Library
Arnold Arboretum
of
Harvard University
I
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2015
https://archive.org/details/journalofwashing5119wash
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
Vol. 51 • No. 1
JANUARY 1961
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, U. S. Dept, of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, Geo. Washington Univer
Sciences sity
John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Contributors
Albert M. S*tone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, Geo. Washington University
Lloyd N. Ferguson, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC.
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes: (1)
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles, (2) notices of meetings
and proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies, and (3) regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate; $7.50 per yr. (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Circulation Manager of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, c/o Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
Philip Hauge Abelson
President, Washington Academy of Sciences, 196J
When Phil Abelson was elected in 1959 to the
National Academy of Sciences, one of the highest
honors that can come to an American scientist,
he could have affiliated himself with any one of
seven sections of the Academy, because he has
made distinguished contributions to Biochemis-
try, Chemistry, Engineering, Geology, Geo-
physics, Microbiology, and Physics. Perhaps the
presence of his friend Bill Rubey (Past President
of the Washington Academy) in the Section on
Geology caused Phil to register as a geologist.
In Who’s Who in America he calls himself a
physical chemist, but the only proper designation
for Phil Abelson is “scientist,” for he has set
no limit to his inquiries in natural science.
Phil is not unusual in his curiosity about
natural phenomena; many of us are interested
in all sciences from anthropology to zoology.
Indeed, a function of the Washington Academy
is to encourage broad interest in science and
interdisciplinary connections and relationships
among the recognized branches of science. Phil
is unique, however, in his successful pursuit
of knowledge through personal research in widely
different fields. I used to think of the late Forest
Ray Moulton as the modern Benjamin Franklin,
but now I think that honor should go to Phil.
Let us examine his remarkable career.
Phil was born in Tacoma, Washington, in 1913,
a son of a civil engineer. In his early teens he
learned to help his father in surveying and was
soon able to do the work of a skilled surveyor.
Opportunity and responsibility came when he
was permitted to substitute for a surveyor who
was absent from an important job because of ill-
ness. The boy made good and at 17 became
Tacoma’s City Surveyor. Thus he earned money
to pay some of his expenses at Washington State
University (then the State College of Washing-
ton). He majored in the physical sciences and
graduated in three years when he was only 20.
He remained in Pullman for two more years for a
master’s degree and served as an assistant in
physics. During this period he became acquainted
with the work of the late Ernest 0. Lawrence
at the University of California in Berkeley and
decided to work for his Ph.D. in nuclear physics
with Lawrence. His famous Radiation Laboratory
was new at that time and so was the cyclotron.
Phil was in on the ground floor of the great
developments in nuclear physics. His doctor’s dis-
sertation (1939) described the first identification
of many important products of uranium fission.
While at Berkeley Phil met and married a
young medical student, who must have caused
him to think about the biological effects of
ionizing radiations. In 1939 he joined the staff of
the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Terres-
trial Magnetism here in Washington, a research
institution that is not at all restricted to the study
of terrestrial magnetism. He collaborated with
Edwin M. McMillan, of the Radiation Laboratory,
in the discovery of neptunium and in the determi-
nation of its chemical properties. These in-
vestigations suggested the early process used at
Hanford for the manufacture of plutonium.
During World War II he was, of course, a key
figure in the Manhattan Project. Attached to the
Naval Research Laboratory, he developed the
liquid thermal diffusion method for the enrich-
ment of uranium 235. Under his general super-
vision a plant employing that method was de-
signed and constructed at Oak Ridge and in-
corporated into the over-all facility used in the
production of the first atomic bomb. For this
work he was awarded the Navy’s Distinguished
Civilian Service Medal. About two years ago
there appeared in a local newspaper a feature
story about Phil as the real father of our first
nuclear-powered submarine, in the sense that he
was the first to show how to use atomic energy
for propulsion of undersea vessels. He won’t talk
about it, but he assured me that the story I read
was substantially correct. Admiral Rickover,
whose name is always associated with our atomic
submarines, was the leader of the developmental
phase of the work.
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
1
At the end of World War 11 we find Phil one of
the atomic scientists who had helped to win the
war for America. He had been well compensated
and honored for his work. What would you ex-
pect him to do next? I would have expected
him to advance to a position of greater authority
in nuclear physics, and perhaps to promote the
peaceful applications of atomic energy, which
he must have foreseen. I would have expected
him also to join in the public alarm sounded
by the Atomic Scientists about the need for
proper control of atomic energy. He did neither;
instead he searched his own mind and conscience
and quietly decided that he wanted to resume
learning — to do basic research himself. Strange to
say, he turned to biology where he could apply
chemical and physical tools to the education of
fundamental questions about living matter. The
opportunity to do such work was provided by
Merle A. Tuve, a member of the Washington
Academy and of the National Academy, who had
become Director of the Department of Terres-
trial Magnetism of the Carnegie Institution.
Thus Phil returned to the laboratory from which
the war had taken him, rejecting greater salaries
that he might have obtained elsewhere. He be-
came Chairman of the Biophysics Section of the
Department, which was a pioneer in the utiliza-
tion of radioactive tracers in biological research.
The group worked out many of the processes of
synthesis of the principal amino acids and pub-
lished a widely-used monograph on the subject.
In 1950 while in this position Phil received the
Annual Award of the Washington Academy of
Sciences, in the Physical Sciences; in 1962 he
will present this same award and others to young
men and women whose research or teaching has
been outstanding.
In 1953 Phil carried his biological interests
into another laboratory of the Carnegie Insti-
tution. Appointed Director of the Geophysical
Laboratory, he initiated investigations in what
might be called biochemical evolution. Previ-
ously, comparative studies of plant and animal
fossils had been only morphological. Phil saw
the possibility of making chemical studies on
traces of organic matter that he found, for ex-
ample, in fossil shells. By paper chromatography
he was able to isolate amino acids from fossils
as old as 450 million years!
It would be natural for Director Abelson to
succumb scientifically to the growing demands
upon him as an administrator, a lecturer, a chair-
man or member of committees and editor. But
he resists encroachment upon his time for think-
ing about his own research and for working at
it with his own hands. Most recently he has
been engaged with Thomas C. Hoering of his
Laboratory in studying separation of carbon
isotopes occurring during photosynthesis. By
examining C13/C12 in amino acids from organisms
grown in the laboratory they have discovered
unexpected isotope fractionations. How can he
do such research and also do more than his
share as a citizen of the Washington scientific
community? It takes a special environment, spe-
cial ability and dedication, and an unusual design
for living to be an Abelson. He literally lives with
his work at his Laboratory and goes to his
home in Philadelphia to spend week ends and
holidays with his wife (a practising physician)
and daughter. During the working week he is able
to allocate his time so as to concentrate exclu-
sively on his research for periods long enough for
effective thought and action.
Phil’s non-research activities for science are
impressive. His work as co-editor of the Journal
of Geophysical Research must be very time con-
suming. I know that he has had much to do with
the recent rapid growth of this highly technical
journal, which is certainly the world’s leading
publication in its field. His interest in the
medical sciences is not surprising if one knows
that Mrs. Abelson is a physician. For eight years
he served as chairman of an NAS-NRC com-
mittee on cataracts of the eye caused by ionizing
radiations. On another committee he concerned
himself with substances that might be used to
expand the volume of usable blood plasma. From
1956 to 1959 he was a member of the Biophysical
Study Section of the National Institutes of Health
and now serves on the Board of Scientific Coun-
selors of the National Institute of Arthritis and
Metabolic Diseases. On the physical side, he is
a member of the General Advisory Committee of
the Atomic Energy Commission and a member
of its Plowshare Advisory Committee, i.e., on
peaceful applications of atomic explosions, such
as were described to the Washington Academy
by Dr. Edward Teller at a meeting of the Acad-
emy in 1959. He is a consultant to the National
Aeronautics and Space Agency. His member-
ship in a dozen or so major scientific societies also
reflects the extraordinary diversity of his interest.
His preparation for service as President of the
Washington Academy includes not only the above
experiences in the content and civics of science,
but experiences in the affairs of the Academy itself.
In 1957 he served as chairman of the Meetings
Committee under Bill Rubey. As an elected
member of the Board of Managers he was a
faithful attendant at the monthly Board meetings
and a participant in its deliberations. It was he
who set in motion the chain of events that led
to a radical change in character of the Journal
of the Academy, a revolution that is now becom-
ing an evolution.
Phil is a quiet, thoughtful person, with whom
one cannot become quickly acquainted. Certainly
I do not know my subject as well as I should
like to and probably not well enough for writing
a profile that does him justice. I hope, however.
2
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
that my readers believe, as I do, that the Wash-
ington Academy is very fortunate to have ac-
quired a share of his time. When he was elected
a member of the Cosmos Club in 1953, his
principal sponsors were two prominent physical
scientists, Vannever Bush and L. R. Hafstad.
The latter described Phil as a “most able scientist.
possessing an exceptional originality, with many
outstanding scientific accomplishments to his
credit.” Withal Phil is a modest, charming fel-
low with a flashing smile. I expect his “excep-
tional originality” to be applied to the Academy
gently but effectively. Frank L. Campbell
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column will present brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards .
election to membership or office in scientific
and technical societies, appointment to technical
committees, civic activities, and marriages, births,
and other family news. Formal contributors are
being assigned for the systematic collection of
news at institutions employing considerable num-
bers of Academy members (see list on masthead) .
However, for the bulk of the membership, we
must rely on individuals to send us news concern-
ing themselves, and their friends. Contributions
may be addressed to Harold T. Cook , Associate
Editor , U. S. Department of Agriculture .
Agricultural Marketing Service , Room 3917
South Building , Washington 25, D, C.
CARNEGIE INSTITUTION
H. W. Wells, Department of Terrestrial Mag-
netism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, is
on leave of absence to serve at the U. S. Embassy,
Rio de Janeiro, as Scientific Attache.
DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN
Harry Polachek, Technical Director of the
Applied Mathematics Laboratory at the David
Taylor Model Basin, received the Distinguished
Civilian Service Award on November 23. This
honorary award, the highest that the Secretary of
the Navy may confer on a civilian employee of
the Navy, was given in recognition of Dr. Pola-
chek’s achievements in organizing and directing
the Applied Mathematics Laboratory, in demon-
strating the potential of high speed computers
and in his contributions to scientific, technical
and management fields such as nuclear design,
advance programming systems, and analysis ol
acoustic signals. This has opened additional lines
of research such as the automatic computation
of ship lines and speeded the solution of a
variety of problems and data reduction.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Edwin. W. Roedder gave a paper on “Primary
fluid inclusions in sphalerite crystals from the
OH vein, Creede, Colorado,” and Margaret D.
Foster gave a paper on “Fe203 in chlorites” at
the meeting of the Geological Society of America
and affiliated societies, Denver, Colorado, October
31 to November 2. Arthur A. Baker, Helen
M. Duncan, Joseph J. Fahey, George T.
Faust, Jewell J. Glass and Marjorie Hooker
also attended the meetings. At these meetings
Miss Marjorie Hooker was re-elected Treasurer
of the Mineralogical Society of America and Dr.
George T. Faust was re-elected Treasurer of the
Geochemical Society.
Francis R. Fosberg has returned from a two
months’ trip to the Pacific, during which he par-
ticipated in a symposium on “The Impact of
early man on humid tropical vegetation,” held
under the auspices of Unesco at Goroka, in the
interior of New Guinea. While in New Guinea,
Dr. Frosberg made a study of the vegetation
patterns and visited an island of the Great
Barrier Reef on the Queensland coast. In com-
pany with C. G. Johnson, of the Military Geology
Branch, D. I. Blumenstock, of the Weather Bu-
reau, and Harald Rehder, of the National Mu-
seum, he also visited Jaluit Atoll, in the Marshall
Islands, to study the course of recovery of the
atoll from the effects of the 1958 typhoon
Ophelia.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Lloyd N. Ferguson recently made talks on
“The Direction of Enolization of 1,3-Diketones”
at the University of Vermont; “Group Electroneg-
ativities in Organic Chemistry” at Norwich Uni-
versity; “Physicochemical Studies on the Sense
of Taste” at St. Michael’s College, “Multiple
Careers for College Science Majors” and “Aro-
matic Character of Certain Ring Structures” at
Middlebury College, under the ACS Visiting
Scientists Program.
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
3
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Frank L. Campbell served as deputy fore-
man of the November District of Columbia Grand
Jury from November 7. 1960 to January 10, 1961.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
Arnold M. Bass is in London on a research
assignment under the NBS training program. He
is working with Dr. W. R. S. Garton in the
Physics Department, Imperial College of Science
and Technology, University of London until July
1961. Dr. Bass is working on vacuum ultraviolet
spectra of diatomic molecules.
Academy members presenting papers at recent
meetings included the following: Alexander,
S. N., “What’s Ahead in ADP Equipment”,
American University, Institute on Electronics in
Management, Washington, D. C., October 31;
Bennett, J. A., “What the Metallurgist is Doing
About Fatigue,” Washington Chapter, American
Society for Metals, Washington, D. C., November
14; Cook, R. K., and Young, J. M., “Strange
Sounds at Low Frequencies in the Atmosphere”,
Physics S’eminar, University of Maryland, College
Park. Maryland, November 8; Cook, R. K.,
“Methods for Measuring Sound Transmission
Loss”, American Society for Testing Materials
Symposium on Testing, Washington, D. C., No-
vember 15; Frederikse, H. P. R., “Conduction
in Rutile,” Solid State Physics Group, Westing-
house Research Laboratories, Pittsburgh, Penn-
sylvania, November 7 ; Harris, F. K., “The
present Status of the Electrical Standards,”
American Institute of Electrical Engineers. New
Haven, Connecticut, November 15; Herzfeld,
C. M., “Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy,” In-
stitute for Religions and Social Studies, New
York, N.Y., November 22; McNish, A. G., “Inter-
national Coordination of Standards,” 1960 Middle
Atlantic Conference for American Society for
Quality Control, the Martin Company, Baltimore.
Md., November 11; McPherson, A. T., “Preci-
sion Measurement and National Security,”
Cumberland Section, American Society for
Quality Control, Cumberland, Md., November 1 ;
Paffenbarger, G. C., “Denture Base Resins:
Changes in Dimensions During Processing and
in Service,” Mid-Continental Dental Congress, St.
Louis, Mo., October 30; Posner, A. S., “Three
Dimensional Chemistry,” American Chemical So-
ciety Student Affiliate, University of Maryland,
College Park, Md., November 16; Rubin, R. J.,
“Classical Energy Transport in Disordered Lat-
tices,” American Physical Society, Chicago, 111.,
November 25-26; Scribner, B. F., “Spectroscopic
Trace Analysis,” Eastern Analytical Symposium.
New York, N. Y., November 3; Sweeney, W. T.,
“Properties of Resins Used in Dentistry,” U. S.
Army Central Dental Laboratory Commanders
Conference, Washington, D. C., November 14-16;
Taylor, L. S., “Attending the meetings of the
International Atomic Energy Agency on Basic
Safety Standards of Radiation,” Vienna, Austria,
October 31-November 4; Taylor, J. K., “Electro-
analytical Chemistry”, Chemistry Seminar, Kent
State University, Kent, Ohio, November 2, and
“High Precision Coulometric Titrations”. Analyti-
cal Group, Cleveland Section, American Chemical
Society, “Advancing the Profession of Chemistry”
American Chemical Society, Dayton, Ohio, Novem-
ber 8, and “A Code of Ethics for Chemists,”
American Chemical Society, Philadelphia, Penn-
sylvania, November 17; Youden, W. J., “What
Happens When Different Laboratories Evaluate
the Same Item?”, Binghamton Section of the
American Society for Quality Control, Bingham-
ton, New York, November 14.
NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
George R. Irwin and J. A. Kies presented a
paper entitled “Review of Fracture Toughness
Measurements” at the Twentieth Meeting of the
ANC-5 Panel on MIL-HDBK-5 Strength of Metal
Aircraft Elements, in Los Angeles, California on
November 15-17.
Dr. Irwin also gave a series of lectures on
“Materials and Missiles for Spacecraft” at the
University of California in Los Angeles, Decem-
ber 1-6.
Hoi •aee M. Trent and Betty E. Anderson com-
piled a “Glossary of Terms Commonly Used in
Acoustics.” This pamphlet was prepared for the
American Institute of Physics and is available
from them on request.
Dr. Trent was one of seven panelists at a con-
ference October 19 in San Francisco for science
writers. This conference was sponsored by the
American Institute of Physics with financial back-
ing from the National Science Foundation. He
spoke on “Mechanical Shock and Vibration.”
He also gave lectures to high school science
and mathematics teachers from the local area
at the Naval Research Laboratory November 19
and 21.
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH
J. Samuel Smart left the Physics Branch
August 19 to take a position with the IBM Re-
search Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights,
N. Y.
USDA, BELTSVILLE
R. I. Sailer, until recently Assistant Chief of
Insect Identification and Parasite Introduction
Research Branch, of the Entomology Research
Division, left on November 25 to take charge
of the European Counterpest Laboratory, Paris,
France. The Laboratory is headquarters for the
Entomology Research Division Foreign Parasite
Investigations. Discovery and introduction into
the United States of parasiies or predators that
attack crop pests is the primary objective of the
Laboratory.
4
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
Paul W. Oman, Chief, Insect Identification
and Parasite Introduction Research Branch, En-
tomology Research Division, is serving as director
of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Far
Eastern Regional Research Office in New Delhi,
India, to develop and coordinate the agricultural
research grant program in Asiatic countries con-
ducted with PL 480 funds.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Hazel K. Stiebeling presented a paper on
“Contributions of Insecticides to the American
Home (including nutrition and Household Pests)’'
at a symposium on Contributions of Insecticides
to Human Welfare, at the Entomological Society
of America meeting in Atlantic City, November 28.
Justus C. Ward served on a panel on the
Pesticide Residue Problem at the Eastern Branch
of the Entomological Society of America meeting
at New York City, October 14. On November 18,
he spoke before the general session of the Oregon
State Horticultural Society, Corvallis, Oregon, on
“Historical Notes on Pesticide Controls,” and
before the Apple and Pear Section on “Pesticide
Residues and Regulations.”
Elbert L. Little, Jr., U. S. Forest Service,
attended the First Mexican Botanical Congress,
in Mexico City, October 24-26.
UNCLASSIFIED
Lloyd V. Berkner has resigned as president
of Associated Universities, Inc., New York, to
accept the presidency of the Graduate Research
Center, Dallas, Texas. Dr. Berkner has headed
the Associated Universities, Inc., for the last 10
years.
DEATHS
George Willis Stose died January 30, 1960,
after a long illness. He received the B.S. degree
in civil engineering from Massachusetts Institute
of Technology in 1893 and then spent 1 year in
graduate work in geology. He joined the U.S\
Geological Survey in 1894 and attained the rank
of Chief Scientist (Geologist). Dr. Stose was
retired in 1941 at the age of 72 years, his em-
ployment having been extended 2 years by Presi-
dential order. He was called back to make war-
time studies of manganese deposits in Alabama
and Virginia from July 1949 to February 1953.
For 44 years he was Editor of Geologic Maps,
in charge of the Section of Geologic Maps. The
geologic map of the United States printed in
1932 was compiled under his direction. Dr.
Stose’s own field studies were devoted largely to
the geology of the Appalachians. His bibliography
contains over 100 publications.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
Considerable progress is reported in organizing
five technical groups or division within the Sec-
tion, in the areas of: instrumentation and tele-
metry; communications; transportation, indus-
try and management; power; and science and
electronics. At least one of these divisions has
held two meetings already, and others are
planned.
American Society of Civil Engineers,
National Capital Section
Annual Fall Awards to Outstanding Students
were made, on December 13, to Howard T. Hill,
George Washington Univ., Christopher L. Martin,
Howard University, and Michael A. Czachor,
Catholic University.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
Mechanical engineering education for the re-
mainder of the Twentieth Century was appraised
by Paul F. Chenea, of Purdue University, at the
December 8 meeting. This analysis tried, as so
many are doing, to examine whether changes in
curricula are needed, the relation of schools to
industry, and the interplay of teaching duties
and research effort.
Chemical Society of Washington
Principal business at the November 29 meeting
of the board of managers concerned how best
to arouse and continue member interest, a prob-
lem earlier studied by an ad hoc committee of
the board. It was generally considered unwise
to hold business sessions at regular meetings
featuring outside speakers, but that much might
be accomplished by inviting members to attend
Board meetings, by opening committee meetings
to the membership at large, by establishing addi-
tional committees with the avowed objective of
furthering entertainment, organizing special
events, and extending welcome to new and trans-
fer members. A possible way to accommodate
members’ interests in specialized areas of chem-
istry would be to form topical groups or sub-
sections within the society.
Geological Society of Washington
In addition to the regular program at the
November 9 meeting, Frank C. Whitmore, Jr.
discussed the discovery of an upper Miocene
whale near Hampton, Va., perhaps the finest
fossil of its kind that has thus far been found
on the Atlantic Coastal Plain. It is also of special
interest because, previously, whales of this type
were thought to be of Pliocene age.
Philosophical Society of Washington
The Ninth Annual Christmas Lectures this year
presented George W. Beadle, of the California
Institute of Technology, on the general topic
“Genes as Living Molecules.” These lectures are
primarily for high school and advanced junior
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
5
high school students, who are admitted free upon
presentation of tickets distributed by the Society.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Beginning with this issue, meetings of affiliated
societies scheduled for the month of publication
of the Journal will be noted chronologically.
When available to us at the time of writing, the
nature of the program, the place, and the time
will be noted. Entries which do not include all
of this information indicate, in most instances,
a regularly scheduled meeting of the society —
unless our correspondents notify us to the con-
trary, we assume that the date and location of
such meetings remain unchanged from month
to month. Every attempt will be made during
1961 to have the Journal appear at the beginning
of each month. (January excepted).
January 16 — Acoustical Society of America,
Washington, D.C. Chapter
Gallaudet College, 8:00 PM
Society of American Military Engineers,
Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K, N.W., 12:15 PM
January 18 — Insecticide Society of Wash-
ington
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 PM
Washington Society of Engineers
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 22nd and Mass.
Ave., N.W., 8:00 PM
January 19 — Washington Academy of
Sciences
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 22nd and Mass.
Ave., N.W.
Banquet and presentation of Academy Awards.
Society of American Foresters, Washing-
ton Section
YWCA, 17th and K, N.W., 6:30 PM
January 24 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
YWCA, 17th and K, N.W., 12:00 noon
Society o f American Bacteriologists,
Washington Branch
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
January 26 — American Society of Mechan-
ical Engineers, Washington Section
John Coutinho, “Reliability,” Pepco Auditorium,
10th and E, N.W., 8:00 PM
ACADEMY ACTIVITIES
The 454th meeting of the Academy will be the
Annual Dinner Meeting, held January 19, 1960
at the John Wesley Powell Auditorium. Awards
for Scientific Achievement will be presented by the
President to the following recipients:
1. Biological Sciences. Louis S. Baron, Walter
Reed Army Institute of Research.
2. Engineering Sciences. Romald E. Bowles,
Diamond Ordnance Fuse Laboratory.
3. Physical Sciences. Richard A. Ferrell, Uni-
versity of Maryland.
4. Mathematics. Philip J. Davis, National Bu-
reau of Standards.
5. T eaching — High School Science. Mrs. Pauline
Diamond, Sherwood High School.
6. Teaching — College and University Science.
Karl F. Herzfeld, Catholic University.
A full-length feature on the Awards program
and the recipients will appear in the February
issue of the Journal.
CORRECTION
Figures from the Treasurer’s reports of Acad-
emy receipts and disbursements as printed on
page 16 of the November 1960 issue of the
Journal show larger totals for the year to June
than to September.
This is because the author inadvertently in-
cluded the totals for the Junior Academy of
Sciences in the earlier report. Correct totals for
January-June are: receipts, $9,605; disburse*
ments, $8,850.
THE BROWNSTONE TOWER
Frank L. Capbell
Looking south down
the Potomac from the
Brownstone T o w e r,
one might with the
help of a telescope
locate the Engineer
Research and Devel-
opment Laboratories
of the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers at
Ft. Belvoir, Va. Just
prior to writing this
column, I drove down
to the ERDL to see
Clyde S. Barnhart, who is the entomologist in
the Sanitary Sciences Branch (Richard P.
Schmitt, in charge) of these Laboratories. He is
responsible to W. Doyle Reed, an active member
of the Washington Academy, for the develop-
ment of equipment for pest control (rodents,
insects, etc.) in the armed services, for the Corps
of Engineers does this work for the Navy and
Air Force as well as for the Army.
Dr. Barnhart was one of my students at the
Ohio State University prior to World War II.
He showed unusual imagination and proficiency
in devising and constructing equipment for the
rearing of insects and for experimentation with
6
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
them. Both the second world war and the Korean
war so interfered with his career that he did not
take his doctor’s degree in entomology until 1958.
Admittedly a Ph.D. was not necessary for engi-
neering research, but he was determined to show
that he could take his degree in insect morphol-
ogy, and at last the time came when he was ready
for placement in a position where his engineer-
ing talents could be given full sway.
What I now have to say about the work of Dr.
Barnhart, whom I shall call Barney hereafter,
will serve a dual purpose: (1) to inform the
members of the Academy about some interesting
work that might not otherwise come to their
attention, and (2) to provide for the Member-
ship Committee information about Barney that I
hope will cause him to be elected to the Academy.
Soon after he came to ERDL, Barney con-
cluded that the current pest control equipment
was heavier and more expensive than was neces-
sary. In view of the probability that future mili-
tary operations will be air borne, it is really
important that everything used by the military
should be as light in weight as possible. There-
fore he began to think about how to lighten and
simplify the existing equipment.
First, he worked on a mosquito light trap, a
device for attracting mosquitoes to an electric
light and drawing them into a trap below by
means of a downward current of air. The exist-
ing trap was large, heavy, and had to be hooked
up to an electric outlet in order to operate it.
Barney designed and built a smaller cylindrical
trap of plastic materials and used dry batteries
to operate the light and a motor that spins a toy
propeller. The final product was not impressive
in appearance, but extensive field tests have
shown that it is promising, improvable, and usable
everywhere.
Then Barney turned his attention to the rodent
bait station, a heavy metal housing for poison
bait attractive to rats. After these metal con-
tainers are used they have to be cleaned before
they can be used again. Barney went to work
with scissors and cardboard and cut out a pattern
that could be folded into the shape of a very
small dog house. The rat either enters the box
to feed on the bait or it feeds with its head in
the entrance. When such a simple inexpensive
device becomes contaminated and is no longer
attractive, it is simply destroyed by burning.
Again, field tests have demonstrated that this
carboard shelter is just as effective as the old
sheet metal containers.
I shall not mention everything that Barney
has done along this line, but I do want to de-
scribe his centrifugal sprayer, which uses a
principle not hitherto employed in commercial
sprayers. The spray liquid is drawn or pumped
through the hollow shaft of a motor and is
thrown out through plastic tubing attached at
right angles to the end of the rotating shaft.
This sprayer is in process of development and
will be designed so that the whole unit on a
pedestal can be clamped to the rear end of an
army vehicle and will deliver a mist of con-
centrated spray that will be carried away from
the vehicle as it moves forward. Weight is re-
duced to a minimum and the operation is rela-
tively quiet.
Although this device is easily transportable
and can be attached to any military vehicle for
use wherever the vehicle can move, Barney
sensed the need for something even simpler
that can be carried by the individual soldier and
used by him not only to produce a space spray
for control of flying insects, such as mosquitoes,
but also for the control of insects for which a
so-called residual spray is required. In response
to this need Barney created what I like to call
the Whippersnapper, of the most elegant simplic-
ity. The soldier carries in his hand or suspended
from his shoulder a plastic bottle or bag con-
taining a liquid insecticide. A long flexible
plastic tube from container ends in a tiny brass
nozzle. To deliver spray that will drift down
wind all the soldier has to do is whip the
plastic tube around by hand, as a cowboy whirls
a rope, but in a vertical plane. It is helpful to
have an enlargement as a handle about a third
of the way along the tube. It occurred to Barney
that this enlargement might serve another pur-
pose. If one wants to spray, it gives simply a
convenient hand hold on the tube. But if one
wishes to deposit on a surface a layer of insecti-
cide by means of a coarse spray, the plastic
holder then becomes a pump which when
squeezed repeatedly forces a coarse spray out of
the nozzle. This pump has one-way valves at
either end and is used in hospitals for pump-
ing blood. The Whippersnapper, Barney tells
me, has attracted most favorable attention from
military officers.
Barney could have concentrated on pest con-
trol equipment to the exclusion of everything else
going on around him, but he could not help
being aware of the need for extension of his
“light weight line” into the field of desalination
and water purification, and he was encouraged
to spend part of his time along these lines. The
result is that he has moved into a very important
and active field of research headed in Govern-
ment by the Office of Saline Waters of the U. S.
Department of the Interior.
He started his work on the assumption that
if the evaporating surface was brought very close
to the condensing surface the efficiency of dis-
tillation would be improved. He has not been
concerned at all with stills as we know them in
a chemical laboratory but rather with the obtain-
ing of a condensate on a surface at a lower
temperature than that of the evaporating surface,
which he separates from the condensing surface
by means of a water-repelling plastic window
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
7
screen. A rotating device on this principle was
built and worked very well, but again Barney
thought that it was more important from the
military point of view to work first on a device
for the use of individual soldiers, sailors, or air
men than to develop a machine for the produc-
tion of fresh water in large quantities from salt
water. Therefore I shall describe here only a
very simple arrangement for the production of
small quantities of fresh water from seawater.
Let us suppose that men are adrift at sea under
a rainless sky without drinking water. Each
man could spend his time getting drinking water
from Barney’s solar still, which looks superficially
like a file of correspondence having a minimum
of five sheets. The top sheet consists of black
plastic film; the second, a piece of paper towel-
ing or cloth; the third, a water-repellent screen,
or netting; the fourth, a piece of aluminum
foil; and the fifth a cloth backing for the foil
to cool it by evaporation of water from the cloth.
The castaway dips all these sheets in the ocean,
thus saturating the paper toweling and cloth with
sea water. Then he drains off excess water, wipes
off the aluminum foil with his shirt, and exposes
the top black surface to the sun. In a little
while he opens these layers, exposing the alumi-
num surface upon which there will be a conden-
sate of fresh water. This he can mop up with a
sponge to be provided in the kit and obtain
water from the sponge.
Barney finds that the efficiency of this device
can be multiplied by replication of layers two,
three, and four mentioned above, and I myself
saw the operation of a multilayered pile in which
the three intermediate layers were repeated six
times. On each of the aluminum layers a conden-
sate was formed, diminishing in quantity as one
proceeds from the top aluminum surface to the
layers below. This survival still can be operated
when the sun is not shining or at night merely
by sitting on the black surface, thus providing a
temperature differential between the top surface
warmed by the body and the aluminum surfaces
cooled by the sea water. Thus, as Barney ex-
presses it, the output of the still will be propor-
tional to the human effort put into it, and cer-
tainly a man who wants nothing so much as
water will be glad to put a lot of effort into it.
There is in the embryo stage another solar still
that will require little attention. It will be a
variation of the so-called greenhouse still. A bell
jar without a knob on top will be covered by an
aluminum layer and the aluminum in turn by a
black cloth or wick, which will pick up saline
water from a circular trough below. This wet
surface will be covered by a larger transparent bell
jar the inside surface of which will be close to but
not in contact with the wick. The double bell will
be placed in direct sunlight, which will shine
through the outer jar and will heat the cloth
and aluminum under it. The heat will be con-
ducted by the aluminum around to the shady
side of the bell. Then there will be a consider-
able temperature difference between the warm
wet surface and the cooler glass jar surrounding
it. Most of the condensate will form on the in
side of the glass jar away from the sun. Be-
cause of its shape, this device need not be
oriented toward the sun, but will work unat-
tended wherever it is exposed to sunshine. Suit-
able arrangements will be made, of course, to
collect the condensate.
All the above-mentioned developments have been
protected by patent applications.
It was very interesting to me to see how Barney
has reduced to practice the ideas that have come
to him in such profusion. He has help, of course,
but at first in the heat of imagination he works
with his own hands and uses whatever he can
and that he might adapt to his purpose. Thus
his prototypes look very crude indeed, but in the
end the armed services and the civilian popula-
tion will benefit greatly by his work.
SCIENCE AND
DEVELOPMENT
A newly developed soil psychrometer will
aid scientists in accurately measuring the
relative humidity of air in the soil. The new
instrument was designed by Dr. Lorenzo A.
Richards and Dr. Gen Ogata at the U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture Salinity Laboratory, River-
side, California. It is capable of measuring differ-
ences in relative humidity as small as 1/2000 of
1 percent. It will make possible quantitative
measurements of soil moisture needed to deter-
mine the factors influencing availability of water
to plants. Research has shown that most plants
will grow if the relative humidity of air in the
soil is between 98.91 and 99.83 percent, but not
at 98.90 percent, although at this lower humidity
most plants will remain alive.
Bootlegging of amphetamine drugs is a
menace to safety on the Nation’s highways, the
Food and Drug Administration has asserted in
a special report on its efforts to curb illegal sales
of the stimulant pills to truck drivers and mo-
torists. The FDA crackdown was launched last
fall when it had more than 200 cases under
investigation. Since that time, 85 criminal
prosecutions have been completed; 31 additional
prosecutions have been instituted and are now
pending in Federal district courts; and in eight
separate actions, 1,837,000 tablets and capsules
of amphetamine drugs were seized. Defendants
in the actions involved truck stop operators,
grocers, and other peddlers; retail druggists who
sold without prescription or refilled without au-
thorization; and licensed practitioners who dis-
pensed the drugs without having established a
bona fide doctor-patient relationship.
8
Journal of The Washington Academy of Sciences
Vice-Presidents of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Representing the Affiliated Societies
Acoustical Society of America Richard Cook
Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences Not Named.
Anthropological Society of Washington Regina Flannery
Society of American Bacteriologists Mary Louise Robbins
Biological Society of Washington Herbert Friedman
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine Kathryn Knowlton
Botanical Society of Washington Herbert C. Hanson
Chemical Society of Washington William J. Bailey
American Society of Civil Engineers Not Named.
International Assn, for Dental Research Gerhard Brauer
American Inst, of Electrical Engineers Robert D. Elbourn
Washington Society of Engineers Howard S. Rappleye
Entomological Society of Washington Harold H. Shepard
Society of American Foresters Not Named.
National Geographic Society Alexander Wetmore
Geological Society of Washington Carle Dane
Helminthological Society of Washington Carlton M. Herman
Columbia Historical Society U. S. Grant, III
Insecticide Society of Washington Joseph Yuill
Amer. Society of Mechanical Engineers William G. Allen
Medical Society of the Dist. of Columbia Fred 0. Coe
American Society for Metals John A. Bennett
American Meteorological Society Morris Tepper
Institute of Radio Engineers Robert Huntoon
American Nuclear Society, Washington Section Urner Liddel
Philosophical Society of Washington Louis R. Maxwell
Society of American Military Engineers Not Named.
Chairmen of Committees
Standing Committees
Executive Lawrence A. Wood, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Meetings Robert D. Stiehler, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Membership Wayne C. Hall, Naval Research Laboratory
Monographs Dean B. Cowie, Dept, of Terrestrial Magnetism
Awards for Scientific Achievement Archie I. Mahan, Applied Physics Laboratory
Grants-in-Aid for Research B. D. van Ever a, George Washington University
Policy and Planning A. T. McPherson, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Encouragement of Science Talent Leo Schubert, American University
Science Education Raymond J. Seeger, Nat. Science Foundation
Special Committees
By Laws
Library of Congress
Repres. on AAAS Council
Harold H. Shepard, Dept, of Agriculture
John A. O’Keefe, Nat. Aeronautics & Space Admin.
Howard A. Meyerhoff, Scientific Manpower Commission
Volume 51
JANUARY 1961
No. 2
CONTENTS
Philip H. Abelson. Frank L. Campbell 1
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 3
Affiliated Societies 5
Calendar of Events __ __ 6
Academy Activities 6
The Brownstone Tower 6
Science and Development 8
Washington Academy of Sciences 2nd Class Postage
1530 — P St., N.W. Paid at
Washington, D. C. Washington. D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
LIBRARY or ARNOLD
ARBORETUM
22 Divinity ave
CAMBRIDGE 28 MASS
J
A A 5
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
Vol.51 • No. 2
FEBRUARY 1961
received c '
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington 1
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards j
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation I
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory I
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes ]
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and |
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news I
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears I
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing- J
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W., I
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone 1
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Lloyd N. Ferguson, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
A Message from the Retiring President—-
The Academy in the Sixties
Lawrence A. Wood
National Bureau of Standards
Scientific activity in the Washington
area, like that in the country as a whole,
has undergone a tremendous expansion
since 1940. Older governmental organiza-
tions employing scientists, like the Naval
Research Laboratory and the National
Bureau of Standards, have expanded ap-
preciably while newly-established labora-
tories like the National Institutes of
Health, the Naval Ordnance Laboratory,
and the Department of Agriculture’s Belts-
ville Research Center have entered the
picture with staffs numbering in the thou-
sands. Private organizations, said to be
almost 150 in number, also conduct re-
search and engage in development work.
Most of them are quite small, but a dozen
or more have staffs (including both tech-
nical and non-technical employees) num-
bering more than 300. Only about 10
percent of them were in existence in 1945.
The membership in the societies affili-
ated with the Washington Academy of
Sciences has likewise grown apace. The
Chemical Society of Washington alone
now has more than 2400 members. I am
not aware of any recent totalling of the
membership figures for all 27 component
societies, but it must be of the order of
10,000. The total number of people with
a scientific or engineering background in
the Washington area has been estimated
to be about 20,000.
Thus one can readily see that there is
an opportunity of considerable magni-
tude for a federation of societies to func-
tion in coordinating scientific activities
along common lines. The Washington
Academy of Sciences was organized in
1898 to serve this purpose.
Probably the most extensive cooperative
program of this sort is handled hy the
Joint Board on Science Education, estab-
lished in 1955 by the Academy and the
D. C. Council of Engineering and Archi-
tectural Societies. The detailed activities
of the Joint Board, as outlined in its 46-
page directory, will probably surprise
most members of the Academy by their
variety and magnitude. The index lists
the names of about 400 individuals who
are participating in the various activities
of the program. Another booklet, entitled
“Visiting Scientists and Engineers,” lists
181 topics for which speakers are avail-
able on request. A book, “Project Ideas
for Young Scientists,” contains over 400
suggestions for science projects. A monthly
publication, The Reporter , is sent free to
all the secondary school teachers of science
and mathematics in the area, numbering
about 1800.
The program has received national rec-
ognition, as shown by comments of college
officials and by the many inquiries re-
ceived from organizations in other parts
of the country.
This work on the secondary school level
might well be complemented by another
program aimed at coordinating and im-
proving scientific education on the univer-
sity and graduate school level in the Wash-
ington area. The Academy is doing noth-
ing in this field at present.
Another coordinating activity is the
weekly compilation of a science calendar
listing the meetings of scientific interest
in the area; this likewise is conducted in
February, 1961
9
collaboration with the D. C. Council.
In addition to being a federation of
societies, the Academy, as you all know,
includes individual members — that is,
“persons who by reason of original re-
search or scientific attainment are deemed
worthy of the honor of election.” The
total number of individual members has
grown from 531 in 1938 to about 1100 at
the present time. This is certainly a far
smaller proportion of the scientific work-
ers in the area than was the case in 1938.
It would be flattering to the present mem-
bers to think that this represents more
careful selection; but I fear that it merely
represents lethargy on the part of the
members in bringing in new candidates of
high qualifications. In any case, it would
seem that more activity along this line is
highly desirable. Recognition of scientific
attainment is certainly a worthwhile Acad-
emy function in which all its members can
and should participate. The Academy’s
annual awards for scientific achievement
to scientists no older than 40 could well
be made more substantial.
Like any other living organism, the
Academy cannot afford to remain static.
It must grow and change, adapting itself
to new conditions and new needs. The
establishment of an Academy office in 1958
and the alteration of the Journal , begun
in 1959 and still continuing, represent the
most important changes of the two years
preceding 1960. The past year saw the
adoption of revised bylaws and standing
rules. T feel that they are all worthwhile
accomplishments.
In the course of a year the Washington
Academy of Sciences can teach much to
any individual who is fortunate enough to
be its president. One gains insight into
some of its activities from continual re-
minders that new members must be ap-
pointed to its various committees and
panels. One becomes acquainted with the
multitude of scientific societies in the
Washington area by contacts with their
delegates in Academy Board meetings. One
receives intellectual stimulation from hear-
ing the lectures at its general membership
meetings. For all of this I am very
grateful.
In return it seems only fitting that a
president, on retiring into the state of
innocuous desuetude characteristic of ex-
presidents, should outline some specific re-
spects in which he thinks the operations of
the Academy might be improved.
The first recommendation I would make
is to change the operating year of the
Academy to begin on July 1, rather than
in January. It would then correspond to
the “academic year” of our educational
system and to the “fiscal year” of our
governmental agencies. The relatively in-
active summer period could be used effec-
tively by the new president in appointing
committees, by the treasurer in drawing
up a budget, by the Journal editor in
making his plans, and by the Meetings
Committee in selecting speakers. At pres-
ent, these arrangements must be made in
haste at the beginning of the calendar
year.
The second recommendation would be
for an increase of dues, with the major
portion of the increase going towards the
improvement of the Journal. A proposal
of this sort in 1959 was favored by a
majority of the members, but fell slightly
short of the two-thirds vote required
for amendments to the bylaws. Conse-
quently, the Journal has been hampered by
inadequate financial support.
The Academy organization at present
makes no formal use of the services of its
ex-presidents. Since a change in this situa-
tion could not be made before 1962, I can
safely recommend it now without the
possibility of incurring additional respon-
sibilities myself. In general, it would
seem that one who has been as familiar
with the affairs of the Academy as a presi-
dent is at the end of his term should be re-
tained for a time in some formal way in
the organizational scheme of the Academy.
The monthly meetings in the past few
years have been addressed by some out-
10
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
standing speakers on a wide variety of
topics. Attendance in the future should be
improved by the better publicity made pos-
sible by a more definitely-scheduled Jour-
nal. There can be no doubt of the necessity
of obtaining interesting, well-prepared
speakers lecturing on topics of general
interest. Topics dealing with interdisciplin-
ary subjects, with international scientific
relations, with the government’s part in
science, and with the history of science
seem to me to be especially suitable types.
Academy Presents
John K. Taylor
National Bureau of Standards
The Academy’s 63rd Annual Meeting
and Dinner, held on January 19, featured
the presentation of awards for scientific
achievement to six local scientists and
educators.
The Academy awards program was initi-
ated in 1939 to recognize young scientists
in the local area for “noteworthy discov-
ery, accomplishment, or publication” in
the fields of biology, engineering, and the
physical sciences. Awards for outstanding
teaching were added in 1955, while mathe-
matics was included for the first time
in 1959.
The awards consist of scrolls engrossed
with a citation. Beginning with the cur-
rent year, they also include election to
membership in the Academy with remis-
sion of dues for the first two years.
Award winners must be under 40 years
of age in all cases except in teaching, for
which no age limit is set. Nominations,
obtained from Academy members and from
local scientific institutions, are evaluated
by committees composed of members of
the Academy distinguished in the fields of
science involved.
At the annual dinner, Archie I. Mahan,
chairman of the Awards Committee, in-
troduced the heads of the organizations
The very diversity of the Academy oper-
ations requires the cooperation of many in-
dividuals. Those who are participating in
one activity should appreciate the extent
and importance of the other activities. The
federative activities, the honorary awards,
the science education program, the monthly
meetings, and the Journal all are import-
ant facets of the Washington Academy of
Sciences as it enters the decade of the
sixties.
Awards to Six
represented by the award winners. These
officials, in turn, commented upon the
achievements of the candidates. Presenta-
tion of the awards was made by Lawrence
A. Wood, president of the Academy dur-
ing 1960, the award year.
The award for biological sciences was
made to Louis S. Baron of the Walter Reed
Army Institute for Research. Dr. Baron
did his undergraduate work at City College
and his graduate work at the University of
Illinois, from which he received the Ph.D.
degree in 1951. He joined the staff of the
Department of Immunology at Walter Reed
and has been chief of that Department
since 1956.
Dr. Baron’s research activities have been
concerned with various aspects of bac-
terial gentics, especially the relation of
changes in antigenic and enzymatic com-
position. He was cited for “work on genetic
recombination in different genera and
tribes of bacteria.”
The award in the physical sciences was
made to Richard A. Ferrell of the Physics
Department, University of Maryland, who
received his bachelor’s degree at California
Institute of Technology after an outstand-
February, 1961
11
Award Winners at Annual Academy Meeting
L. S. Baron
R. E. Bowles
P. J. Davis
Pauline Diamond
R. A. Ferrell
K. F. Herzfeld
ing undergraduate record. His Ph.D. degree
was obtained at Princeton University in
1952.
After an AEC postdoctoral fellowship,
he joined the faculty of the University of
Maryland and was elevated to professorial
rank in 1959. He has also been a recent
recipient of an NSF postdoctoral fellow-
ship.
Dr. Ferrell has achieved international
recognition in the field of theoretical
physics. He was cited in particular for
“contributions to the theory of collective
effects in nuclei and solids.”
Romald E. Bowles of the Diamond Ord-
nance Fuze Laboratory received the award
for scientific achievement in engineering.
Dr. Bowles, a native of the local area, at-
tended Roosevelt High School and the Uni-
versity of Maryland. Most of his profes-
sional career has been at DOFL, which
he joined in 1954. While employed there,
he attended the University of Maryland
graduate school part-time and received the
Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering in
1957. His present position at DOFL is that
of a supervisory mechanical engineer.
Dr. Bowles has done extensive pioneer-
ing work in the theory and development of
fluid amplifiers without moving parts,
which promise to create a revolution in the
field of automatic control. He was cited for
“distinguished service in starting and lead-
ing research on pneumatic control de-
vices without moving parts.”
The award for mathematics was presented
to Philip J. Davis of the National Bureau
of Standards. Dr. Davis received the Ph.D.
degree in mathematics from Harvard Uni-
versity in 1949. After a period of post-
doctoral research at Harvard and a one-
year period at American University, he
joined the staff of NBS in 1953 and is now
chief of the Numerical Analysis Section,
Applied Mathematics Division.
Dr. Davis’ chief research interest is in
12
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
the field of functional analysis. He was
cited for “contributions to the theory of
analytic functions and numerical analysis.”
Presentation of the award for teaching
college and university science was made to
Karl F. Herzfeld of Catholic University.
Born in Vienna, Dr. Herzfeld received the
Ph.D. degree from the University of Vienna
in 1914. During the period 1926 to 1936,
he served on the faculty at Johns Hopkins
University. He has been associated with
Catholic University since 1936, where he
is professor and head of the Physics De-
partment.
Dr. Herzfeld, a member of the National
Academy of Sciences, has had a distin-
guished career in physics including the
fields of ultrasonics, quantum theory, and
solid state physics. The present award, how-
ever, was for his outstanding teaching:
the citation reads, “in recognition of his
distinguished services as a teacher of
physics, and his lasting influence on the
lives of his students.”
Pauline Diamond, who teaches chemistry
and physics at Sherwood High School,
Sandy Spring, Md., received the award for
outstanding teaching of high school science.
After receiving the A.B. degree from Brook-
lyn College in 1940, Mrs. Diamond was
employed during the war years at the Na-
tional Bureau of Standards, where she con-
ducted research in electrical measurements
and in pH determinations. She is now in
her sixth year of teaching at Sherwood.
Mrs. Diamond has taken an active in-
terest in science education activities out-
side of the classroom, especially in matters
concerned with science fairs in Montgomery
County. Her citation reads, “in recogni-
tion of effectiveness as a teacher of chem-
istry and physics, resulting in the choice of
careers in science by many of her students.”
Plant Disease Control
Without Chemicals *
Harold T. Cook
Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
The title may suggest that the subject
of this paper was chosen because of the
current interest in pesticidal residues and
food additives resulting from the recent
amendments to the Food, Drug and Cos-
metic Act and the cranberry episode of last
year. Actually, my interest in plant dis-
ease control without chemicals antedates
the present furor over pesticidal residues
by about 30 years.
Fungicides are useful and necessary for
control of some plant diseases, but too
often plant pathologists resort to them
when other methods may be more effec-
tive, practical, and economical. Ever since
* Address of the retiring president of the Botani-
cal Society of Washington, December 1960.
the discovery of bordeaux mixture by Mil-
lardet in 1882, fungicides have played a
major role in plant disease control. Their
use has been accelerated in recent years by
extensive commercial advertising and a vast
army of salesmen.
Disillusionment about standard chemi-
cal treatments came early in my profes-
sional career. Soon after I became plant
pathologist at the Virginia Truck Experi-
ment Station in 1930, I was directed to
revise the Station bulletin on sweet potato
diseases. Since I had never seen a sweet
potato except on the dinner table, I put
my trust in recommendations in farmer’s
bulletins and experiment station bulletins.
I recommended treating the seed potatoes
February, 1961
13
with bichloride of mercury and warned in
boldface type how to handle the deadly
poison. I recommended coating the bot-
tom end of each sprout with copper or
sulfur dust before planting. And finally, T
recommended fumigating the storage house
with formaldehyde or spraying the walls
and floors with copper sulfate solution,
whitewash, or lime-sulfur.
These were standard recommendations,
but they didn’t control disease in demon-
stration plots I planted to show farmers
how to grow healthy sweet potatoes. Later
1 found why the chemical treatments didn’t
work, and developed non-chemical meth-
ods that were more effective and practical.
There are many advantages to non-
chemical methods for controlling plant
diseases :
1. They are often cheaper, since there is
no cost for fungicidal materials and
equipment and labor for applying them.
2. They are often more practical, since it
is difficult or impossible to spray or dust
at frequent and regular intervals.
3. Mechanical injury by sprayers and dust-
ers is avoided.
4. Chemical injury by fungicides is
avoided.
5. There are no unsightly or toxic residues.
6. Disease control is sometimes more com-
plete.
The non-chemical methods for plant
disease control are based on rather simple
and basic principles:
1. Elimination of the microorganism that
causes disease by hot water seed treat-
ment, heat treatment of vegetative parts,
growing seed in dry areas where the
disease does not develop, propagation
methods that remove diseased parts, and
sanitation.
2. Preventing infection by avoiding in-
juries and promoting formation of nat-
ural barriers to infection.
3. Retarding infection and development of
disease by refrigeration and controlled
moisture.
4. Planned marketing so that products are
used before spoilage occurs.
5. Use of disease-resistant varieties.
There are numerous examples of plant
disease control by these methods. Some are
so firmly established that they are taken
for granted. Time will permit discussion
of only a few.
Bean anthracnose was the most serious
disease of beans in states east of the Mis-
sissippi until 1927. Numerous attempts to
control it by chemical seed treatments and
field sprays failed. Breeding for resistance
was complicated by the existence of three
strains of the fungus. The disease has
been almost completely eliminated since
1927 simply by growing disease-free seed
in the arid western states where the air
is too dry for the fungus to develop on
the seed pods and infect the seed. Previ-
ously, much of the bean seed was grown
in Michigan and western New York, where
the weather was often favorable for an-
thracnose.
Bacterial blight is another seed-borne
disease of beans that is controlled by grow-
ing seed in western states, especially in
certain parts of California. Numerous wet
and dry chemical seed treatments were
tested before this simple and effective con-
trol was found.
Black rot is an important disease of
cabbage and related crops. For many
years, treating the seed with bichloride of
mercury was recommended, but only in-
complete control was obtained. Research
recently showed that some seed is intern-
ally infected so that chemical treatment
could not be expected to be effective. Hot
water seed treatment gave complete con-
trol, but was not practical for treating
large volumes of seed. Fortunately, hot
water seed treatment is no longer neces-
sary because most of the seed is now
grown in Pacific coast states where it does
not become infected. Blackleg, another
cabbage disease that was formerly im-
portant, also has been nearly eliminated
by using western-grown seed.
Celery is sprayed weekly from the time
the plants come up until it is harvested, to
control the leaf blights. It is a costly and
messy operation and does not control
14
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
blight satisfactorily in bad years. Much
trimming and washing are necessary to
remove spray residue before marketing.
These celery diseases may be controlled
and the need for spraying eliminated by
treating the seed with hot water and crop
rotation. Chemical seed treatments are
only partly effective because the fungi are
within the seed coat.
The effectiveness of hot water seed treat-
ment was strikingly demonstrated in com-
mercial plantings at Norfolk. Va., in 1941.
Blight had caused heavy losses there in
1940. The next season, six of the nine
growers accepted the Experiment Station
offer to treat their seed. Blight destroyed
the celery of the three growers whose seed
was not treated. Four of the growers using
treated seed had no blight. The other two
had blight only in the beds where they
used plants obtained from neighbors whose
seed was not treated.
Hot water and hot air treatments of
vegetative parts have been used to control
virus diseases of peaches, cranberries, and
sugar cane, red rot of sugar cane, and black
rot of sweet potatoes.
Black rot is a major disease of sweet
potatoes. Some may be found at harvest,
but usually infection is not noticeable un-
til several weeks later. Sweet potatoes that
are washed before packing may be infected
by spores in the wash water. Black rot that
develops during transit may make the en-
tire lot unsalable when it reaches the
market.
Standard recommendations for black
rot are to discard seed potatoes with black
rot and to treat the remaining ones in
bichloride of mercury. This treatment kills
black rot spores on the surface but not the
fungus in the spots. Spotted potatoes that
escape detection and are bedded produce
diseased sprouts and cause black rot in the
next crop.
An easier and more effective way to con-
trol black rot is to cut the sprouts above
the seed bed soil line instead of pulling
them. Since black rot occurs only on the
underground stem, only the healthy part is
planted. Sprout cuttings live and yield as
well as field sprouts.
Scurf is another major sweet potato
disease that may be easily eliminated by
planting sprout cuttings. Chemical seed
and sprout treatments that have been rec-
ommended have little effect on scurf.
Sanitation is an effective control meas-
ure and need not involve chemicals. Fumi-
gation of sweet potato storage houses with
formaldehyde is still recommended. It is
an expensive and unpleasant task and I
don’t know of any experimental evidence
to justify it. Thorough sweeping or wash-
ing down of the storage will probably do
as much or more good.
Preventing infection is important in con-
trolling many market diseases. Once the
pathogen has entered the fruit or vegetable
it is beyond reach of most fungicides.
Many years ago, U. S. Department of
Agriculture workers showed that much de-
cay in California oranges started at me-
chanical injuries that occurred during har-
vesting, packing, and shipping. Fruit with
no apparent injury when packed had only
1.8 percent decay at destination in con-
trast to 26.9 percent in visibly injured
fruit. Improved handling has markedly re-
duced decay in commercial shipments with-
out the aid of chemicals.
Heating, chilling, and freezing may cause
physiological changes and physical damage
that are followed by decay. Alternaria de-
cay of tomatoes, peppers, and acorn squash,
and penicillium decay of sweet potatoes,
are examples of decay that follows chilling
injury. Unchilled tissues are not affected
by these fungi, but decay develops rapidly
after chilling. Chilling injury occurs in
tomatoes and sweet potatoes below 55°F.,
and in acorn squash and peppers at 45°
or lower. Chemical treatments give little if
any protection. The logical remedy is to
avoid exposure to conditions that cause
such injury.
Formation of natural barriers in injured
tissues prevents decay in potatoes and sweet
February, 1961
15
potatoes. These vegetables are unavoidably
cut. broken, and skinned during harvest-
ing, cleaning, and packing, but the injured
tissues heal and wall out the decay patho-
gens in potatoes that are kept at 70° F. or
higher in a humid atmosphere. These heal-
ing properties are utilized to prevent soft
rot and browning of new potatoes during
transit. Instead of using low temperatures
to check decay, moderate temperatures are
maintained in the rail cars so the injured
tissues will heal. Healing also is used to
reduce seed piece decay before and after
planting. Chemical treatments are unneces-
sary and may interfere with healing and
increase decay.
Curing sweet potatoes at 85 °F. in a
humid atmosphere after harvest gives ex-
cellent control of rhizopus rot. Recuring
the potatoes after they are washed and
packed for market is a promising method
of reducing decay in transit and at the
market.
Refrigeration controls many post-harvest
diseases. But the amount of refrigeration
that may be used depends on the fruit or
vegetable. Some may be stored at 32 °F.
but others, like tomatoes, are injured and
made more susceptible to decay by chill-
ing temperatures considerably above freez-
ing. The temperatures used must be tailored
to the particular fruit or vegetable. Tem-
peratures below 40° are safe for oranges
and retard penicillium and stem end rots.
Rhizopus causes no visible decay in peaches
after six days at 45°, but 36° is necessary
to retard brown rot an equal amount.
Recent research has shown that rhizopus
decay in cannery peaches can be reduced
from 4.7 percent to 0.5 percent simply by
storing the fruit at 31 °F. for 14 days
before ripening instead of ripening imme-
diately. Canners get two or three more
cases per ton when peaches are handled this
way. Chemical treatments failed to give
satisfactory decay control.
Humidity control is important for con-
trolling disease. Aeration is a practical
method of reducing moldiness in stored
grain. Fungicides are not effective, and if
they were would leave undesirable residues.
Prompt drying and maintenance of low
humidity are especially important to pre-
vent heavy losses from onion neck rot.
Free moisture favors decay of stored
root crops. Crater rot, rhizopus, sclerotinia,
and botrytis decays cause serious damage
to carrots that are continuously wet by
water dripping from overhead brine coils.
Such decay has been almost completely
eliminated in some storages simply by
erecting a kraft paper awning over the
carrots to shed the water.
Planned marketing based on the pre-
dicted keeping quality of different lots of
fruits or vegetables reduces disease losses.
Decay during storage varies in different
lots of California grapes. More decay
occurs in grapes from some vineyards than
others, and in grapes harvested soon after
rainy periods. The grapes that will have
least decay in storage may be identified
soon after harvest by placing samples of
each lot under conditions that accelerate
decay. This makes it possible to market
lots that will decay badly if stored too
long, while they are still in good condition.
Some California grape producers have used
this method as a marketing guide for sev-
eral years. A similar method is being used
to forecast bull’s-eye rot in stored north-
western apples.
Plant disease control by use of disease-
resistant varieties is well established. It
is a very effective method, but many years
are required to develop an assortment of
desirable resistant varieties, and progress
is frequently nullified by the appearance of
new strains of the pathogenic fungi.
I have cited only a few examples of
successful plant disease control without
chemicals. There are many others. Many
diseases now unsatisfactorily controlled by
chemicals would probably respond to non-
chemical methods.
16
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
FEBRUARY MEETING
(455th Meeting of the Washington Academy of Sciences)
ADDRESS OF THE RETIRING PRESIDENT
SPEAKER
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
SUBJECT
Unorthodoxy in Science
DATE
Thursday, February 16, 1961, 8:15 p.m.
PLACE
John Wesley Poivell Auditorium, Cosmos Club, 2170 Florida Ave., N.W.
where he changed
THE S P E A K E II —
Law rence A. Wood was
born in Peekskill, N.Y.,
in 1904. He received
the A.B. degree in
chemistry and mathe-
matics from Hamilton
College in 1925. He
then transferred for
his graduate work to
Cornell U n iversity,
his field of science to
physics and received the Ph.D. degree in
1932. He remained at Cornell as an instruc-
tor in physics for three subsequent years,
conducting research in the field of electric-
ity, then came to the National Bureau of
Standards in 1935 as a member of the
Rubber Section. In 1943 he became chief
of this Section, a position which he still
holds.
Dr. Wood’s scientific career was reviewed
in the Journal for February, 1960. For his
oustanding research achievements he re-
ceived the Academy’s 1943 award for
achievement in the physical sciences. In
1958 he received a meritorius service award
from the Department of Commerce for
his valuable fundamental contributions to
the science and technology of rubber.
Dr. Wood has always shown much interest
in scientific societies, both locally and na-
tionally. In addition to being a member and
immediate past president of the Washington
Academy of Sciences, he is a member of
the American Chemical Society, member
and past president (in 1955) of the Philo-
sophical Society of Washington, and a fellow
of the American Physical Society. He was
a founder of the APS Division of High
Polymer Physics, and its chairman in 1947.
ABSTRACT OF THE ADDRESS— Some
scientific concepts, when they are first pro-
posed, are distinctly not in accord with the
accepted ideas of their time. Later, some
of them receive general recognition and
are incorporated into the body of general
scientific knowledge. It is instructive to
study specific examples of unorthodoxy in
science to see if there are distinguishing
general characteristics which may he useful
in predicting the probable fate of the con-
cept. The human motives and personal
factors involved in scientific activities must
not be underestimated. Examples, drawn
largely from the physical sciences, include,
among others : Copernicus’ concept of the
solar system, Galileo’s mechanics of falling
bodies. Young’s wave theory of light, the
theory of conservation of energy, Pasteur’s
theories of bacterial action, Planck’s quan-
tcm theory, N-rays, Ehrenhaft’s sub-electrons
and single magnet poles, Klingelfuss’ com-
putation of electrical constants, Rupp’s ar-
ticial positrons and polarization of electron
beams, para-psycliology and extra-sensory
perception, and the magneto-optical method
of chemical analysis.
February, 1961
17
Summary Annual Report of Treasurer for 1960
Washington Academy of Sciences
Receipts
Dues
Life membership
Journal subscriptions and reprints
Sales of Journal back numbers
Sales of Monograph No. 1 and Index
Interest, dividends, and capital gains
Fiscal services to Joint Board on NSF grant administration
Unused portion of $500 grant
Miscellaneous receipts (meetings, grants, gifts, etc.)
Total
$ 5,290.75
25.00
3,125.63
618.19
19.30
3,673.12
403.71
79.04
567.70
$13,802.44
Expenditures
Journal (printing, mailing, etc., for 8 issues) $ 4,528.87
Routine operations, officers and meetings 2,254.35
Headquarters office expenses including Social Security 5,599.13
Directory 274.75
Custodian of Publications 422.42
Annual dinner 339.00
Grant, Joint Board on Science Education 500.00
Grant-in-aid, WAS Committee on Encouragement of Science Talent 300.00
Grants, reimbursable 100.85
A A AS’ academy conference 20.00
Science calendar 75.00
Certificates, Awards Committee 5.77
Debits, memos and refunds 17.22
Total $14,437.36
Excess disbursements over receipts $634.92
Summary of Cash Balances
12/31/59
Washington Academy of Sciences $ 6,321.82
Washington Junior Academy of Sciences 1,337.04
NSF grant administration (Joint Board) 21,737.08
Totals $29,395.94
12/31/60 Decrease
$ 5.686.90 $ 634.92
781.91 555.13
19,856.38 1,880.70
$26,325.19' $ 3,070.75
Summary of Receipts and Expenditures, 1960
Washington Academy of Sciences
Washington Junior Academy of Sciences
NSF grant administration (Joint Board) .
Totals
Receipts Expenditures R less E
$13,802.44 $14,437.36 — $ 634.92
4,140.50 4.695.63 — 555.13 j
35,914.35 37,795.05 — 1,880.70 j
$53,857.29 $56,928.04 $3,070.75
Summary of Grant, National Science Foundation to WAS (Administered by Joint Board on
Science Education)
Balance in WAS checking account on 12/31/59 $21,737.08
Additions to grant during 1960 35,914.35
Total $57,657.43
Expended or returned to NSF during 1960 37,795.05
Cash balance on 12/31/60 $19,856.38
I
18
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Summary of Assets
—Carl I. Aslakson, Treasurer , 1960
Summary Annual Report of Secretary for 1960
In order to summarize the activities more ex-
tensively reported by the various officers and
chairmen of committees at the annual meeting,
the Secretary has prepared the following facts
regarding the Academy’s vital statistics. As of
the end of the calendar year 1960, the Academy
had the following numbers of members in the
respective categories:
Resident
Active 775 (+16)
Retired .... 67 ( + 16)
Patron 0
Honorary 0
Subtotal . 842
Total membership
Nonresident
Active 180 ( — 16)
Retired 69 ( + 15)
Patron 0
Honorary 6
Subtotal 255
1,097 (+31)
The parenthetic figures show the net change
over 1959. The Membership Committee inherited
15 nominations at the beginning of the year and
made recommendations for 83 new memberships.
Of the latter, 22 are still pending election by
the Board and 61 have been so elected and in-
vited to become members. A total of 66 new mem-
bers have been brought into the Academy; but
due to resignation and deaths our net gain in
membership is only 31 as shown above.
Losses in membership reported in 1960 due to
deaths are listed herewith with the date of de-
ceased when known:
Arthur C. Baker (September 11, 1959) ; Harley
H. Bartlett (February 13, 1960) ; Paul Bartsch
(April 24, 1960) ; Peter Chrzanowski (April 14,
1960) ; Carroll E. Cox (June 24, 1960) ; Arthur
L. Day (February 2, 1960) ; Howard A. Edson
(February 29, 1960) ; Julia Gardner (November
15, 1960) ; Beno Gutenberg (January 25, 1960) ;
Ernest L. Jackson (June 14, 1960) ; Frank C.
