September/October 1975
volume 4, number o
contents
3 Zoo Latin
8 ZooNews
10 ZooMap
ll Zoo Art
18 BookNews
19 FONZNews
23 Wildlife Print
Front Cover: Mother duiker and her week-
old son were doing fine when their family
portrait was taken in early November.
Back Cover: A gargoyle-like toad, elabor-
ately wrought in stone on the Reptile House
portal, typifies wild art throughout the Zoo.
Design-Production:
Monica Johansen Morgan
Photograph on front cover by Francie
Schroeder; p. 4 by Ray Faass; p. 18 courtesy
Oxford University Press; pp. 19 & 20 by Steve
Frank; all others by Sabin Robbins. Drawing
on p. 7 by Susan Hughes.
Editor’s Correction:
Photo on p. 9, vol 4no 3 by Ray Faass.
2
Friends
of
the
National
is anon-profit organization of individuals and
families who are interested in supporting Zoo
education, research, and conservation.
FONZ Board of Directors 1975-76
Arthur W. Arundel, President
Montgomery S. Bradley, First Vice President
John S. Brown, Second Vice President
Stephen T. Hosmer, Treasurer
Julie Pineau, Secretary
Lavell Merritt
Robert Nelson
Peter C. Andrews
Theodore Babbitt
Edward Boehm Ruth Nelson
Victor Delano John B. Oliver
Timothy V.A. Dillon Nancy Porter
Ronald Field Whayne Quin
M. Anthony Gould Ted Rivinus
Joan L. Jewett Rebecca Schergens
Donna K. Grosvenor Lee Talbot
Sally Tongren
Gerald Wagner
Nella Manes
Cecil McLelland
Shirley McNair
Sabin Robbins, Executive Director
As a FONZ, you and your family receive
many benefits—publications, discount privileges,
and invitations to specia! programs and activities
—to make your zoogoing more enjoyable and
educational.
THE ZOOGOER is published bi-monthly and
copyrighted © by Friends of the National Zoo,
c/o National Zoological Park, Washington, DC
20009, second class mailing permit approved at
the Washington, DC rate in the United States
$3 a year (of annual dues).
Zoo Staff
Dr. Theodore H. Reed,.Director
Mr. Edward Kohn, Deputy Director
Mr. Warren J. Iliff, Assistant Director
Mr. John Perry, Assistant Director
Office Chiefs
Mr. Jaren Horsley, Animal Management
Dr. Christen Wemmer, Conservation &
Research Center
Dr. Clinton Gray, Senior Veterinarian
Dr. Mitchell Bush, Animal! Health
Dr. Richard Montali, Pathology
Dr. John Eisenberg, Zoological Research
Mr. Emanuel Petrella, Facilities
Management
Mr. Robert Engle, Construction Management
Mr. Joseph Reed, Management Services
Mr. Robert Mulcahy, Graphics & Exhibits
Ms. Judy White, Education & Information
Mr. Joseph McGarry, Protective Services
Cpt. Samuel Middleton, NZP Police
i
CAROLI LINNAI
Narcure Curioforum Diofloridis Secundi
IN QUO
NATURE REGNA TRIA,
SECUN OUM.
CLASSES, OX DOINES, GENEZA, SPECIES,
SXSTEMATICR FPROPONUN TOR,
Editio Secunda, Autor.
STOCKHOLMI4&
Apd GOTTFR.KIESEWETTER,
17490.
=,
What’s in a name? To a zoologist it
can be “a lot.” If the average zoo
visitor even notices the Latin scien-
tific names printed under the
English names on most cage labels,
he usually ignores them. But to a
specialist, the Latin name is the
species’ only real name. A specialist
is not as interested in seeing that a
particular zoo calls it a ‘“masked
palm civet,” as in reading in Latin
that it is Paguma larvata and not
some other species.
With exotic species like Paguma lar-
vata, zoos frequently have to invent
English names on their own. Or
they may have to choose among a
half-dozen or so names proposed
by a half-dozen writers. Such
species may have perfectly good
common names, of course, in the
languages of the people who come
in contact with the animals on a
day-to-day basis. But these people
do not usually speak English.
It is obvious that people speaking
different languages will use dif-
ferent common names, but even
within one language an animal may
have different names in different
areas. The North American ruddy
duck, for instance, is said to have
fifty-nine different common names
in different local dialects. In Britain
Previous page: The title page of the second
edition of Linnaeus’s Systema Naturae pub-
lished in 1740.
