. l> A '^
'1K^ -T^N^
m-'-^'
^P'S..
W^-"
*
^^;
■7' ^ ^t^fJ-.^-i'n^
;^s4
•:• Af^
mk<
^' ■¥>.
;Jn^f\
•^ ' A>
j*-^.' iJ
>> /
.1^
^^#'
■;. J-^-rt*^
HARVARD UNIVERSITY.
LIBRARY
OF THE
MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY.
i
THE
TEANSACTIONS
OF
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
OF
LONDON.
SECOND SERIES— VOLUME VI.
ZOOLOGY.
1
^L O N D O N:
PRINTED BT TAYLOR AKD FEANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET :
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BTJRLINGTOX-irOTTSE ;
AXD BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-KOAV.
1894-97.
*
.•<^
CONTENTS.
PART I.— January, 189i.
I. Eeport on Entuinostraca from the Gulf of Guinea, collected by John Buttray, B.Sc.
By Thomas Scott, F.L.S., Mem. Soc. zool. France, Naturalist to the Fishert/
Board for Scotland. (Plates I.-XV.) page 1
PART II.— May, 1894.
II. The Subterranean Crustacea of Neiv Zealand : with some general Bemarhs on the
Fauna of Caves and Wells. By Charles Chilto>j, 3I.A., D.Sc, F.L.S., Bector,
District High School, Port Chalmers, New Zealand. (Plates^'XVI.-XXIII.) 163
PART III.— August, 1894.
III. On a Freshwater Schizopod from Tasmania. By George M. Thomson, F.L.S.
(Plates^XXIV.-XXVI.) 285
PART IV.— February, 189G.
IV. The Comparatice Morphology of the GaleodidsB. By H. M. Beenard, M.A.
Cantab., F.L.S. , F.Z.S. {From the Hu.vley Besearch Laboratory, Boyal College
of Science.) (Plates^XXVII.-XXXIV.) BO.!
PART v.— June, 189G.
V, A Bevision of the British Copepoda belonging to the Genera Brady a, Boeck, and
Eetinosoma, Boeck. jB// Thomas Scott, F L.S., Mem. Soc. zool. Fratice, Naturalist
to the Fishery Board for Scotland, and Andrew Scott, Fisheries Assistant,
University College, Liverpool. (Platcs'xXXV.-XXXVIII.) 419
[ iv ]
PART VI.— July, 1896.
VI. 0)1 .sumc iietc or rai-e Phasmidye in the Collection of the British 3Iuseum. By
"\V. P. KiRBY, F.L.S., F.B.S., Assistant in the Zoological Bejjarttnent, British
JIuseiim, South Kensington. (Plates XXXIX. & XL.) 447
PAIIT VII.— OcTOBEii, 1896.
VII. The Internal Anatomy o/Bdella. By A. D. Michael, V.P.L.S., F.Z.S., P.B.M.S.
(Plates'XLI.-XLITI.) 477
PART VIII.— Pebruary, 1897.
Titlepage, Contents, and Index . . .' 529
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PAET 1.
THE
TRANSACTIONS
OF
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OE LONDON
EEPOPiT ON ENTOMOSTRACA FEOM THE GULF
OF GUINEA.
BT
TPIOMAS SCOTT, F.L.S.,
NATUTiALIST TO THE FISHEnV BOARD FOR SCOTLAND.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOB THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BUULINGTON-HOUSB, PICCADILLY, \Y.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GKEEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
January 189Jd.
TRANSACTIONS
OP
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY.
I. Bejwrt oil Entomostraca from the Gulf of Ouiiiea, collected by John Rattray, J3.Sc.
By Thomas Scott, F.L.S., Nattiralist to the Fishery Board for Scotland.
Read 2iid February, 1893.
' (Plates I.-XV.)
I HE following" Report contains a Catalogue, more or less descriptive, of all the
Entomostraca obtained in the tow-net gatherings collected by Mr. John E-attray, in
the Gulf of Guinea, while engaged as naturalist ou board the Telegraph Steamer
' Buccaneer.'
It is not necessary that I should enter into any explanation of the causes of the delay
in the publication of the Report on the Entomostraca further than to state that the
collections were handed over to me early in 1891, and since then all the leisure that
could be spared has been devoted to their examination aud to the preparation of the
followinti? Catalogue.
In the preparation of the Report the author has to acknowledge the valuable aid he
has received from Professor G. S. Brady, E.R.S. He is also under great obligations to
the Senatus of the University of Edinburgh for the privilege of consulting the numerous
works on Natural History in the University Library, and to Mr. Webster, the Librarian,
who has always been ready to help in hunting up any literature wanted.
My thanks are also due to Dr. T. Wemyss Fulton, of the Fishery Board for Scotland,
for the active interest he has taken in the preparation of the Report ; among other
things he obtained for me the privilege of consulting the valuable Natural History
Works in the Library of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.
The Government Grant Committee of the Royal Society of London allocated to me
the sum of £20 in 1891, and again in 1892, for the purposes of this investigation ; and
this enabled me to retain the services of my son, Mr. Andrew Scott, for the preparation
of the drawings that accompany and illustrate the Report, which, by their acknowledged
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 1
■2 ME. T. SCOTT ON EXTOMOSTKACA
nccuracy as well as their beauty, add greatly to its value. My son also prepared the
greater number of the dissections represented by the drawings, which were necessary for
the satisfactory diagnosis of the various species recorded.
The Entomostraca described in the following Catalogue include species belonging to
the orders Copepoda, Cladocera, and Ostracoda. The first is represented by one
hundred and forty-eight species, the second by two species, and the third by twenty-four
species.
The great tendency to, and multiplicity of, variation observed, especially in certain
groups, has caused considerable difficulty in deciding the value that should be placed on
the amount of variation met with. Thougli care has been taken to avoid as far as
possible attaching a higher value to these variations than they deserved, it has been
necessary in not a few instances to give them specific and even generic rank, in order to
dispose of them in anything like a satisfactory manner.
A considerable number of more or less immature forms occurred in nearly all the tow-
nettings, and were the cause of much trouble during the examination of the material ;
the liability of mistaking an immatui'e specimen of one species for a member of another,
and a different one, is considerable, and has to be kept constantly in view during the
examination of such small organisms.
Since writing this E,eport I have, through the kindness of Dr. T. Wemyss Fulton, of
the Fishery Board for Scotland, been favoured with a perusal of Dr. Giesbrecbt's excel-
lent work on the Mediterranean Copepoda, which has enabled me to make some
alterations that will l)ring it more into conformity with recent views on the nomenckiture
of that important group of the Crustacea ; while the Introductory Remarks by
Mr. Rattray, which follow, will add to its completeness.
Introductory Remarks. By John Rattray, B.Sc, F.R.S.E.
For the opportunity of taking part in this expedition, of the results of Avhich a report
on the Entomostraca is now presented, I have exclusively to thank Dr. John Murray,
of H.M.S. ' Challenger ' Commission. J. Y. Buchanan, Esq., formerly chemist on board
H.M.S. ' Challenger,' accompanied the expedition, and all my Avork was carried on
under his immediate supervision on board the S.S. ' Buccaneer ' (Captain Thomson,
R.N.R.), then in the service of the India Rubber, Gutta Percha, and Telegraph Works
Co., Ld., of Silverto"v^^l, Essex, and at that time engaged in sounding-operations
preliminary to the laying down of a telegraph-eable on the West Coast of Tropical
Africa.
Sailing from Liverpool in the S.S. ' Nubia ' in the begimiing of December 1885, the
' Buccaneer ' was joined by Mr. Buchanan and myself at Sierra Leone on December 23,
and sailed at once northwards, touching on Dec. 24 at Bullama and Bassao, between
the Isles de Los and Dakar, near Capo Verd, arriving at Dakar on the evening of the
same day to complete preliminary arrangements for the soimding expedition, which
started thence on December 29.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 3
So far as relates to the Biological collections, the equipment provided consisted of a
supply of botanical paper with botanical press for the preservation of such larger plant
specimens as might ])c procured on any short expeditions that might be possible on shore.
Such chances were found only at rare intervals : thus gatlierings were made on the
outward voyage at Madeira, in the vicinity of Fuuchal (Dec. 10), at Teneriffe, in and
around Santa Cruz (Dec. 12 and March 28, 1886), at Sierra Leone (Dec. 21), at Conakoy,
Isles de Los (March 17, 1886), at Dakar (Dee. 26-29), at Accra, North Coast of Gulf of
Guinea (Jan. 16), at Sao Thome, Gulf of Guinea (Jan. 25 and 31 and Feb. 1, 1886), at
Principe Island, Gulf of Guinea (Jan. 27), and at St. Paul de Loanda, E. coast of Gulf of
Guinea (Feb. 10-17). On Dec. 13 some algse and shells were procured at Las Palmas,
Gran Canaria, a landing for a few hours only being possible. During the brief calls at
Bullama and Bassao on Dec. 21, the time Avas entirely occupied in the collecting of
marine specimens either floating on the very muddy waters of these parts or occurring
on the beach ; the visits paid to Libreville, Gaboon Biver, on January 28, and to
Bananah Creek, Congo Iliver, on February 7, were so brief that no landing could be
effected. So far as relates to Phanerogams, the best gatherings were made in and about
Santa Cruz and at Sao Thome ; a considerable number of Thalamiflorse were found at both ;
Papaveracege and Coniferte especially at Santa Cruz ; Malvaceae especially at Sao Thome.
At the latter Legiuninous, Kosaceous, Crassulaceous, Myrtaceous, Onagraceous, Samy-
daceous, and Cucurbitaceons CalycifiorfE were well represented ; at the former were
gathered some Ficoidefi) and Uml)ellifera- not obtained at the latter. At St. Paul de
Loanda, Leguminous and Myrtaceous Calyciflorse only were found, e. g. especially
Indigofera, Uialium, Ccesalpiaia, Civtalaria, Tamarindus, and Psidium. Of Fpigynous
Monopetaloid Compositte more were obtained at Santa Cruz than at Sao Thome ; but, on
the other hand, more hypogynous specimens at the latter than at the former, the
Jasminacese, Apocynaccne, and Convolvulacete predominating. Again, Apetake, Nycta-
ginacese, Amarantaceai, Urticacea?, Euphorbiacese, and Monocotyledones — especially
Connacese, Cyperacea^, and Gramineae — were found most abundantly at Sao Thome.
Most Filices were obtained from Principe Island, including particularly species of
Nephrolepis, Nephrodium, Polypodlum, and many young forms. At Dakar and at
St. Paul de Loanda the coast-flora was poor, owing to the vast stretches of sand ; at the
former were observed species of Argemonc, Ihena, Vigua, Cassia, AlMzzla, Seshunia^
Jussicea, Selioti-opium, Clerodendron, Hgptis, Scirpus, CIdorls, Pennisetum, Peiiicllkwia,
Andropogou, Ccnchrus, not obtained at the latter, which, on the other hand, yielded
species of Sesuvmm, Slda, Trlbuhis, Ilonetia, Indigofera, Psidium, Pluchea, Dichoma,
Ipomcea, Boerhaavia, Bougainvlllea, Centema, Pupalia, Phyllanthus, Euphorhiu,
Panicum, Sporoholiis, Enigrostis, Aristida, &c., not found at Dakar.
Much difficidty was experienced in protecting specimens against the hot moist
atmosphere of the tropics, and recourse was ultimately had to having them deposited near
the furnaces of the steamer. This at length proved effective, but was accompained by the
accumulation of much dust, which might, however, have been largely avoided by wrajjpin'--
in fine muslin, had that been available.
1*
4 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Among Algte specially noteworthy were the exuberant growths of Corallinge near
Las Palmas, attached to a soft sandstone on a narrow isthmus joining the volcanic
sections of the island, and of Pad'ma (Adanson) on the beach, about 3 miles from Dakar,
at the far side of the bay surrounding Goree Island.
Per the preservation of zoological specimens the following means were at hand : —
methylated spirit, alsolute alcohol, glycerine, benzole, ether, chloroform, acetic acid,
ammonia, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, nitric acid, corrosive sublimate, caustic
potash, osmic acid, chromic acid, j)icric acid, iodine, picrocarmine, hsematoxylin, Canada
balsam; with accessories such as slides, cover-glasses, watch-glasses, porcelain dishes,
spirit-lamj), camel-hair brushes, needles, spatulas, two nets of varying degrees of fineness,
a tank-box, shrimp-ti*awls, mud-bags, and specimen bottles. Some 200 bottles of 4-oz.
capacity, in addition to several boxfuls of others of larger sizes. At the end of the work
all the available bottles were filled, and as many others as could be obtained empty from.
the supplies of the ship.
Many micro-preparations were made of the products of the soundings, of which 411
were taken during the cruise, and of the contents of the tow-nets at various points.
Larger specimens, such as species of Pisces, were procured from native fishermen at
St. Paul de Loanda, and for these the tank-box proved very u.seful. Larger Crustacea,
of which a few were fouud on shore, were preserved in spirit at once. Numerous shells
of Mollusca were obtained dry ; but one of the most important departments of the work
was the preservation of the more delicate Arthropoda (Copepoda, Amphipoda, Schizopoda,
&c.), Ascidia, ova, fish-larvce, Sag'Uta, &c., found in the tow-net gatherings. Por these the
methods adopted were essentially those practised at the zoological stations of Naples * and
elsewhere. Por delicate objects, Prof. E. R. Lankester had recommended, in a letter to
Dr. John Murray, two plans : (a) corrosive sublimate followed by dilute then stronger
alcohol, and (/3) ^ per cent, osmic acid, or this mixed with very dilute chromic acia
or acetic acid, giving a short exposure of 1 to 2 minutes according to size : this to be
followed by alcohols of increasing strength. The latter method was recommended for
Olione and other Pteropoda ; it was adopted but rarely, owing to the difficulty of prose-
cuting many different methods in a limited amount of space (the laboratory at command
being quite small, but very compact) the combined chrom-osmic or aceto-osmic plans
were not tried at all : the former method was freely used. For the Radiolaria the osmic
acid process also proved of use, it had been recommended by Hartwig and by Haeckel ;
but a glycerine medium to follow it was not employed because of the unsuitability of
its refractive index to that of the E-adiolarian skeleton.
For preserving the products of the tow-net pure alcohol was never adopted ab initio,
but acidulated alcohol was tried, following the directions of Paul Mayer and Whitman,
viz. 70 or 80 per cent, alcohol with a small addition of pure hydrochloric acid and a trace
of picric acid. The specimens were subsequently washed with strong spirit to remove
the acid, and preserved in spirit. Again, the picrosulphuric acid method following
* Mayer, Mittheil. zool. Stat. Neap. ii. (1S31) p. 1 ; Journ. Eoy. Micr. Soc. u. s. ii. (1882) p. 866.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 5
Kleinenberg's * formula, as adopted by Mayer f , that is, without the addition of creosote,
was often used, because of its reported high degree of penetrability for chitinized
structures. The fixing agent was simply added to the sea-water, and this was subse-
quently succeeded by increasing strengths of spirit. Mayer's J pier o- hydrochloric acid
method was only employed a few times.
Corrosive sublimate was extensively used, and was found to be of special service on
account of the rapidity of its action. Lang's § methods were simplified and accelerated
by adding a little of the solid salt to the sea-water ; the hot solution of the salt was
never adopted, though it has been recommended for Sagitta, Copepoda, ScqMrina, and
other Arthropod larvte. In a few cases, following Carnoy || , a trace of acetic acid was
added to the corrosive solution. The mercuric salt was removed by subsequent washing
— the mode of filtration was found of advantage from its speed and cleanliness — and
successive treatment with progressive strengths of spirit. The animals were in all cases,
where preservation was required, killed as rapidly as possible after capture, with a view
to the obtaining of good results for structural purposes.
Tow-net collections were made throvighout the whole course of the voyage ; the total
number of these was, however, somewhat less than the total number of soundings,
because (1) soundings were sometimes taken with much speed in shallow depths, and the
delay of the steamer was therefore brief ; (2) tow-net gatherings could not continuou.sly
be obtained by night and by day, save only at intervals. During work only one net was
really lost through the snapping of gear belonging to the net itself, a few others, usually
in deep water, w^ere lost on account of the breaking of the cable upon which they were
attached.
The majority of the gatherings were made in the upper strata of the water, or say
down to 25 fathoms ; but deep-sea nets were repeatedly used. The deepest w^ere wrought
at 360 and t60 fathoms on January 22, in lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E.
Prof. Chrystal's double-hooped net was used at a depth of 260 fms., but the collection
obtained was small. On Feb. 5, in lat. 4° 26' 7" S., long. 10° 1' 8" E., two nets were set
adrift at 235, 185, and 85 fathoms attached to balloon buoys in a S. ^ W. current of
0-54 knots ; and, again, similarly on Feb. 22, in lat. 5° 59' 4" S., long. 3° 49' 4" E., a series
of nets were exposed at 30, 40, 70, 100, 130, 160, 190, and 200 fms.,— the temperatures at
these respective depths being 6r-3 F., 59"-3 F., 57°-5 F., 55° F., 52°-5 F., 49° F., and
46°"7 F. ; but in heaving up, after an exposure of 7 hours, the cable snapped, and all but
the uppermost were lost. Three more deep-sea nets were lost by the breaking of a steel
rope attached to an anchor-dredge in lat. 5° 5 1' S., long. 11° 48' W., when, out of 1780
fms. of rope, 1675 fms. were lost together with the anchor-dredge, weighing 5 cwt. 2 qrs.
14 lbs. These accidents were specially to be regretted by reason of the opportunities
* Foster and Balfour, Embryol.
t Journ. Roj'. llicr. Soc. n. s. ii. (1882) p. 867.
+ Mittheil. zool. Stat. Neap. 1881, p, 5.
§ Zool. Anzeig. 1878, p. 79.
II La Biol. Celhilaire, p. It.j.
Q ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
they presented for ascertaining something of life at these depths. In lat. 0' 7' 8" S.,
lono-. 14° 28' 6 " "W., nets were employed at intervals down to 100 fms. on March 10 ;
and again on March 11, down to 76 fms., in lat. 0° 0' 7" N., long. 13° 4' W.
The time of exposure of tow-nets varied with circumstances and opportunities from 20
minutes to 7 hours (the latter when sent adrift from the ship). Inshore nets taken at
Conakoy, Isles de Los, Bullama, Bassao, Dakar, Accra, off Little Bassam, in the vicinity
of the suhmarine gully known as the " bottomless pit," Porto Novo, Libreville (Gaboon
River), Bananah Creek (Congo River), and St. Paul de Loanda were always at or near
the surface. Of special interest is the series procured during soundings in the vicinity
of the Congo canon, where gyrations of the water, accompanied by the production of
coarse bubbles of foam, were very evident on the surface of the sea.
For Ascidia, Prof. Herdman had recommended three plans, all of which were employed,
viz. : (1) picric acid and alcohol ; (2) osmic acid and alcohol ; and (3) picric acid alone,
without alcohol, for Saljjcs and Doliolmn. Some were also preserved in glycerine,
without either picric acid or spirit to prevent opacity. Por living specimens of sclero-
dermic corals, of which only a few were obtained, the corrosive sublimate treatment
was employed. No Hydrozoa were preserved, according to Pagenstecher's * method, by
the use of sodium chloride and alum succeeded by stronger and stronger alcohols. Por
the Peridinidffi, of which several were obtained, Gcza Entz'sf recommendation of
glycerine was not followed, though tried, chiefly on account of refractive considerations.
Porifera have been treated by Keller % with osmic and chromic acids, the former of the
strength of -^-(,- to ro pei' cent., the latter very dilute ; but of these, the only repre-
sentatives obtained were found on the shore at Ascension Island, and were immediately
placed in spirit.
Subjoined is a list of the positions of the 48 stations of the expedition, where the best
available means were adopted for obtaining collections, with the sru'face temperature
observed at each : —
Station I. Dec. 29, 1885, lat. l.r 48' N., loug. 19° 18' W. (75° F.).
II. Jan. 1, 1886, lat. 7° 54 N., long. 17° 25' W. (82°-2 F.).
lat. 7° 1' N., long. 15° 54 W. (82°-9 F.).
lat. 7° 33' N., long. 15° 18' W. (83° F.).
lat. 7° 20' N., long. 13° 26' W. (83°-2 F.).
lat. 7° 8' N., long. 13° 27' W. (83°-4. F.).
lat. 5° 48' N., long. 14° 20' W. (85°-5 F.).
lat. 3° 57' 2" N., loug. 7° 42' 8" W. (82°-8 F.). Here a S.E. current
down to 150 fms.
* Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xvii. (1S67) p. 379.
t Zool. Anzeig. 1881, p. 575.
X Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. xxx. p. 568.
FEOM THE GCJLF OF GUINEA.
Station IX. Jau.10,1886, lat. 3° 0' 8" N., long. 7^ 43' W. (83° F.). Station in and near outer
edge of Guinea current. Water ultramarine.
lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3° 12' W. (83°-7 F.).
lat. 5° 15' 4" N., long. 3° 10' E. (83°-2 F.).
lat. 4° 12' 7" N., long. 3° 57' 5" E. (82°-7 F.). A strong N.N.W.
current 2 to 3 fms. deep, and under it a strong current in opposite
direction,
lat. 3° 55' 3" N., long. 4° 7' 3" E. (83°-2 F.).
lat. 2^ 20' 2" N., long. 5' 7' 8" E. (82°-2 F.).
lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5= 55' 5" E. (82°-9 F.). Current N. 37'= W.=
0-72 knots,
lat. 0'' 38' 6" N., long. 6" 25' 8" E. (82'"-9 F.).
lat. 0° 21' 1" N., long. 7° 33' E. (83'' F.).
lat. 1= 22' 2" S., long. 7° 45' E. (81°-4 F.).
lat. 1° r/ 2" S., long. 8° 10' 4" E. (83° F.).
lat. 1° 1' 2" S., long. 8° 19' 7" E. (82°-8 F.).
lat. 2° 39' S., long. 8° 58' E. (81°-7 F.). A floating island near this,
lat. 2° 47' S., long. 8° 46' E. (82°-7 F.).
lat. 4° 26' 7" S., long. 10^ 1' 8" E. (82°-l F.). Current S. 4 W.=0-54
knots.
X. „ 13,
XL „ 19,
XII. „ 20,
XIII. „ „
XIV. „ 21,
XV. „ 22,
XVI 23
XVII. „ 29,
XVIII. Feb. 3,
XIX. „ „
^Y.v. „ „
XXI. „ 4,
XXII. „ „
XXIII. „ 5,
, XXIV.
,, XXV.
, XXVI.
„ XXVII.
„ XXVIII.
„ XXIX.
„ XXX.
„ XXXI.
„ XXXII.
„ XXXIII.
„ XXXIV.
„ XXXV.
„ XXXVI.
„ XXXVII.
XXXVIII.
„ XXXIX.
XL.
XLI.
„ XLII.
„ XLIII.
„ XLIV.
„ XLV.
„ XLVI.
„ XLVII.
„ XLVIII.
„ 6, „ lat. 5° 54' S., long. 11° 33' E. (82= F.).
0
„ 19,
„ 20,
„ 21,
!> !>
90
„ 23,
24
or;
,, ~j,
26
„ 27,
„ 28,
Mar. 5,
„ 6,
„ 7,
0
„ 10,
„ 11,
„ 12,
„ 13,
lat. 5° 55' 8" S., long. 11° 50' 3" E. (84°-2 F.),
lat. 8° 8' 2" S., long. 12° 29' 4" E. (79°-8 F.).
lat. 5° 9' S., long. 10° 43' E. (82°-3 F.).
lat. 5° 51' 7" S., long. 8° 36' 5" E. (83°-3 F.).
lat. 5° 47' 7" S., long. 6° 49' 5" E. (82°-2 F.).
lat. .5° 50' 9" S., long. 5° 1' 4" E. (81°-7 F.).
lat. 5° 59' 4" S., long. 3° 49' 4" E. (83° F.).
lat. 6° 2' 2" S., long. 1° 50' 7" E. (81°-8 F.).
lat. 5° 58' 1" S., long. 0'^ 1' 5" E. (81° F.).
lat. 5° 58' 5" S., long. 1° 24' 1" W. (81° F.).
lat. 5° 59' 5" S., long. 3° 24' 5" W. (80° F.).
lat. 6° 0' 7" S., long. 5° 5' 4" W. (81° F.).
lat. 6° 3' 4" S., long. 6° 27' 2" W. (85°-5 F.).
lat. 3° 58' 6" S., long. 8° 11' W. (79°-8 F.).
lat. 5° 56' 3" S., long. 9' 32' 6" W. (80°-6 F.).
lat. 5° 54' S., long. 11° 48' W (81° F.).
lat. G 0' 3" S., long. 13° 24' 9" W. (81° F.).
lat. 3° 59' S., long. 13° 28' W.
lat. 2° 42' 2" S., long. 14° 43' 4" W. (81°-5 F.).
lat. 0"^ 1' 6" S., long. 15<= 56' 5" W. (81' F.).
lat. 0° 7' 8" S., long. 14° 28' 6" W. (81°-6 F.).
lat. 0° 0' 7" N., long. 18° 4' W. (80°-8 F.).
lat. 1° 17' 6" N., long. 13° 54' 4" W. (82°-3 F.).
lat. 3° 3' 4" N., long. 1 5° 0' 9" W. (83°-l F.).
Current W. byS. true.
(At Loanda.)
ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Part I.
COPEPODA.
The material from which the Copepoda noticed in this Report were ohtained w^as
collected chiefly hy means of tow-nets worked at the surface and at various depths
(under surface) from 2 to 460 fathoms, and a few were shore gatherings.
The material was contained in 149 hottles, which represented ahout as many separate
gatherings.
Lists of species ohtained in some of the more important gatherings are appended to
these introductory remarks {vide p. 13).
Comparatively few of the species were generally distributed throughout the area
examined, or were of frequent or common occurrence in the tow-nettings.
The following were among the most common and most widely distributed species in
the collection : — Eacalanus attenuatus, Bldncalanus cormitus, TJucUna vulgaris, EiichcBta
mariua, Temora stylifera, Corycmus varius, Corycceus speciosus, and Onccea obtusa. On
the other hand, a considerable number of species, though obtained in gatherings from
localities all over the area examined, were uncommon or rare in the collections in which
they occurred — Eucalanus setiger and Pleuromma abclominale may be given as examples.
Other species, though observed in comparatively few gatherings, were yet moderately
common in those in which they did occur — Kemicalanus longicoriiis is a striking
example of this. Tliis species was observed in comparatively few gatherings, but in one
of these no fewer than 80 fairly perfect specimens were obtained ; in contrast to this, it
may be stated that scarcely half a dozen sjoecimens of Ilemicalani were observed in the
whole of the ' Challenger ' collections. Several species, as Acartia sinnicaudata, Olthona
miuuta, Amyriione Andreici, Ilyopsyiliis affiiiis, and some other Harpactids, were obtained
in gatherings from inshore and brackish-water localities, as, for example, from a shore
collection at Accra and at Sao Thome Island, and in surface-gatherings from Bananah
Creek at the mouth of the River Congo, and from Loanda Harbour. A few fish-para-
sites, including the pretty Messella, were also observed, and are described in this
Report,
Many of the species occurred more frequently in the surface tow-nettings collected
during the night than in tliose collected^during the day, while in the under-surface tow-
nettings they were of more frequent occurrence in those collected during the day than
in those collected during the night. This will be observed by referring to the classified
list of species.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
9
The following Table exhibits some points of interest respecting the general distribution
of species in surface and uuder-suri'ace, and in day and niglit, collections: —
Table I. — Description of the Tow-net Gatherings.
It will be observed from this Table that the difference between the average number of
species in each of the day and night surface tow-net gatherings is rather considerable;
while as regards the average number of species in each of the day and night under-surface
tow-net gatherings there is comparatively little difference, and the difference shoAvn is
the reverse of that observed in the surface tow-net gatherings. Further, the average
number of species in the surface-gatherings is much greater in those collected during
the night, but in the under-surface gatherings the average is rather greater in those
collected during the day ; while in the combined surface and under-suxface tow-nettings
the average is, again, in favour of the night collections.
The area in which the tow-net gatherings were made may be described approximately
as extending from lat. 7° 54' N., long. 17° 25 W., eastward to Accra on the Golb Coast,
thence southwards across the Bights of Benin and Biapra to Slo Thome Island ;
from Sag Thome Island eastwards towards the mouth of the Gaboon River ; then
southwards to the mouth of the Congo and to Bananah Creek, and thence to
LoANDA Harbour. No gatherings from mid-ocean are included in the collection : the
greatest distance from land where tow-nettings were collected was not much, if at all,
over 400 miles ; but the greater number of them were collected much nearer land than
that, and this probably explains why the ' Buccaneer ' Copepoda — which exceed in number
of species those obtained from the ' Challenger ' collections, extending over an immensely
wider area — differ so much in the entire absence of some species, and in the com
paratively greater abundance of others, when compared with the ' Challenger ' Copepoda,
and also accoixnts for the presence of many curious and interesting species not repre-
sented in that collection.
second series. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 2
10 ME, T. SCOTT ON EiSTOMOSTEACA
Summary of the 'Buccaneer' Toic-net Collections, toitli the number of Species
observed in each separate gathering.
The surface tow-nettings are kept together, the under-surface are arranged according to
the depth at which the tow-nets were let down, and the whole of the tow-net gatherings
are arranged as near as possible in the order in which they were collected. In the
Table the figures 1, 2, 3, &c. above the line represent the number of the gathering as
near as possible in the order in which it was collected. " D " indicates that the
collection was made between 6 a.m. (inclusive) and 6 p.m., " N " that the collection was
made between G p.m. (inclusive) and 6 a.m., " SD " or " SN " that the collection was
made inshore during the day or night. The figures under the line show the number of
species observed in each separate gathering. Thus : — " Surface, -yt'' indicates that
No. 3 tow-netting was a surface gathering collected between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m., and that
sixteen species of Copepoda were observed in it. " Surface, ' ! ," indicates that No. 73
was an inshore gathering collected between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., in which five species of
Copepoda were observed. " 100 fms., ^," indicates that No. 8 was a gathering from
100 fathoms collected during the day, and yielded twenty-sis species of Copepoda; and so
on as in the Table.
Table II. — Summary of Tow-net Collections.
Surface Tow-net Gatherin,a;s.
FEOM THE GULP OF GUINEA. 11
Two fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
19 N
Two and half fathoms Tow-not Gathering. ^,
88 D
■ V
23 ■
Three fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
24 D 33 N 35 D 38 N
21 ' 11 ' 6 ' 9 •
Five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
89 D
17 •
Ten fathoms Tow-uet Gatherings.
41 D 42 D 45 N 50 D 51 N 54 X 55 N 64 D 65 D 07 D
~2r' ~I5~' ^2]~' ^22"' 25 ' 20 ' 21 ' 27 ' ^^T' ^23"'
69 D 72 D 100 D 114 D
~Jd~' 36 ' 19 ' 32 •
Fifteen fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
15 N 18 D 71 N
TS'' 11 ' 39 •
Twentj' fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
47 N 52 y 53 N 56 D 66 D 08D 70 D 9(:)J) 101 D 109 D
24 ' 30 ' 29 ' 26 ' 27 ' 39 ' 23 ' ~2T ' IS ' ^22^'
115 D
28
Twent3'-five fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
1J5; 5N 61) lOJf 17 D 20 N 231) 25 D 29 D
"25"' 10' 21' 16 ' "15"' T6~' "29"' "30"' li7~'
Thirty fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
43 D 46 N 57J) 113 D
27 ' 36 ' 45~' ~li5'-
Thirty-five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
58 D
33 •
Fifty fathoms Tow-net Gatherings.
2 N 4 N 7 D UN 21 D 26 D 30 D 44 D
26"' 3r' U' 13 ' liE~' "30"' "UT" "ST"
Sixty fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
59 D
T5"-
o*
12 ME. T. iSCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Eighty-five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
116 D
14 '•
One hundred fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
27*
One hundred and thirty-five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
117 D
One hundred and sixty fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
60 D
•JO •
One hundred and eighty-five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
118 D
Two hundred and thirty-five fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
119 D
33 •
Two hundred and sixty fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
61 D
"26"-
Three hundred and sixty fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
62 D
"IT"
Four hundred and sixty fathoms Tow-net Gathering.
63 D
^8"-
The following separate Lists, representing about 16'6 per cent, of the entire number of
the ' Buccaneer ' tow-nettings, are given for the purpose of showing, among other details,
the comparative differences in the general grouping of species in gatherings collected at
the surface from others collected at various depths.
The richest hauls — that is, those containing the greatest number of species — were
uuder-surface gatherings, and were, with few exceptions, from no very extreme depths.
Several o-ood catclies were also obtained by working the tow-net at the surface during
the night (see Table II.). The gathering that yielded the greatest number of species was
No. 62 from 300 fathoms, collected during the middle of the day, on January 22nd, in
lat. 1° 55' 5'' N., long. 5° 55' 5" E. ; forty-seven species were obtained in this gathering.
The collection that appeared to contain the greatest number of individuals was No. 113,
from 30 fathoms, collected during the middle of the day, on Tebruary 5th, at Station 23.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
13
List I. — Tow-net Gatlieving No. 3, surface, collected at Station 2, January 1st, 1886,
between 0 and 8.15 p.m. The specific gravity of the water calculated at 60° F, was
1'0221, surface temperature of water 82°"2 E.
Euchaita marina {PrestandrM).
Temora stjiifera {Bana).
Candace paohydactyla, Dana.
Labidocera detruncata, var. intermedia.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Oithona Challengeri, Bradij.
Microsetella atlantica, Bradi/ cj- liobertsoti.
Mii-acia eiferata, Dana.
Clytemnestra rostrata {Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycaeus varius, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
venustus, Dana.
Oncsea oblusa {Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphirina ovalis, Dana.
List II. — This List gives the number of species obtained in Tow-net Gathering No. -i,
from 50 fathoms, collected at Station 2 (lat. T 54' N., long. 17° 25' AY.), January 1st,
between 7.20 and 8.20 p.m.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
■ gracilis, Dana.
comptus, Dana.
Eucalanus atteuuatus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis. Clans.
plumosus, Claug.
Heterocalanus serricaiuLitus, n. sp.
Pleuromma abdominalo (LuhhocJc).
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Danoe, LuhhorJc.
■ Bradyi, (Jicslirccht.
securifrons, n. sp.
cteiiopus, Giesbreclit.
tenuipes, n. sp.
Euclueta marina (Prestandrea).
hebes, Gicsbrecht.
• australis, Brady.
Euchseta barbata, Brady.
yEtidius armatus, Brady.
Clausocalanus arcuicornis (Dana).
Phyllopus bidentatus, Brady.
Candace pectinata, Brady.
■ pachydactyla, Dana.
intermedia, n. sp.
Aeartia laxa, Dana.
Oitbona Challengeri, Brady.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycffius varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
Oncaea obtusa ( Dana).
gracilis ( Dana).
Saphirina metallina, Dana.
*Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock).
List III. — Tow-net Gathering Xo. 8, 100 fathoms, collected at Station 3, January 2ud,
Specific gravity of tlie water at 100 fathoms
between 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m.
1-02608, temperature 56°-4 F.
Calanus pro))in(|uus, Brady.
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Ehincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis. Clans.
Augaptilis longicaudatus {Clans).
Calocalanus pavo (Dana).
Heterochajta spiuifrons, Claus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Scolecithrix Danse {Lnbboch).
minor, Brady.
Euch;eta marina (Pr> stand rca).
jEtidius armatus, Brady.
Temora stylifera (Dana).
Aeartia laxa, Dana.
Phaenna spinifera, Clans.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
* SajjhlrinLlla is now known to be the male form of CopfVi'rt, of which there are several species.
14
Mli. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Machairopus (?) idyoides, Brady.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycaeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
Oncaja obtusa {Dana).
Oncaea gracilis (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squDlimana, Glaus.
Saphiriiia metallina, Dana.
Sapbirinella stylifera {Lubhod').
List IV.— Tow-net Gathering No. 14-, surface, lat. 5° 58' N., long. 14° 20' W., January 5tli.
Collected in the evening after darkness set in.
Calanus valgus, Bradi/.
propinquus, Brad;/.
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Rhincalanus corniitus, Dana.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claiis.
TJndina vulgaris, Dana.
Euchirella messinensis (Chins).
Scolecitbrix Danse (Lubhocl-).
Eucheeta marina (Prestandrea).
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
Pontcllopsis villosa, Brady,
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Labidoeera detruncata, var. intermedia, n. var.
Oithona setigera, Dana.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycoeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
Oncaea obtusa, Dana.
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Sapbirina ovalis, Dana.
Saphiriuella stylifera (Lubbock).
List V.— Tow-net Gathering No. 21, 50 fathoms, Station 9 (lat. 3^ 0' 8" N., long. 7° 43' W.),
January 10th. Collected at noon. Temperature (corrected) of water at 50 fathoms
59°-59 P., sp. gr. 1-02G32.
Eucalanus setiger, Brady.
attenuatus, Dana.
spinifer, n. sp.
Ehincalanus cornutus, Dana,
Hemicalanus longicornis. Clans.
Augaptilis longicaudatus (Glaus).
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Scolecitbris Danae (Lubbock).
Bradyi, Giesbreclit.
ctenopus, Gu'sbreclit.
tenuipes, n. sp.
Eucbaeta marina (I'restandrea),
Hcssei, Brady, var. similis, n. var.
Candace pacbydactyla, Dana,
intermedia, n. sp.
Acartia laxa, Dana,
Clausocalanus arcuicornis (Dana),
Temora stylifera (Dana),
Phaenna spinifera, Clans.
Pontellina plumata (Dana),
Oithona Challengeri, Brady,
Euterpe gracilis, var. armata, n. var.
Miracia efferata, Dana,
Clytemuestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
CorycEeus varius, Dana,
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
Oncaea obtusa, Dana.
gracilis, n. sp.
mediterranea (Claus).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphiriua metallina, Dana,
Saphiriuella stylifera (LubbocJc).
PEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
15
List VI.— Tow-net Gathering No. 29,
13th. Collected hetween 8 a.m
sp. gr. 1-02606.
Calanus valgus, Bradif.
gracilis, Dana.
Paracalanus parvus (Claus).
Eucalanus setiger, Bradij.
attenuatus, Dana.
f;piinfer, n. sp.
Khiuoulauus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus mucrouatus, Clans.
Calocalanus pavo (Dana).
Heterocliaita spinifrons, Claus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Clans.
TJndiua vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Dante {Luhbocl-).
ctenopus, G-ieshrecM.
Eucha?ta marina {Prestandrea).
hebes, Giesbrecht.
.^tidius armatus, Brady.
Clausooalanus furcatus (Bradi/).
Centropages violaceus, Claws.
25 fathoms, lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3° -12' W., January
and 1 P.M. Temperature at 25 fathoms 67°"7 F.,
ilecynocera Clausi, /. C Thompson.
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
Pontellina plumata (Dana).
Miracia efFerata, Dana.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycseus varius, Dana.
spcciosus, Dana.
— • pellucidus, Dana.
venustus, Dana.
Onciea obtusa, Dana.
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphirina opaca, Lubbock.
splendens, Dana.
metallina, Dana.
Sapliirinella stylifera (Lidibock).
Clausocalanus arouicornis (Dana).
List VII.~Tow-net Gathering No. 16, 30 fathoms, lat. 3° 22' 5" N., long. 4" 11' 8" E.
January 20th. Collected about 7 p.m.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
propiuquus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Eucalanus setiger, Brady.
attenuatus, Dana.
llhincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis, Clan.t.
• mucronatus, Claus.
Pleuromma abdominale (Luhhoch).
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Undlna vulgaris, Dana.
EuchircUa messinensis (Claus).
Scolecitbrix Danae (Lidiboclc).
Euchaeta marina (Prestandrea).
^tidius armatus, Brady.
Temora stylifera (Dana).
Centropages furcatus (Dana).
Mecyuocera Clausi, I. C. Thompson.
Candace pectinata, Brady.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
• setigera, Dana.
Microsetella atlantica, Brady ■.^- Boberfson.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
CorycKus varius, Dana.
spcciosus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
Oncaja obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Saphirina ovalis, Dana.
opaliua, Dana.
opaca, LuhbocJc.
metallina, Dana.
Saphirinolla stylifera (Lubbocl-).
16
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTKACA
List VIII.— Tow-net Gathering No. 55, 10 fathoms, lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long 5° 55' 5" E.,
January 22nd. Collected during the middle of the day. Temperature (corrected)
of the water 81°-98 P., surface sp. gr. 1-02358.
Paracalanus parvus (Claus).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Euchasta marina {Prestandrea).
Clausooalamis furcafcus {Brady).
Temora stylifera (Dana).
Ceiitropages furcatus (Dana).
violaceus, Clans.
Candaoe pectinata, Brad//.
Pontellina plumata (Dana).
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
Miraoia efferata, Dana.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corj-ciEus varius, Dana.
speoiosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
Oncsea obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
8aphirina ovalis, Dana.
insqualis, Dana.
opaoa, Lubbock.
Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock).
List IX. — Tow-net Gathering No. 57, 30 fathoms. Locality, date, and time of collection
the same as List VIII. Temperature of the water 63°-98 F.
Calamis valgus, Brady.
propiiKjuus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Paracalanus parvus (Claus).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Ehincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hcmicalanus longicornis, Claus.
Calocalanus pavo (Dana).
plumulosus (Claus).
Heterochieta splnifrons, Claus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scoleeithrix Danre: (Lubbock).
minor, Brady.
Bradyi, Giesbrcchf.
ctenopus, Oksbreclit.
Euchajta marina (Prestandrea).
^tidius armatus, Bradif.
Clausocalanus furcatus (Brady).
arcuicornis (Dana).
Temora stylifera (Dana).
longicornis (^I'dller).
Mecynooera Clausi, /. C. TJiompson.
Centropagos furcatus (Dana).
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
intermedea, n. sp.
truucata, Dana.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
Microsctella atlantica, Brady Sf Robertson.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Coryeasus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
■ pellucidus, Dana,
limbatus, Brady.
venustus, Dana.
Onea?a obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Sapliirina ovalis, Dana.
metallina, Dana.
Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock).
List X. — Tow-net Gathering No. 59, 60 fathoms. Locality, date, and time of collection
the same as List VIII. Temperature of water 60°-25 P., sp. gr. 1-02029.
Eucalanus setigcr, Brady. Hoterochoeta spinifrons, Claus.
Ehincalanus cornutus, Dana. Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Pleuromma abdominale (Lubbock). Euchasta hebes, Gieshrecht.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
17
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
yEtidius armatus, Bradif.
Phaemia spiniter, Claus.
Oithona ChaUengeri, Brady.
Corycseus varius, Daim.
Coryea3us spcciosus, Dana.
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphirina metallina, Dana.
Saphirinella stylifcra (Luhhoch).
List XI. — Tow-net Gathering No. 60, 160 fathoms. Locality, date, and time of collection
the same as List VIII. Temperature about 50° F.
Paraoalanus parvus (Clans).
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Euchseta marina (Prestandrea).
Temora stylifcra {Dana).
Centropages violaceus, Claus.
Pontcllina phimata, Dana.
Labidocera dctruncata, var. intermedia.
Miracia etferata, Dana.
SetelJa gracilis, Dana.
Corycseus varius, Dana.
Corycseus speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
Onea;a obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphirina ovalis, Dana.
inaequalis, Dana.
opaoa, Lubbock.
splendens, Dana.
Saphirinella stylifcra (Lubbock).
List XII.— Tow-net Gathering No. 61, 260 fathoms,
the same as List VIII. Temperature
Calanus valgus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Rhincalauus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longieornis, Claus,
Pleuromma abdominalis (L\d)bock).
Heterochaeta spinifrons, Claus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Scolecithrix Danse (Lubbock).
Bradyi, Giesbrechi.
^tidius armatus, Bradij.
Euchseta marina (Prestandrea).
Candace pectinata, Bradi/.
Locality, date, and time of collection
of water about 46° F.
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Oithona ChaUengeri, Bradij.
Miracia eiferata, Dana.
CorycKus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
OncEea obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Saphirina serrata, Brady.
Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock).
Saphirella abyssicola, nov. gen. et sp.
List XIII. — Tow-net Gatbering No. 62, 360 fathoms. Locality, date, and time of collection
the same as List VIII. Temperature of water about 43° F.
Calanus propinquns, Brady.
Paracalanus parvus ( Clans).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Rhincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longieornis, Claus.
longicaudatus, Claus.
plumosus, Claus.
Augaptilis bectieus, Giesbrechi.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI.
Calocalanus pavo (Dana).
Pleuromma abdominale (Lubbock).
princeps, n. sp.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Dana? (Lubbock).
longieornis, n. sp.
liradyi, Giesbrechi.
18
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENT0310STRACA
Scolecithrix tenuipes, n. sp.
Amallophora dubia, nov. gen. et sp.
Euchiieta marina (Prestandrea).
harbata, Brady.
jEtidius armatus, Brady.
armiger, Gieshrecht.
Clausocalanus arcuicornia (Dana).
Phyllopus bidentatua, Brady.
Temora stylifera (Datia).
Candace tnincata, Dana.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
MormoniUa pbasma, Gieshrecht.
Phaiinna spinifera, Glaus.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Oithona Challeiigeri, Brady.
setiger, Dana.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
^gisthus longirosh-is, n. sp.
Corycseus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
■ pellucidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
obtiisus, Dana.
Onca^a obiusa (Dana).
gracilis (Dana).
Copilia mirabili.s, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Glaus.
Saphirina iutequalis, Dana.
■ ■ metallina, Dana.
Sapbirinella stylifera (Luhhock).
List XIV. — Tow-net Gathering No. 63, 400 fathoms. Locality, date, and time of
collection the same as List VIII.
Calanus propincjuus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Paracalanus parvus (Clans).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Khincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis, Glaus.
Pleuromma abdominale (Lubhock).
Heterocha^ta siiiuifrous, Glaus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claws.
Undina viilgaris, Dana.
Eucbirella mcssiucnsis (Glaus).
Amallophora dubia, nov. gen. tt sp.
magna, n. sp.
Euchfet-a marina (Preslandrea).
Eucha^ta Hcssci, var. similis, n. var.
jEtidius armiger, Oieshrecht.
Temora longicornis (Midler).
Candace varicans, Gieshrecht.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
Microsetclla atlantica, Brady df Bohertson.
Longipedia minor, T. Sf A. Scott.
Clytemnestra rostrata, Brady.
Setelia gracilis, Dana.
Coryceeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
venustus, Dana.
Oncoea obtusa (Dana).
(?) Saphirina nigromaculata, Glaus.
List XV.— Tow-net Gathering No. 08, 20 fathoms. Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 3° 34'
N., long. 0° 30' 4" E.). Collected after midday, January 23rd.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
propinquus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Khincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis, Glaus.
mucronatus, Glaus.
Augaptilis hecticus, Gieshrecht.
Eattrayi, n. sp.
Pleuromma abdominale (Luhhocl').
Heterochoeta spinifrons, Glaus.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Glaus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Dan^ (Luhhoch).
Bradyi, Gieshrecht.
ctenopus, Gieshrecht.
Euchaeta marina (Prestandrea).
■?, sp.
^tidius armatus.
Clausocalanus arcuicornis (Dana).
Temora stylifera (Dana).
Mecyuocera Clausi, /. G. Thonipson.
rKO.M THE GULF OF GUINEA.
19
Oandaee pectinata, Brady.
pachydactj'la, Dana.
truncata, Dana.
I'ontellina plumata, Dana.
Stenhelia aocraensis.
Setella gracOis, Dana.
Corjcaeus variiis, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
Cor3'caeus limbatus, Brady.
Onca;a obtusa {Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Ohms.
Saphirina ovalis, Dana.
opaca, LtMock.
nietallina. Dana.
Sapbirinella stylifera (Luhlocl-).
List XVI.— Tow-net Gathering No. 71, 15 fatlioms, lat. 0° 28' 7" N.
Collected al)out 6 p.m., January 23rd.
long. 6° 35' 2" E.
Calanns valgus, Brady.
proi)inquiis, Dana.
gracilis, Dana.
ParacalaDus parvus (Claus).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
llhincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus lougieornis, Clans.
Hctcrochasta spiuifrons, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Danse (IaMocJc).
Bradyi, GieshrecJd.
Euchaeta marina {Prestandrea).
hebes, Gieshrecht.
Clausocalanus fureatus (Brady).
Temora stylifera {Dawi).
longicornis, Midler.
Centropages \-iolaceus ( Glaus).
Candace pacbydactyla, Dana.
intermedia, n. sp.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
Pontelliua jilumata, Dana.
Uithona Challeiigeri, Brady.
Microsetella atlantica, Brady ^- Robertson.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Coryca'us varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
venustus, Dana.
Oncasa obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Saphirina iuEequalis, Dana.
opalina, Dana.
opaca, LiMock.
splendens, Dana.
Saphirinella stylifera (Luhbock).
List XVII. — Tow-net Gathering No. 82, surface.
Collected about midnight, January 28th.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
Paracalauus parvus (Claus).
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
lihincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Euchseta marina (Prestandrea).
Temora stylifera (Dana).
longicornis, Muller.
Centropages fureatus (Dana).
Candace pectinata, Brady.
iuteimedia, n. sp.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
lat. 0° 22' 8" N., long. 8' 33' 2" E.
Sp. gr. of the water 1-02237.
Oithoua Challengeri, Brady.
Microsetella atlantica, Brady ^- Moberfson.
Euterpe gracilis, var. armata, n. var.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycaeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
obtusus, Dana.
Oncoea obtusa (Dana).
Saphirina ovalis, Dana.
inajqualis, Dana.
20.
Ml{. T. SCOTT ON EJNTOMOSTEACA
List XVIII. — Tow-net Gathering No. 91, shore (low tide), Sao Thome Island. Collected
during- the day, January 31st
Laophonte pygm^a, n. sp. Machairopus idyoidos, Brady.
longipes, n. sp.
List XIX.— Tow-net Gathering No. 92, surface, lat. 0° 7' & N., long. 6° 59' 2" E. Collected
February 2nd, shortly after midday.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
Temora stylifera (Dana).
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
Oithona Challcngeri, Brady.
Microsetella atlantica, B. ijj- R.
Miraoia efferata, Dana,
Corycoeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
venustus, Dana.
obtusus, Dana.
Oucuia obtusa (Dana).
List XX. — Tow-net Gathering
Collected Febr
Calanus valgus, Brady.
Rhincalauus cornutus, Dana.
Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Seolecitbrix Bradyi, Giesbrecht.
Euchaita liebes, Gvshrecht.
Temora stylifera {Dana).
loDgicornis (Mailer).
Candace intermedia, n. sp.
Labidocera acutifroas (Dana).
Pontelliua plumata, Dana.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
Euterpe gracilis, var. armata, n. var.
No. 97, surface, lat. 0° 45' 8" S., long. 7° 37' 4" E.
uary 3rd, shortly after midnight.
Microsetella atlantica, Brady 4' Robertson.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Clyta;muestra rostrata (Brady).
Setella gracilis, Dana.
Corycoeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
pellucidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
venustus, Dana.
Onca;a obtusa (Dana).
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Saphirina iuKiqualis, Dana.
serrata, Brady.
List XXL— Tow-net Gatliering No. 113, 30 fathoms. Station 23 (lat. 4° 26' 7" S.,
11 A.M. and 3 p.m., Eebruary 5th. Tempera-
This gathering contained a greater number
species, than any other in the collection.
long. 10° r 8" E.). Collected between
ture 82°-l F., sp. gr. at noon 1-U2347.
of individual specimens, though not of
Calanus propinquus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
tonsus, Brady.
Eucalanus setigcr, Brady.
• attenuatus, Dana.
Rhiucalanus cornutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis, Claus.
mucrouatus, Claus.
Heterochaeta spinifrons, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana,
Euchirella mcssinensis (Claus).
Seolecitbrix Danas (Lubbock).
Euchseta marina (Prestandrea).
barbata, Brady.
Candace pectinata, Brady.
pacbydactyla, Dana.
intermedia, n. sp.
— ■ — truncata, Dana.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
Phaenna spinifera, Claus.
FROM THE GULF OF GUIjNEA.
21
Labidocera acutifrons (Dana).
Pontella securitcra, Bradij.
Oithona Challengeri, Brady.
Corycseus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
Oncaja obtusa (Dana).
gracilis (Dana).
Copiliii mirabilis, Da?ia.
Copilia quadrata, Dana.
Rattrayi, n. sp.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Sapbiriua ina^qualis, Dana.
scrrata, Brady.
splcndcns, Dana.
metalliua, Dana.
Sapbiriiiella stylLfcra (Lubbock).
List XXII. — Tow-net Gathering No. 119, 235 fathoms, Station 23. Date and hour of
collection the same as last.
] -02648.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
propiuquus, Brady.
gracilis, Dana.
Eucalanus atteuuatus, Dana.
spinifer, n. sp.
Rhincalanus coniutus, Dana.
Hemicalanus longicornis (Claus).
plumosus, Claiis.
Plouromma abdominale (Lubbock).
Heterochajta spinifrons, Claus.
Leuckartia fiavicornis, Claus.
Scolecithrix minor, Brady.
Eucha3ta marina (Prestandrea).
uEtidius armatus, Brady.
Mecynocera Clausi, /. C. Thompson.
Acartia lasa, Dana.
Mormonilla j)hasma, Oicsbrecht.
At 200 fathoms the temperature was 55° E., sji. gr.
Euterpe gracilis, var. armata, n. var.
Microsetella atlantiea, Brady 4 Roherison.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady).
Setclla gracilis, Dana.
.^ilgisthus longirostris, n. sp.
Oncaea obtusa (Dana).
gracilis (Dana).
Corycaeus varius, Dana.
speciosus, Dana.
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Saphirina splendens, Dana.
metallina, Dana.
Saphirinella stylifcra (Lubbock),
Artotrogus abyssioolus, n. sp.
List XXIIL— Tow-net Gathering Xo. 133, surface, lat. 6° 29' 4" S., long. 11° 24' 8" E.
Collected at 7.30 p.m., February 8th. Sp. gr. at 8 p.m. 1-02398.
Paracalanus parvus (Clai(s).
rieuromma abJominale (fyubhock).
Leuckartia flavieurnis, Claus.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Scolecithrix Dana; (Lubbock).
Temora dubia (Lubbock).
longicornis (Miiller).
Centropages brachiatus, Dana.
furcatus, Dana.
Candace pachydactyla, Dana.
intermedia, n. sp.
Pontellopsis villosa, Brady.
Pontella seourifer, Brady.
inermis, Brady.
Oithona seligera, Dana.
Microsetella atlantiea, Brady ^ Robertson.
Coryca3us varius, Dana.
■ speciosus, Dana.
obtusus, Dana.
Oncaea obtusa (Dana).
Lubbockia squillimana, Claris.
22
MK. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
List XXIV. — Tow-net Gathering No. 137, sur
Collected at 5 a.m., February 9th.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
• piopiiiquus, Brady.
Paracalauus parvus (Clans).
Eucalanus atteiiuatus, Dana.
Khincalanus cornutus, Dana.
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
Soolecithrix Danas (Lubbock).
Euehseta marina (Prestandrea).
Temora dubia (LubbocJc).
longicornis (Muller).
Candace pectinata, Brady.
Acartia lasa, Dana.
Pontellopsis villosa, Brady.
Labidocera acutifrons (Dana).
face, lat. 7° 38' S., long. 12° 3' 3" E.
Sp. gr. at 1 A.M. 102623.
Pontella securifer, Brady.
inermis, Brady.
Oithona plumifeia, Dana.
Coryeteus spociosus, Dana.
pelluoidus, Dana.
limbatus, Brady.
Oncsea obtusa (Dana).
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
Lubbockia squillimana, Claus.
Sapbirina inaequalis, Dana.
opalina, Dana.
■ splendens, Dana.
Sapbirinella stj'lifera (LubbocJc).
List XXV. — Tow-net Gatherings Nos. 141, 142, 143, 144, and 145, surface, Loanda
Harbour. Collected during the afternoon, February 13th and 15th. Surface-tem-
perature at noon on the 13th was 78°'2 F. ; at noon on the 15th the surface-temperature
of the seaward part of the Harbour, where all the tow-net gatherings, except
No. 141, w^ere collected, was 79°'2 F. Few species were observed in any of the
Loanda Harbour gatherings.
Eucalanus attenuatus, Dana.
Temora longicornis (AliiUi'r).
Ceutropages brachiatus, Dana.
furcatus, Dana.
Acartia plumosa, n. sp.
Paracartia dubia, n. g. et sp.
spiuicaudata, n. g. et sp.
Oitbona setigera, Dana.
minuta, n. sp.
Longipedia minor, T. cj- A. Scott.
Euterpe gracilis, var. armata, n. var.
Corycoous obtusus (Dana).
Hersiliodes Livingstoni, n. sp.
Lichomolgus propinquus, n. sp.
COPEPODA.
INDEX TO GENERA AND SPECIES.
age
Acartia, Dana 65
Clausi, Giishrccht 67
denticornis, Brady 66
laxa, Da7ia 65
plumosa, n. sp 66
.^gisthus, Giesbrecht 104
longirostris, u. sp 104
Page
jEtidius, Brady 70
armatus, Brady 70
armiger, Giesbrecht 71
Amallophora, nov. subgen 54
dubia, n. sp 55
magna, n. sp 55
robusta, n. sp 56
Page
Amallophora typica, n. sp 54
Amymone, Claus 94
Andrewi, n. sp 94
Artotrogus, Boecl- 128
abyssicolus, n. sp 128
Augaptilis, Giesbrecht 34
hecticus, Giesbrecht 35
¥EOM THE GULF 0¥ GUINEA.
23
Page
A ugaptilis longicaudatus ( Clatis) 34
Eattrnyi, n. sp 36
Bradya, Boeck 02
brevicornis, n. sp 02
Calanus, Leach 24
comptus, Dtnia 26
gracilis, Dana 25
propiiKjuus, Braihj 25
tonsus, Brailif 25
valgus, Brad;/ 24
Caligus, MiiUer 120
bengoensis, n. sp 130
dubius, n. sp 130
Murrayanus, n. sp 120
(?) Tbymni, Da,i,( 120
Calocalanus, Gksbrecht 37
pavo (Dana) 37
plumulosus {Claus} 30
Candace, Dana 60
intermedia, n. sp 61
pacbydactyla, Dana CO
pectinata, Brad if Gl
truncata, Dana 63
varicaus, Gieshredit 62
Centropages, Kroi/er 77
brachiatus (Dana) 77
furcatus (Dana) 77
violaceus (Ckins) 78
Clausooalanus, Gieshredit .... 72
arcuicornis (Dana) 73
furcatus (Bradif) 72
latipes, n. sp 72
Cletodes, Brady OS
linearis (Clauf) 08
Clytemnestra, Dana 106
rostrata (Brady) 106
Copilia, Dana 113
denticulata, n. sp 114
Fultoni, n. sp 114
mirabilis, Dana 113
quadrata, Dana 113
Corycieus, Dana 110
limbatus, Brady Ill
obtusus, Dana. 112
pellucidus, Dana 110
speeiosus, Dana 112
varius, Dana 110
venustus, Dana Ill
Cyclopicera, Brady 127
Page
Cjxlopicera lata, Bradi/ 127
Dactylopus, Claus 08
latipes, n. sp 00
propinquus, n. sp 90
Ectinosoma, Beecl- 02
Chrystali, n. sp 02
Eucalanus, Dana 28
attenuatus, Dana 28
setigor, Brady 30
spinifer, n. sp 20
Euchffita, Philippi 57
australis, Brady 58
barbata, Brady 58
gigas, Brady 58
hebes, Gieshredit 50
var. valida, nov. var. . . 60
Hessci, Brady, var. similis. 58
nmrin'O. (Prestandrca) .... 57
pulchra (Luhhodc) 57
EuchireUa, Gieshredit 45
messinensis (Claus) 45
Euterpe, Claus 03
gracilis, Claus, var. artnata,
n. var 03
Harpacticus, M.-Edwards .... 102
ehelifer (Midler), var 102
Hemicalanus, Chius 32
longicornis, Claus 32
mucronatus, Claus 33
plumosus, Claus 33
Hersiliodes, Canu 118
Livingstoni, n. sp 118
Hessella, Brady 131
cylindrica, Brady 131
Heterocalanus, n. gen 30
serricaudatus, n. sp 40
HeteroohKta, Claus 43
spinifrons, Claus 43
Ilyopsyllus, Brady ^ Robertson . 101
affinis, n. sp 101
Labidocera, Lidjhodc 82
acutifrons, Dana 85
acutum, Dana 85
Darwinii, Luhhodc S3
detruncata, Dana, var. . . S3
Laophonte, Philippi 96
brevicornis, n. sp 07
longipes, n. sp 06
pygmtea, n. sp 97
Page
Laophonte sorrata (Claus) .... 96
Leuckartia, Claus 44
flavicoruis, Claus 44
Lichomolgus, Thorcll 1 20
congoeusis, n. sp 120
Longipedia, Claus 91
minor, T. l}- A. Scott .... 91
Lubbockia, Claris 115
squillimana, Claus 115
Machairopus, Brady 104
idyoides, Brady 104
Mecynocera, /. C. Thompson . 80
Clausi, /. C. Thompson . . 80
Microsetella, Brady ^f- Robertson. 01
atlautiea, Brady c|- Robert-
son 91
Miraeia, Dana 102
efferata, Dana 102
minor, n. sp 102
Mormonilla, Gieshredit 64
phasma, Giesbrccht 64
Nogagus, Leadi 1 30
validus, Dana 130
Oitbona, Baird 89
Challengeri, Brady 89
minuta, n. sp 90
plumifera, Dana 89
setigera, Dana 91
Onoasa, Philippi 116
gracilis (Dana) 116
mediterranea (Claus) .... 117
obtusa (Dana) IIG
Pachysoma, Claus 119
punctatum, Claus 110
Paracalanus, Botd- 26
parvus {Clans) 26
pygmseus (Claus) 27
Paracartia, u. gen 68
dubia, n. sp G9
spinicaudata, u. sp 69
Phaenna, Claus 81
spinilera, Claws 81
Phyllopus, Brady 74
bidentatus, Brady 74
Pleuromma, Claus 41
abdomiuale (Lubbod) .... 41
gracile, Claus 42
princeps, n. sp 42
Poutclla, Dana 85
24
ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Page
Pontella inermis, Brady 85
mediterraiica (Claus) .... 86
securifera, Bnidij 86
Pontellina, Dana 88
plumata, Dana 88
Pontellojjsis, Brady 87
■villosa, Brady 87
Pontopsyllus, n. g 131
elongatus, n. sp 131
Pseudanthessius, Claris 121
propinquus, n. sp 12)
Rhincalanus, Dana 30
aculeatus, n. sp 31
cornutus, Dana 30
SaphireUa, n. gen 126
abyssicola, u. sp 126
Saphirina, /. C. Thompson .... 122
inaequalis, Dana 122
Page
Saphirina mctallina, Dana .... 125
opaca, LubhocJc 124
opalina, Dana .• ■ • • 123
ovalis, Dana 122
serrata, Brady 123
sinuicauda, Brady 125
splendens, Dana 124
Siphiriuella, Clans 126
stylifera (Luhhoch) 126
Scolecithrix, Brady 47
Bradyi, Giesbrecht 51
ctenopus, Giesbrecht 48
Dante (Lidiboek) 49
dubia, Giesbrecht 5.3
latipes, n. sp. . . .
longicornis, n. sp.
major, n. sp. ...
50
52
Page
Scolecithrix minor, Brady ... 50
securifrons, n. sp 47
tenuipes, n. sp 48
tumida, n. sp 52
Sctella, Dana 109
gracilis, Dana 109
Stenhelia, Boech 95
accraensis, n. sp 96
Temora, Baird 75
longicornis {MiUler) .... 76
stylifera {Dana) 75
Temoropia, n. gen 79
mayumbaensis, n. sp 79
Thalestris, Claas 100
forficula, Claus 100
Undina, Dana 44
vulgaris, Dana 44
Section I. GNATHOSTOMA, ThoreU.
Family CALANID^.
Genus Calanus, Leach.
1819. Calanus, Leach^ Diet. Nat. Sci. vol. xiv. Art. Entomostraca.
Calanus valgus, Brady.
1883. Calanus valgus, Brady, ' Challenger' Copepoda, p. 33, pi. iii. figs. 1-7.
Habitat. Station 2 (lat. 7° 54' N., long. 17° 25'W.),in 5 and 25 fathoms, tow-nettings,
January 1st (night collection). Lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3° 42' W., in 25 and 50 fathoms,
tow-nettings, January 13th (day collections). Banauah Creek, Mouth of the Congo,
surface tow-netting ^day collection). Lat. 7° 51' G"-8, long. 11° 11' 7" E., surface
tow-netting (night collection), &c.
This species was obtained in 55 tow-nettings, 21 of which were surface nettings and 31
under-surface nettings : 5 of the surface and 22 of the under-surface nettings were day
collections, while 19 surface and 11 under-surface nettings were night collections, as
shown in the annexed formula : —
f 5 day collections,
r 24 surface 1 19 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 55 < . -.^ , ,.^,
I 31 under-surface / ^^ day ditto.
1 11 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 5 to 260 fathoms. Calanus valgus was
taken in the open sea, where the specific gravity of the water was 1-02620, and the
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 25
temperature 82°'2 P., and at Bananali Creek, where the sp. gr. of the water was 1-00870
and the temperature 82° F. It was also captured at a depth of 260 fathoms (as recorded
above), where the temperature of the water was about 16° F. This species is thus
apparently able to exist under very varied conditions, as regards the density and tem-
perature of the water. It also appeared to be generally distributed throughout the area
examined, but was more plentiful near, and south of, the Equator. The flexed position
of the right fifth foot of the male, referred to by Dr. Brady in his Eeport on the
' Challenger ' Copepoda, was also observed in many of ' Buccaneer ' specimens.
Calanus peopinqtjus, Brady.
1883. Calanus propinquus, Brady, op. cit. p. 34, pi. ii. figs. 1-7, pi. xiv. figs. 10, 11.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms, day collection, January
22nd. Station 23, surface and 235 fathoms, day collections, February 5th.
This species, though only satisfactorily identified in tow-nettings from the localities
described, may have occurred in others. Usually I was unable to identify this Calanus
with certainty, except by carefully dissecting the specimens ; hence the probability of its
being of more frequent occurrence in the collection than the few localities given for it
would seem to indicate.
Calanus tonsus, Brady.
1883. Calanus tonsus, Brady, op. cit. p. S-i, pi. iv. figs. 8, 9.
Eahltat. In a tow-netting from Station 23, a surface gathering.
The large and tumid first abdominal segment seems to be a fairly good character
of this species.
Calanus gracilis, Dana.
1852. Calanus gracilis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1078, pi. Ixxiv. fig. 10.
1883. Calanus gracilis, Brady, op. cit. p. 35, pi. v. figs. 1-6, and pi. xlvi. fig. 1.
Habitat. Station 2, 5 fathoms, night tow-netting, January 1st. Station 3, 25 fathoms,
January 2nd (day collection). Lat. 3° 22' 5" N., long. 4° 11' 8" E., 30 fathoms, January
20th (night collection). Station 21, surface, February 3rd (day collection). Station 23,
surface and 235 fathoms (the first a day, the other a night collection).
Calanus gracilis was obtained in 19 tow-nettings — 4 of these were surface gatherings and
15 were under-surface gatherings. 2 of the surface and 12 of the under-surface tow-
nettings were day collections, while 2 of the surface and 4 of the under-surface were
night collections, as in the formula : —
2 day collections.
1.
..• -,n( ^^'^'^^"^ I 2 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 19 -^ ^-.^i ,-..
( 15 under-surface | ^^ day ditto.
l 4 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 5 to 160 fathoms. Though frequent in a
few of the gatherings in which it occurred, Calanus gracilis was not a common species,
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 4
26 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
l)ut was> nevertlieless, -widely though sparingly distributed throughout the greater part of
the area examined. The specimens obtained were mostly females, and were readily
distinguished from the other species of Calanns by the long anterior antenntie and the
peculiar terminal spine of the first swimming-feet.
? Calanus comptus, Dana. (PI. V. figs. 46-50; PI. VI. figs. 1-5.)
1853. Calanus comptus, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1050, pi. Ixxii. fig. 2a.
Hale. Length, exclusive of tail-setae, 3'3 mm. Body composed of sis segments, the
first as long as the entire length of the other five. Anterior antennae scarcely longer
than the cephalothorax, 23-jointed, and very sparingly setiferous ; the proportional
lengths of the joints are nearly as in the formula : —
36 . 6 . 6 . 7 . 8 ■ 8 . 7 ■ 8 . 11 . 12 ■ 13 . 17 . 18 . 20 . 20 ■ 21 . 22 . 22 . 18 ■ 10 . 18 . 19 . 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23'
Posterior antennae and mouth-organs nearly as in Calanus fimnarcliicus. The first
four pairs of swimming-feet closely resemble those of Cal. gracilis, Dana, the peculiar
terminal spine of the outer branches of the first pair in both species being almost
identical. The fifth pair also resemble those of that species, as figured in the ' Challenger '
Copepoda, except that the small secondary branch is 3-jointed. Abdomen short,
5-jointed, the second segment rather longer than any of the others. Caudal stylets
short.
Habitat. Lat. 6° 34' N., long. 12° 39' W,, surface collection. One or two specimens
only were obtained.
This Calamis so closely resembles Calanus gracilis in many respects that I am inclined
to consider it as simply a variety of that species.
Genus Paracalanus, Boeck (1864).
Paracalantjs parvus (Claus). (PI. I, figs. 9-14.)
18G3. Calanus parvus, Claus, Die freilebendeu Copepoden, p. 173, t. xxvi. figs. 10-14, t. xxvii. figs. 1-4.
1864. Paracalanus parvus, Boeck, Oversigt Norges Copepoder, p. 232.
Length 1"12 mm. Cephalothorax elongate-ovate, rounded in front and behind.
Anterior antennae reaching to the end of the caudal stylets, 24-jointed ; the proportional
lengths of the joints are as follow (antennae the same in both sexes) : —
35 ■ 25 ■ 12 . 12 . 10 . 10 . 12 ■ 13 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 13 . 12 . 13 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24*
Posterior antennae and mouth-organs as in Calanns. The inner branch of the first
pair of swimming-feet 2-jointed, about as long as the first two joints of the outer
branch ; the basal joint of the peduncle bears a stout plumose seta near the inner distal
angle. The basal joints of both branches of the fourth pair are small, the second and
third joints of the inner branch and tlie second joint of the outer branch are furnished
on the side with an armature of spines as in the figure (fig. 11), and the outer margin of
the last joint of the outer branch is distinctly dentate from the base to the first marginal
TEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 27
spine. All the first four pairs of swimming-feet liave the inner margins of both branches
furnished with long plumose hairs. The fifth feet in the male are 1-branched — the
right short, 3-jointed, and terminating in two short spines of unequal length ; the left
5-jointed, apparently hinged between the first and second joints ; length of the joints
subequal, the last terminating in two small spines. Fifth pair of feet in the female
1-branched, 2-jointed, the last joint much narrower than the first and terminating in
one long and one short spiniform setse.
Bahltat. Lat. 6° 34' N., long. 12° 39' W., surface, January 6th (day collection). Off
Accra, 3 fathoms, January 15th (night collection). Lat. 1" 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E.,
10, 20, 30, 360, and 160 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection). Station 18, surface
tow-netting, February 3rd (day collection). Station 21i (off the mouth of the Congo
River), surface tow-netting, February 6th (day collection). Lat. 5° 9' 8" S., long. 11°
10' 4" E., surface tow-netting, February 19th (day collection), &c.
Paracalanus parvus occurred in 19 tow-nettings, 29 of which were surface and 20
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 2^ to 460
fathoms. 11 of the surface and 16 of the under-surface tow-nettings were day col-
lections, while 18 surface and 4 under-surface were night collections, as in the
formu.la : —
r 11 day collections,
r 29 surface 1 18 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 49 < ^-.n ^ v^i.
\ 20 under-surface X ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^O"
I 4 night ditto.
This species was comparatively frequent in all the gatherings in which it was
observed.
Paracalanus pyoai^L's (Claus). (PL I. figs. 1-8.)
1863. Calanus pijffnueus, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden, p. 74.
Female. Length 7 mm. (l-36th of an inch). Body robust, composed of four
segments, the first being fully twice the entire length of the outer three ; rostrum short,
stout, prominent. Anterior antennae reaching beyond the cephalothorax, 24-jointed,
sparingly setiferous ; sette mostly small, except towards the extremity, where there are
several moderately long hairs ; the proportional lengths of the joints are as shown in
the formiila : —
30 ■ 6 ■ .5 ■ 5 ■ .5 . 5 . 5 . 5 ■ G ■ 7 . 8 . 8 ■ 8 ■ 8 ■ 8 . 7 ■ S . 11 ■ 8 ■ 12 ■ U ■ 12 . lo . 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24'
Posterior antennoe small, provided with moderately long setse; the primary branch
composed of two nearly equal joints ; secondary branch fully half the length of the other ;
7-jointed, the third, fourth, and fifth joints very short, the others longer and subequal.
Mouth-organs as in Paracalanus j^arcus. The swimming-feet are also similar to those
of that species, but differ in their armature, especially in having the second as well as
the last joints of the outer branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs serrate on the
outer margin, in the terminal spines being proportionally smaller, and in both branches
4*
28 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
of the fourth pair being more slender. The fifth pair resemble those of Faracalanus
parvus, but are proportionally stouter and have much shorter terminal spines. Abdomen
small, composed of four segments, the second and third segments very short. Caudal
stylets nearly as long as the last abdominal segment, breadth about half the length ;
apical setse four. No males were observed.
Rahitat. Lat. 3° 57' 2" N., long. 7° 42' 8" W., 2 fathoms, January 9th (night collection).
Libreville, Gaboon River, surface, January 28th (day collection). Bananah Creek,
Congo River, surface, February 7th (day collection).
Comparatively few specimens of Faracalanus pygmceus were obtained.
Genus Eucalantjs, Dana.
Eucalanus and Calarms (iu part), Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. (1852).
ElJCALANUS ATTENUATUS, Dana.
1852. Calanus attenuatus, Dana, loc. cit. p. 1080, pi. Ixxv. fig. 2.
1856. Calanus mirabilis, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. vol. iv. pi. v. figs. 1-6.
1883. Eucalanus attenuatus, Brady, op. cit. p. 38, pi. ii. figs. 8-10, pi. vi. figs. 1-8.
Habitat. Station 2, 5, 25, and 50 fathoms tow-nettings, January 1st (night collections).
Station 9, 25 and 50 fathoms tow-nettings, January 10th (day collections). Station 14,
10 fathoms tow-netting, January 21st (night collection). Lagoon Island, Sao Thome,
surface tow-netting, January 28th (night collection). Station 23, surface, 10, 20, 85, 135,
185, and 235 fathoms tow-nettings, February 5th (day collections). Bananah Creek,
Congo River, surface tow-netting, February 7th (day collection). Loanda Ilarbour
(seaward), surface, February 15th (day collection).
This was one of the more common and generally distributed sj)ecies in the ' Buccaneer '
collections. It occurred in 89 tow-nettings, 41 of these being surface and 48 under-
surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings ranged in depth from 2 to 460
fathoms. 18 of the surface and 35 of the under-surface gatherings were collected
during the day, while 23 of the surface and 13 of the under-surface were collected during
the night, as in the formula: —
18 day collections.
r 18 day collectic
-41 surface \ 23 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 89-
Us under-surface J 3-^ "^"^^ ^^^^^'O-
1 13 night ditto.
Eucalanus attenuatus was taken at the surface in the open sea, the specific gravity of
the water being 1-02543 and temperature 85°-5 F., and at 360 fathoms with the tem-
perature of the water at about 43° F. It was taken off the mouth of the Congo River,
where the specific gravity of the water was 1-01984 and the temperature 82° F. (the
colour of the water here, — lat. 6° 54' 3" S., long. 11° 33' E., — was "brownish olive-green to
amber-brown "), and at Bananah Creek, where the specific gravity was only 1'00870. It
will be observed from these records that this Eucalanus is able to live in water of very
varied character, as regards density and temperature. A species capable of existing
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 29
under such a diversity of conditions might be expected to have a wide distribution, and
such is the case witli this Eucalamis. Dana has recorded it from the Pacific and China
Seas. In the ' Challenger ' Report it is recorded from the Malayan and Australasian
Seas. Sir John Lubbock has recorded it from the Bay of Biscay * and Mr. I. C.
Thompson from Madeira and the Canary Islands f. Prof. Claus records a Calanella from
the Mediteranean, which Dr. Brady thinks is " in all probability identical with the
present species."
EUCALANUS SPINIFER, n. sp. (PI. I. figs. 15-23.)
Length 5"5 mm. Forehead triangular ; rostrum as in Eucalanus attenuatus ; postero-
lateral angles produced and spiniform ; anterior antennae 22-jointed, reaching to the
extremity of the caudal stylets, the proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as
follows : —
40 ■ 11 . 11 ■ 12 . 12 . 13 . 20 . 18 . 20 . 2-5 . 29 . 27 . 29 . 29 . 29 . 26 . 29 . 27 . 24 . 2.3 . 13 . 10
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22"
The secondary branch of the posterior antennae small, 7-jointed, the two basal and the
terminal joints longer than the others, both branches furnished with numerous plumose
hairs. The secondary branch of the mandible-palp 3-jointed, stouter and nearer the
distal end of the large basal part than that of E. attenuatus; both branches furnished with
a number of long hairs, those of the secondary branch being setiferous from the middle
to near the extremity (fig. 17). Anterior and posterior foot-jaws as in E. attenuatus.
The inner branches of first pair of swimming-feet 2-jointed, joints subequal; the
following three pairs as in Eucalanus attenuatus. Fifth pair of feet in the male
1-branched, each branch 4-jointed, the last joint terminating in a long somewhat curved
spine ; on tlie inner margin and near the base of the spine springs a stout plumose hair,
the length of which exceeds that of the terminal spine. Abdomen very short and 3-
jointed, the basal joint as long as the other two together. Caudal stylets nearly as long-
as the last two abdominal segments, each stylet furnished with five plumose hairs, the
inner one being about half the length of the other four, which are about equal.
Habitat. Station 9, 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 10th (day collection). Lat.
5"" 10' N., long. 3° 56' 2" W., inshore surface tow-netting, January 12th (night
collection). Lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3' 42' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 13th (day
collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 fathoms tow-netting, January 22nd
(day collection). Lat. 4° 26' 7" S., long. 10° 1' 8" E., 238 fathoms tow-netting, February
5th (day collection).
The tow-nettings from the localities described were the only gatherings in which this
Eucalanus was observed, but, though its distribution was limited, a considerable number
of specimens were obtained. Its chief and most apparent distinctive characters are the
spiniform lateral angles of the last thoracic segment and the form of the male fifth feet.
Eucalanus spinifer is also a larger and more robust species than Eucalanus attenuatus,
which it closely resembles.
* Trans. Entom. Soc. vol. iv. pt. 2, p. 10. t Trans. Linn. Soc.
30 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
EuCALANUS SETIGER, Brady.
1883. Eucalanus sethjer, Brady, op. cit. p. 39, pi. iii. figs. 8-15.
Sahitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Off Accra, surface and 3 fathoms tow-nettings, January 16th
(day collection). Lat. 0° 45' 8" S., long. 7° 37' 4" E., surface tow-netting, Eehruary 2nd
(night collection). Bananah Creek, Congo River, surface tow-netting, February 7th (day
collection), &c.
Eucalanus setiger was observed in 32 tow-nettings, 15 of which were surface and 17
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings were from various dej)ths,
ranging from 3 to 60 fathoms. Of the surface gatherings 10 of them were day, and 5
(including 1 close inshore) were night collections. Of the under-surface gatherings,
11 were day and 6 were night collections, as in the formula : —
f 10 day collections.
n. ,,. „r 15 surface -y 5 ^igi,t ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 32-< ^ ,, ^ ,.^
1 17 under-surface | ^^ ^^^ '^^tto.
1 6 night ditto.
By comparing this with other formula it will be observed that Eucalanus setiger
occurred in a proportionally greater number of day surface tow-nettings than do the
majority of the species recorded in this Report, the occurrence of which is frequent
enough to admit of comparison. This difference may only be due to accidental causes ;
nevertheless it seems of sufficient interest to be worth noting, as possibly indicating less
susceptibility to the influence of daylight or sunlight than those species which occur more
frequently in night than in day surface collections.
Eucalanus setiger, like Eucalanus attenuatus, seems able to exist under very varied
conditions as regards the density and temperature of the Avater : it was obtained in the
open sea at Station 2 (50 fathoms), the density of the water being about 1*02020 and
temperature (corrected) 56°-85 E. ; at Station 23 (surface), density 1'02347 and temperature
82°-l E. ; and at Bananah Creek, where the density of the water was only 1"00870. This
may readily Ije distinguished from the other Eucalani of this Report by its smaller size
and by lateral setoe on the last two thoracic segments.
Genus Rhincalanus, Dana (1852).
Rhincalanus cornuttjs, Dana.
1852. Rhincalanus cornutus, Dana, loc. cit. p. 1083, pi. Ixxvii. figs. 2a-d.
1883. Rhincalanus cornutus, Brady, op. cit. ]). 11, pi. vii. figs. 1-10.
Eahitat. Station 3, 100 fathoms tow-netting, January 2nd (day collection). Station 9,
25 and 50 fathoms tow-nettings, January 10th (day collection). Station 14, 10 and 20
fathoms, January 21st (night collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 55" E., 30, 60,
260, 360, and 460 fathoms tow-nettings, January 22nd (day collections). Station 23,
surface, and 10, 20, 85, 135, 185, and 235 fathoms tow-nettings, Eehruary 5th (day
collections), &c.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 31
This species was observed in 70 tow-nettings, 29 of these were surface and 41 under-
surface gatherings. The under-surface comprised tow-nettings from various depths from
3 to 400 fathoms. 9 of the surface and 30 of the under-surface tow-nettings were collected
during the day, while 20 surface and 11 under-surface Avere collected during the night,
as shown by the formula : —
( 9 day collections.
rr ff .J29 surface | 20 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 70 < , , .
i il under-surface / '^" '^^^ ^^i^to.
1 11 night ditto.
The superficial and bathymetrical distribution of BJdncalanus cormitus was co-extensive
with tlie area examined, except that, unlike either Eucalanus attenuatus or setiger, it was
not obtained in any gathering from Bauanah Creek or Loanda Harbour, where the specific
gravity approximates so closely to that of fresh water. I have not observed a single
specimen among the large number that have passed through my hands that could be
ascribed to Rldiicalanus gigas, Brady.
Ehincalanus actjleatus, n. sp. (PL II. figs. 11-21.)
Length about 3'25 mm. (exclusive of tail-setae, which were fully 1 mm. in leno-th).
Body ovate, attenuate towards the head. Forehead produced forward into a strongly
spiniform rostrum. The postero-lateral angles of the last thoi*acic segment are produced
backward into spine-like processes. The anterior antennae long and slender, reaching to
beyond the caudal stylets, 21-jointed ; the proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as
follows : —
170 . 42 ■ 17 ■ 18 . 14 . 14 ■ 10 . 9 . 9 . 12 ■ 13 . 45 . 54 ■ 59 . 72 . 85 . 82 . 82 . 80 . 80 . 30
1 2 3 4 5 fi 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21'
The anterior antennae are sparingly setiferous. The secondary branch of the posterior
antennae about two-thirds the length of the primary branch, 6-jointed, the first joint
fully half as long as the second, the third, fourth, and fifth small, the last as long as all
the preceding three together ; the end of the primary branch is furnished with four long-
plumose setse and a small plain one ; two plumose setas spring from the end of the last joint
of the secondary branch and one from each of the preceding four joints. Mandible
stout, the distal end with four teeth, three of which are close together and one separated
from the others by a deep and moderately wide sinus. I failed to observe a mandible-
palp. The maxilla-palp furnished with three very long sette, which are plumose from the
middle. The anterior foot-jaws resemble those of Hemicakmus more closely than those
of Hhincalanus. The posterior foot-jaw as in Hhincalanus cornutus, but differing in being
furnished with three ciliated heart-like processes, two of which are on the under margin
and near the end of the first segment and one on the upper margin of the second
segment. Both branches of the first four pairs of swdmming-feet 3-jointed, the second of
the two basal joints of the first feet is produced on the inside so as to form a stout process
to which the inner branch is attached. A stout curved spine springs from the end of the
posterior margin of the second joint of the outer branch of the second pair of swimming-
32 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
feet, wliich is fully half as long as the next joint. The end of the last joint of the
outer hranch of the first pair is furnished with a stout plumose spinous seta, while the
outer hranches of the next three pairs have each a terminal falciform spine ciliated on the
inner margin and finely serrate on the outer margin. Fifth pair of feet 2-branched,
inner branch 1-jointed, rudimentary, and bearing at its apex a long plumose seta ; the
ff outer branch 2-jointed ; an extremely long slender seta springs from the outer edge near
^ the proximal end of the second basal joint on both sides. The terminal joints of both of
the outer branches bear several small spines on the outer margin and one on the inner
margin. Abdomen short, 4-jointed ; second and third joints smaller than the first,
subequal. Caudal stylets fully as long as the last abdominal segment, and furnished with
densely plumose dark-coloured setse.
Bahitat. Lat. 6° 38' N., long. 12° 37' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 6th (day
collection). One sj)ecimen only of this curious form was obtained.
llliiihcalanus aculeatus differs somewhat from the generic characters of Rldncalanus as
described by Prof. Brady in the number of joints of the anterior antennge, the compara-
tively long terminal joint of the secondary branch of the posterior antennae, and in the
form of the mandible and maxilla, but agrees with the other characters ; I have therefore
included it in that genus.
Genus Hemicalanus, Claus, 1863.
Hemicalanus, Claus, Die freilcbenden Copepoden, 1863 (not Hemicalanus of Dana) ;
Brady, 'Challenger' Copepoda, 1883.
Hemicalanus longicornis, Claus.
1863. Hemicalanus longicornis, Claus, loo. cit. p. 179, pi. sxix. fig. 1.
1883. Hemicalanus longicornis, Brady, op. cit. p. 44, pi. ix. figs. 1-5.
Habitat. Station 2, 25 and 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 3, 100
fathoms (day collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long.
5° 55' 5" E., 30, 260, 360, and 460 fathoms (day collections). Station 23, surface, and 10,
20, 85, 135, 185, and 235 fathoms, January 5th (day collections).
Hemicalanus longicornis was obtained in 26 tow-nettings, but only one of these was
from the surface, all the others were under-surface gatherings and ranged in depth from
5 to 160 fathoms. 21 of these tow-nettings (including the surface gathering) were day
collections, while 5 were night collections, as shown in the formula : —
1 surface 1 day collection.
25 under-surface I ^0 day coUections.
l 5 night ditto.
This Hemicalanus was of frequent occurrence in some of the tow-nettings. It was very
common in a gathering from 35 fathoms, collected on the 22nd January in lat. 1° 55' 5"
N., long. 5 55' 5" E. ; in this gathering eighty-five perfect specimens, besides a number
of others more or less damaged, were obtained.
Tow-nettings 26.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 33
Hemicalaktjs PLrMOSUS, Claus. (PI. II. fig. 6 ; PI. VI. fig. G.)
1863. Hemiculanus plumosvs, Claiis, Die freilebeiidcii Cojjcpotleu, p. 178, pi. xxviii. fig. 12, pi. xxix.
figs. 1-7.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms (night coUcetion). Lat. 6° 38' N., long. 12° 37' W., 25
fathoms (day collection). Lat. 3° 55' 3" N., long. 4' 7' 3" E., 30 fathoms (day collection).
Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms (day collection). Station 23, 85 fathoms
and 235 fathoms (day collections).
This appears to bea sciirce species in the ' Buccaneer collections ; only a few specimens
have been ol)tained. Claus {Joe. cit.) gives a very full description and some very good
figures of this Hemicalanits. Hemicalamts jj^mnosua comes very near Hemicalamis
orientalis, Brady, described in the ' Report on the ' Challenger ' Copepoda.'
Hemicalanus mucronatus, Claus.
1863. Hemicalanus mucronatus, Claus, loc. cit. p. 179, pi. xxix. fig. 2.
Length (exclusive of the tail-setse) of the specimen figured 3'8 mm. (the length varies
in diiferent specimens). Body somewhat cylindrical. Head pyramidal, the apex mucro-
nate^in some specimens spiniform, the postcro-Iateral angles of last thoracic segment
rounded. Anterior antennse, reaching to beyond the caudal stylets, 25-jointed. The
proportional lengths of the joints are represented very nearly by the annexed formula : —
40 . 10 . 15 . 17 ■ 18 ■ 18 ■ 18 . IS ■ 21 . 20 . 22 . 23 . 30 . 34 . 34 . 35 . 37 . 37 . 33 . 28 . 30 . 29 . 28 ■ 27 . 18
1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 i!l 22 23 ^4 25"
Posterior antenuaj similar to those of H. 'plumoms. The mouth-organs are also similar
to those of that species, except that the anterior foot-jaws are weaker, the spines on the
second and third joints of the same foot-jaws are shorter and more slender, and the
terminal setse of both anterior and posterior foot-jaws are not spiniferous or ciliated as in
Hemicalanus flumosus. The swimming-feet are similar to those of Hemicalanus plumosus.
Abdomen 4-jointed, first segment much larger than the others. Caudal stylets short,
divergent, the terminal seta} densely p)lumose.
Habitat. (1) Station 2, 50 fathoms toAv -netting, January 1st (night collection). (2)
Lat. 3° qS' N., long. 3° 42' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 13th (day collection).
(3) Lat. 3° 22' 5" N., long. 4° 11' 8" E., 30 fathoms tow-netting, January 20th (night
collection). (4) Station 14, 10 fathoms tow-netting, January 21st (night collection).
(5) Lat, 6° 38' N., long. 12' 37' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting (day collection). (6) Lat. V
55' 5" E., 35 fathoms tow-netting, January 22nd (day collection). (7) Off Sao Thome
Island (lat. 0° 34' N., long. 6' 30' 4" E.), 20 fathoms tow-netting, January 23rd (day
collection). (8) Station 23, surface tow-netting, Eebruary 5th (day collection).
Several specimens of H. mucronatus were obtained ; the size of the specimens varied to
some extent, and the forehead was more spiniform in some specimens than in others. This
species comes very near Hemicalanus aculeatus, Brady, in general form and in the
structure of the appendages, but is much smaller than Brady's specimen. The length
of the specimen described and figured in this lleport, which was one of the largest of
SECOKD SEllIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 5
34 MK. T. SCOTT 0\ ENTOMOSTEACA
the 'Buccaneer' specimens, was, as already stated, 3"8 mm.; hut Semicalamis aculeatus,
Brady, measured 575 mm. in length — that is, fully half as long again as the ' Buccaneer '
specimen.
It is interesting to note that while six ^^ecxes of Memicalanus (including four of Claus's
Mediterranean species) have been obtained in the ' Buccaneer ' collection, only three
(including one of Claus's Mediterranean species) were observed in the collections of the
'Challenger' expedition, and further, that while Hemiealaiii were of frequent occurrence
in the ' Buccaneer ' tow-nettings, 85 perfect specimens, besides a number of others more or
less damaged, were captured in a single tow-net gathering. The three species recorded
in the ' Challenger ' Report were represented in the collection " only by about half a dozen
specimens in all." Such a remarkable difference in the distribution of the Memicalani
seems to indicate that their distribution is local, and that, with perhaps one or two
exceptions, they prefer to frequent what is comparatively inshore water to mid-ocean.
Hemic alcmus longicornis appears to be more cosmopolitan than the other species and to
have a more or less general distribution throughout tropical and subtropical seas. Yet,
though this SemiccdaiiHs has undoubtedly an extensive distribution, it is noteworthy
that none of Dana's species can be satisfactorily ascribed to it. This might have been
accounted for had it been a critical species, but the extremely long anterior antennse of
Hemicalanus longicornis at once distinguish it from all other Calmiidce.
Genus Augaptilis, Giesbrecht (1889).
Hemicalanus, Clans (in part).
Augaptilis longicaudatus (Claus). (PL I. figs. 24-26; PL II. fig. 5.)
1863. Hemicalanus longicaudatus, Claus, loc. cit. p. 179, pi. xxix. fig. 3.
1892. Au(/aptilis longicornis, Giesbrecht, Fauna unci Flora des Golfes vonNeapel (Copepodeu), p. 414,
pi. 27. fig. 31 ; pi. 28. figs. 2, 8, 19, 23, 31, 3.5, 38; pi. 39. figs. 37, 48.
Habitat. Station 3, 100 fathoms tow-netting, January 2nd (day collection). Lat. 1°
55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms tow-nettmg (day collection).
This Augaptilis occurred only in the tow-nettings from the two localities described ; it
differs from other species of Hemicalanus in the great length of the secondary branch of
the posterior antennte, in the comparatively long caudal stylets, and particularly by
the anterior and posterior foot-jaws being furnished with moderately long setae, which
possess each a double row of short filaments with round, flat, button-like tops. These
filaments (or sense-organs ?) somewhat resemble " drawing-tacks," i. e. small nails
with round flat heads, used for fixing drawing-paper upon a drawing-board. There is a
double row of these filaments on each seta, the filaments of each double row being usually
opposite each other ; there are about 147 of these filaments in the length of a millimetre.
They impart to the setae that are furnished with them a very marked and striking
appearance. Prof. Claus considers them as forming an important and distinctive specific
character, and refers to them in his description of the species in the following terms : —
"Die Hakenhorsten der oberen imd untern Maxillarfiisse tragen zwei Reihen sehr zierlich
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 35
geknopftev Seitenspitzen." This form of filament appears to be peculiar to Augtqitilis
longicaudatns. Another species {AnguptUis TluUrwji) described in this lleport possesses
similar filaments, but the button-tops, instead of being round, are broadly crescent-shaped.
Not more than about half a dozen specimens of AugaptiUs longicaudatns were obtained
in the ' Buccaneer ' collections.
AuGAPTiLis HECTicus, Giesbrecht. (PI. I. figs. 37-39, PI. II. figs. 1-4, 38-4i2.)
1892. AnnaptUif! hecticus, Ciesbreclit, op. cit. p. ill, pi. 27. fig. 30; pi. 28. figs. 5, 9, IG, 30, 33, 37;
pi. 29. fig. 18; pi. 39. fig. 45.
1892. Hemicalanus longisetosus, Scott (MS. name).
Length, exclusive of tail-setse, 2-46 mm. ; cephalothorax elongate, slender, cylindrical,
subtriangularin front, rounded behind ; anterior antennye, reaching beyond the extremity
of the abdomen, 25-joiuted ; the right antenna of the male 18-jointed. Tlie proportional
lengths of the joints are nearly as follows : —
Male. 20 . 12 . 10 . i:^ . 1 ;^. . 1 3 . 12 . 56 . 20 . 22 . IS . 17 . 19 . 22 . 35 . 29 . 18 . 18.
12 3 4 .-. li 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25.
Female. 20 .8 . 8 . 8 . S . 8 . 8 . 8 . 10 . 10 . 11 . 13 . 15 . 15 . ll . 13 . lT7]5TT2TTo7roTTO . 11 . 15 . is!
In the male antennae the eighth joint is rather longer than the imited lengths of
the preceding four joints, and there is a distinct hinge between the fourteenth and
fifteenth joints ; the fifteenth bears at the proximal end a slender hair-like appeudao-e
which extends forward beyond the extremity of the joint. A densely plumose seta
springs from the lower terminal angle of the sixteenth joint, and from the upper
angle a rather long non-plumose spinous seta ; a second densely plumose seta, similar to
that on the sixteenth, springs from the upper terminal angle of the seventeenth joint. The
second and third last joints of the female anterior antennae and the left male antenna
are likewise fm-nished with one or two (?) plumose sette similar to those of the male
eighth antenna ; the antennae of both sexes are otherwise sparingly setiferous. The
secondary branch of the posterior antennae is fully half the length of the primary branch,
6(?)-jointed, both branches with long plumose hairs ; mandible styliform, the extremity
somewhat furcate, but one of the teeth nearly obsolete ; other mouth-organs as in
Hemicalanus longlcornis. Five pairs of swimming-feet in both sexes, all of them 2-
branched, with both branches 3-jointed ; the terminal spine of the outer branch of the
fourth pair has a row of minute tubercules along its exterior margin ; the inner margin
is ciliated. The middle joint of the outer branch of the right (?) fifth foot of the male
bears a stout, slightly curved process on the upper part of the inner margin ; the last joint
bears a short terminal spine, immediately behind which, on the inner margin, is a
moderately long plumose hair ; the last joint of the outer branch of the left foot bears a
long curved terminal spine, finely serrate on its inner edge ; both the inner margins are
furnished with several long plumose hairs which extend beyond the terminal spine of
the outer branch of the left foot. Abdomen in the male 5-jointed, in the female 4-
jointed ; the length of the segments in both are subequal. Caudal stylets in the male about
as long as the last two abdominal segments, and in the female about the length of the
5 *
36 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
last segment of the abdomen. Eacli stylet is fm-nished with one extremely long seta,
wliicli is longer than the cephalothorax and abdomen together ; each seta bears a dense
mass of fine hairs, near, but not quite at, its extremity ; the extreme end appears to be
free from hairs ; there are also three short and densely plumose setse on the exterior
margin of the stylets, one near the middle and two near the extremity of each stylet.
EaUtat. (1) Lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3°42' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting January, 13th (day
collection). (2) Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms tow-netting, January
22nd (day collection, temperature of the water about 43° E.). (3) Off Sao Thome Island
(lat. 0° 34' N., long. 6" 30' 4" E.), 24 fathoms tow-netting, January 23rd (day collection).
Only two or three specimens of this interesting form were obtained. The extremely
long tail-setse, \Aath the remarkable accumulation of fine hairs near their extremity,
distinguish this Augaptilis at once from the other species described in this Report.
AuGAPTiLis Rattrayi, n. sp. (PI. II. figs. 25-37.)
Length, exclusive of tail-setse, 4'9 mm. Cephalothorax robust, seen from above
broadly ovate, measuring in breadth 2'6 mm., rounded in front, the postero-lateral
ano-les of the last thoracic segment also rounded. Thoracic segments five, the first as
lono" as all the other four together. Every part of the integument — cephalothorax,
abdomen, and appendages — is covered more or less with minute spinous hairs. Anterior
antennre short, not much longer than the first thoracic segment, 24-jointed. The pro-
portional lengths of the joints are nearly as follows : —
60 . 25 . 20 . 20 . 20 . 20 . 22 . 35 . 35 . 32 . 43 . 50 . 53 . 49 . 52 . 54 . 60 . 56 . 47 . 49 . 40 . 42 . 45 . 36
i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2r"22 23 24"
The antennae are sparingly setiferous, the setge on the second, eighteenth, and twentieth
joints being the longest. The posterior antennse have the basal part stout, the primary
and secondary branches short, the secondary branch being shorter and more slender than
the other and 7-jointed ; the last joint is rather longer than all the preceding four
too'ether, and furnished at the extremity with three long setae, which are plumose from
the middle. The end of the primary branch is also furnished with a number of hairs
similar to those of the secondary branch. The mandibles are slender and terminate in two
moderately long teeth, between which is another minvite and rudimentary one ; the
mandible-palp is stout, 2-branched, one of the branches 2-, the other 4-jointed ;
both branches bear several plumose hairs. The "rod-like process" of the maxillas
terminates in three very long plumose hairs. Two hairs, bearing each a double row of
peculiar short filaments having flat broadly crescent-shaped tops, which extend from
near the distal end to about the middle of the hairs, spring from the extremity of a
stout lateral appendage of the maxillse. Anterior foot-jaws stout, 5-jointed, the first
two with several stout spinous hairs on the anterior margin, the last three with a number
of long setae having a double row of short filaments, with flat, broadly crescent-
shaped tops, each double row not extending below the middle of the seta. The posterior
foot-jaw 6-jointed, the first two joints moderately stout and long, sparingly setiferous
on the upper margin ; the second joint has also a long non-plumose hair attached to
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 37
its upper distal angle ; tlie next three joints are short and stout, and bear four long
fllamentiferous setre similar to those of the anterior foot-jaws. The end joint is small
and rudimentary, and terminates in one short and two long non-plumose hairs. The
swimming-feet are as in Hemicalanus longicornis ; the five pairs are 2-branched and
each branch 3-jointed, all of them being more or less thickly beset with short spinous
hairs. The basal joint of the outer branches of the first pair bears on its posterior distal
angle an elongate spine, which extends to the extremity of the last joint. The exterior
distal angles of the first and second joints of the outer branches of the third and fourth
pairs bear one very stout spine, having a short spinous process on each side of it at its
base. Abdomen short, 3-jointed, the first joint much longer than the otherjtwo together.
Caudal stylets short, somewhat divergent, each with six plumose hairs, four terminal,
which are moderately long and subequal ; a smaller one on the lower outer margin,
and one very slender hair near the base of the second terminal seta, counting from the
inside.
Habitat. (1) Station 3, 100 fathoms tow-netting, January 2nd (day collection), specific
gravity of the water 1-0260S, temperature 56"-4 F. (2) Lat. G° 38' N., long. 12^ 37' W.,
25 fathoms tow-netting, January 6th (day collection), sp. g. of the water (surface) l"02i00,
temperature (surface) 83°-5 F. (3) Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 fathoms
tow-netting, January 22nd (day collection), temperature at 30 fathoms 63°"98 F. (1) Off
Sao Thome Island, lat. 0°3i'N., long. 6° 20' 4" E., 20 fathoms tow-netting, January 23rd
(day collection).
Only one adult specimen and a few others more or less immature were obtained ; the
adult specimen is from locality (3), and is the one from which the drawings were made.
The peculiar short flat-topped filaments (sense-organs ?) with which several of the
hairs of the maxilla? and foot -jaws are furnished resemble those observed and described
in Atlcjaptilis longiccmdahis, which Prof. Claus speaks of as " sehr zierlich geknopfte
Seitenspitzen," but instead of the tops being circular like a button, as in that species,
they are broadly crescent-shaped; the " bvitton-tops " are also larger than those of
Augaptilis longictmdatiis. In AngaptiUs Rattrayi there are about forty button-topped
filaments in the length of a millimetre, but in Aifgctptilis lofigicaitdatus the number of
filaments in a millimetre is about one hundred and forty-seven. The filaments in each
double row are usually opposite each other, as shown in the enlarged drawings. They
give a pecuHar and striking appearance to the setse that are provided with them.
Genus Calocalanus, Giesbrecht (1891).
Elenco dei Copepodi pelagici,— R. Corvetta ' Vettor Pisaiii.' (Atti della Reale Accademia
del Lincei, serie iv. Rendiconti, vol. v. pt. 1.)
Calocalanus pavo (Dana). (PI. VI. figs. 9, 10.)
1852. Calanus jnivo, Daua, loc. cit. p. 1061, pi. 72.
1892. Calocalanus pavo, Giesbrecht, op. cit. p. 185, pis. 1, 4, 9, 36.
38 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Length about 7 mm. Cephalotliorax rounded in front and behind. Anterior antennae
fully a half longer than the cephalothorax and abdomen together, 24-jointed, the first
joint large and bearing two plumose and a few plain seta3, the last joint long and
slender, furnished at its extremity with four plain setae of moderate length. The
second and third last joints possess longer setae than any of the other joints ; all
the joints from the eleventh to the twentieth inclusive bear each a number of
small hairs on the upper margin besides the longer setae with which all the joints are
more or less furnished. The proportional lengths of the joints are very nearly as in the
annexed formula : —
45 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 ■ 11 . 11 ■ 15 ■ 15 . 17 ■ 18 . 22 ■ 24 . 27 . 28 . 29 . 30 . 25 . 24 . 20 . 87
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24"
Secondary branch of the posterior antennse as long as the primary branch, 8-jointed ; the
third and last much larger than the other joints ; both branches setiferous. Mandibles
stout, the apex furnished with several more or less rudimentary teeth ; the mandible-palp
well developed ; secondary branch 5(?)-jointed, shorter than the primary, the basal part
furnished with three seta3 on its inner margin. Maxillae large, somewhat similar to
those of Micalanus, but the basal part dilated. Foot-jaws as in Eiicalanus, but the
terminal setae of first foot-jaws plain. The first four pairs of swimming-feet 2-branched,
outer branches 3-jointed, the inner branch of first pair 2-, of the others 3-jointed.
The outer branches of second, third, and fourth pairs only with sabre-like terminal
spines ; the second joint of the outer and the second and third joints of the inner
branches armed with transverse rows of spines. Fifth pair of feet in the male (?J 1-
branched, branches 3-jointed, the terminal joint longer than the other two together,
compressed, the extremities rounded and furnished with several long setae and two or
three transverse rows of small hairs as in the figure, Abdomen very short, 3(?)-
jointed. Caudal stylets extremely divergent, bearing four long spreading setae, two of
which are divided to near the base.
Habitat. Station 2, surface and 25 fathoms tow-nettings, January 1st (night col-
lections). Station 3, 25 fathoms, January 2nd (day collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5' 55' 5" E., 360 and 400 fathoms
tow-netting, January 22nd (day collection). Station 23, 20 fathoms, February 5th (day
collection).
This species was comparatively frequent all over the area examined. It is readily
distinguished from other Calanidce described in this Report by the remarkably divergent
caudal stylets, which are at almost right angles to the abdomen. The anterior antennae
and tail-setae appear to be, in this species, more than usually fragile ; not a single perfect
specimen was obtained in the whole collection. The tail-setae were commonly altogether
wanting or the stumps of them only remained, and the anterior antennee were, with
very few exceptions, all more or less damaged. It was only after very carefully searching
the tow-nettings that a few specimens were discovered that had the joints of the
antennae complete ; the figure, therefore, represents the anterior antennae perfect as
regards the number of joints. No specimens with perfect caudal setae were obtained.
FKOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 39
Calocalanus plumulosus (Glaus). (PI. I. %s. 35, 36; PI. VI. figs. 7, 8.)
1863. Calanus plumulosus, Claus, Die freilebenden Copciioden, p. 174, taf. xxvi. figs. 15, 16.
1892. Calocalanus plumulosus, Giesbrecht, op. cit. p. 185, pis. 3, 9, 36.
Length (female) 1-3 mm. Body elongate, first segment nearly equal to twice the
entire length of the other three ; postero-lateral angles of thorax rounded. Anterior
antennoe, reaching somewhat beyond the extremity of the abdomen, 24.-jointed; the large
basal joint bears one long plumose seta near the proximal end, the last joint is slender
and equal to the combined length of the preceding two. The proportional lengths
of the joints are nearly as shown in the formula : —
50 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 10 . 11 . 13 . 10 . 16 . 18 . IS . 18 . 19 . 18 . 21 . 21 . 21 . 21 . 20 . 15 . 36
i 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2)i 23 24'
Posterior antennae, mouth-appendages, and swimming-feet as in Calocalanus pavo.
The last joint of each foot of the fifth pair is equal to half the length of the foot, and
the third joint is nearly one and a half times the length of the preceding one ; the
broadly rounded extremity of the last joint bears a small spine near the outer ano-le a
much larger spine near the middle, and a moderately long seta near the inner ano-le •
there are also two small setae near the distal end of the inner margin ; both mar^-ins of
the joints are also more or less fringed with cilia (PI. I. fig. 35). Abdomen short, first
segment rather tumid, the second much shorter than either the first or third, breadth of
the second and third increasing towards the distal end ; the first and second have each a
fringe of small serrse concentric with, and a little anterior to, the distal margin. Stylets
about equal to the length of the second abdominal segment, slightly divergent, and
furnished with four terminal plumose setae, and one very small seta near the extremity
of the inner margin.
Calocalanus plumulosus was obtained in a tow-net gathering from 30 fathoms,
lal. r 55' 5" N., long. 6° 55' 5" E., collected January 22ud. Only a few specimens were
observed.
This species difi'ers very markedly, not only in its greater size but also in general
appearance, from Calocalanus pavo ; moreover, the anterior antennae are proportionallv
much shorter than in that species. The proportional lengths of the joints of the anterior
antennae and fifth feet also differ considerably in the two species. Another character of
the spirit specimens is the abruptly flexed abdomen, which is bent at a right angle in all
those obtained. The position of the caudal stylets in Calocalanus plumulosus is almost
normal, while those of Calocalanus pavo are extremely divergent. The long plumose
seta on the basal joint of the anterior antennae appears also to be a character of Caloca-
lanus plumulosus *.
Genus Heterocalanus, nov. gen. (Provisional name.)
Anterior antennae 22-jointed ; right antennae of the male resembling that of the
* " Dieser " (the long basal joint of the anterior antenna?) " triigt eine kraftige, zweiseitig befiederte, gelb
pigmentirte Borate." Claus, he. cit.
40 MR. T. SCOTT ON -ENTOMOSTRACA
Pontellklce. Second branch of the posterior antenutc longer than the prhiiary branch,
4-jointed. Mandibles stout, broad, furnished with papilliform teeth and elongate
tooth-like processes on the exterior angle ; mandible palp 2-branched, secondary
branch 3-jointed. Anterior foot-jaws like those- of Ithincalanns cornutus. Posterior
foot-jaws strong, 6-jointed, the two basal joints large. The first four pairs of swimming-
feet have both branches 3-jointed. Pifth pair in both sexes 1-branched, those of
the male dissimilar and adapted for grasping ; those of the female the same on both
sides, 3-jointed, the last joint produced into a large curved spiniform process. Ovisac
large.
Heterocalanus serricaudatus, n. sp. (PL II. figs. 43-48; PI. III. figs. 1-7.)
Length 1"15 mm. Body elongate, narrowly rounded in front, the postero-lateral
angles of last thoracic segment rounded, and bearing several small spines. Anterior
antennse longer than the body ; those of the female slender, 22-jointed, sparingly seti-
ferous. The proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as follows : —
11 ■ 11 . 5 ■ 7 . 6 . 10 . 5 ■ (i . 10 . 12 . 14 ■ 16 ■ 18 . 18 ■ 18 . 16 . 14 . 14 . 13 . 14 . ]2 . 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IL' 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22'
The right anterior antenna of the male also 22-jointed, distinctly hinged between the
18th and 19th joints, the upper margin of the 18th joint serrate ; the 11th and
12th joints are small, the 14th, 15th, and IGth dilated. The general form of the male
riffht antenna somewhat resembles that of the Pontelliclce. Posterior antennae have the
secondary branches longer than the primary, 4-jointed, the third joint very small, im-
parting to the branch the appearance of being much constricted in the middle ; both
branches furnished with numerous non-plumose hairs. Mandible stout, broad, bearing
several small papillose teeth, and on the exterior angle three elongate tooth-like processes
and a short plumose seta. The basal part of the mandible palp is comparatively large,
and produced laterally to form the base of the secondary branch, which is 3-jointed.
Both branches are furnished with a number of non-plumose hairs (PI. III. fig. 4). Anterior
foot-jaws like those of Rhmcalaiius cornutus, short, obscurely 3(or 4 ?)-jointed.
Posterior foot-jaws strong, 6-jointed, the two basal joints large, the other four small,
subequal ; each of the fourth, fifth, and sixth joints bear interiorly a stout, elongate,
blunt-pointed spine, that of the fifth being much larger than those of the other two
joints ; the terminal joint is also furnished with six long plumose hairs. The first four
pairs of swimming-feet are 2-branched, both branches 3-jointed. The joints of the
inner branch of the first pair subequal ; the outer branch is without dagger-Hke spines
at the distal angles of the joints. The first joint of the inner branch and the middle
joint of the outer branch of the second, third, and fourth pairs are smaller than the other
joints, and the exterior distal angles of all the joints of the outer branches bear stout
dagger-like spines, which are finely serrate on both edges ; the last joint has an additional
and similar spine arising from an excavation on the lower half of the outer margin.
The terminal spines of the outer branches are finely serrate on the outer edge, except
near the base, which is plain ; the extremity of the terminal spines is slightly curved
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 41
outwards. The terminal spines of the outer branches of the first pair are more slender
than those of the others ; all tlie four pairs are furnished Avith numerous stout plumose
seta? on the inner marorins of both branches as well as round the extremity of the inner
branches. The fifth pair in the male is 1-branchcd. The second joint of the right foot
bears interiorly a small dilated process liaving a number of small spines ; the extremity of
the last joint truncate ; an elongate curved appendage with a tumid base springs from
the inner angle, and a stout setiferous spine from the outer angle of the extremity of
the last joint. The second joint of the left foot has a long slender appendage, very
faintly serrate on the inner edge. The outer angle of the third joint and the extremity
of the fourth terminate in a long spinous process, and the inner edge of the base of the last
joint is ciliated. The fifth pair in the female is 1-branched, the right and left are
similar, and 3(or 4 ?)-jointed ; the first and second joints stout, the third short, but produced
inwards into a large curved spiniform process, finely but distinctly serrate on both
margins ; the last (?) joint nearly obsolete, terminating in one long plain spine and a second
short one, serrate on the inner edge. Abdomen (exclusive of caudal stylets) nearly half
as long as the cephalothorax, 5-jointed in the male, 4-jointed in the female ; the
second, third, and fourth segments in the male, and the first, second, and third in the
female, fringed posteriorly wdth a prominent row of saw-like teeth. Caudal stylets as
long as the last abdominal segment, narrow, somewhat divergent, bearing each four
moderately long, terminal, plumose setva, and a fifth which springs from a notch on the
outer margin ; all the seta? are articulated below the proximal half; there is also a small
hair between the two inner setse. Ova forming one large circular complanate cluster,
containing about sixteen large ova arranged in a single layer, eleven or twelve round
the circumference, the others central.
Habitat. Lat. 5° 10' N., long. 3° 56' 2" "W., surface, close inshore, January 12th (night
collection). Off Accra, three fathoms, January 16tb (night collection). Ofi' Appi,
surface tow-netting, January 18th (day collection). Libreville, Gaboon River, in two
surface tow-nettings, January 28tli (day collection). Bananah Creek, Congo River, surface
tow-netting, Eebruary 8th (night collection).
Seterocalanus serricaudafus appears to be more confined to inshore waters than many
of the species recorded in this Report, though it seems nevertheless capable of existing
under varied conditions as regards the density of the water, having been obtained in
water varying in specific gravity from 1*02511 to l'0087O.
Genus Pleuromma, Claus.
Pleuromma, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden (1863).
? Mctridia, Boeck, Oversigt af Norges Marine Copepoda, 1864.
? Metridia, Brady, Monograph, British Copepoda, vol. i. 1878.
Pleuromma abdominale, Claus.
1863. Pleuromma abdominah, Claus, loc. cit. p. 195, pi. v. figs. 1-6, 13, 14; pi. vi. figs. 1-10.
1883. Pleuromma abdominak, Brady, ' Challenger,' Copepoda, p. 46, pi. xi. figs. 1-13.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 6
42 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Sabitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Lat.
3° 55' 3" N., long. 4° 7' 13" E., 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 20th (day collection).
Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 0° 34' N., long. 6° 31' 6" E.), 20 fathoms tow-netting,
Januaiy 23rd (day collection). Station 23, 235 fathoms tow-netting, Eehruary 5th (day
collection).
Pleuromma ahdominale was obtained in 25 tow-nettings, eight of which were surface
gatherings, and seventeen under-surface, ranging in depth from 3 to 460 fathoms ; one
of the surface and seven of the under-surface gatherings were day collections, the others
were collected dm'ing the night, as shown in the formula : —
1 day collection.
r i day collection.
8 surface | 7 ^jgj^^ collections.
Tow-nettings 25 •. ^ . t^
1 17 under-surface J ^ day ditto.
I 10 night ditto.
In the adult males the abdomen was usually more or less distorted, as figured by
Prof. Brady in his Report on the ' Challenger ' Copepoda.
The form agreeing with Pleuro^nma gracile, Claus, was obtained in a few of the tow-
nettings, and the difference between it and JPlenromma ahdominale. is so marked and
constant in the ' Buccaneer ' specimens that I have considered it preferable to record
them separately.
Pleuromma geacilb, Claus. (PI. VI. figs. 11-14.)
1863. Pleuromma gracile, Claus, loc. cit. p. 197, pi. v. figs. 7-11.
1883. ? Pleuromma ahdominale, Brady (in part), op. cit. p. 46, pi. xii. figs. 1-16; pi. xsxi. figs. 13, 14.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 250 and 360 fathoms tow-nettings,
January 22nd (day collections). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface.
A form agreeing with the description and figures of Pleuromma gracile in ' Die frei-
lebenden Copepoden ' occurred in the gatherings described ; it seems to be distinct from
Pleuromma abdominals.
Pleuromma princeps, n. sp. (PI. III. figs. 8-20.)
Length (exclusive of tail-setae) 12 mm. Cephalothorax elongate, robust. Eorehead
acute ; postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment produced, shortly spiniform.
Left anterior antenna of male 25-jointed ; the right antenna is 22-jointed, hinged at the
eighteenth joint, the proportional lengths of the joints as in the annexed formula : —
Lett. 50 . 20 . 20 . 15 . 20 . 20 . 20 . 15 . 20 . 25 . 3(1 . 30 . 40 . 45 . -50 . -SO . 50 . 50 . 55 . 38 . 85 . 37 . 40 • 30 . 10.
~1~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 H 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2l 22 23 24 25.
night. 7u . 20 . 20 . 20 . 20 . 25 . 1« . 15 . 12 . 12 . 25 . 24 . 30 . 45 . 40 . 50 . 60 . 13 . 70 . 80 . 30 . 7 .
The nineteenth joint is furnished at the distal end with a tooth-like process which
extends over the base of the next joint. There are also, near the middle of the same
joint, one long and one very short spine, which extend in a forward direction along the
margin of the segment ; both antennae are sparingly setiferous. Posterior antennae as
FEOM THE GUI.F OF GUINEA. 43
in Flevrcn.ma aldcmhwle; seta? on both branches plumose. The mouth-organs also
as in P. abdominrie, but the anterior foot-jaw bears two elongate spines which spring
from a prominent basal part near its extremity. The distal processes of the maxiUte
appear to be less produced than in Pleuromma abdominale. The first pair of swimming-
feet are smaller than the following three pairs ; the posterior outer aspect of the basal
joint of the inner branch is beset with numerous fine cilia, and the outer margin of
the middle joint is fringed with fine hairs. The exterior margin of the second, and the
upper half of the third, segment of the outer branch are also fringed with fine hairs,
while the lower half of the third segment is finely serrate. The outer branch of the
second pair of swimming-feet on both sides has the first segment " deeply excavated at
the base ;" the excavation is bounded interiorly by two strong, upward-directed, curved
spines. There is no " thumb-like prominence " on the basal segment of the third pair
of feet, as in 'Pleuromma ahdomhwle. The fourth pair of feet closely resemble the
preceding pair. The last segment of the outer branch of the first pair terminates in a
long stout seta, plumose on the inner margin. The outer branch of the second, tliird,
and fourth pairs terminates in a moderately short, stout, sabre-like spine, the inner
margin fringed with cilia, the outer margin very faintly toothed. The fifth pair of feet
strongly prehensile ; one branch (the right ?) terminates in a clumsy claw-like segment.
A small spine springs from near the proximal end of the penultimate segment. Tlie
last segment of the other branch is furnished, on the inner side and near the base, with
a moderately long, stout process, and two peculiar, stalked ap^Dendages. There is also
at the base of the last segment a thin plate having a saw-like edge, and partly sur-
rounded with delicate cilia ; both branches of the fifth feet are about the same leuo-th.
Abdomen 4-jointed; joints subequal. Caudal stylets twice the len"-th of the last
abdominal segment, and each furnished with six setae, four of them on the rounded
extremity of the stylet, one on the outer margin, and a very small slender seta on the
inner margin. All the setiB are densely plumose.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms tow-netting, January 22nd
(day collection).
Only one specimen — a male — of this fine species was obtained.
Genus Heteroch^eta, Claus.
HeterochiBta, Claus, Die fi'eilebendeu Copepodeu (1863).
HETEROCHiETA SPINIFRONS, ClaUS.
1863. Heterochatd spinifrons, Claus, loc. cit. p. 182, pi. xxxii. figs. 8, 9, 14, 16.
1883. Heterochata spinifrons, Brady, Report ' Chall.' Copep. p. 49, pi. xiii. figs. 1-13.
Habitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Lat.
3° 58' N., long. 3° 42' W., 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 13th (night collection).
Station 14, 10 fathoms, January 21st (night collection). Off Sao Thome Island (lat.
0° 3i' N., long. 6° 30' 4" E.), 20 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection). Station 23,
235 fathoms, February 5th (day collection).
6*
M ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
HeterochcBta spinifrous occurred in 20 tow-nettings ; only one of these was a surface
gathering collected during the day, the other nineteen were under-surface and I'anged
in depth from 5 to 4G0 fathoms ; fifteen of these were day collections, and four night
collections, as shown in the formula : —
r 1 sm-face 1 day collection.
Tow-nettings 20 < r 15 day collections.
U9 nnder-surface | 4 ^;^„^^ ^litto.
This, though generally distributed, was a somewhat rare species in the ' Buccaneer '
collection. The dilated outer branches of the fourth pair of swimming-feet, with their
short terminal spines, and the extremely long and slender seta of the right caudal
stylet, allow of its being readily distinguished from most other species.
Genus Leuckartia, Glaus.
Leuckartia, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden (1863).
Leuckartia plavicornis, Claus.
1863. Leuckartia flavicornis, Claus, loc. cit. p. 183, pi. xxxii. figs. 1-7.
1883. Leuckartia flavicornis, Brady, op, cit. p. 50, pi. xv. figs. 1-9, 16.
Habitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Off Accra, surface
tow-netting, January 16th (night collection). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface
tow-netting, January 27 th (night collection). Station 23, 10, 20, 85, 135, 185, and 235
fathoms tow-nettings, February 5th (day collection). Bananah Creek, Congo River,
surface tow-netting, February 7th (day collection).
This Leuckartia was observed in 67 tow-uettings ; 30 of these were surface gatherings,
and 37 under-surface. The under-surface tow-nettings were from various depths, from
10 to 460 fathoms. Seven of the surface and 27 of the under-surface tow-nettings
were day collections, the others were night collections, as exhibited by the annexed
formula : —
r 7 day collections.
r30 surface I 23 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 67 < ro7 i r++
L37 under surface [ ^^ ^'^^^ d^"*^-
L 10 night ditto.
This species appears to have been widely distributed throughout the area examined
during the ' Buccaneer's ' expedition, but comparatively few specimens were observed in
the tow-nettings in which it occurred, except in those from deep water.
Genus Undina, Dana.
Undina, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Sci. (1849).
Undina vulgaris, Dana.
1852. Undina vulgaris, Dana, Crust, of U.S. Espl. Exped. p. 1092, pi. Ixxvii. fig. 8, a-d.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 45
1856. Undina longipes, Lvibbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. p. 17, pi. vi. figs. 1-5.
1883. Undina vulgaris, Brady, Report 'Cliall.' Copep. p. 53, pi. xv. figs. 11-15 ; pi. x\iii. fig. 6.
Eabitat. Station 2, surface tow-ncttings, January 1st (niglit collection). Lat. 3° 58' N.,
long. 3° 10' W., surface tow-netting, January 13tli (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N.,
long. 5° 55' 5" E., 20, 35, and 460 fathoms tow-nettings, January 22nd (day collections).
Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface tow-netting, January 27th (night collection). Station
21, surface tow-netting, February l<th (day collection). Bananah Creek, Congo River,
surface tow-netting, Februaiy 7th (day collection).
TIndina vulgaris was observed in 89 tow-nettings ; 51 of these were surface gatherings
and 38 under-surface, the depth of which ranged from 2 to 400 fathoms ; 20 of the
surface and 26 of the under-surface gatherings were collected during the day, while
31 of the surface and 12 of the under-surface gatherings were collected during the
night, as shown by the annexed formula : —
f 20 day collections,
t 31 nio-]
T H- .J^l^^^'f^^^ 1 31 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 89< .^^ , ^.^^
1 38 under-surface / 26 day ditto.
(. 12 night ditto.
This Undina was comparatively common in the ' Buccaneer ' collections, both sexes
being equally frequent. It was also one of the more common of the ' Challenger '
Copepoda. Another species (ZJwc^mw J>«rt(?i»^, Lubbock), which appears to have been
almost as common as Undina vulgaris in the ' Challenger ' collections, was entirely
absent from the ' Buccaneer ' tow-nettings, not a trace of it being observed, though
carefully sought for.
Genus Euchieella, Giesbrecht (1891).
Elenco del Copepodi pelagici, — R. Corvetta ' Vettor Pisani.' (Atti deUa Reale Accademia
dei Lincei, serie iv. Reudicoiiti, vol. v. pt. 1, p. 330.)
? EUCHIRELLA MESSINENSIS (Claus). (PI. VI. figS. 15 & 16.)
? Undina messinensis, Claus, Die freilebendeu Copepoden, p. 187, pi. 31.
Length, exclusive of tail-setae, 5 mm. Body elongate, robust. Forehead subtruncate ;
postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment rounded and furnished with a number
of hairs. Anterior antennae reaching to near the extremity of the abdomen ; the left
24-, the right 23-jointed, the proportional lengths of the joints nearly as in the annexed
formula : —
Eight antenna. 10 ■ 13 . 7 . 6 . 7 ■ 7 . 7 . 11 . 8 . 8 . 8 . 14 . 19 . 19 . 19 . 20 . IS . 20 . 18 . 13 . 13 . 13 . 14.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24.
Left antenna. 10 . 13 . 7 . 6 . 6 . 7 . 6 . 8 .6.7.7. 8 . 14 . 15 . 20 . 19 . 20 . 18 . 20 . 17 . 14 . 13 . 11 . 14,
The 3rd, 7th, 8th, 13th, 17th, and 20th joints are each furnished with a long j^lain
seta. The terminal joint bears three (or four ?) long setse, two of them plumose ; there
is also a plumose seta on the penultimate joint, and two stout short plumose hairs sjjring
from near the end of the basal joint. The posterior antennae have the secondary branch
46 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
large and stout, 6-joiuted, the first and last joints long, tlie intermediate very short.
The small intermediate joints bear each one seta, and the extremity of the last joint three
lono" plumose setse ; the primary braucli is extremely short, being almost rudimentary.
Mandible stout, with nvimerous terminal papillose teeth; the exterior angle bears a
strono- laterally-produced spine, which is serrate on the ujiper margin. The mandible
palp is of moderate size, 2-branched, each branch with several long terminal plumose
liairs. The maxUlBD are large, and bear at the extremity and on the interior margin a
]iumber of stout setiferous spines ; the external branch of the maxilla-palp very short
and broad; terminal branch stout, somewhat digitiform; both branches with numerous
plumose hairs. Foot-jaws as in Euchceta Hessei, except that near the extremity of the
anterior foot-jaw are two setiferous spines much stouter than the others, and also two
plain spinous setae on the lower extreme angle of the ultimate joint. The first four
pairs of swimming-feet are similar to those of Euchceta ; the first pair resemble those of
Euchceta Sessei, except that the inner branch has a lobe-like process near the base, and
the outer branch a long slender terminal spine, finely serrate on the outer margin ; the
outer branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs armed with a stout terminal spine,
liaving about twenty strong saw-like teeth on its outer margin. The basal joint of the
fourth pair bears a large bifurcate spiniform appendage ; the setse on both branches of
all the four pairs are densely plumose. Abdomen short, composed of four segments,
the first large, beiDg nearly as long as all the other three together. Catidal stylets short,
divaricate, each with one short spine on the outer distal angle, and foiu* moderately long
terminal plumose hairs ; another slender hair springs from near the inner distal angle of
each stylet, and is about half the length of the others.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night tow-netting). Lat. 5° 58' N.,
long. 14° 20' W., surface gathering, January 5th (night tow-netting). Lat. 3° 22' 5" N.,
long. 4° 11' 8" E., 20 and 30 fathoms tow-nettings, January 20th (night collections).
Lat. r 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms tow -netting, January 22nd (day collection).
Lat. 1° 29' N., long. 7° 33' 8" E., surface tow-netting, January 27th (night collection).
Station 23, 30 fathoms, February 5th (day collection).
Only a few specimens of this species were obtained ; they were all females, and were
readily distinguished by the large forked spiniform appendage on the basal joints of the
fourth pair of swimming-feet. As has been pointed out by Prof. Brady, TJiidina messi-
nensis, Clans, differs from Vnclina, Dana, by the absence of the first pair of foot-jaws in
the male (as described by Dr. Glaus), and by the inner branches of the first and second
swinimino'-feet being only 1-jointed (Glaus, however describes the inner branch of the
second pair as 2-jointed, but ia the ' Buccaneer ' specimens it was certainly only
1-jointed). In TJndina, Dana, on the other hand, the inner branches of all the
swimming-feet are 3-jointed. Uiidina messlnensis has the fifth pair of feet in the
male similar to those of EuchcBta pulchra, Liibbock (to which it has been doubtfully
referred), but dificrs from that and all other Euchceta} kno\\Ti to me by the very
rudimentary form of the primary branch of the posterior antennse.
FROM THE GULF OF GriNEA. 47
Genus Scolecithrix, Brady.
ScolecithrLv, Brady, Report 'Challenger' Copepoda (1883).
Scolecithrix securifrons, n. sp. (PI. IV. figs. 40-56; PL V. fig. 1.)
Length, exclusive of tail-setae, about 4 mm. Cepbalothorax robust, the anterior
segment fully two-tbirds the length of the body. Forehead with a prominent median
keel, which is continued do\Aniwards to the slightly furcate rostrum. Anterior antennse
longer than the body, 23-jointed in the female, 19-jointcd in the male. The annexed
formula shows very nearly the proportional lengths of the joints : —
Male. 10 ■ 11 . 5 ■ 6 . 6 . 7 ■ 6 . 41 . 22 . 1.3 . 13 ■ 14 . 13 . 10 . 9 . 13 . 13 . 12 . 3 '
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23.
Female. 13 . 12 . 6 . 6 . 7 . 7 . 7 . 21 . 9 . 11 . 14 . 15 . 15 . 15 . 14 . 14 . 14 . 13 . 13 . 13 . 14 . 12 3.
The long eighth joint has one or two pseudo-divisions, indicating the possible
coalescence of two, if not three, smaller joints. The secondary branch of the posterior
antennse is half as long again as the primary one, 5-jointed, the third and fourth
joints small, the last joint with three terminal setre ; several setse spring from the vicinity
of the two small joints ; the primary branch is furnished with a number of terminal
setae, which, with the others, are all more or less plumose. Mandible-palp with two
small branches set wide apart, and each with numerous plumose hairs. Maxillae and
other mouth-organs as in Scolecithrix Dance. Pirst pair of swimming-feet small, inner
branch 1-jointed, with a lobe-like appendage, terminal spine of the outer branch small.
All the joints of the second and third pairs are armed with transverse curved rows of
short stout spinules, and the terminal sabre-like spines of the outer branches have their
exterior margin strongly and coarsely toothed. The fourth pair Avants the transverse
rows of spinules, but is otherwise similar to the second and third pairs. The fifth jjaii'
in the female is very small, 1-branched, 2-jointed, and with a moderately long
slender, curved, terminal spine, the distal half serrate on the outer margin ; a small
blunt process springs from the inner distal angle of the terminal joint, close to the base
of the elongate spine ; this spine was apparently hinged to the extremity of the last
joint, for in one or two specimens it was turned upAvard at a right angle to the joint, and
in such a manner as to allow of its being ap]jlied to the base of the first abdominal
segment. The fifth feet in the male are strongly developed ; the left foot is 1-branched,
3-jointed, with a curved finger-like process at the extremity ; the right has a slender
1-jointed inner branch, curved outwards so as to be opposed to the 2-jointed clawed
terminal part of the outer branch ; the basal part to which the two branches are attached
is much dilated. Abdomen in the female short, first segment larger and much wider
jwsteriorly than the next; the posterior margiii of the abdominal segments in both sexes
fringed with hairs. Caudal stylets short, divergent, each with four long terminal
plumose setae nearly equal in length, and a small hair near the base of the inner seta.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (niglit collection). Lat. 7°33'N.,
long. 15° 18' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 2nd (night collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N.,
long. 55° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms tow-netting, January 22nd (day collection). Lat. 0° 25' 1" N.,
4S ME- T. SCOTT OX ENTOMOSTRACA
long. 6° 35' 2" E., 10 fathoms tow-netting, January 23rd (night collection). Station 23,
185 fathoms tow-netting, February 5th (clay collection).
Kot more than one, or at most two, specimens of this Scolecitlirix were obtained in
each of the tow-nettings from the localities here recorded. The prominent keeled
forehead, which gives this species such a marked character, enables it to be readily
distingiiished.
^S"
ScOLECiTHRix CTENOPUS, Giesbrecht. (PI. V. figs. 2-9.)
1892. Scolecithrix denopus, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Copepoden), p. 285,
pis. 13, 37.
Male. Length, exclusive of tail-setse, 1'83 mm. The cephalothoras elongate, rounded
in front and behind. Anterior antennae slender, reaching to the extremity of the
abdomen, the left 21-, the right 20-jointed. The proportional lengths of the joints of the
left antenna are nearly as follows : —
16. 16. 3. 3.3. 4. 4. 16. 5. 5. 6. 6. 6. 5. 6. 5. 6. 6. 6.6. 3
1 -J. a 4 5 6 7 S y lu 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21'
The sixteenth joint of the right antenna consists of two coalescent joints, but otherwise
the right and left antennse are similar ; posterior antennce and mouth-organs as in Scoleci-
tlirix DaiKe. The inner branch of the third pair of swimming-feet small, the terminal spine
of the outer branch somewhat distorted, its outer margin being furnished with irregular
but stout and prominent teeth. The fifth pair of feet has one very short 3 -jointed,
and one very long, slender, 4-jointed branch, which extends beyond the extremity of
the abdomen ; the last segment of the elongate branch is curved, furnished on one side
with a dense fringe of hairs, and terminates in two unequal spines ; the small 3-jointed
branch is about as long as the first segment of the long branch, the basal joint being
longer than the other two together. Abdomen 4-jointed ; joints subequal, fully one-
fifth the length of the cephalothorax. Caudal stylets short, not divergent, bearing at
the extremity four moderately long plumose hairs, the inner being shorter, and the next
one considerably longer than the others ; the arrangement of the tail-setse in this species
resembles Undina more than Scolecitlirix.
Mahitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
50 fathoms tow-netting, January 10th (day collection). Lat. 3° 58' N., long. 3° 42' W.,
25 fathoms tow-netting, January 13th (day collection). Lat. 3° 55' 3" N., long. 4° 7' 3" E.^
20 fathoms tow-netting, January 20th (day collection). Lat. 0° 21' 1" N., long. 7° 33' E.,
20 fathoms tow-netting, January 29th (day collection).
Scolecitlirix ctenojms was comparatively a rare species in the ' Buccaneer ' collection,
having been observed in only a few of the tow-nettings. The most marked characteristic
uf this Scolecitlirix is the extremely long branch of the fifth foot, having the last
segment curved, and with the margin densely setiferous.
SCOLEClTHrvIX TENUIPES*, n. sp. (PI. V. figs. 10-19.)
Male. Length, exclusive of tail-seta?, 1-4 mm. Anterior antennse reaching to beyond
* From the Iod"- slender fifth loot.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 49
the extremity of the abdomen, the left 21-, the right 20-jointed. The following are the
proportional lengths of the joints, nearly, of the left antenna : —
5.4.3.3.3.3.3.13.4. 4.5. 5. 5. 6. 5. 5.5. G.5. 5. 3
12 3 4 5 0 7 ^S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2l'
The sixteenth joint of the right antenna consists of two coalescent joints, but otherwise
both right and left antennae are similar. The posterior antennae, mouth-organs, and first
pair of swimmiug-feet are somewhat similar to those of Scoleclthrix DancB. The outer
branch of the third pair has a distorted terminal spine, as in Scolecithrix ctenojms. The
segments of all the first four pairs of swimming-feet are armed with curved, transverse
rows of short, stout spinules. The fifth pair of feet consists of one very long, slender
branch, and an extremely short, almost obsolete, 3-jointed one. The elongate branch
has the basal joint somewhat stout and sliort, the second long, fully twice the length of
the third; the fourth long and slender, longer than the second; the last joint is
extremely small, with a spiniform extremity. Abdomen, caudal stylets, and tail-setae as
in Scolecithrix ctenopus, which appears to be closely allied to the species now described.
The fifth pair of feet are, however, decidedly different from those of Scolecithrix ctenopus,
being much more slender and without the fringe of hairs. The terminal worm-like
sense-organs of the anterior foot-jaws are stouter than those of Scolecithrix ctenopus,
though that species is the larger of the two.
Sahitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
50 fathoms tow-netting, January 10th (day collectionj. Lat. V 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5". E.,
30 and 3G0 fathoms tow-nettings, January 22nd (day collection).
Scolecithrix temiipes was not obtained from any surface gatliering, and was of rare
occurrence in the few tow-nettings in which it was observed.
Scolecithrix Dan.e (Lubbock).
1856. Undina Dana, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. vol. iv. p. 15, pi. ix. figs. 6-9.
1883. Scolecithrix Dance, Brady, Report ' Chall.' Copep. p. 57, pi. xvii. figs. 1-12.
Habitat. Station 2, surface tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
25 fathoms tow-netting, January 10th (day collection). Station 11, 10 fathoms tow-netting,
January 19th (day collection). Stations 21 and 22, surface tow-nettings, February 4th
(day collection). Lat. 5° 55' 1" S., long. 11° 30' 7" E., surface tow-netting, February 18th
(night collection).
Scolecithrix Dance w^as observed in 57 tow-nettings, 20 of which were surface gatherings,
and tiie others undei'-surface ; 10 of the surface and 24 of the under-surface were day
collections, wdiile 10 of the surface and 13 of the under-surface gatherings were collected
during the night, as shown by the formula ; —
r 10 day collections.
f 20 surface 1 m ,,;'i + ^•^-^.
rr, ,,. >- I <- 10 night ditto.
Tow-nettings o / < °
1 37 under-surface | ^"^ '^^^ '^^^tto.
1 13 night ditto.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 7
50 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
The imder-siirface tow-nettings ranged from 5 to 260 fathoms. This species was more
or less common in nearly all the tow-nettings in which it was observed.
Scoj-ECiTHKix MINOR, Brady.
1883. Scnlecithrix mirwr, Brady, op. cit. p. 58, pi. xvi. figs. 15-16; pi. xviii. figs. 1-5.
Hahitat. Station 3, surface tow-netting, January 2nd (day collection). Lat. 3° 5.5' 3" N.,
long. 4° 11' 8" E., 50 fathoms tow-netting, January 20th (day collectiou). Station 14,
10 fathoms, January 21st (night collection). Lat. 0° 21' 1" N., long. 7° 33' E., 20 fathoms,
January 29th (day collection). Station 23, 235 fathoms, Eebruary 5th (day tow-netting).
Station 24 (off the mouth of the Congo, colour of the water brownish-olive green to
amber-brown), surface, Eebruary 6th (day collectiou).
This Scolecithrixv{di?>a. somewhat rare species in the 'Buccaneer' tow-nettings; males
especially were very scarce, and were observed only in a 30-fathoms tow-netting from
lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E. The ultimate joint of the longer branch of the male
fifth foot and the appendage of the same branch were not so long as shown in the figure
in the ' Challenger ' Beport, but otiierwise the ' Buccaneer ' specimens agreed with the
description and drawings of Sooleciflirix minor (loc. cit.). I have examined many
specimens, mature and immature, of Scoleciihrix Dance, and have certainly not found the
fifth pair of feet in any of them to agree in structure with those of Scoleciihrix minor ;
hence I feel satisfied that the two are quite distinct from each other.
SCOLECITHRIX LONGICORNIS, n. sp. (PI. V. figS. 20-28.)
Female. Length, not including tail-sette, 1-54 mm. The first body-segment is more
than twice the entire length of the other three ; the forehead is rounded. Anterior
antenme slender, reaching to the extremity of the abdomen, 23-jointed, and furnished
with a number of very small setae (with the exception of the last joints, which
bear longer setas) (fig. 21) ; the proportional lengths of the joints nearly as in the
formula : —
G. 4. 3. 3. 3. 3.. 3. 7. 2. 3. 4. 4.. 5 .6.5. 6. 0.6. 6. 6. 6. 5. 4
i 2 3 4 5 () 7 S U H) U ll' 13 14 15 IG 17 18 1!) 20 21 -I'l 23*
The anterior foot-jaws terminate in four lobes with several plumose set?e at their
extremity, while one lobe forms the base of a fascicle of slender sensory filaments ; a
single filament also springs from the end of the lowest of the four setiferous lobes.
Posterior foot-jaws small, the first two joints long, the third very short, the fourth equal
to the entire length of the last three. Other mouth-organs similar to Scolecitlirix Dance.
The first four pairs of swimming-feet similar to those of Scoleciihrix securifrons. Eifth
pair small, 3-jointed, the middle joint rather longer than either of the other two, and
bearing several small spiniform setae at its exterior distal angle ; the extremity of the
last joint is produced forward into a triangular sharji-pointed process, wiiile an elongate
spine, serrate on the outer margin, springs from the inner distal angle (fig. 27). Abdomen
short, stout, composed of four segments, the first segment large, the other three very
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 51
short. Caudal stylets short, the length and hreadth equal ; each stylet bears four long
plamose terminal seta;, and one small seta on. the inner distal angle.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 3G0 fathoms (day collection). Station 23,
135 fathoms, February 5th (day collection).
This Scolecithrix was obtained in only two tow-nettiags from comparatively deep -water.
ScoLECiTHRix Bradyi, Gicsbreclit. (PL V. figs. 29-39.)
1892. Scolecithrix Bradyi, Giesbreclit, op. cit. p. 283, pis. 4, 13, 37.
Length about 1-8 mm. In form like that of Scolecithrix Dance. Anterior antennis in
the male as long as the cephalothorax, 19-jointed; in the female 23-jointcd and about
one-fourth longer than those of the male. The proportional lengths of the joints are
nearly as in the annexed formula : —
Male. 4. 4. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 12. 3. 4. 5. 5. 5. 5. 4. 4. 5. 6. 7.
12345 B 78 ^DIO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23.
Female. 5. 5. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 7^. 3. 4. 5. 5.5.6.6.6.6.5.5.5.6.5.3."
The basal joints bear a number of setse, but the others are very spai-ingly setiferous ;
posterior antenme and mouth-organs as in Scolecithrix Bance, but the larger branch of
the mandible-palp bears a number of very long slender setie. The first four pairs of
swimming-feet are similar to those of Scolecithrix securifrons ; the terminal spines of
the outer branches are finely but somewhat ixnequally serrate on the outer margin and
ciliated on the inner. Eifth pair wanting in the female, 1-branched in the male ; basal
joints dilated ; the third joint of the (?) right foot elongate, with a short digit-like process
on the inner margin near the distal end, the last joint divided to near the base into two
subequal segments, the inner of which is curved upward so as to form a hook-like
appendage. The (?) left foot 5-jointed and longer than the other; the second joint is
the longest, being nearly as long as all the following three together, and bearing at its
inner distal angle an appendage which is fully as long as the third joint. Abdomen and
caudal stylets in both sexes as in Scolecithrix Dance.
Scolecithrix Bradyi resembles Scolecithrix Dance very nearly in its general form, but is
much smaller ; it differs in possessing extremely long hairs on the larger branch of the
mandible-palp, and especially in the form of the fifth pair of feet.
Suhitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms tow^-netting, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
50 fathoms tow-netting, January 10th (day collection). Olf Sao Thome Island (lat. 0°
34' N., long. G° 30' 4" E.), 20 fathoms tow-netting, January 23rd (day collection). Station
23, 135 fathoms tow-netting, Eebruary 5th (day collection).
Scolecithrix affiuis was obtained in thirteen of the tow-nettings, one only of which was
a surface (night) gathering, the other twelve being under-surface, the depth of which
ranged from 5 to 360 fathoms, and of which three were collected during the day and nine
during the night, as in the formula : —
f 0 day collection.
r 1 surface { -. • i . tv-v-
m i.^- TO (_ 1 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 13< ^ °
\\-2 under-surface/ 3 day collections.
1 9 night ditto.
7*
52 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
ScoLECiTHRix LATIPES, n. sp. (PI. III. figs. 21-23 ; PI. V. figs. 40-43.)
Temale. Length 8'2 mm. (l-8th of an inch). Body stout. Abdomen short, 4-jointed
Porehead with a median keel extending round the front to the bifid rostrum. Anterior
antennte rather longer than the thorax, 23jointed, sparingly setiferous (fig. 58). The
proportional lengths of the joints are as shown in the formula : —
35 . 5 . 5 . 5 . 5 . 5 ■ 11 ■ 5 . 5 . (i . 8 . 8 ■ 8 . 8 ■ 9 ■ 9 ■ 6 . 8 . 8 ■ (j . 9 . 10 . 7
T 2~irT~5^6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23'
The posterior antennae, mouth-organs, and swimming-feet are somewhat as in Scole-
cithrix I)ancp, but the anterior foot-jaws are strongly gibbous on the underside (PL V.
fig. 42). The fifth pair of feet are simple, considerably dilated, especially towards the end,
and are each furnished with three spines on the broadly-rounded apes ; the inner ^^voq,
which is longer than the others, is finely serrate on the outer margin, the others are plain
(PL III. fig. 22). Caudal stylets short, shghtly divergent, and furnished with four long,
plumose, terminal setse.
This form, of which only one or two specimens (females) were obtained, occurred in a
gathering from 85 fathoms, collected February 5th at Station 23 (lat. 4° 26' T S.,
long. 10° V 8" E.).
Scolecithrix latipes was readily distinguished from the other species of Scolecithrix by
the pecuHar form of the fifth pair of feet, which are broad and leaf-like.
Scolecithrix major, n. sp. (PL III. figs. 24-26 ; PL V. figs. 44, 45.)
Female. Length 3 mm. (l-8th of an inch). Body elongate. The anterior foot-jaws
are stout and the marginal lobes are furnished with long, spiniform, plumose, terminal
setae ; all the sensory filaments are large with the exception of two, which are smaller and
provided witli elongate acutely -pointed heads. The terminal spines of the swimming-feet,
especially those of the third and fourth pairs, are coarsely toothed on the outer margin ;
there are sixteen or seventeen large teeth along the margin. Fifth pair small, simple,
2-jointed ; the last joint is about three times the length of the other, and armed with
one moderately long terminal and one small subtermiual spine, while a long spiniform
seta springs from near the middle of the inner margin. Abdomen long, composed of four
segments, the first three nearly equal, the last much shorter. Caudal stylets short, about
as long as the last abdominal segment ; apical sette four, plumose.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms (day collection, January 22nd).
The form of the animal, the armature of the anterior foot-jaws, and the coarsely-toothed
terminal spines of the swimming-feet are characters which distinguish this from other
species of Scolecithrix. A considerable portion of the anterior antennte was wanting in
the only specimen obtained.
Scolecithrix tumida, n. sp.* (PL III. figs. 33-38.)
? Scolecithrix ubyssalis, Giesbreclit, op. cit. p. 284, pL 13. figs. 15, 40, pi. 37. fig. 7.
Female. Length 2-4 mm. Body somewhat robust ; forehead obtuse, with a small
* This is probably the Scola-ithi-iv abi/ssalis of Giesbrechfc ; but, as there appear to be some difi'erences between his
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 53
rostrum ; jiostero-lateral angles of last thoracic segment rounded. Anterior antennre
long, reaching to near the extremity of the abdomen, 21 -jointed and sparingly setiferous.
The annexed formula shows the proportional lengths of the joints : —
12 . 3 ■ 3 . 3 . ;i ■ 3 . 8 . 3 ■ 3 ■ 4 . 6 ■ 0 ■ 7 ■ 7.8.7.7.7.6.8.11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1(5 17^18~i9~2(rTl'
Anterior foot-jaws stout ; four of the marginal lobes are each armed with a long
setiferous spine and two sctce ; a number of slender sensory filaments spring from the end
of the anterior foot-jaws as in other species of Scolccithrix. The terminal spines of the
swimming-feet are finely toothed on the outer margin ; the arrangement of the marginal
teeth of the terminal spines of the third and fourth j)airs differs from those of the second,
as shown in figure 36. The fifth pair are small, somewhat dilated, and 1-jointed, armed
with one terminal spine, a stout and prominent spine on the inner margin, and a small
tooth on the outer margin (fig. 37). Abdomen short, stout, the last segment small. Caudal
stylets short, the breadth about equal to the length, and furnished with one subterminal
and three apical sette.
Eabitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms (January 22nd, day collection).
Station 23, 85, and 235 fathoms (February 5th, day collection).
Scolecithrix tumida is a rare species in the ' Buccaneer ' collections ; its robust form,
the spinous armature of the anterior foot-jaws, and the dilated fifth pair of feet are
characters that readily distinguish it from other species of Scolecithrix.
Scolecithrix dubia, Giesbrecht. (PI. III. figs. 27-32 )
1892. Scolecithrix dubia, Giesbrecht, oj). cit. p. 281, pi. 13. fig. 29 a.
1892. Scolecithrix simulans, Scott (!MS. uame).
? Male. Length 1-6 mm. Body robust; abdomen of moderate length, 3-jointed, the
middle segment rather shorter than the first or last. Anterior antennae reaching to
about the end of the second abdominal segment, sparingly setiferous, composed of twenty
joints, the eighth equal to the entire length of the preceding four, the last two elongate,
slender. The formula shows the proportional lengths of the diflerent joints : —
5. 5. 3.3. 3.3. 3. 12. 3. 5. 6. 7.7. 7.7.5 .5.4.8.0
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 S) 10 11 12 13 14 15 10 17 18 19 20'
The articulation between the sixteenth and seventeenth joints of the right antenna is
imperfect and somewhat indistinct. The posterior antennae, mouth-ap^jendages, and
first four pairs of swimming-feet nearly as in Scolecithrix Dcmce, except that the marginal
lobes, especially the one nearest the apex, of the anterior foot-jaws bear elongate curved
spines with ciliate inner margins ; the apex, as in Scolecithrix Dance, bears a number of
hair-like filaments (fig. 29). The terminal spines of the swimming-feet are finely serrate
on the outer and ciliate on the inner margins. The fifth pair are unequal; the (?) left
consists of three joints ; the basal part of the elongate middle joint is considerably swollen
and bears a (?) spiniform appendage on its inner aspect ; the inner angle at the distal end
description and figures and the description and figures given in this Eeport, I leave the ' Buccaneer ' species as
originally described.
54 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
forms a produced lobe-like process ; the last joint small, curved imvard, and bearing a
minute bent terminal spine. The (?) right foot is longer than the other and 5-jointed ;
the first joint is about twice the length of the first joint of the (?) left foot, but the first
and second joints of the (?) right are together scarcely equal to the length of the same
joints of the other foot ; an elongate appendage — ? as long as the third joint — springs from
the end of the second joint ; the third and fourth joints, which are subequal in length, are
more slender than the preceding joint, and are together nearly equal in length to the
first ; the fifth, which is scarcely so long as the fourth and appears to be connected with
it by a hinged articulation, is ciliate on the inner edge.
Habitat. Lat. 4° 26' 7" S., long. 10° 1' 8" E., in a tow-net gathering from 235 fathoms
collected between 11 a.m. and 3.30 p.m. February 6th.
This Scolecithrix somewhat resembles Amallophora in the form of the feet of the fifth
pair, but differs in the number and proportional length of the joints. It also differs from
any other Scolecithrix described in tliis Report in the proportional length of the joints of
the anterior antenna;, the form of the anterior foot-jaws, and the fifth pair of feet.
Subgenus Amallophora *.
(Subgenus of Scolecithrix, Brady.)
Anterior antennsB 20- to 23-joiuted. Mouth-organs and swimming-feet nearly as in
Scolecithrix, except that the anterior foot-jaws are furnished with one or more appendages,
each consisting of a bundle of filaments resembling a sheaf of corn in miniature.
Fifth pair of feet in the male dissimilar, 1- or 2-branched, prehensile ; in the female
siuiple, 1-branclied.
Amallophora tvpica, n. sp. (PL III. figs. 39-lG ; PI. VI. figs. 1-1.)
Length 2"7 mm. (about l-9th of an iuch). .Body elongate, moderately stout ; forehead
rounded. Anterior antennai rather longer than the body, 20-jointed, and sparingly
setiferous. The formula shows approximately the proportional lengths of the joints : —
15 . 18 . 10 . 10 . 10 ■ 10 ■ 10 . 17 . C4 . 21 . 25 . 2G . 26 . 22 . 14 . 15 . 14 . 16 . 14 . 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 y 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20*
The first seven joints bear short club-shaped appendages. Primary branch of the
posterior antenna? short, secondaiy branch moderately long, the intermediate three very
short (fig. 41). Mandible small, with a large 2-branched palp, one of the branches 2-,
the other 4-jointed (fig. 42). Anterior foot-jaws stout, short, 4-jointed, first joint
long, the second provided with an appendage bearing a large rounded cluster of curled
filaments, and somcAvhat resembling a sheaf of corn in miniature ; third and fourth joints
small and armed with a large spiniform and several small plumose setie (fig. 44). Posterior
foot-jaws slender and elongate, 6-jointed, the first, second, and fourth joints long, the
others very short and bearing a few seta;. The first four pairs of swimming-feet as in
Scolecithrix ; the terminal spines are strongly serrate on the outer edge, those of the third
* "A/i(u\Aa, a bundle or sheaf, aud ^epeu-, to carry.
FKOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 55
pair considerably narrowed at the base. The fifth pair is simple, consisting^ of one short
3-jointcd branch, which terminates in a small spine, and one very long" and slender
branch, composed of four nearly equal parts, and bearing a ciliate digitiform process and
a number of short sette at the apex. Abdomen short, tlie first segment rather narrower
than tlie next ; the last is very small. The caudal stylets are also very short and somewhat
divergent (PI. IV. fig. 4).
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5^ 55' 5'' E., in a tow-net gathering from 35 fiithoms,
collected January 22nd. Only one specimen of this curious form Avas obtained.
Amallophora magna, n. sp. (PI. IV. figs. 5-9.)
Female. Length about 4"5 mm. (2-lltlis of an inch). Body robust, attenuated towards
the front, tlic first segment equal to the entire length of the other body-segments and
abdomen; head produced into a distinct though small median keel, which passes round
over the forehead (fig. 31). The postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment are
produced ventrally into a small tooth. Anterior foot-jaws small; four of the marginal lobes
are furnished with long terminal plumose setae, while the other forms the l)asc of a long
setose spine; several small sensory filaments, some of which have rounded licads, spring
from the extremity of the foot-jaw, as shown in fig. 0. The other mouth-organs and
swimming-feet are similar to those in Scolec'dhrLv Daiicv, except that the large terminal
spines of the swimming-feet are strongly toothed on the outer margin. Tlie fifth pair
are very small, simple, 2-jointed; the second joint is nearly twice the length of the
other and provided with one terminal and two submarginal setoe ; the terminal and one
of the submarginal sette are long and slender, the other is very short (fig. 9). Abdomen
short.
Kahltat. Off Sao Thome Island, 20 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection).
One specimen only of this curious form was obtained ; it wanted a considerable portion
of the anterior antennae and part of the abdomen, but, though thus mutilated, the peculiar
structure of the anterior foot-jaws and the large, strongly-toothed, terminal spines of the
swimming-feet, together with the large size of the animal, readily distinguish this from
allied species. No males were observed.
Amallophoea dttbia, n. sp. (PI. IV. figs. 10-18.)
Mule. Length 2-5 mm. (1-lOth of an inch). In this species the first cephalothoracic
segment is nearly equal to the entire length of the other three body-segments and the
abdomen. Anterior antennse about as long as the cephalothorax ; the right antenna is
18-, the left 23-jointed ; in the right antenna, which is indistinctly geniculate at
the proximal half (fig. 11), the seventh joint is composed of five and the fifteenth, of
two coalesced joints; the first thirteen joints of the left antenna and the corresponding
joints of the right have a row of elongate setae along the upper margin, each of which
is fvu'nished with a membrane-like unilateral expansion or fringe as shown in the figure,
but the remaining portion of the antenna? is only sparingly setiferous. The annexed
formula shows the proportional lengths of the right and left antennce : —
56 MR. T. SCOTT ON EXTOMOSTRACA
The mouth-organs are as in Scolccith^'lx, except that the anterior foot-jaws are each
provided with two jieculiar appendages, consisting of a moderately stout filament bearing
an oblong conical head, which appears to be composed of dense fibre-like tissue (fig. 13).
The posterior foot-jaws are furnished at the extremity with a few hair-like papilliferous
filaments (fig. 14). The swimming-feet are as in Scolecithrix, but the first four pairs
difi"er in the form and amount of their armature (figs. 15, 16). The fifth pair has the
second joint of the left foot elongate ; the basal part of the joint is greatly dilated, and is
furnislied interiorly with a spiniform appendage which terminates in a small apical seta ;
the third and fourth joints are small and slender ; both branches of the right foot are
2-jointed and furnished with small digitiform terminal processes (fig. 17). The abdomen
is composed of four segments, the first l)eiug rather shorter than the others. Caudal
stylets short, each bearing four moderately long, plumose, terminal hairs (fig. 18).
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5' E. In two gatherings, one from 360 fathoms
and one from 160 fathoms. Collected during the middle of the day, January 22nd.
Variety similis. (PL IV. figs. ]9-23.)
This is a form which occurred along with the other in the gathering from 460 fathoms,
and which, though closely resembling it, yet diff'ers in a few points. It resembles
AmaUoj^hora dnbia, es^^ecially in the form of the fifth pair of feet, but differs considerably
in the proportional length of the joints of the anterior antenute and of the segments of
the abdomen, as will be observed by comparing the figures of the variety with those of
the species.
Amallophoka eobusta, n. sp. (PL IV. figs. 24-29.)
Female. Length 3 mm. (l-8th of an inch). The body is robust, with a rounded forehead
and a small rostrum. The anterior foot-jaws are jorovided with a number of terminal
filaments, the majority of which are comparatively short and possess ovate conical heads,
while three of them are stout and moderately long and resemble those in Scolecithrix
(fig. 25). Posterior foot-jaws as in Scolecithrix, except that the first joint in each is
furnished with a short and stout filament having an ovate pointed head like the smaller
filaments of the anterior foot-jaws. The swimming-feet are similar to those of Amallo-
fhora magna, but the terminal spines are long, and finely seri'ate on the outer edge, and
plain on the inner edge. The fifth feet are small, simple, and 2-jointed; a large setose
spine springs from the inner margin, and a small spiniform seta from the outer margin,
of the last joint ; ^\hile a plain spine, smaller than that on the inner margin, springs from
the inner part of the rounded ai^ex, as shown in. the figure (fig. 28). Abdomen comj^ara-
tively small, 4-jointed, the segments subequal. Caudal stylets about half the length
of the last abdominal segment, and furnished with four apical plumose setae.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 57
mthitat. Station 23 (Lat. 4° 26' 7" S., long. 10° 1' 8" E.), in a gathering from 85 fathoms.
Collected about midday, Eebruaiy 5th.
One or two specimens only of this species were obtained. The armature of the anterior
and posterior foot-jaws, the long and finely serrate terminal spines of the swimming-feet,
and the form and armatiu-e of the fifth pair are characters by which this may be dis-
tinguished from other allied species.
Genus Euch^ta, Philippi.
Eucliata, Philippi, Arcliiv f. Natiirgcsch. 1843; Dana, Proc. Amcr. Acad. Sci. 1849; Claus,
Die fieilebcndeu Copepodeu, 1863 ; Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. 1883.
Edch^ta maeina (Prestandrea, 1833).
1843. Euclueta Prestandrea, Philippi, Arehiv. f. Naturgesch. Taf. iv. fig. 5.
18G3. EuchcEta Prestundrece, Claus, Die freilebeudeii Copepodeu, p. 183, pi. v. fig. 12 a, pi. ix.
figs. Q, 7, 9, 12, pi. XXX. figs. 8-17.
1883. Euclueta Prestandreie, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 60, pi. xvdii. figs. 7-15, aud pi. xix.
1892. Euclueta marina, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfcs von Neapel (Copepoden), p. 262,
pis. 1, 15, 16, 37.
Habitat. Stations 2, 3, 9, 11, 14, 21, 24, aud others; also Lagoon, Sao Thome Island,
surface tow-nettings.
Euchceta, inarina was one of the commoner species observed in the collection. It
occurred in lOG tow-nettings, 47 of which were surface-gatherings and 59 uuder-surface,
ranging from 2 to 460 fathoms. 16 of the surface and 41 of the u.nder-surface tow-nettings
Avere collected during the day, and 31 of the surface and 18 of the uuder-surface during
the night, as represented in the formula : —
J 16 day collections.
... . n. r ^^ ''''"^''''^ ^ 31 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgsl06<^ . ^^ " ,.^^
1 59 under-surface 1 ^^ '^^^ '^^"O"
1 18 night ditto.
A greater number of Euchceta marina carried ova than any other species of
Calanidse in the ' Buccaneer ' collection. The clusters of ova somewhat resembled
miniature bunches of grapes.
ErcH^TA PULCHRA (Lubbock).
1856. Undina pulcliru, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. iv. p. 14, pi. iv. figs. 5-8, pi. vii. fig. 6.
1883. Euclueta pulchra, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 63, pi. xiv. figs. 6-9, pi. xx. figs. 14-19.
mihitat. Lat. 7° 33' N., long. 15° 18' W., 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 2nd (night
collection). Lat. 2° 34' 9" N., long. 5° 22' 2" E., 20 fathoms, January 21st (night col-
lection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection).
Lat. 0° 25' 1" N., long. 6° 36' 6''E., 10 fathoms, January 24th (night collection). These are
the only tow-nettings in which this Euchceta was observed, and a few specimens only were
obtained .
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 8
58 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
EucHiETA ATJSTRALis, Brady, (PI. VI. fig. 23.)
1883. Euchceta australis, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 65, pi. xxi. figs. 5-11.
A single specimen of this species (a male) was obtained in a tow-net gatliering from
50 fatlioms at Station 2 (lat. 7° 54' N., long. 17° 25' W.). Collected between 7.20 and
8.20 p.m., January 1st. I have nothing to add to the description of this apparently rare
species contained in the Report on the Copepoda of the ' Challenger ' Expedition,
The species, after being dissected, was easily recognized by the description and figures of
it in that Report.
EucH^TA GiCAS, Brady.
1883. Euchata gigas, Brady, loc. cit. p. 65, pi. xxii. figs. 1-5.
This Euchceta was obtained in a tow-net gathering from a depth of 35 fathoms in
lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E. Collected during the day, January 22nd. Two or at
most three specimens (females) were obtained.
EucH^TA BARBATA, Brady. (PI. VI. fig. 17.)
1883. Euchceta barbata, Brady, loc. cit. p. 66, pi. xxii. figs. 6-12.
This 'Eucliceta was obtained in three different tow-net gatherings, in one from 50
fathoms at Station 2, January 1st, in one from 360 fathoms in lat. 1° 55" 5' N,, long.
5° 55' 5" E., January 22 nd, and in one from 30 fathoms, at Station 23, Eebruary 4-th.
This remarkable species is readily distinguished from other EuclicetcB by the tufts of
setae on the last abdominal segment, by the first abdominal segment being greatly dilated
ventrally, and by the tufts of seta3 on the posterior angles of the last thoracic segment.
Very few specimens (females) were obtained.
ErCHiETA (?) Hessei, Brady, var. similis, nov. var. (PL VI. figs. 24 & 25.)
1883. Euchmta Hessei, Brady, loc. cit. p. 63, pi. xx. figs. 1-13, pi. xxiii. figs. 11-14.
Male. Length 2"2 mm. (l-12th of an inch). Body elongate, rounded in front; the
postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment are produced in aculeate spines, as
shown in fig. 1. Anterior antennae as long as the thorax, 21-jointed, geniculate at the
twelfth joint ; the eighth and twelfth joints are composed of two or three coalesced
joints and are indistinctly articulated ; the basal joints are furnished with leaf -like appen-
dages, and a club-shaped filament springs from the end of the last joint. The annexed
formula shows the proportional lengths of the joints : —
10. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 3. 8. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5.6. 6. 6. 9. 14. 8. 8. 8
1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 y 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21
Posterior antennae and mouth-organs similar to those of Euchceta marina, but
the anterior foot-jaws, though small, are somewhat stout, as shown in fig. 4. Swimming-
feet also as in that species, except that tlie terminal spines of the swimming-feet are
more coarsely serrate — especially those of the third and fourth pairs, the serrations of
which number about eighteen ; the secondary spines of the second pair are longer than
TEOM THE GULF OF GUITs'EA. 59
in the other swimming-feet. The fiftli pair (fig. 25) closely resemble those of Euchceta
Sessei as figured in the ' Challenger ' Copepocla. Abdomen composed of four nearly
equal segments. Caudal stylets very short, furnished with four long plumose hairs.
Hahitcd. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms (day collection, January 22nd).
This comes very near Euchceta Sessei* and is possibly a form of that species. It
differs in the following points : — It wants the prominent rostrum of Euchceta Hessei ; the
posterior margin of the last thoracic segment bears on each side a small but distinct
aculeate spine; it possesses small but stout anterior foot-jaws; the inner edge of the terminal
spines of the swimming-feet is densely cilia te. The right foot of the fifth pair has no
secondary appendage and terminates in a spiniform process ; the left foot has a very short
inner appendage, and the last joint, which is elongate, is geniculate near the middle.
No females were observed.
Etjch.^ta hebes, Giesbrecht. (PI. VI. figs. 18 & 19.)
1892. Euchceta hebes, Giesbrecht, op. cit. p. .263, pis. 15, 16, 37.
Male. Length 2"7 mm. (l-9th of an inch). Body elongate, rostrum small. Anterior
antennae not longer than the thorax, 22-jointed ; the second joint bears a number of small
club-shaped appendages ; the upper margin of the eighth joint is produced near the
distal end into a small digitiforni setiferous lobe ; the proportional lengths of the joints is
shown in the annexed formula : —
G. 5. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4. 9. 4. 4. 6. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. 9. 8. 8. 9. 8. 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21 22
Posterior antennjB robust, the primary branch considerably shorter than the secondary.
Mouth-organs as in Euchceta marina, except that the posterior foot-jaws are com-
paratively short and stout. Swimming-feet nearly as in Euchceta marina ; the
fifth pair are unequal in length ; the left is 2-branched, the outer branch 3-jointed,
the last joint being long and slender, with a bluntly rounded extremity, the inner branch
is 1-joiuted and as long as the first two joints of the outer branch ; the right foot,
which has a small rudimentary inner branch, is shorter than the other and terminates in
three processes ; one of these processes is stout, curved, and spiniform ; the second is
oblong-ovate, somewhat truncate at the apex, and bears a dense fringe of cilia on the
distal end of the inner margin ; tlie third is a strong, somewhat hook-like appendage,
serrate on the inner edge. The whole forms a complicate apparatus with which the left
foot probably interlocks. Abdomen elongate, of four nearly equal segments, the posterior
margins of which are serrate. Caudal stylets very short, nearly obsolete, and furnished
with four plumose setae — the third from the outside being considerably longer than the
others.
Mahitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms (night collection, January 1st). Station 9, 50 fathoms
(day collection, January 10th).
* This reference is to the description aud drawings of Eachnia J/csscl in the 'Challenger" Copepoda, as no Eucha;ta
agreeing -with these was obtained in the ' Buccaneer ' collections,
8*
60 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
This species is closely allied to Euchceta marina, but differs in several important
points and especially in tlie character of the fifth feet ; it also wants the prominent bifid
rostrum of that species. No females were observed.
Etjch^ta hebes, var. valida. (PI. VI. figs. 20-22.)
A form, which may be only a variety of Euchceta hebes, occurred along with that
species in a tow-net gathering from 50 fathoms at Station 2 (lat. 7° 54' N., long. 17° 25' W.).
But while resembling Euchceta hebes in general form and in the form of the fifth feet, it
differs in some of its structural details as well as by its much greater size. The following
is a description of some of its more obvious differences : —
Length (male) 5*7 mm., of which the body forms two-thirds and the abdomen one-
third. Anterior antennte reaching somewhat beyond the last thoracic segment, 22-
jointed, sparingly setiferous ; the eighth joint, which is longer than the preceding
two together, and the seventeenth, eighteenth, and last are subequal, and are the longest
joints of the antenna?. The proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the
formtda : —
12 . 12 . 5 ■ li ■ 7 . 8 . 9 ■ 19 ■ 6 ■ 8 ■ 11 ■ 10 . 13 ■ 14 ■ 15 ■ 10 . 19 ■ 19 ■ 16 ■ 16 ■ 15 ■ 19
i 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 lU 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2,1 22"
Between each of the large marginal teeth of the proximal half of the terminal spines
of the second, third, and fourth swimming-feet there is a very small tooth ; it can only
be satisfactorily distinguished by using a moderately high magnification (fig. 21). The
second joint of the (?) right foot of the fifth pair is moderately short and considerably
swollen, and bears interiorly at its distal end an appendage, the lengtli of which is rather
greater than the elongate third joint ; the fourth joint is very slender and as long as the
third, and terminates in a blunt-pointed extremity. The (?) left foot is 4-jointed, the
first joint is short, the second and third elongate ; the last, which is comparatively short,
ends in a complex trifid apparatus, somewhat similar to that of Euchceta hebes (fig. 22).
Abdomen slender, the last segment about two-thirds the length of the preceding. Stylets
short, thek breadth scarcely equal to the length ; the long seta — the third seta from the
outside — of each is at least equal in length to the abdomen.
Genus Candace, Dana.
Candacia, Dana, Amer. Journ. Sci. 1846.
Ifionyx, Kvoyer, Nat. Tidsskr. 1849.
Candace, Dana, U. S. Expl. Exped. 1853.
Candace pachtdactyla, Dana.
1852. Candace pachyihtctyla, Dana, U. S. Expl. Exped. p. 1113, pi. Ixxviii. figs. 2a-b.
1883. Candace pachydactyla, Brady, Report Cliall. Exped. p. 68, pi. xxxi. figs. 2-9.
Habitat. Station 2, 5 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Lat. 4° 21'
8'' N., long. 1° 57' W., surface tow-netting, January 14th (day collection). Station 24,
10 fathoms, January 21st (night collection). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface,
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 61
January 27tli (clay collection). Station 23, surface, 10, 20, 85, and 185 fathoms tow-
nettings, February 5th (clay collection). Lat. S" 36' 8" S., long. 12° 57' E., surface,
February 9th (clay collection).
This Ccmdace was obtained from 57 tow-nettings, 24 of which were surface and 33
under-surface gatherings ; 37 of the tow-nettings (16 surface and 21 under-surface) were
collected during the day, and 20 (8 surface and 12 under-surface) were collected during
the night, as shown in the formula : —
16 day collection.
8 nio'ht ditto.
r24s surface
Tow-nettino;s 57< .^_ . ..,,
33 under-surface / ^^ ^^ ^"*^°-
night ditto.
■■»'■
{
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged in depth from 2 to 260 fathoms. Ccmdace
pachyclactyla, as noted above, occurred in twice as many day surface as in night surface-
gatherings ; its distribution in this respect is thus more or less the reverse of that of most
of the species described in this Report.
Candace pectinata, Brady.
1878. Candace pectinata, Brady, Monog. Brit. Copep. i. p. 49, pi. viii. figs. 14, 15 ; pi. s. figs. 1-12.
1883. Candace pectinata, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 67, pi. xxx. figs. 1-13.
Habited. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 fathoms, January 22nd (day collec-
tion). Station 23, surface tow-netting, February 5th (day collection).
This Candace was of rare occurrence in the ' Buccaneer ' collections.
Candace intermedia, n. sp. (PI. IV. figs. 30-37.)
? Candace curta, Dana (1852), Crust. U. S. Espl. Expedition,
Length, exclusive of tail-seta?, 2'46 mm. In form somewhat like Candace pectinata,
Brady, but the posterior margin of the first thoracic segment is produced in the median
dorsal line so as to form a distinct hump, which is usually of a chocolate- brown colour,
while the surrounding integument is white or nearly so (fig. 56). The last thoracic
segment (figs. 62, 63) is furnished on each side with four small hairs, the posterior one
being the longest. The 16th, 17th, and 18th joints of the right male antennae are
toothed in a manner somewhat similar to that of Candace pectinata, but the teeth on the
18th joint (the joint on the distal side of the hinge) do not form a distinct beard-like
fringe as in that species. The proportional lengths of the joints, especially of the right
male antenna, differ from those of C. pectinata and are very nearly as in the annexed
formula : —
Male antenna}. 10 . 10 . 3 . 5 . 6 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 4 . 6 . 6 . 7 . 8 . (J . 10 . 10 . 10 . 6 . 5 . 6 . 8.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23.
Female antennas. 10 . 10 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 3 . 5 . 5 . .5 . 7 . 7 . 9 . S . 9 . 7 . 5 . 4 . .5 . 6.
The 17th joint in the male is usually dark-coloured. The mouth-organs and swimming-
feet, except the fifth pair, resemble those of Candace pectinata. The fifth feet in the
female are somewhat like those of Candace pachydactyla, but the terminal spines only
62 ME, T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
are dark-coloured ; the fiftli feet in the male are intermediate in form (fig. 35) between
Candace pectinata and Candace pachydactyla. The abdomen in the female has the first
segment stout and rounded — not "produced at each side into a triangular prominence,"
as in Candace pectinafa. The first segment in the male, however, is produced on
the right side similar to that species. The posterior margin of all the abdominal
segments is finely and distinctly serrate. Between the second and third setse of the
caudal stylets (counting from the outside) there is a short stout spine, which was quite
conspicuous in some of the specimens.
This species is intermediate between Candace pectinata and Candace pachydactyla,
but is readily distinguished from both by the characteristic dark-coloured dorsal hump
described above.
Habitat. Station 2, 5 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms
(day collection). Lat. 1" 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 36 fathoms, January 22nd (day
coUectionj. Station 23, surface and 10 fathoms, February 5th (day collection). Lat. 7°
5Ji' 6" S., long. 12° 14' 7" E., surface, February 9th (day collection). This species occurred
in 16 tow-nettings, 9 of which were surface and 7 under-surface gatherings ; the under-
surface tow-nettings were from 5 to 50 fathoms. The proportion of day to night
eatherings in which it was observed is shown in the annexed formula : —
f 2 day collections.
17
r 9 surface I 7 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 16 <^ r a ^ ^•>.l.
17 under-surfaceJ^' day ditto.
I 3 night ditto.
Candace intermedia, though restricted in its distribution, was nevertheless of frequent
occurrence in some of the gatherings in which it was observed.
Candace varicans, Giesbrecht. (PL IV. figs. 38, 39 ; PI. VII. figs. 7-10.)
1892. Candace varicans, Giesbrecht, Faima und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Copepoden), p. 439,
pi. 22. figs. 22, 23.
Candace tenuiremus, Scott (MS. name).
Length, exclusive of tail-setce, 2"3 mm. Anterior antennse long and slender, reaching
to the extremity of the abdomen, 21-jointed in the female, the right antenna in the male
23-jointed ; the proportional lengths of the joints as in the annexed formula: —
Male right antenna. 10 . 10 . 5 . 4 . 0 . 7 . 3 . 4 . 3 . 3 . 4 . 4 . 8 . 7 ■ 8 . 8 . 6 . 13 . 11 . 13 . 7 ■ 6 . 8.
1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1-5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24.
Female antenna . . . 12 . 10 . 4 . 4 . 0 . 8 . 4 . 3 . 4 . 4 . 4 . 7 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 12 . 7 . 5 . 7 . 10.
The 18th joint of the right male antenna (the joint on the proximal side of the hinge)
is distinctly pectinate ; the 17th joint, which is about half the length of the 18th, is finely
toothed, and the 19th has a fringe of small fine setse on the upper margin ; several of the
basal joints bear strong marginal spines, and the 20th joint is as long as the following
two joints together. The female antemiEe resemble those of Candace truncata. The
mouth-organs and first four pairs of swimming-feet resemble those of other species of
Candace. The 5th pair in the female 3-jointed, the last joint long, with three long, stout.
FKOM THE GULF OF GriNEA. 63
terminal setose spines, and a small spine on tlie exterior margin below the middle of tlie
segment ; the 2nd joint has a stout seta on the exterior distal angle. The 5tli pair in the
male are somewhat similar to those of Candace pectiuata and Candace pachydactyla; the
left foot is 4-jointed, the penultimate bcmg longer than the others, and furnished
with a fringe of hairs on the lower exterior margin and a small spine near the interior
distal angle; the outer margin of the last joint has a fi'inge of hairs on the upper half and
four spines (2 short, 1 long, and 1 intermediate) near the margin of the lower half.
There is a small tuft of hairs and a spine on the inner aspect of the same foot ; the right
foot termmates in a stout prehensile hand like Candace pect'mata. The posterior thoracic
segment has the lateral angles produced into stout prominent spines, which in the male
reach to near the end of the first abdominal segment. The abdomen in the male 5-, in
the female 3-jointed; the first segment of the female abdomen is about as long as the
other two together, stout and rounded, but not produced into angular processes as in
Candace pect'mata. It resembles Candace trimcata in this respect, but the middle
segment is much shorter than in that species. The abdomen of the female in the
' Buccaneer ' specimens is dark-coloured — almost black, but only the stylets of the
male abdomen are dark-coloured. The tail-setse are also dark-coloured and densely
plumose. This species is intermediate between Candace pachydactyla and Candace
triincata ; its chief distinctive characters seem to be the form of the anterior male
antenna and of the male and female fifth feet.
Hahltat. Lat. 1°55' 5" S., long. 5° 55' 5" E. It was obtained in two tow-nettings from
this locality, one from 35 fathoms and one from 460 fathoms. The peculiar arrange-
ment of the colour, together with its decided character, make the species, especially
the females, quite conspicuous among their confreres.
Candace truncata, Dana.
1852. Candace truncata, Daua, Crust. U. S. Exj^lor. Exped. p. 1118, pi. Ixxviii. figs. 8 a-d.
1863. 1 Candace fizA^ji/iosa, Claus, Die freilebendeu Copep. p. 191, pi. xxvii. figs. 9-16; pi. xxxiii.
fig. 5.
1883. Candace trimcata, Brady, Report ' Challenger ' Copep. p. 69, pi. xxviii. figs. 12-15 ; pi. xxix.
figs. 1-14.
Habited. Station 2, 25 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Lat. 1°
55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 20 and 30 fathoms tow-netting, January 22nd (day collections).
Off Sao Thome Island, lat. 0° 38' 6" N., long. 6° 25' 8" E., 20 fathoms tow-netting,
January 23rd (day collection). Station 23, surface tow-netting, February 5th (day
collection).
Candace truncata was a somewhat rare species in the ' Buccaneer ' collection, the
tow-nettings described above being the only ones in which it was observed. It never-
theless appears to have a wide distribution.
64) MR. T. SCOTT OX ENTOMOSTEACA
Genus Mormonilla, Giesbrecht (1891).
Corynuropis, Scott (MS. 1892).
Resembles Corynura, Brady, in general appearance but differs in the following
details : —
1st. The body becomes gradually narrower posteriorly, so that the thorax and abdomen
are not clearly defined the one from the other.
2nd. The secondary branch of the posterior antennae is multiarticulate.
3rd. The maxillae are provided with a well-developed bilobed palp.
4th. The anterior foot-jaws are large and resemble those of Hemicalanus longicornis,
Claus.
5th. The posterior foot-jaws, which are fui'nished with a number of marginal setse, are
2-jointed, the apical joint being comparatively short (fig. 17). They resemble neither
Acartia nor Corynura.
6th. The outer branches of the first four pairs of swimming-feet are 2-, and the inner
branches 1-jointed, except the first and second pairs, which appear to have the inner
branches very indistinctly 2-joiuted.
7th. In the female the fifth pair of feet is absent or obsolete. Male unknown.
These differences, especially the 3rd, 5th, and 7th, are too important to allow of the
' Buccaneer ' specimens being ascribed to Corynura, even though the general resem-
blance is very striking.
MoBMONiLLA PHASMA, Giesbrecht. (PI. VII. figs. 11-21.)
1892. Mormonilla phasma, Giesbrecht, Fauna uiid Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Copepoden), p. 536,
pi. 43. figs. 28-32, 3-1-41.
1892. Corynuropis tenuicaudatus, Scott (MS. name).
Female. Length 1-7 mm. Body elongate-pyriform, composed of five segments, the first
equal to the combined length of the other body-segments and abdomen; forehead narrowly
rounded. Anterior antennae slender, 5 -jointed, and bearing a number of long plain
setEe, especially at the extremity, where there are six or seven of considerable length ; the
second and fourth joints are subequal and fully twice the length of the third joint, as
shown by the annexed formula : —
Anterior antenna;. 14 . 20 . 0 . 23 . 14
I 2 3 4 W
The basal joint of the posterior antennae short ; the primary branch moderately stout,
2-jomted ; the end joint about three-fourths the length of the first ; the integument of both
partly covered with fine cilia. Secondary branch rather longer than the first joint of the
primary branch, 8-jointed; all the joints small except the first, which is nearly equal to
the entire length of the next three ; the last joint of the principal branch and all the
joints of the secondary one are furnished with very long plumose setse (fig. 13).
Mandibles with a broad dentate biting part ; the principal branch of the palp is furnished
with long aculeate sette, and the small secondary branch with plumose setae (fig. 14).
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 65
The maxillte are well developed and provided witb a stout bilobed palp — one lobe
bearing long plumose, the other aculeate setae (tig. 15). Anterior foot-jaws large,
5-jointed, the first joint about twice the lengtli of the remaining portion, the three apical
joints very sliort ; the third and fourth joints bear each one, and the last thi-ee,
moderately long aculeate setae ; the anterior foot-jaws are also provided with four
marginal setiferous lobes — three on the first joint and one on the proximal end of the
second. Posterior foot-jaws smaller, 2-jointed, and bearing several stout marginal and
terminal setae ; the last joint is comparatively short (fig. 17). The last joint of the outer
branches of the first four pairs of swimming-feet are each provided with a long slender
terminal spine, very finely serrate on the outer and ciliate on the inner edge, and also
with several long plumose seta; ; the inner branches, which are shorter than the outer,
bear two long terminal setse, and a sub terminal one. In the first pair, which differ from
the others, the exterior margin of the outer branch is armed with three stout spines and a
subterminal spiniform seta, while the interior margin of the inner branch bears three
processes resembling somewhat the dilated bases of rudimentary hairs. The inner
margin of the second basal joint is also armed with several short spines (fig. IS).
Abdomen slender, 3-jointed, the middle segment scarcely half the length of either the
first or third. Caudal stylets very slender, once and a half the length of the abdomen,
bearing each four long terminal setae, and a small subterminal seta exteriorly, while a
moderately long seta springs from the outer margin and near the base of each stylet, as
shown in figure 21.
Rabitat. Lat. 1° 65' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms, tow-net gathering. Collected
during the day, January 22nd. Temperatuj-e of the water about 43° F. Lat. 4° 24' 7" S.,
long. 10 1' 8" E., in tow-net gatherings from 235 fathoms and 185 fathoms. Collected
between 11 a.m. and 3.30 p.m., February 5th. Temperature of the water at 200 fathoms
55° E. A considerable number of specimens were obtained in the first of the three
ffatherinajs. No males were observed.
This species has a close general resemblance to Corymira gracilis, Brady, and I was at
first incHued to ascribe it to that genus, but a further study of the structure of the animal
showed that there were differences between it and Qorijnura so important as to make its
position in that genus untenable (see remarks to description of genus, p. 61).
Genus Acartia, Dana.
Acartia, Dana, Amer. Journ. Sci. 1846 ; Brady, Report ' Chall/ Coi^ep. 1883.
Dias, Lilljcborg, Crust, ex. ord. trib. 1853 ; Glaus, Die freilebend. Copep. 1863 j Boeck, Oversigt Norg.
Copep. 1864 ; Brady, Monogr. Brit. Copep. 1878.
Acartia laxa, Dana.
1852. Acartia laxa, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1123, pi. Ixxix. figs. 5 a-c.
1883. Acartia laxa, Brady, Report ' Chall.' Copep. p. 73, pi. xxxii. figs. 1-11.
Habited. Station 2, 25 fathoms, tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
50 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Ofl' Sao Thome Island (lat. 0° 38' 6" N.,
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 9
66 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
long. 6° 25' 8" E.), 20 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection). Station 22, 20 fathoms,
February 4th (day collection). Lat. 5° 55' 1" S., long. 11° 30' 7" E., surface, Eebruary
18th (night collection), &c.
Acartia laxa was observed in 38 tow-nettings, 11 of which were surface and 27 under-
surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings ranged in depth from 5 to 235 fathoms.
Eour of the surface and 19 of the under-surface gatherings were collected during the day,
while 7 surface and 8 u.nder- surface gatherings were collected during the night, as
shown in the formula : —
f 4 day collections.
11 surface \ ^ -^^^ ^^^^0.
Tow-ncttin2:s- 38 ^ , "^ .
27 under-surface \ ^^ "^^^ ^^^"0.
J- 8 night ditto.
Acartia laxa was of frequent occurrence in nearly all of the tow-nettings in which it
was observed.
AcAiiTiA DENTICORNIS, Brady.
1883. Acartia denticornis, Brady, op. cit. j). 73, pi. xsxi. fig. 1, pi. xxxii. figs. 12-17.
Habitat. Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface tow-netting, January 27th (night col-
lection). Libreville, Gaboon River, surface, January 28th (day collection). Lat. 4° 40'
S., long. 10° 25' 2" E., surface, Eebruary 5th (night collection). Bananah Creek, Congo
Ptiver, surface, Eebruary 7th (day collection). Loanda Harbour, surface, Eebruary 13tli
(day collection).
The distribution of Acat'tia denticornis within the area dealt with in this Report appears
to have been more restricted than Acartia laxa ; it was also more confined to inshore and
surface gatherings than was that species. It is interesting to note that this apparent
preference of A. denticornis for localities more or less inshore is borne out to some extent
by the ' Challenger ' records, where the following statement occurs (loc. cit. p. 74) : —
" Abundant in Hilo Harbour, Sandwich Islands (August 1875) ; one or two specimens
noted in a gathering from the Philippine Islands and (?) in the Atlantic, north of Tristan
d'Acunha."
Acartia denticornis was obtained in 14 of the ' Buccaneer ' tow-nettings — all of them
surface gatherings. Eight of the tow-nettings were day and 6 were night collections.
The specific gravity of the water in which it occurred varied from 1*0255 to 1-0087.
ACABTIA PLUMOSA, u. sp. (PI. VII. figs. 22-32.)
Length 1'2 mm. Body elongate-ovate, somewhat rounded in front; the rounded
postero- lateral angles of the last thoracic segment bear a number of small spines.
Anterior antennae about as long as the cephalothorax, those of the female 20-jointed and
furnished witli numerous plumose setae ; the annexed formula shows the proportional
lengths of the joints ; —
18 ■ 11 . lU ■ U . 12 . 8 . 8 ■ 5 . 13 . 11 . 15 ■ 15 . 1.5 ■ ]2 . 14 ■ 15 ■ 10 ■ 18 ■ 10 ■ 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 y 10 11 12 13 14 15 It) 17 18 19 2o'
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 67
The male right antenna is 17-joiute(l ; the 11th, 12th, and 13th appear to be each
composed of two coalesced joints, indistinctly hinged between the 12th and 13th joints, both
of which are ciliate on the upper margin. On the proximal side of the hinge there is
one and on the distal side three short stout spines, as shown in fig. 8. Posterior antennae
and mouth-organs as in Faracartia spinicaiidata. The length of the joints of the inner
branches of the first pair of swimming-feet is about equal, while the first joint of the
outer branch is mvich stouter and once and a half the length of the next. The
inner branch of the fourth pair is slender, the first joint of which reaches nearly to the
middle of the second joint of the outer branch; the last joint of the outer branch is
much smaller than either of the other two joints ; the terminal spines are long and slender
(fig. 27). The fifth pair in the female are each furnished with two long setae, one of
which is submarginal and plumose and one apical ; the basal part of the plain apical seta
is considerably dilated and gibbous (figs. 29, 30). The right fifth foot in the male is
much longer than the other, and the penultimate joint, which is shorter than either the
preceding or following joints, is produced interiorly into an elongate protuberance ; the
last joint of the left foot is armed with a large spine on its inner aspect ; each foot termi-
nates in a short stout spine, and the first joint of both is furnished with a long plum se
seta on the outer margin (fig. 30). In the abdomen of the female the first segment is
about once and a half the length of the next and fully twice the length of the last
segment ; the first and second segments are sparingly dentate on the posterior margin
(tig. 31). Caudal stylets longer than the last, and nearly as long as the penultimate,
abdominal segment ; caudal setae as in Acartia Clausi. The first segment in the male
abdomen is considerably narrower than those that follow. The caudal stylets are about
three-fourths the length of those of the female and not longer than the last abdominal
segment, and furnished with setae as in the female (fig. 32).
Habitat. Bananah Creek, Congo River, in a surface gathering collected at noon,
Eebi'uary 7th; the specific gravity of the water when the gathering was made was
1"00870 ; and in Loanda Harbour, in two surface gatherings collected in the seaward part
of the Harbour during the afternoon of the loth February. The surface temperature
of the water was about 79° P.
Acartia plumosa somewhat resembles Acartia discandata (Giesb.), especially in the
male right anterior antennae and fifth pair of feet, which are quite prominent in adult
specimens.
Acartia Clausi, Giesbrecht. (PL VII. figs. 33-40.)
1889. Acartia Clausi, Giesbreclit, Rendicouti R. Accad. d. Liucei, vol. v. fasc. 11.
1892. Acartia gahoonensis, Scott (MS. name).
Length fully 1 mm. Viewed doi'sally the body is oblong-ovate, the forehead is broadly
triangular, almost truncate, with the lateral angles somewhat produced ; the last thoracic
segment has the postero-lateral angles rounded. Anterior antennae nearly as long as the
thorax, those of the female, which are 21-jointed, are sparingly setiferous, except towards
the extremity, where the last five joints bear moderately long plumose setae ; a plumose seta
9*
68 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
also springs from the 8th and 12th joints, counting from the end. The proportional
lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the formula: —
34 ■ 8 . 10 . G ■ 11 . 16 . 14 . 15 . 15 . 13 ■ 11 . 16 . 15 ■ 18 . 15 ■ 15 . 17 . 9 ■ 16 ■ 10 . 6
12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21'
The jointing of the proximal half of the antennae was somewhat indistinct and required
a high power of the microscope and careful focussing to make out the articulations.
The right anterior antenna of the male is 15-jointed, and hinged between the 11th and
12th joints; both of these joints are fringed with small teeth on the upper margin, while
a moderately stout spine springs from the jiroximal end of the 12th joint (fig. 35) ; the
male antennoe are sliorter than those of the female, and are provided with a greater
number of plumose setse. The posterior antennae and mouth-organs resemble those of
Paracartia spiiiicaudata. The first four pairs of swimming-feet also resemble those of that
species. The fifth pair in the female have the apex subtriangular and are each furnished
interiorly with an elongate stout spine, serrate on the inner margin of the distal half
and exteriorly with a long plumose seta (fig. 31). In the male the fifth pair are com-
paratively short and stout, as in Acartia denticornis, Brady ; the proximal joint of each
is furnished on the exterior margin with a long plumose seta (fig. 38). Abdomen in the
female short, stout, and composed of three segments ; the first is longer than both the
other two together, the second is about equal in length to the third ; the posterior margin
of the first and second joints is fringed with small teeth. The caudal stylets are some-
what longer than the last abdominal segment, and are each provided with six plumose
setfB arranged as follows : — one, strongly curved, near the middle of the exterior margin ;
one subterminal ; three terminal, tlie middle one being much longer than any of the
others ; and one (small) on the lower half and near the inner margin of the stylet. The
abdomen in the male is composed of five segments ; the first is rather narrower than the
next, and the penultimate one is very short. The stylets are shorter than those of the
female, but the number and arrangement of the plumose sette are similar (fig. 34).
Habitat. Lil^reville, Gaboon River, in a surface gathering collected at midday, January
28th. The surface temperature of the water was 83°'l P., and the specific gravity 1'02301.
This Acartia resembles Acartia denticornis, Brady, in several of its characters, but
differs in some important points, especially in the armature and proportional length of
the joints of the male right anterior antenna and in the form of the male and female
fifth feet and abdomen.
Subgenus Paracartia, n. subgen.
Near Acartia, Dana, but differing very markedly in the form of the fifth pair of feet,
wliich in the female are each armed with a stout curved spine ; in the male the fifth pair
are large and unsymmetrical, that of the left side being about half the length of the
right ; the male right antenna has also the joints of the proximal half somewhat tumid,
as in Pontella.
FEOM THE GULF OF GULS'EA. 69
PaRACARTIA SPINICAUDATA, 11. sp. (PL VIII. figs. 1-11.)
Female. Length 1-25 mm. Ceplialotborax elongate, rather tumid, rounded in front,
the postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment acute. Anterior antenna as long
as the cephalothorax, 20-jointed, and hearing a number of long plumose setaj distrilnited
as follows— one on each of the 2nd, 3ixl, 1th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 13th, 15th, IGth, and 18th
joints, two (one smaller than the other) on the 19th, and five on the last joint. The
7th joint is about as long as all the preceding three together ; the 12th and last joints
are shorter than the others. The proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as in the
annexed formula : —
30 . 16 ■ 9 . 13 . 11 . 9 . 30 ■ 15 . 10 . 15 . 15 . 12 . 6 . 14 ■ 12 . 16 . 13 ■ 15 ■ U ■ 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20"
Posterior antennae, mouth-organs, and first four pairs of swimming-feet as in Acartia
luxa, except that the last joint of the outer branch of the first swimming-feet has the
lower exterior surface setose. Pifth pair of feet small, 1-branched, the basal part
short and tumid and furnished Avith a stout curved spine, the distal half of which is
strongly toothed on both margins ; exteriorly and close to the spine and about a third of
its length is a small plain seta ; the right and left branches are alike. Abdomen short,
3-jointed ; tlie first segment is somewhat triangular in form and has the distal end
fully twice the breadth of tlie next segment ; it is also longer than both the second and
last segments together. Caudal stylets short and broad, rather longer than the last
abdominal segment, each stylet armed with a prominent and strong terminal spine and
two setae, one on each side of the spine ; there are also two setse on the exterior margin
of the stylets, and a third, Avith a distinct basal part, a little above the inner of the two
terminal setae. The terminal spines, which are about double the length of the stylets,
and all the setae, except the one last described, are plumose.
Rubltat. Eananah Creek, Congo Eiver, in one surface tow-nettiug collected at noon
and in another collected at 4.30 p.m. February 7th, 1886. Several specimens, all females,
were obtained in these two tow-nettings.
The more obvious characters which serve to distinguish this species are the fifth
feet and the peculiar form of the abdomen.
Pakacautia dubia, n. sp. (PL VII. tigs. 41, 42 ; PL VIII. figs. 12-15.)
Male. Length about 1-2 mm. Body elongate, broadly subtriangular in front, and
rounded posteriorly, composed of five segments ; head indistinctly separated from the
thorax. Anterior antennae about as long as the body, that of the left side provided with
a number of moderately long setae, 20-jointed, the proportional lengths of the joints being
nearly as shown in the formula : —
16 ■ 14 ■ 6 ■ 5 ■ 5 . 8 . 10 . 10 . 12 . 11 ■ 9 ■ 20 ■ 20 . 15 . 12 . 16 . 11 . 18 . 10 . 8
~1 2" 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18^ 19 20"
The proximal half of the right antenna, which bears several long plumose hairs,
has the lower portion somewhat dilated ; there is a hinged articulation between the fifth
70 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
and sixth joints, counting from the end. The sixth joint, which is nearly as long as the
remaining' portion of the antenna, has a rounded excavation on the upper edge and near
the proximal end; the lower side of the excavation is produced into a stout tooth-like
lobe ; the fifth joint, still counting from the end of the antenna, is about half the length
of tlie preceding, and bears a styloid process on its upper margin and a long plumose
seta at the upper distal angle ; the ultimate and penultimate joints are also furnished
Avith a number of long plumose setae (PI. VII. fig. 42). The posterior antennae and
mouth-organs as in Paracartia spinicaudata. The first four pairs of swimming-feet
similar to those of Acartia. The fifth pair is largely develojied, that of the right side
large, 4-jointed, the first and second joints stout, the other two slender, elongate; the
fourth joint appears as if it were articulated to the side of the third. There is a stout
digitiform process on the inner side of the upper half of the second joint, and near the
middle of the third joint the outer margin is produced into a bluntly triangular lobe ; the
last joint bears an apical appendage, the basal part of which is tumid, the extremity
slender and setiform. The right foot has an inner rudimentary second branch composed
of one joint about equal in length to the first joint of the outer branch. The left foot,
which is stout, scarcely reaches to the middle of the second joint of the principal branch
of the right foot, and appears to be 3-jointed ; the second joint is furnished with a
membraneous, curved (?) sexual process, as shown in figure 9. Abdomen composed of five
segments, the first short, of greater width than the next, the outline of the sides rounded
(PL VIII. fig. 15) ; the second and third joints are long, while the combined length of
the fourth and fifth is scarcely equal to the third. The stylets are somewhat longer
than the last abdominal segment, and have the third apical seta, counting from the
outside, considerably longer than any of the others.
Habitat. Loan da Harbour, in material collected with surface tow-net, on the afternoon
of Pebruary 15th. Several specimens, males only, were obtained.
As females only of Paracartia spinicaudata, and males only of P. dubia, were obtained
in the tow-net gathering from Loanda Harbour, it is just possible that they may both
belong to the same species, but the difference between the two is so considerable and so
marked that it seems better, for the present at least, to describe them under separate
names.
A species described and figured by I. C. Thompson in the ' Proceedings of the
Liverpool Biological Society,' vol. ii. p. Ill (1888), as Acartia verrucosa, resembles
somewhat the Paracartia spinicaudata of this Report ; but the difference in the form of
the fifth feet and in other important details is great enough to render them at least
specifically distinct.
Genus iEiiDius, Brady.
Aitidtus, Brady, Report ou the Copepoda of the ' Challenger' Expedition, 1883.
J^TiDius AiiMATUS, Brady.
1883. ALitdhis armatus, Brady, Report ' Chall.-" Copep. p. 7G, pi. x. figs. 5-16.
Habitat. Station 2, 5 fathoms tow-netting, January 1st (night collection). Lat. 3° 58'
FEOM THE GTJLF OF GUINEA. 71
N., long. 3° 42' W., 50 fathoms, January 13tli (day collection). Lat. 3° 55' 3" N., long.
4° 7' 3" E., 30 fathoms, January 20th (day collection). Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 0" 34"
N., long. 6'' 31' 6" E.), 20 fatlioms, January 23rd (day collection). Station 3, 135 fathoms,
Fehruary 5th (day collection).
JEtidius armatus occurred in 19 toAV-nettings, all of which -were under-surface col-
lections and ranged in depth from 5 to 460 fathoms ; 2 of the tow-nettings were collected
during the night, the other 17 were day collections. With one exception, all the
tow-nettings were from 20 fathoms or more, and eleven of them from 50 fathoms and
over. The difference between the bathymetrical distribution of this species and of Acartia
denticornis is very marked, the Acartia having been observed only in surface gatherings.
The distribution of ^tidius was nearly coextensive with the area examined, aud
in some of the tow-nettings it was of comparatively frequent occurrence. The strong
curved rostrum, and the sj)inous and strongly produced lateral angles of the last
thoracic segment, are so conspicuoiis as to make the species readily distinguished from
other Copepoda. It was obtained at five of the ' Challenger ' stations, one of which
(Station 348, lat. 3 10' N., long. 14 51' W.) was in the vicinity of the area traversed by
the ' Buccaneer.'
iETiDius ARMiGER (Gicsbrecht). (PI. VIII. figs. 16-27.)
