) - Roger, p. 1 6,
Fig. 9.
1946 Trachyteuthis libanotica (Fraas) - Roger, p. 17, Fig.
10.
1952 Libanoteuthis libanotica Fraas - Roger, p. 740.
1 962 Libanoteuthis libanotica (Fraas) - Rioult, p. 1 1 , Fig.
lb.
1966 Trachyteuthis (Libanoteuthis) libanotica Kretzoi,
1942 - Jeletzky, p. 45.
1977 Trachyteuthis libanotica (Fraas) - Donovan, p. 32.
1986 Libanoteuthis libanotica (Fraas, 1878) - Engeser &
Reitner, p. 7, Fig. 2, PI. 2, Figs. 1, 2.
1988 Libanoteuthis libanotica (Fraas, 1878) - Engeser,
p. 69.
Holotype: Fraas (1878: PI. Vili, Fig. B), Staatliches
Museum fur Naturkunde, Stuttgart (SMNS 26271).
Locus typicus: Hàqel, Lebanon.
Stratum typicum: Upper Cenomanian.
Geographic and stratigraphic distribution: Upper Ce¬
nomanian of Hàqel and Hjoùla, Upper Santonian of Sàhel
Aalma, (Lebanon).
For a long time Glyphiteuthis libanotica has been known
only from Hàqel, but Engeser & Reitner (1986: 9) consid¬
ered thè possibility that Naef (1922) mistook thè localities
of his specimens from thè Noetling collection (Noetling,
1 886), which were believed to derive from Sàhel Aalma.
This implies that this genus occurs up to thè Santonian.
Material: eighteen specimens identified as Glyphi¬
teuthis libanotica belong to thè MSNM-collection and
were investigated: MSNM i25 138 (PI. IX, Fig. A), Ì24801
(PI. IX, Fig. B), Ì25127 (PI. Vili, Fig. A), Ì24959, Ì20589,
Ì24957, Ì20588, i20857a+b, Ì25136, Ì25130, Ì12599,
Ì25137, i25131a+b, Ì24958, Ì23434, Ì25129, Ì26734,
Ì23422. Except MSNM Ì2480, which comes from Hjoùla,
all specimens originate from Hàqel.
Description
Gladius: dimensions of eight dorsoventrally embed-
ded specimens are completely preserved and are therefore
available for comparative measurements (Fig. 8).
With gladius lengths of 4-8 cm, all measured speci¬
mens are small compared to Glyphiteuthis ornata and
Trachyteuthis. Lateral field length (lfl) is between 1.4-3. 4
cm. The ratio of lateral fìeld length to gladius length (lfl/
gl) varies slightly between 0.36-0.4. Maximum width of
thè lateral field (lfwmax) is between 1.3-2. 6 cm. In cross-
section thè lateral fields are almost hemi-circular. The
ratio maximum lateral field width to lateral field length
is between 0.9-1. Especially specimen MSNM i25 1 27
exhibits a precise gladius outline (PI. Vili, Fig. A). This
specimen clearly shows a sharply pointed anterior end as
well as a slight lateral constriction in thè anterior third of
thè gladius.
In specimens MSNM i25 1 30, Ì24958 and Ì24959 an
indistinct but prominent median ridge or even keel (“Mittel-
linie” of Engeser & Reitner (1986: 7) is present. In contrast
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
13
dorsal view
Fig. 8 - Glyphiteuthis (= Libanoteuthis ) libanotica. Reconstruction
of thè gladius. ga= granulateci area; hz = hyperbolar zone; ia = inner
asymptote; lf = lateral field; lfl = lateral field length; mf = median field;
mk = median keel; oa = outer asymptote.
to observations by Engeser & Reitner (1986) thè median
ridge runs continuously from posterior to anterior. After re-
investigation of thè Holotype of Glyphiteuthis libanotica it
must be assumed that thè lack of a posterior median ridge
in this specimen is due to incomplete preservation.
MSNM Ì24959 displays dorsal imprints of granula-
tions. In this specimen one row of coarse granules is
visible along thè median ridge. Smoother granules flank
thè median ridge on both sides. Additional ridges similar
to those assumed in Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis (see
above) strictly delimit thè granulation. They diverge
with an angle of 20°. As in Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis
it seems that thè granulated area in MSNM i25 138 is
slightly elevated above thè rest of thè gladius surface (PI.
IX, Fig. A). In thè middle part of thè gladius thè ridges
become indistinct and thè granulation broadens. In thè
anterior third of thè gladius it almost reaches thè marginai
edges (MSNM Ì20589).
Preservation of growth lines is weak (MSNM i25 138).
In some specimens imprints of growth lines are preserved
(MSNM Ì24958). It seems that growth lines have a weak
curvature, and so thè hyperbolar zone is indistinct. Inner
and outer asymptotes are therefore imaginary.
Arms: in at least ten specimens (MSNM Ì24957,
Ì24958, Ì25129, i25131a+b, Ì24959, Ì24801, Ì25130,
Ì25138, i20587a+b, il 2599) arms are more or less pre¬
served as outstanding discolorations. Phosphatised arm
musculature is only preserved in MSNM Ì20875 but
counting has proved to be difficult. Although a complete
arm crown is absent, each specimen suggests that these
animals had relatively long and slender arms (PI. IX, Fig.
B). Average arm thickness is 0.2 mm. Absolute arm length
could not be determined. Tentacles or tentacle clubs are
never present.
Suckers: few imprints of suckers are discemible in
specimen MSNM i25 130. It is not possible to determine
thè position of suckers (for instance, if they are arranged
in one, two or more rows). Presumably they form distai
suckers. They are almost 1 mm in diameter and radiai in
shape. Cirri are never observed.
Head: in each specimen where remains of arms are
visible remains of thè head can be assumed by thè posi¬
tion of thè buccal mass.
At least two specimens (MSNM il 2599, in ventral
view and Ì24801, in lateral view) exhibit a circular whit-
ish structure in thè head region, strongly phosphatising
under ultraviolet light (PI. IX, Figs. B-C). This structure is
determined as thè muscular buccal mass. In both cases it
almost touches thè anterior end of thè gladius. This might
indicate a retractable head. Other specimens confimi this
assumption. However, it can not be decided if thè head
was clearly demarcated.
Beaks: beaks occur in several specimens but provide
no information about their detailed morphology owing to
strong compaction.
Fins: absolutely no indications about fin morphology
are present, neither in specimens of this collection nor in
specimens from other collections.
Remarks: as mentioned above thè ratio lateral field length
to gladius length (lfl/gl) varies between 0.36-0.40. The
Holotype of Glyphiteuthis libanotica was measured by thè
author and thè lfl/gl-ratio of 0.38 from thè Holotype fits well
into this range. It must be emphasised that measurements
of flattened (originally 3-dimensional) structures always
contain errors because thè rates of flattening usually differ.
Nevertheless, at least one dorso ventral ly flattened speci¬
men (MSNM Ì25131) with a lateral field length to gladius
length ratio (lfl/gl) of 0.3 gives thè impression that probably
two morphotypes occur. Though this cannot be statistically
proved, it seems that there is 1) a stouter form with circa
38% and 2) a more slender form with lateral field length
of circa 30% of thè gladius length. Possibly arm length is a
second distinguishing character, but present specimens do
not provide sufificient infonnation. Additional gladii with
well-preserved soft-parts are therefore necessary.
Differential diagnosis: according to Engeser & Reitner
(1986) co-existing G. boutillieri differ from G. libanotica
by a solid median ridge and a specific median field. As
shown above in G. libanotica thè median ridge is con-
tinuous, too. Judging from thè drawings of Lennier (1886)
and Rioult (1962) likewise no difference conceming thè
median field is recognizable. Riegraf (1987) takes into
consideration that G. libanotica is a junior synonym of G.
boutillieri. In order to define specific differences between
these two forms a re-investigation of thè Holotype of G.
boutillieri is necessary.
G. ornata possesses a ribbed median keel especially
in thè anterior third of thè gladius (Kostak, 2002). In G.
libanotica we have found no indications for ribs.
14
DIRK FUCHS
PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS
Since evidences for a dose affiliation of fossil gladii
with recent Vampyroteuthis and octopods have accumu-
lated in recent decades (Bandel & Leich, 1986; Haas,
2002; Donovan et al., 2003; Bizikov, 2004; Fuchs, 2006),
“fossil teuthids” are unknown in thè fossil record.
According to Engeser & Reitner (1986), Bandel &
Leich (1986) and Engeser (1988) Prototeuthina, Loli-
gosepiina and Teudopsidina (= Mesoteuthina) represent
stem-lineage representatives of thè Vampyromorpha.
In contrast Haas (2002) considers them as stem-line-
age representatives of all Vampyropoda. Bizikov (2004)
assumes that thè Loligosepiina are thè stem group of thè
Vampyropoda and that teudopsid forms are stem-lineage
representatives of thè Octobrachia.
However, on thè basis of hundreds of vampyropod
gladii from different localities and stratigraphic levels a
comparative study suggests that only thè Prototeuthina
(Paraplesioteuthis, Plesioteuthis, Dorateuthis) should be
regarded as stem-lineage representatives of thè Vampyro¬
poda (Fuchs, 2006). Most probably thè ventrally opened
conus of thè Loligosepiina and thè Teudopsidina is a
derivation of a closed conus (as in Paraplesioteuthis and
Plesioteuthis) inherited from a phragmoteuthid ancestor
(Fig. 9).
Compared to thè Loligosepiina, Teudopsidina show
a generai tendency to reduce their median fields (Haas,
2002; Bizikov, 2004). Since thè gladius rudiments of
incirrate octopods ( Palaeoctopus newboldi) are proved
to be thè result of a progressive reduction of thè median
field, Teudopsidina should indeed be considered as stem-
lineage representatives of thè Octobrachia.
Recent Vampyroteuthis infernalis exhibits gladius
characteristics that can easily be derived from a loli-
gosepiid gladius, which is why Loligosepiina are believed
to be thè stem group of thè Vampyromorpha (Fuchs,
2006).
It must be pointed out that thè Lithographic Lime-
stones of Hàqel, Hjoula and Sàhel Aalma apparently do
not contain unambiguous representatives of thè Decabra-
chia despite its extraordinary preservational potential.
VAMPYROMORPHA CIRROCTOPODA OCTOPODA
Fig. 9 - Basic phylogeny of thè Vampyropoda.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
15
CONCLUSIONS
Although well-preserved coleoids from Lebanon
were already praised during thè nineteenth century, pre-
vious information about diversity and morphology was
scarce. The great number of Lebanese coleoids enables
to enlarge thè diversity up to six species ( Acanthoteuthis
syriaca, Palaeoctopus newboldi, Dorateuthis syriaca,
Rachiteuthis donovani, Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis,
Glyphiteuthis libanotica ) and to increase thè morphologi-
cal understanding of most of them.
Hàqel, Hjoula, and Sàhel Aalma exhibit a vampyropod
diversity that consists of a mixture of conservative and
modified species. Especially thè discovery of Trachy¬
teuthis demonstrates a remarkable evolutionary stability
within this genus from thè Jurassic up to thè Late Creta-
ceous. Glyphiteuthis displays only a slight modification of
a typical teudopsid gladius.
The gladius of Rachiteuthis can be seen as a modifìca-
tion of a palaeololiginid gladius. Whereas thè posterior
part of thè gladius with its lateral fields is more or less
unmodified thè rachis-like median fìeld is strongly elon-
gated compared to Palaeololigo.
The gladius of Dorateuthis must be considered as
a moderate modification, which derived from a Ple-
sioteuthis-Mke gladius. Plesioteuthis possesses a reduced
but ventrally closed conus with short lateral fields. The
median field is comparatively narrow but well developed.
In Dorateuthis, in contrast, thè median field seems to
be only membranous with a very poor preservational
potential. In this way thè sturdy lateral ridges exclusively
provide for thè construction of thè gladius and thus for thè
longitudinal rigidity of thè mantle cavity. Morphological
knowledge about thè conus of Dorateuthis is poor, but it
seems that it is distinctly reduced.
Except in extraordinary Konservat-Lagerstàtten such
as Christian Malford, Holzmaden, Solnhofen and Leba¬
non, coleoid records are often sporadic (except belemnite
rostra). Owing to bad preservational conditions, morpho¬
logical comparisons between fragmentary specimens are
usually problematic. This remarkable coleoid collection
from Hàqel stored in thè Museo di Civico di Storia Natu¬
rale di Milano demonstrates thè advantages and espe¬
cially thè importance of a suffìcient number of specimens
in order to verify earlier assumptions and to present a reli-
able morphological and taxonomical evaluation.
Unfortunately, an adequate Konservat-Lagerstàtte is
missing between thè “evolutive Windows” Solnhofen
(Tithonian) and Sàhel Aalma (Santonian). Sàhel Aalma
forms thè last “evolutive window” in thè earth history
for we do not have any Konservat-Lagerstàtte containing
coleoids during thè Cenozoic (coleoids are apparently
unknown in Monte Bolca). Present results demonstrate
thè enormous significale of Hàqel, Hjoùla, and Sàhel
Aalma for thè reconstruction of thè evolutionary history
of vampyropods. Interestingly, no information about cole¬
oids from Nàmmoura is available.
Most probably, present contributions are preliminary,
because additional information about Lebanese coleoids
is expected from another 80 specimens housed in thè
Black Hills Museum of Naturai History in Hill City
(South Dakota, USA).
Acknowledgments
Present work was funded by thè Deutsche Forschungs-
gesellschaft (DFG). Special thanks go to A. Garassino and
G. Teruzzi (both from thè Museo Civico di Storia Naturale
di Milano) who enabled me to investigate thè collection.
I am grateful to Neal L. Larson (Black Hills Institute)
for his thorough reading of thè manuscript as well as his
constructive suggestions for its improvement.
16
DIRK FUCHS
REFERENCES
Allison P. A., 1988 - Konservat-Lagerstàtten: cause and
classification. Pa/eobiology, 14 (4): 331-344.
Allison P. A. & Briggs D. E. G., 1991 - Taphonomy of
Nonmineralized Tissues. In: Taphonomy: Releasing
thè Data Locked in thè Fossil Record. Allison P. A. &
Briggs D. E. G. (eds.). Plenum Press, New York: 25-70.
Bandel K. & Leich H., 1986 - Jurassic Vampyromorpha
(dibranchiate cephalopods). Neues Jahrbuch fiir Geol¬
ogie und Palàontologie, Mh., 1986 (3): 129-148.
Bizikov V. A., 2004 - The shell in Vampyropoda (Cepha-
lopoda): morphology, functional role and evolution.
Ruthenica supplement, 3: 1-88.
Boletzky S. V., 1 999 - Biologie et biogeographie des cepha-
lopodes actuels. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de
France, 170 (2): 205-215.
Boletzky S. V., 2003 - Biology of Early Life Stages in
Cephalopod Molluscs. Advances in marine Biology,
44: 143-203.
Bracchi G. & Alessandrello A., 2005 - Paleodiversity of
thè free living polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) and
description of new taxa from thè Upper Cretaceous
Lagerstàtten of Haqel, Hadjula and Al-Namoura
(Lebanon). Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze
Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di
Milano, XXXII (III): 1-48.
Biilow-Trummer E. V., 1 920 - Cephalopoda dibranchiata.
Fossilium Catalogus, Animalia. Pars 11, Berlin.
Caldwell M. W., 2006 - A new species of Pontosaurus
(Squamata, Pythonomorpha) from thè Upper Cre¬
taceous of Lebanon and a phylogenetic analysis of
Pythonomorpha. Memorie della Società Italiana di
Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Natu¬
rale di Milano, 34 (3).
Dalla Vecchia F. M. & Venturini S., 1999 - The middle
Cenomanian Lagerstàtte of Al Nammoura (Kesrouane
Caza, N. Lebanon). Ili International Symposium on
Lithographic Limestones, extended abstracts. Rivista
del Museo Civico di Scienze Naturali “E. Caffi ”, Ber¬
gamo, 20: 75-78.
Dalla Vecchia F. M., Arduini P. & Kellner A. W. A., 2001
- The first pterosaur from thè Cenomanian (Late Creta¬
ceous) Lagerstatten of Lebanon. Cretaceous Research,
22: 219-225.
Dalla Vecchia F. M., Venturini S. & Tentor M., 2002 - The
Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) Konservat-Lagerstatte of
en Nammoura (Kesrouane Province), northem Lebanon.
Bolletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 41 : 5 1-68.
Dal Sasso C. & Pinna G., 1997 - Aphanizocnemus liba-
nensis n. gen. n. sp., a new dolichosaur (Reptilia
Varanoidea) from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon.
Paleontologia Lombarda, n. s., VII: 1-31.
Doguzhaeva L. A. & Mutvei H., 2003 - Gladius composi-
tion and ultrastructure in extinct squid-like coleoids
Loligosepia, Trachyteuthis and Teudopsis. Revue de
Paleobiologie, 22 (2): 877-894.
Donovan D. T., 1977 - Evolution of thè dibranchiate
Cephalopoda. Symposia of thè Zoologica/ Society of
London, 38: 15-48.
Donovan D. T., 1 995 - A specimen of Trachyteuthis (Cole¬
oidea) with fins from thè upper Jurassic of Solnhofen
(Bavaria). Stuttgarter Beitràge zur Naturkunde, Serie
B, 235: 1-8.
Donovan D. T., Doguzhaeva L. A. & Mutvei H., 2003 -
Two pairs of fins in thè Late Jurassic Coleoid Trachy¬
teuthis from southern Germany. Berliner Palàobiol-
ogische Abhandlungen, 3: 91-99.
Doyle P., 1991 - Teuthid Cephalopods from thè upper
Jurassic of Antartica. Palaeontology, 34 (1): 169-
178.
Doyle P., Donovan D. T. & Nixon M., 1994 - Phylogeny
and systematics of thè Coleoida. Paleontological con-
tributions, University of Kansas, 5: 1-15.
Ejel F. & Dubertret L., 1966 - Sur Page précis du gise-
ment de poissons et de crustacés crétacés de Sahel
Alma (Liban). Compte Rendu Sommaire des séances
de la Società Géologique de France, 6: 353.
Engeser Th., 1988 - Vampyromorpha (“Fossile
Teuthiden”). In: Fossilium Catalogus. I: Animalia,
130. Westphal F. (ed.). Kugler Publications, Amster¬
dam.
Engeser Th., 1990 - Phylogeny of thè fossil coleoid
Cephalopoda (Mollusca). Berliner geowissenschaftli-
che Abhandlungen (A), 124: 123-191.
Engeser Th., & Reitner J., 1985 - Teuthiden aus dem
Unterapt (“Tòck”) von Helgoland (Schleswig-Hol-
stein, Norddeutschland). Palàontologische Zeitschrift,
59: 245-260.
Engeser Th. & Reitner J., 1986 - Coleoidenreste aus
der Oberkreide des Libanon im Staatlichen Museum
fur Naturkunde in Stuttgart. Stuttgarter Beitràge zur
Naturkunde. Ser. B, 124: 1-17.
Fraas O., 1878 - Geologisches aus dem Libanon. Jahr¬
buch Verein vaterlàndischer Naturkunde Wurttem-
berg, 34: 257-391.
Fuchs D., 2006 - Fossil erhaltungsfàhige Merkmalskom-
plexe der Coleoidea (Cephalopoda) und ihre phy-
logenetische Bedeutung. Berliner Palàobiologische
Abhandlungen, 8: 1-122.
Fuchs D., Keupp H. & Engeser Th., 2003 - New records
of soft parts of Muensterella scutellaris Muenster,
1 842 (Coleoidea) from thè Late Jurassic Plattenkalks
of Eichstàtt and their significance for octobrachian
relationships. Berliner Palàobiologische Abhandlun¬
gen, 3: 101-111.
Fuchs D., Keupp H., Mitta V. V. & Engeser Th. (submit-
ted) - Ultrastructural analyses on thè conotheca of thè
genus Belemnotheutis (Belemnitida: Coleoidea). In:
Proceedings of thè International Cephalopod Sym¬
posium 2004. Mapes R. H. & Landman N. H. (Eds.).
Springer Verlag, Dortrecht.
Forey P. L., Yi L., Patterson C. & Davies C. E., 2003 -
Fossil fìshes from thè Cenomanian (Upper Creta¬
ceous) of Namoura, Lebanon. Journal of Systematic
Palaeontology >, 1 (4): 227-330.
Garassino A., 1994 - The macruran decapod crustaceans
of thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon. Paleontologia
Lombarda, 3: 1-27.
Garassino A. & Donovan D. T., 2000 - A new family of
coleoids from thè Lower Jurassic of Osteno, Northem
Italy. Paleontology, 43 (6): 1019-1038.
Haas W., 2002 - The evolutionary history of thè eight-
armed Coleoidea. In: Cephalopods - Present & Past.
Summesberger H., Histon K. et al. (eds.). Abhandlun¬
gen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 57: 305-326.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
17
Haas W., 2003 - Trends in thè Evolution of thè Decabra-
chia. Berliner Pa/àobio/ogische Abhandlungen , 3:
113-129.
Hecker E. L. & Hecker R. F., 1955 - Teuthidenreste aus
dem Oberen Jura und der Unteren Kreide des Mit-
tleren Wolga-Gebietes. Vorpommerische Paleontolo¬
gie, 2: 36-44.
Hemleben C., 1977 - Rote Tiden und die oberkretazischen
Plattenkalke im Libanon. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geolo¬
gie und Palàontologie Monatshefte, 1977 (4): 239-255.
Hewitt R. A. & Wignall P. B., 1988 - Structure and phy-
logenetic significance of Trachyteuthis (Coleoidea)
from thè Kimmeridge Clay of England. Proceedings
of thè Yorkshire Geologica! Society, 47 (2): 149-153.
Hiickel U., 1970 - Die Fischschiefer von Haquel und
Hajoula in der Oberkreide des Libanon. Neues Jahr¬
buch fur Geologie und Palàontologie Abhandlungen,
135 (2): 113-149.
Hiickel U., 1974a - Geochemischer Vergleich der Plat¬
tenkalke Solnhofens und des Libanon mit anderen
Plattenkalken. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Palàontologie Abhandlungen, 145 (3): 279-305.
Hiickel U., 1974b - Vergleich des Mineralbestandes der
Plattenkalke Solnhofens und des Libano mit anderen
Plattenkalken. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und
Palàontologie Abhandlungen, 145 (2): 153-182.
Jeletzky J. A., 1966 - Comparative morphology, phylog-
eny and classification of fossil Coleoidea. Paleonto-
logical contributions, University of Kansas Mollusco,
7: 1-16.
Kear A., Briggs D. E. G. & Donovan D. T., 1995 - Decay
and fossilization of non-mineralized tissue in coleoid
cephalopods. Palaeontology, 38: 105-131.
Klug C., Schweigert G., Dietl G. & Fuchs D., 2005 -
Coleoid beaks from thè Nusplingen Lithographic
Limestone (Late Kimmeridgian, SW Germany).
Lethaia, 38: 173-192.
Kolbe H. J., 1888 - Zur Kenntnis der Insektenbohrgànge
in fossilen Hòlzem. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geolo-
gischen Gesellschaft, 40: 131-137.
Kostak M., 2002 - Teuthoidea from thè Bohemian Cre-
taceous Basin (Czech Republik) - A criticai Review.
Abhandlungen der geologischen Bundesanstalt, 57:
359-369.
Kretzoi M., 1942 - Necroteuthis n. gen. (Ceph. Dibr.
Necroteuthidae n. f.) aus dem Oligozàn von Budapest
und das System der Dibranchiata. Fòldtani Kòzlòny,
72: 124-138.
Lartret L., 1877 - Exploration geologique de la Mer Morte
de la Palestine et de l'Idumee. Bertrand, Paris.
Lennier G., 1886 - Notes pour servir à l'étude de la palé-
ontologie normande. Bulletin de la Società de Geolo¬
gie de Normandie, 1 1 : 21-31.
Lukeneder A. & Harzhauser M., 2004 - The Cretaceous
coleoid Dorateuthis syriaca Woodward: morphology,
feeding habits and phylogenetic implications. Anna/en
des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, 106 (A): 1-14.
Martill D. M. & Hudson J. D., 1994 - Fossilien aus dem
Omatenton und Oxford Clay. Goldschneck Ver lag.
Naef A., 1922 - Die fossilen Tintenfische - Eine palàozo-
ologische Monographie. Fischerverlag, Jena.
Noetling F., 1886 - Entwurf einer Gliederung der Krei-
deformation in Syrien und Palastina. Zeitschrift der
deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 38: 824-875.
Novati M., 2002 - Fossil Teuthids (Cephalopoda: Cole¬
oidea) from thè Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of
Lebanon. Berliner Palàobiologische Abhandlungen,
1 (Abstracts of thè 1. International Symposium -
Coleoid Cephalopods through time held in Berlin):
88.
Philip J., Babinot J.-F, Tronchetti G., Fourcade, E., Ricou
L. E., Guiaud R., Bellion Y., Herbin J.-P., Combes P.-
E., Conee J.-J. & Dercourt J., 1993 - Late Cenomanian
Palaeoenvironments (94 to 92 Ma). In: Atlas Tethys
Palaeoenvironmental maps. Dercourt J., Ricou L.-E.
& Vrielynck B. (eds.). Gauthier-Villars, Paris: 153-
178.
Quenstedt W., 1932 - iiCurculionites senonicus Kolbe” =
Doratoteuthis syriaca H. Woddward. In: Zufall, Gunst
und Grenzen palàozoologischer Uberlieferung 1932.
Quenstedt W. (ed.). Sitzungsberichte der naturfor-
schenden Freunde Berlin, Berlin: 182-188.
Reitner J. & Engeser Th., 1982 - Teuthiden aus dem Bar-
rémme der Insel Maio (Kapverdische Inseln). Palàon-
tologische Zeitschrift, 56: 209-216.
Riegraf W., 1987 - Plesioteuthis arcuata von der Marck,
1873 (Cephalopoda, Teuthida) from thè Campanian
(late Cretaceous) of Westfalia (NW Germany). Miins-
tersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Palàontologie,
66: 95-110.
Rieppel O. & Head J. J., 2004 - New specimens of thè
fossil snake genus Eupodophis Rage & Escuillié from
Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) of Lebanon. Memorie
della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, XXXII (II): 1-
26.
Rioult M., 1962 - Un calmar fossil du Cenomanien de
Haute-Normandie. Bulletin de la Société de Géologie
de Normandie, 52: 10-13.
Roger J., 1946 - Les invertebres des couches a Poissons
du Cretace superieur du Liban. Memoires de la Société
Géologique de France, 51: 1-92.