Kracek (July 5, 1960) ; Leo Loeb (December
28, 1959) ; Paul Schureman (September 20,
1959) ; Joseph F. Siler; Paul K. Smith (October
6, 1960) ; George W. Stose (January 30, 1960).
During the academic year the meetings of the
Academy heard Frank L. Campbell, retiring presi-
dent, speak on “The Amateur and the Academy”
— a plea for the recognition of those persons who
through self-education and discipline have pro-
duced very fine research in fields out of their
area of formal training. His lecture was illus-
trated by the work of two such amateurs — Walter
C. O’Kane on “Tree Flowers,” and Alvah Peter-
son on “Insect Eggs.” In March, the Academy
met jointly with the Junior Academy to award
certificates of merit; and it heard Louis H. Bean
talk on “The Science and Art of Predicting,” a
subject in which he has great competence as
proved by his ability to interpret trends to the
political and economic satisfaction of his ad-
herents. In April, the Academy heard David H.
Johnson, curator of mammals at the National
Museum, give his views on the distribution of
mammals on islands in the Pacific Ocean. He
stressed the special adaptations that successful
migrant species needed to surmount distributional
barriers. In May, W. O. Baker, vice president
of the Bell Telephone Laboratories, spoke to the
Academy on “Logical Processes in Creatures and
Crystals.” He explored the analogy of digital in-
formation coding of perception and experience.
During the summer months the Academy sus-
pended its meetings, but reconvened in October
to hear S. L. Madorsky give his impressions of
a recent trip to Russia, where he and his wife
had the advantages of linguistic parity and in-
formal, friendly reception by scientists. The meet-
ing was heavily attended, and some members were
unable to hear the presentation. In November,
the Academy met jointly with the Washington
Chapter of Sigma Xi and the Junior Academy
to hear E. B. Wilson discuss the introduction of
young people to scientific research as a career.
A lively discussion by many members of the
February, 1961
19
Junior Academy followed this talk. On Decem-
ber 15, a concatenation of early winter and the
secretary’s failure to get out notices resulted in
the meagerest attendance at one of the most in-
teresting and timely presentations that the Meet-
ings Committee has been able to arrange — a
presentation by Harry Wexler of the Weather
Bureau on the use of televising satellites in
analyzing and predicting world-wide weather
effects. Dr. Wexler’s grace and good humor in
the face of the restrictions imposed by his every-
day adversary, the weather, were much appre-
ciated by the audience that braved the storm
to hear him.
In January 1961, the annual dinner meeting of
the Academy witnessed the presentation of the
annual awards for distinguished service:
Biology — Louis S. Baron, Walter Reed Army
Institute for Research; Engineering — Romald E.
Bowles, Diamond Ordnance Fuze Laboratory;
Physical sciences — Richard A. Ferrell, University
of Maryland; Mathematics — Philip J. Davis, Na-
ational Bureau of Standards; Teaching of science
(high school) — Pauline Diamond, Sherwood High
School; Teaching of science (graduate) — Karl
F. Herzfeld, Catholic University.
During the course of the year, the adoption of
the new Bylaws and Standing Rules has improved
the relationship between the Academy and its
affiliates and permitted their freer cooperation.
It is hoped that more active interest of the af-
filiates will be engendered also by the experi-
mentation with the content of the Journal, espe-
cially as it affects the overall interests of the
Washington scientific community. The disaffection
of some members on the decision to cease using
the Journal for primary publication of experi-
mental and descriptive research has been dis-
tressing to the Board and its officers; but para-
doxically it proved to be the final incentive to
generate new publications specifically and cate-
gorically dedicated to such publication. Should
the efforts of succeeding Boards be successful
in raising the pitifully inadequate dues ($6.00),
the Academy may be in a position to devise means
and to support other needs of its community, in-
cluding archival publication if this is indeed a
problem. Goals for the immediate future are the
synthesis of disciplines and categorical fields into
stimulating cross-fertilizations through symposia
and conferences.
The support of science education has been in-
creasingly successful with the granting of funds
to the Academy for this purpose, and the use
of these by the Joint Board on Science Educa-
tion to pursue experimental approaches to teach-
ing mathematics and physics or chemistry to-
gether. A roster of speakers and counselors is
also now maintained for the use of metropolitan
area school science teachers and clubs. The spon-
sorship of minor financial aid to selected students
engaged in summer laboratory experience has
been a successful venture of the Junior Academy
beyond its usual activities in Science Fair pro-
motion.
Heinz Specht, Secretary, 1960
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical
committees, civic activities, and marriages, births,
and other family news. Formal contributors have
been assigned for the systematic collection of
news at institutions employing considerable
numbers of Academy members (see list on mast-
head). However, for the bulk of the membership,
we must rely on individuals to send us news
concerning themselves and their friends. Con-
tributions may be addressed to Harold T. Cook.
Associate Editor, care of Agricultural Marketing
Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Rm.
3917 South Bldg., W ashington 25, D. C.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
Elliott B. Roberts is the author of a detailed
review article, “The IGY in Retrospect,” recently
published in the Smithsonian Report for 1959.
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Ira B. Hansen, professor of zoology, and
Charles R. Naeser, professor of chemistry, were
recently elected to represent Columbian College
on the newly-constituted University Senate. This
body will be the senior group representing faculty
interests in the affairs of the University.
Benjamin D. Van Evera visited University !
establishments at Monterey, Calif., and El Paso, j
Tex., with Acting President Colclough, in early
December, to survey units of the Human Re-
sources Research Office.
Mary L. Robbins, professor of bacteriology, j
has been appointed a member of the newly- j
created Film Project Advisory Board of the Na- |
tional Science Teachers Association, and a 1
member of the Administrative Committee of the i
Board. She spoke before the Third Conference
on the Participation of Women in Science, De-
cember 27, at the AAAS meetings in New York.
Ernestine B. Thurman, NIH, served as chair-
20
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
man of the conference.
HARRIS RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Louis R. Mizell has been elected chairman
and Edmund M. Buras, Jr., treasurer of the
Washington Section of the American Associa-
tion of Textile Chemists and Colorists for 1961.
Both are project leaders at HRL.
On January 14, Mr. Buras participated in the
conference on “Chemistry Teaching in the Wash-
ington Metropolitan Area” sponsored by the Joint
Board on Science Education.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
Academy members presenting papers at recent
meetings have included the following:
Samuel N. Alexander, “The Russian Ap-
proach vs. the American Approach to Computers
and Data Processing” — Civil Service Commission
Seminar, Brookings Institution, Washington, De-
cember 9; Roger G. Bates, “The Use of Amine
Buffers for pH Control” — Conference on “In
Vitro and In Vivo Effects of Amine Buffers” —
New York Academy of Sciences. New York, De-
cember 12: Irvin H. Fullmer, “Some Funda-
mentals of Modern Dimensional Metrology” —
Huntsville Chapter, American Society of Tool and
Manufacturing Engineers, Huntsville, Ala., Jan-
uary 5; Forest K. Harris, “The Status of Elec-
trical Standards” — Precision Measurements As-
sociation, Los Angeles, January 4; Charles M.
Herzfeld, “The Standards Laboratory and Rocket
Testing”— American Rocket Society, Washington,
December 5-6; John D. Hoffman, “Crystalliza-
tion of Polymers from Bulk and Dilute Solution”
— Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cam-
bridge, Mass., January 5; George C. Paffen-
barger, “Dimensional Stability of Dentures” —
U. S. Naval Dental Clinic, Norfolk, Va., in De-
cember; and Earle K. Plyler, “High Resolution
Spectroscopy of the Infrared Region” — Indian
Academy of Science, Madras, India. December
27.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
G. Robert Coatney, chief of the Laboratory
of Parasite Chemotherapy, National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, recently returned
from Geneva, Switzerland, where he served as
chairman of the Technical Committee on Chemo-
therapy of Malaria, World Health Organization,
November 14-19. Dr. Coatney is the newly-elected
president-elect of the American Society of Tropi-
cal Medicine and Hygiene.
OPERATIONS RESEARCH OFFICE, JHU
Bernard B. Watson served as editor of “The
Delayed Effects of Whole-body Radiation: A Sym-
posium,” recently published by the Johns Hop-
kins Press.
USDA, BELTSVILLE
Erwin L. LeClerg, director of Biometrical
Services, ARS, participated in a program review
of the Biometrics Unit of the Department of Plant
Breeding, Cornell University, in October. On No-
vember 7, Dr. LeClerg presented a paper at the
Second National Congress of Entomology and
Phytopathology at Chapingo, Mex.
WEATHER BUREAU
Charles S. Gilman left October 15 for a two-
year assignment with the UN at Santiago, Chile.
DEATHS
Joseph S. Wade died on January 1 at the age
of 80. He served with the Department of Agri-
culture from 1906 until his retirement in 1950.
After retirement, he continued with the Depart-
ment as an official collaborator. Mr. Wade was a
native of Cumberland County, Ky. He was edu-
cated at Fairmount College, Wichita, Kans., at
Iowa Slate University, and at the University of
Chicago. His research was concerned with insects
injurious to cereal and forage crops in the central
and plains states. Mr. Wade was the author of
more than 600 publications on scientific, historical,
and literary subjects. He was a former president
of the Entomological Society of Washington and
the Biological Society of Washington.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America, Washington
Chapter
At the January 16 meeting, Wayne D. Wilson,
Naval Ordnance Laboratory, spoke on “Sound
Velocity, its Measurement, and Applications.”
The meeting was preceded by an informal dinner
at the Cafe Burgundy.
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
On January 10, Herbert Friedman, Naval Re-
search Laboratory, addressed the Section on “Re-
cent Results of Upper Atmosphere Research.”
The Student Guidance Committee is address-
ing itself anew to the problem of impressing upon
gifted students the challenges, opportunities, and
potential rewards of careers in science or engi-
neering.
The Science and Electronics Division held its
first meeting on December 15, featuring a talk by
David Cook, Naval Research Laboratory, on “Ele-
mentary Particles and Their Detection.” A sec-
ond Division, Telemetry and Instrumentation,
met on January 9 to hear Gilbert Jaffee, Navy
Hydrographies Office, on “Under-Sea Exploration
Instruments and Equipment.” The cancelled De-
cember meeting has been rescheduled for March.
February, 1961
21
American Society of Civil Engineers, Nation-
al Capital Section
Dean Cornelius Wandmacher, University of
Cincinnati, was the principal speaker at a joint
meeting:, January 10, on current trends in engi-
neering education, with the American Society of
Engineering Education, National Capital Area.
He reported on the Conference of Civil Engineer-
ing Education held last July at Ann Arbor, Mich.,
at which proposals were made for modifying the
context and extending the period of instruction.
The January luncheon meeting, on the 24th,
presented Waldo G. Bowman, editor of Engineer-
ing Neius Record, reporting on a recently-com-
pleted world tour.
Four programs remain in the 1961 Forum
Series, which compares United States resources
policy and administration with those of other
nations; admission is unrestricted, and programs
are scheduled for 2 to 4 p.m. at the Brookings
Institute, 1775 Massachusetts Ave.
February 2 — National Park Administration in
England.
February 16 — Regional Resources Development
in Southern France.
March 2 — Preservation of Natural Areas in
Great Britain.
March 16 — Pollution Abatement in the Ruhr
Valley of Western Germany.
Botanical Society of Washington
Officers elected in December are: President,
W. D. McClellan, US’D A; vice-president, Robert
W. Krauss. University of Maryland; recording
secretary, R. A. Paterson, University of Mary-
land; corresponding secretary, Marie Lack,
USDA: treasurer, A. A. Piringer, USD A; and
councillors. Father Duman, and Richard Cowan.
On January 3 Chester Emmons, NIH, spoke
on fungi pathogenic to man with special refer-
ence to natural infections and the ecology of in-
fection initiation.
Chemical Society of Washington
Incoming officers for 1961 are William J. Bailey,
president; John L. Torgesen, president-elect; Sam-
uel B. Detwiler, Jr., secretary; and Leo Schubert,
treasurer.
At the Board of Managers meeting on January
10, the Society’s 1961 budget was approved in
the amount of $4,575. Estimated income for 1961
is $5,826, as compared with $3,698 in 1960.
At the same meeting, President Bailey reported
on the activities of a Special Committee on
Member Participation, which over the past several
months has been conducting a survey of member
interests. Although the survey has been only par-
tially completed, it already has brought to light
the fact that a large number of Sociey members,
not now engaged in committee work, would like
to be so engaged. Pursuant to this report, the
Board approved the establishment of three new
special committees — on employment, boy scout
chemistry merit badge counseling, and women’s
programs. Another contemplated new field of
activity — science fair project counseling — will be
handled by the Standing Committee on Education.
It was announced that Frank T. McClure of
the Applied Physics Laboratory had won the So-
ciety’s 1960 Hillebrand Award. Dr. McClure will
be guest of honor at the annual Hillebrand
Award Dinner, to be held on March 9.
Entomological Society of Washington
Newly installed officers are: President, J. F.
Gates Clarke, National Museum; president-elect,
Harold H. Shepard, USDA; recording secretary,
Ernestine B. Thurman, NIH; corresponding sec-
retary, Paul A. Woke, NIH; treasurer. Price G.
Piquett, US’DA.
Geological Society of Washington
Three papers were presented at the January 11
meeting: L. L. Thatcher and C. W. Carlston,
“Tritium in the Hydrologic Cycle”; Mark W.
Pangborn, Jr., “Geology and Geologists in Fic-
tion”; and George H. Drury, Hydrologic Impli-
cations of Meandering Valleys.”
Present officers are: President, G. Arthur
Cooper; first vice-president, Harold M. Banner-
man; second vice-president, C. L. McGuinness;
secretaries, John T. Hack and Frank C. Whit-
more, Jr.; and treasurer, Margaret Cooper.
Helminthological Society ol Washington
Officers for 1961. installed in December are:
President, Lloyd E. Rozeboom, Johns Hopkins
University; vice-president, Carlton M. Herman,
Patuxent Research Refuge; corresponding secre- I
tary-treasurer, Edna M. Buhrer, USDA; and
recording secretary, A. James Haley, University
of Maryland.
Insecticide Society of W ashington
On January 18, W. E. Westlake, Agricultural
Research Service, spoke on "Recent Developments
in Instruments for Pesticide Residue Analysis ;
and Arthur D. Moore spoke on “Probing Some
of the ‘What’s’ and ‘W hy’s’ in Insecticidal Control
of Forest Insects.”
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
John W. Clark, Hughes Aircraft Co., described
to the Section on January 9 the Hughes "Mobot” ;
— a mobile, radio-controlled robot with sight,
touch, and hearing designed to perform tasks too
hazardous or difficult for man, such as handling
fissionable materials, fire fighting, deep ocean
exploration, bomb disarming, demolition, etc.
Medical Society of the District of Columbia |
Air France advertises a European tour, August j
8-September 1, for members of the Society, their |
families and friends, to coincide with the Inter-
national Congress on Mental Health in Paris.
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
22
Philosophical Society of Washington
The retiring president, Louis R. Maxwell, de-
livered an address on January 13, entitled “Mag-
netic Atoms Amongst Others.”
Society for Experimental Biology and Medi-
cine, District of Columbia Section
The December 1 program consisted of three
papers, as follows: Margaret Kelly, NIH, “Pro-
tective Action of AET Against Radiation and
Alkylating Agents”; Howard Reynolds, USD A,
“Effect of Carbohydrate on Growth and Utiliza-
tion of Nitrogen by Tetrahymena pyroformis”;
and Leo Wislicki, Georgetown University, “Ef-
fects of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents on Direct
Excitability of Striated Muscle.”
Society of American Bacteriologists, Wash-
ington Branch
The January meeting of the Branch included
papers by M. Rogosa, NIH, on “Nitrate Reduc-
tion and ‘Catalase’ Formation by Certain Lacto-
bacilli,” and R. A. Finkelstein, Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research, on “Non-Specific Resistance
Mechanisms in Embryonated Eggs.”
Society of American Foresters, Washington
Section
On January 26, at the Section meeting, Jerome
F. Seaman of the Forest Products Laboratory,
Madison, discussed “Realistic Outlook on New*
Forms of Wood Utilization.”
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Entries which do not include information as to
the nature of the program, exact time or location,
or other data are, in most instances, regular meet-
ings of the society in question. Except where our
correspondents have notified us to the contrary,
we assume that the date and location of such
meetings remain unchanged from month to month.
February 7 — Botanical Society of Washing-
ton
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:00 p.m.
February 8 — Geological Society of Wash-
ington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:00 p.m.
February 9 — American Society of Mechani-
cal Engineers, Washington Section
Jacob Rabinow, “Creative Design”; E. L.
Daman, “Supercharged Boilers for
Stationary and Marine Application.”
Pepco Auditorium, 10th and E S’ts., N.W., 8:00
p.m.
February 9 — Chemical Society of Washing-
ton
Joint meeting with Washington Junior
Academy of Sciences. John Turkevich,
Princeton University, “The World of
Fine Particles.”
Museum of Natural History Auditorium, Con-
stitution Ave. at 10th St., N.W., 8:15 p.m.
February 10 — Philosophical Society of
Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:15 p.m.
February 11 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Annual banquet.
Statler-Hilton Hotel.
February 13 — American Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
Stanley Smith, Institute for the Study of
Metals, University of Chicago, “His-
tory of the Science of Metals.”
AAUW Headquarters, 2410 Virginia Ave., N.W.
February 13 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Digital TV.
Museum of Natural History Auditorium, Consti-
tution Ave. at 10th St., N.W., 8:00 p.m.
February 14 — American Institute of Elec-
trical Engineers, Washington Section
Pepco Auditorium, 10th and E Sts., N.W., 8:00
p.m.
February 14 — American Society of Civil En-
gineers, National Capital Section
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:00 p.m.
February 15 — Insecticide Society of Wash-
ington
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
February 15 — Washington Society of Engi-
neers
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave,. N.W., 8:00 p.m.
FEBRUARY 16— WASHINGTON ACADEMY
OF SCIENCES
February 20 — Acoustical Society of Ameri-
ca, Washington Chapter
Gallaudet College, 8:00 p.m.
February 20 — Society of American Military
Engineers, Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W., 12:15 p.m.
February, 1961
23
February 21 — Anthropological Society of
Washington
Daniel E. Berlyne, Boston University,
“New Directions in Motivation Theory.”
Museum of Natural History, Room 43, Constitu-
tion Ave. at 10th St., N.W., 8:15 p.m.
February 22 — Geological Society of Wash-
ington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:00 p.m.
February 23 — American Society of Mechani-
cal Engineers, Washington Section
Pepco Auditorium, 10th and E Sts., N.W.. 8:00
p.m.
February 24 Philosophical Society of
Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 2170 Florida
Ave., N.W., 8:15 p.m.
February 28 — American Society of Civil En-
gineers, National Capital Section
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W., 12:00 noon.
February 28 — Society of American Bacteri-
ologists, Washington Branch
Sternberg Auditorium, Walter Reed Army Insti-
tute for Research. 8:00 p.m.
ACADEMY ACTIVITIES
DECEMBER BOARD MEETING
The following notes are for the timely informa-
tion of the membership; they are not the official
minutes of the meeting. Ed.
The Board of Managers held its 533rd meet-
ing on December 20, 1960 at NBS, with Presi-
dent Wood presiding.
The minutes of the 532nd meeting were ap-
proved with minor corrections.
The Board suspended the regular order of
business in order to accommodate Ralph Cole of
Melpar, a member of the Washington Board of
Trade, who discussed a projected movement for
establishment of a Greater Washington Scientific
Bureau under the auspices of the Board of Trade.
This bureau would expect “to fulfill a need in
the Greater Washington area of a better means
of cohesion of scientific industry, professional
societies, the universities, and the community
at large.” Its functions might include (a) im-
provement of graduate scientific education by
such means as establishing new professorships
for specialized subjects; (b) conduct of a monthly
self-supported publication to disseminate meet-
ing notices and other information of value to the
scientific and industrial community; (c) provision
of a central office for professional administration
of scientific societies, possibly with a phone serv-
ice and mailing and addressing functions, or pro-
vision of a meeting room; (d) assistance in pro-
moting such meetings as “Engineers, Scientists,
and Architects Day”; (e) enhancement of the
scientific atmosphere of the Greater Washington
area by publication of a brochure emphasizing the
scientific community and value of the institutions
to be found here.
Financial support for the first year was esti-
mated at $17,500, which would enable hiring a
full-time executive director and his secretary.
Up to $2,000 of this amount might be provided by
professional societies, the remainder by scientific
industry of the area. Mr. Cole emphasized that
“what is required from the scientific and pro-
fessional societies is a sincere expression of the
types of services that they believe would enhance
their operation stated in the order of the priority
with which they would like to see them estab-
lished.” He urged the establishment of an ad hoc
Academy committee to formulate a position in
the matter.
After considerable discussion, Dr. Wood ad-
vised Mr. Cole that the Board would consider the
matter further, in particular the idea of setting
up an ad hoc committee to define the special
services that the proposed Scientific Bureau
might provide. Further discussion was deferred
in favor of the regular order of business.
Dr. Wood announced the appointment of a
Committee on the National Zoo, with Carlton M.
Herman as chairman and Keith C. Johnson and
George W. Wharton as members.
Chairman Hall of the Membership Committee
presented for first reading the names of 22 candi-
dates for membership.
Chairman Mahan of the Awards Committee
distributed an extensive report, including a re-
sume of the responsibilities of the Committee, its
recommendations to succeeding committees, and
its nominations of individuals for scientific
achievement awards for 1960. (See also story on
award winners elsewhere in this issue.) The re-
port was accepted. The Board also agreed that
award winners, upon becoming members of the
Academy, should not be obliged to pay dues for
the remainder of the current year or for the
following year.
For the Policy and Planning Committee, Dr.
Sookne reported on plans to hold a dinner meet-
ing with the presidents and delegates of af-
filiated societies for the purpose of improving
Academy relations with the societies. It was ex-
pected to hold this dinner some time during
February.
Following the second reading of their names,
Dorothy Carroll and Alfred M. Pommer were
elected to membership in the Academy.
Treasurer Aslakson pointed out a discrepancy
in the treasurer’s reports for January 1 — June 21,
and January 1 — September 30, as summarized in
24
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
the November Journal (page 16, columns 1 and
2). In one case, the figures include Junior
Academy receipts and disbursements; in the
other case, they do not. Comparable totals, not
including the Junior Academy figures, are as
[ ollows:
January 1 — June 21: Receipts, $9,605; disburse-
ments, $8,850.
January 1-September 30: Receipts, $11,599; dis-
| bursements, $12,302.
Di. Schubert reported for the Science Educa-
tion Committee that a request had been made to
the National Science Foundation for a grant of
$40,000 to extend the science education projects
currently going forward; NSF has suggested
paring this to $27,000, and the matter is currently
under consideration.
In a discussion led by Chairman Hall of the
Membership Committee and Chairman Mahan of
the Awards Committee, it was agreed that run-
ners-up for science achievement awards could be
considered for Academy membership on the basis
of the background information developed by the
Awards Committee.
JOINT BOARD
ON SCIENCE EDUCATION
The Joint Board has now passed the half-way
point in its current series of conferences on the
teaching of science. Two conferences on teaching
general science have taken place — one each in
Virginia and the District of Columbia. In addi-
tion, area-wide conferences have been held on
the teaching of physics and the teaching of
chemistry.
Each conference follows a similar pattern.
After an opening address on a topic of general
interest in the subject-matter area of the con-
ference, the remainder of the day is devoted to
a general discussion of problems in science teach-
ing, with emphasis on ways in which scientists
of the area may be of assistance in improving
science education.
The remainding conferences have been sched-
uled as follows:
General Science Teaching — Prince Georges
County Area — University of Maryland — February
11 — John K. Taylor, moderator.
Mathematics Teaching — Area- wide Conference
— Mt. Vernon S'eminary — February 25 — Raymond
J. Seeger, moderator.
General Science Teaching — Montgomery County
Area — Landon School — March 11 — Raymond J.
Seeger, moderator.
Biology Teaching — Area-wide Conference — Na-
j tional Institutes of Health — April 8 — John K.
Taylor, moderator.
As in the preceding conferences, persons in-
vited include about 60 teachers from the sec-
ondary schools of the particular area, and 40
persons representing college teachers and sci-
entists from various research institutions. School
contact representatives are especially invited.
Luncheon is provided by the Joint Board from
the grant received from the National Science
Foundation.
While every effort is being made to invite
interested persons, it is inevitable that some who
are vitally interested in local school programs
may be overlooked. Members of the Academy
desiring to be invited should make it known to
John K. Taylor, director of science projects, at
the office of the Joint Board, 1530 P Street, N.W.,
Washington 5. Invitations will be extended as far
as possible within the attendance limitation of 100
persons.
The proceedings of these conferences, as well
as reports of other activities carried out under
the NSF grant, will be published in a final
report that will be sent to all participants. Others
desiring copies should request them from the
Joint Board. A limited number of copies of the
1959-60 report are still available upon request
THE BROWNSTONE TOWER
When it was an-
nounced that Hiro-
shima had been de-
stroyed by an Ameri-
can atomic bomb on
August 6, 1945, I was
working in my office
on the eighth floor of
the Brownstone Tow-
er. I was depressed
rather than elated by
this news because I
felt that in just a few
years the Washington
that I knew and loved might be obliterated in
the same way. As I expected, much progress has
been made in atomic weapons and their delivery,
and the destruction of Washington can prob-
ably be accomplished whenever our enemy is
willing to pay the price. Indeed, I am somewhat
astonished that I am still alive and working in
Washington more than 15 years after that first
explosion in Japan. Yet we continue to plan and
build for the future as if we were not vulnerable.
I am reminded of R. L. Stevenson’s flaunting of
death in “Aes Triplex.” Of people living on
active volcanoes he wrote, “There are serenades
and suppers and much gallantry among the
myrtles overhead; and meanwhile the foundation
shudders underfoot, the bowels of the mountain
growl, and at any moment living ruin may leap
February, 1961
25
sky-high into the moonlight, and tumble man
and his merry-making in the dust.” He implies
that there is something admirable about the
behavior of men who are so unafraid of death
that they do not bother to move away from the
volcano — or from probable targets of atomic
bombs.
I live in the center of a target and have been
just as fatalistic about it as the citizen who
doesn’t even know the name of the Office of Civil
and Defense Mobilization. I have chosen to ig-
nore the threat of atomic blasts and fallout and
of chemical and biological warfare. But when I
think of it, I don’t feel brave, but just selfish.
For it is selfish to say, “I have lived long enough*
my way of life is fall’n into the sear, the yellow
leaf; . . .” and it matters little whether I leave
it this year or next, by atomic violence or by
pathogenesis. It does matter to the future of
mankind whether fools like me try to survive
modern warfare. Certainly there should be some
reasonable compromise between ignoring the
problem of nonmilitary, or civil, defense and being
obsessed by it.
The foregoing thoughts were generated by my
recent attendance in line of duty (I would have
avoided it otherwise) at a meeting on improve-
ment of our defenses against insidious chemical
and biological agents that might be applied when-
ever it suits our enemy to attack us. Later I
read what must certainly be the most up-to-date
and authoritative book on the subject. It is
“Nonmilitary Defense; Chemical and Bio-
logical Defenses in Perspective,” the proceedings
of a symposium held in Cleveland at the April
1960 meeting of the American Chemical Society
(ACS). Priced at $2.00, it can be obtained from
the Special Issue Sales Department of ACS at
1155 16th Street N. W., Washington 6, D. C.
This 100-page paper-covered book ought to be
read by every scientist who has been ignoring
nonmilitary defense and feeling uneasy about it.
It is hard to believe, but true nevertheless, that
the Washington metropolitan area could be de-
populated by a chemical bomb or by a biological
bomb, just as well as by an atomic bomb; the
only difference would be that buildings and other-
facilities would remain intact after chemical or
biological attack. Back in 1945 in the Brownstone
Tower I was not aware of biological and chem-
ical warfare (BW-CW) as a major threat against
civilian populations; now I am, though many
scientists may still be unaware of the power of
BW and CW to kill and incapacitate.
By biological warfare I mean the planned
dissemination by an enemy of microorganisms
pathogenic to man or to his domestic animals or
crops with the intention of causing death or
disability of military personnel; or casualties,
food shortages, or governmental and economic
paralysis in the civilian population. Although
biological agents may be disseminated by conven-
tional military weapons in open warfare, they
are particularly suited for silent, insidious, sub-
versive application, the results of which may be
indistinguishable from those of a natural epi-
demic, epizootic, or epiphytotic. Man may be
infected by inhaling air containing viable micro-
organisims, by ingesting contaminated food or
beverages, or by being attacked by vectors of
diseases — all of which are subject to manipula-
tion by an enemy. Toxins produced by micro-
organisms are included in the biological arsenal.
By chemical warfare I mean the planned dis-
semination by an enemy of organic chemicals
toxic to man so as to cause death or various de-
grees and kinds of disabilities for various periods.
CW is a biological as well as a chemical subject,
because the target is man.
I think the people in this area should know
more about BW-CW than they do. They should
know what might be used against them, how
it might be applied, how they might be affected,
and how they may protect themselves. The
scientists of the area should take the lead in
informing their fellow-citizens of these lethal
applications of science and of the beneficent by-
products of research on the development of bio-
logical and chemical weapons. Many disciplines
pure and applied are involved. Surely no organi-
zation in this area is more appropriate than the
Washington Academy of Sciences for taking the
lead in the missionary work that needs to be
done. I recommend that a Committee on Non-
military Defense be set up in the Academy to
keep in touch with developments in the light
of the special needs of our community and to
suggest what should be done for our protection.
Through the educational program of the Joint
Board the story can be brought to our secondary
school students, who may in turn take it to their
parents. I had previously signed up to talk
upon request on “the flowers that bloom in the
spring” — on trees. I shall do so, but I also want
to preach on nonmilitary defense to any audience
that will listen.
— Frank L. Campbell
SCIENCE ANI) DEVELOPMENT
A newly-established high-speed weather
facsimile network is being used by the
Weather Bureau to transmit weather analyses
and forecast maps. The new network is cap-
able of transmitting weather maps twice as fast as
the circuit formerly used. The upper air charts
are prepared with the aid of the Bureau’s elec-
tronic computer and drawn by a new electronic
weather plotter. More than 100 weather maps
are sent over the network every 24 hours to
26
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
about 650 government, military, and commercial
receiving stations in 330 cities of the United
States and southern Canada.
The University of Maryland has received
a license from the Atomic Energy Commis-
sion to operate a 10-kilowatt, pool-type re-
actor. It will be constructed on the campus at
College Park and will be used for student train-
ing and research.
A modern $12,212,800 building for the
Food and Drug Administration in Washing-
ton is scheduled to be completed in March
1963. The six-story building, with basement and
sub-basement, will provide 300,000 square feet
of assignable space and will provide, for the first
time, a consolidated headquarters and laboratory
for most of the operations in the Washington
area. At the present time some Bureaus have units
in as many as three different locations, separated
by distances of one block to three miles. The new
building will be located across Third Street from
the HEW buildings and connected with them
by a tunnel.
The land surface in part of the Santa
Clara Valley, California, has subsided as
much as 9 feet since 1912, according to a
report by the Geological Survey. The area is
about 13 miles wide and extends about 25
miles, from Redwood City to southern San Jose.
The subsidence is attributed to a lowering in
artesian pressure caused by pumping from wells.
The rate of subsidence averages about a foot
for each 13 feet decline in pressure.
Oil-in-water paints for outside use have
been developed by USDA chemists. The lin-
seed oil-in-water emulsion paints can be diluted
with water, but they resist water within 15 min-
utes after application and are sufficiently dry
after 30 minutes to permit application of another
coat. The paints adhere well to chalking sur-
faces, cover well, pour and flow easily, and do
not readily form lap marks. Some of the experi-
mental paints containing zinc oxide remained
stable on the shelf more than 46 weeks. In-
stability of emulsion paints containing zinc oxide
has limited their use in the past. Development
of new emulsifiers from linseed oil fatty acids has
overcome this difficulty.
A weapon that preceded by centuries the
bow and arrow in the New World is still in
use. A coot-hunting trip on Lake Patzcuaro
in western Mexico, in which the only weapon
used was the spear thrower — the Aztec atlatl — is
described in a recent Smithsonian report by
Matthew W. Stirling, retired director of the
Bureau of American Ethnology. Use of the atlatl
long before the first Europeans reached the New
World presumably was general over most of the
two American continents, Dr. Stirling says.
Relatively speaking, the bow was a late invention.
By the time of the first white settlers, however,
its use was confined largely to the highly cultured
Maya of Central America and the Incas of Peru.
Presumably this was due in large part to the
fact that hunting, for which the bow was more
effective, played a relatively small part in the
economy of these highly cultured and essentially
horticultural people. For this purpose there was
no incentive to change weapons.
An insect attractant that occurs naturally
in the female gypsy moth has been syn-
thesized by Martin Jacobson and fellow
workers in the U.S. Department of Agricul-
ture. They have also synthesized a related
chemical that is equal to the natural lure as an
attractant and can be produced cheaply in large
quantities. The attractant is used to bait traps
used in surveys to determine the location and
extent of gypsy moth infestations and to check
the effectiveness of chemical sprays. Collecting
the insects and preparing the natural attractant
was very expensive and time consuming. At times
it has been necessary to depend on imports from
Europe.
A conferendrum of nuclear education
programs in the United States has been pub-
lished by the Oak Ridge Institute of Nu-
clear Studies. The 76-page brochure lists 175
schools offering instructions in nuclear fields.
It details the degrees, courses and facilities at
each university and notes the availability of
fellowships or assistantships. Institutions are
listed with plasma and thermonuclear research
facilities, particle accelerators, and gamma radia-
tion facilities. Existing or planned university
reactor installations are indicated according to
type.
EDITORIAL COMMENT—
It is with considerable regret that we an-
nounce the resignation of Ileen E. Stewart as
managing editor of the Journal. Drawing upon
her extensive professional experience, Mrs.
Stewart designed the 1960 Journal, found a suit
able printer, developed many of the regular fea-
tures that have appeared in each issue, served
as a focal point for the rest of the staff, and
spent countless hours each month in copy editing
and putting the magazine together. We deeply
appreciate her efforts.
John Taylor’s feature story on the Academy’s
annual dinner and award presentations was pre-
pared before the snowstorm of January 19 and
I he incredible traffic snarl that resulted. President
Wood reports that the meeting did go forward,
substantially as scheduled, although two of the
awards had to be conferred in absentia. About
40 indomitable souls were present, out of an
anticipated attendance of a hundred. The rest,
like us, presumably were sitting it out in icy
streets, or trudging homeward through the drifts.
February, 1961
27
Vice-Presidents of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Representing the Affiliated Societies
Acoustical Society of America
Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences
Anthropological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Biological Society of Washington
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
Botanical Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
American Society of Civil Engineers
International Assn, for Dental Research
American Inst, of Electrical Engineers
Washington Society of Engineers
Entomological Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Helminthological Society of Washington
Columbia Historical Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Amer. Society of Mechanical Engineers
Medical Society of the Dist. of Columbia
American Society for Metals
American Meteorological Society
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Nuclear Society, Washington Section
Philosophical Society of Washington
Society of American Military Engineers
Richard Cook
Not Named.
Regina Flannery
Mary Louise Robbins
Herbert Friedman
Kathryn Knowlton
Herbert C. Hanson
William J. Bailey
Not Named.
Gerhard Brauer
Robert D. Elbourn
Howard S. Rappleye
Harold H. Shepard
Not Named.
Alexander Wetmore
Carle Dane
Carlton M. Herman
U. S. Grant, III
Joseph Yuill
William G. Allen
Fred O. Coe
John A. Bennett
Morris Tepper
Robert Huntoon
Urner Liddel
Louis R. Maxwell
Not Named.
Chairmen of Committees
Lawrence A. Wood, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Robert D. Stiehler, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Wayne C. Hall, Naval Research Laboratory
Dean B. Cowie, Dept, of Terrestrial Magnetism
Archie I. Mahan, Applied Physics Laboratory
B. D. van Evera, George W ashington University
A. T. McPherson, Nat. Bureau of Standards
Leo Schubert, American University
Raymond J. Seeger, Nat. Science Foundation
Special Committees
By Laws
Library of Congress
Repres. on AAAS Council
Standing Committees
Executive
Meetings
Membership
Monographs
Awards for Scientific Achievement
Grants-in-Aid for Research
Policy and Planning
Encouragement of Science Talent
Science Education
Harold H. Shepard, Dept, of Agriculture
John A. O’Keefe, Nat. Aeronautics & Space Admin ,
Howard A. Meyerhoff, Scientific Manpower Commission
Volume 51
FEBRUARY 1961
No. 2
CONTENTS
Page
The Academy in the Sixties 9
Academy Presents Awards to Six 11
Plant Disease Control Without Chemicals 13
FEBRUARY MEETING 17
Annual Report of Treasurer 18
Annual Report of Secretary 19
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 29
Affiliated Societies : 21
Calendar of Events 23
Academy Activities 24
Joint Board 25
The Browns tone Tower * 25
Science and Development 26
Editorial Comment 27
Washington Academy of Sciences 2nd Class Postage
1530 _ P St., N.W. Paid at
Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
t » d H a n- y Of A H ti o L Q
A * b 0 H £ 1 U V
22 divinity a v £
J
WAS
>7 /
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
received
Vol. 51 • No. 3
MARCH 1961
ar i 4 1961
i
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of
Sciences
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Lloyd N. Ferguson, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USD A, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
A Message from the Incoming President —
The Academy’s Program for 1961
Philip H. Abelson
Geophysical Laboratory
Metropolitan Washington is potentially
one of the great scientific centers of the
world. Our colleagues participate in crea-
tive research and in administrative deci-
Isions which have impact throughout this
nation and the globe. The huge Govern-
ment laboratories, together with increasing
non-governmental activity, provide employ-
ment for perhaps 20,000 scientists here.
This is of the same order of magnitude
as in the Boston and New York areas.
Unfortunately, the Washington scientific
community is only moderately effective in
cooperative efforts having major impact.
| Our performance, when judged in the light
of Boston or New York, is relatively weak.
The American Academy of Arts and
Sciences with its Daedelus has sowed seeds
which are now coming to fruition in affect-
ing national policy on disarmament, and
had a significant role in the appointment
of Dr. Wiesner as the President’s Science
Adviser. The New York Academy has long
sponsored imaginative symposia which have
foreshadowed major developments in new
j areas of science.
The Washington Academy of Sciences is
one of the few organizations which can
speak for science in Washington and can
take action for the whole community. It
has made notable contributions in the past,
and has been particularly successful in
| recent years in the encouragement of young
1 science talent through such activities as
the Junior Academy of Sciences. This is
t an activity which should continue.
However, an even greater effort needs to
he focused on the revitalization of the
1 ! senior Academy. One area which needs
thought and effort is the fostering of fel-
lowship among the members of our com-
munity. 1 have often noted an important
contrast between Boston and Washington.
March, 1961
The members of the northern city have far
more intensive intellectual and social con-
tacts than do we here. They are far more
aware of the resources of the community,
and far better informed as to the qualities
of their colleagues. As a result they are
able to support each other effectively in
various ventures. When important positions
become available in Washington or else-
where in the nation, they are able with clear
conscience to recommend one of their col-
leagues.
An analysis of the successes and failures
of other communities would doubtless be
valuable, and will be undertaken. However,
we shall not dwell on it further here, but
will indicate some of the things we have
already decided to do during this year.
One of the steps which will be taken is a
determined drive to increase our member-
ship, particularly among younger men who
are active in the affairs of the affiliated
societies. A more vital group would have
increased potential for constructive proj-
ects.
A second effort will be to increase the
quality and number of our inter-disciplin-
ary meetings. These are one of our best
ways of bringing together in friendly con-
tact the creative minds of our community.
A third action will be to give all possible
support to building up the journal of the
Washington Academy of Sciences. We are
fortunate in having an excellent editor,
and he merits every financial and other
cooperation.
In these undertakings I shall have the
benefit of much advice and assistance from
chairmen and members of various com-
mittees. The tasks, however, are large, and
we shall appreciate and welcome sugges-
tions and offers of help from everyone.
29
Unorthodox^ in Science*
Lawrence A. Wood
National Bureau of Standards
I. Introduction
The scope and magnitude of modern
science are truly tremendous. We all know
of the years required for an individual to
assimilate what is called the generally
accepted scientific knowledge in even a
very strictly limited field. Not often is con-
sideration given to the question of what
we mean by the glib phrase “generally
accepted” or how a given concept attains
that exalted state.1 It is certainly very
interesting and perhaps instructive to
examine a number of cases in which the
concepts have run counter to the generally
accepted scientific principles of their time.
In other words, I invite your attention to
unorthodoxy in science.
II. The Acceptance of Scientific
Ideas
At first sight, the term orthodox seems
out of place in a scientific connotation.
After all, we pride ourselves on eliminating
subjective influences in science, and it
should make no difference whether or not
we hold the “right opinion” — the literal
meaning of orthodoxy.
However, the actual history of the ac-
ceptance of a scientific concept is con-
ditioned throughout by the fact that scien-
tists are human beings subject to errors,
emotions, beliefs, and pride.
I. Bernard Cohen, professor of the his-
tory of science at Harvard, has said:2 “Any
suggestion that scientists so dearly love
truth that they have not the slightest hesi-
tation in jettisoning their beliefs is a mean
perversion of the facts.” If this is true, we
may well ask the question: “Who is to de-
termine the generally-accepted position in
* Address of the retiring president at the 455th
meeting of the Washington Academy of Sciences,
February 16. 1961.
scientific matters?” In actual practice in
recent times, it is the program committees,
the journal editors and reviewers, and the
textbook writers. They are forced by con-
siderations of space to determine whether
it is permissible to devote space to a given
doubtful concept.
III. Examples of Unorthodoxv in
Science
Let us examine twelve instances of in-
dividuals who propounded ideas that were
regarded as distinctly unorthodox at the
time they were proposed.
1. Copernicus. — The first unorthodox
idea I shall mention was that of the helio-
centric universe propounded by Copernicus
about 1530. It was distinctly at variance
with the geocentric universe of Aristotle,
which had dominated men’s thinking for
over 1800 years. It became quantitative
with the careful astronomical observations
of Tycho and Keppler. Thus it gained
general acceptance in about 100 years.
2. Galileo. — Galileo in about 1590 also
ventured to contradict the authority of
Aristotle by denying that a heavy body
necessarily falls faster than a light one.
The famous direct observation of falling
balls from the Tower of Pisa apparently
led to acceptance of this unorthodox idea
fairly quickly and established the modern
principle of verification by experiment.
3. Young.- — Thomas Young in 1801 pre-
sented evidence for the wave theory of
light. He found it difficult to obtain a
hearing because Sir Isaac Newton was cited
as favoring the corpuscular theory. Experi-
mental evidence of interference by Fresnel
and polarization effects established the wave
theory quite firmly.
4. Mayer , Joule, and Helmholtz. — The
30
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
tremendously important theory of the con-
servation of energy, so fundamental to
modern physics, also found acceptance only
with difficulty. The theory was first put
forth by R. J. Mayer, who in 1842 pub-
lished an article proposing the equivalence
of heat and mechanical energy and calcu-
lating a numerical value of the equivalence
factor from observed specific heats. No
particular attention was given to this paper
until 1847, when J. P. Joule and H. Helm-
holz independently presented papers with
the same conclusion. Helmholtz’ paper, pre-
sented before the Physical Society of Ber-
lin, was rejected by the editors of Annalen
der Physik and later published in pamphlet
form. However, the theory, once under-
stood, gained rather rapid acceptance and
has only rarely been questioned since 1850.
5. Pasteur. — In the biological sciences
one can point out that the germ theory
of Louis Pasteur found strong opposition
from the medical profession of his day,
which adhered to “spontaneous genera-
tion” and other vague ideas. Pasteur calm-
ly performed critical experiments of many
kinds and gradually established his point.
6. Planck. — At the beginning of the
current century, Max Planck was consider-
ing the distribution of energy radiated by
a perfect emitter (“black body”) at various
temperatures. In order to obtain agreement
with the observed energy distribution, he
was forced to make the assumption that
the energy of small oscillators could take
on only discrete values 0, Av, 2 Av, 3
Av, etc., where v is the frequency of the
radiation and A a constant. This assump-
tion was completely at variance with classi-
cal mechanics, which gives no basis for
i such a limitation. Naturally it did not re-
| ceive ready acceptance. However, Ein-
j stein’s explanation of photoelectric emis-
sion in 1905, Bohr’s quantum theory of
I atomic structure with its explanation of the
wavelengths of spectral lines in 1913, and
finally the experimental evidence of the
Compton effect of change of wavelength of
! radiation on scattering in 1923, provided
the bases for full acceptance of the theory.
7. Blondlot. — In 1903, at a time when
scientists were just becoming familiar with
a-rays, /?-rays, y-rays, and X-rays, a dis-
tinguished French professor, R. Blondlot
at the University of Nancy, announced the
discovery of N-rays ;}>4. These were said
to have remarkable properties, and over
200 papers were published relating to them.
They were reported to be emitted by metals,
rubber, and many other materials, although
never by wood. Some authors reported that
they could be refracted and diffracted, and
would penetrate black paper, wood, and
aluminum.
R. W. Wood, professor at Johns Hopkins
University, arranged to visit Blondlot in
his laboratory at Nancy in 1904. He found
that Blondlot was still observing a spectrum
of N-rays after Wood had surreptitiously
removed the prism refracting them 4. This
observation, duly reported in German,
British, and American scientific journals,
dealt a death-blow to N-rays.
8. Ehrenhajt. — The accurate measure-
ment y of the charge on the electron was
one of the most important tasks in physics
in the years preceding 1920. An unorthodox
position in this field was taken by F.
Ehrenhaft of Vienna, who reported meas-
urements on metal particles allegedly bear-
ing charges less than that of a single elec-
tron. This “sub-electron” was the subject
of controversy for several years, but the
careful measurements of R. A. Millikan
on oil drops were finally accepted as more
reliable.
9. Klingelfuss. — A series of unorthodox
papers by F. Klingelfuss of Basel (5 were
published in 1929 and 1930 in Zeitschrift
fiir Physik. From experimental results on
the minimum, potential required for a spark
in air, equations were derived involving
various atomic constants. By manipulation
of the equations, new fallacious relations
were obtained which did not involve the
results of the measurements of sparking
potentials. From the new equations, values
of the atomic constants were calculated to
as many as seven significant figures.
10. Rupp. — E. Rupp, one of the pioneers
March, 1961
31
in German research on electron diffraction,
published a series of papers in 1934 on the
polarization of electron beams, artificially-
produced positrons, and related topics.
When no other workers could reproduce
the results reported, Rupp withdrew the
papers after undergoing a psychiatric ex-
amination.7
11. Rhine. — Among unorthodox con-
cepts in psychology, one can scarcely fail
to mention the para-psychology and extra-
sensory perception experiments conducted
over the past 30 years by Joseph B. Rhine
and his associates at Duke University.8 The
results of experiments with the naming of
unseen cards as they are dealt from a deck
are reported to contain far more success-
ful calls than could be expected on the
basis of pure chance. The orthodox opinion
at present appears to be that the effects are
the result of too loose a system of labora-
tory controls, including the selection of
favorable data and even unconscious erro-
neous recording by workers with a strong
belief in extra-sensory perception.
12. Allison. — The final example of un-
orthodoxy which I shall discuss is the
magneto-optic method 9 of chemical analy-
sis proposed in 1930 by Fred Allison of
Alabama Polytechnic Institute. Minima of
light intensity were observed visually as a
slider was moved along a set of parallel
wires. The minima were said to be cor-
related with the chemical elements present.
The method never gained general accept-
ance, since observers in other laboratories
for the most part were either unable to
obtain the minima or unable to correlate
them with the elements in solution.
IV. Requirements for Acceptance
This survey of examples of unorthodoxy,
I hope, has been of some interest and
amusement. If it is to be instructive as
well, we should examine critically the
characteristics of those that have gained
acceptance, in order to see whether they
possess any common characteristics differ-
ing from those of the examples that have
failed.
Experimental results must be reproduc-
ible without question in other laboratories
and by other completely independent ob-
servers. In the examples given, the results
of Galileo, Pasteur, and Millikan are now
routinely repeated in university laboratory
courses for instructional purposes. Failure
in this respect was the most striking defect
of the work of Blondlot, Ehrenhaft, Rupp,
Rhine, and Allison.
All of the experimental results obtained
under given conditions must be retained.
The discarding of certain results without
adequate independent cause gives the data
a statistical bias which is seldom sufficiently
appreciated.
Experimental results without any reason-
able theory or explanation of mechanism
may be quite valid, but one should be
suspicious of such work. This lack was
evident in the work of Blondlot, Ehrenhaft,
Rhine, and Allison.
Where the work has been primarily the
development of a theory, it must be con-
sistent with all the known experimental
facts. This may be called the requirement
of absolute intellectual honesty. Coperni-
cus, Galileo, Young, Pasteur, and Planck
disregarded none of the available experi-
mental information in formulating their
theories.
In conclusion, I think that we should
be prepared to scrutinize carefully new 1
ideas and results with particular attention
to the factors just mentioned. With the ,
elimination of the unacceptable instances, I
we may well expect the accomplishment |
of significant scientific advances by those
individuals who are willing to display un- i
orthodoxy in science.
V. References
1 Boring, E. G., Validation of scientific beliefs. I
Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 96, 535 (1952).
2 Cohen, I.B.. Orthodoxy and scientific prog- I
ress, Ibid. 96, 505 (1952).
3 Stradling, G. F., Resume of the literature of I
the N-rays, the Ni rays, and the heavy emission. J
J. Franklin Inst. 164, 57, 113, and 177 (1907).
4 Seabrook, William, Doctor Wood. Harcourt, j
Brace & Co., New York 1941, p. 234.
32
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 1
5 Millikan, R. A., The Electron. University of
Chicago Press, Chicago (1924).
c Klingelfuss, F. Z. Physik 52, 126, 746, and
890 (1929) ; 53, 154 (1929) ; 62, 569 (1930).
7 Rupp, E. Ibid. 95, 801 (1935).
s Gardner, Martin, Fads and Fallacies in the
Name of Science. Dover Publications Inc., New
York, 1957, p. 299.
9 Cooper, S. S., and Ball, T. R., The magneto-
optic method of chemical analysis. J. Chem.
Ed. 13, 210, 278, and 326 (1936).
General
Hering, Daniel W., Foibles and Fallacies of
Science. D. van Nostrand, New York, 1924.
Jastrow, Joseph, Ed., The Story of Human
Error. D. Appleton-Century Co., New York,
1936.
Gardner, Martin, Fads and Fallacies in the
Name of Science. Dover Publications, Inc., New
York, 1957.
Richtmyer, F. K., and Kennard, E. H., Intro-
duction to Modern Physics. McGraw-Hill Book
Co., Inc., New' York, 1942.
Academy Seeks Closer Ties
With Affiliated Societies
A dinner meeting was held on February
1, to explore means of developing closer
relations between the Academy and its
affiliated societies. Called by Archibald T.
McPherson, 1960 chairman of the Policy
and Planning Committee, the meeting was
attended by some 17 representatives of the
societies. Also present were WAS President
Abelson and President-elect Van Evera, as
well as Waldo Schmidt, Arnold Sookne,
and Bourdon F. Scribner, members of the
Policy and Planning Committee.
Four specific proposals for cooperative
action were considered:
Preparation of a Joint Directory. — Re-
sponse on the whole was favorable. While
some representatives expressed disinterest,
the majority favored a joint publication
ranging from a listing of officers and func-
tionaries to a directory of the entire mem-
bership.
Establishment of Headquarters. — The re-
sponse to this proposal was varied. The
smaller societies generally felt they had
no need for a central office, but some would
like to have mailing facilities provided. A
general need was expressed for storage
space for files.
Increasing Academy Membership. — As
a group, the representatives felt that mem-
bership committees have not been suffi-
ciently aggressive. It was suggested that
the problem of recruitment is connected
with that of increasing the prestige of the
Academy. More publicity, particularly for
the Academy’s work with young people,
and improved public relations are required,
according to some representatives.
Promotion of Interdisciplinary Discus-
sions and Meetings. — The representatives
favored panel discussions on problems of
national importance and involving several
scientific disciplines, seminars of the type
held by the New York Academy of Sciences,
and the establishment of a list of speakers
and subjects to assist affiliated societies in
organizing interdisciplinary meetings.
The Policy and Planning Committee
would welcome comments from the mem-
bership of the Academy on these specific
proposals, as well as on other avenues of
cooperation between the Academy and its
affiliated societies.
March. 1961
33
WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
ORGANIZATION FOR 1961
Officers
Standing Committees
Executive Committee
Philip H. Abelson (Chairman) Geophysical Laboratory
Heinz Specht National Institutes of Health
Benjamin D. Van Evera George Washington University
Norman F. Braaten Coast and Geodetic Survey
John L. Torcesen National Bureau of Standards
Meetings Committee
Francois N. Frenkiel (Chairman)
Bourdon F. Scribner
DeWitt Stetten, Jr.
Mary L. Robbins
Frank T. McClure
Paul H. Oeiiser
Alfred E. Brown
Membership Committee
Mary L. Robbins (Chairman) George Washington University Hospital
(Roster not complete.)
Committee on Monographs *
Dean B. Cowie (Chairman) Department of Terrestrial Magnetism
* A one-man committee in 1961.
Committee on Awards for Scientific Achievement
(Chairman and committee members not yet appointed.)
David Taylor Model Basin
National Bureau of Standards
National Institutes of Health
George Washington University Hospital
Applied Physics Laboratory
Smithsonian Institution
Harris Research Laboratories
34
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Committee on Grants-in-Aid for Research *
Archibald T. McPherson (Chairman) National Bureau of Standards
* A one-man committee in 1961.
Committee on Policy and Planning
Term
through
1963 Frank L. Campbell (Chairman)
1961 Waldo Schmitt
1961 Paul D. F oote
1962 Archibald T. McPherson
1962 Arnold M. Sookne
1963 Wayne C. Hall
National Research Council
National Museum
National Bureau of Standards
National Bureau of Standards
Harris Research Laboratories
Naval Research Laboratory
Committee on Encouragement of Science Talent
Term
through
1962 Abner Brenner (Chairman) National Bureau of Standards
1961 William T. Read
1961 Howard B. Owens Northwestern High School
(Science Supervisor, Prince Georges County)
1962 Roy J. Barker Department of Agriculture
1963 Lloyd N. Ferguson Howard University
1963 Alfred Weissler National Institutes of Health
Committee on Science Education *
Term
through
June 30
1961 Raymond J. Seeger (Chairman) National Science Foundation
1961 Robert B. Hobbs National Bureau of Standards
1962 John K. Taylor National Bureau of Standards
1962 Howard A. Meyerhoff Scientific Manpower Commission
1963 Leo Schubert American University
1963 Herman Branson Howard University
* The Committee constitutes half of the Joint Board on Science Education.
Special Committees
Committee on the National Zoo
Carlton M. Herman (Chairman)
Keith C. J ohnson
George W. Wharton
Patuxent Refuge, Laurel, Md.
Science Supervisor, D. C. Public Schools
University of Maryland
Editor
Associate Editors
Staff Assistant
The Journal
Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr.
Frank L. Campbell
Harold T. Cook
Russell B. Stevens
John K. Taylor
Richard P. Farrow
( For delegates of affiliated societies.
Department of Agriculture
National Research Council
Department of Agriculture
George Washington University
National Bureau of Standards
National Canners Association
see page 48)
March, 1961
35
MARCH MEETING
(456th Meeting of the Washington Academy of Sciences,
Honoring the Washington Junior Academy of Sciences)
SUBJECT
Recent Significant Advances in Science
SPEAKERS
Biology: Christian B. Anfinsen, Jr., National Institutes of Health
Physics: Joseph Weber, University of Maryland
DATE
Thursday, March 16, 1961, 8:15 p.m.
PLACE
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, Cosmos Club, 2170 Florida Ave., N.W.
Christian B. Anfinsen,
Jr., was born in Monessen,
Pa. He received the A.B.
degree from Swarthmore
College in 1937, the M.S.
degree from the Univer-
sity of Pennsylvania in
1939, and the Ph.D. degree
in biochemistry from Har-
vard University in 1943.
For most of the next seven
years he served on the faculty of Harvard Medical
School, as instructor or professor of biochemistry.
In 1950, Dr. Anfinsen joined the National Heart
Institute, NIH, as head of the group now known
as the Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and
Metabolism. His research studies have been par-
ticularly concerned with the synthesis and struc-
ture of proteins.
gjfe, I and served as a naval
officer until 1948 — first on
llBl A University' of Maryland in
1948, as professor of electrical engineering. In
1951 he received the Ph.D. degree in physics
from Catholic University. During 1955-56, Dr.
Weber was a Guggenheim fellow at the Institute
for Advanced Study, Princeton, and at the Uni-
versity of Leiden. He is currently professor of
physics and electrical engineering at the Uni-
versity of Maryland.
PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF MERIT
At the general meeting. Academy President Philip H. Abelson will present certificates of merit to
21 high school students of the Metropolitan Area, for their achievements as winners or runners-up
in the 1960 National Science Talent Search. These students are:
Thomas G. Andrews, Jr. (Bladensburg) , Robert C. Bast, Jr. (Washington-Lee) , Martha A. Burns
(Immaculata) , John M. Cone, Jr. (F. C. Hammond), Leland G. Dobbs (Sidwell Friends), Michael
J. Finegan (Fairfax), Dennis W. Herrin (Ancostia), Edward C. Jones (Wakefield), Steven L.
Jordan (Montgomery Blair), Margaret E. Kottke (Bladensburg), David H. Malin (Walter John
son), Rosalie A. McCanner (Woodrow Wilson), David C. Mendelson (Western), Margaret A. Neisen
(Richard Montgomery), Michael C. Newlon (Western), Andrew R. Phelps (Sidwell Friends), Mary
M. Shaw (Walter Johnson), Thomas M. Souders (McLean), Barry L. Sperling (McLean), Henry L.
Vacher (Western), Robert L. Waymost (Bethesda-CC) .
Prior to the general meeting, the students and their science teachers will be guests at a dinner
sponsored by the Committee on Encouragement of Science Talent, to be held at the Fairfax Hotel,
2100 Massachusetts Ave., at 6:30 p.m. All members of the Academy who are interested in en-
couraging science talent are invited to attend.
36
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical com-
mittees, civic activities, and marriages , births, and
other family news. Formal contributors have been
assigned for the systematic collection of news at
institutions employing considerable numbers of
Academy members (see list on masthead) . How-
ever, for the bulk of the membership, we must
rely on individuals to send us news concerning
themselves and their friends. Contributions may
be addressed to Harold T . Cook, Associate Editor,
care of Agricultural Marketing Service, U. S.
Department of Agriculture, Rm. 3917 South Bldg.,
Washington 25, D. C.
APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY
Ralph E. Gibson, director of the Applied
Physics Laboratory, was general chairman of the
14th Annual Conference on the Administration
of Research at Ann Arbor, September 18-21,
1960. Dr. Gibson also spoke on September 13 at
Williamsburg, Va., at the Brookings Institution
I Conference for Federal Science Executives; his
| topic was “Science, Technology and Economic
Growth.”
Albert M. Stone, technical assistant to the
director, also attended the 14th Annual Confer-
I ence on the Administration of Research.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Alfred M. Pommer attended conferences on
I radioactive waste disposal in Denver, January
9-H.
NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
George T. Rado, head of the Magnetism
Branch, presented an invited reportorial talk at
the Sixth Conference on Magnetism and Magnetic
I Materials, November 14-17, 1960, in New York
City. His lecture provided an integrated summary
of 16 experimental and theoretical papers on
I ferromagnetic resonance, and constituted the first
use of the reportorial system at these Conferences.
| Under this system, a single talk replaces individ-
ual presentations of several papers.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
Arnold M. Bass is on a research assignment
; in London under the NBS training program. He
is working with W. R. S’. Gaston in the Physics
| Department, Imperial College of Science and
j Technology, University of London. Dr. Bass is
expected to return in July.
USDA, BELTSVILLE
Flippo Gravatt, while on a vacation in Puerto
Rico recently, conferred with university and other
authorities on the preservation of “Bahia Fosfore-
scente,” a world-famous bay displaying lumines-
cence every night of the year. Mr. Gravatt is the
Maryland and District of Columbia representa-
tive of Nature Conservancy, a national organiza-
tion. This organization has purchased the famous
“Battle Creek Cypress Swamp” and a hemlock
forest in southern Maryland and a part of the
Crainesville tamarack swamp west of Oakland,
Md. Suggestions about other natural areas needing
preservation will be appreciated.
James E. MeMurtrey, Jr., was awarded a cer-
tificate in recognition of his accomplishments and
contributions to the promotion of tobacco re-
search at the 17th Tobacco Workers Conference
on January 17. He has been associated with these
conferences for 45 years. Mr. MeMurtrey was
one of ten oustanding scientists to be elected to
an honorary lifetime membership in the Soil and
Crop Science Society of Florida, at its 20th an-
nual meeting on November 29, 1960.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Agricultural Re-
search Service, spent November and part of De-
cember in India, as a member of a team which
negotiated grants for agricultural research with
scientific institutions, under the provisions of
U. S. Public Law 480 (83rd Congress) . His travels
took him to New Delhi, Bombay, Madras, Banga-
lore, Mysore, Poona, Allahabad, and other cities.
On leaving India, Mr. Detwiler visited institu-
tions in Karachi, Pakistan, and the Rome office
of the ARS’ foreign grants program.
Kenneth W. Parker presented an invited
paper, “What’s Ahead in Range Research?” at
the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Society
of Range Management, held at Salt Lake City
January 31-February 3.
Benjamin Schwartz gave the fall-term bio-
logical lecture at the University of Illinois at
Urbana, December 1, 1960, on “The Evolution of
Knowledge Concerning Ascaris lumbricoides .” On
January 12, he gave an illustrated lecture at
USDA on “Trichinosis and Its Control — A Cen-
tury of Progress.”
For the past few months Dr. S'chwartz has
served as consultant parasitologist to the Meat
Inspection Division.
UNCLASSIFIED
Victor Hicks has been appointed staff scientist
of the Military Department of Remington Rand
Univac. He was formerly manager of the physics
laboratory of Allen Bradley Company. Dr. Hicks
holds the rank of rear admiral in the U. S. Naval
Reserve.
March, 1961
37
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
In a number of instances, information on the
specific program scheduled for meetings of affili-
ated societies is not available sufficiently in ad-
vance to be included in the Calendar of Events.
Where possible, therefore, this material will be
carried as a news event in the next issue of the
Journal in the commentary concerning the society
in question.
Acoustical Society of America, Washington
Chapter
On February 20, Alfred Weissler spoke to the
chapter on “Ultrasonic Cavitation as a Cause of
Chemical Change.”
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
Howard Mitchell, conductor of the National
Symphony, discussed on February 14 some of the
technical problems involved, from the artist’s
viewpoint, in the production of live and recorded
orchestral music.
The first Precision Measurement and Standards
Meeting, held February 21 in cooperation with
several related professional groups, presented J.
Cameron and A. G. McNish, of NBS, on “Propa-
gation of Error in a Chain of Standards.”
The Transportation, Industry, and Management
Division on February 13 heard Lowell H. Hattery,
American University, speak on “Computers and
Management.” A meeting scheduled for March
will consider “Basic Concepts of Sound System
Applications.”
In the Power Division, chairmen and secretaries
of the four technical groups concerned have been
selected. A general discussion was held on Jan-
uary 24 to consider future plans and programs.
Two technical discussions have been conducted
by the Science and Electronics Division — one on
“Thermoelectricity” by William Lucke of the
Naval Research Laboratory, and another in the
area of computers.
American Society of Civil Engineers, Na-
tional Capital Section
Robert Z. Page, Bureau of Yards and Docks,
pointed out in a talk on “Some Contributions of
Biological Sciences to Engineering” that activities
of various living organisms not infrequently com-
plicate and frustrate the efforts of the civil engi-
neers, and supported his thesis with two recently
prepared films. In addition, the recipient of the
student fall award, Michael A. Czachor of Catho-
lic University, gave a brief paper on " Hyperbolic
Paraboloids in Construction.”
Student chapter meetings were held at George-
town University on February 2 and at Howard
University on February 14 and 28.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
The jointly sponsored lecture on “Propaga-
tion of Error,” noted above, was originated by the
38
George Washington University Center for Meas-
urement Science, newly established in collabora-
tion with the Bureau of Standards and with
financial support from the Martin Company of
Baltimore. The Center serves to train personnel in
measurement techniques and to conduct research
on measurement problems, and as a service
organization. An Associates Program, comprising
individuals, governmental and non-governmental
agencies contributing support to the Center, pro-
vides the necessary linkage with industry and
other consumers.
The February 23 meeting included an address
by James Dickson, Allis Chalmers Company, on
“Ingredients Required in Building a Nuclear
Power Reactor.”
