Price .50
August/September 1973
Volume 2, Number 3
Published by the Friends of the National Zoo
Published by
Friends of the National Zoo
National Zoological Park
Washington, D.C. 20009
Phones:
Executive Director and membership:
232-7700
Educational and Editorial offices:
232-7703
Guided tours: 232-7703
Train tours: 232-7704
Window Shop: 232-7705
FONZ Board of Directors 1972-1973
Peter C. Andrews, President
Arthur Arundel, Vice President
Emanuel Boasberg, Treasurer
Joan L. Jewett, Secretary
~Fheodore Babbitt
Amy Block
Montgomery S. Bradley
John S. Brown
Timothy V.A. Dillon
Ronald Field
Donna K. Grosvenor
Stephen Hosmer
Robert Mason
Isabel J. McDonnell
Shirley J. McNair
Lavell Merritt
Ruth N. Nelson
John B. Oliver
Mary Poole
Nancy Porter
Gerald G. Wagner
Rosa M. Walker
Richardson White, Jr.
Executive Director
Warren J. lliff
Editor: Austin Hughes
Photograph on p. 10 by Pat Vosburgh;
all other photographs by Ray Faass.
THE ZOOGOER is published bi-monthly
and copyrighted © by Friends of the National
Zoo, c/o National Zoological Park, Washington,
D.C. 20009. second-class mailing permit
approved at Washington, D.C. Rate
in the United States $3 a year.
Golden Marmoset Twins
Zoo News — Mammals
Zoo News — Birds
_ Zoo Map
Zoo News — Reptiles and Amphibians
Rattlesnakes
Zoo Staff
Dr. Theodore H. Reed, Director
Mr. Edward Kohn, Deputy Director
Mr. John Perry, Assistant Director
Mr. Jaren Horsley, General Curator
Mr. Harold Egoscue, Curator
(Small Mammals and Primates)
Mr. William Xanten, Curator
(Large Carnivores and Large Mammals)
Mr. Guy Greenwell, Curator
(Birds)
Mr. Larry Collins, Assistant Curator
(Small Mammals and Primates)
Mr. Miles Roberts, Assistant Curator
(Large Mammals)
Mr. Michael Davenport, Assistant Curator
_ (Reptiles)
Miss Judy Block, Technician
(Animal Records)
Mr. Michael Johnson, Technician
(Reptiles)
Mr. Lee Schmeltz, Technician
(Reptiles)
Mr. Horsley has requested that any calls
concerning the collection be directed to his office
(381-7283 or 381-7284) and the appropriate staff
member will respond. Calls for general information
should be directed to Mr. Saul Schiffman, Division -
of Interpretation, at 381-7228 or 381-7256.
Friends
of
the
National
The Friends of the National Zoo is a non-profit
organization of individuals and families who
frequently visit the National Zoo and who are
interested in supporting its growth and develop-
ment, particularly in the areas of education,
conservation, and scientific research.
As members of the Friends, you and your family
will be given benefits that will make your zoo-
going more enjoyable and educational.
For more information and a membership appli-
cation, please call 232-7700.
On June 11th and 16th twins were born to two
pairs of adult golden marmosets at the Zoo’s
Small Mammal Building (number 75 on map).
This is a rare and endangered species, and the
National Zoo is involved in a concerted effort
to breed it in captivity. There are estimated
to be only about 500 golden marmosets still
living in the wild in the species’ native Brazil;
of only about 100 in the world’s zoos, 17 are.
now located at the National Zoological Park.
As far as is known, the golden marmoset
(Leontideus rosalia) has always had a re-
stricted habitat. In historic times it has been
found only in a narrow strip of mountainous
rain forest approximately 300 miles long and
60 miles wide contained within the states of
Rio de Janeiro and Espirito Santo, Brazil.
Today its range has been reduced considerably,
and it is only known to occupy an area of
about 300 square miles around the lower
reaches of the Sao Joao River in Rio de Janeiro
State, although other isolated pockets may
JEXISE,
There have been a number of reasons for the
decline of these uniquely beautiful primates.
The size of their habitat has been steadily
decreased by the destruction of forests for
agriculture and by the spread of urbanization
that has characterized the history of eastern
Brazil. A further decimating factor has been
the captive animal trade. Since its discovery
by Europeans its long golden fur made this
species a popular pet, although, due to their
highly specialized dietary and climatic require-
ments, few of the captives survived long. More
recently zoos in Europe and North America
played a large role in exporting the animals;
and in all too many cases their knowledge
proved inadequate to provide proper care. The
result was that few of the captive golden mar-
mosets bred, and the demand for more exhibit
animals continued to raid the wild population.
‘As recently as 1966, there was evidence that
200 to 300 golden marmosets were being
exported annually to zoos.
In that year, fortunately, measures were begun
to halt exportation, when the American Asso-
ciation of Zoological Parks and Aquariums
blacklisted the species. In 1967 a Brazilian law
was passed regulating export, and inclusion
of the golden marmoset under the United
States Rare and Endangered Species Act put
an end to importation to this country. The
few golden marmosets remaining in captivity
in this country were concentrated in a small
number of zoos, including the National Zoo,
where intensive efforts to breed them were
begun.
The golden marmoset belongs to a small family
of exclusively New World primates known as
the Callithricidae — the name means ‘“‘beautiful
hair’’ — or, in English, the marmosets and
tamarins. Other representatives of this family
at the Small Mammal House are the cottontop
marmoset (Saguinus oedipus), the moustached
tamarin (Saguinus mystax), and Geoffroy’s
marmoset (Saguinus geoffroyi). (The latter
two species also currently have young.) The
Callithricidae evidently represent an offshoot
of the stock that eventually led to the true
New World monkeys (family Cebidae). In some
respects they are more primitive than the
Cebidae; for instance they have never
developed the prehensile tail seen in several
members of that family. But the members of
the marmoset family have developed some
quite distinctive specializations of their own
that cannot be considered a primitive
condition.
Marmosets, for instance, have lost the opposa-
bility of the thumb that was surely possessed
by their ancestors. One reason for this is prob-
ably that they have come to rely far less on
hand-over-hand climbing than their ancestors
did. Rather, their distinctive mode of prog-
ress through the trees is by means of short
agile leaps in which the strong legs supply
the major element of propulsion, though all
four limbs are involved. This springing loco-
motion is particularly suited to the typical
marmoset habitat — the highest levels of the
tropical forest canopy. There the branches
are small, and the marmoset can grasp one
between leaps by means of its feet, the big toes
of which are fully opposable, while steadying
itself by holding on to that branch or another
with its hands. In addition, when walking quad-
rupedally along a branch, it can hold on with
its feet, while cupping its hands around the
branch in front. Nevertheless, when necessary
the marmoset is able to support itself hanging
by its hands for a short time, holding the
fingers together to form a hook.
