Bothalia
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Vol. 42,1
May 2012
TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL
BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE (SANBI) PRETORIA
Obtainable from SANBI, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001,
RSA. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on
request.
BOTHALIA
Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first
Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South
Africa. This house journal of SANBI, Pretoria, is devoted to
the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered
are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of
the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are
published annually.
Bothalia Contents: five booklets containing a list of authors
and titles, and an index to taxa and keywords: a) to vols 1-20
(1921-1990); b) to vols 21-25 (1991-1995); to vols 26-30
(1996-2000); d) to vols 31-37 (2001-2007); to vols 38^11
(2008-2011).
FLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA (FSA)
A taxonomic treatise on the flora of the Republic of South
Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia and Botswana. Contains
descriptions of families, genera, species, infraspecific taxa,
keys to genera and species, synonymy, literature and limited
specimen citations, as well as taxonomic and ecological notes.
Project discontinued.
FSA contributions 1-19 appear in Bothalia :
1: Aquifoliaceae. S. Andrews. 1994. Bothalia 24: 163-166.
2: Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae, 1029010 Chortolirion. G.F. Smith.
1995. Bothalia 25: 31-33.
3: Asphodelaceae/Aloaceae, 1028010 Poellnitzia. G.F. Smith
1995. Bothalia 25: 35,36.
4: Agavaceae. G.F. Smith & M. Mossmer. 1996. Bothalia 26:
31-35.
5: Buxaceae. H.F. Glen. 1996. Bothalia 26: 37-40.
6: Orchidaceae: Holothrix. K.L. Immelman. 1996. Bothalia 26:
25-40.
7: Verbenaceae: Vitex. C.L. Bredenkamp & D.J. Botha. 1996.
Bothalia 26: 141-151.
8: Ceratophyllaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1997. Bothalia 27:
125-128.
9: Onagraceae. P. Goldblatt & P.H. Raven. 1997. Bothalia 27:
149-165.
10: Trapaceae. B. Verdcourt. 1998. Bothalia 28: 11-14.
1 1: Zingiberaceae. R.M. Smith. 1998. Bothalia 28: 35-39.
12: Plantaginaceae. H.F. Glen. 1998. Bothalia 28: 151-157.
13: Ulmaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1999. Bothalia 29: 239-247.
14: Cannabaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 1999. Bothalia 29:
249-252.
15: Piperaceae. K.L. Immelman. 2000. Bothalia 30: 25-30.
16: Sphenocleaceae. W.G. Welman. 2000. Bothalia 30: 31-33.
17: Casuarinaceae. C.M. Wilmot-Dear. 2000. Bothalia 30:
143-146.
1 8: Salicaceae s. str. M. Jordaan. 2005. Bothalia 35: 7-20.
19: Asteraceae: Anthemideae: Eumorphia. N. Swelankomo.
2011. Bothalia 41: 277-282.
STRELITZIA
A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and
vegetation, replacing Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South
Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens.
• The Memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological
nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic
botany. Published: Nos 1-63 (many out of print). Discontin-
ued after No. 63.
• The Annals are a series devoted to the publication of mono-
graphs and major works on southern African flora. Published:
Vols 14—19 (earlier vols published as suppl. vols to the Jour-
nal of South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19.
FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA)
This serial presents colour plates of African plants with
accompanying text. The plates are prepared mainly by the
artists at SANBI. Many botanical artists have contributed to the
series, such as Fay Anderson, Peter Bally, Auriol Batten, Gillian
Condy, Betty Connell, Stella Gower, Rosemary Holcroft,
Kathleen Lansdell, Cythna Letty (over 700 plates), Claire
Linder-Smith and Ellaphie Ward-Hilhorst. The Editor is pleased
to receive living plants of general interest or of economic value
for illustration.
From Vol. 55, twenty plates are published at irregular intervals.
An index to Vols 1-49 is available.
PALAEOFLORA OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
A palaeoflora on a pattern comparable to that of the Flora
of southern Africa. Much of the information is presented in
the form of tables and photographic plates depicting fossil
populations. Now available:
• Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 1 . Introduction. Dicroidi-
um, 1983, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
• Molteno Formation (Triassic) Vol. 2. Gymnosperms (exclud-
ing Dicroidium ), 1983, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson.
• Prodromus of South African Megafloras. Devonian to Lower
Cretaceous, 1985, by J.M. & H.M. Anderson. Obtainable
from: A. A. Balkema Marketing, Box 317, Claremont 7735,
RSA.
• Towards Gondwana Alive. Promoting biodiversity and stem-
ming the Sixth Extinction, 1999, by J.M. Anderson (ed.).
• Heyday of the gymnosperms: systematics and biodiversity
of the Late Triassic Molteno fructifications, 2003, by J.M.
Anderson & H.M. Anderson. Strelitzia 15.
• Brief history of the gymnosperms: classification, biodiver-
sity, phytogeography and ecology, 2007, by J.M. Anderson,
H.M. Anderson & C.J. Cleal. Strelitzia 20.
• Molteno ferns: Late Triassic biodiversity in southern Africa,
2008, by H.M. Anderson & J.M. Anderson. Strelitzia 21.
SANBI BIODIVERSITY SERIES
A series of occasional reports on projects, technologies,
workshops, symposia and other activities initated by or executed
in partnership with SANBI.
BOTHALIA
A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH
Volume 42,1
Scientific Editor: J.C. Manning
Production Editor: Y. Steenkamp
SANBI
Biodiversity for Life
t
yi
%
2 Cussonia Avenue, Brummeria, Pretoria
Private Bag XI 01, Pretoria 0001
ISSN 0006 8241
Private Bag X 101 PRETORIA 0001
1 ~ JUlM L\iii 7
Privaatsak X 101 PRETORIA 0001
e A BVI Q I
May 2012
Editorial Board
D.F. Cutler
B.J. Huntley
P.H. Raven
M.J.A. Werger
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA
Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, USA
University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Acknowledgements to referees
Archer, Mrs C. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Bergh, Dr N. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Boatwright, Dr J.S. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Burgoyne, Ms P. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Coates Palgrave, Mrs M. P.O. Chisipite, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Coetzer, Dr L.A. ex University of Pretoria, Pretoria, RSA.
Geerinck, Dr D. Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Geldenhuys, Mr C. Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation, Springbok,
RSA.
Germishuizen. Mr G. ex South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Hermann, Mr P.P.J. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Hind. Dr D.J.N. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Klak, Ms C. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, RSA.
Koekemoer, Dr M. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Leistner, Dr O. ex South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA.
Manning, Dr J.C. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Martinez-Azorin, Dr M. Instituto Universitario de la Biodiversidad, Alicante, Spain.
Renner, Prof. Dr S. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat, Miinchen, Germany.
Roux, Dr J.P. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Schrire, Dr B. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Snijman, Dr D. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA.
Trias Blasi, Dr A. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
Vogel, Dr J. Natural History Museum, London. England, UK.
Date of publication of Bothalia 41,2
Oct. 2011.
CONTENTS
Bothalia 42,1
1. Revision of the genus Sphenosty’lis (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) in South Africa and Swaziland. A.N.
MOTEETEE and B.-E. VAN WYK 1
2. Anatomy of myxospermic diaspores of selected species in the Succulent Karoo, Namaqualand,
South Africa. H. FOTOUO MAKOUATE, M.W. VAN ROOYEN and C.F. VAN DER
MERWE 7
3. Recircumscription and distribution of elements of the ‘ Ceterach cordatwn complex ( Aspleniunr.
Aspleniaceae) in southern Africa. R.R. KLOPPER and N.R. CROUCH 15
4. A revision of Tecophilaeaceae subfam. Tecophilaeoideae in Africa. J.C. MANNING and P.
GOLDBLATT 21
5. Notes on African plants:
Aizoaceae. Corpuscularia gracillima is the correct binomial for the illegitimate C. gracilis. J.
NIEDERLE 49
Asteraceae. Berkheva jardineana ( Arctotideae — Gorteriinae), a new dwarf perennial from the
Swartruggens, Western Cape. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 57
Asteraceae. Osteospermum norlindhianum and O. nordenstamii, two new species of Osteo-
spermum sect. Trefenestratae (Calenduleae) from the Greater Cape Floristic Region.
J.C. MANNING, P. GOLDBLATT and N.A. HELME 59
Fabaceae. A new species of Bauhinia from southern Mozambique and the reinstatement of
Bauhinia macrantha. E.J.D. SCHMIDT 44
Hyacinthaceae. Drimia echinostachya , correcting a nomenclatural oversight. U. EGGLI and
N.R. CROUCH 43
Hyacinthaceae. New combinations in Ledebouria. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 47
Iridaceae. Taxonomic notes on Moraea (Irideae) in Congo and adjacent countries. P. GOLD-
BLATT and J.C. MANNING 49
Monimiaceae. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the monotypic genus Xymalos and gen-
eral information on the family Monimiaceae. M. JORDAAN and M. LOTTER .... 51
6. Obituary. Eduardo Jose dos Santos Moreira Mendes (1924-2011). G.F. SMITH, E. FIGUEIRE-
DO and L. CATARINO 67
7. Obituary. Kathleen Dixon Gordon-Gray (nee Huntley) (1918-2012). E.J. MOLL 69
New combinations, names, sections, series, species and statuses in Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
Bauhinia burrowsii E.J.D. Schmidt, 44
Berkheya jardineana J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 57
Corpuscularia gracillima (L. Bolus) Niederle, comb, nov., 49
Cyanella lutea L.f subsp. rosea (Eckl. ex Baker) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , stat. nov., 37
Cyanella marlothii J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , sp. nov., 28
Drimia echinostachya (Baker) Eggli & N.R. Crouch, comb, nov., 43
Ledebouria linioseta (A.J.Hankey & P.D.Lebatha) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , comb, nov., 48
Ledebouria transvaalensis (Van der Merwe ) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb, nov., 48
Moraea schaijesiorum Geerinck, syn. nov., 50
Moraea ventricosa f. boussardiana Geerinck, syn. nov., 50
Moraea ventricosa var. macrantha f. wit tea na Geerinck, syn. nov., 50
Ornithogalum cooperi Baker, syn. nov., 43
Osteospermum nordenstamii J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 62
Osteospermum norlindhianum J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp. nov., 60
Section Drimiopsis (Lindl. & Paxton) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, stat. nov., 48
Section Resnova (Van der Merwe) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, stat. nov., 48
Series Hyacinthoides J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, ser. nov., 32
Series Luteae J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, ser. nov., 35
IV
Bothalia 42,1: 1-6(2012)
Revision of the genus Sphenostylis (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) in South
Africa and Swaziland
A.N. MOTEETEE*f and B.-E. VAN WYK*
Keywords: Fabaceae, Leguminosae, Nesphostylis Verde., Phaseoleae, Phaseolinae, southern Africa, Sphenostylis E.Mey., Vigna Savi
ABSTRACT
A taxonomic revision of the genus Sphenostylis E.Mey. (tribe Phaseoleae) in southern Africa is presented. The genus is
distinguishable by its characteristic wedge-shaped, dorsiventrally flattened style tip. Of the seven known species in the genus,
only two, S. angustifolia and S. marginata, occur in South Africa and Swaziland; and the former is endemic to these countries.
The two species differ in the size, shape, and venation of the leaflets; as well as the length of the petiole, peduncle, and pod. A
key to the two species is provided and the correct nomenclature, typification, and known geographical distributions are given.
INTRODUCTION
Sphenostylis E.Mey. belongs to the subtribe Phaseo-
linae of tribe Phaseoleae (Fabaceae). It is named for
the wedge-shaped, dorsiventrally flattened style (from
the Greek word spheno = wedge). It is a small genus
comprising seven species, all occurring in the tro-
pics and southern parts of the African continent (Gillett
et al. 1971; Potter 1992; Potter & Doyle 1994; Schrire
2005). The Indian species S. bracteata (Baker) Gillett,
transferred from Dolichos L. to Sphenostylis by Gillett
(1966), was moved to Nesphostylis Verde, by Potter &
Doyle (1994) based on a cladistic analysis of morpho-
logical data. Three species of Sphenostylis are used as
food sources in Africa. Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst.
ex A. Rich.) Harms is known as African yam bean or
girigiri (Burkhill 1995), and cultivars of this tropical
African species are grown for their seeds and tubers in
tropical and West Africa. The leaves, flowers, pods, and
seeds of S. schweinfurthii Harms and S. erecta Hutch, ex
Baker f. are wild-harvested. The roots of S. erecta are
also used as fish poison (Potter 1992).
Sphenostylis appears to have a close relationship with
Nesphostylis (Potter & Doyle 1994) with which it shares
the dorsiventrally flattened style tip; but it differs by fea-
tures of the calyx (Lackey 1981), the standard petals,
and the stamens (Potter 1992). In Nesphostylis , the inner
surface of the calyx is pubescent, standard appendages
are present, the base of the vexillary stamen is hooked,
and the stamen apices are dilated. None of these cha-
racters are present in Sphenostylis. Based mainly on the
narrow pods, several botanists including Harvey (1862),
Bentham (1865) and Taubert (1894), relegated Spheno-
stylis into synonymy with the genus Vigna Savi (Gillett
1966). Harms (1899) reinstated the genus and expanded
it to include related species previously placed in Doli-
chos and Vigna. Sphenostylis differs from these two
genera by its distinctive style tip. Furthermore, Vigna
generally has peltate stipules (stipules not peltate in
Sphenostylis). In addition, a phylogeny based on mole-
cular data shows that Vigna and Sphenostylis are not
* Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Jo-
hannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 Johannesburg.
|amoteetee@uj.ac.za.
MS. received: 2011-03-04.
as closely related as previously thought, and that Sphe-
nostylis is rather closer to Dolichos and Macrotyloma
(Wight & Am.) Verde. (Wojciechowski et al. 2004).
Sphenostylis can be distinguished from Dolichos, Ma-
crotyloma, and Vigna by the absence of appendages on
the standard petals (appendages present on the standard
petals in the latter three genera).
Sphenostylis is represented in South Africa and Swa-
ziland by two species, namely S. angustifolia Sond. and
S. marginata E.Mey.; the former being endemic to the
two countries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material was studied mainly from herbarium
specimens housed in JRAU, NH, NU, and PRE (acro-
nyms after Holmgren et al. 1990); and also in the field.
Habit affinities are described according to Mucina &
Rutherford (2006).
TAXONOMY
Sphenostylis E.Mey., Commentariorum de Plantis
Africae Australioris: 148 (1836); Baker fi: 670 (1929);
Burtt Davy: 418 (1932); E. Phillips: 427 (1951); Wilc-
zek: 273 (1954); Verde.: 389 (1970); J.B.Gillett et al.:
670 (1971); Compton: 286 (1975); R. A. Dyer: 275
(1975); Potter & Doyle: 389-406 (1994); Germish.: 296
(2000); Verde. & Doygaard: 68 (2001). Type species:
S. marginata E.Mey.
Prostrate, climbing (twining), or erect shrubs or per-
ennial herbs, arising from a thick, woody rootstock.
Leaves pinnately 3-foliolate (Figure ID); stipules per-
sistent, ovate-lanceolate or ovate-acuminate; leaflets
ovate, elliptic or linear, with four linear stipels, one at
the base of each lateral leaflet and two at the base of the
terminal one (Figure IE), appressed-pubescent when
young but becoming glabrescent with age. Inflorescence:
flowers in congested heads on long peduncles, peduncles
much longer than leaves; bracts linear or oblong-lan-
ceolate, small, falling off at a very early stage or absent;
bracteoles 2, ovate-lanceolate or oblong-ovate, caducous
or persistent. Calyx tube campanulate, bilabiate, the two
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 1. — Sphenostylis marginata (A, B, D) and S. angustifolia (C, E-H): A, flowers showing the twisted standard petals; B, flower showing
the cuneate style tip; C, keel tip and cuneate style tip; D, leaf in adaxial view; E, flowering branch (note the stipules and stipels); F, pod; G,
flower in front view (note the twisted petals); H, seed. Scale bars: A, 8 mm; B, 12 mm; C, E-G: 5 mm; D, H: 2 mm. Photographs: A, B, D
by David Styles; C, E-H by Ben-Erik van Wyk.
lobes of the upper lip partially or entirely connate, lobes
very short and blunt. Corolla purple, purplish pink, vio-
let, whitish pink, or yellow; standard suborbicular, sym-
metrical or twisted (Figure 1A & 1G) with 2 indexed
auricles, but without appendages, with well-developed,
channelled claw; wings obliquely obovate, eared near
base, with short linear claw; keel incurved, ± concave-
convex beaked, with short linear claw. Androecium
diadelphous (with 9 stamens fused into a tube, vexil-
lary stamen free), 5 basifixed anthers alternating with 5
dorsifixed anthers. Ovary narrowly oblong, pubescent,
3 12-ovuled; style penicillate below the stigma; stigma
dorsiventrally flattened, ciliate on the margins (Figures
IB & 1C). Fruit linear, compressed, twisting after dehis-
cence, glabrescent to densely silky, with persistent style
at tip (Figure I F), 2-several-seeded, dehiscent. Seeds
oblong, uniformly black or brown to reddish brown
speckled black, minutely papillose (Figure 1H).
Key to species of Sphenostylis in South Africa and
Swaziland:
la Leaflets 20—45 mm wide; petiole 50-70 mm long; peduncles
220-300 mm long; fruit 95-120 mm long S. marginata
lb Leaflets 10-19 mm wide; petiole 8-16 mm long; peduncles
75-1 15 mm long; fruit 55-85 mm long S. angustifolia
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
3
1. Sphenostylis angustifolia Sond. in Linnaea 23:
33 (1850); R.A.Dyer: t 1010 (1947); Burtt Davy: 418
(1932); Compton: 287 (1975). Vigna angustifolia (Sond.)
Benth. ex Harv.: 240 (1862). Type: South Africa, Gau-
teng, 2528 (Pretoria): Magaliesberg, (-DC), Zeyher 524
(S, specimen on the left, lecto.!, here designated; BM!,
K!, isolecto.). Syntype: KwaZulu-Natal, 2931 (Stanger):
Port Natal [now Durban], (-CC), Gueinzius 624 ( S ! ).
Note: the Zeyher specimen in the Sonder Herbarium
in S is chosen as lectotype because this is probably the
specimen that Sonder used in his description. The twig
on the left is chosen because it bears a flower and some
immature fruits. Curiously Potter (in sched.) chose the
Zeyher specimen in K as lectotype but this choice was
apparently never published.
Erect suffrutex, rarely climbing and twining, much-
branched, up to 0.5 m tall, spreading. Leaflets oblong or
linear-lanceolate, 30-60 x ( 7—) 1 0—1 9 mm; petiole 8-16
mm long; stipules ovate-acuminate, 3. 5-5.0 x 2-3 mm.
Inflorescences subumbellate axillary racemes; peduncles
(55 — )75— 1 1 5 mm long, with 2-4 flowers; flowers pink
or purple, with a whitish or yellowish centre, 12-25 mm
long; bracts linear, ± 1 .5 mm long, caducous; bracteoles
ovate-lanceolate, 2. 0-2. 5 x ± 1.5 mm, persistent. Calyx
sparsely pubescent, with ± equal lips, upper lip 6-8 mm
long, lower lip 6-8 mm long; lobes rounded, those of the
upper lip joined for almost their entire length. Corolla
pinkish red; standard suborbicular, 15-25 x 15-26 mm,
glabrous; wings obovate, 14-24 * 4-7 mm, without sur-
face sculpturing, apex rounded; keel falcate, 14—24 x
6-10 mm, apex rounded, pocket absent. Ovary 9-13 mm
long, linear-oblong. Fruit linear, 55-85 x 5-6 mm, gla-
brescent, many-seeded. Seeds reniform, ± 7 x ± 4 mm,
brown, reddish brown speckled black, or uniformly
black (Figure 2). Flowering time : Sept.-Feb.
Diagnostic characters'. Based on Potter & Doyle’s
cladistic analysis (1994), Sphenostylis angustifolia
appears to have close affinities with S. zimbabweensis
R.Mithen, which is restricted to the Highlands of Zim-
babwe. The two species share the deciduous bracts and
the persistent bracteoles. Sphenostylis zimbabweensis
is, however, differentiated by the more prostrate growth
form (as opposed to the erect growth form of S. angusti-
folia)1, and the broader, ovate to elliptic leaflets (leaflets
narrower and oblong to linear-lanceolate in S. angus-
tifolia). Sphenostylis angustifolia can be distinguished
from S. marginata by the narrower leaflets and the much
shorter petioles, peduncles, and pods (dimensions are
given in the key).
Distribution and habitat'. Sphenostylis angustifolia
occurs in South Africa (Fimpopo, North-West, Gauteng,
Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces) and Swazi-
land (Figure 3). It grows scattered in Zeerust Thornveld
(SVcb 3), Central Sandy Bushveld (SVcb 12), Soutpans-
berg Mountain Bushveld (SVcb 21), Polokwane Plateau
Bushveld (SVcb 23), Granite Fowveld (SV1 3), Tza-
FIGURE 2. — Vegetative and reproductive morphology of Sphenostylis angustifolia'. A, flowering branch; B1 & B2, abaxial view of bracteoles; C,
calyx opened out with upper lobes to left; D, standard petal; E, wing petal; F, keel petal; G, stamens; H, pistil; I. lateral view of pod. Vouch-
ers; A from A.O.D. Mogg 35461 (JRAU); B-I from B-E. van Wyk 1438 (JRAU). Scale bar: A, 30 mm; B, 1 mm; C-F, H, 3 mm; G, 2 mm;
I, 10 mm.
4
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Sphenostylis angustifolia.
neen Sour Bushveld (SVI 8), Legogote Sour Bushveld
(SVI 9), Swaziland Sour Bushveld (SVI 14), Southern
Lebombo Bushveld (SVI 16), Carletonville Dolomite
Grassland (Gh 15), Soweto Highveld Grassland (Gm 8),
Rand Highveld Grassland (Gm 11), KaNgwane Montane
Grassland (Gm 16), Maputaland Coasal Belt (CB 1),
KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belt (CB 3).
Additional specimens examined
LIMPOPO. — 2230 (Messina): Soutpansberg, Entabeni Forestry
Station at Muchindudi Fall, (-CC), 27 Jan. 1954, L.E. Codd 8392
(PRE). 2329 (Polokwane): Polokwane, Farm Eersteling, on slope of
mtn, (-AB), 1 Jan. 1992, G.J. du Toit 2238 (NH). 2330 (Tzaneen):
Modjadjis Reserve near Duiwelskloof, (-CB), 24 May 1938, J.D.
Krige 164 (PRE). 2428 (Nylstroom): Waterberg, (-AD). 6 Nov. 1978,
G. Germishuizen 909 (PRE); Naboomfontein, (-BD), 13 Dec. 1934,
E.E. Galpin 133130 (PRE); between Warmbaths and Pietersburg
[Polokwane], (-CB), 4 Nov. 1985, B.J. Pienaar 636 (PRE); 18 km
from Nylstroom on road to Warmbaths near Groot Nyl turn-off, (—
CD), 4 Nov. 1985, G. Germishuizen 3347 (PRE). 2429 (Zebediela):
near Daggakraal 50 m NE of Potgietersrus, (-AA), 3 Jan. 1954, B.
Maguire 2569 (PRE); Arabie, Camp 1, (-CD), 7 Jan. 2007, W. Ellery
357 (PRE). 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Lekgalameetse Nature Reserve,
The Downs, SE of Makwens, (-AA), 16 Oct. 1985, M. Stalmans 718
(PRE).
NORTH-WEST.— 2526 (Zeerust): Marico Distr., ± 10 km NE of
Wondergat, (-CD), 6 Feb. 1983, C. Reid 676 (PRE). 2527 (Rusten-
burg): Rustenburg Nature Reserve, (-CA), 27 Feb. 1970, N. Jacobsen
845 (PRE). 2627 (Potchefstroom): on road from Frederikstad to Rys-
mierbult, (-AC), 31 Oct. 1978, B. Ubbink 733 (PRE); Ventersdorp,
Goedgedacht, (-CA), 29 Dec. 1930, J.D. Sutton 511 (PRE).
GAUTENG. — 2528 (Pretoria): La Montagne Rand, N of Cham-
bord W/S, (-CA), 30 Sept. 1978, A.E. van Wyk 2405 (PRE); 28 miles
[45 km] from the National Herbarium on road to Boekenshoutskloof,
(-CB), 15 Apr. 1971, L.A. Coetzer 73 (PRE); Fountains Valley, (-
CC), 3 Oct. 1948, J.M. Watt 4565 (PRE); Doomkloof, Smutskoppie,
(-CD); 24 Nov. 1985, B-E. van Wyk 1438 (JRAU); Renosterkop, NE
of Bronkhorstspruit, (-DB); 6 Dec. 1987, B-E. van Wyk 2730 (JRAU).
2628 (Johannesburg): Melville Koppies Nature Reserve, (-AA), 4
Feb. 1987, B-E. van Wyk 2600-2604 (JRAU); Heidelberg, (-AD), Nov.
1927, A. Thode A1 311 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Drie Rondavels look-
out. (-BC), 2 Feb. 1982, A.E. van Wyk, R. Dahlgren & P.D.F. Kok
5487 (PRE). 2529 (Witbank): Loskopdam Game Reserve, (-AD),
13 Dec. 1966, G.K. Theron 728 (JRAU, PRE); between Witbank
and Middelburg along N4 highway, (-CD), 20 Feb. 1991, P. Her-
man 1338 (PRE). 2530 (Lydenburg): 7 km S of Sabie, (-BB), 29
Sept. 2005, J.J. Meyer 4530 (PRE); Wonderkloof Nature Reserve, (—
BC), 17 Nov. 1978, J.P. Kluge 1408 (PRE). 2531 (Komatipoort): Ka-
Ngwane, Songimvelo Game Reserve, (-CC), 8 Dec. 1992, N.L. Meyer
29 (PRE).
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Hhohho Dist., Nyokane, 15 km
from Piggs Peak-Mbabane turnoff on road to Maphalaleni, (-AB),
23 Oct. 1963, R.H. Compton 31707 (PRE); Dabriach, (-AC), 18 Oct.
1958, R.H. Compton 28097 (PRE); Hlatikulu, (-CD), Oct. 1910, M
Steward 10081 (PRE). 2632 (Bela Vista): Lebombo Mountains, near
fence separating Swaziland and Mozambique, (-CA), 22 Nov. 2002,
M.K. Maserumule 74 (PRE).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2930 (Pietermaritzburg): Beacon Hill, off
Panorama Terrace, Wyebank, (-DD), 10 Jan. 2005, D. Styles 2180
(NH).
2. Sphenostylis marginata E.Mey., Commentari-
orum de Plantis Africae Australioris: 148 (Feb. 1836);
Baker f.: 148 (1929); Wilczek 6: 274 (1954); Verdoorn:
t. 1521 (1968); J.B.Gillett et ah: 671 (1971); Compton:
287 (1975); Lock: 438 (1989); Potter & Doyle: 403
(1994); Verde. & Doygaard.: 71 (2001). Vigna margin-
ata (E.Mey.) Benth. ex Harv.: 240 (1862); De Wild.: 98
(1921). Type: KwaZulu-Natal, 3030 (Port Shepstone):
’ in graminosis ad ostia fluvii Omsamculo' [mouth of
Umzimkulu River], (-CB), Drege s.n. (K!, lecto., desig-
nated by Potter & Doyle (1994) [as ‘holo’.], G!, MO!,
P!, isolecto.)
Note: although the P specimen which bears an origi-
nal Drege label with locality details corresponding
exactly to those given in the prognosis as well as Mey-
er’s handwriting (fmihV) would have been more appro-
priately selected as lectotype. Potter & Doyle’s (1994)
designation of the K specimen as the holotype consti-
tutes effective lectotypification (Art. 9.8).
Prostrate suffrutex with twining stems up to 1.5 m
long, arising from a woody rootstock. Leaflets ovate,
elliptic or oblong, 45—1 1 0(— 125) x 20 — 40( — 45) mm; pet-
iole ( 1 5— )50— 70 mm long; stipules oblong-lanceolate or
ovate, 3-7 x 2-4 mm. Inflorescence pseudo-umbellate,
axillary raceme, long-stalked; peduncles 220-300 mm
long, few-flowered; flowers mauve, 14-16 mm long;
bracts oblong-lanceolate, ± 1.5 mm long, caducous,
bracteoles ovate-lanceolate, 2-3 x 1. 5-2.0 mm, persist-
ent. Calyx pubescent, lobes rounded, with equal lips,
upper and lower lips 5-6 mm long, lobes of upper lip
joined for almost their entire length. Corolla pinkish
red; standard broadly obovate, 13-17 x 14-23 mm, gla-
brous; wings obovate, deep purplish pink 10-17 x 4-6
mm, without surface sculpturing, apex rounded; keel ±
equal to wings, 12-18 x 4-6 mm, paler or white, apex
rounded, pocket absent. Ovary 10-15 mm long, linear-
oblong. Fruit linear, 95-120 x 4-8 mm, glabrescent,
5-8-seeded. Seeds reniform, ± 5.0 x ± 3.5 mm, brown
or reddish brown speckled black (Figure 4). Flowering
time : Nov.-Feb.
Diagnostic characters : Sphenostylis marginata dif-
fers from S. angustifolia in having broader leaflets and
longer petioles, peduncles, and pods (see key for dimen-
sions).
Verdcourt (1970) divided what he called the Spheno-
stylis marginata complex, which included the two cen-
tral and East African species S. erecta (Baker f.) Baker f.
and S. obtusifolia Harms, into three subspecies, namely
subsp. marginata (occurring only in South Africa and
Swaziland), subsp. obtusifolia (Harms) Verde., and
subsp erecta (Baker f.) Verde. However, based on mor-
phological and DNA data. Potter & Doyle (1994) pro-
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
5
FIGURE 4. — Vegetative and reproductive morphology of Sphenostvlis marginata: Al, flowering branch; A2, inflorescence; B1 & B2, abaxial view
of bracteoles; C, calyx opened out with upper lobes to left; D, standard petal; E, wing petal; F, keel petal; G, stamens; H, pistil; I, lateral view
of pod. Vouchers; A from N. Grobbelaar 1648 (PRE); B-F from Commins 855 (PRE); H from Acocks 20928 (PRE); I from N. Grobbelaar
1648 (PRE). Scale bar: Al, A2, 30 mm; B, 1 mm; C, 2 mm; D-F, H, 3 mm; G, 4 mm; I, 15 mm.
posed a narrow view of S. marginata by limiting the
species concept to subsp. marginata (the other two sub-
species were excluded). Sphenostylis marginata subsp.
erecta was restored to species level and subspecies
obtusifolia was transferred to 5. erecta (as subspecies).
Distribution and habitat: Sphenostylis marginata
occurs in South Africa (Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Kwa-
Zulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces), and Swaziland
(Figure 5). It grows in Central Sandy Bushveld (SVcb
12), Ohrigstad Mountain Bushveld (SVcb 26), Gran-
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Sphenostylis marginata.
ite Lowveld (SVI 3), Legogote Sour Bushveld (SVI
9), Zululand Lowveld (SVI 23), PaulPietersburg Moist
Grassland (Gm 15), KaNgwane Montane Grassland (Gm
16), Income Sandy Grassland (Gs 7), Ngongoni Veld
(SVs 4), Eastern Valley Bushveld (SVs 6), Maputaland
Coasal Belt (CB 1), and KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belt
(CB 3).
Additional specimens examined
LIMPOPO. — 2428 (Nylstroom): 13 km NE of Wannbaths [Bela-
Bela] on road to Nylstroom, (-CD), 18 Nov. 1981, C. Reid 439 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): foothills SE of
Magalieskop, Mariepskop Dist., (-DB), 6 Dec. 1990, H.P. van der
Schijf 5878 (PRE). 2531 (Komatipoort): 25 km from White River to
Hazyview, near White Waters Forest Station, (-AA), 3 Jan. 1984, M
Jordaan 298 (PRE); Kruger National Park, Lower Sabie dam, (-BB),
26 Nov. 1990, V.R. Bredenkamp 468 (PRE); Eerste Geluk no. 16,
Uitkyk, (-CA), 26 Mar. 1975, C.H. Stirton 1729 (PRE).
SWAZILAND. — 2631 (Mbabane): Hhohho Dist., Masilela
area, on Maphalaleni Rd., (-AB), 27 Jan. 1994, G. Ger-
mishuizen 7152 (PRE); Little Usutu River, (-AC), 27 Oct.
1956, R.H. Compton 26163 (NH, PRE); Stegi, (-BD), 22
Dec. 1960, R.H. Compton 30388 (NH, PRE); S of Mankai-
ana, (-CA), 6 Nov. 1949, J.L. Sidey 1933 (PRE). 2731 (Louws-
burg): at camp on hilltop before reaching Hluti, (-BA), 8 1931, LB.
Pole-Evans 3364 (PRE).
KWAZULU-NATAL. — 2730 (Vryheid): 0.9 km towards Vryheid
from Natal Spa, Freddie Coetzee’s farm, (-BD), 2 Dec. 1988, P.D.F.
Kok & B.J. Pienaar 1282 (PRE). 2731 (Louwsburg): Nongoma, (-
DC), 20 Nov. 1960, M.J. Wells 2060 (PRE). 2830 (Dundee): hill near
Glencoe, (-AA), 22 Feb. 1993, J. Medley-Wood 4823 (PRE); Dundee
Dist., on banks of Buffalo River, 1 km S of P.O. Vantsdrift, (-AB),
22 Dec. 1946, L.E. Codd 2377 (PRE); Elandslaagte, Blanerne Farm,
6
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
32 km from Ladysmith on road to Newcastle, (-BA), 15 Nov. 1994,
A.M. Ngwenya 1295 (PRE). 2831 (Nkandla): Babanango Dist., val-
ley N of Izulu Hill, (-CC), 16 Jan. 1946, J.P.H. Acocks 12317 (PRE).
2832 (Mtubatuba): Masundwini, Hluhluwe Game Reserve, (-AA), 7
Nov. 1971, P.M. Hitchins 635 (NU, PRE); Palm Ridge Farm, (-AC),
3 Oct. 1967, E.R. Harrison 128 (PRE). 2931 (Stanger): Twinstreams
Farm, Mtunzini, (-DC), 12 Oct. 1984, I. Garland s.n.. & G. Nichols
805 (PRE). 3030 (Port Shepstone): St Michaels-on-Sea, (-AB), 1 Feb.
1985, B.J. Pienaar 587 (PRE); Port Shepstone (-CD), 24 Mar. 1967,
R.G. Strey 7420 (PRE); Hibberdene, (-DA), 09 Mar. 1970, R.G. Strey
9701 (NU).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The curator of PRE is gratefully acknowledged for
assistance with herbarium material and the curator of P
is thanked for the image of the Sphenostylis marginata
type specimen. The University of Johannesburg and the
National Research Foundation provided financial sup-
port. We thank David Styles for showing us a population
of S', marginata and for providing photographs of the
species.
REFERENCES
BAKER, E.G. 1929. The Leguminosae of tropical Africa 1: 148. Eras-
mus Press, Gent.
BENTHAM, G. 1862. Leguminosae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder
(eds). Flora capensis 2: 240. Hodges, Smith, Dublin.
BENTHAM, G. 1865. LVI1. Leguminosae. Genera plantarmr 1, 2: 539.
Lovell Reeve, London.
BLIRKHILL, H.M. 1995. The useful plants of West tropical Africa, edn
2: 447. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
BURTT DAVY, J. 1 932. Papilionaceae. Manual of the Flowering Plants
and Ferns of the Transvaal with Swaziland. South Africa: 418.
Longmans, Green & Co., London.
COMPTON, R.H. 1975. Flora of Swaziland. South African Journal of
Botany, suppl. 11: 286.
DE WILDEMAN, E.A.J. 1921. Contribution a T etude de la flore du
Katanga: 98. D. Reynaert, Bruxelles [Brussels].
DYER, R.A. 1947. Sphenostylis angustifolia. Flowering plants of Afri-
ca: t. 1010.
DYER, R.A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants:
275. Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Botanical
Research Institute, Pretoria.
GERMISHUIZEN, G. 2000. Fabaceae. In O.A. Leistner (ed.). Seed
plants of southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 296.
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
GILLETT, J.B. 1966. Notes on Leguminoseae (Phaseoleae). 1. Sphe-
nostylis E.Mey., a leguminous genus hitherto unrecognized in
India. Kew Bulletin 20: 1 03-1 11.
GILLETT, J.B.. POLHILL, R.M. & VERDCOURT, B. (eds). 1971.
Flora of tropica! East Africa 3: 671. Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew.
HARMS, H. 1899. Leguminosae africanae II. Botanische Jahrbucher
fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie , 26:
253-324.
HARVEY, W. 1862. Leguminosae. In W.H. Harvey & O.W. Sonder
(eds), Flora capensis 2: 239. Hodges, Smith, Dublin.
LACKEY, J.A. 1981. Tribe 10. Phaseoleae. In R.M. Polhill & P.H.
Raven(eds ), Advances in legume systematics, 1: 301-327. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
LOCK, J.M. 1989. Legumes of Afi-ica: a check-list. Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew.
MEYER, E.H.F. 1836. Commentariorum de plantes Africae australis 1:
65-75. Leopoldum voss, Leipzig.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants.
Botanical Survey Memoir no. 25: 427. Department of Agricul-
ture, South Africa.
POTTER, D. 1992. Economic botany of Sphenostylis (Leguminosae).
Economic Botany 46: 262-275.
POTTER, D. & DOYLE, J.J. 1994. Phylogeny and systematics of Sphe-
nostylis and Nesphostvlis (Leguminosae: Phaseoleae) based on
morphological and chloroplast DNA data. Systematic Botany 19:
389—406. "
SAVI, G. 1824. Phaseoli. Nuovo Giomale dei Letterati 8: 113. Sebas-
tiano Nistri, Pisa.
SCHRIRE, B.D. 2005. Phaseoleae. In G. Lewis, B.D. Schrire, B. Mac-
kinder, & M. Lock, Legumes of the World: 393 — 430. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
SONDER, O.W. 1850. Beitrage zur Flora von Siidafrica. Linnaea 23:
33. Berlin.
TAUBERT. P 1 894. Leguminosae. In A. Engler & K. Prantl, Die natiir-
lichen Pflanzenfamilien 3: 70-399. Engelmann, Leipzig.
VERDCOURT. B. 1970. Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for
the Flora of tropical east Africa: 111. Kew Bulletin 24: 380—442.
VERDCOURT, B. & DOYGAARD, S. 2001. Sphenostylis. In G.V.
Pope & R.M. Polhill (eds). Flora Zambesiaca 3, 5: 68. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew.
VERDOORN, I.C. 1968. Sphenostylis marginata. Flowering plants of
Africa: t. 1521.
WILCZEK, R. 1 954. Phaseolinae. Flore du Congo Beige et du Ruanda-
Urundi VI: 274. Institut National pour l’Etude Agronomique du
Congo Beige, Brussels.
WOJCIECHOWSKI, M.F., LAVIN, M. & SANDERSON, M.J. 2004.
A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of
the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades
within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1846-1862.
Bothalia 42,1: 7-13 (2012)
Anatomy of myxospermic diaspores of selected species in the
Succulent Karoo, Namaqualand, South Africa
H. FOTOUO MAKOUATE*, M.W. VAN ROOYEN*t and C.F. VAN DER MERWE**
Keywords: arid regions, diaspores, dispersal, myxospermy, Namaqualand, scanning electron microscopy. Succulent Karoo
ABSTRACT
Environmental conditions encountered in arid ecosystems differ vastly from those in more mesic ecosystems. Dispersal
strategies in arid environments reflect these differences and many mechanisms have evolved that restrict or hinder dispersal.
Myxospermy is a trait developed by plant species from arid regions to restrict diaspore dispersal by means of an anchorage
mechanism. Several of the abundant plant species in Namaqualand, within the arid Succulent Karoo Biome, display myxo-
spermy. Diaspores of these species produce copious amounts of mucilage when they are moistened and are anchored to the
soil once the mucilage dries out again. This study investigated the origin of the mucilaginous layer of 12 species anatomically,
using both light and scanning electron microscopy. The mucilage production of the species investigated could best be grouped
into three types: 1, epidermal and sub-epidermal cells of seeds and achenes; 2, specialized tissue in wings or the pappus of
achenes; and 3, mucilage excreting hairs. Previous systems for classifying the different types of mucilage production did not
recognize the mucilaginous nature of wings or a pappus. A short note on the composition of the mucilage is included.
INTRODUCTION
Plants have developed many functional traits that
allow them to adapt and survive in different environ-
ments. Seed dispersal is an important functional trait
that influences the population structure and the spatial
and temporal turnover of species within a plant commu-
nity. Myxospermy is the phenomenon where the epider-
mis of the diaspore (seed/fruit) contains mucilaginous
cells, which swell and become sticky when in contact
with water (Gutterman & Shem-Tov 1997; Van Rheede
van Oudtshoom & Van Rooyen 1999). Myxospermy is
classified as an antitelechoric dispersal mechanism and
is encountered more often in arid than in mesic envi-
ronments. The original explanation for the prevalence
of antitelechory in desert environments was that these
mechanisms were adaptive responses to the particularly
high mortality of dispersed seeds in deserts and that
they had evolved as mechanisms to reclaim the mother
site (Murbeck 1919; Zohary 1937; Stopp 1958; Ell-
ner & Shmida 1981; Van Rooyen et al. 1990). Ellner &
Shmida (1981 ) however, argued that antitelechory was a
side effect of characters whose adaptive value was not
directly related to dispersal. Among the benefits derived
from antitelechory are the spreading of germination over
time and the provision of suitable conditions for germi-
nation and subsequent seedling establishment.
There are many divergent ideas about the ecological
importance of myxospermy, and it probably fulfils vari-
ous functions. When wet, myxospermic diaspores adhere
to the soil; and after drying out, remain glued to soil par-
ticles and thus resist being carried to unfavourable loca-
tions by wind. Flowever, wet diaspores can also adhere to
the feet or fur of animals and be dispersed zoochorically.
The good contact between the mucilage layer and the
soil surface increases water absorption for germination.
* Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria,
t greteI.vanrooyen@up.ac.za.
** Laboratory for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Preto-
ria, 0002 Pretoria.