The banded palm civet pictured here and
on exhibit in the Small Mammal House is
only one of the seven palm civet species in
existence.
ine same animal we call a “moose”
is an “elk,” while the species we
eal an “elk” is a “red deen’
In addition, many North American
species have been given common
names that in Britain apply to quite
different animals. It was natural
that English-speaking settlers
should give familiar names to un-
familiar species and overlook the
differences. How many American
school children, when reading in
some British poem of “robin red-
breast,” have called to mind the
pleasing picture of our native Tur-
dus migratorius. In fact, the poet
was thinking of a very different
bird, one which resembles our
“robin” only vaguely and is not
related to it. The Old World bird
has much the redder breast.
35,000 Snail Species
The fact that there are different
common names for different
species in each language is, of
course, the most obvious reason for
having Latin scientific names. The
scientific name is meant to be an
international standard name, recog-
nizable to a scientist of any na-
tion. But there are other reasons.
Most important is the fact that the
great majority of animal species
have no common names at all in
any language. About 35,000 species
of snail are known, but everyday
non-scientific English makes no fur-
ther distinction among them. They
are all just “snails.” We have a few
English names for different beetles,
such as “ladybird,” ‘‘firefly,”” “boll
weevil,” and “Japanese beetle.”
But most of the 300,000 species of
beetles remain out of sight and out
of mind to all but the specialist.
However useful a system of scien-
tific names is, there is more to
biological classification than sim-
ply assigning names. It is estimated
that about one million two hundred
thousand living species of animals
have been given scientific names.
This number is so vast that science
would be helpless if some further
order were not imposed. So individual
species of animals are grouped toge-
ther into larger groups. These larger
groups — genus, family, order, class,
and phylum—attempt to indicate
evolutionary relationships among
species. The science that concerns
itself with naming animal and plant
species and further arranging the
species into broader categories is
called taxonomy. The term comes
from the Greek language for “‘ar-
rangement.”
Aristotle might be called the first.
taxonomist. He attempted to sub-
divide the animal kingdom in a
scientific manner more than 2,200
years ago. First, he divided the
animals into two large groups
which he called ‘‘blooded”’ animals
and “‘bloodless’”” animals. He then
divided the “blooded” animals into
five classes: Fishes, Birds, Egg-
laying Quadrupeds, Live-bearing
Quadrupeds, and Whales. The Egg-
laying Quadrupeds correspond to
our amphibians and reptiles. The
Live-bearing Quadrupeds were
mammals. Not having been to
Australia, Aristotle had no way of
knowing about the platypus and the
echidna, which are egg-laying
mammals. It is interesting that
Aristotle knew enough to recognize
that whales are not fish, but he
could not tell that they should be
grouped with the mammals.
Invisible Blood
Aristotle’s ‘“‘bloodless’’ animals in-
cluded insects, crustaceans, mol-
lusks, and other lower animals.
All these animals, in fact, have per-
fectly good blood. Aristotle was
misled by the fact that their blood
is generally but not always without
hemoglobin, the red pigment
responsible for the color of higher
animals’ blood.
Despite its drawbacks, Aristotle’s
classification was unchallenged for
almost twenty centuries. During the
Renaissance, a number of new
systems were proposed. The dis-
covery of new worlds in Africa,
America, and the Orient had
brought to Europe strange new
species undreamed of by Aristotle.
Finally, in the Eighteenth Century,
one man’s system won universal ac-
ceptance. This man was Carlus Lin-
naeus, a professor at the University
of Uppsala in Sweden.
Linnaeus was primarily a botanist,
but he also named thousands of
animal species. One of the reasons
for his success seems to have been
that he named and classified more
species than any of his predeces-
5
sors. More important, however, was
the method of naming he _intro-
duced, which is called the binomial
method. Each Linnaean_ species-
designation consists of two parts —
the name of the genus and the
name of the species. The name of
the species is never used without
the name of the genus. Thus, when-
ever a species is mentioned by
name, it is also immediately identi-
fied as a member of a broader
group, the genus.
For instance, the scientific name for
the domestic dog is Canis familiaris.
Other members of the genus Canis
include the wolf (Canis lupus) and
the coyote (Canis latrans). The
genus-name is always capitalized,
the species name is not.
Family Names
After genus, the next broadest
category is the family. The genus
Canis is one of fourteen genera
(plural of “Genus’’) in the family
Canidae. Man’s genus Homo and
species sapiens are the only living
genus and species in the family
Hominidae. As these examples
show, a family name is always the
name of one genus in the family
(usually the most common) with
the Latin plural ending “-idae.”