1892. Gaetanm armiger, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Copepoden), p. 224,
pi. xiv. figs. 19, 20, 22, 26, 28, pi. xxxvi. figs. 2, 6.
Female. Length, exclusive of tail-setae, 2*6 mm. (about 1-lOtli of an inch). The male is
rather smaller than the female. Body robust, composed of four segments, the first
segment more than twice the entire length of the other three, rounded anterioi-ly and
furnished with a prominent sharp-pointed rostriim. The postero-lateral angles of the
last thoracic segment are produced backward into spiniform processes as long as the
first abdominal segment. Anterior antennae reaching to the extremity of the abdomen,
alike in both sexes, and composed of 24 joints, which are sparingly setiferous ; the
prof brtional lengths of the joints nearly as in the formula : —
!) ■ (i ■ 3 ■ 3 ■ 3 ■ 3 ■ 4 ■ 0 ■ .3 ■ .3 . 4 ■ 6 ■ .5 ■ 6 . 7 ■ 7 ■ T ■ t) ■ 8 ■ 7 . 8 ■ 8 . 7 . 3
1 1' 3 4 5 (i 7 8 'J 10 11 12 13 14 1-5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24'
The basal joint of the posterior antennte wants the three setae shown in Brady's figure
of u'Etidiiis armatus ; the first joint of the secondary branch is small, the second larger,
the third, fourth, and fifth small and bearing each a long plumose seta ; the sixth joint
is fully one third the length of the whole branch, and furnished with one plain and three
long plumose terminal setae. Mandibles and maxillae as in ^E. armatus ; one of the two,
small intermediate digits of the maxilla-palp terminates in a spiniform plumose seta.
Foot-jaws also similar to those of ^TJtidius armatus, except that the two outer marginal
lobes of the anterior foot-jaw terminate each in a stout elongate spine, ciliate on the
inner edge ; and the inner distal angle of the basal joint of the second foot-jaw forms a
blunt, rounded process, the end of wliich is ciliate and bears a few setae (fig. 22). The
72 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
lirst four pairs of swimming-feet resemble those of ^tidius armatus, except that the
second joint of the inner branch of the second pair is shorter than the other. Fifth pair
in the male small, each composed of a basal joint and two 1-jointed branches ; the outer
branch is comparatively large and bears two small unequal teeth at the extremity ; the
inner branch is small and rudimentary, with a rounded end. Abdomen in both sexes
composed of five (?) segments, the last segment very small, the other segments in the male
al)domen subequal ; in that of the female the first segment is large and tumid, the
second smaller, while the third and fourth are about equal and smaller than the second.
Caudal stylets short and broad, and furnished with four long and two very small
terminal plumose setse.
HaUtat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. h° 55' 5" E., 360 and 460 fathoms, January 22nd
(day collection). Station 23, 135 fathoms, February 5th (day collection), ^tkl'ms
armiger, of which only two or three specimens have been obtained, is quite distinct
from ^. armatus, being readily distinguished by the difference in the form of the male
fifth feet, and by the peculiar spiny armature of the forehead and last thoracic segment.
Genus Clausocalanus, Giesbrecht, 1888.
Drepanopus, Brady (in part).
Clausocalanus fukcatus (Brady).
1883. Drepanopus furcatus, Brady, Report of the ' Challenger ' Copepoda, p. 77, pi. iv. figs. 1 & .2 ;
pi. xxiv. figs. 12-15.
1892. Clausocalanus furcatus, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Copepodeu) ,
p. 194, pi. xxxvi. figs. 32, 33, 35.
Hahltat. Station 2, 25 fathoms (night collection), January 1st. Lat. 3° 58' N., long.
3° 42' W., 25 fathoms (day collection), January 13th. Off Sao Thome Island (lat.
O'^ 34' N., long. 6" 30' 4" E.), 10 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection). Station 23,
10 fathoms, February 5th (day collection). Lat. 6° 39' 5" S., long. 11° 24' 7" E.. surface,
February 8th (night collection), &c.
This species occurred in 20 tow-nettings, 3 of which were surface and 17 under-surface
gatherings. The under-surface gatherings were from various depths ranging from 2^ to
50 fathoms. The 3 surface tow-nettings were night collections ; 11 of the under-
surface were day and 0 were night collections, as shown by the formula : —
rno day collections.
..• onf ^'^'"^^^^ I 3 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 20< ^„ , "^ ,.,
1 17 under-surface Pl ^^^y ^1^*^.
L 6 nisht ditto.
Clausocalanus latipes, n. sp. (Provisional name.) (PL VIII. figs. 28-37.)
Female. Anterior antennse long and slender, provided with a very few short setae and
FEOM THE GITLF OF GUINEA. 73
composed of 23 joints, the proportional lengths of the joints being nearly as shown in
the formula : —
3.5.2.2.2.2.2.4.2.2.3.3.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.5.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 iTTS 19 20 21 22 23'
The posterior antennae nearly as in Drepaiwjms pectinalas. Mandibles well developed,
strongly dentiferous on the biting-edge, and furnished with a large two-branched palp
one branch being 2-, the other '1-jointed (fig. 29). Anterior foot-jaws 4-jointed, the last
two very small; marginal lobes six, tive of tliem large, each with two (or three) plumose
terminal setae; the other small, forming the base of a single plain seta; three plain
sette spring from the last joint of this foot-jaw. The posterior foot-jaws are 7-jointed ;
the first and second joints are large, subequal, and longer than the entire length of the
next three ; the third to the last joints are small and furnished with a few plumose hairs
(fig. 31). First pair of swimming-feet similar to those of Drepanopus pect'matits, but
there are longer spines on the outer distal angles of the first two joints of the outer
branch, and the inner distal angle of the second basal joint tei'minates in a short spine
instead of a plumose hair. The three following pairs are also similar to Drepanopvs
pectinatus, except that the distal margin of the second basal joint is strongly denticulated
in the second pair, and in the third 2iair is furnished with a few large spiuiform teeth ; the
tei'minal spines of the outer branches are long and broad, and finely serrate on the outer
margin. The fifth pair are robust, simple, and composed of two 2-jointed branches of
unequal length ; in the short branch the last joint is much smaller than the other and
terminates in three conical tooth-like prolongations ; in the other branch, which is at
least twice the length of the short one, the last joint is rather longer than the first, and
bears a small spine near the middle of the outer margin and three spiniform teeth at the
extremity (fig. 35). The abdomen is composed of four segments, the first longer tlian
the others, the next two subequal, the last small. Caudal stylets about as long as the
last abdominal segment and bearing four plumose terminal hairs.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 fathoms.
One specimen only of this species has been obtained ; it appears to be a female. While
agreeing with Drepanopxis in its more important details of structure, Clausocalanus
latipos differs from both the species described in the Report on the ' Challenger '
Copepoda, especially in the number and proportional length of the joints of the anterior
antennae autl in the form of the fifth feet. It agrees in some respects with Clausocalanus
furcatus, Brady, but in that species, the inner branches of the second pair of swimming-
feet are 1-jointed, the fifth pair and the anterior antennae also differ cousideraljly, so
that for the present it seems better to consider the species as distinct.
Clausocalanus aecuicornis (Dana). (PI. VIII. figs. 38-47.)
1849. Calanus arcnicornis, Dana, Amer. Journ. Sc. vol. viii.
1892. ClauavcaJa litis arcuicornis, Giesbrecht, op. cit. p. 193, pis. ], 2, 10, 3G.
Length, not including tail-setae, 1-3 mm. Body elongate, composed of five segments,
SECOKD SEIUES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 10
74 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
the first nearly tAvice t)ie entire length of the other four. Porehead rovinded, produced
into a sniall, sharp-pointed rostrum. Anterior antennre slender, as long as the cephalo-
thorax, 20-jointed, and sparingly setiferous, the proportional lengths of the joints as in
the formula : —
34 . 4. 4. 4. 4. 3.3. 4.4.4. 4. 10 . 16 . 10 . 12 . 12 . 18 . 15 . 18 . 22
"T 2 3 4 5 0 7 « 0 10 11 12 13 14 1-5 16 17 18 19 20'
The first joint is stout and long, and the second considerahly broader than those
immediately following. The primary branch of the posterior anteunfe is short and
2-jointed ; the secondary branch is fully twice the length of the other, and composed of
six joints ; the second joint is long and about equal to the entire length of the next four ;
the third, fourth, and fifth joints are very small (fig. 39). Mandible-palp small, one
branch is 4-, the other 2-jointcd (fig. 40). Maxillte nearly as in Brepanoiyus j^ectiiuctiis.
Anterior foot-jaw very small, with four (or five) marginal setiferous lobes. Posterior
foot-jaw small, 7-jointed, and bearing a few spinous setoe ; the first and second joints are
elongate, the third short, the fourth about twice the length of the third, the fifth about
equal to the third and as long as the next two together (fig. 44). The first four pairs of
swimming-feet resemble those of Drepanopus pectinatns, except that the first two joints
of the outer branch of the first pair have no spines on the exterior distal angles. The
fifth pair are simple and consist of one very short 2-jointed In'anch, and one which is long
and 4-jointed ; the last joint of the short branch is very small and terminates in three
small spines ; the extremity of the long branch terminates on one side in a digitiform
lobe, which is opposed by a finger-like process, articulated to the l)asal part of the lobe ;
both are fringed wdth fine cilia (fig. 45). Abdomen 5-jointed, the last segment very
small. Caudal stylets short, length about equal to the breadth, each furnished with
four plumose terminal seta?.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Lat. 3^ 58' N., long. 3° 42' W., 25 and 50 fathoms,
January 13th (day collection). Off Accra, 3 fathoms, January 16th (night collection).
Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 3C0 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection). Off
Sao Thome Island, 20 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection).
Males only of this species were obtained.
Genus Phylloptjs, Brady.
Phyllopus, Bi-ady, Report on the Copep. of tlie Chall. Exp. 1883.
Phylloptjs bidentatus, Brady. (PL \1. figs. 26-28.)
1883. P/tyllopus bkkntatus, Brady, Report Cluill. Copep. p. 78, pi. v. figs. 7-14.
Habitat. Station 2, 5 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N.,
long. 6° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms, January 22ud (day collection). Temperature of water
at 360 fathoms about 43' E.
Three specimens only of this curious form were obtained, and they were all more or
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 75
less damaged ; two of them were carefully dissected, from tliese dissections figures have
been prejiared of a few of the more important details, not represented in the ' Challenger '
Report. I have also been enabled to add tlie following description : — Secondary branch
of the anterior antennfe nearly twice the length of the primary branch, 8-jointed, the
last nearly as long as the preceding six joints, and furnished with four terminal hairs.
Both branches of the first four pairs of swimming-feet 3-jointed, the middle joint of the
outer branch of the first pair shortest, bearing a comparatively long, slightly curved,
setiferous spine on the exterior distal angle ; the last joint has two shorter and more
slender spines on its outer margin, and a long slender terminal spine, both branches
furnished with numerous, long, plumose setse. In the second, tiiird, and fourth pairs
the inner are much shorter than the outer branches ; the three joints of the outer
branches are each armed with a stout dagger-like spine at tlie outer distal angles ; the
last joint has two similar additional spines inserted in excavations of the outer margin,
and a broad falciform terminal spine, finely serrate on the outer margin ; both branches
are well furnished with plumose seta3. The fifth pair in the female resemble the figured
example in the ' Challenger ' Report, but theii* form seems to vary somewhat in different
specimens, both as regards the serration of the last joint, and also the comparative length
and breadth of the joints. Abdomen in the female 4-jointed, first joint much larger
than the others and dilated. Caudal stylets short, not divergent, each with five long,
plumose terminal sette, the second from the inside longer than the others.
The mouth is a short tube ; the front part projects outward and backward so as to
form an oblique opening. The edge of the upper part of the tube has a dense fringe of
hairs, which can be readily observed if tlie specimen be in a favourable position.
Judging from a careful examination of the ' Buccaneer ' specimens, I am inclined to
think that the figures in the ' Challenger ' R-eport represent a female instead of a
male.
Genus Temora, Baird.
Temora, Baird, Brit. Entomostraca, 1850.
Diaptoinus, Lubbock, Trans. Eutoin. Soc. 1856.
Temora stylifeka (Dana).
1849. Calanus stylifer, Dana, Amer. Joiu"n. Sci. vol. viii.
185G. D'utptomus dubius, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. vol. iv. n. s. p. 21, pi. ii. figs. 1-7.
1883. Temora dubia, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 79, pi. xxv. figs. 1-17.
Kahitat. Station 2, surface and 25 fathoms, January 1st (night collections). Station 9,
25 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Station 11, 10 fathoms, January 19th
(day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms, January 22nd
(day collection). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface, January 27th (one day and one
night collection). Libreville, Gaboon River, surface, January 28th (day collection).
Station 23, 10, 20, 135, and 185 fathoms, Pebruary 5th (day collections). Bananah
10*
76 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Creek, Congo Pviver, surface, February 7th (two day collections). Lat. S'' 55' 1" S.,
long. 11° 30' 7" E., February 18th (night collection).
Temora stylifera was observed in 105 tow-nettings, 61 of them surface and 4-1 under-
surface gatherings : of the surface gatherings 25 were collected during the day and
36 during the night ; of the under-surface gatherings, which ranged in depth from 2 to
360 fathoms, 37 were collected during the day and 7 during the night, as shown by the
annexed formula : —
r 25 day collections.
... . n- r^^ '"'^''''^ 1 36 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 10o{ r^n a v,,
1 44 under-surface (37 day ditto.
1. 7 night ditto.
This was one of the more common and generally distributed species in the ' Buccaneer '
collection ; it also appears to be one of the most common of the extra-European
Copepoda.
Temora longicornis (Muller). (PI. VII. fig. 47.)
1785 ?. Cyclops longicornis, Muller, Eiitom. p. 115, t. xix. figs. 7-9.
1850. Temora finmarchica, Baird, Brit. Eiitom. p. 228, pi. xxviii. figs. 1 a-g.
1849?. Calanus turbinatus, Dana, Amer. Journ. Sc. vol. viii.
1857. I>iaptomus longicaudatus, Lubbock, Aun. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2, vol. xx. pi. x. figs. 11, 12;
pi. xi. figs. 12, 13.
1878. Temora longicornis, Brady, Monogr. Brit. Copep. vol. i. p. 54, pi. iii. figs. 10-19.
Bahitat. Lat. 7° 33' N., long. 15° IS' W., surface, midnight, January 2nd. Station 9,
50 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Off Accra, 3 fathoms, January 15th
(night collection). Same locality, January 16th, surface, night collection, and 3 fathoms,
day collection. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 35 and 460 fathoms, January 22nd
(day collections). Libreville, Gaboon lliver, surface, January 28th (day collection).
Bananah Creek, Congo River, surface, February 6th (day collection). Loanda Harbour,
surface, February 13th (day collection), and again on the 15th in the seaward part of the
Harbour, also surface (day collection). Lat. 5° 40' 8" S., long. 11° 33' 4" E., surface,
February 19th, &c. (day collection).
This Temora was observed in 57 tow-nettings, 40 of which were surface and 17 under-
surface gatherings ; 16 of the surface gatherings and 12 of the under-surface were day
collections, while 24 surface and 5 under-surface were night collections, as shown by
the formula : —
r 16 day collections.
,,. ^ rlOs^ii-foce 1 24 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 57 < ^ , ,.
b7 under-surface (12 day ditto.
I 5 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings were from depths ranging from 3 to 50 fathoms, and
one from 135 and another from 460 fathoms.
Temora longicornis was not only generally distributed throughout the area examined,
FEOM THE GULP OF GUINEA. 77
but was a moderately common sjiecics in some of the tow-nettings in which it occui-red.
This species is readily distinguished from either Temora slylifera (Dana) or Temora
armata, Claus, by having the last thoracic segment in both sexes rounded at the
postero-lateral angles. The first pair of swimming-feet have the inner branches more
or less distinctly 2-jointed. The male fifth pair (fig. 1-7) differ somewhat from the same
pair of feet in British specimens, but otherwise the ' Buccaneer ' specimens agree with
those of the British seas.
Genus Centropages, Kroyer.
Centropaijes, Kroyer, Nat. Tidskr. 1849 ; Boeck, Oversigt Norges Copep. 18G4 ; Brady, Monogr. Brit.
Copep. 1878.
Caiopia, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Sci. 1819.
Calano/iid, id. (in part) Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. IS.oS.
Ichthyophorba, Lilljeborg, De Crust, ex. ord. trib. 1853; Claus, Die freilcbendcn Copepoden, 1803.
Centropages epvAchiatus (Dana).
1852. Calanopia brachiutu, Daua, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1133, pi. Ixxix. figs. 7 a,h.
1883. Centropages brachiatiis, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 82, pi. xxvi. figs. 1-7.
KaUtat. Lat. 7° 33' N., long. 15° 18' W., surface, January 2nd (midnight collection).
Lat. 5° 10' N., long. 2," 5C' 2" AY., surface (close inshore), January 12th (night collection).
Station 21, surface, February 4th (day collection). Station 23, 20 fathoms, February 5th
(day collection). Bananah Creek, Congo Ptiver, surface, February 7th (two day collec-
tions). Loauda Harbour, surface, February 13th (day collection).
Centropucjes brachiatus was observed in 37 tow-nettings, comprising 28 surface and
9 under-surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings included two at 3 fathoms,
two at 10 fathoms, one at 20 fathoms, two at 25 fathoms, and two at 50 fathoms.
14 of the surface and G of the under-surface gatherings were day collections, while 14
surface and 3 under-surface were night collections, as shown by the formula : —
r 14 dav collections.
..• ^.r-8«"^"^^«^ 1 14 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 3/< "l ^. ^ '^ ^.^^
l 9 under-surface I & clay ditto.
I 3 night ditto.
This, thotigh occurring in a considerable number of tow-ncttings, was by no means a
common species. The size of the ' Buccaneer ' specimens agreed with those of the
'Challenger' collections, viz. 8-lOOths of an inch=about 2 mm. (not 4-4 mm. as stated
in the ' Challenger ' Report).
Centropages fifrcatus (Dana).
1852. Catopid furcata, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. J 173, pi. Ixxix. figs. 1 a-d.
1883. Centropages fur catus, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 83, pi. xxviii. figs. 1-11.
Bubltat. Lat. 7° 33' N., long. 15° 18' W., surface, January 2nd (midnight collection).
Lat. 5° 10' X., long. 3° 56' 2" AV., surface (close inshore), January 12th (night collection).
78 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 6° 56' 5" E., 10 and 30 fathoms, January 22ncl (day collections).
Libreville, Gaboon River, surface, January 28th (two day collections). Lat. 5° 5G' 5" S.,
long. 11° 17' 2" E., surface, Eebruary 8tli (night collection). Loanda Harbour (seaward),
surface, Eebruary 1-Jth, &c. (day collection).
This Centropages was observed in 49 tow-nettings, 33 of whicli were surface and 16
under-surfaee gatherings ; 11 of the surface and 11 of the under-surface tow-nettings
were day collections, and 22 surface and 5 under-surface were night collections, as shown
by the annexed formula : —
11 day collections.
I
122
T H- ,^ r^^ ^^^^'^^^^ 1 22 night ditto,
low-nettings 19 < «. &
Lie under-surface | ^^ ^^y ditto.
(. 5 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings were from depths ranging from 3 to 50 fathoms. This
species can be readily distiuguished, even in the immature stages, by the characteristic
ai'mature of the last thoracic segment.
Centropages violacetjs (Claus).
1863. Ichthi/ophorba violacea, Claus, Die freilebenden Copep. p. 199, pi. xxxi. figs. 13, 14.
1883. Centropages violaceus, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 83, pi. xxvii. figs. 1-14.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 25 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 0° 32' 7" N., long. 6° 31' 6" E.),
10 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection). Lat. 1^ 47' 7" S., long. 8° 21' 3" E., surface,
Eebruary 4tli, &c. (night collection).
Centropages violaceus was obtained in 11 tow-nettings, one of which was a surface
(night) gathei'ing, and the other 10 under-surface gatherings ; G of the under-surface
gatherings were day, and 4 were night collections, as shown by the formula : —
r 0 day collection.
r 1 surface 1 i uight ditto.
Tow-nettmgsll<^ r ^ n n r
1 10 under-surface/^ 'W collections.
I 4 night ditto.
Eour of the under-surface gatherings were from 10 fathoms, two from 15 fathoms,
one from 20 fathoms, two from 25 fathoms, and one from 50 fathoms.
This Centropages was much rarer in the ' Buccaneer ' collections than the other
two species recorded in the ' Challenger ' collection. On the other hand, it was the more
common of the three species of Centropages observed by Dr. Brady. Centropages
violaceus differs from the other two species in having the postero-lateral angles of the
last thoracic segment rounded oflP instead of being produced into spinous processes. No
indication of colour could be detected in the ' Buccaneer ' sijecimens. Tliis was probably
due to their long immersion in spirit, which had extracted the colour characteristic of
the species.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 79
Genus Temokopia, n. gen. (Provisional name.)
Anterior antennae ? 22- or ? 23-jointed ; the right antenna of the male 19-joiuted,
hinged between the 15th and 16th joints. Posterior antenn!3e and mouth-organs as in
Calanus. Inner branch of the first pair of swimming-feet 2-jointed, of the second, third,
and fourth pairs 3-jointed. Pifth pair in the female simple, alike on both sides, and
each composed of a single 3-jointed branch ; in the male the fifth pair, which are
prehensile, and each composed of a single branch, are large and conspicuous. The
female abdomen consists of four and the male of live segments ; the first segment in the
female is considerably dilated.
Temoropia mayumbaensis, n. sp. (PL VIII. figs. 18, 49 ; PL IX. figs. 1-12.)
Length '93 mm. Body elongate-ovate, composed of five segments ; the first segment,
which is about as long as the combined length of the next three, is indistinctly articu-
lated at the upper half. Porehead broadly triangular. Anterior antennae of the female
? 22- or ? 23-jointed.* The right anterior antenna of the male scarcely reaches to the
end of the thorax, is sparingly setiferous, and 19-jointed, constricted between the 11th
and 12th, and hinged between the 15th and 16th joints ; the proportional length.s of the
joints as in the formula : —
Male : 30 . 10 . 8 . 8 . 9 . 6 . 7 ■ 8 . fl . 9 . 14 . 27 . 11 . 12 . 27 . 28 . 17 . 15 . 22
Eight anterior antenna. ^ 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 11 11' 13 14 15 10 17 18 19 '
Posterior antennae and mouth-organs as in Calanus. The inner branches 6f the first
pair of swimming- feet are 2-joiuted ; the inner branches of the second, third, and fourth
pairs 3-jointed ; the first joint is short, while the last is equal to the combined length of
the preceding two joints. Pifth pair of feet in the female simple, each composed of a
single 8-joiuted branch, one branch being rather longer than tlie other ; the first joint
in both is somewhat dilated ; the inner distal angle of the second joint is furnished
with a spiniforra seta nearly as long as the last joint ; the last joint has a conical and
pointed extremity with a small tooth-like process on the inner margin. The fifth pair
in the male is large and conspicuous ; tlie right foot is composed of two moderately
large joints, which decrease in breadth towards the extremity, and terminates in a
long slender curved spine. The left foot, which consists of three broad joints, has an
excavation at the apex in Avhich the terminal sjjine of the foot probably interlocks, wliUe
a long curved spine springs from the end of the first joint (PL IX. fig. 9). The abdomen
in the female consists of four, in the male of five, segments; the first segment in the
female is considerably swollen, and is produced ventrally and posteriorly into a large
rounded process (PL IX. fig. 10). Caudal stylets short, each furnished with three stout
plumose terminal seta3, and a small seta on the inner margin.
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 6° 55' 5" E., 35 and 360 fathoms (day collections).
Station 23 (lat. 1° 26' 7" S., long. 10° 1' 8" E.), 235 fathoms (day collection).
* The basal portions only of the anterior antenn;e of all the females, and of tho left antenna of all the males,
remain iutact ; tboy were broken off, mostly, at the end of the eighth joint; but, judging from the number of joints
in the male right antenna, the female antenme probably consist of twenty-two or twenty-three joints.
80 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
About twenty specimens of this species were obtained in tow-nettings from the
localities described ; tlie specimens were all more or less imperfect, especially tbe
anterior antennae and swimming-feet.
The specific name has reference to Mayuraba, a place on the coast near Station 23,
one of the two localities where the species was obtained.
Genus Mectnoceba, I. C. Thompson (1888).
1888. Mecynocera, I. C. Thompson, Jouru. Liun. Soc. (Zoology) vol. xx. p. 146.
Mectnocera clatjsii, I. C. Thompson. (PI. I. figs. 27-3i ; PI. II. 7-10.)
1888. Mecynocera clausii, I. C. Thompson, Jouni. Linn. Soc. (Zoology) vol. xx. p. 140, pi. xi.
figs. 1-4.
Length fully 1 mm. Female somewhat longer than the male. Body elongate,
slender. Cephalothorax composed of six segments ; viewed dorsally the first is almost
cylindrical ; forehead somewhat angularly rounded ; the postero-lateral angles of the
last segment are rounded. Anterior antennae fully twice the length of the animal,
slender, 2i-jointcd ; the Kith to the 20th joints are considerably longer than any of the
others ; several of the middle joints of both antennce in male and female are provided
with longitudinal rows of small spiniform teeth ; two, or even three, rows were observed
on some of the joints, on others only one row ; the antenna; are sparingly setiferous
(PI. I. fig. 31). The annexed formula shows the proportional lengths of the joints : —
7 . 14 . 7 . 7 . 7 . 7 . 7 . 12 . 12 . 10 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 17 . 18 . 22 . 24 . 29 . 26 . 24 . 18 . 12 . 8 .14
1 2 3 4 .5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15~10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24"
The basal joint of the posterior antennoe stout, primary branch 2-jointed (exclusive of
the basal joint), the first being nearly a third longer than the other; secondary branch
7-jointed ; the second joint is longer than the first, and nearly equal to the entire length
of the next four ; the tliird to the last joints very short (PI. I. fig. 30). Mandible-palp
well developed, 2-branched, basal part stout, distally narrowed and jiroduced to form
the base of the 1-jointed branch ; the second branch, which occupies a submarginal
position, is ^-jointed (PL II. fig. 7). Poot-jaws and swimming-feet nearly as in
RJdncalanus, except that the inner branches of the first swimming-feet are 1-joiuted,
the inner branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs are 3-jointed ; the exterior
distal angles of the joints of the outer branches are armed with short stout spines which
are curved inwardly ; the last joint of the outer branches of the fourth paix has a similar
spine on the exterior margin (PL I. fig. 33) ; the outer branches of all the first four
pairs possess long delicate terminal spines. Tlie fifth ])My are 1-branched, alike on both
sides and in both sexes ; basal portion 2-jointed, not much stouter than the terminal
portion, which is 3-jointed. There is, so far as could be observed, no terminal spine.
Caudal stylets somewhat divergent, and about two thirds the length of the last abdominal
segment ; caudal setae four, long, plumose.
Habitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms, collected January 1st. Lat. 6" 31' N., long. 12' 39' W.,
surface, collected January Gth. Lat. 1. 31' G" N., long. & H 4" W., 50 fathoms, collected
FEOM THE GrLF OP GUINEA. 81
January lltli. Oflf Sfio Thome Island (lat. 0° 34' N., long. & 30' i" E.), 20 fathoms,
collected January 23rd. Lat. 4 26' 7" S., long. 10 1' 8" E., 235 fathoms, coUcctcd
February 5th, etc.
Meci/nocera Clausii Avas observed in 16 of the tow-net collections, 1 only being
a surface gathering; the deepest under-surface gathering in which it was observed
was 235 fathoms.
1 day collection.
r 1 ciay coueciic
1 surface | 0 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 16s. ^ -, ^ . ,, ,.
1 15 under-surface/ ^^ '% collections.
I 3 night ditto.
The ' Buccaneer ' specimens of this species differed from Ilecynocera Clausii, I. C.
Thompson, as described and figured in the ' Transactions ' of the Linneau Society,
vol. xs. p. 150, pi. xi. tigs. 1-1. Ilecynocera Clavs'd is there described as wanting a fifth
pair of feet, whereas the ' Buccaneer ' specimens possess a fifth pair large enough to be
easily observed without requiring to dissect the animal to see them.
Genus Phaenna, Glaus.
Phaenna, Claus, Die freilebenden CopejDodeu, 18(53.
Phaenna spinifeea, Glaus. (PL VI. fig. 35 ; PI. VII. figs. 1, 2.)
1863. Phaenna spinifera, Clans, Die freilebenden Copepodeu, p. 189, pi. xxxi. tigs. 1-7.
Length 2'25 mm. Body globose (breadth about 1"1 mm.), composed of five segments,
the first rather longer than the next two together. Anterior antennae as long as the
cephalothorax, 2i-jointed. The proportional lengths of the joints are very nearly as
shown in the formula : —
10 .4. 3. 4. 4.4. 4. ■> .4.4. 4. 6.7.9. 9. 9. 10. 10 .8.9.7.8.9.4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24'
Sparingly setiferous ; the basal joint in the female bears on its upper margin a single
plumose seta*. The ends of the third, last, and of the basal joints bear each a plumose
hair on the underside. In the male the basal joint wants the plumose seta. The
posterior antennae have the primary branch much shorter than the secondary ; the
secondary branch 5-jointed ; the first and last joints are large, the three intermediate
ones very small, both branches furnished with long plumose hairs. Mandibles elongate,
bearing numerous small teeth at the distal ends ; mandible-palp stout, 2-branched, both
branches furnished with plumose hairs, the basal part with three short hairs on its
inner aspect. Maxillre large, foliaceous. Anterior foot-jaw.s short, truncate; joints
crowded, not clearly defined, setiferous, the apical part bearing one long, faintly serrate,
spinif orm, curved appendage ; and a number of peculiar, cylindrical processes (sense-
* " Das basale Glied triigt im weiblicheu Gescliiecbte eine befiederte Borste," Claus, loc. cil. p. 189.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 11
82 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
organs ?), densely ciliated at the extremity ; posterior foot-jaw in the female slender,
(j-jointed, the last two joints very small. Three long setaj, plumose along the upper
edge, spring from the terminal joints ; the basal joints are sparingly setiferous ; the
posterior foot-jaw is stouter in the male, and the terminal joints bear a much larger
number of setae. First pair of swimming-feet 2-branclied, the outer 3-jointed, the inner
2-jointed ; both branches with numerous stout plumose setge, the terminal spine of the
outer branch slender, and faintly serrate on the outer margin. The inner branch of the
second pair 2-jointed, of the third and fourth pairs 3-jointed and armed on the side with
fascicles of short, stout, and sharp-pointed spines ; the outer branches foliaceous and
bearing several strong spines on the exterior margin, one at the base of the first and
second joints, and three on the last joint ; the terminal spines of the outer branches of
the second, third, and fourth pairs broad, falciform, the outer margin faintly serrate.
The fifth pair wanting in the female, in the male simple, 1-branched, 5(?)-jointed, the
left branch longer and stouter than the right, with the last joint small and fringed with
hairs ; the right branch terminates in a slender spine. Abdomen in the male 5-, in the
female 4-jointed, the last joint the smallest. Caudal stylets short, divergent, and
furnished with several plumose seta3, the second seta fi'om the inside being much longer
than the others.
Habitat. Station 9, 25 and 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collections). Lat. 1 55' 5" N.,
long. 5" 55' 5" E., 35, GO, and 360 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections). Station 23,
surface, 20 and 85 fathoms, February 5th (day collections). These were the only
gatherings in which Fhaenna spinifera was obtained.
The ciliated processes of the anterior foot-jaws resemble somewhat the worm-like
sense-organs of the same appendages in Scolecithrix, but instead of being produced so
as to form lengthened hair- or " worm-"like processes, as in that genus, they are
cylindrical and truncate, and furnished with a terminal fascicle of delicate cilia.
Subfamily Pontellin.T3, Dana.
Genus Labidocera, Lubbock, 1853.
PonteUa, Dana, (in imrt), Amcr. Joum. Sci. 184-6; Claus, Die freilebeuden Copep. 1803; Brady,
Monogr. Brit. Copep. 1878 ; id. Report Chall. Copep. 1883.
Labidocera, Lubbock, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2, vol. xi. (1853).
Labidocera detrtjncata (Dana), var. intermedia. (PL VI. figs. 36-38 ; PI. VII.
figs. 3, 4.)
Length 3 mm. Ccphalothorax elongate-ovate, the postero-lateral angles of the last
thoracic segment produced, acute. Anterior antennge in the female 23-jointed, the
upper margin of the first eight or nine joints furnished with moderately short, plumose
seta3, and the lower margin with a fringe of delicate hairs extending to the 12th joint.
Right anterior antennse of the male 17-jointed, hinged between the 13th and 11th
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 83
joints, the upper margins of these joints minutely denticulate (a j-inch objective is
required to see the denticulation distinctly). The 12th joint is not denticulate.
Mandible strongly toothed; the distal end is covered exteriorly with numerous short
spinous setae arranged in oblique rows ; the two inner teeth of the mandible are large
and wide apart. The posterior foot-jaws are somewhat similar to those of Labklocera
acuta, Dana. The third segment of the right fifth foot of the male has the base
produced into a long stout spine, and at the distal end is furnished with a long curved
and slender appendage, bearing two short claw-like processes at its extremity. The
left foot is 3-jointed ; the second joint is shorter than the first, the third is about equal
in length to the second and somewhat triangular in shape ; the apex terminates in
three teeth, the middle one being the longest. The fifth pair in the female are inter-
mediate between Labidocera detruncata and Labidocera acutifrons, Dana. Abdomen in
the male 4-jointed, in the female 3-jointed ; the middle segment in the female large and
tumid, the last segment of the male abdomen smaller than the other three, which are
subequal in length.
The form here described differs from Labidocera, detruncata, as described and figured in
the ' Challenger ' Report, in the following particulars : — the right anterior male
antenna differs in the proportional length of the joints and in the absence of the
prominent denticulations on the 12th, 13th, and 11th joints, but especially on the 12th,
and also in the postero-lateral angles of the last thoracic segment being acutely and
strongly produced so as to resemble, in this respect, Labklocera acutifrovs. The fifth pair
of feet in the male of the variety here described resemble Dana's figure very closely,
much more so than that of the specimen figured in the Report on the ' Challenger '
Copepoda.
Habitat. Lat. 5° 58' N., long. 14' 20' W., surface, January 6th (one day and one night
collection). Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 0 32' 7" N., long. 6 31' 6" E.), 10 fathoms,
January 23rd (day collection). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface, January 27th and
28th (one day and one night collection). Lat. 1 30' 3" S., long. 8 8' 6" E., surface,
February 3rd (night collection). Lat. 4° 55' 9" S., long. 10 47' 3" E., surface, Feb-
ruary 5th (night collection). Lat. 5 50' 5" S., long. 11' 17' 2" E., surface, February 8th
(night collection). Lat. G 39' 5" S., long. 11 24' 7" E., surface, February 8th (night
collection).
This was comparatively a rare species in the ' Buccaneer ' collection. The above is a
full list of the localities where it was obtained.
/_
Labidoceka Dakwinii (Lubbock). (PI. VI. figs. 39-42 ; PL VII. figs. 5, 6.)
1853. Labidocera Danvinii, Lubbock, Ami. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2, vol. ii. p. 29, pi. i. figs. 1-11.
1892?. Labklucera Lubbockii, Giesbrecht, Pelag. Copep. Golfes von Neapel, p. 459, pis. 23, 25, 41.
Length, male 2" 2 ram., female 2-4 mm. The forehead is broadly rounded, and docs not
possess any angular median projection. The last thoracic segment has the lateral angles
considerably produced, and in the male more so on the right side than the left, but the
11*
84 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
same on both sides in the female. Anterior antennae 21<-jointed; the two basal joints are
moderately stout and large, several of the succeeding joints are very short, while from
the 16th to the end all the joints, but especially the 18th and 19th, are elongate and
slender. The approximate proportional lengths of the joints are shown in the formula : —
7.10.1.1.1.1.2.2.3.3.3.4..5.5.6.9.9.10.11.8.7.7.6.6
T 2 3 -4 5 6 7 « y 10 11 12 13 1-1 15 16 17 18 liJ 20 21 i'l> 23 24'
The middle joints of the right male antenna are slightly swollen ; the 3rd joint has a
number of indistinct articulations ; the 9th and 10th joints, between which is a dis-
tinctly hinged articulation, are furnished with marginal appendages that are toothed
along the upper edge ; the free portion of the appendage of the 9th joint extends hack-
ward the whole length of the preceding joint, while that of the 10th joint projects only
a little forward beyond the joint to which it belongs ; the 7th joint is about twice the
length of the preceding one, and equal to the next ; the 9tli is a little shorter than the
8th, and about half the length of the 10th ; the 11th is about two thirds the length of
the 10th, and equal to the next two together. The marginal teeth on the appendage
of the 9th joint spring from the distal end of a quadrangular base ; the basal parts of
the teeth are closely applied to each other, end to end, as shown in the enlarged drawing ;
the marginal teeth on the appendage of the lOtli joint are somewhat conical in shape,
and are slightly curved forward. The apical portion of the posterior foot-jaw is
4-jointed (PI. VI. fig. 39). The first joint of the right tif th foot of the male (fig. il) has a
broad triangular outline, and part of the outer angle is, as it were, cut off to form an
attachment for the next joint; the last joint is considerably swollen, so that the inner
marffin forms an elevated arch ; a stout curved and snoon-like claw is articulated to the
exterior portion of the joint, and the claw is opposed by a produced basal process so as
to form a prehensile organ closely resembling the beak of a bird, and giving to the
whole joint somewhat the appearance of an enlarged " bird's-liead process " observed in
species of Polyzoa. The last joint of the left foot has a bifid apex and a small blunt-
pointed tooth on its outer margin ; part of its inner surface is covered with fine cilia,
while the inner angle of the second joint is produced in the form of a ringed (? sexual)
process. Fifth pair in the female simple, the basal joints stout, with a small seta on
the proximal half ; outer branches elongate, attenuated towards the pointed apex, and
furnished exteriorly with a comparatively large subapical spine, and with a minute spine
on the interior edge. The inner branches are small, curved, stoutly spiniform, and not
half the length of the outer In-anch. The abdomen in the male is composed of four, in the
female of two segments, as shown in PL VI. fig. 12 and PI. VII. fig. 5. In the female the
caudal stylets are unequal in length ; the fourth caudal seta, counting from the outside,
in both male and female, but especially the former, is considerably long er than the others
(fig. 42). In all the female specimens obtained an apparently structureless membrane
of an irregular outline covered the greater portion of the abdome n, and extended beyond
the stylets to about halfway over the caudal setae, as shown in tig. 42.
HahiUd. Libreville, Gaboon Uiver, in surface tow-net material collected after midday,
January 28th.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 85
Tliough the Labldocera now described differs in one or two points from Sir John
Lubbock's ir<i/rfocer« JDarwiml, especially in the number of joints of the apical portion of
the posterior foot-jaws, yet its agreement with that species is closer than with Labldocera
acutifrons, Dana ; the ' Buccaneer ' specimens have therefore been ascribed provisionally
to Lubbock's species.
Labidocera acutifrons (Dana).
1852. PonteUa acutifrons, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Espcd. p. 1149, pi. Isxx. figs. Wa-h.
1883. PonteUa acutifrons, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 91, ]A. xxsv. figs. 1-13.
JIaUtat. Lat. 5° 10' N., long. 3° 50' 2" 'W., surface (close inshore), January 12th
(night collection). Near Appi (Porto Novo), surface, January 18th (day collection).
Libreville, Gaboon E-iver, surface, January 28th (two day collections). Bananah Creek,
Congo Eiver, surface, February 7th (day collection). Lat. T 54' 6" S., long. 12° 14' 7" E.,
surface, February 9th (night collection).
Tliis Labldocera was obtained in 21 tow-nettings, 20 of which were surface and 1
under-surface gatherings ; one of the under-surface gatherings was from 2J fathoms
(day collection), one from 3 fathoms (night collection), one from 10 fathoms (day
collection), and one from 50 fathoms (day collection). 10 of the surface-gatherings
were day, and 10 were night collections, as in the formula : —
10 day collections.
r iu Clay coiiecuc
r 20 surface j 10 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 24 <^ r q i vff
I 4 under-surface I 3 day ditto.
i- 1 niijht colL
ight collection.
Labldocera acutifrons was comparatively a rare species, though generally distributed
throushou.t the area examined.
'a"
Labidocera acuta (Dana).
1859. PonteUa acuta, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1150, pi. Ixxx. figs. 12 a-c.
1883. Fontella acuta, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 89, pi. xxxvi. figs. 1-12.
Sabitat. Libreville, at the mouth of the Gaboon River. Only one or two specimens
of what appeared to be this species were obtained.
Genus Pontella, Dana, 1846.
Pontia, Milne-Edwards, Hist. Nat. des Crust. (1828).
PonteUa, Dana (in part), Amer. Journ. Sc. (2) vol. i. (1816) ; Brady (in part), Eeport 'Challenger'
Copcpoda, 1883; Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Pelagische Copepoden),
1892.
Pontella inermis, Brady.
1883. PonteUa inermis, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 95, pi. xlv. figs. 10-15.
Habitat. Lat. 5' 10' N., long. 3' 56' 2" W., surface (close inshore), January 12th
86 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
(night collection). Station 21 (off tlie mouth of the Congo), sui*face, Fchruary 6th (two
day collections). Also in surface gatherings collected on the 8th February at the following
localities :— Lat. 5^ 56' 5" S., long. 11^ 17' 2" E. ; lat. 5' 54' 4" S., long. 10^ 50' 7" E. ;
lat. 6" 3' 3" S., long. 11° 7' 5" E. ; lat. 6 29' 4" S., long. 11° 24' 8" E. ; lat. 6° 39' 5" S.,
long. 11 24' 7" E. ; and on the 9th Eebruary at lat. 7' 38' S., long. 12° 3' 3" E.
Pontella inermis was observed only in tow-nettings from the localities described above.
Tliey were all surface gatherings, and comprised four day and five night collections.
Pontella secubifer, Brady.
1883. Pontella securifer, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 96, pi. xlv. figs. 1 9.
Sabitat. Lat. 3° 57' 2" N., long. 7° 42' 8" W., 2 fathoms, January 9th (night collections).
Lat. 0° 22' 4" N., long. 7 59' 8" E., surface, January 29th (day collection). Station
23, surface, day collection, Eebruary 5th. Lat. 5 56' 5" S., loQg. 11" 17' 2" E., surface,
Eebruary 8th (night collection), also on the same date at lat. 6° 3' 3" S., long. 11° 7' 5" E.,
surface (day collection) ; lat. 6° 23' 3" S., long. 11° 3' 8" E., surface (day collection) ; lat.
6 29' 4" S., long. 11° 24' 8'' E., surface (night collection). On the 9th February at lat.
7 38' S., long. 12° 3' 3" E., surface (night collection) ; lat. 8 36' 8" S., long. 12° 57' E.,
surface (day collection) ; and on Eebruary 18th at lat. 5 53' S., long. 11 31' 1" E.
A11 the tow-nettings in which Pontella securifer was obtained were surface gatherings,
and comprised five day and four night collections. This species is readily distinguished
horn, fhe, oi\\Gv FontellcB by the remarkable "hatchet-shaped" appendage of the right
male antennae. A few specimens only of this interesting species were obtained.
Pontella (?) mediterranea (Claus), var. gaboonensis, nov. var. (PI. V. figs. 43-48.)
1863. Pontell'ma mediterranea, Claus, Die freilebeiiden Copepoden, p. 211, t. ii. figs. 8-10, t. iii.
fig. 8, t. xxxvi. figs. 11, 12.
Male. Length 2' 5 mm. Nostrum with prominent frontal eye as in Vontella sectirifer,
Brady. The posterior thoracic angles scarcely produced. Anterior antennae not
reaching to the end of the thorax ; that of the left side 24-jointed ; the first and second
joints are moderately stout, the third to the eleventh are short, while the I7th,
18th, 19th, and 22nd are longer than any of the others with the exception of the basal
joints, as shown by the annexed formula : —
Left anterior 22 . 14 . 4 . 4 . 4.4.4.4.5. o ^4 .8.8. 8 . 10.14 .Ib^ IS ^ 19 . 14 . 13 . 15 . 10 . 13
anteuna. T^f'WT 5 0^ 9, 9 10 11 12 13 14" 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24'
Several of the small proximal joints are furnished with moderately long plumose
setae on the upj)er edge, and a fringe of tine hairs or cilia on the lower margin (fig, 44).
The sixth, seventh, and eighth joints of the right antenna are abruptly and considerably
dilated ; the first of the three, which is also the shortest, bears a stout elongate spine on
its upper edge (fig. 45). The tenth and eleventh joints, which arc long, and connected
together by a hinged articulation, are finely toothed along the upj)er margin ; the denti-
culations of the tenth joint apjoear to be bifid, as shown by the figure; the penultimate
FEOM THE GULF OF GUI^^EA. 87
joint is as long as the preceding and fully twice the length of the terminal joint. The
joints of the apical portion of the posterior foot-jaws gradually decrease in length towards
the extremity; the fii-st joint is about twice the length of the third, the second is as
long as the third and fourth together, the terminal joint is very small (fig. 46). Inner
branches of the first pair of swimming-feet 3-jointed, and not longer than the first
two joints of the outer branch. Inner branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs
2-jointed. The basal angle of the short, tumid, terminal joint of the right fifth foot
is produced into a moderately long digitiform process, which appears to interlock with
the spoon-like apical part of the stout angularly curved terminal claw. The last joint
of the left foot is furnished with three stout apical spines, one of which is short, while
the longer one of the other two is about equal in length to the terminal joint (fig. 48).
Abdomen composed of four (? five) segments, the first and third segments are considerably
longer than the others. Caudal stylets longer than the third abdominal segment ; the
fourth seta of eanh stylet (counting from the outside) is about twice the length of the
others.
Habitat. Libreville, at the mouth of the Gaboon River, in two surface gatherings-
one being collected near the highest point reached.
Figure 47 shows the fifth feet of an immature female from the same locality. Only
three female specimens were obtained, which were all immature.
The Poiitella here described seems to be nearly identical with PontelUna mediterranean
Claus, except that Claus's specimens were larger — 4 mm. There is also a difference in
the number of jomts that precede the three swollen ones of the right male antenna :
Claus describes the three swollen joints as "vom dreizehnten bis funfzehnten Gliede,"
but in the ' Buccaneer ' specimens it is the sixth to the eighth joints that are swoUen.
Moreover, there is some difference in the armature of the prehensile part of the right fifth
foot ; in the ' Buccaneer ' specimens the " eight large and numerous small boat -like
knobs " described by Claus are wanting. But as these differences are comparatively
unimportant, and may be due to local causes, there appears to be no suflicient reason
to consider the ' Buccaneer ' specimens distinct from Pontella mediterranea, Claus,
except as a local variety.
Genus Pontellopsis, Brady.
{Pontellopsis, Brady, ' Challenger ' Copepoda, p. 85, 1883.)
? Monops, Lubbock, 1853.
Pontellopsis villosa, Brady. (PL VI. figs. 29-34.)
Pontellopsis villosa, Brady, op. cit. p. 86, pi. xxxiv. figs. 10-13, pi. xxxv. figs. 14-20.
Male. Length 1*85 mm. Right anterior antenna somewhat like that of Pontella
plumosa, Dana, but differing in the armature and in the number and proportional length
of the joints (fig. 34). The left anterior antenna, the posterior antennae, mouth-organs,
and swimming-feet are similar to those of the female (see also pi. xxxv. figs. 14-20,
88 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
of the ' Challenger ' Copepoda). The annexed foi'mu]a shows the proportional lengths of
the joints of the left anterior antenna, which is 18-jointed : —
5.7.6.7.4.4.4.4.3.6.7.8.9.G.(3.7.7.7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S i) lU 11 12 13 14 15 1(5 17 1«-
The fifth pair of feet are nearly like those of Fontella iilumosa ; the most obvious
difference between them is in the size and proportional length of the joints. Abdomen
stout, short, and composed of five segments ; the first is rather longer than the combined
length of the next two ; the second, third, foiirth, and fifth segments are nearly equal
in length. Caudal stylets about equal in length to the three preceding abdominal
segments.
Fontellopsis villosa was obtained in 21 tow-nettings from various parts of the area
traversed by the ' Buccaneer,' between lat. 5° 58' N., long. r4' 10" W., and lat. 6° 9' 8" S.,
long. 11° 10' 4" E., all of which, except one from 10 fathoms, were surface-gatherings.
The number of day and night collections are as follows : —
f 9 day collections.
1
r 20 surface 1 11 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 21 < f 1 1 11 f
L 1 under-surface (10 fathoms) < ^
^ l 0 „ ditto.
The genus and species were described by Dr. Brady from female specimens, of which
only three were obtained. In the ' Buccaneer ' collections a considerable number
of specimens were observed, but comparatively few of them were females, and none of
them reached the dimensions of those described in the 'Challenger' Copepoda; the
females also wanted the peculiar lateral abdominal apijendage possessed by the
'Challenger' specimens; otherwise, however, the 'Buccaneer' specimens (females)
agree in every respect with those described and figured in the ' Challenger ' Report.
The last three thoracic segments of all the 'Buccaneer' specimens possess a brownish
coloured mark of an irregular outline on each side of the median dorsal line, as shown
in figure 29. The abdomen in the females is also commonly distorted, and the first
segment is furnished with two small protuberances ; the form and size of the caudal
stylets are also more or less unequal.
Dr. Giesbrecht * considers Mouojjs, Lubbock, to be synonymous with Fontellopsis,
Brady, and as Monops is prior to the other he substitutes it for Fontellopsis.
Genus Pontellina, Dana, 1852.
Pontella, Brady (in part.)^ Eeport on the ' Challeugcr' Copepoda, 1883.
Pontellina, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Pelagische Copepoden), 1892.
Pontellina plumata, Dana.
1852. Pontellina plumata, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Esped. p. 1135, pi. Ixxix. figs. \Oa-d.
* ' Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Pelagische Copepoden),' p. 486.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. bl)
1852. Pon fella turgida, ^, Daua, loc. cit. p. 1136, pi. kxix. figs. 11 a, b, figs. 12 a, b.
1883. Pontella plvmata, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 92, pi. xxxvii. figs. 1-11.
Habitat. Station 3, 25 fathoms, Janviary 2iul (day collection). Station 9, 25 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 10, 20, 30, 200, and
360 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections). Station 23, 10 and 185 fathoms, February
5th (day collection). Lat. 8° 36' 8" S., long. 12' 57' E., surface, February 13th (day
collection), &c.
Fontellina plnmuta occurred in 67 tow-nettings, 39 of which were surface and 28
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface gatherings ranged from 2^ to 360 fathoms ;
16 of the surface and 21 of the under-surface were day collections, while 23 surface and
7 under-surface were night collections, as shown by the annexed formula : —
r 10 day collections.
n. H- . J^'-^ ^^^^-f^^*^ 1 23 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 67 < >- »
L28 under-surface (21 f^ay ditto.
1 7 night ditto.
This species was abundant in the ' Buccaneer ' collection, l)oth sexes being frequent.
Its distribution was co-extensive with the area examined.
Family CYCLOPID.E.
Genus Oithona, Baird.
Oithona, Baird, Zoologist, 1843.
OiTHONA Challengerii, Brady.
1883. Oithona ChaUengerii, Brady, Ecport Cliall. Copep. p. 97, pi. xl. figs. 1-10.
Huhitut. Station 2, 5 ftithoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Station 18, surface, February 3rd (day collection). Station
23, surface, February 5th (day collection). Lat. 5" 53' S., long. 11' 31' 1" E., surface,
February 18th (night collection), &c.
0. ChallemjerU seemed to be distributed all over the area examined ; in some tow-
nettings it was rather rare, but in others frequent. Considerable care was necessary in
diagnosing the species, owing to the close resemblance between it and others of the
same genus, and to their being so long immersed in spirit, which rendered it very
di£Bcult to make out the number of joints in the antennae.
Oithona plumipera, Dana.
1852. Oithona plumiftru, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Expcd. p. 1100, pi. 76.
Ilaliitat. Lat. 4 31' 6" K., long. 6 4'4" W., 25 fathoms, January lltli (day collection),
lat. 3' 58' N., long. 3 42' W., 50 fathoms, January 13th (day collection). Lat. 2 22' 2" S.,
long. T 45' E., 20 fathoms, February 3rd (day collection). Station 21, surface, February
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 12
90 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
4tli (day collection). Station 22, 20 fathoms, February 4tli (day collection). Station
24, surface, February 6th (day collection). Lat. 7 ' 38' S., long. 12' 3' 3" E., surface,
February 9th (night collection).
This Oilhona has long densely plumose setjB of a persistent purplish colour, which are
sufllciently conspicuous to enable the species to he readily distinguished. Oithona
plumifera, though frequent in the tow-nettings in which it was observed, appeared to be
somewhat rare generally, as the seven collections noticed above were the only ones in
which it was obtained.
Oithona minuta, n. sp. (PL IX. figs. 14-25.)
Length, female "64 mm., male -5 mm. Body moderately stout, ovate. Anterior
antennee not reaching to the end of the thorax : in the female composed of nine distinct
joints; the basal joint, which forms about a third part of the whole length of the
antenna, is indistinctly divided into seven unequal portions by very faint lines that do
not appear to be true joints. If these indistinct articulations be included the female
antennfB will consist of fifteen joints, the proportional lengths of which are nearly as
shown in the formula : —
(32 . 4 . 4 . 13 . 4 . 4 . 4) . 14 ■ 24 . 34 ■ 10 ■ 16 . 6 . 12 . 11
(1 .2.3. 4 .5.0.7). 8 . 0 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14Tl5"
The figures in parentheses refer to the indistinct pseudo-articulations observed in the
elongate basal joint. Male antennae 11-jointcd, hinged between the ninth and tenth
joints (fig. 16). Posterior antennse nearly as in Oithona spinlrostrls, Glaus (fig. 17) The
principal branch of the mandible-palp is armed with two stout, curved, claw-like apical
appendages bearing minute marginal spines ; the accessory branch is 4-jointed and
furnished with several long plumose setoe (fig. 19). The biting part has on one side a
short, stout, submarginal tooth, and on the other side a spiniform seta at the apical
angle fully twice the length of the apical teeth (fig. 18). Anterior and posterior
foot-jaws nearly as in Oithona Challengerli or Oithona sjmiirostris, as are also the
swimming-feet. The feet of the fifth pair in the female are bisetose, with moderately
long plumose setse ; those of the male very minute, with two very small setae. Abdomen
of the female 4-, of the male 5-jointed ; stylets as long as the last abdominal segment ;
the last abdominal segment and stylets in the male are a third shorter than in
the female, the tail-seta? in the male arc also much shorter than in the female
(figs. 24, 25).
This minute but distinct Oithona was obtained in a tow-net gathering collected at
Bananah Creek, Congo River, February 7th ; the sp. gr. of the water was only 1-00870.
In two tow-net gatherings from the seaward portion of Loanda Harbour, February 15th,
surface-temperature of the water at noon 79"-2 F. : the Loanda Harbour tow-net
gatherings were collected during the afternoon. Oithona minuta was moderately common
in these last two gatherings, and many of the females carried ovisacs.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 91
OiTHONA SETiGERA, Dana.
1852. Oiihona setigera, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1101, pi. ~G.
Ilabitat. In tow-net gatherings from 50 fathoms, lat. 3 58' N., long. 3 42' W.
(temperature 61°' 15 P., sp. gr. 1-02531), collected between 8 a.m. and 1 p.m., January
13th ; and from 3G0 fathoms, lat. 1 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E. (temperature about
43"^ P.), collected January 22nd. Oiihona setigera was also obtained in a few other
gatherings, but was much less frequent than Oithona Challengerii.
Subfamily Longipediinjj;, Boeck.
Genus LoNGiPEDiA, Claus (1863).
LONGIPEDIA MINOR, T. & A. Scott. (PI. XII. flgS. 10-13.)
1882. Longipedia coronata, Giesbrccht, Die freileb. Copepodeu dcr Kieler Folircle, p. 99, pis. i., iv., xii.
1893. Longipedia coronuta, var. vii/ior, T. & A. Scot, Anu. Scott. Nat. Hist. vol. ii. pt. 2, p. 93.
1893. Longipedia coronata, var. in'inor, T. Scott, xi. Aim. Rept. Fishery Board for Scotland, pt. iii.
p. 200, pi. ii. figs. 1 1-20.
Habitat. Lat. 1 55' 5" N., long. 5 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms, tow-net gathering, collected
January 22nd. Luanda Harbour, in three surface tow-net collections, Pebruary 15th.
Pour or five specimens in all were obtained ; they differed considerably from Longijjedia
coronata as described by Drs. Claus and Brady.
Genus Microsetella, Brady & P^obertson (1873).
Microsetella, Brady & Eobertson, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. scr. 4, vol. xii. p. 130 (1873).
Ectinosoma, Brady (in part), Mon. Brit. Copepoda, vol. ii. p. 13; id. Report on tlie ' Cliallenger '
Copepoda, p. 100 (1883).
Microsetella atlantica, Brady & Robertson.
1873. Microsetella atlantica, Brady & Robertson, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. xii. p. 130,
pi. ix. tigs. 11-lG.
1880. Ectinosoma atlanticum, Brady, Mon. Brit. Copep. viii. p. 13, pi. xxxviii. figs. 11-19.
1883. Ectinosoma atlunticum, id. Report Cliall. Copep. p. 100, pi. iv. figs. 10-14.
Habitat. Lat. T 33' N., long. 15' 18' W., surface, January 2nd (night collection). Lat.
3° 58' N., long. 3 42' W., 50 fathoms, January 13th (day collection). Lat. 1 55' 5" N.,
long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection). Lat. 6' 47' 5" S., long.
11' 30' 6" E., surface, Pebruary 8th (night collection), &c.
Microsetella atlantica was observed in 40 tow-nettings, 19 of which were surface and
21 undcr-surface gatherings; 4 of the surface and 15 of the under-surface gatherings were
day collections, Avhile 15 of the surface and 6 under-surface were night collections, as
shown by the annexed formula : —
r 4 day collections.
{10 surface { ik • i j. i-j-i
1 15 night ditto.
21 under-surface 1 15 day ditto
t 6 night ditto.
12*
92 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
The under-surfoce tow-nettings included eighteen gatherings from 2i to 50 fathoms,
and one at 185, 235, and 460 fathoms. This species appeared to be distributed all over
the area examined, and was comparatively frequent m some of the gatherings ; females
with ovisacs were not uncommon.
Canthocamptus rosens, Dana, probably belongs to this species. Dana's description
(so far as it goes) and figure agree with Microsetella atlantica, but the descrij)tion is
too meao-re to admit of a satisfactory comparison. There is a difference between the
two as reo-ards size and colour, but such differences are not of much value unless allied
with structural differences.
Genus Ectinosoma, Boeck.
Ectinosoma, Boeck, Oversigt Norges Copepodei-, ISQi.
Ectinosoma, Brady (in part), Mon. Brit. Copep. vol. ii. p. 10.
Ectinosoma Chrystalii, n. sp. (Pi. IX. figs. 26-35.)
Length 1 mm. Body robust ; anterior antennse short, stout, furnished with numerous
long setfe; 6-jointed, the third joint is somewhat longer than either the preceding or
following ; the last is smaller than the others and about two-thirds the length of the
penultimate joint, truncate at the apex, and furnished with three long apical sctse. The
long middle joint of the posterior foot-jaw is setose on the ujiper edge, and a long plumose
seta that extends beyond the apex of the foot-jaw springs from the upper distal angle of
the first joint ; last joint short, provided with three seta3 (fig. 34). The second basal
joints of the first pair of swimming-feet are furnished interiorly with a setose spine that
extends nearly to the middle of the second joint of the inuer branches ; the outer
branches, which are comparatively short, reach only to the end of the second joint of the
inner branches, and the spines on the exterior edge are elongate and sharp-pointed, other-
wise the first pair closely resemble those of Ectinosoma spinipes. The second basal joint of
the fourth pair is somewhat produced and armed exteriorly with an elongate setose
spine ; the branches of tlie fourth pair are nearly of equal length, and armed similar to
the first pair, except that the exterior marginal spines of the outer branches are not
elongate nor setose. Eifth pair nearly as in Ectinosoma melaniceps, Boeck. Caudal
stylets about equal in length to the last abdominal segment; the inner of the two
principal caudal sctoe considerably longer than the other.
Sahitat. Station 3 (lat. T 1' 1" N., long. 15' 54' W.), 25 fathoms, collected between
9 A.M. and 5.30 p.m., January 2ud.
Several specimens, all females, were obtained in this gathering. The species is
named after Professor Chrystal, who designed a tow^-net used in collecting some of the
material from which the Copepoda described in this Report were obtained.
Genus Bradya, Boeck, 1872.
Bradya, Boeck, Nye Stegter og Arter af Saltvands-Copepoder, 1872.
Bradya brevicornis, sp. n. (PI. IX. figs. 36-43.)
Length 88 mm. Somewhat similar in form to Bradya typica, Boeck. Anterior
FEOM THE GULF OF GUI^'EA. 93
antennce short, stout, upper edge fringed witli long sctEe, 7-jointed, the second joint
shorter than, and having the upper distal angle produced so as to extend considerably
over, the next joint; the fourth joint is much shorter than either the preceding or
following joints ; the last joint is very small and hears two long terminal setae. In the
2-jointed secondary branches of the posterior antennse the distal joint is about twice
the length of the proximal one (fig. 38). The anterior foot-jaws are short and stout. The
small terminal joint of the posterior foot-jaws boars two long, stout, blunt-pointed spuaes,
ciliate on both edges, and a long, slender seta ; a long, plain seta springs from the end
of the first joint (fig. 10). The first four pairs of swimming-feet are nearly as in Bradya
typica ; the fifth pair are longer than broad, the apex of the second joint is obliquely
truncate and furnished with two setae, while the inner distal angle terminates in a stout
conical spine. Caudal stylets about once and a half the length of the last abdominal
segment. The imicr of the two principal tail-sette is about twice the length of the other ;
a small spiniform seta sjjrings from the outer margin and near the distal end of
each stylet.
Habitat. In a surface tow-net gathering from a lagoon, Sao Thome Island, collected
January 21st.
Subfamily T a c H i d 1 1 n .e, Boeck.
Genus Euterpe, Claus.
'Euterpe, Clausj Die freilebenden Copepoden, 1803 ; Brady, Monog. Bi'it. Copep. 1880.
Euterpe gracilis, Claus, var. armata, n. var. (PL XII. figs. 11-23.)
Length '9 mm. Body as in Euterpe gracilis, but with the rostrum more pyramidal,
slightly curved. Anterior antennse 7-jointed, shorter than the first body-segment. The
proportional lengths of the joints as in the formula : —
5. 10. 8. 9. 6. 5. 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7'
The fourth joint bears one and the last joint two slender sensory hairs at their distal
end. The last three joints also bear a number of long plain sette. Posterior antennne
4-jointed, the first two short, the third and fourth longer, subequal ; a small 1-joiuted
secondary branch springs from near the end of the second joint. The mouth-organs and
s-wimming-f eet are similar to those of JEtiterpe gracilis, but with the following differences : —
The second joint of the inner branches of the first pair of swimming-feet bears a mode-
rately long and stout setiferous terminal spine, which is curved outwards ; near the middle
of the same joint is a curved transverse row of seta) extending from the outer margin to
fully halfway across the joint. The extremity of the outer branches of the second pair is
furnished with a long spine, finely serrate on the outer edge, a shorter setiferous spine,
a long slender plumose seta, and several small setose spines ; the inner branches also bear
a row of small spines at their extremities in addition to the jjluuiose hairs. The inner
branches of the third and fourth pairs are each armed with a long, stout, strongly seti-
94 MR. T. SCOTT OiS' ENTOMOSTEACA
ferous, and straiglit terminal spine, iu addition to several smaller spines and a slender
plumose seta. The extremity of the outer branches bears a long curved spine, serrate
on the outer edge, two smaller dagger-like spines, and a plumose hair ; these smaller
spines and the spines at the outer distal angles of the first and second joints are strongly
serrate on both margins. A row of spinous setae extends obliquely across the lower
middle portion of the last joint of the inner branches of the fourth pair as well as round
the extremity of the joint. The fifth pair as in Euterjie gracilis, but with only one short
and three long dagger-like terminal spines. A moderately long seta springs from the
external margin and near the base of each branch, and a row of small spines extends
obliquely from the marginal seta to fully halfway across the segment ; moreover, the
extremity and inner margin of each branch are fringed wdth short spinous setee. Ovisac
single, large, containing numerous ova.
Habitat. Station 9, 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Off Accra, svirface, 1 day
and 1 night collection ; 3 fathoms, 1 day and 1 night collection, January 16tb. Lagoon,
Sao Thome Island, surface, January 27th (night collection). Station 23, 235 fathoms,
Eebruary 5th (day collection). Loanda Harbour, surface, February 15th (day collection).
This species was obtained in 29 tow-nettings, 10 of which were surface and 13 under-
surface gatherings ; 4 of the surface gatherings were collected during the day and 12
during the night, while 10 of the u nder-surface were collected during the day and 3
during the night, as shown by the annexed formula : —
r 4 day collections,
r 16 surface 1 12 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 29 < r -ir^ -i ^•^.i.
1 13 under-surface J ^^ ^'^^ ^^<^^«-
I 3 night ditto.
The under-surface gatherings were from depths ranging from 2i to 235 fathoms.
The form here described, though agreeing generally with Miter;pe gracilis, differs in
several important points, as, for instance, in the proportional length of the joints of the
anterior antennae, in the inner branches of the third and fourth pairs of swimming-feet
being furnished with prominent, strongly setiferous, terminal spines, and in the fifth pair
j)ossessing four instead of five terminal spines. These difi'erenccs, which are suflQciently
characteristic to allow of the variety being readily distinguished, may ultimately be
considered of specific value ; meanwhile, however, I prefer to consider the ' Buccaneer '
specimens as constituting a variety of Eutei^e gracilis.
Subfamily AmymoniN-E, Boeck.
Genus Amymone, Glaus.
Anu/monc, Die frcilebeudeu Copepocleu, 1863; Brady, Monog. Brit. Coj^ep. 1880.
Amymone Andrewi, u. sp. (PL XI. figs. 44-47 ; PI. X. fig. 1.)
Length "55 mm. Cephalothorax somewhat similar in form to Ariiymone sphcBrica, Claus,
except that the last thoracic segment is more produced and does not bear any spine-like
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 95
processes. Anterior anteunfe not longer than the first thoracic segment, 8-jointed, the
proportional lengths as follows : —
24 . 24 ■ 18 . 13 . 6 . 5 . 3 . 8
1 2 3 4567 8'
The fourth joint bears a long sensory hair at its distal end, and two similar but rather
small hairs spring from the extremity of the last joint. Posterior antennjB slender,
3-jointed, the second and third joints subequal, the last terminating in one long and one
short, stout, claw-like seta ; the first joint bears at its distal end a small 1-jolnted secondary
branch possessing four apical setaj. The terminal joint of the first foot-jaws is slender,
and furnished with several long plumose hairs and at the extremity with three stout spini-
form setse. A stout sctiferous process springs from the end of the second last joint and
reaches to the end of the spiniform sette just described. Second foot-jaws 2-jointed, long,
and powerful. The hands possess strong curved terminal claws, bearing below the middle
portion one long and one short spinous seta. The Ijasal part of the hands is produced out-
ward into a stout, curved, spiniform process ; the hollow formed by this spiniform process
bears a peculiar dilated appendage, furnished with several small spine-like tubercles on
its outer surface. The inner margin of the hand is doubly and finely serrate. The
integument is closely beset with minute tubercles, much more prominent and distinct
than those of A. sphcerica.
Habitat. Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface, January 27th (night collection). Specific
gravity of the water 1"0237 to 1'0255. One specimen only of this curious species was
obtained : I was able to prepare the foregoing diescription without dissecting it.
The posterior foot-jaws in this species form powerfal gL'asping-organs. Thej)roduced
base of the hand acting as a sort of thumb and the terminal claw as a finger, with
the dilated appendage in the hollow at the base of the hand acting as an interlocking
arrangement, form together an elaborate and efficient instrument for grasping purposes,
such as I have not observed in any other described species. This curious and interesting
genus is represented in various and widely distant localities. It has been observed in
various parts of the North Sea, as at Heligoland, Christiania, and several places on the
English and Scotch coasts ; at Messina, Naples, and other localities on the Mediterranean
coast ( Ckms) ; in the Gulf of Mexico (Herrick) ; and on the "West Coast of Africa, as now
recorded.
The species is named after my son Andrew Scott, who has assisted me so well with the
preparation of this Eeport, and who discovered the only specimen of this genus obtained
in the ' Buccaneer ' tow-nettinsrs.
r>-
Subfamily Stenheliin.e, Brady (1880).
Genus Stenhblia, Bocck (1864).
Stenhelia, Boeck, Oversigt Norges Copepoder, 1864.
Stenhelia accraensis, n. sp. (PI. X. figs. 2-12.)
Length -85 mm. Body moderately robust ; first cephalothoracic segment considerably
96 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
lono-er than the entire lenijth of the other four ; rostrum prominent. Anterior antennae
short and stout, 9-jointed ; the upper distal angle of the fourth joint is produced forward
over the next, while the terminal joint is ahout as long as the total length of the pre-
ceding four ; the relative lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the formula : —
10. 8.5. 3. 2.3. 2.2. 9
1 2345678 9'
Mandibles and maxillae nearly as in Stenlielia hispida. Foot-jaws nearly as in
Stenlielia ima. The swimming-feet are also nearly as in the last-named species, except
that the proportional lengths of the joints are somewhat ditfercnt; the first joint of
the inner branches of the first pair is not longer than the outer branches and not
much longer than the combined length of the second and third joints. The inner
branches of the fourth pair are somewhat longer than the outer branches. The fifth pair
closely resemble those of Stenlielia ima (fig. 11). Caudal stylets somewhat widely
apart, about equal in length to the last abdominal segment, and furnished with four
apical seta3 (fig. 12).
Habitat. Accra, in a shore gathering, collected January 16th,
Subfamily CANTHOCAMPTiNyE, Brady (1880) .
Monograph of the British Copepoda, vol. ii. p. 47.
Genus Laophonte, Philippi (1810).
Laophonte, Philippi, Archiv fiir Naturgeschichte, 1840.
Cleta, Claus, Die freilebendeu Copepoden, 1863.
Asellopsis, B. & R., Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xii. 1873.
Laophonte serrata (Claus). (PI. XII. figs. 21-28.)
1863. Glefa serrata, Claus, loc. cit. p. 123, t. xv. figs. 13-20.
1880. Laophonte serrata, Brady, op. cit. vol. ii. p. 71, pi. Ixxii. figs. 1-14.
RaUtat. Accra, in a shore gathering, collected January 16th. This, though ajoparently
widely distributed, is nevertheless a rare species. It has been obtained in a few British
localities, but always sparingly.
The strong conical tooth -like process on the second joint of the anterior antennae and
the serrated margin of the third joint (fig. 25) are well-marked characters of the species.
Laophonte longipes, n. sp. (PI. X. figs. 13-23.)
Length '6 mm. Body elongate ; anterior antennae 7-jointed ; the first thi'ee joints are
together about equal to twice the entire length of the other four, and the last is about
equal to the combined length of the two preceding joints. The relative lengths of the
joints are nearly as follows : —
6.7.7.2.2.2.4
12 3 4 5 6 7'
FROM THE GULF OF GUTXEA. 97
The upper distal portion of the fourth joint is produced and forms the base of a sensory
filament and one or two setae. The secondary branch of the posterior antennae is very
short and provided with four setae — three terminal and one subterminal. Mouth-organs
nearly as in Laophonte similis, Claus. The outer branches of the first pair of swimming-
feet 2-joiuted, not reaching to the middle of the inner branches ; the first joint is about
two-thirds the length of the second. The inner branches of the foui'th pair, which reach
nearly to the end of the second joint of the outer branches, have the first joint fully half
as long as the second, but the first and second joints of the outer branches are about equal
in length. Fifth pair nearly as in Laophonte curticauda. Caudal stylets somewhat
divergent ; length about tln-ee times the breadth ; principal tail-setae elongate, two-thirds
the length of the animal.
Mahitat. In a shore gathering from Sao Thome Island, collected January 25th at
low water ; and in a tow-net gathering from 20 fatlioms off Stlo Thome, collected
January 23rd.
Laophonte rxoM^aEA, n. sp. (PI. X. figs. 21-30.)
Length 'fG mm. (l-oith of an inch). Body elongate, slender. Anterior antennae
7-jointed, nearly as in Laophonte hrecicornis ; tlie annexed formula shows the pro-
portional lengths of the joints : —
G. 7. 7. 2. 2. 3. 4
12 3 4 5 6 7'
The posterior antennae and mouth-organs are also nearly as in Laophonte brevicornis,
except that the posterior foot-ja^ys have the second joint finely ciliate on the inner edo-e
and furnished with a small seta near the middle of the exterior edge. Inner branches of
first swimming-feet small, 2-jointed ; inner branches of fourth pair very short, scarcely
longer than the first joint of the outer branches, 2-jointed ; the first joint is very small, and
the apex of the second is provided with one stout terminal and two subterminal setae.
The outer branches are armed with a stout apical spine (fig. 28). Eeet of the fifth pair
nearly as in Laopjhoute curticauda, Eoeck ; outer margin and surface of basal joints
ciliate. Caudal stylets somewhat divergent ; their breadth is nearly equal to half the
length, and each is provided with two stout apical setae, the inner one being nearly double
the length of the other.
Hahitat. Shore, Sao Thome Island, in the same gathering as the last.
Laophonte brevicornis, n. sp. (PI. X figs. 31-37.)
Length -58 mm. Body slender. Anterior antenna^. G-jointed, the fourth and fifth joints
very short; the upper portion of the fourth is produced so as to extend to near the
extremity of the following joint and form the base of a moderately stout sensory filament.
The relative lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the annexed formula : —
10 . 7 . 7 . 2 . 2 . 8
1 2 3 4 .5 «"
Second joint of posterior foot-jaws with a row of very fine cilia on the upper margin;
SECOND SEKIES.^ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 13
98 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
both the two joints and the terminal claws appear to be otherwise destitute of spines or setas.
Outer branches of first pair of swimming-feet 2-jointed, fully half the length of the first
joint of the inner branches, the joints subequal ; the length of the first joint of the
inner branch is equal to nearly four times its breadth ; the terminal claw is stout, and
fully two-tliirds the length of the first joint and nearly twice and a half the length of
the second (fig. 34). The inner branches of the fourth pair, which are scarcely equal in
length to the first joint of the outer branches, are composed of two nearly equal joints
— the first being the smaller of the two and possessing a moderately long seta on its inner
edge; the last joint is furnished with two coarsely plumose terminal setae and a similar
seta on the inner and outer margin ; the joints of the 3-jointed outer branches are subequal
in length, but the middle one is the shortest of the three (fig. 35). The second joint of the
fifth pair, which is considera1)ly smaller than the basal joint, is broader at the distal than
the proximal end, and furnished with six setae round the exteriorly oblique apex ; the
basal joint is somewhat truncate at the apex and provided with three plain apical setse
and two coarsely plumose setae on the lower portion of the inner margin (fig. 36). Caudal
stylets about equal in length to the last abdominal segment and comparatively wide apart.
Each stylet is furnished with one long and stout and a few small setae ; the length of the
principal seta is equal to about once and a half the combined length of the stylet and
last abdominal segment, and has the extremity curved outwards (fig. 34).
JIahilat. In a shore gatliering at Accra, collected January IGth.
Genus Cletodes, Brady (1872).
Cktodes, Brady, Nat. Hist. Traus. Northumb. & Durham, 1872.
Lilljeborffia, Clans, Die Copeijodcii-Fauna von Nizza, 1866.
Orthopsi/lliis, Brady & Robertson, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Ilist. vol. xii. 1873.
Cletodes linearis (Glaus). (PL XII. figs. 29-32.)
1866. Lilljeborffia linearis, Claus, Die Copepoden-Fauna von Nizza, p. 22, t. ii. figs. 1-8.
1873. Orthopsijlhs linearis, B. & R., Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xii. p. 138.
1880. Cletodes linearis, Brady, Brit. Copep. vol. ii. p. 95, pi. Ixsx. figs. 1-14.
Habitat. Accra, in a shore gathering, collected January IGth. Loanda Harbour, in a
surface tow-net gathering, collected February 13th.
This species, though numerically scarce, appears to have an extensive distribution.
In 'British Co]:)epoda' Professor Brady records it from Scilly Islands, also from Newry
and Roundstone, Ireland, and Glaus has recorded it from Nice.
Subfamily HARPACTiciNyE, Boeck (in part).
Oversigt Norges Copepoder, 1864.
Genus Dacttlopus, Glaus (18G3).
Dactylopus, Clans, Die t'reilebenden Copepodeu, 1863.
Dactylopus, Brady, British Copepoda, 1880.
niOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 99
Dactylopus latipes, n. sp. (PL X. figs. 38-43.)
Length 1-25 mm. (l-20th of an inch). Body moderately robust. Fii'st segment of the
cephalothorax once and a half the entire length of the other fom* segments; rostrum
sliglitly curved, stout, of moderate length. Anterior autennte short, stout, 9-jointed ;
first joint large, the fourth provided with a long sensory filament ; the proportional lengths
of the joints nearly as in the formula : —
^5 . 8 . 7 . e . ^ . A . 2 . l . S
1 2 3 4 o tj 7 S i)'
Second foot-jaws short and stout ; a plumose seta springs from near the inner distal
angle of the first joint ; the inner margin of the second joint is ciliate, and a small seta
springs from the side and near the middle of the same joint (fig. 10) ; the terminal claw
is provided Avith a slender seta near the base. Pirst pair of swimming-feet nearly as in
Dactylopus tishoides, Clans. The fifth pair consists of large foliaceous plates jmrtly
overlapping each other and forming, apparently, a kind of ovigerous pouch for the pro-
tection of the ova (fig. 42 ; see also fig. 38). Abdominal segments fringed with small
teeth ; their general surface is also more or less hispid. Caudal stylets about equal in
length to the last abdominal segment and rather longer than broad. The inner of
the two principal tail-setai is equal to the entire length of the abdomen and stylets.
Hahitut. Accra, in a shore gatliering with Dacfijloims prophiquus, Lauphonte serrata,
Stenhella, &c., collected January 16th.
Dactylopus propinqui's, n. sp. (PI. X. figs. 44-52; PL XI. figs. 1-3.)
Female. Length '5 mm. (l-50tli of an inch). Body moderately stout. Anterior
antennae short and stout, 6-jointed ; the upper portion is produced and forms the base of
a long sensory filament. The annexed formula shows the proportional lengths of the
joints : —
8 . 5 . 8 . 2 . 4 . r,
12 3 4 5 0
Posterior antennae nearly as in Dactylopus tishoides, Claus (PL X. fig. 47). The first joint
of the posterior foot-jaws bears two small spinous seta; on the inner margin and another
at the inner distal angle ; a row of small spinous setae extends diagonally from near the
outer edge at the proximal end to the upj)er edge near the distal end of the second joint ;
the terminal claw is stout and provided wdth a small seta on its inner aspect. The outer
branches of the first swimming-feet consist of three nearly equal joints — the middle one
being somewhat shorter than the first or third, the last two joints of the inner branches
very short and armed with one stout terminal claAV and a long seta ; the exterior margin
of both the last two joints bears several small spiuiform teeth (fig. 49). The inner
branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs are somewhat shorter than those of
Dactylopus Stromii (Baird), but otherwise they resemble very closely the same swimming-
feet of that species. The second joint in the fifth pair, which does not extend much
beyond the apex of the basal joint, is subquadrangular in outline and furnished with five
13*
100 Mil. T. SCOTT OX ENTOMOSTRACA
long sette on its outer nearly straight marg-in, and another on the inner lateral margin;
the hroadly triangular portion oi' the basal joint hears one apical and two suhapical
stout plain seta?, and two slender setse spring from the anterior margin (fig. 50). Caudal
stylets very short, fringed with long slender serrse ; the longer of the tAvo principal terminal
setae is fully twice the length of the abdomen. Ovisacs two.
Habitat. Accra, in a shore gathering collected January 16th. Off Sao Thome
Island, in a tow-net gathering from 20 fathoms, collected January 23rd, and in a
tow-net gathering from a lagoon by the shore of Sao Thome Island, collected
January 23rd.
A form, which is probably the male of the Dactylopus now described, occurs in the
same gatherings with it. The only important difference is in the anterior antennae,
which are somewhat longer and 8-joiuted ; they are hinged between the fifth and sixth
joints. But though the anterior auteuuse of the male usuallj^ consist of the same
number of joints as in the female, and frequently of a fewer number, it occasionally
happens that they are composed of more joints — as, for instance, in I/i/ojysi/Ilns coriaceus
(Brady and Bobertson *) and Ilyopsi/llns ajjiiiis, described in this Report, in both of
which the male antennai consist of a greater number of joints than those of the female.
The first swimming-feet of the male of Dactylopus projjinquus are similar to those of
the female already described ; the second pair resemble those of the male of Dactylopus
Stroma (Baird). The first abdominal segment is provided with a pair of trispinose
appendages as shown in PL XL fig. 3 (see also PI. X. fig. 41).
Genus Thalestris, Claus.
Thalestris, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepodeu, p. 128 (1863).
Thalestris forpicula, Claus. (PI. XII. figs. 33-11.)
1863. Tlialeslris forjicula, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden, p. 131, pi. xvii. figs. 7-11.
Habitat. In a shore gathering from Accra, collected January 16th.
The length ("5 mm.) of the ' Buccaneer ' specimen is less than that stated by Claus,
which is 'S mm. The anterior antennae are 8-jointed ; the relative lengths of the joints
being nearly as shown by the annexed formula : —
9.8.6.5.4.4.3.4
12 3 4 5 6 7 8'
The secondary branch of postei'ior antennae 2-joiuted. First pair of swimming-feet
elongate, the inner branches considerably longer than the outer ; terminal claws short and
stout. Inner branches of the second, third, and fourth pairs shorter than the outer
branches : in the fourth pair the inner branches reach only to about the end of the second
joint of the outer branches, while the outer branches are long and slender, Avith a long
slender terminal sjiine, ciliate on the outer edge (fig. 39). Second joint of the fifth pair
* Brit. Copep. vol. ii. pi. Ixxxii. fig. 4.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 10]
elongate, larg-cr tlian the basal joint and furnished with six plain setae — two apical, two
suhapical, and two on tlui lower half of the outer margin (fig. 10). Caudal stylets very
short ; the basal part of the principal caudal setae is distinctly g-il)bous, as shown in
fig. 41. Clans also, op. cit., describes and figures this character of the tail-setae. He
obtained Thalestris fovficula at Messina.
Genus Ilyopsyllus, Brady & Eobertson.
IlyopsyUus, Brudy & llobcrtsou. Aim. & Mag. Nat. Hist. s. 4, vol. xii. p. 132 (1873).
Ilyopsyllus affinis, n. sp. (PI. XI. figs. 4-17.)
Length "5 mm. Body tumid, .similar in form to Ilijopsyllus coriaceus, B. & E,. ;
rostrum broadly triangular, furcate at the apex.
Anterior antenna? S-jointed in the female, 8-jointed in the male ; the produced upper
distal portion of the dilated liasal joint is more or less hispid and furnished with several
spiniform seta? ; a curved fold fringed with long stout serrse occurs near the distal end
of the base, and extends from the upper margin downwards about two-thirds the breadth
of the joint. In the female the three apical joints are of nearly equal length. The
proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the formula : —
Female : 20 . 10 . 8 . 7 . 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
llalc : 8 . 20 . 5 . t) . 7 . lU . 0 . .5
The third and fourth joints in the male are each provided with a long " olfactory "
appendage, as are also the female antennae, and these olfactory filaments appear to have a
small joint near the proximal end, as shown by the figs. 4 and 5 ; posterior antennte and
mandibles nearly as in Ilyopsijllus coriaceus. Eig. 10 represents what appear to be
the maxillae and oral aperture. Figs. 11 and 12 represent what appear to be the
anterior and posterior foot-jaws as observed in the dissections of the animal. The first
four pairs of swimming-feet resemble those of Ilyopsyllus coriaceus, except that the
middle joint of the outer branches of the first pair is somewhat longer than either the
first or third joints. Fifth pair small, simple, obliquely truncate at the apex, with the
lateral angles somcAvhat produced and bearing each a smtill spiniform seta, and a
similar seta springs from the distal half of the outer margin ; a transverse curved row
of small spines extends nearly across the basal part of each foot (lig. 15). Abdominal
segments fringed with stout cilia. Caudal stylets short, breadth about equal to the
length, each furnished with two very short set;© and a long one, which is slightly
spathulate at the base.
Habitat. In a shore lagoon at Sao Thome Island, among species of Conferva.
102 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Genus Harpacticus, Milne-Edwards (1838).
Harpacticus chelifer, ?var. (PI. XII. figs. 42-46.)
1776. Cyclops chelifer, Miiller, Zool. Dan. Prodr. 2413 ; Entomostraca, p. Hi, t. xix. figs. 1-3.
1850. Arpacticus, Baird, Brit. Entom. p. 212, t. xxix. figs. 2, 3, 3 a-g.
1863. Harpacticus, Clans, Die freilebendeu Copcpoden, p. 135, t. xix. figs. 12-19.
1880. Harpacticus, Brady, Brit. Copep. vol. ii. p. 146, pi. Ixv. figs. 1-15, pi. Ixiv. figs. 10, 11.
A form of Harjiacticus closely resembling Harpacticus chelifer was obtained in a
shore gathering collected at Accra, January 16th, and in a tow-net gathering from
185 fathoms at Station 23, collected February 5th.
The chief point of difference seems to be the absence of the curved spines or " claws "
on the inner distal margin of the last joint of the posterior foot-jaws ; the inner margin
of these foot-jaws is also not concave as in S. chelifer, but in all other respects the
' Buccaneer ' specimens closely resemble that species.
Genus Miracia, Dana.
Miracia, Dana, Proceed. Amer. Acad. Sci. 1849.
Miracia efferata, Dana.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, surface,
25 and 50 fathoms, Jahuary 10th (day collections). Station 14, 10 fatlioms, January
21st (night collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 10 to 360 fathoms,
January 22ud (day collections). Lat. G" 3' 3" S., long. 11° 7' 5" E., surface, Eebruary 8th
(day collection).
This Miracia was observed in 49 tow-nettings, 18 of which were surface and 31 under-
surface gatherings. The uuder-surface gatherings were from 3 to 360 fathoms, 8 of the
surface and 21 of the under-surface tow-nettings were day collections, while 10 surface
and 10 under-surface were night collections, as shown by the formula : —
f 8 day collections.
rl8 surface \ ^i^ • w ivi
m i.i.- ,n) ^10 nm'ht ditto.
Tow-nettings 49 < ^
tsi under-surface ( 21 day ditto.
1 10 night ditto.
It was of frequent occurrence in several of the gatherings, and many of the specimens
carried ovisacs.
MlKACIA MINOR, u. sp. (PL XI. figs. 18-30.)
Length -93 mm. General form as of Miracia efferata, but not half the size. Anterior
antennce 8-jointed, slender in the female ; the proportional lengths of the joints are as
follows : —
IS . 15 . 13 . lit . 14 . 20 . 11 . 15
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 103
The joints bear from, one to four setae each, except the last, which has one on the
upper and four on the lower side ; it has also three terminal sette. The seta wliich
springs from the upper distal angle of the third joint is longer than those on the other
joints except the last, and a long sensory filament springs from the upper distal angle
of the fourth joint. In the male antennae the first three joints are short, the third being
shorter than either of the other two ; the fourtli is dilated and longer than the
preceding three together ; the fittli is short ; the sixth long and slender ; the seventh
is very small ; the eishtli a little longer than the seventh and furnished with four
terminal seta} ; the male antenna} hinged between the fifth and sixth joints. The
following are the proportional lengths of the joints : —
10 . 9 . 4 . 24 . 9 . 11 . 2 . 5
1234 5 678
Posterior antenna} 4-jointed — the last joint as long as the preceding two together,
and ciliated along one of its margins. A small 1-jointed secondary appendage, furnished
with two stout terminal setaj and a few marginal cilia, springs from the end of the
second joint. Mouth-organs as in Mlracia efferata, except that the posterior foot-jaws are
3-jointcd and nearly alike in both sexes, but that of the male has a longer terminal claw ;
in neither, however, is the terminal claw so short as in Miracia efferata. The first pair
of swimming-feet has the inner branches scarcely so long as the outer ones ; the second
joint of the outer branches is furnished with a moderately long plumose hair on the inner
distal angle ; the inner margin is fringed with short stoixt settc, as are also the ends of
the first and second joints. The second pair in the female resembles the third and
fourth pairs, but are rather smaller. The inner branches of the second jiair in the male
are 2-jointed ; the last joint bears one short terminal spine, and one on the lower half of
the outer margin ; on the inner margin are two long plumose hairs. The third and fourth
pairs are similar in both sexes ; the inner branches being shorter than the outer ; all the
joints of botli branches are fringed with hairs on the external margin ; the inner distal
angle of the last joint bears a long, slender, non-plumose hair (or spine). The fifth feet
small, foliaceous, 2-jointed ; the proximal joint in the male is armed with two spinous setae ;
the distal bears one long setiferous spine and two short spines, also a small hair on the
inner aspect, as shown in the figure. In the female the proximal joint is armed with
one long setiferous spine and four small spinous setjie (one of which is very minute) ;
the distal joint is somewhat cylindrical in form, and is furnished with several setiferous
spines at the extremity. Abdomen in the male 5-, in the female i-jointed — the first
two joints being coaleseent in the female. The posterior margin of the last three
segments, in both sexes, fringed with small spinous seta}. Caudal stylets rather longer
than the last abdominal segment, each furnished with one moderately long setiferous
and two shorter spines, besides several spinous setae on the outer aspect near the middle
of the stylet. At the extremity are one long and stout and one short setiferous spine
and a number of spinous setee ; the long terminal setiferous spine is fully half as Ion"-
again as the stylet.
104 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
Hahitat. Station 23, 235 fathoms, February 5th (day collection).
Several speciniens, a few carrying ovisacs, vv'ere ohtainecl in this gathering, which
was the only one in which Miracla minor was observed. It differs from both Dana's
species, especially in the number and proportional lengths of the joints of the anterior
antennae.
Genus Machairopus, Brady.
Machairopus, Erady, Report on the ' Challenger' Coj^epoda, 1883.
Machairopus idyoides, Brady.
1883. Machairopus idyoides, Brady, Report ■ Cliallenger ' Copep. p. 101, pi. xli. figs. 1-12.
Habitat. The shore of Sao Thome Island, January 31st (day collection).
This collection, which contained a very small quantity of weed and sand, yielded a
number of Sarpacticidm, including two specimens of the Machairopus. The ' Challeuger '
specimens (" two or three only were found ") were from Betsy Cove, Kergueien Island.
The full and carefully figured details which accompany the description of this species
make its identification comparatively easy and certain.
Genus JEgisthus, Giesbrecht, 1891.
JEffisthus, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Pelagisehe Copepoden), p. 573 (1892).
Thaumatopsytlus * , Scott, MS. name, 1892.
Body slender, elongate, and with a more or less sharp-pointed rostrum. Anterior
antennfe slender, in the female about equal in length to the first body - segment,
6-jointed ; in the male the anterior anteunjB are longer, and consist of a greater number
of joints. Posterior antennae somewhat similar to those of Iliracia, 3-jointed, and with
a small 1-jointed secondary branch. Mandibles well develojjed, the broad biting apex
irregularly toothed ; mandible-palp (?) absent or very rudimentary. Posterior foot-jaws
5-jointed, the three apical joints very small; a long, stout, curved spine springs from the
inner distal angle of the second joint ;. in the male the posterior foot-jaws are smaller
than those of the female. Both branches of the first four pairs of swimming-feet
3-jointed and of nearly equal length ; in the first pair in the female the articulation
between the second and third joints is imperfect and indistinct. Fifth pair simple,
1-brauched, 1- (or indistinctly 2-) jointed in the female; distinctly 2-jointed in the male.
The tail-seta3 of the species for which the genus is instituted are extremely long, and
may or may not form a generic character. {Note. — ^Tliis description was written before I
saw Giesbrecht's worlc.)
jEgisthus longirostris, n. sp. (PI. XI. figs. 31-44)
Body elongate, slender, gradually tapering towards the posterior end ; forehead
produced into a long pointed rostrum. Caudal stylets short, each terminating in an
*
Oavpariis, ■wonderful ; ;f t>XAos, a flea.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 105
extremely long, slender, jointed, setiferous sjiine, bearing a plumose seta at its extremity
(fig. 31). Length, exclusive of caudal spines, 2-4 mm. ; Icngtli to the extremity of the
caudal spines 12-5 mm. (J an inch). Anterior antennae (female) slender, about equal in
length to the first cephalothoracic segment, 6-jointed, sparingly setiferous, penultimate
joint very short. The upper distal end of the first joint is produced to form a broadly
conical tooth provided with an apical seta. A long " olfactory " appendage springs from
the end of the third joint. The relative lengths of the joints are nearly as follows : —
10 ■ 12 ■ 13 . 8 . 1 . 3
1 2 3 4 5 6'
Anterior antennse of the male very long aud slender, fully twice the length of tliose
of the female, 7-jointed, penultimate joint extremely long ; the olfactory appendage that
springs from the distal half of the fourth joint and the principal apical seta are also very
long. The annexed formula shows the relative lengths of the joints : —
12 . 13 . 5 . 15 . 6 . 38 ■ 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ■
Both the male and female antenntB are geniculate between the first and second joints
(fig. 3i). Second and third joints of the posterior antennae elongate : secondary branch
very short, with two apical setae. Mandibles broad, with the truncate distal end
irregularly toothed and bearing a pectinate stout seta at the outer angle (fig. 36) ; no
trace of a palp was observed. The maxillae have a well-developed biting part aud a
small secondary appendage bearing three apical setae. Anterior foot-jaws small ; first
joint armed with two stout spines, setose on both edges, and a small spine and a seta ;
the very small terminal point bears three apical setae. The last three joints of the
second foot-jaws are very small and furnished with several long setae ; the inner distal
portion of the elongate second joint is produced and forms the base of a long, stout,
curved spine ; there is a small setiferous process on the inner margin of the proximal
end (fig. 39). The posterior foot-jaws in the male are somewhat similar to those of the
female, but smaller and less setiferous (fig. 40). The middle joint of the second, third,
and fourth pairs of swimming-feet shorter than the first or third ; the marginal spines
of the outer branches stout, dagger-shaped, and serrate on both margins ; terminal spines
elongate, falcate, serrate on the outer edge, the inner edge ciliate. Fifth pair of feet
simple, each foot armed with three long dagger-shaped spines on the outer margin and
two at the apex : both edges of these spines are serrate except near the base : there are
two plumose setae near the middle of the inner margin, and a plain seta near the base of
the outer margin of each foot, as shown in fig. 48.
Hahitat. In a tow-net gatliering from 360 fathoms. Lat. 1° 65' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E.,
collected January 22nd ; and in tow-net gatherings from 185 fathoms and 235 fathoms,
Station 23, collected February 5th.
Several specimens of this remarkable species were obtained. They do not agree with
^gisthus aculeatus, Giesbrecht, — e. y. the fifth pan- of thoracic feet, &c.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 14
106 ME. T. SCOTT OX ENTOMOSTEACA
Genus Clytemnestra, Dana.
Clytemnestra, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Sci. 1849.
Goniojjsyl/us, Brady, Report ' Challenger/ Copepoda, 1883.
Goniopelte, Claus, Arb. Zool. Inst. Wien, 1889.
Saphir, L. Car. 1890.
Head and first thoracic segment coalescent. Forehead usually subrostrate. The
joints of the cephalothorax much constricted in front, dilated behind so as to form
jirominent lateral triangular processes. Anterior antennee 6- to 8-jointed, geniculate in
the male. Posterior antennae 3(or 4 ?)-jointed ; secondary branch wanting, or very
small and rudimentary. Mandible slender, apex obscurely digitiform ; the palp absent
or very rudimentary. Maxillae also rudimentary. Anterior foot-jaw small, clawed at
the apex. Posterior foot-jaw elongate, 2- or 3-jointed; terminal claw, in the male, long
and powerful, in the female small. First pair of swimming-feet 2-branched, inner
branch 3-jointed, the outer with one to three joints. The second, third, and fourth
pairs nearly alike, 2-branched, both branches 3-jointcd. Feet of fifth pair 1-branched,
the branches similar and 1-jointed, and the same in both sexes.
Clytemnestra rostrata (Brady). (PL XII. figs. 47-57 ; PI. XIII. figs. 1-3.)
188.3. Goniopsyllus rostratus, Brady, Report on the ' Challenger ' Copepoda, p. 107, pi. xlii. figs. 9-16.
1849. Clytemnestra (?) scuteUata, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Science.
1860. Clytemnestra (?) tenuis, Lubbock, Trans. Linn. Soc. vol. xxiii. p. 180, pi. xxix. figs. 6, 7.
1889. (?) Goniopelte gracilis, CLaus, ArlD. Zool. Inst. Wien, t. ix.
Length about 1-25 mm. The body is usually more or less curved inwards. The fore-
head is subtruncate, with middle part produced forward so as to form a prominent rostrum.
Postero-lateral angles of the tirst four thoracic segments extended backward into
angular jirocesses ; the last thoracic segment smaller than either the preceding one or
the first al)dominal segment, its postero-lateral angles not produced. Abdomen 5-jointed
in the male, 4-jointed in the female ; the first abdominal segment in the female composed
of two coalescent segments, with usually a pellucid spot in the median dorsal line
(PI. XII. fig. 48). Body, seen dorsally, elongate, narrow, and tapering gradually from
the head backwards. Caudal stylets short, about as long as the last abdominal segment,
each furnished with a few short marginal hairs, and in the male with two long plumose
terminal setse. The plumose setae are wanting in the female and are replaced by two or
three plain and very small hairs. Anterior antennae in both male and female 7-jointed,
the proportional lengtlis of the segments being nearly as follows : —
Male. 12 . 19 . 6 . 22 . 3 . 18 . 25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Female. 12 . 20 . KJ . 15 . 15 . 17
The anterior antennae of both male and female are sparingly setiferous. There is a
hair-like filament on the upper margin and near the middle of the third joint in both
sexes, while the upper distal angle of the fourth segment and the extremity of the last
FEOM THE GULF OF GUmEA. 107
bear each two similar filaments or " sensory liairs," one of which on both seg-mcnts is
longer and stouter than the other. In the male the third (?) and last joints are hinged,
and the fifth hears a spiuiform ajipendage. The posterior antennte are of moderate length
and 3-jointed (Clans says 4-jointed, and the hasal joint of some of the ' Buccaneer '
specimens has a faint line, requiring the |-inch objective to see it, crossing the basal
segment near the middle, which may be a pseudo-joint ; hut there are certainly only
three distinct jo'mts in all of the ' Buccaneer' specimens examined), having at the distal
end of the first segment a 1-jointed rudimentary branch bearing two long terminal
plumose setae. The lower margin and the distal half of the surface of the last segment
of the primary branch is setose ; the upper edge of the same segment hears one, and at
the extremity five setae. Mandibles small, basal part somewhat dilated, the upper part
slender, with the extremity furcate or obscurely digitiform; the mandible-palp absent or
very rudimentary (no palp was observed in any of the ' Buccaneer ' specimens, though
they were dissected with the greatest possible care). Maxillae rudimentary, bearing two
terminal spiniforni seta?, and one seta near the middle of the basal part. Anterior foot-
jaws small ; the end joint with three terminal spiniform setae, the middle one being the
longest. Thei-e is at the end of the basal segment a lu-oportionally large marginal
process bearing thi-ee terminal spinif or tn hairs, which imparts to the anterior foot-jaws the
appearance as if they were 2-branched; a long, slender, marginal hair springs from
the i^roximal half of the basal joint. Posterior foot-jaws in the male large, composed of
two long segments and a long, curved, terminal claw, nearly as long as the second
joint, and forming a powerful prehensile organ ; the upj^er margin of the second
joint is finely serrate. The jjosterior foot-jaw in the female, which is also 2-jointed
(PI. XII. tig. 50), is shorter and more slender than that of the male, the terminal claw
being also short and feeble, the length of the whole ajjpendage being little, if at all,
longer than the first joint of the male cxppendage (Prof. Brady describes, loc. cit., the
posterior foot-jaws as possessing a rudimentary third joint, but no such joint was observed
in the ' Buccaneer ' specimens). First pair of swimming-feet 2-branched, inner branches
3-jointed, the last joint being the shortest ; outer branches 1-jointed, rather longer than
the first joint of the iimer branches. All the joints are furnished with long plumose
hairs ; a single plumose hair springs from the outer margin of the second basal joint.
Second, third, and fourth pairs nearly alike, also 2-branched, both branches 3-jointed,
joints subequal ; the outer branches rather shorter than the inner ones, all well furnished
with long plumose setae. Fifth pair of feet 1-branched, 2-jointed, slender, the second
joint twice the length of the first, bearing a long, slender, setiferous, terminal spine, and
a similar one on the iimer margin near the extremity of the joint; four short spinous
hairs spring at irregular intervals along the outer margin ; there is also a slender hair on
the outer margin and near the distal end of the first joint. The preceding description
of the five pairs of feet applies to both sexes. Ova not apparently enclosed in a sac, but
forming a single cluster somewhat similar to that of Eaclueta marina.
Habitat. Station 2, surface, January 1st (night tow-netting). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
14*
108 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
January 10th (day tow-netting). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms,
January 22nd (day tow-netthig). Station 23, 10, 185, 235 fathoms, February 5th, &c.
(day tow-nettings, and a surface night tow-netting).
This interesting species was obtained in 81 tow-nettings, 16 of these being surface and
15 under-surface collections. One of the surface and 9 of the under-surface tow-
nettings were day collections, while 15 surface and 6 under-surface were night collections,
as shown in the formula : —
r 1 day collection.
rl6 surface | 15 uigi^t coUections.
Tow-nettings 31^ . 9 day ditto.
(^ lo under-surface < •'
I 6 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 3 to 460 fathoms.
Clytemnestra rosfrata was of more or less frequent occurrence in nearly all the tow-
nettings in which it w^as observed. Siiecimens carrying ova were not uncommon in some
of the collections.
The form here described, including its real and supposed varieties, has been the
subject of a good deal of misunderstanding and controversy, due in great part to the
meagreness and insufficiency of Dana's description and figures. Nevertheless, after
having carefully dissected and examined a large number of specimens, I have no doubt
whatever that the species under consideration belongs to Dana's Clytemnestra, and I
hesitate to ascribe it to his Clytemnestra scutellata only because of the difference in
number of the joints of the inner branches of the first pair of swimming-feet, which in
C. scutellata, as described by Dana, are 3-jointcd, but which in the ' Buccaneer' specimens
are 1-jointed; and also because of the very marked difference in the form of the dorsal
aspect between the ' Buccaneer ' specimens and Dana's figure of Clytemnestra scutellata.
Dana's figure represents the thoracic as decidedly broader than the abdominal part of the
body, whereas the form of the ' Buccaneer ' specimens is elongate-narrow, with the breadth
gradually diminishing from the head to the last abdominal segment, and in this
respect they agree with Goniopsyllus rostratus, Brady, and Goniopelte gracilis, Clans.
Further, the ' Buccaneer' specimens differ from GoniopsyUus rostratus, as, figured and
described by Prof. Brady in the ' Challenger ' Report, in two important points : first, the
posterior antennse of the ' Buccaneer ' specimens possess a rudimentary but yet distinct
secondary branch bearing two plumose hairs, while in Goniopsyllus rostratus the secondary
branch is wanting, being represented by a single plumose hair attached to the end of
the basal joint of the primary branch ; second, the inner branches of the first pair of
swimming-feet in Goniopjsyllus rostratus are described as 3-jointed, whereas in the
' Buccaneer ' si)ecimens they are only 1-joiuted, and are so in both the male and female.
On the other hand, the species described and figured by Prof. Claus as Goniopelte gracilis
agrees, so far as I can make out, in every essential particular with the ' Buccaneer '
specimens, so that the ' Buccaneer ' specimens appear to belong to Goniopelte gracilis,
Claus, rather than to Goniopsyllus rostratus, Brady.
In an interesting paper by Prof. Claus in the ' Zoologischcr Anzeiger,' No. 378
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 109
(Nov. 30, 1891), he discusses somewhat fully the classification of the species now under
consideration, as well as that of its allied forms, and also the various opinions expressed
by different writers bearing on tlie same question. In this paper Prof. Clans shows, more
or less conclusively, that Sai^phir rosti^atus, L. Car., is synonymous with Goniopsyllus
rostratus, Brady, and also that Chjtemnestra Uendorffi, Poppe, is equivalent to Goniopelte
gracilis, Claus. In a concluding uote, referring to the likelihood that Goniopelte may
be synonymous with Goniopsyllus, he says : " But if it is desirable, — which I could not
advise, taking into account the different points, — that the two forms Goniojjelte and
Goniopsyllus should be made only different species of the same genus, Clytemnestra, for
reasons given in my work on Copepods, would not be valid as a generic name. It
must in that case be Goniopsyllus, Bi'ady." With all deference, however, to W'hat
Prof. Claus has stated, I prefer meantime to restore Dana's generic name, Chjtem-
nestra ; for, though his description be imperfect, there need be no uncertainty as to his
figures.
{Note. — The jireccding remarks on Chjtemnestra were written at the close of 1891, and
long before I saw Giesbrecht's Monograph of the Neapolitan Copejjoda.)
Genus Setella, Dana.
Setella, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. 1852.
Setella gracilis, Dana.
1852. Setella gracilis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1198, pi. Ixxxv. figs. 3 a, g.
1883. Setella gracilis, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 108, pi. 1. figs. 1-10.
Habitat. — Station 2, 5 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (night collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms,
January 22nd (day collection). Station 18, surface, Pebruary 3rd (day collection).
Lat. 6" 47' 5" S., long. 11" 30' 6" E., surface, February 8th (day collection), etc.
Setella gracilis was obtained in 85 tow-nettings, 31 of which were surface and 51
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface gatherings were from various depths, from
2-| to 460 fathoms. 11 of the surface and 34 of the under-surface tow-nettings were
collected during the day, and 23 of the surface and 17 under-surface w^ere night collec-
tions, as shown by the formula : —
11 day collections.
34 surface
{.
... n^ , l23 nisht ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 8o ^ r o . i ' t
( 51 under-surface | 3* "'^^ ^^i^*"-
1 17 night ditto.
A considerable proportion of the specimens carried ovisacs. The size of the specimens
varied sufficiently to lead me to think that there were more than one species of Setella
in the collection ; but careful dissection showed little, if any, structural diflPerence
among the specimens, and any structural difference observed was easily accounted for by
difference in maturity or sex.
110 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
Section II. P(ECIL0ST03fA, Thorell.
Family COEYCiEID^, Dana.
Genus Cortc^eus, Dana.
Corycmiis, Dana, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelpliia, 1845.
Corijc<eus, Brady, Report ou the Copepoda of the ' Challenger ' Expedition, 1883.
CoKTC^us VARius, Dana.
1852. Corycaus varius, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1211, pi. Ixxxv. figs. 4 a-i.
1856. Corycaus styliferus, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. iv. N. S. pi. v. figs. 7, 8.
1863. Corycatts furcifer, Glaus, Die freilebenden Copep. p. 157, pi. xxiv. figs. 7-12.
1883. CoryccBus varius, Brady, Report Chall. Copepoda, p. Ill, pi. lii. figs. 1-14.
Habitat. Station 2, 25 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, 50 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Lat. 1° 56' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 460 fathoms,
January 22n(l (day collection). Station 18, surface, February 3rd (day collection).
Bananah Creek, Congo River, surface, February 7th (day collection), »&c.
This CoryccEus was obsei'ved in 110 tow-nettings, comprising 48 surface and 62 uuder-
surface gatherings. The under-surface gatherings ranged in depth from 2 to 400
fathoms. 23 of the surface and 44 of the under-surface tow-nettings were day collections,
while 25 surface and 18 under-surface were uight collections, as shown by the annexed
formula : —
r 23 day collections.
... ^_r48 surface { 25 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 110< > ,, , =' ,.^^
162 under-surface 1^^ ^^^^ ^^^tto.
I- 18 night ditto.
This was the most common species of Corycceus in the collection, both as regards its
general distribution throughout the area examined and its frequency in the tow-nettings
in which it occurred.
Corycaus pellucidus, Dana.
1852. Cory cceus pellucidus, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1224, pi. Ixxxvi. fig. G.
1863. Coryceeus rostratus, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden, p. 157, pi. xxviii. fig. 5.
1883. Cory ccEus pellucidus, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 112, pi. lii. figs. 15-19.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, surface,
25 and 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collections). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface,
January 27th (one day and one niglit collection). Station 18, surAice, February 3rd
(day collection). Lat. 7° 38' S., long. 12" 3' 3" E., surface, February 9th (night
collection), &c.
This Coryceeus, which was a moderately common species in the collection, occurred
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. Ill
in 81 of the tow-nettiugs, wliich comprised 42 surface aud 3i) iinder-surface gatherings.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged in depth from 2 to 360 fathoms. 15 of the
surface and 30 under-surface tow-nettings were day collections, while 27 surface and 9
under-surface were night collections, as shown in the formula :—
r 15 day collections,
r -12 surface { 37 ^^.^ ditto.
Tow-ncttmgs 81 < ^„^ 1 ■,-,,
1 39 under-surface / ^0 day ditto.
(. 9 night ditto.
The distrihution of Corycceus pelbicidus was co-extensive "with the area examined.
The long spine-like and strongly setiferous hairs of the posterior foot-jaws form an easily
recognized character of this species.
CoRTC^us LIMBATUS, Brady.
1883. Conjcceus Umbatus, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 114, pi. xlix. figs. 18-22.
Habitat. Station 2, night collection. January 1st. Station 9, 50 fathoms, January 10th
(day collection). Station 11, 10 fjxtlioms, January 19th (day collection). Lagoon, Sfio
Thome Island, surface, January 27th (night collection). Lat. 7° 38' S., long. 12° 3' 3" E.,
surface, February 9th (night collection), &c.
Corycceus Umbatus was obtained in 25 tow-nettings, 10 of which were surface and 15
under-surface gatherings. The dejith of the under-surface toAv-nettings ranged from
2| to 50 fathoms, exclusive of two, one of which was from 260 fathoms and one from
360 fathoms. 4 of the surface and 10 of the under-surface tow-nettings — including the
two specially referred to — were day collections, while 6 of the surface and 5 of the under-
surface were night collections, as shown by the formula : —
4 day collections.
f 4 day collect:
10 surface | 6 night ditto
{'I
Tow-nettings 25 , ,^ ,
[15 under-surface f 10 ^^y^^itto.
5 night ditto.
This Corycceus, though generally distributed over the area examined, was nevertheless
a comparatively rare species, only a few specimens at most being observed in any one
of the tow-nettings in which it occurred.
CoKYC^us VENUSTUS, Dana.
1852. Corycmis venusfus, Dana, Crust. U. S. Expl. Exped. p. 1222, pi. Ixxxvi. figs. 4 a-d.
1883. Corycmis renu.stus,V,xa.Ay, Report Chall. Copep. p. 115, pi. liv. figs. 8-10.
Habitat. Station 2, surface, January 1st (night collection). Station 9, surface and
25 fathoms, January 10th (day collections). Lat. 1 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 30 and
460 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections). Lat. 6 23' 3" S.,long. 11° 3' 8" E., surface,
February 8th (day collection).
This species — one of the rarer of the CorycmidcB in the collection — was obtained in
24 tow-nettings, 13 of which were surface and 11 under-surface gatherings. The
112 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
svxrface tow-nettings comprised 7 day and G night collections, and the under-surface
7 day and 1 night collections, as shown in the formula : —
f 7 day collections.
,,. ^ J 13 surface ( 6 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 2i< ^„ -, ,.,,
Ill under-surface (^ ^% ^^^^to.
1. 4 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings included four at 10 fathoms, one at 15 fathoms, one
at 20 fathoms, two at 25 fathoms, one at 30 fathoms, one at 60 fathoms, and one at 160
fathoms.
CoRTC^us sPECiosus, Dana.
1852. Corycfeus speciostis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1222, pi. lxxx\'i. figs. 4a-d.
1883. CoryccBus speciosus, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 115, pi. liv. figs. 8-10.
Habitat. Station 2, 5, 25, and 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
surface, 25 and 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collections). Lat. 1 55' 5" N., long.
5° 55' 5" E., 10, 20, 30, 60, 260, 360, and 160 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections :
the nets were fixed at intervals on a deep-sea line and exposed simultaneously
from 11 A.M. to 2.23 p.m.). Station 23, surface, 10, 20, 135, 185, and 235 fathoms,
February 5th (day collections : nets fixed on deep-sea line and exposed simultaneously
from 11 A.M. to 3.30 p.m.). Lat. T 54' 6" S., long. 12' 11' 7" E., surface, Eebruary 9th
(day collection), &c.
This fine and well-marked species was observed in 86 tow-nettings, 32 of which
were surface and 51 under-surface collections. The depth of the under-surface
tow-nettings ranged from 2 to 460 fathoms. 17 of the surface and 39 of the imder-
surface tow-nettings were day collections, while 15 surface and 15 under-surface were
night collections, as shown in the annexed formula : —
rl7 day collections,
r 32 surface 1 15 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 86 < , ..^ , ,.,,
1 54 under-surface ( "^^ '^""^ '^^^^''^
1 15 nidit ditto.
"a^
o
Corycceus speciosus was one of the more common species of the Gorycceidce observed
in the collection, but it was not obtained in any gathering from localities where the
water was of a decidedly brackish character, as at Bananah Creek. The remarkably
divergent caudal stylets made this an easily recognized species ; several specimens were
obtained with ovisacs.
CoRTC^us OBTUSUS, Dana.
1852. Corycieus obtusus, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Expcd. p. 1211, pi. Ixxxv. fig. 6.
1857. V Corycceus angUcus, Lubbock, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xx. pi. xi. figs. 14-17.
1883. Coryaeus obtusus, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 116, pi. xlvi. figs. 7-9.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Ofi' Accra, 3 fathoms,
January 16th (day collection). Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, surface, January 27th (night
collection). Loanda Harbour, surface, Eebruary 13tli (day collection).
FKOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 113
Corycceus ohtusus Avas observecl in 39 tow-nettings, 23 of which were surface and IG
under-surfaee gatherings ; 7 of the surface and 10 of the undor-surface tow-nettings
were collected during the day, while 10 of the surface and 6 of the under-surface were
night collections, as shown in the annexed formula : —
j 7 day collections.
f 23 surface \ -,n „^„k+ a-*.*.^
m j-i- on ) 1 1" night ditto.
Tow-nettings 39 < i. &
(.10 under-surface { ^^^ '^^y '^it^^-
1 0 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 2i to 50 fathoms, and one at 185 fatlioms.
The hook-like process at the base and on the under surface of the first abdominal
segment seems to be peculiar to this species and forms one of its distinctive characters.
Genus Copilia, Dana. -^
Copilia, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Sci. 1849; Brady, Report on the Copepoda
of the ' Challenger' Expedition, 1883.
Copilia mirabilis, Dana.
1852. Copilia mirabilis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1232, pi. Ixxx. figs. 14 a-g.
1856. Saphirina styUfera, Lubbock, Trans. Entom. Soc. vol. iv. p. 28, pi. iv. figs. 9, 10 ^ .
1863. ? Copilia denticulata, Claus, Die freilebcnden Copepoden, p. 161, pi. xxv. figs. 14-20.
1883. Copilia mirabilis, Brady, Report Chall. Copepoda, p. 117, pi. liii. figs. 1-11.
Habitat. Station 2, surface and 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collection). Station 9,
surface and 25 and 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., lono'.
5° 55' 5" E., 10, 20, 30, 60, and 300 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection). Station 23,
surface, February 5th (day collection).
Copilia mirabilis was observed in 70 tow-nettings, 21. of which were surface and 46
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface gatherings ranged in depth from 2 to 300
fathoms. 12 of the surface and 33 of the under-surface tow-nettings were day collections,
while 12 surface and 13 under-surface were night collections, as shown by the annexed
formula : —
f 12 day collections.
..• ,^(24 surface 1 12 night ditto.
Tow-nettings 70 ^ r ^ -, T
(.46 under-surface P3 '% ^^^^to.
1 13 night ditto.
This species was of frequent occurrence in several of the tow-nettings.
Copilia qladeata, Dana.
1849. Copilia quadrata, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Boston, vol. ii.
1866. Sapiiirinella pellucida, Claus, Die Copepoden-Fauna von Nizza.
1892. Copilia quadrata, Giesbrecht, Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel (Pelagische Copepoden),
p. 658, pi. 2. fig. 3, pi. 50. figs. 1, 10, 13, 16, 22, 28, 33, 36, 41.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 15
114i MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Uahltat. Station 23 (lat. i^ 26' 7" S., long. 10 1' 8" E.), 30 fathoms, in a tow-net
slathering collected between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. A few specimens (male and female)
were observed ; they were readily distinguished by being larger and much broader in
proportion to the length than the others.
? COPILIA DENTICULATA, Claus.
1863. Copilia denticulata, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepodcn, p. 161, pi. xxv. figs. 14-20.
One or two specimens ( 2 ) of a Copilia apparently belonging to this species occurred
in a few of the tow-net gatherings along with Copilia mirabilis.
Copilia Pultoni, n. sp. (PI. XI. figs. 15-50 ; PL XII. figs. 1-3.)
Length, including caudal stylets, 5"3 mm. {\j of an inch), the length of the caudal
stylets is about 1"6 mm. The first cephalothoracic segment is equal to about four-tenths
of tlie entire length of the animal, including the stylets. Anterior antennae as in Copilia
mirabilis, Dana, 6-jointed, the proportional lengths of the joints as in the formula : —
40 . 35^ 17^5^. 17_^
1 2 "~3 ^ 5 W
Posterior antennse and mandibles also nearly as in Copilia mirabilis, except that the
third joint of the posterior antennse is scarcely two-thirds the length of the preceding
joint, and tlie marginal spine of the second joint is much smaller than that on the intero-
distal angle of the first joint (PI. XL figs. 47-48). The maxillfe consist each of a single
broadly spatulate joint bearing three apical spines (PI. XL fig. 49). Anterior foot-
jaws stout, 1-joiuted, and provided with two terminal spines and two lateral spiniform
seta3 (PL XL fig, 50). Posterior foot-jaws 2-jointed and armed with a stout, nearly
straight claw (PL XII. fig. 1). SAvimming-feet as in Copilia mirabilis. Fifth pair rudi-
mentary, each consisting of one small joint provided with a terminal spine and two small
setae. The abdomen is 4-jointed and is about equal to the combined length of the
last three thoracic segments ; the postero-distal angles of the first a1)dominal segment
each bear two small spiniform seta?, and the last joint is about equal to the combined
length of the two preceding joints. The second last thoracic segment only is produced
into a median dorsal spine.
Habitat. Station 23, in a tow-net gathering from 30 fathoms, collected February 5th.
Only three specimens were obtained.
The comparatively short posterior abdominal segment distinguishes this species at a
glance from Copilia mirabilis, Dana. It differs from Cojjilia Briicll, I. C. Thompson,
by the evenly rounded outline of the first body-segment, in the proportional length of
the joints of the posterior antenna;, in the second last thoracic segment being produced
into a median dorsal spine, and in the presence of a fifth pair of feet, besides one or two
other points shown by the drawings.
In the Report on the ' Challenger ' Copepoda the abdomen of Copilia is, in the
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 115
definition of the genus, stated to eonsist of five segments, and in the drawings of CopUin
mirahllls the fourth pair of swimming-feet are I'eiJresented as attached to wliat is descrihed
as the last thoracic segment ; if this he correct, then, shouki a fifth pair of feet he present,
they would necessarily be attached to the same segment as the fourth pair, which Avould
be very unusual, the fifth pair only being usually attached to tlie last segment of the
thorax. In the species now described, if the abdomen be held to consist of five segments,
the appendages of the first segment are not a fifth pair of feet, and the fourth pair are
attached to what, in that case, is the last thoracic segment, and a separate segment, for
the support of a fifth pair of feet, is entirely absent. In these circumstances I prefer
to consider the abdomen as consisting of four segments and that the fourth pair of
swimming-feet are appendages of the second last segment of the thorax, and further that
the rudimentary appendages of the next, or last, thoracic segment are a fifth pair of feet,
because such an arrangement of the parts is more in harmony witli those of closely
allied genera.
Genus Ltjbbockia, Clans.
Lubbockia, Claus, Die freilebeiulcn CopeiJodcu, 1863 ; Brady, Report on the
Copepoda of the ' Challenger' Expedition, 1883.
LUBCOCKIA SQUILLIMANA, Claus.
1863. Lubbockia squiUimana, Claus, Die freilebenden Copcpodcn, p. 164, jil. xxv. figs. 1-5.
1883. Lubbockia squiUimana, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 118, pi. liii. figs. 12-16, pi. liv. figs. 1-7.
Hcdntat. Station 3, 100 fathoms, January 2nd (day collection). Station 9, 25 fathoms,
January 10th (day collection). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms,
January 22nd (day collection). Station 23, surface and at 10 fathoms, February 5th (day
collection). Lat. 8° 30' 8" S., long. 12 5' 7" E., surface, February 9th (day collection), &c.
Luhhockia squilUmana was observed in 39 tow-nettings, 13 of which were surface
gatherings and 26 under-surface. The under-surface gatherings were from various
depths from 10 to 360 fathoms ; 3 of the surface and 18 of the iinder-surface tow-
iiettings Avere day collections, while 10 surface and S under-surface were night collections,
as in the formula : —
r 3 day collections.
..• on f ^'^ '"''^'''''' i 10 night ditto.
Tow-nettmgs 39 < "
I 26 under-surface j 18 day ditto.
I 8 night ditto.
Though generally distributed throughout the ar(^a represented in this Report, and
though observed in a considerable number of gatherings, Luhhockia was of less frequent
occurrence in the tow-nettings in which it was obtained than some other species with a
more restricted distribution. Specimens of both sexes were collected, but females were
much more common than males ; several females carrying ovisacs were taken.
15*
116 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
Genus Onc^a, Philippi.
Onceea, Philippi, Wiegmana's Arcliiv, 1843.
Antaria, Dana, Proc. Amer. Acad. Sci. 1849.
Onc^a obtusa (Dana).
1843. Onceea venustat, Philippi, Wiegmanu's Archiv, pi. 111. fig. 3.
1852. Antaria obtusa, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1230, pi. Ixxxvi. figs. 13 a-c.
1883. Onceea obtusa, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 120, pi. li. figs. 1-11.
Habitat. Station 2, surface, 5, 25, and 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collections).
Station 9, surface, 25 and 50 fathoms, January 10th (day collections). Lat. 1° 55' 5" N.,
long. 5° 55' 5" E., 10, 20, 30, 260, 360, and 460 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections).
Bananah Creek, Congo River, surface, February 7th (day collection). Loanda Harbour,
surface, Pebruary 13th (day collection).
Onccea obtusa was observed in 119 tow-nettings, 60 of wdiich were surface and 59
under-surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings ranged in depth from 2 to
460 fathoms. 20 of the surface and 41 of the under-surface gatherings were day col-
lections ; 34 of the surface and 18 of the under-surface gatherings were night collections,
as shown by the formula : —
26 day collections.
r lb clay collect!
60 surface \ 3^ ^^„^^ ^j^to
Tow-nettings 119 , .-, n tm;
(.59 under-surface P^^^'^y^^^^*^-
(. 18 night ditto.
This was one of the most common and most generally distributed species in the
' Buccaneer ' collection ; many of the specimens carried ovisacs, and though the collection
had been for several years in spirit a considerable proportion of the OnccBce retained
much of the vivid coloration so characteristic of the species.
ONcasA GRACILIS (Dana). (PI. XIII. figs. 4-12.)
1853. Antaria gracilis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1229, pi. Ixxxvi. fig. 11 a.
Length I'l mm. Cephalothoras narrow, ovate. Abdomen elongate, slender ; the
breadth of the first abdominal segment is somewhat less than two-thirds its length, and
one-third the length of the abdomen, exclusive of the stylets ; the second segment is
scarcely half the length of the first, and equal to the combined length of the next two ;
the third segment is nearly twice the length of the last, while the caudal stylets are
somewhat longer than the last abdominal segment (fig. 12). The anterior antenna? are
similar to those of OnccBa obtusa, but are more slender ; the relative lengths of the joints
are nearly as in the formula : —
4 . 4 . 13 . 2 . 1 . 3
r~2 3 4 5 6'
The last joint of the posterior antennte about as long as the preceding one, but more
slender and furnished with four long, stout, ajjical setae, and another seta near the base.
Mouth-appendages nearly as in Onceea obtusa, except that the last joint of the posterior
foot-jaw is elongate and armed with a long, powerful, nearly straight terminal claw.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 117
which is finely serrate on the inner edge (fig. 10). First swimming-feet also similar to
that species, but more slender, and provided with much longer terminal spines, — the
terminal spine of the outer branch is equal to about three times the length of the joint
from which it springs. The terminal spines of the three pairs (both branches) are also
long. The inner branch of the fourth pair is much shorter than the outer branch, and
its three joints are nearly equal in length ; the terminal spine is long and setiform.
Fifth pair of feet as in Onccea obtum.
Habitat. Station 2, 50 fathoms, collected January 1st, between 7.20 and 8.20
P.M. Station 9, 50 fiithoms, collected January 10th, during the day. Ofi" Appi *
(near Porto Novo), surface, collected January 18th (day). Lat. 3° 55' 3" N.,
long. 4° 7' 3" E., 30 fathoms, collected January 20th. Lat. 2° 34' 9" N., long. 5° 22' 2" E.,
20 fathoms, collected January 21st. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 360 fathoms,
collected January 22nd. Station 23, in two gatherings at 30 and 85 fathoms, collected
February 5th. All the gatherings except the first one w^ere collected during the day.
Though I have included this species under Onccea, it nevertheless differs very
markedly from the very common Onccea ohtusa, Dana. The last joint of the posterior
antennse is elongate and slender ; the inner branch of the fourth pair of swimming-feet is
considerably shorter than the outer branch, and consists of three nearly equal joints ;
the al)domen is long and slender, and the last three segments are much longer, com-
paratively, than in Onccea obtusa. These differences, taken together, should j^erhaps be
considered of more than merely specific value, but I prefer meantime to refer the species
above described to Oncceci.
Note. — The species described above agrees in several points with Concea rapax,
Giesbrecht (Mon. Pelag. Copep. of the Gulf of Naples), and should perhaps be ascribed
to that genus.
ONCiEA MEDITERRANEA (Claus). (PI. XIII. figS. 13-17.)
1863. Antaria mediterranea, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepadeu, jj. 159, pi. xxx. figs. 1-7.
Length '85 mm. (l-30th of an inch). Somewhat like Onccea obtusa in general form,
but with a proportionally shorter abdomen. Abdomen, including caudal stylets, equal
to about two-fifths the length of the ccphalothorax ; length of first abdominal segment
equal to about twice the breadth, and to fully twice the entire length, of the remaining
segments ; and, togetlier with the caudal stylets, the length of the last abdominal
segment is rather greater than that of the two iireceding segments added together.
Caudal stylets about twice as long as broad, and nearly equal in length to the last two
abdommal segments. Anterior antennse slender ; the pro2)ortional lengths of the joints
are nearly as shown in the formula : —
2.3.8.2.1.2
12 3 4 5 0"
* Note lij Mr. llattray. — " Appi is a flourishing village, with three French factories. It is the nearest port to
the inland town of Porto Novo, and communicates with it by a lagoon. The surf at Appi is very heavy, and it is
impossible to land except in a native boat built for that purpose. The boats are manned by about sixteen negroes
and propelled by paddles. The beach is steep and sandy."
lis ME. T. SCOTT ON EXTOIMOSTEACA
Last, joint of the posterior antennEe fully three-fourths the length of the precetlinp^
joint. Mouth-organs similar to those of Oiicaa ohtusa, except that the last joint of the
posterior foot-jaw is broadly ovate; the fringe of hairs on the inner margin extends
backwards from the apex nearly three-fourths the length of the joint, and is bounded at
the proximal end by a small spine (fig. 16). The swimming-feet are similar to those of
Onccea ohtusa, but the joints, especially of the outer branches of the first pair, are
jiroportionally longer, and the length of the terminal spines of both branches of all the
swimming-feet is much greater than those of that species : in the iiist pair the terminal
spine of the outer branches is equal to the combined length of the second and last joints ;
in the fourth pair the terminal spines of both branches are equal to the entire length of
the branches they spring from ; the terminal spines of the inner branches are also serrate
on both branches. The fifth pair, like those of Onccea ohtusa, are very small and rudi-
mentary. One or two females only of this species were obtained.
Habitat. Station 9, 50 fathoms, collected January 10th. Lat. 1^ 55' 5'' N., long.
5' 55' 5" E., 300 ftithoms, collected January 22nd.
This species, though closely resembling Onccea ohtusa, appears to be quite distinct
from it ; the following are some points in which it differs from that species : — the last
joint of the secondary branch of the posterior antennae is considerably longer ; the joints
of the outer branches of the first swimming-feet are proportionally longer ; the abdomen
is shorter, being only equal to about two-fifths of the length of the cephalothorax ; and
the terminal spines of the swimming-feet, and especially of the fourth pair, are of much
greater length than those of Onccea ohtusa. Onccea mecliterranea (Claus) seems to agree
much closer with this species than with Onccea ohtusa (Dana), and I have therefore
ascribed it to the species described by Dr. Claus.
Genus Hersiliodes, Canu, 1888.
Hersilioees LiviNGSTONi, n. sp. (PI. XIII. figs. 31-38.)
Length, exclusive of tail-setse, 1-03 mm. Viewed dorsally the body is broadly ovate,
and much constricted near the posterior end ; it is composed of six segments, the first
being nearly equal to the entire length of the other five ; the fifth segment is short, and
considerably narrower than that which precedes or follows it ; the breadth of the last
segment is greatest posteriorly. Forehead rounded. Anterior antennae stout, 7-
jointed, and bearing numerous setiB; the proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as
shown in the formula : —
15 . 25 ■ 12 . 18 . 14 . 11 . 11
12 3 4 5 6 7 ■
Posterior antenniie stout, 4-jointed, the first joint being nearly equal to the
combined length of the other three; the third joint bears two stout curved spines at the
exterior distal angle, while the truncate extremity of the last joint is armed with four
elongate curved sj)ines and a few setse (fig. 33). The mouth is in the form of a small
conical tube, the margin of which is fringed with cilia. The mandible is armed
exteriorly with a stout, somewhat curved tooth, having a doul:)le row of scrratures along
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 11!)
its inner margin, and interiorly with tliree setiferous spines. Maxillse simple,
terminating in two very short and rounded spiniferous lohes (tig. 3i). The anterior
foot -jaws are furnished with a short, stout, and slightly curved terminal claw, which is
provided Avith several setiferous spines at the base, while two stout setiferous sjiines
spring from the end of the tirst joint ai\d close to the basal part of the claw. The
posterior foot-jaws are large ; they arc furnished with several spiniform plumose setae on
the inner margin, and terminate in stout, elongate, and strongly curved claws, from the
base of which springs a strong and curved claw-like spine (fig. 35). Both branches of
the first four pairs of swimming-feet 3-jointed ; joints short and broad. The exterior
margin of the outer branches of the first pair is furnished with four spines, — one on
each of the first and second, and two on the last joint. Hound the end and inner margin
of the last joint there are six long plumose setae, while one long seta, also plumose,
springs from the inner distal angle of the second joint. The first and second joints of the
inner branches have no spine on the outer margin ; the outer distal angle of the second
joint forms a tooth-like process; the last joint is furnished with a stout spine on the
lower half of the exterior margin, — the margin being hollowed out to receive the base of
the spine; there are also five plumose setae round the end and inner edge of the last
joint. The extremities of both branches of the second, third, and fovxrth pairs are
armed with one long and one short spine ; the long sj)ine of the outer branches is ciliate
along the inner edge (tig. 37). The foot of the fifth pair consists of a broad foliaceous
joint, rounded at the extremity, and furnished with one long terminal and three small
submarginal setse (fig. 38). Abdomen composed of four segments; the first is con-
siderably dilated, the first, third, and fourth are about equal in length, but the second is
rather longer. Caudal stylets half as long again as the last abdominal segment, some-
what divergent, and furnished AA^th two long and three short terminal set£e ; there is also
a small submarginal spine about one-third the length of the stylet from the extremity
(fig. 31).
Habitat. Loanda Harbour ; surface tow-net gathering, collected February 15.
Genus Pachysoma, Claus.
Pachysoma, Claus, Die freilebenden Copepoden, 1863.
Pachysoma punctatum, Glaus. (PI. XIII. figs. 18-21.)
1863. Pachysoma jMnctatiim, Claus, op. cit. p. 163, pi. xxv. figs. C-11.
Length 2"5 mm. Body rotund; forehead produced into a small triangular pointed
rostrum. Anterior antennae very short, stout, 7-jointed, the third and fourth joints
shorter than the others ; the proportional lengths of the joints are as follows : —
30 .2.5. 9 .12. 22 . 20 . 1.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 '
Posterior antennae nearly as in Liohomolgiis, 1-jointed, the third joint short, the others
of moderate length and subequal (fig. 20). Mandibles small, stylet-shaped, ciliate along
one edge ; the maxillae consist of small 1-jointed appendages bearing two long apical
120 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTE.ACA
setse. Anterior foot-jaws rudimentary, 1-jointed, with a moderately stout terminal
claw and a small seta (fig. 23). Basal joint of posterior foot-jaws greatly dilated ;
second joint stout, bearing two marginal spiniform setae and armed with a strong curved
terminal claw, which is provided with a small seta near the base and on the inner
aspect. Swimming-feet nearly as in Lichomolgiis, both branches 3-jointed ; the setse on
their inner margins are stout and densely plumose ; the inner branches are considerably
lono-er than the outer (fig. 2\). Eifth pair rudimentary and provided with one small
marginal and two apical plumose setae. Abdomen short, composed of four segments ;
first segment large, the next three much shorter and narrower ; in the male the postero-
lateral angles of the first abdominal segment carry two plumose setse. Caudal stylets
about equal in length to the first abdominal segment ; apical setse three, and one on the
outer edge about one-third the length of the stylet from the proximal end. The
structure of the integument is shown in fig. 18.
KaUtat. Station 9, in a tow-netting from 25 fathoms. Lat. 2' 34.' 9" N., long. 5' 22' 2"
E., 20 fathoms. Station 14, in two tow-net gatherings from 10 and 20 fathoms.
Lat. r 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., 20 fathoms, and lat. 0' 21' 1" N., long. T 0' 33" E.,
20 fathoms.
Though observed in these six separate tow-net gatherings, very few specimens were
obtained.
Genus Lichomolgus, Thorell.
Lichomolgus, Thorell, Om Krustaceer i Ascidier, p. 74 (1859).
LiCHOMOLGTJS CONGOENSIS, n. sp. (PL XIII. figs. 39-48.)
Length fully 1 mm. Cei^halothorax moderately robust. Anterior antennae fully half
the length of the first cophalothoracic segment, 7-jointed, nearly as in Lichomolgus
fucicolus; the relative lengtlis of the joints are shown in the formula : —
12 . 26 . 8 ■ 17 . 18 . 15 . 10
12 3 4 5 6 7'
Posterior antennae 4-jointed ; first, second, and fourth joints elongate, subequal ; third
joint very short and bearing two stout seta3 on the upper distal angle ; the last joint is
armed with two slender curved terminal spines and two setse ; there is also a small seta
on the inner margin near the apex (fig. 41). The mandible consists of a comparatively
broad and apparently abruptly bent process, the truncate apex of which is furnished
with a comb-like fringe of short setae ; a stout stylet-like appendage, finely crenate on
the upper edge, springs from the outer distal angle, and is closely applied to the
anterior edge of the ajipendage, and extends some distance beyond its fringed apex
(fig. 42). The maxillae are simple 1-jointcd appendages, bearing a few apical setae
(fig. 43). Eoot-jaws nearly as in Lichomolgus fucicolus, except that the posterior foot-
jaw is armed with a long curved spine on the inner margin of the proximal half of the
second joint (fig. 45). The four pairs of swimming-feet are also nearly as in Lichomolgus
fucicolus, except that there are stout dagger-shaped spines on the exterior margin and
FEOM THE QVLF OF GUINEA. 121
apex of the outer branches ; the apex of the inner branches is also provided with similar
spines ; the inner branch of the fourth pair is 2-jointed (fig. 4G). Fifth pair subquad-
rangular, rather longer than broad, and furnished with two stout terminal spines.
Abdomen scarcely equal to half the length of the cephalothorax. Caudal stylets about
as long as broad, and three-fourths the length of the last abdominal segment. The
fourth tail-seta, counting from the outside, is stouter and rather longer than the others.
HahitcU. Bananah Creek, Congo River, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected
Eebruary 6th. Only two specimens (females) were obtained.
Genus Pseudanthessius, Claus.
Pseudanfhessius, Claus, Arb. Zool. Inst. Wien, 1889.
PSETJDANTHESSITJS PUOPINQUITS, n. sp. (PI. XIII. figs. 49-56; PL XIV. figs. 1, 4.)
Length 1'3 mm. (l-18th of an inch). Anterior antennae 7-jointed; the formula shows
the proportional lengths of the joints : —
12 . 21 . 6 . 12 . 12 . 11 . 8
12 3 4 5 0 7
The short penultimate joint of the posterior antenna3 bears a long slender spine on its
upper distal angle ; the last joint is provided \vdth a stout curved apical spine and five
setae. Mandibles somewhat as in Lichomolgus congoensis, but the stylet-like appendage
is longer and strongly dentate on the upper edge, the basal tooth being much larger
than the others (PI. XIII. fig. 52). Maxillae armed with three stout terminal spines,
two of which are serrate on both edges, and a small marginal seta (PI. XIII. fig. 53).
Anterior foot-jaws stout, 1-jointed, and provided with four strong terminal spines, the
two larger of which are furnished with several tooth-like processes. Posterior foot-jaws
in the female short, 3-jointed ; the second joint carries two short, stout, marginal spines,
and the last joint, which is small, carries one terminal and four lateral seta3 (PL XIII.
fig. 54). In the male the posterior foot- jaws are more slender; the first and second
joints are fully twice as long as broad, and the inner margin is fringed with cilia ; the
last joint is very short and forms the base of a stout, elongate, curved claw, which is fur-
nished with two small setae near the base. The fourth pair of swimming-feet are nearly
as in Pseudanthessim Thorelli (Brady), but the margins of the 1-jointed inner branches
are not ciliate ; a moderately long plumose seta springs from the proximal half of the
inner edge (?and probably also from the outer edge opposite to the other) (PL XIV.
fig. 3). The first three pairs of swimmiug-feet are nearly as in Lichomolgus fucicolus.
The fifth pair consist each of a moderately stout joint, furnished with two apical spines.
Abdomen, inclusive of stylets, nearly equal to three-foiu'ths the length of the cephalo-
thorax : in the male the first segment is as long as the next two together ; in the female
the first segment is rather more than half the length of the abdomen, the remaining three
segments are as in the male. Caudal stylets once and a half the length of the last
abdominal segment, and furnished with one seta near the middle of the outer margin and
four apical setae.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected February 15th.
Very few specimens were obtained.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 16
122 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Genus Saphieina, Thompson.
Saphirina, Thompson, Zoological Researches, 1829
Saphieina ovalis, Dana.
1852. Saphirina oralis, Dana.
1883. Saphinna ovalis, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 123, pi. xlvii. figs. 1-12.
Habitat. Station 2, January 1st (night collection). Lat. 1" 55' 5" N., long. 5^ 55' 5"E.,
10 and 30 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections). Station 21, surface, February 4th
(day collection). Station 2i, surface, February 6th (day collection), etc.
This Saphirine was obtained in 27 tow-nettings, 10 of wliich were surface and 17
under-surface gatherings. The uuder-surface tow-nettings ranged from 2 to 50 fathoms,
with the exception of one which was from 185 fathomxS. 2 of the surface and 13 of the
under-surface were day collections, while 8 surface and 4 under-surface were night collec-
tions, as shown in the formula : —
J 2 day collections,
f 10 surface. |. g night ditto.
Tow-nettings 27 . -^3 ^ ^^^^^
I 17 under-surface < •'
K 4 night ditto.
Only one or at most very few speciniens were observed in any one of the tow-nettings,
Tlie females of Safhlrlna ovalis were usually readily distinguished from other Saphirines
by the numerous, circular, opaque white spots scattered somewhat symmetrically over the
entire dorsal surface, and which imparted a rather elegant appearance to the specimens.
(It will be understood that the ornamentation described is that of specimens which have
been several years in spirit.)
Note. — This appears to be the species described by Giesbrecht as Saphirina stellata
and = S. ovalis of Dr. Brady's ' Challenger ' Coi)epoda, but not S. ovalis, Dana.
Saphieina inj^qualis, Dana. (Not S. nlgromaculata, Claus.)
1852. Saphirina inatqualis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1241, pi. Ixxxvii. fig. 7.
1860. Saphirina elegans ( ? ), Lubbock, Trans. Liuu. Soc. vol. xxiii. p. 12, pi. xxix. figs. 18, ID.
1883. Saphirina incequalis, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 124, pi. xlviii. iigs. 1-5.
Ilahitat. Station 9, 25 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Station 11, 10 fathoms,
January 19th (day collection). Station 14, 20 fcithoms, January 21st (night collection).
Station 18, surface, February 3rd (day collection). Station 24, surface, February 6tli
(day coUection). Lat. 5' 40' 8" S., long. 11 33' 4" E., surface, February 19th (day col-
lection), &c.
Saphirina incequalis was observed in 41 tow-nettings, 22 of which were surface and 19
under-surface gatherings ; 8 of the surface and 14 of the under-surface gatherings were
day collections, Avhile 11 of the surface and 5 of the under-surface were night collections.
The under-surface tow-nettings ranged from 2| to 25 fathoms, with the exception of one
which was from 360 fathoms.
5 dav collections.
pO surface 1 5 night ditto.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 123
r 8 day collections,
r 22 surface 1 11 niilit ditto.
Tow-nettin£?s 41 < r^ , i tj.^
^ I T n I f r I'i' day ditto.
(_19 under-surface <^ •'
L 5 night ditto.
This was the most common of the Saphirines in the ' Buccaneer ' collections.
Saphirina serrata, Brady.
188.3. Saphirina serrata, Brady, Report Cliall. Copep. p. 125, pi. xlix. figs. 1, 2.
Habitaf. Station 9, 25 fathoms, January 11th (day collection). Lat. 1 55' 5" N., long.
5' 55' 5" E., 200 fathoms, January 22nd (day collection). Station 23, surl'ace and 10
fathoms, February 5th (day collections). Lat. 5' 40' 8" S., long. 11" 33' 4" E., surface,
February 19th (day collection), &c.
This species occurred in 20 tow-nettings, 10 of which were surface and 10 under-surface
gatherings. The surface comprised 5 day and 5 night collections ; the under-surface 8 day
and 2 night collections, as shown in the formula : —
r
i 5
Tow-nettings 20 <[ ^ - .
tlO under-surface 1 8 day ditto.
I 2 night ditto.
The under-surface tow-nettings included one at 3 fathoms, three at 10 fathoms, one at
15 fathoms, two at 20 fathoms, one at 25 fathoms, one at 50 fathoms, and one at 260
fcxthoms. The distinct, though finely serrate, margins of the abdominal segments
(except the first) in the female constitute one of the most prominent characters of the
species. S. serrata was one of the less common of the Saphirines in the collection.
Saphirina opalixa, Dana.
1852. Saphirina opalina, Daua, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exp. p. 1254, pi. Ixxxviii. fig. 4.
1860. Saphirina Thomsoni, Lubbock, Trans. Linn. Soc. vol. xxiii. p. 18(i, pl. xxix. figs. 22, 23.
1883. Saphirina opalina, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 12G, pl. xlix. figs. 3-G.
Habitat. Station 9, 25 fathoms, January 10th (day collection). Off' Sao Thome Island
(lat. 0 34' K., long. G 30' 4" £.), 10 fathoms, January 23rd (day collection). Station 23,
20 fathoms, February 5tli (day collection). Lat. T 38' S., long. 12 3' 3" E., surface,
February 9th (night collection), etc.
This Saphirine was obtained in 5 surface and 8 under-surface tow-nettings. The
8 under-surface gatherings comprised two at 10 fathoms, one at 15 fathoms, two at
20 fathoms, and two at 25 fathoms. The annexed formula shows the number of day and
night collections : —
f 1 day collection.
5 surface
Tow-nettings 13^ , . , "^
j ^ =uxxa^^ ^ ^ ^.gj^^ collections.
^'^ ^IS under-surface I ^ day ditto.
1 3 niojht ditto.
This species was readily distinguished from other Saphirines by the peculiar form of
the very short caudal stylets.
16*
124i MK. T. SCOTT ON EXTOMOSTRACA
Saphirina opaca, Lubbock.
1856. Saphirina opaca, Lubbock, Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. iv. p. 27, pi. v. figs. 9-11.
1883. Saphirina opaca, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 127, pi. xlix. figs. 14-17.
Habitat. Lat. 3' 58' N., long. 3' 42' W., 25 fathoms, January 13th (day collection).
Off Sao Thome Island (lat. 0" 46' 6" N., long. 6^ 22' E.), 10 fathoms, January 23rd
(day collection). Off the Gaboon River (lat. 0' 22' 8" N., long. 8^^ 16' 7" E.), surface,
January 28th (two night collections). Station 23, 10 fathoms, February 5th (day
collection) .
This comparatively large species was obtained in 18 tow-nettings, 7 of which were
surface and 11 under-surface gatherings. The under-surface tow-nettings included one
at 2| fathoms, six at 10 fathoms, one at 15 fathoms, one at 20 fathoms, one at 25 fathoms,
and one at 30 fathoms. 1 surface and 9 under-surface gatherings were collected during
the day, Avhile 6 surface and 2 under-surface were night collections, as shown by the
annexed formula : —
r 1 day collection.
T ff iQ ( ^ surface | q ^^^^^ collections.
Tow-nettmgs 18 -^ ^- »
(.11 under-surface P ^% ^^i^to.
( 2 night ditto.
The large size, elongate form, and the produced inner angle of the caudal stylets serve
to distinguish this from most of the other Saphirines in the collection . A few specimens
carried ovisacs.
Saphirina splendens, Dana.
1852. Saphirina splendens, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1246, pi. Ixxxvii. fig. 9.
1883. Saphirina splendens, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 127, pi. xlix. figs. 11-13.
Rahitat. Station 3, 25 fathoms, January 2nd (day collection). Lat. 4 31' 6" N., long.
6' 4' 44" W., 50 fathoms, January 11th (day collection). Off the Gaboon lliver (lat. 0^
22' 8" N., long. 8 25' E.), surface, January 29th (night collection). Station 23, surface
and 10 fathoms, February 5th (day collection). Lat. 7° 38' S., long. 12' 3' 3" E., surface,
February 9th (night collection), &c.
Saphirina splendens occurred in 16 tow-nettings — 6 surface and 10 under-surface.
The surface tow-nettings comprised 3 day and 3 night collections, the under-surface
9 day collections and 1 niglit collection. The under-surface tow-nettings included one
at 2 1 fathoms, four at 10 fathoms, one at 15 fathoms, two at 25 fathoms, and two at
50 fathoms. The annexed formula shows the number of day and night collections : —
{3 day collections.
o night ditto.
xuvv -lie L tings xu ^ ®
.10 under-surface j ^ ^^^y ditto.
1 night collection.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 125
Saphirina metallina, Dana. (PI. XII. fig. 4.)
1852. Saphirina metallina, Daua, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1242^ pi. Ixxxvii. fig. 5.
1860. Saphirina cylindrica, Lubbock, Trans. Linn. Soc. vol. xxiii. p. 184, pi. xxix. figs 13-15.
1883. Saphirina metallina, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 128, pi. 1. figs. 11-17.
Rahitat. Station 2, 5, 25, and 50 fathoms, January 1st (night collections). Station 3,
100 fathoms, January 2ncl (day collection). Lat. 1" 55' 5" N., long. 5' 55' 5" E., 30, 00, and
360 fathoms, January 22nd (day collections). Station 23, surface, one day and one night
collection ; also in one at 20, 85, 135, and 235 fathoms, February 5tli, &c. (day collections).
Saphirina metallina occurred in 29 tow-nettings ; only 4 of these were surface, the
other 25 being under-surface and ranging in de[)th from 5 to 360 fathoms. The surface
gatherings comjirised 1 da}- and 3 night collections, and the under-surface 19 day and 6
night collections, as shown by the annexed formida : —
J 1 day collection.
rr .,• on/ ^^^^"^'^^^ 1 3 night collections.
Tow-nettmgs 29 < ^ o
I 25 under-surface [ ^^ "^""^ ^^"«-
i 6 night ditto.
The form of the caudal stylets in this species makes it readily distinguished from all
other Saphiriues. A peculiar appendage of the caudal stylets is, by deep staining, brought
prominently into view. The outline of the appendage may be perceived without staining
by observing the ditfraction of light around its edges, but it is only by allowing the speci-
men to be well soaked in the stain (Kleinenberg's hsematoxylin does very well to stain
with) that the appendage can be seen to advantage. It is then observed to possess a
narrow oval outline with an acute apex ; a thickened part extends from base to apex
like the midrib of a leaf. The whole appendage has thus the appearance of a seta
possessing delicate wing-like expansions. Such a leaf -like aj)pendage {cerGophyllnm)
has not been noticed in any other species of Saphiri)ia in the 'Buccaneer' collections.
These cercophylla probably enable the animal to move with greater rapidity through the
water, and thus to be more successful in the struggle for existence. By possessing greater
celerity in its movements it would be able to escape more readily from its enemies and
be more certain of success in attacking its prey. Whether the cercophylla are used as
an additional motive-power or not is at present conjectural, but the study of the animal
in the living state should tend to throw some light on the use of these curious organs.
Saphiiiina sinuicalda, Brady.
1883. Saphirina sinuicauda, Brady, Report Chall. Copep. p. 129, pi. xlix. figs. 7-10.
Rahitat. Lat. 23 4 9" N., long. 5° 22' 2" E., 20 fathoms, January 21st (night collection)'.
Station 21., surface, February 6th (day collection).
This was one of the rarest of the Saphiriues observed in the ' Buccaneer ' collections,
and is distinguished from the other species by the form of the inner branch of the second
swimming-foot and of the caudal lamellse. Only two or three specimens in all were
obtained.
126 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Genus Saphirinella, Glaus.
Saphirinella, Claus, Die freilebendea Oopepodeu, 1863.
Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock).
1856. Saphirina sttjlifera, Lubbock, Trans. Ent. Soc. vol. iv. p. 28, pi. iv. figs. 9, 10.
1866. Saphirinella stylifera, Claus, Die Copepoden-Fauna von Nizza, p. 17, pi. i. figs. 13, 14.
Habitat. Station 2, 5, 25, and 50 fatboms, January 1st (uigbt collections). Station 3,
25, 50, and 100 fatboms day tow-nettings, and 50 fatboms nigbt tow-netting, January 2nd.
Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5' 55' 5" E., 10, 20, 30, 60, 260, aud 3C0 fatboms, January 22nd
(day collections). Station 23, surface, 20, 85, 185, and 235 fatboms, February 5tb
(day collections).
Saphirinella stylifera was obtained in 58 tow-nettings, 37 of wbicb were day and 21
Avere nigbt collections. 47 of tbe collections were under-surface, tbe otbers were surface
gatberings, as sbown by tbe annexed formula : —
j 1 dav collections,
r 11 surface | 7 nigbt ditto.
Tow-nettings 58 <^ oq i y,,
1-17 under-surface ( 33 day ditto.
1 11 nigbt ditto.
Tbe under-surface tow-nettings included gatherings from 5 to 360 fatboms, in nearly
all of wbicb Saphirinella was more or less frequent.
Many specimens of Saphirinella were obtained, but tbey all appeared to belong to the
one species Saphirinella stylifera (Lubbock). Very few specimens were observed in tbe
' Challenger ' collections, which is the more remarkable considering the number of
gatberings and the extensive area represented.
Note. — Saphirinella : It has been sbown by Dr. Giesbrecbt that Saphirinella is only
tbe male form of Copilia, and that Saphirinella stylifera, Lubbock, is the male of Copilia
mirabllis, Dana.
Saphirella, nov. gen. (Provisional name.)
Anterior antenna? nearly as in Saphirina, 5-jointed. Posterior antennae 3-jointcd.
Mandibles stout, each bearing a strong terminal conical tooth, serrate on both margins,
and a stout plumose terminal spine. Maxilla? broadly subquadrangular and furnished
with a few terminal seta?. Posterior foot-jaws stout, 3-jointed, and armed with a mode-
rately strong terminal claw. The swimming-feet arc 2-branched, each branch consists of
a single broadly foliaceous joint ; fifth pair rudimentary or obsolete.
Saphirella abyssicola, n. sp. (PI. XIII. figs. 57, 58; PL XIV. figs. 5-10.)
Length 1'2 mm. Cephalothorax robust ; the first segment, which is about as long as
broad, is fully two-fifths tbe length of the whole animal ; the triangular postero-distal
angles of tbe second segment are extended backwards to near tbe end of tbe fourth
TROM THE GULP OF GUINEA. 1:27
segment. Anterior antennse nearly as in Saphlrina, short, stout, 5-jointed, the third
and fourth joints shorter tlian the others ; tlie proportional lengths of the joints are
shown l)y the annexed formula : —
12. V.K 10.8 . 12
1 2 3 4~5 ■
Tlie posterior antennae consist of three nearly equal joints, and are furnished with one
or two marginal and a number of apical setae, two of the apical setae and one subapical
lieing strongly curved, long, and spiniform (PI. XIII. fig. 58). Mandibles stout, armed
with a strong terminal conical tooth ; serrate on l)oth edges, and a stout plumose spine ;
there are also two stout subapical plumose setre (PI. XIV. fig. 6). Maxillse broadly
subquadrangular, bearing one submarginal and a few terminal setie (PI. XIV. fig. 7).
The basal joint of the anterior foot-jaws is considerably dilated, and is provided with
two stout plumose spines on the inner distal angle ; the last joint is small, about once
and a half longer than broad, and Ijears four spines on its truncate ajjex (PL XIV.
fig. 8). Posterior foot-jaw stout, 3-jointed, the last joint very small and furnished
with a moderately strong and nearly straight claw and a long, spiniform, plain seta ;
the first joint bears three setse on its inner distal angle, and there are two setse near
the middle of the second joint (PI. XIV. fig. 9). Swimming-feet stout, 2-branched;
each branch consists of a single broadly foliaceous joint ; the outer liranch of the first
pair carries four stout dagger-shaped marginal and subterminal spines, serrate on both
edges, and three terminal plumose setae ; the inner branch carries three similar spines,
two plain apical setae, and a seta near the base of the inner margin. The second pair
of feet are like the first, but the three dagger-shaped spines on the inner branch are
replaced by plumose setae. Only two pairs of feet were observed ; the others wer(^
wautiu!?. The last segment of the abdomen is about twice and a half lon<rer than
l)road. Caudal stylets very short, each bearing a long, slender, sabre-like spine and a
few very small setae.
Habitat. Lat. 1" 55' 5" X., long. 5° 55' 5" E., in a tow-net gathering from 260 fathoms,
collected Januarv 22nd.
Section III. SIPHONOSTOMA, Thorell.
Family ARTOTEOGIDJE.
Cyclopicera, Brady (1872j.
? Cyclopicera lata, Brady. (PI. XIII. figs. 25-30.)
1868. Ascomyzon echinicola, Norman, Brit. Assoc. Report, p. 300.
1872. Cyclopicera lata, Brady, Nat. Hist. Trans. Nortliumb. and Durham^ vol. iv. p. 433, pi. wm.
figs. 3-8.
1880. Cyclopicera lata, Brady, Mon. Brit. Copep. vol. iii. p. 56, pi. Ixxxix. fig. VI; pi. xc. figs. 11 -Ul
Length -7 mm. Body subrotund ; first body-segment shorter than broad and about
128 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
equal to half the entire length of the animal, exclusive of caudal stylets ; forehead
hroadlv rounded. Anterior antennae slender, shorter than the first hody-segment,
20-jointed; the second to the ninth joints and also the eighteenth and twentieth,
which are all of nearly equal length, are shorter than the others, as shown in the
annexed formula : —
10. 4. 3. 3. 3. 2. 2. 3. 4. 4. 7. 7. 7. 6. 7. 8. 10. 4. 6. 3
1 2345678 9 101112 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20
An olfactory filament springs from the end of the seventeenth joint. Posterior
antennae and mouth-organs nearly as in Artoti^ogus Boeckii, except that the mandihular
stylets are considerably longer and their terminal setoe shorter ; the terminal claw of the
posterior foot-jaws is also longer in the ' Buccaneer ' specimens. The five pairs of
swimming-feet also resemble those of Artotrogus Boeckii. In the fourth pair (fig. 26)
a long, stout, plumose seta springs from the extero-distal angle of the first basal joint,
and the outer distal angle of the second joint of the inner branch is bidentate. The
abdomen consists of three segments, and the caudal stylets, which are about three times
as long as broad, are equal in length to the last abdominal segment.
Habitat. Accra, in a shore gathering, collected January IGth. One or two specimens
only were obtained.
Artotrogus, Boeck (1859).
Artotrogus (pars) and Asterocheres, Boeck, Tvendc nye parasitiske Krebsdyr, 1859.
Ascomyzon, Thorell, Om Knistaceer i Ascidier, 1859.
? Artotrogus abyssicolus, n. sp. (PL XII. figs. 5-9 ; PL XIV. figs. 11-18.)
Female. Length 1"1 mm. Cephalothorax robust ; the first segment, which is con-
siderably dilated and equal to about four-ninths the length of the entire animal, is
anteriorly three-lobed ; the two side-lobes are i-ounded, but the middle one is broadly
triangular ; the last thoracic segment is very small and scarcely so broad as the first
segment of the abdomen. The abdomen is elongate and slender, and nearly of equal
breadth throughout ; first segment about equal to the length of the next two together,
the remaining segments become gradually shorter. Caudal stylets about half the
length of the last abdominal segment, and furnished with five moderately long setae.
Anterior antennce short, S-jointed, the last joint longer than any of the others ; a
long sensory filament springs from the end of the sixth joint ; the relative lengths of the
joints are shown in the formula : —
27 . 12 . 6 . 12 . 8 . IS . 10 . 34
T 2 3 4 "5 6 7 8"
Posterior antenna? 4-jointed, the second and third joints subequal and longer than the
first or fourth ; the last joint bears three spines — two terminal, one of which is moderately
long and one short, and a marginal spine ; a small 1-jointed secondary branch springs
from near the end of the second joint. The mandible consists of an elongate basal
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 129
joint furnished with two long, slendei', terminal sette. The first joint of the anterior
foot-jaws is stout and without sjjiucs or settle ; the apical portion of the foot-jaw is long
and slender, the proximal half being about four times longer than broad and fijiely
ciliate on the inner aspect, while the distal half forms a strongly curved claw ; no
articulation was observed between the claw and tlie broadened basal part. Posterior
foot-jaw 4-jointed, second joint large, third and fourth much narrower and shorter;
the second, third, and fourth arc each provided with a small spine on the inner aspect;
terminal claw equal to fully twice the length of the last joint, stout and slightly curved.
Swimming-feet nearly as in Artotrogtis (PI. XIV. figs. 17, IS). No fifth pair were
observed. Siphon as in Artotrogns.
RaUtat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., in a tow-net gathering from 360 fathoms,
collected January 22nd. Station 23, in a tow-net gathering from 235 fathoms, collected
February 5th.
Several sjiecimens of what may be the male (? immature) of this species occurred in
the same gatherings ; they diff^ered in the following points : — Body elongate ovate ;
abdomen long and very slender, and aj)parcntly 6-jointcd, the first segment lieing
distinctly constricted in the middle (PI. XII. fig. 9). The anterior antenna? consist of
four moderately stout, short joints, and an extremely long, slender, apical part without
articulations (PI. XII. fig. 6). The approximate proportional lengths of the basal joints
and long apical part are as follows : —
25 ■ 8 ■ 8 . 4 . 270.
12 3 4 5
The posterior foot-jaws are more slender (PI. XII. fig. 8). All the other appendages
closely agree with the foregoing description.
Caligus, Mliller.
Caligus (?) Thtmni, Dana. (PI. XIV. fig. 21.)
1853. Calii/us Tliijmni, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Expecl. p. 1353, pi. xciv. fig. 3 ff.
HaMtat. Station 9, in a tow-net gathering from 25 fathoms, collected about midday,
January 10th. One specimen only.
This specimen, which is doubtfully referred to Caligus Thymni, Dana, differs from that
species chiefly in the form and comparative length of the posterior part of the abdomen.
In the ' Buccaneer ' specimen this part is somewhat narrower and longer proportionally
than Dana's figure represents Caligus Thymni to be.
Caligus Murrayanus, n. sp. Provisional name. (PL XIV. fig. 19.)
Length 3 mm. Prontal plate produced and much narrower anteriorly. Fourth pair
of feet elongate and rather slender. The first abdominal (genital) segment in the
female, Avhicli becomes wider posteriorly, is about ouc-and-a-half times longer than it is
broad at the middle, and equal to aloout half the length of the cephalothorax. The
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 17
130 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
posterior part of the abdoineu, exclusive of caudal stylets, is about half as long as the
genital segment, and the breadth less than half the length. A small sucker-like
appendage springs from each side of the median ventral line and at the posterior end of
the genital segment. Caudal stylets very short.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, during the afternoon of
February 15th. One specimen only obtained.
The outline of the frontal plate, in this species, somewhat resembles an equilateral
triangle, from the aj)ical part of which a portion equal to about two fifths of the height
has been cut otf, while the sucker-disks are situated near the middle of what remains
of each side. The species is named in compliment to Dr. Murray of the ' Challenger '
Expedition, who has done so much to foster and encourage the study of marine
zoology.
Caligus bengoensis, n. sp. Provisional name. (PL XIV. fig. 20.)
Length about 2*4 mm. Prontal plate about one fifth of the length of the cephalo-
thorax, narrower anteriorly. Sucker-disks forming almost a complete circle. The
length of the genital segment of the abdomen is about equal to one-and-one-third times
its breadth ; the following segment is shorter than broad, and in length equal to about
half the breadth of the genital segment ; the last abdominal segment is longer than the
preceding one, and about as broad as long. Caudal stylets half as long as the last
abdominal segment. The fourth pair of feet are moderately stout.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, but not the same as that in
which Caligus Murrayanus was obtained.
Caligtjs DUBiiTS, n. sp. Provisional name. (PI. XIV. fig. 22.)
'Female. Length 3"G mm. Porehead broadly rounded, sucker-disks comparatively
shallow. Cephalothorax equal to about four sevenths of the entire length of the animal.
The genital segment, which becomes wider towards the distal end, is about as long as
the remaining portion of the abdomen, including caudal stylets ; its breadth at the distal
end is equal to about three fourths the length, and the postero-lateral angles are rounded.
The remaining portion of the abdomen, the length of which is about equal to the
posterior end of the genital segment, is three times longer than broad ; no articulations
were observed in this part of the abdomen. The length of the caudal stylets is equal
to twice the breadth, and each is furnished with three moderately short plumose setse.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in two surface tow-net gatherings, collected, one on the
13th and one on the 15th of February ; also in a surface tow-net gathering collected off
Appi, January 18th.
NoGAGUS, Leach.
NoGAGUS vALiDUs, Dana. (PI. XIV. fig. 23.)
1853. Nuyayus validus, Dana, Crust. Expl. Exped. p. 13G3, pi. xciv. fig. 9 a-h.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 131
Habitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long 5' 55' 5" E., in a tow-net gathering from 30 fathoms,
collected January 22nd. One specimen only was obtained.
Hessella, Brady.
Hessella cylindrica, Brady.
1883. Hessella cyl'indnca, Brady, ' Cliallcnger' Copepoda, p. 13G, pi. Iv. figs. 9-13.
18G0. ? Baculux elnnyatus, Lubbock, Trans. Linn. Soc. vol. xxiii. p. 190, pi. xxix. fig. 40.
Habitat. Station 3, in a tow-net gathering from 25 fathoms, collected January 2nd.
Only one sjiecimen of this interesting species was obtained.
This appears to be the Baculus elongatm, Lubbock, described by Sir John Lubbock
in his paper " On some Oceanic Entomostraca collected by Caj)tain Toynbee," and
imblished in vol. xxiii. of the Transactions of the Linnean Society. If my con-
jecture is right, Sir John Lubbock's name must take precedence of that of Dr. Brady.
Incert.e Sedis.
PONTOPSYLLUS BLONGATTJS, U. g. et sp. (PI. XIV. figS. 24-30.)
Length 2'23 mm. (1-llth of an inch). Body cylindrical ; first segment four sevenths
of the whole length of the animal and equal to twice the combined length of the remaining
three segments, which are subcqual. Abdomen very short, composed of four segments ;
the two intermediate segments, which are of about equal length, are shorter than the
first or fourth. Caudal stylets rudimentary and furnished with a moderately stout
curved plumose terminal seta and three small marginal ones ; the integument of the last
abdominal segment is covered with minute cilia, and the terminal seta of each of the
caudal stylets is curved inwards (fig. 24). Anterior antenniB short, 5-jointed, bearing a
few scattered hairs ; the anterior distal angle of the basal joint is provided with a long
plain seta that reaches beyond the apex of the antenna. The proportional lengths of the
joints are as follows : —
27 -IS . 15. 15 . 18
T 2 3 4 5 ■
The posterior antennae are 2-jointed and very short and stout ; a strong curved claw,
articulated to the exterior half of the truncate apex and opposed by a stout pointed
tooth, forms a powerful grasping-organ (fig. 20). Mandible and maxiUge rudimentary ;
the first consists of a simple, somewhat stylet-shaped appendage, the other of two strong
hooked spines attached to a stout 1-jointed basal part (figs. 27 a, b). Posterior foot-jaws
large ; the dilated basal joint carries an elongate, slender, apical appendage, the distal end
of which is clothed with fine cilia, and, becoming gradually attenuated, terminates in a
small spiral coil of about one-and-a-half turns, as shown in figure. The four pairs of
swimming-feet are all similar and consist of two short 2-jointed branches ; the exterior
distal angles of the joints of the outer branches are furnished with stout dagger-shaped
spines, finely serrate on both edges ; the broad terminal spines, which are more than twice
132
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
the length of the branches from which they spring, are plain on the inner and serrate
on the outer margin ; the inner branches have no terminal spine ; both branches are
provided with several long plumose setse (fig. 29).
Sabitat. Lat. 1° 55' 5" N., long. 5° 55' 5" E., in a gathering from 360 fathoms, collected
January 22nd. One specimen only was obtained.
A form that may be an immature stage of the foregoing was obtained in a surface
tow-net gathering from Loanda Harbour, collected February 15th, and is represented by
fig. 58. The anterior antennre are 2-jointed ; the posterior foot-jaws are large and well-
developed ; the siphon is elongate, with a flattened sucker-like disk at the extremity
(fig. 30)
This form is closely analogous to the immature stage of Caligus, formerly described
as a distinct genus under the name of Chalimus.
Part II.
CLADOCERA and OSTRACODA.
INDEX OF GENERA AND SPECIES.
Asterope, PhUippi 140
squamiger, n. sp 140
Bairdia, M'Coy 136
inornata, n. sp 136
Cypria, Zenker 134
atlantica, n. sp 134
Cythere, Miiller 137
multicava, n. sp 137
radula, Brady . 138
rimosa, n. sp 138
sculptilis 137
thalassiea, n. sp 138
venusta, n. sp 138
Cytherella, Jones 144
Page
Cytherella africana, n. sp 144
pumilla, n. sp 144
Cytheropteron, G. 0. Sars 139
trilobitos, Brady 139
Cytherura, G. 0. Sars 139
simulans, n. sp 139
Evadno, Loven 133
Nordmanni, Loven 133
Halocypris, Dana 141
aculeata, n. sp 142
atlantica, Bana 141
brevirostris, Dana 141
elongata, ii. sp 141
Page
Halocypris punica, n. sp 143
torosa, n. sp 142
Penilia, Dana 132
orientalis, Da^ia 132
Phlyctenopliora, Brady 135
africana, n. sp 135
Pontocjpris, G. 0. Sars 136
subreniformis, n. sp 136
trigonella, G. 0. Sars. . . 136
SarsieUa, No7-man 140
Murrayana, u. sp 140
Xestoleberis, G. 0. Sars 139
margaritea, Brady 139
CLADOCERA.
Cladocera were exceedingly rare in regard to the number of species observed, only
two species having been obtained in the whole of the ' Buccaneer ' collections. They
FEOM THE GULF OF GUIXEA, 133
represented, however, two widely prevailing groups — the Calt/ptomera and Ghjnomera ;
the fii'st is confined almost exclusively to fresh and brackish water, while species belonging
to the other are to be found in fresh water and also in the open sea.
The following are the two species referred to : —
CALYPTOMEBA.
Family PENILID^, Dana.
Genus Penilia, Dana (1853).
Penilia orientalis, Dana.
1853. PenUia orientalis, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1270, pi. Ixxxix. fig. 3 a-e.
SaUtat. Loanda Harbour, in three surface tow-net gatherings, collected February 15th.
A number of specimens were observed.
GYMNOMEBA.
Family POLYPHEMIDiE, Baird.
Genus Evadne, Loven.
EvADNE NoEDMANNi, Loven.
This species was obtained in a number of the tow-net gatherings.
OSTPvACODA.
Comparatively few Ostracoda were obtained in the ' Buccaneer ' collections. The
Ostracoda, with the exception of Halocypris and a few others, live among the weed, or
on the sand and mud at the bottom of the water, and can be captured only by the dredge
or other implement suited for collecting bottom material ; dead shells of Ostracods,
however, may be frequently obtained by carefully examining the sand or other debris on
the shore. As, therefore, the ' Buccaneer ' collections consisted chiefly of tow-net
gatherings, pelagic species, as Halocypris, were the only forms observed in. all but a very
few of the gatherings.
Several species of Cythere, as well as one or two of other genera belonging both to the
Cypridse and Cytheridse, were obtained in a surface gathering from a lagoon at Sao
Thome Island, in another from Loanda Harbour, and in a third collected off the mouth
of the River Congo.
1^- ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
One of the most interesting captures was an Ostracod closely allied to Cypria exsculpta
(Fischer), which in this Report is named provisionally C]jpna atlantica; it was
obtained in the gathering collected off the mouth of the River Congo, referred to above,
at about 40 miles from land. It is well known to students of the Entomostraca that
several species of the Cypridae, as, for example, Cypria ophthalmica (Jurine), Cypris
prasina, Fischer, Candona Candida (Milller), &c., though usually or frequently obtained
in fresh water, are nevertheless occasioually obtained also in water more or less brackish,
but have not been known to occur in the open sea, except as dead shells ; it is therefore
interesting to find a species closely resembling a freshwater Cy^ma living in the sea so
many miles from land.
It is possible that the fresh water poured into the sea by the River Congo may extend
to a distance of 40 miles or more from land before it becomes thoroughly mingled with the
water of the Atlantic, and may thus form a suitable hahUat for a species which possibly
would not be able to Live in pure sea-water. Whether this be tbe correct explanation
of the occurrence of a Cypria so far out at sea, or not, it is a subject of some interest as
bearing on the distribution of species.
It may he stated in connexion with this that several surface tow-net gatherings were
collected off the mouth of the Congo, and within a few miles of each other, but the
Cypria was observed only in the one mentioned under the description of the species.
Though the Ostracoda described in this Report be comparatively few in number, they
nevertheless include representatives of three out of the four principal Groups, viz. : —
the Podocopa, the Myodocopa, and the Platycopa. The following are the descriptions
of species obtained belonging to these three Groups : —
I. PODOCOPA.
Family CYPRID^.
Cypria, Zenker (1854).
(?) Cypkia atlantica, n. sp. (PI. XIV. figs. 31-33 ; PI. XV. figs. 16, 20, 21, 25.)
Shell compressed ; seen from the side, the dorsal margin is considerably arched,
hio-hest and somewhat angular in front of the middle ; the dorsal margin slopes gently
backwards from the highest part in a nearly straight line till it joins the broadly curved
posterior margin ; the front slojie has a greater declivity and is very slightly curved, and
niero-es in the boldly rounded anterior margin ; ventral margin nearly straight. Greatest
height equal to two-thirds of the length. Outline seen from above ovate ; sides evenly
rounded, widest behind the middle ; greatest width equal to about seven sixteenths of
the leno'th ; extremities acutely angular, but more so in front than behind ; the sides
also converge more gradually towards the anterior extremity than they do posteriorly.
Surface of shell ornamented with impressed reticulate lines, having the interspaces
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 135
covered with minute clots that appear to have a linear arrangement when viewed iu
certain positions. Length of shell '61 mm. (l-41st of an inch). Antennules 7-
jointed, hasal joint large, the others small ; the formula shoAv s the relative lengths of the
joints : —
32 . 10 ■ 11 . 8 ■ 7 . 6 . 9
1.2.3.4.5.6.7'
The last tw^o or three joints are provided with several long plain sette ; there are also a
few scattered sette on the other joints. Antennae 4-jointed; the proportional lengths
of the joints are as follows : —
10 ■ 14 ■ 10 . 4
1.2.3.4'
Pive long and nearly equal setse spring from the end of the second joint ; the terminal
claws reach only to about the middle of the setse. Post-abdomen moderately stout,
armed at the apex with two strong, curved, and nearly equal claws, and a small seta ; a
small seta also sj)rings from near the middle of the lower margin of the post-abdomen.
Sabitat. Lat. 5° 53' 0" S., long. 11 31' 1" E., in a surface tow-net gathering collected
11.30 P.M., February 18th. (Off the mouth of the Ptiver Congo, about 40 miles from
land.)
A considerable number of specimens w'ere obtained. The occiu'rence in the open sea
of a species so closely related to a freshwater Cijpria is of interest as forming another
link connecting the truly freshwater with the truly marine Ostracoda.
Pigure 33, PI. XIV., is that of an immature specimen.
Phltctenophora, Brady (1S80).
Phlyctenophora africana, n. sp. (PI. XIV. figs. 31, 35 ; PI. XV. figs. 17-19.)
Shell elongate ovate ; seen from the side the dorsal margin forms a depressed arch,
rather highest in front of the middle ; ventral margin sinuated in front, gently
convex behind ; anterior extremity somewhat attenuate and evenly rounded ; posterior
margin slightly produced and angular below the middle ; greatest height equal to five
tAvelfths of the length. The outline seen from above is compressed ovate, widest in the
middle ; greatest width a little more than a third of the length ; sides tapering similarly
and evenly to both extremities, which are subacute. Length 1 mm. (l-25th of an inch).
Antennules 7-jointed ; relative lengths of the joints nearly as in the formula : —
22 . 5 . 5 . .5 . 6 . 4 . 4
12 3 4 5 6 7'
The last joint bears a moderately stout and long apical spine ; the other joints are more
or less setiferous; setse plain. Anteimse 6-jointed, sparingly setiferous ; the first three
joints large, the last three small, as shown by the relative lengths of the joints given in
the formula : —
17 . 16 . 17 . 4 ■ 7 . 3
1 2 3 4 5 6'
236 MR, T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTRACA
A fascicle of about six short seise springs from the side and near the distal end of the
third joint, while the penultimate joint carries one spine, and the last joint two
moderately long claw-like spines. Post-abdomen short, stout, and armed with two
strong terminal claws, setiferous on the lower distal half, and a few small setse.
Babitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected February 13th,
Several specimens were obtained.
PoNTOCYPRis, G. O. Sars (1865).
PoNTOCTPRis TRiGONELLA, G. O. Sars. (PI. XIV. figs. 36, 37.)
1865. Pontocypris trigonella, G. O. Sars, Oversigt af Norges Marine Ostrac. p. 16.
1889. Pontocypris trigonella, Brady and Normau, Mou. M. & F.-w. Ostrac. of the N. Atlantic and
N.W. Europe, p. 109, pi. xxii. figs. 18-25, pi. x.xiii. fig. 6.
Sabitat. Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering from a shore-lagoon,
collected January 27th. One specimen only was obtained.
(?) Pontocypris subreniformiSjU. sp. Provisional name. (PI. XIV. figs. 38, 39.)
Outline of the shell seen from the side subreniform ; dorsal margin considerably
arched ; extremities similarly and somewhat obliquely rounded ; ventral margin slightly
concave ; greatest height at the middle scarcely equal to four ninths of the length.
Seen from above oblong ovate, widest at the middle, tapering at the sides from the
middle to each end in nearly straight lines; extremities obtusely pointed. Greatest
width equal to rather more than one third the length. Length 58 mm.
Sabitat. In the same gathering with the last.
Family BAIRDIID^.
Bairdia, M'Coy (1814).
Bairdia inornata, n. sp. (PI. XIV. figs. 40, 41.)
Viewed laterally the dorsal margin of the shell is boldly arcuate ; highest a little
behind the middle ; at the highest the dorsal margin is obtusely angular, and from
thence it slopes rapidly downwards on both sides, but more so behind than in front, till
it merges in the evenly rounded extremities ; ventral margin gently sinuated ; greatest
height equal to two-thirds of the length. The outline of the shell seen from above is
compressed ovate ; greatest width slightly behind the middle and equal to about five
twelfths of the length ; the sides curve regularly towards both ends ; extremities sub-
acute; surface of valves smooth. Length -7 mm.
Babitat. Lat. 5° 53' 0" S., long. 11 31' 1" E. ; in a surface tow-net gathering collected
at 11.30 P.M., February 18th. One specimen only obtained : it was in the same gathering
with Cypria atiantica, already described, and which was taken oflP the mouth of the
River Congo, at about 40 miles from land.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 137
Pamily CYTHEEID/E.
Cythere, Miiller (1785).
Cytheue mtjlticava, n. sp. (PL XIV. figs. 42, 43; PI. XV. figs. 13, 15.)
Shell elongate, rather tumid ; seen from the side, dorsal margin highest and bluntly
angular in front of the middle ; thence it slopes gently backwards in a nearly
straight line to the rounded, obscurely crenate, posterior end ; anterior uiargin oblique,
interiorly rounded and crenulate, ilatteued al)ove, and sloping posteriorly upward to the
hinge-prominence. Heigiit rather less than half the length. As seen from above
oblong, sides nearly parallel, slightly gibbous in front; width about two fitths of the
length ; posterior extremity broadly rounded at the sides, centrally produced and trun-
cate ; anteriorly the valves taper gently to the obtusely pointed extremity. Shell
ornamented with numerous small circular depressions arranged in irregular lines.
Length '77 mm.
Antennules 6-jointed, first and second joints long, the others small ; their relative
lengths ai"e as follows : —
25 . 27 ■ 10 . 6 . 8 . 10
I 2 0 4~5 6'
A stout spine springs from the exterior distal angle of the third, fourth, and fifth, and
from the apex of the last joint.
First and third joints of the antennse elongate, subequal, about three times as long as
the second joint; last joint very small, aiKl furnished with two apical spines. A long,
hair-like appendage carried by the second joint is connected by a duct with a (?) poison-
gland situated at the base of the antennae.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a gathering collected February 13th. A few specimens
only were obtained.
Cytheue sculptilis, n. sp. (PL XIV. figs. 4f, 45.)
Shell : viewed laterally, the outline of the shell is broad and ol)liquely rounded in front,
narrow behind ; greatest height in front of the middle equal to fully half the length ;
dorsal margin forming a sinuous declivity towards the posterior end ; posterior extremity
subtruncate, somewhat produced below and bluntly dentate ; lower part of anterior
margin crenate or bluntly toothed, ventral margin shallow concave. Seen from above,
subquadrangular ; anterior end truncate ; sides subparallel, sinuated ; greatest width
scarcely equal to half or three sevenths of the length, constricted behind the middle,
gently rounded and converging posteriorly. Towards the posterior end the edges of the
valves become flattened and are produced backwards, and terminate in obliquely truncate
ends as in the figures. Length "54 mm.
Habitat. With the last in a surface tow-net gathering from a lagoon, Sao Thome
Island. One specimen only obtained.
second series. — zoology, vol. VI. 18
138 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Cythere radula, Brady.
Cijthere radula, Brady, Report on the ' Challenger ' Copepoda, p. 102, pi. xix. fig. 4 a, b.
Habitat. Lagoon, Silo Thome Island, in tlie same gathering with the last. A single
valve evidently belonging to Cythere radula was obtained, but was broken while being
examined.
Cythere rimosa, n. sp. (PL XIV. figs. i6, 47.)
Shell tumid; seen from the side the dorsal margin is highest behind the middle, thence
it slopes gently in a nearly straight line to the anterior end, but merges behind into the
boldly and somewhat obliquely rounded posterior margin ; front margin subtrancate,
the lower part of the shell slightly produced ; greatest height equal to fully half the
length. The outline seen from above subovate, sides nearly parallel, but somewhat
wider in front of the middle ; thence they converge in a gently rounded curve to the
posterior end, which is slightly emarginate; greatest width scarcely equal to half the
length. Posterior extremity subtriaugular, with the apex truncate. Surface of the
valve curiously sculptured, with flattened ridges arranged in irregular and more or less
oblique lines extending across the shell. Length -6 mm.
Habitat. Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected January
27th, also the same gathering with Gypria atlantica collected off the mouth of the river
Congo, at about 40 miles from land, February 18th.
Cythere thalassica, n. sp. (PI. XIV. tigs. 48, 49.)
Outline of shell, seen from the side, narrow, elliptical, highest at the middle ; greatest
height scarcely equal to half the length ; dorsal margin gently and evenly arched, ventral
margin nearly straight ; both extremities similarly and boldly rou.nded. Seen from above,
ovate, rather widest at the middle, width and height about equal; anteriorly the sides, which
are slightly rounded, converge gently towards the obtusely jiointed extremity ; posterior
end l)roadly and moderately convex. Surfaces of valves smooth. Length -85 mm.
Habitat. In a lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected
January 27th. One or two specimens only obtained.
Cythere venijsta, n. sp. (PI. XIV. figs. 50, 51.)
Shell, seen from the side, broadly eUiptieal ; greatest height behind the middle, scarcely
equal to half the length. The dorsal margin is slightly arcuate, middle portion forming
a nearly straight line, but gently curved in front to where it joins the boldly and evenly
rounded anterior extremity ; posterior margin moderately and regularly convex ; ventral
margin slightly concave. Seen from above the shell is broadly ovate, widest behind the
middle ; greatest width equal to five twelfths of the length ; sides evenly rovinded, con-
verging gently towards the anterior extremity, but more convex posteriorly ; extremities
bluntly angular ; valves somewhat unequal, the right being rather smaller than the left.
Surface of the valves ornamented with flattened and gently curved longitudinal ribs placed
PROM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 139
side by side, extending from the posterior extremity, but becoming obsolete towards the
anterior end, where they run out into shallow circular depressions ; the front margin is
marked with a number of impressed, short, radiating lines. Length -8 mm. (l-31st of
an inch).
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected February 13th.
One specimen only obtained.
This species closely resembles Cijtlicre costellata, lloemer, an ostracod obtained fossil
in the Tertiary deposits of England and also in France.
Xestolebeuis, G. O, Sars (1865).
Xestolebekis (?) MARGARiTEA (Brady).
18G5. Cytheridea margaritea, Brady, Trans. Zool. Soc. vol. v. p. 370, pi. Iviii. fig. 6, a, b.
1880. Xestokbtris margaritea, Brady, Report ou the ' Challenger ' Copepoda, p. 127, pi. xxx. fig. 2, a, h.
Habitat. Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected January
27th ; several species were obtained. 'IlhaXestoleberis now recorded, when viewed laterally,
differs from X. margaritea described and figured hi the ' Challenger ' Pi-eport in being
rather more pointed at the anterior end, but otherwise it seems to agree with that
species ; it also agrees with the figures of the same species in the ' Monograph of the
Marine and Fresh-water Ostracoda of the North Atlantic and North-western Europe,'
by Brady and Norman, ji. 246.
Cytherura, G. O. Sars.
Cytuerura simulans, n. sp. (PL XIV. figs. 52, 53.)
Shell, viewed laterally, subovate ; greatest height behind the middle equal to about
four ninths of the length ; dorsal margin moderately and evenly arched ; ventral margin
slightly concave ; beak subcentral, obtuse, more prominent than in Cytherura similis,
G. O. Sars, which the species now described somewhat resembles; anterior extremity
evenly rounded and slightly oblique ; the outline seen from above is subovate, widest
behind the middle ; width equal to the height ; sides flattened centrally, converging and
gently curved ; anterior subtruncate behind, with the middle part shortly produced to a
blunt pointed apex ; anterior extremity subacuminate. Length •16 mm.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected February 13th.
One specimen only obtained.
Cytheropteron, G. O. Sars (1865).
Cytheropteron trilobitis, Brady. (PI. XIV. figs. 51, 55.)
1880. Cytheropteron trilobitis, Brady, On Ostracoda collected by H. B. Brady in South Sea Islands,
Traus. R. S. E. vol. xxxv. pt. ii. p. 511, pi. iii. figs. 22, 23.
Habitat. In a lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a tow-net gathering, collected January 27.
Only a few valves of this species were obtained ; it differs very little from the ' Challenger '
specimen.
18*
140 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
II. 3IYOBOC0PA.
Family CYPEIDINID/E, Baird.
Genus Asterope, Philippi.
AsTEROPE SQUAMiGEE, D. sji. (PL XIV. figs. 56, 57 ; PI. XV. figs. 14, 22, 23, 26.)
Female. Shell, seen from the side, subrotundate, highest at the middle, convex and evenly
rounded in front; dorsal margin nearly straight; extremities evenly rounded; the
posterior curve slightly oblique, notch well defined, beak subacute, height equal to four
fifths of the length. Length 1-15 mm. Seen from above ovate, tumid, widest at the
middle ; width equal to tbree fifths of the length ; sides moderately and regularly convex ;
posterior extremity obtusely rounded ; valves slightly produced in the middle ; anterior
extremity emarginate. Surface of shell ornamented with small squamiferous markings.
Antennules 6-jointed and of moderate length, the second to the fifth joints subequal,
the last very small and furnished with several slender apical setfe and a slightly hooked
claw. Secondary branches of antenna) 3-jointcd, ; first and third joints short, the last
bearing a short seta at its apex. Pirst maxillse nearly as in Astero])e teres, Jones ; post-
abdomen armed with about six spines, the first large iiud serrate on the j)Osterior edge,
the next three shorter and plumose and apparently articulated near the l)ase, the others
very small.
Habitat. (?) Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected
during night, January 27th. Two specimens only.
Sarsiella, Norman, 1868.
Sarsiella Murrayana, n. sp. (PI. XIV. fig. 58 ; PL XV. figs. 24, 28, 29, 31.)
Male. Shell laterally compressed in front, tumid behind, seen from the side subrotund;
height equal to three fourths of the length ; dorsal margin slightly convex ; front margin
boldly rounded and continuous with the anterior end ; posterior extremity produced in
front into a blunt-pointed, triangular, beak-like process ; dorsal angle at the junction of
the posterioi" and dorsal margin rounded ; there is a small, tumid, triangular, tooth-like
process a little behind the dorsal angle (fig. 40). Surface of the shell covered with small
puncture-like markings.
Antennules 4-joiiited ; first joint elongate, second and third subequal and shorter than
the first; last joint fully three fourths the length of the preceding and furnished with
several apical setse of moderate length ; second joint of natatory branch rather longer
than the next two joints together ; third to the last joints small, subequal. Post-
abdomen armed with a long, powerful, terminal claw and four spines of varying length
on the posterior distal margin. Ovii'erous foot nearly as in Asterope Ilarice (Baird).
Length •93 mm.
Kahltal. Lagoon, Sao Thome Island, in a surface tow-net gathering collected during
night, January 27th. Two specimens only obtained.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 141
Family CONCHCECID.E.
Subfamily II A l o c Y p ii i N je, Daua.
Geuus IIalocypris, Dana (1853).
Halocypbis brevirostuis, Dana.
1853. Halocypris hrevirostr'ts, Dana, Crust. U.S. Expl. Exped. p. 1303, pi. xci. fig. 9, a-c.
Habitat. From the following-, among other localities : —
January .5th, lat. 5 58' 0" N., long. It' 10' 0" W., surface gatherings.
The first of these gatherings was collected in Lhe evening after dark, the others during the
day. The specimens observed in any of the gatherings were comparatively few in number.
Halocypris elongata, n. sp. (PL XV. figs. 1, 2, 27, 30.)
Shell, seen from the side, elongate, anterior extremity rounded below the notch and
continuous with the ventral margin ; ventral and dorsal margins nearly straight, dorsal
produced posteriorly so as to be considerably longer than the ventral ; posterior margin
oblique, nearly straight, forming an acute angle at its junction with the dorsal edge; the
ventral angle obtusely rounded ; shell highest posteriorly, greatest height fully one third
of the length. Length 3' 2 mm. Seen from above, elongate ovate, widest at the middle,
width equal to rather less than one third of the length ; from the middle the shell tapers
and becomes much compressed towards the posterior extremity, which is somewhat
obtuse ; anteriorly the width decreases more gradually to the base of the rostrum,
whence the valves rapidly converge to the sharp pointed extremity of the beak ; surface of
the valves smooth. The setre of the anterior antenna; of the female are four short and one
long ; the second joint is s(jmewhat shorter than that which precedes or follows ; the last
joint is very short. The distal part of the tentacle seems to be continuous with the basal
portion instead of sagittifoi'm as in Halocypris atlaiitica, Lubbock. Natatory branch of
the posterior antennie slender ; secondary branch small ; first joint somewhat dilated and
furnislied with two small spines; apical joint small, bearing five setae — two very small,
two elongate and reaching to near the extremity of the apical seta^ of the primary branch,
and one about half as lung.
Habitat. From several localities, among which arc the following : —
January lOtli, lat. 3" 0' 8" N., long. 7' 13' 0" W., 50 fathoms (Station 9).
20th, „ 3 55' 3" N., „ 4^ 7' 3" E., 30 fathoms.
22nd, „ 1' 55' 5" X., „ 6' 55' 5" E., 20, 30, and 35 fathoms.
February 5th, „ 4^ 20' 7" S., „ 10 1' 8" E., 20 and 30 fathoms (Station 23).
This species was not observed in any surface toAV-net gathering.
142 MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Haloctpeis torosa, n. sp. (PL XV. figs. 3, 4, 32, 35, 37.)
Shell tumid ; surface of valves finely reticulated. Seen from the side the dorsal margin
is nearly straight, slightly sinuate ; a sulcus begins near the middle of the dorsal margin
and passes obliquely backward across each valve ; the tumidity extends downward, anterior
to the sulcus, and overhangs the nearly straight ventral margin. A second, though
very shallow, groove is observed in some of the more robust specimens, between the sub-
central sulcus and the posterior extremity. Posterior margin truncate, dorsal angle
slightly produced; at the anterior end the ventral margin rises obliquely in a nearly
straight line and merges in the small rounded angle below the notch. The beak is a
hood-like process with broad overhanging sides. Shell highest at the posterior end ;
height equal to nearly half the length ; length 3"75 mm. Seen from above oblong-
ovate, widest behind the middle ; greatest width equal to two fifths the length.
Sides sinuous, posterior extremity rounded, anterior end bluntly angular. Anterior
antennae with four apical setai and a curved hair- like filament; one of tlie ajiical
setce is very long and is provided with a fringe of small teeth on a portion of the
proximal half, similar to Ilalocypris imhricuta ; a small plumose seta springs from near
the middle of the penultimate joint. The blunt-pointed arrow-like head of the tentacle
reaches slightly beyond the extremity of the antennae. Secondary branch of the posterior
antennae furnished with a stout plumose seta on the enlarged basal joint ; the small
terminal joint benrs an extremely long ringed seta, another about one third as long, and
five very small setae, as well as a strongly-hooked claw. The first foot consists of four
moderately long subequal joints, wiiich are sparingly setiferous, and a very small terminal
joint furnished with three long plumose setae.
Habitat. The following are some localities where this species was obtained : —
January 5th, lat. 5° 58' 0" N., long. If 20' 0" W., collected near surface.
4^ 7' 3" E., 20 and 30 fathoms.
5° 7' 8" E., 20 fathoms (Station 14).
5° 55' 5" E., 35 and 460 fathoms.
6° 36' 6" E., 10 fathoms.
This species appears to be intermediate between II. atlantka, Lubbock, and H. imbri-
cata, Brady.
Halocypris aculeata, n. sp. (PI. XV. figs. 5, 6, 33, 34, 38.)
Shell seen from the side highest at the middle, height nearly equal to half the length ;
dorsal margin straight, right valve terminating posteriorly in a short backward- directed
spine-like process, similar to that at the anterior extremity of the left valve ; ventral
margin convex, evenly rounded, and forming a continuous curve from the postei'O-dorsal
spine round to the shallow notch under the beak in front. Seen from above elongate-
ovate, widest at the middle, evenly rounded, and tapering to the posterior extremity;
tapering and somewhat sinuate anteriorly. Valves smooth. Length 1 mm.
FllOiX THE GULF OF GUINEA. Ii3
Antcnnules in the female provided with numerous apical setce of moderate length (fig. 51-).
The last joint of the male antennule is ahruptly curved and furnished witli a dense sub-
apical fascicle of short hairs, besides several terminal setre, one of which is of considerable
length and much longrr than the others ; tentacle very slender and scarcely reaching to
the extremity of the antennule.
Secondary bninch of the male antennae nearly two thirds the length of the natatory
branch and furnished with two apical setae — one extremely long and one about two fifths
the length of the other. The antcnnal hook, which is sliglitly dentate on the inner
margin at the distal end, carries one short seta and two elongate ones on the exterior
edge, immediately behind the geniculation (fig. 55).
KaUtut. Lat. 0 19' 2" S., long. T 19' 0" E. This is the nearest observed position to
where the material containing specimens of this sjiecies was collected. It was a surface
gathering, collected at 8.45 p.bi. ; the position recorded was taken about 40 minutes
earlier on February 2nd.
The drawings of the side and dorsal views are from two specimens which differed some-
what in size. The length of the spines at the extremities of the dorsal margin varies in
different specimens.
Haloctpris punica, n. sp. (PL XV. figs. 7, 8, 39, 40.)
Shell (male) robust, subcentrally gibbous. Outline as seen from the side : — Dorsal
margin sinuated ; ventral margin slightly convex, immediately posterior to the subcentral
gibbosity, then bending up posteriorly in a flattened curve to a little below the horizontal
middle line of the shell ; thence the posterior extremity recedes upward in a gentle
slope to the dorsal margin, with which it forms a bluntly-rounded obtuse angle ; the
anterior margin is boldly convex below the notch, then evenly and gently rounded
inferiorly, where it merges into the ventral margin. Greatest height fully eqiial to half
the length. Beak prominent, stout. Seen from above, broadly and rather irregularly
ovate; greatest breadth, in front of the middle, equal to about half the length ; posterior
extremity bluntly rounded ; anterior end subacute. Antennules furnished with nine
apical seta?, the two inner ones abrujitly twice geniculated at the base ; two of the outer
rather longer than the others, and bearing a double row of small spiniform teeth near
the middle ; tentacle .slender and extending considerably beyond the apex of the anten-
nules. Secondary branch of the antennae short and stout, basal part dilated. The upper
margin with two processes — one narrow and tooth-like, the other larger and bearing two
small spines ; apical joint furnished with two terminal elongate setae, three small sub-
marginal filaments, and a small hook ; the hook has the inner margin at the distal end
slightly crenate or toothed. Several of the plumose seta^ of the natatory brancli are
thickened or spatulate at the extremity. Length "77 mm.
Habitat. Station 9 (lat. 3' 0' 8" N., long. 7' 43' 0" W.), 50 fathoms, in a tow-net
gathering, collected January 10th. A few specimens only were obtained.
144 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
III. FLATYCOPA.
Pamily CITHEEELLID^, G. O. Sars.
Genus Cttherella, JoBes (1S49).
CrXHEBELLA AFRICANA, n. sp. (PL XV. figs. 9, 10, 36, 41, 42.)
As seen from the side, the valves of the shell are broadly elliptical ; dorsal margin
flatly and somewhat unevenly rounded ; ventral margin slightly concave, extremities
boldly convex. Shell rather highest behind the middle ; height fully half the length.
Seen from above, the greatest breadth is near the posterior end, which is subtruncate ;
the sides are slightly curved and converge gently towards the anterior extremity, which
is somewhat emarginate. Surface of valves smooth. Length -86 mm. (l-29th of an inch),
Anterior antenna? 7-jointed, setiferous, the last joint with three spines fully twice the
length of the joint ; the secondary branch of the posterior antennae scarcely equal in
length to the first joint of the larger branch; post-abdominal laminse armed on the
exterior margin and apex ^\•it]^ several strong divaricate spines ; inner margin with three
or four smaller spines, having one of the edges setose (fig. 42).
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering, collected Eebruary 13th.
1886. The form of the shell of this species closely resembles Cytherella scotica, Brady.
It differs in being scarcely so truncate behind ; seen from above, the sides of the shell
are more distinctly curved in outline, and the dorsal margin, seen from the side, is slightly
convex instead of concave.
(?) Cytherella pumila. (PI. XV. figs. 11, 12.)
Shell outline, seen from the side, broadly elliptical ; dorsal margin flatly convex and
obscurely angulated ; greatest height equal to five ninths of the length ; ventral margin
gently and evenly rounded; extremities also moderately convex, but the anterior end is
rather narrower than the other and somewhat oblique. Seen from above, ovate ; greatest
breadth behind the middle and equal to four ninths of the length ; sides evenly rounded ;
extremities subacute. Length "57 mm.
Habitat. Loanda Harbour, in a surface tow-net gathering collected Februaiy 13th.
A single perfect specimen only was obtained and two valves.
DESCRIPTION OE THE PLATES.
Plate I.
Paracalanus pygmcevs (Clans?).
Fig. 1. Female, lateral view. X 53.
2. Anterior antenna. x 84.
3. Posterior antenna, x 165.
4. Posterior foot-jaw. x 170.
Fig. 5. Foot of seeond pair, x 125.
6. Foot of fourth pair, x 125.
7. Foot of fifth pair. x 250.
8. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 125.
FROM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
145
Paracalanus parvus (Claus)
ig. 9. Female, dorsal view, x 40.
10. Foot of first pair, x 95.
11. Foot of fourth pair. x 95.
Fig. 12. Foot of fifth pair, female, x 190.
13. Foot of fifth pair, male, x 125.
14. Abdomen and caudal stylets. x 63.
Fig. 15. Female, dorsal view, x 10.
IG. Posterior antenna. x 18.
17. Mandible, x 13.
18. Maxilla, x 13.
19. Anterior foot-jaw. x 23.
Eucalanus spinifer, n. sp.
Fig. 20. Posterior foot-jaw. x 13.
21. Foot of first pair. X 35.
22. Foot of third pair. X 35.
23. Foot of fifth pair, x 86.
Augaptilis longicaudatus (Claus).
Fig. 24. Female, dorsal view, x 12.
25. Posterior antenna. X 28.
Fig. 26. Anterior foot-jaw {a, one of the seta
more highly magnified). X 35.
Mecynocera Clausi, I. C. Thompson.
Fig. 27. Male, dorsal view. X 32.
28. Female, lateral view. X 32.
29. Anterior antenna. X 35.
30. Posterior antenna. X 125.
Fig. 31. Posterior foot-jaw. X 84.