Current interest in science and engineering edu-
cation suggests that additional comment on Paul
F. Chenea’s December talk would be appropriate.
On this occasion he pointed out the need for a
curriculum that recognizes the trend to research
in industry, and that more and more engineering
problems cut across two or more of the tradi-
tional enginering specialties. Industry increasingly
regards very large expenditures for computers as
valid in replacing engineers themselves, particu-
larly when it means dramatic reductions in design
lead time. Publicity given to what he called
“scientific successes” and “engineering failures” is
steering certain students from engineering into
science, a movement heightened by changes in
the high school physics course itself. Dr. Chenea
felt that the professional content of the under-
graduate curriculum was under deep scrutiny,
that almost none of the modern instrumentation
was to be found at the undergraduate level, that
engineering education beyond the B.S. degree was
increasingly in demand, and that attention must
be given to upgrading of faculty competence.
Botanical Society of Washington
At its most recent meeting, the Society heard
Louis B. Baron. Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research, on “Sexual Behavior and Mechanisms
in Bacteria.” Dr. Baron was the recipient of this
year’s Academy award in the biological sciences.
Chemical Society of Washington
At a Board of Managers meeting on January
12, supplementing the meeting of January 10, two
new special committees were established: a com-
mittee on tellers, which would be active during
the nomination and election of officers, and a com-
mittee on long range planning, which would
comprise all councilors in the area including na-
tional Division councilors, and would serve in
an advisory capacity to the Board.
Future Board meetings will be held on special
call, rather than prior to general meetings of the
Society, as in the past. Each general meeting will,
however, be preceded by a dinner open to all
members.
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
The formation of topical groups within the
Society will be discussed at future Board meet-
ings.
At the Society’s general meeting on January
12, Allen L. Alexander, retiring president, spoke
on “Recent Research in Functional Organic Coat-
ings.” At the general meeting on February 9,
held jointly with the Washington Junior Academy
of Sciences, John Turkevich of Princeton Univer-
sity spoke on “The World of Fine Particles.”
Entomological Society of Washington
Roman Vishniac, of the Living Biology Film
Series, spoke at the January meeting and showed
motion pictures of insects and other animals in
their natural habitats.
In a related area, it might be noted that Colin
G. Butler of the Rothamsted Experimental Station,
England, visited the University of Maryland early
in January and lectured on “Interattraction among
Members of a Honeybee Community.” Dr. Butler,
who is in this country under the AIBS Foreign
Visitors Program, is well known for his discovery
of the so-called “queen substance.”
Geological Society of W ashington
Three papers were given at the January 25
meeting, as follows: John C. Goodlett, “Plant
Distribution and Pollen Analysis”; Thor H. Kiils-
gaard, “Ore Deposits of Southern Peru”; and
W. H. Bradley, “Geochemical Balances in the
Green River Formation of Wyoming.”
On February 8, R. E. Wallace, N. J. Silberling,
and D. B. Tatlock discussed “Some Structural
Features of the Humboldt Range, Nevada”; W.
T. Pecora spoke on “Origin of Carbonatites, Bear-
paw Mountains, Montana”; and L. C. Pakiser,
Jr., D. P. Hill, and H. L. Baldwin considered
“Gravity Anomalies in Volcanic Regions of the
Southern Cascade Range, the Shake River Plain,
and Yellowstone National Park.”
Helminthological Society of Washington
The 377th meeting was held jointly with the
Howard University Chapter of Sigma Xi on
February 17, at which time five members of the
Department of Zoology presented papers. Neville
K. Rajapaksa reported on the reproductive capa-
city of Argas persicus after starvation; and D. R.
Lincicome, Jacqueline A. Shepperson, E. H.
Francis, and Anna L. Cherrie gave data on vari-
ous aspects of T rypanosoma in experimental
animals.
Insecticide Soeiety of Washington
On February 15, Price G. Piquett, USDA, spoke
on “Chemical Inhibition of Gonadal Development
in Insects,” and Martin Jacobson, also of USDA,
on “What is Known about Juvenile Hormones.”
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
At the Section meeting on February 13, William
C. Coombs, National Bureau of Standards, showed
how, in “Digital Television,” a way is opened to
encoding techniques which are in line with
modern communications theory, and demonstrated
methods for achieving fidelity in the picture with-
out undue expansion of the band width. Non-
classified aspects of recent Government television
developments were made available.
Advance notice has appeared of the Second
National Symposium on Human Factors in Elec-
tronics, scheduled for May 4 and 5 at the Marriott-
Twin Bridges Motor Hotel in Arlington. This
Symposium is sponsored by the national Profes-
sional Group in this area of concern.
Professional Group Chapter activities include
programs on “TEM Diode Switching,” February
7 ; “The Psychology of S’elling Ideas to Manage-
ment,” January 30; and “The Determination of
the Thermocynamic and Electrodynamic Con-
stants of the Surface of the Moon,” February 21.
International Association for Dental Re-
search, Washington Section
On February 20, Meyer Rubin of the Geological
Survey addressed the Section on “C14 Dating and
the New Frontier,” and in so doing showed how
low-level counts have become increasingly difficult
as all materials become radioactively contamin-
ated, with comments on techniques developed to
overcome these difficulties. In another paper,
Comdr. G. H. Rovelstad, Naval Dental School,
spoke on “Salivary Corpuscles” — leucocytes re-
cently shown to be present in the oral cavity in
large numbers.
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Space limitations completely rule out its re-
production here, but Washington scientists should
be aware of the monthly publication, by the
Medical Society, of a Current Medical Events
leaflet. The February issue lists more than 40
events of medical interest, the great majority of
which are open to interested individuals without
restriction.
Philosophical Society of Washington
The 1503rd meeting of the Society, January 27,
presented R. V. Pound, of Harvard University, in
a paper on “Laboratory Measurements of the
Gravitational Red Shift.”
Society for Experimental Biology and Medi-
cine, District of Columbia Section
On February 2 a joint meeting was held with
the Md-Va-DC Chapter of the American Associa-
tion of Clinical Chemists. A series of four papers
was arranged: Robert Scow, NIH, “Fat Metabo-
lism in Experimental Diabetes”; Edward C.
Knoblock, Walter Reed, “Cholesterol and Lipo-
proteins Following Radiation Injury”; Abel M.
Domiguez, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology,
“Biochemical Approach to Determination of Ante-
mortem Hypoxia”; and James Field, NIH, “In
Vitro Stimulation of Glucose Oxidation in Thyroid
by Thyroid Stimulating Hormone.”
March, 1961
39
The Section, as have several affiliated societies,
reports approval by its members of a contribution
to the work of the Joint Board on Science Edu-
cation.
Society of American Military Engineers,
Washington Post
On February 20, the Post scheduled a talk by
Harry Lowe, Jr. on ‘‘Extra Terrestrial Construc-
tion.”
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Events which, so far as we can determine at the
time of writing, will take place subsequent to the
appearance of the Journal are noted below.
IF here possible, the nature of the program is
indicated ; in most instances the entry merely
notes the date and place of a regularly-scheduled
meeting of the organization in question. Last-
minute changes in time and place, or emergency
cancellations, may in certain instances alter the
situation.
March 6 — American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, Washington Section
Telemetry and Instrumentation Division (post-
poned from December) — Robert Hart, Barth Engi-
neering and Manufacturing Company, “Dynamic
Simulation of Telemetry Signals.”
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
March 7 — American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, Washington Section
Student Night meeting, originally scheduled for
March 14. Dinner meeting at Catholic University,
followed by a play staged by the Catholic Univer-
sity Speech and Drama Department.
March 7 — Botanical Society of Washington
Meets with staff members of the Smithsonian
for a presentation of the research program in plant
science at that institution.
March 8 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
Third Annual Banquet, Terrace Banquet Room,
Shoreham Hotel. Speaker will be John H. Rubel,
Office of the Secretary of Defense, “Rising Costs
of Research and Development.”
March 8 — Geological Society of Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
March 9 — Chemical Society of Washington
Annual Hillebrand Award dinner and lecture.
Guest of honor: Frank T. McClure, Applied
Physics Laboratory. Tickets: $3.50.
National Housing Center, 1625 L St., N.W.,
7 :30 p.m.
March 10 — Philosophical Society of W ash-
ington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
March 13 — American Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
Dwight Brown, Jones and Laughlin Steel Com-
pany, "Direct Reduction of Iron Ore.”
AAUW Headquarters, 2410 Virginia Ave., N.W.
March 14 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Microwave Theory and
Technology.
March 15 — American Society of Civil En-
gineers, National Capital Section
Annual Dinner, Shoreham Hotel. Cocktails,
6:00; dinner, 6:45; program, 8:00 p.m. National
President Glen Holcomb will present life mem-
berships to 12 members.
March 15 — Insecticide Society of W ashing-
ton
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
March 15 — Washington Society of Engineers
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
MARCH 16— WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF
SCIENCES
March 16 — Society of American Foresters,
Washington Section
YWCA, 6:30 p.m.
March 17 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Arthur G. Norris, Vitro Engineering, “The
Peaceful Do-existence of Engineers and Writers.”
U. S. National Museum, 8:00 p.m.
March 20 — Acoustical Society of America,
Washington Chapter
Gallaudet College, 8:00 p.m.
March 20 — Society of American Military En-
gineers, Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W., noon.
March 21 — Anthropological Society of Wash-
ington
Richard lessor. University of Colorado, “A
Social Learning Approach to Culture and Be-
havior.”
U. S. National Museum, Room 43, 8:15 p.m.
March 21 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Joint meeting of professional groups on In-
strumentation and on Space Electronics and Tele-
metry.
March 22 — Geological Society of Washing-
ton
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
March 23 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, W ashington Section
General meeting, elections.
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
40
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
March 23 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Antennas and Propa-
gation.
March 24 — Philosophical Society of Wash-
ington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
March 28 — American Society of Civil Engi-
neers, National Capital Section
Luncheon meeting, YWCA, 17th and K Sts.,
N.W., noon.
March 28 — Society of American Bacterio-
logists, Washington Branch
A. C. Sanders, M. J. Pelczar, Jr., and Susan
Chapman, Walter Reed Army Institute of Re-
search and University of Maryland, ‘The Syner-
gistic Role of Staphylococcus in ‘penicillin-resist-
ant’ gonorrhea”; and H. E. Hopps, J. L. Show-
acre, and J. E. Smadel, NIH, “Intracellular Infec-
tion of Tissue Culture Cells with Salmonella
typhosa.”
Sternberg Auditorium, Walter Reed Army Insti-
tute Center, 8:00 p.m.
March 30 — Society for Experimental Bio-
logy and Medicine, District of Columbia
Section
Gorman Auditorium, Georgetown University
Medical Center, 8:00 p.m.
ACADEMY ACTIVITIES
JANUARY BOARD MEETING
The following notes are for the timely informa-
tion of the membership ; they are not the official
minutes of the meeting. — Ed.
The Board of Managers held its 534th meeting
on January 17 at NBS, with President Wood
presiding. The following were present: William
G. Allen, Carl I. Aslakson, Gerhard M. Brauer,
William G. Brombacher, Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr.,
Aurel O. Foster, Francois N. Frenkiel, Wayne C.
Hall, Regina F. Herzfeld, Keith C. Johnson, Mary
L. Fell, Kathryn Knowlton, Archibald T. McPher-
i son, Howard S. Rappleye, Harald A. Rehder,
Raymond J. Seeger, Doys A. Shorb, Heinz Specht,
| Jack C. Thompson, Benjamin D. Van Evera, and
I Lawrence A. Wood.
Dr. Wood spoke briefly of his appreciation for
the work of the Board during 1960, then asked
for the annual reports of standing committees.
In the absence of Dr. Stiehler, the report of
. ! the Meetings Committee was presented by Dr.
Wood. (See abstract of report elsewhere in this
issue.) The report was accepted.
Dr. Hall presented the report of the Member-
1 j! ship Committee. (See abstract of report else-
where in this issue.) The report was accepted.
Dr. Hall also gave the first reading of eight
! nominees for membership.
March, 1961
Dr. Wood referred the Board to the final report
of the Awards Committee presented at the meet-
ing of December 20. (See December meeting
notes in the February Journal, page 24, also the
story, “Academy Presents Awards to Six,” on page
11 of the same issue.)
Dr. McPherson presented the report of the
Policy and Planning Committee. (See abstract of
report elsewhere in this issue.) The report was
accepted.
Because of the illness of Dr. Schubert, Dr.
Wood presented the report of the Committee on
Encouragement of Science Talent. (See abstract
of report elsewhere in this issue. ) The report was
accepted.
Dr. Van Evera presented the report of the
Committee on Grants-in-Aid for Research. (See
abstract of report elsewhere in this issue.) The
report was accepted.
In the absence of Dr. Seeger, Dr. Wood pointed
out that a report of the Committee on Science
Education concerning Joint Board activities, pre-
pared in July 1960 by John K. Taylor, had previ-
ously been distributed. (The Committee and the
Joint Board are appointed for the fiscal year be-
ginning July 1.) The report was accepted.
Mr. Johnson commended the Committee on
Science Education and the Joint Board for their
help to the metropolitan area schools. Dr. Mc-
Pherson pointed out that the Washington Acad-
emy leads all the academies of the United States
in improvement of science education.
Following the second reading of their names
by Dr. Hall, 22 persons were elected to member-
sip in the Academy, as follows: Wendell L. Ander-
son, Mortimer C. Bloom, Carl R. Brewer. James
W. Butler, Homer W. Carhart, James M. Cassel,
Irvin L. Cooter, Jules R. de Launay. Joachim B.
Ehrman, Richard P. Farrow, Robert G. Glasser,
Harry D. Holmgren, Billy M. Horton, Charles H.
Klute, Paul E. Landis, Helen D. Park, Maynard
J. Pro, Edward J. Schremp, Max Tryon, John P.
Vinti, Walter W. Wada, and Carl H. Walther.
Dr. Specht submitted the secretary’s annual
report, which was accepted. (See February
Journal, page 19.)
Captain Aslakson submitted the treasurer’s an-
nual report, which was accepted. (See abstract in
February Journal, page 18.)
Speaking for the Journal , Mr. Detwiler com-
mented that the 1960 volume constitutes its own
report of accomplishment. He pointed out that
the quality of any issue of the Journal and its cost
are closely linked together. Also, he noted that he
is attempting to get each issue into the mails in
advance of the Academy meeting, in order that it
may be used as an encouragement to the mem-
bers— by way of a monthly meeting page — to
attend the meetings.
Dr. Seeger having arrived r.t the meeting, he
discussed the situation of the Committee on
Science Education and the operation of the Joint
41
Board. He pointed out that the Board had turned
into an operating group rather than a sponsoring
and directing group, and that this could not con-
tinue. He announced that a Committee had been
set up to inquire into proper activities for the
Joint Board on a long-rang basis.
Dr. Wood then addressed himself to the Board
as retiring president. (See his remarks in the
February Journal , page 9.) He expressed appre-
ciation of the fine work of committee chairmen
and appointees, and the cooperation of all in-
volved in the Academy’s administration.
ABSTRACTS OF ANNUAL REPORTS
OF STANDING COMMITTEES
Committee on Meetings
The Committee met twice during the year and
arranged eight meetings, all held in the John
Wesley Powell Auditorium at 2170 Florida Ave-
nue. The 447th meeting was held on February
18, 1960; the 448th, on March 17; the 449th, on
April 21; the 450th, on May 19; the 451st, on
October 20; the 452nd, on November 17; the
453rd, on December 15; and the 454th, on Janu-
ary 19, 1961. (For names of speakers and their
topics, see secretary’s annual report in February
Journal, page 19.)
The attendance at meetings ranged from a low
of 15 at the meeting of December 15 to about 200
at the jointly-sponsored meeting of November 17.
The meeting of October 20 had an attendance of
over 130, and was the largest of those sponsored
solely by the Academy.
The weather and lack of notices to members
contributed to the low attendance at the 453rd
meeting. Nevertheless, the 449th and 450th meet-
ings also were poorly attended, with less than
50 persons present. On the other hand, the en-
thusiastic reception of the jointly-sponsored meet-
ings indicates that more meetings of this type
should be held.
The local section of the American Meteoro-
logical Society was not in a position to co-sponsor
the meeting of December 15. However, the sec-
tion would like to hold a joint meeting with the
Academy during 1961, since the last joint meeting
was over five years ago.
Committee on Membership
This was the second full year of operation under
a system whereby each Committee member except
the chairman served on a panel of six scientists
(members of the Academy) which reviewed nomi-
nations to the Academy of individuals active in
particular areas of science. Under this procedure,
nominations were routed by the general chairman
to the proper panel chairman for action of the
panel. Generally, nominations were mailed from
member to member within the panels. Then, on
the first Wednesday evening of each month, the
Membership Committee proper met to discuss its
work and complete action on the nominations
which had been reviewed by the panels. The
system seemed to work quite satisfactorily, al-
though it seemed to be a bit slow in overall re-
sponse. Of the 100 nominations handled by the
Committee in 1960, 83 were elected to the Acad-
emy; 5 are still within the Committee; 3 were j
rejected; 1 was referred to the Board of Managers I
for action; and 8 were to be submitted to the
Board for first reading on January 17. For com- ;
parison with the previous year, between 15 and !
20 percent more nominations were reviewed by
this Committee than by the previous one.
There are several matters which may need to i
be considered by future Membership Commit-
tees. For example, under the present setup in-
volving panels, there is no specific provision for j
handling nominations of scientists who are pri-
marily in administrative posts, or teaching posts.
Therefore, such nominees must be considered by
the Membership Committee itself. This situation
has not led to any particular difficulties, since the
candidates with these qualifications have been
few in number. No change in the present setup
is recommended.
Another and more important matter has to do
with the action to be taken on certain recommen-
dations of the Awards Committee. The last two
chairmen of that Committee have submitted re-
ports in which selected, unsuccessful nominees for
awards were recommended for membership. Since
the examination by the Awards Committee of the
qualifications of a candidate is more than adequate ;
to assess these qualifications, it is not believed 1
necessary for the Membership Committee to sub-
ject these candidates to further examination and !
review ... It is recommended that in future, j
when the Awards Committee makes positive
recommendations for the election of suitable \
candidates, the following procedure should be !
observed: The Awards Committee should submit
to the Board of Managers, with copies to the Mem-
bership Committee, one-paragraph statements re-
garding the qualifications and other pertinent
information concerning the candidates, together
with the statement that the Awards Committee
members are the sponsors for the nominations; !
the respective citations should also be included.
Then the action to be taken by the Membership
Committee need be only to determine whether
the nominee actually desires election. When this
information has been obtained, it can be for- !
warded to the Board of Managers, together with
the recommendation of the Membership Commit- ;
tee. In the case of those candidates who desire j
election to the Academy, the action of the Mem- j
bership Committee would be expected to endorse
that of the Awards Committee, or give reasons
for a different view.
Policy and Planning Committee
The Committee reviewed a new draft of the
Standing Rules of the Academy and recommended
to the Board that they be adopted, with minor
revisions.
42
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
The Committee considered a proposal to estab-
lish a new Academy award in the earth sciences
or earth and space sciences. It recommended that
such an award not be established, but instead,
that two awards be given in any of the present
fields in which there are unusually well-qualified
candidates.
The major activity of the Committee is unfin-
ished. This concerns the promotion of closer
relations between the affiliated societies and the
Academy, in order that the Academy may be of
greater service to the individual societies, their
membership, and the scientific community of
Washington. To further these objectives, a din-
ner conference has been planned to be held at
the Cosmos Club on February 1, at which the
following topics will be discussed: (1) Prepara-
tion of a joint directory similar to the 1947 direc-
tory; (2) a look ahead toward the establishment
of a central headquarters for the Academy and
the larger affiliated societies; (3) increase in
Academy membership; and (4) promotion of
interdisciplinary discussions and meetings. (See
report of this meeting, elsewhere in the present
issue.)
Committee on Encouragement of Science Talent
The Committee was very active in 1960, par-
ticularly as concerns its work with the Washing-
ton Junior Academy of Sciences. In this field,
several categories might be considered:
(a) Monthly meetings were held by the WJAS
Governing Council, in which Committee members
participate. These meetings were, on the whole,
well attended and considerable business was
transacted.
(b) The Committee and WJAS again were
prime movers in local science fairs. The science
fairs this year were larger than any in the past;
WJAS contributed $1,000 to their support.
(c) The Committee acted in behalf of the
Science Talent Search; in particular, local win-
ners were selected and honored for outstanding
scholarship at a joint meeting of WJAS and the
senior Academy on March 17.
(d) The Committee helped organize the science
trips to Philadelphia last fall. A total of 3,714
students participated in the five trips that were
arranged; over $2,500 was realized by this project.
(e) The system of area councilors, devised in
1959, worked very well in 1960. Each of the areas
had an active representative.
(f) Much work has gone into new selection
procedures for membership in WJAS. Some of
us have been disturbed that election to WJAS*
was based only on science fair competition. The
new procedure makes it possible for others, such
as those who are active in school science clubs, to
be elected.
(g) A special meeting of all science club presi-
dents in the area was held on December 17. Over
125 people attended, including science club presi-
dents, WJAS members, scientists, and educators.
It is hoped that this will augur well for increased
liaison between WJAS and science clubs of the
individual schools, and for strengthening the
science club movement.
(h) The Committee and WJAS sponsored the
second Science Conference, held December 29 at
an all-day session in the Ambassador Hotel. Some
25 papers were read by students in divided meet-
ings. The Conference was an unqualified success.
The Committee sponsored an interesting sum-
mer research program. In this program, 15 se-
lected students were given the opportunity to
work without remuneration at the National Insti-
tutes of Health; they were given $10 a week to
meet their expenses. Based on this experience,
the Committee has proposed to the National Sci-
ence Foundation that it finance a similar program
for the summer of 1961.
Committee on Grants-in-Aid for Research
In 1960, as in 1959. there was a minimum of
activity by this Committee. Three applications
for funds were received, of which two were rec-
ommended by the Committee and granted by the
Board.
John Budlong of McLean High School received
a grant of $50.00 to aid in an experiment on
determining the velocity of light. On his own,
Budlong had made arrangements to use facilities
of the telephone company, including the roof of
its building and one of its towers for reflection
purposes. After Budlong had purchased the parts
for the equipment he needed and had it all cali-
brated, vandals destroyed a good part of it. In
the time that remained, using his salvaged equip-
ment, he switched the experiment to one on the
velocity of sound, in which he did an exceedingly
good piece of work. He was awarded a first place
in the Northern Virginia Science Fair; because
he had already spent an excessive amount of time
on the project, he did not compete in other fairs.
Michael Finnegan received a grant of $55.80
for chemicals to be used in a study of chromic
acid oxidation through the synthesis of o-nitro
acetophenone from o-ethyl nitrobenzene.
William Burchaell of Fairfax, who received a
grant of $92.00 at the end of 1959 to buy supplies
for a chromatographic study of amino acids in
the thyroid, reports that he entered his project
in five science competitions and received the fol-
lowing awards:
(1) Second place in senior biochemistry, Fair-
fax High School S'cience Fair.
(2) First place in 11th grade chemistry. North-
ern Virginia Science Fair.
(3) First place in chemistry. University of
Virginia Science Open House (award by Society
of the Sigma Xi) .
(4) Second place ($50 award), Randolph
Macon Science Competition. (Judging was on an
overall basis, with no categories for age, grade,
or field of project.)
(5) First place in chemistry ($50 award),
43
March, 1961
Virginia State Science Fair, sponsored by the
Virginia Junior Academy of Science.
The recommendations of last year’s Committee
are repeated here: (1) The Committee should
consist of a single individual; (2) each grant re-
quest should be referred to a scientist competent
in the subject field, who would interview the stu-
dent to determine the value and feasibility of the
proposal; (3) it should be emphasized that the
purpose of the grants is to assist students in their
research, not primarily to help them prepare for
a science fair project; (4) any project should
involve some research; (5) the funds should be
for the parts out of which equipment can be made,
rather than the equipment itself; (6) as an aid
to the Committee chairman, the directory of the
Washington Academy should list the field of in-
terest of each member.
JOINT BOARD
ON SCIENCE EDUCATION
The annual Engineers, Scientists, and Architects
Day Luncheon held at the Presidential Arms in
Washington on Thursday, February 23, was the
occasion for the presentation of Distinguished
Teacher Awards to 12 local elementary, junior
high, and senior high school teachers. In addi-
tion, 52 other teachers received citations for out-
standing teaching of science and mathematics.
Engineers, Scientists, and Architects Day was
established several years ago to honor and call
public attention to the contributions of these
professions to human progress. Because of the
prime importance of good teaching to technologic
advancement, it seemed proper to use this occa-
sion to honor outstanding teachers. Accordingly,
the Joint Board on Science Education in 1958
established the Distinguished Teacher Awards.
From nominations submitted by the school princi-
pals, 12 are selected for the Award. An unspeci-
fied number of the nominees are selected on the
basis of very meritorious commendation to receive
a citation.
The Award consists of an engrossed certificate
and personalized copies of the Smithsonian Treas-
ury of Science, as well as the Scientific American
Science Project Book. The others receive certifi-
cates of citation. All are honored guests of the
Joint Board at the ES&A Day luncheon.
Distinguished Teaching Awards were presented
to: Helen B. Arni, Westlawn Elementary School
(Fairfax) ; Ruth H. Bauer, Northwestern H. S.
(Prince Georges) ; Sister Mary Blanch, Im-
maculata H. S. (D.C.) ; Thomas H. Christie,
Washington-Lee H. S. (Arlington) ; Lucille T.
Freeman, Monroe Elementary School (D.C.) ;
Dale E. Gerster, Bladensburg H. S. (Prince
Georges) .
Also, George A. K. Jones, Glasgow Intermediate
School (Fairfax) ; Alfred C. Rogan, Northwood
H. S. (Montgomery) ; Ephraim G. Salins, Spring-
brook H. S. (Montgomery) ; Grace H. S’mith,
LaSalle Laboratory School (D.C.) ; John M.
Winters, Sherwood Jr.-Sr. H. S. (Montgomery) ;
Robert L. Wistort, High Point H. S. (Prince
Georges) .
Certificates of citation were presented to the
following:
From the District of Columbia — Josephine A.
Berkey, Kramer Jr. H. S. ; Carolynne G. Branson,
Terrell Jr. H. S’.; Mrs. Howland M. Caple, Shodd
Elementary; Rev. John A. Coughlan, Archbishop
Carroll H. S.; Louise A. Dickson, Anacostia
H. S. ; Edna K. Dodge, Hearst Elementary; Betty
B. Francisco, Brightwood Elementary; Hilda
Jecklin, Calvin Coolidge H. S. ; Grace E.
McDowell, Garnet-Patterson Jr. H. S. ; .lean
McGregor, McKinley H. S. ; Bessie Pinner, Shaw
Jr. H. S. ; Annie T. Reid, Hine Jr. H. S.; Rev
Floyd Schulze, Mackin H. S.; Mrs Hollie C.
Tillinghast, Miller Jr. H. S’.; Virginia E. Tyler,
Lafayette Elementary; Opal D. Weida, Ballon
H. S. ; Judith S. Wescott, Macfarland Jr. H S. ;
Howard S. White, Taft Jr. H. S. ; Jane K. White,
Janney Elementary.
From Arlington County — Felix Blackwood, Jr.,
Hoffman-Boston H. S. ; Donald Buttermore, Gun-
ston Jr. H. S.; Patricia J. Custer, Jefferson
Jr. H. S.; lone B. Surrett, Williamsburg Jr. H. S.;
Simeon Taylor III, Yorktown H. S. ; Walter
Taylor, Hoffman-Boston H. S.; Cornelius Van
Scott, Nottingham Elementary; Gilmer Weatherly.
Wakefield H. S’.
From Fairfax County — Sadie Bruin, Herndon
Elementary; Deloris G. Evans, James Lee Ele-
mentary; Emmett A. Hutcheson, Jr., Glasgow
Intermediate; Marie Jones, Belvedere Elemen-
tary; Russell G. Kerlin, Jr., Longfellow Inter-
mediate; Mary M. Moore, Crestwood Elementary:
Herbert P. Rice, J. E. B. Stuart H. S.; Mary
W. Stine, Groveton H. S.
From the city of Falls Church — Dorothy Moore,
Jefferson Elementary.
From Charles County — W. Edward Lakes, La
Plata Jr. H. S.
From Montgomery County — Charles C.
Amtower, Newport Jr. H. S. ; Mrs. Adnah J.
Berthright, Takoma Park Jr. H. S.; Mrs. Francis
R. Borders. Wyngate Elementary; Martha H.
Green, Rock Terrace Elementary; Patricia L.
Johnson, Belt Jr. H. S. ; Agnes M. Nachman,
Kensington Jr. H. S.
From Prince Georges County — Barbara Anne
Creegan, West Lanham Llills Elementary; Eliza-
beth Erling, Glenridge Jr. H. S.; Joyce Harris,
Adelphi Elementary; Clifford Hersey, S’urratts-
ville H. S. ; Barrett L. McKown, Suitland H. S. ;
James M. Skidmore, Laurel Jr. H. S.: Frances
Wells, District Heights Elementary.
44
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
THE BROWNSTONE TOWER
On October 26,
1951, I had occasion
to visit the labora-
tories of the Arthur
D. Little Company
in Cambridge, Mass.
While there 1 was
taken to the roof of
the building to see an
unusual pilot plant for
the continuous pro-
duction under sun-
light of large quanti-
ties of a microscopic,
unicellular alga of the genus Chlorella. The
Company’s purpose was to determine the
feasibility of growing Chlorella economically
for use as a food or food supplement for
man or animals. Theoretically, the Chlorella
farmer would need only a recirculating system
for an aqueous, carbon-dioxide-enriched, nutrient
medium that would permit optimum growth and
reproduction of these cells under sunlight. And
he would need means of maintaining the desired
concentration of the medium while continuously
harvesting cells uncontaminated by other micro-
organisms. Then he would centrifuge or filter
and dry the cells and market the resulting dry
green powder. Or the chlorophyll could be ex-
tracted and the dry powder marketed without
it. One could easily imagine an automatic process
in which nutrient materials and carbon dioxide
would be added at one point and dry Chlorella
powder would be bagged for shipment at another.
[ really though Chlorella was “’in the bag” at
that time. To be sure, it tasted like grass to
me, but I supposed it would be a simple matter
to disguise or mask its disagreeable flavor, es-
pecially if it were used as a food supplement.
On February 6, 1961, almost ten years later, 1
learned that Chlorella is not ready for commercial
production. My informant is one of the brilliant
younger investigators in the Washington area —
Robert W. Krauss, professor of plant physiology
at the University of Maryland and a member of
the Washington Academy of Sciences. I visited
him in his office on the third floor of H. J.
Patterson Hall, toured his laboratories, and had
lunch with him and his colleague, R. A. Galloway,
at the University’s Faculty Club. I did not see
his research associate, Constantine Sorokin, but
observed his work on a strain of Chlorella that
grows best at 39° C.
Bob Krauss has been working on the physiology
of algae since he was a predoctoral student at
the University of Maryland in 1949-51. He came
to the University to study with Hugh G. Gauch,
and he himself proposed to Professor Gauch that
he investigate the inorganic nutrition of algae, not
because of its practical value, for he was not then
aware of it, but because the subject excited his
curiosity. I)r. Gauch and Ronald Bamford, chair-
man of the Department of Botany and dean of
Maryland’s Graduate School, approved Bob’s
project and helped him procure what he needed
to do the work, in the last ten years he has
become an authority on his subject, and his labor-
atory is recognized as one of the leading centers
of study in this field.
Bob became aware of the possibilities of Chlor-
ella farming while he was still a graduate student.
He told me that during World War II, H. A.
Spoehr and H. W. Milner, of the Carnegie Insti-
tution’s Department of Plant Biology at Palo
Alto, Calif., had looked for antibiotics in algae
without much success but had found something
else that seemed to have practical possibilities;
namely, the fact that the chemical composition
of the cells was subject to wide variation depend-
ing on the composition of the medium. Thus one
could at will produce cells high in protein, fat,
or carbohydrate. Vannevar Bush, then director
of the Carnegie Institution, saw possibilities of
producing needed food substances in a new and
efficient manner. Bob Krauss was already study-
ing factors affecting the mass culture of certain
algae and, remaining at the University of Mary-
land, he became a research fellow of the Carnegie
Institution, which, together with the Office of
Naval Research, supported his research for sev-
eral years. But Bob never allowed himself to be
diverted from basic research to the development
of the production of algae for food. He felt that
there was much to learn about the physiology ol
these algae before engineering research could be
intelligently applied to them, and he believes that
is still true today. Chlorella is not yet “in the
bag,” but the need for it as food in some parts of
the world may be so great that one would expect
persistent experimentation on its commercial pro-
duction by government or industry or both. Some-
thing is being done in Japan by H. Tamiya and
his assistants. Some, like A. T. McPherson, past
president of our Academy, might prefer to put
equivalent effort and funds into research on syn-
thetic food production, uncomplicated by the
vagaries of a sensitive living microorganism.
One cannot in limited space describe in detail
the research that goes on in Bob’s laboratories.
Because his experimentation is quantitative, the
equipment in his rooms in the south end of the
third floor and in the attic of Patterson Hall
reminds one of apparatus in a laboratory of physi-
cal chemistry. To be controlled are the duration,
wave length, and intensity of light, the tempera-
ture, the nutrient medium, and the sterility of
cultures. And arrangements must be made for
quantitative sampling of the culture from time to
time. Radioactive tracers are used in some ex-
periments. with the necessary equipment. Bob
does not regard his laboratories as engaged in
research on photosynthesis, but he must be as
March, 1961
45
skilled in light control and measurement as if
photobiology were his specialty. A room is being
constructed now for the calibration of his light
producing and measuring equipment. One corner
of one room does look biological, for there he
keeps stand-by cultures of green algae growing
on agar slants. There were dozens of tubes here
containing many species of algae.
How does one tell one species of Chlorella
from another? They all look like tiny mottled
green spheres, and the cell wall is without char-
acteristic pattern. As among certain bacteria, a
physiological classification is more useful than a
morphological one. Bob now has a Japanese
student, Miss Ikuko Shihira, who is working on
the physiological classification of the species of
this genus, which live in both fresh and salt
water. I wondered whether the American Type
Culture Collection here in Washington has a
comprehensive collection of green algae. Bob
says they have only a few; the best collection is
at Indiana University.
Chlorella farming is not the only possible prac-
tical application of green algae. Some attention
has been given to the use of algae to assist in
the purification of the effluent from sewage treat-
ment plants. And since bioastronautics became
a subject for serious study, work is being done
on the use of algae for adding oxygen to and
removing carbon dioxide from space vehicles.
Also, increasing attention is being paid to bio-
logical oceanography, in which the physiology
and ecology of plankton, “the grass of the sea,”
are important. All these subjects are connected
with Bob Krauss and his laboratories.
It was heartening to see him at the height of
his powers, well supported financially both by
granting agencies and his own university, attract-
ing good students whom he will train in basic
research, carrying his message outside his own
campus not only through his publications but by
invitational lectures, and finally acting like a good
citizen of the Washington Academy of Sciences
as adviser to serious high school students who
want to use algae in their science fair projects.
May he continue to have the courage and the
wisdom to say no! whenever attempts are made,
as they will be, to lure him away from his princi-
pal objective — to learn more about the physiology
of algae!
— Frank L. Campbell
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
The International Geophysical Year in-
vestigations have yielded tons of records of
data on earth, sea, air, and space. More than
15 tons of records are now on hand from the
Antarctic alone. Many years will be required
for their study and digestion. According to the
most recent annual report of the Smithsonian
Institution, this vast accumulation of data results
from the work of between 20,000 and 30,000 sci-
entists of 66 nations in “the greatest cooperative
enterprise for peaceful purposes in all human
history.” A number of outstanding discoveries
have been made. Many more doubtless will come
in the future from the gradual assimilation of
the data.
The National Bureau of Standards has es-
tablished two new Technical Advisory Com-
mittees, one on Calibration and Measurement
Services, and one on Enginering and Re-
lated Standards. The purpose of the committees
is said to aid the Bureau in cooperating with
industry in the fields of precision measurement,
calibration, and standard practices. They include
leaders in specialized fields drawn from industry.
These committees are in addition to a group of
technical advisory panels composed of representa-
tives of leading professional scientific and engi-
neering societies that advise various technical
divisions of the Bureau.
The mechanism by which hydrogen atoms
are removed from ethane during vacuum
ultraviolet photolysis has been determined
at the National Bureau of Standards. This
finding is a product of the basic research program
of the Physical Chemistry Division. By means of
spectrographic analysis of deuterated samples,
H. Okabe and J. R. McNesby (a member of the
Washington Academy of Sciences) showed that
two hydrogen atoms are usually split from a single
carbon atom to form a hydrogen molecule. Ethyli-
dene, which is produced simultaneously, reacts
further to form higher hydrocarbons found in
the products.
Georgetown University has received re-
search and education grants amounting to
$222,860. The Very Reverend Edward B. Bunn,
S. J., University president, announced on Decem-
ber 31 the award of $162,060 by the Department
of Health Education and Welfare for medical and
dental research; $50,800 by the National Science
Foundation for support of a “Summer Institute
in Mathematics for High School Teachers of
Mathematics”; and a number of smaller grants.
A specialized digital computer for use as
a research tool on the possibilities of an au-
tomatic weather station has been developed
by the National Bureau of Standards in co-
operation with the U. S. Weather Bureau.
AMOS' (Automatic Meteorological Observation
Station) IV, the computer, receives and proc-
esses data from weather-sensing instruments and
transmits the results via teletype to a central
forecasting station and to airport weather stations.
Automatic weather stations could be widely dis-
tributed, and would be especially useful in rela-
tively inaccessible locations that are important
sources of early data on meteorological activity.
46
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Food and Drug Administration has seized
over 1,900 tons of soybeans for contamina-
tion with poisonous Crotalaria seeds in more
than 30 Federal Court actions in Virginia
and North Carolina. Crotalaria is used as a
soil-improving crop for sandy soil in the South-
eastern States. Seed from volunteer Crotalaria
plants growing in soybean fields become mixed
with soybeans during harvest. Presence of Crota-
laria seed in feed has been reported to cause
mortalities in poultry flocks. Food and Drug
scientists found that as little as three seeds per
pound of feed causes retarded growth in rats.
Crotalaria seeds are about one-third the size of
soybeans and can be removed by sifting.
A new National Meteorological Experiment
Center has been established at Sterling, Vir-
ginia, by the Weather Bureau, U.S. Depart-
ment of Commerce. It occupies a 400-acre
site, 25 miles west-northwest of Washington near
the Dulles International Airport. The Center will
conduct field tests to evaluate the accuracy,
adaptability and reliability of experimental
meteorological observational instruments. It will
also be responsible for taking upper air and solar
radiation observations for the Washington area.
In addition, it will assist various Weather Bureau
divisions in obtaining data in various fields of
geophysical research and data for other govern-
ment agencies.
United States scientists now may easily
have their unused publications transferred
to Latin American libraries. A new program
for transfer has been organized by the Division
of Science Development of the Pan American
Union. Under this program, Latin American
libraries are being urged to become members of
the U.S. Book Exchange (USBE), a nonprofit
corporation established in Washington in 1948,
as a central office for exchange of duplicate copies
of books and journals between libraries throughout
the world. Membership includes about 1800 li-
braries, more than half of which are in foreign
countries. About 1,500,000 items are exchanged
annually. Latin American libraries will request
journals through regular USBE procedures. If
certain items are not available in the USBE files,
the Division of Science Development will an-
nounce such needs through appropriate profes-
sional journals. U.S. scientists may send their un-
used publications to the U.S. Book Exchange,
3335 V Street, N.E., Washington 18, D.C., or to
the Division of Science Development, Pan Amer-
ican Union, Washington 6, D.C. The estimated
value and mailing costs may be claimed as income
tax deductions.
A Symposium on Large Capacity Memory
Techniques for Computing Systems is being
sponsored by the Office of Naval Research.
It will be held in the Department of Interior
Auditorium, Washington, on May 23-25. Atten-
tion will be focused on new ideas, research, and
developments which may lead to novel computer
memories with large capacities. Future advances
in computer processing depend to a large extent
on the development of new computing memories.
Organizations engaged in appropriate research
and development activities will be invited to con-
tribute papers. Attendance is open to all in-
terested technical workers.
Biological Sciences Communication Pro-
ject is the name of a large-scale study to
identify and analyze all steps in the flow of
biological information from source to user.
The study is being made by the American Insti-
tute of Biological Sciences under a grant from
the National Science Foundation. It is under the
direction of Charles W. Shilling. The study will
include examination of methods of acquiring,
indexing, storing, and retrieving printed scientific
literature, needs of biologists for information, use
of information, and characteristics of dissemina-
tion activities of existing agencies. Also, the
effectiveness of visiting biologists’ programs, con-
ferences, and symposia will be considered.
March, 1961
47
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
48
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Volume 51
MARCH 1961
No. 3
CONTENTS
Page
The Academy’s Program for 1961 29
Unorthodoxy in Science 30
Academy Seeks Closer Ties with Affiliated Societies 33
WAS Organization for 1961 34
MARCH MEETING 36
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 37
Affiliated Societies ^ 38
Calendar of Events 40
Academy Activities 41
Joint Board 44
The Browns tone Tower 45
Science and Development 46
Washington Academy of Sciences
1530 — P St., N.W.
Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
2nd Class Postage
Paid at
Washington, D. C.
I. I IftAfty of
MBORC Tum
22 Divinity
CAMBRIDGE Z
A ft N Q L 0
AV £
8 MASS
MS
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
Vol. 51 • No. 4
APRIL 1961
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Lloyd N. Ferguson, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
OFFICERS OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
President: Philip H. Abelson, Geophysical Laboratory
President-Elect: Benjamin D. Van Evera, George Washington University
Secretary: Heinz Specht, National Institutes of Health
Treasurer : Norman F. Braaten, Coast and Geodetic Survey
Geology and Geologists in Fiction'
Mark W. Pangborn, Jr.
The geologist, on reading today’s novels,
dealing with business man, soldier, or art-
ist, may wonder just what sort of literature
has been written about his own profession.
Let us take a quick look at 20 or so adult
novels in English which most clearly fea-
ture geology or geologists, and see for
ourselves just how our science fares. We
will first consider escape literature, includ-
ing science fiction, adventure novels, and
detective stories.
The earliest appearance of geology in
science fiction must surely be in Jules
Verne’s novel, A Journey to the Center of
the Earth,1 originally published in 1864
and reprinted in English many times. In
it the narrator and his uncle, Professor
Hardwigg, descend into the crater of
Mount Sneffels, in Iceland, and, proceed-
ing downward, discover that the earth’s
interior is hollow and inhabited by mam-
moths, plesiosaurs, and the like. This
hollow earth theme has been used by other
authors, notably Edgar Rice Burroughs,
who built a whole series of lurid romances
around Pellucidar and its grisly inhabit-
ants. Of them the less said the better.
Conan Doyle’s The Lost World,2 how-
ever, is a most convincing novel about the
survival of extinct species into modern
times. In it the explorer-geologist George
Edward Challenger leads a party to a great
plateau hidden in the Brazilian back coun-
try; the top of this plateau is populated
by dinosaurs and ape-men, among whom
our adventurers have experiences which
would overwhelm less stout hearts. As
one might expect, the creator of Sherlock
Holmes brings his characters vividly to
life. One of them, the atrociously over-
bearing Professor Challenger, made such
a hit with the public that Doyle made him
the hero of several short stories. In one
* Condensed from a talk given before the Geo-
logical Society of Washington, January 11, 1961.
of them, When the World Screamed2
Doyle definitely anticipates the Mohole by
45 years.
Another shining example of science fic-
tion is You Shall Know Them,4 by the
French novelist Vercors, in which a scien-
tific expedition discovers the man-ape,
Paranthropus erectus, in the New Guinea
jungle. No expedition, including the voy-
age of the Beagle, ever brought back more
trouble. In a moment of weakness the
expedition journalist is persuaded to take
part in a great scientific experiment: by
means of artificial insemination he finds
himself mated to a female Paranthropus,
and a father. Seized with remorse, the
journalist murders his son and dares the
police to do anything about it; the police
do, and the remainder of the book deals
with the ponderous efforts of British justice
to determine whether or not the hybrid is
Homo sapiens, living under the laws of
God and man. We wonder why the author,
working his hilarious vein, found it neces-
sary to describe the party’s geologist, Dr.
Kreps, as resembling “a pachyderm, with
a walrus moustache . . . with a voice, high
and fluting as a young boy’s.”
In eight or ten rather unconvincing
novels man and prehistoric beasts are
brought face to face by means of gadgetry.
In the best known of these tales, Before
the Dawn,5 by Caltech mathematician Eric
Temple Bell, scientists build a “time re-
versal machine” and are rewarded by
glimpses of gory battles between dino-
saurs. A better example is L. Sprague
De Camp’s delightful short story, Employ-
ment,6 in which paleontologist Gill Pratt
discovers how to reconstitute prehistoric
animals from their bones by electrochemi-
cal means; he begins by reconstituting
Castoroides, a rather innocuous mammal
of the late Pleistocene; you can imagine
the security problems faced by his har-
49
April, 1961
assed staff as Pratt works back into the
Mesozoic.
Another popular form of science fiction
depicts the lives and times of early man.
Most of this literature has been written
for boys, who find this genre quite irre-
sistible; a few titles, like Vardis Fisher’s
Darkness and the Deep,7 may appeal to
adults.
A journey in Other Worlds,8 written
in 1894 by John Jacob Astor, is especial-
ly interesting, for in it we have the first
fictional appearance of that now familiar
figure, the government geologist called in
to offer advice on major undertakings. In
the year 2000, Professor Cortlandt, an
“able man . . . with high forehead, grey-
ish hair, and quick grey eyes” is the tech-
nical advisor to the Terrestrial Axis
Straightening Corporation. This organiza-
tion has discovered the powerful force
“apergy,” and hopes to use it to straight-
en the earth’s axis from 23% degrees to 0
degrees, thereby giving the earth a more
uniform temperature. The Professor leads
an expedition in an apergy-driven rocket
to Jupiter and Saturn, which are still deep
in the Mesozoic. Fortunately the book
ends before the earth’s axis is tampered
with.
Those interested in the larger problems
of geology may enjoy The Frozen Year,9
by James Blish, which is concerned with
the most publicity mad and poorly or-
ganized expedition ever to seek and get
the sponsorship of the I.G.Y. Committee.
If we do not approve of the management
of this ill-starred expedition, 1 am sure
that all of us will sympathize with its
members as they sit, shivering, around a
hole in the Polar ice, fishing tektites off
the floor of the Arctic Ocean.
Geologists appear occasionally in the
straight adventure novel. Among the very
best is Morgans Mountain,10 by Arthur
Mayse, in which a most attractive young
geologist rescues a pilot and his daugh-
ter who have crashed in the wilds of Brit-
ish Columbia. In similar vein is Law-
rence Earl’s The Frozen Jungle 11 in which
the last party to fly out of a Labrador
mining camp is forced down and must
spend a frightful winter in the wilderness;
the geologist, an alcoholic because of war
experiences, turns out to be the strong-
est character of the little group, and is
purged of his neurosis as he leads the cast-
aways to safety the following spring.
Volcanoes and earthquakes have been
the villains of many adventure stories
since the days of Bulwer-Lytton’s Last
Days of Pompeii. Most of these tales are
pretty corny, but Dale Van Every’s de-
scription of the New Madrid quake, in The
Trembling Earth 12 is as graphic an account
of a natural phenomenon as has ever been
written.
Most stories about caves are written
for youngsters. The adult literature is not
abundant, nor is it convincing, with the
exception of Andrew Garve’s A Hole in
the Ground .13 This is a thrilling story of
spelunking in northern England, in which
the villain is an unstable politician with
Communist leanings, and the hero a
charming and enterprising petroleum ge-
ologist who eventually makes off with the
politician’s wife.
There must be nearly a thousand ad-
venture novels with a mining background.
Most of these are “westerns” or “north-
erns” in which the prospect is nothing
more than a hook on which to hang a
story, or are sociological tracts dealing
with mine hazards or labor troubles. Less
than a hundred have solid technical or
historical backgrounds. The hero is al-
most invariably a clean, two-fisted, half-
educated chap who foils the claim jumpers
and wins the maiden’s hand, but in his
rare appearances the geologist’s role is not
always a happy one.
He first appears in 1886 in John Bode -
wins Testimony ,14 Mary Hallock Foote’s
novel about contested mine ownership.
The government geologist, Hilbury, is ob-
viously modelled on Clarence King, and is
flatteringly portrayed as a man “who
might turn up almost anywhere ... at
the swell clubs in New York and Lon-
50
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
don ... or at the President’s reception, or
digging his way up some mountain peak
above snow line.”
The hero of Silver City Heyday ,15 by
William Kehaly, is the brilliant exploration
geophysicist, Pierce Grant, whose tech-
nique and instrumentation are so ad-
vanced that he is able to block out a num-
ber of splendid ore bodies. Like all of us,
Grant is frustrated by the income tax situ-
ation, but he takes the wrong turn and
operates what is known as a moonlight
mill. A nosey Treasury agent is accidental-
ly killed, Grant takes it on the lam, and
I am sorry to say that our gifted colleague
is dropped by the sheriff’s guns.
Surely the most unethical of fictional
geologists is Bates Wallen, who sells his
services to two rival outfits in Luke
Short’s excellent western, Rimrock.19 The
book’s hero, a trusting paint salesman
turned uranium prospector, can’t under-
stand why his big rival is picking up all
the best claims, but eventually he catches
on, and poor Bates has a rough time. Li-
censing might have prevented this mess.
There must be at least 300 adventure
novels dealing with oil. Perhaps some 30
titles are soundly based in petroleum, his-
tory or technology, and in eight or ten
of them we see the form of the geologist.
Usually he plays a minor role, for the
hero, as in the mining novel, is almost
j invariably a half-educated youth who
I triumphs in the face of liquor, women,
| and skulduggery. But not always, for in
I William Heyliger’s novel Wildcat,11 in
which the details of prospecting and drill-
ing are beautifully drawn, the heroes are
two resourceful young geophysicists who
put all their savings on a flyer and strike
oil.
Perhaps a score of detective stories
feature earth science backgrounds, and in
six or eight of them geologists play impor-
! tant parts. In Frances and Richard Lock-
ridge’s Dead as a Dinosaur,18 a dedicated
j vertebrate paleontologist is murdered as
impatient members of his family try to
prevent him from squandering all his
money on the scientific expeditions of
the Broadly Institute of Paleontology,
“across the Park from the American Mu-
seum.”
Murder in Fiji,19 is one of two out-
standing whodunits by news-analyst John
W. Vandercook. In it the villain discovers
gold-bearing andesite deposits, then is
forced into several murders, hoping to pre-
vent his secret from leaking; the Fiji gov-
ernment geologist breaks the case by cor-
relating the murder localities with the an-
desite deposits as shown on his geological
map. The other story, Murder in New
Guinea^9 features a maladjusted geologist
with Communist leanings. This fellow dis-
covers a fabulously rich uranium lode,
and is then forced to do away with a suc-
cession of prospectors who blunder onto
his secret; Vandercook’s team of detec-
tives get their man with the help of a
Geiger counter, for he has become highly
radioactive from packing samples of rich
ore over the mountains.
The foregoing titles are essentially es-
cape novels, which stress action and plot
rather than the character of the scientist,
who is only a device to move the plot along.
The following four novels, however, are
“serious,” for in them the authors have
attempted to give their geologists au-
thentic personalities, and to fit them into
a real world.
A rather charming historical novel is
Caroline Dale Owen’s Seth Way.21 In it
William Maclure discovers the unlettered
boy Seth Way in a backwoods cabin, is
impressed with his native abilities and
thirst for knowledge, and gives him a
scientific education. Seth develops into
a competent conchologist and geologist,
and becomes a leading light in the famed
New Harmony community and a colleague
of David Dale Owen and Thomas Say,
on whom he is modelled.
In his novel The Return22 Herbert Mit-
gang draws an earnest if not completely
convincing portrait of the geologist whose
conscience won’t let him be a good com-
pany man. Joseph Borken cannot accept,
April, 1961
51
in good grace, the presence of a prominent
ex-Nazi in the New York office of the large
mining firm where he works, so he gets
himself transferred to Sicily, where he
prospects for carnotite; while there he
associates with some of the poorer Ital-
ians, and comes to share their hopes for
land reform. His mere presence at a po-
litical rally threatens to compromise his
value to the company, so Borken resigns
in disgust and goes into business for him-
self. We might note here that the fictional
geologist is notably restrained in matters
of sex, if not positively frigid, but Mit-
gang’s novel contains the only known
geologists who really relax on Saturday
night.
The hero of James Aldridge’s excellent
novel, The Diplomat, 23 also is troubled by
his conscience. Micropaleontologist Mac-
Gregor, who has been brought up in Persia
and speaks fluent Persian and Russian, is
selected to serve as translator and advisor
to a British diplomat, and accompanies
him on a mission to Azerbaidjan in 1946
to see if the Russians are actually sup-
porting the rebellion of that year. The po-
litically-naive MacGregor is disturbed by
the fact that his diplomat boss is more in-
terested in saving Persia’s oil for the Brit-
ish Empire than in reporting the findings
of the mission with scientific accuracy.
Amidst a great scandal MacGregor de-
nounces Britain’s selfish role in Persia,
and returns to his adopted country as a
geologist.
Our profession gets perhaps its black-
est eye from Honore Willsie, editor of the
old Delineator magazine and purveyor of
western romances to the rocking chair
brigade. Her novel, The Exile of the Lar-
iat,2A is concerned with Hugh Stewart,
a confirmed vertebrate paleontologist who
lives what ought to be a very satisfactory
life exhuming skeletons for museums. He
faces a real problem, however, for through-
out the book his wife, in-laws, and friends
constantly badger him to get into a more
“rewarding” profession, such as politics,
where he can make use of his winning per-
sonality to benefit the citizens of his state!
Eventually he is euchered into running
for Governor of Wyoming, in order to
prevent the hydro-power lobby from flood-
ing his finest fossil bed. Stewart wins the
election, but his experiences with the State
welfare program convince him that his
old profession is basically anti-social, and
he becomes the biggest dam-builder and
do-gooder in the State. If this contrived
and discouraging novel proves anything,
it is that the authoress, like a lot of her
readers, prefers the practical man to the
egghead.
It would be foolhardy to attempt to draw
any composite portrait of the geologist
from our small sampling. We would be on
safe ground, however, if we admit that the
image of the fictional geologist is not as
good as we would like it to be. Yet, if we
must rank his image below that of the
civil engineer,25 the doctor, or the artist
in any professional popularity contest, he
surely stands above, say, the fictional poli-
tician or the man in the grey flannel suit.
The nuclear scientist 26 has been the sub-
ject of several worth-while novels in re-
cent years. We can hope that the geologist,
too, will receive similar attention from
thoughtful writers, whether scientist or pro-
fessional novelist. Unhackneyed plots are
abundant. For example, no novels have
ever been based on the exciting lives that
our pioneering geologists led in the Old
West. No author has ever pitted an honest
State geologist against the politics and dis-
appointments that sometimes crop up in
State capitals, nor has matched an enthu-
siastic field man against a neurotic wife
who resents his long absences. The prob-
lems faced by the female geologist who
invades what is essentially a man’s pro-
fession must be worthy of a novel; can we
ignore the perils that face her in the field?
If anyone doubts that a scientist should
dabble in anything so subjective as liter-
ature, be assured that creative writing is
now regarded with favor in high places: a
government geologist who recently submit-
ted a bit of science fiction to his superiors
52
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
had it returned with the comment that it
was among his best work.
It seems likely that the rising interest
in the personality and activities of the
scientist will result in more and more stories
about our profession. If it is too much to
expect another Arrowsmith, with the geolo-
gist as protagonist, let us hope that at
least some of these future novels will be
meaningful to both the scientist and the
public, and adequately reflect the thirst
for knowledge, the critical outlook, and
the self-dedication that sets the scientist
apart from the average man.
Bibliography
1 Verne, Jules. A Journey to the Center of the
Earth. New York, Dodd, Mead, 1959. 242 p.
2 Doyle, Arthur Conan. The Lost World. New
York, Random House, 1959. 319 p. (Originally
published in 1912.)
3 Doyle, Arthur Conan. When the World
Screamed. (In The Maracot Deep, and Other
Stories, by Arthur Conan Doyle. Garden City,
N. Y., Doubleday, Doran, 1929. pp. 255-307.)
4Vercors, pseud. (Jean Bruller). You Shall
Know Them. Translated by Rita Barisse. Boston,
Little, Brown, 1953. 249 p. (A paperbacked re-
print entitled “The Murder of the Missing Link”
was published by Pocket Books in 1958.)
5 Taine, J., pseud. (Eric Temple Bell). Before
the Dawn. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1934.
247 p.
r> De Camp, Lyon Sprague. Employment. (In
Imagination, Unlimited, edited by Everett Frank-
lin Bleiler. New York, Farrar, 1952. pp. 298-320.)
7 Fisher, Vardis. Darkness and the Deep. New
York, Vanguard, 1943. 296 p.
8 Astor, John Jacob. A Journey in Other
Worlds; a Romance of the Future. New York,
Appleton, 1894. 476 p.
0 Blish, James. The Frozen Year. New York,
Ballantine Books, 1957. 155 p.
10 Mayse, Arthur. Morgan’s Mountain. New
York, Morrow, 1960. 211 p.
11 Earl, Lawrence. The Frozen Jungle. New
York, Knopf, 1956. 244 p.
12 Van Every, Dale. The Trembling Earth. New
York, Messner, 1953. 310 p.
13 Garve, Andrew, pseud. (Paul Winterton). A
Hole in the Ground. London, Collins, 1952. 192 p.
14 Foote, Mary Hallock. John Bodewin’s Testi-
mony. Boston, Ticknor, 1886. 344 p.
1;’ Kehaly, William. Silver City Heyday. Phila-
delphia, Dorrance, 1953. 197 p.
10 Short, Luke, pseud. (Frederick Dilley Glid-
den). Rimrock. New York, Random House, 1955.
238 p.
17 Heyliger, William. Wildcat. New York, Ap-
pleton, 1937. 286 p.
18 Lockridge, Frances Louise Davis, and Lock-
ridge, Richard. Dead as a Dinosaur, a Mr. and
Mrs. North Mystery. Philadelphia, Lippincott,
1952. 185 p.
19 Vandercook, John Womack. Murder in Fiji.
New York, Macmillan, 1955. 192 p. (Originally
published in 1936.)
20 Vandercook, John Womack. Murder in New
Guinea. New York, Macmillan, 1959. 218 p.
21 Owen, Caroline Dale. Seth Way; a Romance
of the New Harmony Community. Boston, Hough-
ton Mifflin, 1917. 413 p.
22 Mitgang, Herbert. The Return. New York,
Simon & Schuster, 1959. 242 p.
23 Aldridge, James. The Diplomat. Boston,
Little, Brown, 1950. 631 p.
24 Willsie, Honore. Exile of the Lariat. New
York, Stokes, 1923. 357 p.
25 Florman, S'amuel C. The Civil Engineer in
Fiction. Civil Engineering, vol. 29, no. 8, August
1959, pp. 544-47.
26 Glass, Bentley. The Scientist in Contem-
porary Fiction. Scientific Monthly, vol. 85, no. 6,
December 1957, pp. 288-93.
Academy Honors Twenty-one Students
The March meeting of the Academy,
held jointly with the Washington Junior
Academy of Sciences, was the occasion for
the presentation of Certificates of Merit to
21 high school seniors in this area. The
group was cited for exceptionally meri-
torius achievement in the 1960 Westing-
house Talent Search.
At a dinner held at the Fairfax Hotel
preceding this meeting, the students and
their teachers were guests of the Academy.
Those present included the officers of the
Academy and members especially inter-
ested in encouraging science talent. B. D.
Evera of George Washington University,
president-elect of the Academy, spoke
briefly to the group on the importance of
undergraduate education and the increas-
ing need for broad preparation for sci-
entific research.
April, 1961
53
At the general meeting held in the John
Wesley Powell Auditorium of the Cosmos
Club, President Philip H. Abelson pre-
sented the certificates to the students. A
Symposium on Recent Significant Advances
in Science followed, in which Christian B.
Anfinsen, Jr., of the National Institutes of
Health discussed biology after which
Joseph Weber of the University of Mary-
land spoke on physics. Both speakers de-
scribed major problem areas to which the
students might expect to contribute upon
completion of their collegiate training.
The students receiving the Certificates of
Merit are as follows:
Thomas G. Andrews, Jr. (Bladensburg) ,
Robert C. Bost, Jr. (Washington-Lee),
Marta A. Burns (Immaculata) , John M.
Cone, Jr. (F. C. Hammond), Leland G.
Dobbs (Sidwell Friends), Michael J. Fine-
gan (Fairfax), Dennis W. Herrin (Ana-
costia), Edward C. Jones (Wakefield),
Steven L. Jordan (Montgomery Blair),
Margaret E. Kottke (Bladensburg), David
H. Malin (Walter Johnson), Rosalie A.
McCanner (Woodrow Wilson), David C.
Mendelson (Western), Margaret A. Nel-
sen (Richard Montgomery), Michael C.
Newlon (Western), Andrew R. Phelps ( Sid-
well Friends), Mary M. Shaw (Walter
Johnson), Thomas M. Souders (McLean),
Barry L. Sperling (McLean), Henry L.
Vacher (Western), Robert L. Way most
( Bethesda-Chevy Chase).
A Staff Report —
The California Academy of Sciences
In large part, the California Academy
of Sciences is to San Francisco and its
tourists as the Smithsonian’s Natural His-
tory Museum is to Washington and its
tourists. The director of the California
Academy, Robert C. Miller, who is also
its curator of invertebrate zoology, is well
acquainted with Past President Waldo L.
Schmitt of the Washington Academy, who
until he retired was head curator of biology
in the U. S. National Museum and is a
marine invertebrate zoologist.
Dr. Schmitt, Archibald T. McPherson,
and other members of the Policy and
Planning Committee, together with Presi-
dent Abelson, have been desirous of apply-
ing to the improvement of the Washington
Academy whatever might be pertinent and
useful in the organization and programs
of the California Academy and of other
academies of sciences. Accordingly, when
Dr. Schmitt heard that Dr. Miller was
coming to Washington on other business,
he invited him to talk about the California
Academy at the February 21 meeting of
the Board of Managers. Dr. Miller ac-
cepted the invitation and brought with him
printed information about the California
Academy, from which much of this staff
report has been written.
The California Academy of Sciences is
a large and successful civic enterprise, a
fruitful association between scientists and
the interested lay public. It is operated
both for the advancement of science ( chiefly
natural history) through research and for
the education of the public through ex-
hibits, demonstrations, lectures in natural
history, astronomy, etc. Its scientific work
covers the world; its educational work the
local population, resident and transient,
and those elsewhere who are reached by
its television program, “Science in
Action.”
The California Academy of Sciences was
founded in 1853 when San Francisco was
being fertilized by California gold. In
those days, science and natural history
were synonomous except in the older sci-
entific centers of the world where natural
54
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
philosophy embraced all science. The
Academy began with a “cabinet of speci-
mens” and has never deviated from its
original objectives, to collect specimens of
plants, animals, minerals, etc., to study
and describe them in scientific publications,
and to exhibit the more interesting speci-
mens to the public.
The Academy’s building and collections
were ruined by the earthquake and fire
of 1906. Thus the Academy lost its down-
town location and was permitted to rebuild
on a much more attractive site in Golden
Gate Park where its buildings are now
situated. To North American Hall, com-
pleted in 1916, was added the Steinhart
Aquarium in 1923, the Simson African
Hall in 1931, the Hall of Science in 1951,
the Alexander F. Morrison Planetarium in
1952, and the Alice Eastwood Hall of
Botany and the Mailliard Library in 1959,
all valued at more than $5,000,000. In
the United States, only the California Acad-
emy has a contiguous natural history mu-
seum, aquarium, and planetarium.
In fiscal year 1960, membership dues
constituted only 3.65 percent of the total
funds, $611,000, provided for the year.
About 36 percent came from grants and
gifts, 33 percent came from the City of San
Francisco, 23 percent was “profit” from
various enterprises of the Academy, and
the remainder, an amount greater than
dues, was called “miscellaneous.” But
$709,000 was expended during the year,
making it necessary to solicit donations
from business organizations, foundations,
and others from, whom $59,000 was col-
lected toward reduction of the operating
deficit. These figures indicate that the
California Academy was spending in 1960
about 60 times as much as the Washing-
ton Academy, exclusive of the Joint Board.
Nevertheless, Dr. Miller is not satisfied
with his Academy’s financial condition.
The Board of Trustees is trying to get a
larger appropriation from the City of San
Francisco, to increase the number of dues-
paying members, and to obtain annual sup-
port from industry and foundations for
curatorial activities. Dr. Miller wrote,
“The Academy’s greatest need today is
for a substantial endowment . . .” to sup-
port research.
There are 13 categories of membership,
one to fit every purse. The total mem-
bership as of June 30, 1960 was 2,317,
including 110 business and foundation
donors. The record does not show what
was paid by each category. Professional
scientists are found among the 214 fel-
lows of the Academy and to a lesser extent
among the 1,274 regular members.
Until recently the Academy had a Board
of Trustees composed of prominent, in-
terested citizens and a Council composed
of scientists. Now the Board and Council
are combined into a single Board of Trus-
tees of 27 members.