The Canidae belong to a broader
order called Carnivora. Other
families in the Carnivora include
the Felidae (cats), Ursidae (bears),
and Ailuropodidae (pandas). The
Hominidae, on the other hand,
6
“name ~ Primates,
belong to an order known as
Primates. Linnaeus himselt gave the
which means
“foremost,” to the order man
belongs to. He also gave us the
Species-name “sapiens,” or “wise.”
In the Eighteenth Century it was
common to view man as the
culminating product of nature.
The Carnivora and Primates, in
turn, are two of the eighteen living
orders comprising the class Mam-
malia — the scientific term for
mammals. The class Mammalia it-
self is one of eleven classes in the
phylum Chordata. Like man, all the
animals in the zoo’s collection are
members of the phylum Chordata.
Most members of this phylum have
backbones. Some other classes in
the Chordata are Pisces (fish), Am-
phibia (amphibians), Reptilia (rep-
tiles), and Aves (birds). The phylum
Chordata, finally, is one of some
twenty-five phyla in the kingdom
Animalia, or animal kingdom.
To Linnaeus, the purpose of
taxonomy was to reveal the Divine
Plan of Creation. To many of his
contemporaries, his activities must
have seemed at best an elaborate
expression of the scholar’s passion
for order. Only after Darwin had
enunciated his theory of evolution
could it be seen that taxonomy had
any real scientific importance.
When Linnaeus placed two animal
species in the same genus he did so
because they resembled one
another. When he placed two
genera in the same order he did so
because they resembled one
another, and so on. After Darwin,
however, categories like genus, or-
der, and family had a new meaning.
Two species in the same genus are
now seen to be not only similar but
hopefully related. This is especially
true for lineages where fossil forms
provide evidence for a common an-
cestor. Each broader category
should indicate a more distant
degree of relatedness. But where no
fossil forms exist this is often an
“act of faith” by the systematist.
Thus, the wolf Canis /upus and the
coyote Canis /atrans are thought to
descend from a common ancestor.
They also share a common an-
cestral lineage with another mem-
ber of the dog family, the red fox
Vulpes fulva. However, the com-
mon ancestor of wolf, coyote, and
red fox lived in the more distant
past than did the animal that was
ancestor to the coyote and the
wolf, but not to the red fox.
Unlike Look-Alikes
Once scientists began to base their
classifications on assumed evolu-
tionary relationships rather than
simple resemblances, there were
surprises in store for the layman.
For instance, it is now known that
the giant panda is more closely
related to the racoon than to the
bear, although it may show greater
superficial resemblance to the
latter. A less publicized case is
still more startling. There is a small
mammal called the hyrax from
Africa and the Near East that looks
at first sight like a short-eared rab-
bit or a stocky prairie dog. In fact,
the hyrax’s closest living, albeit
distant, relative is the elephant!
The fossil record has demonstrated
the lines of descent conclusively.
Not only that, but the only other
living animals closely related to the
hyrax and the elephant are the
manatees and dugongs—legless
aquatic creatures that resemble
overgrown seals.
And so, evolutionary theory
breathes life into what might other-
wise seem a dry and_ pedantic
business. Evolutionary theory
allows man not only to give names
to nature’s incredible diversity, but
to begin to account for it.
Austin Hughes
Although the little African hyrax (top left)
looks like a short-eared rabbit, it is, in fact
the closest living relative of the elephant
and manatee as dramatized in this simplified
chart.
Years Ago
(millions)
one
twelve
twenty-five
forty
fifty
Hyrax -Elephant-Manatee Evolution
Elephant
Manatee
Mastodon
Trilophodon
Dinotherium
Moeritherium
M
Pa Uintatherium
Antelope Gives Birth
A family of yellow-backed duiker—
seldom seen in the African wilds
where they live—is now on view
at the Delicate Hoofstock Building,
just above the Panda House. A 13-
pound calf was born in October.
Unusual in zoos and a species the
National Zoo hopes to breed, these
small and strikingly marked ante-
lope come from the dense forests
of west central Africa. They are
most active at night.
The yellow-backed duiker, Cepha-
lophus silvicultor, is the largest of
the ten species of duiker and
reaches a height of 34 inches and
weight of 135 pounds. Their overall
blackish-brown coat is emblazoned
with a distinctive yellow stripe that
runs from the middle of the back to
near the rump. If alarmed, duiker
will plunge with great speed into
thickets. Duiker means ‘diving
buck” in Dutch.