32. Foot of first pair, x 100.
33. Foot of fourth paii-. X 100.
34. Foot of fifth pair. X 125.
Calocalanus plumulosim (Claus) .
Fig. 35. Foot of fifth pair. X 125. | Fig. 36. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 63.
Augaptilis hecticus, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 37. Anterior antenna, male. X 23.
38. Posterior antenna. X 18.
Fig. 39. Foot of fifth pair, female, x 86.
Plate II.
Augaptilis hecticus, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 1. Posterior foot-jaw. X 70.
2. Foot of second pair of swimming-feet.
X 43.
Fig. 3. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth
pair. X 345.
4. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, x |70.
Augajjtilis longicaudatus (Claris).
Fig. 5. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 23.
Hemicalanus plumosua, Claus.
Fig. 6. Posterior foot-jaw. x 32.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI.
19
146
ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Fig. 7. Mandible. X 125.
8. Anterior foot-jaw, X 165
Mecynocera Clausi, I. C. Thompson.
Fig. 9. Abdomen and candal stylets, female. 63 X.
10. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male. X 63.
Rhincalanus aculeatus, n. sp.
Fig. 11. Female, dorsal view. X 12'5.
13. Female, lateral view, x 12"5.
13. Anterior antenna. X 12'5.
14. Posterior antenna. X 20.
15. Mandible. X 76.
16. Maxilla, x 17.
17. Anterior £oot-jaw. x 40.
Fig. 18. Posterior foot-jaw. X 32.
19. Foot of first pair. X 38.
20. Foot of second pair, x 30.
21. Foot of fourth pair, x 30.
22. Foot of fifth pair. X 38.
23. (?) Immature female, x 10.
24. Foot of fifth pair of same. X
17.
Fig. 25. Female, dorsal view. X 9.
26. Anterior antenna.
27. Posterior antenna.
28. Mandible. X 18.
29. Maxilla. X 18.
30. Anterior foot-jaw.
31. Posterior foot-jaw.
32. Foot of first pair.
Aziffaptilis Rattrayi, n. sp.
Fig. 33. Foot of third pair, x 20.
34. Foot of fifth pair, x 28.
35. Rostrum, x 32.
36. Portion of seta of the posterior foot-jaw
{aa, " buttons " more highly magni-
fied). X 380,
37. Portion of test highly magnified.
Fig. 38. Male, dorsal view. X 20.
39. Anterior antenna, female.
40. Mandible. X 115.
Augaptilis hecticus, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 41. Anterior foot-jaw. X 70.
X 13. 42. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 20.
Heterocalanus serricaudata, n. sp.
Fig. 43. Female, dorsal view. X 32.
44. Female, lateral \Aew [a, ovisac more
highly magnified). X 32.
45. Posterior foot-jaw. X 190.
Fig. 46. Foot of fifth pair, female. X 135.
47. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 7G.
48. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male. X 76.
Plate III.
Heterocalanus serricaudatus, n. sp.
Fig. 1. Antenior antenna, female, x 100.
2. Right anterior antenna, male, x 76.
3. Posterior antenna, x 70.
4. Mandible («, mandible palp), x 190.
Fig. 5. Anterior foot-jaw. x 250.
6. One of the swimming-feet, x 128.
7. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, x 150.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
147
Plettromma princeps, u. sp.
Fig. 8. Male, dorsal view, x 4.
9. Male, lateral view, x 4.
10. Right anterior antenna {a, nineteenth
joint more highly magnified), x 8.
11. Left anterior antenna, x 4.
12. Posterior antenna, x 9.
13. Mandible and palp, x 10'5.
Fig. 14. Maxilla. X 10.
15. Anterior foot-jaw. x 13'5.
16. Posterior foot-jaw. X 12.
17. Foot of first pair. X 13'5.
18. Foot of second paii'. X 13"5.
19. Foot of fourth pair, x 13*5.
20. Foot of fifth pair, x 16.
Scolecithrix latipes, n. sp, $ .
Fig. 21. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth
swimmiug-foot. x 95.
Fig. 22. Foot of fifth pair, x 7Q>.
23. Abdomen and caudal stvlets.
X 20.
Scolecithrix major, n. sp. ? .
Fig. 24. Anterior foot-jaw. x 76.
25. Terminal spine of outer branch of third swimming-foot.
26. Foot of fifth pair, x 127.
X 12/
Fig. 27. Male, lateral view, x 27.
28. Left anterior antenna. X 35.
29. Anterior foot-jaw. x 18.
Scolecithrix dubia, Giesbrecht. ^.
Fig. 30. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth
swimming foot. X 127.
31. Fifth pail- of thoracic feet. X 84.
32. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 80.
Fig. 33. Female, lateral view, x 18.
34. Anterior antenna. X 22.
35, Anterior foot-jaw. x 95.
Scolecithrix tumicla, n. sp.
Fig. 36. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth
swimmiug-foot. X 127.
37. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 127.
38, Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 27.
Fig. 39. Male, lateral view, x 20.
40, Anterior antenna. X 27.
41, Posterior antenna. X 23.
42, Mandible. X 47.
Amallophora typica, n. sp.
Fig. 43. Maxilla, x 47.
44. Anterior foot-jaw. x 115,
45. Posterior foot-jaw, X 35.
46. Foot of second pair-, x 35.
Plate IV.
Fig. 1, Foot of third pair, x 35.
2. Foot of fourth pair, x 35.
Amallophora typica, n. sp.
Fig. 3. Foot of fifth pair, x 57.
4. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x
19*
18.
148
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Pig. 5. Female, lateral view. X 10.
6. Anterior foot-jaw. X 127.
7. Posterior foot-jaw. x 20.
Amallophora magna, n. sp.
Fig. 8. Terminal spine of outer brancli of fourth
swimming-foot, highly magnified,
9. Foot of fifth pail'. X 125.
Pig. 10. Male, lateral view, x 13.
11. Right anterior antenna. X 20.
12. Left anterior antenna. X 20.
13. Anterior foot-jaw. X 95.
14. Posterior foot-jaw. X G3.
Amallophora dubia, n. sp.
Fig. 15. Foot of first pair, x 63.
16. Foot of fourth pair, x 48.
17. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, x 40.
18. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 27.
Amallophora dubia, var. similis.
Fig. 19. Male, lateral view. X 18.
20. Anterior antenna. X 27.
21. Terminal sf)ine of outer branch of fourth swimming-foot.
22. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 63.
23. Abdomen and caudal stylets. x 27.
X 127.
Fig. 24. Female, lateral view. X 13,
. 25. Anterior foot-jaw. X 53.
26. Posterior foot-jaw. X 53.
Amallophora robusia, n. sp.
Fig. 27. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth
swimming-foot. X 127.
28. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 95.
29. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 27.
Pig. 30. Male, lateral view, x 22.
31. Anterior antenna, female. X 37.
32. Anterior antenna, male. X 37.
33. Anterior foot-jaw. x 20.
34. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female
X 127.
Candace intermedia, n. sp.
Fig. 35. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, x 67.
36. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 27.
37. Abdomen and
X 27.
caudal stylets, male.
Candace varicans, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 38. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female. X 20.
39. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male. X 20.
Fig. 40. Male, lateral view, x 9.
41. Anterior antenna, female. X 13.
42. Anterior antenna, male. X 13.
43. Posterior antenna. X 27.
44. Mandible, x 27.
45. Maxilla, x 27.
46. Anterior foot-jaw. X 63.
47. Posterior foot-jaw, female.
48. Posterior foot- jaw, male.
49. Foot of first pair. X 35.
Scolecithrix securifrons, n. sp.
Fig. 50. Foot of second pair, x 27.
51. Foot of fourth pair. X 20.
52. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female. X 40.
53. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, X 20.
54. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female,
dorsal view. X 16.
55. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male,
dorsal view. X 13.
56. Abdomen, female, lateral view, x 12,
X 40,
X 40,
FEOM TIIE GULF OF GUINEA.
149
Plate V.
Scolecitkrix securifrons, n. sp.
Fig. 1. Rostrum, x 27.
Scolecitkrix ctenopus, Giesbrecht. S •
Fig. 2. Male, lateral view, x 22.
3. Riglit anterior antenna, x 23.
4. Left anterior antenna, x 23.
5. Anterior foot-jaw. X 150.
Pig. 6. Posterior foot-jaw. x 127.
7. Foot of third pair. x 46.
8. Foot of fifth pair, x 42.
9. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 34.
Scolecitkrix tenuipes, n. sp. (J .
Fig. 10. Male, lateral \dew.
11. Right anterior antenna
X 20.
X 28.
12. Left anterior antenna, x 28.
13. Anterior foot-jaw. x 115.
14. Posterior foot-jaw. x 115.
Fig. 15. Foot of second pair, x 73.
16. Foot of tldrd pair. x 73.
17. Foot of fourth pair, x 57.
18. Fifth pair. X 57.
19. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 35.
Scolecitkrix longicornis, u. sp. ? .
Fig. 20. Female, lateral view, x 27.
21. Anterior antenna. X 36.
22. Anterior foot-jaw. X 127.
23. Posterior foot-jaw. X 85.
24. Foot of first pair. X 64.
Fig. 25. Foot of second pair, x 76.
26. Foot of third pair, x 64.
27. Foot of fifth pair. X 250.
28. Abdomen and caudal stylets.
Scolecitkrix Bradyi, Giesbrecht.
X 53.
Fig. 29. Male, lateral %-iew. x 18.
30. Anterior antenna, female. X 48.
31. Anterior antenna, male. X 53.
32. Posterior antenna, x 95.
33. Mandible. X 63.
34. Anterior foot-jaw. X 170.
35. Posterior foot-jaw. X 95.
Fig. 36. Terminal spine of outer branch of one of.
the swimming-feet, x 170.
37. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male. X 53
38. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 40.
39. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male. X 32.
Scolecitkrix latipes, n. sp. ? .
Fig. 40. Female, lateral dew. x 12.
41. Anterior antenna. X 18
Fig. 42. Anterior foot-jaw. x 25.
43. Rostrum, x 27.
Fig. 44. Female, lateral view.
Scolecitkrix major, n. sp.
X 18. I Fig. 45. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 20.
Fig. 46. Male, lateral view, x 13.
47. Anterior antenna. X 13.
48. Posterior antenna. X 23.
Calanus comptus, Dana. ^ .
Fig. 49. Mandible, x 35.
50. Maxilla, x 35.
150 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Plate VI
Calanus comptus, Dana. ^ .
Fig. 1. Posterior foot-jaw. X 56.
2. Foot of first pair. X 35.
3. Termiaal spine of outer brancli of first swimming-foot, greatly magnified.
4. Foot of fourth pair. X 23.
5. Foot of fifth pair. X 23.
Hemicalanus plumosus, Clans.
Fig. 6. Anterior foot-jaw. X 27.
Calocalanus plumulosus (Claus) .
Fig. 7. Female, lateral view. X 35. | Fig. 8. Anterior antenna. X 53.
Calocanus pavo (Dana).
Fig. 9. Female, dorsal view. X 53. | Fig. 10. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 115.
Pleuromma gracile, Claus.
Fig. 11. Male, dorsal view. X 17'5.
12. Right anterior antenna of the same. X 23.
13. Left anterior antenna of the same. X 35.
14. 14th joint of left anterior antenna. X 415.
Euchirella messinensis (Claus).
Fig. 15. Male, dorsal view, x 7-6. | Fig. 16. Posterior antenna. X 20.
Euchata barbata, Brady.
Fig. 17. Male, dorsal view. X 6*5.
Euchceta hebes, Giesbrecht.
Fig, 18. Male, lateral view. X 13. | Fig. 19. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 26.
Euchceta hebes, var. valida.
Fig. 20. Male, lateral view. X 5-8.
21. Terminal spine of outer branch of fourth swimming-feet. X 63.
22. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 13.
Euchceta australis, Brady.
Fig. 23. Female, dorsal view. X 9.
Euchceta (?) Hessei, var. similis.
Fig. 24. Male, lateral view. X 18. | Fig. 25. Fifth paii- of thoracic feet, x 53.
Phyllopus bidentatus, Brady.
Fig. 26. Male, dorsal view, x 10.
27. Mouth as seen from the side (a, outline, seen from above), highly magnified.
28. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 43.
J
PEOM THE GFLF OP GIJINEA.
Pontellopsis villosa, Brady.
151
Kg. 29.
30.
31.
Male, dorsal view, x 13.
Anterior antennaj male, x 20.
Posterior antenna, x 26.
Fig. 32. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female. x63.
33. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, x 53.
34. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 35.
Phaenna spinifera, Claus.
Fig. 35. Male, lateral \'iew. x 13.
Labidocera detruncata, var. intermedia.
Pig. 36.
37.
Fig. 39.
40.
Fig. 43.
44.
45,
Posterior foot-jaw. x 41.
Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female, x 76.
Fig. 38. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male, X 34.
Labidocera Darwinii (Lubbock).
Posterior foot-jaw. X 50.
Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female. X 63.
Fig. 41. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male. X 50.
42. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 38.
Pontella mediterranea, Claus.
Female, dorsal view. X 13.
Anterior antenna, female (and rostrum).
X 27.
Hinged joints of right anterior antenna,
male. X 63.
Fig. 46. Posterior foot-jaw. X 48.
47. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female
(? immature), x 100.
48. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, mael. X 63.
Plate VII.
Phaenna spinifera, Claus.
Fig. 1. Anterior foot-jaw. x 95. | Fig- 2. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 50.
Labidocera detruncata, var. intermedia.
Fig. 3. Female, lateral view, x 13. | Fig. 4. Anterior antenna, male. X 20.
Labidocera Darwinii (Liibbock).
Fig. 5. Male, dorsal view, x 18.
Fig. 6, Hinged joints of right anterior antenna,
male. X 50.
Candace varicans, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 7. Anterior antenna, female, x 24.
8. Eight anterior antenna, male, x 24.
Fig. 9. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female. X 95.
10. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male. X 95.
Mormonilla phasma, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 11. Female, lateral view, x 27.
12. Anterior antenna, x 32.
13. Posterior antenna, x 63.
14. Mandible. X 50.
15. Maxilla. X 50.
16. Anterior foot-jaw. x 76.
Fig. 17. Posterior foot-jaw. X 95.
18. Foot of first pair, x 95.
19. Foot of second paii'. x 95.
20. Foot of fourth pair. X 76.
21. Abdomen and caudal stylets.
X 53.
152
ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Acartia plumosa, n. sp.
-Fig. 23. Female, dorsal view, x 32.
23. Anterior antenna, female. X 63.
. 34. Right anterior antenna, male. X 63.
25. Hinged joints of male right anterior
antenna, x 253.
26. Foot of first pair. X 95.
27. Foot of fourth pair, x 7Q.
28. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female (front
view). X 153.
Fig. 29. Foot of fifth pair, female (side view).
X 153.
30. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male.
X 153.
31. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 50.
32. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male.
X 50.
Acartia Clausi, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 33. Male, dorsal view. X 32.
34. Anterior antenna, female. X 63.
35. Right anterior antenna, male («, hinged
joints more magnified) . X 63.
36. Foot of fourth pair, x 95.
37. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female.
X 125.
Fig. 38. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male.
Xl53.
39. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female,
X 50.
40. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male.
X 50. .
Paracartia dubia, n. sp.
Fig. 41. Left anterior antenna of male. X 63.
Fig. 42. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male.
X 127.
Plate VIII.
Paracartia spinicaudata, n. sp. ? .
X 40.
X 63.
X 127.
X 127.
Fig. 1. Female, dorsal view
2. Anterior antenna.
3. Posterior antenna.
4. Mandible and palp.
5. Maxilla, x 127.
6. Anterior foot-jaw. X 127
Fig. 12. Male, dorsal view. X 27.
13. Right anterior antenna, x 63
Fig. 7. Posterior foot-jaw. x 127.
8. Foot of first pail-, x 127.
9. Foot of fourth pair, x 95.
10. Fifth pair of thoracic feet.
11. Abdomen and caudal stylets.
X 127.
X 95.
Paracartia dubia, n. sp. (J .
Fig. 14. Foot of fourth pair. X 95.
15. Abdomen and caudal stylets.
X 63.
radius armiger, Giesbrecht.
Fig. 16. Female, dorsal view, x 20.
17. Male, lateral view. X 21.
18. Anterior antenna. X 21.
19. Posterior antenna, x 23.
20. Mandible and palp. X 38.
21. Anterior foot-jaw. X 47.
Fig. 22. Posterior foot-jaw. x 39.
23. Foot of first pair, x 57.
24. Foot of second pair. X 57.
25. Foot of fourth pair, x 42.
26. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, x 85.
27. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 39.
J
PROxM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
153
Clausocalanus latipes, n. sp. ^ .
Fig. 28. Riglit anterior antenna. X 59.
29. Mandible and palj). X 115.
30. Anterior t'oot-jaw. X 115.
31. Posterior foot-jaw. X 115.
32. Foot of first pair. X 86.
Fig. 33. Foot of seeond pair. X 86.
34. Foot of tliird pair. X 86.
35. Foot of fonrth pair. X 86.
36. Fifth pair of tlioracic feet. X 2-30.
37. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 57.
Clausocalanus urcuicoriiis, Dana, cj .
Fig. 38. Male, lateral view, x 23.
39. Anterior antenna. X 35.
40. Posterior antenna. X 23.
41. Mandible palp. X 85.
42. Maxilla. X 113.
Fig. 43. Anterior foot-jaw
X 276.
44. Posterior foot-jaw. X 172.
45. Foot of first pair. X 115.
46. Fifth pair of tlioracic feet.
X 115.
47. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 57.
Temoropia inaijtiinbaetisis, n. sp.
Fig. 48. Right anterior antenna of male. X 88. i Fig. 49. Mandible and palp. X 63.
Plate IX.
Temoropia mayumbaensis, n. sp
Fi
7. Inner branch of seeond thoracic feet.
X 95.
8. Fifth pair of tlioracic feet, female. X 95.
9. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male. X 95.
10. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female,
dorsal view. X 63.
11. Abdomen of female, lateral view. x63.
12. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male. x63.
Temora Jongicornis (M tiller).
Fig. 13. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, male. X 95.
Oithona minuta, n. sj).
Fig. 14. Female, dorsal view, x 72.
15. Anterior antenna, female, x 169.
16. Anterior antenna, male, x 230.
17. Posterior antenna, x 230.
18. Mandible, x 270.
19. Mandible palp, x 2.30.
20. Anterior foot-jaw. X 230.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI.
Fig. 21. Posterior foot-jaw. X 345.
22. Foot of first pair. X 230.
23. Foot of fourth pair. X 2.30.
24. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female
(a, fifth pair of feet). X 127.
25. Abdomen and caudal stylets, male.
X 200.
20
154
ME. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Fig. 26. Female, lateral view. X 42.
27. Anterior autenua, female. X 230
28. Posterior anteuua. X 127.
29. Mandible and palp. X 35.
30. Anterior foot-jaw. X 253.
31. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
Fig. 36. Female, lateral view, x 53.
37. Anterior antenna. X 460.
38. Posterior antenna. X 170.
39. Anterior foot -jaw. X 460.
40. Posterior foot-jaw. X 345.
Ectinosoma Chry stall, n. sp.
Fig. 32. Foot of first pair of swimming-feet.
X 138.
33. Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
X 127.
34. Foot of fifth pair. X 190.
35. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 95.
Bradya brevicornis, n. sp.
Fig. 41. Foot of first pair. X 190.
42. Foot of fifth pair. X 190.
43. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 95.
Fig. 44. Female, lateral view. X 63.
45. Anterior antenna. X 190.
Amymone Andreun, n. sp.
Fig. 46. Posterior antenna. X 190.
47. Anterior foot-jaw. X 380.
Plate X.
Amymone Andrewi, n. sp.
Fig. 1. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
Fig. 2. Female, lateral view. X 53.
3. Anterior antenna. X 253.
4. Posterior antenna. X 190.
5. Mandible and palp. X 380.
6. Maxilla. X 190.
7. Anterior foot-jaw. X 253.
Fig. 13. Female, lateral view. X 53.
14. Anterior autenua. X 253.
15. Posterior antenna. X 380.
16. Mandible aud palp. X 380.
17. Maxilla. X 500.
18 Anterior foot-jaw. X 253.
Stenhelia accraensis, n. sp.
Fig. 8. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
9. Foot of first pair. X 152.
10. Foot of fourth pair. X 152.
11. Foot of fifth pair. X 126.
12. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 63.
Laophonte hnr/ipes, n. sp.
Fig. 19. Posterior foot-jaw. X 190.
20. Foot of first pair. X 190.
21. Foot of fourth pair, x 190.
22. Foot of fifth pair. X 190.
23. Last abdominal segments aud caudal
stylets. X 95.
Laophonte pygmasa, n. sp.
Fig. 24. Female, lateral view, x 53.
25. Anterior antenna. X 253.
26. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
27 Foot of first pair. X 253.
Fig. 28. Foot of fourth pair. X 253.
29. Foot of fifth pair. X 253.
30. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 127.
PEOM THE GULF OF GUINEA.
155
Laophonte brevicornis, ii. sp.
Fig. 31. Female, lateral view. x 53.
32. Anterior antenna, x 253.
33. Posterior foot-jaw. x 253.
34. Foot of first pair, x 253.
Fig. 38. Female lateral view, x 33.
39. Anterior antenna, x 190.
40. Posterior foot- jaw. x 253.
41. Foot of first pair. x 190.
Fig. 35. Foot of fourth pair, x 253.
36. Foot of fifth pair, x 253.
37. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 126.
Dactijlopus lut'qws, n. sp.
Fig. 42. Foot of fifth pair. x 127
last ab(
stylets. X G3.
43. Last abdominal segments and caudal
Dactylopus propinquus, n. sp.
Fig. 44. Female, lateral view. x 53.
45. Anterior antenna, female. x 190.
46. Anterior autenuaj male. x 253.
47. Posterior antenna, x 253.
48. Posterior foot-jaw. x 253.
Fig. 49. Foot of first pair, x 190.
50. Foot of fifth pair, female, x 190.
51 . Foot of fifth pair, male, x 190.
52. One of the appendages of first abdominal
segment, male, x 190.
Plate XI.
Badylopus propinquus, u. sp.
Fig. 1. Foot of second pair of swimming-feet, male, x 190.
2. Foot of third pair of swimming-feet, male, x 190.
3. Last abdominal segments and caudal stylets, x 95.
Ilyopsyllus affinis, n. sp.
Fig. 4. Female, dorsal view, x 60.
5. Female, lateral view, x 60.
6. Anterior antenna, female. X 250.
7. Anterior antenna, male. X 250.
8. Posterior antenna. X 330.
9. Mandible and palp, x 380.
10. Maxilla and (?) oral aperture. X 500.
Fig. 11. Anterior foot-jaw. x 500.
12. Posterior foot-jaw. x 330.
13. Foot of first pah-. x 190.
14. Foot of third pair. X 152.
15. Foot of fifth pair, female, x 500.
16. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 95.
17. Rostrum, x 300.
Mir acta minor, n. sp.
Fig. 18. Female, lateral view, x 53.
19. Anterior antenna, female. X 152.
20. Anterior antenna, male. X 190.
21. Posterior antenna. X 190.
22. Posterior foot-jaw, female. X 253.
23. Posterior foot jaw, male. X 253.
24. Foot of first pair. X 108.
Fig. 25. Foot of second pair, female, x 108.
2Q. Foot of second pair, male, x 108.
27. Foot of third pair, x 108.
28. Fifth pair of thoracic feet, female.
X 95.
29. Foot of fifth pair, male, x 190.
30. Abdomen and caudal stylets, x 76.
20*
156
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTKACA
^gisthus longirostris, n. sp.
Fig. 31. Female, dorsal view. X 20.
32. Female, side view. X 18.
33. Anterior antenna, female. X 53.
34. Anterior antenna, male. X 32.
35. Posterior antenna, x G3.
36. Mandible. X 190.
37. Maxilla. X 140.
Fig. 38. Anterior foot-jaw. X 190.
39. Posterior foot-jaw, female. X 95.
40. Posterior fout-jaw, male. X 95.
41. Foot of first pair, x 40.
42. Foot of fourth pair. X 40.
43. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 53.
44. Extremity of one of the stylets. X
190.
Fig. 45. Adult dorsal view. X 10"7.
46. Anterior antenna. X 63.
47. Posterior antenna. X 40.
Copilia Fultoni, n. sp.
Fig. 48. Mandible.
9-
01 .
49. Ma.xilla. X 190.
50. Anterior foot-jaw. X 253.
Plate XII.
Cojiilia Fultoni, n. sp.
Fig. 1. Posterior foot-jaw. X 20.
2. Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet, x 63.
3. Abdomen and caudal stylets {a, fifth foot). X 26.
Saplmina metalUna, Dana.
Fig. 4. One of the caudal stylets with leaf-like appendages (cercophijlla). X 125.
(?) Artotrogus abyssicolus, n. sp. (?) d ,
Fig. 5. Adult, dorsal view. X 27.
6. Anterior autenna. X 63.
7. Posterior antenna. X 253.
Fig. 8. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
9. Abdomen and caudal stylets. X 84.
Longipedia minor, T. & A. Scott.
Fig. 10. Male, lateral view, x 53.
11. Foot of second pair. X 84.
12. Fifth pair of thoracic feet and appendages of first abdominal segment.
13. Last abdominal segments and caudal stylets. X 153.
Euterpe gracilis, Claus, var. annata, n. var.
X 190.
Fig. 14. Female, lateral view, x 53.
15. Anterior antenna. X 190.
16. Anterior antenna. X 190.
17. Mandible. X 190.
18. Maxilla. X 190.
Fig. 24. Female, lateral view, x 53.
25. Anterior antenna. X 190.
26. Foot of first pair, x 153.
Fig. 19. Anterior foot-jaw. x 190.
20. Posterior foot-jaw. X 253.
21. Foot of first pair. X 190.
22. Foot of fourth pair. X 190.
23. Fifth pair of thoracic feet. X 190.
Laophonie serratu, Claus.
Fig. 27. Foot of fifth pair, x 127.
28. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 95.
FEOM THE GULF OF GUI^VEA.
Cletodes linearis, Cliius.
157
Fig. 29. Female, lateral view, x 53.
30. Anterior auteuna, female. x 190.
31. Foot of fifth pair, female. x 153.
Fig. 32. Fifth pair of thoracic feet (a), and ap-
pendages [b) of first abdominal seg-
ment. X 153.
Thalestris forficula, Clans.
Fig. 33. Female, lateral view, x 53.
34. Anterior antenna, x 190.
35. Posterior antenna, x 190.
36. Anterior foot-jaw. x 253.
37. Posterior foot-jaw. x 253.
Fig. 38. Foot of first pair. x 153.
39. Foot of fonrth pair, x 153.
40. Foot of fifth pair, x 153.
41. Last abdominal segments and caudal
stylets. X 127.
Harpacticus chelifer, Midler, var.
Fig. 42. Male, lateral view, x 20.
43. Posterior foot-jaw. x 76.
44. Foot of first pair, x 50.
Fig. 45. Foot of second pair, x 50.
46. Foot of fifth pair. x 127.
Clytemnestra rosiraia (Brady).
Fig. 47. Female, lateral view. x 32.
48. Female, dorsal view, x 32.
49. Male, dorsal view, x 32.
50. Anterior antenna, female, x 95.
51. Anterior antenna, male. x 95.
52. Posterior antenna, x 127.
Fig. 53. Jlandible and palpi, x 253.
54. Maxilla. x 380.
55. Anterior foot-jaw. x 253.
56. Posterior foot-jaw, female, x 127.
57. Posterior foot-jaw, male. x 95.
Plate XIII.
Clytemnestra rostra fa (Brady).
Fig. 1. Foot of first pair of swimming-feet, x 95.
2. Foot of second pair of swimming-feet. x 95.
3. Foot of fifth pair of swimming-feet, x 127.
Fig. 4. Female, dorsal view. x 53.
5. Anterior antenna, x 53.
6. Posterior antenna, x 84.
7. Mandible, x 153.
8. Maxilla, x 153.
Onccea gracilis (Dana).
Fig. 9. Anterior foot-jaw. x 127
10. Posterior foot-jaw. x 95
11. Foot of fourth pair, x 95.
12. Abdomen and caudal stylets [a, fifth
feet). X 50.
OncdRa mediterranea (Claus).
Fig. 13. Female, dorsal view, x 53.
14. Anterior antenna, x (53.
15. Posterior antenna, x 100.
Fig. 16. Posterior foot-ja^v. x 95.
17. Foot of fourth pair, x 127.
158
MR. T. SCOTT ON ENTOMOSTEACA
Fig. 18. Adult, dorsal view, x 18.
19. Anterior antenna. x 48.
20. Posterior antenna. x 63.
21. (?) Mandible, x 190.
Fig. 25. Male, dorsal view, x 53.
26. Anterior antenna, x 100.
27. Mandible, x 190.
Pachysoma punctata, Claus.
Fig. 22. (?) Maxilla, x 153.
23. (?) Anterior foot-jaw. x 253.
24. Foot of fourth pair, x 50.
Cyclopicera lata, Brady.
Fig. 28. Maxilla, x 153.
29. Foot of fourth pair, x 100.
30. Foot of fifth pair, x 190.
Hersiliodes Liviriffstoni, n. sp.
Fig. 31. Female, dorsal view. x 27.
32. Anterior antenna, x 127.
33. Posterior antenna, x 95.
34. ??i.. Mandible ; w.r., Maxilla; Mouth.
X 127.
Fig. 35. Anterior foot-jaw. Posterior foot-jaw.
X 127.
36. Foot of first pair, x 76.
37. Foot of fourth pair. x 76.
38. Foot of fifth pair, x 48.
Fig. 39. Female, dorsal view, x 35.
40. Anterior antenna. x 127.
41. Posterior antenna, x 127.
42. Mandible. x 253.
43. Maxilla. x 253.
Lichomolyus congoensis, n. sp.
Fig. 44. Anterior foot-jaw. x 253.
45. Posterior foot-jaw. x 190.
46. Foot of fourth pair. x 135.
47. Foot of fifth pair, x 190.
48. Abdomen and caudal stylets.
X 84.
Fig. 49. Male, dorsal view.
50. Anterior antenna.
51. Posterior antenna.
52. Mandible, x 190.
53. Maxilla, x 253.
Pseudaiithessius propinquus, u. sp.
x 35.
x 170.
X 135.
Fig. 54. Posterior foot-jaw, female, x 84.
55. Foot of first pair. x 135.
56. Abdomen and caudal stylets, female.
X 40.
Saphirella abysslcola, n. sp.
Fig. 57. (?) Adult, dorsal view, x 25. | Fig. 58. Posterior antenna, x 125.
Plate XIV.
Pseudanthesshis jjropinrjuus, n. sp.
Fig. 1. Anterior foot- jaw. x 190.
2. Posterior foot-jaw, male, x 53.
3. Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
X 135.
4. Foot of fifth pair, x 127.
FEOM TILE GULF OF GUINEA.
159
Saphirella abyssicola, n. sp.
Fig. 5. Anterior antenna, x 125.
6. Mandible, x I'JO.
7. Maxilla. X 152.
Fig. 8. Anterior foot-jaw. X 190.
9. Posterior foot-jaw. X 170.
10. Foot of first pair of swimming- feet, x 95.
Arlrotrogus abi/ssicohis, n. sp.
Fig. 11. Female, dorsal view, x 35.
12. Anterior antenna, x 127.
13. Posterior antenna. x 135.
14. Mandible, x 253.
15. Anterior foot-jaw. x 152.
Fig. 16. Posterior foot-jaw. X 152.
17. Foot of first pair of swimming-feet.
X 100.
18. Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
X 95.
Caliyus Murrayanus, n. sp.
Fig. 19. Adult, ventral view, x 17.
Caliyus bengoensis, n. sp.
Fig. 20. Adult, ventral \ievi. x 19.
(?) Caligus Thymni, Dana.
Fig. 21. Adult, ventral view, x 8.
Caligus dubiiis, n. sp.
Fig. 22. Adult, ventral view, x 12-5.
Nogagus validus, Dana.
Fig. 23. Adult, ventral view, x 7-5.
Pontojisyllus elongatus, n. g. et sp.
Fig. 24. Adult, dorsal view. X 20.
25. Anterior antenna. X 135.
26. Posterior antenna. X 84.
27. jNIandible (w.) and maxilla (»2cr.). X 190.
28. One of tlie foot-jaws, x 125.
Fig. 29. Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
X 95.
30. (?) Immature form ; (*.) sucking-disk.
X 60.
Cypria atlantica, n. sp.
Fig. 31. Shell seen from the side, x 40.
32. Shell seen from above. X 40.
Fig. 33. Shell seen from the side (young), x 46.
Phlyctenophora afncana, n. sp.
Fig. 34. Shell seen from the side. X 27. | Fig. 35. Shell seen from above. X 27.
Pontocypris trigonella, G. O. Sars.
Fig. 36. Shell seen from the side. X 27. I Fig. 37. Shell seen from above. X 27.
Pontocypris subreniformis, n. sp.
Fig. 38. Shell seen from the side. X 44.
Fig. 39. Shell seen from above. x44.
160 ME. T. SCOTT ON ENIOMOSTEACA
Bairdia inornata, n. sp.
Fig. 40. Shell seen from the side. X 37. | Fig. 41. Shell seen from above. X 37.
Ctjthere multicatxi, n. sp.
Fig. 42. Shell seen from the side. X 32. | Fig. 43. Shell seen from above. x32.
Cijthere sculptU'is, u. sp.
Fig. 44. Shell seen from the side. X48. | Fig. 45. Shell seen from above. x48.
Gythere rimosa, n. sp.
Fig. 46. Shell seen from the side. x40. | Fig. 47. Shell seen from above. X40.
Cythere thalassica, n. sp.
Fig. 48. Shell seen from the side. X 30. | Fig. 49. Shell seen from above. X 30.
Cythere venusta, u. sp.
Fig. 50. Shell seen from the side. x28'5. | Fig. 51. Shell seen from above. x28'5.
Cytherura simulans, n. sp.
Fig. 52. Shell seen from the side. X 54, | Fig. 53. Shell seen from above. X 54.
Cytheropteron trilobites, Brady.
Fig. 54. Shell seen from the side. x40'5. | Fig. 55. Shell seen from above. x40"5.
Asterojje squamiger, n. sp.
Fig. 56. Shell seen from the side. X 22. | Fig. 57. Shell seen from above. X 22.
Sarsiella Murrayana, n. sj).
Fig. 58. Shell seen fi'om the side. X 27.
Plate XV.
Fig. 1. Halocypris elungata, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 8'5.
2. „ ,, n. sp. Shell seen from above. X 8"5.
3. „ torosa, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 7.
4. „ ,, n. sp. Shell seen fi'om above. X 7.
5. „ aculeata, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 30.
6. ,, „ u. sp. Shell seen from above. X 30.
7. „ jnmica, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 32.
8. „ ,, u. sp. Shell seen from above. X 32.
9. Cytherella africana, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 28"5.
10. ,, „ n. sp. Shell seen from above. X 28'5.
11. „ pumila, n. sp. Shell seen from the side. X 40.
12. „ „ n. sp. Shell seen from above. X 40.
13. Cythere multicava, n. sp. Antennule. X 95.
14. Asterope squamiger, u. sp. Antennule. X 54.
15. Cythere multicava, n. sp. Antenna. X 95.
FKOM THE GULF OF GUINEA. 161
Fig. 16. Ci/jjria utlanlica. Shell structure higlily magiiififd.
17. Phlijctcnopliora africana, n. sp. Oue ol' the auteunules. X 95.
18. „ ,, n. sp. One of the antennae, x 127.
19. ,, „ n. sp. The post-abdomen, x 95.
20. Cypria atlantica, ii. sp. One of the anteunie. X 127.
21. „ ,, n. sp. Oue of tlie antcnuules. x 95.
22. Asterope squamiger, n. sp. One of the antenna;. X 5i.
23. „ „ n. sp. The post-abdomcu. X 27.
24. SaraleUa Miirrayanu, w. s[i. One of the antcnuules. X 54.
25. Cypria ai/anticti, n. sp. The post-abdomcu. X 127.
20. Asterope squamiger, u. sp. One of the first maxilhe. X 54.
27. Halocypris cloiigutu, u. sp. One of the autcuua;.
28. Sarsiella Murrayana, u. sp. Ovigerous foot, x 190.
29. ,, „ n. sp. One of tlie auteuuic. X 80.
30. Halocypris eloiigata, u. sp. One of tlie antcnuules.
31. Sarsiella Murray ana, u.s^. The post-abdomen, x 127.
32. Halocypris torusa, n. sj). Oue of the antcnuules. x 13.
33. „ aculeatu, n. sp. Oue of the autcuuules (female), x 54.
34. „ „ n. sp. Oue of the autenuaj. X 27.
35. „ torosa, u. sp. First foot. x 13.
30. Cytlierella africana, n. !ip. One of the anterior antciui;e. X 95.
37. Halocypris torosa, u. sp. One of the antenuic. X 13.
38. „ «c'«/('a/«, n. sp. One of the antcnuules (male), x 40.
39. .., pmiica, n. sp. One of the autenuulcs. x 51.
40. „ „ n. sp. Oue of the autcuuffi. x 54.
41. Cytfierella a/ricana, n. up. Oue of the posterior autennie. X 95.
42. „ „ u. sp. The post-abdomen, x 95.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 21
T-RANs LiNN-Soc .5ee..2.Zool.VoiM.T1.1.
•-r(7vr ^jc^ , aei. . eo. r-ar
ilNTOMOSTRACA FROX GULF OF C-LTIl^niA.
\
Trai^s.Linn.Soc.Ser^?. Zool yohVlPi..2
1/
m
/ X'AW^
jfe..;r<^.- S..,-.,,l£.^^.
TraNS.L inn. SoC . Sf.R.2;.Z0OL YoL YI .PI , 3 .
\ I llii/m ;
J Cartev s.c
ENTOMOSTRACA FROM GULF OF GUINtA
■Wf^-.H^wmantCimp
Traus.Linn.Soc .Ser.E.Zool.Vol^^^'.PI. 4
■"- -ot-t ,iiel .ad iji..\..
ENTOMOSTKACA -pROM GULF OT GUINEA
Wt-t*. l-I^v/iiian a. O
Scoll
TRANS.LTNN.S0C.SER.2.Zo0L.V0Lyi.PL.5.
EMTOMOSTRACA ?R01./r GULF OF GUINZA.
- '., :irvnT>'T\ i. ,5 uno
3 coll
1 A AN:
\
^^~^?ijy^i^i^^,ifcliS3>-
;'«
/
ir-
\ J3
^Ult»ff ■-
iL^xe^v . car*. .deliSci- nait .
ENTOMOSTKACA FROM GulI-OP GUINEA.
bcolL.
TransIinn .Soc .Ser.2.Zool .VolM-PI .7.
-' Carter sc.
EWTOMOSTRAC^ TROM GULF OP GUINEiV
V/r-,*,,M<:wmar! S. C'lmp .
ScoU
T RANs.L INN . Soc . Ser.2 .ZooLYoLT'/r . P 1 . 9 .
C. Carter «.
£NTOMOSTRACA PROM GIILT OF G tJTNIA
■s' JIs-,vavan ', C 'mp
Scott.
Trans. Linn. Soc.SerP Zool.Vol.'^-IPI.JO.
y'-i'ii-Dv-- ;'•■.■!£. Oel a6 r^i
V^fft,Nffv,Tnar-- ■.
ENTOMOSTRACA FROM GULP OF GUrNRA.
Soott.
Trams. Limit Sc:-. ?e.-r2.
VL.Fin.
Andrew Scott del ai Tiat.
F.NTOMOSTRACA FPvOl/T GULF OF GUINEA
Wesx. r'ie>i-ji3J3 5:C?
.)Ci 'I,, I.
Trans. Lin N. Soc . Si:r.2 , ZoohNoh}!] PL 12 .
'iffejt,N-wni,5ii «. C :
ENIOMOSTRACA FROM GULP OP GUnKTEA.
'I'RAtlsLlMN.Soc.OER S.ZOOL VolV[.1-'1 13.
EMTOMOSTRACA FROM GULF OF GUINEA
"//cTt.NfWEfiaiJ J.'- '
ScoLL.
TRANs.LrNN.Soc.Zool.SEB,.2.VbI\'iP1.14.
^^.>
'f
21
#
21
a K
■^:|-
^•9
%:
^-
',-'^
■^.
A/ J;
2:3
' I ^f
l-^-
f
?8
"^in
-/■■
rtii
,«^ V,
trf^
X
W
6
f%
.iJ'?-!.
f%
J2
^^ '^
^e?
■Hir"
^^E
Xii^-
, 50
'> 1.
51
AnoLre-w Sg- :>tx d^.adi
\i 3J
J^J
J6 '*■•-
■ «rA^
ENTOMOSTRACA FROM GULF OF GUmEA.
■.v^t :^£r.-/TW^Ln,litl\.
Scott.
Trails. LiNTsr. Soc.Zoo1.Ser. 2 .Vol\ .PI 15.
4V\
5
X
li — «^-4;i.
X ,<«i
^^
,rv
*
.V-?^V!
■4, V v.
./
/
kTT^/'
v-s
A-TKice^^ Sf-ott dp-l -ad na'
WeBt. .Nevcm^-tr- lim.
EKTTOMOSTRACA FROM GUIF OE GUINEA.
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMORANDA CONCEllNING TJIANSACTIONS.
Tlie First Scries of tho Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may
be obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and 6s. to Fellows ; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows
Tho Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections,
various parts wliich have been published of these are aa undermentioned :
The prices of the
Volume.
VThen
Published.
Price to the
Public.
£ s. d.
Second Series.— Zoology.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 . .
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 . .
Part III. 1876 ] 8 0 . .
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 . .
Part V. 1877 0 18 0 . .
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 . .
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 . .
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 ..
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 , .
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 . .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 . .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 . .
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 ..
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 . .
Part Yll. 1883 0 5 0 . .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 ..
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 . .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 . .
Part XL 1884 0 10 0 . .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 . .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 ..
Part XIV. 1885 0 6 0 . .
Part XV. 1885 0 4 6 . .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 . .
PartXVII. 1886 0 3 0 . ,
PartXVlII.1888 0 2 6 . ,
III. Pari I. 1884 1 14 0 . .
Part II. 1884 1 12 0 . .
Part III. 1885 1 10 0 . .
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0 . ,
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0 .
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0 . ,
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 .
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0 . .
Part II. 1888 0 5 0 .
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 .
Part IV. 1890 0 12 0 .
Part V. 1890 0 6 0 .
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0 . ,
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 .
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 .
Part IX. 1892. . . . 0 12 0 .
Part X. 1893. .... 1 8 0 .
Part XI. (Index) in preparation.
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
0 18 0
Volume.
When
Published.
Price to the
PubUc.
£ s. d.
Second Series. — Botant.
I. Part I. 1875 0 8 0
Part II. 1875 0 16 0
Part III. 1876 0 12 0
Part IV. 1876 0 10 0
Part V. 1878 1 4 0
Part VI. 1879 1 6 0
Part VII. 1880 1 4 0
Part VIII. 1880 1 1 0
Part IX. 1880 1 0 0
II. Part I. 1881 0 12 0
Part II. 1882 0 5 0
Part III. 1883 0 10 0
Part IV. 1883 0 3 0
Part V. 1883 0 3 0
Part VI. 1884 0 13 6
Part VII. 1884 0 9 6
Part VIII. 1884 0 10 0
Part IX. 1886 0 7 0
Part X. 1887 0 3 4
Part XL 1886 0 6 0
Part XIL 1886 0 8 0
PartXIIl. 1887 1 7 0
PartXIV^ 1887 0 7 0
Part XV. 1887 0 10 0
PartXVL 1888 0 2 6
III. Part L 1888 3 12 0
Part IL 1891 0 5 0
Part III. 1891 0 7 0
Part IV. 1891 0 6 0
Part V. 1891 0 6 0 ,
Part VL 1891 0 3 6
Part VII. 1892 0 6 0
PartVIII. 1893 0 6 0
Part IX. 1893 1 8 0 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PAB,T 2.
THE
G^^-L
TRANSACTIONS
OF
A
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
THE SUBTERRANEAN CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND;
WITH SOMK GENERAL REMARKS ON THE FAUNA
OP CAVES AND WELLS.
BY
CHAULES CHILTON, M.A., D Sc, F.L.S.,
RECTOR, DISTRICT HIGH SCHOOI., PORT CHALMERS, NEVf ZEALAND.
LONDON
PRINTED FOE, THK LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
■^ 3I(nj 1894.
[ 163 ]
II. The Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand: with some general Remarks on the
Fauna of Caves and Wells. By Charles Chilton, M.A., B.Sc., F.Z.S., Rector,
District High School, Port Chalmers, Neto Zealand.
Eead 20th April, 1893.
(Plates XVI.-XXIII.)
Contents.
Page
I. Introduction 163
II. Historical Sketch 165
III. History, Distribution, and Occurrence ol the New Zealand Subterranean Crustacea 180
IV. Detailed Descriptions of the New Zealand Subterranean Crustacea 185
Isopoda. The Genus Phreatoicus : P. assiinilis, sp. nov. ; P. ti/picus, Chilton ; Comparison
of the three known species of Phreatoicus ; Special points in the structure of
Phreatoicus ; Affinities of Phreatoicus 185
The Genus Cruretjens : C. fontanus, Chilton 209
Amphipoda. The Genus Crangonyx : C. compactus, Chilton 218
The Genus Oammarus : G. frufjilis, Chilton 226
The Genus Calliopiiwi : C. siibtcrrancrts, Chilton 2.33
Summary of the more important points in Part IV 244
V. The General Fauna of the Subterranean Waters of Canterbury 246
VI. The Canterbury Plains and their Underground Waters 248
VII. Origin of the Subterranean Crustacea 253
VIII. The Special Characteristics of the Subterranean Pauna :
Colour ; Loss of Eyes ; Compensation for Loss of Eyesight ; Food : Arrested Development ;
Habits 259
IX. Bearing.s of the Phenomena of Subterranean Life on the Theory of Descent 266
X. Conclusion 272
XI. Bibliography 273
XII. Explanation of the Plates 281
I. Introdijction.
In the following paper an attempt is made to give a fuller account than has yet been
published of the Blind Crustacea found in the underground waters of the Canterbury
Plains in the South Island of New Zealand. The existence of siroilar Crustacea in
the caves and wells and in the deep waters of lakes in Europe and North America
Las long been known, and has attracted much attention, both because of the inherent
interest of the subject, and because of the bearing that the facts have on some general
questions of Biology connected with the Theory of Descent, particularly on the effects
of use and disuse, and on the influence of the environment on the animals.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 22
164 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
The existence of these animals in New Zealand was first recorded by me [22] about
eleven years ago, but the original descriptions, though fairly accurate so far as they go,
were yery short and meagre, and the figures were rough and crude, and many points
were left on which fuller and more complete information was much to b3 desired.
Moreover, during the time that has elapsed since they were first discovered, much
additional information has been gathered as to their occurrence and distribution, and
no connected account of these has as yet been published. During tha same time, too,
some important works on the Blind Subterranean Crustacea of other parts of the world
have appeared, particularly Packard's work on the Cave Fauna of North America [83],
and Wrzesniowski's very important memoir on "Three Subterranean Amphipoda" [12i].
If we consider the peculiarities of the New-Zealand fauna and flora, and remember
that New Zealand forms by itself a distinct zoological province, which has long been
more or less ^lerfectly isolated from other provinces, we should naturally expect that
the Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand would present us with some new interesting
facts, and that they would differ largely from the similar Crustacea found elsewhere.
This proves to be the case. The Subterranean Crustacean fauna is peculiarly rich, and
much more varied than that of either Europe or North America ; so far as at present
known, it consists of six distinct species, three Amphipods and tlii*ee Isopods, belonging
to five different genera. Of these genera Crangonijx is already known from the
subterranean waters of Europe and North America, but none of the others have been
recorded from underground habitats elsewhere, though one, Gammariis, is more or less
allied to the blind Niphargus of Europe, the species of which were indeed originally
assigned to Oamniarus, and are still so assigned by some writers. Two genera are
new : one, Cruregens, belongs to a family, the Anthur'ulx, no members of which were
previously known to inhabit underground waters, and the other, Phreafolous, which
now contains three species (two from the subterranean waters of New Zealand, and
one freshwater one from the top of the Mt. Kosciusko plateau in Australia), is so peculiar
that it forms the type of a new and very remarkable family of the Isopoda.
In the following pages I give a full detailed description of the external anatomy of
each of these six species, in addition to the brief specific diagnoses and, usually, a
discussion on the characters of the genus. I have given what is known of their occurrence
and distribution, of their habits, and of the p:^culiarities which they present in common
with or in addition to other Subterranean Crustacea ; their probable origin is discussed
at some length. I have given also a short historical introduction showing the growth
of our knowledge on t!ie subject of Cave and Well Sessile-eyed Crustacea; and have
concluded with some remarks on the bearing of the facts presented by them on the
general questions of Biology.
For their kindness in providing me with material, I have to record my best thanks
to Mr. E.. M. Laiug, of the Christchurch Boys' High School, Mr. E. Wilkinson, of the
School of Agriculture, Lincoln, Messrs. J. B. Mayne and W. W. Smith of Ashburton,
Mr. D. L. luwood and Miss Young of Winchester. Mr. W. P. Hciy of Irvington,
Indiana, U.S.A., lias kindly supplied me Avith specimens of some North-American
Subterranean Crustacea. Mr. Smith, of Ashl)urt<)u, has been particulai-ly zealous and
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 1G5
iiiiwctiiyiiig in liis efforts to obtain specimens for me, and I am much indebted to
])im tor additional knowledge on their distribution and on the general question of
the underground -waters of the plains. My friend and fellow-worker, Mr. G. M.
Thomson, Science Master of tlie Dunedin High Schools, has assisted me in many ways
by his advice and criticism, and by bis kindness in supplying me with works from
his library that I could not otherwise have obtained. To many writers I am
indebted for copies of their various papers, particularly to Professor A. S. Packard
and to Dr. E. Monicz, wlio have sent me copies of important works by them on the
subterranean fauna of their respective countries; while, in common with all other
workers on the Amphipoda, I am greatly indebted to the Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing for the
very full and valuable Bibliographical Introduction to his Report on the ' Challenger '
Amphipoda. Situated as I am at the Antipodes, far from tlie chief biological libraries
of Europe and America, to which one would have Hked to have recourse, I can perhaps
appreciate the full ^alue of this introduction better than those who are more favourably
circumstanced in this respect.
II. Historical Sketch.
The following historical sketch of the growth of our knowledge of the Sessile-eyed
Crustacea inhabiting caves and wells is in many respects very imperfect, for I am
unable to consult many of the original papers and works quoted; it contains, however,
1 trust, references to most of the more important works on the subject. In its
compilation I have derived much assistance from Alois Humbert's paper on Niphargus
indemms, var. Fovelu [62], Professor Packard's paper on the " Cave Fauna of North
America" [83], from Wrzesniowski's work on " Three Subterranean Amphipoda" [121],
and fiom the bibliographical introduction to Stebbing's " Report on the ' Challeno"er '
Amphii oda " [108]. 1 have endeavoured to include the Subterranean Isopoda as well
as the Ami)hipoda, but the parts bearing on them are, I fear, much more incomplete
than those on the Amphipoda, as there is no general bibliography on the Isopoda at all
comparable to that which Stebbing has compiled with so much care and labour for
the Amphipoda.
Feanz von I'abla Schkank, in his account of Gammarus pidex [98, p. 535] says, "Habitat in aquis,
rivis,fontibns ; albissimu.s dum iicitat." From the -Nvorils " in fontibus ; albissimus dum natat " Stebbing
[108, p. 31] thinKs it is fair to infer that Scbrank had seen one of the well-shrimps. I£ this be so it
would appear that we have in this work of Schrank (1781) the first mention of Subterranean Crustacea.
W. E. Leach [72]. The first undoubted reference to "well-shrimps" ajjpears to have been made
bj Leach. In the article " Crustaceology " in the ' Edinburgh Encyclopaedia,' published probably in
1813-1814, after Gaviiitarus pulex a species is mentioned [72, p. 403] which is not numbered but
" which Mr. Leach considers to be different from pulex." It came from a well in London. " It
diflers principally from Gummarus imkx in having the upper process of the tail much longer. The
colour, when alive, was cinereous, but so translucent that the eyes could not be distinguished. It
stimds in Mr. Leach's cabinet under the specific name subterraneus." It is evident from this brief
description that the animal in question is not a true Guvnnarus, but is a subterranean species, probably
a Nipfiargus. Stebbing [108, [>. 84] thinks it is probably identical with Niphargus aquilex, Schiodte,
22*
166 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
and it is assigned to tliis species also by Spence Bate and Westwood [4, p. 316]. Wrzesniowski [121',
p. 6021 thinks that the description given is scarcely sufficient to enable us to decide whether the animal
belongs to Niphargus aquilex, Schiodte, or Crangowjx compactus, Spence Bate ; but in the latter
species the terminal uropoda are not very long, and, as Leach specially mentions that they are long in
his specimen, it appears more likely that it is a Niphargus.
I. C. Zenker. From a remark made by Zenker in connection with Gammarus pulex, Leydig infers
[73, p. 245], and according to Wrzesniowski [124, p. 602] with good reason, that Zenker had met
with Niphargus puteanus in Thuringia.
Paul Gervais, in 1835, in a paper [46] describing the freshwater Gammarids of Paris, after giving
the two species Gammarus pulex, Fabr., and G. Roeselii {=G. fluviatills, Roesel), says: "There is also
found in the environs of Paris, but only in the water from wells, a third kind of shrimp, remarkable
for its small size, which does not in fact exceed 3 or 4 mm." He considers this simply a " variete de
sejour," and draws attention to its slender appearance — " est constamment etiolee " — and to the fact
that its eyes are without pigment and not apparent. He names it Gammarus pulex minutus [46, p. 127].
This name he afterwards altered to Gammarus lacteus, but without giving any further description of
any value [47, p. 488] .
C. L. Koch [69]. About the same time Koch described a species under the name Gammarus
puteanus from wells at Ratisbon (" Regensburg "), giving the following diagnosis: " G. diaphano-
albus, lateribus suboehraceis, testis caudse iuermibus ; articulo penultimo pedum 4 anteriorum
quadrato." He does not describe it as blind, but says "Die Augen sind gelb" [69, h. 5, n. 2].
Wrzesniowski gives the species under the provisional name Niphargus ratisbonensis ? [124, p. 673].
Later on Koch describes a variety found " in den Brunnen der Stadt Zweibriicken," differing from the
specimens from Ratisbon in colour and in the shape of the hands of the guathopoda [69, h. 36, n. 22] .
KocVs work was issued in parts, and it appears to be very difficult to determine the exact date at
which each part appeared. See Stebbing [108, p. 158] .
H. Milne-Edwards, in 1840, describes Gammarus pungens [77, iii. p. 47], from " les eanx thermales
du Mont Cassini en Italic," as having " le petit appendice terminal des dernieres fausses pates
tout-k-fait rudimentaire, et le grand appendice ti-es-poilu et il peine epineux." Spence Bate [5, p. 217,
& 4, p. 314] and Stebbing [108, p. 253] consider this a Niphargus. At the same time Milne-Edwards
also describes another species, Gammarus Ermannii \77, iii. p. 49], from warm springs of Kamtschatka;
Spence Bate, who saw the specimen preserved in the Museum of the .Tardin des Plantes, afterwards
placed this species under the genus Crangonyx [5, p. 179].
Theodor G. Tellkampf, in 1844, in describing some new species of Arthropoda from the Mammoth
Cave of Kentucky, gives, under the head of " Crustacea, Malacostraca," the species Triura cavernicola
[109, pp. 321, 322, pi. 18]. Schiodte and afterwards Boeck suggested that the species belonged to the
Amphipoda, and Dana (Choristopoda, p. 306), in a note says : — "Genus Triura, Tellkampf, Rhoeee
forsan affinis." Stebbing [108, p. 208], after giving a portion of TellkarapPs description, gives also a
copy of his figure, and says that it will suffice to show that tiic animal cannot belong to the Amphipoda.
A. S. Packard, junr., had, moreover, already shown in 1871 that the animal is not a Crustacean at all,
but belongs to the Thysanurous Neuroptera, and that it is probably the same as Marhilis variabilis,
Say : Tellkampf's erroneous reference of the animal to the Crustacea having been caused by his
mistaking the labial and maxillary palpi for feet, and regarding the nine pairs of abdominal spines as
feet [82, p. 14] .
J. C. Schiodte, in 1847, briefly communicated to the Academic des Sciences dc Copeuhague the
results of his researches on the fauna of the caves of Carniola and Istria, and gives a short diagnosis of
Gammarus stygius [93, p. 81]. In a later work, published 1849-51, he minutely described the species,
figured it, and formed for it the new genus Niphargus [91, pp. 26-28]. According to Humbert [62,
p. 283] he did not notice the great resemblances between his species and Gammarus puteanus, Koch.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 167
In the same paper, Schiiidtc also describes with great fulness, and figures, Pherusa alba, Koch, an
isopod belonging to the OniscidiE. As the name Pherusa was preoccupied, he renames the species
Titanethes albus, placing it in " Ordo Isopoda — Familia 0«/sc('— Tribus Oniscini." Owing to Koch's
use of the name Pherusa, earlier employed among the Anijjhipoda, it appears that Schiodte's Titanethes
has itself been spoken of as an Amphipod. With regard to this species, Spence Bate [4, ii. p. 440] gives
the reference "' Herrich Schaffer, Contin. of Panzer,' fasc. 180, pi. 24," and this, together with the
above quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 24], is all the informatiou I can gather on this species.
HoBERT Caspary [19], in 1849, gave a full account with figures of Gammarus puteanus, Koch, from
specimens found at Elberfeld. He was not able to discover eyes, although he examined more than 30
specimens. The small size of his specimens (4-6 mm.) and the absence of eggs from the brood-pouches
of the females show, says Wrzesniowski [124, p. 603], that he had to deal with very young specimens.
He considers the mouth-parts, but, according to Wrzesniowski [124, p. 603], gives an incorrect figure
of the palp of the first maxillae.
In his list [15] giving the synonymy of Asellus sieboIdU, de Rougemont { = A. cavaticus, Schiodte),
Bovallius gives a reference to this pa])er by Caspary, as follows : — " 1849 Fulilrott. (Caspary), in
Verhandl. des naturh. Vereins dcr preuss. llheinlande uud Westfalens, Jahrg. 6, fig. ; " thus without
mentioning any name as used by Caspary. I am unable to consult Caspary's paper, and therefore cannot
say what information, if any, he gives on Asel/ns cavaticus. Accoi-ding to Packard [83, p. 146], Caspary
gives a " figure, without name, of Asellus cavaticus, Leydig." The next entry in Bovallius's list of
synonyms is under the date 1871 [15, p. 11].
A. Hosius [61], in 1850, sets forth very fully the characters which separate the three species, Gam-
marus pulex from running waters, Gammarus fluviatilis ( = G. Roselii, Gervais) from still or weakly
flowing waters, and Gammarus puteanus from wells. He compares the three species as regards the
maxillae, and gives two drawings of the maxilhe of G. puteanus, taken from Caspary, and retaining the
erroneous figuring of the palp. The incorrectness was also pointed out by Spence Bate and Westwood
[4, i. p. 311].
A. Costa [32], in 1851, gives, among others in his list of Amphipoda, Gammarus lomjicaudatus from
the drinking-water of Naples, and G. montanus from the Lago del Maltese. Afterwards he admitted
that the two were the same, and the first as " Gammarus longicaudata," A. Costa, appears alone in his
Catalogue [see Stebbing, 108, p. 249]. Wrzesniowski gives the species under Nipharyus [124,
p. 696-7]. Spence Bate and Westwood, without comment, give it as a synonym of Niphargus aquilex,
Schiodte [4, i. p. 316].
J. 0. Westwood [120], in April 1853, communicated to the Linneau Society the discovery of a well-
shrimp in a well near Maidenhead, England. This was at the time referred to Niphargus stygius,
Schiodte, hut was afterwards separated under the name Niphargus aquilex by Schiodte [95, pp. 349-
351]. Bate and Westwood point out that Schiodte has been misled into describing it with " dorso
carinato " by examining dried specimens, but they retain his name Niphargus aquilex on other grounds
[4, i. p. 317].
In an anonymous paper on some Crustacea [57], quoted by Stebbing thus : — "Anonymous (? Halli-
day)," Latin diagnoses of the genus Niphargus and the two species iV. sti/gius and A'^. aquilex are given.
The full account of the former is given in English as applying equally well to the latter, except for the
differences mentioned in the diagnoses. As these amounted to little more than applying a smooth
back to A^. stygius, and by mistake a keeled one to N. aquilex, Spence Bate was, he says, misled by this
to assume the identity of the two species.
Adam White [121] in Lis ' Popular History of British Crustacea,' in 1857, omits the Gammarus
subterraneus. Leach, which he had previously suggested might be " Gammarus pulex, var. jun. ?." He
changes Niphargus stygius, Westwood, into Niphargus aquilex, Schiodte, and asks whether this may not
be the Gammarus subterraneus of Leach [see 108, p. 305].
168 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
A. DE LA Valette St. George [112], ill 1857, publislied a very minute account of tlie external and
internal anatomy of the well-sbrimps found at Cologne and Munich. He calls the species examined by
him Gammarus imteanus, but they are referred by Bate and Westwood to Niphargus aquilex, Schiiidte
[4, i. p. 315]. His work is illustrated by fine figures, and among other points he draws attention to the
sense-organs found on the autenuse, remarking, howevei', that the caleeoli increase in size towards the
end of the antennse, which, as Stebbing points out [108, p. 304], is certainly not the case iu all
Ampliipoda.
C. Chyzer, iu 1858 [28, p. 4], announces Toth's finding Gammarus puteanus and G. fossarwm, Koch,
" im Orczy-Garten zu Pest."
C. Spence Bate [6] in 1859, in a paper on the genus Niphargus, Schiodte, establishes two new
species, A^. fontanus and N. Kochianus, and also describes a new genus, Crangony.r, with the species
C. subterraneus. Some discussion on the genus Crangonyx will be found further on (pp. 215-326).
R. M. Bruzelius [17], in 1859, established the new genus Eriupis, vi'\t\x the species E. elongata,
" habitat in loeis profundis maris Bohusise." The genus Eriopis is evidently very close to Niphargus,
Schiodte, with which it was identified by Boeck. Stebbing also accepts this view; Wrzesniowski, how-
ever, retains it as a separate genus, but alters the name to Eriojjsis, as Eriojns was preoccupied [124,
p. 634].
A. R. HoGAN [59 and 60], in 1859, published a paper on the habits, food-supply, and habitat of the
species described by Spence Bate, viz., Niphargus Kochianus, N. fontanus, and Crangomjx subterraneus.
In his notice of this paper Stebbing mentions that specimens of Niphargus aquikw, from a well near
Tunbridge Wells, lived in his (Stebbing's) room from January 1886 till March 3rd, 1880, wheu they all
died at about the same time, perhaps from the coldness of the night. Although they were very active
in walking aljout the bottom of their jar, Stebbing never saw them attempt to swim. Another set of
about a dozen were placed in a small jar on June 15th, 1880. Two were females with eggs ; these died
within a couple of days, surrounded by some rapidly developed parasitic growth ; the others lived on for
a considerable time, the last not dying until November 24th, 1880 [108, p. 310]. Wrzesniowski [124,
p. 604] refers to these observations on the habits of Niphargus aquilex in captivity as though they had
been made by Hogan — a mistake natural enough, considering the way in which they are incorporated
with the notice of Hogan's paper. Hogan published another paper on the same subject in 1801 [00].
Johannes Lachmann [71], in 1859, describes parasites found in the intestine of the well-shrimp {Gam-
tuarus puteanus) , the name being, however, misspelt "Grammarus" throughout the paper. The parasites
are said to belong to the puzzling group of the Gregarines. (Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 317].)
Joseph Schobl [92] in 1800 published an elaborate monogra^ih, illustrated by 10 plates, on " Typhlo-
niscus — eine neue bliude Gattuug der Crustacea Isopoda," in which he describes the new species Typhlo-
niscus Steinii. This species, which belongs to the Oniscidse, is not an inhabitant of wells or caves, but
lives, like Platyarthrus, iu ants' nests. It, however, resembles cave-species in the want of eyes, colour of
the body, &c., and has been often mentioned as a blind Isopod along with Titanethes albus. This
species was afterwards referred to Platyarthrus Huffmannseggii by Budde-Lund [18, p. 199].
Victor Sill [100], in 1861, repeats Koch's description of^ Gammarus puteanus, but without adding
anything new.
Spence Bate, in the 'Catalogue of the Amphipoda in the British Museum,' published iu 1862 [5],
gives the following subterranean species, all of which have been already referred to : — Niphargus stygius,
SeliiiJdte, with which he combines N. aquilex, Schiodte (though on further examination this was retained
as a separate species) ; N. fontanus, Spence Bate; N. Kochianus, Spence Bate; N. puteanus, Koch; Cran-
qonyx subterraneus, Spence Bate; and C. Ermannii= Gammarus Ermannii, M.ilne-l!ldwa,rd&. He leaves
Gammarus pungens, Milne-Edwards, under the genus Ganmiarus, but adds as a footnote, " This species
appears closely to resemble a Niphargus " [5, p. 217].
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND 169
Bate and Westwood [4]. The parts of the' History of the British Sessile-eyed Crustacea,' by these
authors, wliich contained the account of the subterranean forms, apjieared in 1862 [Stebbing, 108,
p. 340], though the titlepage of volume i. bears the date 1863. A fuller account of the species already
mentioned is given, there is a sliort account of some of the previous works on the subject and of the
habits of some of the species, and Nipkiirr/iis aquilc.r, Schiodte, is reinstated as a separate species distinct
from N. stijfjius, Schiodte. Under N.fontaniis, the authors say : — " Professor Westwood thinks that this
species may be identical with the iV. sfi/ffius of Schiiidte, since both agree in the more robust form of
the animal and the shape of the hands; there are, however, other important differences ; as, for instance,
the form of the second and third segments of the tail, which, together with the diversity of liabitat,
will probably prove to be of specific value" [t, i. p. 322]. Again, under N. Kochianus they say : —
"We are inclined to think this species identical with the specimens captured at Bonn, described and
figured by Caspary and Hosius, referred to in the synonyms under JSf. aquUe.v, but want of specimens
from tliat locality prevents our determining this point" [4, i. p. 325].
In speaking of the three species N. af/ni/ce, iV. fontanus, and N. Kochianus, Alois Humbert very
shrewdly remarks : — -"A n'en juger que par les descriptions et par les figures intercalees dans le texte
ces trois especes semblent etre bien tranchees et faciles a distinguer, mais dans la pratique la determina-
tion n'est pas facile " [62, p. 287].
De Rougemont has, indeed, united N. font anus and N. Kochianus, as well as Cranqonyj: subtcrraneus
with Gammarus puteanus,}Loc\\; but, as will be seen from the remarks below, his identifications can
hardly all be accepted. Stebbing says, in connection with this point that " the matter, perhaps, is not
yet ripe for final determination" [108, p. 312].
It is strange that so little has been written on the Subterranean Crustacea of England : thus I know of
no special work on them since the publication of the ' History of the British Sessile-eyed Crustacea ; '
this is the more peculiar when we remember that many points in connection with them were left uncer-
tain {Cramiomjx suhterraneus, for instance, being described from a single specimen), and that they are
widely distributed in England and Ireland, and probably abundant.
Camil Heller [58] , in his list of the freshwater Amphipoda of South Europe, says that they all belong
to the genus Gammams, Fabric., of which he makes Crangonyx and Niphargus subgenera. He omits
Costa's G. Jongicaudatus, and unites Gammarus puteanus, Caspary, Niphargus stygius, Schiiidte, and
N.aquilex, Schiiidte, but, according to Wrzesniowski, without giving good reasons for so doing [124,
p. 604].
Among the freshwater Crustacea mentioned by Heller is Crangonyx recurvus, Grube, which had been
found by Grube in 1861 in the Vrana lake in the Island of Cherso, on the Illyrian coast, and described
under the name Gammarus recurvus, and was afterwards redescribed by him and placed under Vranqonyx.
I regret that I have been unable to get a description of this species, as it would have been interesting to
see what relation it bears to the various Subterranean Crustacea of Europe.
Pratz [88], in 1867, described under the name Gammarus Caspary a new species from a well at
Munich, and mentions several remarkable differences between the male and female. In view of the
" caracteres contradictoires " presented by this species, and the " polymorphisme " of the Gammari
found in the same town by de Rougemont, Moniez tliinks [78, p. 18] that it is very desirable that the
Gammari of the wells at Munich should be re-studied.
W. CzERNiAvsKi [33] , in 1868, described a new species of Niphargus, from the Black Sea, under the name
N. ponticns. This species differs from the usual species of Niphargus in the presence of well-developed
eyes, in the colour, the gnathopoda, &c. ; and from the small size (2'1 millim.), and the small number
of joints in the flagella of the antennae, it is probable that the single specimen obtained was, as
Wrzesniowski points out [124, p. 605], a young specimen, and further information regarding the sjiecics
is desirable.
F. Plateau [86] . in his researches on the freshwater Amphipoda of Belgium, inakes special mention of
170 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
the well-shrimps which he had taken at Ghent, and which had also been collected by Professor Bellynck at
Namur. He calls his specimens Gaminarus puteanus, Koch, and states that they have triangular,
pigmentless eyes. Plateau appears to have been acquainted only with Koch's work on Niphargus, and
ignores the works of later writers.
GusTAV Joseph [65], in 1868, recorded the finding of a new species of Niphargus, N. orcinus, in the
brooks of the hill- grottoes of Carniola, "which probably from these reaches the lake of Zirlenitz [Zirk-
nitz], where it can be freely gathered. It comes to the surface after sunset in calm weather." — See
Stebbing [108, p. 384]. The full description of this species was not given till 1882.
F. A. FoREL [38J, in 1869, indicated for the first time the existence of blind Gammarids from the
deep waters of the Lake of Geneva. Afterwards, in 1873, similar animals were found in the Lake of
Neuchatel.
BoECK [14], in his work published in 1870, gives the genus Niphargus, Schiodte, for the single
marine species Eriopis elongatus, Bruzelius.
Paul Godet [48, p. 153], in 1871, described three specimens of a Gammarus found in a well at
Neuchatel, pointing out the characters by which they differ from Gammarus fluviaiilis, and comparing
them with G. puteanus, Koch, and G. puteanus, La Valette. Stebbing says that, judging by the figui'C,
it cannot be far removed from Niphargtis aquilex, Schiodte [108, p. 1630].
A notice of Godet's observations on these well-shrimps had been previously communicated to the
Societe des Sciences natureUes de Neuchatel, by P. Coulou, in 1867. See Wrzesniowski [124,
p. 605] .
S. I. S.vuTH [102], in 1871, among other Crustacea dredged from Lake Superior, in North America,
describes Crangonyx gracilis. Smith, n. s., and says that it much resembles C. recurvatus [yecurvus^,
Grube, " in the form of the antennulte, antennae, gnathopoda, &c., while it differs much in the ultimate
pleopoda and in the form of the telson." It is important to note the occurrence of this species, though
not blind, in connection with the question of the distribution and origin of the subterranean forms.
A. S. Packard, Jun. [81], 1871, iu describing the Crustaceans and Insects of the Mammoth Cave,
describes an Isopod as a new genus and species under tlie name Ccecidotea stygia. This species was
described from imperfect specimens, and its structure and affinities were consequently completely
misunderstood. In point of fact it has nothing whatever to do with Idotta, but comes very close to
Asellus, with which it is indeed united by Forbes [41, p. 11]. It will be further noticed in the account
of Packard's larger work on the ' Cave Fauna of North America ' [83].
E. D. Cope [30, pp. 6 and 14], in 1872, found iu a cave adjoining the Wyandotte Cave an Isopod
which he refers to the genus Ccecidotea, previously established by Packard, but describes it as a new
species, C. microcephala. He gives a description and figure of the species, but owing to imperfect
specimens his account is even more unsuccessful than Packard's : thus he describes and figures the
uropoda as " egg-pouches full of eggs." This is the species which had been referred to by Cope in a
previous paper as an " unknown Crustacean with external egg-pouches " [29] . Packard has since
united it with his Ctecidotea stygia [83, p. 29].
In the same paper [30, pp. 8 and 17] Cope also describes a blind Amphipod under the name Stygo-
bromus vitreus, nov. gen. et sp. He says that his genus is nearer to the true Gammarus than to
Niphargus, Schiodte ; but his description is very unsatisfactory, and gives no assistance in the attempt to
ascertain the true position of the animal. S. I. Smith afterwards referred this species to Crangonyx
under the name C. vitreus. Cope, and it appears under this name in Packard's larger work [83,
p. 34].
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 171
AltLougli tlescribcd iu Cope's paper " Ou the Wyandotte Cave and its Fauna," this species is not from
that cave, but from the Mammoth Cave, and had been referred to as a " Gammaroid Crustacean " iu an
earlier paper by Cope [29] .
F. Leydig [74, p. 2G9] had, in 1871, i-ecorded the existence of Asellus cavaticus in the Falkenstein
Cave. This species is usually referred to as Asellus cavaticus, Schiodte, and consequently was, I presume,
first mentioned under that name by Schiodte ; but, unfortunately, the works at my disposal do not enable
me to say where Schiodte mentions it, or what information, if any, he gives about it. Bovallius, in his
"Notes on the Family Asellidae," in his list of synonyms of the species, gives no reference to any paper
on the subject by Schiodte, and says, " As Schiodte never has given a diagnosis of A. cavaticus, and
none of the following authors, using that name, did describe the animal, the name A. cavaticus must be
rejected, and substituted by A. Sieboldii, Ph. de Rougemont" [15, p. 11].
A. Fkic [42, p. 246, fig. 95], in 1872, recorded the existence of Gammarus puteamis in wells at
Prague, Bohemia; but, according to Wrzesniowski [124, p. 605], his observations on the subject are of
little value, the third uropods, for example, being represented as seven-jomted !
R. WiEDERSHEiM [122] fouud iu 1873, in a small lake in the Falkenstein Cave, about 600 ft. from
the mouth, an eyeless Gammarid which he does not describe, but believes to be the same as Gammarus
puteamis from wells at Tiibingen.
Apparently also in the same paper he gives an account of the habits of Asellus cavaticus. See Packard
[83, p. 149].
S. Fries [43], in 1874, also studied the fauna of the same cave, but found only one example of
a bHnd Gammarid. lie thinks this to be the descendant of the eyed Gammarus jjule.i: Vw'mg in the
neighbourhood outside the cave, and strengthens his opinion by observations on Gammarus fossarum
kept during the winter in the dark, which lost pigment and whose eyes paled ; but, as Humbert points
out, Fries does not appear to have been acquainted with the genus Nipliart/us and tlie characters bv
which it is distinguished from the true Gam/narus. Sec Humbert [62, p. 289]. Fries also appears to
have referred in his paper to Asellus cavaticus, Schiodte.
F. A. FoREL, in a series of works on the deep-water fauna of the Lake of Geneva, repeatedly mentions
an interesting crustacean under the name Gammarus ccecus. This, I presume, is the species afterwards
fully described by Humbert under the name Niphargus puteanus, var. Forelii [<i2].
Eugene Simon [101], in 1875, enumerates and shortly describes several species of Crustacea living
in caves, among them " Nipliaryus subterraneus [Letich) =putea)rus (C. Koch), aqullex, and stygius,
(Schiodte), Carniola, also in wells." (Dr. von Martens, ' Zoological Record' for 1875.)
Ph. de Rougemont [89], in 1875, published an exhaustive paper on Gammarus puteanus, Koch. He
had found five different forms in a well at Munich and a sixth form at Neuehatel, the last having been
previously described by Godet. He fully describes the various sense-organs, recognizes the olfactory
cylinders on the flagellum of the upper antcunte as organs of smell, and explains the fact that they
are longer in the blind Gammarus jmteanus and Asellus from wells than in Gammarus pulex and Asellus
aquaticus as a natural compensation made to the former for their want of sight.
De Rougemont was astonished to find five different forms so nearly allied living together iu a
single well, and at not finding any small forms similar to the larger kinds ; consequently he came to the
conclusion that all these five kinds as well as the large one from Neuehatel are simply difl'erent stages
in the life-history of the one species, and he states that he has seen individuals pass at the moulting
of the exoskeleton from the first form [Crangonyx subterraneus) to the second {Niphargus Kochianus),
and that he has seen the transformation also from the fourth form into the fifth. He concludes there-
fore that the genera Crangonyx and Niphargus ought not to be separated, since they represent different
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 23
172 DK. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
states of the same species, and further lie proposes to suppress the genus Niphargus, as he considers it
only a modification of Gammarus pulex. To the single species Gammarus piiteanus, Koch, he therefore
refers all the following forms : — I. Form : Gammarus minutus, Gervais ; Crangonyw subterraneus, Spence
Bate. II. Form : Niphargus Kochianus, Spence Bate. III. Form : Gammarus puteanus, Caspary :
Gammarus puteanus, Hosius ; Wiphargus fontarius, Spence Bate. IV. Form : Gammarus puteanus,
Koch. V. Form : Niphargus stygius, Schiodte ; Gammarus puteanus, Koch, La Valette St. George,
and Plateau. A^I. Form : a colossal specimen, 33 millim. long, from Neuchatel.
These conclusions arrived at by de Rougemont have been very fully criticized by Alois Humbert [62,
])p. 294^296], Wrzesniowski [124, pp. 687-694], and others, who have shown that, in addition to the
inherent improbability of some of de Rougemont's assertions, there are so many inaccuracies, incon-
sistencies, and contradictions in his own worlv and such neglect to notice points of special importance, as,
for example, the difference between the undivided telson of Crangonyw and the deeply-cleft telson of
Niphargus, that de Rougemont's views cannot be seriously accepted. It is therefore unnecessary to
discuss the subject further, and I need only say that I feel quite convinced of the justice and truth of
the remarks made on the matter by Humbert and Wrzesniowski. It is of course quite possible that some
of the various subterranean species described under Nip ha?-g us [Gammarus) are not entitled to full specific
rank, but should rather be looked upon as local varieties, which, indeed, we might naturally expect to
arise owing to isolation ; but certainly we cannot admit that all the forms mentioned by de Rougemont
are modifications due to age, and if Crangonyx subterraneus, Spence Bate, can change at a single moult
into Niphargus KocManus, Spence Bate, it will be useless to attempt to classify Araphipoda into genera
and species at all. The existence of five different forms in the single well at Munich, if this really was
the case, is not so strange or so unprecedented as de Rougemont seems to have thought it, for the space in
which they li^c is of course not merely the well itself, but the subterranean waters connected therewith,
which may be very extended ; and Spence Bate had previously recorded the three species Niphargus
fontanus, N. Kochianus, and Crangonyx subterraneus from the same well at Ringwood, England, while
Wrzesniowski lias since recorded the two species Niphargus tatrensis and Boruta tenebrarum living together
in one well ; and I have taken from a single well at Eyretoii the three Amphipods Calliopius subterraneus,
Gammarus fragilis, and Crangonyx coinpactus, as well as the two Isopods Cruregens fontanus and
Phreatoicvs typicus.
A year later, in 1876, de Rougemont published a French translation of his paper on Gammarus
puteanus under the title " Etude de la Faune des eaux privees do la lumiere," and this contained in
addition a description of the Isopod Asellus Sieboldii, which Bovallius identified with the A. cavaticus,
Schiodte, of earlier writers, though he retains de Rougemont's name, as he was the first to describe the
species [15, p. 11].
S. I. Smith, 1874, in a work on the Crustacea of the fresh waters of the United States [103], describes
both sexes of Crangonyx gracilis, Smith, an eyed species that has been already mentioned. He also
mentions Crangonyx vitreiis, Packard, giving under protest Stygobromus vitreus, Cope, as a synonym ;
Packard, however, in his last work keeps the two separate [83, p. 34] .
Smith also describes Crangonyx tenuis, u. s., " a slender, elongated species with very low epimera,
resembling more in form the species of Niphargus than the typical species of Crangonyx."
In 1875, S. I. Smith [104], in a paper on the Crustaceans of the Caves of Kentucky and Indiana,
states that Crangonyx (Stygobromus) ritreus, Cope, is very different from Crangonyx vitreus, Packard,
of which he had previously, as above stated, given it as a synonym under protest. The latter species is, he
says, closely allied to C. gracilis. Smith, from Michigan, Lake Superior, &c., differing principally in the
structure of the eyes. In his account of this paper, Stebbing adds, " Since Packard's species in any
case must yield its specific name, one is led by Professor Smith's account to regard it as a synonym of
Crangonyx gracilis " [108, p. 451]. Packard afterwards refers to the species as C. Pachardii, Smith ; but
I am unable to find when this name was assigned to it.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 173
S. A. Forbes [41] , in 187G, desCTibes an Amphipod found in a well at Normal, Illinois, under
the name Cranyonyx inucronatus. This species is, he says, perhaps entitled to rank as the type
of a new genus, but for want of material for a more general study of its relations it is left with its
nearest allies in the genus Crangonyx. The difl'erences between the sexes are given, the most
remarkable being in connection with the telson, which is very largely developed in the male. (See
below, pp. 218-219.)
AiiOis Humbert [62] published his description of Niphargus puteanus, var. Forelii, in 187G. Besides
a very careful and minute description of this variety, and of another named oncsiensis, this work contains
much important information on the general subject of blind subterranean Crustacea. After some
introductory remarks he gives an historical sketch of previous works on the subject, in the course of
which he fully criticizes de Rougemont's views as already stated, and pointed out that liis own
observations do not at all correspond with those of de Rougemont : thus among the specimens handed
to him by Professor Forcl were some very small, only 2 millim. long, which should therefore correspond
with de Rougemont's first form, and belong to Crangonyx subterraiieus, Spence Bate; but these,
Humbert says, already had the characters well niarked, the two gnathopods already having the form of
the adult and the telson being deeply cleft. Humbert then considers the characters of the genus
Niphargus, and gives a new definition of it. He discusses the jjlace in the genus of his own varieties,
and compares them with the species previously described by other authors. He distinguishes two
varieties, Niphargus puteanus var. Forelii, from the deep waters of the Lake of Geneva, and N. puteanus
var. onesiensis, from a well at Onex near Geneva, and gives at length the minute differences between
the two. In considering the origin of the Niphargus found in the Lake of Geneva, he gives good reasons
for believing that it is not merely a modification of Ganimarus jnilex, and concludes that it is probably
descended from an ancient genus now extinct ; he is inclined to think the Niphargi of the lakes come
fi'om those in the subterranean waters. This point was afterwards fully considered by Professor Forel,
who finally came to the same conclusion as Humbert, though he had previously thought otherwise [40.
pp. 170-18.}].
In the detailed description of Niphargus puteanus, var. Forelii, that follows;, Humbert pays special
attention to the various organs of sense. On the head and on the first segments of the pereion, on the
dorsal portion, are found " capsules sensitives," and on the upper antennae " cylindres olfactifs,"
" batonnets hyalins," " soies auditives," and also " capsules sensitives " like those on the head, &c.
The females are said to be distingiiished from the males by their smaller size, the brood-plates, and the
shorter length of the terminal ui'opoda.
P. GoDET [49], in 1878, was induced by Humbert's criticism of de Rougemont's work to rectify his
measurements of the large specmien from Neuchatcl, as his measurements previously given had not
corresponded with those given by de Rougemont. In connection herewith de Rougemont stated that he
still held to his opinions previously published.
J. D. Catta [20], in 1878, described a new species of Amphipod, Gammarus rhipidiophorus, found only
in a well at La Ciotat (Bouches-du-Rhone, France), a hundred yards or so from the Mediterranean; the
water in the well becomes brackish in summer. He considers that the genus Niphargus should be given
up, as the various diflerences between them are more or less bridged over by different species. In
connection with this question, howevei', Wrzesniowski pointy out [121, p. 007] that Catta says nothing
about the mouth-parts, in which arc found some of the most prominent marks of distinction ; and
Stebbing also says : — " The discovery of transition-forms between two genera will always cause some
difficulty, but as such forms have j)i'obably existed in innumerable cases where they have not been
discovered, it is a question how far the discovery of them should be allowed to interfere with well-
established distinctions either of genera or species. When Niphargus aquilex and Gammarus pulex are
side by side, it is rather the difierencc of i\\e fades than the likeness which attracts attention " [108,
p. 475]. It may here be added, the differences originally laid down between Niphargus and Crangonyx
23*
174. DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERKANEAN
have to some extent been bridged over in the same way by species subsequently described, but that still
the differences between Gammarus, Nipharr/us, and Cranyonyx are much greater thau those between
many other genera of the Amphipoda. The main interest in the discussion is its bearing on the
question — Have all the species classed under, say, Niphargus, arisen from the parent genus, whatever it
may be, by one common oriu:in, or have some of them arisen independently in different localities in
which they have been isolated ?
Franz Leydig [73], 1878, in his remarks on the anatomy &c. of Amphipoda and Isopoda makes a
good many references to the subterranean forms. With regard to the plumose bristles called " capsules
sensitives " by Humbert, he says that they may be sensitive, but they are not capsules, they are modified
pores. " In view of the very varying statements of authors on the eye of Gammarus puteanus, he made
investigations from which he determines that the optic ganglion is present, but not the eye, though
pigment-spots mimicking the eye have led some observers to believe that an eye existed in fact" (quoted
from Stebbiug [108, p. 481]). In connection with this point I may add that I have occasionally
observed similar pigment-spots in the New-Zealand species, in none of which can I find any external
trace of eyes except in Crangomjx compactus, which has two or three imperfect lenses ; some of the cave-
inhabiting species of Crangomjx from North America also have imperfect external eyes. It seems
probable that there may be great differences in the amount of degeneration of the eyes in different
species, and perhaps also in individuals of the same species from different localities.
In remarking on the distribution of and distinctions between Gammarus pulex, de Geer, Gammarus
fluviatUis, Rosel, and Gammarus (Niphargus) puteanus, Koch, Leydig adopts the view of de Rougemont,
that Gammarus pulex minutus, Gervais, is identical with Koch's G. puteanus, which may, of course, be
correct enough, while de Eougemont's other observations are unreliable.
F. A. FoREL [39], in 1878, in an account of the fauna of the Swiss Lakes, mentions Gammarus
puteanus, var. Forelii, Humbert, as being found in " die tie/e Region " in the Lake of Geneva.
Gtjstav Joseph [66], in 1879, discovered Niphargus puteanus at Venice, and states that their intro-
duction into these carefully-covered wells is best explained by the transport of water from the mainland
to replenish these wells in the dry season.
S. Fries [43], in 1879, discusses the occurrence of Well Shrimps in the slightly brackish wells of
Heligoland, &c., and advocates the view that they must have existed in these localities before the islands
were separated from the mainland. He examined specimens from these wells of Heligoland, from the
Falkenstein Caves, from tlie springs running out of the caverns, from the Hilgerhausen Caves, and from
the depths of the Lake of Geneva, and finds no greater differences than would justify the naming of
varieties. He therefore follows de Rougemont in uniting them all under the name Gammarus puteanus.
From this it appears probable that at any rate some of the described species of Niphargus are to be
looked upon merely as local varieties of one and the same species ; but this in no way justifies de Rouge-
mont's inclusion of Crangonyx subterraneus, Spenee Bate, with the others, and does not support his
statement as to the elaborate series of metamorphoses passed through by the specimens examined by him.
In the same paper Fries also discusses the blind Isopod, Asellus cavaticus, Schiodte. He had
uniformly found this in company with Gammarus puteanus, which, according to de Rougemont, is its
mortal foe. He agrees with do Rougemont that Asellus cavaticus is related to A. aquaticus, very much
as Gammarus puteanus is to G. pulex. Judging, however, from the scanty descriptions of Asellus
cavaticus that I have been able to consult, the connection between the first two appears much closer than
that between the last two.
Fries's remarks lead de Rougemont to repeat that he is still of the same opinion [90],
Professor Giebel [50], iu 1879, mentions the finding of Niphargus puteanus in Halle-a.-S.
Oscar Grimm [51], in 1880, described a new species of Niphargus — N caspius — found in the Caspian
CEU8TACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 175
Sea at a depth of 35 to 90 fatlioms. The species may, he says, be identical with N. ponticus, Czer-
niavski, but he is not able rightly to determine this species, as Czerniavski's description appears to be
very defective. He points out that " N. caspius differs in many respects from the other species of
Niphargus, and, indeed, from N. ptiteanus, as in its shorter autenu;e, the differently formed hand of the
last pair of limbs, &c. ; so that our species may perhaps be regarded as tlie representative of a new
gemis between Niphargus and Gammams." He also remarks that N. caspius is very probably the
" extinct Gammarid " from which the other species of Niphargus have arisen.
Professor Aspek [1], in 1880, met in some of the Swiss Lakes a Gammarid which strikingly reminded
him of the common Gammarus pulvx. " The lake-form, however, was smaller and of a glassy
transparency. Specimens from depths of 140 and of GO metres possessed beautiful organs of vision,
with clearly observed crystal-cones. At Wadensweil, at a depth of 10 metres, along with seeino- forms
■were found blind specimens agreeing in the smallest detail with 'Niphargus Forelii' from the
Lake of Geneva. Specimens from Oberrieden Dr. Aspen regards as intermediate forms between
Gammarus pidex and the 'Forelii' variety oi Niphargus." (See Stebbing [108, p. .508].) Forel,
however, though admitting that these are modified so far as the colour and the eyes are concerned
states that they are not " des Niphargiis avec des yenx, des Niphargus incompletement modifies," that
the hands of the gnathopods and the third uropods are not modified, so that " ils out le type Gammarus
et non le type Niphargus" [40, ]). 180].
C. Parona [85], in 1880, discovered blind "Shrimps" in the cave of Monte Fencre, Val Scsia,
Piedmont. He considers his form to come very close to Niphargus puteatius, var. Forelii, Humbert.
He gives a general history of the species, strongly supporting de Rougemont's views. One female
specimen with short terminal uropoda specially attracted his attention as showing relation to Crangonyx.
Moniez has, however, shown that the specimen in question was mutilated, having lost the thiixl uropods,
as frequently happens with Niphargus [78, p. 4.3]. In tliis paper Parona also describes a new species of
Titanethes, viz. T. feneriensis.
Max Weber, in 1879, published a paper" Ueber Asellus caraticus, Schiodte " [116].
H. Blanc [11], in 1880, described a new species of the same genus, Asellus Forelii, from the deep
waters of the Lake of Geneva, pointing out the differences between it and A. cavaticus, Schiodte, to
which it appears to be closely related.
Both of these species appear to have been referred to by Max Weber [117] in a paper published in
1881, but I am nuable to say what information he gives on the subject.
Max Weber [118], (apparently in 1880), "examined histologically and chemically, and described, the
so-called liver of terrestrial, freshwater, subterraneous, littoral, and truly marine species of different
orders " of Crustacea. The blind and subterranean forms examined were Ti/phloniscus Steinii,
Asellus cavaticus, and Gammarus puteanus. (See Stebbing [108, p. 525].)
According to Ludwig [75], 1881, Gammarus puteanus has been found "in einen Brunneu zu
Greiz."
Packard and Cope [31], in 1881, investigated the faima of the Nickajack Cave in Tennessee. They
describe a new species of the genus Ccecidotea, viz. C. nickajackensis, Packard, in which the body is
longer, narrower, and slenderer than in C. stygia, Packard, from the Mammoth and Wyandotte Caves.
The authors add :— " This species forms, in the antennfe and slightly purplish colour and the jjroportions
of the leg-joints, perhaps a nearer approach to the genus Asellus than that of the Mammoth and Wyandotte
Caves ; on the other hand, C. stygia approaches Asellus more in its shorter, broader body, with its
shorter, broader abdomen. It seems quite evident that the two species must have descended from
diflFerent species of Asellus. Thus far we know of but one species of Asellus, A. communis of Say, from
176 Dll. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
the Middle and Northern States; whether there is an additional species in the Gulf States, from which
the present species may have been derived, remains to be seen.
" The genus Cecidotcea differs from Asellus in the larger and much longer head, the longer claw of
the first pair of feet, the much longer telson, and in the rami of the caudal appendages being of nearly
equal size, while in Asellus one is minute ; it is also eyeless. The Asellus Forelii of the Swiss Lakes
belongs to CecidoUea " [31, p. 880], The statement that one of the rami of the caudal appendages of
Asellus is minute is, of course, erroneous, and must have been based on some misunderstanding or
erroneous observation. This statement is repeated on p. 19 (evidently copied from above) in Packard's
larger paper, but is omitted in the fuller account on p. 29, where the differences between Ccecidotea and
Asellus are given in considerably different terms, and it is stated the Asellus Forelii, Blanc, does not
belong to Ccecidotea [83, p. 30] . Forbes united Cacidotea with Asellus, as a detailed comparison of
('. styyia "with undoubted Asellus, especially with the admirable plates of A. aquaticus in the 'Crustaces
d'eau douce de Norvege,' has failed to reveal any structural peculiarities which could positively serve as
the characters of a distinct genus" [41, p. 11]. In 1886, however, Packard still retained the genus
Ccecidotea on " taxonomic grounds " [83, p. 30] .
In the paper now under consideration, Packai'd and Cope write the name of the genus throughout as
Cecidotcea, though in establishing the genus Packard had originally spelt it Ccecidotea ; in his lai'ger
work again he spells it Ccecidotcea. Bovallius writes it Ccecidothea [15, p. 13]. Whether these varied
spellings are intentional or accidental it would no doubt be better to adhere to the original spelling, as
suggested by Stebbing [108, p. xx].
In the same paper [31, p. 880] a new species, Crangonyx antennatus, Packard, is described and
figured. This siDCcies is said to be very different from C vitreus. Cope, and from C. Packardli, Smith,
but to present various resemblances to C. f/racilis, Smith, from Lake Superior.
Chas. Chilton [22], in 1881, recorded the occurrence of subterranean Crustacea at Eyretou, North
Canterbury, New Zealand. He briefly described and figured three Amphipods, Calliojnus siibterraneus,
Gammarus fray His, and Crangonyx compactus, and one Isopod, Cruregens fontanus, all the species being
new. The genus Cruregens is also new, though apparently somewhat nearly allied to Paranthura. A
short notice of this paper by Alois Humbert, appeared in the Arch. Sci. Nat. viii. (Sept. 1882) p. 265.
A year later Chilton [23] gave a few additional facts on the occurrence and distribution of these species
and also described another Isopod, Phreatoicus typicus, nov. gen. et sp., obtained from the same well at
Eyreton. These Crustacea have since been obtained at various localities in the Canterbury Plains, and
are fully discussed in the paj)er below, in which an additional species, Phreatoicus assimilis, sp. nov., is
described from Winchester. Another species of the same genus, Phreatoicus australis, was
obtained in 1889 in freshwater streams near the top of Mt. Kosciusko in Australia, and has been fully
described by Chilton [26] . It of course possesses eyes, while the subterranean species ai-e blind.
O. P. Hay [56], in 1882, described a new species of Crangonyx, C. lucifugus, from a well in Abingdon,
Knox county, Illinois. It appears to resemble C. tenuis. Smith, but in the third uropod the two rami
arc both absent, and the peduncle itself is much reduced. He also describes Crangonyx bifurcus,
sp. nov., found in a rivulet at Macon, Mississippi. He says : "The three species, C. gracilis, C. bifurcus,
and C. lucifugus, present an interesting gradation in the form of the posterior caudal stylets." Attention
has been directed to this point further on (see p. 218).
Professor Ve.tdovsky [113], in his work on the fauna of the wells of Prague, mentions Niphargus
puteanus, but docs not closely describe it. The species seems to be widely spread at Prague. Vej-
dovsky shares de Rougement's opinion as to the identity of the various species of Well-Shrimps.
GusTAV Joseph \Q7'\, in 1882, gives very minutely his observations on the cave-fauna of Caruiola, and
describes a species, Niphargus orcimis, previously named by him. He mentions the following species as
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 177
found in Carniola : — Niphargus slyyius, Scliiodtc ; A^. puteanus, de la Valette St. George ; N. puteanus,
var. Forel/l, A. Humbert ; and N. orcinus, sp. nov.
Two species of Titanethes and one of Typhloniscus also appear to have been described by Joseph in
this paper. They are Titanethes fracticornis, Joseph, T. brevicornis, Joseph, from Carniola, and Typlilo-
niscus styq'ms, Joseph, from Italy. They are mentioned by Packard in his list of the cave-animals of
Europe [83, p. 86].
F. A. FoREL [40, p. 134] could not find Niphargus in the Savoy lakes, in Lake Bourget, and Lake
Annecy, but Niphargus puteanus, Koch, was found iu a well at Annecy.
O. E. Imhof [64] also was unable to find Niphargus iu these lakes, though in Lake Bourget Asellus
Forelii, Blanc, was found.
According to Eugene Dadav [34] Niphargus stygius is found in Transylvania, at Kis-Nyires
and Ugra.
Ed. van Beneden [10] also records the occurrence of Niphargus ptdeanus at Liege.
F. A. FoREL [40], in 1885, published his very exhaustive and comprehensive work on "La Faune
profonde des Lacs suisses," in which many references arc made to the blind Niphargus and Asellus. In
the fauna of the deep water he mentions Gammarus pulex, Dcg. (which appears to descend to considerable
depths, although the author says that the forms he has seen differ little from those of the littoral region),
Niphargus puteanus, var. Forelii, Humbert, and Asellus Forelii, Blanc. He is inclined to raise
Humbert's variety of Niphargus to the rank of a species, and mentions that it is nearer to the Niphargus
of wells than to the Gammarus pulex of the littoral region of the lake. He afterwards calls it
Niphargus Forelii. Asellus Forelii, Blanc, is abundant at various depths ; two specimens found at depths
of 200 metres and 300 metres had rudiments of eyes ; all the others, even the young from the pouch of
the female, showed no trace of eyes. The species is intermediate betweea Asellus aquaticus and
A. cavaticus, Schiiidte, but is nearer the latter. The author records Niphargus Forelii from the
following lakes : — Geneva, Neuchatel, Lucerne, Walenstadt, Zurich, Como ; and Asellus Forelii from
Bourget, Annecy, Geneva, Lucerne.
After an elaborate argument the author comes to the conclusion that the two species Niphargus
Forelii and Asellus Forelii are not derived from the fauna of the littoral region, but from the underground
waters of the surrounding country, which must therefore have more or less free communication with the
deep waters of the lakes.
G. BuDDE-LuND [18] in his 'Crustacea Isopoda Terrestria,' published in 1885, identifies Typhlo-
niscus Steinii, Schobl, and Ilea crussicornis, Koch, with Platyarthrus Hoffinannseggii, Brandt, a species
found in ants' nests throughout Europe ; he also gives another species, P. SchiJblii, from Algeria
[18, p. 201]. In the appendix [18, p. 306] he gives Typhloniscus stygius, Joseph, under the name
Plalyarthrus stygius, but does not say where it is found, or whether iu ants' nests or in caverus. Packard,
in his list of European cave-animals, gives it as from Italy [83, p. 86]. Under the genus Titanethes
Budde-Luud gives a short description of Titanethes albus {= Pherusa alha, Koch), and merely mentions
T. alpicola, Heller, T. graniger, Frivaldsky, T. feneriensis, Parona, T. fracticornis, Joseph, and T. brevi-
cornis, Joseph [18, p. 254].
G. Du Plessis-Gouret [87] deals with the same subject as that handled by Forel. He found
Niphargus Forelii opposite Ouchy in the Lake of Geneva, where Forel had not found it, and states that it
occurs also in the Lake of Lucerne. He says, without hesitation, that the lake Niphargus is descended
from the iinderground Niphargus.
G. Asper [2], in 1885, refers to his former work on this subject, but does not mention the forms
supposed to be intermediate between Gammarus pulex and Niphargus Forelii. He is of opinion that the
Niphargus gets into the lakes from wells.
178 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
R. Schneider [96], 1855, described from the mines at Clausthal a variety of Gammarus pulex, under
the name G. pulex var. .svbttrraneus, which diflcrs from the normal specimens of the species in its loss
of colour, the partial degeneration of the eyes, the possession of two joints only in the secondary
flagellum of the upper autenuse as in Nipiiarffus puteanus, &c. Schneider appears to consider it to some
extent intermediate between Gammarus pulex and Nrphargus puteanus. In connection with it Stebbing
says : " The special interest of the form lies in its occurrence in the waters of mines of which the age
can be more or less definitely ascertained" [108, p. 573]. It is discussed by Moniez, who has found a
somewhat similar form at Emmeriu [78, p. 39] .
Karl BovALLius [15], in 1886, in his 'Notes on the Family Asellidse,' mentions and gives brief
descriptions of Asellus Fortlii, Blanc, A. Sieboldii, de Rougcmont {—A. cavaticus, Schiijdte), and
Ceecidotcea stygia, Packard. He omits Ccscidotoea tdckajackensis, Packard, the account of which he had
evidently not seen. In the introduction [15, p. 3] he says : — " Caecidotaa seems to be closely con-
nected with AsL'lius Furelii and A. cavaticus, but without any knowledge of the form of its pleopoda it is
impossible to say whether it ought to be united with Asellus or not."
R. Schneider [97], in 1887, described a new vnrietj freibergensis, Schn., of Asellus aquaticus, found
in the water of the mines of Freiburg. It bears to A. aquaticus much the same relation as Gammarus
pulex var. subterraneus, Schn., does to the normal G. pulex. It is smaller, quite colourless, the eyes
persistent, but presenting the same example of degradation as in G. pulex var. subterraneus.
A. E. JuRiNAC [68] found in the caves of Croatia a species which he first named Eriopis croatica
and afterwards Nip/iargus cruaticus. According to Moniez, it is characterized by the anteaniB, which
are longer than the body, and contain 73 joints, the last six segments of the pleon are furnished with
a thick row of forked spines, the hand is almost square in the female and oval in the male [78, p. 49].
A. S. Packard's [83] paper on " The Cave Fauna of North America" was read in November 1886,
but I am unable to find out exactly when it was published. It contains a very full and comprehensive
account of the various caves, with the fauna of each, and a discussion on some of the points of general
impoi'tance presented thereby. The cave Isopoda given are Ceecidotcea sti/gia, Packard, and C. nicka-
jackensis, Packard. A fuller account than had previously been published is given of the genus Ciecidottea,
which is retained as distinct from Asellus " on taxonomic grounds " *, and, as it is pointed out, it presents
constant difl'erences from the blind Isopods of European caves and wells and from the depths of
the Swiss lakes, which, though exposed to similar conditions, have developed in a different direction.
The two species C. stygia and C nickajackensis are described in some detail and compared with the
surface species Asellus communis, and the author says : " It seems quite evident that the two species
have descended from difiereut species of Asellus. Whether there is an additional specie's in the
Southern States from which the present species [C. nickajackensis'] may have been derived remains to
be seen" [83, p. 33]. Two species, A. intermedius and A. brevicuuda, described by Forbes from
Southern Illinois, are mentioned, but it is stated that neitlier has been found in central or northern
IlUnois, "although the most varied situations were carefully searched" [83, p. 33]. The Amphipoda
given are Crangonyx vitreus, Smith {= Stygobromus vitreus. Cope), C. Packardii, Smith [-C. vitreus,
Packard), C. antennatus, Packard, C. mucronutus, Forbes, and C. lucij'ugus, Hay. Of the three last
mentioned, the original descriptions given by their authors are simply reproduced, the other two are
described and figured by Professor S. I. Smith. Of the first species, C. vitreus, he says: — "I know of
no species with which this is closely enough allied to make its affinities of any value on the question of
* Since this was written I have, through the kindness of Mr. W. T. Hay, received specimens of Cmcidoiaia stygia
from wells in Irvington, Indiana , and they differ so much in the proportions of tlie body and in other points from
Asellus communis, of which Mr. Hay has also sent me siiccimens, that I fuhy agree with Packard that Gmidotma
should rank as a distinct genus separate from Asellus.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 179
the origin of the cave-fauaa " [83, p. 35] . This species docs not possess even rudimentary eyes, but in
C. Packardii an imperfect eye is present. The latter species is very close to C. gracUis, Smith, and the
" differences are all such as very naturally lead to the supposition that this subterranean form has been
derived from the C. gracilis at no very remote period" [83, p. 36].
The brain of the eyeless CcecidotcEa is described and compared with that of AseUus, from which it appears
" that the eyeless C<ecidot(Ea differs from Aaellus, as regards its brain and organs of sight, in the complete
loss of the optic ganglion, the optic nerve, and the almost and sometimes quite total loss of the pigment-
cells and lenses" [83, p. 109]. Ccecidotiea does not appear to be always totally eyeless. In specimens
from a well at Normal, Illinois, the eye was represented by a black speck, varying in distinctness ;
no trace of eyes could, however, be detected in most of the Mammoth Cave specimens. The brains of
eyed and eyeless species of Crangonyx were also examined and compared, and the result thus stated :
" we see very slight diflferences between the brains of the eyed and the eyeless Crangonyx. The optic
ganglia have about the same proportions as do the other lobes and the arrangement of the ganglion-cells.
Perhaps striking differences should not be expected, as the eyes of the eyed species of Crangonyx
are small compared with those of Gammarus."
Numerous references to these cave Crustacea are made in the course of the author's remarks on the
general question of the peculiarities of the cave-fauna.
Thos. R. R. Stebbing [108] in his " Report on the ' Challenger ' Amphipoda," published in 1888
notices in his biographical introduction previous writings on the blind Amjjhipoda found in caves, wells
and the deep waters of lakes, with occasional remarks and criticisms of his own, most of which have
been already incorporated above.
R. MoNiEZ [78], in 1889, gave a full account of the fauna of the " Departement du Nord," and
particularly of the town of Lille, and besides giving the Crustacea found in this locality he mentions also
those recorded from other places by previous observers. He describes under the name Gammarus
fluviatUis, var. d'Emmerin, a single specimen from the reservoirs of Emmerin, which seems to differ from
the Gainmari found at the surface in much the same way as the G. judex, var. subterraneus, described by
Schneider does ; but as the last segments of the pleon bear groups of strong spines, it approaches more
nearly to G. fluviatUis. Moniez says that it forms in some maimer a couiiectiug-link between the
surface type and the variety described by Schneider. The number of joints in the flagella of the
antennae are rather numerous, the secondary appendage of the upper antenna containing five joints,
a point to which Moniez attaches some importance. The importance of this is, however, somewhat
lessened when we remember that the single specimen examined was of large size, viz. 22 millim. in
length, for the numbers of joints in the flagella of the antenuEe, and also in the secondary appendao-e
appear to increase with the size of the animal ; thus I have a large specimen of Gammarus frugihs,
14 millim. long, which has the secondary appendage composed of nine joints, whilst iu another only
7 millim. long there are only six joints, and 1 have seen specimens with even fewer joints than this. Of
course, in species where the normal number of joints is very small, the variation will not be so great, but
the same reasoning will apply to a modified degree.
Moniez does not accept the genus Niphargus, and under the name Gammarus puteanus, Koch, he
describes two forms ; the first, " G. puteanus a main triangulaire," corresponds to Xiphargus uquile.r,
Spence Bate, and to A', puteanus, var. onesiensis, Humbert, and this is the species which should he
considers, be looked upon as the true type of AlpJiargus puteanus. The other form, " Gammarus
puteanus k main ovale," differs iu the form of the hand of the guathopods, and partieularlv in the last
uropoda, which are short and bear only one branch consisting of a siugle joiut, thus resembliuo-
Crangonyx, though the telson is double and not simple as in that genus. This form Moniez constantly
found associated with Niphargus puteanus (a main triangulaire), but in much fewer numbers; and as
he cannot identify it with any of the previously described species aud is not inclined to see a new
species in it, he suggests that it may be a second form of the male of Niphargus puteanus.
SECOXD SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 2i
180 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEIUIANEAN
Wrzesniowski, however, makes this form a separate species under the provisional name Niphargus
Monk'zi, considering it a connecting-form between Niphargus and Crangonyx [ISi, p. G72].
Moniez did not finA. Asellus cavaticiis along with Niphargus jmteanus at Lille, although these two
species arc frequently found associated. He accounts for this by suggesting that owing to the habits of
the animal it is not so likely to he drawn up the pumps as the Amphipods are. He gives, however,
brief notices of the vai'ious Isopods found by other authors in wells, caves, &c., as he has already done a
few pages previously for the Amphipods found in similar situations.
August Wrzesxiowski [123], in 1888, published an elaborate paper in the Polish language under
the title " De tribns Crustaceis Amphipodis snbterraneis." In 1890 there appeared a translation,
apparently with some additions and alterations, in German [124]. This exceedingly careful and con-
scientious work will he quite indispensable to all future students of the subterranean Crustacea, and it
will therefore be sufficient to indicate here briefly the contents of the paper. Some of the more general
questions raised are considered elsewhere.
Tiie paper commences with a full historical sketch of the subject, which I have freely made use of in
drawing np the present account. Wrzesniowski, however, deals only with the Amphipoda. Then
follows a discussion on the genera Gammarus, Niphargus, Eriopis, Crangonyx, Goplana, and Boruta, the
genus Eriopis, Bruzelius, being retained under the altered form Eriopsis, and a new genus Boruta being
established apparently nearly related to Goplana, Wrzesniowski, but differing in some details of the
mouth-parts. The three new Amphipods described are Niphargus tatrensis, sp. uov., Niphargus puteanus,
var. Vejdovshji, var. nov., and Borvta tenebraruni, nov. gen. et sp. These species are described at
great length and compared with previously described species, the mouth-parts in particular receiving
special attention and being figured with great care. There is a discussion on the multiplicity of species
of Niphargiis, with an elaborate criticism of the views of de Rougemont, an account of the geographical
distribution of the subterranean Gammarids and of their probable origin, a bibliographical list of works
relating to the subject, and tables of measurements of the different species.
I regret exceedingly that my imperfect knowledge of German has prevented me from making as full
use of this paper as I should like to have done.
III. The History, Distribution, and Occurrence of the New Zealand
SUBTERRANEA.N CRUSTACEA.
The occurrence of blind Crustacea in tlie underground waters of Canterbury, New
Zealand, was first recorded by me in a pajier read before the Philosophical Institute
of Canterbury, on the 3rd November, 1881 [22]. This paper contained descriptions
illustrated with figures of four new species, — one Isopod, Criiregensfontanus, and three
Amphipods, Crangonyx com,pactns, Calliope subterranea, and Gammarus fragilis, — and
was subsequently published in the ' Transactions of the New Zealand Institute.'
In 1882, in a second paper read before the same Institute on the 5th October [23], I
made a few additions and corrections to the first jiaper, giving a few facts as to the
occurrence of the different s]3ecies, and also described another Isopod, Fhreatoicus
typicus, a new species and genus for which I have since made a separate family, the
Phreatoicidaj [26, p. 151].
The five species mentioned above had all been obtained from a well at East Eyreton,
about 13 or 14 miles from Christchurch, and most of them were subsequently obtained
from other wells in the immediate neighbourhood. Nothing further of importance
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 181
regarding these Crustacea was ascertained until towards the end of 1883, Avlieu Mr. D. L.
Inwood, of Winchester, near Temuka, South Canterbury, wrote to me stating that he
had taken similar blind Crustacea from a pump at Winchester. He afterwards very-
kindly forwarded me some specimens, which proved to belong to Gammarus fragills,
Calliope suhterranea, Cruregens fontanus, and to a species of Phreatoicus. A short note
recording the occurrence of these species at Winchester was published in the ' New
Zealand Journal of Science ' for March, 1881 [24], in which also the generic name
Calliope Avas altered to Calliopitis, as the former name was preoccupied, and it was
pointed out that the specimens referred to Phreatoicus ti/picus differed to some extent
from the Eyreton specimens, though whether they were entitled to rank as a new
variety or not was at the time left an open question ; in the i:)resent paper they have
been placed under the new^ species Phreatoicus assiniilis.
In 1889, Mr. G. M. Thomson [110, p. 262], recorded the existence of Calliopiiis snb-
terraneus in wells at Ashburton from specimens forwarded to him by Mr. W. W. Smith.
I have since received numerous specimens of this species from various wells in that
locality, both from Mr. Smith, and also from Mr. J. B. Mayue, Head Master of the
Ashburton Public School.
In 1891, Mr. Pt. M. Laiug, of the Christchurch Boys' High School, sent me several
specimens of Gammarus fragilis from wells at Leeston, about 27 miles from Christ-
church in a southerly direction. He has since sent me sjjecimens of Crangonijx com'
pactus and Cruregens fontanus also from the same well.
In the year 1892 Mr. E. Wilkinson, of the School of Agriculture, Lincoln, sent me
a large number of sj)ecimens of Calliopiiis suhterraneus from wells at that place, about
12 miles from Christchurch.
These are all the localities from which I have seen specimens of these Crustacea up to
the present time, though from various correspondents I learn that they have been seen
in other localities on the Canterbury Plains. Mr. Smith wrote me (Aug. 1892) that he
had heard of them from as far north as Leithfield, and also from Alford Eorest, only a few
miles from the base of the ranges, in a well 46 feet deep.
About the end of 1889 I received from the Trustees of the Australian Museum,
Sydney, a small collection of terrestrial and freshwater Crustacea, collected for the
Museum by Mr. R. Helms, while on an expedition to the Mt. Kosciusko plateau.
Among these I at once saw that there was one belonging to the genus Phreatoicus, which
had been established for the blind form from the wells at Eyreton. The occurrence of
a species of this genus inhabiting the surface-waters on the top of the Mt. Kosciusko
plateau, at a height of nearly 6000 feet above sea-level, was first jjublished in the small
' Handbook of Christchurch,' prepared for the Meeting of the Australian Association for
the Advancement of Science, at Christchurch, in January 1891 [63, \>. 19]. The species
was afterwards fully described in the ' Records of the Australian Museum ' under the
name Phreatoicus australis [26]. In the present paper I have compared it with the
two subterranean species P. ti/picus and P. assimilis.
Subterranean Crustacea have now been actually obtained from the following localities
in the Canterbuiy Plains : —
24*
182 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
1. East Eyretoi), about 15 miles north of Christcliurch, altitude about 120 feet above
sea-level *.
2. Lincoln, about 12 miles south of Christchurch, altitude about 28 feet above sea-
level.
3. Leeston, about 27 miles south of Christchurch, altitude about 60 feet above sea-
level.
4. Ashbnrton, about 50 miles south-west of Christchurch, altitude about 323 feet
above sea-level.
5. Winchester, about 85 miles south-west of Christchurch, altitude about 136 feet
above sea-level.
I have also heard of Crustacea being seen from wells at several other localities in
addition to those given above ; but leaving these out of consideration, the localities given,
from all of which I have actual specimens, are sufficient to show that these Crustacea
are widely distributed in Canterbury, so far as distance north and south is concerned ; the
distribution from east to west, so far as at present known, appears to be much more
restricted, and it is perhaps worthy of notice that all the places mentioned are within
short distances of the sea, none of them being more than 10 or 12 miles from it.
No doubt further research will demonstrate the occurrence of these Crustacea at many
other places ; at the same time it is to be remarked that they do not occur in the
artesian waters of Christchurch. Tlie area in which artesian wells can be sunk with
success is a narrow belt parallel to the sea, extending from Flaxton, north of the Waima-
kariri, to Lake Ellesmere, the inland boundary being the contour of about 50 feet above
the sea. The depth below the surface of the first water-bearing stratum varies from
about 55 feet at E,iccarton to 136 at New Brighton, on the sea-coast, and there is a
second water-bearing stratum at about double the depth of the first in each locality.
Crustacea appear to be absent from both of these water-bearing strata ; I have
frequently sought for them in vain in water from wells to the first stratum, and others
have been equally unsuccessful ; moreover, as the water of these wells is used throughout
the whole district for drinking-purposes without previous filtering, the animals would
certainly have been noticed had they been present. With regard to the wells reaching
to the second stratum, Mr. E.. M. Laiug tells me that he endeavoured to collect Crus-
tacea from a well of this kind at the Christchurch Boys' High School, Bath, by fixing a
muslin bag over the mouth of the pipe for some hours, but that no trace of any
Crustacea was obtained. Of course, this evidence, though very satisfactory so far as it
goes, is by no means conclusive, and it would be well to repeat the experiment in other
wells and at different times, in order to confirm or disprove the results of the single trial
already made.
In the above-mentioned ' Handbook of Cliristchurch ' [63, p. 33] it is pointed out that
although it is commonly thought that the main source of the water-supply of the artesian
wells is the leakage of the bed of the Waimakariri, the few careful observations that have
* This height has been obtained from the Survey Department tbrough the kindness of Mr. C. W. Adams, Chief
Surveyor, Dunediu. The other heights are taken from the iigures given in the time-tabk>s published by the Now
Zealand Railway Commissioners.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 183
been made do not confirm tliis hypotliesis at all, as floods in the river never aff'oct the
height of the water in the wells, while heavy rain makes them rise, and a continuance
of dry weather makes them fall. The absence of subterranean Crustacea appears to
confirm the opinion that the water of the artesian wells is not derived from the leakage
of the Waimakariri, for the water in which they are found at Eyreton is almost certainly
derived, partly at any rate, fi-om the Waimakariri, and if they exist there we might
reasonably expect to find them distributed all over the water affected by leakage from
that river.
All the subterranean Crustacea hitherto collected from the underground waters of the
Canterbury Plains have been obtained by means of the ordinary suction-pumps with
which the w^ells are usually fitted. In the same way similar Crustacea have been
obtained in England by Spenco Bate and others, in France by Moniez, in various parts of
Europe by numerous observers, and in North America by Hay, Forbes, and others. In
Europe and North America these Crustacea have also been procured from underground
streams in caves and from the deep u aters of lakes, but none have as yet been ol)tained
in this way in New Zealand. These situations have not yet been properly searched, and
it is qiiite possible that the blind Crustacea may yet be obtained by exploring the caves
in different parts of the colony, and by dredging in the deep alpine lakes of Otago.
The pumps referred to are mostly ordinary suction-pumps, and consequently do not go
down to a depth of much more than 30 feet. In some cases, however, owing to a con-
tinuance of dry weather for several years, the pipes have had to I^e driven deeper, and
fitted with a cylinder-pump, and Crustacea have still been occasionally taken from them ;
but it would be obviously rather more difficult to ])riug up Crustacea from greater
depths in this way than from less depths by an ordinary suction-pump, even although
they were equally numerous in the waters underground in the two cases. In some cases
there is an actual well, the soil having been excavated to a depth of 25 feet or so, and a
hole thus formed in which the water can accumulate; in the majority of cases, however,
the suction-pipe has been simply driven into the ground like that of an ordinary artesian
w^ell. The Crustacea are obtained quite as freely from wells of the one description as of
the other. I have myself noticed that the Crustacea are often brought up most abundantly
when pumping is first commenced, and that jerking tlie handle of the pump somewhat
violently is often more successful than pumping at the ordinary rate. Mr. J. B. Mayne
has noticed the same thing in connection with pumps at Ashburton, and Mr. E.
Wilkinson, of Lincoln, states that the Crustacea come up most abundantly after the
pump has been left for a time, especially in the early morning. Of course, these facts
can be easily accounted for if we consider the character of the small animals with which
we have to deal, for a sudden upward flow of the water would be more likely to carry them
with it than a more gradual flow, and they would be more likely to be found in the
neighbourhood of the pipe, or indeed in the pipe itself, when the waters had been for
some time undisturbed by pumping.
In order to collect them I have generally taken a small hand-bowl, pumped it full by a
few vigorous or jerking motions of the handle, then examined it to see if any Crustacea
184 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
have been brought up, catching any that there may be with a dippiug-tnbe, and pumping
the bowl full again after the lapse of a few minutes ; and where the Crustacea have been
fairly numerous I have found this intermittent method of pumping more successful than
continuous ])umping. In other wells where the Crustacea were fpund only sparingly,
Mr. Smith of Ashburton found it better to collect them by tying a muslin net over the
spout of the piimp ; and in order to prevent the animals being injured he floats the net in
a bucketful of water, the bucket being raised so that the level of the water in it is liigher
than the spout of the pump.
Mr. Smith reports from Ashburton that all the subterranean animals appear to have
been brought up by the pumps most abundantly some eighteen months or two years ago,
when, owing to the continued drought, the water in the wells was sinking ; but that
since the wells were sunk deeper, and up to the present time when the water is now
rising atrain in most wells, the animals have been much rarer. Thus in one of his letters
he says : — " I generally enquire wherever I go if any animals come up in the water, the
answer being that there were plenty twelve months ago hut none lately." In another he
says that one gentleman informs him " that they frequently saw minute ' pale shells with
white slugs in them ' before the pump went dry eighteen months ago; since sinking the
pump 15 feet more, they have not detected any animals in the water." In another letter,
dated 29th June, 1892, Mr. Smith says Mr. Dolman, a practical well-sinker of the district,
informed him " that he had not seen a single animal in well-water for some months.
There is, however, not much well-sinking going on, as the water is almost up to its usual
height."
My own experience tends to strengthen the conclusion that the animals are brought up
most abundantly while the level of the water is sinking, for I found them very abundant
at Eyreton from 1881 up to about 1886, during the whole of which time the water was
sinking, and the wells had to be deepened several times. I have had few opportunities
of collecting at Eyreton since, but I am told that very few animals have been seen during
the last two or three years. In 1891 Mr. R. M. Laing sent me quite a number of sub-
terranean Crustacea from one of the Avells at Leeston, and he states in a later letter that
the well has since become dry.
Erom the one well at Eyreton in which I first noticed the Crustacea I have collected
the following five species : — Qammarus fragUis, Crangomjx compactus, CalUopius suh-
terrancus, Cruregensfontunus^ and I'hreatoicus typicus. Of these CalUopius subterraneus,
the female, has always been much more abundant than any of the others ; for two or three
years from 1881 I seldom had to pump for more than 10 or 15 minutes without obtaining
some specimens of this species. After the well was deepened it was less abundant, and
did not preponderate over the others so much as before. The male of this species is very
rare ; I have seen only about half a dozen specimens altogether. "Whether this species is
really so much more abundant than the others in the underground waters is, perhaps, a
little doubtful, as from its smaller size it would naturally be drawn up the pijie more
easily than the larger forms. Of the other species, Gammarus fragilis and Crangonyx
compactus have been about equally abundant on the whole, but sometimes one form has
preponderated and sometimes the other ; Gruregens fontanus, though somewhat numerous,
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 185
has not been so commonly obtained as the others ; this may perhaps be accounted for by
its habit of creeping instead of swimming like the Amphipods. Moniez notes the same
thing with regard to Asellus cavaticus, Schiodte, which is frequently found along with
Gammarus puteaniis, bnt has not been met with from the district of Lille nor from
Prague, although the latter species is found at both places ; he accounts for this by
stating that, owing to the habits of the animal, it would rarely be brought up by the
pumps [78, p. 51].
The occurrence of Pht^eatoicns typicus has been somewhat peculiar. Although the
Crustacea coming up the pump were pretty carefully watched and collected from January
1881, no specimen of Fhreatoicus was observed until the beginning of September 1882,
while in a month from that date some six or seven other s^iecimens, all females, were
obtained. I have not taken it again since then ; but in the year 1892 a single specimen,
also a female, was taken at Ashburton by Mr. Smith. This species is represented at
Winchester by a closely allied sj)ecies, described in this paper as Fhreatoicus assimilis,
and of this I have three specimens only, two males and one female.
From Leeston the following species are so far known — Gammarus fragilis, Crangonyx
compactus, and Cruregens fontanus ; from Lincoln, Calliopius suhterraneus ; from Ash-
burton, CalliopiHS suhterraneus, Gammarus fragUis, Cruregens fontanus, and Fhreatoicus
typicus ; from Winchester, Calliopius suhterraneus, Gammarus fragilis, Cruregens fon-
tanus, and the representative species Fhreatoicus assimilis.
IV. Detailed Descriptions of the New Zealand Subterranean Crustacea.
ISOFODA.
Family PHREATOICID.E.
Genus Fhreatoicus, Chilton.
(Transactions New Zealand Institute, voL xv. p. 89.)
The folloAving are the characters that I originally assigned to this genus in 1882, when
I had only one species, Fhreatoicus typicus, before me. They apply, with the slight
limitations given below, to the three species of the genus now known, and may therefoi'e
still stand in the form in which they were originally put : —
" Body long, subcylindrical, laterally compressed. Upper antenna short, lower long,
with flagellum. Mandible with an appendage. First pair of legs subchelate, others
simple ; first ybr^r pairs articulated to body at the anterior ends of their segments and
directed forward ; last three articulated at posterior ends of their segments and directed
backward. Abdomen long, of sis distinct segments, last joined to telson. Sixth pair
of pleopoda biramous, styliform. Telson large, subconical."
On this description I may make the following remarks : —
1. The lateral compression of the body is not great and is seen chiefly in the pleon,
where the pleura of the segments are produced downward.
2. With regard to the legs, the first pair is subchelate in both sexes, but is larger in
the male than in the female, and the fourth pair in the male is slightly modified so as to
18G DE. C, CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
be almost subcbelate ; in tbe female tbe fouvtb pair is simjjle like tbe preceding. The
statement that tbe first four are attacbed to tbe body at tbe anterior ends of their seg-
ments and the last three at the posterior ends, although true enough of tbe typical sjiecies,
required some modification in the case of P. australis, for tbe last three pairs in this
species are attached to the centres of tlieir segments, tbe epimera occupying almost all
the inferior margins, and tliis is also true in a modified degree of tbe other species. The
point that I wished to bring out would be better expressed by saying that the legs arc
divided into an anterior series of four and a posterior series of tbree, and this would apply
equally well to the tbree species.
3. " Abdomen long " sbould perhaps read " pleon long " in order to be consistent with
tbe term " pleopoda " used afterwards. The term " uropoda " is again a very convenient
one to use in place of " sixth pair of pleopoda."
4. Tbe j)eculiarities of tbe pleopoda, as shown in tbe descriptions given below, are, no
doubt, quite worthy of being mentioned among the characters of tbe genus, but they
cannot be observed without dissection, and so long as tbe genus can be sufficiently dis-
tinguished by other points more easily observed, there is no necessity to introduce them.
Perhaps some of them, sucb as tbe possession of an " epipodite," will prove to be
cbaracters of tbe family and not merely of the genus.
Phreatoictjs assimilis, sp. nov. (Plates XVI. & XVII.)
Phreatoicus typicus, Chilton, New Zealand Journal of Science, ii. p. 89 (March 1884).
Phrealoicus typicus (pars), Thomson and Chilton, Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xviii.
p. 151.
Specific di(tg)wsis. Body somewhat stout. Pleura of tbe second, third, fourth, and
fifth segments of tbe pleon very largely developed, much deeper than then- respective
seo'meuts ; tbe inferior margins somewhat sparsely fringed with small spinules. The
projection at the extremity of the telsou not much produced, broader than long ; upper
angle of its extremity sharp and tipped with a few setge ; lower angle rounded. Lower
antennee about half as long as the body ; peduncle with the fifth joint only about half as
long again as the fourth ; flagellum much longer than tbe peduncle. Legs stoutish,
with tbe joints somewhat expanded, all the pairs well supplied Avith setae. Lower lip
wdth each half ovate, with the extremity well rounded. Inner lobe of the first maxilla
rather narrow and with only four plumose setae at its extremity.
Colour. Translucent.
Length. About half an incb (10 to 12 mm.).
Habitat. "V\'incbester, South Canterbury, in wells {D. L. Inwood).
Detailed Description.
Tbe following detailed description is mainly taken from a male specimen that was
dissected for tbe purpose. A few points regarding tbe surface of tbe body &c. have been
taken from a female specimen that was mounted dry on a slide.
Body (PI. XVI. fig. 1). Tlie female specimen has tbe body 10'5 mm. long, and tbe perceon
about 1'5 mm. deep. The body is of uniform breadth throughout its whole leugtb. In
CKUSTACEA OP NEW ZEALAND. 187
the perseon the depth is about equal to the breadth, the ventral surface being more or
less flat, so that here the body is semi-cylindrical ; in the pleon the segments (except the
first and sixth) have the pleura much produced below into smooth, flat, thin plates
protecting the pleopoda ou either side.
The surface of the body is smooth throughout, with a few setae scattered here and there
either singly or in small tufts, cliielly on the dorsal surface.
Eead (I'l. XVI. fig. 1). The dorsal surface is convex, curving downward in front,
making the outline of the head in lateral view roughly subtriangular. The anterior
margin, as seen from above, is concave behind the bases of the antennse. A depressed
line on the side of the head toward the posterior end runs down more or less parallel
with the posterior margin and runs out into the inferior margin ; it does not extend over
the dorsal surface of the head. Behiud the base of the lower autennte there is a slio-ht
cleft in the front margin, and behind this a slight depression on the surface which
extends backward a little distance and then turns downward. The inferior maro-iu of
the head is nearly straight. In the dried specimen there is no trace of the eyes, the
exoskeletou being apparently continuous over the place where the eyes would be situated
if they were present.
Ferceon (PI. XYI. fig. 1). The first segment is only half as long as the second ; it widens
a little iuieriorly and has the antero-iuferior angle somewhat produced, so that the front
margin slopes forward and brings the lower part of the segment very close up to the
head. The inferior margin is slightly convex and not hollowed for the reception of
the epimeron, which appears to be ankylosed to the segment, the suture being indistinct.
The second, third, and fourth segments are all similar and subequal, and of the same
length at the inferior margin as on the dorsal surface. The inferior margin is nearly
straight, but slightly concave anteriorly for the reception of the shallow epimeron ; the
anterior angle produced into a rounded knob, tipped with a few setae ; the posterior auo-le
rounded, with a few setse in the third and fourth segments. The fifth segment is some-
what shorter than the fourth ; the anterior angle of the inferior margin is rounded and
bears a few setae, Avhile the rest of the inferior margin is deeply emargiuate to receive the
triangular epimeron ; the sixth and seventh segments are similar to the fifth, but each is
shorter than the preceding one.
Fleoii (PI. XVI. fig. 1). The first segment is shorter than the last segment of the
perseon, but of nearly the same depth ; the inferior margin is rounded off at both angles
and bears about G to 8 minute spinules scattered along the margin. The second, third,
and fourth segments are subequal and somewhat longer than the first ; they have their
pleura produced inferiorly into large, thin plates, considerably deeper than the respective
segments. The pleuron of each segment has the anterior angle of the inferior margin
rounded ; posteriorly the pleuron is slightly produced so as to overlap that of the
succeeding segment ; that of the second segment is also produced anteriorly as far as the
anterior margin of the first segment, fitting in below its small pleuron; the posterior
angles are slightly produced and usually bear a few minute spinules. The fifth segment
is nearly as long as the three preceding; its pleuron has the posterior angle well
rounded, tiie posterior margin and part of the inferior margin being sparingly supplied
with spinules.
SECONB SElllES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 25
188 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERE AN EAJM
The sixth segment is completely coalesced with the telson, forming a somewhat conical
tail-piece, which ends posteriorly in a small projection broader than long, its upper angle
at the extremity sharp and tipped with a few small setae, the lower angle being rounded
and free from setse. Below this projection the inferior margin on each side is slightly
irregular, more or less dentate, and is fringed with spinules. The posterior margin in
front of the articulation of the uropoda is convex and bears four stout spiniform setae.
The tipper antennce (PI. XVI. fig. 2) consist of about 9 or 10 joints, of which the
three at the base may be considered tlie peduncle, although there is little or nothing to
distinguish them from the succeeding joints. The first and second joints are subequal
and somewhat larger than the third ; all three bear several small setae at the distal end ;
the first three joints of the flagellum are subequal and a little shorter than the last
joint of the peduncle ; the remaining joints are longer and thicker, being usually
considerably swollen, especially towards the distal end, the swelling being chiefly due to
a thickening of the chitinous integument ; the penultimate joint is usually the thickest,
the terminal one being small. The joints of the flagellum bear a few minute spinules
distally, and the last four joints have in addition one or two small "olfactory cylinders."
The number of the joints in the antennae and their relative sizes are subject to
considerable variation. The one drawn (PI. XVI. fig. 2) has the terminal joints less
swollen than usual ; the penultimate joint is slightly constricted at the middle and
bears two groups of "olfactory cylinders;" hence it probably represents two joints, and
in that case this antenna would contain altogether ten joints. The other antenna of the
same specimen was more normal; it also contained ten joints, and those toward the end
were more swollen, the antepenultimate being the largest.
he loicer antennce (PI. XVI. fig. 3) are about half as long as the body. The peduncle
is somewhat longer than the upper antennae. The first two joints ai^e short and subequal ;
the third is about as long as the first and second together, curving slightly upward, the
upper margin being concave and the lower convex, while there are two small groups of
setae on the lower margin and one on the upper margin at the extremity ; the fourth
joint is half as long again as the third, having a few spinules along each margin and
a tuft at the extremity in the middle; the fifth joint is consideral)ly longer than the
fourth, bearing three or four small tufts of setae along each margin and tufts of longer
setae at the extremity. The flagellum contains about 30 joints, each bearing at the
extremity a circlet of setae about half as long as the joint from which they spring; some
are placed singly, others in small tufts. At the base of the flagellum each joint is as
broad as long, but they gradually become longer and narrower until at the end each joint
is about four times as long as broad.
The upper Up (PI. XVI. fig. 4) is rather large and strong, being thick and chitinous.
It is broader than long, rounded distally, the middle of the distal margin very slightly
produced ; the extremity is covered very densely with fine short setae, directed chiefly
towards the centre and forming a thick fur.
The mandibles (PI. XVI. figs. 5, 6) are very similar in general structure to those of
Phreatoicus australis [26, pp. 156, 157, pi. xxiii. figs. 5 and 5 a]. In a lateral view of
the head the large basal joint is seen extending along the anterior portion of the lower
CEUSTACEA OF ISHEW ZEALAND. 189
margin of the head, which, however, is nearly straight and is not hollowed out for the
reception of the mandible as described by Sars [91, j). 94] in Asellus aquaiicus. Below
the base of the lower antennae arises the 3-jointed palp, which extends forward beneath
the antennae, its third joint being usually bent sharply inward, nearly at right angles to
the second. Prom this point the basal joint extends downward and curves fornrard. and
inward to form the cutting-edge. The molar tubercle arises from the concave inner
surface of the basal joint and extends inwards to meet its fellow on the other side, at a
point above and somewhat posterior to the cutting-edge ; it is large and strong, but not
so stout as in Phreatoicus australis. A view of the outer convex surface of the mandible
with the palp attached is shown in fig. 5 ; in this the molar tubercle is of course com-
pletely hidden from view ; it will be seen that there are a few setae at the base of the palp
on the side toward the base of the mandible, a small row of fine hairs on the other
side of the palj), and another on the inferior edge of the basal portion of the mandible.
The figure that I origiiially gave of the mandible of Phreatoicus typicus [23, pi. iv. fig. 5]
is almost the reverse of the one now referred to, and shows it from the inner side as it
rests on its rounded outer surface — its most natural position when dissected out ; the molar
tubercle then projects directly upward and only its extremity is shown.
As usual, the two mandibles difi'er slightly in the cutting-edge. In the right mandible
there is only the one cutting-edge formed by the extremity of the basal joint itseK ; this
appears usually to consist of three teeth only. In the left mandible (fig. 6) the
corresponding part is formed of four teeth, two long ones of equal length and the other
two shorter; in addition to this there is the secondary cutting-edge, comj)Osed of three
teeth on a process which arises inside and extends parallel to the outer cutting-edge
almost as far as its extremity. At the base of this and between it and the molar tubercle
is another projection nearly as broad as long, having its extremity rounded and bordered
by a double I'ow of stout setae ; the outermost of these are short, stout, and denticulated ;
the inner ones, nearer the molar tubercle, become gradually longer, more slender, and
plumose instead of denticulate. This process is the same in both mandibles.
The mandibular palp (see fig. 5) is the same in both mandibles ; the first joint is
short, only half as long as the second, and bears several long setae at its extremity ; the
second joint is oblong and bears three tufts of setae ou its lower margin toward the eud
and another tuft at the extremity ; the third joint is fully as long as the second, and is
usually bent upward and inward at right angles to it. Its anterior margin is slightly
concave toward the distal end, and bears two regular rows of slightly curved, coarsely
plumose setae ; those at the basal end of the row are very short, but the others gradually
lengthen distally till the terminal one is about as long as the portion of the joint bearing
the row.
The lower Up (fig. 7) consists of two lobes narrowed at the base, ovate in shape, with
the extremity rounded ; the inner margins are fringed mth long setae projecting radially
inward, those toward the extremity being the longest. On the outer margins about
the middle is a thick tuft of finer setae, and nearer the base another group of shorter
setae forming a sort of fur, Avhich extends ou to the surface of the lip. The two lobes are
quite divided aluiost to the base, where they appear to be connected with a soft membrane ;
25*
190 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
each has fine setae arranged on the surface near the base of the inner margin. The
outer margins appear thick and chitinous, but the rest of the lip is thin and delicate.
The first maxilla (fig. 8) consists of two lobes, which appear somewhat indistinctly
articulated to a basal portion, whicli may perhaps represent the combined basos and
ischium, the two lobes representing the internal and external lacinice arising from the
basos and ischium respectively. See Boas [13, pp. 495-8] and Parker [84, p. 22].
There is a tuft of fine setae on the outer margin of the base near the articulation of
the outer lobe, and another on the inner margin at the base of the inner lobe. The outer
lobe is long, its articulation with the base very oblique ; the distal portion curves slightly
inward, having the mai'gins parallel and both fringed with numerous fine setae ; the end,
which is oblique, is crowned with numerous short spiniform setse, the innermost of which
are more or less denticulate. The inner lobe is narrow at the base, but expands some-
what toward the distal end ; it has both margins and a portion of the outer (posterior)
surface covered with rather long but very fine setae. At the rounded extremity there are
four long setae, rather distant from each other ; they appear segmented, and are densely
plumose and somewhat denticulated toward the extremity ; at the base of each of the
two innermost is a single simple seta.
Bands of muscles can be seen attached to the bases of each of the lobes, but no muscles
extend into the lobes themselves, a fact which, without further evidence, would be almost
sufficient to show that the two lobes cannot represent the exopodite and endopodite of the
typical crustacean limb, as some authors have held.
The second maxilla (fig. 9) is of the usual shape, and consists of a broad, somewhat
rectangular basal portion, having two lobes articulated to its distal end, and being pro-
duced distally on the inner side so as to form a third lobe, which, however, is not divided
off from the basal portion. The outer margin of the base is straight, and is fringed
almost throughout with numerous fine, stiff setae ; the inner margin is slightly concave,
and is fringed with two rows of setae. The outer (posterior) row consists of about 15 setae,
not very closely packed, and denticulate at the ends ; at the distal end of this row succeeds
a number of fi.ner stiff' setae, forming at first a kind of continuation of the row and then
spreading out so as to cover the surface of the end of the inner lobe. The inner (anterior)
row consists of a much greater number of setae, apparently simple, with thickened
bases, the setae being so closely packed . that the bases almost adjoin ; towards the
proximal end of the row the thickened base of each seta is rather long, but in the others
it o-radually decreases till in the setae at the distal end of the row the base is quite short.
This row of setae is situated along the edge of the inner margin ; but at the distal end,
when it has reached about halfway along the inner lobe, it leaves the margin and is
continued for a short distance along the inner (anterior) surface of the lobe ; beyond the
end of the row is a single simple seta.
The inner lobe curves slightly inward ; its extremity is truncate, with the corners
rounded off, and it bears about 12 long setae, the outermost being the longest and
simply plumose, while the inner ones are shorter and in addition to the plumes bear
denticulations toward the ends, the denticulations increasing in distinctness and strength
as they proceed inward.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 191
The two articulated lobes are similar and subequal ; they are oblong, with the extremi-
ties rounded. Each bears at the end and alon2^ the distal portion of the inner margin a
large number of long pectinated setae, which curve somewhat inward. On the outermost
setae, which are the longest, the pectinations which project at right angles to the setae
are very fine, but they become much coarser on the inner shorter setae.
Various portions of the second maxilla bear very fine but rather long straight setae, like
those on the first maxilla. Those on the outer surface have already been described. On
the inner surface there is a large tuft on the l)asal portion toward the inner edge, and
two other tufts near the base of the outer articulated lol)e ; the inner margin of the inner
articulated lobe is also fringed with fine setse.
The maxillipedes ffigs. 10, 11) ai-e large and appear more perfectly developed than
in most other genera of the Isopoda. In general structure they closely resemble those
of Phreatoicus av.stralis as well as those of P. typicus, but my original description and
figure [23, pi. iv. fig. 9] of the maxillipedes of the latter species are imperfect and based
on a partial misconception of the appendage.
The first joint, the coxa, is irregular in outline, appearing more or less circular when
seen from the anterior side ; from it arises the large basos and, on the outer side, the
e])rpodite. This is a large flat plate reaching beyond the end of the ischium, irregularly
elliptical in outline, slightly emarginate at the distal end, the mai'gins being entire;
along the inner edge, when' it impinges against the basos, the margin itself and the
neighbouring portion of the outer surface are covered with very fine setae. Tlie basos,
when seen from the outside, is quadrangular, about twice as long as broad, the outer
margin fringed with fine delicate setse like those on the neighbouring portion of the
epipodite ; besides the portion of the basos thus seen, another portion almost at right
angles to it projects inward, and this is produced distally beyond the basos proper into
a large concave plate, reaching beyond the inner extremity of the meros and having its
convex surface tiu-ned inward toward the median line. The inner margin of this plate
up to the end of the basos proper is thickly fringed with fine delicate setae; beyond this
the whole margin of the distal portion of the concave plate is thickly fringed with large
plumose setae, those at the extremity being shorter than the others and more or less
pectinate instead of plumose. Many other setae, similar to these at the extremity, are
scattered over the distal end of the convex side of the plate. These setae probably form
straining apparatus of some kind.
Near the base of the plate, a little beyond the extremity of the basos proper, are two
long " coupling-spines," slightly hooked at the extremity, very similar to those of Asellus
aquaticus, as described and figured by Sars [91, pi. ix. fig. 5"].
The iscJiium is short, transverse, with one or two setse at the extremity on the
inner edge. The meros is subtriangu.lar, produced at the outer side about halfway
along the carpus, and is somewhat hollowed distally to receive the carpus ; there are a
few rather stout setae on the outer margin at the extremity, and the inner margin is
convex and fringed with rather long setae. The carpus is somewhat sunk in the meros,
slightly narrowed at the base, the outer margin slightly sinuous and with a small tuft
of setae at the extremity, the inner margin convex and densely fringed with long setse.
192 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
The projjodos is oblong; outer margin slightly convex, with one or two setae at the
extremity only ; inner margin slightly convex and densely fringed with setae, except at
the base. The dactylos is similar to the propodos, but much shorter and narrower ; it
bears setfB arranged as in the propodos, two or three of those at the extremity being
very long and robust.
First appendage of pero'on (PI. XVII. figs. 1, 2, 3). In the male these form large
well-developed subchelate gnathopoda, very similar in general appearance to those found
in many Amphipoda. In the female they are similar, but much smaller. Unfortunately,
the only female specimen that I have of this species has been mounted dry on a slide, and
I am, therefore, unable to give a full detailed descrii^tion of its gnathopods, but so far as
I can see they are very like those of Phreatoicits typicus as described later on [see p. 199,
PI. XVIII. figs. 7, 8], except that they are stouter and rather better supplied with setaj.
The following description therefore apj)lies to the male only.
The coxa (epimeron) is small, attached to the anterior portion of its segment, and is
more or less ankylosed to it ; it is free from setse, and is emarginate below to receive
the basos. The hasos is longer than the ischium; it is constricted at the base and has
three small tufts of setae on the posterior margin. The ischium is similar to and nearly as
lono- as the basos ; it has two or three tufts of setse on the posterior margin and two stout
setse at the middle of the anterior margin, where it is slightly convex. The meros has a
smaU tuft of setce at the extremity of the posterior margin, which is straight : this joint
is expanded distally, produced anteriorly and inward, and is hollowed out at the end
to receive the rounded end of the large propodos ; the inner margin of the cup-shaped
socket thus formed is very densely fringed with long straight setas projecting radially
inward (PL XVII. fig. 3) . The carpus is small, sub-oblong, the posterior margin with a tuft
of setEe towards the extremity and one or two separate setse placed more proximally, the
anterior margin completely covered by the propodos and meros. The propodos is very
laro-e, forming much the largest portion of the whole limb ; it is produced backwards
beyond the carpus into a rounded lobe which rests back on to the meros ; the whole joint
is oval in outline, the anterior margin very convex and without setse, with the exception
of a small tvift at the extremity ; the posterior margin slightly sinuous, fringed with short
setse ; the palm oblique and well defined, armed with a rounded lobe near the base of the
dactylos, followed by four very short triangular spines placed on slightly rounded lobes :
these spines decrease in size as they recede from the dactylos ; between the base of the
dactylos and the rounded lobe is a row of 7 to 8 setae, and from the lobe toward the end
of the palm is a row of simple setse, each with a distinctly enlarged base, and near this
row a few scattered setae on the surface of the propodos. The dactylos is strong, as long
as the palm, both margins fringed with a few minute spinules, the extremity forming a
distinct nail, with a small secondary nail on the inner margin at its base.
The second appendage oftheperceon (PI. XVII. fig. 4).— The coxa is similar to that of the
first appendage, but is slightly larger and is distinctly marked off from its segment.
The hasos is narrow at the base, but widens out at the middle, where the breadth is nearly
half the length, and it narrows slightly again toward the distal end ; the anterior margin
is fringed throughout its whole length with short, stout setse ; the posterior margin bears
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 193
one or two similar setae about the middle and a tuft of fluer setsB at the extremity. The
ischium is about three-fourths as long as the basos: it is narrow at the base but con-
siderably expanded distally ; the anterior margin is convex, slightly irregular, and bears
five spiniform setae, followed by a series of three or four finei- setae towards the extremity ;
the posterior margin is nearly straight, bearing five or six small tufts of one or two setae
each, and a larger tuft of longer seti:e at the extremity. The meros is about three-fourths
as long as the ischium, subtriangular, and produced at the antero-distal angle; the
anterior margin is strongly convex, bearing live spiniform setse, with a row of six or seven
along the distal end ; the posterior margin straight and fringed with numerous setae.
The carpus is somewhat smaller than the meros, similar in shape, but not produced at the
antero-distal angle ; the anterior margin convex, with setae toward the extremity only ;
posterior margin straight and fringed externally with spiniform setag. The propodos is
oblong, slightly longer than the carpus and a little narrowed distally; the anterior
margin is slightly convex and bears a few fine setse, chiefly toward the extremity ; the
posterior margin straight, bordered with five spiniform setse and a number of finer hairs :
at its extremity the propodos is produced alongside the base of the dactylos into a small
triangular projection (PL XVII. fig. 5) similar to tliat described by Sars [91, p. 100] in
Asellus aqiiaticKS. The dactylos is slender : the end forms a distinct nail with three or
four setae on the surface of the dactylos at its base : on the inner margin is a small
secondary nail at the base of the large one, with a seta arising in the angle between the
two.
The third appendage of the perceon is almost exactly the same as the second in all
respects, and tig. 4, drawn from the second, will equally well delineate the third.
The fourth appendage of the perceon (figs. 6, 7) is like the second and third in the
female, but it is slightly modified in the male to form a grasping-organ, instead of
being merely adapted for walking. The whole leg is somewhat shorter than the pre-
ceding ; the basos is the same ; the ischium also the same, except that it is shorter than in
the preceding legs ; the meros and carpus are much shorter, but otherwise similar, and
with the same general arrangement of setoe ; the propodos has the anterior margin very
convex, the posterior margin being developed into a slightly concave palm, distinctly
defined by a small group of three or four very stout spiniform setse, and occu2)ying
nearly three-foiu-ths of the whole margin ; the dacttjlos is rather short, and is considerably
curved.
The first four pairs of appendages to the perseon form an anterior series, differing very
considerably in structure from the last three pairs, forming the posterior series. In the
anterior series the dactylos is directed backward, while in the posterior pair it is directed
forward, as in the majority of the Amphipoda.
The fiftli, sixth, and seventh appendages of tlie peneoa (figs. 8, 9) are similar to each
other, but ditter in size, the sixth being larger than the fifth, and the seventh as
much larger than the sixth. I shall describe the sixth, pair only, and it must be under-
stood that this pair represents the mean between the fifth and seventh pairs, not in size
only, but also in the number and size of the setae found on the various joints.
The coxa is subtriangular in outline, and fits into a triangular emai'gination in the
194 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
segment, the lower margin of the coxa being straight or somewhat concave. In the fifth
segment the coxa occupies only the posterior half of the lower margin of the segment,
but in the sixth and seventh segments, which are considerably shorter, the coxa
occupies nearly the wiiole of the lower margin. The basos is oblong, about twice as
long as broad, its slightly convex anterior margin supplied with eight or nine short but
rather stout setae and a tuft of finer hairs at the extremity ; the posterior mai'gin
produced somewhat backAvard, as in the Amphipoda, irregularly serrate, and armed,
except towards the extremity, with about a dozen strong spiniform setae. The ischium is
as long as the basos, its anterior margin straight, obscurely serrate, and with five small
tufts of setae marking the serrations, and a transverse row along the distal margin ; the
posterior margin is convex, with five serrations, each of the first four bearing a strong
sjnniform seta, and the last a row of about four or five. The meros is rather more than
half as long as the ischium, the anterior margin straight and bearing three groups of
stout setae, the distal one being the largest ; the posterior margin bears two or three
spiniform setae, and a row of three or four along the distal margin at the posterior angle,
A\ hich is somewhat produced. The carpus is as long as the propodos, but broader : both
are oblong, slightly expanding distally, with groups of stout setae along both margins,
but more especially along the anterior margin, and a row along the end at each angle.
The dactylos is about as long as the setae at the end of the propodos, similar to the
dactylos of the second pair of legs, but more slender.
The pleopoda of Flireatoicus are large and well developed, and present such pecu-
liarities that they are well worthy of careful examination and description. The five
pairs all appear to be branchial in function, and though the first pair difi'er in shape
from the others, they appear to be the same in minute structure, probably fulfil
the same function, and do not act as an " imperfect operculum " to the otliers as I
originally stated [23, p. 91]. All the pleopoda hang vertically from the ventral surface
of their segments, and are protected laterally by the greatly developed pleura.
The first pair of pleopoda (PI. XVII. fig. 10) have the basal joint ov protopodite sub-
rectangular, with one seta at the extremity on the outer margin, and several similarly
placed on the inner margin. Prom the protopodite arise two rami, both long and
narrow ; the inner one, endopodite, is narrow-elliptical, about five times as long as broad,
with the margins quite entire and without setae, and the extremity subacute ; the outer
ramus, exop)odite,\s, oblong, longer than the endopodite, the inner margin nearly straight,
outer margin irregularly curved at each end ; the whole of the inner margin and the
extremity fringed with rather long setae ; on the outer margin the setae are long at the
end, but they become smaller tow'ard the base and disappear altogether before the base
is quite reached. All the setae on the inner margin are simple, those at the extremity
and on the neighbouring portion of the outer margin are plumose ; the others on the
outer margin become gradually less plumose as they approach the base, until at about
the middle of the joint they are quite simple.
'^rhe second pair of pleopoda (fig. 11) differ in the two sexes, being specially modified
in the male so as to serve as an accessory copulatory organ. It will be convenient to
describe that of the male first. The p)7'otopodite has the same general shape as in the
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 195
first pair, and bears a few setJB at its extremity on the inner margin ; the endopodite is
similar to that of the first pair, but bears on the inner side a long, narrow, curved
appendage, the " penial filament," which docs not reacli so far as the end of the endo-
podite ; it appears to be semi-cylindrical, being concave on the outer side, and bears four
or five short setae at its extremity. Tlie portion of the endopodite between its base and
the base of the "penial filament " is about one-fourth the length of the whole endopodite;
it is slightly enlarged, and bears toward the inner margin a powerful muscle attached
to the base of the " penial filament."
It will be seen from fig. 11 that the "penial filament" of JPhrcatokus assimilis, as
drawn, is much shorter than in P. cutstralls [26, pi. xxvi. fig. 2] ; it is, however, quite
probable that, like other secondary sexual characters, it may vary vmy greatly in deve-
lopment at different seasons. The eocopodite is large, and consists of two joints ; on the
outer side it is produced backward at the base into a rounded lobe which lies alongside
of the protopodite ; the outer margin of the first joint is fringed rather sparingly with
short simple setse, its inner margin is straight and more thickly fringed with similar
setse; the second joint is triangular, articulated to the first joint by a very narrow base;
the inner margin is straight, and, like that of the first joint, is fringed with simple setae,
but these are much longer than on the first joint ; the extremity, which is oblique, is
bordered on the outer margin by about 10 long delicately plumose setae.
The endopodite does not hang by the side of the exopodite, but overla})s it, and the
exopodite is curved so as to receive it ; a raised ridge runs from the outer extremity of
the protopodite toward the outer margin of tlie first joint of the exopodite, meeting it
at about the middle, and thus bordering the depression within which tlie exopodite lies.
The endopodite usually overlaps the exopodite to a greater extent than is shown in
fig. 11, where it was purposely somewhat separated from the exopodite to allow the
form of the latter to be more clearly seen. The more natural position of the two is
shown in fig. 12, which represents the third pair of pleopoda.
I have had no opportunity of examining the pleopoda of a female specimen of
Phreatoicns assimilis, but from the analogy of P. cmstralls and P. ii/idcus I have no
doubt that the second pleopoda would resemble that of the male, as above described,
except that there would be no penial filament.
The third pah- of ^^leojxjda (fig. 12) are similar to the &econA, hut i\\Q endopodite \&
rather smaller in proportion to the exopodite, and does not reach beyond the base of the
second joint of the latter. From the outer margin of the protopodit(! arises a sub-
triangular lobe projecting nearly at right angles to the protopodite, and apparently
representing the epipodite ; its margins bear long simple seta?, \\ idely separated from
each other, and its integument, though apparently thicker than that of the rest of the
pleopod, is more or less membranaceous, so that this epipodite is perhaps also branchial
in function.
The significance of the occurrence of an epipodite in the pleopoda of Fhreatoicus is
considered later on (see p. 214<).
The fourth and fifth pairs of pleopoda contain precisely the same parts as the third
pair, but each is much shorter and broader than the preceding.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 26
196 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
Tlie uropoda (fig. 13) arc long, the peduncle as long as the inner ramus, and reaching
considerahly beyond the end of the telson. Its lower margin is straight and bears three
tufts of setae on the proximal portion and another tuft at the extremity ; the upper
surface is flat or slightly concave, the outer margin with a few small setae scattered
along the whole length ; the inner margin with few setae, except towards the end,
where it is somewhat raised and bears two stout spiniform setae on the projection. The
outer ramus is considerably shorter than the inner, but of the same shape ; each is
lanceolate, a little constricted at the base, and bears numerous tufts of one or two stout
setae and many fine hairs ; the extremities narrow somewhat abruptly and are free
from setae.
Male reproductive organs. I came across the male reproductive organs in the
specimen from which I was dissecting out the appendages. They seem to have the
same general shape as in Asellus aquaUcus [91, pi. x. fig. 7], but there appears to be a
great number of the oval cnl-de-sacs, apparently five or six. The vas deferens was quite
crammed with spermatozoa, which resemble those of Asellus.
I have been unable to find an external male organ in either of the two specimens I
possess.
Phreatoicus ttpicus, Chilton. (PL XVIII. figs. 1-12.)
Phreatoicus typicus, Chilton, New Zealand Journal of Science, vol. i. p. 279 (Nov. 1882) ; id. Trans-
actions New Zealand Institute, vol. xv. p. 89, plate iv. ; Thomson & Chilton, Transactions New
Zealand Institute, vol. xviii. p. 151; T. R. R. Stebbing, Report on the 'Challenger' Amphipoda,
pp.513, 587; R. Moniez, " Faune des eaux souterraincs du departemeut du Nord &c.," extrait de
la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France, tome i. (1888-1889), p. 53.
Specific diagnosis. Body somewhat slender. Pleura of the second, third, fourth, and
fifth segments of the pleon moderately produced, not deeper than their respective
segments ; their inferior margins well supplied with setae, especially in the fifth
segment. Extremity of the telson forming a narrow projection much longer than
broad, narrowing distally, the truncate extremity tipped with rather long setae. Lower
antennte about three-fourths as long as the body ; flagellum much longer than the
pedvincle, which is slender and has the fifth joint twice as long as the fourth. Legs
slender; joints scarcely expanded, the first four pairs not very abundantly supplied with
setae. Lower lip with each half subtriangular, with the inner distal angle somewhat
acute. Inner lobe of the first maxilla broad, expanded distally, and bearing about nine
long plumose setae.
Colour. Translucent.
Length. Rather more than half an inch (15 mm.).
Habitat. Eyreton {Chilton) and Ashburton (W. W. Smith), in wells.
Detailed Description.
Unfortvmately I have no male specimen of this species, all the few specimens I liave
seen, about ten altogether, being females. The following detailed description applies
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 197
therefore to the female only, though doubtless it will apply cqvially well to the male,
except as regards the first and fourth appendnges of the pera?on and the second pleopoda,
which are specially modified in the male.
I described this species pretty fully in my original paper [23], and in the present
paper I have given a full detailed description of the new species P. assimilis, and I
shall therefore give only such further details of P. iypicus as are necessary to exhibit
clearly the differences between the two species.
Pof/y (PI. XVIII. fig. 1). It will be seen, from a comparison of PI. XVI. fig. 1 and
PI. XVIII. fig. 1, that the body is much more slender than in P. assimilis ; thus iu one
specimen that I bave mounted dry on a slide, and from wbich fig. 1, PL XVIII. is taken,
tiie body is fully 15 mm. long, yet the depth is only 1'5 mm., the same as the depth of
a specimen of P. assimilis that was only 10"5 mm. long.
The surface of the whole body is smooth, and though there are a few fine setae
scattered over it, chiefly in the pleon, they are not so numerous nor so distinctly
arranged in small tufts as in P. assimilis.
FercEon (PI. XVIII. fig. 1). The first segment is very short, not half so long as the
succeeding; it widens inferiorly, and has the inferior angle somewhat produced and brought
close up to the head, so that the first pair of appendages of the pera3on seem almost to
arise from the head. The next three segments are subequal and rather longer than deep ;
they are quite rectangular in outline, the inferior margin being almost straight and
scarcely hollowed, except slightly iu the first segmeut for the reception of the coxa of
the appendage, which is small and placed well to the anterior end of each segment.
The next three segments are similar, but each is shorter than the preceding segment ;
the inferior margin of each is emarginated towards the posterior end for the triangular
coxa.
Pleon (figs. 1, 11). In the pleon this species resembles P. assimilis as above
described, but the pleural portions are not so largely developed, being somewhat
shallower than their respective segments, and their inferior margins are more abundantly
supplied with sette. In each segment there is a slight ridge where the pleural portion
leaves the body -ring proper, but the integument is quite continuous, and there is no
buture or line of division of any kind.
The projection at the end of the telson (tig. 12) is narrow, longer than broad, projects
slightly upwards, and has the truncate extremity tijiped with a fcAV setae ; there is a
stout seta below at its base ; the inferior margin of the telson on each side from this
projection to the articulation of the uropoda is irregular and fringed with very fine
setae.
The upper anteuna (fig. 2) extends a little beyond the extremity of the third joint of
the peduncle of the lower antennae ; it usually contains eight joints, but is not distinctly
divided into peduncle and flagcUum. The first three joints are similar, but each smaller
than the preceding, oblong, about twice as long as broad, with a few setse at the distal
end ; the fourth joint is like the third, but shorter ; the fifth shorter still, but somewhat
expanded distally ; the sixth and seventh are subequal to each other and to the first joint
and are considerably swollen ; the eighth joint is usually small, but swollen ; the last
2G*
198 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
three bear at. the extremity one or two small " olfactory cylinders" of the usual shape
in addition to a few simple setse.
The lower antennoi (fig. 2) are about three-fourths as long as the body, the flagellum
being much longer than the peduncle. The first two joints are subequal, short, as broad
as long, without setse ; the third is as long as the first and second together, its upper margin
slightly convex, lower margin straight, one or two small setae on the lower margin at
the distal end ; the fourth is about half as long again as the third, but slightly narrower,
sides straight and parallel, one or two small setie on the margins, and tufts of longer
setae above and below at the extremity ; the fifth joint is similar to the fourth but about
twice as long, each margin bears about four small setse and there are tufts of longer
setse at the end ; the first joint of the flagellum is about twice as long as the second,
which is about as broad as long ; the remaining joints (about 35 altogether) gradually
become longer and narrower till at the end each is about six times as long as broad,
each bears one or two small setae at the distal end, but toward the extremity of the
flagellum these become very small.
The upper lip does not difl'er in any important respect from that of P. assimilis.
The mandibles (fig. 3) also appear to resemble those of P. assimilis, but the left
mandible has only three teeth on the terminal cutting-edge, with three also on the
secondary cutting-edge. In the specimen from which I have taken the drawing (fig. 3),
these teeth are much sharper and more acute than those showTi in the figure of P. as-
similis (PI. XVI. fig. 6), but this is probably due to the fact that they belong to a
younger specimen. In the figure they are flattened out so as to be seen full in front,
while those of P. assimilis are seen in profile.
The lower lip (PI. XVIII. fig. 4) differs considerably in shape from that of P. assimilis.
Each lobe is triangular, inner margin straight, outer margin very convex, especially
toward the base, the extremity being more or less acute, not rounded, and there is a
small projection on the inner margin at some little distance fi*om the extremity. The
extremity is densely covered with long setae ; the inner margins and the distal portions
of the outer margins are fringed with fine setae.
The first maxilla (fig. 5) bears a general resemblance to that of P. assimilis, but
the inner lobe is much broader, especially toward the extremity, which is rounded and
bears about 9 or 10 long plumose setiB, about twice as many as in P. assimilis. The two
simple setfB also present at the extremity are situated near the base of the third and
fourth setae respectively from the outer margin of the lobe. In P. assimilis they are
situated at the base of the two inner setae.
The second maxillcB (fig. 6) differ from those of P. assimilis in the following points : —
The inner margin of the basal portion is more convex, and bears a very distinct row of
long plumose setae, which have thickened bases ; those at the distal end have the base
quite short, but toward the proximal end of the row the bases become gradually longer.
At the lower end of the row on the surface of the base is another somewhat imperfect
row of simple setae. The inner (fixed) lobe is longer than in P. assimilis and has the end
more rounded, and the long plumose setse, instead of being confined to the extremity,
extend for some distance along the inner margin toward the base.
CRUSTACEA OP NEW ZEALAND. 19!)
The maxillipedes are practically identical with those of P. assimilis, but the " grappling
setse " are slightly different, being long curved setae slightly hooked at the end ; they thus
resemble those of P. australis, but are more slender. In the specimen dissected there
are two on one side and tliree on the other. P. assimilis has two on each side, and they
are straight, with hooks at the end.
'Ihe. first pair of legs of the female (PI. XVIII. figs. 7, 8) are much more slender than in
P. assimilis. The coxa is small, shallow, partly cleft below and ankylosed to the body-
segment. The bases is narrow oblong, about threa times as long as broad, and is almost
free from seta3 except a small tuft at the extremity on the posterior margin. The ischium
is nearly as broad as the basos ; posterior margin straight, with three or four miuute
spinules ; anterior margin slightly produced in the centre and bearing a stout seta at this
point. The meros is subtriangular, and bas the posterior margin straight, with a few setae
at the extremity ; the anterior margin is convex and produced distally into a rounded
loloe extending about halfway along the carpus, the edge of this lobe next the carpus
l)eing fringed with stout setge. Tlie carpus is suboblong, its junction with the meros
being oblique ; on the posterior margin there is a small seta near the base and a small
tuft of larger setae toward the extremity. Ihc propodos is subtriangular, expanding
distally, longer than the meros ; the anterior margin convex, especially toward the base,
and bearing one or two minute sette and a small tuft at the base of the dactylos ; the
posterior margin is straight, produced at the extremity to define the palm, the postero-
distal angle being thickly covered with setae. The palm is oblique, concave, and bears five
or six very acute setae with expanded bases, those nearest the base of the dactylos being
the best marked, the others gradually becoming more slender until they are indis-
tinguishable from tbe ordinary stout setae at the postero-distal angle ; in addition to these
the palms bear a few simple setae. The dactylos is somewhat stout, longer than the palm,
both margins bearing a few spinules, the extremity being separated off as a distinct
tooth.
The peculiar setae on the palm are of the same kind as those described in the male of
Phreatoicus austraUs [26, pi. xxiv. fig. 5 a], but they are not so stout and well marked.
The female of that species has the first pair of legs very like those described above, but
shorter and stouter and more spiniform, and the palm more oblique and not concave.
Th.e second pair of legs {'n^. ^y in vs.i\\eY longer than the first pair; the coxa, hasos,
and ischium arc similar to the corresponding joints of the first pair ; the meros is sub-
triangular, about three-fourths as long as the ischium, posterior margin straight and
fringed with a few setae, the anterior margin slightly convex, and with the antero-distal
angle slightly produced, a few setae on the margin and at the extremity ; the carpus is
oblong, not so long as the meros, posterior margin straight and with a few setae, anterior
margin nearly straight, and with setae at tbe extremity only ; fropodos similar to the
carpus but usually a little longer, the extremity produced into a small triangular lobe at
the side of the dactylos ; dactylos nearly half as long as the propodos, extremity forming
a distinct nail, with a small tooth at its base.
The third sinA. fourth pairs of legs are similar to the second and of the same size.
The fifth, sixth, and seventh pairs of legs (see fig. 10) are similar to each other, but
200 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
each is larger than the preceding. The coxa is deepei- than in the first four pair of legs
and is triangular, fitting into a triangular euiargination in the inferior margin of the
segment ; in the fifth segment this is at the posterior end, but in the sixth and seventh
it approaches nearer the centre, though still in the posterior half of the margin. The
basos is only slightly expanded, being oblong, about three times as long as broad, both
margins somewhat scantily supplied with setse. The ischium is very long, being consider-
ably longer than the basos, narrow oblong ; front margin straight, with five or six setae ;
posterior margin a little convex, with a few spiniform sette. The meros not half so long as
the ischium; postero-distal angle a little produced; both margins with spiniform setae, those
at the extremity being very strong. The carpus and propodos similar, the carpus usually
longer than the propodos; both oblong, and both margins supplied with spiniform setae
arranged in tufts, those on the anterior margin being larger than those on the posterior.
The dactylos as in the preceding legs, but longer and more slender.
The above description applies to the fifth, sixth, and seventh pairs of legs, but it is to
be remembered that tiie spines as described above are larger and more numerous in the
sixth than in the fifth, and in the seventh than in the sixth.
The pleopoda appear to be similar to those of P. ussimilis, but are rather more
slender ; the fifth pleopoda are very short and small.
The uropoda (fig. 12) differ from those of P. assimilis only in being longer and more
slender, and in having the seta' on the inferior margin of the peduncle smaller and not
arranged in distinct tufts, but evenly distributed along the whole margin.
In one of the females examined, brood-plates were beginning to appear at the bases of
the appendages of the perseon; one of these is shown in the drawing of the second pair
of legs (fig. 9) .
Comparison of the three known Species of Phreatoicus.
When I first received the specimens of the Phreatoicus from Winchester along with
the other species which were known from Eyreton (i. e. Calliop'ms subterraneus, Gam-
marusfragilis, and Cruregens fontanus), I naturally thought that they would belong to
the Eyreton species Phreatoicus typicus ; and thougli at the time I noticed that there
were a few variations, I thought that these might jirove to be due to differences of age
or sex. I was therefore somewhat surprised to find on a close examination that this
was not the case, but that the differences were quite sufficient to warrant the creation of
another species, viz. P. assimilis. Besides being found at Eyreton Phreatoicus typicus
is also known from Ashburton, only about 30 miles from Winchester, where Phreatoicus
assimilis is found ; and the existence of two subterranean species of the same genus being
so near each other is a fact of considerable importance, and it would be interesting to
know whether the species have differentiated since adopting a subterranean life, or
whether they have descended from two difierent surface species. It is therefore desirable
that the differences between them should be clearly set forth, and that they should be
compared not only with each other but also with the species Phreatoicus aiistralis [26],
found on the top of the Mt. Kosciusko plateau in Australia, and at a height of nearly
6000 feet above the sea.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 201
It is quite possible that on an examination of a greater number of specimens from
various localities the differences between P. tijpious and P. assimilis may partially or
wholly break down ; but, so far as my observations at present go, the Ashburton specimen
of P. tupicKS is practically identical with those from Eyreton and differs from P. assimilis
in the following points : —
(1) The body and the appendages are much more slender than in P. assimilis.
This character is of course only a relative one and therefore difficult to estimate
with accuracy, but in my specimens the differences, especially in the legs and
the lower antennre, are very mai'ked.
(2) The pleura of the second to fifth pleon-segments, inclusive, are not so greatly deve-
loped and have all the inferior margins regularly supplied with moderately stout
setae. In P. assimilis the pleura are considerably deeper than their respective
segments and have the inferior margins only sparsely fringed with spinules.
(3) The shape of the projection at the end of the telson is quite different in the two
species.
(4) The shape of the lobes of the lower lip also differs to some extent.
(5) The inner lobe of the first maxilla is broader distally and bears fully twice as
many long plumose seta? as in P. assimilis.
(6) There are slight differences in the second maxilla? ; thus the long plumose setse
on the innermost lobe extend some distance along the inner margin, while
in P. assimilis they are pretty well confined to the extremity ; the rows of
setye along the inner margin of the basal portion also differ in character.
(7) The grappling-setae of the maxillipedes also differ slightly.
The differences in the mouth-parts are somewhat peculiar, and were quite unsuspected
when I had from other reasons already perceived that there were two species. The differ-
ences in the inner lolie of the first maxillae are very noticeable.
Of the two, P. assimilis approaches more nearly to P. anstmlis than P. typicus does,
and I am inclined to think that, leaving out of account the special characters which are
due to their subterranean life, P. assimilis is more closely related to P. australis than it
is to P. typicus. The two former agree with each other and differ from P. typicus in
the following points : —
(1) The stouter body and appendages.
(2) The shape of the lobes of the lower lip.
(3) The inner lobe of the first maxilla bears only 4 or 5 pkimose setae.
(4) The pleura of the jileon-segments are almost equally well developed in both.
On the other hand, P. australis has the projection at the end of the telson rather more
like that of P. typicus, and in the second maxillae and the maxillipedes it is also quite as
close to P. typicus as to P. assimilis, if not closer ; but in the last two points the differences
of all three species are very trivial.
Phreatoicus australis di&ers from both the subterranean species in the following points,
in addition to those which are evidently due to the different modes of life: —
(1) The body and especially the legs and pleura of the pleon are more abundantly
supplied with setae.
202 DK. C. CHJLTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
(2) The telson proper is much shorter and rounder.
(3) The inferior margin of tlie sixth segment of the pleon bears about 15 setae instead
of only 4 in front of the articulation of the uropoda.
(4) The first pair of legs in both sexes differ slightly in the shape of the propodos and
in tlie armature of the palm.
(5) There are also slight differences in the maxillipedes.
(6) The body is much stouter than in either of the subterranean species.
Without a much fuller knowledge of tlie habits of each species than we possess, it is
difficult to see the reason for the dilferences between them ; aud until we are able to do
this, to some extent, it will be almost impossible to assign its true importance to each
difference and thus to discover the true relationships of the species. The abundant setse
on P. australis are perhaps j)rotective ; and, if so, we can see why they should be less
abundant in the subterranean forms, though even in these species they are pretty
numerous, especially on the last three pairs of legs. The slender body and appendages
of JP. ti/incus may also be an adaptation to a subterranean moLie of life, aud, if so, it
would ajDpear that P. ty^icuis has been longer underground than P. assimilis ; but in the
present state of our knowledge all speculations of this kind must be received with the
greatest caution. The questions suggested may perhaps be some day solved by the
discovery of species of Phreatoicus still living above ground in the mountain-streams of
the Southern Alps, places where very little search of the kind required has hitherto
been made.
It is worthy of notice that the species of Phreatoicus do not show the increase in the
number of sensory setae, &c., in compensation for the loss of eyes that has been observed
in some other subterranean species. (See p. 262.)
Sjjecial points in the Structure q/' Phreatoicus.
In many respects Phreatoicus appears to be a very generalized type of the Isopoda,
possessing all the segments of the body and their appendages in a more perfect form thaii
any other Isopod I know. Thus in the body all the segments both of the peryeon and
the pleon are well developed and separate, except of course that the telson is joined to
the sixth segment of the pleon as in nearly all Isopoda. The antennte, thougli well
developed, do not present any peculiarity, and tlie lower antenna does not possess the
rudimentary exopodite found in some genera of the Aseliida?, such as Janira, lanthe,
Stenetrium [9, p. 9]. The mouth-parts are all particularly well developed, no parts
usual in the Isopoda being absent or coalesced ; the maxillipedes especially have all the
joints perfect and separate. The legs of the peraeon all have the coxae more or less
separate from the segment, showing, 1 think, clearly that they are really the iirst joints
of the legs, and not outgrowths of the body-ring (" epimera "). This view was first
advanced by Spence Bate in 1855 [7], and has, I believe, since been pretty generally
adopted, though, as Stebbing says, " It is a disputed question whether we have at the
base of the leg an outgrowth of the body -ring carrying the more or less obsolescent first
joint of the leg soldered to it, or whether the side-plate is itself a protective expansion of
the first joint" [108, p. 1730]. In quoting Spence Bate's arguments to show that the
CEIJSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 203
so-called " epimera " are really the coxre of the legs, Stebbing [108, p. 289] appears
rather to favour the first vievr. Against this I may call attention to the fact that, in
Phrcatoicits, in the segments of the pleon the pleural portion of the body-ring lias grown
out to form a protection to the pleopoda, the coxal portion of which is present, but is in
no way attached to this outgrowth of the body-ring, and the outgrowth is quite
continuous with the body-ring, not being marked off by any suture or line of division.
The same tiling is of course true of the pleon of most Amphipoda. Thus tbese true
outgrowths of the body-ring npjjcar clearly marked off from the " epimera," which are
either quite separate from the body-ring, or have a suture clearly showing the line of
division, a fact that can be easily accounted for if the " epimera " are formed solely from
the coxa3 of the legs.
In the pleopoda of Phreatoiciis we find several peculiarities which will probably be
useful in helping us to trace out the homologies of the pleopoda of other Isopods. All
the pleopoda have the basal portion, the " protopodite," present and of moderate size, and
in the third, fourth, and fifth pleopoda this bears a fair-sized " cpipodite." The existence
of this epipodite is a point of considerable interest. I am not aware of any other case
where the epipodite is present in any of the pleopoda of Isopods. In the ' Journal of
the Royal Microscopical Society ' for October 1891 (p. 593), in an abstract of a paper by
Dr. J. Nusbaum [80] on "The Morphology of Isopodan Feet," it is stated that, according
to the author, the epipodite of the thoracic legs has fused Avith the ventral wall of the
body-segments. If this should be so in the pcroeon it certainly does not apjiear to be
the case with the posterior pleopoda of Fhreatolcus. There is no trace of the epipodite
in the first and second pairs of pleopoda, nor can I suggest any reason for its
absence.
Both the exopodite and the endopodite are present in all the pleopoda, both being
large flat j^lfites, apparently branchial in function. In all the pleopoda, except the first
pair, the exopodite consists of tAvo joints. This character is also possessed by some of the
pleopoda of lanthe [16], Mhhiui [27, p. 11], and some allied genera, but the more
general rule among the Isopoda is that the exopodite consists of one joint only. In the
second pleopoda of the male, although there is a " peiiial filament," the whole pleopod
has been very little modified, and it is quite easy to recognize the various parts, and to
see that the penial filament is only a specialized portion of the endopodite. In Luithe
[16], Ilnnna [27, p. 10], Iclinosoma, and Acaiitlioinnnna [9, p. 40] much further modifi-
cation of the pleopod has taken place, and it is not so easy to see the homologies of the
various parts. Thus both Bovallius and Beddard consider the large triangular portion
which forms the main part of the pleopod to be the protopodite, and Beddard considers
the penial filament to be the endopodite, and the exopodite to be represented by a small
membranous portion at its base. Whether this is really so, or whether this view AviU
require modification, is a question that must be left for future determination ; but this
interpretation of the various parts does not appear to harmonize Avell Avith Avhat we find
in Phreatoicus.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 27
204 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
Affinities q/'Plireatoicus.
Phreatoicus presents so many peculiarities that it is difficult to determine its exact
systematic position, and its affinities must therefore be discussed at some length. The
followin"- account is partly reproduced from my jiaper on Phreatoicus australis [26], but
it has been revised and to some extent made more complete.
When I originally described the genus Phreatoicus in 1882 [23], I placed it in the
Isopoda, and pointed out various separate resemblances to the Idoteidse, the Anthuridoe,
and the Tanaidae, and also drew attention to the several resemblances to the Amphipoda ;
but after doing this I left the exact position of the genus among the other Isoj)oda
an open question for the time. When preparing the " Critical List of the Crustacea
Malacostraca of New Zealand" [111, p. 151] Mr. Thomson, judging from the general
api^earance (he had not had an opportunity of examining specimens), was inclined to
place it under the Amphipoda, and, as I did not agree with this opinion, it was arranged
that the genus should be placed between the Amphipoda and the Isopoda under a
separate heading with the following note: — "The systematic position of this singular
Crustacean is doubtful. In general appearance I was inclined to place it among the
Amphipoda, but from the fact of the first five pairs of 2'>t<^opoda acting as branchial
organs, and from the absence of any such organs attached to the ];>ereion, Mr. Chilton
places it among the Isopoda. — G. M. T." [Ill, p. 161].
Unfortunately, however, the separate heading was omitted by some error, probably on
the part of the printer, and the genus therefore appears under the last family of the
Amphipoda, viz. the Platyscelidce, as though it belonged to that family. It is no wonder,
therefore, that the Rev. T. Pi/. R. Stebbing, in his notice of the " Critical List," says, in
speaking of Phreatoicus, " I do not know what are the special reasons for classing it
among the Platyscelidge." He also says, " The list [?. e. our ' Critical List '] continues
with ' Suborder II. Isopoda. Tribe I. Anisopoda. Pam. I. Tanaidje ; ' and probably
the affinities of Phreatoicus will eventually prove to be rather with the Tanaidse than
with the Hyperina" [108, p. 587]. In another reference to the species Phreatoicus
tijinciis, Mr. Stebbing calls it " a singular well-shrimp of a new genus and species, which
appears to be an Isopod with some remarkable Amphipodan affinities " [108, p. 543].
At first sight Phreatoicus certainly does look very like an Amphipod, but on exami-
nation this is found to be due to superficial resemblances only, and not to any real
affinity to that group. These resemblances appear to be as follows : —
(1) The body, especially in the pleon, is more or less laterally compressed.
(2) The pleura of the segments of the pleon are produced downwards, so as to
protect the pleopoda on either side, just as in the Amphipoda.
(3) The legs of the pera^on consist of an anterior series oifour and a posterior series
of three.
(4) The general appearance of the legs and of the uropoda is not unlike that
common among the Araphij^oda.
(5) The pleon is formed of six separate segments, and is better developed than in
most Isopoda.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 205
I think these are aU the points in which Fhrcatoicus specially resembles the Amphi-
poda, and an examination of them shows that none is of any particular imiiortance in its
bearing on the systematic position of the genus. I will take the points one by one
under their appropriate numbers as given above.
(1) Most of the Isopoda are, it is true, more or less dorso-ventrally compressed, and I
do not know of any one in which there is any lateral compression as in Fhreatoicns ; but
here the lateral compression is not great, and is chiefly confined to the plcon, where the
downward prolongation of the pleura is no doubt a special adaptation for the protection
of the pleopoda, and may very well have arisen quite independently of the similar
adaptation in the Amphipoda. The pencon of Fhreatoicns is subcylindrical, and thus
resembles Anthura and Faranthura, and other genera of the Anthuridte [lOG], and some
species of Idotea, such as Idotea elongata [24, p. 198], in which there is no dorso-ventral
compression. On the other hand, lateral compression is by no means universal among
the Amphipoda ; there are many genera where the body is more or less cylindrical, as in
Caprella &c., Coi'opJdiim, Haplocheira, and many others, while there are also some,
such as Icillus, Iphigeiila, and Cijamiis, in which the body is much flattened, as in most
Isopoda.
(2) This point has practically already been disposed of in the consideration of (1), and
I need only add that Phreatoicus has the pleura of the first five segments of the jileon
produced downwards, while in the Amphipoda it is only in the first three segments that
the pleura are so produced.
(3) The division of the appendages of the pera^on into an anterior series of four and
a posterior series of three has been used by Dana in separating the Anisopoda from the
typical Isojioda, and it is by no means a special Amphipodan character. It is, more-
over, probably of little importance from a systematic j'oint of view, seeing that it is
found in such widely different genera as FJireatoicus, Stenetrium, Iliinnopsls, Tanais,
and Arcturus, and its adojition as the chief bond of connection between a number of
forms results, as Professor Haswell bas pointed out, in " an extremely artificial arrange-
ment " [55, p. 10].
(4) The appendages of the joeraeon appear at first sight undoubtedly Amphipodan, but
here, again, a closer examination shows that the resemblance is merely superficial, for in
all the legs we find that the ischium is faiidy long, often as long or even longer than the
preceding joint, the basos, w^hile in almost all the Ampliipoda the ischium is quite short,
often transverse. In the possession of moderately long ischia, Fhreatoicns agrees with
most other Isopoda. I am not aware that anyone but myself has drawn attention to this
difference between the Isopoda and the Amphipoda ; but it appears to lie one of very
general application, though, of course, there are some exceptions to it as to every other
rule in Natural Science. Thus, in the Apseudida^ and the Tanaidie [106], the ischium is
usually short, while in a few cases in the Amphipoda it is long, as in the second gnatlio-
poda of the Lysianassidte, and also in the second gnathopoda of Seba [108, p. 783], and
perhaps in a few others. But in all these cases that I know of in the Amphipoda the
long ischium is found in one pair of legs only, and I know of no Amphi^jod that has the
ischium in each pair of legs long as in the Isopoda ; so that, while the possession of short
27*
206 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
iscliia would not necessarily prove that the animal is not an Isopool (unless, indeed, we
remove the Apseudidte and the Tanaidae to the Amphipoda, and this, notwithstanding
Gerstaecker's opinion, does not seem to be desirable), the fact that it possesses long ischia
in all the appendages of the perseon is a pretty clear indication that it is not an
Amphipod.
It may also be pointed out that although the first appendage of the perfeon of Phrea-
toicns is subchelate, as in the Amphijioda, the second appendage resembles the third in
being quite simple, while in the Amphipoda the second appendage is usually subchelate
like the first, or, if not actually subchelate, it shows a greater tendency to resemble the
first leg than the third.
(5) In the possession of a long pleon of six separate segments, Phreatoicns certainly
resembles the Amphipoda, and differs from most Isopods, but the same character is also
possessed by the Apseudida? and the Tanaidae, and by the genus Hysswra [106, p. 128] in
the Anthuridpe ; and in many other Isopods, such as Limnoria and many of the Cymo-
thoidfe, Oniscidaj, &c., the plcon, though not long, is composed of more or less separate
segments.
The reasons given above will, I think, be quite sufficient to prove that there are no
good grounds for classing Plireatoicus with the Amphipoda ; for positive evidence that it
is an Isopod it will be sufficient to take the following : —
(1) The first five pairs of pleopoda are branchial, and there are no branchial plates
attached to the ap^iendages of the peraeon. The pleopoda themselves are
quite different in form from those of the Amphipoda.
(2) The whole of the mouth-j)arts are distinctly Isopodan in character, and quite
different from those of the Amphipoda.
(3) As shown above, the legs are really Isopodan, though at first sight they may
appear to be Amphipodan.
(4) The telson is joined to tlie sixth segment of the pleon, as is usually the case with
the Isopoda, but not with the Amphipoda. It is quite true, as Stebbing [108,
p. 549] has pointed out, that this is also the case with certain Amphipoda, the
Hyperina for example ; but this is exceptional, and since Plireatoicus is certainly
not one of the Syiicrina, it does not affect the present argument. The large
size and the form of the telson itself also clearly mark it off from the
Amphipoda.
It will be noticed that, in considering the differences between the Isopoda and Amphi-
poda, I have confined myself to external characters. Other important differences in the
internal anatomy have l)een pointed out by Blanc [12], but the material at my disposal
did not permit of my testing Plireatoicus by these points, even if I had possessed the
necessary skill to do so.
We have now to compare Plireatoicus with the other Isopoda to see what place it
should take among them. It will be sufficient if we compare it with the Tanaidae,
AnthuridtB, Idotcidae, and the Asellidae.
It agrees with the Tanaidte in the cylindrical form of the body, in the direction of the
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 207
leo-s, and in the possession of a pleon formed of six separate secjments. All these
characters are, however, separately shared hy other groups, and the differences in other
respects are very considerable, and we may safely conclude that Phreato'icus has no very
close affinity with the Tanaidae.
The Apseudidro, which rank close to the Tanaidre, do not seem to present any greater
affinity to Phreatoictis.
The resemblance of the Anthuridfe is, however, somewhnt greater. There is a fairly
good general resemblance in the shape of the body and in the legs, and though the pleon
is usually short in the Anthurida?, it is often composed of separate segments, and these
may be of fair length, as in the genus Hyssura, Norman and Stebbiug [lOG, p. 128].
The mouth-parts are very different, being specially modified in the Anthuridfe for the
purpose of suction, and this, combined with differences in the pleopoda, uropoda, &c., is
sufficient to make a pretty wide difference between the two.
With tlie Idoteida3, Phreatoicus agrees in the shape of tlie body, in the antennae, and
to some extent in the mouth-parts. In the Idoteida? these are more modified tlian in
Phreatoicus, though formed on the same plan, and the mandible has no palp. It is
probable, however, tliat the presence or absence of a mandibular palp is not a point of
great systematic importance, for in the Amphipoda we have genera, in other respects
closely similar, differing in this point ; thus tlie old genus Ilontagua, Spence Bate, has
been divided into Stenothoe, in which the mandible has no palp, and 3Ietopa, in which
the palp is present [108, p. 293]. A much more important difference is found in the
structure of the pleon and the uropoda. In the Idotcidtc the segments of the pleon,
except the last, are usually very short and more or less coalesced and the uropoda form
flat plates covering up the pleopoda. There are, however, sufficient signs that the pleon
of IdoteidtB has been derived from a pleon formed of separate segments, and that the
uropoda, though now very different, are simply a modified form of the typical uropoda
consisting of a peduncle and two rami ; and it is quite probable that the special modifications
of the Idoteidse in these respects are of comparative recent date, and that their ancestors
presented a much closer resemblance to Phreato'icus tlian the present Idoteidae do.
The Arcturidae, again, might be compared with Phreatoicus in much the same way,
but they present a further resemblance in the legs, which, though very different in
form, are very distinctly divided into an anterior series of four and a posterior series
of three.
When we come to compare Phreatoicus with the Asellidre we at once see a very "-reat
difference in the form of the body, but on closer examination the resemblances are seen
to be much more numerous and much closer than might at first siglit be expected. The
head, antennce, mouth-parts, and the legs are all in pretty close agreement; the resem-
blance in the mouth-parts is indeed somewhat striking, and altliough the legs of the last
three pairs are more Amphipodan and flattened, there is a general resemblance in the
relative lengths of the different joints to those of Asellus. In describing P/«-f«/oit';/s
australls I took Sars's description of Asellus aquaticus [91, pp. 96-100] as my guide, and
was able to follow it pretty closely. The uropoda, again, are not very unlike those of
Asellus, and the pleopoda of Phreatoicus appear to present more resemblances to those
208 DE. C. CHILTON OX THE SUBTEEEANEAN
of the Asellidse tliau to those of any other Isopods that I know. Besides differing
very greatly in the shape of the body, Phreatolcits differs greatly from the Asellidse, as
from the Idoteidse, in the structure of the pleon. In the Asellidse this is short, usually
composed of a single flattened piece, and the pleopoda lie horizontally under it, and are
protected by a more or less perfect operculum formed of the first pair. In Fhreatolcus
the segments of the pleon are all separate, and tlie pleopoda hang vertically down, and
are not protected below; indeed the shape of the pleon renders protection of the pleopoda
below unnecessary.
These differences are pretty considerable and quite enough to show that Fhreafoicus
cannot be placed under the Asellidse, but they are of such a nature that they do not
prevent us from considering that the affinities of Phreatoicus are with the Asellidse. For
it is quite clear that the latter must have arisen from ancestors possessing a pleon formed
of six separate segments, and that these have gradually coalesced to form a single plate ;
just as we see the same process going on at the present time in the Idoteidse, where some
species have the pleon formed of four or five segments, others of only two or three,
and others, again, like Idotea elongata, Miers, with the pleon formed of a single piece
[2tl, p. 198]. The horizontal position of the pleopoda and the development of an
operculum from the first pair would naturally follow from the flattening of the body in
the Asellidse, which would otherwise leave the pleopoda much exposed below. Thus
Phreutoiciis appears to differ from the Asellidse chiefly in having preserved the fully-
developed pleon which must have been possessed by the ancestors of the Asellide, while
in the latter this has been specially modified in accordance with the general flattening of
the body, which would render a long-jointed pleon unsuitable and a source of danger to
the animal, especially by the exjiosure to which it would subject the pleopoda. The
flattening of the body in the Asellidae would naturally follow as the result of their
adopting a creeping mode of life ; Phreatoicus wallas erect or swims much in the same
way as the Amphipoda.
There is one genus, Limnoria, formerly classed with the Asellidse, which differs from
them and resembles Phreutoiciis in having the pleon composed of six separate segments
with the pleopoda unprotected. Limnoria, however, resembles the normal Asellidse in the
flat depressed body, and the segments of the pleon, though separate, are short, and it may
perhaps be looked upon as an approach toward the ancestral form of the Asellidse,
though its structure has been modified to some exteut to suit its mode of life ; thus the
antenuse are very short, and the legs are short and perhaps little used for walking, and
the mouth-parts are somewhat modified. Unfortunately, I do not know sufficient of the
pleopoda of Limnoria to compare them with those of Asellus and Phreatoicns, but from
the other resemblances we may with good reason look upon Limnoria as an intermediate
link, to some extent connecting Phreatoimis with the AsellidEe. The very great difference
in appearance between the two latter is due to the fact that the body of the Asellidse is
flat, depressed, and the animals are tho-efore represented as seen from above, while,
owing to its body being somewhat laterally compressed, Phreatoicns is usually seen in
side view. This difference in the form of the body is, however, probably not of much
CEUSTACEA OF XEW ZEALAND. 209
importance from a systematic point of view, for we have great differences in this respect
in species of Idotea and in some of the Cymothoid;ie, and, on tlie whole, I think we must
place PhrcatoicMS somewhere near to the Asellidte, hut forming a separate family, the
Phreatoicidte, which bears to the Asellidse somewhat the same relation that the Caprcllidae
do to the Cyamidas in the Amphipoda. Limnoria may perhaps be placed, as is done by
many authors, in a separate family, the Limnoriidte, possessing some of the ancestral
characters of the Asellida?, and thus approaching nearer to the Phreatoicidse. Gerstaecker
puts Limnoria under the Sjihreronida?, hut forming a separate section, the Limnorhui
[45, p. 220].
Prom what has been already said it will be seen that Phreatoicus occupies a fairly
central position among the Isopoda, retaining to a greater extent than any others the
typical characters of the Isopoda.
The following are the characters which I have provisionally advanced for the new
family Phreatoicida). These are simply given for the sake of comparison, and will no
doubt require revision when other forms allied to Phreatoicus are discovered : —
Family PHPEATOICID.E.
" Body subcylindrical, more or less laterally compressed. Mandibles with a well-
developed appendage. Legs distinctly^ divided into an anterior series of four and a
posterior series of three. Pleopoda broad and foliaceous and branchial in function, but
not protected by an operculum. Pleon * large, of six distinct segments. Uropoda
styUform." [26, p. 151.]
Pamily ANTHURIDiE.
Genus Cruregens, Chilton.
(Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xiv. p. 175.)
The following characters were assigned to this genus when I originally described it : —
" Body subcylindrical. Head small. First six thoracic segments subequal, the seventh
small and 'withont appendages. Antennte subequal, neither having a flagellum. First
pair of thoracic legs large and subchelate, the second and third subchelate but smoller ;
the three posterior pairs simple. First pair of abdominal appendages formmg an
operculum enclosing the branchial plates, last pair biramous. Telson squamiform."
It is scarcely necessary^ to explain that the above description w^as drawn up by^ a tvro
in the study of the Crustacea, and that though modelled on the descriptions given by
others of allied genera, it contains much that is unnecessary and little that is essential.
The genus appears to fall under Norman and Stebbing's [106] " Section B," though
the mouth-parts are even more modified than in the species assigned to this section by
these authors. The following generic diagnosis may be given for the sake of comjiarison
* I have substituted " pleoii '" for " abdomen,"' which I had inadvertently put Ln my original diagnosis.
210 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
Avith Norman and Stebbing's descriptions; but even this must be considered merely
provisional, as only the one species is known, and nothing is known of tlie distinctive
characters of the tw^o sexes : —
Eyes wanting. Segments of the jileon separate (in both sexes ?). Both pairs of
antennoe Avithout distinct flagella (in adults ?). Mandibles without palp. Maxillipedes
not divided into separate joints. Last segment of the perseon small and without
ajipendages (in adults ?).
All the specimens that I have seen, many scores in number, agree in having the
seventh segment of the 2iera3on small and without apjiendages ; but as I have never seen
a specimen that I could be certain was sexually mature, I am doubtful whether this
character would hold in the adult also or not. My specimens have been obtained from
several wells in different localities, and were collected at different times during a period
of about ten years, and it seems scarcely likely that all the specimens should be immature,
and that during the whole time not a single mature sjiecimen should be obtained, unless,
indeed, the adult differs from the immature form in habits in such a way as to prevent it
being liable to be drawn up by the pump. I have one specimen that has the integument
of the under surface of the perseon much expanded, somewhat in the same way as shown
by Stebbing in his figure of the " gravid female " of Faranthura nigro-punctata [106,
pi. xxvi. fig. ii. D, ? ] ; but in my specimen I can discover no trace of eggs or young, and
it appears to be the integument itself that is distended, and not a pouch formed by
brood-plates attached to the bases of the legs in the usual way ; so that I am uncertain
whether this specimen is really an adult female or is abnormal in some way, o\v^ing
perhaps to half-completed ecdysis or some similar cause.
All this uncertainty makes comparison of Cruregens with other genera of the
Anthuridse a very difficult task, but it aj^peavs to approach to Taranthura more nearly
than to any other. It resembles this genus generally in the antennoe (leaving out of
consideration the special brush-like antenna of the adult male in Parcmthiira), in the
perseon and its appendages, and in the pleon and the pleopoda, though the uropoda are
much more slender in Crnregeiis. It differs, however, in the mouth-parts, for the
mandibles have no palp and the maxillipedes have lost all trace of sejiarate joints. If
the absence of tlie seventh pair of legs is a character that holds in adults, this would
form another difference between the two genera.
It is to be noted that the seventh pair of legs appears to be developed at a later period
of the life-history in the Antliuridre than in other Isopoda, for sjiecimens without them,
but ap2)arently mature in other respects, are not infrequently met with. Besides
Ci'uregens w^e have the following examples : — Hyssura ■])roducta is founded on a single
specimen about a quarter of an inch long, of which Stebbing and Norman say " the last
segment of the person in the type specimen has no legs, nor can we see any sign of scars
where they would have been attached, and the specimen was otherwise quite perfect "
[106, p. 128] ; Faranthura neglecta, Beddard, is said to have the seventh segment of the
perfEou absent, the specimen is 6 millim. long, and from the absence of the last pair of
legs Beddard considers it to be immature, though he does not mention any other point of
immaturity about it [9, p. Ill] ; I have also a small specimen of an Anthurid from Port
CEIJSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 211
Jackson, probably Paranthura austrcdls, Ha.svvell, which lias only six pairs of legs, the
seventh segment of the pera^on being small and without appendages, as in Cruregens ;
my specimen is, however, only 3"5 millim. long, and is evidently immature.
Cruregens fontanus, Chilton. (PI. XIX. figs. 1-22.)
Cruregens fontanus, Chilton, New Zealand Journal of Science, vol. i. p. 44 (January 188.2) ; id.
Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. .\iv. p. 175, pi. x. figs. 1-12; id. ibid. vol. xv. p. 88;
Humbert, Archives des Sciences physiques et naturelles, t. viii. p. 25G (September 1882) ; Chilton,
New Zealand Jom-nal of Science, ii. p. 89 (March 1884) ; Thomson & Chilton, Transactions New
Zealand Institute, vol. xviii. p. 152; Moniez, " Faune des Eaux souterraines du Departement du
Nord &c.," extrait dc la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France, tome i. (1888-89) p. 53.
Specific diagnosin. No trace of eyes. Antennae subequal, upper slightly shorter than
the lower, and with four joints ; lower with the third joint only half as long as the fourth.
Pirst pair of legs with powerful subchelate hand; propodos triangular, broadest at base
palm straight, armed with two rows of setaj. Uropoda slender, inner branch narrow,
almost rod-like, not enclosing the end of the pleon. Telson linguiforin, extremity tipped
with three or four short setse.
Colour translucent, slightly yellowish, owing to the liver-tubes showing through the
transparent integument.
Length of largest specimens about 12 mm.
Rabitut. Eyreton, North Canterbury {Chilton); Leeston {Ii. M. Luing) ; Winchester,
South Canterbury {JJ. L. Imoood) (in wells).
Detailed Description.
The following detailed description is derived from the comparison and examination
of a considerable number of specimens. I can detect no differences between the
specimens from the various localities mentioned above.
Body (tig. 1). The body is cylindrical throughout; the head is slightly flattened
vertically and is smaller than the first segment of the peraeon. The first segment of the
perseon is rather shorter than the second and is rather loosely articulated to it, the body
being narrowed at this point, thus allowing free movement between the two ; the second
segment is in the same way loosely articulated to the third, though not quite to the
same extent ; the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth segments subequal, about as long as the
second, oblong in outline as seen in dorsal view, about half as long again as broad,
and firmly articulated together, the body not being narrowed at the articulations ;
the seventh segment is small, only about one-third as long as the sixth, and bears no
appendages.
Pleon (tig. 20). The pleon to the end of the telson is rather longer than the sixth
and seventh segments of the perseon. The first segment is longer than the succeedino',
the second, third, and fourth are subequal, the fifth longer than the first ; each of these
five segments quite separate and bearing a seta on each side ; the sixth segment is
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 28
212 Dl^ C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
lono-er than the fifth, widest in the centre, where its posterior margin is deeply cleft, and
in a dorsal view it does not extend quite to the sides of the pleon. It is apparently
clearly divided off from the telson, although this seems to be very exceptional in the
Isopoda.
The surface of the whole body is smooth and bears a few short separate setae scattered
over it, especially on the dorsal surface.
The upi^er antenna; (figs. 2, 3) are rather shorter than the lower; peduncle of three
joints : first joint the largest, with an " auditory seta " on its outer margin and one
or two simple setae at the extremity ; second joint about two-thirds the length of
the first and narrower, with two " auditory setae " and one or two simple setae at the
extremity ; third joint longer than the second, nearly as long as the first, extremity
bearing simple setae and one auditory seta. The remaining portion of the antenna appears
to represent the flagellum ; it consists of one very short, iiidistiuct joint, followed by one
as long as the second joint of the peduncle ; this joint bears at its extremity a few simple
setae and about four or five "olfactory cylinders " ; it is followed by two or three very
minute joints, of which the first bears an " olfactory cylinder " and the last ends in a
small pencil of three very long simple setae.