MS. received: 2010-01-15.
and as a result, myxospermic species germinate more
successfully on the surface of the soil than non-myxo-
spermic species (Bregman & Graven 1997; Zaady et al.
1997; Van Rheede van Oudtshoom & Van Rooyen 1999).
The water held by the mucilage could also serve as a
water reservoir for seedling establishment (Gutterman
et al. 1967; Gutterman 1993, 1996), although this func-
tion of the mucilage has been challenged (Murbeck 1919;
Grubert 1974). Furthermore, the adherence of the seed to
the soil by the mucilage prevents massive collection by
seed predators (Gutterman 1993), and the repeated wet-
ting of mucilaginous seeds during many nights with dew
may affect the repair mechanisms of the DNA, cell mem-
branes, and organelles; thereby enhancing seed viabil-
ity for many years (Osborne et al. 1980/1981; Leprince
et al. 1993; Huang et al. 2008). The mucilage has also
been reported to have a stimulatory action on germina-
tion (Gat-Tilman 1995) or it may control the germination
process by excluding the passage of oxygen when there
is excess moisture (Gutterman et al. 1967, 1973; Gutter-
man 1 996; Tamara et al. 2000).
Although several studies have drawn the attention to
the ecological importance of myxospermy in the flora
of Namaqualand (Rosch 1977; Van Rooyen et al. 1990;
Van Rheede van Oudtshoom & Van Rooyen 1999), the
germination behaviour of myxospermic species (Fot-
ouo Makouate 2008) and the response of myxospermic
species to grazing pressure (Fotouo Makouate 2008),
little attention has thus far been given to the origin and
chemical composition of the mucilage of these myxo-
spermic diaspores. The objectives of this study were to
investigate the origin and the chemical composition of
the mucilage of a representative sample of myxospermic
species in Namaqualand, South Africa.
STUDY AREA AND SPECIES
Diaspores of the species investigated in this study
were all collected in the Namaqualand Hardeveld Biore-
gion of the Succulent Karoo (Mucina & Rutherford
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
2006). The Succulent Karoo is an arid winter rainfall
region stretching along the West Coast of South Africa
and Namibia; and is recognized by the IUCN as one of
only two entirely arid global hotspots of biodiversity
(Conservation International 2009). Many of the biologi-
cally unique features of this biome have been attributed
to its climate, i.e. the effective and relatively predict-
able seasonal rainfall, and the relatively moderate win-
ter temperatures (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). A promi-
nent feature of the Namaqualand Hardeveld Bioregion is
the extravagant spring floral display of winter-growing
annuals (Van Rooyen 1999).
Representative species of four families were investi-
gated: within the Lamiaceae, the perennial shrub Salvia
dentata\ within the Acanthaceae, two dwarf peren-
nial shrubs Acanthopsis horrida and Blepharis jure at a\
within the Brassicaceae, the annual Heliophila thunber-
gii var. thunbergii; and within the Asteraceae, the per-
ennial shrubs Pentzia incana and Othonna cylindrica
as well as the annual species Cotida barbata, Monocu-
lus (Tripteris) hyoseroides, Senecio arenarius, Ursinia
cakilefolia, Oncosiphon grandiflorum and Foveolina
dichotoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Dry seeds/achenes were mounted on a stub and made
conductive with Ru04 vapour (Van der Merwe & Pea-
cock 1999). For wet samples, seeds/achenes of each
species were soaked in water for 24 hours before fixa-
tion. Seeds/achenes were then fixed in 2.5% glutaral-
dehyde in 0.075 M phosphate buffer. pH 7.4, for one
hour, and rinsed three times (five minutes per rinse) in
0.075 M phosphate buffer and dehydrated in an ethanol
series with the respective concentrations of 30%, 50%,
70%, 90%, and 100%. This was followed by critical
point drying in liquid CO,, whereafter the seeds/achenes
were mounted on a stub and made conductive with RuO,
vapour. Samples were viewed with the use of a JSM 840
scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, Tokyo,
Japan), and photographs were taken with the computer
program Orion 6.60.4.
Light microscopy
Further studies were done on diaspores where the
origin of the mucilage could not be clearly established
with the aid of an SEM. Dry samples were fixed in 4%
(v/v) formaldehyde in 50% (v/v) ethanol (FAA) to pre-
vent mucilage release. The wet samples were immersed
in water for 24 hours. Wet samples were fixed in 2.5%
glutaraldehyde in 0.075 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for
one hour, and rinsed three times (five minutes per rinse)
in 0.075 M phosphate buffer, and dehydrated in an etha-
nol series with the respective concentrations of 30%,
50%, 70%, 90% and 100%. Samples were subsequently
infiltrated over two days with pure LR- White resin and
polymerized at 65°C for 24 to 36 hours. Sections were
cut with a Reichert Ultracut E microtome. Each sec-
tion was stained, mounted in immersion oil, and viewed
with a Nikon Optiphot light microscope (LM) (Tokyo,
Japan). Photographs were taken with a Nikon Digital
camera DXM 1 200 (Tokyo, Japan) and the computer
program Nikon ACT- 1 (Tokyo, Japan).
Diaspore staining was done according to various
manuals of microscopic staining (McClean & Ivimey
Cook 1941; O’Brien & McCully 1981; Lawton &
Ettridge 1986). Seven different stains were used to test
for the presence of various compounds, the details of
which are given in Table 1 .
TABLE 1 . — Stains used for various compounds and expected results
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A n atomical investigation
On the basis of the anatomical origin of the mucilage,
Zohary (1937) distinguished seven different types. Gru-
bert (1974) recognized many more types, but his three
main categories were based on whether the origin was
1, restricted to epidermal structures, e.g. epidermis or
hairs; 2, from epidermal and sub-epidermal layers; or 3,
restricted to sub-epidermal layers.
Neither the classification systems of Zohary (1937)
or Grubert (1974) accommodate diaspores where the
mucilage production occurs on wings of achenes, as
was reported in the present study. In general, diaspores
of most myxospermic species are smooth-coated and do
not contain obvious appendages to advance telechory.
Contrary to the belief that none of the myxospermic
Asteraceae possess a pappus (Grubert 1974), many
myxospermic species from Namaqualand are winged or
possess a winged pappus. The presence of wings would
allow anemochoric dispersal during phase I dispersal
(Chambers & MacMahon 1994), but further anemo-
choric dispersal would be prevented once the achenes
were moistened and remained attached to soil particles.
The mucilage production of the species investigated
in the present study could best be grouped into three
main types:
1 Epidermal and sub-epidermal cells of seeds and
achenes:
1.1 Cells of seeds bursting only in the centre
1 .2 Cells of achenes bursting across the entire surface
2 Specialized tissue in wings or pappus of achenes
3 Hairs:
3.1 On achenes
3.2 On seeds
Epidermal mucilage
Heliophila thunbergii var. thunbergii (Brassicaceae)
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
9
FIGURE 1. — Heliophila thunbergii var. thunbergii, seeds. A-D, SEM: A, entire dry seed; B, high magnification of dry epidermis; C, high magnifi-
cation of wet seed surface; D, section of wet seed. E, F, LM: E, section of the dry seed; F, cross section of wet epidermis, e, epidermal layer,
m, mucilage.
The scanning electron micrograph of dry seeds of
H. thunbergii var. thunbergii reveals a circular seed
(Figure 1A). The epidermal layer (e) consists of circular
cells with a raised margin and a cavity in the centre (Fig-
ure IB). Upon wetting, the mucilage swells and the epi-
dermal cells become incapable of containing the excess
mucilage and therefore rupture. Once wet, the seed is
covered by a gelatinous film (Figure 1C), similar to the
mucilaginous seed coat of two species of the Brassi-
caceae described by Gutterman & Shem-Tov (1997).
The thin section of the dry seed also reveals the epider-
mal cells filled with mucilage (m) (Figure IE). The sec-
tion of the wet seed reveals the epidermis with ruptured
cells from which filaments of mucilage (m) emerge (Fig-
ure ID, F).
Salvia lanceolata (Lamiaceae)
A similar pattern was observed for the seeds of S. lan-
ceolata (Lamiaceae). Once in contact with water, the
outer layer of the epidermis absorbs water quickly, the
epidermis cells swell, the cuticle ruptures and the con-
tents are excreted as long, continuous threads. Hedge
(1970) reported that the contents of the epidermis cells
of some Lamiaceae are secreted in the shape of long,
continuous, helically coiled threads.
FIGURE 2. — Cotula barbata, achenes. A, B, D, E, SEM: A, entire dry achene; B, high magnification of the epidermis; D, entire wet achene; E, high
magnification of wet epidermis covered with thick layer of mucilage. C, F, LM: C, cross section of dry achene coat, with mucilage (arrow)
retained in epidermal layer; F, cross section of wet epidermis of which outer layer has burst, releasing mucilage from epidermal cells, m,
mucilage.
10
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 3. — Foveolina dichotoma, achenes. A-C, SEM: A, entire achene of F. dichotoma ; B, high magnification of the epidermis of F. dichotoma ;
C, wet achene. Oncosiphon grandiflorum , achenes: D, E, LM: D, thin cross section of dry epidermis; E, thin cross section of wet epidermis
with broken epidermal cells that liberate mucilage, e, epidermal layer, m, mucilage.
Cotula barbata (Asteraceae)
In the dry state, the one side of the achene of C. bar-
bata is undulated (Figure 2A), whereas the other side of
the achene is smooth (Figure 2B). The mucilage struc-
ture observed in C. barbata is similar to that of H. thun-
bergii var. thunbergii with the mucilage contained in the
epidermal layer (Figure 2C). When C. barbata achenes
come into contact with water (Figure 2D), the epidermal
cells burst across the entire outer surface (Figure 2E,
F) and not only the centre of the cell as in the case of
H. thunbergii var. thunbergii.
Foveolina dichotoma. Oncosiphon grandiflorum and
Pentzia incana (Asteraceae)
These three species are taxonomically closely related,
and it appears that they have the same way of producing
mucilage. The SEMs show that the epidermis of the dry
achenes of F. dichotoma consists of parallel longitudinal
cells (Figure 3 A, B), as was also found for O. grandi-
florum and P. incana. Following wetting, fixation, and
critical point drying, the achenes are covered with a
gelatinous film but the pappus remains unchanged (Fig-
ure 3C). Light microscope sections of the dry achene of
O. grandiflorum show that the epidermal cells are filled
FIGURE 4. — Ursinia cakilefolia,
SEM of achenes: A, entire
dry achene with winged pap-
pus; B, high magnification
of dry winged pappus con-
sisting of radially elongated
cells; C, entire wet achene
with uncoiled winged pappus;
D, high magnification of wet
winged pappus showing long
strands of uncoiled mucilage,
wp, winged pappus.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
with mucilage (Figure 3D), which is released when the
cells burst open upon swelling in contact with water
(Figure 3E).
Mucilaginous wings
Ursinia cakilefolia (Asteraceae)
Dry achenes of U. cakilefolia have a winged pappus
(wp) (Figure 4A), consisting of a single layer of radi-
ally elongated cells with helically thickened cell walls
(Figure 4B). When the pappus comes into contact with
water, the cells separate at the middle lamellae and the
helical thickenings uncoil to form long strands of muci-
lage (Figure 4C). The different steps through which the
pappus uncoils are clearly visible under the SEM (Fig-
ure 4D). The same process was observed in U. nana
subsp. nana (Rosch 1977).
Monoculus hyoseroides (Asteraceae)
Achenes of M. hyoseroides are three-winged. The
epidermis of the seed-bearing part of the achene is undu-
late and does not become mucilaginous (Figure 5A). The
section through the wings shows hexagonally shaped
cells completely filled with mucilage and separated by
thick cell walls (Figure 5B). Upon wetting, the cells
separate and the wings become completely mucilagi-
FIGURE 5. — Monoculus hyose-
roides, SEM of achenes: A,
entire dry achene; B, high
magnification of a section of
the wing; C, entire wet achene
with disintegrated wing; D,
high magnification of long
strands of mucilage.
nous (Figure 5C) and the long mucilage strands remain
attached to the achene (Figure 5D).
Mucilaginous hairs
Senecio arenarius (Asteraceae)
In the dry condition, the shiny white hairs (h) have
a finger-like shape and lie against the achene surface
(Figure 6A, B). The interior of the hair seems to be
filled with a coiled thread as seen at high magnification
(Figure 6B). In the wet condition, the hairs spread ± at
right angles to the seed. Apparently, when the mucilagi-
nous hairs absorb water the threads uncoil and become
thin and long (Figure 6C). The same phenomenon was
observed for Othonna cylindrica, as well as for O. flori-
bunda (Rosch 1977).
Acanthopsis horrida and Blepharis furcata (Acan-
thaceae)
In the dry condition, the hairs on the seed surface
of A. horrida (Figure 7 A, B) and B. furcata are tightly
appressed to the seed coat and are covered with a thick
deposit (Figure 1C). At high magnification it can be seen
that these hairs contain coiled spirals (Figure 7B). Once
in contact with water the thick deposit expands, the hairs
become swollen and spread ± at right angles to the seed
FIGURE 6. — Senecio arenarius, SEM of achenes: A, entire dry achene; B, high magnification of dry achene with hair lying against it; C, high
magnification of wet hairs, h, hair.
12
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 7. — Acanthopsis horrida, SEM of seeds: A, entire dry seed; B, hairs; C, dry epidermis covered with thick deposit; D, wet seed; E, swollen
hairs; F, uncoiled strands of mucilage.
coat (Figure 7D). The tips of the hairs break open and
release a multitude of strands of mucilage (Figure 7E,
F).
Chemical composition
Three stains reacted positively with the mucilage of
all species: methylene blue, ruthenium red. and toluidine
blue; thus confirming the presence of polysaccharides
such as cellulose and pectic substances. On the basis
of the intensity of the reaction, the epidermal mucilage
seemed to contain less cellulose than the mucilaginous
wings and mucilaginous hairs. In some species, a slight
reaction was also observed with aniline blue, indicating
the presence of callose in the mucilage.
Cellulose is the most abundant plant polysaccharide
found in the form of microfibrils in cell walls and muci-
lage. Dry amorphous and fibrous cellulose can absorb
considerable amounts of water and becomes soft, flex-
ible, and viscous. Pectin is a heterogeneous grouping
of acidic structural polysaccharides with the main mol-
ecules being the D-galacturonic acid residues. They do
not possess exact structures and are complex. As for
cellulose, pectin is a water binder, is highly viscous,
and can form a firm gel when in contact with water. In
all cases, the mucilage of the diaspores investigated
contained both cellulose and pectic substances. This
could be due to the presence of microfibres of cellulose
embedded in the pectin compounds forming a complex
matrix. Both pectic substances and cellulose were also
reported in the seed mucilage of Arabidopsis thaliana
(Brassicaceae) (Windsor et al. 2000; Willats et al. 2001 ;
Macquet et al. 2007). In a detailed chemical and macro-
molecular study of the composition of A. thaliana seed
mucilage (Brassicaceae), Macquet et al. (2007) found
that the mucilage was made up of two layers: a water-
soluble layer that could be separated from the seed and
an inner layer that remained firmly attached to the seed.
The inner layer was itself constituted of two domains,
the internal one of which contained cellulose. The major
pectin of both the water-soluble and adherent seed muci-
lage was rhamnogalacturonan I.
This study has only provided a rough indication of
the composition of the mucilage of the diaspores investi-
gated. The chemistry of mucilage is complex and needs
a more detailed study to determine the exact type of
polysaccharide-forming mucilage in each diaspore.
CONCLUSIONS
The mucilaginous layer of the diaspores of 12 species
from Namaqualand was investigated anatomically using
both light and scanning electron microscopy. The struc-
tural origin of the mucilage produced by the diaspores
was diverse. Diaspores of myxospermic plant species
might produce mucilage in different ways; but in gen-
eral, this function resides in the epidermal cells and
other external appendages such as hairs and wings. Pre-
vious systems to classify the different types of mucilage
production did not recognize the mucilaginous nature of
wings or pappus. Despite the diversity of the origin and
structure of the mucilage, it performs more-or-less the
same ecological functions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support
received from the German Federal Ministry of Educa-
tion and Research (BMBF) through the BIOTA South
Project and the National Research Foundation under
grant no. 61277.
REFERENCES
BREGMAN, R. & GRAVEN, P. 1997. Subcuticular secretion by cactus
seeds improves germination by means of rapid uptake and distri-
bution of water. Annals of Botany 80: 525-53 1 .
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
13
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL. 2009. http://www.biodiversity-
hotspots.org (accessed 2009).
CHAMBERS, J.J. & MACMAHON, J.A. 1994. A day in the life of a
seed: movements and fates of seeds and implications for natural
and managed systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systemat-
ic* 25: 263-392.
ELLNER, S. & SHMIDA, A. 1981 . Why are adaptations for long-range
seed dispersal rare in desert plants? Oeco/ogia 51 : 133-144.
FOTOUO MAKOUATE, H. 2008. Dispersal strategies in communal
versus privately-owned rangeland in Namaqualand, South Afri-
ca. M.Sc. dissertation. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
GAT-TILMAN, G. 1995. The accelerated germination of Carrichtera
annua seeds and the stimulating and inhibiting effects produced
by the mucilage at supra-optimal temperatures. Journal of Arid
Environments 30: 327-338.
GRUBERT, M. 1974. Studies on the distribution of myxospermy among
seeds and fruits of Angiospennae and its ecological importance.
Acta Biologica Venezuelica 8:31 5-351 .
GUTTERMAN, Y. 1993. Seed germination in desert plants. Springer,
Berlin.
GUTTERMAN, Y. 1996. Some ecological aspects of plant species with
mucilaginous seed coats inhabiting the Negev Desert of Israel.
In Y. Steinberg, ed.. Preservation of our world in the wake of
change 6: 492^196. Jerusalem.
GUTTERMAN, Y. & SHEM-TOV, S. 1997. Mucilaginous seed coat
structure of Carrichtera annua and Anastatica hierochuntica
from the Negev Desert highlands of Israel and its adhesion to the
soil crust. Journal of Arid Environments 35: 695-705.
GUTTERMAN, Y„ WITZTUM, A. & EVENARI, M. 1967. Seed dis-
persal and germination in Blepharis persica (Burnt.) Kuntze.
Israel Journal ofBotanv 16: 213-234.
GUTTERMAN, Y„ WITZTUM A. & HEYDECKER, W. 1973. Studies
of the surfaces of desert plant seeds. II. Ecological adaptations of
the seeds of Blepharis persica. Annals ofBotanv 37: 1051-1055.
HEDGE, I.C. 1970. Observation on the mucilage of Salvia fruits. Notes
from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 30: 79-95.
HUANG, Z„ BOUBRIAK, I., OSBORNE, D.J., DONG, M. & GUT-
TERMAN, Y. 2008. Possible role of pectin-containing mucilage
and dew in repairing embryo DNA of seeds adapted to desert
conditions. Annals of Botany 101: 277-283.
LAWTON, J.R. & ETTRIDGE, S.C. 1986. Cytochemical staining of
lipids in transition electron microscopy. Electron Microscopy
Society of Southern Afi-ica Proceedings 16: 115, 116.
LEPRINCE, 0., HENDRY, G.A.F. & MCKENZIE, B.D. 1993.
Membranes, protection, desiccation and ageing. Seed Science
Research 3: 272-275.
MACQUET, A., RALET, C.-C., KRONENBERGER, J„ MARION-
POLL, A. & NORTH, H.M. 2007. In situ chemical and macro-
molecular study of the composition of Arabidopsis thaliana seed
coat mucilage. Plant Cell Physiology > 48: 984—999.
MCLEAN, W.C. & IVIMEY COOK, W.C. 1941. Plant science formu-
lae. A reference book for plant science laboratories (including
Bacteriology). MacMillan, London.
MUCINA, L. & RUTHERFORD, M.C. (eds). 2006. The vegetation of
South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South Afri-
can National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
MURBECK, S. 1919. Beitrage zur Biologie der Wiistenpflanzen:
Vorkommen und Bedeutung von Schleimabsonderung aus
Samenhullen. Lunds Universitats Arsskrif NF Adv 2, 15: 1-36.
O'BRIEN, T.P. & MCCULLY, M. 1981. The study of plant structure.
Principles and selected methods. Termarcarphi, Melbourne.
OSBORNE, D.J., SHARON, R. & BEN-ISHAI, R. 1980/81. DNA'
integrity and repair. Israel Journal of Botany 29: 259-272.
ROSCH, M.W. 1977. Enkele plantekologiese aspekte van die Hester
Malan-natuurreservaat. M.Sc. dissertation. University of Preto-
ria, Pretoria.
STOPP, K. 1958. Die verbreitungshemmenden Einrichtungen in der
siidafrikanischen Flora. Botanische Studien 8, Jena.
TAMARA, L.W., SKINNER, D.J. & HAUGHN, G.W. 2000. Differ-
entiation of mucilage secretory cells of Arabidopsis seed coat.
Plant Physiology 122: 345-355.
VAN DER MERWE, C.F. & PEACOCK. .1. 1999. Enhancing conduc-
tivity of biological material for the SEM. Microscopy Society of
Southern Africa — Proceedings 29: 44.
VAN RHEEDE VAN OUDTSHOORN, K. & VAN ROOYEN, M.W.
1999. Dispersal biology of desert plants. Springer, Berlin.
VAN ROOYEN, M.W., THERON, G.K. & GROBBELAAR, N. 1990.
Life form and dispersal spectra of the flora of Namaqualand,
South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 19: 133-145.
VAN ROOYEN, M.W. 1999. Functional aspects of short-lived plants.
In R.W.J. Dean & S.J. Milton (eds). The Karoo: ecological pat-
terns and processes : pp. 107-122. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
WINDSOR, J.B., SYMONDS, V.V., MENDENHALL, J. & LLOYD.
A.M. 2000. Arabidopsis seed coat development: morphologi-
cal differentiation of the outer integument. Plant Journal 22:
483^193.
WILLATS, W.G.T., MCCARTNEY, L. & KNOX, J.P 2001. In situ
analysis of pectic polysaccharides in seed mucilage and at the
root surface of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 213: 37 — 44.
ZAADY, E., GUTTERMAN, Y. & BOEKEN, B. 1997. The germination
of mucilaginous seeds of Plantago coronopus. Reboudia pinna-
ta. and Carrichtera annua on cyanobacterial soil crust from the
Negev. Plant and Soil 190: 247-252.
ZOHARY, M. 1937. Die verbreitungsokologischen Verhaltnisse der
Pflanzen Palastinas. Die antitelechoristischen Erscheinungen.
Beihefte Botanisches Centralblatt A 56: 1-155.
Bothalia 42,1 : 15-20(2012)
Recircumscription and distribution of elements of the 6 Ceterach
cordatum ’ complex ( Asplenium : Aspleniaceae) in southern Africa
R.R. KLOPPER* and N.R. CROUCH**
Keywords: Aspleniaceae, Asplenium , Ceterach , ferns, pteridophytes, southern Africa, xerophytes
ABSTRACT
Ceterachoid aspleniums in southern Africa have long been treated as a single widespread and variable taxon, Asplenium
cordatum (Thunb.) Sw. (= Ceterach cordatum Thunb.). In addition to A. cordatum, a further two ceterachoid taxa are now rec-
ognized as occurring in the Flora of southern Africa (FSA) region, namely A. capense (Kunze) Bir, Fraser-Jenk. & Lovis and
A. phillipsianum (Kummerle) Bir, Fraser-Jenk. & Lovis. We provide full descriptions and distributions of these three taxa.
INTRODUCTION
Pteridophyte treatments for the Flora of southern
Africa (FSA) (Roux 1986; Schelpe & Anthony 1986;
Burrows 1990) and Flora zambesiaca (FZ) (Schelpe
1970) regions, have considered a single xerophytic
rock fern, Ceterach cordatum Thunb., to occur widely
throughout the region and to show great morphological
variability. Ceterach is currently treated as a subgenus of
Asplenium L. (Crabbe et al. 1975; Bir et al. 1985; Roux
2001). Subgenus Ceterach is distinguished from subge-
nus Asplenium in our region by its lack of indusia and
the presence of densely-set scales (paleae) on the abax-
ial lamina surface, versus indusiate sori and sparsely-
set scales in subgenus Asplenium (Roux 2001). Moore
(1857) early recognized that the strictly African cete-
rachoid species were anatomically and morphologically
distinct from the Eurasian-Macronesian elements, and
therefore excluded them from Asplenium subgen. Ceter-
ach. More recent molecular analyses have demonstrated
the polyphyly of subgenus Ceterach , implicating homo-
plasy in the dense scale cover and in pinnatisect lami-
nae of these asplenioid ferns (Pinter et al. 2002; Van den
Heede et al. 2003). The taxonomic implications are that
southern African taxa referred earlier to subgenus Cete-
rach should either be accommodated in a new subge-
nus, or that distinction at a subgeneric level ( sensu Roux
2001) should be abandoned altogether (Van den Heede
et al. 2003).
The multiple origins in Asplenium of redundant
indusia and dense abaxial scales have been attributed
to independent adaptation to rocky xeroseres across its
range (Van den Heede et al. 2003). We further postulate
that the pinnatisect fronds common to both groups is a
poikilohydric modification that allows for frond integ-
rity to be maintained in the inrolled, dessicated state
(Figure 1), and for even restoration following rehydra-
tion. Ceterachoid taxa in southern Africa are extremely
* Biosystematics Research and Biodiversity Collections Division,
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , 0001
Pretoria / Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, 0002
Pretoria. E-mail: r.klopper@sanbi.org.za.
** Ethnobotany Unit, South African National Biodiversity Insti-
tute, P.O. Box 52099, Berea Road, 4007 Durban / School
of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 4041 Durban.
E-mail: n.crouch@sanbi.org.za.
MS. received: 2010-05-20.
desiccation-tolerant; a member of this group has been
shown by Gaff (1977) to tolerate relative humidities in
the 0-5% range for at least six months, with an initial
water potential (\p) of 18%, expressed in terms of the rel-
ative humidity at 28°C.
We concur with Roux (2009a) in his reinstatement of
Asplenium capense (Kunze) Bir, Fraser-Jenk. & Lovis
as distinct from A. cordatum (Thunb. ) Sw., but we also
identify A. phillipsianum (Kummerle) Bir, Fraser-Jenk.
& Lovis as occurring in the FSA region (Table 1 ). This
taxon extends from the island of Socotra off Soma-
lia through East and Central Africa to the northern
provinces of South Africa, as far south as the northern
regions of Mpumalanga, Gauteng, and North West Prov-
ince. Pappe & Rawson (1858) recognized the wide-
spread European and North African taxon Asplenium
ceterach L. (= Ceterach officinarum Lam. & DC) as
South African, based on a Krebs collection made on the
Baviaans River. This species is not currently considered
to occur south of the Sahara, and has been taken as a
misidentification (Roux 1986, 2009a).
We provide the recircumscription and distribution of
the three ceterachoid elements of Asplenium currently
known from southern Africa.
FIGURE 1 . — Inrolled pinnatisect leaves of a desiccated plant of Asple-
nium cordatum , Nieu Bethesda, Eastern Cape Province. Photo:
N. Crouch.
16
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
TABLE 1 . — Characters distinguishing ceterachoid members of Asplenium occurring in the FSA region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All ceterachoid Asplenium material held in the fol-
lowing herbaria (totalling almost 600 specimens) were
studied: Geo-Potts Herbarium (BLFU), University
of the Free State, Bloemfontein; Buffelskloof Nature
Reserve Herbarium (BNRH), Lydenburg; Bolus Her-
barium (BOL), University of Cape Town, Cape Town;
Selmar Schonland Herbarium (GRA), Albany Museum,
Grahamstown; the Herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gar-
dens, Kew (K), London, United Kingdom; Mpumalanga
Parks Board Herbarium (LYD), Lydenburg; Compton
Herbarium (NBG), SANBI, Cape Town; KwaZulu-Natal
Herbarium (NH), SANBI, Durban; National Museum
Herbarium (NMB), Bloemfontein; Bews Herbarium
(NU), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg;
National Herbarium (PRE), SANBI, Pretoria; H.G.W.J.
Schweickerdt Herbarium (PRU), University of Preto-
ria, Pretoria; A.P Goossens Herbarium (PUC), North
West University, Potchefstroom; and the South African
Museum Herbarium (SAM), SANBI, Cape Town.
The JSTOR Plant Science website (http://plants.jstor.
org) was consulted for type material held in other her-
baria. Images of type specimens were directly obtained
from The Museum of Evolution Herbarium (UPS), Upp-
sala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Types seen electroni-
cally are cited as e!
Herbarium acronyms follow Holmgren el ah (1990).
Author citations used follow the standardized author
abbreviations provided by the International Plant Names
Index (http://www.ipni.org).
TAXONOMY
Three taxa are recognized in southern Africa, all chas-
mophytic saxicoles (Jacobsen 1983):
Key to the species
la. Fronds always pinnate, with stronger, rigid rachis; pinnae
free from rachis (petiolulate), with flared to somewhat
auriculate/cordate base, abaxially very densely covered
with overlapping, broadly debate scales; sori small, dis-
crete 1 . A. cordatum
lb. Fronds pinnatisect to pinnate, with weaker, flexible rachis;
pinnae adnate to rachis, with broader decurrent base (at
least in distal half of frond), abaxially sparsely covered
with ovate lanceolate scales; sori large and confluent:
2a. Pinnae adnate to rachis and decurrent apically, becoming free
from rachis (petiolulate) with ± flared to auriculate/cordate
base basiscopically; rachis winged apically 2. A. capense
2b. Pinnae adnate to rachis and decurrent throughout; rachis
almost winged throughout 3. A. phillipsianum
1. Asplenium cordatum (Thunb.) Sw. in Journal
fur die Botanik 1800,2: 54 (1801). Acrostichum corda-
tum Thunb.: 171 (1800). Grammitis cordata (Thunb.)
Sw.: 23, 217 (1806). Cincinalis cordata (Thunb.) Desv.
(1811). Notholaena cordata (Thunb.) Desv.: 92 (1813).
Gymnogramma cordata (Thunb.) Schltdl.: 16 (1825).
Ceterach cordatum (Thunb.) Desv.: 223 (1827). Type:
South Africa, ‘e Cap bonae Spei’, Thunberg s.n. (UPS-
Thunb 24439, holo. el).
Ceterach crenata Kaulf.: 85, 86 (1824), nom. ille-
git. superfl. Type: as for Acrostichum cordatum Thunb.
[McNeill et al. (2006) Art. 7.5].
Gymnogramma namaquensis Pappe & Rawson:
42 (1858). Gymnogramma cordata var. namaquensis
(Pappe & Rawson) Sim: 212 ( 1892). Ceterach cordatum
var. namaquensis (Pappe & Rawson) Sim: 176 (1915).
Type: South Africa, Namaqualand, between rocks near
Modderfontein, 1856, Whitehead s.n. (K, holo.!).
Grammitis cordata [var. and] subvar. nudiuscula
Hook.: t.7 (1860), nom. illegit. superfl. Type: as for
Gymnogramma namaquensis Pappe & Rawson [see
Roux (2009a)].
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
17
Grammitis cordata var. pinnato-pinnatifida Hook.: t.7
(1860), nom. inval. [McNeill et al. (2006) Art. 26.2],
Gymnogramma cordata var. subbipinnata Hook.: t.7
(1860). Ceterach cordatum var. subbipinnata (Hook.)
Kiimmerle: 289 (1909). Type: South Africa, ‘elevated
mountain of Macaliesberg’, Ecklon & Burke s.n. [miss-
ing, see Schelpe & Anthony (1986: 206) and Roux
(2009:83)].
Gymnogramma cordata var. bipinnata Sim: 212
(1892). Type: South Africa, Namaqualand, without pre-
cise locality, Holland s.n. [NBG, lecto.!, designated by
Schelpe & Anthony (1986: 206)].
Notholaena inaequalis Kunze y eckloniana (Kunze)
Kuntze var. rawsonii (Pappe) Kuntze forma minor
Kuntze: 379 (1898). Type: South Africa, [Eastern Cape],
‘Capland’, Cradock, 940 m, 12 Feb. 1894, Kuntze s.n.
[NY, lecto., designated by Roux (2009b: 228)].
Rhizome to 3-6 mm diam., erect or procumbent;
scales sessile, clathrate, very narrowly lanceolate, 2-3
x 0. 5-0.6 mm, acuminate, frequently with a hair point,
irregularly serrate, bicolorous, chestnut-brown distally,
brown proximally, with paler margin throughout, with
narrowly oblong to ovate cells. Fronds tufted, suberect
to erect; stipe ( 1 0—) 1 7 — 40( — 60 ) mm long, dark chest-
nut-brown, densely scaled when young, becoming sub-
glabrous with age, scales sessile, lanceolate, 3. 0-3. 5
x 0.7-0. 9 mm, acuminate, irregularly serrate, glossy,
sometimes bicolorous, chestnut-brown, sometimes with
narrow paler margin, with oblong to ovate cells; lamina
subcoriaceous, involute and inrolled when dry, elliptic
or narrowly elliptic to oblanceolate in outline, shallowly
to very deeply 2-pinnatifid, sometimes 2-pinnate, (20—
)50— 1 20(— 1 50) x ( 10—) 1 5— 40(— 50) mm, basal pinnae
gradually decrescent; rachis not winged between pinnae,
scales as for stipe but lanceolate, 3.0 x 0.9 mm; pinnae
(4 — )6— 1 9(— 3 0 ) x (2— )3— 7(— 1 3 ) mm, free from rachis
(petiolulate), with flared to ± auriculate-cordate base,
narrowly oblong to oblong-lanceolate, bluntly acute,
margin irregularly scalloped to incised, glabrous above
at maturity, abaxially very densely scaled, scales sessile,
debate, ± 2.0 x | .5 mm, attenuate, serrate, glossy, light
reddish brown, with short roundish to oval cells; sori
linear along (obscure) veins, up to 2 mm long, exindusi-
ate, almost totally obscured by scales. Figure 2A-D.
Etymology : cordatum = heart-shaped, referring to the
basally lobed pinnae.
Distribution and ecology: Asplenium cordatum
is widespread in South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland,
Namibia, Botswana, and Zimbabwe (Figure 3); also in
Angola, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia.
It occurs in rocky crevasses in exposed, hot, and dry
habitats, often at the base of boulders, well away from
water. A dense scale cover on the abaxial surface of the
fronds serves to protect the sori of this xerophytic spe-
cies.
Asplenium cordatum is very variable in size, with the
largest specimens originating from the dry areas of the
north-western parts of the Western and Northern Cape
provinces. This immense variability is reflected in the
long list of synonyms for this taxon. Burrows (1990)
noted that northwards of the Limpopo River it becomes
progressively rarer, reaching the extreme of its range in
Ethiopia.
Although purported to occur in Madagascar (Roux
2009a), where a ceterachoid element has been reported
from a single locality on Mount Morahahiva (Tardieu-
Blot 1957), this collection best matches Asplenium phil- ■
lipsianum (Tardieu-Blot 1958: Fig. XVII).
Vouchers: H.H. Burrows 3294 (GRA); E. Esterhuysen
25624 (BOL); D. Galpin 4782a (BLFU); H.H. W. Pear-
son 8557 (BOL, K, NBG); L.E. Taylor 2913 (NBG).
2. Asplenium capense (Kunze) Bir, Fraser-Jenk.
& Lovis in Fern Gazette 13,1: 61 (1985). Ceterach ca-
pense Kunze: 496 (1836). Grammitis capensis (Kunze)
T.Moore: Ixiii (1857). Type: South Africa, ‘Port Natal et
Afrique meridionalea’, Drege s.n. [G, lecto.!, isolecto.,
designated by Roux (1986: 352)]; ‘Ceded territory,
bergwaldungen an den Quellen des Katriver, Oberhalb
Philipstown’, Ecklon & Zeyher s.n. (UPS, syn. e!).
Gymnogramma capensis Spreng. ex Kaulf.: 183
(1831), nom. nud. Ceterach cordatum var. capense
(Spreng. ex Kaulf.) Hieron. ex Kiimmerle: 287 (1909).
Type: South Africa, ‘Cap. Bon spei: in einer Felsenritze
am Lowenberg’, Zeyher s.n. FI. Cap. No. 273 (HAL,
holo. e!; BOL, iso.!).
Grammitis cordata var. pinnata Hook.: t.7 (1860),
Type: as for Ceterach capense Kunze [see Roux
(2009a)].
Rhizome to 4 mm diam., erect or procumbent; scales
sessile, clathrate, lanceolate, 3-5 x (.0-1.5 mm, acu-
minate, frequently with a hair point, irregularly serrate,
bicolorous, with dark brown central region and paler
margins, with narrowly oblong cells. Fronds tufted,
erect to suberect; stipe 1 5— 35(— 60) mm long, chestnut-
brown to dark chestnut-brown, densely scaled, scales
sessile, narrowly triangular, 3-5 x 0.5-1 .0 mm, acu-
minate, irregularly finely serrate, glossy, sometimes
bicolorous, with narrow rust coloured central region
and broad straw coloured margin, with oblong to ovate
cells; lamina herbaceous, involute and inrolled when
dry, elliptic to narrowly obovate in outline, pinnatisect
to pinnate, sometimes shallowly 2-pinnatifid, (80 — )90 —
1 20(— 1 90) x (20-)30-45(-52) mm, basal pinnae gradu-
ally decrescent; rachis somewhat winged apically, not
winged between widely spaced pinnae basally, scales
as for stipe but 2-4 x 0. 7-1.0 mm; pinnae ( 1 0—) 1 5—
25(— 28) x (4— )5— 1 0(— 1 1 ) mm, adnate to rachis with
decurrent base apically, becoming free from rachis
(petiolulate) with somewhat flared to auriculate-cordate
base basiscopically, ovate-oblong, obtuse, margin sinu-
ate to scalloped, glabrous above at maturity, abaxially
very sparsely scaled, scales sessile, deflate to lanceo-
late, 1.5-2. 5 x 0.4-0. 7 mm, attenuate, finely serrate,
glossy, bicolorous, with narrow rust coloured central
region and broad straw coloured margin, with narrowly
oblong cells; sori linear along (obscure) veins, 3-6 mm
long, becoming confluent at maturity, exindusiate, not
obscured by scales. Figure 2E-H.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 2. — A-D, Asplenium cordatum, J.E. Burrows 1110 (BNRH): A, complete frond; B, cordate pinna base; C, abaxial surface of pinna with
dense scales; D, lamina scale. E-H, Asplenium capense, H.H. Burrows 2891 (BNRH): E, complete frond; F, pinna base; G, abaxial surface
of pinna with sparse scales; H, lamina scale. I -M, Asplenium phillipsianum, J.E. Burrows & S. M. Burrows s.n. (BN RH ): 1, complete frond;
J, adnate pinna base; K, abaxial surface of pinna with sparse scales; L, lamina scale; M, gemmae at frond apex. Scale bar: A, E, I, 20 mm;
B, C, F, G, J, K, M, 5 mm; D, H, L, 1 mm. Artist: Sandra Burrows.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
19
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of Asplenium cordatum in the FSA region.
Etymology : capense = pertaining to the Cape.
Distribution and ecology. Asplenium capense occurs
from the Cape Peninsula through the Western and East-
ern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, the Free State and northern
provinces of South Africa (Figure 4), extending sporadi-
cally to central and tropical East Africa.
This species typically grows in sandy soil on forest
floors, as well as under coastal dune scrub, often fairly
close to streams and under trees on steep damp earth
banks. It is usually associated with riparian or open for-
est, most often in lightly rather than deeply shaded con-
ditions.
Vouchers: Th.C.E. Fries, T. Norlich & H. Weimark
30-8 (BOF, K); D.B. Miiller 890 (NMB; PRE); R. Sch-
lechter 2703 (GRA, K); E.M. van Zinderen Bakker 1135
(BFFU, PRE); C.J. Ward 12400 (NH, NU, PRE).
3. Asplenium phillipsianum (Kiimmerle) Bir, Fra-
ser-Jenk. & Lovis in Fern Gazette 13,1: 62 (1985).
FIGURE 4. — Distribution of Asplenium capense in the FSA region.
FIGURE 5. — Distribution of Asplenium phillipsianum in the FSA
region.
Ceterach phillipsianum Kiimmerle: 287 (1909). Type:
Somalia, ‘Ferns from deep shade Wagga Mountain, anno
1897’, Phillips s.n. (BM, holo.; K, iso.!)
Rhizome to 4 mm diam., erect or procumbent; scales
sessile, clathrate, lanceolate, 3-4 x 0. 6-1.0 mm, acu-
minate, frequently with a hair point, irregularly serrate,
sometimes bicolorous, with dark chestnut-brown central
region, sometimes with darker apex, with paler margins
throughout, with narrowly oblong to ovate cells. Fronds
tufted, suberect to spreading; stipe 5— 20(— 30) mm long,
dark chestnut-brown, densely scaled, scales sessile, lan-
ceolate, 3-4 x 0. 7-1.0 mm, acuminate, irregularly ser-
rate, glossy, bicolorous, distally dark brown and proxi-
mally chestnut-brown with paler margins throughout,
with narrowly oblong to ovate cells; lamina herbaceous,
involute and inrolled when dry, elliptic to obovate
in outline, pinnatisect to very shallowly 2-pinnatifid,
(5— )70— 1 00(— 130) x ( 1 6— )24— 33(— 50) mm, lower pinnae
gradually decrescent, occasionally produces 1-3 gem-
mae situated adaxially in the sinus of the distal pinnules;
rachis almost winged throughout, scales as for stipe
but 2. 5-3.0 x 0. 6-1.0 mm, concolorous reddish brown,
sometimes chestnut-brown towards apex; pinnae ( 6— ) 1 0—
20(-25) x (3-)4-6(-9) mm, adnate to rachis with decur-
rent base throughout, narrowly ovate-oblong, obtuse,
margin entire to weakly sinuate, glabrous above at matu-
rity, abaxially sparsely scaled, scales sessile, lanceolate,
1. 7-2.4 x 0.6-0. 8 mm, attenuate, finely serrate, glossy,
brown, with oblong cells; sori linear along (obscure)
veins, 2-3 mm long, becoming confluent at maturity,
exindusiate, not totally obscured by scales. Figure 2I-M.
Etymology r. phillipsianum = commemorates the Eng-
lish explorer Ethelbert Fort-Phillips ( 1 857-1944) who in
1897 collected the type specimen in Somalia.