Named for its bold stripe, the yellow-backed
duiker of west-central Africa is a recent
Zoo arrival. The female of the pair recently
gave birth to a 13-pound male.
Roadrunners Nest
More than any other bird, the road-
runner is emblematic of the Ameri-
can Southwest. Along with the side-
winder, the coyote, and the gila
monster, it is part of an improbable
fauna that has won a prominent
place in the tales of our most
legendary region. Westerners were
spinning yarns about the ‘‘chaparral
cock’ —as they often called the
roadrunner—long before the Road-
runner cartoons.
The roadrunner is a relative of the
cuckoos, but one that has adapted
to a life on the ground in open
country. It has lost most power of
flight. Instead, it can only spread its
wings for a long, coasting leap. The
roadrunner feeds on a rather un-
birdlike diet of small desert animals
—lizards, mice, grasshoppers, and
snakes snapping them up with its
long sturdy bill. It builds its nest a
few feet off the ground in a low
bush.
Now there are a pair of roadrunners
at the National Zoo’s Bird House.
Visitors will, of course, not be able
to see what is most remarkable
about the roadrunner—the sight of
a long-tailed bird bounding across
the desert at 23 miles per hour. But
they can observe interesting and
amusing behavior by a genuine
ornithological curiosity.
The Zoo’s pair lost little time in
making themselves at home. First,
courting began: approaching the
female, his long tail wagging, the
male presents his mate with a mor-
sel of food. As he gives it to her, he
raises his crest; after she takes it, he
bows low. Later, she laid eggs.
Austin Hughes
Work nears completion on the outdoor yards surrounding the Bird House. Waterfowl will have swimming-wading pools and lawns hedged in
flowering shrubs. Meanwhile all species inside have been moved to the Conservation Center in Front Royal so that rennovations can be completed
before Easter.
7.0 @ WING i sai
KEY TO THE MAP
© Police First-Aid
@D Restrooms
@ Restaurant
Oo Soft Drinks
ée Telephone
@) Gift Shop
ak) Safari Train Stop
=) Parking Lot
© Bus Parking Lot
eS Amphitheater
—) Do Not Enter (Cars)
@ Under Construction
African Animals
¥@ Wallabies & Dik-diks
, Deer & Antelope
Delicate-Hoofed Stock
6) Giant Pandas
Great Flight Cage
Bird House
| Elephant House
RR Cheetahs
wt Sea Lions
* Black Rhinoceros Yard
(ff Small Mammals-Great Ape House
¥ Lesser Pandas
¢ Prairie Dogs
“FR Bears
WB Tortoise & Nene Geese
Mammals
ae Reptile House
) Monkey House
Siamang Gibbon
JS Jaguar
Lion-Tiger Hill
= Waterfowl Ponts
10
Adams Mil
C... n
Some animals at the Zoo never
sleep, never eat, never grow, never
move. A bronze anteater, terra-
cotta bear, mosaic elephant, and
aluminum titanotherium are among
the striking animal sculptures that
embellish the grounds’ and
buildings of the National Zoo.
Although most zoogoers come to
see the live animals, the Zoo’s wild
art collection is well worth a
special look.
The oldest animal statues are also
highest up—perched on the roof
of the newly renovated Monkey
House. On the apex of each bay of
the roof are three bear cubs; two
bobcats sit on the west towers: and
four fox cubs look out from the hip
roof and east towers. Sculpted of
terra-cotta, the animals were
designed in 1905 by Mrs. L.S.
Kemeys, a noted watercolor painter
whose husband was equally famous
as an animal sculptor. Each animal
is two to three feet high and was in-
stalled when the building —now the
oldest in the Zoo—was completed
in 1907. Why bears and bobcats for
a Monkey House? When construc-
ted, the House was designed and
used to exhibit small mammals as
well as monkeys.
Upside-Down Fame
When it was decided to build a Bird
House in the 1920’s, the late Direc-
tor, Dr. William Mann, persuaded
one of his closest friends, English
Previous page: Giant stone turtles support
elaborately carved columns at the arched
entrance to the Reptile House.
12
artist, Stephen Haweis, to design a
decorative main entrance. The ar-
tist, who had been best man in Dr.
Mann’s wedding, declined to ac-
cept any fee with the quip that his
reward would be the fame he would
receive from the design. But when
the Bird House was dedicated in
1928, the artist ruefully commented
that he could not expect much
fame since his name was misspelled
and printed upside down at the bot-
tom of the work! The mosaic door-
way, depicting a variety of exotic
birds and plants framed in colorful
geometric designs, was carefully
preserved and moved inside the
building during renovation in 1964.