The lotcer antennce (figs. 2, 4, 5) have the first joint very small, nearly rectan-
gular, broader than long ; this joint can be seen only when the antenna is viewed from
below, as in fig. 5 ; it is quite concealed in a view from above by the base of the
upiier antennae. The second joint is large and broad, considerably longer than the first
joint of the upper antennae, which rests on the top of it in an oblique groove ; it bears a
minute seta at the extremity on the inner side. The third joint is short, narrow at the
base, more or less geniculate with the first, and bears one or two minute setae at the
extremity on the inner side. The fourth joint is twice as long as the third; it bears
several long setae at the extremity and one or two small ones on the inner margin. The
fifth joint is rather longer than the fourth, but slightly nai'rower ; at the extremity it
bears several simple setae, some of them very long, and three " auditory setie." The
remaining part of the antenna may by analogy be considered as the flagellum ; it consists
of one joint about as long as the second joint of the peduncle, and at its extremity a
minute joint ending in a pencil of long setae.
Movth-parts. The mouth of Cruregens fontanus, like that of other Anthuridae, is
adapted for suction. It is situated near the anterior end of the head, and the various
parts project forwards and can usually be seen in a dorsal view between the bases of the
antennae. To form the sucking-apparatus the various parts are much modified, and
have coalesced to such an extent that I have found considerable difficulty in deter-
mining the homologies of all the parts. My difficulty has been increased by the want
of the necessary works of reference. Speuce Bate and Westwood give very little
information on the subject in their ' British Sessile-eyed Crustacea' [4]. JS^orman and
Stebbiug [106], in their account of the " Isopoda of the ' Lightning,' ' Porcupine,'
and 'Valorous' Expeditions," supply figures of the mouth-parts of some of the
Anthuridae, but, unfortunately, they give no description beyond the brief accounts
comprised in the generic diagnoses. I regret that I have not been able to consult
CEUSTACEA OF KEW ZEALAND. 2l;J
Schiodte's paper on the moutli-parts of Cyathura carinata referred to by Norman and
Stebbing *. I have consulted Dohrn's paper on Parcudhura costana [36] with much
benefit. Cruregeiis, however, diiTers from all other Anthuridae that I know in having
the mandibles entirely without palps, and the mouth-parts seem more specialized than
in other species.
The projecting tube formed by the mouth-parts is closed above by the upper Up
(fig. 6), which projects downward and forward from below the bases of the lower
antennae. It consists of a triangular plate with doubly-curving sides and an acute
extremity, which is chitinous throughout and seems veiy hard and .strong. The sides
of the tubes are enclosed by the greatly modified mandibles (fig. 7) and by the distal
portions of the much simplified maxillipedes, which also form the covering for the tube
below. The mandiljles, which show no sign whatever of a palp, appear more or less
completely ankylosed to the wall of the head and almost incapable of independent
movement. Fig. 8 is a view of them from l)elo\v and partly from the side, to show
how they are attached to the ends of the maxillipedes and form the covering on the sides
between them and the upper lip. The mandibles are subtriangular, running out to a
sharp point distally ; the distal portion bears on the inside a thin chitinous plate with
rounded margin, which is very thin and sharp, and perhaps acts as a lancet or cutting-
organ of some kind.
Within the tube of the mouth, enclosed as above described, we should expect to find a
lower lip and two pairs of maxilla;. Tig. 12 represents what I suppose to be the
lower lip ; it consists of an oblong plate narrowed at the base, with the distal extremity
truncate, the corners being rounded off and the extremity fringed with a few fine setae
directed forward. The margins ajopcar to be curled in or thickened, and the centre is
strengthened by a thickening w hich extends distally from the narrow base and gradually
thins out. The first viaxillce (figs. 9, 10) are easily recognized and are of the form
usual in this section of the Anthuridae ; they are very long, extending back at the base
nearly to the posterior end of the head ; each consists of a long, slightly curving, and
gradually tapering shaft, which bears at the extremity on the outside a fine saw-like
edge made up of a number of sharp teeth ; on the opposite side is a thin flange curving
out from the maxilla and having a very sharp razor-like edge. The maxilla is acutely
pointed at the extremity : at the base it is jointed on to a short chitinous piece, Avhich is
again jointed on to a curving transverse bar ; to the distal end of the first ^jiece is attached
the tendon of a strong muscle, by the contraction of which the maxilla is protruded, while
it is drawn back again by muscles attached to the base of the maxilla itself ; possibly
also the maxilla can be somewhat rotated on its base so as to bring the two saw-like
edges together. In any case they evidently form most efficient lancet-like organs. It
appears probable from Dohrn's figure [36, pi. ix. fig. 8] that at the base of the first
maxilla of Puranthura costana there is an apparatus similar to that here described, but
his' figure is not very clear and shows the transverse bar as though continuous with
the maxilla itself.
* •' Kiebsdyrenes Sugemund," Naturhistorisk Tids>krift 3 II. 10 B. (1875), p. 211, tab. iv.
28*
214 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEBEANEAN
I have not been able to make out the second maxillce quite satisfactorily, for they seem
to be closely connected at the base with the part I have considered the lower lip, and it
is difficult to separate the two without injuring them; the first maxillse are not connected
with these, simply working between them and being articulated to the head much
posteriorly. Usually the loAver liji and second maxilla come away together and then
present the appearance shown in fig. 11 ; this evidently corresponds to Dohrn's " fig. 9,"
which he calls the " Verwachsenes zweites Maxillenpaar (?) " ; but in the species he
describes the central portion (lower lip ?) is deeply cleft, while it is not so in Cruregens.
In this figure 11 the base of the second maxilla can be seen as a strongly curving bar
proceeding from a central portion that lies just along the base of the lower lip, and is
perhaps joined to it ; on each side this bar afterwards curves inward and ends in an
expanded distal portion bearing numerous fine setae. Tlie whole of this end is soft and
delicate ; it is difficult to make out its exact form, but it appears to widen out verti-
cally, and probably helps to close in the sides of the suctorial tube formed by the mouth
(see fig. 13).
The maxillipedes (fig. 14) have the basal portion completely aukylosed to the under-
side of the head ; about the middle there is a small and chitinous plate similar to that
figured by Dohrn in Paranthura costana and by Norman and Stebbing in Anthelura
elongata [106, pi. xxv. fig. 1, c, l]. In the latter species the corresponding plate is
slightly pointed at the extremity, and is situated nearer the posterior end of the head,
at the base of the maxillipedes. Hence it appears probable that this plate represents
the large chitinous plate found in Phreatoicus, the IdoteidtB, Asellidse, &c., and is
therefore the epipodite. In Cruregens, however, this plate is situated much further
from the posterior margin of the head, and the remainder of the maxillipede has been
so modified that all trace of its separate joints has been lost. Anteriorly from this the
two maxillipedes are contiguous for a short distance, but then rapidly separate, a seta
being placed in the middle of the inner concave margin. The extremity narrows nearly
to a point, and has at the end a very small terminal joint bearing a number of rather
long setcB, one or two others being situated on the outer edge at a little distance from
the extremity.
The^rs^ pair of legs (figs. 15, 16) forms powerful subchelate claws, which can be
extended considerably beyond the head and even beyond the ends of the antennae. The
coxa is indistinguishable and appears completely ankylosed to the body-segment. The
bases is narrow at the base and rapidly widens out to its greatest breadth at the middle,
where the breadth is rather more than one-third of the length ; it narrows again slightly
towards the distal end ; the j)Osterior margin is regularly arched, the anterior sinuous ;
near the base there are two rather long " auditory setae." The ischium is equal in length
to the basos and is similar in form ; the posterior margin is convex and bears four small
spinules ; the anterior side is hollowed out into a longitudinal groove to receive the rest
of the limb when bent back upon it. The mei'os is short, transverse; at its junction with
the ischium it is narrow, but it rapidly Avidens out, forming anteriorly an oval lobe, which
bears at the end a few small setae ; the posterior margin is straight, lies in the same
line as that of the ischium, and bears two setae at the extremity. The carpus is small, sub-
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 215
rectangular, and is surrounded by the propodos, except on the posterior side, where it is
produced at the extremity into a small rounded lobe bearing a few long setae and
covered with a thick fur of very short setae. The propodos is very large, about as long
as the three preceding joints together; it is subtriangular, widest towards the base, where
it is more than half as broad as long ; the anterior margin is very convex and bears
no setae except a small one at the base of the dactylos ; the posterior margin is straight
and is produced along the end of the carpus into a small x'ounded lobe ; all the rest forms
a rather broad palm, fringed throughout its whole length on the outside with a row of
serrated setae of fair length, one or two of these being considerably longer than the others,
and two or three long ones being situated at the extremity. The dactylos is as long as the
propodos, is considerably curved, and tapers gradually to the acute extremity ; the
inner margin bears about 15 minute spinules at regular distances ; the tip is brown in
colour, but is otherwise not clearly marked off into a distinct unguis.
When the limb is seen from the inner side (fig. III. p) only a triangular portion of the
carpus is seen, the rest being overlapped by the propodos. The inner margin of the palm
appears slightly convex and is fringed with a thick row of setae, which appear simple
and are much more numerous than those in the row^ on the outer mai-crin. At the base
this row leaves the margin of the propodos, and curves along the side, thus marking the
place where the tip of the dactylos overlaps the propodos.
The second pair of legs (figs. 17, 18) is slender and subchelate. The basos is longer
than the ischium, narrow at the base, Avidening distally, greatest breadth rather more than
one-fifth the length ; two " auditory setae " near the base as in the first pair of legs, both
mai'gins with a few small spinules. The ischium is similar in shape to the basos, widest
at the middle, where the breadth is about one-fourth the length, narrowing toward both
ends, a few spinules on each margin. The meros is triangular, very narrow at the base ;
posterior margin straight, with two or three long setae at the extremity ; antero-distal angle
produced and tipped with two setae. • The carpus is small, with three setie at the extremity
of the posterior margin ; the junction with the propodos oblique. The propodos is narrow
ovate, as long as the ischium, length about two and a half times the greatest breadth ;
anterior margin convex, with a few small setae, and at the base of the dactylos a small
group of two longer ones and an " auditory seta " ; the palm occupying about two-thirds
the posterior margin, not clearly defined, slightly convex, armed with about eight stout
setae, each bearing a subapical hair and being serrate on the opposite side ; besides these
there are also a few simple setie. The dactylos is slightly curved, fitting closely on to
the palm ; inner margin wdth a few minute spinules, and towards the end one or tw3 small
setae marking off the terminal unguis.
The thii'cl pair of legs is similar to the second in size and form.
The fourth pair of legs (fig. 19) is about as long as the third, but they are simple and
not subchelate. The basos and ischium are similar to those of the second and third
pairs, but the basos is a little more widened in the centre and bears three " auditory
setae." The meros is rather more than half as long as the ischium, triangular, narrow at
the base ; anterior margin straight, with a seta about the middle and two longer ones at
the extremity ; posterior margin slightly convex, somewhat produced distally, and hearing
216 r>K. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
at the end three or four setse. The carpus is rather longer than the mcros, ohlong; the
anterior margin with three spiniform setse and two or three simple setae at tlie end ; the
posterior margin straight, with a few simple setse, and in the middle a long " auditory
seta." The propodos is similar to the carpus, hut considerahly longer ; the anterior
margin armed with four or iive spiniform setse and a few simple ones, the posterior
margin having at the extremity a group of two or three simple setse and one " auditory
seta." The dactylos is similar to that of the third pair of legs. The spiniform setse on
the anterior margins of the carpus and propodos are similar to those on the palms of the
second and third pairs of legs, but are smaller and not quite so well marked.
The fifth and sixth pairs of legs are similar to the fourth, but may sometimes be
a little longer.
The seventh pair of legs is entirely absent in all the specimens that I have
examined.
The first pleopoda (fig. 21) form an operculum completely closing in the branchial
plates below. The protopodite appears to consist of two joints, a very short coxa, and a
rectangular basos, which is broader than long, and bears on the inner margin three stout
sette, dentate at the extremity ; these aj)pear to act like tlie " coupling-spines " to which
Stebbiug has drawn special attention in the Amj)hij)oda. The exopodite which forms
the operculum is an oval plate bulging downward ; it is about twice as long as broad, its
inner margin nearly straight, outer margin very convex, bearing on the distal half about
six very delicate plumose setse, with three or four shorter ones at the extremity. The
endopodite is narrow styliform, slightly enlarged at the base, somewhat sinuous, sides
parallel, extremity rounded and tipped with three or four plumose setse.
The second, third, fourth, and fifth pleopoda (fig. 22) are all alike and of the usual
form. Each consists of a short transverse j)rotopodite, an oval endopodite well rounded
at the end and with the margins free from setse, and a longer and rather narrower
expedite, which is slightly constricted on the outer margin toward the extremity ; the
margin is rather irregular, and bears a few finely plumose setse on the inner side and at
the end, with sometimes one on tlie outer side. The number of these setse appears to
vary somewhat in the different pleopoda, but 1 have not noticed any other differences
between them.
I have not hitherto met with any special modification of the pleopoda of the male
like that occurring iu the Asellidse, ^'^c, and do not know whether such a peculiarity
has been recorded in the Anthuridoe.
The iiropoda (fig. 23) are articulated to the end of the sixth segment of the pleon.
The basal portion or peduncle is large, fiat, and nearly rectangular, and reaches nearly to
the end of the telson ; it is about two and a half times as long as broad ; the outer margin
is straight and bears a few setse on the distal half; the inner portion extends as a fiat plate
to the median line of the body, the right or the left uropods often having their inner
margins in contact below the telson ; the inner distal angle bears a single small seta.
The endopodite is articulated to the posterior margin of the peduncle on its outer half ; it
is oblong, more than three times as long as broad, extremity rounded, the end and the two
margins being fringed with long setse, which are thickest and longest at the extremity ;
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 217
these setas appear to be simple, but among them are two small groups, each containing
two " auditory setae." The expodite is articulated to the dorsal and outer surface of the
peduncle near its anterior end : it is slender, and consists of a thin rod or narrow plate,
a little deeper than broad, and shows no tendency to enclose the hinder end of the pleon
as in Anthura, &c. ; it reaches slightly beyond the extremity of the peduncle, and has
its upper and lower margins and the extremity fringed with setae, those at the end being
the longest.
The fclson (see fig. 20) is sliglitly longer than all the preceding part of the pleon ;
it is squamiform, rather more than half as broad as long, the distal portion ovate, the
extremity tipped with five or six small setae.
The telson is distinctly separated from the sixth segment of the pleon, a very unusual
feature in the Isopoda, which generally have the sixth segment of the pleon and the
telson confluent ; this character is, in fact, so constant that it is given by Blanc [12] as
one of the points of difference between the Isopoda and the Aniphipoda. Most authors
have drawn the telson of Anthnra and other species as separate from the sixth
segment of the pleon, but I am not aware that anyone has drawn special attention to
this unusual character.
It will be seen that I have described the uropoda as consisting of a peduncle and two
branches, each consisting of a single joint, whilst most authors have described the inner
brancli as (;?oo-jointed, considering the part I have taken as the flagellum to be the first
joint of the endopodite. If the eudopodite were really two-jointed it would be an excep-
tion from all other Isoi)ods. It may consist of several joints in the Tanaidae and the Apseu-
didse, which differ in several well-marked features from the Isopods, but in all others, so
far as my knowledge goes, the endopodite never consists of more than a single joint.
The interpretation of the uropod that I have given is certainly correct for Cruregens, for
in this genus the exopodite can be plainly seen to be articulated to the dorsal side of the
peduncle, and the peduncle is quite continuous past the base of the exopodite to its
junction with the sixth segment of the pleon ; this can be seen both al)ove and still
more easily below. In most other species of the Anthuridae the exopodite is broad and
its articulation extends right across the peduncle, thus concealing its true nature.
Gerstaecker [dS, pi. xiv. fig. 26] certainly figures the uropod of Paranthura costana, Sp.
Bate, with a short separate peduncle bearing two branches, one of which is ^<(JO-jointed ;
but his figure is not very clear, and I think he has probably been misled in the way
suggested above. Dohrn [36], dealing with the same species, interprets the uropod in
the same way that I have done, and as I had formed my own conclusion before con-
sulting Dohrn's paper, I was particularly pleased to find my opinion confirmed by him.
This portion of his paper appears to have been overlooked by systematic writers on the
Anthuridae. The great enlargement and elongation of the peduncle in Cruregens,
Anthuria, &c., are only exaggerations of what we find in most of the Oniscidte, where
the two rami are widely separated ; and in Hz/ssiira, Norman and Stebbing [106, i^p. 128,
129, pi. XXV. fig. v.), we have evidently an intermediate form where the peduncle is
quite short and the two rami therefore much more closely approximated at their bases.
Even in tliis genus, however, Stebbing and Norman speak of the endopodite as iico-
218 DE. C. C'HILTOX ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
jointed, tliougli according to their figure their " first joint " of the endopodite is quite
continuous with the true ^^eduncle and evidently a part of it.
Gerstaecker considers the hranch I have described as the exopocUte to be the endopodite
or inner branch ; and in this he may perhaps be right, though without an appeal to embry-
ology there seems to me little to help us to decide which is the exoiwdite and which the
endopodite, and I have therefore followed the majority of authoi's. In Hyssura as
figured by Stebbing the shorter branch certainly appears to be the endopodite ; but this
may be apparent only, and due to the fact that in the figure the animal is " viewed dorso-
lateraDy " [106, pi. xxv. fig. v. P/.].
AMPHIPODA.
Genus Ckangonyx, Spence Bate.
(British Sessile-eyed Crustacea, vol. i. p. 326.)
The following is the definition given by Spence Bate when establishing this genus : —
" Superior antennae having a secondary appendage. First pair of gnathopoda rather
larger than the second. Posterior pair of pleopoda unibranched, not longer than the
preceding pair. Telson single, entire."
In his subsequent explanation he gives tlie additional information that the eyes are
imperfectly developed, that the superior antennae are not much longer than the inferior,
but rather more robust, and that tlie first two pairs of legs are small, rather unequal in
size, and subchelate.
Numerous species belonging to this genus have been described by Pacivard, O. P. Hay,
S. I. Smith, Grube, &c., but, so far as I am aware, no one has revised the characters of
the genus, although it is evident that this must be done before it can be made to suit all
the species that have been assigned to it. The genus Stygobromus, Cope [30], is con-
sidered by S. I. Smith [104] to be equivalent to Craiigonyx ; but Cope's description is
very imperfect, and does not in any way add to our knowledge of the genus. Wrzesni-
owski points out that no description of the mouth-parts of Grangonyx is known to liim
[124, p. 635]. I am able to give below some account of the mouth-parts of Grangonyx
compactus ; and from this it will be seen that in the mouth-parts the genus approaches
very closely to Niphargus, which it resembles also in many other points, such as in the
antenna?, the guatlio^wda, and the uropoda. Although Spence Bate described the
terminal pair of uropoda as 2</«branched, the inner ramus is really present in G. gracilis
and C. cotnpactus, and probably in others, though it is rudimentary as in Niphargus.
It appears, however, that there is a great amount of variation in the development of the
terminal urojaoda in difi'ereut species ; this has been pointed out by O. P. Hay, who
shows the transition in three species as follows : —
C. gracilis has the outer ramus of the third uropoda twice as long as the peduncle,
the inner ramus present, but rudimentary.
G. Ufurcus has the outer ramus of the third uropoda two-thirds the length of the
peduncle, while it is doubtful whether there is anything to represent the inner
ramus.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 219
C. Iticifitgiis has both rami absent and the iieduncle itself reduced [56, pp. 143-
U6].
This varialjility of the third uropoda is only what \\c might have expected from the
affinity of the genus to Niphargus, where the third uropoda are also very variable,
diflfering iu length in the two sexes, and often being greatly elongated. Although
Crmujomjx evidently comes very close to Niphargus, it appears to be a good genus, and
to differ constantly from Niphargus in the more robust body and in the telson, which is
always entire and never cleft as in Nip)hargus. This diflfercnce in the telson is very
striking, and is somewhat remarkable, as it appears to give us some insight to the
direction that the development of the telson has taken in this group ; for if we are to
look upon Gammariis as representing one of the older types among the Amphipoda, as
suggested by Stebbing [108, p. xvi], from which Niphargus and Crangoniix have
successively developed, then it is evident that the development must have bci^n fi-om the
double telson of Gammarus to the deeply-cleft telson of Ni2)harg us, and then '.to the
single entire telson of Crangonyx. Considerations such as these naturally give rise to
the questions : — What is the use of the telson ? and why is it double in some species,
deeply cleft in others, and entire in others again ? But in propounding such questions
we only draw attention to our ignorance, and a much more complete knowledge of the
habits of these animals must be gained before we can hope to give any solution. In
Crangonyx mucronatus, Forbes, which Packard leaves in the genus Crangonyx, though
the species is, he says, perhaps entitled to rank as the type of a new genus, there appears
to be a great difference between the male and the female in the development of the
telson. Eorbes thus describes the two: —
".The telson of the male is a smooth cylindrical appendage, usually abou.t as long as
the first three abdominal segments, and as large as the last joint of the pedicel of the
lower antenna. It presents a very slight double curve, is obliquely rounded at the end,
and tipped by a cluster of short hairs. In some cases this appendage is half as long as
the body In the female this (the telson) is very similar to the telson of
C. gracilis, Smith. It is flattened and slightly emarginate, a little longer than broad,
extending to the tips of the second pair of anal legs, and bears two terminal clusters of
spines of four or five each." Quoted from Packard [83, pp. 37, 38].
I am not aware of any other sjiecies of Niphargus or Crangonyx in which there is a
difference between the sexes in the telson, and a cylindrical telson half as long as the
animal is so remarkable that I was at first almost inclined to suspect some mistake ; but
specimens lately received from Mr. W. P. Hay, of Irvington, Indiana, agree in all
respects with Mr. Forbes's description ; but, as he points out, there can be little doubt
that the species should form the type of a separate genus distinct from Crangonyx.
The species that I have to describe, Crangonyx compactus, is remarkable in that the
three pairs of pleopoda have each only one branch instead of two, as in almost all Amphi-
poda, the inner branch being apparently the one that is absent. These examples are
sufficient to show how imperfect our knowledge of the Amphipoda still is, and what
startling variations may be found when least expected.
It would be interesting to know whether the other species of Crangonyx agree with
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 29
220 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
C. compachis in the possession of 6/H^/e-branclied joleopoda, or wlietlier tliey have normal
pleopoda with two branches *. Unfortunately, the pleopoda are usually neglected in the
brief descriptions given of new species, and are seldom referred to even in more elaborate
descriptions; this is, of course, due to the fact that the pleopoda are less suliject to
variation than most organs of the Amphipoda. To such a degree is this the case that
Fritz Mliller speaks of them as being " reproduced in wearisome uniformity throughout
the entire order " [70, p. 15, footnote]. Stebbing [108, p. 350] has, however, pointed
out that this statement is somewhat overdrawn, and has perhaps had the disadvantageous
tendency of discouraging the examination of these organs.
Wrzesniowski [121, p. 634] remarks that there is much variation in the degree of
development of the eyes in the different species of Crangomjx, some being described
as without eyes, others having more or less perfectly developed eyes. I had originally
stated that I could find no eyes in Crangomjx compactus ; I find, however, that they are
represented by two or three small lenses, which, however, do not appear to be furnished
with any pigment, and are probably useless so far as sight is concerned.
As I have examined only the one species belonging to the genus, and as the
descriptions of other species to wliich I have access do not give much information on
the details of their structure, I have not attempted to revise the characters of the genus,
but must leave that for some one with a wider knowledge of the sul)ject. It will be
sufficient for the j)resent to repeat that the genus appears to differ from Nipliargus in the
more robust body, in the last pair of uropoda, and in the single uncleft telson.
Crangonyx compactds, Chilton. (PI. XX. figs. 1-30.)
Crangomjx compactus, Chilton, New Zealand Journal of Science, vol. i. (Marcli 1882) -p. 14«; id.
Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xiv. p. 177, plate x. figs. 13 to 19; Thomson & Chilton,
Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xviii. p. 147; Moniez, "Fauna des Eaux souterraines du
Departement du Nord fee.,'" cxtrait de la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France, tome i. (1888-
1889) p. 50 ; Wrzesniowski, ' O trzcch kielzach podziemnych,'' De tribus Crustaceis Amphipodis subter-
raneis, pp. 16, 41, 90; Wrzesniowski, " Ueber drei nnterirdische Gammariden," Zeitschrift fiir wisseu-
schaftliche Zoologie, L. 4, pp. 611, 634, 698.
Specific diagnosis. Eyes small, without pigment, consisting of two or three imperfect
lenses only. Upper antennaj about one-third the length of the body ; first joint of
peduncle much larger than the second ; flagellum longer than the peduncle ; secondary
appendage small and slender, consisting of one long and one short joint. Peduncle
of lower antennae longer than peduncle of upper ; flagellum shorter than the last joint
of peduncle, consisting of four joints. Gnathopoda sul)equal, propodos of each only
slightly broader than the carpus ; palm about one-half the length of the inferior edge,
defined by a stout spine on each side. Perseopoda subequal, the last three pairs having
the basi narrow, not exjianded as usual. Inferior edge of the three anterior segments of
the pleon furnished with five or six small setse. The three pairs of pleopoda one-
branched. The uro^ioda short and broad, the third pair with the outer branch about
* lu both C. gracilis. Smith, and C. mtici-onatus, Forbes, specimens of which have recently been sent to me by
Mr. W. P. Hay, the iJeopoda have the normal two branches.
CET7STACEA OF XEW ZEALAND. 221
three times as long as the peduncle, the inner branch rudimentary. Telson about half
as long as the terminal uropoda, narrowing slightly towards the extremity, which bears
two stout setfB.
Colour. White, semi-transparent.
Length. About 8 mm.
Sabitat. Eyreton {Chilton) and Leeston {R. 11. Laing); Canterbury (in wells).
Bemarks. Moniez says [78, p. 50] that this species differs little from Crangonyx
subterraneus, Spence Bate. Bate's description of that species is, however, not sufficiently
detailed to allow of a comparison of any value between the two.
Detailed Descrijition.
Bochj (PL XX. fig. 1.). The body is rather stout and deep, especially in the pleon.
The side-plates {co.xcb) are about half as deep as their respective segments, and are all
nearly equal in size. The head is as long as the first segment of the perseon ; segments
of perteon subequal, the posterior ones a little longer than those preceding them. First
three segments of the pleon subequal, a little longer than the last segment of the peraeon,
about twice as deep as long; inferior margin of each segment slightly convex and
furnished with four or five setnc, arranged chiefly toAvards the anterior end ; last three
segments of the pleon very short.
Eyes rudimentary, represented by two or three imperfect lenses without pigment.
Tlpxier antennm (figs. 2 & 3) considerably longer than the lower, about one-third
the length of the body ; peduncle slightly shorter than the flagellum ; first joint nearly
as long as the second and third together, upper margin straight and furnished with a
few minute spinules, lower surface grooved, bearing on the inner margin three stout
setae, the third being at the distal end, the outer margin without setge, winged, produced
downwards at the base, where it is slightly convex ; the second joint half as long again
as the third, a few fine setne on both upper and lower margins, those at the extremity
being longest and most numerous ; third joint similar to the second except in size.
Secondary appendage small, reaching to about the end of the second joint of the main
flagellum, consisting of two joints, the first as long as the first joint of tlie flagellum but
very slender, bearing ordinary sette ; the second small, bearing ordinary set;e and a minute
olfactory cylinder at the extremity. Flagellum consisting of about thirteen joints, those
at the base nearly as broad as long, the others becoming more and more slender, each
joint from the second onwards bearing on the loAver side of the distal extremity two
olfactory cylinders nearly as long as the succeeding joint, and two small tufts of ordinary
setse, one above, the other below.
Loicer antennce (fig. 4) having the first two joints very short, the gland-cone
arising from the second joint being very long and reaching nearly to the end of the
lower margin of the third joint ; third joint subquadrangular, with two stout setae in
the middle of the upper margin and one long simple seta at the extremity of the lower
margin; fourth joint only half as broad as tlie third, upper margin bearing a stout seta
near the base, foUowed by two or three slender setae, lo\\ er margin with thi'ee oblique
29*
222 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
rows of setoe, each containing four or five, tbe lateral surface of the joint also hearing
two or three small tufts of seta?; the fifth joint is as long as the fourth, but rather more
slendei", armed with setae in a similar way to the fourth, but with more numerous tufts ;
the flagellum shorter than the fifth joint, consisting of five joints, of which the first is
the longest ; the articulations between the joints are oblique, and each bears at the
extremity a row of four or five small setae, and there is another row of four or five rather
longer seta? on the lower margin towards the extremity.
The tipper lip (fig. 5) is rather delicate, broader than long, the extremity very slightly
emarginate and somewhat sparingly sujoplied with the usual incurving seta?.
The mandibles (figs. 6, 7, 8, 9) closely resemble in general shape those of Niphargus,
as described by Humbert and other authors. The palp is rather large in proportion
to the mandible itself ; it lias the first joint small, the margins without seta? ; the second
joint rather broad, especially in the middle, where it is strongly curved, the convex
margin bearing about six or seven long setae, which project almost at right angles to the
joint; the third joint about as long as the second, outer margin nearly straight and
without setae, inner margin bearing on the distal half a double row of long setae, Avhich
increase in length towards the distal end. The palp is the same in both mandibles.
The outer cutting-edge is practically the same in botli mandibles, and consists of five
teeth, the two largest of which are somewhat widely separated, the other three teeth are
smaller and subequal. In the right mandible (fig. 6) the secondary cutting-edge is very
similar to that of Nip>hargns puteanus, figured by Humbert, and resembles in shape an
open hand with the fingers close together ; the part corresponding to the thumb is denti-
culated throughout, while that corresponding to the fingers has the distal extremity
oblique and finely serrate. At the base of this secondary cutting-edge are two stout
spiniform setae denticulated similarly to the thumb, and following these is a stout plumose
seta (see fig. 7).
The secondary cutting-edge of the right mandible usually has the form just described,
but it is evidently sul)ject to some variation, for in one specimen, which otherwise
appeared quite normal, it had the form rejiresented in fig. 8, which, it wdll be seen,
is very different from the usual form. Whether this was the result of accident or not I
cannot say, but it shows how careful one ought to be before laying much stress on the
form of tliese minute mouth-parts unless they are found to be constant by the examina-
tion of a large number of specimens.
In the left mandible (fig. 9) the secondary cutting-edge resembles the outer cutting-
edge, and consists like it of five separate teeth ; at its base are stout denticulated setae
similar to those in the left mandible. It will be seen that this figure is inverted.
The molar tubercle, which appears to be the same in both mandibles, is small and
presents no remarkable feature.
The lower lip (fig. 10) is very delicate, broad ; extremity of each outer lobe very
broadly rounded and covered with fine seta? ; inner lobes small and very delicate ; the
lateral backAvard processes are short and rather ol)tuse.
Thej^rs^ maxilla (figs. 11, 12, 13) is very similar to that of Niphargus puteanus. The
palp has the first joint short, its extremity oblique; the second joint slightly narrowing
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 223
towards the extremity, whicli bears three stout setfe at the end and one more slender
placed a slight distance from the end ; the three stout setae are finely serrate at the
ends (fig. 13). The middle lobe of the maxilla is broad, nearly as broad as long, the
extremity slightly oblique, bearing seven stout spiniform setup, of which the innermost
one is the largest and is a little separated from the others ; it is serrate on the inner
margin towards the extremity, on the surface of the lobe at its base are several fine
hairs ; the seta next to it is only about half as long and bears one strong tooth on the
inner margin, the remaining sette bear one or more deuticulations or serrations, as shown
in fig. 12. Tlie inner lobe is small and delicate ; its extremity is rounded and bears one
or two finely plumose setae.
A few very fine hairs are scattered over the surface of the whole maxilla. The
extremity of the palp appears to be the same both in tlie right and left mandibles, and
does not take different forms as in some species of Ganimarus.
Tlie second mcLiilla (figs. 11 & 15) is very similar to that of N/p7iarffi's. Its oiiter
lobe is slightly longer and broader than the inner, and bears at the extremity a great
number of slightly curved seta; ; the inner lobe bears about six large setae, the innermost
one of which is much the largest, and is situated a little distance from the extremity on
the inner margin, the basal j^oi'tion of it is s]iaringly plumose, and its extremity is
plumose or almost dentate on one side. Some of the remaining setas are similar to this
one, but others appear to want the plumes at the end (fig. 15).
A few fine liairs are sparingly scattered over the whole surface of the maxilla.
The maxlllipedes (figs. 16, 17, 18) do not present any remarkable feature. The lobe
. attached to the basos ("inner lobe ") is rectangular, the extremity truncate and bearing
about four stout setae much curved inwards ; there are two fine setae on the inner
margin and a few fine hairs on the surface towards the outer margin (fig. 17) ; the
lobe attached to the ischium reaches nearly as far as the extremity of the outer margin
of the next joint, the meros, its inner margin is neaidy straight and bears about ten to
twelve setae, of which two near the extremity are pretty stout, the others being rather
slender ; besides these spiniform setae there are a few finer setae or hairs along the inner
margin (fig. IS).
When seen from below, the basos bears no setae on its outer margin, but there are three
at the extremity near the inner angle ; there are three or four setae on the inner margin
of the ischium and one at the extremity of the inner margin of the meros ; the last-
mentioned two joints have no setse on their outer margins. The carpus has the outer
margin much curved, with a single seta at the extremity, its inner margin is curved and
thickly fringed with long setae; on the upper surface of this joint there is a distinct row
of six seta? running parallel to the inner margin near the extremity. The propodos has
the outer margin very convex, and produced on the upper surface into a small lobe at
the base of the dactylos; on the upper surface (fig. 17) towards the end of the joint
is a dense mass of long setae, arranged chiefly in three longitudinal rows ; the inner
margin has the basal portion free from setae, but the distal half thickly fringed with long
setae ; on the under surface of the jiropodos there are two or three long setae at the base
of the dactylos. The dactylos is as long as the propodos, and is very acutely pointed; on
224 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
the outer margin near the base it bears a single seta; its extremity is marked off into a
distinct unguis, at the base of which is a small seta on the inner margin.
First gvathopod (fig. 20). The coxa (side-plate) is almost rectangular, sloping a little
forward, its anterior edge bearing five or six short setse. The basos is narrow at the base,
but rapidly widens until it is quite half as broad as long ; its anterior edge is nearly
straight and bears a tuft of five long setse near the base and a single seta at the extremity ;
the posterior margin is very convex and bears four or five setae, the longest being at the
extremity. The ischium is short, broader than long, and bears five or six setae at
the extremity of the posterior margin. The meros is rounded distally, and has the
whole extremity thickly fringed with long, rather stout setse. The carpus is triangular,
extremity nearly straight, with a row of long setse running parallel to it along the
posterior half of the inner surface; the short posterior margin densely covered with
setae, apparently arranged in three or four transverse rows. The propodos is ovate, about
as long as the three preceding joints together, scarcely wider than the carpus ; anterior
margin convex, with four or five setae separately situated along the inner surface near
it and a small tuft at the base of the dactylos ; posterior margin with numerous setae
partially arranged in five or six tufts ; palm oblique, occupying rather more than half
the posterior margin, defined by two stout spines and fringed with numerous short
setae, a few longer setae being situated on the surface of the propodos near the palm.
The dactylos is slightly curved, fitting closely on to the palm ; the terminal uuguis
distinct and marked ofi^ by a small tooth on the inner margin at its base ; on the outer
margin the dactylos bears a plumose seta at a little distance from the base.
The second gnatliopod (fig. 21) is aboitt as large as the first and closely resembles it
in form. The coxa is similar but someAvhat larger, the basos sli^'htlv lona-er in
proportion to its breadth. The carpus much longer than in the first gnathopod, with
more numerous tufts of setae on its posterior margin and a shorter row along the
extremity. The propodos is like that of the first gnathopod, but the palm does not
occupy so much of the posterior margin, and there is a larger number of tufts of setae
between the end of the pabn and the base of the posterior margin.
In both gnathopoda the outer surface bears fewer setae than the inner.
The first pera'opod (fig. 22) has the coxa like that of the second gnathopod. The
basos is longer, and widens considerably about the middle, where the breadth is rather
more than one-third the length ; it is much constricted on both sides near the base, and
after widening narrows again slightly at the extremity ; the anterior margin bears a
few small setae, and the posterior margin bears six stout setae, each situated in a slight
serration. The ischium is similar to that of tlie second gnathopod. The meros is
slightly longer than the carpus, and is a little produced at the antero-distal angle ; the
anterior margin slightly convex, and bearing one spiniform seta at the centre and
another at the extremity ; posterior margin straight, with a few long setae, the longest
two being at the extremity. The carpus is oblong, narrowed at the base; anterior
margin with one or two minute spinules ; posterior margin straight, with five stout
setse. The propodos is shorter and narrower than the carpus but of similar shape ;
posterior margin with a row of six or seven short setse, the last being the longest;
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 225
anterior marp;in with a small tuft at the base of the dactylos aud a single seta situated
more proximally. The dactylos is short.
The second perccopod is exactly similar to the first in size and form.
The third, fn)irtli, and fifth pera^opoda are all similar to each other, but eacli is
slightly larger than the preceding ; they are all somewhat remarkable in having the
basos rather narrow and not expanded posteriorly into a semicircular plate as in most
Amphipoda. Eig. 23 represents the fourtli peraeopod, and it will be convenient to
take this one for description, as it represents a mean between the fifth and seventh.
The coxa is almost semicircular, upper margin straight, the lower convex margin
thickly fringed with short spines, which are most numerous posteriorly. Tlie basos
is narrowed a little at the base ; it is oblong, the breadth being slightly more than
one-third the length ; anterior margin Avitli two setae, one at the extremity and one
above it; posterior margin straight, with two or three stout setoe about the middle
and one or two longer ones at the extremity. The ischium is very similar to that
of the preceding perseopoda ; the meros oblong, about three times as long as broad,
both margins bearing stout setae, especially at the extremity ; the carpus slightly
lons^er than tlie meros, but a little narrower, the seta? on it more numerous and lar^-er
than in the meros; the propodos as long as the carpus, but narrower, aj)parently
twisted so that the dactylos projects backwards, both margins having stout sette or spines,
those on the posterior margin being most numerous ; the dactylos is short, not much
longer than the setae at the end of the propodos.
The pleopoda (figs. 24, 25, 26) are small and are very remarkable, in that each bears
only one branch, which appears to be the outer one, there being no trace whatever of
the second branch. I do not know of any other species of the Amphipoda where this
is the case : in the CempUicB the inner branches may be rudimentary and even entirely
absent in the case of the third pleopod ; but it is easy to see that this is due to the
habit of the animal living in a tube, which has to some extent modified all its
pleopoda aud the tail-part. In the present species the portions of the pleopoda that
are present appear quite perfect, and I know of nothing in the habits of the animal
to explain why these pleopoda should have only one branch while those of Gammarus
fragilis and Calliopius subterraneus have the normal two branches.
The first pleopjod (fig. 24) is the longest ; the basal portion is oblong, slender,
without setae, except the two " coupling spines " at the extremity of the inner marf^in •
these seem not unlike those of Niphargus, each bearing two or three tubercles on the
one side and being slightly hooked at the end. The single branch is nearly twuce as
long as the peduncle and consists of eleven joints, each bearing the two long plumose
setae in the usual way. I cannot find any trace of the " cleft spines " mentioned by
Stcbbing [108, p. xiv &c.], Sars [91, p. 53J, Humbert [62, p. 351], &c., on the inner
margin of the first joint of this branch, and it is therefore probable that it represents the
outer branch, the inner one being absent.
Stebbing [108, p. xiv] has drawn special attention to these " cleft-spines " and also
to the "coupling-spines," and, with regard to the latter, points out that they have been
described aud figured by Sars in his account of Gammarus neglectiis [91, p. 53], and
226 DE. C. CHILTON OX THE SUBTEEEANEAN
indicated by S. I. Smith in his figure of Cerapus tuhularis, bnt not, he thinks, alluded
to by any other writers. It is but just to Humbert to mention that he had drawn and
described the "coupling-spines" ("deux petits crochets") oi Niphargus puieanus, Yar.
Forelii, in 1876 [62, p. 350].
The second pleopod (fig. 25) has the peduncle considerably longer and broader than
in the first, the basal part of it being pretty distinctly marked off as a separate joint,
probably representing the coxa. The outer margin bears four small spines on the distal
half, the inner margin having only the coupling-spines at the extremity. The branch
is only as long as the peduncle and contains only six joints, of which the first is much
the largest.
The third pleopod (fig. 26) is similar to the second, but smaller and more reduced;
the peduncle is similar, but narrowed at the base ; the branch is not so long as the
j^eduncle, and consists of three joints only, the first being much larger than the other
two together.
The tirojwda are all short and rather stout. The first uropod (fig. 27) has the
peduncle much longer than the rami, stout, broad above, the upper surface being
somewhat concave, its outer margin bearing seven small spines ; the outer ramus is
slightly smaller than the inner, both falciform, curving upwards, the lower surface of
each regularly curved and with seta?, the upper surface with three or four small spines
near the base and one near the apex.
The second uropod (fig. 28) is similar to the first, but shorter and bearing fewer setae.
The third uropod (fig. 29) has the peduncle short, witli two spines on the lower
margin at the extremity ; the inner ramus very small, rudimentary, with a small spine
at the end ; outer ramus about three times as long as the peduncle, gradually tapering,
the upper margin with eight seta? arranged in four jiairs in a longitudinal row, the
extremity separated from the other portion and forming a small second joint.
The telson (fig. 30) reaches about halfway to the end of the last uropod. It is
more or less oblong, narrowing slightly towards the end, which bears a stout spine in
a slight emargination at each corner ; the sides are slightly convex and the extremity
between the two spines is either straight or slightly concave. There is no sign whatever
of any cleft or division.
Genus Gammakus, Fabricius, 1775.
(See Stebbing's Report on the 'Challenger^ Ampbipoda, p. 1005.)
Full information on this very old genus will be found in Stebbing's Keport as quoted
above. In it he quotes the following generic diagnosis as having been given by Boeck
in 1876 :—
" Mandibles with the third joint of the palpi elongate, narrow.
" First maxilla; with the inner plate broad, long, furnished on the inner margin with
very many plumose seta?.
" The body not carinate. The three hinder segments of the pleon furnished in the
middle with fascicles of spines. The anterior side-plates of moderate size.
CEFSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 227
" Upper antemicB longer than the lower ; the peduncle moderately elongate.
" Loiver antennce with a short flagellum.
" First and second gnathopods with the hand smaU ; the second larger than the
first.
" The third uropods with long rami, furnished on the margin witli spines and plumose
setae, extending beyond the rami of the two preceding pairs ; the inner ramus more or
less shorter than the outer.
" Telson long, cleft to the base."
This definition answers very well to include Gammarus fragilis, which is the only
species of the genus that I have had an ojijiortunity of closely examining.
Gammarus fragilis, Chilton. (PI. XXI. figs. 1-25.)
Gammarus fragilis, Chilton, New Zealand Journal of Science, vol. i. (January 1882) p. 14 ; id.
Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xiv. p. 179, plate ix. figs. 11 to 18; id. New Zealand
Joui'nal of Science, vol. ii. (March 1884j p. 89 ; Thomson & Chilton, Transactions New Zealand
Institute, vol. xviii. p. 146; Moniez, " Faune des Eaux souterraines du Departemeut du Nord &c.,"
extrait de la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France, tome i. (1888-89) p. 50; Wrzesniowski, "O
trzech kielzaeh podziemnych," De tribus Crustaceis Amphipodis subterraneis, pp. 16, 90 ; id. " Ueber
drei unterirdische Gammariden," Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, L. 4, pp. 611, 698.
Specific diagnosis. Eyes wanting. Body rather slender. Superior antenna? somewhat
longer than the body ; flagellum much longer than peduncle, secondary containing from
five to nine joints. Peduncle of lower antennae longer than peduncle of upjier ; flagellum
longer than peduncle. Gnathopoda subequal, moderately large, each with the propodos
ovate ; palm very oblique. Pirst and second perseopoda rather short, slender ; last three
pairs of peroeopoda very long, the last (fifth) about as long as the body. Terminal
uropoda with the rami subequal, about twice as long as the peduncle, cylindrical, not
flattened or expanded.
Colour. White, semi-transparent.
Length of largest specimen 15 mm.
Habitat. Eyreton, Xorth Canterbury {Chilton), Leeston (B. M. Laing), Winchester,
South Canterbury (D. L. Inivood) : in wells.
Remarks. It will be seen from the following detailed description that this species is
a true Gammarus, and that in all generic characters it agrees very closely with
Gammarus neglectus as described by Sars. I have not attempted to compare G. fragilis
with the numerous other species of the genus already described. It appears to be well
characterized by the very long peraeopoda. the want of eves, and the long cylindrical
rami of the terminal uropoda.
• Detailed Description.
The hodtj (PI, XXI. fig. 1) is smooth, rather slender ; the appendages are also very long
and somewhat slender. The coxae (side-plates) of the first four segments of the peraeon
are rather deep, though not so deep as their respective segments. The segments of the
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 30
/
228 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
perreon are all of about the same length and as long as the head ; the first three segments
of the pleon are rather longer, then' inferior margins bear two or three stout setae towards
the anterior end ; the fourth segment of the pleon has a strong spine on the inferior
margin at the base of the uropod, and each of the last three segments bears four or five
long spine-like setae on the dorsal surface.
The upper antemice (fig. 2) appear to vary somewhat in length as compared with
the body, but they are always very long, usually about as long as the body. The first
joint of the podvmcle is stout, rather more than twice as long as broad ; the upper margin
is straight, with a tuft of fine seta? at the extremity ; lower margin slightly curved and
bearing two short transverse rows of spiniform setae, the second row being situated at
the extremity. Second joint about as long as the first, but only about half the width ;
upper margin with three or four fine setae ; lower margin with three or four tufts each
containing a spiniform seta and one or more fine hairs, at the extremity there are tufts
above and below and in the centre. Thii'd joint about one-third as long as the second, a
few setae above and below at the extremity. Secondary ajjpendage slender, usually con-
taining six or seven joints, though there may be as many as nine, each joint with minute
setae at the extremity ; flagellum more than twice as long as the peduncle, consisting of
a great number of joints, the setae on which are very short and fine, each joint bears a
single small olfactory cylinder.
The lower antennce (fig. 3) are more than half as long as the upper. The first joint of
the peduncle is very short and bears a single seta at the extremity of the lower margin ;
second joint very short, the gland-cone (the so-called "olfactory denticle") not reaching
quite to the end of the succeeding joint ; the third joint more than twice as long as
the second, upper margin curved, lower margin with a tuft of strong spiniform setae
at the extremity; fourth joint very long, upper surface bearing five tufts of two stout
setae each, the lower surface with numerous small tufts of stout setae and fine hau*s
irregularly arranged ; the fifth joint slightly longer than the fourth and narrower, upper
surface with about five small tufts, lower surface with five larger tufts of longer setae ;
flagellum usually about as long as the peduncle, though the relative lengths vary
somewhat; it usually contains about twenty joints, each bearing a few fine setae at the
extremity.
The dipper lip (fig. 4) is strongly chitinous and of the usual shape, being more or
less semicircular, very broad ; the apex bears a thick fur of minute setae, mostly con-
verging inwards.
The mandibles (figs. 5, 6, 7, 8) appear to present a pretty close resemblance to those of
Gammarus neglecttis as described and figured by Sars. The palp, which is the same in
both mandibles, is large and strong. The first joint is the shortest; it widens slightly
distally and bears four or five setae at the extremity. The second joint is about twice as
long as the first; it is rather broad, and bears on the inner margin about a dozen long
setae, those towards the end being the longest. The third joint is somewhat shorter than
the second, and bears on the surface of the side four small tufts each containing two
sette ; the outer margin is slightly curved and is free from setae ; the inner margin has
along its whole length, except a little at trie base, a thick fringe of stiff setae about half
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAIsT). 229
as long as the joint is wide ; at the extremity are three long setse nearly as long as the
joint itself.
The armature of the right mandible differs from that of the left, as is the case in this
and many other genera of the Amphipoda. In the left mandible (fig. G) the outer
cutting-edge consists of five strong teeth and the inner or secondary cutting-edge is
similar in general form but contains only four teeth, one of which is considerably longer
than the other three ; both outer and inner cutting-edges are curved so as to be concave
on the inner side. In the right mandible (figs. 7, 8) the outer edge is not unlike that
of the left, but contains only four teeth, and the imier cutting-edge is very different.
When seen in profile, as in figure 8, it appears slender, dividing into two branches
or forks, the upper one apparently tubercled, and the lower one bearing two or three
denticulations at its base ; in this view it seems not very unlike that of Gmnmarus
neglectns as figured by Sars [91, pi. iv. fig. 4]. When this inner cutting-edge is seen
en face (fig. 7), however, it is found to be much more like that of Crangonyx com-
^ac^w* than would at first have been suspected; the upper portion jiroves to be broad
and triangular in shape, with the edge dentate, and it is these denticulations which make
the piece appear tubercled when seen in profile; the lower piece is narrow and bears one
or two teeth on the surface at its base as already described.
Next to the secondary cutting-edge in each mandible follow four or five strong
denticulate or stiffly plumose setse. The molar tubercle docs not appear to present any
remarkable featm-e.
The lower Up (fig. 9) is of the usual form, deeply cleft, each lobe bearing on its
rounded extremity a number of very fine irregular seta>, and on its inner margin a thick
fringe of rather stouter setre.
The first mmilla (figs. 10, 11, 12) has the inner lobe very delicate and fringed with
nine or ten * delicate plumose seta?, each of which shows a transverse division at some
distance from the base ; the surface of this plate is also covered with fine delicate
scattered setae. The middle lobe ends in about ten strong setae, curving inwards ; most
of them have two sharj) teeth on the inner edge, but the two innermost bear more
numerous teeth. The palp has the first joint short, rectangular, and the second large,
flat, and curved inwards. On the left side (fig. 11) the palp ends in about seven stout
setae or spines, closely approximated together ; a single small simple seta is situated on
the surface at a slight distance from the extremity. In the maxilla on the left side
(hg. 12) the palp has the same general shape, but the setae at the end are much more
slender and not so crowded, and there appear to be only six of them. The difference
between the extremities of the two palps is reaUy rather greater than would appear to be
the case from figs. 11, 12, for the right maxilla is here considerably compressed in order
to show the spines more distinctly.
The second maxilla (fig. 13) has the form usual in Gammariis. The inner lobe
* The number of setse on the inner lobes of the first and second maxilla varies very greatly in different specimens.
The numbers given in the text probably represent the average. I have another drawing showing 13 on the inner
lobe of the first maxilla and 21 on that of the second maxilla.
30*
230 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
bears a very oblique row of about twelve * finely plumose setae similar to those on the
inner lobe of the first maxilla ; the inner margin of this lobe is fringed with many simple
setse and the surface of the lobe bears a few very fine simple setse scattered over it. The
outer lobe bears many long curved setse at the extremity as usual ; many, if not all, of
these are finely serrate on the inner side.
The maccillipedes (figs. 14, 15) are somewhat slender. When viewed from below
(fig. 14) the first joint [coxa) is seen to bear three setiB on the outer margin. The
next joint, the bases, is obliquely articulated with the coxa and bears near its base a
short transverse row of short setoe, and at its extremity towards the inner margin a
dense row of stout setae. The meros is rather longer than broad and bears a single seta
on its inner margin at the extremity. The carpus is about as long as the three preceding
joints together, and more than twice as long as broad ; its outer margin is regularly curved
and bears no setae ; the inner margin is nearly straight and is thickly fringed with setae,
which are chiefly arranged in irregular, short, transverse rows containing about two
or three setae each. The propodos is rather more than half as long as the carpus ; on its
outer margin at the extremity it bears two or three very long setae and its inner margin
is thickly fringed with long setae irregularly arranged in tufts. The dactylos is very
nearly as long as the propodos ; it is strongly curved and very acute ; the outer margin
bears a fairly long seta near the base, and the inner margin bears three small setae, the
third situated at the base of the terminal unguis, which is distinctly marked off from the
rest of the dactylos.
When seen from above (fig. 15) the carpus bears at the extremity an oblique row of
four or five long setae and another similar row on the surface at some distance from the
extremity ; the propodos has a longitudinal row of about twelve long setae along the centre
of the upper surface (just like that which Humbert draws in Niphargus puteanus, var.
iorelli [62, pi. vi. fig. 9]), and a small tuft of two setae near the outer margin. The inner
lobe of the maxillipede— that is, the one attached to the basos — is rectangular, and bears at
the end three stout spines and five or six longer stiffly-plumose setae ; the inner margin
also bears three or four similar plumose setae. The outer lobe attached to the ischium
bears on the inner margin about twelve stout spines, which, at the extremity, gradually
merge into long denticulate setae ; a few simple setae are found along the inner margin,
more particularly on the basal portion.
The gnatliopoda are about equal in size and almost identical in structure and in the
arrangernent of the setae on them, but the setae on the inner surface of each are more
numerous than, and very different from, those on the outer surface and require separate
description.
T\\Q first gnathopod (fig. 16) has the coxa (side-plate) nearly square, the lower surface
bearing a few fine setae. The basos is long, the front margin with a few irregular setae,
the posterior margin with a tuft at the extremity. Iscliivim very short, with a tuft
of setae on the posterior margin at the extremity, and this is extended into a short row
along the inner surface of the joint. Meros narrow when seen from the outside, being
partially overlapped by the carpus ; on the inner side it appears nearly rectangular, the
* !^eo note on previous page.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 231
end truncate and fringed with a dense double row of long sette, which also form a dense
tuft on the posterior side. The carpus is triangular, widening distally, the short posterior
margin being densely covered with long seta? arranged in five or six transverse rows ;
there are no setae on the outer surface, but on the inner surface there is a transverse
row of long setae along the end and another shorter row at a slight distance from the
end; there are also two small tufts at the antero-distal angle and another situated more
j)roximally. The j^i'opodos is lai-ge, fully as long as the bases, ovate, about twice as long
as broad, and not much broader than the carpus ; the outer surface bears few setae, then
a few very small ones along the anterior margin, a small tuft at the base of the dactylos,
and a few along the palm ; on the inner surface near the anterior margin are five
transverse rows each containing fx*om five to seven long setae : the palm is slightly
convex and occupies almost all the lower margin ; it is defined by two large spines, a
third large spine is situated on the inner surface a little nearer the base of the propodos,
and near it are two or three small transverse rows of setae ; between the end of the palm
and the base of the j)i'opodos are two other transverse rows on the posterior margin ; the
palm is armed with a double row of short stout spines, and near the edge of the palm on
the inner surface are about six small tufts of setae. The dactylos is long and curved,
fitting closely ou to the palm ; the inner surface bears about six small tufts of setae ; the
inner margin is minutely serrate, the serrations lying close to one another, and it bears
about fifteen minute s^iinules placed at regular distances from one another along the
inner edge ; the extremity is acute.
The second gnathopod (fig. 17) differs from the first in having the extremities of the
ischium and meros less densely fringed with setae; on the inner surface of the carpu.s
the transverse row situated a little from the end is very short, containing only about
six setae, and there is another small tuft near it ; in the propodos on the posterior
margin are six transverse rows, instead of two, between the base and the end of the
palm, and the tu.fts of setae near the palm are much smaller, containing only two or
three setae each.
The description of the gnathopoda, as given above, applies to the adult female. I am
unable at present to say whether the male differs in any particulars or not.
The first perceopod (fig. IS) is slender, of the same length as the second, and very
much shorter than the third. The coxa (side-plate) is rounded below and beax's a few
small setae irregularly placed along the margin. The bases is long, oblong in sliape ; the
anterior margin with three or four rather long setae near the base, and three short
spines towards the extremity ; the posterior margin is similarly supplied with setae, but
the long setae are further from the base. The ischium is short, rectangular, with a single
seta on the posterior margin at the extremity. The meros is slightly more than half as
long as the basos, and is somewhat produced at the antero-distal angle ; the anterior
margin is slightly convex, and bears three short spines, the last being at the extremity ;
the posterior margin is straight, and bears three tufts, each containing two slender setae.
The carpus is shorter than the meros, and bears on the posterior margin two spines and
a few slender setae. The propodos is a little longer than the carpus, and bears on the
posterior margin short spines arranged in four groups ; the anterior margin bears a few
232 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
fine hairs and a small tuft of setse at the base of the dactylos. The dactylos is rather
short, and hears a single seta on the inner margin, imperfectly marking off the terminal
unguis.
The second percBopod is similar in all respects to the first.
The tliird, fourth, and fifth perceopoda (see fig. 19) are all very long, and each is
longer than the preceding ; the fifth is about as long as the whole body. The lengths
of the perseopoda, as compared with the body, appear to vary, as is the ease also with
the antenmB, and to increase with the age and size of the animal. The coxae of these
peraeopoda are not easy to make out very distinctly ; that of the fifth is small, almost
semicircular, regularly curved below, and bearing four setse on the posterior portion ;
those of the third and fourth perseopoda appear similar, but flatter inferiorly, and with
fewer seta; ; that of the third fits in front into an emargination on the posterior side of
the coxa of the second pera?opod.
It will be sufficient to describe the fourth perceopod (figs. 19, 20) as a mean between
the third and fifth. The basos is not much expanded, and narrows distally; both
margins bear small spines arranged in slight serrations ; the ischium bears one or two
spines at the extremity of the anterior margin ; the meros, carpus, and propodos are all
similar, but each is longer and narrower, and bears more numerous setse than the
preceding. In all both margins bear numerous tufts of long spines arranged in slight
serrations ; the dactylos is fairly long, of the same width throughout until near the end,
where it narrows suddenly ; at this point on the inner margin are usually three setae,
though in large specimens there may be as many as six. In the tuft of setae at the
base of the dactylos are stout spines, fine setse, and one or two plumose setae similar to
the " auditory setse " found on the antennae and elsewhere, but much curved or bent at
the middle. Similar setse are found in most of the tufts on the posterior margin of the
propodos.
The plcopoda are of the usual shape, and the three pairs are almost identical. Fig. 21
represents the third pair ; in it the peduncle appears to consist of a short coxa and a
long basos about three times as long as broad. The outer margin is somewhat convex,
inner margin straight and bearing four fairly long setse, the longest being at the
extremity near the two " coupliug-spiues." The latter seem to closely resemble those
of Gammarus neglectus, as described and figured by Sars [91, p. 53], except that there
are two only instead of three, as in that species ; each bears three or four teeth on each
side.
The outer ramus, which is somewhat shorter than the inner, is hollowed out on its
inner side for the reception of the base of the inner ramus, and its margin, which is
thinned out, bears four or five of the ordinary plumose hairs. The first joint of the
inner ramus bears on its inner margin three "cleft-spines," like those described by
Stebbing.
The first and second pleopoda appear slightly larger than the third, and have the
spines on the inner margin of the peduncle smaller and fewer, otherwise they precisely
resemble the thu'd pleopoda.
The first uropoda (fig. 22) extend as far backwards as the extremity of the second
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 233
tiropoda ; there is a strong spine on the body-segment just at their base. The peduncle
is considerably longer than the rami ; its lo\yer margin straight or slightly curved, upper
surface broad, concave ; both inner and outer margins supplied with about six small
spines, a large spine nearly half as long as the inner ramus being situated at the
extremity of the inner margin. The outer ramus is slightly longer than the inner ;
upper margin with three small spines, a large one and two small ones at the extremity ;
inner ramus similar, but with two large spines at the extremity.
The second uropoda (fig. 23) are small, not reaching to the end of the peduncle of
the third uropoda. Peduncle stout, about as long as the rami, concave above, both
inner and outer upper margins with two or three spines ; outer ramus slightly shorter
than the inner, upper margin with three small spines, a large one and two small ones
at the extremity ; inner ramus with its upper margin supplied with about twelve small
spines arranged closely in a row, two large ones and two or three short ones at the
extremity.
The third uropoda (fig. 24) are very long, nearly as long as the whole pleou. The
peduncle, is rectangular, about three times as long as broad, two setae on the side near
the lower margin ; upper surface slightly concave ; both inner and outer margins with
spines, two or three at the extremity of the outer margin and one large one at the
extremity of the inner margin. The two rami of equal length, nearly twice as long as
the peduncle, each cylindrical, scarcely tapering towards the end ; outer surface of each
with five groups, each containing three spines ; inner surface with five similar groups of
stout spines, and in addition a number of long plumose hairs ; extremity of each with
about six or seven spines of various lengths.
In fig. 24' the last urojioda are represented as usually seen, the outer row of setse
being shown on the outer ramus and the inner row with the plumose hairs being seen
on the inner ramus, which is somewhat twisted round. The spines or setae on these
uropoda arc shorter in proportion to the appendage in large specimens, and this is the
case also with the spines on the legs and in other parts of the body.
The telson (fig. 25) is short, reaching only slightly beyond the base of the pedimcle
of the last uropod. It is cleft right to the base, each half being more or less rectangular ;
the outer margin curved, extremity straight or slightly rounded, bearing on the inner
half fovu- long spines about half as long as the telson, and towards the outer side two or
three similar spines situated a slight distance from the extremity.
The above description applies to fully developed females. I am not able to say
whether the males differ from the females in the last pair of uropoda. as in Niphargus,
but the numerous specimens that I have seen and closely examined all agree with the
description given above.
Genus Cai/Liopius, Leach.
(Bate & Westwood, Brit. Sessile-eyed Crust, i. p. .259.)
Of this genus Bate and Westwood give only the following as the generic character : —
*' Like Pherusa, except that at least the second pair of gnathopoda have the propodos
234 DE. C. CHILTON OF THE SUBTEREAXEAN
largely developed " [4, p. 259] ; and of Fherusa they merely say, " Like Atyliis, but
telson not divided. Gnathopoda small " [4, p. 252].
According to Stebbing the genus Am2Mthopsis, Boeck, is most probably a synonym
of Phcrusa, and of this genus he gives the following account in his notice of Bocck's
work. The genus is, he states, instituted for those species which have " an elongate,
compressed body with moderate epimera and long antennae ; the inner plate of the first
maxillae furnished with four or five long, thick, plumose setae ; the inner plate of the
second maxillae with many simple setae at the extremity, but several on the inner side
very strong and plumose ; the maxillipeds large, with palps of moderate length ; the
two first pairs of feet with hands of nearly the same size, small ; the third and fourth
pairs of legs with the fifth joint very long, longer than the third joint ; the telson
simple; the last uropods with the branches long, often unequal ; the marsupial plates
much larger than the branchiae, closely margined with hairs " [108, p. 324].
It appears to me that all the genera mentioned, together with several other allied
genera, require careful revision and systematic redescription ; and in the meantime I
prefer to leave my species CalUopius suhterraneus under CalUopius, where I first placed
it, although, if we consider only the female, it should no doubt be put in the same genus
as Fherusa ccerulea, Gr. M. Thomson. It is evident, too, that due attention must be
paid to the sexual diff'erences, for in CalUopius subterraneus the female is a Pherusa,
while the male, which diflPers chiefly in the possession of larger gnathopoda, would be
better placed under CalUopius.
Calliopius subterraneus, Chilton. ( j , PI. XXII. figs. 1-15, PI. XXIll. figs. 1-9 ;
5 , PL XXIII. figs. 10-18.)
Calliope subterranea, Chiltou, New Zealaud Joiu'ual of Science, vol. i. (January 1882) p. 14 ; id.
Transactions New Zealaud Institute, vol. xiv. p. 177, plate ix. figs. 1-10; id. New Zealand Journal
of Science, vol. ii. (March 1884) p. 89.
Calliopius subterraneus, Thomson & Chilton, Transactions New Zealand Institute, vol. xviii. p. 148 ;
Thomson, Transactions New Zealaud Institute, vol. xxi. p. 2G2.
Calliope subterranea, Monicz, " Faune des Eaux souterraiues du Departement du Nord &c.," cxtrait de
la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France, tome i. (1888-89) p. 50 ; Wrzesniowski, " O trzech kielzacb
podziemnych," De tribiis Crustaceis Amphipodis subterraneis, pp. 16, 90 ; id. " Ueber drei unter-
irdische Gammariden,'' Zeitschrift t'iir wissenschaftliche Zoologie, L. 4, pp. 611, 698.
Specific description. — Male. Cephalon not produced into an appreciable rostrum. Eyes
wanting. Upper antennae about two-thirds the length of the body; first joint of
peduncle stout, second and third each much shorter than the preceding; secondary
flagellum represented by a minute joint shorter than first joint of mam flagellum.
Lower antennae stout, much shorter than the upper ; flagellum about as long as the
peduncle. Calceoli are present on the second and third joints of the peduncle, and on
the flagellum of the upper antenna, and on the flagellum of the lower antemia. First
gnathopod very large and strong ; carpus very short ; propodos much longer than basos ;
palm occupying nearly the whole of the posterior margin. Second gnathopod also large,
but more slender than the first; carpus triangular, more than half as long as propodos;
palm of propodos convex, occupying about half the posterior margin. Last three pairs
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 235
of peracopoda long and slender, each much longer than the preceding. Second uropods
with the outer branch only about half as long as the inner. Telson rather short, sul)-
reetangular ; postei'ior angles rounded and each furnished with a single fine seta; hinder
margin slightly concave.
Female. Differs from the male in the following points : the size is smaller, only about
two-thirds as large ; the antennae are more slender and less strongly supplied with setae,
and apparently do not bear calceoli ; the gnathopoda are much smaller and more slender,
the first having the carpus triangular, as long as the propodos, which is elliptical, and has
the palm only sHghtly oblique; the second guathopod is very long and slender, carpus
and propodos similar, narrow oblong, carpus much longer than propodos, palm of latter
quite transverse.
Length. Largest male 12 mm. ; largest female about 6 mm.
Colour. White, semitransparent.
Habitat. Eyreton [Chiltoj/), Lincoln (i". Wilkinson), Ashbvu'tou (/?'. W. Smith and
J. B. Ilayne), Winchester (_D. L. Iincood) : in wells.
Remarks. The female of this species bears a very close general resemblance to Fhernsa
ccerulea, G. M. Thomson [107, p. 2(;6j. I had judged this to be the case from the
comparison of Stebbing's figures of the latter with my specimens, and an examination
of specimens of Pherusa ccerulea, kindly supplied by Mr. Thomson, shows that the
resemblance is even closer than I had imagined. Pherusa cceridea is stouter in body,
has the side-2:)lates deeper, and of course diflers also in the possession of eyes and in
its very distinct dark blue colour, but in the form of the antennae, the mouth-parts, and
the gnathopods there is little difference of any importance. The upper antenna has a
rudimentary secondary flagellum (not mentioned in Stebbing's description), as in Cal-
liopins sithterraneus, but it is somewhat longer, being longer than the first joint of the
main flagellum ; in the specimen I have dissected there are small calceoli on both
antennae, just as in the specimens of Calliopias subterratieus that I have described below
as " immature males." The gnathopods have the same general si i ape, but are not so
long and slender, and, especially in the second, do not bear so many tufts of setae as in
the female of Calliopius siihterranei(s ; the peiseopoda are shorter, the uropoda are similar
and in like manner armed with spines, but the second has the branches less unequal
in length, and the telson is rounder. The specimen of Pherusa ccerulea that I have
examined is probably a young male, but none of the few specimens in my hands liave the
gnathopoda so largely developed as in C'alliopius suhterraneus. On the whole it appears
that the two species are very closely related, and eitlier Calliopius suhterraneus has been
derived from Pherusa ccBrulea, or, what is more likely, both have been derived from a
closely allied species once widely spread in New Zealand.
Calliopius Jluviatilis, G. M. Thomson, is very common in freshwater streams in New
Zealand, but is not so closely allied to the subterranean species as is Pherusa ccerulea.
It differs considerably in the gnathopoda, and in the last pair of peraeopoda, which
have the last joint simple, ending in a small pencil of long hairs, as in sr)ecies of
the ffidiceroidae, and it seems scarcely necessary to compare it in detail with Calliopius
subterraneiis.
SKCOND SEKIES. — ZOOLOGY VOL. VI. HI
236 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERKANEAN
Detailed Description.
In tliis species the male differs in a very marked manner from the female, being of
considerably larger size, differing also in the antennae and particularly in the gnathopoda.
The males are very much rarer than the females ; I have seen only about half a dozen
males altogether, while I must have seen hundreds of specimens of the female. It ^vill
be convenient to describe the male first, and afterwards to point out more in detail the
characters in which the female differs from the male.
The body (PI. XXII. fig. 1) is smooth, fairly stout. The head is longer than the first
segment of the peraeon ; the segments of the peraeon subequal ; first three segments of the
pleon considerably longer than the last segment of the peraeon. The side-plates of the first
four segments of the peraeon are nearly as deep as their respective segments. The
inferior margins of the first three segments of the pleon are regularly rounded and have
no setae.
Eyes. There is no external sign of the eyes.
The tipper antennce (fig. 2) are more than two-thirds as long as the body. The
peduncle has the first joint stout, about half as broad as long, with a few minute setae
scattered over it, the lower surface with a row of about seven or eight short setae, and
at the extremity three or four long auditory setae. Tlie second joint is about two-thirds
as long as the first, but not much more than half the width ; the lower surface bears a
few minute spinules and some longer setae at the extremity ; on the inner surface, towards
the upper side, is a row of three or four " calceoli," at the base of each of which are two
or three simple setae. Third joint about half as long as the second, similarly furnished
with calceoli and setae. There is a minute secondary appendage on the inner surface,
consisting of a single small joint tipped with two setae. The flageUum is more than
twice as long as the jieduncle, and consists of a great number of joints, of which about
the first third bear calceoli arranged in two rows, the first being situated on the inner
surface towards the upper margin, the other also on the inner surface but lower down,
and being on joints of the flagellum alternating with those that bear the first-mentioned
row of calceoli, the part of each joint that bears a calceolus is somewhat produced into a
small rounded prominence, which bears three or four simple setae as well as the
calceolus. Towards the extremity of the flagellum the joints become much more
elongated and cease to bear calceoli. Olfactory cylinders are found on the joints which do
not bear calceoli, as well as on some, if not all, of those which do bear calceoli.
The lower antennce (fig. 4) are al^out half as long as the upper, both the peduncle
and the flagellum being rather stout. The " gland-cone " attached to the second joint
is rather large and prominent, and bears two separate setae at some little distance from
the apex. The short third joint is grooved below, and bears at the extremity of its
lower margin two simple setae ; its articulation with the fourth joint is very oblique. The
fourth joint is rather broad, neai"ly half as broad as long ; its upper margin bears thi-ee setae
in slight serrations ; there is a tuft of four setae in the middle of the lower margin and
another larger tuft at the extremity. The fifth joint is slightly longer than the fourth ;
on the upper surface it bears four or five small tufts of setae, and on the lower margin
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 2;]7
four larger tufts ; aloug tlie extremity is a row of about seven auditory setse. The
flagellum is rather longer than the peduncle, and is stout, especially toward the base,
where each joint is much broader than long. It bears two rows of calceoli, arranged in
the same way as in the upper antenna; the calceoli decrease in size towards the end of
the flagellum, and cease entirely at about the seventh joint from the end. In addition
to the calceoli each joint bears a few simple setse at the extremity.
The general appearance of the calceoli is shown in fig. 3. These organs have been
fully investigated by Blanc, as I learn from the abstract given by Stebbing. The
general arrangement of the calceoli in the present species appears to resemble closely
that in Eusiroides ccBsaris as described and figured by Stebbing [108, p. t)70]. When
seen in profile, the outline of the calceolus is very different from that shown in fio-. 3,
and is more like that shown by Stebbing in his figure of the calceoli of Tryphosa
antennipotcns [108, pi. vi. fig. a. s. with enlargement]. In that species, too, the
calceoli on both antennae are arranged in the same way as in the present species —
" in both pairs so placed that, while the calceoli of alternate joints are seen full face,
those of the other alternate joints will be seen in profile " [108, p. G18].
The iqjj^er lip (fig. 5) is rather large, oval in outline, widening distally ; the end is
regularly rounded at the corners and nearly straight in the centre, and bears many short
converging setse.
Mandibles (figs. 6, 7, 8). The left mandible is shown in fig. 6, and differs consider-
ably from the right in the details of the cutting-edges. The palp, which is the same in
both mandibles, is large and rather broad. Its first joint is very short, not much longer
than broad; it bears no sette. The second joint is the largest, being rather more than
three times as long as the first ; it expands slightly towards the distal end, and bears at
the extremity on the inner margin, which is there convex, a row of six or seven fiiirly
long setiE. The third joint is about three-fourths as long as the second ; it is broadest
near the base, narrows considerably toward the end, and is much curved, so that tbe
extremity is almost at right angles to the plane in which the base of the joint lies (the
double curving is not well shown in the figure). Along its concave margin it is thickly
fringed with a dense row of short setse ; three longer ones are situated at the extremity.
The surface on the concave side appears striated, the ajjpearance being probably due to
rows of very minute setse.
The molar tubercle is strong ; it has the extremity oblique, and covered, as usual, with
rows of short spines. The sides of the tubercle bear numerous fine setae, and in
connection with it is a long filament or seta, as described by Humbert in Niphargiia
puteanus, by Sars in Gammariis neglectiis, and by other authors.
The outer cutting-edge of the left mandible (fig. 7) consists of about six sharp
teeth of varying shape, as shown in the figure ; the inner or secondary is edge somew hat
similar, but contains only four main teeth. Both edges are very concave on the inside,
and were a good deal compressed in the slide from which fig. 7 was drawn ; between
the inner edge and the molar tubercle are five or six stout bristles.
The right mandible differs principally from the left in the two cutting-edges. The
outer edge is similar to that of the left, but appears to consist of five main teeth only,
31*
238 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
and usually presents tlie appearance shown in fig. 8. The inner edge is very different
from that of the left ; it has a stout rounded base, and bifurcates towards the end ; each
division tapers to a point, bears one or two teeth, and is more or less tubercled, as shown
in the figure.
Lower Up. Fig. 9 represents a portion of the lower lip of the large male from which this
description is taken, the appendage having been torn in dissecting it out ; the whole of the
lip is better shown in PL XXIII. fig. 10, which is taken from a female specimen. The two
outer lobes are comparatively long and narrow towards the extremity ; their outer
margins are fringed with very delicate setae, and the inner margins bear numerous short
setae curving inward. The division between the two lobes does not appear to reach
quite to the base of the lip. The inner lobes were not observed in the female ; a part
which probably belongs to them is shown in the drawing taken from the male (PL XXII.
fig. 9). The lateral backward processes are moderately long and narrow.
The^y^r*^ maxilla (PL XXII. fig. 10, 11, 12, 13) in the male specimen dissected had the
inner plate very small and delicate, oval, and with five plumose setae on the inner margin.
The middle lobe is broad, rectangular, squarely truncate at the end, and bears about twelve
strongly denticulated spines, as shown in fig. 11 ; the form and position of these spines
will be more easily understood from the figure than from a verbal description. The palp
has the first joint short, not much longer than broad, the end somewhat oblique ; the
second joint is long and curved, rather broad, and terminates in the right (?) maxilla
(fig. 12) in about seven stout, short setae or spines. The two outermost are the longest
and narrowest and are bristled ; the others, which are short and stout, form very sharp
teeth ; near the base of the second tooth from the outside arises a single shnple seta.
In the other maxilla (fig. 13) the end of the jjalp is very different; it bears five setae,
very much longer and narrower than those on the right (?) ; the single simj)le seta arises
from the base of the second outermost one as on the right (?).
The second maxilla is shown in fig. 14, and does not appear to present any remark-
able feature. On the surface of the inner lobe is an oblique row containing seven
plumose setae. The surface of this lobe towards the base is covered with very fine
delicate setae, and similar setae are found on the outer margins of both lobes towards
their extremities. The end of the outer lobe bears about seven or eight long setae,
curved slightly inward ; the end of the inner lobe bears similar setae, which are, how-
ever, much shorter, and some of them plumose. The setae extend some distance along
the inner margin, but gradually become smaller as they recede from the extremity.
The maxilUpedes, as seen from below, are shown in fig. 15. The bases hears at its
extremity, towards the inner side, a group of nine or ten long setae ; the plate attached to
it — the inner plate — extends only as far as the end of the inner margin of the meros; it
bears at the end two stout sharp teeth and a third more slender, and numerous stiffly
plumose bristles ; its inner margin bears five or six plumose hairs. The ischium bears at
the extremity a group of setae as in the basos ; the plate attached to it — the outer plate —
reaches as far as the extremity of the outer edge of the meros ; its inner edge is straight
and bears about ten moderately stout spines, which gradually merge at the end into long,
stiffly plumose, curved setae ; in addition to these spines the inner margin bears
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 239
numerous slender setae ; the convex outer margin of the plate is also supplied with
many very fine seta? like those found on some parts of the maxillae. The meros
bears about six setae on the outer margin towards the extremity and numerous setae
on its inner margin. The carpus is similarly supplied with setae. The propodos
is about two-thirds as long as the Ciirpus ; it bears three or four setae on the outer
margin, and numerous long ones on the inner margin and on the surface near to it ;
on the upper surface of the propodos (fig. 16) is a longitudinal row of about twelve
set;e, extending right along the centre, with a few others more or less irregularly placed ;
the outer extremity of the propodos at the base of the dactylos is produced into a small
rounded lobe. The dactylos is long and slender, being about two-thirds the length of
the propodos ; both margins bear five or six setae ; it narrows somewhat abruptly at the
extremity, and bears a stout spine or nail. The normal form of the dactylos is shown
in fig. 16 ; that shown in fig. 15 is evidently deformed, and was found on the right side
of the same maxillipede.
The foregoing descriptions of the mouth-parts have been taken from a large-sized
male specimen. The mouth-parts of the female differ in several respects and are
described belo^^, where some remarks on the probable changes that take place in the
mouth-parts during the development of the male will also be found.
The^rs^ gnathopod (PI. XXIII. fig. 1) is very large and strong, much larger than the
second. The coxa (side-plate) is nearly as deep as its segments and is rhomboidal in outline,
projecting strongly forward ; it bears a very minute seta at tlic anterior end of the lower
margin, and one or two at the hinder end. The basos is long, somewhat curved at the
base ; the anterior surface is grooved to receive the propodos when the limb is bent back
at rest. The ischium is short and of the usual form. The meros is short, not much
longer than the ischium ; the anterior surface is rounded and bears a number of setae
more or less regularly arranged in three transverse rows. The carpus is very short,
subtriangular, produced below on the outer side into a small rounded lobe, densely
tipped with setae ; when seen from the inside (fig. 2) the carpus appears quite rect-
angular. The propodos is very large, much longer than the basos ; the upper margin is
regularly curved and without setae, except one or two very small ones at the base of the
dactylos ; the basal part of the lower margin forms a rounded lobe densely covered with
numerous setae arranged in five transverse rows ; the palm occupies the whole length of
the lower margin with the exception of this lobe ; it appears rather broad, the outer
edge bearing ten small tufts of rather long setae, each tuft containing from two to four
setae. When seen from the inside (fig. 2) the end of the palm, against which the
dactylos impinges, appeal's to be slightly concave ; the end is defined by three long
spines ; roimd the edge of the hollow on the inside is a row of about seven shorter
spines, and near them are some simple setae more or less regularly arranged in tufts. The
inner edge of the palm is rather convex, and, except towards the proximal end of the
palm, it extends beyond the inner edge ; it is minutely serrate and fringed with a few
small setae, and near it is a longitudinal series of about twelve short oblique rows of
long setae, each containing from five to ten setae. The dactylos is large and strong,
slightly curved, and with a few very minute setae on the concave margin, but these do
240 DK. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
not project beyond the margin of the dactylos ; the extremity is not distinctly marked
off into a terminal unguis.
The second gnutliopod (PI. XXIII. figs. 3, 4) is slightly longer than the first, but is much
more slender. The coxa is rectangular, deeper than broad, the lower angles rounded,
and with six minute seta? on the lower margiu ; arising from the coxa there appear to
be two * gill-plates, one rather larger than the other. The basos is long, nearly straight,
the posterior margin bearing seven or eight long setae on the proximal half, and a
shorter one at the extremity. The ischium is rather long, one-third as long as the basos ;
its j)osterior margin bears three or four small setae. The meros is about as long as the
ischium ; its distal extremity bears a fringe of about eight or nine long setoe. The carpus
is nearly as long as the ischium and meros together ; it is subtri angular, very narrow
at the base, and rather loosely articulated to the meros, so that the distal jiart of the
limb can readily turn upon this as a pivot, and hence often appears reversed, as shown
in the figure of the whole animal (PL XXII. fig. 1). The anterior margin of the carpus
is nearly straight, with a single minute seta at the extremity ; the posterior margin is
strongly curved, and thickly fringed with long setae arranged in about twelve transverse
rows, a small tuft of two or three being situated on the outer surface near the extremity.
On the inner surface (PI. XXIII. fig. 4) the carpus bears towards the extremity a transverse
row of four or five setae and three or four separate setae placed more proximally along the
middle of the joint. The propodos is longer than the carpus and meros combined ; the
anterior margin is straight, giving the limb a somewhat awkward appearance ; towards
the end it bears three or four minute setae and two or three at the base of the dactylos ;
the posterior margin is strongly convex, the palm occupying more than one-half the
whole length ; it is defined by a stout spine and fringed on the outer surface with
minute spinules, arranged singly, and a row of six separate long setae running parallel
to the palm ; the basal part of the margin below the palm is thickly fringed with long-
setae, arranged in about eleven transverse rows as in the carpus. When the propodos is
viewed from the inside, the dactylos is seen to extend a little beyond the defining-spine
and to fit into a slight depression bordered by four spines, one of which is much longer
than the others ; running parallel to the palm is a longitudinal series of from twelve to
fifteen obHque rows of long setae, each containing from two to four. The dactylos is
similar to that of the first gnathopod, but is not so large and powerful.
The first percBOpod. (fig. 5) has the coxa (side-plate) and basos entirely simikir to those
of the second gnathopod, and, like it, appears to bear a double gill-plate. The ischium is
short and of the usual form. The meros is oblong, rather more than half the length of
the basos ; its posterior margin straight, with five or six separate setae, the anterior
margin slightly convex and with the distal angle a little produced ; it bears a seta near
the middle and another at the extremity. The carpus is more than half the length of
* Though there are certainly two plates attached to the coxa, both in the second gnathopod and in the lirst and
second perseopoda, in the male specimen dissected, I have not found them in female specimens, and am not sure that
the second plate is a gill-plate. It differs in appearance from the true gill-plate, and might be considered a brood-
plate, but it bears no setae on the margin, and I am practically certain that the specimen is a male.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 241
the meros and is similarly furnished with setae, but those on the posterior margin are
rather stouter than in the meros. The propodos is longer than the carpus and rather
more slender; its anterior margin bears six liue setae and the posterior margin six
groups, each containing one stout seta and usually one or two small ones. The dactylos
is of average length, very acute, with the terminal unguis imperfectly defined ; on the
outer margin, near the base, it bears a single seta, sparingly plumose at the end.
The second fcrccopod is similar in all respects to the first.
The third, fourth, and Jifth, permopoda are all similar to each other, but each is
larger than the j^receding ; each appears to have only one gill-plate. Fig. 6 represents
the third ferceopod and may be taken as a sample. The coxa is normally deep, distinctly
bilobed, the posterior lobe being rather the larger. The basos is considerably expanded,
oval in shape, about two-thirds as broad as long ; its anterior margin bears nine or ten
stout setge ; the posterior margin minutely serrate and having a small seta in each
serration. The ischium as usual. The meros is rather broad, the postero-distal angle
somewhat produced, both margins with groups of long stout setae. The carpus is longer
than the meros, but much narrower ; the propodos somewhat longer than the carpus ;
both bear groups of long stout setre on both margins, those on the anterior margin being
larger than those on the posterior margin. The dactylos is like that of the first peraeopod,
but bears three small setse on the outer margin in addition to the plumose one near the base.
li\\Q first pleopod is of the usual form ; the jieduncle is rather short and has both
margins free from setae; there are two coupliug-spiues, each l)earing three or four teeth;
the first joint of the inner ramus bears two cleft spines ; the inner ramus is slightly
longer than the outer.
The second and third pleopoda are similar to the first.
The first vropod (fig. 7) has the peduncle long and slender, much longer than the
rami; its upper surface is flat or slightly concave; both the upper margins supplied wdth
spines. In the large male there were only three or four spines on each margin, but in
females the spines are usually much more numerous (compare PI. XXIII. figs. 7, 16).
The two rami are similar, with spines on both margins and longer spines at the ends ;
the outer ramus is a little shorter than the inner.
The second uropod (fig. 8) is shorter than the first and has the outer ramus not
much more than half as long as the inner. It is supplied with setse in a similar manner
to the first uropod.
The third uropod (fig. 9) reaches further back than the others, the j)eduncle
reaching as far as the ends of the first and second urojiods ; it bears spine-like setae ou
both the upper margins. The rami are longer than the peduncle, somewhat broad,
narrowing gradually to the ends, which are acute and bear no setse ; both margins of each
bear thi'ee or four tufts of small spines. In the male specimen drawn the outer ramus
is somewhat shorter than the inner, but in females the two rami are of about the same
length and the whole uropod is rather longer and more slender (compare figs. 9, 11,
PI. XXIII.).
The telson (see fig. 17) is short, not reaching to the end of the peduncle of the third
uropod ; it is nearly rectangular, rather broader than long ; the angles at the extremity
242 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
rounded, and eacli bearing a fine hair ; the hinder margin slightly concave. Fig. 17
is taken from a female ; in one male specimen examined the hinder margin was slightly
more concave.
Sexual differences. The female differs from the male as above described in many charac-
teristic features, and especially in the gnathopoda, so that if they had not been taken
together it is rather unlikely that the two forms would both have been assigned to the
same species. With the facts before me, however, I have no doubt that we have to deal
with the two sexes of the one species. The one form I consider the male from its largely
developed gnathopoda, from the absence of brood-plates &c., although I have not actually
found fully- developed spermatozoa in it. The other form is undoubtedly a female, for I
have frequently taken it bearing eggs; it is found associated with the male both at
Eyreton and Ashburton ; it is much smaller, the largest specimens being not more than
two-thirds the size of the largest male, and it is very much more numerous. Although I
have not yet obtained a complete series of transitional forms, still from the facts given
below I feel convinced that in this species, as in many other Amphipoda, the young male
at first resembles the female in the form of the gnathopoda &c., and that the peculiar
characteristics of the male are not acquired until the animal has attained to sexual
maturity.
In the female the antennce are more slender than in the male ; in accordance with
the smaller size of the animal, the setse on them are less prominent, especially in the
lower antenna?, and the calceoli are wanting. I have found calceoli in some specimens
which in other characters closely resembled females, but, as I have already said, these are
more probably immature males. As the calceoli in these specimens are of very small
size, extremely delicate and transparent, and hence easily overlooked, I thought at
first that they were perhaps present also in the females, though I had failed to see
them ; however, I have since looked for them very carefully in several mature females
and can find no trace of them.
In the upj)er lip, the mandibles, and the lower lip the female does not appear to differ
from the male.
In the first maxilla the inner lobe is larger and bears fully twice as many plumose setse
as in the male specimen drawn in tig. 10, PI. XXII. It is quite possible that the number
of plumose setse on the inner plate of this maxilla bears some relation to the size of the
animal irrespective of its sex ; but all the female specimens examined have about twice
the number found in the male, and I have not had sufficient male specimens of different
sizes to be able to decide how many of these setae are usually present, or whether
the one figured is exceptional or not.
In full-grown females the setae on the middle lobe and at the end of the palp closely
resemble those of the male as drawn, the two palps being different as in the male.
In the second maxilla in tlie female the oblique row of plumose setse contains about
twice as many setse as in the male figured in fig. VI, n, and the remarks made in con-
nection with the first maxilla apply to the second maxilla also.
In the maxilliiiedes (fig. 11, PI. XXIII.) we find a very considerable difference between
the two sexes (compare fig. 15, PI. XXII., and fig. 11, PI. XXIII.) . In the female the two
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 243
lobes are cousiderahly larger than in the male, the inner lobe reaching nearly to the end
of the ottter margin of the meros, and the outer lobe nearly to the end of the carpus ; the
lobes are also broader, but the armature of each is practically the same in both sexes.
The meros, carpus, and propodos bear fewer setse in the female, especially on the outer
margins, and I cannot find the central row of setae along the upper surface of the propodos
which was certainly present in the male specimen figured. Notwithstanding these
differences, there is a very close agreement ia other respects, the resemblance being greater
than would be imagined from a comparison of fig. 15, PI. XXII., and fig. 11, PI. XXIII. ;
and I wish to repeat that I am not yet certain how far the differences observed are due
to sex and how far to size alone.
It is, however, in the gnathopoda that wc find the greatest difference between the
sexes ; and it is, perhaps, worthy of note that each gnathopod is quite different in the
two sexes, while in most cases in the Amphipoda one pair, at least, is the same, or ucai'ly
the same, in both male and female.
The first gnaihoiiod of the female (figs. 12, 13, PI. XXIII.) has the basos rather stout,
widening distally, its posterior margin bearing a few setae. The ischiwii and raerOA' short,
subequal, each witli a few setse at the extremity on the posterior mai-gin. The carpus
triangular, a feAV setse on the anterior margin ; the posterior margin irregularly serrate and
with small tufts or transverse rows of seta^, an oblique row of four or five seta; being situated
on the svirfacc of the joint near the postero-distal corner. The i^ropodos is about as long
as the carpus and not broader than the latter at its distal end, subelliptical in outline ; the
anterior margin with three or four seta? and a small tuft at the base of the dactylos ; the
posterior margin with four short transverse rows, an oblique row of seven or eight widely
separated setae extending along the surface of the joint near the posterior margin ; the palm
is a little oblique, defined by two stout setae, its edge somewhat creuate and fringed with
a few small setae. The dactylos moderately stout, curved, with a few seta? on its inner
margin.
The second gnathopod (figs. 11, 15) is similar in general structure to the first, but is
much longer and more slender. The basos, ischium, and meros are all similar to those of
the first gnathopod, but more slender ; the carpus is very long, much longer than the
propodos, narrow oblong, its posterior margin with about eight or nine tufts of setae in
slight serrations ; the propjodos is also oblong in outline, of the same width as the
carpus, both mai'gins with tufts of seta?, those on the posterior margin the longer, a very
distinct transverse row being situated at the base of the dactylos ; the palm is transverse,
defined by a small jirojection and a stout seta ; the dactylos very short.
In the perceopoda, pleopoda, and uropoda the female does not differ from the male
except in the few small points already mentioned, and it is quite probable that these
are as much due to size as to difference of sex. I have, however, usually found the
telson a Little more deejoly emarginate on the hinder margin in tlie male than in the
female, but the difference is very slight.
I have several times found small specimens otherwise like the ordinary female form
but bearing calceoli on both antennae, the calceoli being much smaller and much less
numerous than in the adult male, as above described, but similarly arranged. The
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 82
244 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
gnathopods of these forms, which I consider immature males, are usually quite like
those of the ordinary female form ; but I have rough di'awings of one (made in 1883) in
which the j)ropodos of the first gnathopod is more ovate, the palm oblique, occupying
fully half the posterior margin, and the tufts of setae much reduced in number and
containing shorter setae or spines ; the second gnathopod has the carpus as usual, but
the propodos is shorter and differs in shape, being somewhat expanded distally, the
posterior margin bears only three tufts of setse instead of about eight as usual, and the
palm is rather oblique. It will be seen that in so far as this specimen differs from tlie
female it approaches towards the male ; I have, however, not succeeded in finding any
other forms intermediate between this and the fully-developed male. This particular
specimen presented a peculiarity in the third pair of uropoda, having the two rami very
unequal, one being as long as the peduncle and the other twice as long ; I have never
seen any other specimen with this peculiarity in such a marked degree, though specimens
are occasionally seen in which the two rami are a little unequal.
In the first maxilla these " immature males " differ very considei*ably from the adult
form ; the ends of the paljis of the right and left maxilljB are quite symmetrical, and the
armature of the end of the outer lobe consists chiefly of broad comb-like setae like those
shown in fig. 18, PI. XXIII., being thus about as different as can be from the adult
form as shown in fig. 11, PI. XXII. In the former figure, only some of the setse are
shown, those on one side ; the other curved denticulated seta? which are found on the
other side and particularly towards the inner margin have been omitted in order to
show clearly those that are represented. I have found the first maxilla to be similar to
this in other small forms in which I could find no calceoli whatever, which were
jn'obably either still younger males or young females, and I suppose that this form of
the first maxilla is to be found only in immature individuals. Adult females have the
first maxilla practically the same as that of the large male represented in figs. 18, 19, 20,
21, PL XXIII., so far as the two palps and the armatui'e of the middle lobe are concerned.
I have not as yet found intermediate forms between the adult and the small specimens.
Summary of the more important points in Part IV.
It will be convenient here to summarize briefly the more important points that have
been brought out in the examination of the six species now described, as some of them
might otherwise be overlooked in the mass of technical description.
(1) The genus Phreatoicus is shown to be a very peculiar one, requiring for its re-
ception the creation of a new family, the Plireatoicidoe, which approaches in some
respects to Asellidoe, differing, however, very much in the laterally-compressed body and
the long six-jointed j)leon.
(2) The pleopoda of Phreatoicits are well-developed and in some respects different
from those of most other Isopoda. In the first pair there is a one-jointed endopodite
and a one-jointed exopodite ; in all the other pairs the exopodite is two-jointed, Avhile in
tlie third, fourth, and fifth pairs there is also a separate appendage arising from the
protopodite and probably representing the epipodite. In the male the second pair of
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 245
pleopoda are specialh' modified, the penial filament being formed from a portion of the
endopodite, a fact that will perhaps be useful to throw light on the more modified
second pleopoda in the males of various Asellidse, &c.
(3) A consideration of the eoxoe of Phreatoicns leads to a short discussion in support
of Spence Bate's contention that the "epimera " or " side-plates " are in reality the coxa'
of the appendages of the perseon.
(4) In discussing the systematic position of Phreotoicus reference is made to the
external characters by which the Amphipoda are separated from the Isopoda, and an
additional difl"ei'ence is shown to exist in the ischia of the appendages of the perteon, as
these are of moderate length in all Isopoda except the Apseudidai and Tanaidse, whih'
they are almost always very short in the Amphipoda.
(5) The genus Critregeifs, belonging to the Anthuridse, is described and compared
with some allied genera. It has only six pairs of legs, and thus appears to perma-
nently retain this larval character of the Isopoda, owing probably to an arrest of
development.
(6) The mouth-parts of Cruregens, which are very diificult to determine, are fully
described, and it is shown that the mandibles are small and without any trace of a
palp — a character very exceptional in the Anthuridae.
(7) The terminal uropoda of Cruregens are shown to consist of an oblong peduncle,
a long narrow exopodite arising from near the anterior end of the peduncle, and a
one-jointed endopodite arising from its posterior end. Other authors, with the exception
of Dohrn, have apparently wrongly described the uropoda of the Anthuridoe as having
a two-jointed endopodite, the distal portion of the pedvmcle having been mistaken for a
part of the endopodite.
(8) The telson of Cruregens and of some other Anthurids is distinctly separated from
the last segment of the pleon, though this is exceptional among the Isopoda.
(9) The genus Crungomjx is discussed at some length, and the mouth-parts of
Crangonyx compactus are described. The mouth-parts of Crangonyx do not appear to
have been previously described.
(10) The pleopoda of Crangonyx compactus have each only one ramus instead of two,
as is almost universally the case in other Amphipoda. It appears to be the inner branch
that is wanting. Nothing appears to be known of tlie pleopoda of most of the other
species of Crangonyx.
(11) The species Gammarus fragilis appears to correspond well with the characters
usually assigned to tlie genus, but it is interesting to note tliat the present species has
very long antennae, perieopoda, and terminal uropoda, thus showing some approach to
the characters of Nlphurgus.
32*
216 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SIJBTEEEANEAN
(12) In CcMiopius svMerraneus there is very great dissimilarity between the two
sexes, cliiefly in the gnathopoda, both of these in the male differing considerably from
those of the female, while in other species one pair is usually almost or quite alike in
the two sexes. There are also differences in some of the mouth-parts, viz. in characters
which are often made use of for generic differentiation.
Some remarks are made on the calceoli found in the males of this species ; they are
also found in some specimens which otherwise resemble the females, but these are looked
upon as immature males which have not yet acquired the peculiar gnathopoda of the
fully-developed male.
V. The General Pauna of the Subterranean Waters of Canterbury.
In addition to the Crustacea described in the present paper there are doubtless many
other forms to be found in the underground waters of the Canterbury Plains. In his
paper on the fauna of the subterranean waters of the North of France, Dr. R. Moniez
[78] gives a very long list, including Protozoa, Coelenterata, Turbellaria, Nematoda,
Annelida, Rotifera, Gasteropoda, and various Crustacea, in addition to the Amphipoda
and Isopoda, viz. Copepoda, Ostracoda, and Cladocera. In the various caves of North
America, as described by Packard [83], and likewise in those of Europe, described
by Joseph [67] and other writers, the fauna is a very extended one, and naturally
includes many air-breathing forms that would be unable to exist in subterranean
waters.
I have made no extended search for other forms from the wells of Canterbury, but in
collecting the Crustacea I have occasionally met with others, and it will perhaps be well
to mention briefly here what is known on the subject, in the hope that greater attention
will be directed to the matter in the future.
Attached to tlie Amphipoda {Crangonyx compactns, Gammarus fragilis, CalUop'ms
stiUerraneus) I have, on several occasions, noticed a small stalked Infusorian, probably
a Vorticella, or something allied thereto. Various worms have been lirought up by the
pump — one, an Oligochsete, is, Professor Haswell tells me, Phreoryctes Smiihii, Beddard ;
another is a very remarkable Turbellarian, which is at present being investigated by
Professor W. A. Haswell, of Sydney.
Mr. W. W. Smith, who has examined the water brought up by pumps in the Ashburton
district with great care and jjerseverance, has succeeded in detecting several forms
that have not yet been observed from the Eyreton wells. Among these are some
small Gasteropoda, a small Centipede, and a jieculiar worm, Phreodrilus subterraneus,
Beddard [8]. The shells have been observed from several wells, but only very few
specimens have as yet been obtained ; these were submitted to Mr. Suter of Christchurch,
who states tliat they appear to be Potamopyrgus anti})odum, Gray, var. spelcBci, Prauenfeld.
P. antipodnm is a freshwater species which is very widely distriliuted in New Zealand,
and has probably received various names for its different varieties ; the type of P. spelcea
was found in the Collingwood Caves near Nelson. There seems no doubt that the shells
found at Ashburton really belong to the true subterranean fauna, as Mr. Suter states
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 247
that they were withovit pig-ment and of a dii'ty white colour, and the animals were still
alive when got from the pump by Mr. Smith, who watched their movements for some
hours before sending them off to Mr. Suter.
The aquatic worm obtained by Mr. Smith Avas forwarded to Mr. F. E. Beddard, who
has described it as " Phreodrilus suhterraneus, nov. gen. et n. sp.," making it the type of
a new family of the Aquatic Oligochaita, viz. the Phreodrilidse [8]. The genus is, he
considers, a very remarkable one, and, in addition to various peculiarities in the internal
anatomy, the character of the seta? is alone sufficient for the creation of a new family.
He regards the Phrcodrilidse as a very low form of Oligochteta, greatly specialized in
certain directions. He adds : — " I should explain that in using the term ' low ' I do not
mean that this genus is in any way near the ancestral form of the Oligochseta. The
simplicity of structure in this and other aquatic genera is rather to be looked upon as
evidence of degeneration." He places the PhreodrilidiB nearer the Naidomorpha than to
any other group of the Oligoehseta, thougli admitting that the position of the genital
organs suggests an atfinity with the Enchytraeidaj. There are also a few points in which
Phreodrilus recalls the higher among the Ohgocha^ta, and Mr. Beddard comes to the
conclusion that " it should be placed some way off the line leading from the more highly-
developed Lumbriculida? to the lower Naidomorpha, but that its precise relationships
require further study, and cannot be determined with any probability of success at the
present time " [8, p. 292].
I have given the above account of Phreodrilus pretty fully because it appears in many
respects to be parallel to the case of Phreotoicus, for which I have had to establish a
new family. The two cases confirm each other, and show how exceedingly interesting
the svibtcrranean fauna really is. No doubt other discoveries quite as interesting as
these will yet repay careful and systematic search, for as yet the ground has been
prospected merely, not thoroughly worked.
Besides animals which, like the above-mentioned, undoubtedly belong to the true
subterranean favma, it appears that surface animals from the neighlwurhood of the wells
may sometimes be obtained through the pump, apparently from the well. Thus I have
several times taken Cijdops novcB-zealandice, G. M. Thomson, from wells at Eyreton.
The specimens were exactly like those found in surface pools in the neighbourhood and
had the eye perfect, and had no doubt got into the well by accident — an accident that
with this small creature might very easily happen. On one occasion Mr. Smith, after
pumping for three quarters of an hour from a well at the Elgin Schoolhouse near
Ashburton, 50 feet deep, and fitted with a cylinder-pump, obtained a spider and a small
Gasteropod shell, and the seeds of some plants. The spider, which has perfect eyes, is,
Mr. Goyen informs me, a species of Theridion frequently found in dark situations, such
as crevices of rocks, &c. The seeds were submitted to Mr. D. Pctrie, who writes that one
belongs to Chenopodimn, which is abundant everywhere in the district. The shell, deter-
mined by Mr. Suter, is Amphij^eplea ampulla, Hutton, a species found everywhere in
creeks, rivers, pools, &c. ; the animal had evidently been dead for some time, as the body
was decayed ; the shell was of the normal horny colour, and, like the spider and the seeds, it
must apparently have got into the pump by some accident, and forms no part of the true
248 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
subterranean fauna. Mr. Suter points out that the shell of this specimen showed no approach
to the dead-white colour of the Potamopyrgus, which is no doubt truly subterranean.
At the same time and from the same pump Mr. Smith obtained one or two specimens
of CalUopius subterraneus.
VI. The Canterbury Plains and their Underground Waters.
All the localities from which subterranean Crustacea have been as yet collected in
New Zealand are situated on the Canterbury Plains, and in order to clear the way for
the discussion of the probable origin of these forms it will be convenient to state first a
few facts about the formation of the plains and as to their underground waters. Much
of what follows is taken from the late Sir Julius von Haast's ' Geology of the Provinces
of Canterbury and Westland, New Zealand ' [53]. In speaking of the plains formed on
the eastern side of the Southern Alps he says : —
" The most prominent amongst these are the Canterbury Plains, which, by their
position, nature, and general characteristics, form a prominent feature of this island, and
are already the centre of a rich, industrious, and large population. They begin at the
dolerite plateau of Timaru, and stretch without interruijtion to Double Corner, iu a
general direction from south-west to north-east, with a length of about 112 miles. Their
breadtli from a few miles at both extremities, north and south, augments as Ave advance
towards their centre, having their greatest lateral extension near Banks Peninsula,
where, in a direction from east to west, they stretch a distance of nearly 50 miles to the
base of the mountains. The Pacific Ocean is their boundary on the eastern side, where
a long shore stretches in a line nearly from south-west to north-east — from Timaru to
Double Corner — being only interrupted by the volcanic system of Banks Peninsula, which
rises so conspicuously in the middle of that low shore, and to the existence of which so
great a portion of the loose strata composing these plains owes its preservation from the
destructive agencies of the waves and currents. The western boundary is formed by
the outrunning spurs of the Southern Alps, having, as I have pointed out previously, by
their disintegration, ofi'ered the material for the present configuration and other physical
features of the plains. In their great bulk they consist of the accumulation of post-
pliocene torrents. Having had their glacier-sources much nearer to Banks Peninsula
than in present times, the latter were able to throw the boulders, shingle, sand, and ooze,
carried along with them, not only in greater masses, but also on steej)er slopes than the
present rivers crossing them can do, for reasons given in the geological portion. These
post-pliocene deposits of large rivers have covered with an almost uniform gradient the
palaeozoic, volcanic, or tertiary rocks composing here the sea-bottom " [53, p. 231].
The Canterbury Plains slope towards the sea at the rate of about 40 feet to the mile
for the first fifteen or twenty miles from the mountains, and at an average of 24 feet to
the mile for the remainder of the distance to the sea. This may be illustrated by the
following figures taken from Sir Julius von Haast's ' Geology ' [53, p. 403], showing the
fall of two of the rivers in the basins of which subterranean Crustacea have been
found : —
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND.
249
Some of the other rivers sliow rather more gradual falls than those quoted in the
tahle ahove ; thus the River Selwyn from its entrance into the plains to its mouth at
Lake Ellesmere has a total fall of 790 feet in a distance of 29 miles, or an average of
27 1 feet per mile.
With regard to the origin of the plains Sir Julius von Haast says : — " All the levels,
surveys, engineering works, together with Avell-sinking, have amply confirmed my views
that the Canterbury Plains are of fluviatile origin, that, with the exception of some
morainic accumulation in the upper portion and the drift sands round Banks
Peninsula, and tlie partial laciistrine deposits filling the former extension of Lake
Ellesmere, the whole of the plains were formed by huge rivers issuing from tlie frontal
end of gigantic glaciers" [53, p. 396]. Consequently the Canterbury Plains consist of
river shingle and sand, cemented more or less by a ferruginous matrix ; this has been
proved by the sinking of wells in many directions on the Plains, some of them to con-
siderable depths. In a well between the Ashburton and Rakaia, " where a supply of
water was reached at a depth of 220 feet, the shingle at the bottom became much
cleaner and incoherent, resembling the small shingle in the Rakaia river-bed "
[53, p. 473].
All over the plains water is found at a greater or less depth below the surface, the depth
varying according to the locality, the dryness of the season, the condition of neigh-
bouring rivers, &c. In a great many places this water is found within about 30 feet of
the surface, and can hence be brought up by suction-pumps ; in some cases, however, as
in the one quoted above, water is not found until a depth of 200 feet or more is
reached. These underground waters can percolate through the river-shingle of which
the plains are composed with considerable freedom ; thus whenever a hole is dug to the
water-bearing stratum, it is quickly filled by the water running in from the shingle all
around : the various wells at Eyreton, again, are quickly aflfccted by the state of the river
Eyre, which is from one to three or more miles distant from them ; thus if the water in
these wells has sunk owing to drought when the river continues dry, it quickly rises
again when the river is in flood. Evidently a considerable qviantity of the water of the
Eyre and of other rivers flowing across the Canterbury Plains must leak away through the
250 DR. C. CHILTOJS ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
loose sand and shingle in their beds, and go to supply tlie subterranean waters. The
Canterbury rivers are so rapid and so frequently in flood that they are continually washing^
away parts of their beds, and thus opening up a way for the water to escape through the
loose shingle thus exposed, and there is no opportunity given for such openings to be
permanently closed by the finer sediment brought down by the rivers. It frequently
happens that in the bed of the river Eyre, some five or ten miles above East Eyreton,
towards the source of the river, there is a considerable quantity of water, while the
whole of this, except of coiu'se that lost by evaporation, sinks into the ground before
Eyreton is reached, so tliat there the river-bed is quite dry.
The subterranean Avatcrs, instead of being evenly spread over a whole district, often no
doubt form more or less distinct streams, and probably different streams arising from
diifei'ent sources may be found one below another ; thus Mr. Smith says that in the
sections of the Canterbury Plains exposed at the mouths of the llangitata and Ashburton
rivers, siibterraneau streams may be seen to flow out at various heights in considerable
volume and force. These difl'erent streams are no doubt separated by harder and more
impervious strata, and they will have different sources ; some of them will, perhaps,
obtain their supply of water from the leakage that takes place at the foot of the hills
owing to the break of the continuity of the strata of the plain.
In his Presidential Address to Section E at the Christchurch Meeting of the
Australasian Association, Mr. G. S. Griffiths [52] has given a number of facts about the
subterranean waters of a part of Australia which it will be interesting to compare with
what we know of those of Canterbury. Speaking of the artesian weUs which are being
sunk on the back blocks from the centre of Queensland doT\Ti towards the mouth of the
Murray, he says : — "The chief sources of these water-supplies must be looked for in the
great eastern cordillera, which sheds the surface streams that also cross Riverina. Along
its crests the rainfall is of course greatest, being from 20 in. to 10 in. per amium iu the
Queensland portion ; and it is near to the long ribbon-shaped region of heaviest rainfall
— that is, along the sides of the watershed — that the superficial deposits, being largely
composed of gravel and rock debris, are most pervious. Further, the continuity of the
strata of the plains is broken at the hill-foot, where they die out against the outcropping
rocks of the main range, and this line of break affords to the water flowing down the
hills a ready passage beneath the sediments of the plains.
" Under these circumstances a large proportion of the rain caught on the ranges leaks
under the subsoil directly it falls, and it flows to the sea slowly indeed, but with its
volume undiminished either by the evaporation which lowers the surface waters of the
Riverina G ft. per annum, or by the demands of vegetation, which are much greater upon
river-water than the public has any idea of.
" As these subterranean waters travel away from their sources they must thin out. . . .
But it apjiears to me that in every district of any size there must be decider channels in
that ancient land-surface which is now the bed-rock or reef of the miner
" These underground watei'coiu'ses, or, as the miner would describe thein, these wet
leads, will run out into the plains for greater distances than a hundred miles. Indeed,
when we remember that the streams are undiminished by evaporation or the demands of
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 251
vegetation, and that they have been the recipients of all the leakage of the hills throughout
all the ages that have passed since the sea retired, it appears to me that the deeper leads
must be saturated with water right through from the mountain-foot to the Australian
Bight. Eor, however slow the circulation of the system may be, as the water has never
ceased to run in at the upper ends of the region, and as it does not rise to the surface as
springs, it must run out at the lower end into the sea, escaping in the form of submarine
springs. As a matter of fact, along the south coast of Australia, between Warrnambool
and the Murray mouth, the sea literally bubbles up Avith fresh water which has leaked
up through the sea-sands " [52, pp. 235, 236].
Doubtless a large portion of the deeper underground waters of the Canterbury Plains
escapes into the sea in the same way by submarine springs, for in many cases they are
known to be much below the sea-level. Thus the water-bearing stratum that suj)plies
the ordinary artesians of Christchurch is, at the coast at New Brighton, 13G feet below
the surface, and there is another stratum below at about twice that depth [03, p. 33].
Other portions of these underground waters in Canterbury rise to the surface, before
reaching the sea, as springs, like those which form the source of the river Avon near
Ckristchurcb.
Facts like those quoted above from Mr. Griffith's address, and the Avidespread distri-
bution of the subterranean genus Nipharyus in Europe, and of the closely-aUied genus
Crangonyx in North America and elsewhere, remind us of what might otherwise be
overlooked, viz. the universality and great extent of underground w^aters. An instructive
example is given by Wallace in his ' Malay Arcliipelago ' : —
"The little island of Kilwaru is a mere sandbank, just large enough to contain a small
village, and situated lietween the islands of Ceram-laut and Kissa — straits about a tliii'd
of a mile wdde separating it from each of them. It is surrounded by coral-reefs, and
offers good anchorage in both monsoons. Though not more than fifty yards across,
and not elevated more than three or four feet above the highest tides, it has wells of
excellent drinking-water — a singular phenomenon, which would seem to imply deep-
seated subterranean channels connecting it with other islands " [114, pp. 375-6].
Many similar facts have been brought to light in connection with the boring of artesian
wells, and some of these will be found collected in Lyell's ' Principles of Geology ' [76,
vol. i. p. 385 (fcc], where it is shown not only that the underground waters extend to
great depths, often far below the level of the ocean, but that various distinct sheets of
water may be met with, one below another, five distinct sheets having been intersected
in a well at St. Ouen, in Prance [76, vol. i. ]). 3b9]. Lyell also gives some examples
showing that there are often open passages by which the subterranean waters circulate.
Thus, in a well at Tours, from a depth of 364 feet, there were brought up a freshwater
shell, some land species, some seeds of plants and other vegetable matter, all of W'hich, it
was supposed, had flowed from some valleys of Auvergne or Vivarais, distant about 150
miles, since the preceding autumn. After giving other examples of a similar kind, Lyell
says, " we see evidence of the water not having been simiily filtered through porous rock,
but having flowed through continuous underground channels. Such examples suggest
the idea that the leaky beds of rivers are often the feeders of springs " [76, vol. i. p. 31)1].
SECOM) SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 33
252 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
Professor Porol, in considering the origin of the blind Niphargtis Forelii and AselUis
-Fo?r^M, comes to the conclusion that they have originated, not in the lakes themselves, but
in the underground waters, and he gives various interesting facts showing the commu-
nication that must exist between these waters and the deep waters of the lakes [40,
pp. 182-183 &c.]. The same thing is found in North America, for some of the blind
cave-species, Ccecidotcea stygia for example, are obtained from wells in various districts,
showing that they exist widely spread in the underground waters, and not merely in the
caves themselves. It is possible that some of the species, perhaps Ccecklotcea stygia, may
have originated in the underground waters, and not actually in the caves, thus forming
an exact parallel to the case of Asellus Forelii in the Swiss lakes.
It will not be necessary to bring forward any additional facts to show that there must
be abundant opportunities by which specimens of the freshwater fauna of any country
might be carried into the underground waters which almost everywhere exist, and thus
have a chance of giving rise to subterranean species.
In the case of the Canterbury Plains, the subterranean waters have almost everywhere
sunk several feet further from the surface of the land during recent years, owins: to a
succession of exceptionally dry seasons. Thus at Eyreton the level of the water has
sunk on an average about 10 or 12 feet ; Miss Young tells me that it has sunk also at
Winchester, and that the well there, from which subterranean Crustacea have been
obtained, has had to be deepened, and it will be seen from the following interesting
account, prepared by Mr. W. W. Smith, that the lowering of the water has been very
marked at Ashburton : —
" Previous to the years 1890 and 1891 no lowering or discoloration of the subterranean
water was observed on the plains, at least there are no records of such existing. The
water in the pipe-wells and in the outflowing streams at the base of the terraces of the
Ashburton river, and also in the surface springs on the plains, remained constant at all
seasons and perfectly pure. As the drought increased, the Avater in the pipe-wells
lowered, and left tliem all, with one exception, dry. Near one house a large surface
spring rose in a small gully, and discharged a heavy flow of cool pure water. It began to
diminish in volume in October 1890, and by the December following it had ceased to
flow. The terrace springs, situated 25 feet lower, held out several m onths longer, and they
in turn gradu.ally became dry. Half a mile below Ashburton a large strong-flowing
spring exists right in the river-bed ; it is distant about a quarter of a mile from the
nearest terrace, and situated 12 feet below it. It flows out of a partially conglomerated
bed of small stones and clay, and unquestionably belongs to a lower stratum or stream
of water than those supplying the pipe-wells in tlie town. The water in this spring is
never affected in volume or colour by the flooding of the river, but retains its purity at
all seasons. The nearest terrace is 12 feet above it, and is composed chiefly of clay. It
is only a few feet above the stratum of water which supplies the wells in the town.
Before the drought several springs arose at the base of the terrace, none of which, nor
any of the surface-springs, have at present recommenced to flow.
" I may mention that Mr. W. P. Dolman, a practical well-sinker in business here,
informed me that there is no question about the water flowing between the various strata
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 253
or irregular beds of shingle and sand composing tlie plains, at least in the Asliburtoa
district. Some of the beds are intensely hard and extremely difficult to pierce with the
steel-pointed pipes. After the lowering of the water, Mr. Dolman ascertained when
driving the pipes to unusual depths that the pipe frequently entered ' dry-beds,' and he
had either to draw up or lower the pipe to tap the water. The deepest well he has
driven is 65 feet, and it has continued to give a good flow ever since it was driven.
Mr. Dolman states that there is no limit, so far as he knows, to the depth the vrater is
found in the plains, although it flows in thinner or shallower streams the lower he sinks.
Eeferring to the discoloration of some streams, he informed me that he has found small
round particles of clay in the water, and he attributes its discoloration to these floating
particles. When sinking open w'ells, Mr. Dolman has occasionally observed the direction
and rate at which the subterranean water flows. He estimates its motion at from one-
quarter to one-half a mile an hour. One important fact he has several times ascertained,
when driving the pipes through the lower and harder beds, is the rising of the w^ater in
the pipe to variovis heights from the newly-taj^ped stream. He has known it to rise
from 2 fett to 14 feet, and afterwards to remain permanent. There is considerable
difference in the work of sinking the various wells — some are put dow^n in a few hours,
the pipes driving freely, and others require as many days, and this sometimes with a
heavier 'monkey ' at work. These facts can be better studied by an examination of the
high sections of the plains at the mouths of the Kangitata and the Ashburton Elvers.
" The exceptional well I have mentioned, which did not become dry, is driven 27 feet,
and is in a low-lying part of the town. Nearly all the pipe-wells originally driven were
sunk to various depths, ranging from 15 feet to 22 feet. These, without any exception,
became di"y."
VII. Origin of the Subtekranean Crustacea.
In considering the source from which the subterranean Crustacea have been derived, it
will be well to state first what little is known of the freshwater forms of the Amphipoda
and Isopoda found in New Zealand and Austraha.
In New Zealand only one freshwater Isopod is known, Idotea lacustris, G. M. Thomson
[21, p. 263], and this one has no connection whatever with the subterranean fauna. In
Australia, however, a species of Fhreutoicm is known, P. mistralis [26], as yet found
only on the top of Mt. Kosciusko, about 6000 feet above the sea. In the Amphipoda
we have two freshwater species recorded from New Zealand. One, Callioinus fluviatiUs,
is very common in almost all running streams of the South Island ; but is also found in
various places in Otago Harbour, in water that is quite salt. This species is very abun-
dant in the surface-streams of the Canterbury Plains, in the localities wdiere the subter-
ranean forms also abound ; but, as I have already pointed out, although it approaches
Calliopius subterraneus, it is dissimilar in several respects, and it does not seem at all
likely that C. subterraneus is directly descended from it. The other species is Pherusa
ccerulea, G. M. Thomson [107, p. 206], found by Mr. Thomson on the top of the Old Man
Range, 3000 feet, in Otago, and as yet known from this locality only. I have compared
this S2)ecies in some detail with Calliojnus subterraneus (see above, p. 235), and have
33*
254 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
shown that in many points the resemhlance is very great, and that most prohably
Pherusa ccernlea and Calliopms suhterraneus are both descended from a species formerly
A\ddely sj)read in New Zealand.
This is all that is as yet knoAvn of the freshwater Amphipoda and Isopoda ; but it must
be remembered that our knowledge of the subject is very imperfect, and that careful
search of other streams, especially in the mountainous parts, will probably reveal other
forms. As an example, I may mention that until lately Idotea lacustris was known
only from the Tomahawk Lagoon near Dunedin, a lagoon situated very close to the sea ;
I have, however, since collected a variety of the same species in great abundance in the
streams, up to a height of about 1000 feet, around Mt. Mihiwaka, between Port Chalmers
and Blueskin, as well as in streams some five or six miles distant, and on the other side of
the Waitati valley [21, p. 263]. In the same situations I have also taken another
Ampliipod, at present undescribed ; this, however, appears to belong to the genus
Mycdella, and throws no light on the origin of any of the subterranean forms.
No freshwater Amphipoda have been described from Australia, but in January 1892
Mr. Thomson collected two species on Mt. Wellington, near Hobart, Tasmania, and
examples of both species have since been kindly supplied to me by Mr. Alex. Morton, of
the Tasmanian Museum. They are being examined by Mr. Thomson and have not yet
been fully worked out. One is a rather large species, and seems to belong to NipJmrgus
in its general structure and in the uropoda, though the terminal uropoda are not very
long. The other species, which is smaller, and comes from the top of Mt. Wellington,
about 4000 feet high, also seems to aj)proach very closely to Niphargus, though very
different from the preceding species in general appearance ; it closely resembles that
species in the antennse, the mouth-parts, and the gnathopoda, which are subequal, and
have the propodos subquadrate, as in most species of Niphargus ; the telson also is deeplj
cleft, not double, and bears stout spines on the hinder margin of each lobe, as in Niphargus ;
the body, however, is not slender, but rather compact, and the third uropods, though
consisting of a very small inner branch and a longer two-jointed outer branch, are not
elongated, and the second joint of the outer branch is very small, so that in these respects
the animal resembles Crangonyx rather than Niphargus. It is, however, very different
from Crangonyx compactus in the gnathopoda, the side-plates, the base of the perseopoda
and the pleopoda, and of course also in the telson. However, the species presents a
nearer approach to both Niphargus and Crangonyx than any form at present found in
the surface-streams of Europe, and it is interesting, because it shows the wide distribution
of forms similar to those from which Niphargus and Crangonyx must have been derived *.
The question of the origin of the subterranean Crustacea has from the first given rise
to much discussion and to the most diverse opinions. Unfortunately, too, the question
has been obscured by some of the conclusions being based on insufficient facts, and by
some of the facts themselves being at first incorrectly stated, as, for example, the
affinities of CcBcidotcea.
The explanation that most readily offers itself is that the subterranean Crustacea are
* This species Mr. Thomson has named NijiJiai-gus montanus, sp. nov. ; the one previously mentioned he calls
Nipliargus Morioni, sp. nov., though he tells me he does not feel satisfied about placing it in the genus Nipharr/ics.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 255
direct descendants from those now living in fresh waters on the surface of the earth.
This view has hcen strongly upheld hy some — by Fries, among others — and appeared to
receive some support from the fact that specimens of Gammarus fossa rum, kept in
darkness during the winter, lost to some extent the pigment of the eyes, thus showing
some approach to the blind Niphargl. I shall refer to this again later on.
Others, again, confining their attention more particularly to the special affinities of one
or two genera of the subterranean Crustacea, have pointed out that, in place of being-
allied to freshwater forms, they more closely resemble marine forms, some of which are
inhabitants of deep water. Thus Spence Bate states that Niphargus resembles the
marine Eriopis much more than the freshwater Gammarus [i, p. 311], and that Crau-
gonyx appears to have its nearest ally in the marine Gammarella [4, p. 326]. This
resemblance of the subterranean forms to members of the marine fauna appeared
at first to receive some confirmation from the unfortunate name Ccecklotcea [81]
given to the blind Isopods from the North-American caves, and from the mistaken
ideas as to its affinities ; and, misled by this and by the very impei-fect kno\^'-
ledge of the freshwater Crustacea of New Zealand, I have also stated that the subter-
ranean Crustacea of New Zealand appeared to have been derived from a marine source
[23, p. 88]. No doubt the subterranean Crustacea, as well as the freshwater forms, have
originally sprung from forms inhabiting the sea, but from the fuller array of facts now
before us there can be no doubt that they have not been derived directly from these,
but from a freshwater fauna. Niphargus and Crangonyx may, perhaps, show affinities to
marine forms, and there certainly does not appear to be any closely-allied form now
inhabiting the surface fresh waters of Europe ; but in North America various species of
Crangonyx are found in surface-streams, &c., and the fact that a closely-allied form is
found in the fresh waters of Tasmania seems to show that the genus has probably been
at one time widely spread in the freshwaters of the globe. Ccpcidotcea is really a very
close ally of the freshwater Asellus, species of which are found in the streams of both
Europe and North America, Avith representative subterranean forms in both places.
Professor S. I. Smith, in view of the fact that the Crustaceans have several times been
referred to as indicating the partially marine origin of the cave-fauna of the Western
States of North America, has considered their affinities in detail, and points out that,
looking at the Crustaceans alone, there is " no reason for supposing that the fauna of the
caves of Kentucky and Indiana has been derived from any other source than the recent
fauna of the surface of the neighbouring region" [104]. The fuller knowledge that we
now possess forces us to a somewhat similar conclusion with regard to the subterranean
fauna of New Zealand, though here our knowledge is not so complcite. The New-
Zealand forms at present known are six in number — Gammarus fragilis, Crangonyx
compactus, CalUop'ms suhterraneus, Cruregens fontanus, Phreatoicus typicus, and
Ph7-eatoicus assimllis ; and if we consider in turn the freshwater allies of tliese, we find
the following facts : — No freshwater species of Gammarzis is known from New Zealand
or Australia as yet, l)ut the genus is one very widely distributed and has freshwater
species in other parts of the world ; Crangonyx, as has been already pointed out, appears
to be exclusively confined to fresh water, species are known either from surface-streams
25(5 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
or from caves and wells in England {C.subterraneus), Italy {C. imngens). North America
{C. gracilis, C. viireus, &c.), Kamtschatka {C. Evmanni), New Zealand (C. compactus),
and a form more or less closely allied still inhabits the fresh waters of Tasmania ;
Callioplus subterraneus appears to have its nearest ally in Pherusa ccsrulea, found in a
stream ou the top of mountains 3000 feet high in Otago, New Zealand, while another
species {CalUopius fluviatilis), which perhaps belongs to the same genus, is very abundant
in the freshwater streams of the South Island of New Zealand ; no freshwater form at
all approaching Cruregens is as yet known ; besides the two subterranean species, the
only other known ^T^eciQs, oi Phreatoicus is found on the top of the Mt. Kosciusko Plateau
in Australia, living in pools and streams.
It will thus be seen that there is no difficulty in supposing that the subterranean fauna
of New Zealand has been derived directly from a freshwater fauna, and when we consider
the affinities of the general fauna of the North-American caves as given by Packard [83],
or of the various Euroi^ean caves, there can no longer be any doubt that the cave- and
well-fauna has been derived from the surface-fauna of the neiohbourhood.
While this conclusion thus appears to be well founded, it by no means foUows that the
subterranean fauna is necessarily derived from the freshwater fauna at present inhabiting
the surface-streams and lakes ; indeed there are several facts which seem to show that
some species at any rate are derived from a more ancient surface-fauna. Thus, while
the subterranean species Asellus cavaticus may perhaps be the direct descendant of
the surface-species A. aquaticus, there is no doubt that Niphargus is not a mere
modified form of any of the surface-inhabiting Gammari at present found in Europe.
Wrze^niowski has clearly pointed out that experiments like those made by Eries and
observations on pale forms of Gammarus found in mines, &c., like the one described by
Schneider, do not bear on the question, for the specimens approach Niphargus only in
the pale body and in the partial loss of the eyes while still retaining the general build
and characteristic mouth-parts, &c., of Gammarus. As to the actual origin of Gammarus
and Niphargus we are, he says, quite in the dark ; but he is of opinion that neither is
derived from the other, but both from a common ancestor. Humbert had previously
come to much the same conclusion and is of opinion that Nlpjhargus is an ancient
genus derived from a form now extinct.
The Crayfish inhabiting the caves of North America also appear to be more ancient
than those at pi'esent found in the surface-water of the neighbourhood. Speaking of
Cambarus pelluciihis. Professor Eaxon says it " is a very aberrant species, with no very
closely related form outside the cave. The simple form of the male appendages, and the
combination of characters belonging to different groups, seen in C. pellucidtis, indicate,
to my mind, that it is a very ancient form, which has been preserved in the seclusion
of the cave, whilst its nearest kin supcumbed in the sharper struggle incident to life
outside, or were replaced by modified descendants evolved to meet the changeable con-
ditions which obtain witliout the caverns " [37, p. •^"1].
This view is, he says, confirmed by the fact that the same form, C. pellucidus, is found
in caves on both sides of that ancient river, the Ohio, and by the discovery by Gustav
Joseph of a species of Cambarus in the caves of Carniola in Southern Austria. As the
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 257
present Crayfish of Europe belong to a different genus, Astucus, Professor Faxon looks
upon the existence of a Cambarus in the Carniolan eaves (if the species really belongs to
that genus) as evidence of the former existence of the genus Cambarus in the rivers of
Europe [37, p. 42]. In connection witli the latter point it is as well to mention that
Packard has stated that Joseph's species, Cambarus sf/jgius, is based only on a single di'y
specimen from one cave and remains of the forceps of another specimen from another
cave, and that " it seems premature to draw conclusions from such limited facts " [83,
p. 119, footnote].
Passing on to the NcAv-Zealand forms we find that although six species are
known from the underground waters of the Canterbury Plains, only one, Calliopius
■fluviatills, G. M. Thomson, is found in the surface-waters of the neighbourhood, and
that this species, though allied to some extent to Calliopius subterraueus, is dissimilar in
several points, and certainly not so close to it as is Thernsa ccerulea*. It would there-
fore seem that the subterranean forms are more ancient than the present surface-fauna
of the Canterbury Plains ; and this is confirmed by the fact that their nearest allies are
found in remote situations. Thus Fherusa ccerulea, the nearest ally of Calliopius sub-
terraneus, is known only from one situation on the top of a mountain between 200 and
300 miles distant ; no allies of Gammarus fragilis nor of Cruregens fontanus are known
from the fresh waters of the southern hemispliere ; Crangonyx compaetus has its nearest
allies in Europe and North America; while Phreatoicus, Avhich is proved to be an
ancient form by the possession of characters common to several ftimilies, appears to have
been preserved only in the subterranean waters of New Zealand and on the top of
Mt. Kosciusko in Australia.
Although it is thus probably true that some species of the subterranean fauna are
ancient forms that have long since taken up their abode in the vmderground waters, we
should naturally expect to find others, especially in the fauna of caves, that have much
more lately adopted a cave life and are the direct descendants of surface-species still in-
habiting the neighbourhood. Such specimens we undoubtedly do find, and they appear
also to show several stages or transitions from surface-forms accidentally carried into the
caves up to true cave-inhabiting forms. Thus in the caves of America among others
the surface-forms Cambarus Bartonil [83, p. 40] and Asellns communis [83, p. 33] have
been found, the specimens of these being more or less bleached and much jialer in colour
than the ordinary surface-forms ; again, the cave Myriopod Pseudotremia cavernarum is,
Packard says, only a modified form of the widely diffused Lysiopetalmn lactarium, Say,
and various other examples of the same kind are also to be found in Packard's work.
In the same way Schneider has described a subterranean variety of Gammarus pulex,
found in mines at Clausthal, which diff'ers from the normal forms of that genus in its
pale colour, the partial degeneration of the eye, and the lengthening of the anterior
antennae [96]. Mouiez also has found in the reservoir at Emmerin in the north of France
a single specimen of a Gammarus which has been modified in much the same way as the
* I have already pointed out, p. 234, that CalUophis sahterranem should 'perhaps be transferred to Pherusa, but
that for the present I have left it in the genus in which it was originally placed, as the limits of these two and other
allied genera appear to me to need fre^li and careful definition.
258 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEKEANEAN
variety described by Sckneider, forming to some extent a link between this variety and the
surface-type, though approaching again towards Gammarus fluviatiUs, while Schneider's
variety seems to come from Gaiimiarus pulex [78, p. 40]. These examples are sufficient
to make it clear that the subterranean fauna of any country is not always to he looked
upon as a whole, but that the different species have in many cases adopted the subter-
ranean life at different times, and that under favourable cii-cumstances the subterranean
forms may even at the present time be reinforced by immigrants from the surface. It
is, however, obvious that transitional forms of the kind spoken of above will be much
more common in caves than in underground waters, for the means of entrance will
usually be greater, and immigrants from the surface will have to struggle with the forms
that have already become adapted to a subterranean life, and will hence find it difficult
to establish themselves unless they should happen to be carried into regions not already
])eopled. This is probably the reason why the subterranean Amphipod fauna of Europe
is so fixed in character and uniform as it is, and why the subterranean species sometimes
belong to such ancient forms.
In the case of the New-Zealand forms it is rather rash to speculate, but, considering
the similarity of conditions all over the Canterbury Plains and the fact that aU the
known species, with the exception of Phreatoicus assimtUs, are found together in the
same stratum of water at Eyreton, it seems probable that all the forms adopted the sub-
terranean life at about the same time, and that they are not now being reinforced by
fi*esh immigrants from the surface. This is not for want of opportunities (for I have
shown above, on p. 249 et seq., that there are doubtless many ways by which the surface-
forms can gain access to the underground waters), but because the surface-fauna from
which the subterranean forms were derived no longer exists in its entirety. If it stiU
exists at all it will doubtless be found preserved in mountainous situations in the same
way as Pherusa ccsrulea and Phreatoicus cmstralis.
The deep-water fauna of the sea and especially of freshwater lakes presents many
resemblances to the subterranean fauna. The deep-water fauna of the Swiss Lakes, as
described by Professor E(3rel [40], is particularly interesting in this connection, as it
contains two species at least which also belong to the subterranean fauna, viz. Niphargus
Forelii (= N. putemius, Koch, var. Forelii, Humbert) and Aselhis Forelii, Blanc. In
considering the origin of this deep-water fauna Professor Porel comes to the conclusion
that the greater part of it is derived from the littoral fauna of the lakes themselves, the
animals having descended to greater or less depths, and having become more or less
modified accordingly, and he also points out that every year new immigrants come to
renew the deep-water fauna, just as ^ve saw probably happens with the cave-fauna. With
regard to the two species mentioned above, however, the case is difi'ereut, and after a
very long and full discussion of the whole problem [40, pp. 170-183] he decides that
these come, not from the littoral fauna, but from the subterranean fauna that is so wide-
spread throughout Europe. This confirms the conclusion of Humbert, WrzesnioAVski,
and others, that Niphargus is not the direct descendant of Gammarus pulex of the
surface. The latter species is found in the littoral fauna of the lakes and sometimes
extends to deep water; but though it may Jbe somewhat modified as regards colour, eyes, &c.,
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 259
it still preserves the distinguisliing marks of Gammarus and shows no approach in
structure to ]Sij)liargtis. Professor Forel points out that there mvist be means of com-
munication— not necessarily permanent — between the subterranean waters and the deep
waters of the lakes and also between the subterranean waters of different localities, thus
fully confirming what I had already -wTitten above pn p. 258 before I had read
Professor Porel's remarks on the subject.
VIII. The Special Characteristics of the Subterranean Fauna.
The special conditions of cave- and well-life and the peculiarities of the subterranean
fauna have been discussed more or less elaborately by many authors, and a complete
dissertation on the subject would require a volume to itself. All that can be done here
is to mention a few j)oints upon which information is supplied by the six subterranean
Crustacea described in this paper. The subject has been fully discussed by Schiodte,
Joseph, and Packard; and Forel has considered the conditions of life in the deep waters
of the Swiss Lakes, the fauna of which presents many analogies to that of the under-
ground waters.
Colour.
The effect of the absence of light on the colour of all animals living in caves and
in underground waters seems to be very uniform, all such permanent residents being
bleached and colourless. Speaking of the inhabitants of caves, Packard says : —
" As regards change of colour, we do not recall an exception to the general law, that
all cave-animals are either colourless or nearly white, or, as in the case of Arachnida and
insects, much paler than their out-of-door relatives " [83, p. 117].
The same statement might be made concerning the inhabitants of underground waters,
different authors speaking of them as " colourless," "snow-white," " translucent," &c. The
Crustacea are usually more or less translucent, vitreous, and pellucid, though by no means
so much so as pelagic members of the same group. The six species dealt with in this
paper may be described as white or colourless, more or less translucent. I have sometimes
noticed a slight pink or rosy tint on the body of CaUlopins subterraneus, which is most
apparent in female specimens bearing eggs, and then appears to arise chiefly from the yolk
of the eggs themselves ; the " liver "-tubes of Cruregens fonkmus, which can easily be
seen through the transparent integument, are of a very pale yellow colour, and the tip
of the dactylos of the first pair of appendages of the peraeou (gnathopoda) is of a very
distinct but light bro^\Ti.
The subterninean worm Phreodrilus subterraneus, Beddard, is stated by Mr. Smith
(quoted by Beddard [8, \}. 273]) to be " fleshy red " during life. This is chiefly due to
the red colour of the fluid in the various vessels of the vascular system, the integument
and the greater part of the body being colourless ; this was plainly seen in a very fine
specimen that Mr. Smith kindly sent alive to me in September 1892.
Professor S. I. Smith has pointed out that the deep-sea Crustacea present a marked
contrast to cave Crustacea in colour. In a general account of the Crustacea of the
SECOND series. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 31
260 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
' Albatross ' dredgings in 1883 [105] lie points out that the colour of these deep-sea forms
is very striking. A few are nearly colourless, hut the majority are some shade of
red or orange. A few species (100 to 300 fathoms) are conspicuously marked with
scarlet or vermilion, but such markings were not noticed in any species from below
1000 fathoms. Below this, orange-red of varying intensity is apparently the most
common colour. He also shows that some of the species ranging down to 2000 fathoms
possess eyes, some of them as well developed as in corresponding shallow-water forms.
Summing up these facts he says : —
" However strong may be the arguments of the physicists against the possibility of
light penetrating the depths from which these animals come, the colour and the structure
of their eyes, as compared with blind cave-dwelling species, show conclusively that the
darkness beneath 2000 fathoms of water is very different from that of ordinary caverns.
While it may be possible that this modification of the darkness of the ocean abysses is
due to phosphorescence of the animals themselves, it does not seem probable that it is
■wholly due to this cause " [105, p. 56].
I wished to test this conclusion by studying the colour of animals found in the
deep waters of lakes, such as tliose of Switzerland, but, unfortunately, the facts that I
find ready to hand are not very conclusive either way. In considering the modifications
undergone by the deep-water species, Forel says under the head " Pigmentation " : —
" La couleur est generalement plus claire dans les especes littorales " [40, p. 167].
He also states that Du Plessis has noticed a rosy colour in some Turbellarians from the
deep waters, which is not found in those of the littoral region. There does not, however,
appear to be a prevailing red or orange tint at all comparable to that which has been
noticed by Smith in deep-water marine Crustacea, or special attention would have been
drawn to it by Porel ; but, again, the species of Crustacea found in the deep waters of
the Swiss Lakes are very few in number compared with those in the deep waters of the
sea, and there are none of the larger forms like those examined by Smith, so that there
is scarcely a sufficient basis for a comparison of any value. Porel describes Niphargus
Forelii as " blanchatre avec des teintes rosees," and Asellus Forelii as " d'un blanc
grisatre, sale" [40, pp. 112, 113].
On the whole, however, the colour of the animals in the deep waters of the Swiss
Lakes appears to resemble that of the animals in caves and underground waters rather
than that of the inhabitants of the deep waters of the ocean ; and this would incline
us to imagine that the difference in colour between the two last-mentioned is due to
some differences of chemical composition rather than to the presence or absence of
light.
Loss of Eyes.
In all animals inhabiting caves and underground waters the eyes appear to undergo
more or less degeneration. Schneider has described the commencement of such
degeneration in Gammarus pulex, var. suhterraneus [96], and in Asellus aquaticus, var.
freihergensis [97], and Moniez in Gammarus fluviatilis, var. d'Emmerin [78, p. 39].
Packard, who has considered the subject very fully in connection with the inhabitants
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 261
of the North-American ca\ es, in which all stages of degeneration are met with, thus
sums up the effects of the loss of sight on the eyes and optic lohes : —
"1. Total atrophy of optic lobes and optic nerves, with or without the persistence in
part of the pigment or retina and the crystalline lens {Ccecidotcea, Cmngonyx, Chthonius,
Adelops, Pseudotremia).
" 2. Persistence of the optic lohes and optic nerves, but total atrophy of the rods and
cones, retina (pigment), and facets {Ovonectes).
"3. Total atrophy of the optic lobes, optic nerves, and all the optic elements,
including rods and cones, retina (pigment), and facets {Anophthalmus, Scoterpes, and
? AntJirobia) " [83, p. 118].
He also points out that Ave never find any rudiments of the optic lobes and optic
nerves ; if they are wanting at all they are totally abolished ; while, " on the other hand,
we have series, as in CcBcldolcea or Chthonius, where there is but a single, or two or
three, or several crystalline lenses, partially enveloped in pigment " [83, p. 118]. He
lays stress on these facts as opposed to what he calls the " invariably slow action involved
in pure Darwinism."
Many conflicting statements have been made by different authors as to the presence
or absence of the eyes of the European species Niphargiis puteanus, and in consequence
it was fully investigated by Leydig, who found " that the optic ganglion is present, but
not the eye, though j)igment-spots mimicking the eye have led some observers to believe
that an eye existed in fact " [quoted from Stebbing, 108, p. 481].
While this may no doubt be quite true of the specimens observed by Leydig, it
appears from Packard's results that the external eye may be represented in varying
degrees of completeness in different specimens of the same sj)L'cies ; and that being so,
there is no ground for refusing to believe that it may be altogether absent in some,
though present (more or less imperfectly) in others. Porel, too, has pointed out that the
blindness of Asellus Forelii, Blanc, is not without exception ; two specimens taken near
Merges and Ouchy, at depths of 200 m. and 300 m., presented rudiments of eyes, whilst
all other specimens taken up to that time — even young taken from the brood-pouch of
the female — were absolutely devoid of eyes [40, p. 114]. We can hardly suppose that
Forel was deceived by mimicking pigment-spots in these two specimens only.
In the New Zealand subterranean Crustacea I have not been able to find any external
trace of eyes except in the one species Crangonyx compactus, in which the eye is repre-
sented by two or three imperfect lenses apparently quite v/ithout pigment. In all the other
species all trace of external eyes appears to be wanting. I regret that as yet I have had
no opportunity of making sections to study the condition of the optic lobes and nerves.
Compensation for Loss of Eyesight.
Several authors have pointed out that in many species inhabiting the dark regions of
caves or underground waters the loss of eyesight has been more or less compensated
for by increased powers in the other senses — especially those of touch and smeU. Many
of the species are more slender and possess longer antennae, legs, and other appendages
34*
262 DR- C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
than their surface-dwelling allies. In some cases the increased length of the antennae,
&c., would no doubt give greater tactile power ; but it also appears probable that, in the
case of species living in underground waters, the greater slenderness of the body has
been acquired in order to adapt the animal for its life in the restricted spaces betw een
the stones and shingle in which it has to live. This explanation is strongly suggested
by a comparison of the two subterranean species of Phreatoicm with the surface-species
P. australis.
The whole subject of the compensation for the loss of eyesight has been fully
discussed by Packard [83, pp. 123-130], who has supplemented the anatomical descrip-
tions with an account of what is known of the habits of some of the species. To this
account I must refer the reader, and I shall only add here the few facts bearing on the
same question that I have observed in the New-Zealand specie s.
In the two species of Phreatoiciis, P. typicus and P. assimUis, the body is more slender
and the antennae and legs longer, especially in P. typicus, than in the surface-species
P. ausiralis, but I have not observed any marked increase in the number or size of the
olfactory rods, nor have I observed any other sensory setae like those found in some of
the other species.
In Cruregens fontanus the antennae are well supplied with olfactory rods, which
appear to be more numerous and of greater length than in allied eyed species ; besides
these, other sensory setae, like the " soies auditives" described by Sars, are found in
considerable abundance on the antennae, the various joints of the legs, and the urojioda.
Similar setae are found in the same places in eyed species of AntJiura, Paranthura, &c.,
and Sars has figured them also in Asellus aquaticus, but they are rather more numerous
and are longer in Cruregens than in the other species .
In Crangonyx compacfns I have not noticed any increase in the number of sensory
setae beyond what we usually find in similar Amphipods ; in this species, too, the body
is compact and not elongated as in some other species, and the legs are only of the usual
length.
In Gammarus fragilis the body is slender, and the antennae, peraeopoda, and terminal
uropoda are much elongated. On the peraeopoda, the last three pairs of which are of
great length, setae somewhat like the " soies auditives " occur in most of the tufts
of setae fovmd on the various joints, but with this exception there does not appear to be
any increase of sensory setae beyond what we usually find in species of Gammarus.
In Calliopms suhterraneus the body is rather more slender and the various limbs
rather more elongated than in the closely allied species Plierusa ccerulea. Numerous
" soies auditives " are found at various places on the antennae, which, in the male, are
also abundantly suj)plied with " calceoli," which are no doubt also sensory in function.
These, however, are also found in Plierusa cmrulea and in CalUoplus JiiwiatiUs, and in
some species described by Stebbing, such as Eusiroicles Ccesaris, &c., the calceoli are
quite as numerous as in Calliopius suhterraneus.
On the whole the New-Zealand subterranean Crustacea give only a modified support
to the conclusion that subterranean species are more abundantly supplied with sense-
organs (other than eyes) than allied surface-animals. Probably the former have been
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 263
more carefully examined than the majority of surface or marine species, and a fuller
^examination of the latter will perhaps show that many of them are as well supplied
with sensory setse as the suhterranean sjiecies.
The Food of Suhterranean Animals.
The source of the food-supply for the animals living in caves and underground waters
is a question of much interest and of considerable difl&culty. Almost all writers on the
subject speak of the food-supply being very scanty, and yet the animals, though of
course few in numbers compared with those living on the surface of the earth, are
yet numerous, and when captvired do not look particularly ill-fed. According to
Packard [83, p. 2i] the blind fish of the caves of North America probably live on the
blind crayfish and the Crangonyx, and perhaps the Ccecidotcea, and the crayfish also lives
on CiBcklotcea ; so that, confining our attention to the Crustacea, the question is narrowed
down to the food of Crangonyx and Ccecidotcea, viz. animals similar to those found in
undergroimd waters of the Canterbury Plains. As Packax'd points out : — " It goes
without saying that there are no truly vegetable-eating animals living permanently
in the caves ; no plant-life exists (except in rare cases a very few fungi, and most of
these probably carried in by man) in the caves on account of the total darkness "
[83, p. 25].
Crangonyx and Ccecidotcea are hence probably mainly carnivorous, but what they find
to eat is a great puzzle. Packard suggests that they may devour their own young ; but
what the young find to live on he considers still more difficult to conjecture, as rotifers,
infusoria, and copepods are so very scarce. Cope, writing of the fauna of the "Wyandotte
Cave [30, p. 13], states : — " As to the small Crustaceans, little food is necessary to
support theii' small economy, but even that little might be thought to be wanting, as we
observe the clearness and limpidity of the water in which they dwell. Nevertheless, the
fact that some cave-waters communicate with outside streams is a sufficient indication
of the presence of vegetable life and vegetable debris in variable quantities at different
times. Minute freshwater alga3 no doubt occur there, the spores being brought in by
external communication, while remains of larger forms, as confervse &c., would occur
plentifully after floods."
Still the supply imported in this way must be very scanty, and as an illustration of
the general poverty of the food-supply in the caves Packard mentions that in the
Wyandotte Cave the common Myriopod was found gathered around the hardened drops
of tallow which strew the pathways of the cave *.
Concerning the food of the Niplwrgus found in the Avell at Ringwood, Hogan, quoted
by Stebbing [108, p. 316], remarks : — " Some water drawn from the pump at Ringwood
has been proved by microscopical examination to contain numerous animalcules; and
this will probably turn out to be the case with all the waters in which Niphargi are
found."
The facts bearing on this subject that I have observed in connection with the New-
* "The Cave-Beetles of Kentucky," American Naturalist, x. (1876) p. 285.
264 DB. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
Zealand subterranean forms do not, I am afraid, help much toward a solution. The
\\ater in which they are found is very clear and pure, with very little sediment, and in
almost all cases is used for drinking without being filtered. Some years ago Mr. George
Gray, of the School of Agriculture, Lincoln, was kind enough to analyse some of the
water from the Eyreton pump for me, and he found that the amount of organic matter
in it Avas considerably below that allowed for a healthy drinking-water. Mr. Mayne,
speaking of the Ashburton water, informs me that " it stands the permanganate of potash
test." There appear to be very few Infusoria or Rotifera in it ; certainly it could not
be said to contain " numerous animalcules," as stated by Hogan of the water at
Ringwood.
The intestinal canal of the various species is frequently full of a dark blackish or
brownish material, but though I have frequently examined this I have not found any-
thing in it that I could recognize except grains of sand and earth.
I have frequently kept specimens of some of the species in small freshwater aquaria,
and in this have seen them apparently eating small filamentous algae. In April, 1890,
I put three specimens of Crurecjens fontanms into a small bottle containing water taken
from the Brighton Creek, near the sea ; the water in this creek is often brackish, and
has Rnppia mm^itima &c. growing in it, but at the time when I filled my bottle the
water was quite fresh to the taste. In the bottle I had a small piece of Ruppia maritima
growing, also various filamentous algae, and no doubt plenty of Infusoria &c. In this
the three specimens of Cruregens lived till the beginning of June, when one was lost
sight of, a second one died at the beginning of August, and the third about the end of
that month, having thus lived for about five months. During this time I frequently
saw them seize pieces of the algse with their gnathopoda, but I could never make quite
certain whether they ate them or not.
The mouth of Cruregens, like that of the other Antburidae, appears to be suctorial, but I
can form no idea as to what the tinderground Cruregens sucks, unless it merely sucks up a
great quantity of water, retaining any organic materials that it may contain ; the maxillae
form lancet-organs, but I have never seen the animals using them for piercing the stems
of the Rnppia maritima or for any similar purpose. So far as I am aware, we are equally
ignorant of the use that the marine Antburidae make of their suctorial apparatus : from
the structure of their mouths we should almost expect them to suck nutritive fluids from
the bodies of other animals ; but I have never heard of them doing this, and if they did
we might reasonably expect some species at least to have permanently adopted a parasitic
manner of life ; the only parasitic species, however, known to me is Eisothistos vermi-
fonnis, Haswell [54, p. 1], which lives in the tubes of Serpulae ( Vermilia). Haswell says
nothing about the structure of its mouth, and it is uncertain whether it actually derives
its nourishment from the Vetvnilia or not. The other species are usually taken creeping
freely on the surface of various sea-weeds, but whether they live upon these sea-weed&
or not does not appear to be known.
Summing up, we are forced to admit that very little is as yet known as to the source
of the food-supply of the subterranean Crustacea, and further observations on this point
are very desirable. It must also be remembered that these animals may live for a long
CBU8TACEA OF NEW ZEALAND, 205
i
time with very little food ; thus Dr. John Stoan states that a blind fish (Ambli/oj]s/s
spelcBus) lived for twenty months " without having taken any visible food " (see Packard
[83, p. 127]).
Arrested Development.
The fauna of caves and underground regions presents us with several examples of
what appears to be an arrest of development.
Packard has drawn attention to one example. Writing of the cave-dwelling Myriopod
Pseudotremia cavernarum, and comparing it with the widely diffused Li/siopetalum
lactarium, Say, he remarks : — " It differs in having only about half as many segments as
in its out-of-door parent form (this diminution in the number of segments being due to
arrest of development) . . ." [83, p. 120].
In our New-Zealand forms we have a good example of the same thing in Cruregens
fontanus, which has the seventh segment of the peraeon small and without appendages,
as is the case in the young forms of many Isopods. It seems tolerably clear that we have
here simply a case of arrested growth, and not a reversion to a true ancestral form, for
while in the process of development of the embryo of the Isopoda the seventh pair of the
appendages of the perseon are the last to be developed, I am not aware of any reason for
supposing that the ancestors of the Isopoda ever j^ossessed only six pairs of appendages
to the perseon.
In remarking on this example, Alois Humbert quotes other cases observed by Heller.
He states (Archives des Sciences naturelles, viii. [Sept. 1882] p. 267) :—
" Nous rapj)ellerons a ce sujet que le Dr. Camil Heller a d^crit un genre cavernieole
de Glomeride (Trachysplicera), se distinguant des Glomerls en ce qu'il ne possede que
11 segments au lieu de 12, et 15 paires de pattes au lieu de 17 ; le menie auteur a fait
connaitre un autre Myriapode [Brachi/desmus) provenant, comme le precedent, des grottes
de la Carniole et ne differant des Polydesmus que parce qu'il n'a que 19 segments au
lieu de 20, nombre normal cliez les Polydesmides adultes. Si les TrachyspJuera Schmidt'd
et Brachydesnms subterraneus ont 6te etablis d'apres des individus reellement adultes,
ce qvie nous avons certaines raisons de croire, il y aurait chez ces deux Myriapodes un
arret de developpement tout-a-fait semblable a celui que M. Cliilton vient d'observer aux
antipodes chez son Crustace souterrain."
M. Humbert attributes this ai'rest of development in cave-animals to the influence of
darkness, the lack of sufficient food, and the other necessary conditions of their environ-
ment.
I have given above merely the examples of arrested development that are known to
me ; probably a full examination of the literature of the subject would show that many
others have been recorded.
Habits.
In their habits in confinement the subterranean Crustacea seem to differ ])ut little from
their surface allies. Observations on their habits have been made by Hogan [59 and 60],
Stebbing [108], Packard [83, pp. 123-130, &c.], and others. According to Hogan,
266 DR. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
quoted by Sjience Bate [1, i. p. 321], Nipliargus fontanus " soon dies if exposed to
the light." This is certainly not my experience with the New-Zealand forms : I have
kept all the species, except Phreatoicus, for longer or shorter periods in glass bottles, in
which they could get no shelter, exposed to the full light of day ; and if the water was
properly aerated, they appeared to live without inconvenience. As stated above, species of
Cruregens fontanus have thus lived for five months. In the same bottle I afterwards
kept a specimen of Gammarus fragilis, wliich appeared quite at home, but then un-
fortunately died during an unsuccessful attempt to moult its exoskeleton. It had no
shelter from the ordinary light of day, and made no attemj)t to hide itself ; if placed so
that the strong light of a lamp was focussed on to it by the convex surface of the bottle
it, however, moved away. I did not notice anything peculiar in its habits ; it usually
crawled around at the bottom of the jar or along the stems of the plants in the bottle,
but at times swam freely like ordinary Amphipods.
There is very little more to record concerning the habits of the Cruregens. The animals
usually crawled about on the bottom or along the stems and leaves of the Ruppia
mariUma ; they could not, however, crawl up the vertical sides of the bottle, the glass
being too smooth for them ; they ran backward and forward with equal rapidity, and
did not seem particular which way they went ; they did not swim, but if they dropped
off the plant wriggled helplessly till they reached the bottom. I did not notice any-
thing that would indicate any power of vision, but, on the other hand, often saw them
running against objects in a way which seemed to indicate that they were totally blind ;
occasionally I have seen two approach very near each other, apparently without being
aware of it, and then suddenly jump apart when one touched the other.
IX. The Bearings of the Phenomena of Subterranean Life on the
Theory of Descent.
It has been early recognized that the phenomena of cave and subterranean life have an
important bearing on the Theory of Descent. Here the conditions of life are so peculiar,
so abnormal, the fauna so scanty, and its environment so simple and so i-estricted that we
may naturally expect to find the problems that are to be solved presented to us in their
simplest forms. Thus we have no vegetable life of any kind except a few fungi, only a
comparatively small number of animals of various groups, and these surrounded by con-
tinual night and exposed to a temperature probably pretty uniform from year to year ;
in many cases we can tell, with at any rate a fair approach to accuracy, from what
surface-species the underground species has descended ; and knowing also, within certain
limits, the age of the latter, we can estimate the changes undergone and consequently
the rate at which these have been made in this jiarticular instance.
The importance of Isolation in securing permanence of type in the case of cave-
dwelling animals has been dwelt upon by Packard [83, pp. 14jO-14<1]. Similar remarks
would apply with perhaps even greater force to the subterranean fauna, such as that of
the underground waters of the Canterbury Plains, for it is probably even more com-
pletely isolated from the surface-fauna than is that of caves.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 267
It is, however, with regard to the effects of the disuse of organs that the cave and
subterranean fauna has been studied with the greatest interest, and here we closely
approach the controversy between the Neo-Darwinians and the Neo-Lamarckians. While
it would be utter presumption on the part of the writer to enter upon a discussion of this
question, it will be interesting to review a few of the opinions expressed by various
writers on the subject in so far as it is exemplified by the phenomena of subterranean
life.
Darwin, in his ' Origin of Species ' [35, pp. 110-112], after pointing out that in the
case of the mole and similar burrowing animals natural selection will probably aid the
effects of disuse in producing blindness, refers to the blind inhabitants of caves, and
remarks : — " As it is difficult to imagine that eyes, though useless, could be in any way
injurious to animals living in darkness, their total loss may be attributed to disuse "
[35, p. 110].
Further on, after quoting Schiodte's observations as to animals, some of which are
adapted to the twilight and others to the perfect darkness of caves, he observes : —
«' By the time that an animal had reached, after numberless generations, the deepest
recesses, disuse will on this view have more or less perfectly obliterated its eyes, and
natural selection will often have effected other changes, such as in increase in the length
of the antenna? or palpi, as a compensation for blindness " [35, p. 111].
That animals living in darkness do as a general rule gradually lose their eyes is now a
very familiar fact, and it no doubt appears at first sight simplest to explain this as an
example of the effects of disuse ; but there are numerous instances known of animals
living in darkness that yet possess more or less perfect eyes, and unless these can be
accounted for in some way they would appear to prove that the effect of darkness, per se,
does not necessarily produce degeneration of the eyes. Semper, in his ' Animal Life '
[99, pp. 76-87], after giving a number of examples of the loss of eyesight apparently
through disuse, adds that " it would nevertheless be wholly false to assume that lack of
light must necessarily lead to total or partial blindness " [99, p. 81] ; he then
proceeds to give examples of animals living in darkness with more or less perfect eyes,
and on the contrary, of animals blind or half-blind, which yet " live in w^ell-illuminated
situations, where the moderate intensity of the light would allow them the full use of
eyes." The examples given by Semper have been considered in detail by Packard [83,
pp. 130-132], who points out that some, at any rate, of the first group are " twilight
animals," living near the entrance of the caves as well as in the total darkness of the
innermost recesses, and that those animals which live in total darkness may perhaps cross
with those living near the entrance, and the eyes thus remain unimpaired. Other cases
in which our knowledge is not so complete, may, he considers, perhaps be explained in
the same way; and with regard to the second group, i. e. blind or half-blind animals living
in weU-lighted situations, many may spend the greater part of their lives burrowino- in
the mud or in dark places where eyes would be of little or no service to them ; in this
way he explains the blind Cymothou mentioned by Semper [99, p. 83] which he found in
the full light of day.
Whilst some cases may perhaps be accounted for in this way, it does not seem to me that
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 35
2f!R DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
all, even of those mentioned by Semper, can be thus explained. Thus Packard appears to
make no reference to the Pinnotheres mentioned by Semper [99, p. 80], the zogeaof which
has well-developed eyes of the typical character, while the full-grown animals which live
in the " water-lungs " of Holothurians " gradually become blind or half-blind ; the brow
grows forward over the eyes, and finally covers them so completely that, in the oldest
individuals, not the slightest trace of them, or of the pigment, is to be seen through the
thick skin ; while at the same time the eyes seem to undergo a more or less extensive
retrogressive metamorphosis " [99, p. 81].
Cases like this certainly seem to indicate, as Semper observes, " that the influence of
darkness is proved to be direct in each individual, and not hereditary." Here we see that
the eyes are preserved in the free swimming zosea, where they are of service to the animal,
but are gradually lost in the adult, where they are no longer required ; and while this
shows the powerful effects of disuse in the individual, it does not show that these effects
are inherited without the intervention of Natural Selection, as appears to be assumed by
Packard and others, who account for the blindness of cave animals by the direct effect of
the darkness and the consequent disuse of the organs. If the characters thus acquired
through disuse were necessarily inherited, we should expect to find the eyes of the zosea of
the Pinnotheres more or less imperfect.
Packard, who discusses the bearing of cave life on the Theory of Descent at con-
siderable length, is thoroughly Neo-Lamarckian in his views, and sees little or no room for
the operation of Natural Selection. Thus, on p. 121, he remarks : —
" Given great changes in the physical surroundings, inducing loss of eyes through
disuse, the abolition in some cases of the optic ganglia and optic nerves, the elongation of
the appendages, isolation from out-of-door allies, and the transmission by heredity owing
to close in-and-in breeding within the narrow fixed limits of the cave, are not these
collectively verce causae ? Do they not fully account for the original variations and their
fixation ? In short, can we not clearly understand the mode of origin of cave species and
genera ? What room is there in a case like this, or in that of parasitic animals, for the
operation of natural selection ? The latter principle only plays, it has seemed to us, a
very subordinate and final part in the set of causes inducing the origin of these forms "
[83, p. 121].
If these modifications, however, were the direct inherited eff'ect of the environment,
i. e. darkness &c., should we not expect to find them similar in all animals subjected to
the same conditions ? The modifications might be greater in some instances than in others,
in accordance with the varying lengths of time that the animals had lived under these
conditions, but we should certainly expect that the development in all cases would be
proceeding uniformly and in the same direction. Now it seems to me that we do not
find this process demonstrated even in the facts adduced by Packard himself, but that
there is a certain apparent capriciousness which is inconsistent with the constant and
uniformly acting causes that he sets forth. Thus, in the case of the eyes, instead of
the degeneration proceeding on similar lines in all individuals, we may have — :
(1) Total atrophy of optic lobes and optic nerves, with or without the persistence in
part of the pigment or retina and the crystalline lens ;
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 269
(2) Persistence of the optic lobes and optic nerves, but total atrophy of the rods and
cones, retina (pigment), and facets ; or
(3) Total atrophy of the optic lobes, optic nerves, and all the optic elements. [See
83, p. 118.]
If we consider the other modifications of the body, legs, antennae, &c., which Packard
also accounts for as " evidently the result of loss of sight " [83, p. 120], Ave still find the
same capriciousness, and even in a more marked degree. Thus, taking our New Zealand
forms, we find that Cruregens fontanus and Culliopius subterraneus have developed
additional sensory setae beyond what are usiially to be found in their surface relatives,
while apparently Gammariis fragilis and Crangonyx compactus, and certainly the two
species of Phreatoicus, have not. Again, in the species of Phreatoicus, in Gammarus
fragilis, and to a less degree in Callioplm subterraneus and Cruregens fontanus, the
body, antennae, and appendages are slender and elongated, while there is no sign of
a similar modification in Crangonyx compactus, which has the body normally stout, the
antennae and legs of only moderate length, and the uropoda even somewhat short and
stumpy.
Many similar examples could doubtless be adduced from a review of the underoround
fauna of other covmtries. Thus Boruta tenebrarum [124, pp. 677-G87] does not appear
to have the body particularly slender or the appendages elongated, while the species
of Niphargus usually do possess these peculiarities ; in Niphurgus the outer branch
of the third uropoda is greatly elongated, in Gammarus fragilis the peduncle and
both branches of the third uropoda are similarly elongated, while again in Cranqonyx
mucronatus, Forbes, the elongation takes place, not in the third uropoda at all, but in
the telson !
These examples, showing a development apparently capricious and varying in its
direction in animals all subjected to the same or similar environment, appear to jjoint rather
to the action of Natural Selection seizing here upon one variation useful to the animal and
there upon another, and fixing and maintaining these variations just as we find it doino-
in the more complicated phenomena of surface life. Packard refers to the cave
Crustaceans as living " in a sphere where there is little, if any, occasion for struffo-liuo-
for existence between these organisms " [83, p. 110].
But surely here, as elsewhere, the animals tend to increase in a geometrical ratio, and
since all cannot live, must necessarily struggle among themselves for food, which is as
Packard points out, very scanty. The Ccecidotea and Crangonyx of the North-American
caves are, Packard states, eaten by the blind crayfish, and must therefore " struggle," in
the sense in wliich the word is used by Darwin, with their destroyer, and in this struo-o'le
they appear to have developed those additional olfactory sette, &c., mentioned by
Packard, which enable them more readily to escape their enemy. If they had no
occasion for struggling for existence, w^hy should these additional sense-organs be
developed at all ?
Packard does not appear to have considered the action of Natural Selection on the
individuals of the same species, an action which results in the perfecting and maintainiu"-
in a state of perfection any organ that is of importance to the animal. It is, however,
35*
270 Dll. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
this action of Natural Selection which is of the most importance when we consider the
case of the blind inhabitants of caves, &c., as has been clearly pointed out by AVallace
[115, p. 413, &c.], Weismann [119, p. 90, &c.], &c. My former teacher, Professor
Hutton, put it very clearly and impressively in his lectures when he said that Natural
Selection consists not so much in the " Survival of the Fittest " as in the " Non-survival of
the Upfittest" ; and, as he proceeded to demonstrate, the difference between the two points
of view is a real one, and not a mere question of words. Thus, in the case of any animal
living in the full light, a certain degree of perfection of eyesight will be required by the
animal in order to enable it to escape its enemies, obtain food, &c., and all individuals
falling below this standard will perish ; so that by the action of Natural Selection the
eyesight of the animal will be kept in perfect adaptation to its environment. Now in the
case of animals that have taken to living in dark caverns, &c., the eyesight, being no
longer of use to the animal, will no longer be maintained in its state of perfection by
Natural Selection (although of course Natural Selection will still act on other organs
that are of use in the darkness) ; consequently all degrees of eyesight will stand an equal
chance of preservation, and by the intercrossing of individuals of varying degrees of
perfection there will result a degeneration of the eyesight — a " regression towards
mediocrity," as Galton has called it. The explanation of the gradual loss of the eyes in
cave animals is the one adopted by Wallace, in his ' Darwinism ' [115, p. 416], who also
adds that besides becoming useless, the eyes might also become injurious on account of
their delicacy of organization and liability to accidents and disease ; so that in addition to
the " regression towards mediocrity," owing to the withdrawal of the action of Natural
Selection in maintaining perfection. Natural Selection would also actively reduce and finally
abort them. It is important to observe that this " regression towards mediocrity " is a
general law of heredity, and produces its effect quite irrespective of any use or disuse of
the organ in question [Wallace, 115, p. 414]. A similar explanation has been given
by Weismann [119, pp. 90 and 292], who has introduced the term '■'Panmixia" for the
suspension of the preserving influence of Natural Selection, and the consequent inter-
crossing of animals of all standards of perfection.
Of course, if we accept his dogma of the non-heredity of acquired characters, that
at once excludes the effects of disuse as an explanation of the blindness of cave animals ;
but even without going to this length the principle of panmixia, combined with the other
active effect of Natural Selection adduced by Wallace, will be sufficient to account for
much of the degeneration of eyesight, and to these must be added another equally
important consideration advanced by Lankester [70, p. 818-819]. After pointing out
that the eyesight of different individuals varies, owing to congenital fortuitous variations,
he remarks : —
" Suppose that a number of some species of Arthropod or Fish be swept into a cavern
or be carried from less to greater depths in the sea, those individuals with perfect eyes
would follow the glimmer of light, and eventually escape to the outer air or the
shallower depths, leaving behind those with imperfect eyes to breed in the dark place.
A natural selection would thus be effected."
This explanation is no doubt a true statement of fact, for caverns and underground
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 271
waters have in all probability Ijeen gradually peopled by animals from the surrounding
neighboiu-hood, and as they advanced further and further into the darkness a selection
of this kind would go on in each geueration, and, as Poulton has observed, " such a
sifting process would certainly greatly quicken the rate of degeneration due to panmixia
alone" [119, p. 292, footnote]. The same explanation is quoted with approval by
W. P. Ball, who considers, however, that ixinmixla "would probably be the most
important factor in causing blindness" [3, pp. 17, 72].
To the various causes mentioned above we must add the effects of disuse in the
individual, which are undovibtedly very considerable in amount, and in cave animals
breeding in the darkness would commence in all cases from birth.
I may add here one or two notes on the age of the blind fauna of caves and wells, and
on the rate at which development has consequently taken place in these animals.
Although, as I have pointed out elsewhere (pp. 2.o3-25S), there is reason to believe that
some, at any rate, of the blind species are older than the surface fauna at present
inhabiting the same neighbourhood, there seems little reason to doubt that the whole
underground fauna is of comparatively recent origin. Packard [82, p. 25], after con-
sidering the facts on the question adduced by Cope, came to the conclusion that " the
subterranean fauna of this country does not date back of the Quaternary Period." In
his later paper he repeats this opinion, and, after considering the different classes of
caves more fully, adds : —
" It seems, then, fair to assume that the final completion of the caverns, when they
became ready for occupancy by their present fauna, may not date back more than, to
put it into concrete figures, from 7000 to 10,000 years, the time generally held by
geologists to be sufficient for the cutting of the present river gorge of the Niagara and
the Palls of St. Anthony. We may, then, put the age of our cave fauna as not much
over from .5000 to 10,000 years before the dawn of history, which itself extends back
some 5000 to 6000 years" [83, p. 23J.
He concludes, therefore, that the greatest part of the cave fauna of North America
was directly derived from the present fauna, and that consequently the changes under-
gone have been brought about in at most a few thousands of years.
The fauna of the European caves descrilied by Schiodte, &c., also seems to date from
the " close of the Tertiary, or more probably the beginning of the Quaternary Period "
(Packard [82, p. 25]).
In New Zealand, too, the subterranean fauna must be very recent, geologically
speaking. All the places where subterranean forms are found are marked on Professor
Haast's geological map of Canterbury and Westland [53] as either " post-pliocene
alluvium " or " recent alluvium," most of them being in the latter. Phreatoicus, by its
generalized character and by its occurrence in Australia as well as in New Zealand, is
shown to be an ancient form, probably once widely spread in fresh waters, but of
course it does not foUow that its subterranean species are more ancient than the other
subterranean forms. If t'lorough search were made it is quite possible that some
species of the genus would still be found inhabiting freshwater streams among the
Southern Alps.
272 DE. C. CHILTON OF THE SUBTERKANEAN
In speaking of the variety freihergensis, Schneider, of Asellus aquaticus, Moniez
says : —
" Differents auteurs (Schneider, Chilton, etc.) attachent beaucoup d'importance a la
date a laquelle ont ete fores les puits dont ils ont etudie les eaux, admettant volontiers,
mais bien gratuitement, a notre avis, que c'est a cette epoque que les animaux y sont
arrives et ont commence a se modifier. Nous avons deja fait entendre, a propos du
Cyclofs fulchellus (p. 34), que cette facon naive de j)roceder a I'etude de la variation
des especes ne pent se soutenir, car elle ne tient pas compte d'un facteur important
dans la question, celle des eaux sowterraines, dans lesquelles les animaux observes pou-
vaient vivre avant le forage, et par lesquelles, grace anx infiltrations, de nouveaux in-
dividus a I'etat d'oeufs, ou meme a I'^tat parfait, peuvent arriver a tout instant, comme
nous I'avons fait remarquer plus haut (pp. 37, 38) " [78, p. 52, footnote].
It is true that in my first jDaper on the Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand I did
mention the age of the well from which they were obtained, because I wished to give
all the facts that might have a bearing ou the question, and though the age of the well
has, of course, nothing to do with the development of the Subterranean Crustacea, it may
have had some effect on numbers occurring at that particular place ; but there is nothing
in my paper that can be interpreted to mean that I imagined that the Crustacea — all
true subterranean forms — had begun to modify only after the well was bored ; and in
my second paper [23, p. 87, &c.] I made it quite clear that the Crustacea are inhabitants
of the underground waters and not merely of the wells.
The cases brought forward by Schneider, i. e. Gammarus pulex, var. siMerraueus, and
Asellus aquaticus, var. freihergensis, seem to me to be quite different. Here, as in
the case of Gammarus fluviaiiUs, var. d' Emmerin, mentioned by Moniez himself, we
have subterranean varieties which differ from the parent species still found on the
surface only in a few small points, such as colovir, slight degeneration of the eyes, &c.,
and though 1 do not know what age is to be assigned to the mines in which Schneider
found his examples, I see no reason for doubting that these slight differences have been
acquired in a very few generations. Other similar examples are given by Packard ; one
is that of some examples of an isopod found in subterranean regions, which, although
of the normal form and size of Asellus communis (the surface species), were bleached
as white as Ccecidotca stygia, and of this variety, which he calls pallida, Packard
remarks : — " It is interesting to note the occurrence of this bleached variety, which may
have become thus modified after but a few generations, perhaps but one or two " [83, p. 32].
Other examples given appear to confirm this view, and all go to show that slight
modifications, such as in the cases mentioned above, may be produced within very
short periods.
X. Conclusion.
In the foregoing pages I have endeavoured to give as full and accurate an account
of the Subterranean Crustacea of New Zealand as the material and the time at my
disposal would allow. But although the work has gradually grown under my hands
until the present memoir has far exceeded the limits I originally anticipated, its
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 273
increase in size has, I fear, only multiplied its imperfections, and given rise to more
questions than have been solved. It has, indeed, shown that no single animal can be
profitably studied by itself, but that in attempting to explain one we must study all,
and that the one can be thoroughly known only when all are known.
In concluding his work on the fauna of the Swiss Lakes, Porel has pointed out that
the phenomena connected therewith, which at first appeared strange, anomalous, and
altogether unaccountable, were gradually interpreted witla increasing knowledge until
they harmonized with what we learn of the Avorkings of nature in other places less
far removed from man's curious gaze. The same statement applies to the consideration
of subterranean life, and we can exclaim mth Forel — " La nature est grande et belle,
parce qu'elle est harmonieuse en tout et partout."
But one fact that has been impressed upon me more than any other by the very
existence of subterranean life is the keenness of the struggle for existence that goes on
in the world of animals and plants. I am not aware that he ever did so, but from tiie
tendency of animals to increase in a geometrical ratio, and the consequent struggle for
life, Darwin might have deduced the conclusion that every spot on earth capable of
supporting life at all would be occupied by its apjn'opriate denizen ; and certainly such
a conclusion would have been amply verified by the facts now known. Even if we
take a single group like the Crustacea, and of these only the small and apparently help-
less Amphipoda and Isopoda, we find that they have spread until scarcely any place can
be named from which they are absent. They are found on land and in the sea ; in
running streams and in stagnant ponds ; in hot springs and in frozen pools ; hio-h on
mountain-tops and deep in mines ; on the seashore and far out in the ocean ; burrowino-
in mud and boring into wood and stone ; on the surface of the sea and in its lowest
depths ; in the waters on the earth and in the dark recesses of caverns and of the waters
under the earth, where no storm ruffles the everlasting stillness, no light illumines the
thick darkness, and no sound breaks the eternal silence.
XL Bibliography.
List of Works referred to.
[The originals of many of the works quoted below have been inaccessible to the writer,
the contents being, however, known to him through abstracts and notices in other works.
The chief source from which such information has been gained is given in each case but
in many cases the contents of a paper have been known through abstracts in several other
works.
Though the list is far from complete, it is hoped that the chief works bearino- on the
Subterranean Amphipoda and Isopoda will be found mentioned below.]
1. AsPER, G. — " Beit rage zur Keimtniss der Tiefseefauua der Schweizersecu/' Zoologischer Anzeiger
Band iii. Jahrg. 1880, pp. 130-134., 200-207.
2. AsPER, G. — " tlber die Lichtverliiiltnisse in grossen Wassertiefen." Kosmos, Zeitsehrift fvir die
gesammte Entwicklungslehre, Band i. Stuttgart, 1885.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 715].
274 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
3. Ball, W. P. — ' Are the Effects of Use and Disuse inherited ? An examination of the view held hj
Spencer and Darwin.' Nature Series. London, 1890.
4. Bate, C. Spence, and Westwood, J. O. — 'A History of the British Sessile-eyed Crustacea.' 2 vols.
London, 1863-1868.
5. Bate, C. Spence. — 'Catalogue of the Specimens of Amphipodous Crustacea in the Collection of the
British Museum.' London, 1862.
6. Bate, C. Spence. — " On the Genus Niphargus, Schiodte." Dublin Univ. Zool. and Bot. Assoc. Proc.
vol. i. 1859, pp. 237-240, figs. 1-4.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 311.]
7. Bate, C. Spence. — " On the British Edriophthalma." Report of the Glasgow Meeting of the British
Association for the Advancement of Science. 1855. London, 1856, pp. 18-62, pis. xii.-xxii.
8. Beddard, Frank E. — "Anatomical Description of two new Genera of Aquatic OligocJneta." Trans.
Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. xxxvi., part ii., no. 11, pp. 273-305, plates i.-iii.
Edinburgh, 1891.
9. Beddard, Frank E. — " Report on the Isopoda collected by H.M.S. 'Challenger'.'' — Part II. Report
on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. 'Challenger' during the years 1873-76.
Zoology, vol. xvii., part xlviii. London, &c., 1886.
10. Beneden, Edouard von. — " Sur la presence k Li^ge du Niphargus puteanus, Sch." Bulletin de
1' Academic royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 3 serie, tome viii.
no. 12. Bruxelles, 1884, pp. 650-652.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 715] .
11. Blanc, Henri. — "Isopode aveugle de la region profonde du Leman, etc." Bulletin de la Societe
Vaudoise des Sciences naturelles, ser. 2, vol. 16, p. 377, pi. 13.
Quoted from Bovallius [15, p. 10].
12. Blanc, Henri. — " Contribution a I'histoire naturelle des Asellotes heteropodes. Observations faites
sur la Tanais Oerstedii, Kroyer." Avec les planches x., xi., et xii. Recueil zoologique suisse
(Dr. Herman Fol), tome premier, no. 2, pp. 189-258. Geneve-B^le, 1884.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 549] .
13. Boas, J. E. V. — " Studien iiber die V'erwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Malakostraken." Morpholog.
Jahrbuch, Band viii., pp. 485-579, plates xxi.-xxiv.
14. BoECK, Axel. — " Crustacea Amphipoda borealia et arctica." Vidensk-Selsk. Forhandlinger, 1870.
15. Bovallius, Karl. — " Notes on the Family Asellidse." Bihaiig till k. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Hand-
lingar. Band ii., no. 15, pp. 1-54. Stockholm, 1880.
16. Bovallius, Karl. — " lanthe, a new genus of Isopoda." Loc. cit. Band vi. no. 4, p. 4.
17. Bruzelius, Raynar M. — " Bid rag till kannedomen om Skandinaviens Amphipoda Gammaridea."
K. Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademieiis Handliugar, vol. 3, no. 1, 1859, pp. 1-104, pis. i.-iv.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 312].
18. Budde-Lund, G. — " Crustacea Isopoda Terrestria." Copenhagen, 1885.
19. Caspary, Robert. — " Gammarus jjvteanus." Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der
preussischen Rheinlande uid VVestfalen, 6. Jahrg. pp. 39-48, Taf. ii. (Bonn, 1849).
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 708].
20. Catta, J. D. — " Sur uu Amphipode nouveau, le Gammarus rhipidiophorus ." Actes de la Societe
Helvetique des Sciences naturelles reunie k Bex, les 20, 21, et 22 aout 1877. GO' session.
Compte-rendu, 1876 & 1877, pp. 257-263. Lausanne, 1878.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 475].
21. Chilton, Chas.--" Notes on son.c New-Zealand Amphipoda and Isopoda." Transactions New
Zealand Institute, vol. xxiv. pp. 2.")8-269. Wellington, N. Z., 1882.
22. Chilton, Chas. — "On some Subterranean Crustacea." Loc. cit. vol. xiv. pp. 174-180, pis. ix. & x.
CEUSTACEA OF ]SEW ZEALAND. 275
(Abstract iu the ' New Zealand Journal of Science,' vol. i. (March 1882) p. 44, also in ' Nature/
Sept. 28, 1882. Review by Alois Humbert in 'Archives des Sciences naturelles/ Sept. 1882,
viii. pp. 265-267.)
23. Chilto.v, CiiAs. — "Notes on, and a new Species of, Subterranean Crustacea." Loc. cit. vol. xv.
pp. 87-92, plate iv.
24. Chilton, Chas. — "Revision of the New Zealand IdoteidiE." Loc. cit. vol. xxii. pp. 189-204.
25. Chilton, Chas. — "Subterranean Crustacea." New Zealand Journal of Science, vol. ii., March
1884, p. 89. (The writer's name was accidentally omitted from this article.)
26. Chilton, Chas. — " On a new and peculiar Freshwater Isopod from Mt. Kosciusko." Records of the
Australian Museum, vol. i. part 8, pp. 149-171, plates xxiii.-xxvi. Sydney, 1891.
27. Chilton, Chas. — "A new Species of Munna from New Zealand." Annals & Magazine Natural
History, ser. 6, vol. ix., Jan. 1892, pp. 1-12, pis. i. & ii.
27*. Chilton, Chas. (and Thomson, G. M.).— See Thomson, G. M. [HI].
28. Chyzer, C. — " ijber die Crustaceenfauna Ungarns." Verhaudl. der k.-k. zoologisch-botanischen
Gesellschaft in Wien. Wien, 1858.
Quoted from Wrzcsniowski [124, p. 710].
29. Cope, E. D.— " Life in the Wyandotte Cave." Ann, & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. viii., Nov. 1871,
pp. 368-370.
30. Cope, E. D. — " On the Wyandotte Cave and its Fauna." American Naturalist, vol. vi., July
1872, pp. 1-17.
31. Cope, E. D., and Packard, A. S., Jun. — " The Fauna of the Nickajack Cave." Loc. cit. Nov. 1881,
p. 877.
32. Costa, Achille. — " Rieerche sui Crostacei Amphipodi del regno di Napoli." Memorie della Reale
Accademia delle Scienze, vol. i. fasc. 2. Napoli, 1857.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 295].
33. CzERNiAVSKi (Tschernjafski), Woldemak. — " Materialia ad Zoographiam Ponticam comparatam."
Studiosi Universitatis Charcoviensis Voldemari Czerniavski.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 378].
34. Daday, Eugene. — ' Catalogus Crustaceoruni fauu;e Transylvaniae e collectione Musei Transylvanici,
coUegit et determinavit. . . . Kolosvart (Klausenburg).^ 1884.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 715].
35. Darwin, Charles. — ' The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection.' Sixtii edition (Twenty-
second thousand). London, 1880.
36. Dohrn, Anton. — " Zur Kenntniss dcs Baues von Paranthura costana." Untersuchungen iilier Bau
und Entwicklung der Arthropodeu, Erstes Heft, no. v. pp. 91-103, plate ix. Leipzig,
1870.
37. Faxon, Walter. — " A Revision of the Astacidpe. — Part I. The genera Cambarus and Astacus."
Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, vol. x. no. 4.
38. Forel, F. a. — " Introduction k I'etude de la Faune profonde du Lac Leman." Bulletin de la
Societe Yaudoise des Sciences naturelles, vol. x. no. G2, December 1869, p. 221.
Quoted from Humbert [62, p. 288].
39. FoREL, F. A. — " Faunistische Studicn in den Siisswasserseen der Sehweiz." Zeitschrift fiir wissen-
schaftliche Zoologie, Dreissigster Band, Supplement (Leipzig, 1878), pp. 383-391.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 476].
40. FoREL, F. A. — " La Faune profonde des Lacs suisses." Memoires de la Societe Helvetique des
Sciences naturelles, vol. xxix. 2'-' livraison, August 1885.
41. Forbes, S. A. — "List of Illinois Crustacea." Bulletin Illinois Museum of Natural History, I. 6",
Dec. 1876, figs. 1-7. Quoted from Packard [83, p. 37].
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 36
276 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEREANEAN
42. Fric a. "Die Krustenthiere Bolimens." Archiv fiir die naturwissenschaftliclie Laudesdurch-
forsclmng Bohmeus, ii. Tlieil. Prag. (Also published in Bohemian.)
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 712].
43. Fries, S. — " Mittheilungen aus dem Gebiete der Dunkelfauna. — I. Gammarus {Niphargus) pute-
anus)." Zoolog. Auzeiger, 1879, pp. 33-38, 56-60, 129-134, 309.
44. Fries, S. — " Die Falkensteiuer Holile, ihre Fauna und Flora." Jahreshefte des Vereius fiir
vaterltindische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg, 30 Jahrg. Stuttgart, 1874.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 712].
45. Gerstaecker, A. — ' Dr. H. G. Bronn's Klassen uud Ordnungen des Tliierreichs, wissenschaftlich
dargesellt in Wort und Bild. Fortgesetzt von Dr. A. Gerstaecker.' Fiinfter Band, ii. Abtheil-
ung. Gliederfiissler : Arthropoda.
46. Gervais, Paul. — " Note sur deux especes de Crevettes qui vivent aux environs de Paris." Annales
des Sciences naturelles. Zoologie. Second surie. Tome quatrieme. Paris, 1835.
47. Gervais, Paul, et Beneden, P. J. van.— ■' Zoologie Medicale.' Tome premier. Paris, 1859.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 316].
48. Godet, Paul. — ''Bulletin de la Societe d'llistoire naturelle de Neuchatel,' tome ix., 2°"= cahier,
avec 1 pi. Quoted from Humbert [62, p. 291].
49. Godet, Paul. — "Note sur le Gammarus putcanus.''^ Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences naturelles de
Neuchatel, vol. xi. February 1878.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 713].
50. Giebel, C. J. — ' Zeitschrift fiir diegesammten Naturwissenschaften,' Bd. Ii. (3. Serie, iv. Bd.). Halle,
1879. Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 713].
51. Grimm, Oscar. — " Beitrag zur Kenntniss einiger blinden Amphipoden des Kaspisees." Archiv fiir
Naturgeschichte, Seclis uud vierzigster Jahrgang, Erster Band (Berlin, 1880), pp. 117-126.
(Translated by W. S. Dallas, F.L.S., in the 'Annals & Magazine of Natural History,' no. 26,
February 1880, pp. 85-92.)
52. Griffith, G. S. — Presidential Address to Section E (Geography) of the Australian Association for
the Advancement of Science. Christchurch Meeting, 1891. Report, vol. iii. pp. 232-250.
53. Haast, Sir Julius von. — ' Geology of the Provinces of Canterbury and Westland, New Zealand.'
Christchurch, N.Z., 1879.
54. HASVifELL, W. A. — " Ou a new Crustacean found inhabiting the tubes of Vermilia (Serpulidas)."
Proceedings of the Linuean Society of New South Wales, vol. ix. part 3, pp. 1-4, plates xxxvi.
and xxxvii.
55. Haswell, W. a. — " A Revision of the Australian Isopoda." Proceedings of the Linnean Society of
New South Wales, vol. ix. part 4, pp. 1-15, plates l.-liii.
56. Hay, O. P. — "Notes on some Freshwater Crustacea, together with Descriptions of Two new
Species." American Naturalist, February 1882, vol. xvi, no. 2, pp. 143-146.
57. (?Halliday). — "Description of Crustacea, with a plate." The Natural History Review and
Quarterly Journal of Science, no. 14. January 1857. London and Dublin.
58. Heller, Camil. — " Kleinc Beitriige zur Kenntniss der Siisswasser-xVmphipoden." Mit 1 Tafel (Taf.
17). Aus den Verhandlungen d. k.-k. zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wicn (Jahrgang
1865) besonders abgedruckt.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 359].
59. Hogan, Arthur R. — "On the habits of Nipharyiis foiUunus (n. s.). A'. Kochianus (n. s.), and
Crariffonyx subterraneus (n. g. & s.), Speuce Bate." The Natural History Review and
Quarterly Journal of Science, vol. vi., 1859, pp. 166-169.
60. Hogan, Arthur R. — "Notice of British Well-Shrimps." Report of the 30th Meeting of the
British Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 116-117. London, 1861.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 277
61. Hosius, August. — " Uber die Gamma)-ns-\rtcn der Gegend von Bonn." Archiv fiir Natur-
geschichtc, ]5. Jalirg., 1850, Bd. i. pp. 233-248, Taf. i.-ii.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 708].
62. Humbert, Alo'js. — " Desoription du Niphargus puteanus, var. Forelii." Bulletin de la Societe
Vaudoisc dcs Sciences naturellcs, tome xiv., 1876, pp. 278-398, pis. 6 & 7. (Abstract in
the ' Bibliotheque Universelle : Archives des Sciences,' 15th Jan. 1877, pp. 58-75, a translation
of which, by W. S. Dallas, F.L.S., appeared in the 'Annals & Magazine of Natural Historj','
ser. 4, vol. xix. 1877, pp. 243-254.
63. HuTTON, F. W.- — ' Handbook of Christchnrch. For the use of the Members of the Australasian
Association for the Advancement of Science.' Edited by F. W. Hutton. Christchnrch, N.Z.,
1891.
64. Imhof, O. E. — " Die pelagisehe Fauna und die Tiefseefauna der zwei Savoyer Seen, lac du Bourgct
und lac Annecy." Zoologischer Anzeiger, G. Jahrg., 1883, no. 154, pp. 655-657.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 715].
65. Joseph, Gustav. — " Uber die Grotten in den Krainer Gebirgen und deren Thierwelt." Jahresbcrich
der schlesischen Gesellschaft f. vaterl. Cultur, Jahrg. 1868, p. 48. Breslau, 1SG9.
' Quoted from Humbert [62, p. 287].
66. Joseph, Gustav. — '' Zur geographischen Verbreitnng von Niphargus puteanus." Zoologischer
Anzeiger, 1879, pp. 380-381.
67. Joseph, Gustav. — " Systematisches Verzeichnis der in den Tropfstein-Grotten von Ki'ain cinheim-
ischen Arthropoden, nebst Diagnosen der vom Verfasser entdecken und bisher noeh nicht
beschriebenen Arten." Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift (1875-1881, Deutsche entomolo-
gische Zeitschrift). Herausgegeben von dem Entomologischen Verein in Berlin, Bd. xxvi.,
4. Heft. Berlin, 1882.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 714].
68. JuBTNAC, A. E. — ' Ein Beitrag zur Kenutniss der Faune des Kroatischen Karstes und seiner unter-
irdischen Hohlen.' Inaug. dissert. INIunich, 36 pp., 1 pi., 1888.
Quoted from Moniez [78, j). 49] .
69. Koch, C. L. — 'Dcutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapodeu und Arachniden.' Regensburg, 1835-1841.
Quoted fi-om Stabbing [108, p. 159].
70. Lankester, E. Ray. — Article " Zoology " in the ' Encyclopaedia Britannica,' vol. xxiv. p. 818
1888.
71. Lachmann, Johannes. — Uber cinige Parasiten des Brunneri-FIohkrebs [Grammarus puieanus)^
Sitzungsberichte der niederrheinische Gesellschaft fiir Natur- und Heilkunde zu Bonn.
Sitzung vom 2. Marz 1859. Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereines der preussischeu
Rheinlande und Westphalens. Scchszehnter Jahrgang. Neue Folge : Sechster Jahrgang.
Bonn, 1850. (Appendix ? pp. 33-37.)
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 317].
72. Leach, W. E. — " Crustaceology." ' The Edinburgh Encyclopsedia,' conducted by David Brewster,
LL.D., &c. Vol. vii. Edinburgh, mdcccxxx. (The issue of the work las';ed from 1810 to
1830. Leaches article is referred to by Desmarest, 1825, and others, with the date 1813-
1814.) Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 85].
73. Leydig, Franz. — " Amphipoden und Isopoden. Anatomische und zoologische Bemerkungen."
Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Zoologic, xxx. Bd., Suj)pl. pp. 235-274, mit Tafeln ix.-xii.
Leipzig, 1878. Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 480].
74. Leydig, Franz. — " Beitriige und Bemerkungen zur Wiirttemb. Fauna." Wiirttemberg. naturwiss.
Jahreshefte, 27ter Jahrg. p. 269.
Quoted from Bovallius [15, p. 11].
36*
278 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTERRANEAN
75. LuDWiG. — ' Zeitschrift fiir die ges.immten Naturwissenscliaften,' Bd. liv. (3 FolgCj Bd. vi.), p. 453.
Berlin^ 1881. Quoted from Wrzesuiowski [424, p. 714].
76. Lyell, Sir Charles. — ' Principles of Geology.' Twelfth edition. 2 vols. London, 1875.
17. Milne-Edwards, H. — ' Histoire naturellc des Crustaces.'' Tome iii. Paris, 1840.
78. MoNiEZ, R. — " Faune des Eaux souterraines du Deiiai-tement du Nord et en particulier de la ville
de Lille." Extrait de la Revue Biologique du Nord de la France. Tome i., 1888-1889, OS pp.
Lille, 1889.
79. MiJLLER, Fritz. — " Facts and Arguments for Darwin." With additions by the Author. Translated
from the German by W. S. Dallas, F.L.S., &c., with illustrations. London : Murray, 1869.
80. NusBAUM, J. — "Zur Morphologic der Isopodeufiisse." Biol. Ceutralbl. xi. (1891) pp. 353-356.
(Abstract in the ' Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society,' part 5, October 1891, p. 593.)
80*. Norman, A. M. (and Stebbing, T. R. R.).— See Stebbing [106].
81 . Packard, A. S., Jun. — " The Mammoth Cave and its Inhabitants. On the Crustaceans and Insects."
American Naturalist, v. pp. 744-701, 1871. (Republished with other papers as 'The Mammoth
Cave and its Inhabitants,' Salem, 1872.)
82. Packard, A. S.J Jun., and Putnam, F. W. — ' The Mammoth Cave and its Inhabitants.' Salem,
1872.
82*. Packard, A. S., Jun., and Cope, E. \).—See Copi!, E. D. [31].
83. Packard, A. S. — " The Cave Fauna of North America, with remarks on the Anatomy of the Brain
and Origin of the Blind Species." National Academy of Sciences, vol. iv.. First Memoir (read
Nov. 9tli, 1886), pp. 3-156, pis. i.-xxvii.
84. Parker, T. J. — " The Skeleton of the New-Zealand Crayfishes [Palinurus and Paranephrops)."
Studies in Biology for New-Zealand Students, No. 4. Wellington, 1889.
85. Parona, C. — " Di due Crostacei cavernicoli [Niphargus puteamis, Koch, e Titanethes feneriensis,
n. sp.) delle grotte di Monte Fenere (Val Sesia)." Aiti della Societ;\ Italiana di Scienze
naturali, xxiii. pp. 42-61. Milan, 1880.
Quoted from Moniez [78, p. 43].
86. Plateau, Fklix. — " Recherches sur les Crustac& d'eau douce de Belgique." P Partie. Mcmoires
Courounes Acad. Roy. de Belgique, xxxiv. 1808. 1 plate.
Quoted from Humbert [02, p. 288] .
87. Plessis-Gouret, G. du. — " Essai sur la Faune profonde des lacs de la Suisse." Nouveaux Memoires
de la Societe Helvetique des Sciences naturelles, vol. xxix. 1885.
Quoted from Wrzesuiowski [124, j). 715].
88. Pratz, Ed. — " Tiber eiuige im Grundwasser lebende Thiere." Beitrag zur Kenntniss dcr unter-
irdiscliea Crustaceen. Dissertatio iuauguralis. Petersburg, 1806. 64 pp., 4 plates.
Quoted from Moniez [78, p. 47].
88*. Putnam, F. W. (and Packard, A. S., Jun.).— See Packard [82].
89. RouGEMONT, Philippe de.- — ' Naturgeschichte von Gammarus puteanus, Koch.' Inaug. Diss. 8vo.
40 pp. Miiiichen, 1875. (Republished in French, with additions, under the title 'Etude de la
faune des eaux privees de lumiere.' 4°, avec 5 planches. Paris, 1876.)
Quoted from Humbert [62, p. 290].
yO. Rougexiont, Philippe de. — ' Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences naturelles de Neuchatel,' vol. xi.
February 1879. Quoted fi'om Wrzcsniowski [124, p. 713].
91. Sars, G. O, — ' Histoire Naturelle des Crustaces d'eau douce de Norvege.' 1' livraison : Les
Malacostraces. Avec 10 planches. Christiania, 1867.
92. ScHOBL, Joseph. — " Typhloniscus : eine neue bliude Gattung der Crustacea Isopoda." Sitzungsb.
d. k. Akad. d. W. math.-naturw. CI., xl. Bd., no. 9, 1800, pp. 279-330, plates i.-x. Wien.
CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 279
93. ScHiODTE, J. C. — " Uuders^gelser over Iluledyreue i Krain og Isti'ien." Oversigt over dot
Kongelige danske Videusk. Selskabs Forhandliuger for 18-17 (Kjlibenhavn, 18^8), pp. 75-81.
Quoted from Wrzesuiowski [124, p. 708] .
9-1. ScHioDTE, J. C. — " Specimeu Faunse subterranese." " Bidrag til den underjordiske Fauna." Det
Koiigelige Danske Videuskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. Femte Rsekke. Naturvidenskabelig og
luatheuiatik Afdeeling, Andet Bind (Kjobenhavn, 1851), pp. 1-39, tab. i.-iv. (Translated by
N. Wallicli : Trans. Ent. Soc. London (2), i. pp. 1-24.)
Quoted from Stabbing, &c. [108, p. 233].
95. ScHioDTE, J. C— "Cm den i England opdagede Art af Hulekrebs af Shegten iVz'^/mr//i<.9." Oversigt
over det Kgl. Danske V'idensk. Selskabs Forbaudlinger (Kjobenhavn, 1855), pp. 349-351.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 287].
96. Schneider, Robert. — "Der unterirdisclie Gammarus von Claustbal [Gammarus pulex, var. sub-
terraneus)." Sitzuugsbcrichte der konigl. preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin,
Bd. xlix. 3. December, 1885.
Quoted from Wresniowski [124, p. 715].
97. Schneider, Robert. — " Ein bleieher Asellus in den Grnben von Freiberg im Erzgbirge [Asellux
aquaiicus, \iiv. freibergensis) ." L. c. pp. 723-711. 1887.
Quoted from Moniez [78, p. 52].
98. ScHRANK, F. VON P. — ' Enumeratio Inseetorum Austria.' Augustae Vindelicorum, mdcclxxxi.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 51].
99. Semper, K.\RL. — " The Natural Conditions of Existence as they affect Animal Life." The Inter-
national Scientific Series, vol. xxxi. London, 1881.
100. Sill, Victor. — " Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Crustaceen, Arachniden, und Myriopoden Sieben-
biirgeus." Verhandl. und Mittheil. der siebenbiirgishen Vereines fiir Naturw. zu Hermannstadt,
xii. Jahrg., 1861 ; no. 1, Jauuar 18G1, p. 3.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 1625].
101. Simon, Eugene. — ' Journal de Zoologie,' iv. pp. 114-116.
Quoted from Zool. Record for 1875 (Dr. von Martens).
102. Smith, S. I. — "Dredging in Lake Superior under the direction of the U.S. Lake Survey."
Number xi. pp. 373, 374.
"Notice of the Invcrtebrata dredged in Lake Superior in 1871 by the U.S. Lake Survey."
By S. I. Smith and A. E. Verrill. Number xii. pp. 418-454. The American Journal of
Science and Arts. New Haven, 1871.
103. Smith, S. I.— "The Crustacea of the Freshwaters of the United States," &c. Extract from the
Report of Prof. S. F. Baird, Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries. Part ii. Report for 1872-
1873. Washington, 1874.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 34].
104. Smith, S. I. — "The Crustaceans of the Caves of Kentucky and Indiana." American Journal ot
Science and Arts, vol. i.x. June 1875.
105. Smith, S. I. — " Crustacea of the ' Albatross ' Dredgings in 1883." American Journal of Science,
vol. xxviii. pp. 53-56. July 1884.
106. Stebbing, T. R. R., and Nokman, .\. M. — " On the Crustacea Isopoda of the ' Lightning,' ' Por-
cupine,' and ' Valorous ' Expeditions." Transactions of the Zoological Society, vol. xii. part iv.
pp. 77-141, plates xvi.-xxvii. London, 1886.
107. SteBbixg, T. R. R. — " On some new Exotic Amphipoda from Singapore and from New Zealand."
Loc. cit. vol. xii. part vi. 1887, pp. 199-210, plates xxxviii., xxxix.
108. Stebbing, T. R. R. — "Report on tlie Amphipoda collected by H. M.S. ' Challenger ' during the
years 1873-1876." Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M.S. ' Challenger •
280 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEEEANEAN
during the years 1873-1876 : Zoology, vol. xxiv. Two volumes of Text and one volume of 212
Plates and a Map. Loudon, &c., 1888.
109. Tellkampf, Theodor G. — " Beschreibung einigcr neuer in der Mammuth-Holile in Kentucky
aufgefundener Gattungen von Gliederthieren." Arcliiv fiir Naturgeschiclite, Zelinter Jahrgang,
Erster Band. Berlin, 1844.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 208].
110. Thomson, G. M. — "Notes on, and recent additions to, the New Zealand Crustacean Fauna."
Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, vol. xxi. pp. 259-268. Wellington, N.Z., 1889.
111. Thomson, G. M., and Chilton, Chas. — "Critical List of the Crustacea Malacostraca of New
Zealand. Part I." Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, vol. xviii. pp. 141-159.
Wellington, N.Z., 1886.
112. Valette St. George, Adolphe de la. — 'De Gammaro puteano.' Dissertatio inauguralis (Berolini,
1857), pp. 5-16, with 2 plates.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 304].
113. Vejdovsky, Fr. — ' Thierische Organismen der Bruunenwasser von Prag.' Prague, 1882, pp. 66,
8 plates. Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 715].