The marmoset’s hands are admirably adapted
for capturing and holding insects and other
small prey, which are caught one-handed and
held between the flexed fingers and the palm.
In social grooming — which plays something
of the same important role in maintaining the
fur and cementing social bonds that it does in
other primates — the marmoset parts the fur
with its hands and removes alien particles from
the body of the animal it is grooming by
means of its lips, rather than picking them out
with its hands as is usual among primates with
opposable thumbs. In grooming its own fur,
the marmoset uses its feet as well as its hands.
In addition to their main diet of insects and
such other small invertebrates as spiders,
golden marmosets in the wild eat some small
vertebrates, fruit, and other vegetable matter.
At the National Zoo golden marmosets are
given a specially prepared marmoset diet sup-
plemented with vitamin D-3 along with fruits,
green vegetables, meal worms, crickets, and
young mice. The vitamin D-3 supplement is
particularly important for captive marmosets
that do not have the access to direct sunlight
that they would have in their natural tree top
habitat.
As visitors will notice in the case of the Zoo’s
recently born pair of twins, the family Calli-
thricidae are unusual among primates in their
reproductive biology. The fact that twinning
is by far the most common form of marmoset
birth in itself sets them apart from monkeys
and apes, among which, as among humans,
twin births are an exception; in the marmosets,
however, they are the rule, with single and
triple births occurring only rarely. The care of
the young is still more unusual. In all of the
marmoset species studied so far, after the first
several days of life the young are carried by
the father, clinging to the long fur of his back,
flanks, or shoulders. In most primates the
young cling only to the mother. The marmoset
father transfers the young to the mother for
nursing, which continues until they are about
three months old. Each nursing lasts about
fifteen minutes, after which the young are
returned to the father.
Immediately after giving birth, the mother
golden marmoset is usually quite hostile
towards the male and other members of the
group. She will not allow them near the infants
and may growl or attack them if they attempt
to approach. In captivity this may be parti-
cularly noticeable if she is feeding, when she
may drive off other group members from the
feed tray. However, after a period that may
vary from only one to eleven or twelve days,
but is usually about eleven or twelve days,
the female allows the father to approach her
and take charge of the young. It has been sug-
gested that the deciding factor may be the
mother’s strength; if she has been especially
weakened by giving birth, it will be much
sooner that she is willing to relinquish charge
of the young.
In weaning the young, the parents provide
small amounts of food, which the infants
remove from their hands or mouth. Though
they leave the father for short periods of time
long before weaning, it is not until they are
four months old that they are fully weaned
and fully independent of him. Thereafter
they return and cling to his fur only when in
danger or in search of warmth. Initially the
weaned juveniles are tolerated by the parents.
In fact the basic golden marmoset social unit
in the wild is believed to consist of an adult
breeding pair, their juvenile or young adult
offspring of one or two years previous, and
their current infants. Both of the Zoo’s recent
sets of twins were born in such groups, con-
taining juveniles born the previous year.
In the wild each group of this sort maintains
a territory, which is apparently demarcated
by scent. The golden marmoset has scent
glands on its chest which it rubs against
branches to mark them. The secretions of
other glands in the circumgenital area, mixed
with a few drops of urine, are also used. When
the young mature they are gradually driven
from the group, young males mainly by the
adult male and young females by the adult
female. Young males will seek to establish
territories of their own.
The National Zoo has had considerable success
in breeding this species. However, the Zoo
has not yet produced any offspring the
parents of which were both themselves bred
in Captivity; producing such offspring will be
necessary if captive breeding is going to play
a role in the survival of this species. Hopefully
it will be accomplished in a new off-exhibit
breeding facility, which will house the Zoo’s
golden marmosets, except for a small number
that will remain in the Small Mammal House.
*There the marmosets will be under intensive
study, and it is hoped that what will be
learned about their behavior and physiology
will further the international effort to save
the golden marmoset from extinction.
A SOINEMS
Mammals
White-Cheeked Gibbon Born
A white-cheeked gibbon (Hy/obates concolor)
was born July 9th in one of the large outdoor
“corn-crib”’ cages in the Monkey House, area
(number 22b on map). A birth of this species
in Captivity is a very rare event, and the
infant’s development promised to be interesting
to observe for a number of other reasons. At
birth the young gibbon’s rather sparse fur had
the pale yellowish tint of its mother’s;
but the bare skin of its ears, face, and belly
was pinkish rather than black like her skin.
The Zoo’s white-cheeked gibbon infant, nursing as
it clings to its mother.
From the first day of life it was able to hold
on to the fur of its mother’s lower abdomen,
holding on with both its hands and feet.
The gibbons, family Hylobatidae, are a
distinctive group of primates found only in
Southeast Asia and the Malay Archipelago.
It was once believed that they were closely
related to the great apes — the gorilla, orangu-
tan, and chimpanzee — and they were placed in
the same family with these other tailless pri-
mates. Recently, however, most zoologists
have tended to emphasize the marked di ffer-
ences between the gibbons and the great apes
and to see the gibbons as an only rather dis-
tantly related group that has become highly
and uniquely specialized for an arboreal
existence in which the primary means of
locomotion is swinging by the hands.
In its progress from branch to branch and
from tree to tree, the gibbon holds its hands
around the branches like hooks. The body is
swung on the long arms in such a way as to
build up momentum for leaps from one branch
to another. This form of locomotion, which ts
known as brachiation, requires that the body
axis be kept vertical, and the gibbon has
evolved a more upright body posture than any
other primate except man. Adult gibbons, in
fact, when they do walk on the ground or
along a wide horizontal branch, always do so
bipedally, with the long arms raised high
above the head. It was once thought that
human ancestors developed an upright posture
along a similar evolutionary path and then
“‘descended from the trees’’; but more recent
theories have suggested that our earliest ances-
tors never progressed as brachiators anywhere
near as far as the gibbons have and evolved
ground-dwelling habits before developing a
fully upright stance.
The young gibbon’s ability to cling unaided to
the mother is clearly a necessary adaptation
to its arboreal way of life, since the mother’s
hands are seldom free to provide support for
her infant. And when it does begin at the age
of about four months to leave its mother for
short periods, brachiation is reported to be the
first mode of locomotion it adopts. However,
it does not at first swing to gain momentum
for leaping as adults do, but proceeds by
cautiously reaching for and taking hold of
each branch. When it does move on the
ground it does so at first by means of short
four-footed jumps and only a good deal later
does it learn to walk bipedally. By the time it
is seven to eight months old, the young
gibbon has learned most of the locomotory
patterns of the adult, although it is still reluc-
tant to take long leaps — which in the adult
may reach more than 30 feet.
