£ii — - %
V
Quaestiones
cntomologicae
A periodical record of entomological investigations,
published at the Department of Entomology, Uni-
versity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
VOLUME III
1967
CONTENTS
Guest editorial - The role of the anateur in entomology 1
Adisoemarto - The Asilidae (Diptera) of Alberta 3
Book review 91
Book review 93
Frank - A serological method used in the investigation of
the predators of the pupal stage of the winter moth,
Operophtera brumata (L. ) (Hydriomenidae) 95
Book review 106
Sarai - Effects of temperature and photoperiod on embryonic
diapause inNemobiusfasciatus (DeGeer) (Orthoptera,
Gryllidae) 107
Book review 136
Guest editorial -Fascinating taxonomy 137
Madge - A revision of the Genus Lebia Latreille in America north
of Mexico (Coleoptera, Carabidae) 139
Book review 243
Guest editorial - The religious faith of the scientist 245
Murdoch - The biology of the lilac leaf miner,
Fabr. (Lepidoptera : Gracillariidae) 247
Bueger - Sense organs of the labra of some blood-feeding Diptera . 283
Book review 291
INDEX
11
AbaXy 95, 100
paralletepipedus f9S ,99 yl02
Acacesia, 277
Acheta commodus ,19^
diapause in, 114, 119, 125, 131
Adisoemarto,S. , 3
Alberta, ecological regions, 4, 70
Alex,A.H. , 6, 66
Alexander, G. , 127, 134
Alexander, N. , 132, 134
Alexander, R.D. , 110, 133
Alexiopogon tevrioola, 12
Allan, J.A., 3, 66
Altica chalyhea, 141
ohliterata, 179
woodsi, 141
anatrepsis, 132
Andrewartha, H.G., 107, 133
Andrewes, H.E., 225
animal communities, 93
animal ecology, 93
Anisopogon, 27
Antheraea pernyi , 114
antibodies,
formation, 103
of Operophteva, 95
antigens,
preparation of, 96
antiserum,
absorption technique, 101
preparation of, 96, 103
production of, 97
Aphelogenia, 166
hilineata, 197
hivittata, 196
furcata, 190
guttula, 199
spraguei, 190
vittata, 189, 190, 194
Arctia caia, 127
Ash, see Fraxinus
Asilidae,
cannibalism, 6
distribution, 3
general description, 3
habitats of adults, 4
predators of, 7
seasonal succession, 7
subfamilies, 3
Asilidae (of Alberta)
distribution, 4
feeding habits, 5
subfamilies, 7
taxonomy, 3, 7
Asilinae, 7, 54
Asilus , 58
abdominalis , 23
aestuans , 56
aridalis , 3,6,59,63,81,90
auriannulatus , 59, 62, 90
caoopilogus, 55, 56
callidus , 5, 58, 60, 73,77,79,89
oumhipilosus , 3,6,7,59,62,90
oylindvicus , 53
delusus , 58, 59, 81, 89
evythoonemius , 5,6,59,61,81
gilvus , 52
gramalis , 3,5,7,59,64,81,90
maculatus , 55
maroooanum , 44
mesae , 5, 6, 7, 59, 90
nitidifaoies , 5, 59, 61, 82, 89
oooidentalis , 58, 59, 79, 89
paropus , 59, 60, 77, 81
rufioornis , 30
sabaudus , 19
snowi , 59, 61, 77
assassin flies, see Asilidae
Baotvia, 55
Bail, T., 269, 280
Baker, R.H. , 4, 66
Balfour -Browne, F. , 225
Ball, E.D., 110, 133
Bates, H.W. , 140, 225
Beck, S.D., 132, 134
Bigelow, R.S., 120, 134
Birch, L.G., 107, 133
birds, population studies, 91
Blackwelder, R.E., 138, 225
Blanton, F.S., 4, 66
Blatchley, W.S., 110, 134, 225
blowfly, 114
Bombomima, 44, 45
oolwnbioa, 5, 46, 88
fernaldi, 46, 47, 88
insignis , 5, 46, 48
partitor, 46, 88
postioata , 5, 46, 47, 88
Bombyx mori, 107, 132
Bonelli, F.A., 225
Bofkovec, A.B., 243
Boyden, A.A. , 103, 104
Bradley, J.G., 140, 225
Bristowe, W.S., 6, 66
Bromley, S.W. , 4, 66
Brooks, A.R., 3, 66
Brown, J.H. , 3, 67
Browning, T.O., 114, 134
Brulle, G.A., 225
Buerger, G., 283, 288
Ill
Burdick, H.C., 118, 134
Burgess, A., 291
cannibalism (in Asilidae) , 6
carabids, 95
Carabus bivittatus , 196
oyanooepha lus , 1 64
vittatus , 166, 189
Casey, T.L., 140, 225
CeraturguSf 25
Chaboussou, F., 141, 225
Chaudoir, M. , 140, 225, 226
chemos ter Hants, 243
Chevrolat, L. , 140, 226
Chortophaga viridi fas data y 127
Chrysolina varians , 141
Chrysopsy 276
nigripes y 283, 286
Church, N.S., 118, 134
ClavatoT y 29
sabulommy 29
Clethrionomy s glareolus y 102
Clubionay 111
CocdnelZa septempunotatay 101
Cole, F.R. , 4, 67
Cole, P., 114, 134
Comantellay 8, 9, 42
falleiy 42, 43, 77, 87
rotgeriy 42, 43
Coquillett, D.W. , 28, 67
Cragg, J.B., 114, 134
crickets, 107
Crowle, A.J., 95, 104
Csiki, E. , 139, 226
Culicoides vaviipennis y 283, 284, 2i
Curran, C.H., 3, 67
Curtis, J., 226
Cushman, R.A. , 141, 226
see dlsOy Isely, D.
Cymindis y 218
Cyrtopogoriy 4, 9, 30
albitavsis y 32, 36
albovarians y 5, 32, 36
auratus y 32, 77, 78, 86
aurifeXy 3, 32, 33
auvipilosus y 11
bimaoulay 5, 32, 34, 81
dasyllis y 5, 32, 38, 81
distinoti tarsus ,3,5,32,34,71,81
glavealis y 3, 32, 36
inversus y 3, 32, 36
lineotarsus y 31, 37, 77
me lanop leurus , 34
montanus y 32, 35, 86
nebula y 38
nigator y 31
Cyrtopogon , (cont . )
nugatory 32, 38
praepes , 32 , 34
sansoniy 5, 31, 37
willistoni y 5, 32, 33, 77
Danilyevsky, A.S., 107, 134
Dasyllis insignis y 48
pubescens y 49
vivoxy 51
Dasypogon aeacus y 23
argenteus , 9
oandidus y 10
diadema , 6
elegantulus y 9
fasdventris y 10
fimbriatus , 31
gelascens y 10
manioatus y 27
nigripennis y 25
piles ellus y 11
politus y 29
spatullatus y 24
trifasdatay 9
trifasciatus y 10
Dasypogoninae , 7, 8
genera, 8
Dasypogonini , 8
Daulopogony 11
terrioolay 12
Defalco, R. , 103, 104
Dejean, P. , 226
Dempster, J.P., 95, 105
Dendroica petechia y 276
Dendrolimus pini y 127
Deutziay 261
Dianohomena , 166
abdominalis y 198
aemulay 196
bilineatay 197
oonvictor y 198
devinotay 196
miranday 188
quadrivittata y 196
soapularis y 187
diapause, 107
Dickson, R.C., 107, 134
Diotyna annulipes y 277
Digitaria sanguinalis y 110
Dimmock, F., 264, 280
Diogmites angustipennis y 6
Diptera, see also Asilidae, 3
blood- feeding, 283
Dromius apioalis y 208
Echimuthus y 164
ecology, 93
, 283
IV
ecological methods, 136
Efferia, 56
candidus , 56
electrophoresis, 102
Elton, C.S., 93
embryogenesis, 114
entomologists, 1
entomology, amateur, 1
beginnings, 1
classification, 1
World Congresses, 1
Erannis , 102, 103
antigen, 100
auran ti avia , 9 9
defoliavia, 99
EvaXy 56
hioaudatus , 57
oanus , 57
costalis , 58
vufihavbis , 56
suboupveus y 5, 57
Euavmostus , 30
bimaoula, 30, 34
Eucyvtopogon , 8, 9, 38
albibavbis y 5, 39, 40, 87
oalcavatay 39, 41
comantis y 39, 40, 82
divevsipilosus y 39, 42, 82
inoompletus y 3,39,40,73,76,80
nebulOy 39, 42
spinigevay 39, 41
Euomymus y 261
Eupalamus y 30
alpestvis y 30
Evans, H.E., 106
Fabricius, J.C. , 140, 226
Feinberg, J.G., 105, 106
flea beetle, 141
Forbes, W.T. , 226, 255, 280
Formica neoclavay 276
Fourcroy, A.G., 226
Frank, J.H. , 95, 105
Freund, J. , 97, 105
Fvaxinus y 248, 261
amevicanay 251
divevsifo lia , 251
excelsior y 249, 250, 251, 281
pennsylvanica y 251
potamophila y 251
pubes cens y 251
rotundi folia y 250
Fulmek, L., 255, 280
Fulton, B.B., 110, 134
Galerucella cavicollis y 141
luteolay 141
gamma globulins, 98, 101
Gemminger, M. , 226
Geoffroy, E.L., 226
Gladstone, G.P., 98
Glossina morsitans y 284, 286, 290
palpalis y 283, 286
Gonypes , 53
Gooding, R.H. , 243
Gracillaria syringellay 247
adaptations, 263
dimensions, 256, 257
dispersal, 278
distribution, 249, 250
history, 249
host plants, 261
larval structure, 265
leaf rolling, 268
life cycle, 258
mines, 267
mortality, 275
populations, 270, 271
Gradwell, G.R., 95, 105
Graham , P . , 91
Grapholitha molestay 129
Gryllulus mitratus y 119
Gryllus pennsylvanicus y 119, 132
habitat systems, 93
Eaematobia irritans y 284, 287, 289
Haldeman , S . S . , 226
Halliburton, W.H. , 127, 134
Harvey, W.R. , 107, 134
Hatch, M.H. , 140, 226
Heald, F.D., 269, 280
Hebard, M. , 110, 134
Eeteropogony 9, 27
wilcoxi y 3,28,73,80,81,86
Hentz, N.M. , 226
Hering, E.M. , 261, 263, 266,280
Hine, J.S., 56, 67
Hogan, T.W. , 114, 135
Hogan’s method, 108
EolopogoHy 9, 25
albipilosay 26
albipilosus y 5,71,78,80,86
nigripilosay 3, 5, 26, 27, 81
seniculus y 26
Eomalops y 164
Horn, G.H., 140, 227
Hull, F.M. , 3, 67
Hutchings, C.B., 251
Eybomitra rupestris y 283,285,289,290
Hydr iomenidae , 9 5
Immunoelectrophoresis, 102
insect populations, 136
Isely, D. , 141, 226
V
Itopleotis quadrioingulata f
James, M.T. , 6, 68
Jobling, B. , 283, 288
Johnson, C.M. , 104, 105
Kaltenbach, J.H., 261, 280
Kogure, M. , 107, 135
Kozhanchikov, I.V. , 114, 135
labrum, 283
Lack, D. , 91
Lconprias j 164, 219
oyanellus , 177
oyanipennis , 176
limbioollis y 180
Laphria, 44, 48
aeatus , 5, 49, 50, 80
aimatis f 48, 52, 88
fulvithovaXy 45
gilva, 5, 48, 52, 88
index ^ 3, 5, 49, 51
5, 49, 51, 73, 78, 82, 88
postioata, 47
saokenif 88
sadales , 5, 48, 49, 80
, 3 , 5 , 49 , 50 , 72 , 78 , 80 , 87
vivaXy 49, 51
vultur, 88
xant/zippe, 48, 49, 76, 79,80,82,87
Laphriinae, 7, 43
de LaPorte, F. , 111
Lasiopogon, 4, 8, 11
aldriohiy 12, 18, 79, 80
oanusy 3, 12, 17
ainereUS yl2 ylS yll ylS yll ySO ySl)
hineiy 3, 5, 12, 18
primay 3,12,16,80,81,83
quadrivittatus ,5,6,7,11,14,76,78
ripicolay 12, 15, 77
tevricolay 5, 11, 12, 71, 83
trivittatusy 3, 5, 11, 13, 77,83
Latreille, P.A. , 140, 111
Leach, W.E., 111
leaf miners, 247
Lebia^
abditUy 201
abdomina lis , 198, 229
abruptUy 170
adolesoens y 178
aemulay 196
af finis y 180
connioolay 190
analiSy 184, 208, 230, 234, 239
anohoray 184
appendioulata y 184
arizonicay 175
ashenvillensis y 208
(cont . )
atrioeps jylSl) y 232, 241
atriventris y 153, 232
axillavis y 208
bavbavae, 176
bioinotay 111
bilineatay 197
bitaeniatay 171, 230
bivittatay 196, 229, 231, 235
bonelliiy 184
boreay 170
bvaoatay 178
bvunneay 208
brunnioollis y 218
biMieliae y 213
calliope y 111
callizonay 111
canonioay 203
oastigatay 178
characters of, 142
ohloropteray 218
cobaltinay 178
color of, 142
collavis y 208, 214
ooncinnay 165
Qong ungens , 190
conviotoTy 198
cyaneoy 177, 181
cyanellay 111
oyanipennis , 176
cynicOy 111
debiliceps y 190
deceptrixy 158, 232, 229, 230
depiotay 190
devinotOy 196
distribution, 144
divisoy 165, 230, 233
doubtful species, 218
duluthianOy 178
enormis y 154
erythrooephalay 208
esuridhs y 111
evolutOy 178
flaviventris y 218
flavolineata y 187, 218
flavovittata y 189
fluviatilis y 208
frigidOy 208
frontalis y 170
frugalis y 215
furcatay 189, 231
fusoatay 203, 208
grandisy 161, 229, 230, 232
guttulay 199
histricay 178
247,276 Lebiay
VI
Lehia (cont . ) ,
histvionioa , 193
mini, 215
inoitata, 178
insulata, 202, 229
key to species, 148
lecontei, 163, 229
lecta, 213
lobulata, 207, 218
ludovioiana, 215
maculicornis , 215
magica, 178
magistev, 161
maQUScula, 161
male genitalia, 143
mavginella, 208
melaena, 176
metuens, 199
miranda, 188, 235
moesta, 177
montana, 176
morphology, 142
nanulina, 155
nigrioapitata , 195
nigvipennis , 208
nigrosignata , 193
omata, 184, 208, 218, 231,236,239
papago, 178
peotita, 194
perallida, 206
perita, 182
phylogeny, 218
planifera, 178
pleuritioa, 173
primalis , 159, 232
prominens , 178
pulohella, 167, 168, 230, 233
pumila, 215, 229
puno tifera , 218
quadrivittata , 196
reperta, 208
rhodeana, 170
rhodopus , 215
rivularis , 161
ruficollis , 176
rufop leura , 172
soalpta, 186, 234
scapula, 183, 230, 234
scapularis , 166, 187,189,190,218
soutellata, 193
smaragdula, 177
solea, 187, 229, 230, 235
somonae, 190
subaf finis , 178
subdola, 157, 232
Lebia (cont . ) ,
subfigurata, 218
subgrandis , 160, 230, 232
sublimata, 218
subrugosa, 205
tahoensis , 167
tempeana, 190
tertearia, 215
testacea, 163, 164
tricoloT, 156, 232, 239
tvuoheensis , 178
tuckeri, 174
vermiculina, 178
virginica, 208
viridipennis ,170,229,233, 238
vividis, Yll , 180, 215, 229,230
vittata, 189, 190, 231, 235, 237
vivida, 167
websteri, 187
Lebida, 165
Lebis solea, 167
LeConte, J.L., 111
Lees, A.D. , 107, 135
Leng, C.W. , 227
Leone, C.A., 103, 105
Lepidoptera, 95
Leptinotavsa deoemlineata , 141
Leptogaster, 53
ap^S^^s,3,5,7,53,54,73,78,80,82
coloradensis , 3, 54
Leptogastrinae, 7, 53
Lestomyia , 9, 29
sabulonum, 5, 6, 7, 29,76,80,81
Lia femovata, 171
Libby, R.L., 103, 105
Ligustrum , 248, 261
ca lifornicum , 251
japonioum, 251
ovali folium, 251
vulgare ,251
lilac, see Syringa
Lindroth, C.H., 181, 111
Linnaeus, C., 1, 111
Lissoteles , 9
hermanni , 9
Listroderes obliquus , 131
Locustana pardalina, 132
LoxopezOy atrioeps, 155
atriventris , 153
enormis , 154
grandis, 161
magistev, 161
magusoula, 161
nanulina, 155
pimalis , 159
VI 1
Loxopeza (cont . ) ,
rivulariSf 161
testacea, 164
tricolor, 156
tuokeri, 176
Lucilia sericata, 114, 131
Lugger, 0., 110, 135
Lutshnik, V.N., 111
Maar, A., 254, 259, 261, 280
Madge, R.B., 139
mammals, bibliography, 137
experimental , 96
Martin, C.H., 3, 4, 68, 69
Masaki, S. , 118, 135
Matthee, J.J., 132, 135
Melander, A.L., 4, 68
Me lanop lus^ hivi ttatus^ 125
devastator, 127
mexioanus , 125
Melin, D. , 4, 68
Metabola, 166
rufopyga, 166
vivida, 167
Miorohemhix, 106
Miller, R.S., 93
Moss, E.H. , 3, 69
Motschoulsky, V., 140, 227
Myoohaoteriym hutyrieum, 97
McKelvey, S.D., 248, 281
tiebria, 101
brevicollis , 101
Negasilus, 65
belli, 5, 65, 77, 81
Nemobius,
age, 115
alternating temp, effect, 124
collection of, 108
diapause, 107
distribution, 110
ecology, 108
eggs, 126
diapausing, 120
post -diapause, 122
pre-diapause, 119
fasoiatus , 107
lab study, 115
life cycle, 110
low temperature effect, 127
nymphs, development, 116
effects of light on, 129
oviposition, 132
photoperiod, 115, 127
seasonal rhythm. 111
submergence of, 117
temperature sensitivity, 112
Nemobius (cont . ) ,
voltinism, 113
yezoensis , 127
Neopogon , 9
Nerax , 56
bioaudatus ,6 ,St> ,72 ,77 ,79 ,^1 ,S2 ,^9
oanus , 57, 82
Qostalis , 57, 58, 82
subcupreus , 57, 82
iHoocles , 8, 29
analis , 29
punotipennis , 30
utahensis , 30, 72, 73, 77, 78, 80
Nomadaoris septem fas data, 127
nomenclature, see also taxonomy
code of, 2
Norris, M.J., 127, 135
Nossall, G.J.V., 95, 105
nymphal development,
in Nemobius fasoiatus , 116
Nyssoninae, 106
Odynsky, W. , 3, 69
Oliver, A.G., 228
Omalomorpha, 164
Operophtera brumata , 95
antigen, 96, 100
collection of predators of, 96
Orthoptera, systematics of, 3
Ospriooerus , 8, 23
abdominalis , 23, 24, 71, 80
aeacides , 24
consanguineus , 23, 24, 80, 83
pumilus , 23, 24, 25
ventralis , 24
Ouchterlony concept, 104
Fa lamopogon , 31
alpestris , 31
Parasemia plantaginis , 127
Phalera bucephala, 131
Philammosius , 31
Philodromus aureolus , 277
Philonthus decorus , 95, 100, 101, 102
Phlebotomus papatasii , 132
Phormia regina, 100
photoperiod, 107
photronreflectometer, 103
Phyllyrea media, 261
Pinaoodera, 218
Podootria, 25
Poeoilostola, 163
Pogonosoma , 43 , 44
ridingsi , 7 9
strioklandi ,7) ,72 , 73,76,80,81
Polyoheloma, 163, 219
Populus nigra, 261
Vlll
precipitin reaction, 100, 102
precipitin test, 98
predator-prey studies, 95
predators, of Asilidae, 7
Pritchard, G. , 94, 136
privet, see Ligustrwn
Prootacanthella f 55
cacopi toga ,6,7,56,72,77,79,80,89
Promaohus , 54, 55
dimidiatus , 55, 79, 82
Proom, H. , 103, 105
proteins, precipitin reaction, 102
Pterostichus f 95
madidus , 100, 102
melanarius , 100, 102
Pussard, R. , 254, 258, 281
Putzeys, J.A.A.H., 228
Pygostolus , 29
Quedius lateralis ^ 101
Rakshpal, R. , 118, 135
Readio, P.A. , 107, 135
Reaumur, R.A.F. de, 249, 281
robber flies, see Asilidae
i?esa, 276
Roubaud, E., 132, 135
Salt, R.W. , 118, 134
sand wasps, 106
Sarai, D.S., 107
Say, T., 140, 228
Soamhus hispae , 247, 276
Schaeffer, C.F.A. , 228
Schwarz, E.A. , 228
SoleropogoYLf 19
negleotus f 22
piotioomis f 19
pwnilus , 25
Scudder, H.I., 283, 288
seasonal succession,
of Asilidae, 7
sense organs, 283
serological method, re:
winter moth predators, 95
Sich, A., 261, 281
silkworm, 114
Silvestri, F. , 140, 228
Simpson, G.G. , 139, 228
Simuliwn venustum, 283, 284, 289
vittaturrij 283, 284
Snodgrass, R.E., 228
Southwood , T . R . E . , 136
Spencer, K.A. , 2
Speirs, R.S., 95, 105
Sphecoidea, 106
Spilosoma menthastri ^ 131
Stager, R. , 261, 281
Steiner, A.L., 106
Stenopogon , 8, 19
oonsanguineus , 24
ee^ete,6,7,20,23,71,81
gratus , 20, 21, 84
inquinatus ,5,6,20,71,76,78,80,85
latipennis , 24
modestus f 21
morosus f 21
negleotus , 6, 7, 20, 22, 74, 85
ohsouriventris , 5, 20, 71, 73, 84
pumilus , 24
rufiharhis, 20, 84
univittatus , 21
Stenopogonini , 8
Stiohopogon ,8,9
argenteus, 9, 71
trifasoiatuSf 9, 10, 71,74,77,78
Stichopogonini, 8, 11
Stilopogon, 9
aequioinotus , 9
Stomoxys oaloitrans , 284, 287, 289
Strickland, E.H. , 3, 69
stridulation, 291
Strohecker, H.F., 110, 135
Strokov, V.V. , 249, 258, 281
Symphoricarpos , 261
Syringa, 2M , 261
amurensis y 281
ohinensis , 248
distribution, 248
emodi, 250
history, 248
gosikaea, 250
pekinensis f 250
persioa, 250
reflexa, 250
rothomagensis , 248
villosa, 250
vulgaris, 248, 250, 251
Sy sterna Naturae, 1
taxonomy, see also nomenclature, 2
of Asilidae, 7
general, 137
Telegoneura, 55
Te tragnatha , 277
Theobald, F.V., 258, 281
Thiodina, 111
Thomas, E.S., 110, 133
ticks (of Alberta) , 3
Tragardh, I., 254, 281
Trupanea, 55
Tuxen, S.L., 291
Varley, G.C., 95, 105
Vickery, V.R., 110, 135
voltinism, in Nemohius fasoiatus y 113
Von Gemet, G., 283, 288
Wadsworth, C. , 104, 105
Way, M.J., 94
Webb, R.A. , 98
West, A.S., 95, 105
Wieme, R.J., 95, 105
Wigglesworth, V.B., 245
Wilcox, J., 4, 69
Williams, C.A. , 102, 105
winter moth, see Operophtera hrumata
World Congresses, 1
World Weather Records, 113
Wytham Woods, 93, 95
Quaestiones
entomologicae
A periodical record of entomological investigations,
published at the Department of Entomology, Uni-
versity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canodo.
VOLUME III
NUMBER 1
JANUARY 1967
1
!
QUAESTIONES ENTOMOLOGICAE
A periodical record of entomological investigations, published at
the Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Volume 3 Number 1 11 January 1967
CONTENTS
Guest Editorial 1
Adisoemarto - The Asilidae (Diptera) of Alberta 3
Book Review ,91
Guest Editorial - The Role of the Amateur in Entomology
Entomology has now become an essentially professional science.
Many younger entomologists - professionals in the true meaning of the
word and experienced in all the modern techniques of entomology, such
as genetics and statistics andusing complex tools like the electron micro-
scope - are possibly not fully conscious these days of the dominant role
the amateur has played in the past.
Progress in the science of entomology proceeded slowly from the
early beginnings in China, Greece and Rome, but already in the 17th and
early 18th centuries accurate observations and illustrations were being
recorded by such people as Maria Sibylla Merianin Holland and E. Albin
in England and John Ray made a significant advance with his classification
of insects published in 1710. The great leap forward, however, took
place from the middle of the 18th century following publication of the
first edition of the "Systema Naturae" by Linnaeus in 1738.
The great era of amateur entomology followed from the end of the
18th century and throughout the 19th with a flourishing of individual col-
lectors, local societies and journals. Vastnumbers of new species were
described and the first major systematic works were published. This
was largely the work of amateurs. It is true that great confusion has
been caused by the uncritical nature of much 19th century work but, as
any taxonomist knows, the problems of clas sification ar e not easy. Mis-
takes were inevitable. The important thing, however, was that the enor-
mous problem of attempting to name and classify all insects throughout
the world had begun. Without the enthusiasm, dedication and passionate
interest in insects shown by the amateur in the past, the tremendous ad-
vances in entomological knowledge and achievement in recent years would
not have been possible.
Just prior to and following the Second World War, the dominance
of the professional in world entomology became complete and a major
expansion in the organisation of entomology began which is still continuing
at the present time. The dramatic development in entomology during the
past 50 years is clearly reflected by the attendance at World Congres ses .
Both at the 1910 Congress in Brussels and the 1912 Congress in Oxford
there were less than 150 members, while at the second Congress held in
England in 1964 in London the numbers were approaching 2, 000. While
amateurs played an important part in the organisation of the early Con-
gresses, only a handful were members of the 1964 Congress and papers
were read by an even smaller number.
2
Spencer
In view of the overwhelming professionalisation of entomology to-
day, what contribution of importance can now be made by the amateur?
The life histories even of many of the commoner insects are not fully
known and the detailed work of rearing individual species is the sort of
work admirably suited to the limited time and means of younger amateur s .
Careful observation will reveal many unknown facts . The journals of
local societies will normally provide an outlet for publication of such
small scale studies . For the pure collector the preparation of local lists
either of all orders in a limited area or of one order in a wider field will
always provide information of value. The collection of any of the lesser
known orders or of particular biological groups such as galls or leaf
mines offers unlimited scope for exciting new discoveries.
The achievement of any original taxonomic work by amateurs be-
comes increasingly difficult. The multiplicity of species, the complexity
of the code of nomenclature and the proliferation of literature, now pub-
lished in numerous languages, necessitate years of patient study and
work before one can venture into original publication. Few amateurs
are prepared to devote their entire free time for years on end to ento-
mological study of this kind which alone will qualify them as taxonomists.
A further major difficulty for any taxonomist is the study of types.
Numerous species cannot be identified with certainty from the descrip-
tion alone and, in cases of doubt, personal examination of the holotype
will always become es sential. Confronted with this problem, the amateur
is not in a position to apply for a grant and fly off to examine the type in
question. He is dependent on the institution, wherever it may be, sending
the type to him as a loan. Unfortunately, many leading museums and
institutions refuse to lend types and here I would like to emphasise how
much this negative policy must be deprecated. The inability to study
types can represent a serious handicap to scientific work and not only
amateurs suffer in this way. There is even one well known European
museum which, in the past, has refused to allow a number of its types
even to be examined at all "owing to their great historical value". With
such a policy the scientific value of the types concerned becomes nil.
Surely the whole policy in relation to types must hinge on their value for
the advancement of scientific knowledge and any policy which frustrates
this must be wrong.
The early Chines e around 500 B.C. listed in the Erh-ya 53 species
of insects, while Aristotle recorded 47 species and Pliny in Rome 300
years later 61. Today the number of described species is approaching
the million mark, while almost certainly an equal number remain to be
discovered and described. Despite the immense progress of the past the
tasks still facing entomology are formidable and any contribution which
can be made by the dedicated amateur should be given every possible
encouragement by professionals. The enthusiasm of the one combined
with the experience and skills of the other will always prove a felicitous
combination which can only benefit the science to which we are all devoted.
Kenneth A. Spencer
19 Redington Road
London N. W. 3, England
Adisoemarto
3
THE ASILIDAE (DIPTERA) OE ALBERTA
SOENARTONO ADISOEMARTO
Entomology Research Institute Quaestiones entomologicae
K.W. Neatby Building, Carling Avenue „ fo<7
Central Experimental Farm
Ottawa, Ontario.
A taxonomic treatment for the adults of 85 species of Asilidae of Alberta and brief notes
on their ecological relationships and habitats are presented. To the 66 species listed by Strickland
(1938, 1946) the following eleven are added: Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander, L. hinei Cole and
Wilcox, L. canus Cole and Wilcox, Heteropogon wilcoxi James, Cyrtopogon aurifex Osten-Sacken,
C. inversus CtTrran, C. giaiealis Melander, haphria scorpio Me Atee, L. index A/cA^ee, Leptogaster
aridus Cole, and L. coloradensis James. Eight new species, Lasiopogon prima, Holopogon
nigripilosa, Cyrtopogon distincti tarsus, Eucyrtopogon incompletus, Pogonosoma stricklandi,
Asilus aridalis, A. gramalis, and A. cumbipilosus, are described.
The Asilidae^ also known as robber flies or assassin flies, are
predaceous insects, easily recognized by their morphological characters
as well as by their activities. All of these flies have an excavated front
and vertex to form a V-shaped depression. Both sexes are dichoptic.
Some characters show sexual dimorphism.
The family consists of about 5000 known species, distributed over
the six zoogeographic regions. Hull (1962) listed the number of species
occurring in each region. According to Martin (1965), the Nearctic
Region has the greatest number of species. There are five subfamilies:
Dasypogoninae, Leptogastr inae, Laphriinae, A silinae, and Megapodinae.
The last subfamily is confined to the Neotropical region. Fifteen of 18
genera described from the Eocene, the Oligocene, and the Miocene, are
still living (Hull 1962).
Alberta is a province where many differ ent zoogeographic elements
meet and play roles in the diversity of the living beings occurring there.
Allan (1943) has described the geology. Moss (1955) has provided the
description of the plant communities in Alberta, and Odynsky (1962) has
presented a map of soil zones of Alberta.
Few groups of insects or other arthropods of Alberta, have been
studied on a regional basis. The systematics of the acridoid Orthoptera
of southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, have been presented
by Brooks (1958), and a study of the spotted fever and other Albertan ticks
has been made by Brown (1944). Lists of some groups of insects have
been published, including an annotated list of the Diptera of Alberta by
Strickland (1938, 1946). This study was mainly of taxonomy and geo-
graphical distribution, but some ecological notes, which may be useful
for further ecological study, are also presented. The A silidae of Alberta
have not been studied in detail, although a few new species have been
described from this province (Curran 1923). In Strickland's lists, 66
species of Asilidae were included, but eleven of these species probably
do not occur in Alberta. In this study, 19 species have been added to the
Alberta list, and of these eight are new species. The newly collected
4
Asilidae of Alberta
specimens are deposited in the collection of the University of Alberta,
and the holotypes and the allotypes of the new species are deposited in
the Canadian National Collection in Ottawa. The deposition of the speci-
mens examined is indicated by abbreviations between par entheses follow-
ing locality names. The abbreviations are:
AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York City, N. Y.
CAS California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California.
CNC Canadian National Collection, Ottawa, Ontario.
DE Mr. D. Elliott, Calgary, Alberta.
LMK Mr. L. M. Kenakin, Edmonton, Alberta.
UA University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
USNM United States National Museum, Washington, D. C,
WSU Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
Habitats of the Adults
Habitats of some species of the Asilidae have been described.
Melin (1923) studied the biology of the Asilidae of Sweden. James (1938)
discussed the habitat prefer ence of the Asilidae of Colorado, and Bromley
studied the habitats of the adults of Connecticut (1946) and of Florida
( 1950) . The following publications contain habitat data for certain groups:
Wilcox and Martin (1936) for Cyrfopo^on Loew; Melander (1923b) iov Lasiopogon
Loew; Baker (1939) for some species of robber flies from Coahuila,
Mexico; Blanton (1939); and Cole (1916).
The robber flies are sun-loving insects of dry open areas. Habitats
most commonly frequented are: dry fields, pastures, open bush country,
sandyareas, and edges of woods. According to Hull (1962), in desert or
semidesert country, these flies are attracted to small streams, and in
temperate regions, a few species occur in swampy areas and in deep
forest. Bromley (1946) stated that asilids were practically absent from
deep dark woods and swamps. For the state of Colorado, James (1938)
gave a list of five differ ent habitats in which he found asilids . The grass-
land habitat had the greatest number of species, 36, representing nine
genera. Bare areas and thickets were poor in Asilidae . Bromley (1946)
listed nine habitats for Connecticut. Seventeen genera containing 43
species were recorded from woodlands and bushy pastures . The species
of bushy pastures were similar to those of the woodlands, but more abun-
dant. Adults are collected consistently in Alberta in grasslands: pas-
tures, semi-arid short grass prairie, beach grassland (close to lake or
river), openings in the parkland forests; river banks and lake beach;
woodland paths; sandpits and sand dunes; coniferous forests; and bare
fields .
Distribution of Asilidae
Each ecological region of Alberta seems to have certain asilid
species. These species are more or less limited in their distribution
by the boundaries of these regions. The zonation of the province of
Alberta applied here is based on that of Moss (1955) and Brooks (1958).
Prairie
This region is by far the richest in asilid species. Of 37 species
Adisoemarto
5
recorded, 16 have not been found elsewhere in the province. Lasiopogon
terricola Johnson, L. quadrivittatus Jones, Stenopogon obscuriventris Loew,
Eucyrtopogon albibarbis Curran, and Asilus gramalis new species, have also been
found in the Parkland; Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander, Stenopogon inquinatus
Loew, and Asilus erythocnemius Hine, in the Boreal and the Bor eal-Cordil-
leran Transition; while Holopogon albipilosus Curran, Lestomyia sabulonumOsten-
Sacken, Erax subcupreus Schaeffer, Asilus mesae Tucker, Asilus gramalis new
species, Negasilus belli Curran, have also been found in the Subalpine and
the Montane regions . On the other hand, some species, Cyrtopogon willistoni
Curran, Bombomima columbica Walker, Laphria gilva L. , and Leptogaster aridus
Cole, may have been extending from the Subalpine and the Montane regions
into the Prairie region. Two species, Stenopogon inquinatus Loew and Cyrtopogon
bimacula Walker, are more or less ubiquitous in Alberta.
Boreal forest
There are 17 species recorded from the Boreal forest, but the
following species are limited to it: Holopogon nigripHosa new species, Bombomima
posticata Say, Laphria Scorpio McAtee, Laphria aeatus Walker, Laphria index
McAtee, and Asilus nitidifacies Hine . The species: Lasiopogon hinei Cole and
Wilcox, Bombomima insignis Banks, and Laphria janus McAtee, have extended
southward to the Parkland, and westward (except Bombomima insignis Banks)
to the Bor eal-Cordilleran Transition and Subalpine regions . Some other
species presentinthe Boreal region may have been the result of ' 'invasion"
from the Prairie, such as Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander and Asilus
erythocnemius Hine, or from the Subalpine or the Montane region, such as
Cyrtopogon dasyllis Williston, Laphria sedales Walker, and Asilus callidus
Williston. Cyrtopogon distinctitarsus new species is found in the Boreal forest
and in the Prairie.
Subalpine and Montane regions
The Subalpine region is the second richest in the species of Asilidae
in the province. Of 23 species recorded, only two are confined to this
region: Cyrtopogon sansoni Curran and Cyrtopogon albovarians Curran. The
remainder are elsewhere, mostly in the Montane region, with some
others in the Boreal and the Prairie regions. Another species found
here, Asilus erythocnemius , might have entered this zone from the Prairie
region.
Parkland and Boreal-Cordilleran
These regions are transitional. As one might have expected, asilids
found here are a mixture of species from two or more regions. In the
Parkland region, the species are mostly from the Prairie region, while
those in the Boreal-Cordilleran region, are mostly from the Subalpine
or the Montane regions. The Boreal species seem to have extended
equally to these two transitional regions.
Feeding Habits
Without exception, all species of the Asilidae are predaceous in
the adult stage. Food selection of this group, according to Hull (1962),
has been studied considerably, by Hobby and Poulton for the British
6
Asilidae of Alberta
Asilidae, Carerra for South American species, and in Notth America
by Bromley. However, according to James (1938), as far as food is
concerned, the Asilidae are indiscriminate. The food is variable, in-
cluding dragonflies, grasshoppers, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera,
Lepidoptera, and Diptera. Spiders as food have been reported by Bristowe
(1924) and Bromley (1946). Cannibalism has been reported in Diogmites
angustipennis Loew by Alex (1936), and in Alberta, there is a cannibalistic
tendency in Stenopogon inquinatus Loew. Cannibalism in association with
courtship has been reported in Dasypogon diadema Fabricius by Poulton
(1906).
TABLE 1. Dates of first appearance of some species of the Asilidae
and numbers collected, from some localities in southern Alberta.
Adisoemarto
7
Predators
The asilids have enemies : spiders, wasps, birds, lizards, mantids
(Hull 1962), and in very rare cases, the larvae of Cicindela Linnaeus. A
species of red mite was found attached to the external parts of some
specimens of the species Lasiopogon dnereus Cole and L. trivittatus Melander.
Seasonal Succession of Species
Seasonal succession occurs in the adult Asilidae. Bromley (1934)
mentioned the occurrence of four distinct groups of the Asilidae, in
Brazos County, Texas, according to the period or time of appearance.
Data from a few Alberta localities are presented in Table 1. Although
no conclusion can be drawn, there is slight indication, that in the southern
parts of Alberta, the adults occur as two seasonal groups. The first
group appears in early June. Included here are Lasiopogon quadrivittatus
Jones, Lestomyia sabulonum Osten- Sacken, Asilus mesae Tucker, Asilus cumbipilosus
new species, Asilus aridalis new species, and Asilus gramalis new species.
The second group appears in early August, and includes Stenopogon coyote
Bromley, Stenopogon neglectus Bromley, Leptogaster aridus Cole, Proctocanthella
cacopiloga Hine, Nerax bicaudatus Hine, and Asilus erytbocnemius Hine.
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
All of the subfamilies except the Megapodinae, which occurs only
in the Neotropical Region (Hull 1962), are representedin Alberta. Eighty
five species of 23 genera were recorded. The Dasypogoninae is the
largest subfamily: 11 genera with 49 species, followed by the Asilinae
with 19 species in eight genera. The Laphriinae is represented by 15
species of three genera, while Leptogastrinae has only two species of
Leptogaster Meigen.
KEY TO THE SUBFAMILIES OF ASILIDAE OF ALBERTA
1. Abdomen slender and cylindrical (fig. 102); second abdominal seg-
ment six times as long as first (fig. 103); wings with alula
greatly reduced or absent; hind femora club-shaped (fig. 85).
Leptogastrinae
Abdomen not slender, almost as broad as thorax (fig. 87); second
segment at most three times as long as first (fig. 104); alula
present; femora not club-shaped 2
2. Wings with marginal cell open (fig. 57) Dasypogoninae
Marginal cell closed (fig. 161) 3
3. Abdomen gradually tapering apically (fig. 104); second segment
three times as long as first; mediocubital crossvein of wings
absent, or M3 and Cu^ fused for a short distance at the place
of crossvein (fig. 165) Asilinae
Abdomen, up to sixth segment, parallel- sided, or broader at the
middle (fig. 101); second segment subequal to first; wings with
mediocubital crossvein present (fig. 161) Laphriinae
8
Asilidae of Alberta
Subfamily Dasypogonihae
Ten tribes comprise this subfamily, of which the Stichopogonini,
Stenopogonini, and Dasypogonini, are represented in Alberta. The
Stichopogonini is represented by Stichopogon Loew and Lasiopogon Loew;
Stenopogonini by S^enopo^on Loew, Ospriocerus Loew, H olo pogon L,oev^, Cyrtopogon
Loew, Eucyrtopogon Curran, and Heteropogon Loew; Dasypogonini by Comantella
Curran, Lestomyia Williston, and Nicocles Jaennicke.
Hull (1962) distinguished the Dasypogonini from the Stenopogonini
by the presence of a bent spine at apex of the front tibia, and placed
Comantella Curran in the former, Eucyrtopogon Curran in the latter. Based
on some other character s, these two genera should be placed in the same
group. Eucyrtopogon is more similar to Comantella Curran than to the rest
of the Stenopogonini.
Key to the Genera of Dasypogoninae of Alberta
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
Face bare, except on the oral margin; gibbosity not conspicuous
(fig. 3); ocellar bristles absent; dor socentrals absent (also
from Lasiopogon terricola Johnson) Stichopogon Loew
Face with hairs or bristles between oral margin and at least half-
way to antennal base (figs. 5, 10); ocellars and dor socentrals
present (except in Lasiopogon terricola Johnson) 2
Palpus one- segmented (fig. 40); vertex with posterior margin at
least twice as wide as front at antennal base (figs. 7, 9)
Lasiopogon Loew
Palpus two- segmented (fig. 42); vertex not widened posteriorly,
posterior margin at most one and half times as wide as front
at antennal base (figs. 15, 22) 3
Head (including eyes) higher than wide (fig. 14); front narrow, at
most as wide as long; upper occiput behind eyes strongly con-
vex ^ 4
Head wider than high (fig. 19); front wider than long; upper oc-
ciput behind eyes flat 5
Third antennal segment with promineht excision on inner side (figs.
123, 125) Ospriocerus Loew
Third antennal segment without such excision Stenopogon Loew
Wings with branches of third longitudinal vein slightly distad of
posterior crossvein (fig. 156) 6
Branches of third longitudinal vein clearly proximad to posterior
crossvein (fig. 158) 10
Dor socentrals (at least behind mesonotal suture) and scutellars
present; front forming an almost right angle with vertex. ... 7
Dor socentrals and scutellars absent; front almost horizontal,
slightly arched, not forming sharp angle with vertex 9
numerals absent Nicocles Jaennicke
numerals present 8
Metapleuron pilose or with bristles; third antennal s egment taper-
ing apically (fig. 130); no bent spine on apex of front tibia . . .
Adisoemarto
9
Heteropogon Loew
Metapleuron bare, third antennal segment dilated subapically (fig.
128); apex of front tibia with a bent spine ventrally
Lestomyia Willis ton
9. Hind basitarsus and hind tibia swollen distally (fig. 84); face al-
most flat (fig. 16); mesopleuron pilose Holopogon Loew
Hind basitarsus not swollen, hind tibia slender (fig. 79); gibbosity
rounded; mesopleuron with stiff hairs. Cyrtopogon Ljoew
10. Front tibia with curved spine at apex ventrally (fig. 77)
Comanfe//a Curran
Front tibia without such a spine Eucyrtopogon Curran
Genus Stichopogon Loew
Stichopogon Lioew 1847:499. Type species: Dasypogon elegantulus Wiedemainn.
Stilopogon Costa 1883 : 62. Type species: Stilopogon aequidnctus Costa.
Neopogon Bezzi 1910a : 147. Type species: Dasypogon trifasciata Say.
Lissoteles Bezzi 1910b : 177. Type species: Lissoteles hermanni Bezzi.
The genus Neopogon Bezzi was consider ed as a different genus from
Stichopogon Loew by Hull (1962) on the basis of the characteristics of the
chaetotaxy, the palpi, the vertex, and the body size. Curran (1934)
recognized only one genus under the name Neopogon Bezzi. Both Hull and
Curran treated Lissoteles Bezzi as a differ ent genus from Stichopogon Loew.
Hull further added three subgenera to the genus Stichopogon (s. s. ), namely
Dichropogon ezzi , Echinopogon Bezzi, and Cryptopogon White. Bromley (1951)
considered Neopogon Bezzi, Lissoteles Bezzi Echinopogon Bezzi, and Dichropogon
Bezzi, as synonyms of Stichopogon Loew.
Two species of this genus, argenteus Say and triiasciatus Say, are
known from Alberta.
Key to the Species of Stichopogon of Alberta
Uniformly silvery pollinose; mesonotal and abdominal pile long;
bristles on fir st abdominal segment weak, hardly distinguishable
from pile argenteus Say
Abdomen with black markings on dorsum of second, third, fifth,
and sixth segments; mesonotum with short suppressed hairs;
bristles on first abdominal segment strong and distinct
triiasciatus Say
Stichopogon argenteus Say
Dasypogon argenteus Ssiy 1823 : 51; 1869 : 65.
Stichopogon argenteus Back 1909 : 334.
This species is easily recognized by its uniform silvery color of
the pollen and the hairs. Antennae brownish black, bristles present on
lower sides of first two segments and upper side of second segment;
10
Asilidae of Alberta
face flat with slight elevation above epistoma (fig. 2); mystax of few
rows; palpus one-third as long as labium, pilose sub-basally; proboscis
with basal one-third of lower side silvery ^ollinos e, basal half pilose.
Thoracic pile long; scutellum with long hairs along posterior margin;
one presutural, onepostalar, and a row of metapleural bristles present.
Legs with pile anterolaterally on front coxa, laterally on middle coxa and
hind coxa, and on lower sides of femora; bristles present on tibiae and
tarsi; last tarsal segment, empodium, and pulvilli of equal length,
claws slightly longer than last tarsal segment. Wings clear, evenly
covered with micr otrichiae; mediocubital vein absent, and Cui fused
for a short distance. Abdomen elongate, pile longest on first two seg-
ments; ventral pile absent from first segment, shorter in females.
Slight variation occurs among the specimens, in the length of the first
segment of the style and the length of the fusion of M3 and Cu^.
The presence of this species in Alberta is doubted, but Strickland
(1938) included it in his list. It has been recorded from Manitoba to
Colorado, west to California, east to New York, south to Maryland; 22
specimens were examined.
Localities - MANITOBA: Onah (CNC). ONTARIO: Grand Bend (CNC). NEW YORK: Oak
Beach, Long Island (UA); Fire Island (AMNH); New York City (USNM). NEW JERSEY: Avalon
(USNM); Sea Side Park (USNM). ILLINOIS: Lake Forest (USNM). KANSAS: Medora (USNM).
CALIFORNIA: Los Angeles.
Stichopogon trifasciatus Say
Dasypogon trifasciatus Say 1823 : 51, 1869 : 64.
Dasypogon candidus Macquart 1846 : 67.
Dasypogon fasciventris Macquart 1850 : 69.
Dasypogon ge/ascens Walker I860 *. 277.
Stichopogon trifasciatus Williston 1886 : 289.
This species is easily distinguished from argenteus Say, by the char-
acters in the above key. Antennae with bristles on lower sides of first
two segments, and apical upper side of second; front and vertex golden
yellow pollinose; face pale yellow pollinose; mystax white, single row,
along upper mar gin of epistoma; palpus one -fifth as long as labium; pro-
boscis black, with silvery white pollen on basal half of lower side. Thor-
acic pile spar se, absent from mesonotum; the latter provided with semi -
appressed short black hairs; one presutural, one postalar, a row of six
metapleural bristles present. Legs with sparse pile; bristles present
onapicesof femora, on tibiae, and on tarsi. Wings clear, evenly cover ed
with micr otrichiae; veins brown; mediocubital cr os svein present, short.
Abdomen silvery white pollinose, with triangular black markings on
second, third, fifth, and sixth segments, with apices facing forward
(fig. 87); pile very sparse, short, but longer on side of first segment.
The antennae and the mediocubital crossvein vary slightly.
This species seems to prefer bar e areas, including exposed rocks,
wind blown areas, and stream sides (James 1938), open beach, sand
plains, restricted sandy or gravelly areas (Bromley 1946), and also
pastures or bare fields (including unpaved roads) near streams. It is
widely distributed in the United States and Canada; 63 specimens were
examined.
Adisoemarto
11
Localities - ALBERTA: Edgerton; Medicine Hat (UA).
Other localities - MANITOBA: Aweme; Onah (CNC). CALIFORNIA: San Diego Co. (CNC).
ARIZONA: Madera Canyon, St. Rita (U.A). NEW MEXICO: Silver City (UA), TEXAS: Brazos;
Madison; Frio; Be.xar; Travis; Burleson. WYOMING: New Castle, Weston Co. (AMNH) ,
NEBRASK-^: Broken Bow (AMNH). IOWA: Iowa City (AMNH); Ames (AMNH). ONTARIO:
Point Pelee (UA CNC); Orilla (UA); Grand Bend (CNC). QUEBEC: Hull (CNC). NEW YORK:
Long Island (AMNH).
Genus Lasiopogon Loew
Lasiopogon Loew 1847 : 508. Type species: Dasypogon pilosellus Loew.
Daulopogon Loew 1874 : 377.
This genus and Stichopogon Loew are grouped in the tribe Sticho-
pogonini (Hull 1962). Species of both genera have a complete prosternum
(fig. 66), wide front and vertex (fig. 9), but they are distinguished by
the shape of the gibbosity and the mystax (fig. 8).
Antenna with abundant strong hairs on lower sides of first two seg-
ments and apical upper side of second; third segment with apical style
(figs. 118-121); ocellar bristles present; palpus one-segmented; left
and right car dostipites separate, held together by membrane; upper half
of occiput usually with bristles, at least present behind orbital margin
as continuation of verticals; bristle-like hairs present on fr ontovertex,
except in Melander and terricola Johnson. Bristles on thorax
mostly onmesonotum; dor socentrals absent from terricola Johnson; Meta-
pleuron always with a vertical row of bristles; short or longer bristle-
like hair s on humeri; posterior mar gin of mesopleur on with long bristle-
like hairs, except in trivittatus Melander and terricola Johnson; pale pile on
upper posterior corner of sternopleur on. Bristle-like hairs present
anteriorly on front coxa, laterally on middle coxa, and sparsely on hind
pair; femoral bristles if present, subapical; tibial bristles arranged in
five rows, nine to 11 subapical bristles also present; tarsal bristles
arranged in circles. Wings hyaline, evenly cover ed with micr otrichiae;
marginal cell open, two submarginal cells always present, open; four
posterior cells always open; anal cell always closed; anterior cr os svein
always before middle of discal cell. Sides of first abdominal segment
usuallywith bristles and pale pile; male genitalia rotated 180°, bristles
present on hypandrium; ovipositor with acanthophorite s and spines,
valves of eighth sternum prominent (figs. 106, 107).
Nine species of this genus are present or listed as occurring in
Alberta. The record of one of them, ripicola Melander, is doubted,
while prima is described as a new species.
Key to the Species of Lasiopogon Loew of Alberta
1. Mystax entirely white 2
Mystax entirely black or mixed black and white 5
2. Dor socentrals and scutellars absent terricola Johnson
Dor socentrals and scutellars present 3
3. Scutellars white quadrivittatus Jones
Scutellars black 4
4. Two scutellars (fig. 67); mesonotum with few setulae; meta-
pleural bristles vdiite trivittatus Melander
12
Asilidae of Alberta
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Scutellar bristles numerous (fig. 68); mesonotum with more or
less numerous long hairs ripicola Melander
Mystax mixed white and black prima new species
Mystax entirely black 6
Apical abdominal bands absent; pollen if present, not forming
definite bands hinei Cole and Wilcox
Pollinose apical bands present and definite 7
Abdominal bands golden yellow, less than one-fourth of correspon-
ding abdominal segments, the rest of segment more or less
shining black .canus Cole and Wilcox
Abdominal bands greyish, wider than one-fourth of corresponding
segments, the rest of segment mostly brown 8
Male 9
F emale 10
Genitalia with superior forceps (surstyli) broad, length less than
twice the width; hypandrial bristles convergent
aldrichi Melander
Superior forceps with length four times the apical width (fig. 180);
hypandrial bristles more or less parallel cinereus Cole
Ovipositor not entirely black, valve of eighth sternum orange . . .
aldrichi Melander
Ovipositor entirely black cinereus Cole
Lasiopogon terricola Johnson
Daulopogon terricola Johnson 1900 : 326.
Lasiopogon terricola Back 1919 : 300-301.
Alexiopogon terricola Curran 1934 : 183.
Curran (1934) separated this species from the rest of Lasiopogon
Loew, and erected a new genus for it, Alexiopogon . However, the following
characters of this species show that it belongs in Lasiopogon Loew: the
shape of the gibbosity and the mystax, the size of the front and vertex,
the presence of the ocellar and the occipital bristles, the presence of the
long sparse pile on the vertex, the presence of the short hairs on the
humerous, the mouthparts, the male genitalia, and the ovipositor . Front
and vertex widened posteriorly, golden yellow pollinose, with a pair of
parallel grooves, convergent toward neck (fig. 7); bristles on head pale
yellowish; face oale yellowish pollinose. Thorax golden yellow pollinose,
paler on pleura; one or two presuturals, one or two intraalars, one or
two postalar s, black; metapleural bristles pale yellowish; dor socentrals
and scutellar s absent; mesonotum with a pair of brownish vittae and short
semi-appressed pale yellow hairs. Legs brownish; coxae black, pol-
linose; femora black dorsally; tibiae with pale yellowish hairs and pale
andblackbristles; tarsi with blackbristles; claws reddish brown ba sally,
black apically; empodium black; pulvilli yellow. Wings slightly longer
than abdomen; veins brownish. Abdomen shiny black, reddish brown
apically; very short, sparse, appressed pale hairs present; side of
first segment with weak bristles or bristle-like hairs; male genitalia
reddish, hypandrial bristles pale yellow, convergent; ovipositor reddish
Adisoemarto
13
brown.
This species is found on the low damp ground (Johnson 1900; Cole
and Wilcox 1938) as well as on dry sand bars or bare sand dunes. It
ranges from Alberta to Mas sachusetts, south to Virginia; 69 specimens
were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Fabyan (UA); Wainwright (UA); Provost (UA); Manyberries-
Orion (UA); Writing- on-Stone Provincial Park (UA); Lethbridge, OldmanRiver (UA); Medicine
Hat.
Other localities - NORTH DAKOTA: Mott (CNC), INDIANA: Bare Sand, Lafayette. OHIQ
Pine Creek, Hocking Co. VIRGINIA: Great Falls. MARYLAND: Plummer ' s I sland; Beltsville.
NEW JERSEY: Clementon; Lahaway, Ocean Co.; Riverton; Wenonah. MASSACHUSETTS:
Amherst; Chicopee.
Lasiopogon trivittatus Mel and er
Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander 1923b : 144-145.
Males of this species are described for the first time. Vertex
golden yellow pollinose; short stiff hairs present as a row of three to
four between grooves and orbital margin, and two pairs in front of ocel-
lar plate; ocellars black; occiput yellowish grey pollinose, occipital
bristles on upper margin and transversely behind vertex; mystax pale
yellow; antennae black, hairs on lower and apical upper sides of first
two segments black; proboscis black, pile on lower basal half white;
beard white. Prothorax golden yellow pollinose, paler toward ventral
sides; pile on pronotum, on episternum, and on epimeron, pale yellow-
ish; mesonotum grey to yellowish pollinose; dor socentral and acrostichal
vittae present, complete; presutural, intraalar, and postalar bristles
always single; presutural dor socentrals usually two, rarely one; post-
humerals sometimes present; postsutural dor socentrals always two;
setulae present on mesonotum in front of suture; scutellars black, two,
sometimes with two black and few white setulae; metapleurals pale yel-
lowish. Legs grey pollinose; coxal hairs pale yellowish; lower sides
of femora with pale bristles and pile; tibial and tarsal bristles black,
absent from ventral surfaces; claws brown, tips black; empodium black.
Wings hyaline, evenly covered with micr otrichiae; anterior crossvein
at basal one-third or half of the length of discal cell; anal cell closed.
Abdomen brownish pollinose basally, posterior one-third to half greyish
pollinose, extending forward on lateral margins, sides of first segment
with bristles and sparse pile; appressed setulae on all abdominal seg-
ments; male genitalia (figs. 175-179), black, yellowish grey pollinose;
hypandrial bristles convergent. Number and color of bristles and setulae,
and total length (6. 0 - 9. 0 mm) vary. In very rare cases, one or two
black bristles are present among white mystax.
This species is abundant along river banks, often re sting on rocks .
Red mites were found attached to the ventral side of the neck and behind
the hind coxae (membraneous parts) of a female specimen from Luscar,
Alberta (UA). Another species, Lasiopogon dnereus Cole, collected from
the same locality, was also found to have the same species of mites
associated with it. Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander in some localities, is
associated with L. dnereus Cole and L. quadrivittatus Jones. This species
has been recorded from Montana and Alberta; 148 specimens were ex-
14
Asilidae of Alberta
amined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Flatbush, Pembina River (UA); Edmonton, Emily Murphy Park
(UA), Beverly Municipal Dump (UA and LMK); Luscar, McLeod River (UA); Red Deer River,
Red Deer (UA and LMK); Drumheller (UA); Dinosaur Park (UA); Nordegg, North Saskatchewan
River Valley (UA and LMK); Crowsnest Forest, Dutch Creek (UA); Banff, Eisenhower lookout
(CNC).
Other localities - MONTANA: Gold Creek.
Lasiopogon quadrivittatus Jones
Lasiopogon quadrivittatus Jones 1907 : 278.
Among the species of Lasiopogon Loew occurring in Alberta, this is
the most easily recognized, for the bristles are all pale. In general
appearance it is similar to ripicola Melander, but the latter has black
scutellar bristles. Face and lower occiput gr ey pollinose; front vertex,
and upper occiput yellowish pollinosej bristle s and hair s pale yellowish.
Thorax golden yellow pollinose; dorsocentral vittae rusty brown, with
golden orange lining; acrostichal vittagrey or golden yellow; space be-
tween dorsocentral and acrostichal vittae brownish, giving appearance
of four vittae; six dor socentrals, two to three before suture; post-
humerals present or absent; presuturals two to three; intraalars two;
postalar s two; scutellars six; mesopleural and sternopleural pile white;
metapleural bristles five to eight. Legs light yellowish pollinose; middle
and hind pairs less pilose; hind femora with a row of bristles on anterior
sides; claws reddish brown basally, black apically; empodium black.
Wings hyaline, vein brownish; fourth posterior cell open, narrower or
wider than the first; anal cell closed. Abdomen grey pollinose; bristles
and pile pale yellowish; a pair of basal semicircular brownmarkings on
each, except fir st segment;, male genitalia black, golden yellow pollinose,
hairs and bristles pale yellowish; hypandrial bristles convergent; ovi-
positor black, yellowish pilose. Total length 7.0- 10. 0 mm inmales,
and 8.0- 11. 5 mm in females; number of metapleural and mesonotal
bristles exhibit variation.
In southern Alberta this species is common in late spring, but it
appears later in the northern parts of the province. It has been found
associated with Lasiopogon terricola Johnson, L. trivittatus Melander, L. cartus
Cole and Wilcox, Eucyrtopogon albibarbis Curran, and Asilus aridalis n. sp.
This species inhabits several different habitats: bare paths, along river
banks, and sand dunes near river . It ranges from Alberta and Wyoming,
east to Nebraska; 134 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Edmonton, Beverly Municipal Dump (UA and LMK), Country Club
(LMK), Emily Murphy Park (UA), White Mud Park (UA); Fabyan, Campsite (UA); Bind loss (UA);
Empress (UA); Sandy Point Bf-idge (UA); Army Expt. Sta. (UA); Medicine Hat (UA; CNC);
Seven Persons (UA); Burdett (UA); Pendant d'Oreille (UA); Writing- on-Stone Provincial Park
(UA); Milk River (CNC); Lethbridge (UA; CNC); Taber (UA) ; Dinosaur Park (UA) ; Drumheller
(UA); Calgary (CNC).
Other localities - MONTANA: "Montana, C.U.". WYOMING. nArASKA: Halsey War
Bonnet Canyon; Bad Lands; Mouth of Monroe Canyon. NORTH DAKOTA: Bismarck.
Adisoemarto
15
Lasiopogon ripicola Melander
Lasiopogon ripicola Melander 1923b : 143-144.
This species is similar to Lasiopogon quadrivittatus Jones, but is dis-
tinguished by the black color of the scutellar bristles; the male genitalia
are also different.
The presence of this species in Alberta is doubted, but it was in-
cluded by Strickland (1946) in his list. It ranges from Washington and
Idaho to California; seven specimens were examined.
Localities - WASHINGTON: Wayawai (CNC) ; Pasco (USNM); Cashmere. IDAHO: Lewiston.
OREGON: The Dalles.
Lasiopogon cinereus Cole
Lasiopogon cinereus Cole 1919 I 229.
This species is distinguished from the others by the following char-
acters: the black mystax, the wide grey bands on the abdominal posterior
sides, the shape of the superior forceps of the male genitalia (tapering
apically), and the entirely black ovipositor . Face grey pollinose, mystax
as long as antenna; front and vertex yellowish tinged; frontal and ver-
tical hairs weak; brownish transverse band across lateral ocelli; an-
tennae black, fir st two segments with black hairs. Thorax grey pollinose;
prothorax yellowish pilose; mesonotal hairs black, long; dorsocentral
bristles weak, two before suture, three to four behind suture; two to
three presuturals; posthumerals present or absent; humeri yellowish
tinged, black hairs present; mesopleuron with hairs on front half of
upper margin and posterior upper corner, pale yellow pile present on
posterior corner of sternopleur on; metapleural bristles black, mixed
with white pile; scutellum yellowish grey pollinose, bristles black. Legs
average for the genus, with long pale pile on lower sides of femora;
bristles black. Wings hyaline, slightly infuscated; halteres brownish.
Basal three-quarters of abdominal segments rusty brown pollinos^
apical one-fourth grey pollinose; long pale yellowish pile present on
lateral sides of first four of male and first two of female abdominal seg-
ments; last four segments of males and last five segments of females
with black setulae; bristles present on sides of first segment; venter
long yellowish pilose; male genitalia (figs. 180-184) black, superior
forceps yellowish grey pollinose, blackhaired; hypandrial bristles black,
convergent; ovipositor black, sparsely yellowish pilose, spines black.
This species has been found associated with Lasiopogon trivittatus
Melander. The adults are active, flying from rock to rock in the river,
or along river banks. It ranges from Alberta to California, east to Utah
and Colorado; 51 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Nordegg, North Saskatchewan River (LMK); Luscar, McLeod
River (UA); Red Deer (UA); Cr owsne st F or est , Wilkins on Creek (U A) , Dutch Creek (UA) ; Banff
(CNC); Frank (CNC); Waterton (CNC); Blakiston Brook, Waterton Park (UA).
Other localities - WASHINGTON: Blewett; Buckley; Cle Elum; Gaynor; Goldendale;
Kalama River; Lake Cushman, Mason Co. ; Mt. Rainier, Ipaut Creek Camp, Old White River
Entrance; Naches; Rainier National Forest, Indian Flat Camp, Lodgepole Camp; Satus Creek;
Virden; Walla Walla (CNC). OREGON: Mehama (AMNH); Hood River; Joseph; Lebanon;
16
Asilidae of Alberta
Wallowa Lake. CALIFORNIA; Tuolumne Meadows , Yosemite Park. MONTANA: edge of Mus sel-
shell River, Winnecook. WYOLIING: near Lander; Thumb Station, Yellowstone National Park.
UTAH; Uinta Mountains; Duchesne Mountain; Sheep Creek, Duchesne Co. COLORADO: Rock-
wood (USNAl).
Lasiopogon prima new species
This species is readily distinguished from the rest of the Albertan
species by the color of the mystax, which is mixed black and white. The
genitalia are also diagnostic of the species; the superior forceps (sur styli
of Cole) are provided with disc-like projections on the inner sides (fig.
187).
Male. Face greyish yellowpollinose; lower side of mystax white,
upper side black; front and vertex dull greyish yellow pollinose; fronto-
orbital hairs two rows; hairs in front of ocellar plate black, abundant;
ocellar bristles black; upper half of occiput dull greyish yellowpollinose,
lower half greyish pollinose; antennae black (fig. 119); hairs on first
two segments black; style half as long as third s egment; proboscis black,
palpus black, one-eighth as long as labium. Prothorax brownish grey
pollinose, white pilose; mesonotum greyish pollinose, dor socentral vittae
brown, acr ostichal vitta faint, ended at mesonotal suture, lateral meso-
notal margins brownish; hairs and bristles black; four left and three
right presuturals, one left and two right intraalars, one pair postalar,
six pair s presutural dor socentrals, three left and unidentified right post-
sutural dor soc 3ntrals ; scutellum black, greyish pollinose, eight bristles
black, mixed with black hairs; mesopleuron yellowish grey pollinose,
paler on lower side, black hairs on upper posterior corner; upper pos-
terior corner of sternopleur on whitish pilose; a row of eight metapleural
bristles black. Legs black, average for Lasiopogon Loew; pile on coxae,
on femora, and on tibiae white; left front femur with two, right front
femur with four bristles on dor soposterior surface, two bristles on mid-
dle pair, a row of six on left and five on right anterior side of hind fem-
ora; front and hind tibiae with three rows of four bristles on dorsal sur-
faces, middle pair with four rows; tibiae with nine to twelve apical bris-
tles; tarsal bristles arranged in circle subapically; claws brown basally,
black apically; pulvilli tawny, empodium black, as long as pulvilli.
Wings hyaline, evenly cover ed with microtrichiae, veins brown; anterior
crossvein at middle of discal cell; fourth posterior cell open, as wide
as first, fifth three times as wide as fourth; anal cell closed at margin
(fig. 148). Abdomen shining black, yellowish grey pollinose on apices,
extending forwa-»-'i at sides and middle, leaving a pair of black spots on
each segment; yellowish white pile on lateral sides of first four seg-
ments, semiappr es sed on the rest, venter grey pollinose, white pilose;
male genitalia black, hypandrial bristles black, convergent, superior
forceps broad basally, tapering apically, with disc-like projection on
ventral inner side (fig. 187).
Females. Except for the number and position of the bristles, fe-
males of this species are similar to the males; bristles on first ab-
dominal segment mixed with black; last four segments with setulae on
lateral sides; ovipositor black.
This species varies individually in the number of bristles, es-
Adisoemarto
17
pecially those on the‘‘mesonotum, the position of the anterior crossvein,
and the width of the fourth posterior cell. Total length is from 7.0 - 9.0
mm. The habitat is the same as that of the other species of Lasiupogon
Loew.
Holotype: male, Nordegg, North Saskatchewan River Valley,
Alberta, 28-V-1963 (Adisoemarto, Freitag, Ball, collectors); deposited
in CNC.
Paratypes: one male, three females, same data; male, female.
North Saskatchewan River, near Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, 29- V-
1963, same collectors; one male, three females. Garth, Alberta, same
collectors; male, Brazeau Dam, Lodgepole, Alberta, 9-VII-1964 (L.
M. Kenakin) . All these localities are on the eastern slopes of the Rocky
Mountains, in the vicinity of the North Saskatchewan River. Except the
last specimen, kept in LMK collection, the paratypes are deposited in
UA collection.
The name prima has been chosen, because this species was the first
asilid collected in 1963, on an expedition to the Rocky Mountains.
Lasiopogon canus Cole and Wilcox
Lasiopogon canus Cole and Wilcox 1938 : 32-34.
According to Cole and Wilcox (1938), this species in general ap-
pearance resembles European rather than North American members of
the genus . It is distinguished from the other species by the black mystax
and the narrow golden yellow abdominal bands. Face, front, and vertex
golden yellow pollinose; hair s and bristles black; hair s in front of ocellar
plate weak; antennae and hairs on first two segments black; occiput
golden yellow pollinose, paler toward chin, bristles black; beard yel-
lowish white. Thorax golden yellow pollinos e; dor socentral vittae brown,
not reaching humeri, acrostichal vitta faint, incomplete; bristles and
hairs entirely black. Legs golden yellow pollinose; coxae greyish pol-
linose; pile entirely golden yellow. Wings hyaline, brownish, covered
with microtrichiae; fourth posterior cell varies from closed to widely
open; anal cell closed with stalk. Abdomen black, slightly goldenyellow
pollinose, pile yellow; in some specimens, last three segments with
blcLck setulae on lateral sides; male genitalia shining black, superior
forceps broad basally, tapering apically, bristles black, conv'ergent on
hypandrium; ovipositor with orange valves, but comparatively shorter
and broader than those of aldrichi Melander. The bristles on the sides of
the first abdominal segment vary in number, from six to eight, and are
all black, or black mixed with white.
The species is found on barepaths or gravelly river banks. A few
specimens, which were probably just emerged, have the male genitalia
not completely inverted or still in uninverted situation. These specimens
are kept in UA. It is known from Alaska and Alberta; 32 specimens
were examined.
J-.ocali ti es - A LBER TA ; R ocky Mountain House, North Saskatchewan R iver (UA) ; Edmonton,
Whitemud Park (UA), Emily Murphy Park (UA), Country Club (LMK).
Other localities - ALASKA; Savonoski, Naknek Lake; Healy; Fairbanks.
18
Asilidae of Alberta
Lasiopogon hinei Cole and Wilcox
Lasiopogon hinei Cole and Wilcox 1938 : 51-53.
This species is recognized by the obscure abdominal pollen^, not
arranged as apical bands, and also by the long and dense pile on the ab-
domen of the males. Face, front, and vertex yellow pollinose; frontal
and vertical hairs long, black, abundant, continued to occiput; occiput
greyish pollinose; proboscis black, pile yellowish, palpus black, yellow-
ish pilose. Prothorax pale yellowish grey to golden yellow pollinose,
pile yellowish; mesonotum golden yellow pollinose, dorsocentral vittae
brownish to velvety black with golden yellow lining on inner sides, acros-
tichal vitta paler, greyish or golden yellow, incomplete, space between
dorsocentral and acrostichal vittae brownish; dorsocentral bristles
weak, varying from five to eight (two to three presutural, and three to
five postsutural) ; posthumerals present or absent; two to three pre-
suturals; two to three intraalars; two pairs of postalars; usually eight
scutellars, sometimes hardly distinguishable from hairs; metapleural
bristles eight to nine in a row, black, mixed with pale yellowish pile.
Legs golden yellow pollinose; numerous long black bristles present on
apical halves of femora and tibiae; claws brownish basally, black apically.
Wings hyaline, slightly infuscated; fourth posterior cell as wide or half
as wide as first; anal cell always closed, with stalk. Ground color of
abdomen black, pollen yellowish grey; long yellowish pile present on
first; anal cell always closed, with stalk. Ground color of abdomen
black, pollen yellowish grey; long yellowish pile present on first four
abdominal segments of males or first three of females, the rest seg-
ments with brownish black hairs; bristles on first abdominal segment
pale yellowish, on male genitalia black; hypandrium orange, bristles
convergent; ovipositor black, spines black, valves brownish orange.
The number of bristles on the mesonotum varies.
The adults of this species, in Alberta, have been found along bare
paths near streams or rivers with grasses or bushes next to them. It
is known from Alaska and Alberta; 14 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Flatbush, Pembina River (UA); Edmonton, R ainbow Valley (UA),
Whitemud Park (UA); Rocky Mountain House, North Saskatchewan River (UA).
Other localities - ALASK-V; Katmai.
Lasiopogon aldrichi Melander
Lasiopogon a/cfric/?/ Melander 1923b : 139-140.
The females of this species and of canus Cole and Wilcox have
orange valves of the ovipositor, but they are distinguished from one
another by shape. The males of this species ar e recognized by the shape
of the superior forceps. Slight variation occur s in the shape of the third
antennal segment (figs. 120, 121). The number of mesonotal bristles
varies . The fourth posterior cell varies from completely closed to widely
open. A female specimen from Drumheller (UA), Alberta, is slightly
different from the other specimens with respect to the shape of the ovi-
positor (fig. 107). This specimen might belong to Lasiopogon pacificus Cole
and Wilcox.
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta to Califor-
Adisoemarto
19
nia, east to Utah and Colorado; 48 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (UA and CNC); Drumheller (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC). OREGON: Mt. Hood (USHM);
Anthony Lake; Blue Mountains, Tollgate; Fish Lake, Steins Mts.; Haines; Strawberry Mt. ,
Grant Co. ; Sumpter; Wallowa Lake, Aneroid Lake Trail. WASHINGTON: Blue Mts. ; Signal
Peak; White Rock Springs, Steven Pass, Cascade Mts.; Mt. Spokane (USHM). IDAHO: Moscow
Mt. (CNC); Long Valley, Alpha. WYOMING. COLORADO: La Veta Pass. UTAH: Beaver
Creek. CALIFORNIA: Samoa (USNM).
Genus Stenopogon Loew
Stenopogon Loew 1847 : 483. Type species: Asilus sabaudus F. 1794.
Scleropogon Loew 1866 : 26. Type species: Scleropogon picticornis Loew 1866.
This genus contains robust species. Curran (1934) and Hull (1962)
considered this genus { sensu stricto) different from Scleropogon Loew, on the
basis of the absence of pile or hair s from the metapleur on. The definition
was thought by Bromley (1937) to be trivial; he (1951) treated Scleropogon
Loew as a synonym of Stenopogon Loew. Back (1909) was the first to con-
sider these two groups as congeneric.
Head slightly higher than wide; face, front, and vertex narrow;
gibbosity of two types: in ” inquinafus group" gibbosity very prominent,
starting close to antennal base (figs. 12, 13), in "coyote, group", gibbosity
starting farther away (fig. 11), third antennal segment tapers apically,
without obvious apical excavation (fig. 126); style tapers apically. Pro-
thorax with bristles, pile present among bristles and on anterior corner
of sternopleuron and posterior one-third of sternopleuron; bristles or
hairs present on, or absent from, metapleuron; mesonotal bristles more
abundant on posterior half. Legs pilose; front femora with bristles on
apices, middle pair with a row of bristles on anterior sides, hind pair
with two rows on anterior sides; tibiae with three or four rows of bris-
tles; tarsi with bristles subapically. Wings hyaline, axillary cell and
alula fuscous or smokey; second and third veins slightly recurved; an-
terior crossvein at, or slightly before, middle of discal cell; fourth
posterior cell open or closed; anal cell closed or narrowly open (figs.
150, 151). Abdomen more or less cylindrical, elongate, tapering api-
cally; male genital organ not inverted (fig. 93); ovipositor withacantho-
phorites and spines (figs. 89-92).
According to the definition of the genus Ospriocerus Loew by Martin
(pers. comm.), consanguineus Loew and pumilus Coquillett belong to that
genus, not to Stenopogon Loew.
There are five species in Alberta: obscmiventris Loew, rufibarbis
Bromley, inquinatus Loew, coyote Bromley, and neglectus Bromley, but
Strickland (1938 and 1946) included also gratus Loew in his lists.
Key to the Species oi Stenopogon Loew of Alberta
1. Metapleuron with hairs, or with weak or strong bristles 2
Metapleuron without hairs or bristles, at most tomentose or pol-
linose 3
Wings with first and fourth, posterior cells open; abdomen black-
2.
20
Asilidae of Alberta
3.
4.
5.
6 .
ish or less pollinose; first antennal segment blackish
neglectus Bromley
First posterior cell narrow at tip or sometimes closed with stalk
(figs. 150, 151); fourth posterior cell closed with stalk; ab-
domen greenish grey pollinose; first antennal segment brownish
orange coyote Bromley
Abdominal dorsum uniformly black 4
Abdominal dorsum reddish brown, black only on sides 6
Humeri orange brown inquinatus Loew
Humeri black 5
Evenly greyish pollinose species; pile and bristles yellow
obscuriventris Loew
Darker, bright orange pollinose; pile and bristles bright orange.
rufiharbis Bromley
Humeri orange-brown, covered withgreyish pollen, inquinatus Lioew
Humeri black, covered with yellowish orange pollen. . gratus Loew
Stenopogon obscuriventris Loew
Stenopogon obscuriventris hioew 1872 : 30.
This species is easily recognized by the uniform greyish pollen
and yellow bristles and pile. Back (1909) treated this species as con-
specific with californiae Walker. Antennal segments unicolored; style
orange brown apically; palpal segments equal (fig. 42); gibbosity almost
touching antennal base (fig. 12). Thorax unicolored; prothorax with
bristles only on pronotum; presutural dor socentrals absent; humerals
absent; dorsocentral vittae blackish brown; pile on anterior corner and
posterior half of sternopleur on long. Coxae and basal three-fourths of
femora black, the rest yellowish; claws brownish ba sally, black apically.
Wings hyaline, veins brownish; in males, axillary cell and alula tinged
silvery white, less obviously so in females; all posterior cells open;
anal cell opennarrowly or almost closed. Abdomen unicolored; pile on
first three segments long; male genitalia (figs. 194-198) and ovipositor
orange brown. Number of bristles varies. Sexual dimorphismis shown
only by the white infuscation on the wings of the males.
This species ranges from Alberta andColorado, west to California;
23 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Czar (UA); Medictne Hat (CNC); Lethbridge (CNC).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Pike Lake; Great Sand Hills, west of Swift Current.
OREGON; Summer Lake; Chewaucan R., near Paisley. IDAHO: Victor (AMNH); Giveout
(AMNH); Mt. Pelier (AMNH). WYOMING: Jackson (AMNH); Rawlins (AMNH); Green River
(AMNH); Medicine Bow (AMNH); Carbon (AMNH); Rock Spring (AMNH); Centenial (AMNH).
UTAH: Promontory Point (USNM); Huntsville (USNM); Logan Canyon (USNM). COLORADO:
Animas (AMNH); Monte Vista (AMNH); Ouray (AMNH); Jefferson (AMNH); Blanca (USNM).
ARIAONA: Kaibab Forest, Grand Canyon. CALIFORNIA: Mone Lake (AMNH); Mariposa Co.
(A.MNH); Mount Diablo (AMNH); Mt. Hamilton (AMNH).
Stenopogon rufibarbis Bromley
Stenopogon rufibarbis Bromley 1931 : 431.
Adisoemarto
21
This species is very similar to obscuriventris Loew. The male geni-
talia (figs. 199-203) and the ovipositors of these two species are very
slightly different from one another . The two species may be distinguished
by the different color of pollen, pile, and bristles.
This species ranges from British Columbia to Arizona, and east
to Utah. Strickland (1938) included this species in his list, but the record
was based on misidentified specimens of Stenopogon obscvriventris Loew. It
probably does not occur in Alberta; 31 specimens were examined.
Localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Osoyoos; Anderson Lake; Seton Lake; Oliver.
WASHINGTON. OREGON: Cherry Creek, Klamath Lake; Alberta Lake. IDAHO: Giveout
(AMNH). CALIFORNIA: Keddi Plumas Co. (AiVINH) ; Sierra Nevada (AMNH) ; Coleville (AMNH) ;
Philo Mendocino (AMNH); Mt. Hamilton (AMNH); Feather River (AMNH); Butte Co. (AMNH);
Cedar ville (AMNH) ; CTioPlumas Co. (AMNH); Lassen Co.; San Antonio, Ontario; LosAngeles;
Pasadena; Lake of W'oods; Echo Portals, Eldorado Co. UTAH: St. George (AMNH) . ARIZONA:
Lacobs I.ake.
Stenopogon grains Loew
Stenopogon grains Ljoew 1872 : 31.
Stenopogon nnivittatns ~LiOew 1874 : 358.
This species is similar to californiae Walker, but can be distinguished
by the mesonotal vestiture and the color of the pile and bristles. The
bristles and pile are orange, darker than those of californiae Loew, and
the mesonotum is provided with longer dorsocentral black hairs. The
male genitalia are also differ ent in the shape of the hypandrium and of the
superior forceps (figs. 204-217).
This species is known from California only, but Strickland (1938)
included it in his list; two specimens were examined.
Localities - CALIFORNIA: San Francisco (USNM).
Stenopogon inqninatns Loew
Stenopogon inqninatns ]_,oeV\/ 1866 : 47.
Stenopogon modestns Loew 1866 : 46.
Stenopogon morosns Loew 1874 : 356.
This species is distinguished from grains Loew, by the reddish
brown humeri. There are two forms: one with reddish brown abdomen,
the other with black abdomen.
Brown form: front and vertex greyish yellow pollinose; gibbosity
very prominent (fig. 13); antennae brownish or reddish black; proboscis
and palpi black. Thoracic ground color black, humeri reddish brown;
pollen greyish yellow; prothorax pilose, pronotum and episternum with
bristles; dorsocentral vittae brownish black; presutural dorsocentral
bristles absent; metapleuron bare; scutellum reddish brown with black
posterior edge. Coxae and dor sal sides of femora black, the rest reddish
brown; basal one third of claws reddish brown, the rest black. Wings
hyaline, s emi - infuscated; posterior cells open; anterior crossvein
slightly before, or at the middle of discal cell. Abdomen reddish brown
on the middle, black on lateral sides; venter black; pile long on sides
of first two segments, shorter and sparser on the following segments;
22
Asilidae of Alberta
ventral pile long; male genitalia orange brown with black hairs; apical
end of eighth segment of females with lateral pits submarginally (fig.
91); acanthophorite orange brown, spines black.
Black form: this differ s only in the coloration. Trochanter s black,
femora black with reddish brown apices; femoral bristles black; ab-
domen black, eighth segment in both sexes reddish brown with apical
black band; male genitalia the same as those in brown form; acantho-
phorites reddish brown, spines black.
In addition to these forms, there is also intermediate form, with
broad lateral sides of abdomen black and narrow middle part reddish
brown.
In Colorado, this species inhabits wheat grassland (James 1938).
In Alberta, it has been collected in various habitats, such as in grassland
of long grass, in semi-arid prairie grassland, on gravelly river banks,
in sand pits, at the edge of, or in the openings in the coniferous forests.
It has been found associated with Asilus callidus Williston. This species
has been recorded from British Columbia eastward to Minnesota, and
south to Arizona; 143 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Peace River (UA); Lac la Biche (UA and LMK); Opal-Coronado
(UA and LMK); Celestine Lake, Jasper National Park; Jasper (CNC); Nordegg, North Saskat-
chewan Valley (UA); Seebe (DE); Banff (UA and CNC); Gorge Creek (UA); Redrock Canyon,
Waterton Lakes Park (UA); Calgary (UA); Lethbridge (CNC); Bow River (CNC); Orion (UA);
Medicine Hat (UA); Steveville- Wardlow (UA); Consort (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Vernon; Nicola Valley; Lillooet (CNC); Aspen
Groove (CNC); Seton Lake (CNC). SASKATCHEWAN; Pike Lake (CNC). MANITOBA: Aweme
(CNC). MINNESOTA: R ed R iver of the North. IDAHO: Victor (AMNH); Giveout (AMNH) ; Mt.
Pelior (AMNH). WYOMING: Jackson (AMNH); Rawlins (AMNH); R ock Springs (AMNH) . NEB-
RASKA: Glen, Sioux Co. ; Spring View Bridge, Point Co. ; West Point. COLORADO: Walsenburg
(AMNH); Monte Vista (AMNH); Alamosa (AMNH); Cochetopa National Forest (AMNH). UTAH;
Hatch (AMNH). ARIZONA: N. Rim Grand Canyon (AMNH); Oracle (AMNH). CALIFORNIA:
Benton (AMNH); Clio Plumas Co. (AMNH).
Stenopogon neglectus Bromley
Stenopogon neglectus Bromley 1931 : 430.
Sc/eropo^on neg/eefus Hull 1962 : 126.
This species is readily recognized by the presence of hairs on the
metapleuron, Stenopogon coyote Bromley has also hairs on the metapleur on,
but the two species are readily distinguished by the differ ence in the wing
venation. The male genitalia are also different (figs. 213-217). In
neglectus Bromley, the superior forceps and the gonopods vary from red-
dish brown to black.
The habitats of this species are mainly pastures, wheat grass of
the grassland (James 1938), long grass prairie, and semi-arid short
grass prairie. It ranges from Alberta to Arizona; 19 specimens were
examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA); Comrey, Milk River Valley (UA).
Other localities - OREGON: Castle. IDAHO: Lewiston. WYOMING: Lander; Jackson
(AMNH); Carbon Co. (AMNH). COLORADO: Creeds. UTAH: Ac. SL. Dsrt. NEVADA: Fallon
(AMNH). ARIZONA: White Mts. (AMNH).
Adisoemarto
23
Stenopogon coyote Bromley
Stenopogon -coyote Bromley 1931 : 42 9.
This species is similar to neglectus Bromley in having the meta-
pleural hairs, but it is easily distinguished by the wing venation. The
first posterior cell is always narrower apically, and the fourth posterior
cell is always closed with long stalk (figs. 150, 151). The habitat is
similar to that of neglectus Bromley. It ranges from Alberta to Arizona
and New Mexico; 47 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Drumheller (UA and CNC); Steveville- Wardlow (UA); Dinosaur
Trail, Dinosaur Provincial Park (UA); Lake Newell, Kinbrook Island Park (UA); Brooks (CNC);
Medicine Hat (UA); Orion (UA); Writing-on-Stone Park (UA); Conirey, Milk R iver Valley (UA);
Lethbridge (CNC).
Other localities - WYOMING: Lander; Lusk. SOUTH DAKOTA: Custer (USNM) ; Piedmont,
Nowlin Co. (USNM). COLORADO: Walsenburg (CNC); Salida; Poncha Spring; Colorado City.
ARIZONA.
Genus Ospriocerus Loew
Ospriocerus Loew 1866 : 29. Type species: Asilus abdominalis S^y 1823.
This genus is known only from the New World. It is very similar
to Stenopogon Loew, but readily distinguished by the third segment of the
antenna, which has a pit or excavation on the apical lower side (figs.
123, 125). There are three types of style in this genus (Martin pers.
comm.): the hidden type with a spine inside ( Ospriocerus abdominalis Say) ;
the short type with apical pit and spine inside ( Ospriocerus latipennis Loew);
and the Mexican type. The second type of style is like that of Neoscleropogon
Malloch, as described and illustrated by Hull (1962). Most of the char-
acters are like those of Stenopogon Loew; gibbosity not prominent (fig. 10);
metapleuron with hair s; wings broad, fourth posterior cell always closed.
In Alberta, there are two species, Ospriocerus abdominalis Say and
O. consanguineus Loew, but another species, pumilus Coquillett was also in-
cluded by Strickland (1938), probably on the basis of misidentified speci-
mens; two male specimens of Stenopogon coyote Bromley were labelled as
Stenopogon pumilus Coquillett by Curran and Strickland.
Key to the Species of Ospriocerus Loew of Alberta
First antennal segment four times as long as second; style hidden
(fig. 124) abdominalis Say
First antennal segment at most twice as long as second; style
short, with apical pit (figs. 122, 123)
consanguineus Loew and pumilus Coquillett’’'
Ospriocerus abdominalis Say
Asilus abdominalis Ssiy 1823 : 375.
Dasypogon aeacus Wiedemann 1823 : 390.
’•'These two species are hardly distinguishable; they are possibly conspecific.
24
Asilidae of Alberta
Dasypogon spatullatus'Bell3iTdi 1861 : 82.
Ospriocerus ae&cides Loew 1866 : 51.
Ospriocerus abdominalis Coquillett 1898 : 37.
Ospriocerus ventralis Coquillett 1898 : 37.
This species is easily distinguished from the other two by the color
of the abdomen and the wings . Coquillett (1898) distinguished ventralis from
abdominalis Say on the basis of the color of the venter of abdomen, orange
in the former and black in the latter. Head, thorax, legs, and all bris-
tles, and pile black; antennae black, style cryptic; second segment of
palpus spindle-shaped. Wings broad, purplish, infuscated. Abdomen
mostly orange, with first and basal half of second segment black, in
some females lateral mar gins of each segment black; eighth segment of
females black, sixth and seventh segments of some females black; venter
black, orange, or'black and orange; male genitalia and female acantho-
phorites black.
This species has been recorded from the Northwest Territories to
Arizona and Texas, east to Pennsylvania; 24 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA); Chin, prairie coulee (UA).
Other localities - NORTHWEST TERRITORIES. BRITISH COLUMBIA: Oliver (CNC).
SASKATCHEWAN; Roche Percee (CNC). NORTH DAKOTA: Beach (CNC). WYOMING: Carbon
Co. (AMNH); Jackson (AMNH). UTAH: Stockton (CNC); Howel, Dolemite (CNC); Moab, Grand
Co. COLORADO: Mesa Verde (AMNH): Pagosa Spring (AMNH) : Palisade (AMNH) ; Fort Collins;
Colorado Springs ; Spaniard Peak. NEBRASKA: Sioux Co. KANSAS: Golden City. OKLAHOMA:
Optima (AMNH) : W'ichita National Forest (CNC). TEXAS: Travis Co. (AMNH); Austin (AMNH);
Round Mts. NEW MEXICO: Cortez; White's City, Eddy Co. ARIZONA; Carr Canyon, Huachuca
Mts., Cochise Co. ; ’Wilcox (AMNH); Tucson (AMNH). CALIFORNIA. IDAHO: Snake Co.
MONTANA: Lombard. WASHINGTON: Squaw Creek.
Ospriocerus consanguineus Loew
Stenopogon consanguineus Loew 1866 : 48.
Stenopogon latipennisl^oevi/ 1866 : 49.
Ospriocerus consanguineus Martin, pers. comm.
Specimens of this species are easily distinguished from abdominalis
Say by the size of the antennae, coloration, and wing venation. Abdominal
segments greyish pollinose; pile yellowish, longer on lateral sides of
first segment; male genitalia and ovipositor orange brown; gonopods of
male genitalia with hair lamellae subapically (fig. 190),
James (1938) recorded this species from moist sedge meadows,
arid mixed and bunch grassland, and tall weed wasteland, where natural
vegetation has been disturbed. It ranges from Alberta to Manitoba, and
south to Texas; 16 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Medicine Hat (UA).
Other localities - MANITOBA: Onah (CNC). SOUTH DAKOTA: Sioux Co. WYOMING:
Douglas (AMNH)., NEBRASKA: Pierre; Chandron; Agate (CNC). COLORADO: Boulder (AMNH) ;
La Junta (AMNH); Regnier; Wray; Rocky Ford; Roggen; Denver. NEW MEXICO: San Jon
(AMNH). OKLAHOMA: Greer Co.; Chickasha. TEXAS: Dallas.
Ospriocerus pumilus Coquillet
Stenopogon pumilus Coquillett 1904 : 33.
Adisoemarto
25
Scleropogon pumilus Hull 1962 : 126.
Ospriocerus pumilus Martin, pers. comm.
This species is strikingly similar to consapguineus Loewand may be
conspecific. The male genitalia of the two are not different.
This species is known from Texas and Kansas. Strickland (1938)
included it in his list, but this was probably based on misidentified speci-
mens; five specimens were examined.
Localities - K.-XNSAS: Clarke Co.; Ellis Co. (USNM). TEXAS: Brownsville (USNM); Spur
(USXM); Hidalgo Co. (USNM).
Genus Holopogon Loew
HolopopogonLioew 1847:473. Type species: Dasypogon nigripennis Meigen 1820.
Podoctria Megerle (Ms) in Meigen 1820 : 279. N omen nudum .
Ceraturgus Rondani, not Wiedemann 1856 : 156.
The species of this genus are small, 4. 5 - 9. 0 mm, mostly black
with long curly pile. In the United States and Canada, 17 species have
been described (Martin 1959). They are grouped into two subgenera:
three in Dasyholopogon Martin, and the rest in the subgenus Holopogon Loew.
The species of the subgenus Holopogon Loeware very similar to one another;
the male genitalia are non-diagnostic, and most of the remaining char-
acters are relative and variable. Because of this, Martin grouped the
species into four species complexes: seniculus complex, acropennis complex,
phaenotus-oriens complex, and guttula complex. Further, he stated that the
taxonomic status of these complexes is not certain. They may be indeed
more than one species, two or more subspecies, or each may be a single
highly variable species.