114. Wallace, A. R. — 'The Malay Archipelago.' Seventh edition. London, 1880.
115. Wallace, A. R. — 'Darwinism : an Exposition of the Theory of Natural Selection, with some of
its Applications.' London, 1889.
116. Weber. Max. — " Uber Asellus cavaticus, Schiodte." Zoologischer Anzeiger, vol. ii. p. 253.
117. Weber, Max. — "Uber einige neue Isopoden der Niederlandischen Fauna." Tijdschrift der
Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging, Deel 5, p. 17J.
Quoted from Bovallius [15, p. 11].
118. Weber, Max. — "Uber den Bau und die Thatigkeit der sogenannten Leber der Crustaceen."
Archiv fiir mikroskopische Anatomic, xvii. (Bonn, 1880 ?), pp. 385-457, pis. xxxvi.-
xxxviii. Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 525].
119. Weismann, August. — 'Essays upon Heredity and kindred Biological Problems.' Authorized
translation. Oxford (Clarendon Press), 1889.
119*. Westwood, J. O. (and Bate, C. Spence). — See Bate [4].
120. Westwood, J. O. — 'Annals and Magazine of Natural History,' vol. xii., 2nd series, London,
1853, p. 44. 'Also Proceedings Linnean Society,' no. 51, p. 218, London, 19tli April,
1853
121. White, Adam. — 'A Popular History of British Crustacea; comprising a familiar Account of
their Classification and Habits.' London, 1857.
Quoted from Stebbing [108, p. 304].
122. Wiedersheim, R. — "Beitriige zur Keuntniss der Wiirttemberg. Hohlenfauna." Verhandl. d.
Wiirzburger physik.-med. Gesellsehaft, Neue Folge, Bd. iv. Wiirzburg, 1873.
Quoted from Humbert [62, p. 289].
123. Wrzesniowski, August. — " O trzech kielzacli podziemnych." De tribus Crustaceis Amphipodis
subterraneis. Pamietnik Physiographische Deukschriftcn, Bd. viii., 3. Abtheilung (M^arschau,
1888), pp. 221-830, Taf. vi.-xvi.
124. Wrzesniowski, August. — "Uber drei unterirdische Gammariden." Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaft-
liche Zoologie, L. 4, pp. 600-725, plates xxviii.-xxxii. Leipzig, 1890. (A translation, with
some additions and alterations, of the previous work.)
125. Zenkeii, J. C. — "De Gammari pulicis, Fabr., historia naturali atque sanguinis cii'cnitu com-
mentatio." Jeuce, 1832.
Quoted from Wrzesniowski [124, p. 707].
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND. 281
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Plate XVI.
Phreatoicus assimilis.
Fig. 1. Side view of the whole animal, a female, x 12.
3. Upper antenna.
3. Lower antenna.
4. Upper lip. x 58.
5. Outer convex surface of mandible with palp attached.
6. Left mandible.
7. Lower lip. x 58.
8. Fii-st maxilla. x 58.
9. Second maxilla. x 58.
10& 11. MaxiUipedes.
Plate XVII.
Phreatoicus assimilis.
Fig. 1-3. First appendage of the perseon.
4. Second ditto.
5. Propodos produced along the base of dactylos.
6. Fourth appendage of the peroeou.
7. The same, distal extremity enlarged.
8-9. Fifth and sixth appendages of the person.
10. First pleopod. X 19.
11. Second pleopod, of male. X 19.
12. Third pleopod. X 19.
13. Side view of end of pleon, sliowing the telson ana uropoda. x 19.
Plate XVIII.
Phreatoicus Ujpicus.
Fig. 1. Side view of the whole animal, a female. X 6.
2. The antennie, side view, showing the upper antenna and the peduncle of the lower
antenna. X 35.
3. Extremity of the left mandible, much compressed. x 180.
4. Lower lip. X 58.
5. First maxilla. X 58.
6. Second maxilla. X 58.
7. Leg of the first pair, of female. X 19.
8. Extremity of the same. X 45.
9. Leg of the second pair, x 19.
10. Leg of the si.xth pair. X 19.
11. Lower margins of the first five segments of pleon. x 19.
12. Side view of end of the pleon, showing the telson and uropoda. x 19.
282 DE. C. CHILTON ON THE SUBTEERANEAN
Plate XIX.
Cruregens font anus.
Fig. ]. Side view of the whole animal. X 12.
2. Antennae, from above. X 45.
3. End of upper antenna. X 1 80.
4. Portion of lower antenna. X 180.
5. Basal portion of lower antenna, from below. X 45.
6. Upper lip. X 120.
7. Mandibles. X 120.
8. Mandibles and end of masillipedes, seen from below and partly from the side, x 120.
9. First maxilla. X 56.
10. Portion of same. X 120.
11. Second maxilla and lower lip. X 120.
12. Lower lip. X 120.
13. Second maxilla. X 120.
14. Maxillipedes, distal portion, from below, x 120.
15. Leg of first pair, outside view. X 30.
16. Portion of the same, inside view, x 30.
17. Leg of second pair, x 30.
18. Palm of same. X 83.
19. Leg of fourth pair. X 30.
20. Pleon, with telson and uropoda, from above. X 30.
21. First pleopod, from below, x 30.
22. One of the posterior pleopoda. X 45.
23. Uropoda, from above. X 30.
Plate XX.
Crangonyx compactus.
Fig. 1. Side view of the whole animal. X 12.
2. Upper antenna. X 45.
3. Portion of flagellum of same. X 120.
4. Lower antenna. X 45.
5. Upper lip. X 120.
6. Right mandible. X 70.
7. Extremity of same. X 240.
8. Extremity of right mandible of another specimen. X 240.
9. Extremity of left mandible (figure inverted) . X 240.
10. Lower lip. x 120.
11. First maxilla. X 120.
12. Extremity of middle lobe of same. X 350.
13. Extremity of palp of same. X 210.
14. Second maxilla. X 120.
15. Extremity of inner lobe of same. X 350
16. Maxillipedes, from below. X 70.
17. Extremity of same, from above. X 120.
18. Inner lobe of same, x 120.
CRUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND
283
Fig. 19. Outer lobe of same, x 120.
20. First griathopod. X 30.
21. Second gnathopod. X 30.
22. First ])erfeo])0(l. X 30.
23. Fourth perseopod. X 30.
24. First pleopod. X 30, with " coupliug-spines " more enlarged.
25. Second pleopod. x 30.
26. Third pleopod. X 30.
27. First uropod. x 30.
28. Second uropod. x 30.
29. Third uropod. X 30.
30. Telsou. X 30.
Plate XXI.
Gammarus fragilis.
Fig. 1. Side view of whole animal, x 12.
2. Upper antenna, x 30.
3. Lower antenna. x 30.
i. Upper lip. X 70.
5. Left mandible, showing palp and cutting-edges only, x 70.
G. E.\tremity of same. X 120.
7. Extremity of right mandible, from above, compressed. x 70.
8. The same seen in profile from below. X 70.
9. Lower lip. x 70.
10. First maxilla of right side. x 70.
11. Extremity of palp of same, x 120.
12. Extremity of palp of first maxilla of left side. x 120.
13. Second maxilhi. x 70.
14. ^laxillipedes, from below. X 45.
15. The same, from above. X 45.
16. First gnathopod, inner side, from a large specimen. x 30.
17. Second gnathopod, outer side, from smaller speeiiiien. x 30.
18. First perseopod. x 30.
19. Fourth perseopod, basal joints and extremity, x 30.
20. Extremity of same. X 70, with " auditory seta'' more magnified.
21. Third pleopod. x 30, with '■ coupling-spines " more magnified.
22. First uropod. x 30.
23. Second uropod. x 30.
24. Third uropod. x 30.
25. Telson. x 30.
Plate XXII.
('uUiopius subterraneun, c^ .
Y\g. 1. Side view of male. x 12.
2. Peduncle of upper antenna, x 30.
3. Calceolus from the same, highly magnified.
4. Lower antenna, x 30.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI.
37
284 ON THE SUBTEREANEAN CEUSTACEA OF NEW ZEALAND.
Fig. 5. Upper lip. x 58.
G. Left mandible. X 58.
7. Extremity of same. X 1'20.
8. Extremity of right maudiljle. X 120
9. Portion of lower lip. X 58.
10. First maxilla, x 45.
11. Extremity of middle lobe of same, x 180.
12. Extremity of palp of same, right (?) side. X 180.
13. Extremity of palp of first maxilla of other (? left) side. X 180.
(These two drawings, 12 and 13, were aecidentally made one from above and one from
below, hence they both face in the same direction.)
14. Second maxilla. x 120.
15. Maxillipedc, from below, x 45.
16. Extremity of the same, from above. X 45.
Plate XXIII.
Calliopius subterruneus, (^ .
Fig. 1. First gnathopod, outer side. X 19.
2. Extremity of the same, inner side, x 19.
3. Second gnathopod, outer side. X 19.
4. Extremity of the same, inner side, x 19.
5. First perseopod. x 19.
6. Third perseopod. X 19.
7. First uropod. x 19.
8. Second uropod. X 19.
9. Third uropod. x 19.
Calliopius suhterraneus, 9 .
10. Lower lip. x 120.
11. Maxillipedc, from above, x 120.
12. First gnathopod. X 45.
13. Extremity of the same. X 120.
14. Second gnathopod. X 19.
15. Extremity of same. X 120.
16. Side view of posterior end of pleon, showing the uropoda and telson. x 45.
17. Third uropod and telson, from above. X 45.
18. Extremity of middle lobe of first maxilla of a small specimen (an immature male?),
showing some of the setse only, x 445.
I
Trans Linn Soc Zool, 5i:R.2.Voi..Vl.PL,16.
C Chilton del
HarJiirt imp
PHREATOICUS A&^m[U^,ChiUon, sprno^
.JOL CiKR
^ ' ^^'/rM^rftf^'
C, Chilton, liel
PHREATOIGUS ASSIMILIS , C/z../^,;,
, Sp. I-U)V
CChilfco-n
Tr.^ns.L™k, Soc Zool , Ser.2 -Yol.YI.Pl.IS,
PHREATOICUS TYPICUS , 6%jZro
ro
CChiloon
rp.AMS.LiNN Soc.ZooL Skr 2 Vo: , VI Pl/19.
C Ohilcon .
Trails. Linn, Soc Zool.Ser 2. Vol .VI ?l 20.
'1 \ , '^:y]W
CCKilfaon. del .
CR^.NGONYX COMPACTUS, ^A^Z-6o
Hantiiir;- .itnio
rv
T-RANs Linn Soc Zool Ser 2-V'ol VI Pl, 21
C OiuLon del
Hai\V.ar& imp
GAMMARUS J'RAOJIA 6 .C/i,
Clv.lbi
IhjViss Lin"n Soc Zool [ver.2Vol. .Vi Pl,22
C Chilton del
CALLIOPIUS SUBTEREAKEUS ,GhvlLorv
: a til". AT-, •."■i^
C C'hilbo:'. dsi
CALLIOPIUS SUBTERRAI^EU^ "v
Har.Kart- :n\ji
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMORANDA CONCERNING TRANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing hoth Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and 6s. to FeUows ; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
wrapper) : —
When Price to the
Volume. Published. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Sebies. — Zoology.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 ,
Part III. 1876 1 8 0 ,
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 ,
Part V. 1877 0 18 0
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 .
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 ,
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 ,
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 ,
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 .
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XV. 1885 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
Part XVIII. 1888 0 2 0 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
0 2 0
When Price to the
Volume. Published. Public.
£ S. d.
Second Sekies. — Zoology (continued).
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0 . . . .
Part II. 1884 1 12 0 . . . .
Part III. 1885 1 10 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . . . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0 . . . .
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0 . . . .
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 . . . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 . . . .
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0 . . . .
Part II. 1888 0 5 0 . . . .
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1890 0 12 0 . . . .
Part V. 1890 0 6 0
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 ....
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 ....
Part IX. 1892 0 12 0 . . . .
Part X. 1893 1 8 0 . . . .
Part XI. 1894 0 2 6 . . . .
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 . . . .
Part II. 1894 1 11 0 ....
Price to
Fellows.
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PART 3.
^"T' ~
THE
TRANSACTIONS
OF
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
ON A FEESHWATEK SCHIZOPOD FROM TASMANIA.
BY
GEOUGE M. THOMSON, F.L.S.
L O N D O N
PllINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FBANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLB AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
Aiffjii^t 1894.
[ 285 ]
III. On a Freshwater ScUzopod from Tasmania. By George M. Thomson, F.L.S.
Eead 2nd ?\"ovember, 1893.
(Plates XXIV.-XXVI.)
In a paper read before the Royal Society of Tasmania on November 14th, 1892, I have
given a brief account of the discovery of this interesting Crustacean, Anaspides tasmanke*,
and have described it as the type, not only of a new genus, but of a new family of
Schizopoda. In some respects, indeed, the structure of this animal is so unique
as to entitle it to even higher specific rank ; but in many of its characters it is found
to be allied, though somewhat remotely, to the Euphausiidce of Sars {Thysanopodidce
of Bronn's ' Thierreich ' ). Owing to long isolation it has undergone very profound
modification.
I found this species in a pool near the summit of Mt. Wellington, Tasmania — that is,
at a height of over iOOO feet. The pool was in a small crevice only two or three feet
deep, but seemed to have somewhat extensive ramifications among the rocky masses of
which the upper part of the mountain is composed. The shrimps which came into the
more open part were mostly small ; the larger ones appeared to hide in the deeper
crevices of the j)Ool and would not come out while anyone was near.
I obtained only a few specimens at the time of my visit (January, 1892), but Mr. L.
Rodway, of Hol^art, was kind enough to make an expedition to the top of the mountain
at my request on May 24th, and obtained a further supply from under the thick coat of
ice which then covered the pool. He secured them by setting a small baited muslin
net, but found the larger specimens very shy, as they tried to get the bait through the
meshes of the net without venturing inside. Still he was enabled to obtain both
males and females, the former of which were not included in my own collection.
Unfortunately, none of the specimens in my possession are well preserved, so that it
has been very diflicult to make out their anatomical structure, and impossible to arrive
at several important details.
In the pools and swampy ground round the spot where these were taken, Mr. Rodway,
and subsequently Mr. Morton, F.L.S. , of Hobart, obtained specimens of a small
Amphipod which I have described in the paper referred to as Niphargus montanus.
This species, like Anaspides, is evidently a very old type, belonging, apparently,
to a genus hitherto described only from Europe and composed chiefly of underground
* This form, was originally described by me under the name of Aaaspis, but as my friend the Rev. T. E. E.
Stebbing informs me that this name is pre-occupied, I have altered it to Anaspides, at his suggestion, so that
the name of the new order may not have to be changed.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 38
286 ME. GEOEGE M. THOMSOIS' ON A FEESHWATEE
species. Among these was also found a single specimen of Phreatoicus australis, Chilton,
previously only obtained from water springs and marshy ground on Mt. Kosciusko in
New South Wales at a height of 5700 feet. The type species, P. typlcus, Chilton, is
eyeless, and occurs in the subterranean waters of Canterbury, New Zealand. The genus
FJireatoicus, as Dr. Chilton has shown *, is an archaic one ; it is, indeed, a remarkably
generalized form of Isopod.
I have given the new shrimp the following systematic position in the above paper,
the name Anaspides being suggested by the total absence of carapace.
Tribe SCEIZOPODA.
Eamily ANASPID^.
Carapace wanting ; the cephalon and all the segments of the body distinct. Maxilli-
peds and succeeding seven pairs of limbs uniform in general structure, adapted for
walking, furnished with external lamellar branchise. No egg-pouch (?). Pleopoda with
well-developed natatory exopodites; endopodites of first and second pleopoda specially
modified in the males as copulatory appendages. Uropoda normal. Auditory organ in
the base of first pair of antennae f. Peveloj)ment ?
Genus Anaspides.
Anaspis, mihi. Trans. Roy. Soc. of Tasmania for 1892, p. 51.
Integument thin and flexible. Whole body divided into 15 distinct (subequal) segments,
viz. one cephalic, eight thoracic, and six, abdominal. Eyes well developed. First
antennpB with 3-jointed peduncle and two flagella ; second antennfe with well-developed
scale on the second joint. Mandibles with 3-jointed palps. First maxillae 2-branched ;
second pair 4-branched. Maxillipeds pediform, with two rudimentary branchiae
projecting externally from the coxa ; exopodite small and rudimentary. Legs generally
uniform in structure, 7- or 8-jointed, each furnished with a claw-like dactylos. The coxa
of each leg (except those of the last pair) bears two external lamellar branchiae which
project forward, and the basos bears a well-developed natatory exopodite. Pleopoda with
a rudimentary endopodite in the females and in the 3rd-5th pairs in the males. First
pair in the males with the endopodite developed into a lamelliform organ (penis ?) ;
second pair with the same organ produced into a clasping-process. Telson short, rounded.
Uropoda with both plates subequal ; inner wdth a slight longitudinal median ridge ;
outer with an imperfect transverse articulation near the middle.
External Form.
The most remarkable and characteristic features of the body (PI. XXIV. fig. 1) are (1)
its separation into 15 distinct segments without any trace of a carapace, thus recalling
* " On a new and peculiar Preshwater Isopod from Mount Kosciusko,'' by Chas. Chilton, M.A., D.Sc. Eeeords
of the Australian Museum, vol. i. no. 8, p. 149,
t This character is not in the original diagnosis.
SCHIZOPOD FROM TASMANIA. 287
tlie appearance of an Ampliij)Ocl, and (2) the external lamellate brancliite of the thoracic
appendages.
The cephalic segment is short and is produced into a triangular subacute rostrum
(PI. XXIV. fig. 2) ; the front margin, which is slightly hollowed out for the eye-sockets,
is entire and rounded ; the sides are not produced far downward, but leave the tumid
basal joint of the mandibles exposed.
The eight thoracic and the six abdominal somites are distinctly articulated one to
another, but there is much room for overlapping between them, so that a considerable
power of flexion on the dorsal line is provided. In many specimens the posterior margin
has its overlapi)ing portion distinctly marked out from the rest of the segmeat by its
much paler colour.
The first thoracic segment is only about half as long as the cephalon ; its lateral
portion, which extends further down than the sides of the preceding segment, is separated
ofi" l)y an oblique line into a distinct cpimeron, which is widest anteriorly. The other
thoracic segments are rather short, so that the thorax and cephalon together only equal
in length the whole of the abdominal portion. The sides of all the segments are rounded
and do not extend far down ; there is no trace of epimeral marking, but the margins are
thicker and more strongly chitinized than the remainder of the segment. Viewed
externally, the lateral margins of the thoracic segments are nearly hidden by the branchiae,
which project almost to the bases of the second antennae, and by the plumose exopodites
of the 2nd to 6th pairs of pera;opoda, which are produced upward and backward on
the sides of the body.
The colour of these animals is a brownish grey, ajoproximating closely to the sides and
bottom of the pool in which they were found. The iutegument is very thin and some-
what tough, thinner indeed than that of any other free-swimming Crustacean with which
I am acquainted. This is no douljt due in part to the semi-subterranean abode in which
the animals occur. The external layer of the integument is transparent, and underneath
it are cells containing the pigment to whicli the colour is due. There is no calcareous
matter in the integument, neither nitric nor glacial acetic acid producing any trace of
effervescence, or indeed appearing to alter it in any way. Strong nitric acid alters
the pigment to a yellowish colour and rapidly dissolves it. The pigment-cells are
somewhat hexagonal in form, and can be removed in a thin layer, presenting a tesselated
appearance.
Appendages.
The eye-peduncles are short and stout, and are directed obliquely outward ; they reach
beyond the extremity of the basal joint of the second antennae, Imt not so far as the
extremity of the basal joint of the first pair. Each peduncle is 1-jointed, cylindrical in
form, and very slightly enlarged toward the extremity; its length is about twice its
diameter. The ocelli, which are very numerous, occupy about the upper third of the
stalk ; just below them, particularly on the outer side of the peduncle, are a very few
short stiff hairs.
Anterior antennce (PI. XXIV figs. 3 and 4). — These organs are normally formed. The
38*
288 ME. GEORGE M. THOMSON ON A FEESHWATER
peduncle is 3-jointecl, with the joints broad and somewhat flattened ; the first and second
joints are subequal in length, the basal slightly the largest and widest, and having a
longitudinal suture tending somewhat obliquely outward along its upper surface ; the
second joint also bears a slight longitudinal groove on its upper surface, and is fringed on
its outer margin with plumose setae. The third joint, w^hich is also similarly fringed on
its outer margin, is broader at its distal than its proximal end, and carries two whip-like
flagella. The outer flagellum is from two-thirds to three-fouvths the length of the body,
and is divided into very numerous articulations. In the yovmgest specimen examined,
the body of which was only about 9 mm. long, there were 36 articulations on the outer
and only 8 on the inner flagellum; but in adult specimens the number varies from
70 up to 92, Avhich was the largest number observed. The articulations are furnished
with a few short spinose setse on both sides. On the ten or twelve joints nearest the
peduncle the setse are long and plumose, but they tend to become shorter and more
simple on the joints nearer the extremity. On all the joints but those few setose ones
nearest the peduncle there are blunt hairs or cilia of a very characteristic appearance,
which are probably sensory organs.
The inner flagellum is about one-fourth the length of the outer, and usually consists
of about one-fourth the number of articulations ; the joints nearest the base have more
or less plumose setse, those further out have the setse simple. But in the male this
inner flagellum is modified in a curious manner (PI. XXVI. fig. 12). The fifth and
sixth joints are much dilated ; the former bears a large tuft of slightly phimose setse,
while the latter cai'ries two large stout setse, w^hich are rugose in their distal half; each
is also apparently furnished with a nerve-fibre. The first seven joints also bear a
number of short, curved, finger-like setse, all more or less covered with rugosities, so as to
resemble a round rasp or file ; these rugosities are arranged in an annular manner and
appear to consist of minute stiff hairs. These thickened processes are scattered
somewhat irregularly, there being a tuft of about six or seven on the basal joint, then
isolated ones or in twos or threes on the succeeding joints, about seven on the sixth
joint, and three on the seventh; they are directed toward the upper surface of the
flagellum, w^hile the long setse of the proximal joints are all on the lower surface. The
remaining joints are simple, and carry short simple setse as in the corresponding organ in
the female. These peculiar processes in the male are probably sensory in their function ;
they certainly form a very distinct sexual modification.
The auditory cavity is placed in the basal joint of the jieduncle of the first antennae,
its roof being formed by the flattened upper surface. It communicates with the water
outside by a duct which opens at the extremity of the joint under a fringe of setse.
Second antennce (PI. XXIV. fig. 5). — The peduncle consists of four (perhaps five) joints,
and bears a long flexible flagellum ; all the joints are more or less flattened out laterally,
but the upperside of the first and second joints is produced into a longitudinal crest or
ridge, which gives the base a somewhat triangular section. The first and second joints are
short and subequal in length ; both bear on their outer extremities a crovm of short spines,
and the second joint has also a tuft of fine setse on its inner extremity. This joint also
bears an oval plate (the scaphocerite of Spence Bate) fringed with long plumose setse.
SCHIZOPOD FEOM TASMANIA. 289
This appencla^^e lias a uniformly smooth margin, but it is slightly raised into a median
ridge, especially in its basal portion. The third joint, which is subequal with and
nearly covered by the scaphocerite, is slightly longer than broad, flattened and thickened
on each margin, where it bears a fringe of plumose setse, those on the inside being the
longest. The fourth joint is shorter and narrower than the third, and is also similarly
furnished with plumose setae ; at its exti-emity it bears a very short joint, which,
though somcAvhat narrower than the one bearing it, is considerably broader than the
joint of the flagellum which succeeds it. It is probably the fifth joint of the peduncle
Avhich is thus almost merged in the fourth.
The flagellum is not quite tAvo-thirds as long as the body of the animal, and is
composed of very numerous (45 to 60) joints. Each joint bears at its extremity on both
sides a number of seta3, those at the proximal end being long and plumose, hut dimin-
ishing in size and becoming smootli on the more remote joints ; the last joint is blunt
and bears numerous short simple setoe.
The oral aperture (PI. XXV. fig. 10) as seen from below is well defined. The dipper
lip is a thick fleshy appendage, rounded in front and widening out below. It seems
to have very considerable flexibility and power of movement, and is strongly supplied
with muscular bands. Close behind it lie the cutting-edges of the mandibles (PL XXIV.
figs. 10, 11, and 12), which are similar on both sides. These organs are strongly
developed, and are so placed as to close the mouth-opening with their exposed side.
The cutting-edge is furnished with a double row of strongly indurated teeth, while
placed nearly at right angles and interior to it is a ridge fringed with short bristles,
culminating in a strongly-produced grinding tubercle with an oval finely-toothed margin.
Tlie palp is 3-jointed, and when at rest projects forward between the bases of the first
pair of antennae : the basal joint is broader than long, and furnished with a few short
plumose setsB on each side ; the second joint is much the longest, is three or four times as
long as broad, and bears a tuft of setse at its upper distal extremity ; near its base on the
lower side it is produced into a short triangular tooth, while on the distal two-thirds of the
same side it hears numerous short setse arranged in two rows and leaving a long narrow
groove, into which apparently the third joint can be folded and so completely protected ;
the third joint is short, slightly broadened towards the outer end, and densely fringed with
short seta?. All the setse on this organ are furnished with very short hairs, which
almost make them appear serrated. The base of the mandible is widely dilated for the
reception of the powerful muscles by which it is moved.
The under-lip (PL XXIV. fig. 9), placed immediately behind the mandibles, is a deeply
2-cleft fleshy plate, rounded on the outer margins, and finely fringed on the upper and
inner with minute close-set hairs. The two sides appear to be capable of opening widely
apart.
First maxilUe (PL XXIV. fig. 6). — These organs are 2-branched; the external branch,
which is strongly chitinous, bears on its inner oblique margin a double row of serrated
spinose teeth, which are brown-coloured and strongly chitinized ; the inner branch is
Heshy, smaller, more rounded, fringed Avith sliort plumose setse, and seems to have but
little power of movement.
290 ME. GEOEGE M. THOMSON ON A FEESHWATER
Second maxillce (PL XXIV. figs. 7 and 8).— These are thick, fleshy, and 4-branched,
each branch being 1-jointed. The broad basal portion which bears these branches
is rounded on its outer edge, which bears a few small spines ; at its upper and outer
extremity it has a small crown of setse at the articulation of the outer branch. This
basal portion is longitudinally a little bent on itself, so that while the two outer branches
on each side work against each other, the two inner lie more in the same plane and move
obliquely one against another. The first (outer) branch is short and rounded, and, as is
the case with the second branch, ends in a great number of setse, which are somewhat
curved inwards and are toothed along their inner margins. The third branch resembles
the narrow second one in form, but the setae are not toothed. The fourth (innermost)
branch is setose along its inner margin, and is expanded on its outer into a thin rounded
lamella which partly covers the third branch. These four setose plates are evidently
for the purpose of preventing particles of food from escaping from the oral aperture.
3IaxilU])eds (PL XXIV. figs. 13, 14, and 15).— These organs are distinctly pediform,
differing from the succeeding pairs of legs only in the degree of their development. They
are 7-jointed. The coxal joint bears on its outer side two lamellar bi-anchite, each of
which is obliquely crossed near its base by a tine line of articulation ; the upper of these
is more than twice as broad as the lower, which is long and very narrow. On its inner
side the coxa bears two small lameUar organs fringed all round with setae, the inner and
narrower of which stands alongside, but at right angles to, the outer. These setose
plates serve to close the oral aperture behind. The upper portion of this joint bears at its
outer extremity a slender appendage which is subequal in length to the rest of the
joint. This exopodite appears at first sight to be unjointed, but is seen to bear a minute
articulation at its apex.
The basos is Ions, and is rounded on the anterior or outer side, while the keeled inner
side bears a double row of plumose setae. The ischium, which is similarly shaped in
section, is about half as long, and the meros is as long, as the basos. The two succeeding
joints form a distinct — and in spirit-specimens a sharp — geniculation with the meros,
being bent in towards the middle line of the body ; they are both somewhat shorter
than the meros, and are rather densely setose. The propodos is more flattened than the
carpos, and is fringed with numerous curved hairs on both margins, while the dactylos
ends in three powerful hooked claws, which are almost hidden among setae.
These organs I have termed maxillipeds, as in position they correspond to those
appendages in other Crustacea; but they might more appropriately be called the
first pair of loalk'mg legs.
The next seven pairs of legs resemble the preceding pair in general structure, but differ
considerably in detail ; they all want the setose lamellae on the inside of the coxal joint,
which indeed appear to act partly as oral organs, but several of them have a small pointed
lobe which may be a homologous development. The exopodites and branchiae are
differently developed in all the limbs, while the basal joint is shorter than in the first
pair. In the second to the sixth pairs, the long plumose exopodites apparently serve as
natatory organs and facilitate progression though the water.
In the second pair of legs (PL XXIV. fig. 16) the joints are similar in number, shape,
and relative length, as well as in distribution of setae, to those of the first pair. The
SCHIZOPOD FEOM TASJIANIA. , 291
lamellar branchiae are, however, much broader and are subequal in size, the lower one
being more oval and pointed than the upper. The exopodite is developed into a long
peduncular joint, bearing a stout multi-articulate fiagellum, fringed on the posterior side
of the articulations witli long plumose sette.
The third j^air closely resemble the preceding, but are in every way larger. The lower
of the two branchiae is slightly larger than the upper.
The fourth pair of legs are the longest of all. The lower branchia is half as large again
cis the upper.
The fifth pair are similar to the fourth in most respects, but the sette are more tufted
and scattered. On the coxal plate there projects downward and alongside the basos a
small lobe, tufted — especially at the end — with setse.
The sixth pair (PI. XXV. fig. 1) are shorter, slighter, and less setose than the preceding.
The exopodite is, however, relatively strongly developed and is nearly as long as the whole
limb, while in the much larger third pair of legs it does not reach the extremity of the
meros. The setose lobe on the coxal plate is half as long as the basos.
The seventh pair of legs (PI. XXV. fig. 2) show a sudden diminution in the size of the
branchiae, which are not half so large as in the preceding pair. The exopodite also is
reduced to a small branchia-like projection, not reaching the extremity of the ischium
and quite destitute of segmentation. The joints of the leg are more slender and the setae
fewer than in the preceding pair, but the coxal appendage — at least in the females — is
much more strongly developed.
In the eighth ixiir (PL XXV. fig. 3) the diminution is most pronounced; the joints are
slender and nearly destitute of setae, while the branchial plates and exopodite are totally
wanting.
The exact relation of the joints of the legs near their point of attachment to the body is
somewhat difficult to make out. In the first pair — the maxillipeds — there appear to be
eight joints, and if we count back from the dactylos it would seem that the coxal joint
is separated into two articulations, the proximal part bearing the branchiae and the
internal processes, and the distal part the exopodite. The same arrangement is seen in
the second pair of legs. The eighth pair is also segmented into eight very distinct joints,
none of which bear appendages. But in the sixth pair the coxa appears to be reduced to
a plate passing on the inner side into the sternum and carrying the branchiae on its outer
side, while the exopodite is borne on a special lobe or process. In the seventh pair the
coxa appears to be cleft longitudinally, the imier part bearing the ciliated lobe, while
the outer carries the branchiae and the exopodite. The latter is not on a distinctly
sej)arated process, but has a constriction at its base as if indicating a rudimentary joint.
The joints of all the eight pairs of legs from the dactylos to the basos appear to be
easily homologized ; the difficulty of identification seems to lie in the development of
the coxa.
In the females the genital opening (PI. XXV. fig. 3) is a transverse slit on the apex of a
rounded tubercle which is placed just anterior to the last i)air of legs. It stands
between, and a little in front of, the coxal joints, and almost on the sternal divisions.
The setose processes on the inside of the fifth, sixth, and seventh pairs of legs have
probably some relation to this organ.
292 ME. GEOEGE M. THOMSON ON A FEESHWATEE
The five pairs of pleopocla (PI. XXV. fig. 4) on the first to the fifth abdominal segments
are all of a similar form in the females. Each consists of a subquadrate basal joint, the
outer portion of which appears almost as if articulated on to the rest. Near the outer
angle is the large multi-articulate exopodite, which forms an apparently more perfect oar
than the corresponding organ on the thoracic legs. Each is formed of numerous short
joints carrying several long plumose setse. On the inner side of the base is a small
oblong plate like a rudimentary branchia — the endopodite. In going back from the first
to the fifth segment, this endopodite diminishes in size.
In the males the first pair of pleopoda (PI. XXV. fig. 5) have the exopodite normal,
but the endopodite developed into a lamelliform plate which projects inward (figs. 6
and 6 a). This plate appears to be furnished with a duct which opens near its extremity.
The whole organ is somewhat dilated toward the end, and is furnished with a row of
minute spines down the sides of the duct. In the second pair (PL XXV. fig. 7, 8, and 9)
the endopodites are each produced into an elongated peduncle, which is deeply grooved
on its inner face, and bears a double row of stout, slightly-curved spines near its extremity,
and a scoop-like terminal process having smooth edges and with the hollow faces meeting
in the middle line. Both pairs evidently act as copulatory organs ; but I have not been
able to trace the passage of the vasa deferentia into the first pair, which I think represent
the openings of the male generative organs. The second pair appear to act only as
clasping-organs. The succeeding 3rd-5th pairs of pleopoda arc similar to the corre-
sponding limbs in the females.
The uropoda form with the telson a large tail-fin (PL XXV. fig. 9), as in most shrimps.
In each the basal portion is relatively smaU, while the exopodites and endopodites are
produced into large plates or swimmerets ; these are subequal in length, oblong in form,
and bluntly pointed : the distal halves of all four plates are densely fringed with long
comb-like setaj or spines ; the proximal halves of the inner plates are quite smooth
on the outer margin, while those of the outer pltites have a very few short spines.
The telson is short and almost transversely truncate, its length hardly exceeding the
breadth at its base. The blunted end is furnished with a fringe of comb-like teeth.
The shortness of this telson is a characteristic feature, as in the majority of Schizopods it
exceeds the uropoda in length. It is only in certain genera of Mysidse (e. g. Euchceto77iera)
that the latter reach far beyond the end of the telson. The relative width of the uropoda
in .4 ??«spV/^6- causes this tail-fin to act as a very powerful swimming-organ, and this
enables the animal to retreat very rapidly from any danger menacing it in front.
The largest specimen of Anaspides examined by me was 38 mm. or 1^ inch long, but
the length in smaller specimens hardly exceeds 25 mm. I found ova in the oviducts.
Anatomical Structure.
I have met with very considerable difficulty in working out the structure of Anaspides,
owing to the imperfect state of preservation of my specimens. These when caught were
merely put into alcohol of unknown strength, and even this was not changed for two or
three weeks. The result was that all the internal organs were more or less disintegrated.
SCHIZOPOD PKOM TASMANIA. 293
and it was a matter of difficulty — and in some cases of impossibility — to separate them
one from another or from the adjacent tissues.
In not a single specimen could I isolate the heart throughout its length or trace the
course of the principal blood-vessels. The same remark applies to the hepatic tubes,
which were completely disintegrated except at tlieir extremities. This has necessarily
led to an incomplete and imperfect resolution of many details of structure. The best
results in regard to the soft parts were obtained by means of sections.
Alimeittury system. — The oesophagus is very short and passes vertically into the
stomach (PL XXVI. figs. 1 and 6). The latter is an o^ien sac. curving over nearly at
right angles to the gullet and passing directly back into the intestine ; it is of very simple
structure as compared with the usual structure of this organ in the higher Crustacea.
In front, and just where it widens from the oesophagus, the median line is chitinized into
a stout ridge which thickens upAvard into a club-shaped process, covered at its extremity
with tine tooth-like rugosities, and projects into the cavity of the stomach (fig. 7).
Above this process the median ridge bends over to form the dorsal ridge of the stomach,
and this thickening is continued back as far as the fourth thoracic segment. On each
side of the base of this line the chitinous thickening is expanded into a t\vo-lol)ed pro-
cess, ending in sharp and somewhat widely separated points. At the posterior side of the
mouth-opening there arise two stout chitinous ridges densely covered, especially at their
base, with setiu or curved bristles, all pointing inwai'd. Thus the opening of the stomach
is guarded by so many projecting processes that it must be almost impossible for food to
be again ejected at tlie gullet. On each side of the frontal median ridge the stomach
is produced into two curved concavities occupying the front portion of the cephalic
segment almost to the bases of the antennae aad the ocular peduncles. The base
of the stomach, reaching back from the oesophagus to n ear the fourth segment of fue
body, is chitinized, and the bands on each side of it are thickly ciliated (tig. y). Tvvo
other ciliated bauds pass up the sides and converge towards the median band, forming
along with it the roof of the cavity. The side-wails of the stomach between the chitinous
bands are very thin and membranous, and are protected by tlie dense mass of muscles
of the mandibles. The whole of the stomach and part of the fore-gut appear to be
covered by a longitudinal sheath of muscular tissue. Except the clu]>-shaped projection
in the front of the stomach, there seems to be no special masticatory apparatus, and
trituration of the food appears to depend on the up-and-down movement of the whole
upper part of the sac. Maceration of the food is certainly very imperfectly effected, as I
have investigated the contents of the intestine and found that so far back as the seventh
thoracic segment fragments of Copepoda, &c., occurred, in which the integuments and
portions of the limbs were still intact. I think it probable that the hepatic tubes open
into the alimentary canal just at the posterior end of the stomach or at the very com-
mencement of the intestine ; but neither by dissection nor by longitudinal and transverse
sections could I detect the opening, although the tubes themselves were in several cases
followed up to this part of the canal.
Erom the stomach the intestine proceeds back as a straight, simple, and rather wide
tube ; for about the posterior half of its length the wall is wrinkled into small folds, as
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 39
294 MK. GEOEGE M. THOjMSON ON A FEESHWATEK
if capable of very considerable backward and forward movement. At about t\^ o-tbirds of
its lengtb, or just about tbe first abdominal seg-ment, it bears on its upper surface a sbort
oval csecum — in large specimens about 2 mm. long, — directed forward (PI. III. fig. 2).
Tliis organ is evidently an excretory gland. Its cavity is densely lined with tube-sliaped
cells placed vertically to tbe walls, leaving a hollow space in tbe interior, which is
partly tilled with loosely-interwoven elongated and pointed cells, and communicates by
means of a sbort duct Avith the intestine. At about tbe extremity of the antepenulti-
mate segment of the abdomen the intestine bears on its upper surface another csecum,
shorter than the first and directed backward (fig. 3). This is also lined with glandular
tissue arranged in the same manner as in the anterior one, and has a central duct. Tlie
function of both these organs is probably urinary. In tbe last abdominal segment the
intestine contracts sharply to less tban half its previous diameter, and, entering the telson,
bends abruptly upward and backward, and then passes out nearly straight to the anus,
which is in the form of a longitudinal slit. Where it contracts the wall is surrounded by
a coat of muscles arranged in an annular manner.
The liver is quite difi"erent in its structure from the corresjionding organ in any other
Crustacean with wdiich I am acquainted. Ow ing to tbe very soft tissue of which it is com-
posed, especially in its anterior portion, and its consequ.ent state of disintegration in all
my specimens, I have been able to make out only a portion of its structure. It consists of
a number of slender cylindrical tubes, lying horizontally, but slightly interwoven in the
body-cavity, above and on both sides of tbe alimentary canal, and reaching back to half-
way betw een the intestinal caeca. In one specimen I traced as many as eighteen of these
tubes forward to about tbe posterior end of the stomach, but failed in every instance to
find any duct or opening into the alimentary canal. These tubes are of a yellowish
straw-colour in ordinary spirit-specimens. Their posterior portions, when considerably
magnified, exhibit at the extremity a mass of slightly elongated pointed cells, thickly
charged with granular contents (PL XXVI. fig. 9). At a short distance from tbe end a
duct arises, the cells all round it, winch line the w'alls of the tube, being arranged in a
more or less vertical direction.
Excretory organs. — My identification of the so-called " green gland " or renal organ
characteristic of all tbe higher Crustacea is not satisfactory, if indeed it exists at all. I
have not identified it in dissected specimens, but in one or two sections I have observed
■what appears to be a small mass of glandular tissue lying in front of and partly below
the anterior lobes of the stomach and close up to the bases of the lower antennae. At
the same time I have not found any duct by -which its excretions are liberated. It is
just possible that I have mistaken for this the somewhat disintegrated tissue of the pre-
oral ganglion ; but if so, its connexion with the large nerves supplying the eyes has not been
traced. It is perfectly possible that the organ is wanting or only exists in a rudimentary
state, especially if the intestinal caeca usurp its functions, as I have surmised.
Circulatory apparatus. — My observations on this part of the anatomy are A'ery frag-
mentary, but they are suflicient to attest the primitive character of Ana.spides.
The heart consists of a long simple tube, apparently little dilated in each body-
SCHIZOPOD TROM TASMANIA. 295
segment, lying close to the dorsal surface and tapering gradually at both ends into a
more slender cylindrical vessel. I have traced the whole tube from about the third
thoracic segment back jxxst the posterior intestinal cfecum. Of the arteries passing from
the heart, exclusive of its anterior and posterior prolongations, which may be considered
respectively as the cej)halic and upper abdominal arteries, I have succeeded in tracing
only one prominent artery passiiig almost vertically downward between the seventh
and eighth thoracic segments, which probably su^jplies the greater portion of the sternal
region. But I have failed to find any trace of the valvular openings into the pericar-
dial sinus, by which the blood returning from the branchite and other portions of the
body is again fed back to the heart. This is of course due to the very imperfect
condition of the tissues examined.
The branchiie, as already mentioned, are all lamelliform and are carried externally.
Morphologically there are seven pairs on each side, but those of the first pair of legs
(maxillipeds) are very much reduced in size, and probably more or less in function also.
The branchia-like cndopodites of the abdomiual appendages are no doubt f unctionless as
breathing-organs.
Reproductive organs. — I have not succeeded in definitely making out tiu; structure of
the testes and vasa deferentia in the very few male specimens at my disposal. The male
organ, so far as it was identified, consists of two thin, whitish tubes, lying nearly parallel
one to another, above and slightly on each side of the intestine (PL XXVI. fig. 5). These
extend from the third segment of the thorax, where they are smaller and very mu.ch
twisted, as far Ijack as the telson. The densely-twisted part of the organ lies in the
penultimate segment of the thorax. The vasa deferentia pass outward from the body-
cavity by two rather wide tul:)es, which come down near the outer side of the body to
the first pair of abdominal legs.
Tlie ovaries form a somewhat flattened pinkish mass on each side of the body above
the alimentary canal, having rounded lobes projecting upward and downward so as
almost to meet in the median line. The supra-abdominal artery lies along the margins
of these lobes, which extend from the last segment of the thorax to the region of the
posterior intestinal caecum. In more sexually mature specimens in w liich the ova were
found lying in the oviducts, the latter were seen to lie lower down in the body-cavit}^ at
the sides or even below the intestine. In the most advanced specimen examined the
ova were nearly one millimetre long and were oblong in form. Even in such relatively
well-developed ova there was no commencement of differentiation into definite structures.
The whole interior appeared to be composed of more or less spherical cells, which were
especially densely packed and were smaller in size towards the centre. Even at this
stage, the ovum had a strong, homogeneous, well-defined wall, and appeared as if nearly
ready to be extruded. In one specimen I found ova ranging from an early morula (?)
stage up to the form described, but all the tissues were in bad preservation. I have not
succeeded in tracing the ovaries down to the genital opening, which is on the sternum,
between the last two pairs of thoracic legs.
39^
296 MR. GEORGE M. THOMSON ON A FRESHWATER
NercoMS System and Sense-Organs.
The nerve cord (PI. XXVI. fig. 4) was easily traced along the whole ventral surface
of the hody from the extremity of the ahdomen to the mouth, but the organization of its
anterior end was not made out satisfactorily either by dissection or by means of
sections.
In the abdomen there are six quite distinct paired ganglia, the cords being almost
united at the very base of the telson to form the largest of these. From each pair
of ganglia at its anterior and outer side there proceeds a dense jjlexus of nerves to
the surrounding masses of muscular tissue, while from its posterior outer side there
passes one rather stout nerve obliquely backwards and downwards to enter the
appendage. Each pair of ganglia is separated by two very distinct and somewhat
widely separated commissures.
In the thorax the ganglia lie much closer together, the commissures, though quite
distinct, being parallel and touching throughout their length. The ganglionic portion
of the cord is not sharply defined as in the abdomen, the position of the different
centres bemg made out most readily by the nerves which pass into the appendages.
There appear to be seven (or eight) fairly well-defined ganglia in the thorax, but imme-
diately behind the gullet is a mass of ganglionic tissue which appears to supply all the
mouth-orsans, but which I was not able to resolve into its constituent elements; nor
could I trace the passage of the commissures round the mouth to the anterior ganglionic
mass from which proceed the powerful nerves which supply the eyes and the antennoe.
The etjes are well-developed as in the higher forms of Crustacea. I have not
examined their minute structure.
The organ ofhearing (PI. XXVI. fig. 10) is situated in the basal joint of the first pair
of antenna?. It consists of an oblong cavity, occupying about two-thirds of the length
of the joint, and communicating with the outside by a duct which opens at the end of
the joint under a tuft of terminal sette. The roof of the cavity is formed by the flattened
upper surface of the joint. This roof is lined by a colourless tissue formed of two (or
three ■?) layers of somewhat elongated hyaline cells, standing obliquely or nearly vertically
to the surface. The internal layer which forms the lining of the upper part of the
cavity appears to form a series of trumpet- or cup-shaped sockets, into which the auditory
hairs are jointed. Each of these hairs consists of a club-shaped stalk or pedicel, bearing
an elongated bell-shaped cell or capsule (fig. 11). I cannot make out Avithout fresh
material whether these cells are open or not ; I am inclined to think that they are closed
sacs. I have not been able to trace the se2iarate nerve-fibres passing into these auditory
tubes, except near their base, but a very considerable nerve enters the antenna, and has
been followed by me nearly up to the auditory cavity.
I could not detect any trace of sand-particles such as are common in most of the
higher Crustacea, in which the auditory sac communicates with the outside water by
a canal, nor of an otolith such as occurs in those forms Avhich have a closed sac. Each
auditory tube or hair appears to possess a somewhat complicated structure in its capsular
portion. These sense-organs are quite unlike any others hitherto recorded among the
SCHIZOPOD 1«'E0M TASMANIA. 297
Artlii'opoda, and will evidently repay close investigation. I tliink each cavity contains
a single row of these auditory hairs.
I have already referred to the tactile and olfactory hairs of the antennas.
Fragmentary and imperfect as this sketch of the anatomy is, it is sufficient to show
that in several respects the structure of Anaspldes is unique among Crustacea. The
abdominal caeca, the numerous isolated hepatic tubes, the simple tube-like heart, and the
curious structure of the auditory hairs are features peculiar to this Crustacean, differen-
tiating it not only from other members of the family Sehizopoda (from which Amspides
is also separated by its want of a carapace and external lamellate gills), but, I think,
from all other described Malacostraca.
Affinities and Systematic Position.
Anaspides is manifestly a schizopod shrimp, but its greatly generalized characters
as well as its remarkalile habitat point it out as a survival of a very old type. The most
conspicuous external features are the want of a carapace and the plate-like character of
the branchiae. Both are no doubt associated with its habitat among the clefts of rocky
pools, where its enemies were probably few and far between, and in which its body was
greatly protected, but the former feature especially seems to me indicative of the great
antiquity of the type. Until the full development has been worked out — and we know
absolutely nothing about it yet — it is impossible to arrive at any conclusions as to how
far the carapace is developed in the embryonic stages ; but, with this solitary exception,
1 know of no Crustacean belonging to the Thoracostraca in which there is absolutely
no trace of a carapace in the adult forms.
In general appearance Anaspiides apjjroaches nearest among Sehizopoda to the family
Euphausiidse, with which it agrees in the following external features : — (1) the 7-jointed
pediform maxillipeds ; (2) the general uniform structure of the walking-legs ; and (3)
the well-developed natatory abdominal limbs, the first two pairs of which are modified
in the males as copulative organs. The points of dissimilarity are numerous enough, but
they are features in which it differs from all Schizopods, and not from the Euphausiidie
alone. Sars has shown* that in the Euphausiidge there are six principal stages of
development. After the young animal has passed through the Nauplius and Meta-
naiiplius stages, it enters on the Culijptopis stage, so-called by him after one of Dana's
spurious genera. In this stage, in which only the cephalic appendages are jiresent,
the carapace is attached to the anterior part of the body of the larva, and though it
pvojects backward to cover the portion which afterwards develops into the thoracic
segments, it is not anywhere joined to these segments, but only to the cepbalon. Even
at this early stage, however, it covers and comes to be attached to the somite which
bears the maxillipeds. Thus early in the development of a typical Schizopod has the
carapace come to be a prominent feature. It may here be pointed out that the
resemblance of the body of A// asp ides to that of a sessile-eyed Crustacean is not confined
to the want of a carapace and the occurrence of lamellate branchiae ; it is also suggested
* Report on the Sehizopoda of the 'Challenger' Expedition, p. 150.
298 ME. GEOiiGE M. THOMSON OX A EEESHWATEK
by the presence of a well-marked lateral suture on the tirst thoracic segment, recalling
the epimeron of most Isopoda, which, however, is in some instances not developed on
the first, though prominent on the succeeding segments.
The plate-like character of the branchiae is a feature which does not exhibit nearly so
radical a digression as the loss of the carapace. In the development of Ewphaiisia
pellucida, Sars has shown * that after the Cahjptopis stage the larva passes through a
Furcilia stage, in which the anterior legs and the pleopoda begin to develop. The legs
first ajipear as simple processes or lobes, giving rise on their outer side to a minute knob,
which is the rudimentary exopodite. As the endopodite develops and gradually becomes
articulated, a simple; knob-like protuberance arises at its base, below the exopodite,
which as development proceeds bifurcates into two rudimentary plates. This stage
appears to cori'cspond with tliat reached by Anaspkles, only in the Furcilia larva the
branchiae continue to subdivide imtil they ultimately become arborescent in the adult,
because they are sheltered under a carapace and so must expose the largest surface
possible to the somewhat limited sujjply of water with which they are surrounded. In
most of the Schizojioda the gills become arborescent.
The archaic character of Anaspides is more fully revealed by a study of its anatomy.
The alimentary canal sho\\s a much simpler structure than prevails in any other
described Schizopod. In Ilysis t, which may l)e looked on as one of the least highly
developed forms of the suborder, the stomach is distinctly divided into an anterior
(cardiac) and a posterior (pyloric) })ortion ; the latter is much the smaller, is of very
complicated structure, and is the j^art in which the food is chietiy triturated. Opening-
just behind it and placed dorsally is a small caecum, which acts probably as a sort of
salivary gland. The liver is composed of ten jjouch-likc masses, five on each side, which
unite their contents into a hepatic duct entering the intestiiie just where it leaves the
stomach. The intestine is a nearly straiglit tube, passing directly to the anus, and having
no caeca or diverticula communicating with it anywhere behind the opening of the
hepatic duct. In Ettphausia % the structure of the alimentary canal is essentially similar,
but above the pyloric portion of the stomach are two small incurving caeca (not one as
in Ml/sis), while the liver consists of a mass of minute hepatic tubes on each side of the
intestine and not reaching to the posterior portion of the thorax. These masses of tubes
are quite distinct in appearance and aggregation from the long isolated tubes of
Anaspides. Ca^ca of the mid-gut are found in all orders of Crustacea as paired or
unpaired organs. Their position appears to vary a good deal. Eor example, in some
Bracliyura (e. g. Carcimis) a pyloric ca3cuni or diverticulum arises on each side of the
stomach in front of the hepatic ducts, which when uncoiled exceeds the intestine in
length, Avhile at about one-third of the distance from the stomach to the anus a solitary
caecal appendage arises, also in the form of a long tube. In others (e. g. Maia) the
latter caecum is placed at the extreme anterior extremity of the intestine. In the
Macroura there is always the usual pyloric caecum, but in some genera (e. g. Astacus)
* L.c. p. 10:?, pi. XXX. figs. 23-27.
t G. 0. Sars, ' Hist. Nat. des Urustaces d"eau douce de Norvi'go/ p. 2G.
X ' Challenger ' Report, p. T-j.
SCHIZOPOD FEOM TASMANIA. 299
there is uo appendage of the intestine, though this is present in others. In all the
Tlioracostraca the liver is in the form of a moi'e or less compact mass composed of
numerous small caeca. In Amphipoda (e. g. Gammarus '*) a single pyloric caecum opens
just beliind the stomach, and this is also jirobably salivary in its function; while at the
posterior end of the mid-gut two slender cylindrical processes open into the intestine.
These caeca are placed along the dorsal surface of the intestine, antl reach as far forward
as the last thoracic segment. Their function is probably nrinary. In CaprcUa deutafaf
a single pyloric ctccum is placed dorsally to the posterior part of the stomach and opens
in the front part of tlie intestine, while near its posterior extremity the intestine carries
a small simple caecum very similar to the posterior one in Anaspk/e.s.
In the Schizopod under consideration tlie stomach is hardly separable into a cardiac
and pyloric portion, nor is the separation between the hind part of the stomach and the
intestine at all well marked. The liver is unique in its structure. There is no trace of
a pyloric caecum J, the first organ of the kind being placed as far back as the first
abdominal segment. Prom the imperfectly triturated condition of the food in the part
of the intestine which passes through the thorax, I am inclined to believe, as said
before, that the gastric function is only imperfectly performed by the stomach, and that
the anterior part of the intestine acts as part of the pyloric stomach. If this be so, the
anterior cfecum may still function 2iartly as a salivary organ (though this is hardly
probable), and the posterior one, Avhich is placed far back in the alimentary canal, may
be excretory only and may act as a urinary gland. It is clear, however, that the whole
structure of the alimentary canal bears a closer resemblance to the lower Amphipoda
(Caprellidaj) than to any of the higher forms of Crustacea, and this is probably to be
looked on as another survival of a primitive type of structure.
The circulatory apparatus has been shown to be very elementary in its structure. In
the Brachyura the heart reaches its maximum development, occurring in most crabs as
a short polygonal vessel placed in such a central position as to readily control by its
rhythmic action the blood-supply of the body. In Macroui-a it is also a well-developed
saccular organ, from which the passage of the various arteries can readily be traced. In
Schizopods, though not so well developed, it still preserves its saccular character. But in
Anaspides it is apparently reduced to a simple tube. Only in the Stomatopoda, among
the higher Crustacea, is there any approach to such a primitive form.
It is premature, with the imperfect knowledge of this animal still at our disjjosal and
our absolute ignorance of its development, to attempt to frame any genealogical scheme
showing its position among the Schizopoda, but from the points referred to I thmk it
probable that the Ajiaspidae and the Euphausiidte were somewhat closely allied in their
origin.
*^Sars, Crustacc's rl'eau douce, p. 5-5.
t 1*. Mayer, ' Die Caprelliden des Golt'es von jS'capcl,' p. 147, Taf. 9. figs. 2, '■'>, and 4.
% This statement must be accepted with the reservation due to tlie fact that 1 could not make out this feature
clearl}', but it appeared to me as if the upper part of the pyloric portion of the stomach was enveloped in an easily
disintegrated tissue of which I could not trace the close connection with the alimentary eanal which certainly
existed. "Whether this tissue represents an imperfectly developed pyloric caecum, or an anterior process of the liver,
I have not succeeded in demonstrating.
300 ME. GEOEGE M. THOMSON ON A FEESHWATEE
In trying to arrive at some conclusions as to the lengtli of time during wliicli
Anaspides has heen isolated, the following facts are of interest. I am indebted for this
information on the geology of the district to my friend and former pupil, Mr. A. Mont
gomery, M.A., Government Geologist of Tasmania. The top of Mt. Wellington, as well
as the central plateau of Tasmania, consists of a mass of greenstone (diabase) of about
Permo-Carboniferous age. According to Mr. R. M. Johnston, the greenstone existed
prior to the deposition of the shell-beds and sandstones which flank its base, while Messrs.
Stephens and Montgomery consider it to be younger. Mr. Johnston admits, how^ever,
that there was a " newer greenstone " eruption which broke through these marine
deposits, so that it is agreed that the Permo-Carboniferous beds were penetrated by
greenstones subsequent to their formation, and it is probable that the eruption of these
greenstones and the elevation of the marine beds were contemporaneous. The green-
stones break through and cover the Upper Coal-measures, W'hich have been referred to
the Mesozoic period on account of the plant-fossils contained in them, though no strati-
graphical break has yet been discovered between them and the Permo-Carboniferous
marine beds at a horizon very little below them. If Mesozoic at all, they must probably
be referred to the beginning of that period, and the greenstone eruptions were probably
little later. They were certainly older than the oldest Tertiary beds, which may be
Eocene. There are no Secondary marine beds, and the Tertiaries are quite littoral, so it
appears certain that Tasmania has never been under water to any great extent since some
time in the Mesozoic, and possibly since the close of the Palaeozoic period. It seems
probable that the basaltic eruption, of which the diabase greenstones are the remains,
took place early in the Mesozoic period, and that it was of immense extent, the whole of
the eastern half of the island being covered with lavas. Sub-aerial erosion has since
carved out these, leaving the central plateau and the top of Ben Lomond as remains
of the great covering sheet, and exposing the dykes and bosses through which tlie
molten matter was ejected, in the numerous small greenstone hills in the loAver country.
Mt. Wellington was probably one of the large centres of eruption, as a deep bore at the
Cascades near Hobart shows the greenstone to underlie the Permo-Carboniferous beds.
The fact that Tasmania has been dry land since Mesozoic times Avill probably not be
disputed by any one conversant wdth the geology of the country.
It seems to me probable that Auasjndes has been isolated from some marine form
since a period shortly after the eruption of the greenstones referred to. The occurrence
of freshwater Crustacea belonging to marine types may be variously accounted for. It is
alw ays possible that the animals themselves or their eggs may have been carried by aquatic
birds ; but I know of no recorded case of such a mode of distribution, nor do I know of
any marine form which would survive in fresh water. I have often plunged various
littoral species belonging to different families (Palinurus, Atylus, Dexamme, Sphceroma,
&c.) into fresh water and found that they died in a very short period of time, usually in
the course of a few minutes. On the other hand, the adaptability of various marine
Crustacea to a freshwater habitat by gradual stages is a well-ascertained fact. The
following examples are of interest. In New Zealand I originally described Idotea laeiis-
tris from brackish water at the mouth of a lagoon which communicates with the sea at
SCHIZOPOD FROM TASMANIA. 301
spring tides or after heavy rains, and afterwards found the same species further up the
lagoon where the water was quite fresh. My co-worker and friend, Dr. Chilton, has since
found the species in a mountain stream in the same neighbourhood at an elevation of
1200 feet. It is clear that in this instance this Isopod has within very recent times
made its way up the stream, where it is now thoroughly estabhshed. The same
species has been taken in the Straits of Magellan, and all the other numerous species of
the genus and family are marine with the exception of the Scandinavian Gbjptonotus
entomon.
Leander fluviatilis, St/menosoma lacustris, and CalUophis fluviatilis occur in New
Zealand streams and lakes, and, though not found in the sea, are not uncommon in tidal
waters. Crangonyx compactus, Calliojmis siibteivaneus, ami Gammarusfrayills, found by
Dr. Chilton in the subterranean waters of Canterbury, and Pherusa cccrulea, found by
myself in a stream in the Old Man Range in Otago at an elevation of 3000 feet, are
species belonging to marine genera, which have most probably migrated from the sea by
gradual stages. I have myself taken Coroph'mm excavatum, Allorchestes recens, and a
species of Schizopod which I identify as Iltisldopsis incisa, Sars (origuially described
from a specimen obtained at the entrance of Port Phillip from a depth of 33 fathoms),
from the mouths of streams or lagoons where the water is frequently quite fresh. These
are a few examples, taken from instances occurring in New Zealand, of a gradual transi-
tion of marine into freshwater species, and of which similar examples could no doubt
be recorded from all other jmrts of the world.
In such a manner most probably the ancestral forms of Anasjildes found their way
from the sea in Mesozoic times into the streams and lakes then occurring in Tasmania,
in which, to judge from its remarkable specialization, it has been isolated for a great
period of time. Its association with Phreatoicus australis and Niphargns montanus points
in the same direction. The former, as already stated, is an Isopod of a very old and
greatly generalized type. Its occurrence in two such isolated localities as Mt. Kosciusko
in New South Wales, a granitic mass of great antiquity, and Mt. Wellington in Tasmania,
and at a very considerable elevation m both, would appear to show that it has survived
thi'ough long periods of time ; coupled Avith which is the fact of the only allied species
being an eyeless form from the underground Avaters of Canterbury in the South Island of
New Zealand.
The very vegetation on the summit of Mt. Wellington suggests the antiquity of the
region. Surrounding the locality in which Anaspides was found grow numerous forms
of plant-life characteristic of the Antarctic Plora of Tasmania, the Australian Alps, and
Isew Zealand, such as Abrotanellu, Doimtm, Carpha, Oreobolns, Uncinia, &c., so that
could one shut one's eyes to the Australian element which is so abundantly present, it
would not be difficult to imagine one's self on a mountain in the south portion of New
Zealand or on one of the peaty swamps of Stewart Island.
These facts certainly give no direct testimony to the age of Anaspides, but they are
suggestive, and may enable us, when its development has been worked out and its own
distribution and that of its associated forms are better known, to arrive at some more
defluite conclusions on the subject.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. YI. iO
302 ME. GEORGE M. THOMSON ON A FRESHWATER
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Plate XXIV.
Figs. 1-16. AnaspUles tasmanice.
1. Body of animal, ? . x 4.
2. Dorsal view of ceplialoii : (e) 1st antennae; (6) 2nd antennae, x 30.
3. Basal portion of 1st antenna. x 26.
4. Portion of tLe external tlagellum of same, showing setse and sensory haiis. x 56.
5. Basal portion of 2nd antenna, x 26.
6. First maxilla, x 26.
7. Second maxilla, x 26.
8. One of the comb-like setse from the outer lobe of the second maxilla. X 56.
9. Under-lip. X 26.
10. Mandible, with palp, x 26.
11. Cutting-edge of same, showing the double row of teeth. x 84.
12. Grinding tubercle of same. x 84.
13. Leg of the 1st pair (maxilliped). X 13.
14. Section of basis of same, x 26.
15. Extremity of propodos, and dactylos of same, underside, x 56.
16. Leg of the 2nd pair. X 13.
Plate XXV.
Figs. 1-10. Anaspides tasmania.
1. Leg of the 6th pair. x 13.
2. Leg of the 7th pair, female, x 13.
3. Leg of the 8th pair, female : ^.o. = tubercle with genital opening. x 13.
4. Second pleopod, female, x 13.
5. First pleopod, male, x 13.
6. Eadopodite of same, x 26.
6 a. Endopodite of same, seen from the inside, young male, x 56.
7. Second pair of pleopoda in male, without the exopodites. x 13.
8. Endopodite of 2nd pleopod in male. x 26.
8«. Extremity of same turned inward. x 26.
9. Telson and uropods from above. x 13.
10. Oral aperture seen from the underside. X 10.
i.a., 1st antennae; o.a., 2nd antennae; m./., under lip ormetastoma; ware., mandibles ; mp., maxillipeds.
Plate XXVI.
Figs. 1-12. Anaspides iasmania. — Anatomy.
1. Longitudinal (diagrammatic) section through the body of a female specimen (the heart is
represented as too near the dorsal surface, the large dorsal muscles not being shown) : o.a.,
mouth-orifice; in., intestine; h.t., liver; n.c, nerve-cord; c, heart; ov., ovaries; co., anterior
intestinal ctecum ; co.j, posterior intestinal caecum ; an., anus.
SCHIZOPOD FEOM TASMANIA. 303
Pig. 2. Longitudinal section through portion of intestine and anterior caecum.
3. Corresponding section through intestine and posterior caecum.
4. Nerve-cord.
5. Testes and vasa deferentia.
6. Outline representing longitudinal section of stomach : «., gullet ; in., intesthie.
7. Club-shaped process in front of stomach.
8. Chitinous hairs from the lining of the stomach. Highly magniiied.
9. Posterior extremity of a hepatic tube. Highly magnified.
10. Section through base of first antenna showing the auditory cavity.
11. Auditory capsules or setae. Highly magnified.
] 2. Basal joints of inner flagellum of first antennae, showing the remarkable tactile hairs, &c.
/
^i^||i^..,
Tp^jfK.LjHjff.Soc . Zool,.Ser.2 .Yc-
«;.
^^
, i
,*
-. '.>^'
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMOKANDA CONCEllNING TEANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and 6s. to Fellows ; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
wrapper) ; —
Wlien Price to the
Volume. Publisht-a. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Series. — Zoology.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 .
Part 11. 1875 0 6 0 ,
Part HI. 1876 1 8 0 ,
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 ,
Part V. 1877 0 18 0
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 ,
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 .
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 ,
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 ,
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 .
Part Y. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885. .... 0 6 0 .
Part XV. 18S5 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
PartXVIlI. 1888 0 2 6 .
Price to
Fellows.
When Price to the
\ oluiiie. - T» 1 1- 1 1 71 ui-
Published. Public.
£ S. d.
Second Series. — Zoology (continued).
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0 . . . .
Part II. 1884 1 12 0 . . . .
Part III. 1885 1 10 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . . . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0 . . . .
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 . . . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 . . . .
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0 . . . .
Part II. 1SS8 0 5 0
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1890. .... 0 12 0 . . . .
Part V. 1890 0 6 0
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0 .. ..
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 ....
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 . . . .
Part IX. 1892 0 12 0
Part X. 1893 1 8 0
Part XI. 1894 0 2 6 . . . .
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 . . . .
Part II. 1894 1 11 0 ....
Part HI. 1894 0 10 0
Price to
Fellows.
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
SEP 9 1396
[VOL. VI. PART 4.
THE
TRANSACTIONS
OP
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
THE COMPARATIVE MOEFHOLOGY OF THE GALEODIDJI.
BY
H. M. BERNARD, M.A. Cantab., F.L.S., P.Z.S.
(from TUE HT.TXLEY RESEARCH LABORATORY, ROYAL COLLEGE OP SCIENCE.)
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
iV/
''Februorn 1896.
SEP 9 1898
[ 305 ]
IV. The Comparative Ilorphologij of the Galeodidae. By H. M. Bernard, 3LA. Cantab.^
F.L.S., F.Z.S. {From the Huxley Research Laboratory, Royal College of Science.)
(Plates XXVII.-XXXIV.)
Bead 7th February, 1895.
Contents, _
Page
Introduction 305
Historical , 307
I. The External Form and Segmentation 308
II. The Internal Apodematous Skeletal System 319
III. The Limbs 321
IV. The Cuticle and its Derivatives, and the Hypodermis 330
V. The Muscular System 335
VI. The Nervous System 341
VII. The Sense Organs 345
VIII. The Alimentary Canal 355
IX. The Heart and Circulation 365
X. The Kespiratory System 371
XI. Excretory Organs 377
XII. Reproductive Organs 384
XIII. Summary, an attempt to elucidate the Phylogeny of the Arachnida 387
XIV. Bibliography 404
XV. Explanation of the Plat«s 407
Introduction.
A COMPARATIVE study of the Arachnidan family, the Galeodidge *, has long been a
desideratum. The chief sources of our knowledge of this family date back to times
before the all-absorbing questions of ancestry had made morphology the fascinating
study it now is. The Artbrojiods, for many reasons, have long been recognized as
presenting a rich field for investigation in this direction, and most modern works deaUng
with the mor^ihology of any Arthropod form contain discussions as to the probable
affinity of the family described with other members of the group, and its bearing on
the ancestry of the Arthropods in general. Of such discussions, none have been carried
on so vigorously as that on the affinities of the Arachnida.
This controversy, for such it is, arose out of an attempt to connect the Arachnids
with the ancient aquatic Merostomata, one form of which, Limulns, is still extant. This
suggested relationship, though widely accepted, has been also strenuously opposed. Some
opponents confine themselves to a purely negative attitude, others prefer to see distant
affinities with the lusecta. The Galeodidae are largely responsible for this suggested
* This name was given by Ohvier, 1791, and, according to Dufour, referred to the resemblance of the cephalic
lobes to a helmet {galea). Others, however, would deduce it from the Greek yaXeri, a weasel-like animal, in refer-
ence, no doubt, to the light colour and rapid movements of the commoner species. The name Soljiuga was given later
by Herbst, 1797.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 41
306 ME. H, M. BEENAED ON THE
Hexapodan affinity, chiefly because tliey appear to have a head separated from a thorax
of three segments ; this, taken together with the presence of Malpighian vessels,
unknown in the Crustacea but characteristic of the Hexapods, was brought forward as
evidence. The Galeodidce, therefore, might be expected to be valuable witnesses one
way or the other.
The present attempt to gather the evidence to be gained from the Galeodidse began in
the following way: — In 1892* I endeavoured to show that the morphology of the
Crustacean A^nis (and of the Merostomata) could be explained by deducing them from a
Chsetopod Annelid, which, in adaptation to a new manner of feeding, bent the first
segment, with mouth and prostomium, ventrally, so as to push the food iuto the mouth
by means of the parapodia. The necessary conclusion, that Liniulns was a primitive
Crustacean, brought me involuntarily into the question of the origin of the Arachnida,
inasmuch as the supporters of the Arachnidan affinities of Limulus separated the
Merostomata from the Crustacea. I therefore set myself the following problem : — Is
it possible, by comparing the known Arachnids one with another, to find out, as I claim
to have done in the case of the Crustacea, what modifications of the primitive Annelidan
segmentation, in adaptation, probably, to some special manner of feeding, gave I'ise to
the Arachnidan phylum ? Por I assumed, at the outset, that modifications for better
acquiring the materials for growth were the most far-reaching and fundamental in
initiating new departures in animal morphology. The Arachnids might still be
derivatives of the Merostomata, in spite of the fact that the latter were, as I believe,
primitive Crustacea. The only way to settle the question was to ascertain, if possible,
how the arrangement of their anterior segments had been derived from a jirimitive
■undifferentiated condition. Here, again, Galeodes promised to yield valuable evidence,
on account of its claim to have a head and three thoracic segments.
The results here recorded were not obtained at once. I had already drafted the
description of the anatomy of the Galeodidse iu extenso, and had worked over the draft
at least twice without discovering any satisfactory explanation of the morphology of the
anterior segments of the Arachnida. The difficulties seemed insuperable, in spite of
the apparent simplicity of the results. One clue, however, led to another, each one in
turn necessitating considerable recasting of the MS. It is, indeed, with reluctance,
under the pressure of other engagements, that I now let it go forth ; for, though I believe
that I have solved the problem I set myself, the paper covers so much ground and
deals with so many points that I am painfully conscious not only of blanks which I
wished to have filled, but of very uncertain handling of many subjects, where I have
neither done justice to my own accumulated material nor to the existing literature.
I need hardly apologize for errors which, in a work of this extent, are almost
unavoidable, except where I have unconsciously overlooked or misunderstood the views
and statements of others.
I have at the outset to fulfil a pleasant duty in thanking the authorities at the Royal
College of Science for having placed a table in the Huxley Research Laboratory at my
* "Tho Apodidae." ' Nature' Series : London, 1892.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. SOT
disposal for three consecutive sessions, during one of wliich I was granted tlie
Marshall Scholarship. Por material I am indehted to Professor Howes, who kindly
obtained for me specimens of two genera, Galeodes and Rliax [I further take this
opportunity of acknowledging my great indebtedness to Professor Howes for much
invaluable and sympathetic advice] ; to Pi'ofessor Mobius, director of the Berlin
Museum, who kindly sent me four large specimens labelled " Galeodes cjrrecus (Koch),"
but which, according to Mr. Pocock, are G. arabs (Koch) ; to Professor Tichomirotf, of
Moscow, who generously sent me some fine specimens of Galeodes and Rhux ; and, lastly,
to Miss Hay, formerly of Tashkeud, for two specimens of Galeodes and one of Rhax.
Some of these specimens were cut into sections, a difficult process, owing to the
enormous thickness of the cuticle in various parts of the ce2)halothorax, and others were
dissected.
I have further examined the collection of Galeodidae, containing five genera {Galeodes^
Solpuga, Rhax, Clcobis, and Glncia), in the Eritisli Museum, and owe my best thanks
to my friend Mr. E.. I. Pocock, who has charge of them, not only for his courtesy in
placing them at my disposal, but also for much friendly advice and criticism *. I have
followed Mr. Pocock's classification throughout.
Owing to the necessarily limited supply of these rare animals, there are many points
left entirely untouched. And, further, owing to the indifferent state of j)reservation in
which the specimens come from the collectors, many important histological questions
can only be provisionally answered. Nevertheless, the positive results obtained are of
sufficient interest and importance to justify tliis publication in the hoj)e that, at some
future time, if my efforts to obtain material are successful, it will be followed by a
supplement supplying at least some of the deficiencies.
HiSTOPaCAL.
In 1797 Lichtenstein and Herbst published an intei'esting historical account of the
Galeodidae +. All the references to the group to be found in the works of previous
writers, ancient and modern, are quoted, and the manner of life of some of the commoner
forms is described.
The first compreliensive account of the anatomy of the Galeodidae, by Modest Kittary,
appeared in 18^8 (41). It deals with two species called by the author G. aranoides
and G. intrepklus. The description is on the whole very accurate, and many of the
results obtained seem not to have received the attention they deserve. Blanchard's
* 1 have also serial sections of Pseudoscorpions, Phalangidaj, Araneae, Scorpions, Thelj-phonidte, and Phrynidaj,
for most of which I am indebted to my wife. My thanks are also due to my friend Mr. Martin Woodward for some
beautiful sections of Scorpio and Spiders. I further dissected I'hri/nus, large .Spiders, and Scorpions for tlio
purpose of comparison.
t " Natnrgeschichte der Insekten-Gattungen Solpuga und Phalangiam " : Uerlin, 1797. The authors adduce
reasons for believing that the " mice " which plagued the Philistines [I. Samuel, 5 and 6J were " Wind-scorpions,"
as the Arabs call Galeodes. They record the evil reputation of this animal, which is said to have forced the inhabitants
of flourishing regions to desert their habitations, and to be particularly dangerous to sleepers, man and beast. The
fact of its having the same name among the ancients as mouse and shrew-mouse suggests an explanation of some of
the superstitious about shrew-mice and cattle which still sur\-ive among us.
41*
308 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
great Avork on the Arachnids in ' L'Organisation clu Regne animal ' contains heantiful
drawings of the anatomy of Galeodes, but vmfortnnately, beyond the explanation of the
plates, the text is wanting. The most exhaustive account of the Galeodidae is from the
pen of the illustrious French naturalist Dufour. His " Anatomie, Physiologic, et
Histoire naturelle des Galeodes " (31) has the special advantage that the author's
previous studies on Scorpio enabled him to handle the subject comparatively. In
addition to these three works, there have been several small articles dealing with special
points. Systematic papers have naturally not been taken into account, the object of
this paper being purely anatomical and morphological.
I. The External Form and Segmentation*.
Fusion of Segments. — The general form of the Galeodidae (PI. XXVII. figs. 1, 11, 15 ;
PI. XXIX. figs. 3, 4, 6) is so well known that we need discuss only the points of mor-
phological interest.
The Galeodidae show the primitive metamerism of the body more markedly than any
other Arachnid, the first three segments of the cephalothorax being the only fused
segments in the body. The three posterior segments remain movable. The abdominal
region consists of ten segments, all of which are free. This limitation of the fusion of
■segments to the first three is a very important point in endeavouring to fix the systematic
position of the family.
In the Scorpionidse, Thelyphonidse, and Psoudoscorpionidse, while the segments of the
abdominal regions are free, the segments of the cephalothorax have been fused together.
In the Araneidse, all the segments both of the cephalothorax and of the abdomen are
fused into two groups, the first six forming the cephalothorax and the last ten forming
the abdomen. Scldzonotus is the only other Arachnid which, like Galeodes, has retained
free cephalothoracic segments, but it is not easy to make out the segmentation 'exactly.
There are certainly two free segments, and I should not be surprised if there ultimately
prove, on examination of favourable specimens, to be three, as in Galeodes.
Segmentation of the Dorsal Surface : Cephalothorax. — Behind the large plates of
the cephalic lobes {cl.), we can trace three clear segments, /. e. the 4th, 5th, and Gth, and
the remains of the 3rd not quite obliterated by the cephalic lobes. The details can
be gathered from figs. 1-7 (PI. XXVII.).
The terga of segments 5 and 6 have remained practically unmodified, and are the
direct forward continuation of the series of abdominal terga (fig. 1). The tergum of
segment 4 has undergone a striking change. The Galeodidae can bend the body not
only between the Gth and 7th segments (at the waist), but also between the 4th and
5th. To facilitate this anterior bending, the greater part of the tergum of the 4th
segment is soft and flexible, while what I assume to be its anterior edge has given rise
to two spring-like rods, the tips of which fuse anteriorly with the posterior border of a rim
* Since, in the Arachnida, the limbs are typically arranged as foUows : — two pairs grouped round the mouth, viz.,
the chelicera3 and the pedipalps, and four pairs as ambulatory legs — it is a matter of indifference whether we speak
of them as chelicerie, pedipalps, and Ist, 2nd, 3rd, and -Ith pairs of legs, or as appendages 1-6. In what follows, both
designations are used, the 1st leg meaning the 3rd appendage, and so on.
COMPAKATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 309
of cliitin projecting from under the cephalic lobes. Laterally, these rods {>', PI. XXVII.
figs. 5, 0, 7) are continued downward to the skeletal framework of the ventral surface
posterior to the bend (PI. XXVIII. fig. 15, r). These rods, which are supports for the
so-called " head," vary slightly in their points of fusion with the chitinous plate or pair
of plates just mentioned, which project from under the cephalic lobes (cf. PI. XXVII.
figs. 1, 3, 4, 6).
These projecting plates (marked 3 in the figures) are, in all the Galeodidie, separated
by a suture from tiie posterior border of the cephalic lobes themselves ; and in transverse
and longitudinal sections they are seen to run under the posterior blind ends of the lobes
(PI. XXVII. figs. 11, 12). In some genera, e.g., Bhax, the single piece is but a narrow
strip (figs. G, 7). In Galeodes the strip is wider and bent upward at an angle from the
cephalic lobes (fig. 5). It is sometimes wddest in the median line (fig. 3) ; at others,
at the sides, where it may form a pair of triangular plates (fig. 1). These are, it seems
to me, the remains of the tergum of the 3rd segment, the anterior portion of which,
together wath the terga of the 1st and 2nd segments, has been obliterated by the
cephalic lobes.
The Cephalic Lobes. — These two plates, joined by a suture along the middle line, form
one of the most striking features of the Galeodidte. Their anterior edges, which vary in
outline in different genera, are generally sharp, and pass at once into the flexible
membrane round the bases of the chelicerse. In the genera Biton and Cleobis, the anterior
edge tends to bend over to form a slight " forehead " (fig. 2). From the anterior end of
the median suture, the ocular tubercle protrudes. Where there is a slight " forehead," the
eyes project forward from it (fig. 2).
The median suture is sometimes, comparatively speaking, indistinct, the plate formed
by the two lobes being posteriorly rounded off {Rhax, fig. 6). On the other hand, the
suture may be very marked, even dividing the posterior margin of the double plate into
two lobes [Soljpuga, fig. 3).
In all the Galeodidae there is a curious area [a in the figures) on each side of the cephalic
lobes, which is not easy to explain. Pocock sviggests (6o) that these are the remains
of the proximal joints of the cheliceraj. In this interpretation I was at first inclined to
agree, but now think that they have arisen secondarily from an infolding of the cuticle
to form the strong buttresses upon Avhich the chelicerse rotate (see further, infra, p. 321).
Origin of the Cephalic Lobes. — In endeavouring to answer the question, " what are these
remarkable plates Avhich so disturb the segmentation at the anterior end of the body ? " I
have been led to refer them to the translocation of the chelicerse from a postoral to a
preoral and dorsal position. I would suggest the following explanation of the changes
which have taken place in the arrangement of the segments : —
In order to carry the enormous chelicerae, lateral processes of the first segment have
been thrown backward on to the dorsal surface, where they meet in the middle line,
giving rise to the so-called " head," which Dufour attributed to these animals. A close
examination of this " head " shows that it consists of a pair of chitinous lobes carrying
the muscles of the chelicerae ; no other muscles run into them, and, moreover, the muscles
of the chelicerae are almost, if not entirely, confined to them. Fig. 12 (PI. XXVII.),
310 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
which is a transverse section, shows that posteriorly they are a pair of blind pockets
restino- on the dorsal surface. These cephalic lobes may then be explained as the lateral
re^-ions of the first segment which, for tlie attachment of the muscles, have travelled
upward and backward in the process of tilting forward the powerful chelicerae (as shown
in the diagram, PI. XXVII. fig. 8) into the striking position which they occupy dorsally
to the mouth and labrum. The position of the chelicerge is one of the features which
distinguish the Arachnids from all other Arthropods. If the above explanation of the
origin of these lobes is correct, we ought, then, to find them, or traces of them, in all
other Arachnids.
I have already pointed out (9) the marked likeness between these lobes in Galeodes
and the cephalic lobes which appear in the embryos of Spiders. Further, by taking
account of yolk-displacement, the embryonic procephalic lobes of the Scorpionidse may
be referred to the same structures.
We have, then, to explain the embryonic cephalic lobes of Arachnids as recording the
movement of the basal regions of the chelicerse (which, from being postoral limbs, became
preoral) laterally round and above the mouth till they met in the dorsal middle line
behind the labrum and the eyes.
The only other Arachuid with the cephalic lobes as pronounced as they are in Galeodes is Schizonotus,
which, as we have seen, resembles Galeodes in the non-fusion of the last two (V three) cepbalothoracic
segments. In the majority of Arachnids, the cephalic lobes have been more or less secondarily
obscured. The two chief causes of this gradual obscuration of the cephalic lobes in the Arachnida are
(1) their complete fusion with the terga of the 4th, 5th, and 6tb cepbalothoracic segments, so that the
dorsal surface is covered by a single piece ; (2) the secondarily acquired enormous development of the
pedipalps as compared with the chelicerae, so that the cephalic lobes, which were primarily the carriers of
the originally powerful chelicerse, are no longer so pronounced as to be immediately recognizable [cf.
fig. 9). Many Arachnids still, however, show unmistakable traces of the paired lobes divided by the
median suture. In some Scorpions, the formation of the carapace out of a pair of median anterior
plates with the triangular remains of the tergum of the 3rd segment, followed by three distinct terga,
can still be made out. In Thelyphonus the lobes can still be recognized. In the Araneaj, except in
the Aviculariidse, which are in other respects also primitive, they are bent down anteriorly to form a
" forehead,"' and are still here and there traceable on the carapace, e. g. of the Drassidse.
The Ocular Tubercle. — If this view of the secondary origin of the anterior dorsal
surface is correct, il is clear that, if the eyes were primitive structures belonging to the
primitive dorsal surface, the cuticle immediately round such eyes must be part of that
original dorsal surface, and not primarily continuous with that of the new dorsal surface,
formed by the meeting of the cephalic lobes in the dorsal middle line. We find some
evidence that this is indeed the case. The ocular tubercle in very many Galeodidse
obviously protrudes from between the median suture, and in some species of RJiax it
often differs markedly in colour, being bright green, while the surrounding surface
is red or reddish brown, and in sections there are signs that the eye-tubercle is a
discontinuous element in the cuticle {ot, PI. XXXI. fig. 1).
In some other existing Arachnids, the median eyes show signs of not belonging to the surrounding
cuticle. In Scorpio they appear to be protruding through a median suture, an impression which is some-
what increased on dissection. We have, however, only to look at the drawing of the Silurian Patau-
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 311
phonus nuncivs (65) (reproduced in PI. XXVII. fig. 10) to see that this conjecture is correct. The animal
had apparently lost its eyes, but the region where the eyes normally are in Scorpions is seen to be an island
of the original dorsal surface, gradually being grown over by the cephalic lobes which, in all modem
Arachnids, have closed together in the middle line. The ocular tubercle must then be considered to be
a primitive feature. And it is worth recording that, of the Aranese, the Aviculariidse, which alone
retain an optic tubercle, have also retained other primitive features, e. r/. the coxal glands.
Segmentation of the Dorsal Surface : Abdomen. — The tergites of the abdomen continue
without change, except in the matter of size, the series begun by those of segments 5 and
G of the cephalothorax (PI. XXVII. fig. 1). As a rule, the tergites gradually decrease
in size towards the anal segment. Ithax, however, is a remarkable exception, the terga
towards the posterior end of the hody gradually widening until the large anal segment
is completely encircled {cf. fig. 13). It is, however, not certain here whether this
great encircling plate of the anal segment is really morphologically a tergum. The
tergites are, functionally, only more rigid areas of the cuticle for the protection of the
circulatory mechanism. The lateral extensions of these areas at the posterior eud of the
body in Ehas may be for the protection of the defenceless end of the body from eaemies.
The ventral position of the anus in this genus is in keeping with this suggestion.
Segmentation of the Ventral Surface. — Although there are no structures like the
cephaHc lobes to disturb the segmentation ventrally, it requires a considerable amount
of ektcidation. The first segment has practically disappeared from the ventral surface,
while the limbs which belong to it have been shifted up dorsally above the mouth.
Consequently the 2nd pair of a2)pendages become the most anterior pair of limbs
ventrally, and have moved forward to the anterior end of the ventral surface. This
forward shifting of the pedipalps has apparently forced the ventral portion of the
1st segment still iurther forward, to form the " labium," or lower half of the beak, which
will be described presently. In the majority of Galeodidse, this " labium " or sternal
surface of the 1st segment is no longer visible from the ventral surface, but in the genus
Solpuga the relations can still be made out (PI. XXVII. fig. 14).
The second segment is the first obvious component of the ventral surface (figs. 14 and
15), and this is followed by a complete series to the end of the body. The most remark-
able feature in these ventral surfaces of the segments is the almost complete absence of the
sternites. This obliteration of the sternites along the thorax is due to the coxae of the
legs meeting in the middle line, and there is evidence to show that, along the abdomen,
the areas which appear to be sternites are really the remains of limbs, also meeting
in the middle line, which have now flattened down to form part of the body-wall
{cf. section on tlie abdominal limbs, p. 328).
The remains of sternites in the Galeodidse are very slight. We can make out the
remains of three sternites, which are visible in Solpuga (fig. 14); i. e. of the fii'st three
segments. These together form a long plate, which, anteriorly, supports the labium, and
ends posteriorly between the coxse of the third pair of appendages. This posterior butt-
end of the plate is often the only part of it visible from below. The only other remains
^f a sternite in Galeodes is perhaps the triangular piece which occurs in front of the
genital operculum, between the coxae of the last pair of legs. These coxae, sloping forward,
would perhaps allow the sternite to persist in the angle between them.
312 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
The obliteration of the sternal plates by approximation of the basal joints of the limbs along the
ventral middle line, which is thus a characteristic of the Galeodidfe, is found more or less marked in all
Ai'achnids, at least for certain segments. The causes of it are not easy to see.
Figs. 15-18 (PI. XXVII.) and 1, 2 (PI. XXVIII.) show, in series, the ventral surfaces of Galeodes,
Scorpio, Thelyphonm, Phrynus, a Spider and a Chernetid, the true sternal areas being in all cases
shaded. In Phrynus [Taratitula tessellata, fig. 18) sternites are found along the whole length of the
body, except in segments 7 and 8, where they are covered by the large genital operculum. In Thelyphonus
(17) the sternites of the 1st and 2nd segments forming the labium ai'C now enclosed between the coxse of
the pedipalps. The sternum of the third segment is a fold beneath the solid plate which represents the
sternite of segment four, having been displaced by the pedipalp. A very small plate is all that remains
of the sternite of segment five. A large triangular plate is sternite six. In Scorpio (fig. 16), the first
and second sternites are no longer visible externally. The short pointed labium found in sections is all
that now remains of them. The sternites of segments three and four have quite disappeared. Sterna
five and six are present as a triangular plate in some genera. In others, even this plate has been almost
obliterated secondarily, not by the approximation of the coxse, but by the forward movement of the
genital aperture and opercula. The sternite of the 7th segment is covered by the opercula, while
the sternites of the eighth and following four segments are clear.
With regard to the abdominal sternites in Scorpio, Thelyphunus, and Phrynus, I believe the lateral
boundary of the sternite to be the attachment of the dorso-ventral muscles ; outside these are the areas
which I refer to vanished limbs [cf. PI. XXVII. figs. 16, 17, 18 Za).
In the Pseudoscorpions (PI. XXVIII. fig. 2, ? sp.) the sternites have vanished from the cephalothorax,
persisting perhaps only in the labium, and in a triangular plate between the last pair of legs which is
visible in some genera. On the abdomen, the conditions appear to resemble those in Galeodes; we
have the sternal plates, at least, very frequently, in pairs divided by a median line continuous with that
separating the coxse of the cephalothorax. On the other hand, the dorso-ventral muscles do not always
meet in the ventral middle line, but their points of attachment may have shifted.
In the Araneae, the sterna of the cephalothoracic segments are fused to form a solid plate, but in young
Epeirids just hatched (when cleared) this plate is found marked as in the figure (PI. XXVIII. fig. 1)
We here see that sterna 1 and 2 are fused to form the labium, while sterna 3, 4, 5, 6 are well marked.
The condition of the abdomen in the Spiders is not quite clear. From the approximation of the
spinning-glands in the median line, I should be inclined to think that the sternites in this group, as in
Galeodes, had disappeared from the abdominal segments.
In the Phalangidse, the sterna of the cephalothorax have disappeared, either by the approximation of
the coxse, or by the forward thrust of the genital aperture. In the Acari all conditions are found :
the sterna, in some genera, seem to be well developed on all the segments except perhaps the 1st and
2nd. I have, however, made no study of the group.
We thus have, in the Arachnida, almost every possible variation in this matter. The sterna have
almost completely vanished from the cephalothorax of some Scorpions, of the Phalangidse, and of the
Pseudoscorpions. In the Spiders they have been apj)arently obliterated from the abdomen. In the
Pedipalpi, traces of them persist along the whole body, having completely vanished only in the anterior
end of the abdomen, where they are covered over by the large genital operculum*. Lastly, in
the Galcodidic the sternites have vanished along the whole length of the body, the only persistent traces
being the supporting plate of the labium and the triangular piece between the last pair- of legs.
These diff"erent departures from the primitive conditions of the segments are so very distinct that it is
impossible to deduce the existing Arachnids one from another : they can only be different speciali-
zations of some common racial form in which the sternites were distinct along the whole length of the
* Laurie (47) describes a plate roofing the genital vestibule to which a pair of dorso-ventral muscles are attached ;
this is almost certainly the sternite of the 2nd abdominal segment.
COMPARATIVE MOBPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 313
body. They were, perhaps, at first obliterated at the anterior end of the body, or rather converted into
the labium by the grouping of the two first pairs of limbs round the mouth (see p. 311), and then
secondarily, in the genital segment, by the change of a pair of limbs into genital appendages (see p. 328,
and PI. XXIX. fig. 14).
The Numhev couJ Character of the Abdominal Segments. — The abdomeu in the Galeodidse
consists of ten segments, which, as above stated, are distinct. They are fairly iiiiifonn,
i. e. they ta^oer away in a typical manner, showing no specialization into a tail of any
kind. The last segment is little more than an anal jjapilhx except in Ilhax. The cuticle
is adapted for the great extensions to which the abdomen is liable. After a full meal
the abdominal region may be nearly twice as thick and twice as long as at ordinary
times. While the ventral and dorsal surfaces are protected by more solid chitinous plates
(tergites and " sternites " *), the intersegmental and lateral integuments are very thin
and flexible. Fig. 6, PI. XXXIV., shows the remarkable folding of the integument
between two segments of a contracted abdomen ; this is even more pronounced in the
more anterior segments. The fine structure of this flexible integument will be described
elsewhere.
Great variations are found in the hairiness of the abdomen. Swollen abdomens often
look smooth, owing to the drawing apart of the hairs, which in the contracted state
would be crowded together. For this reason, contracted specimens are often very
hairy. This, however, does not explain the whole facts. In some, the lateral membranes
are smooth, in others hairy. The " sternites " are smooth, in others again hairy. The
hairiness of the lateral membrane is often felt-like ; that of the " sternites " repeats that
of the cox0e of the legs.
The number of segments in the abdomen of Arachnids varies considerably. The greatest number,
twelve, occurs in Thelyphonus, Phrynus, and Scorpio, and, according to Mr. Pocock, in Schizonotus.
The abdominal segmentation of the Pseudoscorpiouidte is very difficult to unravel. The anal papilla
may perhaps represent a segment, but there are reasons for believing that it does not. But whether the
first free tergite, in those cases in which there are undoubtedly eleven tergites, belongs to the abdomen
or to the cephalothoras I have been unable to determine. In view of the free cephalothoracic segments
of Galeodes and Schi-onoiiis, and the absence of a marked waist, either interpretation is possible. I
suggest that the point may be settled by a careful examination of the dorso-ventral muscles. I do not
agree with Hansen (33) in claiming the ti'iangular piece sometimes seen behind the coxae of the last
pair of legs as belonging to the first abdominal segment, but think that it belongs to the last cephalo-
thoracic segment, and, as in Thelyphonus and Galeodes, has been left bare by the inner anterior slope
of the coxse. But the Chernetidse show great and puzzling variations. In some there is a clear
triangular piece in front of the genital plate ; in others the last pair of coxae seem to reach back so as
to cover, ventrally, the anterior segments of the abdomen (lO; compare figs. 1 & 2).
In the Spiders there are, as a rule, tea se^^ments, while in the Phalangidae and in some Acariuae the
number is still further reduced.
This difference in the number of abdominal segments is not a matter of any great morphological
importance. The specialization of the Arachnids has clearly taken place at the anterior end of the
body, in the grouping of the first two pairs of limbs round the mouth and in the development of the
limbs of the four following segments as walking-legs. This cephalothoracic region, specialized for loco-
* As above stated, I do not consider them to be morphologically sternites, but rather limb-areas, i. e. areas where
limbs have vanished by flattening down.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY. VOL. VI. 42
314 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
motion and prehension, is followed by a well-demarcated abdominal region specialized as a distensible
sac-like receptacle for digestion and reproduction. This specialization comprises all the abdominal
segments in Galeodidse, Pseudoscorpionidse, Araneidse, Phalangidae, Acaridse, while in the Scorpionidse,
Thelyphonidse, and Schizonotidje a few of the most posterior segments form together a kind of caudal
appendage secondarily specialized for different purposes. In all discussions as to the primitive segmen-
tation of the abdomen, we have to bear in mind that its swollen condition is a secondary specialization.
In Scorpio and Thehjphomis, although the posterior segments of the abdomen take no part in the
formation of the visceral sac, they are greatly specialized for other functions. Moreover, these tail-
formations difPer too greatly to be considered primitive structures. The lengthening of the tail-
segments of Scorpio was most probably a secondary and compensatory specialization to allow of the
use of the terminal sting, as the anterior abdominal segments were becoming sac-like and thus no longer
capable of bending backward.
We may, I think, safely conclude from the varied conditions of the abdominal segmentation of existing
Arachnids that the abdominal segments of the ancestral form were quite unspecialized. The differences in
the number of the segments specialized for distension shows clearly that neither this nor the " tail "
is primitive. In Scorpio, seven form the distensible sac and five the tail. In Thelyphonus, nine form
the distensible sac and three a totally different tail ; while in Galeodes ten, in Cliernes jierhaps eleven,
form the distensible sac, no segments at all being specialized into a tail. It is impossible to deduce these
forms from any specialized ancestor.
The reduction in the number of segments in some Arachnids is doubtless in some way due to the
excessive weight of the distended sac.
We have thus tolerably clear evidence that the original and most important specialization of the
Arachnidan abdomen was into a digestive and reproductive sac, while the anterior region was specialized
for locomotion.
Diaphragm or Waist. — Between the 6th and 7th segments, i. e. between the cephalo-
thorax and abdomen, there is, in the Galeodidae, no true specialized waist, although there
is a strong intersegmental constriction, the abdomen being able to bend up almost at right
angles to the cephalothorax at this point. Internally, this constriction has given rise
to a very striking " diaphragm," which has already been described and figured by Kittary
(41). It forms a very complete wall between the interior of the cephalothorax and that
of the abdomen, and is pierced by the dorsal vessel, the alimentary canal, the nerve-
cords, and the tracheae. Close examination shows that this diaphragm is due, as
stated, to a strong indrawing of the intersegmental membrane between the above-
mentioned segments, so that it is composed partly of a chitinous infolding and partly
of muscle-bands.
It is clear that if the opposite two internal faces of such a deep segmental constriction
fuse together, they form a diaphragm : if they remain unfused, they form a waist. In
the Galeodidse we seem to have an unsj)ecialized ai'rangement, the intersegmental
infolding being fused only in its deeper parts, forming the diaphragm, while the outer
parts of the fold remain open, making some approach to a waist.
Waists or diaphragms appear to be characteristic of the Arachnids. The Pedipalpi and the Aranese
have highly specialized waists. Scorpio has secondarily lost all traces of its waist and has only a
diaphragm. The Pseudoscorpions show very deep constrictions laterally and ventrally, but not dor-
sally ; these constrictions thus do not form a true waist. The Phalangidie and Acari are the only forms
which appear to have lost all traces of the former waist. This is perhaps to be correlated with the
diminution of the abdominal region characteristic of the former and of many of the latter.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 315
The origin of the waist or diaphragm in the Arachnida is not far to seek. It divides the body into
the two well-defined regions above described, the anterior knit together by muscles to form a specialized
locomotory mechanism, the posterior a distensible bag for the digestive and the reproductive apparatus.
It seems to me that the development of the former region would necessarily draw in the intersegmental
constriction between the two regions.
The function of the diaphragm will be better explained in the section on the alimentary system. It
supplies, as we shall see, a kind of neck to the digestive bag, which serves to protect the organs of the
cephalothorax from undue pressure on the part of the contents of the abdomen when it is greatly
distended.
The Segments — Special Structures.
Having thus reviewed the general segmentation of the body, we have to describe
certain special structures connected with the segments, such as the beak, the eyes,,
and the limbs.
First Segment: the Beak. — The beak* is a marked feature in the Galeodidse. It
projects anteriorly from between the basal joints of the pedipalps, ventrally to the
chelicerai. The mouth being at its tip, we may safely assume that it is composed of a
labrum and of a ventral labium fused together along their edges. It is represented in
PI. XXVII. figs. 11, 14, and in sections in PL XXVIII. figs. 3, 4, 5, 6.
The labrum, which is in all Arachnids a structure sui generis, is keeled dorsally and
very firm ; the keel may originally have been due to the jn'essure of the chelicerse on
each side. It is, moreover, quite immovably fixed to the coxal joints of the pedipalps
(PI. XXVIII. fig. 3), W'hich are themselves rigidly attached to the ventral skeleton.
Anteriorly, an arrangement of feathered setse projects from the labrum in such a way as
to form a sieve for the straining of the animal- juices, which form the characteristic food
of the Arachnids. The setae are arranged in a vertical row on each side of the mouth,
the two rows lying very close to each other (PI. XXVII. fig. li). The setae of the same
side are joined together by cross-pieces, so that the sieve has regular rectangular meshes
(PI. XXVIII. fig. 6).
The labium, w'hich is applied all along to the base of the labrum, so as, with it, to
form a beak, ends anteriorly in two fleshy lobes (PI. XXVII. fig. 14), each provided
with a long, feathered, tactile hair. The tip of the labium seems to be movable by
means of muscles, but the exact mechanism is difficult to make out. In the ventral
middle line, the labium is strengthened by a chitinous plate folded along the median
line. This is a prolongation of the sternal plate betw^een the coxae of the pedipalps ;
the whole plate may be considered to be the fused sternites of the 1st, 2nd, and
3rd segments {cf. PI. XXVII. fig. 14 with PI. XXVIII. fig. 3, and p. 311).
I have not hesitated to call the parts composing the beak the labrum and labium,
because I can see no reason why they should not be so. They form the upper and lower
maro-ins of an anterior mouth ; the labrum has the typical position of a labrum or
prostomium (i. e. if we take into account the shifting forward of the chelicerse), and the
labium is the protruded anterior margin to the sternal surface bounding the mouth
posteriorly. As ah'cady suggested, this protrusion is no doubt due to the distortion of
* " Eostre buccule,"' " labium haustelhforme,'' " languette sternale," &c. of authors.
42*
316 MK. H. M. BEEXARD ON THE
the first segment, by the shifting forward of the pedipalps, when tlie chelicerse left the
ventral surface. I therefore cannot follow Croneberg (28) in his endeavour to deduce
these parts from fused limbs. Such a derivation brings hopeless confusion into tbe
segmentation, where none really exists. The solid chitinous framework round the posterior
portion of the beak is necessary to counteract the action of the muscles which expand
the CBSophagus for the pumping-in of the food (PI. XXVIII. figs. 3, i, 5). The
significance of this position of the pumping-apparatus in the Galeodidse, viz. Avitliin the
beak, will be referred to later, in the section on the alimentary canal.
From the description above given of the origin of the beak of Galeodes, it is clear that it raust be
considered to be a primitive Arachnidan characteristic, since it arose as a natural consequence of the
shifting of the chelicerse and of the pedipalps to positions above and at the sides of the prostomium.
We have abundant evidence among the Arachnida that the beak was, as contended, a primitive structure.
In Thelyphonus, where the fusion of the basal joints of the pedipalps has rendered a beak, as such,
unnecessary, it nevertheless persists : that is, it is in a position where it could not well have been
■secondarily developed. Examination further shows that here also its floor contains, like that of
Galeodes. a chitinous plate somewhat folded anteriorly, which can be traced in sections to the transverse
infolding of the cuticle at the anterior end of the large sternite of the 4th segment {cf. p. 312). This
infolding is apparently the sternal surface of the 3rd segment, crushed in by the enormous backward
growth of the coxse of the pedipalps (PI. XXVTII. figs. 11, 12, 13, 14). This beak, like that of Galeodes,
•contains the sucking-apparatus.
The Pseudoscorpions * and the Gamasidce t are the only other Arachnids known to me which possess
well-developed beaks, but the mouth-parts of all the other Arachnids can be best deduced from a
primitive beak which has been variously modified.
Starting from Galeodes (PI. XXVIII. fig. 5), with the mouth at the tip of the beak, we have a
complete series which shows the gradual reduction of that organ. In the Chernetid;e (fig. 10) the
mouth lies ventrally, in a labrum with a dorsal keel, the pointed labium fitting into the oral aperture;
the lining of the mouth is finely striated transversely. The next stage is that of Scorpio (fig. 9), in
■which the dorsally-keeled labrum, though of considerable length above, is shortened ventrally, the
mouth having travelled back towards the body, so that it is impossible longer to speak of a beak. The
shortened labium is, however, still a pointed median process, as in the Chernetidse.
In Phrynus (fig. 7) we have a process almost the opposite of that in Scorpio, viz. a great reduction
of the labrum, while the long pointed chitinous support of the labium remains as an anterior prolongation
of the first clear sternite. This labium has two divergent set;e at its tip, as in Galeodes. In marked
contrast to Thelyphunus, where the beak has been enclosed between the pedipalps, in Phrynus the
labrum and labium seem to have been forced apart by these same limbs. The mouth, which is
immediately under the labrum, is thus no longer bounded ventrally by the labium, but by the pedipalps,
which meet in the middle line. The labrum, though greatly reduced, is quite distinct and shows the
dorsal keel ; it ran best be seen by removing the dorsal shield and bending back the chelicerse.
* It is worth recording also that the larval Pseudoscorpions are provided with au enormous sucking-beak ;
cf. Metschnikofi' (55).
t Judging from Winkler's figure (76, Taf. iii. 15), this is a typical beak comparable with that of Galeodes, and
contains the sucking-apparatus along the greater part of its length. Winkler, however, calls the labium the maxillae.
The long pointed process which he calls the under-lip must be some specialized structure, although its superficial
resemblance to the process in Phryiws, which I believe is a true under-lip, is certainly suggestive of an interpretation
of the mouth-parts of Phrynus differing from that given in the text.
COMPAEATIYE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.T:. 317
The Spiders (fig. 8) show still further modifications : the labnim is round and fleshy and directed
downward ; it is opposed by a distinct labium also bent downward and formed by the anterior edge of
the sternal plate. The opposed inner oral surfaces are finely striated transversely, as in the Pseudo-
scorpions and Thclyphonidffi. The cosal joints of the pedipalps function as maxilhe on each side of
the mouth. We thus have, in the Arauese, the mouth placed more vcntrally than in any other Arachnid *.
Asa concomitant change, we have the chelicerae bent downwards from the almost directly forward position
which they occupy in most other Arachnids. The Aviculariidic, however, which have retained other
primitive features [cf. p. 311), still have the ehelieer<E pointing directly forward.
The mouth-structures of the Arachnida seem to me, then, to be dedueible from a beak such as we
have in Ga/eodes, although there can be no doubt tiiat this particular beak is itself considerably
specialized. As we shall see in the section on alimentation, all these beaks and mouth-parts are
specialized for the straining of the juices crushed out of the prey by the chelicerie, and in some cases
by the pedipalps also. The basal joints of the pedipalps (in Scorpio those of the first and second limbs
as well) are as a rule specialized to prevent the escape of such juices and to conduct them towards the
mouth. The series of figures and diagrams illustrating the mouth-parts (PI. XXVIII. figs. 5, 7, 8)
also show the changing positions of the pumping-apparatus ; this will be discussed in detail in the
section on the alimentary canal.
The Positions of the Eyes. — The varying jiositions of the ocular tubercle with the
median eyes are shown in PL XXVII. figs. 1, 3, 0. We gather, from the embryology
of Scorpio, that the eyes of Scorpio had originally the same anterior position, but that
they at a later stage travelled back along the suture, reaching their utmost limit of
backward movement in. a genus which takes its name from this fact {Opisthojjhthalmns).
It is a curious fact that in most Scorpions and in some Galeodidge the line of the
suture runs over the tubercle. This can be explained only as a secondary acquirement.
In addition to the median eyes, Galeodes lias one or two pairs of lateral eyes, which
appear, in many cases at least, to be rudimentary. Their position is shown in PL XXIX.
fig. 4, le (14). If the above account (p. 310) of the secondary origin of the anterior
dorsal surface of Arachnids is correct, the lateral eyes of the Arachnids are all either
secondary formations or else have wandered off from the ocular tubercle on to the
cephalic lobes {cf. section on the sensory organs, p. 318).
Summary of the Modification of the First Segment. — We have, then, in the 1st segment
a pair of limbs (whicli will be described later), a pair of median and one or two pairs of
lateral eyes, a labrum and labium, together forming a beak with a mouth at its tip, the
labium being an anterior prolongation of the ventral surface. The present position of
these parts lias been brought about by the development of the first pair of limbs into
seizing-organs, which have travelled upward and forward from the sides of the mouth till
thev meet in the middle line above the labrum. The basal regions of these chelicerae
form the cephalic lobes, wliich cover the original dorsal surface of the segment and extend
backwards over the 2nd and part of the 3rd segments. The only part of the original
dorsal surface of the segment now visible is the ocular tubercle. The concomitant
travelling forward of the basal joints of the limbs of the 2nd segment to the sides of
the mouth has forced forward the ventral portion of the 1st segment till it has opposed
* The position assigned by Steeker (67) to the mouth of Gibl/occUuni is clearly an oversight.
318 ME, H. M. BERNARD ON THE
the labnmi and fused witli it, the two togetlier forming a beak. These modifications of
the 1st segment of the Arachnidan body (which have been again modified in the different
families) appear to me to be the essential characteristic of the class.
Second Segment. — The 2nd segment carries the pedipalps, developed primarily as
sensory organs, as will be described in the section on the limbs. Dorsally this segment
is completely obscured by the cephalic lobes of the 1st segment ; indeed, nearly all that
remains of it is now comprised in the basal regions of the pedipalps and the cuticle
immediately surrounding them.
Third Segment. — Passing to the 3rd segment, viz. that which carries the first pair of
ambulatory legs, we find, dorsally, portions of the tergite jirotruding from under the
cephalic lobes, while ventrally this segment is the smallest of the five segments com-
posing the under-surface of the cephalothorax. The limbs which it carries are, as
we shall see, in process of transformation from walking-legs with claws into a second
pair of sensory limbs. This segment is further interesting because the openings of the
coxal glands occur on it behind the coxse.
In Phrynus and Thelyphonus we find the tendency to reduction and compression of this segment
carried still further; indeed, in the latter, neither the coxal joints of its limbs nor its sternum any
longer take part in the formation of the ventral surface. This compression of the 3rd segment is of
great morphological interest in connexion with the origin of the endosternite (see next page).
Mil, 5th, and 6th Segments. — The following three segments are freely movable, a primi-
tive feature shared to some extent with Schlzoiwtus. Posterior to the coxae of the first
of these occur large stigmatic openings of the tracheal system, the significance of which
will be discussed in the section on Respiration. These segments carry the three posterior
pairs of limbs, which, in the Galeodidte, are those specialized for locomotion.
The Abdominal Segments. — The segments themselves require but little further descrip-
tion. The 1st segment has a median genital aperture, covered by a pair of opercula
opening posteriorly and towards the median line. These ojjercitla, as will be shown
below, are the vestigial remains of vanished limbs. The 2nd and 3rd segments have
(also under opercula closely resembling those of the genital aperture) a pair of stigmatic
openings into tracheae. The stigmatic opercula in the genus Galeodes are armed
posteriorly with rows of short stout spines j)rojecting backward, " the stigmatic combs."
These serve, I think, princiijally to keeji the stigmatic apertures in communication with
the surrounding air, which would certainly be difficult when the abdomen is contracted.
In the genus Galeodes, the -Ith segment has a single median stigma, which, however,
is sometimes closed, although still connected with the tracheal system by a much
diminished tracheal tube. In Rhax, this median stigma has vanished altogether.
A study of the ventral surface leads almost irresistibly to the conclusion that the
three pairs of opercula on the first three segments were once followed by a complete
series which have vanished pi-ogressively from before backward.
The anus opens, except in Rhax, through a terminal median slit stretching almost
completely across the anal papilla.
COMPAEATIYE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 319
II. The Internal Apodematous Skeletal System.
The skeleton of the segmented animals was primitively limited to the external cuticle
-which formed Avhat is called an exoskeleton. In specialized forms, the modiiications of
the sgements have, in many cases, given rise to infoldings of this exoskeleton, so that a
kind of endoskeleton has teen developed. Such an endoskeleton, or system of apodemes,
attains a remarkable and varied development in the cephalothoracic region of the
Arachnids, i. e. in that region specialized for locomotion where the muscles are most
highly developed. The posterior infoldings, viz., those which limit the closely knit
locomotory region posteriorly, together form the waist, which need not be again
described. The complicated infoldings between the six segments anterior to this wrist,
Tiowever, claim attention.
The Ventral System of Apodemes. — T^"e find in the Galeodidae a ventral system of
apodemes forming a nearly rigid framework, or, rather, two frameworks joined by a
flexible membrane between the 4th and 5th segments. These frameworks are largely
formed by the coxae of the limbs, which meet in the middle line and practically form
the ventral surface, having apparently obliterated nearly all traces of the original sternal
surface (see above, p. 311). Perhaps the flat keel thrown up into the body along tbe
middle line may represent the remains of the sterna. Figures of this complicated inner
surface have been given by both Kittary and Blanchard, but the details are obscured by
the endosternite (/. e. by the largest pair of apodemes between the 3rd and 4th segments)
which these authors have drawn in position. PI. XXVIII. fig. 15 gives a view of
the whole ventral surface of a Galeodes orabs, with the endosternite removed but placed
at the side (fig. 15 a).
This ventral skeletal framework is, as stated, due to the rigidity of thecoxal joints and
to their meeting in the middle line ; it needs no special notice. Certain modifications
of the transverse ridges will be mentioned below. One pair of infoldings, however,
require special mention.
The Ejidostermte. — This characteristic Arachnidan structure rises as a pair of simple
infoldings of the cuticle between the 3rd and 4th segments (PI. XXVIII. fig. 17). The
two cuticular folds meet and interlock in the middle line (fig. 18) above the nerve-cords
and beneath the alimentary canal (PL XXVII. fig. 12). Sloping backward from their
origin, after meeting, they expand into plates to allow of increased surface for muscular
attachment. Where the apodemes arise from the cuticle, they are very hard and thick,
breaking and tearing the sections, but in the expanded part they are softer, and offer
l)ut little resistance to the microtome razor. Histologically, they agree entirely with
tbe outer cuticle, of which they are obviously infoldings.
Tlie position of tlie apodemes forming the endosternite behind tbe 3rd segment,
which is much compressed, is what one might expect. The three anterior segments have
become firmly fused together, probably in the process of forcing the limbs of the fii\st
two segments into positions in front of and at the sides of the mouth. In this process
the 3rd segment seems to have suffered most compression. But compression of a
jsegment natiu'ally means, as a rule, a strong muscular strain on the constriction
320 ME. H. M. BEKNARD ON THE
beliincl it. Hence the formation of powerful apodemes behind it. The apodematous
system of the Crayfish supplies us with examples of the same rule (5).
We may thus in Guleodcs recognize two regions of special compression, one com-
prising the first three segments, which resulted from the translocation of the mouth-
limbs ; this gave rise to the endosternite. The other comprises the three remaining
cephalothoracic segments ; this has given rise to the waist and diaphragm. These two
sejjarate phases of the specialization of the Arachnida are still clearly distinct in the
Galeodidse, which are almost, if not quite, alone in the retention of this primitive feature.
In front of the endosternite of Galeodes, there is on each side a small fibrous plate
susjiended by means of tendon-like strands, as shown in PI. XXVIII. figs. 15 a, 16 [p).
Assuming these tendons to be the remains of muscular attachments, it seems not unlikely
that these plates are the last remains of apodemes or constrictions between the 2nd and
3rd segments. Sections show them to be a sponge-like arrangement of tendinous fibres
(fig. 19) with irregular spaces. (Compare sections on the muscular system and coxal
glands, where these fibrous plates will be referred to again.)
Having already discussed the relation between the endosteruites of the Arachnids in a separate paper
(13), it is not necessary to do more here than to give my conclusions.
There must originally have been a well-developed system of intersegmental membranes along the
whole body. In the abdominal region these have persisted to lend to that part of the body its great
powers of distension. In the anterior region, however, which is specialized for locomotion and
prehension, muscular action has drawn these membranes in to form an endoskeletal system for
muscular attachment. Owing to the different degrees and methods of compression of the cephalothorax
in the Arachnids, the endosternite necessarily varies greatly in the different families.
In Scorpio the endosternite proper arises, as in Galeodes, from between the 3rd and 4th segments,
but is now complicated by secondary fusion with the diaphragm. In the Spiders, the segments of the
thorax being all evenly compressed, the endosternite consists of four pairs of apodemes which meet in
the centre, the second pair of which correspond with the endosternite of Galeodes and Scorpio, while
the 1st pair is perhaps represented in Galeodes by the fibrous plates above described. In Phrynus the
endosternite is difficult to unravel ; it may perhaps represent only the first pair of apodemes of the
Spiders with secondary attachment of dorso-veutral muscles. In Thelyphoniis we have a long fenestrated
endosternite which may correspond with that of the Spiders ; the component apodemes not, however,
meeting in a point.
Other Special Apodematotis Structures. — In the constriction between segments 4
and 5, two pairs of chitinous processes have to be mentioned. A round hollow^ rod rises
from the inner end of eacli stigmatic aperture, and holds up the endosternite, so that the
muscles attached to its ventral and lateral surfaces should not pull it down ujoon the
tracbcEe (PI. XXVIII. figs, 15, 16, 18, clir). Further, two very solid folds of the lateral
wall rise from the anterior outer corners of the coxa3 of the 5th segment. These are
continuous with, and form rigid ventral attachments of, the rods (remains of the terga
of the 4th segment) which, on the dorsal surface, fuse with the posterior edge of the
tergum of the 3rd segment projecting from beneath the cephalic lobes ; these appear to
act like springs to support the so-called " head " {cf. p. 309, PL XXVII. figs. 1-6, and
PL XXVIII. fig. 15, r).
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^i. 321
Along the anterior surface of each coxa there is a secondary fold which projects
internally and forms a solid buttress ; round the distal points of these buttresses the
limbs rotate (PI. XXYIII. fig. 15 b).
This support is especially strengthened in the case of the 5th limb, which has probably
to work upon or sweep round the body more actively than either the one in front of it
or that behind it.
These buttress-like supports to the limbs appear to be a feature common to all the
Arachnids ; the folding-in of the cuticle to form them is visible to the naked eye on the
anterior faces of the coxa3 of any large Spider or Scorpion.
There are similar buttresses for the support of the chelicera?, each of which thus also
rotates round a single solid point. Their position is, however, remarkable. They occur
latei-ally inside the cephalic lobes and under the remarkable areas found at each side
of the " head " iu all the Galeodida? (PL XXVII. figs. 1, 3, 6, 7 a). I at first thought
that these areas were the remains of the coxse of the chelicerse (cf. Pocock, 6o). If
so, these buttresses might be homologous with those of the other limbs. But, as will
be more fully explained in the section on the limbs, the evidence is rather in favour
of these particular buttresses being independent formations (see below).
III. The Limbs.
The limbs of Galeodes have been so often fiu'ured and described that no detailed
account of them is required here. We therefore confine ourselves to points which are
either new or else of special ruorphological interest.
The Chelicerce. — The chelicerae in Galeodes are two-jointed, having, in addition to the
shaft, a ventrally-placed movable segment.
There is strong reason for believing that this limb, in all Arachnids, was originally
three-jointed. We find, for instance, three joints in Scorpio and in the Phalangidse.
The two-jointed condition is therefore due to secondary loss of one joint.
On the inner face of the chelicerse of Galeodes (PL XXVII. fig. 11) we find a very
clearly marked area wiiich, on comparison with the corresponding limb of Scorjoio, is to
all appearance the remains of a former proximal joint {cf. PL XXIX. fig. 1, b', d). On
the outer side, but belonging to the cephalic lobes, there is the curious cuticular area
(PL XXVII. fig. 1 a) characteristic of the Galeodida;, Avhich Pocock thinks may perhaps
also be part of the lost proximal joint. In support of this view, it must be noted that
under this sclerite, and as a fold of it, there occurs the buttress-like support to the limb,
like the buttress-supports in the coxse of the other legs. In spite of this fact, however,
this homology does not commend itself, for the following reasons : —
In the first place, this buttress-support of the chelicerte can hardly be the homologue
of the buttresses in the coxae of the other limbs, inasmuch as its position in that case
would be difficult to explain. The two anterior pairs of limbs have been simply folded
forward, the chelicerse above, and the pedipalps below or at the sides of the mouth, so
that the anterior surfaces of their coxa3 face one another towards the median plane.
The homologue of the buttress-folds ought, therefore, to be fouad along the coxal areas
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 43
322 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
on the inner faces of these limbs, where, indeed, those of the pedipalps still are
{PI. XXVIII. fig. 15). On the other hand, any homology between the buttresses on
the outside of the chelicerae of Galeodes with those of the pedipalps would mean that the
chelicersB had rotated through nearly 180°, which seems highly improbable. It is safer,
then, to conclude that these cheliceral buttresses in Galeodes are new formations,
articulating, not the 2nd joint with the coxa, but the coxa with the body, the 2ad joint
and the coxa fusing together. It is possible also that the secondary infoldings necessary
to form these buttresses gave rise to the areas («) at the sides of the " head."
I would like in this connection to suggest that the stridulating apparatus formed by
a series of folds running along the smooth areas on the inner surfaces of the chelicersB of
Solpuga and other genera (PI. XXIX. fig. 1 c.', sir.) may have started from the two hard
€dges of a buttress infolding, which, as I have shown, ought at one time to have been
present in this place *. That the Galeodidse stridulated by rubbing the chelicerae
one against another was described by Pallas t a hundred years ago. Hansen (33) has
recently studied the series of stridulating ridges, which are quite coarse enough to have
arisen in the way suggested.
The chelicerae ai'e enormously developed as the only seizing-limbs, the pedipalps having
no accessory seizing-apparatus. Observers relate that, in order to bring the beak up
to the wound in its prey, the animal works the chelicerse with a sawing motion, holding
tight with one to drive the other deeper in f.
In no other Arachnid are these limbs so powerful as in the Galeodiclse, although in the Spiders and
Phalangids and many Acarids they are, as in Galeodes, the only seizing-organs. In other Arachnids
— Scorpions, Phrynidse, Thelyphonidse, and Pseudoscorpions — the chelicerse have become secondarily
subordinated to the pedipalps as the principal organs of prehension.
Another difference of great interest is the position of the movable digit of the chelicerse. The
Aviculariidse and the Spiders generally, the Phrynidas, Schizonotus and Thelyphonus have the digit
folding downward ; on the other hand, the Scorpions, Pseudoscorpions, and Phalangids have the cheli-
cerse in the form of pincers, which open from side to side; lastly, in Galeodes and some Aearidse the
pincers open and shut dorso-ventrally. Now, starting from the claw-like limb (PI. XXIX. fig. 1 a) as
the most primitive, a rotation through 90° would bring the movable digit into the position of that of
Scorpio ; but it would require to twist through 180° in order to bring the movable digit into the position
found in Galeodes. This, it seems to me, puts rotation as the solution of the difficulty out of court.
We can, however, account for the different forms of the chelicerse without any excessive rotation. If
we start from a primitive limb of three joints (as shown in the diagram PI. XXIX. fig. 1 a), one form
would be produced by the two distal joints fusing to form a long claw-like joint which bent down upon
the proximal joint (fig. 1 b, c). The second form would be produced by the two distal joints forming
pincers which articulate with the body by means of the proximal joint (fig. 1, b' , c'). Some evidence in
favour of this view we find in the following facts : — (1) the 3-jointed limbs are only retained in cases where
they form pincers; (2) there are no visible traces of any fusion of joints to form the proximal joint of
* I think traces of this fold may also be seen in markings on the inner faces of the proximal joints of the chelicerae
in Scorpio.
t Lichtenstein & Herbst (48), p. 5S : — " Wenn man sie eingesperrt hat und also reizt, so kann man au der Wuth
iind Unerschrockenbeit womit sie auf A lies losgeht Wunder sehen. Sie erregt alsdann durch das Aneinanderreiben
ihrer Fangscbeeren eine Art von Gezwitscher und ist in lauter heftigen Bewegung."
+ The same, p. 28 : — " Kurz, die Solpuge hat das fiirchterUcbste Gebiss unter alien Geschcipfen, nach Verhaltniss
■schrecklicher als der Tiger, das Krokodill, die Brillenscblange und der Haytisch."
COMPAEATIVE MOEFHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 323
the clieliceraj, say, of the Aviculariidai or Pedipalpi; (3) a longitudinal section through the chelicera of
Phrynus (PI. XXIX. fig. 2) shows a distinct sclerite {j) where such a sclcrite might be found if a joint
had disappeared at that spot. Further investigations, however, are necessary. In the meautime I put
forward the above suggestion as an alternative to the highly improbable assumjjtion that any limb could
rotate through 180°.
Ou the inner sides of the chelicerae, thick rows of feathered setce, running longitudinally
along the digits, serve to conduct the juices of victims towards the mouth {cf. p. 357).
These setae give a very hairy character to the cheliceraj, and though the hairs end
towards the hard red points of the digits, the pores of vanished hairs can be seen
traversing the chitin right to the tips.
The Reputed Foisoiwus Character of the Bite. — There being no specialized poison-
glands, I would suggest that to the exudation through these pores is due the dangerously
poisonous character which is attributed by nearly all writers, both ancient and modern,
to the bite of this animal *. I do not think that this almost universal testimony can be
refuted without actual experiment. Unlike the Spiders, whose needle-like jaws can
convey the venom from poison-bags with muscular walls into the slightest wound, the
Galeodidse must bite through the skin and plimge the tips of their pincers into the
soft tissues before the jjoison takes effect. This is in accord with all the ancient accounts
that only the tenderest parts of the body are bitten.
If this suggested origin of the poisonous effect of the bite of Galeodes from the exudation through open
setal pores prove correct, it is not without interest for the morphologist. PI. XXIX. fig. 2 shows the tip
of the movable digit of Phrynus, with a special bunch of setae on its outer edge. In the Pseudoscorpious
these are absent, but are rejilaeed by a series of tubes leading into specialized spinning-glands. In the
Spiders these setae are also absent, but there is one large poison-gland opening also practically on the
same spot, while in Galeodes there are no setae at the tip of the digit, but a great number of setal pores
presumably exuding poisonous matter without any special gland formation. The bearing of this upon
the probability of the origin of both spinning- and poison-glands from setiparous glands is obvious (see
further, pp. 376 and 383).
The Flac/eltum. — The chelicerae, in the Galeodidce, are provided with remarkable sensory
fiagella (i. e. highly specialized sette) which vary greatly in shape in the different genera
(PL XXVII. fig. 11). It is not certain that these are contiued to the male alone, as was
once thought. The true explanation of the inconstancy of their appearance I have not
been able to ascertain. The chelicerae are said to be much smaller in the males than in
the females.
The extraordinary combs on the fixed digits of the chelicerje in the Pseudoscorpious may be homologous
with these fiagella ; they stand out at about the same spot, and in both cases are associated with a
tuft of feathered setae. The combs, however, are not formed like true setae, but, as is easily seen iu
transverse sections, are folds (apparently rigid) of the hard outer glassy layer of the chitin; they are
therefore extremely thin and transparent.
The Ped'q)cil])s. — While the cheliceraj have folded together over the mouth so as
to lie parallel to the median Une, the coxte of the pedipalps make an angle with the
median line slightly less than 45°, the beak being wedged in between them (PI. XXVIII.
* Cf. the accounts given by Lichtenstein and Herbst, and by Dufour.
43*
•324 ME. H. M. BEENAED OJSI THE
fig. 15 a). The distal portions of these limbs, however, which are leg-like, are arranged
parallel to the median plane.
The pedipalps are carried in this leg-like fashion in the Aranese, the Phalangidfe, and the Schizo-
notidae ; whereas in the Thelvphonidse, Phrynidae, Scorpions, and Pseudoscorpions they lie in the
horizontal plane. This latter is probably a secondary specialization, in adaptation to a life under
stones or bark.
Starting from some primitive leg-like appendage, such as that figured (PI. XXIX. fig. 5), we can
deduce the pedipalps of the Arachnids along two different lines of specialization. From the position of
these limbs, they would tend to become sensory organs, as well as seizing organs accessory to the
chelicerse. In the Phalangidse, they seem to be little specialized in either direction, being provided with
a claw. In the Galeodidse and the Arauese their specialization is almost entirely sensory, while in
Schizonotus, Thelyphonus, and Phrynus we Lave variously developed forms of seizing claws and pincers.
This specialization reaches its extreme in Scorpio and Chelifer, in which the pedipalps have developed
enormously powerful pincers. This chelate condition of the pedipalps has thus, I think, departed
furthest from the primitive leg-like pedipalp of the ancestral form.
In Galeodes the pedipalps are very long (PI. XXIX. fig. 3), in Uliax very short
(fig. 4) ; in both cases they are powerful limbs, and, without having any definite claws
or seizing organs, almost certainly help to hold jjrey by encircling it. The chief function
of these limbs is undoubtedly sensory. They are extremely hairy, specially noteworthy
being the long silken hairs (a few of which are shown in PL XXIX. fig. 3, and their
insertions in the cuticle in PI. XXXII. figs. 13, 14, 15). Most important, however, are
the sensory (olfactory) organs at their tips. These organs are found in free knob-like
joints in Galeodes (PL XXIX. fig. 3, PL XXXI. fig. 12), but in Mha.v these joints are
fixed (PL XXIX. fig. 4) ; in section, and often to the naked eye, the lines of fusion in
this latter case are quite visible. The sensory organ itself will be described in detail in
another section (on sensory organs). It is enough here to say that close examination of
it shows that it is not an organ " pour grimper ou s'accrocher " as suggested by Dufour,
and recently again insisted upon, but a sensory, probably olfactory, organ according to
the older view.*
The coxse are provided with hairy processes on their inner faces distally ; these pro-
cesses are immovable (PL XXVII. fig. 14, sj)). In JRliax they are long and cylindrical, in
Galeodes short and pointed. These are almost certainly sensory (tactile) in their functions.
Sensory processes or pads are found at this point on nearly all Arachnids. I have found none in
which they are so limb-like as in Rhax. In the Pseudoscorpionidae alone do they appear, at least in
some genera, to be movably articulated. They have, in these animals, the laminate form which they
have in Scorpio, where they appear to be simply prolongations of the inner faces of the coxae. In the
Pseudoscorpionidte, they perhaps assist in holding prey in front of the beak (lO; cf. fig. 5).
Like the coxae of the other limbs of Galeodes (except the chelicerse), those of the
pedipalps are rigidly fixed to the body. They are firmly cemented to the sides of the
beak (PL XXVIII. fig. 3).
* Lichtenstein & Herbst (48), p. f>2 :— " Der scharfe Geruch, der seinen Sitz hauptsiichlich in dem hoUen Knopf
an der ISpitze der Vorderfiihlor hat, locket sie dahin," et seq. See also the description of the action of the pedipalps
quoted by Murray (57).
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 325
The only other Araclinids with fixed coxal joints to the pedipalps are, I tliink, Theh/phomts and
Schizonotus, and (?) some Pseudoscorpious. In Thelyphonus the beak is enclosed between the enormous
coxal joints of the pedipalps, ■which thus form on their upper and inner sides a sort of channel in which
the beak lies. In Phrymis, we have the coxal joints movable, but the beak as such has aborted in such
a way (PI. XXVIII. fig. 7) that the inner opposite faces of the coxie can meet in the middle line.
In the Spiders, the coxal joints function on each side of the mouth as accessory mouth-parts*.
In the Chernetidse, it is difficult to say for certain whether the coxal joints of the pedipalps are movable,
but their lamellate sensory processes (above described) are certainly, in some cases, movable, and serve
to hold and crush prey in front of the beak. In Scorpio, the coxfe are movable, but do not appear
to be able to close together, owing to the retention of the large labrum between them. These various
arrangements will be referred to again in the section on the alimentary system, inasmuch as they are
different adaptations to the special manner of feeding of the Arachnids.
The Belat'tve Developments of Chelicerce and Pedipaljis. — In the Galeodidse, the cheli-
cerae have certainly been secondarily developed into their present enormous proportions.
In the primitive form, there is no reason to believe that there was any great difference
between the development of the cbelicerae and that of the pedipalps, except, perhaps, in
length ; sections through their basal regions would probably have agreed in size. We can
best explain the conditions in Galeodes by assuming that the chelicerse have greatly
developed, while the pedipalps have retained more nearly their relative importance with
regard to the remaining limbs.
In the Araneffi and the Phalangidfe, the same relations subsist as in Galeodes ; the chelicerfe are
the principal seizing organs, and are correspondingly developed. In those forms, however, iu which the
pedipalps have become the seizing organs, they have, from their greater initial length, more or less
monopolized this function, and have been correspondinglj^ specialized. We have thus a series in which
the pedipalps progressively increase, while the chelicene recede in importance, having henceforth to fulfil
only the quite subordinate function of squeezing juices out of prey already killed or maimed by the
pedipalps. In Schizonotns the pedipalps are in the upright, clawing position, and in this animal and in
the related Thehjphomis the distal joints have formed a simple kind of nipper. In Phrynns no such
pincer is formed at all ; the pedipalps are clawing limbs. In these three we find the pedipalps highly
developed, while the cheliccrae are probably in process of reduction, and tending to flatten out in the
median plane (PI. XXV^III. fig. 9). Lastly, in Scorpio, the pedipalps are enormously developed, the
original clawing action having developed powerful pincers t, while the chelicerse have greatly diminished
in size (PI. XXVILfig. 9 6).
The series of figures 9 a, 9 b, 9 c (PI. XXVII. ), and 9 (PL XXVIII.) represent cross-sections of Galeodes,
Scorpio, Obisium, and Thelyphonus (drawn with camera lucida). The great diminution of the chelicerae
in Scorpio and Thelyphonus is seen to be a secondary specialization. Both Galeodes and Scorpio
depart in opposite directions from the Obisimn type, in which the bases of the limbs are shown of nearly
equal importance in cross-section, such being in all probability the primitive condition.
The great modifications of the anterior segments brought about by the original translocation of the
chelicerae are still further complicated by the development and specialization of the pedipalps as a 2nd
* These are not biting jaws, working within or at the sides of the oral aperture ; such jaws (except, according
to my friend Mr. Michael, in some Acari) are unknown among the Arachnids.
t If the pedipalps of a Scorpion are turned upwards into the sagittal plane, the distal joint will, in closing, be
found to move in a clawing direction, /. t'. towards the body.
326 ME. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
pair of seizing limbs. Sucli limbs must have powerful bases from which to work. The method in which
the bases of the great seizing pedipalps have developed in adaptation to their new requirements varies
greatly in different Arachnids. This fact leaves little doubt that the specialization is a secondary one.
In Schizonotus, the enlarged basal joints of the pedipalps have grown out anteriorly far in front of the
chelicerfe. They, however, still lie ventrally to the cephalic lobes — that is, meet in the middle line. In
the Pseudoscorpionidffi the arrangement differs from that in Schizonotus, in that the coxal joints of the
large pedipalps do not project beyond the front of the body, but posteriorly, thrusting back the four
following or ambulatory limbs, which are pushed further from the mouth than in any other Arachnid
(PI. XXVIII. fig. 2 does not show this so markedly as it is seen in some genera). In Thehjphonus, the
large coxal joints of the pedipalps have found room for development backward, by displacing the 3rd pair
of limbs, the coxal joints of which no longer appear on the ventral surface (PI. XXVII. fig. 17). And
in Phrynus, the enlarged coxee of the pedipalps have partially displaced the coxie of the 3rd pair of limbs,,
though they are still visible from the ventral surface. In both these cases, the comparatively small
chelicerae have sunk in between the coxal joints of the pedipalps. But in all these cases the bases of the
pedipalps meet ventrally in the middle line.
In the Scorpions we reach an extreme of specialization. The basal regions of the enormous pedipalps
are thrust out anteriorly and laterally. The crowding forward of the walking-legs to the anterior end
of the body not only prevents any backward development of the coxae of the pedipalps, but has even
forced them apart so that they no longer meet ventrally in the middle line, nor take any part in the
formation of the ventral surface of the cephalothorax.
These changes in the relative development of the chelicerae and the pedipalps have naturally led to
great modification in the cephalic lobes, which owe their origin to the translocation of the former. In
my preliminary notice of these cephalic lobes, I thought that, as the chelicerae became subordinated to
the pedipalps, the cephalic lobes carrying them became wedged in completely between the shoulders of
the pedipalps, but that is not the case ; the cephalic lobes still form the whole of the anterior dorsal
surface. The relations can be made out by comparing the sections (PL XXVII. figs. 9 a, 9 6, 9 c, and
PI. XXVIII. fig. 9).
Thus, starting with the condition found in Galeodes, the Spiders and Phalaugids, in which the
chelicerae are the only true seizing organs, we have every stage in the gradual specialization of the
originally simple leg-like pedipalps into complicated seizing and crushing limbs.
The oi'd Pair of Limbs. 1st Pew- of Legs. — The 3rd pair of limbs, like the pedipalps,
are leg-like, but have apparently lost their locomotor functions, and are specialized into
a second pair of sensoiy limbs. Like the pedij)alps, they are long in Galeodes, but short
in MJuix. In Galeodes, they are also very thin (PL XXIX. fig. 3). The presence of a
pair of reduced claws at their tips shows that they were at one time ambulatory legs.
Their specialization into feelers in addition to the existing pedipalps must be due to the
great activity of these hunting animals *. The special sensory cells at their tips will be
described in the section on the sensory organs. No other Arachnid has two pairs of feelers.
In the Scorpions, Araneae, Pseudoscorpions, and Phalangidae, the 3rd pair of limbs are true ambulatory
legs, while in the Phryuidae and Thelyphonidae the tendency shown in Galeodes to become sensory
feelers has reached an extreme of specialization. This is doubtless a compensating modification,
owing to the secondary transformation of the pedipalps into seizing organs. In these animals, the first
pair of legs become long, filiform, many-jointed feelers. It is not immediately apparent why, in the
* The auimal kingdom presents other examples of a high development of sensory organs with rapidity of motion
in the pursuit of prey.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.-E. 327
Scorpions and the PscudoscorpionSj in which the pedipalps are seizing organs, the 1st pair of legs have
retained their original loconiotory functions unmodified. The comparatively slow, deliberate manner
of hunting prey may account for the fact that they require no more specialized feelers than the
pedipalps themselves, which are, as everyone who watches them alive knows, highly sensitive.
The Remaining Liinhs. — The i-emaining three pairs of legs are long and powerful, the
last two having the femur divided by an extra joint, as Gaubert (32) has pointed out,
hut whether the reasons he has given for this are correct I am unable to judge, having
never seen the animals alive. The last of the three pairs of legs carries the remarkable
racquet-shaped sensory processes which will he described in detail in the section on the
sensory organs.
General Eemarks on the Cephalothoracic Appendages. — These six pairs of limbs are the appendages of
the first six segments, i. e. of that region of the Araehnidan body which is specialized for locotnotory,
sensory, and predatory functions, while the region immediately following is typically developed into
a nutritive and generative sac, and, as such, loses its limbs. These six pairs of limbs are characteristic
of all adult Arachnids, although the possession of six pairs of appendages on a specialized anterior
region of the body would not constitute an animal an Arachnid. The arrangement of these limbs,
and especially of those nearest the mouth, supplies the most important diagnosis of the class. In
no case does the first pair of limbs form feelers; in no case [? certain specialized Acaridse] do the
limbs form biting jaws projecting into, or arranged close to, a mouth-aperture. In all cases, the first
pair of limbs are jointed, seizing and crushing limbs, transposed from behind to a position in front of
and above the mouth, which is typically a beak. Special feelers are sometimes dispensed with, at other
times developed out of the 2ud, at others out of the 3rd, at others, again, out of the 2nd and 3rd pairs
of limbs; while, in most cases, the 2nd pair of limbs assists the 1st in the capture and crushing of prey,
the juices of which alone are sucked in by a mouth which is typically provided with a straining apparatus.
These characters constitute the Arachnids a class removed entirely from all other Arthropods, in
which, typically, the first pair of limbs are sensory feelers, while a certain number of those which follow
form true jaws, not only to crush food but to push it into the mouth, round which they are ranged.
Certain Acari, in which the mouth-limbs (perhaps fusing with a primitive beak) form a piercing
sucking apparatus, distantly approach, hy secondary specialization, those Arthropods of other groups
(Crustacea and Hexapoda) whose mandibles and maxillae are also secondarily specialized into a sucking
proboscis.
These six pairs of cephalothoracic appendages, constant in the (adult) Arachnida, show certain
interesting variations in their arrangement on the body. These can be gathered at a glance from the
diagrams (PI. XXVII. figs. 15-18 and Pl.XXVlII. figs. 1, 2). None of the arrangements can be con-
sidered primitive. That represented by certain Acari and Arancffi, inasmuch as the sterna are preserved
and the limbs regularly arranged, must be considered as nearest to the original. The circular arrange-
ment in the Spiders is certainly secondary. The regular arrangement of the legs in two straight
series in Galeodes is primitive, but the disappearance of the sterna is a secondary specialization.
Another point of interest is the fixation of the coxa; which occurs to some extent in most Arachnids.
In Galeodes all are fixed, as is also the case in Thehjphonus and the Phalangidae. In Scorpio the coxae
of the first pair of legs are alone movable, those of the other three are fixed. In the Spiders,
Phrynidse, and (?) some Pseudoscorpions all are movable *.
* In fig. 2 (PI. XXVIII.) the coxk certainly appear to be fixed ; hut there is great variation in the arrangements
of the coxai in this order.
328 - MR. H. M. BEEXAED ON THE
Takino- the limbs as a wholCj the variations are considerable, and no single Arachnid can claim to have
retained the primitive conditions. It seems only possible to deduce them separately from a primitive
ancestral form in which the limbs were evenly developed and evenly arranged along the two sides of the
body, separated by a median row of sternal plates, as shown in the diagram (PI. XXIX. fig. 14).
The character of the limbs, suggested in this diagram and in figure 5, PI. XXIX., is not unlike that of
the ambulatory limbs of the Silurian Scorpion Paheophonus (PI. XXVII. fig. 10), whose semiaquatic,
i. e. littoral, existence makes its retention of the primitive type of ambulatory leg not improbable.
Vestiges of Abdominal Appendages. — CareM study of the ventral surfaces of Galeodiclae
has led me to the conclusion that the " sterna " along the ahdominal segments
represent rudimentary limbs which have simply flattened down.
Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, PL XXIX., show a continuous series of plate-like structures
on the abdominal segments bearing all the characters of vestigial appendages. That
these are the vestiges of limbs which formed at one time a continuous series with those
on the cephalothorax we gather from the following facts : —
(a) Fig. 7, PI. XXIX., shows a chitinous fold across the genital operculum, repeating
the interarticular fold of the preceding appendage (<?/, diagram, PI. XXIX. fig. 11).
(5) The genital opercula are generally admitted to be vestigial appendages. The two
pairs of stigmatic opercula repeat the genital opercula so closely that they must also be
vestigial appendages. These are followed by a series of six plates, the first three of
wliich may at once be claimed as vestiges, inasmuch as six pairs of limbs are almost
universally admitted to have been present on the abdomen of Arachnids. But we
have here in all nine pairs of plates obviously forming a homonomous series. If the
first sis of these are vestiges of limbs, we may safely conclude that the last three are so
likewise (compare especially figs. 8, 9, 10, where the plates repeat exactly the stigmatic
opercula).
(c) These vestiges are often covered with hair diff'ering entirely from the hair on the
rest of the abdomen, but repeating exactly the character of the hair on the coxse of the
cephalothoracic limbs.
{d) The same is the case with colour. These vestiges often differ very markedly in
colour from the rest of the abdomen, and from the terga, but repeat exactly the colour
and general appearance of the coxse of the cephalothoracic limbs.
[e) These vestiges meet in the middle line like the coxce of the cephalothoracic limbs,
while internally the dorso-ventral muscles, which in other Arachnids (e. g. Scorpio) are
attached just inside the areas which admittedly represent vestiges of the limbs associated
with the lung-books, in Galeodes meet in the middle line.
(/) The stigmatic apertures, which are always associated with rudimentary limbs,
have also moved into the ventral middle line.
These arguments and figures leave, I think, little doubt that there were once at least
nine pairs of limbs on the abdomen of Galeodes, but none of the vestiges any longer
appear as limbs. The genital and stigmatic opercula are now nothing more than folds,
while the following vestiges are flattened completely down and look like sternal plates.
On the posterior edges of the stigmatic opercula in the genus Galeodes, a row of short
stout spines occurs, the paired origin of which is obvious (PL XXIX. fig. 10). These
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODIDiE. 329
are the stigmatic combs. A less specialized group of setse appeal* iu nearly the same spot
on segment 5 of the same figure, and singular modifications, presumably of these rows of
setai, occur iu the specimen of G. intrepidus on the 5th, 6th, and 7th segments, also
figured (PI. XXIX. fig. 8).
Lastly, the hypothetical restitution of the abdominal limbs at an earlier stage in their
degeneration, shown in PL XXIX. fig. 11 (which will be discussed further in the section
on the tracheae), suggests that the sclerite su.rrounding the anus may also be a fused
pair of limb-vestiges.
Abdominal limbs in Arachnids are well known in the mammillse of the Spiders, iu the pectines of
the Scorpions, and in the "penis" of Phryims (77). Further, from the presence of the lung-books,
vestiges of limbs can be safely recognized in the areas covei'iug these breathing-organs.
Until a comparatively recent time, the traces of abdominal limbs were thought to be confined entirely
to the first six abdominal segments ; in Scorpio we have the genital opercula, the pectines, and four pairs
of lung-books. But I claim to have found clear traces of the former presence of tracheal invaginations,
and therefore of limbs, on all the abdominal segments of certain Cheruetids (10) and on eight segments
of Thebjphonus (15).
These facts fully agree with what we have just seen of Galeodes, where fairly clear vestiges of at least
nine pairs occur.
While, then, Scorpio * and the Spiders show traces of only six pairs of limbs having been
present on the abdomen, three Arachnids, belonging to very different families, bear testimony to more
than six. Thelyphonus shows traces of 8 pairs, Galeodes of 9, and Chernes of 10. We may therefore
conclude, what indeed we might have safely concluded on almost any theory as to the origin of the
Arachnids except one, that the primitive form had limbs on all the abdominal segments. The only
theory according to which the abdominal limbs could not have existed in the posterior segments will be
discussed in detail in the last section.
We have further some evidence as to the original character of these limbs, which are now, in the
Galeodidse, reduced entirely to plate-like structures. In some Phrynidae the first pair still persists in the
so-called "penis" (77, and PI. XXIX. fig. 13) as a pair of jointed limbs folded together iu the middle line
and illustrating the formation of the genital operculum. In the Phalangid;e, the long penis or ovipositor
is almost certainly a specialization of a pair of filamentous appendages. In Scorpio, the limbs of the
2ud segment, the pectines, are filamentous and still bear traces of three joints ; we learn from this that
the plates covering the stigmata were once filamentous and jointed limbs. This gives us a series of such
filamentous appendages as far as the 6th segment in Scorpio and as far as the 8th in Thelyphonus. That
such filamentous limbs did exist on the 4th and 5th segments we have direct evidence, viz. their
persistence as mammillse iu the Spiders, which are especially leg-like in the Aviculariidse.
As a rule, then, the vestiges of the abdominal limbs in Arachnids are now little more than plates or
folds, covering the genital and stigmatic apertures, or else are flattened down as hardly distinguishable
portions of the ventral segmental sclerites. In a few cases, however, the original leg-like character has
not been completely obliterated, these cases occurring in very distinct families and on diflerent seo-ments
always in adaptation to the specialization which characterizes these families.
* I have often thought that the tail-sting of Scorpio was a composite structure, representing a pair of Ics (of
the anal segment) fused posteriorly over the anus. Limbs meeting over the anus and pointing backward
are found in Scolopendra. Such an origin would explain the remarkable fact that the poison-glands are oaired.
Of. further, the anal plates of Galeodes, and the diagrams, PI. XXIX. figs. 8-12, 14.
SECOKD SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 44
530 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
Apart, then, from any special theory as to the origin of the Arachnida, the evidence tends to show that
the primitive form had appendages which were leg-like, and serial with those of the cephalothorax, on
every segment of the abdomen.
IV. The Cuticle and its Derivatives, and the Htpodermis.
The Chitinous Cuticle. — The cuticle of Galeodes is very highly developed, and shows
many variations in adaptation to the needs of the different regions of the body. As a
rule, it is very thick and rigid in the anterior regions of the body, but soft and flexible on
the abdomen, with distinct but not very thick terga and " sterna."
In this last point Galeodes comes halfway between the Spiders (with no terga * or sterna) and the
Scorpions, Pedipalpi, and Pseudoscorpions, which have well-developed sclerites on the abdomen, con-
tinuing dorsally the cephalothracic shield and ventrally the vestiges of sternites persisting between the
■coxae of the limbs.
The cuticle has the characteristic structure of the chitinous cuticle as found among
Arachnids, but it presents pecuJiarities which are of interest. Taking first a thick solid
portion (PI. XXIX. figs. 15 and 17), we have an outermost highly refractive pale yellow or
glassy layer (g), the colour of which deepens to bright red-brown when especially thickened,
as at the hinges, around the bases of hairs and spines, in the spines, in the jaws and
their teeth, &c. No structure can be made oiit in the outermost part of this layer ; its
inner part, however, can be seen to be finely striated, as if perforated by innumerable
fine canals which taper away into it. "Wlien, as in especially hard parts of the cuticle, this
layer is very thick, these canals show as a tangled mass of lines (fig. 17). This hard
refractive layer forms a continuous covering over the whole body, supplying the outer
coating of all the spines and hairs, and the innermost lining of the tracheae (PI. XXX.
figs. Via 8c lib).
Pollowing this layer, and, as a rule, fairly distinct fi*om it, occurs a varying number
(often 30-40) of principal layers of whitish and comparatively soft chitin. They look as
if they gradually increased in hardness and refractiveness as they approach the outermost
layer, while the innermost layers often take slight stain. These are sometimes called the
chitinogenous layers. A high power seems to show that these principal layers are made
up of an enormous number of fine laminfe. They are traversed by innumerable canals
containing protoplasmic processes which sometimes stain deeply. Tliese canals seem to
end distally in the hard refractive outermost layer. The fine canals above described in
the glassy layer are in all probability the distal ends of the canals in the thick softer
layers. These " chitinogenous " layers can be followed into the hairs and spines, and
into the tracheae, where they form the solid hoops characteristic of these latter organs
(PI. XXX. fig.'j7 b).
Both these layers ai'e modified in order to form the lens of the eye. The outermost
refractive layer appears to split up into a multitude of deeply staining layers, with
one (the outermost) extremely thin glassy membrane. The inner layers become
* Except in LlpMsthis, cf. Pocock (59).
COMPARATIVE MOEPBOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 331
suddenly thickened, without, however, breaking their continuity {cf. PI. XXXI. fig. 7).
A similar sudden thickening of the chitinogenous strata forms the crenulations of the
tracheal tubes (PI. XXX. tig. 111).
Myjjodermis. — The cells secreting these layers of chitin are not always demonstrable ;
in some places, especially w here the innermost layers take stain, they appear to be embedded
in the cliitin which they are secreting. At other places, especially where the cuticle is
very thick, the hypodermis-cells are very regular and distinct, Avith large staining nuclei.
They are sometimes cylindrical and rest on a basal membrane running parallel with
the cuticle (PI. XXX. fig. 4) ; at others they are plate-like, and so closely applied to the
chitin that they are seen only in well-stained preparations. In this latter case staining
processes from the cells run at riglit angles through the chitin, and in cases where (in
sections) the hypodermis has parted from the chitinous layers, these processes break ofi,
are left in the chitinous layers, and are seen in small groups of deeply stauiing points
(PL XXIX. fig. 15). The concentrated grouping and staining of these points suggest that
the processes tliemselves came from the nuclei. The fact that in those cases where the
cells are not demonstrable they are probably altogether, both cytoplasm and the nucleus,
embedded in the chitin, shows that there is nothing improbable in. the nuclei sending
processes into the cuticle in the cases in question.
Migration of Pigment-cells into the Cuticle. — The incorporation of other matter into the
cuticle is clearly seen in Galeodes. In almost all parts, streams of black dots may be seen
running up the traversing canals (PL XXIX. tig. 17). These may be pigment-granules.
No doubt, indeed, exists as to the wandering of pigment-cells into the cuticle at certain
definite places, e. (j. in the pedipalps. An enormous number of dark green pigment masses
are formed in the distal portions of these limbs, and they find thek way to the chitin either
of the outer cuticle or of the tendons and the tracheae. Among the tissues they are either
small round bodies, or grouped to form long, straggling, tangled syncytia. On reaching
the cuticle, they become fusiform and applied lengthwise to the chitin, through which
they ascend by sending processes into it. These processes tend to spread out between the
principal layers of the chitin (PL XXIX. fig. 16; cf. also PL XXVIII. fig. G). In this
way, the whole of the fusiform body may come to lie within the cuticle, between its separate
layers. I know nothing more of its fate, either here or on the tendons or ti-achete. The
gravitation of these cells towards the chitin is of itself interesting. It is not easy to
avoid suggesting that the cells are collecting and removing waste matter from the ends
of these long limbs, where they are most plentiful and where the circulation is probably
sluggish.
Takiug the cuticle of an adult Lycosa for compansoa, the chief point noticed was that it was
much more brittle than that of Galeodes. Microscopic examination shows that a greater number of
the chitin layers are hard and refractive tlian in Galeodes. I have counted ten distinct hard red-brown
layers, whereas the softer white chitin layers so numerous in Galeodes arc comparatively few. It is thus
very difficult to get sections of this Spider. It is possible that this increase in the hardness of the
whole cuticle permits of its being thin and therefore lighter in adaptation to the semi-aerial life on webs
characteristic of the Spiders (though this would not apply to Lycosa).
The cuticle of Scorpio {Euscorpio) is characterized by the specialization of a very clear glassy layer of
44*
332 ■ ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
varying thickness as its outer layer, beneath which follow several layers of hard, red-brown, highly
refractive chitiu (PI. XXX. fig. 1 h). These, again, are followed immediately by a varying but generally
considerable thickness of staining chitin, between the laminae of which pigment is found deposited.
The staining layers are found to be traversed by fine canals. This cuticle, like that of Galeodes, cuts
much more easily than does that of Lycosa ; though it is much thicker, it is much less brittle.
Where the cuticle is thin and flexible, as on the abdomen, we naturally find a striking
change in the arrangement of the layers. The outermost hard refractive layer is thrown
into minute transversely arranged folds (PI. XXX. fig. 6) in all parts wherever the skin is
required to bend, i. e. at the sides of the body and between the consecutive tergites and
" sternites." Over these latter it lies flat.
Immediately under this folded refractive layer, a great number of very thin staining
layers occur which appear to be thrown into irregular wavy folds, and do not in any way
repeat the regular folding of the refractive layer as seen iu section. Pigment masses are
occasionally found deposited between these staining layers. I have not discovered the
origin of these pigment masses ; as a rule, the pigment of the dorsal surface is seen
within the hyj)odermis-cells.
This folding of the outermost layer seems to be universal over the abdomen of the Spiders, which
Lave generally lost the smooth, non-flexible tergites and sternites. The curious ridging of the flexible
cuticle in the Spiders has been much discussed, and the ridges have been thought to be thicknesses of
skin rather than folds [Wagner, 74). It seems, to judge by Galeodes, that both statements are true;
the skin itself is not folded but simply regularly thickened by foldings of its outermost refractive layer,
these folds not being repeated by the subjacent layers (PI. XXX. fig. 3).
These subjacent staining layers pi-esent a I'emarkable feature. The usual lamination parallel to the
surface of the skin is obliterated for a certain depth under the outermost refractive layer by an immense
number of fine canals which open through pores in the outermost layer. The apertures of these pores
appear to lie in the troughs formed by the ridges ; the surface view of these pores has already been
figured and described by Wagner. Tliis marked porosity of the cuticle in the abdomen of the Araneids,
which may be a specialization of the canal system described in the cuticle of Galeodes, may perhaps be
brought into relation with the loss of the excretory functions of the Malpighian vessels, which appear
to have become specialized for the removal of the faeces from the mid-gut diverticula (n). It is also
probably a protective adaptation to render distasteful their otherwise attractive sac-like abdomens filled
to distension with rich food.
Beneath this porous layer there are to be found a few layers of staining chitin, probably permeated by
the hypodermis cells.
These remarkable lines and ridges on the cuticle of the whole abdomen of Spiders are found also on
all soft-bodied Mites. This is perhaps a further point of connection between the Acari and the
Araneai, such striation occurring, so far as I know, in no other Arachnids (6).
So far as I can ascertain, it is the outermost refractive layer of chitin which, by being thrown into
ridges and folds and conical processes, cause the remarkable sculpturing of the cuticle of the Phalangida,
the lower layers taking no definite part in it.
Scorpio [Eiiscorpio) has no ridged and furrowed cuticle, such as Galeodes, Spiders, and Acarids.
The flexible membranes at the sides of the body between the terga and sterna are thrown into irregular
folds covered by the glassy layer arranged as shown in PI. XXX. fig. 2. This white and highly refractive
outermost layer shows no lamination, but is apparently traversed, at least for some distance, by canals.
The inner chitinogenous layers stain deeply, but take no part in the formation of the papilla- like folds {?)
of the glassy layer.
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOCxT OF THE GALEODID^. 333
In the Pseiuloscorpions, the soft lateral membranes evidently vary, some having the outermost
refractive layer thrown up into papilla, others into irregular (?) longitudinal foldings.
Set(B and Spines. — The Galeoclidse are remarkable for their rich covering of seta?,
i^pines, &c. These attain their greatest develoi^raent, as a rule, on the limbs. Com-
mencing with the short stunted spine standing up from the hollow of a ring of thick red-
brown chitin and itself bright red-brown (PI. XXX. fig. 8), we have short stiff setEe with
blunt, slightly forked ends *, and thin flexible setse tapering finely to a point, and often
attaining an extraordinary length (PI. XXIX. fig. 3), club-shaped setse, &c. Most of the
seta3 show a disposition to form regular rings which, when further developed, might lead
to the feathering which cliaracterizes certain setiB on the chelicerje and beak. The
setae, as such, require a careful study, in order to ascertain their special physiological
significance.
The attachment of the seta? to the cuticle is apparently uniform ; I could find no difference
between the method in which the spines and the finer seta? were fixed in the cuticle. Ail
alike are suspended by the outermost hard or glassy layer, which runs over tliem as an
outer covering. The figures (PL XXX. figs. 4-8) will explain what I mean by " suspended."
The setse rise from the bases of hard cbitinous craters, there being no break in the continuity
of the outer refractive layer t- On the other hand, the inner softer cbitinous layers are
not continuous -^vith the inner lining of the setfe, but the two are connected by numberless
fine radiating fibres (;/.) which, like all flexible chitin, take stain, while the layers which
they connect often I'emain unstained. These radiating fibres either bring about by their
active contraction, or else restrain by their elasticity, the play of the seta. Radiating from
the extreme butt-end of the seta to the walls of the chamber, they completely divide it into
an upper and lower portion. In the long sensory setae on the limbs the upper chamber
communicates with the cavity of the body by a separate channel {cf. c on PI. XXX,
fig. 7«; PI. XXXII. figs. 13, 11).
In order to make room for the play of the butt-end of the seta, the channel throuo-li
the cuticle is enlarged in various ways. Where the cuticle is thick, the setal pore widens
out suddenly, the staining fibres radiating from the shelf thus formed, the widened area
being lined by a layer of hard refractive chitin (PI. XXX. fig. 1). When the cuticle
is thin, the hard refractive chitin forms a sort of globular chamber into which the base of
the seta is suspended in the usual way, the chamber being often much deeper than the
surrounding cuticle (fig. 5). The strong chambers prevent the sera from being foi'ced
back into the tissues of the animal. There is a further precaution against the same
danger in the case of the sjnnes, inasmuch as they widen out, spear-head-shaped, above
the ramparts surrounding their bases (fig. 8).
The setae at the tip of the labrum are specially modified. They are joined by short
trabeculse so as to form a stiff' rectangular lattice-work (PL XXVIII. fig. 6). They form
tw'o series arranged on each side of the mouth and running dorso-ventrally. As the tijis of
tlie setae are feathered and the barbs interlace, the arrangement forms a sieve to prevent
* In ' Nature ' (vol. xlvi. p. 223, 1892) I compared these to buttoned rapiers.
t Wagner's account of the connection between the setas and the cuticle in Spiders (74) differs from this.
334) • ME, H. M. BERNAED ON THE
anything but the juices of the prey from entering the alimentary canal. On the sieves
in and around the mouths of Arachnids, cf. the section on the alimentary system.
The flagellum is also clearly a modified bristle ; its position and form in G. arabs
are shown in PI. XXVIT. tig. 11/
The only otlier Arachuids which can compare with Galcodes in hairiness are tlie Araneae, especially
the Aviculariidse. This is very interesting in view o£ the other features, which appear to be primitive,
common to the two. I have found no difference in the principle of suspending the setae and spines of
Lycosa. The hard chitinous chambers in which the bases of the larger setse are suspended in the softer
abdominal region are very much more powerful than in Galeodes, and the chitin is dark red-brown. A
comparison of the setse themselves would lead us too much into details, of great biological interest, but
not of sufficient morphological importance to claim attention here.
Of the remaining Arachnids, none are specially remarkable for hairiness ; on the contrary, the
Scorpions, Pedipalpi, and Pseudoscorpious are very free from setse. Many Acari, e. g. Trombidium,
however, have very specialized setse, and the same is the case with others, at least in their larval stages
{Michael, 56).
I am inclined to think that the hairy condition was primitive, and that it has been secondarily lost in,
certain families in adaptation to special conditions of life. There is hardly any Arachnid which has not
retained patches of dense setse in some regions of the body, especially around the mouth. Further, there
can, I think, be little doubt that the Scorpions have secondarily lost a hairy covering which has, however,
left clear traces of its former presence. If a small Scorpion be cleared in cedar oil or glycerine, its
cuticle will be seen to be traversed by enormous numbers of large pores. In section, these pores are
found not to open at the exterior ; they are, in fact, canals through the so-called cbitinogenous layers,,
which stop short at the bard outer glassy layer (PI. XXX. fig. 1). When we remember that the outer-
most layer passes continuously over the bristles, it is obvious that on the gradual degeneration and final
disappearance of a bristle we should obtain the structure just mentioned, the last part to disappear being
naturally the canal through the cbitinogenous layer.
Perhaps as good a demonstration as can be given that these pores through the cbitinogenous layers
were once setal pores is furnished by the pedipalps of Phrynus. In this animal, the pedipalp, in a
marked contrast to that of the Spiders, is almost hairless. But the cuticle is channelled through by
countless pores. There are, further, longitudinal rows of tubercular elevations of the cuticle, raising
small groups (2, 3, or 4) of these channels, like so many irregular fingers pointing in all directions. All
doubt that these pores are really setal pores is dispelled by finding an occasional fine seta rising out of
one of them, generally from the slope or just below the summit of a tubercle. These setaj are fine
cuticular processes with the characteristic structure.
The setal pore would, no doubt, itself also disappear in time imless it could be utilized for other
purposes. I should like to suggest that these canals containing protoplasmic ijrocesses from the hypo-
dermis which runs up as far as to the outer hard layer may now be sensory organs, perhaps for the
appreciation of changes of temperature.
Again, the so-called lyriform organs may be setal pores modified after the degeneration of the original
setae (see further on this, p. 355) .
The claws are somewhat remarkable, owing to the fact that their tips articulate wdth
the shafts. A long tendon acts as flexor to this movable tip, I have found no extensor.
The claws on the first pair of legs, w hick act as a second pair of palps, though small
and not jointed, are protiusible and are moved by powerful tendons (PI. XXXII.
fig. 10).
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 335
Tendons. — The development of long tendons for the movement of the limbs is especially noteworthy in
Arachnids. Galeodes is no exception in this respect. These tendons appear in some cases to be
closed cuticular invaginations. They can often be seen to be hollow. They further attract the small
pigment-bodies already alluded to. The long distal tendons may be adaptations in the interest of strength,
by permitting the muscle-masses to be situated in the larger proximal joints, where they can develop to
greater size than would be possible in the smaller distal joints. The short tendons on the proximal
joints specialize the actions of the muscles in accordance with the highly developed locomotory powers
of so many of the Arachnids.
V. The Mtjsculae, System.
The division of the body into two specialized regions, the anterior for locomotion, the
posterior for digestion and reproduction, has naturally led to great modification in the
dermo-muscular tube, which may be assumed to have been the primitive arrangement in
all articulate animals. Nevertheless, we can still refer many of the muscles of Galeodes
to the elements of a typical Annelidan musculature. We have, for instance, both
circular dermal muscles and longitudinal dermal muscles and a series of segmentally-
arranijed dorso-ventral muscles.
The Muscles of the Body : the Circtilar Musculature. — In the cephalothorax, the muscles
which most obviously belong under this heading are the skin-muscles at the sides of the
body, where the cuticle is soft and flexible, just above the bases of the anterior limbs, at
the sides beneath the so-called " head " (PI. XXVII. fig. 2). The distal end of the coxal
gland passes among these muscles, and is then very diflicult to follow. These muscles
probably bring about a certain amount of movement of the " head.''
As might be expected, it is in the abdomen, where the cylindrical segments are least
•diflferentiated, that the circular muscles are retained over considerable areas. The lateral
flexible membrane on each side of the body is lined by a layer of circular fibres.
Anteriorly, these fibres form only a single layer; postei'iorly, however, the layers gradually
thicken. The increase in the development of the circular muscles towards the posterior
end of the abdomen is correlated with a corresponding diminvition in development in
the longitudinal muscles (cf. PL XXX. figs. 11, 15). These abdominal circular fibres
show at times only a longitudinal striation, at others a transverse striation also ;
they are capable of enormous extension when the abdomen is distended after a
meal.
These circular muscles are found under the flexible lateral membranes in Scorpio and the Pedipalpi,
and both in the cephalothorax and abdomen of the Pseudoscorpions. They are also present in the
abdomen of Spiders {Li/cosa), where Ihcy seem to be evenly developed under the cuticle.
The Longitudinal Muscles. — These are also well developed in Galeodes. Dorsally,
they rim in two strong bands on each side of the median line from the tergum of
the 3rd segment, part of which lies under the posterior end of the cephalic lobes, to the
diaphragm, and then along the abdomen, on each side of the heart, gradually diminishing
in development towards the stercoral pocket, where the circular muscles correspondingly
336 MR. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
increase in development (PL XXX. fig. 15). These muscles are very powerful in the
anterior abdominal segments, and here belong clearly to a system of muscles which
raises the whole abdomen at right angles to the ground ; this, according to Walter (75),
being an attitude of defence commonly assumed. It is worth noting that Galeodes can
bend the body not only at the waist but also between the 4th and 5th segments. The
Galeodidee have thus retained more of the original play of the segments upon each
other than any other Arachnid, no other being able to bend the cephalothoracic region.
The raising of the abdomen seems to be common to the larger Arachnida, and in Scorpio
it has been retained and specialized in connection with the " sting."
The ventral longitudinal muscles are more specialized than are the dorsal, and anteriorly
are not always easy to recognize as such. Commencing in the soft skin at the side between
the cephalic lobes and the coxte of the pedipalps and first legs, a band runs backward
on each side to be attached to the transverse fold behind the stigmata (PI. XXX. fig. 9).
Prom here bands run backward to the next transverse fold and on to the diaphragm.
The bands here, both in front of and immediately behind the diaphragm, are very broad
and powerful, and apparently counteract the elevators of the abdomen. In the 1st
abdominal segment they seem to be continued up the sides of the body (fig. 11) *.
In the 2nd segment they take up a more ventral position, almost meeting in the middle
line in the 4th segment, from which point they again widen out until in the anal segment
they appear to end in the dilators of the anal aperture {G. arabs).
Longitudinal muscles occur in other Arachnids more or less modified. They are perhaps most highly
developed in the abdomen of Scorpio^ owing to the specialization oi' the posterior segments into a tail
armed with a stinging-apparatus. This abdomen and tail, as is well known, can (like the abdomen of
Galeodes) be raised in the median plane. In Spiders the dorsal muscle-bands are probably atrophied ;
the ventral longitudinal muscles, however, stretch I'ight across the posterior portion of the abdomen,
at least in young specimens, while anteriorly they taper into bands on each side of the genital
aperture (74). Dorsal and ventral longitudinal muscles are also demonstrable in the Pseudoscorpious
and Acari.
All these abdominal longitudinal muscle-bands consist of transversely-striped fibres, although, like the
circular fibres, they must be capable of enormous stretching, i. e. wlieu the abdomen is distended. They
serve, no doubt, to re-telescope the segments (c/. contracted and distended abdomens, PI. XXIX.
figs. 8&9).
Dorso-ventral Muscles of the Cephalothorax. — These, which are morphologically almost
more interesting than the dermal muscles, are found well developed in Galeodes.
In the cephalothorax there is a system of five pairs of dorso-ventral muscles belonging
to segments 4, 5, and 6. These slope and cross each other, running even from one
segment into the next.
The general arrangement of tliese muscles can be gathered from PI. XXX. fig. 9, which
was reconstructed from a series of sections and is therefore diagrammatic. Hardly any
attempt is made to indicate their relative strengths. It is highly probable that some of
* Birvda (23) states that normally they are attached to the area in front of the chitinous ridges on the genital
opercula (PI. XXIX. fig. 7). This quite confirms my assumption that these ridges are primitive iuterarticular
membranes, as shown in fig. 11.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 337
these are true dorso-veutral muscles much modified and shifted in adaptation to the
special movements required. For instance, none of theiu meet ventrally in the middle
line as the undoubted dorso-veutral muscles of the abdomen do, and as these ought to do^
owing to the approximation of the coxa) in the middle line. All these muscles are situated
more or less laterally ; hence it is also possible that some of them may be adaptations of
circular muscles. The point requires to be specially worked out. The general action of
these muscles can be gathered from the figure.
The relations between these dorso-ventral muscles and the alimentary canal will be discussed in the
section on the latter sj'stem. We may, however, mention that this inter-relation teaches us that the
four pairs of alimentary diverticula in the cephalothorax, which are characteristic of Arachnids, indicate
the former presence of at least four pairs of dorso-ventral muscles in the cephalothorax, running in the
dividing planes between the last four segments. Whether any, and, if so, which of the five pairs of
dorso-ventral muscles in the posterior ccphalothoracic segments of Guleodes answer to the hypothetical
four, it is now difEcult, if not impossible, to ascertain. The last, inasmuch as it runs behind the last
cephalothoracic diverticulum instead of in front of it, probably belonged to the constriction which formed
the diaphragm.
In Scorpio only one pair is retained, viz. that in the last cephalothoracic segment ; it runs down in
front of, but not in contact with, the diaphragm, and is attached to the endosternite. This agaiu
probably belonged originally to the intersegmental constriction which formed the diaphragm.
In Phrynus, Thelyphonus, and the Aranece four pairs of dorso-ventral muscles have been retained more
or less modified as the dorsal attachments of the endosternite, and are now largely fibrous ; they suspend
the endosternite, on which the alimentary canal rests, and separate the alimentary diverticula in the
typical manner. If the endosternite of Guleodes were attached by fibres to the dorsal wall, these would
apparently represent the dorso-ventral muscles of the constriction behind the 3rd and 4th segments. I
find in my dissecting-notes that there is such a fibrous attachment, but I unfortunately did not record
the exact position.
In the Spiders the powerful muscles from the dorsal wall to tiie sucking-stomach are probably not
adaptations of dorso-ventral muscles, but to be derived from the original oesophageal or pharyngeal
muscles which are now variously developed, i.e. according to the position of the sucking- apparatus in
relation to the nerve-mass (on the position of the sucking-stomach in Spiders, cf. the section on the
alimentary canal).
In the Psudoscorpions there is one pair behind which the 1st alimentary diverticulum expands. It
therefore apparently belonged originally to the constriction between the 2nd and 3rd segments.
The diifcrent ways in which these cephalothoracic dorso-ventral muscles have been retained is quite
in keeping with the various methods of longitudinal compression which the cephalothorax has undergone
{cf. the various developments of the diverticula in the alimentary canal).
In the Scorpions, Pscudoscorpions, and Thelyphonidse, muscles descend from the anterior dorsal surface
near the median line to the labrum. These are, apparently, the original longitudinal muscles running
to the labrum, which now run dorso-ventrally owing to the present depressed position of the labrum.
Dorso-ventnd 3Iuscles in the Abdomen. — There are six pairs of dorso-ventral muscles
in the abdomen of Galeodes belonging originally to the constrictions between the first
seven segments (PI. XXX. fig. 9). The majority of them seem now to have two
points of attachment, viz. partly to the segmental constrictions — the primitive arrange-
ment— and partly to the middle of the segments, which is a specialization found in
many otlier Arachnids. Dorsally, these muscles are inserted on each side of the heart
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 45
338 ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
at no oreat distance from eacli other ; ventrally, they are inserted in the median line,
Those descending between the stigmata draw up the fold between the opercula, and
thus, by bringing the inner edges of these latter closer together in the median line, help
to close the stigmata (in PI. XXX. fig. 16 these muscles are attached to the ridge m.
but anteriorly to the plane of the section). This medio-ventral insertion of the dorso-
ventral muscles has been already Correlated with the approximation of the coxae in the
middle line.
The last two pairs of dorso-ventral muscles are in contact for a short distance in the
middle of their course (PL XXX. figs. 9, 14).
The chief function of these muscles can hardly fail to be associated with the contents
of the abdomen. They serve to compress and hold it together, especially when greatly
distended by large quantities of liquid food pumped into the alimentary diverticula.
Their relations to the abdominal diverticula will be referred to in the section on the
alimentary canal.
Taking the cephalotlioracic with the abdominal dorso-ventral muscles, w^e have in
Galeodes traces of a series from the constriction between the 3rd and 4th segments to
that between the 6th and 7th abdominal segments, in all ten pairs.
These dorso-ventral muscles are a marked feature in the abdomens of Arachnids. They are apparently
least developed in the Spiders, in which animals the abdominal sac is very highly specialized. Wasmanu
(74 a) figures four pairs in the abdomen of Mygale. Schimkevitch (62) describes three pairs for Epeira.
In Scorpio there are in the abdomen seven pairs of powerful muscles attached either wholly or chiefly
to the flat surfaces of the plate-like tergites and steniites. Dorsally they are, as in Galeodes, attached
on each side of the heart ; while ventrally, instead of meeting in the middle line, they diverge widely so
as to be attached on each side at the inner edges of the limb-areas (PI. XXVII. fig. 16, la). The first
of these dorso-ventral muscles in the abdomen of Scorpio, corresponding with the pair which in Galeodes
run down to the fold between the genital opercula (PI. XXX. fig. 9), have become attached to the
endosternite through the diaphragm ; this has been brought about by the forward thrust of the genital
aperture between the cosje of the legs, right under the endosternite.
In the Pseudoscorpions there are also seven pairs of dorso-ventral muscles in the abdomen attached,
as in Scorpio, to the flat surfaces of the sternites and tergites. In these cases, judging from Galeodes,
each pair of such muscles originally belonged to the intersegmental constriction next behind it.
In Phrynus there appear also to be seven pairs of dorso-ventral muscles, while in Thehjphonus there
are apparently eio-ht pairs. In both cases, as well as in Scorpio, the muscles are attached ventrally in
two rows with a row of sterna between them, close to the inner edges of the limb-areas [cf. PI. XXVII.
fio-s. 16 17, 18, /a). lu Tlielyphonus there are therefore in all twelve pairs of dorso-ventral muscles,
four in the cephalothorax and eight in the abdomen.
We thus have, in all, traces of twelve pairs (or thirteen, if those in the cephalothorax of the Pseudo-
scorpions are rightly honiologized) of these very primitive muscles in the Arachnids, Thehjphonus having
retained the Teatest number. This is important; it shows that Thelyphonus, with its tail of three
seo-ments, is less specialized than Scorpio, with its tail of five segments. In the ancestral form the 8th
abdominal segment was not specialized into a tail-segment.
The connection between these dorso-ventral muscles and the alimentary diverticula will be discussed
in the section dealing with the latter system.
The "Feiw-pericardial" Iluscles. — These, which form a series characteristic of the
Arachnids, are entirely absent in Galeodes. They will be described in the section on the
respiration, and the reason of their absence in Galeodes wall be discussed.
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODlDJi:. 33&
Special Ilusculaiure of the Limbs. — This need not be described in detail ; we may-
confine ourselves to certain points of special intei-est.
The muscles moving the chelicerse on the body are entirely confined to the ceplialic
lobes ; the significance of this has already been pointed out [of. supra p. 309 and
PI. XXX. fig. 9, where the shaded portion represents this musculature).
The muscles moving the other limbs on the body are not numerous, owing to the
fixation of the coxse, within which the chief muscles for moving the limbs upon the coxse
lie. Nevertheless, certain muscles, especially those for elevating the limbs, run from the
body-walls or from the endosternite and help to move the trochanter and (?) femur.
These cannot here be described in detail ; one muscle, however, deserves attention.
A large muscle (PL XXX. fig. 10, ep) runs from the inner and vipper surface of the
endosternite on each side to raise the pedipalps. This muscle is of great length and
its fibres are very thick. The endosternite is an infolding between the 3rd and 4th
segments, whereas this elevator of the pedipalp should be attached to an infolding Ijetweea
the 2nd and 3rd *, as it apjjareutly is in the Spiders. This first pair of apodemes of the
endosteruite of the Spiders is now presumably represented in Galeodes only by a pair
of small fibrous plates fastened by bands to the endosternite (p. 320). The elevator of
the pedipalps might at one time have been attached to these plates and have shifted
secondarily in coui-se of time on to the second pair of apodemes, /. e. on to the endo-
sternite, the great expansion of which sujiplies a large surface of attachment.
The other limb-muscles coming Ironi the endosternite run into the 3rd and ith limits,
as they miglit be expected to do from the nature of the endosternite as an infoldino-
between the 3rd and 4th segments (PI. XXX. fig. 10).
The limb-muscles of other Arachnids cannot here be discussed ; great differences naturally prevail,
owing chiefly to the ditierent arrangements of the cox;e. In the Arachnids with movable cox», e. g.
Spiders, all the body limb-muscles are attached to tliese coxae, while the limb-muscles proper (i. e. of
the proximal joints) lie in the coxse. In other Arachnids again, e. g. Phri/nus, the posterior faces of
the movable coxa are prolonged as stout sclerites into the body and attached by muscles. But it is
impossible here to go into details ; the various developments of the endosternite alone would make any
close comparison difficult and complicated.
The Muscles of the Alimentary Canal. — The anterior portion of the chitin-Hned
oesophagus is converted into a sucking-apparatus, which is expanded by a very powerful
array of muscles attached to the walls of the beak ; the contractions are brought about
by a much weaker system of circular muscles (PI. XXVIII. fig. 3). While the dilators
of the oesophagus are clearly transversely striated, the constrictors are but very faintly so,
if at all. On reaching the central ganglionic mass, the narrow oesophagus is surrounded by
a thin layer of circular muscles. I have failed to find any cross-striation in these muscles.
On emerging from the central nervous mass, a pair (?) of muscles attach the oesophagus
to the posterior fold of the cephalic lobes ; their contraction would tend to draw it backward
through the nerve-mass. These muscles may counteract some of the more sloping of tl)e
dilator muscles of the piunping-aj)paratus, which would tend to pull the oesophagus
forward (PL XXVIII. fig. 5).
* On the justifiable assumption that originally the muscles for each limb belonged to the segment which carries it.
45*
•340 ME. H. M. BERNAKD ON THE
There seems to be no doubt that these muscles are specializations of the primitive
dUators and contractors of the oesophagus of the ancestral form.
The mid-gut is provided with a layer of circular muscles, which appear not to be
transversely striated. They can be demonstrated the whole length of the mid-gut as far
as the stercoral pocket, and can be seen as nearly regular hoops round the alimentary
diverticula throughout the whole body. A distended diverticulum which has lost all
its contents, and consists simply of a hyaline membrane with thin muscular hoops, may
he easily mistaken, at first sight, for a large tracheal tube.
Well-developed longitudinal muscles also occur outside the circular (PI. XXXIII.
fig. 10, and PI. XXX] I. fig. 19, Im).
I have been unable to make out the exact arransrement of the muscles of the stercoral
pocket. Dufour (31) has given an elegant drawing of the stercoral pocket with longi-
tudinal and circular muscles crossing each, other at right angles. I have not been able
either to confirm or to revise this.
The Muscles of the Diaphragm. — I have not been able to make out any special arrange-
ment in the muscles of the diaphragm. Anteriorly, the chitinous infoldings seem to be
«mooth and without a muscular layer. Posteriorly, however, there seems to be a thick
felt-work of muscles, w^hich, owing to the origin of the diaphragm as an infolding of the
cuticle, are probably dermal muscles. This felt-work seems to be specially thick round
the aperture through which the mid-gut passes, and I have little doubt that it acts like
a sphincter muscle to constrict the mid-gut. The pair of dorso-veutral muscles
■descending just posterior to the diaphragm appear to have shifted forward (see PL XXX.
fig. 9).
The portion of the diaphragm immediately under the mid-gut and above the neural
aperture bends suddenly forward and runs along as a support to the mid-gut, but
chiefly, I presume, ia order to constitute a more resistant attachment for the muscles of
the genital glands, just as the endosternite slopes backward for the powerful pedipalpar
muscles.
The cliapliragm of Scorpio seems, like that of Galeodes, to be smootli chitiu anteriorly, but posteriorly
to be covered with a fine layer of muscles. The action of the two pairs of dorso- ventral muscles, the
one in front and the other behind, both in contact with the diaphragm, the former almost, the latter
quite, could hardly fail to constrict the alimentaiy canal, both being attached to the endosternite on
which the alimentary canal rests. The contraction of these muscles would squeeze the alimentary canal
between the upper edge of the aperture through the diaphragm and the endosternite. Whether this
action really takes place I cannot say, but I think it most probable (c/. section on the alimentary canal).
PI. XXXIII. fig. 6 shows a jiair of muscles in the waist of a Spider, the contraction of which would
certainly constrict the alimentary canal.
Histologically, the muscle-fibres do not differ from those of other Arachnids. They
are in all cases separated from each other by fine connective-tissue membranes (PI. XXX.
figs, 12). The fibres themselves are enveloped in an extremely delicate sarcolemma.
In cross-section the contractile striated bands radiate from a central mass of sarcoplasm,
in which is embedded a single row of nuclei.
On reaching the cuticle, the contractile bands separate somewhat, so that the area of
attachment is greater than the sectional area of the muscle itself.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 341
VI. The Nervous System.
The great condensation of the anterior end of the body of Arachnids, in the interests
of locomotion, and in contrast to the sac-like specialization of the abdomen as a receptacle
for food and the genital products, is reflected in the nervous system. In Galeodes,
in spite of the fact that the cephalothorax in this animal has retained three free
segments, the central nervous system is a compact mass composed of a number of fused
ganglion-centres grouped round the oesophagus.
The Central Ganglionic Ilass. — The dorsal or brain portion of this mass consists of
several ganglionic centres, of Mhich the most important are those from which the optic
nerves arise (PI. XXXI. fig. 2). Behind these there appear to be the centres of the
nerves innervating the mid-gut (see, however, below^, w'hile in front there is a nerve-
centre in the middle line above the oesophagus, Avhich belongs to the labral nerves
(PI. XXXI. fig. 6, L). On each side of this, and also slightly above the oesophagus, are
the centres of the cheliceral nerves (ch).
The ventral or trunk portion of the nerve-mass consists of a far greater number of
ganglionic centres. The first and largest are those from which the pedipalpar nerves (pp)
arise, situated just below the cheliceral centres and slightly at the sides of the oesophagus.
The pedipalpar nerve-centres are followed along each side of the nerve-mass by a row of
four nerve-centres supjilying the four pairs of legs (PI. XXXI. fig. 2, 1.2,3.4). Between
these pedipalpar and leg nerve-centres, and immediately below the oesophagus, there
appear to be several median nerve-centres ; these are very large and important,
anteriorly between the pedipalpar centres, and posteriorly between those of the last
pair of legs. These median centres are in direct connection with the nerves running
into the abdomen.
Not only is the condensation of the anterior end of the body thus reflected in the
fusion of the ganglionic centres, but the arrangement of these latter appears to reflect
the changes which have taken jilace in the arrangement of the anterior pairs of limbs.
As we have already seen, the Arachnids are Arthropods specialized by the shifting
forward of the first two pairs of limbs, the tilting up of the cbelicerse to a position above
the mouth and prostomivim, and to a less extent of the pedipalps, to a position at the
sides of the latter. This forward and upw^ard movement is clearly recorded in sections
of the brain. The cheliceral nerve-centres, as is well known *, belong primarily to the
infra-oesophageal system, and have secondarily moved up the oesophageal commissure to
positions more or less supra-oesophageal. In Galeodes the cheliceral ganglia have
travelled far up along the oesophageal commissures, so as to be practically supra-
oesophageal. In this process they seem to Jiave pushed the optic ganglia backward ; at
least, this action is suggested by an examination of sagittal sections such as that shown
in PI. XXXI. fig. 2.
The variations in the forms of the central ganglionic mass in Arachnids reflect the various
specializations of the cephalothorax, and show, as we should expect, many differences in the relative
positions of the ganglia.
* Cf. Mctschnikoff (54) and Balfour (i).
342 MR. H. M. BEENARD ON THE
In the Spiders the six segments of the ccplialothorax have been evenly fused together ; hence the
ventral part of the ganglionic mass spreads back along the floor of the ceplialothorax, while the
supra-oesophageal portion lies quite anteriorly (PI. XXXI. fig. 3 o). The same ganglionic centres are
visible as are found in Galeodes (fig. 3 b), but in slightly different, and apparently more primitive,
positions. Owing to the forward projection of the cephalic lobes, in order to give the mandibles their
downward slope, the optic ganglia have been drawn to the front more over the cheliceral ganglia, which
appear to lie somewhat lower at the sides of the oesophagus than in Galeodes. Indeed, in young
spiders (Epeiridis ?) just hatched the cheliceral ganglion lies on each side well below the upper level
of the oesophagus, and seems, with the pedipalpar ganglion, to belong to the (Esophageal commissure.
Again, the median (abdominal) ganglionic centres stretch backward beyond those of the last pair of
legs; indeed it seems in the Araneids as if it might be possible to count how many original segmental
ganglia the median abdominal ganglion represents, by counting the number of connective-tissue strands
which pierce it in the median line.
In Scorpio the whole ventral surface of the cephalothorax has been pushed forward by the genital
aperture, with the result that the coxae of the pedipalps, except at their most distal ends, are no longer
in contact with the ground, the coxce of the 1st and 2ud pairs of legs being pushed forward under
them. This remarkable specialization of the cephalothorax has been reflected in the central ganglionic
mass, the ventral portion of which lies right forward directly under the supra-oesophageal portion
(fig. 3 c). This is well shown in Blanchard's ' Arachnides/ pi. vi. The forward thi-ust of the ventral
portion of the nerve-mass has brought the ganglionic centres of the nerves of the 1st pair of walking-
legs under those of the pedipalps, while those of the chelicerse are well above the level of the
oesophagus, and appear to be pushed round backward so as to lie in a plane posterior to that in which
lie the ganglia of the pedipalps and of the 1st pair of walking-legs. (Fig. 3 c is hardly pronounced
enough in this respect.)
This thrusting forward of the ganglionic centres composing the ventral portion of the central
nerve-mass, owing to the shifting forward of the limbs, is still more marked iu the Phalangidae, in
which the nerve-mass lies very largely in the transverse plane (fig. 2>d).
In the Pseudoscorpions the same ganglionic centres are discoverable. The enormous backward deve-
lopment of the coxae of the pedipalps, driving back the coxae of the remaining legs, finds some reflection
in the brain. The ganglionic centres of the six limbs all seem to radiate from the proximal end of the
root of the pedipalpar nerves (fig. 3 e) . The cheliceral nerves seem to rise from the upper ends of the
oesophageal commissures without being quite supra-oesophageal. The supra-oesophageal portion lies
forward over the anterior half of the ventral portion.
The central nervous system of Gamasus, according to Winkler's description (76), is of great
morphological interest. While the concentration of the limbs at the anterior end of the body has
condensed the infra-cesophageal portion, the cheliceral ganglia are said to have retained their positions
at the lower ends of the ossophageal commissures. Inasmuch, however, as the muscles moving
the powerful chelicerre are inserted far back on the dorsal wall, the cheliceral nerve, in order to
reach them, has to traverse the supra-oesophageal portion. This, if correct, has been brought
about by the secondary shifting of the cheliceral muscles carrying the nerves, which originally pointed
forward, backward over the brain until they have become surrounded by brain-substance. This is a
very high specialization of a primitive condition, jjointing back to a time when the cheliceral ganglia
were infra-oesophageal.
The nervous centres of the Pedipalpi at my disposal were not well enough preserved for the purpose
of making trustworthy comparisons.
If, then, we start from the primitive arrangement in which all the segmental ganglia were ventral in
position, the nerve-centres of the Arachnids can be deduced from it by progressive forward concentration.
The first movement was doubtless made by the cheliceral ganglia, following the tilting forward of the
COMPAliATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 313
limbs tliey innervate, which, as we have explained, was probable the original specialization of the Arachnids
as a class. The Spiders show but little advance on this. The Galeodidae, in spite of the comparative
freedom of the three posterior segments, show greater concentration of the ventral segmental ganglia
than do the Aranese with their moi-e uniform fusion of the cephalothoracic segments. Scorpio shows
still greater specialization, the ganglia are pushed forward so as to form an almost cubical mass sur-
rounding the (Esophagus. Lastly, iu Phalangiuin, the forward movement of the limbs and genital
aperture has thrust the segmental ganglia of the cephaiothorax forward and upward till they lie almost
in the transverse plane.
Pt'iiicipcd Nerves. — Thenervos leaving the central nerve-mass of Galeodes are : —
(1) The optic nerves, which run forward from behind, I'emaining in contact with the
hrain before bending upward to the eyes (PL XXXI. figs. 2, 5, on).
(2) The cheliceral nerves (figs. 4, 5, ch), which rise just in front of the optic nerves,
and soon give off a branch [ch!) to the cheliceral muscles.
(3) The powerful nerves to the pedipalps, wliich are double, dividing into smaller
dorsal and larger ventral branches soon after leaving the brain (fig. 6, pp).
(4, 5, 6, 7) The nerves to the other limbs, all of which are double, a fact which was
recognized by Kittaiy, but only noticed for the two posterior legs by Blanchard. Iu
each of the last two limbs the smaller branch accompanies the mid-gut diverticulum.
(8, 9) Three long nerves, which run straight backward from the posterior ventral end
of the nerve-mass, one in the median line and the other two on each side of it. They
run through the neural aperture of the diaphragm (i)). The lateral nerves {g) supply the
genital glands : while the median {ah) is the main abdominal nerve, which, after passing
through the neural arch of the diajihragm, swells into a large ganglion, the abdominal
ganglion ; it then runs backward immediately under the central canal of the mid-gut,
innervating it and the stercoral pocket, and also apparently sending up nerves among the
digestive tubules.
(10) Nerves which appear to leave the posterior end of the dorsal (supra-oesophageal)
portion of the mass to supply the mid-gut. So far as I can make out, these do not leave
the brain in compact bundles of fibres, but spring from the whole posterior surface of
the brain wherever the alimentary canal is in contact with it. I have assumed that the
centre is the mass which lies behind the optic ganglia, but I failed to find any very
clear connections.
(11) The paired (or unpaired) nerves which leave the brain between the cheliceral
nerves and supply the labruni (PI. XXXI. fig. 6, L).
(12) Paired nerves leaving the anterior end of the ventral portion of the nerve-mass,
supplying the labium.
(13) Two small nerves leave the brain on each side between those running into the
2nd and 3rd legs (or else branch from these in some way), and run to the stigmatic
apertures (fig. 6, stig.).
Peripheral Nerves. — Of the peripheral nervous system I have been able to fi.nd only
traces. A network of fibres runs in close contact with the hypodermis, supplying the
cuticle and hairs. These nerves are sometimes marked out in white in parts of the dorsal
sm-face where pigment has collected. I have not succeeded in tracing these integumental
nerves to their sources.
344 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
The heart is very richly supplied with nerves. In portions of that organ dissected
out, cleared, and examined in toto, it seems to be enveloped in a network of nerve-fibres
which is especially developed in its dorsal wall. Pig. 7, PI. XXXIV., is a small portion
of the heart (ventral aspect) showing a layer of nerve-fibres (w) running longitudinally.
The exact source of these heart-nerves I have been unable to discover.
A not very close network also surrounds the digestive tubules of the mid-gut, the
main canal of which is very richly supplied anteriorly, apparently direct from the brain,
but posteriorly also from the great abdominal nerve (PI. XXXI. fig. 6, ah).
The Abdominal Ganglion. — The abdominal ganglion lies just above the genital aperture,
and in all probability supplies it with nerves, although the genital glands themselves
have their own independent nerves coming direct from the central nerve-mass.
It is possible that this position of the abdominal ganglion may be due to the abdominal
musculature, which is only developed to any great extent in the first two or three
abdominal segments {cf. p. 336).
The nerve which in other Arachnids is of importance for comparison is the abdominal nerve, as its
ganglionic svpellings may be primitive ganglia of the ventral nerve-chord which have persisted as separate
centres, and have not beeu incorporated in the cephalothoracic nerve-centre.
In the Aranese there are no large swellings on the abdominal nerve. In this group, as we have
seen, the posterior median component of the central nerve-mass appears to consist of five or six
fused segmental ganglia, i. e. if the connective-tissue strands which penetrate it dorso-ventrally represent
primitive divisions.
In Phrynus, also, there are apparently no ganglionic swellings in the abdominal nerve.
The same is true of the Pseudoscorpions.
In Thehjphoims there is a large svpelling at the posterior end of the abdomen, apparently in associa-
tion with the muscles for elevating the three tail-segments and for moving the caudal appendage.
In Phalangium a ganglionic swelling is figured by Blanchard. This may be in association with the
highly specialized ovipositors and penes, with tbeir own musculature, which characterize tliis group.
In Scorpio, in which animal alone the musculature of the abdomen is highly developed, there are
seven ganglionic swellings of the abdominal nerve *, which may again be associated with the developed
musculature for the movement of the tail-segments.
The "Sympathetic." — The only other nerves to which I should like to refer are the "sympathetic."
Both St. Remy t and A. Schneider J describe a stomatogastric nerve as branching off laterally from the
brains of Spiders. Schimkevitch also describes a pair of nerves proceeding backwards from the brain,
but, like myself, failed to establish their places of origin. Blanchard figures nerves running backward
from the brain on to the mid-gut of Galeodes, and scattered nerves running backward on to the mid-gut
from the brain of Mygale. I have myself, as above stated, failed to find any clear connection between
the brain and mid-gut in either Galeodes, the Spiders, the Scorpions, Pseudoscorpions, or Opiliouidse.
Although the brain is, in all or nearly all cases, in contact with the mid-gut and its lobes, until I read
the works of St. Remy and Schneider I had concluded that the nerves leave the posterior surface of
the brain and spread out over the mid-gut, not in definite bundles, but as single fibres, which easily
* Cy. Newport (58), "On the Nervous System, &e., of Macrourous Arachnids," Phil. Trans, vol. cxxxiii. 1843^
and Blanchard (24), ' Les Arachnides.'
t St. Eemy (61), ' Contributions u I'Etude du Cerveau chez les Arthropodes tracheates,' Poitiers, 1890.
J Schneider (64), '> Systiime stomatogastrique des Aranoides,'" Tab. Zool. ii. 1891.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 345
escape observation among the connective tissue. Further research is much needed. In the meantime,
perhaps, we are not wrong in assuming that the great nerve-mass in the brain, behind the optic ganglia
(which shows as a crescent in horizontal sections of Spiders, behind and half encircling the optic
lobes), would be the "sympathetic" ganglionic centre.
The nerves of Galeodes are always in very close association with tracheae, a fact
which is interesting in connection with the close association of the nerves with the
blood-jmssages in Scorpio.
Histology. — One observation seems to be worth recording. The cross-sections of the
large nerve-trunks show the usual fine network which represents so many tubes cut
across. But, in other parts of the body, where nerve-fibres can be seen isolated, they
are exquisitely fine fibrils with fusiform nuclei (PI. XXXII. fig. 7). These are most
easily seen in the racquet-organs (fig. 1, nf), but can be found also in other parts of the
body. What, then, are the tubes ? I would like to suggest the following explanation.
In order to protect the nerve-fibrils from mechanical stimuli along their courses, they
run in a delicate connective-tissue framework (comparable to that which envelops the
muscle-fibrils, PI. XXX. fig. 12). The hollow tubes are filled with fluid, and the fibrils
run along closely applied to their walls, the whole arrangement being an adaptation to
protect the nerve from mechanical stimulus of any kind along its course. In the
racquet-organs the fibrils are in no such danger ; they are enclosed, at least in the shaft,
in a stout cylinder of chitin, and run singly to their destinations. An examination of
the points of departure of large nerve-trunks from the brain leaves little doubt that the
tubes, which are at this point very large and irregular, are not the nerves themselves.
The fibrils themselves are, as a rule, too fine to be distinguished in the walls of the
tube, but their fusiform nuclei are often quite distinct.
I have found the same nerve-fibrils in Scorpio., but have been unable to demonstrate
the individual nerve-fibrils in Spiders. An examination of the general structure of the
nerve-strands as they leave tlie brain, however, leaves little doubt in my mind that the
irregular tubes are but fluid-channels in the walls of which the — as a ru.le invisible —
nerve-fibrils run. The absolute necessity of isolating the fibrils in their courses from
the periphery to the brain seems certainly to require some such arrangement.
VII. The Sense Organs.
The Galeodidae, which are for the most part great hunters, are well provided with
sense organs.
We have to describe (1) the large median eyes, (2) the vestigial lateral eyes, (3) the
protrusible organ at the tij)s of the pedij^alps, (4) the racquet-organs on the last pair of
legs, (5) sensory setae, (6) certain specialized areas containing organs of unknown
significance, presumed to be sensory.
(1) The Median Eyes. — The large pair of median eyes stand on a tubercle anteriorly
in the dorsal suture, between the cephalic lobes. This tubercle, as we have seen, is
probably the remains of the original dorsal surface {cf. p. 310).
The lenses are round glassy prominences. In the genus Galeodes they are very large
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 46
346 ME. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
compared with the size of the ocular tubercle, and somewhat tilted so as to look side-
•oays, their axes making together an angle of 90". In the genus Bhax (PI. XXVII.
fig. 6) the lenses are small and lie rather wide apart, looking almost directly upward.
The lens is formed by the sudden thickening of the cliitinous lamina? of the cuticle,
and is thus itself laminate *. As it stains deeply, it is probable that these layers are
largely protoplasmic or permeated with fluid in the interest of transparency. The
outermost layer of the chitin is generally wrinkled (fig. 9), as if it had shrunk by the
al)straction of such a fluid. The whole eye, indeed {I. e. the soft parts), is abun-
dantly provided with canals for the free circulation of fluids through all the tissues
{fig. 8, Ic).
In the angle between the globular lens and the cuticle from which it is developed a thick
fold of pigmented hypodermis forms a kind of iris. It is apparently rather more pro-
noimced than Leydig's ' iris-artige Giirtel ' in the eyes of Spiders, which was only a ring
of pigmented hypodermis. In Galeodes it is a thick and very definite fold arranged right
round the retina (PL XXXI. figs. 7, 8, 9). Its apparent function will be presently
described.
The general character of the eye can be obtained from the figures. The most
remarkable featui^e is the thinning away of the retina in the axis of the eye, and its
great development roimd the periphery. The i-elative measttrements were as follows : —
greatest depth of lens 25, depth of retina in the axis of the eye 3, at the periphery
(posterior) 20, (anterior) 12.
The whole of the soft parts of the eye are enclosed in a well-developed connective-tissue
membrane, which stretches across below the ocular tubercle (PI. XXXI. figs. 7, 8, m).
The optic nerve enters the postero-median region of this ocular chamber, and
immediately swells into a ganglionic mass. From the dorsal surface of this ganglion
the fibres bend sharply to right and left to run in all directions to the retina-cells.
Pitrment-cells, with rather large round granules, begin to accompany them almost
immediately they leave the ganglion, like single or double strings of beads.
The space aroimd this ganglion, and for some way up at the sides of the retina, i. e.
between it and the chitinous walls of the ocular tubercle, is filled with blood-cells and
traversed by connective-tissue fibres. High tip round the lens the circular iris-like fold
of the hypodermis is filled by a close reticulum of coarse threads like a sponge {sp).
This spongy cushion, which completely surrounds the lens in the angle between it and
the chitinous body-wall, may perhaps have something to do in effecting or regulating,
by means of fluid pressure, slight movements of the eye. Prom the flexibility of the
cuticle, close round the lens (fig. l,fl), some slight movements seem possible, and I
have found no other mechanism for the purpose.
From the fluid space beneath the retina and around the ganglion an enormous number
of channels, anastomosing freely with each other (fig. 8, Ic), run up between the
retinal cells as far as the hypodermal cells which secrete the lens. These, no doubt,
* Bertkau(i8) says that in Spiders there are more laminae in the lens than in the cuticle. This is not the
case in Galeodes ; so far as it is possible to count the lamina? accurately, the numbers agree.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 347
supply nourishment to the retinal cells and to the hypodcrmis, and fluid to the lens.