Roger J., 1952 - Sous-class des Dibranchiata Owen 1836.
In: Traite de Paleontologie. Piveteau J. (ed.). Masson,
Paris, 2: 689-755.
Schevill W. E., 1950 - An upper Jurassic sepioid from
Cuba. Journal of Paleontology, 24 (1): 99-101.
Schram F. R., Hof C. H. J. & Steeman F. A., 1999 - Thy-
lacocephala (Arthropoda: ?Crustacea) from thè Creta¬
ceous of Lebanon and implications for thylococepha-
lan Systematics. Paleontology, 42 (5): 769-797 .
Schulze H.-P., 1989 - Three-dimensional muscle preser-
vation in Jurassic Fishes of Chile. Revista Geologica
deChile, 16(2): 183-215.
Taverne L. & Filleul A., 2003 - Osteology and relation-
ships of thè genus Spaniodon (Teleostei, Salmoni-
formes) from thè Santonian (Upper Cretaceous) of
Lebanon. Palaeontology, 46 (5): 927-944.
Tong H., Hirayama R., Makhoul E. & Escuillié F., 2006 -
Rhinochelys (Chelonioidea: Protostegidae) from thè
Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Nammoura, Leba¬
non. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e
del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano, 147
(1): 113-138.
Vecchione M., Young R. E. & Carlini D. B., 2000 -
Reconstruction of ancestral character States in neo-
coleoid cephalopods based on parsimony. American
Malacological Bulletin, 15 (2): 179-193.
18
DIRK FUCHS
Waage K. M., 1965 - The late Cretaceous coleoid cepha-
lopod Actinosepia canadensis Whiteaves. Postilla, 94.
Wade M., 1993 - New Kelaenida and Vampyromorpha:
Cretaceous squid from Queensland. Memoirs of thè
Australasian Associatori of Palaeontologists, 15:
353-374.
Wilby P. R., 1993 - The role of organic matrices in post-
mortem phosphatization of soft-tissues. Kaupia, 2:
99-113.
Wilby P. R. & Briggs D. E. G., 1997 - Taxonomic trends
in thè resolution of detail preserved in fossil phos-
phatized soft tissues. Geobios, memoire special, 20:
493-502.
Wippich G. E. & Lehmann J., 2004 - Allocrioceras from
thè Cenomanian (mid-Cretaceous) of thè Lebanon
and its hearing on thè palaeobiological interpretation
of heteromorphic ammonites. Palaeontology, 47 (5):
1093-1109.
Woodward H., 1 883 - On a new genus of fossil “calamary”
from thè Cretaceous formation of Sahel Alma, near
Beirut, Lebanon, Syria. Geologica/ Magazine, N.S.,
10: 1-5.
Woodward H., 1896 - On a Fossil Octopus ( Calais New-
boldi, J. de C. Sby. MS.) from thè Cretaceous of thè
Lebanon. Quaternary Journal of thè Geo logicai Soci¬
ety of London, 52: 229-234.
Young R. E. & Vecchione M., 1996 - Analysis of morphol-
ogy to determine primary sister-taxon relationships
within coleoid cephalopods. American Malacological
Bulletin, 12(1/2): 91-112.
Young R. E., Vecchione M. & Donovan D. T., 1998 - The
Evolution of Cephalopods and their present Biodiver-
sity and Ecology. South Africa Journal of Marin Sci¬
ence, 20: 393-420.
Dirk. 1 uchs - Freie Universitàt Berlin, Institut tur Geologische Wissenschaften, Fachrichtung Palàontologie, Malteserstr. 74-100,
D- 12249 Berlin, Germany.
e-mail: drig@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Morphology, taxonomy and diversity of vampyropod Coleoids (Cephalopoda) from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume XXXI V - Fascicolo II
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
19
mm
PI. I - Dorateuthis syriaca. A) Specimen MSNM i25 1 44 from Hjoùla. Seen in ventral view. is = ink sac; Ir = lateral ridge; se = stomach
contents. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Same specimen as in Fig. A. Close up of thè posterior region. Punctuated line marks supposed lateral
fields (10; Ir = lateral ridge. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Specimen MSNM i23 1 08 from Sàhel Aalma. Seen in ventral view. Ir = lateral ridge;
mf = median field; mm = mantle muscolature; mr = median ridge. Scale bar: 1 cm.
20
DIRK FUCHS
PI. II - Dorateuthis syriaca. A) Specimen MSNM Ì24800 from Hjoùla. Seen in lateral view. bm = buccal mass; co = conus. Arrow
heads mark and delimit thè outline of thè ventral mantle. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Specimen MSNM i25 1 33 from Hjoùla. Seen in lateral
view. ac = arm crown; bm = buccal mass; is = ink sac. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) A specimen from Sàhel Aalma deposited in thè Naturhis-
torisches Museum Wien, NHMW 1998z0 105/0000 (originai of Lukeneder & Harzhauser 2004). Seen in ventral view. The arm crown
consists ot eight arms. Note, that thickness of arms, body as well as gladius outline is a preparational artefact. Scale bar: 1 cm.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
21
( <4v^y/
' ■ ^ Ì8L
PI. Ili - Dorateuthis syriaca. A) Specimen MSNM i25 1 34 from Hjoùla. Seen in lateral view. b = beaks; bm = buccal mass; f = fin; is = ink sac.
Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Holotype of Dorateuthis syriaca from Sàhel Aalma (British Museum of Naturai History London, BMNH C501 7). On thè
left a weak arm crown is visible. On thè right weak imprints of thè gladius with lateral and median ridges. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Holotype of
Dorateuthis sahilalmae from Sàhel Aalma (Staatliches Museum fìir Naturkunde Stuttgart, SMNS 26269). Seen in dorsal view. Lateral ridges
(Ir) diverge at a remarkable apikal angle. Most probably this due to a longitudinal disrupted gladius. is = ink sac. Scale bar: 1 cm.
22
DIRK. FUCHS
PI. IV - Rachiteuthis donovani ( nov ; spec.). A) Holotype (MSNM i25 1 42) from Hjoùla. Seen in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Sartie
specimen as in Fig. A. Close up ot thè anterior part of thè gladius. Where parts of thè gladius have not been preserved, imprints of thè
ventral side are visible. id = ink duct; ntk = ntedian keel; mm = muscular mantle. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Same specimen as in Fig. A. Close
up ot thè posterior part ot thè gladius. hz = hyperbolar zone; lf = lateral field; Ir = lateral ridge; mk = median keel. Scale bar: 1 cm.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
23
’&sa
bm
ac
r .. JjK *
tf, ' r.
v4jM-
_
PI. V - Rachiteuthis donovani ( nov : spec.). A) Paratype I (MSNM Ì25135) from Hjoula. The gladius is seen in dorsal view, whereas thè
body is in lateral aspect. ac = arm crown; bm = buccal mass; f = fin; fu = funnel; is = ink sac. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Paratype li (MSNM
Ì25139) from Hjoula. Gladius in dorsal view. Body in lateral view. is = ink sac. Scale bar: 1 cm. Left bottoni corner: a dose up of thè
head region. It seems as if thè dorsal mantle is fused with thè head region.
24
DIRK FUCHS
M- \ 1 ■ Rachìteuthis donovani ( nov : spec.) photographed with ultra violet light. A) Holotype. Phosphatised remains are shining white.
ruma posterior mantle margin. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Paratype I. Although tissues are poorly posphatised, number of arms (1-8), body
as well as fin outlines are distinctive. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Paratype II. At least four arm stubs are visible. Scale bar: 1 cm.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
25
PI. VII - Trachyteuthis cf. hastiformis. A) Specimen MSNM Ì20591 from Hàqel. Seen in ventral view. Gladius outline is clearly visible.
Soft parts are not preserved. Scale bar: 1 cm. Fig. B) Same specimen as in Fig. A. Close up of thè anterior part. ga = granulated area.
Scale bar: 1 cm. Fig. C) Same specimen as in Fig. A. Close up of thè posterior part. ga = granulated area; hz = hyperbolar zone; ia =
inner asymptote; lf = lateral field; mf = median field; oa = outer asymptote. Scale bar: 1 cm.
26
DIRK FUCHS
PI. VII! - Glyphiteuthis. A) Glyphiteuthis ( Libcinoteuthis ) libanotica from Hàqel. Specimen MSNM i25 127. Seen in dorsal view. Scale
bar: 1 cm. B) Holotype of Glyphiteuthis ( Libanoteuthis ) libanotica (Staatliches Museum fìir Naturkunde Stuttgart, SMNS 26269)
from Hàqel. Seen in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Holotype of Glyphiteuthis ornata (National Museum Prague, 06099) from thè
Turonian of Bohemia (CZ). Seen in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 cm.
MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY AND DIVERSITY OF VAMPYROPOD COLEOIDS (CEPHALOPODA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
27
PI. IX - Glyphiteuthis libanotica. A) Specimen MSNM i25 1 38 from Hàqel. ga = granulateci area; hz = hyperbolar zone; is = ink sac; ia
= inner asymptote; lf = lateral field; mf = median field; oa = outer asymptote. Seen in dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 cm. B) Specimen MSNM
Ì24801 from Hàqel. Seen in lateral view. ab = armbases; bm = buccal mass; mm = mantle muscolature. Scale bar: 1 cm. C) Same speci¬
men as in Fig. B photographed with ultra violet light. ab = armbases; bm = buccal mass; mm = mantle musculature. Scale bar: 1 cm.
28
DIRK FUCHS
INDEX
Introduction . Pag. 3
Previous studies on coleoid cephalopods from
thè Late Cretaceous of Lebanon . Pag. 4
Geological setting . Pag. 4
Material . Pag. 5
Modes of preservation . Pag. 5
Systematic palaeontology . Pag. 6
Phylogenetic implications . Pag. 14
Conclusions . Pag. 15
Acknowledgments . Pag. 15
References . Pag. 16
l
Ili - PELOSIO G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Al¬
pe Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Hildoceras, Phymatoceras, Paronice-
ras e Frechiella. Conclusioni generali./?/?. 143-204, 2 figg., 6 tavv.
Volume XVIII
I - PINNA G., 1969 - Revisione delle ammoniti figurate da Giuseppe Me¬
neghini nelle Tavv. 1-22 della «Monographie des fossiles du calcaire
rouge ammonitique » ( 1 867- 1881)./?/?. 5-22, 2 figg. , 6 tavv.
II - MONTANARI L., 1969 - Aspetti geologici del Lias di Gozzano (Lago
d’Orta )./?/?. 23-92, 42 figg., 4 tavv. n.t.
Ili - PETRUCCI F., BORTOLAMI G. C. & DAL P1AZ G. V., 1970 - Ri¬
cerche sull’anfiteatro morenico di Rivoli-Avigliana (Prov. Torino) e sul
suo substrato cristallino. /?/?. 93-169, con carta a colori al 1:40.000, 14
figg., 4 tavv. a colori e 2 b.n.
Volume XIX
I - CANTALUPPI G., 1 970 - Le Hildoceratidae del Lias medio delle regio¬
ni mediterranee - Loro successione e modificazioni nel tempo. Riflessi
biostratigrafici e sistematici./?/?. 5-46, 2 tabb. n.t.
II - PINNA G. & LEVI-SETT1 F„ 1971 - 1 Dactylioceratidae della Provin¬
cia Mediterranea (Cephalopoda Ammonoidea). pp. 47-136, 21 figg.,
12 tavv.
Ili - PELOSIO G., 1973 - Le ammoniti del Trias medio di Asklepieion (Ar-
golide, Grecia) - 1. Fauna del «calcare a Ptychites » (Anisico sup.). pp.
137-168, 3 figg., 9 taw.
Volume XX
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI 0., 1971 - La cultura di Remedello.
Problematica ed ergologia di una facies dell’Eneolitico Padano, pp.
5-80, 2 figg., 20 tavv.
II - PETRUCCI F., 1972 - Il bacino del Torrente Cinghio (Prov. Parma).
Studio sulla stabilità dei versanti e conservazione del suolo./?/?. 81-127,
37 figg., 6 carte tematiche.
Ili - CERETTI E. & POLUZZI A., 1973 - Briozoi della biocalcarenite del
Fosso di S. Spirito (Chieti, Abruzzi), pp. 129-169, 18 figg., 2 tavv.
Volume XXI
I- PINNA G., 1974 - 1 crostacei della fauna triassica di Cene in Val Seriana
(Bergamo)./?/?. 5-34, 16 figg., 16 tavv.
II - POLUZZI A., 1975 - 1 Briozoi Cheilostomi del Pliocene della Val d’Ar-
da (Piacenza, Italia)./?/?. 35-78, 6 figg., 5 tavv.
Ili - BRAMBILLA G., 1976 - I Molluschi pliocenici di Villalvernia (Ales¬
sandria). I. Lamellibranchi. pp. 79-128, 4 figg., 10 taw.
Volume XXII
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI O. & CALEGARI G„ 1978 - Corpus
delle pintaderas preistoriche italiane. Problematica, schede, iconogra¬
fia./?/?. 5-30, 6 figg., 13 tavv.
II - PINNA G., 1979 - Osteologia dello scheletro di Kritosaurus notabilis
(Lambe, 1914) del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (Ornithi-
schia Hadrosauridae). pp. 31-56, 3 figg., 9 tavv.
Ili - BIANCOTTI A., 1981 - Geomorfologia dell’Alta Langa (Piemonte
meridionale)./?/?. 57-104, 28 figg., 12 tabb., 1 carta f.t.
Volume XXIII
I - GIACOBINI G., CALEGARI G. & PINNA G., 1 982 - 1 resti umani fos¬
sili della zona di Arena Po (Pavia). Descrizione e problematica di una
serie di reperti di probabile età paleolitica./?/?. 5-44, 4 figg., 16 tavv.
II - POLUZZI A., 1982 - 1 Radiolari quaternari di un ambiente idrotermale
del Mar Tirreno, pp. 45-72, 3 figg., 1 tab., 13 taw.
Ili - ROSSI F., 1984 - Ammoniti del Kimmeridgiano superiore-Berriasiano
inferiore del Passo del Furio (Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano), pp. 73-
138, 9 figg., 2 tabb., 8 taw.
Volume XXIV
I - PINNA G., 1 984 - Osteologia di Drepanosaurus unguicaudatus, lepido-
sauro triassico del sottordine Lacertilia. pp. 5-28, 12 figg., 2 taw.
II - NOSOTTI S. e PINNA G., 1989 - Storia delle ricerche e degli studi
sui rettili Placodonti. Parte prima 1830-1902. pp. 29-86, 24 figg., 12
taw.
Volume XXV
I - CALEGARI G., 1989 - Le incisioni rupestri di Taouardei (Gao, Mali).
Problematica generale e repertorio iconografico, pp. 1-14, 9 figg., 24
taw.
li - PINNA G. & NOSOTTI S., 1989 - Anatomia, morfologia funzionale
e paleoecologia del rettile placodonte Psephoderma alpinum Meyer,
1858 .pp. 15-50, 20 figg., 9 taw.
Ili - CALDARA R., 1990 - Revisione Tassonomica delle specie paleartiche
del genere Tychius Germar (Coleoptera Curculionidae). pp. 51-218,
575 figg.
Volume XXVI
I - PINNA G., 1992 - Cyamodus hildegardis Peyer, 1931 (Reptilia, Placo-
dontia )./?/?. 1-21, 23 figg.
II - CALEGARI G. a cura di, 1993 - L’arte e l’ambiente del Sahara preisto¬
rico: dati e interpretazioni./?/?. 25-556, 647 figg.
Ili - ANDRI E. e ROSSI F., 1993 - Genesi ed evoluzione di frangenti,
cinture, barriere ed atolli. Dalle stromatoliti alle comunità di scogliera
moderne, pp. 559-610, 49 figg., 1 tav.
Volume XXVII
I - PINNA G. and GH1SELIN M. edited by, 1996 - Biology as History. N.
1 . Systematic Biology as an Historical Science, pp. 1-133, 68 figs.
II - LEONARDI C. e SASSI D. a cura di, 1997 - Studi geobotanici ed en-
tomofaunistici nel Parco Regionale del Monte Barro, pp. 135-266, 122
figg., 23 tabb.
Volume XXVIII
I - BANFI E. & GALASSO G„ 1998 - La flora spontanea della città di
Milano alle soglie del terzo millennio e i suoi cambiamenti a partire dal
1700 .pp. 267-388, 71 figg., 30 tabb.
Volume XXIX
I - CALEGARI G., 1999 - L’arte rupestre dell’Eritrea. Repertorio ragionato
ed esegesi iconografica./?/?. 1-174, 268 figg.
Volume XXX
I - PEZZOTTA F. edited by, 2000 - Mineralogy and petrology of shallow
depth pegmatites. Paper from thè First International Workshop, pp. 1-
117, 30 figs., 19 tabs.
II - PARISI B., FRANCHINO A. & BERTI A. con la collaborazione di
POTENZA B. & RUBINI D., 2000 - La Società Italiana di Scienze
Naturali 1855 -2000. Percorsi storici./?/?. 1-163, 199 figg.
Ili - DE ANGELI A. & GARASSINO A., 2002 - Galatheid, chirostylid and
porcellanid decapods (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) from thè Eoce¬
ne and Oligocene of Vicenza (N Italy )./?/?. 1-31, 21 figs., 9 pls.
Volume XXXI
I - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2002 - The braincase of Placodus Agassiz,
1833 (Reptilia, Placodontia). pp. 1-18, 15 figs.
II - MARTORELLI G., 2002 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. (1895). Riedizione a cura di Fausto Barbagli./?/?. [XX] 1-216,
[14] 46 figg., 4 tavv.
Ili - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2003 - Eusanrosphargis dalsassoi n. gen.
n. sp., a new, unusual diapsid reptile from thè Middle Triassic of Besano
(Lombardy, N Italy)./?/?. 1-33, 19 figs., 1 tab., 3 pls.
Volume XXXII
I - ALESSANDRELLO A., BRACCHI G. & RIOU B., 2004 - Polychaete,
sipunculan and enteropneust worms from thè Lower Callovian (Middle
Jurassic) of La Voulte-sur-Rhòne (Ardèche, France). pp. 1-16, 9 figs.,
1 pi.
II - RIEPPEL O. & HEAD J. J., 2004 - New specimens of thè fossil snake
genus Eupodophis Rage & Escuillié, from Cenomanian (Late Creta-
ceous) of Lebanon. pp. 1-26, 13 figs., 1 tab.
Ili - BRACCHI G. & ALESSANDRELLO A., 2005 - Paleodiversity of thè
free-living polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) and description of new
taxa from thè Upper Cretaceous Lagerstàtten of Haqel, Hadjula and
Al-Namoura (Lebanon)./?/?. 1-48, 8 figs., 1 tab., 16 pls.
Volume XXXIII
I - BOESI A. & CARDI F. edited by, 2005 - Wildlife and plants in tradi-
tional and modem Tibet: conception, exploration and conservation. pp.
1-88, 30 figs., 9 tabs.
II - BANFI E., BRACCHI G„ GALASSO . & ROMANI E., 2005 - Agro-
stologia Piacentina, pp. 1-80, 7 figs., 1 tabs.
Ili - LIVI P. a cura di 2005 - I fondi speciali della Biblioteca del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. La raccolta di stampe antiche del
Centro Studi Archeologia Africana, pp. 1-250, 389 figs.
Volume XXXIV
I - GARASSINO A. & SCHWEIGERT G., 2006 - The Upper Jurassic
Solnhofen decapod crustacean fauna: review of thè types from old
descriptions. Pari I. Infraorders Astacidea, Thalassinidea and Palinura.
pp. 1-64, 12 figs., 20 pls.
I
I
Le Memorie sono disponibili presso la Segreteria della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali,
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55 -20121 Milano
Pubblicazione disponibile al cambio
della Società Italiana
di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo III di Storia Naturale di Milano
— - - — ■ —
A NEW SPECIES OF
PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA)
FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
OF PYTHONOMORPHA
MILANO LUGLIO 2006
Elenco delle Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume I
I - CORNALIA E., 1865 - Descrizione di una nuova specie dei genere
Felis: Fehs jacobita (Com.). 9 pp., 1 tav.
II - MAGNI-GRIFFI F., 1865 - Di una specie A'Hippolais nuova per l’Ita¬
lia. 6 pp., 1 tav.
Ili - GASTALDI B., 1865 - Sulla riescavazione dei bacini lacustri per opera
degli antichi ghiacciai. 30 pp., 2 figg-, 2 taw.
IV - SEGUENZA G., 1 865 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina. 88 pp., 8 taw.
V - GIBELLI G., 1865 - Sugli organi riproduttori del genere Verrucaria,
16 pp., 1 tav.
VI - BEGGIATO F. S., 1865 - Antracoterio di Zovencedo e di Monteviale
nel Vicentino, 10 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1865 - Di alcuni resti umani e degli oggetti di umana
industria dei tempi preistorici raccolti in Toscana. 32 pp., 4 taw.
Vili - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1866 - Come sia fatto l’organo che fa
lume nella lucciola volante dell’Italia centrale (Luciola italica) e come
le fibre muscolari in questo ed altri Insetti ed Artropodi. 28 pp., 2 taw.
IX - MAGGI L., 1865 - Intorno al genere Aeolosoma. 18 pp., 2 taw.
X - CORNALLAE., 1865 - Sopra i caratteri microscopici offerti dalle Cantari¬
di e da altri Coleotteri facili a confondersi con esse. 40 pp., 4 taw.
Volume II
I - ISSEL A., 1 866 - Dei Molluschi raccolti nella provincia di Pisa, 38 pp.
II - GENTILLI A., 1866 - Quelques considérations sur l’origine des bassins
lacustres, àpropos des sondages du Lac de Come. 12 pp., 8 taw.
Ili - MOLON F., 1867 - Sulla flora terziaria delle Prealpi venete. 140 pp.
IV - D’ACHIARDI A., 1866 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummulitico
delle Alpi venete. 54 pp., 5 taw.
V - COCCHI I., 1866 - Sulla geologia dell’alta Valle di Magra. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VI - SEGUENZA G., 1866 - Sulle importanti relazioni paleontologiche di
talune rocce cretacee della Calabria con alcuni terreni di Sicilia e del¬
l’Africa settentrionale. 18 pp., 1 tav.
VII - COCCHI I., 1866 - L’uomo fossile nell’Italia centrale. 82 pp., 21 figg.,
4 taw.
Vili - GAROVAGLIO S., 1866 - Manzonia cantiana, novum Lichenum
Angiocarporum genus propositum atque descriptum. 8 pp., 1 tav.
IX - SEGUENZA G., 1867 - Paleontologia malacologica dei terreni terziarii
del distretto di Messina (Pteropodi ed Eteropodi). 22 pp., 1 tav.
X - DURER B., 1867 - Osservazioni meteorologiche fatte alla Villa Carlot¬
ta sul lago di Como, ecc. 48 pp. 11 taw.
Volume III
I - EMERY C., 1873 - Studii anatomici sulla Vipera Rechi. 16 pp., 1 tav.
II - GAROVAGLIO S., 1867 - Thelopsis, Beloraa, Weitenwebera et Limbo-
ria, quatuor Lichenum Angiocarporum genera recognita iconibusque
illustrata. 12 pp., 2 taw.
Ili - TARGIONI-TOZZETTI A., 1867 - Studii sulle Cocciniglie. 88 pp., 7 taw.
IV - CLAPARÈDE E. R. e PANCERI P., 1867 - Nota sopra un Alciopide
parassito della Cydippe densa Forsk. 8 pp. 1 taw.
V - GAROVAGLIO S., 1871 - De Pertusariis Europae mediae commenta-
tio. 40 pp., 4 taw.
Volume IV
I - D’ACHIARDI A., 1868 - Corallarj fossili del terreno nummulitico del-
l’ Alpi venete. Parte 11. 32 pp. 8 taw.
II - GAROVAGLIO S., 1868 - Octona Lichenum genera vel adhuc con¬
troversa, vel sedis prorsus incertae in systemate, novis descnptionibus
iconibusque accuratissimis illustrata. 18 pp., 2 taw.
III - MARINONI C., 1868 - Le abitazioni lacustri e gli avanzi di umana
industria in Lombardia. 66 pp., 5 figg., 7 taw.
IV - (Non pubblicato).
V - MARINONI C., 1871 - Nuovi avanzi preistorici in Lombardia. 28 pp.,
3 figg., 2 taw.
NUOVA SERIE
Volume V
I - MARTORELLI G., 1895 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. 216 pp., 46 figg., 4 taw.
Volume VI
I - DE ALESSANDRI G., 1897 - La pietra da cantoni di Rosignano e di
Vignale. Studi stratigrafici e paleontologici. 104 pp., 2 taw., 1 carta.
II - MARTORELLI G., 1898 - Le forme e le simmetrie delle macchie nel
piumaggio. Memoria ornitologica. 112 pp., 63 figg., 1 taw.
Ili - PAVESI R, 1901- L'abbate Spallanzani a Pavia. 68 pp., 14 figg., 1 tav.
Volume VII
1 - DE ALESSANDRI G., 1910 - Studi sui pesci triasici della Lombardia.
164 pp., 9 taw.
Volume Vili
1 - REPOSSI E., 1915 - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrografici e
geologici. Parte I. pp. 1-46, 5 figg., 3 taw.
II - REPOSSI E., 1916 (1917) - La bassa Valle della Mera. Studi petrogra¬
fici e geologici. Parte II. pp. 47-186, 5 figg. 9 taw.
III - AIRAGIII C., 1917 - Sui molari d'elefante delle alluvioni lombarde,
con osservazioni sulla filogenia e scomparsa di alcuni Proboscidati. pp.
187-242, 4 figg., 3 taw.
Volume IX
I - BEZZI M., 1918 - Studi sulla ditterofauna nivale delle Alpi italiane, pp.
1-164, 7 figg. 2 taw.
II - SERAG. L., 1920 - Sui rapporti della conformazione della base del cra¬
nio colle forme craniensi e colle strutture della faccia nelle razze uma¬
ne. (Saggio di una nuova dottrina craniologica con particolare riguardo
dei prmcipali cranii fossili), pp. 165-262, 7 figg., 2 taw.
Ili - DE BEAUX O. e FESTA E., 1927 - La ricomparsa del Cinghiale nel-
l’Italia settentrionale-occidentale, pp. 263-320, 13 figg., 7 taw.
Volume X
I - DESIO A., 1929 - Studi geologici sulla regione dell’Albenza (Prealpi
Bergamasche), pp. 1-156, 27 figg., 1 tav., 1 carta.