Hylobates concolor, the white-cheeked, Indo-
chinese, or crested gibbon occurs in three color
phases. In that represented at the National
Zoo, the adult male is black with white cheek
“whiskers,” as is the father of the recent
young, currently separated from the female
and located at the Monkey House (number
21 on map). Young of both sexes have the
yellowish-white coloration of the Zoo’s recent
infant, which clings so tightly to its mother
that its sex has not yet been determined. And,
again regardless of sex, the fur of the young
is reported to become black at the age of about
six months. Later, evidently on reaching sexual
maturity at the age of five or six years, two-
fifths of the females regain their yellowish-
white color. Males do not become sexually
mature until later, perhaps at the age of seven
or eight years; and it appears that it is not until
then that they develop the patches of white
cheek fur for which the species is named.
Females that do not have the yellowish-white
coloration resemble the males, as does a
younger female currently sharing the cage of
the Zoo’s mother and young.
Jaguar Cubs
On July 26th, a young female jaguar at the
Lion House (number 23 on map) gave birth
to her first litter, which consisted of two cubs.
She had arrived at the National Zoo in Septem-
ber, 1971, at the age of about nine months. Her
mate was even younger than she was, having
arrived in February, 1972, at the age of only
five or six months. Thus at their successful
mating this past April he was considerably
younger than the three years mentioned by
some authors as the age at which sexual matu-
rity is attained in this species.
The cubs, blind at birth, appeared much
woolier than their parents, and their coats
were more densely spotted than an adult
jaguar’s. At first they spent their time alter-
nately nursing and sleeping, and the Lion House
was kept closed to the public to prevent dis-
turbance to them or to their mother. The cubs
would not eat their first solid food until about
50 days old; by then they should weigh around
ten pounds and be frequently active and play-
ful. Full weaning will come at the age of
about four months, by which time the cubs
can be expected to weigh over 30 pounds.
Successful captive breedings of jaguars (Pan-
thera onca) are not as common as successful
breedings of their relatives the lion (Panthera
leo) and the tiger (Panthera tigris). \n fact, less
is known of the general biology and natural
history of the jaguar than of those of either
of these other great cats — the only two mem-
bers of the cat family that attain larger sizes
than it. While the jaguar is found in habitats
as varied as the pampas of Argentina and thorn
thickets along rivers in Mexico or — occasion-
ally — southern Texas, Arizona, and New
Mexico, it is most characteristically an inhab-
itant of dense tropical forests where opportu-
nities for observation are few. It seems to
prefer to live close to water; and some author-
ities have asserted that it preys mainly on
aquatic or semi-aquatic animals, such as fish,
alligators, and the large rodents known as
capybaras. Other authors mention peccaries
as a favorite food; and as the jaguar is an adept
climber, it is believed by some to take to the
trees in pursuit of sloths and monkeys.
Lesser Panda Cubs
On June 29th, the Zoo’s adult pair of lesser
pandas (Ai/urus fulgens) gave birth to their
second litter of two. As in the previous birth,
the mother built a nest of leaves, twigs, and
straw in the bottom of the hollow tree in the
lesser pandas’ enclosure (number 16 on map).
A nest box and the log cabin in the enclosure
provided additional possible shelters for the
cubs, blind and helpless at birth. Almost ex-
actly a year previously this female had given
birth toa pair of cubs, now fully grown and
on exhibit in a separate enclosure (number
18a on map). The fact that other captive
births of lesser pandas — in Darjeeling, India,
in London, and in San Diego — have also
occurred in June suggests that there is a
remarkably well defined birth season in this
little-known species.
The newborn cubs — one of which might
occasionally be glimpsed being carried from
one nest place to another in its mother’s
mouth — differed considerably in appearance
from the strikingly marked adults. Their fur
was a pale tannish white all over; and the tail,
which is nearly as long as the rest of the body
in the adult, made up only about a quarter
of each cub’s total length. The areas beneath
the eyes where the “‘tear-marks”’ of russet fur
are located in the adult were unfurred, and the
bare pink skin was visible.
The cubs’ appearance began to change rapidly,
however. When they were about two weeks
old and had both eyes open, the undersides
and legs — black in the adult — had begun to
darken noticeably. Gradually these areas
would change color, the fur of the back would
become reddish, and rings would appear on the
tail. After about two-and-a-half months,
though a good deal smaller and less steady in
their movements, they could be expected to
resemble their parents fully in appearance.
About a month later they will probably begin
to emerge from their nesting places — first
only in their mother’s company, then later on
their own — and by winter they: should be
regularly visible.
The lesser panda is native to Yunnan and
Szechuan provinces in China, northern Burma,
Sikkim, and Nepal. Like the giant panda
(Ailuropoda melanoleuca), which is its closest
living relative and is placed along with it ina
separate family, it is one of the least carni-
vorous of the members of the order of
mammals known as the Carnivora or carni-
vores. The Pandas are evidently an Asian off-
shoot of the stock that led to the now exclu-
sively New World procyonids — the family
that includes the raccoon, coatimundi, and
kinkajou. The procyonids are themselves all
omnivorous, but the pandas have evolved still
further from a predatory existence and in the
direction of an exclusively vegetarian diet.
For instance, the lesser panda’s staples in the
wild are reported to be bamboo, fruit, nuts,
and roots, though it may rob an occasional
egg or kill a small bird or mammal.
Wildebeest Calves
Three female wildebeest or white-bearded gnus
(Connochaetes taurinus albojubatus) gave birth
to single calves on June 21st, June 24th, and
July 26th. The young were light brown in
color, in contrast to the gray coloration of
their mothers, but‘they had black foreheads
like the adults. The black mane that grows
along the neck of the adult was also present,
but the long white ‘‘beard”’ for which this
subspecies is named had scarcely begun to
develop.
The wildebeest calves were able to stand and
follow their mothers within minutes of birth
and could be seen walking or running with
them around the enclosure (number 9e on
map). \n a great many antelope by contrast
— as in anumber of other hoofed animals,
such as deer ~— the young remain in one hiding
place for the first week or two of life; the
mother visits the hiding place to nurse her off-
spring but remains away from it at other times.
This behavior has the advantage of protecting
the infant from predators and keeping the
mother from being encumbered with a defense-
less infant. In the wildebeest, however, there
seem to be even greater advantages for a
relative precocity on the part of the calf, and
the calf’s ability to follow its mother can be
seen as an adaptation to a life on the open
grasslands of East Africa.
In the wild the great majority of wildebeest
births take place in January and February —
the height of the rainy season in East Africa.