Head broad and short (figs. 16, 17); face broad and flat; front
slightly narrower at antennal base, with depression in front of ocellar
plate; the latter elevated, more or less rounded; front with lateral pro-
tuberance; antennae black, first two segments equal, third elongate,
tapering apically, style with two micros egments (fig. 137), the first very
small; palpi two segmented; face, front, and vertex pilose and pollinose.
Thoracic ground color black; pleura white pollinose; presutural meso-
notum, except dorsocentral vittae and posterior inner quarter, white
pollinose, the r est of mesonotum and scutellum black; pile on prothorax,
mesopleuron, anterior and posterior corners of sternopleuron, meta-
pleuron, and mesonotum and scutellum, long, sometimes shorter on
mesonotum; lower slope of metanotum golden yellow tomentose; bristles
weak, hardly distinguishable from pile. Legs black; coxae greyish pol-
linose, with long pile on anterior sides of front, and lateral sides of
middle and hind pairs; femora stout, with pile; hind tibiae club-shaped,
ventral sides of front and hind tibiae golden yellow tomentose; ventral
sides of tarsi golden yellow tomentose, hind basitarsi swollen; claws
curved, empodium short. Wings hyaline, alula small; venation varies
slightly within the species; fifth vein slightly curved anteriorad; bran-
ching of third vein at or slightly beyond the tip of discal cell; marginal,
submarginal, and posterior cells open; anal cell closed, with or without
stalk, in some others open (Hull 1962). Abdomen pilose laterally, more
26
Asilidae of Alberta
or les s shining dor sally; venter pilose; bristles absent, or undetectable;
male genitalia short, reddish, partly rotated (90°); gonopods with arms
and spine-like process (fig. 220); clasper also spine-like; ovipositor
reddish, acanthophorites with four to five pair s of spines . The coloration
of the pile shows sexual dimorphism.
Three species are present in Alberta: albipilosa Curran, seniculus
Loew, and nignpi/osa new species . All three species belong to the subgenus
Holopogon Lioew.
Key to the Species of Holopogon Loew of Alberta
1. Wipg veins yellow seniculus Loew
Wing veins brown 2
2. Pile on mesonotum and scutellum white albipilosa Curran
Pile on posterior mesonotum and scutellum black
• nigripilosa new species
Holopogon albipilosa Curran
Holopogon albipilosusCuTTSin 1923 : 207.
This species shows sexual dimorphism in the coloration of the
pile. The pile on the front and the vertex is black in the males, white in
the females; the mystax is black with few white hairs in the males,
white with one or two black hairs in the females; the antennal hairs are
black in the males, white in the females; the rest of the pile is brownish
in the males and white in the females.
This species ranges from British Columbia to Manitoba, south to
Nevada and Wyoming; holotype, allotype, and 19 additional specimens
were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Wainwright (UA); Drumheller (UA) ; Medicine Hat (UA and CNC);
Orion (UA); Lethbridge (CNC); Oldman River, Lethbridge (CNC); Picture Butte (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Vernon (type locality : CNC); Chilcotin (CNC).
SASKATCHEWAN: Saskatoon (CNC); Saskatchewan Landing (CNC). MANITOBA. IDAHO;
Montpelier (AMNH) . WYOMING; Carbon Co. (AMNH); Green River (AMNH); Jackson (AMNH);
near Lander (AMNH). NEVADA.
Holopogon seniculus Loew
Holopogon seniculus LiOew 1862 : 62.
This species is readily distinguished from the others by the yellow
wing veins. The pile is long, white in the males and yellowish in the
females.
This species is known from Alberta and Saskatchewan, south to
Colorado, and west to Nevada; 10 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Scandia (CNC); Medicine Hat (CNC); Lethbridge (CNC).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Saskatoon (CNC). WYOMING. NEBRASKA; Chandron
(WSU). COLORADO; Lamar (AMNH). NEVADA.
Adi soemarto
27
Holopogon nigripilosa new species
This species is easily distinguished from albipilosa Curran and
seniculus Loew by the color of the mystax, which is black in females, and
the black pile on the posterior mesonotum and on the scutellum. It is
described from three female specimens. Length: 8. 0 mm.
Female. Face, front and vertex, pale golden yellowish pollinose;
pile on vertex, front, and ocellar triangle golden yellow, mixed with
black on frontal protuberance; mystax black, pale golden yellowish pile
present along lateral margins of face; antennae black, with black hairs
on first two segments; occiput black, lower half golden yellowish pol-
linose, bristles and hairs on upper part black; pile on lower half of
occiput, on proboscis and palpi, and beard, white. Prothorax yellowish
white pollinose and pilose, middle pronotum brownish tomentose; dorso-
central vittae brown; humeri, anterior lateral margins of mesonotum,
white pollinose, the rest of mesonotum brownish tomentose; white pile
present on anterior one fourth of mesonotum, anterior lateral margins,
to sutures, the rest of mesonotal pile black; scutellum brownish tomen-
tose, black pilose; mesopleuron brownish pollinose, paler on anterior
half, white pilose; metanotum brownish pollinose. Coxae greyish brown
pollinose, white pilose; femora, and front and middle tibiae white pilose,
hind tibiae with black hairs; bristles on tibiae and tarsi black; claws,
basal half reddish brown, black apically. Wings hyaline, micr otrichiae
brownish, veins brown; venation of average Holopogon Loew (fig. 152),
anal cell closed with stalk. Abdomen shining black with lateral sides of
first two segments yellowish brown pollinose; pile white, longer on
sides of first two segments, shorter on succeeding s egments , very short
and sparse on dorsum; ventral pile long, white; acanthophorites black,
with four black spines.
This species is called nigripilosa , because of the black mesonotal
and scutellar pile, which distinguishes this species from the other two
species from Alberta.
This species was collected from a glade in a conifer ous for est, with
short grass and herbs.
Holotype: female, Opal-Coronado, Alberta, 5. VII. 1963 (L, Kenakin
and S. Adisoemarto); deposited in CNC.
Paratypes: same data; deposited in UA.
Genus Heteropogon Loew
Heferopogon Ljoew 1847 : 488. Type species: Dasypogon manicatus IsAeigenlSZO .
Anisopogon Loew 1874 : 377.
The name Anisopogon Loew was used as a substitute for Heteropogon
Loew, the latter name having been used for a plant (Back 1919). How-
ever, Anisopogon Loew was used by Hull (1962) for the second subgenus of
Heteropogon Loew.
Head wide and flat or short; face and occiput pilose; pile similar
to "plume"; first two antennal segments equal, third segment tapering
apically, one and half times as long as first two segments together (fig.
28
Asilidae of Alberta
150); style two- segmented, the first segment small. Thorax with more
or less rounded mesonotum; anterior mesonotum and mesopleuron pilose;
humerals, presuturals, intraalar s, dor socentrals, postalars, andscutel-
lars present. Legs slender; coxae pilose; bristles present on anterior
sides of femora, several rows on tibiae, subapically on tarsi; basitarsi
long, at least twice as long as second segment; ventral sides of tarsi
setulate. Wings hyaline, partly smokey or diffusedly maculate (fig. 153);
venation normal, all posterior cells open, anal cell open very narrowly
apically or closed, alula present. Basal abdomen as broad as thorax,
tapering apically to one third basal width; male genitalia shiny dor sally,
more or less pointing downward (figs. 222-225).
Coquillett (1893a) and Wilcox (1941) gave synopses of the species
of Heteropogon Loew of North America north of Mexico. A single species,
Heteropogon wilcoxi James, is known from Alberta.
Heteropogon wilcoxi James
Heteropogon wilcoxi James 1934 : 84.
Mystax, frontal and vertical pile, and beard, white; four ocellar s
white; antennae black, one bristle on apical lower side of second anten-
nal segment white; occiput black, white pilose, bristles white; palpi
two- segmented, subequal, first segment excavated laterally (fig. 45).
Thorax greyish yellow pollinose; prothoracic pile long; mesonotal pile
present marginally, dor socentrally and acr ostichally; long pile also
present on anterior and posterior corners of sternopleur on, on meso-
pleuron, on metapleuron, and on upper center of hypopleuron. Coxae
and femora black, tibiae and tar si yellow to or ange br own; coxae yellow-
ish pollinose with long white pile; femora with pile on ventral sides,
bristles on basal ventral and apical posterior sides of front, and anterior
sides and apices of middle and hind pairs; ventral sides of front and
hind tibiae, and tarsi, golden yellow tomentose; claws strong, curved,
black; empodium short, brown. Wings slightly longer than abdomen,
veins brown; anal cell open narrowly; branching of third vein above tip
of discal cell; anterior crossvein behind the middle of discal cell (fig.
153).
Abdomen yellowish grey pollinose; white pile present on lateral
margins, shorter on posterior segments; dorsum covered with short,
sparse pile; ventre white pilose; last three segments of female shining
black, acanthophorites black, bearing five pairs of black spines; male
genitalia shining brownish orange (figs. 222-225).
This species ranges from Alberta to Arizona; seven specimens
were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Lethbridge (UA and CNC).
Other localities - WYOMING. COLORADO: Model, Hochne; Mesa de Maya, Tobe; Sprin-
ger. ARIZONA: Holbrook. ILLINOIS: Joliet.
Adisoemarto
29
Genus Lestomyia Willi ston
Lestomyia Williston 1884 : 19. Type species: Clavator sabulonum Osten-
Sacken 1877.
Clavator Osten-Sacken not Philippi 1877 : 391.
In appearance, these flies resemble Lasiopogon Loew, but are dis-
tinct in the antennae and some other characters, such as the vertex, the
front, the gibbosity, and the presence of a bent tibial spur on front tibiae.
Male genitalia are rotated about 90°; hypandrium subtriangular ; aedeagus
long; superior forceps more or less like those of Heteropogon Loew (fig. 58).
Face broad, gibbosity not too prominent; front and vertex convex
marginally, ocellar plate elevated, rounded; first two antennal s egments
subequal, third swollen apically, style single segmented, truncate, hollow
on tip (fig. 128); palpi two- segmented. Thorax with strong bristles,
markedly pollinose, less pilose. Legs slender; pile short, appressed;
bristles stout, mostly on tibiae and tarsi; claws long; empodium two
thirds as long as claws, sharp. Wings hyaline, all posterior cells open,
anal cell open narrowly; branching of third vein above or beyond tip of
discal cell; anterior crossvein slightly beyond middle of discal cell;
alula well developed (fig. 154). Abdomen elongate, pile short and semi-
appressed, longer on first segment; bristles present on sides of first
segment. Seven species are included in this genus, all Nearctic in dis-
tribution. In Alberta this genus is represented by one species, Lestomyia
sabulonum Osten-Sacken.
Lestomyia sabulonum Osten-Sacken
C/avator sa6u/onum Osten-Sacken 1877 : 392.
Lestomyia sabulonum Williston 1884 : 20.
This species is yellowish grey pollinose; all bristles are white.
Size 7.0- 11. 0 mm in males, 8. 0 - 12. 0 mm in females. There is no
sexual dimorphism. The number of bristles varies individually; the
ocellar bristles three to four pairs; metapleural bristles in a row of
four to six; humerals three to four; post-humerals none to two; intra-
alars two to three; dor socentrals eight to ten; scutellars three to four
pairs .
This species lives in mainly dry fields, with short grass and cacti,
near to, or far from, water.
This species is known from British Columbia and Alberta, south
to California, east to Wyoming; 35 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Burdett (UA); Medicine Hat (UA); Comrey, Milk River Valley
(UA); Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park (UA); Little Bow Park, McGregor Lake (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Oliver (CNC). CALIFORNIA: Claremont (CNC).
WYOMING: Rawlins (AMNH) .
Genus Nicocles Jaennicke
A^jcoc/es Jaennicke 1867:355. Type species: Nicocles analis Jaennicke 1867 .
Pygostolus Loew 1866 : not Haliday 1833. Type species: Dasypogon politus Say
1823.
30
Asilidae of Alberta
This group includes flies with rather flat abdomens. The head is
similar to Heteropogon Loew and Lestomyia Willi ston, but the shapes of the
antennae (fig. 129) and the mystax (figs. 20-22) readily distinguish the
two groups. The humeral bristles are absent from Nicocles Jaennicke.
Face flat, bristles present along epistomal margin; first two an-
tennal segments subequal, third segment tapering apically, bristles
present on lower side of second segment; vertex and front broad, semi-
parallel (fig. 22); proboscis short; palpi two- segmented, subequal (fig.
44). Thorax with bristles on posterior half of mesonotum; humerals
absent; presuturals present; metapleur on with bristle-like hair s . Legs
slender; bristles present on middle femora, on tibiae, and on tarsi;
front and hind basitarsi twice as long as second tarsal segments (figs.
7 5, 76). Wings longer than abdomen, maculate in some species; discal
cell elongate; third vein branch above or beyond tip of discal cell; an-
terior crossvein at apical two-thirds of discal cell; all posterior cells
open except anal cell narrowly open at tip or closed; alula not well deve-
loped. Abdomen shiny and rather flat (figs. 94-96). In males: seventh
segment concealed under broader sixth segment; male genitalia small,
notrotated, concealed under sixth abdominal s egment. Infemales: eighth
segment concealed inside seventh segment; acanthophorites with five
pairs of spines.
This genus is represented in the Neotropical R egion by one species,
and in the Nearctic Region by 14 species. One species, Nicocles utahensis
Banks, occurs in Alberta.
Nicocles utahensis Banks
Nicocles utahensis 'Ba.nks 1920 : 66-67.
Nicocles punctipennis 'bAelandev 1923c : 217-219.
This species is easily recognized by the shiny black abdomen and
incomplete silvery white marking on the fifth segment of males and fe-
males. The silvery markings differ between the sexes. In the males,
the marking on the fifth abdominal segment is incomplete, interrupted
medially, broader laterally, and on the sixth segment, the marking is
entire (fig. 94). In the females, the markings are present on the last
three segments, broad on the lateral margins, tapering, and separated
by a small gap medially (fig. 96).
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta, south to
Oregon and Utah.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC).
Genus Cyrtopogon Loew
Cyrtopogon Lioew 1847 : 516. Type species: Asilus ruficornis F. 1794.
Euarmosf us Walker 1851 : 102. Type species: Euarmostus bimacula Walker
1851.
Eupa/amus Jaennicke 1867 : 86. Type species; Eupalamus alpestris Jaennicke
Adisoemarto
31
1867. Preoccupied in Hymenoptera, Wesmael 1844, andinCole-
optera, Schmidt- Goebel 1846.
Palamopogon Bezzi 1927 : 61. Type species: Palamopogon alpestris Jaennicke
1867.
Philammosius Rondani 1856 : 156. Type species: Dasypogon fimbriatus Meigen
1820.
Wilcox and Martin (1936) included 68 species in this genus. The
species were arranged in 21 groups and five "single" species: falto
Walker, laphriformis Curran, lyratus Osten-Sacken, alleni Back, and tenuis
Bromley.
This genus seems to be the most successful group in North America
north of Mexico; so far it has not been reported from Mexico (Wilcox
and Martin 1936). Twenty three species have been reported from the
Palaearctic, two from the Ethiopian, and three from the Oriental Region
(Hull 1962). There are 14 species known from Alberta.
There are many characters for the identification of the species,
depending on the group, such as shape, color, and ornamentation of the
tarsi; ornamentation of abdomen; markings on the wings; shape of the
mystax; the scutellum; the metapleura; the legs; the claws; the gib-
bosity and width of the face; and the antennae (Wilcox and Martin 1936).
Back (1909) noticed that some species were aberrant forms of the
genus; these were placed in different genera; Eucyrtopogon by Curran
(1923), Metapogon by Coquillett ( 1904) ; Nannocyrtopogon byWilcoxand Martin
(1936).
Most species live inareas near or within coniferous forests. Other
known habitats are: sand near willows along running water, and open
desert. Limited data on the phenology and mating behaviour of some of
the species were presented by Wilcox and Martin (1936). Melin (1923)
provided information on the biology of the Palearctic species, Cyrtopogon
lateralis Fallen.
See Wilcox and Martin (1936) for the description of the genus.
Key to the Species of Cyrtopogon Loew of Alberta
1. Last segment of front tarsus elongate, as long as three proceeding
segments together, flattened (fig. 81); fir st abdominal segment
with a posterior pollinose fascia . Hneotarsus Curran
Fore tarsus with subequal segments; first abdominal segment with-
out a posterior pollinose fascia 2
2. Hind tibiae entirely black 3
Hind tibiae entirely or partly reddish or orange brown 6
3. Mystax entirely black; tibial pile short 4
Mystax with white or yellow pile; tibial pile long, black or mixed
with white 5
4. Tibial pile in both sexes black; hairs of male genitalia black. . ..
nigator Osten-Sacken
Tibial pile white; hairs of male genitalia white .... sansoni Curran
5. Silvery hairs on segments 1 to 5 of male front tar sus not noticeably
longer apically; first two abdominal segments with yellow hairs;
32
Asilidae of Alberta
hind femora yellowish haired praepes Williston
Silvery hairs on segments 2 to 5 of male front tarsus longer api-
cally; more than two basal abdominal segments with pale yellow
hairs; hind femora with black hairs . . wilUstoni Curran
6. Abdomen with dense, erect, light colored pile, covering at least
the dorsum of abdominal segments 2 and 3. . . . c/asy//is Williston
Pile of abdomen not as above 7
7. Hind tibia with long white pile montanus Loew
Hind tibia without such long pile 8
8. Metapleural bristles entirely black 9
Metapleural bristles mixed with orange, or entirely orange or
pale yellow 10
9. Third antennal segment orange; tarsal segments mostly black. .
aurifex Osten-Sacken
Third antennal segment black; last tarsal segment black, the re-
maining reddish brown 6imacu/a Walker
10. Scutellum silvery pollinose; hind tibia black; metapleural bristles
entirely orange or pale yellow nugator Osten-Sacken
Scutellum not or hardly pollinose; hind tibia partly or entirely
orange, reddish, or yellow; metapleural bristles mixed orange
and black 11
11. Antennae entirely black 12
Third antennal segment orange 14
12. Basal one third of hind tibia black, the remaining orange or red-
dish brown 13
At least basal half of hind tibia orange, tibial apex black 14
13. Anterior tibia black; tibial pile long inversus Curran
Anterior tibia orange brown; tibial pile practically absent
albovarians Curran
14. Abdominal bands interrupted medially . . . .distinctitarsus new species
Abdominal bands complete, orange 15
15. Male 16
F emale 17
16. Front tibia and tarsus with white fringe of hairs, as long as dia-
meter of segments; pile on face orange; 2-4 abdominal seg-
ments with orange pile across the segments auratusCole
Front tibia and tar sus without fringe of hairs; bristles or hairs on
face black mixed with white ox yellow; pile of abdomen only on
lateral sides, absent from fourth segment . . . glarealis Melander
17. Pile on third abdominal segment as long as that on second
auratus Cole
Pile on third abdominal segment shorter than that on second ....
glarealis Melander
Cyrtopogon auratus Cole
Cyrtopogon auratus Cole 1919 • 230.
Cyrtopogon albitar sis Curran 1922 : 278-279.
Cyrtopogon albitarsis Curran 1924 : 279.
Adisoemarto
33
This species belongs to the aurifex group, in which the male ab-
dominal segments 2-4 are provided with dense fulvous pile across the
segments .
Males. Face withmane-like orange pile; front tibia and front tar sus
with fringe of white hairs on outer sides (fig. 78); fifth to seventh ab-
dominal segments short, tectiform; male genitalia black, form as in
figs. 226-229.
Females. Mane on gibbosity spar ser; fringe of white hairs absent
from front tibia and front tarsus; abdominal segments not tectiform,
yellow pile on first three segments shorter than that of male, still shorter
on fourth, and almost absent from fifth.
A female specimen from Yellowstone Park, Cascades Y.R., 22.
Vii. 1923 (A. L. Melander), was chosen as allotype of albitarsis Curran,
1922, but determined by G. Stuart Walley, 1932, as not the allotype.
This species rangds from Alberta to Oregon, southeast to Colorado;
holotype and 14 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBER TA: Banff (type locality; CNC); Banff, Lake Minnewanka, Davil's Gap
Trail (UA); Waterton (AMNH); Gorge Creek (UA).
Other localities - WASHINGTON': Mt, Spokane. OREGON: Strawberry Mtn. , Grant Co.
(CNC): Wallowa Lake. IDAHO: Long Valley, Alpha (UA). WYOMING: Yellowstone National
Park, Medison Junction (AMNH); Yellowstone N. P. , Cascades Y.R. (CNC); Sylvan Pass,
Yellowstone Park. COLORADO: Malta (AMNH). UTAH: Uintah Mts.
Cyrtopogon aurifex Osten-Sacken
Cyrtopogon aurifex Osten-Sacken 1877 : 301-302.
This species is similar to auratus Cole, but the two are distinguished
by the color of the metapleural bristles: entirely black in aurifex Osten-
Sacken, mixed with orange in auratus Cole.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
California; two specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Seebe, Kananaskis Forest (DE).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Vancouver Island. WASHINGTON: Mt. Adams,
Clearwater; Mt. Adams, Signal Peak. OREGON: Mary's Peak; Crater Lake. CALIFORNIA:
Weber Lake, Sierra Nevada; Gold Lake, Sierra Co.
Cyrtopogon willistoni Curran
Cyrtopogon willistoni Curran 1922 : 277-278.
This species belongs to the calHpedilus group, in which the last two
segments of the middle tarsus of the males are provided with a disc of
black hairs (fig. 80). The males of this group are more or less easily
separated from one another by the shape of the silvery hairs on the front
tarsi, but the females are hardly distinguishable.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
California and Colorado; 32 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (UA and CNC); Calgary (UA and DE); Mountain View (CNC);
Twin Butte (CNC); Waterton Lakes Park (CNC and UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Chilcotin (AMNH); Aspen Grove (AMNH) . Minnie
Lake; Nicola, Oliver. WASHINGTON: Signal Peak (AMNH); Blue Mts., Godman Springs ; Col-
ville; Mt. Adams; Mt. Spokane; Tampico; Yakima. OREGON: Fish Lake; Steins Mts.,
34
Asilidae of Alberta
Harnery Co. ; Ontario; Strawberry Mt. , Grant Co. IDAHO: Dong Valley, Alpha. MONTANA:
GallatinCo.; Madison Co. ; Bozeman. WYOMING: Mammoth Hot Springs , Y ellowstone National
Park (AMNH); Grand Teton NatT Park; COLORADO: Elbert (AMNH); Electra Lake (AMNH);
Ouray (AMNH); South Fork (AMNH). UTAH; Roosevelt Creek, R aft R iver M ts . ; Zion NatT
Park. CALIFORNIA; Coleville, Mono Co. (AMNH); Sacramento.
Cyrtopogon praepes Williston
Cyrtopogon praepes Williston 1884 : 12,
This species is similar to wiUistoni Curran. The males are dis-
tinguished by the presence of the silvery hairs on the first tarsal segment
of the front tarsus, and the females are distinguished by the yellowish
hairs on the hind femora.
Strickland (1938) included this species in his list, but I do not be-
lieve it occurs in Alberta. This species ranges from British Columbia
to California and Nevada; four specimens were examined.
Localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Vaseaux (CNC); Penticton (CNC); Robson (USNM).
WASHINGTON: Olympia; Roy. OREGON. IDAHO. NEVADA: Elko (USNM). CALIFORNIA:
San Francisco; Santa Cruz; Santa Rosa.
Cyrtopogon bimacula Walker
Euarmostus bimacula Walker 1851 : 102.
Cyrtopogon melanopleurus Loew 1866 I 61.
Cyrtopogon bimacula Loew 1874 : 365.
This species is easily recognized by the wings of the males: macu-
lated at the apex and the tip of the anal cell (fig. 155); in the females,
there is a tendency to light infuscation on the wings of the same pattern
as in the males; both sexes have largely yellowish white pile and black
metapleural bristles.
This species is transcontinental in the North, ranging from the
Northwest Territories to New Mexico; 71 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: High Level (UA); Flatbush, Pembina River (UA); Lac la Biche,
Owl River (UA); Chipewyan (CNC); Opal (UA); Sandy Lake (UA); Beaverlodge (UA); Nordegg;
Columbia Icefield (UA); Calgary (UA); Wilkinson Creek, Bow River Forest (UA); Lethbridge
(UA); Morrin (CNC); Medicine Hat (CNC); Elkwater (CNC); Cypress Hills (UA).
Other localities - NORTHWEST TERRITORIES: McKenzie Delta, Reindeer Depot (CNC).
BRITISH COLUMBIA: Steelhead; Lorna. WASHINGTON: Mt. Rainier, Sunrise, Paradise;
Mt. Baker. OREGON: Aneroud Lake Buie Mts.; Horst Mts., Lane Co.; Frog Meadows, Lane
Co. IDAHO. MONTANA: Skalkadho Pass, Ravalli Co. WYOMING: Yellowstone NatT Park.
COLORADO: Camp Creek R. Station; Aspen; South Peak; Ward. NEW MEXICO: Las Vegas
Mts. SASKATCHEWAN: Dandrum (CNC); Saskatoon (CNC); St. Victor (CNC). MANITOBA:
Douglas (CNC) . ONTARIO: Sand Lake (CNC); Sadbury. QUEBEC; Megantis (CNC); Seven Isles
(CNC). NOVA SCOTIA: Truo. NEW HAMPSHIRE; Breton Woods; Mt. Washington; White
Mountains .
Cyrtopogon distinctitarsus new species
This species resembles bimacula Walker to some extent, but is
distinguished by the color pattern of the legs and the color of the meta-
Adisoemarto
35
pleural bristles.
Female. Face, front, and vertex, golden yellow pollinose; mystax
black, mixed with golden yellow pile on center of gibbosity; hairs on
front, vertex, occiput, first two antennal segments, and second palpal
segment, black; beard, pile on first palpal segment and on lower side
of proboscis, white; antennae black; gibbosity prominent near antennal
base (fig. 18). Thorax golden yellow pollinose; pleura without shiny
bare area; pollinose color pattern similar to bimacula Walker; pile on
propleur on white, onpronotum, metanotum, and scutellum, black; meta-
pleural haris orange yellow. Legs bicolored; basal halves of tibiae,
basal three-fourths of basitarsi, basal halves of tarsal segments 2-3,
orange brown; the remainder of legs black; basal half of claws orange,
apex black; empodium very short, orange; pulvilli broad; pile on coxae
yellowish, on lower sides of femora white, on upper sides black, short,
appressed, longer on apices of hind pair, on tibiae, black, short, sparse;
bristles of tibiae and tarsi black. Wings hyaline, with micr otrichiae,
brownish maculate on the following: anterior crossvein, base of discal
cell, anterior branch of cubitus and mediocubital crossvein, apex of
discal cell and branching of third vein (fig. 156); anterior crossvein at
basal one fourth of discal cell; halteres orange. Abdomen black, more
or less similar to bimacula Walker; pile yellowish; spines reddish brown.
This species has beennamed distinctitarsus , becausethe color pattern
of the tarsi is quite distinct from the remaining species of Cyrtopogdn from
Alberta.
Holotype: Female, Opal, Alberta, 5. VII. 1963 (L. Kenakin and
S. Adisoemarto); deposited in CNC .
Paratypes: Female, Lac la Biche, sand dunes, N. E. shore, Al-
berta, 2-4. VII. 1964 (L. M. Kenakin and S. Adisoemarto); female ,
Lethbridge, Alberta, 24. VI. I960 (D. Larson); deposited in UA.
Cyrtopogon montanus Loew
Cyrtopogon montanus Loew 1874 : 362.
This species is easily recognized by the color of the mystax, and
the long pile on the abdominal segments and the legs, mostly black in
the males and white in the females. Upper middle part of mystax white,
the remaining black; frontal, vertical, and upper occipital pile black;
beard white; antennae black, third segment slightly orange, pile on first
two segments white. Propleural pile white, pile on the remainder of
thorax black. Legs mostly black, hind tibiae and hind tarsi reddish
brown; pile on coxae, lower basal femora, and dorsal sides of hind
tibiae, white, the remaining pile of legs black. Abdominal pile of male
bicolored, on posterior corners of each segment white, the remaining
black; male genitalia (figs. 230-233) black, with black hairs; abdominal
pile of females entirely white.
This species is found in central western North America, from
British Columbia, south to California, and eastto New Mexico; holotype
(CNC) and eight additional specimens were examined.
36
Asilidae of Alberta
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (type locality; CNC),
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Seton Lake (UA); Vernon; Departure Bay; Gold
Stream; Lillooet; Oliver. WASHINGTON: Cle Elum; Mt. Adams, Signal Peak, West Klickitat;
Mt, Rainier, Sunrise, White River; Olympia; White Rock Spring, Steven Pass, Cascade Moun-
tains. OREGON: Anthony Lake; Canby; Fox; Hood River; Marys Peak; McKenzie Pass; Mt.
Hood; La Grande; North Powder, IDAHO: Lake Waha; Long Valley, Alpha; Mosco Mt. ;
Potlach. UTAH: Ogden. CALIFORNIA: Towle (AMNH); Emigrant Gap (AMNH); Gold Lake
(AMNH); Sierra Nevada; Fallen Leaf Lake; Lake Tahoe; San Bernardino Mts. ; Mt. St. Alens;
Sequoia Nat'l Park, Welverton; Truckee; Yosemite Valley. COLORADO: Boulder; Gold Hill;
Longs Peak Inn; Ward; Poncha Pass. NEW MEXICO.
Cyrtopogon albovarians Curran
Cyrtopogon albitarsis Curran 1923 : 134-135, not Curran 1922 : 278-
279.
Cyrtopogon albovarians Curran 1924 : 279-280.
The first specimen was first described as the allotype of albitarsis
Curran 1922 (= amatus Cole), but then Curran (1924) realized that the
specimen belongs to a different species, and described it as albovarians .
It differs from amatus Cole (= a/6harsis Curran) in the following char-
acters: antennae entirely black; upper one third of mystax white, the
remainder black; pile on posterior mesonotum white; pile on meso-
pleuron longer, white on lower side, black on upper side; metapleural
pile white; metanotal pile black; pile on sides of third and fourth ab-
dominal segments mixed with black.
This species is known only from Alberta; holotype (CNC) and one
additonal specimen were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Banff (type locality; CNC); Wabamun (UA),
Cyrtopogon inversus Curran
Cyrtopogon inversus Curran 1923 : 172-173.
This species is similar to albovarians Curran, but can be distinguished
by the black anterior tibiae and the long tibial pile.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
Oregon, and east to Colorado; two specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Seebe, Kananaskis Forest (DE).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Aspen Grove; Darcy; Nicola; Chilcotin; Hadley;
Kamloops; Lillooet, Seton Lake. WASHINGTON: Signal Peak, R anger Station; Virden. OREGON:
Eagle Ridge, Klamath Lake. WYOMING: Yellowstone Nat'l Park. COLORADO: Longs Peak.
Cyrtopogon glarealis Melander
Cyrtopogon glarealis Melander 1923a : 113-114.
This species belongs to the pulcher group, but is distinguished from
pulcher Back by the color of the pile on the second abdominal segment of
the males (black in glarealis Melander, orange in pulcher Back), and by the
color of the metapleural hair s in the females (largely black in the former,
orange in the latter). Males of this group are easily recognized by the
form of the abdominal segments, which are gradually compressed later-
Adisoemarto
37
ally toward the posterior end, and by the orange third antennal segment.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
California and Wyoming; three specimens were examined.
Localities - ALHLR I A: Kootenay Plains, 116'Z5'W 52'^7'N (LMK).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Salmon Lake, Nicola District. WASHINGTON:
Spokane; Wolf Fork, Touchet River, Blue Mts. OREGON: Wallowa Lake, Aneroid Lake Trail.
IDAHO: Gold Hill, Latan flo. ; Moscow Mts. ; Long Valley, Alpha (UA). MONTANA: Big Hole
Battle Field, I'^eavcrhead Co.; Gallatin Co. WYOMING: Madison Junction, Yellowstone Nat'l
Park; Dunroven Pass. CALIFORNIA: Angora Peak, I'ahoe.
Cyrtopogon lineotarsus Curran
Cyrtopogon lineotarsus Curran 1923 : 187-188.
This species is a member of the leptotarsus group, in which the last
tarsal segment of the front tarsus is elongate (fig. 81). In the males,
the gibbosity is almost triangular from the anterior aspect; it reaches
the antennal base and is very prominent. A female specimen from Glacier
Park, Montana, 5. VIII. 1925 (G.A. Mail) was doubtfully identified by
Wilcox (1935) as Cyrtopogon lineotarsus Curran, and also described as the
female of lineotarsus Curran by Wilcox and Martin (1936), although they
were doubtful, because this specimen differed in the color of the mystax
from the type specimen; the mystax is entirely white in the female, and
some other differences are also obvious: the thoracic, abdominal, coxal,
and femoral pile, is entirely white. According to Wilcox and Martin
(1936), lineotarsus Curran could be the same species as predator Curran,
based on a comparison of the specimens of both sexes with the types of
both species.
This species ranges from Alberta to Montana; holotype (CNC) and
two additional specimens were examined.
Loralitifs - Ai. BERTA: Banff (type locality; CNC); Kananaskis Valley, Pocaterra Creek
(CA.S).
Other locality - MONTANA: Glacier Park.
Cyrtopogon sansoni Curran
Cyrtopogon sansoni Curran 1923 : 138-139.
This species belongs to the nugator group, in which the scutellum
is flat, largely pollinose on the center, shining on the edge. The hypo-
pleural hairs are entirely white, and the abdominal bands are interrupted
medially. Face broader than long; gibbosity golden brownish pollinose,
more or less rounded; front, vertex, and occiput greyish pollinose,
black pilose; mystax black; beard white. Meson^otal pile and scutellar
hairs brownish black; mesonotal bristles black.
This species is known from Alberta only; holotype (CNC) and allo-
type (CNC) were examined.
LocalitU's - ALBLR'l'A: Banff (type locality; CNC).
38
Asilidae of Alberta
Cyrtopogon nugator Osten-Sacken
Cyrtopogon nugator Osten-Sacken 1887 : 307.
This species is strikingly similar to sansoni Curran and hardly
distinguished from it. See Wilcox and Martin (1936) for the diagnostic
characters.
This species ranges from British Columbia, south to Arizona and
New Mexico. Strickland (1938) included this species in his list, but I do
not believe it occurs in Alberta; six specimens were examined.
Locahtu's - F’)RrilSi[ COLUMIilA: Saanich; Vernon; Agassiz. WASHINGTON; Signal
Peak; Rainier Nat'l loresl; Sumner (UA). OREGON; Mt. Hood. IDAHO; Lake Wala. CALI-
FORNIA: Weber Lake, Sierra CIo. (CNC); Grass Lake, Tahoe; Tioga Road; Yosemite.
COLORADO: Aspen (AMNH). NEW MPiXICQ: Cloudcroft. ARIZONA: Santa Catalina Mts.
(AMNH and ESNM).
Cyrtopogon dasyllis Williston
Cyrtopogon dasyllis Williston 1893 : 66.
Males have maculate wings, but the pattern is different from that
of bimacula Walker: specimens of dasyllis Williston have one black macula
on the apex of the wing, and a narrow one around the second cubital vein
(fig, 157); the abdomen is provided with yellowish long pile on the entire
first four abdominal segments, black on the remaining; hypandrium of
the male is provided with a pair of spine-like structures (fig. 236). The
wings of the females are not distinctly maculate, but are slightly infus-
cated in the place of the maculae.
This species ranges from Alaska and the Northwest Territories,
south to Oregon, and Colorado; 16 specimens were examined.
Localities - A LIH:IR TA : Banff (UA, CNC, andAMNH); Lake Louise (CNC); Jasper (CNC).
Other localities - AIASKA; Skagway (AMNH). NORTHWEST TERRITORIES: Cameron
Bay, Great Bear Lake (CNC). YUKON TER R ITOR lES: Whitchor s e (CNC ) . BR I TISH COLUMBIA:
Davie Lake (CNC); Robson (CNC); Shaswap (CNC); Juktakamin (CNC); Kaslo. WASHINGTON:
Mt. Rainier, Sunrise; Mt. Rainier, Paradise Inn; Mt. Rainier, White River Camp; Randle.
OREGON; Strawberry Mt., Grant Co. IDAHO. COLORADO; Deer Mt.
Genus Eucyrtopogon Curran
Eucyrtopogon Curran 1923 : 95. Type species Cyrtopogon nebulo Osten-Sacken
1877.
This genus is confined to the Nearctic Region, and includes 11
species (Hull 1962). In Alberta, Eucyrtopogon is represented by seven
species, one of them, incompletus , is new.
Face, front, and vertex, broad, narrower at antennal base; front
less slanting than Cyrtopogon Loew; third antennal segment elongate,
tapering apically (fig. 131); antennal style half as long as third segment;
fir st two antennal segments oval, subequal; proboscis short, stout (fig.
61); palpi two-segmented, long (fig. 43). Thorax slightly elongate;
mesonotum pilose; dorsocentral bristles weak; metapleural hairs always
present. Legs slender; femora and tibiae subequal, the former thicker;
bristles short, strong on tibiae and tarsi; pile present on tibiae; claws
Adisoemarto
39
strong, long. Wings hyaline, maculate in certain areas (figs. 158, 159);
one and a half times as long as abdomen; microtrichiae usually present,
but absent from albibarbis Curran. Abdomen semiparallel, curved dor-
sally, about one and a hcdf times as long as thorax; posterior corners of
segment 1 to 6 always pilose, seventh segment in some species bare;
pile longer on sides, short and appressed on dorsum; male genitalia
black, concealed, almost constant in form within the genus (figs. 238-
242); acanthophorites with four to six pairs of spines . Sexual dimorphism
very slight, present in some species on the pattern of pile and hairs,
pattern of costal setulae, and pollen of the abdomen.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Key to the Species of Eucyrtopogon Curran of Alberta
Male 2
F emale 7
Wing clear, microtrichiae absent a/6i6ar6is Curran
Wing with microtrichiae 3
Middle line of thorax with very conspicuous mane-like white and
black hairs * comantis Curran
No condensation of pile to form a mane 4
Wings with a double row of setulae, black, curved 5
Costal setulae pale brownish or orange, not curved 6
From side aspect mystax with ends of hairs pale yellowish or white
diversipilosus Curran
Mystax with ends of hairs brownish nebulo Osten-Sacken
Costal setulae end between tip of subcosta and first longitudinal
vein incompletus n. sp.
Costal setulae complete, reaching wing tip
calcarata Curran or spinigera Curran
Wings without microtrichiae albibarbis Cur r dm
Microtrichiae present 8
Seventh abdominal segment without sericeous pollen
ne6u/o Osten-Sacken
Seventh abdominal segment with sericeous pollen 9
Mesonotum with acrostichal white mane anteriorly 10
Mesonotum without such mane 11
Front tibia and all tarsi with prominent white mane-like pile ....
comantis Curran
Front tibia and tarsi with less conspicuous mane-like pile
incompletus new species
Sericeous pollen on sixth abdominal segment extending broadly
almost to base of segment calcarata Curran
Pollen not extending over two-thirds the distance to base, or only
very narrowly so on sides 12
Acanth.ophorite with four pairs of spines diversipilosus Curran
Acanthophorite with five or six pairs of spines . . . .spinigera Curran
40
Asilidae of Alberta
Eucyrtopogon comantis Curran
Eucyrtopogon comantis Cur T3in 1923 : 116--117.
This species is recognized by the presence of the mane-like white
pile on the acrostichal area of the mesonotum; this vestiture is also
present in albibarbis Curran, but these two species are easily distinguished
by the presence or absence of micr otrichiae of the wings. Sides of face
with white mane; each bristle of mystax bicolored, brownish black bas-
ally, yellowish white apically; ocellar and antennal bristles brownish
yellow. Legs black; coxal pile yellowish; femoral pile long, white,
appressed on dorsal sides; pile on front and middle tibiae white, short,
appressed, mane-like, half aslongas tibia diameter , continued to dorsal
sides of tarsi, less conspicuous on hind pair; pile in females longer;
claws black. Posterior corners of fourth, fifth, and sixth abdominal
segments with bristle-like brownish hairs, absent from females; venter
white pilose; male genitalia black; acanthophorite with five pairs of
spines .
This species is known from British Columbia and Alberta, south
to Colorado; holotype (CNC) and nine additional specimens were exam-
ined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Fabyan, Campsite (UA); Medicine Hat (UA and AMNH); Calgary
(CNC); Magrath (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Chilcotin (type locality; CNC); Vernon (CNC);
Departure Bay (CNC). WYOMING. COLORADO: Maez Creek, Huerfano Co. (USNM); Wet
Mts., Huerfano Co. (USNM).
Eucyrtopogon albibarbis Curran
Eucyrtopogon albibarbis Curran 1923 : 117.
This species is similar to comantis Curran, but is readily distin-
guished by the absence of villi or micr otrichiae from the wings. Upper
two thirds of face white pilose; each bristle of mystax bicolored, black
basally, white apically. Mesonotum is provided with acrostichal mane.
Dorsal faces of front tibia and of all tar si with appressed mane-like white
pile, of equal size in both sexes.
This species is known from Alberta and Saskatchewan; holotype
(CNC) and 16 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Fabyan, Campsite (UA); Medicine Hat (CNC); Calgary (UA).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Saskatoon (CNC); Moose Jaw (type locality; CNC);
Regina (USNM).
Eucyrtopogon incompletus new species
This species resembles comantis Curran and albibarbis Curran, but
differs in the following respects: the male has curved costal setulae on
the wing, which end a considerable distance before the wing tip; the
wing tip; the front tibia of the females is without obvious white mane.
This species is distinguished from comantis by the following char-
acters: mesonotal pile less abundant, acrostichal mane less obvious;
costal setulae not complete, ending between subcosta and first longi-
Adi soemarto
41
tudinal vein; costa from this point to apex bare; front tibia of female
without obvious white mane. From albibarbis Curran, it is distinguished
by the following characters; micr otrichiae present on wings of both sexes;
costal setulae present.
Male. Face white pollinose; mystax black, mixed with white pile
on upper and lateral margins; front, vertex, and occiput brownish pol-
linose; hairs on front, vertex, and occiput brownish; six ocellar bris-
tles black half basally, white apically; first two antennal segments sub-
equal, black, white pilose; third antennal segment missing; beard and
pile on proboscis and palpi, white. Thorax more or less similar to
comanUs Curran, but acrostichal pile shorter. Legs similar to comantis
Curran. Wings with micr otrichiae, costal setulae end between subcosta
and first longitudinal vein; shape and color of costal setulae similar to
those of comantis Curran.. Abdomen similar to comantis Curran.
Female. Pile on front tibia normal, not produced into long, mane-
like pile as in comantis Curran; the remainder similar to comantis Curran.
The name incompletus has been chosen for this species on the basis
of the shape of the incomplete costal setulae.
Holotype; Male, Cypress Hills, Alberta, 26. V. 1964 (S.
Adisoemarto) ; deposited in CNC.
Paratypes: Two females, same locality, 24. V. 1964 (S.
Adisoemarto); deposited in UA.
Eucyrtopogon calcarata Curran
Eucyrtopogon calcarata Curran 1923 : 119.
The males of this species are readily recognized by the costal
setulae, which are longer than the diameter of the costa, and by the
presence of a conical tubercle on the anterior apex of the hind coxa. The
sixth abdominal segment of the females is provided with broad s ericeous
pollen on the sides.
This species is known from British Columbia and Alberta; holo-
type (CNC) and 12 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Waterton Lakes (CNC); Cowley (UA); Coleman (CNC); Banff
(type locality; CNC); Jasper (UA); Edmonton (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC); Cranbrook (CNC); Princeton
(CNC).
Eucyrtopogon spinigera Curran
Eucyrtopogon spinigera Curran 1923 : 117-118.
The males are very similar to calcarata Curran, but the females
are distinguished by the size of the pollinose marking on the sixth ab-
dominal segment, being less than two thirds of the length of the seg-
ment.
This species is known from the Northwest Territories to Alberta
and British Columbia; holotype (CNC) and 10 additional specimens were
examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Calgary (CNC); Cowley (CNC); Medicine Hat (UA).
42
Asilidae of Alberta
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA; Victoria (type locality; CNC); Pass Creek (CNC) ;
Copper Mtn. (CNC).
Eucyrtopogon diversi pilosis Curran
Eucyrtopogon diversipilosis CuTT3.n 1923 : 118.
This species is similar to spinigera Curran. The males are dis-
tinguished by differences in costal setulae: diversipilosis Curran, they
areblackand curved; in spinigera Curran, they are orange and not curved.
This species is known from British Columbia and Alberta; holo-
type (CNC) and four additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (CNC); Coleman (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Chilcotin (type locality; CNC); Lavington (CNC);
Wilmer (CNC).
Eucyrtopogon nebulo Osten-Sacken
Cyrtopogon nebulo Osten-Sacken 1877 : 309.
Eucyrtopogon nebulo Curran 1923 : 120-121.
This species is similar to diversipilosis Curran, especially the males,
but the females are readily distinguished by the absence of the pollen
from the seventh abdominal segment.
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta, south to
California, Wyoming, and Utah; six specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Waterton (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Royal Oak (CNC); Duncan (CNC); Trinity Valley
(CNC); Cranbrook (AMNH). IDAHO: Moscow (USNM). WYOMING: Jackson's Lake (AMNH).
UTAH: Logan Canyon (USNM); Logan Peak (USNM). CALIFORNIA.
Genus Comantella Curran
Comantella Curran 1923 : 93. Type species: Cophura fallei Back 1909.
This genus is similar to Eucyrtopogon Curran, but is distinguished
by the presence of a curved spur on the apex of the front tibia. The male
genitalia show similarity in general appearance to those of Eucyrtopogon
Curran (figs. 243-247). Four species are included in this genus, all
found in the Nearctic Region. In Alberta, two species are known. The
species of this genus are very similar to one another. James (1937) has
presented a key to the species of this genus.
Key to the Species of Comantella Curran of Alberta
Thoracic mane on a clearly defined black vitta rotgeri James
Medial vitta of thorax at most poorly defined fallei Back
Adisoemarto
43
Comantella fallei Back
Cophura tallei Back 1919 • 378-379.
Comantella maculosa Curran 1923 : 93-94.
Comantella fallei Cut T Sin 1923 : 311-312.
This species is strikingly similar to rotgeri James. For the diag-
nostic characters, see James (1937). This species has been recorded
from Medicine Hat, Alberta, in late winter, and early and mid fall. It
ranges from Alberta southeast to Colorado and Nebraska; 12 specimens
were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA and CNC).
Other localities - WYOMING. COLORADO: Denver (CNC). NEBRASKA: Crawford (CNC) .
Comantella rotgeri James
Comantella rotgeri James 1937 : 61.
This species is distinguished from fallei Back on the following
characters: medial vitta of thorax definitely demarcated, mystax coarser,
not white tipped, pale hairs and bristles deeper yellow, pale pile coarser,
less dense, ventral pile coarser, more extensively black.
This species ranges from Alberta to New Mexico; two specimens
were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (USNM).
Other localities - COLORADO: Rio Seco, Costilla Co. NEW MEXICO.
Subfamily Laphriinae
This subfamily is represented by three genera, which belong to
two tribes. They live either in coniferous or parkland forests. Laphria
Meigen and Bombomima Enderlein are difficult to distinguish, but there is
a tendency in Bombomima Enderlein towards a more rounded abdomen.
There is also a difference in the shape of the pseudoclasper s of these
two groups: in Laphria Meigen, they are relatively simple; in Bombomima
Enderlein, they are forked (figs. 266, 270, 273, 276). Before the genus
Bombomima Enderlein was erected, its species were treated under DasylHs
Loew. Banks stated that DasylHs Loew (s.l. : DasylHs Loew and Bombomima
Enderlein) was an offshoot of the genus Laphria Meigen. Hull (1962) placed
these genera in different tribes.
Key to the Genera of Laphriinae of Alberta
1. Proboscis on apical half compressed dor socentr ally (fig. 62); third
antennal segment dilated, as long as first two segments together
(fig. 132); wings with first submarginal cell divided into two
(fig. 160) Po^onosoma R ondani
Proboscis compressed laterally; third antennal segment slender
(fig. 133), longer than first two segments together; first sub-
marginal not divided (fig. 161) 2
2. Abdomen robust, more or less rounded, densely pilose; pile on
44
Asilidae of Alberta
mesonotum covers ground color; pseudoclasper forked (fig.
266) Bombomima Enderlein
Abdomen parallel- sided, less pilose; mesonotal ground color,
not entirely covered by pile; pseudoclasper simple (fig. 251
pci) Laphria Meigen
Genus Pogonosoma Rondani
Pogonosoma Rondani 1856 : 160. Type species: Asilus maroccanum F. 1794.
In theNearctic Region, this genus has only three species. Cresson
(1920) treated melanoptera Wiedemann as conspecific with dorsata Say, but
Hull (1962) treated them as two different species. The third species is
ridingsi Cresson.
Face thick, with slight slit under antennal base; gibbosity rounded,
starting at about middle of face (fig. 23); vertex deeply excavated (fig.
24); ocellar plate with one or two pairs of bristles; bristles or, bristle-
like hairs present on orbital margin of front (opposite to antennal base,
fig. 24); first antennal segment stout, second shorter and smaller in
diameter, third narrow at base, dilated and oval apically, bristles present
on apical lower side of first segment (fig. 132); proboscis compressed
dor socentrally, pointed apically; palpi two- segmented, second segment
flattened, thin, and scoop-like (fig. 47). Thorax opaque, thinly pollinose;
hairs present on prothorax, posterior half of mesopleuron, upper half
of pteropleuron, and scanty on mesonotum, semierect; bristle-like hair s
present on metapleuron; dor socentral bristles absent. Femora slightly
thicker subapically; tibiae slightly curved, provided with hairs, hind
pairs with bristles; bristles present on tar si; second to fourth segments
of tar sus heart-shaped; claws strongly curved apically; empodium long.
Wings longer than abdomen (fig. 160), evenly covered with microtrichiae,
sometimes infuscated along veins; marginal cell closed with long stalk;
first submarginal cell divided by crossvein; first posterior cell open
or closed, sometimes with stalk; fourth posterior cell closed with stalk;
anterior crossvein at basal one-third of discalcell; alula well developed.
Abdomen semiparallel in males, slightly wider subapically in females;
first five segments with two to four bristles on middle of each side; pile
short, longer on venter, subappressed on dorsum.
Strickland (1938) recorded one species, ridingsi Cresson, from
Alberta.
Key to the Species of Pogonosoma Rondani of Alberta
Beard on lower orbital margin black; coxal pile mixed black and
white; front femoral and tibial hair s entirely black; metapleural
hairs in female black; abdominal hairs in female entirely black
stricklavdi new species
Beard entirely white; coxal pile entirely white; front femoral and
tibial hairs mixed black and white; metapleural hair s infemale
white; abdominal hairs infemale white on first three segments
Adisoemarto
45
ridingsi C res son
Pogonosoma ridingsi Cresson
Pogonosuma ridingsi Cresson 1920 : 214-215.
This species is similar to dorsata Say (Cresson 1920), but is dis-
tinguished from the latter mainly by the difference of the color of the
pile, hairs, and bristles.
This species ranges from British Columbia southeast to California
and Texas. Strickland (1938) included this species in his list. So far,
I have seen only a female specimen of Pogonosoma from Alberta, which is
stricklandi new species; holotype (USNM) and 10 additional specimens were
examined.
Localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA; Robson (CNC and USNM): Copper Mtn. (CNC); Kamloops
(CNC); Departure Bay (CNC); Victoria (CNC). CALIFORNIA: Plumas Co. COLORADO;
Florissant (type locality; USNM). TEXAS: Waco (USNM).
Pogonosoma stricklandi new species
This species is easily distinguished from ridingsi Cresson by the
presence of black pile on the lower orbital mar gin and the entirely black
pile or hairs on the front and the middle legs. The female differs from
those of ridingsi Cresson in the color of the metapleural hairs, entirely
black, and th§ abdominal pile, also entirely black.
Female. Pile, hairs, and bristles on face white, few black bristles
on middle of gibbosity; beard white, mixed with black on maxillae; oc-
cipital pile white on lower half, black on upper half and on orbital margin;
frontal, vertical, and ocellar pile black; ocellar bristles black; antennal
first two segments orange, bristles black, pile white on lower sides,
black on upper sides. Thorax white pollinose; pile mostly black, white
on proepimeron, and on anterior and posterior corners of mesopleuron;
metapleural hairs black; all bristles black. Legs black, coxae white
pollinose; pile, hairs, and bristles black, sparse white pile on front
coxae, few white hairs on subapical dorsal side of hind femur. Wings
covered with brown microtrichiae; halter es black. Abdominal pile,
hairs, and bristles entirely black.
This species is named in honor of the late Dr. E. H. Strickland.
Holotype: Female, Waterton, Alberta, 12. VII. 1923 (E.H.
Strickland); deposited in CNC.
Genus Bombomima Enderlein
Bombomima Enderlein 1914 : 253. Type species: Laphria fulvi thorax Fabricius
1805.
This genus resembles Laphria Meigen. The distinguishing character s
are, so far, not satisfying. The females of Bombomima usually have a
broad abdomen, but the abdomen of the males is slender as in Laphria
Meigen. Another character which may be used for distinguishing these
46
Asilidac- of Alberta
two groups is the shape of the pseucloelaspers. Psc'udoelasper s of 13
species of Bombomima and 11 species of Laphria have Ijeen examined. In
Laphria sackeni Wilcox, the ps eudoc la sper is not as in the other species of
Laphria Meigcn, but rather pr ovided with a "tooth", although not as complex
as those of Bombomima Enderlcin (figs. Z66, Z70, Z73, Z76).
This genus is known only from the Nearctic Region. In Alberta,
five species have been recorded, most of them were from the Montane
or Subalpine region.
Key to the Species of Bombomima Ended ein of Alberta
1. Third and fourth, sometimes also fifth, abdominal segments with
vivid orange-red hairs posteriorly; the succeeding segments
with yellow hairs fernaldi Back
Abdominal hairs unicolored, yellow Z
Z. Humerus, and usually also pronotum and upper occiput with black
hairs 3
Humerus, pronotum, and upper occiput with pale yellow hairs . . .4
3. Two apical abdominal segments entirely yellow haired
columbica Walker
Three apical abdominal segments yellow haired partitor Banks
4. Posterior half of mesonotum vivid orange-red haired, contrasting
with yellow hairs of anterior half .insignia Banks
Mesonotum uniformly with pale yellow hairs posticata Say
Bombomima columbica Walker
Laphria columbica Walker 1868 : 338.
Bombomima columbica Hull 196Z : 3Z5.
This species is similar to partitor Banks, but is distinguished by
the absence of yellow pile from the fourth abdominal segment. The male
genitalia are similar (figs. Z64-Z7 0).
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta, south to
California; 14 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBLiR T^'V: Grinishaw (U.A).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA; Robson (CXC); Sugar Lake(CNC); A gas siz (CNC) ;
Victoria (CNC). WASHINGTON: I-.llensburg (AMNH). OREGON, CALIFORNIA.
Bombomima partitor Banks
Dasyllis partitor Banks 1917 : 54.
Bombomima partitor Hull 196Z : 3Z5.
This species is easily recognized by the pattern of the pile. The
pile is unicolored yellow; on the anterior half of the mesonotum it is
erect, and from dorsal view the ground color of the mesonotum is visible ;
on the posterior half of the mesonotum, the pile is decumbent, and con-
ceals the ground color. Pile is present on the last five abdominal seg-
ments .
Adisoemarto
47
This species is known from British Columbia and Alberta, south
to Idaho and Oregon; 36 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Banff (CNC); Banff, Lake Minnewanka, Campsite (UA); Seebe
(CNC); Nordegg, North Saskatchewan River Valley (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC); Copper Mtn. (CNC); Chilcotin
(CNC); Sugar Lake (CNC); Seton, Lillooet (CNC); Uclucet (CNC); Nicola (CNC); Douglas Lake
(CNC); Shuswap Falls (CNO; .'^t. St. James (CNC); Ft. Steele (CNC); Westwold (CNC); Chase
(CNC); Vernon (CNC); Keremeos (CNC) ; Kelowna (CNC); Penticton (CNC) ; Summer land (CNC) .
IDAHO: Victor. WASHINGTON. OREGON.
B ombomima fernald'i Back
Dasyllis fernaldi Back 1904 : 2 90.
B ombomima femaldi Bromley 1929 I 160.
This species is similar to columbica Walker and partitor Banks, but
is distinguished by the color pattern of the pile and by the male genitalia
(figs. 271, 273). The pile on the presternum varies from entirely black
to mixed black and yellow; on the mesopleuron, the pile is of three dif-
ferent patterns, entirely black, entirely yellow, or mixed black and yellow.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
Arizona and New Mexico; 127 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Jasper (CNC); Waterton (CNC and UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA; Robson (CNC); R evelstoke Mtn. (CNC); Lillooet
(CNC); Victoria (CNC); Departure Bay (CNC). WASHINGTON. OREGON. IDAHO; Moscow
Mts. (AMNH). WYOMING: Yellowstone (AMNH): Jackson (AMNH). UTAH. COLORADO:
Summit Road (AMNH); Aspen (AMNH); Ouray (AMNH); Electra Lake (CNC); Pingree Park
(AMNH). NEW MEXICO: Santa Fe Canyon (AMNH). ARIZONA: Flaggstaff (AMNH); Grand
Canyon (AMNH); San Francisco (AMNH). MONTANA; Glacier Park (UA).
Bombomima posticata Say
Laphria posticata Say 1824 : 374.
Bombomima posticata Bromley 1929 ’ 160.
This species is recognized by the uniformly yellow pilose meso-
notum. The mesonotal pile is mor e or less decumbent on the mesonotum,
erect only on the acrostichal line and transverse suture, from dorsal
view it appears as an inverted-T black marking. Bromley (1929) des-
cribed two varieties, brunnea and scufe/Zaris, which were treated as differ ent
species by Hull (1962) . The specimens found in Alberta belong to scutellaris
Bromley, buthere they are treated as poshcaZa Say, becaus e the differ ence
between these two forms is slight: scutellar bristles are blackin posticata
Say, and yellow in scutellaris Bromley.
This species ranges from Alberta and the Northwest Territories,
east to New Brunswick, and south to New York and Connecticut; holo-
type of scutellaris Bromley (CNC) and 26 additional specimens were ex-
amined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Lesser Slave Lake (UA); Cross Lake (UA); Nordegg (CNC).
Other localities - NORTHWEST TERRITORIES. MANITOBA: Victoria Beach (CNC);
Sandilands (CNC). ONTARIO: Lake Nipigon (CNC); Sadbury (CNC); Ottawa (CNC); Guelph
(CNC); Orilla (CNC); Sand Lake (CNC). QUEBEC: Aylmer (CNC); Fairy Lake (CNC). NEW
BRUNSWICK: St. Leonard (CNC); Nerepis (CNC). MAINE: Great Pond (USNM). NEW
HAMPSHIRE; Franconia (AMNH). MASSACHUSETTS; Amherst (USNM) ; Boston (AMNH) . NEW
YORK: North Elba (AMNH). CONNECTICUT; Avon (AMNH).
48
Asilidae of Alberta
Bombomima insignis Banks
Dasyllis insignia Banks 1917 : 54.
Bombomima insignis Hull 1962 : 325,
This species is similar to posticata Say, but is distinguished by the
presence of orange pile on the posterior half of the mesonotum. The
male genitalia are in general similar (figs. 274-276).
This species ranges from Alberta to Nova Scotia, south to Min-
nesota; 21 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Bilby (UA and CNC); Chipewyan (CNC).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Attons Lake (CNC); Weskesin Lake (CNC). MANI-
TOBA: Aweme (CNC); Teulon (CNC). MINNESOTA: Duluth (AMNH). ONTARIO: Lake Nipigon
(CNC). QUEBEC: Norway Bay (CNC). NOVA SCOTIA: Kentville (CNC),
Genus Laphria IVI eigen
Laphria Meigen 1803 : 27 0.
In this genus the abdomen tends to have parallel sides in both sexes,
but in janus McAtee, the abdomen of the females broadens slightly, as
in the species of Bombomima Enderlein. The pseudoclasper in the male
genitalia of janus McAtee, has a projection (fig. 261). This same form
of pseudoclasper is found in Laphria vultur Osten-Sacken and L. sackeni
Wilcox (figs. 262-263). The mesonotal and abdominal pile varies from
very sparse and short, as in felis Osten-Sacken and xanf/tippe Williston, or
appressed, as in aimatis McAtee and gilva L. , to erect, as in janus McAtee.
There are nine species known from Alberta, Most were collected
near coniferous forest.
Key to the Species of Laphria Meigen of Alberta
1. Dorsum of abdomen usually without pile, but if pile is present it
is spar se and very appressed; third antennal segment cylindrical
(fig. 133) 2
Abdominal pile erect, at least on sides; third antennal Segment
dilated subapically (fig. 137) • 3
2. A.bdomen entirely black; femora entirely orange; third antennal
segment five times as long as second (fig. 136) . . sac/a/es Walker
Abdomen black anteriorly, orange posteriorly; at least anterior
femora entirely black; third antennal segment seven times as
long as second (fig. 133) xanfft/ppe Willis ton
3. Ground color of abdominal dorsum entirely black 5
Abdominal dorsum with triangular orange markings 4
4. Three abdominal segments with orange markings, sixth segment
black gilva Linnaeus
Four abdominal segments with orange marking .a/maD's McAtee
5. Beard and pile on coxae white; bristles on face mainly black,
mixed with yellow pile in mane 7
Beard and pile on coxae yellow or orange; bristles on face mainly
yellow or orange 6
Adisoemarto
49
6. Bristles on face orange and black; humeral hair s orange or yellow
vivax Willis ton
Bristles on face orange-yellow; humeral hairs black in males,
mixed with orange in females janus McAtee
7. Pile and mane on face yellow or orange; abdominal pile concolorous
orange-yellow scorpio McAtee
Pile and mane on face white; pile on face white; pile on first ab-
dominal segment white or paler than the rest of abdominal pile
8
8. Metapleural hairs dark brown or black; all or few of scutellar
bristles black aetus McAtee
Metapleural hairs white; scutellar bristles yellowish
index McAtee
Laphria Xanthippe Willis ton
Laphria Xanthippe Williston 1884 : 31-32.
This species is easily recognized by the almost bare abdomen and
the reddish brown hind femora. There is slight sexual dimorphism in
this species. The reddish color of the abdomen and of the hind femur is
broader in the males. The beard is white in the males and black in the
females. The facial mane is entirely white in the males, mixed with
black in the females.
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta, south to
Oregon, and east to Colorado; 26 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (CNC); Banff, Lake Minnewanka, Campsite (UA); Bow
River Forest, Wilkinson Creek (UA); Water'ton Lakes (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: R evelstoke Mtn. (CNC) ; Fort Steele (CNC) ; Hedley,
Nickel Plate (CNC); Jesmond (CNC). OREGON: Mt. Hood (USNM). WYOMING: Yellowstone
Nat'l Park (AMNH). COLORADO: Electra Lake (AMNH).
Laphria sadales Walker
Laphria sadales Walker 1849 : 378-379.
Dasy//rs puiescens Williston 1884 : 32.
Laphria sadales McAtee 1918 : 161.
This species is similar to Xanthippe Williston, but is easily distin-
guished by the entirely black abdomen and reddish legs, except for the
black coxae. Sexual dimorphism is very slight. The abdomen of the
males is paler posteriorly, with golden yellow dorsal pile. The pile on
the abdomen of the females is entirely black.
This species ranges from Alberta to California and Colorado, east
to New Hampshire and Connecticut. The western and eastern populations
are probably connected by geographically intermediate populations in the
Boreal forests; 22 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Assineau River, near Lesser Slave Lake (UA); Banff (CNC);
Clymont (UA); Waterton (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC); Trinity Valley (CNC); Nicolum
River; HopeMts.; Kaslo. WASHINGTON: MoscowMts. (USNM); Mt. R ainier (USNM) ; Electron
(USNM); Olympia; Pullman. OREGON: Strawberry Mt. (AMNH); Marys Peak (AMNH); Mt.
50
Asilidae of Alberta
Hood. IDAHO; Long Valley, Alpha (UA). WYOMING: Yellowstone (AMNH). CALIFORNIA.
Towle (AMNH); Fieldbrook; Humboldt Co. COLORADO; Chatanqua (USNM). ONTARIO: (CNC).
QUEBEC: Laniel (CNC). VERMONT: Rutland; Chittenden. NEW ITAMPSHIRE: Franconia
(AMNH); White Mts.; Mt. Washington (AMNH), MASSACHUSETTS: Southbridge (USNM).
CONNECTICUT: Avon (AMNH). NEW YORK; Axton.
Laphria scorpio McAtee
Lap/iria Scorpio Me A tee 1918 : 163-164.
This species can be distinguished from the two proceeding species
by the presence of erect pile on the abdomen, and from the other species
of the genus by the black bristles on the face and the concolorous ab-
dominal pile. Facial protrusion near antennal base not too obvious (fig.
25); a row of black bristles present on each facial submargin; facial
mane and pile orange; beard white; hairs on first palpal segment whit^
on second black; third antennal segment blade- shaped, without groove
(fig. 137). Thorax black; mesonotum and scutellum shiny, the rest
yellowish white pollinose; pile mostly black, white on propleuron and
anterior corner of sternopleuron, and golden yellow, appressed, on
mesonotum and scutellum; metapleuralhair s yellow mixed with few black.
Legs black; pile on coxae, on loser sides of femora, and on front and
middle tibiae of female, white; hajrs and bristles black; tomentum on
tarsi and frontal tibiae, brownish; claws black, empodium brownish
orange. Wings cover ed with brownish microtrichiae, darker along veins,
halter es yellow. Abdomen black; male sixth segment elevated medio-
posteriorly, with a pair of stumpy projections, seventh also with a median
projection, which more or less fits into a space between projections on
sixth segment (figs. 99, 100); pile short, orange, appressed on dorsum;
venter orange pilose; male genitalia black (figs. 243-258). In Alberta,
this species was collected on the edge of coniferous forest.
This species has beenrecorded mostly from eastern central North
America, from New Hampshire to Virginia, Ontario and Alberta; holo-
type and 19 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Kinuso, near Lesser Slave Lake (UA).
Other localities - ONTARIO: Trenton (CNC); Lake Nipigon (CNC), QUEBEC: Laniel
(CNC). VERMONT: Camel's Hump. NEW HAMPSHIRE: White Mts. (type locality; USNM and
AMNH); Mt. Washington (AMNH). NEW YORK: North Elba (AMNH); Chateaugay. PENNSYL-
VANIA: Springboro (USNM). VIRGINIA: Skyland (USNM).
Laphria aeatus Walker
Laphria aeatus Walker 1849 : 381.
This species resembles scorpio McAtee, but the color of the facial
mane and pile immediately distinguishes it from the latter. Other diag-
nostic characters are as follows: the third antennal segment has a nar-
row apical slit (fig. 138), and the abdominal pile is white on the first
segment, and yellow on the remainder . This species is found near coni-
ferous forests in northern Alberta.
This species ranges from Vermont and Ontario to Alberta; five
specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Assineau River, near Lesser Slave Lake (UA).
Adisoemarto
51
Other localities - ONTARIO: Lake Nigipon (CNC).. VERMONT: Laurel Lake (USNM).
Laphria index McAtee
Laphria index McAtee 1918 : 164.
This species is similar to aeatus Walker, but is distinguished by
the longer mystax, the pattern of the mesonotal pile, triangular from
dorsal view, and entirely yellow scutellar bristles.
The species scorpio McAtee, index McAtee, and aeatus Walker, have
one character in common: the tubercles on the ends of the sixth and the
seventh abdominal segments. In Alberta, this species was collected
from the same habitat as that of LapAria aea^us Walker .
This species is known from eastern central North America and
Alberta; holotype (USNM) and 29 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Assineau River, near Lesser Slave Lake (UA).
Other localities - MANITOBA: Aweme (CNC). ONTARIO: Lake Nipigon (CNC); Lake
Abitibi (CNC); Point Pelee (CNC); Guelph (CNC); Jordan (CNC); Orilla (CNC); Bobcaygeon
(CNC); Ottawa (CNC). QUEBEC: Aylmer (CNC); Chelsea (CNC); Montreal (CNC); Hemming-
ford (CNC); Wakefield (QNC); Quoey Hill (CNC). NEW YORK: Nepara Park Yonkers, Flushing
(USNM); New York. CONNECTICUT: Avon (USNM). NEW JERSEY: Ramsey (USNM); Fort
Lee. PENNSYLVANIA: Harrisburg (type locality; USNM); Linglestown; Stoverdale. VIRGINIA:
Dead Run.
Laphria janus McAtee
Laphria janus h/ic Ate e 1918 : 153-154,
This species is readily distinguished from the other species of
Laphria Meigen of Alberta, by the bright orange color of the abdominal
pile, and the yellow mesonotal pile. The abdomen of the female is rather
rounded (fig. 101), and is more or less similar to that of Bombomima
Enderlein. The male genitalia are also similar to those of Bombomima
Enderlein, but the fork of the pseudoclasper is not very strong (fig, 261).
Most of the specimens from Alberta were collected near coniferous
forest.
This species is known in eastern and western central North
America. In the west it is distributed from Alberta to Washington, east
to Colorado, and in the east it is recorded from Maine to Michigan;
holotype (USNM) and 23 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: High Level (UA); Kinuso (UA); Assineau River, near Lesser
Slave Lake (UA); Cross Lake (UA); Bilby (UA); Edmonton (UA); Nordegg, North Saskatchewan
River Valley (UA); Gorge Creek (UA); Banff (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Kaslo. WASHINGTON: Brodie. WYOMING.
COLORADO: Creede; Tolland. ONTARIO: Heyden; Sault St. Marie. MICHIGAN: Isle Royal;
Dickinson Co. NE W HAMPSHIR E: Mt. Washington (type locality; USNM); Mt. White; Ottolengui.
NEW YORK. MAINE.
Laphria vivax Williston
Dasyllis vivax Williston 1884 : 30.
Laphria vivax McAtee 1918 : 156.
This species is recognized by the pattern of the pile. The pile is
52
Asilidae of Alberta
yellow; on the abdomen it is decumbent on the posterior margins and
from a dorsal aspect it is visible only on the lateral and posterior mar-
gins.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia, south to
Washington, and east to Colorado; 10 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Banff (UA); Banff, Sulfur Mt. (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson(CNC); Chilcotin (CNC) ; Copper Mountain
(CNC); Kaslo (CNC). WASHINGTON. IDAHO: Moscow (USNM). COLORADO: Marshall Pass
(USNM); Summit Co.
Laphria aimatis McAtee
Lap/jria aimahs McAtee 1918 : 160-161,
This species is easily recognized by the presence of orange-yellow
markings on some of the abdominal segments.
This species ranges from Alberta and British Columbia south to
California and Colorado; holotype and 21 additional specimens were ex-
amined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Brule Lake, near Jasper (USNM).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC); Midday Valley (CNC); Merritt
(CNC); Vernon (CNC); Oliver (CNC). IDAHO: Moscow Mts. (AMNH); Krasel (USNM)
CALIFORNIA: Baron (type locality; USNM); Midway (AMNH); Carrville, Trinity Co. (AMNH);
Shasta (AMNH); Edwards; Sierra Nevada; Placerville. COLORADO: El Paso (USNM); Lead-
ville (AMNH).
Laphria gilva Linnaeus
Asilus gilvus Linnaeus 1858 : 605,
Laphria gilva McAtee 1918 : 155-156.
This species is similar to aimatis McAtee, but is distinguished by
a difference in the number of orange markings on the dorsum of the ab-
domen: there are three on Laphria gilva L. , and one each on the third,
fourth, and fifth segments; the sixth segment is entirely black. The
male genitalia are also different from those of aimatis McAtee: in gilva
L. , each of the superior forceps is provided vAth two lamellate appen-
dages, while in aimatis McAtee, each forceps has orte lamellate appen-
dage (figs. 259, 260).
This species occurs in eastern as well as western central North
America, and is also knownfrom Europe; 65 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA); Whitla (CNC); Lethbridge (CNC); Castle
Mountain (CNC); Banff (UA and CNC).
Other localities - NORTHWEST TERRITORIES: Cameron Bay, Great Bear Lake (CNG).
BRITISH COLUMBIA: Robson (CNC); Co'^per Mt. (CNC); Tuktakamin (CNC); Vavenby (CNC).
WASHINGTON. OREGON. MONTANA: Lame. WYOMING: Lander (AMNH). COLORADO:
Empire; Estes Park. ARIZONA; St. Catalina Mts. (AMNH). ONTARIO: Sudbury (CNC);
Ottawa (CNC); Thor Lake (CNC); Fort Williams (AMNH); Macbeth (AMNH); Sault St. Marie;
Whitefish Point. QUEBEC: Fort Cologne (CNC); Cascapedia (CNC); Trinity Bay (CNC) ;
Abbotsford (CNC); Laniel(CNC). NEW BRUNSWICK: Bathurst (CNC); NOVA SCOTIA; Baddeck
(CNC). MASSACHUSETTS: Tyingsboro; Blanchard; Dedham; Beverly; Burgess. MICHIGAN:
Alpena; Dickinson.
Adisoemar to
53
Subfamily Leptogastrinae
In 1909 Back recorded only one genus of this subfamily in North
America north of Mexico. He presented a synopsis of 15 species . Later,
additional genera were erected; Tipulogaster By Cockerell (1913), Psylonyx
by Aldrich (1923), Beameromyia and Apachekolos by Martin (1957).
In Alberta, the subfamily is represented by one genus with two
species, Leptogaster aridus Cole and L. coloradensis James.
Genus Leptogaster Meigen
Leptogaster Meigen 1803 : 269. Type species: Asilus cylindricus De Geer
1776.
Gonypes Latreille 1805 : 309. Type species: Asilus cylindricus De Geer
1776.
This genus is recognized by the following combination of charac-
teristics: the wings are without bands or spots, with five posterior cells,
the legs are slender, but the femora are somewhat club-shaped (fig. 85),
and the pulvilli are absent.
Head silvery white tomentose; face narrow, epistoma broader;
frontnarrow, wider toward vertex; mystax present along epistomal mar-
gin; first antennal segment small, second wider, with short hairs on
apical lower and upper sides, third elongate and attenuate, style long,
slender, spine present (fig. 139); palpi one-segmented, shining, clavate,
borne on a tubercle (fig. 46); occiput convex on lateral sides, few hairs
present on lower side, few short bristles on upper side behind vertex.
Thorax white tomentose; mesonotum convex, slightly protruding anter-
iorly (fig. 64); mesonotal vittae present, not reaching hind margin; two
bristles present above wing base. Legs shining, pale orange; coxae
white pollinose; hind femora swollen distally; tibiae slender, hind pair
gradually thicker apically (fig. 85); basitarsi as long as second tarsal
segments; claws long, empodium half as long as claws; pulvilli absent.
Wings shorter than abdomen, covered with micr otrichiae; alula absent;
all peripheral cells open; third branch of media and anterior branch of
cubitus fused for a considerably long distance (fig. 163); second branch
of cubitus and second anal vein almost parallel; halteres brownish with
long stalk. Abdomen slender , elongate (fig. 102); second segment much
longer than first; posterior segments wider; posterior margin of first
with one or more pairs of bristles; superior forceps of male genitalia
with ventral excavation; ovipositor short.
Key to the Species of Leptogaster Meigen of Alberta*
Occipital bristles black; superior forceps of male genitalia with-
out spine-like projection apically aridus Cole
Occipital bristles white, pale, or tinged with color; superior for-
ceps of male genitalia with spine-like projection apically ... .
’"From Martin (1957).
54
Asilidae of Alberta
coloradensis James
Leptogaster aridus Cole
Leptogaster aridus Cole 1919 • 229.
According to Martin (1957), this species is easily recognized by
the characteristics of the male genitalia. A female specimen was col-
lected from Writing- on-Stone Provincial Park, an almost arid area,
where the vegetation was short grass and cacti. This species was also
found in association with Nerax bicaudatus Hine.
This species is known from Alberta, and according to Martin (1957),
is found along the Pacific coast and some localities in California; 10
sDecimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park (UA).
Other localities - WASHINGTON: Yelm (UA). OREGON: Mt. Hood. CALIFORNIA: Big
Bear Lake, Hannah Flats (AMNH); Idyllwild, San Jacinto Mts. (AMNH); Strawberry, Tuolumne
Co. ; Snowline Camp, Eldorado Co. ; Yosemite Nat'l Park; Whitney Portal, Inyo Co. ; Tanbark
Flat, Los Angeles Co. ; Glendale.
Leptogaster coloradensis James
Leptogaster coloradensis Ja.mes 1937 : 14.
Variation in the pollen color was described by Martin (1957).
This species ranges from Alberta to Kansas; one specimen was
examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Lethbridge (CNC).
Other localities - WYOMING. SOUTH DAKOTA: Cedar Canyon; Cottonwood; Buffalo;
Highmore; Presho; Kennebec; Desmet; Gettysburg. COLORADO: Boulder (type locality);
Berthoud Pass. KANSAS: Ellis Co. ; Sheridan Co.
Subfamily Asilinae
This subfamily is a highly specialized and complex group. Special-
ists have devoted much effort to defining the genera. The members of
this group inhabit various habitats, such as open grassland, sandy beach,
and near coniferous forest.
Key to the Genera of the Asilinae of Alberta
1, Wing with three submarginal cells (fig. 164) Promachus Lioew
Wing with two submarginal cells 2
2. Antennal style longer than third antennal segment (fig. 141) .... 3
Antennal style as long as or shorter than third segment (fig. 143)
4
3. Facial gibbosity very prominent, bulging on top (fig. 27); antennal
style, including spine, at least twice as long as third segment
(fig. 141); scutellum at base less than twice its length (fig. 70);
male genitalia longer than high (fig. 280); ovipositor almost
Adisoemarto
55
three times as long as seventh abdominal segment (fig. 114) ..
Nerax Hull
Facial gibbosity almost flat on top (fig. 26); antennal style one and
a quarter as long as third antennal segment (fig. 140); scutellum
at base twice as long as its length (fig. 69); male genitalia
higher than long (fig. 277); ovipositor less than twice as long
as seventh abdominal segment (fig. 113); ninth sternum provided
with spines (fig. 113) Proctacanthella Br omley
4. Scutellum with bristles (fig. 71, 72) Asilvs complex
Scutellum without bristles (fig. 73) Negasilus Curran
Genus Protnachus Loew
Promachus Loew 1848 : 390. Type species: Asilus maculatus F. 1775
Trupanea Macquart 1838 : 91. Type species: Asilus maculatus F. 1775.
Preoccupied by Schrank 1803, Diptera.
Telejoneura Rondani 1864 : 48. Unnecessary change of name.
Bactria Megerle (Ms) in Meigen 1820 : 307. Nomen nudum.
Promachus can be easily recognized by the character of the wing
venation: three submarginal cells, with the radial crossvein near the
middle of the first (fig. 164).
There is one species, dimidiatus Curran, known in Alberta.
Promachus dimidiatus Curran
Promachus dimidiatus Curran 1927 : 87-88.
According to Curran (1927) this species can be easily confused
with bastardi Macquart, but is distinguished by the absence of black hairs
from the first abdominal segment of the male. By comparing two females
and one male of bastardi Macquart with six pairs of dimidiatus Curran, the
following characters, which are more or less constant, have been found
useful for distinguishing these two species: in dimidiatus Curran, the
metanotal hair s and the hair s on the third abdominal segment, are entirely
white, while in bastardi Macquart, the metanotal hairs are mostly black,
and the hairs on the third abdominal segment are mixed black and white.
Both species have black bristles on the first abdominal segment.
This species ranges from Alberta to Manitoba, south to New Mexico;
holotype (CNC) and 18 additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Orion (UA and CNC); Milk River (CNC); Dunes (CNC).
Other localities - MANITOBA: Aweme (type locality; CNC), Onah (CNC). COLORADO:
Master, Plainview (USNM). NEW MEXICO: Arroyo, Pecos R iver (USNM) .
Genus Proctacanthella Bromley
Proctacanthella Bromley 1934 : 96. Type species: Asilus cacopilogus Hine
1909.
This group was separated from Asilus by Bromley (1934) on the
56
Asilidae of Alberta
basis of the absence of hairs from the metanotal slopes, and by the cy-
lindrical ovipositor, which is provided with a circlet of spines.
There are five species of this genus, all Nearctic, and in Alberta,
this genus is represented by one species, cacopiloga Hine.
Proctacanthella cacopiloga Hine
Asilus cacopilogus Hine 1909 I 165-166.
Proctacanthella cacopiloga Bromley 1934 : 96.
Hine ( 1909)placed this species and /eucopo^on Williston in the Rhadiurgus
group of the genus Asilus L. Curran (1924) was the first to realize that
Asilus cacopilogus Hine was different from the other species of Asilus L. ,
and suggested it belonged to Erax Scopoli. The males of this species are
easily recognized by the shape of the male genitalia (figs. 277-279), but
the females are hard to distinguish from one another.
This species ranges from Alberta to T exas, and east to New Jersey;
32 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA); Orion (UA); Writing-on-Stone Provincial
Park (UA).
Other localities - MANITOBA: Aweme (CNC). WYOMING: Lance Creek (AMNH). NEB-
RASKA: Mitchell (CNC); Fromont. COLORADO: White R ock (AMNH) ; Wray (AMNH); La Junta
(AMNH); Pueblo (AMNH); Olney (AMNH); Fort Collins (AMNH). KANSAS: Clark Co.
OKLAHOMA: Admore. TEXAS: Forestburg (AMNH); Rosser. ILLINOIS; Havana. INDIANA:
Mineral Springs (CNC). NEW JERSEY: Anglesea.
Genus Nerax Hull
?Verax Hull 1962 : 476. Type species: Asilus aestuans L. 1767.
Erax Macquart 1838. Type species: Erax rufibarbis Macquart 1838.
Efferia Coquillett 1893, Type species: Efferia candidus Coquillett 1893.
This group is readily recognized by the form of the male genitalia
(fig. 280) and the ovipositor (fig. 114), the shape of the third antennal
segment and the style (fig. 141), and the wing venation (figs. 165-168).
This genus is confined to the New World. In Alberta, TVerax is re-
presented by four species.
Key to the Species of Nerax Hull of Alberta
1. Third vein of wing branched before tip of discal cell (figs. 165,
166) 2
Third vein branched beyond tip of discal cell (figs. 167, 168). . . .3
2. Acrostichal line with long hairs and bristles; last two segments
of abdomen of male silvery pollinose, hairs sparse, few in
number; abdomen of female yellowish pollinose
bicaudatus Hine
Acrostichal line without hairs and bristles, but with short setulae;
all abdominal segments of male silvery pollinose, hairs num-
erous, long, except for a longitudinally-directed bare’ line at
Adisoemarto
57
middle; abdomen of female silvery white pollinose
canus Hine
3. Tibiae black subcupreus Schaeffer
Tibiae orange-brown costalis Williston
Nerax bicaudatus Hine
Erax bicaudatus Hine 1919 • 138.
Nerax bicaudatus Hull 1962 : 478,
This species is recognized by the wing venation, the pollen pattern
of the males and the females, and the presence of comparatively long
hairs on the acr ostichal line of the mesonotum. The color of the bristles
varies from entirely white to entirely black in almost every arrangement.
In the males, this. variation occur s in the ocellar bristles, frontal hairs,
few bristles of the mystax, upper occipital bristles, presutural dorso-
central bristles, postalar bristles, mesopleural bristles, and scutellar
bristles. In the females, the variation is less obvious. This species
inhabits arid grassland, pastures, and short grass areas with cacti. It
has been found associated with Stenopogon neglectus Bromley a.nd Leptogaster
aridus Cole.
This species ranges from British Columbia to Manitoba, and south
to Texas; 65 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Drumheller (UA); Wardlow (UA); Medicine Hat (UA and CNC);
Burdett (UA); Manyberries (UA); Orion (UA and CNC); Comrey, Milk River Valley (UA);
Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park (UA); Lethbridge (UA and CNC),
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Summerland (UA), MANITOBA: Aweme (CNC),
COLORADO, TEXAS: Amarillo; Plainview; Hereford; Coyote Lake, Bailey Co,
Nerax canus Hine
Erax canus Hine 1916 : 22.
Nerax canus Hull 1962 : 478.
This species is similar to bicaudatus in the wing venation (figs. 165,
166), but is distinguished by other characters: the acrostichal bristle-
like hairs are absent, the abdomen is evenly silvery white pollinose in
both sexes, and the ocellar bristles are two in number (six in bicaudatus
Hine).
This species ranges from British Columbia to California. I have
not seen Alberta specimens, but Strickland (1946) included this species
in his list; 14 specimens were examined.
Localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Kamloops (CNC); Seton Lake (CNC); Nicola (CNC);
Lone Pine (CNC) ? Vernon (CNC); Oliver (CNC), CALIFORNIA: CrescentCo, (USNM); Mariposa
(USNM); Westgabd Pass Plateau (USNM); Ivfidway (USNM); Sierra Nevada (USNM); Antioch
(USNM),
Nerax subcupreus Schaeffer
Erax subcupreus Schaeffer 1916 : 66.
58
Asilidae of Alberta
Nerax subcupreus Hull 1962 : 478.
This species belongs to the carinatus group (Hine 1919), in which
the acrostichal mane is present, and the costal and the subcostal veins
of the wings of the males are slightly bent (fig. 167). This species ranges
from Alberta to Arizona, and from Colorado westward to California;
holotype (USNM) and nine additional specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA and CNC).
Other localities - IDAHO: Victor (AMNH). WYOMING: Stewart R. Sta. (AMNH).
COLORADO: Alamosa (AMNH); Electra Lake (AMNH). ARIZONA: Prescott (type locality;
(USNM). CALIFORNIA: Essex (AMNH).
Nerax costalis Willi ston
Erax costalis Williston 1885 : 64,
Williston (1885) included this species in his key, but did not describe
it, Aldrich (Hine 1919) and Hull (1962) did not recognize this species,
but it is accepted by some other authors. It is similar to shbcupreus
Schaeffer, but readily distinguished by its orange-brown tibiae.
This species ranges from Alberta and Saskatchewan, south to
Colorado; seven specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBER TA: Medicine Hat (UA) ; Lethbridge (CNC) ; Oldman R iver, Lethbridge
(CNC).
Other localities -SASKATCHEWAN: Rockglen (CNC). MONTANA. WYOMING. COLORADO.
The Asilus Complex
This complex probably includes several related genera, but no
attempt is made to separate them. All of the species involved in this
discussion are treated under the name Asilus Linnaeus.
There are 12 species of this complex present in Alberta.
Key to the Species of the Asilus Complex of Alberta
1. Apical margins of abdominal segments provided with distinct bris-
tles 2
Apical margins of abdominal segments without bristles 9
2. Femora black, at most only with apical reddish brown or yellow
bands 3
Femora reddish brown or yellow on posterior sides
delusus Tucker
3. Posterior margin of eighth sternum of abdomen of the male extended
into a subtriangular lobe, provided with tuft of'hairs; ovipositor
three to four times as long as sixth and seventh segments to-
gether (figs. 115, 116) occidentalis Hine
Posterior margin of eighth sternum of abdomen of male not exten-
ded; ovipositor at most twice as long as sixth and seventh seg-
ments together 4
4. Four scutellar bristles ca//idus Williston
Adisoemarto
59
Two scutellajr bristles, sometimes with additional small ones ... 5
5. White bristles on poster o-ventral side of front tibia 6
Black bristles on poster o-ventral side of front tibia 8
6. Antennal style two-thirds as long as third antennal segment
erythocnemius Hine
Antennal style less than half as long as third antennal segment. .
7
7. Male genitalia and eighth sternum of abdomen of female orange;
penis as in figure 297; black hairs on sternum of abdomen of
female mesae Tucker
Male genitalia and eighth sternum of abdomen of female dark brown;
penis as in figure 300; white hairs on eighth sternum of ab-
domen of female cumbipilosus new species
8. Ventral side of front femur with rather stout black bristles
paropus Walker
Ventral side of front femur with pale long hairs and pile
snowi Hine
9. Metanotal slope without pile or hairs auriannulatus Hine
Metanotal slope with pile or hairs 10
10. Posterior sides of femora reddish brown aridalis new species
Femora uniformly black 11
11. Mystax and mesonotal pile black nitidifacies Hine
Mystax and mesonotal pile white gramalis new species
Asilus delusus Tucker
Asilus delusus Tucker 1917 : 92.
This species is readily recognized by the color of the femora:
black on the anterior sides, orange on the posterior sides. Another
species, aridalis n. sp. , has the same color pattern of the legs, but the
abdomenis without bristles on the posterior sides. Antennal style slen-
der, as long as third segment (fig. 142). Upper side of mystax black,
lower side white; bristles on mesonotum and legs mostly black; two
black scutellar bristles present; superior forceps of male genitalia
twice as long as gonopods (fig. 282).
This species ranges from Alberta southward to Arizona, and from
Utah eastward to Kansas; seven specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Medicine Hat (UA and CNC); Lethbridge (UA).
Other localities - MONTANA. UTAH: Glacier Lake (USNM). COLORADO. KANSAS.
ARIZONA: Santa Rita Mts. (USNM); Chiricahua Mts. (USNM).
Asilus occidentalis Hine
Asilus occidentalis Hine 1919 : 147-148.
This species is readily recognized by the presence of a lobe-like
extension on the posterior margin of the eighth sternum of the abdomen
of the male (figs. 115, 116), and the ovipositor is three to four times as
long as the sixth and seventh abdominal segments together.
This species ranges from British Columbia to California, and the
60
Asilidae of Alberta
presence of this species in Alberta is doubted. Strickland (1938) might
have based his record on a misidentified specimen of Asilus callidus
Williston; six specimens were examined.
Localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Royal Oak (CNC); Aspen Grove (CNC); Nicola Lake,
Merritt (UA); Keremeos (UA); Victoria (CNC), OREGON: Antelope Mt. , Harney Co. (UA).
CALIFORNIA. NEVADA.
Asilus paropus Walker
Asilus paropus Walker 1849 I 455.
This species is similar to callidus Williston and erythocnemius Hine.
It is distinguished from callidus Williston by the number of the bristles
present on the scutellar mar gin (figs. 71, 72), and from erythocnemius Hine
by the size of the antennal style (figs. 143, 144). This species also re-
sembles snowi Hine, but is distinguished by the presence of stout bristles
on the ventral side of the front femur, instead of hairs and pile (figs.
82, 83).
This species ranges from Alberta to New Mexico, and eastward
to New Hampshire and Connecticut; 64 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Bilby (UA); Golden Spike (UA); Devon (UA); Cypress Hills (UA);
Calgary (CNC).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Saskatoon (CNC); Skipton (CNC). MANITOBA:
Teulon (CNC); Melita(CNC). ONTARIO; Ottawa (CNC). QUEBEC: Hull (CNC); Aylmer (CNC).
NOVA SCOTIA: DigbyCo. (CNC). NORTH DAKOTA. WYOMING. UTAH. CALIFORNIA. NEW
MEXICO.
Asilus callidus Williston
Asilus callidus Williston 1893 : 75.
This species can be easily mistaken for occidentalis Hine, but can be
distinguished by the absence of a lobe-like projection from the eighth
sternum of the abdomen of the male; the female has a comparatively
short ovipositor. The male genitalia of the two species are slightly dif-
ferent from one another (figs. 283-286). This species inhabits open
spaces near or within coniferous forests. In Alberta, this species has
been found in numbers together with Stenopogon inquinatus Loew. It ranges
from Bi-itish Columbia to Massachusetts, southward to California and
Utah. In Alberta it is not found in the prairies. It is probably a boreal
and subalpine species; 169 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Lac la Biche (UA); Opal (UA); Tawatinaw (UA); Bilby (UA);
Golden Spike (UA); Jasper, Lake Celestine (UA); Gorge Creek (UA); Flat Creek (UA); Banff
(CNC); Banff, Lake Minnewanka, Davil's Gap Trail (UA); Nordegg (UA); Seebe (DE); Cowley
(CNC); Coleman, Lake Island (CNC) ; Waterton Lakes (CNC) .