II - SCORTECCI G., 1937 - Gli organi di senso della pelle degli Agamidi.
pp. 157-208, 39 figg. 2 taw.
III - SCORTECCI G., 1941- 1 recettori degli Agamidi. pp. 209-326, 80 figg.
Volume XI
I - GUIGLIA D., 1944 - Gli Sfecidi italiani del Museo di Milano (Hymen.).
pp. 1-44, 4 figg., 5 taw.
II-III - GIACOBINI V. e PIGNATTI S„ 1955 - Flora e Vegetazione dell’Al¬
ta Valle del Braulio. Con speciale riferimento ai pascoli di altitudine.
pp. 45-238, 31 figg., 1 carta.
Volume XII
I - VIALLI V., 1956 - Sul rinoceronte e l’elefante dei livelli superiori della
serie lacustre di Leffe (Bergamo), pp. 1-70, 4 figg. 6 taw.
I - VENZO S., 1957 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte I: Tratto occidentale Gardone-Desenzano. pp. 71-140, 14
figg - 6 taw., 1 carta.
III - VIALLI V., 1959 - Ammoniti sinemuriane del Monte Albenza (Berga¬
mo). pp. 141-188, 2 figg., 5 taw.
Volume XIII
I - VENZO S., 1961- Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico del
Garda. Parte II. Tratto orientale Garda-Adige e anfiteatro atesino di
Rivoli veronese, pp. 1-64, 25 figg., 9 taw., 1 carta.
II - PINNA G., 1963 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Mercaticeras, Pseudomercaticeras e Bro¬
di eia. pp. 65-98, 2 figg., 4 taw.
Ili - ZANZUCCHI G., 1963 - Le Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano)
di Entratico in Val Cavallina (Bergamasco orientale), pp. 99-146, 2
figg-- & tavv-
Volume XIV
I - VENZO S., 1965 - Rilevamento geologico dell’anfiteatro morenico
frontale del Garda dal Chiese all’Adige, pp. 1-82, 11 figg., 4 taw., 1
carta.
II - PINNA G., 1966 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglia Dactylioceratidae. pp. 83-136, 4 taw.
Ili - DIENI I., MASSARI F. e MONTANARI L„ 1966 - Il Paleogene dei
dmtomi di Orosei (Sardegna), pp. 13-184, 5 figg., 8 taw.
Volume XV
I - C ARETTO P. G., 1966 - Nuova classificazione di alcuni Briozoi plioce¬
nici, precedentemente determinati quali Idrozoi del genere Hydractinia
Van Beneden. pp. 1-88, 27 figg. 9 taw.
II - DIENI I. e MASSARI F., 1966 - Il Neogene e il Quaternario dei dintorni
di Orosei (Sardegna), pp. 89-142, 8 figg., 7 taw.
Ili - BARBIERI F„ IACCARINO S„ BARBIERI F. & PETRUCCI F., 1967
- Il Pliocene del Subappennino Piacentino-Parmense-Reggiano. pp.
143-188, 20 figg., 3 taw.
Volume XVI
I - C ARETTO P. G., 1967 - Studio morfologico con l’ausilio del metodo
statistico e nuova classificazione dei Gasteropodi pliocenici attribuibili
■d\Murex brandaris Linneo . pp. 1-60, 1 fig., 7 tabb., 10 taw.
II - SACCHI VIALLI G. e CANTALUPPI G., 1967-1 nuovi fossili di Goz¬
zano (Prealpi piemontesi)./?/?. 61-128, 30 figg., 8 taw.
Ili - PIGORINI B., 1967 - Aspetti sedimentologici del Mare Adriatico, pp.
129-200, 13 figg., 4 tabb. 7 taw.
Volume XVII
I - PINNA G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Alpe
Turati (Erba, Como). Famiglie Lytoceratidae, Nannolytoceratidae,
Hammatoceratidae (excl. Phymatoceratinae) Hildoceratidae (excl.
Hildoceratinae e Bouleiceratinae). pp. 1-70, 2 taw. n.t., 6 figg., 6 taw.
II - VENZO S. & PELOSIO G., 1968 - Nuova fauna a Ammonoidi del-
l’Anisico superiore di Lenna in Val Brembana (Bergamo), pp. 71-142,
5 figg., 11 taw.
Michael W. Caldwell
new species of Pontosaurus (Squamata, Pythonomorpha)
from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
and a phylogenetic analysis of Pythonomorpha
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo III
Luglio 2006
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
INDEX
Introduction . Pag- ^
Pontosaurs, dolichosaurs and basai pythonomorphs:
an overview . Pag. 4
Systematic Palaeontology . Pag. 5
Osteological description . Pag.
State of preservation . Pag-
Skull . Pag-
Postcranial skeleton . Pag. 17
Axial skeleton . Pag. 1 7
Pectoral girdle and forelimb . Pag. 20
Pelvic girdle and rearlimb . Pag. 24
Squamation and tracheal rings . Pag. 28
Squamation . Pag- 28
Tracheal and ?bronchial? rings . Pag. 32
Phylogenetic analysis . Pag. 32
Methodology . Pag- 32
Results . Pag- 32
Character distributions . Pag. 34
Discussion . Pag. 35
Functional morphology . Pag. 35
Pontosaurus . Pag. 36
Acknowledgements . Pag. 37
References . Pag. 38
Appendix I . Pag. 40
Appendix II . Pag. 42
© 2006 Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale
Corso Venezia, 55 - 20121 Milano
In copertina: Pontosaurus kornhuberi. Watercolour by Fabio Fogliazza.
Registrato al tribunale di Milano al n. 6694
Direttore responsabile: Anna Alessandrello
Responsabile di redazione: Stefania Nosotti
Grafica editoriale: P.R.G.
Stampa: Litografia Solari, Peschiera Borromeo - Luglio 2006
ISSN 0376-2726
Michael W. Caldwell
A new species of Pontosaurus (Squamata, Pythonomorpha)
from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
and a phylogenetic analysis of Pythonomorpha
Abstract - A new fossil marine squamate from thè Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) of Lebanon is described and its phylogenetic relationships
analyzed. The taxon represents a new species of Pontosaurus , previously known from only thè type species and only one specimen, designated
Pontosaurus lesinensis (Kornhuber, 1873). The new taxon is very well preserved including thè squamation and a complete tail numbering 163 caudal
vertebrae. New and important features of thè braincase of pontosaurs are highlighted: 1) thè supraoccipital position and its overlap of thè parietal; 2)
thè alar process of prootics elongate contact with parietal; 3) thè reduction of thè paroccipital process. A phylogenetic analysis of pythonomorphs, uti-
lizing these new characters in a data matrix of 77 characters and 10 terminal taxa, finds nine shortest trees with a tree length of 1 19 steps (C.I. = 0.773;
HI = 0.226). The nine shortest trees vary only in thè sistergroup relationships of Aphanizocnemus libanensis within non-mosasauroid pythonomorphs,
and thè ingroup relationships of ophidian pythonomorphs. For example, cladogram one presents thè following sistergroup structure: ((Aigialosauridae,
Mosasauridae) (Dolichosauridae ( Aphanizocnemus libanensis (( Pontosaurus lesinensis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi) ( Adriosaurus suessi (Pachyophis
woodwardi (Pachyrhachis problematicus, Serpentes))))))). In thè context of thè hypothesized phylogeny presented in this study, thè functional mor-
phology of pontosaurs is discusseci, highlighting tail and limb function in relationship to locomotory capability.
Key words - Squamates, pythonomorphs, marine lizards, Cretaceous, Lebanon, phylogeny.
Riassunto - Una nuova specie di Pontosaurus (Squamata, Pythonomorpha) dal Cretacico superiore del Libano e una analisi filogenetica dei
Pythonomorpha.
Viene descritto un nuovo squamato fossile marino e ne vengono analizzate le relazioni filogenetiche. Il taxon rappresenta una nuova specie di
Pontosaurus, genere di cui era precedentemente nota solamente la specie tipo, con un singolo esemplare, denominata Pontosaurus lesinensis
(Kornhuber, 1873). Il nuovo esemplare qui descritto è molto ben conservato: la coda di 163 vertebre è completa e sono presenti resti delle squame.
Vengono messe in luce nuove e importanti caratteristiche della scatola cranica: 1) la posizione del sopraoccipitale e la sua sovrapposizione al parieta¬
le; 2) l’esteso contatto del processo alare dei prootici con il parietale; 3) la riduzione del processo paraoccipitale. Una analisi filogenetica dei pitono-
morfi che utilizza questi nuovi caratteri in una matrice di 77 caratteri e 10 taxa terminali produce nove alberi con una lunghezza di 1 19 steps (CI =
0.773; HI = 0.226). Questi nove alberi variano unicamente nelle relazioni filogenetiche di Aphanizocnemus libanensis entro i pitonomorfi non-mosa-
sauroidi, e nelle relazioni filogenetiche interne dei pitonomorfi ofidi. Ad esempio il primo cladogramma presenta la seguente articolazione dei succes¬
sivi sistergroups: ((Aigialosauridae, Mosasauridae) (Dolichosauridae ( Aphanizocnemus libanensis ((Pontosaurus lesinensis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi )
(Adriosaurus suessi (Pachyophis woodwardi (Pachyrhachis problematicus, Serpentes)))))))). La morfologia funzionale dei pontosauri viene discussa
nel contesto della filogenesi ipotizzata, evidenziando Timportante funzione locomotoria della coda e degli arti.
Parole chiave - Squamati, pitonomorfi, rettili marini, Cretacico, Libano, filogenesi.
INTRODUCTION
Over thè course of their known history, encompassing
more than 130 million years, squamate reptiles evolved a
wide and surprising array of anatomies as thè various
clades radiated and adapted into both terrestrial and
aquatic environments. For example, limb reduction to
complete limblessness, usually associated with extreme
increases in body length, is observed in almost all lineag-
es of living squamates (Greer, 1991; Caldwell, 2003) and
certainly characterizes thè nearly 3,000 species of snakes,
which are arboreal, terrestrial, fossorial, cryptic, and
aquatic. Modern squamates also show an amazing range
in size from thè incredibly large komodo dragons to thè
smallest known living amniotes Sphaerodactylus ariasae,
a Caribbean gecko, which is only 16 millimeters long
(Hedges & Thomas, 2001).
The list of modern squamate adaptations and anatom-
ical innovations allowing them to colonize varied envi¬
ronments is extensive with but two exceptions - thè air
and thè sea. Among more than 7,000 species of living
squamates, none have evolved powered flight though
some do glide, and only 59 species have evolved and
adapted to life in aquatic marine environments: one
species of iguana, 50 species of true sea snakes, 5 species
of sea kraits, and 3 species of file snakes.
Interestingly, while these living squamates show
remarkable adaptations to life in marine environments, thè
true acme of squamate evolution in marine environments
is not found among modern species, but rather among fos¬
sil squamates. It is thè extinct pythonomorphs, i.e., thè
dolichosaurs, pontosaurs, aigialosaurs, mosasaurs, and
4
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
early snakes, which truly became “aquatic” in every sense
nearly 100 million years ago. This aspect of squamate evo-
lution and evolutionary history is very poorly detailed in
thè literature purporting to evaluate aspects of squamate
evolution. For example, thè recent and excellent treatise on
lizard diversity and evolution by Pianka & Vitt (2003: 260)
only uses thè word “mosasaur” once in more than three
hundred pages, and never even mentions thè existence of
aigialosaurs, dolichosaurs, pontosaurs, adriosaurs or coni-
asaurs. As a result, there is also no discussion of thè extent
of pythonomorph evolution and adaptation to marine envi-
ronments. This knowledge vacuum can only be rectified
by thè presentation of synthetic works, fusing phylogeny,
function, and anatomy, that detail these missing pieces of
squamate evolutionary history.
This study presents a description and phylogenetic
analysis of a new species of ancient marine squamate,
assigned to thè genus Pontosaurus, that was found in 95
million year old rocks (Upper Cretaceous) in Lebanon.
This new specimen is remarkably complete, including thè
preservation of soft tissues, and thus permits a unusual
degree of “biological” interpretation (PI. 1). The genus
Pontosaurus was previously based on only one specimen,
GBA 1873/4/2 (GBA, Austrian Geological Survey, Wien,
Austria), thè type species, Pontosaurus lesinensis
(Kornhuber, 1873). Pontosaurus lesinensis was found in
rocks outcropping on thè island of Hvar, Croatia (Pierce
& Caldwell, 2004) that are considered to be chrono-
equivalents of those in Lebanon that produced thè new
species described here.
The new specimen was collected from a quarry in thè
Valley of Al Gabour near Al Nammoura, 10 km southeast
of Hadjula, Lebanon (Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997; Dal
Sasso & Renesto, 1999). Previous to this work. Dal Sasso
& Pinna (1997) had described thè first known lizard from
thè marine sediments of Lebanon, Aphanizocnemus liba-
nensis, which is considered to be Middle Cenomanian in
age and was collected at a third quarry near Hakel,
Lebanon. The specimen described here is therefore thè
second known lizard from thè platy limestones of
Lebanon and is a very different animai compared to A.
libanensis.
Recent work by Caldwell & Dal Sasso (2004)
described thè remarkably well-preserved squamation of
thè new lizard, a feature not usually preserved in verte¬
brate fossils and certainly not for squamates. In this study
thè squamation will be reviewed as part of thè overall
description of thè specimen, but thè focus will be on thè
osteology. Characters obtained from this study will be
added to a modified version of thè character matrix of
Pierce & Caldwell (2004) for thè purpose of constructing
a phylogenetic hypothesis of all pythonomorphs.
PONTOSAURS, DOLICHOSAURS AND BASAL PYTHONOMORPHS: AN OVERVIEW
In 1873, Kornhuber described a new genus and species
of Cretaceous lizard from two separate specimens pre¬
served on platy limestone slabs that had come from quar-
ries outcropping on thè island of Hvar, Croatia, known in
Italian as Isola di Lesina. Kornhuber’s piate “A” preserved
thè posterior portion of thè skeleton of a small reptile; this
piate made its way to Vienna, Austria, by 1869.
Kornhuber’s second specimen, piate “B”, arrived in Vienna
in 1870 and preserved thè anterior portion, including thè
head, neck and forelimbs, of a second small reptile.
Kornhuber’s comparison of thè two specimens led him to
conclude they were thè same thing, if not thè same individ¬
uai, and he therefore assigned them to thè same species,
Hydrosaurus lesinensis ; thè genus Hydrosaurus (Wagler,
1830) is now recognized as thè junior synonym of thè
extant monitor lizard genus, Varanus (Merrem, 1 820).
In 1892, Gorjanovic-Kramberger renamed Hydrosaurus
lesinensis as Pontosaurus lesinensis (Kramberger, 1892)
based on his assessment that it was not similar enough to
thè extant Varanus ( =Hydrosaurus ) to warrant assignment
to that genus. In thè act of recognizing yet another fossil
Adriatic lizard, including Aigialosaurus dalmatici is
(Kramberger, 1892), Adriosaurus suessi (Seeley, 1881),
and Acteosaurus tomassinii (Meyer, 1860), Kramberger
created thè Family Aigialosauridae to include all thè fossil
forms.
Nopcsa (1903) reevaluated thè systematic position of P
lesinensis in a study that included all of Kramberger’s ( 1 892)
taxa, as well as Dolichosaurus longicollis (Owen, 1850),
Opetiosaurus bucchichi (Kornhuber, 1901), Carsosaurus
marchesetti (Kornhuber, 1893), and Mesoleptos zendrinii
(Comalia, 1851). Nopcsa (1903) identified common features
shared by Pontosaurus , Acteosaurus, Adriosaurus and
Dolichosaurus, and assigned them all to thè family
Dolichosauridae (Gervais, 1852), while Aigialosaurus ,
Opetiosaurus, Carsosaurus, and Mesoleptos were assigned
to thè family Aigialosauridae.
Since Nopcsa (1903), except for brief mentions in com¬
parative studies (Nopcsa, 1908, 1923; Calligaris, 1987/1988;
Rieppel, 1988; Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997; Dal Sasso &
Renesto, 1999), Pontosaurus had never been reexamined in
any detail until thè study of Pierce & Caldwell (2004). The
latter study attempted to assess Nopcsa’s (1903) assignment
of Pontosaurus to thè Dolichosauridae based primarily on
recent analyses of existing specimens of Adriosaurus,
Acteosaurus, Dolichosaurus and Coniasaurus (Caldwell,
1999a, 1999b; Caldwell, 2000; Caldwell & Cooper, 1999;
Lee & Caldwell, 2000; Caldwell & Lee, 2004).
Owen (1850) described two monotypic genera of
marine lizards, Dolichosaurus longicollis and Coniasaurus
crassidens, based on a number of specimens collected
from thè Lower Chalk (Cenomanian; Upper Cretaceous) of
southeast England. Dolichosaurus was diagnosed by a
uniquely high number of cervical and dorsal vertebrae
while unique tooth characters diagnosed Coniasaurus',
Owen did not identify any characters linking these two
taxa. Nopcsa (1908) restudied Owen’s specimens and
added several new specimens to thè list of known coni-
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
5
asaurs and dolichosaurs. Unfortunately for Coniasaurus,
Owen (1850) had misidentified thè tooth-bearing element
of thè type specimen (a maxilla) as a dentary leaving
Nopcsa (1908) to build on this error by first, not finding
thè true type, and second, by identifying a pair of well-pre-
served dentaries as Owen’s type specimen (see Caldwell &
Cooper [1999] for thè venue of thè holotype and a
redescription of thè type material). Caldwell’s (1999a)
description of Coniasaurus gracilodens highlighted sever-
al notable differences with C. crassidens such as tooth
shape, maxillary tooth number, and robustness of thè max¬
illa (thè maxilla of C. crassidens is much more elongate
than that of C. gracilodens ). Interestingly, all species
assigned to Coniasaurus are known only from disarticulat-
ed skulls and isolated vertebral elements. In contrast, thè
type and referred specimens of Dolichosaurus longicollis
are articulated postcranial skeletons with only one very
fragmentary skull and no preserved teeth (Caldwell, 2000).
Without consideration of pontosaurs, adriosaurs, or
acteosaurs, coniasaurs and dolichosaurs have been thought
to be nested within basai mosasauroids (mosasaurs and
aigialosaurs) since Nopcsa, (1908), or recently, since
Caldwell’s (1999b) hypothesis that they are thè sistergroup
to mosasauroids. The difficulty in resolving thè
Coniasaurus - Dolichosaurus problem is that both taxa
are represented by non-comparable data: Dolichosaurus
is known from complete postcrania with little or no skull
material, while both species of Coniasaurus are known
from skulls and only a small number of disarticulated
vertebrae.
Nopcsa’s (1903) suggestion that pontosaurs, adriosaurs,
SYSTEMATIC
Reptilia Linnaeus, 1758
Squamata Oppel, 1811
Pythonomorpha Cope, 1 869
Genus Pontosaurus Kramberger, 1 892
Type Species: Hydrosaurus lesinensis
Komhuber, 1873
Pontosaurus lesinensis (Kornhuber, 1873)
Holotypus: GBA 1873/4/2 (GBA, Austrian Geological
Survey, Wien, Austria): articulated cranial and postcranial
remains of one individuai; postcranium includes 12 artic¬
ulated cervical vertebrae, 28 dorsal vertebrae, shoulder
girdles, forelimbs, fragments of femur, and pelvic girdle.
Locus typicum: Hvar Island (= Isola di Lesina),
43°10’N, 16°30’E, Croatia; upper Cenomanian-upper
Turonian (Upper Cretaceous).
Generic Diagnosis: Long, slender lizard possessing
unique supraoccipital-parietal articulation, with supraoc-
cipital resting on top of and forming w-shaped suture
with parietal; elongation of all postdentary bones; 10-12
cervical vertebrae; hypapophyses with large, unfused
peduncles on C2-C10; 26-28 dorsal vertebrae; fused
scapulocoracoid with primary coracoid emargination.
acteosaurs, coniasaurs, and dolichosaurs might all be
assigned to thè Dolichosauridae, in association with recent
studies proposing a sistergroup relationship between all
these taxa and thè mosasauroids (Caldwell, 1999b; Lee &
Caldwell, 2000), highlight thè phylogenetic importance of
these animals in understanding thè evolution of Mesozoic
marine squamates. Recent work by Caldwell & Lee (1997),
Lee & Caldwell (1998, 2000), and Caldwell (1999b), all of
which examined thè larger problem of squamate phylogeny,
found Serpentes to be nested within a squamate clade
including dolichosaurids and mosasauroids, a group
referred to as thè Pythonomorpha (see Cope’s [1869] orig¬
inai diagnosis of this group as contrasted with Lee &
Caldwell’s [2000] slightly modified definition).
To date, thè one hundred and fifty-five years of investi-
gation on Cenomanian marine squamates has achieved thè
consensus view that thè fossil forms (i.e., pontosaurs,
adriosaurs, acteosaurs, coniasaurs, and dolichosaurs) are
closely related to each other; there is also a reasonable
degree of consensus that these squamates share a common
ancestor with mosasaurids and aigialosaurids. However, as
to thè phylogenetic position of this larger group within
squamates, and of snakes with any one group of squamates,
there is no common agreement. For thè purposes of this
study, I will consider pontosaurs, adriosaurs, acteosaurs,
coniasaurs, and dolichosaurs as informai generic groupings
assigned to thè Pythonomorpha; thè Dolichosauridae, thè
conventional taxon for all these taxa, will be treated as
including only Dolichosaurus and Coniasaurus.
Pontosaurus kornhuberi sp. nov.
(Figs. 1,2, 3A-B, 4-18)
Synonomy: cf. Pontosaurus sp. Caldwell & Dal Sasso,
2004.
Derivatio nominis: named in honour of Prof. A.
Kornhuber in recognition of his contributions to thè study
of pythonomorph squamates.
Holotypus: MSNM V3662: complete, articulated
skeleton of one individuai (1,037 mm in length), includ¬
ing trachea, bronchi and squamation, preserved on platy
limestone slab, housed in thè Museo di Storia Naturale di
Milano.
Diagnosis: Maxilla with large medially inflected pre-
maxillary process; jugal with distinct posteroventral
tuberosity; parietal with broad fiat, medially expanded
dorsal table extending onto parietal rami; frontal margin
emarginated with no distinct nasal processes; 10-11 cer¬
vical vertebrae; 26 dorsal vertebrae; 2 pygal vertebrae;
163 caudal vertebrae; non-imbricated scales on cheek,
imbricated scales on remainder of body.
Locus typicum: Quarry in thè Valley of Al Gabour
near Al Nammoura, 10 km southeast of Hadjula, Lebanon
(Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997; Dal Sasso & Renesto, 1999).
6
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
Fig. 1 - Holotype, Pontosaurus kornhuberi , MSNM V3662. A) Interpretative drawing; B) photo. Scale bar = 10 cm.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
7
OSTEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION
State of preservation
MSNM V3662 possesses a long (46 mm long), thin
skull (18.6 mm wide) with large orbits (Figs. 1,2,3 A-B)
and an elongated postorbitai region. The skull is flattened
and preserved in dorsal view, but was clearly compressed
from thè left as thè left mandible is exposed in lateral view
while thè right has rotated medially underneath thè derma-
tocranium; only thè mediai aspect of thè right mandible is
visible to thè right of thè parietal. Likewise, thè left maxil-
la has shifted into lateral view, and is broken away; thè right
maxilla is preserved in dorsal view, but is crushed down-
wards so that thè ascending process is compressed onto thè
maxillary shelf. The neck bears at least 10 and probably 1 1
cervical vertebrae with ribs, and a trachea extending to thè
third dorsal rib. The limbs are well developed, and thè forc¬
are both well preserved and in articulation. There are 26
pachyostotic trunk vertebrae and ribs; pachyostosis is not
evident in thè sacrai or caudal skeleton. The tail is excep-
tionally long (680 mm) and possesses 163 caudal vertebrae;
thè number of caudals is reduced by two from thè 1 65 as
reported by Caldwell & Dal Sasso (2004) due to thè recog-
nition in this study of two probable pygal vertebrae. The
haemal spines are almost twice as long as thè neural spines
and articulate with distinct haemapophyses; transverse
processes disappear at thè 8^ caudal vertebra. Detailed
preservation in this fine-grained limestone has preserved
thè squamation both as molds, casts, and in many places,
thè originai material included tonai variation.
Skull
Fig. 2 - Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662, detail of thè skull.
limb (65 mm long) is reduced in size relative to thè rear-
limb (98 mm long); thè right forelimb is not well exposed
but thè left is well preserved and articulated. The rearlimbs
The skull is represented by thè premaxilla, right max¬
illa and partial left maxilla, fragments of thè septomaxil-
lae, vomers, and possibly nasals, partial right and left pre-
frontals, complete right and left jugals, thè left postor¬
bitai, postfrontal, and squamosal, and fragments of thè
right-side series of thè same, a well preserved frontal, and
parietal, thè supraoccipital, a well -preserved left exoccip-
ital-opisthotic and fragments of thè right, probable left
and right prootics, a left quadrate with fragments of thè
right, a well preserved left dentary with teeth, a well pre¬
served left surangular with a poorly exposed right suran-
gular, left and right articulars (Figs. 2, and 3 A-B), and
perhaps thè quadrate ramus of thè right pterygoid.
Premaxilla
The premaxilla is a single bone and is well preserved
though broken into small fragments along thè length of
thè premaxillary bar (Fig. 4 A-B). The anterior tooth-
bearing portion of thè premaxilla (Fig. 4 C-D) is a small
median element that flares right and left to support two
teeth on each side of thè sagittal piane (Figs. 2, 3, and 4).
At its anterior tip, it is broad and fiat with a small space
equivalent to thè width of one tooth base separating thè
right and left pairs of teeth; thè anterior extent of thè bone
is posteriorly deepened just enough to support thè alveoli
for thè four teeth and immediately becomes constricted
posterior to this point in order to form a long and thin nar-
ial bar similar to that of Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-
D) (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004).