The Academy has a staff of professional
curators in the following subjects: aqua-
tic biology, astronomy, botany, entomology,
geology, herpetology, ichthyology, inver-
tebrate zoology, and ornithology and
mammalogy. The curator of aquatic
biology is also curator of the Steinhart
Aquarium and program host for the TV
series, “Science in Action.” The curator
of astronomy is also manager of the Mor-
rison Planetarium. There is also a cura-
tor of exhibits. Nearly all curators have
professional assistants. As of July 1, 1960,
Joel F. Gustafson became associate direc-
tor to relieve Dr. Miller of some of his
administrative burdens.
The Department of Entomology is one of
the largest in the Academy. It has some
2,500,000 mounted and labeled specimens
and more than a million awaiting attention.
The Academy received $90,000 from the
National Science Foundation to pay for
arrangement and improvement of the col-
lection over a three-year period; also a
grant of $18,000 to the curator for a
three-year study of the order Embioptera.
The curator of geology received a similar
grant to study fossil diatoms in certain
marine sediments and to train a graduate
student in such investigations.
The work of the professional staff re-
April, 1961
55
suits in scientific papers that appear in
appropriate journals or in the Proceed-
ings, Occasional Papers , or Memoirs of
the Academy. Their expeditions may
yield popular articles, as the recent story
of the African trip of Edward S. Ross for
the collection of insects (Hunting Africa’s
Smallest Game, National Geographic Maga-
zine 119, 406-419 (1961). The Academy
has an editor of scientific publications.
Turning to the activities of the Acad-
emy in public education, we find 2,600,000
people visiting the Academy in 1960 to
see the exhibits, including the aquarium
(free) and the planetarium (small charge
for admission). The aquarium is main-
tained by appropriations from the City of
San Francisco, which will pay for renova-
tions now badly needed. Dr. Miller is
proud of the fact that the planetarium star-
projector, a very complicated optical de-
vice, was made in the instrument shop of
the Academy at a time when it was im-
possible to obtain a Zeiss instrument. This
shop became so proficient in optical work
prior to World War II that it was able
to accept contracts for the production of
instruments for the Armed Forces.
From the information at hand it is not
clear what meetings are held at the Acad-
emy. There is, we read, a public relations
man on the staff who issues a monthly
newsletter, which “describes current de-
velopments within the Academy, announces
meeting schedules. . . .” etc. And in
another place we read that “the Hall of
Botany [now completed] will contain a
commodious, well-appointed room for
meetings of the Botany Club and other
special gatherings . . .”
The Student Section of the Academy
brought to it in 1960 “some 80 Bay area
junior and senior high school students”
who work after school and on Saturdays
and holidays on their own projects under
the direction of trained supervisors. The
Academy is also host to an annual Bay
Area Science Fair. Last year 350 exhibits
were shown to 88,000 visitors.
The Academy reaches the public outside
of its own domain in various ways. The
television program, previously mentioned,
has a commercial sponsor, makes some
money for the Academy, and reaches more
than 600,000 people. It has received an
extraordinary number of local and na-
tional awards, citations, and honors. An
artistic, well-illustrated popular magazine
called Pacific Discovery is published by
the Academy six times a year. Subtitled a
“Journal of Nature and Man in the Pacific
World,” it can now be obtained on many
newsstands. The curators and their as-
sistants answer many questions by corre-
spondence and appear as guest speakers
before many different organizations.
THE ANNUAL DINNER
OF JANUARY 19
Because of history-making weather
and traffic conditions on the night of
January 19, only about a third of those
registered for the Academy’s annual
dinner were able to attend. The deficit
in the annual budget is too large to con-
sider refunding all payments made in
advance, and some members have defi-
nitely stated that they desire no re-
funds. The matter has therefore been
placed on a voluntary basis. Non-
attendants who have already paid may
write the treasurer for partial or full
refunds as they wish; and voluntary
contributions of from one to four dol-
lars will be gladly accepted from regis-
trants who have not yet paid but wish
to do so.
Communications may be sent to Nor-
man F. Braaten, treasurer of WAS, in
care of the Academy offices at 1530
P St., N.W.
56
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
APRIL MEETING
(458th Meeting of the Washington Academy of Sciences)
SPEAKER
Francis J. Heyden, S.J., Director
Georgetown University Observatory
SUBJECT
Astronomy Looks to Its Future
DATE
Thursday, April 20, 1961, 8:15 p.m.
PLACE
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, Cosmos Club, 2170 Florida Ave., N.W .
Francis J. Heyden, S.J., was born in Buffalo,
N. Y. He received the A.B. degree from Wood-
stock College, and the M.A. and Ph.D. degrees
in astronomy from Harvard University. Following
early work as chief astronomer of the Manila Ob-
servatory and as a Harvard fellow, he came to
Georgetown University in 1945, and has been
director of the Georgetown Observatory since 1948.
He has participated in a number of solar eclipse
expeditions.
1961 BUDGET APPROVED
The following budget for 1961 was ap-
proved at the Board of Managers meeting
on February 21. (The itemization also in-
cludes a $50 increase that was approved at
the Board meeting of March 7.)
Anticipated income for 1961 is $12,070,
including $5,300 from dues. Any deficit
will be met by withdrawals from reserve
funds.
Journal $ T^OO1
Secretary 1,500
Treasurer 170
Meetings Committee 1,200
Committee on Encouragement of
Science Talent 250
Other committees 100
Directory reserve 1,000
Annual dinner and miscellaneous 400
A A AS (Academy conference) 20
Science Calendar 75
Joint Board on Science Education 500
Subtotal $12,515
Central office, through March 31 1,425
Total $13,940
1 Includes $1,600 for 1960 bills paid in 1961.
April, 1961
57
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical com-
mittees, civic activities, and marriages, births, and
other family news. Formal contributors have been
assigned for the systematic collection of news at
institutions employing considerable numbers of
Academy members ( see list on masthead) . How-
ever, for the bulk of the membership, we must
rely on individuals to send us news concerning
themselves and their friends. Contributions may
be addressed to Harold T. Cook, Associate Editor,
care of Agricultural Marketing Service, U. S.
Department of Agriculture, Rm. 3917 South Bldg.,
Washington 25, D. C.
APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY
On January 18, Ralph E. Gibson addressed
Naval Reserve Ordnance Company 5-9 on “The
Applied Physics Laboratory — Its Program and
Products.”
Dr. Gibson was one of three participants in a
recent R&D roundtable discussion sponsored by
the American Society for Public Administration,
the Society for the Advancement of Management,
and the Armed Forces Management Association.
His topic was, “The Role of Management in R&D
Manpower Utilization.”
Albert M. Stone, technical assistant to the
director, participated in the Strategy for Peace
Conference at Arden House, Harriman, N. Y., on
January 12-14. On December 15 he spoke on
“Plasma Dynamics Research” before Naval Ord-
nance Reserve Company 5-12.
Alfred J. Zmuda has been promoted to the
principal staff of APL.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
As part of a move involving several units of
the Survey, Norman F. Braaten and David G.
Knapp have relocated on the fifth floor of the
Longfellow Building, Rhode Island Avenue at
Connecticut. The move includes the Leveling
Branch and the Geomagnetism Branch, includ-
ing the IGY World Data Center A for Geomag-
netism, Seismology, and Gravity.
L. G. Simmons and Charles A. Whitten
attended a symposium February 6-8 on “Geodesy
in the Space Age.” Mr. Simmons presented a
paper, “Highly Accurate Geodimeter Triangula-
tion in the Cape Canaveral Area,” and Mr. Whit-
ten was a moderator for a Panel on Education
in Geodetic Sciences. The symposium was held
at the Division of Geodetic Science of Ohio
State University, Columbus.
Donald A. Rice attended a meeting of the
Geophysics Panel, Scientific Advisory Board,
USAF, held at Patrick AFB, Fla., on February
21-23.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
T. P. Thayer returned in January from Eu-
rope, after attending the International Geological
Congress and examining chromite deposits in the
region between Yugoslavia and Pakistan. In Yu-
goslavia he spent two weeks in the field under
the auspices of ICA and the Yugoslavia Geo-
logical Institute. Dr. Thayer also attended a
symposium on chromite sponsored by the CENTO
powers, which included visits to some of the
principal chromite districts in Turkey, Iran, and
Pakistan.
Dorothy Carroll is giving a course in pedol-
ogy at American University during the spring
semester.
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Mary Louise Robbins, Department of Bac-
teriology, attended a symposium on the molecular
basis of neoplasms at Anderson Memorial Hos-
pital, Houston, Tex., in the week of February 20.
B. D. VanEvera, president-elect of the Acad-
emy, represented WAS President Abelson on
the occasion of the recent Engineers and Sci-
entists Day.
HARRIS RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Milton Harris spoke before the Joint Meeting
of the American Chemical Society and the Amer-
ican Institute of Chemists at the Hotel New
Yorker on February 10. The title of his talk
was, “Is the Chemist Ready for the Scientific Ex-
plosion?” Dr. Harris also gave talks on this sub-
ject before the Western Chapter of the American
Institute of Chemists in Los Angeles on January
26, and before the Twin Cities Chapter in St.
Paul on January 31.
Dr. Harris also spoke before the Piedmont
(Ga.), Birmingham (Ala.) and New Orleans
chapters of the American Institute of Chemists
on March 7, 8 and 9, respectively. He discussed
problems dealing with the chemist and his role
in an expanding economy and the insecure world.
Alfred E. Brown has been appointed chair-
man of the new Science Committee of the Board
of Trade. The Science Committee will establish
and supervise the program of the recently-formed
Metropolitan Washington Science Bureau.
58
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Dr. Brown has been appointed a member of
the American Association for the Advancement
of Science Council Study Committee on Admin-
istration of Scientific Work. He also has been
elected a member of the Executive Committee of
the Science Manpower Commission.
Edmund M. Buras, Jr., discussed “Soviet
Artificial and Synthetic Fibers” at a dinner meet-
ing of the Washington Section, American Asso-
ciation of Textile Chemists & Colorists, on March
17. Mr. Buras told what fibers are produced by
the Soviet industry, how they compare with those
used in the United States, and what new de-
velopments could be expected in both consumer
items and high-performance textiles as a result
of Soviet research efforts.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
Academy members presenting papers at recent
meetings have included the following:
Alexander, S. N. : “NBS Experience with a
Man-Machine Research Facility” — Office of Na-
val Research and University of Michigan jointly
sponsoring a conference on “The Utilization of
Research in Statistical Theory,” University of
Florida, Gainesville, February 1 ; Bates, R. G. :
“Recent Developments in pH Measurements” —
Instrument Society of America, Charleston
(W. Va.) Section, January 9; Broida, H. P. :
“Spectroscopy of Condensed Non-Polar Gases
(Van der Waals Solids)” — University of Wash-
ington Physics Department, Seattle, January 10;
Eisenhart, C.: “Precision and Accuracy — Ex-
periment Design Aspects” — American Society for
Quality Control, Metropolitan Section, South Or-
ange, N. J., February 4; Herzfeld, C. M. :
“Philosophies of Science” — All Souls Unitarian
Church, Washington, February 7; Kushner,
L. H. : “The Structure of Metals” — Joint Board
on Science Education, Pomonkey (Md.) High
School, January 25; and “Dislocation in Crystals”
• — Joint Board on Science Education, Anacostia
(D. C.) High School, February 6; Madorsky,
S. L. : “Impressions of a Recent Trip to Russia”
— Naval Reserve Ordnance Company 5-10, Dahl-
gren, Va., January 16, and “Impressions of a
Trip to Russia” — American University Park Citi-
zens Association, Washington, February 6; Paf-
fenbarger, G. C. : “Some Clinical Applications
of Research Findings in Dental Materials” — -
American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, Chi-
cago, February 5, “Recent Advances in the Field
of Dental Materials” — Chicago Dental Society,
February 5-8, and “Clinical Research and the
Dentist” — Association of Dental Alumni of Co-
lumbia University, New York City, February 10;
Page, C. H.: “Bridges, Trees, Polyhedra, and
Electric Circuits” — Mathematics and Science
Club, Wheaton (Md.) High School, January 9;
Posner, A. S.: “The Crystal Chemistry of Den-
tal Tissues” — Pathodontia Section of the First
District Dental Society of New York, New York
City, January 9, and “The Biological Applica-
tions of X-Ray Diffraction” — Columbia Univer-
sity, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New
York City, February 2; Rhodes, Ida: “Me-
chanical Translation” — University of Pennsyl-
vania, Philadelphia, February 1; Taylor, J. K.:
“Chemistry — Profession or Skill?” Akron Sec-
tion, American Chemical Society, January 19;
Townsend, J. R. : “Standardization in United
States — Its History and Development” — Middle
East Standardizaiton Symposium, Cairo, Egypt,
between January 30 and February 6; Youden,
W. J.: “Elementary Statistical Design” — Society
of Plastics Engineers, Washington, January 25,
and “Systematic Errors in Physical Constants” —
Advanced Seminars on Experimental Designs-
held by the U. S. Army at the University of
Wisconsin, Madison, January 10.
S. N. Alexander participated on a panel dis-
cussion of Computer Installations, Sampling
Techniques, Input Equipment, Time Sharing,
Programming, held by the Advisory Committee
on Computers in Research of the National In-
stitutes of Health on February 9.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
Wade H. Marshall, chief of the Laboratory
of Neurophysiology, NIMH-NINDB, has been
made a foreign member of the Brazilian Academy
of Sciences, in recognition of his valuable con
tribution to science and helpful collaboration
with Brazilian research workers. Dr. Marshall
spent some time in 1958 as a guest worker and
in 1959 as a consultant at the Instituto de Bio-
fisica, Universidade do Brazil.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Justus C. Ward has been elected to chairman-
ship of the Interdepartmental Committee on Pest
Control. He discussed pesticide problems before
the California Extension Service Conference,
Asilomar, Calif., on January 18.
Ashley B. Gurney, Entomology Research Di
vision, spent the period February 9-19 in Puerto
Rico, collecting insects in company with Aaron
M. Nadler of New York City. Though the dry
season is traditionally poor for collecting, many
interesting species were secured in the Mariacao
Forest Reserve and in the vicinity of El Yunque.
One order not previously known from Puerto
Rico, the Zoraptera, was obtained.
Edson J. Hainhleton, assistant to the direc-
tor, In-charge Foreign Technical Programs, Plant
Pest Control Division, ARS, attended the annual
conference of personnel attached to the Regional
Insect Control Project working in the Near East
and Africa at Beirut, Lebanon, January 9-13.
From January 16-21 he served as a U. S. dele-
gate to the ninth session of the FAO Technical
Advisory Committee on Desert Locust Control,
Rome, Italy. Following the Rome meeting, Mr.
April, 1961
59
Hambleton visited the RICP post at Tripoli,
Libya, before participating in the first African
Pest Control Seminar held in Tunis, Tunisia,
from January 25 to February 3. This Seminal
was organized and conducted by personnel of
the Regional Insect Control Project in coopera-
tion with the International Cooperation Adminis-
tration and the U. S. Operations Mission to
Tunisia. Seven African countries participated.
The purpose of the Seminar was to stimulate the
development of more effective control organiza-
tions and better international cooperation in pest
control. Papers presented concerned role of
government and farmer in pest control, organiza-
tion of pest control, quarantine services, insect
survey, use of aircraft, and modern techniques.
Panel discussions were held on locust control,
pests of citrus, cotton, fruits and vegetables, and
stored products.
RETIREMENTS
The following Academy members retired in
1960: Allan M. Bateman, Edwin H. Behrend,
Doris H. Blake, Curtis P. Clausen. E. A. Eck-
hardt, James Gilluly, Oliver H. Gish, Eleanor B.
Knoff, Walter B. Lang, Atherton H. Mears,
Harold Morrison, and L. W. Parr.
DEATHS
Arthur T. Pienkowsky died December 31 in
Chicago, where he had been living since 1953.
He was 87 years old. He was graduated from
the University of Chicago in 1898 and taught in
Indiana and Illinois high schools from then until
1903. He was appointed laboratory assistant in
the Bureau of Standards in 1904, and was a
physicist when he retired in 1944. Following re-
tirement, he served as consultant to the Torsion
Balance Company.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
Where information as to the specific program
scheduled for meetings of Affiliated Societies was
not available sufficiently in advance to have been
included in the Calendar of Events for the March
issue of the Journal, it is carried below as a news
item. Additional items considered of general
interest are noted at appropriate points.
Acoustical Society of America,
Washington Chapter
The March meeting date was shifted from the
3rd to the 2nd Monday, at which time the mem-
bers heard Robert W. Young, U.S. Navy Elec-
tronics Laboratory, speak on “Piano Tunings and
Intonation of Various Wind Instruments.” This
event took place in the Exhibit Room, Industrial
Building, NBS.
The Society is currently engaged in polling
its membership with a view to selecting the
most favorable meeting time and place. It is
perhaps a commentary on the current Washing-
ton scene that they report “requests to meet
in almost every building of adequate size in the !
Metropolitan Area and on all nights,” with a i
desire for “plenty of parking.”
American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, Washington Section
The Division of Instrumentation and Telemetry
held its discussion on March 13, rather than |
March 6, as first announced, and added to the
program a second paper on “Rocket Propulsion
Measurements.”
American Society of Civil Engineers,
National Capital Section
At a luncheon meeting on February 28, Wil-
liam E. Finley, National Capital Planning Com-
mission, spoke on “Metro — 2,000 A.D.,” an
estimate as to what our cities will be like m
another several decades.
As a special feature of the annual dinner
meeting, Ivan A. Nestigen, HEW, discussed
programs of his Department, with particular at-
tention to water pollution control, hospital and 1
school construction, and atmospheric pollution.
A special committee of the Section has recom- :
mended the names of Waldo E. Smith and W. O. ,
Hiltabidle, both past presidents, for considera- i
tion as nominees for national director, District f
5. Members will ballot shortly.
A number of local sections of national engi-
neering societies are working toward the develop- 1 1
ment of a United Engineering Center, comparable i J
in some ways to the new ACS building here in
Washington, in support of which members of 1
the various engineering groups are urged to i
contribute.
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
The sixth annual Gas Turbine Conference
and Products Exhibit, a joint effort of the Gas
Turbine Power Division of ASME and the De-
partment of Defense, was held at the Shoreham •
Hotel, March 5-9. A wide spectrum of technical i:
papers and exhibits, covering recent progress
in gas turbines for aircraft, automotive, and
marine situations, was available.
Botanical Society of Washington
On March 7, L. B. Smith spoke to the Society .
on the research and service activities of the *
Department of Botany of the Smithsonian. A .
tour of the laboratories of the Division of Radia-
tion and Organisms was arranged by William r<
Klein.
Chemical Society of W ashington
At a Board of Managers meeting on February j
23, an ad hoc Committee on Topical Groups was j
60
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
established to implement the formation of
topical groups within the Society. The Special
Committee on Employment outlined its plans to
establish a file of persons seeking employment,
and of employers having jobs to be filled. The
Board endorsed a proposed code of professional
conduct, scheduled for consideration on March
26 by the national Council of the American
Chemical Society.
At the Society’s annual Hillebrand Award
Dinner on March 9, Frank T. McClure of the
Applied Physics Laboratory received the Hille-
brand Prize for 1960 for his contributions to a
knowledge of solid propellant combustion. Dr.
McClure then addressed the Society on the
subject, “Rockets, Resonance, and Physical
Chemistry.”
Entomological Society of Washington
Our contact reports that Reece I. Sailer is now
established in the European Parasite Laboratory,
Seine, France, where he is investigating insects
that may be introduced into the United States
as agents of biological control. Ashley B. Gurney
visited Puerto Rico during February and reported
on his collecting activities at the March meeting
of the Society.
Geological Society of Washington
M. F. Kane spoke on “Relationship between
Isostasy and Geologic Structure in Clark County,
Nevada,” Augusto Gansser on “Salt-domes and
Mud-volcanoes,” and D. M. Pinckney on “Veins
and Hydrothermal Alteration in the Boulder
Batholith, Montana” at the March 8 meeting.
Two weeks later, D. B. Krinsley, USGS, dealt
with “Limnological Investigations at Centrum
Lake, N.E. Greenland,” Roland Brinkman, of
the University of Bonn, with “Deformation of
Fossils and Rocks,” and Edwin Roedder, US’GS,
with “Depression of the Freezing Point in Fluid
Inclusions.”
Helminthological Society of Washington
A varied program was available to the Society
at its March 15 meeting at NIH, in Bethesda,
including papers on the parasitic nematode Nippo-
strongylus and on helminthology in Australia
(R. I. Sommerville, Sydney), on Trichinella
(L. J. Olivier, NIH), on Trypanosoma (W. F. Can-
trell, NIH), on cultivation of Entamoeba (L. S.
Diamond, NIH), and on schistosomiasis in
India.
Insecticide Society of Washington
“The Foreign Quarantine Entomology Program
of the Public Health Service,” by John H.
I Hughes, PHS, and “New Problems in Disinsec-
! tization of Modern Aircraft,” by R. A. Fulton,
USDA, constituted the March 15 program of the
Society.
We are informed that Martin Jacobson, USDA,
! April, 1961
has been given a $300 award for his outstanding
work on the gypsy moth sex lure, and that Sam
Gertler has retired from the Pesticide Chemicals
Research Branch, USDA, after 36 years of service,
receiving a letter of commendation from Secretary
Benson. William E. Bickley, University of Mary-
land, has been elected president of the American
Mosquito Control Association.
Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
One of the more comprehensive and informative
bulletins distributed by societies affiliated with
the Washington Academy is that of the IRE.
Much of its March issue honors four new Sec-
tion Fellows: Robert J. Adams, Richard F. J.
Filipowsky, Delmer C. Ports, and Gustave
Shapiro.
1 he Section boasts an impressive array of no
less than 17 professional group chapters, some
of which from time to time sponsor the regular
sectional meetings or hold sessions of their own.
In March alone, there were four such events:
on March 8, the group on Component Parts
heard a discussion of “Solid State Ceramic De-
vices”; on March 14, the group on Microwave
Theory and Technics dealt with “Microwave
Components for the 1.5-3 Millimeter Wave
Region”; on March 16, the group on Bio-Medical
Electronics considered “Automatic Monitoring
of Airborne Biological Products”; and on March
23, the group on Antennas and propagation took
ap “Television Transmitting Antennas.”
The Second National Symposium on Human
Factors in Electronics, noted in the March
Journal, plans to treat man-computer relation-
ships, human factors in air traffic systems, in
ship navigation and communication, and informa-
tion and communication in electronic system
maintenance.
An editorial on the final page of the Section
bulletin reports concern on the part of engineers
as a group, voiced by A. H. Flax of Brooklyn
Polytech, that loose usage of the terms “scientist”
and “engineer” has been responsible for a loss
of stature by the latter in the public mind, and
a decline in engineering college enrollments.
L. V. Berkner, national president of IRE, was
the principal speaker at the annual dinner meet-
ing of the Washington Chapter on February 11.
He spoke on “Meeting the Challenge of the Space
Age — Professional Development through the
Institute of Radio Engineers.”
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
If we may judge by the bulletin “Current
Medical Events,” scarcely a day goes by without
some event of interest to the medical personnel
of the city — 26 are noted for March, as many
as five on a single day.
61
Society for Experimental Biology and Med-
icine, District of Columbia Section
No meetings of the S’ection are to be held in
April or May; the annual dinner is currently
scheduled for June 1.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Events which will take place, so far as we
can determine at the time of writing, subsequent
to the appearance of the Journal are noted below.
Where possible, the nature of the program is
indicated ; in many instances the entry merely
notes date and place of a regularly scheduled
meeting of the organization named. Last minute
changes in time and place, or emergency can-
cellations, may in certain instances alter the
situation.
April 4 Botanical Society of Washington
The Society plans a special, early-evening trip
to the National Arboretum in place of its regular
formal sessions. Detailed schedule will be sent
to members prior to that time.
April 5 — Washington Society of Engineers
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
April 6 — Entomological Society of Washing-
ton
Room 43, U. S. National Museum.
April 10 — American Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
Silver Certificate Night; nine members, includ-
ing five members of the Washington Academy
of Sciences, will be honored for 25 years’ mem-
bership in the Society. P. C. Rossin, Universal-
Cyclops Steel Co., speaks on “Infab Inert At-
mosphere Fabrication Facility.”
AAUW building, 2401 Virginia Avenue. N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
April 10 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Regular section meeting, sponsored by the
Professional Group on Electron Devices.
April 11 — American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
April 11 — American Society of Civil En-
gineers, National Capital Section
John Wesley Powell Auditorium. 8:00 p.m.
April 11 — Institute of Radio Engineers.
Washington Section
Meeting of Professional Group on Microwave
Theory and Technics.
April 12 — Geological Society of Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
April 13 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
Meeting in area of Division of Applied Me-
chanics.
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
April 13 — Chemical Society of Washington
Linus Pauling will speak on “The Structure of
Electron Deficient Substances.”
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
April 14 — Philosophical Society of Washing-
ton
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
April 17 — Acoustical Society of America,
Washington D.C. Chapter
April 17 — Society of American Military En-
gineers, Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K N.W., 12:00 noon.
April 18 — Anthropological Society of Wash-
ington
William Caudill, NIH, will speak on “An-
thropology and Psychoanalysis: Some Theoretical
Issues.”
Room 43, U.S. National Museum, 8:15 p.m.
April 18 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Meeting of Professional Group on Antennas
and Propagation for its regular lecture.
April 19 — Insecticide Society of Washington
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
April 19 — Washington Society of Engineers
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
APRIL 20— WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF
SCIENCES
April 25 — American Society of Civil Engi-
neers, National Capital Section
Luncheon meeting at YWCA, 12:00 noon.
April 25 — Society of American Bacteriolo-
gists, Washington Branch
Sternberg Auditorium, Walter Reed Army
Medical Center, 8:00 p.m.
April 26 — Geological Society of Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
April 27 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
Meeting in division of metals engineering.
L. M. Kushner will speak on “Imperfections and
Mechanical Properties,” and H. E. Frankel on
“Down to Earth Space Problems.”
PEPCO Auditorium. 8:00 p.m.
April 28 — Philosophical Society of Washing-
ton
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
62
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
THE BROWNSTONE TOWER
Progress in science
takes place primarily
in the minds of in-
dividuals. To stimu-
late fruitful solitary
thinking, communi-
cation of various
kinds among sci-
entists is necessary.
Since World War II I
have been engaged in
assisting scientists to
communicate among
themselves. As ex-
ecutive secretary of the Division of Biology and
Agriculture, National Academy of Sciences —
National Research Council, I am concerned prin-
cipally with communications in the field of sci-
entific strategy, or policy, usually through meet-
ings of committees, conferences, or symposia.
You will be interested, I think, in the recent
annual meeting of the members of the National
Research Council, on March 9-11. It is an ex-
ample of an unusually stimulating interdisci-
plinary conference in Washington. Limited in at-
tendance and not covered by the press, this
annual meeting is not as well known to the
local scientific community as is the annual spring
meeting of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Research Council, as the name
implies, is in part a council of more than 275
members who represent the national scientific
societies of the United States or the scientific or-
ganizations within the Federal Government’s de-
partments. Some, called members at large, have
no liaison responsibilities, and all, as experi-
enced scientists, are expected to speak their
own minds on questions of policy. The National
Research Council is also the operating arm of
the National Academy of Sciences, and as such
enlists the services of thousands of scientists
and technologists who serve without financial
compensation on NAS'-NRC committees. The
members (council) of the National Research
Council have the opportunity, particularly at
annual meetings, to influence the scope and
character of the committee activities of NAS-
NRC.
Prior to 1958 the members of the National
Research Council had never met in plenary ses-
sion; instead, each of the eight substantive divi-
sions of the Council held its own annual meet-
ing, which was attended by the members affiliated
with it. It seemed that there might be a better
way to exchange ideas among the officers, mem-
bers, and staff of the Council, and in 1958 the
members met for the first time as a single
body in a three-day conference, within which
an afternoon and evening were devoted to simul-
taneous, separate meetings and dinners of the
eight divisions. This plan worked so well that
it became the pattern, with slight modifications,
for the subsequent annual meetings.
With the above background in mind you will
be able, I hope, to understand the nature of
the recent conference. It was attended by about
200 members of the National Research Council
from all parts of the United States. The density
of geographical distribution of members is not
uniform, but is inversely related to distance
from Washington, probably for reasons of econ-
omy and convenience of access to NAS-NRC.
Many representatives of societies live in the
Washington area, and nearly all the Government
liaison members live here. Consequently a num-
ber of members of the Washington Academy are
also members of the National Research Council;
for example, Past President A. T. McPherson
represents the National Bureau of Standards,
and Past President Waldo L. Schmitt repre-
sents the Society of Systematic Zoology. Asso-
ciate Editor Russell B. Stevens represents the
American Phytopathological Society, and Robert
W. Krauss, the subject of my previous Brown-
stone Tower, represents the American Society
of Plant Physiologists. A few of the members
of the National Research Council are also mem-
bers of the National Academy of Sciences, and
Detlev W. Bronk, president of the Rockefeller
Institute, is the head of both the Council and
the Academy.
The recent Annual Meeting of the National
Research Council opened at noon on March 9
with a luncheon served by a caterer on rows of
tables covering the floor of the Great Hall, or ro-
tunda, of the Academy building on Constitution
Ave. Because a member of the National Research
Council serves at least three years, and often
by reappointment for longer periods, I saw
many familiar faces at the tables and began
then the pleasant duty of meeting all of the
47 members of my division who were present,
including five new members.
After lunch all the members gathered in the
Lecture Room to hear the opening address by
President Bronk, who never fails to hold his
audience in admiring attention. Then followed
two illustrated talks on instrumentation and sci-
entific significance of meteorological satellites;
the first by William G. S'troud of NASA, and
the second by Harry Wexler of the Weather
Bureau. The latter is a member of the Wash-
ington Academy and a recent recipient of one
of the National Civil Service League’s Annual
Career Civil Service Awards.
The purpose of this and other reports at
the plenary sessions was to acquaint the mem-
April, 1961
63
bers of the Council with the current status of
complex scientific and engineering projects that
are in some way of interest to everyone. Thus
the members are lifted out of their usual sphere
of interests and are given a new and exciting
perspective.
After a reception and buffet dinner in the
Great Hall, the members returned to the Lec-
ture Room and heard J. B. Wiesner, Assistant
to the President for Science and Technology,
talk about his responsibilities as an adviser
to President Kennedy and as chairman of the
President’s Science Advisory Committee. The
evening ended with an illustrated talk by Harry
Hess on the Mohole, with an up-to-the-minute
report of success in the first attempt to drill
into the bottom of the deep ocean. This of
course is preliminary to a later attempt to drill
through the crust of the earth to the mantle.
On the morning of March 10 each member was
free to attend one of three simultaneous meet-
ings in accordance with his preference. The
titles were (1) The Role of Mathematics in
Other Sciences, (2) What Should the Public
Understand about Science? and (3) Problems
Created by the Rapid Growth of Science. Dis-
tinguished scientists were selected as chairmen
of these meetings (J. B. Rosser, Paul Weiss, and
Saunders MacLane, respectively) and interested,
articulate persons were asked in advance to
prime the discussions. Thus all members were
encouraged to express themselves on one or
another of these topics.
In the afternoon eight separate division meet-
ings were held. It was my duty to attend the
one in Biology and Agriculture, in which, for
the first time, a small symposium was featured,
on the undesirable side effects of pest control
in agriculture, forestry, public health, and wild-
life management. The intention of the Inter-
national Union of Biological Sciences to develop
an International Biological Program also was
discussed. It is to be a planned program re-
quiring international collaboration over a period
of years on biological projects that cannot be
efficiently advanced in any other way.
In the evening our trend toward scientific
integration was continued by the holding of a
joint dinner of the Divisions of Biology and
Agriculture and Chemistry and Chemical Tech-
nology. Dr. Bronk attended our dinner. The
after-dinner speaker was Farrington Daniels,
vice president of the National Academy of Sci-
ences, who talked on his experiences in India,
Southeast Asia, and South America on missions
of good will for the Academy. How, he asked
himself, can native science and technology be
developed in these countries so as to make pos-
sible a standard of living for their peoples ap-
proaching that which we now enjoy? Again
our members were stimulated to think about
science as a world-wide activity requiring inter-
national cooperation.
On Saturday morning, March 11, the mem-
bers assembled in the Lecture Room to hear
the chairman of each of the eight divisions talk
briefly about the principal activities and plans
of his division; also to hear the chairman of
each of the Friday morning sessions characterize
the discussion at his meeting. At one point
during the morning, Alan T. Waterman, direc-
tor of the National Science Foundation, talked
on the relationships between NAS-NRC and NSF.
Dr. Bronk opened the Saturday morning session
and presided throughout, giving the audience
interesting information and comment on the
subjects being discussed. The meeting was re-
markable for its great diversity, its important
ideas, its good humor, and its brilliance. I wish
all members of the Washington Academy could
have enjoyed it and profited by it.
— Frank L. Campbell
ACADEMY ACTIV ITIES
FEBRUARY BOARD MEETING
The Board of Managers held its 535th meeting
on February 21 at the National Academy of
Sciences, with President Abelson presiding.
The minutes of the 534th meeting were ap-
proved. Dr. Specht indicated that Dr. Seeger’s
report of the Committee on Science Education,
presented at that meeting, had been inadvertently
omitted but would be added to the permanent
minutes.
Committee appointments for 1961 were an-
nounced. (See March Journal, pages 34-35.)
For the Policy and Planning Committee, Dr.
Campbell presented a report containing the fol-
lowing recommendations, which were adopted by
the Board after considerable discussion:
(1) An effort should be made to build up
membership in the Academy before it is recom-
mended that dues be increased. The definition
of “scientific attainment” should be broadened
to include the attainment of leadership in the
societies affiliated with the Academy, as evidenced
by election to office, particularly to the presidency
of such societies.
(2) It should be suggested to affiliated societies
that they be represented on the Board of Man-
agers by their president, president-elect, or past
president.
(3) Before it is recommended that dues be
increased, the Journal of the Academy should
be improved. To give the Journal greater support
under a balanced budget, the cost of central
office services should be reduced or eliminated.
Specifically, the Academy’s full-time employee
64
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
should be released as of March 31, and a
volunteer executive secretary should be appointed,
to serve if possible without paid assistance.
(4) The Board of Managers should meet on
the first Tuesday of each month in which the
Academy meets, instead of on the third Tuesday.
The budget for 1961 was adopted in the amount
of $13,890, this figure including $1,425 for opera-
tion of the central office through March 31. (See
details elsewhere in this issue.)
Dr. Frenkiel discussed plans of the Meetings
Committee for the coming year. He indicated
that it was hoped to emphasize presentations with
general society interests, and to consider contro-
versial subjects and such interdisciplinary discus-
sions as would arise over overlapping areas of
interest in science. The use of discussion panels
will be explored. Further, special meetings may
be held in addition to the regularly scheduled
meetings.
Dr. Abelson, speaking for Dr. Robbins of the
Membership Committee, reported on plans to
increase the membership during the current
year by as many as three to four hundred indi-
viduals, to offset the disadvantages under which
the Academy is now operating.
The Secretary presented for First Reading
the names of 18 candidates for membership.
The Board approved the awarding of certificates
of merit, at the Academy meeting of March 16,
to 21 high school students of the Metropolitan
Area, for their achievements as winners or
runners-up in the 1960 National Science Talent
Search (see March issue, page 36).
Following the second reading of their names,
the following persons were elected to member-
ship in the Academy: Calvin Golumbic. Reino
W. Hakala, Ralph Klein. Herbert L. Ley, Jr.,
Joseph B. Morris, Austin C. Polins. Preston T.
Talbert, George C. Turrell. and Elizabeth G.
Frame.
Reporting on the Journal Mr. Detwiler an-
nounced that Lawrence A. Wood had agreed to
serve as one of the associate editors. The Board
approved the appointment.
Speaking for himself and the treasurer, Dr.
Specht indicated that in future, requests for
resignation by members in good standing would
be acted upon without referral to the Board.
Dr. Abelson then presented the guest of the
evening, Robert C. Miller, director of the Cali-
fornia Academy of Sciences, who informally
discussed the history, organization, and activities
of this group.
MARCH BOARD MEETING
The Board of Managers held its 536th meeting
on March 7 at the National Academy of Sciences,
with President Abelson presiding. The minutes
of the 535th meeting were approved with correc-
tions.
On recommendation of the Executive Commit-
tee, the budget of the Committee on Encourage-
ment of Science Talent was increased by $50.
to a total of $250.
Dr. Frenkiel discussed the forthcoming gen
eral meeting on March 16, at which members of
the Junior Academy would be honored; he
indicated that following the formal lectures bv
the speakers of the evening, various physicists
and biologists would be asked to join in an
informal discussion.
For the Membership Committee, Dr. Robbins
presented for first reading the names of three
candidates for membership.
Dr. Robbins indicated that steps were being
taken to establish a new Membership Committee
Panel on Engineers; also, that the Mathematics
Panel would be expected to process nominations
of teachers through the recommendation of
Keith Johnson, who will be made an additional
member of the Panel. A discussion of proposed
changes in the membership nomination form was
carried over to the next Board meeting.
At the request of Dr. McPherson of the Com-
mittee on Grants-in-Aid, the Board approved an
award of $109 to Michael S’ouders for a research
project.
The Board approved a recommendation by Dr.
Campbell of the Policy and Planning Committee,
to the effect that the retiring president of the
Academy should be a member of the Board in
the year following his presidency. The matter
will be brought to the membership for approval
at election time.
Dr. Brenner described plans of the Committee
on Encouragement of Science Talent for the
dinner and certificate presentations at the March
16 meeting, and asked for volunteers to help
sponsor the dinner.
Dr. Taylor presented a report on operations
of the Joint Board on Science Education, aris-
ing out of the current grant from the National
Science Foundation. Dr. Taylor was compli-
mented on his achievements with the grant pro-
gram; he responded by pointing out that much
of the success of this program was due to the
active cooperation of WAS members who gave
much time and thought to the prosecution of
the work.
Dr. Taylor announced that at the instigation
of Raymond Seeger, a committee of women in
science had been set in motion to stimulate the
adoption of science careers by girls, and to ad-
vocate the teaching of science in girls’ schools.
Chairman of the committee is Katherine Way,
who welcomes any further volunteer assistance.
Following the second reading of their names.
April, 1961
65
the following persons were elected to member-
ship in the Academy: Louis S. Baron, Edward
Hacskaylo, Thomas J. Henneberry, James L. Hil-
ton, Miss Etsuko Osawa, Robert 0. Belsheim,
John P. Craven, Robert M. Rivello, Raul Rod-
riguez, Cecil T. Wint, James W. Butler, Theodore
A. Litovitz, Paul E. Ritt, Carl F. Romney, Wil-
liam J. Thaler, Marvin Zelen, Pauline Diamond,
and Mrs. Tempie R. Franklin.
The treasurer asked that all officers and com-
mittee chairmen authorized to obligate budgeted
funds should have bills sent to themselves, ap-
prove them if proper, and forward to him for
more prompt handling and payment.
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
A new building at Catholic University to
house the Department of Biology is ex-
pected to he ready for occupancy before the
end of the academic year. It is a four-story
building with a greenhouse and related facili-
ties on the roof. There will be extensive ani-
mal house facilities and specially equipped lab-
oratories for animal physiology on the top floor.
Laboratories for plant physiology and bacterio-
logy will be located on the first floor. There
will also be a herbarium, teaching laboratories,
media and transfer rooms, a large lecture room,
library, and office-laboratories for staff members.
This Nation’s first measurement science
center opened at George Washington Uni-
versity the week of February 2. The program
was organized by the school of engineering in
cooperation with the National Bureau of Stand-
ards and assistance of the Martin Company of
Baltimore. The Center will provide a curriculum
in measurement science. About one third of
the enrollees are graduate students from gov-
ernment and industry. The remainder are un-
dergraduates in engineering. Eight courses in
metrology will be offered which can be credited
toward the requirements for an engineering
certificate or degrees of bachelor, master, or doc-
tor of science.
A summary of United States earthquakes
in 1958 has been published hv the Coast and
Geodetic Survey. It describes earthquake ac-
tivity in the United S’tates and dependencies
in 1958, and summarizes the earthquake loca-
tions obtained by processing reports from
many foreign and domestic seismograph stations.
This information is useful in mapping seismic
areas and promoting public safety through bet-
ter understanding of earthquake phenomena.
The publication includes a list of Coast and
Geodetic Survey and cooperating teleseismic
stations.
A Center for Research in Child Develop-
ment is to he established at the National
Institutes of Health. It was authorized by the
Public Health Service Surgeon General in a
memorandum dated February 17. The new Cen- L
ter will be responsible for a program to en- ;
courage and stimulate development and ex-
ploratory research in basic biological, behavioral, j
and clinical sciences related to the phenomena
and health problems of childhood and adoles-
cence.
Larc, the fastest and most powerful ultra-
high-speed calculator available to the De-
partment of Defense, has successfully com-
pleted acceptance tests at the Applied
Mathematics Laboratory of the U. S. Navy
David Taylor Model Basin. It is capable of
storing 3 million 12 digit numbers or 3 million (
computer words on high-speed magnetic drums, j,
and 30,000 words or numbers in ultra-high-speed
core storage. It can perform 250,000 multipli-
cations, additions, subtractions, or comparisons I
per second.
A portable reflectance spectrophotometer,
the first of its kind, to measure surface re-
flectance of soils and vegetation in natural
environment is being tested by the U. S.
Army Engineer Research and Development
Laboratories, Fort Belvoir, Va. Reflectance
data obtained by this instrument has many ap-
plications to engineering, mineral, and water
surveys as well as military problems. This in- j
strument makes it possible to examine soil and I
vegetation in an undisturbed state. Previously I
samples had to be taken to the laboratory for
measurements. The reflectance properties of {
undisturbed and disturbed samples are often
markedly different. Reflectance data obtained in
the field with this instrument have provided
accurate information on which to base selection
of film filter combinations with optimum char-
acteristics for registering a desired tone contrast
between objects in photographs.
Measurement of natural gamma ray radi-
ation of raw (grease) wool is a promising
new method for predicting wool shrinkage.
The gamma rays are emitted by a natural iso-
tope, potassium-40, that occurs mostly in the
suint (dried sweat) of raw wool. Research by
USDA scientists R. Kulwich, L. Feinstein, R. !
W. Decker, and C. Golumbic of AMS and
Mary E. Hourihan and C. E. Terrill of ARS
has shown that this radiation can be measured
with a newly-developed, highly sensitive low-
level gamma ray detector. The measurement
would indicate the amount of impurities (grease,
suint, and dirt) which are removed in scouring
and account for most of the shrinkage. The
present method of predicting the yield of clean
wool involves scouring and weighing small
samples. The new method would be faster since
no special preparation of the wool would be
66
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
necessary. The wool sample would merely be
placed in a fiber drum for analysis.
Development of a new electrostatic de-
vice to speed measurement of the fineness of
wool-fibre sections has been announced by
the U. S. Department of Agriculture. The
device was developed under a contract by H. G.
Neil of the Special Instruments Laboratory,
Knoxville, Tenn., in collaboration with wool
fiber technologist Mary E. Hourihan of the De-
partment's Beltsville Research Center. The new
instrument arranges the fibers in parallel so
they can be measured more easily and faster
than by present methods. The aligned fiber
sections, mounted in oil, are measured in-
directly under a microprojector that produces an
image larger than the actual fibers of a standard
magnification. The images cast by the projector
are measured quickly with a wedge scale. Hav-
ing the fibers aligned makes it possible to
measure the fibers more accurately and with a
minimum turning of the wedge scale.
The severe snowy winter that the Wash-
ington area has recently experienced was
anticipated by Weather Bureau scientists
early in December. They noted that wind pat-
terns around the Northern Hemisphere were re-
shaping themselves and predicted that they would
bring the two necessary ingredients for a cold
and snowy winter if they persisted. The first
ingredient was a supply of cold air from Canada.
The second was a flow of warmer moist air
from the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean.
The first of these conditions by itself would re-
sult in cold dry weather. The second by itself
would cause warm, cloudy, rainy weather. The
two together in proper combination would
cause cold snowy weather. That is what has
happened in the Washington and Northeast areas
since early December.
Filterable viruses, invisibly minute semi-
organisms which cause some of the most
devastating epidemics, usually are latent in
human tissues, apparently causing no harm.
They may remain thus for years, then suddenly
turn vicious. This is stressed in a report on cur-
I rent concepts and advances in virus research
published in the latest annual report of the Smith-
sonian Institution.
The viruses suddenly can mutate to form new
strains and cause different disease symptoms.
! They may have quite different effects depending
on the age, genetics, state of nutrition, and bal-
ance of the hormones of the host. “Conversion of
a virus from a latent to an active state,” says the
report, “may be effected by seasonal factors. For
instance, there is a tendency for polio to occur
in the summertime, or for sun and wind, somehow
related to the seasons, to influence the emergence
of herpetic lesions. There are also hormonal fac-
tors, such as those associated with pregnancy,
that influence whether or not polio will result in
paralysis.”
“X-ray Protection up to Three Million
Volts,” National Bureau of Standards Hand-
book 76, was issued in February and is avail-
able from the Superintendent of Documents at 25
cents. This 52-page pamphlet sets forth stand-
ards of safety established by Subcommittee 3 of
the National Committee on Radiation Protection
and Measurement. It contains data and recom-
mendations pertaining to all persons involved,
including the manufacturers of the apparatus,
designers and builders of the rooms housing it,
the individuals in charge of installations, and the
persons actually using the equipment. The Com-
mittee’s basic philosophy on X-ray protection, ac-
cording to a statement in the preface, is the same
as expressed 30 years ago, namely, that unneces-
sary radiation exposure should always be avoided
and all exposure held to the minimum compat-
ible with practical clinical requirements.
A record-breaking total of 75,000 new
chemical compounds was reported by the
world’s chemists in 1960. About a fourth of
the new chemicals — 19,000 — were made by Ameri-
can scientists; Iron Curtain chemists reported
approximately 9,000 new chemicals, while the
Japanese accounted for almost 7,000 compounds.
Other top chemical-producing countries include
England and Germany.
The first cumulative index of Index Chemicus,
published by the Institute for Scientific Informa-
tion, Philadelphia, marks the first time that this
information has been reported so promptly. The
index was prepared by electronic computing
equipment in record-breaking time — a historic
achievement in chemical documentation. Prior
to the introduction of Index Chemicus in August
1960, chemists had to wait from two to five years
to obtain this same information from conventional
abstracting services. Now the information is avail-
able within 60 days.
Secretary of Agriculture Orville L. Free-
man will open the OPEDA Science Fair
Exhibit on April 26 in the Agriculture Depart-
ment patio, at 9:30 a.m. Sponsored by the Organi-
zation of Professional Employees of the Depart-
ment of Agriculture, the exhibit will provide an
opportunity for about 50 Washington Area high
school students to put their scientific skills and
ingenuity on public display following the science
fairs in their own areas. At this fourth annual
event, science teachers of the area are particularly
invited to bring their classes to visit the exhibit,
which will be on view through April 28.
April, 1961
67
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
Philosophical Society of Washington
Anthropological Society of Washington
Biological Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
Entomological Society of Washington
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Columbia Historical Society
Botanical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Washington Society of Engineers
American Institute of Electrical Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Helminthological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
American Society for Metals
International Association for Dental Research
Institute of the Aerospace Sciences
American Meteorological Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Acoustical Society of America
American Nuclear Society
Lawson M. McKenzie
Regina Flannery Herzfeld
Herbert Friedmann
John L. Torgesen
William E. Bickley
Alexander Wetmore
Margaret D. Foster
Frederick O. Coe
U. S. Grant, III
Harold T. Cook
G. Flippo Gravatt
Howard S. Rappleye
William A. Geyger
William G. Allen
Doys A. Shorb
Mary Louise Robbins
Robert D. Huntoon
Douglas E. Parsons
Kathryn Knowlton
John A. Bennett
Gerhard Brauer
Francois N. Frenkiel
Jack Thompson
Milton S. Schechter
Richard K. Cook
Urner Liddel
68
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Volume 51
APRIL 1961
No. 4
CONTENTS
Page
Geology and Geologists in Fiction 49
Academy Honors Twenty-one Students 53
The California Academy of Sciences 54
APRIL MEETING 57
1961 Budget 57
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 58
Affiliated Societies 60
Calendar of Events 62
The Browns tone Tower 63
Academy Activities 64
Science and Development 66
Washington Academy of Sciences
1530 — P St., N.W.
Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
2nd Class Postage
Paid at
Washington, D. C.
L I & R ARY Of ARNOLD
AR60RLTUM
22 DIVINITY A V £
CAMBRIDGE ZB MASS
.
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
SCIENCES
Vol. 51 • No. 5
MAY 1961
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Lloyd N. Ferguson, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
OFFICERS OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
President: Philip H. Abelson, Geophysical Laboratory
President-Elect : Benjamin D. Van Evera, George Washington University
Secretary: Heinz Specht, National Institutes of Health
Treasurer : Norman F. Braaten, Coast and Geodetic Survey
On the Problems of Mineralogy *
V. M. Goldschmidt
Translated by Gunnar Kullerud
Today [September 28, 1914], as I am
about to assume my new position as pro-
fessor at the University of Oslo, I consider
it appropriate to choose for a lecture a
topic of a rather comprehensive nature.
When one is about to start a new chapter
in his life work, he realizes the necessity
of looking away from the special investiga-
* Published here completely in English for the
first time, this is primarily an address of his-
torical interest to earth scientists; secondarily,
an account of the early development of miner-
alogy that should be informative to all scientists
unacquainted with the subject. At the sugges-
tion of George T. Faust, U.S. Geological Survey,
the address has been translated from Norwegian
( Naturen 38, 321-334 (1914)) into English by
Gunnar Kullerud of the Geophysical Laboratory,
Carnegie Institution of Washington.
V. M. Goldschmidt (1888-1947) was noted
for his contributions to geochemistry. He was
educated in Oslo, took his doctor’s degree in
1911, and became a professor in the University
and head of its Mineralogical Institute in 1914,
an event commemorated by the address here
translated. In it he discussed what earth scien-
tists now call the facies principle, having to do
with deductions on the distribution of minerals
according to the laws of thermodynamics applied
to their formation under various conditions of
temperature and pressure. His address is fre-
quently cited with reference to this mineralogi-
cal phase rule.
Professor Goldschmidt left Oslo for Gottingen
in 1929. There he published an important series
of papers entitled, “Geochemische Verteilungs-
gesetze der Elemente.” He returned to Oslo in
1935, then was a refugee during World War II,
working in Sweden and England. Before he
died in 1947 he had been at work on a summa-
tion in English of his scientific experience, to
be published as a book. This work was com-
pleted and edited by Alex Muir. Entitled “Geo-
chemistry,” this 730-page book was published
in 1954 by the Clarendon Press of Oxford. Of
it a reviewer wrote, “This large and handsome
volume is a fitting tribute to the memory of
Victor Moritz Goldschmidt and his pioneer work
in geochemistry.” — Ed.
tions of the day and feels the need of a
general orientation about the problems
that demand a solution and the working
tools that we have at our disposal.
We shall attempt to present the status
of mineralogical science; and try to shed
some light on the existing problems, on
the working techniques that are employed,
and on the results that so far have been
obtained.
The historical evolution of mineralogy
has much in common with that of the
other natural sciences; mineralogy started
as a purely descriptive science.
The different minerals that were found
in nature were described in the same man-
ner as plants or animals. It was quite
natural at first that attention was primarily
directed to the outer features of the min-
erals, and especially to their regular outer
form which is limited by plane, polygonal
faces. Almost all minerals form crystals,
and it was early noticed that their outer
forms are very characteristic for the dif-
ferent mineral species. Therefore, it be-
came possible to draw conclusions concern-
ing the identity of a mineral from its crys-
tal faces.
For this reason it is not fortuitous that
the rapid growth of mineralogy as a true
science coincided with the time when
the shapes of crystals were found to con-
form to the laws of geometry through the
fundamental investigations by Renee Haiiy
at the end of the 18th century.
The numerous investigations of the geo-
metrical forms of crystals led to the con-
struction of a special type of measuring
instrument, the so-called goniometer. These
instruments are designed to measure the
angles between adjacent crystal faces. They
were originally rather primitive and would
May, 1961
69
only permit the measurements to be per-
formed with an accuracy of 1 or % de-
gree. However, at the present time crystal
angles normally are measured with an ac-
curacy of 1 minute, and with the most
modern instruments an investigation of
even the most complicated crystals can be
completed in a rather short time.
Thus, crystallography from the very be-
ginning served to help mineralogy; when
a mineral’s crystal form once had been
measured and described accurately, the
limitation of the crystal faces could later
be used for the determination of this min-
eral species.
It would take us too far astray to dis-
cuss how crystallography has developed
into an independent science, and how it
very soon was no longer limited to the
study of the outer shape of crystals, but
also extended to the problem of the physi-
cal conditions that separate crystals from
non-crystalline substances.
However, there is one special branch of
crystal physics that we ought to stress.
This is crystal optics; i.e., the study of
the transmission of light through crystal-
line bodies. Crystal optics is a science
that already has obtained its most impor-
tant results, and for the most important
minerals the optical constants are now
known with great accuracy.
Optical investigations are of special im-
portance to mineralogy because the optical
constants serve as an excellent tool for
mineral identification. As soon as we have
determined the measurable optical prop-
erties quantitatively, such as refractive in-
dices, axial orientations, etc., it is easy
to identify minerals from the existing op-
tical determinative tables.
Optical methods of mineral identifica-
tion have one great advantage over all
other methods because they can be applied
even when the mineral occurs as micro-
scopic grains.
As an aid to mineralogy and petrog-
raphy, a special branch of applied crystal
optics has been developed. This is the
determination of optical constants by means
of the polarizing microscope. Based upon
the new exact methods, which mostly have
been developed by Frederich Becke in
Vienna, we can now determine the most
important optical constants on mineral
grains which are no bigger than 0.01 mm.
In addition to the optical methods there
are also a whole series of other physical j
methods that are used for mineral diag-
nosis, such as density determination, and
many others. It would take us too far from
our subject to mention all these methods
here. I shall mention in passing only one
method that has proven valuable for the
determination of numerous Norwegian
minerals, and that is the method by which
the radioactivity of minerals is quantita-
tively measured.
Through crystallography and crystal
physics, mineralogy is closely bound to the
physical sciences, and it is often difficult
to decide whether a specific investigation
should be considered of a physical or min-
eralogical nature.
In the meantime, the duties of descriptive
mineralogy as a natural science are cer-
tainly not completed by the determination
of the various physical properties of the
minerals. Another area of greatest impor-
tance in the field of mineralogy is that
concerning the chemical composition of
minerals.
During the latter half of the 18th and the
beginning of the 19th century, one of the
most important tasks for chemists was to
analyze minerals, to determine the elements
in minerals, and the ratios between the
amounts of these elements. In the field
of mineral analysis the Swedish scientists
have been the foremost leaders, and more
than anyone else, Berzelius, who at the j]
beginning of the last century developed
analytical methods which in the main still
form the basis for the present procedures.
Mineral-chemical studies have also been
of great importance to the progress of
chemistry. The investigation of the min-
eral argyrodite is a good example of this.
In 1885, a new silver-containing mineral
named argyrodite was found in one of the
70
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Freiberg silver mines in Saxony . The well-
known chemist Clemens Winkler undertook
its analysis and found silver and sulfur
to be the main constituents; however, the
sum of these elements never totaled more
than 93 or 94 percent of the weight of the
starting material even after repeated analy-
ses. In this way one was made aware
of a new and unknown element, given the
name germanium, that amounted to about
6 percent of the new mineral. Many ele-
ments were discovered by means of spec-
troanalytical investigations of minerals; I
need only mention indium and gallium.
The accuracy required for mineral anal-
yses is steadily increasing. First, improve-
ments are often made in the analytical
methods, mostly because constituents that
are subordinate in amount and earlier
were often overlooked, are now determined
in the analysis. One of the consequences
of this is that numerous elements that
were previously considered to be very rare,
such as vanadium, scandium, zirconium,
and others, have proven to be outstand-
ingly common as mineral constituents,
even though in rather small amounts. An-
other point of importance is that the purity
of minerals submitted for analysis must
be assured. Earlier it was considered suf-
ficient to pick the material by help of the
naked eye to obtain a product pure enough
for chemical analysis; today automatic
methods are used to separate the mineral
desired for chemical analysis from all ad-
mixed impurities. Among the modern
methods devised to obtain pure material
for analysis, the method of separation by
differences in specific gravities, accom-
plished through suspension in heavy liq-
uids, should be noted.
The importance of knowing the chemical
composition of the individual minerals is
apparent from the observation that the
entire mineralogical system is based on
the chemical composition of the minerals.
Thus the two most important areas within
the field of descriptive mineralogy are the
crystallographic investigations and the de-
termination of the chemical composition
of minerals.
If the results of both kinds of investiga-
tions are compared, it will be noted that
important relations exist between the
chemical compositions and the crystal-
lographic forms of the minerals.
As early as 1819 Eilhard Mitscherlich
found that substances possessing analogous
chemical composition may be similar also
in crystal form, a phenomenon which he
called isomorphism. As examples of such
minerals, we may mention the close crys-
tallographic relations among the minerals
barite, celestite, and anglesite, which are
sulfuric salts of barium, strontium, and
lead. All three crystallize in the ortho-
rhombic crystal system and have nearly
the same angular relations.
Such groups of crystallographically iso-
morphic and chemically analogous sub-
stances are very common among the min-
erals.
If a larger difference in chemistry exists
between two crystalline substances, then
the differences in crystal forms usually will
increase. In some but not all cases, one
may directly observe the changes in crystal
forms that are caused by definite chemical
substitutions. The peculiar group of hu-
mite minerals presents one of the most
interesting examples of such a situation.
On this occasion I should like to remind
you that it was a Norwegian scientist, Th.
Hiortdahl, who in 1862 first discovered
the laws governing these relations in this
field which ties together chemistry and
crystallography.
It is the responsibility of descriptive
mineralogy to investigate and describe all
the minerals that occur in nature. This
task can in a general way be said to have
been brought to a conclusion. Here and
there further special investigations are, of
course, required — little-known miner-
als have to be studied in further detail
and old, out-dated investigations must be
repeated using new and improved methods;
but the study that is still to be accom-
plished is insignificantly small in compar-
May, 1961
71
ison with the work that has already been
done.
The number of known mineral species
at the present time is estimated at 1,000;
a number which is not final, however, be-
cause new minerals are still to be dis-
covered. In recent years, from six to ten
valid mineral species have been discovered
each year. Usually they do not yield in-
formation of special interest beyond that
already learned from numerous older
species. One of the few exceptions is the
Norwegian mineral, thortveitite, which J.
Schetelig described three years ago and
which proved to be the first mineral to
contain significant amounts of the inter-
esting element scandium.
All in all, the contribution by Scandina-
vian scientists to the field of descriptive
mineralogy must be evaluated very highly.
I have tried to express this contribution
by compiling statistically the discoveries
of new mineral species. It appears that
among the 1,000 known mineral species,
Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, and Finnish
mineralogists discovered more than 150;
in other words, more than 15 percent of
the total number. At least a score of these
were described by Professor Brogger.
The responsibility of mineralogy, how-
ever, is not limited to investigations and
descriptions of individual minerals. If the
entire task amounted only to routine inves-
tigation of individual minerals, the job
might as well be performed by chemists
and physicists.
The distinction of minerals from other
inorganic bodies is that minerals originate
as products of nature, and for this reason
the science dealing with the occurrence of
minerals in nature forms a very essential
part of the field of mineralogy.
If one wants to study a mineral, then it
is not sufficient to investigate a number
of museum specimens by means of chem-
ical and physical methods; one must also
study the mineral where it occurs in na-
ture, study how it occurs, and observe the
geological conditions under which it was
formed.
Field observations show the existence
of a multitude of different types of min-
eral occurrences. Some minerals occur
only as primary components of igneous
rocks; in other words, they must have been
formed by solidification of glowing melts.
Others are formed by sublimation that
accompanies volcanic eruptions; and still
others are deposited from thermal waters
which have filled fissures in the crust of
the earth. Some are formed by evapora-
tion of concentrated salt solutions, others
by chemical reactions between older min-
erals.
If we compiled the observations that
exist on the occurrences of minerals in
nature and listed them according to geo-
logical conditions, we would conclude that
minerals can be grouped into a number of
associations which embrace the minerals
that commonly occur together under cer-
tain geological conditions. This concept
of mineral association corresponds to the
concept of fauna in zoology. Thus, a min-
eral association is composed of all the
minerals which coexist under given physi-
cal conditions. I shall mention only a few
examples of such mineral associations.
The examples that we here are most apt
to cite are the minerals which from the
beginning of the last century have made
southern Norway a famous locality among
mineralogists. I refer to the minerals from
the Langesund region not only because it
is conveniently nearby, but also because
its mineral association is the first which
has been exhaustively investigated by
modern methods. In a paper of 1890.
Brogger gave a prototype for all future
investigations of this kind.
Minerals of the Langesund region occur
in coarsely grained dikes, so-called peg-
matites consisting of nepheline syenite.
These pegmatites that accompany larger
eruptive masses of nepheline syenite have
been found to be especially rich in ele-
ments otherwise rare, such as zirconium,
thorium, and the rare earths yttrium and
cerium, etc. The pegmatites are also rich
in gases which were dissolved in the melt.
72
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
among which water vapor and combina-
tions of fluorine and boron must have
played an important role. As a conse-
quence of the peculiar chemical composi-
tion of these pegmatites, a rich multitude
of rare minerals have formed. A consid-
erable number have never been found pre-
viously in other localities. Some of the
Langesund minerals were separately in-
vestigated earlier by the methods of de-
scriptive mineralogy; however, Brogger
was the first investigator to perceive the
importance of treating all the minerals as
a group, in which the occurrence of each
mineral must be considered in connection
with the others.
Closely related mineral occurrences are
also found in other localities, especially in
Greenland, where nepheline syenites occur
with pegmatites.
Another type of mineral occurrence that
excels because of its special association
is the so-called Alpine mineral fissures
that were first studied in the Swiss Alps.
These minerals were deposited from aque-
ous solutions in rock fissures that were
formed during the mountain-folding pe-
riod. These occurrences are characterized
by beautifully developed quartz crystals,
titanium oxide minerals, alkali feldspars,
chlorite, and phosphates. These minerals
also are the product of defined geological
conditions and occur in all localities where
the appropriate geological conditions pre-
vailed. They are characteristic of the Nor-
wegian mountain areas.
Another mineral association that might
be mentioned is that found in contact
metamorphosed limestones, and we need
not go farther than to the area around
IGrefsen to study these minerals, which
occur in all localities where limestones are
in contact with younger igneous rocks.
Knowledge of the occurrence of min-
erals in nature contains a chapter of ut-
most practical importance: the investiga-
tion of the economically valuable minerals
and their occurrence; the study of ore
deposits. In reality, mining of all types is
nothing but applied mineralogy.
May, 1961
The two important branches of miner-
alogy outlined in this paper have provided
a vast empirical knowledge; i.e., the study
of the occurrence and properties of min-
erals. However, from a scientific point of
view it is not sufficient to possess only a
large amount of observational informa-
tion; it is embodied in the very spirit of
science to demand a logical connection be-
tween the individual observations, a tie-in
of the various facts by means of estab-
lished causality laws.
Thermodynamics, the basis for all exact
thinking within the field of natural sciences,
alone can provide mineralogy with the
desired causality laws. It is that branch
of science which shows us how the equi-
librium relations found in nature are con-
ditioned by the three main theses expressed
in the theory of heat. When we apply ther-
modynamics to mineralogical problems,
we must consider mineral formation as a
chemical process, the final product of which
is represented by the minerals. All chem-
ical reactions lead to a final equilibrium
situation according to the law of mass
action expressed by Guldberg and Waage.
Thermodynamic considerations have
been applied to various mineral-forming
processes. The first pioneering work in
this field was performed by the Dutchman,
Van’t Hoff, the famous physical chemist
who solved the problem of mineral forma-
tions in salt deposits.
In central Germany, especially near the
city of Stassfurt, there are enormous de-
posits of rock salts and of potassium salts
which were formed in ancient geological
times by evaporation of extensive seas. In
these massive deposits all kinds of miner-
als abound, especially chlorides and sul-
fates of sodium, potassium, calcium, and
magnesium; partly as single salts, partly
as complex compounds, partly anhydrous,
and partly as hydrates. All these salt min-
erals occur in many different combina-
tions.
Van’t Hoff considered from the thermo-
dynamic point of view the question of the
equilibrium conditions which will occur
73
when a large volume of sea water is ex-
posed to evaporation, and which salts will
crystallize and in what order. The result of
this investigation shows an excellent agree-
ment between thermodynamic theory and
mineralogical experience.1 * * * The minerals
which occur in the central German salt
deposits, as well as their mode of occur-
rence, are in complete agreement with the-
ory. Consequently, we have here an exam-
ple of a mineral-rich association that has
been formed under conditions which we
have clarified by means of the laws of
thermodynamics.