The ahstraction of the fluid from these canals causes the collapse of the retina and its
shrinking from the lens and from the circular iris-like fold of tlie hypodermis, in the
way shown in figs. 7, 8 (PI. XXXI.).
Owing to the uusatisfactory state of preservation of the tissues, I have not succeeded
in making out the histology of the retina. The collapse of the fluid-channels above
mentioned, which perhaps kept the retinal elements distinct, in all cases confused the
field. Certain important points were, however, clear :
1. There was no developed vitreous body, the hypodermis-cells (%) l)cing confined to a
single thin layer of closely-packed cells with large nuclei, separated from the distal
ends of the retinal cells by a very fine membrane.
2. The clear ends of the retinal cells, which were very short in the axis of the eye,
but longer round its j^eriphery, showed no difi'erentiation into rods.
3. A short way below the commencement of the pigment-layer is found a zone of large
nuclei, wliich are apparently the nuclei of the retinal cells. I could make out no
retinulation or grouping of retinal cells round a rhabdom. I could indeed find no
traces of rhabdoms, and from the very crooked courses of the retinal elements in the
axial portion of tlie eye I doubt whether any such could have been present. It appeared
to me as if the retinal cells ran singly, closely entwined by strings of pigment-granules,
which, liere and there, were clumped together. These pigment-clumps may, in some
cases, indicate the presence of the nuclei of the pigment-cells, in the pseudopodia of
which the strings of smaU pigment-granules are probably enclosed.
4. While the hypodermis-cells secreting the lens are naturally clear and free from
pigment, those which form the iris-like fold, and which from thence line the rest of the
ocular tubercle, are closely packed with very large round pigment-granules.
A comparison of the eye of Galeodcs with the homologous eyes in Scorpio on the one hand (Lan-
kester and Bourne, 45), and of the Spiders on the other (Bertkau, 18), shows how little reliance can be
placed on eyes in establishing points of relationship. It is not too much to say that, according to the
descriptions given, the median eyes of these thi'ce Arachnids, the Scorpions, Spiders, and Galeodidse,
are built on entirely different plans. A similarly complete difference between the lateral eyes of the
Pseudoscorpions and those of the Scoi'pions has also been pointed out (10).
(2) T//e Vestigial Lateral Ei/es. — The most interesting point about these eyes is
their extreme irregularity. These lateral eyes occiu-red in all specimens of Galeodidse
which I have examined, sometimes in two pairs. They lie under the remarkable area
at the sides of the cephalic lobes, and thus look forward and downward. Tliis fact
again suggests that these areas are quite secondary modifications developed for the
purpose above described (jj. 321) since the lateral eyes left the ocular tubercles.
These lateral eyes vary in size and shape, the anterior being sometimes long and
elliptical, while the posterior is small and round ; sometimes they have run together to
form a long narrow single eye (PI. XXIX. fig. I, le, Rhax melaiia). The lees has eutu-ely
atrophied, and the eyes are inserted into j)its on the inner side of the thick cuticle (14).
It is on this account that I call the eyes vestigial, although, from the develojiment
46*
348 ME. H. M. BEENARD ON THE
of their nerves and the masses of pigment enveloping the retinal cells, they seem, at
least in some cnses, to be functional. I have not been able to make out any more of
the finer details of these eyes than those which are given in the paper referred to.
The great diversity in number, arrangement, and structure of the lateral eyes of Arachnids lends
some support to the view that they are secondary developments. A review of their positions and
numbers throughout the Arachnida inclines one to the belief that we have in the Aviculariidse the most
primitive condition. There we find an ocular tubercle with two large round median eyes, one on
each side of the median line. These median eyes are of the typical appearance of the median eyes
of the Arachnida, which generally seem to have a blue-greenish colour. On each side of the median
line, symmetrically an-auged, on the base of the tubercle, are three eyes differing in size, shape, and
appearance, as well from the median eyes as from one another. These are generally red or yellow, and
often very lustrous. Whether these accessory eyes of the tubercle are later developments than the
median eyes or not it is impossible to say, but I am inclined to think that, whenever they arose, they
belong in their place of origin to the ocular tubercle.
In no other Arachnid are they now found on the tubercle, having, it appears, wandered off laterally
on to the cephalic lobes.
In the Spiders they have not wandered far from the principal eyes, but are grouped in various ways
in front of and at tiie sides of the principal eyes, which, as a rule, retain their positions close to the
median line. This arrangement might clearly have been brought about by tlie obliteration of the optic
tubercle.
In Phrynus the little groups of three lateral eyes on each side appear to have wandered ofiF from the
tubercle a short way outward and backward, leaving the median eyes in the original position, i. e. as
in Galeodes, on a tubercle anteriorly in the suture between the cej^halic lobes.
In Thelyphonus the optic tubercle is obscured, but the median eyes retain their position upon the
somewhat modified anterior edge of the cephalothorax. The brilliant lateral eyes are in groups (three
in each in my specimens, as in Phrynus), but each group has travelled further back than in Phrynus,
and is at the edge of the dorsal surface, and far behind the median eyes.
In Scorpio the median eyes frequently occur on an ocular tubercle, arranged at very different points
along the suture between the cephalic lobes. The lateral eyes appear to have wandered off when the
tubercle was in its original (anterior) position, inasmuch as, while the median eyes have wandered
backward, the lateral eyes are arranged near the anterior corners of the dorsal surface. They are in
groups of from five to two.
The Phalangidae have retained the ocular tubercle, which is very prominent, owing to the tilting of
the eyes so as to look out sideways from the median line. As in many Scorpionidae, it has shifted back
along the cephalic suture. Lateral eyes occur in rare cases [Cyphophthalmus) , but it is a question
whether, in these cases, the lateral eyes are not the median eyes wandered apart.
In the Chernetidse the median eyes have degenerated. The lateral eyes, arranged singly or in pairs,
are alone present at the lateral edges of the dorsal surface. It is, perhaps, possible that the lateral eyes
here, as in Cyphophthalmus, are the homologues of the median eyes, and that these median eyes
wandered apart, ou the obliteration of the ocular tubercle *. It is simpler, perhaps, to believe that the
eyes spread out from the tubercle, those in the middle line having degenerated.
When the Acari have eyes they appear to be always laterally placed, and the same remarks apply
to them as to Chelifer.
These lateral eyes are generally, if not in all cases, innervated from branches of the median optic
nerve, which supports the hypothesis that they wandered off the ocular tubercle.
* MetBchnikoff (" Entwickelungsgeschichte des Chelifer," Z. w. Z. xxi. p. 71) makes no observations on the
origin ot the eyes.
COMPAKATIVE JIOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 349
(3) The Pi'otntsible Organ at the T'q)s of the Pedifalps. — The invagination at the tips of
the pedipalps, the sensory nature of Avhich is evident directly its structure is taken into
account, requires to he described in detail.
The chitinous mechanism is as follows : — A pair of soft-skinned lips (PI. XXXI.
fig. 10) open transversely across the tip of the limb. The ventral lip has no hard
framework, but the dorsal is only soft where it is in contact with the ventral ; it soon
becomes a solid chitinous arch or lid, which moves on hinges at its ends (fig. 11). This
lid is opened by a muscle in the next proximal joint (tig. 12, m^\ a long tendon from
the muscle being attached to the lid on that side of the line passing through the hinges
which is opposite to that on which the lips occur. The aperture leads into a deep conical
invagination, running through the whole length of the joint, which is free in Galeodes
(PI, XXIX. fig. 3, and PI. XXXI. fig. 12), but fused with the next proximal joint
in Rhax (PI. XXIX. fig. 4). The folded walls of the invagination gradually converge,
and run down the tibia as a long tendon. This tendon is attached to a very powerful
muscle (Wo)' which almost fills up the proximal end of the tibia. The contraction of this
muscle draws down the invagination and tightly closes the lips.
The whole of this chitinous invagination is covered by an epithelium continued down
the tendon as far as the muscle, where it becomes lost to sight. The green pigment-
cells {cf. p. 331) gravitate towards the tendon as towards the outer cuticle.
The epithelium covering the inner ventral face of the flattened conical invagination is
deep, contains several layers of smaU nuclei (Pi. XXXI. figs. 13, 13 a), and is sensory.
The sensory cells send fine hair-like processes through the cuticle, which project into
the invagination, clothing its ventral wall like a fine velvet. These hairs are about
1 n thick and 75 ^i long ; the sm-face formed by their tips is wavy, perhaps for the
purpose of increase (PI. XXXI. figs. 13 and 14).
The cuticle, traversed by these hair-like processes, is regularly channelled through by
rows of pores close together, so that it has, at times, a net- or lattice-like appearance. It
is considerably thickened, perhaps to keep the sensory area spread out. It is, neverthe-
less, liable to be folded longitudinally, the longitudinal bars of the latticework being
thicker than the transverse (fig. 14). The dorsal sm"face of this sensory invagination is
entirely free from such hairs, and is extremely thin and delicate. When the lips are
closed the tips of the sensory hairs rest against this membrane.
When the Ups are open the up2)ermost sensory haii-s jn-oject through the gape. They
:are not, however, confined to this part, but continue right down to near the extreme
base of the pit, where it runs into the tendon {cf. fig. 12). Pigs. 15, 16, 17 show the
organ fully protruded, this protrusion probably being effected by blood-pressure *. In
this condition the sensory haii-s deej) down in the base of the invagination are brought
into closer contact with the outer air.
As to the function of these organs there has been some difference of opinion. In
* lu its evagioated condition the outer skin is very smooth and glistens like satin, wliich fact would account for
the following description of an eye-witness : — '• When the palpi arc applied to any object, a sort of phosphorescent
flame seems to be emittted from them." — Murray's ' Economic Entomology,' p. 42.
350 ME. H. M. BEENA.ED ON THE
describing the sbavp sense of smell of these animals, Lichtenstein and Herbst (48, p. 52)
state that it is eliiefly localized in the hollow knob at the tip of the feeler. Dufour,
however, who discovered the retractile organ itself, interpreted it as being a sucker.
Koch had adopted the earlier view, which, from the above description, seems almost
certainly the correct one. That it is not an organ " pour s'accrocher ou grimper "
(Dufour, and recently re-stated by Bertkau, 20, and Gaubert, 32) follows from the fact
that it has no teeth and no circular or radial muscles, and is lined with fine hairs on.
only one side, which hairs extend right down into its base, where they could take no
part in any external action. Turther, Avhen fully distended (PI. XXXI. figs. 15, 16, 17)
it does not make a complete circle as a sucker must do, and is not conveniently placed,
opening not downward but outward. All the observations on living animals show
that the pedipalps are organs of fine sensation *.
So far as is at present known, the only other Arachnids with invaginations at the tips of the pedipalps
are the male Spiders. In these they are specialized as sexual organs ; the transition between a
sensory invagination and a spermatophore carrier is not difficult to imagine when we remember that
the Spiders have lost the highly sensory organs which, presumably, were at one time present on the
limbs, either in front of or behind the genital aperture (compare the pectines of Scorpio and the
racquets of Galeodes).
In other Arachnids there is no doubt that the pedipalps, as occupying the foremost position of all the
limbs, are the seat of fine sensation. The Scorpions and Pseudoscorpions use their pincers with great
caution, as if feeling with them. Hansen has described and figured fine tactile hairs on the pincers of
Scorpio. Long delicate hairs a])pear to rise from the bottom of cup-like pits on the pincers of some
Pseudoscorpions. In Phrynus, within the most distal joint or claw of the pedipalps, there is a sensory
area surrounded by hairs of different shapes |.
(4) The Racquet-organs. — Five of these, as is well known, are found, in most, if not in
all, genera, on each of the last walking-legs, two on the coxa, two on the trochanter,
and one on the femur.
On comparing this with the pectines of Scorpio we find a striking parallel, inasmuch as the pectines
in many genera show clearly that they consist of the same thiee joints, i. e. of the coxa, the trochanter,
and a small portion of the femur of a pair of legs behind the genital aperture. We may perhaps
conclude from this that, in the original Arachnid, the limbs both in front of and behind the aperture
were provided with sensory organs on these joints.
The racquet-organs stand sti-aight out ventrally from the cuticle of the leg as tubular
outgrowths, slightly folded round their bases for the sake of flexibility. This tubular
shaft varies greatly in length, being long in Galeodes, which runs high off the ground
on its long and jiowertul legs, but very short in Rhax, wliich has comparatively short
* " Les palpes s'agitent alors commc pour interrogcr I'espace " (Dufour). See, further, the account in Murray's-
' Economic Eutomology,' quoted in the preceding note.
t In the Ann. & Mag. N. H. ser. 6, vol. xi. 1S93, I stated that this area sloped away sideways under the
cuticle into a pocket which ran down into the next joint, and was provided, as in (laleodcs, with sensory hairs.
I have been unable to find any trace of this pocket in sections, and have re-examined the cleared specimen in which
it seemed so apparent. It was some time before I found the clue to the discrepancy ; the cleared specimen is
apparently preparing to shed its skin, and the sensory area is repeated beneath the cuticle and reaches into the
next joint, thereby giving the appearance which deceived me.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGr OF THE GALEODID^.. 351
legs. There may also he some difference in the length of the shaft in males and
females.
In sagittal sections the sensory processes of the pectincs of Scorpio are seen to belong to the ventral,
if not to the anterior, face of the limb, which is folded backward. They are not on the posterior face,
where they ought to be if they were the derivatives of gills like those of Limulus.
The shaft suddenly expands into a fan, which is apparently capahle of hcnding on the
former. The more median fans are symmetrical with the shaft ; those lying externally
are asymmetrical, the inner or median edge heing almost on a line with the shaft.
The distal edge of the fan has a fold rvmning along its wliole length. The investiga-
tion of the exact natui'C of this fold has heen a task of some difficnltv. The foUowinsr
description differs from that given hy Gauhert (32), whose account seems to me rather
too simple and diagrammatic. It is true that his drawings refer to the racquet-organs of
Odleodes barbarus, whereas mine refer to those of Galeodes arabs and Rhax fsp.).
Compared w'ith the depth of the whole fan (excluding the shaft) the fold is very
shallow, -2^0- to -0-5-, and not ,V, as in Gauhert's drawing *. The fold appears to he very
similar in Mhax and Galeodes ; the form in section can he gathered from PI. XXXII.
fig. 2. We have a sharp, stiff ridge (in cross-section a digitiform process), bordering the
furrow anteriorly, while the posterior hoimdary is holster-shaped (in section a knoh-like
process), which either stands straight up or hends over towards the stiff digitiform
process (PI. XXXII. fig. 3).
The nerve-endings in the specimens examined by me are not whei-e Gauhert figiu^es
them, ^. e. in the base of the fvuTow, but on the bolster-shaped ridge, in such a position
that when it stands up so that the fiu-row is open the nerve-endings are along the most
distal edge of the ridge ; when, however, the bolster rolls inward against the sharp,
stiff ridge, the nerve-endings would be protected by this latter ridge {of. the figures).
The chitin of the whole racquet-organ is very thick and tough, and my attempts to
make thin sections almost completely failed. The lateral edges of the fans are specially
thickened (PI. XXXII. fig. 4, ch). On the flat surfaces the ordinary staining layers of the
cuticle can be made out, and an outermost refractive layer which has a very wavy
external surface. The waviness is very pronounced near the furrow-edge of the fan, and
may be due to the movement of the two ridges bordering the furrow in opening out and
closing one against another. An irregular row of markings occurs on each face of the
fan ; these are apparently apertures for the passage of fine sensory hairs, which are, as a
rule, destroyed. I have, how^evcr, found one or two m situ (cf. fig. 4, sh).
Internally the racquets show the following arrangement of tissue : — The powerful
nerve, whose fibres are closely mingled with fine tracheal tubes, spreads out like a fan
on leaving the shaft. The nerve-fibrils appear to run distinct, bathed in blood-fluid, for,
between the fibrils, blood-ceUs are freely scattered. The fibrils themselves have long
fusiform nuclei in their course ; whether more than one to a fibril, and if so at what
distance apart, I have been imable to make out (PI. XXXII. fig. 1, nf.).
After traversing about halfway through the depth of tlie fan, the nerve-fibres no longer
* Plate 3. fig. 5. It is necessary to refer to Gauhert's details, as his account is, so far as I know, the first
attempt to describe the minute anatomy of these organs.
352 ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
radiate so regularly outwaixl, but have to bend about among a great network of blood-
lacimse wMcb are limited by connective tissue (PL XXXII. figs. 1, 5, ret).
This irregular arrangement gradually becomes regular again. It appears to be as
follows, my description being based upon racquets cleared in cedar oil and studied by the
liighest oil-immersion lens applicable (3 mm. apochromatic of Zeiss) : — A thick epithelium
runs in wavy folds, as shown in the diagrammatic cross-section, fig. 8. The nerve-fibres
all rixn. on the posterior side of this epithelium, largely within the posterior folds
themselves. In the anterior folds, i. e. between the epithelium and the cuticle, the space
is apparently filled with blood-fluid, in which are a few blood-cells.
Still nearer the outer edge of the fan (figs. 1 & 6) the folded epithelium flattens out
again, and the nerve-fibres radiate again freely outward. They terminate in a long row of
minute pores through the chitin of the outermost face of the bolster, but do not appear
to project. As above described, when the bolster rolls inward towards the furrow these
nerve-endings are bent down under protection of the stiff ridge. In one of my mounted
specimens the bolster is standing up throughout a part of its course, aj)parently unable
to roll round, owing to the presence of a foreign body ; on each side of this tract,
however, the bolster is rolled round and the nerve-endings are bent backward.
Eig. 9 (PI. XXXII.) is the surface view of the edge of a racquet-organ of a Bhax, which
shows the nerve-endings bent sharply round, perhaps abnormally so, owing to the pressure
of the cover-glass. The protecting ridge {j)r) has also in this case been flattened out.
I could find no trace of any muscular fibres which could effect the movements in the
ridges. I therefore think that the erection of the bolster-ridge is due to fluid
pressure. It seems also not improbable that the folded epithelium effects this erection
by means of the fluids contained in the folds.
There is uo histological resemblance between tiie racquet-organs of Galeodes and the pectines of
Scorpio (cf. Gaubert). The "teeth" of the latter, however, in sagittal sections, look as if they were
erectile by means of fluid pressure.
(5) Sensor?/ SetcB. — The Galeodidae are very richly provided with setse, of which there
are several specialized forms — specialized, that is, as sense-organs. I must confine
myself to two, having made no special study of these structures.
1. We have the plumose bail's, which appear to be sensory, but arc not necessarily so ;
they are generally found grouped on the inner sides of the chelicerse, and serve, perhaps,
as a felt-like barrier to prevent the escape of nourisliing fluids. The elaborate sieve in
front of the mouth is probably due to the concrescence of plumose hairs. On the other
hand, the two long plumose hairs, one on each tip of the under-lip, look like sensory
organs. In all these plumose haii's fine staining channels can be seen running out
laterally from the central axis of the hair into each barb.
2. While it is probable that all the longer hairs are to some slight extent sense-organs,
there are some which are highly specialized as such, notably the long fine hairs on the
pedipalps and on the first pair of legs, which, as above stated, is in process of becoming
a second pair of feelers.
PI. XXXII. fig. 12 is a drawing of the tip of the first pair of legs (3rd appendage) of a
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 353
small Galeodes, cleared in cedar oil. It shows the base of each haii- suiTounded by a
si^ecialized arrangement of cells. Eig. 18 is an enlarged drawing of a few of these, as
seen in the cleared specimen, while figs. 14 and 15 rejiresent others in section.
We find the base of the hair- slung, in a chamber in the solid cuticle, by the hard
refractive outermost layer, as above described (p. 333). Its innermost end is attached by
elastic (?) fibres to the waU of the chamber. These radiating fibres thus form tos-ether
a septum across the chamber, dividing it into an upper and a lower portion. The
uj)per portion is kept supplied Avith body-fluid by means of a seimrate channel (fig. 14, c).
which I have already mentioned. The hair itself owes its origin to a group of cells
which are attached to it only by protoplasmic processes, apjiarently to avoid overcrowding
round its small base. One, two, thi-ee, or more nerves run from the base of the hair and
swell into large ganglion-cells proximally to the group of the secreting-cells. These two
groups together (the secreting- and the ganglion-cells) are protected under a dome-like
arrangement of cells (fig. 14, ro) wliich projects into the hollow of the liml), and is closed
on all sides except proximally, where the nerves run out to join the nerve-trunks in the
limb. Eig. 15 represents a small terminal hair where the protecting roof is not reqrured.
The exact innervation of the hair I have not succeeded in making out. I am disposed
to think that the nerves terminate in the septum of radiating fibres, and for the follo-vving
reasons : — (a) I can find nothing like a nerve running up the axis of the hair ; (6) the
radiating fibres would natm-ally be the first to be strained or relaxed — strained on the side
towards which the hah- is bent by contact with an object, and relaxed on the opposite side ;
((?) the development of a special channel between the portion above the septum and the
cavity of the limb may perhaps imply great physiological activity of this fibrous septum,
(6) Other Organs of unknown significance. — At the tips of the pedij^alps and of the
pair of legs, which, in the Galeodidse, are gradually losing their claws and becoming
feelers [cf. the Pedipalpi), remarkable sensory organs have apparently been discovered
simultaneously by Bertkau (20) and Gaubert (32). In each case they occru* on the
upper, or dorsal, and slightly on the outer sides of the limbs. They occiu" in con-
siderable nimibers, but not in regular arrangement nor in any well-defined areas.
Gaubert has given a description of these organs, mth a figiu-e showing their distribution
on the first leg of Galeodes harharus, and Bertkau has given drawings of the appearance
of the organs in section on the j)edipalps of Solpuga flavescens. The observations I have
been able to make on these organs are, unfortunately, very far from complete, especially
in reference to their soft parts.
I have found three kinds : —
1, (PL XXXII. figs. 11 a, 11 b.) A sort of barrel-like pit in the cuticle, which appears to
open externally, and from the base of which a fine pointed process rises, but does not quite
reach the external apertiu^e. Passing through the lower boundary of the barrel, the fine
process is continued downward into a large bag-like cell, apparently full of fluid. At the
base of this cell lies a mass of dense granidar protoplasm with a large nucleus. These bag-
like cells are of all lengths, and are supported in a framework of connective tissue, the
cells of which often appear to belong to the bags, and indeed I cannot be sure whether
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGT, VOL. VI. 47
354 MR. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
some of the nuclei in close proximity to the large nuclens just mentioned do or do not
belong to the organ under discussion or to the connective-tissue cells. Owing to the large
size of the hag-cells compared with the size of the external openings, the former are greatly-
crowded together, and at the edges of the sensory area the necks of the bags are very
long, and bend away at right angles under the cuticle (fig. 11 b). These appear to be the
commoner form in a small species (or ? young specimen) of Rhax from Tashkend.
(Figs. 11 a, 11 h, are enlarged from fig. 10.)
2. (PI. XXXII. figs. 16 a, 16 b.) A small conical pit with the base of the cone outermost,
passes at its slit-like apex into a larger conical passage, the base being in this case innermost.
I have foxind it almost impossible to decide whether the outer pits open at the surface
of the cuticle ; I am inclined to think not, but that an exquisitely fine membrane spreads
over the mouth. I have found, for instance, small bodies apparently suspended over
the mouths of the pits in a manner which is difficult to explain, except on the assumption
that they are resting on a fine membrane ; but I am not at all certain of this. Prom the
narrow slit-like apex, where the cones pass into one another, a short chitinous tube
depends, from which the soft parts are often torn away. When the soft parts are in situ,
the appearance of the whole is as shown in the figures, and perhaps corresponds with
organs described by Bertkau. The outer apertures (?) of these organs measure about
12 n across, and are found on slight eminences, comparatively speaking, rather far apart.
They seem to be always present in limited numbers, generally along the outer edges of
the sensory areas under discussion. In fig. 12 a row" of them occurred along the left edge
of the dotted area, and on the right a few w^ere found even among the hairs. They
occurred also in the section fig. 10.
3. Smaller conical pits (whether with or without membranous covers I have again
failed to decide) which pass very rapidly into a slit-like canal within the cuticle ; this
again rapidly changes into a tube of varying length which runs down freely among the
soft tissues subjacent to the cuticle. These pits seldom aj)pear circular when they reach
the outer surface of the cuticle ; they look, on siu'face view, heart-shajied, leaf-shaj)ed,
sometimes oval. They occur in great numbers (fig. 12), and, according to Bertkau,
are occasionally so numerous that their apertures (?) seem to run together to form
small common depressions.
The exact details of the proximal ends of these organs I have been unable to make
out. The appearance is as if the soft parts had been crowded away from the cuticle,
with which, therefore, they remain connected by means of long tubes. These tubes
show remarkable modifications just before reaching their proximal oi'gans. Some of
Bertkau's figures appear to refer to the same, and give fairly well the general appearance
of the whole structure. Pigs. VI a & VI h give their appearance (seen by an oil
immersion in optical section on the limb, fig. 12), but I am as uncertain whether
I have interpreted the details correctly as I am as to what the functions of these
organs may be. In these figures (17 a, 17 b) it seems as if the jirotoplasmic process
running from the large bag-like terminal cell had been ruptured before it reached the
tube to the cuticle. I failed here also to make out for certain the position and character
of the nuclei of the bog-cells.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 355
These last-described organs, which ajipear to be the commonest forms, were not found
on the first leg of the small llhax above referred to (PI. XXXII. fig. 10).
Lyriform Organs. — I have been able to confirm Hansen's description (33) of the
group of slit-like markings at the ventral edges of the chelicerse. These were the only
organs of the kind Hansen succeeded in finding in the Galeodida?. I have also
accidentally found an isolated lyriform organ among the hairs on the ventral side of
the first leg of a Galeudes. I have made no special search for them. What these
organs are, morphologically and physiologically, is at present imknown. I would
suggest their probable derivation from setal pores.
As evidence iu favour of this explanation of tlie lyriform organs, the following points deserve
attention : —
1. These lyriform organs, when simple, not only agree in size with the setal pores, but also show the
same variations in this respect as do the setal pores.
2. They occur singly or iu scattei'ed groups, the individual members of which either vary or agree in
size, or, lastly, in closely-arranged groups.
3. They occur in jjlaces where hairs generally occur or might be expected to occur, and often among
the hairs. In the latter case their size agrees well with that of the adjacent setal pores.
4. They sometimes appear to run iu rows parallel with rows of hairs, and where they occur it looks
as if a row of hairs was wanting.
Iu addition to these arguments, I would point to the pores which appear to open at and round the
tips of the mandibles of Gal codes. These seem to be open, owing, perhaps, to the wearing away of the
hard outer layer of the cuticle ; and if so they may account for the poisonous character attributed by
many persons to their bite. These pores are certainly setal.
There is no inherent difficulty iu this suggestion ; as a seta aborts, the pore with the nerve which
once ran to the seta might jjersist and be adapted for other purposes.
On the other hand, however, I have found " lyriform organs ■" which have not so arisen. On
the coxa of the last leg of a small Tliehjphonus , zigzag cracks occur iu the thick chitin, many in
the shape of an open W. Setfe often occurred near them. Close examination showed that iu the
angles of the zigzag came the corners of the polygonal cells of the tesselated hypodermis. These organs,
then, were merely slits iu the chitin between the seereting-cells. I could see the nerve-fibres running
among the hypodermis cells, but the chitin of these slits was so dense and refractive that it was
impossible to see whether a nerve came to the surface between them or not. I think it is almost
certain that they are sensory organs of some, perhaps very simple, kind.
These organs, which certainly do not rise from setal pores, do not alter my view that the ordinary
lyriform organ with a cylindrical channel through the chitinous cuticle, as occurring on the underside
of the chelieer?e of Galeodes, did arise in the way above suggested.
VIII. The Alimentary Canal.
The Mouth and Q^sojjhagus. — The mouth, as has already been described, is situated at
the end of a beak, and is guarded by an elaborate sieve-like arrangement of bristles
(PI. XXVII. fig. 11, PI. XXVIII. figs. 5, 6). It opens into a long oesophagus, which
runs through the beak and passes through the ganglionic mass to enter the mid-gut.
Within the beak the oesophagus, which in transverse section is triangular with the apex
pointed downwards (PI. XXVIII. fig. 3), can be alternately expanded and contracted, by
means of a system of radiating and circular muscles, making thereby a sucking-apparatus
47*
356 ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
of considerable length. This sucking-apparatus is therefore anterior to the brain. On
reaching the central nervous mass, the oesophagus narrows, and its musculature is
apparently confined to a layer of circular fibres, which are continued along the whole
length. After passing through the nervous mass, it widens again, to end posteriorly in a
blind corner (PI. XXXI. fig. 5). The opening into the mid-gut is situated on the dorsal
surface of the oesophagus (PL XXXI. tig. 1). No salivary glands enter this oesophagus.
The specialization of a portion of the CEsophagus into a sucking-apparatus is common to all Arachnids,
but a comparison of its position in the different forms leaves little doubt that in Galeodes we find the
primitive condition. We find, for instance, the pumping-apparatus contained in a beak in such widely
different groups as Galeodes, Thelyphonus *, and Gamasus among the Acarids. The Pseudoscorpions
also have a beak, but the sucking-apparatus is condensed at its posterior end, although still anterior to
the brain (PL XXVIII. fig. 10). In the Scorpions, in which the beak is much modified, and in the
Phalangidse, the sucking-apparatus or its homologue is also in front of the brain. But in these cases the
shifting backward of the mouth and the shortening of the beak have also shortened the sucking-
aiDparatus. In Phrynus the beak is aborted, and part of the sucking-apparatus is in front of, and part
behind, the braia (PI. XXVIII. fig. 7) The Spiders have the sucking-apparatus posterior to the brain,
although a few expanding muscle-fibres still remain in front of the brain (fig. 8) . In this case, that portion
of the oesophagus which projects backward beyond the central nerve-mass is very considerable. The
shifting back of the poi'tion specialized for sucking is no doubt to be traced to the shifting backward of
the mouth, which goes furthest in the Spiders t-
Specialization of the oesophagus itself seems to have gone furthest in some Phalangids, in which the
portion of it posterior to the brain is developed into an enormous " crop.''
I know of no salivary glands in the Arachnids. The single pair of mid-gut diverticula in front
of the diaphragm in Scorpio have been usually taken for such glands, but this is incorrect, the epithelium
of this first pair of diverticula not differing in any essential from that lining the following (so-called
" liver ") diverticula.
This absence of salivary glands in the Arachnids is perhaps to be explained in the following way : —
In the Insecta, where the mandibles and maxillifi have been much reduced and highly specialized as
organs of mastication, grouped closely round the mouth, the acicular glands (from which I would deduce
the salivary glands as well as the spinning-glands and tracheae) might easily be specialized as secreting-
glands opening within the oral aperture. But in the Arachnids, where the first pair of limbs, and later
the second also, are primarily highly-developed seizing-organs (the cheliceree being typically 3-jointed,
the pedipalps 6-jointed), and where there is typically no attempt to group them closely around and within
the oral aperture as masticatory organs, the absence of salivary glands is what we might expect. It is
true, the basal joints of the pedipalps of the Spiders have been secondarily developed as a pair of
mouth-organs ; but they are not chewing-jaws. In this case, it is of great interest to find that groups
of glands which are probably derivatives of setiparous glands J have been modified to form the so-
called " maxillary " glands, whose function, however, is not yet clear.
This complete absence of chewing-jaws round the mouth in Arachnids (except, according to Mr.
Michael, in some Acari) is closely associated with their method of feeding. The Arachnids suck in
liquid food by means of their pumping-apparatus. The chelicerse and pedipalps are variously specialized
in order to crush the juices out of prey close in front of the mouth. This method of feeding has had
* Galeodes and TJieh/pJioiiiis are, however, connected by Sc7iho)wtus,
t Stecker, in his paper on Gihhocellum, figures the mouth behind the basal joints of the pedipalps. This is such
an obvious error that one can hardly help taking it for a misprint.
X Cf. figs, in Schimkevitch, ' Anatomie de I'Epeire' (62),
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 357
far-reaching consequcuces, and^ indeed, we owe to it the special morjjliology of the group, viz. : the
character and position of the anterior seizing-limbs, and the division of the body into an anterior loco-
motory region and a posterior highly distensible food-bag.
In adaptation to this liquid food we have apparatus (1) for preventing the escape of the juices crushed
out in front of the mouth, and (2) for straining them so that no solid matter finds its way into the
alimentary system.
Special Apparatus for conducting and straining juices. — The juices flowing from
the wound made by the chelicerte are conducted towards the tip of the beak by
bushy rows of jilumose hairs Avhich run along the digits of the chelicerge on their
inner sides. The juices are strained by the sieve-like arrangement at the tip of the beak
already described (PI. XXVIII. fig. 6). In one of my series of sections, the outside of
this sieve is thickly covered witli moth's feathers and scales. A few of these were also
found in the digestive tubules, and in each case embedded in small masses of blood-
plasma, which, apparently on account of their presence, had not been taken in and turned
into food-globules by the digesting-cells (i i).
Thelyphonus also has a beak, but it is enclosed between the basal joints of the pedipalps, which are
fused below it, but are open above it (PI. XXVIII. fig. 12) . The ehelicerte crush the prey into the channel
thus formed by the coxse of the pedipalps, and the juices are drawn in by the powerful pumping-
apparatus. They are strained by transverse rows of fine hairs, which line the aperture (figs. 12, 13, st).
In Phrynus the pedipalps are not fused below, but their inner faces are covered with fine hairs and
they can be apposed. Their upper inner faces are provided with specialized " gutters," i. e. one on each
side, for conducting the juices to the mouth, as Gaubert (32) has already pointed out.
The Phalangidse are also said (McLeod) to have similar gutters, or, as they have been somewhat
inappropriately called, " pseudotrachese." In Scorpio, the coxse of the pedipalps, which are generally
adapted among the Arachnids to prevent the escape of fluids, have been forced apart by the squeezing
forward of the two following coxie, which, again, may have been forced forward by the anterior translocation
of the genital aperture. To prevent the escajje of juices, therefore, processes of the coxae of the first and
second pairs of legs have developed forward, and together form a sort of spoon-like structure under the
mouth (PI. XXVIII. fig. 9, /j) . Fine hairs prevent the juices from escaping between these coxal processes,
and a pair of "gutters" [Euscorpw] conduct back any which happen to be escaping in that way
(PI. XXVII. fig. 9 6,^).
The Spiders apparently apply the oral aperture to the wound in the prey, the dense tufts of hairs
on the parts bordering the mouth and on the coxai of the pedipalps hindering the escape of the juices.
The sti-aining-apparatus is very highly developed. The entrance to the oesophagus between the labrum
and labium is a long transverse slit provided with transverse rows of fine straining-hairs ; between these
rows of hairs are gutters sloping upward and inward to open, in some cases, through windows into a
central gutter which itself gradually widens into the cesophagus proper. The latter is prevented from
collapsing under the powerful sucking-action by its solid chitinous dorsal wall.
The only exception I know to this order of things is the case of an unknown Phalangid (already
mentioned), which I cut in sections for some special purpose, and found, to my astonishment, that behind
the brain the oesophagus formed a large muscular ' crop ' which was full of solid particles. As there
were none in the stercoral pocket, I presume that this is some special arrangement of the sucking-apparatus,
and that the solid matter is again ejected through the mouth.
The Mid-gut. — The oesophagus, in Galeodes, is not in a continuous straight line with
the mid-gut, but doubles back slightly on itself, so that, with the mid-gut, it form.s an
S-shaped bend (PI. XXXI. fig. 5), the lower loop of which gives rise to the blind pocket
358 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
above described. This bend in tbe oesopbagais may perhaps be an indication of the
compression of the first three segments.
The mid-gvit itself pursues a straight course backward to the commencement of the
hind-gut. It is lined, apparently throughout, by an epithelium of cylindrical cells, which
vary in depth in different parts (PI. XXXIII. figs. 10, 11) ; they are specially long just
before reaching the hind-gut.
In nearing the diaphragm, the canal narrows considerably, and in passing through it,
its lumen is very small (PI. XXXIII. fig. 1, and also figs. 2, 3, 4, Avhich are drawn to scale).
After passing the diaphragm, the lumen increases greatly in size, and then gradually
narrows again in the 4th abdominal segment, remaining narrow until it joins the hind-
gut (PI. XXXIII. figs. 1 & 5).
The mid-gut of Galeodes, as of all Arachnids, is supplied with diverticula for the
reception of the liquid food. These originally segmental diverticula were, in their
simplest condition, probably inherited structures. It is not impossible that there is some
relation between their present enormous development in the abdomen, where they fill up
every available space, and the pumping-apparatus — that is, the latter may have helped to
sjiecialize the former by its force-pump action.
Por convenience, we divide these diverticula into two groups, the cephalothoracic and
the abdominal, although, morphologically, they belong to one and the same series. But,
while the diverticula in the muscular cephalothorax show signs of degeneration, those in
the abdomen, which is specialized into a distensible sac, are, as stated, developed to an
astonishing extent {cf. PI. XXXII. fig. 18 with PI. XXXIII. fig. 5).
The Cephalothoracic Diverticula. — In the cephalothorax, the mid-gut of Galeodes gives
off four pairs of thin diverticula towards the four pairs of legs : the two anterior pairs do not
run into the legs themselves, and are apparently atrophying ; they are often found folded
back upon the gut (PL XXXII. fig. 18). The two posterior pairs penetrate into the limbs
as far as into the trochanter. These two usually have a branch about halfway down their
lengths. This tendency to branch in the posterior cephalothoracic diverticula is interesting
as leading on to the highly-branched diverticula in the abdomen. The anterior segments
of the body were here again clearly those first specialized. These cephalothoracic
diverticula are provided with powerful circular (cm) and longitudinal fibres (PI. XXXII.
fig. 19, Im).
These four pairs of diverticula, running towards or into the four legs, seem very typical of Arachnids,
being found in Galeodes, the Spiders, Phrynus, Thehjphonits (Laurie), and Phcdanyium (Blanchard),
and lead us to conclude that in the primitive form the CES0j)hagus ran through two segments, while in
the 3rd segment the mid-gut commenced, sending out lateral diverticula in this and in the following
three segments, omitting for the moment all mention of tlie abdominal diverticula.
That these diverticula were originally separated one from another by dorso-ventral muscles we have
sufficient evidence. Although, in Galeodes, these muscles in the cephalothorax are no longer, with
certainty, recognizable {cf. supra, p. 336), in the Spiders we have the dorsal suspensors of the endo-
sternite regularly separating the diverticula ; the same is apparently the case in Phrynus and Thehjjihonus.
In those Arachnids in which there are no longer the four typical cephalothoracic diverticula, as
Scorpio and Chernes, this is due to secondary reduction. In the former case [Scorpio) it must be
accounted for by the extraordinary longitudinal compression of the cephalothorax. Instead of the
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 359
typical four pairs of diverticula, we find in Scorpio only one pair, which have often been taken for
salivary glands.
In the Pscudoscorpions also there is only one pair of diverticula in the cephalothorax, but m these
animals the diverticula are not so specialized ; they are only shallow lateral outpushings of the mid-gut,
which might easily run into one another, so that the segmental divisions may have become obliterated.
Passing on from tliese four pairs of diverticula, the last two, as above stated, shomng a
tendency to branch, we find in Galeodes, immediately in front of the diaphragm, numerous
small branched accessory diverticula (PI. XXXII. fig. 18, ad), resembling those behind the
diaphragm. These are interesting, as they seem to show the action of the pumping-
apparatus in causing diverticula to appear irregularly, w^herever, in fact, there is room
among the tissues for their development.
Behind the diaphragm, the whole cavity of the abdomen which is not occupied by the
genital glands, the stercoral pocket, tracheae, &c. is filled to distension witli diverticula.
The Abdommal Diverticnia. — The abdominal diverticula are hooped by fine circular
muscles, like those of the cephalothorax. These circular fibres are 4-5 ju apart in the
contracted normal condition of the diverticulum, -with the epithelium in situ, but 8-15 ^
apart in distended diverticula, with the epithelium disorganized by food {of. ii).
The distinction often drawn between the mid-gut diverticula in the cephalothorax and
the " liver " diverticula in the al)domen is erroneous. As I have shown elsewhere (il),
the epithelium of these diverticula throughout the w'hole mid-gut from the posterior
end of the oesophagus to the commencement of the hind-gut is essentially similar, and
is throughout digestive in its function. The differences which appear in the epithelia of
the cephalothoracic portions of the mid-gut and of the abdominal are not differences in
kind ; they are due to the fact that the latter have far more food pumped into them to
digest. The diverticula throughout the Arachnida are typically mere extensions of the
digestive surface, and are nowhere converted into hepatic or pancreatic glands.
This uniformity of the epithelium in the diverticula throughout the whole alimentary canal is true of
Galeodes, the Spiders *, Scorpio, and Cherries. Lavirie ('47) claims a difference between the epithelium
of the cephalothoracic and abdominal diverticula in Thelyphonus. I would suggest that the difference
noticed by him is accidental, and due chiefly, as above suggested, to the state of the contents and
consequent activity of the cells. 1 can see no essential difference between the two in my own sections of
Thelyphonus.
It is a difficult and tedious oj)eration to dissect out the connections of the diverticula
with the central canal in the abdomen. I do not believe that any clear idea of the
arrangement of the diverticula can be obtained in this way. It was only after carefully
reconstructing serial sections of the abdomen tliat the foUoAving remarkable arrangement
was discovered.
As shown in PI. XXXIII. fig. 1 {cf. also the section fig. 4), close behind the diaphragm,
a large group of diverticula open into the alimentary canal on each side somewhat dorsally.
There is no difficulty in finding the apertures of these diverticula in sections, on accoimt
of their size and importance.
* In the Spiders there appear to bo a few highly-specialized cells scattered irregularly in the epithelium of the
.abdominal diverticula, which are not simply digesting-cells.
300 ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
There is no other opening into the central canal. For a long time I was convinced
that a second pair of apertures existed in the 7th segment. A great accumulation of
faeces (PI. XXXIII. fig. l,f) is frequently found ovitside the central canal, far hack, near
the stercoral pocket, hut in adjacent diverticula. This, I concluded, must pass into the
hind-gut ^^itliout having to travel forward again all the way to the 1st segment. But
fresh series of sections have shown that there is no entrance here into the mid-gut.
Behind this anterior pair of openings the tuhules which fill up the ahdomen open into
two lateral canals, which run backward more or less symmetrically from the anterior pair
of openings to nearly the end of the body (PI. XXXIII. fig. 1). The tubular diverticula
opening into these lateral canals show no regular arrangement, but branch out dorsally
and ventrally, /. e. above and below the great tracheal trunks which run along outside the
lateral canals (PI. XXXIII. fig. 5). They are arranged in irregular groups, alternating with
tufts of branches from the main tracheal trunks. In distended animals, the diverticula
hang down on each side of the great medio-ventral blood-sinus, which is continuous with
the neural aperture through the diaphragm (PL XXXIII. figs. 3, 4, n, and PI. XXXIV.
fig. 8, vs). This blood-space is especially large under the stercoral pocket in such cases,
and is here often found filled with a sohd mass of coagulum.
The lateral canals run outside the series of dorso-ventral muscles. Posteriorly, they
are applied in a remarkable manner to the end of the mid-gut, being bound together
over it and under it by muscle-bands. The arrangement is seen in PI. XXXIII. figs. 1
& 7. "Where the lateral canal at this place is in contact with the mid-gut, its epithelium
is modified into a kind of supporting tissue (fig. 7, inep). It appears as if each cell had
become vacuolated, while its wall stiffened. Between this curious supporting epithelium,
and the actual wall of the mid-gut is a layer of fine blood-lacunae with coagulum, granules
(? digested matter), trachese, and {V) cells. It is in this part of the lateral canal that the
accumulations of faeces above mentioned are found (/), which led me at first to believe
that there must be an opening here into the mid-gut {mg).
These lateral canals, therefore, supply a means of constricting the mid-gut just anterior
to its entrance into the hind-gut. The muscle-bands {tm) binding the two above
and below the mid-gut are connected by means of the rigid-looking, highly modified
epithelial cells of the inner walls of the lateral canals. The muscles with these epithelia
form a hoop round the end of the mid-gut. Some power of constricting the mid-gut
at this place is, as we shall sec, a necessary adaptation to the Arachnidan method of
feeding.
The number and arrangement of the abdominal diverticula ia other Arachnids are of great interest,
inasmuch as they were originally segmentally arranged.
Scorpio. — We find^ in serial sections as well as in dissection, five pairs of primary diverticula
leaving the central canal at regular intervals in the first five segments of the abdomen. As with the
first pair in Galeodes, these diverticula open into the mid-gut latero-dorsally. From their openings
into the mid-gut, the diverticula immediately branch out in all directions, forming the compact lobes of
the so-called liver. These lobes are strictly segmental, and are separated from each other by the dorso-
ventral muscles (PL XXXIV, fig. 1, dvm). The fifth pair of lobes run backward, filling up the rest of
the distensible portion of the abdomen.
In this regular serial alternation of the diverticula with the dorso-ventral muscles, Scorpio has
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 361
undoubtedly retained a primitive feature which has been lost in Galeodes. Before connecting the two
forms, we will describe the coTiditioii in the Thelyphonidie and Pseudoscorpions.
Thelyphonidce. — As Laurie has described (47), there are four pairs of diverticula from the central canal,
alternating regularly with the dorso-ventral muscles. The fourth pair stretches back on each side inside
the rows of dorso-ventral muscles, and is itself constricted by them, while the central canal becomes
transformed into what is functionally a hind-gut (PL XXXIV. fig. 2).
Pseudoscorpions. — The canal gives off one median ventral and two lateral diverticula in the first
segment ; the latter run backward on each side of the central canal and are regularly constricted by
the dorso-ventral muscles (PI. XXXIV. fig. 3).
I have placed these four types of the alimentaiy canal side by side in PI. XXXIV. : Scorpio fig. 1,
Thehjphonus 2, Galeodes 4, and Chernes 3.
From the segmental character of the diverticula separated from each other by dorso-ventral muscles,
we are, I think, justified in assuming that in the primitive form there were originally at least seven
pairs in the abdomen before reaching the chitin-lincd hind-gut, which appears to have begun between
the 7th and 8th segments. We should then have the primitive arrangement, consisting of seven pairs of
diverticula separated from one another by six pairs of dorso-ventral muscles. I have shown this hypo-
thetical primitive condition in fig. 5 and also, slightly altered, in PI. XXXIII. fig. 12.
To what are we to attribute these various modifications of the primitive segmental arrangement ? It
is at once apparent that in all cases the posterior diverticula degenerate, while the few anterior diverticula
which persist are of increased size and importance. We shall not be far wrong if we see in them
various adaptations to the method of feeding. I would throw out the following suggestion.
The forcing of the liquid food into the alimentary system has to be regulated, otherwise it would be
driven straight out through the hind-gut and anus. W^e accordingly find the central canal so narrowed
in its course that masses of fseces could easily be utilized to stop the passage. Thus the food would
tend to be pumped chiefly into the anterior diverticula, which would become highly developed, while the
posterior would degenerate. The longer the liind-gut is, the further back would such stoppage occur, and
the greater the number of the diverticula which could develop. Hence the great number in Scorpio.
In Galeodes, where the dorso-ventral muscles, meeting ventrally in the middle line, are near together, the
greatly enlarged antci'ior diverticula grew backward outside them ; but in Thelyphonus and Chernes these
muscles are wide enough apart to allow the anterior diverticula to grow backward between them
alongside of the central canal.
Phrynus is said to have four pairs of abdominal diverticula. I can find only three pairs ; the arrange-
ment in other respects closely resembles that of Thelyphonus, the smaller number of diverticula being
perhaps connected with the shortening of the hind-gut by the loss of the tail.
There seems to be great difference of opinion as to the number of abdominal diverticula in the
Spiders. Wasmann (74 a) figures two pairs in Myyale. Bertkau, who studied this subject with
great care, concluded that, in addition to certain small diverticula, entering irregularly into the central
canal immediately behind the waist, there are five primary diverticula — a median ventral, which may
compare with the median ventral diverticulum in the Chernetidse, and two pairs of lateral. These
median ventral diverticula may perhaps be treated as accessory outgrowths of the mid-gut due to the
action of the force-pump arrangement of the oesophagus *.
In the Phalangidse and Acari we have altogether different conditions. In the former we have a
reduction to six abdominal segments, and in the Acari very variable reduction — in some cases the
abdomen consists of only three segments t- We should therefore hardly expect abdomiual diverticula
to be developed in such cases.
* Bertkau (16) caUs these diverticula " glands," under the influence of the old name, the " liver."
t Ixodes, which has carried the distensibility of the abdomen to an extreme, develops 10 segments, which, as in
the Spiders, early become obscured : Wagner (73).
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 48
362 ME. H. M. BEENARD O^' THE
For a comparative account of tlie epithelium lining these digestive diverticula and of the " peritoneal "
cells covering them externally, which latter are generally ahseut in Galeodes, occurring only here and
there, hut are common to all other Arachnids, cf. " Notes on some of the Digestive Processes in the
Arachnids," Journ. Royal Microsc. Society, 1893.
The Malpig-hian tubules open into the mid-gut in the 4th segment, where the gut
narrows (see PL XXXIII. fig. 1, and the section on excretion, p. 380).
T/ie Hind-gut and Stercorcd Pocket. — The passage from the mid- to the hind-gut
takes place in the region of the 7th segment ; it can easily be made out in sagittal sections
of distended specimens. The long club-shaped cells suddenly cease, and the chitin-lined
hind-gut commences (PL XXXIII. figs. 8, 11). The posterior portion of this hind-gut is
specialized into Avhat is called a stercoral pocket, which is simply a great enlargement of
its dorsal wall. In the contracted condition of the abdomen it reaches far forward, but
much less so when the abdomen is distended.
In order to increase the surface of the stercoral pocket in Galeodes, its wall is thrown
into elaborate folds, between which the faecal masses are pressed, having, as I have shown
elsewhere (ii), digestible material absorbed out of them. Great masses of faeces are
retained in this pocket for such final absor2:»tion. I have only seen traces of an extremely
thin tesselated epithelium on the outer side (i. e. on the side tow^ards the body-cavity) of
the thin chitinous membrane, with minute, rather closely arranged nuclei. In addition
to this epithelium, there is a thin layer of muscle-fibres, but their exact distribution
round tlie jiocket is very difficult to make out ; I could find no such regular basket
arrangement as that figured by Dufour (31).
Purther, when we remember that many of these animals live on scorching sands, where
an economy of fluid matter is a necessary condition of existence, Ave may well believe
that one function of this hind-gut is to dehydrate the faeces *.
The anus is a large median slit, sometimes placed ventrally {Mhaa;), but, as a rule,
posteriorly, in the anal segment.
The great variation in the hind-gut of Arachnids is a point of no small interest.
The Spiders have the posterior abdominal segments much shortened; hence \ie find the stercoral
pocket developed dorsally, as in Galeodes, as a receptacle for the fseces f.
In Scorjj'/o the hind- gut, commencing in the region of the 7th segment, runs through the long
specialized tail-segments as a straight tube, showing no enlargement as a stercoral pocket.
In Chernes we seem to have a long coiled hind-gut, showing further a slight enlargement anterior to
the anal aperture.
In Tliehjphonus, the hind-gut runs through the three tail-segments as a thin tube, while an anterior
enlargement functions as stercoral pocket. The greater part of this enlargement appears to me to
be chitin-lined, the chitin commencing a little behind the entrance of the Malpighian tubules
* It has long been recognized that this is a conspicuous function of the mammalian hind-gut {cf. Edkins, Journ.
of Physiol, vol. i, p. 459).
t Kischinouye (40) claims that the stercoral pocket of the Spiders is of mesodermal origin, and Laurie (47)
that that of Phrynvs is cndodermal. In view of the presence of a chitin-lined hind-gut in Oalcodes, Scorpio, and
Thehjiihonus reaching, at least in the two former, to the 7th abdominal segment, I think there must have been some
error in interpreting the phenomena {cf. note, p. 380).
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 363
(PI. XXXIV. fig. 2). As in the hind-gut of Galeodts, tlie chitinous wall is thrown into countless folds,
which are found caked with coagulum, and thus much obscured. Laurie attributes tlie whole of this
stercoral pocket to the mid-gut.
In Phryniis, my sections (not very well preserved) seem to show a similarly sudden change in the
7th segment, from mid-gut to hind-gut, as is seen in Galeodes.
The relative lengths (measured iu segments) of the different portions of the alimentary canal in the
ancestral Arachnid may be stated as follows : —
The oesophagus ran through two segments.
The mid-gut had originally four pairs of segmental diverticula in the cephalothorax (reduced to
one pair in Scorpio and C/iernes), and presumably seven pairs in the abdomen. It thu.s ran through
eleven segments. We shall see further (footnote, p. 307) that there is reason to believe that there
were originally 12 pairs of diverticula.
The hind-gut, therefore, ran from the 14th or 15th segment to the end of the body^ and has been
variously specialized in adaptation to the progressive shortening of the abdomen.
Eevii'w of the Alimentary System. — In endeavouring to understand these variations in the morphology
of the alimentary canal in the Arachnids, we have to ajjpeal to its physiology.
The typical food of the Arachnids is essentially fluid, i. e. the body-juices sucked from prey seized,
held, and crushed in front of the beak or mouth. These juices are, in nearly all cases, carefully
strained by special apparatus in front of or in the mouth. By means of a special puniping-apparatus
(developed primarily iu the beak) this liquid food is forced into the mid-gut and its diverticula,
giving rise even to accessory diverticula where space among the tissiies could be found for them.
This method of filling the mid-gut with fluid requires regulation. We find, for instance, that but a
small quantity of this food runs into the ceplialotboracic diverticula, whose serious distension would
interfere with the highly-developed musculature of this region of the body. Undue distension of the
cephalothoracic diverticula is perhaps prevented by their muscular tissue (PI. XXXII. fig. 19), which
appeal's to be much more powerful than that of the abdominal diverticula. After simply filling the
cephalothoracic diverticula, the food flows on into the abdomen, where the highly specialized diverticula
are filled to their fullest capacity. Galeodidae are often found with enormous abdomens, reminding one
of females distended by eggs ; on dissection, the distension is found to be due to food. The abdomen
of Spiders can even be seen to swell while they drink ; and carmine particles mixed in the water are
found at the tips of the diverticula (Bcrtkau). Most remarkable of all, the ticks, when once attached
to a host, having practically an unlimited supply of food, distend so enormously that their skins are
specially strengthened, as much, perhaps^ to prevent them from bursting themselves as from being easily
burst by the scratching action of the host.
With regard to the mechanical movements of the distensible bag-like receptacle for the liquid food,
when there are rigid tergitcs aiul steniites, the segments telescope into each other, while latcrallv
there is a strong flexible membrane {Galeodes, Scorpio, Chernes, Pedipalpi). In the Spiders, many
Acari and Phalangids, the whole abdominal integument seems to be equally extensible. In Scorpio
only seven, and in Thelyphonus nine, segments are capable of distension [cf. PI. XXIX. fig. 14).
The constriction of the mid-gut by means of the diaphragm takes place in Galeodes [cf. PI. XXXIII.
figs. 2, 3) J Scorpio, and Spiders (PI. XXXIII. fig. 6), and very probably in all Arachnids which have
diaphragms or waists. This is an arrangement quite in keeping with the distension of the abdomen by
forcing liquid food into it by means of the pumping-apparatus. The constriction serves to prevent the
food from flowing back into the cephalothorax. In Galeodes and the other Arachnids with the sucking-
apparatus in front of the nerve-mass, the long, narrow oesophagus, as it passes through the brain, is
supplied with circular muscles which would prevent the fluid from returning into the pumping-apparatus.
In the Spider Lycosa, and, according to Schimkevitch, in Epeira, there is a W'Cll-developed sphincter
364 MR. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
for constricting the passage immediately behind the sucking-apparatus. In the Spiders the constriction
by the muscles in the waist must therefore be primarily to relieve the cephalothoracic diverticula from
pressure when the abdomen is fully distended.
We can thus understand the progressive rudiraentatiou of the cephalothoracic diverticula seen in
many Arachnids. Their presence is more or less a hindi'ance to the musculature, which is as highly
specialized in the thorax as the mid-gut is in the abdomen. Further, the comparatively feeble develop-
ment of the epithelia of the cephalothoracic diverticula is, as above suggested, referable to the limited
amount of food which they receive.
One further arrangement is necessary, and this is to prevent the liquids being forced through the
central canal of the mid-gut into the hind-gut or stercoral pocket. As the pressure must be very great
to drive the food to the tips of the innumerable diverticula, distending them to their utmost, there
must be some arrangement to keep it from escaping into the hind-gut.
In Galeodes, we find (PL XXXIII. fig. 1) that the central canal narrows greatly in the fourth
abdominal segment. Here, then, the canal might be constricted, perhaps by its own circular muscles,
especially if fsecal masses were present and helped to choke up the passage (in fig. 5 two masses of fseces
are seen in the passage). In this way, it is obvious that the food would be driven most easily into the
anterior pair of openings, and from these, along the lateral canals, into the diverticula. We find a
similar narrowing of the canal in Thelyphonus , sufficient, if faeces were present, to force the fiuid to the
end of the persistent lateral diverticula. Further, the singular arrangement above described, and shown
in PI. XXXIII. fig. 7, is clearly for constricting the extreme end of the mid-gut. In hungering and
contracted specimens we find the end of the mid-gut closed by folds of the hind-gut (fig. 9) .
In Scorpio, the fresh liquid food is probably prevented from escaping posteriorly by muscular
constriction of the hind-gut, assisted by the presence of faecal masses in the central canal. In a small,
contracted specimen of Euscorpio, I found that the canal, at the junction of the mid- and hind-guts, made
a loop which would assist in arresting the progress of fluid.
In the Pseudoscorpions, the fluid would be readily pumped into the large primary diverticula. The
long narrow hind-gut is generally filled with faeces.
The Fceces. — The waste products of digestion, the fsecal " crystals," which, as I have
shown (it), are substantially identical in all Arachnids, would find their way back from
the anterior diverticula straight into the central canal, in which faecal masses are found
in considerable quantities. Posteriorly to this first and only pair of apertures, however,
the fgeces must travel forward along the lateral canal to the anterior opening. The
raising of the abdomen at right angles to the body might perhaps assist in
bringing the faeces forward towards these apertures ; but how the fseces themselves
travel up those diverticula which depend on each side of the body (PI. XXXIII. fig. 5) is
a problem which I have been entirely unable to solve. The difficulty becomes still
greater when the epithelial cells leave the walls of the diverticula, the tips of which become
mere bag-like receptacles for fsecal crystals. The circular muscles, which are easily
demonstrable, may perhaps bring about some kind of peristaltic action. If longitudinal
muscles are also present on the abdominal diverticula, as they are on the cephalothoracic,
the process would be facilitated.
This problem presents itself in all Arachnids : How do the faeces find their way from the tips of
the diverticula back into the central canal? The Spiders appear partly to have given up the attempt,
and some pi'oportiou of the fscal " crystals " appear to pass out through the walls of the diverticula
(especially at their tips), and are apparently carried away by the Malpighian vessels (i i).
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^,. 365
IX. The Heart and the Circulation.
The Dorsal Vessel. — The dorsal vessel, or heart, of Galeodes is a long tube extending;
from about the 4th or 5th segment anteriorly to the 13th posteriorly. It is extremely
delicate, and, for the size of the animal, unimportant, this fact being attributed, according
to the well-known principle, to the great development of the tracheal respiratory
system.
In spite, however, of tliis feeble development of the dorsal vessel in Galeodes, it
has retained certain primitive featui-es, viz., great length and a great number of ostia,
viz. eiglit pairs — two in the cephalothorax and six in the abdomen. These ostia, in
the abdomen at least, are strictly segmental and occur under the posterior third of
each tergite (PI. XXX. fig, 15), just in front of the dorso-ventral muscles. The
longitudinal section of the last chamber of a heart of a Bhax whose alimentary canal
was empty, and the abdomen consequently somewhat telescoped together, is given on
PI. XXXIV. fig. G.
In addition to these eight pairs, there appear also to be indications, viz., a swelling of
the aorta, of an extra chamber anteriorly (PI. XXXI. fig. 5, h), which would imply that
there were originally at least three pairs of ostia in the cephalothorax.
The ostia are on the dorso-lateral surface of the heart, and the valves are formed by
fine membranes attached posteriorly to the lips of the ostia and floating forwards on the
blood-stream. The lower membrane (or edge of the valve-tube) is attached anteriorly
to the floor of the chamber (PL XXXIV. fig. 6). On contraction of the heart, these
membranes would be forced up against the dorsal surface of the lumen and the aperture
would be closed.
The anterior end of the heart is produced into an aorta, which rims through the mass
of tubules developed at certain times (? or in diff'erent S2:)ecies) by the proximal ends of
the coxal glands, and apiiears to discharge the blood direct on to the central nerve-mass
(PI. XXXI. fig. 5).
The posterior opening of the heart, Avhich is valvular, the valve being formed by a
simple membranous infolding of the walls (PI. XXXIV. fig. 6), is immediately in front
of the stercoral pocket. The heart is continued into a vein, which appears to end just
behind the stercoral pocket. In transverse sections, the heart is seen to be suspended
by strands of connective tissue which, dorsally and dorso-laterally, are attached to the
body-wall, 1)ut ventrally radiate outwards on each side into i-egular wing-like arrangements
of strands, Avhich lose themselves among the digestive tubules (PI. XXXIV. fig. 8).
These wing-like strands may act as elastic expanders of the chambers of the heart ;
their chief function is, however, almost certainly to keep the heart from being too
compressed when the abdomen is tightly distended with food.
Suspended on these strands and scattered about all around the heart large cells are
fomid, the function of which I have not ascertained; they may be connective-tissue
cells specialized as reserve cells, and suggest an incipient fat body, such as is found on
each side of the heart in many Hexapoda. The heart itself is very delicate, and consists
of but a single layer (ca. 6/* thick) of striated muscles lined on the inner side by a fine
366 MR. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
refractive membrane (PI. XXXIV. fig. 6). Outside tlie heart ventrally tliere is a single
layer of nerve-fibres closely applied to it and running longitudinally (PI. XXXIV. fig. 7, n).
Thelyphonus has nine pairs of ostia, two in tlie ceplialothorax and seven ia the abdomen, with distinct
traces of an extra chamber in front.
Scorpio has seven pairs of ostia, all in the abdomen, with traces of a chamber (Newport) in the
cephalothorax.
The heart of Scorpio is thus more specialized than that of either Galeodes or Thelyphonus, i. e. it has
lost more of its primitive segmental pairs of ostia. It is fui'ther, owing probably to the localization of
the respiratory organs, much more strongly developed than that of Galeodes.
In a specimen of Euscorpio the dorso-veutral diameter of the heart was to that of the abdomen as
1 to 7; in a small Thelyjihonus the proportion is 1 to 9, wliereas in a specimen of Rhaw it is 1 to 21.
These measurements were taken between the successive pairs of ostia where the heart is a simple tube.
Further, the Rhax was fasting, so that this difference is not due to any great distension of the abdomen
on the part of the last-named.
The ostia of the heart in both Thelyphonus and Scorpio are situated, as in that of Galeodes, on its
dorsal surface ; but their valves have a more special mechanism, being apparently muscular. As in
Galeodes, the heart is prolonged anteriorly into an aorta running towards the brain and posteriorly into
a vein (? or artery) which runs into the tail.
The asj)ect of the heart, suspended by the connective-tissue strands, is very similar in the two cases.
In addition to the dorsal and lateral suspenders from the body-wall, tlie heart is powerfully expanded by
means of bundles of connective-tissue fibres, no doubt homologous with the wing-like bundles in
Galeodes. In the cases of Thelyphonus and Scorpio, however, these bundles are continued into muscle-
fibres (the veno-pericardial muscles of Lankester and Miss Beck), which run through the mass of
alimentary diverticula to be attached to the connective-tissue enveloping the lung-books. This is a
specialized mechanism to save the heart from being compressed when the abdomen is distended with food.
In view of the great specialization of the abdomen as a distensible vegetative sac, this mechanism
deserves further description.
The heart, in both Thelyphonus and Scorpio, appears to be contained in a pericardium. But the
pericardium, of Scorpio at least, is really a connective-tissue membrane embracing and binding together
the distensible diverticula of the alimentary canal in the interest of the circulation. It runs laterally
down the sides of the alimentary masses and keeps the passage open between them and the outer bodv-
wall (PI. XXXIV. fig. 9, ?w), and originally it ran also between the segmental diverticula of the mid-gut.
These latter segmental infoldings have now, however, practically disappeared, leaving interesting traces
behind. Dorsally, they still persist as deep conical pockets, into which the wing-like expanders of the
heart run to be attached by means of muscle-fibres to the ventral portion of the membrane which arches
over a blood-space. The muscle-fibres connecting these two infoldings are probably the remains of the
infolding of the mcmbi'aue between the diverticula. Into these segmentally arranged blood-spaces,
which are the ventral i-emains of the infoldings between the diverticula, the respiratory organs project.
The veno-perieardial muscles, as those muscles are called whicli mark the original inter-diverticular
blood-passages, therefore perform three functions : (1) they hold down the membrane which covers the
alimentary system and thus prevent that system, which, as we have seen, is liable at any moment to
enormous distension, from pressing on the heart ; (2) they raise the same membrane ventrally, and thus
prevent the alimentary system from pressing upon the lung-books and hindering the free circulation of
the blood along the floor of the body; and (3), being attached by means of the numerous radiating
fibres above mentioned to the heart itself, they may be active muscular expanders of the same.
A pair of these veno-pericardial muscles accompanies each pair of ostia. They run down through the
mass of digestive diverticula, close to the dorso-vcntral muscles, whicli agrees with the suggestion that
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.'E. 367
they run where there once was an inter-diverticular infolding of the membrane. I was at first inclined
to believe that they had borrowed these fibres from the dorso-ventral muscles, but now think that they are
developed out of the remains of the membrane. I am led to this belief by noticing that, in Thelyphonus,
while the dorso-ventral muscles run outside the long fourth pair of diverticula (PI. XXXIV. fig. 2),
the " veno-pericardial " muscles run iuside between these diverticula and the hind-gut, but where
segmental diverticula once existed but have now disappeared. The veno-pericardial muscles persist as
their last vestiges.
In Tfiefi/jjhoims we have two pairs of these muscles in the cephalothorax, attached ventrally to the
eudosteruite, and in the abdomen seven pairs *, raising up the membrane ventrally in each segment to
form a pair of blood-spaces. Further, in Scorpio, we also have seven pairs in the abdomen. The
morphological importance of these series of ventral blood-spaces connected by fibrous and muscular
strands with the heart, and alwnys accompanying the ostia, will be discussed in the section on rcsjiiration.
In both Scorpio and Tiiehjphonus the circulation is further specialized by the presence of short
connections between the heart and the membrane surrounding the diverticula. They are short muscular
(valvular?) funnels liy which the blood can be pumped directly under the membrane, where it can
circulate through a system of blood-spaces with thin membranous walls among the diverticula (PL XXXIV.
fig. y). There are nine pairs of these iu TheltjphoHUS. Lankester describes seven pairs ("arteries") in
Androctonus -. I have only succeeded in finding five pairs in a small Euscorpio ; there may, however, be
seven, as in Androctonua, although five is the number of alimentary diverticula which they have to supply.
In the Pseudoscorpions the heart seems to vary, according to the observations recorded, as to the number
of ostia. According to Croueberg (27), there are three jiairs ; according to Winkler, one pair j and according
to Daday (29), there are four pairs and a certain number (4) rouud a rosette-like terminal portion.
In a series of cross- sections of Obisiiim, in which the heart was well distended, it was found to commence
(from behind forward) iu about the same trausverse plane with the hind-gut (PL XXXIV. fig. 3). The
posterior aperture was very wide (36yti), and, being dorso-ventrally flattened, would, seen from above,
have a fan shape, which may be Daday's rosette. The posterior lips were irregular, which maybe due to
valvular infoldings. From the posterioi opening, the heart, suspended in the typical way, rapidly narrowed
to J- (IS/"') of its posterior width, and then widened again (20 yu.) to form one chamber. This chamber
has the typical appearance, and is fastened by the wing-like groups of fibres converging downward towards
the dorso-ventral muscle, apparently to lose themselves among the diverticula. From this point the heart
narrows to form an aorta. The whole structure is thus very minute, with, as Winkler stated, only one
pair of ostia. As in Guleudes, its insignificance peiliaps has some connection with respiration by means of
tracheiie.
In Fhrynus we have six pairs of ostia, which correspond with six pairs of abdominal ostia in Galeodes.
We find the same mechanism as in Thcli/phomis and Scorpio to protect the circulatory system from undue
pressure when the abdomen is distended, viz., the veno-pericardial muscle- strands.
The heart of the Spiders is fairly well known ; it is entirely confined to the abdomen. From it, as
iu the last three families mentioned, an anterior aorta runs into the cephalothorax. There is a highly-
developed pericardium, no doubt specialized from a membrane enveloping the alimentary system,
surrounding and protecting the heart from undue pressure when the alimentary tubules are distended
by a full meal. In some Spiders, e. g. Epcira, these tubules may eveu grow up on each side of the
pericardium so as to force it, with the heart, away from the dorsal wall f- Foi" the protection of the
heart, the pericardium is fastened back by a system of strands, which appear to lose themselves among
the alimentary tubules. There are three [Epeira) or four {Mijgale %) pairs of ostia,
* This implies that there were once at least twelve pairs of primary alimentary diverticula (see the diagram
PL XXXIII. fig. 12).
t Cf. Schimkevitch (62), pi. ii. fig. 9. t Wasmuiin (74 rr).
368 ME. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
The small one-chambered heart of some Acari can be deduced, as I have shown elsewhere, from that
of a Spider which failed to develop the full number of abdominal segments (6).
From a comparison of these hearts, we learn then that there were originally at least ten paii's of ostia
in the ancestor of the group, at least three in the cephalothorax (two persisting as functional only in
Galeodes and Thelyphunus), and seven in the abdomen (retained in full only in Thelyphonus and Scorpio) .
In the other Arachnids, varying numbers of ostia have been suppressed and the muscular heart itself
correspondingly shortened, although in all cases the aortic prolongation of the heart towards the central
nerve-mass persists. In all cases, except in Galeodes and Thelyphonus, the muscular heart is confined to
the abdomen. This connection between Thelyphonus and Galeodes is especially interesting. The two
forms are further connected, as no two other Arachnids are connected, by a transition form, Schhonotus
— at least in so far that the latter appears to have retained distinct cephalic lobes and free cephalothoracic
segments.
The Circulation. — The various developments of the heart in the Arachnids are only
understood when the circulation is taken into account. Tt is only then that we can
appreciate the intimate connection between the circulatory, the respiratory, and the
alimentary systems. None of these systems can be properly studied alone.
In Galeodes the blood, after bathing the brain and circulating in the anterior end of
the body and anterior appendages, has to pass back on its return from the anterior end
of the body towards the abdomen through an array of mviscles, large tracheal tubes, and
excretory tubules of the coxal glands. The proximal end of the last of these is sometimes
developed into a great spongy mass of tubules wiiich stretches right across the cavity of
the body behind and above the brain. PI. XXXIII. fig. o, eg, represents only a portion
of this spongy mass. Through this all the blood must filter on its retiu'n from the
anterior end of the body.
It is necessary to assume that subsidiary streams are diverted into the limbs. On
reaching the diaj^hragm, some of the blood probably rises to the dorsal surface in front
of the diaphragm, to re-enter the heart by the two pairs of cephalothoracic ostia.
The rest passes through the neural arch (PI. XXXIII. figs. 3, 4, n), bathing the large
abdominal ganglion on its way, to flow backward through the great ventral sinus
(PL XXXIV. fig. 8, vs) which stretches through the al)domen under the alimentary
canal. This sinus is bordered on each side by depending diverticula. As the anterior
part of the abdomen is much crowded with the genital organs, tracheae, and ahmeutary
diverticula, the sinus is protected by a membrane {cf. PL XXXIII. fig. 4, n), which is not
found more posteriorly. It ceases, in fact, in the 2nd segment, and the blood escapes from
the sinus in all directions between the alimentary tubules, to find its way itji dorsally, and
posteriorly round by the stercoral jjocket to the heart. In its passage through the
diverticula, it is often confined here and there to special vessels of irregular shape and
thin membranous walls, which serve probably to guide it towards parts which would
otherwise be out of the regular stream {cf. PL XXXIV. fig. 8).
The most important point which w^e notice here is the complete disorganization of the
regular segmental alimentary diverticula, with the accompanying complete obliteration
of the original inter-diverticular blood-spaces, there being no veuo-j)ericardial strands.
The atro^jhy of all the primary diverticula except the first, and its development into
a mass of branching tubules, naturally necessitated a change in the original circulation.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 369'
On reaching the median ventral blood-sinus, instead of flowing u]i between the
original inter-diverticular blood-passages, it was now required to flow through the
maze of branched tubules. Such a change as this necessarily affected the respiratory
invaginations, which originally j)rojected into these inter-diverticular blood-passages
(PI. XXXIII. tig. 12). The dispersal of these regular streams into a (Uffuse streaming
among the tubules no doubt played some part in causing the respiratory invaginations
to develop into long tubules branching freely among the tissues. The same principle
applies to the cephalothorax, where the blood-streams are much divided by the tissues
and had therefore to be sought out by the respiratory invaginations.
In Scorpio, though a certain number (5) of the primary abdominal diverticula persist, they are no
longer simple, but consist of a mass of branching tubules. This change necessarily affected both the
circulatory and the respiratory systems, in a manner, however, strikingly different from what we have
described in Gakodes, although both are but modifications of the same original system.
The blood is propelled forwards into a series of membranous sinuses closely surrounding and pene-
trating the brain. On leaving the brain anteriorly, it is conducted along apparently membranous
channels accompanying the principal nerves, both the nerves to the limbs and the long ventral ganglionic
chord. These channels are not ordinary blood-vessels, but appear to be rather guiding-membranes ;
that which accouijianies the ventral chord, however, presents remarkable histological features which show
it to be an organ of some unknown physiological significance which deserves investigation. This
remarkable channel runs dorsally to the nerve-chord, here and there sending a branch between the
chords, which opens into the ventral lacunar system. The physiological connection between this vessel
and the nerve-chords is seen at the ganglia. Over these latter the vessel spreads out and sends branches
mto their interior. The vessel then runs on above the chords to the next ganglion. The object of this
and of the other vessels accompanying nerves is apparently to pi'ovide them and the ganglia with a stream
of oxygenated blood. In Gakodes we find the nerves invariably accompanied by large trachere.
From this system of nerve blood-channels, the blood escapes into the general lacunar system of the
body, either directly or, as in the case of that accompanying the nerve to the third leg, after first passing
through the coils of the coxal glands (12), As in Galeodes, the blood passes through the neural arch
of the diaphragm and then runs along a median ventral blood-sinus (PL XXXIV. fig. 9, vs).
From this sinus it no doubt originally ran up between the primary segmental diverticula along the
dorso-veutral muscles (PL XXXIII. fig. 12) to the heart, being aerated by the respiratory invaginations.
The present segmental divisions of the abdominal alimentary system and the persistence of the veno-
pericardial strands (PI. XXXIV. figs. 1 and 9, on the left) show clearly that this primitive arrangement
persisted long enough to allow the respiratory invaginations to become highly speciaHzed. With the
increasing specialization of the distensible abdominal alimentary system, the inter-diverticular passages
became squeezed up and the blood hud to flow out laterally from the median sinus, passing across and
not along the respiratory invaginations, on their way. In adaptation to this change, the respiratory
invaginations developed in process of time a system of laminated air-chambers (the '' lung-books ").
Between these laminje (PL XXXi\. fig. 9, right) the blood, on its way up to the pericardium, would in
future have to pass. The inter-diverticular blood-passages gradually closed up, and the infolded
membrane degenerated into the strands above described, the veno-pericardial muscles (PL XXXIV.
fig. 9, left) .
This system, however, would no longer suffice when the primary diverticula broke up into branched
tubules, a change which in Scurpio proijably took place much more recently than in Galeodes. Each of
these alimentary tubules must be supplied with blood. It is obvious that they cannot receive it, as they
do in Galeodes, from the stream flowing along the ventral median sinus, for in Scorpio all this blood is
SECOND SEllIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 49
370 MR. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
required to flow laterally through the specialized luugs. The blood for the digestive tubules is received
direct fi-om the heart. On each contraction of the heart the blood is forced, through several pairs of
latero-ventral openings (Lankester, "arteries" in Anclroctonus) , among the alimentary tubules. At
these vents the heart is in contact with the " pericardium," so that the blood is discharged under the
latter and can only find its way back to the heart after circulating (1) through the mass of digestive
tubules, and (2) (PI. XXXIV. fig. 9, cf. arrows on the right) through the upper laminae of the lung-books,
whence it escapes into the lateral blood-passages, which convey the blood, close under the skin, to
the "pericardium." Among the digestive tubules the blood circulates freely, with, however, membranous
vessels here and there (as in Galeodes) for the purpose of guiding it to all parts.
This cannot be considered as a primitive arrangement, inasmuch as the breaking up of the primary
simple alimentary diverticula into the branching tubules must have itself been a secondary modification.
These specializations have clearly necessitated the formation of the continuous membrane round the
■whole alimentary system, which keeps the complicated streamings apart. It is this membrane which,
■where it passes under the heart, functions as a pericardium.
In the Pseudoscorpions we have an entirely different specialization ; the heart, as in all Arachnids,
propels the blood on to the brain, and after flowing among the tissues, coxal glands, spinning-glands, &e.,
in the cej^halothorax, finds its way back along the floor of the body to the abdomen. On its way it is
apparently divided into two latero-ventral streams by the development of a large median ventral diver-
ticulum of the mid-gut. Each of these streams has to pass through a felt-work of extremely fine
tracheal tubules (27 and 10), which have developed at the tips of the original simple tracheal invagination
of the 2nd and 3rd abdominal segments. The blood is thus aerated, as it flows into the abdomen, by
two pairs of specialized trachese.
Reasons have, however, already been given for believing that these posterior trachea persisted until
comparatively recently, inasmuch as we still have the seven pairs of functional inter-diverticular blood-
passages persisting along the dorso-ventral muscles (PL XXXIV. flg. 3).
The blood flowing ventrally and laterally along the abdomen finds its way up, partly through the
lateral muscle or inter-diverticular blood-passages, and partly through the coils of the hind-gut, above
the genital glands, into a dorsal median sinus, from which it is drawn by the fan-shaped posterior end of
the heart {cf. p. 367).
The circulation in the Aranese has been cai'efully studied and described by Claparede (25), and it
agrees with the scheme common to all Arachnids which we have so far described. The blood discharged
forward by the heart flows back freely through the lacunse of the cephalothorax ; passing through the
waist (there being no neural arch, as in those Arachnids which possess diaphragms), it flows on each side
of the alimentary canal (PL XXXIII. fig. 6). On reaching the abdomen a great part of it flows
immediately to right and left through the specialized lung-books of the 2nd segment (which have
been pushed forwards). The rest appears to run on, in the Tetrapneumones, to flow up through a
second pair of lungs, or, in the Dipneumones, freely through the alimentary diverticula towards the
pericardium. According to Claparede, the posterior prolongation of the heart is an artery, as may
perhaps be the case in Scorpio. In both cases I should consider it as a secondary specialization, in the
interest of the spinning-glands or tail. It may be noted that the ostia in the hearts of both the Spiders
and Scorpio would apparently admit of blood flowing either forward or backward. In Galeodes it can
flow only one way, i. e. forward ((/. PL XXXIV. fig. 6).
The Blood-corpuscles. — The blood-corpuscles are, as a rule, round cells with large
nuclei. They measure from 4- to 10 n. I have been unable to determine their origin,
as no blood-forming gland, nor any j)rocesses of division of the corj)uscles, could be
detected in my preparations.
In Scorpio the blood-corpuscles are very uniform in size and shape, ca. 8-12 fi. As one source of
these free cells, I have elsewhere (11) suggested the detached mid-gut cells, which find their way into the
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 371
liind-gut and are eitlicr lost in vast numbers or else pass out into the body through the wall of the hind-
gut. It appears to me highly improbable that these active, living, and, to the last moment, digesting
cells can be lost in such numbers, and even more unlikely that they again become epithelial cells after
travelling into the hind-gut.
This detachment of digesting-cells appears to be very general among Arachnids, altliough I have
found no cells in the stercoral pockets either in Galeodes or the Spiders. Whether in these animals
also they become blood-cells or, after digesting their food contents, are themselves rejected with the
faeces, is a matter deserving investigation. In Thehjphonus, I have noticed large, clear, nucleated cells
in the blood-plasm in the heart, which are much larger than the ordinary blood-ccUs ; perhaps these
were mid-gut cells escaped through the wall of the hind-gut.
X. PtESPIRATORY SYSTEM.
ResiDiratiou in the Galeodicliie is effected by means of tracheal tubes ramifying among
the tissues. These open to the exterior through three pairs of stigmata, and, in some
cases, through an extra median stigma (PI. XXX. fig. 13).
The Stigmata. — The first pair open behind the coxae of the second pair of legs (on the
4th segment). It is protected by an elaboi-ate arrangement of setfe forming tree- and
bush-like fringes, which allow the air to pass in while barring the entrance against foreign
particles (PI. XXX. fig. 18). Some of the flat-headed setse shown in tliis figure within
the ajDerture, appeal- to open at their tips, and may be sensory, i. e. olfactory.
The 2nd pair of stigmata open slantingly on the 2ud abdominal segment, either under
folds of the integument, or, in a few cases, on the surface of the body, and near the
median line, while the 3rd pair open still nearer the median line. Tliese are simple
chitinous slits (PL XXX. fig. 19), being protected under folds of the skin. In the genus
Galeodes the posterior edges of these folds are furnished with remarkable rows of
bristles, the " stigmatic combs " (PI. XXIX. fig. 10, PI. XXX. fig. 16, co). These,,
perhaps, serve to keep a passage open for the air when the abdominal segments are
telescoped together.
On the 4th abdominal segment in some Galeodidse there is a single median stigma,
which often appears to be altogether closed (see the figures). It seems to l^e quite
absent in the genus Bhax.
The position of these abdominal stigmata can best be explained on the assumjitiou that
they were apertures on the posterior faces of the coxae of tlie limbs. If the limbs
of the 2nd and following abdominal segments folded back in the median line, like the
genital appendages themselves (PI. XXIX. fig. 11), the stigmata would be brouo-ht
together. This would also explain their slanting positions under folds of the integument.
The fact that, in the Galeodidfe, we actually have stigmata in the act of aborting"
on segment iv., associated with the remains of limbs closely resembling those vesti""es
of limbs which function as stigmatic opercula on segments ii. and iii., leads almost
inevitably to the conclusion that stigmata have already disappeared from between the
similar rudiments of limbs found on segments v. and vi., and perhaps also from those
still further back. That there were stigmata at least as far back as the vith abdominal
segment in Galeodes may also be inferred from tiie presence of six pairs of ostia in tlxe
abdominal portion of the heart, and six pairs of dorso-ventral muscles. These latter, as
49*
572 ME. H. M. BERXAED ON THE
we shall see further, imply at least six pairs of inter-diverticular blood-passages through
which the blood once flowed upwards to the heart (PI. XXXIII. fig. 12). There is
evidence to show that in the primitive Arachnid a pair of respiratory invaginations
projected into each of these inter-diverticular spaces, aerating the blood as it passed.
The same argument would lead us to infer that there were at one time three pairs of
stigmata in the cephalothorax, as we have one aborted and two functional cardiac
chambers. The cephalothoracic stigmata persisting in the Galeodidse would be the first
of these pairs.
A comparison o£ the stigmata of the Arachnida yields interesting results.
In Thelyphonus, which has the longest heart with traces of ten cardiac chambers, nine being still
functional, there are no stigmata now in the cephalothorax, although, if we may judge from the heart
and the veno-pericardial muscles, there were certainly three pairs, as we infer that there were in Galeodes.
Along the abdomen we have two pairs of functional stigmata, and five pairs of stigmatic scars, reaching
back to the viiith segment. These scars occur in connection with faint vestiges of limbs closely resem-
bling the similar vestiges of limbs in Scorpio (15 and PI. XXVII. figs. 16, 17). Above the first four of
these scars (as above the functional stigmata) there is a blood-space held up by a veno-pericardial muscle-
strand. This arrangement implies that there was formerly an open passage up between the segmental
diverticula of the alimentary canal to the heart. The presence of scars on the viiith segment suggests
that there was at one time an extra [i. e., 11th) pairof ostia and veno-pericardial connections which have
now vanished. Even though the stigmatic scars no longer persisted, I should have felt justified in
concluding from these points in the internal anatomy of Thelyphonus that there had at one time been
stigmata on ten segments, from the 4th cephalothoracic to the viith abdominal (PI. XXXIII. fig. 12).
While the limbs forming the genital opercula folded back on to the median line, those which followed
retained their lateral transverse positions ; we therefore have (in Thelyphonus) no approximation of the
stigmata such as we have in Galeodes {cf. PI. XXIX. figs. 11 and 13).
In Scorpio there are seven pairs of ostia and seven pairs of veno-pericardial muscles, all, owing to the
great secondary compression of the cephalothorax, confined to the abdomen. These imply again that
there were once seven open inter-diverticular passages into each of which a tracheal invagination once
projected. Four pairs of invaginations only have been retained, viz., on the 3rd to the 5th segments.
The limbs to which the stigmata belonged, though not folding back into the median line like the genital
opercula, clearly sloped backward in various degrees (PI. XXIX. fig. 12).
The Aranese oS'er, in some respects^ a curious parallel to Galeodes. There are never more than two
pairs of stigmata, viz., on the 2nd and 3rd abdominal segments. In some cases the posterior pair have
met in the middle line, which suggests that the limbs on which they occurred were also folded backward
near the middle. This is rendered stiU more probable from the fact that the spinning-mamillae, also
the remains of limbs, approximate in the middle line.
In the foregoing cases we have in all traces of the remains of stigmata on 1 1 segments, 3 cephalo-
thoracic and 8 abdominal ; some still persist, some show merely as scars, others are only inferred
from the presence of cardiac chambers and veno-pericardial muscles. Taking these systems of organs,
respiratory and circulatory, together, with perhaps the series of dorso-ventral muscles which give rise
to the inter-diverticular passages, as, owing to their close physiological connection, we are justified in
<loing, we conclude that the primitive ancestral form of the Arachnida possessed 11 pairs of primitive
respiratory invaginations, each of which projected into an inter-diverticular blood-space. The blood,
in returning along the ventral floor of the body, flowed laterally and then up along the respiratory
invaginations through the inter-diverticular passage, entering the heart by the ostium situated above each
of these passages (PI. XXXIII. fig. 12).
The various arrangements on which this scheme is founded may be best seen tabulated as follows : —
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E.
373
c.ch. = cardiac chamber.
stig. = stigmata.
v.p. = veno-pericardial muscles,
st.sc. = stigmatic scar.
lu the last column of this table I have placed the Pseudoscorpions inasmuch as they appear to stand
alone. Like Scorpio, they have lost all traces, external and internal, of the former existence of
cephalothoracic stigmata. But the compression of the segments to which the loss is attributable is quite
different in the two cases. In Scorpio, the compression was from behind forward, owing to the forward
thrust of the genital aperture ; in the Pseudoscorpions, from before backward, the four posterior limbs
having been squeezed back by the enormous coxfe of the pedipalps. In the Pseudoscorpions we have the
ram's-horn organs opening under the genital opercula, which I suggest (lo) may have been a primitive
form of tracheal invagination. In the two following segments are two pairs of highly specialized
stigmata, while on the seven following segments occurs a remarkable series of scars, a row on each side
segmentally repeating the functional stigmata, the last pair being found on each side of the anal papilla.
Internally, the heart has degenerated, but there are seven functional blood-passages running up between
the alimentary diverticula along the dorso- ventral muscles (PI. XXXIV. fig. 3).
We have then traces, either internal or external, of 11 pairs of stigmata in Thtlyphonus, 10 in the
Pseudoscorpions, 9 in Galeodes, 8 in Scorpio, ranging thus from the 4th cephalothoracic to the 10th
abdominal segment, i. e., in all in 14 segments.
We might, indeed, have inferred a priori from the traces of limbs found on all the segments of
Galeodes and (?) on the last segment in Scorpio {cf. PI. XXIX. fig. 12) that these limbs at one time
had some primitive form of trachea (or even more primitive gland from which the trachea may be
deduced) associated with them, since, in all the tracheate Arthropods, stigmata are invariably
associated with limbs.
The only segments, then, on which hitherto we have found no traces of the former occurrence of
stigmata are the three most anterior. The presence of limbs, again, suggests that there were at one
time primitive trachese or the structures out of which tracheae developed on these limbs also. Certain
Acaridse are reported to have trachete associated with the 1st pair of limbs, but there is no record of
trachese on the 2nd and 3rd segments. It will be remembered that the fusion and compression of these
three anterior segments was, according to our theory of the origin of the Arachnida, the first special-
ization of the Class, the first step in adaptation to a method of feeding which led to the differentiation
of the phylum from their Annelidan ancestors. This compression may therefore account for the
disappearance of all traces of the stigmata. (On the suggested homology of the coxal glands on the 3rd
segment with the trachete, see p. 380 and footnote.)
374 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
The Tracheal System. — The tracheal tubes of the Galeodidse form a connected system,
the segmental origin of which is obscured (PL XXX. fig. 13).
Erom each stigma of the first pair one large trunk runs forward, another upward, and
another backward. The distribution of these need not be described in detail ; it can be
o-athered in outline from the figure. It is, however, especially to be noted that the
trunk running backward branches and pierces the diapliragm, and, as shown in the
figure, is in direct connection wdth the abdominal system.
The arrangement of the latter and its connection with the stigmata can also be
gathered from a comparison of figs. 13, 14, 15 (PI. XXX.). Figures 13 and 14 were
recoustructed from both dissections and sections which were made especially to ascertain
whether there was any trace of a segmental arrangement, that is, whether there were
any remains of special tufts of tracheae in the same transverse planes witli the dorso-
ventral muscles. These muscles mark tlie positions of the original inter-diverticular
blood-spaces, into which the primitive tracheal invaginations once projected. Although
the alimentary canal is now so specialized that these spaces have quite vanished, yet it
appeared as if the tracheal tubules which are given off by the main longitudinal
trunks on each side of the alimentary canal irregularly along its whole length tended
to be rather more thickly grouped at the points where alone they are indicated in
fig. 14 *.
The pericardial trachea {pet) is connected anteriorly by a forked piece with both
longitudinal trunks, and in the 2ud segment by a large single trunk from the ti'achca
rising from the right stigma {G. arabs). Birula figures it also on the right side for
G. ater. In fig. 13 (Pi. XXX.) it is (? wrongly) drawn coming from the left side.
I have found no trace in Hhax of the aborting trachea in the fourth segment shown
in the figures of Galeodes. In other respects the systems of the two genera resemble
each other. There is, however, an additional connection in Rhax which is of some
interest. It is indicated in fig. 13 (PI. XXX.) in the 1st abdominal segment by dotted
lines, and from it one of the branches rising to the pericardial trachea seems to spring.
We appear to have here, in the 1st and 2nd segments, remains of two of the original
tracheal invaginations which once ran straight vip from the stigmata alongside the
dorso-ventral naiscles towards the heart. These presumably aerated the original inter-
diverticular blood-passages in their own segments.
In Bhax, just within the aperture of the two pairs of abdominal stigmata, the thin
chitin is strengthened by very beautiful star-like thickenings, which change gradually
into the typical hoops (PI. XXX. fig. 19).
Galeodes is the only Arachnid in which tlic primitive tracheal invagination has
developed into these long branching and anastomosing tubes. A study of the figures
shows that the Avhole system, though now highly specialized, has been developed from
the fusion of a complete series of branching tracheae arising from segmental stigmata,
commencing anteriorly in the 4th segment. We found, from our study of the circvilatory
systems in Galeodes and Thehjphomis, that we were justified in assuming such a series
for the primitive ancestral form.
* Birula (22) mentions swellings ou the main longitudinal trunk, but they do not appear to be segmentally
arranged.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 375
Other Araclmids liave tubular tracheae, hut none closely resembling those of Galeodes. As a rule the
tubular trachete arise as tufts of exquisitely fine tubules from the swollen end of a simple tracheal
invagination. These tubules do not appear as a rule to anastomose one with another. This tuft-
arrangement is a second distinct specialization of the primitive tracheal invagination.
A third equally explicable development of the primitive simple invagination is the so-called lung-book,
the origin of which was presumably as follows * : — As the alimentary diverticula became more and more
complex and distended, the inter-diverticular passages became closed. There was no mechanism which
we can see to keep tliem open. The blood, therefore, which originally flowed from the ventral sinus
up between the diverticula was compelled to flow out laterally, and so up between the skin and the
alimentary system ; in doing so, it would naturally run in the furrows which still marked off the
diverticula. This new direction of the blood-stream was not conducive to respiration, for instead of
flowing up the inter-diverticuLir passage alongside the tracheal (? branched) invaginations which
projected into this passage, it was now driven past the invagination at right angles to it. This defect
■was rectified by the invagination developing flat leaf-like outgrowths arranged horizontally, between
■which the blood, flowing out laterally, could pass. These lung-books are therefore secondary speciali-
zations of the more simple tracheie which once projected into the inter-diverticular spaces. In some
Spiders, the specialization has taken place only in one (viz., the anterior) pair, while the posterior pair
have persisted more nearly in their original form. The disappearance of the original inter-diverticular
space, except in the 2nd segment, and the development of a crowd of branching digesting tubules have,
in the Dipneumones, caused the simple tracheal tubes in the 3rd segment to develop as tufts of
tubules t-
The diff"erent forms of tracheae have thus been closely dependent upon the variations in the alimentary
and circulatory systems.
Where the alimentary diverticula simply closed up against one another, gradually shutting off the
channel up to the heart along the dorso-ventral muscles, the diverticula, however, still remaining fairly
distinct, the blood flowed from the ventral sinus outward laterally, and lung-books were developed, while
veno-pericardial muscles mark the remains of the old inter-diverticular passages, and are still so far
functional as to keep the passages open through which the blood flows out laterally through the lung-
books.
When, again, the regular alimentary diverticula gave place to a confused mass of tubules without any
segmental arrangement, the original regular blood-stream was dispersed irregularly among the tubules,
and the tracheae grew out in all directions to follow it [Galeodes).
In the Pseudoscorpions, on the other hand, we have quite a diff'erent arrangement ; on the squcezing-up
of the inter-diverticular blood-passages the respiratory tubules of the first pair grew forward in a dense
tuft into the cephalothorax, and thus met the ventral blood-stream flowing back through the body, while
those from the posterior pair grew backward and followed the stream (lo).
I would thus deduce all the forms of trachea; from some simple form of chitinous invagination
occurring on each limb. It is obvious that the different existing forms cannot be deduced one from
another ; lung-books cannot develop tufts or the Galeodes system of lai-ge tubes, nor can either of these
produce lung-books. And yet there can be no doubt that the respiratory organs are all homologous
structures. The stigmata of Galeodes are obviously homologous with those of Thelyphonus and Scorpio,
inasmuch as their respective series overlap, and they occur in the same relation to limbs and in the
same relative positions on the limbs. We are compelled thus to assume some common structure from
* On the supposed origin of these from invagiuated gill-plates see p. 398.
t It is interesting to record th:it this method of esplaining the development of lung-books, arrived at by
-comparative morphology, has recently been confirmed by embryology. Jaworowski (35) has discovered that the
tracheal invaginations of Spiders first form branched tracheal tubes, and that the lung-books are a secondary
specialization.
37G ME. H. M. BERNAED OX THE
which both could be deduced. Do the Arachnids throw any light upon the original nature of this
structure ?
In the diagrammatic restoration of the abdominal limbs of Ga/eodes (PI. XXIX. fig. 11) I have
marked a row of structures which, from their positions with reference to the limbs, appear to form
a homologous series : —
On the 3rd segment are the apertures of the coxal glands. Although these open in Galeodes on the
soft membrane, in the Pseudoscorpions they open (on the 5th segment) on the hard posterior faces of the
coxae. These may perhaps not really belong to the series*. On the next segment there is a pair of
stigmatic openings into tracheae. On the next two segments, judging from the circulatory system, we
are justified in assuming that there were once stigmata opening into tracheae. On the genital segment
the limbs have been folded together to guard the median genital aperture, but opening on the inner
faces of the limbs, in a position exactly corresponding with the tracheae, are a pair of glands [gg) which
appear to yield a secretion playing some part in the reproductive process ; they perhaps yield a sticky
substance to glue the eggs together. In Phrynus and Thelyphomis a pair of glutinous glands, capable
in the former of yielding irregular threads, is found in what appears to be the same spot (PI. XXIX.
fig. 13). Following these glands, there ai'c, on the three segments, tracheae, or their remains, opening
in positions exactly corresponding with the apertures of these glands. Lastly, in the Spiders, on the
same (4th) segment in which the aborted tracheal invagination occurs in Galeodes, and nearly on the
same spot, the 1st pair of median spiuuing-glands is found.
If, then, these form a true series — and, with some qualifications to be mentioned later, I think they
do — we have some additional evidence as to the homology between tracheae and spinning-glands,
i. e. I believe with setiparous glands from which spinning-glands can best be deduced (see further,
pp. 323 and 383).
The development of tracheal invaginations on the legs of Phalangids (Hansen), which may, however,
only mean the finding of new apertures on the part of long existing tubes, is certainly not opposed to
this theory. No known " dermal" glands occur in such positions on the legs of Arachnids, but spines
and setae with large setal pores are very common, and each one would form a place where the tracheal
tubes could without difficulty " rise to the surface.'" An examination of the way the seta is suspended
in the setal pore by a thin flexible fold of chitiu shows that this is the probable solution of the
occurrence of these leg-stigmata (see the figures of hairs on PI. XXX.).
I shall have to return to the subject of the origin of trachea; in the next section.
Histological (PI. XXX. figs. 17 ((, 17 h). — The large tracheal tubes of Galeodes show,
in section, the structure of their walls. We have the glassy layer of the cuticle lining
tlie whole tube. This is found in distended specimens forced up to form great blisters
projecting iuto the lumen of the tracheae. These blisters are full of coagulum. It is
hardly possible that this can be a normal adaptation in cases of extreme distension. It
is more probable that, in the death-agony, muscular contraction forces the blood through
the walls of the trachese so as to blister up the innermost hard layer. Following this
layer is the chitinogenous staining layer. This forms the thick hooj)s much in the
same way as it forms the lens (PI. XXXI. fig. 7). The lamina3 seem to swell and thus
to form ridges over which the hard layer passes. In the two figures given, both drawn
from sections under the microscope, the ridges are not at equal distances, and some
difference seems to exist between the thicknesses of the chitinogenous layer between
the ridges. Outside this latter layer comes the plate-like epithelium with the nuclei.
These are clear disc-like vesicles, often with only one very minute staining-point ; they
are thus not easy to demonstrate.
* Oil this see note, p. 380.
COMPAHATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 377
XI. Excretory Organs.
The Galeodidge have two highly -developed organs of excretion — (1) the coxal glands,
and (2) the Malpighian. vessels.
The Coxal Glands. — These have been often described under various names : " glandes
saMvaires," Dufoiu- (31); " glandes stomachales," Blauchard (24) ; their true nature being-
recognized by Macleod (53) and Stui-any (70). No full account of them, however,
has ever been given.
Trom the apertui-e, which is found in the folds of the skin between the coxa; of the
3rd and 4ith segments, the duct runs backward. After making many coils behind the
central nerve-mass, it bends forward again almost as far as to its aperture, appearing,
m Bhax, to end at the chitinous plate above described (PL XXVIII. fig. 16,^, eg).
Laurie has found the coxal gland of Thelyphonus, and I have found that of Phrynus also, opening behind
the 3rd limb. According to Sturany, the coxal glaud of the Dipneumones opens in the same place.
These, then, form a group distinct from the Scorpions, Tetrapueumoues, Phalangids, and Pseudoscorpious,
in which the coxal glands open behind the 5th limb, although the two groups are connected by cases in
which traces of coxal glands are found on both the 3rd and 5th limbs (19, 70). The complete absence
of all traces of coxal glands on the -ith limb could, if these glands are homologous with tracheaj, be
explained by assuming that the original specialization of the invagination on this limb was for respiration,
an arrangement which has persisted in Galeodes.
In all the Galeodes examined, the duct of the gland, on reaching the chitinous plate,
develops a great mass of tubules which fill up the spaces between the other tissues.
The masses of tubules of the two ducts fuse to form a barrier right across the cephalo-
thorax ; through this the blood must filter on its way back through the body towards
the abdomen.
A simjjler condition was, as above described, found in a hungering Rhax. Whether
the more complicated condition found in the genus Galeodes is a periodical or a
permanent variation, I have been unable to ascertain. It was noticed by Dufour.
i'he main duct is, as a rule, comparatively free from connective tissue. Where, however,
it is thrown into coils, the connective tissue is more pronounced in order to regulate
the How of blood between them ; these blood-passages are richly supplied with tracheae
(PI. XXXIV. fig. lUj. The cells which comj)ose the waU of the main duct are long ovals,
as shown in the same figure. They appear to rest upon a hyaline membrane which dips
down between the rounded outer ends of the cells. In this romided outer end the staining
strands within the protoplasm are arranged in a characteristic manner. Within the body
of the cell they stream inwards like a tangle of hair, showing no regular striation.
This streaming ceases after running through about | or | of the length of the cell, and the
rest is clear, with, however, a granular wall facing the lumen of the tube. The nucleus lies
in this clear space, and is sometimes deeply stained and small (2-3 ^), sometimes large
(6 i/j) and vesicular, with deeply-staining granules.
This description of the main duct agrees fairly well with that of Chernes, although in the latter case
certain details were not visible, and the lumen of the tube was relatively much smaller. On the other
hand, the long oval cells differ greatly from those composing the main duct in the coxal glands of Scorpio,.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 50
378 . ME. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
Phrynus, and Myyale (Lankcster), which are large flat cells, each presenting a considerable area on the
external surface of the duct. This difference, however, may be simply a matter of support. In Galeodes
the duct is not bound together by connective tissue ; hence the compacter arrangement of the cells
composing the wall. The nature of the striation found in the coxal glands — viz., that it is due to the
arrangement of the protoplasm in the oiiter layers of the cells themselves — is also seen in the long cells
of Galeodes, but is not so clear in the case of Scorpio.
A close examination of these cells, and of the contents of the Inmen of the duct,
confirms a previoiis ohservation (12) that the nuclei absorb the excretory matter, swell
up, and are finally discharged as large clear vesicles.
I thought at first that the clear matter in the inner ends of the cells might be
discharged or perhaps even the distal ends of the cells themselves mignt break off.
The latter hypothesis would accormt better than the former for the finely granular and
often vesicular appearance of the discharge. But the variations in the size and character
of the nuclei, the fact that groups of small deeply-staining nuclei are found in the act
of dividing (PI. XXXIV. fig. 11 a), and further that the discharge can be found at times to
consist of vesicles closely agreeing in size with the large vesicular nuclei, suggest that it
is the nu.clei which absorb the excretion and are then discharged. If this is the case, there
shoxxld be a small resting nucleus in each cell ; I have only rarely succeeded in finding-
one. Fig. 11 shows a cell with two nuclei, one of which, the larger vesicular nucleus,
seems to be on the point of escaping. The measurements given in the figures refer to
Galeodes ; in my sections of Rhax, I found the small staining nuclei averaging 3 /t, while
the large vesicular nuclei were 6/«, and the discharged vesicles Q^ and larger. The
different sizes of nuclei appear in patches ; where only small staining nuclei are found, the
inner ends of the cells do not contain so much clear matter.
I have already described a similar phenomenon in Scorpio, where the discharge of the nuclei seemed quite
as apparent. I have since reinvestigated the subject with other specimens, and have only been confirmed
in my opinion. The point is, however, one of such importance that I hesitate to make any dogmatic
assertions ; there are, perhaps, other ways of interpreting the phenomena. The whole subject requires
investigation with material specially preserved.
Eor a long time I thought that the duct in Galeodes was actually in communication
with the hollow sponge-work of the chitinous plate (PI. XXVIIl. fig. 16,^), as the
tubules of the terminal j)ortion appear to be developing out of it (the plate). But I have
now convinced myself that this is not the case. The chitinous plate merely forms a
suj)port for this and other tissues.
Histologically, the end tubules forming the great sj)ongy mass in Galeodes (PL XXXI.
fig. 5) differ considerably from the main duct. They are bound together liy connective
tissue which contains a tangled mass of blood-lacunre and tracheae. The blood seems to
run largely in folds of the limiting membrane (PL XXXIV. figs. 13, 14). The tracheae
often appear to have thick protoplasmic walls ; at times it seems as if four or five tracheae
of various sizes ran through the same protoplasmic mass. There is no striation of the
protoplasm of the epithelial cells, which are hyaline, Avith large, deeply staining nuclei,
and crowded together. The nuclei here also seem to be fragmenting in groups, and
COMPAEATIYE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID^. STO"
then measure 3x2/u. At their largest they are ahout 3^X3 a*, and the chromatin
is then more granular. They appear never to hecome swollen and clear like the large
nuclei of the main duct.
These end-tubules are perhaps the homologue of the branching tubes from the proximal end of the
coxal gland of Scorpio. In both cases they are supplied with blood by a special arrangement of the
parts. It is not easy to ascertain their morphological significance. Are they simply secondary
developments of the proximal end of the main duct, or are they primitive coelomic structures comparable
•with the end-saccules of the anteunal and shell glands of the Crustacea? These are questions which
cannot be answered without further investigation. I am myself disposed to regard them as
secondary developments of the proximal ends of the ducts. In each case the epithelium in a way
repeats the character of that of the main duct. In Scorpio the cells forming the main duct are large
and flat, in Galeodes they are thin and cylindrical. Similarly, in the end-tubules of Scorpio the cells
are squamous, with protuberances containing the nuclei ; in Galeodes the cells of the end-tubules are
crowded and more or less cylindrical. In Scorpio, further, the epithelium cau be seen gradually passing
from the striated form of the main duct into the non-striated form of the end-tubules. Further, the
duct of the coxal glands in Obisium appears to me to end blindly and to have no terminal differentiated
portion. Sturany found no internal opening in that of a very young Tarantula, and Lomau (50) did
not succeed in demonstrating an internal aperture to the gland in the Phalangids.
On the other hand, Laurie claims to have found the gland opening into the ccelom iu a Scorpion
embryo. Until this is confirmed, however, the bulk of e\'idence seems to point to the coxal gland as a
blindly-ending tube, with, in certain cases, a branched differentiated portion, which somewhat resembles
the end-saccules of certain Crustacean glands.
»*
The external aperture of the coxal gland is not easy to find, heing obscvired by the
folds of the soft skin behind the first pair of legs. On an excised piece of skin, however,
the aperture can be seen as a round hole with thickened edges. In such a preparation
from a Galeodes, a curious knob-like structm-e developed from the wall of the duct
protrudes through the aperture.
Uomology of the Coxal Glands. — What is the homology of these coxal glands which
occur in nearly all the Arachnids on either the 3rd or the 5th segment of the cephalo-
thorax, but never on the ith segment or in the abdomen ? Many investigators, relying
chiefly upon embryological evidence, claim them as true nephridia, inherited from the
Annelidan ancestors of the Ai-achnida.
For my own part, I believe that the Arachnids are to be derived directly from Annelids,
i. e. without the intervention of any specialized intermediate form. If so, where are
the primitive nephridia ? It is no doul)t possible that the coxal glands in the cephalo-
thorax are persistent nephridia, and very probable the ducts of the genital glands in the
abdomen are adapted nephridial ducts. On the other hand, iu the Annelida, the
nephridia tend to disappear from the anterior segments of the body as the posterior
segments develop, especially when the anterior region shows great structural modification.
We should therefore hardly expect nephridia to persist in the cephalot borax of the
Arachnids. My own suggestion that these coxal glands might be developments of the
setiparous sacs and therefore homologous with the tracheae on the other segments, wliich
would explain (1) their appearing in Line with the tracheae and spinning-glands, (2) their
50*
380 ME. H. M. BEBNAED ON THE
occurrence in the cephalotlioi'ax, and (3) their absence from the 4th segment and from
the abdomen, has hitherto met with no favour. The general opinion, which I am still
unable to share, seems to be that they must be regarded as true nephridia *.
The Malpighian Tubules. — These are well developed in the Galeodidse. They open
into the mid-gut in the region of the 4th abdominal segment, one on each side. The
apertures are large, as indeed are the main ducts of the glands, and, near the entrance, the
epithelium lining them closely resembles that of the mid-gut. It is instructive to note that
the entrance is at the point where the fsecal masses commence to form. (PI. XXXIII.
fig. 1.)
The main ducts run forward and backward on each side of the central canal of the
mid-gut, somewhat ventrally, to near the diaphragm anteriorly and the stercoral pocket
posteriorly. They give off a thick felt of fine tubules which encircles the posterior part
of the mid-gut, just before its junction witli the hind-gut, while larger and more important
branches ramify among the digestive tubules. The finer branches are less than 10 ^ in
* I have been severely blamed (Kingsley 36, Laurie 47) for persisting in suggesting that coxal glands may be
•derivatives of setiparous glands. I take this opportunity of explaining why I do so in spite of the array of well-
known authorities who, on embryological grounds, claim them to be true nephridia. It is quite possible that they
are, but I do not think the evidence is sufficient on cither side to admit of dogmatic assertion. They are said to be
mesodermal in origin, but the endosternite and the stercoral pocket have also been claimed as derivatives of the
mesoderm. These latter appear to me as very good illustrations of the great difficulties which lie in the path of the
embryologist. The study of Galeodes shows beyond doubt that the endosternite is an infolding of the cuticle, and
the stercoral pocket is an outgrowth of the chitin-lined hind-gut. In the same way, the difficulties in investigating
the developing coxal glands are very great. In the adult animal the aperture of the gland is by no means easy to
find. It was long thought that there was no aperture in the adult Scorpion, and I have only found the aperture in
Galeodes in two specimens. The investigation cannot, therefore, be an easy one.
On the other hand, I do not think that my suggestion involves any great morphological heresy, but, on the
contrary, it is, under the circumstances, a very natural one. It arose out of my endeavour to show in detail how
Apvs could be deduced from a chietopod Annelid (4, see also " Systematic Position of the Trilobites," Quart. .Tourn.
Geol. Soc. vols. 1., li.). The primitive Crustacea should therefore have originally possessed tufts of setae on both
the dorsal and ventral branches of the limbs. On the ventral branch such tufts may perhaps be found in the
tooth-like bristles of the guathobases ; but on the dorsal they are now scattered, or vanished. This assumption has
recently been amply justified. In the Trilobite Triarihnis Beclcii, tufts of setae have been found on the dorsal
branches of head-limbs answering well to those which I postulated for the immediate ancestors of Apus. These
tufts have vanished from the vestigial dorsal branches of the head-limbs of A2ms, but we find instead glands, in all
three pairs, which seem to me more likely to be derivatives of setiparous glands than of nephridia. There is some
reason, indeed, for believing that it is especially when parapodial appendages degenerate (see pp. 403-404) that the
glands of their supporting acicula become modified for other uses.
The 1st gland belongs to the 1st segment, and in its structure is very like a setiparous sac, still attached by
muscles to the body-wall. It opens on each side into the mouth-aperture (4). This I would attribute to an acicular
gland of a vanished parapodium of the 1st segment.
The 2nd gland opens on the base of the 2nd antenna ; it is only developed as a gland in the young Ajnis (Glaus),
but degenerates in the adult. In the higher Crustacea it persists as the antennal gland. Its position is not clear,
because the morphology of the limb is not yet understood. The basal swelling on which its aperture persists in
Apux is difficult to homologize with any part of a typical parapodium.
The 3rd gland opens upon the vestigial remains of the dorsal branch of the parapodium of the 5th segment,
where we now know from TriartJiriis that a tuft of setaj once existed. It develops into the shell-gland.
These three glands appear to form a series, of which the 1st, by its structure, suggests a modified setiparous gland,
and the last by ts position on the dorsal branch of a limb where we know that a tuft of setiB once existed.
COMPARATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODIDJi:. 381
diameter. Whether the ramifications anastomose I liave not been able to discover.
The tubules themselves are very irregular, the terminal portions swelling into irregular-
shaped knobs or vesicles.
It is important to note that these ramifying excretory tubes are confined to the
digestive mass ; at least, I can find no trace of them projecting beyond, /. e. into the
blood-spaces under the skin. The peristaltic action of the muscular tunic of the
alimentary canal and diverticula Avould produce a certain waste which would have to be
removed.
The Malpighian tubules are formed of a very low, finely ciliated epithelium (except
near their apertures, where they continue the character of the mid-gut epithelium), with
large round or oval nuclei, 2-3 /i in diameter. The epithelium rests on a granular
membrane, which appears to blister off from the epithelium so as to form small lacunse
between it and the cells. This seems not to be the case everywhere, but where it occurs
gives the impression of being a normal and not a pathological or post-mortem phenomenon,
as the cells do not break away from the membrane altogether, but remain attached,
I only observed this on portions of the tubes dissected out and examined in tofo. As
in the coxal gland, the contents of the interior appear as masses of clear round or oval
vesicles with slightly granular envelopes. These excreted vesicles do not show the same
close resemblance to the nuclei of the lining cells as do the vesicles in the lumen of the
coxal glands, although appearances in favour of a similar origin were not altogether
A\anting. This whole subject requires new and extended investigation on better
preserved material, and conducted solely with the one object of discovering whether the
discharge of nuclei in excretory processes is the true explanation of the phenomena.
In Scorpio, the Malpighian vessels arise at the boundary between the mid- and hind-gnts, where the
faecal masses appear to form (in the 7th abdominal segment), and no doubt, as in Galeodes, belong to
the mid-gut. They arise close to each other on the dorsal wall, and run straight forward on the dorso-
Further, (1) the well-known progressive backward degeneration of the anterior nephridia in Annelids, and (2) the
«laim that the chitinogenous cells utilize excretory matters in the formation of the cuticle, are additional arguments
in favour of the deduction of the antennal and shell glands of the Crustacea from setiparous glands. The secondary
opening of ectodermal invaginations into internal spaces is so common an occurrence that it presents no serious
difficulty.
On turning to the Arachnids, the general resemblance between the coxal glands and the antennal and shell glands
of the Crustacea is sufficiently striking. Might thej- not also be setiparous in origin? They appear to belong
to the same series as the traeheae and spinning-glands, and are always associated mth limbs. This hypothesis,
further, best explains their singularl}- limited distribution.
I freely admit that these arguments would have but Httlo weight as against direct embryological evidence, if
that evidence were reaUy satisfactory. But, apart from the difficulties of observation above noted, the evidence from
embryology does not appear to me to he conclusive. For instance, if setiparous sacs could become specialized for
excretory purposes into complicated organs no longer purely ectodermal, there is no way of knowing whether the
course of the development of such organs repeats its ph3logenetic history or whether the definitive form is not at onee
laid down. In the Arachnids, which have no larval stages, each appearing with its definite characteristics even
in the egg, it seems to me highly probable that all the more important organs are laid down in their definite
form at their first appearance, and that their ontogeny teaches us but httle of their phylogenetic history. For this
reason I cannot follow Kingsley in being satisfied with the embryological evidence. I believe that the ultimate
decision rests with comparative anatomy.
382 MK. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
lateral wall of the gut to near tlie diaphragm. They give off numerous branches which ramify among
the " peritoneal " cells (" fat body ") . This fact seems to connect them very closely with the digestive
functions. At the same time, it must not be forgotten that the mid-gut and the digestive tubules are all
provided with muscles, the waste of which would have to be got rid of. The tubules are lined with a
ciliated epithelium closely resembling that of the same tubes in Galeodes.
In Thelyphonus, the tubes enter tlie mid-gut just posterior to the constriction in the 6tli segment, in
the region of the 7th segment, near the commencement of the enlargement of the gut which functions
as stercoral pocket, and which I believe to be the true hind-gut (PI. XXXIV. fig. 2). Arising at the
sides of the gut, they at first run backward, and twist about ventrally and laterally, closely applied ta
the wall of the gut. They then run sti'aight forward, and give oft' branches among the digestive tubules.
In Phrijnus, the true chitin-lined hind-gut commences in the region of the 7th segment. I
have, however, been unable to ascertain the exact points of entrance of the Malpighian vesicles. They
can be seen twisting about the canal, as in Thdyjjhonus , close to the gut, and probably open in the
7th segment.
The Malpighian vessels in the Spiders are well developed and ramify freely among the digestive
tubules within the "fat body," i. e. among the "peritoneal" cells. I have not myself been able to
ascertain their exact points of entrance. As in Galeodes, the tips of the tubules are often swollen
(Wasmann, Plateau, Schimkevitch). The tubules appear to be ciliated as in Galeodes, although it
is extremely difiicult to see the cilia. But the central core of faecal matter with which they are filled is
never in actual contact with the deeply-staining epithelial cells ; a clear sjjace, which, under high powers,,
looks like a band of cilia, separates the two. It is difiicult to see how the faecal bodies would find their
way along the tube, excepting by means of ciliary propulsion. Whether the tubes in the Spiders
have retained their original excretory function or not is difiicult to say ; they appear to have
undertaken another function — viz., that of assisting to remove the fsecal masses from the blind tips
of the alimentary diverticula (ii).
The loss of Malpighian vessels as excretory organs in the abdomen may perhaps be correlated with
the absence of the coxal glands in the thorax in the majority of Spidei's. Compensation for the loss of
these two principal excretory organs has probably to be sought in the highly developed poison- and
spinning-glands, and perhaps in the fact that, in the Spiders apparently alone among Arachnids,
the skin of the abdomen is traversed by countless pores opening to the exterior. Excretory matter
might perhaps be discharged through these pores by the action of the hypodermal cells.
The Pseudoscorpions (which have both spinuing-glands and cement-glands) appear to have no
Malpighian tubules. The part functioning as hind-gut commences in about the 2nd-;3rd abdominal
segment, and is coiled in the median plane (PI. XXXIV. fig. 3).
The Phalangidse also appear to have no Malpighian vessels ; the hind-gut is large and lills up a great
part of the abdomen. In both these forms the digestive system shows no very complicated branchings,
and excretory matter might easily be removed by the blood circulating freely among it.
In the Acari, the Malpighian vessels appear to be present in some forms and absent in others.
Michael found no traces of them in the Oribatidse, while Winkler has found them in the Gamasidae.
Wagner has found them in Ixodes, developed from the endoderm.
There can be little doubt that the [Malpighian vessels are homologous structures throughout the
Arachnida. In Scorpio, Thelyphonus, and Phrynus, as we have seen, they open in the region of the
7th abdominal segment. The vexed question as to whether they belong to the mesenteron or proctodaeum
is finally decided by Galeodes, in which they obviously belong to the former. They are thus not
homologous with the Maljjighiau tubules of the Hexapoda. It is possible that they may be speciahzed
diverticula, homologous with those which anteriorly subserve digestion. In Scorpio they appear to
enter the gut dorso-laterally, as do the digestive diverticula.
COMPARATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 383
Revietv of the Ghtnds in the Arachnids. — The Galeodidse appear to differ from all other large Arachnids
in possessing no other couspicuous glands, such as poison- or spinning-glands, although the former were
at one time claimed for Galeodes. Their well-developed coxal and INIalpighian glands appear to suffice
to remove waste products. In addition to these must be added the glands which open within the
genital aperture and which may secrete some glutinous substance (PI. XXXIII. fig. \,gg).
In Phrijmis there are well-developed coxal glands and ]\Ialpighian tubules. To these, however, must
be added spinning-glands, which appear to correspond with the glands opening within the genital
aperture in Galeudvs. They belong to the limbs forming the genital operculum, and yield the coarse
silk on the egg-cocoon (PI. XXIX. figs. 11, 13,ff(j).
The Pseudoscorpions have coxal glands, but no Malpighian vessels. On the other hand, they have
enormous spinning-glands, opening at the tips of the movable digits of the chelicerie, as discovered by
Croneberg, and cement-glands opening behind the genital aperture. These glands appear to develop
periodically and probably not concurrently, and it may be safely assumed tliat they utilize a large
proportion of the waste jjroducts.
The silk-spinning powers thus feebly developed in Phrynus, and more strongly in the Pseudoscorpions,
Iiave reached their most marvellous development in the Spiders, where, in many cases, a perpetual
flow of silk seems to suffice to utilize all the waste products, so that the coxal glands can degenerate,
and the Malpighian vessels change their functions. From this point of view, the web-spinning of the
Spiders for the netting of prey is but a development of the cocoon-spinning of the Pseudoscorpions.
In addition to the spinning-glands, the Spiders have well-developed ])oison-glands.
In Scorjno, in addition to the coxal glands and IMalpighian vessels, there is a pair of large poison-
glands in the 'sting' on the anal segment. And in Thelyphunus also, in addition to the well-develoi^ed
coxal glands and Malpighian vessels, there is a large pair of glands (stink-glands) which open on the
soft membrane round the anus, on each side of and slightly above the anal aperture. It is highly
probable that these poison- and stink-glands, like the spinning-glands, utilize waste products. The
stink-gland of Thehjphonus is probably homologous with the poison-gland of Scorpio. That these three
glands, poison-, spinning-, and stink-glands, are the common derivatives of the setiparous glands is, if
not universally, at least widely accepted.
One of the more striking instances of tufts of hair in one Arachnid occupying the exact position of
spinning- and poison-glands in others is to be seen in the hairs on the dorsal surface of the tip of the
movable digit in the chelicerie of Phrynus (PI. XXIX. fig. 2, set) . These stout hairs seem deeply set in
pits. In the Pseudoscorpions, at exactly the same sjiot, are a group of minute apertures for spinning-
glands, and in the Spiders there is the aperture of the poison-gland. Lastly, in Galeodes these setje
have vanished, while the setal pores appear to remain open, showing no specialization into glands of any
kind, but, as I have suggested, possibly exuding matter which is highly poisonous.
If the tracliete are added to the spinning-, cement-, and poison-glands as homologous structures, we find
that there must have been two series on each side. In the Pseudoscorpions, for instance, we have median
cement-glands [cf. the stigmatic combs of Galeodes) with lateral stigmata in the 2nd-3rd abdominal
segments, and in the Spidery we have median and lateral spinning-mamillse. In all, we can comit
five consecutive segments of the abdomen with spinning- or cement-glands near the median line (i. e.
if the spinning-glands of Phrynus are median and do not belong to the distal ends of the limbs), with
lateral stigmata and spinning-glands occurring at the same time and on the same segments.
These four series, two on each side, can, it seems to me, only be deduced in different ways from the
setiparous areas on the parapodia of the original Annelidan ancestor, as shown in fig. 18 B (PI. XXXIV.).
This will explain the present variations of positions and the serial arrangement of the glands in Arachnids
in a very simple manner.
To this point I shall return in the section on the Phylogeny of the Araehnida.
384i MK. II. M. BEENAKD ON THE
XII. Reproductive Organs.
TJw Female Oi-gans. — The female reproductive organs do not depart from the well-
known Arachnidan type. Two spacious ovaries run along each side of the abdomen.
Posteriorly they end blindly in tbe 6th or 7th segment, or, curling, they end blindly
somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd (PI. XXX. fig. 11, i. e. if this figure is not that of a male,
see below). Anteriorly, they narrow to form the much-folded chitin-lined oviducts, which
enter a common atrium, also chitin-lined.
This atrium, the walls of which are much folded, aj)pears to be attached anteriorly by
muscles to the diaphragm, and is rather spacious posteriorly. In one of my series of
sections [Rhax nigrocincta) it is distended with blood-plasma (?). In this same specimen
the oviducts run along the lateral wall of this atrium and open into its posterior
portion. TJie external genital apertui'e, on the other hand, is at its anterior end.
This aj)erture is a longitudinal slit between the genital opercula. The thin cviticle of
the inner edges of the opercular folds is often jwotruded to form a pair of lips (PI. XXIX,
tigs. 7, 8, 9, 10).
I have not satisfied myself as to the exact position of the aperture *. There seems to be
considerable variation. I found several of the specimens in the British Museum with a
sHt-like aperture anteriorly betAveen the genital opercula (PI, XXXIV. fig. 15, g'). If
this anterior opening is the genital apertui-e, then the posterior {g") may be the openings
of the glands marked gg, PI. XXIX. fig. 11, and PI. XXXIII fig. 4. In other cases
there can be no doubt that the genital aperture is between the posterior lip-folds, and
that the glands open within it and on each side of it (23). Bii-ula makes no mention
of any more anterior opening.
The only trace of accessory glands which I have discovered is the pair of glands above
mentioned, just within the genital apertiu-e (PI. XXXIII. fig. 4<,gg). They lie within the
cavities of the opercula themselves. Birula suggests that these may be receptacula
seminis, but this I doubt. The semen is contained in spermatophoral envelopes which
find theu" way in enormous numbers into the oviducts themselves. These pockets Avould
not hold more than one or two at the most. Prom the position of these glands, I am
myself disposed to consider them as liomologous structures with the cement- and spinning-
glands of the Pedipalpi {cf. gg, PI. XXIX. figs. 11, 13). Bu-ula describes other glands f.
The ovaries are covered by unstriped muscle-fibres, which in Galeodes ater (Bir.) and
Ai^meiodes (Pall.) consist, according to Birula, of a layer of circular and a layer of longi-
tudinal fibres. In my own specimen, tliis appears to be rather an irregular felt. The
epithelium is short and columnar, with large oval nuclei (PL XXXIV. fig. 16). The
oviducts and the atrium are covered with a very thick layer (felt) of muscle-fibres, which,
in some cases at least, are clearly transversely striated.
The eggs are found developing as buds on the outer wall of each ovary, i. e. not on the
side turned towards the longitudinal axis of the body. My material is not well enough
* la the sijecimen of Ehax nigrocincta above mentioned, by a curious abnormality, the genital aperture occurred
asymmetrically at the aide of the body, along the dorso-lateral edge of the right genital operculum.
t The recent paper by Birula has thrown welcome light on many points connected with this subject. His
connected account makes the fragmentary character of my own contribution less a matter of regret than it
would otherwise have been.
COMPARATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 385
preserved for tvustworthy observations on the egg and yolk formation. With regard to
the latter, I have seen most of tlie interesting phenomena described by Birula. In
addition to the follicular membrane surrounding the eggs, the latter develop tough,
membranes of their own with a definite structure {cf. PI. XXXIV. fig. 16, em), the
outermost j^ortion being finely laminate, the innermost radially striated as if liighly
jjorous.
I have found no ripe eggs within the ovary. On the other hand, the " ovaries " are
often found distended with the large oval glittering spermatophorcs which, when first
seen, I took to be eggs. Birula seems to be the only writer who recognized them to be
spermatophorcs ; both Dufour and Kittary describe them as eggs. Such an error is
well calculated to throw our knowledge of this svibject into confusion. Indeed,
we are still not clear on many points. Ai-e the animals with their glands distended
with spermatophorcs {cf. PI. XXX. fig. 11) males or females ? Mr. Pocock has shown
me several whicli, from other characters, he thought were males, with their glands
similarly distended from end to end -with spermatophorcs. So far as our knowledge
goes, the males have no such capacious sacs, although they may be specially developed
at the breeding-season. All that we can really say is that certain specimens are found
with glands distended with spermatophorcs. As far as I can gather from Birula's
account, such specimens might be either males or females, since the glands in both
may be so distended. The question of sex seems to depend entirely upon our finding eggs
in process of development, or testes. The specimens having the spermatophores,
according to my experience, had no eggs ; but, on the other hand, the only specimen
showing testes had no such large receptacles to be distended in the manner described
(PI. XXX. fig. 11), although, as above stated, such sacs may perhaps develop as soon as
needed. To judge from Birula's description of the genital glands in the male of G. ater,
my figure, which represents a specimen of G. arahs, would be that of a male. The curious
posterior distension of the poi-tion where the gland curves round to run forward may be
secondary, and due to the enormous quantity of spermatophores produced.
An undoubted ovary, with developing, eggs, I found filled from end to end wdth small
cells ; even the atrium was similarly crowded. These, according to Birula, are amoeboid
and devour the spermatophoral envelopes, the superfluous sperm-cells and unfertilized ova.
Considering that one spermatophorc apparently contains enough sperm to fertilize all the
po-o-s which could bud on the limited surface of the ovary, the waste must be enormous
when the latter is distended with sj)ermatophores, which seems sometimes to be the case.
The eo'gs are said to develop into embryos within the ovary, and the embryos are said to
be deposited, apparently in a very immatui-e condition, in holes in the ground.
Male Organs. — I have been still less fortunate in making out the male organs, and,
further, what 1 have seen does not appear to agree with Birula's description. Perhaps
the difi'erences are specific. Dufour found two types of male glands. T have suc-
ceeded in finding the filiform testes twisting about among the alimentary diverticula
in only one specimen {G. arahs). The tubes Avere surrounded by a membrane hooped with
fibres, as are the alimentary diverticula. These fibres are probably muscular.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 51
•386 ME. H. M. BEENARD ON THE
The lumen of tliese membranous tubes is completely filled with i-ound cells arranged
in groups *, each group being, perhaps, the product of a sperm mother-cell. I have not
seen the transformation of these into the filiform condition, nor the formation of the
spermatophoral envelopes. Kittary, in describing vv-hat I take to be these tubes, thought
them to be full of future eggs, and he described the spermatophore as a ripe egg. Dufour
figures two types of male organs, but does not seem to have seen any spermatophores ;
when he found them in the ovaries he described them as eggs, and was even unconsciously
misled into drawing eggs, budding from the wall of the ovary, oval like the sjierma-
tophores. Birula, has, however, as above stated, discovered the true relations.
The sperm is arranged in a number of distinct longitudinal bu.ndles within the sperma-
tophores, each bundle showdng a fine longitudinal striation, due to its composition out of
filamentous sperm-cells which are arranged longitudinally. The silky look of the sperma-
tophoral envelope is due to the fact that it is so thin and delicate that it fits closely to
the contained sperm and takes a slight impi-int of the fine striation due to the ultimate
sperm-cells.
Copulatory organs are altogether wanting. Birula states that in G. ater and G. ara-
noides the genital apertures of male and female were alike.
The genital glands of Galeodes do not therefore differ greatly from those of other Arachnids,
Whether the paired ovaries meet and fuse, or the testicular tubules anastomose or not, is a point of
mo morphological significance. Their different developments in this respect seem to depend largely on
the development of the alimentary diverticula. In Galeodes the alimentary system keeps the genital
glands apart ; in the Pseudoscorpions they can easily fuse in the space left in the middle line beneath the
hind-gut. In Scorpio the alimentary diverticula are arranged in definite segmental masses, between
■which the genital glands can spread, and thus may join across the middle line. In the Spiders the
ovaries seem to fuse posteriorly in some cases and not in others. In Phrynus, according to Blanchard,
the ovaries do not fuse; in Thelyphonus, according to Tarnani, they also do not normally fuse,
although this author describes in a note a singular case of transverse anastomosing between them. In
the Phalangids and the Acari the genital glands appear generally, if not always, to fuse posteriorly.
There can, then, I think, be little doubt that the anastomosing of these glands in the Arachnids is a
secondary development, and that the primitive condition is that in which the glands are paired tubes
"without any transverse fusion.
Copulatory organs are also generally absent in the Arachnids, excepting in the highly-specialized
Phalangids. The so-called penis of Phrynus appears to be formed of the remains of a pair of jointed
limbs of the genital segment. They may have sexual functions in addition to the two ascertained
functions, (1) to hold fast the cocoon, and (2) to spin the threads which strengthen the cocoon.
Spinning-glands open near their tips (77). This 'penis' can hardly be an intromittent organ. The
remarkable ram's-horn organs of the Pseudoscorpions have been thought to function as penes, but I
believe them to be a primitive form of trachea (10).
In the Pseudoscorpions the cement-glands belonging to the 2nd and 3rd abdominal segments serve
somewhat the same purpose as the spinning-glands of Phrynus ; they are said to stick the eggs on to
the abdomen. From this primitive habit the cocoon of Phrynus may have developed.
In the Spiders, glands still more posteriorly placed, and opening on the spinning-mamillse, prepare
* These cells appear very like the homologous bodies in the testes of Scor^no, and also not unlike the bodies
figured by Tarnani (71) as occurring in tubules in the abdomen of Thelyphonus ( J ), which he describes as " glands "
opening into an unpaired reservoir in connection with the genital apparatus. Are these not the sperm-cells?
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID^. 38T
the cocoon. It has been suggested to me by my friend Mr. Pocock tliat tliis was the primitive
function of the spinning-mamillie, and that from it all the web-spinning of the Spiders has been
secondarily developed.
XIII. Summary : an Aitempt to Elucidate the Phylogeny of the Arachnida.
In a comparative study like the foregoing, it has been imjjossible to avoid drawing
conclusions as to the relative order in time of the appeai'ance of the different specializa-
tions. Some must obviously have preceded others and led up to them. Hence, at the
close, we find it possible to arrive at some conclusion as to the primitive ancestral form,
and we are in a position to construct a hypothetical form which possesses (1) only those
specializations which ai-e common to all the members of the class, (2) these same
specializations only in that stage of development which comparison leads us to believe to
have been the most primitive. The different specializations of the ancestral form must
all be at stages from which the more complicated specializations of the different members
of the group can be deduced.
It is obvious that we can have no clear view of the position of the Arachnida among the
Arthropoda until we have arrived at some fairly accurate conclusion as to the common
ancestor of the former. It remains to be seen whether the type we can reconstruct on
the lines just laid down has any points of affinity with any existing specialized type of
Arthropod, or whether we have to seek its nearest relatives in the common ancestors
of all the Arthropods, the segmented Chsetopod Annelids.
The way for such speculations is, however, not altogether clear, inasmuch as a vigorous
and long-sustained attempt has been made to demonstrate a relationshij) between the
Arachnids and the Merostomata. For clearness of argument I propose therefore, in the
following hypothetical reconstruction of the ancestral form, after each section, to show
how it bears for or against such relationship.
Figures 14! (PI. XXIX.) and 12 (Pi. XXXIII.) show the most important characters,
external and internal, of our reconstructed ancestral form. This appears to possess most
of the specializations common to the group in their least specialized condition.
1. Number of Segments. — We may faiiiy assume that the common ancestor possessed
18 segments {Scorj^io, Thelyphonus), the greater number of segments being evidently the
least specialized number. In the majority of the Arachnids, this number is, as a rule,
more or less reduced in adaptation to certain specializations which will be mentioned
presently ; the full number is only retained where the terminal segments have been
secondarily developed into a kind of tail.
This number agrees with that of the segments of the Eurypterids, from which it is thought Scorpio
might be descended.
2. Fusion of the Segments. — A comparison of the different Arachnids shows that the
first fusion embraced the three anterior segments. These were bound togetlier by the
distortion of the first segment, which, by the formation of the cephalic lobes, was tilted
upward and backward so as to cover the 2ud segment and part of the 3rd (PI. XXVII.
fio-. 8). Gideodes and (?) Schizonotus are the only known Arachnids which have remained
51*
388 ME. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
at this stage. In other Araclmicls, the 4th, 5th, and 6th segments have been secondarily
fused in various degrees of compactness. (In the Pseudoscorpions, I do not think it
quite certain that the 6th segment is fused ; see (oite, p. 313.) In the Spiders, the
fusion is remarkable in being fairly even, but the lines of constriction still appear
dorsally radiating from a centre. The compactness of the fusion has reached its
extreme in Scorpio and Phalangimn.
In this gradual incorporation of body-segments in the area of primitive fusion, the
Arachnids resemble other Arthropods, but they stand quite alone in the method of the
initial fusion. In no other Arthropod did the fusion commence by the distortion and
backward dorsal prolongation of the 1st segment, for the purpose of developing the 1st
pair of appendages as powerful prehensile organs. In this the Arachnids are separated
fundamentally from all other Arthropods.
Had this essential feature in Arachnidan morphology, revealed by the study of the Galeodidse, been
earlier recognized, the possibility of a close relationsliip between the Arachnids and the Merostomata
would not have occurred to any one. They are, in this all-important matter — viz., the primitive
specialization of the undifferentiated segmentation of their common Annelid ancestor — poles asunder
{cf. PI. XXXIV. figs. 17 A, B). Whereas the Merostomata were primitively differentiated by a back-
ward ventral distortion and bending of the first segment, leading to subsequent fusions of following
segments, the Arachnids, as we have seen, were specialized by the backward dorsal distortion and dis-
placement of the same segment. We fortunately have nearly all the stages of the former process pre-
served to us in the remains of early Trilobites and of their larvae. It reaches its extreme in Limulus
and the Gigantostraca, in which the ventral displacement of the mouth and distortion of the first segment
beyond all recognition have gone furthest. Similarly, in the Arachnids, Galeodes enables us to trace
the stages in the process of the specialization of the anterior segments, which reaches its extreme in
Scorpio and Phalancjium. Thus not only do the Arachnids and the Merostomata stand poles asunder
in the principle of the cai-liest specialization, but Limulus and Scorpio are in this respect extreme
forms, and thus still wider apart.
A question, however, ai-ises as to whether it would be possible for an animal specialized to the one
extreme, say to that oi Limulus, gradually to become modified by the forward movement of the mouth
till it resembled the other extreme. I think it is safe to assert that this is impossible, because, in both
the extreme cases, the primitive segmentation is no longer traceable, and any subsequent adaptation
would not revive the early and vanished segmentation, but would merely change its existing specialized
shape. For instance, many Crustacea have secondarily re-acquired a mouth pointing anteriorly. This
has not taken place by any reappearance and re-tilting of primitive segments : they were lost as such
beyond recovery. The mouth has regained its anterior position by the modification of existing parts,
thereby still further enveloping the primitive segmentation in mystery. It is doubtful whether, but
for the Trilobites and the Phyllopods, the early method of specialization of the segments forming the
Crustacean head would ever have been discovei'ed. Hence, while it may not be impossible for the mouth
of a Limulus to return once more from its extreme posterior to the anterior position, in doing so it could
not once moi-e undo all the specialization of its segmentation. For in order to develop into a Galeodes,
which is in this respect the most primitive Arachnid, it would have to recover its long-lost Annelidan
segments almost in tlicir primitive condition, and then, after tilting the 1st back on to the dorsal surface,
further develop this primitive Arachnidan specialization till it reached the Scorpion stage. So that an
animal having carried one specialization to an extreme would have to undo it all, in order to try a
specialization the exact opposite of its own. I think it fairly safe to say that this is impossible.
3. Terga. — The primitive form possessed a well-marked terguua on each segment,
COMPAEATIYE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E, 389
beginning from the 3rd, and stretching back the whole length of the body. This
condition is still traceable in Galeodes, but in the gre^xt majority of Arachnids it is
obliterated by fusion, the terga in front of the Avaist fusing to form a shield. The
diflerent forms of the shield, furtlier, require us to assume that it arose in the different
families from different arrangements and fusings of the primitive free terga.
This is incompatible with the large cephalic shield of a Limulus [or the smaller but not less compact
shield of the Euryptcrids], which is far too specialized a structure to have given rise to the free terga of
Galeodes, or the many different arrangements of fused terga which now form the various cephalic shields
of Arachnids.
Further, the cephalic shield of Limulus and the Euryptcrids, so far as the evidence from Apus and the
Trilobites goes, did not arise from fused terga, i. e. if we use the term "tergum" to signify a definite
plate-like thickening of the dorsal surface of a segment connected with the terga of the neighbouring
segments, and with the " sterna," by means of flexible membranes.
4. Stei'iia. — There can be little doubt that the ancestral form possessed segmental
sternal plates all along the ventral surface, which have been variously modified and
obliterated in the different Arachnids (PI. XXIX. fig. li). The first obliteration was
doubtless due to the distortion of the 1st segment, whereby the first sternite became the
rod-like support of the labium {\). 315), and the 2nd was more or less crushed between
the coxEB of the pedipalps. The 3rd either persists but slightly altered (Spiders), or has
been variously modified and ol)literated, in Thclyphomis by transverse infoldings, in
Scorpio by lateral compression from the coxa? of the legs. The sternite of the genital
segment was also, no doubt, early ol)literated, perhaps partly owing to the folding back
of the limbs of that segment over the genital aperture and partly to the formation of a
waist.
From these two points of initial obliteration of sternites we have almost all stages of
further obliteration, culminating in the Galeodidoe.
It is quite impossible to deduce a racial form with a regular seines of segmental sterna from an animal
like Limulus or Eurypterus, in which the original sternites of the first six segments have been so
completely obliterated. In order to develop into a typical Arachnid, Limulus would have again to undo
its specialization and once more develop its lost sternites, lost on the ce])halothorax by the extreme back-
ward prolongation of the mouth, and, having recovered them, specialize them along the lines followed by the
different Arachnids. This, I think, is next to impossible. If the mouth of a Limuloid did travel once
more to an anterior position, deep traces (scars, as it were) of its former Limuloid specialization would
persist ; it could not return so exactly backward along the path of its development, and once more recover
its segmental sternites in their original position, order, and undifferentiated condition as would
be necessary for it to develop into an Arachnid. The subsequent modifications of a Limulus or of a
Eurvpterid would be the modifications of a Limulus or Euri/pterus, and not of a form showing primitive
undifierentiated segments, from which alone, I believe, the Arachnids can be deduced.
5. Intersegmental MemJjranes. — The presence of terga and sterna implies also the
presence of flexible intersegmental membranes. These still persist in various degrees in
the Arachnids, although in the anterior region they have been to a great extent folded in,
owing to the muscular compression of the cephalothoracic segments. In Galeodes ^exQ-eal
such membranes persist between the terga of the cephalothorax. In Scorpio and Chernes
the terga have fused to form a cephalic shield, but tlie lateral membranes persist. The
390 ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
disappearance of the intersegmental membranes in the cephalotliorax of Arachnids is to
be correlated with the formation of the endoskeleton. In the Spiders they have almost
completely gone ; we accordingly find in this group the most complicated endoskeleton.
Between the 6th and 7th segments the intersegmental membrane typically forms the
waist or diaphragm.
In the abdominal region these membranes persist and lend the segments the great
distensibility which is required by the specialization of this part of the body into a-
vegetative sac.
These intersegmental membranes, required for the primitive Arachnid, are not easily obtainable from'
a Limuloid or Eurypteroid ancestor with its hard, well-jointed, and highly specialized exoskeleton and
rigid head-shield.
6. The Endosfernite. — The translocation of tlie first two pairs of limbs to positions
above and at the sides of the beak, and, generally, tbe great muscular development of the
first six segments, have led to deep infoldings of the intersegmental membranes to form
different kinds of endoskeletal structures, according to the different specializations and
degrees of compression of these segments. We have the endosternite and the Avaist or
diaphragm.
The nearest equivalents in other Arthropods to these endoskeletal structures are the
infoldings separating the bead and thorax, and the thorax and abdomen, of the Hexapoda,^
and the endopbragmal system of Astacus and its nearest relatives. These are all
structures formed in the same method — viz., by the longitudinal compression of segments
leading to an infolding of intersegmental membranes, in each case in response to some
special method and area of compression.
The endoskeleton of Limulus, which has been compared with that of the Arachnids, has had an
entirely different origin, and is therefore not an homologous structure. It receives its full elucidation in
A2)us as the fusion of the intersegmental tendinous tracts of the ventral longitudinal muscles from which
the contractile tissue has atropliied. This origin is in as perfect harmony with the specialization of
the primitive segmentation of the Merostomata as is the rise of the Arachnidau endoskeleton with the
specialization of the Arachnida.
7. The Waist or Diaph'cujm. — The two chief regions of the body are separated by a
waist or diaphragm, the origin of which can perhaps be traced primarily to the folding
together of the appendages of the 7tb segment towards the median line over the genital
aperture to function in various ways as sexual organs. It is not improbable that the
slight constriction caused by this arrangement was taken advantage of to cut off the
hinder region as a vegetative sac, with a narrow neck into which the fluid food could be
pumped in great qiiantities without fear of interfering, by undue distension of the
alimentary canal, with the mechanism of locomotion and prehension of the anterior (6)
seo-ments. From this j)oint of view, it is probable that the diaphragm, which is most
perfect io Scorpio, implies the former presence of a waist. The primitive waist, how-
ever, need not have been so pronounced as that of the Spiders and Pedipali^i, which is
almost certainly a specialization of this arrangement. The Galeodidie seem to combine
the two, forming both a slight waist and a fairly complete diaphragm. On the one
side, then, we have the constriction completed to form a true waist ; on the other, the
I
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 391
constriction obliterated, and a diaphragm stretching all across the body. In this respect
Galeodes stands, perhaps, nearest the racial form. Where there is no waist or constriction,
it must he considered to have been secondarily obliterated.
A structure showing such variations can, it seems to me, be deduced only by the infolding of the
membrane between two primitive undiflerentiated segments. It must date back to a time when the 6th
and 7th segments were joined by an undifferentiated intersegmental membrane capable of being drawn
in at any point or at all points. Evidence of this may be fonnd in the very simple character of the
intersegmental membranes between the segments of Scorpio or Galeodes immediately posterior to the
waist. This primitive condition, which was necessary to the foimation of a waist, is not supplied by
Limulus, in which the posterior region hinges in a rigid and highly specialized manner on the anterior,
■or by the Eurypterids, where the segments of the tail-region almost certainly articulated with each
other, and with the head-region, for specialized motion in the sagittal plane for swimming.
8. The Division of the Body into Eegions.— One of the earliest .specializations of the
primitive Arachnid was its division into two regions. The anterior, consisting of six
segments, was specialized for locomotion and prehension, and consequently sensation.
The posterior region, composed of tlie remaining segments, became a vegetative sac,
capable of great distension for the reception of large quantities of the liquid food sucked
in and of the genital products. The simjile imdifferentiated character of the abdominal
segments, and their different specializations of a varying munber of terminal segments
into tails, show that when the sac was first formed the segmentation was of the simplest
kind (PL XXIX. fig. 14).
In this division into regions, the Arachnids resemble Limulus and the Eurypterids. In each case the
anterior region is locomotory and prehensile, and consists of six segments, while the posterior region
contains the remaining segments. Is this interesting agreement, however, any sign of close genetic
relationship ? Can the two regions in Limulus be the origin of the two regions in the Arachnids ? The
two regions in Limulus are clearly very pronounced specializations for certain purposes, but those
purposes are not the same as those which gave rise to the two regions in Arachnids, and this fact
is fatal to any close relationship between the two. The head-region in Limuhts is not only for locomo-
tion and prehension, hut it is also developed into a remarkable shield-like expansion not only for
protection but also for the reception of the digestive glands and of the genital products, which
thus crowd forward right to the anterior end of the body. The posterior region in Limulus consists
of the fused remains of a number of free flexible segments, once, no doubt, of great loocmotory
significance in swimming. In Limulus they persist now chiefly as carriers of gills, and in the
Eurypterids they served apparently as an organ of propulsion through the water.
Admitting in theory that specializations fundamentally affecting the whole morphology of an animal
group may, after reaching an extreme, become very greatly modified towards an earlier and simpler
condition, I hold it to be impossible that any such specialization should be completely undone in order
to allow the animal to run its course a second time along a different line of specialization. And yet this
is what is implied if the specialized abdominal regions of Limulus or Euryplerus are to become the
abdominal regions of the Arachnids : they must have reverted to their primitive undifferentiated meta-
merism, for it is only from such undifferentiated segmentation that the abdominal regions of the different
Arachnids can be deduced. The full force of this argument will be further seen when (1) the limbs
and (2) the internal abdominal organs are appealed to.
9. The Beak. — The possession of this organ in such diverse Arachnids as Galeodes,
Chernes, and Thelyphonns, and the easy deduction of the mouth-parts of Spiders,
392 MR. H. M. BERXAED OX THE
Scorpio and Phrynns, from such an organ, render it almost certain that a beak was
present in the original Arachnid. The construction of the heak out of a lahrum or
prostomium in its original anterior position, and of a labium formed l)y the protrusion of
the ventral surface of the 1st segment, seem necessarily to imply an undifferentiated
condition of tbe anterior segmentation in the immediate ancestors of the primitive
Arachnid. The beak points back to a simple Annelidan condition of the segmentation
(PI. XXXIV. fig. 17 A).
This, to my mind, renders the derivation of the Arachnids from Limulus or Euryjitertts, with their
extremely specialized anterior segmentation, well-nigh impossible. It seems to me hardly possible that
any Limulus-Wke animal with the ventral position of the prostomium (PI. XXXIV. fig. 17 B) and the
obliteration of the steruites {cf. supra) could ever again recover the anterior position of labrumand labium
with so little sign of previous modification. What direct evidence we have as to the recovery of an
anterior position of the mouth from the ventral position of Apiis and Limulus shows that this is attained
by the rudimeutation of the prostomium or labrum. We have in Limulus a slight tendency to move
forward from the position of the labrum in the Trilobites, owing to the crowding round the mouth of
so many jaws, the consequence being that, as compared with the labrum of the Trilobites, it is a very
rudimentary organ. And further, in Eurypterids it appears completely to have vanished, or at least is not
discoverable. After having once taken up the ventral backward position, it could not so completely undo
that specialization as to tilt forward so as to point anteriorly as it is found to do in the Arachnids, leaving
no traces whatever of its former structure and position. The labrum of the Arachnids occupies very
nearly the same position it originally held in the Annelidan ancestor, and there is no sign that it has ever
occupied any other.
10. The Ocular Tubercle. — An ocular tubercle, ^. e. an island of the original dorsal
surface left between the cephalic lol:)es as they approached and fused in the middle line,
must have been present in the primitive form. It is now very largely obliterated, but
persists in Galeodes and the Aviculariidoe and in some Scorpions, in which latter its
origin is most clearly shown. It is quite peculiar to the Arachnids as a class.
This ocular tubercle is unknown in any other Arthropods, as, indeed, we might expect, since no other
Arthropod luiderwent the same peculiar distortion of the primitive segments. Limulus and the
Eurvpterids naturally show no traces of such a structure, whereas were they primitive Arachnids we
should expect to find it in its least difl'erentiated condition, somewhat as we find it in the Silurian
Scorpion Palmophonus [cf. text & PI. XXVII. fig. 10, ds).
These several points so far disciissed deal entirely with the external specialization of
the primitive segments. They sejoarate the Arachnids comj)letely from all otlier Arthro-
pods, and furthest of all from Limulus, whose essential morphology, or, in other words,
whose early differentiation of the primitive ancestral metamerism, was the very reverse of
that of the Arachnids. As Arthropods, no relation whatever exists between them; as
segmented animals, however, they are both derivatives from the Chaetopod Annelids, but
along diflferent and opposite lines of sjiecialization.
11. The First Appendage. — The chelicerse of the Arachnids can be most easily deduced
from a claw-like limb of three joints, from which both the existing forms of the
appendage can be deduced.
It is not easy to deduce the primitive claw-form of the limb from an ancestor already equipped with
specialized pincers, such as those of Limulus.
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID^. 393
12. The Second Api^endaye. — There can be little doubt that the original form and
position of this was leg-like, and that the chelate form was secondarily acquired.
This has little direct bearing ou the question of the relationship of the Arachnids to Limulus, but it is
so far of importance, inasmuch as it is an item in the mass of evidence to show that Scorpio is not
a primitive form, so that the detailed comparison between Limulus or Eurypterus and Scorpio, which is
one of the foundation-stones in the argument for their close relationship, is of little or no value.
18. The position and character of these two limbs, together with the consequent
specialization of the segments to which they belong, form the most essential feature in
Arachnidan morphology. We have in this arrangement a clear adaptation to a special
and peculiar method of feeding. The acquisition of a new and successful method of
feeding, i. e. of acquiring the materials for growth and reproduction, seems to me the
most important of all adaptations for new points of departure in animal morphology.
I have already adduced evidence to show that the class Crustacea can be deduced from
segmented chaetopod ancestors, which bent their hrst segments ventrally to push the food
on which they browsed into their mouths by means of their j)arapodia. From what we have
seen in the foregoing, tlie class Arachnida may be deduced from a segmented Annelidan
ancestor in which the first two pairs of limbs were shifted forward and grouped round
an anterior mouth, which mouth, as a consequence of this very shifting of the limbs,,
came to be situated at the end of a beak. The method of feeding which this arrangement
implies, that of seizing and wounding prey and sucking their juices from the wound,
is common, with slight variations to all the Arachnida.
That this was the primitive arrangement is certain from the fact that it is not only
found in all Ai-achnids, but is accompanied by many different specializations for preventing
the escape of the juices, and others agaia for straining them. Further, the different
forms of the beak, with the differences in the position of the sucking- ajjparatus, also
show that this plan of feeding was the one first adopted by the ancestral form. In
this respect the hypothetical ancestor differed from all the other classes of the Arthro-
poda. Almost all other Arthropods have chewing-jaws projecting more or less into the
oral apertiu'C. It is true that some of these secondarily adopt a method of feeding by
sucking, but the adaptation starts from the persistent jaws, which become transformed
into lancets, &c., for the purpose.
Of all Arthropods thus feeding by chewing-jaws, Limulus has reached the extreme, with five pairs
of biting-jaws arranged around an oral aperture. The Eurypterids are, if anything, still more highly
specialized, inasmuch as the last pair of the Limulus jaws have developed more or less at the expense of
those in front of them. The question arises, could Limulus change its method of feeding from biting
into sucking juices? It is perhaps possible; but if it did, these jaws woidd persist in some form or
other as component parts of the piercing and sucking apparatus, in order to maintain the necessary
continuity in feeding. Is it, however, at all likely that the distal eud.s of two pairs of limbs brought
prey to a mouth so armed, and crushed it there for the mouth to suck, while the powerful and highly
specialized jaws remained useless, and thus atrophied ? This is so improbable that the idea may be
dismissed.
It is true that in Scorpio it is claimed that traces of two pairs of jaws are still to be seen. They form
the spoon-like arrangement under the mouth, which prevents the escape of juices. But a comparison
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI, 52
394 MR. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
with other Arachnids sliows that these processes on the coxae, and even the position of the coxas themselves^
are secondary specializations {cf. e.g. Thehjphonus). Further, these coxae were never jaws, inasmuch as
they do not work in the mouth, but behind it and below it ; the small pointed labium is quite a distinct
structure anterior to these so-called jaws. If the small labium could be found below them or wedged in
between them, so that they formed any part of the real boundary of the oral aperture, they might
perhaps claim to have once been jaws. But, in all Arachnids, the oral aperture is distinct and without
jaws. The nearest approach to anything like a pair of jaws working at the sides of the mouth is found
in the Spiders, where the coxse of the pedipalps form a hairy barrier on each side of the oral slit to
prevent the escape of juices, functioning in this respect like the coxa; of the pedipalps iu Thtlyphonus and
Phry-ims.
If Limulus or Eurypterus was anything like the ancestral form of the Arachnids, how is it that all
traces of such specialized jaws as they possessed should have disappcai'ed ? In some important Arachnid
familv traces of true jaws would certainly have been found, had they ever existed in the ancestral
form. Instead of which we find a regular series of coxae showing a variety of specializations, which
only admits of being deduced from a series of uniform unspecialized coxal joints, certainly not from a
series of specialized jaws,
14. The Coxal Joints. — The primitive form possessed a series of vxniformly developed
coxal joints, which vi^ere originally no doubt movable. The Spiders and Phrytms have
alone retained this condition. In all other Arachnids we find fixation of some or all
of the coxse, and great variations in their sizes and in their approximation towards the
middle line [cf. above paragraph on the sternites and PL XXVII. figs. 15-18,
PI. XXVIII. figs. 1-2).
As stated in the last paragraph, I hold it impossible that all these varied developments of coxse could
be derived from a series of closely-compressed lamellate jaws working round a ventral mouth. If such
jaws could open wide enough to become useless in feeding, and thus to atrophy, allowing the mouth to
travel forward between them for an entirely different method of feeding (the sternites reappearing in
its wake!), we should expect to find, in some Arachnid or other, traces of the former biting-ridges or
teeth along the coxae ; we should hardly expect to find the large, round, smooth coxae looking so exactly
like the derivatives of a primitive undiflercntiated series. We should hardly expect either that these
gaping and atrophying jaws, which would become rigid during this useless time, would once more
become movable, once more approach the middle line, obliterating the sternites a second time, and then
again become fixed. And yet this must have happened if Limulus is to be genetically related with
Galeodes or Thelyphomts as a more primitive form. I repeat that I do not believe it possible for
specialized forms, in becoming adapted to a new manner of life, completely to lose all traces of their
former specialization.
15. Vestigial Abdominal Limbs. — The primitive form, specialized, as Ave have seen,
into an anterior locomotory region and a posterior vegetative sac, retained for a longer
or shorter time the remains of the limbs on the latter region, which, owing to its
specialization, had become useless for locomotory purposes. Every segment had its
vestic:ial ambulatory limbs, which have now almost completely vanished, except when
retained for other functions. We have limbs modified into sexual organs, into sensory
feelers (pectines), into spinning-mamillae, and into genital or stigmatic opercula. Where
they have vanished as projecting limbs, they have simply flattened down, leaving in
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. 395
some cases an area more or less marked to indicate their former presence. From the
character of the limljs which persist as such, we learn that they did not differ from those
of the cephalothorax, but were filamentous jointed appendaii:es like the walking-legs.
It is practically impossible to obtain these conditions from Lhnulus or the Eurypterids, whose
abdominal limbs were too highly specialized ever to give rise to a series of filamentous rudiments such
as are found in the Arachuida, and found, moreover, specialized in such various ways and for such
diflerent functions that we are obliged to assume that they are all developments of some simple
undifferentiated form of limb. It has further to be remarked that the recent demonstration of the
existence of Phyllopodan limbs in the rudimentary segments of the Trilobites explains the lamellate
character of the abdominal limbs of Limulus. We have, then, to ascribe very different origins to the
abdominal limbs in Limuius and in the Arachnids; in the one they are primitive Phyllopodan limbs,
persisting in the interests of respiration, while in the Arachnids they are the remains of a series of
filamentous locomotory appendages.
Until quite recent times, again, the rudiments of abdominal limbs in the Arachnida were thought to
be confined to the first six abdominal segments, that being the number and arrangement of abdominal
appendages in Limulus. But the traces of abdominal limbs in the Arachnida are not confined to these
six segments, for they occur in all the segments.
IG. The Muscular Si/stem. — The primitive Arachnid possessed a typical Annelidan
musculature, specialized (1) for the movement of locomotory and seizing appendages ;
(2) anteriorly, in adaptation to the new positions of the anterior ap^^endages, thereby
leading to the formation of the cephalic lobes ; (3) posteriorly, in adaptation to the
differentiation of some or aU of the abdominal segments into a distensible sac ; and (4),
in those cases in \\ hich the terminal segments were sj^ecialized into a ' taU,' for the move-
ments of that appendage. In addition to these, we have the primitive oesophageal
muscles developed into the powerful expanders and contractors of the jiumjoing-apparatus.
A well-developed series of dorso-ventral muscles extended certainly as far back as to the 8th
abdominal segment {Theli/2}fionus},]yrohab\j still further. Besides, a study of the various
existing arrangements of this musculature in the Arachnids leads to the conclusion
that they can only be deduced from an original Annelidan condition, each along its
own lines.
Inasmuch as the musculature of Limulus is also a sijecializatiou of a typical Annelidan musculature,
it is possible to homologize all those muscles which can be certainly shown to be derivatives of the
same Annelidan muscles. The original argument which Prof. Laukester based upon the muscular
system breaks down in so far as he confined himself to one Arachnid, Scorpio, which is not
primitive in the matter of its segmentation. We may add, further, that the muscular system of the
Arachnida could never have passed through anything like the extraordinary specialization of the
Limulus musculature, once again to revert to its primitive condition, to be again specialized into the
Arachnidan type.
Further, as a great part of the ai-gument in favour of the relationship between Limulus and
Scurpio is based upon the great external resemblance between the two, when we consider how intimately
associated the muscular and skeletal systems are, we are unable to understand the divergence of their
muscular systems [cf. Beck and Benham). Lastly, while the musculature of Limulus can be shown to
be a further development of the simple musculature of Apus, which is itself a specialization of the
52*
396 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
ADnclidan type of muscles, that of the Arachnids is a specialization of the muscles of primitive
undifferentiated segments, starting fi'om a time when the intersegmental membranes were not drawn in
to form an endoskeletal system.
17. The Central Nervous System. — The original form possessed a central nervous
system somewhat less specialized than that of the Spiders. The concentration of
locomotion at the anterior end of the body, and its liigh development, taken in connection
with the degeneration of the posterior region into a vegetative sac, would lead to a
crowding together of the ganglia of the locomotory segments along the floor of the
cephalothorax, while those of the abdomen degenerated, except where retained for
special functions (ef. the formation of tails, &c.). The translocation of the first pair of
appendages would easily lead to the wandering of their ganglia up the ocsojihageal
commissures until they assumed a supra-oesophageal position. From this primitive
difi'erentiation we can deduce all the central nervous systems of the Arachnida ; the
variations they present being always in harmony with the different degrees of longitu-
dinal compression of their cephalothoracic segments.
No two central nervous systems could well be more unlike than those of Limulus and Scorpio. They
are extremes of opposite specializations. The brain has in Limulus retained the ventral position due to
the bending round ventrally of the prostomium, while in the Arachnids it has retained the primitive
dorsal position, and in Scorpio has been forced further backward dorsally than in any other Arachnid,
Ijy the crowding forward and upward of the ganglia of the first two pairs of appendages. Limulus
and Scorpio are thus wider apart in this respect than any other two Arthropods, each representing an
extreme position of the brain proper. I use the word " brain " to indicate those ganglia which, in a typical
Annelid, are supra-oesophageal, the optic and prostomial (and ? certain ganglia innervating the mid-gut) .
18. The Eyes. — These, grouped originally on an ocular tubercle {cf. p. 392), perhaps
consisted of two large median and a certain number of accessory eyes, which latter have
very generally (except in the Aviculariidae) wandered away laterally on to the cephalic
lobes.
The histological character of the primitive eyes is probably no longer ascertainable. From this point
of view, no value whatever can be placed upon a comparison of the eyes of Scorpio and those of Limulus.
We do not know whether the median eyes really correspond in the two, nor whether, in view of the
great differences which prevail among the eyes of Arachnids, those of Scorpio are primitive. Further,
any resemblance between the eyes would not necessarily mean any relationship between Limulus and
the Arachnids as Arthropods, since the primitive Annelidan ancestor possessed eyes, and some common
form of eye might have been transmitted to the two groups of descendants, the Arachnida and the
Palseostraca.
19. The Oesophagus and the Sucking- Apparatus. — The position of the sucking-stomach
in the primitive form was in front of the nerve-mass (Galeodes, Scorpio, Thelyphonus,
Chernetids). This is in keeping with our description of the original distortion of the
anterior segments. The backward dorsal distortion of the 1st segment, while its sternal
surface was protruded to form the labium of the beak, naturally drew the oesophagus
COMPARATIVE MOEPHOLOGT OF THE GALEODID.E. 397
forward, the brain being forced backward. In the Spiders, in which the svxeking-
stomach is behind the nerve-mass, we still have traces of its former position, in the
persistence of a few expanding- muscle-fibres (PI. XXVIII. fig. 8).
In Limvlus we have the arrangement which the distortion of the segments would naturally bring about ;
the brain lies close to the ventrally-arranged prostoraium, and the greater part of the oesophagus, specialized
into a kind of masticatory stomach (proventriculus), is thus morphologically behind it, actually above
and in front of it. The arrangement is thus the exact opposite of what we find in the primitive Arachnids.
If Limnlus is related as a primitive form to the Arachnids, then the position of the sucking-stomach
in the Spiders would have to be considered as original, and that of the other Arachnids as secondary ;
but, as already shown, the existing mouth-parts of Arachnids are best explained on the assumption
of a primitive beak, in which case the condition found in the Spiders is not primary but secondary.
As already stated, the straining apparatus in the Arachnids is so varied that the sucking of living
juices must have been the primitive method of feeding. The proventriculus of Limv/us, on the
other band, is specialized for the trituration of solid food. Both of these appear to be independent
developments of some simpler Annelidan oesophagus with its expanding and contracting muscles.
20. The Mid-gut. — The mid-gut in the primitive form stretched from the 3rd segment
through eleven (or tAvelve) body-segments, and was provided with at least nine pairs of
segmental diverticula, four in the cephalothorax, and five in the abdomen (Sco7yio). Of
these diverticula, those in the cephalothoracic region, i. e. in front of the waist, began to
degenerate as the body divided into two regions, the anterior for locomotion, the posterior
for digestion and reproduction.
The mid-gut of Lhnvlus perhaps begins, as in the Arachnids, in the 3rd segment, but it is more
specialized. There appear to be only two diverticula which are glandular and not digestive. These two
probably correspond with the first two in Arachnids, i. e. if the oesophagus of Linmlus corresponds in
length with that of the Arachnids. If Linmlus is a primitive Arachnid, it has lost seven pairs of
diverticula, and those which persist are specialized into glands. It seems to me far easier to believe
that the specializations of Linmlus and of the Arachnids are entirely distinct modifications of some
undifferentiated Annelidan type than to endeavour to connect the two as nearly related. The
specialization of the mid-gut in Limiihis is strikingly different from that of the Arachnids. One of the
essential features of the Arachnidan morphology is the distensible abdomen, while the head-region is
specialized for locomotion and sensation. In Limulus the mid-gut and its diverticula are chiefly
specialized in the head-region, having lost all traces of diverticula in the abdominal region. The
specializations in both cases are extreme, and I repeat again that it is not likely that any extreme
specialization should ever swing right back to the opposite extreme, as must have been the case if the
Arachnids as a group are deducible from a Limulus-MVe ancestor.
21. Heart and Circulation. — In the original form, the contractile heart ran through
at least ten segments (ith to 13th inclusive), being continued both anteriorly and pos-
teriorly by non-coutractile vessels. There were at least ten pairs of ostia drawing blood
from ten pairs of inter-diverticular blood-passages. As the cephalothorax became more
specialized, the three pairs in front of the diaphragm degenerated, except in Tkelj/phonus
and Galeodes. In the abdomen also the great specialization of the diverticula of the
mid-gut leads to variations in the number of ostia and to the general closing of the
398 MR. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
inter-divei'ticular blood-passages, traces of which, however, persist in the veno-pericardial
strands.
The heart of Limulus is not unlike that of the primitive Arachnid. It appears, however, to have
commenced in the 3rd segment, and to have extended hack to the 10th (incl.). The veno-pericardial
connections perhaps arose in the same way as in the Arachnids, and would therefore indicate the former
presence of more alimentary diverticula, which have since degenerated. These resemblances between the
two animals are perfectly explicable as their common inheritance from their Annelidan ancestors. It is
obvious that the hearts are not strictly homologous, inasmuch as that of the primitive Arachnid
extended through more segments than does that in Limulus.
22. Besjiiration. — The primitive form had respiratory invaginations commencing in
the 4th segment of the cephalothorax, and extending at least as far back as to the 8th
segment of the abdomen. The series was clearly in close physiological connection with
the ostia of the heart and the inter-diverticular blood-passages {cf. PI. XXXIII. fig. 12),
A respiratory invagination projected into each of the last-named. A primitive arrange-
ment like this will explain all the present arrangements found in modern Arachnids,
both alimentary, circulatory, and respiratory. The form of the respiratory invagination
was probably some sunple (or j)erhaps slightly branched) chitin-lined tube from which,
in the manner described above, either lung-books, tuft-trachese, or branching tracliese
could be deduced in adaptation to the subsequent specialization of the alimentary or
circulatory systems.
One of the main arguments for attempting to connect Limulus with the Arachnids is the apparent
possibility of deducing the luug-books from the gills of Limulus. But the backing-up of hypothesis by
hypothesis can only give the appearance of strength. The only attempt at evidence in favour of this
demonstration is that deduced from embryology, in which it is shown that the gills and the lung-books
make their first appearance exactly like one another. It is not easy to see what else could be expected.
Given the respiratory invagination opening on the posterior face of rudimentary limbs, a sagittal section
passing through such an invagination would naturally give the appearance of a limb with the lung-book
on its posterior face like the gills of Limulus. The embryological evidence decides nothing, and
the ultimate appeal has to be made to comparative anatomy.
The answer to be given, for instance, to the question " Were there ever flat lamellate limbs like those
of Limulus on the abdomen of the primitive Arachnid ? " goes far to settle this matter. AVhat actual
evidence we have as to the character of the abdominal limbs shows that they were filamentous jointed
appendages like those on the cephalothorax, but hardly so highly specialized. Indeed, neither in shape
nor in number do the remains of limbs in the Arachnids correspond with those oi Limulus.
Again, the sensory plates on the three joints of the pectines of Scorpio, which are supposed to be
persistent remains of the gills of a Limuloid ancestor, ai'e seen in sagittal sections to be on the ventral
face of the limb, and not on the posterior or upper face. They are closely parallelled by the racquets on
the same three joints on the last leg of Galeodes, which certainly could not have been dedviced from
branchial leaflets turned into sensory processes, if such a transformation is possible. The branchial
leaflets were not on the first three joints, but on a specialized area of the Limulus leg comparable with
the gill of Apus and the epipodite of the Crustacea.
Further, the invagination of four pairs of gills on segments iii.-vi. of the abdomen will not account for
the position of the tracheie in any other Arachnid except Scorpio. It will not account for the tracheje
in the cephalothorax in Galeodes, nor for the two kinds of tracheae, tuft and branched, in the abdomen.
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE OALEODID.E. 399
nor for the remains of stigmata found in the Pseudoscorpions and Thelyphonics on segments in the
abdomen posterior to the vith *.
On the other hand, the evidence adduced from the circulatory, respiratory, and alimentary systems
of Arachnids (which are in such intimate physiological connection) demands a series which Limulus
could not supply, even though the invagination hypothesis had much more to support it than it has.
23. The Coxal Glands and Maljnghian Vessels. — The primith-e form had excretory
glands opening behind the limbs on the 3rd and 5th segments. These may be persistent
Annelidan nephridia of these segments. The nephridia have otherwise vanished (? genital
dixcts). It is not easy to account for this disappearance of glands of such primary
importance to their Annelidan ancestor.
The single pair of Malpighian vessels openiug into the mid-gut of modern Arachnids
are not homologous with the proctodeal Malpighian vessels of the Hexapods, and may
perhaps be homologous with one of the numerous pairs of alimentary diverticula
of the Ancestral form which became useless for digestive purposes [of. p. 361). Whether
these vessels in the Arachnids are really serial with the digesting diverticula in the
more anterior segments I cannot say. That such diverticula may become glands is
well known, and why not also excretory glands ?
Excretory glands, assumed to be nephridia (see, however, footnote, p. 380), occur in the cephalothorax
in Limuhis, where, owing to the concentration of viscera in this part of the body, they are more
explicable than is their limitation to the cephalothorax in the Arachnids. They open on the 5th
segment (Tower, Zool. Anz. 1895, p. 471) and are apparently liomologous with the shell-gland oi Apus.
Proctodeal Malpighian tubules do not occur in Lhmilus ; in this respect both Limulus and the Arachnids
are distinct from the Hexapods.
24. Spinniiif/-, Stinging-, Cement-, and Stink-glands. — No other group of Arthroj)ods is
so abundantly and so variously supplied with such glands as are the Arachnids. As the
probable derivatives of setiparous glands of an Annelidan ancestor they suggest
that the primitive form was richly supplied with setae. This was indeed the case, as Ave
can gather from the great hairiness of the Galeodidse and the Aviculariidoe, and from the
immense number of large pores, closely resembling setal pores, through the integument
of Scorpio.
The Merostomata, as specialized for a free swimming life, had generally lost their primitive Annelidan
sette. It is very doubtful whether, if they became adapted to a land life, they would be able to
redevelop them. This is not all. They would have to be redeveloped in their eai'ly Annelidan form
when their secretory glands were still capable of modification into other kinds of glands. For it seems
to me that these glands in the Arachnida, occurring in such well-defined series, can only have been
derived very early from the series of setiparous areas which occur typically on the parapodia of Chaetopod
Annelids (see below, p. 404).
25. Reproduction. — There is, in the primitive form, a single pair of glands opening
together on the first abdominal segment, the limbs of Avhich closed together over the
aperture, either to form a sexual organ or a plate-like protection for the aperture. As
* Jaworowski (35) claims definitely, in his embryological researches, to have proved that the branched tratheiE
preceded lung-books, which are but a secondary specializatiou of the former. On the other hand, Wagner (73)
maintains that the primitive Arachnid had no tracheae in the cephalothorax ; Galeodes alone proves the contrary
inasmuch as its segmentation shows it to be, in this respect at least, a jirimitivc form ((/. also pp. :571-376).
400 MR. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
the alimentary diverticula became specialized, tlie glauds underwent variations, their
ends often meeting and fusing. The reticulate form found in Scorpio arises from a
series of such fusings between the alimentary diverticula ; it is certainly not primitive.
The reticulate form of the sexual gland iu Limulus is more highly speciaHzed thau was that of the
primitive Arachnid.
The ^Resemblance of Scorpio to the Eiirypterids, due to Convergence. — The foregoing
arguments show very conclusively that there can be no real relationship between the
Merostomata and the Arachnids. The great resemblance between the Eurypterids and
Scorpio must therefore be one of convergence. This is not difficult to demonstrate. In
the first place, it is obviously so if Scorpio is a specialized and not a primitive form, and
this we have abundantly shown. Indeed, the very point in which Scorpio most
resembles the Eurypterids — namely, the great compression of the anterior limb-bearing
end of the bod}' — hapj)ens to be its most marked, specialization, which has caused it to
depart furthest from the primitive condition witli free segments.
But the argument can be made very much stronger. It is obvious that if the resem-
blance between the Eitrypterids and Scorpio is not a case of convergence, then, as we
go back along the lines of their development, we should find this resemblance getting
more and more striking, until we reached their common ancestral form. In order thus
to trace the two back to their sources, the advocates of their relationship have made
a close study of their embryological development, and have very naturally discovered a
wonderful parallel. But embryology, in this case, teaches us nothing, because each form
is laid down from the first in its definitive shape, so that the likeness of the embryo is but
a repetition of the likeness of the adult. But where embryology fails us, comparative
anatomy comes to our aid ; its study will, I expect, be found to reveal the phylogenetic
history of animals and groups of animals with more precision than embryology
ever can. This is certainly so in the present case, in which embryology does not in
either case teach us anything clear as to what its less differentiated ancestors were like.
Thanks to comparative anatomy, we can reconstruct iu some important details the
ancestors of the Arachnids before the segmentation became too specialized ; we can
ascertain the leading specializations of that segmentation, marking off for all time the
Arachnid phylum from all other derivatives of the Chsetopod Annelids. Further,
Arachnids still persist in which only three segments are fused together, all the rest being
free. Turning now to the Merostomata, — do we know what their earlier, less differ-
entiated forms were like — those forms, for instance, in which only the three anterior head-
segments were fused together ? If so, does it resemble the Arachnid at that same stage
of segmental differentiation more closely than Slimonia resembles Scorpio ? No, the very
reverse is the case. We can deduce the Eurypterids with some precision from less
specialized, more richly segmented Trilobite-like forms with head-segments in all stages
of fusion — five being the usual number. But all resemblance to the Arachnids has gone,
whether to those which we claim to be specialized or to those which, having only three
segments fused anteriorly, we claim to be less specialized. We thus find that, as we trace
the two forms back to their less differentiated ancestors, all resemblance between them
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OV TILE GALEODID-E. 401
completely vanishes ; i. e., in other words, the resemblance between the specialized forms .
is purely convergent.
Relation of Modern Arachnids to the Hypothetical Ancestral Form. — Having thus
sketched a form which embodies aU the more important specializations common to all the
leading types of Araclmids, at what appear to be their least specialized stages, we can
now comjmre the existing Arachnids with this form as a measure of their respective
specializations. The task is not easy, inasmuch as every form retains some primitive
features, while others are specialized, and it is not always possible to appreciate the
morphological worth of the different characters so as to be able to say which precedes
the other.
We may at once dismiss the Phalangidae and the Acaridae as undoubtedly the most
specialized Arachnids, and confine our comparison to the Pedipalpi (esp. Thelyphonus),
the Galeodidae, the Scorpionidie, the Araneae, and the Chernetidse. Each of these
retains important characters which have some claim to be primitive.
Thelyphonus and Schizonotus. — This form has retained perhaps the largest number of
the most important primitive characteristics. Schizonotus especially retains the cephalic
lobes, two (iierhaps three) free cejDhalothoracic segments, and the leg-like position of the
pedipalps, which, moreover, have only very rudimentary chelae. Further, only nine
segments of the abdomen are swelled into a distensible sac, with traces of limbs or
stigmata on eight of them. Internally, Thelyphonus retains the largest number of
ostia in the heart and the largest number of alimentary diverticula. On the other
hand, the fusion of the bases of the pedipalps so as to enclose the beak, the enormous
backward development of these bases, squeezing up the sternite of the 3rd segment
with the coxae of its limbs, so that they no longer show on the ventral surface, are
highly specialized characters. In addition, we have to add to this specialization the
sensory character of the 3rd pair of appendages, the highly-developed waist, and the
caudal filament, which, however, may perhaps be a development of an anal cirrus of the
ancestral form.
Galeodidae. — These are primitive in the retention of the cephalic lobes, of three free
cephalotlioracic segments, and of variously-sized portions of the tergum of the 3rd segment,,
peeping out from under the cej)halic lobes ; further, in the simple form of waist, hardly
disturbing the serial arrangement of the segments ; in the retention of leg-like pedipalps,
of cephalotlioracic tracheae, and of traces of limbs on all the abdominal segments.
Internally, the conditions of the endosternite, a long heart, with two (traces of three)
ostia m the cephalothorax, the paired and separate genital glands are primitive
features.
On the other hand, the Galeodidae are highly specialized in the great size of the
chelicerae, in the approximation of the coxse of the limbs, and consequent obliteration of
the sternites along the whole length of the body, in the swelling of all the abdominal
segments to form a distensible sac.
Scorpions. — The Scorpions have retained the primitive number of segments, with
distinct filamentous remains of the legs of the 2nd abdominal segment (pectines), and
? of the 12th segment (sting), while only seven abdominal segments are distended into-
SECOND SERIES. — Z00L0G1% VOL. VI. 53
402 • ME. H. M. BEENAED ON THE
the vegetative sac. On tlie other hand, they are highly specialized in the character of the
pedipaljis, in the crowding forward of the coxae of the limbs, in the compression of
the whole cephalothoracic, and in the lengthening out of the anal, segments. Internally,
the specialization is seen in the loss of three alimentary diverticula and of all the ostia
of the heart, in the cephalothorax, in the relative positions of the ganglia composing the
central nervous system, in the fusion of the endosternite with the highly specialized
diaphragm, in the loss of the waist, all consequent on the compression of the cephalo-
thorax above mentioned. Further, they are specialized in the forward thrust of the
genital aperture between the coxae of the cephalothoracic legs, in the fusions of the
genital glands of the two sides, and in the backward movement of the eyes along the
cephalic suture.
The AranecB {especially Aviculariid<s). — These are primitive in the even character of
the fusion of the cephalothoracic segments, and consequent relative positions of the
ganglia composing the central nervous system ; in the persistence of sterna on these
segments ; in the leg-like pedipalj)s ; in the ocular tubercle with all the eyes grouped upon
it (Aviculariidae), and in the retention of filamentous limbs on the J-th and 5th abdominal
segments.
On the other hand, they are highly specialized in the profound structural modifications
of the whole abdominal region ; in the great reduction of the heart ; in the highly-
complicated endosternite, and in the great backward extension of the oesophagus, so that
the sucking-apparatus is behind the bi'ain.
Pseudoscojyions. — These are perhaps primitive in showing only the very earliest
beginnings of a waist, and in the retention of stigmatic scars along the whole length of the
abdomen. On the other hand, the pedipalps are as highly specialized as those of Scorpio,
the coxae of the limbs meet in the middle line and obliterate the sterna, and those of the
walking-legs are forced back by the enormous development of the coxae of the pedipalps.
Internally, we have the reduction of the heart, the great length of the (functional) hind-
gut, and the distension of all the abdominal segments into a vegetative sac.
It will be seen that these various specializations do not lend themselves to any genea-
logical arrangement. They diverge entirely from one another, and cannot in any way be
deduced the one from the other.
Take, for instance, one character which it appears must have early divided the
Arachnids into two branches, viz. the position of the movable digit of the chelicerae.
In one group the chelicerae remained claw-like, the two distal joints, I believe, fusing
to form the present movable digit ; in the other, the distal joints together made a
pair of pincers. All attempts at grouping, according to any siich single divergence of
specialization, are beset with insuperable difficvilties the moment we take other characters
also into accovmt. By way of example we may take the tendency of the first walking-
legs to become sensory in Galeodes. This tendency prepares us for the highly-developed
sensory charactei'S of the same limb in Thehjphomis, yet it is impossible to deduce Thely-
phonns from Galeodes. Their chelicerae are not formed on the same pattern. The same
difficulty meets one with each character in turn, and compels us to fall back upon the
simpler plan of deducing all separately from the hypothetical racial form.
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 403>
Helation of the Hypothetical Form to other Artliropoda. — This important subject
can only be briefly touched upon. I may perhaps be allowed to suggest a few considera-
tions which I think may serve to elucidate the different origins oi' the Arthropoda.
It seems to me that the contrast above described (p. 388, PI. XXXIV. tig. 17) between
the primitive segmentation of the Arachnida on the one hand, and of the Trilobites and
primitive Crustacea on the other, in adaptation to two different and directly opposite
methods of feeding, suggests that the Hexapods and Myriapods may be intermediate
specializations. In these last-uamed Artlwopods, the first pair* of limbs, like the chelicerse
of Arachnids, moved upward and forward, but, as sensory feelers, they did not require the
powerful muscular attachment necessary for prehensile limbs : hence there wei*e no
cephalic lobes. The next two pairs of limbs were specialized as chewing-jaws within the
mouth-aperture, while the fourth pair might either be free to do the same or fuse with
the under-lip to form a compound labium. The anterior position of the mouth would
render it not easy for many pairs of limbs to function as jaws ; in order to enable even
two or three pairs to do so, the anterior segments have had to be so compressed, that
a distinct region, the head, has been formed.
We thus have the Hexapods with an initial specialization of segments differing from
that either of the Arachnids or of the Crustacea. Whereas in the former there was a
backward and dorsal distortion of the 1st segment, and in the latter a ventral bending
of the 1st segment, in tlie Hexapods the first four segments were merely longitudinally
compressed in order to allow the limbs of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th segments to function as
jaws round an anterior mouth-aperture. This applies also to the Myriapods, but in them
we find a varying number and different arrangement of limbs functioning as jaws.
This difference between the Myriapods would thus separate them entirely from the
Hexapods and also from one another.
One other difference between the Arachnids, the Crustacea, and the Hexapoda appears
to me to be fundamental. If my deduction of tracheal invaginations from acicular
glands prove correct it would suggest different origins for the limbs in these three
derivatives of the Chsetopoda.
I would deduce the Crustacean limb from the Annelidan paraj)odinm by ventral
displacement, so that the ventral jmrapodia became the chewing-jaws, the dorsal the
swimming (and ultimately walking) limbs, which carried cirri (exopodites) and gills
(ej)ipodites). The dorsal portion of the limbs probably long continued as swimming-
plates, during which time their special groups of sette were dispersed, wliile the supporting
aciculae of the original parapodia were lost (see, however, footnote, p. 380). On the ventral
portion of the limbs the seta? may have furnished the bristle-like teeth and other hairs.
(PI. XXXIV. fig. 18, A.)
The ancestors of the Arachnids, like those of the Crustacea, ajipear to have developed
the dorsal parapodia into the walking-legs. But these limbs probably passed through no
flat swimming stage. The ventral parapodium disappeared or became merged in the
coxal joint of the more developed limb. The acicular gland of the dorsal branch as it
became a long limb degenerated, but that of the ventral and less specialized branch
persisted as the tracheal invagination (PI. XXXIV. fig. 18, B). This figure is not
63*
404 MR. H. M. BEENARD ON THE
altogether an imaginary drawing. While closely watching an Epeira in a bottle,
protruding and retracting its spinnerets, I noticed that in their most protruded condition
they had the shape represented in this figure. The spinning-glands might thus well be
the setiparous sacs of the original setae at the tips of the branches of the parapodia.
This origin of the limbs will explain the two series of glands on each side, above referred
to (p. 383), one opening at the ends of limbs or laterally, and the other near the median
line. In this way we might have spinning-glands placed distally on the limbs, tracheae
derived from the specialized aciciilar glands of vanishing parapodia laterally along the
ventral surface, and spinning- and cement-glands near the median line.
Turning lastly to the Hexapods and Myriapods, we find that the leg can be deduced
from the venti'al parapodium, while the dorsal parapodium disappeared, leaving, however,
the acicvilar gland as a tracheal invagination, and the setiparous areas either scattered as
hairs or persisting in areas (pupa of Orgia antiqua) or partly developing into stink-
glands (foramina repugnatoria of the Myriapods). PI. XXXIV. fig. 18, C, is not so
unlike the section of a Lepidopterovis larva in which the stump-like legs are armed at
their distal ends with numerous hooked setae. Here, again, as in the case of the
Arachnids, we should have the acicular glands only persisting where a parapodium has
vanished.
These three possible origins of the trunk appendages of the chief divisions of the
Arthropods are as distinct as are the specializations of the anterior segments with their
appendages for the purposes of feeding above suggested.
I am thus disposed to look upon the Crustacea, the Arachnida, the Hexapoda, and the
Myriapoda as distinct specializations of a Chaetopod Annelidan type, and in no way
deducible the one from the other.
REFERENCES.
1. Balfouk. — Notes on the Development of the Araneina. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. xx. 1880.
2. Beck, Miss. — Description of the Muscular and Eadoskeletal Systems of Scorpio. Trans. Zool. Soc.
xi. p. 311. 1885.
3. Benham. — Description of the Muscular and Eudoskeletal Systems of Limulus. Trans. Zool. Soc.
xi. p. 339. 1885.
4. Bernard. — The Apodidse. ' Nature ' Series. London, 1893.
5. Bernard. — The Apodemes of Apus, and the Endophragmal System of Astacus. Ann. & Mag.
Nat. Hist., July 1892.
6. Bernard. — Some Observations on the Relations of the Acaridae to the Arachnida. Journ, Linn.
Soc, Zool. xxiv. p. 279. 1892.
7. Bernard. — An Endeavour to show that the Tracheae of the Arthropoda arose from Setiparous Sacs.
Zool. Jahi-b. Abth. Anat. Bd. 5. 1892.
8. Bernard. — Additional Notes on the same subject. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xiii. 1894.
9. Bernard. — Tne Head of Galeodes, and the Procephalic Lobes of Arachnidan Embryos. Zool.
Anzeiger, no. 426. 1893.
10. Bernard. — Notes on the Chcrnetida\ Journ. Linn. Soc, Zool. xxiv. 1893.
11. Bernard. — Notes on some of the Digestive Processes in the Arachnids. Journ. R. Micro. Sci. 1893.
12. Bernard. — The Coxal Glands of Scorpio. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xii. p. 55. 1893.
13. Bernard. — The Endosternite of Sco/yio, &c. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xiii. 1894.
[
COMPARATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OP THE GALEODID^. 405
14. BEENARD.^-Latcral Eyes of the Galpoclid». Anu. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xiii. 1891.
15. Bernard. — Vestigial Stigmata in the Arachnida. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xiv. 1894.
16. Bertkau. — Uber den Bau und die Function des sog. Leber bei den Spinnen. Arch, mikro. Anat.
xxiii. p. 214.
17. Bertkau, — Uber den Verdauungsapparat der Spinnen. Arch, fiir mikro. Anat. xxiv. 1885.
18. Bertkau. — Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Sinnesorgane der Spinnen. Arch, mikro. Anat. xxvii.
p. 589.-
19. Bertkau. — Uber die Coxaldriisen der Arachniden. SB. Niederrh. Ges. 1885.
20. Bertkau. — Uber Sinnesorgane in den Tastern und dem ersten Beinpaar der Solpugiden. Zool.
Anz. 15 Jg. 1892.
21. BiRULA. — Zur Kenntniss der Russischen Galeodiden. Zool. Anz. 13 Jg. 1890.
■22. Birula. — Einiges iiber den Mitteklarm der Galeodiden. Biol. Centralbl. xi. 1891.
23. Birula. — Untersuchungcn iiber den Bau der Geschlechtsorgane bei den Galeodiden. Horse Soc.
Ent. Ross. t. xxviii. p. 289. 1894.
24. Blanchard. — Les Arachnides. L'Organisation du Regne animal.
25. Claparede. — Etude sur la circulation du sang chez les Aranees du genre Lycosa. Mem. Soc. Phys.
Geneve, xvii. pt. 1. 1863.
26. Croneberg. — Uber ein Entwickelungsstadium von Galeodes. Zool. Anz. 10 Jg. 1887.
27. Croneberg. — Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Baues der Pseudoscorpione. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou,
t. ii. 1888.
28. Croneberg. — Die Mundtheile der Arachniden. Arch. Naturgesch. 1880, p. 285.
29. Daday. — Iiber den Circulatiousapparat der Pseudoscorpione. Term. Piizetek, iv. p. 331. 1881.
30. Dahl. — Das Gelior- und Geruchsorgan der Spinnen. Arch, mikro. Anat. xxiv. 1885.
31. DuFOUR, L. — Anatomic, Physiologic, et Histoire naturelle des Galeodes. Mem. presentes Acad.
Sci. Paris, vol. xvii. 1862.
32. Gaubert. — Reclierches sur les Arachnides. Ann. Sci. Nat. serie 7, t. xiii. 1892.
33. Hansen, H. J. — Organs and Characters of Arachnids. Copenhagen, 1893.
34. Herbst. — See Lichtenstein.
35. Jaworowski. — Die Entwickelung der sog. Lunge bei den Arachniden. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. Iviii.
1894.
36. KiNGSLEY. — The Classification of the Arthropoda. Tuft's College Studies, no. 1. 1894.
37. KiNGSLEY. — The Embryology of LimuJus. Journ. Morph. 1893.
38. V. Kennel. — Die Verivands.chaftsverhaltnisse der Arthropoden. Sch. naturf. Gesell. Univ. Dorpat,
vi. 1891.
39. v. Kennel. — Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Stuttgart, 1893.
40. KiscHiNouYE, K. — On the Development of Araneina. Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Japan, vol. iv.
1890.
41. Kittary, M. — Anatomische Untersuchungcn der gemeinen und furchtlosen Sulpuga. Bull. Soc.
Imp. Nat. Moscou, vol. xxi. 1848.
42. Koch, C. — Die Arachniden, xv. 1848.
43. Lankester, E. Ray. — Limidus vin Axa.Q\\md. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. xxi. 1881.
44. Lankester, E. Ray. — Notes on certain points in the Muscular and Endoskcletal Systems of
Limulus and Scorpio. Trans. Zool. Soc. xi. p. 372. 1885. ■
45. Lankester and Bourne. — Lateral and Central Eyes of Scorpio and Limulus. Quart. Journ.
Micro. Sci. xxiii. 1883.
46. Laurie, M. — The Embryology of a Scorpion. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. xxxi. 1890.
47. Laurie, M. — The Morphology of the Pedipalpi. Journ. Linn. Soc, Zool. xxiv. 1894.
48. Lichtenstein and Herbst. — Naturg. Insecten, Gattuugen Solpuga und Phalangiurn. Berlin, 1797.
49. LiNDSTRoM. — See Thorell.
406 MK. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
50. LoMAN. — Altes und ueues iiber das Nephi'idium (die Coxaldriise) der Arachniden. Bijd. tot de
Dierkunde, xiv. Amsterdam, 1887.
51. Macleod. — Recherehes sur la Structure et la Signification de I'Appareil respiratoire des Arachnides,
Arch. Biol. v. 1884.
52. Macleod. — La Structure de I'Intestin anterieur des Arachnides. Bull. Acad. Belg. serie 3, viii.
p. 378. 1884.
53. Macleod. — Sur la presence d'une Glande coxale chez les Galeodes. Tom. cit. p. 655. 1884.
54. Metschnikokf. — Embryologie des Scorpions. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. Bd. 21. 1871.
55. Metschnikoff. — Entvvickelungsgeschichte der Chelifer. Zeitschr. wiss. Zool. Bd. 21. 1871.
56. Michael. — British Oribatidaj. Ray Society.
57. Murray. — Economic Entomology. South Kensington Mus. Sci. Handbook.
58. Newport. — On the Nervous System of the Macrourous Arachnids. Phil. Trans, vol. cxxxiii,
1843.
59. PococK. — Liphistius and its bearings upon the Classification o£ Spiders. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. x.
1892.
60. PococK. — Notes on the Morphology of the Arachnida. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. xi. 1893.
61. St. Remy. — Contributions a TEtude du Cerveau chez les Arthropodes tracheates. Poitiers, 1890.
62. ScHiMKKYiTCH, W. — Btudes sur 1' Anatomic de I'Epeire. Ann. Sc. Nat. serie 6, xvii. 1884.
63. ScHiMKEviTCH, W. — Ubcr Bau und Entwickelung des Endosternites der Arachniden. Zool. Jb.
Abth. Auat. viii. 1894.
64. Schneider. — Systeme stomatogastrique des Araneides. Tabl. Zool. ii. 1892.
65. Simmons, O. L. — Development of Lungs of Spiders. Amer. Journ. Sci. xlviii. 1894.
66. Simon, E. — Les Arachnides de France. Vol. vii. 1879.
67. Stecker. — Anatomisches und histologisches iiber Gibbocellum. Arch. fUr Naturg, 42 Jg. 1876,
68. Spencer, W. B. — The Anatomy of Pentastomum teretiusculum, Baird. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci,
xxxiv. 1892.
69. Strubell. — Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Pedipalpen. Zool. Anz. 15 Jg. 1892.
70. Sturany, R. — Die Coxaldriisen der Arachnoideeu. Arb. Zool. lust. Wien, ix. 1891.
71. Tarnani. — Die Genital-Orgaue des Thelyphonus. Biol. Centralbl. ix. 1889-90.
72. Thorell and Lindstrom. — On a Silurian Scorpion from Gotland. K. Vet.-Akad. Handl. 1885.
73. Wagner, J. — Die Embryonalentwickelung von Ixodes calcaratus, Bir. Arb. Zool. Lab. Imp. Univ,
Petersburg, no. 5. 1894.
74. Wagner, W. — La Mue des Araignees. Ann. Sci. Nat. serie 7, vi. 1888.
74 a. Wasmann. — Anatomic der Spinnen. Abh. nat. Ver. Hamburg, 1846, p. 133.
75. Walter, A. — Transkaspische Galeodiden. Zool. Jahrb. Abth. Syst. Bd. iv. p. 1095. 1889.
76. Winkler, W. — Anatomic der Gamasiden. Arb. Zool. Inst. Wien, t. vii. 1888. (? 1886-87.)
Supplementary List.
77. Bernard. — Spinning-glands in Phrynus. Journ. Linn. Soc, Zool. no. 161, p. 272. 1895.
*78. Brauer, a. — Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Entwickelungsgeschichte des Scorpions. Zeitschr. wiss,
Zool. Bd. lix. 1895.
*79. PuRCELL, F. — Note on the Development of the Lungs, Entapophyses, Tracheae, and Genital Ducts
in Spiders. Zool. Anz. Oct. 14, 1895.
* The last two papers were not seen by me in time to be dealt with as fully as the important conclusions arrived
at by their authors require. I must content myself with stating my conviction [and this applies also to Wagner's
paper (73)] that all conclusions based upon transitional phenomena in the development of single speciaUzed types
will have ultimately to be tested by a prdfounder and more extended comparative study of existing forms, including
their many instructive generic and specific variations.
COMPAEATIYE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 4!07
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Plate XXVII.
Fig. 1. A specimen of Cleobis, dorsal aspect to sho\v the metamerism. 3, 4, 5, 6, cephalothoracic
segments. I-X abdominal segments. Immediately behind the cephalic lobes {d), a pair
of triangular selerites represents the remains of the tergum of the 3rd segment (3). The
tergum of the 4th segment (4), transformed into a pair of solid rods, which anteriorly
hold up the cephalic lobes, and posteriorly are continued in the lateral walls as strong
pillars, rising from the ventral skeletal framework (c/. PI. XXVIII. fig. 15, r). The terga of
5 and 6 differ in no important respect from those of the abdominal segments. Flexible
membranes form the sides of the body, a, specialized area of the cephalic lobes.
2. Side view of the same, showing the flattened cephalic lobes characteristic of Cleobis. The
eyes project from a slight forehead-like bend of the anterior edge of the cephalic lobes.
The rod-like formation of the tergum of the 4th segment supports the posterior edge
of the cephalic lobes. The sides of the body are covered with a flexible membrane
through which muscle- strands can be seen. The lateral eye is on the specialized area (a).
3. Sketch of the cephalic lobes of Solpui/a paludicolla, Pocock, showing the strong suture and
the projecting ocular tubercle. The tergum of the 3rd segment, only partly covered by the
paired cephalic lobes. The supporting rods (tergum of the 4th segment) nearly meet in
the middle line.
4 . Part of the anterior dorsal surface of Galeodes caspius, Birula.
5. Lateral view of the same region in Galeodes arabs, C. Koch, showing the cephalic lobes at an
angle with the tergum of the 3rd segment, a large portion of which remains uncovered in
this genus.
€ & 7. Dorsal and lateral views of the same region in Rhax termes. The tergum of the 3rd segment
reduced to a very narrow border behind the short, round cephalic lobes.
8. A, B, C, D. Diagrams to show the possible origin of the cephalic lobes (cl) as lateral portions
of the 1st segment (1) shifted on to the dorsal surface {ds) above the labrum (L), owing to
the translocation of the 1st pair of appendages [ch) from a lateral to a preoral position.
The ocular tubercle is the remains of the old dorsal surface [ds] (cf. fig. 10). For the develop-
ment of the chelicerje, cf. PI. XXIX. fig. 1, a, b', c' .
9 a. Partly diagrammatic section through Galeodes (traced with camera lucida), showing the
relative sizes and positions of the chelicerje {ch) and the pedipalps {pp). L, the labrum or
beak. 9 6. The same of Scorpio, showing the small size of the chelicerse (ch) as compared
with the pedipalps (pp). The cephalic IoIjcs have shrunk to a flat carapace on each side
beyond the chelicerse. L, labrum ; /j and L, spoon-like processes of the coxae of the 1st
and 2nd legs (appendages 3 and 4) ; ff, section through the gutter on /j. 9 c. The same of
Obisium. I, labium. For the sections through these beaks, cf. PI. XXVIII. figs. 3, 9, 10.
10. Dorsal surface of Palceophorms nuncius, after Thorell and Lindstrum, showing the ocular
tubercle as portion of original dorsal surface {ds), being grown over by the cephalic lobes
{cl).
11. Part of a dissection from the side of Galeodes arabs, right cephalic lobe and right chclicera cut
away. The cephalic lobe is seen to end posteriorly as a blind pocket, resting on the tergum
of the 3rd segment. The median suture («) is seen as a longitudinal ridge projecting
inwards. The inner side of the left chelicera is seen, showing the basal smooth area
408 ME. H. M. BEENARD ON THE
{cf. text, p. 321, and PI. XXIX. figs. 1, a, U, c'). The beak (B) is seen in situ, the right
pedipalp having been removed. st, the strainer composed of bristles, joined together as
shown on PI. XXVIII. fig. 6. /, flabellum.
Fig. 12. Transverse section through a Galeodes (? Rhax) , showing the blind pockets of the cephalic
lobes (c/). m.ch, muscles of the chelicerse, which fill up the cephalic lobes, s, suture
between the cephalic lobes, e, endosternite, on which lie the elevator muscles of the
pedipalps, and the mid-gut. n, nerve-cords, eg, coxal glands, tr, trachea near the stigmata.
13. The posterior end of a Rhax, showing the anal segment, as if surrounded by a large tergite.
The anus, indicated by an asterisk, is quite ventral in this genus [cf. PI. XXIX. fig. 6).