The premaxilla and its internarial bar is much better
preserved in MSNM V3662 than that of thè type of
Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 A-D) and shows an impor¬
tai feature shared in common with Coniasaurus gracilo-
dens Caldwell, 1999. On thè right side of thè premaxilla
in MSNM V3662 there is a small, laterally positioned
fossa or small platform that lies below thè level of thè
internarial bar and immediately posterior to thè tooth
hearing portion of thè bone (Fig. 4 C-D). Immediately lat¬
eral, and stili in proximate articulation is a matching,
8
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
Fig. 3 - Skulls of Pontosaurus kornhuberi MSNM V3662 (A-B) and Pontosaurus lesinensis GBA 1873/4/2 (C-D). A) Dorsal surface of skull; B) line draw-
ing ot sanie; C) dorsal surtace of skull; D) line drawing of same. Abbreviations: a, atlas intercentrum; an, atlas neural arch; ax, axis; co, coronoid; d, den-
tary; ec, ectopterygoid; epi, epipterygoid; f, frontal; j, jugal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; p, parietal; p-r, parietal ramus; pf, postfrontal; pmx, premaxilla; pof,
postorbito frontal; po, postorbitai; popr, paroccipital process of thè exoccipital-opisthotic; prf, prefrontal; prò, prootic; pt, pterygoid; q, quadrate; rap, retroar-
ticular process; smx-vo-p, septomaxilla and vomeropalatine; soc, supraoccipital; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal; sa, surangular.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
9
Fig. 4 - Snout of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) OverView of palatal elements viewed through external narial opening; B) line drawing
with palatal and snout elements illustrated in color (premaxilla = red; septomaxilla and vomeropalatine = blue; prefrontal = yellow; possible nasal frag-
ment = grey); C) photo detail of premaxilla showing right and lefit maxillae, premaxillary bar, and well preserved premaxillary process of right max-
illa; D) line drawing of same with premaxilla highlighted in red. Abbreviations: see Fig. 3.
10
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
anteromedially directed hook-shaped process extending
from thè maxillary shelf of thè right maxilla. The sidewall
of thè right maxilla is compressed on top of thè maxillary
shelf but thè separation of thè transverse shelf and verti-
cal sidewall are stili easily detected (Fig. 4 C-D).
The morphology and position of this anatomical fea-
ture is identical to that of Coniasaurus gracilodens
(Caldwell, 1999a, figs. 6 B, and 7 B). As was suggested
by Caldwell (1999a), this process, likely a synapomorphy
of C. gracilodens and P. kornhuberi, suggests that thè
very small premaxilla of thè latter and by extension thè
probably equal sized premaxilla of thè former, would
have been mobile around these paired processes. The
morphology of this anatomical feature hints at an unsus-
pected degree of premaxillary mobility in these small
pythonomorph reptiles. The maxilla was not firmly
sutured to thè premaxilla, thè premaxilla was long, and
there is no evidence of a firm suture with thè frontal at thè
posterior tip of thè internarmi bar. Similar snout kinesis is
observed in modern snakes with thè notable difference
being thè significantly shorter narial bar (Frazetta, 1970).
The internarial bar of Pontosaurus kornhuberi appears
to bear a tiny notch at thè posteriormost tip (Fig. 4 A-B);
presumably, this notch contacted some portion of thè
internarial process of thè frontal. It is not clear how firm¬
ly sutured this contact was, but it appears to have been
rather loose. In contrast to P. kornhuberi , thè internarial
bar of P lesinensis is sandwiched between a pair of nasal
bones situated along its lateral borders that appear to
restrict thè premaxillary contribution to thè external nari¬
al opening and seem to prevent its contact with thè frontal
bone, a scenario consistent with all squamates except
mosasauroids (Fig. 3 C-D; Pierce & Caldwell, 2004). If
nasals were present in P kornhuberi, they are not well
represented in MSNM V3662 by anything more than one
possible sliver of bone lying in thè left narial opening
(Fig. 4 A-B). It is also possible that this fragment is a por¬
tion of thè palatine and not thè nasal. Further support for
thè absence of nasal bones is thè different frontal margin
morphology of P kornhuberi as compared to P. lesinensis
(thè former is an effaced “w”-shape while thè latter is a
“w-w”-shape hearing two small nasal processes parasagit-
tal to thè internarial process [Fig. 3 C-D]).
Maxilla
The left maxilla is very poorly preserved and will not be
described here. The right is much better preserved (Figs. 2,
3 A-B, 4) even though it is only visible in dorsal view; an
accurate tooth count is therefore problematic. As described
previously, thè anterior tip of thè maxilla is rounded and
rises gently into a shallow but vertically oriented lateral wall
that frames thè margin of thè narial opening (Fig. 4 A-B).
Mediai to thè sidewall of thè maxilla and near thè anterior
tip of thè bone, is a well-developed premaxillary process
that extends medially and anteriorly towards a fossa or
recess on thè premaxilla; thè maxillary shelf, beginning
immediately posterior to thè premaxillary process, bears a
scalloped margin lateral to its contact with thè vomers. In
dorsal view thè anterior two-thirds of thè maxilla shows an
identical morphology to thè maxilla of Coniasaurus gracilo¬
dens (Caldwell, 1999a). The difference between thè maxil-
lae of P. kornhuberi and C. gracilodens is thè height and
extent of thè ascending process of thè maxilla in thè latter
taxon. Pontosaurus kornhuberi possesses a low ascending
process, similar to P. lesinensis (Fig. 3 A-D) and a fairly long
anteriorly directed prefrontal that blocks any articulation
between thè frontal and maxilla. In P. lesinensis thè ascend¬
ing process is a long, low sloping feature of thè maxilla that
rises to form only about one half of thè lateral margin of thè
narial opening (Fig. 3 C-D); a similar condition also charac-
terizes P. kornhuberi except that thè maxillary contribution
to thè narial opening is less, comprising about two fifths of
thè margin (Figs. 3 A-B, 4 A-B).
The posterior process of thè maxilla extends below thè
orbit only far enough to contact thè anterior tip of thè
jugal. However, this distance appears to be equal to about
one half of thè orbit diameter; a similar condition is
observed in all mosasauroid pythonomorphs (Russell,
1967). Due to preservation and orientation of thè element,
it is not possible to determine how far posteriorly, and
perhaps how far beneath thè orbit, thè dentition extended.
In Pontosaurus lesinensis (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004),
Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999a) and C. cras-
sidens (Caldwell & Cooper, 1999), thè dentition termi-
nates at thè anterior margin of thè orbit, as it does in other
mosasauroids; it seems likely that thè same condition
exists in P. kornhuberi.
Although a maxillary tooth count is not possible,
some aspects of thè maxillary dentition are preserved on
thè left side of thè skull and are worth describing. Most of
thè anterior teeth have been crushed and broken but some
are well enough preserved so that their generai outline
can be observed: sharp slightly recurved piercing teeth set
within a mass of ossified tissue as in other mosasauroids
(Russell, 1967; Carroll & deBraga, 1992; deBraga &
Carroll, 1993; Caldwell et al., 2002); fluting similar to
that observed in Pontosaurus lesinensis is not visible.
Septomaxilla
The septomaxillae are likely preserved in Pontosaurus
kornhuberi, but it is not possible to differentiate thè mor¬
phology of either thè left or right element due to dorsal-
ventral compaction of thè bone on top of vomeropalatines
(Fig. 4 A-B). Comparing thè morphology of thè anterior
portion of thè compressed septomaxilla/vomeropalatine
mass to thè probable septomaxilla of Coniasaurus
gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999a, fig. 9), where thè latter is
shaped like an obtuse triangle with a tali, median crest
paralleling thè internarial bar indicates that thè septomax¬
illa of Pontosaurus kornhuberi was similarly shaped and
anteriorly located. However, it also must be remembered
that this is not a certain identification but rather a discus-
sion of thè generai similarities between these two taxa; by
comparison, there are no preserved remnants of thè sep¬
tomaxillae in Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D).
Vomeropalatines
As with thè septomaxilla, it is not possible, due to
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
11
preservational factors, to determine whether or not thè
vomers and palatines were separate bones. As it has been
shown that thè two elements are fused in mosasaurs
(Russell, 1967) and Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell,
1999a, figs. 10, 11), these two elements are discussed
here as though they were a single fused structure (thè ele¬
ments are not distinguishable in Pontosaurus lesinensis
[see Pierce & Caldwell, 2004]).
The vomeropalatines of MSNM V3662 are elongate,
strap-like elements that parallel thè sagittal piane but do
not appear to meet at thè midiine (Fig. 4 A-B). The poste-
rior extent of thè bone appears to be beneath thè frontal
(thè palatine ramus), but there is some uncertainty as
exposed and this statement must be made only tentatively.
Anteriorly, at a point equivalent to thè anterior termination
of thè prefrontal, thè vomeropalatine extends a lateral
process to contact thè maxilla (maxillary process of thè
palatine); at this point thè vomeropalatine continues ante¬
riorly following thè margin of thè maxillary shelf to thè
mediai divergence of that shelf where it forms thè premax-
illary process (Fig. 4 A-B). The tips of thè vomeropalatine
appear to diverge away from thè midi ine as they converge
towards thè premaxillary process. Details such as thè posi-
tion of Jacobson’s Organ, or thè aperture of thè mediai
palatine sinus, are not visible as preserved.
Prefrontal
The prefrontal is an anteriorly elongate element with
thè anterior process extending at least three-fifths of thè
length of thè narial opening along thè mediai surface of
thè side wall of thè maxilla. Posterodorsally, thè pre¬
frontal contacts thè frontal along about one quarter of thè
length of thè frontal and then descends ventrally to con¬
tact thè anterior tip of thè jugal and thè posterior process
of thè maxilla. Overall, thè exposed surface of thè right
prefrontal, as preserved, resembles thè sail of a tali sail-
boat (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 4 A-B). The articulation with thè
maxilla is an important and characteristic feature of pon-
tosaurs and is shared in common by both species: thè
suture is long and low and slopes gently towards thè nar¬
ial opening. The result is that there is no ascending
process of thè maxilla, creating a similar profile to that
observed in many extant snakes; this feature contrasts
sharply with that described by Caldwell (1999a) for
Coniasaurus gracilodens where thè maxilla has a well-
developed ascending process. The difference between
Pontosaurus lesinensis and P. kornhuberi is that in thè
former thè maxilla and prefrontal comprise equal por-
tions of thè margin of thè narial opening, whereas, as
noted for thè latter, thè prefrontal is three fifths of thè
margin of thè opening.
Nasals
As noted previously, it is not clear from thè specimen
(Fig. 4 A-B) as to thè presence or absence of thè nasal bones.
This is in direct contrast to thè relatively well-preserved
nasals of Pontosaurus lesinensis , where thè nasals are thin,
fiat and paired, (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004) (Fig. 3 C-D).
Lacrimai
It is not possible to identify thè presence or absence of
a lacrimai in Pontosaurus kornhuberi as thè area on either
side of thè skull, ventral to thè prefrontals, is heavily
crushed and deformed (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 4 A-B). As was
noted by Pierce & Caldwell (2004), Kornhuber (1873)
had reported a trace of thè right lacrimai posterodorsal to
thè maxilla and anterior to thè jugal, but such an element
was not visible to thè former authors. The massive size of
thè prefrontal would suggest, if analogous to snakes, that
thè lacrimai is absent in both species of Pontosaurus as it
is in snakes, Pachyrhachis (Lee & Caldwell, 1998) and
many other squamate groups (Estes et al ., 1988).
Jugal
Both thè right and left jugal are well preserved in
Pontosaurus kornhuberi (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 A-C). The ante¬
rior edge of thè jugal arch extends forward to meet thè pre¬
frontal anteriorly and thè maxilla ventrally and may well
have extended anteriorly past thè orbit as in other
mosasauroids (deBraga & Carroll, 1993); this observation
is contra thè condition reported in P lesinensis by Pierce &
Caldwell (2004) except that thè anteriormost tip of thè jugal
is not visible and so may well have overlapped thè maxilla,
thus extending anterior to thè orbit.
A second difference is also noted between thè two
species: in P. kornhuberi thè two rami of thè jugal form a
distinct angle at thè posteroventral corner of thè orbit pro-
ducing a well-developed posteroventral tuberosity. In
contrast, in P. lesinensis thè jugal curves gradually in an
anterior direction to contact thè lateral process of thè pos-
torbital. In all other respects, thè jugal of Pontosaurus
lesinensis is of roughly similar size and shape to that of P
kornhuberi (Fig. 3 A-D).
Frontal
The frontal is a long, fiat element that comprises
approximately one-third of thè total length of thè skull
(Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 A-B). As is common to pontosaurs and
coniasaurs thè outline in dorsal view resembles an hour-
glass that is broadly expanded at both its anterior and pos¬
terior ends and is constricted above thè orbits (Caldwell,
1999a; Pierce & Caldwell, 2004); this configuration is
very similar to that of modera macroteiids (Estes et al.,
1988). In Pontosaurus kornhuberi, thè anterior expansion
of thè frontal is only marginally more narrow than thè
posterior expansion at thè frontal-parietal suture; this
contrasts with thè condition in P lesinensis where thè
anterior expansion is noticeably more narrow than thè
expansion at thè frontal-parietal suture, and with
Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999a, figs. 4, 5)
where thè posterior expansion is twice thè width of thè
anterior expansion.
In Pontosaurus kornhuberi, thè anterior border of thè
frontal has only three processes (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 4 A-B): one
large sagittal process and two equal-sized large lateral
processes. In contrast, thè frontal of P lesinensis has five
processes: one large sagittal process, two large lateral
processes, and two small parasagittal processes (Fig. 3 C-
12
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
D). In both species, thè external edge of thè lateral process-
es articulates with thè prefrontals, while thè internai rim
forms thè posterior margin of thè external narial opening.
Pierce & Caldwell (2004) noted that thè nasals of P.
lesinensis were clasped by thè unpaired sagittal, and paired
parasagittal, processes. The absence of thè paired parasagit-
tal processes in P. kornhuberi may well relate to thè absence
of identifiable nasal bones. The sagittal process of
Pontosaurus kornhuberi is smooth as it is in P. lesinensis ;
in contrast, thè sagittal process of Coniasaurus gracilodens
bears a low but clearly defined sagittal crest that extends
posteriorly about one quarter of thè length of thè frontal.
At its midpoint, thè constricted frontal forms thè dor-
sal margin of thè orbit. The prefrontal and postor-
bitofrontal do not meet above thè orbits as they do in
higher mosasauroids (Russell, 1967), but are widely sep-
arated over thè orbit as they are in Pontosaurus lesinensis
(Fig. 3 C-D) and Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell,
1999a, figs. 4, 5).
The posterior border of thè frontal describes an obtusely
angled w-shape along its margin with thè parietal; this mar¬
gin represents a gap of considerable size and is not interpret-
ed as an artifact of preservation, but rather is very well pre-
served. It is possible that this morphology represents thè
adult conditimi and that there was a high degree of mesoki-
nesis in pontosaurs. It is also possible that ffontal-parietal
ossification was delayed in this animai, either that it was a
younger individuai or that in fact dermatocranial ossifica¬
tion was delayed in Pontosaur kornhuberi. In comparison,
thè frontal-parietal margin in Pontosaurus lesinensis is rela-
tively simple and straight with thè two bones fitting togeth-
er very tightly (Fig. 3 C-D).
Parietal
The parietal is a single element composing approxi-
mately one-third of thè total skull length (Figs. 2, 3 A-B,
5 C, 6 A-D). In generai terms, thè suture with thè frontal
is long and describes an obtuse “w”-shaped outline with
large parietal lappets lying below thè frontal. Along thè
lateral edge of thè frontal-parietal suture, thè anterolater-
al projection of thè parietal is broadly overlapped by thè
postorbitofrontal. Laterally and ventrally, thè parietal is
broadly expanded to form a long and deep decensus pari-
etalis (Figs. 3 A-B, 5 C, 6 A) which rises slightly at its
midpoint at thè suturai contact with an element identified
here as thè prootic. The dorsal surface of thè parietal is
not developed into a long thin crest as in P lesinensis
(Fig. 3 C-D), but rather is broad, fiat table-like surface.
The parietal foramen is not as large as that of P. lesinen¬
sis; it is also an equivalent distance posterior to thè pari-
etal-frontal suture in both species.
The prootic margin of thè parietal also appears to con¬
tact thè margin of thè supraoccipital; thè latter margin is
broad and wide in its contact with thè parietal and is in thè
sanie piane; thè supraoccipital does not He beneath thè pari¬
etal as in lizards but is in thè sanie piane and articulates
along its anterior margin as in snakes. There is also an inter-
digitating and overlapping suturai contact between thè
supraoccipital and parietal where thè supraoccipital over-
lies thè parietal on thè midiine in large triangular shaped
depression (Fig. 6 A-D). This same condition is observed in
Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D). The differences
between P. kornhuberi and P. lesinensis are preservational:
in thè former, thè overlapping portion of thè supraoccipital
is broken away leaving a fractured surface on thè supraoc¬
cipital, whereas in P. lesinensis thè small sagittal-crest like
structure of thè supraoccipital is stili in place.
The parietal ramus for thè suspensorium is well devel¬
oped though only well preserved on thè left side of thè
skull, where it contacts a small supratemporal element
and thè small, underlying paroccipital process of thè
exoccipital-opisthotic. The parietal ramus of Pontosaurus
kornhuberi is broken away and displaced vertically from
its position at thè posterior edge of thè decensus parietal-
is. In its proper articulation, thè parietal ramus would
have been oriented obliquely and would have formed a
continuous surface with thè decensus parietalis as in P.
lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D).
Postorbitofrontal
The postfrontal and postorbitai of Pontosaurus kornhu¬
beri appear to have fused to form a single, multi-rami ele¬
ment, thè postorbitofrontal; thè element is very well pre¬
served on thè left side of thè skull, but very poorly pre¬
served on thè right. All descriptions given here are of thè
left side of thè skull. Close inspection indicates thè pres-
ence of an unidentified element immediately anterior to thè
left postorbitofrontal (Figs. 3 A-B, 5 A-C) that is considered
here to be thè left postfrontal. Squamates show a perplex-
ing and problematic degree of plasticity in thè presence,
absence, or fusion, of thè elements comprising thè anterior
portions of thè supratemporal arcade. For example, some
groups possess only a postorbitai (snakes), while others
possess both postfrontals and postorbitals (e.g.,
Pontosaurus lesinensis [Fig. 3 C-D]), while others, such as
species assigned to thè varanid genus, Varanus, and P.
kornhuberi , possess a single, apparently fused, postor¬
bitofrontal element. Some possess supernumerary ele¬
ments, such as pythons, which have added a supraorbital
bone. Assuming that thè anterior element is not a true post¬
frontal, thè remaining description will focus on thè mor¬
phology of thè left postorbitofrontal.
The left postorbitofrontal is a quadri-radiate element
with four distinct rami contacting four very different
components of thè dermatocranium. The anterior or
frontal ramus is a moderately long and thin spline of bone
that begins at roughly thè frontal-parietal suture and
clasps thè lateral margin of thè frontal to a position rough¬
ly near thè beginning of thè supraorbital constriction
(Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 A-C). The mediai or parietal ramus of
thè postorbitofrontal is very short and medially directed.
It clasps thè margin of thè parietal table just posterior to
thè frontal-parietal suture; there is a short section of thè
postorbitofrontal, between thè frontal and parietal rami,
that firmly abuts thè lateral wing of thè parietal immedi¬
ately posterior to thè frontal-parietal suture. The lateral or
jugal ramus of thè postorbitofrontal projects laterally only
a short distance; this ramus is thickened posteriorly with
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA. PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
13
Fig. 5 - Mid-dorsal surface of thè dermatocranium of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) Photo detail of lcft postorbital-frontal-parietal; B)
line drawing of same; C) oblique view of left side of skull showing configuration of decensus parietalis and contact with Ieft prootic. Abbreviations:
see Fig. 3.
14
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
I ig. 6 - Posterodorsal surface of dermatocranium of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) OverView of parietal; B) detail of supraoccipital and
overlapping, interdigitating suturai contact onto parietal; C) detail of parietal ramus, squamosal, exoccipital, supraoccipital; D) line drawing of ‘C\ E)
left quadrate. F) line drawing of same. Abbreviations: see Fig. 3.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
15
! its anteriormost edge beginning parallel to thè piane of
thè frontal-parietal suture. It is not clear if some portion
of thè jugal ramus was directed ventrally; however, it is
possible that thè ascending portion of thè jugal contacted
a small facet on thè ventral surface of thè jugal ramus
similar to some mosasaurs (Russell, 1967) and many
squamates (Estes et al., 1988). The posterior or squamos-
al ramus of thè postorbitofrontal is elongate and thin
(Figs. 5 A-C, 6 A-C) extending posteriorly to a point
equal to thè contact of thè parietal and supraoccipital. It
overlaps thè squamosal laterally and dorsally in an
interfingering suture. The distance between thè postor¬
bitofrontal bar and thè parietal crest is rather far even
though thè supratemporal fenestra appears to be relative-
ly small anteriorly (Figs. 5 A-C, 6 A-C).
Postfrontal?
It is not clear if thè postfrontal is present as a separate
element in Pontosaurus kornhuberi even though it is
clearly separate in P. lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D). The postor¬
bitofrontal, described previously, shows thè typical squa¬
mate morphology of a fused postorbitai ramus and body
(posterior ramus contacting thè squamosal and framing
thè supratemporal fenestra, main body contacting thè
jugal) and postfrontal ramus (anterior process clasping
thè frontal-parietal suture and extending anterolaterally
along thè frontal). However, there is an extra element in P
kornhuberi that lies anterior and lateral to thè anterior
ramus of postorbitofrontal thè identity of which is uncer-
tain (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 A-C). The element is indicated with
a “?” on Fig. 3 B. It is possible that it is a fragment of thè
pterygoid, or perhaps is a displaced palpebrai bone, but as
most of thè skull is very well articulated, thè latter possi-
bility is considered remote. The element bears a striking
resemblance to, and is in a similar position to, thè post¬
frontal of P. lesinensis which is a large boomerang-shaped
element (Fig. 3 C-D) that clasps both thè frontal and pari¬
etal along its mediai border and attaches to, but does not
fuse with, thè postorbitai along its posterolateral surface.
The fusion of thè postfrontal and postorbitai in form-
ing thè postorbitofrontal is not a well-understood process,
nor is it common among squamates. It is also clear ffom
a survey of modern squamates that there is great deal of
plasticity in thè formation and fusion of thè dermatocra-
nial elements of thè supratemporal and postorbitai
arcades (see Estes et al., 1988). Non-scolecophidian
snakes are considered to possess only a postorbitai with
thè exception of Dinilysia patagonica which also possess-
es a discrete postfrontal (Caldwell & Albino, 2002);
amphisbaenians and dibamids possess neither element;
Varanus possesses a single postorbitofrontal element
while Lanthanotus and Heloderma have only a post¬
frontal with thè postorbitai having been lost; anguids typ-
ically have both a postfrontal and postorbitai, as do most
other scincomorphs; gekkotans are treated as possessing
a postorbitofrontal even though thè posterior ramus is
missing and iguanians show both a single element and
paired element condition.
Squamosal
The squamosal is a thin band of bone that forms thè pos¬
terolateral border of thè supratemporal fenestra (Figs. 3 A-B,
5 C, 6 C-D). At thè midpoint of thè supratemporal fenestra,
thè squamosal articulates with thè ramus of thè postor¬
bitofrontal; it underlies that element in a long, clasping artic-
ulation (Fig. 6 C-D). At its posterior tip, thè squamosal con-
tacts thè quadrate laterally and thè supratemporal medially.
The element is slightly bent laterally at its posterior contact
with thè supratemporal and quadrate. A similar morphology
is observed in Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D).
Supratemporal
The supratemporal is a small wedge of bone that as
preserved, appears to articulate with thè squamosal,
quadrate and parietal ramus. Presumably it also contacted
thè paroccipital process of exoccipital-opisthotic; howev¬
er, this is not clear as preserved and it is important to note
that thè paroccipital process appears to be quite short.
Supraoccipital
The supraoccipital of Pontosaurus kornhuberi (Figs.
2, 3 A-B, 6 A-D) is nearly identical in its morphology to
that of P lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D) as reported by Pierce &
Caldwell (2004); among squamates thè pontosaur
supraoccipital is a uniquely configured bone. The element
broadly contacts thè posterior margin of thè parietal along
its dorsal surface, not ventrally as in most lizard squamate
groups. The element is broadly expanded along this con¬
tact and is posteriorly also very broad. The posterior mar¬
gin of thè supraoccipital is rounded and smooth and not
emarginated as it is in many lizard squamates. There is no
evidence that exoccipital-opisthotic bones met at thè mid¬
iine above thè foramen magnum; it appears therefore that
thè dorsal border of thè foramen magnum was formed
exclusively by thè supraoccipital.
Posterolaterally, thè supraoccipital contacts thè dorsal
margin of thè exoccipital-opisthotic bone dose to thè ori-
gin of thè paroccipital process. Anterolaterally thè
supraoccipital appears to contact thè posterolateral mar¬
gin of thè decensus parietalis to its contact with thè proot-
ic, where thè supraoccipital appears to contact that mar¬
gin in a smooth are (Fig. 6 A-B).
On median dorsal surface of thè supraoccipital (Fig. 6
A-B) is a small t-shaped area of roughened periosteum.
On first observation this area appears to be a broken sur¬
face, but under high magnification it is clear that a small
fragment of unossified tissue likely occupied this region
and overlapped thè parietal on thè dorsal surface of that
bone. As thè supraoccipital is an endochondral element of
thè chondrocranium, it is not unlikely that thè missing tis¬
sue was not ossified. Reconstructing thè t-shaped portion
and thè portion that overlaps thè parietal presents a final
morphology to thè supraoccipital of Pontosaurus kornhu¬
beri that is identical to that of P lesinensis.
In Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D) thè supraoccipi¬
tal has a rectangular base and a clover-shaped anteromedi-
al shelf (Fig. 2). The “stem” and thè two lateral “leaves” of
thè shelf rest on top of, and form a v-shaped suture with,
16
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
thè parietal; this configuration comes dose to that of
snakes, but thè supraoccipital in snakes never sits above thè
parietal. Instead thè supraoccipital in snakes is level with
and slightly on-lapped by thè parietal. The third mediai
“leaf” forms a crest that runs down thè center of thè
supraoccipital’s rectangular base. The rectangular base
graduai ly slopes caudally underneath thè parietal until it
contacts thè atlas posteriorly, a configuration that typifies
non-snake squamates (Estes et al., 1988). On its lateral
margin thè supraoccipital meets thè left and right exoccipi-
tal in a straight, anterior-posterior directed suture.
Exoccipital
As preserved and exposed thè exoccipital-opisthotic is a
long, curving acute triangle-shaped element with a short,
robust paroccipital process. It contacts thè supraoccipital
dorsomedially, and thè prootic anterolaterally. In
Pontosaurus lesinensis thè exoccipital-opisthotic shows
exactly thè same acute triangle outline, is broad along its
contact with thè supraoccipital (Fig. 3 C-D), and bears a
large, ovai paroccipital process ventrally (this process is
derived from thè opisthotic portion of thè exoccipital bone).