We have in these deposits an example
of minerals being formed by evaporation
of the liquid in which they were dissolved,
namely water. Another very simple process
which leads to mineral formation is solid-
ification of a melt by cooling. This mode
of mineral formation is especially common
in nature. The process is exemplified in
any lava flow which erupts as a melt and
later solidifies by cooling. Crystallization
of this kind of melt is governed by very
simple thermodynamic laws that were ap-
plied many years ago to the studies of the
formation of alloys. Johann H. L. Vogt
applied the laws governing the crystalliza-
tion of melts to mineral formation during
solidification of eruptive rocks. Also in
this case, excellent agreement exists be-
tween the minerals that should form ac-
cording to theory and those which were
found to form in reality.
These two cases are easy to treat the-
oretically because we can continuously fol-
low the change in the equilibrium rela-
tions during the entire period of time from
the beginning of mineral formation until
it is completed, both during crystalliza-
tion of salt solutions and during solidifica-
tion of melts. However, in most cases we
1Certain salt compounds which cannot form
directly by the natural evaporation of sea water,
but which in spite of this sometimes occur in
these salt deposits, were formed secondarily by
reactions between the primary salt minerals. Also
these processes of secondary mineral formation
in salt deposits are in complete agreement with
the laws of thermodynamics.
only know the system in its last stage rep-
resented by the observed minerals, and we
do not know the earlier stages of the re-
action.
Thermodynamics may be applied to i
these problems with very advantageous re-
sults because, as I have shown, each min-
eral occurrence in itself possesses the cri-
teria which permit a decision whether we ;
are faced with an equilibrium condition f
or not. A relationship exists between the
number of coexisting minerals and the
number of their chemical components, a i
relation to which I have given the name ;
“the mineralogical phase rule.” Provided
equilibrium existed during mineral forma-
tions, this numerical relation must be ful- |l
filled quite independently of the processes
of mineral formation.
Some years ago I had the opportunity
to test the validity of this law on the min-
erals which are associated with contact •
metamorphism. It can also explain many
regularities in the occurrence of ore min- :
erals, which I have shown by the example
of silver-antimonisulfides, and the number
of examples demonstrating the conformity *
to this law could be extended without dif-
ficulty. Thus, when we know the mineral
paragenesis, and which minerals coexist, ij
and what their compositions are, we can
immediately decide whether equilibrium
conditions were obtained.
What are the conditions for thermody- r
namic equilibrium, and why is it that we •
find some minerals in one occurrence and
not in another? The answer is that equi-
librium conditions depend upon three in- i
dependently variable factors. The first of
these is represented by the bulk chemical
composition of the existing minerals; it
tells us which starting material the min- 1
eral-forming processes had to work with.
The two other factors are the temperature
and the pressure under which crystalliza- r<
tion took place. These factors depend upon
the geological conditions of the mineral VJ
occurrence. From one given starting ma- H
terial different minerals may form, de- J
pending on the temperature and pressure, j
74
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences I
In some cases we may from purely thermo-
dynamic reasoning predict the temperature
and pressure which must exist in order
for certain mineral associations to be
formed. One example of this, to which 1
once called attention, is the formation of
calcium-rich silicates at the expense of
calcium carbonate. This process can only
take place within a certain pressure and
temperature range. Thus, we have a meth-
od to determine the physical conditions,
temperature and pressure, which have ex-
isted in the crust of the earth during min-
eral formation.
It is of course of great interest to be
able to determine the physical conditions
under which an individual mineral has
been formed. It is of much greater im-
portance not to limit such investigations
to one single occurrence, but to study
thoroughly a sizeable area in order to in-
vestigate the temperature-pressure distri-
bution during a certain geological era.
Such an investigation, no doubt the first
of its kind, is being performed by myself
in the Norwegian mountain areas, from
Ryfylke to Trondhjemsfjorden, in order
to determine the temperature and pressure
conditions in this part of the earth’s crust
during the formation of the Norwegian
Caledonides at the beginning of the De-
vonian. The procedure of such a systematic
investigation is as follows: rock specimens
| are collected a few kilometers apart and
! each specimen is studied by optical meth-
ods to recognize certain signs indicating
the temperature and pressure which ex-
isted in the locality in question during the
formation of the rock. The sum of all ob-
servations gives us a picture of the temper-
ature-pressure distribution during the for-
l mation of a mountain chain.
After having investigated several thou-
sand thin sections, I expect to finish these
studies in the foreseeable future. Our
knowledge of the conditions of mineral
formation is partly based upon purely
I thermodynamic considerations. However,
there is also another method which pro-
vides us with information concerning the
conditions existing during deposition of
minerals; this is experimentation.
In the first half of the 19th century,
attempts were made by laboratory experi-
mentation to produce synthetic minerals
identical to those which had been observed
in nature. The experimentation was car-
ried out in such a manner as to simulate
the conditions which were assumed to
have existed during the formation of the
minerals in nature. The best-known result
of mineral synthesis during this era is that
of the French mineralogist Daubree, who
synthesized the mineral cassiterite, Sn02.
Cassiterite occurs in deposits which are
assumed to have formed by volcanic gas
exhalations of which particularly halogen
species, fluorine- and chlorine-rich gases,
are assumed to have played a significant
role. Daubree synthesized cassiterite crys-
tals by letting tin chloride vapor and water
vapor react at high temperature, and simi-
lar procedures served well for the synthesis
of a great number of other minerals com-
monly associated with cassiterite.
A considerable number of the minerals
which occurred in nature were gradually
synthesized in the laboratory by many
different methods, corresponding approxi-
mately to the many possibilities of min-
eral formation by natural processes. Some
minerals were synthesized practically by
coincidence, inasmuch as technical proc-
esses yielded as byproducts, minerals
which earlier were known from nature; I
only need to remind you of the minerals
in metallurgical slags (particularly well
known from the investigations by Profes-
sor Vogt), which so frequently are iden-
tical to those occurring in natural silicate
rocks.
Mineral syntheses were sometimes of
economic importance as well. I may men-
tion here the synthesis of the two gem
stones, ruby and sapphire, which are pres-
ently produced synthetically in such
amounts that the natural minerals have
practically lost their great value.
Scientific investigations in the field of
mineral synthesis were previously satisfied
May, 1961
75
with growing the mineral in question and
only recording the conditions of its forma-
tion in an approximate way. As the prin-
ciples of thermodynamics began to be ap-
plied in the science of mineralogy, more
was expected of the results of mineral syn-
thesis. It was not sufficient any longer only
to synthesize a mineral; it was also re-
quired to have the most detailed knowl-
edge of the temperature-pressure condi-
tions of the synthesis, as well as of the
necessary chemical conditions. In other
words, mineral syntheses had to be per-
formed as quantitative precision investiga-
tions. Large difficulties blocked the prog-
ress of such projects. Precision studies had
never been attempted before at such high
temperatures, 1000° to 2000° C, where
even the temperature scale was suffering
from regrettable uncertainties. One specific
institution must be given the credit for
not only having made such investigations
possible, but also for having completed
numerous investigations of this kind; this
is the Geophysical Labortory of the Car-
negie Institution of Washington. The pub-
lications of this Laboratory bring us every
year descriptions of numerous important
mineral syntheses performed by the most
exact methods. The accompanying num-
erous scientific observational data give us
the basic background for thermodynamic
studies of natural minerals.
Mineral syntheses are likewise of great
importance for purely descriptive mineral-
ogy because the pure artificial minerals
make it possible for us to determine the
physical constants with greater accuracy
than is possible with the corresponding
natural material. Only one disadvantage is
connected with the modern mineral syn-
thesis— it requires exceedingly expensive
experimental equipment. For this reason
it is not possible at the present time to
perform such investigations at the Uni-
versity of Oslo. However, we have in this
country abundant material for investiga-
tions of all the interesting Norwegian min-
eral occurrences. Studies of this material
will prove very fruitful and will especially
augment our understanding of the thermo-
dynamic laws governing mineral forma-
tion.
As we have seen, mineralogy differs
from most or all other natural sciences
because its sphere of interest extends into
so many different areas. Crystallography,
experimental physics, analytical and syn-
thetic chemistry, thermodynamics, and
geology must be counted as the absolutely
necessary background for mineralogical
investigations. However, all these associ-
ated sciences have richly reaped the fruits
of their cooperation with mineralogy.
Crystal physics has, through mineral in-
vestigations, almost reached its goal — ex-
ploration of the constitution of the solid
state. I shall mention in passing in this
connection only the work by Laue and
Bragg dealing with the application of X-
rays in the field of crystallography.
Chemistry owes its thanks to the analysis
of minerals and mineral products for the
discovery of most elements. Geology is
indebted to mineralogy now that it is be-
coming an exact natural science: it is the
thermodynamic mineralogy which gives us
numerical data concerning the tempera-
ture-pressure conditions prevailing in the
earth’s crust during geological processes,
and these numbers will surely in the future
form the basis for the exact mathematical
treatment of the mechanics of geology.
After having attempted to survey the
problems of mineralogy, the methods
which are employed, and the results that
so far have been obtained, one realizes
involuntarily the great debt of gratitude
he owes the generations of scientists who
laid the foundation for our present studies,
not least to the scientists here in Scan-
dinavia who furnished an essential part of
our mineralogical knowledge. I must be
permitted to give special thanks to one
particular man who has done such an im-
portant part of this work and who is also
the educator of all the mineralogists of
our time in the Scandinavian countries,
the man to whom I myself owe so much
for my scientific development — Professor
Brogger.
76
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
The Amateur and the Academy *
Frank L. Campbell
Mr. President and fellow members of the
Academy :
I hope this evening to convince you that
we are all amateurs with respect to the
Washington Academy of Sciences, that the
Academy should be proud of its amateur
status, and that membership in the Acad-
emy should be thrown open to many more
amateurs without limit.
Of course, I must define the word that
is so important to my thesis. It is derived
from the verb that every Latin student of
my generation knew best: amare, to love.
An amateur is a lover of some kind of
human activity that some people are paid
to pursue, but which he loves so much
that he engages in it without pay. The
amateur is always compared with the pro-
fessional, and because the latter may be
just as enthusiastic about his subject as
the amateur and may have much more
time to spend on it, the professional is
likely to be more skillful or more produc-
tive than the amateur. Thus the word
“amateur” has become slightly tainted in
the sense of the adjective “amateurish.”
But I choose to use “amateur” only in the
sports sense: the professional is paid, the
amateur is not; their relative proficiency
is irrelevant.
Obviously a person can be a profession-
al in one subject and an amateur in others.
Most of the members of the Academy were
elected because they were successful pro-
fessionals; thereafter they became ama-
teurs with respect to the activities of the
Academy, serving as officers or members
of committees, attending meetings, helping
*From the address of the retiring president,
February 18, 1960. It consisted of the argumen-
tation here printed, followed by information and
commentary on pictures of tree flowers and in-
sect eggs taken by amateurs Walter O’Kane and
Alvah Peterson, respectively. — Ed.
young people in various ways, serving on
the staff of the fournal , etc. Their special-
ized knowledge and ideas are of little use
in the Academy, because they can be fully
understood, appreciated, and criticized
only by other specialists. There is no pro-
vision in the Academy for meetings of
specialists for critical discussion of work
in progress. Such opportunities should be
provided by the more specialized affiliated
societies. The Academy, covering all
branches of natural science, must of ne-
cessity appeal to amateurs, because only
amateurs can take an interest in all scien-
tific subjects, from atoms to anthropology,
and from agriculture to aeronautics.
After all, what is the principal purpose
of the Academy? To advance the frontiers
of science? No; that is the function of
scientific societies where specialists meet
to stimulate one another. Is not the prin-
cipal purpose of the Academy an educa-
tional one? To point out to all amateurs
that there are frontiers of science to be
explored, and to give them some idea of
the joys of exploration and of what has
been found and may lie ahead? Certainly
the Academy is now acting as if mutual
education of adults and encouragement of
science talent among students were its
chief functions. If this is true, all adults
who want to participate ought to be mem-
bers of the Academy. We should have in
the Academy not only older scientists
whose work has been “recognized,” but
younger men and women on their way to
recognition, science teachers of all ages,
and intelligent people who recognize the
importance of science in modern civiliza-
tion and want to know more about it and
its practitioners — people who want to keep
up with their children or who have or
want a hobby in science.
Is there anything wrong with broaden-
May, 1961
77
ing the base of the Academy? It might
be feared that an undiscriminating acad-
emy would no longer attract mature pro-
fessionals who are willing to pay for the
satisfaction of belonging to a somewhat
exclusive organization. Some organiza-
tions maintain class and mass by setting
up two categories of membership. Thus
the present selected members of the Acad-
emy might become Fellows, and anyone
upon application might become an ordi-
nary member, subject to advancement to
Fellow when qualified. I am not convinced
that this system would be better for the
Academy than a single category of mem-
bership open to all upon application and
payment of dues. One can be sure that no
selection committee can be completely om-
niscient and unbiased. My inclination,
therefore, is simply to open the doors of
the Academy to all who will pay dues, and
let recognition come naturally to those
who have earned it through their work,
both as professionals or amateurs outside
the Academy and as amateurs inside.
In one way or another the Academy
should greatly increase its membership,
not only to bring its income up to its ex-
penses, but to carry out more effectively
its major purpose in the community. Other
state and municipal academies do not re-
strict their membership; but on the other
hand few, if any, have numerous affiliated
societies like those connected with the
Washington Academy, it may be argued
that the Washington Academy would be
competing with its affiliated societies if it
were to solicit members in the Washington
area. I think it very unlikely that a person
eligible for both would choose the Academy
instead of an affiliated society nearest to
his interests. However, there should be
many not interested in any affiliated society
who might be attracted to the Academy;
e.g., secondary school science teachers, un-
specialized professionals concerned with
science, and pure amateurs.
1 have no idea how many adult ama-
teurs might be at large and susceptible to
attraction into the Academy. We know,
of course, that there are many nature lov-
ers who go out with field glasses and cam-
eras to sharpen their knowledge and ap-
preciation of birds, trees, flowers, etc. This
observational fact finding is the beginning
of science. An estimate of the numbers of
local amateur naturalists could probably
be obtained from the chief naturalist of
the National Capital Parks, whose organi-
zation exists to help them. At present the
Academy has little to offer them, but it
could build up services for senior ama-
teurs as effective as those it has already
devised for junior amateurs. The way has
been pointed out by the Maryland Acad-
emy of Sciences, which has set up three
affiliated societies for amateurs: (1) ar-
cheology, (2) astronomy, and (3) min-
eralogy. At the meetings of these societies,
amateurs can report their observations
and show their specimens or equipment,
and they can learn from professionals who
work with them. The local societies affili-
ated with the Academy that I happen to
know tend to be social organizations of
professionals; they do not cater to ama-
teurs.
I was once a professional entomologist,
but since World War II l have become an
amateur in entomology and a professional
servant of biological scientists. As an
amateur in entomology, I should like to
be a member of a society named, let us
say, the L. 0. Howard Society, an offshoot
of the Academy or of the Entomological
Society of Washington, composed of ama-
teur observers, collectors, and photogra-
phers of insects. As retiring president of
the Entomological Society of Washington.
I suggested the encouragement of amateurs
by that society, but I now think that the
effort had better be made by the Academy
as a part of a general program for the
encouragement of senior amateurs.
A great proponent of amateur entomol-
ogy is my first instructor in entomology
at Rutgers University, Alvah Peterson. He
became professor of entomology at the
Ohio State University in 1928, with spe-
cial responsibility for courses on the bi-
78
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
ological control of insects. Because he was
there, I was happy to join the faculty of
his department in 1936, and I was with
him until World War II brought me back
to Washington. He was a professional on
biological control and a devoted amateur
on the identification of immature insects,
principally the larvae of insects. As his
retirement approached in 1958, he began
to study insect eggs, hoping that he could
devote full time to them after age 70. The
support he applied for was not immediate-
ly forthcoming, but he found a temporary
job in entomology in Florida and became
an amateur on insect eggs. He has also
taken every opportunity to promote ama-
teur entomology. Why, he wonders, are
birds so much more popular than insects
as objects of amateur study in the United
States? Is it because all insects are re-
garded as pests, fit only to be killed? That
is not true, of course. Relatively few spe-
cies do any serious damage to man or his
possessions, and relatively little is known
about the species that are beneficial or of
small economic importance. Whereas an
amateur has little chance of contributing
anything new to our knowledge of birds,
I except through banding, he might well add
something to our knowledge of insects
merely by taking pains to observe closely
and frequently populations of any species
that he may encounter. The late Austin H.
Clark, whom some of you knew, was cur-
ator of echinoderms in the Smithsonian
Institution. But he was also an enthusiastic
Academy Receives
The National Science Foundation will
grant $26,775 to the Washington Academy
of Sciences during fiscal year 1962, for the
continuance of the Academy’s program on
science education. Approval of the grant
was announced on April 7 by Harry C.
Kelly, associate director of NSF.
The program supported by the grant will
have a four-fold objective:
amateur entomologist and became an au-
thority on the butterflies of Virginia. He
was president of the Washington Academy
of Sciences in 1941, a great scientist and
ideal amateur whose knowledge and en-
thusiasm were infectious. What Mr. Clark
accomplished, many others can also to a
lesser degree.
Dr. Peterson has pointed out that al-
though adult amateur entomology does not
thrive in the United States, it does in
Japan, where at least one amateur insect
society exists in every city. Looking ahead,
he wrote, “We might dream of a national
amateur insect group comparable to the
National Audubon Society .... Before
this can take place, active, local, adult
groups must be established in our cities
. . . . Professional entomologists are in a
position to help local groups ...” I hope
that Washington will be the first to estab-
lish a local, adult, amateur entomological
society under the wing of our Academy.
The Washington Junior Academy of Sci-
ences also might establish a working group
in entomology, or in any other subject of
sufficient interest to enlist the attention of
a number of students. I use entomology
only by way of illustration.
This is the end of my serious message
to the Academy. To summarize, I recom-
mend opening membership in the Academy
to all adults who are interested in its pur-
poses, and I urge the establishment in the
Academy of senior amateur study groups
in various branches of natural science.
NSF Grant
To maintain a roster of scientists and
engineers willing to assist with educational
activities;
To conduct a series of conferences on
problems concerned with science teaching
at the local level;
To sponsor and participate in the de-
velopment of experimental educational
courses in science;
May, 1961
79
To provide for a program of inter-
academy contacts to improve science edu-
cational communications.
As has been the case for previous grants
from the Foundation, the program will be
administered by the Joint Board on Sci-
ence Education. John K. Taylor is the
Board’s director of science projects, while
G. Gravatt Coleman is its executive secre-
tary. John W. Carroll operates the project
office in the Academy’s headquarters at
1530 P St., N.W.
The new program, which will get under
way July 1, following termination of the
present grant, will continue many of the
present activities. The Visiting Scientist
Program, which has been so successful
this year, will be strengthened. The science
teaching conferences will be extended to
include discussions of science teaching at
the elementary school level. The grant also
makes it possible to continue the sponsor-
ship of the experimental courses designed
to correlate science and mathematics teach-
ing.
A new feature will provide for an inter-
academy conference to be held in the late
fall. Representatives from neighboring
academies will be invited to discuss their
respective programs in science education
with the aim of coordinating their activ-
ities, especially in areas where their boun-
daries meet or overlap.
In preparation for the continuing pro-
gram, the Joint Board is revising its roster
of scientists and engineers willing to assist
in educational activities. The present list
includes more than 200 persons who have
prepared illustrated and demonstration
lectures for presentation to school classes,
science clubs, and related groups. Most of
them have been called upon at least once,
and many have lectured several times dur-
ing the past year. The list needs to be
expanded — new subjects are needed to ex-
pand the scope of the list, and additional
speakers for subjects already listed are
needed to provide services on a wider
basis.
Interested persons may phone the office
of the Joint Board ( NO 7-3661) to obtain
the brochure, “Visiting Scientists,” which
describes the program more fully.
Special WAS Meeting Draws Crowd
Over 400 people attended a special Acad-
emy meeting on April 6, at the Carnegie
Institution, to hear a discussion on living
with a thermonuclear threat.
The speaker was Herman Kahn of the
Rand Corporation, whose topic was,
“Thinking about the Unthinkable.”
Kahn, with a background of training in
physics and applied mathematics, has been
a Rand staff member since 1948, devoting
his attention to problems of military plan-
ning and strategy. He is the author of the
controversial book, “On Thermonuclear
War.”
The implications of thermonuclear war-
fare are decidedly unpleasant to consider,
Kahn admits. But he takes the viewpoint
that consideration of these implications and
their consequences is highly important in
order to avoid such warfare or to survive
it, if it does occur. He considers various
“alternative national postures” and dis-
cusses “tragic but distinguishable post-war
states” with the number of our dead rang-
ing by steps from 2 million to 160 million
and the time for economic recuperation
ranging from 1 year to 100 years. He won-
ders at which of these states the survivors
would envy the dead. He considers the
elimination of the “unnecessary dead” as
something “vastly worth doing.” He dif-
ferentiates between capacity for a limited
war (lasting one day) or for a long war
(lasting 2 to 30 days). “While thermonu-
clear war would probably be an unprece-
dented catastrophe for the defender, this is
a far cry from an unlimited catastrophe.
The limits of the catastrophe depend on the
80
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
kinds of preparations and on how the war
is started and fought.”
From informal polls of the lay public,
the lecturer concludes that the average
American might be willing to see this coun-
try suffer from 10 to 60 million deaths if
necessary in order to maintain our present
way of life.
The discussion did not lead to any spe-
cific outline for action on either a national
or an individual scale. It implied that radi-
ation meters should he made available to
every individual.
The lecturer took spirited issue with crit-
ics of his book, who feel that considerations
of this sort are too horrible to contemplate.
In the present state of the world, he insists
they are absolutely necessary for survival.
In the longer run, if we do survive, he feels
that disarmament and world government
are the only real solutions to the problem.
MAY MEETING
(458th Regular Meeting of the Washington Academy of Sciences)
SUBJECT
Four -member Panel Discussion:
“ Are Science Fairs Hindering Science Education ?”
PANELISTS
Keith C. Johnson , D.C. Public Schools
Doris E. Hadary, Bethesda-Chevy Chase High School
Leo Schubert , American University
Burrell Wood , Science Service
MODERATOR
Philip H. Abelson , Geophysical Laboratory
DATE
Thursday, May 18, 1961, 8:15 p.m.
PLACE
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, Cosmos Club, 2170 Florida Ave., l\.W.
May, 1961
81
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical
committees, civic activities, and marriages, births,
and other family news. Formal contributors have
been assigned for the systematic collection of
news at institutions employing considerable num-
bers of Academy members (see list on mast-
head). However, for the bulk of the membership,
we must rely on individuals to send us news
concerning themselves and their friends. Con-
tributions may be addressed to Harold T. Cook,
Associate Editor, care of Agricultural Marketing
Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Rm.
3917 South Bldg., Washington 25, D. C.
CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF
WASHINGTON
Merle A. Tuve, director, Department of Ter-
restrial Magnetism, is chairman of the new Geo-
physics Research Board, National Academy of
Sciences.
Hatten S. Yoder, Jr., of the Geophysical Lab-
oratory is head of an American panel organized
under the Geophysics Research Board to con-
sider studies on earth’s mantle.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
The Board of Geographic Names has approved
the name of Roberts Inlet for an inlet in Berkner
Island, Weddell Sea, Antarctica, in honor of
Capt. E. B. Roberts (retired).
D. S. Carder, member of the Board of Direc-
tors, Seismological S’ociety of America, presented
a paper, co-authored with W. V. Mickey, on
“Ground Effects from Underground Explosions”
at the annual meeting of the Society in San
Diego, Calif.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
George W. Morey visited the Lawrence Radi-
ation Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., and the
laboratories of the U. S. Geological Survey in
Menlo Park, Calif., March 6-9.
Edwin W. Roedder gave a paper before the
Geological Society of Washington, March 22, on
“Depression of the freezing point in fluid in-
clusions.”
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
H. George Mandel, professor of pharmacol-
ogy, recently became secretary-elect of the Amer-
ican Society for Pharmacology and Experimental
Therapeutics.
Paul W. Bowman, professor of biology, will
be attending the meetings of the American Asso-
ciation for Cancer Research and of the Federa-
tion, in Atlantic City.
Mary L. Robbins, Department of Bacteriol-
ogy, spent a day recently at Far Rockaway High
School, New York, as a visiting biologist under
the auspices of AIBS’, speaking to four separate
classes on microbiology, medical science, and
career problems and opportunities. In the evening
she lectured on “The Biology of Viruses” to
students and teachers and to the Rockaway
Academy of Science.
HARRIS RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Alfred E. Brown, former vice president, has
been elected president of HRL. Dr. Brown re-
mains director of research of the company, which
he joined in 1945.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
The following talks have been given by mem-
bers of the staff: F. L. Alt: “Recent Results in
Machine Translation” at Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, March 17; R. G. Bates: “Me-
dium Effects in Ethanol-Water Solvents” at a
Seminar on Special Topics in Physical Chem-
istry, Duke University, February 28; L. M.
Branscomb: “Spectra and Electron Affinities of
Gaseous Negative Ions” at Yale University,
March 2; H. P. Broida: “Trapped Radicals” —
Sigma Xi, McGill University, February 20, and
Physics-Chemistry Colloquium, University of
Western Ontario, February 21; V. R. Deitz:
“The Rate of Physical Absorption at Low Sur-
face Coverage” — American Chemical Society
Colloid Division Symposium at St. Louis, in
March; C. Eisenhart: “To Fit or Not to Fit:
That is the Question” at the Statistics Seminar.
Yale University, March 20. and Statistics Col-
loquium, Harvard University, March 22; H. P.
R. Frederikse: “Properties of Rutile (TiOiT ’
at the Department of Physics, Johns Hopkins
University, March 9; M. L. Greenough: “FOS-
DIC III, an Electr-Optical Scanner for Process-
ing the 1960 Census Data” at the IRE (Profes-
sional Group on Electronic Computers), Wash-
ington, on March 1; L. Marton: “Some Aspects
of Electron Physics” at the Department of Phys-
ics, New York University, March 14; C. M.
Herzfeld: “Nuclear Orientation” at the Physics
Department Colloquium, Duke University, March
8: G. C. Paffenbarger: “Dimensional Accuracy
of Dentures” at the Berks County Dental Society,
Reading, Pa., March 6; E. K. Plyler: “Vibra-
tion-Rotation Bands of N-O” at Florida State
University, March 14; L. Rhodes: “Machine
Translation” at the Rochester, N. Y., Optical
82
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Society of America meeting, March 21; L. S.
Taylor: “Radiation Hazards and Common
Sense” and “Opportunities for Scientific Work
with the U. S. Government” at Harvard Uni-
versity, March 14-15; C. E. Weir: “Progress in
High Pressure Research and Future Applica-
tions” at Annual Engineers, Scientists Day
(Sponsored by the D. C. Council of Engineering
and Architectural Societies and the Washington
Academy of Sciences), February 23; W. J. You
den: “Better Answers with Less Work” at the
Joint meeting of the Buffalo-Niagara Sections of
American Statistical Association and the Amer-
ican Society for Quality Control, Tonowanda,
N. Y., February 27 ; and “Applications of Sta-
tistics in Experiments at NBS” at the Johns
Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health,
March 10.
The following talks were presented before the
Dental Materials Group, International Associa-
tion for Dental Research, at Boston on March
23-26: G. M. Brauer: “Synthesis of 5-Methyl-
2-propoxybenzoic Acid and Its Reaction with
Zinc Oxide”; G. C. Pafifenbarger : “Siloco-
Phosphate as Cementing Media”; G. Dickson:
“Some Rheological Properties of Dental Amal-
gam.”
The following talks were presented before the
Fourth Symposium on Temperature, sponsored
by the American Institute of Physics, Instrument
Society of America, and the National Bureau of
Standards at Columbus, Ohio, March 27-30:
H. J. Kostkowski: “Some Equilibrium and
Non-Equilibrium Characteristics of a Helium
Plasma Arc” and “Theory and Methods of Op-
tical Pyrometry”; and A. G. McNish: “The Role
of Temperature in Our Measurement System.”
Ernest Ambler, Cryogenic Physics Section,
Heat Division, was one of the recipients of the
Arthur S. Flemming Award for outstanding men
in the Washington area. The award was pre-
sented by the Junior Chamber of Commerce of
Washington on February 16.
Charlotte M. Sitterly, Spectroscopy Section,
Atomic Physics Division, was one of the six re-
cipients of the Federal Woman’s Award for her
outstanding contributions to the Federal Govern-
ment in the field of astrophysics and spectro-
scopy. The award was presented to Dr. Sitterly
by the Civil Service Commission on February 24.
The award, the first of its kind, was established
exclusively to honor career women chosen from
the entire Federal Government.
The Exceptional S’ervice Gold Medal Award
has been given to Lewis Branscomb, chief of
the Atomic Physics Division, for his very effec-
tive leadership and outstanding scientific con-
tributions in the development of basic knowledge
of the atomic processes of stellar atmospheres,
the terrestrial ionosphere, and interplanetary
space; to Thomas Digges, chief of the Thermal
Metallurgy Section, Metallurgy Division, for ex-
ceptional contributions to the science of metal-
lurgy through his own research on a variety of
metallurgical phenomena and through the or-
ganization and leadership of highly significant
scientific programs at the managerial level; and
to Irl C. Schoonover, associate director of the
Bureau, for exceptional leadership of significance
to the Department and the Nation on materials
research, program and organization planning,
and development and utilization of scientists;
and for extraordinary versatility as a scientist-
executive.
The Meritorious Service Silver Medal has been
awarded to Martin Greenspan, physicist in the
Sound Section, Mechanics division, for the de-
velopment of an instrument which measures ac-
curately and rapidly the speed of sound in
natural waters, and which greatly facilitates re-
search into the physics of sound in the sea; and
to John Torgesen, physicist in the Pure Sub-
stances Section, Analytical and Inorganic Chem-
istry Division, for his studies of the growth of
single crystals and mechanisms of purification.
S. L. Madorsky of the Polymer Structure
Section, Organic and Fibrous Materials Division,
retired at the end of February. A tea in his
honor was held on February 28 in the Manse
Lecture Room.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
Herbert Friedmann, who was head curator
of zoology at the National Museum until his
retirement on March 15, became director of the
Los Angeles County Museum on April 1.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Hazel K. Stiebeling participated in meetings
of the Joint FAO/WHO Advisory Committee on
Nutrition, held in Geneva, Switzerland, April
18-25. She also will attend a meeting of the
joint FAO/WHO Committee on Calcium, to be
held in Rome, May 23-30.
Edward H. Graham, director of plant tech-
nology, S’oil Conservation Service, is president
of the International Commission on Ecology,
which will hold its Sixth Meeting at Zurich.
Switzerland, May 1-6. Two days will be devoted
to business matters, followed by a Symposium
on Coordination of Scientific Methods Used for
the Study of Ecology in Holarctic National
Parks. A field trip will conclude the sessions.
The Commission is an integral part of the In-
ternational Union for Conservation of Nature
and Natural Resources, and has served since its
origin in 1954 as the scientific advisory body
to the Union.
Kenneth W. Parker gave an illustrated talk
on “Grasslands in Spain and France,” at the
March 1 meeting of the National Capital Section,
May, 1961
83
American Society of Range Management, which
was held in the Department of Agriculture.
Kenneth A. Haines, Agricultural Research
Service, attended the Sixth Session of the Tech-
nical Advisory Council, Inter-American Institute
of Agricultural S'ciences, held at San Jose, Costa
Rica. March 6-10; he served as the United
States representative on the Council. The Insti-
tute is an arm of the Organization of American
States and has as its objectives graduate train-
ing and research in the field of agriculture.
USDA, BELTSVILLE
C. H. Hoffmann, Entomology Research Divi-
sion, ARS, presented a paper entitled “Benefits
and Limitations of Insecticides Used to Control
Insects of Importance to Agriculture and Public
Health” at the 7th Annual Conference of the
Illinois Mosquito Control Association, held at
Urbana, 111., March 10.
Erwin L. LeClerg presented a series of 10
lectures on experimental design and applied sta-
tistics to a group of 20 entomologists at Vin-
cennes, Ind., in early February, and to 25 research
scientists at Belle Glade, Fla., in March. Both
groups were employees of the Agricultural Re-
search Service.
At the awards dinner of the National Grain
Sorghum Research Committee at Amarillo, Tex.,
on March 7, the Grain Sorghum Producers As-
sociation presented John H. Martin with a
“Plaque and a Scroll” for distinguished service
to American agriculture in sorghum agronomy
and physiology.
S. L. Emsweller was awarded a Certificate of
Merit in February by the Michigan State Flor-
ists Association “in recognition and appreciation
of his unselfish labor and achievement for the
advancement of the floricultural industry.”
Myron S. Anderson attended a meeting of
the Iowa Academy of Science at Indianola, April
14-15, and spoke on the subject, “Soil Science
as a Cultural S’ubject.” While in Iowa, Dr. An-
derson expected to present a short course on
geology at William Penn College, Oskaloosa.
Aurel O. Foster has been appointed director
of the USDA Parasitological Research Labora-
tories at Beltsville. In his new position, Dr.
Foster will direct and coordinate USDA research
programs in animal parasitology.
Kermit W. Kreitlow, research pathologist in
the Crops Research Division, presented an invi-
tational paper, “Diseases of Range Forage Plants
and Their Effect on Range Management” at the
annual meeting of the American Society of Range
Management, held in Salt Lake City January 31 -
February 3.
W. B. Ennis, Jr., chief of the Crops Protec-
tion Research Branch, Crops Research Division,
ARS, presented an invitational paper entitled
“Progress and Potential in Weed Investigations”
at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Southern
Weed Conference, St. Petersburg, Fla., January
18-20.
UNCLASSIFIED
Irving A. Denison, a senior chemist on the
staff of the Army’s Diamond Ordnance Fuze Lab-
oratories, retired on March 17 after more than
40 years of Federal service. He received the A.B.
and M.S. degrees from the University of Illinois
in 1920 and 1921, and the Ph.D. degree from
George Washington University in 1929. He was
appointed as chemist in the Department of Agri-
culture in 1922, and transferred to the National
Bureau of Standards in 1929. In 1953, Dr. Deni-
son transferred to the Diamond Ordnance Fuze
Laboratories. He is well known for his research
on corrosion of metals, and on fuel cells and
other unique power supplies.
RETIREMENTS IN 1960
Harvey Chaplin, W. B. Emerson, John C. Lilly,
Marvin Marcus, and Benjamin Schwartz.
DEATHS
Walter E. Dove, who would have been 67
years old on April 14, died on March 22. Dr.
Dove was a native of Mississippi. He received
the B.S. degree from Mississippi Agricultural
and Mechanical College in 1913 and the Sc.D.
degree from Johns Hopkins University in 1929.
He was an entomologist in USDA’s Bureau of
Entomology from 1913 to 1945, except for about
two years when he was in military service during
World War I. He was research entomologist with
U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc., from 1945 to
1954 and entomologist and parasitologist with
Food Machinery and Chemicals Corporation from
1954 to 1959. Since 1959 he had been a con-
sultant on insecticides. Dr. Dove was awarded a
silver medal by the American Medical Associa-
tion and received a citation from the Navy De-
partment in recognition of his research on in-
sects affecting man and animals.
Russell S. McBride died on April 3; he was
73 years old. A native of Minnesota, Mr. Mc-
Bride received the B.S. degree from the Univer-
sity of Minnesota in 1908 and the M.S. degree
from the University of Wisconsin in 1909. After
working on the chemistry of fuels and gas at the ■
National Bureau of Standards for 10 years, he
became engineering representative for McGraw- '
Hill Publishing Company, and in 1921 became
a consulting engineer. He continued this work j
for 40 years, numbering among his clients the
Union Carbide Company, Olin Mathieson Chemi-
cal Corporation, the Coca Cola Company, and
the Texas Power and Light Company. He was
a former president of the Chemical Engineers
Club of Washington and the Chemical Society of I
Washington.
84
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
Where information as to the specific program
scheduled, for meetings of Affiliated Societies was
not available sufficiently in advance to have been
included in the Calendar of Events for the April
issue of the Journal, it is carried below as a news
item. Additional items considered of general
interest are noted at appropriate points.
Acoustical Society of America, Washington
Chapter
The final technical meeting of the year, April
17, featured a talk by Vincent Salmon of Stan-
ford Research Institute, on ‘'Factors Affecting
the Reproduction of Sound.” This gathering was
held in the exhibit room of the Industrial Build-
ing, NBS, following an informal dinner at the
Cafe Burgundy.
The May meeting will be a social gathering.
This year, election of new officers will be con-
ducted by mail ballot.
A recent survey of member interests produced
lists of 20 and 30 persons, respectively, interested
in participating in the Science Teacher Substitute
Program and in S’cience Fair judging. These lists
have been passed along to the Joint Board, ac-
companying a donation toward the financing of
the Board. The Chapter contemplates making a
certificate and gift award in its area to a local
Science Fair winner.
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
“The Polaris Submarine” was described by
Cmdr. G. F. Moran at the April 11 meeting,
attended by local members and by members of
the National Marine Transportation Committee
of the national organization, then meeting in
Washington.
Election of officers for the coming year took
place at the April general meeting.
Two technical discussion groups met in April :
on the 4th the Division on Communications heard
William Keister, Bell Telephone Laboratories,
speak on “Progress in Electronic Switching — a
System Trial at Morris, 111.”; and on the 18th the
Power Division discussed “System Planning for
Small Utilities and Large Industrial Plants.”
American Society of Civil Engineers, Na-
tional Capital Section
The Section met on March 28 as host to the
Washington Section of the Institute of Traffic
Engineers. At this time, Francis C. Turner,
Bureau of Public Roads, presented a current and
comprehensive view of the “National Highway
Program,” described as the “greatest public works
undertaking of all time.”
Col. J. H. Kerkering, Army Engineer Research
and Development Laboratories, spoke to the
group on April 6, at Ft. Belvoir, on “Camp
Century — City Under Ice.”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
Milton Slawsky, Air Force Office of Scientific
Research, on April 13 discussed “Plasma Accele-
ration” and problems involved in applying these
concepts to a propulsion system, based on current
research and development.
New officers, elected at the last meeting in
March, are Virgil L. Pence, chairman, John A.
Cannon, vice-chairman, Robert 0. Belsheim, sec-
retary, and John W. Abouchar, treasurer.
Botanical Society of Washington
Members of the Society met on April 4, at
5:30 p.m. for a tour of the National Arboretum,
followed by a picnic supper, and a discussion
by Director S’kinner and his staff of the facilities
and research program of the arboretum.
The final meeting, in May, will be the annual
banquet.
Chemical Society of Washington
A general meeting of the Society was held on
April 13 at the National Museum. Linus Pauling,
of California Institute of Technology, spoke on
“The Structure of Electron-Deficient Substances.”
Entomological Society of Washington
Two papers comprised the Society program on
April 6. The first, by Maj. R. M. Altman, Walter
Reed Army Institute of Research, concerned “The
Army Program of Insect Control in Panama,” and
the second, by A. M. Heimpel of USDA, dealt
with “Use of Microorganisms in the Control of
Forest Insects.”
Geological Society of Washington
Officers for 1961 are: President — C. Arthur
Cooper; vice presidents — Harold M. Bannerman
and Charles L. McGuinness; treasurer — Margaret
Cooper; secretaries — Frank C. Whitmore, Jr., and
John T. Hack.
The 822nd meeting of the Society, April 12.
heard papers by T. P. Thayer, Geological Survey,
on “Some Glimpses of the World Chromite Situa-
tion, Economic and Otherwise”; Catherine W.
Skinner, NIH, on “Precipitation of Dolomite in
South Australia”; and Philip H. Abelson and
Thomas C. Hoering, Carnegie Institute, on “Frac-
tionation of Carbon Isotopes by Living Matter.”
Helminthological Society of Washington
On April 21, the following program was pre-
sented to the S’ociety at the Johns Hopkins
University School of Hygiene and Public Health.
Baltimore :
“Rous Sarcoma in the Embryonated Egg with
Special Reference to Endothelium,” by Helen V.
Coates; “Studies in Pathogenicity of Eimeria
acervulina in Chickens,” by Stuart M. Krassner;
and “Population Density Influence on Changes
in the Chemical Composition of Hymenolepis
diminuta During its Growth in the Definitive
Host,” by Larry S. Roberts. Four additional con-
tributions were grouped under the general head-
May, 1961
85
ing, “Introduction to the Laboratory of Parasite
Biochemistry.”
Insecticide Society of Washington
“Nucleic Acid,” was discussed by Norman
Mitlin, IJSDA, on April 19 before the Society, ac-
companying a paper by J. R. Foster, University
of Maryland, on “Maryland Mosquito Control
Program.”
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
What is described as an “outstanding advance”
and an “amazing device,” the Optical Maser, was
discussed before the Section on April 10 by
Donald F. Nelson of the Bell Telephone Labora-
tories. Apparently, this instrument is capable of
producing a coherent, parallel beam of great
intensity. Some of the scientific and technological
uses of the ruby optical maser were demonstrated.
The Professional Group on Microwave Theory
and Technics, meeting on April 11, heard C. T.
McCoy of the P h i 1 c o Corporation, speak on
“Spectrum Utility in Space Communication.”
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
In addition to its customary lengthy roster of
medical events for the month, we received an
early notice of a hobby show, or Doctors Hobby
Exhibit, to be a feature of the 29th Annual
Scientific Assembly, Statler-Hilton Hotel, on No-
vember 27-29 of this year. Apparently any hobby,
provided it lends itself to exhibiting, is eligible
and provision made for safekeeping overnight of
valuable items.
We note, too, solicitation from members of
nominations for the John Benjamin Nichols
Award to a lay person or organization, or both,
in recognition of unusual enterprise or service
in the interest of better health for the people of
the District. The award, a bronze plaque, must
be to a recipient whose income is not derived
from activity in the health field; it was estab-
lished eight years ago by the Executive Board of
the Society.
Philosophical Society of Washington
“Coesite and Craters” was the title of a talk
by E. C. T. Chao, Geological Survey, on April 14.
Society for Experimental Biology and Medi-
cine, District of Columbia Section
A series of four papers made up the March 30
program, each scheduled for 15 minutes:
“Carcinogenesis in the Newborn,” Roger
0‘Gara, NIH; “Biochemical Studies of the Chick
Edema Disease,” D. F. Flick and Linda Gallo.
FDA; “The Effect of Neo-Natal Cross Deimmuni-
zation on Tumor Transplant Susceptibility in
Mice,” J. M. Bailey and Keith Merrill, GWU;
and “Transfer of Iron from Synthetic Iron-Bind-
ing Chelates to Rabbit Reticulocytes.” G.
Shashaty, E. J. Zapolski, M. Rubin, and J. V.
Princiotto, GU.
Society of American Bacteriologists, Wash-
ington Branch
The annual meetings of the parent organiza-
tion, held in Chicago April 23-27, made it advis-
able to cancel the Branch meeting for that
month.
Society of American Foresters, Washington
Section
On March 16, H. A. Fowells gave an illustrated
lecture on his recent trip around the world, under
the title “Jet’s Eye View of Forestry Around the
World.” The April field trip will be the last
meeting of the Section until next fall.
Washington Society of Engineers
The last meeting of the Society, on April 19,
featured A. G. McNish of NBS in a talk on “Our
System for Standards of Measurement,” showing
the trend to use of physical constants for this
purpose.
It is expected that the biannual Roster will
be completed and mailed very shortly.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Events which will take place, so far as we can
determine at the time of writing, subsequent to
the appearance of the Journal are noted below.
Where possible, the nature of the program is
indicated; in many instances the entry merely
notes date and place of a regularly-scheduled
meeting of the organization named. Last-minute
changes in time and place, or emergency can-
cellations, may in certain instances alter the situa-
tion. At this time of year, too, certain local groups
suspend formal meeting activities for the summer
months.
May 8 — Institute of Radio Engineers, Wash-
ington Section
Museum of Natural History, 8:00 p.m.
May 9 — American Institute of Electrical
Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
May 9 — American Society of Civil Engineers,
National Capital Section
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
Presentation of slate of candidates for office.
May 10 — A m e r i c a n Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
National Officers Night. W. A. Pennington,
national president, will speak on "Diffusion and
Transport of Carbon in Ferrous Alloys.”
AAUW Headquarters, 2401 Virginia Ave., N.W..
8:00 p.m. Dinner, 6:30 p.m.
May 10 — Geological Society of Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
May 10 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Meeting of Professional Group on Electron
Devices.
86
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
May 11 — Chemical Society of Washington
Annual “meeting-in-miniature.”
University of Maryland. Dinner in University
Dining Hall, 6:30 p.m. ($2.75). Divisional ses-
sions in Nathan L. Drake Lecture Hall of Chem-
istry, 8:15 p.m.
May 11 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
May 12 — Philosophical Society of Washing-
ton
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
May 15 — Society of American Military Engi-
neers, Washington Post
Regular meeting combined with the annual
meeting of the National Society of American
Military Engineers.
May 16 — Anthropological Society of Wash-
ington
Business meeting of the Society.
Room 43, U. S. National Museum, 8:15 p.m.
May 16 — Institute of the Aeronautical
Sciences, Washington Section
Thomas Finch, Flight Test Center, NASA, “The
X-15, A Vehicle for Advanced Research.”
Occidental Restaurant. Dinner, 6:00 p.m.; meet-
ing, 8:00 p.m.
May 15-17 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Microwave Theory and
Technics National Symposium, Sheraton-P ark
Hotel.
May 16 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Space Electronics and
Telemetry.
May 17 — Insecticide Society of Washington
L. D. Christenson, “Tropical Fruit Fly Popula-
tion-Sterilization Research in Mexico, Hawaii, and
the Western Pacific”; and E. F. Knipling, “Com-
ments on Possibilities of Applying the Sterile
Male Principle to the Control of Other Insects.”
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
May 18 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Antennas and Propaga-
tion.
May 22 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Broadcasting. Elton
Davis, FCC, “Automation of Directional Antenna
Computation by FCC.”
May 23 — American Society of Civil Engi-
neers, National Capital Section
Luncheon meeting.
YWCA, 12:00 noon.
May 23 — Anthropological Society of Wash-
ington
Margaret Mead, American Museum of Natural
History, “Theory and Methodology in the Study
of Human Behavior.”
Room 43, U. S. National Museum, 8:15 p.m.
May 23 — Society of American Bacteriolog-
ists, Washington Branch
G. P. Gladstone, Oxford University and NIH,
“Staphylococcal Leucocidins.”
Sternberg Auditorium, Walter Reed, 8:00 p.m.
May 24 — Geological Society of Washington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
May 24 Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Professional Group on Engineering Writing
and Speech, joint meeting with Society of Techni-
cal Writers and Publishers.
May 25 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
Meeting in area of product engineering.
PEPCO Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
May 26 — Philosophical Society of Wash-
ington
John Wesley Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
The following meetings, scheduled for
June, have come to our attention:
June 1 — American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Washington Section
Fuels symposium.
June 1 — Society for Experimental Biology
and Medicine, District of Columbia Section
Annual dinner meeting.
June 12-13 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Third National Symposium on RFI.
June 26-28 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
Washington Section
Fifth National Symposium on Military Com-
munications.
ACADEMY ACTIVITIES
APRIL BOARD MEETING
The Board of Managers held its 537th meeting
on April 4 at the National Academy of Sciences,
with President Abelson presiding. The minutes
of the 536th meeting were approved with minor
corrections.
Dr. Abelson discussed briefly the release of
the Academy’s full-time employee as of March
31, and its impact on the offices of secretary
and treasurer. He indicated that for the time
being, the S’cience Calendar would be main-
tained in the director’s office at the Geophysical
Laboratory; and the phone in the Academy office
will be answered by Mr. Carroll of the Joint
Board on Science Education, until other arrange-
ments can be made. Mr. Detwiler pointed out
May, 1961
that maintenance of the Academy’s mailing list
was of great concern to the Journal; it was agreed
that the secretary, treasurer, and editor would
meet to set up procedures for handling the mail-
ing list.
For the Meetings Committee, Dr. Abelson an-
nounced a special meeting of the Academy had
been scheduled for April 6, at which Herman
Kahn of the Rand Corporation would speak on
“Thinking About the Unthinkable,” with related
comments by Marquis W. Childs and Frank T.
McClure. At the regular meeting on April 20,
Father Francis J. Heyden of Georgetown Univer-
sity was scheduled to speak on “Astronomy Looks
to its Future.”
Dr. Robbins reported that the Membership
Committee had been drafting a statement on
criteria for membership in the Academy, but that
the statement was not yet ready for presentation
to the Board. She announced that the Commit-
tee’s roster of members was practically complete.
Dr. Robbins then presented for first reading
the names of ten candidates for membership.
Dr. Campbell reported that the Policy and
Planning Committee had met on March 30, and
had discussed several topics, including (1) a
recent recommendation by a science committee
of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, that basic
and applied research in Government be aban-
doned; (2) Dr. Abelson’s suggestion that the
Board of Managers and the Joint Board on
Science Education might foster the indoctrina-
tion of secondary-school students in the detection
and estimation of radiation hazards, through
training in the use of radiation monitoring de-
vices; and (3) the encouragement of interest
on the part of the Columbia Historical Society
in the history of science in the Washington area.
Recommendations concerning the first two topics
may be brought before the Board at a subsequent
meeting. Concerning the third topic. Dr. McPher-
son has volunteered to pursue the matter with
the Columbia Historical Society.
Dr. Campbell suggested that the Academy
should have a liaison with the Washington Board
of Trade, specifically to get acquainted with the
plans and planners of the National Cultural
Center.
In the absence of Dr. Brenner of the Commit-
tee on Encouragement of Science Talent, the
secretary read Dr. Brenner’s report on the dinner
held March 16 for superior science students and
their teachers, and his recommendations for con-
duct of next year’s dinner.
Following the second reading of their names,
the following persons were elected to member-
ship in the Academy: Mattie R. Fox, Albert L.
Ryall, and Romald E. Bowles.
Dr. Campbell presented an extensive report
on the organization and operations of the New
York Academy of Sciences.
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
Eleven young scientists are now conduct-
ing advanced basic studies at the National
Bureau of Standards under the Postdoctoral
Resident Research Associate program. This
program is sponsored jointly by the National
Academy of Sciences — National Research Coun-
cil and the Bureau; it is now in its seventh
year. The plan provides advanced training in
research for creative young scientists who have
shown promise of leadership in fundamental re-
search. Besides training, the program provides
for a “cross-fertilization” of ideas, bringing the
benefits of the scientist’s new approaches and the
results of his research to the organizations at
which the research is performed and at which
the scientist ultimately associates on a permanent i
basis. Research associateships have been awarded
to 44 young men in the six years the plan has
been in effect at NBS. Fourteen of the first 31
applied and were accepted as permanent members
of the staff. The Naval Research Laboratory has
a similar program.
According to F. W. Reichelderfer, chief of
the Weather Bureau, a new weather ex-
change linking the United States and Japan
as part of an improved weather communica-
tions network was scheduled to begin opera-
tion on March 1. Installation of the point-to-
point radio teletypewriter circuit between Tokyo
and Honolulu will complete the Northern Hemi-
sphere Exchange Program started October 1,
1960. Five Northern Hemisphere Exchange Cen-
ters located at New York, Frankfurt, Moscow,
New Delhi, and Tokyo, and connected by land-
line and radio teletypewriter make it possible to
receive weather data from the entire Northern
Hemisphere at any regularly designated dissemi- i
nation points. The next phase of the program
will be the establishment of a similar network in
the Southern Hemisphere, connected with the
Northern Hemisphere network. Organization of
this system is the result of several years of co-
ordination and planning by members of the World |
Meteorological Organization and Agency of the |
United Nations.
A National Oceanographic Data Center
was established January 16 with administra-
tive headquarters at the U. S. Hydrographic
Office. It is sponsored jointly by the Department
of the Navy, Department of Commerce, Depart- jf|
ment of Interior, Atomic Energy Commission, I
and the National Science Foundation. It will |
serve as a repository for data on the physics, I
chemistry, biology, geology and meteorology of h
the oceans. It will prepare and publish indexes, I
summaries, and tabulations showing annual and d
seasonal oceanographic conditions, and promote I
the routine collection of ocean-wide survey data.
88
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
Philosophical Society of Washington
Anthropological Society of Washington
Biological Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
Entomological Society of Washington
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Columbia Historical Society
Botanical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Washington Society of Engineers
American Institute of Electrical Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Helminthological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
American Society for Metals
International Association for Dental Research
Institute of the Aerospace Sciences
American Meteorological Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Acoustical Society of America
American Nuclear Society
Lawson M. McKenzie
Regina Flannery Herzfeld
Herbert Friedmann
John L. Torgesen
William E. Bickley
Alexander Wetmore
Margaret D. Foster
Frederick 0. Coe
U. S. Grant, III
Harold T. Cook
G. Flippo Gravatt
Howard S. Rappleye
William A. Geyger
William G. Allen
Doys A. Shorb
Mary Louise Robbins
Robert D. Huntoon
Douglas E. Parsons
Kathryn Knowlton
John A. Bennett
Gerhard Brauer
Francois N. Frenkiel
Jack Thompson
Milton S. Schechter
Richard K. Cook
Urner Liddel
Volume 51
MAY 1961
No. 5
CONTENTS
Page
On the Problems of Mineralogy 69
The Amateur and the Academy 77
Academy Receives NSF Grant 79
Special WAS Meeting Draws Crowd BO
MAY MEETING B1
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News B2
Affiliated Societies ; BS
Calendar of Events B6
Academy Activities B7
Science and Development BS
Washington Academy of Sciences 2nd Class Postage
1530 — P St., N.W. Paid at
Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
1 l f| $ * R Y Cf hRtiQU)
4U80-HTUVI
2 2 DIVINITY A V E J
CAMBRIDGE 38 MASS »AS
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
>*#♦
Vol. 51 • No. 6
OCTOBER 1961
. z-5
tfi
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Moddie D. Taylor, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
OFFICERS OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
President: Philip H. Abelson, Geophysical Laboratory
President-Elect: Benjamin D. Van Evera, George Washington University
Secretary: Heinz Specht, National Institutes of Health
Treasurer: Norman F. Braaten, Coast and Geodetic Survey
Some Symbiotic Relations
Between Saproglyphid Mites
And Solitary Vespid Wasps
(Acarina, Saproglyphidae and Hymenoptera, Vespidae)
Karl V. Krombein
Entomology Research Division, U. S. Department of Agriculture
Several families of mites contain species
that are parasites of solitary wasps and
bees. Some of these mites, such as several
species of Py emotes ( Trombidiformes, Pye-
motidae), kill and feed on the more or less
helpless immature stages of many insects.
Other species belonging to the genera
Lackerbaueria, Tortonia, and Horstia (Sar-
coptiformes, Acaridae) or Chaetodactylus
(Sarcoptiformes, Chaetodactylidae) , have
as host one or only a few species of solitary
wasps or bees. Usually the adult mites be-
longing to these genera kill the host egg or
larva and then develop and multiply as
scavengers on the food stored by the
mother wasp or bee. However, in at least
one other family, species belonging to gen-
era such as Vespacarus, Monobiacarus, En-
sliniella, and Kennethiella (Sarcoptiformes,
Saproglyphidae) have developed a very
complex symbiotic relation with solitary
Avasps of the family Vespidae. The sapro-
glyphid mites are nearly always host
specific, each mite species occurring on
only one species of vespid wasp.
I have observed the life history of some
saproglyphid mites during my studies of
the solitary wasps that can be induced to
nest in borings in wooden sticks. These arti-
ficial nesting sites are made in sticks of
straight-grained pine % by % by 6V2
inches. A boring 6 inches long having a
diameter of 3/16, }4, or Y2 inch is drilled
in each of the sticks. The traps are made up
into bundles of six, each containing one or
* Adapted from an address before the Ento-
mological Society of Washington, March 2, 1961.
two borings of each diameter. The bundles
are set out horizontally in situations where
wood-nesting solitary wasps are likely to
search for nesting sites. Since vespid wasps
do not gnaw out borings but merely take
over abandoned borings of some other in-
sect, usually those of beetles, these traps
offer very desirable nesting sites. The most
productive settings are on sound dead
trunks or limbs containing abandoned
beetle borings or on exterior structural
timber containing similar borings. After
completion the nest may be brought into
the laboratory, split open, and observa-
tions made on the life history of the occu-
pants.
Life History of the Host Vespid Wasps
Species of Stenodynerus subg. Parancis-
trocerus, Ancistrocerus, and Monobia serve
as hosts of Vespacarus, Kennethiella, and
Monobiacarus. These wasps are similar in
the main details of their life history. The
female selects a boring of suitable diameter,
3/ 16 or V4, inch for Stenodynerus and
Ancistrocerus, Y2 inch for Monobia. She
suspends her sausage-shaped egg by a slen-
der thread from the ceiling of the boring
near the inner end. Then she hunts for a
caterpillar, paralyzes it by stinging, and
flies with it to the nest. This caterpillar is
stuffed into the inner end of the boring,
and the wasp departs to hunt another. This
process continues until about six to eight
caterpillars have been stored. Then the
wasp constructs a partition of agglutinated
sand grains or mud several millimeters
October, 1961
89
90
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
thick across the boring, to seal off that cell.
Then another cell is stored, and so forth,
until the boring is filled with a linear series
of 4 to 10 cells. Frequently the wasp builds
an empty vestibular cell between the last
stored cell and the outer end of the boring,
and sometimes, as in Monobia, she may
build an empty intercalary cell between
each of the stored cells.
The egg hatches in from two to four days
and the legless, maggot-like larva devours
in four to seven days all of the caterpillars
stored for it. The mature larva spins a deli-
cate silken cocoon which completely en-
closes the larva in Stenodynerus and And-
strocerus, and consists of just a vestigial
cap in Monobia. The meconium (accumu-
lated fecal wastes) is voided into the poste-
rior end of the cocoon, and the larva be-
comes a quiescent resting form. In the
summer generation or generations pupation
occurs four to seven days after completion
of the cocoon, but in the overwintering
generation the wasp overwinters as a dia-
pausing larva and transforms into a pupa
the following spring. The pupal stage lasts
10 to 17 days. After casting the pupal
exuvia, the adult remains in the cell several
days while the integument hardens. The
wasps then chew through the cell partitions,
leave the nest, mate, and begin another
reproductive cycle.
The Acarinarium
The hypopi (resting stage) of saprogly-
phid mites occupy a specialized area called
an acarinarium (fig. 1) on or in the body
of the adult vespid wasps. The hypopi (fig.
Figure 1. — Stenodynerus (Parancistrocerus)
saecularis rufulus (mites have been removed from
right half of acarinarium at base of second ab-
dominal segment), 10X. Figure 2. — Vespacarus
saecularis hypopus, ventral aspect, the symbiont
of Stenodynerus saecularis rufulus , 106X. Figures
3-6. — Stenodynerus ( Parancistrocerus) fulvipes
fulvipes and its mite, Vespacarus fulvipes. Figure
3. — Young pupa with several gravid female mites
and a few eggs, 7X. Figure 4. — Gravid female mite
and eggs on head of pupa, 17X. Figure 5. — Mite
eggs on head of pupa, 17X. Figure 6. — Mite
nymphs on head of pupa, 24X. (Drawings by
Arthur D. Cushman , photographs by the author.)
October, 1961
2) cluster on or in this area in regular,
shingled rows and attach to the host or to
each other by a ventral suctorial plate on
the apex of the abdomen. The acarinarium
may consist of just the flattened, polished
lateral and posterior surfaces of the propo-
deum (hind part of the thorax) as in Ancis-
trocerus antilope which has as its symbiont
Kennethielia triselosa. Or, the mites may
cluster on the ventral side of the apical
margin of one or more of the apical abdom-
inal terga as does Vespacarus tigris, the
symbiont of Ancistrocerus tigris. Or, there
may be a definite internal chamber as in
Stenodynerus subg. Parancistrocerus and
Monobia which harbor other species of
Vespacarus and Monobiacarus. This cham-
ber is formed by the depressed anterior
part of the second abdominal tergum which
is normally covered by the apex of the first
tergum except when the abdomen is flexed
downward.
Life History of the Saproglyphid Mites
The developmental stages of the mites
consist of the egg, a six-legged larva, an
eight-legged first nymph or protonymph, an
eight-legged second or deutonymph usually
called the hypopus in sarcoptiform mites,
an eight-legged third or tritonymph, and
adult females and males. The larva, proto-
nymph, tritonymph, and adult have func-
tional mouthparts. The deutonymph (hy-
popus) is a resting stage; it lacks mouth-
parts and has a suctorial plate on the venter
of the abdomen by which it attaches to the
adult host.
The mites are much smaller than the host
wasps. Most Stenodynerus adults normally
range from 8 to 12mm. in length. The hy-
popi of various species of Vespacarus , the
parasites of Stenodynerus , range from 215
to 275/a in length ; adult males may be 320
to 530/a long and gravid females from 530
to 815/a. Monobia is a larger wasp, adults
usually measuring 15 to 20 mm. in length.
Its parasite, Monobiacarus, has hypopi only
250/a long, but the adults are veritable
giants, the male being 770/a and gravid fe-
males 1150 to 1450 /a in length.
91
As in any successful symbiotic relation,
the mite has adjusted its developmental cy-
cle perfectly to that of the host wasp. The
rhythmic pulsation of the wasp’s abdomen
during movement of the egg from the ovi-
duct prior to oviposition may be the signal
for as many as 20 hypopi to leave the
wasp’s body and drop off in the cell. Trans-
formation of the mites to the tritonymphal
and adult stages takes place in the interval
of a few days between oviposition by the
wasp and completion of feeding by the
wasp larvae. The adult mites are on the
wasp larva as it begins to spin, and they are
enclosed in the finished cocoon. They begin
to feed on the wasp larva as soon as it has
voided the meconium and has assumed the
quiescent form. In heavy infestations by
saproglyphid mites the resting wasp larva
is literally peppered with tiny black feeding
punctures. However, I have never observed
that this feeding is injurious to the wasp.
The engorged adult female mite ceases
feeding and begins to lay eggs as soon as
the wasp transforms to the pupal stage
(figs. 3-4). Since the period between void-
ing of the meconium and pupation may be
only several days for the summer genera-
tions to a number of months for the over-
wintering generation, it is necessary to pos-
tulate some factor in the wasp’s develop-
ment that initiates ovulation in the female
mite. It seems most probable that this fac-
tor may be the cessation in production of
the juvenile hormone at the time when the
wasp pupa begins to develop within the last
larval skin. The growth and differentiation
hormone present in the body fluids of the
wasp during this developmental period may
then stimulate ovulation in the female mite
when she feeds on these fluids.
The mite eggs are ovoid (fig. 5), those
of V espacarus being 150-170/x long and
90-110//, wide, and those of Monobiacarus
about 200x100//,. The species of V espaca-
rus deposit their eggs around the mouth-
parts and legs of the newly transformed
wasp pupa, whereas Monobiacarus lays its
eggs on the cell walls and partitions. A
gravid female mite may lay up to 20 eggs
over a period of 10 to 15 days.
The six-legged larvae of V espacarus
hatch 6 to 15 days after oviposition, de-
pending on nest temperatures. They are
slightly larger than the eggs, ranging from
125-200//, long and 55-155/x wide, and have
an ovoid shape. The larvae transform to
eight-legged protonymphs (fig. 6) in less
than 2 days. These nymphs are larger than
the larvae, ovoid in shape, and range from
250-300//, long and 150-165/x, wide. Both
the larvae and protonymphs wander more
or less freely over the body of the pupa.
Most of the mites are in the protonymph-
al stage when the adult wasp is ready to
shed the pupal exuvia, about 17 to 21 days
after pupation occurs. As eclosion draws
near, the mites cluster on the venter of the
wasp around the mouthparts and legs. They
are shed along with the pupal exuvia, and
in a very brief time transform to the deuto-
nymphal state (hypopus). The hypopus
(fig.2) has an oval, flattened, more sclero-
tized body. Those of V espacarus range
from 215 to 320//, in length.
The V espacarus hypopi soon leave the
pupal exuvia, clamber on to the tip of the
wasp’s abdomen, and crawl forward on the
dorsum until they reach the apical margin
of the depressed acarinarium at the base of
the second abdominal segment. Then the
hypopi turn around and back into the aca-
rinarium. As additional hypopi perform
this same maneuver they come to lie in
shingled rows until the acarinarium is full.
The mites are then ready to infest a new
nest if they happen to be on a female in-
stead of a male wasp.
The mite Kennethiella trisetosa has a
more complex relationshio with its host.
Ancistrocerus antilope *. The female wasp
larva eats the adult mites in the cell with it
before spining a cocoon, but the male wasp
does not harm the mites in its cell. Conse-
quently, when the adult wasps leave the
nests only the males are infested with hy-
* Cooper, K. W. “Venereal Transmission of
Mites by Wasps, and Some Evolutionary Problems
Arising; from the Remarkable Association of En-
sliniella trisetosa with the Wasp Ancistrocerus
antilope .” Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 80, 119-174
(19551 .
92
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
popi which cluster on the hind part of the
thorax instead of in a specialized internal
chamber. When an infested male wasp
mates with a female, some of these mites
stream down the abdomen of the male and
enter the genital chamber of the female,
from whence they can infest each cell as the
egg is laid.