Distribution and ecology >: Asplenium phillipsianum
occurs from the northern provinces of South Africa
(Limpopo, North West, Gauteng, and Mpumalanga)
(Figure 5), through central and tropical Africa as far
north as Socotra; also known from Reunion and Mada-
gascar.
20
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
This species is typically found close to streams,
shaded under trees on steep damp earth banks.
Of the three regional ceterachoid species, A. phillip-
sianum is the only member noted to be gemmiferous (J.
Nel, pers. comm.) (Figure 2M).
Vouchers: J.E. Burrows & S.M. Burrows s.n.
(BNRH); M.F. Glen PRE62127 (PRE); E. Relief & S.E.
Strauss 2154 (PRE); J.P. Roux 3195 (NBG); A. Winter-
boer s.n. (PRU).
Excluded name
Ceterach cordatum var. pinnatifida Sim: 177 (1915).
The syntypes cited by Sim (1915) include representa-
tives of both A. capense and A. phillipsianum.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dr Hugh Glen, KwaZulu-Natal Herbarium, SANBI,
Durban, is thanked for translating Latin texts and for
providing nomenclatural advice; Prof. John McNeill,
Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh, for providing
nomenclatural advice; Ms Hester Steyn, National Her-
barium, SANBI, Pretoria, for producing updated dis-
tribution maps. The Curators of BLFU, BNRH, BOL,
GRA, K, LYD, NBG, NH, NMB, NU, PRE, PRU, PUC
and SAM kindly facilitated access to their collections.
REFERENCES
B1R, S.S., FRASER-JENK1NS, C.R. & LOVIS, J.D. 1985. Asplenium
punjabense sp. nov. and its significance for the status of Ceter-
ach and Ceterachopsis. Fern Gazette 13,1: 53-63.
BURROWS, J.E. 1990. Southern African ferns and fern allies. Frand-
sen, Sandton.
CRABBE, J.A., JERMY, A.C. & MICKEL, J.M. 1975. A new generic
sequence for the pteridophyte herbarium. Fern Gazette 1 1 : 141—
162.
DESVAUX, N.A. 1811. Observations sur quelques nouveaux genres de
fougeres et sur plusieures especes nouvelles de la meme famille.
Magazin fur die neuesten Entdeckungen in der gesammten
Naturkunde, Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin
5: 297-330, figs 4-7.
DESVAUX, N.A. 1813. Especes de fougeres a ajouter au genre Not-
holaena. Journal de Botanique, Appliquee a F Agriculture, d la
Pharmacie, a la Medicine et aux Arts 1 : 91-93.
DESVAUX, N.A. 1827. Prodrome de la families des fougeres. Memoi-
res de la Societe Linneenne de Paris 6(2): 171-337.
GAFF, D.F. 1977. Desiccation tolerant plants of southern Africa. Oeco-
logia 31: 95-109.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part 1 : The herbaria of the world, edn 8.
New York Botanical Garden. New York.
HOOKER, W.J. 1860. A second century of ferns'. [i]-xii, 1. 1-100, Pam-
plin, London.
JACOBSEN, W.B.G. 1983. The ferns and fern allies of southern Africa.
Butterworths, Durban.
KAULFUSS, G.F. 1824. Enumeratio filicunr. [i]— vi, [ 1 ]— 300, pis 1,2.
Cnobloch, Leipzig.
KAULFUSS, G.F. 1831. Lycopodiaceae et Filices in plantae Eckloni-
anae. Linnaea 6: 181-187.
KUMMERLE, J.B. 1909. A Ceterach genusz uj faja. (Species nova
generis Ceterach). Botanikai Kozlemenyek 8: 286-290.
KUNTZE, O. 1898. Revisio genera plantarum, volume III, parts II, II.
Felix, Leipzig.
KUNZE, G. 1836. Plantarum acotyledonearum Africae australis recen-
cio nova. Linnaea 10: 480-570.
MCNEILL, .1., BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J„ SILVA, P.C., SKOG, J.E., WIERSEMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. (eds) 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth Inter-
national Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum
Vegetabile 146: 1-568.
MOORE, T. 1857. Index filicum: a synopsis, with characters of the gen-
era, and an enumeration of the species of ferns. W. Pamplin,
London.
PAPPE, C.W.L. & RAWSON, R.W. 1858. Synopsis filicum Africae aus-
tralis. Saul Solomon and Co., Cape Town.
PINTER, I., BAKKER, F„ BARRETT, J., COX, C., GIBBY, M„
HENDERSON, S„ MORGAN-RICH ARDS, M„ RUMSEY, F„
RUSSELL, S„ TREWICK, S„ SCHNEIDER, H. & VOGEL, J.
2002. Phylogenetic and biosystematic relationships in four high-
ly disjunct polyploidy complexes in the subgenera Ceterach and
Phyllitis in Asplenium (Aspleniaceae). Organisms Diversity &
Evolution 2: 299-3 1 1 .
ROUX, J.P. 1986. A review and typification of some of Kunze’s newly
described South African Pteridophyta published in his Acotyle-
dearum Africae Australioris Recensio Nova. Botanical Journal
of the Linnean Society 92: 343-38 1 .
ROUX, J.P. 2001. Conspectus of southern African Pteridophyta. South-
ern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 13. SAB-
ON ET, Pretoria.
ROUX, J.P. 2009a. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta
of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23.
South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
ROUX, J.P. 2009b. Pteridophyta: Otto Kuntze’s iycopod and fern col-
lections from South Africa. Bothalia 39: 227-229.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. & ANTHONY, N.C. 1986. Pteridophyta. In
O.A. Leistner, Flora of southern Africa. Botanical Research
Institute, Pretoria.
SCHELPE, E.A.C.L.E. 1970. Pteridophyta. In A.W. Exell & E. Launert,
Flora zambesiaca. Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and
Administrations, London.
SCHLECHTENDAL, D.F.L. 1825. Adumbrationes plantarum] : [1]-
16, pis 1-6. Berlin.
SIM, T.R. 1 892. The ferns of South Africa, edn 1 . Juta, Cape Town.
SIM, T.R. 1915. The ferns of South Africa, edn 2. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
SWARTZ, O. 1801. Journal fur die Botanik. Herausgegeben von
medicinalrath schraber. 1800. 1-487, t.i-vii. Gottingen, Hein-
rich Dieterich.
SWARTZ, O. 1806. Synopsis filicum, [i]— xviii, [1]— 445, 1. 1—5. Kiel.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M.-L. 1957. The genus Ceterach in Madagascar.
American Fern Journal 47: 1 08-109.
TARDIEU-BLOT, M.-L. 1958. 5e Famille-Polypodiacees (sensu lato)
5(1) Dennstaedtiacees-(IO) Aspidiacees). In H. Humbert, Flore
de Madagascar et des Comores (Plantes Vasculaires) 1 : 1 8 1 , fig.
XVII, 10-12.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1800. Prodromus plantarum capensium : [i-viii],
[85J-191, Uppsala.
VAN DEN HEEDE, C.J., VIANE, R.L.L. & CHASE, M.W. 2003.
Phylogenetic analysis of Asplenium subgenus Ceterach (Pteri-
dophyta: Aspleniaceae) based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal
ITS DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 90: 48 1 — 495.
Bothalia 42,1: 21—41 (2012)
A revision of Tecophilaeaceae subfam. Tecophilaeoideae in Africa
J.C. MANNING* and P. GOLDBLATT**
Keywords: Africa, Cyanella Royen ex L., Eremiolirion J.C. Manning & F.Forest, new species, systematics, Tecophilaeaceae, Walleria J.Kirk
ABSTRACT
Family Tecophilaeaceae subfam. Tecophilaeoideae is revised for the Flora of southern Africa region, with the inclu-
sion of the tropical Walleria mackenzii J.Kirk for completeness. The genera Cyanella Royen ex L. (9 spp.), Eremiolirion
J.C. Manning & F.Forest (1 sp.) and Walleria J.Kirk (3 spp.) are treated, with keys to the genera, species and subspecies; and
full descriptions and distribution maps. A formal infrageneric classification is proposed for Cyanella , in which sect. Trigella
(Salisb.) Pax & K.Hoffm. is revived for the species with a 3 + 3 arrangement of stamens. The new species, C. marlothii
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, is described from the Richtersveld; and C. pentheri Zahlbr. is resuscitated from the synonomy
of C. hyacinthioides Royen ex L. Pink-flowered plants of normally yellow-flowered C. lutea have a separate geographical
distribution and are recognized as subsp. rosea (Eckl. ex Baker) J.C. Manning & Goldblatt.
INTRODUCTION
Tecophilaeaceae is a small family of seven or eight
genera and ± 25 species from California, Chile, and
southern and tropical mainland Africa (Simpson &
Rudall 1998). The reported occurrence of the fam-
ily in Madagascar (Simpson & Rudall 1998) is based
on Walleria paniculata Fritsch, a synonym of Dianella
ensifolia (L.) DC. (Hemerocallidaceae). The family
is best represented in Africa, where almost two thirds
of the species are found. Cyanastrum Oliv. (3 spp.)
and Kabuyea Brummitt (1 sp.) are strictly tropical, but
Walleria J.Kirk (3 spp.), Eremiolirion J.C. Manning
& F.Forest (1 sp.), and Cyanella Royen ex L. (9 spp.),
are primarily distributed in subtropical and temper-
ate southern Africa. Members of the family are peren-
nial herbs with a cormous, usually tunicated rootstock,
basal (rarely cauline) leaves, and long-lasting flowers,
typically in racemose or paniculate, cymose inflores-
cences; but sometimes solitary and axillary. The flowers
are actinomorphic or zygomorphic, with 3 + 3 petaloid
tepals fused into a short tube adnate to the ovary, and
six stamens, all fertile or some reduced to staminodes,
with ± porose dehiscence. The ovary is inferior or semi-
inferior and 3-carpellate, and matures into a loculicidal
capsule (Simpson & Rudall 1998; Heywood et al. 2007).
The two tropical African genera, Cynastrum and
Kabuyea , have been the subject of a detailed review
(Brummitt et al. 1998), in which they were segregated
as subfam. Cynastroideae, with the remaining genera of
the family retained in subfam. Tecophilaeoideae. The
taxonomy of the southern African species is relatively
well understood, and both Cyanella and Walleria were
revised fairly recently (Carter 1962; Scott 1991; Cowley
& Brummitt 2001), including historical and morpho-
logical details. Since then, however, the genus Eremio-
lirion has been established to accommodate Cyanella
amboensis Schinz, which was excluded from Cyanella
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2011-02-01.
by Scott (1991), but unplaced. We have also published
additional observations on the distribution and morphol-
ogy of Walleria gracilis (Salisb.) S. Carter (Manning et
al. 2001). It is now clear that there is more variation in
some species of Cyanella than was recognized by Scott
(1991), and three subspecies have since been described
in C. alba L.f. (Manning et al. 2005). Field study and
examination of herbarium material of C. hyacinthoides
Royen ex L. suggest that this species is currently too
broadly circumscribed, and that C. pentheri Zahlbr.
should be resuscitated from synonymy. In addition, the
clear geographical segregation between the typical yel-
low-flowered and the pink-flowered forms of C. lutea
L.f. is appropriately reflected by the recognition of dis-
tinct subspecies for them. A collection from the Rich-
tersveld, until now identified as C. orchidiformis Jacq.,
differs from that species and from all others in the genus
in having all six filaments connate into a staminal tube.
It evidently represents an unnamed species that we
describe here.
Currently, therefore, there is no comprehensive treat-
ment for the family in southern Africa and the available
treatment of Cyanella is inadequate and incomplete in
some respects. We provide here a complete review of the
genera and species occurring in the Flora of southern
Africa region, including also the tropical African Walle-
ria mackenzii J.Kirk for completeness. We also propose
a new infrageneric classification for Cyanella that asso-
ciates morphologically similar species in two sections,
with the larger of the two, sect. Cyanella , subdivided
into two series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Type specimens or digital images of types from the
relevant herbaria were examined for all names, as well
as all available herbarium specimens in BOL, NBG,
PRE, and SAM (herbarium acronyms after Holmgren
et al. 1990). Particular use was made of high-resolution
digital images on the Aluka website (www.aluka.org),
and of the Herbarium of the Linnean Society of London
(www.linnean-online.org).
22
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
TAXONOMY
Key to genera
la Corm not tunicated; leaves cauline; flowers solitary in leaf
axils; seeds verrucose or papillate, with tufts of trichomes,
brown Walleria
lb Corm with fibrous tunics; leaves basal; flowers in racemose
or paniculate cymes; seeds rugose, glabrous, black:
2a Foliage leaves 2; inflorescence a divaricate panicle; pedi-
cels without a bracteole; flowers actinomorphic; stamens
monomorphic, central, and symmetrical Eremiolirion
2b Foliage leaves 3-12; inflorescence a raceme, usually
branched, rarely condensed and flowers apparently soli-
tary; pedicels bracteolate; flowers zygomorphic; stamens
dimorphic, in two groups of 3 + 3 or 5 + 1 Cyanella
Walleria J.Kirk in Transactions of the Linnean Soci-
ety 24: 497 (1864). Type species: Walleria nutans J.Kirk
[lecto., designated by E.P.Phillips: 207 (1951)].
Androsyne Salisb: 61 ( 1866). Type species: A. gracilis
Salisb. = Walleria gracilis (Salisb.) S. Carter.
Deciduous geophytes with deep-seated, non-tuni-
cated corm; subterranean portion of stem developing
paired adventitious roots at each node, aerial portion of
stem erect or straggling, smooth, scabrid or armed with
recurved prickles. Cataphylls numerous, scattered along
subterranean portion of stem, small, tubular, membra-
nous. Foliage leaves numerous, all cauline, alternate,
sessile or amplexicaul, linear to ovate, acute or cir-
rhose and tendrilliferous, midrib sometimes armed with
recurved prickles beneath. Inflorescence of solitary, axil-
lary flowers, or rarely bracteole subtending a second
flower; pedicels erect or cernuous, smooth or prickly,
with solitary bracteole inserted ± midway. Flowers
actinomorphic, erect or nodding, rotate, white to blue;
tepals connate below into short tube, ± similar. Stamens
6, monomorphic, erect-symmetrical, inserted at mouth
of tube; filaments short; anthers basifixed, erect, free,
or connivent around style, narrowly lanceolate, dehisc-
ing by apical pores, outer surface scabridulous in basal
± 1/2. Ovary ± superior, with several ovules per locule;
style terete, erect, filiform. Capsules ovoid to subglo-
bose. Seeds ovoid, brown, surface warty or produced
into finger-like papillae, each with apical tuft of minute
trichomes. Basic chromosome number', x = 12 (Goldblatt
& Manning 1989).
3 spp., southern and southern tropical Africa.
Etymology', the genus is named for Horace Waller,
who made the first collections of both tropical African
species during an expedition to central Africa in 1863.
Ethnobotany. the corms comprise part of the tradi-
tional diet of the San, Tswana, and other indigenous
tribes ( e.g . Leffers 2008; also Lugard 289, Maguire
2194, Snyman & Noailles 231, Story 6117).
Key to species
la Flowers erect, tepals 13-22 mm long; anthers free, not con-
nivent, blue, purple, or black with yellow base and apex,
6-12 mm long; style 8—15 mm long 1 . W. mackenzii
lb Flowers nodding, tepals 6-16 mm long; anthers connate and
connivent, yellow at least in basal 1/2, 4-8 mm long; style
4. 0-8. 5 mm long:
2a Plants erect or sprawling, free-standing, mostly
unbranched; stems and pedicels smooth, scabrid or with
hooked prickles; leaves not cirrhose; tepals plain white,
pink, mauve, or blue 2. W. nutans
2b Plants usually straggling or climbing, well branched; stems
and pedicels always armed with hooked prickles; upper
leaves cirrhose, with tendril-like apex; tepals white with
basal purple blotch 3. W gracilis
I . Walleria mackenzii J.Kirk in Transactions of
the Linnean Society 24: 497, t. 52/2 (1864). Type:
Nyasaland [Malawi], Manganja Hills, near Bishop
Mackenzies Mission, 1863, H. Waller sub J. Kirk s.n.
K256015 (K, holo.!). Illustration: Cowley & Brummitt
(2001).
W. angolensis Baker: 262 (1878). Type: Angola,
Huilla, 18 Dec. 1859, Welwitsch 1749 (BM, holo.!; K,
iso.!).
Deciduous geophyte, 180-900 mm high. Corm sub-
globose or depressed-globose, 20-40 mm diam. Stem
erect, mostly simple or with 1 or 2 branches, smooth
or rarely scabrid or minutely prickly. Leaves ovate to
narrowly lanceolate, 30-110 x (4— )5— 20(— 28) mm,
upper narrower, base cuneate or weakly cordate but
not amplexicaul, apex acute or rarely cirrhose, midrib
smooth, sometimes scabrid or minutely prickly. Flow-
ers solitary in axils in central portion of stem, erect,
sometimes with additional flower developed in axil of
bracteole; pedicels ascending and ± erect at flowering,
straight or flexible, becoming deflexed or pendulous
in fruit, 13-60 mm long, smooth or scabrid, with lan-
ceolate bracteole 10-26 mm long inserted ± halfway,
rarely lacking; tepals white, pink, or mauve to pale
or bright blue, spreading, elliptic-lanceolate, 13-22 x
2. 5-6. 5 mm, inner slightly narrower than outer. Stamens
erect, free and not connivent; filaments 1-3 mm long,
awl-shaped; anthers 6-12 mm long, blue to purple or
black with yellow base and apex, pores circular, apical.
Ovary subglobose-pyramidal, 3-lobed above, ± 3 mm
long; style 8-15 mm long. Capsule subglobose or ovoid,
10-20 mm long, maturing to dark yellow. Seeds ovoid,
± 5 mm long, dark mahogany-brown, papillate, papillae
becoming longer and more finger-like in distal half, each
with apical tuft of minute trichomes. Flowering time :
mainly Nov. -Jan. (-Mar.), shortly after the onset of the
rains.
Distribution and ecology: distributed across southern
tropical Africa, from the higher-lying parts of central
Angola, Zambia, and southern Democratic Republic of
Congo, through Malawi into southern and western Tan-
zania [see Carter (1962) for map]. The species is largely
restricted to higher rainfall areas, where it occurs in
open woodland and savanna, often in rocky outcrops.
Diagnosis and relationships : distinguished from other
species of Walleria by its generally more robust habit,
erect, mostly larger flowers with tepals 13-22 mm long,
and free anthers not cohering at the tips, predominantly
blue to purple or black with only the base and tips yel-
low, and dehiscing through terminal, circular pores.
Walleria mackenzii is likely to be confused only with
W. nutans , which has nodding flowers with tepals 6-16
mm long and connivent anthers, connate at the tips, and
dehiscing through short, subapical, introrse slits.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
23
2. Walleria nutans J.Kirk in Transactions of the Lin-
nean Society 24: 497, t. 52/1 (1864). W. mackenzii var.
nutans (J.Kirk) Baker: 498 (1879). Type: Nyasaland
[Malawi], Manganja Hills, near Bishop Mackenzies
Mission, 1863, H. Waller sub J. Kirk s.n. K256018 (K,
holo.!). Illustration: Dyer: 1321 (1960).
W. muricata N.E.Br.: 145 (1909). Type: Bechuana-
land [Botswana], near Palapye, Jan. 1 898, Lugard 289
(K, holo.!).
W. baumii Dammer: 361 (1912). Types: Angola,
Kunene-Kubangoland, Kalolo, 22 Nov. 1899, Baum 448
(BM, syn.); Angola, Habungo, 28 Nov. 1899, Baum 448
(BM, syn.).
W. hockii De Wild.: 8 (1915). Type: Northern Rho-
desia [Zambia], Kafue Valley, 1911, A. Hock s.n.
BR8642639 (BR, holo.!).
Deciduous geophyte (70-) 100-300 mm high. Corm
subglobose or depressed-globose, 20-30 mm diam. Stem
erect or sprawling but never climbing, mostly simple or
with 1 or 2 branches, rarely more, smooth or variously
prickly with delicate, recurved prickles 0.5-1 .5 mm
long. Leaves linear to narrowly lanceolate, (30— )70— 1 50
x ( 2— )5— 7(— 12) mm, upper narrower and attenuate, base
cuneate or weakly cordate but not amplexicaul, midrib
smooth or with recurved prickles beneath. Flowers soli-
tary in axils in central portion of stem, nodding, some-
times with additional flower developed in axil of bracte-
ole; pedicels suberect but sharply decurved distally,
20-50(-80) mm long, smooth or scabrid, with lanceolate
bracteole 10-15 mm long inserted in upper third or quar-
ter; tepals white, pink, or mauve to pale blue, recurved
or reflexed, lanceolate, (6-) 10-1 6 x 2-5 mm. Stamens
connivent, connate at tips; filaments 0. 5-1.0 mm long;
anthers (4— )6— 8 mm long, mostly yellow with narrow
purple band across distal third and with grey tips, slits
short, subapical, introrse. Ovary subglobose-pyramidal,
3-lobed above, ± 3 mm long; style 5. 0-8. 5 mm long.
Capsule ovoid, shortly apiculate and 3-lobed above,
8-17 mm long, green, yellow or orange. Seeds ovoid,
± 5 mm long, dark mahogany-brown, papillate, papil-
lae becoming longer and more finger-like in distal half,
each with apical tuff of minute trichomes. Chromosome
number. 2n = 12 (Goldblatt & Manning 1989). Flower-
ing time: Nov.-Jan.(-Mar.). Figure 1A, B.
Distribution and ecology, widely distributed through
subtropical Africa, from the higher-lying parts of cen-
tral and northern Namibia and southern Angola through
Zambia into eastern Botswana and the northern part
of South Africa, where it has been recorded from the
Soutpansberg into central Limpopo, adjacent Mpuma-
langa and North West Province, and southwest as far as
Taung in Northern Cape (Figure 2). Plants occur in open
savanna, mostly in sandy soils but also on limestone
flats and dolomite rock sheets.
Diagnosis and relationships', closely resembling the
southwestern Cape W. gracilis, with which it shares
nodding flowers with apically connivent anthers dehisc-
ing through introrse, subapical pores and sometimes
prickly stems, pedicels, and abaxial leaf midribs. Walle-
ria nutans is distinguished by its free-standing, mostly
FIGURE 1. — A, B, Walleria nutans : A, flower; B, detached anther.
C-K, W. gracilis'. C, flowering plant; D, flower; E, outer tepal;
F, inner tepal; G, half-flower; H, androecium with style; 1, gyn-
oecium; J, capsule; K, seed. Scale bar: A, C-F, J, 10 mm; B, G-I,
2 mm. Artist: John Manning.
24
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Walleria nutans.
unbranched stems, leaves without tendril-like tips, and
unmarked, white, pink, or mauve to pale blue tepals.
The stems, pedicels and underside of the leaf mid-
ribs may be smooth or variously armed with recurved
prickles, but these are delicate, almost bristle-like, and
mostly < 1 mm long, and the anthers are mostly yellow,
with the purple and grey banding restricted to the apical
third. The presentation of the flowers is subtly different
in the two species: pedicels in W. nutans are essentially
suberect up to the level of insertion of the bracteole in
the upper third or quarter, at which point the pedicels are
sharply decurved, whereas the bracteoles in W. gracilis
are mostly inserted ± midway along the pedicels, which
are therefore more arcuate.
Vernacular name: bush potato.
Representative specimens
NAMIBIA. — 1723 (Singalamwe): Singalamwe, (-CB), 23 Nov.
1973, Pienaar & Vahnneijer 209 (PRE). 1820 (Tarikora): Gautscha
Pan, E of Karakuwise, (-DD), 27 Dec. 1952, Maguire 2194 (NBG);
Cigarette, NE of Karakuwise, (-DD), 19 Jan. 1953 (fruiting), Maguire
2275 (NBG). 1914 (Kamanjab): Ombutu, (-BC), 25 Feb. 1969, Grob-
belaar 85 (PRE). 1917 (Tsumeb): Tsumeb, (-BA), Dec. 1935, Boss
35483 (PRE). 1920 (Tsumkvve): 157 miles [250 km] E of Grootfon-
tein, Simkue, (-DA), 14 Jan. 1958, Story 6117 (PRE). 2016 (Otji-
warongo): Farm Uitsig, 60 km E-NE of Otjiwarongo, (-BC), 5 Mar.
1984 (ex hort.), Lavranos 21034 (NBG). 2017 (Waterberg): Water-
berg, Farm Okamuru, (-CA), 5 Mar. 1974, Merxmiiller & Giess 30063
(PRE). 2118 (Steinhausen): 15 km along Kapps Farm road from Stein-
hausen to Windhoek, (-CC), 15 Mar. 1988 (fruiting), Gotdblatt &
Manning 8802 (MO, PRE). 2215 (Trekkopje): Aukas, (-AA), 28 Nov.
1980, Dinter 654 (SAM); Farm Neuschwaben, Undasbank, (-DB), 8
Mar. 1953 (fruiting), Kinges 3061 (PRE). 2217 (Windhoek): Wind-
hoek, Farm Lichtenstein, (-CD), 20 Jan. 1923, Dinter 4310 (SAM).
BOTSWANA.— 2225 (Mokatini): N of Lephephe, 100 km W of
Serowe, (-BC), Feb. 1982 (fruiting), Snyman & Noailles 231 (PRE).
2426 (Mochudi): Mochudi, (-AC), without date, Rogers 6739 (BOL).
LIMPOPO. — 2229 (Waterpoort): Soutpansberg, Wylies Poort,
Ingwe Farm, (-DD), 18 Dec. 1960, Hardy 407 (PRE). 2329 (Peters-
burg) [Polokwane]: Buffelsberg near Munnik, (-DB), Dec. 1932,
Schyveickerdt 1036 (PRE); Broederstroom, (-DD), 19 Nov. 1949,
Prosser 1361 (NBG). 2428 (Nylstroom): Vaalwater Poort on Nyl-
stroom road, (-AC), 16 Dec. 1960, Hardy & Bayliss 421 (PRE).
NORTH WEST. — 2526 (Zeerust): Lichtenburg, Grasfontein,
(-CC), Dec. 1929, Sutton 338 (PRE). 2527 (Rustenburg): Broeder-
stroom, (-DD), 19 Nov. 1949, Prosser 1361 (PRE).
MPUMALANGA. — 2430 (Pilgrim’s Rest): Nooitgedacht mtn, near
Branddraai, (-DA), 24 Nov. 1933, Young A688 (BOL," PRE).
NORTHERN CAPE. — -2724 (Taung): Barkly West, Madipelessa,
(-CA), 26 Feb. 1937, Acocks 1822 (PRE).
3. Walleria gracilis (Salisb.) S. Carter in Kew Bul-
letin 16: 189 (1962). Androsyne gracilis Salisb.: 61
(1866). Type: stated as from Nicobar Islands but prob-
ably from South Africa, Western Cape, comm. William
Marsden [BM, holo.l; drawing in Salisbury mss. 8: 818
(BM)]. Illustration: Manning et al.AA-Al (2001).
W. armata Schltr. & K. Krause in Krause: 235 (1921).
Type: South Africa, [Western Cape, near Klawer], [Farm]
Windhoek, 8 July 1 896, R. Schlechter 8074 (B, holo. [not
seen]; BM!, BR!, COI!, GRA!, K, MO!, PRE!, S!, iso.).
[The collection was published as Schlechter 2074 in the
protologue, evidently a misprint].
Deciduous geophyte, 100-700 mm high. Corm sub-
globose or depressed-globose, 20-30 mm diam. Stem
straggling or climbing, well branched, with recurved
prickles 1.0-1. 5 mm long in upper parts. Leaves lanceo-
late to narrowly lanceolate, (30— )70— 1 20 x 5-10 mm,
upper narrower and attenuate-cirrhose, apex coiling and
tendril-like, amplexicaul, midrib with recurved prick-
les beneath. Flowers solitary in axils in central por-
tion of stem, nodding, rose-scented; pedicels arcuate,
20-40 mm long, sparsely prickly, with lanceolate bracte-
ole 6-10 mm long inserted ± midway; tepals white with
purple blotch at base, recurved or reflexed, lanceolate,
10-16 x 2. 5-3. 5 mm. Stamens connivent, connate at
tips; filaments 0. 5-1.0 mm long; anthers 5-6 mm long,
yellow in lower 1/2 and purple above with grey tips, slits
short, subapical, introrse. Ovaty subglobose-pyramidal,
3-lobed above, ± 2 mm long; style ± 4 mm long. Cap-
sule ovoid, ± 15 mm long, shortly apiculate and 3-lobed
above. Seeds ovoid, ± 5 mm long, dark mahogany-
brown, with conspicuous apical cluster of finger-like
papillae, each topped with tuft of minute trichomes, rest
of seed ± smooth but covered with trichome-tufts. Flow-
ering time : June and July. Figure 1C-K.
Distribution and ecology: the species has a limited,
curiously scattered distribution along the west coast of
South Africa. It is best known from the lower reaches of
the Olifants River in Western Cape, where it has been
recorded along the foot of the Gifberg east of Klawer
and on Pakhuis Pass, some 50 km to the south (Figure
3). At these localities, the species occurs in deep sand
among outcrops of Cape sandstone in arid fynbos vege-
tation. There is evidently a large disjunction in the distri-
bution, based on a single enigmatic collection made by
Rudolph Marloth in 1925 from near Kuboes in the Rich-
tersveld. This locality, 60 km upstream from the mouth
of the Orange River, is 350 km north of Klawer, and to
date W. gracilis has not been re-collected there; nor from
the intervening country. Although the identity of the
Kuboes collection is not in doubt, it is unfortunately a
plant that was cultivated to flowering in Cape Town five
years later; and although the label is explicit in identi-
fying the location at which the tuber was originally col-
lected, the possibility that the locality has been confused
must be considered until the species is rediscovered in
the Richtersveld.
Plants may reach up to 600 mm in height when sup-
ported by small shrubs, but are much shorter in the open.
The nodding, Solanum- like flowers are evidently adap-
tated to buzz pollination, probably by solitary bees in the
family Apidae: Anthophorinae (Manning et at. 2001 ).
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
25
FIGURE 3. — Distribution of WaUeria gracilis.
Diagnosis and relationships : the species closely
resembles W nutans from subtropical Africa and was
treated as conspecific with it by Phillips (1951), but the
two are quite distinct. WaUeria gracilis is recognized
by its straggling or climbing habit, well-branched stem,
more robust prickles ± 1.0-1. 5 mm long, upper leaves
drawn into coiled, tendril-like tips, distinctive white
flowers marked with a large purple blotch at the base of
each tepal, and anthers that are yellow only in the lower
half. The seeds of W. gracilis are also distinctive in
being essentially smooth in the basal half (apart from the
trichome-tufts) with a dense apical cluster of finger-like
papillae. Flowering in W. gracilis takes place during the
winter, whereas W. nutans blooms in summer.
Additional specimens seen
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Kubus [Kuboes] main
kloof, 29 Aug. 1925 [fl. in cult. June 1930], Marloth 12358 (PRE).
WESTERN CAPE.— 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Klawer, Farm Wind-
hoek, NW foothills of Gifberg, (-DA), mid-July 1998, Manning 2180
(NBG), 25 June 2005, Manning 295 IB (NBG), Forest & Manning 542
(NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Clanwilliam, Cedarberg [Pakhuisberge],
Farm Alpha, (-AA), 20 July 1941, Bond 7053 (BOL, NBG).
Eremiolirion J.C. Manning & F.Forest in Bothalia
35: 117 (2005). Type species: Eremiolirion amboense
(Schinz) J.C. Manning & C.A.Mannheimer.
Deciduous geophyte with deep-seated, tunicated
corm, tunics decaying into firm-leathery, coarsely net-
ted fibres extending into neck. Cataphyll 1, extend-
ing to ground level and enclosing leaf sheaths. Foliage
leaves 2, basal, narrowly lanceolate-canaliculate, leath-
ery. Inflorescence a divaricately branching, paniculate
cyme with bracts subtending branches and pedicels only;
pedicels ebracteolate, cemuous at tip, elongating slightly
in fruit and straightening. Flowers actinomorphic, nod-
ding, campanulate, white flushed pink or maroon abaxi-
ally; tepals connate below into short tube with minute,
fringed corona present at mouth of tube, dimorphic,
outer oblong, inner pandurate. Stamens 6, monomor-
phic, erect-symmetrical, inserted near mouth of tube;
filaments short; anthers basifixed, erect and connivent
around style, narrowly lanceolate, dehiscing by oblong
apical pores. Ovary half inferior, with several ovules per
locule; style terete, erect, filiform. Capsules ovoid to
globose. Seeds ellipsoid-pyriform, blackish brown, testa
surface rugose.
1 sp., central and northwest Namibia, southwest
Angola.
Etymology, the name is a compound of the Greek ere-
mios (desert or wilderness) and lirion (lily).
Ethnology, the corms are part of the traditional diet of
the local tribes ( Giess , Volk & Bleissner 6039).
Eremiolirion amboense (Schinz) J.C. Manning &
C.A.Mannheimer in Bothalia 35: 117 (2005). Cyanella
amboensis Schinz: 943 (1902). Type: South West
Africa [Namibia], Amboland [Ovamboland], Ondonga,
[Ondongwa], without date, Rautanen 344 (Z, holo. ! ).
Plants (60—) 1 00—250 mm high. Corms deep-seated,
30 mm diam; tunics decaying into firm-leathery,
coarsely netted fibres extending into neck 10-60 mm
long, pale whitish brown. Leaves 2, basal, suberect, nar-
rowly lanceolate, (10-) 15-25 x (8-) 10-20 mm, attenu-
ate, canaliculate with prominent midrib abaxially, leath-
ery. Inflorescence a divaricately branching, paniculate
cyme with ( l-)3-7-branches, up to 30-flowered; pedi-
cels cemuous at tip, 15-25 mm long, elongating slightly
in fruit and straightening, ultimately 20^10 mm long.
Flowers nodding, campanulate, white flushed pink or
maroon abaxially at base of outer tepals, fragrant; peri-
anth tube ± 4 mm long, with fringed corona 0.5-1 .0 mm
high at mouth of tube forming collar extending over
ovary to surround base of style; outer tepals spreading
from base, oblong, 15-20 x 5-7 mm, obtuse, margins
revolute, inner tepals at first suberect but spreading in
upper 1/2, pandurate and short-clawed, claw ± 2 mm
long, blade ovate, 13-18 x 7-10 mm, apex slightly cuc-
ullate, margins crisped. Stamens monomorphic; fila-
ments terete, ± 0.25 mm; anthers narrowly lanceolate,
9-10 mm long, yellow, dehiscing by oblong apical pores
1.5 mm long. Ovary half-inferior; ovules ± 6 per locule;
style 10-12 mm long, extending shortly beyond anthers,
white. Capsules ovoid to globose, 10-12 x 8-12 mm.
Seeds ellipsoid-pyriform, 4. 0-4. 5 x 3. 0-3. 5 mm, black-
ish brown; testa surface rugose. Flowering time : (mid-
Jan.-)Feb.-Mar.(-early Apr.). Figure 4.
Distribution and ecology, locally common through
the higher-lying parts of west-central and northwestern
Namibia, occurring along the better watered, western edge
of the escarpment from west of Mariental in the south
to Kaokoland in the north (Figure 5) and in southwest-
ern Angola near Lake Arco. The species typically occurs
in colonies, often numbering many individuals, in sandy
loam or heavy clay soils, especially in stony or gravelly
situations. Flowering is dependent on rainfall.
The flowers close at night ± 21:00, re-opening in
the morning ± 09:00. They are fragrant during the day,
with a jasmine-like fragrance at first but later smelling
of stale urine, and are visited by bees and the occasional
moth (Ward, Ward & Ward 10518).
Vernacular name : desert snowdrop.
Representative specimens
ANGOLA. — Namibe Prov., Lake Arco, Jan. 2009 (fl. ex cult. Mar.
2012), Harrower 4061 (NBG).
26
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 4. — Eremiolirion amboense: A, flowering plant; B, flower; C, inner tepal; D, outer tepal; E, half-flower; F, androecium with style; G,
capsule; H, seed. Scale bar: A-D, G, 10 mm; E, F & H, 2 mm. Artist: John Manning.
NAMIBIA. — 1713 (Swartbooisdril): West of Ombazu, (-DD), 9
Apr. 1973, Giess & Van der Walt 12658 (WIND). 1913 (Sesfontein):
Kunene, Barab River, (-DB), 23 Mar. 2001, Burke 1020 (WIND).
1914 (Kamanjab): Etendeka Mountain Camp, (-DD), 28 Feb. 2004,
Mannheimer 2510 (NBG, WIND). 1915 (Okaukuejo): Etosha,
Adamax, (-BB), 16 Jan. 1974, Le Roux 597 (PRE, WIND). 2014
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
27
(Khorixas): S side of watershed Ugab/Huab Rivers W of Brandberg,
(-CA), 10 Apr. 1989, Ward, Ward & Ward 10518 (PRE, WIND). 2114
(Uis): Omaruru, (-BA), 20 Mar. 1967, Giess 9708 (PRE, WIND).
2315 (Rostock): Swakopmund, W of Kuiseb Canyon, (-BD), 10 Feb.
1966, Giess 9131 (PRE, WIND); Farm Greylingshof SW 107, (-BD),
16 Feb. 1963, Giess, Volk & Bleissner 5158 (PRE, WIND).
Cyanella Royen ex L ., Genera plantarum, edn. 5: 149
(1754). Type species: Cyanella hyacinthoides Royen ex
L.
Pharetrella Salisb.: 47 (1866). Cyanella sect. Phare-
trella (Salisb.) Pax & K.Hoffm.: 427 (1930). Type spe-
cies: P. alba (L.f.) Salisb. = Cyanella alba L.f.
Trigella Salisb.: 46 (1866). Cyanella sect. Trigella
(Salisb.) Pax & K.Hoffm.: 427 (1930). Type species:
T. orchidiformis (Jacq.) Salisb. = Cyanella orchidiformis
Jacq.
Note\ Pax & Hoffmann (1930) inadvertently trans-
posed the species and diagnoses of their sections Phare-
trella and Trigella , assigning Cyanella alba to sect.
Trigella and C. orchidiformis to sect. Pharetrella , thus
precisely opposed to Salisbury’s (1866) original place-
ment. As Pax & Hoffmann were explicitly making com-
binations based on Salisbury’s genera, however, the
types are fixed according to Salisbury's designations,
which are followed here.
Deciduous geophytes with deep-seated, tunicated
corm, tunics decaying into fibrous or firm-leathery,
coarsely netted fibres, sometimes extending into neck.
Cataphyll 1, extending to ground level and enclos-
ing leaf sheaths, entirely sheathing or with short leafy
blade. Stem simple or branched, smooth or minutely and
sparsely scabridulous. Foliage leaves 3-12, basal, lan-
ceolate to linear-lanceolate and canaliculate or filiform-
terete, firm-textured or softer, margins plane, undulate
or crispulate, smooth or scabridulous or ciliate, sur-
face mostly glabrous, rarely puberulous. Inflorescence
a raceme, usually branched, rarely highly condensed
and flowers apparently solitary, with bracts subtend-
ing branches and pedicels; pedicels suberect or spread-
ing, with solitary bracteole inserted ± midway. Flowers
zygomorphic (perianth only weakly so through tepal ori-
entation) or asymmetric (enantiomorphic) through stylar
flexure, spreading-rotate, white, yellow, orange, pink,
or mauve to blue, sometimes distinctly veined or pat-
terned, scented; tepals free, spreading or reflexed, ± sim-
ilar or weakly dimorphic with inner broader, ovate to
oblanceolate, lower concave or ± cucullate. Stamens 6,
dimorphic, either with 3 smaller posterior stamens plus
3 larger anterior stamens, or 5 smaller posterior stamens
plus I larger anterior stamen and then lowermost either
median or flexed laterally to left or right, suberect, upper
stamens arcuate, lower stamen(s) declinate; filaments
stout; anthers basifixed, upper sometimes adherent, nar-
rowly lanceolate, dehiscing by apical pores or short,
introrse slits. Ovary half-inferior, with several ovules
per locule; style terete, declinate, filiform, median or
flexed opposite lower stamen in enantiomorphic species.
Capsules ovoid to globose. Seeds ovoid, black, or dark
brown, testa surface rugose or scalariform. Basic chro-
mosome number, x = 12 (Omduff 1979).
9 spp., southern Namibia and southwestern South
Africa, mainly winter rainfall parts.
Etymology >: the name is a compound of the Greek
kyanus (blue) and -ella (diminutive), alluding to the
small blue flowers of Cyanella hyacinthoides , the first
species to be described.
Ethnobotany: the corms comprise part of the tradi-
tional diet of the Nama tribes ( Archer 410).
I. Section Trigella (Salisb.) Pax & K.Hoffm. in Die
natiirlichen Pflanzenfanrilien 15a: 427 (1930). Trigella
Key to species
la Stamens 3 + 3; flowers pink or mauve (sect. Trigella)'.
2a Leaves linear, occasionally narrowly lanceolate, 2-8 mm wide; perianth not patterned; capsules subglobose-ovoid, 6-10 mm long;
plants from southern Namibia and Richtersveld:
3a Tepals 10-12 mm long; filaments connate < halfway into short tube ± 1 mm long; anthers yellow throughout; style 10-15 mm long,
± twice as long as lower stamens
1 . C. ramosissima
3b Tepals 13-20 mm long; filaments connate halfway or more into tube 1-2 mm long; anthers greyish or mauve distally; style ± 6 mm
long, only slightly longer than lower stamens 2. C. marlothii
2b Leaves lanceolate, 10-30 mm wide; perianth sometimes patterned; capsules ovoid-ellipsoid to oblong, 10-25 mm long; plants from
Richtersveld to Western Cape:
4a Tepals (8— )1 0 — 1 5(— 20) mm long; posterior (upper) filaments arcuate or geniculate-sigmoid, ± evenly thick throughout, not flexuous
distally; anterior (lower) anthers 5-6 mm long 3 . C. orchidiformis
4b Tepals 8-10 mm long; posterior (upper) filaments swollen basally, geniculate-sigmoid and filiform in distal half and strongly flexu-
ous; anterior (lower) anthers 2. 5-3.0 mm long 4. C. cygnea
lb Stamens 5 +1; flowers white, yellow, orange, pink, or mauve to blue (sect. Cyanella):
5a Pedicels suberect; filaments connate at base only; style laterally deflexed to left or right opposite lower stamen and flowers enantiomorphic:
6a Raceme not congested; pedicels 15-30 mm long 8. C. lutea
6b Raceme congested, flowers apparently solitary among leaves; pedicels 80-120 mm long 9. C. alba
5b Pedicels ± geniculate, spreading horizontally at first then sharply flexed upwards, rarely suberect or arcuate; filaments connate for half
or more; style median and flowers not enantiomorphic:
7a Raceme lax, lower flowers 1. 5-3.0 x their length apart; bracteoles sub-basal; perianth orange 7. C. aquatica
7b Raceme dense, lower flowers 0.5-0. 6 x their length apart; bracteoles usually inserted in distal half of pedicel, rarely sub-basal; peri-
anth white, pink, or mauve to blue:
8a Upper cataphyll purple-reticulate; leaves linear, mostly 1-4 mm wide, margins conspicuously ciliate in basal half with long,
shaggy cilia 2-3 mm long but ± smooth distally
6. C. pen t her i
8b Upper cataphyll usually pale, rarely purple-reticulate; leaves linear or lanceolate, mostly 4-15 mm wide, margins smooth or ciliol-
ate along entire length with short hairs up to 1 mm long 5. C. hyacinthoides
28
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
Salisb. : 46 (1866). Type species: Cyanella orchidiformis
Jacq.