In P. lesinensis thè contact with thè prootic is not visible
while it is visible, though obscured by crushing, on thè right
side of thè skull in P kornhuberi (Fig. 3 A-B).
Prootic?
The right and left prootics are tentatively identified here
though it is possible that thè fragments identified as
prootics are symmetrically fractured portions of thè decen-
sus parietalis (Figs. 3 A-B, 5 C). The observable portions of
both thè right and left prootics are thè anterolateral alar
processes of thè prootic. Ventral to this expansion is an
opening or emargination of varying size and shape that
serves as thè exit point for thè Vth and VIth cranial nerves. In
lizards such as Varanus, thè anterior alar process of thè
prootic contacts thè parietal on only a small point at thè top
of thè projection. In snakes, thè contact with thè decensus
parietalis is along thè full length of thè superior margin of
thè alar process creating distinct exit points, as foramina for
thè V* and VI* cranial. As preserved in MSNM V3662, thè
type and only specimen of Pontosaurus kornhuberi , thè
decensus parietalis and superior margin of thè prootic and
alar process also appear to have a continuous suturai con¬
tact, unlike thè condition in Varanus.
Quadrate
The left quadrate is almost perfectly preserved in later¬
al view in Pontosaurus kornhuberi (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 C). It
is a C-shaped structure with a pronounced suprastapedial
process, a well-developed stapedial notch, a very small but
present infrastapedial process, and a well-developed tym-
panic ala or conch, comparable in particular to that of
Pontosaurus lesinensis, and more generally, to those of
other mosasauroids (Russell, 1967; Carroll & deBraga,
1992; deBraga & Carroll, 1993). As was noted by Pierce &
Caldwell (2004), thè quadrate of thè teiid Dracaena
(FMNH 207657) is strikingly similar as well. As with
Pontosaurus lesinensis, thè quadrate appears to articulate
with thè parietal ramus, thè squamosal and supratemporal
(thè latter bone is poorly preserved).
Pterygoid
The pterygoids are not well exposed in MSNM V3662
with only a short section, likely thè suborbitai portion of
thè left pterygoid, exposed in thè floor of thè left orbitai
opening (Figs. 2, 3 A-B, 5 A-C). Little detail is visible that
merits description or comparison to either Pontosaurus
lesinensis or Coniasaurus.
Epipterygoid
Right and left elements that might be identifiable as
thè epipterygoid are visible on either side of thè parietal,
between thè anteroventral margin of thè decensus pari¬
etalis and thè postorbitofrontal (Fig. 3 A-B). The element
is small and rounded in cross-section and directed anteri-
orly from its contact with thè decensus parietalis; this lat¬
ter position is a taphonomic artifact. While thè elements
cannot be identified with certainty, they are in thè approx-
imate topological position where disarticulated epiptery-
goids might be anticipated.
A similar element is well preserved in thè type of
Pontosaurus lesinensis (Fig. 3 C-D). The element is a
simple, broad, columnar bone whose dorsal tip has tapho-
nomically rotated out of position and is now contacting
thè postorbitai bone directly in front of thè postorbital-
squamosal suture.
Dentary
The right dentary is not exposed in MSNM V3662,
while thè left is very poorly preserved and somewhat frac¬
tured and fragmented. The left element makes up about
two fifths of thè length of thè mandible (Figs. 2, 3 A-B)
and bears at least four mandibular foramina. It is an elon-
gate and very thin element with a large number of teeth;
while it is not possible to count thè number of tooth posi-
tions, it is clear that there is space for approximately
twenty teeth. The exposed dentary teeth, like those of thè
maxilla and those of Pontosaurus lesinensis, are laterally
compresseci, sharp, and weakly recurved with what
appear to be shallow furrows or facets. Neither thè inter-
mandibular symphysis, nor thè intramandibular joint are
visible in MSNM V3662 though it seems unlikely that thè
anatomy of these important joints would have been dis¬
similar to P lesinensis (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004) or
Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999a) and C. cras-
sidens (Caldwell & Cooper, 1999).
Coronoid?
An element tentatively identified as part of thè left
coronoid is present just posterior to thè left jugal. The
bone fragment as exposed is poorly preserved and it is not
clear if it connects to thè probable coronoid as exposed (
beneath thè left jugal (Fig. 5 A-C). Flowever, if it is thè
posterior and dorsal portion of thè coronoid, then thè dor¬
sal process was quite tali. In comparison, thè coronoid '
process of Pontosaurus lesinensis is quite small (Pierce &
Caldwell, 2004).
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
17
Surangular
The surangular is an extremely long bone who’s suturai
contacts with thè articular/prearticular and angular cannot
be ascertained as preserved and prepared. The probable
suturai contact with thè articular, which would normally be
exposed on thè posterolateral aspect of thè mandible, is
broken away just ventral to thè articular cotyle and thè
quadrate (Fig. 5 C); it does appear though that thè surangu¬
lar forms part of thè articular surface of thè cotyle similar
to other mosasauroids. The angular does not appear to be
exposed in lateral view. Likewise, no portion of thè splenial
appears to be visible laterally. The intramandibular joint is
also not exposed laterally; unfortunately, at thè point were
thè dentary and surangular meet (Figs. 2, 3 A-C), thè bone
is broken away and thè lateral surface morphology of thè
joint is obscured. Thus it is not possible to ascertain thè
presence or absence of thè splenial, angular and their con-
tribution to thè morphology of thè unique mosasauroid and
serpentiform joint. The only suturai contact that is relative-
ly well preserved is thè surangular-coronoid contact (Fig. 5
A-B); this joint is long and sloping as it rises anteriorly
towards thè dorsally inflected tip of thè jugal. The size and
shape of this element is identical to that of Pontosaurus
lesinensis (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004).
Articular/Prearticular
Details of thè suturai relationships between these ele-
ments are not visible in MSNM V3662 and so similarities
to thè fused elements of Pontosaurus lesinensis cannot be
identified and confirmed. Posteriorly, thè articular widens
and forms thè articular cotyle for thè reception of thè
quadrate. It terminates in an expanded retroarticular
process that is well preserved on both sides of thè skull.
Postcranial skeleton
The postcranial skeleton of Pontosaurus kornhuberi is
thè most complete of any of thè known small aquatic
squamates (Fig. 1). Though there is some minor surface
breakage and crushing throughout, thè postcranium of
MSNM V3662 is very well preserved down to thè last
caudal vertebrae and thè tip of thè tail (i.e., it is car-
bonized but present). The cervical vertebrae and ribs are
preserved in dorsal view as are thè dorsal vertebrae and
ribs, and thè sacrai vertebrae and sacrai processes (Figs.
7, 8). Posterior to thè sacrum and sacrai vertebrae, there
appear to be only two pygal vertebrae (based on thè
absence of haemal arches). Posterior to thè pygal verte¬
brae thè axial skeleton is rotated laterally so that thè tail
and its caudal vertebrae are exposed in left lateral view all
thè way to thè tip of thè tail.
In generai, thè forelimb and girdles are much smaller as
compared to thè rearlimb and girdles. While thè condition
in Pontosaurus lesinensis is unknown due to thè absence of
thè rearlimb, this marked difference in size between thè
forelimb and rearlimb is common to Adriosaurus suessi
(Lee & Caldwell, 2000), Dolichosaurus longicollis
(Caldwell, 2000) and Aphanizocnemus libanensis (Dal
Sasso & Pinna, 1997). It is thè reverse condition to that of
mosasaurs where thè forelimb and girdle are much larger
than thè rearlimb and girdle (Russell, 1967). The condition
observed in adriosaurs, pontosaurs, and dolichosaurs also
contrasts with nearly identical front and rearlimb propor-
tions in aigialosaurs (Caldwell et al., 1995).
The left pectoral girdle is well preserved and has been
slightly translocated so that it is exposed in dorsal view
(internai surfaces are exposed); thè right pectoral girdle is
not visible in any way that permits observation of thè ele¬
ments. Likewise, thè left forelimb is much better pre¬
served and is extended lateral to thè body wall exposing
thè elements of thè carpus; thè right limb is but up and
under thè body wall with only thè distai portion of thè
manus exposed along thè rib cage.
The pelvic girdle is well preserved on thè left side of thè
body but is underneath thè sacrum on thè right side and is
not visible. However, in contrast to thè forelimbs, both thè
left and right rearlimbs are well preserved and exposed in
thè prepared specimen. The tip of thè right femur is hidden
beneath thè sacrum, where as thè entire femur is well
exposed on thè left side. The tarsus and metapodium and
phalanges are all well preserved and exposed.
Axial skeleton
Cervicals
There are ten preserved cervicals in Pontosaurus
kornhuberi , beginning with Cl, represented by thè right
and left atlas neural arches, and ending with an anterior
fragment of CIO, identified as such because there is no
evidence of an elongate rib articulating with thè sternal
cartilages (Figs. 7 A-D, 8 A, 9). The cervical series are all
preserved in dorsal view, and for thè most part have been
sheared through thè neural arch lamina leaving only thè
centrum and fragments of thè neural canal; one vertebra,
C8, was prepared from thè right lateral side to expose thè
cervical peduncle and unfused hypapophysis.
The cervical vertebrae gradually increase in width and
length caudally (Fig. 7 A-C). The right and left neural arch¬
es along with thè anterior portion of thè axis centrum are
visible in dorsal view (Fig. 7 A-D). Pre- and postzy-
gapophyses are variably present, depending on preserva-
tion, from C3-C10. Synapophyses/parapophyses are pres¬
ent from C3-C10; Cl and C2 do not appear to possess cer¬
vical ribs, a condition typical of squamates. Short cervical
ribs are preserved from C3 to C7 on thè left side, and on
C4, C6 and C8 on thè right side. It is not clear, due to
preservation, if any of thè vertebrae possesses zygosphenes
or zygantra.
For Pontosaurus lesinensis Kornhuber (1873) had
originally identified a total of nine cervicals, but what he
thought was thè atlas-axis complex is actually C3 (see
Pierce & Caldwell, 2004). Furthermore, based on mor¬
phology and thè position of thè pectoral girdle, what
Kornhuber identified as thè first two dorsals corresponds
to thè last two cervicals. Therefore, by making thè appro¬
priate changes, thè cervical count increases to twelve. In
18
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
- 1 er\ ical vertebrae of Pontosaurus kornhuberi , MSNM V3662. A) Photographic overview of entire cervical column; B) line drawing of only
thè cer\ ical column (numbers indicate 1-10 cervical vertebrae); C) detail of mid and posterior vertebrae in cervical column showing cervical ribs, neck
scales, and tracheal rings; D) detail of C 1 (note right and left atlas neural arches are flattened and compressed).
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
19
squamates, a cervical count greater than ten has only ever
been observed in pachyophiids (Lee & Caldwell, 1998;
Lee et ai, 1999), pontosaurs and dolichosaurs (Dal Sasso
& Pinna, 1997; Caldwell, 2000; Lee & Caldwell, 2000;
Pierce & Caldwell, 2004).
Dorsals
There are twenty-six dorsal vertebrae present in
MSNM V3662 (Figs. 1, 8 A-B, 10 A). The first and last
three dorsal vertebrae in thè series are poorly preserved
but thè ribs associated with thè left synapophyses are pres¬
ent and quite well preserved making thè count of dorsals
quite accurate. In generai, thè vertebrae and ribs increase
in size and in degree of pachyostosis from thè first dorsal
to approximately thè twenty-first to twenty-second verte¬
bra; at this point there is a marked reduction in thè degree
of pachyostosis and overall size of both thè ribs and verte¬
brae (Figs. 8 A-B, 9, 10 A, 11 A). The 23nd-26th ribs
decrease in size and thickness posteriorly and extend lat-
erally from thè centra in a narrow downward arch folding
towards thè mid-line and forming a somewhat laterally
constricted frame; these last three ribs do not show any
notable degree of pachyostosis (Fig. 1 1 A). In Pontosaurus
lesinensis a corresponding decrease in pachyostosis begins
at dorsal vertebra 2 1 .
Pre- and post-zygaphophyses are present, but for thè
most part poorly preserved. In thè few vertebrae with pre¬
served zygapophyses, thè facets do not appear to incline
above thè horizontal; however, it must be remembered that
there is considerable compression of thè specimen in addi-
tion to thè fracturing present on most vertebrae. Accessory
articulations, specifically zygosphene-zygantral facets are
present in thè dorsal column but can only be observed in thè
mid-dorsal region on vertebrae fifteen through twenty.
For Pontosaurus lesinensis, Kornhuber (1873) origi-
nally counted 30 dorsals, but with thè modified count in
thè cervical region given by Pierce & Caldwell (2004),
thè dorsal count is now recognized to be 28, for a total of
40 presacrai vertebrae. For P. kornhuberi thè count is sim¬
ilari 10-11 cervicals plus 26-27 dorsals for a total of 36-
38 presacrals. The dorsal vertebrae of both species are
larger than thè cervicals in width and length and are more
robustly ossified (Figs. 1 A-B, 7 A-D, 8).
Sacrals
In Pontosaurus kornhuberi thè left pelvic region is
very well preserved, but thè sacrai vertebrae are missing
completely even though fragments of thè first sacrai
transverse process and a complete second sacrai trans¬
verse process are present (Figs. 8 A, 1 1 A-B). Based on
thè articulations of thè first and second transverse
processes, there are clearly only two sacrai vertebrae, a
feature common to most squamates with a sacrum. The
transverse process of thè first sacrai vertebra is largely
broken away where it would have overlain thè ischium;
however, there are some remnants of thè proximal por-
tions of thè process between thè ischium and thè verte¬
bra. The second sacrai vertebra ’s transverse process is
missing as well, but an excellent naturai mold of thè ven-
tral surface of thè process is preserved; thè distai tip of
thè mold stili retains some fragments of bone such that
thè articulation with thè ilium is preserved. A third ver¬
tebra and transverse process is located next to thè ilium
(Fig. 1 1 A-B) but is not fused to it and is interpreted here
as thè first pygal vertebra. In Pontosaurus lesinensis thè
specimen is broken through thè sacrum preserving very
few details of thè anatomy of this region. Pierce &
Caldwell (2004) reported thè presence of two fragmen-
tary transverse processes that they interpreted as belong-
ing to sacrai vertebrae.
Pygals?
There appear to be only two pygals, contra Dal Sasso
& Renesto (1999) who identified three, in Pontosaurus
kornhuberi (Figs. 8 A, 1 1 A-C) based on thè absence of
haemal arches; pygal vertebrae in pythonomorphs are dif-
ferentiated from caudals based on thè absence of haemals.
However, it is important to point out that thè ventral sur-
faces of these two most postsacrai vertebrae are not
observable and thus haemapophyses and their attendant
haemals cannot be ruled out completely. The difference in
haemal counts between this study and that of Dal Sasso &
Renesto (1999) is based on thè position of thè first pre¬
served haemal between thè transverse processes of thè
third and fourth vertebrae posterior to thè sacrum (Figs. 8,
11 C). I tentatively identify these two vertebrae as pygals.
These two probable pygals, like thè sacrals and dorsals,
are broken through thè neural arches and preserve little
information on thè morphology of thè zygapophyses and
neural arches. Unlike thè caudals, thè pygals are not pre¬
served in lateral view and so thè left transverse processes
are well preserved displaying their dorsal surfaces. The first
pygal vertebra ’s transverse process has an unusual mor¬
phology as compared to that of thè second pygal (Fig. 1 1 A-
C); thè process is anteriorly directed and narrows towards
thè tip resembling a small “j”-shape. This morphology is
not atypical of pygal or first caudal vertebrae as these trans¬
verse processes are usually modified to support lymph node
clusters located superior to thè cloaca; such transverse
processes are referred to as lymphapophyses. By compari-
son, thè transverse process of thè second pygal is directed
laterally, is narrow at thè distai tip and widest proximally.
The next most posterior vertebra is also preserved in
oblique dorsal view but is identified here as thè first caudal
based on thè estimation that its posteroventral margin artic-
ulated with thè large disarticulated haemal arch located to
thè left of it (Figs. 8 A, 1 1C).
Caudals
The tail is extremely well preserved, numbering 163
caudal vertebrae from thè last pygal to thè tip of thè tail;
at thè tail tip thè vertebral count is problematic due to thè
extremely small size of these most-caudal elements (Fig.
8 A, C-F). Overall, thè caudal vertebrae are strongly lat¬
erally compressed and longer than they are tali and wide.
The tips of thè haemals are fused so that they form a true
haemal arch, however thè arches articulate with thè
haemapophyses instead of being fused to them. Haemals
20
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
are present along thè tail to caudal vertebra 139. For
approximately thè first 55 caudal vertebrae, thè haemal
arches are nearly twice as long as thè neural spines; by
about vertebra 55-60, thè haemals and neural spines are
nearly thè same length. From this point, to vertebra 139,
where preserved, thè haemals and neural spines are of
equal length. The anteriormost 60 vertebral elements
make up slightly more than half thè length of thè tail, with
thè remaining half of thè length containing thè other one
hundred and three vertebrae. The effect on thè aspect of
thè tail is that for at least thè first half of its length, thè
hypaxial depth is nearly twice that of thè epaxial depth
based on osteology alone; factoring in thè soft-tissue
effect on tail aspect, it becomes clear that ventral to thè
haemal arches thè tail is at least that same haemal depth
again (Fig. 8 C-D). Epaxially, thè marginai squamation
indicates a soft tissue depth equal to thè height of thè neu¬
ral spines. Thus, between its osteology and soft tissue
anatomy, thè tail of Pontosaurus kornhuberi was at least
twice as deep as thè osteology would suggest.
The first and second caudals possess large transverse
processes and are preserved in dorsal view. However, each
has a large transverse process, equivalent in length to those
of thè two pygal vertebrae (Fig. 1 1 A-C). For all four of
these vertebrae it is likely that thè varied heads of thè m.
caudofemoralis originated here. This muscle body is inte¬
grai to strong tail driven propulsion and requires significant
origin sites if it is to be a useful locomotory muscle.
All caudal centra are longer than they are tali, which is
thè opposite condition to that observed in mosasaurids and
aigialosaurids (Russell, 1967; deBraga & Carroll, 1993).
Another interesting feature is thè rather steep posterior
angle of all neural spines along thè column. This inclination
would suggest fairly strong ligamentous connections of thè
varied m. spinocaptis muscles between vertebrae.
The very small vertebrae of thè distai tip of thè tail are
slightly disarticulated and bent backwards on each other
so that in a very small area (approximately 1.5 cm) there
are thirteen caudal vertebrae. The distai carbonized tip of
thè tail contains no vertebral centra (Fig. 8 F).
Pectoral girdle and forelimb
The left pectoral girdle is relatively well preserved and
exposed in internai view. Fragments of thè scapula are pre¬
served, as are portions of thè clavicle, interclavicle, cora¬
coid, supracoracoid and sternal cartilage (Figs. 9, 10 A).
I he right forelimb is not well exposed in Pontosaurus korn-
h uberi, having twisted beneath thè body during burial.
However, thè left forelimb is very well preserved and is
exposed in palmar view (Fig. 10 A-E). This description will
therefore focus on thè left forelimb.
Scapula and coracoid
The scapula and coracoid may well be fused into a sin¬
gle scapulocoracoid element similar to that of thè
aigialosaur Opetiosaurus (Carroll & DeBraga, 1992;
DeBraga & Carroll, 1993) and Pontosaurus lesinensis.
but as preserved, it is not absolutely clear; thè alternative,
as in most aigialosaurs (Carroll & DeBraga, 1992) and
both Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999) and
Dolichosaurus longicollis (Caldwell, 2000) is that thè two
elements are separate. Evidence suggesting that there was
fusion of these two elements is derived from thè absence
of an identifiable suturai contact along thè anterior mar-
gin of thè coracoid. Additionally, because thè scapula is a
small element in P. kornhuberi and is not well preserved,
it is not clear if it is emarginated (in P lesinensis it is not
emarginated). Similar to mosasaurs (Russell, 1967;
DeBraga & Carroll, 1993), Haasia (Polcyn et al., 1999),
Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell, 1999) and
Aphanizocnemus (Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997), thè coracoid
portion is significantly larger, possesses an anterior (pri-
mary) emargination and a fan-like posterior margin. A
single coracoid foramen is present in thè middle portion
of thè element.
Supracoracoid cartilage
The exact outline of thè supracoracoid cartilage is not
clear as its contact with thè sternal cartilage is not well-
preserved; thè only point where its contact with thè ster¬
nal cartilage is clear is immediately to thè right of thè
humerus where thè supracoracoid cartilage is seen to
extend past and overtop of thè sternal cartilage (Fig. 9).
However, thè semi-circular outline of thè supracoracoid
cartilages contact with thè coracoid is well defined, indi-
cating that thè coracoid was mobile within thè supracora¬
coid cartilage assembly.
Interclavicle
The interclavicle is represented by thè left transverse
process lying to thè left of C 1 0 and immediately anterior
to thè element identified as thè clavicle (Fig. 9), and by
thè sagittal ramus extending parallel to thè long axis of
thè body immediately to thè right of thè supracoracoid
cartilage. As exposed, thè sagittal ramus of thè interclav¬
icle only extends posteriorly to thè mid-point of thè cora¬
coid; likely, as preserved and prepared, thè distai extent of
thè ramus is incomplete. The interclavicle of Pontosaurus
lesinensis is similar in shape but slightly longer as pre¬
served (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004).
Clavicle
The clavicle is a relatively robust element that is bro-
ken on both its proximal and distai extremities leaving lit¬
tle to describe of its anatomy other than to say it shows a
sloping curvature at midlength.
Sternal cartilage
The sternal cartilage is calcified, exposed in internai
view, with only thè left side of thè element exposed in
MSNM V3662. There are three posteriorly directed articu-
lar points for costai cartilages (Fig. 9). The element is not
exposed far enough posteriorly to determine if thè third
costai articulation point is thè last, minus thè xiphisternal
cartilage articulations, as observed in Dolichosaurus longi¬
collis (Caldwell, 2000) which also only has three costai car-
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA. PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
21
Fig. 8 - Axial skeleton of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) Line drawing of MSNM V3662 with axial skeletal regions colour coded (yel-
low=cervical; red=dorsal; light blue=sacral; dark blue=pygal; green=caudal); B) detail of dorsal vertebrae and ribs; C) anterior caudals; D) mid-cau-
dal vertebrae; E) distai caudals; F) distal-most caudals to soft-tissue tip of tail; G) line drawing of caudal skeleton indicating numbers of vertebrae
along thè column (1-163).
22
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
Fig. 9 - Pectoral girelle of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. Abbreviations: cl?, clavicle; co, coracoid; h, humerus; ic, interclavicle; se, scapu-
la; sCor, supracoracoid cartilage; steart, sternal cartilage; 1-3, costai cartilage articulation points.
tilage articulations on thè sternal cartilage. The number
contrasts with thè aigialosaur Carsosaurus marchesetti
(Caldwell et al., 1995) where there are at least five costai
cartilage articulation points in addition to thè xiphisternal
cartilages.
Humerus
The humerus is a short element (16.5 mm long),
crushed throughout most its length, and is slightly con-
stricted at mid-shaft and expanded at both ends. There is no
evidence of a proximal epiphysis though thè humeral head
is slightly broken away medially (Fig. 9). The distai expan-
sion appears to possess a small-ossified epiphysis at thè
contact with thè ulnar head (Fig. 10 A). Both thè ectepi-
condylar and entepicondylar foramina are absent.
Proximally, near thè broken portion of thè head, there is a
stout tubercle and small crest for thè attachment of thè del-
toid musculature. Distally, there is a large somewhat flat-
tened capitulum and a troclea; although thè dimensions are
smaller, thè distai epiphysis resembles that of Opetiosaurus
(deBraga & Carroll, 1993) and Haasia (Polcyn et ai,
1999).
Radius and ulna
The radius and ulna are of similar size and are distally
divergent along their contact with thè proximal row of
carpals (Fig. 10 A-C); proximally thè two elements are in
dose contact along thè distai margin of thè humerus. The
effect of this divergence is that thè antebrachium, and thus
forearm, is extremely wide and flattened. It is also likely that
pronation of thè forearm was not possible thus impeding
forelimb assisted terrestrial locomotion. This form of distai
divergence is observed in most mosasaurs (Russell, 1967)
and thè dolichosaurs Adriosaurus (Lee & Caldwell, 2000)
and Pontosaurus lesinensis (Pierce & Caldwell, 2004).
Divergent epipodials also characterize aigialosaurs such as
Carsosaurus marchesetti (Caldwell et al., 1995) and
Opetiosaurus bucchichi (Carroll & deBraga, 1992) but to a
much lesser extent and it appears as though pronation of thè
manus was possible due to thè configuration of thè radius.
In Pontosaurus kornhuberi thè radius is a simple rod-
like element that is slightly curved along its antebrachial
margin. The ulna is thickened proximally forming a weak
olecranon process, is narrow through thè antebrachial
portion of thè shaft, and then expands somewhat at thè
contact with thè ulnare.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
23
Fig. 10 - Forelimbs of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) OverView of anterior trunk and right and left forelimbs; B) photodetail of left fore-
limb; C) line drawing of left forelimb; D) photodetail of right forelimb; E) line drawing of right forelimb. Abbreviations: cl, centrale; h, humerus; in.
intermedium; r, radius; ra, radiale; ul, ulna; uln, ulnare; i-v, metacarpals 1 through 5; 2-5, distai carpals 2 through 5.
24
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
In generai, thè propodial and epipodials are compara¬
tile to those of Pontosaurus lesinensis (Pierce & Caldwell,
2004) and thè dolichosaur Adriosaurus (Lee & Caldwell,
2000) in terms of proportions. Comparisons of this sort
highlight several interesting trends. Of importance to note
in P. kornhuberi are thè relative proportions of thè podial
elements: thè humerus (propodial) and ulna/radius
(epipodials) are of equal length and make up two fifths of
thè length of thè limò, while thè hand (mesopodium,
metapodium and phalanges) comprises thè other three
fifths of thè limbs overall length. There are three apparent
trends in thè evolution of thè pontosaur limb: 1) overall
reduction of thè limbs relative to body size; 2) size reduc-
tion of thè forelimb in relation to thè rearlimb; 3)
increased size of thè manus/pes in relation to thè propo-
dials and epipodials.
Mesopodium (carpus)
The mesopodium possesses both a proximal and distai
row of carpals (Fig. 10 A-C). The proximal row includes
thè radiale, mediai centrale, and intermedium, while thè
distai row includes thè ulnare and distai carpals two
through five. There is no pisiform as preserved and pre-
pared though it is possible that thè postaxial tip of thè
ulnare is thè pisiform (thè surface of most of thè bones of
thè epipodium and mesopodium is broken away and so
sutures are hard to identify).