Academy Membership
Increase Urged
Mary L. Robbins
Chairman , WAS Committee on Membership.
The Washington Academy of Sciences is
the only organization which can speak and
act for the entire metropolitan scientific
community. To enable the Academy to
realize its potential for service, its mem-
bership must be increased. At present its
members represent only a fraction of those
eligible in the area. As one way of reach-
ing this large group of scientists, the Com-
mittee on Membership is appealing to each
member of the Academy to recommend for
membership those of his colleagues whom
he considers to be eligible.
The current criteria for eligibility for
membership represent the Committee’s in-
terpretation of the Bylaw reading, “Active
members shall be persons who by reason
of original research or scientific attainment
are deemed worthy of the honor of elec-
tion.”
To meet the requirement for original re-
search, a candidate must have had several
years’ experience and achieved recognition
in a scientific field. A younger nominee
must have a doctorate degree and several
original contributions in addition to his
thesis.
To meet the requirement of scientific at-
tainment, a candidate must be (1) an ad-
ministrator of a scientific program who
has achieved recognition in the direct ad-
ministration of the conduct of research;
(2) a person who has achieved recognition
as a distinguished editor or leader in
science; (3) a teacher of science who has
achieved an outstanding record in the
teaching of science students or in behalf of
the science teaching professions; or (4)
a person who has demonstrated leadership
in a society affiliated with the Academy, as
evidenced by election to office, particularly
to the presidency, of such a society. A
nominee for election in any of these four
categories must have shown a satisfactory
degree of creativity or productivity.
In order to acquaint every member with
the process by which a nominee is elected,
the procedures are outlined below, fol-
lowed by the sections of Article II of the
Bylaws which pertain to election of mem-
bers.
The Committee on Membership sincerely
hopes that, with the aid of every active
member, a very significant increase in
membership in the Washington Academy
of Sciences will be achieved.
Procedures for Election of Members to the
Washington Academy of Sciences
1. a. A nomination, prepared on the offi- (usually) three members of the Academy
cial nomination form, is endorsed by (one “sponsor” and at least one, usually
October, 1961
93
two. ‘‘endorsers”) . At least one sponsor
must have knowledge of the nominee’s field.
b. With the exception of the citation, the
form may be filled out by the nominee.
c. The citation must be prepared by one
of the sponsors, who may receive advice
from other members of the Academy if he
wishes.
2. The nomination, with supporting ma-
terial, is submitted to the chairman of the
Committee on Membership.
3. The chairman submits the nomination
to the chairman of the appropriate panel
for consideration and recommendation.
The panels, each consisting of five mem-
bers including the panel chairman, are as
follows :
a. Agricultural Sciences
b. Chemistry
c. Earth Sciences
d. General Biology
e. Mathematical Sciences
f. Medical Sciences
g. Physics and Astronomy
( h. A panel on Engineering is in the proc-
ess of establishment.)
If a nomination does not fit any of the
categories represented by the panels, it is
submitted directly to the Committee on
Membership.
All members of the panel, including the
chairman, vote on a nomination.
4. After consideration by the panel, the
nomination is returned to the committee
chairman with the recommendation of the
panel.
5. a. If the nomination is approved by
the panel, it is then presented to the Com-
mittee on Membership (usually represented
by the chairmen of the various panels) for
consideration and recommendation. Each
member present at the meeting votes for or
against recommending the nominee for
election. The chairman votes only in case
of a tie.
b. If the panel recommends against elec-
tion, the chairman of the Committee con-
tacts the sponsor to give him an oppor-
tunity to withdraw the nomination. If the
sponsor elects not to withdraw the nomina-
tion, he may submit it directly to the Board
of Managers of the Academy.
c. If the panel is unable to reach a de-
cision, the nomination is submitted to the
Committee on Membership for considera-
tion and recommendation as in 5 a above.
6. a. If the nomination is approved by
the Committee on Membership, it is pre-
sented to the Board of Managers by the
chairman of the Committee (the so-called
“First Reading”).
b. If the nomination is not approved by
the Committee on Membership, the pro-
cedure outlined in 5 b above is followed.
7. At least one week after receiving the
nomination ( usually at the next monthly
meeting ) , the Board of Managers votes for
or against election of the nominee. Three-
fourths of the votes cast must be in favor
of election.
8. a. The secretary of the Academy noti-
fies the nominee of his election and informs
him that formal membership is attained
after payment of the appropriate portion
of the annual dues for the current year.
Election becomes void if the person elected
does not pay the dues within three months,
or satisfactorily explain his failure to do
so.
b. If a nominee is rejected by the Board
of Managers, the secretary notifies the
sponsor and informs him that a rejected
candidate is not eligible for re-nomination
within one year from the date of rejection.
9. Upon receipt of the dues, the secretary
sends the new member the certificate of
membership in the Washington Academy
of Sciences.
Bylaws of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Article II — Membership (Sections 1 through 4 only)
Section 1. The membership shall consist (including those in life and emeritus
of three general classes: active members status), honorary members, and patrons.
94
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Section 2. Nominations for active mem-
bership shall be presented in writing at a
meeting of the Board of Managers, each
endorsed by at least two members of the
Academy, one of whom shall have knowl-
edge of the nominee’s field. They shall be
accompanied by a statement of the quali-
fications of the nominee and a list of his
more important scientific publications and
activities.
Section 3. Election to active membership
shall be by vote of the Board of Managers.
Final action on nominations shall be de-
ferred at least one week after presentation
to the Board and three-fourths of the vote
cast shall be necessary to elect. An election
to active membership shall be void if the
person elected does not within three months
thereafter pay his dues or satisfactorily ex-
plain his failure to do so.
Section 4. Active members shall be per-
sons who by reason of original research
or scientific attainment are deemed worthy
of the honor of election to Academy mem-
bership. They shall be classed as resident
and non-resident, those living within 25
miles of the White House, Washington,
D. C., being considered resident members.
The number of active members shall not
exceed 1500, of whom not more than 1200
shall be resident members, provided that
non-resident may become resident mem-
bers regardless of this limitation.
What Is the Best Value?
William J. Youden
National Bureau of Standards
The accurate measurement of physical
constants is a challenging and exacting
task. To that end, the investigator directs
his skills to the refinement of his appara-
tus and to the detection and elimination
of sources of error in his measurements.
Preoccupation with these endeavors may
make it necessary to discard many meas-
urements, otherwise the average will not
truly represent the situation. The kind
of problem that may arise will be illus-
trated by a hypothetical investigation of
the gravity constant, g. For simplicity,
assume that g will be estimated from meas-
urements made with a falling object.
Let us assume that the falling object
is a vertical rod with three lines engraved
on it, and that the distances between these
lines have been carefully measured. The
time intervals required for these lines to
pass a given point are now measured. We
may suppose that a multitude of precau-
tions have been taken and that repeated
drops have been recorded. Let us also
assume that the experimenter is fortunate
in possessing a second rod. Careful meas-
urements on this second rod show that the
distances between the lines on this rod
are slightly different from those on the
first rod. Nevertheless, when allowance
is made for the values of the distances in
the calculations, the average value for g
obtained with the second rod should check
the average value for g obtained with the
first rod. For the sake of argument let
the two averages, each based on the same
number of drops, differ substantially more
than is compatible with the precision of
the measurements. The precision is based
on measurements made with the same rod
and apparently there is no difference in
the two estimates of the precision. No
change in the apparatus has been made
other than the substitution of one rod for
the other, therefore the difference in the
two estimates for g may be ascribed to
small uncertainties in the values assigned
to the distances between the lines on the
rods.
We now have two values for g, and no
reason to believe that the distances on
October, 1961
95
one rod are more accurately known than
the distances on the other rod. The ob-
vious and proper “best” estimate for g,
from these data, is obtained by “splitting
the difference”, i.e., taking the average
of the two estimates, giving equal weight
to the value obtained with each rod. This
is an important rule and it should be
adhered to in obtaining the best value
from a collection of data.
Suppose that the investigator is indeed
fortunate in that he also has available a
second clock for measuring the time for
the drop. For convenience, designate the
two rods by R and r and the two clocks by
C and c. There is a well-established prac-
tice of changing but one variable at a
time, because this is the obvious way to
detect the effect of changing a variable.
Obvious it may be but, as we will see, it
is usually not the best way. The experi-
menter may or may not change back to
the first rod while he tries a third series
of drops with the second clock. It really
does not matter in this case, and we list
the symbols that are associated with the
three series of measurements.
First series of drops RC
Second " " " rC
Third " " " Rc
Let the average for clock C differ from
the average for clock c, the same rod being
used, just as different averages were ob-
tained for the two rods, using the same
clock. The problem confronting the experi-
menter now is to compute an average that
will give equal weight to the two clocks
and also give equal weight to the two rods.
Try as you may you will find no alternative
to taking the average of the second and
third series. (If the third series had been
rc, the first and third series should be taken
for the average. One series has to be dis-
carded, in either event.) We presume that
changing clocks or rods does have a small
effect on the result. Indeed, the averages
for the series are most unlikely to be identi-
cal and some averaging process is appro-
priate. The investigation affords an esti-
mate of the effect of changing a variable
by taking the difference between the first
and second series for the rods and between
the first and third series for the clocks.
The best average to report is the average
of the second and third series. These two
series clearly give equal weight to both
rods and both clocks.
We now point out that if the fourth pos-
sible combination, rc, is also run as a
series, the amount of information is dou-
bled in all respects. Let the average for
a series be denoted by the symbols identi-
fying the series.
Effect of rod change
rC -f“ rc
2
Effect of clock change
RC 4- rC
2
Rc 4“ rc
2
Best average
RC 4“ rc 4- Rc + Cr
4
Here the effect of changing a variable is
obtained by taking the difference between
averages of two series, and the best average
is the average of all four series.
The complications increase if a third
variable is studied for a possible effect
upon the results. In this hypothetical case,
we propose that two observers, O and o,
share the burden of making the measure-
ments. There are now three variables to
program. Listed below are three alternative
schedules for making the measurements.
In Schedule I only one variable is changed
at a time. After the second series of drops
has been made, the changed variable is re-
stored to its initial condition and another
variable changed. In Schedule II, once a
variable has been changed it is left at its
new value and a change made in some other
variable. Finally, in Schedule III each
series differs from the initial series in that
two variables are changed together.
Series Schedule I Schedule II Schedule III
We will now examine the three schedules
with particular attention to obtaining a best
96
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
average of the data. The presumption is
that there is nothing to guide one in choos-
ing between rods, or between observers or
between clocks. So the “best” value should
give equal weight to the results obtained
with the two rods, with the two observers,
and with the two clocks.
Schedule I comes off very badly indeed.
Denote the result obtained by any series
by the identifying symbols. The best aver-
ages are:
c ,, , T ROc + RoC + tOC - ROC
r or schedule 1
2
For Schedule II
ROC -f- roc
2
t? c , i i TrT ROC T" Roc -f- roC -f- rOc
ror Schedule 111
4
The governing rule is that there must
be equal numbers of capital and lower case
for each letter after the summation in the
numerator is accomplished. Thus Schedule
I suffers severely from the necessary sub-
traction of the result obtained with ROC.
Although after the subtraction, the numer-
ator is equivalent to the sum of just two
series, the errors of all four series are in-
volved. The net result is that this average
best value has the same precision as the
result from just one series. Schedule II
permits an average of two series and the
random error of a single series is conse-
quently divided by V2. Two of the series
do not contribute at all to the best average.
Schedule III provides a best value that is
a straight average of all four series, cutting
in half the random error of a single series.
Schedules I and II are both inferior to
Schedule III in detecting the effect of
changing any one of the variables. The
effect of changing a variable for the first
two schedules is revealed by taking the
difference between just two of the series.
Thus the effect of changing clocks is given
by the difference between the ROC result
and the ROc result. Such a difference has
V2 times the error of the result for a single
series. Schedule III makes it possible to
examine the effect of changing clocks by
comparing averages of two series. The dif-
ference between
ROC -V roC , Roc + rOc
— am‘ 2
gives the effect of changing clocks. Scrutiny
shows that the two series with clock C in-
volve both rods and both observers. The
same relation holds for the two series with
clock c. Consequently, these averages pro-
vide an unbiased comparison of the clocks.
The standard error associated with this dif-
ference between these averages is simply
the standard error for a single series. In
summary. Schedule III yields twice as
much information for the same number
of measurements as does Schedule II, and
has an even greater advantage over Sched-
ule I.
The importance of keeping in mind the
computations necessary to get the proper
and best estimate of the average, when two
or more variables have been examined, can
hardly be exaggerated. Imagine that the
two observers follow Schedule I and mis-
takenly take the simple average of the four
series as their estimate of the best value.
Now suppose that these same two observers
repeat the study using the identical appa-
ratus, but that they now follow Schedule II
because it avoids restoring a variable once
it has been changed. The simple average
for Schedule II will not converge on the
average obtained using Schedule I. For
example, three of the series in Schedule I
were made with clock C, whereas in Sched-
ule II, three of the series were made with
clock c. If there is a difference between
clocks, this biases the overall averages.
Rarely will the clocks be identical.
The averages for the three schedules, if
computed by the correct formulas given
above, will all converge upon the same
value. It is a fact, given a particular sys-
tem with certain choices available for the
variables, that there should be one value
and just one correct value associated with
the system. The correct formulas that do
estimate this one value show that Schedule
III has at least a two-fold advantage over
the more traditional Schedules I or II.
October, 1961
97
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical com-
mittees, civic activities, and marriages, births, and
other family news. Formal contributors are as-
signed for the systematic collection of news at
institutions employing considerable numbers of
Academy members (see list on masthead). How-
ever, for the bulk of the membership, we must
rely on individuals to send us news concerning
themselves and their friends. Contributions may
be addressed to Harold T. Cook, Associate Editor,
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Marketing Service, Room 2628 South Building,
Washington 25, D. C.
APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY
A. M. Stone gave a talk on “Plasma Dynam-
ics Research” on May 18, before U. S. Naval
Research Ordnance Company 5-11, at the Naval
Ordnance Laboratory, White Oak, Md. Dr. Stone
is technical assistant to the director at APL. He
also gave a lecture on “Thermonuclear Plasmas”
to the Naval Air Reserve Training Unit at Ana-
costia Air Station on May 6.
R. E. Gibson, director, addressed the Amer-
ican Institute of Chemists on “The Systems Ap-
proach to Research Management,” in Washington
on April 11. Dr. Gibson also gave a lecture at
Omaha, Neb., on May 4, on “Social and Economic
Effects of Scientific Progress” to the Conference
for Executives of Employment Security Agencies.
On May 24 he addressed the Maryland Science-
Industry Conference (convened by Gov. J. Mil-
lard Tawes) on “What Maryland Offers Science
Industries.”
A prize of $250 will be awarded to Archie I.
Mahan and L. P. Bone for the winning paper
entitled, “Far-Field Diffraction Properties of a
Plane-Parallel Plate When Placed Partially in
Front of a Rectangular Diffracting Aperture.” The
award will be presented at the meeting of the
Optical Society of America, October 18-20, at the
Hotel Biltmore in Los Angeles. Dr. Mahan is a
senior staff physicist and Mr. Bone an associate
mathematician at APL.
Alfred J. Zmuda was appointed to the Panel
on the World Magnetic Survey, a panel of the
Geophysics Research Board of the National
Academy of Sciences.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
Donald A. Rice, chief of the Gravity and
Astronomy Branch, Geodesy Division, attended
the Symposium on Gravity Reductions held by
the International Association of Geodesy at Cam-
bridge, England, July 24-28.
Dean S. Carder was elected president of the
Seismological Society of America, at a recent
meeting of that Society.
A paper by Dean S. Carder and W. V.
Mickey entitled “Ground Effects from Under-
ground Explosions” has been accepted for publi-
cation in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society
of America.
Elliott B. Roberts, assistant director for re-
search and development, Charles A. "Whitten,
chief of the Triangulation Branch, Geodesy Divi-
sion, and Dean S. Carder, chief seismologist of
the Geophysics Division, were delegates to the
7th General Assembly of PAIGH and the 9th
Pan American Consultation on Cartography, held
in Buenos Aires August 1-15. Captain Roberts
also attended the 10th Pacific Science Congress
at the University of Hawaii, August 21 to Sep-
tember 6.
HARRIS RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Alfred E. Brown, president and director of
research, presented a paper entitled “Physical,
Chemical and Mechanical Properties of Protein
Fibers” before the Protein Fiber Symposium at
the 19th annual meeting of the Electron Micro-
scope S’ociety of America, held in Pittsburgh,
August 23.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Stewart R. Cooper, professor of analytica
chemistry, retired last June. Dr. Cooper is teach-
ing half-time during the current year.
Lloyd N. Ferguson, professor and Depart-
ment head, is spending his sabbatical year at the
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology as a Na-
tional Science Foundation faculty fellow in the
laboratory of Professor V. Prelog.
Joseph B. Morris has been promoted from
assistant professor to associate professor.
Moddie D. Taylor, professor, has returned
from a year’s special leave. He was a Robert A.
Welch Foundation visiting scholar at Prairie View
(Tex.) A&M College during the past academic
year. During the summer he served as co-editor
of “Teachers Guide for Chemical Study.” Dr.
Taylor is acting head of the Chemistry Depart-
ment this year.
98
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
NAS-NRC
Paul D. Foote, executive secretary of the
NAS-NRC panels advisory to the National Bureau
of Standards, was awarded an honorary D.S. de-
gree by Western Reserve University on June 14.
John S. Coleman has taken the lead in staff
work at NAS-NRC for the Natural Resources
Research Study requested last spring by President
Kennedy. The study is now concerned with a com-
prehensive review of the problems and programs
of eight major areas, including water, energy,
plants and materials, the oceans, minerals, and
environment, as well as man’s cultural and recrea-
tional resources. It is expected to be completed
this year. The information and ideas will be as-
sembled in a comprehensive research plan for
the consideration of the President. Close liaison
is being maintained with the special Panel on
Natural Resources of the Federal Council for
Science and Technology.
Frank L. Campbell, associate editor of this
Journal, worries about the supply of feature
articles for the Journal and takes every opportu-
nity, including this news section, to solicit man-
uscripts. He was also asked to worry about the
contents of the AIBS Bulletin (American In-
stitute of Biological Sciences) and served as
chairman of an ad hoc committee to recommend
improvements.
As secretary general of the Pacific Science
Congress recently held in Honolulu, Harold J.
Coolidge was busy for months preparing for the
Congress, and finding ways and means to trans-
port participants from the mainland, and from
foreign countries, to Hawaii.
W. H. Larrimer organized and participated
in a Symposium on the Ecological Consequences
of the Use of Toxic Chemicals in Pest Control
at the Pacific Science Congress.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
The following talks have been given by mem-
j bers of the staff:
F. L. Alt: “Planning and Management of a
Mathematical Research and Service Facility” at
the Naval Research Reserve Seminar on Research
Planning Management, Princeton University,
August 25, and “Some New Developments in
Automatic Language Translations” at the Associa-
tion for Computing Machinery, Los Angeles,
September 5-8; L. M. Branscomb: “Physics of
; the Negative Ions” at the Physics Colloquium,
University of Washington, Seattle, August 23, and
“Radiative Formation and Destruction of Ions”
at the Fifth International Conference on Ioniza-
tion Phenomena in Gases, Sonderpostam Deut-
sches Museum, Munich, August 28-September 1;
H. P. Broida : “Double Wall Glass Dewars for
Optical and Other Studies at Liquid Helium Tem-
peratures” at the Fifth International Symposium
on Free Radicals, Institute of Physical Chemistry,
October, 1961
Uppsala, July 6-7; R. D. Elbourn: “Symbol
Manipulation, A New Career for Computers” at
the IRE Professional Group on Military Elec-
tronics, 5th National Military Electronics Con-
ference, Shorehum Hotel, Washington, June 27;
H.P.R. Frederikse: “The Properties of Elec-
trons in Rutile” at the Gordon Research Con-
ference on Solid State S’tudies of Ceramics, Mer-
iden, N. H., July 31- August 4.
Also, M. Greenspan: “The Measurement of
the Speed of Sound in the Ocean” at NATO,
through the University of Pennsylvania, Imperial
College, London, August 1; J. L. Hague: “Sepa-
rations in Analysis” at the American Society for
Testing Materials, Atlantic City, June 28; C. M.
Herzfeld: “The Crystal Field Approximation”
at the Institut Battelle, Centre de Recherche de
Geneve, Carouge-Geneve, Switzerland, July 18;
R. B. Hobbs: “International Standardization of
ISO/TC 6” at the Technical Association of the
Pulp and Paper Industry, Queen Elizabeth Hotel,
Montreal, Canada, August 17; A. G. McNish:
“The Science of Precise Measurement” to the
Officers of the Naval Weapons Plant, Washington,
July 10; H. L. Logan: “The S’pecimen for Use
in Investigating the Stress-Corrosion Cracking of
Metals at Elevated Temperatures” at the Amer-
ican Society for Testing Materials, Atlantic City,
June 28.
Also, S. B. Newman: “Microscopy of the
Color Phenomena in Polymer Failure” at the
General Motors Research Laboratories, General
Motors Technical Center, Warren, Mich., July
25; C. H. Page: “The Definition and Realiza-
tion of the Electrical Units” at the National
Bureau of Standards, Electronic Calibration Cen-
ter, Boulder Laboratories, Boulder, Colo., August
21; A. S. Posner: “Hydrogen Bonding in Syn-
thetic and Biological Apatites” at the Gordon
Conference on Bone and Tooth Structure, Kim-
ball Union Academy, Meriden, N. H.; I. Rhodes:
“The Teacher’s Role in the Age of Automation”
at the Summer Institute of the National Science
Foundation, College of William and Mary, Wil-
liamsburg, Va.. July 31; C. M. Sitterly: “The
Solar Spectrum” at the Department of Physics,
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis., August 7.
Also, W. J. Youden: “Physical Measurements
and Experiment Design” at the International
Statistical Institute, Paris, September 5, and
“Test Programs for the Statistical Evaluation of
Materials” at the Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Paris, September 6; and L. B.
Leter: “Temperature Dependence of Electron
Emission in the Field Emission Region” before
the Eighth Field Emission S'ymposium, Williams
College, Williamstown, Mass., August 28-30.
The following talks were presented before the
18th International Congress of Pure and Applied
Chemistry, Montreal, August 7-10: G. T. Furu-
kawa: “Calorimetric Determination at the Na-
tional Bureau of Standards of the Purity of
IUPAC-59 Samples of Benzene”; A. R. Glasgow,
99
Jr.: '’Purification, Controlled Contamination, and
Partition of IUPAC Cryometric Benzene Sam-
ples”; W. J. Hamer: “Theoretical Electromotive
Forces for Galvanic Cells Containing Molten
Halides”; and J. R. MeNesby: "Thermal De-
composition and Isomerization of Propyl and
Isobutyl Radicals.”
S. N. Alexander was moderator of the Session
on Computer Technology, IRE Professional Group
on Military Electronics, Fifth Military Electronics
Conference, Washington, June 26-28.
F. R. Caldwell was chairman of a panel
round table discussion on “Transient Tempera-
ture Measurements with Thermocouples in Missile
and Space Applications” at the American Society
for Testing Materials meeting in Atlantic City,
June 29.
Charles M. Herzfeld and W. A. Wildhack
have been appointed associate directors of NBS.
Floyd Buckley has been promoted to assistant
chief of the Physical Chemistry Division.
Harry C. Allen, Jr., has been appointed
chief of the Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry
Division.
NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
William A. Zisman, superintendent of the
Chemical Division, received the National Award
for 1961 from the American Society of Lubrica-
tion Engineers at its annual meeting in Phil-
adelphia last April. This award was in recogni-
tion of Dr. Zisman’s many contributions to a
better understanding of lubrication theory.
At a meeting of an IUPAC committee in Mon-
treal during the first week in August, Dr. Zis-
man was appointed secretary to the newly estab-
lished International Commission on Colloid and
S’urface Chemistry, under the Physical Chemical
Section of IUPAC.
Ronald E. Kagarise, head of the Spectro-
scopy Section, presented two papers at the an-
nual symposium on Molecular Structure and
Spectroscopy, held at the Ohio S’tate University,
Columbus, June 12-16.
Robert B. Fox, head of the Organic Syn-
thesis Section, presented a paper before the
symposium on Organic Nomenclature in Colum-
bus, Ohio, July 29-31, sponsored by the National
Academy of Science and the Air Force in con-
nection with a meeting of the IUPAC Commit-
tee on Organic Nomenclature.
A comprehensive group of nine lectures on
“Fracturing and Fracture Mechanics” is being
given by G. R. Irwin, superintendent of the
Mechanics Division, at the University of Illinois
during 1961. The first three lectures were given
in February. The second and third groups are
planned for presentation the first week of Oc-
tober and the second week of November.
G. R. Irwin, Mechanics Division, and J. E.
Sirawley, Metallurgy Division, attended the meet-
ing of the Deutscher Verband fur Materialpru-
fung, in Wurzburg, Germany, on March 16-17,
and presented a paper entitled “Progress in the
Development of Crack Toughness Tests.” They
were invited to attend as representatives of
AS'TM. This was the first large post-World War
II meeting of the organization. Nearly 600 mem-
bers and guests of DVM attended, largely from
West Germany, but also from 14 European
countries. The theme of the meeting was “Frac-
ture Phenomena and Fracture Testing for Struc-
tural Materials.”
J. A. Krafft, Mechanics Division, will attend
a conference on “Crack Propagation” at Cran-
field, England, September 26-28. His paper for
this conference is entitled “Effect of Dimensions
on Fast Instability of Notched Sheets” by J. M.
Krafft, A. M. Sullivan, and R. W. Boyle. Dr.
Krafft’s travel plans include visits to various
laboratories in France, Germany, Belgium, and
England.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Harold H. Shepard, chief of the Agricultural
Chemicals Staff, Agricultural Stabilization and
Conservation Service, served from March 3 to
April 28 as research specialist on pesticides at
the U. S. pavilion, International Agricultural Ex-
hibition, Cairo Egypt. In connection with this
assignment, Dr. Shepard traveled some 2000
miles in Egypt to view agricultural practices and
consult with Egyptian specialists, many of whom
have received doctorates at universities in the
United States.
On July 27, Justus C. Ward gave a talk before
the Great Plains Agricultural Council at Boze-
man, Mont., on “Problems in the Use of Chem-
icals.” On August 3, he visited the Wildlife Re-
search Laboratory, U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service,
Denver, to learn about the pesticide-wildlife
hazard evaluation project which is just getting
started.
Hazel K. Stiebeling, director of the Institute
of Home Economics, received the degrees of Doc-
tor of Humane Letters from Bowling Green State
University, on June 4, Doctor of Science from
Carnegie Institute of Technology on June 13,
and Doctor of Science from Drexel Institute of
Technology on June 17.
Elbert L. Little, Jr., dendrologist. Forest
Service, did field work in Alaska during May and
June. He studied the variations and distribution
of trees and collected specimens.
George W. Irving, Jr., Agricultural Research
Service, spent the week of August 14 at Woods
Hole, Mass., as a participant in the NAS-NRC-
sponsored conference on Renewable Natural Re-
sources. This meeting was part of a broad pro-
gram to accumulate the information needed to
respond to President Kennedy’s request for a
comprehensive study on research needed to make
optimum use of resources in the decades ahead.
100
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Dr. Irving’s topic was “Substitution Crops.” He
discussed the use of agricultural resources for
non-food, non-feed uses — an aspect of resource
use that is often overshadowed by the better-
known uses for agricultural products in foods
and feeds.
Dorothy Nickerson, color technologist in the
Cotton Division, Agricultural Marketing Service,
received the Godlove Award of the Inter-Society
Color Council on April 11, in recognition of her
outstanding contributions to the knowledge of
color in science, art, and industry. Miss Nicker-
son is the third person to receive the award.
The award is a plastic prism in which a gold
diffraction grating is embedded.
UNCLASSIFIED
Jerome Namias, chief of the Extended Fore-
cast Section, Weather Bureau, accepted an in-
vitation from the National University of Mexico
to serve as a visiting professor at the Institute
of Geophysics for two months this summer. He
lectured on “Climatic Fluctuations Associated
with Problems of Extended and Long-Range
Weather Forecasting.”
DEATHS
Harry A. Bright died at his home in Chevy
! Chase, Md., on May 22. He retired last year as
chief of the Analytical Chemistry Section of the
National Bureau of Standards, after nearly 47
years of service. Mr. Bright was a native of Read-
ing, Pa. He received the bachelor’s degree from
Pennsylvania State College in 1912 and the mas-
ter’s degree from George Washington University
in 1927. He joined the National Bureau of
Standards in 1913, and was made chief of the
j Analyical Chemistry Section in 1936. He was
I regarded as one of the Nation’s foremost author-
ities on the chemical analysis of metals and
alloys, and was awarded a silver medal by the
Department of Commerce in 1954 for meritorious
service. He also received the American Society
for Testing Materials award of merit and the
Anachem Award of the Association of Analytical
Chemists.
Gotthold Steiner, formerly in charge of nem-
atology research in the U. S. Department of
Agriculture, died August 21 at the age of 75.
I He was a native of Switzerland and was educated
there, becoming an American citizen in 1927. Mr.
Steiner joined the Department of Agriculture in
1921 and retired in 1956. Since retirement he had
been living in Puerto Rico, where he was engaged
I in research at the University of Puerto Rico on
tropical nematodes.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
We have tried to include not only the events
scheduled for October, but also such news items
as have accumulated since the May issue of the
Journal. Most affiliated societies will be resuming
regular meetings this month, after a summer of
reduced activity.
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
May 9 — Special meeting for presentation by
the authors of papers submitted in the annual
competition for awards and certificates.
May 16 — Ladies night, the final meeting of the
year, featured a talk by Miriam Ottenberg of the
Evening Star on "Investigative Reporting.”
September 11 — Special meeting on “Space
Communications,” with a panel under Edward
W. Allen, FCC, as moderator, consisting of the
following: John Pierce, Bell Telephone Labora-
tories; Elmer W. Engstrom, RCA; Herbert Trot-
ter, Jr. General Telephone and Electronics Lab-
atories; and Richard P. Gifford, General Electric.
American Society for Metals, Washington
Chapter
October 9 — A non-technical meeting, the an-
nual “Quench and Draw” party.
American Society of Civil Engineers, Na-
tional Capital Section
April 25 — Luncheon meeting, at which Bruce
G. Davis discussed the role of the Bureau of
Reclamation in development of the nation’s water
resources, the origin of the Bureau, its operation,
and current problems.
May 9 — Election of officers, and a report by
George H. Hickox on a program for increasing
emphasis on civil engineering and the work of
the Joint Board. Presentation of annual student
chapter awards to Donald Evick, GWU; Robert
Meyer, Catholic U., and Karl Lewis, Howard U.
May 23 — Final luncheon meeting of the year,
at which Col. John U. Allen and members of his
staff presented an up-to-date summary of the
progress and results of the comprehensive Corps
of Engineers study of the Potomac Basin.
June 3— Tour of the Southwest Redevelopment
Area, conducted by the chief engineer, James E.
Linde, including town houses, police and fire
stations, apartments, and new market center.
September 12 — -First dinner meeting of the new
season. Capt. Deane E. Carberry, Bureau of
Yards and Docks, spoke on “Castles in Spain,”
the significance today of the eight-year military
construction program in Spain.
September 26 — Maj. Gen. A. M. Minton de-
scribed the emphasis placed by the Air Force on
the professional status of its civil engineers.
October 10 — Regular dinner meeting, Cosmos
Club.
October, 1961
101
October 24 — Monthly luncheon meeting,
YWCA.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
April 27 — Discussions by Henry E. Frankel on
“Down to Earth Space Problems,” and by Law-
rence M. Kushner on “Imperfections and Mechan-
ical Properties of Single Crystals.”
May 11 — Chester M. S'innett, director of
product engineering, RCA, spoke on “Creativity
in Management.”
May 25 — Harry George, Martin Company,
spoke on “Manufacturing Planning,” the relation-
ship of this planning to engineering and product
design.
June 1 — Symposium on “Fuel Trends and
Economic Patterns,” covering resources, methods
of exploitation, uses and economies, in four
areas: coal, Myles E. Robinson, National Coal
Association; oil, C. W. Lutz, Gulf Oil Corpora-
tion; gas, Curtiss Morris, American Gas Associa-
tion; nuclear, Andrew W. Kramer, Atomics Mag-
azine.
September 28 — John de S. Coutinho, Poly-
technic Institute of Brooklyn, spoke on “Reli-
ability Control — Fact or Fiction,” a consideration
of the problem in aero-space equipment.
Botanical Society of Washington
The Society had no formal meetings, but initi-
ated for the first time in a number of years several
field trips, one to the Great Falls area, one to
Battle Creek Swamp and one to a hemlock pre-
serve area south of Scientists Cliffs.
October 3 — First regular meeting of the year.
Chemical Society of Washington
October 12 — Three concurrent speakers at 5
p.m., before dinner: “Organo-Derivatives of the
Transition Metals,” by F. G. A. Stone, Harvard
University; “Equilbrium Polymerization and
Copolymerization,” by Arthur V. Tobolsky,
Princeton University; “Non-Covalent Bonds in
Protein Structure,” by Irving M. Klotz, North-
western University. Following cocktails and
dinner, the speaker of the evening will be Glenn
T. Seaborg, chairman of the Atomic Energy Com-
mission, on “The Newest Synthetic Elements,”
at 8:15 p.m. Catholic University Chemistry
Building.
November 9 — Panel discussion on “The Chem-
ical Origin of Life” by Philip H. Abelson, Geo-
physical Laboratory, and Sidney W. Fox, Oceano-
graphic Institute, Florida State University. Walter
Reed, 8:15 p.m. Annual election of officers.
Columbia Historical Society
October 19 — Regular monthly meeting, at
Providence Hospital, where Philip Caulfield, chief
of staff, will speak on “A Century of History at
Providence.”
Entomological Society of Washington
June 7 — In cooperation with the Insecticide
Society of Washington, the group held a “Space
Age” picnic at Log Lodge, Agricultural Research
Center, Beltsville.
October 5 — Regular meeting, Room 43, Natural
History Museum. David C. M. Manson will speak
on “Some New Zealand Insects.”
Geological Society of Washington
April 26 — The 823rd meeting heard papers by
K. J. Murata and D. H. Richter on “Basaltic
Differentiation as Shown in Recent Kilauea
Eruptions”; Irving Friedman on “Trends in
Water and Deuterium Content of Pumices from
the 1959 Kilauea Eruptions”; and D. Foster
Hewett on “Distribution of Manganese.”
September 27 — At the first meeting of the new
season, Isidore Zietz and Kenneth G. Books
spoke on “Remanent Magnetism and Aeromag-
netic Interpretation of the Bearpaw Mts. Area,
Montana”; Paul M. Johnston on “Geology of the
Greater Washington Area”; and Bruce R. Doe
on “Geothermometry of the Sulfide Ores at Bal-
mat, New York.”
Helminthological Society of Washington
May 20 — Annual picnic for members, family,
and friends.
October 20 — 51st anniversary meeting, Officers’
Club, Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Dinner
at 7 :00 p.m., after which Leon Rosen, NIH, will
speak on "Eosinophilic Meningitis in the Pacific
Area,” and George Wharton, Ohio State, on
“Why Study Systematics?” Reservations are
limited to 125 persons.
Insecticide Society of Washington
May 17 — “Tropical Fruit Fly Population
Sterilization Research in Mexico, Hawaii and the
Western Pacific,” L. D. Christenson, ARS; and
“Comments on Possibilities of Applying the
Sterile Male Principle to the Control of Other
Insects,” by E. F. Knipling, ARS. Annual election
of officers, and social hour.
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
With a membership of 3,500 and some 20 pro-
fessional groups active, the Section has one ol
the more comprehensive programs in the Wash-
ington area. Beginning with the September issue,
there is a new and enlarged publication known
as The Washington Bulletin, under the editorship
of George C. Ruehl. This seems to be one more
step in the gradually increasing number of society
and chapter journals put out by affiliated
societies.
September 11 — General section meeting, featur-
ing a panel discussion of “Space Communica-
tions,” under Edward W. Allen, FCC, details of
which are noted in the announcements of the
American Institute of Electrical Engineers, above.
102
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
September 12, 14, 25 — Technical meetings.
September 27 — Gala reception and cocktail
party, main ballroom, Presidential Arms.
October 16 — Regular meeting under the spon-
sorship of the Professional Group on Engineering
Management, concerned with “Stock Analysis.”
The following technical meetings will be held
in October:
October 2 — Instrumentation.
October 4 — Electronic Computers.
October 10 — Microwave Theory and Tech-
niques.
October 17 — Antennas and Propagation; Radio
Frequency Interference.
October 18 — Nuclear Science.
October 23 — Engineering Management.
October 25-26 — Conference on Reliability and
Quality Control, Department of Interior Audi-
torium.
October 26-28 — Annual technical meeting of
the Professional Group on Electron Devices,
Sheraton Park Hotel.
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
May 22 — The Society, in joint sponsorship
with the Metropolitan Washington Board of
Trade, presented a testimonial luncheon under
| the “Health-USA” Awards program to James A.
Shannon, director of NIH, and William B. Walsh,
I founder and president of Project “HOPE.” This
activity was initiated in 1958 and has become an
outstanding recognition of individuals “who have
contributed in a statesmanlike fashion to the
health needs of our country.”
Philosophical Society of Washington
October 13 — 1512th meeting. S’ir Harold Jeff-
reys will speak on “The Strength of the Earth,”
at the Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
Society for Experimental Biology and Medi-
cine, District of Columbia Section
October 5 — First meeting of the season, Gor-
man Auditorium, Georgetown University Medical
Center, 38th St. and Reservoir Rd.
Society of American Bacteriologists, Wash-
ington Branch
October 24 — Regular meeting, including two
papers: “Ecology of Rocky Mountain Spotted
Fever: Recent Studies,” by F. Marilyn Bozeman,
Walter Reed Institute of Research; and “Nitrate
Reducing Streptococci,” by P. P. Williams and C.
W. Langston, USDA.
Society of American Foresters, Washington
Section
October 19 — First meeting of the fall season,
I YWCA building.
October, 1961
< I 7
THE RROWNSTONE TOWER
For scientific and
social purposes Amer-
ican scientific organi-
zations have evolved
along two lines: (1)
groups covering na-
tural science as a
whole (represented
by the American As-
sociation for the Ad-
vancement of Science
and national, state,
and municipal acade-
mies of science) ; and
(2) groups concerned with various subdivisions
of natural science (represented by national,
regional, or local scientific societies) . Among the
latter are the professional societies, the so-called
trade unions of science.
The Washington Academy of Sciences is one
of more than 50 state and municipal academies
that tries to devise and carry on programs
peculiarly suited to its area. These programs
differ greatly in different academies, depending
not only on local needs but on various historical
and human factors. On the whole our state and
municipal academies encourage rather than carry
on or support research, put much effort into the
improvement of scientific education and the
identification and development of science talent,
provide outlets for the publication of scientific
research, and furnish opportunity for scientists
in different fields to meet and discuss inter-
disciplinary problems. Through the activities of
their substantive sections they may provide the
equivalent of regional or local scientific societies.
Since the officers and board of the Washington
Academy are eager to improve its services in
kind, quality, and quantity, it should be helpful
to us to know what other academies are doing
and how they do it. In the April issue of the
Journal we reported on the California Academy
of Sciences. Now I should like to give you the
results of my visit of February 3, 1961, to the
New York Academy of Sciences at its head-
quarters, 2 East 63rd St., New York City. For
brevity I shall call it “the Academy.”
The Academy occupies what was once an
elegant four-story town house, which it has out-
grown. Upon entering the reception hall my
attention was attracted by large plastic numerals
over a door. They told the visitor that the mem-
bership of the Academy as of that day was
15,222. I next noticed a framed architect’s draw-
ing, hanging in a conspicuous place, of a modern
25-story office building. This was captioned “Pro-
posed Science Center Building for the New York
Academy of Sciences,” which would have its own
new nine-story auditorium building attached to
the Center Building. Later I was given a descrip-
103
tive pamphlet on this building project. It is
intended, of course, that offices in the larger
building will be rented by scientific or science-
related organizations and that income from rents
will help to pay for the cost of this ambitious
project. The site has not yet been purchased,
but it is desired to locate the Center within
walking distance of the Rockefeller Institute
and the New York Hospital — Cornell University
Medical School.
The Executive Director of the Academy, Mrs.
Eunice Thomas Miner, was not free to see me, so
I talked to a young man who was employed in
the distribution of the Academy’s publications.
I wanted to know whether the Academy should
be regarded as a municipal academy or a state
academy. “Neither,” he said, “the Academy is a
national organization that happens to be located
in New York City.” Its 1959 Constitution states
that “the center of its activities shall be in the
City of New York,” implying that there are no
geographical limits to its jurisdiction. This is true
in practice because more than 75 per cent of
the members reside in the 49 states outside of
New York and in 66 foreign countries.
Although the Academy is known nationally
and internationally for its publication of the
proceedings of scientific conferences that it
sponsors, it also has a local program of meetings
in its own building — monthly meetings of local
members of its four sections and 10 divisions.
Some of the papers presented at these meetings
are published in a monthly periodical called
“Transactions of the New York Academy of
Sciences.” The conference proceedings, or sym-
posia, are published separately as paper-covered
monographs, but for purposes of citation are part
of a periodical called “Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences,” the paging running con-
secutively through a “volume” of several mono-
graphs. There are also a few books called “Special
Publications” and a long series of reports begin-
ning in 1919 on the Academy’s “Scientific Survey
of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands.”
It is obvious that the Academy is primarily
an organization for publishing and distributing
scientific papers presented at symposia, which
it arranges and supports at a nearby hotel, pend-
ing the building of its own meeting facilities. It
might just as well be the New York office of the
American Association for the Advancement of
Science specializing in the production and dis-
tribution of symposium monographs. No other
organization in the United States, not even the
AAAS itself, competes with the Academy in its
special field of publication.
The ability of the Academy to recruit mem-
bers at $25 per person per year and hold them
resides in its capacity to give each member the
current monographs he wants. If the member is
medically oriented, he can easily want several
monographs per year, the total list price of
which would exceed $25. And, in addition, the
member receives the monthly program and the
Transactions. If the member does not get his
money’s worth, it is his own fault.
The biological and medical sciences predomi-
nate in the Academy. Of the 21 monographs
scheduled for publication in 1961 all but three
of four are in the life sciences. This predomi-
nance is reflected in the specialties of the mem-
bers. For example, I find the following distribu-
tion among the members elected in December
1959: M.D.’s 34; other medical scientists 20;
other biologists 5; chemists, usually organic, 12;
one physicist and a “pedagogue”; total 73. Thus
at least 80 per cent of these new members were
on the biological side and most of them were
either M.D.’s or were working in the medical
sciences.
Regarding qualifications for membership, “Per-
sons of scientific training, having been at any
time engaged in scientific work or otherwise in
the advancement of science, shall be eligible for
Active Membership when nominated in writing
to the Scientific Council by two members [hav-
ing] full membership privileges.” Recruiting of
new members is done systematically by mail.
Like the AAAS, the Academy elevates its
genuine scientists to fellowship to which a mem-
ber is eligible after having been an active mem-
ber for one year and having “attained outstand-
ing recognition for scientific achievement or for
the promotion of science.” A Fellow of the
Academy is also an Active Member and pays the
same dues as an active member. Other classes
of membership are: “student,” $5 annually; “sus-
taining,” $50 annually; “life,” $300; “patron,”
$1000; “benefactor,” $5,000. In addition there
are corporation members and honorary life
members.
The income of the Academy for fiscal year
1959 was almost $900,000. About $339,000 came
from dues and $354,000 from sale of publi-
cations. Contributions amounted to about $172,-
000. Most of this money, about $480,000, was
spent for production and distribution of publi-
cations. Approximately $22,500 was spent for
“membership expansion,” requiring more than
900 new members to be obtained in 1959 to make
the expenditure pay off!
The Academy is governed by a Board of
Trustees concerned with finances, budget, and
audits, and by a Scientific Council under which
operate the following committees: Executive, Con-
ference Organization, Educational Advisory,
Fellows and Honorary Life Members, Nominat-
ing, Publications and Awards, and Section Activ-
ities.
The Academy is structured as follows (two
divisions have recently been added) :
Section of Biological and Medical Sciences
Division of Anthropology
Division of Instrumentation
104
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Division of Microbiology
Division of Psychology
Section of Chemical Sciences
Division of Biochemistry
Section of Geological Sciences
Division of Oceanography and Meteorology
Section of Physical Sciences
Division of Engineering
Division of Nuclear Physics
As I have not attended a local meeting of any
of these sections and divisions, I am not able
to comment on their programs and connections
with science in the metropolitan area. Also I am
not informed about the activities of the Educa-
tional Advisory Committee, which is expected “to
advise and assist accredited educational groups,
upon request, on academic problems pertaining
to science education, especially at the secondary
school level.”
What a tremendous difference there is between
the New York Academy and the California
Academy; the former primarily a medium of
communication for medical scientists; the latter
primarily an educator of the public in natural
history and astronomy through popular publica-
tions and exhibits, backed by first-class research.
Neither academy bears much resemblence to the
Washington Academy; but both teach us not to
be exclusive and to do more for our members
and the lay public than we are now doing.
— Frank L. Campbell
ACADEMY ACTIVITIES
MAY BOARD MEETING
The Board of Managers held its 538th meeting
on May 2 at the National Academy of Sciences,
with President Abelson presiding. The minutes
of the 537th meeting were approved as previously
circulated.
Dr. Abelson announced that Joseph M. Cald-
well had replaced Douglas E. Parsons as delegate
of the American Society of Civil Engineers. He
also announced that Raymond J. Seeger was re-
signing as chairman of the Committee on Science
Education, since he expected to spend the next
year in advanced studies at Oxford University
under an NSF fellowship.
Dr. Frenkiel reported on the Meeting Com-
mittee’s recent experience in stimulating interest
in, and attendance at, the Academy’s lecture
meetings. He stated that the Committee plans to
continue the “third Thursday” regular meetings,
generally with speakers from the metropolitan
area, and that these would normally be given in
the John Wesley Powell Auditorium. The sugges-
tions considered for these meetings were reviews
and discussions of fields and disciplines which
are currently showing interaction, and perhaps
those in which interaction should be generated.
A second type of meeting, characterized by the
special meeting recently held at Carnegie Audi-
torium and addressed by Herman Kahn, Marquis
W. Childs, and Frank T. McClure, may be set
additionally for once a month; it is anticipated
that such meetings would require a larger audi-
torium than the Powell Auditorium. He said that
the Committee had not intended to sort out the
meetings by subject matter, to differentiate which
would be regular or special meetings. Dr. Frenkiel
then discussed the program for the May 18 regu-
lar meeting, and ideas for subsequent meetings.
For the Membership Committee, Dr. Robbins
presented the names of three nominees for First
Reading.
Dr. Robbins also announced the names of
Membership Committee Panel chairmen, as fol-
lows: Agricultural Sciences, Erwin L. LeClerg
(USDA) ; Chemistry, Howard W. Bond (NCI) ;
Earth Sciences, Victor T. S’tringfield (Geological
Survey) ; General Biology, Harold E. Finley
(Howard U) ; Mathematical Sciences, F. Joachin
Weyl (ONR) ; Medical Sciences, Ross C. Mac-
Cardle (NIH) ; and Physics and Astronomy, Rich-
ard K. Cook (NBS). She hoped that a panel on
engineering sciences could be completed before
the fall session.
Dr. Campbell reported that the Policy and
Planning Committee had endorsed a letter that
the Membership Committee proposed to send to
delegates from affiliated societies, concerning stim-
ulation of membership in the Academy (see also
under New Business, below) . Secondly, he re-
ferred to recent Committee discussions concerning
the need for another joint directory of the Acad-
emy and affiliated societies. Dr. Abelson indi-
cated that at a dinner meeting held some time
ago by the Policy and Planning Committee, rep-
resentatives of the affiliated societies expressed a
reasonably positive interest in having a joint di-
rectory; but that the major problem was to find
someone who was willing and able to take charge
of preparing the directory. There was consider-
able discussion of possible candidates for the job,
but no definite conclusions were reached.
Under New Business, the Board considered
some draft material distributed by Dr. Robbins
for the Membership Committee. This comprised
a proposed letter to the delegates of affiliated
societies, urging their cooperation in nominating
eligible scientists for membership in the Acad-
emy; a statement of procedures used by Member-
ship Committee Panels in considering new mem-
bers for election; and an extract from the Bylaws
concerning membership. (Essentially the same
material is included elsewhere in this issue of
the Journal, in the story entitled, “Academy
Membership Increase Urged.’’) After consider-
able discussion of the distinction between scien-
tific attainment and original research, the Com-
mittee’s report was unanimously approved.
Dr. Seeger, who had come in late, reported for
the Committee on Science Education. He indi-
0CTOBER, 1961
105
cated that the Meyer Foundation had withdrawn
its financial support of The Reporter, monthly
publication of the Joint Board. On the happier
side, he reported that NSF had provided a
$27,000 grant for extension of the projects that
have been caried on for the past two years. He
indicated, however, that because of a reduction
in the amount from what had been requested, and
because of changes brought about by the projects
themselves, the time had come to shift the course
and objectives of the program. He discussed the
shifts in emphasis in some detail.
Following the second reading of their names,
the following persons were elected to membership
in the Academy: James B. Edson, Roland E.
Florin, Harry A. Fowells, Robert E. Hardenburg,
Fred R. Kotter, Jacob Mazur, Eugene M. Rankin,
Robert L. Schoeneman, Paul A. Siple, and Mary
E. Warga.
JUNE BOARD MEETING
The Board of Managers held its 539th meet-
ing on June 6 at the National Academy of
Sciences, with Secretary Specht presiding in the
absence of both the president and the president-
elect. The minutes of the 538th meeting were
approved as previously circulated.
Dr. S’pecht announced that President Abelson
had appointed John K. Taylor to head the Com-
mittee on Science Education in view of the res-
ignation of Raymond J. Seeger. Also, Dr.
Seeger’s place as a member of the Committee has
been taken by Churchill Eisenhart, and Robert E.
Hobbs has been reappointed; the terms of Drs.
Eisenhart and Hobbs will extend through June,
1964. For the Meetings Committee, Dr. Frenkiel
spoke briefly regarding the successful meetings of
the current season, and pointed out that much of
the successful outcome depends upon very active
publicity efforts, particularly the mailing of
notices to the membership of other societies es-
pecially interested in the field. Responding to a
comment on conflicts between some of the meet-
ing dates and other society programs, he pointed
out that some of the most interesting speakers are
busy people whose schedules permit little re-
arrangement, and some of the meeting dates had
to be accommodated to their commitments.
Dr. Frenkiel also discussed program possibili-
ties for the fall meetings of the Academy; one of
these may be a follow-up of the recent panel dis-
cussion on science fairs. In consequence of the
ensuing discussion, Dr. Frenkiel moved that for-
mal action be taken to appoint a committee whose
responsibility would be the improvement of the
conduct of science fairs in the Washington area;
the motion was approved.
For the Membership Committee, Dr. Robbins
presented the names of eight nominees for First
Reading. Dr. Robbins pointed out that these
nominees would not ordinarily become elected
until the October meeting, and suggested that,
since the interval between first and second read-
ings is permitted to be only one week, the Board
should consider the election of the nominees a
week hence (i.e., in the absence of dissident
votes received within the following week, the
nominees would be considered elected). On mo-
tion of Dr. Frenkiel, the Board directed the sec-
retary to cast a unanimous vote for the election
of these nominees, subsequent to the determina-
tion of tacit approval.
Alfred E. Brown, the Board of Managers’ liai-
son with the Board of Trade of Metropolitan
Washington, addressed the Board by invitation on
the organization of the Board of Trade’s Science
Bureau. Among its future activities, the Bureau
expects to prepare a brochure listing the science
resources of the Washington area. Also, it will
undertake a comprehensive study of educational
resources in this area, particularly in graduate
science education.
For the Policy and Planning Committee, Dr.
Campbell reported that the Committee had rec-
ommended appointment of an ad hoc committee
to study the feasibility of preparing a joint di-
rectory of the Academy and affiliated societies. If
this committee recommends undertaking the task
and the Board approves, another committee would
bo appointed to do the job.
Dr. Campbell also reported that the Commit-
tee did not support an application for affiliation
from the National Capital Astronomers, a society
composed largely of amateurs, on the same basis
as that applied to local professional societies.
However, the Committee is not ready to make a
positive recommendation, which might involve
change in structure of the Academy and of its
categories of membership.
The Committee has been giving consideration
to subjects on which the Academy might take
a public position, through meetings or editorials
in the Journal — i.e., civil defense, administration
of the National Zoo, providing for science in the
National Cultural Center, the Cooper Bill to
police the use of laboratory animals, and scien-
tific intelligence.
In connection with activities of the Committee
on Science Education, Mr. Braaten noted that Dr.
Schubert had requested a donation of $200 to
support a summer research program for senior
high school students. It was pointed out that
NSF will match such funds by an equal amount.
Dr. Brombacher moved that the request be ap-
proved, with the suggestion that the AAAS be
asked whether its grant monies, normally credited
to the Academy for research support, could be
made available for this purpose. The motion
was approved.
For the Committee on Encouragement of
Science Talent, Dr. Brenner stated that the
Junior Academy of Science had issued 500 mem-
bership cards. Consideration is being given to
changing the nature of the Junior Academy's
spring banquet and awards ceremony, so that it
106
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
will not be run in competition with a regular lec-
ture meeting of the Senior Academy.
Dr. Foote led a discussion of the Academy’s
position as concerns support of the National Zoo.
Dr. Frenkiel suggested that the topic might be
discussed at a fall meeting of the Academy.
Following the second reading of their names,
the following persons were elected to member-
ship in the Academy: Abolghassem Ghaffari,
Jack C. Smith, and Thomas G. Ward.
Dr. Foote addressed the Board on the or-
ganization and functions of the Ohio and Vir-
ginia Academies of Science.
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
The original “Space Camera” was pre-
sented to the Smithsonian Institution by the
General Electric Company on February 28.
This is the first camera to take motion pictures
of the earth from an altitude of more than 300
miles. It was installed in a small data capsule
in the nose cone of a U. S. Air Force Thor
rocket that was launched from Cape Canaveral,
Fla., on May 12, 1959. The rocket travelled 15,000
miles southeast over the Atlantic Missile Range
in 15 minutes. The capsule was ejected near the
predicted impact point and recovered from the
sea by a recovery ship. The camera had to be
structurally designed to protect the exposed film
during re-entry into the earth’s atmosphere,
deceleration, water impact, and flotation. A signifi-
cant result of this test flight was proof that
ordinary photographic emulsions can be used in
unshielded cameras at altitudes of 300 miles
without deterioration from radiation, even though
the Van Allen belt extends down to about 200
miles in the latitude where the test took place.
A revised text of the International Tem-
perature Scale of 1948 was adopted by the
11th General Conference on Weights and
Measures at the October 1960 meeting of the
General Conference. This temperature scale
was originally adopted in 1927. It defined 6 fixed
points and formulas establishing the relationship
between temperature and the indications instru-
ments calibrated by means of the fixed points.
The fixed points were the oxygen point
( — 182.97°C), the ice point (0.000° C), the steam
point (100.000° C), the sulfur point (444.6° C).
and the freezing points of silver (960.5° C) and
gold (1063° C). Because of new experimental
data the Scale was revised in 1948. The recent
revision was prepared by the National Bureau of
Standards in cooperation with other members of
the Advisory Committee on Thermometry. In
this revision the easily-reproduced triple point
of water (0.01° C) replaced the ice point as a
fixed point on the scale. Also, the name was
changed to International Practical Temperature
Scale.
A collection of birds that may include
forms new to science has been made in the
area a r o u n d the headwaters of the Rio
Seteganti and the high mountain Cerro Pirre
in Darien, Panama, near the Colombian
border. The expedition was conducted by Alex-
ander Wetmore, retired secretary of the Smith-
sonian Institution, under the auspices of the
Gorgas Memorial Laboratory of Panama City.
The party was flown in by helicopters and landed
on hard ground near the edge of swamps. The
area is a dense jungle that had been abandoned
by humans since the closing of a gold mine
there about 50 years ago. According to Dr.
Wetmore, bird life in that part of Darien re-
sembles the South American avifauna more than
the Central American.
New agricultural weather services will soon
be provided in eight broad areas of the United
States through a $758,000 appropriation to the
Weather Bureau. The new program will provide
frequent and timely agricultural forecasts by
means of a teletypewriter circuit covering each
area. Local radio and television stations, as well
as farm publications and newspapers, will be
connected to the forecast office by the network.
The forecasts will enable farmers to determine
the best times for planting, spraying, harvesting,
and other vital operations. Besides three daily
special agricultural weather forecasts and a daily
“Farm Weather Summary,” the teleprinter hookup
will also give rapid dissemination of fire-weather
forecasts and agricultural interpretations of the
5-day and 30-day weather outlooks, along with
other information of value to agricultural interests.
Progress toward agreement on the use of a
compromise system for transliterating Russian
(Cyrillic) characters into the Latin alphabet was
achieved at a meeting of representatives of scien-
tific and engineering societies, editors, publishers,
librarians, and Government agencies held here on
July 14. The meeting was called by AAAS at the
request of NSF, to discuss the adoption of a
single, uniform transliteration system for Rus-
sian to English. The compromise system, tenta-
tively designated the “AAAS transliteration sys-
tem,” combines features of various systems now
in use so that transliteration of Cyrillic to Latin
alphabets may be standardized. An important
consideration in adoption of the compromise sys-
tem was that it could be typewritten with the
minimum use of diacritical marks. Systems con-
sidered in effecting the compromise were the
Board of Geographic Names (BGN) System, the
British Standards Institution (BSI) System, the
Library of Congress-American Library Associa-
tion (LC-ALA) System, and the International
Standardization Organization (ISO) System.
The Library of Congress has initiated a survey
of the scientific and technical serial publications
of the world. Purpose of the survey, under the
direction of C. M. Gottschalk, is the compilation
of a bibliography of sources on scientific and
October, 1961
107
technical serials and, based on those sources, a
calculation of the number of current periodicals
of the world by country and by subject. At the
conclusion of the survey, financed by an NSF
grant, a report will be published, along with an
international bibliography of sources consulted.
The first known underwater analyses of the
sea’s naturally-occurring radioactive sources have
been made by the Navy with a new ultra-sensitive
radiation measuring device recently tested a mile
deep under the Caribbean Sea. Called DUNC
(Deep Underwater Nuclear Counting) the device
is so sensitive that it can detect one atom of
radium in a billion billion molecules of water.
It was designed by the Nuclear Physics Division
of the Naval Ordnance Laboratory, to collect de-
tailed data on the presence and intensity of under-
sea radiation sources in their natural habitat.
Especially adapted for shipboard operation,
DUNC instantaneously renders data formerly ob-
tainable only by collecting samples of the sea
and subjecting them to analysis in a laboratory.
A gamma irradiation facility will be designed
for radiation research studies on the University
of Maryland campus. The heart of the new
project will be a cylinder, one foot high and
three inches in diameter, which will contain 3,000
curies of cobalt 60. Gamma radiation from this
source will be equivalent to about seven pounds
of radium. Targets to be irradiated will be placed
in a shielded room located below ground level.
The source will then be lowered into the room
to expose the targets. Upon withdrawal of the
source into its 5,000 pound lead shield, the
targets will be removed and analyzed.
On June 14, Commerce Secretary Luther H.
Hodges broke ground for the new National Bu-
reau of Standards laboratories at Gaithersburg,
Md. The ceremony signaled the initial construc-
tion phase for a 20-building, $104 million research
facility which will permit complete relocation of
the Bureau from its present location on Connecti-
cut Avenue to the 555-acre site in Montgomery
County.
108
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
Philosophical Society of Washington
Anthropological Society of Washington
Biological Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
Entomological Society of Washington
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Columbia Historical Society
Botanical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Washington Society of Engineers
American Institute of Electrical Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Helminthological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
American Society for Metals
International Association for Dental Research
Institute of the Aerospace Sciences
American Meteorological Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Acoustical Society of America
American Nuclear Society
Lawson M. McKenzie
Regina Flannery Herzfeld
Herbert Friedmann
John L. Torgesen
William E. Bickley
Alexander Wetmore
Margaret D. Foster
Frederick 0. Coe
U. S. Grant, III
Harold T. Cook
G. Flippo Gravatt
Howard S. Rappleye
William A. Geyger
William G. Allen
Doys A. Shorb
Mary Louise Robbins
Robert D. Huntoon
Joseph M. Caldwell
Kathryn Knowlton
John A. Bennett
Gerhard Brauer
Francois N. Frenkiel
Jack Thompson
Milton S. Schechter
Richard K. Cook
Urner Liddel
Volume 51 OCTOBER 1961 No. 6
CONTENTS
Page
Some Symbiotic Relations Between Saproglyphid Mites
and Solitary Vespid Wasps 39
Academy Membership Increase Urged 93
What Is the Best Value? 95
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 98
Affiliated Societies 191
The Brownstone Tower 103
Academy Activities 105
Science and Development 107
Washington Academy of Sciences 2nd Class Postage
1530— P St., N.W. Paid at
Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
library of Arnold
A-ifeQR£TUM
22 DIVINITY A V £ j
CAMBRIDGE 26 MASS »AS
—
c
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
Vol. 51 • No. 7
NOVEMBER 1961
M i »\\
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Moddie D. Taylor, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
OFFICERS OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
President: Philip H. Abelson, Geophysical Laboratory
President-Elect: Benjamin D. Van Evera, George Washington University
Secretary: Heinz Specht, National Institutes of Health
Treasurer: Norman F. Braaten, Coast and Geodetic Survey
Chemicals to Sterilize Insects
Arthur W. Lindquist
Entomology Research Division , Agricultural Research Service , USD A
Since earliest recorded times, man has
sought to protect himself against insects
attacking his person, his crops, and his
livestock. He has tried flails, brush brooms,
swatters, nets, traps, and chemicals. Always
his intent was to destroy the pests quickly.
During the last 30 years, emphasis has been
placed on quick kill by means of insecti-
cides. The agriculturist, householder, and
layman have stressed the need for quick
knockdown and kill of insect pests. But
now a change in thinking has occurred
among entomologists and others regarding
the control of insects.
The newest idea is to interfere with the
reproduction potential of insects and thus
reduce their ability to develop in large and
damaging numbers. That an insect is
rendered sexually sterile does not mean
that it will die immediately. The pest will
live for a normal length of time but will
be incapable of reproduction. Individual
and area control will be possible, but re-
sults may be slower than with direct kill
by insecticides.
Gamma Irradiation
Control of screw-worms by gamma radi-
ation, which makes the males sterile, has
had wide publicity. This method consists
essentially of rearing and releasing sexually
sterile males in numbers greater than exist
in a natural population until control or
eradication of the natural population re-
sults. If adequate numbers of sterile in-
sects are released, their very preponderance
gives them an advantage in competing with
the normal males for the females existing
in the natural population. Reports of
laboratory and field investigations dealing
with the sterile-male method have been re-
corded by Bushland (1951-1953), Lind-
quist (1955), and Knipling (1955). These
reports constitute some of the most interest-
ing entomological reading of the past two
decades. Proof of the soundness of the
gamma-radiation sterile-male method was
provided by the eradication of the screw-
worm from the 170-square-mile Island of
Curacao (Baumhover 1955). The remark-
able feat of eliminating this pest from
Florida and the Southeastern States in 1958
is an outstanding achievement. In this pro-
gram 3-C4 billion reared, sterile flies were
released systematically over approximately
85,000 square miles for a 17-month period.
This entirely new method of insect control
has resulted in an annual saving to the
livestock industry estimated at about $20
million.
Chemosterilants
As an extension of the gamma-induced
sterility concept, research was initiated at
our Orlando, Fla., laboratory three years
ago to develop chemosterilants that would
induce insect sterility. Such a method pre-
sents an intriguing and exciting area for
research. What if certain of these chemi-
cals could be used instead of radiation for
sterilizing large numbers of insects? Their
use might turn out to be an important ad-
vance, particularly if the chemicals would
cost less or be more practical than gamma
radiation and produce a sterile but more
vigorous insect. But most importantly,
could insects within a natural population
somehow be exposed to such chemicals,
and sterility effects achieved, without the
necessity of rearing and releasing vast
numbers of treated insects? It seems clear
that a population in a closed or isolated
November, 1961
109
system could be greatly reduced or even
eliminated if a high enough percentage of
the native insects were systematically and
continuously exposed to a sterilizing
chemical.
A chemical sterilizing both males and
females would prevent reproduction among
those actually sterilized and thus inhibit
reproduction to the same extent as would
an insecticide that kills directly. If, for
example, 90 percent of the females con-
tacted the sterilant, reproduction would im-
mediately cease in those individuals. If
90 percent of the males also contacted the
sterilant, these would be available to com-
pete with nonsterile males in mating with
untreated females. There should be a pre-
ponderance of these sterilized males over
the remaining untreated 10 percent of the
population or newly emerged specimens.