Flowers never enantiostylous; perianth pink to
mauve, sometimes patterned. Stamens 3 + 3, lower
anthers tapering, upper anthers ± sagittate. Ovary, style
median.
1. Cyanella ramosissima (Engl. & Krause) Engl. &
Krause in Krause, Botanische Jahrbticher fur Systematik
57: 239 (1921). Iphigenia ramosissima Engl. & Krause:
124 (1910). Type: Namibia, Aus, Kubub, Oct. 1906, P.
Range 139 (Z, holo.; SAM, iso.!).
C. krauseana Dinter & G.M. Schulze: 525 (1941).
Type: Namibia, Klinghardtsgebirge, 23 Sept. 1922, M.K.
Dinter 3955 (B, holo.f; PRE!, SAM!, iso.).
Plants 80-200 mm high. Corms moderately or very
deep-seated, 1 5-30 mm diam., tunics of coarsely net-
ted, wiry fibres, extending shortly into a fibrous neck
to 20 mm long, pale brown or grey. Basal leaves 4-6,
spreading or suberect, linear to narrowly lanceolate,
50—1 50(— 200) x 2-8 mm, acute to attenuate, plane,
canaliculate or rarely involute, with prominent mid-
rib and ribbed veins abaxially, firm-textured, glabrous,
margins often ± undulate, usually ciliolate. Inflores-
cence a dense raceme up to 1 5(-20)-flowered, simple
or 1- or 2-branched, lower flowers 0.2-0. 5 x pedicel
length apart; pedicels suberect but deflexed at bracteole,
mostly 15-30 mm long; bracteoles mostly inserted in
upper third or quarter. Flowers facing outwards, pale to
deep pink or mauve with darker veins, fragrant; tepals
spreading, outer elliptic, 13-20 x 3-4 mm, apiculate,
inner oblanceolate, 13-20 x 4-7 mm, narrowed below.
Stamens dimorphic, 3 + 3; filaments of posterior cluster
sometimes almost geniculate, 2.5-3.0(-4.0) mm long,
swollen basal ly and connate into short tube up to 1 mm
long, yellow, anthers ± sagittate, outer smaller, ± 1 .5 mm
long, median ± 2 mm long, yellow; filaments of anterior
cluster deflexed, 2. 0-2. 5 mm long, shortly connate for
up to 1 mm, anthers 4-5 mm long, yellow. Ovary half-
inferior, style medially deflexed, 10-15 mm long, almost
twice as long as lower stamens. Capsules erect, sub-
globose-ovoid, 7-10 x 7 mm, 3-lobed. Seeds unknown.
Flowering time : mainly Jul. and Aug. (-early Oct.).
Distribution and ecology, restricted to the win-
ter rainfall part of southern Nambia, where it has been
FIGURE 5.- — Distribution of Eremiolirion amboense , o; Cyanella ram-
osissima, • .
recorded on the higher ground, 350-1 050 m, from Aus
and the Klinghardt Mtns along the Huib Hoch Plateau,
extending into the central Richtersveld in South Africa
as far south as Eksteenfontein (Figure 5). The species
occurs on open stony flats, alluvial ridges, rocky terraces
or sometimes on sandy or calcareous flats, in arid succu-
lent karoo shrubland or sparse desert vegetation.
Diagnosis and relationships: readily recognized by
the linear leaves, 2-8 mm wide, and dense raceme of
large, pink to mauve flowers with 3 + 3 arrangement of
stamens with plain yellow anthers, and a consistently
long style, 10-15 mm long, thus almost twice as long as
the lower stamens. Cyanella ramosissima may be con-
fused with vegetatively similar C. marlothii, which has
smaller flowers with the filaments of all six stamens con-
nate for half or more of their length into a tube 1-2 mm
long, bicoloured anthers, and a short style, ± 6 mm long.
The distinctive combination of narrow leaves and a
long style separates C. ramosissima from the forms of
C. orchidiformis with unpattemed tepals. The two spe-
cies share smaller upper lateral anthers and otherwise
resemble one another very closely although they are
readily distinguished in fruit, as C. ramosissima has
much smaller, subglobose or ovoid capsule, 7-10 mm
long vs. the large, oblong or ellipsoidal capsules,
12-15 mm long of C. orchidiformis. Although C. orchid-
iformis mostly has the style shorter than the lower
anthers, occasional collections (see below) have elon-
gated styles like those of C. ramosissima. In the absence
of fruits, such aberrant plants can be identified by their
broader, soft-textured leaves and slightly larger anthers,
tinged greyish distally. The two species are essentially
allopatric, overlapping in their distribution only in the
Richtersveld, where C. ramosissima is restricted to the
mountainous central region whilst C. orchidiformis
extends around the fringes.
Representative specimens
NAMIBIA. — 2616 (Aus): Farm Klein Aus, (-CB), 11 Aug. 1959,
Giess & Van Vuuren 756 (BOL, PRE); 200 m N of T-junction, (-CB),
21 Oct. 1983, Van Berkel 538 (NBG); Luderitz District, Farm Aub, (—
CB), without date, Lavranos & Pehlemann 21700 (MO); Aus Town-
lands, (-CB), Sept. 1983, Lavranos & Pehlemann 21592 (MO). 2715
(Bogenfels): Klinghardtberge, (-BD), 17 Aug. 1986, Van Berkel 571
(NBG, PRE); W Hockster Mtns, 2 km NW of Hockster, (-BD), 21 July
1986, Van Berkel 558 (NBG). 2716 (Witputz): Namuskluft, (-DD), 1 1
July 1988, Bruyns 3191 (NBG); Farm Spitskop, Rosh Pinah, (-DD),
Aug. 1981, Lavranos 19935 (MO). 2817 (Vioolsdrif): Orange River
just east of confluence with Fish River, (-AA), 1 July 1989, Oliver
9177 (NBG).
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2817 (Vioolsdrif): crest of ridge near Hot-
tentotsparadys, (-AC), 9 Sept. 1996, Bayer & Puttock SAF96157
(NBG); Stinkfontein Mtns, near foot of Cornellsberg, (-CA), 22 Aug.
1994, Goldblatt & Manning 9952 (NBG); E of Eksteenfontein, (-CD).
July 1989, Williamson 4264 (NBG).
2. Cyanella marlothii J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, sp.
nov.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 2817 (Vioolsdrif): sandy
flats between Jasper’s werf and Doompoort [Doring-
poort Farm at W foot of Ploegberg], (-CA), 26 Aug.
1925, R. Marloth 1211 (PRE, holo.).
Plants 200-350 mm high. Corms moderately deep-
seated, 15-30 mm diam., tunics of coarsely netted, wiry
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
29
FIGURE 6. — Cyanella floral details.
A, B, C. orchidiformis : A,
flower; B, stamens and style.
C, D, C. cygnea : C, flower; D,
stamens and style. E, C. mar-
lothii, stamens and style. F-H,
C. hyacinthoides : F, flower;
G, stamens and style; H, dor-
sal view of upper stamens. I,
J, C. aquatica : I, flower; J, sta-
mens and style. K., L, C. lutea:
K, flower; L, stamens and
style. M, N, C. alba : M, flow-
er; N, stamens and style. Scale
bar: A, C, F, I, K, M, 10 mm;
B, D, E, G, H, J, L, N, 2 mm.
Artist: John Manning.
fibres, extending shortly into a fibrous neck to 20 mm
long, pale brown or grey. Basal leaves 4-6, suberect,
linear or linear-lanceolate, 50-100 x 2-6 mm, acute to
attenuate, canaliculate or involute, with prominent mid-
rib and ribbed veins abaxially, firm -textured, glabrous,
margins ± undulate, sparsely scabridulous-ciliolate.
Inflorescence a moderately dense raceme up to 20-11 ow-
ered, with up to 2 branches, lower flowers 0.5-0. 6 x
pedicel length apart; pedicels suberect, deflexed at
bracteole, mostly 20-30 mm long; bracteoles inserted
in upper third. Flowers facing outwards, pale mauve
(‘blue’) with darker veins, presumably fragrant; tepals
spreading, outer elliptic, 10-12 x 2-3 mm, apiculate,
inner oblanceolate, 10-12 x 2-3 mm, narrowed below.
Stamens dimorphic, 3 + 3; filaments erect but deflexed
apically, 2-3 mm long, connate halfway or more into
cylindrical tube 1-2 mm long; posterior anthers ± sag-
ittate, outer smaller, 1. 5-2.0 mm long, median 2.0-
2.5 mm long, yellow but greyish or mauve distally, ante-
rior anthers 3^1 mm long, yellow basally but greyish
or mauve in distal 2/3. Ovary half-inferior; style medi-
ally deflexed, ± 6 mm long, extending shortly beyond
anthers. Capsules subglobose, 6-7 mm diam., 3-lobed.
Seeds unknown. Flowering time'. Aug.-Sept. Figure 6E.
Distribution and ecology, thus far known from a sin-
gle collection from sandy flats near the Ploegberg, south
of Kuboes in the Richtersveld (Figure 7).
Diagnosis and relationships', this distinctive species
has the 3 + 3 arrangement of stamens that characterizes
sect. Trigel/a , but is distinguished from other members
in the section by having the filaments of all six sta-
mens connate for half to two-thirds of their length into
a cylindrical or conical tube that completely encloses
30
Bothalia42,l (2012)
FIGURE 7. — Distribution of Cyanella marlothii, o; C. orchidi-
formis, •.
the ovary. Although the species is based on just a sin-
gle collection, this comprises three essentially identical
individuals. These plants were included in C. orchidi-
formis until now, despite their unique androecium. In
this context it is significant that Marloth, who also col-
lected true C. orchidiformis from Steinkopf on the same
trip as C. marlothii , correctly identified the former but
treated the latter as C. capensis (now C. hyacinthoides),
a clear indication that he considered the Ploegberg col-
lection to be distinct from C. orchidiformis , although he
was misled by the connate filaments into misidentifying
it as C. hyacinthoides. The latter does not occur in the
Richtersveld, and is in any event immediately distin-
guished by its 5 + 1 arrangement of anthers and by the
spreading-geniculate pedicels.
Among the members of sect. Trigella , C. marlothii
resembles C. ramosissima in its narrow leaves, 2-6 mm
wide, pale mauve or blue flowers with darker veins, and
apparently ± globose capsules, but is separated from it
by its smaller flowers with tepals 10-12 vs. 13-20 mm
long, bicoloured vs. plain yellow anthers, and shorter
style, ± 6 mm long and only slightly longer than the
anthers vs. 10-15 mm long and ± twice as long as the
anthers.
We have considered the possibility that the collec-
tion may be hybrid between a member of sect. Tri-
gella ( C . cygnea is recorded from the Kuboes area) and
C. hyacinthoides , but discount this in view of the con-
sistent appearance of the plants and the lack of other
intermediate characters. This possibility did not suggest
itself to Marloth, who did not record any potential parent
species at the site. The absence of additional collections
of the taxon is unfortunate but not unique — no further
plants of W. gracilis have been recorded from the Rich-
tersveld since Marloth’s collection on 29 August 1925,
just three days after his collection of C. marlothii (but
see this species for further comment).
3. Cyanella orchidiformis Jacq., Collectanea 4: 211
(1791). Trigella orchidiformis (Jacq.) Salisb. : 46 (1866).
Type: South Africa, without locality or collector, illus-
tration in Jacquin, leones plantarum rariorum 2: t. 447
(1786-1793).
Plants 150-500 mm high. Conns moderately or very
deep-seated, 15-30 mm diam., tunics of coarsely net-
ted, woody fibres, sometimes connate below into flat
claws, extending shortly into a fibrous neck up to 20 mm
long, chestnut-brown. Basal leaves 4-6, suberect or
spreading, lanceolate, 70-250 x 1 0— 25(— 30) mm, acute
to attenuate, plane or canaliculate, with prominent mid-
rib abaxially, soft-textured, glabrous, margins plane or
undulate, smooth or ciliolate-scabridulous. Inflores-
cence a moderately dense raceme up to 35-flowered,
with 1 or 2 branches, lower flowers 0.5-0. 8 x pedicel
length apart; pedicels suberect and deflexed at bracteole,
mostly 15-30 mm long; bracteoles mostly inserted in
upper third or quarter, sometimes in lower half or quar-
ter. Flowers facing outwards, pink or mauve with darker
veins, sometimes with darker centre, or with paler cen-
tre variously speckled with dark pink, the whole outlined
with darker shading, fragrant; tepals spreading, outer
elliptic, (8—) 1 0— 1 5(— 20) x 4-5 mm, apiculate, inner
oblanceolate, (8 — ) 1 0—1 5( — 20) x 5-6 mm, narrowed
below. Stamens dimorphic, 3 + 3; filaments of poste-
rior cluster arcuate to geniculate-sigmoid, 2-5 mm long,
connate at extreme base only, ± evenly thick through-
out, yellow with white base, anthers ± sagittate, outer
smaller, 1-2 mm long, median 2-3 mm, yellow, but grey
to purple distally; filaments of anterior cluster deflexed,
1.5-2. 5 mm long, connate at extreme base, anthers
5-6 mm long, pale yellow at base, greyish or purple dis-
tally. Ovary half-inferior; style medially deflexed, (4-)5-
13 mm long, ± as long as or extending well beyond
anthers. Capsules erect, ovoid-ellipsoid to oblong,
14-25(-30) x 8-10 mm, pale with purplish reticulation.
Seeds ovoid-ellipsoid, 3^1 x 1. 5-2.0 mm, glossy black,
rugose. Chromosome number : 2n = 24 (Ornduff 1979).
Flowering time : (mid-)late Jul.-late Sept. Figure 6A, B.
Distribution and ecology, occurring along the west-
ern escarpment, from just north of Steinkopf in northern
Namaqualand to Citrusdal in the Olifants River Valley
(Figure 7). Collections from the Richtersveld cited under
this species by Scott (1991) are referable to C. cygnea ,
evident from their filiform, sigmoid upper filaments and
smaller anthers. Plants grow mostly in clay or loamy
soils, often in rock crevices in granite or sandstone,
where they benefit from extra moisture through run-
off among rocks along the courses of seasonal streams,
especially in Namaqualand.
Diagnosis and relationships : the most common
and widespread of the three species of sect. Trigella ,
C. orchidiformis, is recognized by its lanceolate leaves,
10-25 mm wide, and racemes of pink to mauve flowers,
mostly darker or patterned toward the centre, with the
anthers partially or almost wholly greyish or purple, and
large, ovoid-ellipsoid fruits, 14-25 mm long. The three
species are essentially parapatric or allopatric, although
both C. cygnea and C. orchidiformis have been collected
near Steinkopf ( Marloth 6761. 6761 A). An exceptionally
large-flowered variant with tepals 20 x 6-7 mm has been
collected on the Gifberg Pass, growing in sandstone soil
after fire ( Goldblatt & Porter 13190), and may be poly-
ploid.
Cyanella orchidiformis is closely allied to C. cygnea,
with which it shares the distinctive large fruits, patterned
perianth, and coloured anthers, but from which it is dis-
tinguished by its generally larger flowers, with tepals
mostly 10-13 mm long vs. 8-10 mm long, and its unex-
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
31
ceptional stamens. The upper filaments in C. orchidi-
formis are arcuate or weakly geniculate, without a bul-
bous base and not evidently filiform in the distal half,
and the lower anthers are relatively large, 5-6 mm long.
The style is very variable in length, mostly 5-10 mm
long, but occasionally up to 15 mm long. In contrast,
C. cygnea has mostly smaller flowers, with tepals
8-10 mm long and very distinctive stamens, with the
upper filaments geniculately sigmoid and sharply nar-
rowed and filiform in the distal half, with much smaller
lower anthers, 2. 5-3.0 mm long, and a short style
3-4 mm long. The range of C. orchidiformis is largely
to the south and east of C. cygnea but both species have
been collected near Steinkopf.
The relatively broad leaves, 10-30 mm wide, and
large capsules, readily distinguish C. orchidiformis
from C. marlothii and C. ramosissima , which have nar-
row leaves 2-8 mm wide and smaller, subglobose-ovoid
fruits 7-10 mm long.
Vernacular name : waterraap.
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2917 (Springbok): Steinkopf, ( -BA),
Aug. 1925, Marloth 6761 (NBG); 6.5 km W of Steinkopf, (-BA), 29
Sept. 1986, Perry <& Snijman 3560 (NBG); between Springbok and
Steinkopf beyond Bulletrap, (-BC), 29 Sept. 1986, Peny & Snij-
man 3555 (NBG); Spektakel, (-DA), 25 Aug. 1941, Compton 11398
(NBG); Eselsfontein, (-DA), 8 Sept. 1950, Barker 519 (NBG). 3017
(Hondeklipbaai): Spoegivier, (-AD), 12 Sept. 1982, Archer 295
(NBG). 3018 (Kamiesberg): 6 miles [9.6 km] north of Garies, (-CA),
3 Sept. 1945, Leighton 1398 (PRE); Kamiesberg, 41.5 km from turn-
off to Kliprand, (-DC), 15 Sept. 2006, Goldblatt & Porter 12759A
(MO, NBG). 3117 (Lepelfontein): Towerberg Pass between Komkans
and Kotzesrust, (-BB), 3 Sept. 1976, Boucher 3160 (NBG). 3 1 19 (Cal-
vinia): Lokenburg, (-AC), 23 Aug. 1980, Van Berkel 204 (MO).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Meerhofkasteel, (-
AA) , 8 Aug. 1984, Snijman 805 (NBG); Farm Quaggaskop 125, (-
AB) , 11 Aug. 1977, Le Roux 2282 (NBG); 15 miles [24 km] NW of
Koekenaap, (-AD), 19 Aug. 1970, Hall 3766 (NBG); between Trawal
and Olifants River bridge, shale bank, (-DC), 27 Aug. 1991, Goldblatt
& Manning 9121 (MO); Gifberg Pass, Keurlandshoek, (-DD), 25 Sept.
2008, Goldblatt & Porter 13190 (MO, NBG). 3218 (Clanwilliam):
Clanwilliam, (-BB), 5 Aug. 1896, Schlechter 8417 (MO, NBG); 29
July 1943, Lewis NBG1814/32 (NBG); Olifants Dam, (-BB), 14 Sept.
1847, Barker 4768 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Biedouw [Bidouw]
Valley, (-AA), 23 Sept. 1952, Barker 1748 (NBG); Cedarberg Forest
Reserve, Langrug, (-AC), 21 Aug. 1983, Viviers 496 (NBG); Rondegat
River Valley 16 km NW of Algeria, (-BC), 8 Sept. 1976, Thompson
2812 (NBG); near Citrusdal, (-CC), 6 Sept. 1949, Steyn 390 (NBG).
Long-styled morphs
3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Grootvlei, (-BB), Sept. 1945, Lewis 1380
(SAM); 7 Sept. 1945, Barker 3716 (SAM). 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): Hol-
bak Farm, near Doombaai [Doringbaai], (-CD), 5 Sept. 1964, Hal 1 164
(NBG). 3218 (Clanwilliam): S of Clanwilliam, (-BB), 20 Sept. 1954,
De Vos 1719 (NBG); 10 miles [18 km] S of Clanwilliam, (-BB), July
1948, Lewis 2999 (SAM).
4. Cyanella cygnea G. Scott in South African Journal
of Botany 57: 50 (1991). Type: South Africa, [Northern
Cape], 51.4 km from Springbok along road to Komag-
gas, 16 Sept. 1988 [cult, at Karoo Botanic Garden,
Worcester from material collected ± 1978], P.L. Perry
1119 (NBG, holo.!; K, MO, PRE!, iso.).
Plants (150-)200-500 mm high. Corms moder-
ately or very deep-seated, 15-30 mm diam., tunics
of coarsely netted, woody fibres, sometimes connate
below into flat claws, extending shortly into a fibrous
neck up to 20 mm long, chestnut-brown. Basal leaves
4-6, suberect, lanceolate, 80-200 x 1 0— 20(— 25 ) mm,
acute to attenuate, plane or canaliculate, with promi-
nent midrib and ribbed veins abaxially, soft-textured,
glabrous, margins smooth or ciliolate-scabridulous.
Inflorescence a dense or moderately dense raceme up
to 35-flowered, with 1-4 branches, lower flowers 0.2—
0.5 x pedicel length apart; pedicels suberect, deflexed
at bracteole, mostly 1 5-30 mm long; bracteoles mostly
inserted in upper third or quarter. Flowers facing out-
wards, pink with paler centre variously speckled with
dark pink, the whole outlined with darker shading, fra-
grant; tepals spreading, outer elliptic, 8-10 x 4-5 mm,
apiculate, inner obovate, 8-10 x 5-6 mm, narrowed
and short-clawed below. Stamens dimorphic, 3 + 3; fila-
ments of posterior cluster geniculate-sigmoid, 2-5 mm
long, distally filiform and strongly flexuous, swollen
basally, connate at extreme base only, yellow with white
base, anthers ± sagittate, 1. 5-2.0 mm long; filaments of
anterior cluster deflexed, 1.0-1. 5 mm long, connate at
extreme base, anthers 2. 5-3.0 mm long, pale yellow but
greyish in distal half or third. Ovary half-inferior; style
medially deflexed, 3-4 mm long, not extending beyond
anthers. Capsules erect, ovoid-ellipsoid, ( 1 2—) 1 5—20
x 8-10 mm. Seeds ovoid-ellipsoid, 3-4 x 1. 5-2.0 mm,
glossy black, rugose. Flowering time : late Aug.-early
Oct. (-early Nov.). Figure 6C, D.
Distribution and ecology >: restricted to the higher-
lying parts of northern Namaqualand, where it has been
collected in the Richtersveld along the Ploegberg and
Stinkfontein Mtns, from Kuboes to Eksteenfontein, near
Steinkopf, and along the edge of the escarpment around
Komaggas, some 60 km to the south (Figure 8). Plants
grow in rocky situations in open succulent karoo shrub-
land, typically where there is additional moisture such as
along watercourses or in gorges.
Diagnosis and relationships', closely allied to
C. orchidiformis, with which it shares characteristi-
cally mottled flowers and large, ovoid-ellipsoid cap-
sules ± 15 mm long, and greyish or purple markings
or speckling on the anthers. Cyanella cygnea typically
has smaller flowers, with tepals 8-10 vs. (8 — )1 0—1 5( —
20) mm long, but is best identified by its stamens. The
FIGURE 8. — Distribution of Cyanella cygnea.
32
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
strongly geniculate-sigmoid filaments of the posterior
(upper) stamens are bulbous at the base and filiform
in the distal half, giving them a characteristic flexuous
form, the outer pair slightly longer than the median.
All three anthers in the posterior cluster are subequal in
size, 1 .5-2.0 mm long, and the lower anthers are equally
larger, 2. 5-3.0 mm long. In contrast, the upper stamens
in C. orchidiformis are ± uniformly thick except at the
extreme apex and not evidently flexuous, the outer
anthers are slightly smaller than the median, and the
lower anthers are larger, 5-6 mm long, sometimes with
the median larger than the laterals. The distributions of
the two species are largely complementary, with C. cyg-
nea occurring to the north and west of C. orchidiformis ,
but they overlap around Steinkopf.
Vernacular name : wildebeet (wild beet) (Scott 1991 ).
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2816 (Oranjemund): mtns SW of Kuboos
[Khubus], (-BD), 11 Sept. 1973, Lavranos 10834 (MO, PRE). 2817
(Vioolsdrif): Richtersveld, Kodaspiek, (-AA), 2 Sept. 1977, Oliver,
Tolken & Venter 492 (MO); Armmanshoek, (-AC), Aug. 1995, G. & F.
Williamson 5654 (NBG); Richtersveld, near Kubus [Khubus], (-CA),
13 Aug. 1983, Archer 391 (NBG, PRE); Ploegwater at S portion of
Ploegberg, (-CA), 7 Sept. 1991, Germishuizen 5483 (PRE); Stinkfon-
teinberg SW of Vanzylsrus, (-CA), 4 Sept. 1977, Oliver, Tolken & Ven-
ter 626 (NBG); stony flats 4 km N of Eksteenfontein, (-CD), 23 Aug.
2001, Goldblatt & Porter 11751 (MO); 8 km N of Eksteenfontein,
22 Aug. 1994, Goldblatt & Manning 9940 (MO). 2917 (Springbok):
Steinkopf, (-BA), Aug. 1925, Marloth 6761A (NBG); Steinkopf, (—
BC), 9 Aug. 1898, M. Schlechter 119 (MO, PRE); Klipfontein, (-BA),
Sept. 1929, Grant 4840B (MO); Komaggas, Van Reenen se Water, (-
DC), 26 Aug. 1983, Van Wyk 6501 (PRE).
II. Section Cyanella
Flowers sometimes enantiostylous; perianth white,
yellow, orange, pink to mauve, or blue, never patterned.
Stamens 5 + 1; anthers ± oblong. Ovary, style some-
times flexed to left or right.
Series Hyacinthoides J.C. Manning & Goldlbatt, ser.
nov.
Flowers not enantiostylous; pedicels ± geniculate
(horizontally spreading then flexed sharply upwards) or
arcuate; perianth white, orange, pink, or mauve to blue.
Stamens: filaments connate halfway or more. Ovary:
style not flexed sideways. Type species: Cyanella hya-
cinthoides Royen. ex L.
5. Cyanella hyacinthoides Royen ex L., Genera
plantation, edn 5: addendum [522] (1754). C. capen-
sis L.: 985 (1759), norm illegit. superfl. C. pulchella
Salisb.: 249 (1796), nom. illegit. superfl. [Note: Scott’s
(1991) lectotypification of C. pulchella against Jac-
quin’s (1776-1777) illustration of C. capensis L. is
unwarranted and incorrect. There is no indication that
Salisbury had any intention other than of replacing Lin-
naeus’s name with his own]. Type: South Africa, without
precise locality, date or collector, ex herb. Royen Herb.
Linn. 430.2 (LINN, holo.!).
Plants 1 50-400(-500) mm high. Conns deep-seated,
25-30 mm diam., tunics of coarsely netted, wiry or
woody fibres, not or extending shortly into a fibrous
neck to 20 mm long, pale brown or grey. Basal leaves
4 — 9( 1 2), suberect or spreading, linear to narrowly lan-
ceolate, 60-200(-250) x (2— )4— 1 5( — 25) mm, acute to
attenuate, plane, canaliculate or rarely involute, mid-
rib and veins prominent beneath (abaxially), firm-tex-
tured, usually glabrous but veins sometimes scabridu-
lous or puberulous to villous abaxially with hairs up
to 1 mm long, rarely both surfaces densely puberulous
throughout, margins ± undulate or crispulate, usually
ciliolate-scabridulous, sometimes flushed purple basally;
upper cataphyll usually pale, rarely purple-reticulate or
fenestrate. Inflorescence a moderately dense raceme
up to 25-flowered, with 2-4 branches, rarely with sec-
ond order branchlets and thus paniculate, lower flow-
ers 0.3-0. 6 x pedicel length apart; pedicels usually
geniculate, horizontal in basal 1/2 or 2/3 then abruptly
flexed upwards at ± right angles, rarely suberect or arcu-
ate, mostly 20-30 mm long; bracteoles mostly inserted
between lower and upper third, rarely sub-basal. Flow-
ers facing outwards, pale to deep mauve or blue, rarely
white or pink, fragrant; tepals spreading, ovate to obo-
vate, 8-10 x 3 4 mm, apiculate. Stamens dimorphic, 5 +
1; filaments of posterior cluster 1.0-2. 5 mm long, outer
sometimes slightly longer than inner, connate ± halfway
or almost completely into tube 1 .0-2.0 mm long, yellow,
sometimes with small intrastaminal lobules between
bases of filaments, anthers 1 .5— 2.0(— 2.8) mm long,
yellow; anterior stamen with filament ± 1 mm long,
connate to upper cluster for ± half length, anther 2.5-
4.0 mm long, yellow. Ovary half-inferior; style medially
deflexed, 3^4 mm long, not extending beyond anthers.
Capsules erect on geniculate pedicels, subglobose,
5-6 mm diam., 3-lobed and retuse. Seeds ovoid, ± 2 mm
diam., rugulose. Chromosome numbers: 2n = 24, 28 &
48 (Ornduff 1979). Flowering time: mainly mid-Sept-
mid-Dec. but mid-Aug.-mid Oct. in Namaqualand. Fig-
ure 6F-H.
Distribution and ecology: Cyanella hyacinthoides is
widely distributed through the southern African winter-
rainfall region, from just north of Steinkopf southwards
through the higher-lying parts of Namaqualand into
the southwestern Cape as far east as the Gouritz River
(Figure 9), from near sea level to over 1 200 m. It has
been recorded along the Roggeveld Escarpment south
to Matjiesfontein but is absent from the arid Tanqua
River basin and Little Karoo, apart from a single col-
lection south of Oudtshoorn at the foot of the Outeniqua
Mtns. The species has a wide edaphic amplitude and has
FIGURE 9. — Distribution of Cyanella hyacinthoides (pubescent
forms, o).
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
33
been collected on granite, sandstone, and limestone sub-
strates, although it favours loamy or clay soils, where it
is most often found as a component of renosterveld or
succulent karooid communities. It is tolerant of distur-
bance and thrives in old lands and along road verges.
Cyanella hyacinthoides is extremely variable in its
foliage. Plants typically produce 4-6 lanceolate leaves
but some forms may produce up to a dozen linear- in vo-
lute leaves. These narrow-leaved plants are scattered
throughout the range of the species. A more circum-
scribed ecotype occurs along the higher parts of cen-
tral Namaqualand, between Kotzesrus and Springbok.
Plants there tend to have the lower leaf surface vari-
ously scabridulous or villous, with the hairs restricted
to the leaf margins and the adaxial veins and midrib.
In extreme forms, the hairs are shaggy and up to I mm
long but there is a significant variation in the density
and length of the vestiture, even within a single local-
ity, from scarcely puberulous to densely villous leaves.
A collection from north of Komaggas (Barker 7412)
shows a second type of vestiture, with both leaf sur-
faces closely and evenly puberulous. Populations from
elsewhere in the range generally have the leaf surfaces
glabrous, but some plants may have the lower surface
sparsely and minutely scabridulous along the veins.
There is no association between vestiture and other veg-
etative features, such as leaf width or shape. The devel-
opment of leaf pubescence in populations from this part
of Namaqualand has also been recorded in species of
Trachyandra (Asphodelaceae) (Manning & Goldblatt
2007) and Haemanthus (Amaryllidaceae) (Snijman
1984), and appears to represent a widespread ecological
strategy.
Tetraploids have been detected among several wild
populations of Cyanella hyacinthoides (Ornduff 1979),
and it is thus possible that unusually robust specimens
that have been remarked on by various collectors are
polyploids.
Diagnosis and relationships : Cyanella hyacinthoides
is distinguished by the moderately dense, branched
racemes of mauve to blue (rarely white or pink) flow-
ers with 5 + 1 arrangement of stamens with the filaments
connate for ± half their length or more. The connate
filaments and generally horizontally spreading pedi-
cels serve to distinguish the species from pink-flowered
forms of C. lutea , in which the stamens are ± free and
the pedicels mostly suberect.
The species is closely allied to C. pentheri , with
which it has been much confused, and the two were
treated as conspecific by Scott (1991). They are essen-
tially alike in their inflorescence, although the flowers
in C. pentheri are typically paler, mostly white to pale
mauve, but they differ strikingly in their foliage. The
leaves of C. pentheri are linear-aristate and canalicu-
late-involute with margins that are often crispulate and
conspicuously ciliate only towards the base with shaggy
hairs 2. 0-3.0 mm long. Similar long cilia also fringe
the upper cataphyll, which is funnel-shaped, and boldly
pigmented with deep purple along the edges and veins,
giving it a characteristic fenestrate appearance. Although
C. hyacinthoides is highly variable in its foliage, the spe-
cies only rarely produces similarly narrow, crispulate
leaves and in such cases they are either glabrous or are
ciliolate-pubescent along their entire length, with much
shorter hairs 0. 2-1.0 mm long, and the upper cataphyll
is usually unmarked, very rarely ( Goldblatt & Porter
11896) purple-fenestrate. Although the two taxa have
been recorded growing in close proximity in several
localities (see discussion under C. pentheri ), no interme-
diates between them have been found.
Vernacular names : raap, hotnotsraap, klipraap.
Representative specimens
Typical form
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2917 (Springbok): E of Rosies, (-BA), 15
Oct. 1988, Williamson 3978 (NBG); Springbok, 15 miles [24 km] E
of town, (-CB), 12 Oct. 1947, Rodin 2193 (PRE); between Spektakel-
berg and Komaggas, (-DA), 21 Aug. 1982, Le Roux 2957 (NBG).
3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Spoegrivier, (-AD), 20 Sept. 1983, Archer
410 (NBG); Kamieskroon, Skilpad Nature Reserve, (-BB), 18 Sept.
1995, Cruz 92 (MO, NBG); sandy flats E of Kamieskroon at foot of
pass, ( BB ), 3 Nov. 1982, Goldblatt 6651 (MO). 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp):
5 km S of Bitterfontein, (-AB), 9 Sept. 1985, Duncan 184 (NBG);
Vanrhynsdorp, Zandkraal Farm, (-DB), 7 Sept. 1949, Barker 5662
(NBG); 13 km from Vanrhysdorp on road to Nieuwoudtville, (-DB),
31 Aug. 1986, Fellingham 1116 (PRE). 3119 (Calvinia); Oorlogskloof
Nature Reserve, Farm Driefontein, (-AC), 1 Nov. 1996, Pretorius 398
(NBG); along Nieuwoudtville-Loeriesfontein road, (-AB), 11 Sept.
1986, Steiner 1360 (NBG); Doringbos Valley, (-CC), 27 Sept. 1970,
Barker 10725 (NBG). 3217 (Vredenburg): Witteklip Rocks, (-DD), 19
Sept., Perry 3197 (MO). 3218 (Clanwilliam): Lamberts Bay, Nortier
Experimental Farm, (-AB), 6 Nov. 1974, Boucher 2569 (NBG); irri-
gation dam near Clanwilliam, (-BB), Sept. 1935, Smuts PRE59124
(PRE); Clanwilliam, 6.2 km S of Ramskop, (-BB), 26 Sept. 1986,
Peny 3523 (NBG); Piketberg, approaching Moravian Mission at
Goedverwag, (-DC), 3 Oct. 1984, Peny 3214 (MO, NBG). 3219
(Wuppertal): Bidouw, Welbedacht Farm, (-AA), 22 Sept. 1952, John-
son 537 (NBG). Koue Bokkeveld, Ondertuin, (-CC), 28 Dec. 1978,
Hanekom 2519 (MO). 3220 (Sutherland): Roggeveld, Soekop Farm,
(-AA), 11 Sept. 2006, Rosch 660 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Citrus-
dal, (-CC), 30 Sept. 1944, Barker 3075 (NBG). 3318 (Cape Town):
Langebaan, (-AA), 5 Oct. 1969, Axelson 80 (NBG); Yzerfontein, De
la Rey Farm, (-AC), 15 Oct. 1995, Boucher 2557 (NBG); Groenekloof
[Mamre], (-AC), 1850, Zeyher 1718 (NBG); Buck Bay Farm, (-CA),
29 Nov. 1978, Boucher 4156 (PRE); Robben Island, (-CD), 14 Nov.
1985, Lloyd 574 (NBG); Cape Peninsula, Kamps [Camps] Bay, (—
CD), Dec. 1897, Thode s.n. (NBG); Malmesbury, Burgers Post Farm,
(-DA), 17 Oct. 1979, Boucher <£ Shepherd 4839 (NBG); Langver-
wacht above Kuils River, (-DC), 22 Nov. 1973, Oliver 4806 (NBG);
Paarl Mountains Nature Reserve, (-DD), 26 Oct. 1994, Swanepoel 50
(NBG); Jonkershoek, (-DD), 27 Nov. 1973, Smith 141 (NBG). 3319
(Worcester): Ceres, Lakenvlei Farm, (-BC), 19 Oct. 1941, Barker
2004 (NBG); Rawsonville, (-CA), 18 Oct. 1980, Walters 2322 (NBG);
Worcester, (-CB), 17 Oct. 1980, Walters 2310 (NBG); E approach to
Franschhoek Pass, (-CC), 8 Nov. 1987, Goldblatt & Manning 8583
(MO, PRE); Madeba Farm, W of Robertson, (-DD), 8 Oct. 1986,
Hilton-Taylor 1765 (NBG). 3320 (Montagu): Matjiesfontein, (-BA),
24 Oct. 1921, Foley 120 (PRE). 3322 (Oudtshoom): lower N slopes
of Outeniqua Mtns, near Sebrafontein Farm, (-CC), 23 Oct. 1985,
Vlok 1216 (NBG). 3418 (Simonstown): Simonstown, Redhill Plateau,
(-AB), 19 Nov. 1970, Goldblatt 5168 (MO); Cape Peninsula, Noord
Hoek, (-AB), 30 Nov. 1943, Wasserfall 674 (NBG); Muizenberg, (—
AB), Feb. 1907 (mostly in fruit), Rogers TM25828 (PRE); Betty’s
Bay, 2 Dec. 1970, Ebersohn s.n. (NBG). 3419 (Caledon): Hermanus,
Vogelgat, (-AD), 30 Oct. 1986, Williams 3719 (MO, NBG); Genaden-
dal, (-BA), 1854, Roser PRE15439 (PRE); Gansbaai, Grootbos Nature
Reserve, (-CB), 8 Dec. 2007, Lutzeyer s.n. (NBG). 3420 (Bredasdorp):
Swellendam, Bontebok National Park, (-AB), Dec. 1962, Liebenberg
6779 (NBG. PRE); De Hoop, Potberg Nature Reserve, (-AD), 28 Nov.
1978, Burgers 1598 (NBG); Riversdale, Reisiesbaan Siding, (-AB), 31
Oct. 1979, Bohnen 7043 (NBG). 3421 (Riversdale): near Still Bay on
Rietvlei Road, (-AD), 13 Nov. 1982, Bohnen 8152 (NBG); limestone
hills S of Albertinia, (-AD), 4 Dec. 1985, Goldblatt 7421 (MO); Farm
Platbos, 2 km S of Aasvogelberg to Gouritz River, (-BC), 10 Dec.
1981, Stirton 10261 (NBG).
34
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
Hairy forms
NORTHERN CAPE. — 2917 (Springbok): Spektakel Pass, (-DA),
4 Sept. 1951, Martin 835 (NBG), 11 Sept. 1993, Goldblatt & Man-
ning 9715 (MO); Ezelsfontein, (-DA), 8 Sept. 1950, Barker 6656
(NBG); 5 miles [8 km] N of Komaggas, (-DB), 4 Sept. 1951, Barker
7412 (NBG); between Brakwater and Komaggas, (-DB), 9 Sept. 1950,
Barker 6679 (NBG); 64.5 km W of Okiep towards Nababiep, (-DB),
26 Sept. 1986, Perry 3550 (NBG). 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): 7 miles
[11 km] NW of Kamieskroon, (-BB), 25 Sept. 1952, Acocks 16477
(PRE); Kamieskroon, (— BB), 22 Aug. 1959, Barker 9001 (NBG);
Garies Hill, (-BD), 2 Sept. 1951, Barker 7403 (NBG); 19 km S of
Kotzesrus, (-DD), 16 Sept. 2001, Goldblatt & Porter 11896 (MO,
NBG). 3018 (Kamiesberg): 26 km S of Garies on road to Bitterfontein,
Farm Mostertsvlei, (-CA), 30 Sept. 1987, Reid 1310 (PRE).
6. Cyanella pentheri Zahlbr. in Annalen des kaiser-
lichen naturhistorischen Museums 15: 26 (1900). Type:
South Africa, [Western Cape], Olifantrivier [Olifants
River], Aug. [without year], Penther 400 (W, holo.f).
Neotype: South Africa, [Western Cape], Clanwillam,
Biedouw [Bidouw], Welbedacht Farm, 22 Sept. 1952,
A.J. Middebnost 1741 (NBG, neo., designated here;
SAM, iso.).
Note'. The type of Cyanella pentheri is presumed
lost (Scott 1991) but Zahlbruckner’s (1900) description
is quite clear and we designated an extant specimen to
serve as a neotype.