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA. WASHINGTON. OREGON. CALIFORNIA: Colville,
R ock Creek (CNC) ; Coalinga (CNC); Carson Pass (CNC); Lone Pine (CNC). NEVADA: Ormsby
Co, (USNM). UTAH: Zion Nat'l Park (USNM). MASSACHUSETTS: Springfield (USNM) ,
Adisoemarto
61
Asilus erythocnemius Hine
Asilus erythocnefhius Hine 1919 : 163.
This species resembles callidus Williston, but it is paler, yellowish
pollinose, and it has only two scutellar bristles. It is distinguished
from other species by the length of the antennal style (fig, 144). The
pollinose excresence of a number of specimens is bright golden yellow
instead of yellowish, and the mesonotal vittae are clearly defined blackish
brown. All other characters are the same. This species is found in
open grassland or in the open spaces within the parkland or coniferous
forests. It ranges from British Columbia to Wyoming, and east to Mas-
sachusetts and Maryland; 126 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Peace River (UA); Lac la Biche (UA); Edmonton (UA and LMK);
Consort (UA); Rosebud (UA); Cassils (UA); Oyen (UA); Medicine Hat (UA); Orion (UA); Many-
berries (UA); Burdett (UA); Lake Newell, Kinbrook Island Provincial Park (UA); Scandia (UA);
Cypress Hills (UA); Lethbridge (UA); Seebe (UA); Waterton (UA).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Trinity Valley (CNC); Prince George (CNC).
QUEBEC: Natashqua (CNC). MASSACHUSETTS. MARYLAND. MONTANA. WYOMING.
Asilus snowi Hine
Asilus snowi Hine 1919 l 160,
This species is similar to paropus Walker, but the ventral side of
the front femur is provided with hairs and pile only, and is without bris-
tles.
This species occur s mainly in eastern central North America, from
South Dakota to Kansas, eastward to Nova Scotia, and south to Virginia.
The presence of this species in Alberta is doubted, but Strickland (1938)
listed it, possibly on the basis of misidentified specimens; 13 specimens
were examined.
Localities - ONTARIO: Ottawa (UA). QUEBEC: Hemmingford (CNC). NOVA SCOTIA:
Truro (CNC). CONNECTICUT: Cornwall; Hamden; Stratford; Marlborough; Wallington;
Stamford. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Little Falls (USNM), VIRGINIA: Great Falls (USNM) .
ILLINOIS: Fort Sheridan (UA).
Asilus nitidifacies Hine
Asilus nitidifacies nine 1919 : 165,
This species is recognized by the black mesonotal pile, and also
by the shape of the superior forceps of the male genitalia (fig. 288).
The wings are evenly covered with microtrichiae, and brownish mar-
kings are absent from the middle of the subcostal cell (fig. 169). This
species is mostly found on the edges or in the open spaces of coniferous
forests. It ranges from British Columbia to Oregon, eastward to
Quebec; 19 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Cross Lake Trail (UA): Flatbush (UA); Opal (UA) ; Banff (UA);
Flat Creek (UA); Moraine Lake (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Terrace (USNM); Ainsworth (USNM). OREGON:
Mt. Hood (USNM), ONTARIO: Larder Lake (CNC). QUEBEC: Seven Isles (CNC) .
62
Asilidae of Alberta
Asilus auriannulatus Hine
Asilus auriannulatus Hine 1906 : 29.
This species is easily recognized by the color pattern of the legs.
The legs are mostly orange-yellow, but the coxae are black, the front
and the middle femora are black on the anterior basal two-thirds. The
male genitalia are easily distinguished from those of the other species
(figs. 291-294).
This species ranges from Alberta, British Columbia, south to
California; 21 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Seebe (DE); Banff (UA and CNC); Gorge Creek (UA); Waterton
(CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA: Fernie (CNC) ; Mara (CNC) . OREGON: Prineville,
Hood River (USNM), CALIFORNIA. WYOMING.
Asilus mesae Tucker
Asilus mesae Tucker 1907 : 92.
This species is easily recognized by the orange color of the male
genitalia and of the eighth sternum of the abdomen of the females. This
species is similar to erythocnemius Hine, but can be distinguished by the
size of the antennal style: less than half of the third antennal segment
in mesae Tucker, and more than two-thirds in the latter. It is also
similar to cumbipilosus new species. For details, see under cumbipilosus ,
In Alberta, this species inhabits the grasslands of the paririe.
This species ranges from British Columbia and Alberta, southward
to Colorado; 23 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA: Drumheller (UA) ; Lake Newell, Kinbrook Island Provincial Park
(UA); Medicine Hat (UA); Manyberries (UA); Taber (CNC).
Other localities - BRITISH COLUMBIA; Oliver (CNC). IDAHO: Bear Lake (CNC); Paris
(CNC); Mt. Pelier (CNC). WYOMING: Green R iver (CNC) ; R ock Springs (CNC) ; R awlins (CNC) ;
Carbon Co. (CNC). UTAH: Benson(CNC); Snowville (CNC). COLORADO: Pagosa Spring (CNC);
(CNC); Regnier (CNC); White Rock (CNC); Walsenburg (CNC); Grand Junction (CNC); Animas
(CNC). KANSAS.
Asilus cumbipilosus new species
This species is markedly similar to mesae Tucker, and is distin-
guished by differences in the male genitalia and the ovipositor. The
other characters are more or less similar in both species. These two
species occur in the same habitats. Other characters, except male
genitalia and ovipositor, similar to those of mesae Tucker; male genitalia
dark brown; penis with short arms, as long as penis sheath (fig. 300);
ovipositor dark brown, eighth sternum of abdomen of female with white
hairs.
The name cumbipilosus hSiS been chosen, because of the appressed
hairs present on the legs. This species is an inhabitant of short grass
prairie.
Holotype: Male, Etzikom Coulee, Alberta, 3 . VIII . 1963 (J. &C.D.
Sharplin and S. Adisoemarto); deposited in CNC.
Adisoemarto
63
Paratypes: three females, same data as for holotype; one female.
Welling, Alberta, 19. VII. 1922 (H. L. Seamans); one male Medicine Hat,
Alberta, 8. VII. 1932 (F.S. Carr); one female, Orion, Alberta, 9. VII,
1950 (E.H. Strickland); two n;iales, two females, Kinbrook Island Pro-
vincial Park, Lake Newell, Alberta, 10. VI. 1964 (S. Adisoemarto); all
are deposited in UA.
Asilus aridalis new species
This species is more or less easily recognized by the greyish pol-
linose body, and distinguished from mesae Tucker and cumbipilosus new
species by the absence of the bristles from the posterior sides of the
abdominal segments and the color pattern of the femora.
Male. Head yellowish - grey pollinose; gibbosity from about the
middle of face; mystax white with few black hairs on top; antennae black,
first segment one and one half times as long as second, third segment
attenuate apically, as long as first two together; style about two-thirds
as longas third antennal segment (fig. 145); frontal hairs white; ocellar
hairs black; occipital bristles mostly white, mixed with a few black on
upper side; beard and pile on lower side of proboscis white; palpi black,
long, one- segmented, white haired; proboscis black. Thorax yellowish
grey pollinose; pile white; hairs on postsutural dorsocentral area, on
scutellum, and on metanotal slope, white; mesonotal setulae white, black
onacrostichal line; mesonotal bristles black, two pr esuturals, two intra-
alars, onepostalar, and five dor socentrals; two scutellars black; meta-
pleural bristles white. Legs with coxae greyish pollinose; pileand hairs
on front and middle coxae white; anterior sides of femora black, pos-
terior sides reddish yellow, provided with appr ess ed, short, white setu-
lae, and long white hairs also present on ventral sides; tibiae orange-
yellow, black on tips, with appressed, short, white setulae and golden
tomentum on antero- ventral sides of front pair and on posterior sides of
hind pair; tarsi orange-yellow, black haired, tomentum present as con-
tinuation from tibiae; claws black; empodia as long as claws, black;
femoral bristles white, tibial bristles mostly black; tarsal bristles
entirely black. Wings hyaline, microtrichiae light brownish; halteres
greyish yellow, black tinged. Abdomen greyish, pollinose, brownish
markings on mid-dorsum of each segment; hairs white, on first seg-
ment erect, appressed on the remaining; white bristles present on sides
of first segment; male genitalia reddish brown (figs. 301-303).
Female. Most characters, similar to those of male, different in
the followings: mystax mostly black, white bristles only on epistomal
margin; hairs on first two antennal segments black, few white on dor-
sal sides; frontal hairs black; mesonotal setulae entirely black; bris-
tles on legs mostly black; dorsal abdominal hairs black; ovipositor
black, twice as long as seventh abdominal segment, black haired.
This species is called aridalis , because the specimens live in the
arid areas. The habitat of this species is similar to that of cumbipilosus
new species.
Holotype: Male, Dinosaur Park, Steveville, Alberta, 9. VI. 1964
64
Asilidae of Alberta
{S. Adisoemarto) ; deposited in CNC.
Allotype: Female, same data as for holotype; deposited in CNC.
Paratypes: one male, two females, same data as for holotype
(UA); male, female, Kinbrook Provincial Park, Lake Newell, Alberta,
10. VI. 1964 (S. Adisoemarto) (UA); two males, female, Scandia, Al-
berta, 20. VI. 1956 (E.E. Sterns) (CNC); female. Medicine Hat, Alberta,
16. VII. 1956 (E.E. Sterns) (CNC); male, Lethbridge, Alberta, 4. VII.
1923 (H. E. Grey) (CNC); female, Lethbridge, 6. VII. 1956 (E.E. Sterns)
(CNC); male, female, Lethbridge, 7. VII. 1956 (E.E. Sterns) (CNC).
Asilus gramalis new species
This species is similar to mesae Tucker and cumbipilosus new species,
but is readily distinguished by the absence of the bristles from the pos-
terior sides of the abdominal segments. It is distinguished from aridalis
new species by the golden pollinose body and entirely black femora.
Total length ranges from 9. 0 mm to 13. 0 mm.
Male. Face, front, and vertex golden yellow pollinose; gibbosity
from about the middle of face; mystax mostly white, three black bris-
tles present on top and few on lower corners; antennae black, first two
segments black haired, third segment tapers apically, one and a half
times as long as first two together; style one-third as long as third an-
tennal segment (fig. 146); frontal hairs white; ocellar hairs black; oc-
cipital bristles entirely white; beard white, pile on lower side of pro-
boscis white; palpi black, long, one- segmented, black haired; proboscis
black. Thorax golden yellow pollinose, pile, hairs, and bristles mostly
white; hairs on mesonotum not setula-like, more or less erect; black
hairs present on space between humeri and dor socentral area; mesonotal
postalars, and six dor socentrals (eight on right side), mostly black; two
scutellars black; metapleural bristles white. Coxae golden yellow pol-
linose, anterior pairs with white pile and bristles; femora black, red-
dish brown streaks present on ventr o-posterior sides, with appressed,
short, white setulae, and a row of white bristles on ventral sides; tibiae
reddish brown, black on tips, with appressed, short white setulae, and
golden tomentum on antero- ventral sides of front pair, and on posterior
sides of hind pair, bristles white; tarsi reddish brown, white haired,
tomentum present as continuation from tibiae, bristles mixed black and
white; claws black, empodia orange-yellow. Wings hyaline, micro -
trichiae brownish; halter es slightly brownish yellow. Abdomen greyish
yellow pollinose; hairs white, appressed; bristles white, present only
on sides of fir st segment; male genitalia reddish brown; superior forceps
one and a half times as long as gonopods (figs. 304-306); hairs white.
Female. Similar to male; ovipositor black, one and a half times
as long as seventh segment, black haired.
This species has been named gramalis , because the specimens live
in grass fields. The habitat of this species is similar to that of aridalis
and cumbipilosus.
Holotype: Male, Scandia, Bow River, Alberta, 10. VI. 1964 (S.
Adisoemarto) in copula with allotype; deposited in CNC.
Adisoemarto
65
Genus Negasilus Curran
Negasilus Curran 1934 : 184.
This genus is distinguished from Asilus complex by the absence of
the scutellar bristles. The other character s are not different from those
of the Asilus complex.
The genus is monotypic.
Negasilus belli Curran
Negasilus belli Cur ra.n 1934 : 184.
This species is similar to Asilus cumbipilosus new species, but is
easily distinguished by the absence of the scutellar bristles and the bris-
tles on the posterior margins of the abdominal segments. The genitalia
are also different. A female specimen from Lethbridge, Alberta differs
slightly from the others in the following respects: occipital bristles
bleck, frontal hairs black, body with golden yellow pollen, brighter than
in the other specimens; kept in CNC.
This species ranges from Alberta to Colorado, and west to Califor-
nia; 25 specimens were examined.
Localities - ALBERTA; Consort (CNC); Claresholm (CNC); Bow Island (CNC): Cypress
Hills (UA); Scandia (CNC); Taber (CNC); Lethbridge (CNC).
Other localities - SASKATCHEWAN: Assiniboia (CNC). WYOMING: Laramie (USNM).
COLORADO: Creede (USNM). UTAH: Laketown (USNM); Manila (USNM). NEVADA: Fallon
(AMNH). CALIFORNIA: Cedarville (USNM); Lake Mono Co. (AMNH).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. G. E. Ball, who
has guided this study, for his helpful suggestions and his valuable aid in
the preparation of this manuscript. I would also like to thank Dr. C. H.
Martin for his valuable suggestions and help in identification. I wish to
offer my sincere appreciation to the following entomologists and insti-
tutions, from which I have received loaned material: Dr. P. H. Arnaud,
Jr., California Academy of Sciences; Mr. Don Elliott, For est Entomology
and Pathology Laboratory, Calgary, Alberta; Dr. M. T. James, Wash-
ington State University; Mr. L.M. Kenakin, Department of Entomology,
University of Alberta; Dr. G. Steyskal, United States National Museum,
Washington, D.C.; Dr. J. R. Vockeroth, Canada Department of Agri-
culture, Ottawa, Ontario; Dr. W. W. Wirth, United States National
Museum; Dr. P. Wygodzinsky, American Museum of Natural History,
New York, N. Y. I express gratitude to the External Aid Office, Ottawa,
for support in this project through scholarship. Finally, I would like to
extend my gratitude to Mr . RobinE. Leech, with whom lengthy discus sions
were held, and from whom some ideas, directly or indirectly, have
been derived and applied herein.
66
Asilidae of Alberta
REFERENCES
Aldrich, J. M. 1923. New genera of two-winged flies of the subfamily
Leptogastrinae of the family Asilidae. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 62
(2466) : 1-6.
Alex, A. H. 1936. Notes on robber flies (Asilidae) preying on honey
bees in the San Antonio area during 1936. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc.
42 : 170-172.
Allan, J.A. 1943, Res. Counc. Alberta Rep, 34, Prts, I-V, ; 11-196,
Back, E.A. 1904. New species of North American Asilidae. Can. Ent.
36 : 289-293.
Back, E.A. 1909. The robber flies of America, north of Mexico, be-
longing to the subfamilies Leptogastrinae and Dasypogoninae .
Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 35 : 137-408, 11 pi.
Baker, R . H. 1939. A list of robber flies from Coahuila, Mexico (Dip-
tera ; Asilidae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 34 : 167-170.
Banks, N. 1917. Synopsis of the genus Z)a.sy //A (Asilidae) . Bull. Brooklyn
ent. Soc. 12 : 52-55.
Banks, N. 1920. Descriptions of a few new Diptera. Can. Ent. 52 :
65-67.
Bellardi, L. 1861, Saggio di Ditterologia Messicana. Mem. Reale
Accad. Sci. Torino, ser. 2, 21, pt. 2, reprint 11-88, 2 pi.
Bezzi, M. 1910a. Revisio systematica generis dipterorum Stichopogon .
Ann. Mus. Nat. Hungarici 8 : 129-159.
Bezzi, M. 1910b. Un nouvo genere di Asilidi dell 'America centrale.
Boll. Lab, Zool. Portici 4 ; 175-179, 1 fig.
Bezzi, M. 1927. II genere Cyrtopogon (Dipt., Asilidae) in Italia e nelP
Artogeo. Mem. Soc. ent. ital. 5 : 42-70.
Blanton, F. S. 1939. Collecting notes on the family Asilidae (Diptera).
Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 34 : 229-235.
Bristowe, W. S. 1924. A bee-eating dragonfly, and a spider- eating
asilid fly. Ent. mon. Mag. 60 : 150-151.
Bromley, S. W. 1929. Notes on the asilid genera Bombomima and Lap/jr/a
with descriptions of three new species and two new varieties (Dip-
tera). Can. Ent. 61 ; 157-161.
Bromley, S, W. 1931. New Asilidae, with a revised key to the genus
Stenopogon Loew (Diptera). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 24 : 427-435.
Bromley, S. W. 1934. The robber flies of Texas (Diptera,Asilidae) .
Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 27 : 74-113.
Bromley, S, W. 1937. The genus Stenopogon Loew in the United States of
America (Asilidae : Diptera). J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 45 : 291-309.
Bromley, S. W. 1946. Guide to the insects of Connecticut. Pt. VI.
The Diptera or the true flies of Connecticut. Third fascicle.
Asilidae. State geol. nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 69 : 1-48, 1 pi.,
29 figs .
Bromley, S. W. 1950. Florida Asilidae (Diptera) with description of
one new species. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 43 : 227-239.
Bromley, S. W, 1951. Asilid notes (Diptera), with descriptions of 32
new species. Am. Mus. Novit. 1532 : 1-36.
Brooks, A.R. 1958. Acridoidea of southern Alberta, Saskatchewan,
Adisoemarto
67
and Manitoba (Orthoptera) . Can. Ent. 90, suppl. 9 : 1-92.
Brown, J. H. 1944. The spotted fever and other Albertan ticks. Can.
J. Res. D, 22 : 36-51.
Cockerell, T.D.A. 1913. A fossil asilid fly from Colorado. Entomol-
ogist 46 : 213-214.
Cole, F.R. 1916. New species of Asilidae from southern California.
Psyche, Camb. 23 : 63-69, 3 pi., 6 figs.
Cole, F.R. 1919. New Oregon Diptera. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. , ser.
4, 9 ; 221-255.
Cole, F.R. and J. Wilcox. 1938. The genera Lasiopogon Loew and
Alcxiopogon Cur ran in North America (Diptera-Asilidae) . Ent. Amer.
18 : 1-84, 3 pi.
Coquillett, D. W. 1893a. Synopsis of the asilid genus Anisopogon . Can.
Ent. 25 : 20-22.
Coquillett, D. W. 1893b. A new asilid genus related to Erax . Can. Ent.
25 : 175-177.
Coquillett, D. W. 1898. Synopsis of the asilid genus Osprioccrus . Ent.
News 9 : 37.
Coquillett, D. W. 1904. Diptera from southern Texas with descriptions
of new species. J.N. Y. ent. Soc. 12 : 31-35.
Costa, A. 1883. Miscellanea entomologica. Atti Accad. Sci. Napoli,
ser. 2, 5 ; 1030.
Cresson, E. T. 1920. Description of a new species of the asilid genus
Pogosoma (error for Pogonosoma) , Ent. News 31 : 211-215.
Curran, C.H. 1922. New Diptera in the Canadian national collection.
Can. Ent. 54 : 277-287.
Curran, C.H. 1923. Studies in Canadian Diptera. R evision of the asilid
genus Cyrtopogon and allied genera . Can. Ent. 55 : 92-95, 116-125,
132-142, 169-174, 185-190, 6 pi.
Curran, C.H. 1924. On the generic position of Asilus cacopilogus Hine
(Asilidae). J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 32 : 73.
Curran, C.H. 1927. Description of Nearctic Diptera. Can. Ent. 59 i
79-92, 5 figs.
Curran, C.H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera.
The Ballou Press. New York, N.Y.
Enderlein, G. 1914. Dipter ologische Studien. XI. Zur Kenntnis trop-
ischer Asiliden. Zool. Anz. 44 : 241-263, 8 figs.
Hine, J.S. 1906. Two new species of Diptera belonging to Asilinae.
Ohio J. Sci. 7 : 29-30.
Hine, J.S. 1909. Robber flies of the genus Asilus. Ann. ^;nt. Soc. Amer.
2 : 136-170, 2 pi. , 43 figs.
Hine, J.S. 1916. Descriptions of robber flies of the genus Erax. Ohio
J. Sci. 17 : 21-22.
Hine, J.S. 1919. Robber flies of the genus Erax. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer.
12 : 103-154, 3 pi. , 60 figs.
Hull, F.M. 1962. Robber flies of the world. The genera of the family
Asilidae. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 224, 2 parts.
Jaennicke, J.F. 1867. Neue exotische Dipteren. Abh. Senkenberg.
Ges. 6 : 311-405, 2 pi.
James, M. T. 1934. Taxonomic notes on some Colorado Asilidae. Pan.
68
Asilidac of Alberta
Pacif. Ent. 10 : 83-86.
James, M.T. 1937. The genus Comanivlht Curran (Diptera, Asilidae).
Pan. Pacif. Ent. 13 : 61-63.
James, M. T. 1938. A systematic and ecological study of the robber
flies (Asilidae) of Colorado. Univ. Colorado Stud. 26 : 70-74.
Johnson, C. W. 1900. Some notes and descriptions of seven new species
and one new genus of Diptera. Ent. News 11 : 323-328.
Jones, P. R . 1907. A preliminary list of the Asilidae of Nebraska with
description of new species. J’rans. Amer. ent. Soc. 33 : 273-286.
Latreille, P.A. 1805. Histoire naturelle, generate et particulier c, des
crustaces et des insectes. 14 : 305-309.
Einnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. Regnum Animate. 10th ed.
Loew, H. 1847. Ueber die europaischen Rauberfliegen (Diptera Asilica) .
Linn. Ent. 2 : 348-568.
Loew, H. 1848. Same title. Ibid. 3 : 386-495.
Loew, H. 1862. Diptera Americae septentr ionalis indigena. Centuria
2 : 185-232.
Loew, H. 1866. Same title. Ibid. 7 : 1-54.
Loew, H. 1872. Same title. Ibid. 10 : 49-115.
Loew, H. 1874. Neue nordamerikanische Dasypogonina. Berl. ent.
Zeitschr. 18 : 353-377.
Macquart, P. J.M. 1838. Dipteres exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus.
Mem. Soc. Sci. Agric. Arts, Lille 1 : 5-207 : 14 pi.
Macquart, P. J.M. 1846. Same title. Ibid. SuppL 1 : 5-238, 20 pi.
Macquart, P. J.M. 1849. Same title. Ibid. Suppl. 4 : 5-175, 14 pi.
Martin, C.H. 1957. A revision of the Leptogastrinae in the United States
(Diptera, Asilidae). Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist. Ill : 347-386,
55 figs .
Martin, C.H. 1959. The //o/opo^on complex of North America, excluding
Mexico, with the descriptions of a new genus and a new subgenus
(Diptera, Asilidae). Amer. Mus. Novit. I960 : 1-40, 21 figs.
Martin, C.H. 1965. Distribution patterns and corrected identifications
of Asilid species reported as common to North and South America
(Diptera : Asilidae). Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 91 : 1-37.
McAtee, W. L. 1918. Key to the Nearctic species of the genus Laphria
(Diptera, Asilidae). Ohio J. Sci. 19 : 143-170, 2 pi. , 26figs.
Meigen, J. W. 1803. Ver such einer neuen Gattungs eintheilung der euro-
paischen zweifliigeligenlnsekten. VII. Mag. Insektenkunde 2: 259
-281.
Meigen, J. W. 1820. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten euro-
paischen zweifliigeligen Insekten. Achen.Vol. 2 : 239-345, pi. 20, 21.
Melander, A. L. 1923a. The genus Cyrfopo^on (Diptera;Asilidae). Psyche,
Camb. 30 : 102-119.
Melander , A . L. 1923b. The genus Lasiopogon (Diptera; Asilidae) . Psyche^
Camb. 30 : 135-145.
Melander, A. L. 1923c. Studies in Asilidae (Diptera) . Psyche Camb
30 : 207-219.
Melin, D. 1923. Contribution to the knowledge of the biology, meta-
morphosis and distribution of the Swedish Asilids, in relation to
the whole family of Asilids. Academical Dissertation. Almqvist
Adisoemar to
69
& Wiksells Boktryckeri AB. Uppsala.
Moss, E. H. 1955. The vegetation of Alberta . Bot, Rev. 21 : 493-567.
Odynsky, W. 1962. Soil zones of Alberta, as published by Alberta soil
surveys. Map. Revised. Department of Extension, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Osten- Sacken, C.R. Baron von. 1877. Western Diptera : Descriptions
of new genera and species of Diptera from the region west of the
Mississippi and especially from California. Bull. U. S. Geol.
Geogr. Sur. Terr. 3 : 189-354.
Poulton, E. B. 1906. Predaceous insects and their prey. Part 1. Trans,
ent. Soc. Lond. 1906 : 323-409.
Rondani, A.C. 1856. Dipter ologiae italicae prodromus 1 : 1-126.
Rondani, A.C. 1864. Dipterorum species et genera aliqua exotica revisa
et annotata, novis nonnullis descriptis. Arch. Zool. Anat. Fisiol.
3 : 1-99, 1 pi.
Say, T. 1823. Description of dipterous insects of the United States. J.
Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia 3 : 9-54, 7 3-104,
Say, T. 1824. In W. H. Keating: Narrative of an expedition to the sour ce
of the St. Peter's River, Lake Winnepeek, Lake of the Woods 1823
under the command of Major Long. (Say : 268-378).
Strickland, E. H. 1938. An annotated list of the Diptera (flies ) of Alberta.
Canad. J. Res. D 16 : 175-219.
Strickland, E. H. 1946. An annotated list of the Diptera (flies) of Alberta.
Additions and corrections. Canad. J. Res. D 24 : 157-173,
Tucker, E. S. 1907. Some results of desultory collecting of insects in
Kansas and Colorado. Kansas Univ. Sci. Bull. 4 : 51-112.
Walker, F, 1849. List of specimens of dipter ous insects in the collection
of the British Museum. Part 2 : 231-484.
Walker, F. 1851. Characters of undescribed insects in the collection
of William Wilson Saunders, Esq. Ins. saundersiana 1 : 76 - 156
2 pi.
Walker, F. 1851. Characters of undescribed insects in the collection
of W. W. Saunders. Trans, ent. Soc. Lond. ser. 2, 5, part 2:
268-334.
Walker, F. 1868. In J. K. Lord: The naturalist in Vancouver Island
and British Columbia.
Wiedemann, C.R.W. 1828. Aus ser eur op’aische z •./ eifliigelige Insekten,
als Fortsetzung des Meigenschen Werkes. 1 : 1-608, 7 pi.
Wilcox, J. 1941. New Heteropogon with a key to the species (Diptera,
Asilidae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 36 : 50-56.
Wilcox, J. and C. H. Martin. 1936. A review of the genus Cyrtopogon
Loew in North America (Diptera-Asilidae) . Ent. Amer. 16 : 1-85,
5 pi.
Williston, S. W. 1884. On the North American Asilidae (Dasypogoninae,
Laphriinae), with a new genus of Syrphidae. Trans. Amer. ent.
Soc. 11 : 1-35, 2 pi.
Williston, S. W. 1885. On the North American Asilidae (Part II) . Trans.
Amer. ent. Soc. 12 : 53-76.
Williston, S. W. 1886. Dipter ological notes and descriptions. Trans.
Amer. ent. Soc. 13 : 287-307.
70
Asilidae of Alberta
Williston, S. W. 1893. Newor little known Diptera. Kans. Univ. Quart.
2 : 59-78.
Fig. 1; map of Alberta showing ecological regions (after Moss 1955 and Brooks 1958) and col-
lecting sites . 1, Prairie; 2, Boreal Forest; 3, Subalpine and Montane; 4, Parkland and Boreal-
Cordilleran.
Adisoemarto
71
Figs. 2-19 head; 2 Stichopogon argenteus Say, 3-4 S. trifasciatus Say, 5-7 Lasiopogon terricola Johnson,
8-9 h. cinereus Cole, 10 Ospriocerus abdominalis Say, 11 Stenopogon coyo(e Bromley, 12 S. obscmiventris
Loew, 13-15 S. inquinatus Loew, 16-17 Holopogon albipilosa Curran, 18-19 Cyrtopogon distinctitarsus new
species .
72
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. Z0-Z8 head; ZO-ZZ Nicocles utahensis Melander, Z3-Z4 Pogonosoma stricklandi new
Z5 Laphria Scorpio McAtee, Z6 Proctacanthella cacopiloga Hine, Z7-Z8 A'erax bicaudatus Hine.
species,
Figs. Z9-37 mouthparts; Asilus calHdus Williston, 29 labrum epipharynx, ventral aspect, 30
cross-section of proboscis, 21-33 hypopharynx, 34 maxillary blade, 35 maxillae and labium,
ventral aspect, 36 palpus, 37 labium, dorsal aspect, 38 apical part of labium, Laphria janus McAtee,
39-40 cardostipites and palpi, 41 Leptogaster aridus Cole, lateral aspect.
47
Figs. 42-47 palpus; 42 Stenopogon obscvriventris Loew, 43 Eucyrtogpogon incompletus new species, 44
Nicocles ute/iensjs Melander , 45 Heteropogon wilcoxi James, 46 Leptogaster aridus Cole, 47 Pogonosoma stricklandi
new species.
Figs, 48-53 Asilus callidus Williston, 48-50 head, 51 thorax, lateral aspect, 42 same, dorsal
aspect, 53 prothorax, anterior aspect, 54 Stenopogon neglectus Bromley, prothorax, 55 same, dorsal
aspect, 56 Stichopogon trifasciatus Say, thorax, lateral aspect; Ba, basalare; cx, coxa; e, eye
em, epimeron; es, episternum; gb, gibbosity; gn, gena; h, humerus; hp, hypopleuron; ht,
haltere; msn, mesonotum; msp, mesopleuron; mtn, metanotum; mtp, metapleuron; pc,
posterior callus; pn, pronotum; pp, pteropleuron; ps, presternum; pst, prosternum; ptn,
postnotum; s, suture; Sa, subalare; sc, scutellum; sp, spiracle; spl, sternopleuron.
Adisoemarto
75
Fig, 57 Lasiopogon cinereus Cole, wing; A, anal vein; Ac, anal cell; Ax, axillary cell; B, basal
cell; Be, basal costal cell; C, costal vein; Cc, costal cell; Cu, cubital vein; D, discal cell;
hv, humeral vein; M, medial vein; m, medial crossvein; Me, marginal cell; m-cu, medio-
cubital crossvein; P, posterior cell; R, radial vein; r-m, anterior crossvein; Sc, subcostal
vein; See, subcostal cell; Sm, submarginal cell.
76
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. 58-59 male genitalia; 58 Lestomyia sabulonum Osten Sacken; A, lateral aspect; B, dorsal
aspect; C, ventral aspect; D, aedeagus; E, proctiger; 59 Lasiopogon quadrivittatus Jones; ae,
aedeagus; cl, clasper; gp, gonopod; ha, hypandrium; hpr, hypandrial process; pgr, proctiger;
ss, superior forceps.
Figs. 60-63 proboscis; 60 Stenopogon inquinatus Loew, 61 Eucyrtopogon incompletus new species, 6Z
Pogonosoma stricklandi new species, 63 Laphria Xanthippe Williston; 64 Leptogaster aridus , thorax, lateral
aspect.
Adisoemarto
77
Figs. 65-66 prothorax, anterior aspect; 65 Stichopogon trifasdatus Say, 66 Lasiopogon cinereus Cole;
67-73 scutellum; 67 Lasiopogon trivittatus Melander, 68 L. ripicola Melander, 69 Proctacanthella cacopiloga
Hine, 70 N erax bicaudatus Hine, 71 Asilus paropus Walker, 72 dsi7us ca///dus Williston, 73 Negasilus belli
Curran; 74-88 leg; 74 Lasiopogon quadrivittatus Jones, 75 Nicocles utahensis Melander, front tibia and
tarsus, 76 same, hind tibia and tarsus, 77 Comantella fallei Back, front tibia and tar sus , 78 Cyrtopogon
auratus Cole, front tibia and tar sus, 79 Cyrtopogon auripilosus Wilcox and Mar tin, hind leg, 80 Cyrtopogon
willistoni Curran, middle tarsus, 81 Cyrtopogon //neo^arsus Curran, front tibia and tarsus, 82 Asilus
paropus Walker , 83 Asilus snowi Hine, front femur.
78
Asilidae of Alberta
Fig, 84 Holopogon albipilosus Curran, hind leg; 85 Leptogaster aridus Cole, same; 86 L. aridus Cole, last
tarsal segment; 87-105 abdomen; 87 Stichopogon fn/asc/a^us Say, ?, 88 Lasiopogon quadrhdttatus Jones,
$, 89-91 Stenopogon inquinatus Loew, eighth segment and ovipositor, 92 same, acanthophorite., 93
same, cf. 94-95 Nicocles utahensis Melander, d, 96 same, ?, 97 Cyrtopogon auratus Cole, d, dorsal, 98
same, lateral, 99 Laphria scorpio McAtee, d, dorsal, 100 same, lateral, 101, L. janus McAtee, ?,
102-103 Leptogaster aridus Cole, ?, 104-105 Asilus callidus Williston, ?,
Adisoemarto
79
114
Figs. 106-117 ovipositor; 106 Lasiopogon aldrichi Melander, specimen from Grant
107 same, specimen from Drumheller, Alberta, 108-119 Laphria Xanthippe Williston,
ridingsi Cresson, 112 Promachus c/lm/c//a^us Curran, 113 Proctacanthella cacopiloga Hine, 114
Hine, 115-116 Asilus ocddentalis Hine, d, 117 Asilus callidus Williston.
Co. , Oregon,
111 Pogonosoma
Nerax bicaudatus
8Q_ Asilidae of Alberta
Figs, 1 18- 140 antenna; 118 Lasiopogon c/nereus Cole, 119 L. prima newspecies, 120 L. a/cfnc/ii Melander,
specimen from Grant Co., Oregon, 121 same, specimen from Drumheller, Alberta, 122-123
Ospriocerus consanguineus Loew, 124-125 O. abdominal is Say, 126 Stenopogon inquinatus Loew, 127 Holopogon
a/6/p/7osus Cur ran, 128 Lestomyia sabulonum OstenSacken, 129 Nicocles utahensis Melander, 130 Heteropogon
wilcoxi James, 131 Eucyrtopogon mcompletus new species, 132 Pogonosoma stricklandi new species, 133- 134
Laphria xan^ft/ppe Willi ston, 1 3 5 same , fir s t two s egments , dor sal, 1 3 6 L. sedales Walker, 137 L. scorpio
McAtee, 138 L. aeatus Walker, 139 Leptogaster aridus Cole, 140 Proctacanthel la cacopiloga Hine ,
Adisoemarto
81
Figs, 141—147 anteiMlia.J 141 Messm bi^andatms Himej 14Z A“®’nisiBS Xiickcr, 143 Asilms pairopviis Walker,
144 Asilem etymocmernikm Hiee, 145 A. anehillis mew species, 146 A. §rammlis mew species, 147 Wsgasihms
betm Cuirram.
Figs, 148-157 wing; 148 Lasiopogon prima new species, 149 same, cf. 3rd longitudinal vein, 150
stenopogon coyote Bromley, 151 same, cf. first posterior cell, 152 Holopogon nigripilosa new species,
153 Heteropogon wilcoxi James, 154 Lestomyia sabulonum Osten Sacken, 155 Cyrtopogon bimacula Walker, ?,
156 C. distinctitarsus new species, ?, 157 C. dasyllis Williston, ?.
82
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. 158-169 wing; 158 Eucyrtopogon comantis Curran, 159 E. diveTsipilosus Curran, 160 Pogonosoma
stricklandi new species, 161 Laphria Xanthippe Williston, 162 L. janus McAtee, 163 Leptogaster aridus Cole ,
164 Promachus dimidiatus Curran, 165 Nerax bicaudatus Hine, 166 N. canus Hine, 167 N. su6cupreus Schaeffer ,
168 N. costalis Williston, 169 Asilus nitidifacies Hine.
Adisoemarto
83
Figs. 170-193 male genitalia; 170-174 Lasiopogon terricola Johnson, 175-179 L. trivittatus Melander,
180 - 184 L. cinereus Cole, 185 - 189 L. prima new species 190 - 193 Ospriocerus consanguineus Loew.
84
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs, 194-207 male genitalia; 194-198 Stenopogon obscuriventris Loew, 199-203 S. rvfibarbis Bromley,
204-207 S; gratus Loew,
Adisoemar to
85
Figs. Z08-Z17 ijiale genitalia; Z08-Z1Z Stenopogon inquinatus 'Loew, Z13-Z17 S. neglectus Bromley,
86
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. 218-Z37 male genitalia; 218-221 Wo/opogon a/6jpiZosa Curran, ZZZ-ZZ5 Heteropogon wilcoxi Ja.mes ,
226-229 Cyrtopogon auratus Cole, 230-233 C. montanus Williston, 234-237 C. dasyllis Williston.
Adisoemarto
87
Figs. 238-258 male genitalia; 238-242 Eucyrtopogon albibarbis Curran, 243-247 Comantella fallei Back,
248-252 Laphria Xanthippe Williston, 253-258 L. Scorpio McAtee; cl, clasper; pci, pseudoclasper .
88
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. 259 Laphria aimatis McAtee, gonopod, 260 L. gilva Linnaeus, same, 261-263 ps eudoc lasper ,
261 L. janus McAtee, 262 L. vultur Osten Sacken, 263 L. sackeni Wilcox; 264-276 male genitalia;
264-267 Bombomima partitoT Banks, 268-270 fi. co/um6/ca_ Walker , 271-273 6. lernaldi Back, 274-276
B. posticata Say.
Adisoemarto
89
Figs. 277-Z90 male genitalia; 277-279 Proctacanthella cacopiloga Hine, 280-281 Nerax bicaudatus Hine,
282 Asilus delusvs Tucker, 283-284 A. occidentalis Hine, 284 gonopod and clasper, inner side, 285-
287 A. callidus Williston, 288-290 A. nitidifacies Hine.
90
Asilidae of Alberta
Figs. Z91-306 male genitalia; Z91-294 Asilus auriannulatus Hine, Z95-Z97 A. mesae Tucker, Z98-300
A. cumbipilosus new species, 301 - 303 A. aridalis new species, 304 - 306 A. gramalis new species.
91
Book Review
LACK, DAVID, 1966. Population studies on birds, v + 341 pp. 1 pi.,
31 figs. + 29 line drawings. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Price - 63 shil-
lings.
This represents a sequel to the author's 1954 work, "The Natural
Regulation of Animal Populations", now out of print. Thirteen longterm
studies of birds, with one exception all over four years duration, are
considered in detail and supported by eleven minor studies. Chapters
were sent to the principal authors concerned for criticism.
The main body of the work sets out these studies in detail and con-
clusions on bird populations are drawnfrom them. In the appendix, Lack
summarises chapter by chapter his 1954 work and points out various
errors and ideas which have not stood the test of time. He then goes on
to summarise his ideas on the natural regulation of animal populations
and to examine in some detail the theories of Andrewartha and Birch
(1954) and Wynne-Edwards (1962) and to explain why, in his opinion,
these do not fit the facts.
Lack's basic ideas, that animal populations are regulated by den-
sity dependent factors which have arisenasa result of natural selection,
are unchanged, and this book provides further evidence for these in res-
pect of birds. He admits that there is, at present, no conclusive evidence
for this, but points out that natural selection itself had to wait some 70
years for a satisfactory mathematical formulation (Fisher 1930) and until
1956 for a field proof (Kettlewell 1956).
Entomologists will find the evidence that birds have little influence
on insect populations in the breeding season but considerable effect on
overwintering ones, interesting.
Unlike most recent books on animal populations there are no for-
mulae representing hypothetical mathematical models, a point which
should please the less mathematically minded.
There are few errors, but Gough Island (p. 268) is in the South
Atlantic, not Pacific.
This book represents an important contribution to the literature on
animal populations and should be read by all interested in this field. All
ecologists should read the appendix.
The book is clearly printed on good quality paper and well bound.
Attractive line drawings by R obert Gillmor illustrate the principal species
referred to and some techniques.
Peter Graham
Re-printed from: Hooke^ R.^ 1665. Miarographia or some physiologioal descriptions
of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses idith observations and enquiries there-
on. Jo Martyn and Ja Allestry , London xxxiv + 246 pp.
Quaest
iones
entomologicae
A periodical record of entomological investigations,
published at the Department of Entomology, Uni-
versity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canoda.
VOLUME III
NUMBER 2
APRIL 1967
QUAESTIONES ENTOMOLOGICAE
A periodical record of entomological investigations, published at
the Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Volume 3 Number 2 3 April 1967
CONTENT S
Book review 93
Frank - A serological method used in the investigation of
the predators of the pupal stage of the winter moth,
Operophtera brumata (L. ) (Hydr iomenidae) 95
Book review 106
Sarai - Effects of temperature and photoperiod on embryonic
diapause in Nemobius fasdatus (DeGeer) (Orthoptera,
Gryllidae) 107
Book review 136
Book Review
ELTON, CHARLES S. 1966. The pattern of animal communities, xx
+ 412 pp. Methuen, London. Price - 90 shillings.
Much of the controversy in ecology has stemmed from the practice
of generalising too far from inadequate field data. As O. W. Richards
has said (A. Rev. Ent. 6 : 147, 1961), "disagreement probably arises
from the absence of sufficient evidence of the right kind". It is welcorhe,
therefore, to see two books (see p. 136), from the same publisher, which
although rather different in outlook and purpose are concerned basically
with providing 'evidence of the right kind'.
Charles Elton, the founder of 20th century animal ecology, has for
the last 20 years been leading an 'ecological survey' of Wytham Woods,
Oxford University's field site in Berkshire, England. This book is an
attempt to communicate some of the results from this project and to
analyse the pattern that exists there. Consequently, the results are
strictly applicable only to this area, although the methods and major
generalizations should be useful in studying other areas, at least those
with similar climate and physiography. The basis for the survey is the
classification of habitats devised by Elton and R.S. Miller (J. Ecol. 42 :
460-496, 1954), which is modified only slightly in this book. This clas-
sification, depending on Habitat Systems , divided laterally into F ormation
Types and stratified into Vertical Layers, with a small series of Qual-
ifiers, will be well known to ecologists. After five chapters which des-
cribe the methods of ecological survey and the history and geography of
Wytham Hill, there are twelve chapter s each dealing with the communities
associated with certain subdivisions of the habitat classification. The
emphasis is on terrestrial communities, although one chapter deals with
the small water bodies of woodland, and is predominantly concerned with
Wytham, although there is one chapter on the terrestrial maritime zone.
94
A chapter on dispersal and invaders and one on the whole pattern com-
plete the main body of the book.
The well known pyramid of numbers is now matched by an inverse
pyramid of habitats. Herbivorous animals tend to show greater special-
ization of feeding habits than do the carnivores or the scavengers, which
have a greater habitat range. The result is the gradual dissolving of the
primary community pattern, and the realization that every community
unit is partly interlocked with others. This 'girder system', it is sug-
gested, has a stabilizing influence on communities, for even simple com-
munities can exist in a stable state. The distinction is made, however,
between instability and vulnerability. Relatively simple communities
may be stable but at the same time vulnerable to invasions from other
areas. Complexity, then, at theintra-and inter-community level, would
seem to carry with it some stabilizing property.
One might ask, what has been achieved that might be considered a
basic advance in ecological theory during the 20 years of this ecological
survey, or even in the 40 years since the publication of Elton's first
book on ecology? Unfortunately the answer seems to support those who
consider that this approach to ecology has, for the present at least,
reached a plateau of usefulness. A tremendous amount of information
has been collected and this is perhaps an advantage of the ecological sur-
vey approach, in that the collection of data is not biased by preconceived
ideas on what is or is not important. But the sorting and analysis of this
data must present enormous problems, especially by the hand- sorting
method used at the Bureau of Animal Populations and to someone with
less experience and insight than Dr. Elton. In order even to confirm the
suggestions that have beenmade, the ecological survey may well have to
turn to themethodsof those who "have embarked on various quantitative
investigations", but who appear not to be held in very high esteem by the
author of this book.
Ecology as a socially useful science - as work for entomologists,
conservationists, wildlife management, and fisheries - will find little
guidance from ecological survey. The methods are quite at odds with
the urgency of practical problems. Even the generalizations from the
Wytham Survey are of little help. This book finishes with one page on
the regulation of numbers in populations and two and one half pages on
conservation. The plea, put forward in Elton' s previous book. The Ecology
of Invasions (1958), for preserving in as rich a form as possible all the
communities that may, be interspersed among croplands is repeated in
these last two pages. While the charm of diversification is obvious, the
solution of pest problems ("invaders of unfamiliar kinds ") does not neces-
sarily follow, as pointed out by M. J. Way (J. appl. Ecol. 3(suppl) : 29-32,
1966).
On the other hand, this book is a joy to read - it is an important work
of English literature which is informative and inspirational. It is 'scien-
tific natural history', andas such should recommend its elf to bothlaymen
interested in natural history and to professional biologists, especially
those who need reminding that animals live outside! An important part
of the book is the 88 beautiful black and white photographs which will be
particularly appealing to those acquainted with the British countryside.
Gordon Pritchard
A SEROLOGICAL METHOD USED IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE PREDATORS
OF THE PUPAL STAGE OF THE WINTER MOTH, operophtera brvmata
(L.) (HYDRIOMENIDAE)
J.H. FRANK Quaestiones entomologicae
Hope Department of Entomology 3 : 95 — 105 1967
University Museum, Oxford*
A method is described for producing antibodies to winter moth pupae antigens in experi-
mental rabbits. This method proved useful in estimating the extent of feeding by certain predatory
beetles on winter moth pupae when more direct methods were impracticable.
The populations of oak-defoliating Lepidoptera in a study area at
Wytham Wood, Berkshire, England have been under investigation for a
number of years by Varley and Gradwell (I960, 1963a, 1963b). One of
the most abundant of these species is the winter moth, which is in the
pupal stage under ground between the end of May and the end of November.
These pupae suffer a high mortality. Varley and Gradwell (1963a) sug-
gested that the principal causes of this mortality might be moles, mice,
and predatory beetles, particularly species of the carabid genera
Pterostichus and Abax and the staphylinid Philonthus decorus {Gr . ) , Laboratory
feeding tests (Frank 1967) showed that several species of Pterostichus j
Abax parallelepipedus (Pill, and Mitt. ) and Philonthus decorus wer e able to penet-
rate thecocoonand integument of the winter moth pupae and eat the con-
tents. In order to evaluate the number of pupae taken by each species of
predator a serological technique has beenused, based on that of Dempster
(I960) but with several differences.
This is not an exhaustive study of serological methods applied to
ecology, but indicates techniques which may be of use to those wishing
to study predator-prey relationships, and is a sequel to West (1950).
Crowle (1961) and Wieme (1965) are useful reference works.
Successive injections of a foreign protein into a mammalian blood
stream lead to the formation of antibody as described by Nossall (1964)
and Speirs (1964). These antibodies may be highly specific to individual
antigens. Usually a given antigen induces maximal antibody formation
when it is pure. If immunisation is done with a mixture of several anti-
gens it is less likely that an antibody will be formed against any given
antigen.
Experimental animals injected with winter moth proteins might
therefore be expected to produce antibodies specific to the proteins pre-
sent. Winter moth proteins derived from predator guts, if unaltered
by enzymatic action, should give an immune reaction with the antibody.
A white precipitate, suitable precautions having been taken, would be
proof of this reaction.
* Present address: Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Serological Method
96
PREPARATION OF MATERIALS
The account given here relates the steps used in the preparation of
an antiserum in experimental rabbits to winter moth pupal antigen. The
extraction of predator gut contents and the testing of these against the
prepared antiserum are recounted. After the results of this experiment,
I have explained the reasons for some of the processes and mentioned
some of the alternative methods available.
Collection of Predator Meals
Overnight catches from pitfall traps in the study area were made
twice a week in the summer and autumn of 1964 and 1965. Possiblepre-
dators were removed from the traps and killed with ethyl acetate vapour .
Immediately upon returnto the laboratory the crops of these possible
predators were removed and smeared onto filter papers. The filter
papers were labelled with date, species and sex of the animals, and
stored in a desiccator over phosphorus pentoxide. It is stated that such
smears have been stored for over 2 years without deterioration (Hall
etal. 1953).
The Experimental Mammals
Three adult male rabbits were obtained as experimental animals,
and a series of injections given. Mature animals are usually better anti-
body producers than young ones. Prolonged immunisation should be
avoided because of increase in the chance of antibody formation against
minor impurities, and because of the risk of production of sera with less
specificity.
Preparation of Antigen
Winter moth larvae were allowed to pupate in peat in rearing cages
in the laboratory. Within a few weeks of pupation, healthy pupae were
removed from their cocoons and weighed.
One g of pupae at a time was crushed by pestle and mortar in 25 ml
of 0. 9% sodium chloride solution. The contents of the mortar were
washed into a flat-bottomed flask, and a few drops of M / 1000 potassium
cyanide were added to precipitate melanins (Dempster I960). The flask
was left for 24 hr in a refrigerator at 5 C. The contents of the flaskwere
then divided equally between 2 centrifuge tubes and centrifuged for 1 hr
at 2500 rpm, and approximately 1400 g. The clear liquid was then passed
through a Seitz EK sterilising filter pad and collected in a thick-walled
flask with a side arm to which a filter pump was fitted. The total volume
of saline used in crushing the pupae and washing the mortar, flat-bot-
tomed flask, and centrifuge tubes was 50 ml.
Prior to filtration the filter -pad holder, thick-walled flask, and a
freeze-drying flask had been sterilised by autoclaving. The liquid in
the thick-walled flask was freeze-dried using liquid air. The freeze-
dried material was stored in a sterile, stoppered tube in a refrigerator
until needed. When sufficient antigen had been freeze-dried it was pooled
in order to minimise variation and re- stored.
Care in the preparation of the antigen is neces sary to avoid denatur-
F rank
97
ing the proteins present. Normal methods of drying may cause a change
in the protein structure. Sterile equipment is necessary to prevent bac-
terial attack and accidental introduction of foreign protein.
Production of Antiserum
Approximately 0. 2 g of the freeze-dried antigen was reconstituted
with 10 ml of distilled water, and the pH was buffered at 6. 8 by the ad-
dition of disodium hydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen sodium phosphate.
To the solution was added an equal volume of a mixture of the emulsify-
ing agent Arlacel 'A' and a light oil, Bayol 'F‘, in the ratio 3 : 17. The
liquids were thoroughly emulsified by drawing into and expelling from a
fine glass pipette. The emulsion was divided into three portions, as
accurately as pos sible, and injected subcutaneously into the experimental
animals at four sites: over each scapula and over each flank. All the
equipment was autoclaved before use, including the hypodermic syringes
and '20 gauge' needles.
Anintervalof a week was left before the second series of injections,
whena bacto-adjuvant was used. This antigen had the same composition
as that previously injected but contained, in addition, a suspension of
killed, dried Mycobacterium butyricum , This enhances the immune response
(Freund et al. 1948), A third and a fourth series of injections was given
at intervals of one week and using incomplete adjuvant, i, e, without
Mycobacterium butyricum .
After a further week rabbit no, 1 was starved fora day in an attempt
to eliminate some lipid material from the blood stream, and was then
bled from the ear. The reason for attempting to get rid of dissolved
lipids in the blood is that these might separate on standing and thus ob-
scure the reaction, A small cut was made in the posterior edge of the
ear under sterile conditions and 5 ml of blood were run into a 'Lusteroid'
plastic centrifuge tube. Lusteroid is a non-wettable commercial plastic
to which blood will not readily adher e. The blood was allowed to clot at
room temperature for one hour, and then the serum was centrifuged for
one hour at 2500 rpm to precipitate fibrin and blood corpuscles. The
clear serum was then decanted into a stoppered plastic tube.
The following day all three rabbits were given a fifth series of in-
jections. On the sixth day after the injections all the rabbits were starved
for 24 hours, and on the seventh day all three were bled from the ear.
The serum was treated as previously, decanted into labelled plastic
tubes and stored in a refrigerator.
Further injections were givenat intervals of 6 weeks to keep up the
level of immunity, Exsanguination was done every 3 weeks because it
was found that the serum tended to deteriorate after being removed from
and replaced in the refrigerator several times.
METHODS OF TEST
Preliminary Test
A very small volume of the clear serum was allowed to run up short
lengths of glass capillary tubing of 1 mm internal diameter and about 3
98
Serological Method
cm long, and the lower ends of the tubes were pushed into plasticine. A
small quantity of freeze-dried antigen was reconstituted with distilled
water, taken up in a micropipette, and layered carefully on top of the
serum in the capillary tubes. The tops of the tubes were then sealed
with plasticine and the tubes were allowed to stand at room temperature.
In less than 10 min a white precipitate had formed at the serum antigen
interface. This was taken to indicate that the rabbit had formed anti-
bodies against the winter moth antigen.
The Precipitin Test
Gamma globulins
Various methods have been used by different workers to test the
immune reaction between antigen and antibody and some of these are
mentioned in the discussion. Basically, the dried predator gut smears
are reconstituted with distilled water and reacted with either whole anti-
serum or a gamma globulin extract of the serum. All immunoglobulins
are antibodies, but gamma globulins constitute more than 90% of immuno
globulins, at least in human serum (Wieme 1965), Because several
antibodies are likely to be produced to the several components of the
water soluble protein from winter moth pupae, it is most probable that
some of these will be gamma globulins. By usinga solution of the gam-
ma globulins alone from the immune serum, a clearer liquid is produced
in which immune reactions are less likely to be obscured.
Method used
The method used in the following experiments was modelled on that
used by R.A. Webb and G, P, Gladstone at the Sir William Dunn School
of Pathology, Oxford. An agar of the following composition was made
up: ‘Bacto Agar' 3,0 g, sodium chloride 1.7 g, barbitone 1.48 g, gly-
cine 4. 5 g, distilled water 180 ml. The chemicals were weighed out in-
to a large beaker, and the distilled water was added and stirred well.
Difficulty was experienced in getting the barbitone to dissolve, so the
beaker and contents were autoclaved for about 10 min, which proved ef-
fective in dissolving the barbitone. Twenty ml of a 10“"^ M solution of
merthiolate (thiomersal) were added as an antibiotic, and the agar was
then filtered through sterile cotton wool and stored in sterile screw-
topped jars kept in an oven at 50 C. It was found that the agar tended to
deteriorate if kept for more than 10 days.
An apparatus was made up consisting of a levelling table onto which
was fitted a perspex tray. This tray held eight glas s microscope slides
side by side, and eight holes were punched through the tray, one under
the position of each slide and slightly towards one end. The sides of the
tray were of such height that when the microscope slides were in position
1 mm of the rim was exposed, and thus a layer of agar of depth 1 mm
could be poured over the slides.
Two rosettes, each containing a central and six peripheral well-
cutters were fixed into another piece of perspex which was of such con-
struction that it would run along the longitudinal rims of the tray, and
could be pressed down over each slide to cut wells in the agar. The
peripheral cutters of each rosette were each at a distance of 7,5 mm
F rank
99
from the central one, and each cut a circular well of diameter 2 mm.
The agar remaining in the wells was sucked out by a glas s pipette attached
to a filter pump.
In operation the agar is poured over 8 slides of standard thickness,
allowed to solidify, and then the wells are cut and their centres sucked
out. Antibody is put into the central well of each rosette, and antigen
into some or all of the outer wells by means of glass micropipettes. The
tray of slides is allowed to stand in a water - saturated atmosphere for
the precipitates to develop. After this, cuts are made carefully through
the agar at the edges of each slide, and the slides are removed from the
tray. The slides and agar layers on them are placed inpetri dishes con-
taining 0. 9% sodium chloride solution for 24 hr. Staining is done for
about 30 sec in a 5% solution of amido black in 60% alcohol, and the stain
is differentiated for about 24 hr in a 2% solution of acetic acid in distilled
water. The slides are then washed in tap water to remove the acid. A
photographic record of the precipitate lines may be made at this stage,
and a visual assessment of the strength and position of the lines is made.
The agar is now dried in situ on the microscope slides in an oven at
50 C. Alternatively the layer of agar may be separated from the micro-
scope slide and dried on a lantern slide for direct projection, or dried
on a stiff, glossy card for filing. During the staining process the slides
must be handled carefully in order not to loosen or damage the agar.
There is some danger of splitting of the agar during the drying process.
Incorporation of glycerol into the acetic acid solutionused for destaining
will prevent this but makes the agar somewhat sticky. Some very faint
precipitin lines are liable to disappear during the drying process.
Reconstitution of predator meals and testing
Strips of filter paper carrying the predator meals were cut out and
put into 2 ml centrifuge tubes, and 1 ml of 0. 9% sodium chloride was
added. The tubes were allowed to stand for several hours at room tem-
perature and then placed in a refrigerator overnight to allow solution of
the material. Before testing they were allowed to stand at room tem-
perature for 30 min.
The peripheral wells of each rosette were filled with antigen by glass
micropipettes and the central wells were filled with antiserum by the
same method. The micropipettes and tubes were sterilised for re-use
by boiling in dilute hydrochloric acid and washing in distilled water.
Control tests
Reconstituted antigens as well as fresh material from winter moth
pupae reacted with the prepared antiserum at full strength. In addition,
fresh material from pupae of the species Erannis aurantiaria (Esper) and
E. defoliaria (Clerck) reacted with the prepared antiserum, but much less
strongly. Antiserum from rabbit 3 gave much the strongest reactions.
It was then neces sary to ascertain whether the antis erum would react
with protein recovered from the guts of predators, and to discover how
long it took for the enzymatic action in the (predator) guts to denature
the protein so that it would not give the precipitin response.
In order to test this, a number of Abax parallelepipedus which had been
100
Serological Method
starved for a week, were confined in plastic containers, each with a
winter moth pupa. Feeding was observed, and when the greater part of
the pupa had been destroyed, the remains of the pupa were removed from
the container and a note was made of the date and time. Two specimens
of Ahax were killed every 24 hr after feeding, and their guts were re-
moved, smeared onto filter paper, dried and stored. For testing, after
allowing time for the soluble gut contents to dissolve, drops of this liquid
were tested against winter moth pupal antiserum. It was found that the
guts of those Abax which had been killed 24 hr after feeding gave the
strongest precipitin reaction, and the reaction diminished rapidly with
time, so that it was only just discernible for those individuals killed 96
hr after feeding.
Specimens of Pterostichus melanarius (111,) gave results identical to those
obtained from Abax specimens and it was assumed that specimens of
Pterostichus madidus (F. ) did not differ in this respect.
Specimens of both Abax and Philonthus decorus fed on larvae and pupae
of Phormia regina (Meigen) gave no precipitin reaction with winter moth
pupal antiserum, showing both the dissimilarity of this dipterous and
winter moth protein, and that it is not merely the presence of food in the
predator gut which causes the reaction, but the presence of winter moth
protein which is of importance.
The precipitin reaction of winter moth antiserum with winter moth
antigen, the latter either fresh or freeze-dried and reconstituted, gave
2 strong lines of precipitate, and occasionally a third, weak one, prob-
ably indicating that antibody had been formed against more than one pro-
tein, This formation of more than one line may have been an artifact
(Crowle 1961) due to change in temperature during the reaction or to
high antibody concentration but, since it occurred many times during the
course of the experiments the former explanation seems likely. The
quantity of antibody formed against any one of these proteins would pro-
bably be less than if a single pure protein had been injected, but there
were obvious difficulties in attempting to separate the various winter
moth proteins and it was unnecessary to do this for the purposes of this
study. In actual tests of predator gut contents, of course all lines were
found to be weaker than when using pure antigen, it was often found that
there was one strong line and a second barely discernible.
The antigen prepared from pupae of Erannis species gave only one
line which was in the same position as the strongest line formed by win-
ter moth antigen, but weaker than this, when tested against winter moth
pupal antiserum. The apparent similarity of these proteins shown by the
similar position of the precipitin lines seems to stress the affinity of the
genera Operophtera and Erannis, It should be possible to distinguish rep-
resentatives of the two genera by the difference in pattern of the lines
in the precipitin reaction if their antigens were concentrated enough,
but the antigens recovered from predator guts were dilute, A large
amount of Erannis protein taken from a predator gut could be confused
with a much smaller amount of winter moth protein from a similar source.
In this experiment it was necessary to consider that a small proportion
of the positive reactions was due to genera related to Operophtera , The
smallness of this proportion was partly because of the great numerical
F rank
101
superiority of winter moth larvae over those of related genera in 1964
and 1965 at Wytham, and partly because Operophtcra antigens gave much
stronger reactions with Operophtcra antiserum than did those of related
genera. These latter reactions, in many cases, were probably not de-
tected.
A fact emer ging is that Philonthus decorus ^ Quedius lateralis (F. ) and Nebria
brcvicollis (F. ) fed on adult winter moth in November 1964, and subs equently
tested against winter moth pupal antiserum did not give any indication
of a precipitin reaction. Similarly, an extract of adult winter moth pre-
pared in December 1965 did not react with pupal antiserum, whilst fresh
pupal antigen prepared on dates up to the middle of November continued
to give a strong reaction. It must be concluded that there is a rapid
change in protein structure just prior to adult emergence, or that the
proteins to which antibodies are formed lie in the pupal integument. The
former seems to be the more likely because the antiserum was prepared
against the water - soluble proteins of the winter moth pupa, and the pro-
teins of the pupal wall must be highly insoluble.
The criticism that antibody may be formed against plant material
in the gut of the winter moth larva, and present in the pupa, and which
may also be present in the guts of suspected predators, thus giving an
immune response, can be dismissed. The winter moth larva evacuates
its gut before pupation (Gradwelb per sonal communication). If this were
not the case then various plant materials would have to be tested against
the pupal antiserum.
It was found on testing the predator gut contents with undiluted anti-
serum, that other components of the serum in addition to gamma glob-
ulins tended to be deposited around the antibody well, and these to some
extent obscured the precipitate lines. Because of this, a solution of
gamma globulins was prepared by adding a saturated solution of ammo-
nium sulphate to whole serum (giving a concentration of about 50%) to
precipitate the gamma globulins, which were then centrifuged down and
redissolved in 0. 9% sodium chloride. In all experiments whole serum
was put into the central well of one rosette of each slide, and gamma
globulins into the central well of the other rosette. This would indicate
whether there were any antibodies present which were not gamma glob-
ulins and it also helped in orientating the slide after the staining proces s.
A plan of the distribution of the reagents was drawnat the beginning
of each test, and the precipitin lines were drawn on this when they be-
came apparent. I found it preferable to use only three of the outer wells
of each rosette for the precipitin lines to be at their clearest.
Absorption techniques
An absorption technique was used by Dempster (I960) to make his
antiserum more specific to the protein of his prey species. He found
that the precipitin reaction of his prey species, Phytodecta olivacea Forst.
was about 400 times as strong as the reaction to the Phytodecta antiserum
of Coccinella septempunctata L. , which also occurred in his study area. He
therefor e added just sufficient Coccinella material to precipitate the anti-
bodies to it, and then used the serum for his precipitin reactions. A
slight excess of Coccinella would greatly reduce the s ensitivity of the ser-
102
Serological Method
um to Phytodecta .
This method would have presented problems in the present experi-
ment because of the several related genera pre sent. Adequate sensitivity
was obtained without it. After precipitation from the serum of antibody
material common to the winter moth and to the various species of Erannis
and other related genera present in the study area, the antibodies re-
maining in the serum would probably produce very weak reactions with
winter moth pupal antigens . There would be practical difficulties in per-
forming accurately a series of absorption reactions. The population of
Erannis in the Study area was much smaller than that of the winter moth
so that its effects could be largely ignored.
RESULTS
Of 122 Abax parallelepipedus taken during the time the winter moth was
in the pupal state during 1964 and 1965, 21 gave a positive precipitin
reaction, indicating that they had fed on winter moth pupae not more than
4 days before they were captur ed. Six of 226 Philonthus decorus taken under
similar conditions had fed not more than 3 days before they were cap-
tured, The period after which winter moth pupal remains were no longer
detectable in Philonthus decorus was found to be 3 days, a shorter time than
for the carabid species tested. This is probably correlated with the
fact that the food of Philonthus decorus is ingested in liquid form and is more
easily digested. Three of 18 Pterostichus madidus and 1 of 5 Pterostichus
melanarius had fed within 4 days on winter moth pupae. No other species
of beetle and no beetle larvae gave positive results, but a male and a
female of the vole Clethrionomys glareolus Schr. taken in May 1965 were both
shown to have fed on winter moth. Usingthese figures and the population
sizes of the beetles it was possible to estimate the number of winter moth
pupae taken in a unit area by each species of predator, the number of
winter moth pupae per unit area having already been estimated (Frank
1967).
DISCUSSION
The winter moth protein giving the precipitin reaction seems to be
a complex of several proteins because, in well-defined reactions, three
distinct lines of precipitate could be seen. There are techniques for the
separation of proteins in such systems. Moving boundary electrophoresis
and zone electrophoresis can be used only when fairly large quantities
of the reagents are available. They allow proteins to be distinguished
by the rate at which these migrate towards an electrode in a conducting
solution.
The method of immunoelectr ophor esis (Williams I960) separates
the precipitin lines of the various proteins present. An agar plate is
used with a central, longitudinal trough filled with antibody. The antigen
is placed in two wells, one on either side of the trough, and the various
proteins in the antigen diffus e in a longitudinal direction because of elec-
F rank
103
trodes placed at either end of the plate. The antibody diffuses outwards
towards the antigen, and precipitin arcs are formed in various positions
on the plate depending upon the proteins present. By comparing the posi-
tions of the arcs, it is possible to determine whether two antigens are of
the same composition. This method would be of value in comparing the
proteins present in closely-related lepidopterous pupae, such as those
of Erannis and Operophtera ^ in an initial study. It would be too time con-
suming to use in routine sampling such as was done by simple diffusion.
In the preparation of the antiserum the incorporation of the antigen
in a water-in-oil emulsion prepared from paraffin oil (e. g, Bayol 'F')
and Arlacel (mannide monooleate) enhances and sustains antibody for-
mation and the alteration of sensitisation may occur concomitantly, but
theyappear to be distinct (Freund et al. 1948). The immune response is
not potentiated when vegetable oil is substituted for paraffin oil, nor when
the antigen is administered in an oil-in-water emulsion,
Dempster ( I960) used 0, 4% potas sium alum to precipitate the soluble
proteins so that they should diffuse more slowly into the blood stream
of the rabbit and thus sustain antibody formation, a method described by
Proom (1943).
The factors in promoting and sustaining the immune response are
probably prolonged absorption as well as the protection of antigens against
destruction and elimination, favourable cellular reactions about the anti-
genic depots, and the production of multiple foci of antibody formation
in lymph nodes (Freund et al. 1948).
The test method used by Dempster ( I960) was to dr aw a small volume
of the smear extract into a capillary tube, followed by an equal volume
of the antiserum. Because of density differ ences an interface is produced
where a white precipitate of antibody combined with antigen forms and
is viewed by indirect light against a black background. Clarity of the
liquids is essential for satisfactory results. The method has several
disadvantages. The precipitate formed is not permanent, and for recor-
ding purposes it is necessary to photograph thecapillary tubes and their
contents. The layering of the antisera must be done with extreme care
to obtain sharp interfacial division. Jarring of the tubes should be a-
voided; very fine precipitates easily become diffuse and may be lost due
to carelessness.
Oudin used a similar method, but coated the interior of the tubes
with a layer of agar (Williams I960). A layer of precipitate forms in
the agar and is less ephemeral thanin the first method described. When
several antigen - antibody systems are present, several layers of pre-
cipitate form at different levels in the tube depending upon the rates at
which the antigens diffuse into the agar. The drawbacks are the difficul-
ties inherent in the layering of the liquids and in the placing of the agar
coating, and also in obtaining a permanent record.
Leone (1947) followed Boyden and Defalco (1943) in using a more
elaborate method which has some of the drawbacks of the method used
by Dempster (I960), but gives a quantitative measurement. He used the
Libby photr onr eflectometer to measure the turbidity of the precipitin
reaction (Libby 1938). Here it is necessary to dilute the antisera by an
appropriate factor because of the weakness of the insect antigens. A
104
Serological Method
disadvantage was that the exact protein concentration had to be known in
all antigen solutions in order for the reaction titres to be comparable.
The technique developed by Ouchterlony (Williams I960) allows anti-
gen and antibody to diffus e into an agar-filled petri dish which originally
contains neither reagent. Small wells are cut in the agar and a few drops
of the antigen and antibody solutions are placed in these. The antigen
and antibody diffuse outwards towards each other at rates in proportion
to their concentration and diffusion coefficients. Where the antigen en-
counters its specific antibody a line or precipitate forms. The lines for
different antigens are distinctly separated because of differences in dif-
fusion rate. This clear separation of lines makes it possible to distin-
guish more reactions by this technique than with the Oudin tubes.
Various modifications of this basic Ouchterlony concept have been
used. Wadsworth (1957) devised a micro-immunodiffusion technique ,
which was further modified by Crowle (1958), based on theuseof a tem-
plate for cutting wells in the agar. Feinberg (1964) fur ther modified this
by floating a pattern-perforated disc of thin, rigid, transparent plastic
onto molten agar, and then allowing the agar to solidify in contact with
the disc. The disc is not subsequently removed from the agar, and the
reagents are applied at the apertures of the disc where agar is exposed.
The difference between this method and that of Wadsworth and Crowle is
that no holes are cut in the agar, and the disc does not need to be of such
thickness as to supply wells to contain the reagents. Antigens and anti-
bodies lie on the exposed agar and will notunder-run the disc because of
the effective seal formed.
Another method uses a similar technique to that of Wadsworth and
Crowle, but with cellulose acetate instead of agar. The cellulose ace-
tate strips used can be handled with less risk of damage during the stain-
ing process than can agar (Johnson era/. 1964).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 am indebted to Professor G.C. Varley for granting me facilities
for carrying out the study of which this was part. I thank Professor R.
A. Webb and Dr. G. P. Gladstone for their advice, and Dr. S. L. Sutton,
University of Leeds, for his collaboration. My gratitude is also due to
Mr. Peter Ford, Oxford University, for help in the inoculation of the
experimental rabbits, and to the National Environment Research Council
for financial support.
REFERENCES
Boyden, A. A, and DeFalco, R. 1943. Report on the use of the photron-
r eflectometer in serological comparisons. Physiol. Zool, 16 : 229.
Corcoran, A. C. (ed. ). 1952. Methods in medical resear ch. Year Book
Publishers, Chicago. Vol. 5.
Crowle, A. J. 1958. A simplified micro double-diffusion agar precipitin
technique. J. Lab. din. Med. 52 : 784.
F rank
105
Crowle, A. J. 1961. Immunodiffusion. Academic Press. 333 pp.
Dempster, J. P. I960. A quantitative study of the predators on the eggs
and larvae of the broom beetle, Phytodecta olivacea (Forster) using the
precipitin test. J. Anim. Ecol. 29 : 149-167.
Feinberg, J. G. 1964. A new device for immunopr ecipitation in agar
gels. Nature, Fond. 201(4919) : 631.
Frank, J, H. 1967. The insect predators of the pupal stage of the winter
moth. J. Anim. Ecol. (in press).
Freund, J, et al. 1948. Antibody formation and sensitisation with the
aid of adjuvants. J. Immun. 60 : 383.
Hall, R.R., Downe, A.E.R., Maclellan, C.R. and West, A.S. 1953.
Evaluation of insect predator-prey relationships by precipitin test
studies. Mosquito News 13 : 199-204.
Johnson, C. M. , Westwood, J.C.N. , and Beaulieu, M. 1964, A con-
tinuous-flow double diffusion technique with cellulose acetate. Na-
ture, Bond. 204(4965) : 1321-1322.
Leone, C.A. 1947, A serological study of some Orthoptera. Ann. ent,
Soc. Am. 40 : 417-433.
Libby, R . L. 1938. The photronreflectometer - an instrument for the
measurement of turbid systems, J. Immun. 34 : 71.
Nossall, G. J. V. 1964. How cells make antibodies. Scient. Am. 211 :
106-115.
Proom, H. 1943, The preparation of precipitating sera for the identi-
fication of animal species, J. Path, Bact, 55 : 419-426.
Speirs, R.S. 1964. How cells attack antigens . Scient. Am. 210 : 58-64.
Varley, G. G, and Gradwell, G.R. I960. Key factors in population stu-
dies, J, Anim. Ecol. 29 : 399-401.
Varley, G.C. and Gradwell, G.R. 1963a, Predatory insects as density
dependent mortality factor s . Proc. 16th Int. Congr. Zool. Washing-
ton 1 : 240.
Varley, G. G. and Gradwell, G.R. 1963b. The interpretation of insect
population changes. Proc. Geylon Assn, Adv, Sci. 1962, 18 : 142-
156.
Wadsworth, G. 1957. A slide microtechnique for the analysis of im-
mune precipitates in gel. Int. Archs. Allergy appl, Immun, 10 :
355.
West, A.S. 1950, The precipitin test as an entomological tool. Can,
Ent. 82 : 241-244.
Wieme, R. J. 1965. Agar gel electrophoresis. Elsevier, Amsterdam/
London/New York. 425 pp.
Williams, C.A. I960. Immunoelectrophoresis. Scient. Am. 202 : 130,
106
Book Review
EVANS, H. E, 1966. The comparative ethologyand evolution of the sand
wasps. 526 pp. Harvard University Press.
H. E. Evans is well known for his studies of various solitary wasps,
especially "sand wasps" (Nys soninae) . We find in this latter group a
particularly high proportion of very original, or specialized, or evolved
traits of behavior (some of which even suggest a comparison with social
or sub-social forms). We can mention for example: night clustering;
oviposition in an empty cell (instead of on a prey); special behavior re-
lated to the larva such as provisioning it day after day (instead of "mass
provisioning", prior to hatching of the larva); cell cleaning, etc. ; the
range of prey selection tends also to be wider than in many other groups
of Sphecids; some Microbembix accept all kinds of insects (occasionally
other arthropods, such as spiders, etc.) and are scavengers.
Thus the study of this group is particularly interesting perse and
also with respect to the evolution of some features in the entire group
of Sphecoidea (and perhaps even in some social or sub-social forms).
H. E. Evans has gather ed, discussed, compared, and evaluated car e-
fully the different elements of information concerning this group and at
times even other groups, when useful; he emphasizes also the need for
additional information and experimentation. The integration of these
various elements leads to a final general synthesis, and also to appealing
working hypotheses. The conclusions are established on a wide base in-
cluding for example morphology of adults, larvae and cocoons, fossils,
phylogenetic and zoogeographical considerations, and especially ecolo-
gical and ethological features . The illustrations and especially the photo-
graphs, are excellent and attractive.
This very good book is particularly interesting and useful for students
of the behavior of insects and the puzzling complexity of this at the level
of the higher Hymenoptera.
Andre L. Steiner
Department of Zoology
University of Alberta
Sarai
107
EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD ON EMBRYONIC DIAPAUSE
IN NEMOBIUS FASCIATUS (DE GEER) (ORTHOPTERA, GRYLLIDAE)
DARSHAN SINGH SARAI Quaestiones entomologicae
Department of Agriculture 3 : 107 — 135 1967
Courthouse, Kelowna, B.C.
The effects of temperature and photoperiod on invoking and terminating embryonic
diapause of Nemobius fasciatus were studied in relation to the adaptation of this cricket to
the long winter of a continental climate at 53 40’ N.
N. fasciatus ;'s univoltine in Alberta. Eggs undergo facultative diapause at the
termination of anatrepsis, overwinter, and hatch in early July of the succeeding year. There
are six nymphal instars; adults appear early in August and survive until frosts occur in late
October. Diapause appears to be induced mainly by the wide diurnal temperature range in late
summer. Middle aged females deposit higher percentages of diapausing eggs than younger or
older females. A high incubation temperature (29 C) suppresses diapause. Diapause is terminatejd
by exposure of pre-diapausing or diapausing eggs to temperatures of -15 C before incubation.
Heavy mortality occurs, however, in freshly laid eggs when they are exposed to 0 C. A temper-
ature of 5 C halts development of post-diapause eggs but this is resumed within 24 hours at
an incubation temperature of 29 C. Exposure of any stage to constant or varying photoperiod
does not apparently influence the incidence of diapause.
A single generation per year and resistance to low temperatur e^ at
least in the resting stages, are commonly found in insects which inhabit
high latitudes. In these regions climatic variations which are responsible
for these adaptations are very wide. In the resting stage, developmental
proces ses and metabolism are very much retarded. This phenomenon of
physiological rest or diapause, is followed by an active period of the life
cycle at the onset of favourable conditions . Danilyevsky (1965) attributes
the univoltine life cycle to the short duration of favourable conditions.
Where favourable conditions continue longer, insects are mostly multi-
voltine. Diapause in univoltine insects is mostly obligatory and in mul-
tivoltine species facultative (Andrewartha and Birch 1954, Lees 1955,
Danilyevsky 1965). In the former, diapause is commonly invoked by in-
ternal physiological processes regardless of the external conditions, but
the life cycle as a whole remains under the influence of temperature which
determines the breaking of diapause and also the duration of development
of the active stages. In multivoltine insects facultative diapause is mainly
controlled by external factors, such as photoperiod, temperature, food,
and humidity (Lees 1955, Danilyevsky 1965).
It was once believed (Readio 1931, Cousin 1932) that diapause was
invoked by unfavourable conditions in most insects. But the principal
stimulus for the inception of diapause is photoperiod, although temper-
ature, water, and diet may be involved (Harvey 1962). Although photo-
period has no direct effect on the development of insects, it may, through
the neurosecretory system, induce diapause immediately prior to un-
favourable conditions. The discovery of the dependence of the inception
of diapause on photoperiod was mainly the work of Kogure (1933) who
studied bivoltine races of Bombyxmori L. in Japan. Recent works include
those of Danilyevsky in 1948, 1949a and 1951, (cited in Danilyevsky 1965),
Dickson (1949), Lees (1955), and Corbet (1956),
108
Diapause in Nemobius
The present study was undertaken to determine how Nemobius fasciatus
(DeGeer), the striped ground cricket, is adapted to inhabit one of the
coldest locations in its distribution. As this adaptation is mainly through
embryonic diapause, this study is concerned with the effect of environ-
mental factors on induction and termination of diapause. This species is
omnivorous, as are most crickets, feeding on decaying organic matter
and leaves of grasses. Diet was discarded as a possible environmental
factor affecting diapause because crickets are general feeders . Similarly
water was eliminated, because eggs remain in moist soil from the time
of oviposition to hatching. T emperatur e and photoperiod were, therefore,
studied in various combinations.
Crickets were collected in 1964 in hummocky pastures near Atim
Creek 21 miles west of Edmonton city centre (53°40‘N, 113°50‘W). In
1965, another meadow two and a half miles from Atim Creek was used
because the previous field was flooded. Crickets break their metathoracic
legs easily if netted and to collect them uninjured the mouth of a wide-
mouthed fruit jar was put in front of adults and last instar nymphs which
were induced to jump into it. I sometimes collected 80 crickets in an
hour. It was easy to locate males by their sound. Each male was com-
monly found with one or two females. Young nymphs were collected in
the field with an aspirator. Crickets brought from the field were kept
in the laboratory in battery jars with rabbit pellets for food (Ghouri and
McFarlane 1958), inverted bottles of water plugged with absorbent cotton
for water supply, and strips of paper towels to increase the surface area
for walking and for hiding. About 2 0 to 3 0 crickets in sex ratio of one
were kept in each jar. Fresh moist soil in plastic petri dishes was pro-
vided for oviposition each 24 hours. Eggs were sieved out underwater in
a tray, damaged and small ones were discarded, others were put in plas-
tic petri dishes on a filter paper covering a thick pad of wet absorbent
cotton. These petri dishes were kept covered except for a few minutes
every day for observation. Eggs are highly susceptible to desiccation.
The cotton remained moist for about three weeks at 29 and 24 C and for
two months at 0, 5, and 15 C. A few drops of tap water were added when
needed. Dishes were marked on the cover and on the under surface with
the number of the experiment, the number of eggs, and the date of ovi-
position.
Eggs were observed after 24 hours for hatching. Newly hatched
nymphs were removed from the dish with an aspirator and counted as
they were transferred to a fruit jar. Egg shells were removed and
counted to check this.
Eggs for laboratory experiments were deposited by the crickets which
were collected in the field mainly in the first half of September, when
ovipositing adults were abundant. Eggs laid within 24 hours of the col-
lection of the crickets were used. Unless otherwise stated the experi-
ments of 1964 were repeated under similar conditions in 1965, on com-
parable dates.
Hogan's method (1959) for the Australian Acheta commodus Walker was
used to determine the stage of embryonic development at which diapause
occurs. The eggs were soaked in water in a watch glass for half an hour .
The water was then replaced by a mixture of two parts of glacial acetic
Sarai
109
acid, two parts of chloroform, and one part of absolute alcohol, for 25
minutes at 34 C. Eggs were then transferred to a mixture of one part of
glycerol and one part of 70 per cent alcohol. The embryo was then clearly
observed under the microscope without cutting sections or dissecting
eggs.
The percentage hatching of eggs shown in the results includes only
those which hatched within 13 to 15 days at 2 9 C or within 2 0 to 22 days
at 24 C, for non-diapausing or post-diapausing eggs. Throughout this
study these were the periods required for development without diapause
at these incubation temperatures. Diapause in many eggs results in a
prolonged hatching period. A typical curve of percentage hatching of
total eggs versus incubation days at 29 C is illustrated in fig. 1. Unless
otherwise indicated the limits of variation of controlled temperatures
throughout this work were less than ± 1 C.
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of hatching of eggs of N. fasciatus at an
incubation temperature of 29 C. N = 250.
The crickets from the vicinity of Edmonton were very kindly deter-
mined by Dr. R . D. Alexander to whom eight male and female specimens
with notes on habitat and a tape recording of the song were sent for this
purpose.
110
Diapause in Nemobius
DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD
N. fasciatus is recorded in wet localities over most of eastern North
America including Newfoundland and Florida. By putting together various
records of its distribution (Lugger 1897, Blatchley 1920, Fulton 1931,
Hebard 1930, 1936, Strohecker 1937, Ball et al. 1942, Alexander and
Thomas 1959j Vickery 1963) it is found that this species is distributed
from southern Canada to northern Mexico and east of the great basin in
the United States. Characteristically, it inhabits marsh borders and
other poorly drained grassy situations such as stream banks, meadows
and pastures. It is commonly associated with crab grass ( Digitaria sanguinalis
Scop. ) .
In the northern United States this cricket overwinters in the egg,
matures in July, and continues to sing until the last individuals are killed
by winter. In Ohio, the earliest recorded singing date is July 8 and the
latest November 14. In the University of Michigan Museum there are adult
specimens from central and northern localities of Michigan, the earliest
of which was collected on July 17, the latest on November 16. There are
also adult specimens which were taken in Florida every month of the
year (Alexander and Thomas 1959). N. fasciatus starts maturing before
the middle of June in the Piedmont area and coastal plains of North
Carolina and probably there are two to three generations per year at this
latitude (Fulton 1931). Near Edmonton in 1964 and 1965 the song of this
cricket was not heard before the first week of August or after the last
week of October,
Seasonal History at Edmonton
The seasonal history of N. fasciatus was studied inmeadows near Atim
Creek from the end of April to the end of October in 1964 and 1965. In
1964 eggs hatched from July 8 to 15, adults were first seen on July 30,
but there was no singing although the day was warm (22.7 C) and singing
starts a day or so after the last molt. A week later, the buzzy chirps
were very noticeable, Oviposition had started by August 10, andreached
a maximum between the last week in August and the middle of September
(fig. 2). There was heavy oviposition on warm and particularly on sunny
days, especially when this fine weather continued for two or more days.
Below 15 C there was little or no oviposition even in September. Fifth
and 6th instar nymphs were seen for the last time on October 10. Heavy
frosts in the third week of October killed most of the crickets and they
were heard last on October 24, a partly sunny day with afternoon temper-
ature 11.6 C.
In 1965 there were 7.48 inches of rainfall in June compared to 1. 04
inches in 1964 and 3, 15 inches normal for this month. Meadows near
Atim Creek were flooded from June 21 to August 10 and muddy until the
middle of September; plant growth reappeared by the end of the month.
Neither crab grass nor crickets were present. To test the viability of
eggs deposited here in 1964, soil samples were taken in October 1965
from sites where oviposition had been observed. No eggs sorted from
the mud by sieving under water hatched. Seasonal life history was ob-
served in the unflooded edge of a spruce grove to the north and in another
Sarai
111
meadow about 2, 5 miles away which dried early. It was similar to that
of 1964; singing was fir st heard on August 10, some adults were present
but 5th and 6th instar nymphs predominated. On September 24-25 0. 9
inches of snow fell and stayed fora day and a half. This snow and nightly
frosts from September 22 to 28 killed most of the crickets. Singing was
last heard on October 13, a sunny day with afternoon temperature 12.2
C. The adult population was maximum by the end of August in each year.
Fig. 2. Number of eggs deposited by N. fasciatus per week per female
caged outside, 1964.
Seasonal incidence of Diapause
Almost synchronous hatching of N. fasciatus in July, and overwintering
of the egg stage suggest a regulating mechanism by which the seasonal
rhythm of development is adapted to this climate. This mechanism could
be the changes in photoperiod or daily temperature during late summer.
An experiment was conducted to determine whether the changing photo-
period or temperature influenced the females to lay diapausing eggs.
Methods and materials
Adults were collected weekly from August 7 to October 10, 1964 and
kept in battery jars in screen cages of two cubic feet volume outside
under natural conditions of photoperiod and temperature. The locations
of the cages were selected to avoid artificial light and shadows from buil-
dings or trees . Wet soil in plastic petri dishes was supplied for oviposition
and renewed every 24 hours. Throughout the experiment eggs were sieved
out in water and incubated at 29 C inpetri dishes. In all 4,644 eggs were
112
Diapause in Nemobius
incubated at this temperature.
Three other batches of five hundred and fifty eggs each were incu-
bated at 29 C, 22 C, and 20 ±1.5 C respectively. Lots of about 100 were
started one week apart from August 16 to September 20. Temperatures
in the cages were recorded with thermographs. Data for Edmonton photo-
periods for the complete year were obtained from the Dominion Public
Weather Office, Edmonton.
Results
The percentage hatches (within 15 days) of eggs deposited during
succeeding weeks of the summer of 1964 and incubated at 29 Care shown
in Table 1. These results show no obvious correlation between the inci-
dence of diapause and any weather factor, except the difference between
day and night temperatures or amplitude of temperature variation. There
was over 50 per cent diapause whenever the amplitude of temperature
difference was greater than 16 C. Either the eggs within the female are
directly sensitive to changes in environmental temperature, or they are
influenced indirectly through some physiological mechanism in the female
that is affected by fluctuating temperatures. It is apparent from Table 1
too that in the fir St halves of August and October the number of diapausing
eggs is less thanin September. Thus a second factor contributing to the
percentage of diapausing eggs could be the age of females.
TABLE 1. The percentage hatch of eggs deposited in successive weeks
by N. fasciatus under natural conditions of temperature and photoperiod
and incubated at 29 C, 1964.
In the batches at different incubation temperatures the overall per-
centage hatch in 15 days at 29 C was 35.6. At 22 C no hatching occurred
within 25 days, 3. 5 per cent hatched in 60 days and 4. 3 per cent in 90
days. At 20 C there was only 3 per cent hatch in 90 days. Thus all the
eggs incubated at 22 C or 20 C diapaused. It can be concluded that con-
tinuous higher incubation temperatures suppress diapause. No significant
Sarai
113
differences due to starting dates were found.
Discussion
Differences in the dates of the first and last singing in Ohio^^ Michi-
gan, and Edmontonare probably due to the differencein temperatures at
these places. North Car olina is warmer than Ohio and Michigan, and two
to three generations per year are possible (Fulton 1931). In Florida the
temperature remains fairly high throughout the year and the variation in
the mean monthly temperatures for the years 1941-50 (World Weather
R ecords 1959) j is only between 11. 4 and 27. 7 C, which allows this cricket
to breed throughout the year . Fig. 3 shows a comparison of meanmonthly
temperatures at four localities with the type of life cycle at these places.
It appears that the number of generations per year at different latitudes
is in fact determined by the period of high temperature available.
Fig. 3. Meanmonthly temperatures (C) at different localities in relation
to voltinism in N. fasciatus. a Jacksonville, Florida - Multivoltine; A
Cincinatti, Ohio - Probably univoltine; • Detroit, Michigan - Probably
univoltine; x Edmonton, Alberta - Univoltine.
114
Diapause in Nemobius
Since the mean maximum temperature in Edmonton during August,
September, and October rarely goes above 22. 5 C there is no hatching of
eggs deposited earlier in the season which is in accordance with the
laboratory results (4. 3 per cent hatch in 90 days at 22 C). A few nymphs
which were seen in the late summer probably hatched late from the pre-
vious yearns eggs or were exceptionally slow in developing. This point
was cleared up during the study of the life history in the laboratory where
some nymphs developed exceptionally slowly and some died before reach-
ing maturity.
Gragg and Cole (1952) observed that there were veryhigh fluctuations
in the number of non-diapausing larvae in the blowfly, Lucilia sericata Meig.
throughout the summer months. They stated (p. 603) that there was no
obvious correlation between the fluctuations and any one weather factor.
The same appears to be true of N. fasdatus j so far as photoperiod, number
of eggs laid, or hours of bright sunshine are concerned. Fluctuations in
the number of diapausing eggs laid during succeeding summer months
were apparently due to the range of temperatures experienced by the fe-
males during the time of oviposition. Crickets which were exposed to a
range of temperatures favourable for embryogenesis (15. 5 to 27. 7 C),
or favourable for breaking diapause (0. 6 to 15. 5 C) laid less diapausing
eggs. A large number of diapausing eggs were laid by crickets exposed
to widely fluctuating temperatures (below 10 to above 20 C).
Many articles have been published which deal with the effect of sea-
sonal fluctuations in temperatures on the induction and termination of
diapause. It is generally accepted that diapause termination in most in-
sects needs low temperatures whereas embryogenesis in post-diapause
stages requires high temperatures to proceed. Ther e has been, however,
very little work done on the effects of daily fluctuations of temperature
on diapause. Kozhanchikov (1949) associated diapause in the Chinese
oak silkworm Antheraea pernyi Guer. with the effects of daily fluctuations
in temperature on the larvae. He found that all of the larvae transformed
into non-diapausing pupae when the daily temperature varied from 19 to
22 C at a mean rearing temperature of 20 C. However, with a range of
18 to 25 C at the same mean temperature 86 per cent of the larvae dia-
paused, and all the larvae diapaused when the daily fluctuations in tem-
perature were from 18 to 32 C, 15 to 30 C or 15 to 32 C. At a slightly
lower rearing temperature (17 C) all larvae underwent diapause when the
daily temperatures varied from 15. 2 to 25. 0 C, 14. 0 to 25. 0 C and 14. 0
to 30.0 C. Therefore, in Antheraea pernyi Guer. both the mean rearing
temperature and the range of fluctuation are important in invoking dia-
pause.
Browning (1952b) observed in Acheta commodus Walk. (= Gryllulus commodus )
that as the incubation temperature is raised, an increasing percentage of
the eggs develops without diapause. His observations are confirmed by
Hogan (1960a) and also apply to N. fasciatus .