These numerically superior sterile males
would thus reduce the population further
and provide a bonus effect over the con-
ventional method of direct kill by insecti-
cides. In this way, a chemosterilant should
provide a potential 99 percent control of
reproduction instead of the 90 percent ex-
pected from an insecticide. Knipling
(1959) has calculated the theoretical popu-
lation decline of insect and other animal
populations subjected to a treatment which
causes sterility versus one that produced
direct kill. It should be pointed out, how-
ever, that the sterility effects must not
significantly change sexual vigor or com-
petitiveness of the treated males. A type
of sterility which destroys sexual behavior
or other habits would have no advantage
over direct destruction of the organism.
Possibilities for Use of
Chemosterilants
Since some of the experimental steriliz-
ing chemicals are effective as residual
treatments on surfaces, it might be possible
to use them safely on farm buildings or
other places where insects rest or con-
gregate. Their application might be feasi-
ble on vegetation in or near swampy areas
where horse flies, deer flies, and biting
gnats breed or congregate.
A residual treatment of resting places
such as sheds, buildings, and tree holes
might provide control of disease-carrying
mosquitoes. The females exposed to the
treatment would lay infertile eggs and the
males exposed would render sterile some
of the females not so exposed, thus further
contributing to a population decline. Com-
plete elimination of a disease-carrying
species may not be necessary since it is
well known that malaria, for instance, can
be controlled by the residual treatment of
buildings where the anopheline vector rests.
This treatment destroys only a fraction of
the population, but is sufficient to break
the transmission cycle of the disease. How-
ever, a sterility-producing treatment would
be expected to be slower in preventing
vector transmission since the sterile insects
might still be capable of transmitting the
disease. However, if a sterilizing agent
could also be made to act directly on the
disease organism in the insect, control of
the disease might be produced more rap-
idly.
Chemosterilants might be used along
with a bait or lure. The attractant would
draw the insects to a central point and ex-
posure to the chemosterilant would be by
contact with the residue or by oral inges-
tion of treated food. Insecticides have
proved highly effective, for example, when
incorporated in a bait for fly control (Ga-
han et al. 1953). Substitution of a chemo-
sterilant for an insecticide might thus offer
a means of producing sterility in a high
percentage of the natural population of this
insect.
A potentially useful scheme might be to
combine an insecticide and a chemosterilant
(Lindquist 1961). A combination of both
types of chemical could be used in a bait,
as a residual treatment of vegetation or
buildings, or as a space spray in restricted
situations. This plan might at first seem
contradictory. What advantage can there
be in killing insects that have been made
110
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
sterile? However, it must be realized that
insecticide treatments seldom kill all the
insects coming in contact with the material.
Some individuals of any population have
a natural tolerance to insecticides. Further-
more, most insect populations have devel-
oped varying degrees of physiological re-
sistance to insecticides and some of the
insects escape death even though exposed.
The advantage of a combined chemosteri-
lant and insecticide treatment is that the
insecticide would kill the weaker forms and
make the resistant surviving females in-
capable of reproduction. Surviving males
would act as a further deterrent to popu-
lation increase by mating with newly
emerged or other nonsterile females that
have escaped treatment. The insecticide in
a combined treatment would provide some
immediate control, whereas the sterilant
would have a more complete and lasting
effect in reducing the insect population.
A combined treatment might be an ef-
fective way of preventing insect resistance
to insecticides. Of course, there is the pos-
sibility that insects might develop physio-
logical resistance to the chemosterilants.
Insecticide-induced resistance is a result of
selection of individuals more capable of
withstanding the effects of these materials,
or with an innate capacity to develop effec-
tive physiological systems to rapidly me-
tabolize insecticides and subsequently
transmit such characteristics to their
progeny. It does not seem likely that
chemosterilants would induce such physio-
logical resistance, since the factor of se-
lection of stronger individuals by killing
the weaker does not seem to apply. Fur-
thermore, chemosterilants act on the repro-
ductive system without mortality, which
would appear to eliminate the process of
selection. However, resistance to any
chemical cannot be ruled out. Behavioristic
resistance such as avoidance of the chem-
osterilant could perhaps develop in a man-
ner similar to that reported by Schmidt
and LaBrecque (1959), who found that
house flies avoided malathion-treated baits.
Recent Research
For several years, it has been known that
certain chemicals prevent ovarian develop-
ment and affect reproduction in Drosophila
(Goldsmith vt al. 1952) and in house flies
(Mitlin et al. 1957). It thus seemed plausi-
ble that safe chemicals could be found to
sterilize both male and female insects.
About three years ago a screening pro-
gram to find such chemicals was initiated
at our Orlando, Fla., laboratory. The house
fly was the principal test insect, although
two species of mosquitoes were also tested
with the materials showing some activity on
the house fly.
As was expected, screening of chemicals
to find those possessing sterilizing proper-
ties was time-consuming and laborious.
Chemicals that kill can be detected in a
day or two, but testing of chemosterilants
involves treating the insect, mating treated
and untreated specimens, and determining
hatchability of eggs. These steps take ap-
proximately 30 days for the evaluation of
only one chemical. To date, several hun-
dred such compounds have been given a
preliminary screening.
Amethopterin (LaBrecque 1960) was
one of the first chemicals showing promise.
A single feeding of 0.5 percent in sugar bait
prevented female house flies from oviposit-
ing but had no effect on the males.
In 1960, a few compounds were found
that seemed to have exceptional promise in
sterilizing both male and female house flies,
mosquitoes, and stable flies. LaBrecque
(1961) reported on three ethylenimine
compounds known as alkylating agents,
and which are commonly referred to as
radiomimetic compounds. The coined
common names of these materials, together
with their chemical names, are as follows:
Aphoxide (tris(l-aziridinyl) phosphine
oxide), aphomide (A,A'-ethylenebis[P.P-
bis-( 1-a z i r i d i n y 1) -/V-methylphosphinic
amide]), and apholate (2,2,4,4,6,6-hexa(l-
aziridinyl) -2,4,6-triphospha-l,3,5-triazine) .
These compounds, fed to adults at con-
centrations of 0.5 to 1.0 percent in the
November, 1961
111
food, caused sterility of both sexes. The
flies must feed on treated food within
three days after emergence in order to be-
come sterile. Females given treated food
and mated with normal males produced
only a few eggs, and these did not hatch.
Matings of treated males with normal fe-
males resulted in almost normal egg pro-
duction. but none of the eggs hatched. In
small-cage tests, treated flies competed
satisfactorily with normal flies. In large-
room tests, flies given untreated food pro-
duced 40,000 pupae, whereas flies given a
choice of treated and untreated food pro-
duced 13 to 121 pupae. These results are
highly encouraging and suggest that chem-
osterilants have a reasonable chance of pro-
viding practical control.
Recent research at Orlando showed that
both sexes of Aedes aegypti (Linn.) and
Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say were
sterilized by incorporating aphoxide or
apholate in the adult food or placing it in
the larval water medium. Aphoxide has
been especially promising as a residual
treatment of resting surfaces.
In tests with apholate on the stable fly
(Stomoxys calcitrans (Linn.)), it was
found that a 48-hour exposure to a residual
film applied on glass at a rate of 10 mg.
per square foot caused nearly 100 percent
reduction in hatch of eggs from treated
females mated to treated males. Of par-
ticular interest was the fact that apholate
was nearly as effective 12 weeks after
treatment as at one week, thus showing
long-lasting residual effect. Topical appli-
cations of aphoxide at a rate of 3.7 mg.
per fly was slightly more effective on males
than on females.
Effect of Chemosterilants on Vigor
Insects exposed to gamma radiation
usually are not as long-lived as unexposed
insects, and somatic damage tends to make
treated insects less vigorous and competi-
tive than the normal insects. Such a radia-
tion effect is a serious obstacle to the pos-
sible use of gamma-irradiated insects for
controlling certain mosquitoes, the boll
weevil, the gypsy moth, and no doubt other
species. Although the screw-worm does
not seem to be injured to any great extent
by radiation, there is reason to believe that
the efficiency of treated males released in
nature is reduced. Competitive and vigor-
ous seekers of native females are required
to achieve full effect of sterile insects in
control or eradication. If chemosterilants
can be developed which produce sterile
males that are stronger, longer-lived, and
more active seekers and thus more com-
petitive than those treated with radiation,
a great step forward would be taken in the
utilization of the sterile-male technique,
involving the rearing and release of sterile
insects.
Unpublished research by G. C. La-
Brecque, D. W. Meifert, and Carroll N.
Smith at Orlando with house flies in cages,
comparing radiation and the administra-
tion of apholate, indicates that the chemo-
sterilant is more efficient in producing com-
petitive males than gamma-ray treatment.
Some males were given 1 percent apholate
in the adult food for three days after
emergence. Others were exposed to 2500r
in the pupal stage and introduced into
cages at a ratio of four sterile males to one
normal male and one normal female (4:
1:1). The hatch of all eggs laid by females
was reduced 77 percent by irradiated males
and 82 percent by the chemosterilized
males. The theoretical reduction of viable
eggs by either method with this ratio is 80
percent. The actual 82 percent reduction of
hatch caused by the chemosterilized males
is very little less than the 83 percent theo-
retical reduction by use of five sterile males
to one each of normal males and females
(5:1:1). It appears therefore that the
chemosterilized males are much more effi-
cient. In a rearing and release experiment,
four chemosterilized males would in theory
be able to effect as much control (82 per-
cent) as five chemosterilized males (83 per-
cent)—ratios of 4:1:1 as compared with
5:1:1.
In other laboratory-mating tests at Or-
lando. it was shown that apholate-treated
112
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
male house flies at ratios of 3, 5, and 10
times the normal males and females re-
sulted in average reductions of viable eggs
of 97, 100, and 100 percent respectively.
These results are even more significant
than those given in the preceding para-
graph. The theoretical reductions of viable
eggs at these ratios are 75, 83, and 91 per-
cent respectively. Thus it appears that the
chemosterilization induces much greater
than normal efficacy. If these observations
are borne out in practical use, they could
have an enormous bearing on control
efforts.
It should be emphasized, however, that
these experiments measured only the viabil-
ity of eggs resulting from the mating of
sterile males with normal females. It is
possible that behavior patterns other than
mating efficiency could be affected by
either treatment. Under field conditions,
competitiveness and vigor may be different
from that in laboratory cages.
Preliminary competition tests in cages
with Aedes aegypti indicate that apholate-
treated males are considerably more effec-
tive, that is, cause greater reductions of
viable eggs and are longer-lived than irra-
diated males. The experiments indicated
that the chemically sterilized males were
more competitive with normal males in
mating with normal females.
Problems and Hazards
Experimental field work to determine
how to use these chemicals, and later prac-
tical use of chemosterilants by individuals
or control agencies, pose several problems.
One of the first needs is to determine
where, when, and how to apply these ma-
terials so as to take full advantage of their
properties. With nearly any insect species,
much detailed information needs to be
known about feeding, resting, mating,
emergence, and flight habits so as to apply
the chemosterilant correctly and at the
right time. For example, the preferred
resting places of mosquitoes in nature must
be known for residual treatment of those
areas. Most mosquitoes and numerous
other insects rest on vegetation near the
water or site from which they emerge, and
dosages must be adjusted to take care of
the length of time particular species rest
thereon. With the chemosterilants now be-
ing explored, the greatest efficiency will re-
sult if the insects ingest or contact the
chemical very soon after emergence.
The use of chemosterilants against the
natural population to achieve insect con-
trol or eradication has not reached the
practical state. There are many unanswered
problems that need investigation and reso-
lution. The problem of previously mated
insects migrating into the treated area may
nullify results in a small area. Will such
normal insects invade a treated area in
sufficient numbers to prevent adequate con-
trol? With some insects, community use of
chemosterilants on a wide basis may be
necessary. With others, migration may not
be of a magnitude sufficient to reduce con-
trol. Will a delay in obtaining control of
bloodsucking forms or plant feeders by the
use of chemosterilants alone be accepted by
the public? Can efficient ways be found of
minimizing destruction of crop pests dur-
ing the time required for sterile insects to
reduce the population? Such objections
might be overcome by using conventional
killing agents to reduce the population to
noneconomic levels and then relying on
chemosterilants for greater efficiency in
preventing population increase. Much field
experimentation with any given species of
insect will be required to answer the many
questions on the efficacy and practicability
of chemosterilants in controlling insects,
It is obvious, therefore, that detailed
information on biology and habits is an
important prerequisite for effective use of
these chemosterilants. More than ever be-
fore, entomologists need to work toward
a fuller knowledge of insect habits. An im-
mense amount of research is also required
to devise ways to test and use chemosteri-
lants so as to obtain practical control or
eradication results.
November, 1961
113
Another important factor may be the
effect of chemosterilants on beneficial in-
sects. such as efficient parasites and preda-
tors. If an effective compound is found for
use against a destructive species, and it also
destroys the native parasites and predators
because of the way it is used, methods must
be devised to apply the chemical so it will
not harm or. at least do minimum damage
to, the beneficial forms.
Both domestic and wild animals, fish,
birds, and other animal life, including
man, must be considered in studying the
use of chemosterilants. One hopeful sign
is that some of the candidate sterilants now
being investigated seem to have an almost
specific effectiveness against species or
groups of species. Perhaps materials spe-
cific against certain forms or groups can
be found or synthesized, and thus provide
a safeguard against sterilizing effects on
beneficial organisms. The opportunities
for developing chemosterilants specific in
action against insects, with little hazard
to higher animals, should be as good as
developing insecticides specific in action
against insects and nontoxic to higher
animals.
In summary, therefore, it appears that
the application of chemosterilants for in-
sect control has considerable promise.
These compounds might be used in lieu of
radiation to produce vigorous competitive
males for release; and they offer great
potentialities for use against the natural
population, thus obviating the necessity
for release of enormous numbers of sterile
specimens such as was done in the highly
successful eradication program of the
screw-worm in the Southeastern States.
The recent discovery that certain chem-
icals will sterilize both males and females
of house flies, mosquitoes, and stable flies
by contact or ingestion provides exciting
possibilities for research and control. Such
materials, provided they are safe to use,
offer greater possibilities than killing
agents. Combining insecticides and chem-
osterilants in one treatment may be a way
to obtain immediate and longer-lasting
control than with insecticides alone. The
insecticide will act quickly on the weaker
individuals, and the chemosterilant will
make surviving strong individuals incap-
able of reproduction. This method may be
an effective approach to combating insecti-
cide resistance. It does not appear likely
that resistance to chemosterilants will de-
velop as quickly as when insecticides are
used alone.
Literature Cited
Baumhover, A. H., A. J. Graham, B. A. Bitter,
D. E. Hopkins, W. D. New, F. H. Dudley, and
R. C. Bushland. 1955. Screw- worm control
through release of sterilized flies. Jour. Econ.
Ent. 48(4): 462-466.
Bushland. R. C., and D. E. Hopkins. 1951. Ex-
periments with screw-worm flies sterilized by
X-rays. Jour. Econ. Ent. 44(5): 725-731.
Bushland, R. C., and D. E. Hopkins. 1953. Ster-
ilization of screw-worm flies with X-rays and
gamma rays. Jour. Econ. Ent. 46(4): 648-656.
Gahan. J. B.. R. S'. Anders, H. Highlands, and
H. G. Wilson. 1953. Baits for the control of
resistant flies. Jour. Econ. Ent. 46(6): 965-
969.
Goldsmith, E. O., and I. Frank. 1952. Sterility
in the female fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster,
produced by the feeding of a folic acid an-
tagonist. Amer. Jour. Physiol. 171: 726-727.
Knipling, E. F. 1955. Possibilities of insect con-
trol or eradication through the use of sexually
sterile males Jour. Econ. Ent. 48(4): 459-
462.
Knipling, E. F. 1959. Sterile male method of
population control. Science 130(3380): 902-
904.
LaBrecque, G. C. 1961. Studies with three alky-
lating agents as house fly sterilants. Jour.
Econ. Ent. 54(4): 684-689.
LaBrecque. G. C.. P. H. Adcock, and Carroll N.
Smith. 1960. Tests with compounds affecting
house fly metabolism. Jour. Econ. Ent. 53(5):
802-805.
Lindquist, A. W. 1955. The use of gamma radi-
ation for control or eradication of the screwT-
worm. Jour. Econ. Ent. 48(4): 467-469.
Lindquist, A. W. 1961. New ways to control in-
sects. Pest Control 29(6): 9, 11-12, 14, 16,
18-19, 36, 38, 40.
Mitlin, Norman, B. A. Butt. T. J. Shortino. 1957.
Effect of mitotic poisons on house fly oviposi-
tion. Physiol. Zoo. 30(2) : 133-136.
Schmidt, C. H.. and G. C. LaBrecque. 1959.
Acceptability and toxicity of poisoned baits to
house flies resistant to organophosphorus in-
secticides. Jour. Econ. Ent. 52(2): 345-346.
114
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
WAS Elections Procedures
Heinz Specht
Secretary , Washington Academy of Sciences
Election of the officers of the Washing-
ton Academy of Sciences is carried out an-
nually according to time-encrusted pro-
cedures which have not been changed in
any major way for many years, certainly
not since 1937. It is probable, however,
that most members of the Academy have
only a hazy notion of how election actu-
ally occurs, and it may well be that even
some of the Academy officers will find
something of which they were not aware
in the following commentary on this pro-
cess.
In order to fully understand the implica-
tions of certain parts of the procedure, it
should be pointed out that the Board of
Managers of the Academy is defined in the
Bylaws as follows :
Article V — Board of Managers
Section 1. The activities of the Acad-
emy shall be guided by the Board of
Managers, consisting of the President,
the President-elect, one Delegate from
each of the affiliated societies, the Secre-
tary, the Treasurer, six elected Man-
agers-at-large, the Editor, the Managing
Editor, the Archivist, and the Custodian
of Publications. The elected officers of
the Academy shall hold like offices on
the Board of Managers.
Section 2. One Delegate shall be
selected by each affiliated society (see
Art. VIII, Sec. 3). He shall serve until
replaced by his society. Each Delegate
is expected to participate in the meetings
of the Board of Managers and vote on
behalf of his society.
Section 5. The Board shall have power
to fill vacancies in its own membership
until the next annual election. This does
not apply to the offices of President and
Treasurer (see Art. IV, Sec. 5), nor to
Delegates (see Art. V, Sec. 2).
It is apparent that the Academy, which
is composed of an elected membership
from whom six Managers-at-large are
elected, and a body of 26 affiliated societies,
each of which is privileged to send a Dele-
gate, is thus governed by a dual represen-
tation. It should be pointed out, also, that
the Academy membership is a dues-paying
one and also committed to the policies of
the Academy through a vote, while the
affiliates, as such, are privileged only in
the following manner:
Article VIII — Cooperation
Section 2 provided, it (the
Academy) shall not have power to incur
for, or in the name of, one or more of
these societies any expense or liability
not previously authorized by said society
or societies ....
The common bond between the affiliates
and the Academy is, of course, the common
membership; but it is apparent that those
affiliates with few Academy members on
their rosters have a proportionately greater
representation on the Board than those
with many Academy members.
To turn now to the matter of election
of officers, the following is the serial list of
admonitions and procedures prescribed in
the Bylaws:
Article IV — Officers
Section 11. No one shall be eligible to
hold elective office until one year after
election to membership.
November. 1961
115
Section 12. Prior to November 1 of
each year the Nominating Committee,
having been notified by the Secretary,
shall meet and nominate by preferential
ballot, in the manner prescribed by the
Board of Managers, one person for each
of the offices of President-elect, of Secre-
tary and of Treasurer, and four persons
for the two Managers-at-large whose
terms expire each year. It shall, at the
same time and in like manner, make
nominations to fill any vacancy in the
foregoing. Not later than November 15,
the Secretary shall forward to each
Academy member a printed notice of
these nominations, with a list of incum-
bents. Independent nominations may be
made in writing by any ten active mem-
bers. In order to be considered, such
nominations must be received by the
Secretary before December 1.
Section 13. Not later than December
15, the Secretary shall prepare and mail
ballots to members. Independent nomi-
nations shall be included on the ballot,
and the names of the nominees shall be
arranged in alphabetical order. When
more than two candidates are nominated
for the same office the voting shall be by
preferential ballot in the manner pre-
scribed by the Board of Managers. The
ballot shall contain also a notice to the
effect that votes not received by the
Secretary before the first Thursday of
January, and votes of members whose
dues are in arrears for one year, will not
be counted. The Committee of Tellers
shall count the votes and report the re-
sults at the annual meeting of the Acad-
emy.
Section 14. The newly elected officers
shall take office at the close of the annual
meeting, the President-elect of the pre-
vious year automatically becoming
President.
The reader will now have become aware
of the fact that not only is it highly desir-
able that Academy members, who are mem-
bers of affiliate societies, take an active
part in instructing the Delegate from each
such society with regard to his actions on
the Nominating Committee, but also that
every effort should be made to nominate
to Academy membership those eligible in
the affiliated societies in order to get to a
thoroughgoing representation and true re-
ciprocal benefits to both the Academy and
its affiliates.
New WAS— Affiliate
Directory Planned
Robert W. Krauss
University of Maryland
For some time, the Academy’s Board of
Managers has been aware of the desirabil-
ity of having a directory of scientists resi-
dent in the Washington area. In this con-
nection, a committee was recently ap-
pointed by President Abelson to investi-
gate the feasibility of preparing such a
register, which would include all members
of the Academy as well as members of its
affiliated societies.
The membership of the committee is as
follows:
Edmund M. Buras, Harris Research
Laboratories
Charlotte C. Campbell, Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research
116
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Lowell E. Campbell, Agricultural Re-
search Service
J. Reid Clement, Naval Research Lab-
oratory
Ashley B. Gurney, National Museum
Robert W. Krauss (chairman), Univer-
sity of Maryland
The committee is fortunate to have as its
consultants James I. Hambleton, Archibald
T. McPherson, Waldo L. Schmitt, and
Bourdon F. Scribner, all of whom have
had prior experience with the preparation
of directories.
In any venture such as this, success will
depend on the active support of the mem-
bers and officers of the affiliated societies.
Accordingly, the committee has written to
each affiliate, asking whether the society is
willing to have its membership included in
the directory, and whether the society is
willing to give financial support to the di-
rectory. It is to be hoped that the result of
this survey will be a vote of confidence in
the project.
The value of a cross-indexed directory
with current addresses, specialties, and
affiliations of the splendid assemblage of
scientists in the Washington area should
be obvious. Not only will this directory
serve the members well; but also it should
serve as an introduction for many Govern-
ment agencies and private corporations to
the strength and skills of the scientists of
the Washington area.
Board Recommends Dues Increase
An increase in dues from $6 to $10 for
resident members, and from $5 to $7.50 for
non-resident members of the Washington
Academy of Sciences, was advocated in a
report of the Policy and Planning Commit-
tee to the Board of Managers at the October
3 meeting of the latter. The Board voted
unanimously to recommend the increase to
the membership of the Academy, which
will be asked to vote on the question in
December.
The chairman of the Policy and Plan-
ning Committee, supported by the treas-
urer of the Academy, pointed out that ex-
penses for 1961 will exceed income, and
that the secretary and treasurer should
have clerical assistance in 1962. The in-
crease, if voted by the members, will stop
deficit spending, which occurred also in
1959 and 1960, and will provide for pay-
ment of some clerical help.
Joint Board Sponsors
Student Research
Leo Schubert
Chairman , Department of Chemistry ,
During the summers of 1960 and 1961
the Joint Board on Science Education and
cooperating groups conducted an interest-
ing experiment in science motivation and
experience for secondary school students.
This involved the placement of gifted
Program
A merican U niversity
students in scientific laboratories of the
Washington area, for an eight-week period
of training in research methods. The
students received no financial compensation
except for a contribution toward their ex-
penses for carfare and lunches.
November, 1961
117
The experiment had a modest beginning
with 15 students in 1960, when it was
financed wholly by local scientific societies.
It was expanded to 36 students in 1961,
and was financed largely from funds sup-
plied by the National Science Foundation,
with ancillary support by the local societies.
It is expected that the program will be con-
tinued in the summer of 1962, on an even
larger scale.
The writer served as director of the pro-
gram and chairman of the Research Par-
ticipation Committee of the Joint Board.
Other members of the Committee were
Louise Marshall (NIH), Keith Johnson
(Washington Public Schools). Ira Hansen
(GWU), John Leonard (NRL), Theodore
Litovitz (CU), and Stephan Schot (AU).
Assisting the Committee as ex-officio mem-
bers were the following science supervisors
of local school systems: Phoebe Knipling
(Arlington), Charles Davis (Fairfax), and
Edmund Burke (Montgomery). Other
science supervisors of the area were invited
to participate, but were unable to accept.
All those associated with the Committee
served without compensation.
The program was fortunate to secure the
services of Margaret H. Maury, science
teacher at Sid well Friends School. Mrs.
Maury acted as associate director of the
program; she assumed the important obli-
gation of visiting the laboratories at which
the students worked, and serving as liaison
between the students, their scientist-super-
visors, and the director.
In addition to $2,500 provided by NSF,
funds were contributed by the following:
Joint Board ($790), Washington Junior
Academy of Sciences ($500), Washington
Academy of Sciences ($300), Chemical
Society of Washington ($300), and the
Montgomery County Board of Education
($200).
The program was advertised at virtually
no cost. The mimeographed announcements
were distributed through normal channels
by the school systems themselves, without
any postage involved. There were 170
qualified applicants representing 63 schools
in the area. Invitations were sent to 38
students ; only two students responded
negatively. The distribution of the students
was as follows: Montgomery (9), Prince
Georges (9), Washington (8), Arlington
and Alexandria (3), Catholic (3), private
(2) ; two students were from outside the
area. In all, 24 schools were represented.
The program was centered at American
University. The University provided facili-
ties for a series of orientation lectures at
the beginning, and a series of meetings at
the end when the students reported in sem-
inar fashion what they had accomplished
during the summer. The secretarial and ad-
ministrative functions were housed at the
University.
The unique feature of the experiment
was that cooperation was obtained from
research organizations in the area. In this
way, the science education potential of the
local research organizations was utilized:
this area has more scientists per unit of
population than any other geographical
area in the country.
In the cooperating laboratories, the
students were able to engage in genuine
research under competent scientists. The
point of view was that they were appren-
tices, and that they had a great deal to
learn; no effort was made to treat them as
geniuses who had already mastered much
of science. It was deemed important to ex-
pose them to research and to productive
scientists so as to assist in motivating them
toward science as a way of life.
The cooperating laboratories were most
generous with their assistance; they offered
twice as many openings as there were
students to fill them. The laboratories and
the numbers of students they assumed
were: American University Chemistry De-
partment (4), U. S. Department of Agri-
culture. Beltsville (8). Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research (6), George Wash-
ington University Surgical Research Lab-
oratory (1), Resources Research, Inc. (1).
Goddard Space Flight Center (3), Melpar.
Inc. (3), National Bureau of Standards
(2), National Institutes of Health (7). and
118
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Georgetown University Observatory (1).
The personnel officers and research admin-
istrators in these laboratories rendered in-
dispensable assistance in explaining the
program to the scientists in advance, in
planning with the scientists for student as-
signments, and in facilitating visits by the
associate director of the program.
The students were expected to keep reg-
ular working hours, identical with those of
their supervisors. They were given $10
weekly for eight weeks to assist in paying
for carfare and lunches, so that this ex-
perience would not prove to be a financial
burden. They were expected to behave as
junior research assistants, and it was oblig-
atory upon them to keep a research record
book; this served later to provide material
for the concluding seminars. The range of
research subjects varied widely and re-
flected many of the research interests of the
cooperating laboratories. As the students’
skills and understandings increased, the
scientists enlarged their responsibilities;
toward the end of the program, many of the
students were able to work out ideas of
their own.
A serious preliminary effort has been
made to evaluate the success of the pro-
gram; an ultimate evaluation, of course.
will require years and can be established
only in terms of what happens to the
students. The personnel officers of the co-
operating laboratories were most helpful in
this evaluation. The students as well as the
scientists were requested to evaluate the
program in as objective a manner as possi-
ble. Without exception, all the students be-
lieved the program to be excellent. They
not only learned new skills, but also were
much impressed with the discipline of
science and the way in which knowledge
leads to more knowledge. Of the super-
visors, only three felt that their charges
were anything less than excellent; and even
these three scientists commended the pro-
gram. A common statement was that “the
boy is a real find” or that “the program was
stimulating.” The only negative criticism
was that the program was not sufficiently
large.
The papers relating to this program, in-
cluding all the evaluation material, are on
file in the writer’s office, and are available
for inspection. A very limited number of
copies of a report on the program also are
available. It might be noted that the writer
has suggested sponsorship of this program
to a national organization, so that com-
parable programs may be set up elsewhere.
WAS Holds Inter-academy
Education Conference
John K. Taylor
Chairman , Committee on Science Education
others’ programs, and to explore avenues of
cooperation. It was attended by 41 persons,
including two from the Maryland Academy
of Sciences, three from the Pennsylvania
Academy of Science, six from the Virginia
Academy of Science, four from the West
Virginia Academy of Science, and one
from the Ohio Academy of Science. The
grant provided travel expenses for out-of-
A regional inter-academy conference on
science education, sponsored by the Wash-
ington Academy of Sciences, was held on
September 30 at the Executive House. The
conference was part of a program con-
ducted under a grant from the National
Science Foundation.
The conference had the objective of in-
forming neighboring academies of each
November, 1961
119
town visitors, as well as the cost of a
luncheon and incidental expenses.
The morning session was devoted to re-
ports from the academies describing their
science education programs. The afternoon
discussion centered on ways to improve
individual programs.
In reporting the activities of the Mary-
land Academy of Sciences, Nigel O'C.
Wolff, executive director, pointed out that
it was not a professional organization, but
rather that membership was open to all per-
sons interested in science. The Academy
operates a museum and a planetarium, and
conducts an annual course in basic astron-
omy. It annually sponsors a series of popu-
lar science lectures that provide a source
of income to carry on the Academy’s pro-
grams.
A unique feature of its program is the
preparation and circulation of self-con-
tained exhibits on all phases of science to
state high schools. Last year 763 deliveries
were made to various schools. The Acad-
emy also sponsors the National Science
Talent Search in the State, and recognizes
state-winners in this program.
Eight full-time employees are involved
in these activities, for which there is an
annual budget of $70,000, exclusive of an
NSF grant.
John G. Barker of Radford College and
William W. Scott of VPI reported on Vir-
ginia Academy activities, largely concerned
with a Junior Academy comprising 100
local chapters, with a total membership of
about 3,000.
A series of regional science days are
held annually at five locations — the Uni-
versity of Virginia, William and Mary,
VPI, the University of Richmond, and Vir-
ginia State College. Student papers are pre-
sented at each, and the best are selected for
presentation at the annual meeting of the
State academy. A Junior Academy Bulletin
is also sponsored and published three times
a year.
The Academy is also interested in
teacher preparation, and has appointed a
Committee on Science Teaching to study
how the Academy may cooperate with
others interested in raising the standards
for teaching certificates in Virginia.
K. B. Hoover, secretary of the Pennsyl-
vania Academy of Science, reported on
their activities. He was assisted by Oren S.
Kaltreiter, teacher at Middletown High
School, and by Albert Eiss of the Pennsyl-
vania Department of Education. Their ac-
tivities are closely associated with the
junior academy program and with the Tal-
ent Search. The junior academy holds an
annual meeting at which the best papers
receive small monetary awards and also are
published in the proceedings of the senior
academy. The Pennsylvania Academy is
also cooperating with the State Department
of Education on matters concerned with
teaching standards.
A three-part program was described by
John C. Wright of the West Virginia
Academy of Science. One program is a
series of Saturday morning seminars for
high-school students. Their visiting scien-
tists program, now in its second year, has
enlisted 25 college teachers who will visit
some 100 high schools this year. An in-
teresting activity is concerned with a fac-
ulty exchange among 17 colleges. Each col-
lege sends one faculty member to teach
for one week at another institution. Room
and board for the visiting instructor are
furnished by the college. A National
Science Foundation grant provides travel
and administrative expenses and a small
honorarium.
The Ohio Academy of Science operates
an extensive visiting scientist program
which was described by W. A. Manuel, its
director. Currently, 160 scientists have
been enlisted to visit a high school for a
one-dav period. The scientist speaks to
classes and assemblies, and confers with
the high school faculty. Requests for such
visits have been received from 235 schools
throughout the State. An NSF grant makes
this program possible.
The Washington Academy program was
described in detail bv John K. Taylor, di-
rector of projects for the Joint Board on
120
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Science Education. This program, consist-
ing of a visiting scientist and engineer proj-
ect, conferences on science education,
sponsoring of experimental courses at ele-
mentary and secondary school level, spon-
soring science fairs, a teacher awards pro-
gram, and publication of The Reporter , is
well known to most Washington Academy
members.
Abner Brenner commented briefly on
the local junior academy program, and B.
D. VanEvera, president-elect of the Acad-
emy, described the program which pro-
vides research grants-in-aid to high school
students and teachers.
The afternoon session was devoted
largely to discussion of problems concerned
with the administration of the various pro-
grams. Insufficient funds was a major
handicap to the success of most activities.
Lack of permanent staff and turnover in
volunteer help is a weakening factor. This
could, of course, be obviated by regular
and sufficient income devoted to educa-
tional activities. The NSF grants to acad-
emies have been a real stimulus to improv-
ing local educational programs.
In closing, the conference voted unan-
imously that the Washington Academy re-
quest funds from the NSF to sponsor a
similar inter-academy conference during
1962.
THE BROWNSTONE TOWER
Anyone who has
held any office in
a scientific society,
either by election
or by appoint-
ment, is inclined
to feel that mem-
bers do not sup-
port it by their
dues as well as he
thinks they should.
This is under-
standable because the conscientious office
holder, who wants nothing for himself,
does want to be identified with a progres-
sive, effective organization. Feeling as he
does that he has given his allegiance to an
important, or potentially important so-
ciety, he finds it hard to understand why
many of its members seem so indifferent
to it, and so reluctant to increase dues
upon which the service of the society to its
members and to others depends.
So far as the Washington Academy of
Sciences is concerned, I think I do under-
stand the zeal of the office holder and the
indifference of the uncommitted members,
and can make allowances for both. Conse-
quently, in the following reflections on
dues to the Academy. I shall not write as
if my readers were obstinate delinquents,
but to those who for good reasons of their
own do not give the Academy a high
priority among their many interests. Dis-
passionately, I should like to argue for
the improvement of its priority to be man-
ifested later, I hope, by the approval of the
members who will vote on the dues in-
crease recently recommended by the Board
of Managers. (See story elsewhere in this
issue.)
The fact that the Academy has not had
an increase in dues during the period in
which the cost of living has doubled, is not
by itself a strong argument for such in-
crease. It is a powerful reason only if the
members want the Academy to play an im-
portant role in this metropolitan area. Do
they really want it, or are they interested
only in the prestige of membership? And
what prestige attaches to an organization
too poor to do anything of which its mem-
bers may be proud?
The members can, I think, be proud of
the Academy as it is now. but without
additional financial support I can foresee
only a decline in its effectiveness; cer-
tainly no improvement will be possible. At
present a few members are giving an ex-
cessive amount of time to the Academy,
and are encroaching upon the time of
their employers. It will become increas-
ingly difficult to find members who will
jeopardize their family life and official
November. 1961
121
employment for the Academy. The secre-
tary. treasurer, editor, and perhaps other
officers need competent help for which we
should be able to pay — not full-time help
necessarily, but enough to relieve them of
routine bookkeeping and correspondence.
The Academy also needs an executive
officer — someone who can supervise the
Academy’s office work and see that the
policies of the Academy are carried out.
The executive officer should be a member
of the Academy in retirement, who could
derive much satisfaction from such service
and who should receive an honorarium,
although he might wish to serve without
compensation. It is important to find some-
one who is able, willing, and free to think
about the Academy every day, not only as
an office manager but as one who can see
opportunities for the Academy to be of
service, and can suggest ways and means
to the officers. Our sister Academy of Mary-
land (practically of Baltimore) has had
such services from Thomson King for sev-
eral years. Surely we in Washington can
find an equally able and devoted executive
officer.
To please, we hope, the majority of the
members, the journal of the Academy has
ceased to be an outlet for the publication
of primary research, mostly descriptive. It
has taken the more difficult road requiring
the organized cooperation of contributors
and solicitation of manuscripts, and is be-
coming a journal of scientific news,
opinion, and exposition, all intended to re-
flect the scientific activities of this area.
It has a long, long way to go before its
coverage can be regarded as adequate, and
it is susceptible to improvement in quan-
tity, quality, and variety. Because the
Journal is intended to be of local interest,
it is probable that non-member subscrip-
tions (from libraries) and non-resident
membership will decline almost to zero be-
fore the Journal becomes important
enough in its new role to attract national
and international attention. That means
temporary loss of revenue. Increase in dues
will overcome this loss and, we hope, pro-
vide a margin for improvement of the
Journal.
If your altruism and pride tell you that
the Academy is worth supporting, there
are at least two actions you can take with-
out being appointed to a committee by
President Abelson: you can vote for the
recommended increase in dues when you
receive the ballot by mail in December,
and you can propose at least one person
for membership in the Academy.
— Frank L. Campbell
Achievement Award
Nominations Requested
The WAS Committee on Awards for
Scientific Achievement has announced that
nominations for the Academy’s annual
scientific achievement awards are currentlv
being solicited.
Each year the Academy gives awards for
outstanding achievement in five areas —
biological sciences, engineering sciences,
physical sciences, mathematics, and teach-
ing of science. Award winners are honored
at the Academy’s annual dinner meeting in
January.
All members of the Academy are invited
to submit nominations, which must be re-
ceived by the Committee on or before No-
vember 13 in order to receive considera-
tion. Nominations must be prepared in ac-
cordance with established procedures,
which can be learned from the general
chairman of the Committee or from any of
the panel chairmen, as listed below:
General chairman: Norman Bekkedahl.
NBS (EM 2-4040, Ext. 7070)
Biological sciences: Harold A. Rehder.
National Museum (NA 8-1810)
Engineering sciences: Freeman K. Hill.
APL (JU 9-7100)
Physical sciences: Malcolm C. Hender-
son, CU (LA 9-6000)
Mathematics: Harry Polachek, D. T.
Model Basin (EM 5-2600, Ext. 377)
Teaching of science: John K. Tavlor,
NBS (EM 2-4040, Ext. 7855)
122
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical com-
mittees, civic activities, and marriages, births, and
other family news. Formal contributors are as-
signed for the systematic collection of news at
institutions employing considerable numbers of
Academy members (see list on masthead) . How-
ever, for the bulk of the membership, we must
rely on individuals to send us news concerning
themselves and their friends. Contributions may
be addressed to Harold T. Cook , Associate Editor.
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Marketing Service, Room 2628 South Building,
Washington 25, D. C.
APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY
Ralph E. Gibson, APL director, addressed
the Second Research Reserve Seminar on Re-
search Planning and Management on September
2 at Princeton University. His talk was entitled,
“A Systems Approach to Research Management.”
Albert M. Stone was a member of an ad-
visory panel which evaluated the Summer In-
stitute for High School Teachers on September
8 and 9.
Membership Forms
Available
The Membership Committee is ap-
pealing to all WAS members to recom-
mend eligible colleagues for member-
ship in the Academy.
Criteria for membership are discussed
in the October Journal , page 93.
Nomination forms may be obtained
from the Committee chairman, Mary
Louise Robbins, in the Department of
Microbiology, GWU Medical School.
1339 H St., NW, Washington 5 (FE 3-
9000, Ext. 510 or 554) .
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
W. Gardiner Lynn, professor of biology and
head of Department, participated in the Third
International Symposium on Comparative En-
docrinology at Oiso, Japan, June 5 to 11. While
in Japan he visited the Universities of Tokyo and
the Marine Biological Laboratory of the Uni-
versity of Tokyo, at Misaki. En route, he visited
the University of Hawaii. He received a travel
grant from the National Institutes of Health.
Dr. Lynn attended the American Institute of
Biological Sciences meetings at Purdue University
in August. During the meetings he represented
the American Society of Zoologists at a meeting
of the governing board of A1BS, and attended a
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Ameri-
can Society of Zoologists.
William R. Osgood, professor of civil en-
gineering, attended a six-week Summer Institute
on the Properties of Engineering at Iowa Slate
University. The Institute is designed to provide
experience for improving instruction in engineer-
ing materials science, it was administered by
Iowa State University for the National Science
Foundation and the American Society for En-
gineering Education.
Frank A. Biberstein, professor of civil engi-
neering, atended the 64th Annual Meeting of the
American Society for Testing Materials, held in
Atlantic City, June 28-29, as a member of its
Committee on Manufactured Masonry Units and
as chairman of the Editorial Subcommittee. He
is also a member of the Council of the recently
organized Division of Materials Sciences of
ASTM.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
Elliott B. Roberts, assistant director for
research and development, was appointed chair-
man of the Committee on Geomagnetism and
Aeronomy at the PAIGH meeting in Buenos
Aires, Argentina, August 1-15.
Lansing G. Simmons, chief mathematician in
the Geodesy Division, has been appointed chair-
man of the AGU Committee for the Study of
the Metric System in the U.S., and also chair-
man of the Board of Civil S’ervice Examiners
for the Coast and Geodetic Survey.
Dean S. Carder submitted a paper, “Sub-
Pacific Structure as Inferred from Seismic Waves
Generated by Nuclear Explosions in the Central
Pacific,” which was presented at the Tenth
Pacific Science Congress in Honolulu.
November. 1961
123
HARRIS RESEARCH LABORATORIES
Alfred E. B rown presented a paper entitled
“Research Planning Around People” at the Mili-
tary Research and Development Conference at
Fort Belvoir on Septmeber 26. Dr. Brown has
been appointed chairman of the R & D Re-
search Management Round Table for the 1961-62
term.
Arnold M. Sooke has been appointed Sec-
tion Editor for Textiles for Chemical Abstracts.
This post was held for many years by Milton
Harris of this laboratory. Mr. Sookne was chair-
man of a session on “Chemical Finishing of
Cotton” at the Fall Meeting of the Fiber Society,
held at West Point, N.Y., on October 11-13.
NAS-NRC
Norwood B. Gove of the Nuclear Data
Project attended the nuclear physics section of
the International School of Physics, held by the
Italian Society of Physics during August at
Varenna, on Lake Como.
Katharine Wav attended the Rutherford Ju-
bilee International Conference in Manchester,
England, the first week in September.
Agda Artna and Margaret Waggoner are
new staff members on the Nuclear Data Project.
The latter will spend half time on the staff
of the University of Maryland, as associate pro-
fessor, during the school year.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
Chester W. Emmons, senior mycologist, left
on October 2 for Japan and Indonesia, to de-
liver a series of lectures and participate in col-
laborative research. Dr. Emmons will lecture on
erytococcsis to the Japanese Society for Medical
Mycology at Sendai, and then lecture in Osaka
and other cities. In Indonesia, he collaborated in
research on phymvcoses and other systemic
mycoses at the laboratory of Dr. Lie-Kin-Joe in
Djakarta.
NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
Dean B. Judd received the Gold Medal of
the Illuminating Engineering Society on Sep-
tember 25, for distinguished contributions “that
have conspicuously furthered the art, knowledge,
and profession of illuminating engineering.” The
medal was awarded during the opening session
of the IES National Technical Conference in
St. Louis. Selection of Dr. Judd, outstanding au-
thority on color, as IES medalist for 1961, is
symbolic of the importance of color in illuminat-
ing engineering. As United States representa-
tive on the colorimetry committee of the Inter-
national Commission on Illumination (C1E) since
1931. Dr. Judd has won international esteem. He
has been chairman of CIE’s committee of experts
E-l.3.1 (Colorimetry) since its establishment in
1955.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America, Washington
Chapter
The new season opened on October 16 with
a talk by Aubrey W. Pryce, ONR, on “Current
Status of Underwater Acoustics.”
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
At the October 10 general meeting, C. W.
Schilling, director of the AIBS Biological Sci-
ences Communication Project, spoke on "Radia-
tion Hazards — Everybody’s Business.”
American Society of Civil Engineers, Na-
tional Capital Section
Neal Fitz Simons, research engineer with
OCDM, spoke at the October 10 dinner meeting
on “Design for Protection from Effects of Nu-
clear Weapons,” dealing with recent develop-
ments on the engineering and economic aspects
of shelter design.
A former Section member, Archie N. Carter,
now of Minneapolis, addressed the October 24
luncheon on the effect of major projects such
as the St. Lawrence seaway, the AEC program,
and the interstate Highway system on engineer-
ing and construction at the state and local levels.
The most recent Section bulletin devotes con-
siderable attention to a "Policies Plan for the
Year 2000,” just published by the National Capi-
tal Planning Commission and the Regional Plan-
ning Council. At that time, the population is ex-
pected to reach 5 million, and there is much
that needs to be done if we are not to have an
impossibly inefficient and unattractive urban
sprawl.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
A symposium on "Fuel Cell Potential for Oil
and Gas Power,” sponsored by the Oil and Gas
Power Division of the Section, was held October
12.
Botanical Society of Washington
At the 475th meeting, October 3, Russell B.
Stevens, George Washington University, addressed
his remarks to the question, “Is Plant Pathologv
a Fake?”
Chemical Society of W ashington
At the October 12 meeting at Catholic Uni-
versity, three concurrent before-dinner sessions
featured the following talks: “Some Aspects of
the Organic Chemistry of the Transition Metals,”
by F. G. A. Stone of Harvard University; "Equi-
librium Polymerization and Copolymerization,” by
A. V. Tobolsky of Princeton University; and
“Non-covalent Bonds in Protein Structure,” by
Irving M. Klotz of Northwestern University. Fol-
lowing a dinner attended by over 250 persons.
Glenn T. Seaborg, chairman of the Atomic Energy
Commission, spoke on "The Newest Synthetic
Elements.”
124
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Geological Society of Washington
Three speakers constituted the program on Oc-
tober 11, as follows: M. Gordon Wolman, Johns
Hopkins, “Downstream Effects of Dams on Al-
luvial Channels”; Charles Milton, USGS, “Prog-
ress in Green River Mineralogy’"; and Howard
T. Evans, USGS, “S'tudies on Hydrolysis Reactions
in Solution at the Royal Institute of Technology
at Stockholm, Sweden.”
Insecticide Society of Washington
A program on current large-scale insect con-
trol activities was presented on October 18. Four
talks were presented by US’DA scientists: “Cur-
rent Forest Pest Control Work,” by W. V. Bene-
dict, Forest Service; “Eradication of an Exotic
Tick,” by W. G. Bruce, Animal Disease Eradica-
tion Division ; “Research Designed toward the
Ultimate Eradication of the Boll Weevil,” by
C. F. Rainwater, Cotton Insects Research Branch;
and “Federal Control Programs Involving Gipsy
Moth, Pink Bollworm, Fire Ant, and Golden
Nematode,” by D. R. Shepherd, Plant Pest Con-
trol Division.
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
The general meeting of the Section on October
16 heard Thomas W. Folger, a senior security
analyst specializing in investments in the elec-
tronics industry, speak on “Electronics and In-
vestments.”
Some awareness of the scope and diversity
of the technical meetings within the section is
available from a calendar of meetings for October
in the new “Washington Bulletin." The list, omit-
ting speakers, reads as follows: “FM and PM
Interference Cancellation Techniques,” “Relative
Microwave Absorption Cross Section of Man-
kind,” “Problems in Making Spectrum Signa-
ture Measurements,” “Fabric Antennas and their
Application,” “Status of Controlled Thermonu-
clear Fusion Research,” “Techniques of Band-
width Compression for Telemetry,” and two con-
ferences— one an annual broadcasting symposium,
and the other on reliability requirements for
semiconductor device specifications.
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
The October bulletin of the Society, as usual,
schedules almost daily events of interest and im-
portance to medical specialists in the area. One
cannot but be impressed with the value of this
listing to those concerned with human health
problems.
Society for Experimental Biology and Medi-
cine, District of Columbia Section
Three papers, on diverse topics, appeared on the
October 5 program: “Lettuce Seeds, Aphids,
Cockle-burs, Petunias, and Rabbits — Photoperi-
odism and Growth,” by A. A. Piringer, US’DA;
“Preparation and Properties of n-Hydroxethyl
Derivatives of Adenosine, Adenosine Triphos-
phate, and Nicotinamide-adenine Dinucleotides
(DPN),” by H. G. Windmueller and Nathan O.
Kaplan, NIH; and “Chemistry of Inflammation,”
by John C. Houck, Children’s Hospital.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Events which will take place, so far as we can
determine at the time of writing, are noted
below. Where no indication of the program other
than date appears, it will in most instances be a
regularly scheduled meeting of the society. Last-
minute changes in time and place, or emergency
cancellations, cannot be reflected here.
November 7 — Botanical Society of Wash-
ington
Hugh D. Sisler, University of Maryland, will
speak on some effects of fungicides on cell me-
tabolism.
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
November 8 — Geological Society of Wash-
ington
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
November 9 — Chemical Society of Wash-
ington
Panel discussion on “The Chemical Origin of
Life,” by Philip H. Abelson, director of the Geo-
physical Laboratory, and Sidney W. Fox, Florida
State University. Annual election of officers.
Walter Reed Institute of Research, 8:15 p.m.
November 9 — American Society of Mechani-
cal Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 10th and E Sts., N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
November 10 — Philosophical Society of
Washington
Powell Auditorium, 8:15 p.m.
November 13 — American Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
Students’ night ; discussion of “Development
of High Strength Nickel Steel” by C. C. Clark,
International Nickel Co.
AAUW Bldg., 2401 Virginia Ave., N.W. Dinner
6:30; technical sessions, 8:00 p.m.
November 13 — Institute of Radio Engineers
Natural History Museum, 8:00 p.m.
November 13 — International Association for
Dental Research, Washington Section
“Thermal Expansion of Dental Materials —
Clinical Significance, Apparatus, and Results Ob-
tained with an Automatic Interferometer,"’ by
George Dickson, NBS; and “Dentistry Around
the World,” by Albert Russell, NIH.
Materials Testing Laboratory, NBS, 8:00 p.m.
November 14 — American Institute of Elec-
trical Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 10th and E Sts. N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
November 14 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
Rep. Robert F. Ellsworth (Kansas), will
November, 1961
125
speak on "An Engineer’s Role in Politics.”
Powell Auditorium. Dinner 6:00; program
8:00 p.m.
November 15 — Insecticide Society of Wash-
ington
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
November 15 — Washington Society of En-
gineers
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
November 16 Society of American For-
esters, Washington Section
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W. Dinner meet-
ing at 6:30 p.m.
November 20 — Acoustical Society of Ameri-
ca, Washington, D.C. Chapter
National Bureau of Standards, 8:00 p.m.
November 20 — Society of American Military
Engineers, Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W. Luncheon at
12:00 noon.
November 28 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
Maj. Gen. James B. Campert will speak on
"Civil Engineering in Missile and Space Pro-
grams.”
Luncheon meeting, YWCA, 17th and K Sts.,
N.W., 12:00 noon.
November 28 — Society of American Bacteri-
ologists, Washington Branch
C. W. Emmons, N1H, speaking on “Environ-
mental Sources of Mycotic Infections.”
Walter Reed Medical Center, 8:00 pm.
November 29 — Geological Society of Wash-
ington
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
JOINT BOARD
Howard A. Meyerhoff, executive director of the
Scientific Manpower Commission, is the newly-
installed chairman of the Joint Board on Science
Education. Serving with him are Robert B. Hobbs
of the National Bureau of Standards, vice-chair-
man; Ralph I. Cole of Melpar, Inc., secretary;
and Joseph E. Guidry of the Bureau of Reclama-
tion, treasurer.
The annual directory of the Joint Board is now
off the press, and is available for distribution to
science departments of local secondary schools
as well as to persons interested in science edu-
cation activities. It contains names and addresses
of school contact persons, personnel of various
Joint Board committees, and related information.
An appendix contains information on a number
of supporting activities.
Copies of this 32-page booklet are regularly
distributed to the heads of the science and math-
ematics departments of area schools by the school
contact persons. A limited number are available
to others on request to the Joint Board office, as
long as the supply lasts.
A summary report describing the activities
sponsored by the Joint Board under a grant from
the National Science Foundation, is now avail-
able for distribution. It contains a summary of
the Visiting Scientists and Engineers program,
accounts of the proceedings of the various con-
ferences held throughout the year, and reports
from the several schools cooperating in the ex-
perimental mathematics-science coordination proj-
ect.
Copies of this booklet will be sent free on
request to the Joint Board office at 1530 P St.,
N.W.
John K. Taylor, past chairman of the Joint
Board and editor of The Reporter, attended the
Shell Conference for Science Supervisors held at
Cornell University last August, to speak on
“Washington Scientists Assist Local Teachers.”
From the trend of the discussion following the
talk, it was evident that many were perhaps a
little envious of the fine cooperation existing here
between teachers and scientists.
The conference was attended by supervisors
from throughout the country. Others present from
the Washington area were Phoebe Knipling and
Mrs. Tempe Franklin of Arlington, and Charles
Davis of Fairfax.
JUNIOR ACADEMY
Specially-conducted trips to New York are be-
ing sponsored again this fall by the Washington
Junior Academy of Sciences. The schedule called
for trips to be taken on October 21 and 28, No-
vember 4 and 18, and December 9. Departures
from Washington are customarily at 8:05 a.m.,
with return at 10:15 p.m. of the same day.
The all-expense tours cost $16.50 per person.
This price includes round trip transportation in
reserved coaches; milk for lunch (students carry
lunch ) ; special subway train to the American
Museum of Natural History and the Hayden
Planetarium, as well as entrance fees to these
buildings; motor coach sightseeing tour of Newr
York City; and a complete hot dinner in a New
York restaurant. One teacher or chaperone is
provided for each 20 students.
The tours are restricted to members of the
Junior Academy, members of science clubs, and
their friends. Participants are limited to the
capacity of the trains.
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
A special seminar on transportation engi-
neering, sponsored by the International
Cooperation Administration, was held Au-
gust 17 and 18. Eight professors from the Uni-
versity of Belgrade attended the seminar, which
was organized by ICA to assist them in planning
the establishment of a school of transportation
126
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
in Yugoslavia. The visitors returned to the Uni-
versity for three weeks in September, and will
return again for two weeks in November.
The phenacridiniums, a new family of
quaternary ammonium compounds, were
very effective against downy mildew of lima
beans in laboratory and greenhouse test
conducted at Beltsville by B. C. Smale and
WAS member J. W. Mitchell. The compounds
were synthesized and studied for clinical use
against bacteria and fungi affecting man, but
have not been adopted for medical use because
of the indelible yellow stain they cause. However,
the stain caused at the concentrations used for
plant disease control is not objectionable. Further
research will be needed before these compounds
are recommended.
Maryland mineral deposits are shown on
a map recently released by the Geological Survey.
Locations of more than 500 mines, quarries, and
pits in which minerals of commercial value have
been found are shown. The map (Mineral In-
vestigations Map MR 12) was compiled from
published sources, field observations, and infor-
mation in the files of the Geological Survey.
A new world-wide network of earthquake
recording stations will improve detection of
earthquakes and monitoring of earth vibrations.
The network will span six continents and will be
instrumented by the Coast and Geodetic Survey.
The information gathered will provide data on
the nature, location, and frequency of world
earthquakes that might ultimately lead to pre-
diction of destructive shocks.
The cornerstone of the Smithsonian’s Mu-
seum of History and Technology was laid
Friday, May 19. Chief Justice Earl Warren,
chancellor of the Board of Regents of the Insti-
tution, and Senator Clinton P. Anderson, a regent
and chairman of the Joint Congressional Com-
mittee, presided at the ceremonies. The new mu-
seum will have five floors and a basement. Na-
tional collections relating to American history
(civil, political, and cultural) ; the history of
science, engineering, and manufacturing; and
the history of our Armed Forces will be exhibited
on three of the floors. The other floors will con-
tain study collections, laboratories, shops for pre-
paring exhibits, a cafeteria, and service facilities.
The building will be completed in the summer
of 1962.
A center for the collection and evaluation
of data on atomic transition probabilities
and cross sections has been established at the
National Bureau of Standards. It will compile
atomic data in areas where experimental or theo-
retical investigations are being conducted at NBS.
This is part of a research program sponsored by
the Office of Naval Research and the Advanced
Research Projects Agency, to supply data needed
for current and future research in plasma physics
and astrophysics.
Chemists at the Naval Ordnance Labora-
tory predict that lightweight fiberglass rocket
motor chambers, reinforced with non-woven
glass fibers (roving), are destined soon to
become standard equipment for space vehi-
cles. These chambers may cost only a fourth
as much, and be up to three times as strong on
a weight basis, as the metal chambers presently
in use. This prediction is based on results from
a new device, “NOL Hydraulic Ring Tensile
Tester,” developed under the NOL program to
evaluate parallel glass fiber as reinforcement for
plastic pressure vessels, of which rocket motor
chambers are a prime example. Test hoops are
fabricated by drawing glass strands through a
resin bath onto a circular mold under controlled
conditions of temperature, tension, and angle of
wind. Tests indicate that application of a chem-
ical finish to glass fibers is one of the important
factors in improving the tensile strength of a
glass reinforced plastic. Plastics reinforced in
this manner offer a means of controlling the direc-
tional strength of a structural item to a degree
not possible with woven or random mat fiberglass.
Also, parallel glass fibers theoretically can be
packed to occupy over 90 percent of the volume
in a reinforced plastic. This is important, since
the strength properties of a reinforced plastic are
directly proportional to the plastic glass content.
November, 1961
127
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
Philosophical Society of Washington
Anthropological Society of Washington
Biological Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
Entomological Society of Washington
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Columbia Historical Society
Botanical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Washington Society of Engineers
American Institute of Electrical Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Helminthological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
American Society for Metals
International Association for Dental Research
Institute of the Aerospace Sciences
American Meteorological Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Acoustical Society of America
American Nuclear Society
Lawson M. McKenzie
Regina Flannery Herzfeld
Herbert Friedmann
John L. Torgesen
William E. Bickley
Alexander Wetmore
Margaret D. Foster
Frederick 0. Coe
U. S. Grant, III
Harold T. Cook
G. Flippo Gravatt
Howard S. Rappleye
William A. Geyger
William G. Allen
Doys A. Shorb
Mary Louise Robbins
Robert D. Huntoon
Joseph M. Caldwell
Kathryn Knowlton
John A. Bennett
Gerhard Brauer
Francois N. Frenkiel
Jack Thompson
Milton S. Schechter
Richard K. Cook
Urner Liddel
Volume 51
NOVEMBER 1961
No. 7
CONTENTS
Chemicals to Sterilize Insects 109
WAS Elections Procedures 115
New WAS-Affiliate Directory Planned 116
Board Recommends Dues Increase 117
Joint Board Sponsors Student Research Program 117
WAS Holds Inter-academy Education Conference 119
The Browns tone Tower 121
Achievement Award Nominations Requested 122
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 123
Affiliated Societies , 124
Calendar of Events 125
Joint Board 126
Junior Academy 126
Science and Development 126
Washington Academy of Sciences 2nd Class Postage
1530— P St., N.W. ' Paid at
Washington, D. C. Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
2
JOURNAL
of the
WASHINGTON
ACADEMY
of
SCIENCES
Vol. 51 • No. 8
DECEMBER 1961
■ RECEIVED
J AN '2 1332
JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Editor: Samuel B. Detwiler, Jr., Department of Agriculture
Associate Editors
Frank L. Campbell, National Academy of Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
Sciences University
Harold T. Cook, Department of Agriculture John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards
Lawrence A. Wood, National Bureau of Standards
Staff Assistant
Richard P. Farrow, National Canners Association
Contributors
Albert M. Stone, Applied Physics Laboratory
John A. O’Brien, Jr., Catholic University
Elliott B. Roberts, Coast & Geodetic Survey
Margaret D. Foster, Geological Survey
Russell B. Stevens, George Washington
University
Moddie D. Taylor, Howard University
Frank L. Campbell, NAS-NRC
Alphonse F. Forziati, National Bureau of
Standards
Howard W. Bond, National Institutes of Health
Ileen E. Stewart, National Science Foundation
Allen L. Alexander, Naval Research Laboratory
Victor R. Boswell, USDA, Beltsville
Harold T. Cook, USDA, Washington
William J. Bailey, University of Maryland
This Journal, the official organ of the Washington Academy of Sciences, publishes
historical articles, critical reviews, and scholarly scientific articles; notices of meetings and
abstract proceedings of meetings of the Academy and its affiliated societies; and regional news
items, including personal news, of interest to the entire membership. The Journal appears
eight times a year in January to May and October to December.
Subscription rate: $7.50 per year (U.S.), $1.00 per copy. Foreign postage extra.
Subscription Orders or requests for back numbers or volumes of the Journal, or copies of the
Proceedings, should be sent to the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1530 P St., N.W., Washing-
ton, D.C. Remittances should be made payable to “Washington Academy of Sciences”.
Claims for missing numbers will not be allowed if received more than 60 days after date
of mailing plus time normally required for postal delivery and claim. No claims will be allowed
because of failure to notify the Academy of a change of address.
Changes of address should be sent promptly to the Academy Office, 1530 P St., N.W.,
Washington, D. C. Such notification should include both old and new addresses and postal zone
number, if any.
Advertising rates may be obtained from the Editor, care of Academy Office.
Second class postage paid at Washington, D. C.
OFFICERS OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
President: Philip H. Abelson, Geophysical Laboratory
President-Elect: Benjamin D. Van Evera, George Washington University
Secretary: Heinz Specht, National Institutes of Health
Treasurer: Norman F. Braaten, Coast and Geodetic Survey
Is Plant Pathology a Fake?
Russell B. Stevens
Professor of Botany , George W ashington University
Several years ago, at the very last ses-
sion of an elaborate Golden Jubilee cele-
bration of the American Phytopathological
Society, J. G. Horsfall spoke to the prob-
lem of plant pathology as an art and as
a science. There were only a few score of
us in attendance, but the argument was
well put and convincing — fortunately it
has since become available in print.* ** In
essence we were urged to recognize that
what we call plant pathology has two
aspects: (1) the art of disease diagnosis
and control; and (2) the science of dis-
ease investigation. It was even suggested
that there be different curricula and
separate advanced degrees for individuals
looking toward one or the other of these
areas of effort.
Certainly there is an art of plant pathol-
ogy. Our title might then have been more
precisely put, “Is the science of plant
pathology a fake?” or, less flamboyantly,
“It there a science of plant pathology?”
We shall address ourselves to this point
from here on.
By whatever standards one chooses to
apply, plant pathology has many dimen-
sions. The causal agents of disease run
from the inanimate to the animate; from
viruses to flowering plants. The crops
affected are horticultural and agronomic,
cultivated and uncultivated, commercial
and private, marketable and ornamental,
and are involved anywhere from seed-
ling to adult, from planting to consump-
tion. Host-parasite relations are specific
* Adapted from an address before the Botan-
ical Society of Washington, October 3, 1961.
** Horsfall, J. G. A Look to the Future — the
Status of Plant Pathology in Biology and Agri-
culture. In Holton, C. S., ed. Plant Pathology —
Problems and Progress 1908-1958. The Univer-
sity of Wisconsin Press, pp. 63-70 (1959).
and non-specific, local and systemic, in
the aggregate affecting all parts in all
ways. Most important, we plant pathol-
ogists are forced to the conclusion that
what we do is a synthetic or derivative
discipline; that is, we are involved with
genetics, with physiology, with taxonomy,
with soil science, with mycology, with
virology, with nematology, and so on.
The basic issue, then, is whether, when
we remove, so to speak, the contributions
of these supporting areas, there is any-
thing left. Is there anything which be-
longs to pathology alone? If it is properly
to be called a science, there must be
unique points of view, concepts, and
methods of attack. Does it have these?
Let me assume that there is something
left and examine the implications of the
position plant pathology occupies. I
think they might be stated as follows:
1. Pathology faces, in exaggerated form,
the dilemma of biology vis-a-vis mathe-
matics, physics, and chemistry. Just as the
biologist is unavoidably a less-than-profes-
sional mathematician, physicist, and chem-
ist, so the plant pathologist is destined to be
a second-rate geneticist, physiologist, micro-
biologist, and agronomist in pursuing his
pathology. Sheer time and labor limita-
tions make this inevitable; one cannot hope
to be wholly competent in the contributory
areas.
2. As a science compounded of others,
plant pathology’s unique problems and
points of view appear only belatedly to
oncoming scientists. Many promising
students are lost along the way to the
more clearly defined disciplines, and we
must, on the average, settle for less than
our share of the talent available when in
truth, perhaps, we need more.
3. The problems of special interest to
December, 1961
129
pathology have not usually the elegance
and precision so appealing to the research
man and fashionable today.
Two rather recent personal experiences
described below may illustrate the points
just enumerated.
We have just completed a ten-year sur-
vey of pertinent material in the USDA
library and have prepared a so-called
bibliography of reviews, including doc-
toral dissertations. In the more than 2,500
items turned up there was certainly no
dearth of reviews and theses in fields con-
tributory to pathology, but there were
very few in what I would call pathology,
per se. Yet our sample of this kind of
literature should, if anything, be biased
in favor of the broad point of view.