Plants 100-400 mm high. Conns deep-seated,
25-30 mm diam., tunics of coarsely netted, wiry or
woody fibres, extending in a short or very long fibrous
or papery neck to 100 mm long, pale brown. Basal
leaves (5— )9— 1 7, suberect, often ± twisted or coiled api-
cally, linear, 60-150 * 1 — 4(— 5 ) mm, attenuate, canalic-
ulate-involute, with prominent midrib and ribbed veins
abaxially, firm-textured, glabrous or veins puberulous
abaxially, margins straight or ± undulate or crispulate,
conspicuously ciliate in basal parts only with shaggy
hairs 2. 0-3.0 mm long but glabrous distally; upper
cataphyll prominent, with crispulate margins villous
as in leaves, strongly flushed purple towards edge and
along veins, thus fenestrate, sometimes also villous on
veins. Inflorescence a moderately dense raceme up to
25-flowered, simple or up to 4-branched, lower flow-
ers 0.3-0. 6 x pedicel length apart; pedicels genicu-
late, horizontal in basal half or 2/3 then abruptly flexed
upwards at ± right angles, mostly 20-30 mm long;
bracteoles mostly inserted between lower and upper
third, rarely sub-basal. Flowers facing outwards, white
to pale mauve or blue, fragrant; tepals spreading, ovate,
7 11 x 3-4 mm, apiculate. Stamens dimorphic, 5+1;
filaments of posterior cluster 2. 0-3. 5 mm long, connate
± 1/3 to 2/3 into tube 1.0-1. 5 mm long, yellow, anthers
1.5-2. 5 mm long, yellow; anterior stamen with filament
± 1 mm long, connate to upper cluster for ± half length,
anther 2. 5-3. 5 mm long, yellow. Ovary half-inferior;
style medially defiexed, 3-4 mm long, not extending
beyond anthers. Capsules erect on geniculate pedicels,
subglobose, 5-6 mm diam., 3-lobed and retuse. Seeds
unknown. Flowering time', late Aug.-early Oct.
Distribution and ecology'. Cyanella pentheri has a
restricted distribution through the middle reaches of
the Olifants River Valley from north of Citrusdal to
Klawer, extending along the foot of the Gifberg onto the
Bokkeveld Escarpment, and inland to the Bidouw and
Doring River Valleys (Figure 10). Plants favour rocky
FIGURE 10. — Distribution of Cyanella pentheri.
places, often sandstone, mainly in arid fynbos.
Diagnosis and relationships : Cyanella pentheri
has mostly been treated as conspecific with C. hva-
cinthoides, essentially because of the confusion between
true C. pentheri and what we regard as pubescent forms
of C. hvacinthoides. Florally, the two species are cer-
tainly alike in their moderately dense, branched racemes
of spreading, white or mauve to blue flowers with 5 + 1
arrangement of stamens with the filaments connate for ±
half their length or more, but they differ significantly in
their foliage. The leaves of C. pentheri are consistently
linear and canaliculate-involute, mostly l^t mm wide,
with margins that are conspicuously ciliate only towards
the base with long, shaggy hairs 2. 0-3.0 mm long. Simi-
lar, long cilia also fringe the upper cataphyll, which is
funnel-shaped, and strikingly pigmented with deep pur-
ple along the edges and veins, giving it a characteristic
fenestrate appearance. The leaves of C. hvacinthoides,
in contrast, are mostly lanceolate and 4-15 mm wide,
rarely narrower, with margins either smooth or ciliolate-
pubescent along their entire length, with much shorter
hairs 0. 2-1.0 mm long, and the upper cataphyll is usu-
ally unmarked. Pubescent forms of C. hvacinthoides
from central Namaqualand have leaves that are variously
puberulous to villous, but never with the long cilia char-
acteristic of C. pentheri.
The variation in vestiture in C. hvacinthoides is not
correlated with leaf shape, unlike the situation in C. pen-
theri. This is compelling evidence that C. pentheri repre-
sents a distinct genotype, which is further corroborated
by the fact that the vegetative differences between the
two species are maintained wherever the two have been
collected together, notably north of Klawer at Zandkraal
Farm (Barker 5648 vs Barker 5662), Welbedacht Farm
in the Bidouw Valley (Middelmost 1741 vs Johnson
537) and Clanwilliam (Perry 3526 vs Barker 4771). We
have examined both taxa growing together just outside
Clanwilliam ourselves and at none of these localities
have we found intermediates between them.
Vernacular name', klipraap.
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE.— 3119 (Calvinia): Nieuwoudtville, Wil-
lems River Farm, (-AC), Sept, [without year], Leipoldt 789 (NBG);
Nieuwoudtville, hills near Groenrivier, (-AC), Sept, [without year],
Leipoldt 790 (NBG).
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
35
WESTERN CAPE. — 3118 (Vanrhynsdorp): Zandkraal, (-DA),
7 Sept. 1949, Barker 5648 (NBG). 3119 (Calvinia): foot of Van
Rliyn’s Pass, (-AC), 22 Aug. 1950, Barker 6447 (NBG, SAM). 3218
(Clanwilliam): intersection of Citrusdal road with Klawer-Clanwil-
liam road, (-BB), 14 Sept. 1985, Scott 25 (NBG); Olifants Dam, (—
BB), 14 Sept. 1947, Barker 4771 (NBG, SAM); Clanwilliam, near
dam, (-BB), Sept. 1947, Lewis 2400 (SAM); Botterkloof Pass SE of
Kameelberg, (-CD), 9 Sept. 1983, Oliver 8052 (NBG); Kanolvlei, (—
DD), 6 Sept. 1951, Barker 7448 (NBG). 3219 (Wuppertal): Diamond
Drift, Biedouw River between Pakhuis and Wuppertal, (-AA), Aug.
1939, Leipoldt 3114 (PRE); Biedouw Valley, 2 km along road to Doom
River, (-AA), 22 Aug. 1993, Goldblatt & Manning 9632 (MO); road
to Algeria, (-AC), 6 Sept. 1980, Le Roux 2813 (NBG). Without precise
locality'. Olifantsrivier, Dec. [without year], Zeyher s.n. SAM20551
(SAM).
7. Cyanella aquatica Oberm. ex G. Scott in South
African Journal of Botany 57: 40 (1991). Type: South
Africa, [Northern Cape], Nieuwoudtville, Kdipkoppies,
21 Sept. 1986, G. Scott 66 (NBG, holo.!; PRE, iso.!).
Plants up to 500 mm high. Corms shallow or mod-
erately deep-seated, 20 mm diam., tunics of papery or
leathery layers, not extending into neck, pale whitish
brown. Basal leaves ± 5 or 6, suberect, linear-lanceolate
or narrowly lanceolate, 200-350 x 10-15 mm, attenu-
ate, canaliculate with prominent midrib abaxially, soft-
textured, bright green, glabrous. Inflorescence a lax
raceme, up to 15-flowered, simple or with 1-3 branches
from near base, lower flowers 1. 5-3.0 x pedicel length
apart; pedicels geniculate, horizontal in basal 1/2 to 2/3
then abruptly flexed upwards at ± right angles, mostly
15-20 mm long but lowermost up to 30 mm long;
bracteoles basal or sub-basal. Flowers facing outwards,
bright orange, veined green on reverse, fragrant; tepals
spreading, outer ovate, 9-12 x 3^4 mm, recurved-apicu-
late, inner short-clawed, claw ± 1 mm long, blade ovate,
9-11 x 4-5 mm. Stamens dimorphic, 5 + 1; filaments
of posterior cluster 2. 0-2. 5 mm long, outer slightly
longer than inner, connate ± halfway or more into tube
1. 5-2.0 mm long, yellow, anthers 1. 5-2.0 mm long, yel-
low; anterior stamen with filament ± 1 mm long, connate
to upper cluster for most of length, anther ± 3 mm long,
yellow. Ovary half-inferior; style medially deflexed.
± 3 mm long, not extending beyond anthers. Capsules
erect on geniculate pedicels, subglobose, ±8x6 mm,
3-lobed and retuse. Seeds ovoid, 3.0 x 2.5 mm, rugulose.
Chromosome number. 2n = 24 (Ornduff 1979: as ‘Klip-
koppies’ population of C. hyacinthoides). Flowering
time : mid-Sept.-early Nov. Figure 61, J.
Distribution and ecology, known originally only from
the rocky outcrops immediately east of Nieuwoudtville,
inland of the edge of the Bokkeveld Escarpment,
C. aquatica has recently been collected significantly
further inland just south of Calvinia, but is still the most
local one of species in the genus (Figure 1 1). Plants are
restricted to dolerite dykes, along watercourses or drain-
age lines where the soil becomes seasonally waterlogged
during the winter months.
Diagnosis and relationships', distinguished by the
lax, sparsely branched racemes, ± basal bracteoles on
sharply sigmoid pedicels, and bright orange flowers.
Cyanella aquatica is superficially similar to C. hya-
cinthoides, which also has a 5 + 1 arrangement of sta-
mens with the filaments connate for ± half their length
or more, but which differs in its fibrous corm tunics and
dense racemes of white or pink to blue flowers with
the bracteoles usually inserted near the middle of the
pedicels or above, only rarely near the base. The two
taxa are ecologically separated, with C. hyacinthoides
favouring better drained, sandy or gritty soils. In peri-
anth colour, C. aquatica might be confused with yellow-
flowered C. lutea, but that species has suberect pedicels
with the bracteoles inserted ± midway along, filaments
that are ± free to the base, and a laterally deflexed style.
Cyanella lutea is also ecologically separated, favouring
fine-grained clay soils in renosterveld or drier karroid
vegetation.
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Niewoudtville, Klipkop-
pies, (-AC), 15 Sept. 1961, Barker 9531 (BOL, NBG, PRE); 5 Nov.
1962, Barker 9764 (NBG); trek path E of Nieuwoudtville near Cal-
vinia road, (-AC), 29 Oct. 1996, Goldblatt dt Manning 10581 A (MO);
Farm Driefontein. SW of Calvinia, SW slopes of Driefontein-se-Berg,
in watercourse among dolerite rocks, (-DA), 23 Sept. 2009, Goldblatt
& Manning 13419 (NBG, MO).
Series Luteae J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, ser. nov.
Flowers ± enantiomorphic; pedicels suberect; peri-
anth white, yellow, or pink. Stamens', filaments free,
anthers sometimes spotted or maculate. Ovaiy : style
and lower anther weakly or strongly flexed sideways in
opposite directions. Type species: Cyanella lutea L.f.
8. Cyanella lutea L.f., Supplementum plantarum: 201
(1782). Type: South Africa, without precise locality or
date, Sparrman s.n. Herb. Linn. 430.1 (LINN, holo.!).
Plants (120-) 150-350 mm high. Corms moderately
to deep-seated, 20-25 mm diam., tunics of coarsely net-
ted, fibrous, leathery or woody fibres, sometimes con-
nate below into claws, extending shortly in a neck to
30 mm long, rarely into a fibrous neck up to 100 mm
long, brown. Basal leaves 4-15 mm, suberect or spread-
ing, linear-hemiterete to lanceolate, 30-200(-250) x
2 — 1 5( — 20) mm, acute to attenuate, leathery, plane or
canaliculate, glabrous, margin smooth or ciliolate-
scabridulous. Inflorescence a moderate or dense raceme
up to 15-flowered, with 1-3 branches congested near
base, thus emerging from among leaves, rarely with
accessory branchlets and thus paniculate, lower pedicels
0.2-0. 8 x their length apart; pedicels suberect, rarely
arcuate or almost geniculate, 1 5— 30(— 50) mm long;
bracteoles mostly inserted between ± halfway and upper
third, sometimes in basal third or sub-basal. Flowers ±
36
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
enantiomorphic, facing outwards, yellow or pink to pur-
ple, usually flushed darker on reverse, with dark veins,
fragrant; tepals spreading, outer oblong-elliptic, 1 0—1 5(—
18) x 2—4 mm, apiculate, inner elliptic-ovate, 1 0—1 5( —
1 8) x 3-7 mm, acute, narrowed basally or very short-
clawed. Stamens dimorphic, 5 + 1 ; filaments of posterior
cluster 2.5 — 4.0 mm long, connate only at extreme base,
± linear, yellow, anthers 2—4 mm long, yellow, usually
finely spotted black or maroon; anterior stamen with fil-
ament deflexed ± laterally, 4-5 mm long, linear, connate
to upper cluster at extreme base only, anther 4-7 mm
long, thus ± twice as large as upper, yellow, brown, or
mauve. Ovary half inferior; style ± laterally deflexed to
left or right opposite lower stamen, 6-10 mm long, not
FIGURE 12. — Cyanella lutea: A, flowering plant; B, half-flower; C,
capsule; D, seed. Scale bar: A-C, 10 mm; D, 2 mm. Artist: John
Manning.
extending beyond lower anther. Capsules erect, sub-
globose-retuse, 6-8 mm diam., 3-lobed. Seeds ovoid,
± 2 mm diam.. rugulose. Chromosome number. 2n = 24
(subsp. lutea : Omduff 1979). Flowering time : mainly
Aug.-Nov. Figures 6K, L; 12.
Distribution and ecologyn the most widely distributed
species in the genus, C. lutea , extends through the win-
ter rainfall region of southern Namibia and South Africa
and around the interior margin of the central plateau but
is absent from the central and Great Karoo (Figure 13).
Pink-flowered plants, often with narrower leaves,
have been distinguished taxonomically several times,
but differ consistently from the typical yellow-flowered
form only in perianth colour. Baker (1871) initially rec-
ognized var. rosea from the Eastern Cape but subse-
quently (Baker 1880) changed his mind. This decision
was followed by Scott (1991). However, the two colour
morphs are geographically segregated: pink-flowered
plants are recorded from the edges of the winter rainfall
region into interior southern Africa, typically in sandy
soils; and yellow-flowered plants are restricted to the
southwestern Cape and nearby, on clay soils. We accord-
ingly treat them here as distinct subspecies.
Diagnosis and relationships : distinguished from other
members of sect. Cyanella by its racemes of pink or yel-
low, ± enantiostylous flowers with almost free filaments,
connate only at the extreme base, and the lower anther
± twice as large as the upper anthers. Yellow-flowered
plants are readily recognized by their colour but pink-
flowered plants could be confused with C. hyacinthoides
around Springbok in Namaqualand, where both occur.
Cyanella hyacinthoides is recognized by its partially
connate upper filament cluster, with the lower anther
mostly less than twice as long as the upper, and by its
spreading-geniculate pedicels. Subspecies rosea has also
been confused with C. ramosissima (sect. Trigella ), but
the arrangement of the stamens is quite different in the
two species.
Key to subspecies
la Leaves mostly lanceolate, (2— )5— 1 5(— 20) mm wide; perianth
pale to golden yellow, rarely orange, often flushed reddish
on reverse; plants from southwestern Cape, from Nieu-
woudtville to Uitenhage 8a. subsp. lutea
lb Leaves linear to linear-lanceolate, 2—1 0(— 1 2 ) mm wide; peri-
160 18° 20" 22° 24° 26° 28°
FIGURE 13. — Distribution of Cyanella lutea subsp. lutea, •; C. lutea
subsp. rosea, o.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
37
antli pink to purple; plants from southern Namibia and
northern Namaqualand across interior of South Africa into
Eastern Cape as far as Humansdorp 8b. subsp. rosea
8a. subsp. lutea
C. racemosa Schinz: 394 (1895). Type: South Africa,
[Western Cape], in arenosis [sandy] Camp Ground pro-
pre [proper]. Cape Town, 12 June 1892, Schlechter 839
(Z, holo.; PRE, iso.!).
C. lutea forma angustior Zahlbr.: 27 (1900). Type:
South Africa, [Western Cape], Caledon, Oct. [without
year], Penther 494 (W, holo.f).
Leaves 4-10, mostly lanceolate, rarely linear, (2-)5—
1 5(— 20) mm wide. Flowers pale to golden yellow, often
flushed reddish on reverse or tinged orange.
Distribution: endemic to winter rainfall South Africa,
where it has been recorded from the Bokkeveld Escarp-
ment and southern Roggeveld to the Cape Flats and
Bredasdorp in the south and eastwards through the Lit-
tle Karoo to Uitenhage. The subspecies is essentially
restricted to renosterveld shrubland on fine-grained clay
or laterite soils, rarely on stony limestone flats.
Diagnosis: recognized by the yellow perianth, often
flushed reddish on the reverse and thus with an orange
tinge, and the typically lanceolate leaves, mostly 5 — 1 5( —
20) mm wide, rarely narrower and grass-like. Flower-
ing time: mainly Sept.-Oct. but to Nov. in the southern
Cape.
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3119 (Calvinia): Nieuwoudtville Reserve,
(-AC), 12 Oct. 1983, Perry & Snijman 2372 (NBG, PRE); Oor-
logskloof Nature Reserve, 15 km SW of Nieuwoudtville, (-AC), 14
Oct. 1996, Pretorius 388 (NBG); Lokenburg, (-AC), 23 Aug. 1980,
Van Berkel 207 (MO). 3220 (Sutherland): Roggeveld Escarpment,
Ouberg Pass, (-AD), 6 Sept. 2006, Rosch HR538 (NBG); Sutherland,
Houthoek, (-CA), 13 Sept. 1971, Hanekom 1575 (PRE); Koedoesberg,
(-CC), 1 Sept. 1973, Oliver 4378 (NBG).
WESTERN CAPE-3218 (Clanwilliam): Farm Nurust, about 8
miles [13 km] N of Porterville, (-DD), 22 Sept. 1966, Loubser 2107
(NBG). 3318 (Cape Town): Bobbejaanberg above Groene Kloof
[near Mamre], (-AD), Oct., Ecklon & Zeyher 269 (MO); N of Tiger-
berg [Tygerberg], (-CC), 20 Sept. 1947, Barker 4808 (NBG); Stel-
lenbosch, Elsenburg, (DD), 5 Oct. 1938, Penfold 153 (NBG). 3319
(Worcester): Saron, (-AA), Oct. 1896, Schlechter 10633 (MO); Tul-
bagh, (-AC), Oct. 1920, Marloth 9939 (NBG); 5 miles [8 km] from
Ceres at bottom of Theron’s Pass, (-AD), 11 Nov. 1974, Snijman 9
(NBG); Karoopoort, (-BA), 26 Sept. 1944, Compton 16054 (NBG);
Tanqua Karoo, near Bloukop, (-BD), 22 Sept. 1975, Thompson 2549
(NBG); Karoo Garden, Worcester, (-CB), 11 Sept. 1969, Tarr s.n.
(NBG); Worcester, Langerug Koppie, (-CB), 23 Sept. 1974, Walters
1207 (NBG); Rooihoogte Pass, (-DB), 28 Oct. 1980, Mauve, Reid &
Wikner 197 (NBG). 3320 (Montagu): Laingsburg, Cabidu, (-AB), 28
Sept. 1951, Compton 22890 (NBG); Whitehill, (-BA), 20 Sept. 1943,
Compton 14874 (NBG); S of Ashton, (-CC), 21 Sept. 1941, Barker
2032 (NBG); 14 km E of Montagu, Klipheuwel Farm. (-CC), 16 Oct.
1998, Manning 2195 (NBG). 3321 (Ladismith): Vleiland, N of Klein
Swartberge, (-AC), 10 Oct. 1976, Thompson 3183 (NBG); road to
Waterkloof NW of Ladismith, (-AD), 23 Oct. 1980, Mauve, Reid &
Wikner 105 (NBG); S side of Rooiberg, (-CB), 22 Nov. 1983, Mauve,
Van Wyk & Pare 40 (NBG); Van Wyksdorp, (-DA), 12 Sept. 1983,
Bohnen 8297 (NBG). 3322 (Oudtshoom): Prince Albert route 407
to Klaarstroom, Farm Welgelegen, (-AC), 1 Sept. 2006, Roux 4199
(NBG); George Forest, (-CD), 25 Nov. 1950, Martin 638 (NBG); De
Rust, Ostekloof Farm, (-DA), 28 Sept. 1971, Dahlstrand 2088 (MO,
PRE); Knysna, Barrington, (-DD), 14 Nov. 1949, Barker 6068 (NBG).
3419 (Caledon): Kogelberg State Forest, Remhoogte, (-AA), 25 Oct.
1984, Brits 23 (NBG); Greyton, (-BA), 21 Oct. 1967, Bayliss 4019
(MO, NBG); 5 miles [8 km] NW of Riviersonderend, (-BB), 17 Sept.
1949, Heginbotham 83 (NBG); Swellendam to Stormsvlei, (- BB), 3
Oct. 1974, Goldblatt 2924 (MO); slopes of Kleinberg, ± 3 km NW of
Napier, (-BD), 19 Oct. 1976, Thompson 3206 (NBG, PRE); ± 15 km
NW of Napier, Fairfield Farm, (-BD), 3 Oct. 1994, Kemper IPC644
(NBG); Bredasdorp, Bosheuwel, (-BD), 6 Oct. 1982, Cowling 1882
(NBG). 3420 (Bredasdorp): Kathoek Farm, 30 km E of Bredasdorp,
(-AD), 11 Oct. 1981, Mauve & Hugo 140 (NBG); De Hoop, Potberg
Nature Reserve, (-AD), 12 Oct. 1978, Burgers 1276 (NBG); Swellen-
dam, Bontebok Park, (-AB), 20 Sept. 1965, Grobler 490 (NBG);
Struisbaai, ± 5 km on Bredasdorp road, (-CC), 26 Oct. 1 987, Felling-
ham 1366 (NBG). 3421 (Riversdale): Blombos Road, 8-10 km S of
Riversdale, (-AA), 11 Oct. 1993, Goldblatt & Manning 9792 (NBG);
Reisiesbaan siding, (-AB), 31 Oct. 1979, Bohnen 7051 (NBG); Still
Bay, (-AD), 16 Oct. 1978, Bohnen 4463 (NBG). 3422 (Mossel Bay):
Great Brak, (-AA), 21 Sept. 1959, Lewis 5601 (NBG). 3423 (Knysna):
Plettenberg Bay, (-AB), 21 Nov. 1953, Taylor 4320 (NBG).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3323 (Willowmore): flats between Hotsprings
and Toorwater, (-AC), 5 Oct. 1971, Oliver 3646 (NBG, PRE); Vled-
ermuis area between Fullerton & Heuningklip, (-BA), 14 Sept. 1973,
Oliver 4582 (NBG); Baviaanskloof, Adamskraal, (-BC), 22 Oct.
1999, Desmet 2095 (NBG); Bellvue, ± 4 km from Avontuur, (-CC),
11 Nov. 1978, Botha 2188 (PRE); Suuranysberge, Voelkraal Farm, (—
CC), 1 Oct. 1984, Stirton 10903 (NBG). 3324 (Steytlerville): Kruis-
rivier-Hankey Dist., (-CB), [without date], Manson 297 (NBG); poort
between Patensie and Cambria, (-DA), 11 Sept. 1973, Thompson 1885
(NBG).
8b. subsp. rosea (Eckl. ex Baker) J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt , stat. nov. Cyanella lutea var. rosea Eckl.
ex Baker: t. 259 (1871). Type: South Africa, [Eastern
Cape], Queenstown, 1860, T. Cooper 270 (K, holo.!).
Note: Scott ( 1991 ) was of the opinion that no material
of Cooper’s collection had been preserved and thus lec-
totypified the name against the illustration in Refugium
Botanicum , which was drawn from plants collected and
cultivated by Thomas Cooper. There exists, however, a
specimen at Kew, collected by Cooper in 1 860 at Queen-
stown in the Eastern Cape where this form has since
been re-collected, and labelled with the name Cyanella
rosea. There seems no reason to doubt that it represents
the original collection from which the cultivated plants
were derived. This material, as the holotype, takes prec-
edence over the illustration (McNeil et al. 2006: Art.
9.10 & 9.17). Baker’s (1871 ) citation of the Ecklon man-
uscript name, Cyanella rosea Eckl., which appeared as
a printed label on some herbarium collections, including
Ecklon 255 (NBG), is a clear indication that the correct
author citation for the epithet is Eckl. ex Baker.
C. lineata Burch.: 589 (1812). Type: South Africa,
Bechuanaland [Northern Cape], near Moshowa [Mosha-
weng] River, without exact date [1811-1812], Burchell
2256-2 ( K, holo.!).
C. odoratissima Ker Gawk: t. 1111 (1827). Type:
South Africa, Cape of Good Hope, without precise local-
ity, date or collector, cultivated in Tate’s nursery, Lon-
don, apparently not preserved, illustration in Ker Gawk,
The Botanical Register 13: t. 1111 (1827). [Note: Scott’s
(1991) attribution of the name to Lindley is incorrect, as
John Bellenden Ker [-Gawler] wrote the text for the first
14 volumes (Stafleu & Cowan 1976), and John Lindley
only assumed authorship from vol. 15].
C. lutea var. angustifolia Schinz: 48 (1896). Type:
Namibia, Oas [Huib-Hoch Plateau], Oct. 1891, Fleck
232 (Z, holo.!).
Leaves 6-12, linear-hemiterete to linear-lanceolate.
38
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
2—1 0(— 1 2) mm wide. Flowers pale to deep pink or pur-
ple. Flowering time : mainly Aug.-Sept. in Namaqualand
and Bushmanland; Oct.-Dec. in the interior and Eastern
Cape.
Distribution', recorded from central Namaqualand
around Springbok and the Huib-Hoch Plateau in south-
ern Namibia, inland through Bushmanland along the
Orange and Vaal Rivers as far as Kuruman in North-
ern Cape and Smithfield in the southern Free State,
thence southwards through the eastern Upper Karoo to
Humansdorp (Figure 13). Plants have been recorded
mainly from sandy, sometimes calcareous, flats in
Nama-Karoo shrubland or drier grassland, in the Kuru-
man area typically beneath small bushes. The subspecies
is relatively poorly documented for such a large range.
Diagnosis : distinguished by its generally narrower,
often grass-like leaves 2-12 mm wide, and its pink
perianth. Plants from Namaqualand-Bushmanland and
southern Namibia are especially distinctive in their very
small stature, numerous, semi-terete leaves, and ± con-
gested inflorescence branching near the base, giving
them a characteristic caespitose appearance.
Representative specimens
FREE STATE. — 3026 (Aliwal North): Smithfield, (-BA), Oct.
[without year or collector], STE12787 (NBG).
NORTHERN CAPE.— 2623 (Morokweng): Vryburg, (-DB), Sept.
1924, Henrici 160 (PRE). 2723 (Kuruman): 36 miles [57.6 km] E-NE
of Van Zylsrus, 2 miles [3 km] N of Kuruman River on Tsabong road,
(-AD), 17 Oct. 1961. Leistner 2886 (PRE). 2818 (Warmbad): 2 miles
[3 km] S of Goodhouse, (-DD), 27 July 1950, Lewis 3003 (SAM),
63739 (PRE); Goodhouse, (-BD), 27 July 1950, Barker 6262 (NBG).
2819 (Ariamsvlei): Augrabies, (-DB), 21 Aug. 1954, Compton 24474
(NBG); Augrabies Falls National Park, (-DB), 22 Aug. 2005, Steyn
759 (NBG, PRE). 2820 (Kakamas); 12 miles [19 km] E of Kakamas,
(-DB), 28 Aug. 1963, Hardy & Rauh 1560 (PRE). 2823 (Griekwa-
stad): Brakfontein, (-CD), 20 Sept. 1988, Saaiman 227 (PRE). 2824
(Kimberley): Kuruman River 16 miles [25.6 km] W of Kuruman-
Gordonia boundary, (-BA), 18 Oct. 1961, Leistner 2893 (PRE). 2917
(Springbok): along Goodhouse road, (-BD), 20 Sept. 1980, Van Ber-
kel 260 (NBG); near Springbok, (-DD), Sept. 1939, Lewis 750 (SAM);
Droedap [SE of Springbok], (-DD), 27 Aug. 1941, Barker 2029
(NBG). 2918 (Gamoep): Aggenys, (-BD), 13 Oct. 1971, Wisura 2264
(NBG). 2922 (Prieska): Prieska, (-DA), [without date], Biyant s.n.
PRE38351 (PRE). 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Theunis se Dam, 36 km S
of Little Rock Caravan Park on Droedap road, (-BB), 25 Aug. 1977,
Thompson & le Roux 37 (NBG); Droedap, (-BB), 27 Aug. 1941,
Esterhuysen 5894 (PRE). 3023 (Britstown): De Aar. (-DB), 30 Aug.
1895, Solly s.n. PRE38315 (PRE). 3024 (De Aar), Rolfontein Nature
Reserve, Springbok Flats, (-BB), 9 Sept. 1982, Coetzee s.n. PRE61030
(PRE).
WESTERN CAPE. — 3223 (Rietbron): 20 km from Farm Riet-
bron on road to Murraysburg, (-BA), 13 Oct. 1983, Relief & Reid 521
(PRE).
EASTERN CAPE. — 3126 (Queenstown): lower slopes, (-DD),
1893, Galpin 1568 (PRE). 3127 (Lady Frere): Little Bushy near
Cala, (-DA), Dec. 1910, Royffe s.n. TM25721 (PRE). 3225 (Somer-
set East): Mountain Zebra National Park, (-AD), 4 Oct. 1 979, Du Toil
155 (PRE); Addo National Park, (-BC), Nov. 1962, Liebenberg 6620
(PRE). 3226 (Fort Beaufort); Bushman’s River Mouth, (-DB), 2 Dec.
1941, Barker 2034 (NBG). 3227 (Stutterheim): Queenstown, Bram
Neck, (-AA), 28 Oct. 1946, Thorns s.n. (NBG); between Fish River
and Governor’s Kop, (-BD), 16 Oct. 1961, Batten 1-P1.83 (NBG).
3325 (Port Elizabeth): Kommadagga, (-BB), 27 Nov. 1973, Bayliss
6199 (MO); Vanstadensberg, (-CC), Dec. [without year], MacOwan
1086 (SAM); near Zwartkop River, (-DC), Nov. [without year], Eck-
lon 255 (NBG, SAM). 3424 (Humansdorp): Humansdorp, (-BB), 14
Oct. 1928, Gillen 2397 (NBG).
9. Cyanella alba L.f, Supplementum plantarum: 201
(1782). Pharetrella alba (L.f.) Salisb.: 47 (1866). Type:
South Africa, without precise locality or date, Thunberg
s.n. Herb. Linn. 430.4 [LINN, lecto.!, designated by
Scott: 46 ( 1991 )].
Plants 80-200 mm high. Conns deep-seated, 15—
25 mm diam., tunics of coarsely netted fibres, extend-
ing into neck up to 50 mm long, pale brown. Basal
leaves ± 10-20, erect, filiform to linear, (40-)50-100 x
0. 5-3.0 mm, attenuate, leathery, bright green, glabrous.
Inflorescence a highly congested, simple raceme such
that flowers apparently solitary among leaves; pedicels
suberect, (80-) 100-200 mm long; bracteoles either sub-
basal or inserted in upper half. Flowers enantiomorphic,
facing outwards, white or pale pink or pale yellow, fra-
grant; tepals spreading, cucculate, outer elliptic, 12-20
x 5-7 mm, recurved-apiculate, inner ovate, 12-20 x
7 — 12(— 1 5) mm, acute, narrowed basally or short-clawed,
claw up to 1 mm long. Stamens weakly dimorphic or
submonomorphic, 5 + 1; filaments of posterior clus-
ter 3-5 mm long, connate only at extreme base, awl-
shaped, white, anthers 3. 5-5. 5 mm long, yellow, some-
times marked with black spot on upper surface near
base, sometimes cohering; anterior stamen with filament
deflexed laterally, 3-4 mm long, awl-shaped, connate
to upper cluster at extreme base, anther 4-6 mm long,
yellow. Ovary half-inferior; style laterally deflexed
opposite lower stamen, 7-9 mm long, not extending
beyond lower anther. Capsules erect, ellipsoid, 13-15 x
7-8 mm, 3-lobed. Seeds ovoid, ± 2 mm diam., rugulose.
Chromosome number. 2n = 24 (subsp. flavescens: Orn-
duff 1979). Flowering time : (late Aug.-)mid-Sept.-mid-
Oct.(Nov.). Figures 6M, N; 14.
Distribution and ecology, the species has a scattered
distribution along the western mountains in Western
Cape, where it is known from the Bokkeveld Escarp-
ment, the Cedarberg and Olifants River Mtns, and the
base of the Swartruggens (Figure 15). These three areas
of occurrence correspond to the distribution of the three
subspecies that we recognize. Cyanella alba is restricted
to clay soils in renosterveld shrubland.
Diagnosis and relationships', one of the easiest spe-
cies to identify on account of its highly congested inflo-
rescence axis with extremely elongate pedicels, the
flowers thus apparently borne on 1 -flowered peduncles
rather than in a raceme. The raceme is never branched,
and up to a maximum of nine flowers are produced,
thus very much fewer than in other species. The flow-
ers are strongly enantiostylous, and either white to pale
pink with uniformly yellow anthers, or pale yellow with
maculate anthers. These colour morphs, which are geo-
graphically segregated, correlate with the position of
the bracteole on the pedicels, and we recognize them as
three subspecies. The large, ellipsoid capsule, 13-15 mm
long, is unique in sect. Cyanella, resembling those of
C. cygnea and C. orchidiformis in sect. Trigel/a.
Key to subspecies
la Leaves filiform, 0.5-1. 5 mm diam.; flowers white; bracteoles
subbasal, not readily visible among leaves and thus appar-
ently absent 9c. subsp. minor
lb Leaves linear-filiform, 1-3 mm wide; flowers white or yel-
low; bracteoles inserted in distal half of pedicel, thus
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 14. — Cyanella alba : A, subsp. alba , showing distal bracteole;
B. subsp. minor, showing subbasal bracteole. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Artist: John Manning.
clearly present:
2a Flowers 3-9 per plant, white or pale pink; anthers uni-
formly yellow 9a. subsp. alba
2b Flowers 1-4 per plant, pale yellow or outer tepals white;
upper anthers marked with black blotch adaxially near
base 9b. subsp. flavescens
9a. subsp. alba
Plants (80-) 100-200 mm high. Leaves linear,
1-3 mm wide. Inflorescence 3-9-flowered; pedicels with
bracteole in distal half. Flowers white to pale pink. Sta-
mens: anthers uniformly yellow. Figure 14A.
Distribution : endemic to the Bokkeveld Escarpment,
from just north of Nieuwoudtville southward to Men-
zieskraal near Botterkloof (Figure 15).
Diagnosis: characterized by the long pedicels, (80-
) 100-200 mm long, with the bracteole inserted between
one third and three-quarters along, and white or pale
39
pink flowers flushed darker pink on the reverse. The
anthers are uniformly yellow, with the upper cluster free
or coherent. Plants are often well grown, producing 3-9
flowers. The position of the bracteoles in the distal half
of the pedicels distinguishes subsp. alba from subsp.
minor from the Tanqua Basin to the south, which has
similar flowers but subbasal bracteoles.
Representative specimens
NORTHERN CAPE.— 3119 (Calvinia): N of Nieu-
woudtville, Grasberg Farm, (-AC), 16 Sept. 1961,
Barker 9457 (NBG); Nieuwoudtville Reserve, (-AC), 8
Sept. 1983, Perry & Snijman 2351 (NBG); ± 15 km S of
Nieuwoudtville, Matjiesfontein Farm, (-AC), 13 Sept.
1976, Thompson 2902 (NBG); Lokenberg Farm, (-CA),
26 Sept. 1933, Acocks 17263 (PRE); 4 Sept. 1985, Snij-
man 905 (NBG); Menzieskraal Farm, (-CA), 29 Sept.
1933, Markotter s.n. (NBG).
9b. subsp. flavescens J.C. Manning in Manning et al.
in Bothalia 35: 119 (2005). Type: South Africa, West-
ern Cape, Biedouwberg, 26 Aug. 1 896, Schlechter 8686
(SAM, holo.!, BOL!, PRE!, iso.).
Plants 120-200 mm high. Leaves linear-filiform,
1-2 mm wide. Inflorescence I -4-flowered; pedicels
with bracteole in distal 1/2. Flowers pale yellow or outer
tepals white. Stamens: anthers yellow, upper five coher-
ent and maculate with dark blotch on upper side near
base.
Distribution: restricted to the northern Cedarberg and
Olifants River Valley, between Clanwilliam and Wup-
pertal, and especially common in the Biedouw River
Valley (Figure 1 5).
Diagnosis: a very distinctive taxon recognized by its
pale yellow flowers (sometimes the outer tepals white)
with the upper anthers coherent and marked on the upper
side with a black blotch near the base. Up to four flow-
ers are produced per plant.
Representative specimens
WESTERN CAPE. — 3218 (Clanwilliam): Clanwilliam, (-BB), 4
Aug. 1896, Schlechter 8405 (BOL, PRE); 10 km S of Clanwilliam, (—
BB), 12 Sept. 1997, Goldblatt & Manning 10741 (MO, NBG). 3219
(Wuppertal): Biedouw Mtn, (-AA), 20 Sept. 1937, Lewis s.n. (NBG);
bottom of hill to Biedouw Valley, (-AA), 9 Aug. 1984, Perry 3145
FIGURE 15. — Distribution of Cyanella alba subsp. alba, •; subsp. fla-
vescens, o; subsp. minor, A .
40
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
(NBG); Farm Welbedacht, (-AA), 20 Sept. 1937, Barker 283 (NBG);
Koudeberg near Wuppertal, (-AA), 4 Oct. 1897, Bolus 9095 (NBG);
Citadel Kop, (-AA), 7 Sept. 1953, Compton 24237 (NBG); near Wup-
pertal, (-AA), 28 Aug. 1951, Martin 811 (NBG).
9c. subsp. minor J.C. Manning in Manning el al. in
Bothalia 35: 119 (2005). Type: South Africa, Western
Cape, Karoopoort, 27 Sept. 1944, Barker 3024 (NBG,
holo.!).
Plants 80-150 mm high. Leaves filiform, 0.5-1. 5 mm
wide. Inflorescence 1-3-flowered; pedicels with bracte-
ole subbasal. Flowers white to pale pink with darker
pink on reverse. Stamens: anthers uniformly yellow. Fig-
ure 14B.
Distribution : highly localized and known only from
just north of Karoopoort in the southern Tanqua Karoo
basin (Figure 15).
Diagnosis : distinguished from the typical subspecies,
which has similar white or pale pink flowers and uni-
formly yellow anthers, by the shorter pedicels, mostly
< 100 mm (rarely up to 150 mm long) with the bracte-
oles sub-basal and thus difficult to distinguish from the
leaves. This led Manning et al. (2005) to conclude that
bracteoles were absent, and we were only able to estab-
lish the true situation after having the opportunity of dis-
secting live plants. The plants are typically small in stat-
ure, with only 1-3 flowers per plant.
Representative specimens
WESTERN CAPE. — 3319 (Worcester): Karoopoort, (-BA), 19
Sept. 1938, Levyns 6236 (BOL); Tanqua Karoo N of Karoopoort, (—
BA), 9 Sept. 2007, Goldblatt <6 Porter 12970 (NBG); 13 Sept. 2009,
Goldblatt, Manning & Porter 12970 (MO, NBG).
EXCLUDED SPECIES
Walleria paniculata Fritsch: 493 ( 1896). Type: Mada-
gascar, Ins. St Marie, without date, Paulay s.n. (GZU,
holo.) = Dianella ensifolia (L.) DC. (Hemerocalli-
daceae) (Perrier de la Bathie 1938).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our sincere thanks to Anne-Lise Fourie, Flead Librar-
ian at the South African National Biodiversity Institute,
and Mary Stiffler, Research Librarian at the Missouri
Botanical Garden, for their assistance in locating nec-
essary references. This is the last of our contributions
edited by Beverley Momberg before her retirement, and
we are deeply grateful to her for her years of sterling
service.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1871 ‘1 870’. Cyanella lutea var. rosea. Refugium botani-
cum 4: t. 259.
BAKER, J.G. 1 878 ‘ 1 880’. Report on the Liliaceae, Iridaceae, Hypoxi-
daceae, and Haemodoraceae of Welwitsch’s Angolan Herbar-
ium. Transactions of the Linnean Society, Botany 1 : 245-273.
BAKER, J.G. 1879. A synopsis of Colchicaceae and the aberrant tribes
of Liliaceae. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 17: 405-
510.
BROWN, N.E. 1909. List of plants collected in Ngamiland and the
northern part of the Kalahari Desert. Bulletin of Miscellaneous
Information, Kew 1909: 89-146.
BRUMMITT, R.K.. BANKS, H„ JOHNSON, M.A.T., DOCHERTY,
K.A., JONES, K„ CHASE, M.W. & RIDALL, P.J. 1998. Tax-
onomy of Cynastroideae (Tecophilaeaceae): a multidisciplinary
approach. Kew Bulletin 53: 769-803.
BURCHELL, W.J. 1812. Travels in the interior of southern Africa.
Batchworth, London.
CARTER, S. 1962. Revision of Walleria and Cyanastrum (Tecophilae-
aceae). Kew Bulletin 16: 185-195.
COWLEY, E.J. & BRUMMITT, R.K. 2001. Tecophilaeaceae. In G.V.
Pop e. Flora zambesiaca 12, 3: 18—25.
DAMMER, C.L.U. 1912. Liliaceae africanae IV. Botanische Jahrbuch-
erfiir Systematik 48: 360-366.
DE WILDEMAN, E. 1915. Decades novarum specierum florae congo-
lensis XVI. Bulletin du Jardin de I’Etat a Bruxelles 5: 3—8.
D1NTER, M.K. & SCHULTZE, G.M. 1941. Neue Amaryllidaceen aus
Deutsch-Siidwest-Afrika. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Svstematik
71: 520-525.
DYER. R.A. 1960. Walleria nutans. Flowering Plants of Africa 34: t.
1321.
ENGLER, A. & KRAUSE, K. 1910. Lilaceae africanae 2. Botanische
Jahrbucher fur Systematik 45 : 123-155.
FRITSCH, K. 1896. Zur Flora von Madagascar. Annalen des K.K.
Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums, Wien 5: 492^194.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 1989. Chromosome number in
Walleria (Tecophilaeaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 76: 925, 926.
HEYWOOD, V.H., BRUMMITT, R.K., CULHAM, A. & SEBARG,
O. 2007. Flowering plant families of the world. Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index Herbariorum, par. 1 : the herbaria of the World. New York
Botanical Garden, New York.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1776—1777. Hortus botanicus vindobonensis 3. Wap-
pler, Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1786-1793. leones plantarum rariorum 2. Wappler,
Vienna.
JACQUIN, N.J. 1791 [' 1790']. Collectanea 4. Wappler, Vienna.
KRAUSE, K. 1921 Liliaceae africanae 6. Botanische Jahrbucher fur
Systematik 57: 235-239.
KER GAWLER, J.B. 1 827. Cyanella odoratissima. The Botanical Reg-
ister 1 3: t. 1111. Ridgway, London.
KIRK, J. 1864. On a new genus of Liliaceae from East tropical Africa.
Transactions of the Linnean Society 24: 497- 499.
LEFFERS, A. 2008. Gemsbok Bean and Kalahari Truffle. Macmillan
Education Namibia. Windhoek.