Sarai
115
PRELIMINARY LABORATORY STUDY OF DEVELOPMENT
Effects of Photoperiod and Age on Diapause
Since the previous experiment did not show any relationship between
photoperiod and the incidence of diapause, another experiment was con-
ducted to verify those results by changing the photoperiod in the laboratory
while other conditions such as food, humidity, and temperature were
controlled. Another reason for this experiment was to determine whether
diapausing eggs are deposited in response to changing photoperiod ex-
perienced by adults or nymphs.
Methods and materials
Last instar nymphs of both sexes were collected on July 29, 1964
and kept in battery jars in four lots of 20. These jars were placed in a
growth chamber provided with fluorescent and incandescent lights oper-
ated by time switches, and a humidity control. Two groups of these were
exposed to changing photoperiod and the other two served as controls kept
in constant darkness. The photoperiod corresponding to September 1 in
Edmonton was fir st used in order to break the continuity of the Julyphoto-
period experienced in nature by the nymphs. A light intensity of 500 foot-
candles was recorded on the surface of the shelf holding the battery jars.
The photoperiod was changed to that of September 6 after five days and
similar changes continued until the photoperiod was that of October 28,
Temperature was maintained in the chamber at 28. 9 C for 12 hours per
day and at 1. 5 C for the remaining 12 hours. The relative humidity was
maintained at 68 percent. The control battery jar s were cover ed secure-
ly with a light proof cover made of plastic which was black on the inside
and white on the outside. The crickets matured from July 3 0 to August
3 and eggs were laid mainly from August 10 to September 23, They were
collected every day and incubated at 29 C.
Results
As shown in fig. 4 only those eggs which were deposited by crickets
when under 12 hr 36 min or 9 hr 49 min photoperiod per day, showed a
high percentage hatch (45.9 and 43. 3 per cent, respectively) whereas
only 15,6 to 29.2 per cent of the rest of the eggs hatched. When these
results are compared with those of field adults laying eggs under the
same photoperiods, there is no similarity. Changing photoperiod has
no apparent relation to the incidence of diapause. Furthermore, the per-
centage hatch of eggs laid by the illuminated crickets (23.2) is signifi-
cantly higher at the 1 per cent level than that of eggs laid by the control
ones (12. 9). This could result from the absorption of radiant heat by the
illuminated crickets. In the control groups the difference in percentage
hatch of eggs deposited by females of different ages was not significant
evenat the 5 per cent level. This suggests that light is necessary to the
full expression of the tendency of middle-aged females to lay diapausing
eggs.
100
15
25
20
SEPT
10
60-
\
\
30
12 i1 io 9
DAILY PHOTOPERIOD IN HOURS
Fig. 4. The percentage of diapausing eggs laid on succeeding dates by
crickets kept in continuous darkness (above#— -•) and under decreasing
photoperiod (belowO 0)at 28. 9 C for 12 hours and 1. 5 C for remaining
12 hours per day. Incubation temperature 29 C.
Nymphal Development
There is no information concerning the number or duration of nym-
phal instars in N. fasciatus under field conditions or in the laboratory,
Nymphal development was studied in the laboratory to permit recognition
of stages collected from the field and allow experiments in which different
instars were given photoperiod treatments.
Methods and materials
Eggs were collected from females kept in the laboratory. They were
maintained at 5 C for 3 0 days to break diapause and then incubated at
29 C or 24 C. Nymphs emerging from eggs on any one day were divided
into groups of either ten or two which were kept separately in rearing
jars. Forty-five jars were kept at each of the incubation temperatures.
Twenty of these contained 10 nymphs each, and the remaining 25 two
nymphs each. The jars were covered with fine insect screening and the
crickets were individually observed for moulting by removing paper strips
and vials every 24 hours from the first instar to the adult stage. For
the first three nymphal instar s, the light colour of newly moulted nymphs,
body size, and width of the head capsule between the eyes were the cri-
teria used to determine new moultings. Exuviae were of little value as
they were usually consumed by the nymphs. Nymphs older than the fourth
instar were examined for the length of wing pads and ovipositor. Measure-
Sarai
117
merits were made with an ocular micrometer.
Results
There are six nymphal instars. The mean duration of the nymphal
instars and the mean width of the head capsule between the compound
eyes are set out in Table 2. The first three nymphal instars are almost
of the same duration at each of the two temperatures, whereas, the fourth,
fifth and sixth instar s differ considerably. There is a difference of about
0, 1 mm in the width of the head capsule between each of the first three
instars. Only injured and dying nymphs were attacked and eaten by
healthy ones. No differences were observed between the two sizes of
groups .
TABLE 2. The duration of nymphal instars of fasciatus in days and the
width of the head in mm. Means ± standard deviations.
From field observation and these experiments this species is uni-
voltine in Edmonton. Non-diapausing eggs cannot hatch the same year,
firstly because cumulative temperature is insufficient and secondly be-
cause the big differences between day and night temperatures induce
diapause.
Submergence in Water
It was observed previously that two to three days exposure to muddy
soil was not detrimental to eggs, while 51 days was. The effect of sub-
mergence of eggs in water in the laboratory was, therefore, studied.
Methods and materials
Eggs deposited on September 27 and 28 by females collected from
Atim Cr eekmeadow in 1964 were used. Four hundred and fifty eggs were
kept at 5 C from the end of October 1964 to July 5, 1965 when the fol-
lowing experiment was started. Five groups each of 75 eggs were treated
by submerging them under tap water in bottles for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25
days, A remaining group of 75 eggs was incubated in the normal manner
to serve as a control. Each bottle was provided with one inch of wet soil.
Eggs were placed a few millimeters below the surface of the soil. The
bottles were then filled with tap water gently without disturbing the eggs
and kept at 29 C. After treatment eggs were sieved out and incubated at
118
Diapause in Nemobius
29 C.
Results
Table 3 shows the percentage mortality and the minimum incubation
period after immersion. Development seems to continue at about its
normal rate at 29 C under water for eight to nine days and then cease.
There is a significant correlation at the one per cent probability level
between duration of submergence and percentage mortality. Submer-
gence of eggs in water is clearly detrimental after 5 days and about three-
quarters of the eggs in the field will be killed by 25 days of flooding.
Barber and Dicke (1939) have shown that pupae of Heliothis armigera Hubner
are killed by water; moreover, mortality increases with a rise of tem-
perature.
TABLE 3. The lethal effect of submergence in water for different periods
on eggs of N. fasciatus .
r (correlation coefficient) between period
of submergence and percentage mortality
5% probability level
1% probability level
p< 0. 01; p< 0.05)
0.
0. 88
0. 95
EFFECTS OF LOW TEMPERATURES IN THE LABORATORY
ON DIAPAUSE
While both temperature and photoperiod may invoke or terminate
diapause, Lees (1955, p. 53) stated that temperature is by far the most
important environmental agency controlling the termination of diapause.
There are many examples of insects from several orders in which dia-
pause is broken by exposure to low temperatures. It has been shown in
a number of species of Orthoptera (Parker 1930, Burdick 1937,
Andrewartha 1943, Church and Salt 1952, Browning 1952a, b, Hogan
1960a, b, Rakshpal 1962a, b, Masaki 1962) that exposure of diapausing
eggs to low temperatures for an optimum time leads to ready development
when they are incubated at an appropriately higher temperature.
The effects of continuous low temperatures for different periods and
of alternating low and high temperatures on diapausing and post-diapaus-
Sarai
119
ing eggs were investigated. In discus sing the results of these experiments
I have arbitrarily described hatching within three days of first hatch of
less than 30 per cent of eggs as indicating full diapause and above 80 per
cent as indicating no diapause. Hatching of between 3 0 and 80 per cent
within 3 days is described as partial breakage of diapause.
Effects of Low Temperature on Pre-diapause Eggs
Eggs laid in August and September undergo a longer period of high
temperatures before being chilled than those laid in October, It has
been shown in some orthopteran species (Parker 1930, Church and Salt
1952, Browning 1952a, b) that diapause is broken in eggs which are ex-
posed to low temperature before the diapause stage is reached. But until
recently the effect of low temperatures on eggs of different ages has
scarcely been explored, except for some work by Hogan (1960b) on Acheta
commodus Walk,, Rakshpal (1962b) on Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm. andMasaki
(1962) on the Emma field cricket, GrylMus mitratus (Burm. ).
An experiment was carried out primarily to determine the relation-
ship between low temperatures and the breaking of diapause in eggs of
various ages. It was also possible to see if low temperatures had any
detrimental effect on these eggs. Rakshpal (1962b) observed very high
mortality when one day old eggs of Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm, were ex-
posed to low temperature.
Methods and materials
About 80 crickets were collected from the field and kept in the lab-
oratory in four rearing jars. Fourteen hundred eggs laid within 24 hours
were collected on each of two successive days. Each group of fourteen
hundred eggs was divided into lots of 50, Two replicates each of 50 eggs
were moved after keeping at 22 C for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 16, and 21 days (referred toas the initial incubation period) to either
0 C or 5 C for 30 days. Thereafter these eggs were incubated at 29 C.
Zero days initial incubation meant that eggs which were laid within 24
hours were exposed directly to low temperatures, whereas one day initial
incubation meant that eggs laid within 24 hour s were kept at 22 C for one
further day, and so on.
Results
Table 4 shows higher mortality (33 per cent) of eggs which were
given zero days initial incubation and exposed to 0 C than of those which
were kept at 5 C (10 percent). Mortality was similar for the rest of the
eggs. Eggs incubated initially for zero to three days did not take up
water during their exposure to low temperatures, but did so eventually
during final incubation at 29 C within seven days. Only some eggs which
were given an initial incubation of four to six days completed water up-
take before being exposed to lowtemperatures. After a seven day initial
incubation period all eggs were fully swollen with water . Hatching of eggs
without initial incubation and for both low temperature treatments started
on the 13th day and continued up to the 18th day of incubation. Maximum
hatching occurred, however, on the 14th day of incubation. All the hat-
ching of eggs which were incubated initially for 2 to 11 days, occurred
120
Diapause in Nemobius
within a range of two to three days; for the longer initial incubation,
however, this range was extended to a period of six to seven days. The
period to maximum hatching decreased from 14 to 10 days as the initial
incubation increased from zero to seven days. It seems from this dif-
ference of four days in these incubation periods that eggs without low
temperature treatment developed at 22 C in seven days to the stage they
had reached at 29 C in four days. Thus the total incubation period at
29 C for all the post-diapausing eggs is almost always 13 to 15 days.
After more than seven days initial incubation maximum hatching took
place on the 10th day (sometimes on the 9th day) of final incubation. Eggs
which were incubated initially for 16 and 21 days showed a somewhat
lower total percentage hatch than those given 1 to 11 days initial incub-
ation. They also showed a wide range of hatching (six to seven days) and
hence a higher mean incubation period. This suggests that eggs which
were kept at 22 C for longer periods before chillingmight have under gone
diapausemore strongly than eggs which were exposed to low temperature
earlier. They, therefore, might require longer low temperature treat-
ment to break diapause. Analysis of variance showed that the variation
in per cent hatch among treatments is significant at the one per cent pro-
bability level due to the interaction of low temperatures and initial in-
cubation periods . Variationin percent hatch among treatments of initial
incubation periods, however, is significant only at the five per cent level.
Effects of Low Temperature on Diapausing Eggs
N. fasciatus is found in places where winter temperatures differ wide-
ly, it follows that this cricket possesses some mechanism by which dia-
pause is terminated by locally available low temperatures. Lees (1955)
found that diapause termination in insects from warmer localities does
not require such low temperatures as in insects inhabiting colder environ-
ments. Danilyevsky (1965) and Masaki (1961) consider that genetical
differentiation for terminating diapause by local low temperatures is
often involved in insects with a seasonal rhythm of development adapted
to different climatic areas. Bigelow (I960, 1962) reported variations
in adaptability to local low temperatures in local populations of field
crickets .
I was interested, therefore, in determining the range and periods of
low temperatures effective in breaking diapause.
Methods and materials
Eight hundred eggs, which had been laid over a 24 hour period during
September 1964 were divided into 16 groups of 50. All groups were in-
cubated initially at 22 C for 10 days to allow them to reach the diapause
stage, so that mortality would be lessened. Four groups each were then
kept at the following temperatures: 0 C, 5 C, IOC, and 15 C. After 15,
30, 45 and 60 days one group of eggs from each room was incubated at
29 c. The same procedure was repeated in 1965 under similar conditions.
Results
The percentage hatching in 11 days (the normal incubation period for
post-diapause eggs incubated previously for 10 days) is plotted against
Sarai
121
time of exposure to low temperatures in fig. 5. All four temperatures
broke diapause, but forty-five day exposures were needed before this
approached completeness. Frequency distributions of the percentage
hatching of eggs kept for 15, 30, 45, and 60 days at 5 C (fig. 6) show that
the range of hatching period decreases with increase in time of low tem-
perature treatment. It was found by analysis of variance that the highly
significant variation in hatching resulted from different durations of low
temperature treatment, whereas, variations due to different low tem-
peratures and due to the interaction of low temperatures with durations
are not significant.
TABLE 4. The effect of exposure to low temperature on mortality and
termination of diapause in eggs of N. fasciatus kept at 22 C for different
periods after being deposited. Incubation temperature was 29 C.
1
Some eggs hatched after very long periods.
*F' value for different initial incubation periods =
5% probability level =
1% probability level =
3. 13
2. 60
3. 96
'F’ value for interaction of low temperatures and
initial incubation periods
5% probability level
1% probability level
4^49,;o;c
2, 13
2. 93
122
Diapause in Nemobius
Fig. 5. The percentage hatch of diapause eggs of N. fasciatus after ex-
posure to different low temperatures for different periods, prior to
incubation at 29 C.
Effects of Low Temperature on Post-diapause Eggs
Post-diapause eggs under natural conditions sometimes experience
low temperatures during development in early summer. Rakshpal (1962b)
has shown that exposure of post-diapause eggs of Gryllus pennsylvanicus to
low temperature causes some mortality. The following experiment was
conducted primarily to determine whether low temperature causes any
mortality in post-diapause eggs, and secondly to determine how long it
takes for eggs which recover from this chilling to develop at incubation
temperature.
Methods and materials
Six hundred eggs were counted from eggs which had been deposited
within 24 hours. Two days later another similar sample of eggs was ob-
tained for replication. Each of these samples was divided into 12 groups
of 50. All the eggs were left at 22 C for 10 days and then transferred to
5 C for 3 0 days to terminate diapause, then brought to 29 C. Three groups
(from each replicate) were then incubated continuously at 29 C to serve
as controls, whereas, the other nine were moved to 5 C (second chilling)
three at a time, after 4, 6, and 8 days of incubation (referred to as first
post-diapause incubation). From each of these three groups one was
brought to 29 C for final incubation after 5, 10, and 15 days of second
chilling.
Sarai
123
Fig. 6. Frequency distribution of hatching of eggs of N- fasciatus exposed
to 5 C for 15, 30, 45, and 60 days and then incubated at 29 C.
Results
The percentage hatch at 29 C in all the treatments varied from 80 -
96. Hatch was greater in eggs which were given six days first post-dia-
pause incubation and five days second exposure to low temperature. The
control eggs started hatching on the ninth day of incubation and this was
largely complete by the 11th day (normal for eggs exposed to low tem-
perature after 10 days of pre-diapause incubation at 22 C), with maximum
hatching on the 10th day. Eggs which were incubated at 29 C for first
post-diapause incubation for 4, 6, and 8 days (regardless of duration of
second chilling) started hatching in their final incubation after 5, 3, and
1 days with maximum hatch on the 6th, 4th, and 2nd day, respectively.
124
Diapause in Nemobius
It is clear that all the groups of eggs have the same number of days of
total incubation period after the termination of diapause regardles s both
of the time at which they were exposed to low temperature for the second
time and of the duration of that exposure. Thus, once diapause is ter-
minated development follows a simple time-temperature pattern. Ex-
posure to low temperatures during development decreases the rate of
development only. It was also observed that after the second chilling
eggs recovered and resumed their normal development within 24 hours
at 29 C. Statistically there is no significant variation in percentage
hatch among all the treatments (including the control).
Effects of Alternating High and Low Temperatures
The objectives of this experiment were to determine whether the
diapause-inducing influence of widely fluctuating daily temperature ex-
perienced by the females as shown in the field, can be attributed to the
direct effect of these temperature fluctuations on the eggs.
Methods and materials
The high and low temperatures used in the experiment were 29 C
and 5 C, respectively. Five hundred eggs deposited on September 13
and 500 laid on September 16 were used. Each sample was divided into
five groups of 100 eggs. Four such groups from each replicate were
exposed to 2, 4, 8, and 12 day cycles of high and low temperatures over
a total period of 48 days. Each cycle was formed of two equal durations,
one at a low and the other at a high temperature. The two day cycle of
alternating high and low temperature treatment would mean one day at
high and one day at low temperature alternately for 48 days. The re-
maining fifth group of eggs was exposed continuously to low temperature
for 24 days to serve as a control. Twenty-four days was the time period
chosen because, for all the treatments the total number of days spent by
the eggs at low temperature was 24. After treatments eggs were incu-
bated continuously at 29 C.
Results
Table 5 shows that the per cent hatch at high temperature during the
treatments increased from 0 to 70 with the increase of 2 to 12 days in the
duration of cycle. Some hatching occurred during the treatments because
eggs remained at high temperature for a total of more than 15 days, the
normal period for incubation. Furthermore, eggs which were subjected
to two or four day cycles of high and low temperatures showed a very
low percentage hatch when incubated continuously at the completion of
treatments, that is, they were mostly in diapause. Cycles longer than
four days are not as effective in inducing diapause. An analysis of var-
iance revealed that variation in percentage hatch among different treat-
ments was highly significant.
Discussion
Diapause in N. fasdatus is broken by low temperature even in freshly
laid eggs. Lees (1955) mentioned that in many insects, particularly
those of Orthoptera, exposure to low temperature should synchronize
Sarai
125
with some definite stage in the morphological or physiological develop-
ment of the embryo to break diapause. He called this stage the period
of sensitivity. In N. fasciatus this period extends from zero to seven days
at 22 C. The stages of embryogenesis in this period are all the stages
up to the end of anatrepsis, which were observed by studying 40 eggs
after every 24 hours from a sample of 1, 000 kept at 22 C. It was found
from these observations that eggs developed readily without exposure to
low temperature up to the completion of anatrepsis (which comes mostly
after seven days of incubation at 22 C), after which development was
blocked in most of the eggs. Rakshpal (1962b) observed a similar period
of sensitivity in Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm.
TABLE 5. The mean percentage hatching of eggs of N. fasciatus during and
at the end of alternating 29 C and 5 C temperature treatments for 48 days.
‘F’ value for treatments = 62. 96’!'*!'
5% probability level = 9. 28
1% probability level = 29. 46
It has been noted by Parker (1930) in Melanoplus mexicanus (Sauss.),
Church and Salt (1952) in Melanoplus bivittatus {Sa.y) ^ and Browning (1952a,
b) in Acheta commodus Walk., that eggs which have not reached the diapause
stage but which were exposed to an adequate low temperature for an
adequate period and then incubated, hatched without diapause. Browning
(1952b) found that Acheta commodus is unusual in this respect, because in
most species undergoing diapause low temperature is most effective in
terminating diapause after the insects have entered diapause.
Hogan (1960a) criticized the observations of Browning from his own
experiments on Acheta commodus but confirmed them later (1960b) by stat-
ing that exposure of pre-diapause eggs to a temperature of about 13 C
so weakens the tendency of eggs to enter diapause that it is readily aver-
ted when they are transferred to a suitable incubation temperature (p,
528). In fact, in his experiments from which he criticized Browning a
suitable incubation temperature was not provided for the eggs after low
temperature treatment.
Only a small proportion of the pre-diapause eggs o£ Gryllus pennsylvanicus
Burm. were rendered free from diapause by low temperature (5 - 7 C)
and there was such a high mortality that the eggs which were incubated
for one day only at 22 - 23 C before exposure to low temperature were
126
Diapause in Nemobius
completely killed by the latter (Rakshpal 1962b).
The observation that eggs of N. fasciatus have presumably entered
diapause more strongly when kept for longer periods at high temperature
before low temperature treatment agrees to some extent with that of
Browning (1952a) in Acheta commodus Walk, He has shown that a preliminary
high temperature treatment for more than two days caused the eggs of
Acheta commodus Walk, to enter diapause more firmly than if kept for a
little or no time at high temperature before low temperature treatment.
He believed that diapause in eggs given a lengthy initial incubation at
high temperatures was more intense and so required a longer period for
its breaking. Moroga (1951, cited in Lees 1955) has also observed in
Bombyx mori L. that if eggs were given an initial incubation period ranging
from 3 to 80 days, before 40 days of chilling at 5 C, the percentage of
non- diapau sing eggs dropped from 84 to 8.
Masaki (1962) exposed eggs of the Emma field cricket, Gryllulus mitratus
(Burm, ) to a high temperature (30 C) for different periods and then kept
them at a low temperature (20 C) to determine the effect of duration of
high temperature on diapause intensity. He found that eggs were most
responsive to the diapause -intensifying action by 9 or 14 day high tem-
perature treatment when they were in the late pre-diapause and early
diapause stages. His findings, however, were based on the mean incu-
bation period at 20 C after high temperature treatment. These mean
incubation periods ranged from 108,5 to 132.4 days, which shows that
these eggs were still diapausing.
Alternating low and high temperatures apparently cause eggs of
N. fasciatus to undergo diapause and this effect increases as the duration
of the cycle length decreases to 48 hours. This characteristic could be
of high survival value by enabling the eggs laid in the late summer to
undergo diapause because of low night temperatures and high day tem-
peratures. This diapause is eventually broken by the continuous cold of
winter. Rakshpal (1962a) has shown that changing high and low temper-
atures for 56 days, in eggs of Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm, has the same
effect on breaking diapause as 60 days continuous 6 to 7 C exposure. In
other words, 52 days low temperature treatment (the total number of
days for which eggs remained at low temperature during the treatment)
in changing high and low temperatures have the same effect as 60 days
continuous chilling.
In N. fasciatus the total number of incubation days at high temperature
required in post-diapause eggs remains the same regardless of the time
when these eggs were subjected to low temperature again during their
incubationand the duration of that period of chilling. Thus post-diapause
eggs in early summer continue to develop whenever temperatures are
favourable. Low temperatures retard or prevent development and eggs
resume their normal development shortly after the termination of low
temperature periods. Rakshpal (1962b) has shown somewhat similar
results in Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm, but post-diapause eggs of this species
took three days to recover from the second chilling.
Sarai
127
COMBINED EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND
PHOTOPERIOD ON DIAPAUSE
There are few papers on the effects of photoperiod on diapause in
the Orthoptera. Masaki (1963) studied the effect of photoperiod on the
development of Nemobius yezoensis Shiraki, a univoltine Japanese cricket
overwintering as late instar nymphs. He found that nymphal diapause is
terminated by long photoperiod (16 hours per day), but is maintained for
a long time by a short one (12 hours). Other important work is that of
Norris (1959, 1965) on the red locust, Nomadacris septemfasdata (Serv, ),
Woodrow (1964) on Melanoplus devastator Scudder, and Halliburton and
Alexander (1964) on Chortophaga viridifasdata (DeGeer),
This study was undertaken with the hope of determining whether the
univoltine life history of N. fasdatus at Edmonton is due to a short summer
or is regulated by photoperiod causing the production of diapausing eggs.
Experiments were conducted to study the effect of photoperiod on the
breaking of diapause in eggs during low temperature treatment, and on
the various post-embryonic stages by recording the incidence of diapause
in the eggs laid by them. The criteria for diapausing and non-diapausing
eggs are the same as in the previous sections.
Influence of PhotoperiocS on Diapause during Chilling
Gayspitz (1953, cited in Danilyevsky 1965) found that diapause in the
larvae of the pine moth, Dendrolimus pini L. (Lepidoptera; Lasiocampidae)
under conditions of 12 hours daily light and a temperature of 20 C lasts
about a month, whereas at the same temperature with continuous illum-
ination activity begins after 17 days. Danilyevsky (1965) also mentioned
a similar but stronger effect of photoperiod on the diapausing larvae of
Arctia caia L. and Parasemia plantaginis L. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae).
N. fasdatus deposits eggs in the soil at a depth ranging from three to
sevenmillimeters which could bean adaptation counteracting a diapause
inhibiting effect of light.
Preliminary experiment
Five hundred eggs laid within 24 hours in September 1964 were
divided into five groups of 100. Another sample of 500 eggs was used
in 1965 for replication. All these eggs were left at 22 C in the dark for
10 days to allow them to reach the diapause stage. Thereafter one group
from each sample was kept under 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours daily light at
5 C in light-proof compartments for 30 days. The fifth group was kept
in total darkness to serve as a control. The light was provided by a 16
inch 15 w fluorescent "cool white" lamp operated by a time switch. The
light intensity was 85 - 90 foot-candles on the shelf holding the petri
dishes containing the eggs. All the eggs were incubated at 29 C after
treatment.
Results - The eggs in all the treatments were virtually free from
diapause. Although the difference in percentage hatch among the treat-
ments was not significant, eight hours daily photoperiod showed slightly
greater hatch (93 per cent) than the rest of the photoperiods (average
128
Diapause in Nemobius
87, 5 per cent). Thus it appears that low temperature alone is sufficient
to break diapause in this species.
The Effect of Incubation Temperatures
It was mentioned previously that the percentage hatch of eggs of
N. fasciatus is greater at higher incubation temperatures than at lower
ones, when they are incubated without any low temperature treatment to
break diapause. Moreover, eggs remain at low temperatures for six
months at Edmonton. The effect of very long exposure of these eggs to
low temperatures and their incubation at various temperatures to deter-
mine the degree to which diapause is terminated was therefore studied.
Secondly, as pointed out in the results of the previous experiment, the
effect of eight hours daily photoperiod during chilling needed further
clarification. This experiment was designed to determine the effects of
the above mentioned factors and their interactions.
Methods and materials _ In this experiment two replicates each of 2,475
eggs were used. For this purpose, 300 crickets were collected on Sep-
tember 10, 1964 and kept in 10 battery jars in the laboratory. Eggs for
one replicate were collected from those deposited on September 11,
These eggs were divided into 75 groups of 33. They were kept in the
dark at 22 C for 10 days and thereafter moved to 5 C. At this temperature
15 such groups were subjected to each of 0, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours
daily light. Three groups were removed each time from every sample
of 15 groups after 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 days. One group from each of
these three was incubated at 29 C, 24 C, and 20 C. This experiment was
repeated on the same dates in 1965 and under the same conditions to re-
plicate for analysis of variance. Unfortunately the temperature in the
cabinet set for 20 C started fluctuating so widely when the experiment
was already in progress during both years that the data for 20 C had to
be excluded from the statistical analysis. An analysis of variance for a
split plot design was used because eggs were subjected to different in-
cubation temperatures in different cabinets.
Those eggs which hatched within 16 days of incubation at 24 C were
taken as non-diapausing since 14 to 16 days is the average incubation
period at 24 C for post-diapause eggs which have been subjected to low
temperature after 10 days of an initial incubation at 22 C temperature.
Results - Table 6 shows that the per cent hatch for different photo-
periods at each of the two incubation temperatures for the same durations
of chilling are not significantly differ ent. Secondly, hatch increases with
the increase in duration of low temperature treatment at both the incu-
bation temperatures. At 29 C however, there is rapid increase in per-
centage hatch up to 24 days of chilling when eggs are virtually free of
diapause. For chilling durations longer than 24 days the percentage hatch
at this temperature does notvary much. On the other hand incubation at
24 C shows very little breaking of diapause by treatments up to 24 days
at low temperature. Diapause is terminated at an incubation temperature
of 24 C to a great extent when eggs had been chilled-for 48 days. Ninety-
six days chilling enabled almost all the eggs to develop readily at this
Sarai
129
temperature. This means that the lower the incubation temperature the
longer the low temperature treatment required to allow the eggs to develop
readily.
TABLE 6. The mean percentage hatch of eggs after exposure to different
photoperiods at 5 C for different periods and then incubated at 24 or 29 C.
The observations from the previous experiment that photoperiod
during chilling does not affect termination of diapause are confirmed from
this experiment, because statistically there is no significant difference
among hatching of eggs given different photoperiods . The only significant
variations in hatching among the different treatments are those which are
due to different durations at low temperature, and due to different in-
cubation temperatures. Both these variations are highly significant. It
was found that development in eggs proceeded normallyat 20 ± 3 C when
chilled for 96 days. It is possible, therefore, that eggs after such a long
chilling are capable of developing promptly at lower incubation temper-
atures. This confirms that no influence of photoperiod on diapause or
development can beshownand that eggs are rendered free from diapause
by low temperature alone. Secondly, eggs need longer exposure to low
temperature for termination of diapause if they are to develop subsequen-
tly at lower incubation temperatures.
The Influence of Light on Nymphs
There is much evidence showing the influence of photoperiod oncer-
tain stages in the life history of different insects affecting diapause either
in the succeeding stages or in the next generation. Dickson (1949) ob-
served in GraphoUtka molesta (Busck. ) in southern California that a substan-
tial proportion of the larvae entered diapause in the early autumn when
temperatures were still favourable for development. He found thatdia-
130
Diapause in Nemobius
pause in these larvae had already been determined by the photoperiod
experienced during the early larval instars.
Danilyevsky (1948, cited in Danilyevsky 1965) found that if Acronycta
ruwicis L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is exposed during the larval feeding
period to a short day-length (6 - 15 hours) virtually every individual en-
ters diapause in the pupal stage, whereas the incidence of diapause fell
to zero when the larvae experienced 17 hours daily photoperiod.
Kogure (1933) showed in Bombyxmori L. that light and temperature
acting on eggs and early larval instars induced a particular pattern of
diapause which appearedin the eggs laid by the adults arising from these
stages.
In all of the previous experiments on the influence of photoperiod on
diapause in A^. fasciatus only the egg and adult stages were considered. An
experiment was planned to determine whether photoperiod acting on the
nymphs has any effect on the proportion of diapausing eggs deposited by
the females arising from these nymphs.
Methods and materials
Newly hatched nymphs for this experiment came from eggs which
were deposited in September 1965 held after diapause at 24 C. They
were divided into 85 groups of ten, within 24 hours after hatching. Each
group was raised to maturity on rabbit pellets in a rearing jar. Five
such jars were exposed to 12 hours or 16 hours daily light in two growth
chambers for each of the nymphal instars and the adult stage. The light
intensity on the surface holding the jar s was approximately 500 foot-can-
dles and the temperature was kept at 24 C. Since the mean durations of
the six instars at 24 C are 5. 8, 5. 6, 4. 7, 6. 3, 8. 1 and 9. 8 days, res-
pectively, the first instar was exposed for six days only, the second for
six days only and so on to either 12 or 16 hours daily light. Five jars
were subjected to each of 0, 12, and 16 hours daily light for all the post
embryonic stages, to serve as controls. All the jar s were observed once
a week to change the water vial, jars on a dark regime under a 40 watt
red light. High mortality during handling resulted from this technique.
After reaching the adult stage all the five samples of each treatment
were transferred to a battery jar for convenience in getting eggs. For
oviposition wet soil was provided in petri dishes in the usual manner on
every alternate day and sometimes after every fourth day to minimize
the exposure of adults to red light. Eggs thus obtained were sieved in
water and incubated directly at 29 C.
Results
Table 7 shows the sex ratio in each treatment and the percentage
hatch of the eggs at 29 C laid by the adults resulting from each treat-
ment. It is apparent that neither of the photoperiods influences the laying
of diapausing eggs since the percentage hatch of the eggs laid by the con-
trol crickets reared in darkness throughout the post-embryonic part of
the life history is not much different from the other treatments. Only a
small proportion of the 50 nymphs in each treatment reached maturity,
which decreased the precision of the results.
Sarai
131
TABLE 7. The influence of photoperiod on different post-embryonic
stages expressed as the percentage hatching of eggs laid by the resulting
females. Incubation temperature was 29 C.
Control crickets reared in total darkness yielded 7 males and 5 females
and 25% of their eggs hatched.
Discussion
Marcovitch (1923, cited in Danilyevsky 1965) working with aphids
was probably the first to discover the effect of photoperiod on the life
cycle of an insect. It is only during the last few years that the subject
of photoperiodism has attracted close attention. In most of the insects
worked on so far , diapause has been found to be influenced by photoperiod.
But Danilyevsky and Gayspitz (1948, cited in Lees 1955) found that dia-
pause in P/ja/era 6ucep/ia/a (L, ) and Spilosoma menthastri Esp, (Lepidoptera) was
unaffected by photoperiod. Dickson (1949) also observed no effect of
photoperiod on adult diapause in Listroderes obliquus Klug. (Coleoptera) when
larvae were grown under conditions of 9, 15, and 24 hours daily light.
He also found Lucilia sericata Meig. (Diptera) independent of photoperiod for
its diapause. Egg diapause in N. fasciatus also is unaffected by photoperiod
in any stage.
Browning (1952b) observed that inalso Acheta commodus Walk, that the
incubation temperature influenced the termination of diapause after low
temperature treatment. Exposure for 30 days to 10,3 C gave 84 per
cent hatch at 29. 9 C, whereas following the same low temperature treat-
ment only 64 per cent hatched at 26. 5 C and none at 20. 9 C,
The observation that N. fasciatus is neutral to photoperiod, however,
should not be taken as valid for this species in general, because only the
Edmonton strain is involved. For the generalization of these observa-
tions, experiments with strains from other parts of its range will be
required.
132
Diapause in Nemobius
GENERAL DISCUSSION
N. fasciatus, like many other Orthoptera, undergoes diapause at the
close of anatrepsis. Wide variations were observed in the proportion
of diapausing eggs among eggs laid during succeeding summer weeks in
association with wide fluctuations in the daily range of temperature. The
diapause-inducing effect of alternating high and low temperatures on the
eggs in the laboratory suggests that this association is causal, and that
the eggs during thepre-and post- oviposition period are affected directly
by external temperatures. To resume development diapause eggs of
N. fasciatus require to be subjected to temperatures below IOC for periods
up to 96 days followed by temperatures above 20 C. The induction of
diapause by fluctuating temperatures enables most eggs to enter diapause
by the end of summer. Untimely hatching of eggs in the same summer
is thus greatly reduced, an adaptation of high survival value. Lees (1955,
p. 29) states that as a general rule high temperatures tend to avert dia-
pause while low temperatures favour arrest of development. This holds
good in N. fasciatus in which a high percentage hatch would not normally
occur in the latitude of Edmonton because temperatures in late summer
rarely rise above 25 C. None of these processes show evidence of being
affected by photoperiod or changes in photoperiod.
A second probable factor contributing to variations in the proportion
of diapausing eggs, is the age of the adult female at the time of ovi-
position. It has been observed in Bombyx mori L. (Kogure 1933), p/j/e6ofomus
papatasii Scop. (R oubaud 1935), Locustana pardalina Walk. (Matthee 1951),
Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm. (Rakshpal 1962a) that the physiological condition
of the female at the time of oviposition affects the presence or absence
of diapause in the next generation. The incidence of diapause in the eggs
seems to follow a normal curve of frequency distribution through adult
life, but this is partially suppressed when the insects are kept in con-
tinuous darkness.
The only difference observed between diapausing and post-diapausing
eggs of N. fasciatus was that the latter were clearer in their consistency.
It is a general belief that during diapause some physiological changes
occur which ultimately result in the resumption of active development.
The difference in the consistency of diapausing and non-diapausing eggs
in N. fasciatus is probably due to some such physiological changes in the
egg during low temperature treatment. Zolotarev (1947 and 1950, cited
in Danilyevsky 1965) calls these changes the diapause processes.
Andrewartha (1952) introduced the term "diapause development" for the
same thing. His term has since been used by other authors (Browning
1952a, b, Lees 1955, Masaki 1962, Beck and Alexander 1964a, b).
Danilyevsky prefers the term "reactivation" for the same phenomenon,
becausehe thinks that the term development is commonly linked with pro-
gressive growth and differentiation. Probably in these physiological
changes different processes are involved in different insects (Harvey
1962).
It seems that N. fasciatus does not need an adaptive mechanism such
as a very intense obligatory diapause or diapause decided by the photo-
period to survive in this part of the world. Diapause is facultative, be-
Sarai
133
cause a certain percentage of the eggs always hatch providing the in-
cubation temperature is above 26 C. Changes in temperature are the
main influence determining the presence or absence of diapause in the
eggs. Under natural conditions, however, univoltinism is maintained,
firstly mainly by the induction of diapause through alternations of quite
low temperatures at nights with fairly high temperatures during days
for most of the oviposition period, and secondly by temperatures in Sep-
tember and October too low for the completion of development before
winter. Thus even those eggs which need only a short period of low tem-
perature for breaking diapause do not develop until June and July of the
following summer when temperatures are high enough for a long enough
time to complete development. By that time diapause will be broken in
all the eggs. There is, therefore, almost synchronous hatching in the
first half of July in nature.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 wish to thank most sincerely Dr. W. G. Evans, my supervisor, for
his many valuable suggestions and for his readiness to discuss any prob-
lem arising during the course of this study; Dr. G. E. Ball for his help
in many ways, 1 wish to thank Dr. D. A. Boag, member of my commit-
tee, for many useful suggestions.
1 am also grateful to Miss J.G. Shore, and Miss A, Zalums for their
cooperation and help, and Mr. H. Welling, supervisor of greenhouses,
for providing space in the low temperature rooms.
I wish also to express my gratitude to Dr. B. Hocking forgiving me
the opportunity to work in Canada and to the University of Alberta for an
intersession bursary during the summer of 1965, enabling this work to
be carried on without interruption.
REFERENCES
Alexander, R.D. and E.S. Thomas. 1959. Systematic and behavioral
studies on the crickets of the Nemobius fasciatus group (Orthoptera:
Gryllidae: Nemobiinae). Ann, ent. Soc. Amer. 52(5) : 591-605,
Andrewartha, H. G, 1943, Diapause in the eggs of Austroicetes cruciata
Sauss. (Acrididae), with particular reference to the influence of
temperature on the elimination of diapause. Bull. ent. Res. 34 :
1-17.
Andrewartha, H. G. 1952, Diapause in relation to ecology of insects.
Biol. Rev. 27 : 50-107.
Andrewartha, H. G. and L. C. Birch. 1954, The distribution and abun-
dance of animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago,
Illinois. XV + 782 pp.
Ball, E.D.,E.R. Tinkham, R. Flock and C. T. Vorhies. 1942. Grass-
hoppers and other Orthoptera. Tech. Bull. Ariz, agric. Exp. Stn
93 : 366 pp.
Barber, G. W. and F.F. Dicke. 1939. Effects of temperature and mois-
134
Diapause in Nemobius
ture on overwintering pupae of the corn earworm in the north-eas-
tern states. J. agric. Res. 59 : 711-723,
Beck, S.D. and N. Alexander. 1964a. Chemically and photoperiodically
induced diapause-development in the European corn borer, Ostrinia
nubilalis, Biol, Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 126 : 174-184.
Beck, S.D. and N. Alexander, 1964b. Protodone, an insect develop-
mental hormone. Biol. Bull, mar, Biol. Lab., Woods Hole 126:
185-198.
Bigelow, R. S. I960, Developmental rates and diapause in Acheta
pennsylvanicus and Acheta veletis , Can. J. Zool. 38 : 973-988,
Bigelow, R.S, 1962. Factor s affecting developmental rates and diapause
in field crickets. Evolution 16 : 396-406,
Blatchley, W, S. 1920. Orthoptera of north-eastern America. The
Nature Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Indiana. 784 pp.
Browning, T.O, 1952a. The influence of temperature on completion of
diapause in the eggs of Gryllulus commodus Walk, (Orthoptera). Aust.
J. scient. Res. Melbourne (B) 5 : 112-127.
Browning, T.O, 1952b, On the rate of completion of diapause develop-
ment at constant temperatures in the eggs of Gryllulus commodus Walk,
(Orthoptera). Aust, J. scient. Res. Melbourne (B) 5 : 344-353,
Burdick, H. C, 1937. The effect of exposure to low temperature on the
developmental time of the embryos of the grasshopper, Melanoplus
differentialis (Orthoptera). Physiol, Zool, 10 : 156-17 0,
Church, N.S. and R. W. Salt. 1952, Some effect of temperature on
development and diapause in eggs of Melanoplus bivittatus , Can. J. Zool,
30 : 173-184.
Corbet, P.S. 1956. Environmental factor s influencing the induction and
termination of diapause in the emperor dragonfly, Anax imperator
(Odonata: Aeshnidae). J. exp, Biol, 33 : 1-14.
Cousin, G. 1932, Etude experimentale de la diapause des insectes.
Bull, biol, Fr. Belg. , Paris Suppl. 15 : 1-341,
Cragg, J. B. and P. Cole. 1952. Diapause in Lucilia sericata , J. exp,
Biol. 29 : 600-604.
Danilevskii (= Danilyevsky), A, S, 1965, Photoperiodism and seasonal
development of insects. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London,
ix + 283 pp,
Dickson, R, C. 1949. Factors governing the induction of diapause in the
oriental fruit moth, Ann. ent. Soc, Amer, 42 : 511-537.
Fulton, B. B, 1931. A study of the genus Nemobius (Orthoptera : Gryllidae),
Ann. ent. Soc. Amer, 24(2) : 205-237,
Ghouri, A, S. K. and J. E. McFarlane. 1958. Observations on the dev-
elopment of crickets. Can. Ent, 90 : 158-165,
Halliburton, W. H. and G. Alexander. 1964. Effect of photoperiod on
molting of Chortophaga viridilasciata (DeGeer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae),
Ent. News 75 : 133-137.
Harvey, W. R . 1962. Metabolic aspects of insect diapause. A. Rev,
Ent. 7 : 57-80.
Hebard, Morgan. 1930. Orthoptera of Alberta, Proc. Acad, nat, Sci,
Philad. 82 : 377-403.
Hebard, Morgan, 1936. Orthoptera of North Dakota. N. Dak. agric.
Sarai
135
Exp, SubstnRep, 284.
Hogan, T. W. 1959. A rapid method of examining diapause of eggs of
embryos of 4cfteia commoc/us Nature, Lond. 138 : 269.
Hogan, T. W. 1960a. The onset and duration of diapause in eggs of
Acheta commodus Walk. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 13 : 527-540.
Kogure, M. 1933. The infleunce of light and temperature on certain
characters of silkworm, Bombyx mori , J. Dep, Agric. Kyushu imp.
Univ. 4 : 1-93.
Kozhanchikov, I.V. 1949. The amplitude of the daily temperature fluc-
tuation as a factor in larval development of the Chinese oak silkworm
( Antheraea pernyi Guer.), C.R. Acad, Sci, USSR, Moscow (N. S. ) 67 :
381-384.
Lees, A.D. 1955, The physiology of diapause in arthropods. Cam-
bridge Univ, Press, Cambridge. x+ 151 pp.
Lugger, O. 1897, Grasshoppers, locusts, crickets, cockroaches, etc.
of Minnesota. Bull. Minn, agric. Exp. Stn 55,
Masaki, S, 1962. The influence of temperature on the intensity of dia-
pause in the eggs of the Emma field cricket (Orthoptera; Gryllidae),
Oyo Kontyu 30(1) : 9-16.
Masaki, S. 1963. Photoperiodic control of growth and wing-form in
Nemobius yezoensis Shiraki (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), Oyo Kontyu 31(1):
16-26.
Matthee, J. J. 1951. The structure and physiology of the egg of Locustana
pardalina (Walk.), Sci. Bull, Dep, Agric. For, Un. S. Afr, 316: 1-
83.
Norris, M. J. 1959. The influence of day length on imaginal diapause
in the red locust, Nomadacris septemfasciata (Serv, ). Entomologia exp,
appl. 2 : 154-168.
Norris, M. J. 1965. The influence of constant and changing photoperiods
on imaginal diapause in the red locust, Nomadacris septemfasciata (Serv.).
J. Insect Physiol. 11 : 1105-1119.
Parker, J. R, 1930. Some effects of temperature and moisture upon
Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus Sauss. and Camnula pellucida Scudder (Or-
thoptera), Bull, Mont, agric. Exp. Stn 223, 132 pp.
Rakshpal, R. 1962a. Diapause in the eggs of Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm,
(Orthoptera). Gan, J. Zool. 40 : 179-194.
Rakshpal, R. 1962b, Effect of cold on pre- and post-diapause eggs of
Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burm, Proc. R. ent, Soc, Lond. (A) 37 : 117-120.
Readio, P. A, 1931, Dormancy in Reduvius personatus L, Ann, ent. Soc.
Amer. 24 : 19-39.
Roubaud, E. 1935. Vie latente et condition hibernale provoquees par
les influences maternalles chez certains invertebres. Ann. sci,
nat. 18 : 39-51.
Strohecker, H.F. 1937, An ecological study of some Orthoptera of the
Chicago area. Ecology 18 : 231-250.
Vickery, V.R. 1963, The occurrence of Nemobius fasciatus (DeGeer) in
Newfoundland (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae). Can. Ent. 95 :
17.
Woodrow, W. M. 1964. Effects of photoperiod upon oogenesis in
Melanoplus devastator Scudder. J. Kansas ent. Soc. 37 : 163-168,
136
Book Review
SOUTHWOOD, T.R.E. 1966. Ecological methods, xviii + 391 pp. Methuen, Lon-
don. Price - 75 shillings.
Southwood, in his preface, points out the distinction between 'methods for ecol-
ogists' and 'ecological methods ' , which are "those concerning ... the measurement,
description and analysis of both the population and the community". This means
that measurement of environmental factors is not covered by this book, but this is
well documented in other compilations. "Emphasis is placed on those (methods) most
relevant to work on insects and other non-micr oscopic invertebrates of terrestrial
and aquatic environments, but it is believed that the principle s and general techniques
will be found of value in studies on vertebrates and marine animals".
The section on 'Materials and Methods' in a biological paper can often be the
most important part of the paper, not only because conclusions so obviously depend
on methods, but also it is here that the way to solve some other problem may be
found. (Editors who shy away from purely methodological papers or who demand
cuts from this section might take note.) This widely scatter ed literature has not be-
fore been brought together into one place and this is hardly surprising in view of the
magnitude of the problem. Dr. Southwood has, however, succeeded in doing this
with, as the book is subtitled, particular reference to insect populations. The work
of 1400 authors has been examined and this presumably means even more individual
papers, complete citations for which are given at the end of each chapter.
After 5 pages of introduction, there are chapters on: the sampling programme
and the measurement and description of dispersion (51 pages); absolute population
estimates using marking techniques (42 pages); absolute population estimates by
sampling air, plants, plant products and vertebrate hosts (34 pages); absolute esti-
mates by sampling soil and litter (25 pages); absolute estimates by sampling fresh-
water habitats (16 pages); relative methods of population measurement (55 pages);
estimates based on products and effects of insects (11 pages); methods for the es-
timation of natality, mortality, and dispersal (37 pages); the construction, descrip-
tion and analysis of age-specific life-tables (34 pages); age-grouping of insects and
time-specific life-tables (11 pages); experimental component analysis (4 pages); the
measurement of associationbetween species and the description of a fauna (28 pages) ;
the estimation of productivity and the construction of an energy budget (19 pages).
There are 101 clear figures and 24 tables showing equipment and explaining processes
of analysis. In many instances, the whole process from collection of data through
final mathematical analysis is given, making it unneces sar y to go to the original
literature.
It is very difficult to find fault with this book. It will be essential to anyone in
anyway involved in research on insect populations, particularly during the planning
of a new project. Economic entomology must benefit. Teachers of ecology, too,
will find the book extremely useful. The author expresses the hope that more pre-
cise studies and more critical analyses will be attempted as a result of this book.
If this should happen then ecology will advance and the ecological armchair may be-
come a more comfortable place to inhabit.
Gordon Pritchard
Department of Entomology
University of Alberta
Quaestiones
entomologicae
A periodical record of entomological investigations,
published ot the Department of Entomology, Uni-
versity of Alberta, Edmonton, Conada.
VOLUME III
NUMBERS
JULY 1967
QUAESTIONES ENTOMOLOGICAE
A periodical record of entomological investigations, published at
the Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Volume 3 Number 3 31 July 1967
CONTENTS
Guest editorial
Madge - A revision of the Genus Lebia Latreille in America north
of Mexico (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
Book review
137
. 139
^43
Guest Editorial - Fascinating Taxonomy
It is often stated that insects form at least 75% of the kinds of
animals. It is less often noted that this class is one of the most diverse
in the animal kingdom, with several of its 30-or-so orders being some-
times thought of as more diverse than the entire phylum Vertebrata.
From the taxonomic viewpoint, it is seldom remarked that while the
vertebrates are in a highly classified state, with problems of taxonomy
and nomenclature in the background, insects are at the stage where there
is great taxonomic activity, much monographic work, and innumerable
problems of nomenclature of all possible kinds.
These conditions justify no one in thinking that the insects are
more important zoologically than the vertebrates, but they do make it
obvious that the study of insect taxonomy today is likely to be much more
complex than the current sort of work on vertebrate taxonomy. To many
of us, this means more varied and more interesting.
A recent very extensive bibliography of mammals (Walker 1964)
shows among the thousands of items only a very few monographs , virtually
no major catalogs (except of type specimens), and few substantial faunal
studies in the last thirty or forty years. There are a tremendous num-
ber of studies of single species, usually of some particular aspect of
that species or its name. In fact, all the aspects of taxonomy together
are virtually buried under an avalanche of more practical studies, oc-
casioned by man's direct interest in these large animals as game, in
zoos, and under conservation. This is the natural result of the fact that
the species taxonomy reached a high state nearly a hundred years ago,
with many monographic and faunal treatments at that time.
Although the formal taxonomic study of insects began at the same
time as that of mammals, it progressed much more slowly, probably
mostly because of the vastly larger number of kinds and the much greater
difficulty in accumulating the necessary specimens . Large faunal studies
are still being produced, as witness the Insects of Hawaii by E. C.
Zimmerman, Monographs of tribes, families, and even orders are not
uncommon in today's literature, even with the problems of obtaining
publication, and generic reviews are legion.
138
In this situation, insect taxonomists are encountering all the pos-
sible problems of taxonomy, including many never faced by some of the
vertebrate taxonomists. These latter may be the result of availability
of thousands of specimens of some species; or of genera including hun-
dreds or even thousands of species; or of the organisms being too small
in size to be studied without special techniques; or especially of the two-
hundred-year history of the names, over which span a variety of inter-
pretations have been made and superseded, often by a larger number of
reviewers .
In addition to all this, one major factor alone contrasts the pre-
sent-day taxonomy of insects with that of mammals. This is the exis-
tence of many still undescribed species and genera of insects. Although
there have recently been predictions that new species will soon taper
off, there is as yet no clear indication of this, and the undescribed species
now to be found inmuseums will keep taxonomists busy for years even if
collecting turns up no more new ones.
Monographs, catalogs, and faunal studies never were so much
needed in mammalogy as in entomology, simply because a mammalogist
can be reasonably competent over the entire range of three to four thou-
sand species. Many insect families contain more species than this, re-
quiring a much higher degree of taxonomic specialization. And further-
more, it is probably much more difficult to distinguish 1000 species of
one genus than 4000 species that are clearly distributed among a thousand
genera.
For these reasons the taxonomy of insects is today far more di-
verse than that of mammals; probably far more demanding in discern-
ment and discrimination; still wide open for major contributions of a
variety of sorts; much more generally adaptable to statistical analysis
of the variation of its species; less affected by the practical interests of
man; and for all these reasons more fascinating.
R.E. Blackwelder
Department of Zoology
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, Illinois
Madge
139
A REVISION OF THE GENUS LEBIA LATREILLE IN AMERICA NORTH OF
MEXICO (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE)
RONALD BRADLEY MADGE
British Museum (Natural History)
S. Kensington, London S.W. 7
Quaestiones Entomologicae
3: 139-242 1967
Within the genus Lebia in America north of Mexico four subgenera and 47 species are
recognized as valid. The genus is defined in a broad sense to include several New World groups
recognized as distinct genera by some workers. This concept of Lebia is supported with mor-
phological and limited biological evidence. It is also shown that in this sense Lebia encompasses
many exotic groups recognized as distinct genera at the present time.
A key to the sub genera and species is given. Each subgenus and species is described and
synonyms are listed. The distribution of each species is presented by locality records and for
those species with extensive ranges distribution maps are given. Structures important in identifi-
cation, especially the endophallic armature of the male genitalia, are illustrated.
The subgenus Loxopeza includes eight species of which three, deceptrix, subdola, and
subgrandis, are described as new. Five names are reduced to synonymy.
The sz/bgenws Polycheloma is described as new. The name of its single species, lecontei,
is a replacement for an invalid homonym.
The subgenus Lebia includes 37 species of which four, nigricapitata, abdita, insulata,
and perpallida are described as new. Forty-nine species group names are relegated to synonymy.
Phylogenetic relationships are postulated for these subgenera and species.
The genus Lebia is a group of ground beetles almost world wide in
distribution, comprising several hundred species. The species are
usually colorful and range from about 2. 5 to 14 mm in length. Although
the majority of species occur in the tropical regions a large number occur
in temperate areas. Very few extend into the far north. The adults are
predaceous and the larvae, as far as is known, are parasitoids on the
immature stages of chrysomelid beetles. However, even though they
may be beneficial, nothing is known about the biology of the vast majority
of the species.
This study deals with the taxonomy of the adults of Lebia occur-
ring in America north of Mexico. The concept of this group of species
as constituting a single genus is upheld, thus agreeing with most North
American students of Lebia but opposing the view of many worker s in other
parts of the world. The various populations of North American Lebia are
reevaluated in the light of the currently accepted concept of species as
outlined by Simpson (1961). Forty-seven species are recognized, seven
of which are described as new. This compares with 94 species listed
from the area under study by Csiki (1932) in Coleopterorum Catalogus.
These 47 species are arranged in four subgenera, one of which is new.
A phylogeny of the species within these subgenera is presented.
140
Revision of Lebia
HISTORICAL SUMMARY
The concept of the genus Lebia has undergone considerable modi-
fication since its description by Latreille in 1802. Although segregates
from Lebia were recognized at an early date ( Lamprias Bonelli 1809,
Echimuthus Leach 1815 (= Lamprias ) these were almost completely ignored
in the nomenclature of North American Lebia, A few American Lebia were
placed by Motschoulsky under the generic names Lamprias and Lia. It was
not until Chaudoir (1870-71) produced his Monographie des Lebiidesthat
the classification of our species was seriously changed. Of the many
genera into which Le6/a was split by Chaudoir, four [Lebia Latreille,
Loxopeza Chaudoir, Aphelogenia Chaudoir and Dianchomena Chaudoir) were re-
cognized as occurring in America north of Mexico. Later, Lamprias , as
understood by Chaudoir, was added to this list when Horn (1882) recog-
nized-Lebia divisa cis a member of that group. Previously Chaudoir (1870-
71) and Horn (1872) were uncertain of the generic affinities of divisa,
Metabola Chaudoir was found to occur here also when Bates described
Metabola vivida from Sonora and Arizona. Horn (1872) recognized Chaudoir ' s
genera as valid but later (1882) thought it best to regard them as sub-
genera. Since then the opinion of Horn has been followed by some wor-
kers while others have recognized some of the segregates of Chaudoir
as being generically valid. Thus Casey (1920) recognized Lebia, Loxopeza^
and Dianchomena but not Aphelogenia', Bradley (1930) recognized Lebia and
Dianchomena and not the others.
The first two species of Lebia in America north of Mexico to be
described were Fabricius 1776 and bAhiaiws Fabricius 1798, both
under the generic name Carabus . Say (1825) described four species of
Lebia although one of these [ornata ) was known to Melsheimer under the
na-m e quadrinotatus , a nomen nudum . Following Say North American species
of Lebia were described by many workers, most notably by Dejean,
LeConte, Chaudoir, Horn, Bates, and Casey. All the known species of
Lebia in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains were listed by
LeConte (1848). He recognized 23 species. In 1872, the year after
Chaudoir had finished his monograph of the known species of the world,
Horn gave a revision of the American species. Horn's key was the last
dealing with all the known American species . Although most species re-
cognized in this study were described from the area north of Mexico, a
number of species with predominantly southern distributions were ori-
ginally described from Mexico by Chevrolat or Bates. In the twentieth
century the taxonomy of Lebia was s eriously complicated whenT. L. Casey
described many new species, most of which have turned out to be syno-
nyms, and recognized as distinct many forms previously regarded as
having no taxonomic validity. The last species to be described in our
area was Malaena Hatch, 1953.
BIOLOGY
Information is available on the life cycle and immature stages of
very few species of Lebia. Silvestri (1904) described the life cycle of
Madge
141
Lebia scapularis Fourcroyin Europe and Chabous sou ( 1939) that of the North
American Lebia grandis Hentz. Lindroth (1954) described larvae of the
European Lebia chi or ocephala Hoffman. These three species in their laA'val
stages attack the pupating larvae and pupae of chrysomelid beetles . Pos-
sibly this is a habit of all species of Lebia . Accompanying this mode of
feeding there has been a striking hypermetamorphosis developed. The
following brief account of the life cycle is based upon that of grandis with
differences from the other two species noted where these are known.
Eggs are laid singly in the soil and, being covered with a sticky
secretion of the accessory glands, are camouflaged by the particles of
dirt sticking to them. The soil must be moist as the eggs are quite sus-
ceptible to desiccation. At 250 C the eggs hatch in 11 to 12 days.
Chabous sou found that in one case two pair s of grand/s produced 2600 larvae
even though one of the females died prematurely.
When the larvae hatch out they look like typical carabid larvae
about 3 to 4 mm long in grandis, with well developed legs, mouth parts,
and body sclerites. In both grandis and chlorocephala the tergal sclerites
are entire while in scapularis they are divided. This first active stage
then seeks out in the soil the pupating larvae and pupae of its host (for
grandis _ Leptinotarsa decemlineata , for chlorocephala - Chry solina varians and for
scapularis - Galerucella luteola ) . After feeding on the host chrysomelid the
first instar larva becomes greatly distended and has only weak powers
of locomotion. In nature it would thus probably feed only on a single
larva or pupa although in laboratory studies Lindroth was able to feed
the larva of chlorocephala as many as four host larvae or pupae. In grandis
and chlorocephala the first instar then molts to the second instar. In
scapularis the first instar larva before molting spins a cocoon from silk
secreted by the malpighian tubules. The second instar larva differs in
appearance from the first in that the appendages are all reduced and the
body sclerites are lacking. The second instar larva does not feed. It
molts to fourth pupal stage in grandis and chlorocephala , but in scapularis the
second instar larva molts into a form termed the "prepupa" by Silvestri.
This "prepupa" has the pupal characteristics but an abdomen of 10 seg-
ments. The "prepupa" then molts to the true pupa. In grandis develop-
ment from eclosion to emergence of the adult requires 15 to 20 days at
25 C.
The adult beetles are nocturnal and predaceous . Adults of scapularis
pass the winter at the base of plants and in the spring seek out and feed
upon the eggs and larvae of their host chrysomelid. After becoming
sexually mature they lay their eggs. Adults from this first generation
emerge in mid July and from these a second generation develops, the
adults of which hibernate.
In addition to grandis several other species of North American Lebia
as adults have been found to feed on chrysomelids although nothing is
known about the larvae. Cushmanand Isely (1916) found that in confine-
ment individuals oi Lebia fuscata ornata by them) would readily attack
callow adults and pupae of the cherry leaf beetle Galerucella cavicollis (LeC).
Isely (1920) found that adults of L. viridis fed upon eggs, larvae and pupae
of the grape vine flea beetles Altica chalybea 111. and A. woodsi Isely. Also,
Isely found that adult L. ornata "fed upon pupae and prepupae of the flea
beetles in confinement".
142
Revision of Lebia
TAXONOMIC CHARACTERS OF ADULTS
Color
Color and especially color pattern are very important in the iden-
tification and classification of the species of Lebia and are used both to
unite species into major groups and to separate some of the closely re-
lated species. There are three groups of colors found in Lebia: pale
colors (usually some shade of yellow or orange), metallic colors (usually
blue or green), and dark colors (usually black or brownish). The inter-
mediate condition between dark and pale is termed infuscated. In the
descriptions color is described by these terms (pale, dark, infuscated,
or metallic) with the actual color often noted in parentheses as well. By
using this scheme of nomenclature it is not necessary to describe the
variation within a color group. Metallic colors are readily recognized
as being such and dark and pale colors, in any one species, are usually
quite distinct.
External Morphology
In Lebia there are few external morphological characters of much
use for taxonomic purposes . Usually those available are difficult to in-
terpret and are often applicable to only a few species. However, these
are used in the identification of the species whenever possible.
In the descriptions the term “mouth parts" refers not only to the
mandibles, maxillae, and the labium but also to the labrum and to the
gula. The epilobes of the mentumare triangular flaps on the mesal side
of the lateral lobes of the mentum (fig. 1). They are said to be present
or absent. However, Horn (1884, 1882) pointed out that the epilobes are
actually always present and when stated to be absent are really just re-
duced. The epilobes, along with the tooth on the mentum, were used more
extensively in previous treatments of Lebia than they are here. These
structures are usually difficult to see and are mentioned only when nec-
nessary.
The neck region behind the eyes is usually moderately constricted
in Lebia (fig. 2). However, in three species it is very strongly constricted
(fig. 3) and there is a strong sulcus across the neck in front of the occi-
pital suture.
In previous works on Lebia the shape of the pronotum was des-
cribed in detail, but this is not done here. The differences between
species are usually slight, the variation within a species is often exten-
sive, and better characters are available elsewhere for identification.
Illustrations of the pronotum are presented only for those species in
which the pronotum is not the typical transverse shape (fig. 6).
The wings of Lebia (fig. 13) show several useful characters which
in a few species allow reliable identifications to be made of either sex
where otherwise only males could be identified by an examination of the
endophallic armature. To examine the wings the beetle was relaxed in
near boiling water, the left elytron was then raised, and the left wing
broken off at the base with a fine pair of forceps. This wing was first
studied in water and then flattened out and glued on a card to be pinned
beneath the specimen. It could subsequently be studied on the card.
Madge
143
The veins are named (fig. 13) according to the system of Balfour-
Browne (1943). This system is preferred to that of Forbes (1922) be-
cause in respect to the cubital and anal veins (which are of taxonomic
importance in Lebia) it is in better agreement with the homologies based
upon the axillary sclerites as outlined by Snodgrass (1935). According
to Snodgrass the first anal vein (called postcubitus) in winged insects is
usually more closely associated with the base of the cubitus than with the
third axillary sclerite and the rest of the anals but in Neuroptera, Mec-
optera and Trichoptera it is grouped with the other anal veins. As the
Coleoptera are related to the Neuroptera probably the first anal vein in
beetles is also associated with the third axillary sclerite. On this as-
sumption the first anal vein in the Coleoptera is the vein which Forbes
called 2A3. Forbes' lA plus the branches 2A^ and 2A£ are considered
here as branches of Cu2.
The apical pinch of the elytron is a narrow flattened area along
the suture at the apex. This pinch is usually well developed (fig. 10) but
in two species, bivittata and bilineata , it is much reduced.
The basal ridge of the elytron is an extension of the lateral ridge
of the elytral disc across the base. If complete it extends across the
grooves on either side of the scutellum (here termed the parascutellar
grooves); if incomplete it ends at the brow of the groove. Some speci-
mens of species in which the basal ridge is typically complete lack it but
the opposite is never true as far as I know.
The lateral lobes of the abdominal sterna are shallow lateral ex-
tensions of the posterior margins of the sterna, best developed on the
fourth and fifth segments. The central part of the posterior margin,
flanked by the lateral lobes, is referred to as the central trough (figs.
11, 12).
Male Genitalia
Both the endophallic armature and the apex of the median lobe
afford taxonomic characters for the recognition of the species of Lebia.
In most species recognized in this study the armature of the endophallus
is distinctive. The shape of the apex of the median lobe is of diagnostic
value in a few species. Most species can be identified by external char-
acters alone but, in a few, reliable identification can be made only from
the male genitalia.
For the study of the endophallus the genitalia were removed from
a male beetle. The genitalia were then cleared in a hot 10% solution of
potassium hydroxide for about one minute. For small specimens 30 to
40 seconds was often enough while for large specimens a couple of min-
utes were required. After treatment with the KOH the genital structures
were washed in water. The endophallus could usually be everted by
squeezing the median lobe beginning at the base and progressing towards
the apex. It was usually necessary to complete the eversion by inserting
a hooked minuten needle into the endophallus to catch the tip and pull it
out. In specimens stored in alcohol before mounting the endophallus
could not be everted (it usually tore). This could be remedied by boiling
the cleared genitalia ina soapy solution for 10 to 15 minutes, after which
eversion could be accomplished in the usual way. The genital structures
144
Revision of Lebia
were stored in glycerine in a microvial, or glued on a small card, on the
pin beneath the beetle from which they were extracted.
Measurements
In a few instances measurements are useful for specific identi-
fication of species or for the analysis of intraspecific variation. Because
total length could not be measured satisfactorily and conveniently relative
size has been indicated by length of the elytra as measured from the
base of the humeral area to the apex. The range in length was obtained
from all specimens available while the mean elytral length for each
species was calculated from measurements made on a sample of 20 to
30 specimens (when available). This sample included the largest and
smallest specimens . To avoid bias as muchas possible specimens to be
measured were not picked individually but rather were picked in groups
(usually two or three rows of specimens in a unit tray). Width of the
pronotum was measured at the widest point and length was measured
along the midline. All measurements were made with a ruled eyepiece
in a stereoscopic microscope to the nearest half unit. At 25^, used for
measurements under 4. 8 mm, one unit is 0. 04 mm; at 12^, used for
measurements over 4. 8 mm, one unit is 0. 08 mm.
Illustrations and Maps
The drawings were made with the aid of an ocular grid in a ster-
eoscopic microscope. In the illustrations of the endophallus little im-
portance should be placed on indications of wrinkles, bulges and folds in
the endophallus except in a few cases which are noted in the descriptions .
For each species the everted endophallus has been drawn in the most ap-
propriate of four views to show the armature. These have been termed
apical, abapical, left and right views according to the position of the
apex of the median lobe when the median lobe is towards the top of the
drawing and the endophallus towards the bottom. In an apical view the
apex of the median lobe is in front of the endophallus (fig. 66); in an
abapical view, the opposite, the apex is hidden behind the endophallus
(fig. 67). In a left view the apex is to the left of the drawing and in a
right view the apex is to the right (figs. 64, 65). Using this nomenclature
the endophallus of a dissected specimen can be oriented with the drawings.
For the species of the subgenus Loxopeza where the endophallic armature
is very complex the endophallus has been drawn as if slit down the ab-
apical side and spread out. This allows for ready comparisons between
species. For the same purpose the groups of spines have been numbered
as in fig. 50. In all the other species the endophallus was drawn whole
in one or more of the four positions listed above. The simpler armature
of these does not require any nomenclatural system for the various groups
of spines.
Distribution maps aregivenfor all species except those with very
restricted ranges . On the maps dots are not placed for all records avail-
able (all records are listed separately) but rather only enough to show the
limits of distribution as I know them and to fill out the range. Dots re-
present counties or more restricted localities; stars are used when
only a state locality is available on the label.
Madge
145
In the lists of localities given for each species counties, if not
given, have been added where possible except for localities in Canada
where counties are not consistently used. In addition, no counties have
been given for non-restricted localities which are in two or more coun-
ties (mountain ranges, large lakes, national parks) unless this infor-
mation is given on the label.
Recognition of Moles and Females
As the male genitalia play an integral part in the identification of
at least some of the species of Lebia , it is important to be able to distin-
guish betweenmale and female specimens. Several characters facilitate
this. Males of all species have apreapical notch on the inner side of the
mesotibia (fig. 16), have a double row of papillate hair s on theunderside
of the first three protarsal segments (fig. 18), and lack the pair of in-
wardly placed setae on the apical abdominal sternum (fig. 11). Females
lack both thepreapical notch on the mesotibiae and the papillate hairs on
the underside of the protarsi, but have a pair of more inwardly set setae
on the apical abdominal sternum (fig. 12). In addition, males of the sub-
genus Loxopeza have the first three protarsal segments obliquely dilated
mesad (fig. 17) while in the females these segments are normal. Inmost
males the circumgenital ring protrudes from the end of the abdomen.
Of the three characters applying to the whole genus the presence
or absence of the preapical notch on the mesotibia is the easiest to use
as the apex of the mesotibia is usually visible in pinned specimens. The
undersurfaces of the protarsi are often folded close to the body and can-
not be seen without relaxing the specimen. The long setae on the last
abdominal sternum may be broken off leaving only small foveae. The
arrangement is then more difficult to discern. There is some variation
in the number of setae but this variation occurs only in the row common
to both male and female and the seta which indicates a female is always
present in this sex.
Synonymy
Several points in the specific synonymies need to be clarified.
Subgenera where used by an author are indicated in parentheses. If an
author made no distinctionbetween varieties and subspecies then varietal
names are listed as being subspecific. Otherwise they are not listed at
all. Type localities have been determined from the descriptions only and
may be more restricted on the label of the type specimen. Names of
journals are abbreviated according to the World List of Scientific Per-
iodicals, third edition.
Criteria for Species and Subspecies
Following the currently accepted definition, species are "groups
of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations, which are
reproductively isolated from other such groups" (Simpson 1961). In
museum specimens the evidence on which reproductive isolation is judged
is necessarily based onmorphological and geographical characters. Two
forms were regarded as specifically distinct if they overlapped geograph-
ically and did not intergrade in the area of overlap in at least one mor-
146
Revision of Lebia
phological character. Sympatric forms differing only in color were con-
sidered conspecific. Sympatric forms which differed slightly in mor-
phology (and usually in color) but which tended to intergrade could be
either distinct species or polymorphic variants . In these cases the rea-
sons for the decisionmade are given in the discus sion under the species
concerned.
Allopatric forms were regarded as conspecific if there were in-
termediate forms in the intermediate geographical area or if the geo-
graphically nearest specimens approached each other in their distinguish-
ing characters. Allopatric forms not covered by the above statement
were regarded as specifically distinct if they differed in morphological
or color character s to the same extent as or more than other good species
did; or conspecific if they did not.
No subspecies have been recognized in this study. Intraspecific
variation is described and where possible dines are pointed out.
TAXONOMY
Genus Lebia Latreille
Description
Small to medium sized beetles. Color various and varied.
Head . Prognathous, slightly drooping; eyes usually prominent.
Labrum more or less truncate, with six setae across anterior margin.
Clypeus with a single seta on each side. Fronswith or without sculpture;
with two supraorbital setae above each eye. Mandibles moderately pro-
minent and with a distinct scrobe; labium with postmentum divided into
a mentum and a submentum; mentum with or without epilobes and a
tooth; ligula with paraglossae short and usually not extending beyond
glossae; palpi cylindrical, pointed or truncate apically, penultimate
segment of labial palpus usually bisetose. Antennae usually with seg-
ments one to three and basal third of segment four glabrous; extending
back to basal third or fourth of elytra. Neck usually moderately con-
stricted, sometimes strongly so, rarely rather stout.
Prothorax. Pronotum usually distinctly transverse in shape and
always with a basal lobe; lateral margins usually widened basally, oc-
casionally narrow throughout, with a seta just anterior to middle and at
basal corner; disc with variable sculpture.
Pterothorax . Wings fully developed; oblongum cell often reduced;
second branch of cubitus not forked. Metepimeron narrow.
Elytra. Apex obliquely truncate and usually slightly sinuate. Disc
usually somewhat flattened, with nine striae (usually distinct) and a scu-
tellar stria; intervals flat to strongly convex, third interval with two
dorsal punctures next to third stria; ninth interval with a series of um-
bilicate punctures, with one puncture at the outer apical corner set in-
ward and forming a jog in the series; base of disc with a strong groove
on each side of the scutellum; basal ridge complete or incomplete; api-
cal pinch usually large and well developed, rarely small.
Legs . Protibiae with or without an upper spur. Mesotibiae of
males with a preapical notch on inner side, rarely more than one. Fourth
Madge
147
tarsal segment of hind tarsus emarginate or bilobed. Tarsal claws al-
ways pectinate.
Abdomen. Venter with segments bearing shallow lateral lobes
along posterior margins. Pygidium with a mid- longitudinal keel.
Male genitalia . Parameres small, right smaller than left. Median
lobe with shape of apex various. Endophallus usually armed.
Discussion
Since its recognition the genus Lebia has undergone extensive
modification, first by the splitting off of the more distinctive groups in-
to separate genera and then by the absorption of some of these genera
back again as subgenera. Chaudoir (1870-71) recognized on a world
basis 22 genera (most of which had their species originally described as
Lebia ) as belonging to his group Lebiides and additional genera have since
been described. At the present time there is no generally accepted de-
finition of Lebia. While this taxon certainly does not include all the gen-
era which have been placed near it, it does seem to include many of
them. For the North American species the following seven characters,
when taken as a group, are regarded as being diagnostic and separate
Lebia clearly from the other lebiine genera in our fauna.
1. Pronotum lobed at base (fig. 5-9)
2. One umbilical puncture at outer apical corner of elytra set in,
thus forming a jog in the series (fig. 10)
3. Elytra "pinched" along the suture at the apex (fig. 10)
4. Pygidium (seventh abdominal ter gum) with a weak midlongitudinal
Carina
5. Abdominal sterna with shallow lateral lobes (figs. 11, 12)
6. Vein Cu^ not forked (fig. 13)
7. Males with a preapical notch on inside of mesotibiae (fig. 16)
In addition all species are probably parasitoids of chrysomelid leaf beet-
les.
Included with Lebia s.s. in this study, either as subgenera or sy-
nonyms, are the following groups: Aphelogenia Chaudoir, Dianchomena
Chaudoir, Lamprias Bonelli, Loxopeza Chaudoir, and Metabola Chaudoir.
Of the many exotic groups placed near Lebia , Lia Eschscholtz and
Lachnolebia Maindron have been seen and found to possess all seven of the
characters set down for Lebia. In addition G, E. Ball has kindly checked
examples in several European museums of most genera near Lebia for
the above characters except the fifth and sixth. The following groups
possess all five: Cymatographa Chaudoir, Ectomomesa Chaudoir, Grammica
Chaudoir, Helcosopha Chaudoir, Hemicycla Chaudoir, Lebidema Motschoulsky,
Metalebia Jeannel, Nematopeza Chaudoir, Orthobasis Chaudoir, Poecilostola
Chaudoir, Poecilothais Maindron and Promecochila ChdiUdoir . Four groups,
Lebistinida Peringuey, Rhopalostyla Chaudoir, Scythropa Chaudoir and Stephana
Chaudoir, possess the first four of the above characters but as the speci-
mens available were females the seventh character could not be checked.
In the species checked of Pachylebia Jeannel, Lebistina Motschoulsky and
Diacoptodera Alluaud the first four characters were present but males lacked
the preapical notch in the mesotibiae. I have s een one specimen of Lebistina
(a male) which had a series of very shallow preapical notches on the
148
Revision of Lebia
mesotibia. The loss (or reduction) of this character in these groups is
probably secondary. In the examples of Liopeza Chaudoir and Lionedya
Chaudoir the abdomen could not be seen to check the pygidial keel but
otherwise they were like Lebia as far as could be checked. All of the
above groups are probably Lebia as here defined. Arsinoe Castelnau,
Dromiotes Jeannel, Lebiomorpha Muller, Paralebia Peringuey and Scalidion
Schmidt- Goebel are probably not . Aristolebia Bates, Daer A. Semenov
and Znojko and Metabele Peringuey were not seen.
Key to the subgenera and species of Lebia in America north of Mexico
1 Upper protibial spur present 2
Upper protibial spur absent subgenus LEBIA 11
2(1) Frons and pronotum with many coarse setiferous punctures;
elytral disc metallic with the basal third pale
subgenus LAMPRl AS divisa LeC. , p. 165
Frons and pronotum without coarse setiferous punctures; ely-
tral disc either entirely metallic or entirely pale 3
3(2) Elytral disc entirely pale; proepisternum with longitudinal wrin-
kles suhgenns POLYCHELOMA lecontei new na.me, p. 164
Elytral disc entirely metallic; proepisternum smooth
subgenus LOXOPEZA 4
4(3) Frons dark (usually black) 5
F rons pale 6
5(4) Palpi and antennae pale; distribution - eastern half of United
States and adjacent Canada (fig. 126) tricolor Say, p. 156
Palpi and usually antennal segments 4 to 11 dark; distribution -
western half of United States and adjacent Canada except west
coast (fig. 141) atriceps LeC., p. 155
6(4) Palpi and usually antennal segments 4 to 11 dark; distribution -
eastern two thirds of United States and adjacent Canada (fig.
117) atriventris Say, p. 153
Palpi and antennae pale; distribution - eastern United States and
adjacent Canada, in the southwest to Arizona 7
7 (6) Elytral intervals strongly convex; elytral disc a dull green,
sometimes almost black; distribution - southeastern Arizona. .
pimalis (Csy. ), p. 159
Elytral intervals at most moderately convex; elytral coloration
variable 8
8(7) Anal margin of wing justdistadof vein 3A2 with sclerotized patch
strongly arched (fig. 14); armature of male endophallus as in
figs. 57, 58; distribution - eastern United States and in south to
Arizona 9
Anal margin of wing with sclerotized patch weakly arched (fig.
15); armature of male endophallus as in figs. 54, 55; distribution -
western Texas to Arizona 10
9(8) Distribution - eastern United States and adjacent Canada, in the
south possibly as far west as Davis Mountains, Texas; Texas
specimens with the third group on the endophallus large (fig. 58)
grandis Hentz, p. 161
Distribution - western Texas to Arizona; third group of spines
Madge
149
10(8)
11(1)
12(11)
13(11)
14(13)
15(14)
16(15)
17(16)
18(17)
19(18)
20(18)
21(13)
on the endophallus small (fig. 57) subgrandis, n. sp.,p. 160
Length of elytra 3. 80 to 4. 68 mm subdola n. sp.,p. 157
Length of elytra 6. 13 to 7. 33 mm deceptrix n. sp.,p. 158
Elytral disc metallic with pale fasciae 12
Elytral disc entirely metallic, entirely dark, or dark with pale
markings 13
Frons with coarse punctures and short erect hairs (best seen in
lateral view); third antennal segment distinctly hairy
pulchella Dej. (in part), p. 167
Frons without coarse punctures and short erect hairs; third
antennal segment with only a few scattered short hairs in addition
to the long distal hairs bitaeniata Chev. , p. 171
Elytral disc metallic (either blue or green) and pronotum pale .
14
Elytral disc dark, dark with pale markings or metallic but when
metallic, pronotum is dark 21
Pronotal margins narrow throughout (fig. 8) neck strongly con-
stricted abdominalis Chd. , p. 198
Pronotal margins widened baaally; neck not strongly constricted
15
Head metallic (blue or green); femora dark distally
viridipennis Dej., p. 170
Head darker pale but not metallic; femora entirely dark or pale
16
Basal ridge of elytra incomplete; distribution - Florida
lecta Horn, p. 213
Basal ridge of elytra usually complete; distribution - not in
Florida 17
Pterothoracic sclerites dark like abdomen; head dark (usually
black, reddish black in Montana, Alberta, and Saskatchewan
specimens) cyanipennis Dej. (in part), p. 176
Pterothoracic sclerites pale (except sometimes metepisternum),
contrasting with color of abdomen; head pale 18
Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed; distribution - southeas-
tern Texas or northeastern United States and adjacent Canada
(fig. 138) 19
Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate; distribution - south-
western Texas to southern California 20
Distribution - southeastern Texas; armature of male endophallus
as in figs. 66, 67 rufopleura Schfr. , p. 172
Distribution - northeastern United States and adjacent Canada;
armature of male endophallus as in fig. 11 ^pleuritica ~LeC , , p. 173
Metepisternum usually pale, occasionally dark; elytral intervals
usually moderately convex; microsculpture of frons usually dis-
tinct tuckeri (Csy. ), p. 174
Metepisternum infuscated; elytral intervals flat or weakly con-
vex; microsculpture of frons lacking or indistinct
arizonica Schfr. , p. 175
Head, pronotal disc and entire elytral disc either dark or metal-
lic 22
150
Revision of Lebia
22(21)
23(22)
24(23)
25(24)
26(25)
27(21)
28(27)
Elytral disc usually maculate, if entirely dark then pronotum
pale . 27
Pronotum bicolored, lateral margins pale and disc dark
marginicollis Dej. , p. 180
Pronotum. entirely dark, at most with tinges of red at sides. . . .
Frons with strong punctation and short erect hairs (the latter
best seen in lateral view); third antennal segment distinctly
hairy pulchella Dej. (in part), p. 167
Frontal punctation usually not strong and never with short erect
hairs; third antennal segment with only a few scattered short
hairs in addition to the long distal hairs 24
Lateral lobes of penultimate abdominal sternum each wider than
the central trough (fig. 12); third antennal segment usually pale;
basal ridge of elytra incomplete; elytral disc usually dark, or
if metallic, then legs pale pumila Dej., p. 215
Lateral lobes of penultimate abdominal sternum each equal to or
narrower than the central trough (fig. 11); if elytral disc dark
then basal ridge is usually complete and third segment is dark;
legs never pale 25
Frons and pronotum dark, elytral disc metallic; frons with fine
punctures but no fine striations; basal ridge of elytra usually
complete; distribution - southern British Columbia, Alberta, and
Saskatchewan to New Mexico, Arizona, and southern California
(fig. 129) cyanipennis Dej. (in part), p. 176
Not as above in color or if frons and pronotum black and elytra
metallic, then frons with fine striations (especially at sides) and
basal ridge of elytra incomplete 26
Frons and pronotum usually shiny black, sometimes with a met-
allic green tinge, elytra metallic; basal ridge of elytra incom-
plete; distribution - southern British Columbia to southern Cali-
fornia; endophallus with armature as in figs. 76, 77
perita Csy. , p. 182
Frons and pronotum concolorous with the elytral disc, either
metallic or black; basal ridge usually complete; distribution -
transcontinental; endophallus with armature as in figs. 72, 73.
viridis Say, p. 177
Lateral pronotal margins narrow throughout; head dark (usually
black) 28
Lateral pronotal margins widened basally; color of head var-
ious ... 29
Abdomen entirely pale; epipleuron dark and each elytron with
two pale vittae bivittata (Fab.), p. 195
Basal half of abdomen dark, apical half pale; epipleuron dark or
pale; each elytron usually with only one pale vitta, sometimes
two when epipleuron pale hilineata Mots. , p. 197
Neck strongly constricted; head pale (vertex sometimes slightly
infuscated); frons striated at least on lateral thirds 30
Neck not strongly constricted; head color and frontal sculpture
variable 31
29(27)
Madge
151
30(29)
31(29)
32(31)
33(32)
34(33)
35(31)
36(35)
37(35)
38(37)
39(38)
40(38)
Frons completely striated; elytra with a common sutural vitta
and two lateral spots; distribution - southern Arizona
miranda (Horn), p. 188
Frons striated on lateral thirds only; elytra with a common su-
tural vitta and two lateral vittae; distribution - eastern United
States and adjacent Canada (fig. 131) solea Hentz, p. 187
Femora dark at least distally 32
Femora entirely pale 35
Elytra with a dark sutural vitta and a lateral spot on posterior
half of elytra (sometimes joined to dark sutural vitta)
histrionica Bates, p. 192
Elytra with a dark sutural vitta and a dark lateral vitta, rarely
entire elytral disc (except apex and lateral margins) dark
33
Common sutural vitta furcate basally, rarely entire elytral disc
(except apex and lateral margins) dark and furcation obscured;
basal ridge of elytra usually complete vittata (Fab,), p. 189
Common sutural vitta not furcate basally, elytra not entirely
dark except apex and lateral margins; basal ridge of elytra in-
complete 34
Head black; distribution - Arizona . . . .nigricapitata n. sp. , p. 194
Head pale; distribution - eastern United States and adjacent
Canada pectita Horn, p, 19/^
Frons dark (usually black) and distinctly striated except a tri-
angular area above clypeus; abdomen pale 36
Not with above combination of characters 37
Pronotum distinctly striate (like frons) on anterior lateral re-
gions; apical pale marking on elytra interrupted by a fine dark
edging along suture analis Dej. , p. 184
Pronotum rugose on anterior lateral regions; apical pale marking
on elytra uninterrupted by a dark edging along suture
scalpta Bates, p. 186
Head with fine deep punctures on frons; typical elytral pattern
as in fig. 42; pronotal disc dark, margins pale
lohulata LeC. , p. 207
Head without fine deep punctures on frons; elytral patternnot as
above; coloration of pronotum variable 38
Elytral patternasin fig. 37 (note dark apex of elytra) or posterior
part of frons and vertex rugose-striate; mentum without a tooth
39
Elytral pattern not as above and frons and vertex not rugose-
striate; mentum usually with a tooth, lacking only in insulata . . .
40
Abdomen entirely dark; frons usually only rugose on lateral
thirds guttula LeC., p. ^99
Abdomen dark at sides, pale medially; frons usually entirely
rugose-striate ahdita n. sp. , p. 201
Basal ridge of elytra usually complete; pale apical spot of elytra
shaped as in figs. 38-41 or apex of elytra entirely dark ; dis-
tribution - Arizona 41
152
Revision of Lebia
Basal ridge of elytra incomplete; elytra with pale apical spot
shaped as in figs. 43-48 or absent; distribution - eastern half
of United States and adjacent Canada 45
41(40) Apex of elytra dark, pale marking usually restricted to humeral
area, sometimes extending three fourths of the elytra but never
much onto the mesal half; abdomen dark . . . scapula Horn, p. 183
Apex of elytra always pale, basal pale markings extending well
over onto the mesal half of the elytra; abdomen pale 42
42(41) Pale basal marking of elytra shaped as in fig. 38; distribution -
southeastern Texas; mentum without a tooth
insulata n. sp. , p. 2 02
Pale basal marking of elytra shaped as in figs. 39-41; distri-
bution - not in southeastern Texas; mentum with a tooth .... 43
43(42) Distribution - western Texas to Arizona 44
Distribution - not in above area (fig. 127) . . ,fuscata Dej. , p. 203
44(43) Elytral disc with at least a lateral dark spot, usually a complete
vitta (fig. 40); frons with a deep groove next to eyes
subrugosa Chd. , p. 205
Elytral disc without a lateral dark spot (fig. 41); frons without
a deep groove next to eyes perpallida n. sp. , p. 2 06
45(40) Elytra vaulted and patterned as in fig. 48; distribution - south-
eastern Texas; head pale bumeliae Schfr. , p. 213
Elytra flattened and not patterned as above; distribution - Texas
and eastern United States; head dark (reddish brown) in Texas.
46
46(45) Elytral disc entirely dark except for lateral margin; frons equally
dark; wing with a triangular remnant of oblongum cell; abdomen
pale, darkening apically collaris Dej., p. 214
Color of elytral disc not as above or if so then wing without a
triangular remnant of oblongum cell and abdomen pale through-
out 47
47(46) Elytral pattern as in fig. 47 (note shape of basal pale spot, that
basal dark marking is always present and that this marking joins
or approaches the middle dark fascia which extends forward along
the side of the elytral disc); endophallic armature of male as in
fig. Ill calliope Bates, p. 212
Elytral pattern as in figs. 43-46 or entirely dark except lateral
margin; endophallic armature of male as in figs. 108-110 ....
48
48(47) Distribution - eastern Texas; endophallic armature as in figs.
109-110; elytral disc (fig. 46) with dark circum-scutellar spot
usually not extending over to shoulder, when it does it usually
gradually becomes paler and is not divided by pale basal spot . .
esurialis Csy. , p. 211
Distribution - eastern United States (including eastern Texas)
and adjacent Canada; endophallic armature as in fig. 108; in
Texas elytra when largely pale (fig. 44) with a circumscutellar
and a humeral spot divided by an arm of the basal pale spot . . .
ornata Say, p. 208
Madge
153
Subgenus Loxopeza Chaudoir
Loxopeza Chaudoir 1870 : 138. Type species - Leb ia grandis Hentz (here de-
signated) .
Description
Characters in common among the species north of Mexico are
given in the following subgeneric description and are not repeated in the
species descriptions.
Head - Variable in color. Frons punctate-rugose, especially at
sides, microsculpture variable. Mentumwith a small tooth and epilobes;
ligula with paraglossae not extending beyond glossae. Palpi slender,
apex more or less pointed; penultimate segment of labial palpi bisetose.
Antennae variable in color, with segments one to three and basal third
of four more or less glabrous. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale (in species north of Mexico) , lateral mar-
gins of pronotum palest. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral mar-
gins widened basally; disc rugose and with distinct microsculpture.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale (in species north
of Mexico). Wings with oblongum cell complete.
Elytra _ Disc metallic; color of epipleura dark or pale. Disc
with striae distinct, convexity of intervals variable; apical pinch well
developed; basal ridge complete.
Legs - Largely pale (in species north of Mexico). Protibiae with
an upper spur present. Mesotibiae of males with a single preapical
notch. Fourth segment of hind tarsus usually emarginate, sometimes
bilobed.
Abdomen _ Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia - Median lobe stout, apex short and broad (fig. 49).
Endophallus strongly armed.
Discussion
Recognition - The diagnostic character s of the subgenus Loxopeza are:
upper protibial spur present, a complete oblongum cell in the wing, a
small tooth and epilobes on the mentum, elytra metallic, the male geni-
talia with a short broad apex to the median lobe, and the endophallus
heavily armed. The upper protibial spur and completely metallic elytra
readily distinguish the subgenus Loxopeza from the other subgenera of
Lebia north of Mexico.
Taxonomic status - Previous workers disagreed as to the status and
limits of Loxopeza, it being regarded as a distinct genus, a distinct sub-
genus within Lebia, or not distinct at all from Lebia. Sometimes similarly
colored species of Lebia s.s. were included within it. The species of
Loxopeza are clearly members of the genus Lebia as defined here. How-
ever, a& they occupy a primitive and isolated position within Lebia they
are regarded as forming a distinct subgenus.
1. Lebia (Loxopeza) atriventris Say
Lebia atriventris Say 1825 : 13. Type locality - not given. Dejean 1826:
454. LeConte 1848 : 193. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and
Harold 1868 : 136. Blatchley 1910 : 144. Leng 1920 : 65 {Loxopeza).
Csiki 1932 : 1316 (Loxopeza). Blackwelder 1944 : 53.
154
Revision of Lebia
Loxopeza atriventris \ Chaudoir 1870 : 142. Horn 1872 : 131. Bates 4RR3 T
220. Casey 1920 : 235.
Loxopeza enormis Casey 1920 : 257. Type locality - New York (near the
city). NHW SYNONYMY.
Lebi a enormis ; Csiki 1932 : 1316 {Loxopeza),
Description
Length of elytra - 3.40-5.40 mm; mean (22 specimens) 4,22 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale; microsculpture
on frons usually distinct. Mouth parts pale except dark palpi. Antennae
with basal three and a third segments pale, others usually dark or in-
fuscated, becoming paler apically.
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually ; blue) ; epipleura dark. Disc with,
intervals usually very weakly convex, almost flat.
Legs - Entirely pale except for infuscated tarsi. Fourth segment
of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male Genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 51 (note that some
of the spines of the fourth group are rounded and not pointed apically,
that the sixth group of spines is formed from short broad spines arranged
to form a vertical rectangle, and the seventh group is lacking). The
endophallic armature in five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - The only pale headed Loxopeza in the range of atriventris
is grandis which is larger, with the elytral intervals more strongly con-
vex, and the palpi pale. Superficially atriventris is very similar to pleuritica
but the latter lacks an upper protibial spur and has the epipleura pale
instead of dark.
Variation - Lebia atriventris shows only minor variation. The fourth
segment of the hind tarsus has been described in the past as being bi-
lobed or strongly emarginate but this does not seem to be the typical
condition. Specimens examined all had the fourth segment emarginate.