Then the wildebeest are sexually segregated,
the males forming loosely organized bull herds
and the females living in more stable calving
One of the Zoo’s three recent wildebeest calves with
its mother (number 9e on map).
herds. Since the wildebeest inhabit open plains
where they are plainly visible at a distance, the
calving herds are highly vulnerable to predation
the major predator being the spotted hyena
(Crocuta crocuta). The ability to move with
the herd in order to escape a predator is thus
highly advantageous for the survival of the
young. The fact that there is a relatively short
birth season also affords protection against
predators, since there is only a short period’
when there are calves at the most vulnerable
age.
d
Birds
Bald Eagle Hatched
On May 25th or 26th, a single bald eagle egg
was hatched in a large stick nest located high
in the rear right-hand corner of the eagles’
spacious flight cage (number 7a on map). The
National Zoo was only the third zoo ever to
hatch our national bird in captivity. For the
first couple of weeks of the eaglet’s life the
hatching was not announced to the press and
public for fear of any disturbance to the
young bird and its parents. But the nestling
thrived, and by August it was as large as an
adult and fully fledged in its first black juvenal
plumage.
The white feathers on the head and neck
from which this species derives its common
name will not appear until much later —
when the bird is four or five years old. At
this writing the eaglet has not yet.flown from
the nest, but it is believed that it will do so
10
The Zoo’s bald eagle hatchling with one of its
parents; the picture was taken when the eaglet was
still in its downy plumage, at the age of about one
month.
very soon. In the wild bald eagle parents have
been observed coaxing their offspring to fly
by bringing food and placing it within sight
of the nest but at some distance away, and the
Zoo’s pair may behave similarly, perhaps
encouraging the young bird to fly to one of
the perching places in the other corners of
the cage.
During the nestling period, on the other hand,
bald eagle parents take very diligent care of
their offspring, which are almost invariably
two in number and only very rarely one or
three. Usually the male brings food to the nest,
and the female in turn feeds the hatclhiling,
tearing off pieces of food for it with her bill.
The Zoo’s female, somewhat larger than the
male, could regularly be seen feeding her
downy gray young the rats and fish that are
placed in the bald eagles’ cage. The newly
hatched eaglet was almost completely helpless, New Parrot Cages
unable to raise its head up and only barely able
to see through partly closed eyes, but as it
grew it gradually learned to tear up its own
Three new cages have been constructed behind
the Bird House (number 6s-u on map), mainly
te for housing relatively large members of the
> parrot family, particularly macaws.
The bald eagle or American eagle (Ha/iaetus In the easternmost cage are a breeding pair of
leucocephalus) isarare and endangered species. red-and-green macaws (Ara ch/oroptera);
Though it is so common in our national iconog- in the middle cage are a pair of scarlet macaws
raphy that few Americans go a day without (Ara macao); and in the third cage are a male
seeing its image — present on much of our cur- great green macaw (Ara ambigua), a female
rency as well as on the Presidential seal — in yellow-and-blue macaw, and a male sulfur-
1962 it was calculated that there were only crested cockatoo (Kakatoe galerita).
3807 bald eagles and only 515 active nests in
the continental United States. Moreover, with
a nesting success rate at that time of only 44
percent, their numbers have probably con-
tinued to decline. Once common throughout
most of North America, reaching north to
western Canada and Alaska and extending south
to Baja California, the bald eagle is now found
in substantial numbers only in the Alaskan
portion of its range, where the human popu-
lation is small and has as yet had little adverse
effect on the environment. In Maryland and
Virginia, for instance, a 1971 survey found
only 61 active nesting pairs and only 25 young
The macaws of the genus Ara are typical of
the tropical forests of South and Central
America. They feed on fruits and on nuts,
which they are able to open by means of their
large, powerful bills. In all members of the
parrot family the bill has evolved a distinctive
form that makes it useful for cracking seeds
and nutshells. The underside of the upper man-
dible usually possesses hard filing ridges, and
the lower mandible can slide backwards and
forwards to break through a hard shell. But in
the macaws this specialized bill has reached its
most spectacular development as a nutcracker.
hatched, for a success rate of only about 36 Another use of the bill found in virtually every
percent — obviously too low if the population _ parrot species can readily be seen in the Zoo’s
in this area is to continue to sustain itself. macaws. This is its function as a ‘‘third foot”’
in climbing — the macaw’s preferred method
of locomotion in feeding trees in its native
habitat. In addition, every member of the par-
rot family is also well adapted for holding on
to branches by means of its feet; the feet are
excellent grasping organs, with two toes
directed forward and two directed backward.
The central reason for the decline of the bald
eagle in recent years has been the use of DDT
in agriculture. Deposits of this pesticide build
up in fish — the bald eagle’s main food through
most of its range — and their effect on the eagle
is to reduce drastically its fertility and the sur-
vival rate of its young. Another factor has been
the spread of human settlement and the con- — Most parrots nest in cavities of some sort, and in
sequent destruction of wilderness areas. In the captivity a nest box will in many cases bu
ane a aie oe ties pd Sin accepted as a substitute. (Though many
we : ei me ‘a Aly cect liu 1a eee breeders have had success with a wide variety
usually SO 8 2 of parrot species, it must be admitted that, in
erably a pine. The destruction of forests has comparison to the great numbers of members
doubtless eliminated a great number of suitable of this family in captivity, the percentage of
pees Sites. captive breedings is still quite low.) As in
Thus conservation efforts have often been other cavity-nesting birds, the young of parrots
aimed at the preservation of known nesting are able, because of the protected situation
sites, which may be used annually for many in which they are hatched, to undergo a
years. In Florida, for instance, which of all relatively long period of development before
states after Alaska has the largest population leaving the nest. Thus the macaw’s offspring,
of bald eagles, the Audubon Society has estab- hatched blind and completely featherless, are
lished a ‘‘cooperative sanctuary plan” whereby _ still featherless at the age of a week and are
the owners of land on which traditional bald meanwhile being fed by food regurgitated by
eagle nesting sites are located agree to treat the parent. The wing quills do not begin to
their property as bald eagle preserves. Some erupt until the nestling is four weeks old, and
2,300,000 acres have been set aside as sanctu- _jt is not fully feathered until it is ten weeks
aries in this fashion. In addition, there is a old. Even so it remains in the nest another
program in the same state to plant pitch-pines —_ three weeks. This nestling period is quite pro-
in the hope of creating suitable nesting sites for longed compared with that of many song-
future bald eagles. birds, the young of which may be ready to fly
11
A 3 OMAP
. Connecticut Avenue pedestrian entrance
. Connecticut Avenue vehicular entrance
. Deer and antelope areas (a-j)
. Great Flight Cage
cm
SCOMNODOAWN =
Bird House
. Pheasant and crane line (a-u)
. Raptor cages (a-d)
. Delicate-hoofed stock building (a-c)
Hardy-hoofed stock complex (a-i)
Panda House (a-c)
12
. Elephant House
. Water birds (a-e)
. Hawks and owls (a-c)
. Black Rhinoceros Yard
. Small Mammal Building
. Lesser Pandas
. Prairie dogs
. Bears and monkeys (a-m)
. Reptile House
. Tortoise yard
. Monkey House
. Hardy Animals (a-o)
. Lion House
. Komodo Dragon
. Bears (a-})
. Water animals (a-e)
. Sea Lion pool
. Wolves, foxes, and wild dogs (a-|)
. Monkey cages (a-b)
. Waterfowl ponds (a-d)
. Police Station—Restrooms—First Aid
. Restaurant
. Picnic Area
. Window Shop
. Souvenir Kiosk
. Rock Creek Parkway entrance
. Friends of the National Zoo Offices
. FONZ Education, Editorial, and Tour
Guide Offices
Telephone
Restrooms
Trackless Train Stops
Parking
ees
Walking Tour Route
(From the Trackless Train
Stations)
ve
R
OCck Cree,
13
c
.