LINNAEUS, C. 1754. Genera plantarum, edn 5. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. 1759. Svstema naturae , edn 10. Salvius, Stockholm.
LINNAEUS, C. (fil.). 1782 [‘1781’]. Supplementum plantarum. Braun-
schweig, Uppsala.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2007. Trachyandra arenicola
and T. montana (Asphodelaceae), two new species from South
Africa. Bothalia 37: 26-31.
MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P. & BATTEN, A. 2001. Walleria
gracilis. Flowering Plants of Africa 57: 44-47.
MANNING, J.C., FOREST. F. & MANNHE1MER, C.A. 2005. Eremio-
lirion, a new genus of southern African Tecophilaeaceae, and
taxonomic notes on Cyanella alba. Bothalia 35: 115-120.
McNEILL, J„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H..
PRADO, J„ SILVA, PC., SKOG, J.E., WIERSMA, J.H. & TUR-
LAND, N.J. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomencla-
ture (Vienna Code) adopted by the seventeenth International
Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Gantner, Liech-
tenstein. [Regnum Vegetabile 146],
ORNDUFF, R. 1979. Chromosome numbers in Cyanella (Tecophilae-
aceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 581-583.
PAX, F. & HOFFMANN, K. 1930. Amaryllidaceae. In A. Engler & K.
Prantl, Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien , edn 2, 15a: 39 1 — 430.
Engelman, Leipzig.
PERRIER DE LA BATHIE, H. 1938. Liliacees. In H. Humbert, Flore
de Madagascar. Gouvemement General de Madagascar, Tanan-
arive.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants.
Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 25. Depart-
ment of Agriculture, Pretoria.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1 796. Prodromus stirpium in horto ad Chapel Aller-
ton vigentium. Hooker, London.
SALISBURY, R.A. 1866. The genera of plants. Van Voorst, London.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
41
SCHINZ, H. 1895. Beitrage zur K.enntnis der alrikanischen Flora 111.
Amaryllidaceae. Bulletin de l Herbier Boissier 3, ser. 1 : 394, 395.
SCHINZ, H. 1896. Die Pflanzenwelt Deutsch-Sudwest-Afrikas. Bulle-
tin de I 'Herbier Boissier 4, ser. l,App. Ill: 1-57.
SCHINZ, FI. 1902. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der alrikanischen Flora XIV.
Haemodoraceae. Bulletin de I 'Herbier Boissier 2, ser. 2: 943, 944.
SCOTT, G. 1991. A revision of Cyanella (Tecophilaeaeceae) excluding
C. amboensis. South African Journal of Botany 57: 34-54.
SIMPSON, M.G. & RUDALL, P.J. 1998. Tecophilaeaceae. In K.
Kubitzki, The families and genera of vascular plants III. Flow-
ering plants — monocotyledons: 429^436.
SNIJMAN, D. 1984. A revision of the genus Haemanthus L. (Ama-
ryllidaceae). Journal of South African Botany , Suppl. vol. 12.
National Botanical Gardens, Cape Town.
STAFLEU, F.A. & COWAN, R.S. 1976. Taxonomic literature 1: A-G.
Bonn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht.
ZAHLBRUCKNER, A. 1902. Plantae pentherianae. Annalen des kai-
serlichen naturhistorischen Museums 15: 1-73, t. I-IV.
Bothalia 42,1:43-66 (2012)
Notes on African plants
VARIOUS AUTHORS
HYACINTHACEAE
DRIM1A ECHINOSTACHYA, CORRECTING A NOMENCLATURAL OVERSIGHT
Crouch et al. (2010) reassessed the distribution and
correct identification of a bulb species recently noted in
the ethnomedicinal plant trade in KwaZulu-Natal. They
used the name Drimia cooperi (Baker) Baker, following
Jessop (1977) and subsequent checklist citations (Reid
1993; Manning & Goldblatt 2003, 2006).
Subsequently, it was discovered that this name is an
illegitimate later homonym (McNeill et al. 2006: Art.
53.1) of Drimia cooperi Baker (1868), which is regarded
as a synonym of Ledebouria concolor (Baker) Jessop
by Jessop (1970). The name Drimia cooperi (Baker)
Bentham ex Baker was actually the combination for
Ornithogalum cooperi Baker (1873) made by Baker
(1897). Transfer of the epithet cooperi to the genus
Drimia is illegitimate because the resulting combination
is preoccupied by Drimia cooperi Baker ( 1868). Accord-
ing to the rules of Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill
et al. 2006), the next earliest available epithet must be
used. Crouch et al. (2010) determined that the holotype
of Urginea echinostachya Baker (1897) is conspecific
with Ornithogalum cooperi Baker (1873), and Urginea
echinostachya Baker is therefore the next earliest avail-
able name for the species. The necessary transfer to the
genus Drimia is published below. In the past, D. echi-
nostachya was regarded as a synonym of D. macrocen-
tra (Baker) Jessop (Jessop 1977), despite the conspicu-
ous morphological differences (Crouch et al. 2010).
An argument could be raised concerning the correct
place of transfer of Ornithogalum cooperi Baker (1873)
to Drimia : Baker (1897) attributed the new combination
for this taxon to Bentham (in Bentham & Hooker 1883).
However, consideration of Bentham & Hooker (1883)
reveals that Bentham did not actually use the name
Drimia cooperi , but simply remarked that Ornithoga-
lum cooperi Baker appeared to belong to Drimia. This
cannot be interpreted as a valid combination under the
present nomenclatural rules (McNeill et al. 2006: Art.
33.1, Ex. 2). Herbarium acronyms follow Holmgren et.
al. (1990).
Drimia echinostachya (Baker) Eggli & N.R. Crouch,
comb. nov. Urginea echinostachya Baker, Flora capen-
sis 6: 468 (1897). Type: Natal [KwaZulu-Natal], Inanda,
J.M. Wood 276 (K, holo.l; NH, iso!).
Ornithogalum cooperi Baker: 284 (1873), syn. nov.;
Bentham: 808 (1883). Drimia cooperi (Baker) Bentham
ex Baker: 443 (1897), nom. inval. (Art. 33.1) et illegit.
(Art. 53.1), non D. cooperi Baker: t. 18 (1868) [= Lede-
bouria concolor (Baker) Jessop]. Type: Cape [Eastern
Cape], ‘ad oram orientalis’, Barber s.n. (TCD, lecto.,
designated by Jessop: 287 (1977);-K, photo.!).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The staff of the Mary Gunn Library (South African
National Botanical Institute (SANBI), Pretoria) facili-
tated access to literature, and Dr H. Glen (SANBI) is
thanked for helpful discussions and Latin translations.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1 868. Drimia cooperi. Saunders Refugium Bolanicum 1 :
t. 18.
BAKER, J.G. 1873. Revision of the genera and species of Scilleae
and Chlorogaleae. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 13:
209-292.
BAKER, J.G. 1897. Order CXXXVII. Liliaceae. Flora capensis 6:
253-528. Reeve, London.
BENTHAM, G. & HOOKER, J.D. 1 883. Genera plantarum, vol. 3, part
2. Reeve, London.
CROUCH, N.R., WILLIAMS, V.L., EDWARDS, T.J. & BRUETON,
V.J. 2010. Hyacinthaceae. Drimia cooperi in KwaZulu-Natal,
and the ethnomedicinal trade. Bothalia 40: 75-78.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part 1: The herbaria of the world , edn 8.
New York Botanical Garden. New York.
JESSOR J.P. 1970. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae: 1. Scilla. Schizo-
carphus and Ledebouria. Journal of South African Botany 36:
233-266.
JESSOP, J.P. 1977. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 7.
The taxonomy of Drimia and certain allied genera. Journal of
South African Botany 43: 265-3 1 9.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2003. Hyacinthaceae. In G. Ger-
mishuisen & N.L. Meyer, Plants of southern Africa: an annotated
checklist. Strelitzia 14: 1054—1071.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2006. Hyacinthaceae. In G. Ger-
mishuizen, N.L. Meyer, Y. Steenkamp & M. Keith, A checklist
of South African plants. Southern African Botanical Diversity
Network Report No. 41: 952-971. SABONET, Pretoria.
MCNEILL, J„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J., SILVA, PC., SKOG, J.E., WIERSEMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomen-
clature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International
Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Vegeta-
ble 146: 1-568. Gantner Verlag, Liechtenstein.
REID, C. 1993. Hyacinthaceae (Part B). In T.H. Arnold & B.C. De Wet,
Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of
the Botanical Survey of South Africa Flo. 62: 146-1 55. National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
*U. EGGLI & * **N.R. CROUCH
* Sukkulenten-Sammlung, Zurich, Mythenquai 88, CH-8002 Zurich,
Switzerland. E-mail: urs.eggli@zuerich.ch.
** Ethnobotany Unit, South African National Biodiversity Insti-
tute, PO. Box 52099, 4007 Berea Road, Durban / School
of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 4041 Durban.
E-mail: n. crouch@sanbi.org. za.
MS. received: 2010-1 1-30.
44
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FABACEAE
ANEW SPECIES OF BAUHINIA FROM SOUTHERN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE REINSTATEMENT OF BAUHINIA MACR.4NTHA
Bauhinia burrowsii E.J.D. Schmidt, sp. nov.
TYPE. — Mozambique: Inhambane Province, near
Mapinhane, 22° 13.385' S and 34° 54.347’ E, 4 April
2010, E.J.D. Schmidt 5022 (PRE, holo.; BNRH, Ernst
Schmidt Herbarium, K, LMA, PRU, iso.).
Shrub up to 5 m high; bark smooth and grey, some-
times covered with small lenticels; branches terete,
reddish brown, sparsely puberulous. hairs reddish and
soon lost, becoming grey with age; remnants of older
branchlets form stout, branched thom-like structures.
Leaves alternate, 2-lobed to ± two-thirds of way, lobe
apices rounded, base truncate to rounded; leaf lamina
wider than long, 20-50 x 30-70 mm; venation palmate
with 9 primary veins, veins darker than lamina in dried
specimens, reticulation not prominent; dark green and
hairless above, slightly paler below with white minutely
appressed-puberulous indumentum, virtually invisible
to the naked eye; margin entire; petiole 8-20 mm long.
Inflorescence a terminal minutely appressed-puberulous
raceme, up to 55 mm long, with up to 18 flowers; pedi-
cels 3-10 mm long. Flowers bisexual and pentamerous,
buds ± 45 mm long, upper part (sepals) ± 25 mm long
and linear-lanceolate in outline; hypanthium ± 20 mm
long, finely puberulous. Petals white, very narrowly
elliptic to obovate, 20-33 x 2-4 mm, margin crisped,
outside covered in small basifixed glands (± 2 mm long),
also present in young vegetative parts. Stamens 5, very
slender, 30—40 mm long, white; anthers 2. 5-3. 5 mm
long, dorsifixed close to middle of anther. Stigma 1 .0-
1 .5 mm in diam., peltate. Style 3-6 mm long. Pod dehis-
cent, narrowly oblanceolate to linear-oblong, 60-220
x 17-28 mm, dark brown. Seeds up to 14 per pod,
brown to olive, obovate to subcircular, 7-12 x 5-10 mm.
Figures 1-5.
Diagnostic characters and affinities : the limited dis-
tribution and small flowers with narrow petals are diag-
nostic for B. burrowsii. The closest affinity would be
Bauhinia petersiana Bolle. In flower, the new species
is easily distinguished by the lack of prominent pink
stamens and the generally smaller flowers. The width
of petals in B. petersiana is at least 6 mm, whereas in
B. burrowsii , the maximum is 4 mm. Furthermore, the
anthers in the latter species are dorsifixed close to the
middle of the anther; whereas in B. petersiana , they are
situated more towards one side and are much larger — a
minimum of ± 6 mm (up to 14 mm) long — as opposed
to a maximum of 3.5 mm long in B. burrowsii (Brenan
1967; Coates Palgrave 2002; Schmidt et al. 2007). In
short, the flowers of B. burrowsii are about half the size
of B. petersiana with a different colour and a morpho-
logically different anther attachment (Figure 5). In her-
barium specimens, the leaves of B. burrowsii are gloss-
ier above than those of B. petersiana.
Distribution and habitat', currently only known from
the type locality to the east of Mapinhane and a col-
lection made by Barbosa & Balsinhas on 28 March
1952 [G. Barbosa & A. Balsinhas 5042 (K, photo.!)].
Although collected the same time of the year, the latter
specimen does not have flowers and is therefore easily
mistaken. There is some doubt as to where exactly this
specimen was collected, since it refers to a Vilanculos-
Mabote-Mambone-Ynrrawenfo’ [crossing]. If this refers
to the turn-off at Mapinhane (which seems to be the only
logical conclusion, although the name is not used), this
would be close to the type locality for B. burrowsii. It
can be regarded as endemic to the area. It occurs in open
woodland. This is part of the southern Zanzibar-Inham-
bane regional mosaic (White 1983). Another endemic,
Croton inhambanensis Radcl.-Sm. was described from
the same area. This species was subsequently collected
as far south as Paindane on the coast and B. burrowsii
may also occur as far south as the C. inhambanensis.
Another endemic plant described from the vicinity is
Croton aceroides Radcl.-Sm.
Status'. Bauhinia burrowsii can be described as
locally common where the type specimen was collected.
The area is sparsely populated and the main economic
activity is non-commercial existence agriculture, i.e.
the planting of maize and cassava on a few scattered
small plots. A commercial cattle farm has recently been
established in the area. Thus far, this agriculture has had
a minimal effect on the survival of the plant. Further
studies are needed to establish if plants of the new spe-
cies are indeed threatened. If it does occur further south
in the Paindane area it would be under threat locally
because of the threat of human expansion.
Etymolog)’: the epithet honours John Burrows, for
his unselfish contribution to the knowledge of the plants
of southern Africa. The proposed common name for the
species is the Manyikeni Bauhinia , after Zimbabwe de
Manyikeni , a historical site close to the type locality. A
visit to the site by the author led to the discovery of the
plant.
Other specimens examined
MOZAMBIQUE. — 2234 Mabote: ‘entre o cruzamento de estradas
Vilanculos-Mambone-Maboti e o Maboti, a 8.7 km de cruzamento'
[between the cross-roads Vilanculos-Mambone-Maboti and the 8.7 km
crossing], 28 Mar. 1952, G. Barbosa & A. Balsinhas 5042 (K, photo.!);
near Mapinhane, (-BA) 22° 13.388’S and 34° 54.395'E, 27 Mar. 2009,
E.J.D. Schmidt 4670 (Ernst Schmidt Herbarium, LMA. PRE); ibid., (—
BA) 22° 1 3.37 1'S and 34° 54.370'E, 4 Apr. 2010, E.J.D.Schmidt 5020
(Ernst Schmidt Herbarium, LMA).
THE REINSTATEMENT OF BAUHINIA MACRANTHA
During the research into the species of Bauhinia ,
it became apparent that the current classification of
Bauhinia petersiana Bolle is unsatisfactory. Brummitt &
Ross (1975) treated the differences between the taxa pre-
viously known as B. macrantha Oliv. and B. petersiana ,
and came to the conclusion that they should be treated
as subspecies, namely B. petersiana Bolle subsp. serpae
(Ficalho & Hiern) Brummitt & J.H.Ross and B. petersi-
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
45
FIGURE 1. — Bauhinia burrowsii, E.J.D. Schmidt 4670 (PRE): A, flowering branchlet; B, fruit. Scale bar: 20 mm. Artist: Carla Grinstad.
46
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 2. — Bauhinia burrowsii , habit in type locality, April 2010.
Photographer: Ernst Schmidt.
FIGURE 3. — Bauhinia burrowsii, flowers at type locality, March 2009.
Photographer: Ernst Schmidt.
FIGURE 4. — Bauhinia burrowsii, flowers and fruit at type locality,
March 2009. Photographer: Ernst Schmidt.
ana Bolle subsp. petersiana. The name serpae referred
to the previously entity known as B. macrantha and was
a result of an unfortunate decision in Seattle in 1 969 at
the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature meet-
ing (Coetzer & Ross 1977). The subspecies name was
later changed to B. petersiana Bolle subsp. macrantha
(Oliv.) Brummitt & J.H.Ross (Brummitt & Ross 1982).
The main reasons for regarding the taxa as subspecies
and not full species are that their distributions are almost
entirely allopatric and that there is, according to the
authors, sufficient overlap of characteristics to justify it.
An allopatric distribution may be an indication that
two entities are geographical different races of the same
species, and therefore subspecies. However, it is also a
well-known source of full species known as allopatric
speciation. It is interesting, however, that in Zimbabwe
and Zambia the two entities do occur together. They are
therefore strictly not allopatric. There are no reports or
collections of intermediates from these areas in which
they occur together. If they were indeed of the same spe-
cies one would have expected intermediates. There are
almost no variations within the entities throughout their
respective ranges. Therefore the evidence on distribution
supports the recognition of these entities as full species.
Furthermore a combination of overlapping features is
not conclusive proof of entities being mere subspecies
and not full species. It may also be used to differentiate
between species. There are many keys that use a com-
bination of overlapping keys to differentiate between
species. Field observation and field botanists support the
full species status of these entities.
FIGURE 5. — Photographic com-
parison between flowers of
Bauhinia petersiana subsp.
petersiana ( left) and B. bur-
rowsii (right). Photographer:
Emst Schmidt.
1
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
47
FIGURE 6. — Known distribution of Bauhinia burrowsii.
The author therefore respectfully reinstates the enti-
ties as full species as it was before 1975 and the correct
names are as follows (there are no subspecies for these
species):
Bauhinia macrantha Oliv. in Flora of Tropical East
Africa 2: 289 (1871 ). Type: Angola, Ninda, Serpa Pinto
9 (LISU, holo.).
Bauhinia petersiana Bolle in Peters, Naturwissen-
schaftliche Reise nach Mossambique: Botanik 1 : 24
(1861). Type: Mozambique, ‘rios de Sena’, Peters s.n.
(B, holo. f, K).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author gratefully acknowledges Carla Grins-
tad for the line drawings, Mrs Beverley Momberg and
the anonymous referees for their help with the text, and
the Instituto de Investigaqao Agraria de Mozambique
(HAM) for permission to collect plants in Mozambique.
REFERENCES
BRENAN, J.P.M. 1967. Flora of tropica / East Africa: Leguminosae
subfamily Caesalpinioideae. Crown Agents, London.
BRUMM1TT, R.K. & ROSS, J.H. 1975. The relationship of Bauhinia
petersiana and B. micrantha (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae).
Kew Bulletin 30: 593-595.
BRUMMITT, R.K. & ROSS, J.H. 1982. Anew combination for an Afri-
can Bauhinia. Kew Bulletin 37: 236.
COATES PALGRAVE, M. 2002. Trees of southern Afi-ica, edn 3.
Struik, Cape Town.
COETZER, L.A. & ROSS, J.H. 1977. Caesalpinioideae. Bauhinia.
Flora of southern Africa 1 6,2: 47 — 55.
SCHMIDT, E„ LOTTER,' M. & McCLELAND, W. 2007. Trees and
shrubs of Mpumalanga and Kruger National Park, edn 2. Jaca-
na, Johannesburg.
WHITE, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa: a descriptive memoir to
accompany the Unesco/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Afii-
ca. Unesco, Paris.
E.J.D. SCHMIDT*
* Ernst Schmidt Herbarium, P.O. Box 28, 1241 Kiepersol, South Africa.
MS. received: 2011-02-09.
HYAC1NTHACEAE
NEW COMBINATIONS IN LEDEBOURIA
The close relationship among Drimiopsis Lindl. &
Paxton, Ledebouria Roth and Resnova Van der Merwe
(Hyacinthoideae: Massonieae) that was highlighted by
Jessop (1972) has subsequently resulted in their segrega-
tion as the subtribe Ledebouriinae within tribe Masson-
ieae (Miiller-Doblies & Miiller-Doblies 1997). Charac-
ters that define the group include the mostly spotted or
streaked leaves, commonly multiple inflorescences per
annual growth cycle, reduced or obsolete bracts, and
paired ovules per locule; often with just a single seed
developing in only one or two of the locules. The leath-
ery capsule walls and the complete dehiscence, with
the locules reflexing completely, are diagnostic for the
group.
The generic status of the three taxa is less clear,
however, and Resnova has usually been treated as syn-
onymous with either Drimiopsis (Jessop 1972) or
Ledebouria [as Scilla] (Phillips 1951). More recently,
Miiller-Doblies & Miiller-Doblies (1997) proposed their
reinstatement at generic level, a treatment that was fol-
lowed by Lebatha et al. (2006). The development of
molecular techniques has prompted a renewed inter-
est in the systematic status of the three genera, but pre-
liminary phylogenetic analyses of plastid sequence data
have either failed to provide compelling evidence sup-
porting the recognition of three genera (Manning et al.
2004), or have actually demonstrated that Ledebouria
is paraphyletic unless it includes Drimiopsis and Res-
nova., although the latter two are evidently monophyletic
(Pfosser & Speta 1999; Pfosser et al. 2003; Wetschnig
& Pfosser 2003; Lebatha et al. 2006; Wetschnig et al.
2007). A morphological cladistic analysis of the group
provided only weak support (jacknife support value 55)
for a monophyletic Ledebouria, based on a limited sam-
pling of just eight species in the genus (Lebatha et al.
48
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
2006). Proposed synapomorphies for Ledebonria s.str.
were a conical and severally lobed ovary, a style that
is longer than the ovary, and punctate-reticulate pol-
len (Lebatha et al. 2006). Of these states, ovary shape
and lobing are not consistent across the genus, with both
ovoid and turbinate and 3- or 6-lobed ovaries present in
the genus (Venter 2008). Ledebouria s.str. thus remains
very weakly diagnosable.
The lack of convincing molecular evidence support-
ing the recognition of the three genera as monophyletic
lineages led Manning et al. (2004) to include both Drim-
iopsis and Resnova in a broadly circumscribed Ledebou-
ria. They suggested that the various floral differences
between the three taxa that are generally used to jus-
tify their separation at generic level probably represent
linked pollination syndromes, and are thus not indepen-
dent. In any event, there is no doubt that the three taxa
are closely allied, and their taxonomic status at this stage
is primarily a matter of choice, although molecular data
favours their treatment as a single genus.
The broader circumscription of Ledebouria pro-
posed by Manning et al. (2004) has been implemented
in the latest checklist of southern African plants (Man-
ning & Goldblatt 2006), but a new species of Drimiopsis
described since then (Hankey et al. 2008) lacks a nomen-
clature! combination in Ledebouria. We provide this com-
bination here to facilitate its integration into checklists
and floras that adopt the broader generic circumscrip-
tion. A combination is also provided for Resnova trans-
vaalensis Van der Merwe, which was treated by Manning
et al. (2004) as conspecific with Resnova humifusa Van
der Merwe, following Muller-Doblies & Miiller-Doblies
(1997), but which we now consider to be distinct.
We also take this opportunity to formalize the sta-
tus of Drimiopsis and Resnova at sectional level within
Ledebouria. Current morphological and molecular ana-
lyses suggest that these two groups are monophyletic
and it is useful to have a formal way of referring to
them as infrageneric clusters within Ledebouria (Le-
batha et al. 2006). It is likely that additional sections
will be required in order to render sect. Ledebouria
monophyletic, but this will require a more complete
analysis of the group.
Ledebouria Roth, Novae plantarum species prae-
sertim Indiae orientalis: 194 (1821). Type: Ledebouria
hyacinthina Roth
Section Drimiopsis (Lindl. & Paxton) J.C. Manning
& Goldblatt, stat. nov.
Drimiopsis Lindl. & Paxton: 73 (1851). Type:
Drimiopsis maculata Lindl. = Ledebouria petiolata
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt
Ledebouria linioseta (A.J. Hankey & P.D. Lebatha)
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb. nov. Drimiopsis lini-
oseta A.J. Hankey & P.D. Lebatha, in Hankey et al.: 72
(2008). Type: South Africa, Mpumalanga, between
Roossenekal and Lydenburg, 25 Nov. 1999, Hankey &
Turner 900 (PRE, holo.; K, iso.).
Section Resnova (Van der Merwe) J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt, stat. nov.
Resnova Van der Merwe: 46 (1946). Type: Resnova
humifusa (Baker) U.Miill.-Doblies & D.Mtill.-Doblies,
designated by Muller-Doblies & Muller-Doblies (1997:
59).
Ledebouria transvaalensis (Van der Merwe)
J.C. Manning & Goldblatt, comb. nov. Resnova trans-
vaalensis Van der Merwe: 46 (1946). Type: South
Africa, [Mpumalanga], Piet Retief Distr., Amsterdam,
Van der Merwe s.n. PRE26432 (PRE, holo.).
REFERENCES
HANKEY, A.J., BUYS, M.H. & LEBATHA, P.D. 2008. Drimiopsis
linioseta (Hyacinthaceae), a new species from the Sekhukhune-
land centre of endemism. South Africa. Bothalia 38: 12-1 A.
JESSOP, J.P. 1972. Studies in the bulbous Liliaceae in South Africa: 2.
Drimiopsis and Resnova. Journal of South African Botany 38:
151-162.
LEBATHA, P.D., BUYS, M.H. & STEDJE, B. 2006. Ledebouria , Res-
nova and Drimiopsis'. a tale of three genera. Taxon 55: 643-652.
LINDLEY, J & PAXTON, J. 1 85 1 . Paxton 's Flower Garden vol. 2. Lon-
don.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2006. Hyacinthaceae. In G.
Germishuizen, N.L. Meyer, Y. Steenkamp & M. Keith (eds), A
checklist of South African Plants : 952-971. Southern African
Biodiversity Network Report No. 41. SABONET, Pretoria.
MANNING, J.C., GOLDBLATT, P. & FAY, M.F. 2004. A revised
generic synopsis of Hyacinthaceae in sub-Saharan Africa, based
on molecular evidence, including new combinations and the
new tribe Pseudoprospereae. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 60:
533-568.
MULLER-DOBLIES, U. & MULLER-DOBLIES, D. 1997. A partial
revision of the tribe Massonieae (Hyacinthaceae). Feddes Rep-
ertorium 32: 49-96.
PHILLIPS, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African flowering plants Ed.
2. Botanical Survey Memoir No. 25. Department of Agriculture,
Division of Botany and Plant Pathology, Pretoria.
PFOSSER, M. & SPETA, F. 1999. Phylogenetics of Hyacinthaceae
based on plastid DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botani-
cal Garden 86,4: 852-857.
PFOSSER, M„ WETSCHNIG, W„ UNGAR, S. & PRENNER, G.
2003. Phylogenetic relationships among genera of Massonieae
(Hyacinthaceae) inferred from plastid DNA and seed morphol-
ogy. Journal of Plant Research 116: 115-132.
ROTH, A.W. 1821. Novae plantarum species praesertim Indiae orien-
talis. Halberstad.
VAN DER MERWE, F.Z. 1946. Aantekeninge vir die hersiening van die
genus Scilla L. in Suid-Afrika. ‘n Nuwe genus: Resnova. Tvd-
skrif vir Wetenskap en Kuns 6: 41 — 46.
VENTER. S. 2008. Synopsis of the genus Ledebouria Roth (Hya-
cinthaceae) in South Africa. Herbertia 62: 85-1 55.
WETSCHNIG, W. & PFOSSER, M. 2003. The Scilla plumbea puz-
zle— present status of the genus Scilla sensu lato in southern
Africa and description of Spetaea lachenaliiflora, a new genus
and species of Massonieae (Hyacinthaceae). Taxon 52: 75-92.
WETSCHNIG, W„ KNIRSCH, W„ ALL S.S. & PFOSSER, M. 2007.
Systematic position of three little known and frequently mis-
placed species of Hyacinthaceae from Madagascar. Phyton Al :
321-337.
J.C. MANNING*' ** and P. GOLDBLATT***
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of
Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal,
Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2010-11-08.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
49
AIZOACEAE
CORPUSCULAR] A GRACILLIMA IS THE CORRECT BINOMIAL FOR THE ILLEGITIMATE C. GRACILIS
L. Bolus validly published Delosperma gracile
L. Bolus in 1958 and later, in 1961, but based on a dif-
ferent type. She rectified this error (Bolus 1964) by pro-
viding the new name D. gracillimum L. Bolus for the
illegitimate later homonym. Hartmann (2001), when
transferring D. gracillimum from Delosperma to the
genus Corpuscularia erred in using the epithet gracilis
(Hartmann 2001). According to the International Code
of Botanical Nomenclature, for any taxon below the
rank of genus, the correct name is the combination of the
correct genus name and the final epithet of the earliest
legitimate name of the taxon in the same rank (McNeill
et al. (2006): Article 1 1 .4), which in this case is D. gra-
cillimum. Therefore, the correct name within the genus
Corpuscularia is C. gracillima. If no available epithet
existed, Hartmann could have re-used the epithet gra-
cilis as new, without reference to L. Bolus (Art. 58.1),
but this was not the case. Furthermore, because she
cited Delosperma gracillimum L. Bolus as a synonym,
the binomial Corpuscularia gracilis H.E.K. Hartmann
is superfluous and illegitimate (McNeill et al. (2006):
Art. 52.1). Herbarium acronyms follow Holmgren et al.
(1990).
Corpuscularia gracillima (L. Bolus) Niederle comb,
nov. Delosperma gracillimum L. Bolus in Journal of
South African Botany 30: 243 (1964), as nom. nov. pro
D. gracile L. Bolus (1961 ) non L. Bolus (1958). D. grac-
ile L. Bolus: 180 (1961), horn, illegit. Corpuscularia
gracilis (L. Bolus) H.E.K. Hartmann: 177 (2002 ‘2001’),
nom. illegit. superfl. Type: South Africa, Cape [Eastern
Cape], Seven Fountains near Grahamstown, 1959, Hall,
H. NBG 102/59 (BOL 131214— central branch, lecto.!,
here designated).
L. Bolus treated the whole gathering Hall, H. NBG
102/59 as the type. According to McNeill et al. (2006),
Art. 8.2, Ex. 1., the whole sheet BOL131214 cannot
serve as type because it contains four branches, which
1 interpret as belonging to the original collection, and
further flowers dated 28 March 1961. The problem con-
cerns nearly all sheets prepared by L. Bolus who later
added flowers to specimens. The names published by
her on or after 1 January 1958 would be problematic if
the collections indicated as types were of living plants
or seeds in reality. My lectotypification overcomes the
problem, whether the branches belong to the original
gathering or to plants cultivated by L. Bolus.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Helpful comments by two anonymous referees and
literature references provided by Chris Schroder are
gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1958. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and some allied
genera 3, pp 289 — 4 1 7. University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1961. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 27 : 1 69—1 80.
BOLUS, H.M.L. 1964. Notes on Mesembryanthemum and allied gen-
era. Journal of South African Botany 30: 231-243.
HARTMANN, H.E.K. 2001 . Illustrated handbook of succulent plants:
Aizoaceae A-E. Springer, Berlin.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum, part 1: The herbaria of the world , edn 8.
New York Botanical Garden. New York.
MCNEILL, J„ BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH, D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J„ SILVA, PC., SKOG, J.E., WIERSEMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. (eds.) 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature ( Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth Inter-
national Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria. July 2005. A.R.G.
Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, Liechtenstein. [Regnum Veg. 146].
J. NIEDERLE
PfF MU, Brno, Kotlarska 2, E-mail: niederle@inail.muni.cz.
MS. received: 2011-06-16.
IRIDACEAE
TAXONOMIC NOTES ON MORAEA (IRIDEAE) IN CONGO AND ADJACENT COUNTRIES
The genus Moraea Miller, now with some 210 spe-
cies (including several in press or manuscript), is centred
in southern Africa (Goldblatt 1986; Goldblatt & Manning
2010), but extends through tropical Africa to Ethiopia and
Eritrea in the north and to Nigeria and Cameroon in the
west. Outside the continent, two species of sect. Gynan-
driris (Parlatore) Goldblatt (Goldblatt 1998) occur in the
Mediterranean basin and Middle East. Goldblatt (1977)
recognised 24 species in tropical Africa, but later sepa-
rated M. stricta Baker from M. thomsonii Baker (Goldblatt
1986). Of these 25 tropical African species, six are shared
with eastern southern Africa, leaving 1 9 species restricted
to tropical Africa. Geerinck (2001), focusing on the genus
in Shaba Province of Congo (Kinshasa), has recently
described one new species, M. schaijesiorum Geerinck,
and reduced two species recognised by Goldblatt (1977)
to synonymy in M. ventricosa Baker: M. macrantha Baker
to varietal rank as var. macrantha (Baker) Geerinck and
M. verdickii De Wild, to the rank of forma in var. macran-
tha. In addition, Geerinck described f. boussardiana Geer-
inck of var. ventricosa and f. witteana Geerinck of var.
macrantha. These infraspecific taxa were distinguished by
minor details of perianth size and colour, with var. ventri-
cosa and var. macrantha based on flower size, specifically
50
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
outer tepals and anthers, and f. boussardiana and f. wit-
teana by flower colour alone.
Morciea ventricosa is particularly distinctive among
the several large-flowered species of subgen. Gran-
diflora Goldblatt in its yellow, white, or blue flowers
with outer tepals 40-55 mm long, inner tepals 37-45
mm long, and anthers 8-11 mm long. Both the larger
outer and smaller inner tepal limbs are characteristically
spathulate, obtuse and ultimately fully reflexed, with the
broad style branches and crests arching to lie nearly hor-
izontally, and the ovary is always included in the spathes
(Goldblatt 1977, 1993, 1996). The species favours wet
habitats such as stream banks, seeps, and dambos; and
occurs across central Africa from Angola to Tanza-
nia. Moraea macrantha , with much the same range, is
a plant of well-drained, open woodlands or grasslands,
and has larger, consistently blue flowers with outer
tepals 57-80 mm long, inner tepals 55-75 mm long, and
anthers 12-15 mm long. Both species flower late in the
season, mainly March to May or June.
Moraea verdickii is less well known to us but it
blooms early in the season, mostly November to Feb-
ruary, usually has an exserted ovary, and has relatively
large yellow, or rarely white flowers, with outer tepals
mostly 60-80 mm long (rarely to 100 mm) and the
inner tepals 45-70 mm long, acute and evidently erect
(as far as we are able to determine) (Goldblatt 1977;
see also Geerinck 2005: photo 4). In comparison, plants
of M. ventricosa that we have examined always have
smaller flowers with an included ovary and the diagnos-
tic, markedly obtuse inner and outer tepals with fully
reflexed limbs. These features are also evident in a pho-
tograph accompanying the type of f. boussardiana.
In view of the correlated morphological and ecological
characteristics, we feel justified in maintaining Moraea
verdickii and M. macrantha as separate species distinct
from M. ventricosa. Within M. ventricosa as thus circum-
scribed, however, we consider the rank of forma to be triv-
ial and not worthy of recognition, and we therefore reduce
the fonns to synonymy. The forms in this case appear to
be local colour variants and a full review of the tropical
African species over their entire ranges should be under-
taken before any infraspecific taxa are identified. Those
wishing to recognise Geerinck’s forms remain free to do
so as the names exist and constitute an alternative treat-
ment of the group, at least in Congo.
Finally, we have examined the type of Moraea scha-
ijesiorum and conclude that it differs in no significant
way from M. clavata R.C. Foster, until now recorded in
the literature only from Angola and Zambia, to the south
and west of Congo. However, a collection of M. clavata
from Shaba [Schaijes & Michiel 2083 , 6 Sept. 1983,
17 km WSW of Kolwezi (K)], not cited by Geerinck,
is the first record of the species in the Congo. The type
of M. schaijesiorum was collected in 1988, and both it
and the earlier Shaba collection match typical M. cla-
vata in their relatively small, yellow flowers with outer
tepals 20-35 mm long, short foliage leaf inserted in the
middle of the stem, single sheathing leaf, and spathes
45-70 mm long. The early flowering time (November
in the type), is also consistent with M. clavata , the main
blooming time of which is from October to Decem-
ber (Goldblatt 1977). The occurrence of the species in
Shaba, not far from the Zambian frontier is not surpris-
ing. We have no hesitation in reducing M. schaijesiorum
to synonymy in M. clavata.
Moraea clavata R.C. Foster in Contributions from
the Gray Herbarium 114: 49 (1936), as nom. nov. pro
Moraea gracilis Baker: 272 (1878), horn, illegit. non
A.Dietr. (1833). Type: Angola, Huila, near Lopollo
River, Welwitsch 1545 (BM, lecto.!, designated by Gold-
blatt: 287 (1977); K!, LISUI, isolecto.).
M. schaijesiorum Geerinck: 1 1 (2003), syn. nov.
Type: Congo, [Shaba], plateau de Manika, road from
Kolwezi to Musokatanda, 8 Nov. 1988, Schaijes 4144
(BR, holo.!).
Moraea macrantha Baker , Flora of tropical Africa 7:
340 (1898). M. ventricosa var. macrantha (Baker) Geer-
inck: 4 (2001 ). Type: Malawi, Northern Province, Whyte
s.n. (K, holo.!).
Moraea arnoldiana De Wild.: 16 (1902). Type.
Congo, [Shaba], Kasenga, Verdick 606 (BR, holo.!).
Moraea ventricosa Baker in Bulletin of Miscellane-
ous Information, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 1895:
73 (1895). Type: Zambia, Northern Province, Fwambo,
Carson 37/1984 (K, holo.!).
M. bequaertii De Wild.: 540 (1913). M. ventricosa f.
bequaertii (De Wild.) Geerinck: 4 (2001). Type: Congo,
[Shaba], Lubumbashi, 5 Apr. 1912, Bequaert 316 [BR,
lecto.!, designated by Goldblatt: 280 (1977)].
M. ventricosa f. boussardiana Geerinck: 4 (2001),
syn. nov. Type: Burundi, Kigamba, 3 Apr. 1977, Reek-
mans 5982 (BR, holo.!).
Moraea verdickii De Wild, in Annales du Musee du
Congo Beige, Bot. 4: 17 (1902). M. ventricosa var. ma-
crantha f. verdickii (De Wild.) Geerinck: 5 (2001 ). Type:
Congo, [Shaba], Lukafu, Verdick 281 (BR, holo.!).
M. ventricosa var. macrantha f. witteana Geerinck: 5
(2001), syn. nov. Type: Congo, Parc National Upemba,
Riv. Kenia, 28 Mar. 1947, De Witte 2470 (BR, holo.!).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Odile Weber, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew,
for assistance with exsiccatae details and the Director,
Brussels Herbarium, for loan of type material.
REFERENCES
BAKER, J.G. 1878. Report on the Liliaceae, Iridaceae, Hypoxida-
ceae, and Haemodoraceae of Welwitsch’s Angolan Herbarium.
Transactions of the Linnean Society. London. Botany, ser. 2, 1 :
245-273.
BAKER, J.G. 1895. CCCCLI-Diagnoses Africanae, IV. Bulletin of
Miscellaneous Information. Roval Botanic Gardens. Kew. 1895:
63-75.
BAKER, J.G. 1898. Irideae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora of tropica!
Africa 1: 337-376. Reeve, London.
DE WILDEMAN, E. 1902. Etudes sur la flore du Katanga. Enumeration
systematique. Annales du Musee du Congo Beige, Botanique 4:
1-241.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
51
DE WILDEMAN, E. 1913. Decades novarum specierum florae katan-
gensis. VII I— X I . Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegeta-
bilis 1 1 : 535-547.
DIETRICH, A.G. 1833. Species plantarum. Nauck, Berlin.
FOSTER, R.C. 1936. Notes on nomenclature in Iridaceae. Contributions
from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 1 14: 37-50.
GEERINCK, D. 2001. Les variations infraspecifiques de Moraea ven-
tricosa Baker (Iridaceae d’Afrique centrale). Taxonomania 4: 4,
5.
GEERINCK, D. 2003. Une nouvelle espece pour la famille des Iri-
daceae au Congo-Kinshasa: Moraea schaijesiorum Geerinck.
Taxonomania 10: 11.
GEERINCK, D. 2005. Iridaceae. In D. Geerinck, C. Schaijes & M.
Schaijes, Flore d'Afrique Centrale. Jardin Botanique National
de Belgique. Me'ise.
GOLDBLATT, R 1977. Systematics of Moraea (Iridaceae) in tropical
Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 64: 243-295.
GOLDBLATT, R 1986. The moraeas of southern Africa. Annals of Kirs-
tenbosch Botanic Gardens 14: 1—224.
GOLDBLATT, R 1993. Iridaceae. In G.V.Pope, Flora zambesiaca. Flora
Zambesiaca Managing Committee, London.
GOLDBLATT, R 1996. Iridaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropical East
Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam.
GOLDBLATT, P. 1998. Reduction of Barnardiella, Galaxia, Gynan-
driris, Hexaglottis, Homeria and Roggeveldia in Moraea. Novon
8: 371-377.
GOLDBLATT, P. & MANNING, J.C. 2010. Moraea intermedia and M.
vuvuzela (Iridaceae: Iridoideae), two new species from western
South Africa, and some nomenclatural changes and range exten-
sions in the genus. Bothalia 40: 146-153.
P. GOLDBLATT* & J.C. MANNING** ***
*B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Garden,
P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA. E-mail: peter.goid-
blatt@mobot.org
** Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
*** Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of
Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal,
Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa;
E-mail: j.manning@sanbi.org.za
MS. received: 2011-03-16.
MONIMIACEAE
TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURAL NOTES ON THE MONOTYP1C GENUS XYMALOS AND GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE
FAMILY MONIMIACEAE
INTRODUCTION
Harvey (1863) originally described Xylosma mono-
spora Harv., based on specimens from KwaZulu-Natal
but without precise localities ( Cooper 1251 and Cooper
1204), as belonging to the Flacourtiaceae. In 1878,
Bentham described Toxicodendrum acutifolium Benth.
from the Eastern Cape for the same taxonomic entity
but placed it in the Euphorbiaceae. Later Engler (1895,
1900) described the species yet again, this time from
Tanzania, under the name Paxiodendron usambarense
Engl, but placing it in the Lauraceae.