14. The ventral surface of the first three segments of a Solpuga. The beak seen from below. The
chitinous plate (shaded) supporting the labium is seen to be a continuation of the fused
sternites between the coxse of the pedipalps {/rp) and of the 1st pair of legs (/;). st, the
strainer seen from below, as in horizontal section, br, the feathered bristles on the labium
{cf. fig. 11). sp, rigid sensory process on the coxse of the pedipalps.
15. Ventral surface of a Galeodes, showing the meeting of the coxae in the middle line' along the
whole length of the body, completely obliterating the sterna, with the exception of the plate
supporting the labium {cf. fig. 14) and the triangular piece between the last pair of legs.
The paired sternal areas of the abdominal segments are the remains of limbs which have
vanished, the coxae of which also met in the middle line {cf. text, p. 328, and PI. XXIX.
figs. 6-11). 5^^^, stigmatic aperture. Remains of sternites shaded, la, remains or traces
of abdominal appendages, go, genital operculum.
16. The ventral surface of a Scorpio {Palaninmis) showing the approximation of the coxae and
obliteration of the sterna in the first four segments. The true sternites (shaded) persist on
all the following segments, excepting where covered by the genital opercula or lost in the
specialization of the tail, la, the areas marking the former presence of appendages.
17. The ventral surface of a Thelyphonus, showing the fusion of the coxae of the pedipalps {pp) ;
the position of the beak is indicated by dotted lines. The sternal plate supporting the labium
persists, enclosed between the fused pedipalps {cf. sections, PI. XXVIII. fig. 14, Ir), and rujis
back to join the sternum of segment 3, which forms a fold under the anterior end of the
large sternite of segment 4. The limbs (/,) belonging to segment 3 have also been squeezed
out of the ventral surface, apparently by the enormous backward development of the coxae of
the pedipalps. A small oval sclerite indicates the sternite of segment 5, and sternite 6 is
well marked. On the abdomen the sternites persist, from that of segment ii. (covered by the
genital operculum, //o) to the commencement of the " tail " segments. Well-marked sternites
persist in segment 8, which in Scorpio forms part of the tail.
18. The venti-al surface of Phrynus. The anterior prolongation of the sternum (sternites 1 and 2)
is not squeezed up between the coxse of the pedipalps, but is forced downward by the
meeting of these coxae above it. The sternites of the three posterior cephalothoracic
segments are clear, but divided (? folded) into areas. The appendages forming the genital
opercula persist as the so-called " penis."
Plate XXVIII.
Fig. 1. Ventral surface of the cephalothorax of a young Epeirid just hatched and cleared in cedar-oil,
also showing areas marked off on the sternal plate as in Phrynus, the chief differences
being the absence of the median row of areas and the presence of the clearly- marked
sternum of the 3rd segment, which in the Pedipalpi is almost {Phrynus, PI. XXVII. fig. 18).
or quite {Thelyphonus, PI. XXVII. fig. 17) suppressed.
COMPAEATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^E. 409
Fig. '2. Veutral surface of an unspecified Psendoscorpion, showing the complete obliteration of the
sternites on the ccphalothoracic segments.
3. Section through the beak of Galeodes near the line a-h (fig. 5), showing its fusion with the
coxas of the pedipalps {pp) ; m, the flexible membrane between the bases of the chelicerfe and
above the beak, sa, sucking-apparatus ; Ir, supporting rod of the labium (cf. PI. XXVII.
fig. IJ'), attached by muscles, fc, flexible cliitin.
4. Section through tip of the beak near c-d (fig. 5 ) ; the labrum (L) has a thick solid chitinous
dorsal keel, the labium (/) is divided into two soft lobes (PI. XXVII. fig. 14).
5. Longitudinal section through the beak. The sucking-apparatus is confined to the beak, and
consequently anteriorly to the central nerve-mass (shaded). a-b and c-d, approximate
lines of section of figs. .3 and 4. m, the membrane shown in fig. .3.
6. Portion of the straining arrangement of bristles, which projects from the tip of the labrum,
covering the mouth-aperture. It is composed of plumose setaj joined by trabeculse. pic/f
pigment, travelling uj) through the thick chitin {cf. PL XXIX. figs. 16, 17).
7. Sagittal section through tlie mouth of Fhryims. The labrum L is much retluced ; the labium
is little more than the sternal supporting rod, Ir. The sucking-apparatus is both in front
of and behind the central nerve-mass (shaded). m, flexible membrane between bases of
chelicerae, the position of which is indicated [ch), although they could not appear in a true
median section.
8. Sagittal section through the mouth of a Spider ; labrum (L) and labium (/) bent downward ;
the sucking-apparatus almost entirely behind the central nerve-mass ; ch, as in last
figure.
9. Diagrammatic section through the mouth of Scorpio ; the sucking-apparatus is confined to the
beak, which, however, is much shortened. /, the spoon-like processes of the first leg,
/[, to prevent the escape of juices crushed out of the prey [cf. p. 357 & PI. XXVII.
fig. 9 6).
10. Diagrammatic section through the beak of a Pseudoscorpion ; the sucking-apparatus is concen-
trated in the posterior end of the beak.
11. The same of Tlielyphonus, the sucking-apparatus extending along the beak as in Galeodes.
12, 13, 14. Three cross sections through the beak of Thdyphonus. 12 near the tip; 13 at the
beginning of the pumping-apparatus ; and 14 at its junction with the body. It is held
between the fused coxal joints of the pedipalps {pp), which together make a kind of trough
in 12, from which the juices of the animals crushed by the chelicerte {ch) are sucked.
It, the supporting rod of the labium, the persistent sternum of the 1st and 2nd segments
{cf. PL XXVII. fig. 14). st, the fine straining-bristles lining the inside of the mouth.
15. Ventral chitinous framework of Galeodes arabs dissected out and cleaned with caustic
potash. (The beak and the endosternite are placed in line at the side, fig. 15 ff.)
In addition to the transverse folds between the coxae, are seen the median folds, which
may be the remains of sterna pressed up into the body by the approximation of the
coxse in the middle line : a pair of chitinous rods {chr) at the inner ends of the ccphalo-
thoracic stigmata (stiy) support the endosternite {cf. figs. 16, 19). A pair of lateral
rods (r) form the ventral attachments of the modified tergites of the 4th segment {cf.
PL XXVII. figs. 1-6). b, the buttresses upon which the limbs rotate, chf, chitinous
folds, which serve to hold the nerves to the last pair of legs in place [cf. PL XXXI. fig, 6).
(', attachment of the right half of the endosternite. Ir, labial supporting rod.
15 a. The endosternite removed to one side, but in a line with its proper position on the skeletal
framework (fig. 15). p, fibrous plate, attached by tendons to the exo- and eudo-skeleton.
eg, main duct of the coxal gland, which appears to end on p. L, labrum or beak.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 54
410 ME. H. M. BERNAED ON THE
Fi^. 16. Side view of the endosternite, fibrous plate {p), the supporting rod (chj-), and the eoxal
gland (cff). e, point of origin of rigiit half of the endosternite.
17. From a section through e (fig. 16), showing the endosternite as an infolding of the cuticle.
18. Transverse section through the endosternite, showing the interlocking of the right and left
halves [e^, C;) in the middle line and the ftision with the supporting rod {chr) [cf. figs. 15,
16). The fibrous tissue (ft), binding the portions together, stains deeply. The nature of
the endosternite as a chitiuous infolding is apparent (cf. fig. 17).
19. Longitudinal section through the fibrous plate (p).
Plate XXIX.
Fig. 1. Diagrams to suggest an origin for the two types of Arachnidan cheliceras from an original
3-jointed limb, a, b, c, is the order of development for the type found in the Spiders
and Pedipalpi. a, b' , the same for that of Scorpio, Phalangids, and Pseudoscorpions. a, b' , c' ,
for Galeodes, Gamasus, and other Acari. In c , str represents the position of the stridu-
lating apparatus found in certain Galeodidse {cf. text, p. 322). 1, 2, 3, the three joints and
their modifications, o, ocular tubercle, cl, cephalic lobe.
2 (twisted round by mistake). Section through the tip of a cheliccra of P//?'yMi<,s, showing what
may be a trace of a lost joint, 7. fc, flexible chitin ; set, setae, ? homologous with the spinning-
glands of Pseudoscorpions, and poison-glands of Spiders, opening in practically the same spot.
3. Side aspect of the anterior end of a small Galeodes, showing the relative sizes and positions
of the pedipalps (^pp) and 1st pair of legs, also the enormously long sensory hairs, only a
very few of which are drawn, ol, joint containing the olfactory organ at the tip of the
pedipalps [cf PI. XXXI. figs. 10-17).
4. The same of a Rhax, showing the relative sizes and position of the same limbs. The terminal
joints of the pedipalps {ol) are immovable, le, lateral eyes.
5. Hypothetical diagram, showing the character and position of the three first limbs in the
primitive form [cf. fig. 14) .
6. Ventral aspect of Rlia.v to show the sequence between the coste of the cephalo thoracic limbs
and the paired ventral plates of the abdominal segments.
7. To show the continuity between the genital operculum [go] of a Galeodes and the cephalo-
thoracic limbs ; the chitinous folds {cf) of the former continue the interarticular folds
(between coxa and trochanter) of the cephalothoracic limbs (cf. fig. 11).
8. Ventral abdominal surface of a Galeodes intrepidus, Savigny, in the British Museum (abdomen
not distended), showing the ventral plates (limb-areas), continuing the plates forming the
genital opercula.
9. The same of a specimen of G. fat alls (abdomen somewhat distended), showing the sequence of
the paired plates (/a).
10. The ventral median line of a Galeodes (?sp.), also in the British Museum, showing in more
detail the characters of the limb-areas, ffo, genital opercula ; stiff. o, stigmatic opercula.
11, 12, 13. Hypothetical restorations of abdominal limbs to explain the position of the stigmata.
11. Galeodes. The stigmata on the posterior faces of the coxae (5//^.o = stigmatic opercula)
have been brought in towards the middle line by the bending backward of the limbs.
12. Scorjjio. The limbs retained their lateral positions, but sloped backward. 13. Thely-
phonus or Phri/nus. The spinning-glands {r/ff) in the genital limb (go) (" penis " of
Phrynus) appear to be homologous with the glands {gy) on the same limbs in Galeodes.
eg, aperture of the coxal gland; stig, stigmata, persistent or aborted.
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID^. Ill
Fig. 14. Hypothetical restoration of the common racial form. L, labrum ; I, labium, the latter being
the sternum of the 1st segment; tliese together formed the primitive beak; 1, cheliccra?,
limbs of 1st segment ; 5/3, .':ind sternite ; 2, pedipalps ; 3, 1st leg. The abdominal limbs
with stigmatic apertures are shown along the whole abdomen, the last pair on segment xii.
probably forming the sting of Scorpio, thereby accounting for the paired poison-glands ( /)(/.)
The dotted lines indicate the number of the abdominal segments subsequently specialize<l
for distension, in two cases leaving a few segments to form a " tail.'' S, Scorpio ; T, Thely-
phonus ; G, Galeodidae and Spiders.
15. Thick portion of the cuticle, showing the outermost refractive or glassy layer (//), followed by
many layers of softer laminated chitin, traversed by canals containing deeply staining
protoplasm and pigment. These canals terminate in the glassy layer. The hypodermis-
cells have broken away, leaving small groups of deeply-staining points, which are the
proximal ends of the protoplasmic processes traversing the chitinogenous layer. On the
probable nuclear character of these processes, cf. text, p. 331.
16. Cuticle from the pedipalp of a Galeodes. Fusiform masses of olive-green pigment {pii/) send
up processes which traverse the chitinogenous layers, similar fusiform masses being already
incorporated in the cuticle. (/, thin glassy layer.
17. Portion of the thick and especially hard and brittle cuticle in which the fine canals ti'aversing
the chitinogenous layers become wavy before tapering off into the glassy layer {ff).
Plate XXX.
Fig. 1. Portion of thick cuticle of Euscorpio. y, the very tliick, clear, glassy layer ; h, hard refractive
layers ; ch, softer chitinogenous layei-s. On the blind canal [sp] traversing the cuticle,
cf. text, p. 334.
2. Lateral flexible membrane of Scorpio, g, glassy layer forming papillfe, the softer staining
laminae [ch) thrown into folds.
3. Section through flexible cuticle of abdomen of Lycosa (highly magnified), showing the folding
of the glassy layer (g), rows of pores [p) in the furrows ; the outer portion of the chitino-
genous layers [ch) show no stratification, but are traversed by canals leading (?) to the pores.
4. Method of suspension of a hair by the glassy layer, which also forms the outer covering of the
hair, and lines the chamber in which the butt-end of the hair is suspended ; this end
is attached all round by a ring of radiating and deeply staining fibres {cf. fig. 7 b).
5. The same, when the chitinogenous layers are thin.
6. Flexible membrane of abdomen of Galeodes, showing the regular folding of the glassy layer,
and the glassy chandler which prevents the hair from being thrust into the soft tissues.
7 a. To show the canal (c) which keeps the chamber above the fibres (//) in communication witli the
body-cavity. This canal appears chiefly in long sensory hairs on the pedipalps and first legs
{cf PI. XXXII. figs. 13, 14).
7 b. The radiating staining-fibres attaching the chitinogenous layer of the hair to the chitinogenous
layer of the cuticle. These appear to be especially numerous in the long sensory hairs.
8. A spine from a limb of Galeodes, showing its suspension bj' the glassy layer, and the spear-
head arrangement to prevent the hair from being thrust into the tissues.
9. Diagrammatic longitudinal section reconstructed from serial sections, showing the longitudinal
[dim, vim) and dorso-ventral muscles {dv) ; m (shaded) indicates the musculature of the
chelicerse confined to the cephalic lobes ; eg, aperture of the coxal gland : e, point of origin
of the endosteruite ; stig, stigma ; r, ventral point of attachment of the rod supporting tlie
posterior edge of the cephalic lobes [cf. PI. XXVII. figs. 1-7) ; D, the diaphragm.
54*
412 MK. H. M. BERNARD ON THE
Fig. 10. Diagram illustrating some of the muscles of the eudosternite ; ep, elevator of the pedipalps;
p, fibrous plate; e, eudosternite (c/. PI. XXVIII. lig. 16 and text, p. 339).
11. Interual aspect of ventral abdominal surface of Galeodes arabs. On the left, the aiTangement
of the ventral longitudinal muscle-bands [vim], on the right the ovary (?) {ov). Anteriorly
is the diaphragm (D) ; h, aperture for the heart ; in, for the intestine. The other apertures
in the diaphragm are for tracheae (c/. figs. 13 aud 14) ; the median nerve swells into a
ganglion {abg) ; the lateral nerves (h) belong to the genital gland.
12. Muscle-fibres iu section, each fibre surrounded by a fine connective-tissue sheath.
13. Lateral view of the main tracheal trunks of the left side, the pericardial trachea [pet) being
median.
14. View of the abdominal tracheal system, with the exception of the pericardial trachea, which,
however, has 8 points of connection [pet'), viz. from a pair of branches iu the 1st segment,
and from a single brauch on the right side iu the 2ud segment. The ventral ends of the
dorso-ventral muscles [dv) attached in the median line are shown cut through. On the right,
part of the maiu tracheal trunk is omitted in order to show the tracheae supplying the cuticle
and the ventral longitudinal and lateral muscles.
15. Pericardial trachea [pet), aerating the heart {h) ; the dorsal longitudinal [dim) and the circular
(lateral) muscles (hn). For the origins of this system, see figs. 13 and 14 {pet').
16. Part of a transverse section through a pair of abdominal stigmata, m, the median fold of skin
to which, anteriorly to the stigmata [cf. fig. 14), the dorso-ventral muscle is attached.
Small muscle-bands on each side appear to dilate the stigmatic apertures [stiff). The stig-
matic combs {co) appear, in situ, cut through iu the section.
17 « & 17 6. Two figures explaining the histology of the tracheal tubes, ff, the glassy layer of the
cuticle continued as the lining of the tube, under which occurs the staining chitinogenous
layers (ch), which is greatly thickened to form the spiral hoops {cf. fig. 17 i, with PI. XXXI.
hg. 7, which shows the thickening of the laminae of the chitinogenous layers to form the lens
of the eye) ; ep, epithelium ; n, nuclei of epithelial cells.
18. Longitudinal section through a cephalothoracic stigma of a Rhax. The sette modified to
form a protective sieve. The flat-headed hairs within the aperture appear to be open at
their tips, and may be olfactory.
19. An abdominal stigma of the same animal appearing in a sagittal section. It is seen well pro-
tected by the stigmatic fold. Digestive tubules [dt) are seen penetrating into the fold.
Plate XXXI.
Fig. 1. Nearly median longitudinal section through Rhax. ot, optic tubercle; dm, divaricator
of the left chelicera cut through ; ^3, apodeme formed by the posterior portion of the
cephalic lobes resting on the 3rd tergite ; niff, outline of mid-gut ; ce, oesophagus ;
en, central nerve-mass ; b, buttress round which the left pedipalp rotates ; eg, convolutions
of the main ducts of the coxal glands; e, eudosternite; D, diaphragm ; h, heart ; /r, tracheal
tube.
2. Sagittal section through the central nerve-mass (the hue details of which can only be dia-
grammatically suggested), showing the relative jjosition of the principal ganglionic centres.
on, optic nerve ; ch, nerve to the chelicera ; pp, ditto to the pedipalp ; 1, 2, 3, 4, ganglia of
the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th legs ; ce, oesophagus.
3. Showmg the relative positions of the same ganglionic centres iu different Arachnids.
a. Spider, showing least specialization (i. e. forward and upward tilting) ; b, Gultodes ;
c, Scorpio ; d, outline of central nerve-mass of Phalanyium ; e, relative positions of ganglionic
COMPAEATIVE MOEPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODID.^. 413
centres in a Pseudoscorpion ; o, optic; ch, cheliceral; pp, pedipalpar ganglion 1, 2, 3, 4,
ganglia of the nerves to the legs.
Fig. 4. Dissection showing the relations of the nerve mass to the endosternite (e) ; eg, part of the
spongy terminal portion of the coxa! gland; my, the mid-gut with its diverticula; on, optic
nerve; ch, nerve to chelicera ; pp, double nerve topedipal]); 1, double nerve to 1st leg;
ckr, chitiuous rod (c/. PI. XXVIII. fig. 15).
5. The same, with the heart (/<) ; the mid-gut {mg) raised off the endosternite, showing the blind
pocket of the oesophagus (cp) ; on, optic nerve; ch, cheliceral nerve; ch' , nerve to cheliceral
muscles; e, endosternite; /w_r/', the positions of the lst-3rd mid-gut diverticula, the 3rd cut
shoi't ; eg, part of the terminal portion of the coxal gland.
6. Central nervous system of G. arabs dissected out. L, labral nerves ; ittig, nerve to the stigma ;
chr, chitinous rod {cf. PI. XXVIII. fig. 15) ; eg, position of the principal coils of the coxal
glands ; ab, abdominal ganglion just posterior to the diaphragm ; g, nerve to the genital gland ;
ht ^2' l-i} hi double nerves to the legs ; chf, folds of chitin under which the uerve passes
[cf. PL XXVIII. fig. 15) ; D, position of the diaphragm.
7. Nearly median longitudinal section through the eye. post, posterior ; ant, anterior ; fl, deeply-
staining flexible ring of chitin round the lens, allowing of some movement; i, iris-like fold;
sp, spongy tissue filling the fold and surrounding the eye like a cushion ; b, blood-plasma
and cells; m, connective-tissue membrane cutting off the eye from the rest of the body-
cavity.
8. Much magnified portion of the preceding; /, portion of the lens; hi/, hypodermis layer
secreting the lens ; r, long retinal cells with nuclei ; Ic, canals for the fluid permeating the
whole organ ; sp, spongy tissue in the iris-like fold.
9. Section further in towards the median line cutting the lens almost tangentially ; c, irregularities
in the outer layers of chitin covering the lens as if it had shrunk ; fl, staining flexible chitin ;
og, ganglion opticum.
10. View of the tip of a pedipalp of Galeodes arabs.
11. Side view showing the thickenings of the chitin forming a hinge; v, ventral; d, dorsal;
ss, group of specialized sensory cells.
12. Longitudinal section through the tip of a pedipalp; d, dorsal; v, ventral; i, aperture of
invagination ; se, sensory epithelium, shrunk away from the ventral surface of the invagina-
tion ; ten, tendon for opening the lips ; nii, muscle of the same ; m.,, muscle attached to
tendon drawing down the invagination — the tendon is covered with epithelial, and scattered
pigment, cells ; tr, trachea ; n, nerve to the hairs and sensory cells [ss, fig. 1 1) on the
dorsal side of the limb.
13. Section through the tip of a pedipalp cut slantingly, the sensory epithelium (se) (magnified
in 13 a) shrunk away from the cuticle which carries the fine sensory hairs ; i, the cavity of
the invagination.
14. A portion of this cuticle showing the thick longitudinal constituents of the lattice-work ; the
fine transverse elements not shown. The fine sensory hairs are so closely packed that their
tips together form a wavy and ajjparently continuous surface.
15. Ifi, 17. Anterior, posterior, and lateral aspects of the protrusible organ in its protruded con-
dition as seen on a spirit sj)ecimen of G. arabs from Shaloof, near Suez, in the Nat. Hisi.
Mus. S. Kensington.
414 ME. H, M. BEENAED ON THE
Plate XXXII.
Fig. 1. A racquet-orgau, cleared in cedar-oil, showing the zonal arrangement of the interior tissues
nf, the radiating nerve-fibres (fig. 7) ; ret, the reticulum of nerve-fibres, connective tissue,
and blood-lacunae (figs. 5 and G, ret) ; ep, the folded epithelium (figs. 8 and 6, ep) ; we, row of
nerve-endings (figs. 2, 3, G).
2. Section across the outer edge of racquet, showing the aperture of the nerve-endings (we)
along a ridge {br). pr, protective ridge.
3. Section showing the ridges folded together for the protection of the nerve endings.
4. Surface view, showing thickness of the cuticle [cli) along the lateral edges of the racquet-organ
and the apertures for fine sensory hairs on its surface («/«).
a. Section through the 2nd zone, fig. 1. ret, the reticulum of blood-lacunae, nerve-fibres cut
across, and tracheae ; ch, thick chitinogenous layer with outer glassy layer [y] ; b, blood-
spaces ; n, nerves cut transversely ; tr, tracheae.
6. Optical section in the plane of the organ showing transition from the reticulum [ret) to the
folded epithelium [ep) and from that to the outermost zone of nerve-endings [ne) [cf. fig. 1).
7. Nerve-fibrils with long spindle-shaped nuclei from the innermost zone.
8. Hypothetical transverse section, based upon a reconstruction of optical horizontal sections.
The folded epithelium shown as a single layer, nf, nerve-fibres cut across ; b, the blood-
spaces.
9. Surface view of the edge of a racquet of Rhax. The bolster-ridge [br] along which the nerve-
endings open has evidently been turned down, while the protective fold [pr) has been bent
back and crushed down, thus exposing the bolster-ridge with the nerve-endings.
10. Section of the tip of the first leg {Rhax), showing one of the rudimentary claws with two
tendons for its protrusion and retraction, the tendons moving in a clear blood-space ; on the
upperside, well protected by connective tissue, are great numbers of long bag-like sensory
cells, as shown in the next figure.
11a. Appearance of the sensory cells of fig. 10; 11 b, the same at the proximal edge of the
sensory area.
12. A thick longitudinal section of 1st leg of a small Galeodes, dorsal aspect, cleared in cedar-
oil in order to examine the sensory cells in situ. They are seen down the centre as minute
dots (? apertures) on the cuticle, which ar-e in connection with peculiar sensory cells seen
through the cuticle (figs. 17 a, \7 b). The place of insertion of every hair is seen to be
surrounded by a special grouping of cells.
13. The cell arrangement round the insertion of a large hair. The nerve-cells and secreting cells
are protected by a wall surrounding the insertion of the hair distally. The next figure, —
14.. Shows the section of a large sensory hair on the 1st leg of a Rhax, — the nerve-cells
and the secreting cells are protected by a kind of roof [ro) ; h, the hair ; rf, the radiating
fibres attached to its butt-end ; c, the canal connecting the chamber above the elastic (?)
fibres with the rest of the body ; se, the secreting cells, which are all thread-like, forming
a bag-like network in which the nuclei are suspended ; b, blood-cells ; n, a nerve-cell (?).
15. Hair from the tip of the 1st leg of Rhax (figured 10) ; owing to its position, the bag-like
reticulum of secreting cells hangs straight down, whereas at the sides of the limb they slope
away in a proximal direction (as in fig. 14).
IG. Large bag-like sensory cells, surrounded by connective tissue ; 16 a, the sensory process
passing through the cuticle. These cells occur along the edges of the dotted area in fig. 12.
17. The appearance of the majority of the sensoi-y cells in the area shown in fig. 12 j 17 b, the
passage of the nerve-ending through the cuticle (diagrammatic).
COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE GALEODIDiE. 415
Fig. 18. Left side of the alimcutary canal dissected from the cephalothora.x of Galeodes arabs. \, 2, 3, 4,
the four pairs of divcrticuh* ; ad, a small accessory diverticulum ; h, heart ; e, upper edge
of endosteruite ; T>, diapliragm.
19. Optical section of one of the above mid-gut diverticula, cleared in cedar-oil. Itn, longitudinal ;
an, circular muscles.
Plate XXXIII.
Fig. 1. Diagram of the alimentary system in the abdomen, to show the position of the dorso-ventral
muscles cut through. The diverticula filling the whole abdomen [cf. fig. 5) have only one
pair of apertures (ap) into the central canal {mg), viz., in the first segment. They, the
diverticula {div), open along the rest of the abdomen into two lateral canals [Ic] ; mat,
Malpighian tubules ; stp, stercoral pocket.
2. A transverse section (camera lucida), taking in a portion of the diaphragm (D), cut tangcntially,
showing the small size of the aperture for the alimentary canal {in); b, the heart;
//•, trachea.
3. Slightly further back (drawn to the same scale), letters as in last figure. dim, dorsal longi-
tudinal mu.scles ; w, neural aperture.
4. Still further back, showing the pair of apertures {ap) of the diverticula into the central canal,
drawn to the same scale ; letters as before. Only a very few of the crowded diverticula
are drawn, and some are drawn empty. n, the neural sinus, continuing the neural arch of
the diaphragm conveying the blood from the cephalotliorax into the abdomen ; the nerve-
strands are in its base, y, genital atrium, the chitinous lining has left the epithelium ;
^^, accessory glands, opening one on each side of the genital aperture, and belonging morpho-
logically to the opercula {cf. yg, PI. XXIX. figs. II, 13) ; cf, chitinous thickening shown in
Plate XXIX. fig. 7, as continuations of the inter-articular fold between coxa and trochanter
of the preceding limhs ; /, faeces.
5. Section of a distended abdomen (camera lucida), the diverticula drawn empty, g, genital glands ;
tr, main trachea {cf. PI. XXX. figs. 13 and 14) ; do, fragment of a dorso-ventral muscle;
vim, ventral longitudinal muscle-band; lin, lateral muscles; /, faical masses in the mid-gut.
6. Section through the waist of a Spider, to show the possibility of constricting the alimentary
canal {in) by means of dorso-ventral muscles, h, heart (artery) ; n, nerve.
7. Transverse section through the posterior end of mid-gut {mg), where the lateral canals (/c)
are closely applied to it on each side (see diagram, fig. I). The mid-gut is surrounded by
circular and longitudinal muscles, outside which are tracheal tubes embedded in a spongy
layer of coagnlum, fluid-passages and ? cells {cf. sp, figs. 8, 9, 11). This spongy mass
surrounding the mid-gut is embraced by the lateral canals (/c), which are joined together
above and below the mid-gut by transverse muscles {tni}. The epithelium {mep) of the lateral
canals where they are in contact with the mid-gut is modified as described (text, p. 360).
The rest of the epithelium is so crowded with food-globules, that the individual cells are
no longer distinguishable. /, fsecal masses ; mal, Malpighian tubules ; tr, tracheae ; n, nerves ;
div, digestive diverticula witli epithelium disorganized by food-globules.
8. Longitudinal section through the junction of the mid-gut and hind-gut of a distended Galeodes.
mg, mid-gut; /ig, hind-gut; .^tp, stercoral pocket; tm, muscles binding the lateral canals on
each side of the mid-gut {cf. fig. 7) ; sp, spongy layer surrounding the posterior end of the
mid-gut. The crowded contents of the mid-gut, hind-gut, and stercoral pocket omitted.
The complicated folding of the chitinous wall of the stercoral [locket is suggested. The
thread-cells (fig. II) outside the commencement of the hind-gut gradually change to a tesselated
epithelium covering the end of the hind-gut and the stercoral pocket.
416 jme. h. m. beenaed on the
Fig. 9. End of mid-gut of a fasting Rhax, jammed against the stercoral pocket {stp), thereby closing
the passage ; letters as before.
10. Longitudinal section through the wall of mid-gut at the wide anterior portion (segments 2 and
3 of fig. 1). Im, longitudinal muscles ; cm, circular muscles. The epithelial cells stand on
a membrane [m) thrown into folds by the contraction of the longitudinal muscles. The
epithelial cells of mid-gut are being traversed by strings of food-globules {fg). Average
length of cell 20 /i.
11. Enlarged portion of fig. 8. mg, mid-gut cells, which near the junction with the hind-gut are 80 yx
long and 3 to 4 /x thick ; long strings of food-globules traverse them, hg, chitin-lined hind-
gut secreted by long, thread-like cells which appear to change into a fine tesselated epithelium
covering the stercoral pocket. /?«, longitudinal muscles; tin, transverse muscles binding
the lateral canals together (fig. 7) ; sjj, spongy layer composed of fluid-passages, cells, and
coagulum ; tr, trachea ; cm, //«', the musculature proper of the mid-gut, a continuation
of the muscles shown in fig. 10.
12. Diagram showing the primitive relations which existed between the diverticula of the alimentary
canal [mgd), the dorso-ventral muscles [dv), the tracheal invaginations {tr) , and the heart (A)
with its ostia. The dotted lines on the right indicate the extent to which this primitive
condition is still traceable in three Arachnids, viz. Thebjphorms, Scorpio, and Galeudes ;
D, the position of the diaphragm. (N.B. This figure should have been on the next Plate.)
Plate XXXIV.
Figs. 1-5. Diagrams of the abdominal alimentary system. 1. Scorpio. 2. Thelyphonm. 3. Obisium.
4. Galeodes. 5. Hypothetical primitive arrangement with at least 7 pairs of diverticula from
which the former can be deduced. In Scorpio the two posterior pairs have been suppressed,
the fifth pair lengthening backward. In Galeodes all but the first pair have been suppressed,
this single pair stretching backward outside the dorso-ventral muscles. In Thelyphomis 4 or
5 pairs persist, the 4th or 5th (?) stretching back inside the dorso-ventral muscles and being
themselves constricted. This process has gone still further in the Pseudoscorpions, reaching
to the 2nd segment, the ' hind-gut' being coiled.
(J. Longitudinal section through the last chamber of the heart of a Rhax, passing through an ostium ;
VI, VII, sixth and seventh abdominal segments ; h, heart ; fc, large cells (?fat cells) ; v, the
posterior vein ; fl, flexible chitin of intersegmental membrane ; cm, muscle-fibres forming
the tunic of the heart, cut through.
7. Ventral aspect of a portion of a heart, dissected out. cm, the circular muscle-fibres shown in
section in last figure ; n, layer of single nerve-fibrils with spindle-shaped nuclei.
8. Diagram of the circulation in the abdomen of Galeodes. The blood, entering the abdomen
through the neural arch of the diaphragm, follows the mid-gut and nerve-strands in the
ventral sinus {vs), from this it escapes on both sides among the mass of digestive diverticula,
reaching the heart after circulating among them ; tr, tracheae near a pair of abdominal
stigmata; g, genital gland; h, heart [cf. Plate XXXIII. fig. 5).
9. Diagram of circulation in the abdomen of Scorpio ; the left half represents a section posterior to
that of the right half; h, the heart, on the right it is discharging blood through a short passage
(artery) among the digestive tubules below the visceral membrane (?«). Lb, lung-book, the
leaves of which are so arranged that blood both from the ventral sinus [vs) and from the
alimentary diverticula can flow out sideways between them. nc, nerve-cord with an
accompanying blood-vessel, which discharges its blood into the ventral sinus (? and among
COMPAliATIVE MOliPHOI.OGY OF THE GALEODID.E. 417
the digestive tubules) . On the left, the visceral membrane is held down dorsally and raised
vcutrally by muscle-fibres, the " veno-pericardial " muscles. The blood-space below and
the pocket above are the remains of the original inter-diverticular spaces [cf. fig. 5).
Dv, portion of a dorso-ventral muscle.
Fig. 10. A portion of the main duct of the coxal gland in G. arahs, highly magnified. The connective-
tissue envelope contains blood-lacunse [b) and tracheie {tr) ; a group of the gland-cells are
seen with dividing nuclei deeply stained, in the other cells the nuclei are vesicular.
11. A few cells of the same more highly magnified, the nuclei measured by eyepiece micrometer.
11 a. A dividing, deeply-stained nucleus, with measurements.
12. A section of the main duct of the coxal gland near the aperture ; the cells are less differentiated,
13. A portion of the spongy mass of tubules developed at the proximal end of the main duct of
the coxal gland {cf. PL XXXI. figs. 4, 5).
14. Portion of the same, highly magnified, be, blood coagulum ; /, tracheae ; p, large solid masses
of protoplasm (? cells) traversed by tracheal tubes.
15. The genital and stigmatic opercula of a specimen of Rhax Kvyserlingii, Pocock (in the British
Museum), g', anterior aperture (?), which may be the genital aperture; g", the ordinary
position of the genital aperture into which the cement-glands open ; stig, the positions of the
stigmata; cf. the sequence ^^, stigi, stig, (Plate XXIX. fig. 11).
16. Portion of a transverse section through an ovary, ep, ovarial epithelium ; m, felt of muscle-
fibres ; /, trachea ; /, follicular membranes, the one on the left is shrunk after the tUscharge
of an egg; em, egg-membrane showing two zones ; y, yolk-granules.
17 A, B. Diagrams to compare the initial modifications of the anterior segments. A, of the
Arachnids; B, of the Crustacea and Merostomata ; p, prostomium. 1, 2, 3, 4, the 1st four
segments. In A a sucking-beak results, while in the latter the appendages can function as
jaws round or within the mouth.
18. Diagram showing in transverse sections the origin of the limbs and tracheaj (or glands) of the
three chief divisions of the Arthropods, from the parapodia and setiparous glands of a
Chsetopod Annelid. A, Crustacea; B, Arachnida ; C, Hexapoda. d, dorsal; v, ventral
branch of the parapodium; a, acicular gland; g, gill; p,v, exopodite ; c, sensory cirrus
(tf. text, pp. 403-404).
SECONU SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 55
.vd
s M] \
"^1
:J \\
V.
A
/^--^^~%
y-.
/.H
9o-
,j' lOU)
w
■1 '/r
A
ii
12
1^'
.Kj\
' w
i \
t
:>h^
.X.
IL.
^■-'^ >
iG
r^
rv
■IT
ViU
"7
n
I 0 1 , O G Y 0 1-'' a iA i . K C' i. ) I •", s
i
i
18
West NewTTuiTi in\>
B(
15
16 • c/"-
10
^/! : U P M 1 J ! . O G Y O P G A 1
Wf-si N'*wrnaij irnfj
Liernard.
Trans, Linn. Soc Ser .'' ZoclVol,
0
:^er'riarcl
^HAriS Lll3N SoC.SiiR 11^ ZoOuVolM PI bO
'~9 ^^
■■'IT
-^lyr >s ?
-^- 1_
..-f
10
-^>^' (if
^kmj
18
;io HP HO LOGY OB' 3 ALE ODE."
/
13
IS
4 V
/ f
<
'\
;>^
'C3> i^
<j;l
I HANS l.INN SOC.ZOOI. SeR 2 _Voi.yi.Pl.34'
;r:;'v^>\ ^
> ."■
\n7
./'r'NyvvT,
/r-'
*) .Ps,^'
i'/T^nS^-V
\ vni
P.I
; 111
^
4^
11
'X.3..i..i..IuJ^''>"*^ ^
:^" '■'V.-.V^
••f' SA
^A:^:
15
.j;?'
10
13
le
.U
c««!
14-
A
B
p.
i.
17
18
vi r
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMOEANDA CONCERNING TRANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has" been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and Gs. to Eellows ; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
wrapper) : —
Wlien Price to the
Vohme. Published. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Series. — Zoology.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 . ,
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 . ,
Part III. 1876 1 8 0 . .
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 . .
Part V. 1877 0 18 0 . ,
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 . ,
Part VII. 1878 1 IG 0 . .
Part VIII. 1879 1 U 0 . ,
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 . .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 . ,
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885 0 G 0 .
Part XV. 1885 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
Part XVIII. 1888 0 2 0 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
Volu
When
Published.
Price to the
Public.
Price to
Fellows.
£
d.
Second Series. — Zoology {continued).
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0
Part II. 1884 1 12 0
Part III. 1885 110 0
Part IV. 1885 0
Part V. 1887 0 8 0
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0
0
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0
Part II. 1887 1 8 0
Part III. 1888 0 16 0
Part I. 1888 0 12
Part 11. 1888 0 5
Part III. 1889 1 7
Part IV. 1890 0 12
Part V. 1890. .
. 0 6
Part VI. 1891 0 12
Part VII. 1891 0 6
Part V III. 1892 0 8
Part IX. 1892 0 12
Part X. 1893 1 8
Part XI. 1894 0 2
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0
Part II. 1894 1 11 0
Part III. 1894 0 10 0
Part IV. 1896 1 4 0
1 5
1 4
1 2
0 6 0
0 G
0 4
0 18 0
1 1 0
0 12 0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
9 0
0 9 0
1 10 0
13 3
0 7 G
0 18 0
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
SEP 9 i89t
[VOL. VI. PART 5.
THE
TRANSACTIONS
OF
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
A REVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA BELONGING
TO THE GENERA BRADYA, Boeck, AND ECTINOSOMA, Boeck.
BY
THOMAS SCOTT, F.L.S.,
MEMn, SOC. 7.001.. FRANCE, NATUIIALIST TO THE FISHERY BOARD FOR SCOTLAND,
AND
ANDREW SCOTT,
FISHERIES ASSISTANT, UNIVERSITY COLLEfiK, LIVEHPOOI,.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATBRNOSTER-ROW.
Jime 1896.
SEP ^' 189i
[ 419 ]
V, A Bevision of the British Copepoda heJoiiging to the Genera Bradya, Boeck, and
Ectinosoma, Boeck. By Thomas Scott, F.L.S., Hem. Soc. Zool. France, Naturalist
to the FisJiery Board for Scotland, ««(/ Andrew Scott, Fisheries Assistant, Unioersity
College, Licerpool.
(Plates 35-38.)
Bead 19tli November, 1894.
Introductory.
IN the course of our study of tlie British Entomostraca during- tlie past few years, we
have observed fi'om time to time specim.ens of Copepoda belonging apparently to one or
other of the genera Bradya and Ectinosoma, wliicli, so far as known to us, could not
be identified Avith any of the described species of eitlier of these two genera. Moreover,
as considerable dilBculty was sometimes experienced by iis in satisfactorily diagnosing
the characters by which these sjoccimens differed from, and by which they agreed with,
species already described, it was decided to delay beginning a critical study of the
several forms which had been observed until, if possible, a more extended inquiry had
been made. With this object in view, gatherings of tow-netted and dredged material
from various jilaces around our coasts have been examined as opportunities occurred, and
numerous specimens collected. Careful dissections have been made of all doubtful forms,
and, wherever necessary, accurate detailed drawings have been prepared. The results of
these researches we now propose to lay before the Linnean Society in the form of a
revision of the British Copepoda belonging to the genera Bradya and Ectinosoma,
with flgiu'es of all the species described.
We have described and figured the few species already described and figured in works
on British Copejjoda as well as those which, so far as we know, are new to science, in
order to bring into prominence certain obscure jioints not fully illustrated in previous
works, as well as to allow of the various species, old and new, being compared with
each otlier, with greater certainty and ease.
Though this revision has been the result of much careful research, it cannot be
considered exhaustive; but if it tends to simplify the study of these two somewhat
troublesome genera we shall feel amply rewarded for our labours.
We projiose to take the genus Bradya first, as the structure of the anterior foot-jaws
in this genus shows, in our opinion, a closer affiuity with the Calanidce than does that
of theu' homoloo-ues in Ectinosoma.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 56
420 MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT— EEVISION OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
The following is a list of the species described in this memoir, arranged in alphabetical
order : —
Genus Bradya.
Bradya elegans, sp. n., p. 422.
„ fusca, sp. n., p. 424.
„ hirsuta, sp. n., p. 423.
„ minor, sp. n., p. 425.
„ similis, sp. n., p. 424.
„ typica, Boeck, p. 421.
Genus Ectinosoma.
Ectinosoma armiferurn, sp. n., p. 434.
„ atlanticum, Brady & Robertson,
p. 437.
Ectinosoma curticorne, Boeck, p. 430.
„ trythropn, Brady, p. 431.
„ gracile, sp. n., p. 429.
Herdmani, sp. n., p. 432.
longicorne, sp. n., p. 439.
„ melaniceps, Boeck, p. 434.
„ Normani, sp. n., p. 435.
„ propinquum, sp. n., p. 428.
pygmceum, sp. n., p. 433.
Sarsi, Boeck, p. 427.
tenuipes, sp. n., p. 436.
tenuireme, sp. n., p. 439.
3)
Genus Bradya, Boeck (1872).
Description. Body elongate, fusiform ; abdomen not distinctly separated from the
thorax. The antennules are usually short and composed of live to eight joints.
The antennae are 3-jointed, and the secondary branches of the antennae are 2- to
3-jointed, usually slender, and of variable lengths.
The mandibles are each furnished with a well-developed palp, composed usually of a
stout basal joint bearing two 1-jointed branches, one of which is apical and the other
marginal.
The maxilla? are well developed.
The anterior foot-jaws are of considerable size and composed of five joints ; the first
tw^o joints are large and the articulation between them is strongly hinged ; the first joint
also bears three setiferous marginal processes ; the three terminal joints are usually very
small.
The posterior foot-jaws are smaller than the anterior and are 3-jointed; the end-
joint is shorter than the preceding one, and is usually provided with three apical setae.
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are all somewhat similar in structure; both
branches are composed of three subequal joints, and the outer are usually somewhat
shorter than the inner branches.
Fifth pair small, composed of two joints, a basal and a secondary joint.
Hemm^ks. The most important diflFerence between Bradya and Ectinosoma is to be
found in the structure of the anterior foot-jaws. In Bradya the anterior foot-jaws are
composed of five distinct joints, the first two of which are usually large, while the other
three are very small ; the articulation between the first two joints is strongly hinged,
and in all the " spirit " specimens examined by us the large second joint (together with
the three small terminal joints) is bent at, or nearly at, a right angle to the first joint.
Moreover, the secondary branches of the antenna? vary in the number of joints from two
to three, whereas in all the specimens of Ectinosoma examined by us the secondary
BELONGING TO THE GENEKA BKADYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 421
branches were ahvays 3-jointecl. The labium iu Ijoth Bradya and Ectinosoma is
frequently in the form of a hook-like process.
Bradya typica, Boeck (1872). (PI. 35. figs. 1, 11, 11, 22, 26, 32, 39, 44 ; PL 36.
figs. 1 and 12.)
1872. Bradya typica, Boeck (2), p. 15.
1880. Bradya typica, Brady (3), vol. ii. p. 17, pi. xxxviii. figs. 1-10.
1893. Bradya tyjncUj I. C. Tliompsou (16), p. 22, pi. xix. figs. Sb-c.
Description. Length '8 mm. (-3^ of an inch). Body moderately robust, fusiform ;
forehead produced into a short, narrow, but distinct rostrum, which reaches to about the
second joint of the antennules. Antennules very short, stout, and 8-jointed ; the first
three joints are subequal and longer than the others, as in the annexed formula, which
shows the approximate j)roportional lengths of all the joints ; —
No. of the joints, counting from the head : 1 . 2 . P) . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8
Proportional lengths of the joints : 77t)2yy43
The secondary branches of the antenna? are rather longer and more slender than the
primary branches, and 3-jointed, the middle joint being very small (PI. 35. fig. 14).
The mandibles are stout and armed at the truncate apex with a number of slender
teeth ; mandibular palp well developed, having the basal joint robust and furnished with
several plumose sette at the apex in addition to the two setiferous secondary branches
(PL 35. fig. 22).
Anterior foot-jaws stout, the first two joints large and subequal, the last three very
small (PL 35. fig. 26).
The end-joints of the posterior foot-jaws are very small ; two elongate but unequal
seta? sjn'ing fi-om the inner distal angles of the first joints, while the second joints are
each provided with a row of small teeth that extend from the lower proximal angle
obliquely across tlie joint to the upper distal angle ; a plumose seta also springs from the
lower distal angle; the small terminal joint forms the base of a stout, elongate, and
slightly curved setose spine, and a spiniform plumose seta springs from the inner margin
of the same joint (PL 35. fig. 32).
First four pairs of swimming-feet moderately stout ; outer branches of the first pair
considerably shorter than the inner branches ; in the fourth jjair both branches are about
equal in length (PL 35, figs. 39 and 44).
The fifth pah" are small ; the short produced interior portion of the basal joint, which is
about as broad as long, bears two apical setae — the inner one very long, spiniform, and
slightly plumose, the other shorter and more slender; a moderately long and slender
seta springs from the slightly produced outer portion of tlie same joint ; secondary joint
small, subquadrangular, and furnished with three slender setie, the two inner ones being
very long, while the other is much shorter (PL 36. fig. 1).
Caudal stylets short, and about equal in length to the last abdominal segment (PL 36.
fig. 12).
56*
422 MESSES. T. A]\'D A. SCOTT — EEVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
KabHat. Off Port Cressa Bay, Scilly Islands ; and off Hartlepool {G. S. Brady). West
of May Island, Firth of Fortli. Port Erin, Isle of Man (7. C. T.).
Bemcu'ks. The Firth of Forth specimens differ in one or two minor points from
Dr. Brad3''s description and figures in his excellent Monograph of the British Copepoda,
i. e. the antennules in the Forth specimens are 8-jointed and the secondary branches
of the antennae are 3-jointed (in this latter particular they agree with Boeck's
description), but in all the more important characters they agree with the description
and figures contained in Dr. Brady's valuable Avork.
Bradya elbgans, sp. n. (PI. 35. figs, i, 10, 15, 25, 29, 36, 38, 46 ; PL 36. figs. 4 and 11.)
Description. Length 1-2 mm. (-/r of an inch). Body elongate, slender ; rostrum
prominent, seen from above broadly rounded.
Antennules very short, stout, 5-jointed, strongly setiform, the second and last joints
shorter than the others ; the approximate proportional lengths of the joints are shown by
the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5
Proportional lengths : 7 3 5 5 3
AntennsB stout ; secondary bi'anch shorter than the primary, 2-jointed, the first joint
very short, the second elongate and becoming gradually dilated towards the distal end,
provided with two elongate, somewhat unequal, and densely plumose apical setoe ; the
last joint of the primary branch bears a number of setae that are coarsely and somewhat
irregularly plumose (PI. 35. fig. 15).
Mandibles somewhat stylet-shaped ; both branches of the palp, which are subterminal
on the basal joint, are strongly setiferous (PL 35. fig. 25).
Anterior foot-jaws small; basal joint stout, the three setiferous marginal processes
nearly alike; second joint much narrower and somewhat dilated distally ; the last three
joints are very small (PL 35. fig. 29).
Posterior foot-jaws somewhat similar in structure to those of Ectmosoma Sarsi, Boeck,
but smaller (PL 35. fig. 36).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are proportionally more slender and elongate than
those of Brachja typica, Boeck (PL 35. figs. 38 and 46).
The fifth pair are moderately large and broadly subquadrangular ; the produced inner
portion of the basal joint is cylindrical and twice as long as broad, and armed at the
apex with a moderately long spiniform seta, and a stout spine about half the length of
the seta; the outer angle of the basal joint, which is not produced, is provided with a
single slender hair and a few small spines ; the inner margin is fringed with small setae,
and there is an oblique row of similar setae on the lateral aspect of the joint ; the
secondary joint is broad and nearly square in outline ; the truncate aj)ex, which does not
extend beyond the end of the produced inner portion of the basal joint, is irregularly
serrate and bears three elongate sjiiniform setae arranged widely apart ; the middle one is
considerably longer than the one on either side ; there is also a slender seta on the outer
angle, and an oblique row of minute spines near the inner margin (PL 36. fig. 4).
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BRADYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 423
Habitat. Lar<?o Bav. Pirth of Fortli.
BemarJcs. This is a slender and very graceful species ; the broadly subiiuadrate form of
the fifth pair of feet is very characteristic. The antennae and mandibles differ some-
what from those of the typical Bradya, but otherwise it appears to be a true member of
the genus.
Bradya hirsuta. sp. n. (PL 35. figs. 2, S, 17, 10, 23, 28, 34, 40, 47; PL 36.
figs. 2-7.)
Description. Length 1 mm. (^5- of an inch). Body seen from the side fusiform ;
abdominal segments more or less hirsute ; rostrum prominent.
Antennules short, 5-jointed, the first two joints robust, the others smaller; the pro-
portional lengths of tlie joints are nearly as sliown by the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5
Proportional lengths : 7 8 3 4 4
Antennoe considerably more elongate than the antennvdes, the last joint armed with a
number of spiniform setse, the distal half of each of which is strongly ciliate along one
side; secondary branches 2-jointed, slender, the first joint short, the second elongate
and bearing two terminal setae.
The labium consists of a small hook-like process (PL 35. fig. 19).
Mandibles comparatively small and narrow, and armed with a few slender teeth ;
mandibular ]7alp larger, the basal joint furnished with a single short subapical plumose
•seta in addition to the secondary branches (PL 35. fig. 23).
Anterior foot-jaws small ; the first joint is very dilated, the second much narrower,
while the thi'ee terminal joints are very small (PL 35. fig. 28).
The first joint of the posterior foot-jaws bears a long setiferous spine on the upper
distal angle, one of the margins of which is fringed with cilia; the last joint, which is
very short, bears two moderately stout spiniform seta3 and a long intermediate hair
(PL 35. fig. 34).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet have the marginal spines and terminal spiniform
seta strongly plumose on the exterior edges (PL 35. figs. 40 and 47).
The fifth pair are strongly setiferous ; the produced inner portion of the basal joint
bears one long and one short spiniform seta ; the secondaiy joint extends beyond the end
of the produced inner portion of the basal joint, and is armed with three terminal spines ;
the two outer ones are elongate and slender, while the inner one is strong and robust, and
only about half the length of the one next to it ; a plumose seta springs from the lateral
aspect of the basal joint, near the exterior edge, and both joints bear transverse rows of
cilia, as well as being otherwise hirsute, as shown by the figure (PL 36. fig. 2).
Caudal stylets stout, elongate, and considerably divergent, their margins ciliate on the
.distal half (PL 36. fig. 7j.
Habitat. Largo Bay, Firth of Forth (1891).
Remarks. This species is at once distinguished by its comparatively large size and long
divergent caudal stylets, as well as by its hirsute abdomen and fifth pair of thoracic feet.
424 MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT — EEYISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
Bradta similis, sp. n. (PI. 35. figs. 3, 7, 16, 27, 33, 41, 48 ; PI. 36. figs. 3 and 10.)
Description. Length "69 mm. (a\- of an inch). Body seen from the side slender, fusi-
form ; rostrum of moderate length and slightly curved.
Antennules short, robust, 5-jointed; the first four joints about equal in length, but
the terminal joint rather shorter than the others. The proportional lengths of the joints
are nearly as shown by the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5
Proportional lengths : 8 8 8 8 5 '
Antennae longer than the antennules ; the first joint is about one and a half times the
length of the next and bears a small 2-jointed secondary branch at the distal end ; the
second and third joints are aboiit equal in length (PI. 35. fig. 16).
Mandibles nearly as in Bradya hirsufa.
Anterior foot-jaws much smaller than those of Bradya hlrsuta, and with three small
marginal pi'ocesses on the first joint (PI. 35. fig. 27).
Posterior foot-jaws also smaller and j)rovided with simple setiB (PL 35. fig. 33).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are all somewhat similar, except that the first
pair are rather more slender than the others ; the marginal spines of all the four pairs
are elongate and slightly setose on both edges ; the seta on the exterior angle of the
second basal joint of the fii'st pair is elongate and slender, while the seta similarly
situated on the fourth pair is considerably shorter (PI. 35. figs. 41 and 48).
In the fifth pair the exterior and interior produced 2)ortions of the basal joint are
somewhat similar, except that the inner is rather longer than the outer process and is
armed with a long stout spine, setose on botli margins, and a stout seta, while the outer
process bears a single moderately long seta ; the basal joint is furnished with one short
and one moderately long setose spine and a few small setcC on the lateral aspect, as
shown in the figure (PL 36. fig. 3) ; the secondary joint reaches beyond the end of the
basal joint and terminates in three more or less distinct lobes ; the two inner ones, which
are subequal, extend considerably beyond the outer ; the inner and outer lobes are each
armed with a very stout and moderately long spine, while the spine that springs from
the middle lobe is slender and much more elongate than the lateral spines ; all the three
spines have setose margins.
Caudal stylets comparatively elongate, being about equal to the combined lengths of
the last two segments of the al)domen ; they are also somewhat divergent, as shown in
the figure (PL 36. fig. 10).
Habitat. Largo Bay, Pirth of Forth.
MemarJis. This species resembles the one last described, but is much smaller. The
small secondary branches of the antennce and the structure of the fifth pair of thoracic
feet seem to be the chief distinguishing characters.
Bead-ea fusca, sp. n. (PL 35. figs. 6, 12, 18, 20, 30, 37, 43, 45 ; PL 36. figs. 6 and 8.)
Description. Length "7 mm. (3-^ of an inch). Body not so slender as that oi Bradya
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BEADTA AND ECTINOSOMA. 425
shnUis, nor so stout as that of Bradya typica ; rostrum rather more prominent than in
these two species.
Antennules short, stout, 6-jointecl, the first five gradually decrease in length, while
the last is about equal in length to the third; the annexed formula shows approximately
the proportional lengths of the joints :■ —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5.6
Proportional lengths : 7 6 5 4 3 5
Secondary branches of antennte small, slender, 2-jointed, the first joint much
■shorter than the second ; a number of setse fringe the distal half of the u])per margin of
the first joint of the primary branches (PL 35. fig. IS).
Labium bluntly rounded (PL 35. fig. 20).
The anterior and 2)osterior foot-jaws are somewhat similar in structure to those of
Bradya elegaiis, but smaller (PL 35. figs. 30 and 37).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are somewhat similar to those of Bradya typical
Boeck, but slender (PL 35. figs. 43 and 15).
The inner produced part of the basal joint of the fifth pair is elongate, narrow, cylin-
drical, ciliate on the inner margin, and provided with two apical setre, one of which is
rather longer than the basal joint, while the other is scarcely half as long ; the outer
angle of the basal joint is considerably produced and bears a small slender terminal
seta ; a moderately stout plumose seta springs from the lateral aspect of the basal joint
and near the base of the secondary joint ; the secondary joint, which is al)Out one and
a half times longer than l)road, extends somewhat beyond the end of the produced
inner part of the basal joint, and has a somewhat irregularly trilol)ed apex ; the two
inner lobes are subequal and extend beyond the outer one ; the three lobes are each
provided with a plumose seta ; the inner seta is short and stout, the middle one long
and slender, and nearly twice the length of the outer. Both basal and secondary joints
are furnished with transverse rows of cilia on their lateral aspect, as shown by the
figure (PI. 36. fig. 6).
Caudal stylets about one and a half times the length of the last abdominal segment;
colour brown (PL 36. fig. 8).
EaUtat. Largo Bay, Pirth of Forth (1891).
Remarks. The structxire of the antennules and antennae and of the fifth pair of
thoracic feet are characters by which the species is readily distinguished ; no similar
structure has been observed in any of the other species examined by us.
Bradya minor, sp. n. (PL 35. figs. 5, 9, 13, 21, 24, 31, 35, 42 ; PL 36. figs. 5 and 9.)
Description. Length '54 mm. (^e of an mch). Body moderately stout ; the abdomen
is more distinctly separated from the thorax in this species than in any of the others
described in this memoir ; rostrum somewhat slender and prominent.
Antennules short, stout, and 6-jointed ; a dusky-coloured pigment-spot occurs on
the first joint, as shown in the figure (PL 35. fig. 9), but Avhether it functions as an eye
426 MESSES. T. A>'D A. SCOTT— EEVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
we caunot say. The formula shows approximately the proportional lengths of the
ioints : —
No. of the joints : 1 . 2 . 3 ■ 4 . .5 . 6 _
Proportional lengths : 14 9 12 5 7 9
The secondary branches of the antennae are very slender and 3-jointed, and shorter
than the primary branches ; first two joints, hut especially the second, very short (PL 35,
fig. 13).
Mandibles well developed, the biting part broadly truxicate and armed with several
blunt-iiointed teeth ; the branches of the palp are fiu-nished with plain seta? (PL 35.
fig. 2i).
Anterior foot-javrs stout, the first joint furnished with two marginal seliferous
processes in addition to several setae (PL 35. fig. 31).
Posterior foot-jaws small ; the first joint bears on its distal end two long and stout
setae, which are plumose only on one side, and tlie second has its inner margin fringed
with cilia (PL 35. fig. 31).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are somewliat similar in structure to those of
BradyafHsca.
The fifth pair somewhat resemble those of Bradya fusca, but the inner portion of the
basal joint is not so much produced and does not reach the middle of the secondary
joint; the two terminal spines of the produced inner part of the basal joint are very
unequal in length, and there are a few small teeth round the inner margin and end of
this part of the joint ; the exterior angle of the same joint is also produced into a long
conical lobe that extends well down the side of the secondary joint, and terminates in a
slender hair ; the secondary joint is broadly oblong, and ends in a trilobed extremity
which reaches considerably beyond the basal joint ; the middle lobe is larger and more
produced than the lateral ones, which are subequal ; each lol^e forms the base of an
elongate and spiniform plumose seta ; the middle seta is rather longer and stouter than
the other two ; a slender seta springs from near the base of the same joint, and there are
transverse rows of niinvite seta? on the lateral aspect of the basal joint, as shown m the
figure (PL 36. fig. 5).
Caudal stylets short, about equal in length to the last al)dominal segment (PL 36.
fig. 9). Colour brownish.
Habitat. Pirth of Forth, off St. Monans; rock-pools on the shore of Hilbre Island,
Liverpool Bay.
Bemurks. The eye-like dusky pigment-si^ot at the base of the antennides, together
with the structure of the autennai and mouth-organs, are characters which readily
distinguish this from other British species of Bradya.
Genus Ectinosoma, Boeck (1864).
Descrijjtioit. Body elongate, fusiform, similar to that of Bradya.
Antennules 5- to 7-jointed, not longer than the first thoracic segment, and usually
tapering more or less towards the distal end.
BELONGING TO THE GEXEEA BKADYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 427
Aiiteuute similar to those of Bradya.
Mandibles usually cleft at the apex and armed with strong teeth ; mandibular palp
similar to that of Bradya.
Anterior foot-jaws usually composed of two robust joints, and armed at the extremity
with two moderately stout and elongate spiniform claws and a few setae ; the first joint
is also furnished Avith two or three setiferous marginal processes. Second joint usually
larger than the other.
Posterior foot-jaAvs elongate, slender, three-jointed, and in structure resembling those
of Bradya.
Five pairs of thoracic feet similar to those of Bi^adya.
Remarks. As already pointed out in. the description of the genus Bradya (ante, p. 420),
the difference in the structure of the anterior foot-jaws is the most important and the
most constant difference between Ectiuosoma and Bradya, and so great is the resemblance
otherwise between species belonging to these two genera that frequently we have found
it almost imj)ossible to distinguish without careful dissection whether the specimen that
haj)peued to be under examination belonged to the genus Ectinosoma or to Bradya.
EcTiNosoMA Saesi, Bocck (1872). (PL 36. figs. 14, 2G, 42 ; PI. 37. figs. 1, 21, 38, 52 ;
PI. 38. tigs. 10, 22, 32, 51.)
1872. Ectinosoma Sarsi, Boeck (2), p. -io.
1880. Ect'iHosuma spinipes, Brady (3). vol. ii. p. 9, pi. xxxvi. figs. 1-10.
1885. Ectinosoma Sarsi, Poppe (9), p. 198.
1888. Ectinosoma spinipes, Scott (12), p. 239.
1892. Ectinosoma Sarsi, Cami (6), p. 152.
1893. Ectinosoma spinipes, I. C. Thompson (16), p. 18, pi. xviii. fig. 8.
Description. Length 1"2 mm. (^/j- of an inch). Body, seen from the side, slender
fusiform ; rostrum prominent, blunt-pointed, and reaching to near the extremity of the
antennules.
Autennules short, robust, 5-jointed, gradually tapering towards the distal end, and
strongly setiferous. The proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the
formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5
Proportional lengths : lo 12 9 (riO '
Antennse large, 3-jointed, joints subequal in length, the terminal joint furnished
with a number of stout sette, coarsely plumose on the upper margin, and with several
short spines ; secondary branch elongate, 3-jointed, arising from the end of the
first joint of the primary branch; the last joint of the secondary branch is equal to
nearly twice the combined lengths of the other two joints; the first two joints are each
armed with a spiniform seta, that of the first joiat is short, but that of the second is
elongate and coarsely plimiose on the upper edge ; the last joint bears two long terminal
setre, also plumose on the upper edge (PI. 37. fig. 1).
Mandibles armed Avith a fcAV strong irregular-sized teeth and a small plumose seta ;
the basal joint of the palp, Avhich is nearly equal in size to the mandibles, bears
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 57
428 MESSES. T. AJyD A. SCOTT— EEVISION OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
a few terminal setoe in addition to the apical and marginal 1-jointed branches ; the
marginal branch is nineh smaller than the other (PL 37. fig. 21).
Anterior foot-jaws composed of two large, strongly dilated joints ; the first joint bears
tnree marginal processes on the distal half ; the middle process is much smaller than the
other two ; the end joint bears two vinequal and moderately short setose spines on the
inner edge and two elongate subequal spiniform claws and a few setse at the extremity
(PI. 37. fig. 38).
Posterior foot-jaws elongate, moderately stout, tapering towards the distal end ; a long
plumose seta springs from near the end of the first joint ; the second joint is strongly
ciliate on the upper margin, while the last joint bears two subterminal plumose spines
and one long and one short terminal seta, as shown in the figure (PL 37. fig. 52).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are robust ; the interior marginal setse on both
branches are stout and strongly plumose, while the exterior margins are fringed with
small sj)ines ; the outer marginal spines of the outer branches and the spiniform terminal
setse of both outer and inner branches are stout, and strongly setose on the exterior
edges ; a stout spine springs from the interior distal angle of the second basal joint of the
first pair (PL 38. figs. 10 & 22).
The fifth pair are sub quadrangular in outline ; the produced inner portion of the basal
joint is cylindrical and twice as long as broad ; its extremity is somewhat bilobed, and
reaches to near the end of the secondary joint ; the inner mai'gin bears several small setse ;
each of the terminal lobes forms the base of a spine, the inner one of which is stouter and
more elongate than the other ; the secondary joints are subquadrate, but rather longer
than broad, and terminate in three unequal lobes, each of which is the base of a
moderately stout spine, and is fu.rnished Avitli three apical spine-like teeth ; the middle
one of the three spines is longer than the one on either side ; there are a few spine-like
teeth on the lateral aspect of the basal joint, as shown in the figure (PL 38. fig. 32).
Caudal stylets short and moderately stout (PL 38. fig. 51).
Habitat. All roimd the British coasts ; moderately common.
Remarhs. This species is readily distinguished from the other Ectinosomata by the
form of the animal, and the structvire and armature of the swimming-feet.
EcTiNOSOMA PKOPiNQUUM, sp. n. (PL 36. figs. 19, 27, 46 ; PL 37. figs. 2, 15, 32, 55 ;
PL 38. figs. 9, 23, 34, 54.)
Description. Length 1"1 mm. (2^ of an inch). Body seen from the side fusiform ;
rostrum prominent and projecting nearly straight forAvard, somewhat spoon-shaped, or
with the sides slightly decurved and the apex rotm^ded.
Antennules short, stout, strongly setiferous, and composed of five joints. The pro-
portional lengths of the joints are nearly as shown by the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5
Proportional lengths : 11 9 12 7 12
Antennte nearly as in Ectinosoma Sarsi (PL 37. fig. 2). Mandibles also somewhat
similar to those of that species (PL 37. fig, 15), but two of the terminal setae of the
apical branch of the palp are united for a short distance at the base.
BELONGING TO THE GENEEA BKADYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 429
The lahiuni consists of a bifid and strongly-hooked j)rocess, a lateral view of which is
shoAvn in the figure (PI. 36. fig. 27).
Both pairs of foot-jaws are somewhat similar to tliose of Ectiiiosoma Sarsi (PL 37.
figs. 32 and 55).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are also somewhat like those of that species ;
but in the first pair the inner branches are proportionately shorter, while lioth branches
in the fourth pair are of nearly equal length, and the second basal joint of the same pair
is furnished Avitii an elongate slender spine on the exterior angle (PL 38. figs. 9 and 23).
The produced inner portion of the fifth pair is cylindrical in form, the length of which
is equal to about one and one-third times the breadth; the secondary branches are
nearly quadrangular in outline — the length only slightly exceeding the breadth; tlie
armature of the fifth pair is somewhat similar to that of Ectinosoma Sarsl (PL 38.
fig. 34).
Caudal stylets short, but rather longer than broad and a1)out equal in length to the
last abdominal segment. The posterior margins of the abdominal segments are all
more or less fringed with cilia.
Habitat. Firth of Porth, off Musselburgh.
Memarks. This species comes near Ectinosoma Sarsi, Boeck, but difl'ers in the following
particulars : the proportionate lengths of the joints of the antennules are greater, the
mandible is furnished with more small teeth on its biting-edge than that of E. Sarsi,
the anterior foot-jaws are stouter, the armature of the swimming-feet is somewhat
weaker, and' the fifth feet are much shorter, being nearly as long as broad.
Ectinosoma gracile, sp. n. (PL 36. figs. 18 and 37; PL 37. figs. 13, 28, 45 ; PL 38.
figs. 3, 27, 30.)
Description. Length -7 mm. (^^ of an inch). Body seen from the side very slender,
nearly cylindrical. Rostrum prominent. Antennules (PL 36. fig. 37) elongate, slender,
composed of seven joints ; the penultimate joint is nearly equal to the combined lengths
of the two preceding joints, as shown by the annexed formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5. 6 .7
Proportional lengths : S 8 5 8 4 11 4
Antennae elongate, moderately stout ; the secondary branches small and 3-jointed, not
reaching to the end of the second joint of the primary branches ; the first two joints are
short, the other elongate, being nearly twice the entire length of the first two (PL 37.
fig. 13).
Anterior foot-jaws elongate, moderately stout ; the end-joint about twice as long as
broad, and armed at tlie extremity with two long slender claws and two elongate slender
setee (PL 37. fig. 28).
Posterior foot-jaws slender, considerably shorter than the anterior foot-jaws ; end-joint
about half the length of the preceding one (PL 37. tig. 45).
Inner branches of the first four pairs of swimming-feet moderately slender and
57*
430 ]\1ESSRS. T. AXD A. SCOTT — EEVISIOX OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
elongate ; outer branches very slender and considerably shorter than the inner branches ;
the first joint is nearly equal in length to that of the next two together (PI. 38.
figs. 3 and 27).
Fifth pair small ; apical setfe slender, the middle seta of the secondary joint very long
and slender, being considerably longer than the outer elongate and slender seta of the
produced part of the basal joint ; a moderately long slender seta springs from near the
middle and on the lateral aspect of the secondary joint, — this joint extends very little
beyond the end of the produced part of the basal joint (PI. 38. fig. 30).
Habitat. Off St. INTonans, Firth of Forth ; vicinity of Port Erin, Isle of I^Ian.
Hemarks. The structure of the antennules, together with that of the antennte, the
mouth-organs, and fifth pair of thoracic feet, are characters by which Ectinosoma. g^xicile
may be distinguished from any other species described in this memoir.
Ectinosoma cubticorne, Boeck (1864). (PL 36. figs. 22, 30, 34; PI. 37. figs. 10, 24,
41, 48 ; PL 38. figs. 8, 20, 35, 44.)
1864. Ectinosoma curticorne, Boeck (i).
1885. Ectinosoma curticorne, Poppe (g), p. 194, Taf. 6. figs. 1-12.
1890 ? Bradya Edwardsi, Eichard (lo), p. 214, witli 10 figures in the text.
1893? Ectinosoma Edtvardsi, Schmeil (n), p. 92, Taf. viii. figs. 1-21.
1893. Ectinosoma ctirHcorne, I. C. Thompson (i6), p. 192, pi. xviii. fig. 8e.
Description. Length '7 mm. (-^g of an inch). Somewhat like Ectinosoma Sarsi in
general appearance ; rostriun short and stout.
Antennules very short and robust, 6-jointed; a somewhat roundish and dark-coloured
blotch occurs on tlie second joint of the antennules, as shown in the figure (PL 36.
fig. 34). The proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as shown in the formula: —
No. of the joints : 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . .5 . 6 _
Proportional lengths : 9 2 5 3 4 5
AntennfB nearly as in Ectinosoma Sarsi, but the secondary branches are shorter than
the primary ones (PL 37. fig. 10). The biting part of the mandibles is broad and armed
interiorly with several small teeth, but the outer teeth are large ; the branches of the
mandibular palp are not so wide apart as in Ectinosoma Sarsi (PL 37. fig. 24).
Anterior foot-jaws somewhat like those of Ectinosoma Sarsi, but very much smaller
(PL 37. fig. 41).
Posterior foot-jaws short, moderately stout ; two plumose setse springing from the end
of the basal joint, while the terminal joint, which is very small, bears two lateral
plumose and spine-like sette and a plain and slender terminal hair (PL 37. fig. 48).
The first foiu' pairs of swimming-feet are somewhat like those of Ectinosoma Sarsi, but
smaller ; the outer and inner branches of the foiu-th pair are also of nearly equal length,
and the lower marginal seta of the third pair is considerably longer than the others
(PL 38. figs. 8 and 20). The inner produced portion of the fifth pair extends to about
the middle of the secondary joint ; the terminal spines of both basal and secondary
joints are long and moderately stovxt, and l)oth joints (but especially the basal joint)
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BRADTA AND ECTINOSOMA. 431
are fvimished Avitli many small seta^ arranged in straight or curved rows, as shown
in the figure (PI. 38. fig. 35). Caudal stylets short, apparently 2-jointed, and equal
in length to the last abdominal segment (PI. 38. fig. 44). Colour chocolate-brown.
Habitat. Firth of Forth, off Burntisland ; Cromarty Firth, near the mouth of the
River Alness; iu the stomachs of young dabs from Blackpool, Lancashire; head of West
Loch Tarbert, Argyleshire.
jRemarks. This species resembles Bradya minor in having an eye-like pigment-spot at
the base of each antennule, and may therefore be mistaken for it unless some care is
taken and dissections made. It is, however, quite distinct from that species, as a com-
parison of the parts will show. Ectinosoma curticorne appears to form a source of food
for the young dabs {Pleuronectes Umaiula) on the Blackpool closed fishing-grounds : as
many as sixteen sj)ecimens were counted in one stomach.
The difference between Bradya Edicardsi, Eichard, and Ectiiiosoma curticorne, Boeck,
is, so far as we can make out, scarcely sufficient to warrant us in separating them.
EcTiNOSOMA ERYTHROPS, Brady (1880). (PI. 36. figs. 24, 31, 30 ; PL 37. figs. 14,
18, 37, 42; PL 38. figs. 13, 15, 39, 48.)
1880. Ectlnosoma erijthrops, Brady (3), vol. ii. p. 12, pi. xx.Kvi. figs. 11-17'.
1890. Ectinosoma erythrops, Scott (13), p. 318.
1893. Ectinosoma erythrops, I. C. Thompson (16), p. 192, pi. xviii. fig. 8 c, d).
Description. Length -73 mm. (-^^ of an inch). Body slender fusiform; rostrum
moderately prominent, incurved (PL 36. fig. 24). Antennules short, setiferous, gradually
tapering to the slender extremity, 5- (?or 6-) jointed; the last joint is long and narrow
and appears to be composed of two coalesced joints ; the proportional lengths of the joints
are nearly as shown in the formula : —
No. of the joiuts : 1.2.3.4. 5
Proportional lengths : 11 6 11 5 (7 7) '
Antenmx; elongate, the last joint sparingly setiferous ; the secondary branch, which does
not extend much beyond the end of the second joint of the primary branch, has the first
two joints very small, while the last is long and slender (PL 37. fig. 14).
Mandibles rather smaller, and with the palp more elongate than the same appendages
in Ectinosoma Sarsi (PL 37. fig. 18).
Anterior foot-jaws are also somewhat similar to those of that species, but the last joint
is more elongate, and the terminal claws arc also proportionally longer (PL 37. fig, 37).
Posterior foot-jaws small and slender (PL 37. fig. 42).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are considerably longer than those of Ectinosoma
Sarsi ; the inner marginal setae on both branches are plain and more slender than those
of that species, and the terminal spines are also more elongate ; the second joint of the
inner branches has the outer distal angle produced into a long spine-like process, that
extends downward in front of the upper half of the thii'd joint (PL 38. figs. 13 and 15).
The inner portion of the basal joint of the fifth pair is not much produced ; the
432 MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT — REVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
secondary joint is broadly subcylindrical, with the extremity irregularly trilobed and
armed with three long spines, the middle one of which is considerably longer than the
other two ; two small settu .also spring from near the base of the joint ; the inner
produced part of the basal joint is furnished with two spines, the inner one being very
long and powerful, the other smaller; all the large spines are plumose (PI. 38. fig. 39).
Caudal stylets short, but rather longer than the last abdominal segment (PL 38. fig. 48).
Sabitat. Pirth of Porth, off St. Monans.
Remarks. As all the specimens of this Copepod had been in spirit for some time before
being identified, we were unable to see the red pigment-sj)ot to which the species owes
its name. The form of the animal, together with the divergent setse of the fifth feet,
serves to distinguish it when mixed up with any of the other members of the genus.
EcTiNOSOMA Herdmani *, sp. u. (PI. 36. figs. 16, 44 ; PI. 37. figs. 8, 16, 29, 54 ;
PL 38. figs. 7, 25, 33, 47).
Description. Length "8 mm. (3^- of an inch). Body, seen from the side, fusiform
and somewhat similar to Ectinosoma Sarsi, but proportionally narrower ; rostrum
prominent. Antennules (PL 36. fig. 44) 6-jointed, moderately slender, the first joint
considerably longer than any of the others, as shown by the annexed formula: —
No. of the joints : 1.2.;^. 4. 5. 6
Proportional lengths : 13 7 9 6 4 4 '
Antenna? somewhat similar to those of Ectinosowa Sarsi, but smaller, and the first two
joints of the secondary branch are together nearly equal in length to the third joint
(PL 37. fig. 3).
Mandibles very small, but with a proportionally larger palp than in those of Ectino-
soma Sarsi (PL 37. fig. 16). Anterior foot-jaws robust, somewhat similar in form to
those of Ectinosoma Sarsi ; the first joint bears only two small marginal processes at the
distal end, and the terminal claw-like spines are very long and slender (PL 37- fig. 29).
Posterior foot-jaws elongate and slender ; the middle joint is about four times the length
of the end one, and is fringed with twelve or fourteen moderately stout hairs (PL 37.
fig. 64).
The first foiu* pairs of swimming-feet somewhat like those of Ectinosoma Sarsi, but
much smaller and with the marginal sette plain (PL 38. figs. 7 and 25).
Pifth pair also similar to those of that species, but the inner portion of the basal joint
is less produced ; the secondary joint is shorter, and the ajoical spines are longer and are
all of nearly equal length (PL 38. fig. 33).
Caudal stylets very short and about equal in length to the last abdominal segment
(PL 38. fig. 47).
HaMtat. Pirth of Forth, off St. Monans ; Port Erin, Isle of Man.
Hemarks. The elongate form of this species, together with the somewhat slender
* In compliment to Prof. W. A. Herdman, F.R.S.
BELONGING TO THE GENEEA BEADY A AND ECTINOSOMA. 433
antennules and broadly subquadraugidar form of the llftb. pair of thoracic feet, the apical
spines of which are all of nearly equal length, are characters by which it can be readily
distinguished.
EcTiNOSOMA PYGM^UM, sp. n. (PI. 36. figs. 15 and tl ; PL 37. figs. 5, 20, 39, 43 ;
PL 38. figs. 4, 26, 31, 55.)
DescrijjtioH. Length "33 mm. {-f-^ of an inch). Seen fiom the side the thoracic
portion of the body is moderately stout, with the dorsum considerably arched, but the
abdomen, Avhich is comparatively narrow, is only slightly tapering ; rostrum prominent
(PL 36, fig. 15).
Antennules 6-jointed, short, moderately stout, gradually tapering to the apex and
furnished with numerous hairs ; the proportional lengths of the joints are nearly as
sliOAvn in the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5.6
Proportional lengths : 6 ^34222 '
Antennic larger than the antennules ; the secondary branch is composed of three nearly
equal joints, but tlic middle one is slightly shorter than the one on either side (PL 37.
fig. 5). Mandibidar palp well developed; basal joint large, with two plumose apical setae ;
the subapical branch is much larger than the marginal one ; two elongate teeth spring
from a notch near the middle of the inner margin of tbe mandibles, and reach to the
trimcate and slightly-toothed apex (PL 37. fig. 20).
Anterior and posterior foot-jaws somewhat similar in structure to those of Ectinosoma
Sarsi, but very small (PL 37. figs. 39 and 13). The first four pairs of swimming-feet
are also somewhat similar to that species, but are more slender ; the marginal setoB are
plain, the first pair want the transverse rows of small spines possessed by those of
Uctinosoma Sarsi, and the outer branches of the fourth jmir are proportionally longer
(PL 38. figs. -1 and 26). The fifth pair are small and furnished with elongate fusiform
spines, which become extremely slender towards the extremity ; the secondary joint,
Avhich extends considerably beyond the inner produced portion of the basal joint, is
irregularly trilobed, and each lobe forms the base of a s})ine ; the two outer spines are of
nearly equal length, but the inner one is scarcely half the length of the one next to it ;
the outer portion of the basal joint is produced into an elongate and very narrow
appendage bearing a slender apical seta (PL 38. fig. 31).
Caiidal stylets very short, being scarcely equal in length to the last abdominal segment
(PL 38. fig. 55).
Habitat. Firth of Forth, and in the vicinity of Port Erin, Isle of Man.
Remarks. This is the smallest species of Ectinosoma known to us. The structure of
the secondary branches of the antennae and of the mandibles, together with the peculiar
fusiform sjnnes of the fifth pair of thoracic feet, appear to be sufiiciently characteristic
to distinguish it from any of the others described in this memoir.
434 MESSES, T. AND A. SCOTT— liEVlSlOJN' OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
EcTiNOSOMA MELANiCEPS, Boeck (1864). (PL 36. figs. 13, 28, 45 ; PI. 37. figs. 11, 22,
40, 49 ; PL 38. figs. 2, 21, 41, 4G.)
1864. Ectinosoma melaniceps, Boeck (i), p. 30.
1880. Ectinosoma melaniceps, Brady (3), vol. ii. p. 11, pL xl. figs. 17-20.
1890. Ectinosoma melaniceps, T. Scott (13), p. 318.
1893. Ectinosoma melaniceps, I. C. Tliompsou (16), p. 18, pi. xxi. fig. 2 a.
Description. Length -63 mm. [-}q of an inch). Eostrum elongate, slender, ciu'ved
downward.
Antennules short, 7-jointed, gradually tapering from the moderately stout base to
the slender apex ; the third joint is considerably longer than any of the other joints, as
exhibited by the formula, which shows the proportional lengths uearly of all the joints: —
No. of the ioints : 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . G . 7
Proportional lengths : 9 6114552
Antennae elongate ; basal joint stout and equal to about two-thirds the length of the
next one; the second and third joints are more slender than the basal joint, and the
last is somewhat shorter than the preceding one ; the secondary branch has the middle
joint very small, while the first and third are comparatively elongate (PL 37. fig. 11).
Moitth-organs nearly as in Ectinosoma Sarsi, but much smaller (PL 37. figs. 22, 40, 49).
The outer branches of the first pair of swimming-feet are equal to about three fourths
the lengtii of the inner branches ; the first and second joints only of the outer branches
are furnished witli elongate spines, and the interior marginal setae of both branches are
slender and not plumose ; in the fourth pair tlie outer and inner branches are about
equal in length (PL 38. figs. 2 and 21).
The produced inner portion of the basal joint of the fifth pair, which is cylindrical in
outline and reaches only a little beyond the middle of the secondary joints, is provided
with a moderately long apical seta and stout conical spine serrate on the edges, while
the secondary joint bears one slender and three spiniform apical setae, the second one
from inside being very long with a tenuated extremity (PL 38. fig. 41).
Caudal stylets very short (PL 38. fig. 46).
Habitat. Generally distributed, and usually among weeds, in the laminarian zone.
Memarks. This species is readily distinguished by its having a considerable portion of
the front part of the head of a dusky colour, as well as by the structure of the
antenniiles and fifth pair of feet.
Ectinosoma armiferom, sp. n. (PL 36. figs. 20 and 43; PL 37. figs. 4, 17, 31, 53;
PL 38. figs. 14, 19, 37, 43.)
Description. Length -97 mm. {-.h^ of an inch). Body stout; rostrum prominent
(PL 36. fig. 20).
Antennules 5= (?or 6-) jointed, very short and robust, strongly setiferous, especially
towards tlie distal end, where there are several strong and very elongate plumose setae
BELONGING TO THE GENEEA BEADYA AISJ) ECTINOSOMA. 435
(PI. 36. fig. 43). The ujoproximate proportional leng-tlis of tlic joints arc shown by the
formula : —
No. of the joints : 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . (? (i)
Proportional lengths : 15 y II b 3 (73)
Antennules stout, -well developed, armed with strong plumose sette ; secondary branches
3-jointed, shorter than the primary branches ; the middle joint is equal to about half
the length of the first and a third of the length of the last joint (PL 37. fig. 4).
Mandibles stout, furnished at the apex with tw^o strong teeth, — one bifid, the other
conical, — and a few small spines ; mandibular palp somewhat like that of Ectinosoma
elongatum, but more strongly setiferous (PL 37. fig. 17).
Anterior foot-jaws dilated, apparently 5-jointed ; the first joint is considerably larger
than all the others together, the terminal joints very small; two of the marginal
processes are each armed with a stout spine and a few seta?; the subapical claws are
strong and slightly curved, the terminal setoe few and comparatively short (PL 37.
fig. 31). In the structure of the anterior foot-jaw's this species connects Ectinosoma
with Bradya.
Posterior foot-jaws cylindrical and slightly distorted, much smaller than those of
Ectinosoma Sarsl ; the end-joint, which is equal to about one-third the length of the
middle joint, bears one stout and strongly plumose, and one long, slender, and plain
terminal seta ; a short seta also springs from near the proximal end of the upper margin
(PL 37. fig. 53). The outer branches of the first pair of swimming-feet are short, being
only about three-fifths of the length of the inner branches ; a long plumose seta sj^rings
from the oviter angle of the second basal joint, and a moderately stout spine from the
interior angle; the fourth pair are somewhat like the first, but the outer branches are
proportionally rather longer, and the seta on tlic outer angle of the second basal joint is
plain, and there is no spine on the inner angle (PL 38. figs. 14 and 19).
The fifth pair is small ; the secondary joint is subqnadrate and scarcely reaches beyond
the produced inner portion of the basal joint ; the middle apical seta of the secondary
joint, and the inner one on the truncate apex of the produced inner portion of the basal
joint, are stout, slightly curved, and of great length (PL 38. fig. 37).
Caudal stylets very short and somewhat wide apart ; abdomen clothed wdth transverse
rows of minute hairs (PL 38. fig. 43).
Habitat. Firth of Porth, west of May Island,
Hemarks. The species now described is readily distinguished from any of the others
recorded in this Report, by its robust form, by the structure and armature of the
antennules and antenna;, and especially by the form and by the peculiarly elongate
setffi of the fifth pair of thoracic feet.
Ectinosoma Normani*, sp. n. (PL 36. figs. 21, 29, 39; PL 37. figs. 12, 26, 34, 51 ;
PL 38. figs. 5, 18, 42, 45.)
Description. Length "55 mm. (^5- of an inch). The thorax seen from the side
is broadest at the posterior end of the first body-segment, and from thence the
* In compliment to the Rev. A. M. Norman, F.E.S., &c.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 58
436 JIESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT — REVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
dorsum tapers gradually to the extremity of the abdomen ; the anterior part of the
eephalothoracic segment curves gently and regularly to the apes of the comparatively
small rostrum. On the lower rounded angle of the eephalothoracic segment, and imme-
diately j)osterior to the base of the antennules, there is a small but distinct and bright-
red pigment-spot, as shown in the full-size di'awing of the animal (PI. 36. fig. 21).
Antennules small, moderately stout, 7-jointed ; the proportional lengths of the joints
are nearly as shown in the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5.6.7_
rroiiortional lengths : 7 7 7 4 3 3 3 ^
Secondary branches of the antennae 3-jointed, and reaching to near the middle of the
last joint of the primary branches ; the middle joint is very small, while the end-joint is
equal to about one and a half times the length of the first joint (PI. 37. fig. 12).
Mandibles armed at the apex with a stout irregularly trifid process and a strong
conical blunt-pointed tooth ; a small and moderately stout plumose marginal seta springs
from a little below the base of the conical tooth ; the basal joint of the mandibular palp
bears a single short subapical seta in addition to the two 1-jointed branches (PI. 37.
fig. 26). Anterior foot-jaws very small, but moderately stout; marginal processes small
and crowded near the end of the first joint; terminal claws slender, curved, their inner
margin ciliate on the distal half (PL 37. fig. 34).
Posterior foot-jaws very small, but similar in structure to those of Ectinosoma Sarsi
(PI. 37. fig. 51).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet are slender, the outer branches considerably
shorter than the inner ones ; marginal setae elongate, slender, and not plumose (PI. 38.
figs. 5 and 18). Eifth pair somewhat like those of Ectinosoma temilpes (to be described),
but the lobes of the secondary joints are separated from each other by a deep sinus ;
there is also a transverse row of cilia at the proximal end (PI. 38. fig. 42).
Caudal stylets nearly twice as long as broad (PI. 38. fig. 45). Ovisac large.
Habitat. Pirth of Porth, off Burntisland ; Barrow Channel, near Barrow-in-Furness.
Memarks. This is not the Ectinosoma erythrops of Dr. Brady's ' Monograph of the
British Copepoda,' though it agrees wdth the descrij^tion of that species in so far as it
possesses a red pigment-spot near the lower anterior angle of the eephalothoracic
segment. Ectinosoma Normani distinctly differs from that species, as well as from the
others described in these pages, by the structure of the mouth-organs and of the fifth
pair of thoracic feet. The red pigment-spot, though very conspicuous Avhen freshly
preserved, disappears after being in spirit for a few days.
Ectinosoma tenuipes, sp. n. (PI. 36. figs. 25, 32, 35 ; PL 37. figs. 9, 19, 30, 47 :
PL 38. figs. 12, 17, 36, 52.)
Description. Length -6 mm. (-/,- of an inch). Seen from the side the thoracic
dorsum is very gently curved and tapers gradually to the moderately stout abdomen ;
rostrum prominent (PL 36. fig. 25).
Antennules 7-jointed, rather longer and much less rolmst than those of Ectinosoma
BELONGING TO THE GEXERA BKAUYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 437
Sarsi, sjiaringly setiferous ; a long slender sensoiy filament springs from the third j oiut,
the ujiper distal angle of wliich is produced to form the base of the filament (PL 36.
fig. 35j. The annexed formula exhibits the proportional lengths of the joints very
nearly : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5.6.7
Proportional lengths : 8^"~9 5^8 4 4*
Antennas slender ; secondary branches S-jointed, very slender, scarcely longer than
the second joint of the jirimary branches ; the first joint is rather shorter than the last,
while the middle ono is small (PI. 37. fig. 9).
. Labium with a very slender " hook " (PI. 36. fig. 32).
Mandibles armed on one side of the apex with a broad tridentate process and on the
other side with a moderately stout spine, w^hile between these is a large conical tooth ;
the branches of the palp are slender (PI. 37. fig. 19). Anterior foot-jaws somewhat
like those of Ecti)iosoma Sarsi, but scarcely so stout (PL 37. tig. 30).
Posterior foot-jaws very slender, and the end-joint is nearly equal to half the length of
the one immediately jireceding (PL 37. fig. 47).
The first four pairs of swimming-feet have the inner branches moderately stout and
elongate, but the outer branches are considerably shorter than the inner one and very
slender (PL 38. figs. 12 and 17).
Pifth j)air small ; the produced inner portion, of the basal joint is furnished with a
short stout spine and a long spiniform seta ; the secondary joint is nearly as broad as
long and does not reach much beyond the jiroduced part of the basal joint ; its outer
margin is broadly rounded, but the inner margin is nearly straight ; the apex is broadly
truncate and indistinctly four-iobed — each lobe forming the base of a seta ; the outer
seta is stout and elongate, the next is short and very slender, the third seta is stout and
considerably longer than the outer one, while the inner seta is short and spiniform
(Pi. 38. fig. 3G).
Caudal stylets equal to about two-thirds the length of the last abdominal segment
(PL 38. fig. 52).
Habitat. Firth of Porth, off St. Monans.
Remarks. The slender posterior foot-jaws and outer branches of the first foiu* paii-s of
swimming-feet serve to distinguish Ectinosoma teiiuipes from the other species described
in this memoir.
EcTixcsoMA ATLANTICUM (Brady and Ptobertson). (PL 36. figs. 17 and 40; PL 37.
figs. 6, 23, 35, 50 ; PL 38. tigs. 11, IB, 38, 53.)
1873. Microsetdla atlantica, B. & E.. (5), p. 130, pi. ix. figs. 11-16.
1880. Ectinosoma atlanticum, Brady (3), voL ii. p. 13, pL xsxviii. figs. 11-19.
1883. Ectinosoma atlanticum, Brady (4), p. 100, pL iv. figs. 10-14.
1887. Ectinosoma atlanticum, Jules de Gueruc (8), p. 344.
1891. Microsetdla atlantica, Scott (14), p. 302.
1892. Microsetdla atlantica, Giesbrecht (7), p. 550, Taf. 44.
1893. Ectinosoma atlanticum, I. C. Thompsou (16), p. 192, pi. xix. fig. 1.
1894. Microsetdla atlantica, T. Scott (15), p. 91.
58*
438 MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT — BE VISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
Description. Length '55 mm. (^^5- of an inch). Body very slender; the forehead,
seen from the side, is small and sharply rounded to form the small beak-like rostrum
<P1. 36. fig. 17).
Antennules 6-jointed, elongate, slender, and sparingly setiferoiis ; the third joint is
considerably longer than any of the others, but the last joint is vex-y small, as showTi by
the formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3.4.5.6
Proportional lengths : 10 8 18 11 11 3"
Antennae slender ; secondary branches ;3-jointed, longer than the second joint of the
primary branches ; the first two joints are small, the other is elongate (PI. 37. fig. 6).
Basal jomt of the mandibular palj) comparatively small and furnished with a stout sub-
marginal plumose seta ; the superior apical branch is nearly as large as the joint to
which it is articulated, and is armed with a stout spiniform and semiplumose seta and
also with several plain setae ; the inferior marginal branch is extremely small (PL 37.
fig. 23). The anterior foot-jaws closely resemble those of Ectluosoma Sarsi, but are
much smaller (PI. 37. fig. 35). Posterior foot-jaws short, moderately stout, somewhat
cylindrical in form, and with the terminal joint very short (PI. 37. fig. 50).
First four pairs of swimming-feet slender. In the first pair the outer branches are
scarcely equal in length to the inner branches, but in the fourth pair both branches are
of about eqtxal length (PI. 38. figs. 11 and 16).
Fifth pair small ; the produced inner portion of the basal joint extends to about the
apex of the secondary joint ; two slender and very long plain sette spring from the apex
of the secondary joint, and one from the produced inner portion of the basal joint ; both
joints are also furnished with a small seta at the inner distal angle, in addition to a
transverse row of small spines, as shown in the figure ; a slender seta also springs from
the lateral aspect of the secondary joint (PL 38. fig. 38).
Caudal stylets short (PL 38. fig. 53).
Abdomen clothed with indistinct transverse rows of minute hairs ; the posterior
margins of the segments of the thorax and abdomen are also fringed as in most of the
other species described here.
Habitat. From various parts of the British coasts, both inshore and in the open sea,
and in dredged material, as well as in toAV-net gatherings — as, for examj)le, in the
Atlantic, off the west coast of Ireland and in Kinsale Harbour ; in various parts of Loch
Fyne ; in various parts of the Firth of Forth (we have taken Ectinosoma atlanticum
both with the dredge and with the tow-net in the Firth of Forth, and it was very
common in material collected in a large flannel sieve used for filtering the sea-water
that is pumjoed into the fishpond at the Dunbar hatchery).
'Remarks. After a careful study of numerous specimens of Ectlnosoma atlanticum,
we, like Dr. G. S. Brady *, can find no valid reason for separating this species from
Ectinosoma. It no doubt differs from the typical Ectinosoma in the greatly disjiropor-
tionate sizes of the branches of the mandibular palp and in the structure of the posterior
* ' Monograph of the British Copepoda,' vol. ii. p. 14 (ISSO).
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BEADYA AND ECTINOSOMA. 439
foot-jaws; it also wants the prominent rostrum of the typical Ect'mosoma; but these
differences are so small as, in our opinion, to be of no more than specific value. The
elongate antennules of this species cannot be considered to l)e of any more than specific
importance, as those of some of the other species now described are also of considerable
length.
EcTiNOSOMA LONGICORNE, sp. n. (PL 36. figs. 23 and 38; PL 37. figs. 7, 25, 33, M;
PL 38. figs. G, 28, 29, 50.)
Description. Length '6 mm. (-^-^ of an inch). Body moderately robust ; seen from
the side, the dorsum tapers gradually from the fii-st cephalothoracic segment to the
extremity of the abdomen, while the anterior end is boldly rounded to where it merges
in the somewhat prominent rostrum (PL 36. fig. 23).
Antennules (PL 36. fig. 381 elongate, slender, and G-jointed ; the first joint is consi-
derably longer than any of the others, as shown by the annexed formula : —
No. of the joints : 1.2.3 .4.5.6 _
Proportional lengths : 18 "8 'll 5 5 9 '
econdary liranches of the antennae very slender, 3-jointed, rather longer than the
second joint of the primary branches ; the first and third joints are subequal in length,
but the second is very small (PL 37. fig. 7).
Mandibles armed with a few large apical teeth and a short marginal spine ; the basal
joint of the palp is provided with a few terminal setse, and both of the one-jointed
branches are comparatively Avell developed, but the apical is about twice the length
of the marginal branch (PL 37. fig. 25). Anterior foot-jaws stout, somewhat similar
to those of Ectinosoma Sarsi, but the seta3 of the marginal processes on the first joint
Are not plumose (PL 37. fig. 33).
The posterior foot-jaws also resemble those of Ectinosoma Sarsi, but are more slender
(PL 37. fig. 41).
First four pairs of swimming-feet slender and furnished -with plain marginal setse
.(PL 38. figs. G and 28).
The fifth pau" are small, and somewhat resemble those of Ectinosoma pi/gmcetim ; but
the apical setae are not fusiform, and the middle seta of the secondary joint is consider-
ably longer than the one on either side (PL 38. fig. 29). Caudal stylets short, being
about equal in length to the last abdominal segment (PL 38. fig. 50).
Habitat. Pirth of Forth, off St. Monans.
liemarJis. The elongate antennules, the slender 3-jointed secondary branches of
the antennae, and the slender foot-jaws readily rlistinguish this from other species of
Ectinosoma. We do not know of its occurrence beyond the Forth area.
Ectinosoma tenuireme, sp. n. (PL 36. fig. 33 ; PL 37. figs. 8, 27, 3G, 46 ; PL 38.
figs. 1, 24, 40, 49.)
Lescription. Eesembling Ectinosoma gracile in general appearance.
Antennules 7-jointed, and somewhat like those of Ectinosoma gracile, but more
elongate, and the penultimate joint is nearly equal in length to the first, and aboUt
44-0 MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT— REVISION OF THE BRITISH COPEPODA
twice the length of the preceding joint (PI. 36. fig. 33). The formula shows approximately
the proportional lengths of all the joints : —
No. of the joint.s : 1.2.3.4.5.6.7
Proportional lengths : 17 10 13 10 8 15 5
Secondary hranches of the antennae 3-jointed and very slender, rather longer than
the second joint of the primary hranches ; the middle joint very small, but the
terminal joint is equal to about twice the length of the first (PL 37. fig. 8). Anterior
foot-jaws large and moderately stout ; terminal joint elongate-ovate, fully twice as long
as broad; terminal claws very long, the distal half fringed with cilia on the inner aspect;
terminal seta3 two, shorter than the claws and very slender (PI. 37. fig. 36). Posterior
foot-jaw^s elongated and very tenuated, the terminal joint nearly equal to half the length
of preceding one, while the middle ajoical seta is about tw'o and a half times the length
of the joint from which it springs (PI. 37. fig. 46). The inner branches of the first
pair of swimming-feet elongate, slender ; the outer branches, which are composed of
three nearly equal joints, are also slender, but scarcely reach to the end of the second
joint of the inner branches ; the fourth pair are stouter than the first, and the outer
branches extend somewhat beyond the end of the second joint of the inner branches
(PI. 38. figs. 1 and 24).
In the fifth pair the middle seta of the secondary joint is extremely long and slender,
being nearly three times the length of those on either side ; the inner seta of the pro-
duced inner portion of the basal joint is nearly equal in length to the shorter setse of the
secondary joint ; the outer seta is slender and shorter than the inner ; the two outer
setse of the secondary joint and the longest seta of the produced inner part of the basal
joint are somewhat dilated or fusiform at the proximal end, — the longer of the two setae
on the produced part of the basal joint especially being very distinctly swollen near the
base ; a slender seta springs from near the middle of the hollow at the base of the
secondary joint, as shown in the figure (Pi. 38. fig. 40).
Sabitat. Tirth of Porth, off St. MonanS.
Memarks. This species, which somewhat resembles Ectinosoma gracile in general
appearance, differs quite distinctly from it by most of the characters described above,
but especially by the structure of the antennae, the very elongate and slender posterior
foot-jaws, and by the structure of the first and fifth pairs of thoracic feet.
A List of some of the Works eeferred to in 9?his Memoir.
1. BoECK, A. — Oversigt over de ved Norges Kyster iagttauge Copepoder (Soerskilt aftrykt af
Videusk.-Selskab. Forhandl. Christiauia), 1864.
2. BoECK, A. — Nye Slsegter og Arter af Saltvauds-Copepoder (ibidem), 1872.
3. Brady, G. S. — A Monograph of the British Copepoda, 1878-80.
4. Brady, G. S. — Report ou the Copepoda collected by H.M.S. ' Challenger/ 1883.
5. Brady and Robertson. — Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. xii. 1873.
6. Canu, Eugene. — Les Copepodes du Boulonnais, 1892.
7. Giesbrecht, W. — Pelagischen Copepoden des Golfes von Neapel, 1892.
BELO^'GI^"G TO THE GENERA BRADTA AND ECTINOSOMA.
441
,8. GuERNE, J. DE. — Sur les Genres Ectinosoma, Boeek, et Podon, Lilljcborg (Bull. Soc. Zool. France,
tome xii.), ]887.
9. PoppE, S. A. — Die freilebeiKlcn Copepodeu de Jahdebusens, i. (Abliandl. nat. Ver. Bremen), 1885.
10. E.ICHARD, Jules. — Description du Bradya edvardsi, Copepode aveugle nouveau (Mem. de la Soc.
Zool. de France, tome iii.), 1890.
11. ScHMEiL, Otto. — Deutschlands frcilebcnde Siisswasser-Copepoden. II. Teil : Harpacticidte (Biblio-
tlieca Zoologica, Heft xv.), 1893.
12. Scott, T. — A Revised List of the Crustacea of the Firth of Forth (Sixth Annual Report of the
Fishery Board for Scotland), 1888.
13. Scott, T. — Additions to the Fauna of the Firth of Forth (Eighth Annual Report of the Fishery
Board for Scotland), 1890.
14. Scott, T. — Additions to the Fauna of the Firth of Forth : Part III. (Ninth Annual Report of the
Fishery Board for Scotland), 1891.
15. Scott, T. — Entomostraca from the Gulf of Guinea (Trans, of the Linn. Soc, series 2, Zool.
vol. vi.), 1894.
16. Thompson, I. C. — Revised Report on the Copepoda of Liverpool Bay (Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc),
1893.
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Plate 35.
Female seen from left side.
One of the antennules (female).
One of the antennre.
Labium.
Mandible and palp.
X 53.
X 53.
X 53.
X 53.
X 80.
X 80.
x380.
X380.
X 380.
X253.
x253.
X 380.
X 333.
x253.
X253.
x253.
x253.
x253.
x304.
x304.
X500.
x253.
X 253.
x304.
X 253.
442
MESSES. T. AND A. SCOTT — EEVISION OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
One of the anterior foot-jaws.
One of the posterior foot-jaws.
Foot of first pair of swimming-feet.
Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
»
X 304.
X 500.
x380.
x380.
x380.
x500.
x500.
x500.
X380.
xoOO.
x380.
X380.
Xl26.
xl26.
xl26.
xl90.
xl26.
xl26.
X126.
xl26.
Xl26.
Xl26.
xl90.
Fi£
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BEADYA AND ECTINOSOMA.
443
Female seen from left side.
Labium.
One of the antennules (female).
X 40.
X 80.
X 53.
X 64.
X 53.
X 64.
xl90.
x253.
x253.
X380.
x253.
x253.
x304.
x253.
X 253.
x218.
x218.
xl70.
X 253.
x218.
X 253.
x500.
x253.
x218.
x253.
x253.
xl90.
Plate 37.
Fig.l
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
n.
12.
13.
14.
SECOND SERIES.
Ectinosoma Sarsi, Boeck.
„ propinquum, n. sp.
,, Herdmani, n. sp.
„ armiferum, n. sp.
j> pygnueum, n. sp.
„ atlanticum (B. & R.).
,, longicorne, n. sp.
J, tenuireme, n. sp.
„ tenuipes, n. sp.
„ curticorne, Boeck.
„ melaniceps, Boeck.
„ Normani, n. sp.
„ gracile, n. sp.
„ erythrops, Brady.
ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI.
One of the autennre.
X200.
x200.
X300.
Xl70.
X 380.
x300.
x300.
X300.
X 300.
X300.
x300.
X300.
x333.
X300.
59
■144
MESSRS. T. AND A. SCOTT — EEVISION OF THE BEITISH COPEPODA
Fis
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
2-1.
25.
2G.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Ectinosoma prupinquum, n. sp.'
;, Herdmani, n. sp.
„ armiferuin, n, sp.
„ erythrops, Brady.
„ tenuipes, n. sp.
J. pyyinaaum, n. sp.
„ Sarsi, Boeck.
„ melaniceps, Boeck.
,, atlanticuni (B. & R.)
„ curticorne, Boeck.
„ longicorne, n. sp.
„ Normani, u. sjj.
,, tenuireme, n. sp.
„ gracile, n. sp.
„ Herdmani, i\. sp.
„ tenuipes, n. sp.
„ armiferum, n. sp.
„ pjrojnnqmim , n. sp.
,, lonyicorne, u. sp.
,, Normani, n. sp.
„ atlanticum (B. & R.)
,, tenuireme, n. sp.
„ erythrops, Brady.
„ Sarsi, Boeck.
„ pffi/KPum., n. sp.
„ melaniceps, Boeck.
„ curticorne, Boeck.
„ erythrops, Brady.
„ pygm(Eum, n. sp.
„ lonijicorne, n. sp.
„ gracile, n. sp.
„ tenuireme, n. sp.
„ tenuipes, u. sp.
,, curticorne, Boeck.
„ melaniceps, Boeck.
„ atlanticum (B. & R.).
„ Normani, n. sp.
,, Sarsi, Boeck.
„ armiferum, n. sp.
,, Herdmani, u. sp.
„ propinquum, n. sp.
Mandible aud palp.
»
One of the anterior foot-jaws.
J?
>>
>i
One of the posterior foot-jaws.
xl70.
X540.
X253.
X253.
x253.
X 380.
X 170.
X253.
x2o3.
X253.
x333.
X 253.
X 253.
X200.
X380.
x300.
X 200.
X I'JO.
X 380.
X 380.
X 380.
x250.
xl90.
X 190.
x500.
X380.
X380.
X380,
X380.
X 333.
X333.
X 253.
x380.
X 380.
X380.
X 380.
x380.
x253.
X333.
x570.
X 190.
BELONGING TO THE GENERA BEADYA AND ECTINOSOMA.
M5
Fig.l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Ectitiosoma ienuireme, n. sp.
,, 7nt'lafiice/js, Bocck.
„ (jracile, u. sp.
,, jnjgiucBum, u. s|).
„ Normani, n. sp.
„ lomjicorne, ii. sp.
„ Hcrdmani, ii. sp.
„ curticorne, Boeck.
„ propinquuni, u. sp.
„ Sarsi, Boeck.
„ at/anticum (B. & R.).
„ ienulpes, n. sp.
,, erythrops, Brady.
„ armifcruiii, n. sp.
„ enjllirops, Brady.
„ atlanticum (B. & R.).
„ tenuipvs, 11. sp.
„ Normani, n. sp.
„ armiferum, n. sp.
,, curticorne, Boeck.
„ melaniceps, Boeck.
„ Sarsi, Boeck.
„ prupinijHHin, u. sp.
,, tenuireme, n. sp.
„ Herdmani, n. sp.
„ pygmfi'Uin, ii. sj).
,, graclle, n. sp.
,, longicorne, n. sp.
,, lonyicorne, n. sp.
„ grarile, u. sp.
'! piigmcenin, u. sp.
„ Sarsi, Boeck.
„ Herdmani, w. sp.
„ propinquum, ii. sj).
,, curticorne, Boeck.
,, tenuipes, ii. sp.
„ armiferum, n. sp.
„ atlanticum (B. & R.)
,, erythrops, Brady.
„ tenuireme, n. sp.
,, melaniceps, Boeck.
„ Normani, u. sp.
„ armiferum, ii. sp.
„ curticorne, Boeck.
„ Normani, u. sp.
Plate 38.
Foot of first pair of swimming-feet.
J)
J)
Foot of fourth pair of swimming-feet.
Foot of fiftli pair (female).
Abdomen and caudal stylets.
446 COPEPODA BELONGING TO THE GENERA BEADTA AND ECTINOSOMA.
Fig. 46. Ectinosoma melaniceps, Boeck.
Abdomen and caudal stylets.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Herdmani, n. sp.
erythrops, Brady.
tenuireme, n. sp.
longicorne, n. sp.
Sarsi, Boeck.
tenuipes, n. sp.
atlanticum (B. & R.).
propinquum, n. sp.
pygm<Bum, n. sp.
X 80.
X 80.
X 80.
X 53.
Xl27.
X 53.
xl27.
X 64.
X 53.
Xl27.
Scott.
[rams. Linn. Soc Zor
%
^.=•=.2. Vol .VI. PI. 35,
'^-^ -^^ ^
13
/./
\
■'f , ':
4 V
■v^l
/•^,
k3-^.^
//
~*>^.-
v^'tK^ \
iS=-'^*^x
.^■^'
i '* N'-v,
■.I ,i'
\
• tin'^
|j \
I
1 \VA: ^ f||
K J 1
■ I
A-^x .^.
i H
\
H
3H^
'\
Trans. Linn, Soc . Zooi. Sfb. 2. Vo1.\1.P1.36.
./
ill
, ! .'^f
y ^
■1
<^.-
^
^m
/;
#^:
).-riS..n,n|l
/^■>
'^%;i
\
'^'■^<y^
's(¥
\
.3d '-^
I 7i
■V
Aadrrw Scott d-isdcn"
ATiloilicVl-.t:!.
- ---> '^V
3?.ITISH COFZPODA. BRADYa AND ECTINOSOMA,
Trak3 Limn Sog Zooi..Ser.2 VolVL.P137
Andrew Scott dr.l. ad nat
A THcOiick lith
W^st.Newiuan, Hi.p
BRITISH COPEPODA. EGTINOSOM.
'T^ATT^^ ^INI-;
vAil •
K
rh
lf\
3
' m
h\
.V W- Hi
\ •/ -,.
'■■*■
" v/ Xf 4.
1 1
•' ;,' \
^^-/
"1 ^
A%
« 1 rA^'
s f)
f' i
^ j "Z
^^•/r' 1
^f^i
P /I
--"rf V.
f i
liflfl
II *■■
^ m
i"T^
f \>. ,.
Andre^ff Scott <1&1 £
ATHDllicklitii.
V,>-t l^tvni:
BRITISH COPEPODA, ECTINflSOMA
LINNEAN SOCIETT OF LONDON.
MEMORANDA CONCERNING TRANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and 6s. to Fellows; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
wrapper) : —
When Price to the
Volume. Published. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Series. — Zoology.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 .
Part III. 1876 1 8 0 .
Part IV, 1877 0 16 0 .
Part V. 1877 0 18 0 .
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 .
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 .
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 .
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 .
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XV. 1885 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
Part XVIII. 1888 0 2 6 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
Volume.
When
Published.
Price to the
Public.
£ s. d.
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
Seconb Series. — Zoology (continued).
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0 . .
Part II. 1884 112 0 . .
Part III. 1885 1 10 0 . .
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0 . .
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0 . .
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0 . .
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 . .
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0 . .
Part II. 1888 0 5 0 . .
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 . .
Part IV. 1890 0 12 0 . .
Part V. 1890 0 6 0 . .
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0 . .
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 ..
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 ..
Part IX. 1892 0 12 0 . ,
Part X. 1893 1 8 0 . .
Part XI. 1894 0 2 6 . .
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 . .
Part II. 1894 Ill 0 . .
Part III. 1894 0 10 0 . .
Part IV. 1896 1 4 0 . .
Part V. 1896 0 10 0 . .
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PART 6.
THE
(o^f/l.
■ l.^'l
TRANSACTIONS
OP
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
ON SOME NEW OR RARE PHASMID^ IN THE COLLECTION
OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM.
BY
W. F. KIRBY, F.L.S., F.E.S.,
ASSISTANT IN THE 200LOOICAL DKPAllTJtRXT, BRITISH MUSEUM, SOUTH KENSINGTON'.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AM> FHAXCIS, HED I.ION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
Juhi 189G.
[ 447 ]
VI. On some iictc or rare Phasmidae /;/ the Collection of the Bi-itlsh Museum. By
W. r. KiKBY, F.L.S., F.E.S., Assistanl in the Zoological Department, British
Museum, South Kensington.
(Plates XXXIX. & XL.)
Read 5th December, 1895.
IHE Phasmida' are in many respects a very interesting group of insects, but their
study has been comparatively neglected. They attain a larger size than any other
existing insects known, and many of the species are of brilliant colours ; but they take
up much space in a cabinet, and when preserved in spirit, as is too often the case, their
colours are discharged, and they become brittle and unsightly grey, yellow, or brown
objects. (I never lose an opportunity of protesting against the indiscriminate use of
spirit by collectors. It is a most convenient mode of collecting, but is adapted only
for hard shining insects like bugs, beetles, and cockroaches, w^hich have no delicate
colours to bleach, exposed wings to tear, or pubescence to mtit.) Again, the
Bhasmidce are sluggish insects, highly protective in their apjiearance, and generally
to be found resting motionless on their food-plants. They are therefore difficult to
see and collect, and, as they are little studied, they have no market value ; and
amateurs who send out collectors to obtain butterflies or beetles sometimes expressly
discourage their collectors from paying attention to groups of insects which do not
interest them.
The Phasmidce are pre-eminently a tropical group, and probably attain their maximum
of size and l)eaiity in the Eastern Archipelago, from the Malay Islands to Australia
inckisive, though the number of species is perhaps greater in Trojiical America; and
in both these particulars they resemble butterflies. Foiu- small species only are found in
Europe south of the Alps, and of these only one, Fhasma gallicum, Charpentier, extends
as far north as South France, where it appears to be rare. In the United States likewise
only a few sjiecies occur, only one of which, Diapheroinera Sayi, Gray, crosses the
St. Lawrence into Canada, where it is found at Montreal. Several species are found in
China and Ja2)au, but their northern extension in Eastern Asia is not yet accurately
known. Southward, they extend to the Cape of Good Hope in Africa, and at least as
far as Chili in South America.
Many of the species are apterous in one or both sexes, while others have very large
wings. Sometimes they are perfectly smooth and rod-like ; but more frequently they have
spines on the head, legs, and body, sometimes simple, sometimes broad and triangular,
and often accompanied or replaced by large leaf-like expansions, especially in the species
of the Eastern genus PhylUum, IlHger, which present the exact appearance of green
veined leaves, and have always been known as " Walking Leaves." The Fhasmid^ in
general are known as "Walking Sticks," " Stick Insects," or " Spectres ;" and many
of the wingless species exhibit a very curious resemblance to dead twigs. Others are
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 60
448 MK. W. F. KIRHY ON NEW OR EARE
green, with jointed bodies (r. //. the genus HennarcJms, Stal), and present an exact
resemblance to slioots of l)anilioo, being seven or eight inches long, and as thick as a
finger. Smaller species, belonging to the genns Grcnffea, Bninner, are sometimes
extremely injurious to the cocoanut-trees in the South Sea Islands ; so much so that
the chiefs sometimes issue orders for their destruction bj'^ chopping them to pieces.
Many Phasmlda; exude a liquid from the l)ody when alarmed ; but this cocoanut feeder
is said to have the jiower of squirting a fluid, sufficiently acrid to cause blindness if it
touches the eyes, to a distance of four feet. Otherwise the Phasmidce appear to be
generally harmless, except sometimes, to vegetation ; and it is probably only a few
species which cause much mischief in this respect.
The largest species known belongs to the genus Pharnacia, Stal. It is from Borneo,
and the name of Pharnacia serratipes. Gray, has been provisionally attached to it in the
public Insect Room at the Natural History Museum, South Kensington. Accurate
measurements, taken by Mr. C. O. Waterhouse, will be found in the present paper ;
but in this place I need only say that it measures nearly 13 inches from th.e front of
the head to the extremity of the abdomen. Another specimen, from a doubtful locality,
measures only 10^ inches in total length ; but without more specimens it is impossible
to ascertain positively whether they belong to the same species or not, for except size,
and a possible difference in the comparative size of the spines (a character not easily
estimated when comparing a dried and a spirit specimen), I have not been able to detect
any characters by which to separate them. Moreover, in many Phasmidce, the males
differ very much from the females, being much smaller, slenderer, and with the spines,
&c., much less developed ; and it is therefore unsafe to attempt to pair the sexes, unless
they are received from the same locality and in the same collection. The type of
Pharnacia serratipes. Gray, is a slender winged insect, only <o^ inches in length ; and no
one has yet determined whether the two large apterous females to Avhich I have referred
belong to P. serratipes or to some allied species, of which the males are as yet undis-
covered. As a rule, the female insects are much commoner in collections than the males.
Many Phasmidce were described by the older writers, and a considerable umnber
were figured by Stoll in 1813, in his ' Representation des Spectres ou Phasmes.'
In 1833 George Robert Gray published the first part of a projected work on the
Entomology of Australia, containing 8 plates illustrating some of the magniiicent species
of that country ; and though this work was never continued, Gray jmblished a ' Synopsis
of the Species of Insects belonging to the Family of Phasmidce ' in 1835, describing a
considerable number of new genera and species.
In 1839 Burnieister gave a critical resume of the Pkasmidce in the second volume
of his 'Handbuch der Entomologie,' as also did De Haan of the Eastern species, in
1842, in his synopsis of Orthoptera in Temminck's splendidly illustrated ' Verhandelingen.'
In 1859 the British Museum issued one of its most important entomological
publications, — Westwood's quarto Catalogue of Pkasmidce, with 40 uncoloured plates.
Among the more important contributions to the knowledge of this group of insects
which have appeared since that date are Bates's " Descriptions of 52 new Species of
Pkasmidce," Trans. Liun. Soc. vol. xxv. (1805), and De Saussure's '• Melanges Orthoptero-
PHASMID^, IN THE BEITISH MlJtsEUM. 41»
logiques" (Mem. Soc. Phys. et d'Hist. Nat. (ieueve, xx.), and 'Mission Scientifiqne au
Mexique, Recherches Zool.' vi. (1869-70). All these publications are illustrated with
uncoloured plates.
Between the years 1855 and 1875 the active and industrious l)ut hasty and self-
opiniated Swedish entomologist, Dr. Stal, jiuhlished numerous jiapers on Orthoptera,
including a revision of the Phasmidce. These are scattered through the various
puhlications of the Vetenskaps Akademie of Stockholm, and are not only cast in the
form of very comj)licated tables, with numerous exce])tions, which make thein extremely
diilicult to follow, but the genera are frequently based on the examination of one or two
species oiily ; and lience it becomes difficult to judge how ftir the genera, as restricted by
him, correspoml witli those of other authors. Nevertheless his system was considerably
in advance of that of Westwood, w ho had regarded the presence or absence of wings as a
character of ^^ri'nai'y importance ; and in 1893 Brunner de Wattenwyl, when working
out Fea's Burmese collection of Orthoptera in the ' Annali del Museo Civico di Storia
Naturale di Genova,' ser. 2, vol. xiii. (or vol. xxxiii. of the whole series), took occasion to
sketch out a revision of the Order, including the PhasmidtB, wliich he divided into
12 families. The characters on which he relies are the form of the hind ti])ise beneath,
whether carinated to the tip or excavated ; the length of the antennae, as compared with
tliat of the front femora ; the length of the median segment ; the form of the terminal
segments of the abdomen, &c. The median segment is an important character, first
utilized by Stiil. In the Phasmidce the first segment of the abdomen is anchylosed with
the metathorax so as to form one piece with it, and in some cases so closely that the
point of division is barely distingviishable. Among other peculiarities, the suj)ra-anal
lamina of the female is a structure which may be absent or rudimentary, or, as in the
genus Promachus, it may be produced into a spine. The oj)erculum of the female is a
concave aj^jjiendage on the lower surface of the abdomen, which is sometimes so short as
to be covered by it, and sometimes forms a gutter jn-ojecting a long way beyond the
abdomen.
In the main, Brunner de Wattenwyl's divisions apj^ear to be natural, though some
of them will prol)ably require more or less modification before they can be finally
accepted. I have followed them in the present paper, in which I have endeavoured to
describe the greater part of the unpublished species in the Natural History Museum,
though there are others which I have passed over, beaiuse the material at my disposal
is at present insufiicient.
One or two additional points of special interest may be noticed before I jjroceed to the
systematic part of the paper. The Mantidce, or Praying Insects, are the nearest allies
of the Phasmidce ; but the former can always be distinguished by the long spines on the
front tibiae, which are used to kill and capture insect prey. No such arrangement is
found in the Phasmidce, which are all vegetable feeders. They are insects with
imperfect metamorphoses, and sometimes a leg is lost in one of the early stages and is
reproduced ; it is then much smaller than the corresponding leg on the opposite
side, and its spinous or lobate appendages, if any are present in the normal leg, are
reduced or absent.
60*
450
MH. W. F. KIKBi' ON NEW OR BARE
, The late Prof. Riley estimated the total number of existing species of insects at ten
millions (about 300,000 are known at present) ; and when it is considered that less than
a dozen species of such large insects as PhaHmidce are known from a locality so frequently
visited as Madagascar, and that our British species of parasitic Mymenoptera, among
which are the smallest insects known, are numl)ered l)y hundreds, although very
few entomologists have worked at them at all, Prof. Riley's estimate cannot be regarded
as excessive. Excepting the larger butterflies and beetles of the best-explored countries,
our knowledge of the insects of the world is far more incomplete than many persons,
even though experienced entomologists, might be inclined to suppose.
At present the Eritish Museum Collection of Phasniidce fills 120 cabinet-drawers,
but will soon require to be extended. More materials, at all events, are needed before
a satisfactory revision of the classification of Fhasmidce can be attempted.
Subfamily L o N c H o D I N .E.
Pharnacia serratipes.
Cladoxerus seiratipes. Gray, Synopsis of Phasmidse, p. 42 (1835).
Phibalosoma serratipes, Westw. Cat. Phasm. p. 75. u. 192 (1859).
This genus differs from most of the Lonchodmcp in having winged males.
Some particulars respecting the supposed females of this insect are given in the intro-
ductory portion of this paper. The colour, when alive, was evidently green, and the
legs are strongly carinated and spined, nearly as in the male ; but the body is otherwise
unarmed. The typical male is from Malabar. The dimensions of the large female from
Borneo are given below ; it will be seen that they are somewhat asymmetrical.
'Pharnacia serratipes, $ . Borneo.
Total length of body 1 foot 10 lines.
Length of head 65 „
„ prothorax 6^ „
„ mesothorax 32^ „
„ metathorax (incl. intermediate) 23 „
,, intermediate
„ front femur, right side
„ „ „ left side . .
„ middle ,, right side .
left
„ hind „ right „ . .
left
front tibia, right „ .
left
hind tibia (right and left)
front taisns, right side
left
hind ,, right ,,
left
lOf
34
37
31i
oqi
35i
33^
45i
49^
14
13
15
IG
14
The right tibia and tarsus are
more slender than the left.
PHASMID^ IN THE BEITISH .MUSEUM. 451
Pharnacia PONDEROSA.
Phamada ponderosa, Stal, CEfvers. Vet.-Akad. Fijrh. xxxiv. (10) p. tO (1877).
Still briefly describes the male. The British Museum possesses a female from Luzon
which may belong to this species. It is dull testaceous, mottled with brown, and has
rudimentary lighter-coloured tegmina, very distinctly longitudinally lined \dth black
along the nervures. The operculum is long, nai-row, and pointed. Length 135 millim.,
of tegmina 7 millim., of operculum 15 millim. 'J''he specimen is in too poor condition to
make it worth while to describe it in detail.
Myronides Ppeiffer^, var. (?).
Lonchodes Pfeifferce, Westw. Cat. Pliasm. p. 44, pi. v. fis^. 6.
The types are from Ceram. There is a male specimen in the British Museum from
Ternate, differing chiefly in the greater length of the metanotum, which is one-fifth
longer than the median segment. In this it agrees witli the female from Ceram ; in the
male from the latter locality the median segment and metanotum are almost exactly of
equal length. But I will not venture to describe the Ternate insect as new on a single
specimen.
V Lonchodes Whiteheadi, sp. n.
Female. Brown, cylindrical, strongly granulated ; head with two short, broad horns
between the eyes ; prothorax with two raised tubercles in front ; all the parts of the
thorax and the joints of the abdomen with a short, raised tubercle behind ; middle legs
shorter than the front or hind legs ; front femora very slightly dentated on the inner
carina before the extremity ; middle femora with two rounded lobes beneath, not
dentated, before the extremity ; hind femora with only the lobe on the inner carina
developed ; middle legs with traces of broad yellow bands ; metathorax black on the
sides and on the hinder part above ; abdomen with black triangles on the sides, which
probably meet on the back of some of the hinder segments. (Colours altered.)
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 75 millim.
„ capitis 6 „
„ pronoti 3^ „
„ mesonoti 20 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano .... 13 „
„ segmenti mediani 3 „
„ femorum anticorum 22 „
„ ,, medianorum 15 „
„ ,, posticorum 2o „
Albay, S.E. Luzon [Whitehead Ea-pedition).
452 ME. W. F. KIEBY ON NKW OK KARE
The lobate, undentated, middle and hind femora distinguish this from any other
species of the genus before me.
LONCHODES BaTESII, Sp. n.
Female. Cylindrical, brown (colours evidently altered), granulated. Head above
grooved, the groove passing between the black points on the vertex between the eyes ;
outside these are a pair of larger tubercles or short horns, outside Avhich subsidiary
grooves rmi obliquely to the central one. At the back of the head are likewise four
rather larger tubercles ; the central groove runs between the inner ones, and beyond the
outer ones other grooves run, slightly diverging, to the eyes ; below these is a row of
three small tubercles behind the eyes. Prothorax about as long as the head, with a
central groove and two transverse ones, one in front and the other about the middle; and
there are also two lateral grooves. The central groove is bordered on both sides, and the
lateral ones above, with rows of tubercles. At the back of the prothorax are two oblong
black spots in the middle, and a black dot on each side beyond them. The rest of the
thorax and the abdomen are not grooved, but carinated, along the median line. Antennae
long, setaceous, very finely pubescent, blackish at the extremities of the joints. Front
legs long, slightly compressed ; femora with the basal third irregularly serrated above,
and a row of fine blackish teeth at the extremity beneath, preceded by a larger tooth.
First joint of the tarsi (which is as long as the remaining joints without the claws)
black, as are likewise the rest of the tarsi. Intermediate and hind legs much shorter ;
femora with larger black terminal serrations and preceding lobe, but smooth above ;
tibiae with a lobe beneath towards the base ; tarsi black, except the greater part of the
first joint, which is much shorter than in the front legs.
The blackish apical portion of the middle and hind femora is preceded by a pale band,
probably yellow in the living insect.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 100 millini.
„ pronoti 5 ,,
,, raesonoti 34 „
„ metauoti, cum segmento mcdiano .... 15 „
„ segmeiiti mediani 5i „
„ femorum anticorum 24 „
,, „ mediauorum 17 „
„ „ posticorum . 23 „
Sab. Boroo (Bourn ?).
LONCHODES VIRGATUS, Sp. n.
Male. Cylindrical, brown, rather slender. Head granulated, not grooved, with two
small pointed horns between the eyes, and two tubercles opposite them on the hinder
border. Prothorax with shallow grooves, the longitudinal one not extending to the hind
PHASMTD^ IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. 453
border ; of tlie lateral ones, one is anterior and the other median. The rest of the
thorax and abdomen is finely granulated, with scarcely a trace of a longitudinal carina.
Front femora beneath with one large and one small tooth before the extremity of the
outer ridge, which is produced into a sharji spike ; middle femora with a large tooth
towards the extremity on each ridge, followed by four small ones on the inner, and two
small ones on tlie outer ridge ; hind femora with two or three small teeth on each side
before the extremity. First joint of tarsi flattened, depressed, not much longer than
tlie two following joints on all the legs. The left middle leg is deformed, being shorter
than the other, only imperfectly dentated, and with only four joints to the tarsi.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 94 millim.
„ pronoti 5 „
„ mesonoti 23 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano 17 „
„ segmenti mediaui 5 „
,, femorum anticoruin 21 „
,, femoris mediaui (dextri) 16 „
„ femorum posticorum 20 „
Hab. Boroo (Bouru ?).
Closely allied to L. brecipes. Gray, from Malabar, but differs in the character of the
toothing of the middle femora. The other femora are also more strongly toothed. The
abdominal appendages are nearly similar.
LONCHODES NIGROPUNCXATUS, Sp. n.
Female. Cylindrical, brownish grey ; clypeus and labrum smooth, yellowish ; two black
tubercles or short horns on the vertex behind the antennae, rather wide apart ; between
them commences a carina which extends to the extremity of the body, all parts of which
are irregularly covered with black granulations, largest on the head, behind the horns.
Several of the divisions between the segments are spotted with black on each side of the
median carina. Prothorax scarcely as long as the head, Avith the lateral ridges very
distinct. Antennae long, blackish above, except at the base ; basal joint very large,
compressed, and pubescent ; second joint longer and broader than the following
ones. Legs long ; middle legs rather shorter than the rest ; all the femora very
slightly dentated at the extremity of the middle carina. First joint of all the tarsi
slightly compressed, but not dilated, as long or longer than all the rest put together.
Median segment about one-fourth of the length of the metanotum, cut off straight
in front. Seventh segment of abdomen rather shorter than the preceding ones,
but about as long as the three terminal segments together. Segment 8 rather longer
than 9 ; 10 about as long as 9, slightly concave above, and produced into a short point
at the sides.
454. MK. W. F. KIKBY ON NEW OR KAKE
Dimensions.
Loug. corporis 112 inilliiu.
„ capitis 0 „
Lat. „ 3 „
Long, pronoti 5 „
„ mesouoti 15 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediauo 19 ,,
„ segmenti mediani 5 ,,
„ femorum anticorum 26 „
„ „ medianorum 21 ,,
„ ,, posticorum 24 „
Hah. Lizard Island, N.E. coast of Australia.
LoNCHODES Catori, sp. n.
Hale. Cylindrical, slender, with long and slender legs. Head, prothorax, and first
two joints of the antennae red ; antennae otherwise rufous-brown. Femora green, red at
the base and tip ; the tibiae and tarsi red or reddish, more or less shading into brown
above. Anterior femora with one moderate-sized spine beneath, near the extremity, on
the inner carina ; middle femora with two spinose ridges at the extremity beneath,
with three or four red black-ti2)ped spines on each side ; hind femora witli one tooth, and
some smaller denticulations at the extremity beneath. Mesothorax narrowly red at the
base, and broadly at the extremity, where it is much expanded. Metathorax narrowly
red at the base, and at its extremity for about the same length as the median segment,
which is likewise red, with a large square blackish imtch covering its basal half.
Median segment scarcely one-sixth as long as the metathorax. Abdomen olive-gi'een,
narrowly reddish at the ends of the segments, and tinged with rufous towards the
extremity.
A specimen which appears to be an immature female of this species is much greener,
being merely tinged with rufous on the prothorax, median segment (which wants the
dark blotch), and towards the extremities of the meso- and metathorax, and of the femora
and abdomen, &c. It measures 70 millim. in length. The dimensions of the male are as-
follows : —
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 88 raillim.
„ capitis ■!• „
„ pronoti 3 „
,, mesouoti 22 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano 18 „
„ segmenti mediani 6 „
femorum anticorum 24
„ medianorum 19
„ posticorum 22
Sandakan, N. Borneo.
PHASMID.E IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. 455
A very pretty species, allied to L. geniculatus. Gray, and ye'niculosvs, Westw., which
I believe to be distinct species ; but in both these the head is green. The insect formed
part of an interesting collection jDresented by Douglas Cator, Esq.
Chondrostethus, gen. nov.
Long and slender, with long and slender legs ; head long, bicornuted, antennas longer
than the front legs, at least in male, scape twice as long as broad, depressed and carinated,
especially in female ; second joint shorter, less depressed, about IJ times as long as
broad, and narrowed from base to extremity ; tibiaj slightly longer than femora; front
legs longer than the others, middle legs shortest, all the femora with small terminal
teeth beneath ; first joint of tarsi longer than all the rest together, except in the middle
legs, where they are of about the same length ; front femora at base, front tibiae at base
and before the extremity, basal joint of front tarsi, and base of middle tibiae furnished
with long, but not broad, foliations; median segment about half as long as the meta-
thorax, anterior edge straight ; metanotum with a rounded warty excrescence on each
side at the extremity in the male ; hind legs extending about to the extremity of the
three segments of the abdomen beyond the basal segment; three terminal segments of
abdomen in male of nearly equal length, hardly dilated, the last slightly longer than the
two preceding, tectiform, and excavated at the extremity.
Chondeostethus Woodfordi, sp. n. (Plate XXXIX. figs. 1, 1 «, d ; figs. 2, 2 a, ? .)
Brown ; prothorax as long as the head, with a longitudinal gi'oove, and transverse
grooves in front and in the middle ; tliere are also several incomplete grooves on each
side of the longitudinal one. In the female these grooves are much stronger than in
the male, and the back of the prothorax is alternately marked with black and yellowish.
In the female, too, the insect is strongly granulated (very slightly in the male), especially
on the head, pi'othorax, and mesothorax ; on the lateral borders these take the form of
a series of small tubercles. The male is much more slender thao the female.
Dimensions.
S- ?.
millim. millim.
Long, corporis ~5 124
„ pronoti 3 4'5
,, mesonoti 18 31
„ metatiotij cum segmento mediano .... 12 19
„ segmenti mediani 4"5 7
„ femorum anticorum 22 33
„ ,, medianorum 14 23
„ „ posticorum 20 26
Sab. Solomon Islands ( Woodford).
The genus Thr'asyllus was founded by St31 on a male insect from the Philippines,
which he called T. macilentus. The present species agrees with the characters given by
Stal in many resj)ects, especially in the very long antennae, and the excrescences on the
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 61
456 MR. W. F. KIRBT ON NEW OR RARE
metanotiim ; the latter, however, are deserihed hy Stal as squamiforni rudiments of
wings. The tibiae and tarsi are described as compressed and dilated ; but in the male
before me they are hardly to be called compressed, and there is only the faintest indication
of a dilatation at the extremity of the front tibiae. As this character is usually much
more strongly marked in the females than in the males, the female of Stal's insect would
probably more resemble those of the genus Dixippus ; and having both sexes of
C. TFoodfordi before me I have thought it more satisfactory to treat it as the type of a
new genus.
Gbeenia, gen. nov.
Cylindrical ; head with two acute spines between the eyes, rising from a ridge ; body
granulated ; legs moderately long and slender, unarmed, except for a small rounded
lobe on the upper surface towards the base of the middle femora in the female, terminal
segment carinated (at least in female) and ending in a wide obtuse fork.
This cui'ious genus is not closely allied to any other. Bates described and figured
both sexes of a Phasmide under the name oi Lonchodes furcatus in Trans. Linn. Soc. xxv,
p. .335, pi. xliv. figs. 5, 6, from Ceylon. Among some PhasmidcB recently brought from
Ceylon by Mr. E. Ernest Green, to whom the British Museum has been indebted for
so many interesting additions to its entomological collections, I find a female of this
species, and have much pleasure in calling the uncharacterized genus to which it belongs
after Mr. Green, who is, I may mention, at present engaged on a monograph of the
Coccid(JS of Ceylon, a large and practically; unworkcd subject, of great importance to
planters and agriculturists. Mr. Green's insect agrees in all essential points with
Bates's figure, except that it is apparently less strongly granulated. In the absence of
a series, it would be foolish to describe the insect as new, on this doubtful character
only.
Hebmogenes, stal.
Hermogenes, Stal, Rev. Ortli. iii. p. 8, note (1875).
Prisomera, pt., Gray, Syu. Phasm. p. 15 (1855); Westw. Cat. Phasm. p. 47 (1859); Brimn. Ann.
Mus. Genov. xxxlii. p. 81 (1893).
Under the present genus we may include : —
1. Lonchodes per sonatus, Bates, Trans. Linn. Soc. xxv. p. 33G, pi. xliv. fig. 7 (1865), from Bouru.
2. Phasina femorata, Stoll, Pliasm. p. 44, pi. xiv. fi^. 54 (Amboina).
3. Phasnia (Acanihoderus) verrucosum, De Haan, Orth. p. 136, pi. xiv. fig. 1 (Sunnatra).
(The type of Prisomera, Gray, is his spinicolUs from Ceylon, Avhich is not congeneric
with these.)
Female. Body cylindrical, granulated, not spiny, but sometimes with lobate excres-
cences on the back ; antennae slender, generally shorter than the front legs ; legs
short, femora spiny beneath, legs more or less compressed, especially the front tibiae ;
all the femora dentated beneath at the extremity ; front and intermediate femora
and tibife more or less foliaceous ; first joint of front tarsi not much longer than
the second.
PHASMID-^ IN THE BKITISH MUSEUM. 457
Hermogenes cristatus, sp. n.
Female. Cylindrical, brown, rugose ; antennEe testaceous, spotted with brown at the
joints. Head with a very slight, quadrifid transverse ridge between the eyes ; a raised
foliaceous crest, much broken and divided, at tlie ends of the pro- and mesothorax ; two
strong spines at tlie end of the second segment of tlie abdomen (reckoning the median
segment, which is about one-third of the length of the metathorax, as the first), and two
long ear-like lobes at the end of the seventh. Antennte with the scape much flattened.
Front femora with a foliaceous exj^ansion of the lateral cariuoe beneath, and terminating
above in a sliort strong spine, surrounded by two or three smaller ones. The outer lower
carina is jiroduced into a vei-y large cultriform process, followed by a shorter spine.
Front femora much widened and compressed, with a very large rounded lobe, towards the
extremity above, which is directed forward, and deutated above and in front. Middle
femora flattened and foliaceous, with two small rounded projections at tlie base above,
a large one near the middle, directed forward, and dentated above and in front, and a
strong tooth at the extremity ; this is preceded by a yellowish band. Beneath is a row
of strong teeth, decreasing in size towai'ds the extremity. Middle tibite with two
foliaceous crests, each slightly depressed in the middle, towards eacli extremity. Hind
femora with a strong tooth at the extremity above, and a row of teeth, decreasing in
size, towards the extremity below ; about the middle is a yellow spot. Hind tibiae with
slight foliaceous expansions on the carinas at their base below and at their extremity
above. Tarsi without foliaceous expansions, the first joint hardly longer or broader than
the others.
Bimeiisioiis.
Long, corporis 110 millim.
,, capitis 5 „
„ pronoti 6 „
„ iriesonoti 27 „
„ metauoti, cum segmeuto mediaiio .... 18 „
,, segraenti mediani 0 ,,
„ leinoriuu auticorum 19 ,,
,, „ medianorum 15 ,,
„ ,, posticoriiui 20 „
Hah. Baram District, North Borneo.
Collected by Mr. C. Hose.
Allied to I£. verrucosus, De Haan, from Sumatra.
Hermogenes Hosei, sp. n. (Plate XL. figs. 1, 1 a.)
Female. Cylindrical, dark brown, rugose and granulated ; prothorax with a depressed
cross, the hinder part rising into a slight median carina, wbich is continued, rather indis-
tinctly, along most of the thorax and abdomen. Fifth segment of abdomen with a transverse
foliaceous raised lobe at the extremity; sixtli with a short longitudinal raised foliaceous
lobe on each side of the median line near the base of the segment. Front femora with four
long foliaceous carime beneath, the two middle ones unarmed, the inner one forming an
strc
Gl*
irregular waved row of large rounded serrations, and the outer one with a strong cultri-
458 ME. W. F. KIKBY ON NEW OE EAEE
form projection, followed by a smaller one, towards the extremity. At the upper extremity
of tlie front femora are some sliort strong teeth. Front tibiae much compressed, with
raised foliaceous expansions above and below, the upper one expanded into a long lobe,
rounded above, towards the base, and terminating in one or more short teeth, one under
the other ; lower expansion slightly enlarged at its base. Middle femora with two
projections near the base above, a large foliaceous expansion near the middle, irregularly
serrated above, and followed by a slighter projection ; and a very prominent tooth at the
extremity ; beneath there is a large tooth, followed by some small denticulations towards
the extremity. Middle tibite with two raised rounded projections towards the base, and
three more pointed ones towards the extremity. Tarsi not lobate ; the first hardly longer
than the others.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis Ill millim.
„ capitis 6
,, pronoti 6
„ mesonoti 25
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano .... 18
„ segmenti mediani 6
„ femorum anticorum 19
„ „ medianorum 16
„ ,, posticorum 19
Sab. Baram District, North Borneo, collected by Mr. C. Hose.
Allied to the last species.
DiXIPPUS STJMATRANUS.
Phasnia sumatranum, De Haan, Orthoptera, pi. xiii. fig. 6 (1842).
Phasma [Bacteria) nodosiim, S , De Haan, I. c. p. 133 (1842).
Male. Slender, cylindrical, reddish brown. Prothorax with a depressed cross, the central
line of which is continued on the vertex, and then divides into a Y> the arms of which
run to the eyes. The front ends in a slight transverse ridge in front of the eyes, with a
rudimentary horn on each side. Segments of the abdomen slightly carinated, more
distinctly so towards the apex; the two penultimate segments mvich expanded, the last
twice as long as broad, and cleft nearly to the base, the femora slightly dentated at the
extremity of the femora beneath, most strongly on the middle femora.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 100 millim.
., capitis
, pronoti
., raesoiioti
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano ....
, segmenti mediani
„ femorum anticorum
,, ,, medianorum .......
„ „ posticonim 24
PHASMID^ IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. 459
The British Museum has a long series of both sexes from Baram, North Borneo,
collected bj^ Mr. C. Hose. The female is well represented by De Haan's figure ; but the
male from Java, to which he refers it, is evidently distinct. The males of Phasmidce
are very ditfereut from the females, and can rarely be satisfactorily paired with them
without evidence.
DiXIPPUS SODALIS, sp. n.
Male. Long, slender, olive-brown, very finely and closely granulated. Head scarcely
longer than broad, with two short horns projecting forward, above and a little in front
of the eyes, and witli a row of four small tubercles at the hinder extremity above.
Antennae with the scape much tliickened, and twice as long as broad ; the greater
part of the flagellum, except towards the base, is blackish. Front tarsi blackish from
beyond the middle of the first joint to the extremity; the first joint is about as long as
the three following, which successively diminish in length. Legs slender, with two
pairs of large teeth at the extremity of the middle femora beneath, and two very small
pairs on the other femora. Abdomen with the terminal segment but slightly expanded.
Apical segment cleft to the base, about three times as long as broad.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 95 mill
„ capitis 3 ,
,, pronoti 3'5
„ mesouoti 25
,, metauoti, cum segmento mediano .... 18
„ segmenti mediaiii 4
„ femorum auticorum 25
„ ,, mediaiiorum 15
„ „ posticorum 21
. Hah. Baram District, Borneo.
Collected by Mr. C. Hose.
Closely resembles the male of D. snmatranus, with which it was received, but diff'ers
by the short horns, and the different shape of the terminal segments of the abdomen.
DiXIPPUS CORNUTUS, sp. n.
Female. Cylindrical, brown, speckled, and varied with grey ; finely and thickly
granulated. Head oblong, scarcely narrowed behind, and luirdly granulated; face mostly
green; two large horns on the vertex between the eyes, bordered with black on the
inside ; and there is a short black streak between each horn and the eye. Prothorax
with cross-shaped grooves, and two more transverse grooves on the front lialf ; behind it
a well-marked but slender carina runs down the rest of the body. Mesothorax slightly
expanding behind, with lateral carinte ; and towards its extremity two short black
carinse run backward from each side, meeting on the central carina at four-fifths of its
460 ME. W. F. KIEBT ON NEW OR EAEE
length. Median segment one-third as long as the metanotum, the front curving slightly
backward on the sides ; at about half its length is a slightly marked brown carina, on each
side, curving inward to the middle. Segment 7 of abdomen only slightly shorter than 6 ;
segment 8 about two-thirds as long as 7, and as long as 9 and 10 together ; 10 rather
longer than 9, and widely concave at the extremity above. Legs short and thick,
slightly compressed ; all the femora lobate-dentate at the extremity beneath on each
carina, and the base of the tibiae furnished with a centi-al lobe beneath, which fits in
between the femoral lobes ; first joint of the front tarsi strongly lobate above; middle and
hind femora with the grey dusting forming a broad band towards the extremity ;
segment 7 of the abdomen moderately lobate beneath on the lateral carinse at the
extremity ; segment 6 only slightly so.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 115 millim.
„ capitis 6 „
,, proDOti 5 „
„ mesouoti 24 „
„ metauoti, cum segmento niediano .... 20 „
„ segmenti mediaui 5 „
„ femorum anticoruin 20 „
„ mediauorLim 18 „
„ posticorum 20 „
3t
Hah. Hong Kong.
Not unlike D. nodosus, De Haan, but with shorter legs, much longer horns, and the
middle femora not lobate above.
DiXIPPUS (?) INSTJLARIS, Sp. n.
Female. Cylindical. Brown, granulated, head with a low transverse crest on the
vertex, between the eyes, curving downward and inward at the ends ; a row of raised
warts, larger than the others, before the extremity of the head. Scape of the antennae
very broad and flattened, broadest in the middle, and about half as long again as broad ;
down the middle of the body runs a low median carina, except on the prothorax, which
is marked with a shallow cross-shaped depression. Pront femora beneath with a central
ridge, and a pair of outer carinae, closely api^roximating, at the sides, the outermost
denticulated towards the extremity, and the innermost serrulated throughout its length.
The front tibiae are greatly compressed, and the upper ridge is slightly waved and at the
extremity it projects obtusely forward. The first joint of the front tarsi has a flattened
foliaceous ridge above, Avhich raises it to the height of the tibite; it is nearly as long as
the remaining joints together. The four hinder femora are slightly denticulated at the
extremity beneath ; and their tibiae are slightly lobate near the base beneath, and are
also slightly thickened towards the extremity. The median segment is rather long
PHASMID.E IN THE BEITISH MUSEUM. 461
for true Dl.nppfis; and the fifth and sixth segments of the abdomen are somewhat
exi^anded.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 140 millim.
,, capitis 6 „
„ pronoti fi „
„ mcsonoti 32 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano .... 20 ,,
„ segmenti mecliani 8 „
femorum anticorum 33
„ mcdianornm 22
„ posticorum 27
JIab. Thursday Island.
The type is not in very good condition, but I think it well to describe it, as very few
PJiasmkhe are knoAvn from the New Guinea district.
It has considerable resemblance to D. crawangensis, De Haan, from Java, but is much
stouter.
Phasgania Everetti, n. g. et sp. (Plate XL. figs. 2, 2 a.)
Female. Cylindrical, brown, granulated dorsally and laterally as far as the middle of
the mesothorax, with larger lateral tubercles on the sides of the mesothorax. Head
unarQied, rather long, rounded and depressed, about as long as the prothorax, the rest
of the body with a slight longitudinal carina, exce^jt towards the end of the mesothorax,
which is much dilated behind, and marked with several slight transverse carince, as is
also the median segment, and the extremities of the metatliorax and of most of the
abdominal segments. Prothorax scarcely thickened, and metatliorax not at all. Median
segment aljont one-fourth as long as the metatliorax. Abdomen with segments 3-6
much tiiickened, nodose, the 7th as long as the 6th, but only half as broad, even at the
extremity, which is broadest ; the 8tli narrower, and about two-thirds as long as the 7th ;
the 9th broader than long ; the lOtli narrower, slightly longer ttian the 9th ; and the
11th forming a spine, longer than the 9th and 10th together, and jirojccting far beyond
the ojierculum. Legs, especially the two front pairs, much comjiressed and carinated,
but the carinations are only slightly lobate towards the base of the middle tibiae beneath;
the first joint of the front tarsi, however, which is longer than the three following joints,
bears a foliaceous expansion, as in Dlxippus. The middle femora are armed at the
extremity beneath witii a closely approximating pair of two very strong teeth ; the
front and hind femora are only armed with one conspicuous tooth and some smaller
denticulations.
462 ME. W. F. KIEBY ON NEW OE EAEE
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 135 millim.
,, capitis 6 ,,
„ pronoti 5 „
,, mcsonoti 31 „
„ metanoti, cum segmeiito mediano .... 24 ,,
„ segmenti mediam 7 ,,
„ femorum anticorum 30 ,,
,, ,, mediauorum 21 „
„ J, posticorum 24 „
Sah. N.W. Borneo {Everett).
This interesting sjjecies, vcliich I have named after Mr. A. Everett, who has done such
good work in collecting in the East, is allied to Dixippus, hut its rounded head and the
peculiar formation of the abdomen will readily distinguish it. In several respects we
fijid a resemblance to it in the female of {Lonchocles) brevipes, Gray, which has the
metathorax not expanded, hut some of the abdominal segments swollen, and the last
slightly produced over the operculum. [L.) brevipes, and perhaps (i.) tmiformis, Westw.,
may ultimately form a new genus allied to Phasgaiiia.
Sthenob^a tuberculata, sp. n.
Female. Cylindrical, moderately stout, rufo-testaceous ; antennse spotted with black at
the joints ; liead long, slightly attenuated behind, with a transverse crest in front,
between the eyes, slightly raised at each angle; front femoi'a obtusely serrated above,
and front tibia? both above and below; first joint of the front tarsi rather longer than the
three following, and furnished with a leaf-like expansion ; middle and liind femora
serrated or rather waved in a similar manner", and with leaf-like expansions on the upper
surface of the femora near the base, largest on the middle femora. Several conspicuous
black tubercles arranged, not uniformly, but irregularly in rows on the upper surface
and sides of the thorax and abdomen, and much more numerously in a row on each
side of the median line on the under surface ; oj^erculum very broad and concave, as long
as the terminal segment.
Dimensiofis.
Long, corporis 91 millim.
„ capitis 5 ,,
„ pronoti 3 „
,, mesonoti 23 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediano .... 11 „
„ segmenti median! 3 „
„ femorum anticorum 28 „
„ „ mediauorum 23 ,,
„ „ posticorum 22 „
Hob. Rejang Eiver, Sarawak.
Presented by Mr. H. Brooke Low.
A rather isolated species.
PHASMIDyE in the BRITISH MUSEUM. 465
Bactricia, gen. uov.
Apterous in both sexes : very long and slender ; liead with two strong spinous
processes on the vertex in the male ; lamellated processes in the female placed near
together; legs inibescent, especially the tarsi ; tirst joint of tarsi as long or longer than
all the rest, not apjiendiculated, but carinated in the female ; legs unarmed in male,
armed with strong subtriangular spines in female, on the carinas above and below ;
median segment one-tifth the length of the metanotum in male, one fourth in female ;
styles of male large, broad, almost spatulate, and strongly curved, crossing each other ;_.
operculum of female very long, longer than the last three segments of the abdomen
together ; obtusely rounded and slightly expanded at the extremity.
The type is
Bactricia Trophimus. (Plate XXXIX. tigs. 3, 3 «, d ; figs. 1, 4 a, ? .)
(^. Bacteria Trophimus, Westw. Cat. Pliasiii. p. 30. ii. 85. pi. v. fig. 5 (1859).
? . Bacteria bituberculata, Westw. 1. c. ]j. 180. n. 467 (1859); Scliaum, Monatsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin,
1857, p. 423 ; Peters, Reise nach Mossambique, v. p. 558 (1862).
The female figured is from Natal, but appears to agree with the description given by
Westwood of the typical specimen in the Berlin Museum. Unlike as the sexes ajipear
at first sight, they present so many points of resemblance on a close examination, in
everything except the form of the horns, and in the appendages of the legs in the
female, that I feel justified in placing them together. Besides the typical male, there
are two other males very closely resembling it, also from Natal, in which the cephalic
horns are reduced to mere tubercles. In the absence of a sufiicient series, I content
myself with simply recording the fact.
I am not certain of the real affinities of this genus, and place it in the Lonchodince
with some doubt.
There are one or two other East-African species allied to Bactricia in the Bi'itish
Museum, but in poor condition and only in single specimens. One of these, from Natal,
appears to be referable to Phibalosoma calametmn. Bates (Trans. Linn. Soc. xxv. p. 3il),
and differs from Bactricia in the sides of the tarsi being raised.
In [Phasma) calcaratum, De Haan, the median segment is likewise very short.
Promachus sordidus, sp. n. (Plate XL. figs. 4, 4 a.)
Female. Dark brown, rugose, with a depressed line on the head and prothorax, and a
crossed depression on tlie latter ; the rest of the body strongly carinated on the median
line. Pcniora with three or four rows of small teeth on the carina3. Head with two
strong spines at the back, followed by two in front of the prothorax and two behind ;
mesonotum with three strong spines on each side, two central ones just behind the level
of the middle lateral ones, and two more central ones at the extremity. Metathorax,
median segment, and the remaining segments of the abdomen all with a single spine
towards the extremity, on the central carina, gradually diminishing in length towards
the end of the body. Metathorax with a long spine, preceded by a short one on the
sides, and another strong spine lower down, in front of the hind coxae. Segments 2-(>
second series.— zoology, vol. vi. 62
464 ME. W. F. KIEBY ON NEW OR RARE
of tlie abdomen eacli with a moderately long spine on the sides. Abdominal spine
extending for nearly half its length beyond the operculum.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 55 millim.
,, capitis 4 „
„ pronoti .3'5 ,,
„ mesonoti 19 „
„ metanoti, cum segmento mediauo .... 6 ,,
„ segmenti mediani 3 „
„ femorum auticorum 15 „
„ „ medianorum 13 ,,
„ „ posticorum 16 „
Hob. Thursday Island. Collected by the late Rev. R. Toy. Described from two
specimens, in one of which, which is slightly smaller than the type, the spines and
denti dilations are less strongly develojjed.
Allied to P. doreyaniis, Bates, but this species has the legs unarmed, except slight
denticrdations at the ends of the femora beneath ; there is only one spine instead of two
at the back of the metathorax ; the mesothorax is more slender, and the first pair of
lateral spines is wanting, besides other differences.
Bacunculin^.
Several genera referred by Brunner de Wattenw^yl to his family BacteriidtB would be
more naturally placed here, such as Bacteria, Serv., and Phanocles, Stal, which seem to
be nearly allied to Calynda, St&l. In the place of Brunner's Bacteriidce, I propose to
institute a subfamily PaJophhue, to include large species, with winged males.
Caulonia spinosissima, sp. n. (Plate XL. figs. 5, 5 a.)
Female. Moderately stout, greenish brown, the sutures of the prothorax and the
median carina on the meso- and metathorax marked with a black line, which is expanded '
on the front of each. Head greenish, short, vertical, face rather long ; a black median
line, on each side of which are three long spines and a longer and more oblique one out-
side the second. Antennse very long and slender. Prothorax bilobate, with two spines
on each lobe, the front spines separated by the median depression, but beyond the trans-
verse depression the two spines are central, with a groove running on each side beyond
them. Mesothorax with six longitvidinal rows of spines, of four each, but not placed
under each other ; a double central row separated by the median line ; a longer row
lower down, and a lateral row of short ones. Metathorax similarly armed, but the
central and lower spines nutnbering three each, and the intermediate row of large spines
two ; there are also tw^o central spines on the median segment, and two in front of the
hind coxpe. Second segment of the abdomen (reckoning the median sen^ment as the
first) with two spines at the base, two at the extremity, and one on each side below the
latter. Third segment w^ith the opines similarly arranged, but larger, and the terminal
central ones preceded by tw o small ones ; segments 4, 5, and 6 similarly armed at the
extremity only; but the spines, except those at tlie sides, become gradually smaller, and
PHASMID^ IN THE BEITISH MUSEUM. 465?
on 6 tlie lateral spines ave absent. Segment 7 has only two short central terminal spines.
The remaining segments are more slender, and unarmed. Operculum large, extending
considerably beyond the terminal segment. Legs rather long and slender ; front femora
with a single row of triangular teeth beneath, placed at about equal distances ; the 4th
largest; fovu" hinder femora with two rows of larger ones of five each on the under
surface. On the vinderside of the body there is a double row of short median spines.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 58 millim.
,, capitis 2"5 ,,
„ pronoti 3 „
„ mesonoti 14 ,,
,, metanoti, cum segmento mediano .... 11 ,,
,, segmenti racdiani 2*5 ,,
„ femorum aiiticorum 20 ,,
„ „ medianorum 13 „
„ „ posticorum 20 „
HaJ). Archidona.
This species appears to belong to Ccmlonia, but is much more spiny than any
previously described. C. hifoUa, Stal, probably approaches it most nearly in this
respect.
Palophin^.
This subfamily includes, inter alia, a series of interesting African Pliasmidcp, in which
the males are slender, with large wings ; and the females are stout, with shorter wings.
They have usually foliaceous or large spiny prominences on the legs, and the head is
crested, or more or less spined. The terminal segment is broad, slightly concave at
the extremity, and extends far beyond the operculum in the female. They are generally
classed under the genus Palophus, Westwood, but have been divided into several genera.
The genera already named are the following. (How far they are truly distinct Avill
best be seen when we receive more specimens of both sexes.)
. . Palophus, Westw.
Palophus, Westw. Cat. Phasm. p. 90 (1859) ; Brongniart, Nouv. Ann. Mus. Paris (3) xii. p. 193 (1892).
The types are P. Haworthii, Gray (South Africa), and P. centaurus, Westw. (West
Africa). They have a long double pointed crest on the vertex, between the eyes, and
the thorax, though strongly granulated, has no raised spines. The second joint of the
front tarsi is lobate as well as the first. I have both sexes of these species before me,
but only females of any of the allied forms. These two species are perhajis not con-
generic ; for in the female of P. Haworthii the wings are no longer than broad, while in
that of P. centaurus they are nearly twice as long as broad, and the.mesothorax is much
longer and slenderer in proportion than in P. Saioorthii. But I do not propose to
separate these species generically, until more sj)ecimens are obtained. I imagine that
Palophus miiiotauriis, Gerstaecker, from the Gold Coast, is probably congeneric with
P. centaurus.
62*
466 MR. W. F. KIRBY ON NEW OR RA.RE
IscHNOPODA, Grandidier.
I.tchnopoda, Grandidier, Rev. Zool. xxi. p. 292 (1869) ; Lucas, Ann. Soe. Ent. Fr. (4) ix. p. 430 (1870).
The type of this genus is I. Beyl, Grandid., from the Zambesi. To the same genus
belong Bactrododema brevitarsls, Stal, from Damara-land, and a fine new species from
Tanganyika, which I describe below. The females vary considerably in comparative
length and. breadth of wing, but have always at least two strong diverging spines (not
symmetrical) about the middle of the mesothorax, and the boss on the tegmina is rather
long and pointed. The first joint only of the front tarsi is lobate.
ISCHNOPOBA. EPISCOPALIS, sp. n.
Female. Grey, varied with darker, a high double laminated crest, obtuse above,
between the eyes ; head thickly tuberculate, the rest of the body coarsely granulated, and.
striated, the rugse forming irregular stria? on the pro- and mesothorax ; two sharp spines,
black at the tiji, standing obliquely outwards before the middle of the mesothorax ;
segments 5 and 6 of the abdomen with a slight crest on each side before the extremity ;
tegmina grey, rather long, with a high rounded elevation near tlie base, tipped with
blackish ; wings with the costal area grey, indistinctly varied with darker, and broadly
black at the base ; wings long and broad, black, with irregular yellowish hyaline bands,
converging, anastomosing, and disappearing beyond the middle of the wing. Legs more
or less banded with grey and In'ow^n ; front femora with three triangular elevations below
and one about the middle, above ; front tibiae with two raised crests above, and first
joint of front tarsi laminated ; the first and fifth joints (without the claws) are of about
equal length, and longer than joints 2-4 together. Antennae a little longer than the front
femora. Middle femora with large triangular elevations near the base, one pair below,
and a single one, just beyond it, above ; before the extremity is a pair of smaller teeth on
the carinse beneath. Middle libiae with two crests above; first joint of middle tarsi as
long as the three following. Hind femora curved, toothed beneath at the extremity,
and very slightly so above ; hind tibiae with from two to four triangular teeth above,
and sometimes a small one towards the base below ; first joint of hind tarsi rather longer
than the three following together. •
Dbnensions.
Long, corporis 215 millim.
„ capitis 11 ,,
,, pronoti 11 ,,
„ niesonoti 3G „
„ tcgminuni 25 „
Exp. al ] 70 „
Loug. femorum anticorum 5;i „
„ ,, niedianonun 'M) ,,
„ ,, jjosticoruni iG „
Mab. Tanganyika.
This fine species is closely allied to /. Beyl, Grandidier, as figured by Brongniart, but
is rather smaller, and the wings are much larger; it is probably quite distinct. There
are two female specimens in the collection of the Museum.
PHASMID^ IN THE BRITISH :MUSEUM. 467
Since the above dcscrii)tion was written, another new species of this genus has been
received from Somali-land, obtained l)y Mr. and Mrs. Lort Phillips, after whom I have
much pleasure in naming it. Mrs. Pliillips rescued it from a tame monkey, which
caught it and was about to eat it.
IscHNOPODA Phillipsi, sp. n. (Plate XL. figs. 3, 3 a.)
Female. Grey, bead strongly tuberculate, and with a high double laminated crest
above, between the eyes. Behind the crest a narrow but well-marked groove runs back-
ward nearly to the extremity of the prothorax ; the rest of the thorax and the basal
segments of the abdomen are marked with a slight median carina. The insect is more
or less granvilated, most strongly on the head and thorax, and the prothorax is marked
witli a deep transverse groove just behind the front legs. Mesothorax with two sti^ong
spines at two-fifths of its length, opposite to each other and nearly upright ; behind the left-
hand one is a smaller tubercle. Abdomen with sei^ments i-7 witli slight crests on each
side before the extremity, those on the 5th segment largest ; tegmina grey, moderately
long, with a rather pointed pyramidal elevation near the base ; costal area of wings grey,
with a black band near the base, and a slight elevation towards the costa before the
middle ; wings about half as long as broad, black, with yellowish-hyaline spots, running
from the costa in irregular rows, fading away beyond the middle, at least on the outer
half of the wings, right front femora with three laminations ahove, the terminal one
largest, and another beyond tlie middle in front ; left with only the upper terminal
one slightly marked, and the front one reduced to a spine ; right front tibise with
two strong triangular laminse on the front edge ; left with 3 smaller ones, the second
double ; first joint of tarsi about as long as the remainder, and crested for its whole
length ; middle femora grey, banded with brown, and with foliaceous elevations
towards the base and extremity beneath, and two before the middle, above ; tibite with
two foliaceous crests above, one towards the base, the other beyond the middle ;
hind femora with a triangular elevation towards the extremity beneath, and tibiae with
three or four above.
The metathorax and median segment are unusually well separated in this species.
Dimensions.
Long, corporis 185 millim.
„ capitis 8 „
,, pi'onoti 10 „
„ mesonoti 30 „
,, metanoti 9 „
„ segmenti mediani 17 „
„ tegminum "23 ,,
Exp. al 114 „
Long, femorum anticorum 52 „
„ ,, medianorum -41 „
,, ,, posticorum 43 „
Hub. Somali-land.
468 ME. W. P. KIEBY ON NEW OR RARE
Closely allied to I. hreritarsis, Stul, but in that species the spines on the mesothorax
are oblique, and not parallel; the wings are shorter and the vitreous spots less numerous,
&c., &c.
Bactkododema, Stal.
Bactrododema, Stal, CEfv. Vet.-Akad. Furh. xv. p. 308 (1858) ; Bihang Svensk. Akad. ii. (17) p. U
(1875), iii. (14) p. 12 (1878) ; Recens. Orth. iii. p. 32 (1875).
The type of this genus is B. tiarata, Stal, from Damara-land. The British Museum
possesses two females from the Transvaal, which agree with Stal's description, except
that he does not mention the spines on the mesothorax, of which there is a large central
pair, and, in one specimen, a shorter pair between these and the front of the mesothorax.
From Ischno2)oda the genus differs in its much shorter, broader, and more lacerated
cephalic crests, and in the fasciculated crests which terminate several of the middle
segments of the abdomen, which, in Ischnopoda, have only a single small leaflet on each
side.
Cyphocrania cestuans, Westwood, and Bactrododema millaris and B. Welwitscid,
Bolivar, may be referred provisionally to Bactrododema ; but here the cephalic crests
are still further reduced, almost to spines. On tlie fifth segment of the abdomen in two
specimens of this section before me is a terminal raised crest.
Enetia spinosissima.
Enetia spinosissima, Kirb. Ann. Nat. Hist. (5) viii. p. 151 (1891).
Sab. Madagascar.
This fine insect is evidently allied to Achriopiera fallaa;, Coq. (Ann. Soc. Ent. Erance,-
(4) i. p. 495, pi. 9. fig. 1, 1860) ; but can hardly be the female of that species, or even
congeneric. Both genera, however, belong to the Falophince rather than to the
Acropihyllma;, though their short spiny legs, and the long operculum of Enetia ally
them to the latter subfamily.
ACROPHYLLIN^.
Vasilissa, gen. nov.
Male slender, winged ; female (perhaps immature) with tegmina only ; front legs
much longer and slenderer than the others ; first joint of their tarsi as long or longer
than all the rest together ; four hinder legs much shorter, of about equal length ; the
femora and tibiae armed with shoi't sj)ines ; the basal joint of the tarsi as long or longer
than the three following joints, which successively diminish in length; styles of the male
shorter than the last segment; of the female about two-thirds as long as the last segment,
slender, pointed ; operculum very long, j)ointed at the extremity.
This genus appears to be allied to Biura, Gray.
PHASMID.E IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. 469
Vasilissa Walkeki, s}). n.
Male. Pale ochreous, perhaps green during life, especially the tegmina ; antennae 24-
jointed, scape oblong, about twice as long as broad, the second joint annular, tlie fourth
scarcely longer than broad, the third, fifth, and sixth about twice as long as broad, but
increasing in length slightly and progressively; the following joints linear, first increasing
and then decreasing in length, the sixth terminal ones much shorter, and therefore
comparatively thicker .than the others ; terminal joint pointed. Head and prothorax of
about equal length ; mesothorax nearly four times as long as the prothorax ; four hind
femora with three rows of short black spines below, and an incomplete row of from 2
to 0 placed widely apart on the basal half of the middle line above ; four hinder tibiae set
with short hair, and furnished Avith one row of short black spines beneath. Tegmina
and costal area of wings probably green in life. Wings rather short, subhyaline, with
two round brown spots on each of the cross-nervures.
Female (described from an immature specimen in which the wings are not developed)
similar, bvit much stouter ; the spines on the legs are less numerous, especially on the
upper surface of the femora, where they are reduced to two. The antennae are much
shorter than in the male, the longest joint being the 11th, and the length of the others
rapidly decreasing towards the base and tip. In the female the hinder lobe of the
median segment is pointed, and almost as long as the segment itself ; in the male it is
rather more than half as long, and sends off a ridge which extends to the front of the
median segment.
Sab. Queen's Islet, N.W. Austraha.
.Collected by Mr. J. J. Walker, R.N.
Dimensions.
6. ?.
miUim. millim.
Long, corporis 85 135
„ capitis 4 7
Lat. „ 3 4
Long, antennarum 27 19
„ pronoti 3 5
„ mesonoti 14 25
,, metanoti, cum segmento mediauo . . 12 16
,, segment! mediani 7 9
„ femorum anticorum 25 32
„ medianorum 18 21
,, posticonim
00 22
„ tibiarum anticarum 25 36
„ „ medianarum 15 20
„ operculi . — 13
470 ME. W. F. KIEBY ON NEW OE EAEE
Xenomaches, gen. nov.
Male. Antennae extending' a little bej^ond the front femora, 2i-jointed ; scape and
3rd joint about twice as long as broad, 2nd and 4th joints hardly longer than broad,
the rest gradually increasing in length to the 15th, the middle joints being long
and cylindrical ; the IGth is shorter than the 15th, but the 17th is nearly as long ;
the next five gradually shorten; the 23rd is again longer, and the terminal joint
longer still. The head is long, not narrowed behind, convex above. The prothorax,
mesothorax, and sides of the nietathorax ai-e set with long conical spines ; the front
femora are armed with a double row of strong spines beneath, the middle femora
only witli one or two towards the extremity, and the hind femora with a row
on the central ridge, but only one or two at the extremity of the lower lateral
ridges. Hinder legs rather sbort and stout ; front legs long ; first joint of tarsi nearly
as long as the remainder ; in the other pairs it is much shorter. Pulvilli very
large. The mesothoi-ax is nearly three times as long as the prothorax, and slightly
widened behind ; the median segment is nearly twice as long as the metanotum.
The abdomen is cylindrical, the .segments are longer than broad, and the middle ones
much thickened ; it then tapers rapidly to the extremity, and the cerci are very long,
slender, and pointed. The tegmina and Aviugs are rudimentary in the specimens
before me.
This genus is allied to Bhaphidenis, from which its much stouter build, shorter
antennae, and rudimentary organs of flight will easily distinguish it. The types of
Hhaphiderus inhabit the Mauritius. The new genus Xenomaches is founded on the
following species from Rodriguez : —
Xenomaches incommodus.
Bacillus incommodus, Batler, Ann. Nat. Hist. (4) xvii. p. 410 (1878) ; Phil. Trans, clxviii. p. 148,-
pl. liv. figs. 4, 4 a-c (1876).
As Dr. Butler has already described and figured this insect, it will not require further
notice here.
Megacrania phelaus.
Platycrania 'phelaus, Westwood, Cat. Phasm. p. 113. n. .288, pi. xxvii. fig. 5 (1859).
The original type of this species (a female from Fiji) is in the British Museum. Three
more specimens of what appear to be the same species, from the Solomon Islands, have
lately been added. They are less discoloured than the type ; the head, legs, and thorax
are green, and the abdomen light mahogany-brown, with irregular longitudinal
yellowish-grey markings, and shading into darker brown towards the ends of the
segments. The male differs little from the female, except in being more slender, and in-
the greater expanse of the wings (nearly 4 inches).
PHASMID^ IX THE BlilTlSH MUSEUM. 471
Megacrania Batesii, sp. U.
Platycrania alpheus, var., Bates, Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. xxv. p. 347 (1865).
The type of 31. alpheus, Westwood, from Ceylon, tas the thorax but slightly granulated,
the tegmina nearly round, and the hind wings very short : " tegni. lin. 7|, alar, expans.
lin. 26." But in all the specimens from the Malayan and Papuan Islands the thorax is
very strongly granulated, the elytra are more oval, and the wings are much larger. All
the specimens in the British Museum are females : they are from the Solomon Islands,
Aru, and Kei Dulan. The Philippine specimens, one of which is immature and the other
has damaged wings, probably belong to this species. Bates mentions specimens from
Goram, Gilolo, and New Guinea, and describes a supposed male from Amboina. The
dimensions of the tegmina and Avings (on the same scale as Prof. Westwood's measure-
ments) are as follows in the Solomon Island specimen, which is a very tine one, measuring
upwards of 5 inches in length : — Lmgth of tegmina, 8 lines ; expanse of wings, 2 in.
101 lines.
Are,hid-5;us Stali, sp. n.
Hale. Slender. Head black, with a large reddish spot in front of the vertex,
extending from before the autennoe (the two basal joints of which are likewise reddish)
to one-third of the distance between tlie eyes and the occiput ; tliis patch is W-shaped
behind. Prothorax and metathorax black or deep chocolate-brown, with a broad rufo-
testaceous stripe on each side of the upper surface ; the space between is dotted with the
same colour. Abdomen luteous, brown aljove, except on the last four segments ; the last
three, however, have an irregular reddish stripe in tlie middle line above, and the cerci
are red, lined with yellow on the sides. Tegmina and wings blackish, with yellow costa
and nervnres. Wings reaching nearly to the end of the sixth segment. Coxae black,
lined or spotted with yellow ; femora very slightly denticulated before the extremity.
Female rather stout, yellowish green, head with a broad black band on the sides,
expanding in front of the eyes, and extending, varied with yellow, over the upper part of
the face ; coxse striped with black below, and front coxae also above; legs pubescent,
reddish, spotted Avith yellow ; middle femora towards the base, and hind femora,
very finely denticulated ; tegmina and wings brown or reddish brown, with the costal
area and the nervures brown. Wings short, only just passing the fourth segment
of the abdomen ; abdomen wide in the middle, and then tapering ; the segments of
nearly equal length, except the last three, of which the middle one is nearly twice
as long as the other two, which are much shorter than the preceding segments of the
abdomen.
Dimensions. ^ j _
millim. millim.
Long, corporis 60 86
„ capitis 5 10
„ pronoti 3 5
„ mesonoti 10 16
„ femorum anticorum .2-i 30
„ „ medianoruui \'Z 13
„ „ posticorum 15 20
SECOND SEELES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 63
472 ME. \V. F. KIEBT ON NEW OE EAEE
Hab. Albay, N.E. Luzon [Whitehead Expedition).
Seems to be intermediate between A. paUmbrus, Westw., and A. nigricornis, StSl.
A species wbich belongs to tbis genus, but wbicb. has not yet been referred to it, is
Phasma rosea, Stoll.
Ctenomorpha albopuxctattjm, sp. n.
Male. Greenish brown, probably green during life; head with 7 fine longitudinal lines
behind, 5 ferruginous, and the outermost but one on each side grey. Mesothoras with
6 or 7 sharj) black spines, irregularly paired, and one or two smaller ones ; front legs
much longer than the others, the femora very finely denticulated above and below ; four
hind femora with three rows of well-marked spines on the lower surface. Tegmina, and
costal area of wings greenish grey, finely reticulated with yellow ; tegmina with a black
spot on the hump, and a very conspicuous round whitish spot towards the inner margin.
Costal area of wings Avith a short black basal streak; the rest subhyaline, with brown
spots on the nervures. Cerci short, oval, compressed. Costa of tegmina and wings
with an ivory-white stripe.
Dimensions.
millim.
Long, corporis 83-87
,, tegniinum 8-12
Exp. al 89
Hab. Queensland.
I suspect that Dinra briareus, Gray, is the female of this species, in which case the
name briareus must be retained for it.
Hetekopterygin^.
Brunner calls this subfamily Cladomorphidce, owing to Stal having incorrectly used the
name Cladomorphus, Gray, in a different sense to Serville.
Heteroptertx atjstralis, sp. n.
Male. Dark brown, striped with testaceous on the head, prothorax, and mesothorax
before the wings. Head with 12 spines ; two rows of four very long spines towards the
back; two shorter spines in front of these, nearly in a line with the outer ones ; and two
very short ones close together in the median line, beyond the level of the three in front.
Prothorax bordered all round, the central part divided equally into two, of which the front
lobe bears two very long sharp spines, and the hind one only a few tubercles ; the lateral
borders have three spines, one at the angle in front, another a little within the hind border ;
there is also a short one on the pleura lower down. Mesothorax with several longitudinal
rows of very large spines ; the central series consists of a pair in front, a pair in the
middle, and a cluster of four between the bases of the tegmina. On the lateral borders of
the central ridge is a strong spine in front, and three or four tubercles behind ; on the
PHASMID.E IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. 473
pleura, and on the outer side of the mesopectus, are rows of three large spines on each'
besides numerous tubercles. On the central line of the meso- and metapectus is a well-
marked carina, attenuated in front, and on the metapectus are four strong spines on each
side, besides smaller ones in the middle. The tegmina have a sliort spine at the base ;
the base is black, except along the costa ; the outer half is testaceous. There is a strong
ridge over the black portion ; the testaceous portion is partly reticulated with black.
On the metapleura is a very strong spine below the middle of the wings, a shorter one
more in front, and several strong ones along the lateral ridge. Beyond the wings, which,
so far as can be seen, are f usco-hyaline, with reddish nervules, are two strong spines in
the middle, on each of the two following segments, besides numerous small ones. The
lateral ridges are also thickly spined. The extremity of the abdomen (the last four
segments) is much enlarged in the middle. There are four strong spines, gradually
diminishing, besides smaller ones on most of the segments of the abdomen ; the last four
segments being almost destitute of spines, or even tubercles both above and below. Tlie
coxsB, femora, and tibia? are strongly spined on nearly all the carina? and on the fore hinder
legs, on the front legs more sparingly. On the hinder ones, numerous small teeth fill up
the interspaces between the others, which are often rather wide apart.
The female is a dark brown insect, spined nearly as in the male, but larger and more
bulky. It differs from that of S. Dehaanii, Westw., by its much larger tegmina, the
larger and more regular series of spines on the sides of the abdomen, and the much
stronger spmes on the legs, &c.
Dimensions.
J. ?.
millim. raillim.
Long, corporis 85 104
„ capitis 7 9
,, pronoti 8 11
„ mesonoti ]4 17
,, tegminum 16 22
„ femorum anticorum 21 22
„ „ mediauorum 17 23
„ „ posticorutn 25 35
Jffab. Australia (locality not specified).
PsEUDOPHASMIN^.
Genus Pseudophasma.
Phasma, St.-Farg. & Serv. (nee Illiger), Encycl. Method., Ent. x. p. 100 (1828).
The type of Phasma, Illiger, was fixed by Latreille as Mantis rossia, Fabricius, which
was subsequently taken as the type of Bacillus, St.-Farg. & Serv. They took Mantis
necyduloides, Linn., as the type of Phasma, and have been followed in this by recent
474 ME. W. F. KIRBT ON NEW OE KAEE
authors ; but now that the error has been discovered, the apterous genus Bacillus (an
inconvenient name at best) sinks as a synonym of Fhasitm; and the winged genus
Phas))ia, auct., with necydaloldes as the type, may be called Fseudophasma. This
will involve a little alteration of the subfamilies, for Brunner's BacilUdce must now
be called Phasmince, and his Phasmidce must be called FseudophasmincB.
Stratocles bogotensis, sp. n.
Male. Black. Head black above, antennge black, pubescent, face and under surface
rufous ; ocelli yellow. Two yellow lines run from the ocelli, and two more on each side,
one behind each eye, and another, broader, below each eye, all slighly converging to the
occijmt ; there is a green spot above each antenna, and a slender green line at the end of
the scape. Prothorax and mesothorax with a green stripe on the back, partly bifid in
front; the lateral ridge of the prothorax is also marked with a narrow green line. Coxae
yellow, femora testaceous, tibiiB and tarsi black, pubescent ; a broad green stripe runs
along the pectus from the front to the middle coxa?, and from the latter to the hind
coxJB, and is continued more narrowly along the abdomen ; under the wings is a narrow
yellowish-green line. Tegmina black, lined with green ; opaque portion of wing reddish
brown, lined with green towards the costa nearly to the extremity; hind wings smoky
hyaline, with a broad curved milk-white band across the middle, not extending to the
costa or inner margin. Terminal segments slightly expanded ; cerci rather long, crossed
at the extremity.
Female nearly as in the male, but larger, and with more green lines on the head,
including three meeting in front, behind the ocelli, and an additional line on each side,
meeting in front of the ocelli. The green lateral stripes on the pectus and abdomen are
much less continuous; the vipper appendages are black, and about as long as the last
segment but one. The hinder half of the abdomen is testaceous beneath, and projects
about as far beyond the abdomen as the cerci, like Avhich it is pubescent.
Dimensions.
i. ?.
millim. millim.
Long, corporis 36 46
„ capitis 2 3"5
,, pronoti 3"5 3"5
,, mesouoti 2'5 3
,, luetauoti, cum segmeoto mediauo . . 7 7'b
,, segmenti mediani I'l 3
,, femorum anticorum 13 10
„ ,, medianorum 10 10
„ „ posticorum 12 12
,, tegminum 4"5 6
Exp. al. 57 76
Not closely allied to any known species.
PHASMID^ IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM.
475
ASCHIPHASMIN.^.
Genus Presbistus.
Asc/iipasma, Brimner, Ann. Mus. Genova, xxxiii. p. 100 (1893).
In lS3i ATestAvood founded a genus Aschlphusma, and in 1835 Gray founded a genus
Ferlamorphiis. The type of the former is A. annulipes, Westwood. ; and that of Gray,
PerlamorpJms Jiieroghjphlcus, Curt. MS. P. peleus, Gray, was added as a second species,
but has no chiim to be considered the type of Pe^^lamor pirns; and as P. hieroglyphicus.
Gray, is considered to be synonymous with Asclt/'phasma anniUipes, Westw., Gray's genus
and species both fall. But Brunner, who adoj)ts Westwood's later and incorrect spelling
Asclitpasma, divides the genus as follows: —
1. Femora antica carinata et basi curvata Ascliijxisma, Westw.
I'. Femora antica subteretia, basi non curvata Perlamorpha, Serv.
As A. ani/nl/pes, Westw., the type of the genus, belongs to Pcrlamoiplia, Brunner,
which must, as we have seen, take the name of A.^chiphasma, it is necessary to rename
Asch/'pasma, Brunner, which I therefore designate Presbistus, and indicate Perlamorplius
peleus. Gray, as the type.
P H A S M I N .E.
Genus Abkachia.
Ahrachla, Kiib. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. (C) iii. p. 503 (1889).
On re-examining my A. brevicornis, the type of this genus, I find that it possesses
triangular clefts at the ends of the tibire, which, coupled with the short antennae, will
bring it at least provisionally into this subfamily. The types are from Theresopolis,
Brazil. Bacteria longimana, Saussure, from Bahia, is certainly congeneric, and is
possibly the same species.
EXPLANATION OF TEE PLATES.
Plate XXXIX.
Fig. 1. Cliondrostethus Wooilfordi, Kirb., J". (Head, fig. 1 a.
2. Ditto, ? . (Head, fig. 2 m.)
3. Bacteria Trophimus, Westw., (J. (Head, fig. 3«.) .
4. Ditto, ^ . (Head, fig. 4a.)
Page
455
463
Plate XL.
Fig. 1. Hermor/enes Hosei, Kli'b., ? . (Head, fig. 1 «.)
2. Phasgonia Evere/ti, Kirb., ? . (Terminal segments, fig. 2 a.)
3. Ischnopoda PhiUipsi, Kirb., ? . (Head, fig. 3 «.) ....
4. Promachus sordidus, Kirh. (Head, fig. 4 a.)
5. Cmdonia spinosissima, Kirb. (Terminal segments, fig. 5 «.)
457
4G1
467
463
464
SECOND SERIES.^ — ZOOLOGY, VOL. YI.
64
Kirby.
Trans. LiNiT Soc.Zool.Ser.2.Vol.VI.P1.39.
FH Michael. ad nat ael el hth
West,Ne\Tiiiai"i imp
NEW AND RARE PHASMIDjE,
Trans Linn. Soc, Zool. Ser. 2 VolVI- PI. 40.
FHMichael,aiinat dd etlitli
West.Newnian iml
P
NEW AND RARE PHASMID^
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMORANDA CONCERNING TRANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
iu 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and 6s. to Fellows ; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
wrapper) : —
When Price to the
Volume. Published. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Seeies. — Zoologt.
I. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 .
Part III. 1876 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 .
Part V. 1877 0 18 0 .
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 .
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 .
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 .
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 6 ..
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XV- 1885 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886. .... 0 3 0 .
PartXVIlI. 1888 0 2 6 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
Volun
When
Published.
Price to the
Public.
£ s. d.
Price to
Fellows.
Second Sebies. — Zoology (continued).
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0 . .
Part II. 1884 1 12 0 ..
Part III. 1885 1 10 0 . .
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0 . .
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0 . .
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0 . .
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 ..
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0 . .
Part II. 1S88 0 5 0 . .
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 . .
Part IV. 1890 0 12 0 . .
Part V. 1890 0 6 0 . .
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0 . .
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 ..
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 ..
Part IX. 1892 0 12 0 . .
Part X. 1893 1 8 0 . .
Part XI. 1894 0 2 6 . .
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 . .
Part 11. 1894 1 11 0 ..
Part III. 1894 0 10 0 . .
Part IV. 1896 1 4 0 ..
Part V. 1896 0 10 0 . .
Part VI. 1896 0 8 0 ..
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PART 7.
THE
(o'f/l
fvy
rRANSACTIONS
lyy?
OF
rii
IHE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
THE INTERNAL ANATOMY OF liDELLA.
BY
ALBERT D. MICHAEL, V.P.L.S., F.Z.S., P.R.M.S.
LONDON
PRINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOn AND FHANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BURLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, VV.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
^.
Votahor 18!)G.
[ 477 ]
VII. The Internal Anatomy of Bdella.
£y A. D. Michael, V.P.L.S., F.Z.S., F.B.3I.S.
(Plates 41-43.)
Head lOth April 1896.
Contents.
Introductory Observations.
Modes of Investigation 477
Species used 478
Position, Characters, and Subdivision of the
Bdelliuaj .... 479
Food of the Bdellinfe 480
Former Eesearches 480
The Trophi and Mouth-organs.
Maxillary Lip and Exoskeleton of Rostrum. 482
Palpi 483
Mandibles 483
Epipharynx 483
Lingua 484
The Alimentary Canal and Excretory Organ.
Pharynx 485
(Esophagus and Sucking-stomach 487
Ventriculus 489
Excretory Organ 489
The Salivary Glands.
General 492
Tubular Gland 493
Main common Duct 493
Eeniform Gland 494
Anterior Gland 494
Pericibal Gland 495
Azygous Gland 496
The Brain and Nervous System.
The Brain 497
The Nerves 499
The Eyes 503
Page
The Eeproductive System.
The Male.
General 503
Testes 504
Embedding-sacs 505
Testicular Bridge 506
Mucous Glands 507
Glandular Antechambers 508
Penial Canal 509
Azygous Accessory Gland 511
Laminated Gland 512
Air-chambers 513
External Labia 514
Spermatozoa 514
Course of the Spermatozoa to the Exterior
and Functions of Organs 515
The Female.
General 516
Ovary 516
Oviduct 517
Eeceptaculum aeminis 518
External Labia 518
The Eespiratory Organs 518
The Dermal Glands 519
The Endosternite 519
The Musculature 52i)
The External Cuticle 522
Bibliography 523
Explanation of the Plates 524
Intkoductoky Observations.
J. HIS paper contains the results of work extending over a period of more than three
years, and involving the careful dissection of several hundred specimens, besides the
preparation and study of numerous serial sections cut in all directions — i. e., sagittal, hori-
zontal, and transverse. The dissections have been made partly on sj)ecimens freshly killed ,
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 65
478 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
either with boiling water or chloroform; but a large number also have been made on
individuals hardened in alcohol and other hardening reagents : this is advantageous for
some organs, but usually in Acari I prefer the fresh specimens. The dissections have
mostly been stained on the slide with borax-carmine or picro-carmine. The sections
have been made from specimens killed with hot water, fixed with picro-sulphuric acid
or Flemming's fluid, stained on the slide with ha^matoxylin (Ehrlich's), and mounted in
balsam. I may say that Flemming's fluid appears to give somewhat the best results
when it penetrates, but that its penetrating power is so inferior to picro-sulphuric acid
in the case of Acari that a considerable number of specimens are lost when that reagent
is employed. Whereas j)icro-sulphuric acid can be relied on to penetrate such Acari as
Bdella with sufficient rapidity it is probably best to use it, although the results will
not be quite equal to really good Flemming's fluid-hardened specimens. Other
reagents which I have tried have not, I think, produced an equally satisfactory fixing
of the histological condition.
The species which I have used has been chiefly Bdella. Basteri (Johnston, 7 *),
because, through the kindness of Professor Herdman and the officers of the Biological
Station (at Port Erin, Isle of Man) of the Liverpool Marine Biological Committee, I have
received supplies of large numbers of this species at frequent intervals and at various
seasons; these have enabled me to pursue the enquiry in a manner which I could not
otherwise have done ; and I beg to tender my best thanks for the assistance. I was
anxious to obtain this species because it is, in my judgment, the best suited for research
of those that I know, being large (for a Bdella) — its total length isa bout 2-5 to 3 mm.,
and being also very strong and vigorous, with the parts well developed. I have also
used Bdella vulgaris, B. capillata (Kramer), and some others, but could not obtain them
in equal numbers or with equal certainty. Wherever in the following paper an organ
or structure is mentioned without the species of Bdella being named, it belongs to
B. Basteri.
I have adopted the name of B. Basteri for the species because there is no doubt that
it is the creature described by Johnston under that title in 1847, while it is quite
uncertain whether it is the species referred to by any earlier writer. Thus it has been
supposed that B. Basteri is the same species which is called Acariis longicornis by
LinnjEus is his ' Fauna Suecica,' but this is very doubtful. I hardly see how the opinion
is arrived at. Moreover Andrew Murray f considered that Linngeus has described a
different species under the same name in the ' Systema Naturae,' and that this latter is
the species to which the name is now generally applied.
Bdella sanguinea, Trouessart, 1894 (21), wliich that author, following Andrew
Murray, places in a subgenus Molgus (Dujardin), is, I think, a synonym ; indeed,
Trouessart himself calls attention to the probability of its being so, but was not able
to obtain Johnston's original paper. Trouessart does not describe the hairs on the
mandibles, which are important according to Kramer's tables of the genus, therefore I
* This figure, and all similar figures throughout the jjaper, refer to the list of authorities quoted (Bibliography)
page 523.
t 'Economic Entomology: Aptera' (London, 1876), p. 143.
INTEEXAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 479
should not like to speak with absolute certainty ; but the palpus of his species is similar
to that of B. Bastei'i (as I found it), and is not similar to the paljms of any other Bdella
which I know of.
Bdella tnarinu, Packard *, is probably also the same species.
. Enpalus smiguineus, Trouessartf, is also a synonym (according to the author himself).
Bdella villosa, Kramer and Neuman J, is either the same species or a very closely allied
one ; but in the figure the fifth joint of the palpus is drawn a trifle shorter than the
second, whereas in B. Basteri the second is a trifle shorter than the fifth; and the spines
at the end of the fifth joint are drawn rather longer than those at the side, whereas in
B. Basteri they are about equal in length : these, however, arc small points, and the
probability that the creatures are identical is increased by the fact that Trouessart
received some of his specimens of B. Basteri {sanguinea) from Iceland, and these had
the fifth joint of the palj)us rather shorter than, in the French specimens, so that it seems
probable that B. villosa is at most a local variety.
I think there is very little doubt that Bdella arctica, Thorell, 1871§, is the same
species, although here again the fifth joint of the palpus is said to be slightly shorter
than the second.
Bdella lapidaria, Kramer, 1881 (i 2. p. 28, Taf. 4. figs. 9, 9 «, 9 b,), and Bdella vulgaris,
var. littoralis, Mouiez, 1890 (15), arc both sea-shore species, but they ai*e not identical
with B. Basteri ; Trouessart suggests that they are probably both the same species.
I am also greatly indebted to Mr. M. J. Michael, of the Davos Platz, Switzerland, who
has cut the sections which I have used for the present study, and has otherwise
assisted me.
The Bdellinse are usually considered to be a subfamily of the Trombidiidse ; they are
a very aberrant subfamily, and are raised into a family by such acarologists as
Canestrini (3), Berlese ||, &c., who elevate the old family of the Trombidiidye iato
an order under the name of " Prostigmata '' (Kramer), Trouessart (20) considers the
Prostigmata to be a suborder, separates the Bdellinae from the Trombidiidte, but unites
them with the Eupodinaj to form a family "Bdellidie"; his subfamily " Bdellinye,"
however, contains the same two genera for which I vise the term in this paper, but it
also contains one other, Qrijptognathns (Kramer), which appears to me to be too different
to be included. The two genera which I include in the Bdellinae are Bdella (LatreiUe,
1797) and Ammonia (Koch, 1842), distinguished according to Canestrini (2. p. 181),
following Kramer's subdivision of the genus Bdella, by the long rostrum and long
mandibles with very small chelae of Bdella, compared with the shorter rostrum and
mandibles and comparatively substantial chelse of Ammonia; but distinguished according
to Bevlese (1) by the second and third joints of the palpus being more or less fused, and
by the presence of a fifth median eye and the absence of hairs between the claws in
* ' The American Naturalist,' 1S84, pp. 827, 828, iig. 2.
t Comptes lleudus de FAcad. d. Sci. 1S8S, t. cvii. jjp. 753, 755.
+ "Acariden wahrend dcr Vega-Expedition eiugesammelt," Yega-Expeditioneus Yetonskapliga Arbeteii, Bd. iii.
p. 525, Tail. 41.
§ " Om Araelinider Mu Spetsbergen och Becren-Eiland," CEfversigt K. Yet.-Akad. Forhaudlg. 187 1, Stockholm,
p. 698.
li "Acarorum systematis Specimen,'" Boll. Soc. Entom. Ital. 1885, pp. 121-125.
65*
480 ME. A. D. MICHAEL OX THE
Ammonia, compared with the five distinct palpal joints, foiir eyes, and hairy claws
pulvilli) of Bclella.
The anatomy in this paper is of the genus Bdella only ; I have not had the opportunity
of studying that of Ammonia.
The Bdellinse are sharply distinguished from all other Acari by their antenniform, non-
raptorial palpi, ending in hairs.
Karpelles (8), working upon Bdella arenaria, Kramer, which is supposed to he
identical vdth Bdella vulgaris ^Hermann), states that the Bdellinse are exclusively
(" ausschliesslich ") vegetable-feeders, and that the remains of mosses are found in their
alimentary canal ; he also states that certain black matter often found in their canal is
earth. I regret to say that I entirely disagree with him ; in my opinion all Bdellinse
which I have studied have been predatory, living entirely by sucking the juices
of other small creatures, principally Thysanuridae, which they capture with their
mandibles.
Bdella Basteri lives in chinks in the rocks of the sea-coast, and emerges when the
tide goes down ; often at those times it is abundant upon the decaying seaweed, feeding
on the Thysanurida? which swarm there. Trouessart, in his classification of the
Acarina (20), says that the Bdellinse are " terrestrial Acari feeding upon living prey " ;
and this eminent acarologist informed me by letter that he found that they lived greatly
upon Thysanuridse, an opinion which he formed quite independently of my own, and
mthout knowing that I took the same view ; and he states that Poduridse are the food
of B. Basteri {sangidnea) in his paper on that species (21. p. 125). It may also be
remembered that the name " Bdella " is a pure Greek word, signifying a leech, so that
it is tolerably evident what Latreille's opinion was. Pinally, the trophi, and indeed the
alimentary canal also, appear to me to be characteristic of a predatory animal living by
suction and not of a vegetable-feeder. Karpelles himself says that the matter j)assed by
the anus (as to which organ see below, p. 490) is liquid, and that he never found
excrement balls, which scarcely seems quite consonant with his view that the vascular
bundles of plants are found in the canal.
The internal anatomy of Bdella may practically be considered an almost, if not wholly,
new subject. The external anatomy and the trophi are described by Kramer (11);
his descriptions, although not very full, are in my ojiinion almost always correct, so far
as they go : therefore in this paper T have not referred to the external anatomy, except
very shortly in one or two instances, where it seemed necessary in order not to break the
continuity of study of organs which terminate at the exterior of the creature.
The only paper which I am aware of that touches on the internal anatomy of Bdella
is that by Karpelles (now Karell) before referred to (8). It is very slight indeed*.
In the first place, Karpelles did not find the male, and therefore does not say anything
about the male genital organs ; but it happens that it is in this set of organs that the
greater part of the most sti'iking variations which distinguish the internal anatomy of
Bdella from that of all other Acari which I know of exist. In the next place, unless
Bdella arenaria (if really different from B. vulgaris) be very different from every Bdella
* The whole nervous system and sense-organs occupy only about 20 lines, the respiratory organs about 4 lines, &c.
INTEEXAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 481
which I have examined, I regret to say that I find myself unable to agree with Karpelles
as to several of the descriptions which he gives: tliese divergences of opinion will
be found detailed under the headings of the various organs as I come to them ; but
there is one matter which it is best to deal with here, as no such organ as that described
and flgvired by Karpelles will be found in my description. Karpelles shows an elaborate
endoskeleton in the abdomen, composed of numerous large and strong chitinous rings
and quadrangular frames pressed against or joined to each other, forming a very strong
and conspicuous apparatus. I can only say that I have dissected and sectioned and
carefully examined several hundred Bdclhe of various species and both sexes and of
various ages, but I never saw a trace of such an organ, nor have I ever found anything
of the kind in any Acarid ; but I have frequently seen, both in Bdella and other families,
in sections of the adult female the exact appearance which Karpelles figures and
describes; but in every case within my experience it has arisen in the following
manner:— When the eggs are ripe in the body of the female they are often very large,
and are in many genera, Bdella amongst others, provided with a strongly chitinized
chorion : in preparing specimens for section-cixtting it is extremely difficult to get the
paraffin or other embedding material to penetrate this chorion, it generally will not do
so ; the chorion, however, although chitinized, is not so extremely brittle as, for instance,
the exoskeleton of the Oribatidaj, and the razor cues it, forming rings and square frames
of chitin, whicl), as the abdomen in females with mature eggs is generally full of them,
press against each other and are fixed in the paraffin ; but the yolk and other contents of
the eggs, not being reached by the paraffin and therefore not being fixed, drop out unless
special precautions are taken to prevent it, when the precise appearance of Karpelles'
figure arises : but such special precautions can l)e taken, and if they be the yolk-
spherules are found filling the ring ; moreover, if the creature is dissected instead
of sectioned the eggs are, of course, found whole. I hardly like to suggest that
Karpelles may possibly have fallen into this error ; but the mistake is really an easy one
to make in a case like his : where no male has been found to act as a check it is the
more likely to have occiun-ed, so the paper referred to is, as far as I know, Karpelles'
first anatomical paper upon the Acarina, and therefore he may not have experienced
this difficulty before. If this be not the explanation, I am wholly unable to account for
his figure and description of this supposed endoskeleton.
One other publication must be noticed as giving some little information regarding the
internal anatomy of Bdella. In Berlese's great work on the Italian Acari (r), which
is still publishing in fasciculi, the author, when he has finished "a group, writes an
introduction in which he gives type-plates of the respective families or subfamilies. In
his introduction to his order Prostigmata (Trombidiidte), Professor Berlese gives two
drawings of the rostrum and one or two adjoining parts of Bdella longirostris ; these
appear to be drawn chiefly from sections, althougli it is not so stated ; he does not say a
word about the internal anatomy in his letterpress, but he provides an explanation of
the plates, which gives the names of such internal parts as he draws.
Although the above are aU the writings wliich I know of on the internal anatomy of
Bdella, yet as the BdelliniB are part of the great group of Acari which includes the
TrombidiidEE, Hydrachuidte, &c., the various works which have beeu published on the
482 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
internal anatomy of other memhers of that group must also he kept in view ; they will
he found constantly referred to helow, and it will he seen that although Bdella differs
widely from these types, it resemhles them more than it resemhles any other Acari.
The principal works on the internal anatomy of these allied creatures ai-e those hy
Croneherg (4, 5), Henkin (6), Pagenstecher (17), Schauh (18), and myself (14)-
The Trophi and Mouth-okgans.
(Eigs. 1, 2, 4., 29, 30, 31, 32.)
Maxillary Lip and Exoskeleton of Bostrimi. — The extremely elongated rostrum
of Bdella consists of a long, chitinous maxillary lip (fig. 29), very conca^-e iijjward,
i. e., it is a half-tuhe with its convex side downward ; toward its proximal end it swells
out greatly, hoth laterally and helow^ so as to form a hull) — or perhaps it would he more
correct to say a half-hulh, the similar and superposed swelling-out of the mandibles
forming the other half-hulh. The edges of this lij), except near the anterior end, curl over
inward ; the portion so turning inward is flat, forming a partial roof to the rostrum ;
above the bnlhoiis p)ortion of the lip these two flat pieces, one from each side, fuse, forming
a perfect roof to that part of the rostrum (fig. 4) ; at its posterior edge this roof is
strengthened hy a curved bar of thicker chitin, which in Trombkliiim Heukiu calls the
" Chitiuhriicke " ; and about one-fourth of the distance from the bar towards the anterior
end there is a longish spinelying flat upon and articulated near the edge of the roof.
The anterior end of the maxillary lip is truncated abruptly ; its edge being almost a
semi-circle convex downward, or even with the sides pressed together a little ; but the
half-moon-shaped space thus left does not remain open to the exterior. Kramer and
Karpelles following him draw the anterior edge of the lip as armed with a sei'ies of
spines, w'hich are a continuation of the edge of the lip itself (see Ki-amer's fig. 5, c ;
Karpelles' fig. 2), and Kramer suggests from this supposed formation that the lip is a
piercing-organ. I do not find the arrangement so simple as this in those species which
I. have examined : taking B. Basterl as an example, I find that inside the edge on each
side, partly within the chitinous lip and partly protruding beyond it, is a very fine and
extremely transj)arent membranous flap (fig. 32, iiif) ; on the inner side of this flap is a
series of strong hairs or fine spines, all curved inward, especially near their tips.