As in atriceps antennal segments 4-11 are sometimes pale, the elytral
disc is occasionally greenish, and the elytral intervals may be some-
what more strongly convex.
Synonymy - Casey's Loxopeza enormis , with its blackish antennae and
emarginate fourth tarsal segment, is clearly a synonym of atriventris .
Distribution - Lebia atriventris occurs in the eastern half of the United
States and adjacent Canada (fig. 117). Over 950 specimens were studied
from the following localities.
CANADA
MANITOBA - Makinack; Winnipeg. ONTARIO - Belleville; Grand Bend; Hillcrest; Leamington; Normandale; Ottawa;
Point Pelee National Park; Port Colborne; Prince Edward Co.; Ridgeway; Bondeau; Simcoe; Strathroy; Toronto;
Trenton; Vineland Station. QUEBEC - lanorale; Montreal; Saint Ailaine. SASKATCHEWAN - Saskatoon.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Auburn (Lee Co.); Cheaha State Park (Clay Co.); Mobile (Mobile Co.). CALIFORNIA. CONNECTICUT -
Cornwall (Litchfield Co.); Lakeville (Litchfield Co.); Litchfield (Litchfield Co.); Lyme (New London Co.); New
Haven (New Haven Co.); Stamford (Fairfield Co.); Stores (Tolland Co.); Suffield (Hartford Co.). DELAWARE -
Newark (New Castle Co.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Jacksonville (Duval Co. ).
ILLINOIS - Beverley Hills; Bowmanville; Chicago (Cook Co.); Downers Grove (Du Page Co. );
Edgebrook; Eldorado (Saline Co.); Evanston (Cook Co. ); Fox Ridge State Park (Coles Co.); Glenview (Cook Co. );
Grand Detour; Grand Tower (Jackson Co.); Illinois Beach State Park (Lake Co.); Joliet (Will Co.); Kickapoo State
Park (Vermilion Co. ) ; LaGrange (Cook Co.); Lake Zurich (Lake Co.); Lyons (Cook Co.); Macon Co. ; Palos Park
(Cook Co.); Quincy (Adams Co.); Riverside (Cook Co. ); Urbana (Champaign Co. ) ; Utica (LaSalle Co.). INDIANA -
Beverley Shores (Porter Co.); Dune Park; Fulton Co.; Gary (Lake Co.); Hammond (Lake Co.); Knox Co.; Lafayette
(Tippecanoe Co .) ; Lagrange Co. ; Long Lake; Marion Co.; Mineral Springs; Pine; Posey Co. ; Putnam Co. ; Tremont;
Madge
155
Vigo Co. IOWA - Ames (Story Co.); Council Bluffs (Pottawattamie Co.); Crawford Co. 1 Iowa City (Johnson Co. ) ;
Mount Pleasant (Henry Co. ) ; Polk Co.; Sioux City (Woodbury Co. ) Waukon (Allamakee Co. ). KANSAS - Chanute (Neosho
Co.); Kiowa Co.; Lawrence (Douglas Co.); Manhattan (Riley Co.); Mount Hope (Sedgwick Co. ) ; Onaga (Pottawatomie
Co.); Rage (Kingman Co. ) ; Saline Co.; Topeka (Shawnee Co.); Wellington (Sumner Co.). KENTUCKY. LOUISIANA -
Ruston (Lincoln Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City); College Park (Prince George# Co.); Forest Glen
(Montgomery Co. ); Frederick (Frederick Co. ) ; Hagerstown (Washington Co. ) ; Marshall Hall (Charles Co. ) ; Patuxent
Refuge (Prince Georges Co.); Plummers Island; Plum Point (Calvert Co.); Sparrows Point (Baltimore Co.); Suitland
(Prince Georges Co.); Travilah. MASSACHUSETTS - Arlington (Middlesex Co.); Boston (Suffolk Co.); Brookline
(Norfolk Co. ); Cambridge (Middlesex Co. ) ; Chicopee (Hampden Co. ) ; Framingham (Middlesex Co. ); Humarock (Ply-
mouth Co.); Lexington (Middlesex Co. ) ; Nahant (Essex Co. ) ; Needham (Norfolk Co. ) ; Revere (Suffolk Co. ) ; Saugus
(Essex Co.); Sherborn (Middlesex Co. ) ; Springfield (Hampden Co. ) . MICHIGAN - Alcona Co. ; Ann Arbor (Washtenaw
Co.); Beaver Island (Charlevoix Co. ) ; Bloomfield (Oakland Co. ) ; Cheboygan Co. ; Cooper Woods (Oakland Co. ) ; Detroit
(Wayne Co.); East Lansing (Ingham Co.); E. K. Warren Preserve, Sawyer (Barrien Co.); George Reserve (Livingston
Co.); Grand Ledge (EatonCo.); High Island (Charlevoix Co. ) ; Huron Mountain Club (Marquette Co.); Marquette (Mar-
quette Co.); Marysville (Saint Clair Co.)! Mason (Ingham Co.); Mecosta Co.; Milford (Oakland Co.); Mottawa; Nau-
binway (Mackinac Co.); Palmer Park (Wayne Co.); Paw Paw Lake (Van Buren Co.); Pigeon (Huron Co.); Port Huron
(Saint Clair Co.); Rochester (Oakland Co.); Poyal Oak (Oakland Co. ) ; Sanford (Midland Co.); Saugatuck (Allegan Co.);
Shiawasse Co. ; Silver Lake State Park (OceanaCo.); Southfield (Oakland Co.); South Fox Island (Leelanan Co.); South
Haven (Van Buren Co.); Sutton Farm (Lapeer Co.); Three Oaks (Barrien Co.); Whitefish Point (Chippewa Co.).
MINNESOTA - Big Stone Co.; Crookston (Polk Co.); Cyrus (Pope Co.); Frontenac (Goodhue Co.); Gray Cloud Island;
Hallock (Kittson Co. ) ; Houston Co. ; Mille Lacs Co.; Minneapolis (Hennepin Co. ); Mississippi Bluff (Houston Co. ) ;
Mora (Kanabec Co.); Olmsted Co.; Saint Paul (Ramsey Co.); Saint Peter (Nicollet Co.); Two Harbors (Lake Co.).
MISSISSIPPI - Camp Shelby (Forrest Co.). MISSOURI - Branson (Taney Co.); Kansas City (Jackson Co.); Saint Louis
(Independent City); Springfield (Greene Co. ) . MONTANA - Billings (Yellowstone Co. ) . NEBRASKA - Lincoln (Lancaster
Co.); Omaha (Douglas Co.); Saltillo (Lancaster Co. ) ; Waverly (Lancaster Co.). NEW HAMPSHIRE - Cornish; Exeter
(Rockingham Co. ) . NEW JERSEY - Arlington (HudsonCo.); Bergenfield (BergenCo.); Boonton (Morris Co. ) ; Collings-
wood (Camden Co.); Chester (Morris Co.); Clemton; Durham P. ; Emerson (BergenCo.); Fort Lee (BergenCo.);
Greenwood Lake; Hillsdale (Bergen Co.); Lavallette (Ocean Co.); Manasquan (Monmouth Co.); Morristown (Morris
Co.); Newark (Essex Co.); New Brunswick (Middlesex Co.); Phillipsburg (Warren Co.); Point Pleasant (Ocean Co.);
Riverton (Burlington Co. ); Snake Hille; South Orange (Essex Co. ); Westwood (Bergen Co. ) ; Woodbury (Gloucester Co.).
NEW YORK - Bear Mountain; Bronxville (Westchester Co.); Buffalo (Erie Co.); Callicoon (Sullivan Co.); Catskill
(Greene Co.); Chatham (Columbia Co.); Cranberry Lake (Saint Lawrence Co.); Florida (Orange Co.); Gpshen (Orange
Co.); Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); Kissing L. , L. I.; McLean Bogs (Tompkins Co.); New Rochelle (Westchester Co.);
New York City; N. Fairhaven; Ocean Beach, Fire Island (Suffolk Co.); Olcott (Niagara Co.); Oswego (Oswego Co.);
Peekskill (Westchester Co.); Pike Wyoming Co.); Ringwood Reserve, Dryden (Tompkins Co.); Sea Cliff (Nassau Co.);
Wayne Co. ; West Point (Orange Co.); W. Hebron; White Lake (Sullivan Co.); Wildwood State Park (Suffolk Co. ) .
NORTH CAROLINA - Black Mountains; Clayton (Johnston Co.); Faison (Duplin Co.); Laurel Springs, Upper Mountain
Research Station (Alleghany Co. ) ; Raleigh (Wake Co.). NORTH DAKOTA - Trail Co. OHIO - Ashtabula (Ashtabula
Co.); Athens (Athens Co.); Bedford (Cuyahoga Co.); Cincinnati (Hamilton Co.); Columbus (Franklin Co.); Flat Rock
Creek, Benton Twp. (Holmes Co.); Georgesville; Grove City; Holmesville (Holmes Co.); Jefferson (Ashtabula Co.);
Lockbourne (Franklin Co.); Lucas Co.; Mendon (Mercer Co.); Ottawa (Putnam Co.); Oxford (Butler Co.); Paulding
Co.; Put-in- Bay; Rock Creek (Ashtabula Co. ); S. Bass Island (Ottawa Co. ); Springfield (Clark Co. ) . OKLAHOMA -
Norman (Cleveland Co. ) . PENNSYLVANIA - Bethlehem (Northampton Co. ) ; Columbia Cross Roads (Bradford Co. );
Delaware Water Gap (Monroe Co.); Easton (Northampton Co.); Mt. Airy; Ohiopyle (Fayette Co.); Philadelphia (Phil-
adelphia Co.); Pittsburgh (Allegheny Co.); Tinicum (Bucks Co.); West Chester (Chester Co.). RHODE ISLAND -
Block Island (Newport Co.); Warwick (Kent Co.); Watchhill (Washington Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Beaufort Co. ;
Blackville (Barnwell Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.). TENNESSEE - Elmwood (SmithCo.); Green Brier (Robertson Co.);
Knoxville (Knox Co.). TEXAS - Abilene (Taylor Co.); Carthage (Panola Co.); Columbus (Colorado Co. ) ; Dalhart,
Rita Blanca Lake (Dallam Co.); Tyler (Smith Co.). VIRGINIA - Blacksburg (Montgomery Co.); Falls Church (Fairfax
Co.); Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.); Richmond (Henrico Co.); Warm Springs (Bath Co.). WEST VIRGINIA -
Fairmont (Marion Co.); Salem (Harrison Co. ) ; Sistersville (Tyler Co.); White Sulphur Springs (Greenbrier Co. ) .
WISCONSIN - Bayfield (Bayfield Co.); Brodhead (Green Co.); Madison (Dane Co.); Platteville (Grant Co.).
2. Lebia (Loxopeza) atriceps LeConte
Lebia atriceps LeConte 1863a : 5. Type locality - Nebraska. Gemminger
and Harold 1868 : 136. Leng 1920 : 65 (Loxopeza) , Csiki 1932 :
1316 (Loxopeza). Blackwelder 1944 : 53.
Loxopeza atriceps ; Chaudoir 1870 : 143. Horn 1872 : 132. Casey 1920 :
238.
Loxopeza nanulina Casey 1920 : 238. Type locality - Colorado (Boulder Co.).
NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia nanulina ; Csiki 1932 : 1317 (Loxopeza).
Description'
Length of elytra - 3.67-5. 50 mm; mean (25 specimens) 4.49 rnm.
Head - Frons, vertex, and genae dark (frons usually black), cly-
peus pale; microsculpture of frons distinct. Mouth parts pale except
dark palpi. Antennae with basal three and a third segments pale, others
usually dark or infuscated but becoming paler apically.
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually blue); epipleura dark. Disc with
156
Revision of Lebia
intervals weakly to moderately convex.
Legs - Trochanters and femora pale; tibiae infuscated; tarsi
dark; fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male Genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in fig. 52 (note that the
sixth group of spines is formed from short spines arranged to form a
transverse rectangle or square and that the seventh group is lacking).
The endophallic armature in nine specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - North of Mexico there ar e only two black headed
species of the subgenus Loxopc2a : afrAeps and tricolor. The two are allo-
patric and differ in the color of their palpi and antennae (dark in atriceps ,
pale in tricolor .
Variation - Antennal segments four to eleven are sometimes as
pale as the basal segments, the elytral disc is occasionally greenish in-
stead of blue, and the elytral intervals are sometimes moderately con-
vex.
Synonymy _ Casey's Loxopeza nanulina is here considered a synonym
of atriceps as it differs only in size and other minor features. It occurs
within the range of atriceps .
Distribution - Lebia atriceps occurs from the Canadian prairies south
to Arizona, New Mexico and western Texas (fig. 141). Over 400 speci-
mens were studied from the following localities.
CANADA
ALBERTA - Cypress Hills; Edmonton; Lethbridge; Medicine Hat; Tilley. MANITOBA - Aweme. SASKATCHEWAN -
Saskatoon; Swift Current; Val Marie.
UNITED STATES
ARIZONA - Arivaca (Pima Co.); Bar Foot Park, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.); Brown's Canyon, Baboquivari
Mountains (Pima Co.); Calabasas Picnic Grounds, Ruby Road (Santa Cruz Co.); Canelo (Santa Cruz Co.); Cave Creek
Ranch, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.); Dragoon (Cochise Co.); Fairbank (Cochise Co.); Fort Grant (Graham
Co. ) ; Fort Huachuca (Cochise Co. ) ; Hereford, Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); McNary (Apache Co.);
MormonLake (Coconino Co .) ; Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Pata-
gonia Mountains; Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Portal (Cochise Co.); Prescott (Yavapai Co.); Ramsey Canyon,
Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Ruby (Santa Cruz Co.); Santa Rita Mountains; Southwest Research Station, Portal
(Cochise Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Turkey Flat, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.);
White Mountains (Gile Co.); Winslow (Navajo Co.). COLORADO - Boulder (Boulder Co.); Cheyenne Mountains Museum
(El Paso Co.); Colorado Springs (El Paso Co.); Conejos Co.; Denver (Denver Co.); Fort Collins (Larimer Co.);
Pueblo (Pueblo Co.). IDAHO - Caldwell (Canyon Co.); Indian Cove (Owynee Co.); Mountain Home (Elmore Co.).
KANSAS. MONTANA - Bozeman (Gallatin Co. ) ; Crow Agency (Big Horn Co.). NEBRASKA- Glen (Sioux Co.); Mitchell
(Scotts Bluff Co.). NEVADA - Go Shu'.e Valley (White Pine Co.). NEW MEXICO - Bernalillo (Sandoval Co.); Coolidge
(McKinley Co. ) ; Hot Springs, Las Vegas (San Miguel Co .) ; lemez Mountains; Mescalero Indian Reservation (Otero
Co.). NORTH DAKOTA- Sentinel Butte (Golden Valley Co.). SOUTH DAKOTA - Hot Springs (Fall River Co. ) . TEXAS -
Davis Mountains; Fort Davis ( leff Davis Co. ) . UTAH - Farmington (Davis Co. ) .
3. Lebia (Loxopeza) tricolor Say
Lebia tricolor Say 1825 : 11. Type locality - "Pennsylvania . . . also on the
Missouri". Dejean 1826 : 453. LeConte 1848 : 192. LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 141. Blatchley 1910 :
144. Leng 1920 ; 65 {Loxopeza). Csiki 1932 : 1317 {Loxopeza).
Loxopeza tricolor I Chaudoir 1870 : 140. Horn 1872 : 131. Casey 1920 :
235.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 72-5. 76 mm; mean (20 specimens) 4.71mm.
Head - Frons, vertex and genae dark (frons usually black), cly-
peus pale; microsculpture of frons usually distinct. Mouth parts pale.
Antennae entirely pale.
Madge
157
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually shiny green); epipleura dark.
Disc with intervals moderately convex.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 43 (note that the
first group of spines is very poorly developed, the sixth group is a loose
cluster of short broad spines, and that an eighth group is present). The
endophallic armature in five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - See under atriceps .
Variation - There appears to be no marked variation in tricolor .
Distribution - Lcbia tricolor occurs in the eastern United States and
adjacent Canada (fig. 126). Over 150 specimens were studied from the
following localities.
CANADA
ONTARIO - Ottawa; Prince Edward Co. ; Roseland; Toronto; Trenton. QUEBEC - Covey Hill; Montreal; Norway
Bay; Perkins Mills; Sherbrooke.
UNITED STATES
CONNECTICUT - Canaan (Litchfield Co.); Cornwall (Litchfield Co.); Litchfield (Litchfield Co.). DISTRICT OF COL-
UMBIA. FLORIDA - Levy Co. ; Marion Co. ; Tampa (Hillsborough Co. ). ILLINOIS - Chicago (Cook Co. ). INDIANA -
Bartholomew Co.; Gary (Lake Co.). KANSAS. LOUISIANA - Hart; New Iberia (Iberia Co.). MASSACHUSETTS -
A rlington (Middlesex Co. ) ; Boston (Suffolk Co. ) ; Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Salisbury (EssexCo.); Springfield (Hampden
Co.). MICHIGAN - Cheboygan Co. ; Detroit ( Wayne Co .) ; Marquette (Marquette Co. ) ; Washtenaw Co. ; Whitefish Point
(Chippewa Co. ). MINNESOTA - Two Harbors ( Lake Co. ) . NEW HAMPSHIRE - Franconia (Grafton Co. ) ; Mount Wash-
ington (Coos Co.); Rumney (Grafton Co.). NEW JERSEY - Arlington (Hudson Co.); Hillsdale (BergenCo.); Lake Hopat-
cong; Manasquan (Monmouth Co.); Mountain Lakes (Morris Co.); Woodbury (Gloucester Co.). NEW YORK - Asps
Hill, L.l ; Bear Mountain (Rockland Co. ); Buffalo (Erie Co. ); Catskill Mt. , (Ulster Co. ); Dryden (Tompkins Co. );
Irving (Chautaugua Co. ) ; Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); Kingston (Ulster Co.); Lancaster (Erie Co. ) ; Lyons ( Wayne Co .) ;
Mount Whiteface (Essex Co. ) ; New Rochelle ( Westchester Co. ) ; New York City; Olcott (Niagara Co. ) ; Phoenicia (U Ister
Co. ); White Plains (Westchester Co. ). NORTH CAROLINA - Lake Junaluska (Haywood Co. ). PENNSYLVANIA - Arendts-
ville (Adams Co.); Milford (Pike Co.); Nanticoke ( Luze rne Co.); PhilacTelphia (Philadelphia Co. ) ; State College (Centre
Co.); The Rock. RHODE ISLAND - Warwick (Kent Co. ) . TEXAS. VIRGINIA - Mount Vernon (Fairfax Co. ) ; Rosslyn
(Arlington Co.). WEST VIRGINIA - White Sulphur Springs (GreenbrierCo. ). WISCONSIN - Milwaukee (Milwaukee Co. ) .
4. Lebia (Loxopeza) subdola new species
llolotype _ A male labelled as follows: Madera Cn, Sta. Rita Mts. , Sta.
Cruz Co. Ariz. VIII 3.60, 5000' - 5800' G. E. Ball family and
R. B. Madge collectors. To be deposited in the Canadian Nat-
ional Collection, Ottawa.
Paratypes are from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co, ) (one male, California Academy of Sciences); Cave Creek,
Chi ricahua Mountains (Cochi se Co. ) (one female , California Academy of Sciences); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiricahua Moun-
tains (Cochise Co.) (three females, personal collection of G.E. Ball, University of Alberta); Chiricahua Mountains
(Cochise Co.) (one female, California Academy of Sciences; one female. United States National Museum); Huachuca
Mountains (Cochise Co. ) (one male California Academy of Sciences); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa Cruz
Co.) (two females, personal collection of G.E, Ball, U niversity of Alberta ; two males and one female, Cornell Univer-
sity); Mount Washington, Nogales (Santa Cruz Co. ) (two females, California Academy of Sciences); Palmerlee (Cochise
Co.) (one male. Museum of Comparative Zoology); Pinery Canyon, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.) (one male,
American Museum of Natural History; one male, Canadian National Collection); Southwest Research Station, Portal
(Cochise Co.) (three males and three females, American Museum of Natural History; one male, Canadian National
Collection); Turkey Flat. Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.) (one male, California Academy of Sciences); White
Mountains (one male. Museum of Comparative Zoology) . TEXAS - Big Bend National Park (Brewster Co. ) (two females ,
personal collection of G. E. Ball, University of Alberta).
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 80 - 4. 68 mm; mean (22 specimens) 4. 21 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale; microsculpture of
frons usually lacking. Mouth parts pale. Antennae entirely pale. Neck
not suddenly constricted behind eyes.
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually bright blue); epipleura usually
dark. Disc with intervals weakly convex.
158
Revision of Lebia
Wings - The sclerotized patch just distad of vein SA^ weakly con-
vex (fig. 15).
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 54 (note that the
first group of spines is small and poorly developed, the sixth group is
formed of short broad spines in a loose cluster, and the seventh is cres-
cent-shaped and lying between the sixth and first groups). The endo-
phallic armature in seven specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition^ This small Loxopeza is most likely to be confused with.
small specimens of suhgrandis , However, the two can usually be distin-
guished by the lack of microsculpture on the frons of suhdola. In addition
the small sclerotized patch in the anal region of the wing is shaped dif-
ferently in the two (weakly convexin suhdola ^ strongly convex in subgrandis,
figs. 14, 15).
Variation - In a few specimens the microsculpture of the frons is
more or less distinct. Otherwise there appears to be no major varia-
tion in suhdola .
Etymology- The name is derived from the Latin adjective subdolus -
subtle, deceiving - in reference to it being confused with Lebia subgrandis .
Distribution- This species is known only from southern Arizona and
western Texas; 29 specimens (type material) were studied.
5. Lebia (Loxopeza) deceptrix new species
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Pena Blanca, Santa Cruz Co. Ariz.
4000' August 11, i960 at light G. E. Ball familyand R.B. Madge.
To be deposited in the Canadian National Collection, Ottawa.
Paratypes are from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Bear Valley, Tumacacori Mountain (Santa Cruz Co.) (one female, Museum of Comparative Zoology) ; Canelo
(Santa Cruz Co.) (two males and one female. University of Arizona); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise
Co.) (two females, personal collection of G. E. Ball, University of Alberta); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains
(Santa Cruz Co.) (three males, personal collection of G. E Ball); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.) (four males and six
females, personal collection of G. E. Ball): Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co.) (one female, American
Museum of Natural History). TEXAS - Davis Mountains (Jeff Davis Co.) (one male, California Academy of Sciences).
Description
Length of elytra^ 6. 13 - 7. 33 mm; mean (22 specimens) 6. 56 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale; microsculpture of
frons usually distinct. Antennae entirely pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually bright blue) ; epipleura dark. Disc
with intervals weakly to moderately convex.
Wings - The sclerotized patch just distad of vein 3A£ weakly con-
vex (fig. 15).
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 55 (note that the
first group of spines is small, and that the second, sixth and seventh
groups are not separate from each other). The endophallic armature in
five specimens was examined.
Madge
159
Discussion
Recognition - Lebia deceptrix may be confused with large specimens of
subgrandis and any specimens of grandis from western Texas. From both
it can usually be recognized by the smaller, less arched sclerotized
patch in the anal region of its wing. Positive identification is best ob-
tained from the endophallic armature of the male.
Variation - In the small series of deceptrix available variation in the
microsculpture of the frons and the color of the elytral disc was noticed.
Usually the microsculpture is present but occasionally it is reduced or
lacking as in specimens of subdola. The elytral disc is typically bright
blue, rarely with a greenish tinge.
Etymology- The name is derived from the Latin noun deceptrix -
she that deceives - in reference to the similarity of this species toother
Loxopeza , especially grandis .
Distribution - North of Mexico Lebia deceptrix is known from southern
Arizona and western Texas; 22 specimens (type material) were studied.
6. Lebia (Loxopeza) pimalis (Casey)
Loxopeza pimalis Casey 1920 : 237. Type locality - Arizona.
Lebis pimalis I Csiki 1932 : 1317 {Loxopeza).
Description
Length of elytra - 3.80- 5. 40 mm; mean (24 specimens) 4. 60 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale, microsculpture
of frons distinct. Mouth parts pale. Antennae entirely pale.
Elytra « Disc metallic (usually a dull dark green); epipleura var-
ying from dark to pale. Disc with intervals strongly convex.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 56 (note that the
first group of spines is moderately large, the sixth group consists of
only one or two short spines and the seventh group lies in a fold at the
side of the first group). The endophallic armature in six specimens was
examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Lebia pimalis can be distinguished from our other species
of the subgenus Loxopeza by its very convex elytral intervals . Occasionally
there may be difficulty in separating some of the greenish specimens of
subgrandis in which case it is necessary to check the male genitalia.
Variation - The elytral disc varies in color from the usual dull
green to sometimes almost black while the epipleura vary from pale to
dark. Most specimens have the epipleura pale or partially so.
Distribution - Lebia pimalis is known north of Mexico only in southern
Arizona. Over 175 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
ARIZONA - Brown's Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Canelo (Santa Cruz Co.); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiri-
cahua Mountains (Cochi se Co. ) ; Coyote Mountains; Douglas (Cochise Co.); Dragoon (Cochise Co.); El Mirador Ranch,
Sasabe, Baboquivari Mountains (PimaCo.); Fort Grant (GrahamCo.); Kits Peak Rincon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima
Co.); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Montezuma Pass, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.);
Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz
Co.); Ruby (Santa Cruz Co.); Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains (Pima Co.); Sierritas; Sonoita (Santa Cruz
Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co. ) ; Tombstone (Cochise Co. ) ; Tucson (Pima Co. ) .
160
Revision of Lebia
7. Lebia (Loxopeza) subgrandis new species
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Pena Blanca, Santa Cruz Co.
Ariz. 4000' August 11, I960 at light G. E. Ball family and R. B.
Madge collectors. To be deposited in the Canadian National
Collection, Ottawa.
Paratypes are from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Brown's Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.) (three inales and one female. Museum of Comparative
Zoology); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.) (one male and three females, personal collection of G. E. Ball, University of
Alberta): San Bernardino (Cochise Co.) (two males and one female. University of Arizona); Tucson (Pima Co.) (one
male and three females, California Academy of Sciences); Tucson Mountains, Desert Museum (Pima Co.) (one male
and one female. University of Arizona).
Description
Length of elytra - 4. 25 - 6. 25 mm; mean (22 specimens) 5. 22 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale; microsculpture
of frons distinct. Mouth parts pale. Antennae entirely pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic (blue or green); epipleura varying from
dark to pale. Disc with intervals usually moderately convex.
V^ings- The sclerotized patch justdistadof vein 3A2 strongly con-
vex (fig. 14).
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Male genitalia ^ Armature of endophallus as in fig. 57 (note that the
first group of spines is moderately large, the third group is small, the
sixth group is formed of a dense group of long narrow spines and the
seventh group lies in a fold at the side of the first group). The endo-
phallic armature in 11 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - There are three other species of the subgenus Loxopeza
with pale heads which are sympatric with subgrandis north of Mexico:
pimalis, subdola, and dccepfnx . In addition, the range o£ grandis may over-
lap that of subgrandis in western Texas. In this area these two can be re-
liably separated only on the basis of differences in the endophallic ar-
mature. Separation of subgrandis from the other three species is best
done on the basis of the endophallic armature although there are some
external character s which can be used. The elytral intervals are not as
strongly convex in subgrandis as in pimalis and the two can usually be se-
parated on the basis of this character. The small sclerotized patch in
the anal region of the wing is usually more convex in subgrandis than in
deceptrix and subdo/a and this usually permits recognition. In addition, the
microsculpture of the frons is distinct in subgrandis and usually lacking in
subdola .
Variation - In addition to the considerable variation in size the
elytral disc varies from blue to green and the epipleura from dark to
pale. In a few specimens the elytral intervals are more strongly con-
vex and approach the condition found inpimalis.
Relationships - Lebia subgrandis is very closely related to grandis. The
two are largely allopatric but may overlap in western Texas. Because
the endophallic armatures are quite distinct where the two at least ap-
proach each other in Texas the two forms are regarded as distinct spec-
ies. The fact that the third group of spines in the endophallic armature
Madge
161
of grandis becomes smaller in northern specimens and thus approaches the
condition found in suhgrandis has no bearing on the question as the two are
then separated by hundreds of miles.
Etymology - The specific name is derived from the Latin prefix
sub _ a being, situated under and hence a being concealed behind some-
thing - and grandis in reference to it being confused with the closely re-
lated Lebia grandis .
Distribution - Lebia sub grandis occurs from western Texas to southern
Arizona. Over 250 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
ARIZONA - Arivaipa (Graham Co. ) ; Bear Valley, Tumacacori Mountains (Santa C ruz Co.); Brown's Canyon, Baboquivari
Mountains (PimaCo.); Canelo (Santa Cruz Co.); Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Cave Creek Ranch,
Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.); Charleston (Cochise Co.); Cochise Stronghold, Dragoon Mountains (Cpchise Co.);
Cutter (Gila Co. ) ; F air bank (Cochise Co.); Fort Huachuca (Cochi se Co. ) ; Globe (Gila Co. ) ; Kits Peak Rincon, Babo-
quivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.);
Oracle (Pinal Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Patagonia Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.);
Pearce (Cochise Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Portal (Cochise Co.); Prescott (Yavapai Co.); Rice; Ruby
(Santa Cruz Co.); Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains (Pima Co.); San Bernardino (Cochise Co.); Southwest
Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co.); Sunnyside Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon
Mountains (Cochise Co.); Tucson (Pima Co.); Tucson Mountains (Pima Co.). CALIFORNIA. NEW MEXICO - Deming
(Luna Co.); Double Adobe Ranch, Animas Mountains (Hidalgo Co.). TEXAS - Alpine (Brewster Co.); Limpia Creek
Canyon, Davis Mountains (Jeff Davis Co.).
8. Lebia (Loxops ea) grandis Hentz
Lebia grandis Hentz 1830 : 258. Type locality - North Carolina. LeConte
1848 : 192. LeConte 1865 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
139. Blatchley 1910:144. Leng 1920:65 (Loxopeza), Csiki 1932 :
1316 {Loxopeza) . Blackwelder 1944 : 54.
Loxopeza grandis ; Chaudoir 1870: 139. Horn 1872 : 131. Casey 1920: 235.
Loxopeza majuscula Chaudoir 1870 : 141. Type locality - Texas. NEW SY-
NONYMY. Horn 1872 : 131. Casey 1920 : 236.
Lebia majuscula I Leng 1920 : 65 {Loxopeza). Csiki 1932 : 1317 {Loxopeza).
Blackwelder 1944 : 54.
Loxopeza grandis rivularis Casey 1920 : 235. Type locality - Texas (Browns-
ville). NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia grandis rivularis ; Csiki 1932 : 1317 {Loxopeza),
Loxopeza magi ster Casey 1920 : 236. Type locality - Lake Superior (Mar -
quette). NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia magi ster ‘ Csiki 1932 : 1317 {Loxopeza).
Description
Length of elytra - 4. 92 - 7. 42 mm; mean (25 specimens) 6. 28 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale; microsculpture
of frons usually distinct. Mouth parts pale. Antennae entirely pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic (usually blue); epipleura dark. Disc with
intervals moderately convex.
Wings - The sclerotized patch justdistadof vein 3A2 strongly con-
vex (fig. 14) .
^ Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus variable,
bilobed or emarginate.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 58 (note that the
first group of spines is large, the third group is moderately large, the
sixth group is made up of a dense cluster of narrow spines and the sev-
enth lies to the side of the first and in a groove). The endophallic ar-
162
Revision of Lebia
mature in 15 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Over most of its range grandis can be confused only
with atriventris which is smaller, has flatter elytral intervals, and has
the palpi dark. As there is the possibility that grandis occurs in western
Texas, it could be confused with subgrandis , deceptrix , or possibly subdola ,
The most reliable structure for the identification of these is the endo-
phallic armature of the male genitalia. In addition, deceptrix and subdola
can be recognized by the small size of the sclerotized patch just distad
of the apex of vein 3A2 (fig. 15). Also, subdola is smaller, usually lacks
microsculpture on the frons, and the head is gradually constricted be-
hind the eyes to the neck. Females of subgrandis cannot be separated from
grandis .
Variation - Ix). grandis variation occur s in the structure of the fourth
segment of the hind tarsus and the size of the third group of spines on
the endophallus of the male. Northern specimens sometimes have the
fourth segment bilobed but usually only more strongly emarginate than
in southern specimens. The endophallic spines of the third group are
often smaller in the more northern specimens. Typically grandis has the
elytral disc metallic blue but inmanyof the southern specimens (espec-
ially from Texas) the disc is green.
Synonymy - Loxopeza majuscula Chaudoir has been placed here as a
synonym although, since no definite locality in Texas was given for the
species, it could also be a representative of subgrandis , deceptrix , or even
subdola. However, since these latter three occur only in western Texas
it is more likely that majuscula belongs to the wider ranging (in Texas)
grandis. Casey's magister is based on a character (the roundness of the
outer apical corner of the elytra) considered of no value.
Distribution - Lebia grandis occMrs in the eastern United States and ad-
jacent Canada. In Texas it definitely occurs as far west as Sanderson
and possibly farther (fig. 137). The record from the Davis Mountains is
based on a female and is thus questionable. Over 1000 specimens were
studied from the following localities.
CANADA
ONTARIO - Port Colbouren; Port Hope; Preston; Simcoe; Toronto? ■ Trenton.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Bessemer (Jefferson Co.); Birmingham (Jefferson Co.); Blount Mountains; Oxford (Calhoun' Co. ) ; Tus-
caloosa (Tuscaloosa Co.). ARKANSAS - Hope (Hempstead Co.); Imboden (Lawrence Co.). CONNECTICUT - Canaan,
Cornwall (Litchfield Co. ) ; New Haven (New Haven Co. ) ; Stamford (Fairfield Co. ) . DELAWARE - Newark (New Castle
Co.), DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. GEORGIA - Atlanta (Fulton Co.); Clarke Co. ; Head River (Dade Co.). ILLINOIS -
Beverley Hills; Bowmanville; Chicago (Cook Co.); Edgebrook (Cook Co.); Galena (Jo Davies Co.); Glendon Park;
La Grange (Cook Co.); LaSalle Co.; Lyons (Cook Co.); Monee (Will Co.); Oakwood (Vermilion Co. ) ; Palos Park
(Cook Co.); Riverside (Cook Co.); U rbana (Champaign Co.); Willow Springs (Cook Co.). INDIANA - Brown Co.;
Floyd Co.; Gary (Lake Co.); Gibson Co.; Hammond (Lake Co.); Knox Co.; Lagrange Co.; Long Lake; Mineral
Springs; Posey Co. ; Vigo Co. IOWA - Corydon (Wayne Co.); Fort Madison (Lee Co.); Herrold (Polk Co.); Iowa
City (Johnson Co.); Mount Pleasant (Henry Co.); Sioiix City (Woodbury Co.); Wauponsie State Park (Fremont Co.).
KANSAS - Ellsworth Co. ; Garden City (Finney Co. ) ; Gove Co. ; Hays (Ellis Co. ) ; Kiowa Co. ; Lawrence (Douglas Co. ) ;
Logan Co.; Manhattan (Riley Co.); McPherson (McPherson Co.); Meade Co. ; Mount Hope (Sedgwick Co.); Nickerson
(Reno Co.); Onago (Pottawatomie Co.); Russel Co.; Scott Co.; Topeka (Shawnee Co.); Wellington (Sumner Co,).
KENTUCKY - Lexington (Fayette Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City); Catonsville (Baltimore Co.);
Crisfield (Somerset Co. ) ; Forest Glen (Montgomery Co. ) ; Hagerstown (Washington Co. ) ; Sparrows Point (Baltimore Co. ) .
MASSACHUSETTS - Amherst (Hampshire Co.); Arlington (Middlesex Co.); Boston (Suffolk Co.); Brookline (Norfolk
Co.); Framingham (Middlesex Co.); Lawrence (Essex Co.); Marion (Plymouth Co.); Melrose Highlands (Middlesex
Co.); Milton (Norfolk Co. ) ; Mount Toby; Northfield (Franklin Co.); Sherborn (Middlesex Co.); Wellesley (Norfolk
Co.). MICHIGAN - Ann Arbor (Washtenav/ Co. ) ; Detroit (Wayne Co.); East Lansing (Ingham Co.); E. K. WarrenPre-
serve (Barrien Co. ) ; Grand Ledge (Eaton Co. ) ; Oakland Co. ; Palmer Woods (Wayne Co. ) ; Pentwater (Oceana Co, ) ;
Port Huron (Saint Clair Co.); Saugatuck (Allegan Co.); Southfield (Oakland Co.). MINNESOTA - Dakota (Winona Lo.);
Hennepin Co. ; Ramsey Co, ; Saint Anthony Park; Saint Peter (Nicollet Co. ) . MISSOURI - Charleston (Mis sissippi Co. ) ;
Kimswick (Jefferson Co. ) ; Saint Joseph (Buchanan Co. ) ; Saint Louis ( ndependent City) ; Willard (Greene Co. ) ; Williams-
Madge
163
ville (Wayne Co.)- NEBRASKA - Lincoln (Lancaster Co.); Omaha (Douglas Co.). NEW JERSEY - Anglesea; Atco
(CamdenCo.); Atlantic City (Atlantic Co. ) ; Boonton (Morris Co. ) ; Bridgeboro (Burlington Co. ) ; Chester (Morris Co. ) ;
Cumberland Co. ; Dayton (Middlesex Co. ) ; Elizabeth (Union Co. ) ; Fort Lee (Bergen Co. ) ; Hackensack (Bergen Co .) ;
Lakehurst (Ocean Co.); Long Beach (Mdnmouth Co.); Manahawkin (OceanCo.); Manasquan (Monmouth Co.); Montclair
(EssexCo.); Newark (Essex Co. ) ; New Brunswick (Middlesex Co. ) ; Nutley (Essex Co. ) ; Orange (Essex Co. ) ; Passaic
Junction; Paterson (Passaic Co. ) ; Point Pleasant (Ocean Co. ) ; Rahway (Union Co. ) ; Pamsey (Bergen Co. ) ; Piverton
(Burlington Co.); Snake Hill; South Orange (Essex Co.); Westville (Gloucester Co.). NEW YORK - Albany (Albany
Co.); Ashokan (Ulster Co.); Bear Mountain (P ockland Co.); Buffalo (Erie Co.); Centereach; Cold Spring Harbor
(Suffolk Co. ) ; Hamburg (Erie Co.); Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); Long Beach (Nassau Co.); McLean Bogs (Tompkins Co.);
New York City; North Collins (Erie Co. ) ; Ocean Beach, Fire Island (Suffolk Co. ) ; Olcott (Niagara Co. ) ; Onondaga Co. ;
Orient (Suffolk Co. ) ; Ossining (Westchester Co. ) ; Peekskill (Westchester Co. ) ; Pike (Wyoming Co. ) ; Pichmond, L. I. ;
Roslyn (Nassau Co. ) ; Smithtown (Suffolk Co. ) ; South Huntington (Suffolk Co. ) ; Tuxedo Park (Orange Co. ) ; Wappingers
Falls (Dutchess Co.); West Nyack (P ockland Co.); West Point (Orange Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Asheville (Buncome
Co.); Black Mountain (Buncombe Co.); Black Mountains ; Clayton (Johnston Co. ) ; Columbus Co.; Elizabeth City (Pas-
quotank Co..) ; Faison (Duplin Co. ) ; Henderson (Vance Co. ) ; Hot Springs (Madison Co. ) ; Lake Junaluska (Haywood Co. ) ;
Marion (McDowell Co. ) ; Mills Piver; Overhills (Harnett Co.); Oxford (Granville Co.); Paleigh (Wake Co.); Sunburst.
OHIO - Berea (Cuyahoga Co. ) ; Cedar Point (Erie Co. ) ; Champaign Co. ; Cincinnati (Hamilton Co. ) ; Columbus (Franklin
Co.); Conneaut (Ashtabula Co.); Dayton (Montgomery Co.); Holmesville (Holmes Co.); Hudson (Summit Co.); Lock-
bourne (Franklin Co. ) ; Lucas Co. ; Marion (Marion Co. ) ; Newark (Licking Co. ) . OKLAHOMA - Durant (Bryan Co. ) ;
Grady Co.; Kenton (Cimarron Co.); Lawton (Comanche Co. ) ; Mangum (Greer Co.); Tulsa (Tulsa Co.); Waynoka
(Woods Co.); Woodward (Woodward Co.). PENNSYLVANIA - Abington (Montgomery Co.); Allentown (Lehigh Co.);
Ashbourne; Bethlehem (Northampton Co. ) ; CampHill (Cumberland Co. ) ; Collingdale (Delaware Co.); Delaware Water
Gap (Monroe Co.); Easton (Northampton Co .) ; Fairview (Erie Co. ) ; Grove City (Mercer Co. ) ; Harrisburg (Dauphin
Co.); Homebrook; Hummelstown (Dauphin Co. ) ; Lebanon (Lebanon Co. ) ; Lehigh Gap; Mount Moriah; Philadelphia
(Philadelphia Co.); Trevose (Bucks Co.); Vella Novo (Montgomery Co. ) ; Wall (Allegheny Co.); Wyoming (Luzerne
Co.). RHODE ISLAND - Providence (Providence Co.); Warwick (Kent Co.); Watch Hill (Washington Co.). SOUTH
CAROLINA - Beaufort Co. ; Blackville (Barnwell Co.); Camden (Kershaw Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.). SOUTH DAK-
OTA - Volga (Brookings Co.). TENNESSEE - Dyer Co.; Knoxville (Knox Co.); Nashville (Davidson Co. ) . TEXAS -
Abilene (Taylor Co. ); Austin (Travis Co. ); Brazos River; Brownsville (Cameron Co. ); Burnet (Burnet Co. ); Calvert
(Robertson Co.); College Station (Brazos Co.); Cypress Mill (Blanco Co.); Dallas (Dallas Co.); Del Rio (Val Verde
Co.); Edinburg (Hidalgo Co. ) ; Fedor; Fort Davis ( leff Davis Co. ) ; Kingsville (Kleberg Co. ) ; McKinney (Collin Co .) ;
Mission (Hidalgo Co.); New Braunfels (Comal Co.); Sabinal (Uvalde Co.); Sabine Pass (Jefferson Co.); Salado (Bell
Co.); Sanderson (Terrell Co. ) ; Seguin (Guadalupe Co. ) ; Tyler (Smith Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.); Wharton (Wharton
Co.); Wichita Falls (Wichita Co. ) . VIRGINIA - Arlington (Arlington Co. ) ; Blacksburg (Montgomery Co. ) ; CapeCharles
(Northampton Co. ) ; Falls Church (Fai rfax Co. ) ; Nelson Co. ; Pichmond (I'enrico Co. ) . WISCONSIN - Baraboo (Sauk
Co.); Cranmoor.
Subgenus Polycheloma new subgenus
Type species - Lebia testacea LeConte (= Lebia lecontei Madge)
Description
Head - Mentum without epilobes, with a tooth; ligula with para-
glossae extending slightly beyond glossae; neck rather stout (fig. 4).
Legs _ Protibia with an upper spur. Mesotibiae of males with
several preapical notches.
Other features of this subgenus as it occurs north of Mexico are
given in the description of Lebia lecontei .
Discussion
Recognition - This subgenus can be distinguished from the other
subgenera occurring north of Mexico by the following characteristics:
upper protibial spur present; and elytra entirely pale.
Notes- Although Lebia lecontei is subgenerically distinct from the
other subgenera of Lebia occurring north of Mexico, possibly it belongs
to one of the Neotropical genera described by Chaudoir, especially
Poecilostola . However, most of the characters used here to distinguish
Polycheloma were not used by Chaudoir in the description of Poecilostola so
it is difficult to compare the two. Until such time as the species of
Poecilostola can be studied the name proposed here will serve for the sub-
generic placement of Lebia lecontei.
Etymology - The name is derived from the Greek ttoAus - many,
XnAcoya - notch - in reference to the several preapical notches found on
the mesotibiae of the males. The name is neuter.
164
Revision of Lebia
9. Lebia (Polycheloma) lecontei new name
Loxopeza testacea L,eC out e (not Dejean 1831) 1880 : 164. Type locality -
T exas .
Lebia testacea; Deng 1920 : 65 (Loxopeza). Csiki 1932 : 1317 (Loxopeza),
Blackwelder 1944 : 56.
Description
Length of elytra - 3.80-4.56 mm; mean (14 specimens) 4.26 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus and genae pale (usually reddish
brown); frons with fine, rather indistinct microsculpture, scattered fine
punctures, and fine wrinkles. Mouth parts pale; mentum with a tooth.
Antennae entirely pale.
Prothorax - Entirely pale (usually reddish brown) , lateral margins
of pronotum palest. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins
widened basally; disc with distinct microsculpture and confused wrin-
kles. Episternum with horizontal wrinkles at the center.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Entirely pale (usually reddish brown) sometimes slightly
infuscated apically; epipleura pale. Elytral disc with striae distinct,
intervals moderately convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge
usually complete.
Wings- Oblongum cell absent.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale (usually reddish brown).
Male genitalia - Endophallus unarmed; apex of median lobe tapered
to a broad point. The endophallic armature in two specimens was exa-
mined.
Discussion
Recognition - This is our only more or less entirely pale species
in which the upper protibial spur is present.
Variation - In the few males seen of this species the number of pre-
apical notches on the mesotibiae varies from 2 to 3, even in the same
individual.
Synonymy - This species was originally described by LeConte as
Loxopeza testacea . However, this name is a secondary junior homonym of
Lebia testacea Dejean and must be replaced. Lebia testacea Dejean is now gen-
erally placed in the genus Lia which I consider a subgenus of Lebia .
Etymology - The replacement name proposed here is in honor of
the original describer. Dr. John L. LeConte.
Distribution - Although 14 specimens of this species were available
for study only one had a definite locality. This was 2. 5 m east of Nickle
Creek Stn. , Culberson Co.; Texas. All the others were from Texas
with no specific locality.
Subgenus Lamprias Bonelli
Lamprias Bonelli 1809. Type species - Carabus cyanocephalus Linnaeus 1758,
designated by Curtis 1829.
Echimuthus Leach 1815 : 81.
Omalomorpha Motschoulsky 1845 : 42.
Homalops Motschoulsky 1850 ; 42.
Madge
165
Lebida Motschoulsky 1862 : 51.
Description
Head- Variable in color. Frons with variable sculpture, often
strongly punctured, with short erect setae. Mentum with a tooth with a
distinct sulcus across its base, epilobes present; ligula with paraglossae
not extending beyond glossae. Palpi usually stout with the apex trun-
cate; labial palpi with penultimate segment usually bisetose. Antennae
variable in color; basal three and a third segments often hairy. Neck
not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale (inspecies seenin this study), Pronotum
variable in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc with variable
sculpture, often with strong punctures and short erect setae.
Pterothorax ~ Sterna, pleura and scutellum variable in color.
Elytra- Disc usually entirely metallic, sometimes bicolored;
epipleura variable in color. Disc with striae indistinct and broken into
punctures; intervals flat; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge
usually complete.
Wings - Oblongum cell variable in extent of completeness.
Legs - Color variable. Protibia with upper spur present. Meso-
tibia of males with a single preapical notch. Fourth segment of hind
tarsus usually emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium variable in color.
Male genitalia - Median lobe with apex usually tapered to a broad
point. Endophallus (in species seen) armed with longitudinal rows of
fine spines.
Discussion
Recognition- The diagnostic characters of the subgenus Lampnas
are an upper protibial spur, epilobes on the mentum, a tooth on the men-
tum with a distinct sulcus across its base, and (in species seen) strong
punctures and short erect setae on the frons, pronotum, and elytral
disc. In the area under study the subgenus Lamprias can be recognized
by the presence of an upper protibial spur and by the strongly punctured
frons and pronotum.
Taxonomic status - The subgenus Lamprias is clearly a member of the
genus Lebia as defined here. As far as is knovoi it is distinct from other
groups within Lebia and is regarded as a valid subgenus.
Lebia (Lamprias) divisa LeConte
Lebia concinna LeConte (not Brulle 1938) 1848 : 192. Type locality - Lake
Superior.
Lebiadivisa LeConte 1850 : 203. LeConte 1863: 5. Gemminger and Harold
1868 : 138. Horn 1872 : 141. Blatchley 1910 : 145. Leng 1920 :
65 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1314 {Lamprias ).
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 60 - 5. 08 mm; mean (22 specimens) 4. 52 mm.
Head” Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons lacking
microsculpture, with strong setiferous punctures. Mouth parts pale
166
Revision of Lebia
except infuscated palpi; mentum with a tooth. Antennae entirely pale,
first segment lightest. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale. Pronotum shaped as in fig. 5, lateral
margins equal throughout; disc lacking microsculpture, with strong
setiferous punctures,
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc metallic with a pale basal marking (fig. 19); epi-
pleura pale on basal half, dark on distal half. Disc with striae composed
of a series of strong punctures , intervals flat, with scattered punctures,
and with short erect setae at least at the base; apical pinch well dev-
eloped; basal ridge variable, complete or incomplete.
Legs - Pale, tibiae darker distally, tarsi dark. Fourth segment
of hind tarsus strongly emarginate or weakly bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 59, 60; median
lobe with apex shaped as in fig. 61. The endophallic armature in five
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- This is the only species of our fauna with an upper
protibial spur and bicolored elytra. It is also the only species with short
erect setae on the frons, pronotum and base of the elytra.
Variation - In most specimens of Lebia divisa the elytra bear short
setae only at the base. However, in specimens from Illinois and Kansas
there are setae over the entire elytral disc although more numerous at
the base. These specimens also have the tibiae more strongly infuscated.
These variants are considered to belong to a single species because one
of the Illinois specimens shows a definite reduction in the number of
hairs on the elytra. The specimen does not appear to be rubbed. In
addition some of the specimens which typically lack setae except at the
base, show a few very poorly developed setae scattered over the disc.
The two forms, which are allopatric, have the same endophallic arma-
ture. There is little doubt but that specimens from intermediate areas
will show that the two forms completely inter grade.
Distribution - This species occurs over the central part of the con-
tinent (fig. 120); 67 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
CANADA
ALBERTA - Bow Slope; Cassils; Edmonton; Medicine Hat. MANITOBA - Brandon. SASKATCHEWAN - Saskatoon.
UNITED STATES
COLORADO. IDAHO - Lawyers Canyon (Lewis Co. ). ILLINOIS. KANSAS. MINNESOTA - Garrison (Crow Wing Co. ).
Subgeius Lebia Latreille
Lebia Latreille 1802 : 85. Type species - Carabus haemorrhoidalis Fabricius
1792 {= Buprestis marginatus Geoffrey 17 85 - Lebia mar ginata)\ desig-
nated by Andrewes 1935,
Metabola Ch.3Mdoir 1870 : 160. Type species - Metabola rufopyga Chaudoir,
type by monotypy.
Aphe logenia Cha.udoir 1871 : 25. Type species - Carabus vittatus Fabricius;
here designated.
Dianchomena Ch.a.\idoir 1871 ; 45. Type species - Lebia scapular is Dejean (=
Madge
167
Lebis solea Hentz); here designated.
The members of the subgenus Le6/a are extremely varied. Char-
acters mentioned in the generic description as being variable are also
variable in Lebia s.s. except for the following. Mentum always without
epilobes; ligula with paraglossae short and not extending beyond glos-
sae. Penultimate segment of labial palpus bisetose. Wings with ob-
longum cell reduced to a triangular remnant or entirely absent. Protibiae
without an upper spur. Mesotibiae with a single preapical notch. Median
lobe of male genitalia with apex always long, broad or narrow.
Discussion
Recognition - The most diagnostic feature of the subgenus Lebia is
the lack of the upper protibial spur. Other features which are found
throughout the subgenus Lebia can also be found in other subgenera.
Synonymy - Chaudoir's genera Mefa5o/a , Aphelogenia , and Dianchomena
are regarded as synonyms of Lebia . At least one and probably both species
of Metabola are variants of Lebia pulchella . Aphelogenia, characterized by
lack of a tooth on the mentum and the apex of the median lobe narrow,
is clearly connected with the rest of Lebia through Lebia analis and scalpta,
Dianchomena includes several species which are basically members of
Aphelogenia, i. e. they lack the tooth on the mentum and the apex of the
median lobe is narrow. Chaudoir segregated them from Aphelogenia be-
cause of their strongly constricted necks but this character is clearly a
specialization which has arisen twice within Aphelogenia^
11. Lebia (Lebia) pulchella Dejean
Lebia pulehella 1826 : 457. Type locality - "Amerique septentrion-
ale". LeConte 1848 : 194. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and
Harold 1868 : 140. Chaudoir 1870 : 172. Horn 1872 : 133. Blat-
chley 1910 : 145. Casey 1920 : 253. Peng 1920 : 65 {Lebia).
Csiki 1932 : 1330 {Lebia).
Lia pulchella ; Motschoulsky 1864 : 228.
Metabola vivida Bates 1884 : 298. Type locality - Arizona; Mexico, nor-
thern Sonora. NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia vivida '» Horn 1885 : 132. Leng 1920 : 65 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1318
(Metabola). Blackwelder 1944 : 56.
Lebia tahoensis Casey 1920 : 252. Type locality - California (Lake Tahoe).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 ; 1331 (Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 56 - 4. 24 mm; mean (23 specimens) 3. 63 mm.
Head - Frons and vertex metallic blue or green, clypeus and genae
dark; frons and vertex strongly punctured and with short erect hairs.
Mouth parts largely dark, posterior part of gula pale; mentum toothed.
Antennae with basal three segments variable in color, others dark; third
distinctly hairy. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Usually entirely pale, variable in shape (see Table 1).
Lateral margins widened basally; disc with distinct microsculpture but
variable rugosity.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum usually pale, dark if
168
Revision of Lebia
elytral disc is entirely metallic.
Elytra - Disc metallic with pale markings (figs. 20, 21) or en-
tirely metallic blue; epipleura usually pale with a dark basal spot, en-
tirely dark when elytral disc is entirely metallic. Disc with striae weak
and broken into spots; intervals flat; elytral pinch well developed; basal
ridge incomplete.
Legs - Variable in color but tarsi always dark. Fourth tarsal
segment strongly emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter usually pale, dark when elytra are completely
metallic; pygidium usually pale with two dark apical spots, entirely
dark if elytra are completely metallic.
Male genitalia- Arrmiture of endophallus as in figs. 62, 63 (note
that the spines in the row below the apex are larger than in viridipennis
and that the small patch of spines is directly beneath the right hand end
of the row above it); apex of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The
endophallic armature in five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - This is the only species of the subgenus Lebia north
of Mexico with short erect pubescence on the frons. The frons is usually
distinctly punctate, and over most of the range of pulchella the elytral pat-
tern of pale fasciae on a metallic background is distinctive.
Variation -Lebia pulchella is one of the more variable species of Lebia,
The color of the beetle as a whole, the shape of the pronotum, and the
sculpture of the pronotum vary geographically. In the eastern United
States and adjacent Canada west to Minnesota, Kansas, and Texas occurs
a form colored as follows: head dark with frons metallic; prothorax and
pterothorax entirely pale; elytra (fig. 20) with a wide prebasal pale
fascia and an apical pale fascia; the legs entirely pale except the tarsi;
the abdomen entirely pale. In addition the pronotum is very smooth and
longer (see Table 1). The pale apical fascia of the elytra is rarely ab-
sent in this form.
TABLE 1. Variation in ratio of 100 X pronotal length/pronotal width in
Lebia pulchella .
In southern Alberta, Saskatchewan and in North Dakota there
occurs a form similar to the above but the pale fascia at the apex of the
elytra is absent and the anterior margin of the dark posterior half is not
so jagged. The femora are dark tipped, and the pronotum is somewhat
Madge
169
more rugose and more transverse. South of this area in Wyoming, Col-
orado and New Mexico, is a form similar to the above but the basal dark
marking on the elytra is reduced (fig. 21); the femora are dark on the
distal half, and the pronotum is somewhat more rugose, especially in
New Mexico. In Arizona, specimens are like the above but the prono-
tum is strongly punctato-rugose. Finally, in interior California and at
least part of Nevada occurs an entirely dark form, the elytra, prono-
tum, and front of the head being a dark blue. The pronotum is moder-
ately rugose and the most transverse of all the known forms.
Interpretation of the variation described above is somewhat un-
certain at the present time. It would seem that the shape of the prono-
tum varies clinally on an east- west axis (Table 1). Also, the three cen-
tral populations from Arizona and New Mexico north to Alberta and Sas-
katchewan may showclinal variation in a north- south pattern in pronotal
rugosity and perhaps femoral coloration. However, the limited number
of western specimens available prohibits any conclusive statement on
this point.
The five forms described above are here considered conspecific
because they all possess an identical endophallic armature, a strongly
punctured frons with short erect hairs, and a distinctly hairy third an-
tennal segment. In addition they replace each other geographically. It
is expected that intermediates between the various color forms will be
found when the distribution is more completely known.
Subspecific names have not been applied here because of the lim-
ited number of specimens of the western forms and the resultant uncer-
tainty of the type of variation involved, whether clinal or subspecific.
The nominate form is the eastern one. The name vivida was applied to
the Arizona form with the strongly rugose pronotum and the name tahoensis
to the entirely dark form in California.
Distribution - This species occurs over most of the United States
and adjacent Canada (fig. 123), Over 200 specimens were studied from
the following localities.
CANADA
ALBERTA - Edmonton; Gull Lake; Happy Valley; Medicine Hat. ONTARIO - Campden. SASKATCHEWAN - Swift
Current.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Tuscaloosa ( Tuscaloosa Co. ) . ARIZONA - Canille (Santa Cruz Co.); Lake Mary (Coconino Co.); Phoenix
(Maricopa Co. ) ; Prescott (Yavapai Co. ) ; Santa Catalina Mountains ; Tucson (Pima Co. ) . ARKANSAS - Hope (Hempstead
Co.). CALIFORNIA - Cayton (Shasta Co. ) ; Marin Co. ; Sequoia National Park; Sugar Pine (Madera Co. ) . COLORADO -
Horsefly Pk. (Ouray Co.); Utah Creek (Costilla Co.), CONNECTICUT - Stamford (Fairfield Co.). DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Archbold Biological Station (Highlands Co.); Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Gainesville (Alachua
Co.); Homestead (Dade Co.); Jacksonville (Duval Co.); Lake Placid (Highlands Co.); Lake Luey; Osceola Co.; Tar-
pon Springs (Pinellas Co. ) ; Welake (Putnam Co.); Winter Park (Orange Co.). GEORGIA - Clarke Co. ILLINOIS - Saint
Clair Co. ; Willow Springs (Cook Co. ) . KANSAS - Manhattan (P iley Co. ) ; Topeka (Shawnee Co. ) ; Wallace Co. MARY-
LAND - Baltimore (Independent City); Chesapeake Beach (Calvert Co.); Nanjemoy (Charles Co.); Plum Point (Calvert
Co.) MASSACHUSETTS - Arlington (Middlesex Co. ) ; Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Dover (Norfolk Co. ) ; Martha's Vineyard
(Dukes Co.); Needham (Norfolk Co.). MICHIGAN - Detroit (Wayne Co.); Mecatawa (Ottawa Co.). MINNESOTA -
Olmsted Co, MISSISSIPPI - Oxford (Lafayette Co.). MISSOURI - Kansas City (Jackson Co. ) . NEBRASKA - Lincoln
(Lancaster Co.), NEVADA. NEW HAMPSHIRE - Mount Surprise, Intervale (Carroll Co.), NEW JERSEY - Anglesea;
Atlantic City (Atlantic Co.); Great Notch (Passaic Co.); Hopatcong (Sussex Co.); Manasquan (Monmouth Co. ) ; Ocean
City (Cape May Co. ); Orange (Essex Co. ); Orange Mountains; Point Pleasant (Ocean Co. ); Sea Isle City (Cape May
Co.); Seaside Heights (Ocean Co.); Woodbury (Gloucester Co. ) ; Woodside. NEW MEXICO - Jemez Mountains; Mes-
calero Peservation; Porvenir. NEW YORK - Bellport (Suffolk Co.); Cooks Falls (Delaware Co.); Fire Island; Long
Beach (Nassau Co.); New York City; Peekskill (Westchester Co.); Smith Town Bay (Suffolk Co. ) ; Yaphank (Suffolk
Co,). NORTH CAROLINA - Clayton (Johnston Co. ) ; Columbus Co. ; Oxford (Granville); P aleigh ( Wake Co . ) . NORTH
DAKOTA - Bismarck (Burleigh Co.). PENNSYLVANIA - Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co.); State College (Centre Co.);
Wilkes Barre (Luzerne Co.). RHODE ISLAND - Cranston (Providence Co. ) ; Warwick (Kent Co. ) . SOUTH CAROLINA -
Blackville (Barnwell Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.); Meredith. TENNESSEE - Greeneville (Green Co.); Knoxville (Knox
Co.). TEXAS - Brownsville (Cameron Co.); Carrizo Springs (Dimmit Co.); Corsicana (Navarro Co.); Kingsville
(Kleberg Co,); Plano (Collins Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Black Pond
(Fairfax Co. ) ; Falls Church (Fairfax Co. ) ; Mount Vernon (Fairfax Co. ) ; Saint Elmo; Springhill. WEST VIRGINIA.
WYOMING - Laramie (Albany Co.).
170
Revision of Lebia
12. Lebia (Lebia) viridipennis Dejean
Lebia viridipennis Dejean 1826 : 452. Type locality - "Amerique septentri-
onale". LeConte 1848 : 193. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and
Harold 1868 : 141. Chaudoir 1870 : 194. Horn 1872 : 135. Blat-
chley 1910 : 146. Casey 1920 : 250. Leng 1920 : 66 (Lebia),
Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia borea Hentz 1930 : 256. Type locality Massachusetts.
Lebia abrupta Casey 1920 : 250. Type locality - Indiana. NEW SYNONYMY.
Csiki 1932 : 1328 (Lebia),
Lebia viridipennis frontalis Csisey 1920 : 251. Type locality - Iowa (Keokuk).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia),
Lebia rhodeana Casey 1920 : 251. Type locality - Rhode Island (Boston
Neck). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia),
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 80 - 4. 12 mm; mean (22 specimens) 3.69 mm.
Head” Frons and vertex metallic (usually green), clypeus and
genae dark; frons with distinct microsculpture, with fine punctures and
slightly wrinkled by the eyes. Mouth parts mostly dark but mentum and
ligula rather pale; mentum with a tooth. Antennae with segments one
and two pale, three toelevendark but apical ones somewhat paler. Neck
not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral
margins widened basally; disc with very fine wrinkles, almost smooth.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc entirely metallic (usually green); epipleura dark.
Disc with striae very weak and breaking up into separate punctures, in-
tervals flat; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs - Coxae and trochanters pale; femora pale on the basal two
thirds, dark distally; tibiae pale medially, darkened at ends; tarsi
dark. Fourth segment of the hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Armature of male endophallus - As in figs. 64, 65 (note that the spines
in the row below the apex are smaller than in pulchella and that the small
patch of spines is not directly beneath the right hand end of the row of
spines above it); apex of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The en-
dophallic armature in five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Lebia viridipennis is similar in appearance to abdominalis ,
both having the elytra and frons metallic and the pronotum pale. How-
ever, in viridipennis the pronotal margins are widened basally and the fe-
mora are dark on the apical third.
Variation - There seems to be no significant variation in .
The metallic coloration is sometimes blue instead of green. The head
may then appear to be black.
Synonymy- Casey's Lebia abrupta , Lebia rhodeana ^ and subspecies Lebia
viridipennis frontalis B.T e here considered synonyms oi viridipennis. Both abrupta
and frontalis are based on the shape of the pronotum which is generally of
little value in Lebia , L. rhodeana is apparently the blue form in which the
Madge
171
metallic blue of the frons is very dark and appears black.
Distribution - Lebia viridipennis occurs in the eastern United States and
probably adjacent Canada (fig. 122). Over 325 specimens were studied
from the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Coleta; Mobile (Mobile Co.). CONNECTICUT - Cornwall (Litchfield Co.); New Haven (New Haven Co.).
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Capron; Cedar Keys (Levy Co.); De Funiak Springs (Walton Co.); Dunedin
(Pinellas Co.); Enterprise (Volusia Co.); Freeport (Walton Co.); Gainesville (Alachua Co.); Homestead (Dade Co.);
Kissimmee (Osceola Co.); Jacksonville (Duval Co.); La Belle (Henry Co.); Lake Letta (Highlands Co.); Lake Placid
(Highlands Co.); Royal Palm State Park (Dade Co.); Sarasota (Sarasota Co.); Sebastion (Indian River Co.); Sebring
(Highlands Co.); Tarpon Springs (Walton Co.). GEORGIA - Clarke Co. ; Newton (Baker Co.). ILLINOIS - Argo (Cook
Co.); Downers Grove (Du Page Co.); Glen Ellyn (Du Page Co.); Kickapoo State Park (Vermilion Co.); Lyons (Cook
Co.); Macon Co. ; Olive Branch (Alexander Co. ) ; Palos Park (Cook Co. ) ; Riverside (Cook Co. ) ; Urbana (Champaign
Co.); Utica (La Salle Co. ) ; Willow Springs (Cook Co. ) . INDIANA - Crawford Co. ; Elkhart (Elkhart Co. ) ; Gary (Lake
Co.); Hanover (Jefferson Co. ) ; Judson Co.; Knox Co.; Kosciusko Co.; Lafayette (Tippecanoe Co.); Marion Co.;
Perry Co. ; Posey Co. ; Vigo Co. IOWA - Iowa City (Johnson Co. ) . KANSAS - Douglas Co. ; Franklin Co.; Kansas
City (Wyandotte Co. ) ; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co.); Riley Co. ;T opeka (Shawnee Co. ) . MARY LAND - Great F alls (Mont-
gomery Co.); Plummers Island; TalbotCo. MASSACHUSETTS - Andover (Essex Co. ) ; Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Marion
(Plymouth Co.); Sherborn (Middlesex Co.); Stoneham (Middlesex Co.); Wareham (Plymouth Co.); Wellesley (Norfolk
Co.); Weston (Middlesex Co.). MICHIGAN - Detroit (Wayne Co.); East Lansing (Ingham Co.). MINNESOTA - Min-
neapolis (Hennepin Co. ) . MISSISSIPPI - Lucedale (George Co. ) . MISSOURI - Kansas City (Jackson Co. ) ; Saint Charles
(Saint Charles Co.); Saint Louis (Independent City); Webster Groves (Saint Louis Co.). NEBRASKA - Omaha (Douglas
Co.). NEW JERSEY - Anglesea; Atlantic City (Atlantic Co.); Boonton (Morris Co. ) ; Cape May (Cape May Co.); Clem-
enton (Camden Co.); Iona (Gloucester Co.); Lahaway; Lakehurst (Ocean Co.); Lakewood (Ocean Co.); Mountain View
(Passaic Co.); Orange (Essex Co.); Phillipsburg (Warren Co.); Snake Hill; Surf City (Ocean Co.); Westville (Glou-
cester Co.); Woodbury (Gloucester Co.). NEW YORK - Bear Mountain (Rockland Co.); New York City; Orient (Suffolk
Co.); Peekskill (Westchester Co. ) ; Tarrytown (Westchester Co.); Wyandanch (Suffolk Co.). NORTH CAROLINA -
Belhaven (Beaufort Co.); Black Mountains; Columbus Co. OHIO - Cincinnati (Hamilton Co. ) ; Cleveland (Cuyahoga
Co.); Oxford (Butler Co.); Summit Co. OKLAHOMA - Le Flore Co. PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny Co.; Ashbourne;
Ashley (Luzerne Co. ) ; Broomall (Delaware Co. ) ; Canadensis (Monroe Co. ) ; Conshohocken (Montgomery Co. ); Delaware
Water Gap (Monroe Co.); Easton (Northampton Co.); Grove City (Mercer Co. ) ; Hazleton (Luzerne Co.); Hummelstown
(Dauphin Co.); Kermet Square (Chester Co.); Lackawaxen (Pike Co.); Lenhartsville (Berks Co.); Martinsburg (Blair
Co.); Ohiopyle (Fayette Co.); Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co.); Pymatuning; State College (Centre Co.). RHODE
l^^LAND- Warwick (Kent Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Clemson (Oconee Co. ); Meredith. TENNESSEE. TEXAS - Browns-
vilt&S^ameron Co.); Cypress Mills (Blanco Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria Co.; Black Pond (Fairfax Co.)/ Great Falls
(Fairfax C-o<); Springhill. WEST VIRGINIA - Harpers Ferry (Jefferson Co.).
13. Lebia (Lebia) bitaeniata Chevrolat
Lebia bitaeniata Chevrolat 1834 : 2nd fascicle. Type locality - Orixaba
(Mexico). Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 137. Chaudoir 187 0 :
208. Bates 1883 : 228. Schaeffer 1910 : 397. Leng 1920 : 65.
(Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1332 (Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 53.
Lebia bicincta Laporte 1834 : 47. Type locality - "Orizaba, au Mexique".
Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 136.
Lia femorata Motschoulsky 1864 : 228. Type locality - "Am[erique] centr
[ale]".
Lebia callizona Bates 1878 : 607. Type locality - unknown. Bates 1883 :
228.
Lebia bitaeniata caUizona'i Schaeffer 1910 : 397. Leng 1920 : 65.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 36 - 3. 84 mm; mean (18 specimens) 3. 61 mm.
Head Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae metallic or pale; frons
with distinct but fine microsculpture, punctate- rugose at sides. Mouth
parts pale except for dark palpi and usually dark labrum and mandibles;
mentum with a tooth. Antennae with segment one pale, two and three
variable, four to eleven dark. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct, but fine microsculpture and with very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic with pale fasciae (fig. 22); epipleura pale
except for dark section adjacent tometallic basal marking of disc. Disc
172
Revision of Lebia
with striae distinct but broken, intervals flat; apical pinch well devel-
oped; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs - Coxae and trochanters pale, femora pale on basal third,
dark or metallic distally; tibiae and tarsi dark. Fourth segment of
hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter mostly or entirely pale, sometimes with alarge
dark apical marking on last segment. Pygidium dark.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 68, 69; apex
of median lobe long and slender (fig. 70). The endophallic armature in
three specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - The only other species occurring north of Mexico with
the elytral disc metallic with pale fasciae is pulchella. In southern Texas
where the -ranges of the two overlap the femora of bitaeniata are largely
dark while in pulchella they are entirely pale . In addition, the elytral pat-
terns are quite distinct (figs. 20, 21, 22) as well as the sculpture and
vestiture of the frons.
Variation- This species varies considerably in color. The head
varies from pale to metallic and similarly the large dark spot on the a-
pical abdominal sternum may be presenter absent. The elytral pattern,
at least north of Mexico, is however, quite constant.
Synonymy- As was pointed out by Schaeffer (1910) bitaeniata, callizona
and intermediates occur in the same population. Thus these two forms
cannot be regarded even as subspecifically distinct. It is uncertain
whether bitaeniata is conspecific with bifasciata De jean from South America.
The endophallic armatures of the two are slightly different but these
differences may be bridged in the intermediate geographic area.
Distribution- North of Mexico bitaeniata is known only from south-
eastern Texas; 17 specimens were studied from the following localities:
Brownsville (Cameron Co. ) ; Victoria (Victoria Co.).
14. Lebia (Lebia) rufopleura Schaeffer
Lebia rufopleura Schaeffer 1910 : 398. Type locality - Brownsville, Texas.
Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 {Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - 4. 12 -4. 48 mm; mean (7 specimens) 4.33 mm.
Head- Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae pale; frons with dis-
tinct microsculpture, with a few wrinkles by eyes. Mouth parts entirely
pale; mentum with a distinct tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not
strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale , lateral margins of pronotum transverse
in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc with fine transverse
wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic (green-blue or green); epipleura entirely
pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately convex; apical
pinch well developed; basal ridge of elytra usually complete.
I^egs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus weakly bi-
Madge
173
lobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 66, 67; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- This is the only member of the subgenus Le6/a with
metallic green or blue elytra and a pale pronotum and head found in
southeastern Texas. Although very similar externally to tuckeri and es-
pecially pleuritica the endophallic armature of rufopleura is very distinctive.
Variation - No significant variation was noticed in the small ser-
ies of specimens available for study.
Distribution- Lebia rufopleura is known only from southeastern Texas.
Eight specimens were studied from the following localities: Brownsville
(Cameron Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.).
15. Lebia (Lebia) pleuritica LeConte
Lebia pleuritica L^eC ante 1848 : 193. Type locality . .ad Lacum Super -
iorem. . . ". LeConte 1868 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 ;
140. Horn 1872 : 135. Blatchley 1910 : 146. Leng 1920 : 66
{Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 {Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 55.
Loxopeza pleuritica', Chaudoir 187 1 : 84.
Description
Lebia pleuritica is almost identical to rufopleura and is thus not redes-
cribed here. It differs in the following points. Length of elytra - 4.28-
5.40 mm; mean (27 specimens) 4.83 mm. Elytral disc with intervals
weakly to moderately convex. Male genitalia with armature of endophal-
lus as in fig. 71. The endophallic armature in five specimens was ex-
amined.
Discussion
Recognition - In the northeastern quadrant of the United States and
adjacent Canada this is the only species of Lebia s.s. with metallic green
elytra and a pale head and pronotum. However, unless specimens are
examined carefully for the subgeneric characters or the pale color of
the epipleura is noted they may be mistaken for Lebia (Loxopeza) alriucnlris.
Variation - The number of spines in the armature is variable. Ty-
pically there are five or six spines but there may be additional small
ones.
Relationships- Lebia pleuritica and the following two species, tuckeri
and arizonica , have very similar but rather variable genitalia. On the
basis of this structure they could be regarded as a single species. How-
ever, pleuritica has the fourth segment of the hind tarsus weakly bilobed
(not emarginate as in the other two) and as far as is known there is a
geographical gap separating pleuritica from the others. On these two fea-
tures pleuritica is regarded as a distinct species and the endophallic ar-
mature is considered of little value within this group.
Distribution- Lebia ph’uritica occurs in the northeastern quadrant of
174
Revision of Lebia
the United States and adjacent Canada (fig. 138). Over 100 specimens
were studied from the following localities.
CANADA
ONTARIO - Manotick; Marmora.
UNITED STATES
ILLINOIS - Cook Co. ; Galesburg (Knox Co.). IOWA - Ames (Story Co.); Iowa City (Johnson Co. ) . KANSAS - Law-
rence (Douglas Co. ) ; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co. ); RileyCo.; Tonganoxie (Leavenworth Co. ) . MASSACHUSETTS - Mount
Hermon (Franklin Co.). MICHIGAN - Birmingham (Oakland Co. ) ; Marquette (Marquette Co.); Rochester (Oakland Co.).
MINNESOTA - Saint Paul (Ramsey Co. ). NEW JERSEY - Palisades; Snake Hill. NEW YORK - Bronxville (Westchester
Co.); Cold Spring Harbor (Suffolk Co. ); Ithaca (Tompkins Co. ) ; Long Beach (Nassau Co. ) ; Massapegua (Nassau Co. ) ;
New Rochelle (Westchester Co. ); New York City; Orient (Suffolk Co. ) ; White Plains (Westchester Co. ) . PENNSYL-
VANIA - Easton (Northampton Co.); State College (Centre Co.); Wall (Allegheny Co.). SOUTH DAKOTA - Brookings
(Brookings Co.). WISCONSIN - Platteville (Grant Co.).
16. Lebia (Lebia) tuckeri (Casey)
Loxopeza tuckeri Casey 1920 : 237. Type locality - Arizona (Tucson).
Lebia tuckeri I Csiki 1932 : 1317 (Lebia).
Description
Lebia tuckeri is very similar to rufopleura and an entire description
need not be given here. It differs in the following ways. Length of ely-
tra - 2. 96-5. 08 mm; mean (25 specimens) 3. 99 mm. Elytral disc with
intervals weakly to moderately convex. Fourth segment of hind tarsus
emarginate and not bilobed. Male genitalia with armature of endophallus
similar to that of pleuritica (iig. 71) or somewhat more reduced. The
endophallic armature in 16 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Of the species of the subgenus Lebia occurring in the
southwestern United States from western Texas to southern California
only two, tuckeri and arizonica , have metallic green elytra and a pale head
and pronotum. In tuckeri the metepisternum is usually pale, in arizonica
it is dark. However, care must be taken in distinguishing the two by
this character since the metepisternum in tuckeri may appear dark when
the underlying tissue has pulled away from the sclerite. Also, the dark
coloration of the metepisternum may be weakly developed in arizonica.
Variation - In addition to the considerable variation in length, the
elytral intervals in tuckeri vary from moderately to weakly convex. The
endophallic armature varies from several spines as in pleuritica to no
spines. Typically there seem to be a few present.
Relationskips- The pleuritica - like species of Lebia in the southwes-
tern United States have presented a difficult problem. In the course of
this work they were at fir st consider ed to be a hybrid population between
pleuritica with endophallic armature consisting of a short row of spines and
a theoretical Mexican form which was smaller and had the endophallus
unarmed. When it was realized that pleuritica was both morphologically
and geographically distinct: and that the endophallic armature in this
group is of little value the southwestern populations were reexamined.
These were found to be divisible into two parts, the most diagnostic
feature being whether the metepisternum was pale or dark. The form
with the dark metepisternum also had the elytral intervals generally
flatter, never became as large as the pale form, lacked distinct micro-
Madge
175
sculpture on the frons, and appeared not to get into California. The pale
form with the stronger elytral intervals appears to be Casey's tuckeri
while the form with the dark metepisternum and the flatter elytral inter-
vals fits best Schaeffer 's arizonica .
Because the two forms are sympatric in Arizona they must be
considered either as distinct species or completely synonymous, but not
subspecies. The first choice is here consider ed the cor rect one because
the dark metepisternum and the rather flat elytral intervals seem to in-
dicate that arizonica is closer to the allopatric cyanipcnnis than to the pres ent
species. Since the characters separating these two species are weak,
experimental work needs to be carried out in order to confirm or reject
these conclusions.
Disirihution - Lcbia tuckeri occurs from western Texas to southern
California. Over 200 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
ARIZONA - Alamo Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains ; Baboquivari Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Brown's
Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Catalina Springs; Cave
Creek Ranch, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.); Cochise Stronghold, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Coyote
Mountains; Desert Museum, Tuscon Mountains (Pima Co.); Gila Bend Mountains ; Globe (Gila Co.); Kits Peak Rincon,
Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.);
Oracle (Pinal Co.); Organ Pipe National Monument (Pima Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.);
Patagonia Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Pinal Mountains; Portal (Cochise Co.); Pres-
cott (Yavapai Co.); Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains (Pima Co.); San Bernardino Ranch (Cochise Co. ) ; Tanque
Verde (Pima Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Tucson (Pima Co.). CALIFORNIA - Argus Moun-
tains (Inyo Co.); Berrego V. (.San Diego Co. ); Borego State Park (San Diego Co.); Chino Canyon (? San Bernardino
Co. ) ; Palm Springs (Riv erside Co. ) ; San Bernardino (San Bernardino Co. ) . COLORADO - Grand Junction (Mesa Co. ) .
NEW MEXICO - Las Cruces Las Vegas Hot Springs. TEXAS - Fort Davis (Jeff Davis Co.).
17. Lcbia (Lcbia) arizonica Schaeffer
Lcbia arizonica Schaeffer 1910 : 398. Type locality - Huachuca Mts . , Ari-
zona. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lcbia). Csiki 1932 : 1328 {Lcbia).
Description
Lcbia arizonica is very similar to rufoplcura, differing in the following
points. Length of elytra - 2.84 - 4.08 mm; mean (26 specimens) 3.64
mm. Frons with microsculpture lacking or indistinct. Metepisternum
infuscated. Elytral intervals flat or weakly convex. Fourth segment of
hind tarsus emarginate. Endophallus of male genitalia usually unarmed.
The endophallic armature in five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - See under tuckeri .
\’ariation - There appears to be no important variationin arizonica .
Relationship- See under tuckeri .
Distribution- Lcbia arizonica occurs from western Texas to southern
Arizona. Over 125 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
ARIZONA - Baboquivari Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Bisbee (Cochise Co.); Brown's Canyon, Baboqui-
vari Mountains (Pima Co.); Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiricahua Mountains
(Cochise Co.); Cochise Stronghold, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Dry Canyon, Sands Ranch, Whetstone Mountains
(Cochise Co.); Fort Huachuca (Cochise Co.); Globe (GilaCo.); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa CruzCo.);
Nogales (Santa Cruz Co. ); Noon Creek, Graham Mountains (Graham Co. ); Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino Co. ); Oracle
(Pinal Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Pinal Mountains (Gila Co.); Portal (Cochise Co.);
Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains (Pima Co.); Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co.); Sunnyside
Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.). NEW MEXICO - Double
Adobe Ranch, Animas Mountains (Hidalgo Co.); Silver City (Grant Co.). TEXAS - Alpine (Brewster Co.).
176
Revision of Lebia
18. Lebia (Lebia) cyanipennis Dejean
Lebia cyanipennis Deje3in 1831:385. Type locality - "Californie LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 138. Chaudoir 1870 :
174. Horn 1872 : 133. Casey 1920 : 25 1. Leng 1920 : 65 ( ) .
Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia).
Lamprias cyanipennis ^ Motschoulsky 1850 : 42.
Lebia ruficollis LeConte 1849 : 178. Type locality - San Diego. LeConte
1863:5. Gemminger and Harold 1869 : 140. Chaudoir 1870 : 175.
Horn 1872: 134. Leng 1920: 65 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lc6m).
Lebia montana Horn ±885 : 13 i. Type locality - Montana. NEW SYNONYMY.
Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 {Lebia).
Lebia barbarae Casey 1920 : 242. Type locality - California (Sta. Barbara).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1328 {Lebia).
Lebia melaena Hatch 1953 : 152. Type locality - southern B.C., southeast
Washington, western Oregon. NEW SYNONYMY.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 00-4.44 mm; mean (21 specimens) 3.85 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (frons usually
black); frons with indistinct microsculpture, scattered fine punctures
and fine wrinkles. Mouth parts variable in color, pale or infuscated;
mentum with a tooth. Antennae with segments one to three vg.riable in
color, dark or pale, others dark. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Varying from entirely pale (exceptintercoxal process)
to entirely dark. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins wid-
ened basally; disc with indistinct microsculpture and transverse wrin-
kles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum dark.
Elytra - Disc metallic; epipleura infuscated. Disc with striae
distinct, intervals flat; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually
complete.
Legs- Entirely dark (reddish brown) . Fourth segment of hind
tarsus emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Endophallus unarmed; apex of median lobe tapered
to a broad point. The endophallic armature in five specimens was exa-
mined.
Discussion
Recognition - The only species resembling the dark form of this
species (metallic elytra, the rest dark) is perita. These two can readily
be separated by the basal ridge of the elytra, complete in cyanipennis and
incomplete in perita. There is no species north of Mexico similar to the
light form (metallic elytra, pale prothorax and the rest dark).
Variation- There are two color forms in cyanipennis ^ a dark form
with the prothorax dark like the frons, and a light form with the prothorax
pale. Intermediate specimens with a reddish black pronotum connect
the two. In most specimens from Montana, Alberta, and Saskatchewan,
which always seem to be the pale form, the frons is reddish brown in-
stead of the usual black. A few specimens have the frons almost as dark
Madge
177
as normal. The basal three segments of the antennae also varyin color
from pale to dark.
Synonymy - As recognized by several earlier workers Lebia ruficollis
is only a color variant of cyanipennis . I have seen paratypes of L. montana
and this name applies to that section of the species with the somewhat
paler frons. The type of Lebia me laena Hatch seems to be a typical speci-
men of the dark form of cyanipennis. It was described under the erroneous
belief that in cyanipennis the basal segments of the antennae were always
dark. The type of Lebia barbarae Casey has been examined by G. E, Ball
and is also a specimen of the present species.
Distribution-Lebia cyanipennis occurs from southern British Columbia,
Alberta, and Saskatchewan south to New Mexico, Arizona, and California
(fig. 129) . Over 300 specimens were studied from the following localities.
CANADA
ALBERTA - Medicine Hat. BRITISH COLUMBIA - Creston; Salmon Arm; Vernon. SASKATCHEWAN - Eastland;
Val Marie.
UNITED STATES
ARIZONA - Ganado (Apache Co.); Tuba City (Coconino Co.). CALIFORNIA - Alma (Santa Clara Co. ); Azusa (Los
Angeles Co.); CampGreely (Fresno Co.); Carmel (Monterey Co. ) ; Carmen; Cloverdale (Sonoma Co. ) ; Colton (San
Bernardino Co. ); Crystal Lakes (San Mateo Co. ) ; Half Moon Bay (San Mateo Co. ) ; Kaweah (Tulare Co.); La Honda (San
Mateo Co.); Lake Co. ; La Mesa (San Diego Co. ) ; Los Angeles (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Los Gatos (Santa Clara Co. ); Marin
Co.; Mokelumne Hill (Calaveras Co. ) ; OrangeCo.; Palm Springs (River side Co. ) ; Palo Alto (Santa Clara Co. ) ; Paraiso
Springs (Monterey Co. ) ; Pasadena (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Patterson (Stanislaus Co.); Pine Flats Camp; Pomona (Los
Angeles Co.); Poso Creek (Kern Co. ) ; Poway (San Diego Co. ) ; Redondo; San Antonio Valley (Santa Clara Co. ) ; San
Benito Co.; San Bernardino (Saun Bernardino Co.); San Diego (San Diego Co.); San Francisco (San Francisco Co.); San
Juan Hot Springs; San Mateo (San Mateo Co. ) ; Santa Cruz Mountains; Santa Monica (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Santa Paula
(Ventura Co. ); Saticoy (Ventura Co. ); Sequoia National Park; Sierra National Forest (Madera Co.); Soboba Springs
(Riverside Co. ); Tanbark Flat (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Tassajara (Monterey Co. ) ; Tejon Canyon (Kern Co. ) ; Tulare Co. ;
Tuolumne Co.; Walker Pass (Kern Co.); Whittier (Los Angeles Co.). COLORADO - Cortez (Montezuma Co.); Durango
(La Plata Co. ). IDAHO - Moscow (Latah Co. ) . MONTANA. NEW MEXICO - Jemez Mountains ; Las Vegas Hot Springs.
OREGON - Klamath Co. ; Siskiyou (Jackson Co. ). TEXAS. UTAH - Provo (Utah Co. ) ; Stockton (Tooele Co. ) . WYOMING -
Yellowstone National Park.
19. Lebia (Lebia) viridis Say
Lebia viridis Say 1825 : 14. Type locality - not given. LeConte 1848 : 195.
LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 141. Chaudoir
1870 : 192. Horn 1872 : 134. Bates 1883 : 223. Blatchley 1910 :
146. Casey 1920 : 246. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 :
1331 (Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 56.
Lebia viridis Dejean 1825:271. Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale".
Lebia smaragdula Dejean 1831 : 387. Type locality - "Amerique septentri-
onale". LeConte 1848 : 195. LeConte 1863 : 5, Gemminger and
Harold 1868 : 140. Casey 1920 : 247.
Lebia viridis smaragdula \ Chaudoir 1870:192. Horn 1872: 134. Bates 1883 :
223.
Lamprias cyanellus Motschoulsky 1850 : 42. Type locality - not given.
Lebia cyanella\ LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 138.
Lebia cyanea (in part - incorrect synonymy with smaragdula ; cyanella); Leng
1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1329.
Lebia moesta LeConte 1850 : 203. Type locality - Michipicotin. LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 139.
Lebia viridis moesta; Chaudoir 1870 : 192. Horn 1872 : 134. Bates 1883 :
223. Leng 1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia viridis subopaca Schaeffer 1910 : 397. Type locality - Huachuca Mts. ,
Arizona. Leng 1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia cynicaCusey 1920 : 241. Type locality - Rhode Island (Boston Neck).
178
Revision of Lebia
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia).
Lebia truckeensis Casey 1920 : 241. Type locality - Nevada (Reno). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1331 {Lebia).
Lebia castigata Ca.sey 1920 : 242. Type locality - California (Placer Co.).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1328 (Lebia).
Lebia adolescens CaiSey 1920 : 242. Type locality - Rhode Island (Boston
Neck). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1328 (Lebia).
Lebia evoluta Casey 1920 : 243. Type locality - New Mexico (Las Vegas).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia histrica Casey 1920 : 243 . Type locality - Rhode Island (Boston Neck) .
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia bracata Casey 1920 : 243. Type locality - "Probably from Indiana".
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1328 (Lebia).
Lebia magica Casey 1920: 244. Type locality - Missouri (St. Louis). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia ineitata Casey 1920 : 244. Type locality - California (Hoopa Valley,
Humboldt Co.). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia subaffinis Casey 1920 : 244. Type locality - New Mexico (Fort Win-
gate). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia vermiculina Casey 1920 : 245. Type locality - Rhode Island (Boston
Neck). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia prominens Casey 1920 : 245. Type locality - "Probably taken in In-
diana". NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia planif era Casey 1920 : 246. Type locality - Arizona (Tucson). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia eobaltina Casey 1920 : 246. Type locality - Mexico (Colonia Garcia,
Ziena MadreMts., Chihuahua). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 :
1333 ( Lebia).
Lebia papago Casey 1920 : 247. Type locality - Arizona (Tucson). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia papago trajeetaC as ey 1920 : 247. Type locality - Arizona. NEW SY-
NONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia duluthiana Casey 1920:247. Type locality - Minnesota (Duluth). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - Shiny metallic form: 2. 00- 3. 96 mm; mean (21
specimens) 3. 00 mm. Dark form: 2. 00-3. 16 mm; mean (20 specimens)
2.53 mm. Dull blue form: 2.84-3.76 mm; mean (20 specimens) 3.47
mm.
Head- Frons and vertex metallic or dark when elytral disc dark,
clypeus and genae dark; frons with fine striae by eyes, occasionally at
center, microsculpture variable. Mouth parts dark or infuscated; men-
tum with a tooth. Antennae entirely dark, segments 1-3 usually with a
slight metallic tinge in specimens with metallic elytral disc. Neck not
strongly constricted. Eyes usually prominent, a few specimens small
and flattened.
Prothorax- Entirely dark or metallic. Pronotum transverse in
shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc with distinct microscul-
pture, with fine transverse wrinkles.
Madge
179
Pterothorax- Sterna., pleura, and scutellum usually dark with traces
of metallic coloration, sometimes entirely dark.
Elytra- Disc dark or metallic; epipleura dark or infuscated.
Disc with striae distinct, sometimes slightly broken; intervals flat or
slightly convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually com-
plete, sometimes incomplete.
Legs- Entirely dark, sometimes slightly metallic.
Abdomen - Venter dark, sometimes slightly metallic, Pygidium
dark.
Male genitalia- ArmaitUTe of endophallus as in figs. 72, 73 (note
lateral position of the sclerotized lobe); apex of median lobe tapered to
abroad point. The endophallic armature in 24 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Le5/a y/nd/s may be confused with pumila or perita. Non-
metallic forms of viridis appear very similar to dark specimens of pumila
but the two can be readily separated by the width of the lateral lobes of
the fifth abdominal sternum (wider than the central trough in pumila, e-
qual to or narrower in viridis), by the basal ridge of the elytra (incom-
plete in pumila, usually complete in viridis), and by the color of the third
antennal segment (usually pale in pumila, dark in viridis). From perita,
Lebia viridis can be separated by its usually complete basal ridge and the
metallic color of the head and pronotum (usually shiny black, sometimes
slightly metallic in perita). In addition males can be separated by the
structure of the endophallic armature.
Variation- Most specimens of viridis are shiny metallic above (some
shade of blue or green), less so underneath with small specimens often
lacking any metallic coloration on the underparts. Across the northern
United States and adjacent Canada and southward in the cordilleran re-
gion occurs a form with the elytral disc, head, and pronotum dark with
slight aeneous reflections. The eyes of eastern specimens of this dark
form are small and flattened but in the western cordilleran region the
eyes are more prominent as in the shiny metallic form. In the south-
western United States occurs a dull blue form in which the frons and pro-
notum are more strongly sculptured.