The radiai and ulnare are thè largest mesopodial ele¬
ments in thè carpus and are both irregularly shaped,
lozenge-like elements. The radiale articulates with both
thè centrale and distai carpai two; thè centrale appears to
contact thè radiale, distai carpals 2 through 4, as well as
thè intermedium. The intermedium is a small element dis-
placed postaxially by thè large centrale (Fig. 10 B-C). The
mid-antebrachial placement of thè centrale, and thè com-
paratively small size of thè intermedium, is a consistent
feature among aigialosaurs (Caldwell et al., 1995;
Caldwell, 1996) and now pontosaurs (see Pierce &
Caldwell, 2004).
Metapodium
All five metacarpals are present (Fig. 10 A-E). The
first and fifth are shorter than two, three and four, and as
a result are more hourglass-shaped than thè longer and
slimmer metacarpals two through four. The fifth
metacarpal articulates with distai carpai five but not thè
ulnare. Likewise, metacarpal one articulates with only thè
radiale, while thè remaining metacarpals articulate with
their respective distai carpals.
Phalanges
The phalangeal fonnula appears to be 2-3-4-5-3, a count
that is primitive for all lepidosauromorphs (Fig. 10 A-E). The
distai phalanges of digits three, four and five are not well pre¬
served but a count is stili possible frorn thè naturai molds.
1 he phalanges of all digits are roughly thè same shape: prox-
imally expanded, narrow shaft, and distai condyle with two
condylar heads. The tenninal phalanx or ungual is a well-
defined claw with a proximal and ventral tubercle.
Pelvic girdle and rearlimb
The right pelvic girdle is not exposed (Fig. 8 A).
However, thè left girdle is more complete and reasonably
well preserved. The left pubis is well preserved as is thè
left ischium; thè left ilium is preserved throughout most
of its posterior length as a naturai mold of thè ventral por-
tion of thè bone within only thè acetabular portion pre¬
served as a fragment of bone.
Ilium
The ilium of Pontosaurus kornhuberi is slightly
expanded at thè contact with thè ischium and pubis; pos¬
terior to thè acetabular fossa (not well preserved in its
entirety in MSNM 3662) thè ilium is posteri orly elongate
(i.e., thè posterior superior iliac crest), articulates with
two sacrai processes and overlaps at least one pygal ver¬
tebra, possibly two (Fig. 1 1 A-C). There is no evidence of
an anterior superior iliac crest, as thè bone appears to ter¬
minate at thè contact with thè pubis in thè middle of thè
acetabular fossa. This same anatomy (posterior iliac crest,
no anterior crest) is shared with all aigialosaurs (Caldwell
et al., 1995) and Dolichosaurus longicollis (Caldwell,
2000) and contrasts with thè anteriorly directed superior
iliac crest/spine of mosasaurs (Russell, 1967) and thè
condition in modern terrestrial lizards where both crests
are present (though thè anterior is smaller, e.g., Varanus ).
Pubis
The pubis is small as compared to extant terrestrial
lizards, but stili displays thè typical hatchet-shaped mor-
phology; there is a large pubic foramen at thè center of
thè proximal head of thè bone (Fig. 1 1 A-B). Distai to thè
pubic head, thè element narrows to a long medially direct¬
ed shaft that expands slightly where it contacts thè right
pubis at thè midiine. The head of thè pubis bears two prin-
cipal facets: 1) laterally for thè head of thè femur, 2)
medially, for articulation with thè ilium. The ischiadic
facet is not visible as preserved and prepared.
Ischium
The ischium is slightly shorter than thè pubis and has
been displaced from its ventral and posterior position (Fig.
1 1 A-B). The element is curved along its anterior margin
and steeply angled along its posterior margin to form an
equine-ankle like shape. The proximal portion is narrower
than thè distai tip (ischiadic footplate), thè latter of which
articulates with thè opposite footplate of thè right ischium.
Femur
The femur is a long (33 mm long) and relatively robust
bone (Fig. 12 A) that is nearly twice thè length of thè
epipodium (tibia and fibula are each 18 mm in length). As
compared to thè humerus (16.5 mm long) it is twice thè
length of that bone, and compared to thè ratio of nearly 1 : 1
between thè humerus and radius/ulna, thè femoral/tibia-
fibula ratio is quite different at roughly 1.8:1.
The proximal tip of thè left femur preserves a rounded
epiphysis stili in articulation with thè acetabular fossa (Figs.
1 1 A-B, 12 A). The proximal portion of thè element is rela-
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
25
Fig. 1 1 - Pelvic girdle of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) Photodetail of left pelvis; B) line drawing of same; C) photo detail of pygal
region. Abbreviations: cl-2, first and second caudal vertebrae; ep, epiphysis; fe, femur; hl-2, haemal arches; il, ilium; isc, ischium; pu, pubis; pyg 1,
1“ pygal vertebra; pyg 2, 2nd pygal vertebra; spi -2, sacrai processes 1 and 2.
26
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
tively narrow compared to thè expanded distai portion.
There are no strongly developed trochanters on thè proximal
head, nor are there any well developed femoral condyles at
thè articulation with thè tibia and fibula. The only relatively
well-developed feature visible on both thè right and left
fernora is a slight anterior curvature of thè shaft of thè bone.
The surface bone of thè right femur is better preserved than
thè left and indicates that thè mid-line of thè shaft bears a
long proximal-distal crest, postaxial to which is an equally
long and shallow fossa. It is likely that this portion of thè
femur served as thè insertion point for thè m. caud-
ofemoralis discussed previously in terms of thè pygal and
anterior caudal vertebrae and their transverse processes.
Tibia and fibula
The tibia and fibula, like thè radius and ulna, are of
similar size and are distally divergent along their contact
with thè proximal tarsal row (Fig. 12 A-C); proximal ly thè
two elements are in dose contact along thè distai margin
of thè femur. The effect of this distai divergence is that thè
antebrachium, and thus lower limb, is wide and fiat as
noted previously for thè forelimb (Fig. 10 A-E) and in
mosasaurs and other dolichosaurs. In Pontosaurus korn-
huberi thè tibia is a simple rod-like element that is slight-
ly curved along its antebrachial margin and is much more
gracile than thè fibula. The fibula is much more narrow at
its proximal end than thè distai end (2:1 ratio) that
expands into a large fan-shape distally. The fibula articu-
lates with both thè calcaneum and astragalus.
Mesopodium (tarsus)
The tarsus possesses both a proximal and distai row of
tarsals (Fig. 12 A-C) and is thè best-preserved tarsus of
any known member of thè Dolichosauridae, sensu this
study (see also Caldwell, 1999a, 2000; Lee & Caldwell,
2000). The proximal row includes thè postaxially located
calcaneum, thè astragalus, situated in thè antebrachial
space, and an extra element identified in Fig. 12 B-C with
a “?”. This extra element is common to both thè right and
left pes and is in articulation in thè left pes where it is
located ventral to thè tibia and preaxial to thè astragalus;
in thè right pes this element has been disarticulated into
thè antebrachial space by thè distai movement of thè tibia
(Fig. 12 A-C). The identity of this extra element is prob-
lematic. In thè left pes it would be easy to dismiss this
bone as a tibial epiphysis. However, in thè right pes, this
is clearly not thè case. Instead, thè possibility is raised
that this preaxial element is a separate center of astragalar
cartilage ossification, or, that it is a distai tarsal two that
has been displaced.
The morphology of thè astragalus is similar to that
known for pythonomorphs (see Caldwell, 1996, fig. 15)
where thè element is not fused to thè calcaneum as in mod-
ern squamates, but instead is a large element, dominating
thè proximal tarsal row, bears a “u”-shaped emargination of
finished periehondral bone across thè distai expanse of thè
antebrachium, and has a distinct tibial and fibular facet of
roughly equal size and articulates with a small, lozenge-
shaped to irregularly shaped calcaneum (Fig. 12 A-C).
The distai tarsal row includes only two elements, distai
tarsal three and four (Fig. 12 A-C). Distai tarsal four is thè
larger of thè two as preserved in thè right pes (Fig. 1 2 A, C)
and articulates preaxially with thè smaller distai tarsal
three. However, postaxially distai tarsal four also appears to
be in contact with a bony mass of uncertain identity (Fig.
12 A-C). In comparison, in thè left pes, distai tarsal four is
again well preserved, but distai tarsal three is not preserved
or is preserved unprepared below thè tip of metatarsal
three, such that this articulation is not obvious. However,
there is a distinct ossification postaxial to distai tarsal four
that may be thè same element as indicated in thè right pes.
In mosasaurs thè tarsus only ever includes a small calca¬
neum, large astragalus and distai tarsal four (Caldwell,
1996). In aigialosaurs (Caldwell et al., 1995) thè tarsus
includes a small calcaneum, large astragalus and distai
tarsals three and four. The tarsus of Pontosaurus kornhuberi
shares thè presence of an ossified third tarsal with
aigialosaurs to exclusion of this element in mosasaurs.
The additional postaxial element may well be thè poor-
ly ossified portion of thè hook on thè fifth metatarsal or it
may represent thè actual fifth metatarsal with thè element
so identified in Pontosaurus kornhuberi being thè first pha-
lanx (Fig. 12 A-C). If this is thè case, then this anatomy
would be consistent with that seen in mosasaurids
(Caldwell, 1996) where thè hooked fifth metatarsal, a usu-
ally consistent feature of squamates, is absent, but there thè
fifth metatarsal is a small, compressed element that articu¬
lates distally with a first phalanx that is of subequal size
and shape to thè other metatarsals.
Metapodium
Five metatarsals are identified with thè caveat as identi¬
fied previously, i.e., that thè actual fifth metatarsal might be
thè element identified with a “?”-mark in Fig. 12 A-C.
However, using thè identities as illustrateci, in thè manus,
thè first and fifth are shorter than two, three and four, and
as a result are more hourglass-shaped than thè longer and
slimmer metatarsals two through four. An important differ-
ence is that thè fifth is shorter than thè first and is much
less robust while thè first is thè thickest and most robust
element in thè pes. Due to some slight disarticulation and
dissociation, thè articulations of thè metatarsals with thè
more proximal elements of thè tarsus are not clear.
Phalanges
The phalangeal formula appears to be 2-3-4-5-3 thus
showing a limited form of phalangeal reduction of thè fifth
digit by loss of one phalanx (Fig. 12 A-C) unless thè argu-
ment rendered previously is accurate and thè fifth metatarsal
is represented by thè broken fragments in Fig. 12 A-C. If this
is thè case, then thè phalangeal formula is not derived, but
rather is thè primitive configuration of 2-3-4-5-4.
The phalanges of thè pes are morphologically similar
to those of thè manus: proximal expansion, narrowed
shaft, and distai condyle with two condylar heads. Again,
thè terminal phalanx or linguai is a well-defined claw
with a proximal and ventral tubercle for ligamentous
attachment and a sharp tip.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
27
B
Fig. 12 - Rearlimbs of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) OverView of rearlimbs, pelvis, and anterior cauda; B) line drawing of left rearlimb;
C) line drawing of right rearlimb. Abbreviations: a, astragalus; ca, calcaneum; dt3, distai tarsal 3; dt4, distai tarsal 4; fi, fibula; ti, tibia; i-v, metatar-
sals 1 to 5; ?, anterior astragalar ossification.
28
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
SQUAMATION AND TRACHEAL RINGS
Caldwell & Dal Sasso (2004) recently described thè
squamation of Pontosaurus kornhuberi and compared it to
thè scales of a number of extant squamates. In association
with thè osteological description presented here, I present a
summary of Caldwell & Dal Sasso’s (2004) descriptions as
well as additional details not given by those authors.
Squamation
Most of thè scales of MSNM V3662 are preserved as
articulated sections of orange to brown permineralized or
perhaps carbonized integumentary remnants (Figs. 2, 7,
8, 11-15), while some sections such as those on thè cheek,
appear to be external casts. Scales range in size from
small head scales (1-2 mm) with irregular polygonal out-
lines (Figs. 2, 13), to regularly organized networks of
large diamond-shaped scales on thè neck, body,
hindlimbs, and tail (Figs. 7, 8, 1 1, 12, 14, 15); these latter
scales appear to be very well imbricated or overlapping.
A number of features separate thè various scale
regions from each other. The head scales all appear to be
non-overlapping structures while all thè body scale
regions, from thè neck to thè tip of thè tail are imbricat¬
ed. The transition from non-overlapping to overlapping is
abrupt and appears to occur immediately posterior to thè
presumed location of either an external auditory meatus
(Fig. 1 3 A-C), marked here by thè posterior margin of thè
quadrate. In thè cheek to gular region, thè gular or neck
scales are diamond-shaped while thè cheek scales are
polygonal and non-overlapping.
The balance of thè body margin of MSNM V3662 is
well defined by thè squamation (Figs. 8, 14, 15). Where
preserved, there are large, articulated patches of scales in
particular along thè posterior half of thè specimen and
down to thè tip of tail (Figs. 1 A-B; 8, 11, 12, 14, 15). In
thè mid-trunk region, thè body margin scales are not well
preserved, likely due to preparation of thè specimen
before thè recognition that scales were present. However,
in some body regions, for example thè tail, thè preserved
integumentary margins indicate very clearly that thè
dorsoventral expansion of thè tail is twice as deep as thè
skeletal outline (Figs. 1 B, 8, 15).
The head scales include cheek and jaw scales and pos-
sibly a short section of labial scales. Labial scales are locat-
ed near thè jugal and are preserved as a sequence of small,
subrectangular scales, each of which bears a tiny protuber-
ance or tubercle at its center (Fig. 13 A, C-D). Cheek and
jaw scales vary in size and are elliptical to hexagonal in out¬
line (1 ig. 13 A, C-D); these scales compare well with those
of thè monitor lizard, Varanus niloticus but not with those
of thè Yellow-bellied Sea Snake, Pelamis platurus (see
Caldwell & Dal Sasso, 2004). Neck scales in MSNM
V3662 (Fig. 13 A-B) are small, diamond-shaped, overlap¬
ping, and arranged in oblique rows; neck through to tail
scales for both V. niloticus and P. platurus are markedly
difierent (see Caldwell & Dal Sasso, 2004).
I he body scales of MSNM V3662 are uniformly sized.
diamond-shaped scales that are arranged in oblique rows
(Figs. 8, 14, 15). Comparisons to other fossil pythono-
morphs with scales show similarities to those of thè fossil
mosasaur Tylosaurus proriger (Snow, 1878) and thè fossil
aigialosaur Carsosaurus marchesetti (Caldwell & Lee,
2001). Comparisons to extant squamates show marked sim¬
ilarities to many terrestrial alethinophidian snakes as well as
aquatic alethinophidians such as thè Banded Sea Krait,
Laticauda colubrina (UAMZ 762).
Caudal scale morphology differs from body scale mor-
phology in thè hypaxial region of thè tail, whereas epaxial
caudal scales are comparable in size and organization to thè
body scales (Figs. 8 C-F, 15 D-E). In MSNM V3662, imme¬
diately below thè caudal vertebrae, and on top of and below
thè haemal spines, there are two to three horizontal rows of
scales, each of which bears a “keel” (Fig. 15 D-E); thè keels
on these caudal scales compare well with thè keels of thè
body scales of Tylosaurus proriger. Immediately below thè
keeled tail scales of MSNM V3662 is a single row of tali,
overlapping, columnar scales that extend to thè ventral mar¬
gin of thè tail. It appears as though these large ventral-most
scales (Fig. 15 D-E) were bilaterally paired, though this
cannot be positively determined. It is also a possibility,
though less likely, that these ventral columnar scales were
large, single scales that crossed thè ventral caudal midiine.
The hypaxial caudal scales of MSNM V3662 are similar to
those of Laticauda colubrina that possesses two or three
rows of hexagonal scales (though in Laticauda they do not
bear a keel), and a single row of bilaterally paired columnar
scales that meet at thè ventral midiine, similar to
Pontosaurus kornhuberi.
The scales of MSNM V3662 appear to be a blend of thè
scale types present in extant lizards and snakes. As was dis-
cussed by Caldwell & Dal Sasso (2004), small, irregular,
non-imbricated head scales associated with small labial
scales are observed in iguanids, chamaeleonids, agamids,
gekkotans, and varanids, and in acrochordid snakes; in con-
trast to MSNM V3662, several other squamates, i.e., some
iguanids and some snakes (e.g., boas, vipers) combine
irregular, non-imbricated head scales with large labial
scales. The remaining lizards and most snakes, with thè
exception of scolecophidians, have large scales on thè head
and labial margins, which in some are imbricated, but in
many are not. The tiny protuberance in thè middle of thè
labial scales appears to be unique to Pontosaurus.
Scales on posterior body parts of MSNM V3662 are
similar to thè imbricated scales of many scincids and
iguanids; trunk scales are similar to those of many extant
snakes with thè exception of scolecophidians and some
marine elapids (e.g., Pelamis platurus). Interestingly, thè
amphibious seakrait has scales similar to those of terres¬
trial snakes, mosasaurs, aigialosaurs, and MSNM V3662.
In contrast, body scales of MSNM V3662 are very differ-
ent from those of extant varanoids such as Varanus,
Heloderma , and Lanthanotus.
ttk/.'
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
29
Fig. 13 - Scales on thè head and neck region of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) Reconstruction of thè head (artisti Fabio Fogliazza); B)
detail of neck scales; C) detail of cheek scales; D) detail of lower portion of jugal bar illustrating possible labial scales.
30
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
I ig. 14 - Scales on thè trunk ot Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) Detail of scales at mid-trunk, vertebrae 17-21; B) photo of mid-trunk
region. ‘A’ is a magnified portion of thè upper part of photo ‘B’.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
31
Fig. 15 - Pelvic and caudal scales of Pontosaurus kornhuberi, MSNM V3662. A) OverView of rearlimbs, pelvis, and anterior cauda; B) photo detail of
anteriormost and ventral caudal scales; C) line drawing of photo ‘B’; D) photo detail of midcaudal scales and ventral columnar scales; E) line draw-
ìng of photo ‘D\
32
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
Tracheal and ?bronchial? rings
The trachea, as represented by thè preserved tracheal
rings present in thè cervical region and thè anteriormost
portion of thè trunk, was naturally long, but also had a
rather large diameter (Fig. 16) at approximately 3-4 mm.
The preserved tracheal rings are exposed to thè right of
thè axis cervical vertebra (Fig. 7 A-C) and are exposed on
thè right side of thè specimen through to C5 where they
disappear under C6-7 reappearing at C8 and Crossing thè
internai surface of thè clavicle-interclavicle (though not
well preserved here) to reappear between thè left side ribs
of thè first, second and third dorsal vertebrae (Fig. 9). At
this point, it is tempting to refer to these rings as pre¬
served portions of thè left bronchus since presumably at
this point, thè trachea had bifurcated into thè right and left
bronchi. This series of tracheal and perhaps bronchial
rings is thè best-preserved and most continuous sequence
for any known pythonomorph and possibly any lepi-
dosauromorph.
Fig. 16 - Tracheal rings of Pontosaunis kornhuberi, MSNM V3662.
PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS
Of thè squamate synapomorphies recognized by Estes
et al. (1988), Pontosaurus kornhuberi possesses thè fol-
lowing: reduced nasals, transverse frontoparietal suture,
angular not reaching mandibular condyle, single headed
ribs, cervical intercentra form prominent hypapophyses,
loss of entepicondylar foramen in humerus, enlarged dis¬
tai epiphysis of ulna, loss of gastralia, proatlas absent,
premaxillae fused, parietal fused, jugal forms anteroven-
tral border of orbit, procoelous vertebrae, dorsal inter¬
centra lost, and an anterior coracoid emargination. As a
result, it is accepted a priori that it is a squamate, a state¬
ment that need not be tested phylogenetically.
Additionally, Pontosaurus kornhuberi also possesses
thè following anguimorph synapomorphies as recognized
by Estes et al. (1988): cervical intercentra sutured to pos-
terior part of preceding centrum and more than 26 pre¬
sacrai vertebrae.
Methodology
Phylogenetic relationships of Pontosaurus kornhuberi
and Pontosaurus lesinensis were examined by integrating
thè detailed osteological description presented here into a
highly modified version of Pierce & Caldwell’s (2004) data
matrix (characters and state codings) of pythonomorph
squamates (a modified analysis of Lee & Caldwell’s [2000]
squamate data matrix). A large number of characters were
uninformative when balanced against thè reduced ingroup
used here and so were deleted. Several character States were
modified, in particular for Pontosaurus lesinensis, and
some character descriptions were also modified.
The analysis presented here only includes thè ingroup
pythonomorphs as identified by Pierce & Caldwell
(2004): aigialosaurs and mosasaurs (Lee & Caldwell, 2000),
Pachyrhachis problematicus (Lee & Caldwell, 1998),
Pachyophis woodwardi (Lee et al., 1999), Aphanizocnemus
libanensis (Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1997), thè Dolichosauridae
[which includes Dolichosaurus longicollis and Coniasaurus
crassidens/Coniasaurus gracilodens (Caldwell 1999,
2000; Caldwell & Cooper, 1999)], Adriosaurus suessi
(Lee & Caldwell, 2000), Pontosaurus lesinensis (Pierce &
Caldwell, 2004), and Pontosaurus kornhuberi (this
study). These taxa were coded for 77 osteological charac¬
ters (Appendix I) modified from thè character descrip¬
tions listed by Pierce & Caldwell (2004). Cladograms
were produced using thè Branch-and-Bound algorithm as
written into thè computer software application PAUP
Version 4.0bl0 (Swofford, 2002). All characters were
analyzed unordered and unweighted; terminal polymor-
phisms were interpreted as “uncertainty regarding thè
primitive state” when calculating tree lengths. The mod¬
era varanid lizard Varanus sp. was coded for these same
77 characters and used as thè outgroup taxon for rooting
thè tree and polarizing character state transformations.
The selection of Varanus as outgroup in this analysis fol-
lows thè justifications as given by Tchernov et al. (2000)
in their analysis of snakes, and thè findings of Rieppel &
Zaher (2000) regarding varanid-mosasaurid relationships
as presented in their critique of Lee (1998).
Results
Cladistic analysis of thè data matrix (Appendix II)
resulted in 9 equally most-parimonious cladograms with
tree lengths of 119 steps, Consistency Indices (C.I.) of
0.773, Homoplasy Indices (H.I.) of 0.226, and a Retention
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
33
Indices (R.I.) of 0.727. Aigialosaurs and mosasaurs forni a
resolved clade in all nine cladograms as do thè ophidians,
Adriosaurus and thè two pontosaurs; thè Dolichosauridae
are consistently reconstructed as thè sistergroup to all other
non-mosasauroid pythonomorphs (see thè Strict Consensus
Tree, Fig. 1 7 A). The unstable taxon is thè Lebanese marine
lizard, Aphanizocnemus libanensis. In three trees it is thè
sistergroup to all non-mosasauroid pythonomorphs, in
three more it forms a clade with thè Dolichosauridae, and
in thè final three it is resolved as thè sistergroup to all pon¬
tosaurs, Adriosaurus and ophidians.
Fig. 17 - A) Strict consensus phylogeny and B) Cladogram Number One, resulting from cladistic analysis of ten pythonomorph squamate taxa using
77 osteological characters. This analysis resulting in nine most parsimonius trees (Tree length, 1 19 steps; Consistency Index (C.l.= 0.773); Homoplasy
Index (H.I. = 0.226); Retention Index (R.I. = 0.727).
34
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
Character distributions
The synapomorphies supporting thè various clades are
thè only important components of any phylogenetic state¬
ment as derived from a cladogram, or series of cladograms
(i.e., a consensus tree interpreted as a phylogeny). As clado¬
grams are constructed by character state distributions, thè
nature of thè characters and States as described, and subjec-
tive decisions that were made in their delineation and con-
struction, are thè key elements of any phylogenetic hypothe-
sis. Statistical support, other than thè information supplied
by consistency and homoplasy indices, is not given in this
study. From my point of view, a character may well be homo-
plastically distributed and not at all “robusf ' on a statistical
basis. However, this lack of robustness may stem from at
least two altematives in terms of phylogenetic history or non-
history: 1) thè taxic sample is incomplete but thè character is
accurately described; 2) thè character is inaccurately
described and thè taxic sample is incomplete. In either case,
because we are testing sistergroup relations, not heuristically
recovering ancestors, we must always assume that thè taxic
sample is incomplete. What is likely impossible to determine
is thè delineation and character state subdivision of thè fea-
ture being characterized. No statistical test, administered
subsequent to thè cladistic parsimony analysis, can deter¬
mine thè phylogenetic value of a character statement. In
other words, I do not accept thè value of decay indices such
as Bremer Support etc., and have not applied such tests to thè
analysis of character distributions, thè characters of which,
and their States, are stili thè object of great scrutiny.
The following review of synapomorphy/apomorphy
distributions reflects thè character distributions for clado¬
gram number one (Fig. 17 B).
(Aigialosauridae, Mosasauridae) - This clade is sup-
ported by six synapomorphies: 6 (0=>1), Jugal extends
anteriorly past orbit; 48 (0->l), Coronoid anteromedial
margin does not contact splenial; 49 (0=>1), Surangular
forms half of articular cotyle (1); 60 (0=>1), Transverse
processes of cervicals on middle of centrum; 61 (0=>2),
Cervical intercentra (excluding atlas and axis intercentra)
not sutured or fused to preceding centrum; 72 (1=>2),
Number of rib attachment points to sternum, five pairs.
{Dolichosauridae, { Aplianizocnemus {{ Pontosaurus
lesinensis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi) {Adriosaurus
( Pachyophis ( Pachyrhachis , Serpentes)))))) - This clade is
supported by 17 synapomorphies: 1 (l->0), Premaxillary
lateral foramina absent; 20 (0-> 1 ), Supratemporal in super-
ficial position, on dorsolateral surface of parietal; 27 (l->2),
Decensus parietalis, prominent flanges forni sidewall of
braincase contacting entire dorsal margin of prootic; 29 (0-
>1), Optic foramina enclosed partly or entirely by frontals;
30 (0-> 1 ), Trigeminal foramen or foramina, anterior margin
enclosed by descending flange of parietal; 31 (0->l), Crista
prootica (ridge on lateral surface of thè prootic, overhanging
foramen prò nervi facialis) reduced to weak ridge, or absent;
32 (l->0), Basisphenoid without long posterolateral flanges;
33 (0->l), Supraoccipital situated posterior to parietal,
forms part of posterior skull roof; 34 (0->l ), Post-temporal
fenestra completely closed via suturai contact of thè skull
roof and otic region of braincase; 35 (l->2), Opening of
Jacobson’s organ enclosed fully by vomer and septomaxilla
only, not confluent with choana; 38 (l->0). Palatine as long
as vomer; 39 (0->l), Palatine with distinct rectangular
process projecting medially from thè middle portion of thè
palatine to thè skull midiine; 59 (0->l), Number of cervical
vertebrae ten to eleven; 66 (0=>1), Scapulocoracoid present
but reduced; 69 (0-> 1 ), Interclavicle present but reduced; 73
(0=>1), Forelimbs small (1); 76 (0->l), Scierai ossicles thir-
teen or fewer.