It can be seen at the lower north en-
trance to the indoor flight room.
Many of the Zoo’s finest sculptures
were acquired by Director Mann
under the Public Works of Art
Project, which provided jobs for
thousands of unemployed artists
during the Depression years of the
1930’s. The National Zoo was one
of the first federal agencies to ap-
ply for the services of artists em-
ployed by the government. The Zoo
also employed more of these artists
than any other institution in the
Washington area.
The Reptile House, which opened
in 1931, was considered to be the
ultimate in zoo architecture and
won a national award citing it as
the outstanding brick building in
the eastern United States. Ap-
propriately, it was embellished with
remarkable art work. Sculptor
Charles Knight, who was. also
renowned as a wildlife author and
lecturer, created a multi-colored
mosaic of a dinosaur over the main
entrance to the Reptile House. The
sculpted portals of the house were
executed by John Joseph Earley,
also a Federal Works artist.
Snakes Open Door
The 25-foot high arched stone en-
trance features elaborately carved
capitals and columns resting on tur-
tles and surmounted by gargoyle-
like toads. Thirteen small reptile
relief panels and two giant lizards
embellish the upper portion of the
gabled porch. Brightly colored
mosaic arches embellish the en-
trance. The two wooden doors are
ornately carved and decorated with
reptile relief panels. Brass door
handles are formed by entwined
snakes. Above the inner door is a
three-foot marble relief panel of
two frogs in a pond. Set in the floor
at the entrance is a_ circular
medallion of a giant turtle made of
inlaid pieces of green, brown,
white, and black stone. The smaller
door to the right of the main en-
trance features giant lizards facing
one another with tongues touching. —
Charles Knight also designed (with
execution by Erwin Springweiler)
the various art work in the Elephant
House. Above both entrances are
six-feet wide reliefs carved in stone.
The left entrance depicts a woolly
mammoth and tusked mastadons,
prehistoric relatives of the ele-
phants on exhibit inside. The panel
above the right doorway portrays
three other ancient relatives of the
elephant: Uintatherium, Titano-
therium, and Woolly Rhinoceros.
Before the Elephant House opened
in 1937, Knight also decorated the
inside walls above the cages with
twelve aluminum panels of ancient
animals, and created five colorful
mosaic medallions on the floor
depicting some of the exhibit ani-
mals such as the Indian rhinoceros,
hippopotamus, tapir, and both
African and Asian elephants.
The German-born sculptor Erwin
Frederich Springweiler, who col-
laborated with Charles Knight in
the Elephant House, also created a
life-size replica in bronze of a giant
anteater for the front of the Small
Mammal House. The statue won
the Specter Memorial Prize at a
National Academy of Design
Exhibit in New York City before
being installed at the Zoo in 1938.
Also born in Germany and one of
America’s foremost animal sculp-
tors, Heinz Warneke was the
creator of the charming granite
statue, “Tumbling Bears” which is
sited at the upper entrance to the
bear line across from the FONZ
Windowshop. The three-foot high
work, installed in 1935, displays the
artist’s special talent for combining
life-like naturalism with a basically
abstract, geometric form.
Unfortunately, some of the
A multi-colored dinosaur grazes in a prehistoric landscape in the mosaic arch over the Reptile House entrance.
site
Clockwise starting at top left:
ile
Ze.
A giant stone lizard climbs the entrance
of the Reptile House.
Prehistoric relatives of the elephants
dominate the left doorway of the Ele-
phant House.
A terra-cotta bobcat has been on the
Monkey House roof since 1907 when the
Zoo’s oldest building housed small mam-
mals as well as primates.
A life-size giant anteater in bronze won a
prize for the sculptor and stands in front
of the Small Mammal House.
Carved from volcanic rock, this two-
foot high bear cub stands between the
Reptile and Small Mammal House.
“Tumbling Bears” in granite sits amid shrubbery at the upper entrance to the main bear line.
Depression-era zoo art can no
longer be seen. Frequent cleaning
of the cages wore off the painted
backgrounds in the Reptile House.
The cobras were once exhibited
against a Hindu temple backdrop;
the rattlesnakes had an Arizona
desert scene; and the Mangrove
snake had a swamp mural. Nearly
rubbed off are the blue-green
murals on the wall of the hippo
cage in the Elephant House. The
old Lion House, razed to make
room for the Lion-Tiger Hill exhibit,
also featured handsome floor
medallions of a lion’s head and
tiger’s head. Even the cats’ eyes
sparkled thanks to special pieces of
stainless steel cut in triangular
shapes. (The medallions have been
saved for the new Lion-Tiger ex-
hibit to open in the spring of 1976).