Relationships - As noted above there are basically three forms,
a shiny metallic form, a dark form, and a dull blue form. The endo-
phallic armature of these forms is the same and the distribution of the
shiny metallic form completely overlaps that of the other two.
The three forms are here regarded as conspecific and the names
applied to these ( moesta to the dark form and subopaca to the dull blue form)
are synonymized under viridis. Until field work is done on this complex
a final solution probably cannot be obtained. One possible explanation
is that these are polymorphic variants adapted to mimic various species
of the probable host genus Altica . For example the dull blue form may
be mimicking the dull blue Altica obliterata LeConte which occurs in the
southwestern United States.
Synonymy -Th.e types of the numerous Casey names included in
synonymy here were examined by G. E. Ball. Most of them do not occur
within the range of perita with which viridis is most likely to be confused.
180
Revision of Lebia
Distribution- Lebia viridis occurs throughout the United States. In
Canada its exact distribution is unknown but specimens have been col-
lected as far north as the Yukon Territory (fig. 139). Over 3,300 speci-
mens were studied. It does not seem necessary to list the numerous
United States localities from which viridis has been taken. The Canadian
records are as follows.
ALBERTA - Brooks; Calgary; Edmonton; Lethbridge; McMurray; Medicine Hat; Nordegg; Pincher Creek; Slave
Lake; Tilley; Turner Valley; Waterton. BRITISH COLUMBIA - Atbara; Creston; Fernie; Gale; Glenemma; Kam-
loops; Lytton; Mission City; Nanaimo; Oliver; Pender Harbor; Robson; Royal Oak; Salmon Arm; Steelhead; Trinity
Valley; Vancouver; Vernon; Victoria; Wynndel. MANITOBA - Aweme; Husavick; Mackinak; Saint Lazare; The Pas.
NEW BRUNSWICK - Fundy National Park. NORTHWEST TERRITORIES - Fort Simpson. NOVA SCOTIA - Halifax;
Millsville; Truro. ONTARIO - Bells Corners; Brittania; Constance Bay; Dorchester; Frankford; Jarvis Lake;
Kingsville; Marmora; Midland; Ottawa; Pelee Island; Prince Edward Co. ; Toronto. QUEBEC Aylmer; Como;
Covey Hill; Duparquet; Mont Albert; Mont Jaques Cartier; Perkins Mills; Thunder Fiver. SASKATCHEWAN - Carle-
ton; Cut Knife; Cypress Hills; Kenosee Lake; Pike Lake; Swift Current. YUKON TERRITORY - Rampart House.
20. Lebia (Lebia) marginicollis Dejean
Lebia mar ginicollis Dejean 1825 : 271. Type locality - "Georgie". LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 139. Chaudoir 1870 :
184. Horn 1872 : 134. Bates 1883 : 222. Casey 1920 : 240.
Leng 1920 : 65 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia), Blackwelder
1944 : 54.
Lebia cyanea Dejescn 1831 : 386. Type locality - "L'ile de Cuba". NEW
SYNONYMY. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 137 . Schaeffer 1910 :
397. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia). Black-
welder 1944 : 53.
Lebia viridis cyanea ; Horn 1872 : 134. Bates 1883 : 223. Chaudoir 1870 :
192.
Lebia aff/n/s De jean 1871 : 387. Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale" .
LeConte 1848 : 195. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold
1868 : 136.
Lebia marginicollis affinis; Chaudoir 1870 : 184. Horn 1872 : 134. Bates 1883 ;
222. Leng 1920 : 65. Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia).
Lamprias limbicollis Motschoulsky 1859 : 145. Type locality - Canada.
Description
Length of elytra- Eastern specimens from Texas eastward: 2.16-
3.28 mm; mean (23 specimens) 2.59 mm. New Mexico specimens:
2. 84 -4. 08mm; mean (6 specimens) 3.52 mm. Arizona specimens :
3. 28-4. 16 mm; mean (23 specimens) 3. 78 mm.
Head- Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (frons darkest,
with a greenish tinge in some specimens); frons striated to a variable
extent. Mouth parts infuscated; mentum with a tooth. Antennae with
segments one to three infuscated (basal segment palest), four to eleven
dark. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely dark except pale lateral mar gins of pronotum.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
usually with distinct microsculpture and fine wrinkles (best developed
when frontal sculpture strong).
Pterothorax- Sterna, pleura, and scutellum dark.
Elytra- Disc metallic; epipleura infuscated. Disc with striae
weak, sometimes breaking up into spots; intervals flat; apical pinch
well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Madge
181
Legs - Entirely dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly
emarginate or weakly bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 74, 75 (note
the central position of the sclerotized lobe in the right view of the endo-
phallus); apex of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallus
armature in three specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Lebia mar ginicollis is our only Lebia with the elytra
metallic and the rest of the body dark except for pale pronotal margins.
Variation- Both size and frontal sculpture vary considerably in
marginicollis . Specimens from Texas and eastward are smaller than those
from Arizona and most specimens from New Mexico (see elytral lengths
in description). Similarly the frontal sculpture is weaker, sometimes
entirely absent, in the eastern specimens while it is well developed in
the New Mexico and Arizona populations.
Relationships - The larger, more strongly sculptured western
form is here considered conspecific with typical marginicollis of the eastern
United States. The endophallic armature is the same in both forms, the
frontal sculpture of the eastern form varies towards that of the western
form, and in New Mexico large, small, and intermediate sizes occur
together.
Synonymy -The synonymy given here is probably incomplete. The
tropical species chalcoptera , pleuroderat striatifrons , and cupripennisy which dif-
fer mainly in size and strength of the frontal striations, are probably
forms of this species. Infact, L. cupripennis is usually placed as a synonym
(Leng 1920, Csiki 1932) butas it comes from Chile it seems best to leave
it out with the other tropical species.
Both Chaudoir (1868) and Lindroth (1955) studied the type of Lebia
cyanea and both considered it to be a form similar to viridis . But as
Schaeffer (1910) points out Dejean's description refers to a species sim-
ilar to marginicollis. The original description mentions the pale basal seg-
ment of the antennae, the frons striated between the eyes, and the pale
pronotal margins , characters which do not fit viridis. Possibly the labels
on the original type have become switched to another specimen. I prefer
to use the name in the sense of the original description and regard it as
a synonym of marginicollis as the type locality, Cuba, is so close to Florida
where marginicollis is common.
Distribution - This species occurs mainly acros s the southern United
States from Florida to Arizona. In the east it ranges northward to Mich-
igan (fig. 125). It may occur in southern Ontario also as the type locality
of limbicollis is given as Canada. Over 200 specimens were studied from
the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Mobile (Mobile Co.). ARIZONA - Graham Mountains; Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino Co.); Pe^a Blanca
(Santa Cruz Co.); Pine (Gila Co.); Sierra Ancha Mountains; Whiteriver (Navajo Co.). ARKANSAS - Polk Co. FLOR-
IDA - Belleair (Pinellas Co.); Biscayne Bay (Dade Co.); Centreville; Crescent City (Putnam Co.); Crystal River
(Citrus Co.); Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Enterprise (Volusia Co.); Everglades (Collier Co.); Fort Myers (Lee Co.);
Gainesville (Alachua Co. ) ; Hillsboro Co. ; Jacksonville (Duval Co. ); Kissimmee (Osceola Co. ) ; Lakeland (Polk Co. ) ;
Lake Okeechobee; Levy Co.; Naples (Collier Co.); Royal Palm State Park (Dade Co.); Saint Augustine (Saint Johns
Co.); Sarasota (Sarasota Co.); Sebastian (Indian River Co.); Tampa (Hillsborough Co.); Winter Park (Orange Co.).
GEORGIA - Okefenokee Swamp; Pabun Co.; Tifton (Tift Co.). ILLINOIS - Willow Springs (Cook Co.). INDIANA -
182
Revision of Lebia
Gibson Co.; Marion Co. ; Putnam Co. LOUISIANA - Franklin (Saint Mary Co.); Logansport (DeSoto Co.); Tallulah
(Madison Co. ) ; Vowel!' s Mill (Natchitoches Co. ); Winnfield (Winn Co.). MICHIGAN -Sawyer Dunes (Barrien Co. ) .
MISSISSIPPI - Lucedale (George Co.). MISSOURI - Roaring River State Park (Barry Co.). NEW MEXICO - Gila Hot
Springs; Socorro Co. NORTH CAROLINA - Black Mountains; Faison (Duplin Co.). OKLAHOMA - McAlester (Boone
Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Camden (Kershaw Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.). TENNESSEE - Grassy Cove (Cumberland
Co.). TEXAS - Brownsville (Cameron Co.); Columbus (Colorado Co.); Cypress Mills (? Blanco Co.); Dallas (Dallas
Co.); Denton (Denton Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.). VIRGINIA - Boykins (Southampton Co.).
21.Lebia (Lebia) perita Casey
Lebia perita Casey 1920 : 241. Type locality - California (Hoopa Valley,
Humboldt Co.). Csiki 1932 : 1330 {Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 56 - 3.72 mm; mean (21 specimens) 3.33 mm.
Head - Frons and vertex dark, often with a slight metallic tinge,
clypeus and genae dark; frons with striae, best developed near eyes,
shortest and weakest medially. Mouth parts dark except ligula and base
of palpi; mentum with a tooth. Antennae dark, basal segments lightest.
Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely dark, sometimes slightly metallic . Pronotum
transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc with distinct
microsculpture and wavy transverse wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum dark.
Elytra.. Disc metallic; epipleura dark or infuscated. Disc with
striae distinct but poorly developed, intervals flat or weakly convex;
apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Entirely dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly
emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 76, 77; apex of
median lobe tapering to a broad point. The endophallic armature in five
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Within its range perita may be confused with cyanipennis
or viridis . However, in specimens of the last two species the basal ridge
of the elytra is complete while it is incomplete in perita . In cyanipennis the
frons is not striated as in perita, and viridis usually has the frons distinct-
ly metallic unless the elytra are also dark.
Variation- No major variation was noted in perita.
Synonymy- The name Lebia cyanella {Motsclcionls'ky) , here regarded
as a synonym of viridis, may apply to the present species. Motschoulsky
does compare it to his limbicollis {- mar gini colli s) which is certainly very
much like the present species except in the color of its pronotal mar-
gins. However, as it is impossible to say without seeing the type I have
placed it in viridis following Chaudoir (1868) and Horn (1872) rather than
use a doubtful name.
Distribution - Lebia perita ranges from southern British Columbia to
southern California (fig. 140). Over 200 specimens were studied from
the following localities.
Madge
183
CANADA
BRITISH COLUMBIA - Creston; Mabel Lake; Nanaimo; Sidney; Sirdar; Victoria; Wyndel.
UNITED STATES
CALIFORNIA - Azusa (Los Angeles Co.); Blocksburg (Humboldt Co.); Butte Creek Canyon, nr. Chico (Butte Co.);
Camp Creely (Fresno Co.); Camp Nelson (Tulare Co.); Carrville (Trinity Co.); Colton (San Bernardino Co.); Cor-
ralitos (Santa Cruz Co.); Dalzura (San Diego Co.); Davis Creek (Modoc Co.); Dunsmuir (Siskiyou Co.); Forest Home
(San Bernardino Co. ); Fort Seward (Humboldt Co. ) ; Fort Tejon (Kern Co.); Gilroy Hot Springs (Santa Clara Co.);
Guerneville (Sonoma Go.); Hullville (Lake Go.); Kaweah (Tulare Co.); Lagunitas (Marin Co.); La Honda (San Mateo
Co.); Lake Tahoe; Laurel Dell (Lake Co.); Miami Ranger Station (Mariposa Co.); Mill Creek Canyon (San Bernardino
Co.); Mokelumne Hill (Calaveras Co.); Murphys (Calaveras Co.); Oakland (Alameda Co.); Palm Springs (Riverside
Co.); Pasadena (Los Angeles Co.); Riverton (El Dorado C o. ) ; San Mateo (San Mateo Co.); Sequoia National Park;
Sequel Creek (Santa Cruz Co.); Sonora (Tuolumne Co.); Sugar Pine (Madera Co.); Trinity National Forest (Trinity
Co.); Twin Rocks (Mendocino Co.); Warner Mountains (Lake Co.); Willow Creek (Humboldt Co.). IDAHO - Hayden
Lake (Kootenai Co.); Kellogg (Shoshone Co.); Mountain Home (Elmore Co.). OREGON - Baker Greek; Cline Falls
State Park (Deschutes Co.); Corvallis (Benton Co.); Dayton (Yamhill Co.); Grants Pass (Josephine Co.); Hubbard
(Marion Co.); Marshfield; McMinnville (Yamhill Co. ); Portland (Multnomah Co. ) ; Port Orford (Curry Co. ); Pros-
pect (Jackson Co.); The Dalles (Wasco Co.); Toll Gate (Umatilla Co.). WASHINGTON - Ariel (Cowlitz Co.); Baring
(King Co.); Central Ferry (Whitman Co.); Elk (Spokane Co.); Monroe (Snohomish Co.); Naches (Yakimo Co.); New-
man Lake (Spokane Co. ); Oakville (Grays Harbor Co.); Olympia (Thurston Co.); Paradise Park, Mount Rainier (Pierce
Co.); Pullman (Whitman Co.); Seattle (King Co.); Soda Springs; Toppenish (Yakima Co.); Villa; Walla Walla (Walla
Walla Co. ).
22. Lebia (Lebia) scapula Horn
Lebia scapula Horn 1885 : 132. Type locality - Arizona. Leng 1920 : 66
{Lebia)'. Csiki 1932 : 1331 {Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - 2,76 - 3.52 mm; mean (21 specimens) 3.16 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; Irons with in-
distinct microsculpture and fine punctures, sometimes slightly wrinkled
at sides. Mouth parts pale except for infuscated palpi; mentum with a
tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins broadening basally; disc
very finely rugose.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (typical pattern as in fig.
23); epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals weakly to mod-
erately convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually com-
plete.
Legs- Entirely pale; fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 78, 79; apex of
median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in 5
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- This is the only species in. the southwestern United
States with at least the apex and more or less the entire mesal half of
each elytron dark.
Variation- The extent of the pale elytral markings varies from
entirely absent (except for the lateral margins) to covering the anterior
three fourths of the lateral areas of the disc. Usually only a small hu-
meral pale marking is present.
Notes- As Lebia scapula occurs in Mexico as well as Arizona (speci-
mens seen from Puebla, Mexico) the Mexican populations may be known
under a different and possibly earlier name. The description of Lebia
cymindoides Bates fits very well and the two may prove to be the same. If
184
Bevision of Lebia
so the name cymindoides will have priority. However, until the type of
cymindoides and possibly other species can be checked I prefer to use the
name scapula.
Distribution - North of Mexico scapula is known only from Arizona
and New Mexico, Over 600 specimens were studied from the following
localities .
ARIZONA - Badger; Bear Valley, Tumacacori Mountain {Santa Cruz Co.); Brown's Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains
(Pima Co.); Canelo (Santa Cruz Co.); Carr Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiricahua
Mountains (Cochise Co.); Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.); Cochise Stronghold,
Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Continental (Pima Co.); Douglas (Cochise Co.); Dry Canyon, southeast end of Whet-
stone Mountains (Cochise Co.); Fort Huachuca (Cochise Co.); Gilman Ranch, Mule Mountains (Cochise Co.); Gleeson;
Globe (Gila Co.); Kit's Peak Rincon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa
Cruz Co.); Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.); Noon Creek, Graham Mountains (Graham Co.); Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino
Co.); Oracle (Pinal Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Patagonia Mountains (Santa Cruz
Co.); Pearce (Cochise Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Pinery Canyon, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.);
Ruby (Santa C ruz Co. ) ; Santa Catalina Mountains ; Sedona (Coconino Co. ); Sonoita (Santa C ruz Co. ) ; Southwest Research
Station, Portal (Cochise Co.); Sunnyside Canyon, Huachuca Mountains (Cochise Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains
(Cochise Co.); Tucson (Pima Co.); White Mountains (Gila Co.); Yanks Spring, Sycamore Canyon, Tumacacori Moun-
tains (Santa Cruz Co.). NEW MEXICO - Double Adobe Ranch, Animas Mountains (Hidalgo Co.).
23. Lebia (Lebia) analis Dejean
Lebia analis Dejean 1825 : 265 . Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale
Chaudoir 1870 : 211. Horn 1872 : 136. Blatchley 1910 : 147.
Casey 1920 : 254. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1328
(Lebia). Blackwelder 1922 : 52.
Lebia ornata (in part, incorrect synonymy with analis); LeConte 1848: 194.
LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 140.
Lebia anchora Chevrolat 1835 (fascicle 6 No. 132). Type locality - Orixaba
(Mexico). NEW SYNONYMY. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 136.
Chaudoir 1870 : 212. Bates 1883 : 229. Casey 1920: 253. Csiki
1932 : 1331 (Lebia). Blackwelder 1922 : 53.
Lebia bonellii Putzeys 1845 : 391. Type locality - unknown. Gemminger
and Harold 1868 : 137.
Lebia appendiculata Chdiudoix 1870 i 212. Type locality - "Louisiane". Casey
1920 : 253.
Lebia analis appendiculata; Horn 1872 : 136. Leng 1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki
1932 : 1328 ( Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 32 -4. 12 mm; mean (24 specimens) 3. 38 mm.
Head- Frons , vertex, clypeus and genae dark (frons usually black);
frons striated except for a triangular area above clypeus. Mouth parts
more or less pale, except gula, scrobes, and tips of mandibles dark,
and labrum and palpi somewhat infuscated; mentum with a tooth. An-
tennae with segments one to three pale, four to eleven infuscated but
becoming pale apically. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins broadening basally;
disc with striae regularly arranged on upper lateral areas, becoming
confused at center and base.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc varying from entirely dark to extensively pale(fig.
25; intermediate condition, fig. 24); epipleura pale. Disc with striae
distinct, intervals moderately convex; apical pinch well developed; ba-
sal ridge usually complete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Madge
185
Abdomen - Venter pale, darker apically. Pygidium infuscated.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 80, 81; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
5 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- The dark (usually almost black) striated frons and the
pale abdomen combine to distinguish analis from all our other Lebia ex-
cept scalpta. Where these two overlap in Texas the elytral pattern of
scalpta is distinctive (fig. 26). In Arizona the elytral patterns of the two
are very similar but the pale apical marking is interrupted by a fine black
border along the suture in analis, uninter rupted in sca/pfa . In addition,
the upper lateral regions of the pronotum are definitely striated in analis,
rugose in scalpta.
Variation - The color pattern of the elytra varies considerably in
analis. Specimens from the easternhalf of the United States usually have
small humeral and apical pale spots. However, in some specimens the
elytral disc is entirely dark while mothers, especially those from Texas,
it is paler and approaches that of the pale western form found in Arizona.
The western form is always very pale and shows little variation.
Synonymy- The name Lebia anchora Chevrolat probably applies to the
pale western form of analis and is here considered a synonym. Although
I have not seen the type of anchora the color pattern agrees and in the ori-
ginal description Chevrolat mentions the ridges on the pronotum.
Distribution- Lebia analis occurs in the eastern United States and in
the south as far west as Arizona (fig. 130). Over 850 specimens were
studied from the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Auburn (Lee Co.); Tuscaloosa (Tuscaloosa Co.). ARIZONA - Canelo (Santa Cruz Co.); Madera Canyon,
Santa Rita Mountains; Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); P"ena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Southwest Research Station, Portal
(Cochise Co.); Tucson (Pima Co.); Yanks Springs, Pajaritos Mountains (nr. Ruby, Santa Cruz Co;). ARKANSAS -
Hope (Hempstead Co.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Alachua (Alachua Co.); Gainesville (Alachua Co.);
Jacksonville (DuvalCo.); Key West (Monroe Co.); Levy- Warburg Lake (Alachua Co.); Marion Co. GEORGIA - Clarke
Co.; DeWitt (Mitchell Co. ) ; Kennesaw Mountain (Cobb Co. ) ; Lizella (Bibb Co. ) ; Thomasville (Thomas Co. ) . ILLINOIS -
Boskey Dell; Cahokia (Saint Clair Co.); Chicago (Cook Co.); Fairmount (Vermilion Co.); Fort Sheridan (Lake Co.);
Gorham (Jackson Co.); Homer (Champaign Co.); Kickapoo State Park (Vermilion Co.); La Grange (Cook Co.); Olive
Branch (Alexander Co.); Ottawa (LaSalle Co.); Palos Park (Cook Co.); Prairie du Rocher (Randolph Co.); Springfield
(Sangamon Co.); U rbana (Champaign Co. ) . INDIANA - Crawford Co.; Knox Co.; Lafayette (Tippecanoe Co.); Posey
Co.; Putnam Co.; Staake Co. IOWA - Ames (Story Co.); Sioux City (Woodbury Co.). KANSAS - Kansas City (Wyan-
dotteCo.); Lawrence (Douglas Co. ) ; Manhattan (Riley Co. ) ; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co. ) ; Sedgewick Co. ; Topeka (Shaw-
nee Co.). KENTUCKY. LOUISIANA - Alexandria (Rapides Co.); Baton Rouge (East Baton Rouge Co.); Bayou Sara;
Camp Plauche; Covington (Saint Tammany Co.); Harahan (Jefferson Co.); Logansport (Desoto Co.); New Iberia (Iberia
Co.); New Orleans (Orleans Co.); Opelousas (Saint Landry Co.); Tallulah (Madison Co.); MARYLAND - Baltimore
(Independent City); Chesapeake Beach (Calvert Co.); Great Falls (Montgomery Co.); Joyce Lane; Plummers Island.
MASSACHUSETTS- Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Lexington (Middlesex Co. ); Stoughton (Norfolk Co. ) . MICHIGAN- Harbert
Dunes (Barrien Co.); Oakland Co. MINNESOTA - Olmsted Co.; Saint Peter (Nicollet Co.). MISSISSIPPI - Holly Bluff
(Yazoo Co. ); Jackson (Hinds Co. ) ; Natchez (Adams Co. ) . MISSOURI - Cuba (Crawford Co. ) ; Langdon (Atchison Co. );
Saint Charles (Saint Charles Co.); Saint Louis (Independent City). NEBRASKA - Omaha (Douglas Co.); Saltillo (Lan-
caster Co.); Waverley ( Lancaster C o. ) . NEW JERSEY - Chester (M orris Co. ) ; Collingswood (Camden Co. ) ; Cumber-
land Co. ; Newark (Essex Co. ) ; Oradell (Bergen Co. ) ; Orange (Essex Co. ); Orange Mountains; Woodbury (Gloucester
Co.). NEW YORK - Bear Mountain (Rockland Co. ) ; Bellport (Suffolk Co. ) ; Florida (Orange Co. ) ; New Rochelle (West-
chester Co.); Wyandanch (Suffolk Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Clayton (Johnston Co.); Franklin Co.; Hot Springs
(Madison Co. ) ; Lake Junaluska (Haywood Co.); Pikeville (Wayne Co.); Pollocks ville (Jones Co.); Raleigh (Wake Co.);
Scotland Co.; Simpson Co. ; Southern Pines (Moore Co.); Swanquarter (Hyde Co.); Whiteville (Columbus Co.); Willard
(Pender Co. ). OHIO - Cincinnati (Hamilton Co. ); Columbus (F ranklin Co. ); Holmes Co. ; Marietta (Washington Co. );
West Alexandria (Preble Co. ) . OKLAHOMA - Catoosa (Rogers Co. ) ; Tulsa (Tulsa Co. ) , PENNSYLVANIA - Ashbourne;
Avondale (Chester Co.); Castle Rock; Darby (Delaware Co.); Easton (Northampton Co.); Gladwyne (Montgomery Co.);
Hummelstown (Douphin Co.); Kennet Square (Chester Co.); Lancaster (Lancaster Co.); Lansdowne (Delaware Co.);
Ohiopyle (Fayette Co.); Ole Bull; Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co.); Pottstown (Montgomery Co. ) ; State College (Centre
Co.); Tinicum (Delaware Co. ) ; Wilkes Barre (Luzerne Co. ) ; Williamsport (Lycoming Co. ) . SOU TH CAROLINA - Aiken
(Aiken Co.); Camden (Kershaw Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.); Columbia (Richland Co.); Florence (Florence Co.);
Meredith; .Summerton (Clarendon Co.). TENNESSEE - Dyer Co.; Elmwood (Smith Co.); Grassy Cove (Cumberland
Co. ); Knoxville (Knox Co. ); TEXAS - Arlington (Tarrant Co. ); Beeville (Bee Co. ); Brownsville (Cameron Co. ); Cy-
press Mills (? Blanco Co.); Dallas (Dallas Co.); Denton (Denton Co.); Greenville (Hunt Co.); Laredo (Webb Co.);
186
Revision of Lebia
New Braunfels (Comal Co. ) ; Port Isabel (Cameron Co. ); San Diego (Duval Co. ) ; Uvalde (Uvalde Co. ); Victoria (Victoria
Co.). VERMONT - Burlington (Chittenden Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Arlington (Arlington Co.);
Boykins (Southampton Co. ) ; Dismal Swamp; Falls Church (Fairfax Co. ); Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.); Great
Falls (Fairfax Co. ); Nelson Co.; Norfolk (Norfolk Co.); Petersburg (Chesterford Co.); Roanoke River, Route 1;
Rosslyn (Arlington Co.). WEST VIRGINIA - Eastern Panhandle; Spruce Knob, Riverton (Pendleton Co.); White Sulphur
Springs (Greenbrier Co.).
24- Lebia (Lebia) scalpta Bates
Lebia scalpta Bates 1883 : 230. Type locality - Mexico, Jala pa or Yucatan.
Csiki 1932 : 1338 {Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 55.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 52 - 4. 40 mm; mean (8 specimens) 4. 07 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (frons usually
black); frons striated except for a triangular area above clypeus. Mouth
parts more or less pale except for infuscated gula; mentumwith a tooth.
Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins broadening basally; disc
strongly wrinkled.
Ptero thorax ~ Sterna, pleura, and scute Hum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings, either patterned as in fig.
26 or lateral vitta reduced and pattern approaching that of analis (fig. 25);
epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately convex;
apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly
emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter pale. Pygidium pale or slightly infuscated.
Male genitalia ^ Armature of endophallus as in figs. 82, 83; apex
of the median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature
of two specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - See under Lebia analis^
Variation - The four Texas specimens seemidentical in. color pat-
tern to Bates' illustration of scalpta. The five Arizona specimens, how-
ever, lack the anterior section of the dark lateral vitta although in four
of them the remaining lateral spot extends forward slightly. In the fifth
the pattern is like that of the pale form of analis.
Relationships - There is no doubt that this is a distinct species from
analis, differing in color pattern, sculpture of the pronotum, and struc-
ture of the male genitalia. I had at first considered the Texas and Ari-
zona samples of scalpta as being specifically distinct from each other.
Because the lateral elytral marking of some of the Arizona specimens is
not completely reduced this view is no longer held. As there were no
males in the Texas sample the genitalia of the two geographical groups
have not been compared.
Distribution - North of Mexico this species is knownfrom Texas and
Arizona. Nine specimens were studied from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.). TEXAS -
Laredo (Webb Co.); Uvalde (Uvalde Co.).
Madge
187
25- Lebia (Lebia) solea Hentz
Lebia solea Hentz 1830 : 255. Type locality - Massachusetts. Lutshnik
1922 : 72. Csiki 1932 : 1342 { Dianchomena) . Blackwelder 1944 :
55.
Lebia scapularis Dejean (not Fourcroy 1785) 1831 : 377. Type locality -
"Amerique septentrionale". LeConte 1848 : 194. LeConte 1863 :
5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 140. Blatchley 1910 : 148. Leng
1920 : 66 [Dianchomena).
Dianchomena scapularis \ Chaudoir 1870 : 52. Horn 1872 : 138.
Le6m /■/aw/mea^a Motschoulsky 1864 : 127. Type locality - "Am[erique]
bor[eale]".
Lebia websteri Casey 1920 : 260. Type locality - Indiana. NEW SYNONYMY.
Csiki 1932 : 1341 { Aphelogenia) .
Description
Length of elytra- 2, 76 - 4. 28 mm; mean (25 specimens) 3. 60 mm.
Head- Frons, clypeus, vertex and genae pale; irons striated on
lateral thirds, central section with distinct microsculpture and a few
fine punctures. Mouth parts pale except for infuscated palpi. Antennae
with segments one to three pale, four to eleven infuscated. Neck strongly
constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc pale with dark vittae (typical pattern as in fig. 27);
epipleura pale. Disc wdth striae distinct, intervals moderately convex;
apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Endophallic armature as in figs. 84, 85; apex of
median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature of 5
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Although showing considerable variation in elytral
pattern solea is readily distinguished from the rest of our Lebia by the
combination of strongly constricted neck, basally widened pronotal mar-
gins, and the frons striated only on the lateral thirds. North of Mexico
the elytral pattern never appears like that of the closely related miranda .
Variation - This species is usually vittate with the dark stripes
separate. Occasionally the dark vittae coalesce, in a few specimens to
such an extent that the elytral disc is almost entirely black.
Synonymy- This species was for a long time called scapularis Dejean
but this is a homonym of scapularis Fourcroy, a European species. Lebia
websteri Casey is a synonym of this species. Casey seems to have over-
looked the strongly constricted neck for he compares websteri to vittata
and there is no mention of the neck in the description. However, the
type of websteri ha.s been examined by G. E. Ball and it is a specimen of
solea .
188
Revision of Lebia
Distribution - Lebia solea is found east of the Rocky Mountains in the
United States and adjacent Canada (fig. 131). Over 650 specimens were
studied from the following localities.
CANADA
MANITOBA - Aweme. NOVA SCOTIA - Yarmouth. ONTARIO - Brittania; Leamington; Marmora; Ottawa; Pelee
Island; Point Pelee; Port Colborne; Prince Edward Co.; Ridgeway; Toronto; Trenton. QUEBEC - Aylmer; Brome.
SASKATCHEWAN - Swift Current.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Pyriton (Clay Co.). ARKANSAS - Hope (Hempstead Co.). COLORADO - Julesburg (Sedgwick Co.); Pin-
arze Park. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Alachua Co.; Enterprise (Volusia Co.); Jackson Co.; Lake Okee-
chobee; Marion Co. ; Paradise Key; Royal Palm State Park (Dade Co.); South Bay (Palm Beach Co.); Winter Park
(Orange Co.). ILLINOIS - Bosky Dell; Bowmanville; Cahokia (Saint Clair Co.); Champaign (Champaign Co. ); Chicago
(Cook Co.); Edgebrook; Forest City (Mason Co.); Galesburg (Knox Co.); Gillespie (Macoupin Co. ); Glencoe (Cook
Co.); Havana (MasonCo.); Kickapoo State Park (Vermilion Co. ); LaSalle Co. ; Moline (Rock Island Co. ) ; Olive Branch
(Alexander Co.); Palos Park (Cook Co.); Urbana (Champaign Co.). INDIANA - Dunes State Park; Gary (Lake Co.);
Hammond (Lake Co.); Knox Co.; Kosciusko Co.; Lafayette (Tippecanoe Co.); Long Lake; Marion Co.; Marshall Co.;
Michigan City (LaPort Co. ) ; Mineral Springs; OgdenDunes; Pine; Posey Co. ; Putnam Co. IOWA - Ames (Story Co.);
Dubuque (Dubuque Co.); Elma (Howard Co.); Herrold (Polk Co.); Iowa City (Johnson Co.); Ruthven (Palo AltoCo.);
Sioux City (Woodbury Co.). KANSAS - Chanute (Neosho Co.); Cheyenne Co.; Decatur Co.; Douglas Co.; Ellsworth
Co.; Franklin Co.; Garden City (Finney Co.); Gove Co.; Madison (Greenwood Co.); Manhattan (Riley Co.); Marion
Co.; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co. ) ; Rawlins Co. ; Reno Co. ; Scott City (Scott Co. ) ; Stockton (Rooks Co. ); Topeka (Shawnee
Co.); Wallace (Wallace Co.); Wellington (Sumner Co.). LOUISIANA. MARYLAND - Cabin John (Montgomery Co.);
Chesapeake Beach (Calvert Co. ); College Park (Prince Georges Co.); Great Falls (Montgomery Co. ) ; Plummers Island;
Travilah. MASSACHUSETTS - Boston (Suffolk Co. ) ; Framingham (Middlesex Co. ) ; Marion (Plymouth Co. ) . MICHIGAN -
Ann Arbor (Washtenaw Co. ); Cheboygan (Cheboygan Co. ) ; Cooper Woods (Oakland Co. ) ; Detroit (Wayne Co.); E. S.
George Reserve (Livingston Co.); Harbert Dunes (Barrien Co.); Higgins Lake (Crawford Co.); High Island (Charlevoix
Co.); Horseshoe Bay (Mackinac Co.); Ingham Co.; Macatawa (Ottawa Co.); Marquette (Marquette Co.); Naubinway
(Mackinac Co.); Port Huron (Saint Clair Co.); Rochester (Oakland Co.); Selfridge Field, Mt. Clemens; Sharon (Wash-
tenaw Co.); South Fox Island (Leelanau Co.); Whitefish Point (Chippewa Co.). MINNESOTA - Crookston (Polk Co.);
Duluth (Saint Louis Co. ); Fillmore Co. ; Goodhue Co. ; Houston Co. ; LeSueur Co. ; Newport (Washington Co. ) ; Norman
Co.; Olmsted Co. ; Saint Anthony Park; Saint Paul (Ramsey Co.); Saint Peter (Nicollet Co. ) ; Yellow Medicine Co.
MISSOURI - Saint Charles (Saint Charles Co.). NEBRASKA - Halsey (Thomas Co.); Kearney (Buffalo Co.); Lincoln
(Lancaster Co.); Sand Hills, Nebraska National Forest (Thomas Co.); West Point (Cuming Co.). NEW HAMPSHIRE -
Cornish; Franconia (Grafton Co. ) ; Hampton (Rockingham Co. ) ; Meredith Center (Belknap Co. ) ; Rumney (Grafton Co. ) .
NEW JERSEY - Arlington (Hudson Co.); Boonton (Morris Co.); Clementon (Camden Co.); Collingswood (Camden Co.);
Merchantville (Camden Co.); Orange (Essex Co.); Phillipsburg (Warren Co. ); Riverton (Burlington Co.); Wenonah
(Gloucester Co. ); Woodbury (Gloucester Co. ) . NEW YORK - Bear Mountain (Rockland Co. ); Buffalo (Erie Co. ); Esopus
(Ulster Co.); Florida (Orange Co.); Fire Island; Hamburg (Erie Co.); Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); New Rochelle (West-
chester Co.); New York City; N. Fairhaven; Oneida Lake; Peekskill (Westchester Co.); Walton (Delaware Co.);
Yaphank (Suffolk Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Lake Junaluska (Haywood Co.); Raleigh (Wake Co.). NORTH DAKOTA -
Bottineau (Bottineau Co.); Leonard (Cass Co.); Wilton (McLean Co.). OHIO - Champaign Co.; Cincinnati (Hamilton
Co.); Cleveland (Cuyahoga Co.); Holmes Co.; Laforte Co.; Lucas Co.; Summit Co. PENNSYLVANIA - Ashbourne;
Avondale (Chester Co. ); Bethlehem (Northampton Co. ) ; Broomall (Delaware Co. ); Camp Hill (Cumberland Co. ); Castle
Rock; Easton (Northampton Co. ) ; Hummelstown (Dauphin Co. ) ; Indian Creek Res. ; Lime Pk. ; Linglestown (Dauphin
Co.); Mt. Moriah; Ohiopyle (Fayette Co. ); Ole Bull; Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co. ) ; Racoon Creek; State College
(Centre Co.); Swarthmore (Delaware Co.); Tinicum (Delaware Co.); Tinicum Island; West View (Allegheny Co. ) ;
Wilkes Barre (Luzerne Co. ); Wyoming (Luzerne Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Clemson (Oconee Co.). SOUTH DAKOTA -
Platte (Charles Mix Co.); Redfield (Spink Co.); Volga (Brookings Co.). TENNESSEE - Allardt (Fentress Co.); Col-
umbus (Maury Co.); Knoxville (Knox Co.). TEXAS - College Station (Brazos Co.); Columbus (Colorado Co.); Forest-
burg (Montague Co.). VERMONT - Burlington (Chittenden Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Falls
Church (Fairfax Co. ); Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co. ); Rosslyn (Arlington Co. ). WEST VIRGINIA - Berkeley Springs
(Morgan Co.); White Sulphur Springs (Greenbrier Co.). WISCONSIN - Bayfield Co.
26- Lebia (Lebia) miranda (Horn)
Dianchomena miranda Horn 1872 : 139. Type locality - Camp Grant, Arizona.
Lebia miranda', Leng 1920: 66 {Dianchomena), Csiki 1932 : 1342 {Dianchomena),
Description
Length of elytra - 3, 08-3. 60 mm; mean (31 specimens) 3,29 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, and genae pale, vertex usually pale but
occasionally darkened; frons and vertex striated. Mouth parts (includ-
ing gula) pale; mentum without a tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck
strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and sometimes very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Typical pattern as in fig. 28; epipleura pale. Elytral
disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately convex; apical pinch well
Madge
189
developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter pale, darkening on apical segment. Pygidium
varying from pale to dark.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 86, 87; apex
of median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature in
four specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Only one other species, solea t has a strongly cons-
tricted neck and wide pronotal margins. From this species miranda can
be distinguished by its elytral pattern and completely striated frons.
Variation - There is little variation in miranda , at least north of
Mexico (see discussion under Relationships below). The lateral spotqn
the elytra is sometimes joined to the dark sutural vitta and the vertex
may show slight traces of dark coloration.
Relationships - North of Mexico miranda is fairly constant in color
pattern. However, it seems very probable that it is only the northern
end of a variable tropical species. 1 have seen specimens from Colombia
{? = rugatifrons Chaudoir) and Mexico (species unknown) which were the
same in genitalic and external morphology but differed in color. In the
Colombian form the head was black and the lateral dark marking of the
elytra was a vitta and not a spot. In the Mexican form the head was pale
and the elytra were as in the Colombian specimens. This suggests a
north-south dine. However, until there is more evidence that the gaps
between the various color forms are bridged I prefer to retain the name
miranda for the Arizona population.
Distribution - North of Mexico this species occurs in Arizona and
Texas (probably western Texas); 37 specimens were studied from the
following localities.
ARIZONA - Globe (Gila Co.); Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.); Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co.); Tuscon
(Pima Co.). TEXAS.
27. Lebia (Lebia) vittata (Fabricius)
Carabus vittatus Fabricius 1776 : 240. Type locality - "in America boreali".
Fabricius 1781 : 311. Fabricius 1787 : 203. Fabricius 1792 :
161. Olivier 1795 : 97. Fabricius 1801 : 202.
Lebia vittata; Say 1825 ; 13. Dejean 1826 : 267. LeConte 1848 : 195.
LeConte 1863 : 5. Motschoulsky 1864 : 227. Gemminger and
Harold 1868: 141. Bates 1883 : 240. Horn 1885:133. Blatchley
1910 ; 148. Casey 1920 : 261. Leng 1920: 66 { Aphelogenia) , Csiki
1932 : 1341 {Aphelogenia) , Blackwelder 1944 : 56.
Aphelogenia vittata; Chaudoir 1871 : 40.
Lebia flavovittata ChevrolSit i83 5 : (5) No. 131. Type locality - "environs de
Mexico". Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 138.
Lebia scapularis (in part - incorrect synonymy with flavovittata); Leng 1920 :
66.
Lebia furcata LeConte 1848 : 193. Type locality - "ad f/i/mcn Platte , et ad Lacum
Superiorem". NEW SYNONYMY. LeConte 1863 : 5.
Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 138. Horn 1885 : 133 (in key).
190
Revision of Lebia
Blatchley 1910 : 148. Casey 1913 : 191. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia) ,
Csiki 1932 : 1340 {Aphelogenia) . Blackwelder 1944 : 54.
Aphelogenia furcata I Chaudoir 1871 : 41. Horn 1872 : 140.
Lebia conjmgens LeConte 1848 : 194. Type locality- ". . . Nov Eboraci. . . ".
Lebia vittata conjungens; LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
141. Leng 1920 : 66. Csiki 1932 ; 1341.
Aphelogenia vittata conjungens; Chaudoir 1871 : 40.
Lebia scapularis (in part - incorrect synonymy with conjungens); Horn 1872 ;
138.
Aphelogenia vittata connecta Cha-udoix 1871 : 41,
Lebia vittata connecta; Csiki 1932 : 1341.
Aphelogenia spraguei Horn 1872 ; 139. Type locality - Texas.
Lebia vittata spraguei ; Horn 1885 : 133. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia). Csiki
1932 : {Aphelogenia) .
Lebia depicta Horn 1885 : 133. Type locality - Montana, NEW SYNONYMY.
Casey 1913 : 191. Leng 1920: 66 {Aphelogenia). Csiki 1932 : 1341
{ Aphelogenia) .
Lebia sonomae Casey 1913: 191. Type locality - California (Mendocino Co.) .
NEW SYNONYMY. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia). Csiki 1932 :
1341 ( Aphelogenia ) .
Lebia debiliceps Casey 1913 : 192. Type locality - Indiana. Leng 1920 :
66 {Aphelogenia), Csiki 1932 : 1340 {Aphelogenia).
Lebia amnicola Casey 1932 : 192. Type locality - Texas (Brownsville).
NEW SYNONYMY. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia). Csiki 1932:
1339 {Aphelogenia) ,
Lebia tempeana Casey 1924 : 92. Type locality - Arizona (Tempe). NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1341. {Aphelogenia).
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 04 - 5. 00 mm; mean (26 specimens) 4, 06 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, vertex and genae pale; frons with micro-
sculpture variable, with scattered fine punctures and a few fine wrinkles
at sides and across vertex. Mouth parts pale except palpi; mentum
without a tooth. Antennae with segment one pale, segments two and
three variable; segments four to eleven- dark but becoming paler api-
cally. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine transverse wrinkles, becoming confused laterally.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc pale with dark vittae (figs. 29, 30) or largely dark
(fig. 31); epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals flat; api-
cal pinch well developed; basal ridge complete.
Legs- Coxae and trochanters pale; femora varying from entirely
dark to dark on distal third only; tibae varying from entirely dark to
dark only at ends; tarsi dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus weakly
bilobed or strongly emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in fig. 88; apex of me-
dian lobe tapered to a narrow point, narrow in lateral view. The endo-
Madge
191
phallic armature in 9 specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition^ The vittate elytra, pale head, and femora dark at
least apically, distinguish vittata from all our species of Lebia except
pectita. From pectita this species is readily separated by its elytral pat-
tern (sutural vitta forked basally) and the complete basal ridge of the
elytra. Those specimens of vittata in which the pale vittae are obliterated
and the furcation of the sutural vitta strongly reduced can be confused
with no other species.
Variation - Lebia vittata varies considerably in both the extent of the
dark markings on the elytra and the amount of dark coloration on the
femora. These two characters seem to vary independently of each other
and will be discussed separately.
Basically the elytral pattern can be divided into two types, each
variable in its elf. In the eastern United States (possibly only in the south-
ern United States with extentions northward along the Atlantic coast and
in the Mississippi Valfey) occurs a small form in which the pale elytral
vittae are very narrow or absent. In the same area and over the rest of
the United States and adjacent Canada is a form which is usually larger
and in which the pale vittae are usually wider. Intergrades occur be-
tween the two. Two possible explanations for this variation may be sug-
gested. First, the small dark form is being replaced by the larger and
paler form. The populations of the small dark form in the east are either
the only ones not yet replaced or this area is the only place where the
older darker form can successfully compete with the new form. Second,
in the east a second host is available. Adults developing at the expense
of this host are modified in size and elytral color expression.
The femora vary in color from predominantly pale with only the
apical third or fourth dark to entirely or predominantly dark. Plotting
geographically the percentage of specimens with the hind femora pre-
dominantly dark (fig. 142; data in Table 2) seems to indicate that the
gene (or genes) for dark femora is spreading from a center of origin in
the northwest (perhaps Montana) and that it is more successful in the
cooler regions. It appears not to have reached the southeast and is rare
in California and Arizona.
Synonymy - The name vittata strictly applies to the dark eastern
form, furcata to the larger, paler form with predominantly pale femora,
depicta to the larger, paler form with entirely dark femora and the four
Caseynames apply to the same form as furcata. The Casey names apply
to variations in the width of the elytral vittae. They are not sharply se-
parated but rather intergrade into each other. L. depicta is considered a
synonym because numerous intermediate types of femoral coloration can
be found between typical depicta and typical furcata. Also, the two forms
are largely sympatric and would be expected to have more than color
differences if they were specifically distinct. L. furcata and L. vittata are
considered conspecific for two reasons. First, intergrades in elytral
coloration can be found and secondly, vittata and furcata in the eastern
United States show the same type of variation in femoral coloration, that
is, both are represented by the pale form in the southeastern U. S. and
192
Revision of Lebia
both have some individuals with dark femora in the northeast.
TABLE 2. Geographic variation in coloration of hind femora of Lehia
vittata.
Distribution ~ Lebia vittata occxxys throughout the United States and
adjacent Canada (fig. 118). Over 550 specimens were studied from the
following localities.
CANADA
ALBERTA ~ Cypress Hills; Edmonton; Laggan; Lethbridge; Medicine Hat; Onefour; Orion; Pincher Creek; IVhitla.
MANITOBA - Aweme; Brandon; Reynolds; Saint Lazare; Winnipeg. ONTARIO - Lanark; London; Point Pelee; Port
Colborne; Port Rowan; Prince Edward Co. SASKATCHEWAN - Atlon's Lake (Cut Knife); Swift Current; Torch River.
UNITED STATES
ARIZONA - Diamond Creek, White Mountains; Fairbank (Cochise Co.); Grand Canyon (Coconino Co.); Oak Creek
Canyon (Coconino Co.); Phoenix (Maricopa Co.); Yuma (Yuma Co.). ARKANSAS. CALIFORNIA - Bartlett Springs
(Lake Co.); Los Angeles (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Mendocino Co.; Modesto (Stanislaus Co. ); Oroville (Butte Co.); Sac-
ramento (Sacramento Co. ) ; San Diego (San Diego Co. ); Yuma. COLORADO - Berkeley; Clear Creek; Glenwood Springs
(Garfield Co. ); Julesburg (Sedgewick Co. ); Masonville ( Larimer Co. ) ; Monte Vista (Rio Grande Co. ) ; Poudre Canyon
(Larimer Co.); Rifle (Garfield Co. ); San Luis Valley. FLORIDA - Crescent City (Putnam Co.); Dunedin (Pinellas
Co.); Gainesville (Alachua Co.); Jacksonville (Duval Co.); Levy Co.; Marion Co.; Sebastian (Indian River Co.); S.
Miami (Dade Co.); Tampa (Millsborough Co.). GEORGIA - Tifton (Tift Co.). IDAHO - Blackfoot (Bingham Co.);
Boise (Ada Co.); Idaho Falls (Bonneville Co. ) ; Mackay (Custer Co. ); Pocatello (Bannock Co. ) ; Rock Creek (Owyhee
Co.); Slate Creek (Idaho Co.). ILLINOIS - Cahokia (Saint Clair Co.); Chicago (Cook Co. ); Homewood (CookCo.);
Jasper Co. INDIANA - Elkhart (Elkhart Co.); LaFayette (Tippecanoe Co.); Lake Station; Mishawaka (Saint Joseph
Co.); Pine; Posey Co.; Vigo Co. KANSAS - Douglas Co.; Meade Co.; Topeka (Shawnee Co.). LOUISIANA - Coving-
ton (Saint Tammany Co. ) ; Tallulah (Madison Co. ) . MAINE - Jonesboro (Washington Co. ); Paris (Oxford Co.); Saco
(York Co.); Wajdoboro (Lincoln Co.). MARYLAND - Nanjemoy (Charles Co.). MASSACHUSETTS - Amherst (Hamp-
shire Co.); Arlington (Middlesex Co.); Canton (Norfolk Co.); Northfield (Franklin Co.); Petersham (Worcester Co.);
Springfield (Hampden Co.); Wollaston. MICHIGAN - Battle Creek (Calhoun Co.); Beaver Isle (Charlevoix Co. ); Big
Madge
193
Rapids (Mecosta Co.); Douglas Lake (Cheboygan Co.); Marquette (Marquette Co.); New Baltimore (Macomb Co.);
Port Austin (Huron Co.); Port Similac (Similac Co. ); Royal Oak (Oakland Co.); Sand Point (Huron Co.). MINNESOTA -
Big Stone Co. Itasca State Park (Clearwater Co.); Laporte (Hubbard Co.); Pine River (Cass Co.); Rock Creek (Chis -
ago Co.); Saint Paul (Ramsey Co.). MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI - Saint Louis (Independent City). MONTANA - Assini-
boine; Bear Paw Mountain (Blaine Co.); Chester (Liberty Co.); Helena (Lewis and Clark Co.); Judith Valley; Rapelje
(Stillwater Co. ). NEBRASKA - Glen (Sioux Co.). NEVADA - Ely (White Pine Co. ) . NEW HAMPSHIRE - Franconia
(Grafton Co.); Mount Surprise, Intervale (Carroll Co.); Mount Washington (Coos Co.); Rumney (Grafton Co.); Three
Mile Island. NEW JERSEY -Anglesea; Clementon (Camden Co. ) ; Collingswood (Camden Co. ) ; Egg Harbor City (Atlantic
Co.); Hillsdale (Bergen Co.); Hopatcong (Sussex Co.); Riverton (Burlington Co.); Woodbury (Gloucester Co.). NEW
MEXICO - Gallina Hot Springs; Porvenir; Ramah (McKinley Co.); San Juan Valley (Taos Co.); Santa Fe (Santa Fe
Co.); Tusas-No Agua (Rio Arriba and Taos Cos .) . NEW YORK - Babylon (Suffolk Co. ) ; Catskill Mountains ; New York
City; Quogue (Suffolk Co. ); Yaphank (Suffolk Co. ) . NORTH CAROLINA - Chapel Hill (Orange Co. ); Raleigh (Wake Co. ) ;
Wendell(Wake Co.). NORTH DAKOTA -Devil's Lake (Ramsey Co.); Williston (Williams Co.). OHIO - Sandusky (Erie
Co.). OREGON - Corvallis (Benton Co.); Kerby (Josephine Co.); Medford (Jackson Co. ) ; Murphy (Josephine Co.);
Rogue River (Jackson Co.). PENNSYLVANIA - Easton (Northampton Co.); Indian Creek Res. ; Lancaster (Lancaster
Co.); Lehigh Gap. SOUTH GAROLINA - Beaufort (Beaufort Co.); Clemson (Oconee Co.); Lexington (Lexington Co.).
SOUTH DAKOTA - Brookings (Brookings Co. ) ; Volga (Brookings Co.). TENNESSEE - Elmwood (Smith Co.). TEXAS -
Brownsville (Cameron Co.); Buckeye (Matagorda Co.); Calvert (Robertson Co.); College Station (Brazos Co.); Col-
umbia; Columbus (Colorado Co.); Hallettsville (Lavaca Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.). UTAH - Emory Co.; Kimball
Junction (Summit Co.); Richfield (Sevier Co.); Utah Lake. VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Fairfax Co.;
Fort Monroe (Elizabeth City Co.). WASHINGTON - Wawawai (Whitman Co.). WISCONSIN - Bayfield (Bayfield Co.);
Worden Township (Clark Co.). WYOMING - Carbon Co.; Cheyenne (Laramie Co.).
28- Lebia (Lebia) histrionica Bates
Lebia histrionica Bates 1883 : 240. Type locality - Mexico, Guatemala.
Schaeffer 1910 : 399. Leng 1920 : 66 (Aphelogenia) . Csiki 1932 :
1340 {Aphelogenia) , Blackwelder 1944 : 54.
Lebia histrionica scutellata Bates 1883 : 241. Type locality - Mexico, Playa
Vicente. NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1340 { Aphelogenia ) .
Blackwelder 1944 ; 54.
Lebia histrionica nigrosignata Bates 1883: 241. Type locality - Mexico, Guana-
juato. NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1340 {Aphelogenia). Black-
welder 1944 : 54.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 00 -4. 00 mm; mean (21 specimens) 3.72 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae pale; frons usually
with distinct microsculpture, with scattered fine punctures and a few
fine wrinkles at sides and across vertex. Mouth parts pale except for
dark palpi; mentum without a tooth. Antennae with segments one to
three pale, four to eleven dark but paler apically. Neck not strongly
constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine, transverse wrinkles becoming confused at sides.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc pale with dark markings (typical pattern as in fig.
32); epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately
convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs - Coxae and trochanters pale; femora largely pale, dark
on distal third; tibiae pale except at ends; tarsi dark. Fourth segment
of hind tarsus emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium entirely pale.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus similar to vittata but slight
reduced; apex of median lobe tapered to a narrow point, narrow in lat-
eral view. The endophallic armature in three specimens was examined.
194
Revision of Lebia
Discussio?i
Recognition - The only other species with a pale head and black-
tipped femora occurring in the range of histrionica north of Mexico is
vittata . The two can easily be separated by their elytral patterns (figs,
29 to 32).
Variation - The basic elytral pattern exhibits considerable varia-
tion. The circumscutellar spot is entire, broken into two along the su-
ture, oris intermediate between these conditions. Similarly the post-
median fascia is entire, or broken into three spots or usually is trilobed.
In some specimens the circumscutellar and postmedian markings are
joined together along the suture.
Synonymy - In addition to the type. Bates at the same time described
four "varieties" lettered a tod. To two of these he referred previous
names which had no nomenclatural validity and thus took their author-
ship. As no distinction between aberrations and subspecies was made
these names must be regarded as subspecific. However, these two named
variants occur with the nominate form in one population. They are
accordingly synonymized.
Distribution - Lebia histrionica is known north of Mexico only in southern
Arizona; 24 specimens were studied from the following localities .
Apache Pass, nr. Bowie (Cochise Co.); Cave Creek Ranch, Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co. ); Huachuca Mountains;
Madera Canyon, Santa Rita Mountains (Santa Cruz Co.); Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Ruby
(Santa Cruz Co. ); Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co. ); Tucson (Pima Co. ).
29. Lebia (Lebia) pectita Horn
Aphelogenia vittata (incorrect identification); Horn 1872 : 140.
Lebia pectita Horn 1885 : 133. Type locality - not given. Leng 1920 : 66
{Aphelogenia). Csiki 1932 : 1341 {Aphelogenia).
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 04 - 3. 88 mm; mean (20 specimens) 3. 48 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae pale; frons usually
with distinct microsculpture, with scattered fine punctures and a few
fine wrinkles at sides and across vertex. Mouth parts pale except for
dark palpi; mentum without a tooth. Antennae with first segment pale,
segments two to eleven dark but becoming paler apically. Neck not
strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest,
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine transverse wrinkles,
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc pale with dark vittae (fig. 33); epipleura pale. Disc
with striae distinct and intervals flat; apical pinch well developed; basal
ridge incomplete.
Legs - Coxae and trochanters pale; femora largely pale, dark on
distal third; tibiae and tarsi dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus weakly
bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium entirely pale.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 89; apex of me-
dian lobe tapered to a narrow point, but rather broad in lateral view.
The endophallic armiature in two specimens was examined.
Madge
195
Discussion
Recognition - The pale head and black- tipped femora separate pectita
from all the other eastern species except vittata. The non-furcate, black,
sutural vitta and the incomplete basal ridge of the elytra of pectita dis-
tinguish these two.
Variation - The width of the elytral vittae is quite constant but in
a few specimens the mesal pale vitta is very narrow. In some speci-
mens the two black vittae on each elytron are joined distally.
Distribution - Lebia pectita is found in the eastern half of the United
States (fig. 121). However, from the specimens at hand it appears to
be rather rare in the midwest. Over 175 specimens were studied from
the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Chickasaw (Mobile Co. ) ; Mobile (Mobile Co.). CONNECTICUT - Lyme (New London Co.). DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA. FLORIDA- Jacksonville (Duval Co.). GEORGIA - Cherokee National Forest; Thomasville (Thomas Co.).
ILLINOIS - Carbondale (Jackson Co.). INDIANA - Posey Co. KANSAS. KENTUCKY - Glasgow (Barren Co.). LOUIS-
IANA - Lake Charles (Calcasieu Co.); Vowells Mill (Natchitoches Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City);
Edgewood (Harford Co. ) . MASSACHUSETTS - Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Cambridge (Middlesex Co. ); Dover (Norfolk
Co.); Duxbury (Plymouth Co.); Medfield (Norfolk Co. ) ; Needham (Norfolk Co. ) ; Springfield (Hampden Co.); Wellesley
(Norfolk Co.). MICHIGAN - Oakland Co. MISSISSIPPI - Beaumont (Perry Co.); Lucedale (George Co.); Natchez
(Adams Co. ) . NEW HAMPSHIRE - East Wakefield (Carroll Co. ) ; Pittsfield (Merrimack Co. ) ; T am worth (Carroll Co. ) .
NEW JERSEY - Atco (Camden Co.); Bergen Co.; Clementon (Camden Co.); Da Costa; Dundee Lake; Egg Harbor City
(Atlantic Co. ) ; Hillsdale (Bergen Co. ); Malaga (Glouc ester Co. ) ; Ocean City (Cape May Co. ) ; Toy Hills. NEW YORK -
Bellport (Suffolk Co. ) ; Melville, L.I.; New York City; Nyack (Rockland Co. ) ; Peekskill (Westchester Co. ) ; Wading
River (Suffolk Co. ): Yaphank (Suffolk Co. ) . NORTH CAROLINA - Raleigh (Wake Co. ) . PENNSYLVANIA - Delaware
Water Gap (Monroe Co.); Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co. ) . RHODE ISLAND - Warwick (Kent Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA.
TEXAS - Columbus (Colorado Co.); Jefferson (Marion Co.); Maud (Bowie Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent
City); Falls Church (Fairfax Co.); Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.); Lucketts (Loudoun Co.).
30. Lebia (Lebia) nigricapitata new species
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Oak Ck. Canyon. VII. 24. 36 Ariz.
Bryant Lot. 109. To be deposited in the California Academy of
Sciences .
Paratypes are from the following localities, all in the California Academy
of Sciences. ARIZONA - Oak Creek Canyon (Coconino Co. ) (eight
males and 17 females); White Mountains (one male).
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 34 - 3. 72 mm; mean (26 specimens) 3 . 49 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae dark (usually black);
frons without distinct microsculpture, with scattered fine punctures,
rugose around anterior supraorbital setae. Mouth parts with labrum,
gula, palpi, and mandibular scrobe dark, the rest more or less pale;
mentum without a tooth. Antennae entirely dark. Neck not strongly
constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine transverse wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc pale with dark vittae (fig. 34); epipleura pale, Ely-
tral disc with striae distinct, intervals flat; apical pinch well devel-
oped; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs - Entirely dark (usually black), somewhat lighter on coxae.
Fourth segment of hind tarsus weakly bilobed.
Abdomen - ‘Venter pale, apical segment fringed with black; py-
gidium pale, tipped with black laterally.
196
Revision of Lebia
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus and apex of median lobe
similar to those of pectita (fig. 89). The endophallic armature in two
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Specimens of this species at first glance appear to be
hivittata or bilineata t the only other black headed vittate species north of
Mexico. The wide pronotal margins, the pale pterothoracic sclerites
and the pale apex of the elytra will distinguish nigrocapitata from these
superficially similar species.
Variation - There is no major variation in the small series of
specimens available for study.
Etymology ~ The name is derived from the Latin adjectives niger -
black - and capitatus - with a head - in reference to the black head of this
species.
Distribution - This species is known only from Arizona; 27 speci-
mens (type material) were studied.
31. Lebia (Lebia) bivittata (Fabricius)
Carabus bivittatus Fabricius 1798 : 59. Type locality - "Habitat in America".
Fabricius 1801 : 203.
Lebia bivittata; LeConte 1863:5. Gemminger and Harold 1868:137. Bates
1883 : 241. Blatchley 1910 : 149. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia) ,
Csiki 1932 : 1339 {Aphelogenia) . Blackwelder 1944 : 53.
Aphelogenia bivittata ; Chaudoir 1871 : 45. Horn 1872 : 141.
Lebia quadrivittata Dejean 1825 : 268. Type locality - "Amerique septentri-
onale". LeConte 1848 : 195.
Dianchomena quadrivittata; Casey 1920 : 263.
Dianchomena aemula Casey 1920 : 263. Type locality - Kansas. NEW SY
NONYMY.
Lebia aemulaC siki 1932 : 1342 {Dianchomena),
Diachomena devincta Casey 1920 : 264. Type locality - Colorado (Boulder
Co.). NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia devincta; Csiki 1932 : 1342 {Dianchomena),
Description
Length of elytra- 2.84- 3.96 mm; mean (24 specimens) 3.56 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (frons usually
black); frons with fine, rather indistinct microsculpture, moderately
coarse punctures, and a few fine wrinkles near eyes. Mouth parts dark
or infuscated except labium and posterior part of gula pale; mentum with-
out a tooth. Antennae with segments one to three more or less pale,
four to eleven dark. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale. Pronotum shaped as in fig. 7, lateral
margins narrow, notwidened basally; disc usually with indistinct micro-
sculpture, fine punctures, and sometimes fine confused wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Mesosternum and pleura pale, metasternum and
pleura dark, scutellum pale.
Elytra - Dark with pc2le vittae (typical pattern as in fig. 35); epi-
pleura dark. Disc with striae weak and broken into spots, intervals flat;
apical pinch small and poorly developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Madge
197
Legs - Coxae and trochanters pale; femora largely dark but with
bases pale; tibiaepale with ends dark, especially distal end; tarsi dark.
Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly emarginate or weakly bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale,
Male genitalia “ Armature of endophallus as in figs. 90, 91; apex
of median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature in
five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- The striped elytra, the narrow pronotal margins and
the entirely pale abdomen combine to distinguish this species from all
our other species. The allopatric bilineata is the most similar species
but the abdomen is dark on the basal half. Lebia nigricapitata is also super-
ficially similar but the pronotal margins are wide and the elytral pat-
tern is somewhat different, the apex being pale instead of dark.
Variation - There seems to be no important variation.
Synonymy - Casey's aemula and devincta are here regarded as synon-
yms of bivittata. A series of specimens quickly reveals that the differ-
ences cited by Casey are only minor variations within bivittata .
Distribution - This species ranges from the eastern United States
west to Arizona (fig. 124). However, it appears to be very rare in the
east. Over 225 specimens were studied from the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ARIZONA - Antelope Peak (Yavapai Co.); Apache (Cochise Co.); Arivaca (Pima Co.); Bowie (Cochise Co.); Canelo;
Carrizo; Continental (Pima Co. ) ; Cortaro (Pima Co. ) ; Douglas (Cochise Co. ) ; Elfrida (Cochise Co. ) ; Flagstaff (Coco-
nino Co.); Fort Grant (Graham Co.); Galiuro Mountains; Globe (Gila Co.); Huachuca Mountains; Nogales (Santa Cruz
Co.); Oracle (Pinal Co.); Palmerlee (Cochise Co.); Patagonia (Santa Cruz Co.); Phoenix (Maricopa Co.); Pinal
Mountains; Prescott (Yavapai Co.); Sahuarita (Pima Co.); San Carlos Lake (Graham Co.); Santa'Rita Mountains;
Sierra Ancha Mountains; Sonoita (Santa Cruz Co.); Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co. ); Tucson(Pima
Co.). ARKANSAS - Washington Co. COLORADO- Colorado Springs (El PasoCo.); Fort Collins (Larimer Co.); Lamar
(Prowers Co.); Pingree Park (Larimer Co.). DELAWARE. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. GEORGIA - Chester (Dodge
Co.). ILLINOIS - Bloomington (McLean Co.); Galesburg (Knox Co.). INDIANA - Marion Co.; Vigo Co. IOWA - Fort
Madison(Lee Co.). KANSAS - Clarendon Siding; Garden City (Finney Co.); Gove Co.; Lawrence (Douglas Co. ) ; Man-
hattan (Riley Co. ) ; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co. ) ; Scott City (Scott Co. ) ; Topeka (Shawnee Co. ) . KENTUCKY. MICHIGAN -
Detroit (Wayne Co.). MISSOURI - Saint Louis (Independent City). NEBRASKA - Culbertson (Hitchcock Co.); Lincoln
(Lancaster Co.); Minden (Kearney Co.). NEW JERSEY - Boonton (Morris Co.); Ocean City (Cape May Co.). NEW
MEXICO- Alma; Amistad (Union Co. ) ; Mesilla (Dona Ana Co. ) ; Santa Fe (Santa Fe Co. ) . NEW YORK - New York City,
Peekskill (Westchester Co. ) . OHIO - Franklin Co. ; Lucas Co. PENNSYLVANIA - Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co. ) .
TEXAS - Beeville (Bee Co.); Chisos Basin. Big Bend National Park; Cypress Mills (? Blanco Co.); Dallas (Dallas
Co.); Davis Mountains; Fort Davis (Jeff Davis Co. ) ; Marfa (Presidio Co. ) ; New Braunfels (Comal Co.); San Diego
(Duval Co.); Sharpsburg; Wades. VIRGINIA - Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.). WISCONSIN.
32. Lebia (Lebia) bilineata Motschoulsky
Lebia bilineata Motschoulsky 1859 : 145. Type locality - Col. Ross, LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 136. Chaudoir 1871 :
82. Leng 1920 : 66 {Aphelogenia) . Csiki 1932 : 1339 {Aphelogenia) .
Aphelogenia bilineata ; Horn 1872 : 141,
Dianchomena bilineata i Casey 1920 : 263.
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 68 - 3. 44 mm; mean (26 specimens) 3. 19 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (frons usually
black); frons with rather indistinct microsculpture, fine punctures, and
a few fine wrinkles near eyes. Mouth parts dark or infuscated except pale
ligula and posterior part of gula; mentum without a tooth. Antennae
with segments one to three more or less infuscated, four to eleven dark.
Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale except for darkened intercoxal process
198
Revision of Lebia
and parts adjacent to mesosternum. Pronotum shaped as in fig. 7, lat-
eral margins narrow, not widened basally; disc usually with indistinct
microsculpture, fine punctures and sometimes fine confused wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum dark.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale vittae (typical pattern as in fig. 36);
epipleura varying from dark to pale. Disc with striae weak and broken
into spots, intervals flat; apical pinch small and poorly developed; basal
ridge incomplete.
Legs - Coxae and trochanters more or less dark (procoxae palest);
femora dark; tibiae pale with ends dark, especially distal ends; tarsi
dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly emarginate or weakly
bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter dark with apical two segments pale. Pygidium
pale.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus similar to bivittata; apex
of median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature in
two specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- The vittate elytra, narrow pronotal margins, and ab-
domen with the basal half dark readily distinguish bilineata . The two.
similar species, bivittata and nigricapitata are both outside of the known
range of bilineata and both have the abdomen with the basal half pale.
Variation - Typically there is only one pale vitta on each elytron.
However, in some pale specimens the epipleuron is lighter in color and
a second, more lateral vitta is present.
Distribution- This species occurs from Oregon and Idaho to south-
ern California (fig. 133); 58 specimens were studied from the following
localities .
CALIFORNIA - Azusa (Los Angeles Co.); Berkeley (Alameda Co.); C.^rmel (Monterey Co.); Carrville (Trinity Co.);
Hullville (Lake Co.); Humboldt Co.; Mokelumne Hill (Calaveras Co.); Monterey (Monterey Co.); Mount Pinos (Kern
Co.); Paraiso Springs (Monterey Co.); Pasadena (Los Angeles Co.); Poway (San Diego Co.); Sanford; San Francisco
(San Francisco Co. ) : Shasta Co. ; Truckee (Nevada Co. ) ; Tulare Co. ; Yreka (Siskiyou Co. ) . IDAHO - Slate Cr. R.S.
(Idaho Co.). NEVADA. OREGON - Medford (Jackson Co.); Tygh Valley (Wasco Co.).
33. Lebia (Lebia) abdominalis Chaudoir
Lebia abdominalis Ch.3MdiOir 1843 : 704. Type locality - unknown. LeConte
1848 : 195. LeConte 1868 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
136. Bates 1883 : 240. Blatchley 1910 : 148. Deng 1920 : 66
(Dianchomena) . Csiki 1932 : 1342 { Dianchomena) . Blackwelder 1944 :
52.
Dianchomena abdominalisl Chaudoir 1871: 47. Horn 1872 : 138. Casey 1920 :
262.
Dianchomena convictor Casey 1920 : 262. Type locality - Illinois (Cairo).
NEW SYNONYMY.
Lebia convictor I Csiki 1932 : 1342 {Dianchomena).
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 52 - 3. 44 mm; mean (26 specimens) 2.98 mm.
Head - Frons and vertex metallic (usually green), clypeus and
genae dark (sometimes slightly metallic); frons with distinct micro-
sculpture, with a few fine punctures, and few fine wrinkles near eyes.
Madge
199
Mouth parts dark or infuscated except for labium; mentum without a
tooth. Antennae with segments one and two, in some specimens three
pale, others infuscated. Neck strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale. Pronotum shaped as in fig. 8, lateral
margins narrow and not widened basally; disc with distinct microscul-
pture and fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Mesosternum pale, metasternum and pleura dark
(metepisternum with a metallic tinge), scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc entirely metallic (usually green); epipleur a usually
dark with a metallic tinge, sometimes infuscated. Disc with striae in-
distinct, intervals flat; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incom-
plete.
Legs- Coxae and trochanters pale; femora largely pale, slightly
infuscated apically; tibiae pale with apical fourth to sixth dark; tarsi
dark. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly emarginate or weakly bi-
lobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in fig. 92; apex of me-
dian lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic armature in three
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition -- This is our only species with both a' strongly cons-
tricted neck and narrow pronotal margins. It is superficially similar in
color to viridipennis but the latter has the pronotal margihs widened bas-
ally.
Variation - There appears to be no major variation in abdominalis*
The elytral disc is usually green, occasionally blue.
Synonymy - Dianchomena convictor Casey is here regarded as a synonym
of abdominalis , The differences cited by Casey in the original description
are considered to be only minor variations and of no taxonomic value.
Distribution’- Lebia abdominalis occurs in the eastern United States
(fig. 119). Over 200 specimens were studied from the following local-
ities.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Mobile (Mobile Co.). ARKANSAS - Convs/ay Co.; Little Rock (Pulaski Co.). FLORIDA - Biscayne Bay
(Dade Co.); Charlotte Harbor (Charlotte Co.); Enterprise (Volusia Co.); Homestead (Dade Co.); Jupiter (Palm Beach
Co.); Lakeland (Polk Co.); Lake Worth (Palm Beach Co.); Moore Haven (Glades Co.). INDIANA - Perry Co.; Posey
Co. KANSAS - Lawrence (Douglas Co.). LOUISIANA - BatonRouge (East Baton Rouge Co.); Gueydan (Vermilion Co.);
Harahan (Jefferson Co.); New Orleans (Orleans Co.); Opelousas (Saint Landry Co.); Rainy Refuge (Vermilion Co.).
MARYLAND - Travilah. MISSOURI. PENNSYLVANIA - Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co. ) . OHIO - Cincinnati (Hamilton
Co.); Oxford (Butler Co.); West Alexandria (Preble Co. ) . TENNESSEE - Nashville (Davidson Co. ) . TEXAS - Alice
(Jim Wells Co.); Brazoria Co.; Brooks Co.; Brownsville (Cameron Co. ) ; Carrizo Springs (Dimmit Co.); Cedar Lane
(Matagorda Co. ) ; Comal Co. ; Corpus Christi (Nueces Co. ); Cypress Mills (? BlancoCo.); Dallas (Dallas Co. ) ; Fedor;
Hidalgo (Hidalgo Co. ) ; Kendall Co. ; Kingsville (Kleberg Co. ) ; Mountain Home (Kerr Co.); New Boston (Bowie Co.);
San Antonio (Bexar Co.); San Diego (Duval Co.); Sharpsburg; Victoria (Victoria Co.). VIRGINIA - Falls Church (Fair-
fax Co.). WEST VIRGINIA - White Sulphur Springs (Greenbrier Co.).
34. Lebia (Lebia) guttula LeConte
Lebia guttula LieConte 4849 : 178. Type locality - "adColorado" . LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 139. Casey 1920 : 259.
Leng 1920 ; 66 { Aphelogenia) , Csiki 1932 : 1340 { Aphelogenia) .
Aphelogenia guttula] Chaudoir 1870 : 44. Horn 1872 : 141.
Lebia me tuens Casey 1920 : 258. Type locality - California. NEW SY-
200
Revision of Lebia
NONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1340 (Aphelogenia) .
Lebia pacifica Casey 1920 : 259. Type locality - California (Lake Co.).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1341 {Aphelogenia),
Description
Length of elytra- 1, 92 - 3. 04 mm; mean (24 specimens) 2. 60 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, and genae varying from pale to dark, cly-
peus pale; frons with confused wrinkles on lateral thirds, center with
variable microsculpture and scattered fine punctures. Mouth parts pale;
mentum without a tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly
constricted.
Prothorax - Pronotal disc and proepisternum varying from dark to
pale (the pronotal disc lighter than the frons and the proepisternum lighter
than pronotal disc), the rest pale. Pronotum transverse in shape, with
lateral margins widened basally; disc with indistinct microsculpture and
fine transverse wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna somewhat darkened when frons is very dark;
metepisterna same color as frons, other pleurites pale; scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc largely pale with dark markings (fig. 37); epipleura
pale. Disc with striae distinct medially, becoming indistinct at sides
and apex; intervals weakly convex; apical pinch well developed; basal
ridge variable, complete or in incomplete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly
emarginate.
Abdomen _ Venter and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 93, 94; apex
of median lobe narrow (fig. 95). The endophallic armature in five speci-
mens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Lebia guttula can he distinguished by its elytral pattern
from all our other species of Lc6/a except dark specimens of abdita . From
this latter species it can be distinguished by its entirely dark abdomen,
smoother frons, and its endophallic armature.
Variation - Color varies considerably in . The color of the
frons, pronotal disc and proepisternum varies from pale to dark. In the
dark forms there is also a distinct dark circumscutellar spot which is
lacking in the paler specimens. The frontal sculpture is also fairly
variable, with the lateral wrinkles fairly strong in some specimens, and
very poorly developed in other specimens.
Synonymy- Casey's metuens and pacifica are here regarded as syno-
nyms of guttula. Both are based on minor characters, metuens on the ely-
tral pattern (lateral spot broadly separate from the sutural spot) and
pacifica on the width of the body and color of the head. Both have a dark
abdomen and head and could not be the related species abdita.
Distribution- This western species ranges from southern British
Columbia to southern California and New Mexico (fig. 134). Over 250
specimens were studied from the following localities.
CANADA
BRITISH COLUMBIA - Basave; Basque; Hope; Lytton; Salmon Arm; Summerland.
Madge
201
UNITED STATES
ARIZONA - Globe (Gila Co. ) ; Montezuma, near Prescott (Yavapai Co. ) ; Peach Springs (Mohave Co.); Phoenix (Maricopa
Co.); SaltRiver; San Simon (Cochis e Co. ) ; Selligman (Yavapai Co. ); Southwest P esearch Station, Portal (Cochise Co. ) ;
Tucson (Pima Co.); Texas Pass, Dragoon Mountains (Cochise Co.); Willcox (Cochise Co.); Winslow (Navajo Co.).
CALIFORNIA - Alhambra Valley (Contra Costa Co.); Amedee; Antioch (Contra Costa Co.); Argus Mountains (Inyo Co.);
Cole; Folsom (Sacramento Co. ) ; Goodale Creek, near Lone Pine (Inyo Co. ) ; F esperia (San Bernardino Co. ) ; Lake Co. ;
Lassen Co. ; Los Gatos (Santa Clara Co.); Merced (Merced Co.); Mohawk (Plumas Co. ) ; Olancha (Inyo Co. ) ; Paraiso
Springs (Monterey Co. ) ; Pasadena (Los Angeles Co. ) ; Patterson (Stanislaus Co. ) ; Poway (San Diego Co. ) ; Saint Helena
(Napa Co.); San Jose (Santa Clara Co.); Santa Monica (Los Angeles Co.); Sobre Vista (Sonoma Co.); Vine Hill (Contra
Costa Co.). COLORADO - Durango (La Plata Co.); La Posta; Steamboat Springs (Routt Co.). IDAHO - Dixie (Elmore
Co.); Indian Cove (Owyhee Co.); Jerome (Jerome Co.); Moscow (Latah Co. ) ; Mountain Home (Elmore Co.); Parma
(Canyon Co.); Pegina (Ada Co.); Tuttle (Gooding Co.). KANSAS. MONTANA - Missoula (Missoula Co.); Ravalli Co.
NEVADA - Eureka (Eureka Co.); Reno (Washoe Co.). NEW MEXICO - Alamogordo (Otero Co.); Jemez Mountains;
Silver City (Grant Co.); Thornton; White Sands (Dona Ana Co.). OREGON - Baker (Baker Co.); Fremont National
Forest (Klamath Co. ) ; Grants Pass (Josephine Co. ); Harney Co. ; HoodPiver (Hood River Co. ) ; Huntington (Baker
Co.); Klamath Falls (Klamath Co.); McMinnville (Yamhill Co.); Medford (Jackson Co.); Portland (Multnomah Co.);
Salem (Marion Co.); Salmon Piver; Talent (Jackson Co. ) ; TumaloState Park (Deschutes Co.); Weston (Umatilla Co.);
Wildwood, Ochoco National Forest (Wheeler Co. ). UTAH - American Fork Canyon; Buckek Valley (Iron Co. ); Chad's
Ranch; Iron Springs; Leeds (Washington Co.); Parowan (Iron Co.); Richfield (Sevier Co.); Saint George (Washington
Co.); Wildcat Valley (Beaver Co.). WASHINGTON - Cherry (Spokane Co.); Palouse (Whitman Co.); Ritzville (Adams
Co.); Toppenish (Yakima Co.). WYOMING - Green River (Sweetwater Co.).
35- Lebia (Lebia) abdita new species
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Pena Blanca, Sta. Cruz Co,
Ariz. 4000 ' Aug. 27. 60 at light G. E , Ball family and R. B . Madge.
To be deposited in the Canadian National Collection.
Paratypes are from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Baboquivari Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co. ) (one male, California Academy of Sciences) ; Brown's
Canyon, Baboquivari Mountains (Pima Co.) (four males and two females. Museum of Comparative Zoology); Elfrida
(Cochise Co.) (one male. University of Arizona); Elkhorn Ranch, east slope of north end of Baboquivari Mountains (Pima
Co.) (one female, California Academy of Sciences); Hot Springs (one male. United States National Museum); Kansas
Settlement (Cochise Co.) (one female. University of Arizona); Oracle, 14 m E. (PinalCo.) (one male and four females,
California Academy of Sciences); Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument (Pima Co. ) (one female. University of Arizona);
Pena Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.) (five males and three females, personal collection of G. E. Ball, University of Alberta);
Sabino Canyon, Santa Catalina Mountains (Pima Co. ) (two males , University of Arizona) ; San Pedro River , near Palominas
(Cochise Co.) (one female, personal collection of G. E, Ball, University of Alberta); Tucson (Pima Co.) (one female,
California Academy of Sciences; one male. United States National Museum; one male; University of Arizona).
Description
Length of elytra - 2 . 08 - 2 . 48 mm; mean (22 specimens) 2.30 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons striated at
sides, usually striated or rugose at the center. Mouth parts pale; men-
tum without a tooth. Antennae pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale except for infus-
cated metepisternum.
Elytra-- Disc largelypale with darkmarkings (darkest specimens
as in fig. 37); epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct medially, be-
coming indistinct at sides and apex; intervals weakly convex; apical
pinch well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus strongly
emarginate.
Abdomen - Venter pale medially, infuscated or dark laterally and
apically. Pygidium infuscated or dark.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 96, 97; apex
of median lobe narrow as in guttula. The endophallic armature in four
specimens was examined.
Recognition
Dark specimens of
abdita may be confused with speci-
Discussion
202
Revision of Lebia
mens oi guttula , pale specimens with, subrugos a or perpallida. The differences
between guttula and abdita have already been pointed out under the former
species. The rugose frons, infuscated metepisternum, and the abdomen
darkened at the sides will distinguish abdita from subrugosa and perpallida.
In addition subrugosa has a well developed dark circumscutellar marking,
usually lacking in abdita, and perpa///da lacks any dark lateral markings
on the elytra (usually present in abdita).
Variation - I have encountered no marked variation in the small
series of specimens available for study. Some of the darkest specimens
have the dark apical marking present but even in these this marking is
rather faint.
Relationships - Lebia abdita is similar to but quite distinct from guttula.
Their ranges overlap in southern Arizona and probably in northern Mex-
ico,
Etymology - The name is derived from the Latin adjective abditus -
hidden, concealed - in reference to this species being previously confused
with the similar guttula.
Distribution - North of Mexico this species occurs only in southern
Arizona. I have also seen specimens from Baja California; 32 speci-
mens (type material) were studied.
36- Lebia (Lebia) insulata new species
Lebia rho dope (not Bates); Casey 1920 : 258. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia).
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Esper. [anza] Ranch Brownsville
Tex. 6. 14 Liebeck Collection. Deposited in the Museum of Com-
parative Zoology at Harvard University.
Paratypes are all from Brownsville, Texas (some Esperanza Ranch,
Brownsville, Texas) except two in the United States National Mu-
seum which lack any locality data. They are deposited in the
following institutions. American Museum of Natural History
(one male); California Academy of Sciences (two males and three
females); Chicago Natural History Museum (two females) ; Cor-
nell University (three females, one of which is damaged by mu-
seum pests); Museum of Comparative Zoology (two males); Un-
ited States National Museum (one male and five females).
Description
Length of elytra - 3.32 - 3. 84 mm; mean (18 specimens) 3. 63 mm.
Head- Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons with fine
microsculpture. Mouth parts pale; mentum without a tooth. Antennae
entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (fig. 38); epipleura pale.
Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately convex; apical pinch well
developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Madge
203
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 98, 99; apex
of median lobe tapered to a narrow point. The endophallic arma,ture in
four specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Lebia insulata is easily recognized by its elytral pattern.
The only other species in which the pattern is similar (especially in the
shape of the pale apical marking of the elytra) are fuscata and subrugosa^
both allopatric to insulata. The elytral pattern of the present species dif-
fers from both of these species in the shape of the pale basal spot (el-
liptical and not reaching the base of the elytra in insulata , and a distorted
tear drop shape reaching the base in fuscata and subrugosa) and by its lack
of a tooth on the mentum.
Variation - There appears to be no marked variation in insulata.
Notes- This species, although known to previous workers, ap-
parently is without a valid name. It has been called rhodope Bates but
from the shape of the basal pale spot of the elytra and the lack of a tooth
on the mentum it is obviously not Bates' species.
Etymology - The name is derived from the Latin adjective insulatus -
made into an island, insulated - in reference to the pale basal spots of
the elytra being entirely surrounded by dark coloration.
Distribution- Lebia insulata is known only from southeastern Texas;
20 specimens (type material) were studied.
37- Lebia (Lebia) fuscata Dejean
Lebia fuscata 'Dejea.n ±825 : 270. Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale ".
LeConte 1848 : 194. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold
1868 : 138. Chaudoir 1870 : 230. Horn 1872 : 137. Blatchley
1910 : 147. Casey 1920 : 258. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki
1932 : 1329 {Lebia).
Lebia canonica Ca.sey ±920 : 251 . Type locality - Lake Superior (Marquette)
and Rhode Island (Boston Neck). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 :
1340 { Aphelogenia) .
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 60 - 5. 40 mm; mean (26 specimens) 3. 96 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae infuscated or dark;
frons with distinct microsculpture and sometimes a few fine wrinkles near
eyes. Mouth parts pale; mentum with a tooth. Antennae entirely pale
or with segments four to eleven slightly infuscated. Neck not strongly
constricted.
Prothorax - Pale, infuscated on disc (darkest at center of each
discal half) and center of episternum. Disc with distinct microsculp-
ture and fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (typical pattern as in fig.
39); epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately
convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
204
Revision of Lebia
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 100, 101; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
seven specimxens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Within its range Lebia fuscata most closely resembles
ornata . From ornata , fuscata ca.n be distinguished by its complete basal
ridge to the elytra and by the shape of the pale apical marking of the
elytra. Lebia insulata and subrugosa have the pale apical spot of the elytra
shaped similarly but are allopatric to fuscata.
Variation - There is considerable variation in size and some in
color in fuscata. In most specimens the dark post median fascia is wide
but in many of the larger individuals it is reduced or entirely absent.
Both the size and color variants are connected by intermediates.
Synonymy - The name fuscata Dejean strictly applies to the large
specimens lacking the dark post median fascia. The common form with
this fascia broad was named canonica by Casey. As pointed out above the
two forms are connected by intermediates. As the endophallic armature
in the two forms is the same and there are no other differences besides
color I regard the two as being conspecific.
Distribution - This species is probably transcontinental across the
northern United States and adjacent Canada with extensions south along
the west coast to central California, and in the east to the gulf coast (fig.
127). The single record from the prairie region of the northern United
States and adjacent Canada may be evidence of insufficient collecting in
this area or it may indicate that fuscata is rare in this part of its range.
A third pos sibility is that the record is erroneous and that the west coast
population is disjunct from that in the east. Over 625 specimens were
studied from the following localities.
CANADA
BRITISH COLUMBIA - Bowser; Courtney; Langley; Robson; Saanich; Wellington. NOVA SCOTIA - Kentville; Kedge-
makooge Lake; Port au Pique; Truro. ONTARIO - Britannia; Emo; Hastings Co.; Leamington; Marmora; Mer Bleue;
Port Colborne; Prince Edward Co.; Sudbury; Tilsonburg; Toronto; Trenton. QUEBEC - Aylmer; Brome; Covey
Hill; Duchesnay; Duparquet; Kazubazua; Laniel; Montreal; Saint Hilaire; Wakefield.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Tuscaloosa (Tuscaloosa Co.). CALIFORNIA - Ben Lomond (Santa Cruz Co.); Bullrun Flat, Garberville
(Humboldt Co. ) ; Carrville (Trinity Co. ) ; Castle C rag (Shasta Co. ) ; Guerneville (Sonoma Co .) ; Lagunitas (Marin Co. ) ;
Scotia (Humboldt Co. ) . CONNECTICUT - Cornwall (Litchfield Co.); Litchfield ( Litchfield Co. ) ; New Canaan (Fairfield
Co.); Storrs (Tolland Co.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Belleair (Pinellas Co.); Dunedin (Pinellas Co.);
Fort Lauderdale (Broward Co.); Jacksonville (Duval Co.); Mayport (Duval Co.); Oneco (Manatee Co.); Paradise Key,
Everglades National Park; Putnam Co. GEORGIA - Savannah (Chatham Co.). ILLINOIS - Bowmanville; Edgebrook
(Cook Co.); Galesburg (Knox Co. ) ; Kickapoo State Park (Ve rmilion Co. ) ; Palos Park (Cook Co. ) ; Peoria (Peoria Co. ) ;
Riverside (Cook Co.); Willow Springs (Cook Co.). INDIANA - Hammond (Lake Co.); Marion Co. ; Michigan City (La
Porte Co.); Mineral Springs; Pine. IOWA - Ames (Story Co.); Council Bluffs (Pottawattamie C o. ) ; lowaCity (Johnson
Co.); Lake Okoboji (Dickinson Co.). KANSAS - Douglas Co.; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co.); Riley Co.; Topeka (Shawnee
Co. ) . LOUISIANA - New Orleans (Orleans Co.). MAINE - Bethel (Oxford Co. ) ; Passadumkeag (Penobscot Co.); Sals-
bury Cove (Hancock Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City); Chalk Point; Piney Point (Saint Marys Co.);
Sparrows Point (Baltimore Co.). MASSACHUSETTS - Amherst (Hampshire Co. ) ; Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Framingham
(Middlesex Co.); Holliston (Middlesex Co.); Humarock (Plymouth Co.); Lenox (Berkshire Co.); Lexington (Middlesex
Co.); Marion (Plymouth Co.); Nahant (Essex Co.); Natick (Middlesex Co.); Petersham (Worchester Co.); Sharon
(Norfolk Co. ); Tyngsboro (Middlesex Co. ). MICHIGAN - Ann Arbor (Washtenaw Co. ); Beaver Island (Charlevoix Co. );
Charlevoix (Charlevoix Co.); Cross Village (Emmer Co.); Detroit (Wayne Co.); Farmington (Oakland Co.); Five Mile
Point (Keweenaw Co.); Floodwood (Schoolcraft Co.); George Reserve (Livingston Co.); Gull Island (Charlevoix Co.);
Harbert Dunes (Barrien Co. ); Huron Mountains Club (Marquette Co. ) ; Ingham Co. ; Isle P oyal (Keweenaw Co. ) ; Luzerne
(Oscoda Co.); Marquette (Marquette Co. ) ; Pigeon (Huron Co. ) ; Port Huron (Saint Clair Co. ) ; R ochester (Oakland Co. );
Saint Ignace (Mackinac Co.); Southfield (Oakland Co.). MINNESOTA - Battle Creek (Pamsey Co.); Ely (Saint Louis
Co. ); Hennepin Co. ; Houston Co. ; Itasca State Park (Clearwater Co. ); Olmsted Co. ; Saint Paul (Ramsey Co. ); Two
Harbors (Lake Co.). MONTANA - Bear Paw Mountain (Blaine Co.). NEBRASKA - Omaha (Douglas Co.); West Point
(Cuming Co.). NEW HAMPSHIRE - Durham (.Strafford Co. ) ; Franconia (Grafton Co. ) ; Hampton (Rockingham Co.); Lake
of Clouds, Mount Washington (Coos Co.); Meredith Centre (Belknap Co.); Milton (Strafford Co.); Plymouth (Grafton
Co.); Randolph (Coos Co.); Rumney (Grafton Co. ) ; Squam Lake; White Mountains. NEW JERSEY - Arlington (Hudson
Co.); Atlantic City (Atlantic Co. ) ; Bergenfield (Bergen Co. ) ; Burlington Co. ; Chester (Morris Co.); Fort Lee (Bergen
Co.); Greenwood Lake; Hillsdale ( Be rgen Co. ) ; 1 rvington (Essex Co. ) ; Lakehur st (Oc ean Co . ) ; Manasquan (Monmouth
Madge
205
Co.); Ocean City (Cape May Co.); Palisades; Phillipsburg (Warren Co.); Pocono Lake; Roselle Park (Union Co.);
Seaside Park (Ocean Co.). NEW YORK - Batavia (Genesee Co.); Bear Mountain (Rockland Co.); Branchport (Yates
Co.); Buffalo (Erie Co.); Catskill Mountains; Chateaugay Lake, Adirondack Mountains; East Aurora (Erie Co.); El-
bridge (Onondaga Co. ); Freeville (Tompkins Co. ) ; Ghent (Columbia Co. ) ; Hamburg (Erie Co.); Irving (Chautauqua
Co.); Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); Lockport (Niagara Co.); Mendon (Monroe Co.); Mendon Ponds (Wayne Co.); Newport
(Herkimer Co.); New Rochelle (Westchester Co.); New York City; Ocean Beach, Fire Island (Suffolk Co. ) ; Olcott
(Niagara Co.); Oneida Lake; Stow (Chautauqua Co.); Tuxedo Park (Orange Co.); Upper Saranac Lake (Franklin Co.);
Wanakena (Saint Lawrence Co.); Wyandanch (Suffolk Co. ) . OHIO - Allen Co.; Buckeye Lake; Cincinnati (Hamilton
Co.); Cleveland (Cuyahoga Co.); Logan Co.; Putnam Co.; Sandusky Co. PENNSYLVANIA - Avondale (Chester Co.);
Black Moshannon (Centre Co.); Buck Hill Falls (Monroe Co.); Easton (Northampton Co. ) ; Hazelton (Luzerne Co. );
Hummelstown (Dauphin Co. ); Indian Creek Res. ; Martinsburg (Blair Co. ) ; Nanticoke ( Luzerne Co. ) ; Ohiopyle (Fayette
Co.); Ole Bull; Phillipsburg (Centre Co.); Pittsburgh (Allegheny Co. ) ; Shingletown (Centre Co.); State College (C entre
Co.); Tannersville (Monroe Co.); Williamsport (Lycoming Co.); Windgap (Northampton Co.). RHODE ISLAND -
Warwick (Kent Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Blackville (Barnwell Co.). TENNESSEE - Unicoi Co. TEXAS - Carthage
(Panola Co.). VERMONT - Burlington (Chittenden Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Blacksburg (Mont-
gomery Co.); Fairfax Co. ; Nelson Co. WASHINGTON - Factoria (King Co. ) ; Monroe (Snohomish Co. ) ; Orting (Pierce
Co.); Puyallup (Pierce Co. ) ; Seattle (KingCo.); Spillman Camp (Mason Co. ) ; Tenino (Thurston Co. ) . WEST VIP^GINIA -
Wardensville (Hardy Co.). WISCONSIN - Bayfield (Bayfield Co.).