Baillon (1887) compared Harvey’s X. monospora
(which has a monocarpellate ovary with a solitary ovule,
sessile stigma, and drupaceous, non-dehiscent fruit)
with Hyaenanche Lamb., then in the Euphorbiaceae
but now in Picrodendraceae (APG III 2009). Species
of Hyaenanche have 4-locular ovaries with two ovules
per locule, 3-5 styles connate in the lower half, and
dehiscent capsules. Baillon (1887) concluded that the
two entities placed respectively by Bentham (1878) in
Xylosma G.Forst. and by Harvey (1863) in Toxicoden-
drum were in fact conspecific but did not belong in
either Toxicodendrum or Xylosma. He therefore placed it
in a new genus Xymalos Baill., which is an anagram of
Xylosma, which means fragrant wood — referring to the
leaves and wood that are lemon-scented when crushed.
He placed Xymalos in the Bixaceae.
De Jussieu founded the family Monimiaceae in 1809
based on three genera, Monimia Thou., Atherosperma
Labill. (a monotypic genus from Australia and Tasma-
nia), and Siparuna Aubl. (a large neo-tropical genus
with over 70 species). Oliver (1896) was the first to
place Xymalos in the Monimiaceae and also emended
the generic description. This familial transfer was fol-
lowed by amongst others Baker & Wright (1909), Per-
kins & Gilg ( 191 1 ), Wright (1912), Engler (1915), Verd-
court (1968), and Stannard (1997). Warburg (1893)
recognized Xymalos as closely related to the Flacour-
tiaceae, but Gibbs (1917) and Hutchinson (1973) both
placed Xymalos in the Trimeniaceae. Currently Xymalos
is placed in Monimiaceae subfamily Mollinedioideae
(Thome 1974; Philipson 1987, 1993). Molecular data
support this classification (Renner 1998, 1999). Moni-
miaceae is a pantropical family in the order Laurales and
in a broad sense comprises 440 species and 34 genera
(Philipson 1987, 1993). The small families Atherosper-
mataceae and Siparunaceae have since been excluded
from the Monimiaceae. Trimeniaceae is excluded from
the order Laurales — a decision that is well supported
by phylogenetic and morphological studies (Mooney
el al. 1950; Renner 1999; Renner & Chanderbali 2000;
Romanov et al. 2007; APG III 2009). Mabberley (2008)
recorded 24 genera in the family but the new mono-
typic genus, Grazielanthus, from the Brazilian Atlantic
Coastal Forest has since been described by Peixoto &
Pereira-Moura (2008). The family currently comprises
150-220 species of shrubs and small trees in 25 genera
(Renner et al. 2010). It has a highly disjunct, presum-
ably Gondwanan distribution, mainly in the southern
hemisphere (Renner et al. 2010). Xymalos monospora
occurs in montane forests in east tropical and southern
Africa, West Cameroon, and on Bioko, an island once
connected to Africa (Figure 1 ).
Monimiaceae, together with the closely related fami-
lies Lauraceae and Hemandiaceae ( Gyrocarpus Jacq.),
are characterized by having secretory cells containing
so-called ‘ethereal oil’ (ethereal oil cells) and a unila-
cunar nodal anatomy (Mooney et al. 1950). Monim-
iaceae can be recognized by decussate to subopposite,
exstipulate leaves; twigs that are often flattened below
the somewhat swollen nodes; leaves that are pellucid-
52
Bothalia 42, 1 (2012)
FIGURE 1. — Distribution of Xymalos monospora based on specimens
housed in the National Herbarium, Pretoria, and on the literature
(Verdcourt 1968; Stannard 1997).
dotted due to the presence of numerous glands or ‘ethe-
real oil cells’ (Lorence 1985), and are lemon-scented
when crushed. The lack of stipules is considered by
Hickey & Wolfe (1975) to be derived within the Lau-
rales. Xymalos has leaves with margins that possess a
‘monimioid tooth’ with an undivided median vein and
an indurated cap (Figure 4), another derived character
in the Laurales (Lorence 1985), or the leaves are some-
times entire. Leaves are pinnately veined with prominent
venation on the lower surface and the secondary veins
originate at uniform angles to the costa (Lorence 1985),
looping and joining well within the margin, sometimes
leaving a bullate or puckered surface above. Plants are
usually dioecious or monoecious and the yellow flowers
are very small and mostly unisexual, except for Horto-
nia Wight ex Am., which have bisexual flowers (Endress
& Igersheim 1997). The latter is a Sri Lankan genus,
sister to Xymalos (Renner et al. 2010), and possesses
flowers with an elaborate perianth comprising spirally
arranged petaloid and sepaloid series, 6-14 free, stalked
carpels borne on a discoid receptacle, appendaged sta-
mens and with staminodes present (Lorence 1985). The
receptacle in Monimiaceae is deeply concave, cupuli-
fortn or urceolate (Mooney et al. 1950). The family is
characterized by apocarpous gynoecia with uniovulate
carpels (Endress & Igersheim 1997), surrounded by a
flat or concave floral cup (Lorence 1985). The fruit(lets)
are presented on the opened floral cup. Male flowers
have a 4-8-lobed perianth with few to many stamens,
with or without appendages and arranged in whorls or
sometimes spirally or irregularly disposed, either with-
out a pistillode or with remnants of one. The anthers
are 2—- 1-sporangiate. Staminodes are absent or present
in female flowers, carpels are few to many (only one in
Xymalos) and sessile or stipitate, with a solitary, anatro-
pous ovule. In the genera Kibara Endl. (Malaysia) and
Xymalos (Africa) the discoid stigma is sessile on the
turbinate ovary, but a style is present in all other genera,
typically short and included, but exserted in Monimia
(Philipson 1986, 1993). Ovules in Xymalos are crassinu-
cellate and bitegmic (Leinfellner 1966) and the carpels
are strongly ascidiate in the Mollinedioideae (Endress
& Igersheim 1997). The fruit are either separate drupe-
lets with a ± strongly developed putamen formed by the
lignified endocarp, or apocarpous berrylets frequently
enclosed in a persistent, well-developed fleshy hypan-
thium and/or receptacle (Philipson 1986; Romanov et
al. 2007). Romanov et al. (2007) described these two
fruit forms in the family and distinguished four different
types of drupe(lets) differing in their endocarp structure.
(Copper et al. (2006) record Xymalos mossambi-
censis Cavaco as occurring in tropical Africa. Cavaco
( 1949) described this species from Mozambique but the
name was not taken up by Verdcourt in his account of
the Flora of tropical East Afiica (1968), nor by Stan-
nard in his account for Flora zambesiaca (1997), both
of which only mention Xymalos monospora. Both of
these authors and subsequent publications by Philipson
(1993), Jordaan (2000, 2003), Da Silva et al. (2004) and
Mabberley (2008) consider Xymalos a monotypic genus
occurring in tropical and southern Africa. In Mozam-
bique, Xymalos is recorded north of the Zambezi River
at Ribaue, Gurue (Stannard 1997) and Nampula (Da
Silva et al. 2004) and south of the Zambezi at Tsetssera
(Stannard 1997). Cavaco collected a specimen south of
the Save River (southern Mozambique) and somewhere
between Mapai and Pafuri (Kruger National Park area)
(type specimen mentioned in the protologue). In this
area between Save River and Mapai there is certainly no
suitable habitat for Xymalos monospora , which usually
grows in Afromontane forest, and the closest locality,
Tsetssera, is roughly 400 km to the north of the Mapai-
Pafuri record. Therefore, the locality is very doubtful
as given in the protologue, namely: ‘Sul do Save, entre
Mapai et Pafuri, in Mozambique’.
Cavaco compared the holotype of X. mossambi-
censis with specimens of X. monospora from southern
and tropical Africa housed in the Paris Herbarium (e.g.
Rudatis 1418, Stolz 2063, Holst 4249) and concluded
that his specimen constituted a new species. We have
not seen the type but Cavaco’s (1949) protologue and
accompanying illustration indicate that X. mossambi-
censis differs essentially from X. monospora in having
larger leaves with entire margins and fasciculate rather
than racemose inflorescences. Throughout the distribu-
tion range of X. monospora , the leaf margins vary from
entire (Figure 2) to coarsely serrate with widely spaced
gland-tipped teeth (Figure 3). Inflorescences are always
axillary and vary from cymose to racemose. There are
no significant differences between X. mossambicensis
and X. monospora, and they are therefore considered as
conspecific.
TAXONOMY
Xymalos monospora (Harv.) Bail I. in Bulletin Men-
suel de la Societe Linneenne de Paris 1: 650 (1887);
Warb.: 53 (1893); Oliv.: t. 2444 (1896); Sim: 288, t.
121 (1907); Baker & C.H. Wright: 170 (1909); Per-
kins & Gilg: 10, t. 5 (1911); C.H. Wright: 493 (1912);
F.W. Andrews: 7 (1950); J.Leonard: 402, t. 39 (1951);
Keay: 55 (1954); Verde.: I, t. 1 (1968); Fouilloy: 109
(1974); R.B.Drumm.: 237 (1975); Pooley: 96 (1993);
A.E.van Wyk & P.van Wyk: 302 (1997); Stannard: 43
(1997); Lotter: 114 (2002); M. Coates Palgrave: (2002);
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
53
FIGURE 2. — Xymalos monospora showing entire leaves. Photogra-
pher: M. Lotter.
FIGURE 3. — Xymalos monospora showing toothed leaves and some
leaf damage. Photographer: M. Lotter.
Boon: 104 (2010). Xylosma monospora Harv.: 52, t. 181
(1863). Type: South Africa, Natal [KwaZulu-Natal],
without precise locality, Cooper 1251 (TCD — dig-
ital image!, lecto., designated here; K — digital image!,
PRE!, isolecto.). [Note: Of the two collections cited in
Harvey’s protologue of Xylosma monospora , Cooper
1251 is chosen as the lectotype because there are more
duplicates of this collection than of Cooper 1204.]
Toxicodendrum acutifolium Benth.: 214 (1878). Type:
South Africa, Eastern Cape, ‘British Caffraria’, Barber
& Barber 10 (K — digital image!, holo.).
Paxiodendron usambarense Engl.: 182 (1895). Xyma-
los usambarensis (Engl.) Engl.: 310 (1901). Type: Tan-
ganyika [Tanzania], E Usambara Mountains, Gonja,
Bulwa, Holst 4249 (B, holo.t; P — digital image!, lecto.,
designated here; COI — digital image!, JE — digital
image!, K — digital image!, isolecto.).
P. usambarense var. serratifolia Engl.: 182 (1895).
Type: Tanganyika [Tanzania], Kilimanjaro, Marangu,
Volkens 2264 (B, holo.t; JE — digital image!, lecto., des-
ignated here).
P ulugurense Engl.: 389 (1900). Xymalos ulugurense
(Engl.) Engl.: 310 (1901); Baker & C.H. Wright: 170
(1909). Type: Tanganyika [Tanzania], Uluguru Moun-
tains, Lukwangule Plateau, Goetze 274 (B, holo.t; K —
digital image!, lecto., designated here).
Xymalos mossambicensis Cavaco: 45 (1949). Type:
‘Moqambique [Mozambique], Sul do Save, entre Mapai
et Pafuri’, Cavaco 89 (P, holo.).
Note : Most type specimens were seen as digital
images on websites. Where the holotypes have been
destroyed during World War II in the Berlin Herbarium,
as in the case of Holst and Goetze specimens, lectotypi-
fication is covered by article 9.15 of the Code (McNeill
et al. 2006), which provides for narrowing the lectotype
to a single specimen. There are records of duplicates of
Holst 4249 verified by Engler, isotypes of Paxiodendron
usambarense , in K, COI, JE and P, all of them flower-
ing material, and all specimens show entire leaves. The
Paris specimen is selected because it is the only one
which gives the exact type locality in Tanzania. All the
syntypes of Paxiodendron usambarense Engl. var. ser-
ratifolia Engl, (three Volkens specimens) were destroyed
in Berlin, but one extant isosyntype, Volkens 2264. is
seen on ALUKA [http://plants.jstor.org/], housed at JE,
and is therefore selected as the lectotype. This speci-
men has leaves with widely-spaced teeth in contrast
with all the isotypes of the typical P. usambarense with
entire leaves. There is only a fragment of the duplicate
of Goetze 274 at K, which is selected as the lectotype for
Xymalos ulugurense.
Evergreen tree up to 8(-20) m, mostly single-
stemmed, with dense, rounded, spreading crown. Bark
silvery grey or grey-brown, rough, slightly fissured,
with prominent lenticels, flaking in large scales to leave
concentric, ridged markings; inner wood lemon-yellow;
sap reddish. Leaves simple, opposite, glabrous, lemon-
scented when crushed, pellucid-dotted; lamina narrowly
elliptic to obovate, 40-200 * 15-100 mm, apex acute,
rounded or shortly acuminate, base cuneate, margin usu-
ally irregularly and coarsely glandular-serrate, some-
times entire; midrib sunken above, prominent beneath,
lateral veins 6-9, looping well within margin, reticu-
late venation prominent on both surfaces; petiole up to
30 mm long, glabrous. Inflorescences racemose or pa-
niculate, solitary or paired in leaf axils, 1 0— 35(— 70) mm
long; peduncles 5-10 mm long; bracts triangular,
1.0-2. 5 mm long. Flowers unisexual, small, yellowish
or greenish; pedicels 1-3 mm long, velvety. Perianth
1-2 mm long, hairy. Petals absent. Male flowers: peri-
anth 4-6-lobed; lobes rounded to ovate; stamens 6-15 or
more; anthers subsessile. Female flowers: perianth 3-5-
lobed; lobes ovate, rounded to triangular, velvety, mar-
gins ciliate; ovary obovoid, cylindrical or turbinate, gla-
brous; stigmas sessile, discoid, thick, glabrous. Fruit an
ovoid to ellipsoid drupe, (5-) 10-25 x 3-15 mm, slightly
asymmetrical, glabrous, orange or reddish, fleshy,
crowned with persistent stigma. Seed solitary, ellipsoid,
compressed, 10 « 8 mm, white (Figure 4). Flowering
time: June-Oct.
Diagnostic characters: leaves of Xymalos monospora
are opposite and translucent gland-dotted, with a lemon
smell when crushed. The bark is very distinctive, flak-
ing to reveal circular or worm-like markings, and when
cut has a lemon-like smell (Lotter 2002). Small, fragrant
yellow flowers, the sexes on separate trees, appear from
June to October (Lotter 2002), arranged in racemes and
54
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 4. — Xymalos monospora, A, C & E, Mohle 389 (PRE); B, Van der Schijff 5630 (PRE); D, Compton s.n. (PRE53940)\ F, De Winter <£
Killick 8954 (PRE). A, flowering tw ig x 1;B, leaf with entire margin x 1 ; C, tip of tooth on leaf margin * 2; D, female flower x 8; E, male
flower x 4; F, fruiting branch x 1. Artist: Daleen Roodt.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
55
FIGURE 5. — Xymalos monospora showing leaf damage. Photographer: M. Jordaan.
often produced in clusters from old leafless wood (Sim
1907). The fruits are ovoid, smooth, 1 -seeded drupes,
often enclosed by a perianth or a fleshy receptacle, with
a persistent stigma.
Distribution and habitat : Xymalos monospora grows
in Afromontane, scarp or coastal forests, or in grass-
lands associated with forests, in moist areas near water-
courses, from near sea level to above 2 000 m. It occurs
in eastern tropical and southern Africa, from southern
Sudan as far south as the Eastern Cape. Tadesse (2000)
suggests that the species could also occur in Ethiopia
but has not yet been recorded there. Distinctive disjunct
populations occur in the highland forests of Nigeria on
the Gotel Mountains (Aluka Library [http://plants.jstor.
org/]), Cameroon Mountains (Cable & Cheek 1998) and
on the Island of Bioko, formerly Fernando Po (Keay
1954) (Figure 1 ). The range of Xymalos monospora falls
well within the archipelago-like Afromontane Region of
Endemism (White 1978, 1983). This African phytocho-
rion is of special biogeographical and evolutionary sig-
nificance because of its putatively ancient status.
Pollination: Xymalos monospora is wind- or insect
pollinated, but this needs further investigation (Philip-
son 1993). Quantities of pollen are produced by the
male flowers, and most specimens collected possess
male flowers, with very few of the ± 50 specimens in the
National Herbarium, Pretoria, with female flowers.
Leaf damage', there is some damage to the leaves on
± 100 specimens examined, usually in the form of black
patches or holes in the leaf blade (Figure 5). Xymalos
monospora is the host for an unusually large number of
fungal pathogens (Doidge 1950), which are probably the
cause of the damage to the leaves. The leaf edges are
also sometimes eaten away (Figure 3) and the species
is a host for the larva of the butterfly Papilio dardanus
Brown (mocker swallowtail) (Papilionidae) (Picker et al.
2004; butterflycorner website [en.butteiflycomer.net]).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Hester Steyn for preparing the
distribution map, and the artist Daleen Roodt for the line
drawing.
REFERENCES
ANDREWS, F.W. 1950. The flowering plants of the Anglo-Egyptian
Sudan 1 . Buncle, Scotland.
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG III). 2009. An update
of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders
and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of
the Linnean Society 161: 105—121.
BAILLON, H.E. 1887. Sur une Bixacee a ovaire uniloculaire et unio-
vule. Bulletin Mensuel de la Societe Linneenne de Paris 1: 650.
BAKER, J.G. & WRIGHT, C.H. 1909. Monimiaceae. In W.T. Thisel-
ton-Dyer, Flora of tropica l Africa 6, 1 : 1 67-17 1 . Reeve, London.
BENTHAM, G. 1 878. Notes on Euphorbiaceae. Journal of the Linnean
Society 17: 185-267.
BOON, R. 2010. Pooley’s, trees of eastern South Africa: a complete
guide. Flora and Fauna Publication Trust, Durban.
56
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
CABLE, S. & CHEEK, M. 1998. The plants of Mount Cameroon. A
conservation checklist. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
CAVACO, A.J.L. 1949. Xymalos mossambicensis. Bulletin de la Societe
Bot unique de France 96: 45.
COATES PALGRAVE, M. 2002. Keith Coates Palgrave Trees of south-
ern Africa, revised edn 3. Struik, Cape Town.
DA SILVA, M.C., IZIDINE, S. & AMUDE, B. 2004. A preliminary
checklist of the vascular plants of Mozambique. South African
Botanical Diversity Network Report Flo. 30: 1-183. SABONET,
Pretoria.
DOIDGE, E.M. 1950. The South African fungi and lichens. Bothalia
5: 5-1094.
DRUMMOND, R.B. 1975. A list of trees, shrubs and woody climbers
indigenous or naturalised in Rhodesia. Kirkia 10: 229-285.
ENDRESS, P.K. & IGERSHEIM, A. 1997. Gynoecium diversity and
systematics of the Laurales. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 125: 93-168.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1895. Lauraceae. Die Pflanzemvelt Ost-Afrikas und
der Nachbargebiete C: 182. Reimer, Berlin.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1900. Berichte iiber die botanischen Ergebnisse der
Nyassa-See- und Kinga-Gebirgs-Expedition. Botanische Jahr-
biicherlS: 332-510.
ENGLER. H.G.A. 1901. Beitrage zur Flora von Afrika. Berichte iiber
die botanischen Ergebnisse der Nyassa-See- und Kinga-Gebirgs-
Expedition. Botanische Jahrbucher 30: 239^445.
ENGLER, H.G.A. 1915. Monimiaceae. Die Pflanzemvelt ‘ Afrikas ins-
besondere seiner tropischen Gebiete 3,1: 219. Engelmann, Leip-
zig.
FOU1LLOY, R. 1974. Monimiaceae. In C. Cusset, Flore du Cameroun
18: 107-116. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
GIBBS, L.S. 1917. Trimeniaceae. A contribution to the phytogeography
and flora of the Arfak mountains. Taylor & Francis, London.
HARVEY, W.H. 1 863. Thesaurus Capensis 2. Hodges & Smith, Dublin.
HICKEY, L.J. & WOLFE, J.A. 1975. The base of angiosperm phytog-
eny: vegetative morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden 62: 538-589.
HUTCHINSON, J. 1973. Trimeniaceae. The families of flowering
plants , edn 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
JORDAAN, M. 2000. Monimiaceae. In O.A. Leistner, Seed plants of
southern Africa: families and genera. Strelitzia 10: 414. National
Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
JORDAAN, M. 2003. Monimiaceae. In G. Germishuizen & N.L. Meyer,
Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14:
743. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.
JUSSIEU, A.L. DE. 1809. Memoire sur les Monimiees, nouvel ordre
de plantes. Annales du Museum National d'FIistoire Naturelle,
Paris 14: 116-135.
KEAY, R.W.J. 1954. Monimiaceae. In J. Hutchinson & J.M. Dalziel,
Flora of West tropical Africa , 2nd revised edn, vol. 1,1: 54, 55.
Crown Agents for Oversea Government and Administrations,
London.
KLOPPER, R.R., CHATELAIN, C„ BANNINGER, V., HABASH1, C.,
STEYN, H.M., DE WET, B.C., ARNOLD, T.H., GAUTIER, L„
SMITH, G.F. & SPICHIGER, R. 2006. Checklist of the flow-
ering plants of sub-Saharan Africa. South African Botanical
Diversity Network Report No. 42. SABONET, Pretoria.
LEINFELLNER. W. 1966. Ober die Karpelle verschiedener Magno-
liales, II. Xymalos, Hedycarya und Siparuna (Monimiaceae).
Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 113: 448 — 458.
LEONARD, J. 1951. Monimiaceae. In Flore du Congo Beige et du
Ruanda-Urundi 2: 400—402. Bruxelles.
LORENCE, D.H. 1985. A monograph of the Monimiaceae (Laurales)
in the Malagasy region (Southwest Indian Ocean). Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden 72: 1—165.
LOTTER, M. 2002. Monimiaceae. In E. Schmidt, M. Lotter & W.
McCleland, Trees and shrubs of Mpumalanga and Kruger
National Park. Jacana, Johannesburg.
MABBERLEY, D.J. 2008. Mabberley's plant-book: A portable diction-
ary of the vascular plants, edn 3. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
McNEILL, .1., BARRIE, F.R., BURDET, H.M., DEMOULIN, V.,
HAWKSWORTH. D.L., MARHOLD, K„ NICOLSON, D.H.,
PRADO, J., SILVA, PC., SKOG, J.E., WIERSEMA, J.H. &
TURLAND, N.J. (eds.). 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Vienna Code) Adopted by the Seven teeth Interna-
tional Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Gantner
Verlag, Ruggell, Liechtenstein. [Regnum Vegetabile 146].
MOONEY, L.L., BAILEY, I.W. & SWAMY, B.G.L. 1950. The mor-
phology and relationships of the Monimiaceae. Journal of the
Arnold Arboretum 31: 372-M04.
OLI VER, D. 1 896. Xymalos monospora. In Hooker s leones Plantarum
25: t. 2444.
PEIXOTO, A.L. & PEREIRA-MOURA, M.V.L. 2008. A new genus of
Monimiaceae from the Atlantic Coastal Forest in south-eastern
Brazil. Kew Bulletin 63: 137-141.
PERKINS, J. & GILG, E. 1911. Monimiaceae. In A. Engler, Das Pflan-
zenreich IV, 101: 1-22. Engelmann, Leipzig.
PHILIPSON, W.R. 1986. Monimiaceae. Flora Malesiana, Series 1, vol.
10: 255-326. Nijhoff, Leiden.
PHILIPSON, W.R. 1987. A classification of the Monimiaceae. Nordic
Journal of Botany 7: 25-29.
PHILIPSON, W.R. 1993. Monimiaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J.G. Rohwer &
V. Bittrich, The families and genera of vascular plants 2: 426-
437. Spinger- Verlag, Berlin.
PICKER, M., GRIFFITHS, C. & WEAVING, A. 2004. Field guide to
insects of South Africa. Struik, Cape Town.
POOLEY, E. 1993. The complete field guide to trees of Natal, Zululand
& Transkei. Natal Flora Publications Trust.
RENNER, S.S. 1998. Phylogenetic affinities of Monimiaceae based on
cplDNA gene and spacer sequences. Perspectives in Plant Ecol-
ogy, Evolution and Systematics 1 : 61—77.
RENNER, S.S. 1999. Circumscription and phytogeny of the Laurales:
evidence from molecular and morphological data. American
Journal of Botany 86: 1301-1315.
RENNER, S.S. & CHANDERBALI, A.S. 2000. What is the relation-
ship among Hernandiaceae, Lauraceae, and Monimiaceae, and
why is this question so difficult to answer? International Journal
of Plant Science 161, suppl. : S 1 09— S 119.
RENNER, S.S., STRIJK, J.S., STRASBERG, D. & THEBAUD, C.
2010. Biogeography of the Monimiaceae (Laurales): a role for
East Gondwana and long-distance dispersal, but not West Gond-
wana. Journal of Biogeography 37: 1227-1238.
ROMANOV, M.S., ENDRESS, P.K., BOBROV, A.V.F.CH., MELIKI-
AN, A.P. & BEJERANO, A.P. 2007. Fruit structure and system-
atics of Monimiaceae s.s. (Laurales). Botanical Journal of the
Linnean Society > 153: 265-285.
SIM, T.R. 1 907. The forests and forest flora of the Colony of the Cape of
Good Hope. Taylor & Henderson, Aberdeen.
STANNARD. B.L. 1997. Monimiaceae. In G.V. Pope, Flora zambesi-
aca 9, 2: 42^14. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
TADESSE, M. 2000. Monimiaceae. In S. Edwards, M. Tadesse, D. Seb-
sebe & I. Hedberg, Flora of Ethiopia & Eritrea 2, 1 : 13. Depart-
ment of Systematic Botany, Uppsala, Sweden.
THORNE, R.F. 1974. A phylogenetic classification of the Annoniflora.
Aliso 8: 147-209.
THUNBERG, C.P. 1 796. Konglinga Vetenskaps Academiens Nya Han-
dlingar: 188. t. 7.
VAN WYK, A.E. (Braam) & VAN WYK, P. 1997. Field guide to trees
of southern AfHca. Struik, Cape Town.
VERDCOURT, B. 1968. Monimiaceae. In R.M. Polhill, Flora of tropi-
cal East Africa: 1-3. Crown Agents for Oversea Governments
and Administrations, London.
WARBURG, O. 1893. Flacourtiaceae. In A. Engler & K. Pranti, Die
natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien 3,6a: 1-56. Engelmann, Leipzig.
WHITE, F. 1978. The Afromontane Region. In M.J.A. Werger, Bioge-
ography and ecology of southern Afi-ica. Junk, The Hague.
WHITE, F. 1983. The Vegetation of Afi-ica: a descriptive memoir to
accompany the UNESCO, AETFAT, UNSO vegetation map of
Africa, Paris.
WRIGHT, C.H. 1912. Monimiaceae. In W.T. Thiselton-Dyer, Flora
capensis 5,1 : 492, 493. Reeve, London.
Websites accessed:
ALUKA LIBRARY, http://plants.jstor.org/ (accessed July 201 1 ).
ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY WEBSITE (APweb). www.mobot.org/
MOBOT/Research/APweb/ (accessed July 2011).
BUTTERFLYCORNER WEBSITE, http://en.butterflycorner.net/ (ac-
cessed September 2009).
INTERNATIONAL PLANT NAMES INDEX [IPNI], Published on the
Internet http://www.ipni.org/ (accessed July 2011).
M. JORDAAN* & M. LOTTER **
* National Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X 1 0 1 , 0001, Pretoria, t Student affiliation: Department of
Plant Science, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria.
** Scientific Services, Mpumalanga Tourism & Parks Agency, Private
Bag XI 088, Lydenburg, 1 120.
MS. received: 2010-10-21.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
57
ASTERACEAE
BERKHEYA JARDINEANA (ARCTOT1DEAE — GORTERIINAE), A NEW DWARF PERENNIAL FROM THE SWARTRUGGENS,
WESTERN CAPE
Berkheva Ehrh., a genus of ± 80 species centred in
southern Africa, was last revised by Roessler (1959)
but many species remain poorly known; to some extent
at least because of the challenges posed to collectors by
these often viciously spinescent plants. Berkheva is dis-
tinguished by its shrubby or perennial habit, spinescent
involucral bracts, mostly radiate (rarely discoid) capit-
ula, ± deeply alveolate receptacle with uniformly thin-
walled cavities, and pappus of ± 20 denticulate scales
in one or two rows (Roessler 1959; Bremer 1994). The
genus is polyphyletic as currently defined (Funk & Chan
2008; Funk et al. 2008; Karis et al. 2009), with a prelim-
inary molecular analysis of the subtribe nesting the gen-
era Culliimia R.Br. ex Aiton, Cuspidia Gaertn., Didelta
L’Her. and Heterorachis Sch.Bip. ex Walp. in various
parts of Berkheva. Substantial revision of generic cir-
cumscription is required to render it monophyletic.
Of 23 species of Berkheya recorded from the core
Cape Floristic Region, 16 are endemic (Goldblatt &
Manning 2000; Manning et al. 2010), including the
recently described B. chrysanthemoides J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt from the Bokkeveld Mountains (Manning et
al. 2010). Here we describe another novelty discovered
in 2009 on the Swartruggens northeast of Ceres.
Berkheya jardineana J.C. Manning & Goldblatt , sp.
nov.
TYPE. — Western Cape, 3219 (Wuppertal); Knolfon-
tein, Swartruggens, 60 km NE of Ceres, (-DC), 26 Oct.
201 1, 7. Jardine 1738 (NBG, holo.; MO, S, iso.).
Dwarf, tufted perennial to 10 cm high at flowering,
forming small clumps from branching, woody rhizome;
stems erect, cobwebby or thinly felted, flushed purple.
Leaves crowded at base of stems, basal foliage leaves
spathulate in outline, softly leathery, blade suborbicu-
lar, 15-35 mm diam., weakly folded along midline and
coarsely 7- or 9-dentate, primary teeth excurrent in pale,
relatively soft spine ± 3 mm long, with smaller second-
ary and tertiary antrorse spines 1-2 mm long between
primary spines, cobwebbed or thinly felted on both sur-
faces and with scattered minute, gland-tipped hairs, gla-
brescent above, veins raised beneath, narrowed into pet-
iole-like base 15-25 mm long, more densely cobwebbed
than blade; cauline leaves smaller, lanceolate, 10-20 *
3- 6 mm, sessile and weakly amplexicaul, weakly 3- or
4- jugate, teeth excurrent into soft spines ± 3 mm long
and with 1 or 2 smaller antrorse spines along margins
between primary spines, thinly felted on both surfaces
and with scattered minute, gland-tipped hairs. Capitula
1-3 in shortly pedunculate racemes, discoid, 25^-0 mm
across involucre and 1 5-20 mm across disc; involu-
cral bracts 4- or 5-seriate, bracts basally connate for ±
5 mm, patent-reflexed, narrowly lanceolate, flat, apex
excurrent in a yellowish spine 2-3 mm long, outer and
median series with 3-5 pairs of patent spines similar to
apical spine, outer surface thinly cobwebbed and with
minute, gland-tipped hairs, innermost bracts with 1-3
pairs of spines in distal half grading into several antrorse
spinules in basal half, glabrous except towards apex,
outer one or two series mostly 6-8 x 2-3 mm, median
two series 10-12 x 3 mm, inner series oblong-lanceo-
late, 5-6 x 1 .5 mm; receptacle deeply alveolate, margins
irregularly fimbriate with straw-like spinules 0. 5-1.0
mm long. Corolla funnel-shaped, yellow, densely glan-
dular-pubescent on tube and more sparsely along lobe
margins, ± 7 mm long, tube ±3.5 mm long, lobes erect,
narrowly lanceolate, ± 3.5 mm long, penicillate. Sta-
mens: anthers tailed, with lanceolate apical appendage,
± 4 mm long; endothecial cells with inner periclinal wall
thickenings not evidently displaced. Achenes turbinate,
± 2.5 mm long, 10-ribbed, those of outer florets densely
antrorsely pubescent with short, twin hairs but inner
achenes progressively more glabrous. Pappus scales
sub-biseriate, ± 20, oblong-obovate, denticulate, outer
series slightly shorter than inner, 1.0-1. 5 x 0.5 mm. Pol-
len lophate. Flowering time: Oct.-Dec. Figure 1.
Distribution and ecology: known so far only from
the Farm Knolfontein on the Swartruggens, a semi-arid
mountain range 60 km east of Ceres at the eastern mar-
gin of the Cape Floristic Region (Figure 2). The spe-
cies is locally common on sandy flats in areas of dry,
rocky sandstone soils, mostly in full sun. It appears to
be highly localized; although several subpopulations are
known, they are all within approximately 1 km of one
another.
Diagnosis and relationships: this petite species is dis-
tinguished in the genus by its diminutive size and curi-
ous growth form, developing into small, multi-stemmed
clumps or low cushions through branching of the woody
underground stem. The leaves are clustered at the base
of the aerial stems, which reach only to 10 cm high at
flowering, later elongating to 15 cm in fruit. The basal
foliage leaves are highly distinctive, being softly leath-
ery and spathulate in outline with a coarsely toothed,
suborbicular blade only weakly armed with pale, rela-
tively soft-textured spines. Both surfaces are thinly cob-
webby-felted. The species is not pyrophytic and the low
growth form is likely an adaptation to its exposed habi-
tat.
The rosulate habit, relatively small, discoid capitula,
and sub-biseriate pappus of small obtuse scales place
Berkheya jardineana in ser. Rigidae (Roessler 1959).
Other members of the series are larger perennial herbs or
shrubs with pinnatifid or lobed leaves.
Etymology*: the species is named for Ivor and Cora
Jardine, who first collected specimens in 2009. They
have devoted many years to documenting the flora of the
Swartruggens (Jardine & Jardine 2010), in the course of
which they have discovered several novelties, including
Hesperantha lithicola Goldblatt & J.C. Manning (Iri-
daceae) and Trieenea occulta J.C. Manning & Goldblatt
(Scrophulariaceae).
58
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 1 .- Berkheya jardineana, Jardine 1738 (NBG). A, Plant; B, foliage leaf; C, involucral bracts (outermost on left, innermost on right); D,
outer floret showing puberulous ovary and pappus of small, obtuse scales, plus portion of alveole margin; E, achenes (outer on left, inner on
right) ( Jardine 1747). Scale bar: A, B, 10 mm; C, 8 mm; D, E, 2 mm. Artist: John Manning.
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
59
Additional specimens seen
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Knolfontein, Swartrug-
gens, 60 km NE of Ceres, 1 201 m, (-DC), 26 Oct. 2009, Jardine &
Jardine 570 (NBG); 21 Nov. 2011, Jardine 1747 (NBG); 12 Dec.
201 1, Jardine 1761 (NBG); 14 Dec. 2011 , Jardine 1766 (NBG).
REFERENCES
BREMER, K. 1994. Asteraceae, cladistics and classification. Timber
Press, Portland, Oregon.
FUNK, V.A. & R. CHAN. 2008. Phylogeny of the spiny African daisies
(Compositae, tribe Arctotideae, subtribe Gorteriinae) based on
trnL-F , ndhF , and ITS sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution 48: 47-60.
FUNK, V.A., CHAN, R. & KEELEY, S.C. 2008. Insights into the evolu-
tion of the tribe Arctoteae (Compositae: subfamily Chicorioideae
s.s.) using trnL-F, ndhF, and ITS. Taxon 53: 637-655.
GOLDBLATT, P. & J.C. MANNING. 2000. Cape Plants: A Conspectus
of the Cape Flora. Strelitzia 9. National Botanical Institute &
Missouri Botanical Garden.
JARDINE, 1. & JARDINE, C. 2010. Four seasons on the Swartruggens.
Veld & Flora 96: 179-181.
KARIS, P.O., FUNK, V.A., MCKENZIE, R.J., BARKER, N.P. & R.
CHAN. 2009. Arctotideae. In: Systematics, Evolution and Bioge-
ography of Compositae , Funk, V.A., A. Susanna, T. Stuessy, arid
R. Bayer (Eds.), I APT, Vienna, Austria, pp. 285-3 10.
MANNING, J.C., KARIS, P.O. GOLDBLATT, P. & HELME, N.A.
2010. Berkheya chrysanthemoides and Heterorachis hystrix , two
new species of Arctotideae-Gorteriinae (Asteraceae) from the
southwestern Cape. Bothalia 40: 219-224.
ROESSLER, H. 1959. Revision der Arctotideae-Gorteriinae (Compo-
sitae). Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung Mimchen
3: 71-500.
J.C. MANNING*,** and P. GOLDBLATT***
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town.
** Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
*** B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
MS. received: 2012-01-03.
ASTERACEAE
OSTEOSPERMUM NORLINDHIANUM AND O. NORDENSTA MIL TWO NEW SPECIES OF OSTEOSPERMUM SECT. TREFENESTRATAE
(CALENDULEAE) FROM THE GREATER CAPE FLORISTIC REGION
Calendulae is a small tribe of ± 120 spp. with a
marked centre of diversity in southern Africa, where
± 80% of the species occur (Nordenstam & Kallersjo
2009). Available phylogenetic analyses (Nordenstam
1994, 2006; Nordenstam & Kallersjo 2009) retrieve
Garuleum Cass, and Dimorphotheca Vaill. ex Moench
as two early-branching lineages, with no question about
their taxonomic status. Generic delimitation within the
remainder of the tribe, however, remains unsatisfac-
tory (Manning & Goldblatt 2008). The species are cur-
rently segregated among ten genera: Calendula L. (± 15
spp.), Chrysanthemoides Fabr. (2 spp.), Gibbaria Cass.
(2 spp.), Inuloides B.Nord. (1 sp.), Monoculus B.Nord.
(2 spp.), Nephrotheca B.Nord. & Kallersjo (1 sp.), Nor-
lindhia B.Nord. (3 spp.), Oligocarpus Less. (2 spp.),
Osteospennum L. (± 45 spp.) and Tripteris Less.
(20 spp.) (Nordenstam 2007; Nordenstam & Kallersjo
2009). In spite of recent generic fragmentation both
Osteospermum and Tripteris remain polyphyletic (Nor-
denstam & Kallersjo 2009), necessitating the recognition
of additional genera if this treatment is to be carried to
its logical conclusion.
In practical terms, few synapomorphies are avail-
able for the recognition of these new segregates, most
of which are mono- or oligotypic, and it is unfortunate
that dismemberment of the group has been implemented
piecemeal and in advance of a well-sampled and well-
supported analysis of the tribe. Even with the very nar-
row circumscription of Tripteris proposed by Norden-
stam (2007) to include just those species with winged,
apically3-fenestrate achenes, the molecular analysis in
Nordenstam & Kallersjo (2009) still locates taxa with
other kinds of achenes (among them the genus Monocu-
lus) among typical Tripteris species, rendering the latter
polyphyletic.
The alternative, and in our opinion more useful treat-
ment from both a practical and theoretical perspective
(Manning & Goldblatt 2008), is to adopt a synthetic
view of Osteospermum as constituting the monophyletic
clade sister to Dimorphotheca as resolved in the phy-
logenetic analyses presented by Nordenstam (2006) and
Nordenstam & Kallersjo (2009), thus including the gen-
era Calendula, Chrysanthemoides, Gibbaria, Inuloides,
Monoculus, Nephrotheca, Norlindhia, Oligocarpus and
Tripteris. Segregate lineages within Osteospermum sens,
lat. are then usefully treated at sectional level, as was
initiated by Norlindh (1943) in the last comprehensive
revision of the tribe in sub-Saharan Africa. Although
the current sectional boundaries clearly require sub-
stantial revision in the light of modem phylogenetic
analyses, shuffling of species among them will have no
impact on the nomenclature. This is the treatment that
60
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
has been adopted in the two floras treating the species
of the Greater Cape Floristic Region (Manning & Gold-
blatt, in press; Snijman in press.) and we follow it here
in describing two new species of Osteospermum subg.
Tripteris (Less.) T.Norl. from the semi-arid parts of the
Greater Cape Floristic Region.
Osteospermum sect. Trifenestratae T.Norl. [as Trife-
nestrata\, which coincides with the narrow definition of
the genus Tripteris (sensu Nordenstam 2007), comprises
± 18 species of perennial herbs, subshrubs or shrubs
widely distributed through Africa, with some 7 species
endemic to the winter rainfall parts of South Africa and
southern Namibia. It is diagnosed by 3-winged achenes
with all three sides of the apical airchamber thin-walled
and translucent (‘fenestrate') (Norlindh 1943). Here we
describe two new species in the section. Osteospermum
norlindhianum from the Cold Bokkeveld resembles
O. dentation Burnt. f. from sandy flats along the West
Coast of Western Cape in its herbaceous, perennial habit
and its heteromorphic achenes but differs in details of
the foliage and fruit. It had been recognized as distinct
by Norlindh during the preparation of his monograph of
the tribe (Norlindh 1943) but it is only now that fruit-
ing material has become available. O. nordenstamii from
quartz fields in southern Namaqualand, is a recently dis-
covered, gnarled dwarf shrublet with consistently oppo-
site, basally connate leaves, suggesting a relationship
with the common Namaqualand shrub, O. oppositifolium
(Aiton) T.Norl.
Osteospermum norlindhianum J.C. Manning &
Goldblatt , sp. nov.
TYPE.— WESTERN CAPE, 3219 (Wupper-
tal): Swartruggens, Knolfontein 60 km NE of Ceres,
32°50'49.7"S, 1 9°37'20.8"E, l 260 m, (-DC), 26 Oct.
2011 , /. Jardine 1729 (NBG, holo.; MO, S, iso.).
Tufted perennial from woody crown, 300-450 mm
high, caudex producing a cluster of annual flowering
stems; flowering stems suberect, laxly branched, 2-3
mm diam. at base, pubescent with mix of straggling,
eglandular hairs and short, gland-tipped hairs, flushed
purple at base. Leaves congested basally, lowermost sub-
opposite with bases imbricate but not connate, becom-
ing alternate distal ly as internodes lengthen, decreasing
in size acropetally and ultimately grading into linear-
subulate bracts, lower leaves oblanceolate, mostly 40-90
x 6-9 mm, leathery, sparsely to densely pubescent with
mix of acute, eglandular hairs and gland-tipped hairs,
adaxial surface ± asperulous, abaxial surface ± glan-
dular-pubescent intermixed with scattered, straggling,
eglandular hairs, these longer and denser along margins,
blade tapering below into long, petiole-like base, mid-
rib prominent abaxial ly, margins sparsely and weakly
dentate, apiculate. Capitula heterogamous, radiate, ± 20
mm diam., on slender, branched peduncles forming lax,
compound corymbs, nodding in fruit; involucre shal-
lowly campanulate, 7-8 mm diam.; involucral bracts
12-15, sub-uniseriate, lanceolate, 3. 5-4.0 x 1.0-1. 5
mm, acute, densely glandular-pubescent, with scarious
margins 0.25-0.50 mm wide; receptacle flat, glabrous.