( Aphanizocnemus (( Pontosaurus lesinensis, Pontosaurus
kornhuberi) { Adriosaurus {Pachyophis (Pachyrhachis,
Serpentes))))) - This clade is supported by 6 synapomor¬
phies: 2 (0->l), Premaxilla-maxilla contact mobile and
non-sutural; 12 (0->l), Frontoparietal suture, in dorsal
view, complex curved or interdigitating contact; 26 (0->2),
Ventromedial processes of frontals contacting paraba-
sisphenoid below olfactory tracts; 42 (0->l), Mental foram¬
ina on lateral surface of dentary, two or fewer foramina; 44
( 1 ->0), Subdentai shelf weakly developed; 71 (0->l),
Ossified sternum absent.
{{Pontosaurus lesinensis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi)
{{Adriosaurus {Pachyophis (Pachyrhachis, Serpentes)))) -
This clade is supported by 3 synapomorphies: 46 (0->l),
Splenial, small, only reaching middle of tooth row (1); 62
(0=>1), Pachyostosis of mid-dorsal vertebrae and ribs,
present; 63 (0=>1), ribs, long, not curved, body laterally
compressed.
{Adriosaurus {Pachyophis (Pachyrhachis, Serpentes)))
- This clade is supported by 1 7 synapomorphies: 4 ( 1 ->0),
Posterior process of maxilla long, reaching or extending past
middle of ventral margin of orbit; 8 (l->0), Antorbital ridge
absent; 9 (0=>1), Frontals, paired elements; 15 (0=>1),
Postorbitai ventral process prominent, forming half or more
of posterior orbitai margin, postorbitai primarily an orbitai
bone; 23 (0->2), Quadrate, distinct tympanic crest absent and
extemal surface of quadrate only weakly concave; 24 ( 1 ->0),
Quadrate shape without large, posteroventrally curved,
suprastapedial process; 28 (0->l), decensus parietalis con¬
tacting parabasisphenoid; 36 (0->l), Vomer entirely mediai
to palatine; 37 (0->l), Palatine-vomer contact mobile, non-
sutural contact; 40 (l->0), Interpterygoid vacuity (“pyriform
recess” of Estes et al, 1988) open and wide; 44 (0->2),
Subdentai shelf absent; 45 ( 1 ->2), Posterior margin of later¬
al surface of dentary, deep notch present; 48 (0->l),
Coronoid anteromedial margin does not contact splenial; 51
(l->2), Articular fused with prearticular and surangular; 55
(0->l), Palatine teeth present; 68 (0->l), Clavicle absent; 75
(0-> 1 ), Scierai ossicles absent.
(Pachyophis (Pachyrhachis, Serpentes)) - This clade
is supported by 14 synapomorphies: 5 (0=>1), Lacrimai
absent, never present as a discrete element; 10 (0->l),
Frontal excluded from orbitai margin, prefrontal contacts
postfrontal or postorbitai; 17 (0=>1), Pineal foramen
absent; 18 (0=>2), Parietal table and jaw adductor mus-
cles, parietal table has a narrow sagittal crest, jaw adduc-
tors extend over entire dorsal surface of parietal; 19
(0=>1 ), Upper temporal arch incomplete, upper and lower
temporal fenestra confluent; 52 (0->l), Retroarticular
process size short, < articular cotyle; 57 (0-> 1 ), Vertebral
articulatory surfaces vertical, condyles (if present) facing
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
35
posteriorly, much of thè articulatory surface is visible in
ventral view; 58 (0=>3), Number of presacrai vertebrae
120 or more; 59 (1=>2), Number of cervical vertebrae
more than twelve; 64 (0=>1), Distally forked cloacal ribs
(“lymphapophyses”) present; 66 ( 1=>2), Scapulocoracoid
absent; 73 (1=>2), Forelimbs absent; 74 (l->0),
Epipodials parallel; 77 (0=>1), Epiphyses on appendicu-
lar skeleton absent.
{Pontosaurus lesinensis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi) -
This clade is supported by 10 synapomorphies: 3 (1=>0),
Dorsal process of maxilla on middle or anterior end of max-
illa; 21 (1=>0), Supratemporal small, less than half thè max¬
imum width of thè skull; 22 (l->0), Quadrate suspension,
mobile, articulates dorsally with squamosal, supratemporal
and opisthotic; 41 (l->0), Pterygoid, anterior (palatine)
process merges gradually, in a gentle curve, with thè lateral
(ectopterygoid) process; 50 (l->0), Adductor fossa faces
dorsomedially; 52 (0=>2), Retroarticular process size long,
>2 times articular cotyle; 61 (0=>1), Cervical intercentra
(excluding atlas and axis intercentra) sutured to preceding
centrum (1); 65 (0->l), very laterally compresseci, trans¬
verse processes reduced anteriorly, absent posteriorly,
chevrons and neural spines elongated; 69 (l->0), interclavi-
cle present.
Discussion
The phylogenetic analysis presented here supports
Nopcsa’s (1903) claim that Pontosaurus is more closely
related to other dolichosaurs and snakes than to thè
aigialosaurs (Kramberger, 1892); thè varanoid question
debated by Kornhuber (1873) and Kramberger (1892)
was not tested here. The phylogenetic position of
Pontosaurus further reinforces thè assertion that
dolichosaurs are thè sister group to all modem and extinct
snakes as recently suggested by Pierce & Caldwell (2004)
and Lee & Caldwell (2000), and more historically, by
Nopcsa (1908, 1923).
As was argued by Pierce & Caldwell (2004), thè analy¬
sis presented here also supports thè idea that thè family
Dolichosauridae is a paraphyletic assemblage as indicated
by thè following sistergroup structure from Cladogram 1
[( Dolichosaurus , { Aphanizocnemus {{Pontosaurus lesinen¬
sis, Pontosaurus kornhuberi) {Adriosaurus {Pachyophis
(Pachyrhachis, Serpentes))))))] (Fig. 17 B).
It should be noted however, that thè paraphyly of
Nopcsa’s Dolichosauridae, inclusive of “dolichosaurs”
other than Dolichosaurus and Coniasaurus, could be a con-
sequence of thè taxa and/or characters used in this analysis;
alternatively, if arguments presented by Rieppel & Zaher
(2000) are ever tested by originai analysis then it is possi-
ble thè topology hypothesized here will be found to be
polyphyletic and that thè Dolichosauridae is in fact a mono-
phyletic assemblage exclusive of snakes. As noted, Rieppel
& Zaher’s (2000) contention has not yet been corroborated
by thè presentation of a testable hypothesis.
In terms of thè selection of taxa and characters, it is
important to point out that there are nine known species
of non-mosasaurid and non-aigialosaur Cenomanian-
aged marine squamates that are referred to as
“dolichosaurs”; however, only five were incorporated into
thè above analysis. A detailed re-examination of all
known dolichosaurs, such as Acteosaurus tommasinii
(Meyer, 1860) and Eidolosaurus trauthi (Nopcsa, 1923),
is necessary in order to complete thè data set.
For example, recent re-assessment of Acteosaurus cras-
sicostatus by Caldwell & Lee (2004) indicated that thè
taxon is not diagnosable and that thè specimens assigned to
thè species by Calligaris (1993) are diagnosable as
Adriosaurus suessi. Attempts to code E. trauthi resulted in
only 18% of thè 159 characters being coded; thè characters
and thè taxon were removed from thè final matrix due to
thè inordinately high amount of missing data.
What is ultimately needed is a detailed examination
and test of thè monophyly of thè Pythonomorpha
(mosasaurs, aigialosaurs, dolichosaur, pontosaurs,
adriosaurs, acteosaurs, and snakes). Rieppel & Zaher
(2000) recently re-examined and criticized Lee’s (1998)
character evidence as used in support of thè hypothesis of
a monophyletic Pythonomorpha. Their analysis found
pythonomorphs to be non-monophyletic, with thè
Mosasauroidea nested within varanoids and snakes nest-
ed with a clade including amphisbaenids and dibamids;
all of these squamates were found to be anguimorphs.
Although Rieppel & Zaher (2000) used thè results of their
analysis to reject Lee’s (1998) assertion of a monophylet¬
ic Pythonomorpha, they did not accept their own phylo¬
genetic tree as an accurate representation of squamate
relationships; this makes their “falsification” unaccept-
able. A criticai review of thè character codings used in
this study and those employed by Rieppel & Zaher (2000)
along with an additional analysis including all known
pythonomorphs is necessary to resolve thè monophyly of
thè Pythonomorpha. A rigorous analysis of mosasaurs,
aigialosaurs, dolichosaurs, pachyophiids, and snakes
might alter both our understanding of pythonomorph phy-
logeny and by extension snake origins.
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY
Aquatic environments present very specific physical
and environmental constraints on thè successful adapta-
tion and evolution of thè inhabitant organisms. For sec¬
ondari^ aquatic tetrapods thè parameters of these con¬
straints influence anatomies related to buoyancy control,
respiration, locomotion, vision, hearing, chemosensory
perception, feeding, and reproduction (PI. 1).
For example, extinct aquatic squamates responded to
these constraints and thè selection pressures imposed by
them, through thè evolution of pachyostosis in thè ribs and
vertebrae in order to solve problems of buoyancy. In some
groups, such as dolichosaurs, they evolved elongate necks
and snouts to address thè constraints of ambush feeding
underwater. Mosasaurs solved locomotory problems in a
36
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
viscous fluid via modifications to thè axial skeleton to sup-
port carangiform locomotion, and by modifying thè limbs
into hydrofoils/paddles by shortening thè upper and lower
limb, and lengthening and broadening thè hand and foot.
Similar evolutionary Solutions to these physical and
environmental constraints are preserved in thè fossilized
skeletons of early aquatic snakes (Caldwell & Lee, 1997;
Rage & Escuillié, 2000; Tchernov et al., 2000; Rieppel &
Head, 2005), dolichosaurs (Caldwell, 1999, 2000;
Caldwell & Cooper, 1999; Lee & Caldwell, 2000) (e.g.,
MSNM V3662), aigialosaurs (DeBraga & Carroll, 1993;
Caldwell & Lee, 2001), and in particular, thè giant marine
mosasaurs (Russell, 1967; Bell, 1997).
Pontosaurus
The anatomy and morphology of thè complete tail of
Pontosaurus komhuberi, as exemplified by MSNM V3662,
with 1 63 vertebrae comprising 68% of thè total body length
(TBL), suggests that this structure was thè primary propul¬
sive organ for aquatic locomotion (Fig. 1 8 A). Because pon-
tosaurs and dolichosaurs are among thè earliest known
aquatically adapted lizards (Komhuber, 1873; Pierce &
Caldwell, 2004) along with pachyophiid snakes (Lee &
Caldwell, 1998), and have been hypothesized to be thè sister-
group to snakes (Lee & Caldwell, 2000), thè adaptations of
pontosaurs and dolichosaurs provide important insights into
aquatic evolution and adaptation in early marine squamates.
A useful comparison of body proportions gives some
insight into thè functional morphology of Pontosaurus.
Caldwell & Dal Sasso (2004) compared Pontosaurus
komhuberi to two modern, aquatic squamates, thè
Galapagos Marine Iguana and thè Yellow-bellied Sea
Snake (Fig. 1 8 A-C). Those authors showed that thè tail of
Pontosaurus is proportionately longer, and is dorsoven-
trally deepened along most of its length as compared to
either a sea snake or thè marine iguana. This is an impor¬
tant distinction as it indicates that seasnakes locomote not
with their tail (carangiform locomotion) but with their
entire bodies (anguilliform locomotion); by comparison,
thè marine iguana, which swims in a carangiform-sub-
carangiform mode, does so with a proportionately short-
er tail. Another level of comparison can be made between
pontosaurs and mosasaurs in thè percent total body length
(TBL) of thè tail, which ranges between 30% and 48% in
thè latter (Russell, 1967). In other words, pontosaurs had
very short bodies, long necks, and extremely long tails as
compared to thè more derived mosasaurs, to their sister
group, thè snakes, and to thè modern marine iguana.
Comparing thè osteology of thè tail of a marine igua¬
na with thè tail of Pontosaurus komhuberi , it is evident
that thè latter is much more laterally compressed; com¬
parison with thè sea snake indicates a similar degree of
compression to pontosaurs. The anterior-most haemal
arches and transverse processes of MSNM V3662 present
a broad and deepened set of surfaces for thè insertion of
a large and powerful caudofemoralis musculature (lateral
to thè hypaxially oriented anterior haemals immediately
posterior to thè reduced ischium) that would have been
used to “drive” thè movements of thè tail. The adaptive
importance of thè tail as thè aquatic locomotory organ for
Cretaceous marine squamates cannot be overemphasized;
even in later groups of marine lizards such as mosasaurs,
which evolved paddle-like limbs, thè primary locomotory
organ was clearly thè tail. A brief examination of caudal
osteology in mosasaurs highlights a number of features
shared with Pontosaurus komhuberi, but also reveals thè
presence of a large and variable number of pygal verte¬
brae (i.e., caudals without haemal arches).
The transverse processes of thè two pygal vertebrae
are very large and would have served as an enormous and
very long series of attachment sites for thè caud¬
ofemoralis musculature (ranging from 15-50% of total
tail length). Additionally, thè long pontosaur tail would
have been essential to tail-driven locomotion since thè
body was likely made more rigid by thè high degree of
pachyostosis. This rigidity may have decreased thè sever-
ity of lung compression, allowing limited respiration dur-
ing powerful surface locomotion.
A second feature of thè axial skeleton of Pontosaurus
komhuberi that is likely related to tail driven locomotion
is thè anatomy of thè ilium (Fig. 1 1), specifically thè iliac
crests. In P komhuberi thè only crest and process that is
well developed is thè posterior superior iliac crest, thus
giving a broad proximal attachment surface for thè
femoral flexors. There is no anterior extension of thè
ilium that would serve as thè proximal attachment site for
thè femoral extenders. The overdevelopment of thè poste¬
rior attachment sites, as compared to thè underdevelop-
ment of thè extensor attachments, may well represent a
functional focus on thè limb flexor musculature synergis-
tically associated with thè flexion of thè caudofemoralis.
Contractile flexion of thè caudofemoralis musculature
would adduct thè femora towards lateral surface of thè
tail. Synergistic flexion of thè femur and tibia, by contrac-
tion of thè femoral and tibial adductor musculature prox-
imally attached to thè posterior iliac crest {e.g., adductor
femoris, flexor tibialis internus and externus ), may well
have contributed to thè caudal powerstroke driven by con-
traction of thè caudofemoralis. Retraction of thè femur
would have been largely passive thus re-building elastic
kinetic energy into thè muscles of thè opposite and
stretched muscles fibers prior to thè next contraction.
This anatomy also suggests that thè synergistic power¬
stroke was rapid, strong and provided a burst of speed,
pursuits designed for ambush style predation.
Building on this functional model, thè anatomy of thè
pubis and ischium present a broad contact along thè ventral
aspect of midiine of thè body. This morphology indicates
that thè puboischiofemoralis and puboischiotibialis were all
well-developed in their proximal attachments. These mus¬
cles serve to pulì thè lower limb towards thè midiine of thè
body, again, likely in synergy with thè caudofemoralis',
again, retraction of thè femur and tibia would be passive
and occurring in opposing waves, right to left
For slow swimming, it seems reasonable to model
gentle caudal driven locomotion with thè limbs held tight-
ly against thè body. For high speed sudden power bursts,
thè functional model suggested here would likely involve
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
37
strong contractions, in opposite waves, where thè limbs
were strongly adducted and retracted, adducted and
retracted in a right-left pattern.
Following on thè use of thè rearlimbs in thè sudden
burst, tail driven locomotion, is thè aspect of that limb and
how it would have interacted with thè water. Both thè front
and rear limbs are extremely reduced in size in Pontosaurus
kornhuberi-, additionally, thè forelimb shows negative allo-
metric growth in relation to thè rearlimb. Some of this size
difference can be attributed to thè anatomy and inferred
function of thè rearlimb muscolature in locomotion as dis-
cussed previously. However, despite thè size and functional
difference between thè two limbs, they are similar to each
other in terms of their degree of flattening in thè lower limb
region, thè width of thè antebrachium, and thè elongation
and flattening of thè manus/pes (Figs. 10, 12). As discussed
previously, this flattening and thè widening of thè limb like-
ly prevented pronation of thè forelimb via rotation of thè
radius. This would effectively have limited thè ability of P.
kornhuberi to locomote efficiently in terrestrial environ-
ments using its limbs; there is no indication that this animai
could not have propelled itself effectively using axial loco¬
motion, similar to a modem legless lizard (e.g., Ophisaurus
apodus ) or a seakrait (e.g., Laticauda colubrina).
Similarities of body morphology and proportion link legless
lizards and P kornhuberi while thè ventral scales of P korn¬
huberi are similar to those of sea kraits (Caldwell & Dal
Sasso, 2004) which also are able to move about on land,
unlike tme sea snakes.
The other feature of limb morphology in Pontosaurus
kornhuberi that is important to consider, is thè hydrofoil
potential of a broad and flattened lower limb and manus/pes.
This is particularly important for thè rearlimb as functional-
ly reconstructed in thè caudal powerstroke. If thè limb was
passively retracted due to muscle fiber stretching in response
to total fiber recruitment during powerful contractions, then
it would have been efificient as a hydrofoil if it presented a
low hydrofoil aspect preaxially to postaxially. The widening
of thè antebrachium and flattening of thè elements supports
this functional model for thè rearlimb.
As a result of its small limbs, more rigid trunk, and
extremely long tail, it seems likely that Pontosaurus korn¬
huberi had reduced potential for terrestrial locomotion but
was likely an excellent swimmer, employing its unique
anatomies to problems of aquatic locomotion. It possessed
at least several rows of caudal scales that may have assist-
ed in reducing drag; later groups such as mosasaurs appear
to have covered thè entire body with keeled scales.
Pontosaurs also evolved incredibly long tails that were lat-
erally very compressed and thus presented a high surface
area for power strokes during lateral undulatory locomo¬
tion. Finally, thè anterior-most caudals show an osteology
that is very suggestive of thè presence of large caud-
ofemoralis muscles (a small number of pygals and thè pres¬
ence of large transverse processes); these muscles are criti¬
cai to tail-driven locomotion and became very important in
thè later, and very successali, giant mosasaurs.
cloaca
Fig. 18 - Body proportions of fossil and extant marine squamates. A) Pontosaurus kornhuberi , MSNMV3662; B) Amblyrhynchus cristatus, moderi!
Galapagos Marine Iguana; C) Pelamis platurus, modem Yellow-bellied Sea Snake.
Acknowledgements
I thank F. Fogliazza for thè exceptionally beautiful and
at times lyrical, color reconstructions. I also wish to
acknowledge both F. Fogliazza and D. Affer (MSNM) for
thè careful preparation of thè fossil. I extend my warmest
thanks to C. Dal Sasso for his continuai support and assis-
tance in overcoming thè intricacies of this project, and for
his support and friendship over thè many years I have been
working in collections in Milano. I also thank G. Teruzzi
for directing thè museum’s management of this project and
thè access to this specimen, and S. Nosotti for assistance in
editing and handling this monograph. I acknowledge finan-
cial support from NSERC Operating Grant #238458-01.
38
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
REFERENCES
Bell G. L., 1997 - A phylogenetic revision of North
American and Adriatic Mosasauroidea. In: Callaway J.
M. & Nicholls E. L. (eds.). Ancient Marine Reptiles.
Academic Press , San Diego: 293-332.
Caldwell M. W., 1994 - Developmental constraints and limb
evolution in Permian and modem lepidosauromorph
diapsids. J. Vert. Paleo., 14: 459-471.
Caldwell M. W., 1999a - Description and phylogenetic rela-
tionships of a new species of Coniasaurus Owen, 1 850
(Squamata). J. Vert. Paleo., 19: 438-455.
Caldwell M. W., 1999b - Squamate phylogeny and thè rela-
tionships of snakes and mosasauroids. Zool. J. Linn.
Soc., 125: 115-147.
Caldwell M. W., 2000 - On thè aquatic squamate Dolicho-
saurus longicollis Owen, 1850 (Cenomanian, Upper
Cretaceous), and thè evolution of elongate necks in
squamates. J. Vert. Paleo., 20: 720-735.
Caldwell M. W., 2003 - “Without a leg to stand on”:
Evolution and development of axial elongation and
limblessness in tetrapods. Can. J. Earth Sci., 40: 573-
588.
Caldwell M. W. & Albino A., 2002 - Exceptionally pre-
served skeletons of thè Cretaceous snake Dinilysia
patagonica, Woodward, 1901. J.Vert. Paleo., 22: 86 1 -
866.
Caldwell M. W. & Cooper J., 1999 - Redescription, palae-
biogeography, and palaeoecology of Coniasaurus crassi-
dens Owen, 1850 (Squamata) from thè English Chalk
(Cretaceous; Cenomanian). Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 127: 423-
453.
Caldwell, M. W. & Dal Sasso C., 2004 - Soft tissue preser-
vation in a 95 million year old lizard: Form, function and
aquatic adaptation. J. Vert. Paleo., 24: 980-984.
Caldwell M. W. & Lee M. S. Y., 1997 - A snake with legs
from thè marine Cretaceous of thè Middle East. Nature,
386: 705-709.
Caldwell M. W. & Lee M. S. Y., 2001 - Live hearing in
Cretaceous marine lizards: first fossil record of vivipar-
ity in squamates. Proceedings of thè Royal Society,
Series B, 268: 2397-2401.
Caldwell M. W. & Lee M. S. Y., 2004 - Reevaluation of thè
Cretaceous marine lizard Acteosaurus crassicostatus
Calligaris, 1993. J. Paleo., 78: 617-619.
Calligaris R., 1987/1988 - 1 rettili fossili degli “strati calca¬
rei ittiolitici di Comeno” e dell’isola di Lesina. Atti del
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Trieste, 41 (1): 85-125.
Calligaris R., 1993 - Acteosaurus crassicostatus nuova spe¬
cie di Dolichosauridae negli strati calcarei ittiolitici di
Comeno. Atti del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale,
Trieste, 45: 29-34.
Carroll R. L. & deBraga M., 1992 - Aigialosaurs: mid-
Cretaceous varanoid lizards. J. Vert. Paleo., 12: 66-86.
Cope E. D., 1869 - On thè reptilian order Pythonomorpha
and Streptosauria. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 12: 250-
261.
Cornalia E., 1851 - Cenni geologici sull’Istria. Giornale
dell 'l. R. Istituto Lombardo, Milano, III.
Dal Sasso C. & Pinna G., 1997 - Aphanizocnemus libanensis
n. gen. n. sp., a new dolichosaur (Reptilia, Varanoidea)
from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon. Paleontologia
Lombarda, Milano, Nuova serie 7: 3-31.
Dal Sasso C. & Renesto S., 1999 - Aquatic varanoid reptiles
from thè Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) lithographic
limestones of Lebanon. Rivista del Museo Civico di
Scienze Naturali “E. Caffi”, Bergamo, 20: 63-69.
deBraga M. & Carroll R. L., 1993 - The origin of mosasaurs
as a model of macroevolutionary pattems and processes.
Evol. Biol., 27: 245-322.
Estes R., de Queiroz K. & Gauthier J., 1988 - Phylogenetic
relationships within Squamata. In: Estes R. & Pregili G.
(eds.). Phylogenetic Relationships of thè Lizard Families.
Stanford University Press, Stanford: 119-281.
Frazzetta T. FI., 1970 - Studies on thè fossil snake Dinilysia
patagonica Woodward. Part IL Jaw machinery in thè ear-
liest snakes. Forma et Functio, 3: 205-221.
Gervais P., 1852 - Zoologie et Paléontologie Francaises
(Animaux Vertébrés). Paris.
Greer A. E., 1991 - Limb reduction in Squamates: Identi¬
fication of thè lineages and discussion of thè trends. J.
Herp., 25: 166-173.
Hedges S. B. & Richard T., 2001 - At thè lower size limit in
amniote vertebrates: A new diminuitive lizard from thè
West Indies. Carribean Journal of Science, 37: 168-173.
Kornhuber A., 1873 - Uber einen neuen fossilen Saurier aus
Lesina. Herausgegeben von der k. k. geologischen
Reichsanstalt, Wien, 5 (4): 75-90.
Kornhuber A., 1 893 - Carsosaurus marchesetti, ein neuer fos-
siler Lacertilier aus den Kreideschichten des Karstes bei
Komen. Abhandlungen der geologischen Reichsanstalt
Wien, 17: 1-15.
Kornhuber A., 1901 - Opetiosaurus bucchichi, eine neue fos¬
sile Eidechse aus der unteren Kreide von Lesina in
Dalmatien. Abhandlungen der geologischen Reichsanstalt,
Wien, 17: 1-24.
Kramberger K. G., 1892 - Aigialosaurus : eine neue
Eidechse aus den Kreideschiefem de Insel Lesina mit
Rucksicht auf die bereits beschriebenen Lacertiden von
Comen und Lesina. Glasnika hrvatskoga naravoslovno-
ga druztv (Societas historico-naturalis Croatica) u
Zagrebu, 7: 74-106.
Lee M. S. Y., 1998 - Convergent evolution and character cor-
relation in burrowing reptiles: towards a resolution of
squamate relationships. Bio. J. Linn. Soc., 65: 369-453.
Lee M. S. Y. & Caldwell M. W., 1998 - Anatomy and rela¬
tionships of Pachyrhachis problematicus, a primitive
snake with hindlimbs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., B., 353:
1521-1552.
Lee M. S. Y. & Caldwell M. W., 2000 - Adriosaurus and thè
affinities of mosasaurs, dolichosaurs, and snakes. J.
Paleo., 1 A (5): 915-937.
Lee M.S.Y., Bell, G.L. & Caldwell, M.W. 1999 - The origin
of snake feeding. Nature, 400:655-659.