38- Lebia (Lebia) subrugosa Chaudoir
Lebia subrugosa Chaudoir 1870 : 227. Type locality - "Mexique", Bates
1883 : 230. Csiki 1932 : 1338 {Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 55.
Description
Length of elytra - 3. 12 - 4. 00 mm; mean (21 specimens) 3.71mm.
Head” Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae usually pale, frons
sometimes infuscated; frons lacking distinct microsculpture, with a
strong groove along mesal margin of eye, weaker wrinkles mesad of
this and scattered fine punctures. Mouth parts pale; mentum with a
tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Usually entirely pale, sometimes pronotal disc in-
fuscated, lateral margins of pronotum palest. Pronotum transverse in
shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc strongly wrinkled.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (fig. 40); epipleura pale.
Disc with striae distinct, intervals moderately convex; apical pinch
well developed; basal ridge usually complete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter pale, darkest apically. Pygidium infuscated.
Male genitalia ” Armature of endophallus as in figs. 102, 103; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
six specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Lebia subrugosa can usually be distinguished from the
other pale species occurring in the southwestern United States by the
lateral dark vitta on the elytra. Specimens with this vitta reduced to a
post median spot resemble specimens of abdita . However, is smal-
ler and lacks a well defined dark circumscutellar marking. Lebia guttula
and perpallida are also largely pale species but guttula has the apex of the
elytra dark and perpallida lacks lateral dark markings on the elytra.
Variation - North of Mexico subrugosa varies slightly. Some speci-
mens lack the anterior part of the lateral vitta. Also, the connection
between the lateral vitta and the postmedian sutural spot of the elytral
disc, although always present is poorly developed in some specimens.
Thehead and pronotum are usually pale but are infuscated in some speci-
mens .
206
Revision of Lebia
In Mexico there is further variation. I have seen specimens
which are much larger, with the frons and pronotal disc darker, the
frons more wrinkled, and the elytra lacking the dark fascia connecting
the lateral vitta to the dark postmedian sutural spot. This variation
seems to be analogous to that found in Lebia fuscata.
Motes - As the variation known to occur in the present species
covers all the features mentioned in the description of subrugosa I have
used this name. Two forms later described by Bates, rhodope and rufilia,
possibly belong with subrugosa also.
Distribution - North of Mexico Lebia subrugosa occurs in southern Ar-
izonaand western Texas; 31 specimens were studied from the following
localities.
ARIZONA - Ash Fork; Bisbee (Cochise Co.); Chiricahua Mountains; Gilman Ranch, Mule Mountains (Cochise Co.);
Kansas Settlement (Cochise Co.); Southwest Research Station, Portal (Cochise Co.). TEXAS - Terlingua (Brewster
Co.).
39. Lebia (Lebia) perpallida new species
Holotype - A male labelled as follows: Pena Blanca, Sta. Cruz Co.
Ariz. 4000' Aug. 27. 60 at light G. E, Ball family and R. B. Madge
collectors. To be deposited in the Canadian National Collection,
Ottawa.
Paratypes are from the following localities.
ARIZONA - Nogales (Santa Cruz Co.) (one female, California Academy of Sciences); Pel?a Blanca (Santa Cruz Co.) (one
male and one female, personal collection of G. E. Ball, University of Alberta); Stuart Forest Camp, Cave Creek Canyon,
Chiricahua Mountains (Cochise Co.) (one male, Chicago Natural History Museum).
Deseription
Length of elytra - 2.88 - 3.64 mm; mean (5 specimens) 3.45 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons with dis-
tinct microsculpture and a few fine punctures. Mouth parts pale; men-
tum with a tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Necknot strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc largely pale with variable dark sutural markings
(reduced pattern as in fig. 41); epipleura pale. Disc with striae dis-
tinct, moderately convex; apical pinch well developed; basaL ridge us-
ually complete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter pale, darkest apically. Pygidium infuscated.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in figs. 104, 105; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
two specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - This very pale species may be confused with three
other pale species, guttula , abdita , and subrogosa, which occur within its
range. There is usually a dark lateral marking on the elytra in these
three but never in perpallida.
Variation - The postmedian sutural spot varies from a "V" shaped
Madge
207
marking (fig. 41) to a solid diamond. Specimens exhibiting the latter
condition also exhibit a weak circumscutellar spot.
Etymology - The name is derived from the Latin adjective perpallidus -
very pale - in reference to the predominantly pale coloration.
Distribution - Lebia perpallida is known only from southern Arizona.
Five specimens (type material) were studied.
40. Lebia (Lebia) lobulata LeConte
Lebia lobulata LeConte 1863a: 5. Type locality - Ohio or Louisiana. Gem-
minger and Harold 1868 : 139. Horn 1872 : 135. Blatchley 1910 :
146. Casey 1920 : 254. Leng 1920 : 55 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 :
1329 ( Lebia) .
Description
Length of elytra - 1. 96 - 2. 56 mm; mean (21 specimens) 2. 28 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (usually dark
brown); frons with distinct microsculpture and strong punctures . Mouth
parts pale except for dark gula; mentum with a tooth. Antennae entirely
pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Pale except for dark pronotal disc and infuscated epi-
sternum. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened bas-
ally; disc with distinct microsculpture and fine transverse wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Typical pattern as in fig. 42; epipleura pale. Elytral
disc with striae distinct, intervals weakly convex; apical pinch well de-
veloped; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 106, 107; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
four specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - Lebia lobulata can be readily recognized by its strong
frontal punctation. The only other species with similar punctation are
divisa and pulchella, but both of these have the pronotum pale and the elytra
are at least partly metallic. The elytral pattern, when fully developed,
facilitates separation of lobulata from the similar ornata and fuscata, Lebia
analis sometimes has a similar pattern but again the pronotum is pale.
Variation- Some specimens from Floridahave the pale basalmar-
king of the elytra somewhat modified. In these the pale mesal lobe is
reduced but around the shoulder the pale spot is expanded so that the
usual dark markings are obliterated. Although the pattern of variation
is the opposite of what would be expected no genitalic or other differences
were found. This variation, although apparently very localized, is sim-
ilar to the type found in pulchella ; Arizona specimens of the latter species
have the posterior half of the elytra darker but the base paler than in
eastern specimens.
Distribution- Lebia lobulata occur s in the eastern United States (fig.
135). It is doubtful if it occurs in adjacent Canada. Over 150 specimens
208
Revision of Lebia
were studied from the following localities.
UNITED STATES
ARKANSAS. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Enterprise (Volusia Co.); Gainesville
(Alachua Co.); Marion. GEORGIA - Kennesaw Mountain (Cobb Co.). ILLINOIS - Gillespie (Macoupin Co.); Kickapoo
State Park (Vermilion Co. ) ; Saint Clair Co. ; Starved Rock State Park (LaSalle Co. ) . INDIANA - C rawford Co. ; Marion
Co. KANSAS - Riley Co. MARYLAND - Bowie (Prince Georges Co.); Cabin John (Montgomery Co.); Great Falls
(Montgomery Co. ) ; Jackson's L. ; Plummers Island; Popes Creek (Charles Co.). MISSISSIPPI - Lucedale (George
Co.). MISSOURI - Columbia (Boone Co.); Saint Charles (Saint Charles Co.). NEW JERSEY - Chester (Morris Co.);
Stanhope (Sussex Co.); Towaco (Morris Co.). NEW YORK - Bear Mountain (Rockland Co.); New York City; Peekskill
(Westchester Co.); West Point (Orange Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Highlands (Macon Co.); White Lake (Bladen Co.).
OHIO - Champaign Co.; Cincinnati (Hamilton Co.). PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny Co.; Areola (Montgomery Co.);
Lancaster (Lancaster Co.); Lime Pk. SOUTH CAROLINA - Clemson (Oconee Co.). TENNESSEE - Elmwood (Smith
Co.). TEXAS - Beaumont (Jefferson Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Great
Falls (Fairfax Co.); Loudoun Co.; Rosslyn (Arlington Co.); Warm Springs (Bath Co.). WEST VIRGINIA - Fairmont
(Marion Co. ) .
41. Lebia (Lebia) ornata Say
Lebia ornata Say 1825 : 13. Type locality - not given. LeConte 1848 : 194.
LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 139. Chaudoir
1870:198. Horn 1872 : 136. Blatchley 1910 : 146. Casey 1920:
254. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 ( Lebia).
Lebia analis (in part - incorrect synonymy with ornata); Dejean 1826:. 4-52,
Lebia axillaris Dejean 1831 : 372. Type locality - "Amerique septentri-
onale". LeConte 1848 : 194. LeConte 1863 : 5.
Lebia analis (in part - incorrect synonymy with axillaris); Chaudoir 1870 :
211. Blackwelder 1944 : 52.
Lebia mar ginella Dejean 1831 : 373. Type locality - "Amerique septenti-
onale".
Lebia ornata mar ginella ; LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
140. Chaudoir 1870 : 198. Horn 1872 : 136.
Lebia nigripennis DejeSin 1831 : 373. Type locality - "Amerique septentri-
onale". NEW SYNONYMY. LeConte 1848^: 195. Chaudoir 1870 :
200.
Lebia collaris nigripennis; LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
137.
Lebia collaris (in part - incorrect synonymy with nigripennis); Horn 1872 : 136.
Leng 1920 : 66 { Lebia) • Csiki 1932 : 1328 [Lebia). Blackwelder
1944 : 53.
Lebia nigripennis erythroceph ala ~Deiea.n 1831 : 373. Type locality - "Amerique
s eptentrionale ' ' .
Dromius apicalis Haldeman 1843 : 298. Type locality - not given.
Lebia bruimea Haldeman 1843 : 298. Type locality - not given.
Lebia axillaris brunnea; LeConte 1848 : 194. Gemminger and Harold 1868 :
137.
Lc5/a /'r/g/cfo Chaudoir 1879 : 242. Type locality - Boston. Horn 1872 :
137.
Lebia fuscata{in part - incorrect synonymy with frigida); Leng 1920 : 66
{Lebia) Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia)-
Lebia reperta Casey 1920 : 255. Type locality - New York. NEW SYNO-
NYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1341 { Aphelogenia) .
Lebia virginica Casey 1920 : 255. Type locality - Virginia. Csiki 1932 :
1341 ( Aphelogenia) .
Lebia virginiea ashevillensisCasey 1920 : 256. Type locality - North Carolina
(Asheville). Csiki 1932 : 1341 {Aphelogenia) .
Lebia fhwiatilisCasey 1920 : 256. Type locality - Mississippi (Vicksburg)
Madge
209
and Illinois. NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1340 {Aphelogenia) .
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 28 - 3. 20 mm; mean (20 specimens) 2. 66 mm.
Head- Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark; frons with fine
distinct microsculpture and scattered very fine punctures. Mouth parts
pale or infuscated except dark gula; mentum with a tooth. Antennae
entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale or with disc of pronotumand episternum
darkened to various degrees. Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral
margins widened basally; disc with indistinct microsculpture and fine
transverse wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (figs. 43-45) or entirely
dark; epipleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals weakly con-
vex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark or pale.
Male genitalia ~ Armature of endophallus as in fig. 108; apex of
median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in eight
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- There are several species within its geographical
range with which Lebia ornata can be confused. From fuscata pale-marked
ornata can be recognized by the shape of the pale apical marking of the
elytral disc (figs. 43, 44, 45 cf. fig. 39) and the incomplete basal ridge
of the elytra. Specimens of ornata with an entirely dark elytral disc can
be distinguished from collaris by the oblongum cell of the wing (entirely
absent in ornata, a triangular remnant in collaris). From esurialis , ornata
is best distinguished by the endophallic armature although there are
slight differences in the elytral pattern. For a discussion of these see
Lebia esurialis . Lebia lobulata is also somewhat similar but the frons is stron-
gly punctured and the shape of the pale basal spot is quite different.
Variation - There is considerable variation in color in ornata. The
pronotal disc inmost northern specimens is dark although in a few speci-
mens it is partly pale. This region of dark specimens is roughly across
the northern states from Minnesota to New York and south along the
Appalachians. In the southern regions most specimens have the pronotal
disc pale with only a few having it dark. In a similar geographic pattern
the abdomen in northern specimens is usually dark while in southern
specimens it is pale. The maculation of the elytral disc also varies
considerably. In northern specimens the pale markings are usually small
with the basal pale spot usually separated from the base and side of the
disc by dark coloration. In the more southern specimens the pale mar-
kings are enlarged so that the basal spot reaches the base and the sides
of the elytral disc. This more or less corresponds to the type of vari-
ation found in the color of the pronotal disc and the abdomen. However,
from Georgia to Mississippia different type of elytral coloration is also
present in the populations . In these areas many specimens have the pale
210
Revision of Lebia
elytral markings strongly reduced or absent although the pronotum and
the abdomen remain pale. In addition to this color variation there is a
north- south variation in the prominence of the eyes, northern specimens
having less bulging eyes than southern specimens.
Synonymy - In spite of the considerable color variation there seems
to be only one species involved here. The very distinctive endophallic
armature is the same throughout the various forms, and the color var-
iants intergrade.
I do not agree with Lindroth (1955) who considered axillaris (the
southern form with the pale pronotum and more prominent eyes) distinct
from ornata. Lehia frigida Cha.udoir , judging from Chaudoir's illustration
of the elytral pattern, is almost certainly this species as was recognized
by Casey (1920). Lebia nigripennis , usually synonym! zed with Lebia collaris ,
appears to be the dark form of this species. Two characters mentioned
by Dejean in the original description of nigripennis , the small size and the
reddish head, indicate that it does not belong with collaris but rather with
ornata . Both. Chaudoir (1863, 1870) and Lindroth (1955) considered the
type of nigripennis to be not conspecific with collaris .
Casey's reperta, virginica , virginica ashevillensis , and fluviatilis 3-re re-
garded as synonyms of ornata . The types have been compared by G. E.
Ball with specimens here regarded as ornata. These could not be the
similar appearing fuscata either because of the flattened eyes ( reperta) or
because of the shape of the pale apical spot (widest suturally in virginica ,
V. ashevillensis 3ind fluviatilis) . As these forms do not occur in Texas they
could not be esurialis or calliope .
Distribution - This species occurs in the eastern half of the United
States and adjacent Canada (fig. 128). Over 900 specimens were studied
from the following localities.
CANADA
ONTARIO - Bells Corners; Constance Bay; Fisher Glen; Go Home Bay; Gull Lake; Jarvis Lake; Leamington; Mar-
mora; Toronto; White Lake. QUEBEC - Brome; Gracefield; Kirks Ferry; Laniel; Wakefield.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Coleta; Pyriton (Clay Co. ) . CONNECTICUT - Cornwall (Litchfield Co. ) ; East Hartford (Hartford Co. ) ;
New Canaan (Fairfield Co.); New Haven (New Haven Co.); Stamford (Fairfield Co.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
FLORIDA - Brooksville (Hernando Co.); DeLeon Springs (Volusia Co.); Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Enterprise (Volusia
Co.); Gainesville (Alachua Co. ) ; Jacksonville (Duval Co. ) ; Levy Co. ; Myakka River State Park (Sarasota Co. ) ; O'Leno
State Park (Columbia Co. ) ; Sanford (Seminole Co. ) ; Tallahas see ( Leon Co. ) ; Taylor Co. ; Wakulla Co. GEORGIA -
Atlanta (Fulton Co.); Pine Mountain (Rabun Co. ) ; Prattsburg (Talbot Co.); Savannah (Chatham Co.); Tifton (Tift Co.).
ILLINOIS - Argo (Cook Co.); Cahokia (Saint Clair Co.); Chicago (Cook Co.); Evanston (Cook Co.); Galesburg (Knox
Co.); Joliet (Will Co. ); Murphysboro (Jackson Co. ) ; Olive Branch (Alexander Co. ) ; Palos Park (Cook Co. ) ; Ravinia
(Lake Co.); River side (Cook C o. ) ; U rbana (Champaign Co. ) ; Willow Springs (Cook Co.). INDIANA - Beverley Shores
(Porter Co.); Gary (Lake Co.); Hammond (Lake Co.); Kosciusko Co.; Marion Co.; Marshall Co.; Mineral Springs;
Osborn; Posey Co. IOWA - Dubuque (Dubuque Co.); Fort Madison (Lee Co.); Hills (Johnson Co.); Iowa City (Johnson
Co.); Sioux City (Woodbury Co. ) . KANSAS - Douglas Co. ; LabetteCo.; Manhattan (Riley Co. ) ; Topeka (Shawnee Co. ) .
KENTUCKY - Wyecliffe. LOUISIANA - Alexandria (Rapides Co.); Vowell's Mill (Natchitoches Co.). MAINE - Bangor
(Penobscot Co.); Bethel (Oxford Co.); Blackwood Camp, Acadia National Park; Casco (Cumberland Co.); Isle of
Springs (Lincoln Co.); Orono (Penobscot Co.); Waldoboro (Lincoln Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City);
Bladensburg (Prince Georges Co.); Bowie (Prince Georges Co.); Frederick (Frederick Co. ) ; Glen Echo (Montgomery
Co.); Great Falls (Montgomery Co.); Lanham (Prince Georges Co.); Oakland (Garrett Co.); Plummers Island; Spar-
rows Point (Baltimore Co.); Travilah. MASSACHUSETTS - Beach Bluff; Bedford (Middlesex Co. ) ; Brookline (Nor-
folk Co.); Canton (Norfolk Co. ) ; Clayton (Berkshire Co. ) ; Dedham (Norfolk Co. ); Dover (Norfolk C o. ) ; Framingham
(Middlesex Co. ); Goshon (Hampshire Co. ) ; Hadley (Hampshire Co. ) ; Hopkinton (Middlesex Co. ) ; Humarock (Plymouth
Co.); Milton (Norfolk Co.); Mount Tom (Hampshire Co.); Nantucket (Nantucket Co.); Princeton (Worcester Co.);
Sher born (Middles ex Co. ) ; Springfield (Hampden Co. ); Wayland (Middlesex Co. ) ; Woburn (Middlesex Co. ) . MICHIGAN -
Boyne Falls (Charlevoix Co. ); Cheboygan Co. ; Deerfield Township (Lapeer Co. ); Detroit (Wayne Co. ); Douglas Lake;
Galesburg (Kalamazoo Co.); Harbert Dunes (Barrien Co.); Midland Co.; Royal Oak (Oakland Co.); Sanford (Midland
Co.); South Haven (Van BurenCo.); Washtenaw Co. MINNESOTA - Houston Co.; Lake Minnetonka; Olmsted Co.;
Pine Co.; Two Harbors (Lake Co.); Winona Co. MISSISSIPPI - Beaumont (Perry Co.); Hancock Co.; Lucedale
(George Co.); Oxford (Lafayette Co.); Starkville (Okitibbeha Co.). MISSOURI - Jefferson City (Cole Co.); Saint Louis
(Independent City). NEBRASKA - West Point (Cuming Co.). NEW HAMPSHIRE - Christine Lake, Percy (Coos Co.);
Claremont (Sullivan Co.); Exeter (Rockingham Co.); Franconia (Grafton Co.); Hampton (Rockingham Co.); Hocksett
(Merrimack Co. ) ; Mount Surprise, Intervale (Car roll Co .) ; Rumney (Grafton Co. ) ; ThreeMile Island. NEW JERSEY -
Alpine (Bergen Co.); Anglesea; Atco (Camden Co.); Berkeley Heights (Union Co. ) ; Brown's Mills (Burlington Co. ) ;
Butler (Morris Co.); Chester (Morris Co.); Clementon (Camden Co.); Elizabeth (Union Co.); Hillsdale (Bergen Co.);
Madge
211
Iona (Gloucester Co,); Jamesburg (Middlesex Co.); Lahaway; Lake Hopatcong; Lakehurst (Ocean Co.); Lakewood
(Ocean Co.); Lucaston; Madison (Morris Co.); Malaga (Gloucester Co. ) ; Manasquan (Monmouth Co. ) ; Manchester;
Manumuskin; Montclair (Essex Co.); Morristown (Morris Co.); Mountain View (Passaic Co.); Newark (Essex Co.);
Oradell (BergenCo. ); Orange Mountains ; Ramapo Mountains; Ramsey (Bergen Co. ) ; Riverton (Burlington Co. ); Roselle
Park (Union Co.); Towaco (Morris Co.); Vineland (Cumberland Co.). NEW YORK - Allegany State Park (Cattaraugus
Co.); Amagansett (Suffolk Co. ); Barryville (Sullivan Co. ); Beaverkill (Sullivan Co. ) ; Bolton (Warren Co. ); Buffalo
(Erie Co.); Danby (Tompkins Co.); East Aurora (Erie Co.); Ellenville (Ulster Co.); Greenwood Lake (Orange Co.);
Hamburg (Erie Co.); Huguenot (Orange Co.); Indian Falls; Ithaca (Tompkins Co.); Lake George (Warren Co. ); Lan-
caster (Erie Co.); New Baltimore (Greene Co.); Newport (Herkimer Co.); New York City; Olcott (Niagara Co.); Oli-
verea (Ulster Co. ) ; Peekskill (Westchester Co. ) ; Pike (Wyoming Co. ); Pine Island (Orange Co. ); Quogue (Suffolk Co. );
Riverhead (Suffolk Co. ) ; Trout Lake; West Nyack (Rockland Co.); West Point (Orange Co. ); Whiteface Mountain (Essex
Co.); White Lake (Sullivan Co.); Yaphank (Suffolk Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Alleghany Co. ; Balsam Gap, Balsam
Mountains; Benson (Johnston Co. ) ; Black Mountain (Buncombe Co. ) ; Black Mountains ; Bryson City (Swain Co. ) ; Cher-
okee (Swain Co.); Crestmont (Haywood Co.); Edgecomb Co.; Gray Beard Mountain; Highlands (Macon Co.); Mount
Mitchell; Pisgah Mountain; Raleigh (Wake Co.); Retreat; Rnd. Knob; Washington (Beaufort Co. ) ; Willard (Pender
Co.). OHIO - Athens (Athens Co.); Cincinnati (Hamilton Co.); Cleveland (Cuyahoga Co.); Columbus (Franklin Co.);
Conneaut (Ashtabula Co. ) ; Erie Co. ; Lake Co. ; Marietta (Washington Co. ) ; Rock Creek (Ashtabula Co. ) . PENNSYL-
VANIA - Bear Meadows; Black Moshannon (Centre Co.); Burnt Cabins (Fulton Co.); Clearfield (Clearfield Co.); Del-
aware Water Gap (Monroe Co.); Hummelstown (Dauphin Co.); Lehigh Gap; Pocone Lake (Monroe Co.); Tannersville
(Monroe Co.); Twin Lakes (Pike Co. ) ; Wilmerding (Allegheny Co. ); Windgap (Northampton Co. ) ; Wisahickn. RHODE
ISLAND - Warwick (Kent Co.). SOUTH CAROLINA - Clemson (Oconee Co.); Florence (Florence Co.). TENNESSEE -
Elmwood (Smith Co.); Knoxville (Knox Co.); Memphis (Shelby Co.). TEXAS - Kirbyville (Jasper Co.); Victoria (Vic-
toria Co.). VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Falls Church (Fairfax Co.); Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.);
Great Falls (Fairfax Co. ) ; Mount Vernon (Fairfax Co.); Richmond (Henrico Co.); Rosslyn (A rlington Co. ); Warm
Springs (Bath Co.). WEST VIRGINIA - White Sulphur Springs (Greenbrier Co. ). WISCONSIN - Bayfield Co.
42. Lebia (Lebia) esurialis Casey
Lebia esurialis Casey 1920 : 257. Type locality - Texas (Brownsville).
Csiki 1932 : 1340 (Aphelogenia) .
Description
Length of elytra- 2. 12 - 2. 80 mm; mean (21 specimens) 2. 51 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (usually brownish,
genae lightest); frons with distinct microsculpture, a few very fine punc-
tures. Mouth parts pale except the darkened gula; mentumwith a tooth.
Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine microsculpture, sometimes indistinct, and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc dark with extensive pale markings (fig. 46); epi-
pleura pale. Disc with striae distinct, intervals more or less weakly
convex; apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 109, 110; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
five specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- This species on external characters may be confused
with ornata and possibly with calliope. The distinctive features of calliope
and the points separating it from esurialis are discussedunder that species .
The features of the elytral pattern separating esurialis from Texas speci-
mens of ornata (only two seen) lie in the basal dark markings . In esurialis
the dark markings either do not reach the shoulder or if they do are
solid all the way across. In ornata the basal dark marking is divided or
almost so with the result that there are separate humeral and circum-
scutellar markings.
212
Revision of Lebia
Variation - The humeral area of the elytra is usually without dark
markings but in some specimens the coloration spreads across from the
dark circumscutellar spot.
Distribution^ North of Mexicothis species is known only from eas-
tern Texas; 34 specimens were studied from the following localities.
Brownsville (Cameron Co.); Columbus (Colorado Co.); Dallas (Dallas Co.); Kingsville (Kleberg Co.); Laredo (Webb
Co.); Lavaca Co.; Uvalde (Uvalde Co.); Victoria (Victoria Co.).
43. Lebia (Lebia) calliope Bates
Lebia calliope Bates 1883:231. Type locality - Mexico, Mirador, Cerro de
Plumas; Guatemala, San Geronimo. Schaeffer 1910 : 398. Leng
1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1333 {Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 :
53.
Lebia serpentina Casey 1920 : 256. Type locality - Texas (Brownsville).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1341 { Aphelogenia) .
Description
Length of elytra - 2. 72 - 3. 32 mm; mean (19 specimens) 3. 04 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, and genae dark (usually brownish), clypeus
usually pale; frons with distinct microsculpture, without distinct macro-
sculpture. Mouth parts pale; mentum with a tooth. Antennae entirely
pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of the prono turn palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with fine microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc dark with pale markings (fig. 47); epipleura pale.
Disc with striae distinct, intervals more or less weakly convex; apical
pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium pale.
Male genitalia- Armature . of endophallus as in fig. Ill; apex of
median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in five
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Lebia calliope resembles two other species occurring in
Texas, ornata and esurialis. The most distinctive external feature of
calliope is its elytral pattern, especially the shape of the basal pale spot.
As the base of elytra is always dark in calliope most specimens of esurialis
can be separated by the pale humeral area. Also, the gula is usually
pale in calliope 3 dark in ornata and esurialis. Males of all three species
can be readily identified by the endophallic armature.
Variation - There appears to be no important variation in calliope.
Synonymy.. Lebia serpentina C a. sey is here regarded as a synonym of
calliope. Casey's description fits the present species very well and could
not apply to either esurialis or ornata . The features used by Casey to
separate his serpentina from calliope (prothorax relatively narrower and
the pattern slightly different) are of minor importance.
Distribution- This species is found north of Mexico only in south-
eastern Texas; 21 specimens were studied, all from Brownsville (Cam-
Madge
213
eron Co. ).
44. Lebia (Lebia) bumeliae Schaeffer
Lebia bumeliaeSchdieifer 1910 : 399. Type locality - Brownsville, Texas.
Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1328 {Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra- 1. 76 - 2. 20 mm; mean (6 specimens) 1.98 mm.
Head- Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons with dis-
tinct microsculpture, macrosculpture lacking. Mouth parts pale'; men-
tum with a tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc dark with pale markings (fig. 48); epipleura pale.
Disc vaulted, with striae distinct, intervals flat or weakly convex; apical
pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter pale basally, darker apically and at the sides;
pygidium dark.
Male genitalia - Armature of endophallus as in fig. 112; apex of
median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in two
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition - The color pattern, vaulted elytra, and small size
serve to separate this species from any other s within its range. It might
possibly be confused with esurialis on size but the head is pale in bumelieae i
dark in esurialis.
Variation - This species apparently varies in its elytral pattern.
Although in all six specimens seen the elytral pattern was as figured,
in the original description Schaeffer mentions that some of the specimens
lack the pale apical spot and that the basal spot is smaller.
Distribution - Lebia bumeliae is known only from southeastern Texas.
Six specimens were studied from the following localities: Brownsville
(Cameron Co.); Corpus Christ! (Nueces Co.).
45. Lebia (Lebia) lecta Horn
Lefe/a /ec^aHorn 1885 : 131. Type locality - Florida. Leng 1920 : 66 {Lebia).
Csiki 1932 : 1329 {Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra- 2. 00 mm (1 specimen).
Head -Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae pale; frons with distinct
microsculpture, macrosculpture lacking. Mouth parts pale; mentum
with a tooth. Antennae entirely pale. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
214
Revision of Lebia
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra - Disc metallic green; epipleura pale. Disc vaulted, with
striae distinct, intervals weakly convex; apical pinch well developed;
basal ridge incomplete.
Legs - Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter (except very base) and pygidium dark.
Male genitalia - Unknown.
Discussion
Recognition- Lebia lecta is the only extremely small with met-
allic green elytra and a pale head and thorax known to occur in Florida.
Distribution - This species is known only from Florida. The one
specimen seen was from Miami (Dade Co.). Very possibly lecta occurs
in the Caribbean although Blackwelder (1944) does not list it.
46- Lebia (Lebia) collaris Dejean
Lebia collaris Dejean 1826 : 456. Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale ".
LeConte 1848 : 195. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold
1868 : 137. Chaudoir 1870 : 199. Horn 1872 : 136. Leng 1920 :
66 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1328 (Lebia). Blackwelder 1944 : 53.
Description
Length of elytra- 3. 04 - 4. 00 mm; mean (24 specimens) 3.42 mm.
Head - Frons, vertex, clypeus, and genae dark (genae palest);
frons with distinct microsculpture, fine punctures, and a few wrinkles
next to eyes. Mouth parts dark, ligulaand maxillae pale in some speci-
mens; mentum with a tooth. Antennae with segments one to three pale,
four to eleven infuscated. Neck not strongly constricted.
Prothorax - Entirely pale, lateral margins of pronotum palest.
Pronotum transverse in shape, lateral margins widened basally; disc
with distinct microsculpture and very fine wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum pale.
Elytra- Disc entirely dark except for pale lateral margin; epi-
pleura pale. Elytral disc with striae distinct, intervals weakly convex;
apical pinch well developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Wings- Triangular remnant of oblongum cell present.
Legs- Entirely pale. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter pale, darkened towards apex. Pygidium infus-
cated.
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 113, 114 (note
the large basal bulge and abruptly cut off apex of endophallus); apex of
median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in four
specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition- Only the immaculate forms of analis and omata are
similar to collaris in color (head and elytral disc dark, the rest pale).
Lebia analis can be distinguished by its striated frons, this area being
smooth in collaris. From ornata , collaris can be distinguished by the tri-
angular remnant of the oblongum cell in its wing and by the endophallic
Madge
215
armature of the male genitalia. Immaculate specimens of ornata are
usually smaller than collaris and the abdomen is pale throughout, not
darkened apically.
Variation - There appears to be no important variation in collaris.
Synonymy- Lebia nigripennis has often been regarded as a small form
of collaris. However, judging from its size and reddish head, it is almost
certainly the immaculate form of ornata.
Distribution- Lebia collaris occuxs in the southeastern United States
northward to Indiana (fig. 136); 26 specimens were studied from the
following localities.
FLORIDA - Crescent City (Putnam Co.); Dade Co.; Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Marion Co. ; Orange Co.; Tampa (Hills-
borough Co.). GEORGIA - Savannah (Chatham Co. ). INDIANA - Crawford Co. NORTH CAROLINA - Southern Pines
(Moore Co. ) .
47- Lebia (Lebia) pumila Dejean
Lebia pumila Dejean 1831 : 388. Type locality - "Amerique septentrionale ",
LeConte 1848 : 195. LeConte 1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold
1866 : 140. Chaudoir 1870 : 190. Horn 1872 : 135. Blatchley
1910 : 146. Casey 1920 : 249. Leng 1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki
1932 ; 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia maculicornis LeConte 1848 : 195. Type locality - Georgia. LeConte
1863 : 5. Gemminger and Harold 1868 : 139.
Lebia pumila maculicornis I Chaudoir 1870 : 190. Horn 1872 : 135.
Lebia rhodopus SchwaiTz 1878. Type locality - "Tampa", Florida. NEW
SYNONYMY. Blatchley 1910 : 145. Casey 1920 : 248. Leng
1920 : 66 (Lebia). Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia viridis (in part, incorrect synonymy with rhodopus); Horn 1882 : 130.
Lebia ter tiaria Casey 1920 : 248. Type locality - District of Columbia.
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1331 (Lebia).
Lebia ludovicianaC as ey 1920 : 248. Type locality - Louisiana (Alexandria).
NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia quadrata Casey 1920 : 249. Type locality - North Carolina (Southern
Pines). Csiki 1932 : 1330 (Lebia).
Lebia mini Casey 1920 : 249. Type locality - Northern Illinois. NEW
SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 (Lebia).
Lebia frugalis Casey 1920 : 250. Type locality - Lake Superior (Bayfield,
Wisconsin). NEW SYNONYMY. Csiki 1932 : 1329 ( Lebia).
Description
Length of elytra- Metallic form: 2. 16 - 2. 80 mm; mean (19 speci-
mens) 2.62 mm; non-metallic form: 1.56-2.64 mm; mean (20 speci-
mens) 1. 96 mm.
Head - Frons, clypeus, vertex, and genae dark; frons with dis-
tinct microsculpture but without punctures and wrinkles. Mouth parts
dark except pale ligula; mentum with a tooth. Antennae with segments
one and two variable in color but palest on under surface, segment three
usually pale, segments four to eleven dark. Neck not strongly cons-
tricted.
Prothorax - Entirely dark, pronotum slightly metallic in some
specimens. Pronotum shaped in fig. 9, lateral margins narrow and
weakly widened basally; disc with distinct microsculpture, lacking any
216
Revision of Lebia
fine punctures or wrinkles.
Pterothorax - Sterna, pleura, and scutellum dark (usually piceous).
Elytra-^ Disc dark, sometimes metallic; epipleura dark. Disc
with striae indistinct, intervals very weakly convex; apical pinch well
developed; basal ridge incomplete.
Legs- Varying in color from dark to pale, tarsi always dark or
infuscated. Fourth segment of hind tarsus bilobed.
Abdomen - Venter and pygidium dark (usually piceous). Lateral
lobes of fifth abdominal sternum very wide (fig. 12).
Male genitalia- Armature of endophallus as in figs. 115, 116; apex
of median lobe tapered to a broad point. The endophallic armature in
nine specimens was examined.
Discussion
Recognition ~ The pale-legged forms of Lebm pz/zn/Za present no dif-
ficulty in identification, there being no other species with the upper sur-
face entirely dark or metallic and the legs pale. However, specimens
with dark legs resemble the non-metallic form of viridis. The most dis-
tinctive feature separating these is the width of the lateral lobes of the
fifth abdominal sternum, each of these being wider than the central trough
in pumila , equal to or narrower than it is in viridis. In addition the third
antennal segment is usually pale in pumila, dark in viridis.
Variation - Specimens of pumila vary in color and size. Northern
specimens are entirely dark and are usually small. South of a line run-
ning approximately through Pennsylvania the legs are usually pale. A
few of these pale-legged specimens, especially those in the extreme
south, are much larger and have a tendency to become metallic. The
endophallic armature also shows some variation. The number of spines
is reduced in some specimens with the result that the spines on the right
side of the endophallus may be absent.
Synonymy- The small dark form with dark legs is the form evi-
dently described by Dejean. Casey's names illini and frugalis also apply
to this form. The strength of the elytral striae used by Casey to dis-
tinguish these two from pumila is a variable and entirely unreliable char-
acter in this species. The names Lebia quadrata Ca,sey Rnd Lebia ludoviciana
Casey apply to the small form with dark elytra and more or less pale
legs. It is rather doubtful if the elytra of quadrata are actually not longer
than wide as stated by Casey. Quite possibly the elytra are somewhat
split along the suture. The fifth species described by Casey, tertiaria ,
is that form of pumila which is large, non-metallic, and with pale legs.
The other two names considered synonyms here apply to the large pale-
legged form with the elytral disc either slightly metallic ( maculicornis) or
distinctly metallic ( rhodopus ).
The name Lebm /“/orzco/a Harris is apparently a nomen nudum . There
is no type in the Harris collection at the Museum of Comparative Zoology
and no description could be found by G. E. Ball when he checked through
The New England Farmer where the name was supposedly published. The first
reference to the species is apparently that of LeConte (1948) where it is
listed as a synonym of pumila .
Even though there is considerable variation in both color and size
Madge
217
there seems to be only one species present. Both the external and geni-
talic structures are the same throughout. In color intermediate types
occur between the metallic and non-metallic forms and between the pale
and dark-legged forms. Large specimens, occurring mainly in the
south, usually have pale legs but in a few of the more northerly ones the
legs are dark.
Distribution- Le bi a pumi la ra.nges across the northern United States
and adjacent Canada and south to the Gulf Coast in the east (fig. 132).
Over 750 specimens were studied from the following localities.
CANADA
ALBERTA - Medicine Hat. BRITISH COLUMBIA - Hope. MANITOBA - Aweme; Carberry; Roblin; Saint Lazare;
Stony Mountain; Treesbank. NEW BRUNSWICK - Penobquis. ONTARIO - Bell's Corners; Brittania; Consecon; Emo;
Gravenhurst; Gull Lake; Marmora; Moosonee; Point Pelee; Toronto; White Lake. QUEBEC - Duchesnay; Duparquet;
Hull; Kazubazua; Knowlton; Laurel; Schwarz; Val Morin; Wolf Lake. SASKATCHEWAN - Canora; Kenosee Lake;
Oxbow; Saskatoon; Torch River.
UNITED STATES
ALABAMA - Birmingham (Jefferson Co.); Coleta; Oak Grove (Mobile Co.); Pyriton (Clay Co.). ARKANSAS - Hope
(Hempstead Co.). CONNECTICUT - Canaan (Litchfield Co.); Cornwall (Litchfield Co.); Kent (Litchfield Co.); Litch-
field (Litchfield Co.); Stafford (Tolland Co.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. FLORIDA - Dunedin (Pinellas Co.); Enter-
prise (Volusia Co.); Fort Myers (Lee Co.); Oneco (Manatee Co.); Orlando (Orange Co.). GEORGIA - Atlanta (Fulton
Co.); Savannah (Chatham Co.). ILLINOIS - Chicago (Cook Co.); Evanston (Cook Co.); Galesburg (Knox Co.); Palos
Park (CookCo.); Steger (CookCo.). INDIANA - FranklinCo.; Hammond (Lake Co.); Jackson Co. ; Jennings Co. ;
Lake Station; Marion Co. ; Mineral Springs; Pine; Posey Co. ; Putnam Co. ; Springville (Lawrence Co.); Starke Co. ;
Vermilion Co.; Winona Lake (Kosciusko Co.). IOWA - Ames (Story Co.); Fort Madison (Lee Co.); Iowa City (Johnson
Co.); Lake Okoboji (Dickinson Co.); Ledyard (Kossuth Co.); Sioux City (Woodbury Co.). KANSAS - Blackjack Creek
(Pottawatomie Co.); Douglas Co.; Kiowa Co.; Onaga (Pottawatomie Co.); Riley Co.; Topeka (Shawnee Co.); Trego
Co. KENTUCKY - Livingston (Rockcastle Co.). LOUISIANA - Bayou Sara; Bossier Co.; Covington (Saint Tammany
Co.); Desoto; Franklin (Saint Mary Co. ) ; Opelcusas (Saint Landry Co. ) . MAINE - Bar Harbor (Hamcock Co. ); Baxter
State Park (Piscataquis Co.); Casco (Cumberland Co.); Greenville (Piscataquis Co.); Paris (Oxford Co.); Salsbury
Cove (Hancock Co. ) ; Stratton (Franklin Co.). MARYLAND - Baltimore (Independent City) ; Bladenburg (Prince Georges
Co.); Glen Echo (Montgomery Co. ); Nanjemoy (Charles Co. ) . MASSACHUSETTS - Brookline (Norfolk Co. ) ; Cambridge
(Middlesex Co.); Framingham (Middlesex Co.); Granby (Hampshire Co.); Hadley (Hampshire Co.); Milton (Norfolk
Co.); Natick (Middlesex Co. ) ; North Attleboro (Bristol Co. ) ; Northboro (Worcester Co. ); Northfield (Franklin Co. ) ;
Sanborn; Sherborn (Middlesex Co. ) ; Southboro (Worcester Co.); Springfield (Hampden Co. ) ; Tyngsboro (Middlesex
Co.); Wellesley (Norfolk Co.); Westfield (Hampden Co.). MICHIGAN -Ann Arbor (Washtenaw Co.); Cedar River
(Menominee Co.); Galesburg (Kalamazoo Co.); Grand Ledge (Eaton Co.); Lansing (Ingham Co.); Royal Oak (Oakland
Co.); Sanford (Midland Co. ) . MINNESOTA - Chisago Co. ; Crookston (Polk Co. ) ; Euclid (Polk Co. ) ; Frontenac (Good-
hue Co.); Itasca State Park (Clearwater Co.); Kawishiwi; Middle River (Marshall Co.); Mille Lacs (Crow Wing Co.);
Mora (Kanabec Co.); Olmsted Co.; Saint Paul (Ramsey Co.); Tamarack (Aitkin Co.); Traverse Co.; Two Harbors
(Lake Co.); Washington Co. MISSISSIPPI - Lucedale (George Co.). MISSOURI - Saint Louis (Independent City). NEB-
RASKA - Glen (Sioux. Co.); West Point (Cuming Co.). NEW HAMPSHIRE - Barnstead (Belknap Co.); Dover (Stafford
Co.); Durham (Stafford Co. ) ; Franconia (Grafton Co. ) ; Hampton (Rockingham Co. ); Mount Surprise, Intervale (Carroll
Co.); Mount Washington (Coos Co.); Randolph (Coos Co.); Rumney (Grafton Co.); Squam Lake; Twin Mountain (Coos
Co.). NEW JERSEY - Atlantic City (Atlantic Co.); Atsion; Boonton (Morris Co.); Chester (Morris Co.); Clifton
(Passaic Co. ); Denville (Morris Co. ); Fort Lee (Bergen Co. ); Hillsdale (Bergen Co. ); Manasquan (Monmouth Co. );
Midvale; Montclair (Essex Co.); Oak Ridge (Passaic Co.); Palisades; Paterson (Passaic Co.); Phillipsburg (Warren
Co.); Stockholm (Sussex Co.); Upper Montclair (Essex Co.); NEW YORK - Bellport (Suffolk Co.); Callicoon (Sullivan
Co.); Croton-on-Hudson (Westchester Co.); Delmar (Albany Co.); Gowanda (Cattaraugus Co.); Harmon-on-Hudson
(Westchester Co.); Horicon; Huguenot (Orange Co.); Lake George (Warren Co.); Mohegan Lake (Westchester Co.);
Mount Kisco (Westchester Co.); Mount Whiteface; New Rochelle (Westchester Co.); New York City; Roslyn (Nassau
Co.); Saranac Lake (Franklin Co.); Ulster Co. ; West Point (Orange Co.); White Lake (Sullivan Co. ); Wilmington
(Essex Co.); Wyandanch (Suffolk Co.); Yaphank (Suffolk Co.). NORTH CAROLINA - Black Mountain (Buncombe Co.);
Black Mountains; Blue Ridge (Buncombe Co. ); Charlotte (Mecklenburg Co. ) ; Cherokee (Swain Co. ) ; Gray Beard Moun-
tain; Highlands (Macon Co.); Lake Toxaway (Transylvania Co.); Swannanoa Val. OHIO - Bedford (Cuyahoga Co.);
Cincinnati (Hamilton Co. ); Cleveland (Cuyahoga Co. ) ; Kirtland; Pierpoint (Ashtabula Co. ) ; OKLAHOMA - Atoka (Atoka
Co.); McAlester (Boone Co.); Tulsa (Tulsa Co.). PENNSYLVANIA - Arendtsville (Adams Co.); Canadensis (Monroe
Co.); Clark's Valley; Delaware Water Gap (Monroe Co.); Easton (Northampton Co. ); Effort (Monroe Co.); Green-
town (Pike Co.); Lehigh Gap; McKeesport (Allegheny Co.); Montrose (Susquehanna Co.); New Cumberland (Cumber-
land Co.); Olive Branching; Philadelphia (Philadelphia Co.); Pittsburgh (Allegheny Co.); Poeono Lake (Monroe Co.);
Reading (Berks Co.); State College (Centre Co.); Wind Gap (Northampton Co. ) . RHODE ISLAND - Warwick (Kent Co.).
SOUTH CAROLINA - Charleston (Charleston Co.). SOUTH DAKOTA - Brookings (Brookings Co. ) ; Sheridan Lake, Black
Hills (Pennington Co.); Volga (Brookings Co.). TENNESSEE - Burrville (Morgan Co.); Chapman's, Great Smoky
Mountains National Park; Johnson City (Washington Co. ) ; Memphis (Shelby Co. ) ; Mount LeConte (Sevier Co. ) . TEXAS -
Brownsville (Cameron Co. ). VERMONT - Bennington Co.; Brattleboro (Windham Co.); Wookstock (Windsor Co.).
VIRGINIA - Alexandria (Independent City); Buffalo Creek; Dead Run (Fairfax Co.); Falls Church (Arlington Co.);
Fredericksburg (Spotsylvania Co.); Great Falls (Fairfax Co.); Pennington Gap (Lee Co.); Shenandoah Park; Stone
Creek (Lee Co.); Vienna (Fairfax Co. ) ; Warm Springs (Bath Co.). WASHINGTON - Olympia (Thurston Co.). WEST
VIRGINIA - Fairmont (Marion Co.); Mount Pendleton; White Sulphur Springs (Greenbrier Co.). WISCONSIN - Bayfield
(Bayfield Co.).
218
Revision of Lebia
Doubtful Species
Motschoulsky (1864) described five new species of North Amer-
ican Lebia in addition to giving descriptions of several previously named
species. Most of the descriptions were based entirely on color with no
morphological characters and no specific localities . One of the previously
named species mentioned by Motschoulsky, L. scapularis Dejean, has a
description which obviously does not apply to Dejean's species. Horn
guessed at the identities of this and four of the new species as follows.
L. scapularis Motschoulsky (not Dejean) = L. ornata Say
L. /"/ayo/meafa Motschoulsky = L. scapz//ans Dejean (= L. solea Hentz)
L. suhfigurata Motschoulsky = L. analisDejean
L. flaviventris Motschoulsky = L. ornata Say
L. brunnicollis Motschoulsky = L. lobulata L^eC onte
Horn did not guess at the identity of the fifth new species, sublimbata .
The suggested identity of flavolineata is here accepted as correct; the
others remain doubtful. The above guesses, if proven correct, would
have no effect on the nomenclature of the species involved.
Chaudoir (1870), on the basis of two specimens in the Reiche
collection, listed Lebia (Loxopeza) chloroptera Chaudoir as questionably com-
ing from Florida. As the few specimens of Loxopeza I have seen from
Florida could be assigned to either grandis, atriventris , or trieolor this re-
cord of chloroptera is probably invalid. It may have been based on either
misidentified or mislabelled specimens.
Lebia punctifera LeConte 1884 cannot be reconciled with any species
recognized in this study. Judging from its brown coloration and punc-
tate upper surface it could be a Cymindis or Pinacodera.
I have seen one specimen of Lebia quadric olor Chevrolat from Carbon
Co., Wyoming. This record of this Central American species is almost
certainly incorrect.
PHYLOGENY OF THE GENUS LEBIA
Relationships of the Genus
From a comparison of the North American and a few exotic Lebia
with the other North American lebiines the greatest similarity is found
between some members of the subgenus Lamprias and the genus Cymindis.
Both have the upper surface of the body covered with strong punctures
and short erect hairs, a strongly arched frons, a more or less lobed
pronotum which is not strongly transverse, and stout truncate palpi.
Assuming that these characters in common are indicative of close re-
lationship the features of the ancestral Lebia can be postulated. This
will provide a basis for an intrageneric classification of Lebia.
In addition to the generic characters and the four characters men-
tioned above, the primitive Lebia would have had epilobes and a distinct
tooth on the mentum, an upper protibial spur, a complete oblongum cell
in the wing venation, the basal ridge of the elytra complete, and the
fourth segment of the hind tarsus emarginate. These characters are
common to Cymindis and the primitive Lamprias as well as being found in
most other carabids. As Lamprias has the elytral disc metallic this was
Madge
219
probably the condition present in the prinaitive Lebia and not non-metallic
as in Cymindis, Since a dark abdomen is often associated with metallic
elytra in Lebia this feature is considered to be primitive also. The head,
thorax, and legs were probably pale. The apex of the median lobe was
probably tapered to a broad point and not specialized in any way.
Relationships of the Subgenera
I. Loxopeza
Of the four subgenera found north of Mexico Loxopeza seems to
have diverged very early from the primitive stock. It has retained such
primitive morphological features as a complete oblongum cell in the
wing venation, epilobes and a tooth on the mentum, an upper protibial
spur, and the primitive coloration. It has developed distinctive geni-
talia (strong endophallic armature and a short apex to the median lobe),
obliquely expanded protarsi in the males, and a rather small tooth on
the mentum. The strong punctation and short hairs of the ancestral
stock have been lost. The subgenus is found only in the New World and
probably arose here. The tropical American subgenus Lia (as repres-
ented by the Mexican ocelligera) also has expanded protarsi in the male,
a small tooth on the mentum, and the apex of the median lobe of the
male very short (although different from Loxopeza). It may well be a
branch of the line leading to Loxopeza,
II. Polycheloma
The position of this subgenus in relation to the other subgenera
is uncertain. It retains an upper protibial spur and indistinct epilobes
on the mentum but has lost the strong punctation and pubescence of the
ancestral type as well as the primitive coloration. However, the apex
of the median lobe is of the primitive type. Tentatively the subgenus is
placed as a specialized branch arising before the separation of Lamprias
and Lebia s.s.
III. Lamprias
The subgenus Lamprias is considered to be most like the ancestral
stock. The most primitive species retain all the features of the hypo-
thetical ancestral group except that the oblongum cell is not quite com-
plete. In the more advanced species (two have been seen, chlorocephala
Hoffman and cyanocephala Linnaeus) the oblongum cell and the punctation
are markedly reduced. As most specie-s of Lamprias are found in the
Palaearctic Region the subgenus probably originated there.
IV. Lebia s.s.
The fourth and by far the largest subgenus is Lebia s.s. with more
than three fourths of our species. The subgenus is considered to be a
branch of the ancestral stock in which the upper protibial spur, the
epilobes on the mentum, and the complete oblongum cell were lost. A
few species retain the strong punctation and short erect hairs on the
frons and are probably the most primitive. Although considered hereto
be a natural group of species it should be pointed out that the three char-
acters which hold the subgenus together all represent a reduction and
220
Revision of Lebia
all three have been attained independently either in other subgenera of
Lebia or in other Lebiine genera. It is thus possible that Lebia s.s. is
polyphyletic.
Relationships of the Species within the Subgenera
/. Loxopeza
The eight species of the subgenus Loxopeza occurring north of
Mexico are difficult to relate with any degree of certainty. The difficulty
can be ascribed to the few characters available, the classification pro-
posed here being almost entirely based on the endophallic armature of
the male genitalia. In outlining the relationships the presentation is di-
vided into two parts. In the first part the species are placed together
into small groups. These groups are thought to be natural and there is
good evidence for them. In the second part the small groups are related.
However, the evidence for relating these groups is usually poorer. The
species groups are referred to by the name of the first species listed in
the group and their relationships are portrayed graphically in fig. 143.
Lebia atriventris and atriceps. These two species are placed together
because they both lack the seventh group of spines and the spines of the
sixth group are short and broad. Also in these two species the palpi and
the distal antennal segments are usually dark.
Lebia tricolor, subdola, and deceptrix . These three species appear to
be related because the first group of spines is small and the seventh
group curves around the base of the first and is not found in a fold in the
endophallus. Of these three tricolor and subdola seem to be the closest
together since in these two the sixth group is made up of very short broad
spines arranged in a loose cluster. In deceptrix the spines of the sixth
group are longer and more densely clustered. The presence of an eighth
group in tricolor is considered to be a specialization and seems to indicate
that the specific distinctness of tricolor and subdola is not just a relatively
recent happening.
Lebia grand! s, subgi-andis, and pimalis. In this group of species the first
group of spines on the endophallus is large and well developed, and the
seventh group is situated mainly at the side of the first and in a fold of
the endophallus. Of the three grandis and subgrandis are the most closely
allied, differing mainly in the size of the third group of spines of the
endophallic armature. Lebia pimalis with, its strongly convex elytral in-
tervals seems to be related to a Mexican species with similar elytra but
a dark colored head.
Of the three groups proposed here it would seem that the tricolor
and the grandis groups are the most closely allied. In these the seventh
group of spines is present (absent in the atriuenlris group). As the sub-
genus is very isolated as far as I know it is difficult to determine which
group is the most primitive. On the assumption that the most primitive
type of endophallic armature in Loxopeza is the simplest in structure the
atriuentris group which lacks the seventh group of spines would occupy this
position. The idea that the largest number of species occurs in the more
advanced (and presumably more successful) groups agrees with this posi-
tion.
Madge
221
II. Polycheloma
With only one species there is no intra subgeneric classification.
III. Lamprias
The only New World species of Lamprias 3 divisa » is a primitive
member of the subgenus, having well developed punctures and pubes-
cence and a partially complete oblongum cell in the wing venation.
IV. Lebia s. s.
Thirty-seven of our 47 species of Lebia belong to the nominate
subgenus. The relationships of the species belonging to this section of
the genus are uncertain at the present time. Although the majority of
the species can be grouped into species groups the relationships between
these groups are in most cases vague. The reason for this is that the
"missing links", if extant, do not occur in the area under study here.
The relationships are portrayed in the same manner as in the subgenus
Loxopeza 3 first by grouping the species and then relating the species
groups .
Lebia pulchella, viridipennis, and bitaeniata. The first two species, although
appearing quite different, are closely related and have very similar en-
dophallic armatures. Both species have the basal ridge of the elytra
incomplete. Judging from theoverlapin distribution these two have been
distinct for a considerable period of time. Lebia bitaeniata3 a predominantly
tropical species, probably belongs in this group. The endophallic ar-
mature, although appearing very different, shows the same pattern of
spines. Also, the basal ridge of the elytra is incomplete, the elytra are
metallic with pale fasciae as in most specimens of pulchella3 and the fe-
mora are dark tipped like viridipennis and like some specimens of pulchella .
Lebia rufopleura. This species, although evidently indistinguishable
from pleuritica on external characters, is not closely related to it, the
endophallic armature being much stronger and better developed in
rufopleura. The relationships seem to be with two Mexican species I have
seen {Lebia chalybe Bates and an unknown species).
Lebia pleuritica, tuckeri, arizonica, and cyanipennis. This group of four
species is held together by similarities in the structure of the endophallus,
the armature being either weak or lacking. In external structure, all
have metallic elytra, a dark abdomen, a complete basal ridge to the ely-
tra, and the frons weakly sculptured. Within the group, arizonica and
cyanipennis are probably closely allied as evidenced by the flat or weakly
convex elytral intervals, the infuscated metepisternum and the usually
unarmed endophallus. L. pleuritica is probably most closely related to
tuckeri judging from their very similar endophallic armatures.
Lebia viridis, perita, and marginicollis . The group comprising these
species is characterized by similarities in endophallic armature; the
elytra are usually metallic; the head, thorax, and abdomen dark or me-
tallic; and the frons is usually striated at least at the sides. Of the
three, perita and marginicollis are the most closely related, both with the
basal ridge of the elytra incomplete (complete in uind/s), the head and
pronotum dark or only feebly metallic (concolorous with the elytra in
viridis)3 the lobe of the endophallus in a central position (figs. 75,
222
Revision of Lebia
77, cf. viridis } fig. 73).
Lebia scapula. There appears to be no closely related species, at
least north of Mexico.
Lebia analis. North of Mexico there appears to be no species which
could be placed in the same group as analis. The closest species is scalpta .
Lebia scalpta. This is another species which stands alone. Exter-
nally it appears very closely related to analis but the armature of the
endophallus and the narrowly pointed apex of the median lobe indicate
that it is more advanced and approaches the following species.
Lebia solea and miranda . These two species are part of a group in
which the neck is strongly constricted, the frons is striated at least on
the lateral thirds, the mentum is without a tooth, and the pronotal mar-
gins are widened basally. Most of the species making up Chaudoir's
genus Dianchomena belong here. Within this group solea and miranda seem
to be closely related judging from their similar endophallic armature
and basically vittate elytra.
Lebia vittata, histrionica, pectita, and nigricapitata. The mentum of these
species lacks a tooth, the femora are at least dark tipped, the apex of
the median lobe is narrow, and the armature of the endophallus is very
similar. L. vittata a.nd histrionica are placed together because of their com-
plete basal ridge to the elytra and the somewhat narrower apex to the
median lobe when seenin lateral view. In pectita and nigricapitata the basal
ridge is incomplete and the apex of the median lobe is slightly broader in
lateral view.
Lebia bivittata, bilineata, and abdominalis. This is another group without
a tooth on the mentum and with a narrow apex to the median lobe. The
pronotum has narrow margins which do not widen basally, the endophallus
is unarmed, and the sterna and pleura are mostly dark. Of these three
bivittata and bilineata are the closest. They do not have the neck strongly
constricted as in abdominalis and the apical pinch of the elytra is poorly
developed.
Lebia guttula, abdita, and insulata. These three species seem to form a
natural group even though the elytral patterns are rather different. The
tooth on the mentum is absent and the endophallic armature in all three
is basically the same. The smaller size and elytral pattern of abdita and
guttula indicate that these are closer to each other than either is to insulata.
Lebia fuscata, subrugosa, and perpallida . The first two of these have a
strong groove on the frons next to the eye and a similar elytral pattern.
Lebia perpallida is grouped with them as it seems related, on the basis of
the endophallic armature, to an unidentified Mexican species which in
turn seems related to fuscata and subrugosa on elytral color pattern.
Lebia lobulata. I have seen no other species which I would group
with lobulata.
Lebia ornata, esurialis, and calliope . No doubt Lebia ornata and esurialis
belong together. Their elytral patterns are very similar (in some speci-
mens almost indistinguishable) and the endophallic armatures are basi-
cally the same although strongly different in details. Whether calliope
belongs here is uncertain but because it is similar in size, elytral color
pattern, and basic structure of the endophallus it is included.
Lebia bumeliae and lecta. These two species are placed together be-
Madge
223
cause of their small size, vaulted elytra, and frons without macrosculp-
ture. The endophallic armature of only bumeliae has been seen so it is
uncertain how similar this structure is in the two species.
Lebia collaris. Although this species on external structure is very
similar to the southern dark form of ornata it is exceedingly different in
the structure of the endophallic armature. I can place no other species
with it.
Lebia pumila. I have seenno species which I would regard as being
at all close to pumila.
Of the groups proposed here the pulchella group is pos sibly an early
offshoot of the base of the subgenus. The only evidence for this is the
strong punctation and short erect setae on the frons of pulchella. In other
characters. such as the incomplete basal ridge of the elytra, the usually
maculate elytral disc, and the pale abdomen these species are advanced.
It is possible that this group is not closely related to the other New World
species as the endophallic armature of pulchella and viridipennis is similar
to that found in the European Lebia crux-minor Linnaeus. The frons of this
species is also strongly punctate with short setae, and the basal ridge
of the elytra is incomplete.
The rufopleura 3 pleuritica, and viridis groups seem to be closely re-
lated and to occupy a position near the base of the subgenus because of
their metallic elytra and dark abdomen. The rufopleura and pleuritica groups
are the most closely allied of these three, lacking the strong lobe found
on the endophallus in the viridis group, and usually having the head and
thorax pale (dark or metallic in the viridis group).
The position of the scapula group is uncertain at the present time.
The endophallic armature has a well developed lobe on it and the spines
are small and arranged in simple rows which is suggestive of the viridis
group. In addition the abdomen is dark. However, the elytra are non-
metallic and maculate although the type of maculation is peculiar, there
being no pale apical markings. Perhaps it could be placed at the base
of the maculate species but after the metallic species.
The remaining groups of mainly maculate species are difficult
to relate. However, of these the analis, scalpta, soleat vittata» and bivittata
groups can be placed together. In these species the dark coloration of
the head and elytral disc is usually blackand not brownish although there
are exceptions . Other than this there is really no character which con-
nects them all, although they can be arranged in a series. Starting with
analis with a tooth on the mentum and a wide apex to the median lobe the
series advances to scalpta in which the tooth on the mentum is present
but the apex of the median lobe is narrow. Both of these species have
the frons strongly striated. In the remaining three groups the tooth on
the mentum is absent, the apex of the median lobe is narrow, and the
elytra are usually vittate. The solea group in which at least some of the
species have the frons completely striated is probably the most prim-
itive even though the strongly constricted neck is a specialized feature.
Of the bivittata and vittata groups, both having the frons smooth, the for-
mer is probably the more advanced. Its species have the pronotal mar-
gins narrow and the basal ridge to the elytra incomplete.
The guttula group may be related to the preceding groups as the
224
Revision of Lebia
species in it lack the tooth on the mentum and have the apex of the me-
dian lobe narrow. However, the elytral patterns and the brownish dark
coloration of the elytral disc are suggestive of the fuscata group as is the
endophallic armature.
In the remaining groups, except pumila and collaris » the dark col-
oration of the elytral disc is usually brownish and not black. Of these
groups the fuscata group is probably the most primitive (complete basal
ridge of the elytra, transverse armature on the endophallus, and larger
size). In the lobulata, ornata, and humeliae groups the species are small
and usually the basal ridge of the elytra is incomplete. As the arma-
ture of the endophallus is transverse in the lobulata group but reduced to
a spot in the other two I have placed these together.
The collaris and pumila groups cannot be related to any of our other
groups. In Lebia collaris there is a very strange type of endophallic ar-
mature similar to the Lamprias type in which the spines are arranged in
longitudinal rows. However, there is nothing else to suggest a relation-
ship to Lamprias and it is almost certain that collaris is a good Lebia. In
pumila there is a similarity to the guttula type of endophallic armature but
again there is nothing else suggestive of a relationship.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following gentlemen and their respective
institutions for the loan of specimens. Without their cooperation this
study could not have been made. Dr. Ross Bell, Burlington, Vermont
(personal material) ; Dr. W. Wayne Boyle, Pennsylvania State Univer-
sity; Mr. W. J. Brown, Canada Department of Agriculture; Dr. George
W. Byers, University of Kansas; Dr. M.A. Cazier, American Museum
of Natural History; Drs. L. Chandler and Ray T. Everly, Purdue Uni-
versity; Dr. Edwin F. Cook, University of Minnesota; Dr. P. J. Dar-
lington Jr. , Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University;
Dr. H. 'Dietrich, Cornell University; Dr. H. S. Dybas, Chicago Natural
History Museum; Dr. H. J. Grant, The Academy of Natural Sciences of
Philadelphia; Dr. M. H. Hatch, University of Washington; Dr. T. H.
Hubbell, University of Michigan; Dr. Edwin W. King, Clemson College;
Mr. H. B. Leech, California Academy of Sciences ; Dr. Norman Marston,
Kansas State University; Mr. T. J. Spilman, United States National
Museum; the late Mr. Gordon Stace-Smith, Creston, B.C. (personal
material); Dr. F. G. Werner, University of Arizona; Dr. D.A, Young,
North Carolina State University.
To Dr. G. E. Ball, chairman of my committee, I express my
sincere thanks for his guidance and interest throughout this study. The
many discussions with him were always useful and stimulating although
he never required that his views be accepted and the conclusions reached
are not necessarily the same as his. The two field trips taken with him
proved to be most rewarding, not only in specimens obtained but also in
field experience gained. In addition he generously gave of his time to
compare types and other material whenever he visited institutions where
material important to this study was located. For these, for his careful
Madge
225
reading of the manuscript, and for the many other ways in which he has
helped, I am very grateful.
I would like to thank the National Research Council of Canada
for the Studentship awarded during 1960-61. Without it the field work
could not have been carried out.
Finally, I would like to thank my colleague. Dr. M. W. McFadden
with whommany discus sions were held concerning the problems in Lebia
and taxonomic problems in general. The conclusions reached in this
study have been strongly influenced by these discussions.
REFERENCES
Andrewes, H. E. 1919. Note on Bonelli 's "Tableau Synoptique". Trans.
R. ent, Soc. Lond. 67 : 89-92.
Andrewes, H. E. 1935. On the genotypes of British Carabidae - II. Ann.
Mag. nat. Hist. 16 : 12-25.
Balfour- Browne, F. 1943. The wing venation of the Adephaga (Coleop-
tera) with special reference to the Hydradephaga and some homo-
logies with the Polyphaga. J. R. micr. Soc. 63 : 55-84.
Bates, H. W. 1878, On new genera and species of geodephagus Coleop-
tera from Central America. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 587-609.
Bates, H. W. 1883. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta. Coleoptera.
1(1) : 153-255.
Bates, H. W. 1884. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta. Coleoptera.
1(1) : 261-299.
Blackwelder, R. E. 1944. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mex-
ico, Central America, the Westindies, and South America. Bull.
U.S. nat. Mus. no. 185 (part 1). xii + 188 pp.
Blatchley, W. S. 1910. The Coleoptera or beetles of Indiana. Bulletin
of the Indiana Department of Geology and Natural Resources . No.
1. 1, 386 pp.
Bonelli, F. A, 1809. Observations entomologiques (tableau synoptique) .
Privately distributed. See Andrewes, 1919.
Bradley, J.C. 1930. A manual of the genera of beetles of America
north of Mexico, x + 360 pp. Ithaca, New York.
Brulle, G.A. 1838. Insectes de I'Amerique meridionale recueillis par
Alcide d'Orbigny. In Voyage dans I'Amerique meridionale . . .
par Alcide d'Orbigny. 2 (part 2) : 17-56. Paris.
Casey, T. L. 1913. Studies in the Cicindelidae and Carabidae of Amer-
ica. Memoirs on the Coleoptera 4 : 1«=»192.
Casey, T. L. 1920. Random studies among the American Caraboidea.
Memoirs on the Coleoptera 9 : 133-299.
Chaboussou, F. 1939. Contribution a I'etude biologique de
Hentz, predateur americain du doryphore. Ann. Epiphyt. (N. S, )
5 : 387-433.
Chaudoir, Maximilien de. 1843. Carabiques nouveaux. Bull. Soc.
Nat. Moscou 16 : 671-795.
Chaudoir, Maximilien de. 1868. In LeConte, Synonymical notes on
Coleoptera of the United States, with descriptions of new species,
from the Mss. of the late Dr, C. Zimmerman. Trans. Amer.
226
Revision of Lebia
ent. Soc. 2 : 243-259.
Chaudoir, Maximilien de. 1870. Monographic des Lebiides. Bull. Soc.
Nat. Moscou 43 : 111-231.
Chaudoir, Maximilien de. 1871. Monographic des Lbbiiides. Bull,.
Soc. Nat. Moscou 44 : 1-87.
Chevrolat, Louis, A. A. 1834. Coleopteres du Mexique. Fascicle 2
(44pp.). Strasbourg.
Chevrolat, Louis, A. A. 1835. Coleopteres du Mexique. Fascicle 6
(48 pp.), fascicle 7 (50 pp.).
Csiki, E. 1932. Coleopterorum catalogus auspiciis et auxilio W. Junk
editus a S. Schenkling. Pars 124. Carabidae : Harpalinae VII.
8 : 279-1598.
Curtis, J. 1829. British entomology. Vol. 6, pi. 242-289.
Cushman, R. A. and D. Isely. 1916. The cherry leaf beetle, a period-
ically important enemy of cherries. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. No.
352. 26 pp.
Dejean, Pierre F.M.A. 1825. Species general des Coleopteres de la
collection de M. le comte Dejean. Vol. 1, xxx + 463 pp. Paris.
Dejean, Pierre F.M.A. 1826. Species general des Coleopteres de la
collection de M. le comte Dejean. Vol. 2, viii + 501 pp. Paris.
Dejean, Pierre F.M.A. 1831. Species general des Coleopteres de la
collection de M. le comte Dejean. Vol. 5, viii + 883 pp. Paris.
Fabricius, J. C. 1776. Genera insectorum. xiv + 310 pp. Chilonii.
Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Species insectorum. Vol. 1, 552 pp. ; vol. 2,
517 pp. Kilonii.
Fabricius, J. C. 1787. Mantissa insectorum. Vol. 1, 348 pp. ; vol.
.2, 382 pp. Hafniae.
Fabricius, J.C. 1792. Entomologia systematica. Vol. 1, 330 + 538 pp.
Hafniae.
Fabricius, J.C. 1798. Supplementum entomologiae systematicae. 572
pp. Hafniae.
Fabricius, J. C. 1801. Systema eleutheratorum. Vol. 1, 506 pp. ;
vol. 2, 687 pp. Kiliae.
Forbes, W.T.M. 1922. The wing venation of the Coleoptera. Ann. ent.
Soc. Amer. 15 : 328-352.
Fourcroy, A.F. 1785. Entomologia parisiensis sive catalogus insec-
torum, quae in agro parisiensi reperiuntur. 2 vols. , 544 pp.
Paris .
Gemminger, M. and E. von Harold. 1868. Catalogus Coleopterorum
hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus . Vol. 1
(Cicindelidae - Carabidae), xxxvi + 424 pp.
Geoffroy, E. L. 1785. (New species) in Fourcroy 1785. q.v.
Haldeman, S.S. 1843. Descriptions of North American species of Col-
eoptera, presumed to be undescribed. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci.
Philad. 1 : 298-304.
Hatch, M. H. 1953. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part 1 :
Introduction and Adephaga. University of Washington Publications
in Biology. Vol. 16, 340 pp.
Hentz, N.M. 1830. Description of eleven new species of North Amer-
Madge
227
ican insects. Trans. Amer. phil. Soc. 3 : 253-258.
Horn, G. H. 1872. Revision of the species of Lebia of the United States.
Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 4 : 130-142.
Horn, G.H. 1881. On the genera of Garabidae with special reference
to the fauna of Boreal America. Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 9 : 91-
196.
Horn, G.H. 1882. Synopsis of the species of the tribe Lebiini. Trans.
Amer. ent. Soc. 10 : 126-164.
Horn, G.H. 1885. Contribution to the Coleopterology of the United
States (No. 4). Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 12 : 128-162.
Isely, D. 1920. Grapevine flea-beetles. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. Na
901, 27 pp.
de LaPorte, Francois L. N. de C. 1834. Etudes entomologiques ou
description d'insectes nouveaux et observations sur leur synony-
mie. Part 1, fascicle 1, 1-94 pp. Paris.
Latreille, P.A. 1802. Histoire naturelle, generale et particuliere des
crustaces et des insectes. Vol. 3, 467 pp. Paris.
Leach, W. E. 1815. (Articles on entomology) . In Brewster, Edinburgh
Encyclopaedia. Vol. 9. Edinburgh.
LeConte, J. L. 1848. A descriptive catalogue of the geodephagous Col-
eoptera inhabiting the United States east of the Rocky Mountains.
Annals of the lyceumof natural history of New York 4: 173-474.
LeConte, J. L. 1849. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera from
California. Annals of the lyceum of natural history of New York
5 : 125-216.
LeConte, J. L. 1850. General remarks upon the Coleoptera of Lake
Superior. In Agassiz, Lake Superior ... 201- 242. Boston.
LeConte, J. L. 1863. List of the Coleoptera of North America. Pre-
pared for the Smithsonian Institution. Smithson, misc. Colins
No. 140, 49 pp.
LeConte, J. L. 1863a. New species of North American Coleoptera.
Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution. Smithson, misc. Colins
No. 167, 86 pp.
LeConte, J. L. 1880. Short studies of North American Coleoptera.
Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 8 : 163-218.
LeConte, J. L. 1884. Short studies of North American Coleoptera No.
2. Trans. Amer. ent. Soc. 12 : 1-32.
Leng, C. W. 1920. Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, north of
Mexico. X + 470 pp. Mount Vernon, New York.
Lindroth, C. H. 1954. Die Larve von Lebia chlorocephala Hoffm. (Col.
Carabidae). Opusc. ent. 19 : 29-32.
Lindroth, C. H. 1955. Dejean's types of North American Carabidae
(Col.). Opusc. ent. 20 : 10-34.
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum
classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differen-
tiis, synonymiis, locis. Editio decima. Vol. 1, 823 pp. Holmiae .
Lutshnik, V. N. 1922. Notes on the species of genus Lebia Latr. with
description of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bull.
Soc. ent. Moscou 2 : 69-72.
Motschoulsky, V. 1845. Insectes de la Siberie rapportes d'un voyage
228
Revision of Lebia
fait en 1839-40. Mem. Acad. Sci, St. Petersb. Vol. 13, 274 pp.
Motschoulsky, V. 1850. Die Kafer Russlands. I. Insecta Carabica.
iv + 91pp., 10 tables. Moscou.
Motschoulsky, V. 1859. Coleopteres nouveaux de la Californie. Bull.
Soc. Nat. Moscou 32(2) : 122-185, 357-410.
Motschoulsky, V. 1862. Entomologie speciale. Remarques sur la
collection d'insectes de V. de Motschoulsky. Coleopteres. Etude
entomologique, part 11, 15-55.
Motschoulsky, V. 1864. Enumeration des nouvelles especes de col-
eopteres rapporte de ses voyages. (4-ieme article). Bull. Soc.
Nat. Moscou 37(2) : 171-240, 297-355.
Olivier, A. G. 1795. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des insectes.
Coleopteres, Vol. 3. Paris.
Putzeys, J.A.A.H. 1845. Premices entomologiques. Mem. Soc. Sci.
Liege 2(2) : 353-417.
Say, Thomas. 1825. Descriptions of insects of the families of Carabici
and Hydrocantheri of Latreille inhabiting North America. Trans.
Amer. phil. Soc., series 2. 2 : 1-109.
Schaeffer, C.F.A. 1910. Additions to the Carabidae of North America
with notes on species already known. Sci. Bull. Brooklyn Inst.
1(17) : 391-405.
Schwarz, E.A. 1878. The Coleoptera of Florida. Proc. Amer. phil.
Soc. 17 : 353-372.
Silvestri, F. 1904. Contribuzione alia conoscenza della metamorphosi
e dei costumi della Lebia scapularis Fourc. Redia 2 : 68-82.
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy, xii + 247 pp.
New York.
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology, ix + 667 pp.
New York and London.
Madge
229
Fig. 1, Mentum of Lebia grandis . Fig. 2. Head of Lebia viridipennis , dorsal
view. Fig. 3. Same of Lebia solea . Fig. 4. Same of Lebia lecontei . Fig.
5. Pronotum of Lebia divisa. Fig. 6. Same of Lebia insulata . Fig. 7. Same
of Lebia bivittata . Fig. 8. Same of Lebia abdominalis . Fig. 9. Same of Lebia
pumila. Fig. 10. Apex of elytra of Lebia deceptrix . Fig. 11. Sixth abdominal
sternum and posterior margin of fifth of Lebia viridis , male. Fig. 12.
Same of Lebia pumila , female.
230
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 13. Left wing of Lebia viridis . Fig. 14. Sclerotized area just distad
of vein 3A^ of Lebia sub grandis . Fig. 15. Same of Lebia deceptrix. Fig. 16.
Preapical notch on mesotibia of male of Lebia grandis . Fig. 17. Left pro-
tarsus of male of Lebia grandis , dorsal view. Fig. 18. Same, ventral
view. Fig. 19. Color pattern of left elytron of Lebia divisa . Fig. 20.
Same of Lebia pulchella , eastern form. Fig. 21. Same of Lebia pulchella,
Arizona form. Fig. 22. Same of Lebia bitaeniata . Fig. 23. Same of Lebia
scapula , typical form. Fig. 24. Same of Lebia analis, typical eastern
form. Fig. 25. Same of Lebia analis, Arizona form. Fig. 26. Same of
Lebia scalpta , Texas form. Fig. 27. Same of Lebia solea .
Madge
231
Fig. 29. Color pattern of left elytron of Lebia vittata , pale form. Fig. 30.
Same of Lebia vittata , intermediate form. Fig. 31. Same of Lebia vittata ,
darkest form. Fig. 32. Same of Lebia histrionica . Fig. 33. Same ol Lebia
pectita . Fig. 34. Same of Lebia nigricapitata . Fig. 35. Same of Lebia bivittata .
Fig. 36. Same of Lebia bilineata . Fig. 37. Same of Lebia guttula . Fig. 38.
Same of Lebia insulata. Fig. 39. Same of Lebia fuscata . Fig. 40. Same of
Lebia subrugosa . Fig. 41. Same of Lebia perpallida. Fig. 42. Same of Lebia
lobulata . Fig. 43. Same of Lebia ornata . Fig. 44. Same of Lebia ornata , pale
southern form. Fig. 45. Same of Lebia ornata , dark southern form. Fig.
46. Same of Lebia esurialis . Fig. 47. Same of Lebia calliope. Fig. 48. Same
of Lebia bumeliae .
232
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 49. Apex of median lobe in the subgenus Loxopeza. Fig. 50. Num-
bering system for groups of spines on endophallus in the subgenus
Loxopeza . Fig. 51. Endophallic armature of Lebia atriventr is . Fig. 52.
Same of Lebia atriceps. Fig. 53. Same of Lebia tricolor . Fig. 54. Same of
Lebia subdola. Fig. 55. Same of Lebia deceptrix. Fig. 56. Same of Lebia pimalis .
Fig. 57. Same of Lebia subgrandis . Fig. 58. Same of Lebia grandis .
Madge
233
Fig. 59. Endgphallus of Lebia divisa , left view. Fig. 60. Same, right
view. Fig. 61. Apex of median lobe of Lebiadivisa. Fig. 62. Endophallus
of Lebia pulchella , left view. Fig. 63. Same, right view. Fig. 64. Endo -
phallus of Lebia viridipennis, left view. Fig. 65. Same, right view. Fig.
66. Endophallus of Lebia rufopleura , apical view. Fig. 67. Same, abapical
view. Fig. 68. Endophallus of Lebia bitaeniata, left view. Fig. 69. Same,
right view. Fig. 70. Apex of median lobe of Lebia bitaeniata . Fig. 71.
Endophallus of Lebia pleuritica , left view.
234
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 72. Endophallus of Lebia viridis , left view. Fig. 73. Same, right
view. Fig. 74. Endophallus of Lebia marginicollis , left view. Fig. 75.
Same, right view. Fig. 76. Endophallus of Lebia perita, left view. Fig.
77. Same, right view. Fig. 78. Endophallus of Lebia scapula, left view.
Fig. 79. Same, right view. Fig. 80. Endophallus of Lebia analis, left
view. Fig. 81. Same, right view. Fig. 82. Endophallus of Lebia scalpta ,
left view. Fig. 83. Same, right view.
Madge
235
Fig. 84. Endophallus of Lebia solea, left view. Fig. 85, Same, right view.
Fig. 86. Endophallus of Lebia miranda , left view. Fig. 87. Same, right
view. Fig. 88. Endophallus of Lebia vittata , left view. Fig. 89. Endo-
phallus of Lebia pectita , left view. Fig. 90. Endophallus of Lebia bivittata ,
left view. Fig. 91. Same, right view. Fig. 92. Endophallus of Lebia
abdominalis , right view. Fig. 93. Endophallus of Lebia guttula , left view.
Fig. 94. Same, right view. Fig. 95. Apex of median lobe of Lebia guttula ,
Fig. 96. Endophallus of Lebia abdita, left view. Fig. 97. Same, right
view. Fig. 98. Endophallus of Lebia insulata, left view. Fig. 99. Same,
right view. Fig. 100. Endophallus of Lebia fuscata , left view. Fig. 101,
Same, right view.
236
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 102. Endophallus of Lebia subrugosa , apical view. Fig. 103. Same,
right view. Fig. 104. Endophallus of Lebia perpallida , left view. Fig. 105.
Same, right view. Fig. 106. Eiidophallus of Lebia lobulata, left view. Fig.
107. Same, right view. Fig. 108. Endophallus of Lebia ornata, abapical
view. Fig. 109. Endophallus of Lebia esurialis , abapical view. Fig. 110.
Same, right view. Fig. 111. Endophallus of Lebia calliope , right view.
Fig. 112. Endophallus of Lebia bumeliae , abapical view. Fig. 113. Endo-
phallus of Lebia collaris , left view. Fig. 114. Same, right view. Fig.
115. Endophallus of Lebia pumila , left view. Fig. 116. Same, right view.
Madge
237
Fig. 117. Distribution of Lebia atriventris , north of Mexico,. Fig. 118.
Same of Lebia vittata. Fig. 119. Same of Lebia abdominalis . Fig. 120. Same
of Lebia divisa. Fig. 121. Same of Lebia pectita .
238
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 122. Distribution of Lebia viridipennis north of Mexico. Fig. 123.
Same of Lebia pulchella . Fig. 124. Same of Lebia bivittata. Fig. 125. Same
of Lebia marginicollis .
Madge
239
Fig, 126. Distribution of Lehia tricolor north of Mexico. Fig, 127. Same
of Lebia fuscata . Fig. 128. Same o£ Lebia ornata . 129. Same’' of Lebia cyanipennis.
Fig. 130. Same of Lebia analis.
240
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 131. Distribution' of Lebia solea north of Mexico. Fig. 132. Same of
Lebia pumila. Fig. 133. Same of Lebia biline ata . Fig. 134. Same of Lebia
guttula . Fig. 135. Same of Lebia lobulata . Fig. 136. Same of Lebia collaris •
Madge
241
Fig. 137. Distribution of 'Lebia grandis north of Mexico. Fig. 138. Same
of Lebia pleuritica . Fig. 139. Same of Lebia viridis . Fig. 140. Same of Lebia
perita . Fig. 141. Same of Lebia atriceps .
242
Revision of Lebia
Fig. 142. Geographic variation in femoral coloration in Lebia vittata.
Circles show percent of specimens with the femora largely dark.
Fig. 143. Proposed relationships of the subgenera and species groups
of the genus Lebia.
243
Book Review
V
BORKOVEC, A. B. 1966. Insect chemosterilants . Advances in pest
control research. Vol. VII. 143 pp. + x. R, L. Metcalf (Editor); Inter-
science Publishers.
This is the first volume in this series written by a single author .
It is a refreshing departure from the usual review to the extent that
Borkovec has succeeded not only in reporting most, if not all, of the
significant developments in the field, but also he has given some of the
theoretical background, outlined the development of the field and given
some tentative generalizations about the subject. These generalizations ,
Borkovec emphasizes , are of a very tentative nature because of the rapid
developments in this field.
The foreword to "Insect Chemosterilants", written by E . F. Knip-
ling, outlines the principles and theoretical advantages of the sterilization
technique for insect control. The text includes an introductory chapter
(4 pages) and chapters on "Theory of insect- sterility control method"
(lOpages); "Chemistry of insect sterilants " (27 pages); "Physiological
effects of ins ect chemosterilants " (16 pages); and an appendix (44 pages).
There are 284 references cited in the text. These and an additional 44
references which were "added in proof" provide a (hopefully) complete
bibliography of the work on ins ect chemosterilants up to July, 1966. The
references include not only published works but als o citations of personal
communications and United States patents.
The term chemosterilants, as used by Borkovec, is defined as
"chemical compounds which reduce or entirely eliminate the repro-
ductive capacity of an animal to which they are administered ... it does
not include chemicals which would directly or indirectly interfere with
or prevent mating". Even within the framework of this rigid definition,
the study of insect chemosterilants is a very rapidly developing area and
has been the subject of two symposia; one held under the auspices of the
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in London, England, May
1964, and the other sponsored by the American Chemical Society in
Atlantic City, New Jersey in September, 1965. Prior to the publication
of this book, there had been six reviews of the subject, three of which
were written, in whole or in part, by Borkovec. The rapid developments
in the field of insect chemosterilants are reflected in the dates of the
references in this book: 270 of the 328 citations are from 1962 to 1966;
the earliest references are to three papers published in 1947.
One of the most useful features of this book is the extensive ap-
pendix. Compounds reported in the literature as insect chemosterilants
are listed alphabetically within groups and the organisms upon which
they were tested and the references are given. To find out if a compound
has been previously tested one must know to which group of compounds
the chemosterilant belongs. Some compounds are listed under more
than one group; e. g. 5-Azauracil is listed both as a Folic Acid analog
(table II, Antimetabolites) and as an s-Triazine in the table of miscel-
laneous agents (table III); chloramphenicol is listed as both analkylating
agent (table I) and as a miscellaneous compound (table III). The double
listing sometimes facilitates finding the compound listed.
The appendix also includes a table listing the species reported to
be susceptible to chemosterilants. The references are given for each
244
entry but the chemical tested is not. With very little extra effort the
cross references to the chemical could have been included and the table
would have been more useful.
The volume is well bound, clearly illustrated and remarkably
free of typographical errors. The subject matter is clearly presented
and Borkovec has collected a wealth of material of assistance to those
interested in comparative physiology or in insect toxicology.
R. H. Gooding
Quaestiones
entomolosicae
A periodical record of entomological investigations,
published at the Department of Entomology, Uni-
versity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
VOLUME ill
NUMBER 4
OCTOBER 1967
J
QUAESTIONES ENTOMOLOGICAE
A periodical record of entomological investigations, published at
the Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Volume 3 Number 4 10 October 1967
CONTENTS
Guest editorial 245
Murdoch - The biology of the lilac leaf miner, Gracillaria syringella
Fabr. (Lepidoptera : Gracillariidae) 247
Buerger - Sense organs of the labra of some blood-feeding Diptera. 283
Book review 291
Guest Editorial - The Religious Faith of the Scientist
In the course of lectures given by J. E. McTaggart of Trinity
College, Cambridge, some forty-five years ago, as an ‘Introduction to
the Study of Philosophy*, we were told that *Science is common-sense
systematized*. Perhaps that sounds reasonable enough, but one must
realize that for the philosopher ‘common- sense* is almost adirtyword.
The trouble started with the Greeks, who laid the foundations of philo-
sophic thought, The Greeks discovered geometry and were so fascinated
by the results that could be got in that study by methodical reasoning that
they developed an unbounded faith in the power of human reason, and
became convinced that logical thought could explain all things. Plato
was not alone in using logic to discredit common-sense - a device that
is part of the stock in trade of philosophers to this day.
Later, in western Europe throughout the middle ages, logical
disputation, developed as a fine art, became the pathway to academic
distinction. And when Galileo and his followers refused to play the game
according to the rules and rebelled against this servitude to reason,
refused to argue, and based their conclusions on simple experiments
with limited objectives - it was exceedingly provoking for the scholastics
of that time.
Galileo and his successors won the day, and scholasticism be-
came discredited, only because the new experimental methods and mea-
surements gave results which all the argumentation and classifications
of the preceding two thousand years had failed to give. We are still
living at the height of this Renaissance revolt against reason, which is
the special character of our scientific age.
The objective in the middle ages had been the all-embracing syn-
thesis that would embody all knowledge and all truth. The new method,
the method of science, was to abandon the exaggerated belief in the powers
of reason, and to abandon the attempt to reach ultimate truth; but just
to study by observation and experiment certain limited aspects of the
phenomena around us. Our scientific conception of the universe is un-
believable for the philosopher. It is made up of abstractions - and there
is no denying thatmanyof us getintothe habit of mistaking these abstrac-
246
tions for concrete realities, Whitehead has underlined the confusion
that has arisen from ascribing ‘misplaced concreteness* to the scientific
scheme of things. ‘Thought*, he writes, ‘is abstract, and the excessive
use of abstractions can be a major vice of the intellect*. But the world
of science has always remained perfectly satisfied with its peculiar ab-
stractions. They work, and that is sufficient for it.
Religion was defined by Whitehead as ‘the vision of something
which stands beyond, behind, and within, the passing flux of immediate
things*. The belief of the scientist innatural laws is not so very different
from that; and that is his basic faith. The philosopher has no use for
faith; that is why he speaks a totally different language from the scien-
tist - whose entire system of thought is based on faith. It is curious to
note how long it took for philosophers to recognize this obvious fact. It
seems to have been first clearly pointed out by David Hume (1711-1776)
who wrote of science: "Our holy religion is founded on faith" - a simple
faith that is in the order of nature.
We are all familiar with the small boy‘s definition of faith as
"belie vin* wot yer know ain‘t true.*" That certainly applies to the scien-
tific faith. For the laws of science, which are the immediate objects of
our faith, are not regarded as forever true. They are temporary, pro-
visional or partial truths. For two and a half centuries we had accepted
Newton's theory of gravitation. In our day it has been shown by Einstein
that this theory is not true whenapplied to the universe as a whole - but
it remains a partial truth, convenient for everyday use within the solar
system.
According to the teachings of logic a proposition must be either
true or false; there is no middle term. That is not accepted by the sci-
entist: he works continually with propositions whose truth is subject to
all kinds of limitations and qualifications - many of them not yet defined.
Which came nearest to the scientific truth, Galileo or the authorities of
the Inquisition?
Science started with the organization of ordinary experiences;
these events were conceived as the outcome of general principles that
reign throughout the natural order. These general principles or laws of
causation were arrived at by a process of induction from the observation
of particular cases. But knowledge of general truths cannot be derived from
the data of sense. By pointing this out philosophers claim to have refuted
the beliefs of the empiricists. The scientist, however, is impervious
to this refutation - because, for the purpose of his science, he believes
by faith in the existence of general truths. The theory of causation is
the dispair of philosophy - and yet all our activities, in science and in
daily life, are based upon it.
How far will this scientific faith get us? We do not know; but it
is probably true to say that it will take us much further than we think;
and that the power of science has been grossly underestimated by the
scientists of the past. Karl Pearson in the first edition of The Grammar of
Science (1892) asserts that to ‘draw a distinction between the scientific and
philosophical fields is obscurantism*. That assertion was premature.
Science, however, is founded on faith and lives by faith. Without a deeply
rooted instinctive belief in the existence of laws which reign throughout
Murdoch
247
nature, the incredible labours of scientists would be without hope. We
must just soldier on in that faith to whatever end it may ultimately lead.
Reference -
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1967. The religion of science. Ann. appl. Biol.
60 : 1-12.