Newest Additions
Only four animal sculptures have
been added in the last 25 years.
Guarding the short bear line bet-
ween the Reptile and Small Mam-
mal Houses is a bear cub statue
that was unveiled in 1952. Sculpted
of volcanic rock by Cornelia Van
Auken Chapin of New York, the
two-foot high piece is reminiscent
of the simplicity and uniformity
found in ancient Egyptian statues.
Miss Chapin carved the animal
directly from the stone. lie
ternationally famous, Miss Chapin
created the Byzantine Christ which
stands on the high altar at the
Cathedral of St. John the Divine in
New York City and a giant 1,800
pound granite frog that sits in
Philadelphia’s Rittenhouse Square.
When New York’s Pennsylvania Station
was razed in 1965 a five-foot tall,
granite eagle, one of 22 which ador-
ned the old railroad station, was
saved and donated to the Smith-
sonian, who in turn placed it on the
lawn in front of the Bird House.
An example of modern sculpture
can be found in another bear cub
statue, temporarily placed in the
tortoise yard while its original site
at the Connecticut Avenue pedes-
trian entrance undergoes’ con-
struction for a new Administration-
Visitor Center. The semi-abstract
carving from Italian porphyry was
executed by New York sculptor-
teacher Jacob Lipkin and donated
in 1969. It is about two feet high
and weighs 600 pounds.
The most recent acquisition to the
Zoo’s sculpture collection is a 200-
pound bronze frog in front of the
Reptile House. Nicknamed ‘The
Happy Frog,” it was designed by
William Mozart McVey of Cleve-
land, Ohio. The modern sculptor is
best known locally for his famous
statue of Winston Churchill which
is in front of the British Embassy.
The child-climbable statue was
donated to the Zoo in October 1975
by the local Twentieth Century
Club as their bicentennial gift to the
city and the nation.
Sabin Robbins
Executive Director, FONZ
Brand new and child-climbable, ‘‘The Happy
Frog” is in front of the Reptile House.
7
BOOK\EV\
Hyaena
Hans Kruuk. Oxford University
Press, New York, 1975. 80 pp; $7.95.
“Ugly ... repulsive .. . cowardly
... horrible,”” say many Zoo
visitors when they see the
hyaenas. But the much-maligned
hyaena is, in fact, one of-nature’s
most remarkable and versatile
creatures. Take time to learn
about the hyaena, and you will
come to admire this fascinating
member of the wild kingdom.
Hans Kruuk, whose 1972 book,
“The Spotted Hyaena, Study of
Predation and Social Behavior,”
established himself as the
foremost hyaena expert, has now
written an informal, abbreviated
version of that definitive case
study. Only one complaint: $7.95
even in these inflationary days is a
high price for an 80-page paper-
back, half of which are
photographs,
Hyaenas maintain a surprisingly
strong and close-knit society
based on clans of 30 to 80 in-
dividuals. Each clan occupies a
large but specific territory which
is regularly ‘patrolled’ by small
groups who routinely scent mark
the boundaries. A clan clash over
a disputed border may involve 70
hyaenas. Females are bigger than
males and usually rule the clans.
Author Kruuk loses no time ex-
Waiting for a meal from mother, these hyaena cubs will spend most of their time near the den.
Y
Later, they will join close-knit clans of 30 to 80 hyaenas.
ploding age-old myths about East
Africa’s spotted hyaena, crocuta
crocuta. Hyaenas kill more than
they scavenge. In fact, the King of
Beasts probably better deserves
the scavenger title. Lions swipe
more food from hyaenas than
vice-versa. Casual observers don’t
realize that hyaenas kill and con-
sume their prey mostly at night.
Lions frequently chase off hyaenas
and eat on the carcass for several
days. Daytime viewers credit the
lion with the kill and accuse the
nearby hyaenas of freeloading.
Expert hunters, hyaenas will adapt
their strategy to the differing
habits of their favorite prey. Single
hyaenas confidently stalk and kill
a small gazelle, but they pack
together to tackle larger game like
zebras or wildebeest.
Other surprising traits: hyaenas
love mud and sometimes wallow
in it up to their necks. Ingenious,
they will store surplus food in
shallow water — deep enough to
conceal but only where there are
no crocodiles.