A committee, of which I am a member,
is now well along in preparing a “source-
book” of laboratory and field exercises
to be used in the introductory pathology
courses. We started out to solicit those
exercises already in use, stressing in our
appeal that we wanted exercises which
bore on what, for lack of a better term,
we had to call “principles” of plant pathol-
ogy. As I recall it, we got none whatso-
ever. True, there were plenty of exercises
in mycology, in one or another symptom
expression, in nematology, and so on, but
none that could not have appropriately be-
longed in a supporting discipline or in a
course on the art of pathology. It has ap-
parently not occurred to teachers of plant
pathology to teach the science of plant
pathology; they teach either the art of
pathology or the science of something else.
This is not the place to describe the
practice of plant pathology as an art or
to summarize the work of its supporting
disciplines. The work is generally of high
caliber, well staffed, and adequately sup-
ported, but hardly of first priority. My
special plea is for attention to that ill-de-
fined group of problems which have more
than once been dubbed unfashionable.
However. I do not plead for them because
of their unfashionable status — however
this might add to their charm — but be-
cause I am persuaded that they, and they
very nearly alone, constitute the science
of plant pathology. Unless we emphasize
them, our science is a fake.
It is embarrassingly difficult to cite ex-
amples of what I have in mind. Much
contemplation has brought to my attention
fewer than a dozen, though there must be
others. These are, briefly, and in no con-
scious order of importance:
1. Analysis of disease loss.
2. Social impact of disease.
3. The disease aspects of introducing
our domestic varieties into foreign areas.
4. The geographic origins of patho-
gens.
5. Inoculum potential and dynamics.
6. The logistics of vector activity.
7. Epidemic patterns.
8. Disease forecasting.
9. Instrumentation in pathology.
10. Biological warfare research (not on
the basis of its possible use in conflict,
but because valuable insights might be
obtained should we completely reverse
our traditional approach; e.g., by trying
to make disease worse experimentally, we
might discover unpredictable data on how
better to control it).
Some of these areas are hardly touched,
while others have received a bit more at-
tention, and 1 doubt that it would be ap-
propriate to detail the existing literature
on any one of them. But whether or not
this list is complete, whether or not it has
inaccuracies, these are, with no crucial
exceptions, programs which are peripheral
to plant pathology as it is now carried on.
They tend to be carried out by men al-
ready established in more orthodox fields,
or to be done as a sort of spare time ac-
tivity. And, incidentally, they receive more
attention in foreign countries, whatever
that may imply. We do not find graduate
students willing to risk specializing here,
and I think we must somehow remove the
barriers to vigorous prosecution of these,
to me, core items. True, some may re-
130
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
quire sophisticated methods — operations
research, systems analysis, mathematical
models, whatever these popular terms
mean. But first we must make a start on
improving the climate of opinion.
It will be difficult to find graduate stu-
dents willing to undertake this kind of re-
search, and even more difficult to arrange
interdepartmental programs for them,
once we have them ready to begin. Indi-
cations are that money for research grants
can be got only with great difficulty in
competition with the narrower fields. It
may be hard to find jobs for the products
of the graduate program once they are
ready. These make more difficult, but they
do not rule out, the successful accomplish-
ment of the objective.
My final answer, then, must be: There
is an art of plant pathology. The science
of plant pathology, as we now do it, is
largely a fake. But it need not be, if we
will stop concentrating on things that con-
tribute to plant pathology and start work-
ing on those things which are plant pathol-
ogy. The first job is to get rid of the un-
warranted procedural and psychological
barriers that get in our way.
Membership to Vote
On Officers, Dues Increase
Annual elections of Academy officers
for 1962 will be held in December, as
usual, by mail ballot. Not later than De-
cember 15, the secretary will send out, for
approval of the membership, the follow-
ing slate of candidates selected by the
Nominating Committee:
For president-elect: Heinz Specht of the
National Institutes of Health.
For secretary: George W. Irving, Jr., of
the Agricultural Research Service, USDA.
For treasurer: Malcolm C. Henderson
of Catholic University.
For manager-at-large, 1962-64 (two
to be elected): Bernice Eddy (NIH),
Kathryn Knowlton (NIH retired), Harold
H. Shepard (USDA), and Russell B.
Stevens (GWU).
For manager-at-large, 1962-63: Leo
Schubert (American University). Dr.
Schubert would replace Herbert Freid-
mann, who has left the Washington area.
To be valid, the ballots must be returned
to the secretary before the first Thursday
in January.
The new officers will take office at the
close of the annual meeting in January.
At the same time, Benjamin D. Van Evera,
current president-elect, will automatically
assume the presidency.
Previously-elected managers-at-1 a r g e
who will continue in office during 1962
are W. G. Brombacher and A. 0. Foster
(class of 1960-62), and A. F. Forziati
(class of 1961-63).
Delegates to the Board of Managers, in
accordance with the recently-revised by-
laws, will continue in office until new se-
lections are made by the respective affili-
ated societies.
Concurrently with the election of
officers, the membership will he asked
to approve an increase in annual dues
from $6 to $10 for resident members,
and from $5 to $7.50 for non-resident
members. This action was unanimously
endorsed by the Board of Managers at its
meeting of October 3. (See also President
Abelson’s message on the dues increase,
and the notes on the October Board meet-
ing, elsewhere in this issue.)
December, 1961
131
A Message from the President —
The Proposed Dues Increase
You have been asked to consider increas-
ing your dues to the Washington Academy
of Sciences. Your Board of Managers has
unanimously and emphatically recom-
mended that you vote to change dues of
resident members from $6 to $10 a year
and of non-resident members from $5 to
$7.50 a year. 1 want to tell you why I con-
cur with this recommendation and join in
asking you to vote for this increase.
Those who work for the Academy are
proud of it. It is the organization for the
advancement of science in the Washington
metropolitan area, a local counterpart of
the American Association for the Advance-
ment of Science. Being local, it stresses
service to the community, the advancement
of science being a by-product of its activi-
ties. It is the one organization in Washing-
ton that can act and speak for all the
scientists of this area. It has performed
much valuable services in many ways, par-
ticularly in relation to secondary educa-
tion. An outstanding recent example was
participation in a week-long Institute on
Isotopes and Radioactivity.
It had become obvious that this com-
munity needs to know more than it does
about radioactivity, its hazards and its
benefits. “Fallout” is an ominous word now
known to everybody. Scientifically, what
lies behind it? What does it really mean
and what can we do about it? The Academy
and its Joint Board of Science Education
decided to act through the secondary
schools of this area. With the cooperation
of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,
the school systems of the area, the Institute
of Nuclear Studies at Oak Ridge, Tenn.,
and other groups, a short course on radio-
activity and its effects was organized for
the science teachers of our secondary
schools. Conducted at the headquarters of
the Carnegie Institution, the course con-
sisted of morning talks by the best lectur-
ers obtainable, followed by afternoon
laboratory work using equipment for the
detection and estimation of radiation, in-
cluding more than 40 Geiger counters.
While these teachers were away from their
own classes, other scientists — members of
the Secondary Schools Contacts Commit-
tee or scientists procured by them — were
substituting in the schools.
The foregoing is only one example of the
public service that the Academy provides.
In addition, it offers frequent lectures on
various important scientific subjects, as
well as on important topics of more gen-
eral interest. Lectures are open to teachers,
students, and all others who are interested.
Here, scientists of different disciplines get
to know one another and to broaden their
outlook. The Academy provides stimula-
tion and guidance for its Junior Academy.
It seeks out and publicly recognizes the
younger professional scientists who are
making their mark in research or teaching.
It publishes this Journal , reflecting the
scientific life of this area and the subjects
discussed in meetings of the Academy and
of its affiliated societies. It will publish, we
hope, a joint directory of the members of
the Academy and its affiliated societies. On
controversial, science-connected questions,
the Academy can take a public position.
One could go on at length pointing out
the accomplishments and potentialities of
the Academy. Even greater accomplish-
ments can be attained if we get behind it
with more dollars, greater attendance at
meetings, more contributions to the Jour-
nal, and proposals of many more scientists
for membership. The Washington Academy
of Sciences can be a great organization.
Let’s make it so!
— Philip H. Abelson
132
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Radioisotopes Institute
Proves Big Success
A week-long institute, or special course,
on “Isotopes and Radioactivity,” designed
to acquaint secondary school science teach-
ers of the Washington area with the role
of radioactive isotopes in science and civil
defense, was held October 30-November
3 at the Carnegie Institution of Washing-
ton. It attracted much favorable attention
from the press, radio, and television, and
drew enthusiastic praise and thanks from
the participants.
Conceived by Philip H. Abelson, presi-
dent of the Washington Academy of
Sciences, the Institute was sponsored by
the Academy and the Joint Board on
Science Education. At the request of Dr.
Abelson, the morning lecture and after-
noon laboratory curriculum was organized
by Ralph T. Overman, chairman of the
Training Division of the Oak Ridge Insti-
tute of Nuclear Studies. About 140 teach-
ers from parochial, private, and public
schools were released from their class-
rooms to take this intensive course, one or
two from each school. Their classes were
met by scientists and engineers who had
volunteered through the Joint Board to
substitute for them.
The first meeting of the Institute, in the
auditorium of the Carnegie Institution,
was attended not only by the chosen teach-
ers but by many interested members of the
Academy. Dr. Abelson sounded the key-
note of the Institute. Discussing its ob-
jectives, he said,
“Atomic energy already has many im-
portant applications in scientific research
and technology, and these uses are certain
to expand greatly in scope and importance.
The increasing role of reactors in furnish-
ing energy for electric power competitive
with other fuels is a step toward the day
when almost all of civilization’s energy
needs will be met by atomic energy. Radio-
active isotopes are employed in virtually
every branch of experimental science and
the uses are increasing rapidly, especially
in chemistry and the medical and biological
sciences. Radioactive isotopes are especial-
ly useful in performing many simple but
instructive experiments which can be a
means of interesting students in science.
In view of these factors, the teaching of
additional information on radioactivity
would be desirable even if there were no
fallout problem.
“Attaining a maximum capability of liv-
ing with radioactivity is one of the most
important problems facing the nation to-
day. Unfortunately, the present level of
knowledge throughout the citizenry is ex-
tremely low. As a result, many millions of
lives could be needlessly lost in panic, and
many more from failure to deal properly
with fallout. Radioactivity is now inexor-
ably part of our lives, and we must know
enough to behave rationally in any cir-
cumstance. Even the briefest training could
save many lives, just as practice fire drills
have prevented many tragedies. If we
adults are responsible citizens, we will try
to give the young an enhanced chance of
survival.
“The practical mechanism for teaching
almost any subject is through the schools.
Eventually all students in the secondary
schools should receive instruction in the
fundamentals of radioactivity. Unfortunate-
ly, only a few high schools are capable of
giving such training. In part the deficiency
is in equipment, but principally the prob-
lem is lack of trained instructors. Under
normal circumstances, many years might
elapse before this latter deficiency would
be overcome. In view of the urgency of
the problem, unusual measures should be
taken. A desirable objective is that at
least one teacher in each high school of
December, 1961
133
134
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
the nation should be capable of giving in-
struction in radioactivity. The essential in-
formation could then be disseminated if
the knowledgeable instructor taught other
teachers and also the students. The Insti-
tute on Isotopes and Radioactivity will
largely fill this objective for the metro-
politan area of Washington. Thus, it could
be a useful model for other areas in the
country.”
Dr. Overman was the principal lecturer
of the Institute. One teacher of long ex-
perience was heard to call him a virtuoso.
He lectured first on nuclear reactions and
modes of radioactive decay, speaking with
extraordinary grace and clarity and using
a blackboard to illustrate the concepts in-
volved. A coffee break was followed by a
lecture by Paul C. Aebersold, director of
the Office of Isotopes Development, Atomic
Energy Commission, on uses of isotopes
in industry. Then came a short report by
Richard Banks of D.C.’s Stuart Junior High
School, on the use he had made of radio-
active tracers in his classes.
At the end of the morning session, the
guests departed and lunch provided by
the Carnegie Institution was served by a
caterer to the teachers and their instruct-
ors in an adjacent room. Each teacher
was given a schedule of assignments in the
laboratory, and thus knew the names of
his instructor and the three teachers with
whom he would work. There were six sec-
tions and instructors and six groups of
teacher-trainees in each section. Within
two minutes after the teachers entered the
laboratory, they were at their Geiger count-
ers, immersed in their afternoon’s measure-
ments.
The activities of the remaining four
UPPER — WAS President Abelson assists a
teacher participant in pipetting a 10-microliter
sample of Cl38 solution from an Erlenmeyer flash.
The sample, prepared in the University of Mary-
land reactor, will be dried and its half-life
determined in a Geiger counter.
LOWER — Five teachers participating in the
course examine the workings of a monitoring
apparatus used by OCD.
days were like those of the first. Every
morning Dr. Overman called for questions
on the previous day’s work. Then he lec-
tured on successive days on detection of
radiation, interaction of radiation with
matter, characterization of radiation, and
radiological safety. Each day a different
lecturer followed Dr. Overman.
Charles W. Shilling, M.D. (Capt. USN
ret.), recently deputy director of the Di-
vision of Biology and Medicine, Atomic
Energy Commission, and now director of
the Biological Sciences Communications
Project, American Institute of Biological
Sciences, gave a splendid example of oral
communication with visual aids when he
lectured on the biological and medical
uses of isotopes and biological effects of
radiation.
James L. Liverman, chief of the Biology
Branch of the above-mentioned Division of
the Atomic Energy Commission, talked on
the uses of isotopes in agriculture, citing
the eradication of the screw worm fly, a
serious pest of cattle, from the southeastern
United States by the release of millions of
artificially-reared flies sterilized by ex-
posure to radiations from an isotope of
cobalt.
W. Wayne Meinke, Department of
Chemistry of the University of Michigan,
lectured on uses of isotopes in chemistry.
Walmer E. Strope, director of research,
Office of Civil Defense, talked on “Radi-
ation and Civil Defense” and showed a
motion picture on the test occupancy of a
fallout shelter by several families with
children.
Laboratory instructors included Wilfred
Mann and S. B. Garfinkel of the National
Bureau of Standards; Richard Banks,
William J. Saunders, Keith Johnson,
Stephen Hopkins, and Archie Lucas of the
D.C. Public Schools; and Patrick L.
Parker of the Geophysical Laboratory,
Carnegie Institution. Health physicists
Abraham Schwebel and Thomas G. Hobbs
of the National Bureau of Standards also
took part in the laboratory work. The sub-
jects of laboratory work were Geiger
December, 1961
135
counter experiments, isodose plot with
ionization chamber, tracer experiments, de-
tection of fallout, and autoradiographic
localization of radioactivity.
The lecturers were impressed by the
alertness and attentiveness of the teachers,
and the laboratory instructors by their
efficient work. At the end of the week the
teachers were asked to evaluate their ex-
perience in the Institute. Some of their
comments follow :
“I was most impressed with the clearness of
the presentations. As a former science teacher of
25 years ago, I have felt that up-dating my gen-
eral information in terms of present day knowl-
edge could not have been packaged with any
greater density. I am most grateful to all indi-
viduals and organizations for being permitted to
be a party to this institute. In terms of today’s
living, I would say that no other area needs
greater training for effective adjustment to future
living.’’
“I’d like to express my very sincere gratitude
for the opportunities offered to me this week. I
found the lectures most informative, the lab
set-up complete and convenient, the instructors
patient and helpful, and the entire experience
most educational. By sharing the information I
have gained with my fellow teachers and stu-
dents, I feel that I can be helpful in urging
action toward safety preparations and promoting
some clear, basic concepts of radiation danger.
“The friendly spirit of all connected with the
Institute has certainly strengthened my faith in
our way of life. I shall remember all these good
people in my daily prayers.”
“I feel that this was a rare opportunity — I hope
that it will be repeated in many other areas in
the very near future. I feel that the value to
others not at this Institute will depend to a large
degree on the ease and ability to obtain sample
isotopes and equipment to use in passing on
this wonderful experience and knowledge.”
“This week has been very stimulating. It cer-
tainly gives me an opportunity to re-evaluate my
program at school and include some materials on
radioactivity. I feel more confident in the han-
dling of these materials now. It is my hope that
this kind of training will continue.”
“I was very grateful for the opportunity. Every-
thing was beyond my best expectations. You
have even motivated me to take the NSF course
in radiation chemistry that will be offered at
American University next fall.
“The first lecture by Dr. Overman on the
structure of the atom, etc., will be of great use
to me in teaching chemistry. I appreciate it most
of all.”
“I think this has been one of the most beneficial
experiences I have yet had from ‘teacher insti-
tutes.’ There was a good balance of lab expe-
rience with lecture presentation, both conducted
on a level high enough to challenge and stimulate
thought.
“My interest now is to find out even more in
this field.
“The main difficulty in the school will be to
find the time to set up the equipment and use
it. In general much of the material will be
wasted unless more time can be provided to pre-
sent this material.”
“I am very grateful for this opportunity, and
intend to incorporate much of what I’ve learned
into an adult education program which our com-
munity is launching.”
“This institute has been extremely valuable
and beneficial. It has served the purpose of
presenting information of current importance in
regard to isotopes and radioactivity which, in
turn, permits the teacher to have a better and
informative background for presentation to stu-
dents.”
“This week was highly informative to me. The
momentum of the work gave no lag in time — in
fact, time was too short to do the many things one
wished to do. I feel I received more from this
week’s work than many full semester courses I
have taken in advanced physics in universities.
At least this was better handled than in many
college courses.”
“More institutes on this and other topics would
be of tremendous help. Contact with professional
experts is invaluable.”
“The spirit of endeavor, the excellence of the
lecturers and administrative effort displayed in
the institute warrant the highest commendations.
I am happy to have been a participant in this
program.”
“I have greatly benefited from every part of this
Institute. There was a wealth of material gained,
explained, and appreciated. We are very grateful,
and have a great admiration for all you have
done for us. We will try to reach out with all
you have given us to those we can help.”
Dr. Abelson wishes it were possible to
name here all the participants in the Insti-
136
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
tute and all who helped to make it possible
directly or indirectly. The Geiger counter
equipment was provided by the Picker X-
Ray Corporation, Nuclear-Chicago Corpor-
ation, Baird-Atomic, Inc., and Tracerlab,
Inc. Civil Defense equipment was lent by
the D.C. and Olney Regional Offices of
OCD, and demonstrated by Cosmo J.
Liberti of the Olney Office. Irradiation
services were performed by the University
of Maryland reactor and the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory facilities. In addition,
samples of fallout materials were furnished
by Luther Lockhart of the Naval Research
Laboratory. An apparatus for collecting
fallout materials was lent by Frank B. Con-
Ion, of the Division of Radiological Health,
Public Health Service.
The logistics of the Institute were
handled by staff members of the Carnegie
Institution of Washington, including Philip
H. Abelson, A. David Singer, F. A. Rowe,
J. L. England, and E. J. Shipley of the Geo-
physical Laboratory ; and Ellen Flack,
Ailene Bauer, Joe Holdaway, and Leroy
Dabney of the Administration Office, as
well as Harold H. Young of the Atomic
Energy Commission.
A most important indirect part was
played by the Secondary Schools Contacts
Committee of the Joint Board on Science
Education. Walter H. McCartha is chair-
man of this committee and Grover C. Sher-
lin, vice-chairman. The members of the
committee are scientists and engineers, one
for each secondary school, who link science
and technology in their schools with pro-
fessional science and engineering outside.
They are organized into eight divisions;
i.e., two for the District of Columbia, two
for the surrounding counties in Maryland.
two for the surrounding counties in Vir-
ginia, one for the parochial schools, and
one for the private schools of the whole
area — a total of 217 schools. Each division
has its own chairman and vice-chairman.
This is the organization that provided,,
from the professional scientific and engi-
neering community, volunteer substitutes
for the teachers who attended the Insti-
tute.
One of the projects of the Joint Board
is the development and maintenance of a
list of scientists and engineers, with their
telephone numbers, who have expressed
willingness to help the secondary schools
in various ways. Copies of this list were
in the hands of the chairmen of the di-
visions of the committee and were used
by them for making the contacts necessary
to procure the needed substitutes. Because
very few volunteer substitutes could or
would undertake to serve for 5 days, it was
necessary to find up to ten or more substi-
tutes for each absent teacher. That meant
that several hundred substitutes had to
be obtained in one way or another. Some-
times contacts were made by the science
supervisors of the school systems and some-
times by administrators in agencies em-
ploying scientists or engineers. Some sub-
stitutes were professional teachers who
were paid by the schools; in other cases
professional substitutes attended the In-
stitute. All in all, there was a sort of
marvelously controlled nuclear reaction
within secondary science education in this
area, leading undoubtedly to new knowl-
edge and ideas among the substitute
teachers as well as among the members
of the Institute.
Frank Drake Is Speaker
At Christmas Lectures
The tenth annual Christmas Lectures for
students and their teachers will take place
at Lisner Auditorium, George Washington
University, on December 21 and 22 at 8
o’clock. Frank D. Drake, associate astrono-
mer at the National Radio Astronomy
Observatory, Green Bank, W.Va., will
lecture on space science.
December, 1961
137
The Christmas Lectures, sponsored by the
Philosophical Society of Washington, are
designed primarily for high school and
advanced junior high school students. Each
year a distinguished scientist is brought
to the area to present illustrated lectures on
recent scientific developments.
Dr. Drake’s first lecture is entitled,
“Searching for Life in Space.” The pos-
sibility of living things beyond the earth
will be discussed, and methods used to
search for them will be described. These
involve the use of space probes; another
technique is concerned with radio astron-
omy. The detection and interpretation of
such signals will be demonstrated.
The second lecture is entitled, “Cosmic
Radio Waves.” The radio emission from
the planets of the solar system will be
described, together with a discussion of
how the study of this emission helps us to
design space probes that will study these
planets.
Dr. Drake is a graduate of Cornell and
Harvard Universities. From 1955 to 1958
he was associated with the Agassiz Station
Radio Astronomy Project of Harvard Uni-
versity, where he worked principally in
21-cm. astronomical research and in in-
frared techniques, as well as in optical
astronomy. In 1960 he headed Project
Oyma, the just-organized high sensitivity
search for extra-terrestrial intelligent radio
signals.
Admission to the lectures is by free
ticket. Requests, accompanied by a self-
addressed stamped envelope, should be sent
to Prof. N. T. Grisamore, School of Engi-
neering, George Washington University,
Washington 6.
THE RROWNSTONE TOWER
“It would be
foolish to allow
ourselves to be
panicked into a
system of higher
education entirely
subservient to our
technologi-
cal needs. The
logic of survival
demands that we
nourish the philos-
opher along with the physicist.” This quo-
tation from an editorial in the New York
Times will serve as our text for today.
Some nourishment for science is re-
quired if scientists are to emerge from our
schools in larger numbers than in the past.
How much and what kinds of nourishment
are needed for the best results? Is it pos-
sible to overnourish our budding scientists,
to be to solicitous, to disturb them and
their teachers by providing too many “pro-
grams” for their benefit? This possibility
is worth examining by the techniques of
social science. The granting agencies of
the Federal government seem to assume
that nothing but good for the country can
come from the expenditure of money for
the encouragement of science talent, the
support of scientific research, and the
training of science teachers. Every imagin-
able program for these purposes is being
tried, as if to get a winning ticket by bet-
ting on every horse in a race.
We should stop concentrating on the
production of scientists and instead en-
courage the production of scholars of all
kinds, including scientists. My humanistic
background tells me that more philosophers
are needed inside and outside of govern-
ment to apply common sense, or wisdom,
where scientific data are lacking and that
our nourishment for the production of
scholars should include support for the
humanities.
Students need, above all, opportunity to
read widely and reflect, to talk among them-
selves and with their teachers, and to de-
velop their philosophy of life; that is, to
become scholars. If thereby a student
comes to admire science as a way of life
in pursuit of demonstrable truth and at the
same time has faith in the brotherhood of
man and love for literature, art, music,
138
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
sport, nature, etc., he will be a credit to
science and an asset to the world.
Feeling as I do about the importance
of providing opportunity for true scholar-
ship, I was pleased to be invited to serve
on the Advisory Council of the U. S. Army
Junior Science and Humanities Symposia
Program. Its first objective is “To pro-
mote the study of the sciences and mathe-
matics, particularly at the high school
level; to demonstrate the part which the
humanities play in the development of the
scientist; to emphasize the importance of
both the sciences and the humanities to
the national culture and general welfare.”
A JSH symposium may include papers by
selected students, scientists, and humanists,
observation and discussion of professional
research in progress at or near the site of
the symposium, free time for students to
talk with one another, and career coun-
seling, all within a period of three days.
Such an experience, without fanfare and
without any atempt to sell science or the
Army’s need for scientists, could not be
harmful and might help a budding scholar
to find himself.
What of the Radioisotopes Institute
described in this issue? Was it a worth-
while endeavor? I think it was. It had a
very practical purpose, not to sell science
but to seed a knowledge of radioactive
isotopes and their uses and abuses among
the science teachers as a means of propa-
gating this knowledge among students and
other teachers. Coming as it did, by
chance, just after the explosion of the 50
megaton bomb in the USSR, it had an
extraordinary impact. It also demonstrated
the wonderful ability of the members of
this scientific community to cooperate and
do promptly what needs to be done with-
out benefit of a Federal grant. I am proud
of the Washington Academy of Sciences
and its president, and of all who helped
him.
— Frank L. Campbell
BOOK REVIEW
Joseph Henry — Trailblazer of Ameri-
can Science. Sarah R. Riedman. 224
pages. Rand McNally & Company, Chi-
cago, 111. 1961. Price $3.50.
There are many things which educated
Americans know about Joseph Henry: that
he discovered electromagnetic induction
and self-induction, the coefficient of which,
the unit of inductance, is called the
“henry”; that he constructed the first
electric motor and invented the telegraph;
that he was the first Secretary of the
Smithsonian Institution. But there are
many things that are not well known about
this modest and self-effacing scientist
which Washington scientists particularly
will be interested to learn, since he made
Washington the cradle of American science
and instituted many scientific activities of
the United States Government which since
have been largely expanded in the service
of science and country for the welfare and
security of the Nation.
When James Smithson, the illegitimate
son of the first Duke of Northumberland
and a noted mineralogist, left a modest
fortune of half a million dollars to the Gov-
ernment of the United States to establish
“an institution for the increase and diffu-
sion of knowledge among men,” there was
no better man to nominate as Secretary of
the newly founded institution than the
professor at the College of New Jersey
(now Princeton University) . It is a matter
of record that this institution owes its
existence as much to Henry as to Smithson,
because it was Henry who, with an iron
will and unmatched energy, protected
Smithson’s heritage against being squan-
dered on petty pet projects of influential
legislators, and, keeping faith with the in-
tention of the donor, made the Smithsonian
Institution what it is today, a focal point
of American science.
It is not generally known that Henry, in
addition to his epochal discoveries in the
fields of electricity and magnetism, made
December, 1961
139
notable contributions in many other fields
of science, especially in optics, acoustics,
and meteorology. In less than ten years he
established lighthouses on the 10,000 miles
of shoreline of the United States, and
equipped them with modern Fresnel lenses
beaming the rays into parallel bundles. He
helped mariners also by creating, on the
basis of acoustic research, powerful sound-
ing devices that could be heard in dense
fog 20 miles away. In his capacity as
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution,
Henry created the first National Herbar-
ium, the first Zoological Park, the Bureau
of Ethnology, and the U.S. Weather Service
with volunteer watchers mapping daily
atmospheric conditions and using the tele-
graph for their transmittal in order to make
daily weather forecasts. With the help of
the prominent naturalist, Spencer Fullerton
Baird, he made a study of food fishes in
coastal waters and thus laid the ground-
work for the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries.
As the United States extended its fron-
tiers to the West, he organized and facili-
tated numerous geographical and geological
expeditions into uncharted territory, and
it was his knowledge of the fish, timber,
and mineral resources of Alaska that in-
duced him to recommend the acquisition
of Alaska from Russia in 1867. Realizing
the difficulty which the scientists of his
time had in procuring foreign publications,
he instituted at the Smithsonian Institution
an international exchange and distribution
service as well as a bibliographic classifica-
tion of scientific data.
If this sounds quite modern, it was the
man who in his thinking was far ahead of
his contemporaries. In the 1860’s, when
the spiritualistic craze was sweeping Wash-
ington and even the family in the White
House, it was Henry who unmasked the
impostors. When the battle over Darwin’s
‘‘Origin of Species” raged among Ameri-
can scientists, not even his best friends
Agassiz, Torrey, and Guyot could swerve
him from his conviction that all known
facts pointed to the theory of evolution as
“the best working hypothesis of the natu-
ralists. ” Not only his thinking, but also
many of his endeavors, are far advanced.
During the Civil War he sent a balloonist
up from the Smithsonian grounds and kept
contact with him by wire, sending messages
on observations by telegraph to President
Lincoln. Thus the Smithsonian Institution
became the midwife of the U.S. Air Force.
And when the wounded — friends and foes
alike — ran out of disinfectants, he ordered
his staff at the Smithsonian Institution to
prepare much-needed chemicals.
As a true scientist, Henry was always
interested in the natural laws underlying
observable phenomena, and as a practical
man he was quick to realize their appli-
cability. “All knowledge is useful,” he
wrote in one of his annual reports of the
Smithsonian Institution, “and the discovery
of today, though appearing unconnected
with any useful process, may in the course
of a few years become the fruitful source
of a thousand inventions.” This maxim
may well serve scientists of our time as a
keynote for action, and our Government
in directing scientific activities.
In writing the biography of this remark-
able man and farsighted scientist who was
largely responsible for the founding of the
National Academy of Sciences, the Ameri-
can Association for the Advancement of
Science, and the Philosophical Society of
Washington, Dr. Riedman not only pro-
vided much needed knowledge about the
life and work of a real “trailblazer of
American science,” but also contributed
greatly to a better understanding of the
growth of the American scientific com-
munity and its institutions. Although the
book is filled with a wealth of otherwise not
easily obtainable information, it is a work
of love for a most lovable personality
which will be an inspiration to its readers.
— Francis J. Weiss
140
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Science in Washington
SCIENTISTS IN THE NEWS
This column presents brief items concerning
the activities of members of the Academy. Such
items may include notices of talks given, im-
portant conferences or visits, promotions, awards,
election to membership or office in scientific and
technical societies, appointment to technical com-
mittees, civic activities, and marriages, births, and
other family news. Formal contributors are as-
signed for the systematic collection of news at
institutions employing considerable numbers of
Academy members (see list on masthead) . How-
ever, for the bulk of the membership, we must
rely on individuals to send us news concerning
themselves and their friends. Contributions may
be addressed to Harold T. Cook, Associate Editor,
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural
Marketing Service, Room 2628 South Building,
Washington 25, D. C.
APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY
A. M. Stone, technical assistant to the direc-
tor, attended the 15th National Conference of
Research at San Juan, P. R., October 9-15. From
October 19 through October 22, Dr. Stone partici-
pated in the third Strategy of Peace Conference
at Airlie House, Warrenton, Va.
COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
E. M. Roberts is the author of a recently-
published book, “Deep Sea, High Mountain,”
which consists of true stories about the field work
activities of the Coast and Geodetic Survey.
DAVID TAYLOR MODEL BASIN
Francois N. Frenkiel, Applied Mathematics
Laboratory, served as chairman of the Interna-
tional Symposium on Fundamental Problems in
Turbulence and their Relation to Geophysics,
held at Marseilles, France, September 4-9. The
symposium was sponsored by the International
Union of Geodesy and Geophysics and the Inter-
national Union of Theoretical and Applied
Mechanics.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Joseph J. Fahey presented a paper on
"Wegschleiderite, a New Saline Mineral from
the Green River Formation, Wyoming,” during
the annual meeting of the Mineralogical Society
of America, Cincinnati, November 2-4.
Alfred M. Pommer has been appointed chair-
man of the Biochemical Analysis Committee, Bio-
medical Sciences Division, Instrument Society of
America.
Dorothy Carroll attended the first Coastal
and Shallow Water Research Conference, At-
lantic Regional Meeting, Baltimore, October 20-
21. The conference was sponsored by the Na-
tional Science Foundation and the Office of Naval
Research.
During October, Edwin W. Roedder spoke
on “The Study of Fluid Inclusions in Minerals”
to the Geology Departments of Lehigh University
and Princeton University, and to the Philadelphia
Mineralogical Society.
Raymond L. Mace attended a symposium on
ground-water resources in arid zones, sponsored
by the International Association of Scientific
Hydrology in Athens, Greece, October 9-20. In a
meeting with the Council of the Association he
discussed possibilities of world-wide cooperation
in a proposed International Decade of Scientific
Hydrology. He also attended a meeting of a
working group of the American Standards As-
sociation, which is studying criteria for selection
of sites for disposal of low-level radioactive waste,
in Chicago November 6-7.
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
John S. Toll, chairman of the Physics De-
partment, is on leave during 1961-62. He is
spending the first semester of the academic year
at Lund, Sweden, where he is engaged in research
wrork at the Institute for Theoretical Physics.
Howard J. Laster is acting chairman of the
Department during Dr. Toll’s absence.
S. Fred Singer, who is in charge of the space
research program in the Physics Department, is
on leave for research at the Jet Propulsion Labo-
ratory of the California Institute of Technology,
and later will spend some time at Princeton.
Harry D. Holmgren, formerly on the staff of
the Naval Research Laboratory, has become an
associate professor in the Physics Department.
Gianni Quareni, a high energy physicist at
the University of Bologna, is visiting associate
professor of physics for the present academic
year. His wife, Angela Vignudelli, will serve as
a postdoctoral research assistant in physics.
USDA, BELTSVILLE
C. H. Hoffmann, assistant director of the
Entomology Research Division, was guest speaker
at the 57th Annual Convention of the Interna-
tional Association of Ice Cream Manufacturers
on October 27, in Washington. He spoke on “New
Concepts in Controlling Farm Insects.”
December, 1961
141
During October, Lawrence Zelenv attended
meetings at Chicago, Dallas, Fargo, Fort Worth,
Great Falls, Huron, and Kansas City, to explain
and demonstrate to the grain trade and Depart-
ment of Agriculture officials the use of the sedi-
mentation test for estimating the bread-baking
strength of wheat. This test will be used as a
basis for loan premiums in the Department’s
1962 wheat price support program.
F. F\ Cullinan, associate director of the
Crops Research Division, was awarded the
Charles Reid Barnes Life Membership of the
American Society of Plant Physiologists at the
annual banquet of the Society during the
AIBS meetings at Purdue University, Lafayette,
Ind., in August.
E. F. Knipling, director of the Entomology
Research Division, and R. C. Bushland, investi-
gations leader of Livestock Insect Research at
the Kerrville (Tex.) laboratory of ERD, were
joint recipients of the John Scott Award for their
part in the development of the sterile male method
for screw-worm eradication. The award was pre-
sented during the meeting of the Eastern Branch
of the Entomological Society of America, held in
Baltimore in October.
Myron S. Anderson, ARS, attended the Na-
tional Meeting of the American Chemical Society
in Chicago in September. He presented a paper
entitled, “A Look at Composts,” before the Divi-
sion of Fertilizer and Soil Chemistry.
Arthur Wr. Lindquist was a recipient of the
Department’s Distinguished Service Award this
year “for original research and forceful leader-
ship in improving the health and welfare of man
and livestock through the development of new
methods for controlling insects of medical and
veterinary importance.’ Dr. Lindquist has been
chief of the Insects Affecting Man and Animals
Research Branch, ARS, since 1953. During
World War II he was a member of the team at
the Department s Orlando laboratory, which de-
veloped a method of impregnating clothing with
chemicals to protect military personnel from dis-
ease-carrying insects, for which the team received
the Department’s Distinguished Service Unit
Award in 1947.
USDA, WASHINGTON
Edward H. Graham, director of Plant Tech-
nology, Soil Conservation Service, has been ap-
pointed representative of the Ecological Society
of America to the International Union of Biologi-
cal Sciences.
On October 30, George W. Irving, Jr., was
toastmaster for the Harvey W. Wiley Award
Banquet sponsored by the Association of Official
Agricultural Chemists at the Shoreham Hotel.
Hazel K. Stiebeling, director of the Institute
of Home Economics, spoke at the Food and
Nutrition Conference for S’tudents and Alumnae
of the School of Home Economics, Ohio State
University, on October 21. Dr. Stiebeling spoke
on “Opportunities in Nutritional Sciences” at a
conference commemorating the Land-Grant
Centennial at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, No-
vember 3-4.
UNCLASSIFIED
Donald B. McMullen, leader of the WHO
Bilharziasis Advisory Team and on leave from
the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, will
continue his association with Endemo-epidemic
Diseases, Division of Communicable Diseases,
World Health Organization, at Geneva, Switzer-
land, until the end of 1962. This inter-regional
team, organized in 1958, has reviewed the bil-
harziasis problem in 16 countries, evaluated
control measures, and attempted to coordinate
them with agricultural and water resources
development.
Bernard Frank, professor of watershed man-
agement at Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, a former member of the Forest Service,
in Washington, has been awarded a grant by
the Conservation Foundation of New York to
prepare a textbook — the first of its kind — on
watershed management. Collaborating with Mr.
Frank is Robert E. Dils, leader of the Colorado
State University Cooperative Management Unit.
The book is scheduled for publication in 1963.
DEATHS
Paul Renno Heyl died in October at the age
of 89. Dr. Heyl was born in Philadelphia and
received both his bachelor of science and Ph.D.
degrees from the University of Pennsylvania. He
taught physics in Philadelphia and Reading from
1898 to 1910, then joined a commercial research
firm in New York City. In 1920 he joined the
Bureau of Standards, where he became chief of
the Sound Division. He retired in 1942, but
served as a consultant in physics and mathematics
for several Government and industrial projects
during the War. His invention of the earth
induction compass first made aerial navigation
possible.
AFFILIATED SOCIETIES
Acoustical Society of America, Washington
Chapter
A demonstration talk by Edith Corliss, NBS,
entitled “Through the Hearing Aid,” was held
on November 20 in the Exhibit Room of the
Industrial Building, NBS. An informal dinner
at the Cafe Burgundy preceded the meeting.
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
Washington Section
The general meeting on October 11 presented
Wm. J. Ellenberger, DOD, on the topic, “Plan-
ning the Structure of the Engineering Profession
142
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
to Achieve Unity.” We are interested to note in
the November bulletin of the Section a para-
graph to the effect that a movement is underway
to combine the AIEE with the IRE as a single
engineering society, which may bear on the same
general issue.
William B. Kouenhoven of Johns Hopkins,
addressed the Section on November 9 on the
subject, “The Effect of Electric Shock on
Humans.”
This year’s Student Night, November 14, fea-
tured a tour of the National Bureau of Standards,
the first time in many years that certain of the
laboratories have been open in the evening for an
event of this kind. Chester H. Page, former editor
of the Journal, highlighted some of the research
and development activities of the Bureau in a
talk beginning at 7 :30 p.m.
The Aero Space Technical Group sponsored a
visit on November 15 to the Goddard Space
Center at Greenbelt.
American Meteorological Society, D. C.
Branch
Richard J. Reed of the University of Wash-
ington, presently visiting scientist at the Na-
tional Meteorological Center, addressed the
Branch on “Suprises in the Equatorial Strato-
sphere.” He dealt particularly with wind and
temperature fluctuations which oscillate in a
cycle that does not appear simply connected with
annual transit of the sun across the equator.
American Society of Civil Engineers, Na-
tional Capital Section
The October luncheon meeting, on the 24th,
heard Archie N. Carter, of Carter, Krueger &
Associates, speak on the “Local Impact of Federal
Programs,” with special reference to such projects
as the St. Lawrence Seaway, the Atomic Energy
program, and the Interstate Highway System.
Rep. Robert F. Ellsworth (Kansas) addressed
the November dinner meeting of the Section on
the topic, “An Engineer in Politics.”
On November 28, at the regular luncheon meet-
ing, Maj. Gen. James B. Lampert, Corps of Engi-
neers, in a talk entitled “Civil Engineering in
Missile and Space Programs,” considered the
impact of these construction programs on the
Civil Engineering profession, particularly from
the standpoint of management.
The November “Civil Engineer” notes that 120
members of the Section have volunteered to help
area high schools in such instances as the recent
institute on radioactivity attended by science
teachers.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Washington Section
Eldon E. Sweezy, management consultant to
the Department of the Army and an instructor
at American University, addressed the October
26 meeting of the Section on “Managers of Crea-
tive Engineering,” dealing with scientific organi-
zations, laboratories, and engineering, per se.
Much publicity, naturally, attended the pres-
entation on November 9, by Antole Kuznetsov,
Third Secretary of the S’oviety Embassy, of a
talk on “Achievements of Soviet Industry,” and
a film on the flight of Maj. Titov, the cosmonaut.
Chemical Society of Washington
The November 9 meeting, held at Walter Reed
Institute of Research, featured a panel discus-
sion on “The Chemical Origin of Life,” in which
the participants were Philip H. Abelson of the
Geophysical Laboratory and Sidney W. Fox of
the Oceanographic Institute, Florida State Univer-
sity. Dr. Abelson spoke on “Chemical Reactions
in the Primitive Environment,” and Dr. Fox on
“Origin of Protein Macromolecules and of Supra-
molecular Sysems.”
Two topical group meetings were held before
the general meeting. Alfred Burger of the Uni-
versity of Virginia addressed the Organic Group
on “Medicinal Chemistry — Its Problems, Hopes,
and Dilemmas, and H. W. Koch of the National
Bureau of Standards addressed the Physical
Group on “Research with High Energy X-rays and
Electrons.”
A record group of over 350 persons participated
in the annual elections that preceded the gen-
eral meeting. The following officers were elected
for 1962: Alfred E. Brown, president-elect;
Alphonse F. Forziati, secretary; and Leo Schu-
bert, treasurer.
Columbia Historical Society
November 11 was the Annual Homecoming at
the Heurich Memorial Mansion, 1307 New
Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
“Old Washington Houses as Seen by an Out-
sider,” was the subject of an illustrated talk on
November 17 by Mrs. J. R. Longard, a member
of the Old Houses Group of the University
Women’s Club of Halifax, Canada. She and her
husband, an experienced photographer and as-
sociated with the Canadian Joint Staff, have
walked the streets of Washington studying the
architecture of 100-year old houses.
November 25 marked the opening afternoon
reception, in the Powell Auditorium, of an exhibit
entitled “Prints and Photographs of Washington
During the Civil War.”
Geological Society of Washington
“Paleontological Pitfalls,” a group of short
talks illustrating the diversity of paleontological
work and some lapses and progress in its philos-
ophy, with examples from recent history of the
profession, constituted the program for Novem-
ber 8. Speakers were Erie G. Kauffman, U.S.
National Museum, and Frank C. Whitmore,
Mackenzie Gordon, Jr., Nicholas Hotton, III,
December, 1961
143
and William A. Oliver, all of the Geological
Survey.
The regular program of November 29 included
a 30-minute color film of the eruption of Kilauea,
1959-60. introduced by Edwin Roedder, and
papers by Wallace E. Stener, Stanford University,
on “Major Powell and the Beginnings of the
Conservation Movement,” and E. C. T. Chao,
USGS, on "The Ries Crater of Southern Germany
— Meteoric or Volcanic?”
Helminthological Society of Washington
Five papers constituted the program of the
382nd meeting of the Society on November 30 in
Wilson Hall, NIH; "Variation in Susceptibility of
Inbred Mice to Cepticercus fasciolaris,” by A. W.
Cheever; "The Effect of Dead Worms on the
Development and Progress of Experimental
Hepato-splenic Schisto-somiasis mansoni in Mice,”
by K. S. WTarren; “In Vitro Studies on the Main-
tenance and Early Development of Dirofilaria
immitis Microfilariae,” by J. K. Sawyer and P. P.
Weinstein; "The Nutritional State of the Host in
Relation to Experimental Malaria Chemo-
therapy,” by R. L. Jacobs; and “Metastatic
Calcification in Rats Due to Hytakerol as Modi-
fied by Infection with Plasmodium berghei,” by
T. I. Mercado.
Insecticide Society of Washington
Two papers by members of the Entomology
Research Division. USD A, were presented at the
November 15 meeting of the Society: "10th
Pacific Science Congress — Insect Problems in the
Pacific Area,” by L. F. Steiner, and “What is the
Trend in Insect Control Agents?” by Stanley A.
Hall.
Institute of Radio Engineers, Washington
Section
At the general meeting, November 13, Paul H.
Robbins, executive director of the National So-
ciety of Professional Engineers, spoke on the
subject, "Your Technology Is Not Enough. ’
Technical meetings during the month of No-
vember included the following: November 1 —
“Application of Computer Systems to Air Traffic
Control”; November 7 — “How Smart Can You
Be — Is Electronic Sophistication Debasing our De-
fense Picture?”; November 14 — “High Power
Microwave Switching, Using Gas and Vacuum
Techniques”; November 20 — “The Possible Use
of VHF Television Frequencies for Land Mobile
Communications”; and November 21 — “Solution
of a Space Rendezvous Problem.”
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
The 29th Annual Scientific Assembly of the
Medical Society of the District of Columbia was
scheduled for November 27-29, with sessions on
cholesterol and its metabolism, tranquilizers and
antidepressants, and the “The Physician’s Role
During the First 30 Minutes,” the last concerned
with accident victims of all kinds. Panel dis-
cussions in the afternoons treated as subjects:
diet and atherosclerosis, use of tranquilizers and
antidepressants, and responsibility in assuming
emergency medical care. A number of specialty
meetings on cardiac problems, radiology, surgery,
malignancy, internal medicine, and anesthesiology
completed the assembly.
Most of the events cited in the monthly list of
Current Medical Events are, understandably, of
a technical nature. We note, however, a panel
discussion on November 8 on the general topic,
"The Relation of Religion to Medicine,” a paper
at Columbia Hospital on “Medical Legal
Matters,” one at Sibley Hospital on “Soma’s
Influence on the Psyche,” and a closed session at
Georgetown University which considered the
place of genetics in the curriculum of the medical
student.
Philosophical Society of Washington
On November 25, Robert P. Madden, NBS,
addressed the Society on the subject, “Emancipa-
tion of Far Ultraviolet Physics.”
Society of American Military Engineers,
W ashington Post
Harris B. Stewart, Jr., Coast and Geodetic
Survey, was featured speaker at the November 20
luncheon meeting, and presented a talk on "The
Challenge of Oceanography.”
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Events which will take place , so jar as we can
determine at the time of writing, are noted below.
Where no indication of the program other than
date appears, it will in most instances be a regu-
larly-scheduled meeting of the society. Last-min-
ute changes in time and place, or emergency can-
cellations, cannot be reflected here.
December 11 — American Society for Metals,
Washington Chapter
Joint meeting with the American Wielding So-
ciety. "Diffusion Bonding,” with a speaker from
the Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
AAUW Building, 2401 Virginia Avenue, N.W.,
8:00 p.m.; dinner at 6:30 p.m.
December 11 — Institute of Radio Engineers,
W ashington Section
Museum of Natural History, 8:00 p.m.
December 12 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
Powell Auditorium. Dinner, 6:30 p.m.; pro-
gram, 8:00 p.m.
December 13 — American Institute of Elec-
trical Engineers, W ashington Section
“Air Safety,” by James T. Pyle, Federal Avia-
144
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
tion Agency.
PEPCO Auditorium, 10th and E Sts., N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
December 13 — Geological Society of Wash-
ington
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
December 14 — Chemical Society of Wash-
ington
Topical Group meetings at 5:00 p.m.: Biochem-
ical, Paul L. Day, Food & Drug Administration,
‘'The Science of Biochemistry: Past, Present, and
Future”; Organic, Milton Orchin, University of
Cincinnati, “Cis-trans Isomerization Catalyzed by
Selenium”; Physical, George K. Fraenkel, Co-
lumbia University, “Determination of Electron
Distributions from Electron Spin Resonance
Spectra”; Analytical, Bourdon F. Scribner, NBS,
“An Analytical Tour of West Europe.” At NIH,
various locations.
Cocktails at 6:00, dinner at 6:45, at Naval
Medical Center.
General meeting at 8:15: Karl A. Folkers,
Merck and Company, “Newer Aspects of Chem-
ical and Biological Research on Coenzyme Q.”
At NIH, Clinical Center Auditorium.
December 14 — American Society of Me-
chanical Engineers, Washington Section
Regular meeting in area of nuclear engineering
and heat transfer.
PEPCO Auditorium. 10th and E. Sts., N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
December 15 — Helminthological Society of
Washington
Open program meeting featuring notes from the
floor.
American University, 8:00 p.m.
December 18 — Acoustical Society of Amer-
ica, Washington Chapter
National Bureau of Standards, 8:00 p.m.
December 18 — Society of American Military
Engineers, Washington Post
YWCA, 17th and K. Sts., N.W. Luncheon at
noon.
December 19 — Anthropological Society of
Washington
Room 43, Museum of Natural History, 8:15
p.m.
December 20 — Insecticide Society of Wash-
ington
Symons Hall, University of Maryland, 8:00 p.m.
December 20 — Washington Society of Engi-
neers
Powell Auditorium, 8:00 p.m.
December 21 — Society of American Forest-
ers, W ashington Section
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W. Dinner meeting
at 6:30 p.m.
December 21-22 — Philosophical Society of
Washington
Christmas Lectures by Frank D. Drake, Na-
tional Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank,
W. Va.
Lisner Auditorium, George Washington Uni-
versity, 8:00 p.m.
December 26 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
“Highways in Russia,” Francis Turner, Acting
Commissioner of Public Roads.
YWCA, 17th and K Sts., N.W. Luncheon at
noon.
December 26 — Society of American Bacteri-
ologists, Washington Branch
Walter Reed Medical Center, 8:00 p.m.
December 27 — American Society of Civil
Engineers, National Capital Section
Christmas party.
December 28 — American Society of Me-
chanical Engineers, Washington Section
PEPCO Auditorium, 10th and E Sts., N.W.,
8:00 p.m.
BOARD OF MANAGERS
MEETING NOTES
The Board of Managers held its 540th meet-
ing on October 3 at the National Academy of
Sciences, with President Abelson presiding.
The minutes of the 539th meeting were ap-
proved with minor corrections.
Announcements. Dr. Abelson announced ap-
pointment of John K. Taylor as chairman of the
Committee on Encouragement of Science Talent,
for the remainder of the Academy year, in place
of Lloyd N. Ferguson; of Herbert L. Ley, Jr., to
the Medical Sciences Panel, Membership Com-
mittee, through 1963, replacing Webb E. Hay-
maker; and of Norman Bekkedahl as chairman
of the Committee on Awards for Scientific
Achievement.
Meetings Committee. For Chairman Frenkiel,
the secretary announced that at the October 19
general meeting, T. Dale Stewart of the Smith-
sonian Insitution would speak on “The Last
Phase of Human Evolution.”
Dr. Abelson reported on progress in setting up
the Institute on Isotopes and Radioactivity,
planned for the first week of November. (See
also story elsewhere in this issue.) Arrangements
to permit attendance by Academy members as
well as science teachers were under consideration.
Membership Committee. The secretary an-
nounced the names of eight new Academy mem-
bers, elected pursuant to the Board’s action at
December, 1961
145
its June meeting, as follows: Clyde S. Barnhart,
Chester R. Benjamin, Francis J. Heyden, Ralph
E. Lapp, Morris Lieberman, Robert M. Page,
Vera C. Rubin, and James H. Trexler.
Committee on Awards for Scientific Achieve-
ment. Dr. Abelson urged that nominations for
awards for scientific achievement, to be presented
at the annual meeting of the Academy next
January, be submitted to Dr. Bekkedahl as early
as possible.
Committee on Grants-inlaid. Dr. McPherson
announced a grant of $100 to Carl Miller for
a research project, pursuant to previous action by
the Board. The Board approved another grant,
in the amount of $55, to Thomas G. Hoffman of
Fairfax High School, for a project on ion ex-
change resins.
Dr. McPherson brought up a matter, discussed
in the Policy and Planning Committee, concern-
ing the use of funds that AAAS has been grant-
ing to WAS and other U.S. science academies
for support of research. A letter from Dr. Abel-
son to AAAS was quoted, expressing the view
that such funds granted to the Washington
Academy should not be restricted to use by sec-
ondary school students, but should be applicable
to both senior and junior scientists, in accord-
ance with need and probability of effective use.
Mr. Braaten brought up the point that AAAS
funds might well be used to reimburse the Acad-
emy for the $300 it gave for support of summer
research by high school students under the
mechanism developed by Dr. Schubert. Dr. Mc-
Pherson indicated that he would obtain an
opinion from AAAS on this question.
Policy and Planning Committee. Dr. Camp-
bell discussed the background of an application
made by the Washington Section of the Institute
of Food Technology, for affiliation with the
Academy. Dr. McPherson moved that the question
of affiliation be placed on the ballot in the De-
cember elections, for approval by the membership.
The motion was passed.
Dr. Campbell reported the Committee’s recom-
mendation that annual dues be raised to $10 for
resident members and $7.50 for nonresident mem-
bers. He reviewed the budgetary situation and
pointed out that expenses for the current year
were still exceeding income, despite the fact that
the Academy’s paid staff officer was released last
March. He pointed out that the Journal was op-
erating on as stringent a budget as could be
expected, and that any expansion could be effected
only at increased cost. He spoke, also, with regard
to the matter of assistance to the officers, indicat-
ing that it was quite necessary that the time-
honored system of relying on the elected officers
to supply clerical and other assistance from their
own offices be supplemented by central office
activities. He pointed out that it was becoming
increasingly difficult to induce proposed nominees
to accept nomination to office in the face of the
very strenuous responsibilities which a number
of these offices carry.
Dr. McPherson moved that the dues increase
be put to a vote of the membership. After a
general discussion, and a review of the financial
situation by Mr. Braaten, the motion was unani-
mously passed and the secretary was instructed
to include the question in the annual ballot.
Committee on Encouragement of Science Tal-
ent. Dr. Schubert summarized the contents of a
comprehensive report that he had prepared, con-
cerning the Committee’s activities in connection
with the program for summer research by high
school students. Briefly, the program was an en-
tire success. (See also the story, “Joint Board
Sponsors Student Research Program,” in the
November Journal, page 117.)
Committee on Science Education. Dr. Taylor
summarized recent activities of the Committee
and the Joint Board on S’cience Education. He
indicated that a meeting set up through Dr.
Seeger in the early summer had resulted in a
very successful discussion between about 50 rep-
resentatives of five different academies of this
area. (See also the story, “WAS Holds Inter-
academy Education Conference,” in the Novem-
ber Journal, page 119.) It was his feeling that
the Academy and the Joint Board were leading
the country in science education efforts, and that
the other state academies were looking to us for
guidance in this field. He reported that the bud-
get for the year had been cut considerably,
amounting to $26,725. Since on October 16 there
would be a deadline for re-application for funds
from NSF, it was planned to apply for only
$10,000 for the coming year and to omit certain
items of school support which had swelled the
budget of prior requests. He felt, however, that
it was also necessary to request that The Re-
porter, previously supported by a grant from
the Meyer Foundation now be funded through
NSF. He requested that NSF be asked to per-
mit diversion of present funds to recover the
current expenses of the magazine; the Board
approved this request.
Special Committee for Directory. Dr. Campbell
stated that, at Dr. Abelson’s request, he had
recommended the appointment of R. W. Krauss
of the University of Maryland as chairman of a
special committee to investigate the feasibility
of preparing a joint directory of the membership
of the Academy and affiliated societies.
Nominations. After the Board had adjourned,
the delegates of the affiliated societies remained
to act as a Nominating Committee, under the
chairmanship of the senior delegate, Lawson Mc-
Kenzie of the Philosophical Society, to draw up a
slate of officers for 1962.
146
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
JOINT BOARD
ON SCIENCE EDUCATION
At its October meeting, the Joint Board set
its sights high and voted to aim at a record
budget of $14,375 to operate its program during
the 1961-62 school year. This includes a normal
budget of $12,575 and a supplemental budget
of $1,800 to provide for its planned programs.
The summer training program, science fairs,
and publication of The Reporter are the major
items in the budget with $4,000, $3,325, and
$2,500 being allotted respectively for these ac-
tivities. The school contacts program was allotted
$1,000, while $750 was budgeted for science
teacher awards. The Committee on Women in
Science received a budget of $250, while the
Frontiers in Science lectures account for $150.
Various administrative expenses account for $225.
The supplemental budget would provide $1,000
to expand and improve the summer training
program, and $800 to permit sending a full quota
of representatives to the National Science Fair.
The Board’s income includes $6,500 from grants
to finance the summer training program and
publication of The Reporter. Professional soci-
eties and industrial organizations, as in the past,
are expected to contribute some $5,200. Sale of
project books and other sources of revenue are
expected to amount to another $875. This leaves
a balance of $1,800 that must be obtained from
other sources if program goals are to be fully
realized.
Part of the increased budget is due to the
fact that the science fair will be held on the
Pacific coast. The larger portion is the result of
more services being rendered to more people.
It is hoped that regular contributors will be as
generous as possible, and that new donors will
join their ranks to insure the success of the
JBSE’s 1961-62 program.
The book, “Project Ideas for Young Scientists,”
published by the Joint Board in October 1960,
has exhausted its first printing of 3,000 copies.
This 140-page book contains more than 400
investigative-type projects suggested by local
scientists as applicable to the secondary school
level. It has received very favorable reviews and
has been distributed nationally. In fact, some
100 copies have been sent to various international
purchasers.
In view of continuing orders, the Board ap-
proved a second printing of 1,000 copies of the
book. Meanwhile, plans are being made to pre-
pare a revised and enlarged edition for publica-
tion probably in the fall of 1962. Members of
the Academy interested in contributing to the
new edition are invited to contact the editor,
John K. Taylor, National Bureau of Standards,
Washington 25, D.C., for further details.
The series of conferences on the teaching of
science and mathematics in secondary schools is
in full swing. An inter-academy conference (re-
ported in the November number of the Journal ),
and conferences concerned with biology, physics,
and general science (Northern Virginia area)
have already been held. In addition, plans have
been made for the following conferences: Chem-
istry— January 20; General Science (D.C. area)
— February 17; General Science (Maryland
area) — March 10; Women in S’cience — March 31;
Mathematics — April 14; Elementary School Sci-
ence— early May.
A special conference devoted to career coun-
seling in engineering is being planned for Janu-
ary 6.
Invitations to attend these all-day meetings
are issued to those known to be interested in
science education. The Joint Board is always
glad to add new names to its list and would be
glad to know of those who would like to attend
any of the conferences mentioned. Invitations will
be extended insofar as possible.
WASHINGTON JUNIOR
ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
The Washington Junior Academy of Sciences
will hold its annual convention at the Hamilton
Hotel on December 28, from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Several hundred members and other students
are expected to attend to hear papers presented
by some 40 students on various subjects in sci-
ence and mathematics.
The convention will consist of four concurrent
morning and afternoon sessions in the fields of
biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics, de-
voted to student papers. A luncheon, for all
attendees, will be partially subsidized by the
WJAS to encourage a large attendance.
The Junior Academy is also planning a work-
shop for science club officials to be held early in
January. Originally scheduled for November, it
was postponed because of several conflicts that
would have prevented a large attendance. The
conference, patterned after the very successful
one held during December 1960. will be con-
cerned with various activities carried on by the
clubs, as well as consideration of ways in which
club programs can be strengthened. A speaker
from the Joint Board will be present to discuss
ways in which it can help science clubs.
SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT
A handy gadget that will make enough
fresh water to keep survivors of sea disasters
from dying of thirst has been developed by
the Army Engineer Research and Develop-
ment Laboratories at Fort Belvoir. It oper-
December, 1961
147
ates with heat from the sun's rays or from the
body of an individual sitting on it. It consists
of a sheaf of five sheets about the size of standard
typewriter paper. Each sheet is made up of a
black plastic film on top, piece of paper toweling
or cloth, then a water-repellent screen, a sheet of
aluminum foil and a cloth backing for the foil.
A sponge to collect the fresh water completes the
kit. The sheets are dipped in the ocean, excess
water is drained and the aluminum foil wiped
dry. The sheets are reassembled with the black
plastic film on top and exposed to the sun or body
heat. The heat penetrates the aluminum foil
which is cooled by the bottom saltwater soaked
cloth. Fresh water condenses on the foil. The
survivor uses the sponge to soak up the water.
There may be only a few drops, but enough to
keep a person alive.
American University has set up a cancer
research laboratory at Sibley Memorial
Hospital. The laboratory was established under
an $85,000 grant from the National Cancer In-
stitute. Research will be conducted with preg-
nant mice to determine why fetuses and tumors
of fetal origin are not rejected by the mother as
would be other foreign “skin grafts.” If tolerance
to foreign substances can be induced or destroyed
at will, the findings could be applied to many
medical problems including leukemia, pregnancy
diseases, replacement of defective tissues and
organs, and fetal-originated tumors.
A new class of non-magnetic alloys that
are corrosion resistant and have almost the
hardness of tool steel has been developed at
the Naval Ordnance Laboratory. The new
alloys are intermetallic compounds formed by a
combination of titanium and nickel, and have
been named Nitinol. The alloys are strong and
tough, having been tested up to 43 foot-pounds
impact strength. The toughness increases as tem-
perature decreases, yet the alloys are suitable for
use up to about 1200°F. The specific gravity of
6.45 means that the alloys offer strength without
adding weight, and are useful for aircraft, tools,
and other applications. Nitinol has a very high
mechanical vibration capacity at room tempera-
ture, which decreases rapidly as temperature is
increased. This characteristic may make it useful
in temperature-sensing devices.
A tidal current survey is being made in
the Potomac between the South Capitol
Street Bridge and Dahlgren, Va. The survey
is being made by the Survey Ship Mariner of the
Coast and Geodetic Survey. Results of the survey
will furnish mariners with up-to-date information
on the direction and velocity of the currents under
certain bridges, at river turns, and at narrow
stretches where changes in the velocity have been
known to exist. The information will be incor-
porated into the C&GS Tidal Current Tables.
These tables enable pilots of tugs and seagoing
vessels to navigate more safely, and are used in
planning bridge construction, dredging opera-
tions and other projects.
The Department of Interior announced on
September 22 that a geological survey of
potential ground water supplies of Wash-
ington, D.C., and adjacent areas has been
completed. The report has been placed in the
files and is available for public examination.
While the major requirements of the area are
met by surface water considerable ground water
is used in fringe areas not reached by city sup-
plies. Ground water throughout the study area
is generally satisfactory for domestic and indus-
trial use but in some places, excessive iron and
corrosiveness are problems.
A direct and rapid test for nutritive value
of feeds has been developed by the Depart-
ment of Agriculture. The test measures and
defines the parts of livestock feed that provide
body energy and growth. The new test takes
only about five hours, whereas the old method
required about two days. The new method may
indicate the nutritive value of feeds in terms of
meat or milk production. It also may be useful
for gauging the loss of nutrients in feeds heated
excessively during drying.
148
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences
Delegates for 1961 to the Washington Academy of Sciences, Representing
the Local Affiliated Societies
Philosophical Society of Washington
Anthropological Society of Washington
Biological Society of Washington
Chemical Society of Washington
Entomological Society of Washington
National Geographic Society
Geological Society of Washington
Medical Society of the District of Columbia
Columbia Historical Society
Botanical Society of Washington
Society of American Foresters
Washington Society of Engineers
American Institute of Electrical Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Helminthological Society of Washington
Society of American Bacteriologists
Institute of Radio Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
American Society for Metals
International Association for Dental Research
Institute of the Aerospace Sciences
American Meteorological Society
Insecticide Society of Washington
Acoustical Society of America
American Nuclear Society
Lawson M. McKenzie
Regina Flannery Herzfeld
Herbert Friedmann
John L. Torgesen
William E. Bickley
Alexander Wetmore
Margaret D. Foster
Frederick 0. Coe
U. S. Grant, III
Harold T. Cook
Harry A. Fowells
Howard S. Rappleye
William A. Geyger
William G. Allen
Doys A. Shorb
Mary Louise Robbins
Robert D. Huntoon
Joseph M. Caldwell
Kathryn Knowlton
John A. Bennett
Gerhard Brauer
Francois N. Frenkiel
Jack Thompson
Milton S. Schechter
Richard K. Cook
Urner Liddel
Volume 51
DECEMBER 1961
No. 8
CONTENTS
Is Plant Pathology a Fake? 129
Membership to Vote on Officers, Dues Increase 131
The Proposed Dues Increase 132
Radioisotopes Institute Proves Big Success 133
Frank Drake Is Speaker at Christmas Lectures 137
The Brownstone T ower 138
Book Review — Joseph Henry 139
Science in Washington
Scientists in the News 141
Affiliated Societies 142
Calendar of Events 144
Board of Managers Meeting Notes 145
Joint Board on Science Education 145
Junior Academy 147
Science and Development 147
Washington Academy of Sciences
1530— P St., N.W.
Washington, D. C.
Return Postage Guaranteed
2nd Class Postage
Paid at
Washington, D. C.
t I 8« A9v OF A
A9809£TUM
2 £ Divinity
C a m 8 *R l 00 £ 3 6
HNQL o
A V£
MASS
J
A A 3
a<2