Lee M. S. Y., Caldwell M. W. & Scanlon J. D., 1999 - A sec-
ond primitive marine snake: Pachyophis woodwardi
from thè Cretaceous of Bosnia-Herzegovina. J. Zool.,
248: 509-520.
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
39
Linnaeus C., 1758 - Systema Naturae. (Systema naturae per
regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera,
species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis,
locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata.) Holmiae.
Systema Naturae.
$ Merrem B., 1820 - Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien.
Marburg.
, Meyer H. V, 1860 - Acteosaurus tommasinii aus dem
schwarzen Kredieschiefern von Comen am Karste.
j Palaeontographica, 7: 223-231.
Nopcsa F. B., 1903 - Uber die varanusartigen Lacerten
Istriens. Beitràge zur Palàontologie und Geologie Óster-
reich-Ungarns und des Orients, 15: 31-42.
Nopcsa F. B., 1908 - Zur Kenntnis der fossilen Eidechsen.
Beitràge zur Palàontologie und Geologie Osterreich-
Ungarns und des Orients, 21: 33-62.
Nopcsa F. B., 1923 - Eidolosaurus und Pachyophis : Zwei
neue Neocom-Reptilien. Palaeontographica, 65: 96-
154.
Norell M. A. & Gao K., 1997 - Braincase and phylogenetic
relationships of Estesia mongoliensis from thè Upper
Cretaceous, Gobi Desert and thè recognition of a new
clade of lizards. American Museum Novitates, 3211: 1-
25.
Oppel M., 181 1 - Die Ordnungen, Familien, und Gattungen
der Reptilien als Prodrom einer Naturgeschichte dersel-
ben. J. Lindauer, Munchen.
Owen R., 1850 - Description of thè fossil reptiles of thè
Chalk Formation. In: Dixon F. (ed.). The geology and
fossils of thè Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of
Sussex. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman,
London: 378-404.
Pianka E. R. & Vitt L. J., 2003 - Lizards: Windows to thè
Evolution of Diversity. University of California Press,
Berkeley.
Pierce S. & Caldwell M. W., 2004 - Redescription and phy¬
logenetic position of thè Adriatic (Upper Cretaceous;
Cenomanian) dolichosaur, Pontosaurus lesinensis
(Komhuber, 1 873). J. Vert. Paleo., 24: 373-386.
Polcyn M. J., Tchernov E. & Jacobs L. J., 1999 - The
Cretaceous biogeography of thè Eastern Mediterranean
with a description of a new basai mosasauroid from thè
‘Ein Yabrud, Israel. In: Tomida Y., Rich T. H. & Vickers-
Rich P. (eds.). Proceedings of thè Second Gondwanan
Dinosaur Symposium, National Science Monogaph,
Tokyo, 15 : 259-290
Rage J. C. & Escuillié F., 2000 - Un nouveau serpent bipè-
de du Cénomanien (Crétacé). Implications phylétiques.
Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Science, Paris, Serie
la, 330: 1-8.
Rieppel O., 1988 - A review of thè origin of snakes. Evol.
Biol, 22: 37-130.
Rieppel O. & Zaher H., 2000 - The intramandibular joint in
squamates, and thè phylogenetic relationships of thè fos¬
sil snake Pachyrhachis problematicus Haas. Fieldiana,
Geology. New series, NO. 43. Publication 1507.
Rieppel O. & Head J., 2004 - New specimens of thè fossil
snake genus Eupodophis Rage & Escuillié, from
Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous) of Lebanon. Memorie,
della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 32: 1-26.
Russell D. A., 1967 - Systematics and morphology of
American mosasaurs. Bulletin of thè Peabody Museum of
Naturai History, 23: 1-237.
Seeley H. G., 1881 - On remains of a small lizard from
Neocomian rocks of Comen, near Trieste, preserved in
thè Geological Museum of thè University of Vienna.
Quarterly Journal of thè Geological Society of London,
37: 52-56.
Snow F. H., 1878 - On thè dermal covering of a mosasauroid
reptile. Transactions of thè Kansas Academy of Science,
6:54-58.
Swofford D. L., 2002 - PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using
Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer
Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Tchernov E., Rieppel O., Zaher H., Polcyn M. & Jacobs L.
L., 2000 - A fossil snake with limbs. Science, 287: 2010-
2012.
Michael W. Caldwell - Vertebrate Palaeontology, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
& Department of Biological Sciences
Main: 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Office: Z424 biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
e-mail: mw.caldwell@ualberta.ca
A new species of Pontosaurus (Squamata, Pythonomorpha) from thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon
and a phylogenetic analysis of Pythonomorpha
Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano
Volume XXXIV - Fascicolo III
40
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
APPENDIX I
Character List
(a) skull roof
1. Premaxillary lateral foramina. Absent (0); present (1).
2. Premaxilla-maxilla contact. Immobile and suturai (0);
mobile and non-sutural (1). The coding for Pontosaurus
lesinensis as given by Pierce & Caldwell (2004) was
recoded from state (0) to state (1).
3. Dorsal process of maxilla. On middle or anterior end of
maxilla (0); on posterior half of maxilla (1). The coding
for Pontosaurus lesinensis as given by Pierce &
Caldwell (2004) was recoded from state (1) to state (0).
4. Posterior process of maxilla. Long, reaching or extend-
ing past middle of ventral margin of orbit (0); short, not
reaching middle of ventral margin of orbit (1).
5. Lacrimai. Present, either permanently separate or fusing
with prefrontal during ontogeny (0); absent, never pres¬
ent as a discrete element (1).
6. Jugal. Does not extend anteriorly past orbit (0); extends
anteriorly past orbit (1).
7. Nasals. Paired elements (0); single median element (1).
8. Antorbital ridge. Absent (0); present, extending anteri¬
orly from dorsal margin of orbit (1).
9. Frontals. Single median element (0); paired elements
(1).
10. Frontal. Enters orbitai margin, prefrontal does not con¬
tact postfrontal or postorbitai (0); excluded from orbitai
margin, prefrontal contacts postfrontal or postorbitai
(1).
1 1 . Frontals. Lateral orbitai margin deeply concave (0); lat¬
eral orbitai margin straight or only very slightly concave
(1) . The coding for Pontosaurus lesinensis as given by
Pierce & Caldwell (2004) was recoded from state (1) to
state (0).
12. Frontoparietal suture. In dorsal view, simple straight
transverse contact (0); in dorsal view, complex curved
or interdigitating contact (1).
13. Palpebrai (superciliary) ossifications on dorsal margin
of orbit. Present (0); absent (1).
14. Postorbital. Present (0), absent (1).
15. Postorbital ventral process. Small, forming less than
half of posterior orbitai margin, postorbital primarily a
temporal bone (0); prominent, forming half or more of
posterior orbitai margin, postorbital primarily an orbitai
bone (1). The coding for Pontosaurus lesinensis as
given by Pierce & Caldwell (2004) was recoded fforn
state (1) to state (0).
16. Posterior margin of orbit. Present and continuous (0);
present but with small gap (1); very incomplete, less
than 50% of posterior orbitai margin bordered by bone
(2) .
17. Pineal foramen. Present (0); absent (1).
18. Parietal table and jaw adductor muscles. Parietal table
moderately wide, jaw adduetors extend onto lateral
margin only of dorsal surface of parietal (0); parietal
table very wide, jaw adduetors restricted entirely to
ventral surface of parietal ( 1 ); parietal table a narrow
sagittal crest, jaw adduetors extend over entire dorsal
surface of parietal (2). The coding for Pontosaurus
lesinensis as given by Pierce & Caldwell (2004) was
recoded from state (2) to state (0).
19. Upper temporal arch. Complete, upper and lower tem¬
poral fenestrae separated (0); incomplete, upper and
lower temporal fenestra confluent (1).
20. Supratemporal. In deep position, on ventrolateral sur¬
face of parietal (0); in superficial position, on dorsolat-
eral surface of parietal (1).
21. Supratemporal. Small, less than half thè maximum
width of thè skull (0); large, at least half thè maximum
width of thè skull (1).
22. Quadrate suspension. Mobile, articulates dorsally with
squamosal, supratemporal and opisthotic (0); mobile,
articulates dorsally with supratemporal, little or no con-
tribution from other elements (1); mobile, articulates
dorsally with opisthotic, little or no contribution from
other elements (2). The coding for Pontosaurus lesinen¬
sis as given by Pierce & Caldwell (2004) was recoded
from state (?) to state (0).
23. Quadrate. Tympanic crest (outer conch) directed lateral-
ly and a well-developed wall (0); tympanic crest direct¬
ed laterally but a low ridge ( 1 ); distinct tympanic crest
absent and external surface of quadrate only weakly
concave (2).
24. Quadrate shape. Without large, posteroventrally curved,
suprastapedial process (0); with large, posteroventrally
curved, suprastapedial process (1).
25. Mandibular articulation of quadrate. Saddle-shaped,
with lateral and mediai condyles (0); fiat, a single con¬
tinuous condyle (1).
(b) braincase and associated structures
26. Ventromedial processes of frontals. Not contacting any-
thing below olfactory traets (0); abutting or sutured with
each other below olfactory traets (1); contacting paraba-
sisphenoid below olfactory traets (2).
27. Decensus parietalis. Weakly developed ridges/flanges
on ventral surface of parietal (0); prominent flanges
descending from lateral margins of dorsum of parietal
(1); prominent flanges form sidewall of braincase con¬
tacting entire dorsal margin of prootic (2). The coding
for Pontosaurus lesinensis as given by Pierce &
Caldwell (2004) was recoded from state (0) to state (1).
28. Decensus parietalis. Not contacting parabasisphenoid or
orbitosphenoid (0); contacting parabasisphenoid (1).
29. Optic foramina. Not enclosed in bone (0); enclosed
partly or entirely by frontals (1).
30. Trigeminal foramen or foramina. Anterior margin not
enclosed in bone (0); anterior margin enclosed by
descending flange of parietal (1).
3 1 . Crista prootica (ridge on lateral surface of thè prootic,
overhanging foramen prò nervi facialis). Well-devel¬
oped lateral flange (0); reduced to weak ridge, or absent
0).
32. Basisphenoid. Without long posterolateral flanges (0);
with long posterolateral flanges (1).
33. Supraoccipital. Situated ventral or posteroventral to
parietal, does not form part of posterior skull roof (0);
situated posterior to parietal, forms part of posterior
1
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
skull roof (1).
34. Posttemporal fenestra. Present as an opening (0); com-
pletely closed via suturai contact of thè skull roof and
otic region of braincase (1).
(c) palate and associated structures
35. Opening of Jacobson’s organ. Enclosed fully by maxil-
la and vomer, sometimes with a tiny contribution firom
thè septomaxilla, not confluent with choana (0);
enclosed partly by maxilla and vomer, confluent poste-
riorly with choana ( 1 ); enclosed fully by vomer and sep¬
tomaxilla only, not confluent with choana (2).
36. Vomer. Anterior or anteromedial to palatine (0); entire-
ly mediai to palatine (1).
37. Palatine-vomer contact. Immobile, suturai contact (0);
mobile, non-sutural contact (1).
38. Palatine. Long - as long as vomer (0); short - half as
long as vomer (1).
39. Palatine. Without distinct medially-directed process (0);
with distinct rectangular process projecting medially
from thè middle portion of thè palatine to thè skull mid¬
iine (1).
40. Interpterygoid vacuity (“pyriform recess” of Estes et
al., 1988). Open and wide (0); open and narrow (1).
41 . Pterygoid. Anterior (palatine) process merges gradually,
in a gentle curve, with thè lateral (ectopterygoid)
process (0); anterior process distinctly set off from lat¬
eral process, thè two portions meeting at a distinct “cor¬
ner” (1).
(d) lower jaw
42. Mental foramina on lateral surface of dentary. Three or
more foramina (0); two or fewer foramina (1).
43. Dentary. Curved in lateral view, with concave dorsal
(alveolar) edge (0); straight in lateral view, with straight
dorsal edge (1).
44. Subdentai shelf. Weakly developed (0); large (1); absent
(2).
45. Posterior margin of lateral surface of dentary. Shallow
notch present (0); no notch present (1); deep notch pres¬
ent (2).
46. Splenial. Large, extending anteriorly past middle of
tooth row (0); small, only reaching middle of tooth row
(1).
47. Splenial-angular contact. Not, or very slightly, exposed
in lateral view (0); greatly exposed in lateral view (1).
48. Coronoid. Anteromedial margin contacts splenial (0);
anteromedial margin does not contact splenial ( 1 ).
49. Surangular. Does not form large portion of articular
cotyle (0); forms half of articular cotyle ( 1 ).
50. Adductor fossa. Faces dorsomedially (0); faces dorsally
(1).
5 1 . Articular. Separate from both prearticular and surangu¬
lar (0); fused with prearticular but not surangular (1);
fused with prearticular and surangular (2).
52. Retroarticular process size. Intermediate, between 1 and
2 times articular cotyle (0); short, < articular cotyle (1);
long, >2 times articular cotyle (2).
(e) dentition
53. Maxillary teeth. Thirteen or more tooth positions (0);
between twelve and nine tooth positions (1); eight or
fewer tooth positions (2).
54. Dentary teeth. Thirteen or more tooth positions (0);
twelve to nine tooth positions ( 1 ); eight or fewer tooth
positions (2).
55. Palatine teeth. Absent (0); present (1).
56. Pterygoid teeth. Present (0); absent (1).
(f) axial skeleton
57. Vertebral articulatory surfaces. Slightly anterodorsal,
condyles facing slightly dorsally, only thè ventral edge
of thè articulatory surface is visible in ventral view (0);
vertical, condyles (if present) facing posteriorly, much
of thè articulatory surface is visible in ventral view (1);
anterodorsal, condyles facing very dorsally, none of thè
articulatory surface is visible in ventral view (2).
58. Number of presacrai vertebrae. 27 to 50 (0); 50 to 119
(1); 23 to 25 (2); 120 or more (3).
59. Number of cervical vertebrae. Seven (0); ten to eleven
(1); more than twelve (2).
60. Transverse processes of cervicals. On anterior end of
centrum (0); on middle of centrum (1).
61. Cervical intercentra (excluding atlas and axis inter-
centra). Fused to preceding centrum (0); sutured to pre-
ceding centrum (1); not sutured or fused to preceding
centrum (2).
62. Pachyostosis of mid-dorsal vertebrae and ribs. Absent
(0); present (1).
63. Body shape. Round, ribs smoothly curved (0); laterally
compresseci, middle and distai regions of ribs totally
straight (1).
64. Distally forked cloacal ribs (“lymphapophyses”).
Absent (0); present (1).
65. Tail. Cylindrical or only slightly lateral compresseci,
transverse processes well-developed, chevrons and neu-
ral spines not elongated (0); very laterally compresseci,
transverse processes reduced anteriorly and absent pos¬
teriorly, chevrons and neural spines elongated (1).
(g) shoulder girdle and forelimb
66. Scapulocoracoid. Present and large (0); present but
reduced (1); absent (2).
67. Anterior (primary) coracoid emargination. Present (0);
absent (1).
68. Clavicle. Present (0); absent (1).
69. Interclavicle. Present (0); absent (1).
70. Interclavicle. Cross-shaped, with lateral processes (0);
simple rod, without lateral processes (1).
71. Ossified sternum. Present (0); absent (1).
72. Number of rib attachment points to sternum. Four pairs
(0); three pairs (1); five pairs (2); two pairs or fewer (3).
73. Forelimbs. Large (0); small (1); absent (2).
74. Epipodials. Parallel (0); distally diverging (1).
(h) pelvic girdle and hindlimb
75. Scierai ossicles. Present (0); absent (1).
76. Scierai ossicles. Fourteen (0); thirteen or fewer (1); fif-
teen or more (2).
77. Epiphyses on appendicular skeleton. Present (0);
absent (1).
42
MICHAEL W. CALDWELL
APPENDIX II
Character Matrix
1 10 20 30
A NEW SPECIES OF PONTOSAURUS (SQUAMATA, PYTHONOMORPHA) FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF LEBANON
AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PYTHONOMORPHA
PI. 1 - Reconstruction of Pontosaurus kornhuberi. Painting by Fabio Fogliazza.
Ili - PELOSIO G., 1968 - Ammoniti del Lias superiore (Toarciano) dell’Al¬
pe Turati (Erba, Como). Generi Hildoceras, Phymatoceras, Paromce-
ras e Frechiella. Conclusioni generali, pp. 143-204, 2 figg., 6 taw.
Volume XVIII
I - PINNA G., 1969 - Revisione delle ammoniti figurate da Giuseppe Me¬
neghini nelle Taw. 1-22 della « Monographie des fossiles du calcaire
rouge ammonitique » (1867-1881). pp. 5-22, 2 figg., 6 taw.
II - MONTANARI L., 1969 - Aspetti geologici del Lias di Gozzano (Lago
d’Orta). pp. 23-92, 42 figg., 4 taw. n.t.
III - PETRUCCI F., BORTOLAMI G. C. & DAL PIAZ G. V., 1970 - Ri¬
cerche sull’anfiteatro morenico di Rivoli-Avigliana (Prov. Torino) e sul
suo substrato cristallino./?/?. 93-169, con carta a colon al 1:40.000, 14
figg., 4 taw. a colori e 2 b.n.
Volume XIX
I - CANTALUPPI G., 1970 - Le Hildoceratidae del Lias medio delle regio¬
ni mediterranee - Loro successione e modificazioni nel tempo. Riflessi
biostratigrafici e sistematici, pp. 5-46, 2 tabb. n.t.
II - PINNA G. & LEVI-SETTI F., 1971 - 1 Dactylioceratidae della Provin¬
cia Mediterranea (Cephalopoda Ammonoidea). pp. 47-136, 21 figg.,
12 taw.
Ili - PELOSIO G., 1973 - Le ammoniti del Trias medio di Asklepieion (Ar-
golide, Grecia) - 1. Fauna del «calcare a Ptychites» (Anisico sup.). pp.
137-168, 3 figg., 9 taw.
Volume XX
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI O., 1971 - La cultura di Remedello.
Problematica ed ergologia di una facies dell’Eneolitico Padano, pp.
5-80, 2 figg., 20 taw.
II - PETRUCCI F., 1972 - Il bacino del Torrente Cinghio (Prov. Parma).
Studio sulla stabilità dei versanti e conservazione del suolo, pp. 81-127,
37 figg., 6 carte tematiche.
Ili - CERETTI E. & POLUZZI A., 1973 - Briozoi della biocalcarenite del
Fosso di S. Spirito (Chieti, Abruzzi), pp. 129-169, 18 figg., 2 taw.
Volume XXI
I - PINNA G., 1974 - 1 crostacei della fauna triassica di Cene in Val Seriana
(Bergamo)./?/?. 5-34, 16 figg., 16 taw.
II - POLUZZI A., 1975 - 1 Briozoi Cheilostomi del Pliocene della Val d’ Ar¬
da (Piacenza, Italia)./?/?. 35-78, 6 figg., 5 taw.
Ili - BRAMBILLA G., 1976 - 1 Molluschi pliocenici di Villalvemia (Ales¬
sandria). I. Lamellibranchi. pp. 79-128, 4 figg., 10 taw.
Volume XXII
I - CORNAGGIA CASTIGLIONI O. & CALEGARI G., 1978 - Corpus
delle pintaderas preistoriche italiane. Problematica, schede, iconogra¬
fia. pp. 5-30, 6 figg-, 13 taw.
II - PINNA G., 1979 - Osteologia dello scheletro di Kritosaurus notabilis
(Lambe, 1914) del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (Ormthi-
schia Hadrosauridae). pp. 31-56, 3 figg., 9 taw.
III - BIANCOTTI A., 1981 - Geomorfologia dell’Alta Langa (Piemonte
meridionale)./?/?. 57-104, 28 figg., 12 tabb., 1 carta f.t.
Volume XXIII
I - GIACOBINI G„ CALEGARI G. & PINNA G„ 1982 - 1 resti umani fos¬
sili della zona di Arena Po (Pavia). Descrizione e problematica di una
serie di reperti di probabile età paleolitica, pp. 5-44, 4 figg., 16 taw.
II - POLUZZI A., 1982 - 1 Radiolari quaternari di un ambiente idrotermale
del Mar Tirreno, pp. 45-72, 3 figg., 1 tab., 13 taw.
Ili - ROSSI F., 1984 - Ammoniti del Kimmeridgiano superiore-Berriasiano
inferiore del Passo del Furio (Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano), pp. 73-
138, 9 figg., 2 tabb., 8 taw.
Volume XXIV
I - PINNA G., 1984 - Osteologia di Drepanosaurus unguicaudatus, lepido-
sauro triassico del sottordine Lacertilia. pp. 5-28, 12 figg., 2 taw.
II - NOSOTTI S. e PINNA G., 1989 - Storia delle ricerche e degli studi
sui rettili Placodonti. Parte prima 1830-1902. pp. 29-86, 24 figg., 12
taw.
Volume XXV
I - CALEGARI G., 1989 - Le incisioni rupestri di Taouardei (Gao, Mali).
Problematica generale e repertorio iconografico, pp. 1-14, 9 figg., 24
taw.
II - PINNA G. & NOSOTTI S., 1989 - Anatomia, morfologia funzionale
e paleoecologia del rettile placodonte Psephoderma alpinum Meyer,
1858 .pp. 15-50, 20 figg., 9 taw.
III - CALDARA R., 1990 - Revisione Tassonomica delle specie paleartiche
del genere Tychius Germar (Coleoptera Curculionidae). pp. 51-218,
$75 figg.
Volume XXVI
I - PINNA G., 1992 - Cyamodus hildegardis Peyer, 1931 (Reptilia, Placo-
dontia). pp. 1-21, 23 figg.
II - CALEGARI G. a cura di, 1993 - L’arte e l’ambiente del Sahara preisto¬
rico: dati e interpretazioni, pp. 25-556, 647 figg.
III - ANDRI E. e ROSSI F., 1993 - Genesi ed evoluzione di frangenti,
cinture, barriere ed atolli. Dalle stromatoliti alle comunità di scogliera
moderne./?/?. 559-610, 49 figg., 1 tav.
Volume XXVII
I - PINNA G. and GHISELIN M. edited by, 1996 - Biology as History. N.
1. Systematic Biology as an Historical Science, pp. 1-133, 68 figs.
II - LEONARDI C. e SASSI D. a cura di, 1997 - Studi geobotanici ed en-
tomofaunistici nel Parco Regionale del Monte Barro, pp. 135-266, 122
figg., 23 tabb.
Volume XXVIII
I - BANFI E. & GALASSO G., 1998 - La flora spontanea della città di
Milano alle soglie del terzo millennio e i suoi cambiamenti a partire dal
1700./?/?. 267-388, 71 figg., 30 tabb.
Volume XXIX
I - CALEGARI G., 1999 - L’arte rupestre dell’Eritrea. Repertorio ragionato
ed esegesi iconografica, pp. 1-1 74, 268 figg.
Volume XXX
I - PEZZOTTA F. edited by, 2000 - Mineralogy and petrology of shallow
depth pegmatites. Paper ffom thè First International Workshop, pp. 1-
117, 30 figs., 19 tabs.
II - PARISI B„ FRANCHINO A. & BERTI A. con la collaborazione di
POTENZA B. & RUBINI D., 2000 - La Società Italiana di Scienze
Naturali 1855 - 2000. Percorsi storici, pp. 1-163, 199 figg.
Ili - DE ANGELI A. & GARASSINO A., 2002 - Galatheid, chirostylid and
porcellanid decapods (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) ffom thè Eoce¬
ne and Oligocene of Vicenza (N Italy). pp. 1-31, 21 figs., 9 pls.
Volume XXXI
I - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2002 - The braincase of Placodus Agassiz,
1833 (Reptilia, Placodontia). pp. 1-18, 15 figs.
II - MARTORELLI G., 2002 - Monografia illustrata degli uccelli di rapina
in Italia. (1895). Riedizione a cura di Fausto Barbagli, pp. [XX] 1-216,
[14] 46 figg., 4 taw.
Ili - NOSOTTI S. & RIEPPEL O., 2003 - Eusaurosphargis dalsassoi n. gen.
n. sp., a new, unusual diapsid reptile ffom thè Middle Triassic of Besano
(Lombardy, N Italy). pp. 1-33, 19 figs., 1 tab., 3 pls.
Volume XXXII
I - ALESSANDRELLO A., BRACCHI G. & RIOU B., 2004 - Polychaete,
sipunculan and enteropneust worms from thè Lower Callovian (Middle
Jurassic) of La Voulte-sur-Rhòne (Ardèche, France). pp. 1-16, 9 figs.,
1 pi.
II - RIEPPEL O. & HEAD J. J., 2004 - New specimens of thè fossil snake
genus Eupodophis Rage & Escuillié, from Cenomanian (Late Creta-
ceous) of Lebanon. pp. 1-26, 13 figs., 1 tab.
Ili - BRACCHI G. & ALESSANDRELLO A., 2005 - Paleodiversity of thè
free-living polychaetes (Annelida, Polychaeta) and description of new
taxa from thè Upper Cretaceous Lagerstàtten of Haqel, Hadjula and
Al-Namoura (Lebanon)./?/?. 1-48, 8 figs., 1 tab., 16 pls.
Volume XXXIII
I - BOESI A. & CARDI F. edited by, 2005 - Wildlife and plants in tradi-
tional and modem Tibet: conception, exploration and conservation. pp.
1-88, 30 figs., 9 tabs.
II - BANFI E., BRACCHI G., GALASSO . & ROMANI E., 2005 - Agro-
stologia Piacentina, pp. 1-80, 7 figs., 1 tabs.
Ili - LIVI P. a cura di 2005 - I fondi speciali della Biblioteca del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. La raccolta di stampe antiche del
Centro Studi Archeologia Africana, pp. 1-250, 389 figs.
Volume XXXIV
I - GARASSINO A. & SCHWEIGERT G„ 2006 - The Upper Jurassic
Solnhofen decapod crustacean fauna: review of thè types from old
descriptions. Part I. Infraorders Astacidea, Thalassinidea and Palinura.
pp. 1-64, 12 figs., 20 pls.
II - FUCHS D., 2006 - Morphology, taxonomy and diversity of vampyropod
Coleoids (Cephalopoda) ffom thè Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon. pp.
1-28, 9 figs., 9 pls.
Le Memorie sono disponibili presso la Segreteria della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali,
Museo Civico di Storia naturale, Corso Venezia 55 - 20121 Milano
Pubblicazione disponibile al cambio
3 2044 114 248 032