Sir Vincent B. Wigglesworth
Department of Zoology
Cambridge
THE BIOLOGY OF THE LILAC LEAF MINER,
GRACILLARIA SYRINGELLA FABR. (LEPIDOPTERA:GRAClLLARIIDAE)
Rita F. M. MURDOCH Quaestiones entomologicae
Department of Entomology 3: 247 - 281 1967
University of Alberta
The life history of Gracillaria syringella Fabr. was followed from 1963 to 1965. The habits of
the various stages were noted, especially the way in which the larvae mined and rolled the lilac
leaves. Population estimates were made in a small area in Calgary. Two ichneumonid parasites
were found, Scambus hispae (Harris) and Itoplectis quadricingulata (Provancher). The effects of
the lilac leaf miner on its host plant were noted. The world distribution of G. syringella and its
dispersal in North America are discussed.
Gracillaria syringella Fabr., the lilac leaf miner , is of European origin
and is widely distributed in Europe. It was first recorded from North
America in 1923. The lilac leaf miner has become an abundant and widely
distributed major pest of lilac {Syringa sp. ) throughmiddle North America
in the past 40 years. It is not restricted to lilac although this is the most
common host in America; privet is also attacked. In Europe G. syringella
is found on ash as well as lilac and privet.
In the 19th Century the lilac leaf miner received a great deal of
attention. Many superficial reports of the habits of this insect were
published. Since 1900 very little has been added to the literature on
G. syringella .
Adults reared from larvae collected in Calgary were sent to the
British Museum of Natural History and were identified by J. Bradley as
Gracillaria syringella Fabr.
I have attempted a complete biological study of G. syringella , in-
cludingits life history and habits, parasites and predators, dispersal in
Alberta, distribution and spread in North America.
248
Lilac Leaf Miner
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION
History and Distribution of Lilac
Lilacs, in the genus Syringa of the olive family, Oleaceae, are
an Old World group of shrubs and small trees confined mainly to Asia
and having no indigenous representatives in the New World. There are
28 species of lilac recognized by McKelvey (1928) , the most popular ones
being the common lilac, Syringa vulgaris Linnaeus (1753) and the Persian
lilac, ^rmga persica Linnaeus.
From evidence collected by McKelvey (1928) on the geographical
distribution and history of the commonlilac itappearsto have originated
in the moutains of the Balkan Peninsula. A plant, identified by Lecluse
in 1576 a.s Syringa vulgaris ^wdiS first mentioned in the literature by Pierre
Belon, the French naturalist, in 1554 while he was in Persia. It is not
known when the commonlilac was first brought into cultivation in Europe
but it was taken, probably to Vienna, from Constantinople not later than
1563, It was cultivated in Paris in 1601 according to Franchet (1891).
From gardens it escaped into the* hedge rows and grew wild. It soon
came to be regarded by botanists as indigenous to various coutries of
western Europe. By 1629 it was cultivated in both the white and purple -
colored forms in England.
The Persian lilac is said by McKelvey (1928) to have originated
on the moutains of southern Kansu, in central China. From here it was
carried to Persian where it became naturalized on hill slopes andbyl620
it was also known to be in cultivation in Venice. The Persian lilac is the
greatest wanderer of all the species of lilac and it is, with the common
lilac, parent c£ the first hybrid lilac, Syringa chinensi sWilld. , better known
as S. rothomagensis Poiteau and Turpin, 1808, which appeared in the Bot-
anical Garden at Rouen, France about Mil . Various species of lilac
are now found all over the temperate regions of Europe and Asia, includ-
ing such islands as Japan and Great Britain.
The date of introduction of the common lilac to North America
is uncertain. While the probability is that it came over with the early
settlers, there is no authentic record of it growing here before the last
half of the 18th Century. Today it has spread over most of the populated
area of the temperate zone of North America.
Distribution of Ash and Privet
The other host plants of the lilac leaf miner are less commonly
infested. The genera Fraxinus (ash) and Ligustrum (privet) also belong to
the olive family, Oleaceae, Their distribution in the Eastern Hemisphere
is very similar to that of lilac though they extend slightly further south
inoto Malaysia. Ash is common throughout Canada and the United States ;
both ash and privet extend further south than lilac. Privet extends less
far north; in Canada it is only abundant on Vancouver Island and along
the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River.
Lilac leaf miner infestations on Vancouver Island were observed
during the autumn of 1964 and were as abudant on privet as they were
on lilac. Infestation of ash was neither observed nor reported to me
during the three years of this study. The most common species of ash
Murdoch
249
infested in Europe, Fraxinus excelsior has never been introduced in any
quantity into North America, being used only occasionally as an orna-
mental.
History and Distribution of Gracillaria syringella Fabr.
The geographical distribution of its host plants, lilac, privet, and
ash, though it does not occur throughout the host range.
Gracillaria syringella Fabr. was noticed by Reaumur in France in
1736. Lilac had been there for at least 140 years so the leaf miner was
possibly present long before Reaumur saw it. Stainton remarked in 1864
that the species were plentiful in England, France, Germany, and Switzer-
land. Today most other countries of Europe and Asia can be added to this
list. Those countries from which no records are available, such as
China, Norway, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Hungary, and the Balkan
countries may also have the insect.
As the first accounts of the lUac leaf miner in North America
were from four localities; Toronto, Newcastle, Guelph, and Ottawa, the
insect must have been present at least a year before this (1923), probably
several, to have covered such a large portion of southern Ontario. It
was reported in 1924 from the Puget Sound area of the State of Washington.
From these first incidences the area covered by the leaf miner rapidly
expanded. On the west coast by 1927 it had spread to Vancouver Island
where it was reported from Victoria and Sydney. It reached the city of
Vancouver in 1928 and the Okanagan Valley by 1941. By I960 it was es-
tablished in Calgary, Alberta. In the east its range included Quebec by
1925, New Brunswick by 1938, Nova Scotia by 1939 and Newfoundland by
1943. It also occurs on Prince Edward Island. In the western United
States it was reported from Moscow, Idaho in 1939 and in the eastern
United States G. syringella had reached Mt. Desert Island in Maine by 1932.
It was found in Philadelphia and New Yorkin 1928 and was well established
in northern Vermont by 1936.
Today the leaf miner's distribution in North America has expan-
ded to include most of the southern half of Canada except for Saskatchewan
and Manitoba where there has been only one report, from Winnipeg, 1965.
Included also is the northern half of the United States except for a strip
extending south from Saskatchewan and Manitoba through North Dakota,
South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas (figs. 1 and 2).
G: syringella is well established in southern Alberta and has been
found as far north as Edmonton. It was found in small numbers in Ed-
monton during 1963 and during 1965 was present here in infestation pro-
portions. It maybe expected to continue spreading northward and even-
tually reach the northern limit of the host plant, lilac, as it has done in
Russia (Strokov 1956).
The lilac leaf miner appears to have beenintroduced to both coasts
of North America at approximately the same time. It probably entered
in the pupal stage in soil around the roots of imported lilac shipments.
Prior to the prohibition of the movement of soil on plants from Europe
to Canada in May 1965, evergreen trees were shipped in soil or peatmoss
and deciduous trees were usually shipped barerooted, though lilacs, par-
ricularlythe French hybrids, were often imported in soil balls. Imported
250
Lilac Leaf Miner
Fig. 2. Distribution of the lilac leaf miner in the United States to end of 1964.
lilac today is packed in peatmoss after the leaves have dropped. The
soil around the roots is removed so it is unlikely that leaf miner pupae
are still transported with nursery stock.
Differential Attack of Host Plant Species by the Lilac Leaf Miner
Not all species of lilac, ash, and privet are infested in Europe
and those species which are infested are not attacked equally. The spe-
cies were separated into four categories according to their susceptibility
to G. syringella attack:
Heavily Infested
Syringa vulgaris L.
Syringa pekinensisKuprecht
Syringa josikaea Jacq.
Fraxinus excelsior L.
Fraxinus excelsior L. var. monophylla
Lightly Infested
Syringa persica L.
Syringa villosa Komarov
Syringa emodi Wallich
Syringa ref lexa Schneider
Fraxinus rotundifolia Mill. var.
Murdoch
251
Ligustrum japonicumThunb.
Ligustrum ovalifolium Hsiss'ka.rl
Ligustrum californicum Hort. exDecne
Fraxinus potamophila Herd.
Ligustrum vulgare L.
(= ovalifolium Hassk. )
Less Heavily Infested
Fraxinus excelsior L. var diversifolia
Slightly Infested
Fraxinus americanaLj.
Fraxinus pubescens Lam. ex Bose
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.
The situation in North America is similar except that none of the
Fraxinus (ash) species in North America are attacked and Ligustrum vulgare
should be placed in the heavily infested category,
C. B. Hutchings (1925), in Canada, made a similar list for var-
ieties ofS. i;t//gans from theArboretum at the Central Experimental Farm,
Ottawa where over 150 varieties were grown. He observed that the lilac
leaf miner showed a marked preference for some varieties while avoid-
ing others entirely.
Preliminary studies were carried out in both Calgary and Edmon-
ton during the summer of 1963 and the timing of the life cycle in Alberta
was determined. Gracillaria syringella infestations proved to be much more
extensive in Calgary than in Edmonton so further studies were done there.
The main study area consisted of the lilac bushes located in north-
east Calgary (fig. 3). It was necessary to be close to the outdoor ex-
periments at all hours. Ten lilac bushes of approximately equal size
(seven feet high and three feet in diameter) were used for most obser-
vations. Three of the bushes, group A, were situated against a fence
and were partially shielded from winds by houses and trees on either
side. One of the bushes, B, was shielded from all except south winds.
It was exposed to the sun most of the day and had warmth from the house
on two sides; the larvae developed more quickly here than on the other
bushes. Groups C and Dwere shadedmuch of the time by houses on both
sides .
In 1964 collections of ten leaves from each of the 10 bushes were
made every six days during the spring generation and every three days
during the second generation. The leaf collections were not random,
but both mined and unmined leaves were included in the sample which
was taken as follows. Areas were chosen from different sides of the
bush; the inner and outer layers, upper and lower sections . The leaves
picked from these areas with eyes closed, were preserved inalcohol and
examined the following winter . As it took at least 20 min to search each
mine this could not be done immediately. In preliminary examinations
it was noted whether the leaves were mined or rolled; if they were mined,
the size of the mines was estimated. The larvae inside were counted and
their head capsules collected from the molt skins and measured to esti-
mate the age of the larvae. The dead larvae were counted. Both the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
252
Lilac Leaf Miner
I 1
10 ft
f
Fig. 3. Study area showing positions and orientation of lilac bushes.
live and dead larvae were examined for external and internal parasites.
Internal parasites could be seen through the cuticle and were dissected
out. All parasites were mounted on microscope slides. The interior
of the mine was examined for signs of mould, predators, and bird pecks.
The patterns of larval frass were also observed.
Temperatures were recorded with a thermograph under the middle
bush of group A during the summer of 1964. Since these temperatures
differed little from those recorded at the Calgary Municipal Airport,
the airport records were used for 1965. Other lilac bushes in the
immediate vicinity were sampled for estimating moth populations and
for dispersal experiments.
Field observations began 14 May, 1964 when several moths em-
erged on a lilac bushaway from the main study area, but collections did
not begin until 26 May when moths began appearing in the bushes under
observation. Collecting continued until 1 October, 1964 and observations
continued until all the leaves had dropped off on 23 October. Attempts
to rear moths on lilac suckers in caged pots were unsuccessful.
Murdoch
253
Although the moths were most active during the early morning
and in the evening they were easiest to catch then because they appeared
to be less sensitive to slight movements of the leaves and shadows as
vials were placed over them. Ten-dram plastic vials with snap-caps
were used to catch the moths singly or in pairs; in these they could be
quickly sexed without handling. The external genitalia were examined
under a binocular microscope (X 12), This was easier than using the
frenula of the wings.
Larvae and eggs were collected by picking leaves off the lilac
bushes and opening the mines in them. Larvae were also caught as they
spun their silken threads and descended to the ground on them. During
pupation aluminum pie pans (8 inch diameter of soil-covered area) filled
with soil were kept under the bushes of group A (fig. 4) and the descending
larvae burrowed into the soil and pupated. After dropping had ceased,
the pans were put individually into muslin bags to await emergence of
the adults. The emerging moths were counted and the pans searched for
those larvae and pupae that failed to complete development.
fence
base of
bush
Fig. 4. Positions of aluminum pans under group A bushes.
In estimations of moth populations and dispersal experiments
there was some difficulty in finding a substance with which to mark the
moths that could be readily seen and yet would not hamper their move-
ments. Many colored powders, both dry and in solution, were tried but
the most suitable was Fluorescein (free acid) , (Allied Chemical Corpor-
ation, National Aniline Division) which sticks to the body and wing scales.
The powder was applied by placing a small amount in a jar with twenty
to thirty moths and then gently shaking it. Care was taken not to get too
much powder on the moths as they were killed if the layer of powder on
them was too thick. In the laboratory, caged moths with fluorescein on
them lived a normal length of time with no observable ill effects. The
dye particles were red and showed up easily with only a cursory inspec*^
tion of the captured moths.
In the laboratory two methods were used to rear the larvae. One
method consisted of placing the lower end of a twig or small branch with
six to ten leaves on it into a small container of water. The top of the
water container was then sealed with tape to prevent descending larvae
from drowning and to slow evaporation. The container and twig were
then put into a larger glass cage covered with muslin. In the other me-
thod one leaf was placed on a very moist piece of cotton in such a way
that any cut edge, such as the petiole tip, was embedded in the cotton.
This was then put on a filter paper which was moistened every other
day, in a covered, plastic petri dish. Excessive moisture was avoided
254
Murdoch
as it encouraged mould formation. Pupae were kept both in the petri
dishes and in glass jars partially filled with soil. The jar openings were
covered with muslin rather than lids to prevent condensation.
Microscope slides were made of all parasite eggs and larvae
using methyl blue dissolved in polyvinyl lactophenol (Esbe Laboratory
Supplies) as a stain and mounting agent.
MORPHOLOGY AND LIFE CYCLE OF GR ACILLARI A SYRINGELLA FABR,
Description of Stages
Egg
The transparent chorion of the flattened, prolate spheroid egg has
a reticulate surface with roughly pentagonal areas separated by ridges.
As the egg develops it becomes opaque and the curled embryo can be
clearly seen within. Dimensions (Table 1) were similar to those prev-
iously obtained by Pussard (1938) - 0. 5 mm x 0. 2 mm, in France and
Maar (1932) - 0. 42 - 0. 54 mm x 0. 19 - 0. 26 mm, in Estonia.
Larva
There are five larval instars, the first three mine the leaves and
the last two roll them. Table 1 contains measurements of the larval in-
stars.
First instar - A newly hatched larva consists of a head and 13 other
segments; 3 thoracic segments and 10 abdominal segments, the 10th
very small. The flattened, wedge-shaped, prognathous head capsule is
relatively large. Thecuticleis transparent except for the heavily scler-
otized mandibles which are light brown. The body contents are also al-
most transparent, all that canbe seen without special lighting is the gut.
There are no legs or prolegs but the thoracic segments bulge laterally
more than the abdominal segments, aiding locomotion in the mine.
Second instar - The head of the second instar larva is still wedge-
shaped and prognathous. The translucent body is flattened and similar
to that of the first instar.
Third instar - In contrast to the first and second instars, the head
of the third instar larva is spherical and hypognathous. Hypognathous
heads are recorded by Tragardh (1913) as typical of external feeding
larvae but the third instar G. syringella larva still feeds in the mine. Silk
is secreted from a median spinneret on the labium and is used to pucker
the mine walls, producing greater depth for the now cylindrical larva.
The body appears light green because of chlorophyll in the gut. There
are three pairs of thoracic legs, each leg composed of three short seg-
ments and terminating in a long claw. There is a pair of prolegs on ab-
dominal segment 3, 4, 5 and 10. The prolegs have one or two rings of
crochets on them; the arrangement of these is described under adap-
tations of larval morphology for mining.
Fourth instar- The body is cylindrical and still appears green from
color in the gut. The head capsule is light brown, through darker than
in the third instar. The mouthparts are of the external feeding type but
larger and better developed than those of the third instar. The spinneret
Lilac Leaf Miner
255
is larger in proportion to the size of the head capsule than in the third
instar probably because a stronger silk is required to roll the leaf around
the larva which has now emerged from the mine.
Fifth instar - The body color of the fifth instar larva changes from
green to a yellowish- white as it matures and stops feeding. The body is
cylindrical with numerous bristles. Fulmek (1910) constructed a setal
map and provided a complete description as shown in fig. 5. The head
is hypognathous and a medium brown color.
Thorax Abdomen
Fig. 5. Setal pattern map of fifth instar larva oiG.syringella- lateral view
X 20 f = thoracic foot, p = abdominal proleg, s = spiracle(after Fulmel^.
Pupa
In the laboratory, without soil, the pupa is found inside a white
silk, oval cocoon measuring 7 to 10 mm in length. The cocoon, as it is
spun naturally under the surface of the soil, becomes covered with soil
particles and debris. The pupa is light brown. Its mouthparts, antennae,
wings and legs lie flat against the body but are not fused to it, though they
are fused to each other. Two pairs of legs are totally fused to the wings
while the metathoracic pair extends beyond the wing tips. The galeae
extend beyond the first two pairs of folded legs, almost to the wing tips.
The antennae lie lengthwise, reaching to the end of the last abdominal
segment. The pupa is capable of considerable movement and if disturbed
a vigorous reaction may be set up in which its abdomen is bent rapidly
from side to side. The pupa has a sharp point at the anterior end which
pierces the cocoon as it wriggles all except the last few abdominal seg-
ments free of the cocoon before emergence of the adult (fig. 6).
Adult
The adult has the characteristics of the genus Gracillaria as des-
cribed by Forbes (1923), The species syringella is not included in his key.
The adult of Gracillaria syringella can be readily identified by the color of its
anterior wings. They are a variegated mixture of grey, gold, and brown
with six oblique bands of yellowish- white. The three apical bands are
outlined in black. The wing span varies from 11 mm to 12 mm. The
forewings are narrow, the width at the broadest point is 1 mm, almost
doubled in the distal half by a fringe of long fine hairs. The posterior
wings are shorter, 10 mm spread, and narrower, 0.75 mm. They are
256
Murdoch
almost surrounded by a fringe of long, light grey, very fine hairs. The
underside of both pairs of wings is light grey.
The head is covered with long, smooth, somewhat erect, white
and grey- brown scales, producing a variegated appearance. The maxil-
lary and labial palpi are also a variegated grey; they are large and pro-
ject upwards in front of the head (fig. 7), The galeae form a proboscis
4 mm long which is held curled at rest. The filiform antennae extend
to the wing tips when the moth is at rest.
The body is completely covered with grey scales, those on the
ventral side being almost white. The abdomenis 3. 5 to 4. 0mm in length
and 1 mm wide.
The legs are also completely covered with scales, those on the
middle tibiae are more dense giving them a bushy appearance. On the
posterior tibiae there are two pairs of spurs, one pair is one-third of
the distance from the proximal end and the other pair is distal in position.
The middle tibiae have only the apical pair, the anterior tibiae none.
Each pair of spurs is asymmetrical, that spur nearer the body being
longer. The femora are greyish-brown, the anterior pair rather darker
than the other two pairs. The anterior and middle tibiae are dark brown,
the posterior tibiae are paler. The anterior and middle tarsi are whitish
witha few brown patches and the posterior tarsi are whitish- grey, more
or less checkered with pale brown patches.
The moths at rest have the thorax elevated by the long legs. The
anterior pairs of legs are held widely separated and directed forward.
The posterior legs are placed against the sides of the abdomen with the
longer inside spurs curving under it.
The genitalia have not been described.
TABLE 1, Sizes of various stages of Gracillaria syringella in mm.
Lilac Leaf Miner
257
4th Instar
5th Instar
4. 58 ± 0.61
(31)
3. 12 - 5.72
0. 54 ± 0. 03
(40)
0.48 - 0.60
5.76 ±0.73
(27)
4.40 - 8. 00
0. 76 ± 0. 03
(34)
0. 68 - 0. 80
Pupa
4. 87 ± 0. 31
(6)
4.40 - 5. 36
Adult d* _ excluding
antennae
- apparent length
with wings folded
Adult $ - excluding
antennae
- apparent length
with wings folded
4. 67 ± 0. 33
(10)
4. 17 - 5. 17
5.92 ±0.26
(10)
5. 50 - 6.42
4. 83 ± 0.22
(9)
4.41 - 5. 08
6. 00 ± 0.24
(9)
5. 75 - 6. 50
Mean ± S. D.
(No. of readings)
Range
i I
I mm.
Fig. 7. Lateral view of
head of $ G. syringella ,x, 50.
Fig. 6. Ventral view of pupa
of G. syringella .
258
Murdoch
Life Cycle and Habits
Habits of the Moth
In Calgary lilac leaf miners overwinter as pupae in cocoons at
the surface of the soil under debris and up to 1.5 cm below the surface.
The depth of the pupae, according to Strokov (1956), varies with the har-
dness of the soil. In Russia he found pupae up to 5 cm deep in soft soil,
1 cm to 3 cm deep in heavy soil and at the surface in very hard soil.
Emergence of adults in the spring from overwintering pupae was first
observed in Calgary on the 19 May in 1963, 26 May in 1964, and 27 May
in 1965. Emergence continued in all three years for about 20 days and
moths were seen for an average of 33 days. This contrasts with the
situation in Russia from 1937 to 1939 around Moscow and Leningrad.
The earliest moths appeared on May 20 and they were last seen flying
onjune 9 (Strokov 1956). In France the moths that emerged in the spring
of 1928 were observed to fly for 25 days (Pussard 1928). Strokov (1956)
found that females lived from 5 to 7 days. In the laboratory I found
newly hatched females lived from 8 to 14 days or an average of 10 ±2. 3
(18) days while males lived from 3 to 5 days or an average of 3. 5 ± 0. 8
(13) days.
Feeding by G. syringella adults has never been reported. In the
laboratory flowers and sucrose-water solution on cotton were offered
but the moths were never seen to feed although watched for prolonged
periods. Other moths (50) given only water on cotton lived just as long.
On five occasions an adult was seen to extend the proboscis and three
had a drop of sticky substance on the tip. The guts of five wild-caught
moths were ground up in Benedict's solution and heated. The mixture
turned orange indicating the presence of reducing sugar. The experi-
ment was repeated with the guts of five laboratory- raised moths that had
access to sucrose solution. A positive result was again obtained, sug-
gesting that some of the moths had fed.
Mating
The newly emerged adults mate at once. Mating takes place on
grass blades, tree trunks and branches and on the lower surface of lilac
leaves, also on objects such as a nearby fence and leaves of other trees.
The moths, following emergence from the soil, were observed to make
their way up to the tips of grass blades where they remained, waving
their antennae. If a moth of the opposite sex walked up the same grass
blade, it turned around before reaching the first one so that their anal
ends made contact and mating occurred. Mating took place in the shade
of the bushes or during evening hours rather than in direct sun light. In
nature I observed copulation to last from a few moments up to at least
25 minutes. Mating was difficult to observe for long in nature because
the pairs walked away from the original grass blades, while still in cop-
ulation, and were lost to view. In the laboratory copulation was observed
to last from 25 minutes up to three hours. Pussard (1928) thought it
lasted a minimum of four to five hours while Theobald (1905) reported
at least two matings of 12 to 14 hours.
Lilac Leaf Miner
259
Oviposition and Fecundity
Strokov (1956) found that newly emerged, laboratory mated fe-
males, under laboratory conditions, could lay up to 248 eggs each. Six
field-caught females from June 18, 1965 contained from 44 to 160 eggs
each, an average of 94 eggs per female. They may have already ovi-
posited. Muslin bags were placed around branches of growing lilac
bushes. The leaves so enclosed were free of eggs. Four newly emerged
and laboratory mated females were placed individually in bags. They
laid from 135 to 170 eggs each, an average of 155 eggs per female.
Twelve female moths field-caught on the first day of emergence in 1964,
caged with one male each, in the laboratory, laid from 53 to 191 eggs
each. The mean number of eggs per female was 111. These moths
were seen to mate, almost immediately, once each but they could have
mated again as the males lived for several days.
A female ready to lay eggs walks about on the lower surface of
the leaf, her abdomen in contact with the epidermis. When she has found
a suitable oviposition site she lays her eggs in rows alongside of a vein.
Each egg slightly overlaps the one laid before it and each is glued to
those on either side. The eggs, being transparent, are not noticeable
in their normal position on the leaf in the shade but they can be seen with
the naked eye in direct sunlight because the chorion reflects the light.
They are usually placed close to a vein, only 5% of the masses found
were near the leaf margins. 56% of the masses were placed close to
the midvein and the other 40% were placed near the main lateral veins.
Maar (1932) workingin Estonia obtained similar results: 50% next to the
midvein, 49% by main lateral veins and 1% beside secondary lateral
veins. The mean number of eggs per mass is 7 ±2.9 (100) with a range
from 3 to 19. Strokov's (1956) results from Russia were comparable:
2 to 20 eggs, average between 5 and 6. Pussard (1928) thought that tactile
setae on the tip of the female moth*s abdomen detect the ridge of the vein
and this releases the egg laying reflex, the ridge acting as a guide to the
oviposition site. Pus sard suggested that oviposition was only initiated
by contact with a vein of a certain size, if it was too high, as in an old
leaf, the site was bypassed, if it was too lowthe site was also bypassed.
This mechanism would account for the fact that very young leaves or
sites too near the leaf margin are avoided. When eggs were laid in the
laboratory on the smooth, glass walls of the cages the rows were irregular
or the eggs were in clumps and not as they are along a vein in regularly
placed rows.
Egg Development
The duration of the egg stage under laboratory conditions at a
temperature of about 70 F is from 4 to 8 days or an average of 5-|days.
Under natural conditions in the spring at a temperature of about 56 F the
egg stage lasts from 7 to 17 days, or an average of l\ days. Pussard
(1928), under laboratory temperatures of 59 F, found that the eggs took
nine days to hatch.
The percentage of egg hatching is high. From samples of 2, 000
eggs observed in the field it was found that during the spring generation,
under natural conditions, 84% of the eggs hatched. Under laboratory
260
Murdoch
conditions the percentage of hatching was 91%, from a total of 420 eggs
collected during the same generation. The 9% which did not hatch in the
laboratory may not have been fertilized. There was never a whole mass
of eggs remaining unhatched; only scattered eggs appeared inviable.
Unhatched eggs remained transparent and flattened out. Empty egg shells
were also transparent and flattened out but had frass trails leading from
them. The difference between the laboratory and field results may have
been due to predation by unidentified mites which were seen in the field.
In laboratory tests, however, the mites could not be induced to feed on
G. syringella eggs. No egg parasites were ever found and none of the un-
hatched eggs appeared damaged by larger predators. There was no
mold observed on the eggs. The reduced hatch in the field is unexplained.
Larval Development
The egg is oriented with the larval head away from the leaf vein.
The ventral tip of the egg is cut open by the mandibles and the larva chews
through the chorion, which touches the epidermis , straight into the lower
leaf epidermis without being exposed on the leaf surface. If the larvae
hatch from eggs laid on the upper surface of the leaf (0. 1% of the eggs),
they are able to survive. Oviposition on the lower surface probably
evolved because eggs laid here are sheltered and because there is no
thick cuticle. The epidermal mine of each newly hatched larva proceeds
in a straight line for a short distance. As the eggs of a mass hatch at
approximately the same time and all the larvae proceed straightforward,
usually all the mines join, producing one common mine for each egg
mass. The first instar larvae in this mine feed gregariously in compact
clusters around the edge (see fig. 8), producing a blotch after they have
moved obliquely upwards into the palisade parenchyma. The second
instar larvae feed alone though stillin the common mine, in the palisade.
The cylindrical third instar larvae consume the palisade, and parts of
the spongy parenchyma, enlarging the mine. The fourth instar larvae
leave only the upper and lower epidermis, then eat a hole through the
thin mine wall and come out onto the lower leaf surface. They roll the
leaf as described below. The fifth instar larvae live in the rolled leaf
before descending to the ground on silken threads.
Fig. 8. Gregarious first instar larvae in mine,
X 80.
Lilac Leaf Miner
261
The larvae on the ground wriggle around until they have reached
satisfactory pupation sites where they construct cocoons. In the lab-
oratory it took about 24 hours for them to build a cocoon and another 12
hours for pupation to be completed. When emergence time approaches,
a pupa wriggles, pushing on the end of the cocoon until it is pierced by
the tooth on the head of the pupa. The pupa is almost free of the cocoon
before the moth emerges. Emergence of the moths developing from the
eggs laid in the spring was first observed in Calgary on the following
dates: 28 July 1963, 27 July 1964 and 3 August 1965. Moths were seen
flying during 1963, 1964, and 1965 for 54 days, 50 days, and 53 days
respectively.
A second or summer generation of G. syringella begins with eggs
laid by the spring (first) generation female moths. During the years
1963-1965 the earliest eggs were observed on 28 July, 27 July, and 3
August respectively. The larvae developing from these eggs pupated on
1 September, 14 September and 5 September respectively. The average
duration of the egg and larval stages in the second generation over the
two years of 1964 and 1965 was 42 days. In the same two years the dur-
ation of the egg and larval stages for the first generation was 41 days.
The pupae remain as such until the following spring (about 37 weeks).
Table 2 gives the duration of the separate larval instars for the spring
(first) generation. The spring generation of most mining insects dev-
elops more rapidly than the autumn generation. According to Hering
(1951) this is because the temperature is higher and the leaf cells have
a higher protein content and are softer at the beginning of the growth
period. Table 3 shows this does not always apply to Gracillaria syringella
in Calgary. Although the cumulative temperatures in Alberta are higher
during the first (spring) generation than during the second (autumn), the
eggs are not laid on tiny, new leaves. The leaves must reach aminimal
length of 35 mm before the moths will oviposit on them. Out of 5 00 meas-
ured leaves ranging in length from 3 0 mm to 104 mm, no leaves shorter
than 35 mm had eggs on them. So the difference in the quality of the
food between the two generations may not be great. This is also shown
by the fact that the frass pellet size and amount voided are approximately
the same in both generations and not, as Hering (1951) reported, greater
in the second generation. The threshold temperature in Table 4 was taken
as 40 F to calculate degree days of development.
HOST PLANT SELECTION
Gracillaria syringella is an oligophagous insect. In addition to the
three susceptible genera of the family Oleaceae: Syringa , Fraxinus and
Ligustrum , the larva is also able to develop on Symphoricarpos (family Capri-
foliaceae), the coralberry, as Voigt (1932) noted; he also observed it on
the Saxifragaceae genus Deutzia but does not say if development was com-
pleted or not. Sich (1911) reported it on Phyllyrea media of the Oleaceae
and Kaltenbach (1874) noticed it on Euonymus , an ornamental temperate
genus of the Celastraceae. Later, Stager (1923) and Maar (1932) failed
to rear the lilac leaf miner on this plant. I observed it on Populus nigra
26Z
Murdoch
var italica Muench. (Lombardy Poplar) of the Salicaceae though it did not
complete development. The accidently infested Lombardy poplars, found
only twice in 1964, were in the immediate vicinity of many lilac bushes.
I have observed other plants used as resting places without eggs being
laid. An egg may have occasionally been carried by an ovipositing fe-
male to another plant.
TABLE 2. Average duration in days of each stage of the spring gener-
ation of G. syringella in 1964 and 1965.
TABLE 3. Average development times for the egg and larval stages of
G. syringella during 1963, 1964, and 1965.
The Lilac and its Leaf
Lilacs are deciduous shrubs. Their leaves are opposite, petiol-
ate, usually ovate, entire, and have reticulate venation with three to
seven pairs of veins.
Gracillaria syringella is found on the leaves of the lilac, leaving the
flowers untouched. Themesophyll of the lilac leaf is well differentiated
into palisade and spongy parenchyma. The palisade parenchyma of two
rows of closely packed, columnar cells is next to the upper epidermis.
It is rich in chlorophyll and is presumably the most nutritious layer. It
is mined by the most specialized first and second instar larvae. The
spongy parenchyma of irregularly placed, open spaced cells is beneath
the palisade layer. It does not have as much chlorophyll. This lower,
more easily penetrated layer is eaten by the later instar larvae. The
Lilac Leaf Miner
263
mesophyll is enclosed in an epidermis that consists of a single layer of
thick- walled transparent cells. On the outer surface of the epidermis,
particularly on the upper surface, a waxy cuticle is secreted. The leaf
is supported by a framework of veins; their hard- walled, lignin- contain-
ing cells impede the leaf miner.
Larval Adaptations for Mining
Structural differences in the larval instars correspond with var-
iations in the habits of the larvae and with their changing environment.
Generally, external feeding lepidopterous larvae have cylindrical bodies,
equally wide at the fore- and hind ends. Theymay bear avarietyof sur-
face structures such as protuberances and bristles. Mining larvae have
restricted living space and they have flattened bodies enabling them to
live in the confined space of the mine. It has been shown (Hering 1951)
that the flatter the mine, the flatter are the larvae. The very flat first
instar larvae are found first in the lower epidermis and later in the pali-
sade parenchyma where they apparently feed on the cell contents. The
flattened second instar larvae in the palisade parenchyma also feed on
cell contents. These two instars cut open a cell and suck the contents
while the later tissue-feeding instars chew up entire cells. The third
instar larvae have the cylindrical body form which occupies the whole
space between the upper and lower epidermis. In many other mining
larvae the thorax becomes heavily sclerotized but sclerotization in
G. syringella remains weak, the fore- end of the lilac leaf miner is only
slightly thickened, especially the first thoracic segment.
There are great differences between the cell-content feeding and
tissue-feeding instars, primarily in the degree of flattening of the body.
The changes occurring in the head region between instars two and three
affect the mouthparts , the shape of the head capsule, antennae, and eyes.
Mining G. syringella larvae are dor so-ventrally flattened. They
must feed on matter lying only in front and to the sides of them. The
prognathous head position is achieved by the elongation of the labium and
genae. The head is wedge-shaped and the extended mandibles at the
anterior end form a point, making it much easier to penetrate the epi-
dermal cell walls. There are no ecdysial sutures as the head capsule
slips off entire, the posterior part being widest. There are only streng-
thening ridges present at the rear of the head (fig. 9). The antennae
are situated in a protective depression behind the projecting mouthparts.
There are two articles. The basal article has a very characteristic
form, being slightly club-shaped and bent inwards. It has two papillae
and two hairs, one very small and the other long and curved inwards at
the top. The upper article is short and has two short, stout terminal
bristles and one papilla (fig. 10). The ocelli are arranged in a marginal
line. Thereareonly two larger ocelli present which have moved forward
slightly from the normal position for lepidopterous larvae.
In the tissue-feeding third instar the mine is more spacious and
the head capsule is hypognathous (fig. 11). The larvae may eat matter
beneath them as well as that lying to the sides and in front of them. The
antennae have three distinct articles: the terminal one is forked at its
tip, bearing on one side a conical papilla covered with sense organs and
264
Murdoch
on the other a small tactile seta, with a small hair between them. The
second article has one large and two small setae and two conical sensilla.
The large median seta is longer than the whole antenna and is curved in
the distal one-third. There are no sensilla on the basal article (fig. 12).
The grouping and number of ocelli are normal with six lying behind the
mandibles in an irregular semi-circle.
Tragardh (1913) and Dimmock (1880) wrote very complete des-
criptions of the modifications that have taken place in the mouthparts and
I will only summarize their results. The labrum of the cell-content-
feeders has three to four distinct teeth on it used in cutting up the plant
tissue. There is a rounded median depression (fig. 13). The mining
larvae move their heads from side to side when eating, thus, from the
shape of the labrum it would appear that it is used as a saw. The man-
dibles are horizontal and extend slightly beyond the labrum. There are
two very long, narrow, pointed and closely set teeth on them. The la-
bium is a thin lamina with an incision on the anterior margin. The hy-
popharynx which has merged with the labium is covered with very fine
hairs. There is no spinneret and there are no labial palpi. The labium
is flanked on either side by the atrophied maxillae (fig. 14).
The labrum of the tissue-feeder s is plate-like, bilobedand on the
edge of the ventral surface are rows of fine hairs. The labrum of the
cell-content-feeders is larger than this in comparison with the size of
head capsule. The mandibles of the tissue-feeders are convex. There
are four teeth on the edge of the ventral surface and a fifth lies inside on
the ventral surface (fig. 15). There is a spinneret present on the labium
and the maxillae have the form common to lepidopterous larvae.
The modification of the larval trunk consists primarily of changes
in the body extremities. The crawling locomotionin lepidopterous larvae
is not possible in the confined space of the early mines. The first two
instars are legless but other modifications give the larvae a degree of
mobility in the mine. There are pronounced constrictions between the
body segments which bulge laterally, especially in the thorax. There
are numerous setae covering the body that also provide some grip on
the sides of the mine. The pattern of these setae is taxonomically im-
portant as the mining larvae do not have the distinct colors and patterns
of the free-living larvae. In the third instar where the depth of the mine
is increased, there are both thoracic and abdominal prolegs. The thor-
acic ones are well developed with one pre-tarsal claw. The abdominal
prolegs are on segments 3, 4, 5 and 10. They have crochets arranged
in a circle with a semi-circle of crochets inside the posterior part of
the circle (fig. 16). Setae are more numerous and much longer than in
the cell- content feeding instars.
The Mine and Mining Operations
Mining larvae are very selective feeders, avoiding tissues such
as the walls of the epidermal cells and the cuticle. They avoid the hard
cells of the leaf veins and reach fresh portions of the leaf by crossing
the veins near the leaf margins where they flatten out.
Lilac Leaf Miner
265
Fig. 9. Ventral view, first in-
star head of G. syringella , x 80.
Fig. 10. Antenna of first in-
star larva x 1300.
larva x 60.
Fig. 12. Antenna of fifth in-
star larva x 320.
Fig. 13. Dorsal view, labrum,
first instar x 540.
Fig. 15. Ventral view, mandi-
ble, fifth instar x 150.
Fig. 14. Dorsal view, lab-
ium, first instar x 750.
I mm
Fig. 16. Crochet arrangement
on proleg, G. syringella larva.
266
Murdoch
The food available is largely dependent on the position of the eggs
from which the larvae hatch. G. syringella larvae hatch from the eggs and
burrow obliquely into the lower epidermis. The larvae remain as cell-
contents feeders in the epidermis for part of the first instar, producing
liquid excreta. The mine is very short (1 to 4 mm) and is not visible
from the upper side of the leaf. From the lower epidermis the larvae
again burrow obliquely through the spongy parenchyma into the palisade
parenchyma and the mine becomes more apparent from the upper side
than the lower. They usually stay in the second layer of palisade though
they may venture into the upper row and return. They moult into the
second instar and continue to mine the second row of palisade. Fragments
of cell walls are consumed and pass through into the frass which becomes
increasingly pellet-like though it is still only semi-solid. The frass of
these first two instars is never found in the feeding area. The larva eats
lying on its ventral side with its anus situated towards the center of the
mine so that the mouthparts are at right angles to the mine edge. Frass
is, therefore, found a length of the body away from the mine edge. This
forms a distinct pattern of frass inside the mine (fig. 17). After the
second moult the cylindrical third instar larvae consume both the palisade
and spongy parenchyma enlarging the mine cavity rapidly. As they be-
come tissue feeders the quantity of undigested matter in the frass in-
creases. Hering (1951) reports frass investigations showing many sub-
stances in the parenchyma cells, e. g. some carbohydrates and mineral
products, calcium oxalate and calcium carbonate are defecated without
being digested. The green chlorophyll granules become darker than in
living cells after passing through the digestive tract but this is only a
secondary change of the chlorophyll to chlorophyllan without the larva
deriving any benefit from the process. The frass is now in the form of
distinct, moist pellets but the pattern present in the first two instars
disappears as the pellets roll freely in the mine. The depth of the mine
is increased by the consumption of the upper part of the spongy paren-
chyma and patches of the first and second rows of palisade. Vaulting
begins with the production of silk threads which are fastened at several
points to the floor of the mine. These threads contract and the roof of
the mine bulges and puckers while troughs form in the floor. Frass
collects in the troughs and some sticks to the silk webbing. With the
moult to the fourth instar the mine becomes of full depth as all the pali-
sade and spongy parenchyma are consumed. The result is that both mine
surfaces are very thin and transparent, consisting of one epidermal cell
layer. The mine is equally apparent from both surfaces. The floor and
roof of the mine are both thinner so they bulge more when the silk threads
strung between them contract, increasing the depth inside the mine. The
depth of the mine now varies from 1 mm to 5 mm. Frass appears in
larger pellets, is less moist and rolls freely around the mine. The fourth
instar larvae do not stay long in the mine at this stage but eat holes
through the lower epidermis and proceed out onto the surface of the leaf.
Figure 18 is an upper surface view of a small mine on a lilac
leaf showing the differences in coloration in the areas mined by first to
fourth instar larvae.
Lilac Leaf Miner
267
Fig. 17. Upper surface view of opened mine of G. syringella showing
larval frass patterns x 7.
Fig. 18. Upper surface view
of small mine on lilac leaf
showing areas mined by first
and second, third, and fourth
instars respectively.
Fig. 19. Cross-section of rolled por-
tion of a lilac leaf.
Fig. 20. Contracted silk threads clos-
ing ends of rolled leaf.
268
Murdoch
The Rolled Leaf
Fourth instar larvae chew channels across the midvein without
appearing to consume the cut tissue. The cuts vary in number from one
to about ten and they are between 1 mm and 10 mm apart. Rolling begins
at the apex of the leaf. Silk threads are strung by the larvae from the
tip on the underside of the leaf. The threads contract as they dry and
the leaf tip rolls under. After these threads have fully contracted, more
threads are attached from points across the middle of the roll outside
to the unrolled part of the leaf. The threads are 1 mm to 7 mm long
when contracted. Some larvae make only a few turns (fig. 19) while
others repeat the process until the entire leaf is rolled. The ends of the
roll are flattened when a series of threads strung across the openings
contract, closing the apertures (fig. 18). Frass produced before the
roll is completed dries out and drops out of the roll before the ends are
closed. Inside the roll the larvae eat parts of all tissue except the upper
epidermis. Since the larvae are usually found first in the center of the
roll, all of these layers are eaten at the tip of the leaf which is rolled
tightest. This is usually where the fourth instar head capsules are found
after the larvae have moulted into the fifth instar. The same feeding
habits are retained by fifth instar larvae which do not limit themselves
to the center of the roll but eat patches throughout. The frass in the
roll dries out very quickly, the pellets are loose, collecting in corners
and in the webbing. When the larvae are ready to pupate they eat holes
through the upper epidermis and proceed onto the outer surface of the
roll. From here they descend to the ground on silk threads.
After the leaf rolling stage is reached the larvae are able to move
to new, uninjured leaves which are touching their original leaves. The
secondleaf is tightly joined to the mined leaf with silk. Most of the rolled
leaves examined had not been mined, indicating that the larvae had moved
onto them in the fourth or fifth instar; 62% were rolled only, 14% were
mined only and 24% were both mined and rolled.
External Appearance of Mines
The color of the mine emphasizes the details of its shape. It is
usually the result of parts being eaten out of the plant tissue. Air pene-
trates the cavities and dries them out producing a different color from
that of the rest of the leaf.
The lower epidermal mine produced by the first instar larvae,
visible from the lower leaf surface only, appears a transparent yellowish
color. The mine is visible from the upper surface when the first instar
larvae reach the palisade parenchyma. It appears light green because
of the complete or partial removal of the palisade parenchyma. It is
only slightly visible from the lower leaf surface, appearing a darker
green due to the presence of the spongy parenchyma.
The third instar larvae produce a mine which is increasingly
conspicuous from the lower surface. The mine appears a lighter green.
The full depth mine is equally apparent from both leaf surfaces as a trans-
parent, yellowish area, since only the two epidermal layers remain.
When exit holes are produced by the fourth instar larvae, or when
a hole is accidently made in the mine, the interior dries out quickly and
Lilac Leaf Miner
269
turns a dark brown color. The walls shrink, become brittle and crumble
easily. This also happens if the larvae die before leaving the mine,
even though there are no holes present.
Changes in the Infested Leaf
Hering (1951) reports that two factors are responsible for defor-
mities and tears in leaves of lilac, caused by mining insects: the degree
of leaf development at the time of oviposition or during mine construction
and the position of the mine in relation to the vascular system. I ob-
served that the lilac leaf was very well developed before oviposition.
As the leaf tissue was developed and expanded near the veins before the
marginal areas and since the eggs were laid close to the veins, their
presence did not stop the expansion of leaf cells. No externally visible
abnormalities in leaf development could be detected. The eggs are laid
along the edge of a vein, not on or inside one and the mining larvae avoid
the vascular bundles so that circulation inside the veins is not interrupted.
Bail (1908), in a study of plant malformations and their causes, stated
that G. syringella larvae did cause malformations to lilac leaves. He found
lobes and indentations that he thought were caused by the larvae eating
the leaf, and curved leaves with damage on one margin which he said
were due to young larvae eating the leaf buds but not entering them. I
did not observe G. syringella larvae in or on leaf buds.
Deformities and tears were noticed, however, in some leaves but
generally there were no mines in the deformed area. A species of the
fungus genus Phytophthora, was found on lilac in Calgary during the sum-
mer of 1965 which caused deformities in a great many leaves. Late
spring frosts may also cause localized injury by killing or splitting the
tissue in the intervein areas so that later the leaves may appear as if
lacerated or torn (Heald 1926). G. syringella seemed to avoid deformed
areas of lilac leaves.
After a mine is abandoned, the thin epidermis above or below
the mine is often destroyed. Air dries out the interior of the mine or
dampness and rain penetrate inside the mine and produce further dis-
integration. Mined areas become brittle and break off in the wind. The
unmined areas of the leaf remain green and alive. Abandoned mines are
hiding-places for many other insects which have no direct connection
with the mines and these can alter the original appearance of the mine
and the leaf.
While larvae are still present in the mine or roll, particularly
in the large late instars, they are hunted by birds which eat out the area
of the mine or roll containing the larvae, leaving large holes and tears
in the leaf.
Two or more G. syringella Mines in one Leaf
The female, ready to oviposit, selects a leaf large enough to
serve a complete egg mass. Usually she does not deposit a second egg
mass on a leaf that already has an egg mass on it. Two mines were
found to occur on 13. 31% of the examined mined leaves, three or more
were present on 2. 92% of the mined leaves. In the ovaries of field caught
females there were 10-20 mature eggs present at one time, enough for
270
Murdoch
two egg masses, but egg masses found on the same leaf were usually of
distinctly different ages; they were probably not laid by the same fe-
male. Different females may each successfully lay one egg mass on a
single leaf. In the laboratory, females were given a choice of a clean
leaf and a leaf with one egg mass already on it. These tests were in-
conclusive because egg masses, in addition to being deposited on the
glass sides of the cages, were deposited on both the upper and lower
leaf surfaces, which very rarely happens in the field.
POPULATION ESTIMATION
Percentage of Infested Leaves
The percentages of lilac leaves infested by Gracillaria syringella in
the study area in Calgary during the spring generation of 1964 were cal-
culated and are shown on fig. 21, The per cent infestations from 3 June
to 30 June were calculated from direct counts of leaves on bushes while
those from 3 0 June to 11 Oct. were from the collections of leaves taken
for larval population samples. There was a gradual increase during the
first generation as the leaves were mined and then rolled. The peak
infestation was on 16 July after which there was a decrease as pupation
began and new leaves were produced by the lilac bushes. The most ex-
tensively damaged of the leaves were shed, contributing to the decrease.
The moths from the spring generation began to emerge and lay eggs on
27 July and the infestation from this second (autumn) generation was not
noticeable until the eggs hatched and mining began. There was no notice-
able increase in the percentage of infested leaves until the leaf rolling
stage was reached. During the mining stage the bushes were able to
produce new leaves faster than mines were formed. Plant growth slowed
down in September and the bushes shed their leaves in mid-October; all
the leaves were lost by 23 Oct.
Larval Populations
During the summer of 1964, 100 lilac leaves were picked every
three days during the second generation as described in the section on
materials and methods. The collections began on 3 0 June, after devel-
opment was advanced and ended on 1 Oct. The average numbers of live
and dead larvae per mine are shown in fig. 22. The mean number of
5. 9 eggs per mass developed into larvae in the first generation. During
the first generation 138 eggs were observed; 9. 5% died after hatching
because they came out onto the surface of a leaf. After this no other
mortality factors were found and by 4 July there were still 5 live larvae
per mine present. When pupation began there were 4. 2 live larvae per
mine, indicating a total larval mortality of 1.7 larvae per mine or 28. 8%.
There was a loss in numbers of live larvae in the mines from 7 July (the
beginning of pupation) to 6 August because of mortality and pupation. It
is difficult to separate loss by mortality from loss by pupation as thelar-
vae drop to the ground to pupate. There was a great increase in numbers
after 6 August as the eggs laid by the first generation moths hatched.
Lilac Leaf Miner
Fig. 21. Percentage of lilac leaves infested byG.synnge//ain Calgary in 1964 (dotted line, left).
Populations of moths on group A lilac bushes in Calgary in 1964 (solid line, right).
Fig. 22. Mean numbers of G. syringella larvae per mine collected during 1964.
272
Murdoch
The greatest average number of live larvae per mine was 6, present on
26 August. The summer generation of adults was spread out from 7 July
to 15 September. The eggs took an average of 7. 5 days to hatch in the
field. The peak in larval numbers appears to suggest that the main batch
of eggs was laid about 19 August. The loss in numbers during the follow-
ing days was due to mortality. The larvae which did not succeed in en-
tering the leaf were found near the egg masses and accounted for 7. 5%
of the total number of larvae. Other mortality factors are discussed
below. When pupation began in the second generation there were 4 live
larvae per mine, indicating a larger total larval mortality than in the
spring. There was a 33% decrease from the peak number to the onset
of pupation.
The numbers of dead larvae per mine were recorded. Moult
skins, even the first instar head capsules, could be found in old, vacated
mines. The body contents of dead larvae decayed and the remains could
not be recognized more than two weeks after death, therefore, the curve
is- not cumulative. There are no distinct peaks in the curve showing
numbers of dead larvae; at no time was there a large mortality. The
slight increase in numbers of dead larvae during the last two weeks in
September was due to frost kill. It is probable that frost kill was more
severe than is indicated by these data because low temperatures slowed
the decay and after preservation in alcohol, recently dead larvae were
difficult to distinguish from those which had been living. In the field,
larvae killed by frost, before decay, appeared similar to live larvae
except that they were very soft. In alcohol, the softness of these larvae
could not be detected.
Pupal Populations
When the first generation larvae began to pupate, 45 aluminum
pie pans filled with soil were placed under the three bushes of group A,
as described above. After the larvae had ceased dropping, the pans were
placed individually into muslin bags and left under the bushes. The 3 09
moths that emerged from the pans were collected; none were from the
11 pans under the outer edges of the bushes. When emergence was over,
all of the 45 pans of soil were sifted for larvae and pupae but none were
found in the outer 11 pans. The other 34 pans contained 94 dead pupae;
74 bare and 20 in cocoons. No parasites were found in them. Dead lar-
vae were not found in the soil; probably larvae which died had decayed.
Moths emerged from 76. 7% of the pupae. The area of the soil in the 34
pans was 11. 6 sq. ft. The area of ground covered by the bushes was
75. 6 sq. ft. If the sample in the pans was representative, then only
1966 moths would have emerged from the total area under the 3 bushes.
The sample may not have been representative because soil-covered co-
coons are almost impossible to distinguish from lumps of soil. Though
the lumps in the pans were broken up, a few of the cocoons could have
beenmissed. It was observed that some larvae wandered before burrow-
ing into the soil. It is more likely that larvae landing in the pans would
wander out, than that larvae landing on the soil surface would climb into
the pans. Thus, it is probable that the pupal population estimate is low.
Digging in the ground under the bushes for pupae was attempted but their
Lilac Leaf Miner
273
size and soil cover, plus the presence of many grass roots made it al-
most impossible to find them.
The pans were also placed under these bushes when the autumn
generation began to pupate. The period between 14 Sept. , when pupation
began and 23 Oct, , when all the leaves were gone off the lilac bushes,
was dull, windy and wet. There were freezing temperatures on 9 days
and the wind speeds were above 25 mph on 10 days. There were 1. 98
inches of precipitation, including some snow. On several occasions the
pans filled with water before they could be covered. The winds dried
up the soil in the pans forming a hard crust that descending larvae could
not penetrate. These larvae crawled over the edges of the pans and fell
to the ground. During the winter the soil in these pans was sifted but
little was found. Larval remains were not seen. Twenty-five of the pans
had nothing in them and the other 20 had only about three pupae each,
none appeared to be alive. No worthwhile estimate of pupal population
could be made for this generation.
Moth Populations
The adult populations were sampled at various times during 1964
from group A bushes. An estimate of the population was made using the
the formula P = NxM/R where, from the area selected, M is the number
of moths captured, marked, and released and N is the number of moths
captured on a second occasion, including R marked ones. This equation
(from Andrewartha 1961) implies that the marked moths, after release,
distributed themselves homogeneously with respect to the unmarked ones
which were not caught and that the recapturing was done immediately
after the releasing, or at least before there was time for any marked
ones to die or leave the area, or for any immigrants to enter the area.
In the spring moths were marked as described in the section
covering materials and methods, released in the morning and recaptured
the same day. Fine days were chosen when the moths were active and
the marked ones mixed in with the population quickly. The recapturing
was done over the whole area of the three bushes. The adults that em-
erged in the spring of 1964 from overwintered pupae were samples on
3 June, 1964. The population clearly increased following this date and
was re-estimated on 10 June. An estimate taken on 5 August seemed to
be at the peak of the August (summer) generation of moths (Table 4).
The population was obviously larger than that in the spring and a larger
number of moths was marked and released.
On calm, warm days, both in bright sunshine and in the even-
ings the moths were easy to observe. Daily observations indicated that
their numbers built up quickly and decreased gradually. A good estimate
of moth longevity could not be obtained. In the field caged moths died
in two days as mentioned under life cycle and habits of G. syringella, but
conditions here were very different from those in the field. Without
accurate data on longevity the total number of moths emerging in the
summer of 1964 could not be calculated, but it must have been greater
than the estimated peak number of 3526.
The total size of the 1964 autumn larval population was estimated.
On 26 Aug. , 67% of the lilac leaves in the study yard were mined and
274
Murdoch
there was an average of six larvae per mine present (fig. 22). At the
end of August the number of leaves per bush in group A was estimated
by counting leaves on branches of various sizes, multiplying each result
by the number of branches of that size on the bushes and summing them.
A total of 5870 leaves was estimated to be on the three bushes; 3933 of
these were mined. As above 16. 23% of the mined leaves examined had
two or more mines in them, so the estimated total number of mines was
4571 and the estimated total larval population six times this or 27,426.
From the section discussing fecundity in G. syringella the mean number of
egg masses per female was 111/7 or 15. One egg mass produces one
mine, so 4571 mines indicate 4571 egg masses, which could have been
laid by 305 females. Thus, the total population of first generation adults
necessary to produce this infestation, since the sex ratio is 1 ; 1, would
have been 610 moths. A very quick, superficial count of the moths in
the area of these bushes clearly indicated a population greater than this.
Large numbers of moths were very quickly counted. Neglecting the fact
that some of the leaves, those shorter than 35 mm, were too small to
support an egg mass, if all the leaves were mined and if every female
laid 15 egg masses, a 100% infestation could be produced by only 391 fe-
males, indicating a total population of 782 moths. The eggs producing
this autumn generation of larvae were laid by the 1763 females of the
1964 summer generation of 3526 moths. If this were the total population,
and it is probably a low estimate as explained above, then the average
number of egg masses laid per female would only have been 2. 59. This
is much less than the 15 egg masses they are capable of producing, there-
fore, the full reproductive capacity was not reached in the field.
TABLE 4. Population estimates of G. syringellahy release and recapture.
Lilac Leaf Miner
275
The total larval population, as calculated above, would have been
27, 426 on 26 Aug. , 1964, At the onset of pupation, on 14 Sept, , the pop-
ulation had dropped to 3. 98 larvae per mine, or a total population of
18, 192. If all the larvae pupated successfully and survived the winter,
18, 192 adults could have emerged in the spring of 1965; this is a much
greater population than the 3, 526 of the previous (1964) summer gener-
ation. In fact, during each of the three years of this study, the number
of moths emerging in the spring was considerably smaller than the num-
ber of summer generation moths. The adult population estimate taken
on 11 June, 1965 at what appeared to be the peak, indicated only 210
moths. The number of moths marked and released on 11 June was small
because of the low population, therefore, the population estimate may
have been inaccurate. In the spring, emergence from the overwintered
pupae is more synchronous than the summer emergence; the peak esti-
mate would include nearly the whole population. Assuming the population
was 210, the overwintering mortality would have been 98.8%. This con-
trasts with the mortality during the pupal stage of the spring generation
of 1964 which was 23. 3%. As reported under pupal population estimation,
the conditions at the time of pupation in the autumn of 1964 were very
unfavorable, the soil surface being alternately deluged and dried to a
crust. It is likely that few of the larvae managed to dig into the soil to
pupate.
Mortality Factors
Parasites
Gracillaria syringella eggs did not appear to be parasitized at any time.
The rate of parasitism in G. syringella larvae was low. During the
spring generation of 1963, 0. 9% of the larvae found were parasitized,
9 parasite eggs and 9 parasite larvae were found. Larvae from the aut-
umn generation of 1963 were not examined for parasites. During the
spring generation of 1964, 0. 19% of the G. syringella larvae examined were
parasitized and during the autumn generation, of the 4, 000 larvae ex-
amined, 0. 15% were parasitized.
The parasite eggs included at least 5 different types, 1 internal
and 4 external, which were distinguished by size, shape, and chorion
pattern. Three of the 4 external parasite egg types were present only
in very small numbers; 1, 2, and 4 specimens of the 3 rarer types and
42 eggs of the most common type were found. There were only 2 different
types of external larvae distinguishable. One of the external larvae could
be associated with its egg because 1 partly hatched larva was found and
4 mature larvae inside the chorion. The as sociated egg type was the one
that was most numerous. An internal larva was found only in a G. syringella
pupa.
Late in the autumn generation of 1964, on 11 Oct, , ichneumonids
were observed to fly around the lilac bushes. Females flew to rolled
leaves and moved their antennae quickly over the surface of the roll.
Then they would either oviposit into the roll, through the leaf, or move
onto a new roll. Some of these rolls were examined; those they ovi-
posited in had G. syringella larvae in them; those left had no larvae in
them. Several of the leaves that the ichneumonids had oviposited in were
276
Murdoch
collected and kept in petri dishes in the laboratory. By 25 Nov, , adults
had emerged from these; they were identified by G.S. Walley as Scambus
hispae (Harris). When the rolled leaves were opened, remains of a para-
sitized G. syringella larva and parasite pupal skins were found. The asso-
ciated egg and larva mentioned above may be S. hispae or a close relative
as the egg is similar to the description of S. hispae eggs given by Arthur
(1963). The larvae appear similar but since they are only early instars
and there has not been sufficient work done on the earlier stages of hy-
menopterous larvae, they could not be identified positively. No parasite
pupae were found. S. hispae is a common external larval parasite of Lep-
idoptera. One S. hispae type larva was found in the spring generation and
16 in the autumn generation. S. hispae has 2 generations per year as does
G. syringella . It is distributed from the Atlantic to the Pacific in the Can-
adian Transition Zone. It has never been reported on G. syringella before,
though it has been found on other hosts in Alberta and could have moved
onto the leafminer from these. This seems to be indicated as the adult
parasites were numerous yet the larval parasitism was low.
When autumn generation pupae were in the soil, on 11 October,
ichneumonids were noted to be flying close to the ground and appeared to
be ovipositing. Some of the ovipositing ichneumonids were collected and
sent to G.S. Walley who identified them as I toplect is quadric ingulata {IP rovSiii-
cher). When the areas where they landed were examined, G. syringella
pupae were found. Twenty-five of these were collected and kept in the
laboratory. On 1 December they were opened; all were dried up except
one in which there was a parasite larva. This was mounted and found to
be in the second or third instar. The head capsule and mouthparts were
different from those of the S. hispae type larvae. It may have been an
/. quadricingulata , a common and widely distributed native species in North
America, is an internal parasite of lepidopterous pupae. It has never
been reported from G. syringella though it has been found in Gracillaria sp.
on Rosa in Alberta.
Parasites found in Europe on G. syringella are listed by Fulmek
(1962, appendix iv).
Predators
Ants, identified by J. Sharplin as Formica neoclara Emery were ob-
served carrying G. syringella pupae and newly descended fifth instar lar-
vae to their nests, at least 20 ft away from the lilac bushes. They were
also seen to climb up the trunks of the lilac bushes but were not actually
seen attacking larvae in the mines.
Lacewing ( Chrysopa sp. ) eggs (4) were seen on branches of lilac.
They were collected and kept in a petri dish with a mined lilac leaf con-
taining larvae. One Chrysopa hatched, devoured the other eggs but did
not touch the G. syringella larvae.
A yellow warbler [Dendroica petechia L>.) was seen by W. G. Evans
to attack mined and rolled leaves, presumably to get the G. syringella lar-
vae out of them. I never observed any birds attacking the lilacs but did
see some marks on lilac leaves shaped like beak marks. In Europe,
sparrows were reported by Pussard (1928) to be predators.
Spiders were the most numerous of the predators to be observed.
Lilac Leaf Miner
277
From the leaf collections preserved in alcohol of the 1963 spring gen-
eration there were indications that two species of spiders were present,
identified as belonging to the Salticidae and Dictynidae. Two spiderwebs
contained the remains of one G. syringella moth, one immature thrip, two
acalypterate Diptera, one phorid and one nematocerate Diptera and one
Hymenopteran. During the summer of 1964, preserved leaf collections
contained 16 specimens representing seven families of spiders:-
3 Dictynidae - Dictyna sp.
1 Dictyna annulipes Blackwall
5 Theridiidae -
2 Salticidae - Thiodina
1 Clubionidae - Clubiona sp.
1 Thomisidae - Philodromus aureolus (Oliver) 1789
1 Philodromus sp,
1 Tetragnathidae - Tetragnatha sp.
1 Araneidae - Acacesia sp.
The specimen of P. aureolus, a male, was kept in a petri dish in
the laboratory from 7 July, 1964 until death on 10 August, 1964. During
this period the spider consumed 2-| late instar G. syringella larvae.
Fungus
Spores and mycelia from fungi found on dead larvae and pupae
were mounted in balsam; they could not be identified. From all appear-
ances the fungi did not cause the death of the larvae but developed on
them later.
Weather
Late spring frost may cause localized injury to young lilac leaves
by killing or splitting the tissue in the intervein areas; later the leaves
appear as if torn (Heald 1926).
Temperatures in the late autumn fluctuated very much; frosts
occurred on widely scattered nights before the freezing temperatures
were continuous. The first frost (Table 5) did not seem to injure the
G. syringella larvae, though the lower temperatures slowed down their
development. Continuing freezing temperatures killed larvae in the mined
leaves when they were shed by the bushes on 23 October; these larvae
were not far enough developed to pupate and presumably all died.
TABLE 5. Frost dates in relation to the life cycle of G, syringella.
l
278
Murdoch
DISPERSAL
The moths marked for population studies were also used to give
some estimate of dispersal. Marked moths kept in the laboratory lived
as long as unmarked moths under the same conditions; an average of
six days. Moths in the field were assumed to have lived at least this
long or longer, and the marked ones could apparently fly as well as the
unmarked ones. On 5 August 1964, 16 of a sample of 195 moths taken
from the bushes of A group were marked. On 6 August, 2 out of 65 moths
in the same area were found to be marked. On 8 August, three days
after the initial release, onemarked moth was foundamong 98 captures.
Assuming that the marked moths were all still alive after three days and
that the population remained stable with no great increases, it appears
that about 90% changed bushes in the three days. Several days after all
three marking experiments the surrounding bushes in the study yard, in
the front yard and in the neighboring yard, were searched for marked
moths. One marked moth was captured 16 ft away from the point of re-
lease and one was caught 30 ft away. Marked moths escaping into the
surrounding bushes were so dilutedin numbers that the chances of finding
one were small.
In addition to the marking experiments, observations of the flight
habits of the moths were made. Groups of between 3 and 10 moths fly-
ing around one another were often observed during the daytime to move
out 5 ft or more from the bushes and return. Individual moths were
seen to fly up to 50 ft away from the bushes on calm days. At the time
moths were seen to fly around the bushes in great numbers; winds varied
up to 15 mph. The moths stayed in the shelter of the bushes when the
winds were over 20 mph. A moth outside the perimenter of a bush was
quickly blown down- wind out of sight.
As reported under geographical distribution, the lilac leaf miner
spread across most of the northern United States and southern Canada in
recent years. This spread could have been accomplished by the moths
flying, aided by wind, or some life stage being transported in lilac. Nur-
sery stock arriving from Europe enters the country at Vancouver, Mon-
treal and Halifax and is shipped to various points in Canada. Until re-
cently lilacs, particularly the French hybrids, were often shippedin soil
balls; pupae may have been in the soil around the roots. After May 1965,
importing lilac with soil- covered roots was prohibited. They are shipped
bare-rooted or in peat moss; it is unlikely that pupae are now transported
in this manner. In local situations, people giving lilac bushes to their
friends do not usually remove the soil from the roots; it is possible
that the pupae could be carried several hundred miles or more in this
way. Gracillaria syringella» in the leaves of bouquets of lilacs could be present
in the egg and larval stages. When the flowers faded they would not be
ready for pupation, therefore, the chance of spreading infestation with
bouquets is small.
The moths can move a reasonably long distance without having
to be transported in lilac. Along the 190 mile stretch of the #2 highway
between Calgary and Edmonton, farmyards containing lilac bushes were
found to be an average of 2. 5 miles apart, the greatest distance between
Lilac Leaf Miner
279
lilac bushes was 10 miles. The moths were first recorded from Calgary
in I960; they were established by 1961 and arrived in Edmonton in 1964.
The 190 miles was covered by the moths in four years, a rate of 47.5
miles per year. Meteorological data from 1964 indicated that there were
only eight days a year during the moth stage on which there were south
winds blowing. The average windspeed for this period was 10.4 mph;
the greatest windspeed was 23 miles per hour, the winds reached 15 mph
or over on six of these days. As indicated, the moths are able to fly in
winds up to 15 mph but some would also fly with the wind and be aided
by it. Daytime activity of the moths around the bushes is described a-
bove. At dusk they were more venturesome and flew right away from the
bushes. This type of activity lasted about two hours each evening. Indi-
viduals, as mentioned previously, were able to fly at least 50 ft in one
flight, without the aid of wind. A group of randomly flying moths near
the northern edge of Calgary was observed; at least some were flying
down- wind, aided by the wind. Under ideal conditions, if they were car-
ried entirely by the wind, G. syringella moths could move, or be moved
20, 8 miles, or four farms away, in one evening of flight. To move 47. 5
miles would require only three evenings of wind-aided flight. Thus, the
spread from Calgary to Edmonton over a four year period could be ac-
counted for by wind-aided flight.
Gracillaria syringella was in Vancouver in 1928, In Penticton by 1941
and had reached Calgary by I960, a period of 32 years and a distance of
about 850 miles. The rate of movement was 27 miles per year. The
lilac leaf miner was established in the St. Lawrence area by 1923 and
had reached the coast of Maine by 1932, a distance of 320 miles moved
in nine years; a rate of 35 mph. It is possible that G. syringella could have
spread across the country by wind-borne flight alone. Whereas the lilac
leaf miner was almost certainly introduced to North America in the pupal
stage in soil, its rate of spread is no faster than could be accounted for
by wind-aided flight.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I should like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Janet Sharplin,
chairman of my examining committee, for her guidance and many valuable
suggestions during the supervision of this study. Thanks are also due to
Mr. J. Packer, Botany Department, for his helpful comments on the
content of the study.
I wish to thank J.D. Bradley (British Museum of Natural History,
London) for identifying G. syringella moths. I am deeply grateful to E. O.
Pearson (Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, British Museum, Lon-
don) for obtaining distribution records of Gracillaria syringella in Europe.
Distribution information from the United States was obtained from many
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Insect Survey co-
ordinators. Distribution information from Canada was obtained from the
Insect Survey records of the Canada Department of Forestry, Forest
Entomology and Pathology Laboratories, Additional distribution data
was obtained from H. W. Goble, Department of Zoology, Ontario Agri-
Z80
Murdoch
cultural College, Guelph, Ontario.
Thanks are also due to various officials of the Canada Department
of Agriculture; Dr. C. W. Far stad (Director , Plant Protection Division,
Ottawa) and Mr. R. Brandrith (Plant Protection Division, Edmonton) for
regulations governing the importation of lilac; C. Copeland (Plant Pro-
tection Division, Toronto) for distribution records from Ontario; A. R.
Buckley (Plant Research Institute, Ottawa) for information on lilacs grown
in the Arboretum at the Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa; Mr, G. S,
Walley (Entomology Resear ch Institute, Ottawa) for identification of para-
sites and Mrs. L. R. Finlayson (Research Institute, Belleville, Ont. ) for
examining slides of parasite eggs and larvae.
My thanks to A. F. McQuarrie (Canada Department of Transport,
Meteorological Branch, Calgary) for the meteorological records of the
Calgaryarea, and to various plant nurserymenin Calgary and Edmonton
for information concerning their sources of lilac supply and methods of
retailing.
I wish to thank Mr. Robin Leech for identifying spiders and Miss
AliseZalums, MissGisela Buergerand Miss Chriss Norgaard fortrans-
lating various papers. Appreciation is also due to Mr. Hans Netolinsky
for the preparation of lilac leaf sections.
REFERENCES
Andrewartha, H. G. 1961. Introduction to the study of animal popul-
ations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 281 pp.
Arthur, A. P. 1963. Life histories and immature stages of four ichneu-
monid parasites of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana
(Schiff. ) in Ontario. Can. Ent, 95 : 1078-1091.
Bail, T. 1908. Uber Pflanzenmissbildungen und ihre Ursachen. Ber.
westpreuss. bot. - Zool. Ver. 30 : 239-256.
Dimmock, F. 1880. The trophi and their chi tinous supports in Gracilaria •
Psyche, Camb. 3 : 99-103.
Forbes, W. T. 1923. The Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring
states. Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station,
Memoir 68, 729 pp.
Franchet . 1891. Rev. Hort. , 308.
Fulmek, L. 1910. Zur Kenntnis schadlicher Schmetterlingsraupen,
Zeit, f. d. landw. Vers. Osterr. 13 : 960-965,
Fulmek, L. 1962. Parasitinsekten der Blattminier er Europas. Dr.
W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands, 203 pp.
Heald, F.D. 1926. Manual of plant diseases. McGraw-Hill, New York
1st edition, 891 pp.
Hering, E. M. 1951. Biology of the leaf miners. Dr. W. Junk, The
Hague, 420 pp.
Kaltenbach, J. H. 1874. Die Pflanzenfeinde aus der Klasse der Insekten.
Julius Hoffmann, Stuttgart, 848 pp.
Maar, A. 1932. The lilac moth, Gracilaria (Xanthospilapteryx) syringella F. ,
Biological observations in Estonia for 1931. Tartu Ulik. Ent. -
Kat sej. Tead. 15 : 1-19.
Lilac Leaf Miner
281
McKelvey, S.D. 1928. The lilac -■ A monograph. Macmillan and Co. ,
Limited, London, 581 pp.
-<CPussard, R. 1928. Contribution a 1‘etude morphologique et biologique
de la teigne du lilas { Gracillaria syringella Fa.hr ,) . Annes Epiphyt.
4(2) : 107-131.
Reaumur, R.A.F. de. 1736. De la mechanique, Memoires pour servir
a 1‘histoire des insectes. Tome II. Fifth Memoire, p. 240.
Sich, A. 1901. Observations on the early stages oiPhyllocnistis suffusella
z. Proc. City Lond. Ent. and Nat. Hist. 12 : 30-48.
Stager, R. 1923. Beitrag zur lebensgeschichte der Fliedermotte
{ Xanthospilapteryx syringella F .) . Mitt. Ent. Zurich i(6) : 368-400.
Stainton, H. T. 1864. Gracillariidae. 8 : 88-99. In Natural History
of the Tineina. Van Voorst, London, 13 vols.
xStrokov, V. V. 1956. Gracilaria syringella F. and its control. Rev. Ent.
U.S.S.R. 35 : 789-798.
;xTheobald, F.V. 1905. The lilac leaf miner (Gracj/arm syrmge//a , Fabricius).
Rep, econ. Zool. 2 : 111-125.
xi^Tragardh, I. 1913. Contributions toward the comparative morphology
of the trophi of the lepidopterous leaf-miners. Ar, . Zool. 8 :
1-48.
;^Voigt,
G. 1932. Beitrage zum Xenophagie - Problem und zur Stand-
pflanzenkunde. tJber den Befall sekundarer Substraten durch
Blattminierer . Z. PflKrankh. PflPath, PflSchutz. 42 : 513-541
Note:
In 1967 the extent and severity of lilac infestations in Edmonton had
greatly increased, and one specimen of ash Fraxmi/s exce/s/or L. ad joining a
lilac Syrmga amwrens/sRupr. wasfound to have eggs and first or second stage
mines on nearly every leaf, and on every leaflet of some leaves. Obser-
vations on September 2 however, revealed no living larvae, and no rolled
leaves ,
Editor
283
SENSE ORGANS ON THE LABRA OF SOME BLOOD-FEEDING DIPTERA
GISELA BUERGER Quaestiones entomologicae
Department of Entomology 3: 283-290 1 967
University of Alberta
The labra of 8 species of Diptera of which one or both sexes feed on blood were studied. All
species have sensilla in the food channel of the labrum. In addition Hybomitra and Chrysops
have 2 patches of basicone sensilla at the tip of the labrum at the sides of the entrance to the
food channel. These sensilla are innervated by single neurons. A similar innervation is found
in setiform sensilla while the basicone sensilla in the food channel of Hybomitra are associated
with larger masses of nervous tissue, suggesting innervation by more than one neuron. Other
sensilla found were of the campaniform type and in Stomoxys of a specialized structure which is
described In species where both sexes were studied the sensillum supply of males and females
was identical, but in some males which do not feed on blood other minor differences from the
females were noted.
Little is known about the sensory supply of the labra of blood-
feeding Diptera. Jobling (1932) described setiform sensilla onthelabrum
of G/ossma pa/pa/?s Rob, -Desv. , but his drawings indicate sensilla with a
structure different from those I have observed. Scudder (1953) described
basicone and setiform sensilla on the labrum of ( ? ) Tabanus quinquevittatus
Wiedmann. Interest in the morphology of the sensory supply of labra
was stimulated by the discovery that females of most mosquito species
have sense organs on the labrum that are not present in the male. This
difference is related to the habit of blood-feeding exhibited only by female
mosquitoes (von Gernet and Buerger, 1966). This paper describes the
labra of various species of Diptera of which one or both sexes feed on
blood.
METHODS
The following species were studied:
Ceratopogonidae
Culicoides variipennis
Simuliidae
Simulium venustum
Simulium vittatum
Tabanidae
Hybomitra rupestris
Chrysops nigripes
Coquillett
Say
Zetterstedt
McDunnough, females only
Zetterstedt, females only
284
Labral Sense Organs
Muscidae
Glossina morsitans Westw.
Haematobia irritans L.
Stomoxys calcitrans L.
Males and females were always treated separately. Between 30
and 70 specimens of each species were examined. The sensilla were
located on whole mounts of the labra. According to size whole specimens
or heads only were treated with 5% KOHin a 100 C water bath for 15 to
30 minutes. The labra were then removed, washed, dehydrated and
mounted in Canada balsam or DePeX. They were examined through a
phase contrast microscope.
When sufficient live material was available the nerve supply of
the labra was studied after vital staining with methylene blue. Various
methods were attempted, none of which gave consistently reliable results.
After staining, the labra were washed, dehydrated, and mounted in
DePeX. The fine structure of the sensilla was studied in sectioned spec-
imens. The mouthparts were fixed in Masson's fluid, dehydrated via n-
butanol and embedded in paraplast. They were cross sectioned at 3. 5,
4, or 6)j,, stained with Mallory's and mounted in DePeX.
RESULTS
Ceratopogohidae
Culicoides variipennis
The labrum of C. yarh‘pen«/s(fig. 8) has a mean length of only 0.25mm.
There are 4 sensilla in the food channel a short distance from the tip.
Their diameter at the base is 2. 5u. Because of their small size no
structural details could be distinguished. No differences between labra
of males and females could be found.
Simuliidae
Simulium venustum and S. vittatum
The labrum of S. venustum is a very fleshy stylet. A cross section
is shown in fig. 10. Sensilla are found on the ventral side at three loca-
tions. There are 4 sensilla close to the tip arranged in a quadrangle
(fig. 9). They consist of 2 basicones distally and 2 campanif or m sensilla
proximally. On the ventral side of the labrum there is a heavily sclerotized
trough which runs along the mid-line of the labrum. Halfway between its
tip and its basal end there are two very large basicone sensilla. They
arise from membranous sockets and are sunk in shallow depressions.They
are opposite one another and are mostly found on the lateral walls, but
sometimes on the dorsal wall of the trough. On either side of the ventro-
lateral margins of the labrum there is a row of setiform sensilla. They
are more closely spaced towards the basal end. Their total number is
around 35.
Males and females have the same supply of sensilla. The labra
of males and females differ slightly in the structure of the extreme tip.
The female has a lobed, heavily sclerotized tooth-like projection on
either side of the tip. These projections are reduced in the male. Instead
there are more bristles at the tip than in the female.
Buerger
285
S. vittatum differs from S. venustum only in minute details of the struc-
ture of the tip.
Tabanidae
Hybomitra rupestris
The labrum of a female H. rupestris {iig. 6) possesses sensilla at
the extreme tip of the labrum and in the food channel. In the lumen of
the labrum there are two canals (fig. 12) which contain the nerve supply
of these sensilla.
The sensilla at the very tip of the labrum are found in two patches,
one on either side of the entrance to the food channel. They are basicone
sensilla with heavily sclerotized pegs. They are hollow, innervated and
their individual dendrites soon combine to one common trunk on either
side of the food channel. Groups of neurons which innervate these sensilla
are found in the canals on either side a short distance from the tip. In
one specimen, nine neurons could be dinstinguished, their distance from
the sensilla on the tip ranged from 0. 128 mm. to 0. 212 mm. There
were 12 basicone sensilla on the tip of that side, but probably not all
neurons were stained enough to be visible. Between the two patches of
sensilla on the tip there is a number of small teeth. Scudder (1953) who
investigated the female T, quinquevittatus did not recognize sensilla at the tip
although his drawing of a whole labrum closely resembles a labrum of
Hybomitra rupestris.
The food channel, which has a minute entrance at the tip, quickly
widens out and then runs as a trough of nearly constant diameter towards
the basal end. Over the distance where the food channel widens out there
are normally four sensilla, a basicone sensillum on either side distally
followed by a setiform sensillum proximally. All four sensilla point
towards the tip of the labrum. The basicone sensillum has a well sclero-
tized peg. The setiform sensillum is an extremely strong bristle on a
membranous base. In some specimens treated with KOH the scolopoid
sheath of the dendrite was visible. The average number of sensilla in the
food channel was 67 in 36 specimens but the number varied from 45 to
102. Where the food channel had expanded fully the average sequence of
sensilla from tip to base was as follows: 3 setiform sensilla, 1 basicone
sensillum with a small and only slightly sclerotized peg, (figure 11) ,
4 setiform sensilla, 1 basicone sensillum with well sclerotized peg, 22
setiform sensilla. All these sensilla point towards the lumen of the food
channel. The space between the individual sensilla increases towards the
basal end of the labrum. The setiform sensilla are small hairs arising
from membranous sockets. They appear to be innervated by one neuron
only, the body of which is found a short distance from the sensillum
towards the basal end of the labrum, similar to the innervation found
in Glossina morsitans. In cross sections showing sensilla the appropriate
neurons are therefore not visible. The basicone sensillum with slightly
sclerotized peg arises from a membranous socket about three times the
diameter of the base of the peg. The nerve supplies of both types of
basicone sensillum in the food channel are similar. The strand of nervous
tissue leaving a basicone sensillum is much thicker than the single dend-
rite innervating a setiform sensillum. Vital methylene blue staining
286
Labral Sense Organs
revealed that the mass of nervous tissue associated with a basicone
sensillum is larger than for a setiform sensillum. It is possible that a
basicone sensillum is innervated by several neurons. Scudder (1953)
working with T, quinquevittatus described the number of neurons innervating
a basicone sensillum in the labrum as four. However, he drew his con-
clusions from cross sections of the labrum. Therefore it is doubtful
that the neurons he observedare in fact, those innervating the sensillum
seen in the same section.
In the epipharyngeal region between the base of the labrum and
the cibarium there are sensilla arranged in three patches , a median patch
consisting in most individuals of 6 basicone sensilla and 16 setiform sen-
silla and two lateral patches consisting of about 17 setiform sensilla each.
The cibarium itself has only 4 basicone sensilla on its posterior end.
Chrysops nigripes
The labrum of a female C. nigripes closely resembles the labrum
of a femaleHybomifra ri/pesirjs. There are similar patches of basicone sensilla
at the entrance of the food channel. The average number of sensilla in
the food channel was 24 in 9 specimens but varied from 20 to 29. Where
the food channel widens out there is on either side a basicone sensillum
followed by a setiform sensillum. The rest of the sensilla include as in
H. rupestris one pair of basicone sensilla with normal peg, one pair of
basicone sensilla with small and only slightly sclerotized peg and a vary-
ing number of setiform sensilla. The sensilla of C. nigripes are wider spaced
than those of Hybomitra rupestris.Th.ere are groups of sensilla in the membran-
ous region between labrum and cibarium and normally four basicone
sensilla on the posterior part of the labrum.
Muscidae
Glossina morsitans
The labrum of G. morsitans is a thin stylet with an average length
of 2. 64 mm. It is nearly round in cross section close to the distal end
and assumes a crescent shaped form towards the basal end. It has canals,
one on either side, through which run the labral nerves. The food channel
is supplied with numerous sensilla. They are arranged in two rows and
are more numerous towards the basal end of the labrum. All sensilla
are directed slightly towards the tip of the labrum. The most distal
sensilla are located about 0. 32 mm. from the tip. Where a sensillum is
present the cuticle around it is thickened. The swelling extends into the
labral canal. This observation differs from Jobling's (1932) account of
G. palpalis. I examined the labrum of G. palpalis and found it very similar
to that of G. morsitans. Nearly all sensilla are of the setiform type. They
are small hairs arising from wide membranous sockets. Each sensillum
is supplied by a nerve cell process the body of which is found a short
distance towards the basal end of the labrum (fig. 14). Only two sensilla
have a different structure; the third pair from the tip, at an average dist-
ance from it of 1. 74 mm. A sensillum of this type is larger than a set-
iform sensillum. It consists of a round membrane without any projection.
Buerger
287
In surface view it looks like a campaniform sensillum. A strand of nervous
tissue is visible in the socket. I was unable to determine the exact rela-
tionship between this strand and the membrane of the sensillum. The axons
of all nerve cells combine to form the labral nerves. The labra of males
and females seem identical.
Haematobia irritans
The labrum of H. irritans is a thin stylet with an average length of
0. 81 mm. The tip and cross sections at various levels are shown in
figs. 1 to 5. The entrance to the food channel lies at A (fig. 1). From
A to B, the food channel assumes the form of a trough which is ventrally
closedby the hypopharynx. From B to D the food channel is almost divi-
ded into two parts by lateral evaginations. Passage of the food from the
ventral to the dorsal part is possible. The dorsal part is richly supplied
vdth sensilla, there are none in the ventral part. The dorsal portion
contains an average of 15 sensilla. Among them are normally two sensilla
which consist of a membranous area with a diameter of 4. 3 microns.
There are no projections from this area. This type of sensillum is inner-
vatedby a thick strand of nervous tissue. In surface view it has a slightly
darker spot in the center which is probably the nerve supply. It looks like
a campaniform sensillum, similar to the one described in G. morsitans .
All other sensilla belong to the setiform type. These include the other
13 sensilla between B and D (fig. 1) and an average of 19 sensilla which
line the food channel in two rows between D and the basal end of the labrum.
They differ from those of G. morsitans in that they arise from small eleva-
tions, the thickening of the cuticle around a sensillum extends here into
the food channel. Their innervation is slightly different, the dendrite is
relatively long and the nerve cell body lies within the labral nerve. The
setiform sensilla are extremely small, the membranous socket from
which the hair arises has a diameter of only 2. 9 microns.
I was unable to find any differences between the labra of males
and females.
Stomoxys calcitrans
The labrum of S. calcitrans is a long, thin stylet with an average
length of 1.75 mm (fig. 7). About 0. 102 mm from the tip the entrance
to the food channel is guarded by a ridge with sensilla (fig. 7). The
number of these sensilla varied from two to five in 12 specimens but was
usually four. Their structure is shown in fig. 13. A sensillum of this
type is set in heavy cuticle which projects towards the lumen of the la-
brum. A strand of nervous tissue extends into the sensillum and ends in
a thickening which is surrounded by a dome-shaped area of thin cuticle.
Posterior to the ridge, sensilla are arranged in two rows for the whole
length of the food channel. The nerve supply to these sensilla runs in one
hollow canal on either side of the food channel. A cross section through
the labrum halfway between tip and base closely resembles one of the
labrum of Haematobia irritans at the same level (fig. 5). Most of the sensilla
found basal to the ridge are of the setiform type. Closeto the ridge there
are 2 campaniform sensilla on either side of the food channel. In one
288
Labral Sense Organs
specimen the more distal campaniform sensilla were replaced by small
basicones.
The labra of males and females seem identical.
DISCUSSION
On the labra examined setiform sensilla were the most numer-
ous, followed by basiconic sensilla. There were never more than two
pairs of other sensilla, usually of the campaniform type.
None of the species in which the labra of both sexes were exam-
ined showed the difference in sensilla between them which was consist-
ently found in mosquitoes. However, other minor structural differences
between the labra of the two sexes were found in some species of which
only the female feeds on blood, but in no species of which both sexes show
this feeding habit.
It may be suggested that the blood feeding habit is more firmly
established as a female characteristic in the mosquitoes than in other
groups of blood- sucking flies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supervised by Dr, Janet Sharplin. I wish to thank
her for her help and guidance throughout the project. Thanks are due to
Dr. B. Hocking for reading the manuscript and offering helpful sug-
gestions. The following persons provided me with specimens: Mr, J. A.
Shemanchuk and Mr. R. Robinson, Research Station, Canada Depart-
ment of Agriculture, Lethbridge, Alberta, Mr. J, A. Downes, Entomo-
logy Reas ear ch Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, On-
tario and Mr, O. Abelnur, University of Alberta, Edmonton. Their help
is gratefully acknowledged. This study was made possible by the finan-
cial assistance of the U. S. Army Research and Development Command
REFERENCES
Jobling, B. 1932. A revision of the structure of the head, mouthparts,
and salivary glands o£ Glossina palpalisRoh. - Desv. Parasitology
24: 449-490.
Scudder, H. I. 1953. Cephalic sensory organs of the female horse fly
Tabanus quinquevittatus WieS.Tn.3.in.n (Diptera : Tabanidae) . Thesis at
Cornell University.
Von Gernet, G. and G. Buerger 1966. Labral and cibarial sense organs
of some mosquitoes. Quaestiones Entomologicae 2: 259-270.
Buerger
289
Figs. 1-5. Labrum of Haematobia irritans,i whole mount x 400. Figs. 2-5 cross sections at
levels A, B, C and E, x 600. For D see text p. 287, arrow indicates sensillum. Fig. 6.
Labrum of Hybomitra rupestris, x 140. Arrows indicate sensilla at tip and in food channel.
Fig. 7. Labrum o£ Stomoxys calcitrans, x 330. White dots are sensilla. Fig. 8. Labrum of
Culioides variipennis , x 370. White dots are sensilla. Fig. 9. Labrum of Simulium venustum , x
260. Arrows indicate sensilla.
290
Labral Sense Organs
Fig. iO. Simulium venusPum , cross section of labrum, x 600.
Arrows indicate sensilla. Figs. 11 and 12. Hybomitra rupestris , cross section of labrum. Fig.
11. (x 740) shows the basicone sensillum with only slightly slerotized peg indicated by
an arrow in Fig. 12 (x210). Fig. i3 . Stomoxys calcitrans, cross section through ridgeclose to
tip of labrum, x 1060. Fig. 14. Nerve supply of setiform sensilla inGlossina morsitansx 930.
291
TUXEN, S, L. 1967. Insektenstimmen. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin-Heidelberg. ix + 156 pp. 88 figs. 11 citations. Price - $3.20
Tuxen begins with a discussion of the somewhat controversial
terminology which has plagued biological acoustics, followed by an
elementary review of the theory of sound.
The dust jacket is pleasing. It depicts a representative of the
most thoroughly investigated group of stridulators, crickets, and it is
with the stridulation and various methods of sound reception of these
insects, as well as the field and leaf grasshoppers, that the bulk of the
book deals with in a very readable, orderly fashion. A concise summary
comparing these three is given in chapter eight.
Other stridulating insects, suchas beetles, Lepidoptera,Hemiptera
and underwater stridulators are discussed more briefly.
Three of the twenty- seven chapters are devoted to insect sounds
produced by methods other than stridulation, including those of the term-
ites, cicadas, sounds in bee hives, and finally a chapter of the method
and purpose of sound emmision by bats.
The descriptions are well supported by figures, and interspersed
among the scientific data are amusing stories and a good deal of folklore
from many countries about "singing” insects.
The biological significance of insect sounds is dealt with in a
justifiably cautious manner, as are some of the theories on the origin
of song.
Since the original publication in Danish, 1964, this book has been
reproduced with new information, including work published on termites
(Howse 1962-64), on cicadas (Strubing 1965), on bees (Von Frisch 1965),
and above all, the sound produced by butterflies (Blest et al. 1963-64,
Dunning and Roeder 1965, Roeder 1965). The author also utilized the
unpublished manuscript about frequency differentiation written by Alex
Nickolson of Copenhagen, and he states that the conclusions obtained
from this manuscript may make some of the theories reiterated in this
book untenable.
Tuxen says that this book cannot mention everything which is now
known, and nothing about what is not known, but that it will try to give
an insight into the problem. Although small, it has achieved this purpose
very well, and is recommended to those with only a casual interest in
insect singers, as well as to those more deeply embroiled.
Angie Burgess
Publication of Questiones Entomologicae was started in 1965 as part
of a memorial project for Professor E. H. Strickland, the founder of the
Department of Entomology at the University of Alberta in Edmonton
in 1922.
It is intended to provide prompt low-cost publication for accounts of
entomological research of greater than average length, with priority given
to work in Professor Strickland’s special fields of interest including ento-
mology in Alberta, systematic work, and other papers based on work
done at the University of Alberta.
Copy should conform to the Style Manual for Biological Joinrnals
published by the American Institute of Biological Sciences, Second
Edition, 1964, except as regards the abbreviations of titles of periodicals
which should be those given in the World List of Scientific Periodicals,
1964 Edition. The appropriate abbreviation for this journal is Quaest ent.
An abstract of not more than 500 words is required. All manuscripts will
be reviewed by referees.
Illustrations and tables must be suitable for reproduction on a page
size of 9%X6% inches, text and tables not more than 7%X4% inches,
plates and figures not more than SV2X^ inches. Reprints must be ordered
when proofs are returned, and will be supplied at cost. Subscription rates
are the same for institutions, libraries, and individuals, $4.00 per
volume of 4 issues, normally appearing at quarterly intervals; single
issues $1.00. An abstract edition is available, printed on one side of
paper or on one or both sides (according to length) of 3X5 inch index
cards (at $1.00 per volume) or on 5x8 inch standard single row punched
cards ($1.50 per volume).
Communications regarding subscriptions and exchanges should be
addressed to the Subscription Manager and regarding manuscripts to:
The Editor, Quaestiones Entomologicae,
Department of Entomology,
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
!
o