9 gue
2 = TE ty hee
- e
Fuge
aoe
“oe oe
Bie
aa
4 <%
4
—
= er
ri
> tad
= a
i. 7 .
ir
1
=e °
<es -
. :
zs “ae
i i 2 "
fe 3 “
7 = r ae
" om fee
Pest
sd =
a od “
15,
i pr 2 sje
7 n
7 an
at une :
i 7
re Pa .
.
Lf so ‘
4
2 lp
‘
- Se 4a a ag?
° ie .
a
-
Bt ty
Se.
: 5
\t
|
1
as 4
f
— y
‘
bs
— ‘
*
PI ‘ wy oe i‘,
. / Se ey ing
2 . - =>
es ee. ——
ie 7 7 — : .
“x ‘
no 7 é ~ ~~ ee,
¥
4
+ 5 4 , io’ :
/ oe
; ;
- ®
: =
' Z
+ *)
*
© : i
i
ie -
= \
:
®
*
,
Ma
‘ait
. 20) o
- i]
ee ,
me a “
- ‘ Z
la re : &
. . *
ee «i ' bp
iy - _
are : “ ‘
x 7 — 7
‘ ¥ i ay Me
P <i a= a =
i : 7
- y eal ee
a “
7 eo - be a
"5 ca :
i ' 7 .
/ a if ’
vote =
7 - a : f
. a
es ws _e ea ‘ -
* t « -
: 1
5
~ > bs +
- = ‘ - °
ahr iy
} ‘
; P
‘
he :
‘ ia > Pa
- 7
ne f b- ont 5
r =
+ le | a 4 .
“ e > bat :
- 4 . i‘
7 -
1
x
_ ae
‘4
‘
: ‘ ‘ babe f
is 1 :
A tee
’ ‘
o .
" .
/ e
6
: .
ia “
-. :
a x zal
x5 i
ff
'
: >
(} IM4P 11. Elephant House 27. Sea Lion pool | am 8 Telephone
12. Water birds (a-e) 28. Wolves, foxes, and wild dogs (a-l)
13. Hawks and owls (a-c) - | 29. Monkey cages (a-b) b 2 Restrooms
~ 14, Black Rhinoceros Yard | 30. Waterfowl ponds (a-d)
1. Connecticut Avenue pedestrian entrance 19. Small Mammal Building | 31. Police Station—Restrooms—F irst Aid x Trackless Train Stops
2. Connecticut Avenue vehicular entrance be — _ | — oe |
8 ( -| . Frairie dogs . Picnic Area :
; siealy Sle pases — —— 18. Bears and monkeys (a-m) 34. Window Shop vite peed
5. Bird House —. 19. Reptile House 35. Souvenir Kiosk .
6. Pheasant and crane line (a-u) 20. Tortoise yard 36. Rock Creek Parkway entrance |
7. Raptor cages (a-d) | 21. Monkey House 37. Friends of the National Zoo Offices ~~» Walking Tour Route
8. Delicate-hoofed stock building (a-c) 22. Hardy Animals (a-o) 38. FONZ Education, Editorial, and Tour (From the Trackless Train
9. Hardy-hoofed stock complex (a-i) 23. Lion House | Guide Offices Stations) |
10. Panda House (a-c) | 24. Komodo Dragon — [
25. Bears (a-j)
26. Water animals (a-e) , |
Db ao
a) 0% m
Ae 13
from the nest at the age of two weeks — not
to mention the young of precocial species
such as those of members of the pheasant
family, which follow their parents from the
nest on the day of hatching.
Other birds being kept at this writing in these
new cages include the handsome pied crow
(Corvus alba), a very common species in
tropical and southern temperate Africa, in the
i
A blue-and-yellow macaw (left) and a great green
macaw (number 6u on map).
middle cage, and white-winged trumpeters
(Psophia leucoptera) in the easternmost cage.
White-winged trumpeters belong to an interest-
ing family, the trumpeters or Psophidae, tropi-
cal American relatives of the cranes and rails.
They are mainly terrestrial, omnivorous birds;
they are named for their distinctive call —
which, however, is said to be a deep, melodic
rumble with very little resemblance to a
trumpet blast.
14
Pygmy Monitors
Some of the most interesting of recent acquisi-
tions at the Reptile House (number 19 on map)
are three pygmy monitors or mulga monitors
(Varanus gilleni). This species belongs to the
monitor family, which includes the largest
living lizard known, the Komodo dragon
(Varanus Romodoensis), and several other
good-sized species, such as the Australian lace
15
‘
A pygmy monitor or mulga monitor (Varanus gilleni),
one of the smallest members of the family that
includes such giants as the Komodo dragon.
monitor (Varanus varius), also on exhibit at
the Reptile House, which grows to four or
five feet. But the mulga monitor is one of the
smallest species in the family, reaching a maxi-
mum length of about a foot.
The name mulga monitor by which these
lizards are known in their native Australia
derives from the fact that they live in trees
known as mulgas (Acacia aneura), presumably
feeding on insects and perhaps small skinks.
The possession of a prehensile tail is one ob-
vious adaptation for this way of life. Mulgas
are characteristic trees of Australia’s arid
interior to which these monitors are native.
As a group the monitors are of interest for a
number of reasons. One is that they are be-
lieved to be close to the ancestral line from
which the snakes evolved. All of the monitors
are predators, and it is believed that the ances-
tors of snakes were related small predacious
forms that lost their limbs as an adaptation to
a burrowing existence. One readily seen simi-
larity between snakes and monitors is the
latter group’s possession of a long forked
tongue which is frequently protruded to |
obtain olfactory information from the environ-
ment and transmit it to a pair of sensory pits
in the mouth known as Jacobson’s organ.