More than any other animal,
hyaenas have played an important
role in African witchcraft. Some
natives believe witches live off
hyaena milk and ride around at
night on hyaenas instead of
broomsticks. That explains why the
hyaena’s back slopes!
It’s all worth remembering the
next time you see a hyaena.
Sabin Robbins
Executive Director, FONZ
FONZ\EA\S
FONZ Annual Report
There are few who remember a day
17 years ago when we met in the
Cleveland Park Library to talk
about organizing a thing called the
Friends of the National Zoo. We
did not have two nickels to rub be-
tween our fingers. Today, we area
million dollar a year organization
with close to 10,000 members!
A million dollar organization is a
lot of responsibility for a lot of
people. Who ever would have
thought that a bunch of citizens in
a nonprofit organization like this
would ever be running all the food
services at the zoo. Although we
took over food services just last
April, we have already begun to
renovate the old restaurant across
from Lion-Tiger Hill (and which will
be called appropriately the “Mane”
restaurant) and will double the size
of the Panda Garden to serve
knockwurst, sauerkraut, and even
draft beer. Also scheduled to open
next year is an ice cream shop
serving hand-scooped, quality ice
cream; a modern snack kiosk
across from the Small Mammal
House and on Bird House Hill will
sit a continental cafe featuring
omelets, quiche, sangria and con-
tinental pastries. It will be called
the “Perch.”
More important than just serving
quality food at our National
Zoo, the Friends intend to use
imaginative graphics and educa-
tional decor to provide a learning
as well as eating experience. That
has never been tried at any zoo in
the world, and we are determined
to do it. The income will support
educational, conservation and
FONZ President Arthur W. Arundel delivers
the Annual Report on October 9, 1975.
research programs here at the zoo.
It might be considered our bicén-
tennial gift to the National Zoo.
We have burned through about
three computers trying to keep up
with our fast growing membership
— more than double last year’s.
Today, we are the third largest zoo
group in America. We have also of-
fered our membership more films,
lectures, field trips, and zoo classes
than ever before. The ZooGoer is
far more interesting and attractive
than ever. Our Paw Prints news-
letter for junior members is equally
successful.
Our visitor service activities pro-
duce the revenue for our prime
mission— education. This year we
have produced new school tours
and explored bilingual and handi-
capped tours. Our “Zoo” film,
which many enjoyed at last year’s
Annual Meeting, has now won six
major national and international
film awards including three local
Emmy awards. We have launched a
speakers program to serve local
civic groups. We had the largest
number of junior zoo aides this past
summer, and we introduced a
scholarship program to enable less
fortunate citizens, young and old,
to attend our popular zoo classes.
Last and most important of all,
FONZ volunteer guides and
docents contributed a remarkable
nine thousand hours of personal
time during the year to conduct
school group tours, answer ques-
tions from the public, and help zoo
19
scientists in animal behavior
studies. Our guide program is the
backbone of the FONZ educational
effort. They deserve a very special
thanks from all of us as do the fine
volunteers who assist in the shop,
staff the information booth, and
help in many other ways.
This very successful year—and all
years —is really made possible by
the dedicated work of many, many
people —a staff which regularly
worked extra hours, an extraordi-
narily active Board of Directors
who have given much of their time
and, of course, our members whose
continued support enables the
Friends to play an increasingly
effective role.
Arthur W. Arundel
President
Financial Report
It is a pleasure to report to you
tonight that the financial health of
the FONZ is now very good and
that prospects for the future are
increasingly bright. Indeed, during
the 12-month period since our last
annual meeting, the FONZ enjoyed
the best financial year of its history.
This was in large part due to a
significant expansion of FONZ
operations at the Zoo.
First, we constructed a new gift
shop by the Panda House which
increased shop revenues. Second,
early this year we signed a 5-year
contract with the Smithsonian
Institution through which FONZ
assumed responsibility for running
and expanding food services at the
Zoo. These developments have
resulted in a substantial increase
in FONZ net profits which in turn
has permitted us to devote increas-
ing funds to educational and other
service activities at the Zoo. It has
also placed the FONZ in a sound
financial position from which to
undertake the expansion and
improvement of operational facili-
ties planned for the next year.
Let me now briefly highlight the
major improvements in the FONZ
financial picture. For purposes of
this meeting, | will report on the
12-month period ending on August
31 of this year. All comparisons
will be with the previous 12-month
period ending August 31, 1974.
During this last year, the gross
income of the FONZ rose to
Some 400 members join the elephants and giraffes to hear Treasurer Stephen T. Hosmer report on FONZ finances.