Ray florets female-fertile, 8-10; tube sparsely glandular-
pubescent, ± 1 mm long; lamina spreading but recoil-
ing in afternoon, narrowly elliptic, 4-veined, ± 3 x as
long as involucre, 9-10 x 3 mm, bright yellow, some-
times flushed reddish abaxially. Anthers vestigial, free,
reduced to 4 subulate staminodes ± 0.8 mm long, yellow.
Ovary obovoid, 3-angled, ± 2 mm long, densely glandu-
lar-puberulous; style terete, branching ± 0.5 mm above
mouth of tube, branches narrowly elliptic-lanceolate,
obtuse, ± 1 mm long, yellow, lateral margins stigmatic.
Achenes heteromorphic in some capitula, 3-winged or
unwinged: winged achenes 10-12 x 7-8 mm, body tur-
binate, ± 7 mm long, transversely ribbed and glandular-
scabrid, with cylindrical, apical, trifen-estrate aircham-
ber, windows ovate, ± 2.5 x 2.0 mm, wings translucent,
2-3 mm wide but sometimes one or two only partially
developed; unwinged achenes 0-3, fusiform-rostrate,
10-12 x 1.5 mm, glandular-pubescent, body purplish,
rostrum and stipe greenish. Disc florets functionally
male, numerous; corolla narrowly funnel-shaped, ± 3
mm long, yellow; tube glandular-hairy, ± 2 mm long;
lobes suberect, triangular, ± 1 mm long. Anthers 2 mm
long, yellow; base tailed, tails equalling filament collar;
apical appendage ovate. Ovary ± terete, ± 1.5 mm long,
glandular-pubescent; style terete, on short stylopodium,
shortly bifid, lobes deltoid, acutely papillate with basal
fringe of longer trichomes. Flowering time : Sept.-May.
Figures 1; 3A-C.
Distribution and ecology, restricted to the drier, east-
ern edge of the Cedarberg and Cold Bokkeveld, where
it has been recorded from Matjiesrivier in the south-
ern Cedarberg and the Skurweberg and Swartruggens
ranges in the Cold Bokkeveld (Figure 2) between 1 000
and 1 260 m. The species is a component of arid fynbos
communities on the drier, hotter, northern slopes and the
plants, like many species in the genus, are highly aro-
matic.
Diagnosis and relationhips: Osteospermum norlindh-
ianum belongs to the small group of species in sect.
Trifenestratae that includes O. dentatum and O. conna-
tum DC. and that is characterized by a tufted, perennial
habit with the lower leaves congested and opposite or
subopposite, and annual flowering stems developing lax,
corymbose synflorescences of moderately-sized capitula
with the tendency to produce dimorphic achenes. Most
fruits develop three conspicuous wings but in some
heads up to half of the achenes are unwinged and fusi-
form-rostrate, with reduced or obsolete apical windows.
In this group, O. connatum from the Cedarberg is dis-
tinctive in its mostly subsessile, semi-amplexicaul or
conspicuously auriculate leaves, and relatively small
winged achenes, 5-6 mm long. Both O. norlindhianum
and O. dentatum (Figure 4) from sandy coastal flats
between Saldanha and Hermanus (Figure 2), in contrast,
have leaves narrowed to a petiole-like base and larger
achenes, 9-12 mm long, and the two are superficially
very similar.
Apart from their eco-geographical separation, the
two species are distinguished by details of their foliage
and fruits. The leaves of O. norlindhianum are oblan-
ceolate without basal auricles, mostly 6-9 mm wide and
obscurely toothed, with scattered, relatively long, strag-
gling eglandular hairs on the underside and also along
the margins, rendering them ± ciliate; the involucral
bracts are glandular-puberulous with scarious margins
0.25-0.50 mm wide (Figure 3A); and the seed body in
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
61
COMPTON HERBARIUM
'NBG02695S7 -0'
COMPTON HERBARIUM
NATIONAL BOTANICAL INSTITUTE, KIRSTEN0OSCH, CAPE TOWN
FIGURE 1. — Osteospermum norlindhianum, Swartruggens, Jardine 1729 (NBG).
62
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 2. — Distribution of Osteospermum dentatum , o; O. nor-
lindhianum, • ; O. nordenstamii, A.
the winged achenes is conspicuously glandular-scabrid
and ± turbinate, with a broadly cylindrical distal third
containing the air chamber, a broadly ovoid and trans-
versely ribbed central section with a median longitudi-
nal sulcus, and an abruptly narrowed slender basal third
(Figure 3B). The leaves of O. dentatum are oblong to
obovate and generally broader, 10-20 mm wide, mostly
with basal auricles, and usually more coarsely toothed
or lacerate, with both surfaces and the margins scabrid-
ulous with short, stiff eglandular hairs; the involucral
bracts are scabridulous with narrow scarious margins
0.10-0.25 mm wide (Figure 3D); and the fruit body is
smoothly ellipsoid and subglabrous, with a median lon-
gitudinal sulcus through the entire distal two thirds (Fig-
ure 3E).
Hilliard & Burtt (1985) commented on the spatial/
altitudinal separation within species pairs in Calenduleae
in O. attenuation Hilliard & Burtt (± 1 675 to 2 300 m)
and O. grandidentatum DC. (sea level to ± 1 500 m);
and in Dimorphotheca fruticosa (L.) B.Nord. (near sea
level) and D. caulescens (Harv.) Harv. (± 1 650 m). The
new O. norlindhianum (± 1 000 to 1 260 m) and O. den-
tatum (near sea level) constitute a third example of this.
Etymology, named for Tycho Norlindh, whose mon-
ograph on the sub-Saharan members of the tribe (Nor-
lindh 1943) remains current. Norlindh also correctly
annotated the flowering collection Esterhuysen 12709
(BOL) as representing an unnamed species related to
O. dentatum but was prevented from formally describ-
ing and naming it by the lack of fruits. The species was
recently re-collected, in flower and in fruit, by Ivor and
Cora Jardine during their survey of their property in the
Swartruggens.
Additional specimens seen
WESTERN CAPE. — 3219 (Wuppertal): Cedarberg, Matjiesrivier
Nature Reserve, above Easter Cave, 950 m, 32°28'38"S, 19°22'43"E,
(-AD), 24 Apr. 1996, Lechmere-Oerte l 15 (NBG); Matjiesrivier
Nature reserve, W of Zuurfontein west gate, 1 000 m, 32°27'S, 19°24'E
(-AD), 5 Oct. 1997, Lechmer-Oertel 873 (NBG); rocky ridge above
Winkelhaaks River, E of Bokkeveld Sneeukop, (-CD), 20 Apr. 1946,
Esterhuysen 12709 (BOL); Swartruggens, Knolfontein, 60 km NE of
Ceres, 1 259 m, 32°50'58.2"S, 19°37'25.4"E, (-DC), 11 Feb. 2009,
Jardine & Jardine 1093 (NBG).
Osteospermum nordenstamii J.C. Manning & Gold-
blatt, sp. nov.
TYPE. — Northern Cape, 3017 (Hondeklipbaai):
Riethuis quartz fields, 100 m E of road to Kommagas
from Riethuis, 30°04'52.5"S, 17°26'08.7"E, 170 m, (-
AB), 24 Aug. 2011, Helme 7342 (NBG, holo.).
Gnarled, dwarf shrublet to 100 mm high, flowering
on densely leafy short-shoots; vegetative shoots pros-
trate and laxly leafy with intemodes 10-15 mm long,
stems smooth and weakly compressed when young and
flushed reddish, ± 2 mm diam., glabrescent with thinly
scattered, eglandular hairs, developing a pale brown-
ish, corky bark, greyish and rectangularly fissured when
old, 3^1 mm diam. Leaves opposite, decussate, suberect,
oblanceolate, (9—) 1 5—3 0(— 3 5 ) x (3-)4-8 mm, sessile,
connate for up to 3 mm and shortly sheathing at base
of short shoots, obtuse or rarely apiculate, leathery or
sub-succulent, pubescent when young with mix of strag-
gling, eglandular hairs and short, gland-tipped hairs,
especially along margins but subglabrous when fully
expanded, densely woolly in axils, adaxial surface flat
or shallowly concave, margins yellowish-translucent and
homy, prominent when dry, abaxial midrib prominent
basally and decurrent on stem. Capitula heterogamous,
radiate, ± 25 mm diam., shortly pedunculate, solitary
and terminal on short shoots, rarely a second capitulum
developing from an axillary shoot near apex, nodding in
fruit; peduncles 15-25 mm long and 0.5-0. 8 mm diam.
but up to 1.0 mm diam. in fruit, leafless but with 1 or
2 scattered, linear-subulate bracts 3-5 mm long, thinly
pubescent with a mix of straggling, eglandular hairs
and short, gland-tipped hairs, flushed purple; involu-
cre shallowly campanulate, ± 10 mm diam.; involucral
bracts 15-17, sub-uniseriate or biseriate, lanceolate, 5-6
x 1. 5-2.0 mm, acute, ± glabrous or thinly puberulous
with scattered gland-tipped hairs, with scarious margins
0.3-0. 5 mm wide; receptacle flat, glabrous. Ray florets
female-fertile, 20 to 22, tube glandular-pubescent, ± 1
mm long, lamina spreading but recoiling in afternoon,
narrowly elliptic, 4-veined, ± twice as long as involu-
cre, 11-12 x 4 mm, dull yellow; anthers vestigial, free,
reduced to 4 subulate staminodes, yellow; style terete,
branching ± I mm above mouth of tube, branches nar-
rowly elliptic-lanceolate, obtuse, ± 1.5 mm long, yellow,
lateral margins stigmatic; ovary obovoid, 3-angled, ± 2
mm long, glandular-pubescent; achenes homomorphic,
3-winged, 10-12 x 8-10 mm, body narrowly turbinate,
± 7 mm long, subglabrous or sparsely glandular-pubes-
cent, with apical, trifenestrate airchamber, windows sub-
rotund, ± 1 mm diam., wings translucent, flushed purple,
3^1 mm wide. Disc florets functionally male, numerous;
corolla narrowly funnel-shaped, ± 4 mm long, yellow
tipped blackish; tube glandular-pubescent, ± 3 mm long;
lobes suberect, triangular, ± 1 mm long; anthers 2 mm
long, dark purple with yellow filaments; base tailed, tails
equalling filament collar; apical appendage ovate. Ovaty
compressed-ovoid with lateral ribs, ± I mm long, gla-
brous; style terete, bifid, lobes deltoid, acutely papillate
with basal fringe of longer trichomes. Flowering time :
July-Sept. Figures 3F, G; 5; 6.
Distribution and ecology, restricted to the coastal
plain of southern Namaqualand, where it has been col-
lected northeast and southeast of Riethuis in Northern
Cape, and near Koekenaap and Vredendal in West-
ern Cape (Figure 2). Osteospermum nordenstamii is
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
63
[
F
FIGURE 3. — Achenes and involu-
cral bracts. A-C, Osteosper-
mum norlindhianum , Jardine
1729 (NBG); A, involucral
bracts; B, winged achene;
C, wingless achene; D, E,
O. dentatum', D. involucral
bracts [Langebaan, Bosenberg
& Rutherford 89 (NBG)]; E,
winged achene [Wildevoel-
vlei, O 'Callaghan 704
(NBG)]; F, G, O. nordens-
tamii, Helme 7342 (NBG)];
F, involucral bract; G, winged
achene. Scale bar: A, D. F,
1 mm; B, C, E, G, 2 mm. Art-
ist: J.C. Manning.
locally common among white quartz pebbles, mainly (Schmiedel & Jurgens 1999). The two known areas
on north-facing slopes, and is yet another highly local- of occurrence at Koekenaap and Riethuis are some
ized endemic of the Namqualand lowland quartz fields 175 km apart with very little suitable quartz patch habi-
64
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
, ’ j. A
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN.
HERBARIUM AFAICANUM 60LUSIANUM.
hlo«« fax i ,-iv
. , MiOJ
- cx^4*n.i4-nv Oji-x.ta.CjM. *)$Uui y
Life V'iivt;
Fi"' W a.m. y,» u*in^ tffLee,
FIGURE 4. — Qpeospermum dentatum, Kommetjie, Bolus 23203 (NBG).
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
65
FIGURE 5. — Flowering plant of Osteospermum nordenstamii at the
type locality near Riethuis. Photographer: N.A. Helme.
FIGURE 6. — Fruiting plant of Osteospermum nordenstamii at the type
locality near Riethuis Photographer: N.A. Helme.
tat between them. Low rainfall at both places is sup-
plemented by substantial precipitation from coastal fog,
especially in autumn and winter.
At the type locality near Riethuis the species grows
with the locally endemic succulents Drosanthemopsis
vaginata, Meyerophytum meveri, Conophytum conca-
vum and Monilaria globosa (Aizoaceae), and with the
more widespread Hirpicium alienatum (Asteraceae) and
Cheiridopsis robusta (Aizoaceae). An undescribed spe-
cies each of Othonna (Asteraceae) and of Eriospermum
(Ruscaceae) were also recorded in the area. The two
southern localities fall within the Knersvlakte centre of
endemism (Van Wyk & Smith 2001).
Diagnosis and relationships'. Osteospermum norden-
stamii is readily distinguished from all other species by
its dwarf habit (Figures 5 & 6), forming small, gnarled,
± creeping shrublets less than 10 cm high, with decus-
sate, oblanceolate leaves with entire margins, mostly
obtuse apices, and distinctly woolly axils. Plants pro-
duce prostrate or spreading, relatively distantly leafy
vegetative shoots but flower only from closely leafy
short-shoots, which produce solitary, dull-yellow capit-
ula on short, terminal peduncles. The leaves have dis-
tinctive translucent, homy margins especially evident in
dried herbarium material.
The opposite, entire, subglabrous leaves of Oste-
ospermum nordenstamii are otherwise found only in
O. oppositifolium among the species of sect. Trifenes-
tratae, and suggest that its relationships lie here. The
two species are readily separated by their habit and also
by bark, foliage and inflorescence. O. oppositifolium is
common thoughout western Namaqualand as far south
as Clanwilliam, forming colonies on stony and rocky
slopes. It is a rounded shrub, mostly 0. 5-1.0 m high but
occasionally as low as 30 cm, with linear to oblanceo-
late, mostly acute leaves, 20-60 x 2—1 0(— 1 2) mm, with
the margin only weakly thickened and without woolly
axils (rarely a few sparse hairs are present). The stems
develop relatively thin, longitudinally striate bark quite
unlike the corky, quadrately fissured bark of O. nor-
denstamii, and the capitula are typically borne in lax
corymbs at the ends of the branches, not on short shoots.
They are mostly larger than in O. nordenstamii, 25-35
mm diam., and the ray florets vary in colour from rich
golden yellow in Namaqualand to pale yellow in the
Olifants River Valley. Both species have been recorded
at the same locality north of Koekenaap ( Nordenstam
907).
Etymology’: named for Bertil Nordenstam, who has
published extensively on Asteraceae in general and on
the tribe Calendulae in particular, and who first collected
the species in 1962.
Other specimens seen
NORTHERN CAPE. — 3017 (Hondeklipbaai): Riethuis/Oubees,
30°7'49"S, 17°25'20"E, quartz patch, 150 m, (-AB), 24 Aug. 1999,
Desmet 244 (NBG); S of Riethuis on track to Taaibosduin, quartzite
koppie, (-AB), 13 Aug. 2006, Koekemoer 3342 (PRE); along road to
Soebatsfontein from Wallekraal/Hondeklipbaai road, 161 m, (-BC), 16
Sept. 2000, Koekemoer & Funk 1957 (PRE).
WESTERN CAPE.— 31 18 (Vanrhynsdorp): 3 miles [4.8 km] NE of
Koekenaap, (-AD), 15 July 1962, Nordenstam 581 (S); Moedverloor,
4 miles [6.4 km] N of Holrivier Bridge, quartzite fields and patches,
(-AD), 10 Aug. 1962, Nordenstam 907 (S); 4 miles [6.4 km] N of
Koekenaap, quartzite kopje W of road, (-AD), 25 Aug. 1962, Nor-
denstam 1022 (S); 4 km N of Koekenaap, quartzite outrcrop, (-AD),
6 Sept. 1974, Nordenstam & Lundgren 1686 (S); Koekenaap, 31.46°S,
18.31°E, (-AD), without date, Desmet 3636 (NBG); Koekenaap, por-
tion of old Farm 630, 50 m, (-CB), 16 Aug. 1997, Desmet & Ellis
1243 (NBG).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Material was collected under permits from the con-
servation authorities of Northern and Western Cape.
BOL, NBG, PRE and SAM, the main herbaria with
good representation of collections of Cape species, were
consulted for records of the two new species (herbarium
acronyms after Holmgren et al. 1990). We thank cura-
tors of these herbaria for allowing access to their collec-
tions, and the referees for their constructive comments.
REFERENCES
HILLIARD, O.M. & BURTT, B.L. 1985. Notes on some plants of
southern Africa chiefly from Natal XI. Notes from the Royal
Botanic Garden Edinburgh 42: 227-260.
HOLMGREN, P.K., HOLMGREN, N.H. & BARNETT, L.C. 1990.
Index herbariorum. Part. 1 : The herbaria of the World. New
York Botanical Garden, New York.
66
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. 2008. Tripteris calcicola (Aster-
aceae), a new calciphilous species from Western Cape, South
Africa. Bothalia 38: 85-88.
MANNING, J.C. & GOLDBLATT, P. in press. Plants of the Greater
Cape Floristic Region 1 : The Core Cape Flora. Strelitzia #. South
African National Biodivsersity Institute, Pretoria.
NORDENSTAM, B. 1994. New combinations in the Calenduleae.
Compositae Newsletter 25: 46-M9.
NORDENSTAM, B. 2006. Generic revisions in the tribe Calenduleae
(Compositae). Compositae Newsletter 44: 38-49.
NORDENSTAM, B. 2007. Tribe Calenduleae Cass. In J. Kadereit &
C. Jeffrey (vol. eds), K. Kubitzki (series ed.). The families and
genera of vascular plants. VIII Flowering plants-Eudicots-Aste-
rales, pp. 241-245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelburg, New York.
NORDENSTAM, B. & KALLERSJO, M. 2009. Calendulae. In V.A.
Funk, A. Susanna, T.F. Stuessy & R.J. Bayer (eds). Systematics,
Evolution and Biogeography of Compositae'. 293-314. Interna-
tional association for Plant Taxonomy, Vienna.
NORLINDH, T. 1943. Studies in the Calenduleae. I. Monograph of the
genera Dimorphotheca, Castalis, Osteospermum, Gibbaria and
Chrysanthemoides. Bloms, Lund.
SCHMIEDEL, U. & JURGENS, N. 1 999. Community structure on unu-
sual habitat islands: quartz-fields in the Succulent Karoo, South
Africa. Plant Ecology 142: 57-69.
SN1JMAN, D. in press. Plants of the Greater Cape Floristic Region 2:
The Extra-Cape Region. Strelitzia #. South African National
Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
VAN WYK, A.E. & SMITH, G.F. 2001. Regions of floristic endemism
in southern Africa. Umdaus, Hatfield.
J.C. MANNING*,** P. GOLDBLATT*** & N.A. HELME****
* Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute,
Private Bag X7, 7735 Claremont, Cape Town. E-mail: j.manning@
sanbi.org.za.
** Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life
Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag
X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
***B.A. Krukoff Curator of African Botany, Missouri Botanical Gar-
den, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166, USA.
**** P.O. Box 22652, Scarborough 7975, South Africa.
MS. received: 2012-01-24.
Bothalia 42,1: 67-68 (2012)
OBITUARY
EDUARDO JOSE DOS SANTOS MORE1RA MENDES (1924-2011 )
On 24 September 2011, Eduardo Mendes (Figure
1 ) passed away at his home in Lisbon, Portugal, at the
grand old age of 86 — just 2 months short of his 87th
birthday — following a stroke. He was one of the last of a
generation of colonial plant taxonomists who had exper-
tise on the flora of Angola and some of the other former
African colonies of Portugal, and his passing signifies
the end of an era.
Eduardo Jose dos Santos Moreira Mendes was born
in Lisbon on 26 November 1924. He studied in Lisbon
and obtained his first degree in biological sciences in
1946 at the University of Lisbon where he studied under
the tutelage of, among others, the renowned cytogeneti-
cist, Prof. Flavio Resende, who had a special interest
in southern African petaloid monocots, including aloes
and their kin (Smith & Figueiredo 201 la). Mendes was
a botany lecturer at the University of Lisbon from 1 946
to 1954, where he taught courses in the Faculties of Sci-
ences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Medicine. During
that period he developed a research programme on cryp-
togams, and published several papers on this group. In
1954 he was employed as assistant to the project ‘Mis-
sao Botanica de Angola e Mozambique’ and in 1956
became a researcher at the Junta de Investigaqoes do
Ultramar, later superseded by the Instituto de Investi-
gaqao Cientifica Tropical (IICT). From 1974 to 1986,
Mendes was Director of the Centro de Botanica of the
IICT, in Lisbon, Portugal. While Director of the Centro,
he used an interesting way of summoning staff to his
office: a switch on his desk was connected to a bell that
FIGURE 1. — Eduardo Mendes (26 November 1924-24 September
2011) at his home in Lisbon, Portugal. Photograph: Gideon F.
Smith, 23 September 2010.
rang in the Institute’s corridors and each staff member
had a Morse code-style code that, when sounded, meant
that he or she must immediately go to the Director’s
office (Martins 1994).
Throughout his career Mendes maintained an interest
in the floras of Angola and Mozambique, and did con-
siderable work on these. He revised several families for
the Conspectus florae angolensis ; publishing a series of
papers under the title ‘Additiones et Adnotationes Florae
Angolensis’ that continued until 1973. He further revised
several families for the Flora zambesiaca in a set of
papers under the series entitled ‘Additiones et Adno-
tationes Florae Mozambicanae’. During his career he
published over 70 papers and was editor or co-editor of
Conspectus florae angolensis , Flora zambesiaca , Flora
de Mozambique, and Garcia de Orta, Serie Botanica.
Mendes participated in two botanical expeditions
to Angola, during which he collected several thousand
herbarium accessions (Figure 2). The first expedition
that Mendes undertook to Angola took place from Sep-
tember 1955 to March 1956 and focused mostly on the
southwestern parts of the country, where he collected
1 750 numbers (Figure 3). The second expedition took
place between December 1959 and May 1960, mostly
in the southeastern region, between Cuvango and Cuito-
Cuanavale, and resulted in the numbers 1 800 to 4 064
in Mendes’s African collection (Mendes 1980; Martins
1994).
FIGURE 2. — A young, mustachioed Eduardo Mendes photographed in
Angola during the first of the two expeditions he undertook to
the country. Photographer unknown. Reproduced courtesy of the
Mendes family, Lisbon, Portugal.
68
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
FIGURE 3. — A series of tents pitched around the field collecting
vehicle served as shelter during the first of the expeditions that
Mendes undertook to Angola. Photograph: Eduardo Mendes.
Reproduced with the permission of the Instituto de Investiga^ao
Cientifica Tropical, Lisbon, Portugal.
After his retirement from the Centro de Botanica,
Mendes disappeared from the botanical landscape. Two
of the authors (GFS and EF) visited him at his home on
23 September 2010 to obtain information on the prov-
enance of the material on which the name Aloe mendesii
Reynolds (Asphodelaceae), a cliff-dwelling species from
Angola, was based. He was very helpful and vividly
remembered the material, including when and where it
was collected and what happened to it — quite remarka-
bly— over 55 years ago! However, Mendes sadly passed
away one week before the resulting paper appeared in
print (Smith & Figueiredo 201 lb).
The work and collections of Mendes remain lit-
tle known in South Africa as he never collected in the
country as far as we could ascertain, and was therefore
not included in Gunn & Codd’s (1981) benchmark work
on the botanical exploration of southern Africa, and was
only briefly mentioned in Figueiredo & Smith (2008).
However, his collecting activities in Angola contributed
significantly to the primary botanical knowledge of that
country, and some of the specimens that he collected
decades ago are still being used as the types of new
plant names. Sousa et al. (2010), for example, recently
described Cyphostemma mendesii F. Sousa in the Vita-
ceae based on some of Mendes’s Angolan material. Thir-
teen further taxa were described from, and named for,
Eduardo Mendes from collections he made in Angola.
Eleven are currently accepted, including the distinctive
succulent tree Euphorbia eduardoi L.C. Leach, Uvaria
mendesii Paiva, Ceropegia mendesii Stopp, Phyllanthus
mendesii Brunei ex Radcl.-Sm., Adenodolichos mendesii
Torre, Crotalaria mendesii Torre, Indigofera mendesii
Torre, Vigna mendesii Torre, Rotheca mendesii (R.Fem.)
R.Fern., and Aloe mendesii Reynolds.
REFERENCES
FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2008. Plants of Angola / Plantas de
Angola. Strelitzia 22: 1-282. South African National Biodiver-
sity Institute, Pretoria.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. A. A. Balkema, Cape Town.
MARTINS, E.S. 1994. Homenagem a botanicos com colaborafao rele-
vante no Centro de Botanica do IICT. I. Eduardo Mendes. Garcia
de Orta. Serie Botanica, 12: 11-14.
MENDES, E.J. 1980. A Junta de Investigates Cientlficas do Ultramar
e a flora de Africa: Missoes e Centro de Botanica. Boletim da
Sociedade Broteriana, Serie 2 54: 201-215.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2011a. Obituary. Franz Sebastian
Muller (1913-2010). Bothalia 41 : 365-368.
SMITH, G.F. & FIGUEIREDO, E. 2011b. Provenance of the material
on which the name Aloe mendesii Reynolds (Asphodelaceae),
a cliff-dwelling species from Angola, is based. Bradleya 29:
61-66.
SOUSA, F„ FIGUEIREDO, E. & SMITH, G.F. 2010. Cyphostemma
mendesii (Vitaceae), a new species from Angola. Phytotaxa 7:
35-39.
G.F. SMITH*, E. FIGUEIREDO** and
L. CATARINO***
* Office of the Chief Director: Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity
Collections, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag
XI 01, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa / H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium,
Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002
South Africa / Centre for Functional Ecology, Departamento de Cien-
cias da Vida, Universidade de Coimbra, 3001-455 Coimbra, Portugal.
Email: g.smith@sanbi.org. za.
** Department of Botany, P.O.Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropo-
litan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031 South Africa / Centre for Func-
tional Ecology, Departamento de Ciencias da Vida, Universidade de
Coimbra, 3001-455 Coimbra, Portugal Email: estrelafigueiredo@hot-
mail.com.
*** Jardim Botanico Tropical, Instituto de Investigate Cientifica Tro-
pical, Trav. Conde da Ribeira 9, 1300-142 Lisboa, Portugal. Email:
lmfcatarino@gmail.com.
Bothalia 42,1 : 69-70 (2012)
OBITUARY
KATHLEEN DIXON GORDON-GRAY (NEE HUNTLEY) (1918-2012)
Kathleen Gordon-Gray passed away peacefully on 13
January 2012, eleven days before her 94th birthday. She
is survived by her only daughter Celia.
Gordon-Gray was no ordinary person; she was in fact
a most extraordinary and generous woman. Not only
was she the South African expert in Cyperaceae and
several other plant families occurring in KwaZulu-Natal
(KZN) (see scholar.google.co.za for a list of some of her
publications), but she was a wife, mother, and an excel-
lent lecturer in the then Botany Department at the Uni-
versity of Natal (now UKZN) on the Pietermaritzburg
campus. Gordon-Gray was also a much sought after
confidant and friend to students and colleagues alike.
It was her gentle and caring manner, ability to listen
and her almost infinite patience and desire for perfec-
tion that were her enduring qualities. I never heard her
speak ill of anyone and, if she had a fault, it was that
she accepted her lowly academic status in the Depart-
ment— as women often did in those days; foregoing
promotion to realize her professional calling. Even to
the last, wracked with arthritis, she was alert and work-
ing on Cyperaceae with Jane Browning and another of
her close co-workers C.J. (Roddy) Ward, a well-known
KZN plant collector and field ecologist (and ex-student
from her earliest days as a Junior Lecturer).
Kath Gordon-Gray was born in Pietermaritzburg and
graduated with a B.Sc. and M.Sc. (1939). Her Ph.D.
was awarded in 1959 (all degrees from Natal University,
now UKZN). After teaching at Girls Collegiate School
(1940-1945), she was appointed in the Botany Depart-
ment as a Junior Lecturer to teach mainly ex-service
men; later as Lecturer (1951-1966 (Gunn & Codd
1981)) under Professor A.W.J. Bayer who was Head of
Department at the time; as Senior Lecturer ( 1967-1976,
after Professor Bayer retired); and finally as Associate
Professor (1977-1978). She was, sadly, required by the
regulations of the time, to retire at the age of 60 in 1978
(Glen & Germishuizen, 2010); but continued to work on
her beloved KZN plants and the Cyperaceae in particu-
lar.
Gordon-Gray was essentially a ‘home’ girl, collecting
some 4 000 specimens mainly from KZN. My fondest
memories of her date back to the 1960s when the then
Botany Department in Pietermaritzburg was arguably
in its heyday. From the late 1950s to the early 1970s,
a remarkable number of botanists passed through the
Department (Moll 1987) and many undergraduates and
postgraduates came under the spell of Doc G-G, as she
was fondly known. Personally, if it had not been for
Gordon-Gray, I would have become a zoologist and I
know of many others who pursued a career in botany
because of her influence. Thus, almost single-handedly,
she recruited many people into botany who later became
FIGURE 1. — Three keen botanists sorting through live material of Aca-
cia robusta in the herbarium that had been collected for leaf and
pod measurements as part of a study to quantify the difference
between the two subspecies of ,4. robusta subspp. clavigera and
robusta. Left to right Eugene Moll, Kath Gordon-Gray, and Ken
Tinley (Photographer: J.H. Ross).
well known in their particular fields, and who then went
on themselves to recruit other botanists and ecologists.
Some noteworthy students and colleagues until the
1980s were Don Killick, Roddy Ward, Denzil Edwards,
Mike Wells, Clare Archer (Reid), Jim Ross, Fiona
Getliffe, Roger Ellis, Charles Stirton, Esme Hennessy,
Ken Tinley, Brian Downing, Brian Huntley, Ed Granger,
and Trevor Arnold.
One thing that she is well known for is her annota-
tions on herbarium sheets, that are often accompanied by
her meticulous drawings and notes of what she believed
to be diagnostic features (for example see Goetghebeur
& Coudijzer, 1985: 245), and on JSTOR some sheets
such as the Type of Fimbristylis bequaertii De Willd.
[Family Cyperaceae]; BR0000008639400, have illus-
trations by Gordon-Gray attached (J. Browning pers.
comm. January 2012).
When she died, Gordon-Gray was still working on
Cyperaceae with Jane Browning who compiled a com-
prehensive list of notes on her co-worker that she kindly
shared with me. ft was typical of Gordon-Gray to shun
the lime-light. She was however belatedly awarded the
South African Association of Botanists’ Silver Medal in
1998, though she certainly deserved greater recognition
earlier in her career. As she disliked being photographed,
pictures of her are rare and she shunned National and
International Meetings; preferring to work alone and in
close collaboration with those she knew and trusted. Yet.
through her teaching and supervision, she was inspira-
tional and provided sound theoretical and practical train-
ing in the fundamentals of taxonomy, anatomy, breed-
70
Bothalia 42,1 (2012)
ing systems and the ecology of her beloved sedges and
grasses.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to Celia Gordon-Gray, Jane Browning, and
Roddy Ward for reading and commenting on this obituary.
REFERENCES
GLEN, H.F. & GERMISHUIZEN, G. (compilers) 2010. Botanical
exploration of southern Africa, edition 2. Strelitzia 26. South
African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
GOETGHEBEUR, P. & COUDIJZER, J. 1985. studies in Cyperaceae
5 — the genus Bulbostylis in Central Africa. Bulletin du Jardin
Botanique National de Belgique 55: 207-259.
GUNN, M. & CODD, L.E. 1981. Botanical exploration of southern
Africa. A. A. Balkema, Cape Town.
MOLL, E.J. 1987. What future the ecological profession? Bulletin of the
South African Institute of Ecologists 6: 30, 31
E.J. Moll*
* Extraordinary Professor, Department of Biodiversity and Conserva-
tion Biology, University of the Western Cape, Bellville. E-mail: emoll@
telkomsa.net.
t
h
e
SANB Bookshop
situated at the National Herbarium Building
SANBI
Biodiversity for Life
Latest Publications
STRELITZIA 28
The aloe names book
O.M. Grace, R.R. Klopper, E. Figueiredo S. G. F. Smith [201 1)
The aloe names book contains an annotated list of names for the genus Aloe, and is intended
to provide a quick reference for checking names and key information about aloes. Accepted
names are used in part one, where some of the more common species are also illustrated,
as well as etymology, synonyms and all the known common names [given in various South
African languages). Part two deals with names for which the exact application is unknown,
part three with references, and part four lists the synonyms and common names. Published by
the South African National Biodiversity Institute [SANBI) and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Hard cover. A5. pp. viii + 231.
ISBN 978-1-91 9976-64-8
Price SADC R1 60. □□ / other countries US$40. 00
SANBI BIODIVERSITY SERIES NO 21
Water Dancers of South Africa’s
National Botanical Gardens. An illustrated dragonfly and damselfly checklist
Compiled by Christopher K. Willis S. Michael J. Samways [201 1)
After birds, butterflies and bees, dragonflies and damselflies are among the most conspicuous
groups of animals observed in South Africa's National Botanical Gardens. They are particularly
prevalent around rivers, streams, dams and other aquatic habitats. The title of this book —
water dancers — is a literal translation of the Zulu word 'jigamanzi' that has been used to
describe dragonflies; an apt description as adults swirl about water bodies engaged in their
daily business. Part of the reason for publishing this illustrated checklist is to create greater
public awareness and appreciation of the importance and value of conserving dragonfly diversity
as a valuable component of our natural habitats and ecosystems, as dragonflies serve as
excellent indicators of terrestrial and aquatic environmental change. Not only are dragonflies
good indicators of environmental health and ecological integrity, they also act as flagship
species for other aquatic invertebrates in the biodiversity debate. This book represents the
third in a series of Sappi-sponsored illustrated checklists of biodiversity recorded in South
Africa's National Botanical Gardens. Soft cover. A5. pp. 108.
ISBN 978-1-919976-68-6
Price SADC countries R80.00 / other countries US$20.00
SANBI BIODIVERSITY SERIES NO 20
Fundraising and marketing tools for biodiversity conservation and development
projects
Compiled by Cape Action for People and the Environment (201 1)
The majority of people working in the field of biodiversity conservation, whether paid or
voluntarily, generally have backgrounds in the natural sciences, or do so because of their
passion for sustaining and conserving all life forms. They rarely have experience in fundraising,
and with an estimated 110 000 non-profit organisations (NPOs) in South Africa, the
competition for donated money is tough, especially in times of global recession. This book
follows the real flow of marketing and fundraising processes: from the setting-up of a new
biodiversity conservation organisation, project identification and potential donor research, to
planning as broad an income-base as possible. This book provides a guide through the key steps
in fundraising and marketing. Where practical and applicable, experiences and advice from
established organisations active in biodiversity conservation are provided. Soft cover. A4. pp.
xii + 92.
ISBN 978-1-919976-67-9
Price SADC R1 20 / other countries US$30. 00
Visit our website: www.sanbi.org
Catalogue on website or available from the SANBI Bookshop
Tel: +27 12 843 5001
Fax: +27 12 804 3211
h-
Biodiversity for Life
Y
ORDER FROM:
SANBI Bookshop
Private Bag XI 01
Pretoria
0001 South Africa
ORDER FORM
April 2012
Tel.: +27 12 843 5000
Fax: +27 12 804 3211
E-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org
Website: www.sanbi.org
Personal Details:
Title: Initials: Surname:
Business/Organisation:
Account Number: Student Number:
Postal Address:
Postal Code:
Tel. no. (W): CHI: Fax: .
Email (if you'd like to be included on the mailing list):
BOTSOC card number
Country: .
Cell:
Subscription: I would like to subscribe to BOTHALIA* SADC customer □
□ 1 year "SADC R220. OO/other countries $55.00 Other □
□ 2 year [20 10/111 SADC R450. 00/other countries US$ 110.00
Payment:
A. Enclosed is my cheque/money order no for the amount of R
or US$ payable to the South African National Biodiversity Institute
B. Please charge my credit card:
Visa □ MasterCard □ American Express □
Expiry date:
Signature: Date:
All postage and clearance fees subject to currency fluctuations
SADC countries: Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland. Tanzania, Zambia,
Zimbabwe
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (2012)
SADC R220.00 Other countries US$55.00
TWO-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
2012/13: SADC R450.00 Other countries US$110.00
2013/14: SADC R450.00 Other countries US$110.00
BOTHALIA SPECIALS
Colour plates in Bothalia
Price per volume
Vol. 9, 3 & 4: 27 plates of Kniphofia spp. by Cythna Letty and others
Vol. 1 6, 1 : Kniphofia splendida by Cythna Letty
Vol. 27,2: Nivenia parviflora by Fay Anderson
Vol. 28,2: Cyrtanthus erubescens by M.E. Connell
Vol. 29,2: Gladiolus rhodanthus by Auriol Batten
Vol. 30,1 : Clivia miniata by Barbara Jeppe
Vol. 32,1 : Clivia mirabilis by Auriol Batten
Vol. 33,2: Cyrtanthus macmasteri by Auriol Batten
Vol. 33,2: Erica x willmorei by R. Mills
Vol. 33,2: Jamesbrittenia bergae by Gillian Condy
Vol. 37,1 : Cyrtanthus aureolinus by Vicki Thomas
Vol. 41,1: Ferraria spp., photographs
Vol. 41,2: Ornithoglossum pulchrum photographs
Vol. 41,2: Maireana brevifolia photographs
Vol. 42,1: Sphenostylis marginata, S. angustifolia photographs
SADC: R30.00 /
SADC: R10. 00 /
SADC: R85.00 /
SADC: R85.00 /
SADC: R85.00 /
SADC: R85.00 /
SADC: R95.00 /
SADC: R95.00 /
SADC: R95.00 /
SADC: R95.00 /
SADC: R1 20.00
SADC: R120.00
SADC: R120.00
SADC: R 120.00
SADC: R120.00
Other: US$8.00
Other: US$3.00
Other: US$22.00
Other: US$22.00
Other: US$22.00
Other: US$22.00
Other: US$24.00
Other: US$24.00
Other: US$24.00
Other: US$24.00
/ Other: US$30.00
/ Other: US$30.00
/ Other: US$30.00
/ Other: US$30.00
/ Other: US$30.00
The history of the
Botanical Research Institute
by Denise Fourie
a reprint of this article in Bothalia 28,2 with an attractive cover.
Price: SADC countries, R30.00 / Other countries US$8.00
All prices include VAT. Prices are subject to change from time to time. Postage is excluded. Please consult the latest catalogue.
Available from: The Bookshop, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, RSA
Tel. (012) 843-5001 • Fax (012) 804-321 1 • email: bookshop@sanbi.org. za
BOTHALIA
Volume 42,1 May 2012
CONTENTS
1. Revision of the genus Sphenostylis (Fabaceae: Phaseoleae) in South Africa and Swaziland. A.N.
MOTEETEE and B.-E. VAN WYK 1
2. Anatomy of myxospermic diaspores of selected species in the Succulent Karoo, Namaqualand,
South Africa. H. FOTOUO MAKOUATE, M.W. VAN ROOYEN and C.F. VAN DER
MERWE 7
3. Recircumscription and distribution of elements of the ‘ Ceterach cordatum' complex ( Asplenium :
Aspleniaceae) in southern Africa. R.R. KLOPPER and N.R. CROUCH 15
4. A revision of Tecophilaeaceae subfam. Tecophilaeoideae in Africa. J.C. MANNING and P.
GOLDBLATT 21
5. Notes on African plants:
Aizoaceae. Corpuscularia gracillima is the correct binomial for the illegitimate C. gracilis. J.
NIEDERLE 49
Asteraceae. Berkheya jardineana (Arctotideae — Gorteriinae), a new dwarf perennial from the
Swartruggens, Western Cape. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 57
Asteraceae. Osteospermum norlindhianum and O. nordenstamii, two new species of
Osteospermum sect. Trefenestratae (Calenduleae) from the Greater Cape Floristic
Region. J.C. MANNING, P. GOLDBLATT and N.A. HELME 59
Fabaceae. A new species of Banhinia from southern Mozambique and the reinstatement of
Bauhinia macrantha. E.J.D. SCHMIDT 44
Hyacinthaceae. Drimia echinostachya , correcting a nomenclatural oversight. U. EGGLI and
N.R. CROUCH 43
Hyacinthaceae. New combinations in Ledebouria. J.C. MANNING and P. GOLDBLATT 47
Iridaceae. Taxonomic notes on Moraea (Irideae) in Congo and adjacent countries. P.
GOLDBLATT and J.C. MANNING 49
Monimiaceae. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the monotypic genus Xymalos and
general information on the family Monimiaceae. M. JORDAAN and M. LOTTER 5 1
6. Obituary. Eduardo Jose dos Santos Moreira Mendes (1924-201 1). G.F. SMITH, E. FIGUEIREDO
and L. CATARINO 67
7. Obituary. Kathleen Dixon Gordon-Gray (nee Huntley) (1918-2012). E.J. MOLL 69
Abstracted, indexed or listed in • AETFAT Index • AGRICOLA • AGRIS • BIOSIS: Biological Abstracts /RRM • CABS • CABACCESS • CAB
ABSTRACTS • ISI: Current Contents, Scisearch, Research Alert • Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature • Taxon: reviews and notices.
ISSN 006 8241
‘ Published by and obtainable from: South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X 1 0 1 , Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Tel. (012) 843-5000. Fax (012) 804-321 1. e-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org website: www.sanbi.org. Typesetting and page layout: D. Maree.
Printing: Seriti Printing (Pty) Ltd, P.O. Box 24829, Cezina, 0031 Pretoria.