Another similarity is that, like those of most
snakes, a monitor’s teeth are curved back-
wards — presumably an adaptation to prevent
the escape of living prey while it is being
swallowed.
Blue-Tongued Skinks
Other new lizards at the Reptile House are
blue-tongued skinks (Tiligua species). Members
of this genus are found in Malaysia, Indonesia,
and Australia and include some of the largest
of the world’s approximately 600 species of
skinks, many of which are very small burrowing
forms. The largest of the Ti/iqua species,
Tiliqua gigas, sometimes known as the giant
skink, may reach two feet in length. Its only
serious rival for the claim to being the largest
skink is the prehensile-tailed skink (Corucia
zebrata), which may be seen at the Reptile
House. Nonetheless, the blue-tongued skinks
possess the readily apparent characteristics of
all skinks — for instance the extraordinarily
smooth scales, in the skin beneath which there
are buried bony ossicles.
Blue-tongued skinks.
16
17
Rattlesnakes inhabit the New World exclusively,
and they have always played a prominent role
in the folklore of the Americas. This has been
particularly the case in the southwestern United
States and northern Mexico, where their
greatest numbers and greatest variety of species
occur; from the Aztecs and the Hopi, in whose
religious beliefs these reptiles figured heavily,
to the pioneers of the last century, inhabitants
of this region have long been fascinated by
them. Their possession of warning rattles as
well as a potent venom has made them appear
both malign and at the same time unaccount-
ably benevolent. Many of their habits — the
tendency of some species to hibernate in
groups; the impressive combat rituals of the
males; the unusual method of locomotion of
one species, the sidewinder — have repeatedly
excited human wonder and curiousity. The
impulse to attempt to explain the unfamiliar
is as old, or almost as old, as the impulse to
fear and worship; and by myth and conjecture
men have long sought to account for the unique
characteristics of rattlesnakes. Only compara-
tively recently have scientists begun to study
them seriously and objectively; and what they
have found has often proved to be more
interesting — and more amazing — than any
fiction.
There are approximately 26 species of rattle-
snakes, belonging to two related genera,
Crotalus and Sistrurus. The former group con-
tains the best-known American species —
including the sidewinder (Crotalus cerastes),
the eastern and western diamondback rattlers
Timber rattlesnake, illustrating the tongue-flicking
used to pick up olfactory information from the
environment.
(Crotalus adamanteus and Crotalus atrox) and
the timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus) that
inhabits the eastern United States, including
the Washington, D.C. area. The five S/strurus
species — known as pygmy rattlers or massa-
saugas — are much smaller snakes.
Both genera of rattlesnake are included by
herpetologists in a larger group known as the
pit-vipers or crotaline snakes. Taxonomically,
this group is usually designated as the sub-
family Crotalinae of the family Viperidae or
vipers. The pit-vipers are distinguished from
the other vipers, the mole vipers and the “true”
vipers, all of which are Old World snakes, and
from all other snakes, by the possession of
facial pits located between the eye and the
nostril on each side of the head. The pit-vipers
are found in both the New World and the Old
World and, like all of the Viperidae, are
venomous. The Old World pit-vipers are found
in Indo-Australian Archipelago and in Asia,
with one species ranging into European Russia.
The New World species include not only the
rattlesnakes but two other well-known North
American venomous snakes, the cottonmouth
(Agkistrodon piscivorous) and the copperhead
(Agkistrodon contortrix).
The existence of the crotaline facial pits has
been recognized since at least the Eighteenth
Century; but, although there was a great deal
of speculation, their function remained a
mystery until our own time. Often they were
said to be the locus of some uncanny ‘‘sixth
sense” which humans lacked; and careful
experimentation has shown that that is in
effect what they are.
18
Close-up of the head of an eastern diamondback
(Crotalus adamanteus), clearly showing the heat-
sensitive facial pit.
The pits are now known to be sensory organs
highly sensitive to radiant heat (or, more tech-
nically, infra-red radiation). We are of course
able to detect the presence of heat radiating
from a nearby object by means of the warming
effect it-has on our skin surfaces, but the pit-
viper is%erisitive to much subtler temperature
differences in its surroundings and can pin-
point a source of radiant heat with far greater
accuracy. In fact the pits are used to detect
the presence in the snake’s vicinity of its
usually warm-blooded prey and to guide the
direction of its strike.
The opening of each pit is clearly visible and
faces forward. The pit widens out inside and
is divided into two chambers by a thin mem-
brane — only one thousandth of an inch thick
— that is richly supplied with sensitive nerve
endings. A duct connects the inner chamber
with the outside. Experiments have shown
that there is a response in the nerves of the
membrane when an object as little as one-and-
four-fifths degrees Fahrenheit hotter or colder
than the surrounding atmosphere is intro-
duced to the pit-viper’s vicinity as far away
as almost a foot from its head. This means
19
that the snake is able to detect the radiant
heat given off by a single mouse about eleven
inches away. Moreover, by the angles at which
the heat waves strike the membranes, the
snake is able to ascertain the location of the
source without the use of any other sense.
The possession of a rattle is of course the
obvious characteristic that distinguishes the
Crotalus and Sistrurus snakes from the rest of
the pit-vipers. It consists of a series of loosely
interlocking segments composed of a kind of
keratin — the group of allied protein sub-
stances that compose not only reptilian scales
but also the feathers and leg-scutes of birds
and the hair, claws, and horn of mammals. A
newly hatched rattler has no rattle but only
a tiny growth of rattle-like substance known
as a “‘pre-button”’ at the end of its tail. When
it first sheds its skin, at the age of a week to
ten days, it loses the ‘‘pre-button,’’ which is
replaced in its second skin by the ‘‘button.”
The button forms the first segment of the
rattle and is retained with each subsequent
shedding of the skin until it is finally broken
or worn off. At the second shedding a new
segment is bared, which is larger than the button
and pushes it out to the end of the rattle.
This new segment in turn is retained after
the next shedding, and thus at each shedding
of the skin a new segment is added to the
rattle.
As is well known, the rattle serves as a means
of warning away any other animal that is
about to attack or inadvertently injure the
snake. Many snakes that lack rattles vibrate
their tails as a warning measure; in dead
leaves or other debris, this can make a sound
similar to that the rattlesnake makes with its
rattle. Some authorities have speculated that
the earliest rattlesnakes evolved in the open
prairie of what is now the western and
southwestern United States where such ground
debris would have been largely lacking. And
yet there were large herds of hoofed mammals,
including relatives of the present-day bison
and pronghorn, which very frequently would
threaten to trample the reptiles under foot.