$1,363,000 which represented an
80% increase over the previous 12
months. More importantly, the net
profits amounted to over $185,000
which is a 130% increase over the
previous year. This increase in
revenue is attributable to the con-
tinued outstanding performance of
the FONZ window shop operations
where profits rose to $164,000 and
to the fine year enjoyed by our new
food service operations which
showed a net profit of $115,000.
We are very much indebted to Mrs.
Farnsworth and her staff for their
continued excellent work in man-
aging the gift shops and to Mike
Gill and his staff for making our
food service operations so success-
ful in their first year.
The overall improvement in our
financial picture is also reflected in
the 90% increase in FONZ assets
over the period which now total
some $623,000. This record of
accomplishment is a credit to the
fine performances of our executive
director Sabin Robbins, our associ-
ate director, Dennis Baker, and our
dedicated FONZ staff.
This growth in revenue has per-
mitted FONZ to devote increasing
funds to our educational and other
service activities at the Zoo. During
the past 12 months, over $84,000
has been expended for such pro-
grams which amounted to a 60%
increase over the previous year.
Among the activities funded by this
money were our various guided
tour and junior zoo aid programs,
information booth operations,
special events, and the purchase
and distribution of our Zoo film to
schools and libraries. We are also
developing an educational kit to
accompany the film.
Finally, let me say a few words
about our plans for the coming
year. The next 12 months are
scheduled to. see a_ significant
improvement and expansion of
FONZ services at the Zoo. These
will include:
e A redesign of the parking lots
to provide an improved traffic
flow system.
e Physical improvement of the
main gift shop.
e Complete renovations of the
main restaurant and the Panda
Garden.
e The construction of three
new food facilities: an interna-
tional cafe by the bird house,
a kiosk to serve ice cream, and
a snack kiosk by the small
mammal house. The latter is
already under construction
and should be operating in
the near future.
In the course of planning, finan-
cing, and executing this expansion
program, the FONZ has benefited
trom the cooperation and support
of the leadership and staff of the
National Zoo and the Smithsonian
Institution. We are most apprecia-
tive of their help.
Stephen T. Hosmer
Treasurer
FONZ Offers
New Stickers
Five new bumper stickers are now
available free to FONZ members to
spread the word — in color— about
the wildest club in town.
FONZ bumper stickers have be-
come one of the most popular and
21
1S OF THE NATIONAL ZOO
frequently seen around town and
this new series promises to be even
more popular. Each sticker
measures 14” long by 3*%4”’ wide
and is made of the highest quality
vinyl so that they will not fade and
can be easily removed at any time.
Each has a different color, slogan,
and animal to suit every taste.
Members wishing a free bumper
sticker, which cost 25 cents if
bought at the Zoo shops, need only
contact FONZ at 232-7700 indica-
ting their preference.
The new FONZ bumper stickers are avail-
able to members upon request. The colors
from top to bottom are yellow and black,
blue and white, red and white, white and
blue, and blue and yellow.
LDEST CLUB
TOWN
22
Swept into Rock Creek, a safari train along with other FONZ equipment was damaged by
September floods.
Flood Damages Train
Rampaging waters of Rock Creek
demolished a FONZ tool shed and
swept away forty-five feet of track-
less train during the early morning
hours of September 26.
Fortunately all the animals stayed
high and dry, but in a repeat of the
‘72 Hurricane Agnes disaster, rain-
swollen Rock Creek burst its banks
and dumped five feet of water into
the Zoo garage, electrical and
mechanical shops, and boiler plant.
Some FONZ equipment — like two
trackless train coaches and a gal-
vanized tool shed with all its
contents — were swept downstream.
Fragments were found as far away
as the Kennedy Center. Engines of
two trackless trains and two golf
carts held fast but were under
several feet of muddy water and
may have to be scrapped.
Put a Tiger
On Your Wall
Zoo artist, Warren A. Cutler, has
produced a wildlife portrait as
strikingly beautiful as the subject
herself. The original drawing of
Rewati, the white tiger, is the fifth
in a series of six special prints
prepared exclusively for FONZ.
Other subjects in the popular
series: the giant and lesser pandas,
snowy owl, colobus monkey, and
Jaguar.
The limited edition drawings are
available as a complete set of six
for $60 or individually, if available,
at $10 apiece. Each 18” x 24” litho-
graph is printed on the finest avail-
able paper, numbered and signed
personally by the artist.
FONZ members and friends inter-
ested in obtaining these collector-
quality prints should call 232-7700.