Fig. 32 shows the maxillary lip flatteaed out so as to exhibit these flaps ; but when it is
in its natiu-al shape the curvature causes the flaps to stand nearly on edge, and they
slope slightly inward so as to touch at their anterior edges, and the curved ends of the
hairs cross, thus closing the mouth-opening and excluding dust, &c. (fig. 29), w^hen the
lingua is not protruded ; when it is, it forces these flexible flaps apart. This apjiaratus
is much more correctly drawn by Berlese (i), see his figs. 3, 4 It, and ^ g ; he calls it
sometimes "galea," sometimes "lacinia"; it also has considerable resemblance to
Henkin's " reusenformiger Apparat der Mundoffnung " in Trombidimn.
From near the edge of the chitinous maxillary lip, on its outer (under) side, spring two
chitinous apophyses on each side of the lip ; I'rom each apophysis a strong, curved, tactile
hair (tigs. 29, 32, thl) springs, which projects beyond the edge of the membranous flap.
INTERNAL ANAT03IY OF BDELLA. 483
Palpi. — To the hind corners of the maxillary lip the well-known " antenniform palpi "
of JBclella (fig. 4, P) are jointed, not directly to the hard cliitin of the lip, but by means
of the intervention of some flexible cuticle, which doubtless gives greater freedom of
motion to these highly mobile organs. The palpi of Bdella differ from the corre-
sponding parts in other Acarina, both in their great length and size, and in the position
in which they are carried. The length is almost equal to that of the front legs in most
species ; and the pi'oportionate length of the joints and the arrangement of the hairs or
spines upon them form good and much-utilized specific distinctions. The three proximal
joints are usually carried pointing almost perpendicularly upward, while the two
terminal joints point almost horizontally forward or a little downward.
The Mandibles (figs. 30 md and 31) lie close together upon the roof of the rostrum ; they
differ from those of all other Acari, except the Ixodidte and a few isolated species such
as Nicoletiella, (Zabidophorus, Kramer), in not being enclosed within the chitinous case
of the rostrum, but being quite free and resting on the toji of it ; they are two-jointed
chelate organs, the movable joint being placed ventrally, as is usual amongst Acarina.
The chelae are extremely small and fine in most species ; and, in such as I have dealt
with, simple without teeth. The mandibles are not eaj)able of being retracted into the
body, as are those of the Gamasidfe and others ; indeed, the bulbous form of their proximal
ends would prevent this ; but the whole rostrum can to some slight extent be with-
drawn into the camerostrum. The inner and lower sides of the mandibles are
almost flat ; the outer and upper sides curved — in fact one continuous curve forms
the two. The shape of the mandibles and distribution of the hairs ujdou them are relied
on for specific distinctions, and indeed the form is considered a generic distinction by
some a^^thors.
Between the two mandibles is a thin low jmrtition (fig. 30, ^;m) like a blade on edge ;
this is the " tastcrformiges Organ " of Karpelles : I do not, however, see any evidence
of its being of a palpus-like or tactile nature ; I am rather inclined to regard it as a
simple partition which separates and guides the mandibles, and prevents their rubbing
against each other ; it is not attached to the mandibles.
The Epipharynx is an organ of considerable importance and complexity, which appears
to have been entirely overlooked by Kramer, Berlese, and Karpelles. It springs from
the anterior edge of the propharyngeal plate (figs. 1, 2, p)p), oi") rather, by means of a
fold from the membranous sac which encloses the pharyngeal muscles a trifle above the
propharyngeal plate ; thiis it projects into the mouth-cavity and overhangs the opening
of the pharynx. It consists in B. Basferi of a very elongated, almost triangular piece
which ends anteriorly in an extremely fine point; it is about "25 mm. long, and
abou.t "07 mm. wide at the base. This central triangle is stiff and lancet-like; it is
thickest in the median line, where there is a slight tendency to a longitudinal ridge in
the posterior part of the organ ; to this ridge it slopes uji gently from the sides, but the
median thickening is not great or conspicuous. The whole of the triangle, except its
anterior end, is semiopaque, and is thickly and irregularly dotted with red pigment ;
the pointed anterior end is of clear hard chitin. The ducts (fig. 2, dp) from the pedcibal
salivary gland discharge on the underside of this triangle close to the hind angles
48'4 • ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
Along eiich lateral side of tlae triangle runs a border of clear, hyaline, flexible
membrane, whicli falls slightly downward, so that the whole organ forms an inverted
trough.
From the lowest level of the anterior edge of the propharyngeal plate springs a half
moon-shaped membrane (figs. ] , 2, km), which must be regarded as forming part of the
epipharynx, although it is lower in level than the triangle ; it is thin, transparent, and
highly tiexible ; its upper surface is armed with a large number of spines ; the flexibility
causes this organ to hang downward, and thus the upper surface becomes the anterior
surface, and the spines at its edge, which are about eleven in number, come in front of
the opening of the pharynx, and ai^jmrently serve to stop all solid particles from
entering ; such particles may often be seen collected in numbers on the spines.
The Lingua (figs. 2, 4, li) is develojoed in a very special manner in Bdella ; it springs
from near the lower edge of the pharyngeal opening, just as the epipharynx springs
from its upper edge. Where it starts from the opening it is a flat tongue with the edges
only slightly curled upward ; this curling upward very shortly increases, so that the two
edges meet and fuse, thus forming a membranous tube, which is the nature of the lingua
for the greater part of its length ; it is extensile, and can be extruded a considerable
distance beyond the mouth-oiiening (fig. i), or it can be wholly withdraw^n into the
mouth by invagination, being drawn inward like the finger of a glove. It is slightly
enlarged at the distal end, and is capable of motion and flexion in every direction ; it is
composed of thick membrane and provided with delicate muscles.
From each side of the lingua, near where it springs from the oesophagus, a fine
tendinous " tie " (fig. 2, tt) runs upw'ard to tlie base of the epipharynx, and nearly between
these two ties a transverse line of minute tooth-like, but not pointed, projections runs
across the base of the lingua ; probably the teeth at the edge of the semilunar membrane
of the epipharynx meet these projections.
This lingua is tJie organ through which the juices of the victims are sucked, the
pharynx being the pumping-organ ; in specimens killed w bile feeding, or shortly after,
the tubular lingua is often found full of the same food-material as that in the pharynx,
sucking-stomach, and oesophagus.
Kramer (ii) saw and has figured the lingua extended (his fig. 5, e); he figures and
describes two appendages above its base Avhich he calls " wing-shaped," and supposes to
be cuticular, but which I have not ever seen. Karpelles also has figiu-ed the lingua
ihis fio'S. 2, 4, 7, 8, ce), but he calls it tiie " oesophagus " ; it cannot be considered as part
of the oesophagus, because it is anterior to the pharynx and is situated in the mouth-
cavity, lying, w^hen retracted, within the trough of the maxillary lip.
The Alimentary Canal and Excretory Organ.
(Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 34, 41, 42, 43.)
In the whole of the " Trombidnim " group of Acarina, and also in the Gamasidae and
some other families, it is impossible to treat these as separate sets of organs, they are so
closelv connected as to form one and must be dealt with together.
INTERNAL ANATOMY 01' BUELLA. 485
The mouth-parts have ah'eady been described.
The Pharynx is of the usual Acarine type, but exhibits a lew special features; it is
well, ill the first place, shortly to state what that type is. The pharynx is the great
sucking-organ in all Acari, and in most of those which live by suction, as practically all
jjredatory Acari do, but especially in the Trombidium-groui^, the pharynx consists of two
chitinous half-tubes, like gutter-pipes, concave upward, the upper fitting closely upon
find within the lower. The lower is really the continuation of the maxillary lip and
forms the fioor of the pharynx : the upper is the roof of the pharynx ; it is by the
movements of this roof that suction is ett'ected. The following is the mechanism : bands
of perpendicular muscle arise from the underside of the roof of the rostrum and are
inserted on the upperside of the roof of the pharynx, which is raised when they
contract : the food rushes into the partial vacuum thus created ; the anterior end is
closed by a valve which prevents the food returning to the mouth. Between each band
of perpendicular muscles there is a transverse muscle, usually round, running straio"ht
across the upper tube I'rom one edge to the other ; when these mtiscles contract the
edges are drawn together and the central parts of the vq^per half-tube are driven down
upon the lower one, thus forcing the food on into the oesophagus. Even such Acari as
can consume solid food, as the Tyroglyphida? and the Oribatidae, usually have the
pharynx constructed upon some modification of tliis plan — which, however, is somew hat
varied in the case of the Gamasidie and others, but the modifications are more of detail,
in the form of the lumen and the conseqttent arrangement of the muscles, than of general
principle. In most Acari the muscle-bands are numerous, and the " jierpendicular " ones
or levatores are almost perpendicular.
In Bdella the first modification of the general arrangement which is observed is that
the roof of the pharynx is only slightly chitinized, and is indeed almost membranous ;
the result of this is that instead of tlie whole roof rising in response to the action of the
perpendicular muscles, each muscle only raises the part into which it is inserted ; the
muscles apparently contract in succession from before backward : thus an undulatorv
motion is caused, Avhich swiftly carries the food back to the oesoj^hagus ; the anterior
perpendicular muscles relaxing, while those posterior to them are contracting, allow the
anterior part of the roof of the pharynx to descend ujion the floor, forming the valve,
Avhich is differently constructed in other allied families.
The next variation from the tisual type is that, instead of the numerous bands of
small muscles commonly fotmd in the pharynx of Acarina, Bdella possesses only a few
bauds, which are necessarily larger. In Bdella Basteri there are six ^'dk^% of perpen-
dicular muscles and six transverse muscle-bands, all considerably larger than in most
iamilies.
I have preserved the name of perpendicular nuiscles for the '■'levator tectl pharrjngls"
or " dlstensor jihari/nffis " muscles (figs. 2, 3, ml^j) because the name has been so frequently
used in relation to other families ; but the next variation from the usual type which has to
be noticed is that in Bdella, doubtless as the result of the extreme length of the rostrum
combined with Ihe small number of pharyngeal muscles, the levator muscles are not
really perpendicular : they all arise from the hinder and stronger part of the roof of the
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI 66
486 MK. A. i). MICHAEL OX THE
rostrum ; the posterior pair are an approach to tlie perpendicular aud are sliort ; those
that are inserted further forward become successively longer and longer and more and
more inclined forward, so that the anterior pair are quite long muscles and almost
horizontal. All these muscles are inserted into the roof of the pharynx, either directly
or each by means of a single tendon; not by numerous short tendons such as attach
the corresponding muscles in Thyas petrophilus.
The transverse muscles also vary consideral^ly from the usual type ; indeed it is
evident that some modification would be rendered necessary by the mere fact of the roof
of the pharynx being membranous, and consequently very flexible, instead of chitinous
and only slightly so. The result of this would be that if the transverse (or occlusor)
muscles only approximated the lateral edges of the roof or upj)er half-tube, this action
would simply crumple it, and would not drive the central part down upon the lower
half-tube or floor. This difficulty is obviated by the following arrangement in Bdella :
the transverse bands are not round in section, but are broad flat bands ; each band is
arched ; the posterior bands are arched upward, while one of the anterior, which is
situated where the oesophagus turns sharply downward, is arched forward and seems on
edge in the body. Beneath the anterior band there is a thickened plate, or mass, of
tendinous material (figs. 1, 2, 5, 34, pp) in the roof of the pharynx, which doubtless
enables the muscle to force it doAvn more effectually. Tlie plate is just where the
pharynx merges into the mouth, and it is hard to say whether it is to be considered as
wholly a part of the pharynx or wholly or 2:)artly a portion of the mouth ; I incline to
the former view. I will, in order to distinguish it, call it the " propharyngeal plate."
The plate itself is not a mere straight plate of even thickness ; it consists of two portions —
a central plate of thick tendinous material, and a thinner border. The thick central
plate is much narrower than the base of the epipharynx, and is considerably wider
posteriorly than anteriorly ; its sides have a slightly concave outline when seen from
above or below ; its thickness vai'ies in different parts, its ventral surface, adjoining the
pharynx, being almost straight, while its dorsal surface curves rapidly upward ; thus the
thickest part of the plate is almost at its posterior end ; this end is sharply truncated
and has a perpendicular wall. Immediately behind this wall the second transverse band
of pharyngeal muscles (constrictors) is placed nearly on edge, instead of having its broad
side downward like the other muscles of the same series ; like them it is arched but has
its concavity forward, thus when it contracts it must force the propharyngeal plate and
epipharynx somewhat forward. One fasciculus of distensor (levator) muscles (fig. 5)
on each side of the median line is inserted by a very short tendon into the supero-
posterior angle of this thick central part of the propharyngeal plate, and another pair on
its dorsal surface about a quarter of its length behind the anterior end. The posterior
of these tendons may be traced some distance in the substance of the plate. The border
is of tissue similar to the central portion, but much thinnei* ; it runs along the sides and
rear, but not along the front, where the propliaryngeal plate joins the epipharynx ; it
makes the whole plate form an oblong slightly wider than the epipharynx ; the border
slopes slightly downward, and the portions of it at the sides of the central plate have a
number of diagonal parallel ridges (or folds forming ridges) running backward and
inteejSal anatomy of buella.
487
oiihvard horn the central portion. The transverse muscles are inserted at both ends at
the level of the tioor of the pharynx; tlrus, when they contract, instead of pulling the
lateral edges of the roof of tlie pharynx together they straighten losing their arched
lorm, and then press upon the portion of the upper surface of the pharynx lyino>
immediately beloAV them respectively, and thereby effectually close it. I have not
liitherto detected similar curved constrictor pharyngis muscles in any of the Acarina.
T/ie (EsoxjIukjuh follows immediately upon tlie pharynx, and is, as usual, a long and
substantial membranous lube m the median line of the body, runnin"- rio-ht through the
centre of the brain ; its com-se being backward and slightly upward. There is an
indication of its being a little plicated into shallow longitudinal folds to allow of
expansion and contraction ; it hardly .stains at all, but certain scattered, very minute
nuclei on its exterior surface stain deeply. The folding and certain projections on the
inner surface of the oesophagus produce a very irregular lumen (fig. 28) in the o<reater
part of the anterior portion of the organ ; although at one point the lumen is circular
and extremely minute. Something like this irregular lumen is figured, but not
described, by Nalepa in Tyroglyphns *.
There is, however, one most important matter in which the oesophagus of Bdella is
utterly ditterent from the corresponding organ in all other Acarina the anatomy of
which is known to me ; this is that from the dorsal surface of the oesojjhao-us of Bdella
almost immediately behind the pliarynx, there springs an immense diverticulum
(tigs, 3, 4, 34), re) ; which, w^here it leaves the oesophagus, is a tube slightly smaller than
the oesophagus itself, and is surrounded by an annular constrictor muscle (^mo; fio-. 84) ;
it, however, almost immediately enlarges to a tube somewhat wider than the oesophao-us,
and thus continues for a short distance ; I call this portion the neck. At the distal end
of this neck the organ enlarges, either suddenly or gradually, and forms an immense
sac, either elliptical or pyriform ; botli the sac and the neck are capable of o-reat
expansion and contraction, and the size depends greatly upon the amount of their
contents for the moment ; they are usually considerably larger in the female than in the
male. Although, for these reasons, the size cannot be accurately stated, yet it may be
more or less gathered from the space which the organ occupies : the dorsal surface of
the sac adjoins the ventral surface of the azygous salivary gland ; its sides are embraced
by the pericibal salivary gland, which also curls over a portion of the dorsal surface
which is not covered by the azygous gland ; its posterior end presses against the anterior
end of the ventriculus, while its ventral surface overlies the oesophagus and the dorsal
surface of the supra-oesophageal ganglion of the brain. The organ is simply a mem-
branous sac with sloutish walls. There c;in, I think, be but little doubt of its function ;
it is, in my opinion, analogous to the so-called sucking-stomach in such Lepidoptera
as Danais archiiJpus-\, Sphinx lujmti-i, Foiitia b/rissicw t, and others, and in the Diptera
and some Hymenoptera, such us Cruhro.
* "Die Auatomic dcr Tyroglyphen," !^itzb. k.-k. Akad. Wien, Bd. xc. Abth. 1 (18S4), p. 198, and Bd. xcii.
(1885), p. IIU, Taf. i. lig. 8.
t E. Burgess, "Contributions to the Anatomy of the Milk-weed Butterfly (i>«n«i'4- arduppus),'" Auniv. Men:.
Boston Soc. lyat. Hist. 18bi).
+ Newport, in Todd's ' C'yclopEedia,' article " Insecta,'' tigs. 43(J, 431.
66*
488 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THB
This organ lias possibly been imperfectly seeu by Karpelles (8) and by Professor
Berlese; indeed, it is so conspicuous that no one dealing, even in the roughest manner,
with the anatomy of Bdella could help seeing it. In bis great work on tlie Italian
Acarina (l), wbich is systematic, not anatomical, Berlese does not say a single word about
the internal anatomy of Bdella, but in the introductory portion of liis " Ordo Pro-
stigmata " (Trombidiidas) he gives a plate of parts of the striicture of Bdella (chiefly
external and the trophi). His fig. 3 is stated to be the rostrum seen from the side, and
fig. 4 is stated to be the hypostoma (maxillary lip) seen from below : it is rather a
difficult drawing to understand with any certainty, because other organs which
lie above the hypostome are shown and there is not anything to indicate that they are seen
through the hypostome ; thus the pharynx is drawn, and even the muscles on the dorsal
side of the pharynx, although both the hypostome and the pharynx itself must lie
between them and the eye of the observer. One of the organs figured, a long way
posterior to the hypostome, is a sac, which is, I believe, the sixcking-stomach ; it is
lettered "in" and in the explanation of the plate ^' in'" is given as "ingluvies": this
is the whole of the information regarding it. Berlese comes tolerably near the function,
but he entirely mistakes its anatomy and position in the body ; indeed, his fig. 4 does
not agree with his fig. 3 : in the latter the oesophagus only is shown, but in the former
the oesophagus, which would lie between the eye of the observer and the sucking-
stomach, is not shown at all, and the pharynx is shown as leading straight into the
"■ ingluvies," and the hinder portion of the canal as leading directly out of the i^osterior
end of the same organ, thus making it a crop forming part of the main line of the canal
itself. This is wholly incorrect, unless the species which he has drawn from differs entirely
from every Bdella. which I have dissected or sectioned, in all of which the sucking-
stomach has been a stalked blind-ended diverticulum of the dorsal side of the oesophagus.
Karpelles, if he saw the sucking-stomach at all (8), had previously made practically the
same mistake ; indeed he, if I understand his drawng, did a trifle worse, for lie drew tlie
sucking-stomach as not only a part of the main tract of the alimentary canal but also
as continuous at its i^osterior end with the ventriculus, without any constriction between
the two.
It is, I believe, now generally admitted that the svicking-stomach, although still called
by that name, is not really a sticking-organ, biit is a stalked food-reservoir wherein, in
the case of Bdella, the juices which have been sucked out of the creature's prey by the
action of the pharynx, whicli is the true sucking-apparatus, are stored for a time The
sac in Bdella is usually full, or partly full, and the contents are precisely the same as
those found in the pharynx, cesophagus, and ventriculus — viz., the blood of the prey tliat
the Bdella has been sucking. In two or three specimens of B. Basteri which were
picked oft' seaweed, where they had been feasting upon Thysanuridse, and placed
immediately in alcohol, a sagittal median section shows this food-mass in the sucking-
stomach coagulated and cibsolutely continuous with a thin rod of the same coagukited
material in the mouth, pharynx, and oesophagus, and even joined to tlie food-mass in the
ventriculus. I have liitherto used the name of " sucking-stomach " for the organ, as it so
well known in the Insecta ; but as it gives an erroneous idea of the function, and as the
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 489
■word ingluvies is more properly used for a crop ia the direct liae of the caual, I propose
the name of " receptaculiuii cihi " for the stalked food-sacs.
The remainder of the oesophagus does not appear to require any special notice ; it
terminates, as usual, in the ventriculus.
The Ventriculus (fig. 6) is greatly flattened dorso-ventrally, forming a shallow layer
near the dorsal surface; it is far best studied in young specimens, as in older ones,
where the ventriculus is more distended both by the food in the lumen and by that
which has been absorbed by the cells which form the walls of the organ, and where the
genital organs are fully developed, the ventriculus is forced into every availalole space
and its true foi*m is difficult to follow : this difficulty, however, does not exist in the
younger creatures. Fig. 6 is drawn from a female of B. Basteri, matu.re but only
lately emerged from the nymphal skin. It will be seen fx'om this drawing that the
ventriculus consists of a short, more or less elliptical sac with a slight median projection
forward, and having from its antero-lateral edge two rather short, paired caecal
diverticula directed forward, and from its postero-lateral margin two broad and long
paired caeca directed backward. These last-named caeca have the inner edge simple and
almost straight ; but the outer edge is divided into rounded lobes, w^hich diminish
in size from liefore backward — /. e. the anterior lobe is much the largest and the posterior
mucli the smallest. Thus the whole organ forms a sort of irregular, comi^ressed, and
elongated horse-shoe.
The histology of the ventriculus is, as might be expected, very similar to that described
by Heukin in Trombidmm fuUginosum ; of course there are some differences. The
exterior of the organ is a fine tunica propria, so delicate that it is usually impossible to
dissect the ventriculus out without breaking it ; on the inner side of this tunic is a single
row of large columnar epithelial cells with small oval nuclei, about 8/i in diameter, very
clearly nucleolated, placed near the exterior ends of the cells. The cells themselves
vary greatly in form and size in difl'erent parts of the ventriculus, and of course in
diffei'ent individuals ; the cells on the dorsal side of the ventriculus usually average
longer than tliose on the ventral side. In an adult weU-fed male specimen of B. Basteri
the cells are ordinarily from about "0 J. mm. to abou.t "12 mm., in the female they are even
longer. The exterior portion of the cell is filled with fine reticular protoplasm ; the
interior part, next the lumen, is generally crowded with food-droplets, precisely similar
to the contents of the sucking-stomach ; this is even more marked in the female than the
male, liut in both sexes the inner portions of the cells are usually almost full of them.
Digestion appears to be iutra-cellular : no food-ball or mass, and indeed very little food,
is usually found in the lumen of the viscus, unless tlie creature has been killed almost
when feeding ; it is all in the cells. The process described by Hcnkin, that the inner
ends of some of the cells get more or less filled with a granular dark material, and then
are constricted ott* and fall into the lumen of tlie viscus, occurs also in Bdella, but
apparently much less frequently and to a much smaller degree than in Henkin's Acarvs.
Excretory Organ. — We now come to the subject of the hind-gut, h\xi in all the
Trombidiuiu-grou]) of Acari it is impossible to treat this separately from the excretory
organ ; the two are either identical or so intimately connected as to render it necessary
490 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
to describe botli together. lu my late paper on Tlnjas petroph'dus (14), which is
frequently referred to in this treatise. I have entered so fully into the history of wliat
former authors have said upon this point that I do not think it would he proper tO'
repeat it all here, and will only give such a short statement of it as is necessary in order
that what I have to say about Bdella may be easily understood.
Croneberg (4) describes the ventriculus of Ei/lais extendens (Hydrachnidije) and of
Trombid'mm (5) as a viscus closed posteriorly and not connected with any anus ; he says
that there is not any passage for ftecal matter or solid remains of food out of the
ventriculus, and that the anus-like opening, which certainly exists, only gives exit to
the excreta of the Malpighian vessels and does not communicate with the alimentary
canal. This opinion of the extremely careful Kussian anatomist was in direct opposition
to the previously expressed oj)inion of Pagensteclier (17) relative to Tromhidimn; he
considered the opening to be the anus, and what Croneberg calls the " Malpighian
vessel " to be the rectum and to be in communication with the mid-gut in the ordinary
manner. Henkin, in his researches into the anatomy of Trombidimn fuUginostiin (6),
failed to find any communication between the ventriculus and hind-gut or Malpighian
vessel, whichever it should be called, but he thought that there must be one, although he
could not see it; he says that where the Malpighian vessel of Croneberg overlies the
A-entriculus the walls of the latter organ become vague, and that he should think
there must be a communication tliere, although he could not find it. Next came
Schaub : speaking about Hydrodroma (Hydrachnidis) (18), he agrees with Croneberg that
the anus-like opening is not an anus, and that it is only the point of discharge of the
Malpighian vessel, which does not communicate with the ventriculus or any part of the
alimentary canal ; but he says that just anterior to the so-called anus there is a much
smaller opening, which is the real anus; and he says that to this smaller opening a
distinct hind-gut passes from the ventriculus, with which it is in communication. There
is no doubt that this smaller opening exists in Sydi'odroma, and Haller* had seen
and figured it before Schaub did. Haller simply calls it a preanal opening, without
suggesting its function. No one has seen this smaller opening in any creature of the
Tro7nliid'mm-gYo\n[) except Hydrodroma, and no one except Schaub has ever recorded
seeing this hind-gut distinct from the Malpighian vessel.
A year later Schaub published a paper (19) on Pontarachna (Hydrachnidse) : there he
only figures a single opening, which he calls the " anus," precisely as previous writers
had done in other members of the group ; he does not say whether it is the exit of the
Malpighian vessel, or of the hind-gut, or of both; nor whether there is a hind-gut
distinct from the excretory organs or not. Karpelles (8) ignores all previous autliors
and treats the excretory organ of Bdella arenaria confidently as the rectum, but says
that he never could find any food-ball in it.
In Thy as petroph'dus (Hydrachnidse) (14) I certainly observed but one opening, and
that decidedly communicated with the excretory organ (Malpighian vessel) and
* "Die Aiteii unci Gattungeii der schweizcr HjdracLnidenfaune," Mittheil. Schweizer. entom. Gosellseli. ISbl',
p. 18.
INTERNAL ANATOMY .OF. BUELLA. 491
with that only; there clearly was not any separate hiad-g'ut. I was not able to trace
any commLinication between the Malpighian vessel aad the ventricuUis, although I took
great pains in searching for it in numerous specimens, still I do not deny the possibility
of its existing at some time of year or at some period of life ; all I say is, that I could
not find it, and that the walls both of the ventriculas and of the excretory organ appeared
to me to be perfectly clear, without any vague places, in those specimens whicli I
examined. Bdella would not be at all a favoural)le genus in which to investigate this
question ; the walls of the ventriculus and excretory ox'gan are not so firm and sub-
stantial as in Tlnjas, and in mature specimens the latter is so enveloped by the former
as to make the exact relations of the two difl&cult to trace. I should not therefore base
any opinion on the subject upon Bdella ; but, so far as it goes, I was not able to trace
any communication between the ventriculus and the excretory organ in this creature any
more than I could in Thjas ; still it is possible that such a communication might exist
and be extremely difficult to see. It is quite certain that neither any second opening,
such as that of Hydrodroma, nor any separate hind-gut, sucli as Schaub describes in that
Hydraclinid, exists in any species of Bdella which I have investigated : it is equally
certain that I have never found any trace of food-material or faecal matter in the
excretory organ of any Bdella ; the contents have invariably been solely the white
crystalline matter (appearing black by transmitted light on account of its opacity) which
one usually finds in the so-called Malpighian vessels of Acarina.
In considering the question of whether the mid-gut ends l^lindly or communicates witli
a hind-gut and anus, it must not be forgotten that the creatures of this group are almost
all strictly predatory and suctorial ; they never consu.me any solid food, but live entirely
upon the juices of their victims ; this applies to Bdella.
Were it not for Schaub's paper on Ihjdrodroma I should consider that the so-called
Malpighian vessel in Bdella and other allied creatures was the homologue of the hind-
gut in other Acari, and from disuse had become a Malpighian organ only ; but of course,
if Hijdrodroma really has a hind-gut in addition to a similar Malpighian vessel, it would
seem to prove that in all other investigated creatures of the Trotnbklmm-gron'p the hind-
gut must have become obsolete, and vanished without leaving a trace of its former
existence.
In Bdella the excretory organ, whether it be the liomologue of the hind-gut or not, is
exceedingly simple : it is an elongated sac (figs. 31<, E & 7), rather widest at the anus, or
what is usually called the " anus," narrowest about the middle, and swelling out again
somewhat at the anterior end. The organ is distensible, but is neither branched,
folded, nor plicated; it is capable of considerable expansion and contraction; it runs
along the median line of the body close to the dorsal surface, through the cuticle of
which it generally shows as a strong white band ; its anterior end is usually about in the
perpendicular plane of the coxa3 of the second pair of legs, i. e., pei-pendicularly above
the hinder part of the sub-oesophageal portion of the brain ; it varies somewhat in length,
and it immediately underlies the dorsal skin as far back as the genital aperture, then it
turns somewhat downward to reach the anus, which, however, is subterminal. In young
males its coiu-se may be plainly seen passing between the two great hind caeca of the
492 ME. A, D. MICHAEL ON THE
ventri cuius, but separate from them. In mature specimens, especially females, in
consequence of the great growth of the ventriculus and caeca and the distension of the
cells composing their walls by the absorption of food-material, and partly also in
consequence of the pressure of the immense genital organs, the ventirculus and caeca are
forced into every available space, and tlie caeca are pressed against each other in the
median line of the dorsum ; thus the excretory organ comes to be entirely surrounded
by the ventriculus and its ctcca, and seems as if it passed through their substance (see
figs. 34, 43).
The walls of the Malpighian vessel consist of a strong, clearly marked external layer of
more or less hexagonal pavement-epithelium cells, with conspicuous oval nuclei of about
5 ft to 10^, and nucleoli ; they are often doubly nucleated ; within this epithelium is a layer
of almost cubical secreting cells.
The contents of the Malpighian vessel in Bdella are small, crystalline, opaque, white,
more or less globiilar concretions of urinary material, similar to that found in the
Malpighian organs of other Acari ; in Bdella, however, they seem, in oldish specimens, to
accumulate to such an extent that they adhere together and often form a solid rod almost
filling the organ. This white matter usually shows through the dorsal cuticle, and often
looks, at first sight, like a wliite, or pale yellow, stripe running longitudinally in the
median line of the notogaster ; the rod when formed may sometimes be dissected out and
remain quite unbroken and hard. In other specimens the granules do not adhere, but,
although scattered, nearly fill the vessels ; in some cases, particularly where the sj)ecimen
is young, the quantity of white matter is small.
The anus (fig. 34, A), if that be its proper name, is a longitudinal slit near the hinder
end of the creature, and is closed by two labia (cf. fig. 7), to which divaricator muscles
(fig. 34, mda) are attached.
The Salivary Glands (so-called).
(Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 34.)
I retain the expression " salivary glands," because it has been used by so many
authors, and is perfectly well understood as referring to tlie group of glands which I am
about to treat of in this section : I have, however, in my paper on Thijas petrophilus (14)
beibre referred to, expressed considerable doubts whether this important and varied series
of glands really have solely the function which is implied by the name ; there does not
seem to be any very convincing mode of settling this question, and I hardly see how
to carry it further than can be gathered from the probabilities involved in the position
of the points where their ducts discharge. In the same paper I have entered fully into
what previous authors who have dealt Avith these glands in Acarina belonging to the
Trombidium-gvou-p of families have said regarding them ; as in the case of other organs
for Avhich I have done the same, I do not propose to repeat the whole bibliography
here, bu^t rather to confine myself to the description of the parts in Bdella, referring
only to former authors where it seems likely to give greater clearness or to assist in
settling doubtful questions.
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 493
The general nature of tlie glands and their arrangement will be found, as might be
anticipated, to correspond to a great extent with those of the Trombidiidaj and
Hydrachnidie, but the diflerences are considerable.
In Bdella this system of glands may be said to be divided into three groups ; of these
there are two grouj^s of paired glands and one single azygous gland. The general
arrangement of these glands and ducts will probably be best understood from the drawing
(fig. 8) ; it must, however, be stated that this is a diagram in the sense that (to save
space) it is not drawn quite to scale, although kept as near nature as possible. Group 1
consists, on each side of the body, of three glands, which viltimately discharge by one
common duct (D), each gland and duct being paired by its fellow on the opposite side of
the body. The exact shapes of the respective glands vary a good deal in different
individuals, and probably in the same individual at different periods. One of these
glands is placed at the posterior end of the main common duct, and is in position a con-
tinuation of the duct ; this gland is what is known as the " tnhnlar salioary glantV {sfft) i n
Tromhidium, the Hydrachuidae, and other forms. It is far simpler than the corresjjonding
structiu-e in Thyas j^etrophilus, and in B. Basterl consists of a tubular or sausage-shaped
gland having a diameter of from about "03 mm. to al)out '00 mm. and a less varying
lumen of about 015 to "02 mm. It has thick fleshy walls composed of moderate-sized
cells with small clear nuclei. The lumen of this gland is extremely small, but perfectly
distinct. The point where the duct emerges from the gland is between tiie first and
second legs, usually about halfway or rather nearer the first leg ; thence the gland runs
almost straight backward near the side of the body ; this course is continued for more
than half tlie length of the gland, then it curves sharply inward, and the curve is
continued so as to Ibrm an approach to a semi-circle ; thence the gland runs forward
again parallel to its former course, but nearer to the median line of the body ; it does not,
hoAvever, reach anything like as far forward as the proximal end from which the duct
starts. Einally, the gland once more turns backward and again runs parallel to its
lormer coiuse, so that the whole gland is more or less S-shaped. The distal end is
csecal and rounded ; from it and also from the first bend fine ligaments run to the side
of the body ; that from the first bend, whicli is the strongest, runs to the cuticle near
to the inner edge of the acetabulum of the first leg ; this to some extent resembles the
arrangement described by Schaub in llijdrodroma (i8. his p. 123 and fig. 4) ; the ligaments
at and near the distal end of the gland run to the cuticle further back in the body.
In Bdella Basteri this gland bears a short caecum {ca's). The whole gland in Bdella
is quite simple, without any of the corrugations found in 1 ht/as jjetmphilus din^i othev
forms, and without the terminal bladder or reservoir found in that species.
The Main Common Duct (D) starts from the anterior end of the tubular salivary gland
{s(jt), and runs attached to, and during a large part of its course partly imbedded in, the
cuticle of the side of the body. Although so vmited to the cuticle and so sunk in it, the
duct does not really form part of it ; on the contrary, the greater part of the duct may
occasionally, by careful dissection, be detached from the skin. The duct is substantial
in the thickness of its waU, and usually preserves its round form in sections — i. e., it does
not collapse : it generally shows more or less of a ringed structure ; often it is very
SECOND SEllIES.— ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 67
494 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
plainly i-inged : this feature is frequently found in tlie principal ducts of the Acarina, in
which order a ringed tube is more likely to be a duct thau a trachea.
The course of the main common duct is as follows : starting from the tubular gland
it runs forward a little, and then curves round the outer side of the acetabulum of the
first leg ; it then runs forward along the shoulder of the creature, usually in a some-
what undulating line, but on the whole tending slightly inward, until it enters the
rostrum and apj)roaches very near to the palpus ; it then turns suddenly inward toward
the median line, and runs across the upj)er surface of the chitinoiis roof upon which
the mandibles rest, passing beneath the proximal ends of the mandibles ; on reaching
nearly to the median line the duct turns slightly forward, joins its fellow from the other
side of the body, and the two together discharge into a membranous space upon the
chitinous roof and between the mandibles near their proximal ends.
The Henifonn Gland. — A short distance anterior to the acetabulum of the first leg
the common duct receives the special duct (fig. 9, dr) from a very large gland (tigs. 8, sgr);
this duct is small and fine, does not show any ringed structure, and enters the upper
surface of the common duct. The ghrnd which discharges by this small duct is one of
the largest in the creature ; it is clearly the homologue of the " reniform salivary gland "
in Thyas ■petropMlus, and of Schaub's " larger dorsal mouth-gland " in SyJrodroma.
Pagenstecher, in TromJddium, and Guddon*, in Tyroglyphns, have also figured homologous
glands, but without specially naming them. I liave retained the name " reniform gland,"
but the gland in Bdella (fig. 9) is somewhat different in form from any of those hitherto
described : it cannot be called reniform ; it varies somewhat in shape, but is usually irre-
gular, approaching an oval, and is flattened, its thickness not averaging above a third of
its breadth ; it is placed on edge in the body, which is not the case with any of the other
recorded homologous glands, and has the more pointed end forward ; its inner surface
is nearly flat, but the outer surface is more convex ; probably adapting itself some-
what to the form of the side of the body. This gland stains only slightly with
hsematoxylin or carmine : it is composed of extremely large, almost gigantic, cells
radiating from a centre ; these cells have an extreme length varying from about "15 mm.
to over '2 mm., and an exti-eme width of about half those measurements, and have
large, clear, elliptical nuclei of about "03 mm., somewhat regularly arranged, with very
distinct nucleoli of about "015 mm. This gland always contains a chamber more or less
wedge-shaped {cv) on its outer edge ; this chamber is apparently one of the cells broken
down and transformed, for it often contains a nucleus, but it is usually filled with dark-
coloured and highly-refractive granules, measuring from i ^ to 7 /i ; it communicates with
a small central pocket, from which the duct starts. Sometimes this wedge-shajied
chamber appears to invade and absorb the adjoining cells, and then becomes very large.
The anterior Salivary Gland. — Just before entering the rostrum the upper surface of
the common duct receives another special duct (fig. 8), which is much shorter and still
finer than that from the " reniform gland " : the gland {sga) from which this duct leads
will be the homologue of the " quadrate salivary gland '' in Thyas petrophilus, and of
* " Beitrag zur Lehre von dcr Scabies," Wiirzburgcr medicinische Zeitsch. 1861, p. 801 ; and "Zweite vermehrte
Auflage," AViirzburg, 18C3.
INTEENAL ANATOMY OP BDELLA. 49.5,
Scbaub's " smaller dorsal mouth-gland " iu Eydrodroma, if the place where the duct
discharges, and the cunuectiou of that duct Ije, as usual, taken as dcteriuiniug the homo-
logies ; but as it may be possible that this giaud is more to be regarded as the homolo'>'uo
of the small gland which discharges by the duct " c/i^' in Tliyas petrophilus (fig. 10 ia
my paper, 14), I have thought it best not to use the name " quadrate salivary eland"
lor the gland in question: for the sake of clearness I shall call it the "anterior
salivary giaud " in this paper. It is a rather small, rounded, or heart-shaped gland ]yin<»
in the anterior corner of the dorsal vertex, and its posterior side is closely pressed a"-aiust
the front end of the reniform gland when the two are in situ ; so that it is very difficult
to distinguish this gland from tbe reniform in sections, and, indeed, it can only be done
by the thin ttuiica propria which envelops the gland, and Ijy the fact that the anterior
salivary gland stains more deeply than the reniform, and has a slightly ditferent histolu-
giciil structure, its secretion is a mass of dark-coloured granules.
The Fericibal Salloary Glands. — The two other paired salivary ^lands (fio's. 10
and oli sgp) lie one on each side of the receptaculum cibi (sucking-stomachj, and clasp that
organ ; they are apparently the " preventricuiai- glands " of Karpelles (8). These glands,,
which I will call the pericibal salivary glands *, bear considerable resemblance in "-eneral
form and appearance to the reniform gland, against which their outer sides are closely
pressed ; like it they stand on edge in the body, and are a flattened oval or almost
elliptic ; the outer sides adapt themselves to the form of the inner sides of the reni-
form giaud, while their inner sides adapt themselves to the receptaculum cibi (suckino--
stomach); they embrace practically almost the whole sides of that organ except the
narrow neck, and by an increase in their thickness they curl over the top of its posterior
portion. They are composed of large cells nidiating from a centre and provided with
large and distinct roundish nuclei and nucleoli ; the cells, however, are not so lar"-e as
those of the reniform gland. The contents of these cells stain deeply with hematoxylin,
and then present more the appearance of a network, and less of granulation than those
of the reniform gland. In the centre of the gland, where the apices of the cells come
together, there is a very minute open sx)ace from which the duct starts. There is a
small valve at the commencement of ihe duct of this, and indeed of each of the paired
glands except the tubular, formed by the thickening of the walls of the duct, so as to
constitute tAvo labia pressed against each other. The duct itself is long and fine ; in
well-preserved specimens it exhibits a slightly ringed structure of its inner coat ; it
passes along the side of the receptaculum cibi (sucking-stomach) in an almost straight
Une, goes just below the chitinous bridge and chitinous roof, and discharges by a small
opening just at the proximal corner of the epipharynx (tig. 2, dpj). From the position
of the mouth of the duct it would appear probable that this gland is a true salivary
gland ; whether those that discharge by the common duct into the space between the
mandibles and above the chitinous bridge have the same function must be more
doubtful ; it would seem possible that they lubricate the mandibles, but glands of such
importance would scarcely be wanted for that purpose only.
* I do not use Karpellcs's name of " preventriculur glands," because they are not iiomologous with the "-lands
which bear that name in the UribatidiB.
67*
496 MK. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
"Whether tlie pericibal gland of Bdella can be considered as the homologue of any
particular gland in Thyas, TromhicUmn, and Hijdrodroma, seems to me to be uncertain :
the fact that each pericibal gland of Bdella discharges by its own special duct into a
place different from, the point of discharge of the common duct, whereas all those of
Thyas and Tromhidium discharge by the common duct, is greatly against such homo-
logy ; but, on the other hand, the number of glands is the same in all : if there be any
homology it would be between the pei'icibal gland of Bdella, the quadrate salivai'y gland
of Thyas, and the smaller dorsal mouth-gland of Sydrodroma ; but this can only be the
case if the anterior salivary gland of Bdella be the homologue of the small gland to which
the duct " dsa " leads in Thyas.
The Azygous Salivary Oland. — The last of the so-called salivary glands to be described
is the azygous (figs. 10 and 34, so, and 12). Whether this gland can be considered to be
tlie homologue of the " azygous salivary gland" in Thyas petrophilus, the only species in
which an azygous salivary gland has been described, is again a question which admits of
differences of opinion : the mere fact that such a gland exists in each would raise a
presumption that they were homologous ; but not only has the gland in Bdella an
importance immensely in excess of that of the gland in Thyas, but the gland of Thyas is
situated in the rostrum, whereas that of Bdella is in the cephalothorax behind the
rostrum ; that in Thyas is about the middle (dorso-ventrally) of the rostrum, whereas
the gland in Bdella is jiressed against the extreme dorsal surface of the cephalothorax.
The duct in Thyas discharges much further forward than that of Bdella ; and, finally,
the histology is about as different as that of two glands can well be ; the gland in Thyas
having a minute structure very like that of the tubular salivary glands of Bdella, while
the gland in Bdella is a solid, but not fleshy, organ, with a very small irregular lumen,
or sometimes without any distinct lumen, from the fact that its sides may become pressed
together, and composed of largish columnar cells, which have the ends which come to
the exterior of the organ slightly enlarged ; in these enlarged ends are situated the small
nuclei, with very distinct and dark-staining, but small, nucleoli (fig. 34j. The cell-
contents hardly take stain at all; the cell-walls * do not stain, but yet are very easily seen.
In Bdella Basferi the cells have an average length of about "04 to '05 mm., but some
near the posterior end are longer, by an average breadth of about 10^ to 12 /«. The
nuclei have an average diameter of about 5 /», and the nucleoli of under 2 in. For the
same species the cell-contents have the appearance of a very fine network ; whereas in
some of the smaller Bdellce, e. g., B. vulgaris, the gland is even more solid and has the
appearance of having an almost tendinous consistency (fig. 12).
The azygous gland is a very large one ; in B. Basteri it has an average lengtli of about
•4 mm. in the male, and of about "5 mm. in the female, with a breadth of about '17 mm.,
and a thickness of about '15 mm. to '19 mm. in its thickest part. In some of the smaller
species it is even larger in proportion. In B. Basteri the exterior of the gland, when
* The expression " cell-wall " in this paper is not employed in the restricted sense in which it is used by many
modern writers on vegetable liistology, viz. as meaning formed (secreted) material only ; it is used, for want of any
other equivalent expression known to me, in a general sense to signify the partition between cell and cell irrespective
of how that partition originates or of what it is composed.
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF 13DELLA. 497
dissected out, is naturally deep red, which makes it conspicuous. TIic form of the organ
varies considerably in difTerent species, and even varies in different specimens of the
same species ; but such variations in the one species only involve differences in the
proportion of length to breadth, and of the comparative lengths of the anterior and
posterior points, and such matters ; the general plan of tlie form is always similar in
the same species, so far as I have seen.
The shajje, being rather complicated, will be much better understood from the
drawings than from descriptions. In Bdella Basteri the ventral surface of tbe organ,
wiiich is pressed against the dorsal surface of the rcceptaculum cibi, is almost flat, but
cut away from the ventral surface at the anterior end, i. e. the dorsal part of the
anterior end overhangs ; the posterior end bends slightly downward ; both anterior and
posterior ends are broad pointed projections, Avith convex sides; behind the anterior
pi'ojection the gland widens suddenly, and forms a kind of shelf or platform near, but
not at, the ventral surface of the gland ; upon this platform, commencing a little way
behind its anterior edge, are two large rolls of substance arranged longitudinally, and
with their inner sides so closely pressed together that they often practically fuse in the
adults ; but in the nymphs they are distinct, and give the gland the appearance of
having had a double origin, or at all events that this part of it has been a horseshoe-
sliaped structure, which has become pressed together; this horseshoe shape is very
apparent in horizontal sections of the gland, even in the adults. These rolls continue for
about half the length of the organ ; then rolls and platform, and the rest of the organ,
gradually merge and lose their identity, all contributing to form the posterior portion.
The duct from this gland is siiort and straight, but is ratber large in diameter and
somewhat wrinkled longitudinally, and is evidently capable of expansion ; it springs
from the median line of the gland between the anterior ends of the two rolls spoken of
above ; in sections it may be traced some way into the substance of the gland. The
anterior end of the duct is enlarged, and forms an ovate membranous chamber (fig. 11),
which is generally more or less filled with the secretion of the gland. This chamber
commences behind the mandibles, but reaches a little between their proximal ends ; there
this gland-serving chamber discharges into a space continuous with the air-chamber from
which the principal tracheal trunks spring. The secretion found in the glandular
chamber is a yellow oily liquid, and in specimens which have been in alcohol a yellow
fibrous or crystalline ball may frequently be found in the chamber.
The Brain and Nervous System.
(Figs. 13, 11, 15, 27, 31.)
The so-called brain — i. e., the great central nervous mass — in the Arachidna doubtless
represents an oesophageal collar, consisting of a sujira-oesophageal ganglion and a sub-
ousophageal ganglion joined together by commissures. In the Acarina, however, the
concentration of the ganglia is so extreme, and the commissures are so short and broad,
that the distinction of parts is usually almost or entirely lost. Thus, for instance, in the
llydrachnidse the brain has usually become one elliptical or almost globular organ,
pierced by the passage for the oesophagus, but in which it is very hard to distinguish
498 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
any parts; there is not any sign of commissures, and the fusion between the supi'a- and sub-
CESOjihageal ganglia is so intimate that it is impossible to say where one terminates and
the other commences. This will be well seen in Schaub's figures and descriptions of the
brain of Hydrodroma *, and in my own figures and descriptions of Thyas petrophilus f .
It will be seen by Henkin's figure of a section of the brain of TromMdium fuliginosumX
that the form tbere is not so globular, notwithstanding the close connection between
Tromhidium and the Hydrachnidse ; it will also be seen, by my paper on the brain in
Oribatidaj and other forms §, that the spherical form is not usually approached so closely
in other families of Acarina as it is in the Hydrachnidce ; still the whole usually forms
one mass, which may be irregular in shaj)e, but in which all sharp demarcation of parts is
lost. Bdella can hardly be said to form any excej)tion to this rule ; it would scarcely be
possible to say where the commissures are ; the supra- and sub-oesoj^hageal ganglia
practically join one another ; still the origin from the two separate ganglia is far more
clearly shown, and the two are more distinct, than in any other Acarid with which I
am acquainted. Taking Bdella Basteri (which is an exceedingly good example) as a
type, the sub- oesophageal ganglion (fig. 13, 34, gsu) consists of an almost oblong
layer of ganglionic matter having an average length (in the male) of about '4 or '42 mm.,,
by an average breadth of about "17 mm. It is much flattened dorso-ventrally, the
thickness not being above 08 mm. where it meets the sujora-oesophageal ganglion,
diminishing almost to an edge at its posterior end ; it lies almost touching the ventral
surface, and extends from a little in front of the first pair of legs anteriorly to about
midway between the second and third pairs of legs posteriorly.
The supra-oesophageal ganglion {gso) is about % of the length of the sub-oesophageal ;
it is situated upon (above), and slightly in advance of, the sub-oesophageal, so that the
anterior edge of the former overlaps the anterior edge of the latter. The oesophagus
runs between the two ; both, but chiefly the supra-oesoj)hageal ganglion, are excavated
to afi"ord it a jiassage ; the sub-oesophageal is thickest, dorso-ventrally, just where it
meets the posterior edge of the supra-oesojjhageal, and then thins away toward its
own anterior edge, and the under surface of the supra-oesophageal follows and joins it.
The oesophagus does not run in a horizontal line through the brain, but in a diagonal,
sloping upward and backward ; it enters the anterior edge of the brain at its ventral
surface and sloping strongly upward emerges at the posterior edge of the supra-
oesophageal and lies upon (above) the part of the sub-oesophageal which lies posterior to
the supra-oesophageal, i. e. about two-thirds of the length of the former.
Looking at the whole brain in a general view, the supra-oesophageal ganglion appears
quite sharply divided from the sub-oesophageal and perched on top of it ; it is only when
one attempts to separate the two, or cuts sections, that the fusion of theii- peripheral parts
is appreciated. What may be called the ground-plan of the supra-oesophageal ganglion, as
seen from above, is almost a square, with the corners somewhat rounded, and a projection
near the middle of each lateral edge, from which projection the palpal nerve arises.
* i8 ; his Taf. V. figs. 2, 3. t 14. figs. 20, 23, and p. 1!)9. J 6 ; his Taf. xxxiv. fig. 7.
§ " On the Form and Proportions of the Brain in the Oribatida; and in some other Aoarina,'' Journ. R. Micr. Soc.
1895, pp. 274-28.;.
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 499
Viewed from the side, or in sagittal section, the supi'a-a?sophageal ganglion is almost
triangular; tliis form is caused hy its being thin at its anterior edge, and thick, dorso-
ventrally, at its posterior, its uj)per surface sloping rapidly upward fi'om before back-
ward, and then falling, almost perpendicularly, to the sub-oesophageal ; the upper surface
is somewhat concave, and faces upward and forward ; the posterior edge forms a wall
standing almost, but not quite, uj) right upon the sub-oesophageal ; round this wall great
bundles of tracheae are wrapped, as hereafter described in the section on the respiratory
organs {wfra, p. 518).
The neurolemma is very fine and delicate, and difficult to see, extremely different
from the substantial neurolemma of the Hydrachnidse. The layer of cortical dark-staining
cells, which is so conspicuous in many of the Acarina, is but feebly developed in Bdella,
and is entirely absent from those parts of the sub-oesophageal from which the six pairs
of large nerves, which arise from that ganglion, start.
With regard to the Nerves I have, in the above-named j^ajoer upon Thyas fetrophilus
(14), stated fully what previous writers have said respecting the nerves of such species
of the Trombidiidoe and allied faimlies as have been studied from the point of view
of their internal anatomy ; I do not therefore intend, in this paper, to refer more to
the bibliography of the subject than is necessary for the proper understanding of any
doubtful or disputed points, the settlement of which may be facilitated by what I have
been able to ascertain in the present investigation : in other cases I shall confine myself
to stating what I find in Bclella.
The ample supply of specimens of Bdella Basferi which I have received has enabled
me to devote a large number to tracing the nerves only, sacrificing all other organs :
this has been done partly by dissection and partly by sections ; but, on the whole, I have
found the former method rather the more efficient on account of the extreme difficulty
of obtainin"' anv stain which will differentiate the nerves in the Acarina from the
surrounding tissues — with me gold chloride, in whatever way employed, has entirely
failed to do so. In no case has a single dissection or section been relied on for a nerve
or branch of one ; I have not put anything into fig. 13 until I have seen it in several
cases : I think, therefore, that all the detail which I am able to give may be relied
on ; I have been able to trace a fair number of the finer branches, but I have little
doubt that plenty of others exist which I have not seen. The creatures are so small,
and tlie nerves so extremely fine and difficult to trace, that it can only be by slow
degrees, and a certain amount of good luck, that jinything like completeness can be
obtained in their study.
As might be anticipated, I find that the nerves agree fairly well with what I found in
Thyas petrophihts, without more difference than would be looked for between two families
which are very distinct, although allied, and differ so much in the anatomy of other
organs.
I have been able to trace in Bclella Basferi one median nerve and ten pairs of bi-
laterally symmetrical nerves ; of these the median nerve and three pairs of the paired
nerves arise from the supra-cesophageal gangKon, and seven pairs of paired nerves from
the sub-a?sopliageal ; those arising from the supra-oesophageal are all small, those from
the sub-ffisophageal mostly large nerves.
500 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
The median nerve (fig. 13, wjjA) is the pharvugeal nerve; this, as in all other
Acarina in which it has been traced, is a thin nerve which arises in the centre of the
anterior edge of the supra-oesophageal ganglion immediately above the oesophagus, and
follows straight along, or rather parallel to and just above, that organ to its distal end :
there it breaks up into a number of fine twigs, some of considerable length; one of these
twigs is sent to each muscle of the sucking-pharynx. In Bclella, however, a compli-
cation of this pharyngeal nerve exists which has not been recorded, and probably does
not exist, in any Acarid the anatomy of w'hich has been studied ; I believe it to be
entirely novel : it is that the pharyngeal nerve, a sliort distance from the brain, splits
into two main branches, an uj^per and an under — the under goes on, as before described,
to supply the pharyngeal muscles, and in fact represents the whole nerve in other families :
the upper branch {nc) runs between the oesophagus and the receptaculum cibi, and
terminates just where the two join; it innervates the ring of sphincter muscle which
surrounds the neck of the receptaculum cibi (sucking-stomach), and possibly sends twigs
to other portions of the sucking-stomach ; but I was not able to make certain of this. In
fig. 13 this upper branch of the pharyngeal nerve is shown turned a little to the right;
if it were left in its natural position, it would entirely hide the lower branch and there
would not be anything to show that two existed.
Of the paired nerves from the supra-oesophageal ganglion those situated a trifle the
nearest to the median line are a pair of very delicate nerves (««;) which innervate the
dorso-ventral muscles near the base of the rostrum ; in reality this pair of nerves, the
mandibular nerves, and the palpal nerves lie almost in a perpendicular line one below
the other, the palpal being lowest, the pair now treated of next, and the mandibular
nerves highest ; in the drawing the mandibular has been bent a trifle to the left, and the
present ])air a trifle to the right in order to show them ; the present pair is, however, a
very little nearer to the median line than the mandibular. JNotwitlistauding this I think
the mandibular must really be regarded as the tirst, and the present as the second pau",
which is tiie same as in Thyas. At a distance from the brain rather less than half the
length of the brain itself this nerve {nv) branches dichotomously. I was not able to
trace its further branching.
The next pair of nerves from the supra-oesophageal ganglion are the mandibular (;iw);
these are situated considerably further towards the lateral edge of the ganglion than
they are in Thyas ; and the reason for this is not difficult to understand. In Thyas the
mandibles are much compressed laterally and lie together close to the median line ; in
Bdella the proximal ends of the mandibles are swollen into large bulbs, tlse two of
which together are as wide as the rostriun. About as far from the brain as two-thirds
of the length of the brain itself there arises from the mandibular nerve a branch-like
structure, which will be best understood from the drawings (figs. 13, 14). The nerve
gives off what may be called a branch, or may be considered a gangHon ; I am inclined
to look upon it in the former light : it is a thin sheet of nervous tissue, rather thicker at
tlie edges, and resembles in form a flattened hour-glass, Avith the corners drawn out into
points and the waist not so thin as in that instrument. Trom each of the two distal corners
of this expansion proceeds a very thin nerve-branch ; these tw^o are, I think, distributed to
INTEENAL INATOMl OF BDELLA. 501
some of the mandibular muscles, but I was not able to ascertain precisely which : the
main trunk of the nerve proceeds into the mandible in the usual manner.
The third and last pair of nerves which I could trace from the supra-oesophageal
ganglion are the optic nerves (no) ; these arise from small eminences about the middle
of the respective lateral edges of the ganglion ; they are the stoutest i^air of nerves
which arise from the ganglion, Ijut are not proportionately as thick as they are in Thy as,
Tromhidium, Uydrodroma, and other forms. I was able to trace one fine branch («o 1)
abovit as far from the brain as two-thirds of the length of the brain itself, which branch
ends in a very small ganglion. The principal trunk of the nerve proceeds to the hinder
and outer of the two eyes (on each side), and there on its outer side expands into a sort
of retinal disc {rd) (figs. 13, 27), which is almost sessile upon the nerve ; the principal
trunk then inclines more forward and less outward, and terminates in an almost similar
disc for the other eye on that side of the body. These retinal discs, although rather more
flattened, are practically the same as those described by Henkin (6) in Tromhidium
fuliyiuosum (his fig. 11, vn).
I was not able to trace any homologues of the thin \)vav of nerves from the posterior
part of the supra-oesophageal ganglion which I found in Tlujas, still it may be possible
that they exist ; they were exceedingly fine in Tlu/as.
The nerves arising from the sub-oesopliageal ganglion are six pairs of thick and odh
pair of thin nerves. The courses of the six thick pairs may be most distinctly ti'aced in
the ganglion itself, running almost to its centre ; they are even cons^iicuous.
The first pair of thick nerves are the palpal nerves. Croneberg, speaking of Eylals
extendens (4), considered that the palj)i were innervated from the sub-oesophageal ganglion.
Nalepa (i6), speaking of Trichodactyliis anonymus (Tyroglyphidse), considered that the
maxillae were served by the sub-, and the maxillary palpi by the supra-oesophageal
ganglion. Schaub (i8) (speaking of Sydrodroma) stated that the palpi were innervated
from the sapra-oesophageal ganglion. Henkin (6) did not trace the i:)alpal nerve. In
Thyas petrophilus the two ganglia are so fused into a ball, and the palpal nerve arises so
exactly on the level of the oesophagus that I was unable to say which ganglion it arose
from. In Bdella Basteri, however, the matter is clear; the palpal nerve {up) sj)rings
from the upper part of the anterior outer corner of the sub-oesophageal ganglion ; it is
a thick nerve, much thicker in proportion than the same nerve in Thyas ; this doubtless
is ex2)lained Ijy the great size and importance of the palpi. It seems to me most
natural to sujijjose that the palpi would be innervated from the sub-oesophageal gauffliou,
because that is the centre whence the maxillary nerves of insects arise ; but of course in
insects the mandibnlar nerves also arise from the sub-oesophageal ganglion, whereas in
the adult Arachnoidea the nerves which serve the mandibles (chelicerse) spring from the
supra-oesophageal ganglion. This, however, is subject to three i-emarks, viz., first, that
Winkler considered that in G<(masus he had found tiie root of the mandibular nei've in
the svib-oesophageal ganglion, and that it passed right througli the substance of the
supra-oesophageal ganglion before emerging — an observation which I have not been
able quite to confirm, although I have a great respect for Winkler's general accuracv ;
secondly, that many Avritei'S, such as Lang and others, consider that the very fact of
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 68
302 . ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
the different innervation prevents these organs in tlie Insecta and the Arachnoidea
being considered homologons ; thirdly, that although nsually in adult Arachnida
the mandibular (clieliceral) nerves, and possibly sometimes the palpal nerves, arise
from the suj)ra-a3sophageal ganglion, in the young embryo the ganglia whence
these nerves spring are not supra-oesopbageal, but work upward in the com-se of
development.
In Bdella a very thin branch, the destination of which I was not able to trace, arises
on the outer side of the nerve almost immediately it leaves the brain. About as far from
the brain as two-thirds of the brain itself the palpal nerve gives off a second and
considerably larger branch, this time from its inner side ; this branch {up 2) innervates
the maxillary lip ; at its distal end, at the lip, it branches and forms two cone-like
structures (iig. 15), evidently of a sensory nature.
The next four pairs of large nerves from the sub-oesophageal ganglion are the leg-nerves
(N 1, N 2, N 3, N 4) ; these are of the iisual type, and are the largest nerves in the body ;
each is accompanied on its anterior side by the so-called accessory nerve [iia) of Crone-
berg, Schaub, and Nalepa. I think I showed in my treatise on Thijas petrophilns that
these accessory nerves are really the first branches of the respective nerve-trunks,
although in many instances they have come to arise from the brain itself just at the
base of the leg-nerve : this, as will be seen by the drawings, is the case in Bdella
Basteri in some of the legs ; but, as before stated, the leg nerve-trunks run far into the
substance of the brain. The accessory nerve of the first leg {na 1), soon after leaving
the brain, expands into an almost triangular lamellar process, similar in nature to
that of the mandibular nerve, and two very fine nerve-branches arise from the anterior
angles of this expansion. The accessory nerve of the second leg {na 2) gives off two thin
opposite branches a short distance from the brain ; a little further on its course it gives
off a rather thicker branch, which extends into a process nearly similar to that from the
accessory nerve of the first leg, and like that gives off two fine branches from its anterior
corners. The third and fourth legs also are accompanied by accessory nerves {na 3, na 4) ;
I was able to trace two extremely fine branches from the latter, but not any processes
on either similar to those on the first and second accessory nerves. The nerve-trunk to
the third leg, about as far from the brain as half the length of the brain itself, gives off
a branch on its inner side, and shortly afterwards a thicker branch on its outer side ; this
branch soon divides dicliotomously : the trunk also gives off another branch on its outer
side further on. The nerve-trunk of the fourth leg is accompanied by a branch springing
from the brain on the inner side as well as the outer, in fact by a second accessory
nerve {nas). The trunk, nearly as far from the brain as the whole length of the brain
itself, gives off a substantial branch. I was able to trace this branch ; it goes to the
nmscles in the body which move the coxa of the fourth leg.
The remaining pair of large nerves are the genital nerves {ng) ; these arise close
together in the centre of the posterior edge of the ganglion ; indeed, they are so close
that just at first their inner edges fuse, making a square, central, posterior projection
from the ganglion, I was able to trace five branches on the underside of each of these
nerve-trunks ; that on the left is shown in. the drawing slightly turned over to expose
I
INTEENAL ANATOMY OF BDELI.A. 503
these branolies. These nerves run above, and are distributed to, the genitalia, and possibly
to some other organs of the hinder part of the body.
The thin pair of nerves from the sub-oesophageal ganglion is a very fine pair {nd)
arising from the brain about midway between the second and third legs ; it innervates
the large dorso-ventral muscles which are situated between these two pairs of legs ; I
found one branch to this nerve. I believe the nerve has not been observed before in
any of the Acarina.
I was not able to find the fine, recurrent, median nerve which exists in Thyas.
The Eyes.
(Figs. 26, 27.)
There is not much to be said respecting these organs, because they do not appear to
vary greatly from the known types of simple eyes in other Arachnida ; they are,
however, more highly developed than those usually found in such Acari as are provided
with those organs.
The optic nerve, as before stated, bifurcates slightly near its distal end— one branch
being in etfect a continuation of the main nerve, and the other being very short; each
branch expands at its end inio what I have called a retinal disc {rcl) ; this is an almost
circular plate, only very slightly cup-shaped—/, e., only slightly concave on the side
next the cuticle. These discs are composed of rather loosely packed ganglionic cells
and are more than one cell thick ; the exterior cells, next the rods, are very distinctlv
nucleated, the nuclei of the deeper cells being more irregular. Abutting on the outer
cells of the disc are a considerable number of rods or retinulac {re) converging to the lens ;
these rods have rounded posterior ends, and are remarkable for the almost entire absence
of pigment between and around them ; much more pigment is found in the eyes of such
Hydrachnidte as I have seen, although tlie rods there are not so distinct nor numerous.
'The smaller outer ends of the rods abut upon the lens {ol), which is bounded exteriorly
by the extremely convex cornea, W' hich is more compact and highly refracting than the
rest ol the lens. The two eyes forming the pair on each side are, from their situation,
turned in slightly different directions ; they are not as close together as in most
Hydrachnidse.
The Eepeoductive System.
Tlie JIale. (Figs. 17, IS, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 10, 11, 42.)
The genital organs of the male Bdella have far more resemblance to those of
Tromhidimii JuUyinosmn, as described by Henkin, than to those of any other Acarid
of which these parts have hitherto been investigated ; indeed, his is the only drawing
and descrijotion which can be said to form any guide to the general arrangement of the
parts : still it is only in the general arrangement that this can be said. Henkin's
descri])tion is, I believe, quite correct in almost every particular. I have dissected
Trombidium Julicjiuosum and have much pleasure in confirming Henkin's work ; but
when we compare it with Bdella, we find that although the two types are more like each
68*
504 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
other than any other known form, yet that they are very different in a large nnniher of
most important points ; and that in some of these points Bdella more resembles other
families of Acarina, wliile in the greater number it is entirely special, and the features
in which it differs from Ti'omhkl'mm cannot be homologized with any Acarus the anatomy
•whereof is known. Anyone looking at Henkin's figure will be inclined to sav that the
genital organs of the male TromhkUiwi are very complicated ; but they may almost be
called simple in comparison with those of Bdella. Pagenstecher came pretty near to
the correct drawing of the male organs of Tromhidmm ; but, as Henkin has already
pointed out, Pagenstecher mistook the sexes, and what he figures as the female organs
are really the male (17. pi. ii. figs. 12, 13, 11).
The male organs of Bdella Basteri may be said to consist of: (1) the testes ; (2) the
embedding-sacs ; (3) the testicular bridge ; (4) the great mucous glands ; (5) the
glandular antechambers ; (6) the penial canal with its accessories ; (7) the azygous
accessory gland ; (8) the laminated gland ; (9) the air-chambers ; and (10) the great
external labia. The astonisliing part of this system is the great size and variety of the
accessory glands.
I have, in several instances, purposely given neutral names to the parts ; the homo-
logies will be described later on.
The Testes (figs. 17, 20, 35, 42, T) are two more or less pyriform masses on each side of
the creature, which, when in slfu, stand almost upright in the body, the larger ends being
upward and the smaller downward : at its smaller (lower) end each testis terminates in
a very short duct (Id, fig. 20) not clearly marked off from the testis ; these two unite and
form a short common duct which enters the end of the testicular bridge. The testes are
in the hind portion of the body, a little behind the genital opening, and are placed
immediately below the hind cfeca of the ventriculus. When the testes are ripe, they
sometimes force their Avay between the lobes of the coecum or push it aside, and thus
may be found pressed almost against the dorsal surface.
The histology and construction of each of these testes bear considerable resemblance
to those of the whole testicular mass, on each side of the body, in Thijas petrophilus ; and
it must be remembered that that organ is divided into two lobes, seeming to give some
indication of a double origin (14. pp. 193, 194, pi. viii. fig. 17, pi. ix. fig. 28). In
Bdella Basteri the exterior timic of each testis, particularly where it rests against the
embedding-sac, and the adjoining part of its outer side {i. e., that part of the testis
which is most remote from its fellow on the same side of the body), is composed of largish
cells (fig. 35, tp), but indistinctly demarcated, containing somewhat solid plasma which
stains freely, and having very clear almost circular nuclei of about "01 mm. diameter, and
nucleoli of about 3 ^ to 4 fi. These cells usually extend over portions of the inner and other
surfaces ; but on the portion of the inner surface furthest from the embedding-sac, and the
surface opposite the sac, and the adjoining parts of the outer surface, their character is
entirely changed in the ripe male ; there these cells have become much more clearly
marked off from each other, considerably larger, and very irregular in form, the nucleus
has entirely disappeared, and t he cell-contents have become divided into numerous
INTEENAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 505
spermatozoa in various stages of development, according to the age of the cell. These are,
of course, the sperm-mother cells (figs. 35, 42) ; the inner wall of each cell eventually
breaks down, and the sjiermatozoa are discharged into a hollow chamber forming
the interior of the portion of the organ which has the nucleated cells as its outer tunic.
When the organ is sectioned, it often appears solid ; this is because the chamber is so
full of secretion and spermatozoa that its lunaen is obliterated ; often, however, it is only
half-full, and then its real nature is seen. It is more than probable that this chamber is
composed of a single cell, which is greatly distended, and has become a species of vesicula
seminalis to receive the contents of the adjoining cells. My reason for making this
suggestion is that tbe chamber frequently, indeed I may almost say usually, contains a
a single, large, most distinct nucleus lying free in the midst of its contents. In some
species, e. g. B. vulgaris, when the spermatozoa are thoroughly ripe, this chamber seems
to occupy almost the wliole interior of the testis, particularly of the front one of each
pair, and it is crowded with large spermatozoa in a ripe condition. The secretion with
which, in addition to spermatozoa, the cell is generally filled must apparently either have
arisen in the cell itself or entered from the embedding-sac (in £. Basteri) ; but if the
latter be the case, it is not clear where the passage is, nor would this account for the
presence of the secretion in the chamber of B. vnlr/atHs, which has not any embedding-
sac.
The testes are largish and fairly well developed in the nymph when approaching full
growth, although of course not nearly so mu.ch so as in the adult, and they do not in
the nymphal stage contain ripe spermatozoa ; but they are very large compared with the
other male sexual organs, such as the great mucous and accessory glands and the
embedding-sac, which at the same period are either very small or altogether absent.
Tlie Bmhedd'mg-sac (figs. 17, 19, 35, es) is a large hollow viscus : on each side of the
body, in an indentation of this viscus, the testes rest ; it is on the exterior side of the
testes, and when in situ is on edge in the body. Although the testes simply lie on the
inner side of the embedding-sac, and are easily removed by dissection, yet they are so
pressed into the wall of tbe sac that two hollows (fig. 19) are formed in the wall of
the embedding-sac, into which the respective testes fit, and in which they are buried to
the depth occasionally of half their thickness. The wall of the emliedding-sac is forced
up between the two testes, forming a considerable ridge. The lower edge of the
embedding-sac rests upon the inner side of the ventral surface of the hind part of the
body. In fig. 17 the two embedding-sacs {es) are shown with the testes in situ, but
they are opened out and laid back, in order to show the testes, as the two valves of a
cockle-shell might be in order to show the fish ; in reality, when in the body of the
living creature the two embedding-sacs are closed together, like a living cockle-shell, and
quite hide the testes, which are then on their inner surfaces. In fig. 19 one of the
embedding-sacs is shown after the testes have been removed. The embedding-sac
is somewhat folded and pressed so as to form lobes and folds, which vary in diff'erent
individuals ; it will be seen by fig. 35 that its two surfaces are usually much j)ressed
together, leaving a rather small and irregular lumen, which, however, is doubtless
506 - ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
capable of expansion. The walls of the organ are formed of columnar cells varying
greatly in size in different parts ; they only stain lightly, but have large and clear, much
flattened, oval nuclei of about 14 ^u and darkly staining nucleoli of about 5 /u.
The embedding-sac has been most frequently empty in the specimens which I have
sectioned ; but sometimes it has contained a fine granular secretion, which hardly stains
at all, but which has apparently been of a slightly viscid character. I have never
detected spermatozoa in it ; but it is just possible that if the secretion enveloped the
spermatozoa and were impervious to stain, the spermatozoa might be present and not be
visible, although this does not seem very probable. It is a very strange thing that I
have not been able to detect any entrance to or exit from the embedding-sac either
forming a connection with the testes or any other organ ; it appears to be a closed sac,,
but it is difficult to believe that it always is so.
The embedding of the true testes in the external wall of a hollow mass is very like
the arrangement in the Oribatidge*. In these Acari the embedding-organ serves as a
vesicula seminalis. Perhaps, however, of all published delineations of the genital organs
of Acari, that by Prof. Berlese of a sagittal section of Actinecla corniger (i. prostigmata,.
pi. vii.) comes nearest to the testis and embedding-sac of Bdella Basteri. Berlese does
not say a word about the genital organs of his creature in the letterpress ; but, curiously
enough, he has mistaken the male for the female, and in the explanation of his plate he
marks the embedding-sac as being the ovary, and apparently considers the testis, which
he draws very well, to be an egg ; he shows a communication ti-om the embedding-sac
into the penial canal, which he calls the " plicae vulvares, or labia interna."
The nearly full-grown nymph of Bdella Basteri shows, as before stated, the testes
well developed, but the creature does not possess any embedding-sac; that seems to be
developed in the adult only ; and moreover, strange as it may appear, it is a fact that I
have been unable to trace any sign ot an embedding-sac even in the adults of any ot the
other species of Bdella, three or four in number, which I have been able to examine.
The true testes in these species come right down to the ventral surface.
Tlie TestlciUar Bridge (figs. 17, 20, 34, tb) is so much a portion of the testes that it
might perhaps have been more correctly described immediately after them ; but its exact
position woiild not be so well understood before the description of the manner in which
the testes of B. Basteri are partially sunk in the embedding-sac.
The bridge is a tubular connection between the two testes on one side of the body and
the corresponding joair on the other side ; it would not be useful to attempt to give its
exact size, because it varies so much according to the amount of spermatic matter in its
lumen for the moment and from other causes. It has already been mentioned that the
two short ducts from the two testes on one side unite in a common duct which enters
the end of the bridge; this common duct is so intimately connected with the bridge that
it must be regarded as the commencement of that structure. The bridge curves round
immediately behind the penial canal and, in B. Basteri, is between that organ and the
lower part of the anterior edges of the embedding-sac ; but it is quite free from both ; is
* ' iJritish Oribatidtc,' Michael (Eay Soc. 1884), p. 150, pi. F. figs. 1-5.
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 507
not in any way sunk in tlie embedding-sac or joined to tlie penial canal, althongli in
ripe specimens all the organs become pressed against those adjoining them from the
immense development of tlie genitalia. It forms a passage for the spermatozoa from
the testes on each side of the body, and in specimens containing ripe spermatozoa it is
usually crowded with the ripest of them. From this one Avould naturally anticipate that
there would be some passage from the bridge into the penial canal, which it immediately
adjoins; but, strange to say, this is just what I have been entirely unable to find by any
amount of searching ; there does not seem to be any enti-ance from it into the penial
canal, and I think I may say positively that there was not any such entrance in aay
specimen which I have examined.
The testicular bridge is probably the homologue of the short junction or bridge
between the testicular masses on the two sides of the body found in Thijas petropJdlus
(14. p. 193, fig. 17), although the situation is very different; the bridge in Thyas
being at the extreme posterior of the testicular masses, whereas that of Bdclla is central.
There is a kind of progression from the almost horseshoe-shaped testicular mass of
Tromhidimn fuUginosnm (6. fig. 17) to that of Thyas, above referred to, where,
although tlie liorseshoe form is more or less preserved, the two sides are almost
separated ; and fiu-ther to the organs of BdeUa, where the two sides are wholly separated
posteriorly and only joined by a central bridge.
The histology of the bridge does not vary much from that of the testes ; the same
layer of darkly staining, clearly-nucleated cells which forms the exterior tunic of the
latter extends continuously over the former, and when the genital products are not
fully developed constitutes the principal thickness of the organ, the lumen being small.
At a later stage the lumen is greatly distended by the spermatic products, and the walls
of the organ become thinner; there is never any sign, liowever, of the cells of the
bridge becoming sperm-mother-cells, or of their giving rise to spermatozoa.
The Mucous Glauds {glandulce mucosa-) (figs 17, 31 & 36, gm, & 37), as I call them,
for the purpose of not binding myself to homologies, are almost, if not quite, the largest
organs in the body of the adult male Bdella. The form of each is that of a great
sausage-shaped sac bent upon itself in the middle, so that the two ends almost touch,
and the two halves also almost touch at their inner edges and are parallel to each other;
the great curved central bend is at the anterior portion of the organ, the ends being
directed backward (fig. 36). The bend is not horizontal but perpendicular, so that the
one half of the organ lies above, not at the side of the other ; the end which, as herein-
after explained, comimmicates with the testiciUar bridge is the lower, and is usually
more or less swollen and irregular in form, while shortly before the swelling there is a
slight constriction. The walls of the organ are extremely thick ; they are composed of a
substantial tunica propria externally ; on the inner side of this a single row of large, more
or less columnar, somewhat irregular cells, varying in B. Bastcrl from about "06 mm. to
about -1 mm. in length and about 15 f* to 25 ^ in width, which have extremely dense
dark-staining walls where they adjoin each other, l. e. on their sides, and much thinner
walls at the ends. The exterior end of the cell is filled with a layer or mass of protoplasm
about -02 to -03 mm. thick on the average, which stains freely and contains the strongly
508 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
marked, usually nearly circular nucleus, wliicli averages about 10 ^ and has a large
distinct nucleolus of about 5 ^ to 6 /.i. The remainder of the cell is either entirely or partly
filled with a finely granular secretion, whicli shows the largest granules near the exterior
of the cell, bvit in the lumen of the organ becomes very homogeneous, and which stains
but slightly ; or else is completely empty; the latter is the commonest condition. I say
very homogeneous in the lumen, but of coxxrse a sufficient power shows this secretion to
be granular even there, but as the granules are not above i n in diameter and extremely
hyaline, it requires a comparatively high power of the microscope and some definition to
see them clearly. What apparently takes place is that when the secretion is formed the wall
of the inner end of the cell breaks down and the contents are discharged into the lumen of
the organ, which is often quite full of it, although at other times empty. After the wall
of the inner end of the cell has broken down and discharged its contents the other walls
persist, forming deep pockets, so that the whole strvxcture looks like an almost empty
honeycomb ; into these pockets the secretion continues to be discharged and to find its
way thence into the lumen.
These organs do not vary much in the other species of Bdella which I have been able
to examine ; the principle and histology have always been the same; the chief difference
which I have found has been that in some species, particularly the smaller ones, the
organ is often thicker (i. e., has a larger diameter) in proportion to its length, and that
the two parallel portions are consequently shorter and are more pressed against each
other ; the result of this is that the whole mass, even in section, looks more globular. In
some sj)ecies, e. g. B. vulgaris, it would be possible for a person seeing only the section
to overlook the fact of its being a sausage-shaped organ folded on itself, and to take it
for a globular one, if he had not seen B. Basteri or some other similar species to guide
him to the true form ; of course a careful examination would reveal the true conformation
of the organ in any species.
There are two passages, and two only, ovit of, or into, each mucous gland ; these are at
the two ends. In the upper more rounded end, but not median in that end, there is a
very small but perfectly distinct entrance to the glandular antechamber (vestibulum
glandulae mucosai) (fig. 19, v(j), Avhich entrance is ordinarily kept closed by the thick
walls of the antechamber itself being pressed against one another. About the centre
of the lower more lobose end is a much smaller passage ordinarily very tightly closed
by a sphincter, which leads into the testicular bridge. Hound this passage a few cells of
the mucous gland have usually entirely broken down, their latei'al walls even being
destroyed ; thus an open space is left, \\ hich is generally wholly or partially filled Avith
the secretion, unless the lumen of the organ be empty.
The Glandular Antechambers {vestibulum (jlandiilm mucosa;) (figs. 20, 36, 38, vg, & 17,
18, & 41) are two paired chambers, one leading from the upper end of each of the great
mucous glands into the head of the penial canal : each antechamber is almost in a line with
the part of the mucous gland Irom which it springs, but turns slightly upward to reach the
dorsal side of the head of the penial canal and to escape the edge of the testis; it is sharply
divided from the uiucous gland by the constriction which forms the narrow passage before
mentioned, and from the penial canal by a similar constriction ; so that it becomes an
INTEENAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 509^
oval sac, which lias extremely thick walls and a small lumen. The greatest length of
the organ in B. Bastevl is usually about "2 mm.
The histology of the organ bears a resemblance to that of the mucous glands, yet tlie
differences are considerable. The tunica propria is present, but is not nearly so easily
seen as in the mucous glands, because the cell-contents and walls in the antechamher
hardly stain at all, and therefore do not dilferentiate. The walls are composed of
columnar cells radiating inward, and in B. Basteri mostly about -04 mm. in length ;
but in tliat species they are very irregular in arrangement (fig. 38). In some other
species, e. g. B. vulgmHS, they are remarkably regular, and the walls of the cells strong
(fig. 41). The cell-contents are very compact and the nuclei extremely small,
flattened, and indistinct ; indeed it would be difiicult to see them were it not for tho
minute darkly staining nucleoli. In some specimens it will be found that the cells are
empty and the nuclei gone, but the lateral walls of the cells still persist, forming a
strong oj)en houeycomb-like reticulum.
The secretion within the lumen of the antechamber is similar to that foimd in the
mucous gland, and probahly conies thence.
The Benial Canal (figs. 18, 21, 34, 42, ^jc, including pc^ and -pc^) is a very
complicated organ, and one not at all easy fully to grasp the construction of; it
varies considerably in detail in different species ; it must probably be considered a
development of a ductus ejacidatorius. When looked at from the exterior this
complication is not seen ; it then appears to be, and its external coating is, a large organ
divided into two parts (fig. 18), an inner fleshy portion {pc^), and an outer membranous
portion (^J6*-). The former of these is almost perpendicidar or tends somewhat
backward, varying in different specimens, the dorsal end being the more anterior ; it is
an approach to jj^-ramidal in form, but is curved, the dorsal end curving over toward
the posterior end of the creature ; it also enlarges gradually, but not regularly, from the
dorsal to the ventral end. It is round, or Jilmost so, in transverse section cut through
its dorsal part ; more compressed laterally in its lower part. In some other species, e. g.
B. vulgaris, the dorsal end of the penial canal is enlarged and is more turned to the
rear. On the exterior of tliis organ near its lower edge is placed on each side a
chitinous sclerite (as), which I will call the "amphioid sclerite " *, the anterior half of
which is a plate of irregular form somewhat convex exteriorly, so that it looks semi-
arcuate in longitudinal section ; this plate has a pointed anterior end, where it ajjproxi-
mates to its fellow of the opposite side. The posterior half turns in a sigmoid
manner, and is thicker and rod-like ; its hind end almost touches the tube which leads
from the outer membranous chamber of the penial canal into the air-chamber on that
side of the body. The anterior plate-like half of this amphioid sclerite is bordered by
4 or 5 spines ; its principal function appears to be to give attachment to muscles,
although it probably is also protective ; from it spring the muscles (mdl) which
divaricate the labia that close the entrance from the azygous accessory gland
(gaa) to the penial canal. From the posterior dorsal angle of the plate arises a thick
tendinous projection, and into the end of this a pair of large retractor muscles {mr)
* 'A/^Kfii, both ; €Uos, shape.
SECOND SEMES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 69
510 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
are inserted. From the posterior edge of the plate arises a series of fine constrictor
muscles (mc), which pass round the outside of the penial canal. The other principal
muscles connected with this part of the canal are a pair of central retractor muscles
(mr^) inserted into the median posterior line of the lower part of the organ, and a
network of constrictor muscles which completely envelop the upper end of the organ
like a cap ; these are not shown in the drawing, as they would entirely hide that portion
of the canal. The glandular antechamhers (vg) enter the upper end of the jienial
canal as hefore stated, passing through this muscular layer. The outer portion of the
l^enial canal (pc~) lies entirely ventral to the amphioid sclerite, and is a membranous
structure somewhat wider than the inner portion (pc^), hut its exact Avidth and form
depend on the amount of the retraction of the organ for the moment. It forms a thin-
walled flexible chamber connecting the inner part of the penial canal with the great
external labia (/<?).
The penial canal presents internally a complicated series of folds of a thin flexible
membrane, which is marked in most parts by a very fine series of parallel, wavy, linear
ridges, projecting considerably in parts ; in other places the membrane is provided with
very fine spines or hairs, some of which form two paired brushes (fig. 21, bh). When
sections taken through the edge of the external genital aperture are carefully examined,
it will be seen that this membrane is really an invagination of the exterior cuticle of
the body, and retains its character of the wavy parallel ridges ; but both membrane
and ridges have become very much finer and more delicate than on the exterior
of the creature. It would be hopeless to describe or even to draw the whole of
the complicated series of folds into which this membrane is thrown, nor are they by
any means always similar in different specimens ; but the main features are generally
preserved, and something of them may be gathered from the figures and something
respecting them may be said here. First, the membrane folds so as to divide the
upper end of the penial canal, which is enlarged in some species, into three lobes or
chambers communicating and forming a kind of trefoil ; below this the membrane folds
in and forms a very narrow constriction ; below this again it appears to be invaginated
more than once, and to form various folds and recesses ; but if it be looked at from
behind after its outer walls have been cut open and separated, it will be seen that there
is an arrangement in the central line which is depicted in figs. 21, 34 ; there is a longish,
very hyaline, and thin-walled central tube, which is slightly sigmoid in form, but looks
straight when seen from the front or rear, down the middle of the exterior of which
tube sometimes runs a slight ridge, the thickness of which varies in different j)arts ; this
ridge, when present, is a mere folding together of the two sides of the tube when it is
slightly flattened. The lower end of the tube is strengthened by two very small, paired,
chitinous, slightly undulated rods, each of which supports a small rounded membranous
flap or lobe (mfp) marked with wavy ridges ; each of these flaps ap^iears a mere line
when looked at from the anterior, but like a rounded lobe when seen from the side;
each flap bears a well-developed chitinous hook, standing slightly upward. Between
these rods is a funnel-shaped piece {jie), very slightly chitinized at its open enlarged
end, which is the upjier, but hyaline at its smaller end, which is tubular. I have
never had the good fortune to obtain Bclella iu copula, or with the j^enial
INTEENAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 511
arrangements extruded; hut I believe that hy the action of its exterior constrictor
muscles the inner membranous parts of the penial canal can be evaginated and extruded,
and that then the above-mentioned memhi'anous tube would form its distal termination,
and that the organ {pe) would in some way function as a penis— either forming a true
intromittent organ, in spite of its hj aline nature, by passing between the large and
widely open external labia of the female genital aperture, or else depositing the spermatic
elements on the exterior of that opening, — and that the two hooks on the membranous
terminal flaps wovild serve to hold it temporarily in position.
The outer wall of the penial canal is, except at th^ lower edge, detached fro:n the
inner membrane ; it is mu.ch thicker, and consists of a tunic not showing any distinct
cellulation, but thickly strewn with small very darkly staining dots, which apparently
are not nuclei.
The Azi/(jous Accessory Glainl (figs. 17, 18, 19, 34, 41, (/cm) is unquestionably the
homologue of Henkin's accessory sac (Anhangschlauch) in Trombidlnm fullglnosum,
which organ it greatly resembles, altliough the form in B. Basterl is somewhat more
complicated. Pagenstecher had seen and drawn it previously, but having mistaken the
male for the female, he described it as a spermatheca : Henkiu correctly suggests that
it is in the nature of a prostate gland ; it certainly is an accessory gland of some sort.
The form in Henkin's species is that of a long, thinnish, convoluted tube with an almost
globular enlargement at the distal end, and usually a slight swelling, of varying form and
position, somewhere near the middle of the tube. In B. Bastcri (figs. 17, 19) it divides
into two regions : the whole organ is compressed laterally, so that it appears much
narrower -when looked at from above or below than when seen from the side ; viewed in
the latter direction its distal end is expanded and approaches a discoidal form, but is of
much smaller proportion than the globular ending of Trombidmm fuliginosum ; it then
becomes a flat bar with almost parallel edges of considerably less width than the disc,
and continues so for about twice the diameter of the disc ; it then suddenly turns almost
at a right angle and again enlarges, forming a shortly pyriform, or almost discoidal
swelUng, much larger than the first ; this completes one region, the whole of which is
practically colourless. At this point the organ is suddenly constricted ; it quickly
enlarges again, but not to its former size ; it then gradually diminishes once more
until it becomes quite a small tube, in which condition it enters the anterior side of the
penial canal near the exterior termination of that organ, or at all events neai-er to the
exterior genital opening than the entrance of the duct from any other gland into the
penial canal is. The whole of this second region is yellow-red or orange in B. Basteri.
There is not any long convoluted tube as in Trombidium fuliginosum. The entrance of
this duct into the canal is closed l)y two closely approximated lips (figs. 18, 41), which
can be separated by muscles (^mdl) arising from the amphioid sclerites {as), as mentioned
in the description of the penial canal.
In Bdella vulgaris the form is very difi'erent; there the thin tube exists, although it
is not nearly as long as in Henkin's species, indeed it is quite a short duct of small
diameter ; but it swells out at its distal end, forming a great crescentic organ, much
larger in proportion than the gland in the other two species named ; in all, however, the
form of the organ varies a good deal, although each species maintains its own type.
69*
512 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
The duct in J3. vulgaris does not come from the centre of the crescent, but from neai'er
the anterior end, and on the concave side of the crescent.
The organ has a substantial tunica propria, within which, in the first described {i. e.,
the distal) region of the organ, is a single layer of columnar cells, wliich are slightly
larger at their outer flattened than their inner rounded ends : in the largest part of the
organ in B. Basteri the cells measure about '06 mm. in length, have almost round
nuclei of about 5/i to 6/i placed near the outer ends of the cells, and clear darkly staining
nucleoli of under 2^t. With the exception of the niicleoli the orgaa only stains lightly.
In the first region the principal contents of the cells is extremely fine granular matter.
In the second, proximal, region of the organ the columnar cells, although still existing,
are less distinct and much more irregular; their inner ends are not rounded, but the
nuclei and nucleoli are still equally distinct ; this portion of the organ appears to be
lined with a distinct, somewhat loose, membrane, and the cell-contents are less granular,
more reticulate, and coarser. The histology of this organ is very similar to that of the
embedding-sacs.
The Laminated Gland (figs. 18, 19,^/, & 17, 23, 39).— This gland (if it be a gland) may
be the homologue of Henkin's bursa expulsatoria in Trombidmm fuUginosum. I think,
however, that it may be safely said that it does not function as a bursa exjiulsatoria in
Bdella ; it arises from the penial canal near to the position where Henkin's organ
arises, although not in the identical place ; it may probably be regarded as an azygous
saccular out-jDushing of the penial canal which has come to possess thick walls and a
most special structure; it is, however, entirely devoid of the well-developed outer layer
of muscles which Henkin describes as surrounding his bursa. The essential difi"erence
in position of the organs in Henkin's Trombidium and in Bdella is that in the former
Henkin draws and describes his bursa and the duct from the azygous accessory gland as
entering the jienial canal on opposite sides of that organ, whereas in Bdella they enter on
the same side close together. There cannot be any reasonable doubt that the azygous
accessory gland of the one creature is the homologue of that in the other; but it is
necessary to consider whether it is the position of the bursa in Trombidium that is
different in position from the laminated gland of Bdella, or whether it is the duct from
the azygous gland that differs. The laminated gland of Bdella enters the anterior side
of the penial canal. Henkin says that the bursa of his species enters the " upperside,"
treating the penial canal as being more horizontal than it is in Bdella ; it slopes some-
what in both, but is more perpendicular in Bdella. I have examined Henkin's species,
and it seems to me that the upperside would l)e the anterior if the canal were raised into
a perpendicular line, and that therefore the position of the bursa in Henkin's species is
not far from that of the laminated gland in mine, and therefore that it must be the
entrance of the duct from the azygous gland Avhich is different in the two creatures.
I have called this organ the laminated gland on account of the apj)earance (fig. 39) in
section of being provided inside with a close series of lamellte projecting into the lumen;
it will, however, be seen below that this would not be an exhaustive or wholly correct
description of the internal structure.
The laminated gland in Bdella Basteri is a sac of nearly even diameter throughout,
butAvith a convex, distal, blind end ; it is slightly curved longitudinally, but is circular in
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 5lS
transverse section. It is invested by a loose, outer coat of mucus-like substance, bearing
little groups of darkly staining dots irregularly scattered ; within this it has a thick,
dense tunic which is irregular in surface ; the interior is provided with what in longi-
tudinal section (fig. 39) appear to be a series of fine crinkled lamella3, which are fixed by
their outer edges to the inner side of the wall of tlie gland and project far into the
lumen, only leaving about one-third in the middle free; these appai"ent lamellae are
about 1 n thick and about 5 ,u apart — their projection into the lumen is about "02 to
"03 mm. If, however, a transverse section, or, indeed, even a horizontal one of the gland
be cut, these apparent Itimcllse will still be found presenting an almost similar appearance
of being parallel laniellte on edge projecting into the lumen. The explanation of this is
that if they are to be regarded as lamellfe perpendicular to the length of the organ then
they are joined by numerous short lamella3, slightly thinner than the principal ones and
running obliquely at various angles; probably, however, they are rather to be regarded
as a closely-packed mass of long columnar cells, of very small diameter, and of somewhat
singular and irregular form, being triangular, rhomboid, or pentagonal in section, but
oftenest triangular, and which are never, in any specimens which I have seen, closed
at the inner ends, neither ha\^e I ever detected any nuclei to these cells, if cells they be,
nor any cell-contents ; the walls only persist, and this although I have examined numerous
specimens of various species caught at almost all times of year (except mid-winter, when
I cannot get any) and of various ages.
When the gland is cut open, and the open ends of these cells, if cells they be, are looked
at from wdthin, they present the irregular reticulated appearance shown at fig. 23 ; if
the microscope be focussed a little within the mouths of the cells then a singular
appearance is obtained, very like the well-known tissue of the rush composed of stellate
cells ; of course this can only be an accidental resemblance produced by crossing or
sloping lines.
The central lumen, beyond the lamellae, is often, but not always, filled with a quantity
of secretion very similar in appearance to that of the great mucous glands ; in hai*dened
specimens it is often a rod-like nmss, and occasionally shows on the exterior of the rod
casts of the parts of the inside of tlie cells which abut on the lumen of the organ, as if
the secretion had been pressed into the mouths of the cells. It is possible that this
matter has entered the gland from the exterior and is not secreted, in which case the
organ would not be a gland at all ; the very dense character of the wall looks a little like
it, but I do not think it probable, particularly as there are not any constrictor muscles
wdiich would enable the organ to act for expulsory purposes.
The Air-chambers. — These organs (figs. 18, 22, acg) arc two paired organs, one on each
side of the body, which vary considerably in form in different specimens and species.
They are far more developed in B. Basteri than in any other species which I have
examined ; in that creature each one is a chamber of somewhat irregular form, round in
transverse section, but much longer than the diameter ; it averages somewhere about
•15 mm. long and about '05 mm. to -08 mm. in diameter, according to what part is
measured, for the organ is considerably thicker at one end than the other. The whole
organ is lined by, indeed it would be almost correct to say formed by, a strong chitinous
intima, which, however, is transparent and only slightly brownish in colour; it is not
514 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
smooth, but its outer surface rises in a series of" small irregular convexities; where two-
convexities meet at their edges they form a short point directed inward, and from eacli
of these points a strong spine projects far into tlie chamber ; all these spines are centri-
petal, pointing toward the middle of the chamber.
Each air-chamber is (in B. Basteri) almost entirely sunk in the fleshy wall of the
erabeddiug-sac on that side of the body, only a short portion of the smaller end of the
air-chamber projecting from the embeddiug-sac ; part of the larger rounded end of the
chamber occasionally projects a little into the lumen of the embedding-sac. The air-
chamber does not j)enetrate the wall of the embedding-sac at right angles, but in an
oblique direction, so that its length lies more parallel to the surface of the embedding-
sac than perj)eudicular to it. In the other species of Bdella which I have examined
there are not any embedding-sacs, and therefore the air-chambers cannot be sunk in
them ; but in Bdella capillata, Kramer *, the air-chamber, although very much smaller
proportionately tliau iu B. Basteri, and standing free without being sunk in anything, is
otherwise a similar organ to that in B. Basteri. In B. vulgaris the organ exists but is
far more rudimentary, being merely a fold of flexible membrane, forming a small
chamber without spines.
In B. Basteri a narrow passage, very strongly chitinized on one side, less so on the
other {acp), leads out of the anterior side of the air-chamber, about one-thii-d or one-
quarter of its length from the smaller end ; this passage communicates with the j)ortion
of the penial canal ventral to the amphioid sclerite — that is to say, with the outer fold
of the penial canal immediately adjoining the external labia of the genital aperture.
No solid contents are ever found in the air-chamber ; but if a living or freshly-kiUed
specimen be sunk in glycerine and examined immediately it will always be seen that
these chambers are filled with air.
The only analogy or homology which I can suggest for these organs is a possible one
to the curious so-called " ram's-horn organs " found beneath the genital operculum in
Chelifer ca)wroides and other forms.
The External Labia of the Genital Opeuing. — These organs (figs. 18, 19, 34, le) are large,
rounded, fleshy labia with a longitudinal opening, and form an almost hemispherical
projection on the ventral surface of the creature ; they have considerable thickness, and
where they meet in the median line each has a perfectly flat and smooth, somewhat
chitinized edge ; forming, in fact, a curved chitiuous plate on edge : these two plates lie
against each other so closely that it is often difficult to see the separation in sections ; the
labia, however, are easily separated with a hair, and then by pushing them open the flat
edge becomes ventral. Each labium is bordered by a row of hairs.
The Spermatozoa. — These, when forming in the testes, are minute, almost spherical
* My specimens agree uxactly with Kramer's description of his BdeUa ciq/dlata (13); they do not, however,
(luite agree with the description and figures which Berle8e(i) gives of what he considers to be this species. In
Kramer's description the second joint ol the palpus is rather longer than the fifth, and the proportion of the third to
the fourth joint is as 4 to 7. In Bcrlese's the fifth joint is longer than the second, and the third than the fourth,
and there are too many hairs on the fifth joint for Kramer's description. In all these points my specimens agree
■with Kramer's.
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 515
bodies, which gradually become more elongated ; those in and neai' to the testicular
bridge have become more or less filamentous, and have a tendency to a slight head, which
stains more deeply than the rest of the spermatozoon. These spermatozoa in and near
the testicular bridge always seem to nic to be somewhat larger than those anywhere else,
even in the penial canal.
The Course of the Spermatozoa from the Testes to the Exterior and the Functions of the
different Parts of the System. — The course of tlie spermatozoa is difficidt to trace satis-
factorily : to summarize the facts bearing upon it, the two testes on each side have very
short vasa effereutia Avhich unite to form a very short common duct ; the two common
ducts, one on each side of the body, are joined by the tubular and very elastic testicular
bridge ; this bridge and the common ducts are usually crowded with spermatozoa in their
largest and ripest condition. Tlie bridge curves round the back of the head of the penial
canal, and we should naturally expect that there would be a connection between the two ;
if there were, the course of the spermatozoa would be simple enough ; but I have
never been able to trace any such communication, although I have sought for it
assiduously in dissection and in sections cut in all directions of several species of Bdella ;
the two organs, although closely approximated, alw'ays seem entirely separate and
without communication. How then do the spermatozoa escape ? Apparently there is
one mode and one only ; and that is a very small tubular passage leading from the point
where the common duct joins the bridge, on each side of the body, to the distal end of
the great mucous gland on that side ; here it is firmly closed by a constrictor muscle ;
on the other side of the constriction is the lumen of the mucous gland. Spermatozoa
swarm on the testes and bridge side up to the constriction, but I have never been
able to detect one in the mucous gland on the other side of the constriction. The
mucous gland discharges into the glandular antechamber, and that discharges into the
head of the penial canal. If the spermatozoa come through the mucous glands and
glandular antechambers into the penial canal the course is easily understood ; but although
they occur in great quantities in the bridge and common ducts, and up to the entrance to
the mucous glands, and are also abundant in the jienial canal, yet I never could detect one
in the mucous glands or glandular antechambers. How comes this if they be the
channels, and the only channels, of communication ? One possible explanation is that
I have never obtained Bdella at the moment of coition and that the spermatozoa
pass rapidly through into the penial canal ; but the chambers of the mucous glands,
when the cells have opened, seem well fitted to retain them. Another possible
explanation is that the secretion of the mucous glands does not stain, wdiich is a fact,
and that the spermatozoa become so enveloped in it that they are protected from staining
while in the mucous glands and antechambers ; but one would have expected in that
case that the secretion would have still covered them when they were passed into the
penial canal, but they stain there freely enough. If the spermatozoa pass through the
mucous glands and antechambers then these are the vasa deferentia ; and this view is
rendered very probable by the fact that in Trombklinm the vasa deferentia do actually
discharge into the head of the penial canal in the precise placa where the antechambers
of Bdella enter. On the other hand, the vasa deferentia in Acari are usually small
516 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
organs, and I do not know any instance of their being glandular ; the mucous glands of
Bdella are some of the largest organs in the body. The histology of the mucous glands
is essentially that of the accessory glands of the male genital system in many other
Acari, e. g. Gamasus, the large thick-walled cells immediately striking the observer
as similar ; but the accessory glands of other Acari are always separate organs, ending
lilindly and discharging by ducts ; and the discharge of spermatozoa through such glands
seems 2^rr>na fcfcie to be improbable. I have been very unwilling to accept it as the true
explanation ; it has even struck me whether it were possible that at some time of year
which I have missed, or ixnder some circumstances, the testicular bridge does com-
municate with the penial canal, and whether in that case it might be possible that the
mucous gland not only discharged its principal contents, as it certainly does, through
the antechamber into the penial canal, but also discharged some portion through the
narrow constricted aperture into the common duct and bridge, where it served to nourish
the spermatozoa, which appear so much better nourished in this place than anywhere
else. I have not, however, been able to discover any sufficient evidence in favour of such
a theory, and it is not by any means a theory to be accepted without evidence, as a
gland discharging at both ends to different organs is not a thing which could be
anticipated.
The head of the penial canal is enveloped by a thick cap of muscles spanning it in all
directions ; these doubtless are the ejaculatory muscles, and, probably, serve also to
extrude the invaginated parts of the canal. What can be the office of the embedding-
sac in £. Basteri, and what is the necessity for the number, variety, and immense size of
the accessory glands in all species of Bdella it is very difficult to understand.
The Female. (Figs. 24, 25, 43, 44.)
In marked contrast to the extreme complication of the generative organs of the male-
Bdella, those of the female are particularly simple, and we do not find a single accessory
gland present to take the place of the numerous organs of that nature which are present
in the male.
Practically it is only in young specimens that these organs can be studied ; when the
eggs are matured they fill the abdomen so miich that they push everything else out of
position ; and if the genital organs be dissected out they are a mere lump of eggs which
hide everything, and have distended some parts out of all shape, while sections at this
time do not reveal much more.
The organs of the female consist of: (1) the ovary ; (2) the oviduct; (3) the recep-
taculum seminis ; (4) the external labia.
The Ovary (figs. 24, 25). — This organ is a considerable variation from all homologous
organs hitherto described in the Trombidlnm-gvow]) of Acarina (vide Heukin (6), Michael
(14), Schaub (18)) ; in all these recorded instances the ovary has been almost ring-shaped
and flattened, the paired oviducts completing the ring. In Bdella the ovary is a mere
crescentic lump, which in the virgin female is quite small, but of course provided
with ovarian ova ; the crescent is a short and slightly ciu'ved one (fig. 25, ov). As the
INTEENAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 517
creature gets a little older the crescent becomes somewhat deeper, more approaching a
horseshoe form (fig. 24, ov) ; but after impregnation, and when the ova are mature, the
Avhole becomes one shapeless mass of large eggs A\hich enclose and hide the oviduct. The
ova are formed and more or less matured in short pedunculated oocysts, each ovum
apparently forming its own oocyst by pushing out the exterior tunic of the ovary, thus
forming a sac in which the ovum lies. Exactly how the ovum gets from the oocyst into
the oviduct is not by any means clear to me in Bdella, or, indeed, in many of the other
Acarina, although it is evident enough in the Oribatidns and most Gamasidaj.
The Oijidnct (figs. 21, 25 & 43, od, & 14). — In all described Trombidiidoe and Ilydrachnidse
there are two oviducts whicli unite to form a common tube (the vagina) ; in Bdella, how-
ever, there does not apj^ear to be any such arrangement ; in all s^^ecies which I have
examined there ajipears to be one single fleshy tube leading from the centre of the ovary to
the external labia. Some authors would probably divide this tube into oviduct, uterus,
and vagina ; in reality, however, I do not see any distinction of regions which is at all
permanent : it is one unbroken tube, in some parts a little larger, in others a little smaller,
but still the one tube, and the enlarged portions are apt to vary with age and contents.
It is only in the young specimens that this tube can be clearly seen or dissected out;
when distended by maturing or mature eggs it becomes a great irregular sac, the walls
of which have lost their extremelv thick and irlandular character to a ijreat extent. The
oviduct when in situ is not straight or perpendicular ; it is in effect rolled round the
ovary ; so that when dissected out the whole forms a rounded mass, which can be uncurled
in fresh specimens of the young female, but which it is extremely difficult to stretch out
when the eggs are mature. The ovary and oviduct of a young specimen of B. vulgaris
partly uncurled, so as to show them, are delineated at fig. 25 ; it will be seen that the
oviduct here is longish and is corrugated, showing evident signs of capability of
expansion ; at its distal end it enlarges considerably, and were this permanent it might,
perhaps, be called a uterus, but I do not see that it is so. Eeyond this enlarged portion,
i. e. between it and the external labia, is a short flexible portion of the tube, which might
be called the vagina, if that name be used at all. In B. Basterl (fig. 24) I have not
seen any such enlargement in the young female. The figure is drawn as In sltn, only a
little uncurled, but the oviduct is, I think, much shorter and thicker in pro^wrtion than
in B. vulgai-is. The external labia and membranous portion of the duct are not repeated
in this figure ; they would not vary from the other species.
The oviduct is an organ with extremely thick fleshy walls (fig. 44) (in some places as
thick as "1 mm.) and consists of an almost structureless tunica propria, within which are
usually several row s of deeply staining cells, containing a granular protoplasm and small
round nuclei (about 2>n) which do not stain much more deeply than the general cell-
contents. The AA'alls vary greatly in thickness in difi'erent parts, and according to the
amount to which the organ is distended in the particular place at the time. The cells
are extremely loose and irregular, crowded together, l)ut not so as to press strongly
against one another ; thus they have rounded and otherwise curved outlines, and are not
forced into hexagonal or other angular forms. The layers are often folded so as to
make great projections into the lumen of the duct. The outer layer of cells, adjoining
SECOND SKKIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 70
618 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
the tuuica propria, have a tendency to be columnar, but the deeper layers are more
round, the innermost being often more or less comma-shaped, with swollen ends, which
project into the lumen. The eggs lie some time in the oviduct, and develop greatly
there : yolk-division commences, and proceeds to a considerable extent, before the ova
pass into the duct ; but it is completed there, and. the egg increases in size greatly while
there ; it is in this organ also that it receives the strong chitinous covering with which
it is provided before it leaves the body of the female. The thick walls of the duct are
manifestly secretory ; in joung females, before yolk-division has commenced, the lumen
of the duct is generally full of a granular secretion, which probably is a nourishing fluid ;
it is found in more mature specimens, but then the ova so fill the duct as to allow but
little room for other things.
The Receptaculmn semlnis, or spermatheca (figs. 25, 43, rs), is an azygous sac formed by
an in-pushing of the wall of the oviduct not far from the external labia, but still not in
the flexible membranous portion of the duct which adjoins the labia; it is but slightly
seen in immature females, and sometimes not at all in very old. ones after the eggs are
all, or almost all, impregnated ; in females which have arrived at maturity only a short
time but have been impregnated, this sac is crowded with spermatozoa. It is not hard
or chitinized, but is a soft and flexible organ with its walls composed of rather columnar
cells, and its exterior in most parts covered by a layer of fine constrictor muscles.
The External Labia do not difi"er from those of the male, except in being somewhat
larger and rather more spongy in construction.
The Respiratory Organs. (Fig. 45.)
These organs have a general resemblance to the corresj)onding parts in Trombidimu,
which have been admirably and correctly figured and described by Henkin (6. fig. 7) ;
but they vary considerably from that type; they are almost similar in the different
species of Bdella which I have examined, any small points in which they do not agree
will be noticed.
In Bdella Basteri there is, on each side of the body, a long tubular air-chamber
(fig. 45, ac) which has an almost even diameter, usually of about -05 mm. throughout.
This air-chamber commences immediately behind the mandible, and continues backward
in a course which typically should be almost straight, but which generally becomes
slightly tindulating from the pressure of other organs, until it reaches the genital organs ;
it even passes among these, usually penetrating between the two arms of the great
mucous gland of the male, and between the ovary and the alimentary canal of the female.
It ends blindly both anteriorly and posteriorly ; both ends are rounded. The anterior
end is attached by a double tendinous ligament {tl) to a fold of the cuticle close to the
lower posterior corner of the mandible. At a distance from the anterior end of the air-
chamber eqvial to abovit two-thirds of the length of the air-chamber itself, there springs
from the dorsal side of the chamber a main tracheal trunk {tra), about one-third or one-
quarter the diameter of the air-chamber ; it turns sharply forward inmiediately and runs
parallel to the anterior part of the air-chamber the whole length of that organ. In the
drawing the two are slightly separated in order to show them distinctly, but in nature, when
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 519
thej are in si(n, they actually toucli along their whole length— indeed, for the greater part
of their course, they are surrounded hy a single enveloping tunic common to both. These
two vessels are striated, the air-chamher very finely and regularly, the tracheal trunk
much more coarsely and irregularly. The tracheal trunk enlarges somewhat near its
anterior end, and when it has arrived at the termination of the air-chamber it tm*ns
suddenly upward behind the mandible, forming a somewhat curved air-passage, which is
almost divided uj) into sections by partial constrictions and irregular broken semi-
partitions or laminae jn-ojecting into the lumen. At the upper end of this jiortion of the
tracheal trunk is the stigma (S), of which there is only the one pair in the body,
communicating with the small external air-chamber between the mandibles. There are
not any other tracheal trunks in the body, but from the ventral side of the posterior
thu'd of tlie air-chamber, and from the actual posterior end and a small portion of the
dorsal side of the chamber, there arise a multitude of extremely fine, unbranched, and
unstriated tracheae (^r), which are distributed to all parts of the body ; only the
commencement of them is shown in the drawing. Some of these tracheae turn forward
and serve the tropin and anterior organs, some run backward and turn forward afterwards ;
but far the greater number of them run backward toward the posterior end of the
creature. A thick fasciculus of these small tracheae tiu'ns across the body immediately
behind the supra-oesophageal ganglion of the brain, thus lying upon the sub-oesophageal
ganglion and upon the oesophagus itself. The fasciculi from the two sides of the body
meet and cross behind the supra-oesophageal ganglion, the posterior side of which is almost
hidden by them until they are removed. In Bdella capilluta, Kramer, which I examined,
the arrangement is similar, except that the number of fine tracheae is very much less
than in B. Basteri, and that the tracheal trunk does not enlarge until it turns ujjward ;
but then it enlarges comparatively more than in B. Basteri.
The Dermaiv Glands. (Fig. 10.)
Instead of assuming the importance which the similar organs do in the Hydi'achnidae,
the dermal glands of Bdella are apparently few in number (I have only traced one pair)
and are extremely small and difficult to find ; when found, however, they bear a
resemblance to those of the Water-Mites, but on a very much smaller scale, and are
simpler. In B. Basteri they consist of minute sacs, averaging about 25 ^i in extreme
length, placed immediately beneath the hypoderm, each having one small duct placed
excentrically, which passes to the outer surface of the cuticle, where its mouth forms a
very small pore which is not protected hy any sj)ecial hair or spine, l)ut which is doubtless
sheltered by the sharp wavy ridges with which the whole cuticle of Bdella is covered.
The contents of the sac are a few masses of protoplasm which stain freely, and which are
joined by irregular protojilasmic strands. It is possible that they may not be homologous
with the dermal srlands of the Hvdrachnidse.
a'
The Endosternite.
I have not figured this organ because it is of the type well known in the Acariua,
e. g. the Gamasidae and other forms ; but I mention its existence, particularly as it is
70*
520 :MR. a. D. MICHAEL ON THE
extremely well developed in Bdella. It forms a thick tendinous plate, which, in
B. vulgaris, shows signs of being formed by the compression of a sac ; at all events, it
has thick upper and under walls, which in a transverse section of the creature show a
narrow but distinct lumen between them ; which, however, is crossed by " ties " between
the upper and under walls. The endosternite lies between the ventriculus, which is
above it, and the hind part of the brain (not quite its posterior end), which is below it.
It forms a point of attachment for numerous muscles, principally the great muscles
of the legs, which are tlie largest in the body. The endosternite is slung from above
by dorso-ventral muscles and muscles from the lateral surface of the body, and by
connective tissue ; the muscles converge to it from all sides.
The Musculature.
A large number of the muscles have been described in connection with the various
organs ; I do not propose to enter into any exhaustive desci'ij)tion of the remaining ones,
particularly as some of them are figured by Karpelles ; but there are some which I may
mention. I have not draAvn any of the musculature except that incidental to other
figures, because doing so would have involved having another plate. All the muscles
described below are paired muscles corresponding on the two sides of the body.
LonyitucUnal 3fuscles. — From the dorsal cuticle nearly above the fourth leg, and
almost close to the hind fasciculus of dorso-ventral muscles, two bundles of powerful
muscles arise ; both of these are horizontal muscles running for their whole length almost
immediately under tlie dorsal cuticle. The anterior of these bundles runs forward above
the alimentary canal and the paired salivary glands ; it spreads out and is inserted partly
in the dorsal cuticle about where the dorsum begins to sink toward the rostrum, partly
in the upper proximal edges of the mandible, and partly in the cuticle behind the lower
proximal edge of the mandible The other bundle runs backward, and is inserted in the
dorsal cuticle near the posterior end of the hoAj ; thus these two sets of horizontal
muscles, starting from one point, embrace between them almost the entire length of the
body, except the rostrum. They manifestly serve to compress and shorten the body
longitudinally and to retract the rostrum.
Prom the dorsal cuticle just in front of the ventriculus two fasciculi of numerous
muscles, much sligliter than those last described, arise ; one of these is inserted in the
rostrum just below and behind the mandible, the other in the cuticle just above and
behind the mandible.
From the anterior end of the endosternite a fasciculus of strong muscles runs to and is
inserted in the lower posterior edge of the rostrum near the median line.
Perpendicular Muscles. — I was able to distingviish eight fasciculi of dorso-ventral
muscles, all strongish, viz. : —
1. A fasciculus arising from the dorsal cuticle in front of the reniform and pericibal
salivary glands, and not very far from the median line of the body ; this bundle is
inclined slightly forward, and is inserted in the hind edge of the rostrum.
2. A fasciculus arising from the same place, but passing almost perpendicularly down-
ward and inserted into the ventral cuticle.
INTERNAL AXATOMY OF BDELLA. 521
3. A fasciculus arising from the dorsum a little in fi-ont of the auterior eye, rather
more toward the side of the l)ody than numbers 1 and 2, and inserted in the ventral
thickened sclei'ite or ridge at the jiosterior edge of tlie aeetal)ulum of the first leg.
4. A fasciculus arising from tlie dorsum a little beliind the posterior eye, and inserted
in a similar manner to No. 3 at the posterior edge of the acetabulum of the second leg.
5. A fasciculus close to the side of the body arising from the dorsum a little behind
the vertical plane of the coxa of the second leg; passing diagonally backward and down-
ward and inserted in the ventral surface a little before the third leg.
6. A fasciculus arising from the dorsum just anterior to the genital organs, i. e., just
anterior to the great mucous glands of the male, passing almost perpendicularly down-
ward and inserted in the ventral cuticle.
7. A fasciculus arising from the dorsum a little anterior to the embedding-sac in
£. Basteri, and in a corresponding position in the body of such species as have not
any embedding-sac, and inserted in the posterior edge of the acetabulum of the
foiu'th leg.
8. A fasciculus near the side of the body arising from the dorsum about the middle of
the embedding-sac, but outside that organ, and inserted in the ventral cuticle some little
distance posterior to the fourth leg.
There is also a fasciculus of rather fine muscles arising from the dorsum and inserted
in the anterior part of the endosternite, and another of stronger muscles arising from the
dorsum and inserted near the posterior termination of the endosternite.
The Muscles of the Mai/ d ib I es.— The muscles which move the small terminal joint of
the mandible, i. e. the movable joint of the chela, are shortish ; they are wholly contained
in the bulbous proximal part of the mandible, and are inserted into the terminal joint by
means of very long tendons passing the whole length of the narrow distal part of the
mandible. The retractor muscles, which serve to open the chela, are few and arise from
the roof of the mandible; the extensors, which close the chela, are more numerous and
more powerful ; they arise from the lower a,nd outer sides of the mandible. The teudou.s
from each set of muscles unite with their fellows of the same set, and form a single tendon
which is inserted as stated above.
The levator muscles of the whole mandible appear to be a group of short, thick,
diagonal muscles arising from and just behind the lower posterior edge of the mandible
and inserted into its i;pper posterior edge, which bends shari^ly but diagonally upward,
and extends further backward than the lower edge. There are also some muscles
apj)arently serving to give a slight lateral movement.
The muscles of the legs do not differ sufficiently from what has previously been
described by various authors relative to more or less closely allied creatures to make it
worth while to describe them at any length. As before stated, the principal muscles
which move the whole leg arise from the endosternite ; but some few serving to give a
somewhat revolving motion arise from the epimera, which are very slight structures, in
fact little more than thickened margins to the acetabula of the legs, and from the
neighbouring cuticle : all are inserted in the proximal end of the coxa. The muscles
which move the individual joints of the legs usually arise just in front of tlie posterior
522 MR. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
edge of one joint and are inserted into the posterior edge of the next more distal joint;
the exact jmrt of the edge from near which they respectively arise or into which they
are respectively inserted depending in each case upon the direction of the motion the
muscle is to give.
The External Cuticle.
(Figs. 33, 34, 41, 42, 43.)
This can hardly be said to form part of the internal anatomy, which is the subject of
this paper ; but as it is invaginated in several places, and is thus associated with the
inner organs, and is also somewhat peculiar and interesting in itself, I think it best to
say a few words regarding it.
The skin of Bdella is extremely fine : it is composed of a thin epidermal layer which
in B. Basteri is only about 1 ^ thick ; this layer is highly flexible and quite transparent
and colourless ; the whole of the brilliant red pigment which makes the creatures so con-
spicuous lies in the deeper layers, I. e. hypoderm and fat layer, and on the exterior of
the internal organs themselves. The exterior of this epiderm (fig. 33) is marked with
the fine, wavy, jmraliel lines so common in many of the soft-bodied Acarinn, e. g. the
Sarcoptida) and others ; in B. Basteri they are about 600 to the millimetre. These lines in
Bdella are of an exceptional character ; instead of being mere markings they are ridges,
which are thicker at the base where they start from the cuticle than at their distal
edges, so that a section through one of tliem is like the section of a narrow knife-blade ;
this appearance is increased by the marvellous sharpness and fineness of the edge. The
fine lines springing from the exterior of the cuticle in all drawings of sections of the
whole creature (figs. 34, 41, 42, 43) are not hairs, but are these ridges cut through. The
height of the ridges is considerably more than tlie thickness of the solid part of the
epidermal layer : in B. Basteri tlie ridges in their liighest part are about 2"5 /x liigh,
more than twice the thickness of the layer ; but the height of the ridge, /. e. the
amount of its projection, is not equal in all parts, for the following reason : — Each
ridge is not an even one of a fixed thickness and projection throughont, it is a series
of small drawn-out swellings of different sizes and lengths joined by their fine ends ; the
ridge never ceases and never loses its distal knife-edge, but it swells out and contracts
irregularly, so that when looked at from above it appears like a string of irregular beads,
each bead drawn out to a point at both ends and joined to the next bead by an extremely
fine thread. The height of the ridge in section naturally depends on whether the section
cuts a large or a small swelling or falls between two swellings. It is not possible to
depict this irregularity in drawings on the scale of the figures above enumerated.
The hypoderm is a much thicker tunic than the epiderm, and is of the usual character
in the Acarina, with loosely joined living cells of irregular size which have very distinct
elongated nuclei and elliptical nucleoli.
IXTERXAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA. 523
Bibliography of the principal works I'eferred to in the foregoing memoir or giving
information respecting the Bdellinte, not including works which only record species.
1 . Berlese, Antonio. — .A.cari, Miriapodi, e Scorpioni italiani. Padua and Florence. Being published
in fasciculi ; first jiart issued in 1882, still continuing; Bdelliiia; finished in "Ordo Prostigmata"
(Trombidiidie), 1893.
2. C.4NESTRINI, Giovanni. — Prospetto delP Acarofauna italiana. Parte ii. Padua, 1886.
3. Canestrini, Giovanni. — " Abbozzo del Sistema acarologico," Atti R. 1st. Veneto di Sci. &c.,
t. ii. ser. 7, 1891. Keprinted in the above-named work TNo. 2), Parte v., Padua, 1892, pp. 560-
587.
4. Croneberg, a. — " Oil the Anatomy of Eylais extendens, Muller, with observations on allied forms,"
in Russian in ' Nachr. Ges. d. Freunde d. Naturkuude,' Moscow, 1878. A short summary in
German, called '•' Ueber den Bau der Hydrachnideii," in Zool. Anz. 1878, Nr. 14, p. 316.
5. Cronebeug, A. — " Ueber den Bau von Trombidiuin," in Bull. Soc. Nat. de Moscou, 1879, part 2,
p. 234.
6. Henkin, H. — " Beitriige zur Anatomie, Entwicklungsgeschichte uiid Biologic von Trombidium
fuliyinosum, Herm.," Zeitsch. wiss. Zool. Bd. xxxvii. (1882) pp. 554-663.
7. Johnston, George. — "The Acarides of Berwickshire specifically described," Trans. Berwickshire
Natui-alists' Field-Club, vol. ii. (1847) p. 221.
8. Karpelles, Ludwig (now Karell, L.). — " Zur Anatomie von ^rfe/Za arewaria, Kramer," in Verb.
k.-k. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, Bd. xliii. (1893) pp. 421-430.
9. KocH, Carl Ludwig. — Deutschlands Crustaceen, Miriapoden und Arachniden. Regensburg,
1835-1841. Forming Hefte 1-40 of Herrich-Schaffer's edition of Dr. G. W. F. Panzer's
' Deutschlands Insecten.''
10. Koch, Carl Ludwig.— Uebersicht der Arachniden-Systems. Niirnberg, 1837-1850.
11. Kramer, P.—" Die Familie der Bdelliden," in Areh. f. Naturg. Bd. xxxxii. fl876) pp. 183-196.
12. Kramer, P. — "Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Milben," in Zeit. ges. Naturwiss. Bd. Ii. (1878)
pp. 552—3.
13. Kramer, P. — " Ueber Milben," ibid. 1881, section 7, pp. 24-32.
14. Michael, A. D. — " A Study of the Internal Anatomy of Thyas petropMlus, an unrecorded Hydrachnid
found in Cornwall," in Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 5 March, 1895, pp. 174r-209.
15. MoNiEZ, R. — " Aeariens et Insectes marins des cotes du Boulonnais," Rev. Biol. d. Nord d. 1. France,
t. xi. (1890) pp. 1-28.
16. Nalepa, A. — "Die Anatomic der Tyroglypheu," Sitzb. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Bd. xc. Abth. 1 (1884),
p. 198, Bd. xcii. Abth. I (1885), p. 116.
17. Pagenstecher, H. A. — Beitrage zur Anatomie der Milben. Heft i. Leipzig, 1860.
18. ScHAUB, R. VON. — " Ueber die Anatomie von Hydrodroina (C. L. Koch). Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss
der Hydrachniden," Sitzb. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Bd. xcvii. Abth. 1 (1888), p. 98.
19. ScHAUB, R. VON. — " Ueber marine Hydrachniden ,uebst einige, Bemerkungen iiber Midea (Bruz.),"
ibid. Bd. xcviii. Abth. 1 (1889), p. 163.
20. Trouessart, E. L. — " Considerations gciierales sur la classification des Acariens, suivies d'un essai
de classification nouvcUe," Rev. d. Sci. nat. d. I'Ouest, t. ii. 1892, pp. 35-44.
21. Trouessart, E. L. — " Note sur une grande espece de Bdelle maritime originaire d'Islande," Jourii.
Anat. et Physiol. (Robin's), xxx. An. 1894, no. 1, pp. 117-125.
524
ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Lettering.
A. Anus (so called) . This is really the orifice
for the discharge of the excretory organs
only, not apparently of the alimentary
canal.
ac. Air-chamher of respiratory system.
acg. Air-chamber in genital organs of male.
acp. Passage from acy to the outer part of the
penial canal.
as. Amphioid sclerite of penial canal.
B. Chitinous bar at the rear of the roof of the
rostrum. Henkiu's " Chitinbriicke."
bh. Brushes of hair or spines inside penial
canal.
br. Brain.
C. Cuticle.
C(S. Anterior cieca of ventriculus.
cap. Posterior caeca of ventriculus.
cas. Caecum of tubixlar salivary gland.
ct. Connective tissue.
cu. Cuneiform chamber of reniform salivary
gland.
D. Common duct of three of the salivary glands,
viz., the tubular, the reniform, and the
anterior.
da. Duct from the anterior salivary gland.
dp. Duct from the pericibal salivary gland.
dr. Duct from the reniform salivary gland.
dsa. Duct from the azygous salivary gland.
E. Excretory organ.
el. External labia of genital organs.
eph. Epipharynx.
es. Embedding-sac of male genital organs.
ew. Excretoiy (urinary) white matter.
fg. Food-globules absorbed and lying within
the cells of the ventriculus.
gaa. Azygous accessory gland of male genital
organs.
gl. Laminated gland of male genital organs.
gin. Glandulaj mucoste (the great mucous
glands) ; probably modified vasa deferentia.
gso. Supra-oesophageal ganglion (upper part of
brain).
gsu. Sub-ffisophageal ganglion (under part of
brain) .
H. Hypoderm.
hm.
hp.
K.
La.
Ian.
le.
U.
mc.
mcr.
md.
mda.
VI dl.
me.
mf.
mfp.
ml.
mlp.
mop.
m,p.
mr.
mrp.
n\.
n'2.
71 3.
n 4.
na 1.
nu )i.
na 3.
na 4.
nus.
nb.
nc.
Half-moon-shaped spiked membrane of epi-
pharynx.
Hamuli (hooks) of the membranous lobes of
the central tube of the penial canal.
Entrance from the mucous gland to the
testicular bridge.
Labia closing the duct from ,the azygous
salivary gland.
Labia ani.
External labia of genital aperture.
Lingua.
Constrictor muscles of penial canal.
Constrictor muscles of receptaculum cibi.
Mandibles.
Divaricator muscles of the labia ani.
Divaricator muscles of the labia which close
the duct from the azygous accessory gland
of the male genital organs.
Dorso-ventral muscles.
Membranous flaps at the distal end of the
maxillary lip.
Membranous flaps at the end of the central
tube of the penial canal.
Maxillary lip.
Levator muscles of the roof of the pharynx
(dilatores pharyngis) .
Occlusor (constrictor) muscles of the pha-
rynx.
Partition between the mandibles.
Anterior retractor muscles of penial canal.
Posterior retractor muscles of penial canal.
Nerve to first leg.
Nerve to second leg.
Nerve to third leg.
Nerve to fourth leg.
The branch of the nerve of the first leg
which is the honiologue of the accessory
nerve of Croneberg, Schaub, Nalepa, &c.
The like of the second leg.
The like of the third leg.
The like of the fourth leg.
Second accessory nerve of fourth leg.
Posterior branch of the fourth leg-nei've.
Branch of the pharyngeal nerve going to
the receptaculum cibi (sucking-stomach) .
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDJILLA.
525
nd. Nerve to dorso-vcntral muscles between
second and third legs.
ng. Genital nerve.
nm. Mandibular nerve.
no. Optic nerve.
no' . Branch of the optic nerve.
np. Palpal nerve.
np". Branch of ])alpal nerve distributed to the
maxillary lip.
nph. Pharyngeal nerve.
nv. Nerve to muscles running from the dorso-
vcrtex to the maxillary lip.
0. Ova.
oc. Cornea of the eye.
od. Oviduct.
ce. Qilsopliagus.
01. Lens of the eye.
OS. Eyes.
ov. Ovary.
P. Palpus.
pc'. Penial canal, dorsal portion.
pc~. Penial canal, ventral portion.
pe. Penis?
ph. Pharynx.
pp. Propharyngeal plate.
pr. Roof of the pharynx.
R. Roof of rostrum.
re. Receptaculum cibi (sucking-stomach).
rd. Retinal disks.
re. Retinulae (rods) of the eye.
rs. Receptaculum seminis.
S. Stigma.
*«. Azygous salivary gland.
s(/u. Anterior salivary gland.
sgp. Pericibal salivary gland.
sgr. Rcniform salivary gland.
sgt. Tul)ular salivary gland.
*//. Hollows in embedding-sacs to receive testes.
sni. S perm-mot lier-cells.
T. Testes.
til. Testicular bridge.
td. Duct of the testis.
tdm. Common duct of the two testes on one side
of the body.
thl. Tactile hairs of maxillary lip.
tl. Tendinous ligament between respiratory
air-chamber and cuticle.
tp. Exterior fleshy cells of testis.
//•. Tracheae.
tra. Principal tracheal trunk from stigma to air-
chamber.
//. Tendinous tie between epipharynx and
lingua.
tvs. Portion of testes functioning as a vesicula
seminis.
V. Ventriculus.
vg. Vestibulum glandula; mucosae (glandular
antechamber).
]V. Wedge-shaped chamber in reniform salivary
gland.
All the figures, except where specialli/ mentioned, /lace the anterior end, where there is one, nearest to
the top of the page.
All the figures, except 12, 2u, 41, and 42, represent Bdella Basteri.
Plate 41-
Fig. 1. (Right central part of Plate.) The epipharynx, propharyngeal plate, and associated muscles
seen from below : x 220. The propharyngeal plate with its membranous wrinkled border is
at the lower end of the drawing ; tlie one of the occlusor muscles of the pharynx which
curves over and depresses the plate passes transversely above it and is partly hidden by it.
The epipharynx with its membranous border is the upper part of the drawing, and its semi-
lunar spiked membrane is shown at its hind margin.
2. (Right top of Plate.) The epipharynx, lingua, propharyngeal plate, and part of the pharynx and
pharyngeal sac seen from the right side : x 220. The lingua is cut short ; the propharyngeal
plate, occlusor (constrictor) j)liaryngis muscles, and part of the levator tecti pharyngis
muscles are seen through the wall of the pharyngeal sac in consequence of its transparency.
The duct from the pericibal salivary gland is seen discharging near the hind corner of the
epipharynx.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL. VI. 71
526 ME. A. D. MICHAEL ON THE
Fig. 3. (Left middle of Plate.) The posterior part of the pharynx, tlic receptaculum cibi (suckiug-
stomach), and anterior jiart of the ojsophagus seen from the right side : x 70. The darkish
mass inside the receptaculum cibi is the food-contents.
4. (Right top corner of Plate.) The receptaculum cibi, maxillary lip, and left palpus seen from
above, x 70. The end of the lingua is shown protruded ; the oesophagus is hidden.
5. (Right a little below centre of Plate). The anterioi' end of this figure points to the right. The
pharyngeal plate and its levator (distcnsor pharyugis) muscles seen from the right side :
X 320.
6. (Lower edge of Plate.) Ventriculus from above : x 30. This figure is drawn from a young
female, mature, but only one egg showed any sign of yolk-segmentation. In older specimens
the form of the ventriculus is generally lost from distension and the pressure of other organs.
7. (Lower edge of Plate.) The excretory (Malpighian) organ from the left side: X 120. The
white matter within the viscus is the secretory (urinary ?) matter.
8. (Left top corner of Plate.) The tubular, leniforni, and anterior salivary glands on the left side
of the body with their common duct : X 120. The reniform gland is seen almost on edge.
This drawing is slightly diagrammatic in the sense that it is not quite drawn] to scale (to
avoid waste of space) and that the parts are a little separated in order to show them.
9. (Lower left corner of Plate.) The left reniform salivary gland and duct seen from the side :
X 120. The duet is cut short.
10. (Right centre of Plate.) The azygous and pericibal salivary glands with their ducts in situ in
the body, seen from above : x 55. A small part of the posterior end of the receptaculum
cibi is seen between the pericibal glands.
11. (Right lower corner of Plate.) The azygous and the left pericibal salivary glands with their
ducts seen from the inner side : x 120. The azygous is to the left, the pericibal to the
right of the figure; the duct from the latter is cut short.
12. (Below centre of Plate.) Sagittal median section through the azygous salivary gland oi Bdella
vulgaris : x 1 80.
13. (Central upper figure.) The brain and nerves seeu from above : X 100. The hole where the
oesophagus passed between the supra-cesophageal and the sub-cesophageal ganglia is shown,
but the oesophagus itself has been removed, except a small portion anterior to the brain.
The nerve to the receptaculum cibi has been tui'ued a little to the right to show the
pharyngeal nerve from which it springs and which it would hide. The mandibular nerve is
turned a little outward, as it would lie over the palpal nerve. The left genital nerve is
slightly turned over to show the branches on its under surface. The whole length of the
optic nerve is shown ; the other nerves are cut short.
14. The branching of the mandibular nerve : x 200.
15. The termination of the labial branch of the palpal nerve in the maxillary lip : x 400.
16. One of the dermal glands and duet : x 700.
Plate 42-
Fig. 17. The reproductive organs of the male spread out so as to show details : x 70. The embedding-sacs
{es) are turned to the right and lelt, carrying their respective pairs of testes with them; in
situ they would lie close together, present their edges to the observer, and hide the testes
between them ; the azygous accessory gland would be more closely jiressed by the great
mucous glands, which would probably hide the laminated gland. The almost globular organ
in the centre of the group is the head of the peuial canal looked down on perpendicularly ;
the glandular antechambers are seeu entering it. The laminated gland is seen in the median
INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELI.A. 527
line directed to the top of the Plate; it enters tlie peuial canal mucli below the head, but
looking down ])erpendicularly this is not appreciated.
Fig. 18. The penial canal, external labia, laminated gland, air-chamber, and parts of the azygous
accessory gland and glandidar antechambers seen from the side : x 120.
19. One of the embedding-sacs after the testes and other organs have been removed from it, seen
from within : X 70. The hollows in which the testes lay are shown ; the azygous accessory
gland, laminated gland, penial canal, and external labia are attached ; the labia are partly
seen from the exterior.
20. The testes which have been removed from fig. 19, together with half the testicular bridge, one
of the great mucous glands, the glandular antechambers, &c. : X 70.
21. Central tube, hamuli, and detailed structure of penial canal : x 250. The outer wall of the
penial canal is partly cut away so as to show the interior.
22. One (the right) of the chitinous air-chambers which is sunk in the cmbedding-sac, from the
exterior : x 200. The chamber has been dissected out of the sac.
23. A portion of the interior of the laminated gland, showing the principal laminte and the oblique
lesser lamclhe : X GoO.
24. Genital organs of young female in situ, the oviduct being only slightly uncurled: x 120. The
reeeptaculum seminis is hidden.
25. Genital organs of young virgin female (reared) of Bdella vulgaris, slightly spread out; but the
curl of the oviduct is natural.
26. Perpendicular section through one of the eyes : x 550.
27. Horizontal section through the terminal part of the optic nerve and the retinal discs : x 200.
The section cuts the lower eye through the rods (retiuulee), the cells of the disc only
showing near the periphery ; the upper eye is cut wholly in the retinal disc.
28. Transverse section of the oesophagus between pharynx and braiu, to show the irregular shaped
lumen : x 650. A typical section was selected, but probably no two sections were ever
really similar ; they vary widely.
29. Maxillary lip from below : x 80.
30. The mandibles in. situ, seen from above : x 80.
31. The left mandible seen from the inner (flat) side : x 80.
32. Terminal portion of maxillary lip from below, showing the membranous flaps inside (above) the
lip : X 450. The lip has been flattened out to show the flaps ; in reality when the lingua is
not protruded the sides of the lip curl upward and the two flaps lie against each other,
closing the entrance anteriorly.
33. A small portion of the external cuticle showing the wavy irregular ridges composed of long-
shaped raised dots, joined by the lower parts of the ridge : x 550.
Plate 43.
Fig. 34. Median sagittal section of male : x 50. The section is a thick one, so as to show some organs
which are not in the actual median plane where they are not hidden by other organs which
arc in that plane. Thus one mucous gland is shown with a portion of the azygous accessory
gland and the genital nerve passing over it. The caeca of the ventriculus have practically
closed over the excretory organ from the pressure of food-coutents and other causes.
Numerous small traclie:e (not lettered) are seen between the brain and the ventriculus and
mucous gland. The resophagus is seen passing through the brain, and the reeeptaculum
cibi (sucking-stomach) sjirings from its dorsal side. The cells of the ventriculus are crowded
with food-droplets, the excretory organ with the usual white matter.
528 ON THE INTERNAL ANATOMY OF BDELLA.
Fig. 35. Sectiou througli the testes and embedding-sac on one side of the hody : x60; showing that the
latter is a hollow visciis, although the lumen is small in comparison to the size of the organ
The sperm-mother-cells are seen on the right part of the testes, the portion functioning as a
vesicula seminis on the left nearest to the embeddiug-sac ; these portions are full of
spermatozoa.
36. Median sagittal section througli the mucous glaud (vas deferens?) and glandular antechamber
on one side of the body : x 100. The cells have all di?charged their contents and are empty,
their walls remaining, forming pockets ; the outer fleshy walls with the nuclei persist.
37. Section of a portion of the mucous gland when partly filled with secretion : x 140.
38. Median sagittal section of one of the glandular antechambers of the male: x 400.
39. Median sagittal section through the laminated gland of the male : X 150.
40. Longitudinal section through the air-chamber of the male genital organs, to show the spines
projecting into the interior : x 400. In this figure the lower end is slightly the anterior.
41. Transverse section of male Bdella vulgaris cut in the plane of the glandular antechambers to
show the difference of their cellulation from those of B. Basteri. The muscles arising from
the amphioid sclerite are inserted into the labia which close the ducts from the azygous
accessory and laminated glands; just the end of the last-named gland is seen above the
labia. The inner portion of the mucous gland on the right side is shown just at its end,
where the minute passage from the testes exists ; this is shown by the small circle in the
middle of the light spot ; the other parts of the mucous glands are cut a little deeper in the
wall of that organ.
42. Transverse section of male Bdella vulgaris posterior to fig. 41 and taken in about the central
plane of the peuial canal (the head of the canal bends over in this species). The small part
of the azygous accessory gland is seen cut through transversely immediately above the
penial canal.
43. Transverse section of female in the plane of the receptaculum seminis : x 30. The oviduct is
distended by eggs, some nearly I'ipe for discharge. The cells of the cseca of the ventriculus
are full of food-droplets. The walls of the oviduct have become very thin in consequence
of the distension
44. Section through part of the wall of the oviduct of a young female: x2o0; showing the
thickness of the wall, the mode of folding, and the cellulation.
45. The respiratory organs : x 65. The Avhole of the air-chambers and principal tracheal trunk are
shown, but the finer tracheae are cut short.
i,ff-- ^^'
■-r-
i
' \
np
^%v
13.
rip c t,p/,
Trans. Linn Soc.Zool Ser ZVol.VLPl*!,
\
,j,.,.
/'/'
/+
■'/'
■ ■/.I,
to.
•A
f%
'■'/-'
/K
" € <mm
■^*9?a«<»''
-?£fc:
'-'''
/.,/?.
3_,^ ■'///'
A D Michad ..d ,v;.\ do;.
ANATOMY OF Bl)ELL/\
rreyt-ij iE.:n%<ir.\'ior.na
TraNo.Uhn Sqc.Zcol.S;
.^ i ^
/" '
■'t
f/aa
::r
ih
.>^
'■r- -'^$)
\.
:.'.<)
..-rTe^^V.
Mli^.-:
^1
:'•/.
i\ :
A\
;^'
ANATi'.'MY OF KDELLA,
Trak;; 1.!;
V:?i.43.
"-/'
JV.
■A -r -■ ':*/ ^
^*.
/ltd
t/'ti;
■■''^;
^MV:/?
.;:?■
•>57'
•f/.
feV /
,77.
prl
I ^
'e^4
,1 %%,
^'^VSi^
^?t
J!<;^'.
.•.>=^
-a ;•
k I.
^::
-9^"
... ^
rt.C ^^
*".
A D, Michael ,id n.il.<iel
ANATO^r/ Oh' BDELLA.
Cr.Freyl.l^ iEerndt.VtiMina.
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
MEMOEANDA CONCEENING TEANSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, containing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Onl}' certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and Gs. to Fellows; to
Vols. 26-30, 4s. to the public, and 3s. to Fellows.
The Second yerios of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botauical parts see Botanical
wrapper) : —
Vohime.
I. Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part.
Part
Part
II. Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
Part
III. Part
Wlien Price to the
Publishetl. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Seeies. — Zoology.
I. 1875 1 4 0 .
II. 1875 0 6 0 .
HI. 1876 1 8 0 .
IV. 1877 0 16 0 .
V. 1877 0 18 0 .
VI. 1877 1 2 0 .
VII. 1878 1 16 0 .
VIII. 1879 1 0 0 .
I. 1879 1 4 0 .
II. 1881 0 15 0 .
III. 1882 1 8 0 .
IV. 1882 0 7 6 .
V. 1882 0 3 0 .
VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Vn. 1883 0 5 0 .
VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
X. 1884 0 4 6 .
XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
XIV. 1885 0 6 0 .
XV. 1885 0 4 6 .
XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
XVIII. 1888 0 2 0 .
I. 1884 1 14 0 .
Volume.
When
Published.
Price to the
Public.
£ s. d.
Price to
Fellows.
Second Series. — Zoology {continued).
2nd Ser. ZOOLOGY.]
[VOL. VI. PART 8.
THE
G'Y/H
TRANSACTIONS
- im
OF
THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
TITLEPAGE, CONTENTS, AND INDEX.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
BY TAYLOR AND FE-VXCIS, RED LION COUIiT, FLEET STREET.
SOLD AT THE SOCIETY'S APARTMENTS, BTJRLINGTON-HOUSE, PICCADILLY, W.,
AND BY LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., PATERNOSTER-ROW.
February 1897.
INDEX.
[XoTE.— Synonyms and Native Names are printed in italics. A star is added to names which appear
to be used here for the first time.]
Abrachia, Kirhf, 475.
brevicomis, Eirhij, 475.
longimana, Saussure, 475.
Acanthoderus vernacosum, De Haan,
456.
Acanthomunua, Beddard, 203.
Acaridie, 314.
Aearina, Nitzsdi, 483, 522.
Acartia, Dana, 65 ; mentioned 22,
64, 68.
Clausi, Gieshr., 67 ; mentioned,
22, 152.
denticornis, Brady, 66 ; men-
tioned, 22, 68.
discaudata, Gieshr., 67.
fjahoonensis, Scott MS., 67.
laxa, Dana, 65 ; mentioned, 13,
14, 15, 18. 19, 21, 22, 66.
plumosa, Scott *, 66 ; mentioned,
22, 67, 152.
spinicaudata, Gieshr., 8.
verrucosa, /. C. Tlwmjis., 70.
Acarus, Linn., 478, 489.
longicornis, Linn., 478.
Achrioptera fallax, Coq., 468.
Acrophyllinse, 468.
Actineda corniger, Berlese, 506.
Adelops, Dej., 261.
jEgisthus, Gicsbr., 104 ; mentioned,
22.
aculeatus, Gieshr., 105.
longirostris, Scott *, 104 ; men-
tioned, 21, 22, 156.
.Sltidius, Brady, 70 ; mentioned,
22.
armatus, Brady, 70 ; mentioned,
13-18, 21, 22, 71, 72.
armiger, Gieshr., 71 ; mentioned,
18, 22, 72, 152.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL
AUorchestes recens, G. M. Thomson,
301.
AmaUophora, Scott, 54 ; mentioned,
22.
dubia, Scott *, 55 ; mentioned,
18, 22, 56, 148.
, var. similis, Scott *, 56 ;
mentioned, 148.
magna, Scott *, 55 ; mentioned,
18, 22, 56, 148.
robusta, Scott *, 56 ; mentioned,
22, 148.
typica, Scott *, 54 ; mentioned,
22, 147.
Amblyopsis spelreus, DeJcay, 265.
Ammonia, KocJi, 479, 480.
Amphipeplca ampulla, HiUton, 247.
Amphipoda, 163, 218.
Gammaridea, 274.
Amijhithopsis, Boeck, 234.
Amymone, Claus, 94; mentioned, 22.
Andrewi, Scott *, 94 ; mentioned,
8,22, 154.
sphasrica. Clans, 95.
Amymonince, 94.
Anaspidffi, Boecl; 286, 299.
Anaspides, G. M. TJiomson, ftnote
285-303.
tasmaniae, G. M. Thomson, 285,
302.
, affinities and systematic
position of, 297-301.
, alimentary system of, 293.
, anatomical structure of,
292-295.
— , circulatory apparatus of,
294.
, excretory organs of, 294.
, nerve cord, 296.
VI.
Anaspides tasmaniae, G. M. Thom-
son, nervous system and sense-
organs of, 296.
, organ of hearing, 296.
, reproductive organs, 295.
Anaspis, G. M. Thomson, ftnote
285, 286.
Anophthalmus, Sturm, 251.
Antaria, Dana, 116.
yracilis, Dana, 116.
mcditerranca, Claus, 117.-
ohtusa, Dana, 116.
Anthelura elongata, Norm., 214.
Anthrobia, Tellhampf, 261.
Anthura, Leacli, 205, 217, 262.
Anthuria, 217.
Anthurida;, 164, 204-209, 212, 216,
217, 245.
Apseudida;, 205, 206, 207.
Apus, Schiiff., ftnote 380.
Araohnida, an attempt to elucidate
the jjhylogcny of the (U. M. Ber-
nard), 387.
Araehnoidea, 501, 502.
Aranetc, 309, 310.
Araneida;, 308, 314.
Araneiodes, Pall., 334.
Arcturidas, 207.
Arcturus, Cuv., 205.
Arpacticus, Baird, 102.
Arrhidfeus nigrieornis, StM, 472.
palinurus, Westtu., 472.
rosea. Stall, 472.
StaU, Kirhy *, 471.
Artotrogida;, 127.
Artotrogus, Boech, 128 ; mentioned,
22, 129.
abyssicolus, Scott *, 128 ; men-
tioned, 156, 159.
72
530
INDEX,
Artotrog:iis Boeckii, Brady, 128.
Aschiphasma, Wcslw., 475.
annulipes, Westw., 475.
hieroglyphicus, GiiH. MS., 475.
Aschipliasminaj, 475.
Ascomyzon, Tfiorell, 128.
echinicola, Norm., 127.
Asellida", 202, 206, 207, 208, 214,
216, 244.
Asellopsis, Bradij (f- Eoherls., 96.
Asellus, Geoffr, 170, 175, 176, 178,__
179, 207, 208, 255.
aquafcicus, Moniez, 171, 174,
176-178, 191, 193, 196, 207,
256, 202, 272.
, var. freibergensis, Schn.,
178, 260, 272, 279.
brevieauda, Forhes, 178.
cavaticus, Schiodte, 167, 171,
172, 174, 175, 177, 178, 1 80,
185, 256, 280.
communis, Saj/, 175, 178, 257,
272.
foutamis, Spence Bate, 172.
Forelii, Blanc, 175, 176, 177,
178, 252, 258, 260, 261.
intermedius, Forbes, 178.
Sieboldii, de Eour/emont, 171,
172, 178.
, de Rouf/emont ( = A. cava-
ticus, Schiodte), 167.
Astacus, Gron., 275, 298.
Asterocheres, Boeclc, 128.
Asteropo, Philippi, 140 ; mentioned,
132.
Marise, Baird, 140.
squamiger, Scott*, 140; men-
tioned, 132, 160, 161.
teres, Jones, 140.
Atylus, Leach, 234, 300.
Augaptilis, Giesbr., 22, 34, 36.
heoticus, Giesbr., 35; mentioned,
17, 18, 22, 145, 146.
loDgicaudatus, Clavs, 34 ; men-
tioned, 13, 14, 23, 35, 37,
145.
longicornis, Giesbr., 34.
Eattrayi, Scott *, 36 ; mentioned,
18, 23, 35, 146.
Aviculariida?, 311, 392.
Bacillus, St.-Farrj. 4' S(rv., 473,
474.
incommodus, Butler, 470.
Bacillus rossia. Fair., 473.
Bacteria, Seru., 464.
bituberculata, Westw., 463.
lougimaua, Sauss., 475.
nodosum, De Haan, 458.
Trophimus, Westw., 403.
Bacteriidai, 464.
Bactricia, Kirby *, 463.
bituberculata, Westiu., 463.
Trophimus, Westw., 403, 475.
Bactrododema, StM, 468.
sestuaus, Westw., 468.
brevitarsis, Sl&l, 466.
miliaris, Bolivar, 468.
tiarata, St°d, 468.
Welwitschi, BoUvar, 468.
Baculus elongatus, Lubb., 131.
Bacunculina;, 464.
Bairdia, M^Coy, 1156 ; mentioned,
132.
inornata, Scott *, 136 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
BairdiidsE, 130.
Bdella, Latr., The Internal Anatomy
of, by A. D. Michael, 477-528.
BdeUa, Latr., 478, 479, 506-516.
arctica, Thorell, 479.
arenaria, Kramer, 480, 490, 523.
Basteri, Johnston, 47S-528.
capillata, A>rt)?i«-,47S, 514, 519.
lapidaria, Kramer, 479.
longirostris, 481.
marina, Paclard, 479.
sanguinea, Trouessart, 478, 479,
480.
villosa, Kramer 4" Neum., 479.
vulgaris, Uerm., 478-480, 496,
505-528.
,var. littoralis, Moniez, 479.
Bdellida?, 479.
Bdellina% 479, 480, 481.
Bernard, H. M., The Comparative
Morphology of the Galeodidas,
305-417.
Biton, Karsch, 309.
Boruta, Wrze.iiiiowsl'i, 180.
tenebrarum, Wi'zcsniowsli, 172,
ISO, 269.
Brachydesmus, Ileller, 265.
subterraneus, Heller, 265.
Bradya, Boecl-, and Ectiiiosoma,
Boecle, A Revision of the British
Copepoda bidonging to the Genera,
by Thos. Scott & A. Scott, 419-
446.
Bradya, Boeclc, 92, 420 ; meutioced,
23, 426, 427.
brevicornis. Scott *, 92 ; men-
tioned, 23, 92, 154.
Edwardsi, llichard, 430, 431.
elegans, T. Sf A. Scott*, 422 ;
mentioned, 420, 425, 441, 442.
fusca, T. 4- A. Scott *, 424 ;
mentioned, 420, 426, 441,.
442.
hirsuta, T. 4- A. Scott*, 423 i
mentioned, 420, 424, 441, 442.
minor, T. 4- A. Scott*, 425 ^
mentioned, 420, 431, 441,
442.
similis, T. 4- A. Scott*, 424;
mentioned, 420, 425, 441,
442.
typica, Boecl; 420 ; mentioned,
92, 93, 421, 422, 425, 441,
442.
Cfficidotaja, Pacl-ard, 170, 175, 176,
178, 254, 261, 263, 269.
microcephala, Cope, 170.
nickajackensis, Packard, 175,
178.
pallida, PacJcard, 272.
stygia, Pacl-ard, 170, 175, 178,
272.
•, var. pallida, P((c/i-arrf,j272.
Calanida>, 24, 419.
Calanopia, Bona, 77.
brachiata, Dana, 77.
Calanus, Leach, 24 ; mentioned, 23,
26, 28.
arcuicornis, Dana, 73.
atteniiatus, Dana, 28.
comptus, Dana, 13, 23, 26, 149,
150.
finmarchicus, Gunner, 26.
gracilis, Dana, 13-21, [23, 25,,
26.
mirabilis, Lubb., 28.
parvus, Glaus, 26.
pavo, Dana, 37.
phimidosus, Claus, 39.
propinquus, Brady, 13-23, 25.
pygmnous. Clans, 27.
stylifer, Dana, 75.
tonsus, Brady, 20, 23, 25.
turliinutus, Dana, 76.
valgus, Brady, 13-24.
Caligus, Midler, 129: mentioned, 23,
132.
INDEX.
531
Caligus bcngoensis, Scott*, 130 ; men-
tioned, 23.
dubius, Scott *, 130 ; meutinned,
23.
Muri'iiyanus, Scott *, 1.-9 ; men-
tioned, 23.
(?) Thymni, nana, 129 ; men-
tioned, 23.
CaUiope, Spence Bate, 181.
subterranea, Chilton, 180, 181,
234.
Calliopius, Leach, 163, 181, 233.
fluviatilis, O. M. Thomson, 235,
253, 256, 257, 262, 301.
subtcrraneus, Chilton, 163,172,
181, 184, 185, 200, 225, 234,
235, 246, 248, 253-262, 269,
283, 284, 301.
€alocalauus, Gichr., 37 ; mentioned, 23.
pavo, Dana, 23, 37 ; mentioned,
13, 15-17, 39, 150.
plumulosus, Chnis, 39 ; men-
tioned, 16,23, 39, 145, 150.
€alynda, St?d, 464.
€alyptomera, 133.
Calyptopis-stage, 297, 298.
Cambarus, Erichs., 256, 257, 275.
Bartonii, Fahi:, 257.
pellueidus, Tellkampf, 25G.
stygius. Bandy, 2bl.
Candace, Dana, 60 ; mentioned, 23.
bispinosa, Claits, 63.
curta, Dana, 61.
intermedia, Scott *, 61 ; men-
tioned, 13-16, 19-23, 62,
148.
paebydactyla, Dana, 60 ; men-
tioned, 13-23, 01, 02,63.
pectinata,7?/-o(/v, 61 ; mentioned,
13-23, 62, 63.
tenuiremus, Scott MS., 62.
truncata, Dana, 63 : mentioned,
16-20, 23.
varicans, Gieshr., 62 ; meu-
tioned, 18, 23, 148, 151.
€andacia, Dana, 60.
Caudona Candida, Miillei; 134.
Canterbury (N.Z.), General Fauna of
the Subterranean Waters of, 246-
248.
Plains and their underground
Waters. 248-253.
Canthoeamprina3, 96.
Canthocamptus roseus, Dana, 92.
Caprella, Lam., 205.
Caprella deutata, Haller, 299.
Caprellida;, 209, 299.
Carciiius, Latr., 298.
Catopia, Dana, 77.
furcata, Dana, 77.
Caulonia, St8l, 465.
bifolia, St,V, 465.
spinosissima, Kirhy*, 464, 475.
Centropages, Krih/er, 77 ; mentioned,
23, 78.
bracliiatus, Dana, 77; men-
tioned, 21-23.
furcatus, Dana, 77 ; mentioned,
15, 16, 19, 21, 23.
violaceus. Clans, 78; mentioned,
15-19, 23.
Cerapinae, 225.
Cerapus tubularis, Say, 226.
ChaUmus, Burm., 132.
Characters, special, of the Subter-
ranean Fauna, 259-268.
Chelifer cancroides, Linn., 514.
Chernetidce, 316, 324, 348.
Chilton, Chas., The Subterranean
Crustacea of New Zealand, with
some general Remarks on the
Fauna of Caves and Wells, 163-
284.
Chondrostethus, Kirhy *, 455.
Woodfordi, Kirhy*, 455, 456,
475.
Chthonius, Koch, 261.
Cladocera, Latr., 132.
Cladomorphidse, 472.]
Cladoniorphus, Gray, 472.
Cladoxerus serratipes. Gray, 450.
Clausoealanus, Gieshr., 72 ; men-
tioned, 23.
arcuioornis, Dana, 73 ; men-
tioned, 13-16, 18, 23, 153.
furcatus, Brady, 72 ; mentioned,
1.5, 16, 18, 23.
latipes, Scott *, 72 ; mentioned,
23, 153.
Cleobis, Sim., 307, 309.
Cleta, Claris, 96.
serrata. Clans, 96.
Clefcodes, Brady, 23, 98.
linearis. Clans, 23, 98, 157.
Clytemnestra, Daiui, 106 ; men-
tioned, 23.
Hendorffi, Poppe, 109.
rostrata, Brady, 106 : men-
tioned, IS-is, 18-21, 23,
157.
Clytemnestra scutellata, Dana, 106,
108.
tenuis, Lulib., 106.
Conchoecida;, 141.
Copepoda, A Revision of the British,
belonging to the Genera Bradya,
Boeck, and Ectinosoma, Boecl; by
Thos. Scott and Andrew Scott,
419-446.
Copilia, Dana, 113 ; mentioned,
ftnote 13, 23.
denticulata, Claus, 23, 113, 114.
Fultoni, Scott *, 114 ; men-
tioned, 23, 156.
mirabilis, Dana, 113 ; men-
tioned, 13-23, 114, 115.
quadrata, Dana, 113 ; men-
tioned, 21, 23.
Rattrayi, Scott, 21.
Corophium, Latr., 205.
excavatum, G.M. Thomson, 301.
Coryca-'idas, Dana, 110, 111.
Corycseus, Dana, 110 ; mentioned,
23.
anylictis, Lubb., 112.
ftircifer, Claus, 110.
limbatus, Brady, 111 ; men-
tioned, 14-23.
obtusus, Dana, 112 ; mentioned,
18-23, 113.
pellueidus, Dana, 110 ; men-
tioned, 13-23, 111.
rostratus, Claus, 110.
epeeiosus, Dana, 112; men-
tioned, 8, 13-23.
styliferus, Lubb., 110.
varius, Dana, 110; mentioned,
8, 13-23.
venustus, Dana, 111 ; men-
tioned, 13-20, 23.
Corynura, Brady, 64, 65.
gracilis, Brady, 65.
Corynuropis, Scott MS., 64.
tenuieaudatus, Scott MS., 64.
Crabro, Fahr., 487.
Crangouyx, Spence Bate, 163, 168,
173, 176-180, 218, 245,251-255,
261, 263, 269.
antennatus, PacJcard, 176, 178.
bifurcus, Hay, 176, 218.
compactus, Chilton, 220 ;
mentioned, 163, 166, 172,
174, 180-185, 218-220, 229,
245, 246, 254-257, 261, 262,
269, 282, 301.
72*
532
INDEX.
Crangonyx Ermaniiii=Gammarus
Ermannii, Milne- Edw., 168, 256.
gracilis, Smith, 170, 172, 176,
179, 218-220, 256.
lueifugus, Mmj, 176, 178, 219.
mucronatus, Forhes, 173, 178,
219, ftnote 220, 269.
Packardii, Smith, 176, 178, 179,
( = C. vitreus, Pachard) 1 78.
pungeas, Musvj., 256.
recurvatiis [recurvus], Orube,
170.
recurvus, Gruhe, 169.
subterraneus, Spence Bate,
168-174, 256, 276.
tenuis. Smith, 172, 176.
vitreus, Packard, 170, 172, 176,
178, 256.
vitreus, Smith, 178, (^Siygo-
bromus vitreus. Cope) 178.
(Stygobromus) vitreus, Cope,
172.
Cruregens, Chilton, 163, 167, 209-
218, 245, 256, 262.
fontanus, Chilton, 211 ; men-
tioned, 163, 176, 180-185,
200, 255, 257, 259, 264-
269, 282.
Crustacea, Subterranean, of New
Zealand : with some general
Remarks on the Fauna of Caves
and Wells, by Chas. Chilton, 163-
284.
Crustacea, Subterranean, origin of,
253-259.
Cryptognathus, Kramer, 479.
Ctenomorpha, Gray, 472.
albopunotatum, A'tVSy *, 472.
briarous, Gray, 472.
Cyamida;, 209.
Cyamus, Lamx., 205.
Cyathura carinata, Kroyer, 213.
Cyclopicera, Brady, 23, 127.
lata, Brady, 23, 127, 158.
Cyclopidae, 89.
Cyclops chelifer, Miiller, 102.
lonyicornis, MiiUer, 70.
novae-zealaiidia>, O. M. TJioms.,
247.
pulcbcllus, Koch, 272.
Cymothoa, Fahr., 267.
Cymothoidas, 206, 209.
Cypbocrania aestuans, Westw., 468.
Cyjjhophtbalmus, Jos., 348.
Cypria, Zeid-er^ 132, 134.
C3-pria atlautica, Scott*, 132, 134;
mentioned, 136, 138, 161.
exsculpta, Fischer, 134.
ophtbalmica, Jurine, 134.
CypridiE, 133, 134.
Cypridinidffi, 140.
Cypris prasina, Fischer, 134.
Cythere, MiiUer, 132, 133, 137.
costellata, Roemer, 139.
multieava, Scott *, 137 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
radula, Brady, 132, 138.
rimosa, Scott*, 138 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
sculptilis, Scott *, 137 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
thalassica, Scott*, 138; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
venusta, Scott *, 138 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
Cytherella, Jones, 132, 144.
africana, Scott *, 144 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160, 161.
pumila, Scott *, 144 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
soolica, Brady, 144.
CytbereUidffi, 144.
Cytheridce, 133, 137.
Cytheridea margaritea, Brady, 139.
Cytheropteron, G. 0. Sars, 132,
139.
trilobites, Brady, 132, 139,
160.
Cytberura, G. 0. Sars, 132, 139.
simulans, Scott *, 139 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160.
Dactylopus, Clans, 23, 98, 100.
latipes, Scott *, 99 ; mentioned,
23, 155.
propinquus, Scott *, 99 ; men-
tioned, 23, 100.
Stromii, Baird, 99, 100.
tisboides, Claus, 99.
Danais arcbippus, Fahr., 487.
Descent, Theory of, the Bearings of
the rheuomtna of Subterranean
Life on the (Chilton), 266-272.
Desamine, Leach, 300.
Diapheromera Sayi, Gray, 447.
Diaptomus, Luhh., 75.
duhius, Lubb., 75.
lotiyicawlatus, Lubb., 76.
Dias, Lilljeb., 65.
Diura, Gray, 468.
Diura briareus. Gray, 472. '
Dixippus, Stai, 461, 462.
cornutus, Kirhy *, 459.
crawangensis, De Haan, 461.
insularis, Kirhy *, 460.
nodosus, De Haan, 46U.
sodalis, Kirhy *, 459.
sumatranus, De Haan, 458,
459.
Donatia, Nardo, 301.
Drassidoe, 310.
Drepanopus, Brady, 73.
furcatus, Brady, 72.
pectinatus, Brady, 73, 74.
Ectinosoma, Boeck, and Bradya,
Boecl; A Eevision of the British
Copepoda belonging to the Genera,
by Thos. Scott and A. Scott, 419-
446.
Ectinosoma, Boecl; 23, 9], 92, 420,
426.
armiferum, T. tj- A. Scott *, 434 ;
mentioned, 420, 443-445.
atlanticum, Brady ^ Roberts.,
91, 420, 437, 438, 443-
446.
Chrystalii, Scott *, 92 ; men-
tioned, 53, 154.
curticorne, Boeck, 420, 430,
431, 443-445.
Edwardsi, Schmeil, 430.
erytbrops, Brady, 420, 431
436, 443-446.'
gracUe, T. Sf A. Scott*, 429
mentioned, 420, 439, 440
442-446.
Herdmani, T. ^ A. Scott*
432; mentioned, 420, 442-
446.
longicorne, T. <J- A. Scott *, 439
mentioned, 420, 443-446.
melaniceps, Boeclc, 434 ; men-
tioned, 92, 420, 442-446.
Normani, T. lJ- A. Scott *, 435
mentioned, 420, 436, 443-
445.
propinquum, T. if- A. Scott*,
428; mentioned, 420, 442-
446.
pygmffum, T. Sf A. Scott *, 433 ;
mentioned, 420, 442-446.
Sarsi, Boecl; 420, 427-432, 434,
437, 438, 442-446.
spinipes, Scott, 92, 42".
INDEX.
533
Ectinosoma tenuipes, T. J,- A. Scott *,
436 ; mentioned, 420, 437,
443-446.
teuuireme, T. ^ A. Scott *, 439 ;
mentioned, 420, 443-446.
Eisothistos vermiformis, Hasw., 264.
Enchytra;idEe, 247.
Enetia, Kirhy, 468.
spinosissima, Kirhy, 46S.
Entomostraca from the Gulf of
Guinea, collected by John Rat-
tray, by Thos. Scott, 1-lGl.
Epeira, Walch., 338.
Eriopis, BruzeKiis, 168, 180, 255.
elongatus, Bnizeliiu; 108, 170.
Eucalauus, Dana, 23, 28, 29.
attenuatus, Dana, 8, 13-23, 28,
29, 30.
setiger, Brady, 8, 14, 15, 16,
20,23,30.'
spinifer, Scott *, 29 : mentioned,
14, 15, 21, 14.5.
Euchteta, Pliilippi, 23, 46, 57.
australis, Brady, 13, 23, 58,
150.
barbata, Brady, 13, IS, 20, 23,
58, 150.
gigas, Brady, 23, 58.
hebes, Gicshr., 59 ; mentioned,
13-16, 19, 20, 60, 150.
, var. valida, Scott *, 60 ;
mentioned, 23, 150.
Hessei, Brady, 23, 46, 58, 59.
, var. similis, Scott *, 58 ;
mentioned, 14, 18, 23, 150.
marina, Prestandrca, 8-23, 57,
59, 60, 107.
pulchra, Luhh., 23, 46, 57.
Euchirella, Gieshr., 23, 45.
messinensis, C'lavs, 14, 15, 20,
23, 45, 150.
Eupalus sanguineus, Truuessart, 479.
Euphausia, Dana, 298.
pellucida, Sars, 298.
Euphausiidse, 285, 297, 299.
Eupodina>, 479.
Eusiroides c^saris, Stehhim/, 237,
262.
Euterpe, Claus, 23, 93.
gracilis. Clans, 23, 93, 94,
156.
, var. armata, Scott *, 93 ;
mentioned, 14, 19-23, 156.
Evadne, Loven, 132, 133.
Nordmanni, Loven, 132, 133.
Eylais extendens, MiiUer, 490, 501,
523.
Fauna of the subterranean waters
of Canterbury (X.Z.), 240-248.
of the Canterbury Plains and
their underground waters, 248-
253.
Food of subterranean animals, 263.
Furcilia, Dana, 298.
Gai'tanus armiyer, Giesbr., 71.
Galeodes arabs, Koch, 307, 319,
3.34, 336, 351, 374, 385,
38G, 407, 409, 412, 413.
aranoides, Fahr., 307, 384, 386 ;
genital apertures of, 386.
ater, Bir., 374, 384, 385 ;
genital apertures of, 386.
barbarus, Lucas, 351, 353.
caspius, Birula, 407.
fatalis, Licht. <|- fferhst, 410. '
gra^cus, Koch, 307.
intrepidus, Savigny, 307, 329,
410.
Galcodida", The Comparative Morph-
ology of the, by H. M. Bernard,
305-417.
Gamasidff, 382, 483, 484, 517, 519.
Gamasus, Latr., 356, 501, 516.
nervous system of, mentioned,
342.
Gammarella, Spence Bate, 255.
Gammarus, Fahr., 226 ; mentioned,
163, 164, 168, 179, 180, 219,
223, 255, 257, 262, 279, 299.
ca3cus, Forel, 171.
Caspary, Pratz, 169.
Ermannii, Afilne-Edtv., 166, 168.
fluviatilis, liiisel, 167, 170, 174,
179, 25b.
{=G. Eoeselii, Gervais),
107.
, var. d'Emmerin, 179,
200, 272.
fossarum, Koch, 168, 171, 255.
fragilis, Chilton, 227 ; men-
tioned, 163, 172, 179-185,
200, 245, 246, 255, 257, 262,
266,269, 283,301.
lacteus, Gervais ^- van Beneden,
166.
lougicaudatus, Costa, 167, 169.
minutus, Gervais, 172.
montanus, Costa, 167.
Gammaru neglectus, G. 0. Sars, 225,
227, 228, 229, 232, 237.
pule.x, Fahr., 165-167, 171-
178, 257, 258, 280.
, var. jun. ?, 167.
, var. subterraneus, Schn.,
178, 179, 260, 272, 279.
pules minutus, Gervais, 166,
174.
pungens, Milne-Edw., 166, 168.
puteauus, Koch, 166-175, 179,
18.5, 274,276,280.
, var. Forelii, Uumhcrt,
174.
recurvLis, Gruhe, 169.
rhipidiophorus, Catta, 173, 274.
lloeselii, Gervais, 166, 167.
( = G. fluviatilis, lioesel),
166.
stygius, Sehiodte, 166.
subterraneus. Leach, 167.
(Niphargus) puteanus, Koch,
174, 276.
GibboceUum, Steck:, ftnote 317, 406.
Glomeris, Latr., 205.
Gluvia, Kuch, 307.
Glyptonotus cntomon, Linn., 301.
Gnathostoma, Thorell, 24.
Goniopelte, Claus, 106.
f/racills, Claus, 106, 108, 109.
Gouiopsyllus, Brady, 10().
rostralHs, Brady, 106, 108, 109.
Goplaua, Wrzesniowski, 180.
Grasffea, Brunner, 448.
Greenia, Kirhy *, 456.
furcatus. Bates, 456.
Gynomera, 133.
Halocypvinai, Dana, 141.
Halocypris, Dana, 132, 133, 141.
a.culeata.,Scott*, 142; mentioned,
132, 160, 161.
atlantiea, Luhh., 132, 141, 142.
brevirostris, Dana, 132, 141.
elongata, Scott*, 141 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160, 161.
imbricata, Brady, 142.
punica, Scott *, 143 ; mentioned,
132, 160, 161.
torosa, Scott *, 142 ; mentione.j
132, 160, 161.
Haplocheira, Hasw., 205.
Harpacticinai, BoecJc, 98.
Harpacticus, Mihic-Edw., 23, 102.
chelifer, MdUer, 23, 102, 157.
534
INDEX.
Harpacticus, Brad}-, 102.
, Clans, 102.
Hemicalanus, Ctaits, 32; mentioned,
8, 23, 31-34.
aculeatiis, Brady, 33.
longicaudatus, Claus, 17, 34.
longicornis. Clans, 32 ; men-
tioned, 8, 13-23, 32, 34, 35,
37, 64.
lonr/isetosiis, Scott MS., 35.
mucronatus, Claus, 33 ; men-
tioned, 15, 18, 20, 23, 33.
orientalis, Brady, 33.
plumosus. Clans, 33 ; mentioned,
13, 17, 21, 23, 145, 150.
Hermarchus, St&l, 448.
"Hermogenes, 8tSl, 456.
cristatus, Kirhy *, 457.
femorata, Stall, 456.
Hosei, Kirhy ^, 457, 475.
personatus. Bates, 456.
verrucosus. Be Haan, 456, 457.
Hersiliodes, Cann, 23, 118.
Livingstoni, Scott *, 118 ; men-
tioned, 22, 158.
Hessella, Brady, 131 ; mentioned, 8,
23.
cyliudrica, Brady, 131 ; men-
tioned, 23.
Heterocalanus, Scott *, 39 ; men-
tioned, 23.
serrieaudatus, Scott, 41 ; men-
tioned, 13, 23, 39, 146.
Heterocha3ta, Clems, 43 ; mentioned,
23.
spinifrons, Clavs, 43 ; men-
tioned, 13-21, 23, 44.
Heteropteryginas, 472.
Heteropteryx anstralis, Kirhy *, 472.
Dehaanii, Westw., 473.
Hyalella, Smith, 254.
Hydrachnidse, 490, 498, 499, 503,
517.
Hydrodroma, Koch, 490, 491, 494,
496, 498, 501.
Hj-menoptera, parasitic, 450.
Hymenosoma lacustris, 301.
Hyperina, Erichs., 204, 206.
Hyssura, Norm, tf- Stehhing, 206,
207, 217, 218.
producta. Norm. S,- Stehhimj, 210.
lanthe, Bovallins, 202, 203, 274.
Ichnosoma, read Ischnosoma. G. 0.
Sars, 203.
Ichtliyophorba, LiUJeh., 77.
violacea, Claus, 78.
Icilius, Dana, 205.
Idotea, Fair., 170, 205, 209.
elongata, xMiers, 205, 208.
lacustris, G. M. Thomson, 253,
254, 300.
Idoteidifi, 204, 206, 207, 208, 214.
Ifionys, Kroi/er, 60.
Ilyopsyllus, Brady ^- Roberts., 101 ;
mentioned, 23.
afflnis, Scott*, 101 ; mentioned,
8, 23, 100, 155.
coriaceus, Brady cj- Roberts.,
101.
Iphigenia, G. M. Thomson, 205.
Iscbnopoda, Grandidier, 466, 468.
brevitarsis, StSl, 466, 468.
episcopalis, Kirhy *, 466.
Phillipsi, Kirhy *, 467, 475.
Reyi, Grandidier, 466.
Ischnosoma, G. 0. Sars, 203.
Isopoda, 163, 167, 185-218.
Itea erassicornis, KocJi, 177.
Ixodes, Latr., 382.
calcaratus, Bir., 406.
Isodida?, 483.
Janira, Risso, 202.
Kirby, W. F., On some new or rare
Phasmid* in the Collection of the
British Museum, 447-475.
Labidocera, Luhb., 82 ; mentioned,
23.
acuta, Dana, 85 ; mentioned,
23, 83.
acutifrons, Dana, 85 ; men-
tioned, 20, 23, 83.
Darwinii, Luhb., 83 ; mentioned,
23, 85, 151.
detruncata, Dana, var., 17, 2.3,
83.
, var. intermedia, Scott *,
82; mentioned, J 3, 14, 17,
151.
Lnhhocldi, Giesbr., S3.
Labidophorus, Kramer, 483.
NicoletieUa, 483.
Laophonte, Philipin, 96 ; mentioned,
23.
brevicornis, Scott *, 97 ; men-
tioned, 123, 155.
curticauda Boeck, 97.
Laophonte longipes,/Sco<<*, 96 ; men-
tioned, 20, 23,, 154.
pygmjca, Scott *, 97 ; men-
tioned, 20, 23, 154.
serrata. Clans, 96; mentioned,
23, 99, 156.
similis, Clems, 97.
Leander fluviatiUs, 301.
Leuckartia, Clans, 44 ; mentioned,
23.
flavicornis, Claus, 44 ; men-
tioned, 13-21, 23.
Lichomolgus, Thorell, 120 ; men-
tioned, 23, 44.
congocnsib, Scott*, 120; men-
tioned, 23, 121, 158.
fucicolus, Brady, 1 20, 121.
propinquus, Scott, 22.
Lilljeborgia, Claus, 98.
linearis, Claus, 98.
Limnoria, LeacJt, 206, 208,
Limnoriidae, 209.
Limnorina, 209.
Limulus, Mailer, 305.
Lonchodes Batesii, Kirhy *, 452.
brevipes. Gray, 453, 462.
Catori, Kirhy *, 454.
furcatus. Bates, 456.
nigropunetatus, Kirhy *, 453.
personatus. Bates, 456.
PfeifFerae, Wesiw., 451.
uniformis, Westw., 462.
virgatus, Kirhy *, 452.
Whiteheadi, Kirhy *, 451.
Lonchodinse, 450, 463.
Longipedia, Clems, 91 ; mentioned,
23.
coronata, Giesbr., 91.
, var. minor, T. & A. Scott,
91.
minor, T. ^- A. Scott, 91 ; men-
tioned, 18, 22, 23, 156.
Longipediinoe, Boeck, 91.
Lubboekia, Claus, 115; mentioned,
23.
squillimana, Claus, 115; men-
tioned, 14-23.
Lumbriculidse, 247.
Lycosa, Latr., 331, 332.
Lysianassidoe, 205.
Lysiopetalum lactarium. Say, 257,
265.
Machairopus, Brady, 104 ; men-
tioned, 23.
INDEX.
535
'Machairopus idyoides, Brady, 104 ;
mentioned, ] 4, 20, 23.
Machilis variabilis, Say, 106.
Maia, Lavr., 298.
Malacostraca, Lair., 166.
llalpighian vessel, 490.
Mantid*, or Praying Insects ( W. F.
Kirhy), 449.
Mantis necydaloides, Linn., 473,
474.
rossia, Fahr., 473.
Mecynocera, /. C. Thomps., 80 ;
mentioned, 23.
Clausi, /. C. Thomps., 80 ; men-
tioned, 15-18, 21, 23, 145,
146.
Megacrania Batesii, Kirhy *, 471.
phelaus, Westw., 470, 471.
Metopa, Boecl; 20 7.
Metridia, Boecl; 41.
Michael, A. D., The Internal Anatomy
of BdeJla, 477-528.
Microstella, Brady i|' Eoberis., 91 ;
mentioned, 23.
atlantica, Brady tf- Eoherts., 91 ;
mentioned, 13-21, 23, 437.
Miracia, Dana, 102 ; mentioned, 23.
efferata, Dana, 102; mentioned,
13-21, 23, 103.
minor, jScoW *, 102 ; mentioned,
28, 104, 155.
Molgus, Dujardin, 478.
Monops, Lubh., 87, 88.
Montagua, Science Bate, 207.
Mornionilla, Gieshr., 64 ; mentioned,
23.
phasma, Gieshr., 64 ; mentioned,
18, 21, 151.
Munna, Kroyer, 203, 275.
Munnopsis, Hars, 205.
Mygale, Latr., 338, 378.
brain of, mentioned, 344.
Myodocopa, 134, 140.
Myronides Pfeiffera>, var. (?), Westxv.,
451.
Mysidopsis incisa, Sars, 301.
Mysis, Latr., 298.
Naidomorpha, 247.
Nauplius, Miiller, 297.
New Zealand, the Subterranean
Crustacea of : with some General
Remarks on the Fauna of Caves
and Wells, by Chas. Chilton, 163-
284.
Niphargus, Schiodte, 164-170, 173-
180, 218-225, 245, 251, 254, 255,
258, 259, 263.
a.<\u\\e-s., Schiodte, 165-173, 179.
caspius, Grimm, 174, 175.
croaticus, Jui-inac, 178.
fontatius, Spence Bate, 168, 169,
172, 266, 276.
Forelii, Humbert, 175, 177, 252,
258, 260 ( = N. puteanus,
A'ot7i, var. Forelii, Humbert),
258.
Kochianus, Spence Bate, 168,
169, 171, 172, 276.
Monie/.i, Wrze'sniowski, 180.
montanus, G. M. Tliomson,
ftnote 254, 285, 301.
Mortoni, G. M. Thomson, ftnote
254.
orcinus, Joseph, 170, 176, 177.
pontious, Cxei-niavski, 169, 175.
puteanus, Spence Bate, 168,
173-180,222,226,237,261,
274, 277, 278.
, var. Forelii, Humbert, 165,
166, 171, 173,175,177,226,
230-258, 277.
, var. onesiensis, 173, 179.
-, var. Vejdovskyi, Wrze'-
nioirski, 180.
ratisbonensis, Wrzeiniowski,
166.
Btygius, ScJdudte, 167, 168, 169,
171, 172, 177.
subterrancus, £<?«<■/;, =puteanus,
C. Koch, 171.
tatrensis, Wrzdiiioivsli, 172,
ISO.
Nogagus, Leach, 130 ; mentioned,
23.
validus, Dana, 130 ; mentioned,
23.
Obisium, JIL, 325.
Oithona, Baird, S^.^ ■ mentioned, 23,
90.
Challcngeri, Brady, 89 ; men-
tioned, 13-21, 23, 89-91.
minuta, Scott *, 90 ; mentioned,
8, 22, 23, 153.
plumifera, Dana, 89 ; mentioned,
22, 23, 90.
setigera, Dana, 91 ; mentioned,
14, 15, IS, 21-23.
spinirostiis, CJaus. 90.
Oligochfeta, 247.
Oncaja, PhiJippi, 23, 116.
gracilis, Dana, 116 ; mentioned,
13, 14, 18, 21, 23, 157.
mediterranea, Claus, 117 ; men-
tioned, 14, 23, lis, 157.
obtusa, Dana, 116 ; mentioned,
8, 13-22, 117, 118.
venusta, ? Philippi, 116.
Oniscidffi, 167, 206.
Opilionidae, 344.
Opisthophthalmus, Koch, 317.
Orgia antiqua, Linn., 404.
OribatidK, 382, 481, 485, 506, 517.
Oronectes, 201.
Orthppsyllus, Brady <S,- Eoherts., 98.
linearis, Brady & Eoherts., 98.
Orthoptera, 448, 449.
Ostracoda, 132, 133.
Pachysoma, Claus, 119 ; mentioned,
23".
punetatum, Claus, 119; men-
tioned, 23, 15S.
Palaeophonus, Thorell S,- Lindstrom,
310, 328,392.
nuncius, Thorell 4' Lindstrijm,
311, 407.
Palinurus, Fahr., 278, 300.
Palophina?, 464, 465, 46S.
Palophus, Westw., 465.
centaurus, Westw., 405.
Haworthii, Gray, 465.
minotaurus, Gerstaeclcer, 405.
Paracalanus, Boech, 26 ; mentioned,
23.
parvus, Clans, 20 ; mentioned,
15-22, 27, 145.
pygmoeus, Claus, 27 ; mentioned,
23, 26, 28, 144.
Paracartia, Scott *, 68 ; mentioned,
23.
dubia, Scott *, 69 ; mentioned,
22, 23, 70, 154.
spinicaudata, .Sc(j<<*, 69; men-
tioned, 22, 23, (i7, 68, 70,
152.
Paraiiephrops. White, 27S,
Paranthura, Westtu., 176, 205, 210,
262.
australis, Hasw., 21 1.
costana, Spence Bate, 213, 214,
217, 275.
neglecta, Beddard, 210.
nigi;opunptata, Lucas, 210.
536
INDEX.
Penilia, Dana, 132, 133.
orientalis, Dana, 132, 133.
Penilidfe, 133.
Peatastomum teretiusculum, Bainl,
406.
Perlamorpha , Brunner, 475.
, Serv., 475.
Perlamorphus, Gray, 475.
hi(rogJijpMciis, Curt. MS., 475.
peleus, Grail, '^'''S.
Phaiinna, Clans, 81 ; mentioned,
23.
spinifera, Claris, 81 ; mentioned,
13, 14, 17, IS, 20, 23, 82,
151.
PhalangidsB, 312, 314, 321, 348.
Phalangium, Linn., 343.
Phanocles, Stm, 464.
Pharnacia, 8M, 448.
ponderosa, Stal, 451.
serratipes, Gray, 448, 450.
Phasgauia, Kirly*, 461, 462.
Everetti, Kirhy*, 461; men-
tioned, 475.
Phasma, llliger, 473, 474.
calcaratum, De Haan, 463.
femorata, Stoll, 456.
gallicum, Charpen., 447.
necj'daloides, Linn., 473, 474.
nodosum, De Haan, 458.
rosea, Stoll, 472.
rossia, Fahr., 473.
sumatranum, De Haan, 458.
verrucosum, De Haan, 456.
(Acanthodcrus) vernicosum, De
Haan, 456.
(Bacteria) nodosum, De Haan,
458.
Phasmidfe, On some new or rare, in
the Collection of the British Mu-
seum, by W. F. Kirby, 447-475.
Phasminfe, 474, 475.
Pherusa, Leach, 167, 177, 233,
234.
alba, Koch, 167, 177.
ca?rulea, G. M. TJwmson, 235,
253, 254, 256, 257, 258, 262,
301.
Phibalosoma calametum, Bates, 463.
serratipes, Westw., 450.
Phlyctenophora, Brachj, 135 ; men-
tioned, 132.
africana,<SVo?<*, 135; mentioned,
132, 161.
Phreatoicidffi, 185, 209, 244.
Phreatoicus, Chilton, 185 ; mentioned,
163, 176, 181, 202-207, 244, 245,
256, 257, 262, 266, 269, 271,
286.
assimilis, Chilton *, 186 : men-
tioned, 163, 176, 181, 185,
195-201, 255, 258, 262,
281.
australis, Chilton, 176, 181, 188-
191, 195, 199-204, 207, 253,
258, 262, 286, 301.
typicus, Chilton, 196 ; men-
tioned, 163, 172, 176, 180-
196, 200-204, 255, 262, 281,
286.
Phreodrilidoe, 247.
Phreodrihis, Beddard, 247.
subterraneus, Beddard, 246, 247,
259.
Phreoryctes Smithii, Beddard, 246.
Phreotoicus, read Phreatoicus, 247.
Phrynida;, 326.
Phrynus, Latr., 312, 313, 316, 318,
326, 337, 338, 348, 357.
Phyllium, Illiger, 447.
Phyllopus, Brady, 74 ; mentioned,
23.
bidentatus, Brady, 74 ; men-
tioned, 13, IS, 150.
Pinnotheres, Latr., 268.
Platyarthrus, Brandt, 168.
HofFmannseggii, Brandt, 168,
177.
Schciblii, Brandt, 177.
stygius, Joseph, 177.
Platycopa, 134.
Platy crania alpheus, var.. Bates,
471.
phelaus, Westiv., 470.
Platyscelida;, 204.
Pleuromma, Claus, 41 ; mentioned,
23.
abdominale, Ltibb., 41 ; men-
tioned, 8, 13-23, 42, 43.
gracile, Claus, 42 ; mentioned,
23, 150.
princeps, Scott*, 42 ; mentioned,
17, 23, 147.
Pleuronectes limanda, Linn., 431.
Podocopa, 134, 144.
Poduridae, 480.
PcBcilostoma, 110.
Polydesmus, Latr., 265.
Polyphemidfe, 133.
Pontarachna, Phil., 490.
Pontella, Dana, 85 ; mentioned, 23,
68, ><2.
acuta, Dana, 85.
acntifrons, Dana, 85.
inermis, Brady, 85 ; mentioned,
21, 22, 24,"86.
mediterranea, Claus, 86 ; men-
tioned, 24, 87, 151.
, var. gaboonensis, Scott *,
86.
plumata, Brady, 89.
securifera, Brady, 86 ; men-
tioned, 21, 22,^24.
turgida, Dana, 89.
PontellidsB, 40.
Pontellina, Dana, 88 ; mentioned,
24.
mediterranea, Claus, 86.
plumata, Dana, 88 ; mentioned,
13-20, 24, 89.
PontellinsB, 82.
Pontellopsis, Brady, 87 ; mentioned,
24.
villosa, Brady, 87 ; mentioned,
14, 21, 22, 24, 88, 151.
Pontia, Milne-Ediv., 85.
Pontia brassicffi, Linn., 487.
Pontocypris, G. 0. Sars, 136 ; men-
tioned, 132.
subreniformis, Scott *, 136 ;
mentioned, 132.
trigonella, G. 0. Sars, 136 ; men-
tioned, 132.
Pontopsj'Uus, /Scoii*, 131 ; mentioned,
24.
elongatus, Scott *, 131 ; men-
tioned, 24.
Potamopyrgus, Stimps., 248.
autipodum. Gray, 246.
, var. spelsea, Frauenf., 246.
Praying Insects, 449.
Presbistiis, Kirhy *, 475.
peleus, Gray, 475.
Prisomera, Gray, 456.
spinicollis. Gray, 456.
Promachus, St&I, 449.
doreyanus, Bates, 464.
sordidus, Kirhy *, 463, 475.
Prostigmata, 479, 480, 481, 488.
Pseudanthessius, Claus, 121 ; men-
tioned, 24.
propinquua, Scott *, 121 ; men-
tioned, 24, 158.
ThoreUi, Brady, 121.
Pseudophasma, Kirhy *, 473, 474.
INDEX.
537
Pseudophasma necydaloides, Linn.,
473, 474.
Pseiidophasmiiia?, 473, 474.
Pseudosforpionidie, 308, 314, 3:i4.
Pseudotremia, Co^je, 2(51.
cavernarum, Cope, 257, 265.
Rattray, John, Ecport on Entomo-
straea from the Gulf of Guinea,
collected by (Thos. Scott), 1-161.
, Introductory Remarks, 2.
Reproductive organs of Galeodids,
384.
Rhaphidorus, Serv., 470.
Khax, Hcnn., 307-309, 313, 318,
326, 346, 349-355.
melana, Koch, 347.
nig;rocincta, Bernard, 384
termes, Karsch, 407.
Rhincalanus, Dana, 30 ; mentioned,
24, 32.
aculeatus, Scott *, 31 ; men-
tioned, 24, 32, 146.
cornutus, Dana, 30 ; mentioned,
8, 13-22, 24,31, 40.
gigas, Brady, 31.
Ruppia maritima, mentioned, 264,
260.
Saphir, Linn., 106.
rostratus, Linn., 106.
Saphirella, Scott*, 126; mentioned,
24.
abyssicola, Scott *, 126 ; men-
tioned, 17, 24. 158, 159.
Saphirina, /. C. Thomps., 122; men-
tioned, 24.
(yUndrica, Lubb., 125.
elec/nns, Lubb., 122.
inaequalis, Dana, 122; men-
tioned, 16-22, 24.
metallina, Dana, 125 ; men-
tioned, 13-21, 24, 156.
nigromaculata, Claus, 18, 122.
opaca, Lxdih., 124 ; mentioned,
15-19, 24.
opalina, Dana, 123; mentioned,
15, 19, 22, 24.
ovalis, Dana, 122; mentioned,
13-19, 24.
eerrata, Bradi/, 123 ; mentioned,
17, 20, 21,' 24.
sinuicauda, Brady, 125 ; men-
tioned, 24.
SECOND SERIES. — ZOOLOGY, VOL
Saphirina splendcns, Dana, 124 ;
mentioned, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22,
24.
stellata, Gieshr., mentioned,
122.
stijUfera, Lubb., 113, 126.
ThoiHSoni, Lubb., 123.
Saphirinella, Claus, 126 ; mentioned,
24.
pellucida, Claus, 113.
styUfera, Lulih., 126; mentioned,
13-22, 24.
Sarsiella, Norm., 140 ; mentioned,
132.
Murrayana, Scott *, 140 ; men-
tioned, 132, 160, 161.
SchizonotidiB, 314.
Schizonotus, 30s, 310, 313, 324,
326.
Schizopod, On a Freshwater, from
Tasmania, by G. M. Thomson, 2So-
303.
Scolecithrix, Brady, 47 ; mentioned,
24, 48.
ahyssalis, Giesbr., 52.
affiuis, Dana, 51.
Bradyi, Gieshr., 51 ; mentioned,
13-20, 24, 149.
ctenopus, Gieshr., 48 ; mentioned,
13-18, 24, 49.
Danae, Lubb., 49 ; mentioned,
13-22, 24, 47-55.
dubia, Gieshr., .53 ; mentioned,
24, 147.
latipes, Scott *, 52 ; mentioned,
24, 147, 149.
longicornis, Scott *, 50 ; men-
tioned, 17, 24, 140.
major, Scott *, 52 ; mentioned,
24, 147, 149.
minor, Brady, 50 ; mentioned,
13, 16, 21, 24.
securifrons, Scott *, 47 ; men-
tioned, 13, 24, 47, 50, 51,
148, 149.
simidans, Scott MS., .53.
tenuipes, Scott*, 48 ; mentioned,
13, 14, 18, 149.
turaida, Scott *, 52 ; mentioned,
24, 53, 147.
Scorpio, Litm., 312, 314, 316, 324.
ScorpionidsB, 308, 314, 348.
Scott, Andrew, A Revision of the
British C'opepoda belonging to the
Genera Bradya, Boecl; and Ecti-
VI.
nosoma, BoecJc: see Scott, Thos.,
419-446.
Scott, Thos., Report on Entomostraca
from tho Gulf of Guinea, collected
by John Rattray, 1-161.
Scott, Thos., & Scott, A., A Revision
of the British Copepoda belonging
to the Genera Bradya, BoecL; and
Ectinosoma, Boeck, 419-446.
Sense-organs of Galeodidae, 345.
Serpukc, 264.
Setella, Dana, 109 ; mentioned,
24.
gracilis, Dana, 1U9 ; mentioned,
13-21, 24.
Siphonostoma, Erichs., 127.
Solpuga, Uerhst, 307, 309, 311.
fiaveseens, Koch, 353.
paludicolla, Pucock, 407.
" Spectres," 447.
Sphferoma, Latr., 300.
Sphtcromidac, 209.
Sphinx ligustri, Linn., 487.
Stenetrium, 202, 205.
Stenhelia, Boeck, 95 ; mentioned, 24,
99.
accraensis, Seott *, 95 ; men-
tioned, 19, 24, 154.
hispida, Brady, mentioned,
96.
ima, Brady, mentioned, 96.
Stenheliina3, 95.
Stenothoe, Dana, 207.
Sthenobasa tuberculata, Kirhy*,
462.
" Stick Insects," 447.
Stratocles bogotensis, Kirhy *, 474.
Stygobromus, Cope, 218.
vitreus, Cojie, 170, 172, 178.
Subterranean animals, food of,
263.
Crustacea of Xew Zealand ;
with some general Remarks on the
Fauna of Caves and Wells, by
Chas. Chilton, 163-284.
Crustacea, origin of, 2.53-
259.
Fauna, special characters of
the, 259-268.
— — , arrested development, 265.
, colour, 259.
, compensation for loss of
eyesight, 261.
, habits, 265.
, loss of eyes, 260.
73
538
INDEX.
Subterranean Life, bearln<2:s of tlie
phenomena of, on the Theory of
Descent, 2G6-272.
Waters of Canterbury (N.Z.),
Fauna of, 248-253.
Tachidiinfe, 93.
Tanaidip, 204, 205, 206. 207.
Tanais Oerstedii, Kroyer, 205, 274.
Tarantula tessellata, Pococh, 312.
Tasmania, On a Freshwater Schizopod
from, by G. M. Thomson, 285-
303.
Temora, Baird, 75 ; mentioned, 24.
armata, Claus, 77.
dubia, Liihh., mentioned, 21, 22.
duhki, Brady, 75.
finmarchica, Baird, 70.
longicornis, Miiller, 76 ; men-
tioned, 16-22, 24, 1.53.
stylifera, Dana, 75 ; mentioned,
8, 13-20, 76, 77.
Temoropia, Scott *, 79 ; mentioned,
24.
mayumbaensis, Scott*, 79 ; men-
tioned, 24, 153.
Thalestris, Clans, 100 ; mentioned,
24.
forficula, Claus, 100; mentioned,
24, 101, 157.
Thaumatopsyllus, Scott MS.. 104.
Thelyphonidte, 308, 314, 326.
Thelyphonus, Latr., mentioned, 310-
316, 318, 324, 326, 337,338, 348,
355, 356.
Theory of Descent, bearings of the
phenomena of Subterranean Life
on the, 266-272.
Theridion, Walch, 247.
Thomson, George M., On a Freshwater
Schizopod from Tasmania, 285-
303.
Thrasyllus, Stdl, 455.
macilentus, Stdl, 455.
Thyas, Koch, 491, 496, 500, 501,
507.
petrophilus, Michael, mentioned,
486, 490-504, 507, 523.
Thysanopodidae, 285.
ThysauuridK. 480, 488.
Titanethes, Schiodte, 167, 175, 177.
albus, Schiodte, 167, 168.
albus (=Pherusa alba, Koch),
177.
alpieola, Heller, 177.
brevicornis, Joseph, 1 77.
feneriensis, Parona, 175, 177,
278.
fracticornis, Joseph, 177.
graniger, Frivcddsl-y, 177.
TrachysphiEra, Heller, 265.
S'chmidtii, Helle.r, 265.
Triarthrus Beckii, Green, 380.
Trichodactylus anonymus, Berlese,
501.
Trinra, TellTcampf, 166.
cavernicola, Telllccnnpf, 166.
TrombidiidK, 479, 480, 481, 488,
499, 517.
Trombidium, Fahr., 334, 482-496,
501, 504, 512, 515, 518.
Trombidium fuliginosum, Herni., 489,
490, 498, 501, 503, 507, 511,512,
523.
Tryphosa antennipotens, StehUng,
237.
Typhloniscus, Salt., 168, 177.
ateimi, ScJibbl, 168, 175, 177.
stygins, Joseph, 177.
Tyroglyphida-, 485, 501.
Tyroglyphus, Lcttr., 494.
Undina, Dana, 44; mentioned, 24,46.
Danee, Lubb., 49.
Darwini, Lid)h., 45.
longipes, Lubb., 45.
messinensis, Clans, 46.
pulchra, Lubb., 57.
vulgaris, Dana, 44 ; mentioned,
8, 13-22, 24, 45.
Vasilissa, Kirbi/ *, 468.
Walkeri, Eirh)/ *, 469.
Vermilia, Lam., 264.
VorticeUa, Linn., 246.
" Walking Sticks," 447
Xenomaches, Kirhy *, 470.
incommodiis, Butler, 470.
Xestoleberis, 0. 0. Sars, 139 ; men-
tioned, 132.
margaritea, Brady, 139 ; men-
tioned, 132.
rRINTED BY TAYLOE AND FKAKCIS, BED LION COURT, FLEET STKEET.
ERRATA.
Page 132, line 17, for pumilla read pumila, Scott.
Page 203, line 33, for Iclinosoma read Ischiiosoma.
Page 209, line 8, for Sphaeronidse read SjjhEeromidae.
Page 247, line 22, for Phreotoicus read Phreatoicus.
Page 280, first line, for vol. xxiv. read vol. xxix.
Page 468, line 20, for Ann. Nat. Hist. (5) viii. p. 151 (1891) read (6) viii. &c.
LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON.
JIEMUilANDA CUNCEKNING TllAXSACTIONS.
The First Series of the Transactions, coutaiiiing both Botanical and Zoological contributions, has been completed
in 30 Vols., and a few entire sets are still for sale. Only certain single volumes, or parts to complete sets, may be
obtained at the original prices. The price of the Index to Vols. 1-25 is 8s. to the public, and its. to Fellows; to
Vols. 20-30, 4s. to the public, and 3.5. to Fellows.
The Second Series of the Transactions is divided into Zoological and Botanical sections. The prices of the
Zoological parts of these which have been published are as undermentioned (for the Botanical parts see Botanical
■wrapper) : —
^^'l]en Price to tlie
Volume. Published. Public.
£ «. (/.
Second Series. — Zoology.
[. Part I. 1875 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1875 0 6 0 .
Part III. 187G 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1877 0 16 0 .
Part V. 1877 0 18 0 .
Part VI. 1877 1 2 0 .
Part VII. 1878 1 16 0 .
Part VIII. 1879 1 0 0 .
II. Part I. 1879 1 4 0 .
Part II. 1881 0 15 0 .
Part III. 1882 1 8 0 .
Part IV. 1882 0 7 0 .
Part V. 1882 0 3 0 .
Part VI. 1883 1 0 0 .
Part VII. 1883 0 5 0 .
Part VIII. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part IX. 1883 0 3 0 .
Part X. 1884 0 4 6 .
Part XI. 1884 0 10 0 .
Part XII. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XIII. 1884 0 6 0 .
Part XIV. 1885 0 6 0 .
Part XV. 18S5 0 4 6 .
Part XVI. 1885 0 5 0 .
Part XVII. 1886 0 3 0 .
Part XVIII. 1888 0 2 6 .
III. Part I. 1884 1 14 0 .
Part II. 1884 1 12 0 .
Price to
Fellows.
£ s. d.
0 18 0
When Price to the
runlislied. Public.
£ s. d.
Second Series. — Zuologv (coiidnued).
in. Part III. 1885 1 10 0
Part IV. 1885 0 8 0 . . . .
Part V. 1887 0 8 0
Part VI. 1888 0 6 0
IV. Part I. 1886 1 4 0 , . . .
Part II. 1887 1 8 0
Part III. 1888 0 16 0 . . . .
V. Part I. 1888 0 12 0
Part II. 1888 0 5 0 . . . .
Part III. 1889 1 7 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1890 0 12 0 . . . .
Part V. 1890. . . .■. 0 6 0
Part VI. 1891 0 12 0 .. ..
Part VII. 1891 0 6 0 ....
Part VIII. 1892 0 8 0 ....
Part IX. 1892 0 12 0 . . . .
Part X. 1893 1 8 0
Part XI. 1894 0 2 6 . . . .
VI. Part I. 1894 2 0 0 . . . .
Part 11. 1894 1 11 0 ....
Part III. 1894 0 10 0 . . . .
Part IV. 1890 1 4 0 . . . .
Part V. 1896 0 10 0 . . . .
Part VI. 1896 0 8 0 . . . .
Part VII. 1896. . . . 0 12 0 . . . .
Part VIII. 1897 0 2 6 . . . .
VII. Part I. 1896 0 10 0 . . . .
Price to
Fellows.
0 4 6
0 9 0
3 2044 072 224 405
Date Due
^-tB 2 11968
yiM^^i
^
r«'-4*Ji^
I- . f-J-.-.
W^. mM **^ ..'■^
<*^%
■-'-^ -^^
'-""^v
'-^J^
t.cr^
*-f^':
'^Jk,
r^m
■ -S
itti-.*^
M%..
\ r^-'.