According to this theory, the possession of
venom — which evolved with the immobili-
zation of prey as its primary purpose and
only secondarily proved of value in defense —
would not alone have been sufficient to
preserve the snake from harm, since even if
the venom killed one of the ungulates, the
snake might still be trampled on by it or other
members of the herd. In that case a warning
device would be of considerable survival value.
If a rattlesnake is threatened when it is near a
safe refuge, it may rattle while crawling away
towards safety. If the danger continues, the
snake will assume a characteristic defensive
posture. In this position, the front part of the
body is raised up off the ground and thrown
into a roughly S-shaped curve with the tail
flattened against the ground and the rattle
raised and shaking. The tail provides anchor-
age so that the head and neck will be free to
_ Strike if necessary. Meanwhile the rattlesnake
inhales and exhales with aloud hiss, and its
tongue is extended from the mouth to its full
length and pointed alternately upwards and
downwards with its forked tips widely spread.
Here one function of the extension of the
tongue may be to enhance the snake’s formi-
dable appearance; indeed human folk beliefs
provide some indication that it can do so, at
least in the case of man. Often it has been sup-
posed that a venomous snake’s tongue is itself
venomous; and legends of fire-breathing on the
part of mythical reptiles may have derived in
part from tongue protrusion on the part of a
snake in defensive display. But the tongue may
well be playing another role as well; for like
the tongues of many other snakes and lizards,
the rattlesnake’s tongue has an important func-
tion in the snake’s sensory exploration of its
environment.
This can readily be seen in the frequent tongue-
flicking behavior of non-aroused rattlesnakes
or other snakes and lizards. When the tongue
is extended, particles in the air are caught
in the saliva on it. When it is retracted, these
are conveyed to a pair of pits inside the mouth
known as Jacobson’s organ; one of the two
forks of the tongue is tucked into each pit. Pre-
sent in vestigial form in most terrestrial verte-
brates but well-developed in lizards and snakes,
this is an olfactory organ that like the more
ordinary channels of smell responds to the
chemical character of the particles conveyed
to it. The rattlesnake uses Jacobson’s organ in
situations similar to those in which mammals
use sniffing. When the snake becomes aware
of the approach of a potential predator or a
likely victim — usually by means of the more
ordinary channels of smell — its first reaction
is to attempt to ascertain the source of the
scent by flicking its tongue.
In hunting the rattler usually lies in wait beside
a trail where some small mammal is likely to
pass. When the approach of suitable prey has
been detected by the nasal channels of scent,
Jacobson’s organ next comes into play; finally
_ at close range sight and the heat-sensitivity of
the facial pits direct the attack. The rattle-
snake’s sight is fairly good at close quarters;
although its eyes are believed to provide only
a general impression of light intensities in
their surroundings, they have been found to
be particularly sensitive to movement within
a foot or two. Moreover, rattlesnakes are most
active and do by far the greater part of their
hunting at night, and their eyes have been
shown to be more sensitive when only a little
light is available than they are in broad day-
light.
Directly after the rattler has attacked its prey,
Jacobson’s organs play what is perhaps their
most crucial role. The hollow fangs inject
venom by means of a muscular contraction
around the poison gland at the moment the
snake strikes. Then, like other-venomous
snakes, the rattler quickly draws its head
back to avoid any possible retaliation on the
part of the stricken prey. It may take only a
few seconds or at most several minutes for the
venom to take effect, but in that time a
stricken mammal will usually run on. The
snake must rely on Jacobson’s organ to track
it to the spot where it has fallen. Upon finding
its prey, the rattler briefly investigates the
body with its tongue, then seizes it by the
nose and begins to swallow it. Since the venom
20
Close-up of a rattle, showing the interlocking segments,
contains digestive enzymes, the process of
digestion has already begun.
The venom-injecting apparatus of the Viperidae
is the most efficient that has ever evolved in
reptiles. One reason is that the paired fangs
are hollow, thus making them, in effect,
“hypodermic needles.” In venomous snakes
of other families this is not the case; in the
cobras, for instance, the fangs are equipped
only with grooves. Moreover, the viper’s com-
paratively larger fang and the bone to which
it is attached are movable. When the jaws are
closed a complicated system of bone articu-
lations causes the fangs to fold back inside the
mouth; when the mouth is opened the same
mechanism is used to erect the fangs.
Although the majority of rattlesnake species
inhabit arid and semi-arid regions in Mexico
and the southwestern United States, others
are found in every type of habitat from
prairie to tropical forest and at altitudes from
sea level to 10,000 feet. The species on exhibit
at the National Zoo’s Reptile House (number
19 on map) illustrate some of the variety of
habitats occupied by members of the genus
Crotalus within the United States. There are
two races or subspecies of Crotalus horridus,
for instance, that show marked differences
in habitat preference. The timber rattlesnake
(Crotalus horridus horridus), on exhibit in
cage C-1, appears throughout the Northeast
21
and Midwest in forested areas, particularly on
rocky hillsides. The canebrake rattlesnake
(Crotalus horridus atricaudatus), on exhibit
in cage E-14, which is found on the coastal
plain south of southern Virginia, along the
Gulf Coast, and up the Mississippi Valley as
far as southern Indiana and Illinois, is charac-
teristic of swamp and bottom lands, including
the canefields from which it derives its
common name. The other rattlesnake in the
building, the northern Pacific rattlesnake
(Crotalus viridis oreganus), \ocated in cage
C-3, is found from southern California through
Washington. In California, it is typical of sage-
brush and chaparral along the foothills of the
Sierras, while in more northerly regions it is
found in a great variety of habitats, from
rocky cliffs to mountain meadows. Inter-
estingly, another race of this same species,
Crotalus viridis viridis, is the typical rattler of
the Western prairies.
As with other reptiles, the particular micro-
habitat each rattlesnake chooses within its
habitat depends not only on the availability’
of food but also on the all-important factor
of temperature. Unlike birds and mammals,
reptiles do not produce enough heat from
their metabolic activity alone to raise their
body temperatures to the point where they
are Capable of performing the activities they
need to perform in order to survive and repro-
duce. Thus they must absorb heat from the
environment. Each reptile seeks to absorb
enough heat — whether direct solar heat or
heat that has been absorbed from the sun by
the substrate — to maintain its body tempera-
ture within a relatively small compass within
which the animal’s bodily functions are at or
near their optimum. For rattlesnakes, this
optimum temperature has been estimated at
between 80 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit.
Thus a timber rattlesnake may bask in the sun
to achieve a comfortable temperature and then
return to the shade before becoming over-
heated. It may even be found lying directly
on the dividing line between a patch of direct
sunlight and a patch of shade, thus achieving
a balance between the two environmental
temperatures. Desert rattlesnakes tend to be
more strictly nocturnal than species inhabiting
more humid areas and areas with more cover;
daytime temperatures in the desert may be too
severe for the reptile to expose himself to
them directly. Sidewinders may rest in the day
at the mouth of a burrow, partly exposed to
the sunlight. This species has also been found
in the daytime buried in the sand, its back
heated by the sun and its lower side cooled
by the considerably lower temperature an
inch or two beneath the surface. Even species
inhabiting cooler, more northerly climates
tend to be mainly nocturnal in midsummer.
But in every species, temperature is not the
only factor involved in the preference for
nocturnal activity; and the quest for optimum
temperature may be sacrificed for other
advantages. Not only is the rattler’s eyesight
better at night but the pit is more useful when
the contrast between the temperature of warm-
blooded prey and that of the surroundings Is
greater. In addition, the small mammals that
constitute the bulk of the rattlesnake’s diet
are mainly nocturnal.
gsanaananesss
Temperature plays its role in the annual life
cycle of the rattlesnake as well. Like other
reptiles in the same areas, species inhabiting
the temperate zone must spend all or part of
the winter in hibernation in order to escape
death by freezing. The timber rattlesnake,
the northern Pacific rattlesnake, and other
species are famous for their habit of wintering
together in large groups, numbering up to a
hundred in some cases. The dens they use are
traditional, used year after year. How the
rattlesnakes are able to locate the dens in the
fall is not known, but surely its numbers indi-
cate that such a denning group represents a
rattlesnake population that has been dispersed
over a considerable area. Possibly there is some
sort of homing instinct — a drive postulated
in the case of many vertebrates but little
understood in any. Learning, too, is a possible
explanation. In either case, the sense of smell
may be crucial. All snakes possess anal scent
glands; and the secretions of these glands left
by snakes in which either the homing urge is
stronger or the learning more precise may help
direct others to the den. In any event it has
been shown in the case of at least one sub-
species — the Great Basin rattlesnake (Crota/us
viridis lutosus) — that individual snakes do
return to the same den year after year.
Timber rattlers in New Jersey, it has been
_ reported, are accustomed to enter the dens in
mid-September and emerge in mid-April; but
in other cases the dates have been found to
vary rather more widely from year to year. In
one California county, northern Pacific rattle-
snakes were found to emerge from the dens
en masse at any time from mid-March to almost
mid-April. A rise in temperature above 70 de-
grees Fahrenheit was apparently the stimulus
for a general emergence. However, before
22
finally retiring to the dens in fall and before
definitively leaving in spring, the rattlesnakes
may gather close to the entrance of the den
at the warmest part of warm days.
Rattlesnakes in the more southerly regions of
the United States appear to give birth annually
and to mate soon after emerging from the dens
in spring. In colder regions, females seem most
commonly to give birth every other year and,
though some may mate in spring, a great many
mate in late summer or fall. Fall matings seem
to be the norm in the timber rattlesnake and
occur in perhaps a majority of cases in the
northern Pacific rattlesnake. Nonetheless, in
almost all North American species and sub-
Species it appears that the young are born in
fall — early enough to ensure that they will
have time to accumulate the stored food
energy they will need.to last them through
their first winter of hibernation.
This variation in the period between mating
and giving birth is made possible by the female
rattlesnake’s ability to store live sperm for
quite long periods before ovulation takes place.
In the case of a spring mating, ovulation — the
passage of the eggs from the ovaries where
they are formed to the uteri where they are to
be fertilized — evidently takes place in spring
as well. In fall mating, the sperm is stored in
a special pouch; and, though the eggs develop
to a large size in the ovaries, comparable to the
size they will have achieved at ovulation, ovula-
tion and fertilization do not occur until after
the female emerges from hibernation in the
spring.
Rattlesnakes bear live young. Technically
speaking, they are ovoviviparous; in other
words, the eggs — which have a soft covering
rather than the hard or leathery shell typical
of reptilian eggs — are retained in the mother’s
body until the young are ready to hatch. The
young rattler may break out of the egg at or
just before the time when it actually emerges
from the mother’s body, or it may not emerge
until some minutes after parturition has taken
place. The young are coiled inside the egg
membrane and break it by thrusting upward
several times with the snout. As in other rep-
tiles, there is a temporary ‘‘egg-tooth”’ on the
front of the upper jaw, but due to the softness
of the membrane it is much reduced in com-
parison to those of reptiles with hard-shelled
eggs. Within a day after hatching, the umbilical
cord that connected the young snake with the
yolk sac when it was in the egg dries up and
breaks off.
One of the most striking and well-known
aspects of rattlesnake natural history — the
male combat ‘‘dance”’ — evidently plays a role
23
in the reproductive cycle of these reptiles, but
its exact function is still a matter of speculation
and debate. In rural or wilderness areas of this
continent, human observers have often been
startled to find two rattlers with the lower
halves of their bodies entwined while their
heads, raised high above the ground, lunged
repeatedly at each other. At first, folklore
assumed that the two snakes must be male and
female and that this behavior must be courtship.
Later it was found that the two were invariably
males and that in courtship neither snake
would raise its head above the ground.
The function of these combats has not been
easy to determine. Originally it was supposed
that there must be a female present over which
the two males were fighting, but it has been
repeatedly asserted that this is far from always
the case. In captivity it was found that the
introduction of a female would sometimes
stimulate two male rattlesnakes to engage in
the combat ritual but that on other occasions
they would perform the “dance” with no
female present. In the wild it is more difficult
to prove that a female is not or has not been
present where two males are fighting, since a
definite decision requires a very thorough
search of the surrounding terrain, which is
often covered with thick underbrush in which
a single snake would be very difficult to find.
However, it was found by the examination of
the testes of two males collected during
combat that both were in breeding condition,
producing viable sperm; and perhaps the com-
bat ritual is engaged in by any two males in
breeding condition who encounter one another.
In the wild records tend to indicate that the
season in which combats occur coincides
roughly with the mating season, whether that
be in the spring or in the fall.
Though perhaps the most spectacular, the
combat dance is only one of a number of
unexplained aspects of rattlesnake natural
history. The motivation involved in denning
and the subtle interrelationships between
climate and the annual reproductive cycle are
other areas deserving further study — study
that may well serve to illuminate parallel
mysteries as to the causes of animal activity
throughout the vertebrates. For these and
other investigations to be carried out, how-
ever, it will be necessary for the constantly
spreading human population of North America
not to react to these reptiles with blind fear
and a desire to exterminate but to allow them
their place on this continent as well. Surely
they deserve it — as an invaluable control on
rodent numbers, as interesting objects of study
in their own right, and as major contributors
to our cultural heritage.